58/
DUHEDVHGSULPDULO\RQDJHDQGFRQGLWLRQZLWKWKHSUHVXPSWLRQRIFRQWLQXHGXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKH3URSHUW\ VLPLODUWRWKHREVHUYHGDQGUHSRUWHGSDVWXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHSUDFWLFHVLQFRQMXQFWLRQZLWKWKHSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWRI %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VDVVHVVRUV6LJQLILFDQWFKDQJHVLQRFFXSDQWVDQGRUXVDJHPD\DIIHFWWKHVHUYLFHOLIHRIVRPHV\VWHPVRU FRPSRQHQWV
:KHUHTXDQWLWLHVFRXOGQRWEHRUZHUHQRWGHULYHGIURPDQDFWXDOFRQVWUXFWLRQGRFXPHQWWDNHRIIRUIDFLOLW\ZDONWKURXJK DQGRUZKHUHV\VWHPLFFRVWVDUHPRUHDSSOLFDEOHRUSURYLGHPRUHLQWULQVLFYDOXHEXGJHWDU\VTXDUHIRRWDQGJURVVVTXDUH IRRWFRVWVDUHXVHG(VWLPDWHGFRVWVDUHEDVHGRQSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWDQGWKHSUREDEOHRUDFWXDOH[WHQWRIWKHREVHUYHG GHIHFWLQFOXVLYHRIWKHFRVWWRGHVLJQSURFXUHFRQVWUXFWDQGPDQDJHWKHFRUUHFWLRQV * 'HILQLWLRQV
,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
,PPHGLDWH 1HHGV DUH OLQH LWHPV WKDW UHTXLUH LPPHGLDWH DFWLRQ DV D UHVXOW RI
PDWHULDO H[LVWLQJ RU SRWHQWLDO XQVDIH
FRQGLWLRQV
IDLOHGRULPPLQHQWIDLOXUHRIPLVVLRQFULWLFDOEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVRU
FRQGLWLRQVWKDWLIQRW
DGGUHVVHGKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHVXOWLQRUFRQWULEXWHWRFULWLFDOHOHPHQWRUV\VWHPIDLOXUHZLWKLQRQH\HDURUZLOOPRVW SUREDEO\UHVXOWLQDVLJQLILFDQWHVFDODWLRQRILWVUHPHGLDOFRVW )RU GDWDEDVH DQG UHSRUWLQJ SXUSRVHV WKH OLQH LWHPV ZLWK 58/ DQG FRPPRQO\ DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK Safet RU Perfor ance ntegrit 3ODQ7\SHVDUHFRQVLGHUHG,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
&RVWOLQHLWHPVWUDGLWLRQDOO\FDOOHG5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV HTXLYDOHQWO\UHIHUUHGWRDV/LIHF\FOH5HQHZDOV
DUHIRUUHFXUULQJ
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
5HSODFHPHQW FRVWV DUH VROLFLWHG IURP RZQHUVKLSSURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW %XUHDX 9HULWDV¶V GLVFXVVLRQV ZLWK VHUYLFH FRPSDQLHVPDQXIDFWXUHUV
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDQGSUHYLRXVH[SHULHQFHLQSUHSDULQJVXFKVFKHGXOHVIRURWKHUVLPLODUIDFLOLWLHV &RVWVIRUZRUNSHUIRUPHGE\WKHRZQHUVKLS¶VRUSURSHUW\PDQDJHPHQW¶VPDLQWHQDQFHVWDIIDUHDOVRFRQVLGHUHG %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VUHVHUYHPHWKRGRORJ\LQYROYHVLGHQWLILFDWLRQDQGTXDQWLILFDWLRQRIWKRVHV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVUHTXLULQJ FDSLWDOUHVHUYHIXQGVZLWKLQWKHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRG7KHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRGLVGHILQHGDVWKHHIIHFWLYHDJHSOXVWKHUHVHUYH WHUP$GGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQFRQFHUQLQJV\VWHP¶VRUFRPSRQHQW¶VUHVSHFWLYHUHSODFHPHQWFRVWV LQWRGD\
VGROODUV
W\SLFDO
H[SHFWHG XVHIXO OLYHV DQG UHPDLQLQJ XVHIXO OLYHV ZHUH HVWLPDWHG VR WKDW D IXQGLQJ VFKHGXOH FRXOG EH SUHSDUHG 7KH 5HSODFHPHQW 5HVHUYHV 6FKHGXOH SUHVXSSRVHV WKDW DOO UHTXLUHG UHPHGLDO ZRUN KDV EHHQ SHUIRUPHG RU WKDW PRQLHV IRU UHPHGLDWLRQKDYHEHHQEXGJHWHGIRULWHPVGHILQHGDV,PPHGLDWH1HHGV )RUWKHSXUSRVHVRIµEXFNHWL]LQJ¶WKH6\VWHP([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVWVLQWKLVUHSRUWWKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVKDYHEHHQ VXEGLYLGHGDQGJURXSHGDVIROORZV
6KRUW7HUP
\HDUV
1HDU7HUP
\HDUV
0HGLXP7HUP
\HDUV
DQG/RQJ
7HUP
\HDUV
.H\)LQGLQJV
,QDQHIIRUWWRKLJKOLJKWWKHPRVWVLJQLILFDQWFRVWLWHPVDQGQRWEHRYHUZKHOPHGE\WKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVUHSRUWLQLWV WRWDOLW\DVXEVHFWLRQRI.H\)LQGLQJVLVLQFOXGHGZLWKLQWKH$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWHDQG)DFLOLWLHVVHFWLRQVRIWKLVUHSRUW .H\)LQGLQJVW\SLFDOO\LQFOXGHUHSDLUVRUUHSODFHPHQWVRIGHILFLHQWLWHPVZLWKLQWKHILUVWILYH\HDUZLQGRZDVZHOODVWKHPRVW VLJQLILFDQW KLJKGROODU OLQH LWHPVWKDWIDOO DQ\ZKHUH ZLWKLQWKHWHQ\HDUWHUP 1RWHWKDW ZKLOHWKHUH LV VRPH VXEMHFWLYLW\ DVVRFLDWHGZLWKLGHQWLI\LQJWKH.H\)LQGLQJVWKH,PPHGLDWH1HHGVDUHDOZD\VLQFOXGHGDVDVXEVHW ([FHHGLQJO\$JHG
$IDLUO\ FRPPRQ VFHQDULR HQFRXQWHUHG GXULQJWKH DVVHVVPHQW SURFHVV DQG DIUHTXHQW VRXUFH RI GHEDWH RFFXUVZKHQ FODVVLI\LQJDQGGHVFULELQJ³YHU\ROG´V\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWDUHVWLOOIXQFWLRQLQJDGHTXDWHO\DQGGRQRWDSSHDUQRU ZHUHUHSRUWHGWREHLQDQ\ZD\GHILFLHQW7RKHOSSURYLGHVRPHDGGLWLRQDOLQWHOOLJHQFHRQWKHVHLWHPVVXFKFRPSRQHQWV ZLOOEHWDJJHGLQWKHGDWDEDVHDV([FHHGLQJO\$JHG7KLVGHVLJQDWLRQZLOOEHUHVHUYHGIRUPHFKDQLFDORUHOHFWULFDOV\VWHPV RUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWKDYHDJHGZHOOEH\RQGWKHLULQGXVWU\VWDQGDUGOLIHF\FOHVW\SLFDOO\DWOHDVW\HDUVEH\RQGDQGRUWZLFH WKHLU(VWLPDWHG8VHIXO/LIH
(8/
,QWDQGHPZLWKWKLVGHVLJQDWLRQWKHVHLWHPVZLOOEHDVVLJQHGD5HPDLQLQJ8VHIXO/LIH
58/
QRWOHVVWKDQWZR\HDUVEXWQRWJUHDWHUWKDQRIWKHLUVWDQGDUG(8/$VVXFKWKHUHFRPPHQGHGUHSODFHPHQWWLPH IRUWKHVHFRPSRQHQWVZLOOUHVLGHRXWVLGHWKHW\SLFDO6KRUW7HUPZLQGRZEXWZLOOQRWEHSXVKHGµLUUHVSRQVLEO\¶ WRRIDU
LQWR
WKHIXWXUH
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
* &HUWLILFDWLRQ
7KH&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
WKH&OLHQW
UHWDLQHG%XUHDX9HULWDVWRSHUIRUPWKLV)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQWLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWK LWVFRQWLQXHGRSHUDWLRQRI&KXUFK3DUNLQJ/RWDW(0RXQWDLQ9LHZ &XOOHQ$YH*OHQGRUD&$ WKH³3URSHUW\´,WLV
RXUXQGHUVWDQGLQJWKDWWKHSULPDU\LQWHUHVWRIWKH&OLHQWLVWRORFDWHDQGHYDOXDWHPDWHULDOVDQGEXLOGLQJV\VWHPGHIHFWVWKDW PLJKWVLJQLILFDQWO\DIIHFWWKHYDOXHRIWKHSURSHUW\DQGWRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHSUHVHQW3URSHUW\KDVFRQGLWLRQVWKDWZLOOKDYHD VLJQLILFDQWLPSDFWRQLWVFRQWLQXHGRSHUDWLRQV
7KLVUHSRUWKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGIRUDQGLVH[FOXVLYHO\IRUWKHXVHDQGEHQHILWRIWKH&OLHQWLGHQWLILHGRQWKHFRYHUSDJHRIWKLV UHSRUW7KHSXUSRVHIRUZKLFKWKLVUHSRUWVKDOOEHXVHGVKDOOEHOLPLWHGWRWKHXVHDVVWDWHGLQWKHFRQWUDFWEHWZHHQWKHFOLHQW DQG%XUHDX9HULWDV
7KLVUHSRUWRUDQ\RIWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGWKHUHLQLVQRWIRUWKHXVHRUEHQHILWRIQRUPD\LWEHUHOLHGXSRQE\DQ\ RWKHUSHUVRQRUHQWLW\IRUDQ\SXUSRVHZLWKRXWWKHDGYDQFHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI%XUHDX9HULWDV$Q\UHXVHRUGLVWULEXWLRQ ZLWKRXWVXFKFRQVHQWVKDOOEHDWWKHFOLHQW
VRUUHFLSLHQW
VVROHULVNZLWKRXWOLDELOLW\WR%XUHDX9HULWDV
7KHFRQFOXVLRQVDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVUHSRUWDUHEDVHGRQWKHEULHIUHYLHZRIWKHSODQVDQGUHFRUGVPDGH DYDLODEOH WR RXU 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU GXULQJ WKH VLWH YLVLW LQWHUYLHZV RI DYDLODEOH SURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHO DQG PDLQWHQDQFHFRQWUDFWRUVIDPLOLDUZLWKWKH3URSHUW\DSSURSULDWHLQTXLU\RIPXQLFLSDODXWKRULWLHVRXU3URMHFW0DQDJHU¶VZDON WKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVGXULQJWKHVLWHYLVLWDQGRXUH[SHULHQFHZLWKVLPLODUSURSHUWLHV 1RWHVWLQJH[SORUDWRU\SURELQJGLVPDQWOLQJRURSHUDWLQJRIHTXLSPHQWRULQGHSWKVWXGLHVZHUHSHUIRUPHGXQOHVVVSHFLILFDOO\ UHTXLUHGXQGHUWKHPurpose an ScopeVHFWLRQRIWKLVUHSRUW7KLVDVVHVVPHQWGLGQRWLQFOXGHHQJLQHHULQJFDOFXODWLRQVWR GHWHUPLQHWKHDGHTXDF\RIWKH3URSHUW\¶VRULJLQDOGHVLJQRUH[LVWLQJV\VWHPV$OWKRXJKZDONWKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVZHUH SHUIRUPHGQRWDOODUHDVPD\KDYHEHHQREVHUYHG
VHH6HFWLRQIRUVSHFLILFGHWDLOV
7KHUHPD\EHGHIHFWVLQWKH3URSHUW\
ZKLFKZHUHLQDUHDVQRWREVHUYHGRUUHDGLO\DFFHVVLEOHPD\QRWKDYHEHHQYLVLEOHRUZHUHQRWGLVFORVHGE\PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHOZKHQTXHVWLRQHG7KHUHSRUWGHVFULEHVSURSHUW\FRQGLWLRQVDWWKHWLPHWKDWWKHREVHUYDWLRQVDQGUHVHDUFKZHUH FRQGXFWHG
3UHSDUHGE\
$OYDUR%HGR\D
3URMHFW$VVHVVRU
5HYLHZHGE\
0DU\9HQDEOH&(05$
3URJUDP0DQDJHU
0DU\YHQDEOH#EXUHDXYHULWDVFRP
[
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
+ $SSHQGLFHV
$SSHQGL[$
3KRWRJUDSKLF5HFRUG
$SSHQGL[%
6LWH3ODQ
$SSHQGL[&
3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
$SSHQGL['
$FFHVVLELOLW\5HYLHZDQG3KRWRV
$SSHQGL[(
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
$SSHQGL[)
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
$SSHQGL[*
2EVHUYDWLRQ*360DS/LQNV
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[$
3KRWRJUDSKLF5HFRUG
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP _S
3$5.,1*/27&251(59,(: 29(59,(::(6772($67
29(59,(:($6772:(67 29(59,(:1257+726287+
3$5.%(1&+(6 /,*+7,1*&21752/$1',55,*$7,213$1(/6 &+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP _S
&21&5(7(3$7+ %8667236+$'(6758&785(
02180(17$/6,*1$*( 32/(/('/,*+7),;785(
75$6+5(&(37$&/( %,.(5$&.
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[%
6LWH3ODQ
6LWH3ODQ
3URMHFW1XPEHU 3URMHFW1DPH
5 &KXUFK3DUNLQJ/RW
6RXUFH 2Q6LWH'DWH
*RRJOH(DUWK3UR 1RYHPEHU
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[&
3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
%XLOGLQJ)DFLOLW\1DPH
&KXUFK3DUNLQJ/RW
1DPHRISHUVRQFRPSOHWLQJIRUP
7LWOH$VVRFLDWLRQZSURSHUW\
/HQJWKRIWLPHDVVRFLDWHGZSURSHUW\
'DWH&RPSOHWHG
3KRQH1XPEHU
%9)$&,/,7<&21',7,21$66(660(17
35(6859(<48(67,211$,5(
0HWKRGRI&RPSOHWLRQ
,1&203/(7(FOLHQW32&XQZLOOLQJRUXQDEOHWRFRPSOHWH 7KH3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUHZDVQRWILOOHGRXWHLWKHUSULRUWRRUGXULQJWKHDVVHVVPHQW Signature of Assessor Signature of POC
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL['
$FFHVVLELOLW\5HYLHZDQG3KRWRV
9LVXDO6XUYH\$'$6WDQGDUGVIRU$FFHVVLEOH'HVLJQ 0DMRU,VVXHV
$'$VWXG\
UHFRPPHQGHG
0RGHUDWH,VVXHV
$'$VWXG\
UHFRPPHQGHG
&DWHJRU\ 0LQRU,VVXHV
&KXUFK3DUNLQJ/RW
$FFHVVLELOLW\,VVXHV
3DUNLQJ
([WHULRU$FFHVVLEOH5RXWH
%XLOGLQJ(QWUDQFHV
,QWHULRU$FFHVVLEOH5RXWH
(OHYDWRUV
3XEOLF5HVWURRPV
.LWFKHQV.LWFKHQHWWHV
3OD\JURXQGV 6ZLPPLQJ
3RROV
2WKHU
1RQH
*be cognizant that if the “None” box is checked that does not guarantee full compliance; this study is limited in nature )DFLOLW\+LVWRU\ ,QWHUYLHZ
4XHVWLRQ <HV 1R 8QN &RPPHQWV
+DVDQDFFHVVLELOLW\VWXG\EHHQSUHYLRXVO\
SHUIRUPHG",IVRZKHQ"
+DYHDQ\$'$LPSURYHPHQWVEHHQPDGHWR
WKHSURSHUW\VLQFHRULJLQDOFRQVWUXFWLRQ"
'HVFULEH
+DVEXLOGLQJPDQDJHPHQWUHSRUWHGDQ\
DFFHVVLELOLW\EDVHGFRPSODLQWVRUOLWLJDWLRQ"
3URSHUW\1DPH
%93URMHFW1XPEHU
&KXUFK3DUNLQJ/RW
5
&KXUFK3DUNLQJ/RW
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
29(59,(:2)$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1*$5($ &/26(832)67$//
$&&(66,%/(5$03 $&&(66,%/(3$7+
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[(
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[)
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
&+85&+3$5.,1*/27 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
$SSHQGL[*
2EVHUYDWLRQ*360DS/LQNV
Component Description Attributes Action Description Location Description Condition Latitude Longitude GPS Map Link Plan Type Helper Label Effective Age Lifespan RUL Fiscal Year Observed Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Barcode Comments Public Park Name AssetCALC ID Irrigation System Control Panel Replace Site Fair 34.137972 Ͳ117.858971 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.137972,Ͳ117.858971 Lifecycle/Renewal Irrigation System, Control Panel, Replace 8 15 7 1 5415 5415 002422 Church Parking Lot 7049655 Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement Replace/Install Site Good 34.138323 Ͳ117.858198 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138323,Ͳ117.858198 Lifecycle/Renewal Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps, any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement, 400 W, Replace/Install 5 20 15 1 7364.4 7364.4 002469 Church Parking Lot 7049654 Irrigation System Drip System Replace/Install Site Fair 34.137991 Ͳ117.858988 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.137991,Ͳ117.858988 Lifecycle/Renewal Irrigation System, Drip System, Replace/Install 12 20 8 7500 3.249 24367.5 Church Parking Lot 7049657Bus Stop MetalͲFramed, Standard Replace Site Fair 34.137941 Ͳ117.858759 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.137941,Ͳ117.858759 Lifecycle/Renewal Shade Structure, MetalͲFramed, Standard, Replace 15 30 15 32 162.45 5198.4 002407 Church Parking Lot 7049656Parking Lots Pavement, Asphalt Mill & Overlay Site Fair 34.138080 Ͳ117.858853 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138080,Ͳ117.858853 Lifecycle/Renewal Parking Lots, Pavement, Asphalt, Mill & Overlay 15 25 10 4150 3.7905 15730.575 Church Parking Lot 7049647Bus stop MetalͲFramed, Standard Replace Site Fair 34.137977 Ͳ117.858563 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.137977,Ͳ117.858563 Lifecycle/Renewal Shade Structure, MetalͲFramed, Standard, Replace 15 30 15 32 162.45 5198.4 002406 Church Parking Lot 7049652 Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement Replace/Install Site Good 34.138019 Ͳ117.858663 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138019,Ͳ117.858663 Lifecycle/Renewal Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps, any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement, 400 W, Replace/Install 5 20 15 1 7364.4 7364.4 002405 Church Parking Lot 7049653 Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement Replace/Install Site Good 34.138175 Ͳ117.858460 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138175,Ͳ117.858460 Lifecycle/Renewal Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps, any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement, 400 W, Replace/Install 5 20 15 1 7364.4 7364.4 002468 Church Parking Lot 7049649Trash Receptacle MediumͲDuty Metal or Precast Replace Site Fair 34.138087 Ͳ117.858956 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138087,Ͳ117.858956 Lifecycle/Renewal Trash Receptacle, MediumͲDuty Metal or Precast, Replace 11 20 9 1 758.1 758.1 002355 Church Parking Lot 7049645 Park Bench Metal PowderͲCoated Replace Site Fair 34.137993 Ͳ117.858988 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.137993,Ͳ117.858988 Lifecycle/Renewal Park Bench, Metal PowderͲCoated, Replace 11 20 9 1 758.1 758.1 002353 Church Parking Lot 7049648 Park Bench Metal PowderͲCoated Replace Site Fair 34.138005 Ͳ117.858991 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138005,Ͳ117.858991 Lifecycle/Renewal Park Bench, Metal PowderͲCoated, Replace 11 20 9 1 758.1 758.1 002354 Church Parking Lot 7049650Signage Property, Monument Replace/Install Site Good 34.137982 Ͳ117.859186 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.137982,Ͳ117.859186 Lifecycle/Renewal Signage, Property, Monument, Replace/Install 8 20 12 1 3249 3249 002352 Church Parking Lot 7049651 Bike Rack Fixed 1Ͳ5 Bikes Replace Site Fair 34.138016 Ͳ117.858702 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138016,Ͳ117.858702 Lifecycle/Renewal Bike Rack, Fixed 1Ͳ5 Bikes, Replace 15 20 5 1 649.8 649.8 Church Parking Lot 7052362Lighting Controls Dimming Panel, Digital Time Control Clock & Photosensor Replace Site Fair 34.138154 Ͳ117.858940 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138154,Ͳ117.858940 Lifecycle/Renewal Lighting Controls, Dimming Panel, Digital Time Control Clock & Photosensor, Replace 10 20 10 1 5068.44 5068.44 002421 Church Parking Lot 7049644 Sidewalk Concrete, Small Areas/Sections Replace Site Good 34.138095 Ͳ117.858795 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.138095,Ͳ117.858795 Lifecycle/Renewal Sidewalk, Concrete, Small Areas/Sections, Replace 20 50 30 940 21.66 20360.4 Church Parking Lot 7049646 1 of 1
&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ
$,1
1RUWK/RUDLQH$YHQXH
*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
)$&,/,7<&21',7,21$66(660(17
35(3$5('%<
ureau eritas
Uni ersit oule ar Suite
llicott Cit ar lan
www us bureau eritas co
%9&217$&7
ar enable C A
Progra anager
ar enable bureau eritas co
%9352-(&7
'$7(2)5(3257
anuar
216,7('$7(
No e ber
prepare for
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
(DVW)RRWKLOO%RXOHYDUG
*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
0LFKDHO6OHGG
Bureau Veritas
8QLYHUVLW\%RXOHYDUG6XLWH_(OOLFRWW&LW\0DU\ODQG_ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S &,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7 5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
7$%/(2)&217(176
$ %DVHEDOO)LHOG([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\ $ %DVHEDOO)LHOG2YHUYLHZDQG$VVHVVPHQW'HWDLOV $ %DVHEDOO)LHOG6WRS)LQGLQJVDQG'HILFLHQFLHV % $PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH % 3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWKRGRORJ\ % )LHOG3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWULFV % 3ODQ7\SHV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% ,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% .H\)LQGLQJV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% %DVHEDOO)LHOG
% *HQHUDO6LWH & 3URSHUW\6SDFH8VHDQG2EVHUYHG$UHDV ' $'$$FFHVVLELOLW\ ( 3XUSRVHDQG6FRSH ) 2SLQLRQVRI3UREDEOH&RVWV * 0HWKRGRORJ\ * 'HILQLWLRQV * &HUWLILFDWLRQ + $SSHQGLFHV
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$ %DVHEDOO)LHOG([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\
$ %DVHEDOO)LHOG2YHUYLHZDQG$VVHVVPHQW'HWDLOV
*HQHUDO,QIRUPDWLRQ
3DUN7\SH %DVHEDOO)LHOG
1XPEHURI%XLOGLQJV $QFLOODU\EXLOGLQJ
0DLQ$GGUHVV 1RUWK/RUDLQH$YHQXH*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
6LWH'HYHORSHG
HVWLPDWHG
6LWH$UHD DFUHV
HVWLPDWHG
3DUNLQJ6SDFHV WRWDOVSDFHVDOOLQRSHQORWV
RIZKLFKDUHDFFHVVLEOH
2XWVLGH2FFXSDQWV/HDVHG6SDFHV 1RQH
'DWH
V
RI9LVLW 1RYHPEHU
0DQDJHPHQW3RLQWRI&RQWDFW 0LFKDHO6OHGG$VVLVWDQW3XEOLF:RUNV'LUHFWRU &LW\RI*OHQGRUD
PVOHGG#FLW\RIJOHQGRUDRUJ
2QVLWH3RLQWRI&RQWDFW
32&
8QHVFRUWHG
$VVHVVPHQWDQG5HSRUW3UHSDUHG%\ $OYDUR%HGR\D
5HYLHZHG%\ 0DU\9HQDEOH&(05$
3URJUDP0DQDJHU
0DU\YHQDEOH#EXUHDXYHULWDVFRP
[
$VVHW&DOF/LQN )XOOGDWDVHWIRUWKLVDVVHVVPHQWFDQEHIRXQGDW
KWWSV
ZZZDVVHWFDOFQHW
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$ %DVHEDOO)LHOG6WRS)LQGLQJVDQG'HILFLHQFLHV
+LVWRULFDO6XPPDU\
7KHEDVHEDOOILHOGDW*HRUJH0DQRRVKLDQ3DUNLQ*OHQGRUDZDVRULJLQDOO\HVWDEOLVKHGLQWKH
VDQGKDVQRWVHHQDQ\
UHQRYDWLRQVVLQFHLWVLQFHSWLRQ7KHUHLVQR UHFRUGHGHYLGHQFHRILPSURYHPHQWVDQGQRLQIRUPDWLRQKDVEHHQSURYLGHG UHJDUGLQJDQ\XSJUDGHVRUHQKDQFHPHQWV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
7KHVLWHLVHVVHQWLDOO\DEDVHEDOOILHOGHTXLSSHGZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGQHFHVVLWLHVIRUEDVHEDOOSUDFWLFHLQFOXGLQJDIHQFHGILHOG IRXOSROHVDVFRUHERDUGDQGWZRGXJRXWV²RQHIRUWKHKRPHWHDPDQGDQRWKHUIRUWKHYLVLWLQJWHDP7KHUHDUHDOVRWZR VHDWLQJVHFWLRQVIRUVSHFWDWRUV$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHILHOGIHDWXUHVDSDUNLQJDUHDRQLWVZHVWVLGHEDVLFOLJKWLQJDQGILQDOO\ VLWXDWHGEHKLQGKRPHSODWHDVPDOODQFLOODU\EXLOGLQJXWLOL]HGIRUVWRUDJHZKLFKFRXOGQRWEHDFFHVVHG7KHFRPSRQHQWV DUHJHQHUDOO\LQIDLUFRQGLWLRQ7KHSDUNLQJORWVWULSLQJLVIDGHGDQGWKHUHDUHSUHYLRXVO\VHDOHGORQJLWXGLQDOFUDFNVDQG GHWHULRUDWHGSRUWLRQVRIWKHDVSKDOWVXUIDFH0LOOLQJDQGRYHUOD\LQJRIWKHSDUNLQJORWDORQJZLWKDVHDOFRDWDQGQHZVWULSLQJ LVUHFRPPHQGHG
$UFKLWHFWXUDO
7KH%DVHEDOO)LHOGFRQWDLQVQRVWUXFWXUHVRUVLJQLILFDQWEXLOWDVVHWV 0HFKDQLFDO(OHFWULFDO3OXPELQJDQG)LUH
0(3)
7KH0(3)
0HFKDQLFDO(OHFWULFDO3OXPELQJ DQG)LUH3URWHFWLRQ
FRPSRQHQWVIRUWKH0DQRRVKLDQ &LW\%DVHEDOO )LHOG
SULPDULO\LQYROYHWKHHOHFWULFDODVSHFWFDWHULQJWRWKHOLJKWLQJDQGVFRUHERDUG/RFDWHGRQWKHQRUWKVLGHRIWKHSURSHUW\ WKHUHLVDEDFNIORZSUHYHQWHU+RZHYHULWLVZRUWKQRWLQJWKDWWKHILHOGODFNVLUULJDWLRQDQGZDWHUIRXQWDLQV 5HFRPPHQGHG$GGLWLRQDO6WXGLHV
1RDGGLWLRQDOVWXGLHVUHFRPPHQGHGDWWKLVWLPH
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% $PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% 3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWKRGRORJ\
%DVHEDOO)LHOG&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
DQG$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
$ PDMRU JRDO RI WKH )DFLOLW\ &RQGLWLRQ $VVHVVPHQW )&$
LV WR EHQFKPDUN LQGLYLGXDO SDUNV ZLWK RWKHU SDUNV ZLWKLQ WKH SRUWIROLRDQGDPHQLWLHVZLWKRWKHUDPHQLWLHVHLWKHUZLWKLQWKHVDPHSDUNDQGDFURVVWKHSRUWIROLR7RDFKLHYHDUDWLQJIRU HDFKSDUNWKH3DUN&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
LVGHYHORSHG
VLPLODUO\DQ$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
LVXVHGWRFRPSDUH
DPHQLWLHV
7RDVVLVWLQWKHRYHUDOOSULRULWL]DWLRQHIIRUWWKHIROORZLQJWHUPVDUHXVHGDWWKH&RPSRQHQWDQG$PHQLW\OHYHO
&RPSRQHQW
LQGLYLGXDO HOHPHQWV RI WKH DPHQLW\ RU SDUN WKDW DUH HYDOXDWHG DQG DVVLJQHG FRQGLWLRQV DQG *36 FRRUGLQDWHV([DPSOHVRIFRPSRQHQWVLQFOXGHEHQFKHVWUDVKUHFHSWDFOHVWHQQLVQHWVSOD\JURXQGVXUIDFHVRUVSOLWUDLO IHQFLQJ
$PHQLW\
GHILQHGDVDJURXSRIFRPSRQHQWVWKDWFRQVWLWXWHDPDMRUIHDWXUHRIWKHSDUNORJLFDOO\JURXSHGWRJHWKHUE\ SXUSRVHDQGRUSUR[LPLW\([DPSOHVRIDQDPHQLW\LQFOXGHDEDVNHWEDOOFRXUWDVRIWEDOOILHOGDGRJSDUNSLFQLFDUHDRU SOD\JURXQG
&XUUHQW5HQHZDO9DOXH
&59
WKHFRVWLQWRGD\¶VGROODUVRIWKHPDMRUFRQVWLWXHQWSDUWVWKDWPDNHXSWKHZKROH
IRU3DUNV
&59 UHQHZDOFRVWRIDOOGHYHORSHGDPHQLWLHVZLWKLQLW ODQGYDOXHLVH[FOXGHG
IRU$PHQLWLHV
&59 UHQHZDOFRVWRIDOOVLJQLILFDQWFRPSRQHQWVZLWKLQLW &,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
7KH$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
LVDVFRUHFDOFXODWHGIURPDQDOJRULWKPFRPSULVLQJDZHLJKWHGDYHUDJHRIWKHFRQGLWLRQV RIDOOWKHFRPSRQHQWVZLWKLQLW
$0(1,7< &21',7,21 6&25(
$&6
)2508/$ 680 > 5HPDLQLQJ 9DOXH 5HQHZDO 9DOXH 5HQ9
RI FRPELQHG
FRPSRQHQWV@
5HPDLQLQJYDOXH 5HQ9PXOWLSOLHGE\58/(8/
7KH3DUN&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
LVWKHWRWDOVFRUHIRUDVLQJOHSDUNSURSHUW\FDOFXODWHGIURPWKHVXPRIWKH$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ 6FRUHV
$&6V
IRUHDFKDPHQLW\ZLWKLQWKHSDUN
3$5.&21',7,216&25()2508/$ 680>5HPDLQLQJ9DOXH@680>5HQHZDO9DOXH@
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% )LHOG3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWULFV
3DUN&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
DQG$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
$ PDMRU JRDO RI WKH )DFLOLW\ &RQGLWLRQ $VVHVVPHQW )&$
LV WR EHQFKPDUN LQGLYLGXDO SDUNV ZLWK RWKHU SDUNV ZLWKLQ WKH SRUWIROLRDQGDPHQLWLHVZLWKRWKHUDPHQLWLHVHLWKHUZLWKLQWKHVDPHSDUNDQGDFURVVWKHSRUWIROLR7RDFKLHYHDUDWLQJIRU HDFKSDUNWKH3DUN&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
LVGHYHORSHG
VLPLODUO\DQ$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
LVXVHGWRFRPSDUH
DPHQLWLHV
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
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% 3ODQ7\SHV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
(DFKOLQHLWHPLQWKHFRVWGDWDEDVHLVDVVLJQHGD3ODQ7\SHZKLFKLVWKHSULPDU\UHDVRQIRUWKHUHFRPPHQGHGUHSODFHPHQW UHSDLURURWKHUFRUUHFWLYHDFWLRQ$FRVWRUOLQHLWHPPD\FRPPRQO\KDYHPRUHWKDQRQHDSSOLFDEOH3ODQ7\SH KRZHYHU
RQO\RQH3ODQ7\SHZLOOEHDVVLJQHGEDVHGRQWKHEHVWILWW\SLFDOO\WKHRQHZLWKWKHJUHDWHVWVLJQLILFDQFH6HHWKHPurpose GHVFULSWLRQLQWKHPurpose an ScopeVHFWLRQIRUDQH[SODQDWLRQRI&RPSRQHQW7\SH 3ODQ7\SH'HVFULSWLRQV
6DIHW\
$QREVHUYHGRUUHSRUWHGXQVDIHFRQGLWLRQWKDWLIOHIWXQDGGUHVVHGFRXOGUHVXOWLQ LQMXU\
DV\VWHPRUFRPSRQHQWWKDWSUHVHQWVSRWHQWLDOOLDELOLW\ULVN 3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPKDVIDLOHGLVDOPRVWIDLOLQJSHUIRUPVXQUHOLDEO\GRHVQRW SHUIRUPDVLQWHQGHGDQGRUSRVHVULVNWRRYHUDOOV\VWHPVWDELOLW\ $FFHVVLELOLW\ 'RHVQRWPHHW$'$8)$6DQGRURWKHUDFFHVVLELOLW\UHTXLUHPHQWV (QYLURQPHQWDO ,PSURYHPHQWVWRDLUZDWHURUVRLOTXDOLW\LQFOXGLQJUHPRYDORIKD]DUGRXV PDWHULDOVIURPWKHVLWH
5HWURILW$GDSWDWLRQ &RPSRQHQWVV\VWHPVRUVSDFHVUHFRPPHQGHGIRUXSJUDGHVLQLQRUGHUWRPHHW FXUUHQWVWDQGDUGVIDFLOLW\XVDJHRUFOLHQWRFFXSDQWQHHGV /LIHF\FOH5HQHZDO $Q\FRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPWKDWLVQRWFXUUHQWO\GHILFLHQWRUSUREOHPDWLFEXWIRU ZKLFKIXWXUHUHSODFHPHQWRUUHSDLULVDQWLFLSDWHGDQGEXGJHWHG 3ODQ7\SH'LVWULEXWLRQ
E\&RVW
±7LPHIUDPH<HDUV
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% ,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
,PPHGLDWH 1HHGV DUH OLQH LWHPV WKDW UHTXLUH LPPHGLDWH DFWLRQ DV D UHVXOW RI
PDWHULDO H[LVWLQJ RU SRWHQWLDO XQVDIH
FRQGLWLRQV
IDLOHGRULPPLQHQWIDLOXUHRIPLVVLRQFULWLFDOEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVRU
FRQGLWLRQVWKDWLIQRW
DGGUHVVHGKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHVXOWLQRUFRQWULEXWHWRFULWLFDOHOHPHQWRUV\VWHPIDLOXUHZLWKLQRQH\HDURUZLOOPRVW SUREDEO\UHVXOWLQDVLJQLILFDQWHVFDODWLRQRILWVUHPHGLDOFRVW )RU GDWDEDVH DQG UHSRUWLQJ SXUSRVHV WKH OLQH LWHPV ZLWK 58/ DQG FRPPRQO\ DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK Safet RU Perfor ance ntegrit 3ODQ7\SHVDUHFRQVLGHUHG,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% .H\)LQGLQJV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJVW\SLFDOO\LQFOXGHUHSDLUVRUUHSODFHPHQWVRIGHILFLHQWLWHPVZLWKLQWKHILUVWILYH\HDUZLQGRZDVZHOODVWKHPRVW VLJQLILFDQW KLJKGROODU OLQH LWHPV WKDW IDOO DQ\ZKHUH ZLWKLQ WKH WHQ\HDU WHUP 1RWH WKDW ZKLOH WKHUH LV VRPH VXEMHFWLYLW\ DVVRFLDWHGZLWKLGHQWLI\LQJWKH.H\)LQGLQJVWKH,PPHGLDWH1HHGVDUHDOZD\VLQFOXGHGDVDVXEVHW 7KHQXPHULFDOVFRULQJRIFRQGLWLRQDVVKRZQLQWKH.H\)LQGLQJVLVEDVHGRQDVFDOHDVLOOXVWUDWHGEHORZ
5HSODFHPHQWKDVQRQHRUYHU\ORZLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQV ±5HSODFHPHQWKDVORZLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQV
5HSODFHPHQWKDVPHGLXPLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQ )DLOLQJVDIHW\RUFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWFRPSRQHQWZLWKKLJKLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQV 3DUNLQJ/RWVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
3DYHPHQW$VSKDOW
&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ6LWH
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
6HDODQG6WULSHLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
6WULSLQJLVIDGHG$VVHW&$/&,'
3DUNLQJ/RWVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
3DYHPHQW$VSKDOW
&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ6LWH
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
0LOODQG2YHUOD\LQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
6XUIDFHGHWHULRUDWLRQVHDOHGORQJLWXGLQDOFUDFNV$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% %DVHEDOO)LHOG
*HQHUDO,QIRUPDWLRQ
$VVHW7\SH %DVHEDOO)LHOG
$VVHW/RFDWLRQ 1RUWK/RUDLQH$YHQXH*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ )DLU
Co ponent escription uantit Con ition
/DQGVFDSLQJDQG
7RSRJUDSK\ /LPLWHGODQGVFDSLQJIHDWXUHV
LUULJDWLRQQRWSUHVHQW
6WRUP:DWHU
0DQDJHPHQW 6XUIDFHGUDLQDJHWRGHYHORSHGVXUURXQGLQJV $FFHVVLELOLW\
3RWHQWLDODFFHVVLELOLW\LVVXHVZHUHQRWREVHUYHGDWWKLVDVVHW 5HIHUWR$SSHQGL['IRUPRUHGHWDLOV
.H\,VVXHVDQG
)LQGLQJV 1RQH
%DVHEDOOGLDPRQGV
Co ponent escription uantit Con ition
%OHDFKHUV )L[HG6WHHO)UDPH$OXPLQXP%HQFKHV
SHU
6HDW
5HSODFH ($ )DLU
)HQFHV *DWHV )HQFH&KDLQ/LQN
5HSODFH /) )DLU
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
*HQHUDO,QIRUPDWLRQ
6SRUWV
$SSDUDWXV %DVHEDOO)RXO3ROH5HSODFH ($ )DLU
3DUNLQJ/RWV 3DYHPHQW$VSKDOW0LOODQG2YHUOD\
6) )DLU
%DFNIORZ
3UHYHQWHU 'RPHVWLF:DWHU5HSODFH ($ )DLU
6LWH/LJKW3ROH
+HLJKWZLWKRXW%DVHRU)L[WXUHV
5HSODFH,QVWDOO ($ )DLU
$QFLOODU\
%XLOGLQJ &08%DVLF0LQLPDO5HSODFH 6) )DLU
)HQFHVDQG
*DWHV )HQFH&KDLQ/LQN
5HSODFH /) )DLU
6SRUWV
$SSDUDWXV 3OD\HU'XJRXW%HQFKHV
/HQJWK5HSODFH ($ )DLU
([WHULRU)L[WXUH
ZLWK/DPS DQ\W\SHZLWK/('5HSODFHPHQW5HSODFH ($ )DLU 3ROH/LJKW
)L[WXUHZLWK/DPSV
DQ\W\SH
+LJKZLWK/('5HSODFHPHQW
5HSODFH,QVWDOO ($ )DLU
6SRUWV
$SSDUDWXV %DVHEDOO%DFNVWRS&KDLQ/LQN5HSODFH ($ )DLU 6SRUWV
$SSDUDWXV %DVHEDOO)RRWEDOO3URWHFWLYH1HWWLQJ5HSODFH 6) )DLU 2XWGRRU
6SHFWDWRU6HDWLQJ
%OHDFKHUV$OXPLQXP%HQFKHV
SHU6HDW
5HSODFH ($ )DLU
%LNH5DFN 3RUWDEOH%LNHV5HSODFH ($ )DLU )ODJSROH 0HWDO5HSODFH ($ )DLU
5RRILQJ 0HWDO5HSODFH 6) )DLU
([WHULRU'RRU 6WHHO6WDQGDUG5HSODFH ($ )DLU &,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
*HQHUDO,QIRUPDWLRQ
6SRUWV
$SSDUDWXV 6FRUHERDUG(OHFWURQLF6WDQGDUG5HSODFH ($ )DLU % *HQHUDO6LWH
*HQHUDO6LWH
$VVHW7\SH 3DUNLQJ/RW
$VVHW/RFDWLRQ (DVWSRUWLRQRIVLWH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ 3RRU
Co ponent escription uantit Con ition
3DUNLQJ/RWV 3DYHPHQW$VSKDOW0LOODQG2YHUOD\
6) 3RRU
3DUNLQJ/RWV 3DYHPHQW$VSKDOW6HDODQG6WULSH
6) 3RRU
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
& 3URSHUW\6SDFH8VHDQG2EVHUYHG$UHDV
$UHDV2EVHUYHG
0RVWRIWKHILHOGZDVREVHUYHGLQRUGHUWRJDLQDFOHDUXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIWKHSURSHUW\¶VRYHUDOOFRQGLWLRQ2WKHUDUHDV DFFHVVHGLQFOXGHGWKHVLWHZLWKLQWKHSURSHUW\ERXQGDULHVWKHH[WHULRURIWKHSURSHUW\ .H\6SDFHV1RW2EVHUYHG
$UHDVRIQRWHWKDWZHUHHLWKHULQDFFHVVLEOHRUQRWREVHUYHGIRURWKHUUHDVRQVDUHOLVWHGKHUH
$QFLOODU\VWRUDJHEXLOGLQJ
ORFNHGQRNH\
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
' $'$$FFHVVLELOLW\
*HQHUDOO\7LWOH,,RIWKH$PHULFDQVZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW $'$
SURKLELWVGLVFULPLQDWLRQE\HQWLWLHVWRDFFHVVDQGXVHRI³DUHDV RISXEOLFDFFRPPRGDWLRQV´DQG³SXEOLFIDFLOLWLHV´RQWKHEDVLVRIGLVDELOLW\5HJDUGOHVVRIWKHLUDJHWKHVHDUHDVDQGIDFLOLWLHV PXVWEHPDLQWDLQHGDQGRSHUDWHGWRFRPSO\ZLWKWKH$PHULFDQVZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW$FFHVVLELOLW\*XLGHOLQHV $'$$*
$SXEOLFHQWLW\
LHFLW\JRYHUQPHQWV
VKDOORSHUDWHHDFKVHUYLFHSURJUDPRUDFWLYLW\VRWKDWWKHVHUYLFHSURJUDPRUDFWLYLW\ ZKHQYLHZHGLQLWVHQWLUHW\LVUHDGLO\DFFHVVLEOHWRDQGXVDEOHE\LQGLYLGXDOVZLWKGLVDELOLWLHV +RZHYHUWKLVGRHVQRW
1HFHVVDULO\UHTXLUHDSXEOLFHQWLW\WRPDNHHDFKRILWVH[LVWLQJIDFLOLWLHVDFFHVVLEOHWRDQGXVDEOHE\LQGLYLGXDOVZLWK
GLVDELOLWLHV
5HTXLUHDSXEOLFHQWLW\WRWDNHDQ\DFWLRQWKDWZRXOGWKUHDWHQRUGHVWUR\WKHKLVWRULFVLJQLILFDQFHRIDQKLVWRULFSURSHUW\
RU
5HTXLUHDSXEOLFHQWLW\WRWDNHDQ\DFWLRQWKDWLWFDQGHPRQVWUDWHZRXOGUHVXOWLQDIXQGDPHQWDODOWHUDWLRQLQWKHQDWXUH RI D VHUYLFH SURJUDP RU DFWLYLW\ RU LQ XQGXH ILQDQFLDO DQG DGPLQLVWUDWLYH EXUGHQV ,Q WKRVH FLUFXPVWDQFHV ZKHUH SHUVRQQHORIWKHSXEOLFHQWLW\EHOLHYHWKDWWKHSURSRVHGDFWLRQZRXOGIXQGDPHQWDOO\DOWHUWKHVHUYLFHSURJUDPRUDFWLYLW\ RUZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQGXHILQDQFLDODQGDGPLQLVWUDWLYHEXUGHQVDSXEOLFHQWLW\KDVWKHEXUGHQRISURYLQJWKDWFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK
D
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
7KLVVXUYH\ZDVYLVXDOLQQDWXUHDQGDFWXDOPHDVXUHPHQWVZHUHQRWWDNHQWRYHULI\FRPSOLDQFH 2QO\DUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDPSOHRIDUHDVZDVREVHUYHG
7ZRRYHUYLHZSKRWRVZHUHWDNHQIRUHDFKVXEVHFWLRQUHJDUGOHVVRISHUFHLYHGFRPSOLDQFHRUQRQFRPSOLDQFH ,WHPL]HGFRVWVIRULQGLYLGXDOQRQFRPSOLDQWLWHPVDUHQRWLQFOXGHGLQWKHGDWDVHW )RUDQ\³QRQH´ER[HVFKHFNHGRUUHIHUHQFHWR³QRLVVXHV´LGHQWLILHGWKDWDORQHGRHVQRWJXDUDQWHHIXOOFRPSOLDQFH 7KH EDVHEDOO ILHOG ZDV RULJLQDOO\ HVWLPDWHG FRQVWUXFWHG LQ
V 7KH EDVHEDOO ILHOG KDV QRW VLQFH EHHQ VXEVWDQWLDOO\ UHQRYDWHG
1R GHWDLOHG IROORZXS DFFHVVLELOLW\ VWXGLHV DUH LQFOXGHG DV UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV VLQFH QR PDMRU RU PRGHUDWH LVVXHV ZHUH LGHQWLILHG DW DQ\ RI WKH SDUN DPHQLWLHV DQG IDFLOLWLHV 5HIHUHQFH WKH DSSHQGL[ IRU VSHFLILF GDWD SKRWRV DQG WDEOHV RU FKHFNOLVWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKLVOLPLWHGDFFHVVLELOLW\VXUYH\ &,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
( 3XUSRVHDQG6FRSH
3XUSRVH
%XUHDX9HULWDVZDVUHWDLQHGE\WKHFOLHQWWRUHQGHUDQRSLQLRQDVWRWKH3URSHUW\¶VFXUUHQWJHQHUDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQRQWKH GD\RIWKHVLWHYLVLW
%DVHG RQ WKH REVHUYDWLRQV LQWHUYLHZV DQG GRFXPHQW UHYLHZ RXWOLQHG EHORZ WKLV UHSRUW LGHQWLILHV VLJQLILFDQW GHIHUUHG PDLQWHQDQFHLVVXHVH[LVWLQJGHILFLHQFLHVDQGPDWHULDOFRGHYLRODWLRQVRIUHFRUGZKLFKDIIHFWWKH3URSHUW\¶VXVH2SLQLRQV DUHUHQGHUHGDVWRLWVVWUXFWXUDOLQWHJULW\EXLOGLQJV\VWHPFRQGLWLRQDQGWKH3URSHUW\¶VRYHUDOOFRQGLWLRQ7KHUHSRUWDOVR QRWHVFRQVWUXFWLRQV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWKDYHUHDOL]HGRUH[FHHGHGWKHLUW\SLFDOH[SHFWHGXVHIXOOLYHV 7KHSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQRIFRQVWUXFWLRQV\VWHPVDQGUHODWHGFRPSRQHQWVDUHW\SLFDOO\GHILQHGDVEHLQJLQRQHRIILYHFRQGLWLRQ UDWLQJV)RUWKHSXUSRVHVRIWKLVUHSRUWWKHIROORZLQJGHILQLWLRQVDUHXVHG
&RQGLWLRQ5DWLQJV
([FHOOHQW 1HZRUYHU\FORVHWRQHZ
FRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPW\SLFDOO\KDVEHHQLQVWDOOHGZLWKLQWKHSDVW \HDUVRXQGDQGSHUIRUPLQJLWVIXQFWLRQ(YHQWXDOUHSDLURUUHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGZKHQ WKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPHLWKHUUHDFKHVWKHHQGRILWVXVHIXOOLIHRUIDLOVLQVHUYLFH *RRG 6DWLVIDFWRU\DVLV&RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPLVVRXQGDQGSHUIRUPLQJLWVIXQFWLRQW\SLFDOO\ZLWKLQ WKHILUVWWKLUGRILWVOLIHF\FOH+RZHYHULWPD\VKRZPLQRUVLJQVRIQRUPDOZHDUDQGWHDU5HSDLU RUUHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGZKHQWKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPHLWKHUUHDFKHVWKHHQGRILWV XVHIXOOLIHRUIDLOVLQVHUYLFH
)DLU 6KRZLQJ VLJQV RI ZHDU DQG XVH EXW VWLOO VDWLVIDFWRU\ DVLVW\SLFDOO\ QHDUWKHPHGLDQ RI LWV HVWLPDWHGXVHIXOOLIH&RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPLVSHUIRUPLQJDGHTXDWHO\DWWKLVWLPHEXWPD\ H[KLELWVRPHVLJQVRIZHDUGHIHUUHGPDLQWHQDQFHRUHYLGHQFHRISUHYLRXVUHSDLUV5HSDLURU UHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGGXHWRWKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHP¶VFRQGLWLRQDQGRULWVHVWLPDWHG UHPDLQLQJXVHIXOOLIH
3RRU &RPSRQHQW RU V\VWHP LV VLJQLILFDQWO\ DJHGIODZHGIXQFWLRQLQJLQWHUPLWWHQWO\ RU XQUHOLDEO\
GLVSOD\V REYLRXV VLJQV RI GHIHUUHG PDLQWHQDQFH
VKRZV HYLGHQFH RI SUHYLRXV UHSDLU RU
ZRUNPDQVKLSQRWLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKFRPPRQO\DFFHSWHGVWDQGDUGV KDVEHFRPHREVROHWH
RU H[KLELWV DQ LQKHUHQW GHILFLHQF\7KH SUHVHQW FRQGLWLRQ FRXOG FRQWULEXWHWR RU FDXVHWKH GHWHULRUDWLRQ RI FRQWLJXRXV HOHPHQWV RU V\VWHPV (LWKHU IXOO FRPSRQHQW UHSODFHPHQW LV QHHGHGRUUHSDLUVDUHUHTXLUHGWRUHVWRUHWRJRRGFRQGLWLRQSUHYHQWSUHPDWXUHIDLOXUHDQGRU SURORQJXVHIXOOLIH
)DLOHG &RPSRQHQW RU V\VWHP KDV FHDVHG IXQFWLRQLQJ RU SHUIRUPLQJ DV LQWHQGHG 5HSODFHPHQW UHSDLURURWKHUVLJQLILFDQWFRUUHFWLYHDFWLRQLVUHFRPPHQGHGRUUHTXLUHG 1RW$SSOLFDEOH $VVLJQLQJDFRQGLWLRQGRHVQRWDSSO\RUPDNHORJLFDOVHQVHPRVWFRPPRQO\GXHWRWKHLWHP LQTXHVWLRQQRWEHLQJSUHVHQW
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
6FRSH
7KHVWDQGDUGVFRSHRIWKH)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQWLQFOXGHVWKHIROORZLQJ
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
3URYLGHDIXOOGHVFULSWLRQRIWKH3URSHUW\ZLWKGHVFULSWLRQVRIH[LVWLQJV\VWHPVDQGFRPPHQWDU\RQREVHUYHGFRQGLWLRQV 3URYLGH D KLJKOHYHO FDWHJRULFDO JHQHUDO VWDWHPHQW UHJDUGLQJ WKH VXEMHFW 3URSHUW\¶V FRPSOLDQFH WR 7LWOH ,,, RI WKH $PHULFDQVZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW7KLVZLOOQRWFRQVWLWXWHDIXOO$'$VXUYH\EXWZLOOKHOSLGHQWLI\H[SRVXUHWRLVVXHVDQG WKHQHHGIRUIXUWKHUUHYLHZ
2EWDLQEDFNJURXQGDQGKLVWRULFDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKHIDFLOLW\IURPDEXLOGLQJHQJLQHHUSURSHUW\PDQDJHUPDLQWHQDQFH VWDIIRURWKHUNQRZOHGJHDEOHVRXUFH7KHSUHIHUUHGPHWKRGRORJ\LVWRKDYHWKHFOLHQWUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRUEXLOGLQJRFFXSDQW FRPSOHWHD3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
364
LQDGYDQFHRIWKHVLWHYLVLW&RPPRQDOWHUQDWLYHVLQFOXGHDYHUEDOLQWHUYLHZ MXVWSULRUWRRUGXULQJWKHZDONWKURXJKSRUWLRQRIWKHDVVHVVPHQW 5HYLHZPDLQWHQDQFHUHFRUGVDQGSURFHGXUHVZLWKWKHLQSODFHPDLQWHQDQFHSHUVRQQHO 2EVHUYHWKHH[WHULRUDPHQLWLHVRIWKHSURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJLQGLYLGXDOVLWHHOHPHQWV 3URYLGHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRUDGGLWLRQDOVWXGLHVLIUHTXLUHGZLWKUHODWHGEXGJHWDU\LQIRUPDWLRQ 3URYLGHDQ([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\DWWKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKLVUHSRUWZKLFKKLJKOLJKWVNH\IDFWVDERXWWKHSRUWIROLR &,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
) 2SLQLRQVRI3UREDEOH&RVWV
&RVWHVWLPDWHVDUHDWWDFKHGWKURXJKRXWWKLVUHSRUWZLWKWKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVLQWKHDSSHQGL[ 7KHVH HVWLPDWHV DUH EDVHG RQ,QYRLFH RU %LG 'RFXPHQWV SURYLGHG HLWKHU E\WKH 2ZQHUIDFLOLW\ DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ FRVWV GHYHORSHG E\ FRQVWUXFWLRQ UHVRXUFHV VXFK DV S eans C itestone DQG ars all Swift %XUHDX 9HULWDV¶V H[SHULHQFHZLWKSDVWFRVWVIRUVLPLODUSURSHUWLHVFLW\FRVWLQGH[HVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVUHJDUGLQJIXWXUHHFRQRPLFFRQGLWLRQV 2SLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWVVKRXOGRQO\EHFRQVWUXHGDVSUHOLPLQDU\RUGHURIPDJQLWXGHEXGJHWV$FWXDOFRVWVPRVWSUREDEO\ ZLOO YDU\IURPWKH FRQVXOWDQW¶V RSLQLRQVRI SUREDEOH FRVWVGHSHQGLQJ RQ VXFKPDWWHUVDVW\SH DQG GHVLJQ RI VXJJHVWHG UHPHG\ TXDOLW\ RI PDWHULDOV DQG LQVWDOODWLRQ PDQXIDFWXUHU DQG W\SH RI HTXLSPHQW RU V\VWHP VHOHFWHG ILHOG FRQGLWLRQV ZKHWKHUDSK\VLFDOGHILFLHQF\LVUHSDLUHGRUUHSODFHGLQZKROHSKDVLQJRUEXQGOLQJRIWKHZRUN LIDSSOLFDEOH
TXDOLW\RI
FRQWUDFWRUTXDOLW\RISURMHFWPDQDJHPHQWH[HUFLVHGPDUNHWFRQGLWLRQVXVHRIVXEFRQWUDFWRUVDQGZKHWKHUFRPSHWLWLYH SULFLQJLVVROLFLWHGHWF&HUWDLQRSLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWVFDQQRWEHGHYHORSHGZLWKLQWKHVFRSHRIWKLVJXLGHZLWKRXWIXUWKHU VWXG\2SLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWIRUIXUWKHUVWXG\VKRXOGEHLQFOXGHGLQWKH)&$ * 0HWKRGRORJ\
%DVHG XSRQ VLWH REVHUYDWLRQV UHVHDUFK DQG MXGJPHQW DORQJ ZLWK UHIHUHQFLQJ([SHFWHG 8VHIXO /LIH (8/
WDEOHVIURP
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
RIDFRPSRQHQW
RUV\VWHPHTXDOVWKH(8/OHVVLWVeffecti e ageZKHWKHUH[SOLFLWO\RULPSOLFLWO\VWDWHG3URMHFWLRQVRI5HPDLQLQJ8VHIXO/LIH
58/
DUHEDVHGSULPDULO\RQDJHDQGFRQGLWLRQZLWKWKHSUHVXPSWLRQRIFRQWLQXHGXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKH3URSHUW\ VLPLODUWRWKHREVHUYHGDQGUHSRUWHGSDVWXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHSUDFWLFHVLQFRQMXQFWLRQZLWKWKHSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWRI %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VDVVHVVRUV6LJQLILFDQWFKDQJHVLQRFFXSDQWVDQGRUXVDJHPD\DIIHFWWKHVHUYLFHOLIHRIVRPHV\VWHPVRU FRPSRQHQWV
:KHUHTXDQWLWLHVFRXOGQRWEHRUZHUHQRWGHULYHGIURPDQDFWXDOFRQVWUXFWLRQGRFXPHQWWDNHRIIRUIDFLOLW\ZDONWKURXJK DQGRUZKHUHV\VWHPLFFRVWVDUHPRUHDSSOLFDEOHRUSURYLGHPRUHLQWULQVLFYDOXHEXGJHWDU\VTXDUHIRRWDQGJURVVVTXDUH IRRWFRVWVDUHXVHG(VWLPDWHGFRVWVDUHEDVHGRQSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWDQGWKHSUREDEOHRUDFWXDOH[WHQWRIWKHREVHUYHG GHIHFWLQFOXVLYHRIWKHFRVWWRGHVLJQSURFXUHFRQVWUXFWDQGPDQDJHWKHFRUUHFWLRQV * 'HILQLWLRQV
,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
,PPHGLDWH 1HHGV DUH OLQH LWHPV WKDW UHTXLUH LPPHGLDWH DFWLRQ DV D UHVXOW RI
PDWHULDO H[LVWLQJ RU SRWHQWLDO XQVDIH
FRQGLWLRQV
IDLOHGRULPPLQHQWIDLOXUHRIPLVVLRQFULWLFDOEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVRU
FRQGLWLRQVWKDWLIQRW
DGGUHVVHGKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHVXOWLQRUFRQWULEXWHWRFULWLFDOHOHPHQWRUV\VWHPIDLOXUHZLWKLQRQH\HDURUZLOOPRVW SUREDEO\UHVXOWLQDVLJQLILFDQWHVFDODWLRQRILWVUHPHGLDOFRVW )RU GDWDEDVH DQG UHSRUWLQJ SXUSRVHV WKH OLQH LWHPV ZLWK 58/ DQG FRPPRQO\ DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK Safet RU Perfor ance ntegrit 3ODQ7\SHVDUHFRQVLGHUHG,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
&RVWOLQHLWHPVWUDGLWLRQDOO\FDOOHG5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV HTXLYDOHQWO\UHIHUUHGWRDV/LIHF\FOH5HQHZDOV
DUHIRUUHFXUULQJ
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
5HSODFHPHQW FRVWV DUH VROLFLWHG IURP RZQHUVKLSSURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW %XUHDX 9HULWDV¶V GLVFXVVLRQV ZLWK VHUYLFH FRPSDQLHVPDQXIDFWXUHUV
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDQGSUHYLRXVH[SHULHQFHLQSUHSDULQJVXFKVFKHGXOHVIRURWKHUVLPLODUIDFLOLWLHV &RVWVIRUZRUNSHUIRUPHGE\WKHRZQHUVKLS¶VRUSURSHUW\PDQDJHPHQW¶VPDLQWHQDQFHVWDIIDUHDOVRFRQVLGHUHG %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VUHVHUYHPHWKRGRORJ\LQYROYHVLGHQWLILFDWLRQDQGTXDQWLILFDWLRQRIWKRVHV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVUHTXLULQJ FDSLWDOUHVHUYHIXQGVZLWKLQWKHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRG7KHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRGLVGHILQHGDVWKHHIIHFWLYHDJHSOXVWKHUHVHUYH WHUP$GGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQFRQFHUQLQJV\VWHP¶VRUFRPSRQHQW¶VUHVSHFWLYHUHSODFHPHQWFRVWV LQWRGD\
VGROODUV
W\SLFDO
H[SHFWHG XVHIXO OLYHV DQG UHPDLQLQJ XVHIXO OLYHV ZHUH HVWLPDWHG VR WKDW D IXQGLQJ VFKHGXOH FRXOG EH SUHSDUHG 7KH 5HSODFHPHQW 5HVHUYHV 6FKHGXOH SUHVXSSRVHV WKDW DOO UHTXLUHG UHPHGLDO ZRUN KDV EHHQ SHUIRUPHG RU WKDW PRQLHV IRU UHPHGLDWLRQKDYHEHHQEXGJHWHGIRULWHPVGHILQHGDV,PPHGLDWH1HHGV )RUWKHSXUSRVHVRIµEXFNHWL]LQJ¶WKH6\VWHP([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVWVLQWKLVUHSRUWWKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVKDYHEHHQ VXEGLYLGHGDQGJURXSHGDVIROORZV
6KRUW7HUP
\HDUV
1HDU7HUP
\HDUV
0HGLXP7HUP
\HDUV
DQG/RQJ
7HUP
\HDUV
.H\)LQGLQJV
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
$IDLUO\ FRPPRQ VFHQDULR HQFRXQWHUHG GXULQJWKH DVVHVVPHQW SURFHVV DQG DIUHTXHQW VRXUFH RI GHEDWH RFFXUVZKHQ FODVVLI\LQJDQGGHVFULELQJ³YHU\ROG´V\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWDUHVWLOOIXQFWLRQLQJDGHTXDWHO\DQGGRQRWDSSHDUQRU ZHUHUHSRUWHGWREHLQDQ\ZD\GHILFLHQW7RKHOSSURYLGHVRPHDGGLWLRQDOLQWHOOLJHQFHRQWKHVHLWHPVVXFKFRPSRQHQWV ZLOOEHWDJJHGLQWKHGDWDEDVHDV([FHHGLQJO\$JHG7KLVGHVLJQDWLRQZLOOEHUHVHUYHGIRUPHFKDQLFDORUHOHFWULFDOV\VWHPV RUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWKDYHDJHGZHOOEH\RQGWKHLULQGXVWU\VWDQGDUGOLIHF\FOHVW\SLFDOO\DWOHDVW\HDUVEH\RQGDQGRUWZLFH WKHLU(VWLPDWHG8VHIXO/LIH
(8/
,QWDQGHPZLWKWKLVGHVLJQDWLRQWKHVHLWHPVZLOOEHDVVLJQHGD5HPDLQLQJ8VHIXO/LIH
58/
QRWOHVVWKDQWZR\HDUVEXWQRWJUHDWHUWKDQRIWKHLUVWDQGDUG(8/$VVXFKWKHUHFRPPHQGHGUHSODFHPHQWWLPH IRUWKHVHFRPSRQHQWVZLOOUHVLGHRXWVLGHWKHW\SLFDO6KRUW7HUPZLQGRZEXWZLOOQRWEHSXVKHGµLUUHVSRQVLEO\¶ WRRIDU
LQWR
WKHIXWXUH
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
* &HUWLILFDWLRQ
7K&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
WKH&OLHQW
UHWDLQHG%XUHDX9HULWDVWRSHUIRUPWKLV)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQWLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKLWV FRQWLQXHGRSHUDWLRQRI&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQWKH³3URSHUW\´,WLVRXUXQGHUVWDQGLQJWKDWWKHSULPDU\LQWHUHVW RIWKH&OLHQWLVWRORFDWHDQGHYDOXDWHPDWHULDOVDQGEXLOGLQJV\VWHPGHIHFWVWKDWPLJKWVLJQLILFDQWO\DIIHFWWKHYDOXHRIWKH SURSHUW\ DQG WR GHWHUPLQH LI WKH SUHVHQW 3URSHUW\ KDV FRQGLWLRQV WKDW ZLOO KDYH D VLJQLILFDQW LPSDFW RQ LWV FRQWLQXHG RSHUDWLRQV
7KLVUHSRUWKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGIRUDQGLVH[FOXVLYHO\IRUWKHXVHDQGEHQHILWRIWKH&OLHQWLGHQWLILHGRQWKHFRYHUSDJHRIWKLV UHSRUW7KHSXUSRVHIRUZKLFKWKLVUHSRUWVKDOOEHXVHGVKDOOEHOLPLWHGWRWKHXVHDVVWDWHGLQWKHFRQWUDFWEHWZHHQWKHFOLHQW DQG%XUHDX9HULWDV
7KLVUHSRUWRUDQ\RIWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGWKHUHLQLVQRWIRUWKHXVHRUEHQHILWRIQRUPD\LWEHUHOLHGXSRQE\DQ\ RWKHUSHUVRQRUHQWLW\IRUDQ\SXUSRVHZLWKRXWWKHDGYDQFHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI%XUHDX9HULWDV$Q\UHXVHRUGLVWULEXWLRQ ZLWKRXWVXFKFRQVHQWVKDOOEHDWWKHFOLHQW
VRUUHFLSLHQW
VVROHULVNZLWKRXWOLDELOLW\WR%XUHDX9HULWDV
7KHFRQFOXVLRQVDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVUHSRUWDUHEDVHGRQWKHEULHIUHYLHZRIWKHSODQVDQGUHFRUGVPDGH DYDLODEOH WR RXU 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU GXULQJ WKH VLWH YLVLW LQWHUYLHZV RI DYDLODEOH SURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHO DQG PDLQWHQDQFHFRQWUDFWRUVIDPLOLDUZLWKWKH3URSHUW\DSSURSULDWHLQTXLU\RIPXQLFLSDODXWKRULWLHVRXU3URMHFW0DQDJHU¶VZDON WKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVGXULQJWKHVLWHYLVLWDQGRXUH[SHULHQFHZLWKVLPLODUSURSHUWLHV 1RWHVWLQJH[SORUDWRU\SURELQJGLVPDQWOLQJRURSHUDWLQJRIHTXLSPHQWRULQGHSWKVWXGLHVZHUHSHUIRUPHGXQOHVVVSHFLILFDOO\ UHTXLUHGXQGHUWKHPurpose an ScopeVHFWLRQRIWKLVUHSRUW7KLVDVVHVVPHQWGLGQRWLQFOXGHHQJLQHHULQJFDOFXODWLRQVWR GHWHUPLQHWKHDGHTXDF\RIWKH3URSHUW\¶VRULJLQDOGHVLJQRUH[LVWLQJV\VWHPV$OWKRXJKZDONWKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVZHUH SHUIRUPHGQRWDOODUHDVPD\KDYHEHHQREVHUYHG
VHH6HFWLRQIRUVSHFLILFGHWDLOV
7KHUHPD\EHGHIHFWVLQWKH3URSHUW\
ZKLFKZHUHLQDUHDVQRWREVHUYHGRUUHDGLO\DFFHVVLEOHPD\QRWKDYHEHHQYLVLEOHRUZHUHQRWGLVFORVHGE\PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHOZKHQTXHVWLRQHG7KHUHSRUWGHVFULEHVSURSHUW\FRQGLWLRQVDWWKHWLPHWKDWWKHREVHUYDWLRQVDQGUHVHDUFKZHUH FRQGXFWHG
3UHSDUHGE\
$OYDUR%HGR\D
3URMHFW0DQDJHU
5HYLHZHGE\
0DU\9HQDEOH
3URJUDP0DQDJHU
0DU\YHQDEOH#EXUHDXYHULWDVFRP
[
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
+ $SSHQGLFHV
$SSHQGL[$
