Agenda packet — Glendora City Council, September 22, 2026 (part 2 of 3)

9.5'
10'
14'
5 12'
6'
13' 39 126 LF R1-1 15 15 R1-1 15 G66-21 (CA), G33-1(CA) 17 R81(CA), R81b(CA) R81(CA), R81a(CA) 17 17 TYPE PR (CA) PROPOSED SIGNAL CABINET SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY R1-1 36"x36" R1-5 30"x30" R2-1 24"x30" R3-7R 30"x30" R14-1 24"x18" R81 (CA) 12"x18" R81A (CA) 12"x5" R81B (CA) 12"x5" TYPE PR (CA) 6"x18" W4-2 30"x30" G66-21 (CA) 24"x6" G66-21a (CA) 24"x6" 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.065 Glendora, CA SGVCOG SMIP\CAD\01_Plans\_Glendora Avenue Segment\2024-065_T-SPM_GLN.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:45:10 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40

R / W R / W
5 R / W R / W

R / W CITRUS AVE CITRUS AVE
5 85' 39A 17 LF 15 LF
8 28 19 LF
80'
14'
12'
12'
14'
12' 1 EXISTING BUS STOP CITY OF AZUSA CITY OF GLENDORA 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
14+00 23 LF 28
11'
11' W1-1aR [20 MPH], R26(S) 15 W1-8 15 W1-8 15W1-10aL 15 15 W1-8 R3-7 15 W3-3 15

CURVE CURVE DWY DWY DWY

CURVE R / W R / W R / W R / W

R / W FOOTHILL BLVD
AMBER
OAKS LN 272 LF 28
7 7
7 39A 66 LF 39 63 LF11 13 39 68 LF 67 LF 39 11
9 TYPE VI
9 TYPE VI 13 31 678 LF
8 182 LF
80'
14'
12' 14' 12' 12'
7'
7'
12' 12' 7' 26'
85'
17 LF 39A
8 14'
12' 12'
14'
12' 19
1 2
2 7' 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00
23 LF 28 15 R28 (CA) 15 R2-1 (35), MONUMENT (TREES) 15 R32(CA), MONUMENT (WELCOME) R28 (CA) 15 15 R1-1 18 W4-2 17 R4-1 15 W1-1aR [20MPH]l, R28(S) (CA) 15 METRO PARKING 17 R81(CA), R81b(CA) 15 R28(S) 15 W3-3 POLE 15 W1-1, W16-2P [20MPH] SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:45:39 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24. TYPE PER PLAN INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XX INSTALL CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24F. INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24D. INSTALL SHARED ROADWAY BICYCLE SYMBOL PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24C. SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY R1-1 36"x36" R1-5 30"x30" R2-1 24"x30" R3-7R 30"x30" R4-1 18"x24" R26(S) (CA) 12"x18" STOPPING ANY TIME R28(S) (CA) 12"x18" R32 (CA) 12"x18" R81 (CA) 12"x18" R81B (CA) 12"x5" W1-1 30"x30" W1-8 30"x30" W3-3 30"x30" W4-2 30"x30" W1-10aL 30"x30" W16-2P 24"x12" XXX

DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD
AUTUMN

OAKS LN
7 39 94 LF 39 20 LF 39 20 LF 39 20 LF 13 11 31 1000 LF 11 11 11 9 TYPE VI 39 258 LF
80'
26' 12' 12'
7'
12'
7'
80'
7' 12' 12' 12' 6.9'
7'
14' 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 15 R28 (CA) 15 R28 (CA) 15 R1-1 R28 (CA) 15 39 38 LF 17 TYPE P(R) (CA) 15 R28(S) STREET NAME SIGNS 15 R28 (S) 15 15 DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD 32 LF 39 39 40 LF 13 31 333 LF 38A 100 LF 11 11 21 235 LF 38 41 LF TYPE IV (L) 9 39A 61 LF
80'
7' 12' 12' 12' 7'
12' 15'
7'
12' 12'
12'
5'
12'
7' 7'
90'
7'

10.5' EXISTING BUS BAY 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00
9 TYPE IV (L) 15 R28(S) (CA) TYPE IV (L)
9 15 R28(S) (CA) 15 R1-1 15 BUS FLAG R28 (S) 15 15 R28 (S) SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:45:59 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24. TYPE PER PLAN INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XXSIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY R1-1 36"x36" R28 (CA) 12"x18" R28(S) (CA) 12"x18"

DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

GALANTO
AVE 21 58 LF 38A 58 LF 377 LF 28 28 21 110 LF TYPE IV (L) 9 9 TYPE IV (L) 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 53 LF 39 40 LF 39 10 LF 39 39 84 LF 39A 76 LF 7 7'
12'
5'
90'
12'
7'
12' 12' 7'
7'
7'
12'
5'
12'
80'
12' 12' 38A 110 LF 39A 76 LF
7' 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00
10+00 10+90 39 42 LF 39 43 LF
9 TYPE IV (L) R28(S) (CA) 15 R28(S) (CA) DBL 15 15 R28(S) (CA) DBL 15 15 R1-1, R3-5R STREET NAME SIGNS 15 15 R28(S)R81(CA) 18 R1-1 15 15 R28(S)R 15 15 R28(S) R28(S) 15 17 TYPE PR (CA) 17 TYPE PR (CA) 15 R1-1 DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

AMBLESIDE

WAY TYPE IV (L)
9 11 11 11 13 13 13 39 20 LF 39 162 LF 39 91 LF 245 LF 28 31 520 LF 21 68 LF 28 99 LF 7 7
80'
12' 12' 12'
5'
7'
7'
5'
80'
12' 12'
19'
12' 68 LF 38A 13
14'
9'
14'

9.4' 34+00 35+00 36+00
10+00 37+00 38+00
10+90 39 43 LF 39 42 LF R1-1 R14-1 15 15 R81 (CA) 15 POLE R1-1, STREET NAME SIGN 15 15 R28(S) SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:46:21 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24. TYPE PER PLAN INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XXSIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES R1-1 36"x36" R3-5 30"x36" SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY R14-1 24"x18" R28(S) (CA) 12"x18" R81 (CA) 12"x18" TYPE PR (CA) 6"x18"

DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W

R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

BARRANCA AVE TYPE IV (L)
9 TYPE IV (L)
9 11 11 11 13 13 13 39 53 LF 221 LF 39 192 LF 39 39 208 LF 21 82 LF 400 LF 21 YELLOW 5 5 YELLOW 38A 196 LF
7 7
7 80'
12'
12' 12' 12'
5'
5'
7'
3' 79 LF 38A
12' 12'
14' 13
1 1
1 1
9 TYPE IV (L) EXISTING BUS STOP EXISTING BUS STOP 13
3'
5'
8'
8' 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 11+30
11+00 11+30
12+00
11' 13'
11' 11' 13

6.5'

6.5' 15 R28 (CA) DBL 17 TYPE PR (CA) 15 R28(S) DBL 18 R81 (CA) 17 R81 (CA) W4-2 16 15 R28(S) 15 R28(S) DWY DWY DWY DWY

R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

CALIFORNIA

MARCILE
AVE

AVE TYPE IV (L)
9 TYPE IV (L)
9 11 13 13 13 216 LF 39 39 568 LF 96 LF 39 18 LF 39 10 LF 39 39 323 LF 39 72 LF 28 134 LF 119 LF 28 353 LF 31 60 LF 21 31 148 LF 60 LF 38A 7 127'
12'
5' 5'
3'
6'
127'
10' 11' 11'
5'
6'
10' 11' 11'
5'
12'
12'
11'
8' 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00
10+00 10+60
10+00 10+80 11 R / W
5' 17 R2-1 [40 MPH] 15 R1-1, PERMIT PRKG 15 STREET LABELS 18 R81 (CA) 15 W1-8, N-1 (CA) R28 (CA) RT ARROW 15 15 R1-1, PERMIT PRKNG 15 STREET LABELS 18 R81 (CA) 15 R14-1, M6-315 R28(S) OM1-3 15 R28(S) 15R28(S) 15 15 R28(S) 15 R28(S) SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:46:45 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24. TYPE PER PLAN INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XX INSTALL CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24F. INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES M6-3 21"x15" SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY N-1(CA) 18"x18" R1-1 36"x36" R2-1 24"x30" R14-1 24"x18" R28 (CA) 12"x18" R28(S) (CA) 12"x18" R81 (CA) 12"x18" TYPE PR (CA) 6"x18" W1-8 30"x30" W4-2 30"x30"

DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY R / W R / W R / WR / W FOOTHILL BLVD

WILDWOOD
AVE

WILDWOOD
AVE 11 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 39 54 LF 39 202 LF 21 LF 39 39 63 LF 39 129 LF 39 26 LF 39 44 LF 39 50 LF 23 LF 39 39 5 LF 31 497 LF 31 423 LF 127'
6'
11' 10' 11'
85' 5.6'
11' 10'
12'
7'
6'
2 1
7'
7'
5'
6'
6'
5' 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00
10+60 11+00 11+60
10+00 10+60 15 R28 (CA) DBL 15 R28 (CA) DBL 15 R1-1 15 STREET LABELS 18 R81 (CA) R28 (CA) DBL 15 15 R28(S) OM1-3 15 R28(S)L 15 R81(CA) 18 W14-2, PERMIT SIGN 15 R1-1 15 R28(S)R 15 R1-1, STREET NAME SIGNS 15 DWY DWY DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

VALENCIA
ST 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 39 109 LF 94 LF 39 39 187 LF 274 LF 31 7 7
7 85'
11' 10' 12'

5.7'
80'
12'
7'
3'
10'
7'
12'
12'
12' 12' 31 519 LF
1 2 EXISTING BUS STOP EXISTING BUS STOP
12' 12' 1313
3'
7'
10'
7' 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00
10+00 11+00 11+60
3' 16 LF 39 15 15 R1-1, STREET LABELS 17 R81 (CA) 17 R100B, R112 (CA) 17 D11-1, G33-1 (CA) UP ARROW R1-1 15 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:47:04 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XX INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24D. SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES D11-1 24"x18" SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY G33-1 (CA) 24"x6" N-1(CA) 18"x18" R1-1 36"x36" R28 (CA) 12"x18" R28(S) (CA) 12"x18" R81 (CA) 12"x18" R100B 12"x5" R112(CA) 2"x5" W4-2 30"x30"

DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD 9 TYPE VI
9 TYPE VI 11 11 11 13 13 13 39 114 LF 194 LF 39 58 LF 39 39 87 LF 28 399 LF 21 359 LF 7 7
12'
3'
7'
3'
80'
7' 19
26'
10' 12'
7 7'
7'
3'
3' 58+00 59+00 60+00 61+00 62+00 19
80' 19 39 15 LF 17 R81 (CA), R81B (CA) 15 W10-1 R4-1 17 15 DWY DWY DWY R / W
R / W

R / W R / W R / W R / W

GRAND AVE FOOTHILL BLVD TYPE IV (L)
9 TYPE IV (L)
9 21 235 LF
8 244 LF
8 300 LF 108 LF 38A 19 19 19
80'
10'
10' 11' 13'
80'

11.1' 12.8' 17 LF
8 17 LF 38A 28 LF
8 12'

RAILROAD R/W
RAILROAD R/W 63+00 64+00 65+00 66+00 67+00
12+00 13+00 TYPE VI
9 13' 13'
26' 15 R14-1, M6-6 D11-1, G33-1 (CA) , L ARROW 15 15 D11-1, M6-3 W9-1L 17 R4-7 15 R10-6L 15 R4-7, TYPE K (CA) 15 15 R13A (CA), ON POLE 15 R3-4 R10-6 15 R13A (CA) + R10-6 15 15 TYPE K-1 (CA) TYPE K-1 (CA) 15 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:47:24 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24. TYPE PER PLAN INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XX INSTALL SHARED ROADWAY BICYCLE SYMBOL PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24C. SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY D11-1 24"x18" G33-1 (CA) 24"x6" M6-3 21"x15" M6-6 21"x15" R3-4 30"x36" R4-1 18"x24" R4-7 24"x30" R10-6 24"x36" R13A (CA) 30"x30" R14-1 24"x18" R81 (CA) 12"x18" R81B (CA) 12"x5" TYPE K-1 (CA) 12"x18" W10-1 30"x30"

DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD 9 TYPE VI
9 TYPE VI TYPE IV (L)
9 TYPE IV (L)
9 9 TYPE IV (L) 13 13 45 LF 39 94 LF 39 31 141 LF 70 LF 21 38A 162 LF 8 162 LF 21 274 LF 88 LF 38A
7 7 19 19
80'
13'
10'
80'
6' 12' 10'
3'

12.5'
6' 242 LF
8 EXISTING BUS STOP RELOCATED?

11.1'

10.4' 11' 12.5' RAILROAD R/W 68+00 69+00 70+00 71+00 72+00 39 33 LF R14-1, M6-6 15 R14-1, M6-6 15 R1-1 15 R13A (CA), R10-6 15 W10-1 15 R1-1 15 15 R2-1 [40 MPH] 17 15 R3-2, R3-3 15 R3-2, R3-3 16 R2-1 [40 MPH] R3-2 15 R3-4 15 DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

WASHINGTON
AVE11 11 11 13 13 13 45 LF 39 39 53 LF 88 LF 39 200 LF 39 39 141 LF 31 703 LF 158 LF 31 31 11 LF 7 7
7 80'
10'
12'
3'
80'
5'
12' 10'
8'
3'
6'
5'
8'
3'
6'
6' 39 205 LF 73+00 74+00 75+00 76+00 77+00 10+80
10+00
10+00 10+80
7 27 LF 39 39 25 LF R1-1 15 15 R5-1 15 R2-1 [40 MPH] 15 15 R1-1 17 R81(CA) 17 R1-1, R81(CA) 17 R4-1, R81(CA) 9 TYPE VI SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:47:45 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24. TYPE PER PLAN INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XX INSTALL SHARED ROADWAY BICYCLE SYMBOL PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24C. SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY M6-6 21"x15" R3-4 30"x36" R4-1 18"x24" R13A (CA) 30"x30" R14-1 24"x18" R81 (CA) 12"x18" W10-1 30"x30" R1-1 36"x36" R2-1 24"x30" R3-2 24"x24" R3-3 30"x36" R5-1 36"x36" R10-6 24"x36"

DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY R / W R / W R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

PENNSYLVANIA
AVE 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 291 LF 39 52 LF 39 35 LF 39 88 LF 39 266 LF 39 153 LF 39 39 44 LF 31 452 LF 420 LF 31 80'
10'
12'
12'
5'
8'
5'
12' 10' 12'
5'
8'
5' 13
8'
13'
5' 13
5'
5'
12'
8'
8' 78+00 79+00 80+00
10+80 81+00 82+00
11+00 11+60 10+00 R81(CA) 18 R1-1 15 R2-1 [40 MPH], ON POLE 15 R32 (CA), 30 MIN 15 R32 (CA), 30 MIN 15 15 BUCKLE UP SIGN 18 R81(CA) 15 R1-1 15 R2-1 [40 MPH], ON POLE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH SIGN 15 DWY DWY DWY DWYDWY R / W R / W FOOTHILL BLVD

VERMONT

AVE R / W R / W R / W TYPE IV (L)
9 9 TYPE IV (L)
9 TYPE IV (L) 11 11 11 13 13 13 13 37 LF 39 59 LF 39 28 122 LF 28 120 LF 41 LF 21 21 41 LF 102 LF 21 36 LF 38A 5 5 38A 36 LF 43 LA 38A
7 12' 10'
80'
12'
5'
8'
5'
8'
80'
7'

17.5' 11' 17'
.1'
7'
11'
5'
12' EXISTING BUS STOP
12'
12'
12' 13 13 13 11 83+00 84+00 85+00 86+00
10+00 11+00 11+40
1 1
1 1 13

6.5'

5.5' 11' 11'
11'
11' 35 LF 39 39 39 LF 39 46 LF 55 LF 39 17 R81 (CA) 15 R5-1 15 R5-1 15 R14-1LTR, ON POLE 15 R3-2 15 15 SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.252 Glendora, CA Foothill Blvd Bikeways\CAD\01_Plans\2024-252_T-SPM_FOOTHILL.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:48:11 STRIPING NOTES INSTALL BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS PER DETAIL 01 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL 6" SOLID WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES AT 15' O.C. INSTALL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN A24. TYPE PER PLAN INSTALL BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER DETAIL 03 ON SHEET 54. INSTALL STRIPING DETAIL NUMBER PER CALTRANS STD, PLANS A20A-A20E XX INSTALL CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24F. INSTALL 12" LIMIT LINE PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24G. SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONFLICTING STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE THE PAVEMENT. 2. SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION SHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. INSTALL SIGN ON NEW POST. INSTALL SIGN ON EXISTING POST. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN. SIGNING NOTES SIGNS THIS SHEET ONLY R14-1 24"x18" R32 (CA) 12"x18" R1-1 36"x36" R2-1 24"x30" R3-2 24"x24" R5-1 36"x36" R81 (CA) 12"x18"