3KRWRJUDSKLF5HFRUG
$SSHQGL[%
6LWH3ODQ
$SSHQGL[&
3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
$SSHQGL['
$FFHVVLELOLW\5HYLHZDQG3KRWRV
$SSHQGL[(
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
$SSHQGL[)
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
$SSHQGL[*
2EVHUYDWLRQ*360DS/LQNV
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[$
3KRWRJUDSKLF5HFRUG
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP _S
29(59,(:)5207+,5'%$6( 29(59,(:)520%$6(
'8*287 %/($&+(56
)28/32/( %$&.6723&+$,1/,1.)(1&(
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP _S
)(1&($1'6&25(%2$5' /,*+7,1*
$1&,//$5<%8,/',1* /,*+7,1*$1')/$*32/(
3$5.,1*/27 %$&.)/2:35(9(17(5
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[%
6LWH3ODQ
6LWH3ODQ
3URMHFW1XPEHU 3URMHFW1DPH
5 &LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ
6RXUFH 2Q6LWH'DWH
*RRJOH(DUWK3UR 1RYHPEHU
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[&
3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
%XLOGLQJ)DFLOLW\1DPH
&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ
1DPHRISHUVRQFRPSOHWLQJIRUP
7LWOH$VVRFLDWLRQZSURSHUW\
/HQJWKRIWLPHDVVRFLDWHGZSURSHUW\
'DWH&RPSOHWHG
3KRQH1XPEHU
%9)$&,/,7<&21',7,21$66(660(17
35(6859(<48(67,211$,5(
0HWKRGRI&RPSOHWLRQ
,1&203/(7(FOLHQW32&XQZLOOLQJRUXQDEOHWRFRPSOHWH 7KH3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUHZDVQRWILOOHGRXWHLWKHUSULRUWRRUGXULQJWKHDVVHVVPHQW Signature of Assessor Signature of POC
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL['
$FFHVVLELOLW\5HYLHZDQG3KRWRV
9LVXDO6XUYH\$'$6WDQGDUGVIRU$FFHVVLEOH'HVLJQ 0DMRU,VVXHV
$'$VWXG\
UHFRPPHQGHG
0RGHUDWH,VVXHV
$'$VWXG\
UHFRPPHQGHG
&DWHJRU\ 0LQRU,VVXHV
&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ
$FFHVVLELOLW\,VVXHV
3DUNLQJ
([WHULRU$FFHVVLEOH5RXWH
%XLOGLQJ(QWUDQFHV
,QWHULRU$FFHVVLEOH5RXWH
(OHYDWRUV
3XEOLF5HVWURRPV
.LWFKHQV.LWFKHQHWWHV
3OD\JURXQGV 6ZLPPLQJ
3RROV
2WKHU
1RQH
*be cognizant that if the “None” box is checked that does not guarantee full compliance; this study is limited in nature )DFLOLW\+LVWRU\ ,QWHUYLHZ
4XHVWLRQ <HV 1R 8QN &RPPHQWV
+DVDQDFFHVVLELOLW\VWXG\EHHQSUHYLRXVO\
SHUIRUPHG",IVRZKHQ"
+DYHDQ\$'$LPSURYHPHQWVEHHQPDGHWR
WKHSURSHUW\VLQFHRULJLQDOFRQVWUXFWLRQ"
'HVFULEH
+DVEXLOGLQJPDQDJHPHQWUHSRUWHGDQ\
DFFHVVLELOLW\EDVHGFRPSODLQWVRUOLWLJDWLRQ"
3URSHUW\1DPH
%93URMHFW1XPEHU
&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ
5
&LW\%DVHEDOO)LHOGDW0DQRRVKLDQ
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
29(59,(:2)$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1*$5($ &/26(832)67$//
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[(
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[)
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
&,7<%$6(%$//),(/'$70$1226+,$1 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
$SSHQGL[*
2EVHUYDWLRQ*360DS/LQNV
Component Description Attributes Action Description Location Description Condition Latitude Longitude GPS Map Link Plan Type Helper Label Effective Age Lifespan RUL Fiscal Year Observed Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Barcode Comments Public Park Name AssetCALC ID Bleachers Fixed Steel Frame, Aluminum Benches (per Seat) Replace Site Fair 34.148844 Ͳ117.848518 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148844,Ͳ117.848518 Lifecycle/Renewal Bleachers, Fixed Steel Frame, Aluminum Benches (per Seat), Replace 14 25 11 300 129.96 38988 002424 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049642 Fences & Gates Fence, Chain Link 4' Replace Site Fair 34.148273 Ͳ117.848331 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148273,Ͳ117.848331 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Chain Link 4', Replace 30 40 10 360 19.494 7017.84 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049641Sports Apparatus Baseball, Foul Pole Replace Site Fair 34.148309 Ͳ117.848351 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148309,Ͳ117.848351 Lifecycle/Renewal Sports Apparatus, Baseball, Foul Pole, Replace 15 25 10 2 1624.5 3249 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049634 Parking Lots Pavement, Asphalt Mill & Overlay Site Poor 34.148469 Ͳ117.847618 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148469,Ͳ117.847618 Performance/Integrity Parking Lots, Pavement, Asphalt, Mill & Overlay 23 25 2 49000 3.7905 185734.5 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049626Backflow Preventer Domestic Water Replace Site Fair 34.148877 Ͳ117.847914 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148877,Ͳ117.847914 Lifecycle/Renewal Backflow Preventer, Domestic Water, 2 IN, Replace 24 30 6 1 3465.6 3465.6 002423 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049629 Site Light Pole 20' Height, w/o Base or Fixtures Replace/Install Site Fair 34.148908 Ͳ117.848185 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148908,Ͳ117.848185 Lifecycle/Renewal Site Light Pole, 20' Height, w/o Base or Fixtures, Replace/Install 25 40 15 6 2490.9 14945.4 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049630 Ancillary Building CMU, Basic/Minimal Replace Building Exterior Fair 34.148874 Ͳ117.848491 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148874,Ͳ117.848491 Lifecycle/Renewal Ancillary Building, CMU, Basic/Minimal, Replace 18 35 17 500 64.98 32490 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049635 Fences & Gates Fence, Chain Link 6' Replace Site Fair 34.148446 Ͳ117.848414 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148446,Ͳ117.848414 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Chain Link 6', Replace 25 40 15 260 22.743 5913.18 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049625 Sports Apparatus Player/Dugout Benches, 12' Length Replace Site Fair 34.148585 Ͳ117.848395 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148585,Ͳ117.848395 Lifecycle/Renewal Sports Apparatus, Player/Dugout Benches, 12' Length, Replace 9 15 6 2 974.7 1949.4 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049638 Bleachers Fixed Steel Frame, Aluminum Benches (per Seat) Replace Site Fair 34.148939 Ͳ117.848211 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148939,Ͳ117.848211 Lifecycle/Renewal Bleachers, Fixed Steel Frame, Aluminum Benches (per Seat), Replace 14 25 11 250 129.96 32490 002425 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049632 Exterior Fixture w/ Lamp any type, w/ LED Replacement Replace Building Exterior Fair 34.148973 Ͳ117.848414 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148973,Ͳ117.848414 Lifecycle/Renewal Light FixtureͲExterior Building 12 20 8 3 649.8 1949.4 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049628 Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement Replace/Install Site Fair 34.148504 Ͳ117.847978 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148504,Ͳ117.847978 Lifecycle/Renewal Pole Light Fixture w/ Lamps, any type 30' High, w/ LED Replacement, 400 W, Replace/Install 12 20 8 1 7364.4 7364.4 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049637Sports Apparatus Baseball, Backstop ChainͲLink Replace Site Fair 34.148801033090116 Ͳ117.84834875743675 https://www.google.com/maps?q=34.148801033090116,Ͳ117.84834875743675 Lifecycle/Renewal Sports Apparatus, Baseball, Backstop ChainͲLink, Replace 12 20 8 1 5415 5415 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7140084Sports Apparatus Baseball/Football, Protective Netting Replace Site Fair 34.148625 Ͳ117.848340 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148625,Ͳ117.848340 Lifecycle/Renewal Sports Apparatus, Baseball/Football, Protective Netting, Replace 9 15 6 2400 4.332 10396.8 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049631 Outdoor Spectator Seating Bleachers, Aluminum Benches (per Seat) Replace Site Fair 34.148752 Ͳ117.847744 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148752,Ͳ117.847744 Lifecycle/Renewal Bleachers, Aluminum Benches (per Seat), Replace 21 25 4 180 129.96 23392.8 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049627 Bike Rack Portable 6Ͳ10 Bikes Replace Site Fair 34.148771 Ͳ117.847658 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148771,Ͳ117.847658 Lifecycle/Renewal Bike Rack, Portable 6Ͳ10 Bikes, Replace 12 15 3 1 541.5 541.5 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049636Parking Lots Pavement, Asphalt Seal & Stripe Site Poor 34.148469 Ͳ117.847618 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148469,Ͳ117.847618 Performance/Integrity Parking Lots, Pavement, Asphalt, Mill & Overlay 5 5 0 49000 0.48735 23880.15 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7189604Flagpole Metal Replace Site Fair 34.148482 Ͳ117.847927 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148482,Ͳ117.847927 Lifecycle/Renewal Flagpole, Metal, Replace 19 30 11 1 2707.5 2707.5 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049633 Roofing Metal Replace Roof Fair 34.148780 Ͳ117.848719 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148780,Ͳ117.848719 Lifecycle/Renewal Metal Roof 23 40 17 500 14.079 7039.5 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049640 Exterior Door Steel, Standard Replace Building Exterior Fair 34.148917 Ͳ117.848430 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148917,Ͳ117.848430 Lifecycle/Renewal Exterior Door Steel 23 40 17 2 649.8 1299.6 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049643 Sports Apparatus Scoreboard, Electronic Standard Replace Site Fair 34.148373 Ͳ117.848061 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.148373,Ͳ117.848061 Lifecycle/Renewal Sports Apparatus, Scoreboard, Electronic Standard, Replace 15 25 10 1 8664 8664 City Baseball Field at Manooshian 7049639 1 of 1
*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLO
6XQIORZHUDQG*ODGVWRQH6WUHHW
*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
)$&,/,7<&21',7,21$66(660(17
35(3$5('%<
ureau eritas
Uni ersit oule ar Suite
llicott Cit ar lan
www us bureau eritas co
%9&217$&7
ar enable C A
Progra anager
ar enable bureau eritas co
%9352-(&7
'$7(2)5(3257
ece ber
216,7('$7(
No e ber
Bureau Veritas
8QLYHUVLW\%RXOHYDUG6XLWH_(OOLFRWW&LW\0DU\ODQG_ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S */(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
7$%/(2)&217(176
$ 8UEDQ7UDLO([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\ $ 8UEDQ7UDLO2YHUYLHZDQG$VVHVVPHQW'HWDLOV $ 8UEDQ7UDLO)LQGLQJVDQG'HILFLHQFLHV % $PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH % 3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWKRGRORJ\ % 7UDLO3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWULFV % 3ODQ7\SHV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% ,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% .H\)LQGLQJV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% 8UEDQ7UDLO & 3URSHUW\6SDFH8VHDQG2EVHUYHG$UHDV
' $'$$FFHVVLELOLW\ ( 3XUSRVHDQG6FRSH ) 2SLQLRQVRI3UREDEOH&RVWV )0HWKRGRORJ\ )'HILQLWLRQV * &HUWLILFDWLRQ + $SSHQGLFHV */(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$ 8UEDQ7UDLO([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\
$ 8UEDQ7UDLO2YHUYLHZDQG$VVHVVPHQW'HWDLOV
*HQHUDO,QIRUPDWLRQ
3DUN7\SH 8UEDQ7UDLO6\VWHP
1XPEHURI%XLOGLQJV 1RQH
0DLQ$GGUHVV 6XQIORZHUDQG*ODGVWRQH6WUHHW*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
6LWH'HYHORSHG
6LWH$UHD DFUHV
HVWLPDWHG
2XWVLGH2FFXSDQWV/HDVHG6SDFHV 1RQH
'DWH
V
RI9LVLW 1RYHPEHU
0DQDJHPHQW3RLQWRI&RQWDFW 0LFKDHO6OHGG$VVLVWDQW3XEOLF:RUNV'LUHFWRU &LW\RI*OHQGRUD
PVOHGG#FLW\RIJOHQGRUDRUJ
2QVLWH3RLQWRI&RQWDFW
32&
8QHVFRUWHG
$VVHVVPHQWDQG5HSRUW3UHSDUHG%\ $OYDUR%HGR\D
5HYLHZHG%\ 0DU\9HQDEOH&(05$
3URJUDP0DQDJHU
0DU\9HQDEOH#EXUHDXYHULWDVFRP
[
$VVHW&DOF/LQN )XOOGDWDVHWIRUWKLVDVVHVVPHQWFDQEHIRXQGDW
KWWSV
ZZZDVVHWFDOFQHW
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$ 8UEDQ7UDLO)LQGLQJVDQG'HILFLHQFLHV
+LVWRULFDO6XPPDU\
7KHLQDXJXUDWLRQRIWKH*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLOVSDQQLQJRQHPLOHWRRNSODFHRQ-XQH7KLVWUDLOUHSUHVHQWVWKH LQLWLDOSKDVHRIDODUJHUXUEDQWUDLOV\VWHPWRWDOLQJPLOHVSURMHFWHGWRH[WHQGIURP/RXLH3RPSHL0HPRULDO6SRUWV3DUN WR*UDQG$YHQXH7KHWUDLOLVGHVLJQHGZLWKWKHFRPPXQLW\LQPLQGSURYLGLQJDVSDFHIRUUHVLGHQWVWRZDONRUULGHWKHLU ELF\FOHVIUHHO\DZD\IURPWKHFRQILQHVRIWKHVWUHHW *HQHUDO6LWH
7KHSDWKHQFRPSDVVHVDIRRWZLGHDVSKDOWWUDLOZLWKDGHVLJQDWHGWZRZD\ODQH5XQQLQJDORQJWKHQRUWKHUQHGJHLVWKH 6DQ 'LPDV :DVK FDQDO ZKLOH WKH VRXWKHUQ ERUGHU FRQQHFWV WR WKH EDFN\DUGV RI WKH QHLJKERUKRRG UHVLGHQFHV DOO VDIHJXDUGHGE\DFKDLQOLQNIHQFHRQERWKVLGHV7KHWUDLOLVHTXLSSHGZLWKWKUHHLURQJDWHV RQHDWWKHWUDLOKHDGDQGWZR
IODQNLQJHDFKVLGHRIWKH/RXL3RPSHL3DUNSDUNLQJDUHD$GMDFHQWWRWKHZHVWHUQSDUNHQWUDQFH\RX OOILQGWZRFRQFUHWH
SLFQLFWDEOHVDQGDFURVVWKHVWUHHWIURPWKHWUDLO
VZHVWHQWUDQFHRQDWULDQJXODUSORWWKUHHFRQFUHWHEHQFKHVDUHSRVLWLRQHG 1RWDEO\WKHWUDLOLVHQKDQFHGE\ILYHPRQXPHQWVLJQV $UFKLWHFWXUDO
7KH*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLOFRQWDLQQRVWUXFWXUHVRUVLJQLILFDQWEXLOWDVVHWV 0HFKDQLFDO(OHFWULFDO3OXPELQJDQG)LUH
0(3)
7KH *OHQGRUD 8UEDQ 7UDLO ODFNV 0(3)
0HFKDQLFDO (OHFWULFDO 3OXPELQJ DQG )LUH 3URWHFWLRQ HOHPHQWV RU VLJQLILFDQW
PHFKDQLFDODVVHWVH[FHSWIRUDPLQRULUULJDWLRQWULDQJOHORFDWHGRQWKHRSSRVLWHVLGHIURPWKHWUDLO VVWDUWLQJSRLQW,W
VZRUWK
KLJKOLJKWLQJWKDWQROLJKWLQJRUGULQNLQJIRXQWDLQVZHUHLGHQWLILHGDORQJWKHWUDLOZKLFKFRXOGEHFRQVLGHUHGDGYDQWDJHRXVLI DGGHG
5HFRPPHQGHG$GGLWLRQDO6WXGLHV
1RDGGLWLRQDOVWXGLHVUHFRPPHQGHGDWWKLVWLPH
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% $PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
% 3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWKRGRORJ\
8UEDQ7UDLO&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
DQG$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
$ PDMRU JRDO RI WKH )DFLOLW\ &RQGLWLRQ $VVHVVPHQW )&$
LV WR EHQFKPDUN LQGLYLGXDO SDUNV ZLWK RWKHU SDUNV ZLWKLQ WKH SRUWIROLRDQGDPHQLWLHVZLWKRWKHUDPHQLWLHVHLWKHUZLWKLQWKHVDPHSDUNDQGDFURVVWKHSRUWIROLR7RDFKLHYHDUDWLQJIRU HDFKSDUNWKH3DUN&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
LVGHYHORSHG
VLPLODUO\DQ$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
LVXVHGWRFRPSDUH
DPHQLWLHV
7RDVVLVWLQWKHRYHUDOOSULRULWL]DWLRQHIIRUWWKHIROORZLQJWHUPVDUHXVHGDWWKH&RPSRQHQWDQG$PHQLW\OHYHO
&RPSRQHQW
LQGLYLGXDOHOHPHQWVRIWKHDPHQLW\RUSDUNWKDWDUHHYDOXDWHGDQGDVVLJQHGFRQGLWLRQVDQG*36FRRUGLQDWHV ([DPSOHVRIFRPSRQHQWVLQFOXGHEHQFKHVWUDVKUHFHSWDFOHVWHQQLVQHWVSOD\JURXQGVXUIDFHVRUVSOLWUDLOIHQFLQJ $PHQLW\
GHILQHGDVDJURXSRIFRPSRQHQWVWKDWFRQVWLWXWHDPDMRUIHDWXUHRIWKHSDUNORJLFDOO\JURXSHGWRJHWKHUE\ SXUSRVHDQGRUSUR[LPLW\([DPSOHVRIDQDPHQLW\LQFOXGHDEDVNHWEDOOFRXUWDVRIWEDOOILHOGDGRJSDUNSLFQLFDUHDRU SOD\JURXQG
&XUUHQW5HQHZDO9DOXH
&59
WKHFRVWLQWRGD\¶VGROODUVRIWKHPDMRUFRQVWLWXHQWSDUWVWKDWPDNHXSWKHZKROH
IRU3DUNV
&59 UHQHZDOFRVWRIDOOGHYHORSHGDPHQLWLHVZLWKLQLW ODQGYDOXHLVH[FOXGHG
IRU$PHQLWLHV
&59 UHQHZDOFRVWRIDOOVLJQLILFDQWFRPSRQHQWVZLWKLQLW */(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
7KH$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
LVDVFRUHFDOFXODWHGIURPDQDOJRULWKPFRPSULVLQJDZHLJKWHGDYHUDJHRIWKHFRQGLWLRQV RIDOOWKHFRPSRQHQWVZLWKLQLW
$0(1,7< &21',7,21 6&25(
$&6
)2508/$ 680 >5HPDLQLQJ 9DOXH5HQHZDO 9DOXH
5HQ9
RI FRPELQHG
FRPSRQHQWV@
5HPDLQLQJYDOXH 5HQ9PXOWLSOLHGE\58/(8/
7KH3DUN&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
LVWKHWRWDOVFRUHIRUDVLQJOHSDUNSURSHUW\FDOFXODWHGIURPWKHVXPRIWKH$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ 6FRUHV
$&6V
IRUHDFKDPHQLW\ZLWKLQWKHSDUN
3$5.&21',7,216&25()2508/$ 680>5HPDLQLQJ9DOXH@680>5HQHZDO9DOXH@
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% 7UDLO 3ULRULWL]DWLRQ0HWULFV
7UDLO &RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
DQG$PHQLW\ &RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
$ PDMRU JRDO RI WKH )DFLOLW\ &RQGLWLRQ $VVHVVPHQW )&$
LV WR EHQFKPDUN LQGLYLGXDO SDUNV ZLWK RWKHU SDUNV ZLWKLQ WKH SRUWIROLRDQGDPHQLWLHVZLWKRWKHUDPHQLWLHVHLWKHUZLWKLQWKHVDPHSDUNDQGDFURVVWKHSRUWIROLR7RDFKLHYHDUDWLQJIRU HDFKSDUNWKH3DUN&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
3&6
LVGHYHORSHG
VLPLODUO\DQ$PHQLW\&RQGLWLRQ6FRUH
$&6
LVXVHGWRFRPSDUH
DPHQLWLHV
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
% 3ODQ7\SHV
$PHQLWLHVDQG *HQHUDO6LWH
(DFKOLQHLWHPLQWKHFRVWGDWDEDVHLVDVVLJQHGD3ODQ7\SHZKLFKLVWKHSULPDU\UHDVRQIRUWKHUHFRPPHQGHGUHSODFHPHQW UHSDLURURWKHUFRUUHFWLYHDFWLRQ$FRVWRUOLQHLWHPPD\FRPPRQO\KDYHPRUHWKDQRQHDSSOLFDEOH3ODQ7\SH KRZHYHU
RQO\RQH3ODQ7\SHZLOOEHDVVLJQHGEDVHGRQWKHEHVWILWW\SLFDOO\WKHRQHZLWKWKHJUHDWHVWVLJQLILFDQFH 6HHWKHPurpose GHVFULSWLRQLQWKHPurpose an Scope VHFWLRQIRUDQH[SODQDWLRQRI&RPSRQHQW7\SH 3ODQ7\SH'HVFULSWLRQV
6DIHW\ $QREVHUYHGRU UHSRUWHGXQVDIHFRQGLWLRQWKDWLIOHIWXQDGGUHVVHGFRXOG UHVXOWLQ LQMXU\
DV\VWHPRUFRPSRQHQWWKDWSUHVHQWVSRWHQWLDOOLDELOLW\ULVN 3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\ &RPSRQHQWRU V\VWHPKDVIDLOHGLVDOPRVWIDLOLQJSHUIRUPVXQUHOLDEO\GRHVQRW SHUIRUPDVLQWHQGHGDQGRUSRVHVULVNWRRYHUDOOV\VWHPVWDELOLW\ $FFHVVLELOLW\ 'RHVQRWPHHW$'$8)$6DQGRURWKHUDFFHVVLELOLW\UHTXLUHPHQWV (QYLURQPHQWDO ,PSURYHPHQWVWRDLUZDWHURUVRLO TXDOLW\LQFOXGLQJUHPRYDORIKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOV IURPWKHVLWH
5HWURILW$GDSWDWLRQ &RPSRQHQWVV\VWHPVRUVSDFHVUHFRPPHQGHGIRUXSJUDGHVLQLQRUGHUWR PHHW FXUUHQWVWDQGDUGVIDFLOLW\XVDJHRUFOLHQWRFFXSDQWQHHGV */(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
3ODQ7\SH'HVFULSWLRQV
/LIHF\FOH5HQHZDO $Q\FRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPWKDWLVQRWFXUUHQWO\GHILFLHQWRUSUREOHPDWLFEXWIRU ZKLFKIXWXUHUHSODFHPHQWRUUHSDLULVDQWLFLSDWHGDQGEXGJHWHG 3ODQ7\SH'LVWULEXWLRQ
E\&RVW
±7LPHIUDPH<HDUV
% ,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
,PPHGLDWH 1HHGV DUH OLQH LWHPV WKDW UHTXLUH LPPHGLDWH DFWLRQ DV D UHVXOW RI
PDWHULDO H[LVWLQJ RU SRWHQWLDO XQVDIH
FRQGLWLRQV
IDLOHGRULPPLQHQWIDLOXUHRIPLVVLRQFULWLFDOEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVRU
FRQGLWLRQVWKDWLIQRW
DGGUHVVHGKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHVXOWLQRUFRQWULEXWHWRFULWLFDOHOHPHQWRUV\VWHPIDLOXUHZLWKLQRQH\HDURUZLOOPRVW SUREDEO\UHVXOWLQDVLJQLILFDQWHVFDODWLRQRILWVUHPHGLDOFRVW )RU GDWDEDVH DQG UHSRUWLQJ SXUSRVHV WKH OLQH LWHPV ZLWK 58/ DQG FRPPRQO\ DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK Safet RU Perfor ance ntegrit 3ODQ7\SHVDUHFRQVLGHUHG,PPHGLDWH1HHGV %9GLGQRWLGHQWLI\DQ\LPPHGLDWHQHHGVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHDPHQLWLHVRUJHQHUDOSDUNDUHDVDWWKLVVLWH
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% .H\)LQGLQJV
$PHQLWLHVDQG*HQHUDO6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJVW\SLFDOO\LQFOXGHUHSDLUVRUUHSODFHPHQWVRIGHILFLHQWLWHPVZLWKLQWKHILUVWILYH\HDUZLQGRZDVZHOODVWKHPRVW VLJQLILFDQW KLJKGROODU OLQH LWHPV WKDW IDOO DQ\ZKHUH ZLWKLQ WKH WHQ\HDU WHUP 1RWH WKDW ZKLOH WKHUH LV VRPH VXEMHFWLYLW\ DVVRFLDWHGZLWKLGHQWLI\LQJWKH.H\)LQGLQJVWKH,PPHGLDWH1HHGVDUHDOZD\VLQFOXGHGDVDVXEVHW 7KHQXPHULFDOVFRULQJRIFRQGLWLRQDVVKRZQLQWKH.H\)LQGLQJVLVEDVHGRQDVFDOHDVLOOXVWUDWHGEHORZ
5HSODFHPHQWKDVQRQHRUYHU\ORZLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQV ±5HSODFHPHQWKDVORZLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQV
5HSODFHPHQWKDVPHGLXPLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQ )DLOLQJVDIHW\RUFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWFRPSRQHQWZLWKKLJKLPSDFWRQSDUNRSHUDWLRQV 6LJQDJHLQ3RRU&RQGLWLRQ
6LJQDJH*XLGHDQG'LUHFWLRQDO
*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLO6LWH
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFH,QVWDOOLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
&RUQHU%URNHQDQG*UDIILWL$VVHW&$/&,'
6LJQDJHLQ3RRU&RQGLWLRQ
6LJQDJH*XLGHDQG'LUHFWLRQDO
*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLO6LWH
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFH,QVWDOOLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
:LWK*UDIILWL$VVHW&$/&,'
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
% 8UEDQ7UDLO
*HQHUDO,QIRUPDWLRQ
$VVHW7\SH 7UDLO
$VVHW/RFDWLRQ %HWZHHQ6RXWK 6XQIORZHU$YHQXH DQG/RXLH3RPSHL0HPRULDO6SRUW3DUN 2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
Co ponent escription uantit Con ition
/DQGVFDSLQJDQG
7RSRJUDSK\
/LPLWHGODQGVFDSLQJIHDWXUHV
LUULJDWLRQSUHVHQW
/RZWRPRGHUDWHVLWHVORSHVWKURXJKRXW
6WRUP:DWHU
0DQDJHPHQW 6XUIDFHGUDLQDJHWRGHYHORSHGDQGXQGHYHORSHGVXUURXQGLQJV $FFHVVLELOLW\ 3RWHQWLDODFFHVVLELOLW\LVVXHVZHUHQRWREVHUYHGDWWKLVDVVHW 5HIHUWR$SSHQGL['DQGWKHSUHYLRXVVWXG\IRUPRUHGHWDLOV .H\,VVXHVDQG
)LQGLQJV 1RQH
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
& 3URSHUW\6SDFH8VHDQG2EVHUYHG$UHDV
$UHDV2EVHUYHG
$OO DUHDV RI WKH WUDLO ZHUH REVHUYHG LQ RUGHU WR JDLQ D FOHDU XQGHUVWDQGLQJ RI WKH SURSHUW\¶V RYHUDOO FRQGLWLRQ
.H\6SDFHV1RW2EVHUYHG
7KHUHZHUHQRLQDFFHVVLEOHDUHDV
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
' $'$$FFHVVLELOLW\
*HQHUDOO\7LWOH,,RIWKH$PHULFDQVZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW $'$
SURKLELWVGLVFULPLQDWLRQE\HQWLWLHVWRDFFHVVDQGXVHRI³DUHDV RISXEOLFDFFRPPRGDWLRQV´DQG³SXEOLFIDFLOLWLHV´RQWKHEDVLVRIGLVDELOLW\5HJDUGOHVVRIWKHLUDJHWKHVHDUHDVDQGIDFLOLWLHV PXVWEHPDLQWDLQHGDQGRSHUDWHGWRFRPSO\ZLWKWKH$PHULFDQVZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW$FFHVVLELOLW\*XLGHOLQHV $'$$*
$SXEOLFHQWLW\
LHFLW\JRYHUQPHQWV
VKDOORSHUDWHHDFKVHUYLFHSURJUDPRUDFWLYLW\VRWKDWWKHVHUYLFHSURJUDPRUDFWLYLW\ ZKHQYLHZHGLQLWVHQWLUHW\LVUHDGLO\DFFHVVLEOHWRDQGXVDEOHE\LQGLYLGXDOVZLWKGLVDELOLWLHV +RZHYHUWKLVGRHVQRW
1HFHVVDULO\UHTXLUHDSXEOLFHQWLW\WRPDNHHDFKRILWVH[LVWLQJIDFLOLWLHVDFFHVVLEOHWRDQGXVDEOHE\LQGLYLGXDOVZLWK
GLVDELOLWLHV
5HTXLUHDSXEOLFHQWLW\WRWDNHDQ\DFWLRQWKDWZRXOGWKUHDWHQRUGHVWUR\WKHKLVWRULFVLJQLILFDQFHRIDQKLVWRULFSURSHUW\
RU
5HTXLUHDSXEOLFHQWLW\WRWDNHDQ\DFWLRQWKDWLWFDQGHPRQVWUDWHZRXOGUHVXOWLQDIXQGDPHQWDODOWHUDWLRQLQWKHQDWXUH RI D VHUYLFH SURJUDP RU DFWLYLW\ RU LQ XQGXH ILQDQFLDO DQG DGPLQLVWUDWLYH EXUGHQV ,Q WKRVH FLUFXPVWDQFHV ZKHUH SHUVRQQHORIWKHSXEOLFHQWLW\EHOLHYHWKDWWKHSURSRVHGDFWLRQZRXOGIXQGDPHQWDOO\DOWHUWKHVHUYLFHSURJUDPRUDFWLYLW\ RUZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQGXHILQDQFLDODQGDGPLQLVWUDWLYHEXUGHQVDSXEOLFHQWLW\KDVWKHEXUGHQRISURYLQJWKDWFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK
D
RIWKLVSDUWZRXOGUHVXOWLQVXFKDOWHUDWLRQRUEXUGHQV7KHGHFLVLRQWKDWFRPSOLDQFHZRXOGUHVXOWLQVXFK DOWHUDWLRQRUEXUGHQVPXVWEHPDGHE\WKHKHDGRIDSXEOLFHQWLW\RUKLVRUKHUGHVLJQHHDIWHUFRQVLGHULQJDOOUHVRXUFHV DYDLODEOHIRUXVHLQWKHIXQGLQJDQGRSHUDWLRQRIWKHVHUYLFHSURJUDPRUDFWLYLW\DQGPXVWEHDFFRPSDQLHGE\DZULWWHQ VWDWHPHQWRIWKHUHDVRQVIRUUHDFKLQJWKDWFRQFOXVLRQ,IDQDFWLRQZRXOGUHVXOWLQVXFKDQDOWHUDWLRQRUVXFKEXUGHQV D SXEOLF HQWLW\ VKDOO WDNH DQ\ RWKHU DFWLRQ WKDW ZRXOG QRW UHVXOW LQ VXFK DQ DOWHUDWLRQ RU VXFK EXUGHQV EXW ZRXOG QHYHUWKHOHVVHQVXUHWKDWLQGLYLGXDOVZLWKGLVDELOLWLHVUHFHLYHWKHEHQHILWVRUVHUYLFHVSURYLGHGE\WKHSXEOLFHQWLW\ 5HPRYDORIEDUULHUVWRDFFHVVLELOLW\VKRXOGEHDGGUHVVHGIURPDOLDELOLW\VWDQGSRLQWLQRUGHUWRFRPSO\ZLWKIHGHUDOODZEXW WKHEDUULHUVPD\RUPD\QRWEHEXLOGLQJFRGHYLRODWLRQV7KH$PHULFDQVZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW$FFHVVLELOLW\*XLGHOLQHVDUH SDUWRIWKH$'$IHGHUDOFLYLOULJKWVODZSHUWDLQLQJWRWKHGLVDEOHGDQGDUHQRWDFRQVWUXFWLRQFRGH6WDWHDQGORFDOMXULVGLFWLRQV KDYHDGRSWHGWKH$'$*XLGHOLQHVRUKDYHDGRSWHGRWKHUVWDQGDUGVIRUDFFHVVLELOLW\DVSDUWRIWKHLUFRQVWUXFWLRQFRGHV 'XULQJWKH)&$%XUHDX9HULWDVSHUIRUPHGDOLPLWHGKLJKOHYHODFFHVVLELOLW\UHYLHZRIWKHIDFLOLW\QRQVSHFLILFWRDQ\ORFDO UHJXODWLRQVRUFRGHV7KHVFRSHRIWKHYLVXDOREVHUYDWLRQZDVOLPLWHGWRWKHVDPHDUHDVREVHUYHGZKLOHSHUIRUPLQJWKH )&$DQGWKHFDWHJRULHVVHWIRUWKLQWKHPDWUL[WKDWDUHLQFOXGHGLQWKH$FFHVVLELOLW\DSSHQGL[,WLVXQGHUVWRRGE\WKH&OLHQW WKDWWKHOLPLWHGREVHUYDWLRQVGHVFULEHGKHUHLQGRQRWFRPSULVHDIXOO$'$&RPSOLDQFH6XUYH\DQGWKDWVXFKDVXUYH\LV EH\RQGWKHVFRSHRIWKLVSDUWLFXODUDVVHVVPHQW$IXOOPHDVXUHG$'$VXUYH\ZRXOGEH UHTXLUHGWRLGHQWLI\DQ\DQGDOO VSHFLILFSRWHQWLDODFFHVVLELOLW\LVVXHV$GGLWLRQDOFODULILFDWLRQVRIWKLVOLPLWHGVXUYH\
7KLVVXUYH\ZDVYLVXDOLQQDWXUHDQGDFWXDOPHDVXUHPHQWVZHUHQRWWDNHQWRYHULI\FRPSOLDQFH 2QO\DUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDPSOHRIDUHDVZDVREVHUYHG
7ZRRYHUYLHZSKRWRVZHUHWDNHQIRUHDFKVXEVHFWLRQUHJDUGOHVVRISHUFHLYHGFRPSOLDQFHRUQRQFRPSOLDQFH ,WHPL]HGFRVWVIRULQGLYLGXDOQRQFRPSOLDQWLWHPVDUHLQFOXGHGLQWKHGDWDVHW )RUDQ\³QRQH´ER[HVFKHFNHGRUUHIHUHQFHWR³QRLVVXHV´LGHQWLILHGWKDWDORQHGRHVQRWJXDUDQWHHIXOOFRPSOLDQFH 7KHSDUNZDVRULJLQDOO\FRQVWUXFWHGLQ7KHWUDLOKDVQRWVLQFHEHHQVXEVWDQWLDOO\UHQRYDWHG 1R GHWDLOHG IROORZXS DFFHVVLELOLW\ VWXG\ LV FXUUHQWO\ UHFRPPHQGHG VLQFH QR FRPSOHWH DSDUWPHQW XQLW FRQYHUVLRQV DUH QHHGHGDQGWKHEXGJHWDU\VXPRIWKHFRUUHFWLYHFRVWVLGHQWLILHGDWWKHVXEMHFWVLWHLVOHVVWKDQ5HIHUHQFHWKH DSSHQGL[IRUVSHFLILFGDWDSKRWRVDQGWKHFKHFNOLVWDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKLVOLPLWHGDFFHVVLELOLW\VXUYH\ */(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
( 3XUSRVHDQG6FRSH
3XUSRVH
%XUHDX9HULWDVZDVUHWDLQHGE\WKHFOLHQWWRUHQGHUDQRSLQLRQDVWRWKH3URSHUW\¶VFXUUHQWJHQHUDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQRQWKH GD\RIWKHVLWHYLVLW
%DVHG RQ WKH REVHUYDWLRQV LQWHUYLHZV DQG GRFXPHQW UHYLHZ RXWOLQHG EHORZ WKLV UHSRUW LGHQWLILHV VLJQLILFDQW GHIHUUHG PDLQWHQDQFHLVVXHVH[LVWLQJGHILFLHQFLHVDQGPDWHULDOFRGHYLRODWLRQVRIUHFRUGZKLFKDIIHFWWKH3URSHUW\¶VXVH2SLQLRQV DUHUHQGHUHGDVWRLWVVWUXFWXUDOLQWHJULW\EXLOGLQJV\VWHPFRQGLWLRQDQGWKH3URSHUW\¶VRYHUDOOFRQGLWLRQ7KHUHSRUWDOVR QRWHVFRQVWUXFWLRQV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWKDYHUHDOL]HGRUH[FHHGHGWKHLUW\SLFDOH[SHFWHGXVHIXOOLYHV 7KHSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQRIFRQVWUXFWLRQV\VWHPVDQGUHODWHGFRPSRQHQWVDUHW\SLFDOO\GHILQHGDVEHLQJLQRQHRIILYHFRQGLWLRQ UDWLQJV)RUWKHSXUSRVHVRIWKLVUHSRUWWKHIROORZLQJGHILQLWLRQVDUHXVHG
&RQGLWLRQ5DWLQJV
([FHOOHQW 1HZRUYHU\FORVHWRQHZ
FRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPW\SLFDOO\KDVEHHQLQVWDOOHGZLWKLQWKHSDVW \HDUVRXQGDQGSHUIRUPLQJLWVIXQFWLRQ(YHQWXDOUHSDLURUUHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGZKHQ WKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPHLWKHUUHDFKHVWKHHQGRILWVXVHIXOOLIHRUIDLOVLQVHUYLFH *RRG 6DWLVIDFWRU\DVLV&RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPLVVRXQGDQGSHUIRUPLQJLWVIXQFWLRQW\SLFDOO\ZLWKLQ WKHILUVWWKLUGRILWVOLIHF\FOH+RZHYHULWPD\VKRZPLQRUVLJQVRIQRUPDOZHDUDQGWHDU5HSDLU RUUHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGZKHQWKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPHLWKHUUHDFKHVWKHHQGRILWV XVHIXOOLIHRUIDLOVLQVHUYLFH
)DLU 6KRZLQJ VLJQV RI ZHDU DQG XVH EXW VWLOO VDWLVIDFWRU\ DVLVW\SLFDOO\ QHDUWKHPHGLDQ RI LWV HVWLPDWHGXVHIXOOLIH&RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPLVSHUIRUPLQJDGHTXDWHO\DWWKLVWLPHEXWPD\ H[KLELWVRPHVLJQVRIZHDUGHIHUUHGPDLQWHQDQFHRUHYLGHQFHRISUHYLRXVUHSDLUV5HSDLURU UHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGGXHWRWKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHP¶VFRQGLWLRQDQGRULWVHVWLPDWHG UHPDLQLQJXVHIXOOLIH
3RRU &RPSRQHQW RU V\VWHP LV VLJQLILFDQWO\ DJHGIODZHGIXQFWLRQLQJLQWHUPLWWHQWO\ RU XQUHOLDEO\
GLVSOD\V REYLRXV VLJQV RI GHIHUUHG PDLQWHQDQFH
VKRZV HYLGHQFH RI SUHYLRXV UHSDLU RU
ZRUNPDQVKLSQRWLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKFRPPRQO\DFFHSWHGVWDQGDUGV KDVEHFRPHREVROHWH
RUH[KLELWVDQ LQKHUHQWGHILFLHQF\7KHSUHVHQW FRQGLWLRQ FRXOG FRQWULEXWHWR RU FDXVHWKH GHWHULRUDWLRQ RI FRQWLJXRXV HOHPHQWV RU V\VWHPV (LWKHU IXOO FRPSRQHQW UHSODFHPHQW LV QHHGHGRUUHSDLUVDUHUHTXLUHGWRUHVWRUHWRJRRGFRQGLWLRQSUHYHQWSUHPDWXUHIDLOXUHDQGRU SURORQJXVHIXOOLIH
)DLOHG &RPSRQHQW RU V\VWHP KDV FHDVHG IXQFWLRQLQJ RU SHUIRUPLQJ DV LQWHQGHG 5HSODFHPHQW UHSDLURURWKHUVLJQLILFDQWFRUUHFWLYHDFWLRQLVUHFRPPHQGHGRUUHTXLUHG 1RW$SSOLFDEOH $VVLJQLQJDFRQGLWLRQGRHVQRWDSSO\RUPDNHORJLFDOVHQVHPRVWFRPPRQO\GXHWRWKHLWHP LQTXHVWLRQQRWEHLQJSUHVHQW
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
6FRSH
7KHVWDQGDUGVFRSHRIWKH)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQWLQFOXGHVWKHIROORZLQJ
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
3URYLGHDIXOOGHVFULSWLRQRIWKH3URSHUW\ZLWKGHVFULSWLRQVRIH[LVWLQJV\VWHPVDQGFRPPHQWDU\RQREVHUYHGFRQGLWLRQV 3URYLGHDKLJKOHYHOFDWHJRULFDOJHQHUDOVWDWHPHQWUHJDUGLQJWKHVXEMHFW3URSHUW\¶VFRPSOLDQFHWR7LWOH,,,RIWKH$PHULFDQV ZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW7KLVZLOOQRWFRQVWLWXWHDIXOO$'$VXUYH\EXWZLOOKHOSLGHQWLI\H[SRVXUHWRLVVXHVDQGWKHQHHGIRU IXUWKHUUHYLHZ
2EWDLQEDFNJURXQGDQGKLVWRULFDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKHIDFLOLW\IURPDEXLOGLQJHQJLQHHUSURSHUW\PDQDJHUPDLQWHQDQFH VWDIIRURWKHUNQRZOHGJHDEOHVRXUFH7KHSUHIHUUHGPHWKRGRORJ\LVWRKDYHWKHFOLHQWUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRUEXLOGLQJRFFXSDQW FRPSOHWHD3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
364
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
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
) 2SLQLRQVRI3UREDEOH&RVWV
&RVWHVWLPDWHVDUHDWWDFKHGWKURXJKRXWWKLVUHSRUWZLWKWKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVLQWKHDSSHQGL[ 7KHVH HVWLPDWHV DUH EDVHG RQ,QYRLFH RU %LG 'RFXPHQWV SURYLGHG HLWKHU E\WKH 2ZQHUIDFLOLW\ DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ FRVWV GHYHORSHG E\ FRQVWUXFWLRQ UHVRXUFHV VXFK DV S eans C itestone DQG ars all Swift %XUHDX 9HULWDV¶V H[SHULHQFHZLWKSDVWFRVWVIRUVLPLODUSURSHUWLHVFLW\FRVWLQGH[HVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVUHJDUGLQJIXWXUHHFRQRPLFFRQGLWLRQV 2SLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWVVKRXOGRQO\EHFRQVWUXHGDVSUHOLPLQDU\RUGHURIPDJQLWXGHEXGJHWV$FWXDOFRVWVPRVWSUREDEO\ ZLOO YDU\IURPWKH FRQVXOWDQW¶VRSLQLRQVRISUREDEOH FRVWVGHSHQGLQJRQ VXFKPDWWHUVDVW\SHDQGGHVLJQRI VXJJHVWHG UHPHG\ TXDOLW\ RI PDWHULDOV DQG LQVWDOODWLRQ PDQXIDFWXUHU DQG W\SH RI HTXLSPHQW RU V\VWHP VHOHFWHG ILHOG FRQGLWLRQV ZKHWKHUDSK\VLFDOGHILFLHQF\LVUHSDLUHGRUUHSODFHGLQZKROHSKDVLQJRUEXQGOLQJRIWKHZRUN LIDSSOLFDEOH
TXDOLW\RI
FRQWUDFWRUTXDOLW\RISURMHFWPDQDJHPHQWH[HUFLVHGPDUNHWFRQGLWLRQVXVHRIVXEFRQWUDFWRUVDQGZKHWKHUFRPSHWLWLYH SULFLQJLVVROLFLWHGHWF&HUWDLQRSLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWVFDQQRWEHGHYHORSHGZLWKLQWKHVFRSHRIWKLVJXLGHZLWKRXWIXUWKHU VWXG\2SLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWIRUIXUWKHUVWXG\VKRXOGEHLQFOXGHGLQWKH)&$ )0HWKRGRORJ\
%DVHG XSRQ VLWH REVHUYDWLRQV UHVHDUFK DQG MXGJPHQW DORQJ ZLWK UHIHUHQFLQJ([SHFWHG 8VHIXO /LIH (8/
WDEOHVIURP
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
RIDFRPSRQHQW
RUV\VWHPHTXDOVWKH(8/OHVVLWVeffecti e ageZKHWKHUH[SOLFLWO\RULPSOLFLWO\VWDWHG3URMHFWLRQVRI5HPDLQLQJ8VHIXO/LIH
58/
DUHEDVHGSULPDULO\RQDJHDQGFRQGLWLRQZLWKWKHSUHVXPSWLRQRIFRQWLQXHGXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKH3URSHUW\ VLPLODUWRWKHREVHUYHGDQGUHSRUWHGSDVWXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHSUDFWLFHVLQFRQMXQFWLRQZLWKWKHSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWRI %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VDVVHVVRUV6LJQLILFDQWFKDQJHVLQRFFXSDQWVDQGRUXVDJHPD\DIIHFWWKHVHUYLFHOLIHRIVRPHV\VWHPVRU FRPSRQHQWV
:KHUHTXDQWLWLHVFRXOGQRWEHRUZHUHQRWGHULYHGIURPDQDFWXDOFRQVWUXFWLRQGRFXPHQWWDNHRIIRUIDFLOLW\ZDONWKURXJK DQGRUZKHUHV\VWHPLFFRVWVDUHPRUHDSSOLFDEOHRUSURYLGHPRUHLQWULQVLFYDOXHEXGJHWDU\VTXDUHIRRWDQGJURVVVTXDUH IRRWFRVWVDUHXVHG(VWLPDWHGFRVWVDUHEDVHGRQSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWDQGWKHSUREDEOHRUDFWXDOH[WHQWRIWKHREVHUYHG GHIHFWLQFOXVLYHRIWKHFRVWWRGHVLJQSURFXUHFRQVWUXFWDQGPDQDJHWKHFRUUHFWLRQV )'HILQLWLRQV
,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
,PPHGLDWH 1HHGV DUH OLQH LWHPV WKDW UHTXLUH LPPHGLDWH DFWLRQ DV D UHVXOW RI
PDWHULDO H[LVWLQJ RU SRWHQWLDO XQVDIH
FRQGLWLRQV
IDLOHGRULPPLQHQWIDLOXUHRIPLVVLRQFULWLFDOEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVRU
FRQGLWLRQVWKDWLIQRW
DGGUHVVHGKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHVXOWLQRUFRQWULEXWHWRFULWLFDOHOHPHQWRUV\VWHPIDLOXUHZLWKLQRQH\HDURUZLOOPRVW SUREDEO\UHVXOWLQDVLJQLILFDQWHVFDODWLRQRILWVUHPHGLDOFRVW )RU GDWDEDVH DQG UHSRUWLQJ SXUSRVHV WKH OLQH LWHPV ZLWK 58/ DQG FRPPRQO\ DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK Safet RU Perfor ance ntegrit 3ODQ7\SHVDUHFRQVLGHUHG,PPHGLDWH1HHGV 5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
&RVWOLQHLWHPVWUDGLWLRQDOO\FDOOHG5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV HTXLYDOHQWO\UHIHUUHGWRDV/LIHF\FOH5HQHZDOV
DUHIRUUHFXUULQJ
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
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
5HSODFHPHQW FRVWV DUH VROLFLWHG IURP RZQHUVKLSSURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW %XUHDX 9HULWDV¶V GLVFXVVLRQV ZLWK VHUYLFH FRPSDQLHVPDQXIDFWXUHUV
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDQGSUHYLRXVH[SHULHQFHLQSUHSDULQJVXFKVFKHGXOHVIRURWKHUVLPLODUIDFLOLWLHV &RVWVIRUZRUNSHUIRUPHGE\WKHRZQHUVKLS¶VRUSURSHUW\PDQDJHPHQW¶VPDLQWHQDQFHVWDIIDUHDOVRFRQVLGHUHG %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VUHVHUYHPHWKRGRORJ\LQYROYHVLGHQWLILFDWLRQDQGTXDQWLILFDWLRQRIWKRVHV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVUHTXLULQJ FDSLWDOUHVHUYHIXQGVZLWKLQWKHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRG7KHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRGLVGHILQHGDVWKHHIIHFWLYHDJHSOXVWKHUHVHUYH WHUP$GGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQFRQFHUQLQJV\VWHP¶VRUFRPSRQHQW¶VUHVSHFWLYHUHSODFHPHQWFRVWV LQWRGD\
VGROODUV
W\SLFDO
H[SHFWHG XVHIXO OLYHV DQG UHPDLQLQJ XVHIXO OLYHV ZHUH HVWLPDWHG VR WKDW D IXQGLQJ VFKHGXOH FRXOG EH SUHSDUHG 7KH 5HSODFHPHQW 5HVHUYHV 6FKHGXOH SUHVXSSRVHV WKDW DOO UHTXLUHG UHPHGLDO ZRUN KDV EHHQ SHUIRUPHG RU WKDW PRQLHV IRU UHPHGLDWLRQKDYHEHHQEXGJHWHGIRULWHPVGHILQHGDV,PPHGLDWH1HHGV )RUWKHSXUSRVHVRIµEXFNHWL]LQJ¶WKH6\VWHP([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVWVLQWKLVUHSRUWWKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVKDYHEHHQ VXEGLYLGHGDQGJURXSHGDVIROORZV
6KRUW7HUP
\HDUV
1HDU7HUP
\HDUV
0HGLXP7HUP
\HDUV
DQG/RQJ
7HUP
\HDUV
.H\)LQGLQJV
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
$IDLUO\ FRPPRQ VFHQDULR HQFRXQWHUHG GXULQJWKH DVVHVVPHQW SURFHVV DQG DIUHTXHQW VRXUFH RI GHEDWH RFFXUVZKHQ FODVVLI\LQJDQGGHVFULELQJ³YHU\ROG´V\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWDUHVWLOOIXQFWLRQLQJDGHTXDWHO\DQGGRQRWDSSHDUQRU ZHUHUHSRUWHGWREHLQDQ\ZD\GHILFLHQW7RKHOSSURYLGHVRPHDGGLWLRQDOLQWHOOLJHQFHRQWKHVHLWHPVVXFKFRPSRQHQWV ZLOOEHWDJJHGLQWKHGDWDEDVHDV([FHHGLQJO\$JHG7KLVGHVLJQDWLRQZLOOEHUHVHUYHGIRUPHFKDQLFDORUHOHFWULFDOV\VWHPV RUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWKDYHDJHGZHOOEH\RQGWKHLULQGXVWU\VWDQGDUGOLIHF\FOHVW\SLFDOO\DWOHDVW\HDUVEH\RQGDQGRUWZLFH WKHLU(VWLPDWHG8VHIXO/LIH
(8/
,QWDQGHPZLWKWKLVGHVLJQDWLRQWKHVHLWHPVZLOOEHDVVLJQHGD5HPDLQLQJ8VHIXO/LIH
58/
QRWOHVVWKDQWZR\HDUVEXWQRWJUHDWHUWKDQRIWKHLUVWDQGDUG(8/$VVXFKWKHUHFRPPHQGHGUHSODFHPHQWWLPH IRUWKHVHFRPSRQHQWVZLOOUHVLGHRXWVLGHWKHW\SLFDO6KRUW7HUPZLQGRZEXWZLOOQRWEHSXVKHGµLUUHVSRQVLEO\¶ WRRIDU
LQWR
WKHIXWXUH
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
* &HUWLILFDWLRQ
7KH&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
WKH&OLHQW
UHWDLQHG%XUHDX9HULWDVWRSHUIRUPWKLV)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQWLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWK LWVFRQWLQXHGRSHUDWLRQRIWKH*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLOORFDWHGDW6XQIORZHUDQG*ODGVWRQH6WUHHW*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
WKH³3URSHUW\´,WLVRXUXQGHUVWDQGLQJWKDWWKHSULPDU\LQWHUHVWRIWKH&OLHQWLVWRORFDWHDQGHYDOXDWHPDWHULDOVDQGEXLOGLQJ V\VWHPGHIHFWVWKDWPLJKWVLJQLILFDQWO\DIIHFWWKHYDOXHRIWKHSURSHUW\DQGWRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHSUHVHQW3URSHUW\KDVFRQGLWLRQV WKDWZLOOKDYHDVLJQLILFDQWLPSDFWRQLWVFRQWLQXHGRSHUDWLRQV 7KLVUHSRUWKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGIRUDQGLVH[FOXVLYHO\IRUWKHXVHDQGEHQHILWRIWKH&OLHQWLGHQWLILHGRQWKHFRYHUSDJHRIWKLV UHSRUW7KHSXUSRVHIRUZKLFKWKLVUHSRUWVKDOOEHXVHGVKDOOEHOLPLWHGWRWKHXVHDVVWDWHGLQWKHFRQWUDFWEHWZHHQWKHFOLHQW DQG%XUHDX9HULWDV
7KLVUHSRUWRUDQ\RIWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGWKHUHLQLVQRWIRUWKHXVHRUEHQHILWRIQRUPD\LWEHUHOLHGXSRQE\DQ\ RWKHUSHUVRQRUHQWLW\IRUDQ\SXUSRVHZLWKRXWWKHDGYDQFHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI%XUHDX9HULWDV$Q\UHXVHRUGLVWULEXWLRQ ZLWKRXWVXFKFRQVHQWVKDOOEHDWWKHFOLHQW
VRUUHFLSLHQW
VVROHULVNZLWKRXWOLDELOLW\WR%XUHDX9HULWDV
7KHFRQFOXVLRQVDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVUHSRUWDUHEDVHGRQWKHEULHIUHYLHZRIWKHSODQVDQGUHFRUGVPDGH DYDLODEOH WR RXU 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU GXULQJ WKH VLWH YLVLW LQWHUYLHZV RI DYDLODEOH SURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHO DQG PDLQWHQDQFHFRQWUDFWRUVIDPLOLDUZLWKWKH3URSHUW\DSSURSULDWHLQTXLU\RIPXQLFLSDODXWKRULWLHVRXU3URMHFW0DQDJHU¶VZDON WKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVGXULQJWKHVLWHYLVLWDQGRXUH[SHULHQFHZLWKVLPLODUSURSHUWLHV 1RWHVWLQJH[SORUDWRU\SURELQJGLVPDQWOLQJRURSHUDWLQJRIHTXLSPHQWRULQGHSWKVWXGLHVZHUHSHUIRUPHGXQOHVVVSHFLILFDOO\ UHTXLUHGXQGHUWKHPurpose an ScopeVHFWLRQRIWKLVUHSRUW7KLVDVVHVVPHQWGLGQRWLQFOXGHHQJLQHHULQJFDOFXODWLRQVWR GHWHUPLQHWKHDGHTXDF\RIWKH3URSHUW\¶VRULJLQDOGHVLJQRUH[LVWLQJV\VWHPV$OWKRXJKZDONWKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVZHUH SHUIRUPHGQRWDOODUHDVPD\KDYHEHHQREVHUYHG
VHH6HFWLRQIRUVSHFLILFGHWDLOV
7KHUHPD\EHGHIHFWVLQWKH3URSHUW\
ZKLFKZHUHLQDUHDVQRWREVHUYHGRUUHDGLO\DFFHVVLEOHPD\QRWKDYHEHHQYLVLEOHRUZHUHQRWGLVFORVHGE\PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHOZKHQTXHVWLRQHG7KHUHSRUWGHVFULEHVSURSHUW\FRQGLWLRQVDWWKHWLPHWKDWWKHREVHUYDWLRQVDQGUHVHDUFKZHUH FRQGXFWHG
3UHSDUHGE\
$OYDUR%HGR\D
3URMHFW$VVHVVRU
5HYLHZHGE\
0DU\9HQDEOH5$&(0
3URJUDP0DQDJHU
0DU\9HQDEOH#EXUHDXYHULWDVFRP
[
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
+ $SSHQGLFHV
$SSHQGL[$
3KRWRJUDSKLF5HFRUG
$SSHQGL[%
6LWH3ODQ
$SSHQGL[&
3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
$SSHQGL['
$FFHVVLELOLW\5HYLHZDQG3KRWRV
$SSHQGL[(
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
$SSHQGL[)
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
$SSHQGL[*
2EVHUYDWLRQ*360DS/LQNV
$SSHQGL[+
(TXLSPHQW,QYHQWRU\
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[$
3KRWRJUDSKLF5HFRUG
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP _S
6,*1$*(
6,*1$*( 6,*1$*(
)(1&(6$1' *$7(6 /$1'6&$3,1*
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP _S
3$9('75$,/ 813$9('75$,/
3$5.%(1&+ 3$5.%(1&+
)(1&(6$1' *$7(6 75$6+5(&(37$&/(
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[%
6LWH3ODQ
6LWH3ODQ
3URMHFW1XPEHU 3URMHFW1DPH
5 *OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLO
6RXUFH 2Q6LWH'DWH
*RRJOH (DUWK3UR 1RYHPEHU
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[&
3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
7KH3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
:DV1RW5HWXUQHGWR%9
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL['
$FFHVVLELOLW\5HYLHZDQG3KRWRV
9LVXDO6XUYH\$'$6WDQGDUGVIRU$FFHVVLEOH'HVLJQ 0DMRU,VVXHV
$'$VWXG\
UHFRPPHQGHG
0RGHUDWH,VVXHV
$'$VWXG\
UHFRPPHQGHG
&DWHJRU\ 0LQRU,VVXHV
*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLO
$FFHVVLELOLW\,VVXHV
3DUNLQJ 1$
([WHULRU$FFHVVLEOH5RXWH
%XLOGLQJ(QWUDQFHV 1$
,QWHULRU$FFHVVLEOH5RXWH 1$
(OHYDWRUV 1$
3XEOLF5HVWURRPV 1$
.LWFKHQV.LWFKHQHWWHV 1$
3OD\JURXQGVDQG
6ZLPPLQJ3RROV 1$
2WKHU
1RQH
*be cognizant that if the “None” box is checked that does not guarantee full compliance; this study is limited in nature )DFLOLW\+LVWRU\DQG,QWHUYLHZ
4XHVWLRQ <HV 1R 8QN &RPPHQWV
+DVDQDFFHVVLELOLW\VWXG\EHHQSUHYLRXVO\
SHUIRUPHG",IVRZKHQ"
+DYHDQ\$'$LPSURYHPHQWVEHHQPDGHWR
WKHSURSHUW\VLQFHRULJLQDOFRQVWUXFWLRQ"
'HVFULEH
+DVEXLOGLQJPDQDJHPHQWUHSRUWHGDQ\
DFFHVVLELOLW\EDVHGFRPSODLQWVRUOLWLJDWLRQ"
3URSHUW\1DPH
%93URMHFW1XPEHU
*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLO
5
*OHQGRUD8UEDQ7UDLO
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
$&&(66,%/(3$7+ &85%&87
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[(
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[)
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[*
2EVHUYDWLRQ*360DS/LQNV
Attributes Action Description Location Description Condition Latitude Longitude GPS Map Link Plan Type Helper Label Effective Age Lifespan RUL Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Barcode Park Name AssetCALC ID 8 FT Fence, Wrought Iron 6' Replace Site Good 34.119429 -117.837846 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.119429, -117.837846 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Wrought Iron 8', Replace 5 50 45 18 77.976 1403.568 002453 Glendora Urban Trail 7049543 8 FT Fence, Wrought Iron 6' Replace Site Good 34.114341 -117.845900 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114341, -117.845900 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Wrought Iron 8', Replace 20 50 30 20 77.976 1559.52 002457 Glendora Urban Trail 7049555 Signage, Guide & Directional Replace/Install Site Poor 34.118695 -117.839493 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118695, -117.839493 Performance/Integrity Roadways, Signage, Guide & Directional, Replace/Install 18 20 2 1 216.6 216.6 002487 Glendora Urban Trail 7049536 Precast Concrete Replace Site Fair 34.118696 -117.839423 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118696, -117.839423 Lifecycle/Renewal Park Bench, Precast Concrete, Replace 11 25 14 1 1083 1083 002481 Glendora Urban Trail 7049534 Fence, Chain Link 6' Replace Site Fair 34.118717 -117.839529 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118717, -117.839529 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Chain Link 6', Replace 20 40 20 99999 22.743 2274277.257 Glendora Urban Trail 7049552 Signage, Guide & Directional Replace/Install Site Good 34.114360 -117.845891 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114360, -117.845891 Lifecycle/Renewal Roadways, Signage, Guide & Directional, Replace/Install 7 20 13 1 216.6 216.6 002459 Glendora Urban Trail 70495538 FT Fence, Wrought Iron 6' Replace Site Good 34.118680 -117.839500 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118680, -117.839500 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Wrought Iron 8', Replace 20 50 30 54 77.976 4210.704 002485 Glendora Urban Trail 7049541 Pavement, Asphalt Seal & Stripe Site Fair 34.119894 -117.834483 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.119894, -117.834483 Lifecycle/Renewal Roadways, Pavement, Asphalt, Mill & Overlay 3 5 2 43000 0.48735 20956.05 Glendora Urban Trail 7149554 Precast Concrete Replace Site Good 34.114163 -117.846626 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114163, -117.846626 Lifecycle/Renewal Park Bench, Precast Concrete, Replace 7 25 18 1 1083 1083 002464 Glendora Urban Trail 7049530 Fence, Wrought Iron 4' Replace Site Good 34.114045 -117.846730 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114045, -117.846730 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Wrought Iron 4', Replace 7 50 43 99999 43.32 4331956.68 Glendora Urban Trail 7049540 Concrete, Small Areas/Sections Replace Site Good 34.114093 -117.846819 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114093, -117.846819 Lifecycle/Renewal New Site Asset 5 50 45 50 21.66 1083 Glendora Urban Trail 7049533 Signage, Guide & Directional Replace/Install Site Good 34.119426 -117.837822 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.119426, -117.837822 Lifecycle/Renewal Roadways, Signage, Guide & Directional, Replace/Install 7 20 13 1 216.6 216.6 002454 Glendora Urban Trail 7049542 Property, Monument Replace/Install Site Good 34.114250 -117.846242 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114250, -117.846242 Lifecycle/Renewal Signage, Property, Monument, Replace/Install 8 20 12 1 3249 3249 002456 Glendora Urban Trail 7049557 Property, Monument Replace/Install Site Good 34.118756 -117.833885 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118756, -117.833885 Lifecycle/Renewal Signage, Property, Monument, Replace/Install 5 20 15 1 3249 3249 002452 Glendora Urban Trail 7049539Drip System Replace Site Fair 34.114054 -117.846696 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114054, -117.846696 Lifecycle/Renewal New Site Asset 5 20 15 3150 3.249 10234.35 Glendora Urban Trail 7049546 Pavement, Asphalt Mill & Overlay Site Good 34.119894 -117.834483 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.119894, -117.834483 Lifecycle/Renewal Roadways, Pavement, Asphalt, Mill & Overlay 5 25 20 43000 3.7905 162991.5 Glendora Urban Trail 7049547 Precast Concrete Replace Site Good 34.114128 -117.846697 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114128, -117.846697 Lifecycle/Renewal Park Bench, Precast Concrete, Replace 7 25 18 1 1083 1083 002463 Glendora Urban Trail 7049556 Precast Concrete Replace Site Fair 34.118733 -117.839375 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118733, -117.839375 Lifecycle/Renewal Park Bench, Precast Concrete, Replace 11 25 14 1 1083 1083 002482 Glendora Urban Trail 7049549 Property, Monument Replace/Install Site Good 34.118678 -117.839497 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118678, -117.839497 Lifecycle/Renewal Signage, Property, Monument, Replace/Install 5 20 15 1 3249 3249 002480 Glendora Urban Trail 7049548 Signage, Guide & Directional Replace/Install Site Good 34.119405 -117.837905 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.119405, -117.837905 Lifecycle/Renewal Roadways, Signage, Guide & Directional, Replace/Install 7 20 13 1 216.6 216.6 002455 Glendora Urban Trail 7049531 Precast Concrete Replace Site Good 34.114090 -117.846796 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114090, -117.846796 Lifecycle/Renewal Park Bench, Precast Concrete, Replace 7 25 18 1 1083 1083 002462 Glendora Urban Trail 7049532 8 FT Fence, Wrought Iron 6' Replace Site Good 34.114066 -117.846926 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114066, -117.846926 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Wrought Iron 8', Replace 20 50 30 20 77.976 1559.52 002479 Glendora Urban Trail 7049554 Fence, Chain Link 4' Replace Site Fair 34.114329 -117.845897 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114329, -117.845897 Lifecycle/Renewal Fences & Gates, Fence, Chain Link 4', Replace 33 40 7 99999 19.494 1949380.506 Glendora Urban Trail 7049551 Property, Monument Replace/Install Site Fair 34.118720 -117.839392 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118720, -117.839392 Lifecycle/Renewal Signage, Property, Monument, Replace/Install 10 20 10 1 3249 3249 002483 Glendora Urban Trail 7049535 Signage, Guide & Directional Replace/Install Site Good 34.114353 -117.845896 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114353, -117.845896 Lifecycle/Renewal Roadways, Signage, Guide & Directional, Replace/Install 7 20 13 1 216.6 216.6 002460 Glendora Urban Trail 7049550 Signage, Guide & Directional Replace/Install Site Poor 34.118682 -117.839487 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118682, -117.839487 Performance/Integrity Roadways, Signage, Guide & Directional, Replace/Install 18 20 2 1 216.6 216.6 002486 Glendora Urban Trail 7049544 Control Panel Replace Site Fair 34.114028 -117.846686 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114028, -117.846686 Lifecycle/Renewal New Site Asset 5 15 10 1 5415 5415 002465 Glendora Urban Trail 7049545 Property, Monument Replace/Install Site Good 34.114326 -117.845911 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.114326, -117.845911 Lifecycle/Renewal Signage, Property, Monument, Replace/Install 8 20 12 1 3249 3249 002461 Glendora Urban Trail 7049538 Medium-Duty Metal or Precast Replace Site Fair 34.118708 -117.839461 https://www.google.com/maps?q=+34.118708, -117.839461 Lifecycle/Renewal Trash Receptacle, Medium-Duty Metal or Precast, Replace 12 20 8 1 758.1 758.1 002484 Glendora Urban Trail 7049537 1 of 1
*/(1'25$85%$175$,/ %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[+
(TXLSPHQW,QYHQWRU\
1R(TXLSPHQW3UHVHQW
2Q7KLV6LWH
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD0HGLDQV
0XOWLSOH/RFDWLRQV
*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
prepared for
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
(DVW)RRWKLOO%RXOHYDUG
*OHQGRUD&DOLIRUQLD
0LFKDHO6OHGG
35(3$5('%<
Bureau Veritas
6021 University Boulevard, Suite 200
Ellicott City, Maryland 21043
www.us.bureauveritas.com
%9&217$&7
Mary Venable, CEM, RA
Program Manager
800.733.0660 x7292719
[email protected]
%9352-(&7
158691.23R000-055.468
'$7(2)5(3257
January 9, 2024
216,7('$7(
October 16-20, 2023
Bureau Veritas
8QLYHUVLW\%RXOHYDUG6XLWH_(OOLFRWW&LW\0DU\ODQG_ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S )$&,/,7<&21',7,21$66(660(17
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
7$%/( 2)&217(176
([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\ 3RUWIROLR2YHUYLHZDQG$VVHVVPHQW'HWDLOV 3RUWIROLR/HYHO)LQGLQJVDQG'HILFLHQFLHV )DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ,QGH[
)&,
,PPHGLDWH1HHGV 3RUWIROLR/HYHO.H\)LQGLQJV 3ODQ7\SHV 6LWH
$PHOLD7ULDQJOH 6LWH
$XWR&HQWHU'ULYH 6LWH
%DVHOLQH5RDG 6LWH
%DVHOLQH$FFHVV0HGLDQV 6LWH
(GJHPRQW,VODQG 6LWH
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH 6LWH
*OHQZRRG,VODQG
6LWH
*UDQG$YHQXH 6LWH
-HQLIHUDQG0DXQD/RD 6LWH
.UHJPRQW$YHQXH 6LWH
/RQH+LOO$YHQXH 6LWH
3DORSLQWR,VODQG 6LWH
5RXWH 6LWH
:RRGFURIW,VODQG 3URSHUW\6SDFH8VHDQG2EVHUYHG$UHDV $'$$FFHVVLELOLW\ 3XUSRVHDQG6FRSH
2SLQLRQVRI3UREDEOH&RVWV 0HWKRGRORJ\ 'HILQLWLRQV &HUWLILFDWLRQ $SSHQGLFHV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\
3RUWIROLR 2YHUYLHZ DQG $VVHVVPHQW'HWDLOV
*HQHUDO,QIRUPDWLRQ
3URSHUW\7\SHV 6WUHHWPHGLDQV
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV
/RFDWLRQV $GGUHVV
'DWH
V
RI9LVLW 2FWREHU
0DQDJHPHQW3RLQWRI&RQWDFW
0LFKDHO6OHGG$VVLVWDQW3XEOLF:RUNV'LUHFWRU
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
PVOHGG#FLW\RIJOHQGRUDRUJ
2QVLWH3RLQWRI&RQWDFW
32&
8QHVFRUWHG
$VVHVVPHQWDQG5HSRUW3UHSDUHG%\ $OYDUR%HGR\D
5HYLHZHG%\
0DU\9HQDEOH&(05$
3URJUDP0DQDJHU
0DU\9HQDEOH#EXUHDXYHULWDVFRP
[
$VVHW&DOF/LQN )XOOGDWDVHWIRUWKLVDVVHVVPHQWFDQEHIRXQGDW
KWWSV
ZZZDVVHWFDOFQHW
$PHOLD7ULDQJOH
,VODQGDW,6RI$PHOLD$YHQXH DQG&RXQWU\&OXE'ULYH
$XWR&HQWHU'ULYH
/RQH+LOOHDVWWR2YHUSDVV
QRUWK DQG VRXWK VLGHV
%DVHOLQH5RDG
%DUUDQFD$YHQXHHDVWWR*OHQGRUD$YHQXHLQFOXGLQJ DFFHVVPHGLDQV %DVHOLQH$FFHVV0HGLDQV
QRUWKRIWKHFHQWHUPHGLDQRQ%DVHOLQH5RDGDWWKHIUHHZD\RQUDPS 'DQHKXUVW $YHQXH
$FURVVIURP'DQHKXUVW$YHQXH 1$1RWKLQJWR&ROOHFW (GJHPRQW,VODQG
1RUWK (GJHPRQW3ODFH ,VODQGDWWKHHQGRIFXOGXVDF *OHQGRUD$YHQXH
%DVHOLQHQRUWKWR(DVW :DOQXW$YHQXH
*OHQZRRG,VODQG
$FURVVIURP1RUWK *OHQZRRG$YHQXH
*UDQG$YHQXH
$UURZ+LJKZD\ WR6LHUUD0DGUH
-HQLIHUDQG 0DXQD/RD
$FURVVIURP6RXWK-HQLIHU$YHQXH
.UHJPRQW$YHQXH
%HWZHHQ3DOP$YHQXH DQG 5RVH'ULYH
/RQH+LOO$YHQXH
*ODGVWRQHWRMXVWQRUWKRI5RXWH
3DORSLQWR,VODQG
$FURVVIURP3DORSLQWR$YHQXH
5RXWH
%DUUDQFD$YHQXH HDVWWR&DWDUDFW$YHQXH
,QFDFFHVVPHGLDQ
:RRGFURIW,VODQG
$FURVVIURP(DVW :RRGFURIW$YHQXH
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
3RUWIROLR/HYHO)LQGLQJVDQG 'HILFLHQFLHV
+LVWRULFDO6XPPDU\
7KLVVXUYH\LQYHVWLJDWHVWKHFRQGLWLRQ DQGVLJQLILFDQWFDSLWDODVVHWVRIWKHVWUHHWPHGLDQVWKURXJKRXWWKH&LW\ RI*OHQGRUD 7KHPHGLDQVDUHRIYDU\LQJDJHV
$UFKLWHFWXUDO
7KHVWUHHWPHGLDQVFRQWDLQQRVWUXFWXUHVRUVLJQLILFDQWEXLOWDVVHWV 0HFKDQLFDO(OHFWULFDODQG3OXPELQJ
0(3
0HGLDQVWKURXJKRXWWKH&LW\ FRQWDLQOLPLWHG 0(3 HTXLSPHQW SULPDULO\LUULJDWLRQHTXLSPHQW DQG VRPH OLJKWLQJIRU VWUHHW VLJQV0DMRUVWUHHWOLJKWVDUHRZQHGE\WKHSRZHUFRPSDQ\DQGDUHH[FOXGHGIURPWKLVVXUYH\7KHLUULJDWLRQHTXLSPHQWLV JHQHUDOO\LQ JRRGFRQGLWLRQZLWKQRVLJQLILFDQWLVVXHVREVHUYHG 6LWH
0HGLDQVDUHJHQHUDOO\ODQGVFDSHGZLWKZDWHUFRQVHUYLQJVKUXEVDQGWUHHVZKLFKZHUHREVHUYHGWREHLQJRRG FRQGLWLRQ RYHUDOO 6RPH PHGLDQV DUH KDUGVFDSHG ZLWK VWRQH UXEEOH ZLWKRXW SODQWLQJV ,Q JHQHUDO WKH PHGLDQV KDYH EHHQ ZHOO PDLQWDLQHG DQGURXWLQHPDLQWHQDQFHLVUHFRPPHQGHG
5HFRPPHQGHG$GGLWLRQDO6WXGLHV
1RDGGLWLRQDOVWXGLHVUHFRPPHQGHGDWWKLVWLPH
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ,QGH[
)&,
2QHRIWKHPDMRUJRDOVRIWKH)&$LVWRFDOFXODWHHDFKEXLOGLQJ¶V )DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ,QGH[ )&,
ZKLFKSURYLGHVDWKHRUHWLFDO
REMHFWLYH LQGLFDWLRQRIDEXLOGLQJ¶VRYHUDOOFRQGLWLRQ%\GHILQLWLRQWKH)&,LVGHILQHGDVWKHUDWLRRIWKHFRVWRIFXUUHQW QHHGV GLYLGHGE\ FXUUHQWUHSODFHPHQWYDOXH
&59
RIWKHIDFLOLW\7KHFKDUWEHORZSUHVHQWVWKHLQGXVWU\VWDQGDUG UDQJHVDQGFXW RIISRLQWV
)&,5DQJHVDQG 'HVFULSWLRQ
± ,QQHZRUZHOOPDLQWDLQHGFRQGLWLRQZLWKOLWWOHRUQRYLVXDOHYLGHQFHRIZHDURUGHILFLHQFLHV ± 6XEMHFWHGWRZHDUEXWLVVWLOOLQDVHUYLFHDEOHDQGIXQFWLRQLQJFRQGLWLRQ ± 6XEMHFWHGWRKDUGRUORQJWHUPZHDU1HDULQJWKHHQGRILWVXVHIXORUVHUYLFHDEOHOLIH DQGDERYH +DVUHDFKHGWKHHQGRILWVXVHIXORUVHUYLFHDEOHOLIH5HQHZDOLVQRZQHFHVVDU\ 7KHGHILFLHQFLHVDQGOLIHF\FOHQHHGVLGHQWLILHGLQWKLVDVVHVVPHQWSURYLGHWKHEDVLVIRUDSRUWIROLRZLGHFDSLWDOLPSURYHPHQW IXQGLQJVWUDWHJ\,QDGGLWLRQWRWKHFXUUHQW)&,H[WHQGHG)&,¶VKDYHEHHQGHYHORSHGWRSURYLGHRZQHUVWKHLQWHOOLJHQFH QHHGHGWRSODQDQGEXGJHWIRUWKH³NHHSXSFRVWV´IRUWKHLUIDFLOLWLHV$VVXFKWKH\HDU\HDUDQG\HDU)&,¶VDUH FDOFXODWHGE\GLYLGLQJWKHDQWLFLSDWHGQHHGVRI WKRVHUHVSHFWLYHWLPHSHULRGVE\FXUUHQWUHSODFHPHQWYDOXH$VDILQDOSRLQW WKH)&,¶VXOWLPDWHO\SURYLGHPRUHYDOXHZKHQXVHGWRUHODWLYHO\FRPSDUHIDFLOLWLHVDFURVVDSRUWIROLRLQVWHDG RI EHLQJRYHU DQDO\]HGDQGVFUXWLQL]HGDVVWDQGDORQHYDOXHV7KHWDEOHEHORZVXPPDUL]HVWKHLQGLYLGXDO ILQGLQJVIRUWKLV )&$
1RWH
WKH)&,VFRUHVIRUWKLVSRUWIROLRDUHEDVHGRQWKHYDOXHRIWKHLPSURYHPHQWVRQO\QRWLQFOXGLQJFXUEV7KXVWKH)&, VKRZQLQWKHLOOXVWUDWLRQVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKHUHFXUULQJFRVWVRIFDSLWDOUHSODFHPHQWVSOXVLQIODWLRQIRUGHIHUUHGFRVWV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
1RLPPHGLDWHQHHGVZHUHLGHQWLILHG
3RUWIROLR/HYHO.H\)LQGLQJV
%DFNIORZ3UHYHQWHULQ3RRU
FRQGLWLRQ
'RPHVWLF:DWHU
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YHQXH
0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
'
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFHLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWHJUDYHO6XUIDFH*UDYHO
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*OHQGRUD
$YHQXH 0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQQHHGVWREHILQLVKHG$VVHW&$/&,'
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWHJUDYHO6XUIDFH*UDYHO
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*OHQGRUD
$YHQXH 0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQQHHGVILQLVK$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWH6WRQH6XUIDFH*UDYHO
/RQH+LOO$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV/RQHKLOO
$YHQXH0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
:LWKRXWDVXUIDFHPHGLDQDQGLQQHHGRIILQLVKLQJ$VVHW&$/&,'
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWH6WRQH6WRQHVRQFXUE
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YHQXH
0$
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWHJUDYHO6XUIDFH*UDYHO
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*OHQGRUD
$YH0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQQHHGVILQLVK$VVHW&$/&,'
%DFNIORZ3UHYHQWHULQ3RRU
FRQGLWLRQ
'RPHVWLF:DWHU
5RXWH6WUHHW0HGLDQV0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
'
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFHLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
/HDNLQJ$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
,UULJDWLRQ6\VWHPLQ3RRU
FRQGLWLRQ
'ULS6\VWHP
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YHQXH
0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFH,QVWDOOLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHU&RQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
,UULJDWLRQ6\VWHPLQ3RRU
FRQGLWLRQ
'ULS6\VWHP
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YHQXH
0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFH,QVWDOOLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
3ODQ7\SHV
(DFKOLQHLWHPLQWKHFRVWGDWDEDVHLVDVVLJQHGD3ODQ7\SHZKLFKLVWKHSULPDU\UHDVRQRUUDWLRQDOHIRUWKHUHFRPPHQGHG UHSODFHPHQWUHSDLURURWKHUFRUUHFWLYHDFWLRQ7KLVLVWKH³ZK\´SDUWRIWKHHTXDWLRQ$FRVWRUOLQHLWHPPD\FRPPRQO\ KDYHPRUHWKDQRQHDSSOLFDEOH3ODQ7\SH
KRZHYHURQO\RQH3ODQ7\SHZLOOEHDVVLJQHGEDVHGRQWKH³EHVW´ILWW\SLFDOO\ WKHRQHZLWKWKHJUHDWHVWVLJQLILFDQFH
3ODQ7\SH'HVFULSWLRQV
6DIHW\ $QREVHUYHGRUUHSRUWHGXQVDIHFRQGLWLRQWKDWLIOHIWXQDGGUHVVHGFRXOGUHVXOWLQ LQMXU\
DV\VWHPRUFRPSRQHQWWKDWSUHVHQWVSRWHQWLDOOLDELOLW\ULVN 3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\ &RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPKDVIDLOHGLVDOPRVWIDLOLQJSHUIRUPVXQUHOLDEO\GRHVQRW SHUIRUPDVLQWHQGHGDQGRUSRVHVULVNWRRYHUDOOV\VWHPVWDELOLW\ $FFHVVLELOLW\ 'RHVQRWPHHW$'$8)$6DQGRURWKHUDFFHVVLELOLW\UHTXLUHPHQWV (QYLURQPHQWDO ,PSURYHPHQWVWRDLURUZDWHUTXDOLW\LQFOXGLQJUHPRYDORIKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOV IURPWKHEXLOGLQJRUVLWH
5HWURILW$GDSWDWLRQ &RPSRQHQWVV\VWHPVRUVSDFHVUHFRPPHQGHGIRUXSJUDGHVLQLQRUGHUWRPHHW FXUUHQWVWDQGDUGVIDFLOLW\XVDJHRUFOLHQWRFFXSDQWQHHGV /LIHF\FOH5HQHZDO $Q\FRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPWKDWLVQRWFXUUHQWO\GHILFLHQWRUSUREOHPDWLFEXWIRU ZKLFKIXWXUHUHSODFHPHQWRUUHSDLULVDQWLFLSDWHGDQGEXGJHWHG 3ODQ7\SH'LVWULEXWLRQ
E\&RVW
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
$PHOLD7ULDQJOH
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV ,VODQGDWLQWHUVHFWLRQ RI$PHOLD$YHQXH DQG&RXQWU\&OXE'ULYH 1XPEHU RI0HGLDQV 2QH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܆ տ ܈܆ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± ,55,*$7,21 %2;
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± &85%:,7+5()/(&7,9(6,*16
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
$XWR&HQWHU'ULYH
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV /RQH+LOOHDVWWR2YHUSDVV
QRUWKDQGVRXWK VLGHV
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 7KUHH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ )DLU
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV %URNHQFXUEV
,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܈ տ ܈܆ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 0(',$129(59,(:
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 6,*1$*(
± 6,*1$*( ± 62/$532:(5('&$0(5$
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
%DVHOLQH5RDG
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV %DUUDQFD$YHQXH HDVWWR*OHQGRUD$YHQXH LQFOXGLQJ DFFHVVPHGLDQV 1XPEHURI0HGLDQV )RXU
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܈܈ տ ܈܆ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܆܈* RRG
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± /$1'6&$3(
± 75$)),& 6,*1$*( ± 62/$532:(5('&$0(5$
± ,55,*$7,216<67(0
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
%DVHOLQH$FFHVV0HGLDQV
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV QRUWKRIWKHFHQWHUPHGLDQRQ%DVHOLQH5RDG DWWKHIUHHZD\RQUDPS 1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 7KUHH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܆ տ ܆ տ տ ܈
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܈܈
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 0(',$129(59,(:
± 75$)),&6,*1
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
(GJHPRQW,VODQG
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV 1RUWK (GJHPRQW3ODFH ,VODQGDWWKHHQGRIFXOGXVDF 1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 2QH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ )DLU
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1R FXUEVQRWLUULJDWLRQSUHVHQWELJWUHHZDVFXWGRZQDQGKDVQRWEHHQUHSODFHG ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܈܆ տ ܆ տ ܈ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܈܆
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± %2//$5'&29(5)259$/9(
± :$7(59$/9(
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV %DVHOLQHQRUWKWR(DVW :DOQXW$YHQXH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 6L[
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 6RPHPHGLDQVDUHXQGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQHLWKHUPLVVLQJODQGVFDSHLUULJDWLRQRUVWRQHILQLVK ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
տ ܈ ܈܆ տ ܈܈
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆( DLU
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆* RRG
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWHJUDYHO6XUIDFH*UDYHO
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*OHQGRUD
$YHQXH 0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQQHHGVWREHILQLVKHG$VVHW&$/&,'
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWHJUDYHO6XUIDFH*UDYHO
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*OHQGRUD
$YHQXH0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQQHHGVILQLVK$VVHW&$/&,'
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWHJUDYHO6XUIDFH*UDYHO
*OHQGRUD$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*OHQGRUD
$YHQXH 0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQQHHGVILQLVK$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 0(',$181'(5&216758&7,21
± %$&.)/2: ± 5$,/&5266,1*
± /$1'6&$3(,55,*$7,21 ± 62/$532:(5('&$0(5$
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
*OHQZRRG,VODQG
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV $FURVVIURP1RUWK *OHQZRRG$YHQXH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 2QH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܈ տ ܆ տ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± %$&.)/2:35(9(17(5
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± ,55,*$7,21
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
*UDQG$YHQXH
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV $UURZ+LJKZD\ WR6LHUUD0DGUH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 7KLUW\(LJKW
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 0HGLDQVXQGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ PHGLDQURRWVDUHGDPDJLQJWKHFXUE ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
տ ܈ ܈܆ տ ܈܈
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܆܈( DLU
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܆܈( DLU
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
%DFNIORZ3UHYHQWHULQ3RRU
FRQGLWLRQ
'RPHVWLF:DWHU
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YHQXH
0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
'
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFHLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWH6WRQH6WRQHVRQFXUE
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YHQXH
0$
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
,UULJDWLRQ6\VWHPLQ3RRU
FRQGLWLRQ
'ULS6\VWHP
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YHQXH
0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFH,QVWDOOLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHU&RQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
,UULJDWLRQ6\VWHPLQ3RRU
FRQGLWLRQ
'ULS6\VWHP
*UDQG$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV*UDQG$YH0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSODFH,QVWDOOLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
8QGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0$-256,*1$*( ± /,*+76
± /$1'6&$3( ± ,55,*$7,213$1(/6
± 0(',$181'(55(129$7,21 ± 62/$532:(5('&$0(5$
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
-HQLIHUDQG 0DXQD/RD
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV $FURVVIURP6RXWK -HQLIHU$YHQXH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 2QH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܈ տ ܈܆ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJV ZHUHLGHQWLILHG IRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
0(',$129(59,(: ± %$&.)/2:35(9(17(5
± ,55,*$7,21
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
.UHJPRQW$YHQXH
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV %HWZHHQ3DOP$YHQXHDQG5RVH'ULYH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV )RXU
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܈ տ ܆ տ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 3$/075((6
± ,55,*$7,213$1(/ ± %/$&.)/2:35(9(17(5
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
/RQH+LOO$YHQXH
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV *ODGVWRQHWRMXVWQRUWKRI5RXWH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 7HQ
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ )DLU
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 0HGLDQ
LQQHHGRIILQLVKLQJDWVRPHRIWKHPHGLDQVWKH LUULJDWLRQLVH[SRVHG ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܈ տ ܈܆ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܆܈* RRG
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܆܈* RRG
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWH6WRQH6XUIDFH*UDYHO
/RQH+LOO$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV/RQHKLOO
$YHQXH 0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
:LWKRXWD VXUIDFHPHGLDQDQGLQQHHGRIILQLVKLQJ$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 5$,/&5266,1*6,*16
± %$&.)/2:35(9(17(5 ± 6721(),1,6+
± /$1'6&$3( ± 62/$532:(5('&$0(5$
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3DORSLQWR,VODQG
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV $FURVVIURP3DORSLQWR$YHQXH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 2QH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܈ տ ܈܆ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈* RRG
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 0(',$129(59,(:
± %$&.)/2:35(9(17(5
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
5RXWH
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV %DUUDQFD$YHQXH HDVWWR&DWDUDFW$YHQXH
,QFOXGLQJ DFFHVVPHGLDQ
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV )RUW\)LYH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ *RRG
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 0HGLDQEDFNIORZ SUHYHQWHULVOHDNLQJJHQHUDOO\ LQJRRGFRQGLWLRQDQGZHOOPDLQWDLQHG ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
տ ܈ ܈܆ տ ܈܈
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈( DLU
(OHFWULFLW\ ܆܈( DLU
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܆܈( DLU
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
0HGLDQVLQ3RRUFRQGLWLRQ
$JJUHJDWH6WRQH6XUIDFH*UDYHO
/RQH+LOO$YHQXH6WUHHW0HGLDQV/RQHKLOO
$YHQXH 0
8QLIRUPDW&RGH
*
5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
5HSOHQLVKLQ
3ULRULW\6FRUH
3ODQ7\SH
3HUIRUPDQFH,QWHJULW\
&RVW(VWLPDWH
:LWKRXWD VXUIDFHPHGLDQDQGLQQHHGRIILQLVKLQJ$VVHW&$/&,'
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± 9$/9(3527(&7,21
± %$&.)/2:35(9(17(5 ± 7<3(2)/$1'6&$3,1*
± ,55,*$7,216<67(03$1(/6 ± 62/$532:(5('&$0(5$
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
:RRGFURIW,VODQG
6LWH
6\VWHPV6XPPDU\
$GGUHVV $FURVVIURP(DVW :RRGFURIW$YHQXH
1XPEHURI0HGLDQV 2QH
2YHUDOO&RQGLWLRQ )DLU
.H\,VVXHVDQG)LQGLQJV 1RQHREVHUYHGDWWLPHRIDVVHVVPHQW ,WHP 'HVFULSWLRQ
/DQGVFDSLQJ
7UHHV *UDVV )ORZHU
%HGV 3ODQWHUV
'URXJKW
7ROHUDQW
3ODQWV
'HFRUDWLYH
6WRQH 1RQH
܆܈ տ ܈܆ տ տ
6LWH$SSXUWHQDQFHV 3UHVHQW 1RW3UHVHQW &RQGLWLRQ
,UULJDWLRQ ܆܈
(OHFWULFLW\ ܈܆
0DMRU6LJQDJH ܈܆
3HGHVWULDQ&URVVLQJ ܈܆
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
6\VWHPV([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVW
7KHYHUWLFDOEDUVEHORZUHSUHVHQWWKH\HDUE\\HDUQHHGVLGHQWLILHGIRUWKHVLWH7KHRUDQJHOLQHLQWKHJUDSKEHORZIRUHFDVWV ZKDWZRXOGKDSSHQWRWKH)&,
OHIW<D[LV
RYHUWLPHDVVXPLQJ]HURFDSLWDOH[SHQGLWXUHV RYHUWKHQH[WWHQ\HDUV7KHGROODU DPRXQWV DOORFDWHGIRUHDFK\HDU
EOXHEDUV
DUHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDOXHV DORQJWKHULJKW<D[LV 1HHGVE\<HDUZLWK8QDGGUHVVHG)&,2YHU7LPH
6LWH
.H\)LQGLQJV
1RNH\ILQGLQJVZHUHLGHQWLILHGIRUWKLVVHWRIORFDWLRQV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6LWH
3KRWRJUDSKLF2YHUYLHZ
± 0(',$129(59,(: ± /$1'6&$3,1*
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
3URSHUW\6SDFH8VHDQG2EVHUYHG$UHDV
$UHDV2EVHUYHG
$OORIWKHOLVWHGPHGLDQVZHUHREVHUYHGLQRUGHUWRJDLQDFOHDUXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIWKHSURSHUWLHV¶ RYHUDOOFRQGLWLRQ &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
$'$$FFHVVLELOLW\
6HFWLRQLVQRWDSSOLFDEOH1RQHRIWKHPHGLDQVFRQWDLQSHGHVWULDQZDONZD\V &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
3XUSRVHDQG 6FRSH
3XUSRVH
%XUHDX9HULWDV ZDVUHWDLQHGE\WKHFOLHQWWRUHQGHUDQRSLQLRQDVWRWKH3URSHUW\¶VFXUUHQWJHQHUDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQRQWKH GD\RIWKHVLWHYLVLW
%DVHG RQ WKH REVHUYDWLRQV LQWHUYLHZV DQG GRFXPHQW UHYLHZ RXWOLQHG EHORZ WKLV UHSRUW LGHQWLILHV VLJQLILFDQW GHIHUUHG PDLQWHQDQFHLVVXHVH[LVWLQJGHILFLHQFLHVDQGPDWHULDOFRGHYLRODWLRQVRIUHFRUGZKLFKDIIHFWWKH3URSHUW\¶VXVH2SLQLRQV DUHUHQGHUHG DVWRLWVVWUXFWXUDOLQWHJULW\EXLOGLQJV\VWHPFRQGLWLRQDQGWKH3URSHUW\¶VRYHUDOOFRQGLWLRQ7KHUHSRUWDOVR QRWHVEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWKDYHUHDOL]HGRUH[FHHGHGWKHLUW\SLFDOH[SHFWHGXVHIXOOLYHV 7KHSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQRIEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVDQGUHODWHGFRPSRQHQWVDUHW\SLFDOO\GHILQHGDVEHLQJLQRQHRIILYHFRQGLWLRQ UDWLQJV)RUWKHSXUSRVHVRIWKLVUHSRUWWKHIROORZLQJGHILQLWLRQVDUHXVHG
&RQGLWLRQ5DWLQJV
([FHOOHQW
1HZRUYHU\FORVHWRQHZ
FRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPW\SLFDOO\KDVEHHQLQVWDOOHGZLWKLQWKHSDVW \HDUVRXQGDQGSHUIRUPLQJLWVIXQFWLRQ(YHQWXDOUHSDLURUUHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGZKHQ WKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPHLWKHUUHDFKHVWKHHQGRILWVXVHIXOOLIHRUIDLOVLQVHUYLFH *RRG
6DWLVIDFWRU\DVLV&RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPLVVRXQGDQGSHUIRUPLQJLWVIXQFWLRQW\SLFDOO\ZLWKLQ WKHILUVWWKLUGRILWVOLIHF\FOH+RZHYHULWPD\VKRZPLQRUVLJQVRIQRUPDOZHDUDQGWHDU5HSDLU RUUHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGZKHQWKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPHLWKHUUHDFKHVWKHHQGRILWV XVHIXOOLIHRUIDLOVLQVHUYLFH
)DLU
6KRZLQJ VLJQV RI ZHDU DQG XVH EXW VWLOO VDWLVIDFWRU\ DVLVW\SLFDOO\ QHDUWKHPHGLDQ RI LWV HVWLPDWHGXVHIXOOLIH&RPSRQHQWRUV\VWHPLVSHUIRUPLQJDGHTXDWHO\DWWKLVWLPHEXWPD\ H[KLELWVRPHVLJQVRIZHDUGHIHUUHGPDLQWHQDQFHRUHYLGHQFHRISUHYLRXV UHSDLUV5HSDLURU UHSODFHPHQWZLOOEHUHTXLUHGGXHWRWKHFRPSRQHQWRUV\VWHP¶VFRQGLWLRQDQGRULWVHVWLPDWHG UHPDLQLQJXVHIXOOLIH
3RRU
&RPSRQHQW RU V\VWHP LV VLJQLILFDQWO\ DJHGIODZHGIXQFWLRQLQJ LQWHUPLWWHQWO\ RU XQUHOLDEO\
GLVSOD\V REYLRXV VLJQV RI GHIHUUHG PDLQWHQDQFH
VKRZV HYLGHQFH RI SUHYLRXV UHSDLU RU
ZRUNPDQVKLSQRWLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKFRPPRQO\DFFHSWHGVWDQGDUGV KDVEHFRPHREVROHWH
RUH[KLELWVDQ LQKHUHQWGHILFLHQF\7KHSUHVHQW FRQGLWLRQ FRXOG FRQWULEXWHWRRU FDXVHWKH GHWHULRUDWLRQ RI FRQWLJXRXV HOHPHQWV RU V\VWHPV (LWKHU IXOO FRPSRQHQW UHSODFHPHQW LV QHHGHGRUUHSDLUVDUHUHTXLUHGWRUHVWRUHWRJRRGFRQGLWLRQSUHYHQWSUHPDWXUHIDLOXUHDQGRU SURORQJXVHIXOOLIH
)DLOHG &RPSRQHQW RU V\VWHP KDV FHDVHG IXQFWLRQLQJ RU SHUIRUPLQJ DV LQWHQGHG 5HSODFHPHQW UHSDLURURWKHUVLJQLILFDQWFRUUHFWLYHDFWLRQLVUHFRPPHQGHGRUUHTXLUHG 1RW$SSOLFDEOH $VVLJQLQJDFRQGLWLRQGRHVQRWDSSO\RUPDNHORJLFDOVHQVHPRVWFRPPRQO\GXHWRWKHLWHP LQTXHVWLRQQRWEHLQJSUHVHQW
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
6FRSH
7KHVWDQGDUGVFRSHRIWKH)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQWLQFOXGHVWKHIROORZLQJ
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
3URYLGHDIXOOGHVFULSWLRQRIWKH3URSHUW\ZLWKGHVFULSWLRQVRILQSODFHV\VWHPVDQGFRPPHQWDU\RQREVHUYHGFRQGLWLRQV 3URYLGHDKLJKOHYHOFDWHJRULFDOJHQHUDOVWDWHPHQWUHJDUGLQJWKHVXEMHFW3URSHUW\¶VFRPSOLDQFHWR7LWOH,,,RIWKH$PHULFDQV ZLWK'LVDELOLWLHV$FW7KLVZLOOQRWFRQVWLWXWHDIXOO$'$VXUYH\EXWZLOOKHOSLGHQWLI\H[SRVXUHWRLVVXHVDQGWKHQHHGIRU IXUWKHUUHYLHZ
2EWDLQEDFNJURXQGDQGKLVWRULFDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKHIDFLOLW\IURPDEXLOGLQJHQJLQHHUSURSHUW\PDQDJHUPDLQWHQDQFH VWDIIRURWKHUNQRZOHGJHDEOHVRXUFH7KHSUHIHUUHGPHWKRGRORJ\LVWRKDYHWKHFOLHQWUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRUEXLOGLQJRFFXSDQW FRPSOHWHD3UH6XUYH\4XHVWLRQQDLUH
364
LQDGYDQFHRIWKHVLWHYLVLW&RPPRQDOWHUQDWLYHVLQFOXGHDYHUEDOLQWHUYLHZ MXVWSULRUWRRUGXULQJWKHZDONWKURXJKSRUWLRQRIWKHDVVHVVPHQW 2EVHUYHDUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDPSOHRIWKHVSDFHV WRJDLQDFOHDUXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIWKHSURSHUWLHV¶ RYHUDOOFRQGLWLRQ 3URYLGHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRUDGGLWLRQDOVWXGLHVLIUHTXLUHGZLWKUHODWHGEXGJHWDU\LQIRUPDWLRQ 3URYLGH DQ ([HFXWLYH 6XPPDU\ DW WKH EHJLQQLQJ RI WKLV UHSRUW ZKLFK KLJKOLJKWV NH\ ILQGLQJV DQG LQFOXGHV D )DFLOLW\ &RQGLWLRQ,QGH[DVDEDVLVIRUFRPSDULQJWKHUHODWLYHFRQGLWLRQVRIWKHEXLOGLQJVZLWKLQWKHSRUWIROLR &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
2SLQLRQVRI3UREDEOH&RVWV
&RVWHVWLPDWHVDUHDWWDFKHGWKURXJKRXWWKLVUHSRUWZLWKWKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVLQWKHDSSHQGL[ 7KHVH HVWLPDWHV DUH EDVHG RQ,QYRLFH RU%LG 'RFXPHQWV SURYLGHG HLWKHU E\ WKH 2ZQHUIDFLOLW\ DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ FRVWV GHYHORSHG E\ FRQVWUXFWLRQ UHVRXUFHV VXFK DV R.S. Means, CBRE Whitestone, DQG Marshall & Swift, %XUHDX 9HULWDV¶V H[SHULHQFHZLWKSDVWFRVWVIRUVLPLODUSURSHUWLHVFLW\FRVWLQGH[HVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVUHJDUGLQJIXWXUHHFRQRPLFFRQGLWLRQV 2SLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWVVKRXOGRQO\EHFRQVWUXHGDVSUHOLPLQDU\RUGHURIPDJQLWXGHEXGJHWV$FWXDOFRVWVPRVWSUREDEO\ ZLOO YDU\IURPWKH FRQVXOWDQW¶V RSLQLRQV RI SUREDEOH FRVWVGHSHQGLQJ RQ VXFKPDWWHUVDVW\SHDQGGHVLJQ RI VXJJHVWHG UHPHG\ TXDOLW\ RI PDWHULDOV DQG LQVWDOODWLRQ PDQXIDFWXUHU DQG W\SH RI HTXLSPHQW RU V\VWHP VHOHFWHG ILHOG FRQGLWLRQV ZKHWKHUDSK\VLFDOGHILFLHQF\LVUHSDLUHGRU UHSODFHGLQZKROHSKDVLQJRUEXQGOLQJRIWKHZRUN LIDSSOLFDEOH
TXDOLW\RI
FRQWUDFWRUTXDOLW\RISURMHFWPDQDJHPHQWH[HUFLVHGPDUNHWFRQGLWLRQVXVHRIVXEFRQWUDFWRUVDQGZKHWKHUFRPSHWLWLYH SULFLQJLVVROLFLWHGHWF&HUWDLQRSLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWVFDQQRWEHGHYHORSHGZLWKLQWKHVFRSHRIWKLVJXLGHZLWKRXWIXUWKHU VWXG\2SLQLRQVRISUREDEOHFRVWIRU IXUWKHUVWXG\VKRXOGEHLQFOXGHGLQWKH)&$ 0HWKRGRORJ\
%DVHG XSRQ VLWH REVHUYDWLRQV UHVHDUFK DQG MXGJPHQW DORQJ ZLWK UHIHUHQFLQJ ([SHFWHG 8VHIXO /LIH (8/
WDEOHVIURP
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
RIDFRPSRQHQW
RUV\VWHPHTXDOVWKH(8/OHVVLWVeffective ageZKHWKHUH[SOLFLWO\RULPSOLFLWO\VWDWHG3URMHFWLRQVRI5HPDLQLQJ8VHIXO/LIH
58/
DUHEDVHGSULPDULO\RQDJHDQGFRQGLWLRQZLWKWKHSUHVXPSWLRQRIFRQWLQXHGXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKH3URSHUW\ VLPLODUWRWKHREVHUYHGDQGUHSRUWHGSDVWXVHDQGPDLQWHQDQFHSUDFWLFHVLQFRQMXQFWLRQZLWKWKHSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWRI %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VDVVHVVRUV6LJQLILFDQWFKDQJHVLQRFFXSDQWVDQGRUXVDJHPD\DIIHFWWKHVHUYLFHOLIHRIVRPHV\VWHPVRU FRPSRQHQWV
:KHUHTXDQWLWLHVFRXOGQRWEHRUZHUHQRWGHULYHGIURPDQDFWXDOFRQVWUXFWLRQGRFXPHQWWDNHRIIRUIDFLOLW\ZDONWKURXJK DQGRUZKHUHV\VWHPLFFRVWVDUHPRUHDSSOLFDEOHRUSURYLGHPRUHLQWULQVLFYDOXHEXGJHWDU\VTXDUHIRRWDQGJURVVVTXDUH IRRWFRVWVDUH XVHG(VWLPDWHGFRVWVDUHEDVHGRQSURIHVVLRQDOMXGJPHQWDQGWKHSUREDEOHRUDFWXDOH[WHQWRIWKHREVHUYHG GHIHFWLQFOXVLYHRIWKHFRVWWRGHVLJQSURFXUHFRQVWUXFWDQGPDQDJHWKHFRUUHFWLRQV 'HILQLWLRQV
,PPHGLDWH1HHGV
,PPHGLDWH 1HHGV DUH OLQH LWHPV WKDW UHTXLUH LPPHGLDWH DFWLRQ DV D UHVXOW RI
PDWHULDO H[LVWLQJ RU SRWHQWLDO XQVDIH
FRQGLWLRQV
IDLOHGRULPPLQHQWIDLOXUHRIPLVVLRQFULWLFDOEXLOGLQJV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVRU
FRQGLWLRQVWKDWLIQRW
DGGUHVVHGKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHVXOWLQRUFRQWULEXWHWRFULWLFDOHOHPHQWRUV\VWHPIDLOXUHZLWKLQRQH\HDURUZLOOPRVW SUREDEO\UHVXOWLQDVLJQLILFDQWHVFDODWLRQRILWVUHPHGLDOFRVW )RU GDWDEDVH DQG UHSRUWLQJ SXUSRVHV WKH OLQH LWHPV ZLWK 58/ DQG FRPPRQO\ DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK Safety RU Performance/Integrity 3ODQ7\SHVDUHFRQVLGHUHG,PPHGLDWH1HHGV &,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
&RVWOLQHLWHPVWUDGLWLRQDOO\FDOOHG5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV HTXLYDOHQWO\UHIHUUHGWRDV/LIHF\FOH5HQHZDOV
DUHIRUUHFXUULQJ
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
5HSODFHPHQW FRVWV DUH VROLFLWHG IURP RZQHUVKLSSURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW %XUHDX 9HULWDV¶V GLVFXVVLRQV ZLWK VHUYLFH FRPSDQLHVPDQXIDFWXUHUV
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDQGSUHYLRXVH[SHULHQFHLQSUHSDULQJVXFKVFKHGXOHVIRURWKHUVLPLODUIDFLOLWLHV &RVWVIRUZRUNSHUIRUPHGE\WKHRZQHUVKLS¶VRUSURSHUW\PDQDJHPHQW¶VPDLQWHQDQFHVWDIIDUHDOVRFRQVLGHUHG %XUHDX9HULWDV¶VUHVHUYHPHWKRGRORJ\LQYROYHVLGHQWLILFDWLRQDQGTXDQWLILFDWLRQRIWKRVHV\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVUHTXLULQJ FDSLWDOUHVHUYHIXQGVZLWKLQWKHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRG7KHDVVHVVPHQWSHULRGLVGHILQHGDVWKHHIIHFWLYHDJHSOXVWKHUHVHUYH WHUP$GGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQFRQFHUQLQJV\VWHP¶VRUFRPSRQHQW¶VUHVSHFWLYHUHSODFHPHQWFRVWV LQWRGD\
VGROODUV
W\SLFDO
H[SHFWHG XVHIXO OLYHV DQG UHPDLQLQJ XVHIXO OLYHV ZHUH HVWLPDWHG VR WKDW D IXQGLQJ VFKHGXOH FRXOG EH SUHSDUHG 7KH 5HSODFHPHQW 5HVHUYHV 6FKHGXOH SUHVXSSRVHV WKDW DOO UHTXLUHG UHPHGLDO ZRUN KDV EHHQ SHUIRUPHG RU WKDW PRQLHV IRU UHPHGLDWLRQKDYHEHHQEXGJHWHGIRULWHPVGHILQHGDV,PPHGLDWH1HHGV )RUWKHSXUSRVHVRIµEXFNHWL]LQJ¶WKH6\VWHP([SHQGLWXUH)RUHFDVWVLQWKLVUHSRUWWKH5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHVKDYHEHHQ VXEGLYLGHGDQGJURXSHGDVIROORZV
6KRUW7HUP
\HDUV
1HDU7HUP
\HDUV
0HGLXP7HUP
\HDUV
DQG/RQJ
7HUP
\HDUV
.H\)LQGLQJV
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
$IDLUO\ FRPPRQ VFHQDULR HQFRXQWHUHG GXULQJWKH DVVHVVPHQW SURFHVV DQG DIUHTXHQW VRXUFH RI GHEDWH RFFXUVZKHQ FODVVLI\LQJDQGGHVFULELQJ³YHU\ROG´V\VWHPVRUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWDUHVWLOOIXQFWLRQLQJDGHTXDWHO\DQGGRQRWDSSHDUQRU ZHUHUHSRUWHGWREHLQDQ\ZD\GHILFLHQW7RKHOSSURYLGHVRPHDGGLWLRQDOLQWHOOLJHQFHRQWKHVHLWHPVVXFKFRPSRQHQWV ZLOOEHWDJJHGLQWKHGDWDEDVHDV([FHHGLQJO\$JHG7KLVGHVLJQDWLRQZLOOEHUHVHUYHGIRUPHFKDQLFDORUHOHFWULFDOV\VWHPV RUFRPSRQHQWVWKDWKDYHDJHGZHOOEH\RQGWKHLULQGXVWU\VWDQGDUGOLIHF\FOHVW\SLFDOO\DWOHDVW\HDUVEH\RQGDQGRUWZLFH WKHLU(VWLPDWHG8VHIXO/LIH
(8/
,QWDQGHPZLWKWKLVGHVLJQDWLRQWKHVHLWHPVZLOOEHDVVLJQHGD5HPDLQLQJ8VHIXO/LIH
58/
QRWOHVVWKDQWZR\HDUVEXWQRWJUHDWHUWKDQRIWKHLUVWDQGDUG(8/$VVXFKWKHUHFRPPHQGHGUHSODFHPHQWWLPH IRUWKHVHFRPSRQHQWVZLOOUHVLGHRXWVLGHWKHW\SLFDO6KRUW7HUPZLQGRZEXWZLOOQRWEHSXVKHGµLUUHVSRQVLEO\¶ WRRIDU
LQWR
WKHIXWXUH
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
&HUWLILFDWLRQ
7KH&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
WKH&OLHQW
UHWDLQHG%XUHDX9HULWDV WRSHUIRUPWKLV)DFLOLW\&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQWLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWK LWV FRQWLQXHG RSHUDWLRQ RI &LW\ RI *OHQGRUD 0HGLDQV 0XOWLSOH /RFDWLRQV *OHQGRUD &DOLIRUQLD WKH ³3URSHUW\´ ,W LV RXU XQGHUVWDQGLQJWKDWWKHSULPDU\LQWHUHVWRIWKH&OLHQWLVWRORFDWHDQGHYDOXDWHPDWHULDOVDQGEXLOGLQJV\VWHPGHIHFWVWKDW PLJKWVLJQLILFDQWO\DIIHFWWKHYDOXHRIWKHSURSHUW\DQGWRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHSUHVHQW3URSHUW\KDVFRQGLWLRQVWKDWZLOOKDYHD VLJQLILFDQWLPSDFWRQLWVFRQWLQXHGRSHUDWLRQV
7KHFRQFOXVLRQVDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVUHSRUWDUHEDVHGRQWKHEULHIUHYLHZRIWKHSODQVDQGUHFRUGVPDGH DYDLODEOH WR RXU 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU GXULQJ WKH VLWH YLVLW LQWHUYLHZV RI DYDLODEOH SURSHUW\ PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHO DQG PDLQWHQDQFHFRQWUDFWRUVIDPLOLDUZLWKWKH3URSHUW\DSSURSULDWHLQTXLU\RIPXQLFLSDODXWKRULWLHVRXU3URMHFW0DQDJHU¶VZDON WKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVGXULQJWKHVLWHYLVLWDQGRXUH[SHULHQFHZLWKVLPLODUSURSHUWLHV 1RWHVWLQJH[SORUDWRU\SURELQJGLVPDQWOLQJRURSHUDWLQJRIHTXLSPHQWRULQGHSWK VWXGLHVZHUHSHUIRUPHGXQOHVVVSHFLILFDOO\ UHTXLUHGXQGHUWKHPurpose and Scope VHFWLRQ RIWKLVUHSRUW7KLVDVVHVVPHQWGLGQRWLQFOXGHHQJLQHHULQJFDOFXODWLRQVWR GHWHUPLQHWKHDGHTXDF\RIWKH3URSHUW\¶VRULJLQDOGHVLJQRUH[LVWLQJV\VWHPV$OWKRXJKZDONWKURXJKREVHUYDWLRQVZHUH SHUIRUPHGQRWDOODUHDVPD\KDYH EHHQREVHUYHG
VHH6HFWLRQ IRUVSHFLILFGHWDLOV
7KHUHPD\EHGHIHFWVLQWKH3URSHUW\
ZKLFKZHUHLQDUHDVQRWREVHUYHGRUUHDGLO\DFFHVVLEOHPD\QRWKDYHEHHQYLVLEOHRUZHUHQRWGLVFORVHGE\PDQDJHPHQW SHUVRQQHOZKHQTXHVWLRQHG7KHUHSRUWGHVFULEHVSURSHUW\FRQGLWLRQVDWWKHWLPHWKDWWKHREVHUYDWLRQVDQGUHVHDUFKZHUH FRQGXFWHG
7KLVUHSRUWKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGIRUDQGLVH[FOXVLYHO\IRUWKHXVHDQGEHQHILWRIWKH&OLHQWLGHQWLILHGRQWKHFRYHUSDJHRIWKLV UHSRUW7KHSXUSRVHIRUZKLFKWKLVUHSRUWVKDOOEHXVHGVKDOOEHOLPLWHGWRWKHXVHDVVWDWHGLQWKHFRQWUDFWEHWZHHQWKHFOLHQW DQG%XUHDX9HULWDV
7KLVUHSRUWRUDQ\RIWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGWKHUHLQLVQRWIRUWKHXVHRUEHQHILWRIQRUPD\LWEHUHOLHGXSRQE\DQ\ RWKHUSHUVRQRUHQWLW\IRUDQ\SXUSRVHZLWKRXWWKHDGYDQFHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI%XUHDX9HULWDV$Q\UHXVHRUGLVWULEXWLRQ ZLWKRXWVXFKFRQVHQWVKDOOEHDWWKHFOLHQW
VRUUHFLSLHQW
VVROHULVNZLWKRXWOLDELOLW\WR%XUHDX9HULWDV
3UHSDUHGE\
$OYDUR%HGR\D
3URMHFW$VVHVVRU
5HYLHZHGE\
0DU\9HQDEOH5$&(0
3URJUDP0DQDJHU
0DU\9HQDEOH#EXUHDXYHULWDVFRP
[
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_ S
$SSHQGLFHV
$SSHQGL[$
6LWH3ODQ
$SSHQGL[%
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
$SSHQGL[&
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[$
6LWH3ODQ
6LWH3ODQ
3URMHFW1XPEHU 3URMHFW1DPH
5 &LW\RI*OHQGRUD0HGLDQV
6RXUFH 2Q6LWH'DWH
*RRJOH(DUWK3UR 1RYHPEHU
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[%
&RPSRQHQW&RQGLWLRQ5HSRUW
&,7<2)*/(1'25$0(',$16 %85($89(5,7$6352-(&7
5
ZZZXVEXUHDXYHULWDVFRP_S
$SSHQGL[&
5HSODFHPHQW5HVHUYHV
Attachment F
Overview of California Municipal Finance: Property Taxes, Bonds, and Key Propositions
1. Municipal Finance and Property Taxes
Municipal finance in California primarily relies on property taxes, sales taxes, and fees for municipal services. Historically, property taxes have been a vital revenue source for cities, funding essential services including public safety, parks, libraries, and infrastructure.
2. Proposition 13 (1978)
Proposition 13 significantly limited California cities' revenue-raising ability by:
x Capping property taxes at 1% of assessed valuation.
x Limiting annual increases in assessed valuation to 2%, unless a property is sold or substantially improved.
x Requiring a two-thirds voter approval for new local taxes, including bond measures funded by property taxes.
This proposition dramatically constrained local government budgets, shifting reliance to alternative revenue sources.
3. Proposition 46 (1986)
Proposition 46 reaffirmed local governments' ability to issue General Obligation (GO) bonds funded by property tax increases for capital improvements such as parks, public buildings, infrastructure, and emergency services facilities. However, these GO bonds require two-thirds (66.7%) voter approval.
4. Voting Requirements for Facility Bond Measures and Parcel Tax Measures Under current law:
x City council-initiated General Obligation bond measures require a two-thirds (66.7%) voter approval.
x City council-initiated parcel tax measure for infrastructure improvements requires a twothirds (66.7%) voter approval. This type of measure is typically for a specific duration of time (e.g. 20 to 40 years); proceeds can be used to issue debt if that is an allowable use noted in the proposed ordinance.
5. Citizen Initiatives and the 50% Threshold
Recent court decisions, notably City of Upland v. California Cannabis Coalition (2017), clarified by subsequent litigation, established that citizen-sponsored initiatives placed on the ballot by voter petitions only require a simple majority (50% + 1) for approval. This significantly lowers the threshold and provides a strategic advantage for community groups or citizens seeking to fund municipal projects or impose special taxes without the higher barrier of two-thirds voter approval.
Specific examples of special parcel tax measures that passed under the 50%+1 citizen initiative legal framework are Measure G in San Francisco (2018) and Measure AA in Oakland (2018).
Attachment F
Overview of California Municipal Finance: Property Taxes, Bonds, and Key Propositions
6. ACA 5 (2024) and its Failure to Pass
ACA 5, placed on the November 2024 ballot, proposed reducing the voter approval threshold for certain municipal infrastructure bond measures initiated by local governments from two-thirds to 55%. The failure of ACA 5 maintained the existing high threshold of two-thirds voter approval, preserving the status quo. Consequently, the dynamic established by Proposition 13 and Proposition 46 remains unchanged, continuing the significant hurdle cities face when seeking voter approval for infrastructure funding.
Summary of Voting Thresholds Post-ACA 5 Failure
Measure Origin Required Approval
City Council-Initiated GO Bonds or Parcel Tax Two-thirds (66.7%) voter approval Citizen-Initiated Bonds/Special Taxes/Parcel Tax Simple majority (50% + 1) voter approval Key Implications:
x Proposition 13 and Proposition 46 continue to restrict cities' financial flexibility. x Citizen initiatives remain a powerful tool for circumventing the two-thirds requirement. x The failure of ACA 4 to pass maintains the challenging environment for city-sponsored infrastructure funding, reinforcing the importance of citizen-led initiatives in municipal finance.
7. Potential Changes to the Tax Landscape
In May 2025, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA) submitted two ballot measures to the California Attorney General’s Office, which is the first step to prepare a petition to circulate for signatures to place them on the ballot next year. Both measures are titled the Save Proposition 13 Act of 2026:
x The first version would eliminate changes to Proposition 13 that have been created through the courts (e.g. Upland decision)
x It would require special local taxes to be approved by two-thirds of voters and the elected officials of the local government. It would also bar local governments from increasing general property taxes in their communities.
x The first version would void all property taxes enacted prior to the passage of the measure that were not approved by two-thirds of voters.
x The only difference in the second version of the ballot measure is that it removes the retroactivity section noted above.
These measures are similar to a HTJA sponsored measure that the California Supreme Court removed from the ballot last year after Governor Newsom filed a lawsuit against it. The proposed changes “are within the electorate’s prerogative to enact,” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote, “but because those changes would substantially alter our basic plan of government, the proposal cannot be enacted by initiative. It is instead governed by the procedures for revising our Attachment F
Overview of California Municipal Finance: Property Taxes, Bonds, and Key Propositions
Constitution” — whereby proposed revisions must be submitted to voters by a supermajority of the Legislature or a constitutional convention.
!"
!
!
#
$
%&
'
!"
'!!
&%
'"$
(!
)
%
'"'
!
*
"
'%
++
,
! "#
*
-#"!
(#
#.#$
/!
01
"!2
23
2 3
(
!
!%(3
%"!%#
(
$
$(3
!"
422
(%!
!"!
#
' 3
(!
/
!
(#
#.#$
/!
!
$%
$%
&#
+!
#5
#3
63
#(%
'
##!+ !
!'
''!!
!"
'(#
(
!(
%'
(%
( $&&#
'"3
+ 4('
&
!
%
!'
#!
%
/'#(%
0#
#
#1
)(%
%
( %*$
+#
7
'(#
/&!
8 !(#
!
(#/
##
2
9 :
;
<=:
#/#
'
'
>
?
)
@
=
-? )
>+
-
7
-
A
B
-
!
!
"#
$
%
%
&
'
()*+,
%-.
*,,
%
/0
12
2 (%
3
B
(
2
%
%
&
#& %
$
%
%
&
'
()4,
%5+
*,,
%
/-
12
2 (%
3
<
C
D
?
?
B
-
CC
D
?
?
B
C
-
?>
E
B
-
C,
-
?>
E
B
C
+F
-
*
>+
>
B
-
C=
+F
-
*
>+
>
B
C7
+
)>
B
-
CA
+
)>
B
C
>
C<
)
)>
B
-
)
)>
B
C
G
- -
% '& %$$%
' ,%'
!&
! &
%#
-&
!
" !
%
(
'#!
!"'"
+("#
(H'!
(/!#
(!/
2"!
(%
&-
&4% !
%!%#
"
'"
#
&
6
!!/$((!
2"!
!
04:1
#'
#
'#
B
?$(4(
!
!%(3
!
&
/!3
*
/#
((2
!"!I
+
#
CC7
(
'!