DIRECTION OF
VEHICULAR TRAVEL 6" WIDE DIAGONAL STRIPE [WHITE] PER CAMUTCD Figure 9C-104(CA) BIKE LANE LINE, TYP BOTH SIDES 6" WIDE STRIPE [WHITE] (CALTRANS STD PLAN A20D, DETAIL 39) 45°
20'-0" TYP. AS SHOWN ON PLANS 4" WIDE WHITE LINES
2'-0" 1'-0"
5'-0"
12" 12" 5'-0" 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.065 Glendora, CA SGVCOG SMIP\CAD\01_Plans\_Glendora Avenue Segment\2024-065_T-SPM_DET.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:48:23 01 BICYCLE LANE CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGNO SCALE 02 BICYCLE DRIVEWAY APPROACH CONFLICT ZONE MARKING NO SCALE 04 BICYCLE BUFFER MARKING NO SCALE 03 BICYCLE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING NO SCALE PAVEMENT MARKING THERMOPLASTIC OR APPROVED EQUAL 6'-0" OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS (DO NOT EXTEND PAST EDGE OF GUTTER) 4'-0"
(OR PER PLANS)
4'-0" GAP
(OR PER PLANS) 6" WIDE STRIPE [WHITE] (CALTRANS DET 39A) IS OMITTED WHEN CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS ARE AGAINST CURB/GUTTER 6" WIDE STRIPE [WHITE] (CALTRANS DET 39A) TYP. BOTH SIDES PAVEMENT MARKING THERMOPLASTIC OR APPROVED EQUAL 6'-0", 5'-5", OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS (DO NOT EXTEND PAST EDGE OF GUTTER) 4'-0"
(OR PER PLANS)
4'-0" GAP
(OR PER PLANS) 6" WIDE STRIPE [WHITE] (CALTRANS DET 39A) IS OMITTED WHEN CONFLICT ZONE MARKINGS ARE AGAINST CURB/GUTTER 6" WIDE STRIPE [WHITE] (CALTRANS DET 39A) TYP. BOTH SIDES BIKE LANE ARROW PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24A [WHITE] BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24C [WHITE] 3'-4" 6'-6" 6'-0" 5'-0"
17'-6" 6" 1'-9" 06 PARKING SPACE MARKINGS NO SCALE 07 CHEVRON MARKING NO SCALE 37+00.00 38+00.00 39+00.00 40+00.00 41+00.00 42+00.00 43+00.00 PI: 39+92.88 37+50.00 38+50.00 39+50.00 40+50.00 41+50.00 42+50.00 1-W-Ø6
1-W-Ø1
3-W-Ø6
4-W-Ø6
4-E-Ø2
3-E-Ø2
1-E-Ø5
1-E-Ø2 3-S-Ø4 1-S-Ø7 3-N-Ø8 1-N-Ø3 245' TO LIMIT LINE 230' TO LIMIT LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 ROW
ROW
ROW
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW 4 4 2-N-Ø8 1-N-Ø8
185' TO
LIMIT LINE 1-S-Ø4 2-S-Ø4
270' TO
LIMIT LINE 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (35MPH) BARRANCA AVENUE (40MPH) 40 MPH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (40MPH) BARRANCA AVENUE (40 MPH) Ø4Ø8 Ø2 Ø6 Ø3 Ø5 Ø7 Ø1 POLE 24-4-100 35' 11' 9' 30' 8 Barranca Ave(N) 14' 3' 5' 13' 3 2-MAS 0' - 6 - - 5' Foothill Blvd(N) 224468 577131 101W 25' 35' 2-MAS 19-4-100 SV-1-T SV-1-T SV-1-T SP-1-T SP-1-T SP-1-T SP-1-T SP-1-T 101W 101W M.A. LUM. 12' 12' 12' HEIGHT 30' 30' 1-A --- 12' 10' 10' 10' 30' --- 101W TV-1-T SV-1-T 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 30' --- TV-1-T SP-1-T 3' 24-4-100 2-MAS 1-A TV-1-T 1-A - - 10' - TV-1-T SP-1-T - 19-4-100 SP-1-T EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS LABELED: NEW (N), RELOCATED (R), OR REMOVE AND SALVAGE (RS). INSTALL 3 INCH REFLECTIVE BORDER ON ALL BACKPLATES PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN ES-4C. 2418 - - 7 1-A 3 - - Ø LOCATION POLE M.A. SIG. TYPE MAST ARM POLE ARROW A B REMARKS MTG. QUAD. VEH. SIG. MTG. PED. SIGNAL APS PPB LED LUMINAIRE STANDARD NO. POLE SCHEDULE 5 4 I.S.N.S. 2-MAS 6 7' 3' 4 CALTRANS YEAR 2018 UNKNOWN 2018 UNKNOWN 2018 UNKNOWN 2018 UNKNOWN Barranca Ave(N) Foothill Blvd(N) 44 5 ALL CONDUITS AND CONDUCTORS ARE EXISTING CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE PUSH BUTTON LOCATION 5 86 7 1 3 24 LEGEND STREET NAME SIGN VIDEO DETECTION ZONE EXISTING CAMERA EXISTING LOOP DETECTOR ABANDONED LOOP DETECTOR PROPOSED LOOP DETECTOR 5 5 5 5 T RAFFIC 7-2-2026 55 of 70 6965 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 81+00.00 82+00.00 83+00.00 84+00.00 85+00.00 86+00.00 81+50.00 82+50.00 83+50.00 84+50.00 85+50.00 86+50.00 16''W T T T T T T T T T T T 1-W-Ø2
2-W-Ø2
3-W-Ø2
3-E-Ø2
2-E-Ø2
1-E-Ø2 1-S-Ø4 2-S-Ø4 4-N-Ø4 2-N-Ø4 1-N-Ø4 230' TO LIMIT LINE 230' TO LIMIT LINE ROW
ROW
ROW
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW 7 6 5 3 2 1 AB AB AB AB
4-W-Ø2
4-E-Ø2 4 8 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (40MPH) VERMONT AVENUE (25MPH) VERMONT AVENUE (25MPH) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (40MPH) Ø4Ø8 Ø2 Ø6 Ø3 Ø5 Ø7 Ø1 NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED POLE 17 20' 7.5' 7' 28'-6" 4 Vermont Ave(N) 8' 4' 9' 3.5' 3 - 11' - 6 - - 14' - 224424 577131 87W(N) - 20' MAS 15 SV-1-T(N) SV-1-T SV-1-T(N) SP-1-T SP-1-T SP-1-T SP-1-T SP-1-T 87W(N) 87W(N) M.A. LUM. 12' 12' 12' HEIGHT 28'-6" 28'-6" 1-A --- 12' 10' 10' 10' 28'-6" --- 87W(N) TV-1-T SV-1-T 3' 5' 4' 2.5' 3' ---- TV-1-T SP-1-T 2' 17 MAS 1-A TV-1-T 1-A - - 10' - TV-1-T(N) SP-1-T - 15 SP-1-T EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS LABELED: NEW (N), RELOCATED (R), OR REMOVE AND SALVAGE (RS). INSTALL 3 INCH REFLECTIVE BORDER ON ALL BACKPLATES PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN ES-4C. 2418 - - 7 1-A 3 - - Ø LOCATION POLE M.A. SIG. TYPE MAST ARM POLE ARROW A B REMARKS MTG. QUAD. VEH. SIG. MTG. PED. SIGNAL APS PPB LED LUMINAIRE STANDARD NO. POLE SCHEDULE 5 4 I.S.N.S. - 2 19.5' 6' 4 CALTRANS YEAR 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 Vermont Ave(N) - 44 5 SV-1-T(RS) SV-1-T(RS) TV-1(RS) CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE ALL EXISTING UNLESS NOTED N=NEW PUSH BUTTON LOCATION 5 86 7 1 3 24 LEGEND STREET NAME SIGN VIDEO DETECTION ZONE CAMERA NEW LOOP DETECTOR ABANDONED LOOP DETECTOR SEE GLENDORA TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN T RAFFIC 9 UNKNOWN 2 POST 7-2-2026 56 of 70 6965

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
45+00 46+00 47+00 85+00.00 86+00.00 87+00.00 88+00.00 89+00.00 90+00.00 91+00.00 PI: 87+90.13 85+50.00 86+50.00 87+50.00 88+50.00 89+50.00 90+50.00 91+50.00 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G T T T T T T T T T T T 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 6 7 6 7 8 9 AB 5 7 1 2 4 8 5 AB 1 23 4 5 6 78 9 11 12 3 AB 10 CB CC CB 1-W-Ø2
1-W-Ø5
2-W-Ø2
3-W-Ø2
4-W-Ø2
3-E-Ø6
4-E-Ø6
2-E-Ø6
1-E-Ø1
1-E-Ø6 2-S-Ø8 1-S-Ø3 2-N-Ø4 1-N-Ø7 1-N-Ø4 230' TO LIMIT LINE 230' TO LIMIT LINE 130' TO

LIMIT LINE
ROW
ROW
ROW
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW EXISTING SERVICE POINT CC CB 10 CC AB AB AB AB CB 13 10 12 11 11 11 7CB CB CB 11 7 7 13 13 13 12''W 5 1-S-Ø8
185' TO
LIMIT LINEAB CB 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (40MPH) GLENDORA AVENUE (25MPH) CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE GLENDORA AVENUE (35MPH) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (40MPH) PUSH BUTTON LOCATION 5 86 7 1 3 24 POLE 19A-4-100(N) 30' 9.1' 13.8' 35' - 15.1' 17.1' 7.7' 7.5' 3 10.7' 6 - 11.0' 68824 577131 96W(N) 30' 30' 19A-3-100(N) SV-1-T(R) SV-1-T(R) SV-1-T(R) SP-1-CS(R) SP-1-CS(R) SP-1-CS(R) SP-1-CS(R) SP-1-CS(R) 96W(N) 96W(N) M.A. LUM. 15' 15' 15' HEIGHT 35' 35' 1-A(N) --- 15' 10' 10' 10' 35' --- 96W(N) TV-1-T(R) SV-1-T(R) 8.6' 10.7' 11.8' 10.3' 10.3' 40' --- TV-1-T(R) SP-1-CS(R) 10.2' 19A-4-100 1-A(N) TV-1-T(R) 1-A(N) - - 10' - TV-1-T(R) SP-1-CS(R) - 26A-4-100(N) SP-1-CS(R) EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS LABELED: NEW (N), RELOCATED (R), OR REMOVE AND SALVAGE (RS). EXACT POLE LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY CITY ENGINEER. NEW POLES, MAST ARMS, AND LUMINAIRE ARMS SHALL BE PAINTED HUNTER GREEN PER THE CITY OF GLENDORA SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL 3 INCH REFLECTIVE BORDER ON ALL BACKPLATES PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN ES-4C. 2418 - 7 1-A(N) - - Ø LOCATION POLE M.A. SIG. TYPE MAST ARM POLE ARROW A B REMARKS MTG. QUAD. VEH. SIG. MTG. PED. SIGNAL APS PPB LED LUMINAIRE STANDARD NO. POLE SCHEDULE 5 8 I.S.N.S. 2 18.9' 10.2' 8 CALTRANS YEAR 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 64 5 * PROTECTED/PERMISSIVE ALL NEW CONDUCTORS AND CABLES NEW CONDUIT UNLESS NOTED (E) = EXISTING 9 2025 2 POST(N) - - 5'7" - - - 4(N) 3 - 12.9' 10' LEGEND STREET NAME SIGN VIDEO DETECTION ZONE CAMERA NEW LOOP DETECTOR ABANDONED LOOP DETECTOR SEE VERMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN Glendora Ave(N) MAS-5A(R) -- Foothill Blvd(N) MAS-5A(R), MAS(N) MAS-5A(R), MAS(N) -- MAS-5A(R) Glendora Ave(N) Foothill Blvd(N) - 1211111111 T RAF FIC 6 7-2-2026 57 of 70 6965 10+00
10+00
11+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 14+35 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00 34+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 18+73 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ADA AVE

WALNUT AVE

GLENDORA AVE
340 S. GLENDORA MEDICAL OFFICES

GLENDORA AVE
410 S. GLENDORA MEDICAL OFFICES

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY VISTA
BONITA 10+00
10+00
11+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 14+35 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00 34+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 18+73 4 3
2 2
2 1 1
2 2
2 1
1 B
A
1 3
3 1
3 3 3
1 1
3 3 3 3
1 3
3 3
3 1 ELC
ELC

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
3 6 7
7 7
7 7
3 7
6 6
6 6
6 6
7 7 7
7 6
7 7 7
7 6
6 1A
2A
1A
2A
2A
2A
2A
1B
1B
1B
2B
2B
2B
2B
2B
2B
7 B
1 B
1 B
1 B
2 B
2 B
2 1B
1B
3B
3B
3B
3B
4B
4B
B
4B
1A
4 CB
2B
CB
3 4B

2.30' 2.00'
6 6 7
1 1
3 3
3 3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 1 1
3 2
2 1
3 4
3 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 3
1 3
1 1
4 6
1 4
5 8
7 6
6 6
6 6
6 3
6 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
6 6 6 6
7 6 6 6
6 7
7 7
7 7 7 7
7 7
3 7 7
6 7
SC

EXISTING SCE PULLBOX
7 8 EXISTING

SCE PULLBOX
5 SC
9 6
6 6
7 7
4 87+00 88+00 89+00
PI: 87+90.13 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 11+00 12+00 13+00

GLENDORA AVE

GLENDORA AVE FOOTHILL BLVD

GLENDORA PUBLIC LIBRARY CARROLL AVE

GLENDORA AVE GLENDORA ALLIANCE CHURCH
224 GLENDORA AVE

PROFESSIONAL BUILDING

GLENDORA

EMPLOYMENT AGENCY
THE DERBY BUILDING 87+00 88+00 89+00
PI: 87+90.13 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 1 1
1 1 2 2
2 2
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 1
3 3
1 1 1
1 1
1 3
1 1
1 1 1 1
ELC
1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 6 6
6 6
6 6 6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6 6 6
6 6
6 3B3B
3B
3B
3B
3B
4B
4B
4B4B
4B
4B
4B
4B
4B
4B
4B
4B
4B 4B
4B
3B 3B
3B3B3B
3B3B
3B
3B
3B
3B
3B
3B
4B
4B
4B
3 3
3 3 3
3 3
3 3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3 3
1 1
3 3 3
3 3
3 1
3 3
3 3
3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7 7 7 7
7 7
6 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7 7
7 6
6 6
6 7
10 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Users\KSegu\DC\ACCDocs\Ardurra, Inc\2025-1143-00\Project Files\04-Prod\03-Dwgs\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 02, 2026 - 13:20:21 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