ATTACHMENT H
01240.0002 2004977.4 1
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GLENDORA ORDERING THE SUBMISSION
OF A PROPOSITION INCURRING BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF
THE CITY OF GLENDORA AT A [SPECIAL/REGULAR]
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON _____ AND
CONSOLIDATED WITH THE ____ ELECTION, FOR
THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE COST OF THE
CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, REPAIR AND
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ________________,
LOCATED IN THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Glendora (the "City") is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City desires to undertake certain public infrastructure improvements for certain City facilities, consisting of the construction, repair, improvements, and/or rehabilitation (the “Improvements”) of the Glendora Public Library and ______________ (collectively, the "City Facilities"); and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to call an election for the proposition of incurring a bonded indebtedness and to issue such bonds to finance the Improvements to the City Facilities pursuant to certain provisions of the California Government Code, including Article 1 of Chapter 4 of Division 4 of Title 4 (commencing with Section 43600) and Article 4.5 of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 (commencing with Section 53506) (collectively, the "Bond Laws"); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to issue its general obligation bonds (the "Bonds") under and pursuant to the Bond Laws to finance the cost of the Improvements to the City Facilities; and
WHEREAS, under existing law, approval of the Bonds requires 2/3 of the voters in the City voting on the proposition to vote in favor; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 43603, when a city planning commission and the legislative body approve a group of improvements, constituting a city plan, the legislative body may submit a single bond measure covering the entire group of improvements; and
WHERAS, the Glendora Planning Commission and the City Council have previously approved the City Facilities as a group of improvements; and
ATTACHMENT H
01240.0002 2004977.4 2
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 43607, the City has adopted Resolution No. ____ on ____, by a two-thirds vote of its members determining that the public interest and necessity demand the completion of the Improvements to the City Facilities; and WHEREAS, the City desires that a measure be presented to the voters related to the issuance of the Bonds for the Improvements to the City Facilities; and WHEREAS, concurrently herewith, the City is adopting Resolution No. ____ (“Resolution Calling Election”), calling the election which provides the measure to be presented to the voters related to the issuance of the Bonds (“Measure”); and WHEREAS, if the Measure is approved by the requisite number of affirmative votes, the City will be authorized to issue the Bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1. Purpose and Intent. Pursuant to the authority provided by the Bond Laws and the California Elections Code, the City Council proposes to order the submission of a proposition authorizing the City to issue the Bonds to the qualified voters of the City at the [special/regular] municipal election to be held on _____. The [special/general] municipal election shall be consolidated with any other elections to be held on such date in the County of Los Angeles.
2. Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings with respect to the Measure for the Bonds:
(i) The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. ___ adopted on _____ and the City Council, pursuant to Resolution No. ___ adopted on ___have approved the City Facilities as a group of Improvements to in order to finance the Improvements in one measure.
(ii) On ____, the City Council adopted, by a two-thirds vote of all its members, a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Glendora Determining that the Public Interest and Necessity Demand the Construction and Improvement of the City Facilities, and its Financing Through the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds," pursuant to which the City Council has found and determined that the public interest and necessity demand the issuance of the Bonds to finance the Improvements to the City Facilities.
(iii) In order to provide for the issuance by the City of the Bonds, it is necessary for the City Council to adopt an ordinance ordering the submission of the proposition of incurring bonded indebtedness for such purpose to the qualified voters of the City at a [special/regular] municipal election.
ATTACHMENT H
01240.0002 2004977.4 3
(iv) The City Council desires to submit said Measure the qualified voters of the City at the [special/regular] election to be held in the City on ______, and to consolidate the bond election with other elections held within the City on that date.
3. Call for Election. The City Council hereby orders that there be submitted to the qualified voters of the City a proposition on incurring bonded indebtedness for the purposes set forth in this Ordinance, at the consolidated election to be held on _____.
4. Ballot Proposition. The City Council hereby submits to the qualified voters of the City, at the [special/regular] election to be held on ______, a proposition on issuing the Bonds. The statement of the Measure shall be in substantially the form set forth in the Resolution Calling Election.
5. Object and Purpose of Bonds. The object and purpose of the Bonds is to finance some or all of the costs of the Improvements to the City Facilities. The authorized Improvements also include all work and expenditures necessary and incidental to the City Facilities described above. Examples of such work and expenditures include, but are not limited to: costs of design, engineering, architect and other professional services, inspections, site preparation, utilities, landscaping, construction management and other planning and permitting, legal, accounting and similar costs; a customary construction contingency; demolition and disposal of existing structures; rental or construction of storage facilities and other space on an interim basis for materials and other equipment and furnishings displaced during construction; addressing unforeseen conditions revealed by construction or renovation, and other necessary improvements required to comply with existing building codes and other applicable law, including the Americans with Disabilities Act; costs of the bond election; bond issuance costs; project administration during the duration of the Improvements; and financing and interest costs on the Bonds.
The final costs, locations, designs, layouts and other components of the Improvements to the City Facilities will be determined as plans are finalized, construction bids are awarded, and the Improvements are completed. Therefore, the City Council cannot guarantee that the Bonds will provide sufficient funds to allow completion of all needed Improvements.
6. Estimated Cost of Improvements. The estimated cost of the Improvements to the City Facilities is $______. The estimated cost includes legal or other fees, the costs of printing the Bonds, and other costs and expenses incidental to or connected with the authorization, issuance and sale of the Bonds. To the extent the Improvements to the City Facilities financed are revenue-producing public works, the cost of the Improvements may also include bond interest estimated to accrue during the construction period and for a period of not to exceed 12 months after completion of construction.
7. Principal Amount of Bonds. The aggregate principal of the Bonds shall not exceed $_________________.
ATTACHMENT H
01240.0002 2004977.4 4
8. Maximum Interest Rate. The maximum rate of interest to be paid on the Bonds shall be the statutory maximum of 12% per annum. Said interest shall be payable semiannually, except that interest for the first year after the date of the Bonds may be made payable at the end of said year.
9. Issuance and Sale of Bonds. The City proposes to issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the Bond Laws, in one or more series, in the maximum amount and for the objects and purposes set forth above if the requisite number of qualified voters voting on the proposition vote in favor thereof. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City payable from and secured by ad valorem taxes levied and collected in the manner prescribed by the laws of the State of California. The revenue generated from the ad valorem tax levied and collected will be used for the payment of debt service on the Bonds. All of the Bonds shall be equally and ratably secured, without priority, by the taxing power of the City.
10. Manner of Conducting Election. The election on the Bonds held on ______ shall be held and conducted, election officers appointed, voting precincts designated, ballots printed, polls opened and closed, ballots counted, and returned, returns canvassed, results declared, and all other proceedings incidental to and connected with the election shall be regulated and done in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the election with which it is consolidated.
11. Procedure for Voting on Proposition. Ballots for the election shall be provided in the form and in the number provided by law. Voters shall be provided an opportunity to vote for or against the proposition on the ballot, in accordance with procedures to be adopted by the authorized officers of the County of Los Angeles (the "County") charged with conducting the election.
12. Accountability Requirements. The City Council hereby adopts the following accountability requirements relating to the Bonds:
(i) The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds shall be used only for the purposes specified in this Ordinance.
(ii) The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds shall only be spent on projects and programs that serve the jurisdiction of the City.
(iii) [The City shall conduct an annual, independent performance audit to ensure that the Bond funds are expended pursuant to the local program specified in clause (i) and (ii).]
(iv) [The City shall appoint a citizens' oversight committee to ensure that Bond proceeds are expended only for the purposes described in the measure approved by the voters. Members appointed to the oversight committee shall receive educational training about bonds and fiscal oversight.]
ATTACHMENT H
01240.0002 2004977.4 5
(v) A separate account shall be created and held by the City, into which the proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited and applied solely for the purpose of financing the Improvements to the City Facilities. (vi) The City's Director of Finance shall file a report with the City Council at least annually showing the amount of Bond proceeds collected and expended, and the status of the Improvements.
13. Identification of Tax. The tax imposed by this measure is an ad valorem tax levied upon taxable real property in the City, and will be used to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds.
14. Official Actions. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Finance, the City Clerk, and any of their designees, are hereby authorized to execute any documents and to perform all acts necessary to place the Measure on the ballot.
15. Interpretation. The provisions of this Ordinance, being necessary for the health, welfare, and safety of the City and its residents, are to be liberally interpreted to carry out its purposes. No error, irregularity or informality, and no neglect or omission of any officer, in any proceeding taken related to the submission of the proposition incurring bonded indebtedness to the qualified voters of the City shall void or invalidate any such proceeding, any Bonds issued by the City or any levy of ad valorem taxes to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds.
16. Publication of Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be published once a day for at least seven days in a newspaper published at least six days a week in the City, or once a week for two weeks in a newspaper published less than six days a week in the City. The first of said publications shall, in either event, be within 15 days after the adoption of this Ordinance. If there are no such newspapers, it shall be posted in three public places in the City for two succeeding weeks.
17. Effective Date. In accordance with Section 36937(a) of the California Government Code, this Ordinance shall become effective immediately, as an ordinance relating to an election, upon its adoption by two-thirds vote of all the members of this City Council.
18. CEQA. Placing the Measure on the ballot is a fiscal and administrative activity that is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (‘CEQA”) review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and (b)(5) because it involves fiscal and administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect changes to the environment.
19. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this
ATTACHMENT H
01240.0002 2004977.4 6
Ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. The provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable.
20. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of and the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ___ day of __________ 2025.
BY:
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT H
01240.0002 2004977.4 7
CERTIFICATION
I, Kathleen R. Sessman, City Clerk of the City of Glendora, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced for first reading on the _____ day of ______, 2025. Thereafter, said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of ______, 2025, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I further certify that said Ordinance was published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Glendora, California on the _____ day of ______, 2025.
Dated:
KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN
City Clerk/Communications Director
ATTACHMENT I
01240.0002 2004979.5
ORDINANCE NO. ____.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GLENDORA PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL PARCEL TAX TO FUND THE
CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, IMPROVEMENTS, AND/OR
REHABILITATION OF THE _________, GLENDORA PUBLIC LIBRARY AND __________
WHEREAS, the City of Glendora (the "City") is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City desires to undertake certain public infrastructure improvements for certain City facilities, consisting of the construction, repair, improvements, and/or rehabilitation (the “Improvements”) of the Glendora Public Library and ______________ (collectively, the "City Facilities"); and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to call an election for the proposition of incurring a special parcel tax to finance the Improvements constituting public infrastructure of the City pursuant to certain provisions of the Article 3.7 of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (Sections 53720-53730) and the California Constitution XIII A, Section 4 and XIII D, Section 3(a)(2) (“collectively, the “Laws”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to submit a special parcel tax measure to the voters (the “Measure”) pursuant to the Elections Code and the Laws to finance the cost of the Improvements to the City Facilities; and
WHEREAS, under existing law, approval of the Measure requires two-thirds (2/3) of the voters in the City voting on the Measure to vote in favor; and WHEREAS, if the Measure is approved by the requisite number of affirmative votes, the City will be authorized to levy the special parcel tax for the purposes set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDORA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: PURPOSES
It is the intent of the City Council of the City of Glendora in adopting this Ordinance to provide for a parcel tax to be imposed as a special tax for the Improvement of the City Facilities.
SECTION 2: AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Chapter 3.56 is hereby added to the City of Glendora Municipal Code to read in its entirety as follows:
ATTAHCMENT I
2 "CHAPTER 3.56 CITY FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT TAX”
SECTION 3.56.010 TITLE
The Title of this Chapter shall be the “City Facilities Improvement Tax Ordinance of the City of Glendora”
SECTION 3.56.020 AUTHORITY TO ADOPT MEASURE
This chapter and the tax authorized herein is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Article 3.7 of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (Sections 53720-53730) and the California Constitution Articles XIII A, Section 4 and XIII D, Section 3(a)(2). The tax authorized herein is special parcel tax.
SECTION 3.56.030 PURPOSES
The purpose of this chapter is to provide a method of financing the Improvements to the City Facilities, as defined herein.
SECTION 3.56.040 DEFINITIONS
“Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel of land that is identifiable by an Assessor’s Parcel Number by the County Assessor of the County.
“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means an identification number assigned to a parcel by the County Assessor of the County.
“City Facilities” means the Glendora Public Library, ___________ and ____. “County” means the County of Los Angeles.
“Fiscal Year” means the period from and including July 1st of any year to and including the following June 30th.
“Improvements” means the construction, repair, improvement, rehabilitation, furnishing and equipping of the City Facilities.
“Maximum Special Parcel Tax” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 3.56.050. “Property” means a lot or a parcel of land or any parcel with an Assessor’s Parcel Number or, if no number, clearly identifiable as a parcel as determined by the City Engineer by May 1 of the year preceding of the Fiscal Year in which the tax will be levied. [TO CONFIRM]
ATTAHCMENT I
3 “Special Parcel Tax” means the special parcel tax levied on properties in the city pursuant to the terms of this chapter.
SECTION 3.56.050 MAXIMUM TAX RATE/METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
(1) Maximum Rate: Each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year [2026-2027], each Assessor’s Parcel of Property within the city shall be subject to a maximum tax in an amount of $___ [Per parcel/Per Acre/Per Square Foot] (the “Maximum Special Parcel Tax”). The Maximum Special Parcel Tax shall increase annually on July 1 of each Fiscal Year by two percent (2%) per year.
(2) Annual Levy: The city may levy the Special Parcel Tax annually by resolution on all non-exempt properties in the city. In any year, the city may by resolution levy at a rate lower than the Maximum Special Parcel Tax; provided however that, the Maximum Special Parcel Tax shall continue to increase as provided in subsection (1) above. (3) Apportionment: Unless exempt, every Assessor’s Parcel in the city shall be subject to the tax at the same rate. [TBD: CONFIRM WHETHER THE CITY SEEKS TO ONLY CHARGE DEVELOPED PARCELS]
SECTION 3.56.060 EXEMPTIONS
(1) The following parcels shall be exempt from the tax provided by this chapter. (a) Assessor’s Parcels which are owned by, encumbered by or restricted in use by the State of California, Federal or other local governments, including school districts, water districts, the City of Glendora and other government agencies; and (b) Assessor’s Parcels which are exempted from property taxes by law. (2) [The City Council may from time to time by Council resolution adopt exemptions to the tax measures set further herein to the extent such exemptions are consistent with applicable law. The City Council may provide for a method of claiming certain exemptions.
Examples of possible exemptions may include seniors, low-income housing, places of worship, and _____________][CITY TO CONFIRM WHETHER TO EXEMPT THESE AND OTHERS]
SECTION 3.56.070 COLLECTION
Pursuant to Government Code section 53087.4, any Special Parcel Tax authorized under this chapter shall be collected by the tax collector of the County. The tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the
ATTAHCMENT I
4 same penalties and the same procedure, sale, and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes. However, the city may collect the Special Parcel Tax at different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations.
Any charges made by such tax collector shall be paid out of funds deducted from the gross proceeds of the tax.
SECTION 3.56.080 INCREASE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIIB, the appropriations limit for the city of Glendora will be increased by the aggregate sum collected by levy of this Special Parcel Tax in each of the years covered by this chapter.
SECTION 3.56.090 FUNDING AND EXPENDING PROCEEDS
Proceeds of the Special Parcel Tax levied under this chapter shall be deposited into a special fund dedicated to the Improvements for the City Facilities. Eligible costs include (a) financing, planning, engineering, and legal fees incurred with respect to the Improvements for the City Facilities, (b) costs related to preparation of the Ordinance enacting this chapter and the election of the Special Parcel Tax, (c) costs of the Improvements to the City Facilities, and (d) costs of administering this Ordinance and the Special Parcel Tax provided for herein. [TBD – WHETHER TO INCLUDE OPERATING COSTS]
SECTION 3.56.100 SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions this chapter are declared to be severable.
SECTION 3.56.110 DURATION, AMENDMENT OR REPEAL
The City shall levy the Special Parcel Tax for a period of forty (40) years. The Special Parcel Tax shall expire on June 30, ____. a tax under this chapter shall expire with the fiscal year ____ending June 30,____. The City may enter into obligations for the purposes of financing the Improvements to the City Facilities for a period not to exceed the term.
Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9217, the City Council shall have and retain the right and authority to amend provisions of this chapter to in any manner that does not increase the Maximum Special Parcel Tax, or otherwise constitute a tax increase for which voter approval is required by Article XIII C of the California Constitution.
ATTAHCMENT I
5 SECTION 3.56.120 ACCOUNTABILITY
The following accountability requirements shall apply to the Special Parcel Tax:
(i) The proceeds from the Special Parcel Tax shall be used only for the purposes specified in this chapter.
(ii) The proceeds from the tax shall only be spent on projects and programs that serve the jurisdiction of the City.
(iii) [The City shall conduct an annual, independent performance audit to ensure that the tax funds are expended pursuant to the purposes specified in clause (i) and (ii).] (iv) [The City shall appoint a citizens' oversight committee to ensure that the tax is expended only for the purposes described in the measure approved by the voters.
Members appointed to the oversight committee shall receive educational training about taxes and fiscal oversight.]
(v) A separate account shall be created and held by the City, into which the proceeds of the tax shall be deposited and applied solely for the purpose of financing the Improvements.
(vi) The City's Director of Finance shall file a report with the City Council at least annually showing the amount of tax collected and expended, and the status of the Improvements.
SECTION 3.56.110 APPEALS
Any property owner claiming that the amount or application of the taxes levied hereunder are not correct may file a written notice of appeal with the City not later than twelve months after having paid the first installment of the tax that is disputed. The Finance Director shall promptly review the appeal, and if necessary, meet with the property owner, consider written and oral evidence regarding the amount of the tax, and rule on the appeal. If the Finance Director’s decision requires that the tax for an Assessor’s Parcel be modified or changed in favor of the property owner, a cash refund shall not be made, but an adjustment shall be made to the Special Parcel Tax on that Assessor’s Parcel in the subsequent Fiscal Year(s). The Finance Director at his/her discretion may also consider refunding the amount or alternate methods of crediting the change in favor of the property owner.
SECTION 3.56.120 INTERPRETATION
Interpretations may be made by the Council by ordinance or resolution for purposes of 01240.0002 2004979.5
clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this chapter. This chapter shall be interpreted liberally to effect the purposes hereof.”
SECTION 3 APPROVAL
This Ordinance shall require passage by a 4/5ths vote of the City Council in compliance with the provisions of Section 53724(b) of the California Government Code, and shall be posted at City Hall after its second reading by the City Council for at least 30 days, and shall not become effective unless approved by a two-thirds majority of the voters voting on the measure at an election to be held on _______.
SECTION 4 SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
The provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared severable.
SECTION 5. CEQA
Placing the tax measure on the ballot is a fiscal and administrative activity that is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and (b)(5) because it involves fiscal and administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect changes to the environment.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ___ day of __________ 2025.
By:
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
7 01240.0002 2004979.5
CERTIFICATION
I, Kathleen R. Sessman, City Clerk of the City of Glendora, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced for first reading on the _____ day of ______, 2025. Thereafter, said Ordinance was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _____ day of ______, 2025, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I further certify that said Ordinance was published as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Glendora, California on the _____ day of ______, 2025.
Dated:
KATHLEEN R. SESSMAN
City Clerk/Communications Director
6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
(OHFWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&DOLIRUQLD2IILFLDO6WDWHZLGH9RWHU5HJLVWUDWLRQ6\VWHP 9RWH&DO
/RV$QJHOHV
5HSRUWRI5HJLVWUDWLRQ&RXQW\6XPPDU\
5HSRUW)LOWHU
V
&RXQW\
/RV$QJHOHV
525'DWH
5HJLVWHUHG
9RWHUV 'HPRFUDWLF 5HSXEOLFDQ
$PHULFDQ
,QGHSHQGHQW *UHHQ /LEHUWDULDQ
3HDFHDQG
)UHHGRP 8QNQRZQ 2WKHU
1R3DUW\
3UHIHUHQFH
&RXQW\6XSHUYLVRULDO
&RXQW\6XSHUYLVRULDO
&RXQW\6XSHUYLVRULDO
&RXQW\6XSHUYLVRULDO
&RXQW\6XSHUYLVRULDO
7RWDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO 86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
/DVW5HIUHVK'DWH
30 3DJHRI
6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
(OHFWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&DOLIRUQLD2IILFLDO6WDWHZLGH9RWHU5HJLVWUDWLRQ6\VWHP 9RWH&DO
/RV$QJHOHV
5HJLVWHUHG
9RWHUV 'HPRFUDWLF 5HSXEOLFDQ
$PHULFDQ
,QGHSHQGHQW *UHHQ /LEHUWDULDQ
3HDFHDQG
)UHHGRP 8QNQRZQ 2WKHU
1R3DUW\
3UHIHUHQFH
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
86&RQJUHVVLRQDO
7RWDO
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
6WDWH6HQDWH
7RWDO
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
/DVW5HIUHVK'DWH
30 3DJHRI
6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
(OHFWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&DOLIRUQLD2IILFLDO6WDWHZLGH9RWHU5HJLVWUDWLRQ6\VWHP 9RWH&DO
/RV$QJHOHV
5HJLVWHUHG
9RWHUV 'HPRFUDWLF 5HSXEOLFDQ
$PHULFDQ
,QGHSHQGHQW *UHHQ /LEHUWDULDQ
3HDFHDQG
)UHHGRP 8QNQRZQ 2WKHU
1R3DUW\
3UHIHUHQFH
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\ 6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
6WDWH$VVHPEO\
7RWDO
6WDWH%RDUGRI(TXDOL]DWLRQ
7RWDO
$JRXUD+LOOV
$OKDPEUD
$UFDGLD
$UWHVLD
$YDORQ
$]XVD
%DOGZLQ3DUN
%HOO %HOO*DUGHQV
%HOOIORZHU
%HYHUO\+LOOV
%UDGEXU\
/DVW5HIUHVK'DWH
30 3DJHRI
6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
(OHFWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&DOLIRUQLD2IILFLDO6WDWHZLGH9RWHU5HJLVWUDWLRQ6\VWHP 9RWH&DO
/RV$QJHOHV
5HJLVWHUHG
9RWHUV 'HPRFUDWLF 5HSXEOLFDQ
$PHULFDQ
,QGHSHQGHQW *UHHQ /LEHUWDULDQ
3HDFHDQG
)UHHGRP 8QNQRZQ 2WKHU
1R3DUW\
3UHIHUHQFH
%XUEDQN
&DODEDVDV
&DUVRQ
&HUULWRV
&ODUHPRQW
&RPPHUFH
&RPSWRQ
&RYLQD
&XGDK\
&XOYHU&LW\
'LDPRQG%DU
'RZQH\
'XDUWH (O0RQWH
(O6HJXQGR
*DUGHQD
*OHQGDOH
*OHQGRUD
+DZDLLDQ*DUGHQV
+DZWKRUQH
+HUPRVD%HDFK
+LGGHQ+LOOV +XQWLQJWRQ3DUN
,QGXVWU\ ,QJOHZRRG ,UZLQGDOH
/D&DQDGD)OLQWULGJH
/D+DEUD+HLJKWV
/DVW5HIUHVK'DWH
30 3DJHRI
6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
(OHFWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&DOLIRUQLD2IILFLDO6WDWHZLGH9RWHU5HJLVWUDWLRQ6\VWHP 9RWH&DO
/RV$QJHOHV
5HJLVWHUHG
9RWHUV 'HPRFUDWLF 5HSXEOLFDQ
$PHULFDQ
,QGHSHQGHQW *UHHQ /LEHUWDULDQ
3HDFHDQG
)UHHGRP 8QNQRZQ 2WKHU
1R3DUW\
3UHIHUHQFH
/D0LUDGD
/D3XHQWH
/D9HUQH
/DNHZRRG
/DQFDVWHU
/DZQGDOH
/RPLWD
/RQJ%HDFK
/RV$QJHOHV
/\QZRRG
0DOLEX 0DQKDWWDQ%HDFK 0D\ZRRG
0RQURYLD
0RQWHEHOOR
0RQWHUH\3DUN
1RUZDON
3DOPGDOH
3DORV9HUGHV(VWDWHV
3DUDPRXQW
3DVDGHQD
3LFR5LYHUD
3RPRQD
5DQFKR3DORV9HUGHV
5HGRQGR%HDFK
5ROOLQJ+LOOV
5ROOLQJ+LOOV(VWDWHV
5RVHPHDG
/DVW5HIUHVK'DWH
30 3DJHRI
6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
(OHFWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&DOLIRUQLD2IILFLDO6WDWHZLGH9RWHU5HJLVWUDWLRQ6\VWHP 9RWH&DO
/RV$QJHOHV
5HJLVWHUHG
9RWHUV 'HPRFUDWLF 5HSXEOLFDQ
$PHULFDQ
,QGHSHQGHQW *UHHQ /LEHUWDULDQ
3HDFHDQG
)UHHGRP 8QNQRZQ 2WKHU
1R3DUW\
3UHIHUHQFH
6DQ'LPDV
6DQ)HUQDQGR
6DQ*DEULHO
6DQ0DULQR
6DQWD&ODULWD
6DQWD)H6SULQJV
6DQWD0RQLFD
6LHUUD0DGUH 6LJQDO+LOO
6RXWK(O0RQWH
6RXWK*DWH
6RXWK3DVDGHQD
7HPSOH&LW\
7RUUDQFH
9HUQRQ :DOQXW
:HVW&RYLQD
:HVW+ROO\ZRRG
:HVWODNH9LOODJH
:KLWWLHU
8QLQFRUSRUDWHG$UHD
7RWDO
/DVW5HIUHVK'DWH
30 3DJHRI
County Ballot
Initiative
Frequently Asked
Questions
Initiating and Submitting an Initiative
Initiating an initiative in Los Angeles County involves drafting a proposed law or changes to law and creating
a petition outlining the specifics. Initiative proponents can start the process by submitting to the
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (RR/CC) the written
text of the proposed law, a Notice of Intention (NOI) to circulate a petition in the County, along with a request for ballot title and summary (to be prepared by County
Counsel). This would start the initiative process which involves preparation of the ballot title and summary,
publication of the NOI and ballot title and summary,
and filing of the Proof of Publication before the
initiative petition can be circulated in the County for the gathering of signatures. Once the petition is ready for circulation and the circulation period commences,
proponents have 180 days to secure a sufficient number
of signatures on the petition and file the petition with the RR/CC to qualify the initiative measure for the
ballot. The petition must meet the legal requirements
set by the California Elections Code and California Code of Regulations.
How do I start an initiative in Los
Angeles County?
The key steps to submitting an initiative petition
include: (1) Proponents' filing of an NOI with the
written text of the proposed law and request for ballot title and summary with the RR/CC; (2) The preparation
of the ballot title and summary by County Counsel
following RR/CC's review and acceptance for filing of
the documents submitted by proponents; (3)
Publication of NOI and ballot title and summary by
proponents; (4) Filing of Proof of Publication by
proponents; and (5) If requested by proponents,
review and finalizing of the petition format between
RR/CC and proponents. Once the petition is deemed
ready for circulation and all the legal requirements are met, the proponents have 180 days to circulate the
petition for signatures by the registered voters in the County and file the petition with the RR/CC.
If the number of signatures on the petition submitted
to the RR/CCC equals or exceeds the minimum
number of signatures required, RR/CC will examine
and verify the signatures on the petition within 30
business days. The minimum number of signatures
required to qualify a County initiative measure for the ballot is a number equal to not less than 10% of all
votes cast in the County for all candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election preceding the
publication of the NOI.
What are the steps to submitting an
initiative petition?
An initiative petition should have a clear, concise, and legally compliant statement of the proposed law. It
requires the inclusion of a ballot title and a summary
prepared by County Counsel and the precise text of the
proposed initiative measure.
What are the key elements needed
in an initiative petition?
Circulation of Petitions
Pursuant to the California Elections Code, the process of circulating petitions to gather signatures is open to persons who are 18 years of age or older. Typically, any registered voter can participate in the circulation of a petition.
Who can circulate petitions for
signatures?
No, each voter is allowed to sign the initiative petition only once.
BͨÅͨÅæÝͥHŸÝaͨͶđͥWđÅ®~aͨÅæÝ
DͶaÐÅ®~aͨÅæÝ
The RR/CC verifies each signature submitted on the petition against the voter's signature(s) and other information in the voter's registration records. This process involves checking the eligibility and registration status of each signer.
How are petition signatures
verified?
An initiative petition must contain a certain number of valid signatures to qualify the initiative measure for the ballot. If the initiative petition falls short of the required number, it cannot qualify for the ballot.
What happens if the required
number of signatures is not met?
Signatures can be invalidated for various reasons,
including, but not limited to, being ineligible, not
registered to vote in the relevant district, the residence address on the petition differs from the voter’s registration record, or the signature on the petition does not match the signature(s) on the voter’s registration record.
What factors might cause a
signature to be invalid?
Any invalidated signatures during the verification
process are not counted toward the required number of
valid signatures. If too many signatures are invalidated, the initiative might fail to qualify.
What happens if a signature is
found to be invalid during the
verification process?
The number of signatures required
to qualify a County initiative
measure for the ballot is the
number not less than 10% of all
votes cast in the County for all
candidates for Governor at the last
gubernatorial election preceding
the publication of the NOI. Note
that the minimum signature
threshold varies depending on the
type of initiative at issue (e.g., state
initiative, district initiative), and
different statutory requirements
How many signatures
are needed for an
initiative to qualify?
What determines if
an initiative qualifies?
An initiative qualifies for the ballot
when the initiative petition
successfully garners the required
number of valid signatures within
the statutorily prescribed period.
Additionally, the proposed
initiative must conform to all legal
prerequisites and criteria to be
eligible for the ballot.
Can an initiative be
withdrawn after
submission?
Yes, an initiative proponent can
withdraw an initiative at any
time before the 88th day before
the election.
Every sheet of the petition requires a declaration by the circulator affirming that the signatures were collected while the circulator was present.
What are the requirements for
gathering signatures?
Yes, initiative petitions have a specific timeframe within which signatures must be gathered. Once the petition is deemed ready for circulation and all the legal requirements are met, the proponents have 180 days to circulate the
petition for signatures by the registered voters in the County and file the petition with the RR/CC. It is essential to ensure that all signatures are collected and filed with the RR/CC at one time within the designated period.
Is there a deadline for gathering
signatures?
Can someone sign the petition
more than once?
apply. Depending on the type of
initiative, the number of required
signatures can be based on the
percentage of voters who voted in
an election or the percentage of
voters in the jurisdiction affected
by the proposed initiative.
1 Placing a City Initiative
on the Ballot
INITIATIVE
City Clerk’s Office
[email protected]
City of Glendora
CITYOFGLENDORA
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 TABLE
OF CONTENTS
1 Preface Sample Timelines
2 Steps and Timelines View Timetable Flowchart
3 Understanding the Process Word Count Guidelines
4 Municipal Initiatives 101 County Initiative Information 5 Getting Started Frequently Asked Questions
6 City Initiative Process Samples and Forms
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Preface
The initiative petition process empowers voters to propose, amend or repeal certain legislative actions like City Ordinances and the Municipal Code of the City of Glendora. A successful petition places the issue in question before a vote of the people. The rules governing the initiative process are set forth in the California Elec. Code Section 9200 et seq. (Elec. Code), as well as applicable provisions of the California Government Code.
Initiatives require considerable planning to ensure all steps are completed according to legal requirements. The general process requires completion of numerous essential tasks including:
development of the proposed ordinance, filing and posting a notice of intent to circulate a petition, preparation of petitions, gathering of petition signatures, verification of the petitions/signatures, signature count certification, and coordination and submittal of the petitions to the County for certification.
To calculate deadlines for the aforementioned tasks, proponents should select a target election date.
Proponents should also bear in mind that all required actions by the City to place the initiative on the ballot must be taken by the 88th day before the election.
The information provided in this booklet serves to provide general information only and should not be relied on as legal advice or solely relied upon in lieu of independent counsel.
The City Clerk is the local election official. The Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters serves as the county elections official.
CITY CLERK’S OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION
Kathleen R. Sessman, City Clerk/Communications Director 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, CA 91741
(626) 914-8210
[email protected]
1 cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Steps and Timelines
The process for a citizen initiative petition is outlined in the California Election Code and is the process that would need to be followed, refer to sections 9200-9226 and 9600-9610, http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/home.xhtml
Important Deadline Reminder: It is suggested that petitions be submitted a minimum of 134 days before the election to provide for processing required by State law. All requisite processing of the initiative petitions must occur no later than the 88th day before the election to appear on the ballot. This includes verification of signatures, Council action, additional publication, etc.
STEP TASKS
Step 1 Proponent Meet With The City Clerk
x Discuss the Initiative Process
x Identify an Election Date, and
x Discuss Timelines and Deadlines for Filings.
Step 2 Develop The Written Text Of The Proposed Initiative x Proponents develop the written text of the proposed initiative. x Los Angeles County recommends that the proposed initiative be created as an Ordinance, NOT a Resolution.
x Tip: It’s strongly advised for proponent(s) are encouraged to meet with an election attorney to discuss the details of the proposed measure.
Step 3 File Notice Of Intent To Circulate Initiative With The Clerk’s Office x Schedule an appointment with the Office of the City Clerk to file a Notice of Intent and other required documentation.
x Documents Required:
o Notice of Intent
o Request for preparation of a Title and Summary
o Full written text of proposed initiative
x The $200 filing fee is not required in the City of Glendora.
Step 4 City Attorney Drafts Language Of The Proposed Title and Summary (15 Days) x The City Attorney will draft the full text of the Title and Summary to be used for circulating the petitions and to go on the ballot. There are time periods within the Elections Code to bring a challenge to the Title and Summary.
Step 5 Publish Notice Of Intent To Circulate The Petition x Proponents must publish both the Notice of Intent and Title and Summary in a local newspaperprior to gathering signatures.
x Proponents must also file proof of publication with the City Clerk during regular business hours within 10 days of the publication date.
Step 6 Format of Petition
x The proponents are responsible for the preparation and printing of the petition. x The format of an initiative petition is specified by law, refer to California Elec. Code § 9203 (b) for legal format requirements.
x This guidebook summarizes the key format requirements for a petition. However, proponents are advised to refer to the most current California Elec. Code for the details of formatting a petition according to law.
2 cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210
STEP TASKS
Step 7 Circulation Of Petitions – Gathering Of Signatures (180 Days) x Proponents may begin circulating the petitions for signatures after publication/posting of the title and summary.
x Petition must be submitted within 180 days from the date of receipt of the Title and Summary
Step 8 Submission Of Petitions To The City Clerk – Prima Facie Count x Proponents must file signatures with the City Clerk for a prima facie count. x Signatures can be submitted no later than 180 days from the date the proponents received the Title and Summary.
Step 8 County Verification (30 business days)
x The Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters verifies each signature.
Step 9 Petition Certification and City Council Action (14 Days) x The City Council exercises one of three options if sufficient signatures are verified:
1. Adopt the ordinance, without alteration, within 10 days of petition certification
2. Immediately order an election
3. Order a report pursuant to Elec. Code Section 9212. When the report is presented to the City Council, the Council must either adopt the ordinance within 10 days, or order an election.
Step 10 Coordination Of Other Required Election Activities Call of Election, Legal and Financial Analysis, Post notice of the election & deadlines for arguments and rebuttals, Receipt and selection of arguments, Receipt of rebuttals, etc..
Step 11 Submission Of Required Elections Documents To Los Angeles County Registrar Of Voters Step 12 Election Day
Step 13 Ordinance Implementation
If the initiative receives the required number of votes, it becomes law 10 days after the election results are certified. Conflicting measures adopted simultaneously will default to the measure with the highest affirmative vote count.
*Please note that this fact sheet is intended to be advisory only. The Elections Division strongly recommends that proponents consult with an attorney on the initiative process including technical requirements for the format of initiative petitions. The Division’s receipt of an initiative petition is not an indication that the petition meets all legal requirements.
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210
Understanding the Process
An initiative is a proposal to establish a new city law or amend an existing one. To qualify, proponents must gather the required number of voter signatures. Once qualified, the proposal is either considered by the City Council or placed on the ballot for a public vote.
Key Steps in the Initiative Process:
x Filing the Notice of Intention and Statement of Reasons x Receiving the Ballot Title and Summary
x Publishing the Notice of Intention, Ballot Title, and Summary x Collecting Voter Signatures
x Submitting the Petition for Verification
x City Council Action to either adopt the measure or place it on the ballot This guide is intended to help Glendora residents understand and navigate the initiative petition process. It provides an overview of key steps and requirements but does not serve as a legal document. Proponents are solely responsible for preparing and printing petitions that comply with legal standards. While this guide outlines formatting requirements, users should consult the most current version of the California Elec. Code for complete legal details and any recent updates. [Elec. Code § 9203(b)]
It is highly recommended that proponents seek advice from an election attorney to effectively manage the complexities of the process.
Please note: This guide is distributed with the understanding that the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Glendora is not providing legal advice. It should not be used as a substitute for legal counsel. Proponents are responsible for ensuring they have the most current information, including any changes in laws or procedures that may occur after this guide’s publication.
3 cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Municipal Initiative 101
Types of Petitions in the City of Glendora
The Glendora residents have three main petition tools to participate in the legislative process and hold elected officials accountable:
x Municipal Initiative
A municipal initiative allows residents to propose a new city ordinance. To begin the process, an initiative petition must be signed by a specified number of registered voters, as outlined in the California Elec. Code (§ 9201), and filed with the Glendora City Clerk. Once submitted, the City Council may either adopt the ordinance or place it on the ballot for voter consideration. x Municipal Referendum
A municipal referendum gives voters the power to challenge and potentially overturn an ordinance passed by the City Council. To qualify, a referendum petition must be filed with the City Clerk within 30 days after the ordinance’s adoption and before it becomes effective. x Municipal Recall
A municipal recall petition allows voters to remove an elected city official from office before the end of their term. This process, authorized by the California Constitution since 1911, reflects the public’s right to hold officials accountable. Recall petitions must be filed with the City Clerk and follow procedures established in state law.
Who to Contact
x City of Glendora Petitions (Initiative, Referendum, Recall):
The City Clerk serves as the official contact for all local petition matters and oversees the circulation and filing process.
x Countywide Initiative Petitions:
For petitions affecting county-level issues, contact the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters.
More information is available at lavote.gov.
How Long Does the Petition Process Take?
x The process begins when the Notice of Intention is filed with the City Clerk. x The Los Angeles County Registrar recommends that petitions be submitted at least 134 days before an election to allow enough time for required steps such as signature verification, public notice, and City Council action.
x All necessary steps must be completed no later than the 88th day prior to the election for the measure to appear on the ballot.
x A sample timeline is available to provide a general overview of how long the process may take.
Please note that timelines can vary depending on the specifics of each petition effort. ݝݜݛݚ Sample Timeline
4 cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 When to File
Signatures shall be secured and the petition shall be presented to the Registrar of Voters office for filing within 180 days from the date of receipt of the title and summary, or after termination of any action for a writ of mandate and, if applicable, after receipt of an amended title or summary or both, whichever occurs later. (EC 9110)
Filing Procedure
The petition must be filed by the proponents, or by any person or persons authorized in writing by the proponents. All sections of the petition must be filed in at one time. Any sections of the petition not filed, will be voided for all purposes. Once filed, no petition section can be amended except by court order.
After the petition is filed, the Elections Official determines the total number of signatures on the petition.
This is called the “Raw Count.” If it is determined that the number of signatures equals or is in excess of the minimum number of signatures required, the petition will be examined. However, if it is determined that the number of signatures does not equal or exceed the minimum number of signatures required, no further action will be taken. (EC 9113)
Who Are the Proponents of the Petition?
The proponents, or sponsors, of a petition are a committee of five registered voters of the City of Glendora. Their full names and addresses must appear on the petition.
How Are Petition Signatures Verified?
Signatures are verified by comparing those on the petition with voter signatures on file with the Los Angeles County Registrar/Recorder. Verification continues until:
x A sufficient number of valid signatures is confirmed, or x The petition is deemed insufficient.
Under Elec. Code § 9030(d), election officials may use a random sampling method to verify a portion of the signatures, instead of checking everyone.
Signature Requirements
In order to qualify for adoption or submittal to the voters of the proposed measure, the proponents must obtain signatures of 10% of the voters of the City according of the last report of registration by the Los Angeles County Elections Official to the Secretary of State, pursuant to Elec. Code § 2187, effective at the time the notice specified in Elec. Code § 9202 was published. [Elec. Code § 9215]
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Getting Started
How to Initiate a City Ballot Measure
x You begin the city initiative process by filing with the Glendora City Clerk a Notice of Intention to circulate an initiative petition. x The Notice of Intent must include the names and business or residence addresses of at least one but not more than five proponents of the petition and may include a printed statement, not exceeding 500 words in length, stating the reasons for the proposed petition. The City Clerk will verify the word count at the time you submit your Notice of Intent.
x Following verification, the City Clerk will forward Notice of Intent, proposed initiative, and the request to prepare a title and summary to City Attorney for action.
How to Prepare to File Notice of Intention!
x Determine if the issue is an allowable topic for a city initiative. x The Glendora City Clerk can provide you with helpful information to assist you in understanding the steps necessary to initiate, circulate, and file City initiative petitions.
x Consult with an election attorney for guidance and assistance. It is incumbent upon proponents to follow the petition process as directed in the Elec. Code. x Proponent(s) should seek assistance in drafting the text of the proposed law. o Private counsel;
o Write the text themselves; or
o Obtain assistance from the Office of Legislative Counsel or the City Attorney in drafting the language of the proposed law. Proponent(s) must submit a written request signed by 25 or more electors. If the Legislative Counsel determines that there is a reasonable probability the proposed initiative measure will eventually be submitted to the voters, the Legislative Counsel will draft the proposed law. (Government Code § 10243)
x Become familiar with the process by reading this handbook, Elec. Code Sections 9200 through 9226, and call the Glendora City Clerk at (626) 914-8210, if you have specific questions.
x Draft the following documents:
a. Notice of Intent
5 cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Notices of Intent should be in substantially the following form:
ݝݜݛݚDirect Link: Notice of Intention Sample
b. Write text of the measure (Ordinance format recommended by LA County). x 1st Step: The first step in the process of qualifying an initiative measure is to write the text of the proposed law.
Proponent(s) may:
1. Seek the assistance of their own private counsel to help draft the text of the proposed law, or
2. They may choose to write the text themselves, or
3. The proposed initiative measure’s proponent(s) may also obtain assistance from the Office of Legislative Counsel in drafting the language of the proposed law. Proponent(s) must submit a written request signed by 25 or more electors. If the Legislative Counsel determines that there is a reasonable probability the proposed initiative measure will eventually be submitted to the voters, the Legislative Counsel will draft the proposed law. (Government Code § 10243)
c. Statement of the Purpose of the Measure:
x Optional but recommended.
x Cannot exceed 500 words.
ݝݜݛݚ Direct Link: Word Count Guidelines
d. Written request for a Ballot Title and Summary
e. Proponents’ names and address (Election Code §9202)
f. $200 filing fee (Glendora does not require)
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the persons whose names appear hereon of their intention to circulate the petition within the City of Glendora for the purpose of qualifying for the ballot an initiative measure entitled [insert title] for the [insert desired election date] ballot.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows: [insert a 500-word maximum statement outlining the reasons for the proposed petition. The statement is optional. The notice shall contain the printed name, signature, and business or residence address of at least one, but not more than five, proponents. §9104]
NOTE: There is no established fee in the City of Glendora for submitting a Notice of Intention to circulate a City Initiative.
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 What is Required at the Time the Notice of Intention is filed:
1st. Notice of Intention that is signed by at least one (1), but not more than three (3) proponents. Elec. Code §9202(a)
2nd. The written text of the initiative (may include a written statement of 500 words or less, stating the reasons for the proposed petition). Elec. Code §9202(a) 3rd. A written request for a Ballot Title and Summary to be prepared. This request must include one of the proponents’ name and address. Elec. Code §9203 4th. An executed and signed Statement of Acknowledgement that it’s a misdemeanor under state law to knowingly or willfully allow the signatures on an initiative petition to be used for any purpose other than qualification of the proposed measure for the ballot. Elec. Code §9608
ݝݜݛݚ Direct Link: Proponents Statement of Acknowledgement
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 City Initiative Process
A City initiative, also known as an ordinance initiative petition, allows citizens to propose a new law for a vote by the registered voters of Glendora.
Ballot initiatives give voters the power to directly shape government actions by expressing the majority will.
HIGH-LEVEL OVERVIEW OF INITIATIVE PROCESS:
INITIATIVE TIMELINES
ݝݜݛݚ Direct Link: Sample Timelines ݝݜݛݚ Direct Link: Timeline E- Dates Only
6 cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210
STEP BY STEP OF INITIATIVE PROCESS
Filing of Notice of Intent
Proponents must file an official notice of intent to circulate a petition. The notice of intent must be accompanied by the written text of the initiative and may include a written statement of 500 words or less, stating the reasons for the proposed petition. The notice shall be signed by at least one (1), but not more than three (3), proponents. [Elec. Code §9202 (a)] Notices of intent should be in substantially the following form:
Any person filing a notice of intent with the City Clerk shall pay a filing fee to be established by the legislative body not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200) to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the City Clerk certifies the sufficiency of the petition. [Election Code § 9202 (b)]. The $200 filing fee is not required in the City of Glendora.
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the persons whose names appear hereon of their intention to circulate the petition within the City of Glendora for the purpose of qualifying for the ballot an initiative measure entitled [insert title] for the [insert desired election date] ballot.
A statement of the reasons of the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows: [insert a 500- word maximum statement outlining the reasons for the proposed petition. The statement is optional. The notice shall contain the printed name, signature, and business or residence address of at least one, but not more than five, proponents. §9104]
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Ballot Title and Summary
Any person who is interested in any proposed measure shall file a copy of the proposed measure with the City Clerk with a request that a ballot title and summary be prepared.
The request shall be accompanied by the address of the person proposing the measure. The City Clerk shall immediately transmit a copy of the proposed measure to the City Attorney. Within 15 days after the proposed measure is filed, the City Attorney shall provide and return the City Clerk a ballot title for the summary of the proposed measure. [Elec. Code § 9203(a)]
The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of the ballot title and summary to the person filing the proposed measure. [Elec. Code § 9203(b)]
Outline of Exact Process:
܆ Immediately upon the request from the proponent to prepare a Ballot Title and Summary, the City Clerk will transmit a copy of the proposed measure to the City Attorney.
܆ Within 15 days after the proposed measure is filed, City Attorney will provide the Ballot Title and Summary to the City Clerk.
܆ The Ballot Title may differ from any other title of the proposed measure and shall express in 500 words or less the purpose of the measure. ܆ In providing the Ballot Title, City Attorney shall give a true and impartial statement of the purpose of the proposed measure in such language that the Ballot Title shall neither be an argument, nor be likely to create prejudice, for or against the proposed measure.
܆ The City Clerk will furnish a copy of the Ballot Title and Summary to the proponent(s).
܆ Any elector of the City may seek a writ of mandate requiring the Ballot Title or Summary prepared by the City Attorney to be amended. The Court shall expedite hearing on the writ. A peremptory writ of mandate shall be issued only upon clear and convincing proof that the Ballot Title or Summary is false, misleading, or inconsistent with the requirements of Elec. Code § 9204.
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Format of Petition
Proponents are responsible for the preparation and printing of the petition. The format of an initiative petition is specified by law. This guidebook summarizes the format requirements for a petition. However, proponents are advised to refer to the most current California Elec. Code for the details of formatting a petition according to law and/or to consult an elections attorney.
Elections Officials required by law to receive or file in their offices any initiative or referendum petition shall not receive or file any initiative or referendum petition not in conformity with this article [Election Code § 9015].
Things to Remember:
x The proponents are responsible for the preparation and printing of the petition. x The format of an initiative petition is specified by law. x Proponent(s), prior to its circulation, must place upon each section of the petition, above the text of the proposed measure and across the top of each page of the petition on which signatures are to appear, in roman boldface type not smaller than 11-point, the ballot title prepared by the City Attorney. In addition, the text of the measure shall also be printed on the Petition in type not smaller than 8-point. [Elec. Code § 9203 (b)]
This section summarizes the format requirements for a petition. However, proponents are advised to refer to the most current California Elec. Code for the details of formatting a petition according to law.
Official Top Funders Sheet [Elec. Code § 101 and 107]
For any initiative petition for which the circulation is paid for by a committee formed pursuant to Government Code 82013, an Official Top Funders disclosure shall be included on the petition or in a separate document presented to a prospective signer of the petition.
Elections officials are not required to verify the accuracy of the information or to reapprove the petition upon any updates the committee makes.
The Official Top Funders Sheet must be in 14-point black roman type on a plain, contrasting background, centered horizontally, except as described. The text shall not be condensed or have spacing between characters reduced to be narrower than a normal roman type. [Elec. Code § 107(a)(1)]
The top of the sheet shall have the text “OFFICIAL TOP FUNDERS. Valid only for”, followed by a m Government Code § 84501(c) were last confirmed. [Elec. Code §107(a)(2).] This information shall be boldface and at least 16-point type. Next, separated by a blank horizontal line, shall be the title of the initiative or referendum as it appears on the petition, in all capital letters. [Elec. Code § 107(a)(3).] cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Heading of Petition
The heading of the proposed measure must be in boldface type in substantially the following format:
Sections of the Petition
A petition may have several sections. Each petition consists of sections which are separate, identical parts of the petition. Each section must contain the full title and summary of the measure, the text and space for signatures and a circulator’s declaration.
Each section of the petition must contain:
x The circulating title and summary and the full text of the proposed initiative measure. [Elec. Code 9207].
x The ballot title and summary shall be in at least 11-point roman type, and x The full text of the proposed initiative measure shall be in at least 8-point type. x Each page on which signatures are to appear must contain a copy of the circulating title and summary and the unique identifier provided by the Elections Official
Please refer to the Elec. Code for the required specifications.
Pages of the Petition
Each section of a petition consists of two or more pages which may be printed on front and back. Each page of the petition must contain a copy of the City Attorney’s ballot title and summary printed in roman boldface type, not smaller than a 11-point font size. The ballot title and summary must be clearly separated from the text of the measure. The text of the measure must be printed in a font size not smaller than 8- point.
The heading of the proposed measure shall be in substantially the following form:
Initiative Measure to be Submitted Directly to the Voters The City Attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE DIRECTLY SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS The city attorney has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
(Here set forth the title and summary prepared by the city attorney. This title and summary must also be printed across the top of each page of the petition where signatures are to appear). cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 (Here set forth the title and summary prepared by the City Attorney. This title and summary must also be printed across the top of each page of the petition whereon signatures are to appear.) (Elec. Code § 9203 (b))
Signature Portion
The petition must have enough room for the signature of each signer as well as their printed name, residence address, and city name. Signature spaces must be numbered consecutively beginning with the number 1 and continuing through the number of signatures allotted to each section. A minimum space of one inch must be left after each name for the use of the Registrar of Voters.
The petition format shall be substantially in the following form and shall contain the notice to the public in 11-point type, prior to that portion of the petition for voter’s signatures: (Elec. Code § 101)
NOTICE TO THEPUBLIC
THIS PETITION MAY BE CIRCULATED BY A PAID SIGNATURE GATHERER OR A VOLUNTEER. SIGNERS HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK. (EC 101)
REGISTERED VOTERS ONLY
Official
Use Only
1. Print Your
Name: _________________________________________________ DO NOT SIGN UNLESS you have seen Official Top Funders sheet and its month is still valid.
Sign: __________________________________________________ Residence
Address ONLY: ____________________________________
City: _____________________________ Zip: ____________
2. Print Your
Name: _________________________________________________ DO NOT SIGN UNLESS you have seen Official Top Funders sheet and its month is still valid.
Sign: __________________________________________________ Residence
Address ONLY: ____________________________________
City: _____________________________ Zip: ____________
3. Print Your
Name: _________________________________________________ DO NOT SIGN UNLESS you have seen Official Top Funders sheet and its month is still valid.
Sign: __________________________________________________ Residence
Address ONLY: ____________________________________
City: _____________________________ Zip: ____________
4. Print Your
Name: _________________________________________________ DO NOT SIGN UNLESS you have seen Official Top Funders sheet and its month is still valid.
Sign: __________________________________________________ Residence
Address ONLY: ____________________________________
City: _____________________________ Zip: ____________
5. Print Your
Name: _________________________________________________ DO NOT SIGN UNLESS you have seen Official Top Funders sheet and its month is still valid.
Sign: __________________________________________________ Residence
Address ONLY: ____________________________________
City: _____________________________ Zip: ____________
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Publication and Filing of Publication Affidavit
The proponents must publish (at least once) the notice of intention and the title and summary of the initiative in a newspaper “of general circulation.” The City’s official paper for legal notices is San Gabriel Valley Examiner. [Elec. Code § 9205(a), 9256] If there is no adjudicated newspaper of general circulation, the notice and the title and summary shall be published at least once, in a newspaper circulated within the city and adjudicated as being of general circulation within the county in which the city is located and the notice, title, and summary shall be posted in three (3) public places within the city, which places shall be those utilized for the purpose of posting ordinances. [Elec. Code § 9205(b), 9256]
If the proponents request the City’s site for posting, they must submit a formal request for posting.
How to request City’s site for posting:
x Email the City Clerk at [email protected] x Email must be received 24 hours prior to the requested posting date (holidays & weekends excluded).
x Email must include:
1. The date proponent(s) want Notice posted.
2. A request to post notice at the City’s three (3) legal posting sites
3. The Notice of Intention and the title and summary of the proposed measure.
After Publication
After publication of the Notice of Intention and Title and Summary, the petition may be circulated. Each petition section (page) must comply with the requirements and contain a copy of the Notice of Intention, Title and Summary, and Full Text of Initiative. x Within ten (10) days after the date of publication or posting of the notice of intention and title and summary, the proponents are required to file a copy of the notice and title and summary as published or posted together with an affidavit made by a representative of the newspaper which the notice was published with the City Clerk. [Elec. Code § 9206. 9256]
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Circulation of Petition – Gathering of Signatures
Who May Circulate the Petition
A person who is a voter or who is qualified to register to vote in the county may circulate an initiative or referendum petition anywhere within the state. [Elec. Code § 102, 106 and 9021]
x Petition circulators must be 18 years of age or older.
When to Circulate the Petition
Before circulating a petition, proponent(s) must:
x Publish the Notice of Intention and the Title and Summary of the initiative at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City; and x File Proof of Publication with the Glendora City Clerk Clerk’s office; x Only after publication of the Notice of Intention and Title and Summary, the petition may be circulated.
Reminder: Each petition section (page) must comply with the requirements of Sections 100, 104, 9020 and 9105 of the Elec. Code and contain a copy of the Notice of Intention, Title and Summary, and Full Text of Initiative.
Circulators
The petition may be circulated by a number of individuals carrying separate, identical parts of the petition called sections. Each petition circulator who obtains signatures must complete the attached declaration to the petition.
Prior to allowing a person to circulate an initiative petition for signatures, the person, company official, or other organizational officer who is in charge of signature gathering shall execute and submit to the proponent(s) a signed statement that reads as follows [Elec. Code § 9609]:
This statement shall be kept on file by the proponent(s) for not less than eight months after the certification of the results of the election for which the petition qualified or, if the measure did not qualify, eight months after the deadline for submission of the petition to elections officials. [Elec. Code § 9609(b)] In addition, all paid circulators shall execute and submit to the person, company official, or other organizational officer who is in charge of signature gathering a signed statement, prior to soliciting signatures on an initiative petition, that reads as follows (Elec. Code § 9610):
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 This statement shall be kept on file by the person, company official, or other organizational officer who is in charge of signature gathering for not less than eight months after the certification of the results of the election for which the petition qualified or, if the measure did not qualify, eight months after the deadline for submission of the petition to Election Officials. Unpaid circulators do not need to provide a signed statement. [Elec. Code § 9610(b)(c)]
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Council Actions During Circulation
During the circulation of the petition, or before taking any action to either submit the initiative to the voters or enact the ordinance, the City Council may refer the initiative to any city staff for review and a report on its effect and fiscal impact. The report shall be presented to the City Council no later than 30 days after certification of the petition’s sufficiency by the elections official to the City Council. [Elec. Code § 9212] The City Council may request a report on the proposed initiative measure on any or all of the following:
1. Its fiscal impact
2. Its effect on the internal consistency of City’s general and specific plans
3. Its effect on the use of land, the impact on the availability and location of housing, and the ability of the city to meet its regional housing needs
4. Its impact on funding for infrastructure of all types
5. Its impact on the community’s ability to attract and retain business and employment
6. Its impact on the uses of vacant parcels of land
7. Its impact on agricultural lands, open space, traffic congestion, existing business districts, and developed areas designated for revitalization
8. Any other matters the council requests to be in the report The report shall be presented to the City Council within the time prescribed by the Council but no later than 30 days after the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition.
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Facial Examination – Prima Facie Count
If the city clerk determines, after a prima facia examination, that the petition does not have sufficient signatures or does not satisfy the format requirements imposed by the Elections Code, the petition is returned to the filer. If the petition is in proper form and appears to have sufficient signatures, the petition is accepted by the city clerk and turned over the Los Angeles County Registrar who conducts the signature verification to determine if the measure qualified.
To qualify an initiative, the petition must be signed by not less than 10% of the registered voters of the city, or in a city with less than 1,000 registered voters, by 25% of voters or 100 voters, whichever is less.
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Examination of Signature
Signature Verification Process
Information regarding the signature verification process can be found in California Code of Regulations section 20960 and is available on the Secretary of State’s website at: 20960. Signature Verification Process
x When verifying the signatures on a petition, the Registrar compares the signatures on the petition with those on the affidavits of registration. If the signature on the petition does not match the one on the affidavit, it is rejected. x As part of the verification process, the Registrar also determines whether the residence address on the petition is the same as the residence address on the affidavit of registration. If the addresses are different, incomplete, or missing, the signature is rejected. [Elec. Code § 105]
Within 30 working days from the date of filing, the Los Angeles County RegistrarRecorder/County Clerk shall verify the signatures thereon either from a 100% check or a random sampling.
Random Sampling
The random sampling shall include an examination of at least 500, or 3% of the signatures, whichever is greater. If the statistical sampling shows that the number of valid signatures is within 95 to 110 percent of the number of signatures of qualified voters needed to declare the petition sufficient, the County Elections Official shall, within 60 days from the date of the filing of the petition, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, examine and verify each signature filed. If the total number of valid signatures is less than 95 percent of the signatures required to qualify the initiative measure, the proposed initiative measure fails to qualify for the ballot.
The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk shall certify as to the sufficiency or insufficiency of the petition.
1. If the petition is insufficient, no action is taken.
2. If the petition is sufficient, the elections official will certify the results to the City Council at their next “regular” meeting. The signatures on a petition which has been certified are not public information. [Elec. Code § 9115] NOTE: Supplemental petitions are not permitted
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Council Action if Petition is Sufficient
If the initiative petition is signed by not less than 10% of the voters of the City according to the last report of registration by the county elections official to the Secretary of State, the City Council shall do one of the following: [Elec. Code § 9215] Option 1: Adopt the ordinance without alteration
Option 2: Submit the ordinance without alteration to the voters Option 3: Order a report pursuant to Elec. Code § 9212
When legally possible, the election may be consolidated with the next statewide election occurring not less than 88 days after the date of the order of election.
If the governing body calls a special election, the election shall be held not less than 88 days nor more than 103 days after the order of the election.
Note: The proponent(s) of an initiative may withdraw the initiative at any time before the 88th day before the election, whether or not the petition has already been found sufficient by the elections official.
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Legal and Financial Impartial Analysis
Whenever a city measure qualifies for a place on the ballot, the governing body may direct the city elections official to transmit a copy of the measure to the city attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the city attorney are affected. The city attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the measure. The analysis shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city.
If the measure affects the organization or salaries of the office of the city attorney, the governing board may direct the city elections official to prepare the impartial analysis.
The analysis shall be printed preceding the arguments for and against the measure.
The analysis shall not exceed 500 words in length.
If the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information guide, there shall be printed immediately below the impartial analysis, in no less than 10-point bold type, a legend substantially as follows:
“The above statement is an impartial analysis of Ordinance or Measure ____. If you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure, please call the elections official's office at (insert telephone number) and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.” [Elec. Code §9280]
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Arguments and Rebuttals
Direct Arguments
Direct arguments for or against measures will be submitted to the City Clerk at a date no later than 14 days from the calling of the election. Direct Arguments shall not exceed three hundred (300) words. [Elec. Code § 9282 (b, c), 9286] Rebuttal Arguments
The author or majority of the authors of an argument relating to a city measure may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument or may authorize in writing another other person or persons to prepare, submit, or sign the rebuttal argument. [Elec. Code §9285(a)(2)]
x Rebuttal arguments shall not exceed 250 words. [Elec. Code § 9285(a)(3)] x Rebuttal arguments shall not be signed by more than five (5) persons, shall be printed in the same manner as a direct argument, and shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut. [Elec. Code § 9285(a)(5)] When the arguments for and against the measure have been selected, the City Clerk shall provide a copy of the argument in favor to the author of the argument against and a copy of the argument against to the author(s) of the argument in favor. The authors may then prepare rebuttal arguments. A rebuttal argument relating to a City measure shall be filed with the City Clerk no later than 10 days after the final filing date for primary arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall not exceed two hundred and fifty (250) words. [Elec. Code § 9285]
Argument/Rebuttal Signatures
Each argument and rebuttal must be accompanied by the printed name and signature of the person(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization and the printed name and signature of at least one of its principal officers on the form provided by the City Clerk. No more than 5 signatures/names will be printed with the argument or rebuttal. [Elec. Code §9283]
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Word Count Standards
Punctuation Not Counted
Dictionary Words One
Abbreviation/Acronyms One
Geographical Names One Example: City of Glendora
Streets, Bridges One for each word
Names of Areas One for each word Example: Bay Area, East Bay Names of School Districts
and Special Districts
One
All Other Proper Names One
Telephone Numbers One
Email/Website Addresses One
Whole Numbers:
Digits
Spelled Out
One
One for each word
Dates:
Digits
Words + Digits
One
Two
Hyphenated Words in
Dictionary
One Generally available standard
dictionary published in the
United States within the last 10
years
Hyphenated Words not
Hyphenated in Dictionary
One for each part
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Public Review Periods
10-Day Public Inspection of All Materials
The Office of the City Clerk will make all materials available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office for a period of ten (10) calendar days immediately following the filing deadline for submission of all materials. Anyone may request a copy of the materials. [Elec. Code § 9295]
cityofglendora.gov/elections
GLENDORA CITY CLERK’S OFFICE | 116 E. Foothill Blvd | Glendora 91741 | 626.914.8210 Ordinance
Requirements for Ordinance to become effective
If a majority of the voters voting on a proposed ordinance vote in its favor, the ordinance will become a valid and binding ordinance of the city. The ordinance will be considered as adopted upon the date that the vote is declared by the City Council, and will go into effect 10 days after that date. [Elec. Code § 9217] Conflicting Ordinances
If the provisions of two or more ordinance adopted at the same election conflict, the ordinance receiving the highest number of affirmative votes shall control. [Elec. Code § 9221]
Repeal of Ordinance
No ordinance that is either proposed by initiative petition and adopted by the vote of the legislative body of the city without submission to the voters, or adopted by the voters, shall be repealed or amended except by a vote of the people, unless provision is otherwise made in the original ordinance. [Elec. Code § 9217] EXAMPLE Notice of Intent to Circulate – Public Infrastructure and Facilities Initiative
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CIRCULATE PETITION
Notice is hereby given by the persons whose names appear hereon of their intention to circulate the petition within the City of Glendora for the purpose of qualifying an initiative measure that will enact a bond proposition to fund public infrastructure improvements and upgrades throughout the City.