R ROFES ION

P ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
C
LI F
A

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL

X CIRCUIT DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 INSTALL NEW POST TOP LUMINAIRE AND STANDARD (FURNISHED BY THE CITY) AS SHOWN ON PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PER DETAIL "D". INSTALL NEW 35.9W, 4828 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR TEMP, 240 VOLT LED CORN COB LUMINAIRE WITH PHOTOCELL. FURNISH AND INSTALL DOUBLE FUSEHOLDER WITH 5 AMP FUSES (TRON #HEX-AA) IN ADJACENT PULL BOX AS PER DETAIL "C". INSTALL STANDARD ON NEW FOUNDATION PER DETAIL "D". 2 INSTALL NEW POST TOP LUMINAIRE AND STANDARD (FURNISHED BY THE CITY) AS SHOWN ON PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PER DETAIL "D". INSTALL NEW 35.9W, 3824 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR TEMP, 240 VOLT LED CORN COB LUMINAIRE WITH HOUSE SIDE SHIELD. FURNISH AND INSTALL DOUBLE FUSEHOLDER WITH 5 AMP FUSES (TRON #HEX-AA) IN ADJACENT PULL BOX AS PER DETAIL "C". INSTALL STANDARD ON NEW FOUNDATION PER DETAIL "D". 3 INSTALL #3 1/2 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B", DETAIL "C", AND DETAIL "E". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCH ADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE CONFIGURED PER DETAIL INDICATED ON PLAN, IF APPLICABLE. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCE FASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT). 4 INSTALL #5 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCH ADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCE FASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT). 5 INSTALL NEW TYPE III-BF MYERS SERVICE CABINET AND FOUNDATION PER DETAIL "A". SERVICE CABINET SHALL BE MEUG-20X-316-100-SCE-120/240-1PH/3W. INSTALL 3" PVC CONDUIT WITH PULLROPE FROM SERVICE CABINET TO 5" FROM SCE VAULT. PROVIDE BREAKERS FOR THE REQUIRED CIRCUITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND CONNECT WIRING. SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE SAME NUMBER OF RELAY CONTACTORS AS CIRCUITS. LABEL CIRCUITS PER NEC. PROVIDE ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON DETAIL "A". COORDINATE CONNECTION AND CORE DRILLING WITH SCE PLANNER. 6 RESTORE DECORATIVE PARKWAY, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, PAVEMENT, HARDSCAPE, AND LANDSCAPING. 7 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET WITH 2-#8 STRANDED COPPER INSULATED CONDUCTORS & 1-#8 BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR. SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONDUCTOR COLOR DESIGNATION.8 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET WITH 4-#8 STRANDED COPPER INSULATED CONDUCTORS & 1-#8 BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR. SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONDUCTOR COLOR DESIGNATION. 9 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET WITH 8-#8 STRANDED COPPER INSULATED CONDUCTORS & 1-#8 BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR. SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONDUCTOR COLOR DESIGNATION. 10 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC EMPTY CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET WITH PULL ROPE. CB INSTALL CONDUIT IN EXISTING PULLBOX. SC SPLICE NEW CONDUCTORS TO THE EXISTING CONDUCTORS. GENERAL NOTES 1 ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PROVISIONS; THE PROJECT PLANS, INCLUDING DETAIL SHEET; THE CITY’S STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS, INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS; STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION), INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS; AND CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (LATEST EDITION). 2 ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST AMENDED EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES. 3 ALL CONDUITS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, SHALL BE LOCATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLAN 4.01. CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALLED BY TRENCH/BORING METHODS AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.4 SPLICES SHALL BE MADE IN PULL BOXES BY MEANS OF END-TO-END CRIMP TYPE CONNECTORS AND T&B STA-KON C-TAP, 2D-8 OR PRE-APPROVED EQUAL, AS SHOWN ON DETAIL SHEET. MULTIPLE WIRE SPLICES SHALL CONFORM TO T&B MF SPECIFICATIONS.5 CONDUIT ENDS SHALL BE SEALED WITH DUCTSEAL OR PRE-APPROVED EQUAL. 6 PULL BOXES SHALL BE NO. 3½ F (EISEL) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. INSTALLATION OF PULL BOX AS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON DETAIL SHEET. PULL BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED NO MORE THAN 180’ APART, AND BIDS SHALL INCORPORATE THIS MINIMUM STANDARD. 7 PROTECT EXISTING SURVEY MARKERS IN PLACE.8 WHERE SIDEWALK REPAIR IS REQUIRED RESULTING FROM CONTRACTOR’S OPERATIONS FOR LIGHTING WORK, INCLUDING UTILITY POTHOLING AND BORING PITS, THE ENTIRE PANEL OF SIDEWALK AFFECTED SHALL BE REPLACED AND THE COST FOR SUCH WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BID PRICES FOR LIGHTING WORK, AND NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED. NO SIDEWALK PANEL REPLACEMENT SHALL BE SMALLER THAN 5 FEET WIDE. 9 ALL NECESSARY PAVING REPAIRS TO RESTORE SURFACES TO MATCH ADJACENT AREAS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BID PRICES FOR LIGHTING WORK AND NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED THEREFOR. TRENCHES RESULTING IN PAVEMENT WIDTH OF 5’ OR LESS SHALL BE REMOVED TO EDGE OF GUTTER OR PAVEMENT JOINT. ALL TRENCH PATCHING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN EACH STREET/SIDEWALK WITHIN 5 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK WITHIN THAT STREET/SIDEWALK. TRENCHING SHALL ONLY BE ALLOWED IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 10 ALL EXISTING SUBSTRUCTURES SHOWN ON PLANS ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORDS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT FOR ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ALL SUBSTRUCTURES. 11 ALL REFURBISHED STREET LIGHT POLES FURNISHED BY THE CITY SHALL INCLUDE STAINLESS SET SCREWS, LIBERALLY COATED WITH ANTI-SEIZE COMPOUND, INCLUDING ALL THREAD FASTENERS. 12 CIRCUIT “A1” CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BLUE AND LT. RED CIRCUIT “A2” CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BLACK AND RED CIRCUIT “B1” CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BROWN AND LT. RED CIRCUIT “B2” CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BLUE AND YELLOW CIRCUIT “B3” CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BROWN AND LT. BLUE CIRCUIT “B4” CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BLACK AND YELLOW 13 CONTRACTOR MAINTENANCE OF CIRCUITS – UPON COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EXISTING CIRCUITS AND SHALL REPAIR/REPLACE ANY DAMAGED EQUIPMENT WITHIN 24 HOURS, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF CIRCUIT DISCONNECT. 14 CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT AND COMPLY WITH A “SCHEDULE OF WORK” PLAN INDICATING THE WORK SCHEDULE AND LOCATIONS OF WORK FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. ANY REVISIONS TO THE SCHEDULE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK 15 CONTRACTOR’S STAFF SHALL HAVE A VALID “CALIFORNIA ELECTRICIAN CERTIFICATION” IN POSSESSION AT ALL TIMES AT THE PROJECT SITE. 16 ALL EXISTING CURBS, LANDSCAPING, AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. ANY DAMAGED ITEMS RESULTING FROM CONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL BE REPLACED PER CITY REQUIREMENTS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 17 PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL MATERIAL SUBMITTALS ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 18 PROTECT ALL TREES IN PLACE PER CITY’S TREE PROTECTION ZONE GUIDELINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FOR TRIMMING OR REMOVING. CONTACT CITY OF GLENDORA FOR ANY CONFLICTS. 19 CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE NEW SERVICE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING OTHER ITEMS OF WORK. 20 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 1/4–20x1 ½ BH PENTA–PLUS M/S SS(9012584)(7801650) LOCKS ON ALL STREETLIGHT HAND HOLES. ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE COATED WITH ANTI–SEIZE COMPOUND. 21 ALL NEW PULL BOXES SHALL BE TAMPER–PROOF WITH STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING BOLTS/NUTS. LOCK NUTS SHALL BE 3/18–16 PENTA NUT 316SS. ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE COATED WITH ANTI–SEIZE COMPOUND. 22 CONSTRUCTION AREAS SHALL BE SAFE FOR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 23 ANY CHANGES TO BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENTS. 24 CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL PROPOSED STANDARDS, CONDUIT, AND CABINET LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PROCURING EQUIPMENT. THIS INCLUDES LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, STANDARDS, CONDUITS, AND CABINETS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO PROCURING THE EQUIPMENT BY POTHOLING. PAYMENT FOR POTHOLING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS PRICE BIDS FOR LIGHTING INSTALLATION, AND NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE. 25 CONDUIT THAT IS TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE SHALL HAVE ALL WIRES OR CABLE REMOVED. THE CONDUIT SHALL THEN BE REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 FOOT (300 MM) BELOW THE SURFACE AND HAVE BOTH ENDS CRIMPED OR CAPPED. 26 PROPOSED CONDUIT ROUTING SHOWN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAYS SHALL BE ROUTED AWAY FROM THE TREE ROOTS. CONDUIT SHALL GO AROUND EXISTING STORM INLETS, FIRE HYDRANTS, PULLBOXES, AND POLES WHERE PRESENT. CONDUIT TO BE BORED UNDER EXISTING SIDEWALK. 27 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONDUIT, PULLBOXES AND POLES BEFORE THE CIVIL CONSTRUCTION, WHERE CIVIL CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE LABEL QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PED LIGHT POLE 57 ULA-A5-D-U-SYM-VMx-7030-BK OR EQUIVALENT PROPOSED PED LIGHT POLE WITH HSS 17 ULA-A5-D-U-SYM-VMx-7030-HSS-BK OR EQUIVALENT LEGEND EXISTING SCE LIGHT POLE/LUMINAIRE ARM EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE WITH LUMINAIRE EXISTING PED LIGHT POLE EXISTING STREET / PED LIGHTS POLE PROPOSED SCE LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED CONDUIT TRENCH/BORE (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED PED LIGHT POLE (INNER CIRCLE REPRESENTS FOUNDATION DIAMETER) PROPOSED PED LIGHT POLE WITH HSS (INNER CIRCLE REPRESENTS FOUNDATION DIAMETER) PROPOSED CONDUIT TRENCH/BORE PROPOSED PULL-BOX PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE PEDESTAL PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE NUMBER ELC 07/06/2026 5858 of 706965

E E E E E E E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E

E E E E
8''W 8''W 8''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 8''W
10''W 10''W
3''G
4''G
4''G
4''G 4''G
4''G
6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G 6''G
10''G 10''G
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T T T T T T T T T T 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W GV
WM
TSPB
ER
ER
E
LP
EPB
FH
CO
CO
WV
SIGN
WV
SIGN
SD
WV
S
SIGN
SIGN T
SIGN
FH T
CO WV
T
T
SIGN
WV VV
TSPB
TSPB
TS
WV
TSPB
EPB
TSPB
TSPB
WM
TS
TS
SD
TSPB
SD
TSPB
LP
SD
DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00
30+00 31+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+0030+00 31+00 STA:18+17.82 STA:19+23.41 STA:21+21.74
4 3
2 2
2 1 1
A
STA:18+85.07
STA:19+44.55
STA:20+04.92 STA:20+76.08 STA:21+20.85
R / W
R / W
R / W
3 6
7 7
7 7 7
A
1 A
2 A
1 A
2 A
2 A
2 A
2 A
1 CB

2.30'

2.00'
7 1 1
3 3
3 3 3
1 4
5 8
7 6
6 6
6 6
6 SC

EXISTING SCE PULLBOX
6 4
E
E
E
E
E

E E E E E E E E

E E E E E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN

SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN
E
E
8''W
24''W
24''W
24''W
24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W
10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W
10''W 10''W 10''W
8''W
6''W 6''W
6''W
10''G 10''G 10''G
2''G 2''G
10''G 10''G 10''G 10''G 10''G 10''G 10''G 10''G 10''G
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
10''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD 33''SD
24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W 24''W
8''G 8''G 8''G
LP
GV
VV
TS
TSPB
TSPB
TS
SIGN
TSPB
EPB
WV
TSPB
EPB
EPB
WV
TSPB
SD
EPB
EPB
GV VV
TSPB
SD
TS
WV
WV
SIGN
TSPB
TS
SIGN
SD
SIGN
SIGN
S
WV
WV
WV
SIGN
VV
VV
WV
SIGN
SD
SIGN

TS TSPB T
T
SIGN
SIGN
WV
WV
TS
VV
SD
WM
WV
WV
WV

WV SIGN
WV
SIGN
WM
SIGN
SIGN
SIGN
S
SIGN
LP
SIGN
S
SIGN
LP
SIGN
EPB
TS
FH
EPB
DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
R / W
10+00
10+00
11+00
22+00 23+00 24+00
25+00
26+00
27+00

WALNUT AVE
340 S. GLENDORA

MEDICAL OFFICES

GLENDORA AVE
410 S. GLENDORA

MEDICAL OFFICES

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
VISTA
BONITA
10+00
10+00
11+00
22+00 23+00 24+00
25+00
26+00
27+00
2 2
2 1
1 1
3 1
3 STA:24+60.15
STA:25+15.87
STA:25+62.01
STA:10+59.05
STA:26+26.03
STA:26+99.80
STA:11+30.10
STA:11+46.88
STA:27+73.03
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
STA:25+95.35

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
3 7
6 6
6 6 6
6 7
7 B
1 B
1 B
1 B
2 B
2 B
2 B
2 B
2 B
2 B
2 6
6 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
2 1
1 3
3 6
7 7
7 7 7
7 7
6 6
7 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Users\KSegu\DC\ACCDocs\Ardurra, Inc\2025-1143-00\Project Files\04-Prod\03-Dwgs\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 02, 2026 - 13:20:45 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

ROFES ION
P

ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
C
LI F
A

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL

SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
20 0 10 20 40
ROUTE 66 GLENDORA AVE

GLENDORA AVE

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 INSTALL NEW POST TOP LUMINAIRE AND STANDARD (FURNISHED BY THE CITY) AS SHOWN ON PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PER DETAIL "D". INSTALL NEW 35.9W, 4828 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR TEMP, 240 VOLT LED CORN COB LUMINAIRE WITH PHOTOCELL. FURNISH AND INSTALL DOUBLE FUSEHOLDER WITH 5 AMP FUSES (TRON #HEX-AA) IN ADJACENT PULL BOX AS PER DETAIL "C". INSTALL STANDARD ON NEW FOUNDATION PER DETAIL "D".
2 INSTALL NEW POST TOP LUMINAIRE AND STANDARD (FURNISHED BY THE CITY) AS SHOWN ON PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PER DETAIL "D". INSTALL NEW 35.9W, 3824 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR TEMP, 240 VOLT LED CORN COB LUMINAIRE WITH HOUSE SIDE SHIELD. FURNISH AND INSTALL DOUBLE FUSEHOLDER WITH 5 AMP FUSES (TRON #HEX-AA) IN ADJACENT PULL BOX AS PER DETAIL "C". INSTALL STANDARD ON NEW FOUNDATION PER DETAIL "D".
3 INSTALL #3 1/2 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B", DETAIL "C", AND DETAIL "E". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCHADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE CONFIGURED PER DETAIL INDICATED ON PLAN, IF APPLICABLE. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCEFASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT). 4 INSTALL #5 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCH ADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCE FASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT).
5 INSTALL NEW TYPE III-BF MYERS SERVICE CABINET AND FOUNDATION PER DETAIL "A". SERVICE CABINET SHALL BE MEUG-20X-316-100-SCE-120/240-1PH/3W. INSTALL 3" PVC CONDUIT WITH PULLROPE FROM SERVICE CABINET TO 5" FROM SCE VAULT. PROVIDE BREAKERS FOR THE REQUIRED CIRCUITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND CONNECT WIRING. SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE SAME NUMBER OF RELAY CONTACTORS AS CIRCUITS. LABEL CIRCUITS PER NEC. PROVIDE ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ONDETAIL "A". COORDINATE CONNECTION AND CORE DRILLING WITH SCE PLANNER. 6 RESTORE DECORATIVE PARKWAY, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, PAVEMENT, HARDSCAPE, AND LANDSCAPING.
7 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET WITH 2-#8 STRANDED COPPER INSULATED CONDUCTORS & 1-#8 BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR. SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONDUCTOR COLOR DESIGNATION.
8 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET WITH 4-#8 STRANDED COPPER INSULATED CONDUCTORS & 1-#8 BARE COPPER CONDUCTOR. SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONDUCTOR COLOR DESIGNATION.

CB INSTALL CONDUIT IN EXISTING PULLBOX.

SC SPLICE NEW CONDUCTORS TO THE EXISTING CONDUCTORS.

BEGIN PROJECT
LIGHTING STA: 17+75.00
07/06/2026 5959 of 706965

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN

SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN

SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN
10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W
10''W 10''W 10''W
2''G
2''G
2''G
2''G
2''G
4''G 4''G
4''G 4''G 4''G 4''G 4''G
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 10''W 10''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
10''W
SIGN
WM
WM
S
SIGN
PP
WM
WV
WM
EPB
LP
SIGN

FH PP LP
SIGN
SIGN
FH
SIGN
LP
WV
WV
SIGN
SIGN
WV
S
WV
WV
WV
WV
T T
LP
SIGN
SIGN
U
U
U
U DWY

DWY DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
R / W
R / W
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00 34+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00

UNITED STATES

POSTAL SERVICE

ADA AVE

GLENDORA AVE

FRONTIER

COMMUNICATIONS

FACILITY
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00 34+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
B
3 1
1 3
3 3 3
3 3
3 STA:30+14.98
STA:30+37.40
STA:31+19.01
STA:30+93.63
STA:32+08.61
STA:32+80.81
STA:33+13.75 STA:33+50.62 STA:34+18.87
STA:33+47.49
STA:14+12.06
STA:14+39.62
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
1 STA:32+01.51

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC 7 7
6 6
7 B
2 B1
B
1 B
3 B
3 B
3 B
3 B
4 B
4 B
4 B
2 CB
3 B
4 3
1 3
4 3
1 1 1 1
1 1
3 1
1 4
6 7
6 7
7 7
7 7 7 7
7 7
3 7 7
6 7
8 EXISTING

SCE PULLBOX
5 SC
9 67
6 7
E

SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN 6''W
6''W
2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G 2''G
10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W 10''W
S
LP
FH
SIGN
SIGN
WM
WM
EPB
T
SIGN
FH
WV
LP
SIGN

DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY
R / W
R / W
28+00 29+00 30+00

GLENDORA AVE
3 3
1 3 3 3
STA:27+73.03 STA:29+10.77 STA:30+14.98
STA:28+19.81 STA:28+99.63
STA:30+37.40
7 7 7
6 7 7 7
7 B
1 B
1 B
1 B
2 B
2 B
2 1 1
3 2 2 1
6 6 6
7 6 6 6
6 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Users\KSegu\DC\ACCDocs\Ardurra, Inc\2025-1143-00\Project Files\04-Prod\03-Dwgs\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 02, 2026 - 13:20:54 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

ROFES ION
P

ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
C
LI F
A

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL

SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
20 0 10 20 40

CB INSTALL CONDUIT IN EXISTING PULLBOX.

SC SPLICE NEW CONDUCTORS TO THE EXISTING CONDUCTORS.
07/06/2026 6060 of 706965
12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W SIGN
LP
FH
SIGN
SIGN
SIGN
SIGN
DWY WM
35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00

GLENDORA AVE
224 GLENDORA AVE

PROFESSIONAL BUILDING

GLENDORA

EMPLOYMENT
AGENCY

THE DERBY BUILDING
35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00
1 1
2 2 1 1
2 2
STA:35+30.05
STA:34+97.32 STA:35+52.03 STA:36+12.02
STA:36+80.64
STA:37+40.63 STA:38+00.65
STA:34+74.04
STA:35+66.86 STA:36+06.35 STA:36+65.55 STA:37+95.73
R / W
R / W
R / W
6 6 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6
6 6 6 6 6
6 3
B
3 B
3 B
3 B
3 B
3 B
4 B 4B
4 B
4 B
4 B
4 B
3 3
3 3 3 3
3 3
7 7 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 7
7 7 7 7 7
7 E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
8''W 8''W
T
T
T
T
T
T
12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 6''W
WV
LP
WV
ER
SIGN
WV
ER
ER
SIGN
ER
WV

SIGN SIGN
WV FH
SIGN
S
LP
SIGN
LP
WV
WV
WV
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
DWY
DWY
DWY
39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00
11+00 12+00 13+00 GLENDORA AVE GLENDORA PUBLIC LIBRARY

GLENDORA ALLIANCE

CARROLL AVE
CHURCH
39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00
11+00 12+00 13+00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 STA:39+89.64 STA:39+79.73 STA:40+39.78 STA:40+99.76 STA:41+75.53 STA:42+21.32 STA:42+79.74 STA:11+40.11 STA:11+38.15 STA:12+63.55 STA:12+53.95 STA:40+49.63 STA:40+99.76 STA:41+46.92 STA:42+29.64 STA:42+97.27 R / W R / W

R / W R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
STA:41+83.19
STA:41+29.75
1 1 1 1

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC
6 6 6
6 6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6 6 6
4 B
4 B
4 B
4B
4 B
4 B
4 B 4
B
4 B
3 B 3
B
3 B
3 B
3 B
3 B
3 B
3B
3 B
3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3 3
1 1
1 3
3 3
3 3 3 3
7 7
7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7
7 7
6 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6
6 7
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Users\KSegu\DC\ACCDocs\Ardurra, Inc\2025-1143-00\Project Files\04-Prod\03-Dwgs\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 02, 2026 - 13:21:09 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig. R ROFES ION P ET S AT IS ER G D T E ER OF C LI F A IA N OR IN ER E GNE AL SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40

SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN
2''G
87+00 88+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 GLENDORA AVE

FOOTHILL BLVD
87+00 88+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
STA:43+42.71
STA:43+26.45
STA:43+91.04
STA:44+73.08
STA:44+01.67 STA:44+59.75 STA:45+32.71
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
6 6
6 3B
3B
3B
3B
4B
4B
4B
3 3 3
3 3
3 3
7 7 7 7
7 7
7 6 10
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Users\KSegu\DC\ACCDocs\Ardurra, Inc\2025-1143-00\Project Files\04-Prod\03-Dwgs\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 02, 2026 - 13:21:34 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

ROFES ION
P

ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
C
LI F
A

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL

SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
20 0 10 20 40

END PROJECTLIGHTING STA: 46+45.00
07/06/2026 6262 of 706965
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
DWG Name: C:\Users\KSegu\DC\ACCDocs\Ardurra, Inc\2025-1143-00\Project Files\04-Prod\03-Dwgs\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 02, 2026 - 13:21:47 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig. R ROFESSION P ET S AT IS ER G D T E ER OF CALI F IA N OR IN ER E GNE AL NOTES:
14 SIDE VIEW

TOP VIEW

BASE DETAIL

FRONT VIEW
NOTES:

SECTION A-A

TYPICAL PULL BOX REQUIRED AT

EACH LIGHT STANDARD

ELEVATION

BASE DETAIL
NOTES:

LEVELING DETAIL

TYPICAL FUSE HOLDER
GENERAL NOTES:
120/240V CIRCUIT SPLICES

PANEL SCHEDULE - CIRCUIT - B
MOUNTING: FREESTANDING VOLTAGE: 120/240 BUS RATING: 100A TYPE: SERVICE PEDESTAL (METERED) PHASE: 1 AIC: 42KAIC SERIES RATED ENCLOSURE: NEMA 3-R (STAINLESS STEEL) WIRES: 3
MAIN: 100A/2P

CKT DESCRIPTION TRIP NOTE A B DESCRIPTION TRIP NOTE CKT 1 PED/BIKE LIGHTING #B1 30A/2P 1.20 3.29 PED/BIKE LIGHTING #B4 30A/2P 2 3 240V 1.20 3.29 240V 4 5 PED/BIKE LIGHTING #B2 30A/2P 1.50 0.00 6 7 240V 1.50 0.00 89 PED/BIKE LIGHTING #B3 30A/2P 3.44 0.00 10 11 240V 3.44 0.00 12 AMPS PER LINE: 9.42 9.42SUBTOTAL KVA: 2.26
TOTAL MINIMUM FEEDER SIZE @125% LCL (AMPS) 11.78

PANEL SCHEDULE - CIRCUIT - A
MOUNTING: FREESTANDING VOLTAGE: 120/240 BUS RATING: 100A TYPE: SERVICE PEDESTAL (METERED) PHASE: 1 AIC: 42KAIC SERIES RATED ENCLOSURE: NEMA 3-R (STAINLESS STEEL) WIRES: 3
MAIN: 100A/2P

CKT DESCRIPTION TRIP NOTE A B DESCRIPTION TRIP NOTE CKT 1 PED/BIKE LIGHTING #A1 30A/2P 0.45 0.00 2 3 240V 0.45 0.00 4 5 PED/BIKE LIGHTING #A2 30A/2P 0.75 0.00 6 7 240V 0.75 0.00 89 10 11 12
AMPS PER LINE: 1.20 1.20SUBTOTAL KVA: 0.29
TOTAL MINIMUM FEEDER SIZE @125% LCL (AMPS) 1.50
07/06/2026 6363 of 706965
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017
213-489-7443 | altago.com
DWG Name: C:\Temp\Autodesk\AcPublish_9796\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL - SCE.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 01, 2026 - 14:32:34 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

ROFESSION
P

ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
CALI F

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL
LEGEND

EXISTING SCE LIGHT POLE/LUMINAIRE ARMEXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE WITH LUMINARIEEXISTING PED LIGHT POLEEXISTING STREET / PED LIGHTS POLEPROPOSED PED LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS)PROPOSED PED LIGHT POLE WITH HSS (BY OTHERS)PROPOSED CONDUIT TRENCH/BOREPROPOSED SCE LIGHT POLEPROPOSED PULL-BOX ELC

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STREETLIGHT POLE TYPE 15 FOUNDATIONS PER CALTRANS DETAILS ES-6A, AND ES-7N. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH SCE FOR SCE TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ANEW CONVENTIONAL STREET LIGHT POLE ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS CALTRANS STANDARD ES-6A, POLE TYPE 15, WITH AN ARM LENGTH OF 8 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SCE TO INSTALL A NEW 96W, 10791 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR LED LIGHT FIXTURE, MODEL ARCH-S-PA1-100-730-U-T2R, OR AN EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2 INSTALL #3 1/2 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B", DETAIL "C", AND DETAIL "E". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCHADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE CONFIGURED PER DETAIL INDICATED ON PLAN, IF APPLICABLE. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCEFASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT). 3 RESTORE DECORATIVE PARKWAY, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, PAVEMENT, HARDSCAPE, AND LANDSCAPING.
4 RETAIN EXISTING STREET / PED / SIGNAL LIGHT POLE.
5 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET. SCE TO INSTALL PROPOSED CONDUCTORS IN THE CONDUIT.
6 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 3" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET. SCE TO INSTALL PROPOSED CONDUCTORS IN THE CONDUIT.

BC INSTALL PULLBOX IN EXISTING CONDUIT.

CB INSTALL CONDUIT IN EXISTING PULLBOX.

SC SPLICE NEW CONDUCTORS TO THE EXISTING CONDUCTORS.

GENERAL NOTES
1 ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PROVISIONS; THE PROJECT PLANS, INCLUDING DETAIL SHEET; THE CITY’S STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS, INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS; STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION), INCLUDING SUPPLEMENTS; AND CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS (LATEST EDITION). 2 ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST AMENDED EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES.
3 ALL CONDUITS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, SHALL BE LOCATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLAN 4.01. CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALLED BY TRENCH/BORING METHODS AS APPROVED BY THEENGINEER. 4 SPLICES SHALL BE MADE IN PULL BOXES BY MEANS OF END-TO-END CRIMP TYPE CONNECTORS AND T&B STA-KON C-TAP, 2D-8 OR PRE-APPROVED EQUAL, AS SHOWN ON DETAIL SHEET. MULTIPLE WIRE SPLICESSHALL CONFORM TO T&B MF SPECIFICATIONS. 5 CONDUIT ENDS SHALL BE SEALED WITH DUCTSEAL OR PRE-APPROVED EQUAL.6 PULL BOXES SHALL BE NO. 3½ F (EISEL) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. INSTALLATION OF PULL BOX AS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON DETAIL SHEET. PULL BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED NO MORE THAN 180’ APART, AND BIDS SHALL INCORPORATE THIS MINIMUM STANDARD.
7 PROTECT EXISTING SURVEY MARKERS IN PLACE.8 WHERE SIDEWALK REPAIR IS REQUIRED RESULTING FROM CONTRACTOR’S OPERATIONS FOR LIGHTING WORK, INCLUDING UTILITY POTHOLING AND BORING PITS, THE ENTIRE PANEL OF SIDEWALK AFFECTEDSHALL BE REPLACED AND THE COST FOR SUCH WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BID PRICES FOR LIGHTINGWORK, AND NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED. NO SIDEWALK PANEL REPLACEMENTSHALL BE SMALLER THAN 5 FEET WIDE. 9 ALL NECESSARY PAVING REPAIRS TO RESTORE SURFACES TO MATCH ADJACENT AREAS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BID PRICES FOR LIGHTING WORK, AND NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED.

TRENCHES RESULTING IN PAVEMENT WIDTH OF 5’ OR LESS SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE EDGE OF THE GUTTER OR PAVEMENT JOINT. ALL TRENCH PATCHING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN EACHSTREET/SIDEWALK WITHIN 5 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK WITHIN THAT STREET/SIDEWALK.

TRENCHING SHALL ONLY BE ALLOWED IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 10 ALL EXISTING SUBSTRUCTURES SHOWN ON PLANS ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORDS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT FOR ACCURACY ANDCOMPLETENESS OF ALL SUBSTRUCTURES. 11 CONTRACTOR MAINTENANCE OF CIRCUITS – UPON COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EXISTING CIRCUITS AND SHALL REPAIR/REPLACE ANY DAMAGED EQUIPMENT WITHIN 24HOURS, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF CIRCUIT DISCONNECT. 12 CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT AND COMPLY WITH A “SCHEDULE OF WORK” PLAN INDICATING THE WORK SCHEDULE AND LOCATIONS OF WORK FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. ANY REVISIONS TO THE SCHEDULE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK 13 CONTRACTOR’S STAFF SHALL HAVE A VALID “CALIFORNIA ELECTRICIAN CERTIFICATION” IN POSSESSION AT ALL TIMES AT THE PROJECT SITE.
14 ALL EXISTING CURBS, LANDSCAPING, AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. ANY DAMAGED

ITEMS RESULTING FROM CONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL BE REPLACED PER CITY REQUIREMENTS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY.
15 PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL MATERIAL SUBMITTALS ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
16 PROTECT ALL TREES IN PLACE PER CITY’S TREE PROTECTION ZONE GUIDELINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, FOR TRIMMING OR REMOVING. CONTACT CITY OF GLENDORA FOR ANY CONFLICTS. 17 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH SCE FOR NEW SERVICE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING OTHER ITEMS OF WORK.
18 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 1/4–20x1 ½ BH PENTA–PLUS M/S SS(9012584)(7801650) LOCKS ON ALL STREETLIGHT HAND HOLES. ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE COATED WITH ANTI–SEIZE COMPOUND. 19 ALL NEW PULL BOXES SHALL BE TAMPER–PROOF WITH STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING BOLTS/NUTS. LOCK NUTS SHALL BE 3/18–16 PENTA NUT 316SS. ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE COATED WITH ANTI–SEIZE COMPOUND. 20 CONSTRUCTION AREAS SHALL BE SAFE FOR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC.21 ANY CHANGES TO BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENTS.22 CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, PULLBOXES, CABINET AND CONDUIT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PROCURING EQUIPMENT. THIS INCLUDES LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, STANDARDS, CONDUITS, AND CABINETS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO PROCURING THE EQUIPMENT BY POTHOLING. PAYMENT

FOR POTHOLING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VARIOUS PRICE BIDS FOR LIGHTING INSTALLATION, AND NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE.
23 CONDUIT THAT IS TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE SHALL HAVE ALL WIRES OR CABLE REMOVED. THE CONDUIT SHALL THEN BE REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 FOOT (300 MM) BELOW THE SURFACE AND HAVE BOTH ENDS CRIMPED OR CAPPED.
24 PROPOSED CONDUIT ROUTING SHOWN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAYS SHALL BE ROUTED AWAY FROM THE TREE ROOTS. CONDUIT SHALL GO AROUND EXISTING STORM INLETS, FIREHYDRANTS, PULLBOXES, AND POLES WHERE PRESENT. CONDUIT TO BE BORED UNDER EXISTING SIDEWALK. 25 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONDUIT, PB AND POLES BEFORE THE CIVIL CONSTRUCTION, WHERE CIVIL CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED.

SPECIAL NOTES
1 CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL CONDUITS, PULLBOXES, AND FOUNDATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
2 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH SCE FOR SCE TO FURNISH AND INSTALL POLES, LUMINAIRE ARMS, LUMINAIRES, AND CABLES.
3 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, TESTING, AND TURN-ON WITH SCE ACCORDINGLY. CONTACT MR. JASON RODRIGUEZ, PLANNING SPECIALIST, LOCAL PLANNING, T&D / COVINA PLANNING DISTRICT 26, 909-471-4599, [email protected], 800 W. CIENEGA AVE., SAN DIMAS, CA 91773.
07/02/2026 6464 of 7069

E E E E E E E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E

E E E E E E E E

E E E E E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN

TS TSPB T
T
SIGN
SIGN
WV
WV
TS
VV
SD
WM
WV
WV
WV

WV SIGN
WV
SIGN
WM
SIGN
SIGN
SIGN
S
SIGN
LP
SIGN
S
SIGN
LP
SIGN
EPB
TS
FH
EPB
DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
R / W
10+00
10+00
11+00
22+00 23+00 24+00
25+00
26+00
27+00

WALNUT AVE
340 S. GLENDORA

MEDICAL OFFICES

GLENDORA AVE
410 S. GLENDORA

MEDICAL OFFICES

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
VISTA
BONITA
10+00
10+00
11+00
22+00 23+00 24+00
25+00
26+00
27+00
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
STA:10+32.73
STA:11+70.82
STA:26+41.82

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
ELC
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Temp\Autodesk\AcPublish_9796\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL - SCE.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 01, 2026 - 14:32:35 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

ROFES ION
P

ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
C
LI F
A

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL

SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
20 0 10 20 40
ROUTE 66 GLENDORA AVE

GLENDORA AVE

BEGIN PROJECT
LIGHTING STA: 17+75.00
4 4
4 4
4 4
2 SC
1 1
2 2
2 3
6 3
3 5
5 3 6
* CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SCE TO CONNECT PROPOSED CONDUIT TO THE EXIST BOX UNDER THE EXIST LIGHT POLE.
*
4 4
5 6
3 3
1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 FURNISH AND INSTALL A NEW CONVENTIONAL STREET LIGHT POLE THAT MEETS CALTRANS STANDARD ES-6A, POLE TYPE 15, WITH AN ARM LENGTH OF 8 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. INSTALL A NEW 96W, 10791 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR LED LIGHT FIXTURE, MODELARCH-S-PA1-100-730-U-T2R, OR AN EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2 INSTALL #3 1/2 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B", DETAIL "C", AND DETAIL "E". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCHADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE CONFIGURED PER DETAIL INDICATED ON PLAN, IF APPLICABLE. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCEFASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT). 3 RESTORE DECORATIVE PARKWAY, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, PAVEMENT, HARDSCAPE, AND LANDSCAPING.
4 RETAIN EXISTING STREET / PED / SIGNAL LIGHT POLE.5 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET. SCE TO INSTALL PROPOSED CONDUCTORS IN THE CONDUIT. SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONDUCTOR COLORDESIGNATION. 6 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 3" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET. SCE TO INSTALL PROPOSED CONDUCTORS IN THE CONDUIT. SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR CONDUCTOR COLORDESIGNATION.

SC SPLICE NEW CONDUCTORS TO THE EXISTING CONDUCTORS.
4 4
6 3
07/02/2026 6565 of 7069

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN

SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN

FH PP LP
SIGN
SIGN
FH
SIGN
LP
WV
WV
SIGN
SIGN
WV
S
WV
WV
WV
WV
T T
LP
SIGN
SIGN
U
U
U
U
DWY

DWY DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
DWY
R / W
R / W
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00 34+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00

UNITED STATES

POSTAL SERVICE

ADA AVE

GLENDORA AVE

FRONTIER

COMMUNICATIONS

FACILITY
30+00
31+00
32+00
33+00 34+00
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
STA:11+99.09
STA:14+91.42

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC E

DWY DWY DWY DWY DWY
R / W
R / W
28+00 29+00 30+00

GLENDORA AVE
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Temp\Autodesk\AcPublish_9796\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL - SCE.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 01, 2026 - 14:32:48 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

ROFES ION
P

ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
C
LI F
A

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL

SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
20 0 10 20 40
4 4
4 4
4 4
1 2
3 2
3 2
2 1
3 66
4 CB SC
2 6
3 SC CB
3 5
5 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STREETLIGHT POLE TYPE 15 FOUNDATIONS PER CALTRANS DETAILS ES-6A, AND ES-7N. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH SCE FOR SCE TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ANEW CONVENTIONAL STREET LIGHT POLE ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS CALTRANS STANDARD ES-6A, POLE TYPE 15, WITH AN ARM LENGTH OF 8 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SCE TO INSTALL A NEW 96W, 10791 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR LED LIGHT FIXTURE, MODEL ARCH-S-PA1-100-730-U-T2R, OR AN EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2 INSTALL #3 1/2 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B", DETAIL "C", AND DETAIL "E". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCHADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE CONFIGURED PER DETAIL INDICATED ON PLAN, IF APPLICABLE. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCEFASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT). 3 RESTORE DECORATIVE PARKWAY, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, PAVEMENT, HARDSCAPE, AND LANDSCAPING.
4 RETAIN EXISTING STREET / PED / SIGNAL LIGHT POLE.5 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET. SCE TO INSTALL PROPOSED CONDUCTORS IN THE CONDUIT.
6 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 3" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET. SCE TO INSTALL PROPOSED CONDUCTORS IN THE CONDUIT.

CB INSTALL CONDUIT IN EXISTING PULLBOX.

SC SPLICE NEW CONDUCTORS TO THE EXISTING CONDUCTORS.
* CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SCE TO CONNECT PROPOSED CONDUIT TO THE EXIST SCE PULLBOX.