A statement of the reasons for the proposed action as contemplated in the petition is as follows:
The purpose of the proposed initiative is to authorize the issuance of bonds to finance much-needed public infrastructure projects, including but not limited to addressing structural deficiencies, upgrading and enhancing City facilities, improving parks and community centers, and expanding public spaces, services, and amenities available to Glendora residents.
The proposed measure would establish a bond indebtedness to fund critical infrastructure and facility improvements across the City. These include, but are not limited to:
x Addressing structural deficiencies;
x Improvements to City Infrastructure
x Renovations and improvements to public safety facilities and public library; x Enhancements to parks, trails and open space; and
x Modernization, renovations and improvements of other City-owned facilities.
A key feature of this measure is its commitment to expanding the range, quality, and availability of City services and facilities — not only repairing what exists, but building and expanding to meet the evolving needs of Glendora’s residents.
To ensure transparency and fiscal responsibility, the measure includes strict accountability provisions:
x Independent financial and performance audits;
x Citizen oversight through a public committee;
x A prohibition on using bond funds for City salaries, employee benefits, or operational expenses, with the exception of capped project administration costs (no more than 5% of total proceeds).
This measure was developed by [insert name of committee, organization, or individual proponents] to invest in Glendora’s future, and with the goal of securing long-term investments in Glendora’s public infrastructure and quality of life to meet current infrastructure demands, and ensure access to high-quality public spaces and services for generations to come.
[Insert Name] [Insert Name] [Insert Name]
[Insert Address] [Insert Address] [Insert Address]
[Insert City, State Zip] [Insert City, State Zip] [Insert City, State Zip] Signature Signature Signature
Date Date Date
EXAMPLE Notice of Intent to Circulate – Public Infrastructure and Facilities Initiative REMINDERS:
x The Notice of Intention must be signed by at least one but not more than five proponents of the petition. x The Notice of Intention must be accompanied by
(1) The written text of the measure;
(2) A request for a ballot title and summary to be prepared by City Counsel; and (3) A Statement of Acknowledgement
(4) Map & Legal Description of Proposal (if applicable) Before circulating a petition, file this notice and all required documents with the Glendora City Clerk at:
Glendora City Clerk, 116 E. Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, CA 91741
CITY FACILITIES UPDATE
(CONTINUATION OF MARCH 2025 CONVERSATION)
CITY COUNCILJUNE 24, 2025ADAM RAYMOND, CITY MANAGER
CITY FACILITY CAPITAL NEEDS
UPDATEOVERVIEW
REPORT OUTLINES HISTORICAL CHALLENGES FOR CITIES, GLENDORA’S DEFERRED MAINTENANCE, FUNDING GAPS, ELECTION TIMING • More than $250M required to modernize city facilities• Council is recommended to receive this update and provide direction to staff, as necessary
STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK
FOCUS AREAS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL
NEW + REVITALIZED FACILITIES
• Civic Center transformation
o Action 3.1: Develop Funding Models
o Action 3.3: Implement Space Planningo Action 3.4: New Construction / Renovation
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
DECADES OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
JULY 2002, LA TIMES ARTICLE“UPSCALE SUBURB WARNED ITS BEAUTY IS ONLY SKIN DEEP” CURRENT CHALLENGES • Over $50M invested since 2020• Modernization costs are approximately $250M o Facilities in need include Library, Police Station, Teen Center, Senior Center, Public Works Facilities, and City Hall
INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGES
STATEWIDEPOST-WWII GROWTH
→ MODERN-DAY STRAIN
1950S–70S SUBURBAN EXPANSION CREATED VAST INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORKS • Simultaneous aging
→ mass maintenance backlog
• Federal aid declined; cities struggle with outdated systems
LOCAL PRESSURES IN GLENDORA
ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REALITIES
90%+ OF HOUSING IS SINGLE-FAMILY
• Limited commercial corridors; underperforming shopping centers• Recent planning tools: Housing Element, General Plan Update, Station Area Vision
FISCALIZATION OF LAND USE POST PROP 13
• City’s prioritized sales tax generating businesses over housing• State’s housing mandates at odds with decades of zoning practices• Major shift is consumer spending online and higher end experiences
LOCAL PRESSURES IN GLENDORA
LOCAL PRESSURES IN GLENDORA
POPULATION SNAPSHOT
SLOWING/REVERSAL OF GROWTH, BUT INFRASTRUCTURE STILL AGING • 1911 (700)
– City of Glendora is incorporated
• 1950 (3,988)• 1960 (20,752)• 1970 (31,380)
– In the late 1960’s the City publishes its General
Plan for year 1990 and anticipates a population of 80,000 and student enrollment growing from approximately 9,000 students to 25,000 students. • 1980 (38,500)• 2000 (49,502)•Present (51,209)
– This is a reduction from a peak of 52,506 in
2020.
470%
39 years
1,141%
50 years
3%
25 years
THE COST OF UNDERINVESTMENT
STRUCTURAL FAILURES IN CITY BUILDINGS
A SAMPLE LIST INCLUDES:
• Library: Failing torsional load on beams, failure of support columns• La Fetra Center: Condemned stairwell• City Hall: New roof and foundation
FUNDING LIMITATIONS
STATE & FEDERAL SUPPORT INADEQUATE
CITIES SPEND 7X-9X MORE THAN THE FEDS ON INFRASTRUCTURE • Glendora lacks CFD’s, sufficient development impact fees, or water capacity charges
• Proposition 13 limits City’s ability to raise property tax-based revenue o Police Station and Library both built through increased in property tax GLENDORA’S GENERATIONAL
INVESTMENTCITY HAS MADE SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS, BUT THEY ARE NOT ENOUGH • 2020-2024: $50M invested• 2025-2030: 76 projects planned, totaling $108M• Funded through Measures E/Z, Grants ($60M+), Water Assessment, Federal and Local funds
• Notable investments include Finkbiner Park, Louie Pompei Park, Bennett Ave Water Project, Bender/Carter Project, School Site Intersections, and Library Structural Analysis
COST ESCALATION TRENDS
SHARE RISE IN PROJECT EXPENSES
CPI VS CONSTRUCTION CPI
• Construction cost indices have
increased about 22–25x since 1950
• General CPI has risen around 12x
since 1950
• This divergence is very
impactful initial growth vs replacement/rehab
COST ESCALATION TRENDS
SHARE RISE IN PROJECT EXPENSES
SLURRY SEAL: $2.00
→ $3.30/SQ YD (60%+ INCREASE SINCE 2020)
COST ESCALATION TRENDS
SHARE RISE IN PROJECT EXPENSES
2.5” GRIND & OVERLAY: $2.10
→
$5.00/SQ FT (OVER 100% INCREASE SINCE 2020)
COST ESCALATION TRENDS
SHARE RISE IN PROJECT EXPENSES
WATERMAIN REPLACEMENTS: $200
→ $265/FT (UP 30%+ SINCE 2020)
• Benefits of combining water and
street projects saves an estimated $65/FT or 30%
ELECTION-BASED FUNDING
STRATEGIESREVENUE MEASURE FRAMEWORK
TWO PATHS: REVENUE MEASURE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE
• City Council-Initiated: Requires 2/3 vote• Citizen-Led Initiative: Simple majority (50%+1)• August 2024 survey: 53% support for citywide bond / parcel tax, 45% for Library-only
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND VS
PARCEL TAX – KEY DIFFERENCES
FEATURE GO BOND TAX MEASUR
E PARCEL TAX MEASURE
Purpose / Use of Funds
Capital improvements only (e.g., buildings, roads, parks) Capital projects (e.g. buildings, roads, parks) and operating expenses (e.g., maintenance) Funding Mechanism Bonds issued and repaid over time Tax revenue collected directly from parcelsTax Type Ad valorem tax based on assessed property value, square footage, parcel type, etc. Typically, a flat rate or tiered formula per parcel. Who Pays Property owners based on tax type All parcel owners, regardless of value. exceptions to the tax can include those that meet certain income requirements, seniors, etc.
Voter Approval Threshold
2/3 majority for cities (55% for school bonds under Prop 39).Possibility of (50%+1) on a citizen initiative. 2/3 majority under Prop 13 for City Council approved ballot measure 50%+1 for citizen initiative.
Flexibility of Use Restricted to voter-approved infrastructure projects. Flexible: Can fund capital projects, programs, maintenance, services, and debt.Debt Involvement Yes – city takes on debt and repays it over time. Proceeds may be pledged to a lease financing or an installment sale financing, associated with a revenue bond or a certificate of participations. Duration / Term Typically, 15–40 years Can be temporary (e.g., 10 to 40 years) or ongoing Security / Backing Backed by ad valorem tax levied every year; legally obligated to repay
Optional; funds collected annually
CITIZEN INITIATIVE PROCESS
TIMELINE & REQUIREMENTS
12-TO-18-MONTH PROCESS
• 3,600 signatures required (10% of voters)• Final deadline: 88 days before election• Full guide available from City Clerk
FUTURE OUTLOOK
CONTINUING COMMUNITY CONVERSATION
FACILITY MODERNIZATION IS ESSENTIAL FOR QUALITY SERVICE • Past generations funded public safety & library via bonds • We continue to plan for the future with civic center plans forthcoming, and Public Work’s Yard plans underway
• Today’s leaders must consider similar community investments for future generations of Glendorans
o City has effectively spent existing resourceso Significant successes with grant/appropriation awards o Continue to make generational investments
DESPITE THESE EFFORTS, WE ARE STILL FALLING BEHIND
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the City Council:
1. Receive a report on capital needs of
City facilities, options to fund those needs, and election timelines; and
2. Provide direction to staff, as
necessary.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: September 9, 2025
FROM: City Manager DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Civic Center Update
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Receive a report on civic center renderings and cost estimates; and,
2. Provide direction to staff.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
New + Revitalized Facilities
Action 3.1 City Council directs funding methodology on new or revitalized civic center Action 3.3 Complete space planning assessment in coordination with citywide facility assessment Action 3.4 Determine if the Civic Center should be a remodel or new build
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Over the past five years, Glendora has invested more than $50 million in parks, streets, and water infrastructure.
Despite these efforts, many core facilities—including the Library, Police Station, Teen Center, Senior Center, City Hall, Transportation Center, and Public Works Yard—require modernization. Deferred maintenance is estimated at $50 million, with more than $250 million needed to create modern, accessible workspaces for staff and community spaces for the public in all City facilities.
Community surveys show general support for a citywide facility bond, though current backing (53%) falls short of the two-thirds threshold required for a City-led effort; a citizen-led measure, however, may require only a simple majority.
In March 2025, the City Council directed staff to obtain cost estimates for a dedicated Civic Center project. The DLR Group has since provided renderings and rough order of magnitude (ROM) construction estimates of approximately $125 million. Staff now seeks City Council input and direction on the proposed Civic Center project.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
Over the past three years, many public meetings and discussions have been held on facility needs by the City Council, Board of Library Trustees, Community Services Commission, and Planning Commission. The items noted in this section are highlights of the ongoing community dialogue on city facility needs.
On January 10, 2023, the City Council awarded a contract to Myers Houghton and Partners, Inc. (MHP) to perform in-depth structural analysis and evaluation of the Library’s suitability for major renovations and initial visioning activities.
On September 12, 2023, the City Council received an update on the results of the comprehensive water system assessment, including information on future water rates. The water assessment identified more than $350 million in projects needed over the next 30 years, with $30 million being programmed for completion over the first five years.
On January 9, 2024, the City Council held a discussion on a the MHP Library assessment/visioning analysis and discussed funding options. Following discussion, the City Council directed staff to complete an overall condition analysis of major City facilities and undertake a community survey soliciting public input on a possible revenue measure.
On January 30, 2024, the City Council approved a Master Joint Use Agreement with the Glendora Unified School District (GUSD). While the agreement largely stipulates use of existing facilities and services provided by the City, the agreement does provide for better maintenance of GUSD Facilities and outlines a partnership methodology for joint capital upgrades (i.e., Glendora High School Aquatics Center).
On August 27, 2024, the City Council was provided the results of a community survey on a potential citywide and/or Library specific revenue measure. The survey, completed by True North Research, documented initial support for a citywide facility measure (53%) as opposed to Library specific bond measure (45%). Additionally, the survey highlighted the two highest quality of life improvements in the City as improving infrastructure/roads (17.8%) and addressing homelessness (17.2%).
On November 5, 2024, the Statewide ballot measure – ACA 5 – ballot failed (55% no). The State measure would have lowered the threshold for issuing facility bonds for cities and related local agencies, from 66.6% (2/3) to 55% (same as schools).
On November 12, 2024, the City Council approved an agreement with IDS Group, Inc. for Architectural, Engineering and Consultant Services for the City Corporate Yard Improvement Project in an amount not to exceed $725,581. The City will need to identify an estimated $13-15 million for the construction portion of the project, which will rehabilitate existing space and add a new building to increase the usable space by 10,000 square feet.
On February 25, 2025, the City Council received the FY 2024-25 Mid-Year Budget Update that documented approximately $50 million in current facility needs (e.g. new roofs, HVAC, etc.) that would largely keep City facilities as is. To significantly improve the City’s facilities to a modern standard and better meet current and future operational needs, the estimated costs would total more than $250 million.
On March 11, 2025, the City Council was provided with a comprehensive report on City facility capital needs, deferred maintenance, cost increases in capital projects, and funding options. As part of the discussion, the City Council directed staff to return with more specific needs and cost estimates for the civic center, which includes, the Library, Police Department, City Hall, and parking.
DISCUSSION
The City of Glendora is committed to improving its quality of life, with recent Strategic Plans prioritizing investment in parks, trails, streets, sidewalks, water systems, and civic facilities. Community surveys consistently identify infrastructure and homelessness as the City’s most pressing challenges. Over the past five years, more than $50 million has been invested in capital projects, including major park renovations, facility upgrades, and miles of street and water improvements.
Despite these efforts, decades of underinvestment have left the City with $50 million in deferred maintenance and over $250 million in needed modernization to create accessible, modern facilities for residents and staff. Funding these improvements remains difficult, as State and Federal support has declined and restrictions from Proposition 13 and related measures limit local resources.
While initial community surveys show 53% support for a citywide facility measure and 45% for a Library-specific measure, these levels fall short of the two-thirds voter approval required for a City-sponsored bond. A citizen-led initiative, however, may pass with a simple majority, offering the most viable path forward to address long-standing facility needs, including critical upgrades at the Library and other community spaces.
Past City Council actions noted in the Legislative History portion of this report offer detailed analyses of many aspects of the information noted above. To provide the community with as much detailed information as possible, the City Council directed staff to return with a comprehensive look at costs associated with a Civic Center project at its March 11, 2025 meeting. To this end, staff contracted with the DLR Group to provide renderings (Attachment A) and ROM cost estimates (Attachment B) for a Civic Center project that addresses the Library, Police Department, City Hall, Council Chambers, and parking.
Over the course of two months, City staff met with the DLR Group to discuss what a Civic Center project would entail. As part of its work, the DLR Group carried out a thorough evaluation of all existing civic center facilities.
This included reviewing as-built plans, site visits, incorporating findings from the Library structural analysis and visioning exercise, analyzing space planning needs, and studying site constraints such as the grade change between Glendora Avenue and Vista Bonita. These technical evaluations were paired with broader community and urban design considerations, including the planned First/Last Mile improvements along Glendora Avenue and the City’s overarching goal of ensuring the Civic Center campus more directly relates to the street. This effort was intended to strengthen the physical and visual connection between the Glendora Village and the Metro A Line station, bridging a key corridor.
The conceptual design takes inspiration from Glendora’s historic 1921 City Hall, using it as an architectural reference point. At the same time, the vision balances this reference point with the community’s desire for a futureready flexible facilities that will serve residents for the next century. The resulting architectural style blends classic civic character with contemporary amenities and design standards.
A central focus of the conceptual plan is the maximization of public space. The design incorporates a new and improved plaza area at the heart of the campus, envisioned as a flexible and vibrant gathering place. This plaza could host a wide range of community events and programs throughout the year, strengthening the Civic Center’s role as both a functional seat of government and a lively public destination.
While the renderings present an exciting vision, it is important to note that this is only a conceptual plan based on identified needs and opportunities for the Civic Center campus only - it is not a part of any other visioning plan, nor are any outlying buildings a part of this effort. For the project to move forward, it will require additional vetting, further refinement, and most importantly, robust public feedback and support. This concept serves as a starting point for community conversation, giving residents and stakeholders a shared framework to react to, discuss, and shape.
Recently, City staff met with a small group of residents who are interested in the City’s efforts to improve its civic facilities. At that meeting, the conceptual renderings and a rough cost estimate were shared to get some early feedback before bringing the information to the full City Council in a public setting. It was explained that these materials were still in conceptual/draft form and not yet ready for wide release. Unfortunately, they were shared publicly ahead of schedule, and some of the information included was incomplete or inaccurate and lacked the proper context.
FISCAL IMPACT
After decades of underinvestment, the City has made over $50 million in improvements in the past five years, including water projects, new streets and sidewalks, major park renovations, and facility upgrades. While these investments have greatly improved quality of life, rising capital costs and the continued deterioration of aging facilities—such as the civic complex, public works yard, Library, City Hall, and Police Department—require the City to consider new funding strategies.
Since Proposition 13, the City has had limited financial flexibility to fund major facility projects. Over the past three years, staff have undertaken structural assessments, space planning, and community visioning to better understand facility needs. Moving forward, meaningful community engagement will be essential as leaders explore the possibility of a facility bond to replace and modernize critical infrastructure, much like City leaders did more than 50 years ago to support future generations.
As part of its work, the DLR Group prepared a rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost estimate for the conceptual project (Attachment B). The estimate places total construction cost at approximately $125 million. This figure accounts for premiums related to phasing and occupancy, as well as escalation costs to the anticipated midpoint of construction in 2028. It is important to note that this is a preliminary (“high-level”) estimate intended to provide a sense of scale for the project. Actual project costs will continue to be refined based on the feedback received and market conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
CEQA is not applicable to the recommendations included in this agenda item.
Prepared By Moises Lopez, Assistant City Manager
Concurs With Not Applicable
Reviewed By Adam Raymond, City Manager
Certified to Availability of Funds Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review Not Applicable
CEQA Review Not Applicable
Attachments
A_Conceptual_Renderings.pdf
B_Rough_Order_of_Magnitude_Cost_Estimates.pdf
C_PowerPoint_Civic_Facility_Capital_Needs_Update.pdf
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC REVITALIZATION PROJECT
ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN
EXISITING VETERAN’S PLAZA
FOOTHILL BLVD
GLENDORA AVE
VISTA BONITA A ST
EXISITING CITY HALL (8,000 SF)
NEW LIBRARY (50,000 SF)
MAIN ENTRY WAY
STREET IMPROVEMENT
EXISTING POLICE STATION PARKING
EXISTING POLICE STATION (NEW ROOF)
NEW PARKING STRUCTURELEVEL B1 - 76 STALLSLEVEL 1 & 2 - 126 STALLS
NEW PARKING ENTRANCE
CITY HALL REPLACEMENT/ADDITION (9,000 SF)(3 LEVELS)PARKING ENTRANCE (STAFF ONLY)PLAZA W/ AMPHITHEATER SEATING (125’X195’)POLICE STATIONADDITION (8,000 SF)STAFF SUPPORT SPACES & OUTDOOR BBQ AREANARROWED STREET (FROM 40’ TO 30’)
INCREASED PARKING AREA
N (+/- 6 STALLS)
NORTHWEST AERIAL VIEW
(GLENDORA AVE AND FOOTHILL BLVD)
SOUTHWEST VIEW
(GLENDORA AVE)
PLAZA AND AMPHITHEATER VIEW
PLAZA AND AMPHITHEATER AERIAL VIEW
(VISTA BONITA ST)
3UHSDUHGIRU'/5*URXS
520&RVW(VWLPDWH
$XJXVW
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
&LYLF5HYLWDOL]DWLRQ
*OHQGRUD&$
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐWĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ
$UL]RQD_&DOLIRUQLD_)ORULGD_+DZDLL_,GDKR_1HYDGD_2UHJRQ_7H[DV_:DVKLQJWRQ &LW\RI*OHQGRUD
&LYLF5HYLWDOL]DWLRQ
*OHQGRUD&$
520&RVW(VWLPDWH $XJXVW
%$6,62)(67,0$7(
(67,0$7(0$5.836
7KHIROORZLQJPDUNXSVDUHLQFOXGHGLQWKLVHVWLPDWH
*HQHUDO&RQGLWLRQV ,QFOXGHGLQXQLWFRVWV
2YHUKHDGDQG3URILW
2+ 3
,QFOXGHGLQXQLWFRVWV
%RQGV ,QVXUDQFH ,QFOXGHGLQXQLWFRVWV
'HVLJQ&RQWLQJHQF\ ,QFOXGHGLQXQLWFRVWV
3KDVLQJ2FFXSDQF\3UHPLXP
(VFDODWLRQWR02& &RQVWUXFWLRQVWDUW-DQXDU\ZLWKPRQWKVGXUDWLRQ (VFDODWLRQSURMHFWLRQVSHUDQQXP
(;&/86,216
7KHIROORZLQJLWHPVDUHH[FOXGHGLQWKLVHVWLPDWH
,7(06$))(&7,1*&267(67,0$7(
,WHPVWKDWPD\FKDQJHWKHHVWLPDWHGFRQVWUXFWLRQFRVWPD\LQFOXGHEXWDUHQRWOLPLWHGWRWKHIROORZLQJ
8QIRUHVHHQVXEVXUIDFHFRQGLWLRQ
6ROHVRXUFHSURFXUHPHQW
$Q\FKDQJHVRUGHOD\IURPWKHSURMHFWHGFRQVWUXFWLRQVFKHGXOH &/$5,),&$7,216
2IIVLWHZRUN
1LJKWWLPHDQGZHHNHQGVZRUN
$FFHOHUDWHGFRQVWUXFWLRQVFKHGXOH
+D]DUGRXVPDWHULDOUHPRYDO
7KLVHVWLPDWHDVVXPHVGHVLJQELGEXLOGGHOLYHU\PHWKRG ,1752'8&7,21
7KLV&RVW(VWLPDWHLVEDVHGRQ520GLDJUDPVGDWHG$XJXVWDORQJZLWKYHUEDODQGZULWWHQJXLGDQFHIURPWKHGHVLJQWHDP 7KLVHVWLPDWHDVVXPHVWKHXVHRISUHYDLOLQJZDJHV7KHHVWLPDWHGRHVQRWLQFOXGHD3/$RU&6:3$ 7KLVHVWLPDWHLVEDVHGRQWKHDVVXPSWLRQRIDFRPSHWLWLYHELGHQYLURQPHQWE\DPLQLPXPRIIRXUDWWKH*HQHUDO&RQWUDFWRUDQG WKH6XEFRQWUDFWRUOHYHO
$Q\FKDQJHVWRWKHVFRSHRIZRUNQRWLQFOXGHGLQWKLVUHSRUW:HUHFRPPHQGXSGDWLQJWKHHVWLPDWHWRFDSWXUHWKHYDOXHRIDQ\ FKDQJHV
3URIHVVLRQDOIHHVLQVSHFWLRQVDQGWHVWLQJ
(VFDODWLRQEH\RQGWKHPLGSRLQWRIFRQVWUXFWLRQ-XO\ ))DQG(XQOHVVVSHFLILFDOO\UHIHUHQFHGLQWKLVHVWLPDWH 3ODQFKHFNIHHVDQGEXLOGLQJSHUPLWIHHV
&RQVWUXFWLRQ2ZQHU
VFRQWLQJHQF\FRVWV
&RQVWUXFWLRQPDQDJHPHQWIHHV
6RIWFRVWV
+D]DUGRXVPDWHULDOUHPRYDO
$VEHVWRVDEDWHPHQWKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOUHPRYDO
3DJHRI
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
&LYLF5HYLWDOL]DWLRQ
*OHQGRUD&$
520&RVW(VWLPDWH
6FRSH(OHPHQWV $UHD &RVW6) 7RWDO
0$-255(129$7,212)+,6725,&(;,67,1*&,7<+$//
%8,/',1*$//2:$1&( 6)
1(:&,7<+$//%8,/',1*6725<67((/6758&785(
$//2:$1&(
6)
1(:/,%5$5<%8,/',1*6725<67((/6758&785(
,1&/8',1*39%(66$//2:$1&( 6) 0,12502'(51,=$7,212)(;,67,1*3'%8,/',1*
,1&/8',1*1(:522)$//2:$1&( 6) 1(:32/,&('(3$570(17%8,/',1*6725<67((/
6758&785(,1&/8',1*(0(5*(1&<*(1(5$725
$//2:$1&(
6)
1(:6725<3$5.,1*6758&785(:,7+21(/(9(/
68%7(55$1($1 67$//6
62/$5&$532576+$'(6758&785(6$//2:$1&( 6) 6,7('(9(/230(17 6)
3+$6,1*2&&83$1&<35(0,80
(6&$/$7,217202&
&216758&7,21&2676800$5<
727$/(67,0$7('&216758&7,21&267
3DJHRI
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
&LYLF5HYLWDOL]DWLRQ
*OHQGRUD&$
520&RVW(VWLPDWH
2SWLRQ$
1HZ&LYLF&HQWHU
2QH3KDVH
3DJHRI
&LW\RI*OHQGRUD
&LYLF5HYLWDOL]DWLRQ
*OHQGRUD&$
520&RVW(VWLPDWH
(OHPHQW 4XDQWLW\ 8QLW 8QLW&RVW 7RWDO
&LW\+DOO
0DMRUUHQRYDWLRQRIKLVWRULFH[LVWLQJFLW\KDOOEXLOGLQJDOORZDQFH VI 1HZ&LW\+DOO%XLOGLQJVWRU\VWHHOVWUXFWXUHDOORZDQFH VI
/LEUDU\
1HZ/LEUDU\%XLOGLQJVWRU\VWHHOVWUXFWXUHLQFOXGLQJ39%(66 DOORZDQFH VI
3ROLFH'HSDUWPHQW
0LQRUPRGHUQL]DWLRQRIH[LVWLQJ3'EXLOGLQJLQFOXGLQJQHZURRI DOORZDQFH VI
1HZ3ROLFH'HSDUWPHQW%XLOGLQJVWRU\VWHHOVWUXFWXUHLQFOXGLQJ HPHUJHQF\JHQHUDWRUDOORZDQFH VI
3DUNLQJ6WUXFWXUH
1HZVWRU\SDUNLQJVWUXFWXUHZLWKRQHOHYHOVXEWHUUDQHDQ VWDOOV
6RODUFDUSRUWVKDGHVWUXFWXUHVDOORZDQFH VI 6LWH'HYHORSPHQW
7HPSRUDU\SURWHFWLRQVWUDIILFFRQWURODQGFRQVWUXFWLRQDFFHVV DOORZDQFH OV
6LWHGHPROLWLRQ
FOHDUDQGJUXELQFOXGLQJORWVRIWUHHV
DOORZDQFH VI
%XLOGLQJGHPROLWLRQ
OLEUDU\
DOORZDQFH VI
(DUWKZRUNDQGHURVLRQFRQWURO VI 6RLOUHPHGLDWLRQQRWLQFOXGHG ([FOXGHG
6LWHHOHFWULFDOVHUYLFHDQGGLVWULEXWLRQDOORZDQFH VI 6LWHOLJKWLQJ VI
6LWHORZYROWDJHLQFOXGLQJGDWDDQGVHFXULW\ VI
3DUNLQJ/RWLQFOXGLQJODQGVFDSHLVODQGVKDUGVFDSHFXUEV(9 FKDUJLQJDQGLQIUDVWUXFWXUHDOORZDQFH
VI
+DUGVFDSHDQGODQGVFDSHLQFOXGLQJRIIVLWHDOORZDQFH VI
3OD]DLQFOXGLQJDPSKLWKHDWHUVHDWLQJDOORZDQFH VI 5HZRUN9LVWD%RQLWD6WLQFOXGLQJQHZSDUNLQJVSDFHVDOORZDQFH VI 6LJQDJHDQGVSHFLDOWLHV VI
)HQFLQJDQGJDWHV
LQFOXGLQJVHFXULW\IHQFLQJDWSHULPHWHU
DOORZDQFH OV
7UDVKHQFORVXUHLQFOXGLQJVKDGHVWUXFWXUHRYHUWRSDOORZDQFH HD
6LWHXWLOLW\XSJUDGHVDOORZDQFH
)LUHZDWHU VI
'RPHVWLFZDWHU VI
6DQLWDU\VHZHU VI
*DVQRWUHTXLUHG ([FOXGHG
6WRUPGUDLQ VI
6XEWRWDO
3KDVLQJ2FFXSDQF\3UHPLXP
6XEWRWDO
(VFDODWLRQWR02&
727$/
&LYLF5HYLWDOL]DWLRQ'HWDLO(OHPHQWV
3DJHRI
CIVIC CENTER UPDATE
CITY COUNCILSEPTEMBER 9, 2025CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
Goal 3: New + Revitalized Facilities
¾Action 3.1: Funding methodology for Civic Center¾Action 3.3: Complete space planning assessment¾Action 3.4: Remodel vs. new build decision
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
¾$50M invested in infrastructure over past 5 years
¾$50M deferred maintenance + $250M modernization need¾Community survey: 53% support (below 2/3 threshold)¾Citizen-led initiative could pass with majority¾DLR Group renderings & ROM estimate: $125M
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
¾January 2023 Library assessment (MHP)
¾September 2023 Water system assessment ($350M need)
¾January 2024 Library funding discussion & survey
¾August 2024 Survey: 53% support citywide measure
¾November 2024 ACA 5 failed (bond threshold)¾February 2025 $50M deferred maintenance, $250M modernization need
¾March 2025 Comprehensive update on capital project
costs, revenue measures, and facilityneeds. City Council requested Civic Centercost estimates
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY/PREVIOUS ACTIONS
¾Glendora invested $50M in capital projects in 5 years
¾Facilities remain outdated and inefficient¾DLR Group conceptual plan: Library, Police, City Hall, Parking¾Design blends 1921 City Hall style with modern needs¾New plaza as public hub linking Village & Metro A Line¾Early drafts circulated prematurely; need structured review
DISCUSSION
PROJECT DETAILS
¾ City Hall
1921 Building renovated 9,000 square foot addition
¾ Library
New Building 50,000 square foot
¾ Plaza
Amphitheater Seating 24,000 square feet
¾ Police Station
8,000 square foot addition Six additional parking spaces ¾ Parking Garage
Three levels (one below grade) 202 total parking spaces
¾Estimated construction cost: $125M (ROM, 2028 midpoint) ¾Funding limited by Prop 13 restrictions¾Facility bond or similar revenue measure may be necessary¾Balance $50M deferred maintenance with $250M modernization need
FISCAL IMPACT
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the City Council:
1. Receive a report on the civic center
renderings and cost estimates; and,
2. Provide direction to staff.
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
,//8675$7,9(6,7(3/$1
(³IIb@ϙ«((bЍϙ[¾
(³IIb@ϙ
I´ϙF[[
b(®ϙ[I´ϙϼ͔͏Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>Ͻ
aIbϙ(b´ϙϼi[Ͻ
((ϙIai«(a(bϙϼbiϙIbϙ
i(Ͻ
(³IIb@ϙi[I
(ϙIibϙXIb@ϙ[i
iiXϙ"iϱi>>
(³IIb@ϙi[I
(ϙIibϙϼb(®ϙii>Ͻ
XIb@ϙ(bb
(ϼ[I
ϙ(b´Ͻ
b(®ϙXIb@ϙ
([(«([ϙ͐ϙЭϙ͑ϙϳ ͕͐͑ϙ[[[(«([ϙ͐ϙϳ ͖͕ϙ[[
I´ϙF[[ϙ(³bIibϯ([
(a(b͒ϙ[(«([ϙϼ͘Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>ϽXIb@ϙ(bb
(ϼ>>ϙib[´ϙ(b´Ͻ[¾ϙ®ϯϙaFIF((ϙ(Ib@ϼ͔͐͑ЍϙƄϙ͔͐͘ЍϽi[I (ϙIibϙ""IIib>>ϙiϙ
(ϙЭϙi"iiϙϙ(ϙϼ͗Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>Ͻbi®("ϙ((ϼ>iaϙ͓͏Ѝϙiϙ͒͏ЍϽIb (("ϙXIb@ϙ(
@[(b"iϙ«( ϼѭϯϱ ͕ϙ[[Ͻ
>iiFI[[ϙ[«"
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
352-(&7352*5$0',675,%87,21',$*5$0
[I´ϙϳ
I´ϙF[[ϙ(³bIibϯ([
(a(bϙϳ i[I
(ϙIibϙ""IIib
(ϙ[(«([ϙ""IIibϼ>>ϙiϯϙ>>ϙ"IbIb@
Ͻ
͒Ϡ͔͏͏>i[I
(ϙIibϙϼ͗Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>Ͻ
>>ϙϙ"(
X@ib"ϙ[(«([ϙ""I´Iibϼ>>ϙi
Ͻ
͓Ϡ͔͏͏ϙ>
I´ϙF[[ϙ(³bIibϙ͐Ϡ͒͏͏ϙ>
ϼIϙ"(a(b
Ͻ
(ϙ>[ii
I´ϙF[[ϙϼ"(aiϙ͗Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>Ϡϙ""IIibϙ͘Ϡ͏͏͏>
Ͻ
I´ϙF[[ϙ(³bIibϯϙ([
(a(bϙ͑Ϡ͖͏͏ϙ>
ϼ[I
ϙ(«I
(
Ͻ
@ib"ϙ>[ii
I´ϙF[[ϙ(³bIibϙ͑Ϡ͖͏͏ϙ>
ϼ
I´ϙ
ib
I[ϙ
Fa(Ͻϙ
[¾ϙ[(«([
[I´͔͏Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>
I´ϙF[[ϙ(³bIibϯϙ([
(a(bϙ͑Ϡ͒͏͏ϙ>
ϼ
iaabI´ϙ(I[ϙϯϙa((Ib@ϙiiaϽ
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
'%/2&.,1* 67$&.,1*',$*5$0
[I´
ia(ϙ"I«(bϙ®iX
(ϙϼ͐Ͻϼ[I
ϙ"I[´ϙϯϙ(
FϙF(ϙ¾ib(Ͻ͔Ϡ͑͏͏ϙ>
[I
ϙЭϙI«(ϙa((Ib@ϙiiaϙϼ͐Ͻ͒Ϡ͑͏͏ϙ>
aIbϙ(b´ϙ[i´ϙϯϙ[I´ϙ(«I
(͐Ϡ͕͏͏ϙ>
[I
ϙ
(ϙ(
Fbi[i@I(͕͏͏ϙ>Ib>
(ϙϼi"iiϽϙ͐Ϡ͒͏͏ϙ>
ѭϙa(
FbI
[ϙii>ϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙϙ͔Ϡ͏͏͏>
F´I
[ϙ
ib(bϙFi®iiaϙ͓͏͏͏ϙ>ϙЭϙ
FI«(ϙ͓͏͏ϙ>
iiXϙ"iϱi>>
>[>I[[a(bϙ
(b(ϙ(«I
(͓Ϡ͔͏͏ϙ>
[I
ϙ(a[´͔Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>
ia(ϙ"I«(bϙ®iX
(ϙϼ͑Ͻϼ®iXϙ"´ϙ¾ib(Ͻ͐Ϡ͗͏͏ϙ>Ib>
(ϙϙ͕͏͏ϙ>
[I´ϱa("I("ϙ[I
ϙ®iX
(
͓Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>
Ib>
(ϙ͐Ϡ͖͏͏ϙ>
Ib"iiϙaIbϙ[(I(ϙ
(ϙ͒Ϡ͐͏͏ϙ>
a[[ϙI«(ϙ
(ϙϼ͑Ͻϙ͖͏͏ϙ>
i"iiϙ[(I(ϙϙ͖͏͏ϙ>
>[(³I[(ϙ>(ϙ
(ϙϙ͑Ϡ͔͏͏ϙ>
>ii"ϙ(«I
(ϙϯϙ
(Ib@ϙϙ͑Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>
Ib>
(ϙϙ͑Ϡ͏͏͏ϙ>
[¾ϙ[(«([ϙϼϱ͓ЍϙϽ(ϙ[(«([ϙϼѭ͗Ѝϱ͐͑ЍϽ
CITY OF GLENDORA - CIVIC CENTER REVITALIZATION PROJECT
01240.0002 2070466.2
INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS The &LW\RI*OHQGRUD¶VCity Attorney has prepared the following ballot title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure pursuant to California Elections Code section 9203.
BALLOT TITLE
An Initiative Ordinance Authorizing a Special Parcel Tax to Fund the Construction, Repair, Rehabilitation, and Improvements to Facilities and Buildings Owned by the City of Glendora
SUMMARY
The proposed measure would authorize the City of *OHQGRUD ³&LW\´
WROHY\DQGFROOHFW a
special parcel tax in order to fund the construction, repair, improvement, and rehabilitation, of buildings and facilities owned by the City, including the Police Department, parks and community facilities, the City Library, City Hall, the City public works yard and transportation yard, and other existing or future City-owned facilities.
The measure would authorize the City Council to levy a special parcel tax on all properties within the City, subject to the maximum rates and exemptions set forth below. Each year, commencing on July 1, 2027, the City Council may determine whether to levy the tax and the amount of the tax to be levied, but such tax amounts cannot exceed the Maximum Special Parcel Tax rate (as defined below).
The ³0aximum Special Parcel Tax´ rates for fiscal year 2027±2028 are as follows:
x Single-Family Residential Parcels: $0.19 per square footage of buildings and structures located on such parcel(s).
x Single-Family Attached Residential Parcels (i.e., residential development of up to 4 units, including ADUs, JADUs, and SB9 units): $0.19 per square footage of buildings and structures located on such parcel(s).
x All Other Developed Parcels (i.e., multifamily residential development of 5 units or more, commercial developments, and other properties developed for non-residential purposes): $0.27 per square footage of buildings and structures located on such parcel(s). x Vacant Parcels: $150 per parcel.
Beginning in fiscal year 2028±2029, the Maximum Special Parcel Tax rates shall increase by 2 percent annually. The special parcel tax actually levied in any year by the City shall be determined pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council, but shall not exceed the applicable Maximum Special Parcel Tax rates for such year.
Parcels owned by governmental entities and parcels otherwise exempt from ad valorem property taxation under state law are exempt from the special parcel tax. The City Council may adopt additional exemptions as permitted by law.
01240.0002 2070466.2
The measure authorizes the City to levy the special parcel tax for a period of 35 years. After the 35-year period, the Maximum Special Parcel Tax will be automatically reduced by one-half unless the voters approve an amendment or otherwise determine to discontinue the tax.
The measure provides that the tax will be collected by the County Tax Collector in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes, including the same penalties, procedures, sale, and lien priority in cases of delinquency. All revenues generated from the tax must be deposited into a special fund and used solely for authorized purposes, including planning, engineering, financing, audits and administration. Funds may not be used for general City staff salaries, except for staff working exclusively on authorized projects. Oversight requirements include a City Council DSSRLQWHGFLWL]HQV¶RYHUVLJKWFRPPLWWHHDQQXDOSXEOLFUHSRUWLQJDQGDQLQGHSHQGHQWDQQXDO performance audit. Property owners may appeal the calculation or application of the tax through a City-administered appeal process.
Passage of this measure requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority (50% +1) of qualified voters.
Dated: December 22, 2025
Danny Aleshire
City Attorney
City of Glendora
CIVIC CENTER UPDATE
CITY COUNCILJANUARY 13, 2026CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
¾January 2023 Library assessment (MHP)
¾September 2023 Water system assessment ($350M need)
¾January 2024 Library funding discussion & survey
¾August 2024 Survey: 53% support citywide measure
¾November 2024 ACA 5 failed (bond threshold)¾February 2025 $50M deferred maintenance, $250M modernization need
¾March 2025 Comprehensive update on capital project
costs, revenue measures, and facilityneeds. City Council requested Civic Centercost estimates
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY/PREVIOUS ACTIONS
¾April 2025 Unanimous approval of 2025-2027 Strategic
Plan
¾June 2025 Update on deferred maintenance of City
facilities, information on revenue measures,
historical land use decisions, and update onrecent infrastructure investments ¾September 2025 City Council review of Civic Center renderings and costs
¾December 2025 Approval of DLR Group amendment to
implement City Council direction fromSeptember Civic Center discussion
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY/PREVIOUS ACTIONS
¾January 1963 Civic Center Visioning Plan: AWA Architects - Focused on current and future community needs- Identified significant City Hall structural issues ¾Prior to building of Current Police Station and Library - Police Station built through voter approved measure in 1965 - After failed Library revenue measure in 1955, City moved FireDepartment operations to the County and used pre-Prop 13property tax increases to finance current library building in1969
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE
¾LA Times Article: July 5, 2002
Upscale Suburb Warned Its Beauty is Only Skin Deep“It’s a fairly well-to-do suburb with multimillion-dollar mansions in the foothills and a bustling commercial center,but Glendora’s infrastructure is crumbling, and the city cannotafford repairs.”“But experts say Glendora’s current financial difficulties are farfrom unique among the state’s more than 500 cities. Publicspending on infrastructure in California has declined morethan 75% since the 1960s.”
WE HAVE BEEN HERE BEFORE
¾Glendora prioritizes quality of life through investment in core infrastructure
¾Recent Strategic Plans consistently emphasize:
- Parks, trails, streets, sidewalks
- Water systems- Civic and public safety facilities
¾Community surveys identify infrastructure and homelessness as top challenges
¾$50+ million invested in capital improvements over the last five years
WHY THIS DISCUSSION MATTERS
¾Decades of underinvestment have resulted in:
- $50 million in deferred maintenance- $250+ million in facility modernization needs ¾Facilities must meet:
- Accessibility- Safety- Seismic- Operational standards ¾State and Federal funding has declined significantly¾Significant changes to local revenue landscape (e.g. Prop 13)
THE INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGE
¾Attachment A: Deferred Maintenance on City Facilities, Capital Needs, Historical Capital Cost Increases, and Funding Options (March 11, 2025) ¾Attachment B: Update on City Facilities and Capital Needs, Historical Land Use and Population discussion, and Revenue Measure Options (June 24, 2025) ¾Attachment C: Initial Civic Center Renderings and Rough Order of Magnitude Costs (September 9, 2025) Note: These attachments also contain information from other City Council discussions: library structural assessment, history of current civic center, changes in public finance, revenue measure community survey, etc.
BACKGROUND ON DETAILED CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSIONS
¾First comprehensive library evaluation in decades (MHP Study) - Structural and seismic deficiencies- Aging mechanical, electrical, plumbing systems- Building envelope limitations ¾Many deficiencies are systemic, not solvable with minor repairs¾Functional constraints limit modern service delivery - Youth and teen programming- Group study and meeting space- Technology and digital learning LIBRARY STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT AND VISIONING (JANUARY 2023-JANUARY 2024) ¾Council recognized:
- Addressing one facility alone creates long-term challenges- City Hall, Police, community centers, and public works yardsface similar issues ¾Direction given to:
- Explore funding options- Align investments with community priorities-Conduct a community survey on potential revenue measures
BROADER FACILITIES CONVERSATION
¾Statistically valid survey conducted by True North Research ¾Key findings:
- Strong value placed on infrastructure investment- 53% support for a citywide facilities measure- 45% support for a Library-only measure ¾Below 2/3 threshold for City-sponsored bond¾Reinforced need for:
- Public education- Transparency
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SURVEY (AUGUST 2024)
¾Facilities, streets, and utilities largely built 1950s–1970s - Aging simultaneously across systems
¾Post WWII Suburban development patterns:
- High infrastructure costs per capita
- Lack of ongoing revenue to maintain/replace streets roads- Limited development impact fees to replace City facilities- Limited commercial tax base ¾Water system alone requires $350 million over next 30 years¾Facilities needs remain substantial despite recent investments
CITYWIDE CAPITAL NEEDS AND CONTEXT
¾Measures E/Z, significant grants, and strategic use of capital funds have enabled:
- $60+ million invested since 2020- $108+ million in programmed future projects ¾City’s construction costs have often doubled since 2019¾State and Federal fund for infrastructure have decreased by over 50% in last 20+ years
¾Each dollar now delivers less infrastructure value¾Gap between needs and resources continues to widen
RECENT INVESTMENTS & COST PRESSURES
¾DLR Group engaged to prepare:
- High-level conceptual renderings- Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimates ¾Scope includes:
- Library, Police Department, City Hall, Council Chambers,and Parking ¾Urban design considerations:
- Glendora Avenue- First/Last Mile improvements- Village and Metro A Line connectivity
CIVIC CENTER CONCEPTUAL WORK
¾ROM construction cost of $125 million:
- Phasing and occupancy premiums- Escalation to 2028 construction midpoint ¾High-level estimate only, costs subject to:
- Community feedback- Market conditions- Refinement over time
CIVIC CENTER PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
¾Excerpt from September 2025 Staff Report:
“This concept serves as a starting point for
community conversation, giving residents andstakeholders a shared framework to react to,discuss, and shape.”
CIVIC CENTER CONCEPTUAL WORK
¾Renderings are:
- Conceptual and exploratory- Not a final design or commitment ¾Emphasis on:
- Clear assumptions, cost uncertainty, fiscal responsibility,phasing options ¾Historic City Hall as inspiration —not prescription¾Balance placemaking with:
- Core services, operational efficiency, and affordability
CIVIC CENTER CITY COUNCIL FEEDBACK
PROJECT DETAILS
¾ City Hall
1921 Building renovated
9,000 square foot addition Demo of Council Chambers and office space to allow room for parking and library ¾ Library
New Building
50,000 square foot
¾ Plaza
Amphitheater Seating 24,000 square feet
¾ Police Station
8,000 square foot addition Six additional parking spaces ¾ Parking Garage
Three levels (one below grade)
202 total parking spaces
UPDATED CIVIC CENTER
WALKTHROUGH
¾ Notice of Intent received December 11, 2025
¾ Proposed special parcel tax
- Based on square footage- Variable by property type- Restricted to City facility capital improvements ¾ Accountability measures:
- Independent audits- Annual reporting- Citizen oversight committee ¾ Estimated revenue: $8–$9 million annually
- Authority for City Council to reduce amounts, and exempt certainproperty, which would lower estimated revenues POTENTIAL CITIZEN INITIATIVE (NOVEMBER 2026 TARGET)
¾ Ballot title and summary issued December 22, 2025 by City Attorney ¾ 3,700 signatures required within 180 days¾ If qualified, City Council may:
- Oppose- Support- Take no position
POTENTIAL CITIZEN INITIATIVE BALLOT PROCESS & CITY COUNCIL ROLE Goal 3: New + Revitalized Facilities
¾Action 3.1: Funding methodology for Civic Center¾Action 3.3: Complete space planning assessment¾Action 3.4: Remodel vs. new build decision¾Focus of agenda item: Actions 3.1 and 3.4
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
¾ $125M project debt service: $9–$10 million annually
¾ $9 million is 16% of General Fund and Measures E/Z
- Equivalent to total operating cost of Recreation & Human Services, Library, City Manager, City Clerk, Human Resources,Finance and Risk Management- Police, Public Works, and Community & EconomicDevelopment represent approximately 70% of all General Fund and Measure E/Z funds
FINANCIAL CONTEXT
1. Pursue City-sponsored ballot measure (2026 or beyond)
2. Modify service levels to free General Fund and Measure E/Z capacity
3. Wait-and-see approach on citizen initiative, and continue to seek grants
4. Combination or alternative direction
FUNDING METHODOLOGY OPTIONS
1. Adopt revised conceptual drawings as baseline
2. Direct further refinements3. Take a new project approach4. Combination of options
CIVIC CENTER DESIGN DIRECTION OPTIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the City Council:
1. Receive a report on updated civic
center renderings, cost estimates, and funding scenarios; and
2. Provide direction to staff in
accordance with the 2025-2027 Strategic Plan New+RevitalizedFacilities Goal relating to the Civic Center: Actions 3.1 (funding methodology) and Action 3.4 (new/remodel).
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: February 24, 2026
FROM: City Manager DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Use of One-Time Funds
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Receive an overview on one-time funding opportunities; and
2. Provide direction, as needed.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 3 - New + Revitalized Facilities
Goal 4 - Sustainable Infrastructure
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Over the past decade, Glendora restored its financial stability by addressing a $3–$4 million structural deficit through voter-approved sales tax measures, pension restructuring, and stronger reserve and capital funding policies. These reforms earned the City a AAA bond rating and enabled targeted investments in infrastructure, public safety, and homelessness response aligned with community priorities. With the recent passage of Measure Z and a continued focus on long-term planning, the City remains committed to fiscal discipline while carefully balancing limited resources against ongoing service and infrastructure needs.
At the January 13, 2026, staff committed to returning to the City Council with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources during or after the mid-year budget update. This discussion will outline existing one-time funds, document how the City has prepared for future fiscal challenges, and provide examples of how those funds could be utilized. For the past seven years, the City Council has supported a transparent, policy driven dialogue that reflects the City Council’s continued commitment to thoughtful decision making and its ongoing work alongside staff to strengthen Glendora's financial foundation, address decades of differed maintenance, and improve the community for years to come.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
At the January 13, 2026, staff committed to returning to the City Council with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources during or after the mid-year budget update.
On February 24, 2026, the City Council received the FY 2025-2026, mid-year budget update (same meeting this this agenda item).
DISCUSSION
During the city facility and infrastructure discussion on January 13, 2026, staff committed to returning to the City Council with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources in concert with the mid-year budget update. This discussion will outline existing one-time funds, provide context on how the City has prepared for future fiscal challenges, and provide examples of how those funds could be utilized. These examples, will represent policy decisions/direction of the City Council.
For the better part of a decade, the City of Glendora has undertaken a deliberate and disciplined transformation of its fiscal policies, allowing the City to confront long-standing challenges, while positioning the organization for longterm stability. In fiscal years 2017-18 and 2018-19, the City projected General Fund deficits exceeding $1 million annually. As leadership transitioned and deeper analysis was conducted, it became clear that the structural imbalance was far more significant, at closer to $3–$4 million per year. Recognizing the seriousness of the situation, the City had already convened a citizen advisory committee to evaluate paths to financial sustainability, including land sales, operational efficiencies, service reductions, outsourcing and potential revenue enhancements.
The committee ultimately recommended that the City Council place a local sales tax measure on the ballot. While the typical local measure is 1.0%, Los Angeles County’s Measure H had already claimed 0.25%, limiting the City’s available rate. In 2019, the City Council placed Measure E, a 0.75% sales tax, before the voters, and the measure was approved. Concurrently, the City issued a Pension Obligation Bond (POB), generating annual savings of more than $1 million and significantly improving long-term pension cost predictability.
With the passage of Measure E and the issuance of the POB, the City Council directed staff to modernize Glendora’s fiscal framework. Updated fiscal policies were adopted that aligned with the City’s strategic plan and reflected a commitment to weathering an uncertain economic future. These changes included strengthening the General Fund Reserve, establishing a discretionary capital projects fund/reserve, shoring up internal service funds (e.g. Fleet, Technology, etc.) and intentionally setting aside resources for future pension obligations. Together, these policies represented foundational change by acknowledging both the scale of past under-investment and the need for sustained discipline in future years to address infrastructure demands, service expectations, and the uncertain fiscal landscape in California. These foundational changes would allow the City time to make significant policy decisions during recessions without immediate impacts to services, and the possibility to address certain facility needs during emergencies.
The results of this fiscal stewardship have been significant. Glendora earned an AAA bond rating for its General Fund, an achievement shared by fewer than 20 cities statewide, validating the City Council’s long-term approach to financial governance. In the years that followed, the City continued its stewardship of taxpayer money. The City made significant investments in technology and modernized its operations, eliminating duplicative functions, restructuring departments to better serve the public, and expanding strategic use of the private sector in hard to recruit service areas. At the same time, the City undertook comprehensive assessments of its infrastructure systems, including water, parks/trails, trees, streets, facilities, and technology (infrastructure studies).
Guided by the principle that “what gets funded gets done,” the City has relied on scientifically valid community surveys, foundational infrastructure studies, and City Council direction to shape multi-year strategic plans. These plans are directly integrated into the annual budget and departmental work programs, ensuring alignment between community priorities, fiscal decisions, and staff efforts. The outcomes have been measurable and, in many respects, historic. For the first time in decades, overall street conditions improved from one decade to the next, albeit minimal. Chronic vacancy challenges have been mitigated, with targeted investments in public safety, recreation and human services, public works, and water—each directly tied to community quality of life and safety concerns.
Nowhere is this philosophy more evident than in the City’s recent investments in public safety and homelessness response. Community feedback consistently identified emergency responsiveness, neighborhood safety, and visible homelessness impacts as top priorities. In response, the City Council made intentional, ongoing investments in people and systems. These investments include additional sworn police officers, added dispatch personnel to improve response times, enhanced emergency operations and preparedness capacity, and the creation and expansion of a Community Impact Team focused on proactive engagement and community problem solving.
The City has also increased funding for service providers and regional partnerships to address homelessness through outreach, case management, and supportive services, enforcement, and clean-up. Together, these investments reflect a shift from reactive responses to a more coordinated, data informed, and professional approach aligned with community expectations.
Despite this progress, significant challenges remain. The impacts of homelessness, increasing state mandates, loss of local control, insurance, and the absence of a permanent funding source for capital improvements continue to place pressure on City finances. While Glendora has made generational investments in infrastructure over the past five to seven years, decades of under-investment cannot be reversed overnight. These efforts have been strengthened by the successful pursuit of tens of millions of dollars in grants and state and federal appropriations, supporting projects ranging from parks and first/last-mile improvements to school site traffic safety and signalized intersections.
Recognizing the importance of keeping local dollars local, the City Council placed Measure Z on the November 2024 ballot, a 0.25% sales tax measure designed to preserve local revenue capacity and offset prior countywide tax measures. Glendorans understood and supported this need, with affirmative election results materially above those of Measure E. Measure Z reflects the City Council’s continued commitment to fiscal sustainability and local control, by keeping funds local and ensuring that Glendora remains positioned to fund essential services and community priorities in an increasingly constrained fiscal environment.
That same forward looking mindset is reflected in the City’s current Strategic Plan, adopted in early 2025. The plan continues to direct staff to actively pursue additional and diversified revenue opportunities, including potential development in the South Hills area, strategic economic development investments, and redevelopment opportunities at underutilized sites owned by other governmental agencies and the City itself. Many of these actions were originally recommended to the City Council during the citizen committee meetings in 2018 and 2019.
These efforts underscore the ongoing work of the City Council and staff to responsibly grow the City’s revenue base while remaining consistent with the City Council's other long-term planning goals.
Due to the City's fiscal reforms, the City has some capacity to consider one-time investments; resources that would not exist without the foundational changes made years earlier. However, these same resources are needed to address competing priorities, including streets, parks, city facilities and long-term financial resilience.
Discretionary One-Time Funding Breakdown
The General Fund, Pension Stabilization Fund, Measures E/Z Fund, GUSD JUA Fund, and Capital Projects Fund are discretionary funding sources for the City. Staff evaluated each fund, taking note of:
Fund balance/ reserve levels;
Ability of re-prioritization of capital projects;
One-time funding from property sales;
Future development opportunities of other local agencies; and Options for strategic use of amounts set aside for pension and other post-employment benefit costs.
Attachment A to this report provides a detailed analysis of one-time funding opportunities. The report is broken down by two-year budget cycle (FY 2025-2027, FY 2027-2029, and FY 2029-2031) and by major category (e.g. fund balance/reserves, reallocation of CIP, property development, pension/OPEB reserves, etc.).
Available Fund Balance/Use of Reserves
Currently, the City has approximately $18.3 million in the General Fund Reserve. The General Fund reserve policy requires a minimum of 30% to maximum of 45% of prior year operational expenditures; currently the City maintains a 40% reserve level. The reserve policy range represents the ability to fund approximately 3 to 6 months of General Fund operations in the absence of any other revenue received. The amount of General Fund reserve in excess of the minimum (30%) is approximately $4.58 million. In addition to the General Fund, the City's has an estimated $2.28 million in fund balance in the Measures E/Z fund that can be used for discretionary purposes.
During the FY 2027-2029 and FY 2029-2031 two year budget cycles, staff anticipates additional Measures E/Z fund balance of $569,000 and $260,000 respectively.
The use of General Fund reserves and Measures E/Z fund balance can impact the City's bond rating and operational flexibility during an economic downturn. Without reserves at certain levels, future borrowing costs may be higher and the City may have to look at more immediate/significant service cuts to the community in lieu of targeted use of reserves during major emergencies or economic downturns. Ample reserves allows the City Council time to make targeted, policy oriented service reductions when needed.
Reallocation of CIP
Staff has identified an opportunity for the City Council to reallocate approximately $1.9 million of existing projects to other priorities, if needed. Currently, the City's discretionary capital projects fund has approximately $1 million in projects aimed at the civic center (e.g. Council chamber remodel/expansion, civic center roofing, etc.).
The City and Glendora Unified School District (GUSD) have a long history of partnering on community assets (e.g. middle school parks, high school pool, etc.). GUSD has a current pool renovation project, in which the City has contributed $600,000 to the $4 million dollar project. Additionally, the City Council approved an additional contribution of up to $900,000 that is dependent on the City's financial performance through June 30, 2027.
As the City's civic center project is not underway and the GUSD pool project came in under budget ($5.8 million down to $4 million), funding may be reallocated. The City Council may also want to explore the use of the $900,000 pool project funding, to leverage the recent $1.2 million federal appropriate the City helped GUSD secure for the Sandburg Middle School track and lighting project. The future project area at Sandburg Middle School operates as a City park after 4pm.
Disposition/Sale of City Owned Properties
The sale of the San Jose site provided the City with $3.99 million. The City Council previously allocated $1 million of these proceeds to achieve initiatives in the City's strategic and economic development action plans (8/27/2024), leaving $2.99 million for future use. Additionally, staff anticipates an estimated $2.1 million to be received by June 30, 2027 for the sale of the Dale site. This funding will be dependent upon approval of a development in accordance with the City's standards and actions by the Planning Commission and City Council.
With the sale of San Jose and Dale project sites, staff anticipates a total of approximately $5.1 million available within the next 16 months, with approximately $3 million available now.
Pension/OPEB Reserves
Through the direction and approval of the City Council, staff have set up Section 115 Trusts and Reserves for future pension liabilities, including CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL), future pension obligation bond (POB) payments, and
Below is a summary of the totals included on Attachment A and described above.
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle
Totals
FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31
Available Fund
Balance/Reserves $ 6,860,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000
Reallocation of CIP $ 1,900,000 $ - $ -
Property Sales $ 5,120,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
Pension Set Aside $ 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000
OPEB Set Aside $ 4,080,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000
Grand Totals $ 31,780,000 $ 4,889,000 $ 4,500,000
Future Policy Considerations
Due to the City's fiscal reforms, over the past seven years the City has created capacity to consider one-time investments; resources that would not exist without the foundational changes made years earlier. However, these same resources are needed to address competing priorities, including streets, parks, city facilities and long-term financial resilience. The City's current strategic plan includes action items to quantify facility needs and identify funding opportunities for streets and city facilities. Below are examples of policy areas the City Council may need to take into consideration when discussing one-time use of discretionary funds:
Strategic use of one-time funds for street improvements to bridge existing gap of $3-3.5 million to raise PCI from a 63 to a 70 over the next seven years.
Possible targeted use of one-time funds now, back-filled with future funding opportunities (e.g. sale of property, development of local agency owned property). This policy direction could be used for either streets or city facilities.
Pay-down of future POB obligations in 2029 to free up $1.5 million in cash flow savings that could be used for another priority (e.g. streets).
Prioritization of city facility needs (e.g. public works yard, library, roofing needs, etc.).
Impacts on operational flexibility and services to the community during economic downturns, without ability to use general fund or pension reserves.
Impacts on future liabilities with more or less funding for street/sidewalk projects.
Impacts of bond ratings and future borrowing costs with the use of reserves.
The City Council is well versed in the need to utilize one-time funding in the most efficient manner possible. For example, in May 2023, the City Council received a report estimating approximately $8 million in needs, subject to further study (e.g. waterproofing, footings, etc.), for moderate repairs to the Library, including plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and structural upgrades. When a potential grant opportunity requiring a significant City match of up to $4 million was ultimately unavailable, the City Council and Library Board unanimously concluded that committing $8–$10+ million for a repair project with no guarantee of resolving underlying facility issues was not the most prudent course at that time. This decision was not a reflection of the Library’s importance, but rather an example of the careful fiscal policy trade-offs required when limited resources must address multiple critical needs. As the City reviews the opportunities and costs for a significant civic center renovation aimed to address decades of issues for future generations of Glendorans, the City Council has continued to evaluate the needs of many infrastructure challenges, including streets, the Library and the City's public works yard - the use of one-time funding will assist with that analysis.
Other Financial Information
This report focuses on the use of one-time discretionary funding sources. In full acknowledgment that governmental or "fund" accounting can be difficult to understand, staff developed two additional attachments to this report. Attachment C covers the City's investment portfolio and Attachment D addresses how the various city funding sources must be used. As always, the goal is to provide information to those who would like to educate themselves on City finances in the most transparent and easy to understand method possible.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendations in this report. As City Council direction on the use of one-time funds is provided, staff will evaluate the fiscal impact of each policy decision on the City. Generally, impacts from the use of one-time funding are:
Limited operational flexibility during future economic downturns (impacts on service delivery); Diminished ability to address one-time infrastructure issues; Downgrade of bond rating (increased borrowing costs);
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There is no CEQA impacts associated with the recommendations in this report.