EXISTING

SCE PULLBOX

EXISTING
SCE PULLBOX *
*
6 6
6 07/02/2026 6666 of 7069
12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W SIGN
LP
FH
SIGN
SIGN
SIGN
SIGN
DWY WM
35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00

GLENDORA AVE
224 GLENDORA AVE

PROFESSIONAL BUILDING

GLENDORA

EMPLOYMENT
AGENCY

THE DERBY BUILDING
35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00
R / W
R / W
R / W
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
8''W 8''W T T T T T
12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 6''W
WV
LP
WV
ER
SIGN
WV
ER
ER
SIGN
ER
WV

SIGN SIGN
WV FH
SIGN
SIGN
S
LP
SIGN
LP
WV
WV
WV
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
WM
DWY
DWY
39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00
12+00 13+00 GLENDORA AVE GLENDORA PUBLIC LIBRARY

GLENDORA ALLIANCE

CARROLL AVE
CHURCH
39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00
12+00 13+00
R / W
R / W

R / W R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
STA:39+58.84

ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC ELC
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Temp\Autodesk\AcPublish_9796\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL - SCE.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 01, 2026 - 14:33:16 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig. R ROFES ION P ET S AT IS ER G D T E ER OF C LI F A IA N OR IN ER E GNE AL SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET 20 0 10 20 40 4 SC 4
3 1
2 * * CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SCE TO CONNECT PROPOSED CONDUIT TO THE EXIST BOX UNDER THE EXIST LIGHT POLE. 4

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STREETLIGHT POLE TYPE 15 FOUNDATIONS PER CALTRANS DETAILS ES-6A, AND ES-7N. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH SCE FOR SCE TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ANEW CONVENTIONAL STREET LIGHT POLE ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS CALTRANS STANDARD ES-6A, POLE TYPE 15, WITH AN ARM LENGTH OF 8 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SCE TO INSTALL A NEW 96W, 10791 LUMEN, 3000K COLOR LED LIGHT FIXTURE, MODEL ARCH-S-PA1-100-730-U-T2R, OR AN EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2 INSTALL #3 1/2 F CONCRETE PULL BOX PER DETAIL "B", DETAIL "C", AND DETAIL "E". ANY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTORE SURFACE (FULL PANELS) TO MATCHADJACENT AREA AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. PULL BOX SHALL BE CONFIGURED PER DETAIL INDICATED ON PLAN, IF APPLICABLE. PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH LOCKING BOLTS AND BRYCEFASTENER PENTA NUTS (ANTI-THEFT). 3 RESTORE DECORATIVE PARKWAY, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, PAVEMENT, HARDSCAPE, AND LANDSCAPING.
4 RETAIN EXISTING STREET / PED / SIGNAL LIGHT POLE.5 FURNISH & INSTALL NEW 1-1/2" SCH 80 PVC CONDUIT WITHIN PARKWAY/ACROSS THE STREET. SCE TO INSTALL PROPOSED CONDUCTORS IN THE CONDUIT.

SC SPLICE NEW CONDUCTORS TO THE EXISTING CONDUCTORS.
5 5
07/02/2026 6767 of 7069
6''W 6''W 6''W
16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 16''W 2''G 2''G 2''G
2''G
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W 12''W
SIGN
TS
TS
TS
TS
POST
POST
POST
SIGN
SIGN
POST
ER
LP
ER
POST
ER
LP
POST
POST
POST
SIGN
TS
TS
WV
FH
S
WV
WV WV
WV
SIGN
WV
TS
TS
SIGN
SIGN
LP
ER
SIGN
ER
SIGN
ER
ER
FH
SIGN
WV
WV
ER
ER
ER
U
WM
DWY
E
E
E
E
E
E
E

SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN
2''G
87+00 88+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 GLENDORA AVE

FOOTHILL BLVD
87+00 88+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
R / W
617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017213-489-7443 | altago.com DWG Name: C:\Temp\Autodesk\AcPublish_9796\2024-065_C-01_GLN_Sheets_ILL - SCE.dwg Plotted by: KSegu on Jul 01, 2026 - 14:33:59 SECTION4216&4217OFTHEGOVERNMENTCODEREQUIRESADIG ALERTIDENTIFICATIONNUMBERBEISSUEDBEFOREA"PERMITTO EXCAVATE"WILLBEVALID.FORYOURDIGALERI.D.NUMBERCALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICEALERTAT811TWO(2)WORKINGDAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. WEB ADDRESS: www.digalert.org or www.call811.com UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Know what'sbelow. Call 811before you dig.

ROFES ION
P

ET S AT

IS ER G
D
T E ER
OF
C
LI F
A

IA N OR

IN ER E GNE
AL

SCALE PLAN SCALE FEET
20 0 10 20 40
END PROJECTLIGHTING STA: 46+45.00
4 4
4 4
4 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
4 RETAIN EXISTING STREET / PED / SIGNAL LIGHT POLE.
4 07/02/2026 6868 of 7069
WV WV

S WV WV WV WV

T T SIGN OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN 10''W 10''W 10''W 2''G 2''G 2''G 4''G 4''G 4''G 4''G 4''G
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
12''W 12''W 10''W
10''W
R
EQ. EQ.
8" TYP. C. SMALL BOULDER SEE DETAIL 2/PLA.1 FOR DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES A. LARGE BOULDER SEE DETAIL 2/PLA.1 FOR DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES B. MED BOULDER SEE DETAIL 2/PLA.1 FOR DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES MOUNTABLE CURB AND TRUCK APRON, SEE CIVIL SHEET C.2 DECOMPOSED GRANITE, SEE DETAIL 3/PLA.2 COBBLE, SEE DETAIL 2/PLA.1 SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY TREES Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 36" Box 3 PLANT SCHEDULE - TRAFFIC CIRCLE HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE SIZE DETAIL Decorative Cobble Buff Mexican Beach Pebble 2" - 4" 4/PLA.1 Decomposed Granite (Stabilized) California Gold 3 8" Minus, Stablized 3/PLA.2 Decorative Boulders Pale Sunset Boulders 1' - 4' 4/PLA.1 Round Planter Precast Concrete 30- 3 4" x 22" 1/PLA.2 Bike Racks Powder Coated Tube/UX238-IG 30" x 34" x 2- 3 8" 2/PLA.2 Steel Edging Sure-loc Sure-edge
316" x 4" x 16' 6/PLA.1 Montana Bark Nuggets Mulch 1/2" - 3/4" TREES GROUNDCOVERS Agave attenuata Foxtail Agave 5 Gal. 13 Install 1 per each planter Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostraus' Trailing Rosemary 1 Gal. 52 Install 4 per each planter SYMBOL TYPE SPECIFICATION NOTES: PLANT SCHEDULE - RAISED CONCRETE PLANTERS 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.065 Glendora, CA SGVCOG SMIP\CAD\01_Plans\_Glendora Avenue Segment\2024-065_L_PLA_DET_GLN.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:48:49 PLAN ENLARGEMENT - GLENDORA AVE AND ADA AVE TRAFFIC CIRCLE 1 1" = 10'-0" STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGING
6 N.T.S. 2X ROOTBALL TYP. NAIL EACH TREE TIE TO STAKE USING GALVANIZED NAILS RUBBER TREE TIES IN OFFSET LOOPS AROUND TRUNK AND STAKE DO NOT REMOVE SIDE GROWTH ALONG TRUNK. PRUNE ONLY AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2-2" DIAMETER 10' MIN LENGTH LODGEPOLE STAKES AND 4 TIES. TOP TIES SHALL BE 3" BELOW TOP OF STAKE. TIES SHALL ALLOW TREE TO MOVE FREELY WITHOUT ALLOWING TRUNK OR BRANCHES TO RUB AGAINST STAKE 36" BOX TREE WATERING BAG TREEGATOR ORIGINAL OR EQUAL TOP OF ROOTBALL 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE, TYP. 3" SHREDDED BARK MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS BACKFILL PLANTING PIT SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT. BACKFILL SOIL MIX PER SPECIFICATIONS UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL 2" DIAMETER LODGEPOLE STAKE MIN 10' LENGTH PLAN SECTION NOTES: 1. DOUBLE STAKE 36" BOX TREES 2. POSITION STAKES OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALL AND ALIGN PARALLEL WITH PREVAILING WIND DIRECTION. 3. PROVIDE MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM OTHER OBJECTS AS FOLLOWS: 20' TRAFFIC SIGNALS, 12' STREET LIGHTS, 10' FIRE HYDRANTS, SEWER LINES, PAD MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, 5' FOR UNDERGROUND GAS AND ELECTRIC LINES. STEELING EDGER PER DETAIL 6, SHEET PLA.1 TREE PLANTING AND STAKING W/ WATER BAG 3 N.T.S. NOTES: 1. BOULDER / ROCK: (A) 36"- 48" | 12 QTY (B) 24"- 36" | 15 QTY (C) 12"- 24" | 22 QTY 2. FINAL LOCATION OF BOULDERS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER. 3. ALL OTHER COBBLE WITHIN LIMITS OF ROCK GARDEN/DRY RIVER BED TO BE 2"-4" COBBLE (163 SF) 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL RAIN GARDENS, DRY CREEK AND VEGETATED SWALE TO MEET THE FOLLOWING SETBACKS. 5. 3'-0" AWAY FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE (I.E. SIDEWALK, FRONT STREET) 6. 10'-0" AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE WHERE IT ABUTS A NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. 7. 10'-0" AWAY FROM THE BUILDING FOUNDATION.

C
C
C
A
B B
B
C
C VARIES - SEE PLAN SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ADJACENT D.G., WALKWAYS, AND PLANTING AREAS FINISH GRADE / D.G. 8-12" MAX DEPTH NATIVE SOIL ROCK AND BOULDERS - SEE SIZE LEGEND ABOVE NATIVE SOIL 4" MIN. SAND AND GRAVEL FOR CLAY SOILS LESS THAN 4" FOR WELL DRAINED SOILS FINISH GRADE / D.G.

A AGGREGATE BASE NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC COBBLESTONE AND BOULDER BED 4 N.T.S
5"
1/4" MIN. - 1/2" MAX. 18" MIN. - 24" MAX. 3/16" METAL EDGER AT PLANTING ADJACENT AGGREGATE SURFACING, TYP. STEEL HEADER PER MANUFACTURER SPECS ADJACENT PLANTING, TYP. STEEL STAKE PER MANUFACTURER SPECS PLANTING SOIL, 12" MIN. DEPTH EXISTING SUBGRADE GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC PER MANUFACTURER SPECS TREE PROTECTION 5 N.T.S. NOTES: 1. ALL TREES DESIGNATED TO BE SAVED SHALL BE PROTECTED BY FENCING, AS ILLUSTRATED. 2. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE AT THE TREE DRIP LINE OR AT THE EDGE DISTURBED AREA PRIOR COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE SIGN MUST CONTAIN THE LANGUAGE AS INDICATED. 4. THERE SHALL BE NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING. 5. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 2" X 6' STEEL POSTS OR APPROVED EQ. 8.5" X 11" SIGN LAMINATED IN PLASTIC SPACED EVERY 50' ALONG THE FENCE TREE PROTECTION HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE FENCING WITH 3.5" X 1.5" OPENINGS; COLOR-ORANGE. STEEL POSTS INSTALLED AT 8' O.C. 5" TH. MIN LAYER OF MULCH MAINTAIN EXISTING GRADE WITHIN THE PROTECTION FENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS KEEP OUT TREE PROTECTION AREA KEEP OUT TREE PROTECTION AREA SOIL DECOMPACTION N.T.S. 4" 6"-12" MIN. 12" MIN. 3"-6" MULCH OR DECOMPOSED GRANITE PER DETAIL 3, SHEET PLA.2. LAYER APPLIED AFTER PLANTING. SEE CIVIL LAYOUT PLANS FOR MATERIALS LOOSEN SOIL WITH AIR KNIFE TO A DEPTH OF 6"-12" AND WORK AROUND ENCOUNTERED ROOTS. 3"-6" OF COMPOST OVER LOOSENED SOIL. USING AN AIR KNIFE MIX COMPOST INTO LOOSENED SOIL. FINISHED GRADE. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAND COMPACT AROUND TREE ROOT FLARE AND ANY SURFACE ROOTS. EXISTING TREE 0.5% MIN 0.5% MIN NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK, REMOVE ALL THATCH, SOD, AND/OR WEEDS. 2. WATER ENTIRE ROOT ZONE AT END OF EACH WORK DAY. 2 617 W 7th Street, #1103 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-489-7443 | altago.com DIAL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Underground Service Alert DWG Name: N:\Shared\PROJECTS\2024\2024.065 Glendora, CA SGVCOG SMIP\CAD\01_Plans\_Glendora Avenue Segment\2024-065_L_PLA_DET_GLN.dwg Plotted by: DanielMcMahon on Jul 13, 2026 - 16:48:52 NOTES: 1. INSTALL PLANTERS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. CONSULTANT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO SELECT COLOR (FINISH), SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3. SEE CIVIL LAYOUT PLANS FOR LOCATION OR CONSULT OWNER. 2'-6 3/4" 1'-10 3/4" 2'-6 3/4" PLAN 1'-10" SECTION OPEN BOTTOM FOR EASY DRAINAGE/IRRIGATION PLUMBING (4) 1 2" INCH THEADED INSERTS CAST INTO CONCRETE TO PROVIDE EASY LIFTING POINTS INSTALL PLANTS PER SCHEDULE ON SHEET PLA.1 RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER 1 N.T.S. NOTES: 1. INSTALL BIKE RACKS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. CONSULTANT TO SELECT COLOR (FINISH), SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3. SEE CIVIL LAYOUT PLANS FOR LOCATION OR CONSULT OWNER. 27 5/8"±1/2" 30"+/-1/2" 44"
34" GRADE GRADE IN GROUND MOUNT (IG)
Ø 2 3
8" STEEL TUBING
3 8" ANCHOR ROD THRU HOLE (INCLUDED BY MADRAX) CONCRETE BICYCLE RACK 2 N.T.S. DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING N.T.S.
4" VARIES - SEE LAYOUT PLANS
6"
2" LIFTS
8" AGGREGATE WITH LIQUID POLYMER STABILIZER SET IN 2-INCH LIFTS, COMPACTED NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC ADJACENT PAVING SURFACE, SEE PLANS COMPACTED CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE SUB-GRADE, SCARIFY MIN. 8-INCH MOISTURE CONDITION TO 2% ABOVE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, AND COMPACT TO 90-95% RELATIVE COMPATION SECTION NOTES: 1. INSTALL DECOMPOSED GRANITE MATERIAL IN 1-1/2" LIFTS. UNIFORMLY MOISTEN AND COMPACT DECOMPOSED GRANITE MATERIAL SHALL BE GRADED SO THE SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED A 5% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL WITH A MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE. FLUSH 3 C I TY O F GL E N D OR A · S A N G A B R IE L V AL L E Y C O U N CI L O F G O V E RN M E N T S The Glendora People Movement
Foothill Boulevard & Glendora Avenue First/Last Mile Improvements Community Review of the Final (100%) Design Plans — Story Boards, Fall 2026 A safer, more connected Foothill Boulevard — linking the Metro A Line Station, the Glendora Village, Citrus College, adjacent businesses and the neighborhoods in between, for people walking, biking, riding, and driving.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 1 W EL C O M E — P L E A SE R EA D F I R S T
Why We Are Here, and What We Are Asking of You
The design of the Glendora Avenue & Foothill Boulevard First/Last Mile Improvements is complete (100% plans, dated July 8, 2026). On August 25, 2026, the City Council reviewed the plans, asked detailed questions about turning movements, traffic effects, and safety. They directed staff to bring the finished plans back to the community one more time before approval. These boards facilitate that conversation.

LOOK
Walk the boards in order. They tell
the whole story: the history, the
policies, the data, the design, and
the dollars.

COMPARE
Full-size sheets of the final
engineered plans are displayed
alongside these boards, with
renderings and photos.

ASK & COMMENT
Staff are here to answer questions.

Comment cards and an online
survey record what you tell us.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
Your input goes to the City Council
with the plans when they return for
a decision in September.

Every question the City Council asked on August 25, large-vehicle turning, the Glendora Avenue/Vista Bonita transition, traffic impacts, and Post Office access, is answered on these boards and in the companion Questions & Answers handout.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 2

T H E B IG PI C T UR E
One Project, Five Pieces: The Glendora People Movement
A 10+ mile network of urban trails and First/Last Mile street improvements connecting the Metro A Line Glendora Station to the Glendora Village, Citrus College, surrounding businesses and neighborhoods. The network is built along three flood-control channels and two signature streets.
10+ mi
of trails and street improvements citywide
$36.63M
estimated total cost of the full program
$21.72M
already secured — 95% grants,
earmarks & restricted funds
2011
year the first piece (urban trails) was
adopted in the Parks & Trails Master
Plan
1 San Dimas Wash Urban Trail — Phase 1 complete (2018); Phases 2 & 3 under construction (began July 2026) 2 Glendora Avenue First/Last Mile — 100% design complete; the Village-to-Station connection 3 Foothill Boulevard First/Last Mile — 100% design complete; the main subject of these boards 4 Little Dalton Wash Urban Trail — Design underway; construction funds secured (MSP Cycle 3 - 2028) 5 Big Dalton Wash Urban Trail — On hold pending funding identification GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 3

H O W WE GO T HE R E
Fifteen Years of Planning, Policy, and Public Input
2011 Parks & Trails Master Plan adopts the Urban Trail System along three flood-control channels
2018 First/Last Mile planning begins with Metro; walk audits and stakeholder interviews around the future A Line station
2019 Metro First/Last Mile Plan completed; "Roll to the Stroll" demonstration draws 3,000–5,000 people
2021 Complete Streets Resolution adopted (Feb 9);
People Movement Project branded and grant strategy approved; Local Road Safety Plan begins
2022 Local Road Safety Plan certified (Aug 23) — identifies Foothill Blvd on the high-injury network; HSIP Cycle 11 applications filed 2023 Meda Avenue permanently closed for Village plazas (Res. 2023-03); $6.6M SGVCOG agreement executed
2024 Safe Streets Ordinance 2084 adopted unanimously (Jan 23); Safe Streets Policy issued (Jul 25)
2025 2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey adopted — Foothill posted a uniform 35 mph;
A Line Glendora Station opens
2026 100% First/Last Mile plans completed (Jul 8);
Council directs one more round of community review (Aug 25) GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 4

T H E P O L IC Y F O U N DA T I ON
This Project Carries Out Policies Your City Council Already Adopted Complete Streets Resolution
Feb 9, 2021
The City Council affirmed that Glendora streets “form a comprehensive, safe and integrated transportation
network for all road users,” (pedestrians, transit riders, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, seniors, children, motorists, and freight) and kept the City eligible
for capital grants.

Safe Streets Ordinance 2084
Jan 23, 2024
Adopted unanimously (5–0) and codified as GMC
Chapter 13.18 (Safe Streets) under the authority of
CVC §21101(f) established through AB 773. The
Ordinance created the Citywide toolbox: signage,
demonstrations, quick-builds, and closures with
required outreach, a 67% resident petition threshold,
and annual reporting to the City Council.

Local Road Safety Plan
Certified Aug 23, 2022
A data-driven, State-funded analysis of five years of
collisions (2017–2021), built with Police, Public Works, LA County Fire, Metro, SGVCOG, and ActiveSGV. It
ranked high-injury locations, Foothill among them, and
unlocked federal HSIP safety grants.

Updated Circulation Element
June 2026
Adopted with the Community Plan update, it
incorporates the Metro A Line, plans a Class I bikeway
along Foothill connecting Citrus College, Azusa Pacific University, and the station, and commits the City to
enforcing safe speeds (CIR-1.5) and calming traffic
where appropriate (CIR-1.6).

Mobility Ordinance GMC Ch. 10.17
(June 2026)
Introduced June 23, 2026: no riding bikes, e-bikes, or
e-scooters on sidewalks in designated areas, including
the Village and its Foothill and Glendora Ave frontages with unsafe-riding rules, progressive fines, and a youth Diversion Program. In posted areas, including
Glendora Ave and Foothill Blvd riders belong in the
roadway; this design makes that safe.

State Law Framework
AB 1358 (Complete Streets Act), AB 773 (safe/slow
streets authority), AB 43 (safety-based speed setting), and CVC §22358.7 (Safety Corridors); the Legislature
has repeatedly directed cities to design and manage
streets around safety for all users.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 5

W HY F OO T H I L L B O UL E V A R D
The Data Put Foothill on the High-Injury Network —
Before This Project Was Designed
The 2022 Local Road Safety Plan analyzed every reported collision in Glendora from 2017–2021 using the Federal Highway Administration's methodology, weighting collisions by severity (EPDO). Foothill Boulevard emerged at the top of the list:
#1

HIGH-INJURY INTERSECTION CITYWIDE
Foothill Blvd & Barranca Ave — 36 collisions, EPDO
score 354. Recommended fixes included upgraded
signing and striping, high-speed detection and highvisibility crosswalks. #9

HIGH-INJURY CORRIDOR CITYWIDE
Foothill Blvd, Citrus Ave to Grand Ave — 91 collisions, leading factor unsafe speed, top type Broadside.

Recommended fixes: upgraded signing/striping,
enhanced pedestrian crossings and install bike facilities.

The through-line: the Local Road Safety Plan (2022) named the problems; the HSIP and Safe Streets for All (SS4A) grants (2022–2025) funded proven countermeasures; the 2025 speed survey reset the limits; and the First/Last Mile design rebuilds the street itself. Each step was approved in public by the City Council.

LRSP 2022: names the
locations → HSIP 11 & 12: signal safety → SS4A 2025: crossings + striping → 2025 E&TS: 35 mph corridor → FLM Design: rebuilds the street GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 6

SEVEN-P L U S Y E A RS OF L IS T E N IN G
This Design Was Built From Community Input —
Not Delivered to It
7+
years of sustained outreach,
from 2018 to today
1,000+
survey responses across three
major surveys
3 real-world street
demonstrations you could
walk, bike, and drive
25+
engagement activities and
public presentations
11+
partner organizations, from
Metro and SCAG to
ActiveSGV and the BID
Walk Audits · Stakeholder Interviews · Workshops · Pop-ups · Online Surveys · Public Events · Street Demonstrations Presentations to the City Council, Planning Commission, Community Services Commission, Board of Library Trustees, Business Improvement District, Community Coordinating Council, and institutional partners, with continued opportunities for input as concepts progressed into engineered plans.

One striking finding: 61% of demonstration participants surveyed had never attended a City transportation meeting, meeting people on the street reached residents that meetings never had.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 7

O U T RE A C H A T E V E R Y S T A GE
Each Phase of Input Shaped the Next Phase of Design
2018–2019

IDENTIFY NEEDS
• Stakeholder interviews
(Aug–Sep 2018)
• Community walk audit (Sep 17,
2018)
• Holiday Stroll pop-up & workshop
(Nov 2018)
• Finkbiner Park surveys
• Commission briefings
• City Council briefing (Jan 8, 2019)
• 300+ people engaged in Metro
planning
2019–2020

TEST CONCEPTS
• "Roll to the Stroll" demonstration
(Nov 22, 2019): separated
bikeway, curb extensions, parklet
• Community Workshop No. 1
(Feb 13, 2020)
• Online Workshop No. 2 (Mar
2020)
• Community Coordinating Council
(Aug 2020)
2021–2023

EXPERIENCE IT
• Five-month Glendora
Avenue demonstration
(573 survey responses)
• Virtual public meeting & activetransportation counts • Glendora Village crosswalk
demonstration (369 responses)
• Ongoing City Council,
Commission, BID & Library Board
briefings
2024–Today

ADVANCE & COMMUNICATE
• Feedback carried into engineering
design
• Christmas Parade (2024)
• Earth Day (2025)
• A Line Station opening (Sep 19,
2025)
• Council recap & MOA (Feb 25,
2025)
• These story boards are a final
review of the finished plans
before any approval
GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 8

T R Y B E F O RE Y OU BU Y
Three Real-World Demonstrations Let Glendora
Test the Ideas First
Roll to the Stroll: 2019
Glendora Ave, with the Holiday Stroll.

Separated bikeway, curb extensions,
wayfinding, and a parklet. 3,000–5,000
attendees.
89% supported the separated
bikeway; 87% the curb
extensions
81% supported the parklet; 91% the
wayfinding signs
93% said the improvements would
make them more likely to walk
or bike to the future station
Focused surveys of 37 participants; 70%
Glendora residents.

Glendora Ave Demo: 2020–2021
A five-month, full-scale trial of the
proposed lane configuration and bikeway
on Glendora Avenue.
573 survey responses
(83% Glendora residents)
59% would consider walking or biking
to the Metro station
55% said safer streets would
encourage them to walk or bike
more
Concerns logged and addressed: aesthetics (43),
traffic speed (35), parking (26), bikeway design
(19) — see Board 11.

Village Crosswalks: 2023
Temporary curb extensions and a
pedestrian refuge island at Village
crossings of Glendora Avenue.
369 survey responses collected
54% supported the curb extensions;
55% wanted them made
permanent
49% said they would walk more if
streets felt safer
Council directed permanent Village crosswalk
improvements on Sep 12, 2023 based on these
results.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 9

IN P U T W IT H RE C E IP T S
What We Heard and Exactly How It Shaped the Design

WHAT WE HEARD HOW IT SHAPED THE PROJECT
The Village's walkable character is what people love most Streetscape treatments extend the Village look and feel south toward the A Line station; antique lights, landscaping, and consistent design language People want to walk and bike, but fear driver behavior Protected bicycle facilities, shorter crossings, refuge areas, and greater physical separation were engineered into the plans
The station needs clear, intuitive connections The design creates recognizable routes linking the station, the Village, Citrus College, and neighborhoods
Traffic movements, parking, and aesthetics were concerns Concepts were refined through demonstrations, public comment, traffic analysis, accessibility review, and engineering evaluation, including large-vehicle turning checks Safer access should also support business The corridor is designed as a more inviting destination: slower speeds, better crossings, and placemaking that supports retention and investment
GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 10

W E K E PT T H E C R IT IQ U E S
The Concerns Raised in Public Input
and How the Final Design Responds
Aesthetics
(43 comments)
The temporary delineator posts people disliked in the
demos are not the project.

The permanent design uses curbs, landscaping,
decorative lighting, and hardscape: built to the City's design standards.

Traffic Speed & Flow
(35 comments)
Turn lanes are kept at key intersections, signals are
upgraded, and transitions are engineered.

Corridor traffic is lower today than in 2017 (see Board 13).

Effects and mitigations are itemized on Board 19.

Parking
(26 comments)
Demonstration feedback on parallel vs. angled parking
directly informed the layouts.

Parking changes were evaluated block by block in the
engineered plans on display today.

Bikeway Design & Location
(19 comments)
Width, buffer, and placement questions from the demos
drove the shift to protected facilities with physical
separation, rather than paint-only lanes.

Homelessness
(15 comments)
Lighting, active storefront frontage, and more people
walking are the design's response; the improvements are paired with the City's existing enforcement and
outreach programs, which this project does not
reduce. Phase 1 of the San Dimas Urban Trail, finished
in 2018, has mitigated possible homelessness impacts.

The Metro station
(15 comments)
The A Line Glendora Station opened September 19,
2025. The station is here; the question now is whether
the streets around it serve Glendora well. This project makes that investment work for local businesses and
residents.

Comment counts are from the 573-response Glendora Avenue demonstration survey (2021).

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 11

E X IS T I NG CO N D IT I ON S
Foothill Boulevard Today: What the Street Asks Drivers to Do • Roughly four miles of roadway from Citrus Avenue to Amelia Avenue. A four-lane roadway (two lanes each way) passing Citrus College, the Village core, adjacent businesses, transitioning to a two-lane roadway east of Glendora Avenue through La Fetra Senior Center, schools, and long residential stretches east of Cullen Avenue. • Posted as a uniform 35 mph since the 2025 speed survey ordinance yet measured 85thpercentile speeds of 39–45 mph ,which means typical drivers ran 4–10 mph over the new limits, with the widest gaps at the west end near Citrus College. • At Glendora Avenue, eastbound traffic already loses a lane today: the curbside lane becomes a forced right turn (an R3-7 "Right Lane Must Turn Right" sign) with a lastminute, uncontrolled merge for anyone continuing through. This condition exists now; it is not created by the project.
• Wide, straight pavement encourages speed; crossings are long; and the corridor carried the City's #1 high-injury intersection (Barranca) and a top-ten high-injury corridor (Citrus– Grand) in the 2022 Local Road Safety Plan.

THE INJURY PROFILE (2020–2024)
32% of injury collisions caused primarily by unsafe
speed — the #1 factor
68% were rear-end or broadside crashes — the
types most responsive to lower speeds
21% involved a person walking or biking (7 of 34),
clustered near Citrus College and downtown
0 fatalities in 2020–2024 — a record this project
is designed to keep
Sources: 2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey (SWITRS injury collisions, Jan 2020–Dec 2024); 2025 100% design plans; 2022 Local Road Safety Plan.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 12

T R A F F IC , ME A S U RE D T WI CE
Foothill Carries Less Traffic Than in 2017; Route 66 Fell Even Harder 0 2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Citrus–
Barranca
Barranca–
Grand
Grand–
Glendora
Glendora–
Cullen
Cullen–
Loraine
Loraine–
Valley Ctr
Valley Ctr–
Lone Hill
Lone Hill–
Amelia
Average daily traffic by segment (vehicles/day)
2017 daily traffic 2025 daily traffic
−4.9%
Average Foothill segment traffic declined from 11,997 to 11,409 vehicles/day across the eight comparable segments.
−25%
Average Route 66 traffic declined across comparable segments from Barranca Ave to Amelia Ave.
15,404
vehicles/day on the busiest segment (Valley Center–Lone Hill) well within the range where one through lane plus turn lanes performs, per FHWA road-diet guidance
Counts: Feb 21, 2017 vs. Aug 14, 2025 (single-day machine counts; the 2025 count predates the fall Citrus College term, which likely explains part of the west-end drop).

Source: 2017 & 2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Surveys.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 13 Route 66 ADT (avg.) Vehicles/Day
2017 28,520
2025 21,378

T R A F F IC , ME A S U RE D T WI CE
Injuries Are Down, But Everyday Speeds Are Creeping Up
−44%
annualized injury collisions on Foothill,
2014–16 vs 2020–24
(11.3 → 6.4 per year)
−42%
injury risk per mile driven
(0.665 → 0.389 injuries per million
vehicle-miles)
0 fatalities on Foothill in 2020–2024,
versus one in 2014–2016
+1–3
mph rise in 85th-percentile speeds on
six of eight segments — the trend the
project targets

READ THE TWO TRENDS TOGETHER
• The good news is real: extreme speeding declined (top observed speeds fell on all eight segments — at the west end from 65 mph to 52 mph), and injuries fell far faster than traffic did.
• The warning sign is also real: the middle of the speed distribution moved up. Typical drivers were measured 4–10 mph over today's 35 mph limits, and the one segment whose injury rate worsened (Citrus–Barranca) had three pedestrian collisions near Citrus College, which is why this segment is now designated a Safety Corridor under CVC 22358.7.
• Signs and City Council Policy improved safety in the corridor this far. Holding and extending these gains is what street design such as narrower lanes, engineered transitions and protected crossings, provide additional safety measures.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 14 W HY 3 5 M P H — A N D WH Y D E S IG N M A T T E RS
A Few Miles per Hour Can Make a Meaningful Difference
10%
average risk a person on foot is killed
when struck at 23 mph
25%
average risk a person on foot is killed
when struck at 32 mph
50%
average risk a person on foot is killed
when struck at 42 mph
75%
average risk a person on foot is killed
when struck at 50 mph
AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety (Tefft, 2011) — national research on pedestrian impact speeds.

WHAT THE 2025 SURVEY DID
Lowered four Foothill segments from 40 to 35 mph
under AB 43, kept 35 on the rest, and designated
Citrus–Barranca a Safety Corridor (CVC
22358.7(a)(1)) creating one uniform 35 mph street
from Citrus to Amelia. New signs are up in both
directions.

WHAT IT COSTS A DRIVER
Driving the full 3.95-mile corridor at 35 mph instead of 40 mph adds about 50 seconds, before signals, which
govern real travel time anyway. Even though the entire
corridor was not posted for 40 mph, the higher speed
was used as an example of the safety benefit
bestowed for less than a minute.

WHY DESIGN COMES NEXT
Drivers respond to the street more than the sign.

Narrower lanes, visible crossings, and engineered
transitions make 35 mph feel natural, which is exactly
what the First/Last Mile design builds.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 15 T H E 1 0 0 % D E S IG N
Foothill Boulevard: One Confident Lane Each Way, With Turn Lanes Where They Count
Project limits: Citrus Avenue to Vista Bonita Avenue · Designed by Alta for SGVCOG & the City · 100% plans dated July 8, 2026 • One through lane in each direction (generally), with dedicated left-turn lanes and a two-way left-turn lane or landscaped median where the plans show them. Through traffic is no longer trapped behind turning vehicles.
• Buffered and protected bicycle lanes with painted buffers and physical separation, connecting Citrus College toward the Village (the lawful place to ride now that GMC 10.17 prohibits sidewalk riding along these frontages).
• Pedestrian and ADA improvements: high-visibility crosswalks, curb ramps, and shorter, safer crossings.
• Travel lanes merge to one between Glendora Avenue and Vista Bonita using engineered, standard-length tapers with advance warning signs (see Board 18). • Localized pavement work only — this is primarily a restriping and safety project on Foothill, not a full reconstruction, which keeps costs down and makes future adjustment straightforward. • Configurations vary at intersections and transition areas per the plan sheets on display.

TODAY — four lanes, no turn refuge

LANE LANE LANE LANE
DESIGNED — protected, organized, predictable

BIKE BUF LANE TURN / MEDIAN LANE BUF BIKE
Typical mid-block concept — lane configurations vary, see plan sheets for exact dimensions at each station.

FHWA lists road diets as a Proven Safety Countermeasure, with typical crash reductions of 19–47% on comparable streets.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 16 T H E 1 0 0 % D E S IG N
Glendora Avenue: Extending the Village South to the Station Project limits: Route 66 to Foothill Boulevard · Full streetscape treatment with a two-inch cold mill and asphalt overlay One Lane Each Way
Generally reduced from two through lanes to one in each direction, with protected bicycle facilities matching the configuration residents tested for five months in the 2020– 2021 demonstration.

Roundabout at Ada Ave
A single-lane roundabout, an idea in Glendora's station-area visioning since about 2010 keeps traffic moving at low speed with a mountable truck apron for large vehicles.

Protected Intersection at Foothill
Corner islands physically separate people walking and
biking from turning vehicles at the corridor's key junction.

The 100% design was specifically refined for large-vehicle turning movements.