Prepared By: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Marie Ricci, Deputy City Manager
Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_Discretionary_One-time_Funding_FINAL.pdf
B. Presentation.pdf
C_Cash_and_Investment_Pool_Explained_FINAL.pdf
D_Budget_Explained_FINAL.pdf
Anticiapted One-Time Discretionary Funding Opportunities Attachment A FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund
Balance/Reserve $ 569,000 6,860,000 $ $ 260,000
In Excess of Policy 1 $ 569,000 2,280,000 $ 260,000 $
45%
30% $ 4,580,000
Reallocation of CIP $ - 1,900,000 $ - $
Reprioritization of Projects $ 1,000,000
GUSD Pool 2 $ 900,000
Property Sales $ 4,000,000 5,120,000 $ 4,000,000 $
San Jose 3 $ 2,990,000
Dale 4 $ 2,130,000
Other Local Agency
Development 5 $ 4,000,000 4,000,000 $
Pension Set Aside $ 240,000 13,820,000 $ 180,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6 $ 6,090,000
Reserve 7 $ 240,000 7,730,000 $ 180,000 $
OPEB Set Aside $ 80,000 4,080,000 $ 60,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6 $ 2,060,000
Reserve 7 $ 80,000 2,020,000 $ 60,000 $
Grand Totals $ 4,080,000 13,780,000 $ 4,060,000 $ 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000 $ 2,280,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 31,780,000 $ 4,889,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 These funds are generally restricted. Currently, these funds have been set aside for investment in the Section 115 Trusts as cash on hand/liquidity allows through the City Council Adopted General Fund Reserve Policy. The monies may be accessed immediately by the City until they are invested in the Section 115 Trusts, at which time they may only be used to offset future/current pension liabilities. See note 6 with respect to pension and OPEB liabilities outstanding.
NOTES
Category: One-Time
Discretionary Funding
Staff anticipated an estimated $2.1 million to be received by June 30, 2027 for the sale of the Dale site. This funding will be dependent upon approval of a development in accordance with the City's standards and actions by the Planning Commission and City Council.
GUSD JUA
105 301
Capital Projects Totals
101
General Fund
102
Pension
103
Measures E/Z
The General Fund reserve policy is a minimum of 30% to maximum of 45% of prior year operational expenditures. Total of $4.6 million is the amount in excess of the reserve minimum (30%). The amount in the Measure E/Z fund balance is available in it's entirety ($2.3 million). The City's Reserve Policy provides the City Council time to make decisions in economic downturns or funding loss from the State of California without significant impacts to service delivery to the community. Further this funding provides a stabilization to meet debt requirements, which partially resulted in the City's AAA bond ratings. Per the existing financial policies of the City Council, when General Fund revenues exceed expenditures it allows the City to set aside monies in reserve, future capital projects, stabilization of CalPERS pension/OPEB costs, as well as general liabilities, worker's compensation, fleet maintenance and technology costs. More specifically, when revenues exceed expenditures, the City's financial policies allocated that amount at the following percentages 50% to the Capital Projects Fund, 30% to the PERS Rate Stabilization Fund, 10% to OPEB Section 115 Trust (held in General Fund) and 10% to Internal Service Funds.
The City and Glendora Unified School District (GUSD) have a long history of partnering on community assets (e.g. middle school parks, high school pool, etc.). GUSD has a current pool renovation project, in which the CIty has contributed $600,000 to the $3.9 million dollar project. Additionally, the City Council approved an additional contribution of up to $900,000 that is dependent on the City's financial performance through June 30, 2027.
The sale of the San Jose site provided the City with $3.99 million. The City Council previously allocated $1 million of these proceeds to achieve initiatives in the City's strategic and economic development action plans (8/27/2024).
These funds are generally restructured and may only be used to pay for CalPERS retirement costs (Pension) or reimburse qualifying retired employees' medical premiums (OPEB). The monies may be accessed by the City to pay for specific liabilities, requiring certification of the expense. Currently, the City's CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL) is $21.7 million, which is anticipated to be reduced to $10.3 million next year with CalPERS better than anticipated asset returns. Additionally, the City has an other post employment benefits (OPEB) liability of approximately $5.6 million. Finally, the City has an outstanding pension obligation bond principal amount of approximately $51 million.
Amounts represent possible funding received through sale and development of land owned other local agencies over the next five years.
ONE-TIME FUNDING
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE / FINANCE DEPARTMENTCITY COUNCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 24, 2026KYLE JOHNSON, FINANCE DIRECTORADAM RAYMOND, CITY MANAGER
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Glendora has restored financial stability over the last seven years o Addressed $3–$4M structural deficit
o Voter-approved Measures E & Zo Pension restructuring (POB)o Significantly strengthened reserve, liability and capital funding policieso Modernized city/departmental operationso Earned AAA bond rating
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Results have been significant
o Generational investments in infrastructure
o Improved street conditions (PCI upward trend, albeit small), reversing decades of decline o Significant investments in public safety, homelessnesso Reduced chronic vacancieso Major investments in technologyo $50+ million in grant revenues (e.g. Finkbiner stormwater, intersections, first/last mile)
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
• January 13, 2026 – Staff committed to broader one-time funding discussion• February 24, 2026 – Mid-Year Budget Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Glendora has restored financial stability over the last seven years o Addressed $3–$4M structural deficit
o Voter-approved Measures E & Zo Pension restructuring (POB)o Strengthened reserves and capital funding policieso Earned AAA bond rating
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Note Description
1 The General Fund reserve policy is a minimum of 30% to maximum of 45% of prior year operational expenditures. Total of $4.6 million is the amount in excess of the reserve minimum (30%). When revenues exceed expenditures, the City's financial policies allocated that amount at the following percentages 50% to the Capital Projects Fund, 30% to the PERS Rate Stabilization Fund, 10% to OPEB Section 115 Trust (held in General Fund) and 10% to Internal Service Funds. 3 The sale of the San Jose site provided the City with $3.99 million. The City Council previously allocated $1 million of these proceeds to achieve initiatives in the City's strategic and economic development action plans (8/27/2024). 4 Staff anticipated an estimated $2.1 million to be received by June 30, 2027 for the sale of the Dale site. This funding will be dependent upon approval of a development in accordance with the City's standards and actions by the Planning Commission and City Council. 5 Amounts represent possible funding received through sale and development of land owned other local agencies over the next five years.
6 These funds are generally restructured and may only be used to pay for CalPERS retirement costs (Pension) or reimburse qualifying retired employees' medical premiums (OPEB). The monies may be accessed by the City to pay for specific liabilities, requiring certification of the expense. Currently, the City's CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL) is $21.7 million, which is anticipated to be reduced to $10.3 million next year with CalPERS better than anticipated asset returns. Additionally, the City has an other post employment benefits (OPEB) liability of approximately $5.6 million. Finally, the City has an outstanding pension obligation bond principal amount of approximately $51 million. 7 These funds are generally restricted. Currently, these funds have been set aside for investment in the Section 115 Trusts as cash on hand/liquidity allows through the City Council Adopted General Fund Reserve Policy. The monies may be accessed immediately by the City until they are invested in the Section 115 Trusts, at which time they may only be used to offset future/current pension liabilities. See note 6 with respect to pension and OPEB liabilities outstanding.
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Note Description
6 These funds are generally restructured and may only be used to pay for CalPERS retirement costs (Pension) or reimburse qualifying retired employees' medical premiums (OPEB). The monies may be accessed by the City to pay for specific liabilities, requiring certification of the expense. Currently, the City's CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL) is $21.7 million, which is anticipated to be reduced to $10.3 million next year with CalPERS better than anticipated asset returns. Additionally, the City has an other post employment benefits (OPEB) liability of approximately $5.6 million. Finally, the City has an outstanding pension obligation bond principal amount of approximately $51 million. 7 These funds are generally restricted. Currently, these funds have been set aside for investment in the Section 115 Trusts as cash on hand/liquidity allows through the City Council Adopted General Fund Reserve Policy. The monies may be accessed immediately by the City until they are invested in the Section 115 Trusts, at which time they may only be used to offset future/current pension liabilities. See note 6 with respect to pension and OPEB liabilities outstanding.
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2
Property Sales
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6 $ 6,090,000
Reserve7 $ 240,000 7,730,000 $ 180,000 $
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000 $
102
Pension
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1 $ 569,000 2,280,000 $ 260,000 $
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2
Property Sales
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 2,280,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000 $
103
Measures E/Z
Note Description
1 The amount in the Measure E/Z fund balance is available in it's entirety ($2.3 million).
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Note Description
2 The City and Glendora Unified School District (GUSD) have a long history of partnering on community assets (e.g. middle school parks, high school pool, etc.). GUSD has a current pool renovation project, in which the CIty has contributed $600,000 to the $3.9 million dollar project. Additionally, the City Council approved an additional contribution of up to $900,000 that is dependent on the City's financial performance through June 30, 2027.
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2 $ 900,000
Property Sales
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 900,000 $ - $ - $
GUSD JUA
105
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Notes
Reprioritization of discretionary capital project funding, largely consisting of future civic center projects (e.g. roof replacement, council chamber expansion, etc.).
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of Projects $ 1,000,000GUSD Pool 2
Property Sales
San Jose3Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6Reserve7
Grand Totals 1,000,000 $ - $ - $
301
Capital Projects
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance $ 569,000 6,860,000 $ 260,000 $
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP $ - 1,900,000 $ - $
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2
Property Sales $ 4,000,000 5,120,000 $ 4,000,000 $
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside $ 240,000 13,820,000 $ 180,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside $ 80,000 4,080,000 $ 60,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 31,780,000 $ 4,889,000 $ 4,500,000 $
Totals
FUTURE POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
• Examples of policy areas the City Council may need to take into consideration when discussing one-time use of discretionary funds:
o Strategic use of one-time funds for street improvements to bridge existing gap of $3- 3.5 million to raise PCI from a 63 to a 70 over the next seven years. o Possible targeted use of one-time funds now, backfilled with future funding opportunities (e.g. Sale of property, development of local agency owned property). This policy direction could be used for either streets or city facilities.o Pay-down of future POB obligations in 2029 to free up $1.5 million in cash flow savings that could be used for another priority (e.g. Streets).
FUTURE POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
• Examples of policy areas the City Council may need to take into consideration when discussing one-time use of discretionary funds:
o Prioritization of city facility needs (e.g. public works yard, library, roofing needs, etc.). o Impacts on operational flexibility and services to the community during economic downturns, without ability to use general fund or pension reserves.o Impacts on future liabilities with more or less funding for street/sidewalk projects. o Impacts of bond ratings and future borrowing costs with the use of reserves.
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
• Government “fund” accounting is difficult to understand o Attachment C – Overview of City’s investment portfolio and what funding is for o Attachment D – Overview of the various funding sources and what is discretionary and what is not
RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:1. RECEIVE AN OVERVIEW ON ONE-TIME FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES; AND2. PROVIDE DIRECTION, AS NEEDED.
Attachment C (Cash and Investment Pool Explained)
Why the City’s $125 Million Cash and Investment Balance Isn’t a Giant Piggy Bank Executive Summary
The City of Glendora maintains approximately $125 million in pooled cash and investments.
While that number may sound like unrestricted money available for any purpose, the vast majority of those funds are legally restricted, contractually committed, or reserved for specific uses.
Government fund accounting requires that dollars collected for one purpose (such as water, gas tax, grants, or development fees) may only be used for that specific purpose.
In practical terms, the City’s cash pool operates like a collection of labeled envelopes rather than a single checking account.
x Most funds already have assigned jobs (infrastructure projects, utility operations, debt payments, grants, and emergency reserves).
x Only a portion of the total represents flexible General Fund resources used for core services like police, public works, development, parks, and libraries. x Fund accounting can feel unusual and overly complex, but it exists to ensure transparency, legal compliance, fiscal stability, and protection of taxpayer dollars.
It’s One Vault, But Many ‘Envelopes’
The $125 million is pooled together for investment purposes (to maximize interest earnings).
Internally, it is divided into separate funds, each with its own legal purpose.
Think of it like having a mortgage account, a college fund, a car repair fund, and a ‘don’t touch or the auditors (IRS in personal/business world) will appear’ fund — all at the same bank. Many dollars are legally restricted:
Ȉ Gas tax revenue – Must be used for streets and transportation.
Ȉ Water fees – Must be used for water systems.
Ȉ Risk management funds – Must be used for future liabilities.
Ȉ Grant funds – Must be used exactly as specified by the grant.
Ȉ Debt proceeds – Must be used for legally approved projects.
Using these funds for anything else is not just discouraged — it is illegal.
Some Money Is Already Spoken For
Ȉ Funds may already be committed to contracts approved by the City Council.
Ȉ Capital projects underway have funding set aside.
Ȉ Required reserves must be maintained for financial stability.
Ȉ Some balances represent liabilities already owed (pensions, invoices, deposits).
Cities Must Maintain Reserves
Ȉ Emergencies, natural disasters, and economic downturns happen.
Ȉ Maintaining reserves protects the City’s credit rating.
Ȉ Strong reserves help avoid sudden service cuts or tax increases.
Attachment C (Cash and Investment Pool Explained)
Spending reserves simply because cash exists would be like spending your emergency savings because your checking account looks full. Likewise, a full checkbook does not indicate cash/savings exists or are available to be spent.
Why Fund Accounting Feels So Confusing
Ȉ Businesses focus on profit.
Ȉ Families can focus on cash flow and savings.
Ȉ Governments focus on legal purpose and public accountability.
Instead of one checking account, cities manage dozens of funds that must balance independently. It may feel rigid, but this structure ensures transparency, accountability, and compliance with law.
What Is Actually Flexible?
Only a portion of the total cash pool represents General Fund dollars that can support core services such as:
x Police
x Parks
x Library
x Development
x General City operations
Even those funds must cover ongoing operational costs, not one-time wish lists.
Timing Matters: Revenues and Expenses Don’t Arrive Together Another important piece of the puzzle is timing. The City operates year-round, but revenues do not all arrive evenly throughout the year.
x Property tax revenue is typically received in installments (primarily December and April). x Sales tax receipts are received monthly but based on prior activity. x Grant funds are often reimbursed after the City has already spent the money. x Utility revenues fluctuate based on usage and billing cycles.
This means the City must carefully manage cash flow to ensure bills, payroll, and contract payments are made on time, even when major revenues have not yet arrived.
In many cases, especially with state and federal grants, the City must front the money for a project and then submit documentation to receive reimbursement. So, while a grant may be awarded for a project, the cash almost never arrives before the expenses occur.
Due to these timing differences, maintaining adequate cash balances is critical. The presence of cash in the investment pool does not mean the funds are surplus, it often means the City is responsibly managing timing differences between when money is received and when it must be spent.
Attachment C (Cash and Investment Pool Explained)
Bottom Line
When you hear that the City has $125 million in the bank, it does not mean the City has $125 million available for discretionary spending.
It means the City responsibly manages multiple legally restricted and purpose-driven funds, which have timing challenges with revenues and expenses, in an organized, accountable, and carefully monitored way to protect the community’s financial stability.
Attachment D (Budget Explained)
City of Glendora
Where Does the $125 Million Go?
(And Why We Can’t Just Spend It on Whatever We Want)
How Glendora Actually Builds a Budget (Hint: It’s Not Guesswork) Before we talk about funding sources, restrictions, and why we can’t repave every street tomorrow, it’s important to understand Glendora does not budget one year at a time and hope for the best. Sound financial management requires:
x Multi-year financial planning
x Ongoing financial monitoring
x Frequent financial reporting
x Prompt corrective action when necessary
x Long-term financial health strategies
In other words, we do not steer the City by looking only through the rearview mirror.
Glendora adopts a two-year budget to provide greater certainty for the City Council, departments, employees, and the public regarding ongoing funding and staffing for programs and services.
Even more importantly, we include a Five-Year Financial Projection for:
x The General Fund
x Measures E/Z
x The Water Fund(s)
This allows the City to evaluate the long-term impact of policy decisions during the budget process. If a decision creates structural imbalance three years from now, we see it coming. And ideally, we fix it before it becomes tomorrow’s headline.
Layered on top of that are our guiding documents, which include but are not limited to:
x Community Surveys
x City Council Strategic Plans
x Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
x Parks Master Plan
x Water Master Plan
Policy sets direction. Data sets priorities. The budget follows both.
The approximately $125 million annual budget is not a wish list. It is a structured financial response to adopted goals, infrastructure needs, and legal requirements. What gets funded, gets done.
Attachment D (Budget Explained)
Why We Can’t Just Spend $125 Million on Anything We Want When people hear '$125 million budget,' it can sound like a very large, very flexible piggy bank.
It is not.
The City operates roughly 60 separate funds divided into six major fund types.
Think of the budget as one vault filled with dozens of labeled envelopes. Each envelope has a name, a job, and in many cases, a very strict set of rules.
Gas tax must be used for streets. Water fees must stay in water. Grant funds must follow grant rules. Debt must be paid on schedule.
Using restricted funds for unrelated purposes is not creative budgeting, it is illegal. And auditors do not accept 'but it seemed like a good idea at the time.' The City would know, we get audited by 10+ agencies on an annual basis.
The Six Fund Types (Also Known as The Envelopes)
1. General Fund, Measures E/Z and GUSD JUA – The Flexible Ones (Sort Of) The General Fund supports police, parks, the library, public works operations, administration, and community development.
It represents approximately 45% of the City’s total annual budget, or roughly $56.5 million of the $125 million total.
It is the most flexible fund — but even it is largely committed to ongoing expenses such as employees, contracts, and services to the community. The Police Department, Public Works Department and Community and Economic Development comprise approximately65% of the General Fund.
So yes, it is flexible. But it is also very, very busy.
2. Special Revenue Funds – The Rule Followers
Restricted by State law, Federal law, local ordinance, or voter approval, these funds must be used only for specific purposes such as transportation, grants, or development-related infrastructure.
They represent approximately $15.9 million, or 13% of the total budget.
They are not available for general operations — no matter how compelling the proposal.
3. Capital Project Funds – The Builders
Attachment D (Budget Explained)
Dedicated to long-term infrastructure improvements and major projects.
These funds help ensure we invest today without undermining tomorrow’s operating stability.
4. Debt Service Funds – The Bill Payers
Used exclusively to repay bond obligations and capital lease agreements.
Debt payments are contractual commitments. They are not optional. They are not flexible. They are simply due.
5. Enterprise Fund (Water) – The Utility Business
Funded by water rates and legally restricted to water operations and infrastructure.
The Water Fund represents approximately $31.4 million, or 25% of the total annual budget.
Water customers pay for water, not for everything else.
6. Internal Service Funds – The Behind-the-Scenes Team
Support internal operations such as insurance, technology, and fleet management.
They may not get headlines, but without them, things break — both literally and financially.
Bottom Line
The City does not have $125 million available for discretionary spending.
It manages a system of legally restricted, contractually obligated, purpose-driven funds. We are guided by multi-year planning, ongoing monitoring, and long-term financial strategies.
Fund accounting may feel rigid. That is intentional.
It protects taxpayers, preserves infrastructure, supports responsible planning, and ensures today’s decisions do not become tomorrow’s financial problem.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: March 24, 2026
FROM: City Manager DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Information on Citizen Ad-Hoc Committees, City Council Sub-Committees, and Direction on the Use of One-Time Funds
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Receive a report on citizen ad-hoc committees and city council sub-committees and provide direction, as necessary; and
2. Provide direction, as necessary, on the use of one-time funds.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 3 - New + Revitalized Facilities
Goal 4 - Sustainable Infrastructure
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the January 13, 2026 City Council meeting, staff committed to returning with a broader discussion regarding the potential use of one-time resources as part of the FY 2025-26 mid-year budget update. On February 24, 2026, the City Council received a report on available one-time funding and discussed potential approaches for evaluating future capital needs and funding priorities. During the discussion, the Council considered the possibility of establishing either a citizen ad-hoc advisory group or a City Council subcommittee to further examine facility and infrastructure needs and related funding strategies. The Council ultimately voted to receive and file the report and directed staff to return with additional information regarding how such a group might be structured and what policy questions the Council may wish to consider.
This report provides background information to assist the City Council in evaluating whether to establish a citizen advisory body or a City Council subcommittee to review facility and infrastructure issues. It outlines how citizen advisory groups typically function, summarizes past examples of similar advisory committees established by the City, and provides examples from other cities that have used advisory groups to study civic facilities and infrastructure planning. The report also presents several policy considerations for the City Council related to governance structure, potential membership qualifications, and the scope of work should the Council choose to establish a group to further evaluate the City’s facilities, infrastructure needs, and potential use of one-time funding.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
At the January 13, 2026 City Council meeting, during a comprehensive city facility and civic center discussion, staff committed to returning to the City Council with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources with the mid-year budget update for FY 2025-26.
On February 24, 2026, the City Council received a report on one-time funding. During City Council discussion following the presentation, the City Council discussed the possibility to creating a citizen ad-hoc or city council subcommittee to discuss capital related matters. Ultimately, the City Council moved to receive and file the report on one-time funding and staff pledged to return to City Council with an item on a possible capital improvement adhoc/sub-committee on March 24, 2026.
DISCUSSION
On February 24, 2026, in response to direction form the City Council in January 2026, staff presented a report on one-time funding. The City Council did not provide direction for the use of one-time funding; a copy of the staff report and all exhibits can be found at Attachment A.
Additionally, during the City Council discussion that followed the presentation on one-time funding, the City Council discussed the possibility to creating a citizen ad-hoc or city council sub-committee to discuss facility and infrastructure related matters. Ultimately, the City Council moved to receive and file the report on one-time funding and staff pledged to return to City Council with an item on how a city council sub-committee or citizen ad-hoc group may operate and what policy questions the City Council may wish to consider.
This report provides a general overview of citizen ad-hoc groups and city council sub-committees, including prior City Council actions on these matters over the past ten years. Additionally, the report will include policy questions/direction the City Council may need to address in order to move forward with use of one-time funds, or the establishment of group to further study the City's facilities/infrastructure and related funding challenges.
What Are Citizen Advisory/Ad-Hoc Groups in Cities?
Citizen advisory groups (often called advisory boards, commissions, ad-hoc committees, or task forces) are bodies composed primarily of residents that:
Study specific issues or policy areas;
Gather input, research, and community feedback;
Provide recommendations to the City Council (or staff) on policies, plans, or programs; and Do not have significant decision-making authority; they are advisory in nature, not legislative.
These groups vary widely in scope. Currently, the City has several ongoing committees/boards including the Planning Commission, Water Commission, Library Board, Recreations and Human Services Commission, and the Business Improvement District Board.
Can Council Members Serve on Citizen Advisory Bodies?
As a general rule, council members cannot serve as voting members or active participants of advisory boards, commissions, or committees that are appointed by the City Council. This is to avoid conflicts with the City Council’s role in policy making and oversight. Advisory groups exist to provide independent advice. Allowing city council members to vote would blur the line between legislative policy decision-making (Council) and citizen advisory input.
While not common, some cities have appointed city council liaison(s) for citizen advisory boards, commissions, task forces, etc. including, but not limited to, San Ramon, Dublin, and Beverly Hills. In these cities, appointment of a liaison is done in conjunction with other City Council assignments.
Has the City Council Previously Appointed a Citizen Advisory Body Outside of the City’s Standing Board and Commissions?
From time to time, the City Council has appointed various citizen advisory committees/groups. The establishment of these groups requires significant staff resources in order to provide the information and support necessary. Over the past ten years, the City Council has created two such citizen advisory groups, including a citizen ad-hoc committee on revenue and expenditures and an ad-hoc citizen advisory group on antique streetlights.
Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee: Revenue Options and Expenditures (April 2018 through December 2020) During a strategic planning workshop on January 25, 2018, the City Council and Executive Team discussed the ongoing concern that current revenue sources and longer-term projections would not keep pace with the anticipated expenditure trends. It was anticipated the City would begin experiencing multi-million dollar shortfalls in FY 2018-19 and beyond.
As part of the discussion, the City Council discussed the possibility of seeking community input by the creation of a citizen’s advisory panel; it was established that then Mayor Thompson and former Council Member Nelson would explore the issue further. On April 10, 2018, then Mayor Thompson and former Council Member Nelson formally presented an agenda item recommending the creation of an ad-hoc citizen’s advisory committee to evaluate the following:
Why there may be a [revenue] problem.
How and/or what might be recommended to create new revenue sources.
Are there other ways to address the "problem."
It was recommended that the committee be comprised of between 15-21 persons with a diverse background; however, a financial background, especially with public entities should be highly valued. The ad-hoc group was open to city residents and city business owners, the vast majority of the appointments were ultimately residents.
Each city council member appointed two members to the panel. The remaining seats of the panel were selected similar to the appointment process for the City's commissions/boards. Additionally, the Council determined that the citizen ad-hoc committee would have an appointed chair and vice-chair; the primary staff liaison was the Finance Director and Community Development Director.
On May 16, 2018, 20 members were appointed to the Ad-Hoc Citizen’s Advisory Committee by the City Council; Michael Holmes was appointed as the Committee Chair and Cliff Hamlow was appointed the Vice-Chair.
The first meeting was held on June 7, 2018. The group met approximately twice per month through early September 2018. Based upon information gathered, the committee was unanimous in its decision to present a preliminary report to the city council on September 11, 2018, recommending that the City should immediately take steps to conduct a special election for a sales and use tax initiative in November 2018. A final report was delivered to the City Council in November 2019.
On December 8, 2020, the City Council held a follow-up agenda item on the November 2019 Final Report as part of the City’s 2020-2023 Strategic Plan. The final report included, but was not limited to historical staffing levels, outsourcing opportunities, land sales, and revenue measures. The ad-hoc committee was comprehensive in its efforts to understand and address the City's current and historical funding challenges; several of the additional items in the report (e.g. San Jose, South Hills, and outsourcing) have been topics of conversation and action since the issuance of the report in 2019. The City Council noted the option for the group to be reengaged, if needed in the future. A copy of the Final Report from November 2019, can be found at Attachment B.
Ad-Hoc Antique Streetlights Citizen Committee (May 2022 through June 2023) On May 10, 2022, the City Council authorized staff to develop an ad-hoc process for a group of no more than 11 people to begin a feasibility dialogue around the restoration of the City’s antique streetlights. Additionally, the group was tasked with the creation of an antique streetlight maintenance assessment district. To assist the process and formation of an assessment district, the City Council authorized staff to engage an engineering firm, bringing the total funded project budget to $1,629,950 ($1,500,000 from Senator Portantino and $129,650 in discretionary capital funds).
On June 14, 2022, the City Council discussed and approved the creation of an Ad-Hoc Antique Streetlight Citizen’s Advisory Panel (Ad-Hoc Panel), with a mission to:
“Engage residents in a dialogue to determine the interest and feasibility of renovating the antique streetlights, and potential support for the creation of an antique streetlight maintenance assessment district.” On August 23, 2022, the City Council appointed nine applicants as members of the Ad-Hoc Antique Streetlight Citizen’s Advisory Panel, directed that one seat would be open for a representative from the Glendora Historical Society, and appointed Patrick Hollanders as Chair (with direction to have the Vice Chair chosen by the ad-hoc committee).
The ad-hoc committee met on six occasions in 2022 (September 8 and 29, October 20, November 10, and December 1 and 21). Each of the Ad-Hoc Antique Street Light's meetings was open to the public, broadcast virtually (via Zoom), with agendas and supporting materials published to a project webpage created on the City’s website. The webpage also included information on the schedule of meetings, historical information on the antique streetlights, the timeline of City Council actions related to the antique streetlights, as well as responses to the questions posed by members of the ad-hoc committee.
On January 24, 2023, the City Council was provided an update on the antique streetlight project, which included testimony and recommendations of the Ad-Hoc Antique Streetlight Citizen Committee. After debate, the City Council directed staff to re-evaluate the project, meet with the City’s consultants and past bidders, look at timelines, and come back to the City Council with possible options moving forward.
On March 28, 2023, the City Council directed staff to move forward with the formation of the antique streetlight district during the current fiscal year. In order to stay within the $100 to $200 per year recommendation of the adhoc committee for the first two or three years, the project required a General Fund or Measure E/Z loan to the proposed district for approximately $601,000 at 0% interest over 30-years; this was on top of the $1.63 million the City already allocated to the project.
On April 11, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution to call for a vote on the establishment of an antique streetlight district and confirmed that if the vote failed, the antique streetlights would be removed. The vote occurred on June 13, 2023, with 65% of the vote opposing the establishment of a new district. This was the third failure to establish a district, following up on efforts in 2007 and 2008.
Ultimately, the antique streetlights were removed in 2023. In subsequent years, utilizing funds already set aside for the antique streetlights, staff has worked to salvage and refurbish as many lights as possible for use in a future project along Glendora Avenue (Foothills to the A-Line station).
Can Council Members serve on a City Council Ah-Hoc Committee? The City Council may form sub-committees or sub-groups that include one or two council members at the City Council’s direction. In order to avoid Brown Act violations, no more than two council members can serve on a city council ad-hoc committee at one time.
Note that an ad-hoc committee is differentiated from a standing committee, in that it is not permanent, but rather temporary, formed to address a specific short term task or project, and dissolves once the issue is addressed or completed.
Has the City Council Previously Appointed a Council Sub-Committee? The City Council recently appointed Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Councilmember Allawos to a sub-committee that focused on the 1762 Dale Rd. affordable housing project with Mercy Housing. The group was appointed in mid 2025 and provided their insight to the City Council in early 2026. Meeting cadence for both council members, staff and Mercy Housing, was typically monthly.
The City Council used the sub-committees insight during project negotiations associated with the exclusive negotiating agreement (ENA) with Mercy (Phase 1). This insight assisted with the City Council’s direction on the project, funding options, housing mix, and community engagement. This included visiting other Mercy developments and participating in community meetings. Staff anticipates the Mercy Housing project at 1762 Dale will continue moving through the development process, with hearing at the Planning Commission and City Council over the next 12-18 months.
Examples of Citizen Advisory Groups Focused on Facilities & Infrastructure Generally, cities that appoint limited duration citizen ad-hoc or city council sub-committees do so for reasons unique to each City. While topics may be consistent across certain cities (e.g., pensions, infrastructure, etc.), the issues cities face are often as unique as the cities themselves. Below are two examples of cities that have established advisory groups to assist cities with civic centers and city facilities.
Rancho Palos Verdes – Civic Center Advisory Committee
The Rancho Palos Verdes Civic Center Advisory Committee (CCAC) was created by the City Council in March 2017 to help guide development of a long-term plan for the City’s Civic Center campus at Upper Point Vicente Park. The seven member committee was formed following a 2016 citywide survey that showed resident interest in improving or redeveloping the aging civic facilities. Comprised of resident appointees serving in an advisory role, the CCAC provides recommendations to the City Council on the design, program, and financial considerations associated with redevelopment of the Civic Center site.
The committee generally meets monthly in public meetings (which generally adhere to Brown Act regulations), where members review conceptual designs, evaluate potential civic and community facilities, and discuss financing and implementation strategies. Meetings often include presentations from consultants and staff, along with opportunities for public input and community engagement. Through these meetings and workshops, the CCAC helped shape the proposed program and layout for a redeveloped Civic Center campus, including City Hall facilities, community spaces, and park amenities. The City Council approved the Civic Center Master Plan program framework in October 2019, establishing the foundation for future design and implementation.
The Civic Center project faces several ongoing challenges and policy considerations. The existing civic buildings date largely to the 1950s Nike missile site, creating issues related to aging infrastructure, ADA compliance, and functional limitations for modern municipal operations. At the same time, the City must balance community expectations for new civic and recreational amenities with the financial realities of a major capital project, including funding strategies, project scope, and potential phasing. Determining an affordable and achievable redevelopment plan while maintaining public support remains the central issue for the committee and City Council as planning continues.
Hermosa Beach – Civic Facilities Project Advisory Group The Hermosa Beach Civic Facilities Project Advisory Group was formed by the City Council in February 2024 to assist the City Manager in evaluating options for addressing the City’s aging municipal facilities. The group was established after the Council identified significant concerns with the condition and functionality of several civic facilities, including City Hall, the Police Department building, and the Public Works maintenance yard. The advisory group’s role was to review facility needs, analyze potential redevelopment options, and provide strategic guidance to the City Manager and City Council on possible approaches to replacing or renovating the City’s civic infrastructure.
The group consisted of approximately a dozen volunteer community members selected by the City Manager for their professional experience in areas such as municipal management, construction, engineering, finance, planning, and community leadership. Rather than forming a formal Brown Act committee, the City structured the advisory group as an informal working group, allowing members to collaborate and review technical information outside of traditional public meeting requirements. The advisory group met several times over the course of roughly eight months, during which members reviewed prior facility assessments, toured existing civic buildings, evaluated operational needs, and discussed financing strategies and potential redevelopment scenarios.
Through this process, the advisory group developed several key recommendations for the City Council. The group concluded that replacement of the Public Works maintenance yard should be the City’s highest near-term priority, citing operational limitations and safety concerns at the existing facility. For the broader civic campus, the group identified several potential approaches, including renovating and expanding existing facilities, constructing a new consolidated civic center at a different site, or pursuing a phased hybrid approach that would combine renovation with selective new construction. The group also recommended that the City pursue one major civic facilities project at a time and continue additional cost analysis and community outreach before making final decisions on long-term civic center redevelopment.
Draft City Council Policy Considerations
Historically, the City Council has provided specific direction to citizen ad-hoc committees and City Council subcommittees to review and provide recommendations to the City Council. If established, the work plan, and financial guardrails of such a group will determine the amount of staff resources, use of consultants, and timeline. In order to assist the City Council with discussion on this topic, staff have developed a list of draft policy considerations for the City Council (Attachment C).
The draft decision matrix is organized by policy question. Each policy questions is broken down by options for City Council consideration and what implications those options have on the policy directive to staff. Below is an excerpt from the decision matrix that may be used by the City Council:
Step Policy Question Options for Council Consideration Policy Implicatio 1 Does the City Council wish to
establish a group to study the City’s
facilities and/or infrastructure needs?
A. Yes – establish a review group
B. No – continue review through regular
and additional Council meetings
C. Combination – City Council makes
certain decisions now and established a
review group to study specific
issues/topics
Establishing a group may allow
analysis and community input
the timeline. Handling within C
maintains speed and direct po
The City Council may also est
workshop schedule to discuss
item (e.g., every third Tuesday
month).
2 If yes, what structure should the group
have?
A. Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee
B. City Council Subcommittee
C. Combination – Citizen Ad-Hoc
Committee with City Council liaison(s)
Citizen Committee may increa
engagement and provide addi
technical input.
City Council Subcommittee al
direct Council oversight and fa
coordination with staff. A Cou
Subcommittee could meet wit
from time to time to solicit inpu
recommendations.
2A If Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee: What
qualifications should applicants
possess?
Experience in:
• Large-scale infrastructure projects
• Public Contracts / Prevailing Wage
• Transportation / streets
• Engineering or construction management
• Finance / capital planning
• Project management
• Community representation
Establishing qualifications ens
expertise while maintaining co
representation.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendations in this report. As City Council direction on the use of one-time funds is provided, staff will evaluate the fiscal impact of each policy decision on the City. Generally, impacts from the use of one-time funding are:
Limited operational flexibility during future economic downturns (impacts on service delivery); Diminished ability to address one-time infrastructure issues; and Downgrade of bond rating (increased borrowing costs).
If the City Council moves forward with a city council sub-committee or a citizen ad-hoc committee, fiscal impacts associated with staff time, consultants, etc. will be contingent upon the work plan set by the City Council.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There are no CEQA impacts associated with the recommendations in this report.
Prepared By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Moises Lopez, Assistant City Manager
Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_February_24_2026_Staff_Report_and_Attachments.pdf
B. Final Citizens Ad Hoc Committee Report 2019.pdf
C. City Council Decision Matrix_Facilities Committee.pdf D_Presentation.pdf
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: February 24, 2026
FROM: City Manager DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Use of One-Time Funds
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Receive an overview on one-time funding opportunities; and
2. Provide direction, as needed.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 3 - New + Revitalized Facilities
Goal 4 - Sustainable Infrastructure
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Over the past decade, Glendora restored its financial stability by addressing a $3–$4 million structural deficit through voter-approved sales tax measures, pension restructuring, and stronger reserve and capital funding policies. These reforms earned the City a AAA bond rating and enabled targeted investments in infrastructure, public safety, and homelessness response aligned with community priorities. With the recent passage of Measure Z and a continued focus on long-term planning, the City remains committed to fiscal discipline while carefully balancing limited resources against ongoing service and infrastructure needs.
At the January 13, 2026, staff committed to returning to the City Council with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources during or after the mid-year budget update. This discussion will outline existing one-time funds, document how the City has prepared for future fiscal challenges, and provide examples of how those funds could be utilized. For the past seven years, the City Council has supported a transparent, policy driven dialogue that reflects the City Council’s continued commitment to thoughtful decision making and its ongoing work alongside staff to strengthen Glendora's financial foundation, address decades of differed maintenance, and improve the community for years to come.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
At the January 13, 2026, staff committed to returning to the City Council with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources during or after the mid-year budget update.
On February 24, 2026, the City Council received the FY 2025-2026, mid-year budget update (same meeting this this agenda item).
DISCUSSION
During the city facility and infrastructure discussion on January 13, 2026, staff committed to returning to the City Council with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources in concert with the mid-year budget update. This discussion will outline existing one-time funds, provide context on how the City has prepared for future fiscal challenges, and provide examples of how those funds could be utilized. These examples, will represent policy decisions/direction of the City Council.
For the better part of a decade, the City of Glendora has undertaken a deliberate and disciplined transformation of its fiscal policies, allowing the City to confront long-standing challenges, while positioning the organization for longterm stability. In fiscal years 2017-18 and 2018-19, the City projected General Fund deficits exceeding $1 million annually. As leadership transitioned and deeper analysis was conducted, it became clear that the structural imbalance was far more significant, at closer to $3–$4 million per year. Recognizing the seriousness of the situation, the City had already convened a citizen advisory committee to evaluate paths to financial sustainability, including land sales, operational efficiencies, service reductions, outsourcing and potential revenue enhancements.
The committee ultimately recommended that the City Council place a local sales tax measure on the ballot. While the typical local measure is 1.0%, Los Angeles County’s Measure H had already claimed 0.25%, limiting the City’s available rate. In 2019, the City Council placed Measure E, a 0.75% sales tax, before the voters, and the measure was approved. Concurrently, the City issued a Pension Obligation Bond (POB), generating annual savings of more than $1 million and significantly improving long-term pension cost predictability.
With the passage of Measure E and the issuance of the POB, the City Council directed staff to modernize Glendora’s fiscal framework. Updated fiscal policies were adopted that aligned with the City’s strategic plan and reflected a commitment to weathering an uncertain economic future. These changes included strengthening the General Fund Reserve, establishing a discretionary capital projects fund/reserve, shoring up internal service funds (e.g. Fleet, Technology, etc.) and intentionally setting aside resources for future pension obligations. Together, these policies represented foundational change by acknowledging both the scale of past under-investment and the need for sustained discipline in future years to address infrastructure demands, service expectations, and the uncertain fiscal landscape in California. These foundational changes would allow the City time to make significant policy decisions during recessions without immediate impacts to services, and the possibility to address certain facility needs during emergencies.
The results of this fiscal stewardship have been significant. Glendora earned an AAA bond rating for its General Fund, an achievement shared by fewer than 20 cities statewide, validating the City Council’s long-term approach to financial governance. In the years that followed, the City continued its stewardship of taxpayer money. The City made significant investments in technology and modernized its operations, eliminating duplicative functions, restructuring departments to better serve the public, and expanding strategic use of the private sector in hard to recruit service areas. At the same time, the City undertook comprehensive assessments of its infrastructure systems, including water, parks/trails, trees, streets, facilities, and technology (infrastructure studies).
Guided by the principle that “what gets funded gets done,” the City has relied on scientifically valid community surveys, foundational infrastructure studies, and City Council direction to shape multi-year strategic plans. These plans are directly integrated into the annual budget and departmental work programs, ensuring alignment between community priorities, fiscal decisions, and staff efforts. The outcomes have been measurable and, in many respects, historic. For the first time in decades, overall street conditions improved from one decade to the next, albeit minimal. Chronic vacancy challenges have been mitigated, with targeted investments in public safety, recreation and human services, public works, and water—each directly tied to community quality of life and safety concerns.
Nowhere is this philosophy more evident than in the City’s recent investments in public safety and homelessness response. Community feedback consistently identified emergency responsiveness, neighborhood safety, and visible homelessness impacts as top priorities. In response, the City Council made intentional, ongoing investments in people and systems. These investments include additional sworn police officers, added dispatch personnel to improve response times, enhanced emergency operations and preparedness capacity, and the creation and expansion of a Community Impact Team focused on proactive engagement and community problem solving.
The City has also increased funding for service providers and regional partnerships to address homelessness through outreach, case management, and supportive services, enforcement, and clean-up. Together, these investments reflect a shift from reactive responses to a more coordinated, data informed, and professional approach aligned with community expectations.
Despite this progress, significant challenges remain. The impacts of homelessness, increasing state mandates, loss of local control, insurance, and the absence of a permanent funding source for capital improvements continue to place pressure on City finances. While Glendora has made generational investments in infrastructure over the past five to seven years, decades of under-investment cannot be reversed overnight. These efforts have been strengthened by the successful pursuit of tens of millions of dollars in grants and state and federal appropriations, supporting projects ranging from parks and first/last-mile improvements to school site traffic safety and signalized intersections.
Recognizing the importance of keeping local dollars local, the City Council placed Measure Z on the November 2024 ballot, a 0.25% sales tax measure designed to preserve local revenue capacity and offset prior countywide tax measures. Glendorans understood and supported this need, with affirmative election results materially above those of Measure E. Measure Z reflects the City Council’s continued commitment to fiscal sustainability and local control, by keeping funds local and ensuring that Glendora remains positioned to fund essential services and community priorities in an increasingly constrained fiscal environment.
That same forward looking mindset is reflected in the City’s current Strategic Plan, adopted in early 2025. The plan continues to direct staff to actively pursue additional and diversified revenue opportunities, including potential development in the South Hills area, strategic economic development investments, and redevelopment opportunities at underutilized sites owned by other governmental agencies and the City itself. Many of these actions were originally recommended to the City Council during the citizen committee meetings in 2018 and 2019.
These efforts underscore the ongoing work of the City Council and staff to responsibly grow the City’s revenue base while remaining consistent with the City Council's other long-term planning goals.
Due to the City's fiscal reforms, the City has some capacity to consider one-time investments; resources that would not exist without the foundational changes made years earlier. However, these same resources are needed to address competing priorities, including streets, parks, city facilities and long-term financial resilience.
Discretionary One-Time Funding Breakdown
The General Fund, Pension Stabilization Fund, Measures E/Z Fund, GUSD JUA Fund, and Capital Projects Fund are discretionary funding sources for the City. Staff evaluated each fund, taking note of:
Fund balance/ reserve levels;
Ability of re-prioritization of capital projects;
One-time funding from property sales;
Future development opportunities of other local agencies; and Options for strategic use of amounts set aside for pension and other post-employment benefit costs.
Attachment A to this report provides a detailed analysis of one-time funding opportunities. The report is broken down by two-year budget cycle (FY 2025-2027, FY 2027-2029, and FY 2029-2031) and by major category (e.g. fund balance/reserves, reallocation of CIP, property development, pension/OPEB reserves, etc.).
Available Fund Balance/Use of Reserves
Currently, the City has approximately $18.3 million in the General Fund Reserve. The General Fund reserve policy requires a minimum of 30% to maximum of 45% of prior year operational expenditures; currently the City maintains a 40% reserve level. The reserve policy range represents the ability to fund approximately 3 to 6 months of General Fund operations in the absence of any other revenue received. The amount of General Fund reserve in excess of the minimum (30%) is approximately $4.58 million. In addition to the General Fund, the City's has an estimated $2.28 million in fund balance in the Measures E/Z fund that can be used for discretionary purposes.
During the FY 2027-2029 and FY 2029-2031 two year budget cycles, staff anticipates additional Measures E/Z fund balance of $569,000 and $260,000 respectively.
The use of General Fund reserves and Measures E/Z fund balance can impact the City's bond rating and operational flexibility during an economic downturn. Without reserves at certain levels, future borrowing costs may be higher and the City may have to look at more immediate/significant service cuts to the community in lieu of targeted use of reserves during major emergencies or economic downturns. Ample reserves allows the City Council time to make targeted, policy oriented service reductions when needed.
Reallocation of CIP
Staff has identified an opportunity for the City Council to reallocate approximately $1.9 million of existing projects to other priorities, if needed. Currently, the City's discretionary capital projects fund has approximately $1 million in projects aimed at the civic center (e.g. Council chamber remodel/expansion, civic center roofing, etc.).
The City and Glendora Unified School District (GUSD) have a long history of partnering on community assets (e.g. middle school parks, high school pool, etc.). GUSD has a current pool renovation project, in which the City has contributed $600,000 to the $4 million dollar project. Additionally, the City Council approved an additional contribution of up to $900,000 that is dependent on the City's financial performance through June 30, 2027.
As the City's civic center project is not underway and the GUSD pool project came in under budget ($5.8 million down to $4 million), funding may be reallocated. The City Council may also want to explore the use of the $900,000 pool project funding, to leverage the recent $1.2 million federal appropriate the City helped GUSD secure for the Sandburg Middle School track and lighting project. The future project area at Sandburg Middle School operates as a City park after 4pm.
Disposition/Sale of City Owned Properties
The sale of the San Jose site provided the City with $3.99 million. The City Council previously allocated $1 million of these proceeds to achieve initiatives in the City's strategic and economic development action plans (8/27/2024), leaving $2.99 million for future use. Additionally, staff anticipates an estimated $2.1 million to be received by June 30, 2027 for the sale of the Dale site. This funding will be dependent upon approval of a development in accordance with the City's standards and actions by the Planning Commission and City Council.
With the sale of San Jose and Dale project sites, staff anticipates a total of approximately $5.1 million available within the next 16 months, with approximately $3 million available now.
Pension/OPEB Reserves
Through the direction and approval of the City Council, staff have set up Section 115 Trusts and Reserves for future pension liabilities, including CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL), future pension obligation bond (POB) payments, and
Below is a summary of the totals included on Attachment A and described above.
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle
Totals
FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31
Available Fund
Balance/Reserves $ 6,860,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000
Reallocation of CIP $ 1,900,000 $ - $ -
Property Sales $ 5,120,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
Pension Set Aside $ 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000
OPEB Set Aside $ 4,080,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000
Grand Totals $ 31,780,000 $ 4,889,000 $ 4,500,000
Future Policy Considerations
Due to the City's fiscal reforms, over the past seven years the City has created capacity to consider one-time investments; resources that would not exist without the foundational changes made years earlier. However, these same resources are needed to address competing priorities, including streets, parks, city facilities and long-term financial resilience. The City's current strategic plan includes action items to quantify facility needs and identify funding opportunities for streets and city facilities. Below are examples of policy areas the City Council may need to take into consideration when discussing one-time use of discretionary funds:
Strategic use of one-time funds for street improvements to bridge existing gap of $3-3.5 million to raise PCI from a 63 to a 70 over the next seven years.
Possible targeted use of one-time funds now, back-filled with future funding opportunities (e.g. sale of property, development of local agency owned property). This policy direction could be used for either streets or city facilities.
Pay-down of future POB obligations in 2029 to free up $1.5 million in cash flow savings that could be used for another priority (e.g. streets).
Prioritization of city facility needs (e.g. public works yard, library, roofing needs, etc.).
Impacts on operational flexibility and services to the community during economic downturns, without ability to use general fund or pension reserves.
Impacts on future liabilities with more or less funding for street/sidewalk projects.
Impacts of bond ratings and future borrowing costs with the use of reserves.
The City Council is well versed in the need to utilize one-time funding in the most efficient manner possible. For example, in May 2023, the City Council received a report estimating approximately $8 million in needs, subject to further study (e.g. waterproofing, footings, etc.), for moderate repairs to the Library, including plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and structural upgrades. When a potential grant opportunity requiring a significant City match of up to $4 million was ultimately unavailable, the City Council and Library Board unanimously concluded that committing $8–$10+ million for a repair project with no guarantee of resolving underlying facility issues was not the most prudent course at that time. This decision was not a reflection of the Library’s importance, but rather an example of the careful fiscal policy trade-offs required when limited resources must address multiple critical needs. As the City reviews the opportunities and costs for a significant civic center renovation aimed to address decades of issues for future generations of Glendorans, the City Council has continued to evaluate the needs of many infrastructure challenges, including streets, the Library and the City's public works yard - the use of one-time funding will assist with that analysis.
Other Financial Information
This report focuses on the use of one-time discretionary funding sources. In full acknowledgment that governmental or "fund" accounting can be difficult to understand, staff developed two additional attachments to this report. Attachment C covers the City's investment portfolio and Attachment D addresses how the various city funding sources must be used. As always, the goal is to provide information to those who would like to educate themselves on City finances in the most transparent and easy to understand method possible.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendations in this report. As City Council direction on the use of one-time funds is provided, staff will evaluate the fiscal impact of each policy decision on the City. Generally, impacts from the use of one-time funding are:
Limited operational flexibility during future economic downturns (impacts on service delivery); Diminished ability to address one-time infrastructure issues; Downgrade of bond rating (increased borrowing costs);
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There is no CEQA impacts associated with the recommendations in this report.
Prepared By: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Marie Ricci, Deputy City Manager
Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_Discretionary_One-time_Funding_FINAL.pdf
B. Presentation.pdf
C_Cash_and_Investment_Pool_Explained_FINAL.pdf
D_Budget_Explained_FINAL.pdf
Anticiapted One-Time Discretionary Funding Opportunities Attachment A FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund
Balance/Reserve $ 569,000 6,860,000 $ $ 260,000
In Excess of Policy 1 $ 569,000 2,280,000 $ 260,000 $
45%
30% $ 4,580,000
Reallocation of CIP $ - 1,900,000 $ - $
Reprioritization of Projects $ 1,000,000
GUSD Pool 2 $ 900,000
Property Sales $ 4,000,000 5,120,000 $ 4,000,000 $
San Jose 3 $ 2,990,000
Dale 4 $ 2,130,000
Other Local Agency
Development 5 $ 4,000,000 4,000,000 $
Pension Set Aside $ 240,000 13,820,000 $ 180,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6 $ 6,090,000
Reserve 7 $ 240,000 7,730,000 $ 180,000 $
OPEB Set Aside $ 80,000 4,080,000 $ 60,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6 $ 2,060,000
Reserve 7 $ 80,000 2,020,000 $ 60,000 $
Grand Totals $ 4,080,000 13,780,000 $ 4,060,000 $ 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000 $ 2,280,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 31,780,000 $ 4,889,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 These funds are generally restricted. Currently, these funds have been set aside for investment in the Section 115 Trusts as cash on hand/liquidity allows through the City Council Adopted General Fund Reserve Policy. The monies may be accessed immediately by the City until they are invested in the Section 115 Trusts, at which time they may only be used to offset future/current pension liabilities. See note 6 with respect to pension and OPEB liabilities outstanding.
NOTES
Category: One-Time
Discretionary Funding
Staff anticipated an estimated $2.1 million to be received by June 30, 2027 for the sale of the Dale site. This funding will be dependent upon approval of a development in accordance with the City's standards and actions by the Planning Commission and City Council.
GUSD JUA
105 301
Capital Projects Totals
101
General Fund
102
Pension
103
Measures E/Z
The General Fund reserve policy is a minimum of 30% to maximum of 45% of prior year operational expenditures. Total of $4.6 million is the amount in excess of the reserve minimum (30%). The amount in the Measure E/Z fund balance is available in it's entirety ($2.3 million). The City's Reserve Policy provides the City Council time to make decisions in economic downturns or funding loss from the State of California without significant impacts to service delivery to the community. Further this funding provides a stabilization to meet debt requirements, which partially resulted in the City's AAA bond ratings. Per the existing financial policies of the City Council, when General Fund revenues exceed expenditures it allows the City to set aside monies in reserve, future capital projects, stabilization of CalPERS pension/OPEB costs, as well as general liabilities, worker's compensation, fleet maintenance and technology costs. More specifically, when revenues exceed expenditures, the City's financial policies allocated that amount at the following percentages 50% to the Capital Projects Fund, 30% to the PERS Rate Stabilization Fund, 10% to OPEB Section 115 Trust (held in General Fund) and 10% to Internal Service Funds.
The City and Glendora Unified School District (GUSD) have a long history of partnering on community assets (e.g. middle school parks, high school pool, etc.). GUSD has a current pool renovation project, in which the CIty has contributed $600,000 to the $3.9 million dollar project. Additionally, the City Council approved an additional contribution of up to $900,000 that is dependent on the City's financial performance through June 30, 2027.
The sale of the San Jose site provided the City with $3.99 million. The City Council previously allocated $1 million of these proceeds to achieve initiatives in the City's strategic and economic development action plans (8/27/2024).
These funds are generally restructured and may only be used to pay for CalPERS retirement costs (Pension) or reimburse qualifying retired employees' medical premiums (OPEB). The monies may be accessed by the City to pay for specific liabilities, requiring certification of the expense. Currently, the City's CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL) is $21.7 million, which is anticipated to be reduced to $10.3 million next year with CalPERS better than anticipated asset returns. Additionally, the City has an other post employment benefits (OPEB) liability of approximately $5.6 million. Finally, the City has an outstanding pension obligation bond principal amount of approximately $51 million.
Amounts represent possible funding received through sale and development of land owned other local agencies over the next five years.
ONE-TIME FUNDING
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE / FINANCE DEPARTMENTCITY COUNCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 24, 2026KYLE JOHNSON, FINANCE DIRECTORADAM RAYMOND, CITY MANAGER
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Glendora has restored financial stability over the last seven years o Addressed $3–$4M structural deficit
o Voter-approved Measures E & Zo Pension restructuring (POB)o Significantly strengthened reserve, liability and capital funding policieso Modernized city/departmental operationso Earned AAA bond rating
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Results have been significant
o Generational investments in infrastructure
o Improved street conditions (PCI upward trend, albeit small), reversing decades of decline o Significant investments in public safety, homelessnesso Reduced chronic vacancieso Major investments in technologyo $50+ million in grant revenues (e.g. Finkbiner stormwater, intersections, first/last mile)
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
• January 13, 2026 – Staff committed to broader one-time funding discussion• February 24, 2026 – Mid-Year Budget Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Glendora has restored financial stability over the last seven years o Addressed $3–$4M structural deficit
o Voter-approved Measures E & Zo Pension restructuring (POB)o Strengthened reserves and capital funding policieso Earned AAA bond rating
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Note Description
1 The General Fund reserve policy is a minimum of 30% to maximum of 45% of prior year operational expenditures. Total of $4.6 million is the amount in excess of the reserve minimum (30%). When revenues exceed expenditures, the City's financial policies allocated that amount at the following percentages 50% to the Capital Projects Fund, 30% to the PERS Rate Stabilization Fund, 10% to OPEB Section 115 Trust (held in General Fund) and 10% to Internal Service Funds. 3 The sale of the San Jose site provided the City with $3.99 million. The City Council previously allocated $1 million of these proceeds to achieve initiatives in the City's strategic and economic development action plans (8/27/2024). 4 Staff anticipated an estimated $2.1 million to be received by June 30, 2027 for the sale of the Dale site. This funding will be dependent upon approval of a development in accordance with the City's standards and actions by the Planning Commission and City Council. 5 Amounts represent possible funding received through sale and development of land owned other local agencies over the next five years.
6 These funds are generally restructured and may only be used to pay for CalPERS retirement costs (Pension) or reimburse qualifying retired employees' medical premiums (OPEB). The monies may be accessed by the City to pay for specific liabilities, requiring certification of the expense. Currently, the City's CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL) is $21.7 million, which is anticipated to be reduced to $10.3 million next year with CalPERS better than anticipated asset returns. Additionally, the City has an other post employment benefits (OPEB) liability of approximately $5.6 million. Finally, the City has an outstanding pension obligation bond principal amount of approximately $51 million. 7 These funds are generally restricted. Currently, these funds have been set aside for investment in the Section 115 Trusts as cash on hand/liquidity allows through the City Council Adopted General Fund Reserve Policy. The monies may be accessed immediately by the City until they are invested in the Section 115 Trusts, at which time they may only be used to offset future/current pension liabilities. See note 6 with respect to pension and OPEB liabilities outstanding.
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Note Description
6 These funds are generally restructured and may only be used to pay for CalPERS retirement costs (Pension) or reimburse qualifying retired employees' medical premiums (OPEB). The monies may be accessed by the City to pay for specific liabilities, requiring certification of the expense. Currently, the City's CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL) is $21.7 million, which is anticipated to be reduced to $10.3 million next year with CalPERS better than anticipated asset returns. Additionally, the City has an other post employment benefits (OPEB) liability of approximately $5.6 million. Finally, the City has an outstanding pension obligation bond principal amount of approximately $51 million. 7 These funds are generally restricted. Currently, these funds have been set aside for investment in the Section 115 Trusts as cash on hand/liquidity allows through the City Council Adopted General Fund Reserve Policy. The monies may be accessed immediately by the City until they are invested in the Section 115 Trusts, at which time they may only be used to offset future/current pension liabilities. See note 6 with respect to pension and OPEB liabilities outstanding.
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2
Property Sales
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6 $ 6,090,000
Reserve7 $ 240,000 7,730,000 $ 180,000 $
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000 $
102
Pension
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1 $ 569,000 2,280,000 $ 260,000 $
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2
Property Sales
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 2,280,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000 $
103
Measures E/Z
Note Description
1 The amount in the Measure E/Z fund balance is available in it's entirety ($2.3 million).
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Note Description
2 The City and Glendora Unified School District (GUSD) have a long history of partnering on community assets (e.g. middle school parks, high school pool, etc.). GUSD has a current pool renovation project, in which the CIty has contributed $600,000 to the $3.9 million dollar project. Additionally, the City Council approved an additional contribution of up to $900,000 that is dependent on the City's financial performance through June 30, 2027.
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2 $ 900,000
Property Sales
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 900,000 $ - $ - $
GUSD JUA
105
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
Notes
Reprioritization of discretionary capital project funding, largely consisting of future civic center projects (e.g. roof replacement, council chamber expansion, etc.).
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP
Reprioritization of Projects $ 1,000,000GUSD Pool 2
Property Sales
San Jose3Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside
Section 115 Trust 6Reserve7
Grand Totals 1,000,000 $ - $ - $
301
Capital Projects
ONE-TIME FUNDING DISCUSSION
One-Time
Discretionary Funding
By Two-Year Budget Cycle FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund Balance $ 569,000 6,860,000 $ 260,000 $
In Excess of Policy 1
45%30%
Reallocation of CIP $ - 1,900,000 $ - $
Reprioritization of ProjectsGUSD Pool 2
Property Sales $ 4,000,000 5,120,000 $ 4,000,000 $
San Jose3
Dale4School Site Development 5
Pension Set Aside $ 240,000 13,820,000 $ 180,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
OPEB Set Aside $ 80,000 4,080,000 $ 60,000 $
Section 115 Trust 6
Reserve7
Grand Totals 31,780,000 $ 4,889,000 $ 4,500,000 $
Totals
FUTURE POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
• Examples of policy areas the City Council may need to take into consideration when discussing one-time use of discretionary funds:
o Strategic use of one-time funds for street improvements to bridge existing gap of $3- 3.5 million to raise PCI from a 63 to a 70 over the next seven years. o Possible targeted use of one-time funds now, backfilled with future funding opportunities (e.g. Sale of property, development of local agency owned property). This policy direction could be used for either streets or city facilities.o Pay-down of future POB obligations in 2029 to free up $1.5 million in cash flow savings that could be used for another priority (e.g. Streets).
FUTURE POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
• Examples of policy areas the City Council may need to take into consideration when discussing one-time use of discretionary funds:
o Prioritization of city facility needs (e.g. public works yard, library, roofing needs, etc.). o Impacts on operational flexibility and services to the community during economic downturns, without ability to use general fund or pension reserves.o Impacts on future liabilities with more or less funding for street/sidewalk projects. o Impacts of bond ratings and future borrowing costs with the use of reserves.
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
• Government “fund” accounting is difficult to understand o Attachment C – Overview of City’s investment portfolio and what funding is for o Attachment D – Overview of the various funding sources and what is discretionary and what is not
RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:1. RECEIVE AN OVERVIEW ON ONE-TIME FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES; AND2. PROVIDE DIRECTION, AS NEEDED.
Attachment C (Cash and Investment Pool Explained)
Why the City’s $125 Million Cash and Investment Balance Isn’t a Giant Piggy Bank Executive Summary
The City of Glendora maintains approximately $125 million in pooled cash and investments.
While that number may sound like unrestricted money available for any purpose, the vast majority of those funds are legally restricted, contractually committed, or reserved for specific uses.
Government fund accounting requires that dollars collected for one purpose (such as water, gas tax, grants, or development fees) may only be used for that specific purpose.
In practical terms, the City’s cash pool operates like a collection of labeled envelopes rather than a single checking account.
x Most funds already have assigned jobs (infrastructure projects, utility operations, debt payments, grants, and emergency reserves).
x Only a portion of the total represents flexible General Fund resources used for core services like police, public works, development, parks, and libraries. x Fund accounting can feel unusual and overly complex, but it exists to ensure transparency, legal compliance, fiscal stability, and protection of taxpayer dollars.
It’s One Vault, But Many ‘Envelopes’
The $125 million is pooled together for investment purposes (to maximize interest earnings).
Internally, it is divided into separate funds, each with its own legal purpose.
Think of it like having a mortgage account, a college fund, a car repair fund, and a ‘don’t touch or the auditors (IRS in personal/business world) will appear’ fund — all at the same bank. Many dollars are legally restricted:
Ȉ Gas tax revenue – Must be used for streets and transportation.
Ȉ Water fees – Must be used for water systems.
Ȉ Risk management funds – Must be used for future liabilities.
Ȉ Grant funds – Must be used exactly as specified by the grant.
Ȉ Debt proceeds – Must be used for legally approved projects.
Using these funds for anything else is not just discouraged — it is illegal.
Some Money Is Already Spoken For
Ȉ Funds may already be committed to contracts approved by the City Council.
Ȉ Capital projects underway have funding set aside.
Ȉ Required reserves must be maintained for financial stability.
Ȉ Some balances represent liabilities already owed (pensions, invoices, deposits).
Cities Must Maintain Reserves
Ȉ Emergencies, natural disasters, and economic downturns happen.