Vista Bonita / Walnut change
Northbound vehicular traffic on this block is closed and redirected at Vista Bonita/Walnut, simplifying conflicts at the approach to Foothill.
74 Antique Street Lights
Antique lights already restored with a $1.5M State allocation and waiting at the City yard will line Glendora Avenue
between Ada and Foothill.

Landscape & Hardscape
New landscaping, hardscaping, ADA-compliant ramps and
crossings extend the Village's look and feel to the station doorstep.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 17

A P O IN T WO R T H G E T T IN G E X A CT L Y R IG H T
The Project Does Not Create the Merge at Glendora Avenue; It Fixes the One That Exists
TODAY — AN UNCONTROLLED FORCED MERGE
• Approaching Glendora Avenue, the eastbound curb lane simply ends as a forced right turn, marked by an R3-7 "Right Lane Must Turn Right" sign. • Drivers who intend to continue through must find a gap and merge left at the last minute, at intersection approach speed, with no engineered taper. • This is the classic recipe for the corridor's two dominant injury types — rearend and broadside collisions (68% of Foothill injuries). • This condition exists on the street right now, before any project construction.

DESIGNED — A PREDICTABLE, ENGINEERED TRANSITION
• The 100% plans replace the ad-hoc drop with lane-reduction tapers designed to CA MUTCD and Caltrans standard lengths for the posted speed.
• Advance W4-2 "Lane Ends / Merge" warning signs give drivers notice well before the transition, instead of a surprise at the intersection. • The transition location, signing, and striping appear on the signing & striping sheets (SS series) of the plan set on display.
• The result: one decision, made early, at design speed instead of a forced maneuver in the middle of the corridor's busiest junction.

Why the distinction matters: these transitions are designed transitions built to adopted standards; not impacts created by the project. When the City Council approves the plans, it will make a finding that the design is reasonable and consistent with applicable standards under Government Code Section 830.6, the same discretionaryapproval practice used for public works designs statewide.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 18

S T R AI G HT T A L K O N T R AD E - O F F S
Every Change the Design Makes to Traffic and
How Each One Is Mitigated

DESIGN CHANGE POTENTIAL EFFECT HOW THE DESIGN & THE CITY RESPOND Fewer through lanes on Foothill &
Glendora Ave
Possible queuing at peak hours;
slightly longer trips
Left-turn lanes and two-way left-turn lane/median remove turning vehicles from the through lane; volumes (4,600–15,400 ADT) are within FHWA's comfortable road-diet range; corridor traffic is 5% below 2017 Lane merge west of Vista Bonita Drivers must merge to one lane Standard-length tapers + W4-2 advance warning replace today's uncontrolled forced-right at Glendora Ave; a net improvement over existing conditions
Roundabout at Ada Ave Unfamiliar control for some drivers Single-lane geometry with yield-on-entry is the simplest, most self-explaining roundabout form; truck apron accommodates large vehicles; FHWA data shows roundabouts cut severe intersection crashes dramatically Northbound closure at Vista
Bonita/Walnut A short local detour for some trips Traffic is redirected on adjacent streets designed to receive it; conflicts at the Ada Ave approach are simplified Possible diversion to parallel streets Neighborhood cut-through concern The 2017–2025 data shows no Foothill→Route 66 diversion pattern; the City will monitor after opening, and the Safe Streets Ordinance (annual report to the City Council) provides ready tools if any street needs calming GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 19

A N SW E R IN G T H E C O UN C IL ' S QU E S T IO N S
Fire Trucks, Buses, Delivery Trucks, and the Post Office:

Big Vehicles Still Work
Checked with Turning Templates
The 100% design was specifically refined for large-vehicle turning movements. Intersection corners, the roundabout, and the protected intersection were laid out against the turning paths of the design vehicles the standards require, including fire apparatus, transit buses, and delivery trucks.

Roundabout Truck Apron
The single-lane roundabout at Ada Avenue includes a
mountable center apron: passenger cars stay off it, while trucks and fire engines track over it to complete the turn; the standard, proven solution used at roundabouts nationwide.

Protected Intersection Geometry
The early renderings drew comment; the engineered corner islands at Foothill/Glendora were then sized and positioned so trucks and emergency vehicles make their turns; the plans on display show the final geometry.

Post Office & Business Access
Turning movements at the Post Office and other driveways along the corridors were reviewed in design. Every property keeps vehicle access; turn lanes and the two-way left-turn lane organize those movements instead of blocking a through lane.

Transit Keeps Rolling
Glendora Transit and Foothill Transit stops are maintained and coordinated with the new lane configuration.

Emergency Response
LA County Fire was a stakeholder in the Local Road Safety Plan. Center turn lanes and medians give emergency vehicles a passing path that today's four narrow lanes of stacked traffic do not.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 20

T H E P A R KI NG Q UE S T I ON , A N SW E R E D
Parking Is Still Provided and the Street Around It Is Designed to Be Safer Parking Stays On The Plans
On-street parking is provided in the final design. The 2025 speed survey records parking in service on every Foothill segment from Barranca Avenue to Cataract Avenue, and the 100% plans keep parking on the street, evaluated block by block, with the plan sheets on display showing the configuration at every location.

The Layout Residents Already Tested
The 2019 “Roll to the Stroll” demonstration was a parkingprotected bikeway: 3,000–5,000 people experienced parked cars serving as the bikeway’s physical protection, and 89% supported it. Parallel-versus-angled feedback from the
demonstrations shaped each block’s final layout.

A Buffer Ends the Door-Zone
Squeeze
Painted buffers between the parking lane and the bike lane give opening doors their own clearance. People stepping out of cars and people biking no longer share the same few feet; today a rider’s only choices on Foothill are the door zone or the traffic lane.

Slower street, easier maneuvers
Pulling into or backing out of a space against one organized lane of 35-mph traffic is a calmer maneuver than against two lanes running 40-plus. Slower, more predictable approach speeds mean real gaps, removing an everyday stress the
surveys called out.

One lane, one predictable merge
A driver leaving a space re-enters a single through lane instead of weaving across two, and the center turn lane keeps through traffic from stacking up behind a car easing into a spot; the rearend setup behind 35% of Foothill’s injuries today.

Drivers who park are pedestrians too
Every parked car ends a walking trip. High-visibility crosswalks, shorter crossings, and slower design speeds protect drivers from the moment they step out on a corridor where 21% of injury collisions already involve someone walking or biking.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 21

IT A L L C O NN E C T S
The First/Last Mile Is One Piece of a Citywide Safety Program Already Underway

PROJECT WHAT IT DOES STATUS
Meda Avenue Plazas & Village Parklets Meda Ave permanently closed (Res. 2023-03) for plazas; five demonstration projects and parklets in the Village over five years; the proving ground for the Safe Streets Ordinance Complete / Ongoing Glendora Village Crosswalks Permanent curb extensions and crossing improvements directed by Council (Sep 2023) after the 369-response demonstration. Staff is continuing to work on securing grant funding.

Directed / Fundraising
Underway
Washington Elementary Crossing Curb extensions, midblock refuge island, updated lights and signage Complete Minnesota Ave Crosswalk at La Fetra Senior Center Quick-build high-visibility crossing of Foothill Blvd installed Dec 2025 so the City can observe behavior before permanent enhancements; protecting seniors on this very corridor Installed Dec 2025 HSIP Cycle 9 — Five Elementary Schools Curb extensions, high-visibility crosswalks, flashing beacons, pedestrian countdowns, and lead intervals at Cullen, Sellers, La Fetra, Stanton & Hope Lutheran ($550K) Complete HSIP Cycles 11 & 12 — Signal Safety Protected left turns, mast-arm conversions, lighting, ADA ramps and high-visibility crosswalks at 18+ intersections, mainly Gladstone, Barranca & Route 66 ($5.0M+ with match) Cycle 11 building;
Cycle 12 in design
SS4A — Safe Streets & Roads for All Two HAWK pedestrian signals (Gladstone & Sierra Madre), protected left phasing, and new signing & striping on

3.21 miles of high-injury corridors ($2.57M federal funds) Awarded 2025 / In-Design Safe Streets Program (Ord. 2084) Resident-initiated traffic calming; Country Club Drive signage was among the first installations (Dec 2025); annual report to Council Active Citywide
GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 22 F IN A N CI A L O V E R VI E W — P A RT 1
The People Movement Project:
$21.72 Million Secured of the $36.63 Million Needed
What makes up the $21.72M secured
Restricted transportation funds — $10.43M
State/federal allocations & earmarks — $7.60M
Competitive grants — $2.63M
City CIP funds — $1.06M
95%
not City
general $

PROJECT PIECE BUDGET STATUS
San Dimas Wash Urban Trail $5,160,590 Under construction First/Last Mile (Glendora Ave + Foothill Blvd) $9,822,358 100% design complete Little Dalton Wash Urban Trail $5,639,095 Funds secured; design underway
Big Dalton Wash Urban Trail $16,006,125 (est.) Unfunded SGVCOG project management (10%) Included above Per Memorandum of Agreement
Partnership shares: SGVCOG administers $11.81M (54%); the City's contribution is $9.91M (46%), nearly all of it restricted transportation revenue and grants the City won.

Amendment 1 to the MOA (June 2026) capped SGVCOG's commitment and set the funding flow for FY 2026–27.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 23 F IN A N CI A L O V E R VI E W — P A RT 2
Beyond the Project:
$6.6 Million in Safety Grants Staff Went Out and Won

PROGRAM YEAR AWARD WHAT IT BUYS STATUS
HSIP Cycle 9 2019 $250,000 Pedestrian safety at five elementary schools (+$300K Measure M match = $550K total) Complete Local Road Safety Plan 2021–22 $48,000 (State) Citywide collision analysis 2017–2021: the data foundation and HSIP prerequisite (City share ~$5.4K) Certified Aug 2022 HSIP Cycle 11 2022 $1,733,580 Protected left turns at 6 intersections, 2 mast-arm conversions, high-visibility crosswalks (+$1,016,420 match = $2.75M)
Construction underway;
projected completion: Dec 2026
SS4A (federal) 2025 $2,565,200 Two HAWK (High-Intensity Activated crosswalk beacon) pedestrian signals, protected left phasing, signing & striping of 3.21 miles of high-injury corridors, high-visibility crosswalks Awarded; design pending
HSIP Cycle 12 2025 $2,074,590 Mast-arm conversions at 8 intersections (mainly Route 66), hardware at 2 more, lighting, ADA ramps, school-zone signs Design awarded Mar 2026
2025 E&TS Speed Survey 2025 $69,485 119 street segments surveyed; the legal basis for enforceable speed limits through 2030 17 Street Segments warranted a speed reduction Adopted Nov 2025 OTS Grant PT26120 FY 25–26 Grant-funded Police enforcement: DUI checkpoints, distracted-driving and pedestrian/bicycle safety operations Active Bottom line: $6,623,370 in HSIP + SS4A safety grants ($7.94M with local match); supplemental dollars that exist only because the City Council adopted the Local Road Safety Plan and staff competed for them. These projects add important safety improvements the General Fund could not afford.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 24

F O L L O W T HE MO N E Y
These Funds Supplement Glendora;
They Do Not Take Away From Other Priorities
Legally Restricted Revenue
Proposition A & C, Measure R & M local return, and TDA Article III are voter-approved transportation sales-tax funds. By law they can only be spent on transportation. They cannot pay for police officers, parks staff, or library hours, spending them here takes nothing from those services.

Competitive, Use-It-Or-Lose-It
The $5 M+ in Congressional earmarks, the $1.5M State allocation, ATP, Measure M subregional, HSIP, and SS4A awards were won for these specific projects. Declined or unspent, they return to Sacramento, Washington, or other cities — they do not become Glendora general dollars.

A 20-to-1 Leverage
Of the $21.72M secured for the People Movement Project, just $1.06M, about 5% is City CIP money (committed in 2019), as a required match for the grant programs. Every $1 City dollar is matched by roughly $20 of outside investment in Glendora streets.

It Buys Pavement Too
The project includes a two-inch grind-and-overlay of Glendora Avenue and localized pavement repair on Foothill. This street maintenance, that the City would otherwise fund alone also adds new signals, lighting, ADA ramps, landscaping, and 74 restored antique street lights.

If not this project, these dollars would not repave more streets or hire more staff — they would simply leave Glendora.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 25

W HO T HI S I S F O R
Slower Traffic Is a Business Strategy and a Courtesy to the People Who Live Here

FOR THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY
• Customers travelling at 35 mph can actually see a storefront; at 45 they see a blur. Slower corridors convert passing traffic into stopping traffic. • The design extends the Village's proven, walkable formula south to the station and lays groundwork toward Citrus College, connecting thousands of students and A Line riders to Glendora businesses.
• The Business Improvement District voted to support the project's grant application back in October 2021.
• Parklets, plazas, and the Meda Avenue closure have already shown in Glendora that street space for people is good for adjacent business.

FOR THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE ON FOOTHILL
• East of Cullen Avenue, Foothill is fundamentally a residential street (front doors, driveways, and families) that happens to be built like a highway.

The design acknowledges what the street actually is.
• The eastern residential segments are the ones where traffic grew (up 4% to 20% since 2017) and where speeds crept up; residents there gain the most from calmer design.
• Seniors at La Fetra Senior Center, students at five nearby schools, and Citrus College - pedestrians all cross this corridor: 21% of its injury collisions already involve someone walking or biking.
• Left-turn lanes make getting into and out of driveways calmer and safer than merging across two live lanes.
• With sidewalk riding prohibited under GMC 10.17, the protected bike lanes give kids and commuters a lawful place to ride that isn’t the sidewalk or the traffic lane.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 26

T H E R O AD AH E A D
What Happens Next and Where Your Input Lands
NOW Continued Community Review
These boards, the plan sheets, staff conversations,
comment cards, and the online survey (Fall 2026)
1 Council Decision
Staff reports your input to the City Council with the 100% plans; City Council considers approval and the
Government Code 830.6 design finding
2 Obligate the $5M Federal
Earmark
Approval unlocks obligation of the $5 Million
Congressional earmark
3 Advertise & Bid
Competitive construction bidding expected 2027 (sets
the actual construction price)
4 Build With Communication
Construction anticipated to begin in 2027: advance
notices to adjacent properties, business-access
maintenance, and a construction hotline
5 Measure & Report
Post-opening traffic and speed monitoring; Safe Streets annual report to Council; the next E&TS verifies results Delivered under a Memorandum of Agreement with SGVCOG, which manages procurement, design, and construction oversight — the model now delivering the San Dimas Wash Trail.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 27

A F A IR QU E S T IO N D E S E R V ES A S T R AI G HT A NS W E R "What If It Doesn't Work?" Accountability Is Built Into the Project We will measure
The 2025 speed survey is the before-picture: 85th-percentile speeds, volumes, and five years of collision records, segment by segment. Post-construction counts and the next Engineering & Traffic Survey will show, publicly, whether speeds and injuries moved the right way.

We must report
The Safe Streets Ordinance requires an annual report to the City Council evaluating changes to pedestrian, bicyclist, and vehicular traffic, including any negative effects on surrounding streets. That review is codified law, not a promise.

Foothill is adjustable
On Foothill, the reconfiguration is delivered mainly through striping and removable buffers and signing with localized pavement work, not a full rebuild. If monitoring shows a segment needs tuning (signal timing, turn pockets, lane transitions), it can be adjusted at modest cost. Further grant funding could also be pursued to make certain features more permanent in nature, while enhancing beautification efforts.

You stay in the loop
Demonstrations, surveys, and this review shaped the design; construction notices, a project webpage, and the annual Safe Streets workshop keep residents in the conversation after the ribbon is cut.

Under CVC 22358.8 (AB 43), the City may also retain the 35 mph limits at the next survey even while driver speeds adjust — the law now lets safety, not just prevailing speed, set the limit.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 28

T H A NK Y O U F O R S H O WI N G U P F O R Y O UR S T RE E T Tell Us What You Think – Feedback to the City Council
Comment Today
Fill out a comment card at the sign-in table, or talk with Public Works staff at these boards. Every card is logged and summarized for the City Council.

Review the Plans
The complete 100% plan set (dated July 8, 2026), renderings, and this Q&A handout are available at City Hall, on the project page at
www.CityOfGlendora.gov/CapitalProjects, and www.EngageGlendora.org Attend the Hearing
The plans return to the City Council this fall. Agendas are posted at www.cityofglendora.gov; comment in person, in writing, or by email to the City Clerk.

Stay Informed
Sign up for project updates through the City website and follow @cityofglendora — construction notices, detours, and milestones will be posted throughout.

City of Glendora Public Works · 116 E. Foothill Blvd., Glendora, CA 91741 · (626) 914-8200 · cityofglendora.gov GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C OMM UN ITY RE V IE W ST ORY B OA R DS BO ARD 29

UPDATE ON THE GLENDORA PEOPLE MOVEMENT PROJECT AND

REVIEW OF FIRST LAST MILE
100% DESIGN PLAN

PUBLIC WORKS

GLENDORA CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 22, 2026

VALERIE VELASQUEZ-SANTOYA, ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

R E CO M M EN D A T IO N
That the City Council Take Four Actions Tonight
Staff recommends approval of the 100% design plans, including any refinements.

RECEIVE
A presentation on the additional
community outreach conducted
following the August 25, 2026
City Council meeting.

APPROVE
The 100% design plans, dated
July 8, 2026, finding them
reasonable and consistent with
design standards under
Gov. Code §830.6.

DIRECT
Staff to incorporate any Councildirected refinements into the approved plans. A refinement that
is a material modification returns to
Council with updated plans before
construction.

AUTHORIZE
The City Engineer to approve
minor, non-material, administrative,
technical, or field revisions that do
not alter the project’s scope,
character, function, or design.