Ȉ Maintaining reserves protects the City’s credit rating.
Ȉ Strong reserves help avoid sudden service cuts or tax increases.
Attachment C (Cash and Investment Pool Explained)
Spending reserves simply because cash exists would be like spending your emergency savings because your checking account looks full. Likewise, a full checkbook does not indicate cash/savings exists or are available to be spent.
Why Fund Accounting Feels So Confusing
Ȉ Businesses focus on profit.
Ȉ Families can focus on cash flow and savings.
Ȉ Governments focus on legal purpose and public accountability.
Instead of one checking account, cities manage dozens of funds that must balance independently. It may feel rigid, but this structure ensures transparency, accountability, and compliance with law.
What Is Actually Flexible?
Only a portion of the total cash pool represents General Fund dollars that can support core services such as:
x Police
x Parks
x Library
x Development
x General City operations
Even those funds must cover ongoing operational costs, not one-time wish lists.
Timing Matters: Revenues and Expenses Don’t Arrive Together Another important piece of the puzzle is timing. The City operates year-round, but revenues do not all arrive evenly throughout the year.
x Property tax revenue is typically received in installments (primarily December and April). x Sales tax receipts are received monthly but based on prior activity. x Grant funds are often reimbursed after the City has already spent the money. x Utility revenues fluctuate based on usage and billing cycles.
This means the City must carefully manage cash flow to ensure bills, payroll, and contract payments are made on time, even when major revenues have not yet arrived.
In many cases, especially with state and federal grants, the City must front the money for a project and then submit documentation to receive reimbursement. So, while a grant may be awarded for a project, the cash almost never arrives before the expenses occur.
Due to these timing differences, maintaining adequate cash balances is critical. The presence of cash in the investment pool does not mean the funds are surplus, it often means the City is responsibly managing timing differences between when money is received and when it must be spent.
Attachment C (Cash and Investment Pool Explained)
Bottom Line
When you hear that the City has $125 million in the bank, it does not mean the City has $125 million available for discretionary spending.
It means the City responsibly manages multiple legally restricted and purpose-driven funds, which have timing challenges with revenues and expenses, in an organized, accountable, and carefully monitored way to protect the community’s financial stability.
Attachment D (Budget Explained)
City of Glendora
Where Does the $125 Million Go?
(And Why We Can’t Just Spend It on Whatever We Want)
How Glendora Actually Builds a Budget (Hint: It’s Not Guesswork) Before we talk about funding sources, restrictions, and why we can’t repave every street tomorrow, it’s important to understand Glendora does not budget one year at a time and hope for the best. Sound financial management requires:
x Multi-year financial planning
x Ongoing financial monitoring
x Frequent financial reporting
x Prompt corrective action when necessary
x Long-term financial health strategies
In other words, we do not steer the City by looking only through the rearview mirror.
Glendora adopts a two-year budget to provide greater certainty for the City Council, departments, employees, and the public regarding ongoing funding and staffing for programs and services.
Even more importantly, we include a Five-Year Financial Projection for:
x The General Fund
x Measures E/Z
x The Water Fund(s)
This allows the City to evaluate the long-term impact of policy decisions during the budget process. If a decision creates structural imbalance three years from now, we see it coming. And ideally, we fix it before it becomes tomorrow’s headline.
Layered on top of that are our guiding documents, which include but are not limited to:
x Community Surveys
x City Council Strategic Plans
x Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
x Parks Master Plan
x Water Master Plan
Policy sets direction. Data sets priorities. The budget follows both.
The approximately $125 million annual budget is not a wish list. It is a structured financial response to adopted goals, infrastructure needs, and legal requirements. What gets funded, gets done.
Attachment D (Budget Explained)
Why We Can’t Just Spend $125 Million on Anything We Want When people hear '$125 million budget,' it can sound like a very large, very flexible piggy bank.
It is not.
The City operates roughly 60 separate funds divided into six major fund types.
Think of the budget as one vault filled with dozens of labeled envelopes. Each envelope has a name, a job, and in many cases, a very strict set of rules.
Gas tax must be used for streets. Water fees must stay in water. Grant funds must follow grant rules. Debt must be paid on schedule.
Using restricted funds for unrelated purposes is not creative budgeting, it is illegal. And auditors do not accept 'but it seemed like a good idea at the time.' The City would know, we get audited by 10+ agencies on an annual basis.
The Six Fund Types (Also Known as The Envelopes)
1. General Fund, Measures E/Z and GUSD JUA – The Flexible Ones (Sort Of) The General Fund supports police, parks, the library, public works operations, administration, and community development.
It represents approximately 45% of the City’s total annual budget, or roughly $56.5 million of the $125 million total.
It is the most flexible fund — but even it is largely committed to ongoing expenses such as employees, contracts, and services to the community. The Police Department, Public Works Department and Community and Economic Development comprise approximately65% of the General Fund.
So yes, it is flexible. But it is also very, very busy.
2. Special Revenue Funds – The Rule Followers
Restricted by State law, Federal law, local ordinance, or voter approval, these funds must be used only for specific purposes such as transportation, grants, or development-related infrastructure.
They represent approximately $15.9 million, or 13% of the total budget.
They are not available for general operations — no matter how compelling the proposal.
3. Capital Project Funds – The Builders
Attachment D (Budget Explained)
Dedicated to long-term infrastructure improvements and major projects.
These funds help ensure we invest today without undermining tomorrow’s operating stability.
4. Debt Service Funds – The Bill Payers
Used exclusively to repay bond obligations and capital lease agreements.
Debt payments are contractual commitments. They are not optional. They are not flexible. They are simply due.
5. Enterprise Fund (Water) – The Utility Business
Funded by water rates and legally restricted to water operations and infrastructure.
The Water Fund represents approximately $31.4 million, or 25% of the total annual budget.
Water customers pay for water, not for everything else.
6. Internal Service Funds – The Behind-the-Scenes Team
Support internal operations such as insurance, technology, and fleet management.
They may not get headlines, but without them, things break — both literally and financially.
Bottom Line
The City does not have $125 million available for discretionary spending.
It manages a system of legally restricted, contractually obligated, purpose-driven funds. We are guided by multi-year planning, ongoing monitoring, and long-term financial strategies.
Fund accounting may feel rigid. That is intentional.
It protects taxpayers, preserves infrastructure, supports responsible planning, and ensures today’s decisions do not become tomorrow’s financial problem.
V.5.4
City of Glendora
Ad-Hoc Citizen’s Advisory Committee
Revenue Options and Expenditures
of the City's General Fund
Final Report to the City Council
Committee Chair Committee Vice-Chair
Michael Holmes Cliff Hamlow
Committee Members
Sandra Blaydow Rukshan Fernando James Martindale Tomoko Toland William Bresee Anita Gutierrez Gene Morrill Brian Ursettie Timothy Cremins Linda Hermann Gene Murabito Margaux Viera John Doan Bob Kuhn
Jennifer Leos
Wendy Seyfert
Joseph Ward
Carol Ann Walls-Sandell
November 2019
2 BACKGROUND
This Report is submitted by the City of Glendora’s Ad Hoc Committee (Committee). Each volunteer-resident member of the Committee was appointed by the City Council to review, study, and ask questions regarding the city’s near- and long-term financial viability. And, where practical, make specific recommendations regarding revenue enhancement and expense reductions.
The City of Glendora offers exceptional housing, award-winning schools and a dynamic ‘small town’ business climate, along with fiscally-minded governance all of which are strong factors in the ongoing success of the City’s local economy.
The City has a long tradition of strong, local fiscal management including maintaining a high level of service with a fairly low tax burden (when compared to neighboring cities).1 Unfortunately, many cities in California are struggling to maintain basic services as funding pressure, through increased structural costs for pensions, regulatory mandates, and general cost increases have outpaced revenues.
Expense Reductions
The City has been in the forefront of expense reductions including a decrease in staffing levels by 23% since 2009 (which included a reduction in staffing of the Police Department by 14%).2 The City has been diligent in its efforts to reduce pension related expenditures, for example, by implementing lower benefit levels for new employee pension plans before it was required by the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (“PEPRA”).3 PEPRA resulted in further reductions of pension benefits for new employees. The intent of these expense reductions was to:
1. Maintain a structurally balanced budget in which recurring revenues equal or exceed recurring expenditures. This process provides financial stability for the city in the long-term.
2. A budget that is not structurally balanced is one balanced through the use of one-time resources such as fund balance, asset lease proceeds or borrowing and/or using nonrecurring, one-time revenues. Such methods portend financial difficulties and is not a sustainable practice; and,
3. Maintain the core services of public safety, utilities, street and road maintenance, community services, and, to keep public areas accessible and available.
Even with these staffing reductions, service levels have remained fairly consistent across all departments. However, without a definitive course of future action, the city’s financial future remains uncertain.
Please note: all footnote links referenced in this report were verified and active as of October 18, 2019. 1 See: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23120. 2 For example see past articles regarding how Glendora proposed to reduce costs, https://patch.com/california/glendora/cityproposes-layoffs-program-cuts-to-cover-1-million-deficit and https://www.sgvtribune.com/2011/06/21/glendora-budgetproposal-includes-layoffs-seeks-714000-in-cuts/ 3 For background on PEPRA, please see: https://www.calpers.ca.gov/page/about/laws-legislation-regulations/public-employeespension-reform-act. 3 Seeking a Solution—Creation of the Ad Hoc Committee (Citizen’s Advisory Panel) As a matter of regular practice for many years, the City Council, City Manager, and Department Heads meet periodically to review and update the city’s Strategic Plan. During such a meeting on January 25, 2018, this group discussed the ongoing concern that current revenue sources and longer-term projections would not keep pace with the anticipated expenditure trends.4
This Strategic Planning Group, led by the City Council, discussed the possibility of seeking community input by the creation of a citizen’s advisory panel; it was established that then Mayor Thompson and Councilmember Nelson would further explore this issue. On April 10, 2018, Mayor Thompson and Councilmember Nelson formally presented to the city council an agenda item recommending the creation of an Ad-Hoc Citizen’s Advisory Committee to evaluate the following:5
x Why there may be a [revenue] problem.
x How and/or what might be recommended to create new revenue sources. x Are there other ways to address the "problem."
x The committee summarized it this way, “Increase Revenues and Reduce Expenditures.” It was recommended that the committee be comprised of between 15-21 persons with a diverse background. However, a financial background, especially with public entities should be highly valued. It would be open to city residents and city business owners.
Each Councilmember would appoint two members to the panel. The remaining seats of the panel (5 to 11) would be from the public at-large and be selected similar to the appointment process for Commissions/Boards. The City Council would appoint a Chair and Vice-Chair of the Ad-hoc Committee and the primary staff liaison would be the Finance Director.
The City Council voted unanimously to adopt the recommendations of this agenda item.6
SELECTION OF MEMBERS
After the agenda item was approved, the city began soliciting applications from members of the community who wished to serve on the committee.7
This subsequently resulted in the City
Council appointing, on May 16, 2018, twenty members to the Ad-Hoc Citizen’s Advisory Committee. Michael Holmes was appointed as the Committee Chair and Cliff Hamlow as the Vice-Chair.
4 See City of Glendora’s Strategic Planning Retreat (http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=21645), where [see pages 7 of 9] the three-year goal under “Maintain Financial Stability” was to “Develop and recommend to the City Council for consideration the appointment of a Citizen’s Advisory Panel to report on possible new revenue sources to address funding needs.”
5 See the May 16, 2018, City of Glendora Council Agenda: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=24727. 6 Ibid. 7 For example, see this ad in the Glendora City News dated May 1, 2018: https://glendoracitynews.com/2018/05/01/applicantswanted-for-glendora-financial-ad-hoc-committee/ 4 OVERVIEW OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The first meeting was held on June 7, 2018.8
Mayor Thompson attended and spoke at the
beginning of the meeting. In response to a question from the committee, he clarified that the committee could also evaluate cost saving items as well as revenue sources. 9 (emphasis added)
Over the next eleven months, the committee met a total of eleven times which included a tour of various city owned properties.
Committee Chair Holmes ran the meetings. Finance Director June Overholt attended all the meetings to present information and data, answer questions and serve as a resource to the committee. City Manager Jeffers and subsequently City Manager Raymond attended selected meetings to serve as a resource. Agendas and minutes were kept of each meeting and posted on the city’s website.10
UNDERSTANDING THE FINANCIAL CONCERNS
From the meetings, the data, and the discussions that followed, the committee learned that:11, 12 x Since 2009, a number of City positions have been eliminated. x The city had outsourced more than twenty different types of services to save costs. x City fees are evaluated on an annual basis as a part of the budget process. x Department heads (police chief, public works directors, etc.) are held accountable for the finances of their department.
x Rising pension costs are probably the most significant expense issue the city faces.13 The committee learned that:
9 Glendora was one of the first cities to add a second pension tier for new employees. This results in cost savings over time.
9 All members of city employment groups now contribute a greater share of their paychecks to help pay for pension cost.
9 In 2013, the state of California enacted the Public Employees’ Pension Employee Reform Act (PEPRA).14 This law revised benefits for new employees and modified some potential benefits of current employees. This is projected over time to result in significant cost savings across the state and for the city of Glendora. However, the manner in which pension costs are calculated, the city will not realize the benefits of these lower costs for another ten to fifteen years.15
8 Subsequent meetings were held in 2018 on: Jun 20, Jul 11, Jul 25, Aug 16, Aug 29, Sep 6, Sep 12, Oct 24, and April 10, 2019. 9 The Committee’s meetings, agendas, minutes and presentations may be found at:
http://www.cityofglendora.org/departments/government/boards-commissions-and-committees/ad-hoc-committee. Plus, Mayor Thompson’s input was included in personal notes taken and various recollections at the same meeting. 10 See: http://www.cityofglendora.org/departments/government/boards-commissions-and-committees/ad-hoc-committee 11 There are excellent City of Glendora financial and budgetary resources found here:
http://www.cityofglendora.org/departments-services/finance/finance-reports 12 For example, in documents provided by the City, full time equivalent employment (FTE’s) for FY 2009 were 316.64 positions, while the proposed budget for FY 2019 showed 245.26 FTE’s—a 22.5% staffing reduction over approximately ten years. See:
http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23243 (page 30). 13 Op. cit. (see: foot note 11 within the referenced document) 14 For a summary of the PEPRA go to https://www.calpers.ca.gov/docs/forms-publications/summary-pension-act.pdf. According to PERS: “The improvement in funded status has generally reduced the risk that plans will fall to low funding levels. However, employer contribution levels are climbing and this is potentially increasing financial stress on some employers. When combined with some of the environmental changes discussed in the report, this is an area of concern for the future. In addition to the overall level of the contributions, sudden sharp increases in employer contribution rates remain a concern as well. The greatest risk to the system continues to be the ability of employers to make their required contributions. However, with few exceptions, employers are currently up-to-date with their contribution requirements.” [emphasis added] 15 For a detailed primer on the City’s history with CalPERS and its ongoing funding obligations, please see:
http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23245 5 Current and Future Revenue Challenges
The committee discussed and/or received many detailed presentations from city staff, a private consulting company, and from committee members who had conducted their own research on a variety of topics. In addition:
x The Committee received and discussed an overview of the City of Glendora’s organizational structure, which included detailed financial data on the different types of funding—along with various restrictions imposed by the state and federal governments, x The FY 2018-19 budget (which at the time of our meetings was being discussed and reviewed by the City Council), and, projected revenue and deficit forecasts. x The Committee received a detailed overview of the city’s future budget challenges. x Current and projected pension costs were studied in great detail, particularly how amortization calculations and the projected impacts of unfunded pension liabilities impact city revenues.
x The Committee reviewed the city’s General Fund key revenue sources consisting of:
Property Tax and Sales Tax.
x The Committee also studied Capital Improvement Funding, the impacts of deferred maintenance—both in streets, public facilities (property and buildings), vehicles and equipment—and related expenses to individual departments. x Potential Revenue and Expense reductions were also reviewed and prioritized. This included recommendations for citywide cost saving activities and potential service delivery changes. x The committee learned about the city’s anticipated revenue concerns—and was presented a benchmark, the ‘Great Recession,’ for comparison.16 Starting after 2008, the city’s revenues have recovered and were generally increasing each year. However, expenditures were increasing at a much greater rate and the city was facing a $500,000 budget shortfall in fiscal year 2019. This was projected to increase to more than $2,000,000 by FY 22-23 and will continue for the next ten to fifteen years until the shortfall begins decreasing.17 The primary causes of this budgetary “structural deficit” are:
9 Rising employee pension costs. Changes in CalPERS “discount” (also known as the “assumed rate of return”) rate doubles the City’s costs and revisions with a reduction in the amortization period;
9 Loss of redevelopment funding due to state legislative action; 9 Increasing state and federal mandates with no additional funding being provided for implementation;18
9 Reliance on special revenues for operating costs (like asset forfeiture). 9 Fundamental changes in the retail economic environment due to a significant increase in online sales and subsequent loss of sales tax revenue
9 Natural and cyclical economic fluctuations;
9 Employee Negotiations;
9 Ongoing infrastructure needs: deferred maintenance of the streets and public facilities; and 9 Reliance on special revenues for operating costs such as asset forfeiture, franchise fees, permits, fees, etc.
16 According to the Federal Reserve, “the Great Recession began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009, which makes it the longest recession since World War II.” See: https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/great_recession_of_200709 17 For a complete background and overview of the projected budget deficit, please see the materials from the June 7, 2019, Ad Hoc Citizens Advisory Committee found here: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23243 18 See: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23319, specifically on page 19, for a discussion regarding “California Ballot Initiatives Influencing Local Government Finances.” 6 We also learned that Glendora is not unique in this predicament. A significant number of cities in California are experiencing almost identical budget issues.19 BASIS FOR THE COMMITTEE’S RECOMMENDATIONS
Options
1. Focus on issues that would significantly increase revenues and/or reduce costs. The projected annual budget deficit was in the $500,000 (FY 2019 to nearly $2,000,000 range estimated by FY 2023].20 The chart below indicates the projected structural imbalance in the City’s General Fund.
For example, the suggestion of minor revenue increases, such as doubling a $10 fee, would not solve the budget issue.
2. Conduct a broad, higher level view if there
appeared to be the potential of a significant
revenue increase or cost savings, and then,
recommend that the city council take steps to
explore the issue in greater detail.
The reason is that some solutions would
require significant resources in staff time,
expenses, and community input that were
outside the scope and the time commitment of
the Committee’s assignment.
For example, if the Committee recommended the sale of a city park (a one-time revenue increase) so it could be replaced, for example, with a residential development (accompanied by an on-going increase in property tax revenue); many other factors would come into play.
For example: Does the community want this? Town hall meetings/surveys would need to be done. What is the environmental impact? A study would need to be commissioned. Are there utility (i.e., water, electric issues)? What is the potential for lawsuits? What is the cost / impact to the infrastructure (streets, sewers, etc.) vs the property tax increase? How are police, fire, and school services affected, etc.?
19 See for example: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/27/californias-fiscal-risks-despite-largest-surplus-in-more-than-decade.html, https://californiapolicycenter.org/californias-most-financially-stressed-cities-and-counties/, and https://www.calpers.ca.gov/docs/forms-publications/annual-review-funding-2018.pdf 20 See: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23243 and http://sirepub.ci.glendora.ca.us/sirepub/cache/2/ylghxpg2mmhdy52qtvkzxoyc/34075409022019112437295.PDF 7 The committee determined to pursue a broader scope of recommendations and not focus one issue.
SEEKING SOLUTIONS—EXPENSE REDUCTIONS
Pension Bond Refinancing
x Pension costs were studied in detail and how amortization calculations and the projected impacts of unfunded pension liabilities impact city revenues. x The committee learned that the city could take steps to issue a bond that would pay off the city’s unfunded pension liability to CalPERS. The creation of the bond would lower the amount of money the city pays due to the difference in interest rates (this is comparable to refinancing a home mortgage at a lower interest rate).
x As the committee was meeting, the city council was taking action to issue a pension bond.21 ¾ The committee concurred with this course of action.
Contracting-Out City Services
The committee reviewed and discussed very basic information on potential cost savings for outsourcing the City’s Police Department to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. The committee also received information on potential cost savings for the possibility of outsourcing the library to the Los Angeles County Library system. In addition, we noted that some local cities outsource Public Works and Community Services.
Outsourcing
Item Pros Cons
Glendora Police
Department and the Los
Angeles County
Sheriff’s Department22
x Possible reduction in budget costs
due to consolidation of services with
Los Angeles County, i.e., economies
of scale (personnel, vehicles,
equipment, training, facilities)
x “Fix” the cost of services
x The availability of additional
resources
x Less local control over police-led
efforts and initiatives
x Decreased staffing levels
x Turnover in personnel
x Unable to control rising costs because
the county oversees contract negations.
x The cost versus the services provided
can vary greatly
x Clarity of reporting—allegiance to
County or City?
x Long-time city sentiment recognizes
the good job the Glendora PD is
doing23
x Lack of community engagement
x Prioritization of calls
x Response times
21 The City Council authorized issuing POBs [Pension Obligation Bonds] to address the City’s $57.5 million unfunded accrued liability (“UAL”) for employee pensions provided through the California Public Employees’ Pension System (“CalPERS”). See the City Council agenda item, dated March 12, 2019 at: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=25033. There was excellent news in conjunction with this subsequent bond sale in August 2019, as the city obtained a 'AAA' bond rating from Standard and Poor's on the proposed Pension Obligation Bonds! Glendora is now among one of fifteen cities with debt outstanding that have achieved this credit rating in California. S&P specifically noted “the local economy, the financial performance of the City, and City management with particular focus on financial policies and practices, as major factors in determining the credit rating.” See: https://www.standardandpoors.com/en_AU/web/guest/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/2281522 22 For a very rough cost analysis and using the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s contract with the city of San Dimas, see the notes from the committee meeting of July 25, 2018, p. 33, at http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23323. 23 See a list of community surveys which rate police (emergency) services at: http://www.cityofglendora.org/departmentsservices/city-manager/glendora-community-survey-results. Consistently, the surveys indicate that local residents note that providing police services is the most or among the most important of the City of Glendora services. 8 City Library24 Potential reductions in overall costs
(please note, the actual savings have
yet to be identified and/or quantified)
x Outsourcing could lead to reduced
service
x Underserving of populations more
difficult to reach
x It was suggested that the City currently
operates its library at less cost than the
County
Community Services
and Public Works
Potential reductions in overall costs
(please note, the actual savings have
yet to be identified and/or quantified)
Outsourcing could lead to reduced service
The committee felt strongly that any consideration for outsourcing would require significant study, by the City Council, and community input.
¾ It is recommended that the City Council and city staff recognize that the city may have potential cost savings by outsourcing any of these four departments.
SEEKING SOLUTIONS—REVENUE INCREASES
The Committee also received information on legislation and court cases relating to sales and use tax, and additional revenue enhancement options. An excellent presentation was made by Mr.
Lloyd de Llamas, of HDL, a firm that specializes in public agency revenue management services including sales tax, property tax, lodging tax, business license and tax, and tax, economic development.25 With the background from Mr. de Llamas and city staff, the committee discussed three potential revenue sources—i.e., tax increases—that could potentially bring in between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 in additional annual revenue. Any of these revenue sources would assist in reducing the projected structural budget deficit that the city is facing.
Each of these options would require voter approval, to pass as prescribed by state law.26
1. Property (Parcel) Tax Increase
The committee had several concerns with this:
A) Property owners would bear the cost of this. Renters would not; and
B) Based upon when a property was last sold, property tax obligations could vary significantly amongst neighbors
who owned properties of comparable value. It was also
noted that the Glendora Unified School District has
proposed several property tax measures in recent years; the last one failed.27 This was indicative that the Glendora community may not be supportive of another property tax measure.
24 For additional background on the outsourcing the library, see: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23323 25 For background and the expertise of Mr. de Llamas and his firm, refer to: https://www.hdlcompanies.com/ 26 For example, a Parcel Tax requires a 2/3’s voter approval. A Transaction (Sales) Tax, requires at least a 50% plus 1 vote, a User Utility Tax requires at least a 50% plus 1 vote. For additional background, see:
http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=24470 27 See https://www.sgvtribune.com/2017/11/08/after-measure-gg-fails-glendora-unified-will-regroup-to-find-new-funding/ and https://ballotpedia.org/Glendora_Unified_School_District,_Bond_Issue,_Measure_GG_(November_2017). For this to pass a 55% supermajority was required for approval. The final vote was: 2,763 NO [52.89%] and 2,461 YES [47.11%]. 9 2. Utility Tax
This would affect both property owners and renters. However, utilities are a necessity and increases in utility prices would negatively affect low-income households and seniors on fixed incomes. However, this remains a viable source of potential revenues:
3. Sales Tax Increase
This would apply equally and is based upon how much you purchase or lease of tangible personal property. Real property and services are excluded—it is charged only when sold to the end user. In Glendora, 85% of the sales tax revenue is generated by 5% of businesses. The committee also learned that due primarily to the Glendora Marketplace, Diamond Ridge, and Wal Mart retail centers, that more than 50% of sales tax revenue is collected from nonresidents who shop in Glendora. In essence, non-residents would be helping to pay for city services while they were shopping in Glendora.28
The committee also learned that the state sales tax rate is set by state law at 10.25% and cannot be increased under current law. 29, 30 The last tax increase was Los Angeles County’s “Measure H” to support the homeless.31 The Measure H increase is estimated to generate about $1,500,000 from the city of Glendora, yet, Los Angeles County controls the money and Glendora receives approximately $100,000 each year!32
Conclusions Related to Revenue Enhancements:
The committee determined that the sales tax increase (No. 3 above) was the best option:
x It is a tax paid regionally and not borne entirely by the City’s residents. x This tax has a statutory cap of 10.25%. Currently, the tax is set at 9.5%. This leaves an opportunity for a 0.75% increase.
x A proposed increase would be competitive with what other local cities have done or are proposing to implement.
x If a sales tax increase was approved by local voters, all the revenue would stay with the city under local control.
28 For an excellent overview of the sales tax process in California and its impacts to Glendora see the July 25, 2018 Ad Hoc Committee meeting presentation at: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23323 29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_and_use_taxes_in_California 30 See: http://www.westerncity.com/article/primer-california-city-revenues-part-two-major-city-revenues 31 See: here. A yes vote was a vote in favor of authorizing a 0.25 percent county sales tax for 10 years in order to fund homeless services and prevention. A 2/3 vote (66.7%) was required for the approval of Measure H and the measure passed with 69.34% of the vote cast.
32 For comprehensive detail on the city’s revenue stream, see: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=23120 10 As the committee was meeting, we learned that eleven cities in Los Angeles County had placed sales tax increase initiatives on the Nov 2018 ballot. However, it was too late for a Glendora ballot initiative to be placed on the Nov 2018 ballot; but the committee learned that the city could place, within the prescribed process, a sales tax increase on the ballot as early as March 2019. If Glendora waited for the November 2019 election, it could possibly compete with state and county initiatives that would ‘override’ Glendora’s initiative if both were approved.
¾ Based upon this information, the committee was unanimous in its decision to present a preliminary report to the city council on Sep. 11, 2018 recommending that while the committee was still in-progress, the city should immediately take steps to conduct a special election for a sales tax initiative.33
The city council subsequently chose to follow this course of action and the sales tax initiative (Measure E) was passed by the voters on March 5, 2019. The estimated revenue increase each year is estimated at $3.7M to $4M in Year-1 and $5M after being fully implemented.34 33 http://www.cityofglendora.org/residents/online-videos (after accessing this site, you will then need to search for the Tuesday, Sep. 11, 2018 City Council meeting). More specifically, the action directed the City Attorney to prepare legislation for the September 25, 2018, City Council meeting to place a measure on the March 2019 ballot to seek a three-quarter cent increase in the City’s sales (transaction) tax rate, from 9.5% to 10.25%; and, recommend the Ad-Hoc Citizens Advisory Committee continue to work with City staff on identifying expenditure efficiencies and other potential revenue enhancements. 34 See: https://ballotpedia.org/Glendora,_California,_Measure_E,_General_Sales_Tax_(March_2019) 11 POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF CITY-OWNED PARCELS
The committee inquired about the potential for one-time revenue increases by selling ‘excess’ city property. A summary of the discussion is provided below:
Potential Development Pros Cons
Glen Oaks Golf Course35
x A significant source of one-time
revenue, roughly estimated at $12.5
million for the sale of the of the land,
for example, to a developer.
x Also, it is anticipated that the annual
property tax revenue, if the property
were developed into a residential
development for example, would
exceed the current leasing income.36
x The city would lose a public golf
course, an activity that many find as a
positive community attribute and the
development would significantly alter
the neighborhood, which may or may
not be welcome.
x The golf courses’ open space and
aesthetic qualities would be
significantly altered by a large-scale
development.
“San Jose tract”
(just north of the current
city yard)37
x Source of one-time revenue and
recurring property taxes if it was sold
and replaced by residential
development.
x It is estimated that some 30+ singlefamily residential homes could be built on this property.
x There are the concerns associated with
any proposed development to vacant
land and local impacts on the nearby
residents, traffic flow, etc.
South Hills
Wilderness Park38
x Significant source of one-time
revenue and recurring property taxes
if it was sold and replaced by
residential development.
x Large enough that some development
could take place and yet still retain its
general “open space” nature.
x There are concerns associated with any
development like this and local impacts
on the nearby residents.
x Open space and zoning issues.
Carlyle E. Linder
Equestrian Park39
x A source of one-time revenue and
recurring property taxes if it was sold
and replaced by residential
development.
x There are concerns associated with any
development like this and local impacts
on the nearby residents.
x Open space and zoning issues.
¾ It is recommended that the City Council and city staff recognize that the city has potential sources of one-time and ongoing (annual property tax) revenues depending on how the properties are utilized.
35 See: http://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=7230, specifically Section 3.2, page 3. “Glen Oaks Municipal Golf Course, located at the southwest corner of Glendora Avenue and Dawson Avenue provides a three-par, nine-hole golf course with night lighting, driving range and a putting practice green. A golf pro shop, coffee shop, community meeting room, restrooms are also located on-site, comprising approximately 19.79 acres. Glen Oaks Golf Course is under the same lease and shares facilities with the adjacent Dawson Park.”
36 The lease, with PW Golf Management initiated in 2009, was extended for an additional five years commencing July 1, 2019.
The lessee, it appears from the documentation, is responsible for improvements and upkeep. The city’s staff report dated April 24, 2019, notes 18.68 acres which differs from the “Open Space” report by a little more than an acre (see footnote no. 30 in that report). Also, refer to the April 24, 2019, City Council agenda’s staff report and supporting documentation. 37 The so-named “San Jose Tract,” is adjacent to the city yards and is approximately five acres in size and could accommodate up to 30 single family homes (from personal notes taken at the Aug. 16, 2018, Ad Hoc meeting with the information provided by city staff).
38 Op. cit.: p. 7. The South Hills Wilderness Area, designated as an open space, is comprised of 248.5 acres located north of the 210 Freeway, east of Glendora Avenue, West of Los Cerritos and south of Route 66. South Hills Park and the undeveloped northern terminus of Bonnie Cove Avenue provide access to the trail system of the South Hills Wilderness Park. 39 Ibid, p. 4. “Carlyle E. Linder Equestrian Park, located on Glendora Mountain Road and Boulder Springs Drive, is a 2.11-acre equestrian facility with a riding rink [and] training rink...” The Equestrian Park provides access to the primary equestrian trailhead for Big Dalton Wilderness Park.”
12 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Recommendations:
1. The committee concurred with the City Council’s course of action issuing Pension Obligation Bonds to address the City’s unfunded accrued liability [see page 7].
2. It is recommended that the City Council and city staff recognize that the city may have potential cost savings by outsourcing any of these four departments: Community Services, Library, Police, and, Public Works [see page 8].
3. Based upon this information, the committee was unanimous in its decision to present a preliminary report to the city council on Sep. 11, 2018 recommending that while the committee was still meeting, the city should immediately take steps to conduct a special election for a sales tax initiative. [See page 10; approved by the Council and approval granted by the citizens of Glendora on March 5, 2019]
4. The City Council is accountable to manage the City’s finances in a prudent manner; the committee recommends that the Council consider appointing a group of representative residents to review from time to time the expenditures of Measure E revenues. This advisory group would sunset after five years [see pages 8-10].
5. It is recommended that the City Council and city staff recognize that the city has potential sources of one-time and ongoing (annual property tax) revenues depending on how the properties are developed [see page 11].
Measure E Follow-up
The committee met after Measure E passed. While Measure E is a significant source of revenue for the city and will balance the structural deficit, the city still faces potential and significant financial issues.40 These include:
9 Infrastructure costs such as the streets being in need of repair/maintenance. In order to meet the best practices of street maintenance, some $60,000,000 would be needed. 9 The city faces a potential cost in the millions due to federal waste water compliance laws. 9 The economy will eventually go into a recession and that will affect sales tax revenues.
40 The ballot question for “Measure E” asked: “To maintain existing City services including public safety, youth/adult programs, fix streets/potholes, address quality of life issues, maintain library services, address rising pension costs, implement technology projects, and improve the financial health of the City, shall the Measure be adopted approving an ordinance enacting a threequarters percent (0.75%) transactions and use tax providing approximately $5,000,000 annually in general revenue, to be levied until ended by the voters with all funds staying local, for Glendora?” The vote was taken on March 5, 2019). The measure, to pass, required a majority of votes cast. With the final: “YES:” 3,524 [53.67%] to “NO:” 3,042 [46.33%]. See:
https://www.lavote.net/ElectionResults/Text/3983
13 IN SUMMARY
Like many surrounding cities, the City of Glendora takes a measure of civic pride in its ability to exercise prudent fiscal management and local control to maintain and enhance the quality of life for all Glendora residents, businesses, and those that work here and frequent our retail establishments.
The City of Glendora’s AD Hoc Committee has undertaken an in-depth budgeting overview, long-range financial planning, and, resource allocations discussions with city staff and outside experts. During our discussions, the Committee discussed a variety of topics, expenditure reductions, revenue enhancements, and potential outsourcing of city services. In the end, we could not guarantee that the services and benefits enjoyed by the residents could be maintained.
Also, the committee:
x Reviewed the budget and available fiscal resources—and how those resources are allocated to the city from the federal, state, the county governments and from local residents and local businesses.
x Reviewed and assessed current, past and future expenditures and revenues. This was done to identify or consider possible re-allocation or reduction of these revenues and expenditures. x The Committee acknowledges the City’s past practices of strong fiscal management including maintaining a high level of service with a fairly low city tax burden on the community compared to neighboring cities. Past actions include a reduction in staffing levels by 23% since 2009, which included a reduction in staffing of the Police Department by 14%.
The City has been diligent in its efforts to reduce pension related expenditures, by implementing lower benefit levels for new employee pension plans before it was required by the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act. PEPRA resulted in further reductions of pension benefits for new employees. Even with staffing reductions, service levels have remained fairly consistent across all departments.
x Had extensive in-depth discussions, with information provided by the city and outside experts, to ensure that our requests and questions were properly covered and that our ideas for solutions to City financial issues have the proper foundational support. x The Ad Hoc Committee was committed to provide the City Council and the residents with strong fiscal recommendations to help keep our City financially solvent and better positioned to react to external conditions not created or largely controlled by the City of Glendora x Our most significant recommendation was for the City Council to take bold action in quickly moving forward to place, what became known as Measure E, on the March 5, 2019 ballot.
This measure passed—but not by much!
x There are several longer-term recommendations that would require more detailed study and community input as future City Councils may need to consider additional revenue sources necessary to balance the City’s budget.
# # #
The Chair and Vice-Chair would like to acknowledge:
¾ The many hours each committee member spent in a number of meetings, asking questions, and earnestly seeking on their own time, information, and clarification as to what was best for the future of Glendora. ¾ We could not have done it without members of the Glendora City staff for their diligent efforts to answer questions, provide data, and assist us in keeping the process moving forward. ¾ We appreciate the City Council having the foresight to recognize that this issue needed to be reviewed and that any solutions offered be coordinated in a careful and thoughtful manner.
ATTACHMENT C
Draft City Council Decision Matrix – Infrastructure and Facilities Review Group This decision matrix is intended to guide City Council discussion on: (1) one-time funding; and (2) whether to establish a group to study the City's facilities and infrastructure needs, and if so, how that group should be structured, scoped, and guided financially and operationally.
Step Policy Question Options for Council Consideration Policy Implications 1 Does the City Council wish to
establish a group to study the City’s facilities and/or infrastructure needs? A. Yes – establish a review group
B. No – continue review through regular and
addition Council meetings C. Combination – City Council makes certain decisions now and established a review group to study specific issues/topics Establishing a group may allow deeper analysis and community input but extends the timeline. Handling within Council maintains speed and direct policy control. The City Council may also establish a workshop schedule to discuss a specific item (e.g. every third Tuesday of the month). 2 If yes, what structure should the
group have?
A. Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee B. City Council SubcommitteeC. Combination – Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee with City Council liaison(s)
Citizen Committee may increase public engagement and provide additional technical input. City Council Subcommittee allows more
direct Council oversight and faster coordination with staff. 2A If Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee: What
qualifications should applicants possess?
Experience in: • Large-scale infrastructure projects • Public Contracts / Prevailing Wage • Transportation / streets• Engineering or construction management• Finance / capital planning• Project management• Community representation Establishing qualifications ensures relevant expertise while maintaining community representation. 2B If Council Subcommittee: Who
should serve?
Two Councilmembers selected by Council consensus
Determines the level of Council leadership and responsibility for guiding the review. 3 What is the purpose and scope of
the group’s work?
A. Review of City facilities only B. Review facilities and streets/roads C. Conduct a comprehensive review of all major capital assets (facilities, streets/roads, water, etc.) A broader scope increases complexity and timeline. If only facilities are selected, City Council policy direction is needed on infrastructure priorities (e.g. streets vs facilities) 3A Should the group review previously
presented information?
A. Yes – review all facilities-related information
previously presented to Council, Library Board, and the public B. No – focus only on new or updated information
Reviewing prior material ensures continuity but may extend review time or the number of necessary public meetings.
ATTACHMENT C
Step Policy Question Options for Council Consideration Policy Implications 4 Should the group review the
adopted 2025–2027 Strategic Plan
and recommend modifications to infrastructure-related priorities? A. Yes – evaluate and recommend changes
B. No – maintain Strategic Plan priorities as
adopted
Provides staff clarify on alignment of infrastructure decisions with broader City Council priorities. 5 Should the group recommend
prioritization among infrastructure categories (e.g., streets vs facilities)? A. Yes – recommend prioritization
B. No – provide information only; prioritization
remains with Council
Prioritization recommendations may help guide funding decisions but involve policy tradeoffs. 6 What financial framework should
guide the review?
A. Focus only on projects fundable immediately with available one-time funds B. Evaluate all projects in the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Narrow financial scope allows quicker decisions; broader review supports long-term planning, but may delay certain projects
underway. Caution is advised on project delays, as recent CPI impacts are material. 7 What policy direction should guide
the use of one-time funding?
Direction may include: • Reserve some funding for future street projects• Reserve funding for facility improvements• Allocate all available funding now Determines long-term fiscal flexibility and project sequencing. 8 Is the City Council open to
allocating one-time funding toward
non-capital programs or initiatives?
A. Yes – allow some allocation to programs
B. No – limit one-time funds to capital infrastructure
projects
Clarifies whether one-time revenues should be strictly capital-focused. 8A How much funding should be
considered for use of one-time funds?
Council may specify a maximum amount or percentage of available one-time funds: A. $5 million an under (conservative) B. $5-8 million (moderate) C. $8-$12 million (moderate+) D. $12+ million (aggressive) Establishes fiscal guardrails for policy decisions. Options A & B would allow for future financial flexibility during economic downturn and likely does not impact bond rating. Option C allows for moderate financial flexibility during economic downturns (e.g. oneyear of flexibility). Option D limits flexibility on community service impacts and likely impacts bond ratings. 9 What is the desired timeline for the
group’s work and recommendations?
A. Short-term (3–4 months)
B. Medium-term (6–9 months)
C. Comprehensive review (12-24 months) D. Combination of timeframes depending on workplan of group.
Shorter timeline accelerates decisions but will limit analysis; longer timeline allows deeper evaluation. Generally, citizen ad-hoc groups have required between 9 months and two
years.
ONE TIME FUNDING & ADVISORY GROUP OPTIONS
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICECITY COUNCIL MEETINGMARCH 24, 2026ADAM RAYMOND, CITY MANAGER January 13, 2026
• Council requested discussion on use of one-time funds (city facility and civic center discussion) BACKGROUNDFebruary 24, 2026
• Council received report on one-time funding (Mid-Year Budget Update) o Motion from Council to Receive and File Reporto Staff agreed to return with information on advisory groupso No action taken on use of one-time funds Typically composed of residents who:
• Study specific issues or policy areas• Gather input, research, and community feedback• Provide recommendations to the City Council (or staff) on policies, plans, or programs• Generally, do not have significant decision-making authority (advisory, not legislative) Currently the City has several standing committees / boards: • Planning Commission• Water Commission• Library Board • Recreation and Human Services Commission• Business Improvement District (BID) Board
CITIZEN ADVISORY / AD-HOC GROUPS
These efforts require significant staffing resources, with coordinated community engagement Revenue Options & Expenditures Committee (2018 – 2020):
• Bi-monthly meetings: All information was publicly available (20 members)• Studied long-term fiscal challenges• Provided recommendations on revenue and cost strategies• Initial Recommendations in 2018 (Measure E)• Final Report issued in November 2019 (land sales, outsourcing, revenue measure, historical staff)• Last check-in with City Council in December 2020 (strategic plan)
RECENT CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEES
RECENT CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Antique Streetlight Advisory Panel (2022 – 2023):
• Regular meeting intervals: All information was publicly available, and meetings were broadcast (10 members) • Evaluated restoration feasibility• Provided recommendations regarding assessment district (targeted annual rate, additional city contribution of money)• Final vote on establishment of lighting district failed 35% to 65% (followed votes in 2007 and 2008)• Antique lights will be part of future project along Glendora Avenue leverage funding (restoration, first/last mile) Typically composed of two council members:
• Study specific issues or policy areas;• Gather input, research, and community feedback;• Provide recommendations to the City Council on policies, plans, or programs; and• Decision-making authority dependent on City Council direction for sub-committee• Brown Act issues with more than two members assigned to sub-committee
CITY COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEE
These efforts may require significant staffing resources depending on scope and depth of review Dale Affordable Housing Project with Mercy Housing (2025-2026):
• Mayor Pro-Tem Davis and Councilmember Allawos • Monthly meetings with staff and Mercy Housing• Field trips, review of housing product types, populations served, and fiscal challenges• Provided recommendations to City Council in furtherance of Mercy ENA (Phase I)
RECENT CITY COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEES
Option 1 – Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee:
• Additional community representation• Broader engagement and expertise (typically with new topics) POTENTIAL GOVERNANCE STRUCTURESOption 2 – City Council Subcommittee:
• Two councilmembers• Direct coordination with staff• Faster review process (generally) Option 3 – Hybrid Approach:
• Citizen committee with Council liaison (passive, not active engagement in meetings) Guide City Council discussion on:
• One-time Funding• Whether to establish a group to study the City’s facilities and infrastructure needs, and if so, how that group should be structured, scoped, and guided financially and operationally
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL DECISION MATRIX
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL DECISION MATRIX
Step Policy Question Options for Council Consideration Policy Implications 1 Does the City Council wish to establish a
group to study the City’s facilities and/or infrastructure needs? A. Yes – establish a review groupB. No – continue review through regular and addition Council meetings
C. Combination – City Council makes certain decisions now and established a review group to study specific issues/topics Establishing a group may allow deeper analysis and community input but extends the timeline. Handling within Council maintains speed and direct policy control. The City Council may also establish a workshop schedule to discuss a specific item (e.g. every third Tuesday of the month). 2 If yes, what structure should the group
have?
A. Citizen Ad-Hoc CommitteeB. City Council SubcommitteeC. Combination – Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee with City Council liaison(s)
Citizen Committee may increase public engagement and provide additional technical input. City Council Subcommittee allows more direct Council oversight and faster coordination with staff. 2A If Citizen Ad-Hoc Committee: What
qualifications should applicants possess?
Experience in:• Large-scale infrastructure projects• Public Contracts / Prevailing Wage • Transportation / streets• Engineering or construction management• Finance / capital planning• Project management• Community representation Establishing qualifications ensures relevant expertise while maintaining community representation. 2B If Council Subcommittee: Who should
serve?
Two Councilmembers selected by Council consensus Determines the level of Council leadership and responsibility for guiding the review.
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL DECISION MATRIX
Step Policy Question Options for Council Consideration Policy Implications 3 What is the purpose and scope of the
group’s work?
A. Review of City facilities onlyB. Review facilities and streets/roadsC. Conduct a comprehensive review of all major capital assets (facilities, streets/roads, water, etc.)
A broader scope increases complexity and timeline. If only facilities are selected, City Council policy direction is needed on infrastructure priorities (e.g. streets vs facilities) 3A Should the group review previously
presented information?
A. Yes – review all facilities-related information previously presented to Council, Library Board, and the public
B. No – focus only on new or updated information
Reviewing prior material ensures continuity but may extend review time or the number of necessary public meetings. 4 Should the group review the adopted 2025–
2027 Strategic Plan and recommend modifications to infrastructure-related priorities? A. Yes – evaluate and recommend changesB. No – maintain Strategic Plan priorities as adopted Provides staff clarity on alignment of infrastructure decisions with broader City Council priorities. 5 Should the group recommend prioritization
among infrastructure categories (e.g., streets vs facilities)? A. Yes – recommend prioritizationB. No – provide information only; prioritization remains with Council
Prioritization recommendations may help guide funding decisions but involve policy tradeoffs. 6 What financial framework should guide the
review?
A. Focus only on projects fundable immediately with
available one-time funds
B. Evaluate all projects in the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Narrow financial scope allows quicker decisions; broader review supports long-term planning but may delay certain projects underway. Caution is advised on project delays, as recent CPI impacts are material.
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL DECISION MATRIX
Step Policy Question Options for Council Consideration Policy Implications 7 What policy direction should guide the use
of one-time funding?
Direction may include:• Reserve some funding for future street projects• Reserve funding for facility improvements• Allocate all available funding now Determines long-term fiscal flexibility and project sequencing. 8 Is the City Council open to allocating onetime funding toward non-capital programs or initiatives?
A. Yes – allow some allocation to programsB. No – limit one-time funds to capital infrastructure projects Clarifies whether one-time revenues should be strictly capital-focused. 8A How much funding should be considered for
use of one-time funds?
Council may specify a maximum amount or percentage of available one-time funds:A. $5 million an under (conservative)B. $5-8 million (moderate)C. $8-$12 million (moderate+)D. $12+ million (aggressive) Establishes fiscal guardrails for policy decisions. Options A & B would allow for future financial flexibility during economic downturn and likely does not impact bond rating. Option C allows for moderate financial flexibility during economic downturns (e.g. one-year of flexibility). Option D limits flexibility on community service impacts and likely impacts bond ratings. 9 What is the desired timeline for the group’s
work and recommendations?
A. Short-term (3–4 months)B. Medium-term (6–9 months)C. Comprehensive review (12-24 months)D. Combination of timeframes depending on workplan of group.
Shorter timeline accelerates decisions but will limit analysis; longer timeline allows deeper evaluation. Generally, citizen ad-hoc groups have required between 9 months and two years.
COUNCIL DIRECTION
Fiscal Impact:
• There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendations in this report.• As City Council direction on the use of one-time funds is provided, staff will evaluate the fiscal impact of each policy decision on the City.
That City Council:
1.RECEIVE A REPORT ON CITIZEN AD-HOC COMMITTEES AND CITY COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEES AND PROVIDE DIRECTION, ASNECESSARY; AND
2.PROVIDE DIRECTION, AS NECESSARY, ON THE USE OF ONE-TIME FUNDS.
RECOMMENDATION
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: April 28, 2026
FROM: City Manager DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Workshop Framework and One-Time Funding Direction
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Provide direction on the make-up, focus, structure, and timing of the three workshops in the series;
2. Receive a presentation on available one-time funding, including total dollar amounts by category and budget cycle;
3. Provide direction on the priorities for the use of one-time funds, including but not limited to: current city facility upgrades and maintenance, streets and roads, and larger capital projects such as the Library and Corporate Yard;
4. Provide any other direction to staff as deemed appropriate.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 3: New + Revitalized Facilities
Goal 4: Sustainable Infrastructure
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 24, 2026, the City Council unanimously directed staff to conduct a series of three City Council workshops, one each month, to:
Evaluate the use of one-time funds,
Review current capital needs and facility conditions,
Explore funding options including grants and private financing, and Consider the potential formation, scope, and structure of a future advisory committee, if needed.
Staff is seeking additional direction on the make-up, focus, structure and timing the three workshops. Additionally staff is requesting additional direction on one-time funding, including total dollar amounts priorities for the use of those funds. This direction, if provided, will allow staff to provide a more comprehensive list of options for City Council consideration during the workshops.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
Date Action
5/21/26, 11:14 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee https://print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee 1/6 January 13, 2026
During a comprehensive city facility and civic center discussion, staff committed to returning with a broader conversation regarding one-time uses of available resources with the mid-year budget update.
February 24, 2026
City Council received a report on one-time funding. The City Council discussed the possibility of creating a citizen ad-hoc or City Council Sub-Committee to discuss capitalrelated matters. The City Council voted 5–0 to receive and file the report; no direction was given on the use of one-time funds. Staff pledged to return with information on advisory groups.
March 24, 2026
Staff presented a report on citizen ad-hoc committees, City Council Sub-Committees, and direction on the use of one-time funds. A motion to immediately fund the Corporate Yard in phases did not move forward. A subsequent motion by Councilmember Thompson, seconded by Mayor Fredendall, to conduct a series of three City Council workshops (one each month) passed unanimously 5–0. The workshops are to evaluate the use of one-time funds, review current capital needs and facility conditions, explore funding options including grants and private financing, and consider the potential formation, scope, and structure of a future advisory committee, if needed.
DISCUSSION
Workshop Series Framework
Staff recommends the following framework for the three-workshop series, consistent with the City Council's March 24, 2026 direction. After reviewing the comments by the City Council and reviewing the current status of various projects with applicable departments, staff is recommending the City Council consider workshops over the next 6-7 months in order to allow for current evaluations and assessments to be completed to ensure policy decisions are made with all available information. For example, staff is currently working with MHP Structural Engineers on an update to the 2023 Library Structural Assessment and with IDS Group, Inc. and Public Works staff on possible phasing of the Public Works Yard. Staff anticipates these reviews to be completed in late summer.
As presented, the draft schedule for workshops would also allow staff adequate time between workshops to complete works associated with City Council direction provided to staff at each workshop.
Workshop Recommended Focus
Workshop 1
(no later than
June 2026)
1. How We Got Here: Overview of strategic plans, community surveys, polling, infrastructure/facility needs and related information shared with the public over the past 5 years.
2. One-Time Funding:
a. Finalized dollar amount
b. Adopted list of specific projects
c. Timelines
5/21/26, 11:14 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee https://print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee 2/6 Workshop Recommended Focus
Workshop 2
(no later than
September 2026)
1. Library
a. Historical Overview
b. Recap of Repairs and Structural Assessments
c. Updated Structural Assessment
d. Estimated Costs
e. Continuation of services during a project
f. Funding Options
2. Public Works Yard
a. Historical Overview
b. Update of Construction Drawings and Environmental Work c. Possible Phasing Opportunities / Service Delivery Impacts d. Funding Options
3. Follow-up from Workshop 1
Workshop 3
(no later than
December 2026)
1. Funding Options
a. Grants
b. Land Sales
c. Issuance of Debt
d. Other
2. Potential Formation of a Future Advisory Committee
a. Scope, structure, and timing of a future citizen advisory committee
3. Follow-up from Workshops 1 & 2
4. Next Steps
Available One-Time Funding
On February 24, 2026, staff presented a comprehensive overview of anticipated one-time discretionary funding opportunities. The following table summarizes the available one-time funding by category and budget cycle; the amounts represent categorical totals that exist across several funds, including the General Fund, Measure E/Z, GUSD JUA, and Pension Reserve. Further, totals are additive. If no action was taken, at the end of FY 2031, estimated one-time available funds would be $41,169,000. A detailed breakdown of these amounts is included on Attachment A.
Funding Source FY 2025–27 FY 2027–29 FY 2029–31
Available Fund Balance/Reserve $6,860,000 $569,000 $260,000 Reallocation of CIP / Re-prioritization of
Projects
$1,900,000 — —
Property Sales $5,120,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Pension Set Aside $13,820,000 $240,000 $180,000
OPEB Set Aside $4,080,000 $80,000 $60,000
TOTALS $31,780,000 $4,889,000 $4,500,000
5/21/26, 11:14 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee https://print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee 3/6 Fiscal Guardrails for One-Time Funding
The March 24, 2026 staff report presented a Decision Matrix with options for the amount of one-time funding the City Council may wish to consider. The amounts below are available for use now. Generally, impacts from the use of one-time funding include: limited operational flexibility during future economic downturns; diminished ability to address one-time infrastructure issues; and potential downgrade of bond rating resulting in increased borrowing costs.
Option Amount Policy Implications
A – Conservative $5 million and under
Allows for future financial flexibility
during economic downturn; likely
does not impact bond rating
B – Moderate $5–$8 million
Allows for future financial flexibility
during economic downturn; likely
does not impact bond rating
C – Moderate+ $8–$12 million
Allows for moderate financial
flexibility during economic
downturns (e.g., one year of
flexibility)
D – Aggressive $12+ million
Limits flexibility on community
service impacts and likely impacts
bond ratings
Depending on the amount selected, staff can make recommendations on where those funds would come from, and what strategies can be used to replace them, if possible. For example, if the City Council selected $10 million in one-time funding, a possible allocation could be:
Amount Source of Funding
$1,000,000 General Fund Reserve
$2,000,000 Measure E/Z Fund Balance
$2,100,000 San Jose Sale
$4,000,000
Pension Reserve. Direction could be given to replenish funding with a future local agency property development anticipated in the FY 2027- 2029 two-year budget cycle.
$900,000 Reallocation of CIP
$10,000,000 TOTAL
Priority Categories for One-Time Funding
Since 2018, the City has implemented broad organizational and operational reforms to modernize service delivery, improve efficiency, and address long-standing deferred maintenance. Key changes included restructuring departments, centralizing functions, outsourcing landscape maintenance, and creating a dedicated Building Services Division. These efforts reduced costs - most notably saving over $500,000 annually in landscape services - while increasing service levels, improving coordination, and enabling a more proactive approach to maintaining parks, streets, and facilities. Staffing was strategically realigned, with total positions reduced from 18 to 16, while shifting resources toward field operations and direct service delivery, allowing the City to do more with fewer overall staff.
5/21/26, 11:14 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee https://print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee 4/6 Savings and efficiencies were reinvested into critical infrastructure, significantly increasing funding for facilities, streets, and maintenance programs. Facilities spending grew from about $350,000 in 2018 to $1.4 million annually today, while non-major project street maintenance and pavement preservation programs expanded from approximately $15,000 in 2018 to $1,000,000 in the current budget, to improve long-term roadway conditions.
Overall, the City has increased net annual maintenance-related investment by approximately $2 million annually, reflecting a deliberate policy to reinvest in core assets. While meaningful progress has been made, the City continues to face ongoing challenges related to decades of deferred maintenance.
Staff recommends the City Council discuss and provide direction, if possible, on priorities for the use of one-time funds. Based on prior City Council discussions and community input, the following categories are presented for consideration of prioritization.
Current City Facility Upgrades/Maintenance
Deferred maintenance on City facilities is estimated at approximately $50 million, with an investment of more than $250 million needed to bring facilities to levels that would provide for modern work-spaces and greater accessibility to the public. Facility Condition Assessments conducted by Bureau Veritas identified deficiencies across multiple City facilities, including roofing, exterior walls, electrical systems, HVAC, and parking lots.
The conversation on facilities needs over the past five years has been robust, and while the City has made significant strides, under investment and lack of more dedicated funding will continue to strain the City's ability to more thoroughly address its facilities.
Streets/Roads
Community surveys consistently identify streets and infrastructure among the City's most pressing challenges. The City has made generational investments in infrastructure over the past seven years, including improved street conditions with an upward Pavement Condition Index (PCI) trend, reversing decades of decline. However, decades of under-investment cannot be reversed overnight - the City Council has identified a need for an additional $3-$3.5 million in annual funding to improve streets from a PCI of 63 to a PCI of 70.
Larger Capital Projects
Library: The MHP Structural Engineers Library Structural Assessment and Visioning Study identified significant structural and seismic deficiencies, aging mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and building envelope limitations that materially affect the Library's long-term viability. In 2023 these costs were estimated at $8.5 million.
Community survey results showed that residents place a high value on infrastructure investment, though a Libraryonly measure received comparatively lower support (45%) than a citywide facilities measure (53%). Currently, the City is working with MHP Structural Engineers on an update to the 2023 report, which will more fully incorporate past structural assessments from the 1980's and significant work done in 2003 and 2004. Additionally, the report will included updated cost estimates, including seismic/structural improvements needed for the City's emergency operations center to remain at the location. In line with City Council direction, staff is currently working with the State on a budget appropriation to help address more than 50 years of documented facility issues.
Corporate Yard: The City Corporate Yard at 1250 Vladimir Street houses the Streets, Facilities, and Fleet Divisions, with plans to relocate the Parks, Trees, and Landscape Division to the site. A facility assessment determined that existing buildings are outdated and obsolete, with inadequate restrooms and insufficient office, training, and nonexistent traffic management system space. The recommendation was to demolish existing buildings and construct four new buildings totaling approximately 18,310 square feet. The grand total construction cost estimate, including bonds and escalation, was approximately $12.6 million. The City Yard Improvements are budgeted in the City's 5- year Capital Improvement Program, with $1,046,650 budgeted for FY 2025. The City Council approved a Professional Service Agreement with IDS Group, Inc. in the amount of $725,581 for design and construction documents. At this time, no funding source exists for the completion of the construction phase and staff is working to find solutions for a phased approach.
FISCAL IMPACT
5/21/26, 11:14 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee https://print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee 5/6 There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendations in this report. As City Council direction on the use of one-time funds is provided, staff will evaluate the fiscal impact of each policy decision on the City.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There is no CEQA impacts associated with the recommendations in this report. As City Council direction on onetime funding and larger projects is provided, staff will evaluate possible CEQA impacts Prepared By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Moises Lopez, Assistant City Manager
Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A. Discretionary One-time Funding FINAL.pdf
B_PowerPoint.pdf
5/21/26, 11:14 AM print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee https://print.agendalink.app/v6/glendoraca/69d83bdde1de0e00439e08ee 6/6 Anticiapted One-Time Discretionary Funding Opportunities Attachment A FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 FY 2025-27 FY 2027-29 FY 2029-31 Available Fund
Balance/Reserve $ 6,860,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000
In Excess of Policy 1
$ 2,280,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000
45%
30% $ 4,580,000
Reallocation of CIP $ 1,900,000 $ - $ -
Reprioritization of Projects $ 1,000,000
GUSD Pool 2
$ 900,000
Property Sales $ 5,120,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
San Jose 3
$ 2,990,000
Dale 4
$ 2,130,000
Other Local Agency
Development 5
$ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
Pension Set Aside $ 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000
Section 115 Trust 6
$ 6,090,000
Reserve 7
$ 7,730,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000
OPEB Set Aside $ 4,080,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000
Section 115 Trust 6
$ 2,060,000
Reserve 7
$ 2,020,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000
Grand Totals $ 13,780,000 $ 4,080,000 $ 4,060,000 $ 13,820,000 $ 240,000 $ 180,000 $ 2,280,000 $ 569,000 $ 260,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 31,780,000 $ 4,889,000 $ 4,500,000 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 These funds are generally restricted. Currently, these funds have been set aside for investment in the Section 115 Trusts as cash on hand/liquidity allows through the City Council Adopted General Fund Reserve Policy. The monies may be accessed immediately by the City until they are invested in the Section 115 Trusts, at which time they may only be used to offset future/current pension liabilities. See note 6 with respect to pension and OPEB liabilities outstanding.
NOTES
Category: One-Time
Discretionary Funding
Staff anticipated an estimated $2.1 million to be received by June 30, 2027 for the sale of the Dale site. This funding will be dependent upon approval of a development in accordance with the City's standards and actions by the Planning Commission and City Council.
GUSD JUA
105 301
Capital Projects Totals
101
General Fund
102
Pension
103
Measures E/Z
The General Fund reserve policy is a minimum of 30% to maximum of 45% of prior year operational expenditures. Total of $4.6 million is the amount in excess of the reserve minimum (30%). The amount in the Measure E/Z fund balance is available in it's entirety ($2.3 million). The City's Reserve Policy provides the City Council time to make decisions in economic downturns or funding loss from the State of California without significant impacts to service delivery to the community. Further this funding provides a stabilization to meet debt requirements, which partially resulted in the City's AAA bond ratings. Per the existing financial policies of the City Council, when General Fund revenues exceed expenditures it allows the City to set aside monies in reserve, future capital projects, stabilization of CalPERS pension/OPEB costs, as well as general liabilities, worker's compensation, fleet maintenance and technology costs. More specifically, when revenues exceed expenditures, the City's financial policies allocated that amount at the following percentages 50% to the Capital Projects Fund, 30% to the PERS Rate Stabilization Fund, 10% to OPEB Section 115 Trust (held in General Fund) and 10% to Internal Service Funds.
The City and Glendora Unified School District (GUSD) have a long history of partnering on community assets (e.g. middle school parks, high school pool, etc.). GUSD has a current pool renovation project, in which the CIty has contributed $600,000 to the $3.9 million dollar project. Additionally, the City Council approved an additional contribution of up to $900,000 that is dependent on the City's financial performance through June 30, 2027.
The sale of the San Jose site provided the City with $3.99 million. The City Council previously allocated $1 million of these proceeds to achieve initiatives in the City's strategic and economic development action plans (8/27/2024).
These funds are generally restructured and may only be used to pay for CalPERS retirement costs (Pension) or reimburse qualifying retired employees' medical premiums (OPEB). The monies may be accessed by the City to pay for specific liabilities, requiring certification of the expense. Currently, the City's CalPERS unfunded accrued liability (UAL) is $21.7 million, which is anticipated to be reduced to $10.3 million next year with CalPERS better than anticipated asset returns. Additionally, the City has an other post employment benefits (OPEB) liability of approximately $5.6 million. Finally, the City has an outstanding pension obligation bond principal amount of approximately $51 million.
Amounts represent possible funding received through sale and development of land owned other local agencies over the next five years.
WORKSHOP SERIES DIRECTION & ONE-TIME FUNDING
PRIORITIES
CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 28, 2026
ADAM RAYMOND, CITY MANAGER
RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Provide direction on the make-up, focus, structure, and timing of the three workshops in the series;
2. Receive a presentation on available one-time funding, including total dollar amounts by category and budget cycle;
3. Provide direction on priorities for the use of one-time funds — including current city facility upgrades and maintenance, streets and roads, and larger capital projects; and
4. Provide any other direction to staff as deemed appropriate.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ON MARCH 24, 2026, COUNCIL
UNANIMOUSLY DIRECTED STAFF TO
CONDUCT THREE MONTHLY
WORKSHOPS
• Evaluate the use of one-time funds
• Review current capital needs and facility
conditions
• Explore funding options including grants
and private financing
• Consider potential formation of a future
advisory committee
Staff is seeking direction on workshop focus,
timing, and one-time funding priorities.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
JANUARY 13, 2026
CIVIC CENTER
DISCUSSION
Staff committed to
returning with a broader
conversation on one-time
uses of available
resources.
FEBRUARY 24, 2026
ONE-TIME FUNDING
REPORT
Council received report;
voted 5–0 to receive and
file. No direction given on
use of funds.
MARCH 24, 2026
WORKSHOP SERIES
APPROVED
Council unanimously
directed staff (5–0) to
conduct three monthly
workshops.
WORKSHOP SERIES
FRAMEWORK
Workshop 1 — No later than June
2026
HOW WE GOT HERE
• OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIC PLANS,
COMMUNITY SURVEYS, POLLING, AND
INFRASTRUCTURE/FACILITY NEEDS SHARED
WITH THE PUBLIC OVER THE PAST 5 YEARS
ONE-TIME FUNDING
• FINALIZED DOLLAR AMOUNT
• ADOPTED LIST OF SPECIFIC PROJECTS
• TIMELINES
Workshop 2 — No later than
September 2026
LIBRARY
• HISTORICAL OVERVIEW, RECAP OF REPAIRS,
UPDATED STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT,
ESTIMATED COSTS, CONTINUATION OF
SERVICES, FUNDING OPTIONS
PUBLIC WORKS YARD
• HISTORICAL OVERVIEW, UPDATE OF
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND
ENVIRONMENTAL WORK, POSSIBLE PHASING
OPPORTUNITIES, FUNDING OPTIONS
FOLLOW-UP FROM WORKSHOP 1
WORKSHOPS 1 & 2
FUNDING OPTIONS
• GRANTS
• LAND SALES
• ISSUANCE OF DEBT
• OTHER OPTIONS
POTENTIAL FUTURE ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
• SCOPE, STRUCTURE, AND TIMING OF A
FUTURE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FOLLOW-UP & NEXT STEPS
• FOLLOW-UP FROM WORKSHOPS 1 & 2
• IMPLEMENTATION NEXT STEPS
WORKSHOP 3 — NO LATER THAN DECEMBER
2026
AVAILABLE ONE-TIME
FUNDING
AVAILABLE ONE-TIME FUNDING
Funding Source FY 2025–27 FY 2027–29 FY 2029–31
Available Fund Balance / Reserve $6,860,000 $569,000 $260,000 Reallocation of CIP / Re-prioritization $1,900,000 — —
Property Sales $5,120,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Pension Set-Aside $13,820,000 $240,000 $180,000
OPEB Set-Aside $4,080,000 $80,000 $60,000
TOTALS* $31,780,000 $4,889,000 $4,500,000
* Totals are additive. For example, if no action was taken, at the end of FY 2031, estimated one-time available funds would be $41,169,000
* Totals span the General Fund, Measure E/A, GUSD JUA, and Pension Reserve. See Attachment A for detailed breakdown.
Lower-Risk Options
OPTION A — CONSERVATIVE (≤ $5M)
• PRESERVES FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY
DURING DOWNTURNS
• LIKELY NO BOND RATING IMPACT
OPTION B — MODERATE ($5M–$8M)
• PRESERVES FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY DURING
DOWNTURNS
• LIKELY NO BOND RATING IMPACT
Higher-Impact Options
OPTION C — MODERATE+ ($8M–$12M)
• ALLOWS MODERATE FLEXIBILITY DURING
DOWNTURNS (~1 YEAR)
• LIKELY NO BOND RATING IMPACT
OPTION D — AGGRESSIVE ($12M+)
• LIMITS SERVICE FLEXIBILITY; MAY IMPACT BOND
RATINGS
• MAY REDUCE FUTURE CAPACITY FOR
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS
FISCAL GUARDRAILS — FOUR OPTIONS
EXAMPLE: $10 MILLION ALLOCATION
• ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
• PENDING COUNCIL DIRECTION ON
TARGET AMOUNT AND PRIORITIES
• PENSION RESERVE DRAW COULD BE
REPLENISHED THROUGH FUTURE
LOCAL-AGENCY PROPERTY
DEVELOPMENT IN FY 2027–29
SAMPLE $10M ALLOCATION
Amount Source of Funding
$1,000,000 General Fund Reserve
$2,000,000 Measure E/Z Fund Balance
$2,100,000 San Jose Sale
$4,000,000 Pension Reserve
$900,000 Reallocation of CIP
$10,000,000 TOTAL
PRIORITY CATEGORIES
ORGANIZATIONAL & OPERATIONAL
REFORMS
• RESTRUCTURED DEPARTMENTS AND
CENTRALIZED FUNCTIONS
• OUTSOURCED LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE — SAVING $500K+
ANNUALLY
• CREATED A DEDICATED BUILDING
SERVICES DIVISION
• INCREASED SERVICE LEVELS AND
IMPROVED COORDINATION
STRATEGIC STAFFING
REALIGNMENT
• TOTAL POSITIONS REDUCED FROM 18 TO
16 • RESOURCES SHIFTED TOWARD FIELD
OPERATIONS AND DIRECT SERVICE
DELIVERY
• ENABLED A MORE PROACTIVE
APPROACH TO MAINTAINING PARKS,
STREETS, AND FACILITIES
• DOING MORE WITH FEWER OVERALL
STAFF
REFORM & EFFICIENCY SINCE 2018
FACILITIES SPENDING
• $350K IN 2018 → $1.4M ANNUALLY
TODAY
STREET MAINTENANCE & PAVEMENT
PRESERVATION
• NON-MAJOR PROJECT PROGRAMS
GREW FROM $15K IN 2018 TO $1M IN THE
CURRENT BUDGET
• TARGETED TO IMPROVE LONG-TERM
ROADWAY CONDITIONS
NET ANNUAL INVESTMENT
• INCREASED BY APPROXIMATELY $2
MILLION ANNUALLY
PROGRESS & REMAINING
CHALLENGES
• REFLECTS A DELIBERATE POLICY TO
REINVEST IN CORE ASSETS
• MEANINGFUL PROGRESS MADE — BUT
DECADES OF DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
REMAIN
COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
• DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION, IF
POSSIBLE, ON PRIORITIES FOR THE USE
OF ONE-TIME FUNDS
• CATEGORIES PRESENTED ARE BASED ON
PRIOR COUNCIL DISCUSSIONS AND
COMMUNITY INPUT
REINVESTMENT IN CORE ASSETS
Current City Facility Upgrades /
Maintenance
• $50 MILLION IN DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE ON CITY FACILITIES
• $250 MILLION+ NEEDED TO
MODERNIZE WORKSPACES AND
IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCESSIBILITY
• BUREAU VERITAS FACILITY CONDITION
ASSESSMENTS IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES
IN ROOFING, EXTERIOR WALLS,
ELECTRICAL, HVAC, AND PARKING LOTS
• SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS MADE;
CONTINUED UNDER-INVESTMENT WILL
STRAIN FUTURE CAPACITY
Streets & Roads
• CONSISTENTLY IDENTIFIED IN
COMMUNITY SURVEYS AS A TOP
PRIORITY
• GENERATIONAL INVESTMENT OVER PAST
SEVEN YEARS; UPWARD PCI TREND
REVERSING DECADES OF DECLINE
• $3–$3.5 MILLION ANNUALLY IN
ADDITIONAL FUNDING NEEDED TO MOVE
PCI FROM 63 TO 70
• DECADES OF UNDER-INVESTMENT
CANNOT BE REVERSED OVERNIGHT
FACILITIES & STREETS
LIBRARY
• MHP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS IDENTIFIED
SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURAL AND SEISMIC
DEFICIENCIES, AGING MEP SYSTEMS, AND
BUILDING ENVELOPE LIMITATIONS
• 2023 ESTIMATE: $8.5 MILLION IN STRUCTURAL
AND MECHINAL UPGRAGES; UPDATED
ASSESSMENT AND COSTS IN PROGRESS
• UPDATED REPORT WILL INCLUDE SEISMIC/STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS TO
PRESERVE THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
CENTER
• COMMUNITY SURVEY: 45% SUPPORT LIBRARYONLY MEASURE VS. 53% FOR CITYWIDE
FACILITIES
• STAFF WORKING WITH THE STATE ON A
BUDGET APPROPRIATION
CORPORATE YARD
• 1250 VLADIMIR STREET: HOUSES STREETS, FACILITIES, FLEET; PARKS/TREES/LANDSCAPE
TO BE RELOCATED TO SITE
• ASSESSMENT: EXISTING BUILDINGS
OUTDATED AND OBSOLETE; INADEQUATE
RESTROOMS, OFFICE, AND TRAINING SPACE
• RECOMMENDATION: DEMOLISH AND REBUILD
FOUR NEW BUILDINGS TOTALING ~18,310 SQ
FT
• CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE: ~$12.6 MILLION
• IDS GROUP DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AGREEMENT ($725,581)
APPROVED
• NO FUNDING SOURCE IDENTIFIED FOR
CONSTRUCTION; STAFF EXPLORING PHASED
APPROACH
LARGER CAPITAL PROJECTS — LIBRARY &
CORPORATE YARD
REQUESTED DIRECTION
Staff respectfully requests City Council direction on:
1. Workshop Series — Confirm make-up, focus, structure, and timing of the three workshops.
2. One-Time Funding — Select a target amount (Options A–D) or other amount.
3. Priorities — Indicate priorities across facility upgrades, streets & roads, and larger capital projects.
4. Other Direction — Any additional direction to staff as deemed appropriate.
No fiscal impact associated with the recommendations. Fiscal and CEQA impacts of specific policy decisions will be evaluated as direction is provided.
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Location Amount
Big Dalton Canyon - Girl Scout Cabin
Big Dalton Canyon - Girl Scout Cabin
Immediate 4,200 $
1-2 Years 24,200 $
3-5 Years 21,800 $
6-10 Years 27,600 $
11-20 Years 485,200 $
Big Dalton Canyon - Girl Scout Cabin Total 563,000 $
Big Dalton Canyon - Girl Scout Cabin Total 563,000 $
Big Dalton Canyon Park Campground
Restroom Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 15,000 $
6-10 Years 13,000 $
11-20 Years 58,400 $
Restroom Building: Total 86,400 $
Big Dalton Canyon Park Campground Total 86,400 $
Big Dalton Canyon Park Daycamp/Restrooms
Site:
Immediate 11,200 $
1-2 Years 11,400 $
3-5 Years 1,000 $
6-10 Years 15,000 $
11-20 Years 14,400 $
Site: Total 53,000 $
Restroom Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 12,500 $
3-5 Years 80,300 $
6-10 Years 3,600 $
11-20 Years 14,800 $
Restroom Building: Total 111,200 $
Daycamp Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 8,900 $
3-5 Years 60,400 $
6-10 Years 24,600 $
11-20 Years 12,000 $
Daycamp Building: Total 105,900 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 1 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Big Dalton Canyon Park Daycamp/Restrooms Total 270,100 $ Big Dalton Garage/Residences
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 22,600 $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 32,700 $
11-20 Years 30,400 $
Site: Total 85,700 $
Garage
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 1,700 $
11-20 Years 15,900 $
Garage Total 17,600 $
Residence 1:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 24,700 $
3-5 Years 16,400 $
6-10 Years 49,200 $
11-20 Years 80,600 $
Residence 1: Total 170,900 $
Residence 2:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 14,400 $
3-5 Years 12,500 $
6-10 Years 13,500 $
11-20 Years 70,500 $
Residence 2: Total 110,900 $
Big Dalton Garage/Residences Total 385,100 $
Centennial Heritage Park Facilities
Site:
Immediate 2,200 $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 1,000 $
6-10 Years 49,300 $
11-20 Years 62,400 $
Site: Total 114,900 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 2 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Citrus Snack Stand:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 1,000 $
6-10 Years 11,900 $
11-20 Years 4,800 $
Citrus Snack Stand: Total 17,700 $
Englehart Shed:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 3,100 $
6-10 Years 22,300 $
11-20 Years 19,000 $
Englehart Shed: Total 44,400 $
Hamilton House:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 6,600 $
3-5 Years 5,100 $
6-10 Years 69,500 $
11-20 Years 241,600 $
Hamilton House: Total 322,800 $
Print Shop Barn:
Immediate 1,600 $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 7,200 $
6-10 Years 5,900 $
11-20 Years 54,100 $
Print Shop Barn: Total 68,800 $
Storage Shed:
Immediate 600 $
1-2 Years 1,500 $
3-5 Years 3,100 $
6-10 Years 1,200 $
11-20 Years 25,900 $
Storage Shed: Total 32,300 $
Centennial Heritage Park Facilities Total 600,900 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 3 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
City Hall
City Hall
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 553,700 $
3-5 Years 390,400 $
6-10 Years 1,396,000 $
11-20 Years 1,590,600 $
City Hall Total 3,930,700 $
City Hall Total 3,930,700 $
City Hall Complex/Police/Library
City Library
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 620,600 $
3-5 Years 336,300 $
6-10 Years 603,700 $
11-20 Years 4,545,200 $
City Library Total 6,105,800 $
Police Station – IT Office/Storage Unit
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 6,200 $
6-10 Years 71,100 $
11-20 Years 84,700 $
Police Station – IT Office/Storage Unit Total 162,000 $ Police Station – Police Station:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 6,900 $
3-5 Years 11,600 $
6-10 Years 572,600 $
11-20 Years 1,380,800 $
Police Station – Police Station: Total 1,971,900 $
Police Station – Traffic Office
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 5,800 $
6-10 Years 56,200 $
11-20 Years 101,100 $
Police Station – Traffic Office Total 163,100 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 4 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 145,500 $
3-5 Years 11,200 $
6-10 Years 52,700 $
11-20 Years 601,100 $
Site: Total 810,500 $
City Hall Complex/Police/Library Total 9,213,300 $
Corporate Yard Fleet/Gas/Paint & Sign
Fleet Services:
Immediate 6,500 $
1-2 Years 50,000 $
3-5 Years 16,800 $
6-10 Years 73,200 $
11-20 Years 85,300 $
Fleet Services: Total 231,800 $
Paint & Sign Shop:
Immediate 13,100 $
1-2 Years 117,300 $
3-5 Years 64,800 $
6-10 Years 180,000 $
11-20 Years 121,900 $
Paint & Sign Shop: Total 497,100 $
Pump Station:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 42,200 $
11-20 Years 69,500 $
Pump Station: Total 111,700 $
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 166,300 $
3-5 Years 5,100 $
6-10 Years 59,700 $
11-20 Years 208,800 $
Site: Total 439,900 $
Corporate Yard Fleet/Gas/Paint & Sign Total 1,280,500 $ Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 5 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Corporate Yard Office/Garage/Locker Building
Site:
Immediate 1,500 $
1-2 Years 80,400 $
3-5 Years 2,100 $
6-10 Years 30,100 $
11-20 Years 30,000 $
Site: Total 144,100 $
Locker Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 25,600 $
6-10 Years 96,000 $
11-20 Years 228,800 $
Locker Building: Total 350,400 $
Office/Garage
Immediate 4,500 $
1-2 Years 118,200 $
3-5 Years 41,800 $
6-10 Years 226,100 $
11-20 Years 183,700 $
Office/Garage Total 574,300 $
Corporate Yard Office/Garage/Locker Building Total 1,068,800 $ Crowther Teen and Family Center
Crowther Teen and Family Center
Immediate 2,000 $
1-2 Years 173,300 $
3-5 Years 292,600 $
6-10 Years 3,035,800 $
11-20 Years 3,645,000 $
Crowther Teen and Family Center Total 7,148,700 $
Crowther Teen and Family Center Total 7,148,700 $
Finkbiner Park Facilities
American Legion Hall
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 2,200 $
6-10 Years 354,600 $
11-20 Years 1,011,000 $
American Legion Hall Total 1,367,800 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 6 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Band Shell with Storage
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 22,400 $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 4,900 $
11-20 Years 35,500 $
Band Shell with Storage Total 62,800 $
Checkout Restrooms
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 15,400 $
11-20 Years 681,000 $
Checkout Restrooms Total 696,400 $
Lobb Field Restrooms Snack Bar
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 24,000 $
3-5 Years 85,800 $
6-10 Years 42,500 $
11-20 Years 54,100 $
Lobb Field Restrooms Snack Bar Total 206,400 $
Finkbiner Park Facilities Total 2,333,400 $
Finkbiner Park Liberty House/Restrooms
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 21,800 $
3-5 Years 2,400 $
6-10 Years 26,500 $
11-20 Years 147,700 $
Site: Total 198,400 $
Liberty House:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 12,200 $
6-10 Years 71,000 $
11-20 Years 74,600 $
Liberty House: Total 157,800 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 7 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Restroom Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 4,000 $
6-10 Years 1,900 $
11-20 Years 40,300 $
Restroom Building: Total 46,200 $
Finkbiner Park Liberty House/Restrooms Total 402,400 $
Finkbiner Park Rotary Scout Hut/Youth Center
Rotary Scout Hut:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 25,700 $
6-10 Years 52,900 $
11-20 Years 323,100 $
Rotary Scout Hut: Total 401,700 $
Youth Center:
Immediate 11,200 $
1-2 Years 10,800 $
3-5 Years 101,900 $
6-10 Years 61,500 $
11-20 Years 335,200 $
Youth Center: Total 520,600 $
Finkbiner Park Rotary Scout Hut/Youth Center Total 922,300 $ Gladstone Park Restrooms
Gladstone Park Restrooms
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 2,300 $
3-5 Years 35,100 $
6-10 Years 492,800 $
11-20 Years 242,000 $
Gladstone Park Restrooms Total 772,200 $
Gladstone Park Restrooms Total 772,200 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 8 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Historical Society Museum
Historical Society Museum
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 21,700 $
3-5 Years 17,100 $
6-10 Years 179,400 $
11-20 Years 715,200 $
Historical Society Museum Total 933,400 $
Historical Society Museum Total 933,400 $
La Fetra Senior Center
La Fetra Senior Center
Immediate 11,500 $
1-2 Years 49,900 $
3-5 Years 869,200 $
6-10 Years 539,100 $
11-20 Years 3,041,900 $
La Fetra Senior Center Total 4,511,600 $
La Fetra Senior Center Total 4,511,600 $
Louie Pompei Memorial Sports Park Facilities
Maintenance Shed Restroom:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 46,200 $
6-10 Years 4,200 $
11-20 Years 163,300 $
Maintenance Shed Restroom: Total 213,700 $
Snack Bar Restroom:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 6,200 $
3-5 Years 77,500 $
6-10 Years 2,800 $
11-20 Years 196,400 $
Snack Bar Restroom: Total 282,900 $
Louie Pompei Memorial Sports Park Facilities Total 496,600 $ Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 9 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Municipal Golf Course Facilities
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 81,400 $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 365,400 $
11-20 Years 2,972,000 $
Site: Total 3,418,800 $
Restroom Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 21,600 $
11-20 Years 30,900 $
Restroom Building: Total 52,500 $
Maintenance Shed:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 65,000 $
6-10 Years 34,600 $
11-20 Years 54,700 $
Maintenance Shed: Total 154,300 $
Pro Shop:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 59,200 $
6-10 Years 95,900 $
11-20 Years 144,400 $
Pro Shop: Total 299,500 $
Municipal Golf Course Facilities Total 3,925,100 $
Old Chamber of Commerce
Old Chamber of Commerce
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 15,800 $
3-5 Years 16,400 $
6-10 Years 67,100 $
11-20 Years 186,600 $
Old Chamber of Commerce Total 285,900 $
Old Chamber of Commerce Total 285,900 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 10 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Parks Yard
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 165,700 $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 52,400 $
11-20 Years 87,900 $
Site: Total 306,000 $
Parks Yard - Storage:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 5,200 $
11-20 Years 52,500 $
Parks Yard - Storage: Total 57,700 $
Public Works – Admin Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 41,600 $
6-10 Years 106,800 $
11-20 Years 210,200 $
Public Works – Admin Building: Total 358,600 $
Storage Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 5,700 $
11-20 Years 7,900 $
Storage Building: Total 13,600 $
Parks Yard Total 735,900 $
Pay N Play Racquetball
Pay N Play Racquetball
Immediate 15,100 $
1-2 Years 23,600 $
3-5 Years 372,500 $
6-10 Years 496,300 $
11-20 Years 254,300 $
Pay N Play Racquetball Total 1,161,800 $
Pay N Play Racquetball Total 1,161,800 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 11 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
San Gabriel Water Yard/Plant
Site:
Immediate 2,200 $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 67,100 $
6-10 Years 65,400 $
11-20 Years 1,429,900 $
Site: Total 1,564,600 $
Plant – Well building NO.12E
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 23,000 $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 35,700 $
11-20 Years 43,300 $
Plant – Well building NO.12E Total 102,000 $
Well Shed NO.8E
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 1,700 $
6-10 Years 300 $
11-20 Years 14,000 $
Well Shed NO.8E Total 16,000 $
Well Shed NO.9E
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 1,700 $
6-10 Years 5,100 $
11-20 Years 8,800 $
Well Shed NO.9E Total 15,600 $
Yard – New Booster Building and Boosters
Immediate 15,600 $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 506,200 $
6-10 Years 64,300 $
11-20 Years 1,205,500 $
Yard – New Booster Building and Boosters Total 1,791,600 $ Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 12 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Yard – New Warehouse
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 2,800 $
3-5 Years 27,600 $
6-10 Years 27,800 $
11-20 Years 163,500 $
Yard – New Warehouse Total 221,700 $
Yard – Storage Building
Immediate 26,800 $
1-2 Years 36,800 $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 11,000 $
11-20 Years 108,700 $
Yard – Storage Building Total 183,300 $
San Gabriel Water Yard/Plant Total 3,894,800 $
Sierra Madre Avenue Water Yard
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 33,800 $
3-5 Years 7,200 $
6-10 Years 606,200 $
11-20 Years 894,100 $
Site: Total 1,541,300 $
Chemical Building:
Immediate 1,600 $
1-2 Years 2,300 $
3-5 Years 4,700 $
6-10 Years 4,300 $
11-20 Years 15,900 $
Chemical Building: Total 28,800 $
Warehouse
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 124,300 $
3-5 Years 49,500 $
6-10 Years 41,800 $
11-20 Years 154,900 $
Warehouse Total 370,500 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 13 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Water Department Office:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 79,900 $
6-10 Years 232,500 $
11-20 Years 386,400 $
Water Department Office: Total 698,800 $
Sierra Madre Avenue Water Yard Total 2,639,400 $
South Hills Park Restrooms
South Hills Park Restrooms
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 2,000 $
3-5 Years 31,700 $
6-10 Years 156,400 $
11-20 Years 276,300 $
South Hills Park Restrooms Total 466,400 $
South Hills Park Restrooms Total 466,400 $
Transportation Center Building/Garage
Site:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years - $
3-5 Years 1,200 $
6-10 Years 18,900 $
11-20 Years 63,200 $
Site: Total 83,300 $
Garage:
Immediate 1,300 $
1-2 Years 44,000 $
3-5 Years - $
6-10 Years 17,900 $
11-20 Years 56,900 $
Garage: Total 120,100 $
Transportation Center Building:
Immediate - $
1-2 Years 115,700 $
3-5 Years 23,800 $
6-10 Years 60,100 $
11-20 Years 439,800 $
Transportation Center Building: Total 639,400 $
Transportation Center Building/Garage Total 842,800 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 14 of 15
Systems Expenditure Forecast
Grand Total 48,871,500 $
Based on 3% Annual Inflation Page 15 of 15
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Big Dalton Canyon Campground/Restrooms
Restroom Building: Interior and exterior paint, replace toilets, sinks, and hand dryers, and install new LED lighting fixtures. $ 30,853 Site: Replace free standing drinking fountain. $ 3,280
Total Big Dalton Canyon Campground/Restrooms $ 34,133
Big Dalton Canyon Daycamp/Restrooms
Daycamp Building
Replace electric distribution panel, 120/208 V, 200 Amp $ 4,371 Replace commercial water heater, electric ( 12 kW) $ 27,105 Replace metal roof $ 21,994
Prep and paint or seal floors $ 2,538
Subtotal Daycamp Building $ 56,008
Restroom Building
Replace wiring, switches, receptacles, and light fixtures $ 4,625 Prep & paint interior and exterior walls, floors, and ceilings $ 15,488 Replace Toilet Partitions $ 4,371
Replace water supply and drain lines, sinks, toilets, and urinals $ 31,914 Replace metal roof $ 13,071
Replace Retaining Wall $ 45,905
Subtotal Restroom Building $ 115,374
Total Big Dalton Canyon Daycamp/Restrooms $ 171,382
Big Dalton Girl Scout Cabin
Prep and paint exterior walls, replace wood windows, replace aluminum window screens, replace exterior solid core wood door, and replace exterior steel door. $ 25,571
Prep and paint interior walls, replace interior hollow core doors, and replace vinyl floor tiles. $ 14,749
Restroom remodel, including toilet, sink, vanity, exhaust fan, vinyl flooring and related fixtures and equipment. $ 13,409
Replace plumbing system including hot and cold water supply, drains and residential hot water heater. $ 4,382
Kitchen remodel, including new sink, cabinets and countertop. $ 12,101 Minor exterior concrete flatwork $ 1,190
Total Big Dalton Girl Scout Cabin $ 71,402
1 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Big Dalton Canyon Residences
Residence 1
Prep and paint/refinish all interior walls, ceilings, and trim. Prep and paint all painted exterior surfaces. Replace bathtub, toilet and sink in restroom. $ 17,232
Wood floors: Strip and refinish $ 28,855
Replace vinyl floors $ 5,447
Replace toilet and sink in restroom. $ 3,933
Replace electric panel $ 12,022
Replace plastic laminate countertop $ 1,093
Subtotal Residence 1 $ 68,582
Residence 2
Replace solid-core wood exterior door. $ 1,530
Paint walls, ceilings, and trim. $ 7,104
Refinish epoxy coated floors. $ 18,362
Replace vinyl sheeting. $ 1,530
Replace bathtub, toilet, and sink in restroom. $ 9,398
Subtotal Residence 2 $ 37,924
Sitework
Asphalt Pavement: Grind, overlay and stipe $ 37,096
Concrete: Remove and replace $ 11,922
Subtotal Sitework $ 49,018
Total Big Dalton Canyon Residences $ 155,524
Bus Plaza
Replace Area Lighting $ 136,670
Replace Restroom Building Lighting Control $3,760 $ 3,760 Replace Backflow Preventer and Drinking Fountain $ 9,918 Total Bus Plaza $ 150,348
Carlyle E. Linder Equestrian Park
Restroom/Concession Building
Exterior Paint $ 5,902
Kitchen floors: Refinish $ 1,214
Restroom: Replace vinyl flooring $ 3,061
Replace residential water heater $ 1,202
Subtotal Restroom/Concession Building $ 11,379
2 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Sitework
Replace drinking fountain in picnic area $ 3,280
Entrance road: Grind, overlay and restripe $ 33,662
Replace park benches $ 3,936
Repair irrigation system, including controllers and valves $ 39,347 Subtotal Sitework $ 80,225
Total Carlyle E. Linder Equestrian Park $ 91,604
Centennial Heritage Park
Citrus Snack Stand
Restore wood framed window $ 5,028
Interior and exterior paint $ 464
Replace Vinyl Flooring $ 766
Subtotal Citrus Snack Stand $ 6,258
Englehart Shed
Interior and exterior paint $ 3,933
Subtotal Englehart Shed $ 3,933
Hamilton House
Interior and exterior paint $ 15,703
Subtotal Hamilton House $ 15,703
Print Shop Barn
Repair exterior walls $ 2,404
Exterior paint $ 2,623
Refinish interior wood paneling $ 6,558
Subtotal Print Shop Barn $ 11,585
Storage Shed
Replace roof $ 2,076
Paint interior and exterior, including ceiling repair $ 3,619 Replace residential water heater $ 1,202
Subtotal Storage Shed $ 6,897
Sitework
Replace picnic tables and benches $ 3,936
Subtotal Sitework $ 3,936
Total Centennial Heritage Park $ 48,312
3 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Old Chamber of Commerce
Exterior Paint $ 7,379
Residential Water Heater: Replace $ 2,579
Toilets: Replace $ 2,777
HVAC System: Replace $ 16,265
Total Old Chamber of Commerce $ 29,000
City Hall
Replace windows $ 194,789
Replace exterior doors $ 8,015
Roof repair/replacement not noted above $ 477,154
Replace interior doors $ 12,695
Elevator cab finishes - replace $ 17,582
HVAC replacements $ 194,789
Electrical system upgrades $ 683,340
Replace AEDs $ 5,951
Cabinetry and countertops $ 31,737
Parking lots: Grind, overlay, and stripe $ 250,274
Replace park bench $ 1,389
Replace signage $ 11,902
Total City Hall $ 1,889,617
Library / Police Station
Library
Replace Roof $ 852,509
Interior Paint $ 185,312
Carpet and Vinyl Flooring $ 433,250
HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 168,755
Replace Electric Water Heater $ 1,093
Replace AED $ 3,280
Subtotal Library $ 1,644,199
Police Station
Exterior Paint $ 15,215
Roof Repairs/Replacement $ 43,827
Interior Paint $ 79,250
Carpet and Flooring Repair/Replacement $ 19,674
HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 22,515
Replace Generator $ 126,784
Replace Electric Panel $ 98,367
Replace AED $ 3,280
Replace Double Oven $ 18,099
Subtotal Police Station $ 427,011
4 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Sitework
Parking Lot: Grind, Overlay, and Stripe $ 204,858
Replace Retaining Wall $ 26,230
Subtotal Sitework $ 231,088
Total Library / Police Station $ 2,302,298
Corporate Yard
Facility Maintenance Building
Replace Roof $ 66,452
Exterior Paint $ 12,460
Interior Paint $ 9,289
HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 9,618
Replace Electric Panel $ 2,404
Subtotal Facility Maintenance Building $ 100,223
Fleet Shop
Replace Insulated Finishing System and Paint $ 7,389
Replace Roof $ 156,294
Paint Interior (Including repair of concrete walls) $ 52,352 HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 4,809
Replace Electric Panel $ 2,404
Subtotal Fleet Shop $ 223,248
Paint and Sign Shop
Exterior Paint $ 7,870
Roof Repairs/Replacement $ 94,869
Interior Paint $ 18,851
HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 4,809
Replace Electric Panel and secondary transformer $ 37,378 Subtotal Paint and Sign Shop $ 163,777
Streets Office/Locker Room
Exterior Paint $ 9,837
Interior Paint $ 8,143
HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 14,427
Subtotal Streets Office/Locker Room $ 32,407
Sitework
Parking Lot: Grind, Overlay, and Stripe $ 423,631
Subtotal Sitework $ 423,631
Total Corporate Yard $ 943,286
5 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Crowther Teen and Family Center
Gym Roof Replacement $ 263,024
Exterior Paint $ 65,102
Parking lots: Grind, overlay, and stripe $ 245,074
Total Crowther Teen and Family Center $ 573,200
Dawson Park Tennis Complex
Parking lots: Grind, overlay, and stripe $ 109,693
Resurface Courts (Rubber/Acrylic Colored Surface) $ 380,879 Total Dawson Park Tennis Complex $ 490,572
Finkbiner Park Facilities
American Legion Hall
Exterior Paint $ 37,870
Interior Paint and Carpet $ 56,391
HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 8,744
Replace AEDs $ 3,280
Subtotal American Legion Hall $ 106,285
Band Shell
Concrete Walls: Repair $ 2,186
Roof: Replace $ 6,558
Concrete Floor: Repair $ 22,952
Subtotal Band Shell $ 31,696
Liberty House
Exterior Paint $ 3,935
Interior Paint $ 11,475
Replace Countertop $ 3,280
Subtotal Liberty House $ 18,690
Liberty House Restrooms
Interior and Exterior Paint $ 5,050
Subtotal Liberty House Restrooms $ 5,050
Lobb Field Snack Bar
Repair Foundation $ 120,226
Paint and Vinyl Flooring $ 14,984
HVAC: Replace Ductless Split System $ 10,492
Replace Water Heater $ 1,421
Replace Hot and Cold Water Lines $ 9,727
Subtotal Lobb Field Snack Bar $ 156,850
6 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Scout Hut
Interior Paint $ 14,539
HVAC: Replace Condensing Units and Gas Furnaces $ 34,538 Subtotal Scout Hut $ 49,077
Youth Center
Repair Exterior Walls $ 2,524
Replace Roof $ 48,256
Interior Paint and Replace Ceiling Tiles $ 26,449
HVAC Equipment Replacement $ 67,764
Replace Commercial Condensing Style Water Heater $ 27,324 Subtotal Youth Center $ 172,317
Skate/Tennis Park
Replace Electric Panel $ 79,344
Replace Fences and Gates $ 38,085
Subtotal Skate/Tennis Park $ 117,429
Sitework
Asphalt Repairs $ 94,291
Concrete Repairs $ 30,785
Park Amenities: Benches, Picnic Tables, Grills, Etc. $ 14,404 Subtotal Sitework $ 139,480
Total Finkbiner Park Facilities $ 796,874
Gladstone Park
Exterior Paint $ 10,711
Roof Replacement $ 7,032
Interior Paint $ 4,960
Drinking Fountains and Toilets: Replace $ 13,290
Hand Dryers: Replace $ 6,347
Parking lots: Seal and stripe $ 3,928
Play Structure and Other Park Amenities $ 168,357
Total Gladstone Park $ 214,625
Historical Society Museum
Restore Wood Framed Windows $ 25,139
Replace Exterior Doors $ 13,115
Exterior Paint $ 23,083
Upgrade Interior Lighting System $ 41,315
Parking lots: Seal and Stripe $ 6,807
Parking lots: Upgrade Lighting $ 2,623
Total Historical Society Museum $ 112,082
7 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
La Fetra Center
Foundation: Repair $ 798,833
Exterior Paint $ 44,274
Roof: Replace $ 128,735
AED Replacement $ 2,975
Kitchen Equipment Replacements $ 67,442
Parking lots: Seal and stripe $ 14,142
Total La Fetra Center $ 1,056,401
Louie Pompei Memorial Sports Park Facilities
Sitework
Replace Seating Area Roof $ 47,606
Seal and Stripe Parking Areas $ 25,707
Replace Play Structures and Other Park Amenities $ 117,825 Update Signage $ 8,928
Parking Lot and Area Lighting: LED Retrofit $ 698,225
Subtotal Sitework $ 898,291
Maintenance Shed (Including Restroom)
Exterior Paint $ 4,590
Interior Paint $ 4,307
Residential Water Heater: Replace $ 1,967
Drinking Fountain: Replace $ 3,280
Hand Dryers: Replace $ 6,994
HVAC Split System: Replace $ 10,492
Subtotal Maintenance Shed (Including Restroom) $ 31,630 Snack Bar (Including Restroom)
Rolling Security Shutter: Replace $ 5,246
Exterior Door: Replace $ 4,154
Drinking Fountain: Replace $ 3,280
Interior Paint: Walls, Ceilings, and Floors $ 14,972
Toilet Partitions: Replace $ 13,006
Residential Water Heater: Replace $ 1,967
Hand Dryers $ 13,989
Kitchen Equipment: Replace $ 53,298
Subtotal Snack Bar (Including Restroom) $ 109,912
Total Louie Pompei Memorial Sports Park Facilities $ 1,039,833 8 of 42 6/3/2026
FCA Recommended Maintenance
2026-2030
Description Amount
Parks Yard
Interior Paint and Carpet: Admin Building $ 20,275
Interior Lighting Upgrades: Storage Building $ 3,213
HVAC replacements $ 29,727
Replace AEDs $ 3,280
Total Parks Yard $ 56,495
Recreation and Human Services (Formerly Transportation Center) Admin Building Roof: Replace $ 48,605
Garage Roof: Replace $ 145,187
Garage Interior Paint $ 13,624
Garage Floor: Repair $ 1,967
Admin Building HVAC Equipment: Replace $ 31,040
Garage Electrical Panel: Replace $ 2,404
Parking lots: Seal and Stripe Asphalt $ 1,574
Subtotal Recreation and Human Services (Formerly Transportation Center) $ 244,401 South Hills Park
Restroom: Exterior Paint $ 2,380
Restroom Metal Gates: Replace $ 7,538
Restroom Interior Paint $ 2,377
Dog Park Drinking Fountains: Replace $ 2,975
Restroom Drinking Fountain: Replace $ 2,975
Restroom Hand Dryers: Replace $ 6,347
Parking lots: Seal and Stripe Asphalt, Replenish Gravel $ 6,544 Park Amenities: Grills, Trash Receptacles, Signage, Etc. $ 15,155 Total South Hills Park $ 46,291
Grand Total $ 10,517,680
9 of 42 6/3/2026
BIG DALTON CANYON CAMPGROUND/RESTROOMS
The Big Dalton Canyon Park Campground
was originally developed in 1970. Since the
site was constructed, there have been no
significant renovations. The existing facilities
at the campground include a wooden-framed
gazebo, a small camping area, and a
restroom building. The site area is furnished
with picnic tables, precast spectator seating,
camping grills, and a drinking fountain.
Access is provided by a pedestrian bridge
located by Big Dalton Canyon Road.
Recently Completed Work ($2,000)
• Replaced water supply and drain lines to the sinks in restroom building.
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Restroom Building: Interior and exterior paint, replace toilets, sinks, and hand dryers, and install new LED lighting fixtures to increase energy efficiency and reduce maintenance costs.
$30,853
Site: Replace free standing drinking fountain. $3,280
Total: $34,133
10 of 42 6/3/2026
BIG DALTON CANYON PARK DAYCAMP/RESTROOMS
The site includes two buildings, the Day
Camp Cabin and the Restroom Building.
Additionally, there is a picnic area equipped
with picnic tables and recycling bins for trash
disposal. Many of the MEPF (Mechanical,
Electrical, Plumbing, and Fire Protection)
components were original to the structures at
the time of the facilities assessment. The
buildings are not heated or cooled. Domestic
hot water is supplied by an electric water
heater.
Recently Completed Work (11,200)
Daycamp Building
• Painting, exterior and interior
• Replaced suspended ceiling tiles
• Replaced cabinets, countertops and sink
• Replaced water supply and drain lines
• Replaced electrical wiring and switches
• Upgraded lighting to LED panels
Restroom Building
• Installed shut-off valve in pipe chase
• Replaced water supply and drain lines to restroom sinks Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Daycamp Building
Description Estimated Cost
Replace electric distribution panel, 120/208 V, 200 Amp $4,371 Replace commercial water heater, electric (12 kW) $27,105 Replace metal roof $21,994
Prep and paint or seal floors $2,538
Total: $56,008
11 of 42 6/3/2026
Restroom Building
Description Estimated Cost
Replace wiring, switches, receptacles, and light fixtures $4,625 Prep & paint interior and exterior walls, floors, and ceilings $15,488 Replace Toilet Partitions $4,371
Replace water supply and drain lines, sinks, toilets, and urinals $31,914 Replace metal roof $13,071
Replace Retaining Wall $45,905
Total: $115,374
Grand Total: $171,382
12 of 42 6/3/2026
BIG DALTON GIRL SCOUT CABIN
The Girl Scout Cabin was constructed in
1970. The building is located across the street
from the park’s day camp area. The hutshaped structure is constructed with a concrete masonry framework featuring
wooden siding and decks, all topped with
metal roof finishes. The facade features
original steel doors, wooden doors, and
wooden-framed windows, all covered with
aluminum shutters. The interior floors are
covered with vinyl sheeting and VCT tiles that show significant wear and require replacement in the near future.
Recently Completed Work
• Routine maintenance
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Girl Scout Cabin
Description Estimated Cost
Prep and paint exterior walls, replace wood windows, replace aluminum window screens, replace exterior solid core wood door, and replace exterior steel door.
$25,571
Prep and paint interior walls, replace interior hollow core doors, and replace vinyl floor tiles.
$14,749
Restroom remodel, including toilet, sink, vanity, exhaust fan, vinyl flooring and related fixtures and equipment.
$13,409
Replace plumbing system including hot and cold water supply, drains and residential hot water heater.
$4,382
Kitchen remodel, including new sink, cabinets and countertop. $12,101 Minor exterior concrete flatwork $1,190
Total: $71,402
13 of 42 6/3/2026
BIG DALTON CANYON RESIDENCES
The property was built in 1934-1936 and is
also called “Rock House”. The existing main
residence (Residence 1) consists of one
bedroom and one bathroom. Additionally,
there is a master retreat suite (Residence 2)
that features its own private entrance and has
a bedroom with an attached bathroom. The
facility was previously used as a residence
but has remained closed and unoccupied for
several years.
Recently Completed Work
Residence 1
• Minimal Maintenance
Residence 2
• Minimal Maintenance
Site
• Minimal Maintenance
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
The nature of improvements will depend upon the intended use of the structure. Items listed below represent necessary work to maintain the existing configuration and functionality only.
Residence 1
Description Estimated Cost
Prep and paint/refinish all interior walls, ceilings, and trim. Prep and paint all painted exterior surfaces. Replace bathtub, toilet and sink in restroom.
$17,232
Wood floors: Strip and refinish $28,855
Replace vinyl floors $5,447
Replace toilet and sink in restroom. $3,933
Replace electric panel $12,022
Replace plastic laminate countertop $1,093
Total: $68,582
14 of 42 6/3/2026
Residence 2
Description Estimated Cost
Replace solid-core wood exterior door. $1,530
Paint walls, ceilings, and trim. $7,104
Refinish epoxy coated floors. $18,362
Replace vinyl sheeting. $1,530
Replace bathtub, toilet, and sink in restroom. $9,398
Total: $37,924
Site
Description Estimated Cost
Asphalt Pavement: Grind, overlay and stipe $37,096
Concrete: Remove and replace $11,922
Total: $49,018
Grand Total: $155,524
15 of 42 6/3/2026
BUS PLAZA
The Bus Plaza in the city of Glendora was
initially developed in 1994 and underwent
renovation in 2005. Public restrooms were
added, and all ADA requirements were met.
Recently Completed Work ($7,800)
• LED Lighting Retrofit
• Paint
• Restroom Upgrades: Interior Paint, Sinks, Hand Dryers, and Other Fixtures Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Electrical: Replace Area Lighting $136,670
• Electrical: Replace Restroom Building Lighting Control $3,760 • Plumbing: Replace Backflow Preventer and Drinking Fountain $9,918 Total: $150,348
16 of 42 6/3/2026
CARLYLE E. LINDER EQUESTRIAN PARK
Carlyle E. Linder Equestrian Park covers 5.7
acres and provides a location for walks and
horse riding. The amenities include a picnic
area, unpaved parking, and a building
housing restroom and a snack bar. No
notable issues were identified regarding the
façade and structural components within the
building. All architectural elements of
restrooms were renovated in 2018. The
overall condition of the interior finishes is
considered fair to good, and the interior
construction is evidently well-maintained. Recommendations are limited to routine lifecycle replacements.
Recently Completed Work ($9,900)
Restroom/Concession Building
• Restroom interior painting completed
• Plumbing system replaced
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Restroom/Concession Building
Description Estimated Cost
Exterior Paint $5,902
Kitchen Floors: Refinish $1,214
Restroom: Replace Vinyl Flooring $3,061
Replace Residential Water Heater $1,202
Total: $11,379
Site
Description Estimated Cost
Replace Drinking Fountain in Picnic Area $3,280
Entrance road: Grind, Overlay and Restripe $33,662
Replace Park Benches $3,936
Repair Irrigation System, Including Controllers and Valves $39,347 Total: $80,225
Grand Total: $91,604
17 of 42 6/3/2026
CENTENNIAL HERITAGE PARK
The Centennial Heritage Park Facilities were
originally constructed in 1895. The property is
a historical preservation site that provides
tours seasonally.
The buildings have wood framed structures
with asphalt shingle roofs and exterior wood
siding walls. The Storage Shed building’s roof
was damaged by a falling tree. The other
building’s roofs are in fair condition.
Recently Completed Work ($1,300)
Englehart Shed
• Removed fallen tree
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Citrus Snack Stand
• Restore wood framed window $5,028
• Interior and exterior paint $464
• Replace Vinyl Flooring $766
Englehart Shed
• Interior and exterior paint $3,933
Hamilton House
• Interior and exterior paint $15,703
Print Shop Barn
• Repair exterior walls $2,404
• Exterior paint $2,623
• Refinish interior wood paneling $6,558
Storage Shed
• Replace roof $2,076
• Paint interior and exterior, including ceiling repair $3,619 • Replace residential water heater $1,202
Site
• Replace picnic tables and benches $3,936
Total: $48,312
18 of 42 6/3/2026
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
The Chamber of Commerce building was
constructed in 1940.
Recently Completed Work ($17,480)
• LED Lighting Retrofit
• New roofing
• Interior Paint
• New Carpeting
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $7,379
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Residential Water Heater: Replace $2,579
• Toilets: Replace $2,777
• HVAC System: Replace $16,265
Total: $29,000
19 of 42 6/3/2026
CITY HALL
City Hall was built in 1921. Originally, the
building contained a library, jail, and
administrative offices. The council chambers
were added to the east side of the building in
1990. No major renovations have been made
since the date of the last addition.
The building has a non-central HVAC system
that consists of three rooftop packaged units,
split systems, and gas furnaces to heat and
cool the interior spaces throughout the
facility. Most of the condensing units utilize R-22 refrigerant that has been phased out due to its detrimental impact on the environment. In addition, the majority of the HVAC units have exceeded their expected useful life.
Recently Completed Work ($771,590)
• Bottle fill station installation
• Council Chamber roof repair
• Council Chamber paint and carpet
• Council restroom upgrades
• City Clerk renovation/relocation
• Engineering reconfiguration
• HVAC
o Replaced upper floor gas furnace
o Replaced upper floor split system
o Replaced basement split system
• Paint and Carpet: Main lobby, stairwells, and upper floor landing • Repair of roof over ground floor restroom
• Security system upgrades
• Sewer relining
• Water heater replacement (Council side)
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Replace windows $194,789
• Replace exterior doors $8,015
• Roof repair/replacement not noted above $477,154
20 of 42 6/3/2026
Description Estimated Cost
Building Interior
• Replace interior doors $12,695
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Elevator cab finishes - replace $17,582
• HVAC replacements $194,789
• Electrical system upgrades $683,340
Furnishings and Equipment
• Replace AEDs $5,951
• Cabinetry and countertops $31,737
Sitework
• Parking lots: Grind, overlay, and stripe $250,274
• Replace park bench $1,389
• Replace signage $11,902
Total: $1,889,617
21 of 42 6/3/2026
LIBRARY / POLICE STATION
The Police/Library property was originally
constructed in 1965. The Traffic Office was
installed at the Police Station in the 1980’s. In
the 1990’s, the IT Office/Storage Unit was
built at the Police Station.
Recently Completed Work ($430,833)
Library
• Bottle Fill Stations
• HVAC
o Air Handler Repairs
o Boot Replacement (Flexible Duct Coupling)
o Boiler Replacement
• LED Lighting Retrofit
• Water Heater Replacement
• Security system upgrades
Police Station
• Bottle Fill Stations
• LED Lighting Retrofit
• Front Lobby Renovations (In-Progress)
• Gate Opener Replacement
• Remodel Projects
o Admin Office
o Detective Bureau
o Records
• Security system upgrades
• Water Heater Replacement (4)
22 of 42 6/3/2026
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Library
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Replace Roof $852,509
Building Interior
• Paint $185,312
• Carpet and Vinyl Flooring $433,250
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $168,755
• Replace Electric Water Heater $1,093
Furnishings and Equipment
• Replace AED $3,280
Total: $1,644,199
Police Station (Including IT Office, Storage Unit, and Traffic Office) Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $15,215
• Roof Repairs/Replacement $43,827
Building Interior
• Paint $79,250
• Carpet and Flooring Repair/Replacement $19,674
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $22,515
• Replace Generator $126,784
• Replace Electric Panel $98,367
Furnishings and Equipment
• Replace AED $3,280
• Replace Double Oven $18,099
Total: $427,011
Site
Description Estimated Cost
Parking Lot: Grind, Overlay, and Stripe $204,858
Replace Retaining Wall $26,230
Total: $231,088
Grand Total: $2,302,298
23 of 42 6/3/2026
CORPORATE YARD
The Corporate Yard property was originally constructed in 1965 and consists of the facility maintenance building, paint and sign shop, fleet services building, streets office/locker room, and a fuel island.
Facility Maintenance Building Paint and Sign Shop
Fleet Services Building Streets Office / Locker Room
Fuel Island
24 of 42 6/3/2026
The Corporate Yard property was originally constructed in 1965. It consists of maintenance shops, offices, and a fuel island.
Recently Completed Work ($968,321)
Facility Maintenance Building
• LED Lighting Retrofit
Fleet Shop
• LED Lighting Retrofit
• Water Heater Replaced
Paint and Sign Shop
• LED Lighting Retrofit
Streets Office/Locker Room
• LED Lighting Retrofit
Site
• City Yard Improvement Project (Design Only)
• Bus Charging Station Installed
• Replaced Gate Opener
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Facility Maintenance Building
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Replace Roof $66,452
• Paint $12,460
Building Interior
• Paint $9,289
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $9,618
• Replace Electric Panel $2,404
Total: $100,223
25 of 42 6/3/2026
Fleet Shop
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Replace Insulated Finishing System and Paint $7,389
• Replace Roof $156,294
Building Interior
• Paint (Including repair of concrete walls) $52,352
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $4,809
• Replace Electric Panel $2,404
Total: $223,248
Paint and Sign Shop
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $7,870
• Roof Repairs/Replacement $94,869
Building Interior
• Paint $18,851
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $4,809
• Replace Electric Panel and secondary transformer $37,378 Total: $163,777
Streets Office/Locker Room
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $9,837
Building Interior
• Paint $8,143
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $14,427
Total: $32,407
Site
Description Estimated Cost
Parking Lot: Grind, Overlay, and Stripe $423,631
Total: $423,631
Grand Total: $943,286
26 of 42 6/3/2026
CROWTHER TEEN AND FAMILY CENTER
The Crowther Teen and Family Center was
originally constructed in 2003. The facility
includes an computer lab and learning
center, meeting rooms, basketball gym, and
restrooms.
Recently Completed Work ($119,630)
• Bathroom Fixtures and Partitions
• Battery Backup Lighting
• Bottle Fill Station
• Ceiling Tile Replacement
• Interior Paint and Carpet
• LED Lighting Retrofit
• Restroom Remodel
• Security System Upgrades
• Water Heater Replacement
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Gym Roof Replacement $263,024
• Paint $65,102
Sitework
• Parking lots: Grind, overlay, and stripe $245,074
Total: $573,200
27 of 42 6/3/2026
DAWSON PARK TENNIS COMPLEX
The Dawson Avenue Park Tennis Complex
was originally constructed in 1967. It was
renovated during the construction of the
Crowther Teen and Family Center in 2003.
The tennis complex includes the tennis
courts and nets, metal benches, trash
receptacles, surrounding fencing, and pole
lights.
Recently Completed Work ($2,000)
• Replaced Netting
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Sitework
• Parking lots: Grind, overlay, and stripe $109,693
• Resurface Courts (Rubber/Acrylic Colored Surface) $380,879 Total: $490,572
28 of 42 6/3/2026
FINKBINER PARK FACILITIES
Finkbiner Park and its facilities were originally constructed in 1930. The facilities include the American Legion Hall, Band Shell, Checkout Restrooms, Liberty House, Liberty House Restrooms, Lobb Field Snack Bar, Scout Hut, Youth Center, Skate Park, and Tennis Courts.
American Legion Hall Band Shell
Checkout Restrooms Liberty House
Liberty House Restrooms
Lobb Field Snack Bar
29 of 42 6/3/2026
Scout Hut Youth Center
Skate Park Tennis Courts
Recently Completed Work ($277,435)
American Legion Hall
• Basement Paint, Lighting and Plumbing Fixtures
• Bottle Fill Station
• HVAC: Replaced Package Unit and Added Mini Split System • LED Lighting Retrofit
• Office Renovations: Paint, Carpet and Asbestos Remediation • Restroom Remodel
• Water Heater replacement
Band Shell
• None
Checkout Restrooms
• None
30 of 42 6/3/2026
Liberty House
• None
Liberty House Restrooms
• None
Lobb Field Snack Bar
• None
Scout Hut
• New Water Service Line
• Replaced Plumbing Fixtures
Youth Center
• Bottle Fill Station
• Exterior Door Replacement
• LED Lighting Retrofit
Skate/Tennis Park
• Skate Park Rehabilitation
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
American Legion Hall
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $37,870
Building Interior
• Paint and Carpet $56,391
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $8,744
Furnishings and Equipment
• Replace AEDs $3,280
Total: $106,285
Band Shell
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Concrete Walls: Repair $2,186
31 of 42 6/3/2026
Band Shell
Description Estimated Cost
• Roof: Replace $6,558
Building Interior
• Concrete Floor: Repair $22,952
Total: $31,696
Checkout Restrooms
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• None $0
Building Interior
• None $0
Total: $0
Liberty House
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $3,935
Building Interior
• Paint $11,475
• Replace Countertop $3,280
Total: $18,690
Liberty House Restrooms
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $1,784
Building Interior
• Paint $3,266
Total: $5,050
Lobb Field Snack Bar
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Repair Foundation $120,226
Building Interior
• Paint and Vinyl Flooring $14,984
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC: Replace Ductless Split System $10,492
32 of 42 6/3/2026
Lobb Field Snack Bar
Description Estimated Cost
• Replace Water Heater $1,421
• Replace Hot and Cold Water Lines $9,727
Total: $156,850
Scout Hut
Description Estimated Cost
Building Interior
• Paint $14,539
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC: Replace Condensing Units and Gas Furnaces $34,538 Total: $49,077
Youth Center
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Repair Exterior Walls $2,524
• Replace Roof $48,256
Building Interior
• Paint and Replace Ceiling Tiles $26,449
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC Equipment Replacement $67,764
• Replace Commercial Condensing Style Water Heater $27,324 Total: $172,317
Skate/Tennis Park
Description Estimated Cost
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Replace Electric Panel $79,344
Miscellaneous
• Replace Fences and Gates $38,085
Total: $117,429
Sitework
Description Estimated Cost
• Asphalt Repairs $94,291
• Concrete Repairs $30,785
• Park Amenities: Benches, Picnic Tables, Grills, etc. $14,404 Total: $139,480
33 of 42 6/3/2026
Grand Total: $796,874
34 of 42 6/3/2026
GLADSTONE PARK
The Gladstone Park Restroom building was
originally built in 1965. It is located to the
south of Gladstone Park.
The small restroom building has a slab on
grade foundation. The pitched roof has layers
of asphalt shingles that are free of any visible
damage. The exterior façade is finished with
glazed masonry units that show no cracking
and spalling issues due to water infiltration.
The restroom floors and interior walls are
finished with ceramic tiles.
Recently Completed Work ($27,425)
• LED Lighting Retrofit
• Restored “Lion” Drinking Fountain
• Installed Electric Pedestal
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $10,711
• Roof: Replace $7,032
Building Interior
• Paint $4,960
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Drinking Fountains and Toilets: Replace $13,290
• Hand Dryers: Replace $6,347
Sitework
• Parking lots: Seal and stripe $3,928
• Play Structure and Other Park Amenities $168,357
Total: $214,625
35 of 42 6/3/2026
HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM
The small building was originally built in 1913
and contained Glendora's original City Hall,
Volunteer Fire Department, and a holding
cell. In 1952, the building was substantially
renovated and converted into a museum.
Several renovations have been completed
throughout its history, but its use has not
changed.
Recently Completed Work ($20,000)
• New roofing
• Interior Paint
• New Carpeting and Terrazzo Floors.
• New Rooftop A/C
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Restore Wood Framed Windows $25,139
• Replace Exterior Doors $13,115
• Paint $23,083
Building Interior
• Upgrade Interior Lighting System $41,315
Sitework
• Parking lots: Seal and Stripe $6,807
• Parking lots: Upgrade Lighting $2,623
Total: $112,082
36 of 42 6/3/2026
LA FETRA CENTER
The La Fetra Senior Center was originally
constructed in 1933. The northern section of
the building was added in 1996. The facility is
used as a senior citizen center and
administrative office.
Recently Completed Work ($208,175)
• Historic Building
o Bottle Fill Station
o New Upstairs Ductwork
o Paint and Carpet
o Replaced Skylight
o Water Heater Replacement
o Stair Replacement (Construction Contract Awarded)
• Expansion Building
o LED Lighting Retrofit
o Paint and Carpet
o Restroom Fixtures Replaced
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Foundation: Repair $798,833
• Paint $44,274
• Roof: Replace $128,735
Furnishings and Equipment
• AED Replacement $2,975
• Kitchen Equipment Replacements $67,442
Sitework
• Parking lots: Seal and stripe $14,142
Total: $1,056,401
37 of 42 6/3/2026
LOUIE POMPEI MEMORIAL SPORTS PARK FACILITIES
Louie Pompei Memorial Sports Park
Facilities was developed in 2007. It is a large
sports complex that covers an estimated
land area of twenty acres. The existing
amenities at the park include four baseball
fields, a soccer field, children’s play area,
pump house, a snack bar, restroom
buildings, and a maintenance shed.
Recently Completed Work ($174,314)
• Security System Upgrades
• LED Lighting Retrofit: Snack Bar and Maintenance Shed • New Scoreboards
• Replaced Baseball Fields Backstops
• Installed Artificial Turf on Ball Fields
• Refinished Stair Rails
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Site
Description Estimated Cost
• Replace Seating Area Roof $47,606
• Seal and Stripe Parking Areas $25,707
• Replace Play Structures and Other Park Amenities $117,825 • Update Signage $8,928
• Parking Lot and Area Lighting: LED Retrofit $698,225
Total: $898,291
38 of 42 6/3/2026
Maintenance Shed (Including Restroom)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $4,590
Building Interior
• Paint $4,307
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Residential Water Heater: Replace $1,967
• Drinking Fountain: Replace $3,280
• Hand Dryers: Replace $6,994
• HVAC Split System: Replace $10,492
Total: $31,630
Snack Bar (Including Restroom)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Rolling Security Shutter: Replace $5,246
• Exterior Door: Replace $4,154
• Drinking Fountain: Replace $3,280
Building Interior
• Paint: Walls, Ceilings, and Floors $14,972
• Toilet Partitions: Replace $13,006
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Residential Water Heater: Replace $1,967
• Hand Dryers $13,989
Furnishings and Equipment
• Kitchen Equipment: Replace $53,298
Total: $109,912
Grand Total: $1,039,833
39 of 42 6/3/2026
PARKS YARD
The Parks Yard was originally built in 1950.
The storage garage was later constructed in
2009. The property is used as an
administration building for the Parks Division
of the Public Works Department and as an
area to store maintenance equipment.
Recently Completed Work ($154,473)
• Parking Lot Rehabilitation
• New Water Service Line
• Remediation of Water Damage
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Interior
• Paint and Carpet: Admin Building $20,275
• Interior Lighting Upgrades: Storage Building $3,213
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• HVAC replacements $29,727
Furnishings and Equipment
• Replace AEDs $3,280
Total: $56,495
40 of 42 6/3/2026
RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES (FORMERLY TRANSPORTATION CENTER) The Transportation Center Building and
Garage were constructed in 1995.
Recently Completed Work ($95,000)
• Exterior Paint on Admin Building and Garage
• Garage Building Ceiling Repaired
• Interior Carpet and Paint
• LED Lighting Upgrades
• Restroom Fixtures Replaced
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Admin Building Roof: Replace $48,605
• Garage Roof: Replace $145,187
Building Interior
• Garage Paint $13,624
• Garage Floor: Repair $1,967
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Admin Building HVAC Equipment: Replace $31,040
• Garage Electrical Panel: Replace $2,404
Sitework
• Parking lots: Seal and Stripe Asphalt $1,574
Total: $244,401
41 of 42 6/3/2026
SOUTH HILLS PARK
The South Hills Park Restrooms building was
originally built in 1973. It is located to the
eastern end of the park. An asphalt parking
lot and concrete paved sidewalks constitute
the flatwork of the site. A small play area
containing play components and park
benches is present next to the restroom
building. Two small dog parks are also
located at the western boundary of the park.
Recently Completed Work
• None
Recommended Improvements (2026-2030)
Description Estimated Cost
Building Exterior
• Paint $2,380
• Metal Gates: Replace $7,538
Building Interior
• Paint $2,377
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Systems
• Dog Park Drinking Fountains: Replace $2,975
• Restroom Drinking Fountain: Replace $2,975
• Hand Dryers: Replace $6,347
Sitework
• Parking lots: Seal and Stripe Asphalt, Replenish Gravel $6,544 • Park Amenities: Grills, Trash Receptacles, Signage, etc. $15,155 Total: $46,291
42 of 42 6/3/2026
Facilities and Parks Projects
FY 2023/24 through FY 2025/26
Facilities Projects
Big Dalton
Completed Projects
Description Amount
Day Camp
LED Lighting Retrofit (Materials Only) $1,200
Interior and Exterior Paint $2,000
Ceiling Tile replacement $1,000
Sink Counter Replacement $1,500
New custom cabinets and wash sink $1,500
Broken bench seat replaced $800
Restroom lock repaired (welded bolts to the lock plate) $200 New press-fitted shut-off valve installed at restroom chase way $1,000 Sink supply and drain lines plumbed in for restrooms $2,000 Total $11,200
Bus Plaza
Completed Projects
Description Amount
Paint $1,000
LED Lighting Retrofit $800
Door Lock Replacement $3,500
Plumbing Upgrades: Sink, Hand Driers, and other fixtures $2,500 Total $7,800
Chamber Building
Completed Projects
Description Amount
LED Lighting Replacement, ceiling tile replacement (Materials Only) $4,000 Replaced Carpet $6,630
Painted Interior $6,850
Total $17,480