Any material modification returns to Council for review and approval before construction. Any change requiring added appropriations also returns to Council for budget action.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 2 / 12

E X E CU T I V E S U MM A RY
Where Things Stand Tonight, September 22, 2026
Project Scope
The 100% First/Last Mile plans cover Glendora Ave from Route 66 to Foothill Blvd, and Foothill Blvd from Citrus Ave to Vista Bonita Ave.

Design Status
The 100% design plans are complete and dated July 8, 2026, including protected bike facilities, ADA improvements, a roundabout at Glendora Ave and Ada Ave, and restored antique streetlights.

Outreach Since August 25
Staff published Engage Glendora, briefed the Business
Improvement District Advisory Board, and held a Community Open House, gathering 54 written and online responses.

Federal Funding Deadline
The $5 million federal earmark required obligation by
September 30, 2026. Caltrans issued the construction
Authorization to Proceed (E76) on August 27, 2026,
meeting that deadline.

Tonight’s Request
Staff asks the Council to approve the 100% plans with any Council-directed refinements, direct staff to incorporate those refinements (returning to Council if any is a material
modification), and authorize the City Engineer to approve minor, non-material revisions.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 3 / 12

A D DI T IO N A L C O MM U NI T Y E N G AG E M E NT
Since the August 25 Meeting, Staff Expanded the Conversation and Documented Every Response
Sept 2
Engage Glendora project page
published — storyboards,
plans, and answers to 50+
anticipated questions
Sept 3
Business Improvement District
Advisory Board briefed on the
plans; Board took no position
Sept 10
Community Open House
storyboards, aerial exhibits,
and staff on hand to
answer questions
54 total written and online
responses received
20 handwritten comment cards
collected at the Open House
www.EngageGlendora.org · BID Advisory Board Briefing · Community Open House · Comment Cards · Online Survey GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 4 / 12 The pattern holds across years: in the 2021 Glendora Ave demonstration, 55% said safer streets would encourage them to walk or bike more, and 59% would consider using the Metro station. This year’s Open House cited safer crossings (16), protected bi ke lanes (14), streetscape/lighting (10), and slower speeds (10) as top successes.

The recurring concerns: traffic flow, large-vehicle turning, and landscaping, are addressed in the design refinements Council may direct staff to evaluate, covered next.

W HA T WE H E A R D, A N D H O W T HE DE S I G N RE S P O N DS The Five Themes in Community Input,
and How Staff Proposes to Address Them
Traffic & Lane Reductions
(Most frequently raised)
Congestion concerns focus on Foothill near Citrus
College during school arrival/dismissal, queuing, merges, and cut-through traffic.

Slowing speeds is an intended outcome of the design,
not a byproduct.

The design keeps through travel and dedicated turn
lanes at key intersections; staff will monitor operations after construction and can adjust.

Roundabout & Large-Vehicle Turning
(Buses, fire apparatus, trucks, trailers)
Concern centers on turning paths and driver error for
buses, fire apparatus, trucks, RVs, and vehicles towing trailers.

The single-lane roundabout already includes a
mountable center apron for trucks and fire engines.

Staff will add clear education, signing, and markings, and confirm truck-turn accommodation.

Landscaping & Appearance
(Frequently requested)
Support for Village-style improvements, with requests for more trees and shade, durable materials, lower-impact
lighting, attractive signal equipment, and a clear
maintenance plan.

Some are concerned that landscaping shown in concepts
will not be delivered; Council may direct staff to estimate installation and ongoing maintenance costs.

Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities
(Broadly supported)
Support for protected bicycle lanes and safer crossings, with requests to extend bicycle connections beyond the
current project limits and questions about the number of expected users.

Other Location-Specific Matters
(Also raised)
Parking, Foothill pavement, cut-through traffic,
construction impacts, funding versus street repairs,
access to the A Line, and homelessness and safety,
including some locations beyond the First/Last Mile
project limits.

Post Office Left-Turn & Queuing
(Ada Ave)
A frequently cited specific concern: whether the left-turn exit from the post office parking lot can be safely
retained, and whether queues on Ada Ave could extend
to and from Vermont Ave, addressed as a design
refinement next.

None of these evaluations would, by itself, authorize a change to the plans. Staff would document cost and funding implications and return to Council before incorporating any material modification.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 5 / 12

P O T E NT I A L D E S IG N R E F IN E ME N T S
Recurring Themes for Additional Staff Review,
as Directed by the Council
Left-Turn Exit at the Post Office
Evaluate whether the left-turn exit from the post office parking lot (south to east) can be safely retained, including the potential for queues on Ada Ave extending to and from Vermont Ave.

Reversible Medians on Foothill
Evaluate whether permanent medians at specific delivery locations could limit maneuvering space for commercial
deliveries or constrained driveways; where a conflict exists, relocate the median or use striping or another reversible treatment initially.

Large-Vehicle Turning Analysis
Existing analysis already covers an SU-30 delivery vehicle, a Fire Department pumper, and a 40-foot bus. Staff will add a 21- foot truck towing a 30-foot trailer to accommodate essential and emergency vehicles while preserving low-speed, pedestrianoriented Village conditions.

Post Office & Business Access
Turning movements at the Post Office and other driveways were reviewed in design; every property keeps vehicle access, organized through turn lanes and the two-way left-turn lane.

Additional Landscaping Costs
Estimate installation, irrigation, and ongoing maintenance costs of landscaping beyond the 100% plans, and identify funding.

How Refinements Are Approved
Staff will incorporate City Council directed refinements into the approved plans. A refinement that materially modifies the design returns to Council for review; one requiring added appropriations also returns for budget action.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 6 / 12

W HY T HE D ES I G N R ED U C E S S P E ED
This Is Not About Creating Congestion —
It’s About Predictable, Safer Movement
The City’s 2022 Local Road Safety Plan analyzed reported collisions from 2016–2020 using the Federal Highway Administration’s methodology, weighting collisions by severity (EPDO). Foothill Boulevard ranked at the top of the list:
#1 HIGHEST-INJURY INTERSECTION

IN THE CITY
Foothill Blvd & Barranca Ave — 36 reported crashes
during the study period.
#9 HIGHEST-INJURY CORRIDOR,
TOP 10 CITYWIDE
Foothill Blvd, Citrus Ave to Grand Ave — 91 reported
crashes, including 28 associated with unsafe speed.

The design: reduces excessive speeds, gives drivers more time to react to turning vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists, improves visibility, and makes it easier to turn into local businesses while maintaining through travel and dedicated turn lanes where they’re needed most.

Local Road Safety Plan → Highest-injury findings → 2025 Speed Survey → 35 mph corridor → First/Last Mile Design GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 7 / 12

T R A F F IC V O L U ME S SU P P O R T T H E D E S IG N The Corridor’s Busiest Segment Is Well Within Road-Diet Range 0 2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Citrus–
Barranca
Barranca–
Grand
Grand–
Glendora
Glendora–
Cullen
Cullen–
Loraine
Loraine–
Valley Ctr
Valley Ctr–
Lone Hill
Lone Hill–
Amelia
Average daily traffic by segment (vehicles/day)
2017 daily traffic 2025 daily traffic
14,424
vehicles per day, the highest 2025 volume on the Grand Ave to Glendora Ave segment (within the project limits). Corridor-wide, traffic is about 4.9% lower than in 2017 across eight comparable segments. 15,404
vehicles per day already carried today outside the project limits at the Valley Center to Lone Hill segment, about 1,000 more than the busiest project segment, on just one lane each way.
20,000
vehicles per day, the volume level the Federal Highway
Administration identifies as a point where road-diet projects are good candidates for feasibility evaluation. The project’s highest count sits well below it.

Counts: 2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey, single-day machine counts by segment.

Source: City of Glendora 2025 Citywide Engineering & Traffic Survey; FHWA road-diet feasibility guidance.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 8 / 12 Segment Volumes (2025 avg.) Vehicles/Day
Project Segment 14,424
Valley Center to Lone Hill
(outside project limit)
15,404

F U N DI NG & F E D E RA L A U T H O RI Z A T IO N
The $5 Million Federal Earmark Was Obligated
Ahead of the September 30 Deadline
$5 Million Federal Earmark — Obligated
Awarded as a federal fiscal year 2023 Congressional earmark, the funds had to be obligated by September 30, 2026. Caltrans issued the construction-phase Authorization to Proceed (E76) on August 27, 2026, obligating the funds before the deadline.

Obligation commits the funds to the project; it does not mean a contract has been awarded.
$7.16 Million Engineer’s Estimate
The July 13, 2026 estimate for the Glendora Ave and Foothill Blvd improvements, including a 10% contingency. The $5 million federal earmark is obligated toward it; actual construction cost will be set through competitive bidding.

Why Plans Came One Month Before the Deadline
As is typical during design, plans continued to be refined to confirm compliance with engineering, roadway-design, accessibility, and traffic-control requirements, including MUTCD standards — while costs and available funding became clearer. SGVCOG then secured additional funds and reallocated dollars between the Little Dalton Wash Trail and First/Last Mile, closing the funding gap and keeping both streets in one construction contract.

Council-Directed Changes Carry Risk
Minor refinements consistent with the approved design and federal authorization may be incorporated as the project advances, but added cost from Council-requested changes is the City’s responsibility under the MOA and may require an appropriation. A change outside the authorized scope, or one that misses delivery deadlines, could require reengaging Caltrans and could delay the project or jeopardize some or all of the $5 million in obligated federal funds.

Tonight’s action concerns discretionary approval of the completed design; federal obligation was already secured through the separate Caltrans authorization process.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 9 / 12

N E X T S T E P S
What Happens After Tonight’s Decision
TONIGHT Council Decision
City Council considers approval of the 100% plans and
the Government Code §830.6 design finding.
1 Construction Management
Procurement
SGVCOG procures construction management services
under the Memorandum of Agreement with the City.
2 Advertise & Bid
Competitive construction bidding, which will set the
actual construction price.
3 Contract Award
Award must occur within six months of the August 2026
federal authorization, anticipated by late February 2027. 4 Build With Communication
Construction, reimbursement, and closeout follow; staff coordinates with businesses, residents, utilities, Metro, and emergency responders throughout.
5 Measure & Report
Post-opening traffic and speed monitoring;
the Safe Streets annual report to Council;
the next Engineering & Traffic Survey verifies results.

Any refinements the Council directs tonight will be evaluated for design, schedule, and cost impacts and returned to Council before being incorporated.

Additional City-requested costs require a City appropriation under the MOA with SGVCOG.

GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 10 / 12

T H A NK Y O U F O R Y O U R C O NT I N UE D E N G A GE M E N T Stay Informed
Updates, plan sheets, and answers to community
questions remain available at:
www.EngageGlendora.org/PeopleMovement
City of Glendora Public Works · 116 E. Foothill Blvd., Glendora, CA 91741 · (626) 914-8200 · cityofglendora.gov GL E NDOR A P E OP LE MOV E M E NT · FOOT HIL L B OU LE V A RD & GL E ND ORA A V E NU E FI RS T/ LA S T MI LE · C ITY COU NCI L M EE TI NG 11 / 12

1. Receive a presentation on the additional community outreach conducted following the August 25, 2026 City Council meeting;

2. Approve the 100% design plans for the Glendora Ave and Foothill Blvd First/Last Mile Improvements, dated July 8, 2026, including any refinements specifically identified and directed by the City Council, and find that the plans are reasonable and consistent with applicable design standards for purposes of Government Code Section 830.6;

3. Direct staff to incorporate any refinements identified by the City Council into the approved design plans. If staff determines that a Council-directed refinement would constitute a material modification to the approved design, staff shall return to the City Council with updated plans for review and approval prior to construction of the affected improvement. Any modification requiring an increase in project appropriations shall also return to the City Council for the necessary budget action; and

4. Authorize the City Engineer to approve minor, non-material, administrative, technical, or field revisions that are consistent with the City Council-approved design and do not materially alter the scope, character, function, or design of the project. Any proposed material modification to the City Council-approved design shall be returned to the City Council for review and approval prior to construction of the affected improvement.

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:

STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: September 22, 2026
FROM: Public Works DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Consider a Public Works Agreement with Aquatrax, LLC for the Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System in an amount not to exceed $100,724 during the initial term of the Agreement (QuestCDN # 10047360)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Award an Agreement for Contract Services to Aquatrax, LLC for the Water Customer Portal and Notification System, effective from the date of mutual execution for an initial period of three (3) years, with the option to renew on an annual basis for up to two (2) additional one year periods, for a total contract term not to exceed five (5) years, in an amount not to exceed $100,724 for the initial three year period, and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and any subsequent renewals.

STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 4 - Sustainable Infrastructure
Goal 5 - Staff + Technology

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Glendora's Public Works Water Division operates an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system using Sensus smart meter technology, originally installed beginning in 2015, that serves approximately 13,500 water meters throughout the City. The AMI system relies on an analytics software platform provided by Sensus that provides digital meter reading, customer consumption data compilation, billing data creation, and customer-facing portal services. Sensus is sunsetting the current customer facing portal (Sensus Analytics), requiring the City's transition to a new water customer portal solution to ensure continued, uninterrupted service to Glendora water customers.

The RFP for a Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System (QuestCDN #10047360) was released on February 12, 2026, and proposals were due on March 12, 2026; the City received seven proposals. Based on the evaluation criteria established in the RFP, staff selected three vendors for interviews. After a thorough evaluation process, including proposal scoring, interviews, and reference checks, staff determined Aquatrax's proposal demonstrated the strongest overall alignment with the City's operational goals, customer engagement priorities, and analytics needs. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council award an agreement to Aquatrax, effective from the date of mutual execution for an initial period of three (3) years, with the option to renew on an annual basis for up to two (2) additional one-year periods, for a total contract term not to exceed five (5) years, at a cost not to exceed $100,724 for the initial three-year term.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
The Glendora Municipal Code (GMC) § 2.40.080 requires a formal procurement procedure for acquiring services when the estimated expenditure is expected to exceed $50,000. The City released the RFP for a Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System (QuestCDN #10047360) on February 12, 2026, and opened proposals on March 12, 2026.

DISCUSSION
The City of Glendora Public Works Water Division provides water service and maintains the AMI system for approximately 13,500 water meters throughout the City. The Public Works Department regularly issues RFPs to ensure vendor services remain competitive. Because Sensus is sunsetting the current customer facing portal, staff determined it would be necessary to transition to a modern, cloud-based water customer portal solution to ensure continued, uninterrupted service to Glendora water customers.

The RFP for a Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System (QuestCDN #10047360) was released on February 12, 2026, with proposals due on March 12, 2026. The solicitation received seven proposals. Based on the evaluation criteria and scoring established in the RFP, three vendors were shortlisted and invited to participate in interviews. The evaluation criteria included approach to work and qualifications (20%), record of performance and references (20%), fee schedule (50%), and interview performance (10%).

The three vendors evaluated were Yoppify, Vertexone, and Aquatrax. The following summarizes the results of the evaluation:

Vendor
Three-Year
Cost
Total
Score
Yoppify $173,885.00 75
Vertexone $87,017.60 86
Aquatrax $100,724.00 88
Aquatrax achieved the highest overall evaluation score of 88 and demonstrated strong alignment with the City's goals, customer engagement priorities, and analytics needs. The team presented a clear phased implementation plan with an estimated timeline of 8–10 weeks, along with multiple relevant California utility references and demonstrated experience with system integrations. The pricing was competitive and included a transparent cost breakdown, which provided added confidence in the overall proposal. During the interview process, the Aquatrax team performed strongly by providing clear, knowledgeable, and well-prepared responses to questions. A reference check with Laguna Beach County Water District yielded very positive feedback regarding the program, its implementation process, and the professionalism and responsiveness of the staff.

Although Vertexone offered a lower three-year cost of $87,017.60, Aquatrax achieved the highest overall evaluation score and demonstrated greater alignment with the City's operational goals. Aquatrax's proposal reflected a stronger implementation framework, valuable reporting modules, and a clear understanding of future utility requirements. The City has determined that Aquatrax represents the best overall value, not simply the lowest cost, and its combination of competitive pricing, implementation readiness, system capabilities, and proven performance positions the City of Glendora for long-term success and improved customer service.

Aquatrax is a cloud based water intelligence platform that consolidates the data the City already collects, including AMI meter reads, billing and customer information, and geographic information system data, into a single system, rather than replacing the City's existing infrastructure. For Glendora water customers, the new system will represent an upgrade over the current Sensus Analytics portal. Customers will have access to a self service portal and companion mobile app where they can view their water usage in near real time, broken down by hour, day, week, month, or billing cycle, rather than waiting for a paper bill to understand their consumption. The system also includes automated leak alerts, notifying customers when it detects unusual or continuous water use, such as a running toilet or a stuck irrigation valve, often before it results in an unexpectedly high bill. Unlike the current Sensus Analytics portal, which only allows customers to check this information from a desktop computer, Aquatrax's mobile app will let customers view and check leak alerts directly from their phone, giving them the ability to catch and respond to a potential leak while away from home. Additional customer facing features include water use comparison and budgeting tools that help customers see how their consumption compares to their own history or to similar households, and integration with rebate and conservation program tracking so customers can view relevant incentives directly through the platform.

For City staff, Aquatrax offers consolidated dashboards covering water loss, leak detection, and consumption analytics that currently must be assembled manually across separate meter, billing, and mapping systems. The platform also supports state mandated water loss auditing and conservation compliance reporting on an ongoing basis, reducing the effort required to compile this information at reporting deadlines. Together, these capabilities are expected to improve the customer experience, strengthen the City's water loss and conservation reporting capacity, and reduce staff time spent on manual data compilation and customer outreach.

Therefore, staff recommends the City Council award an agreement to Aquatrax, effective from the date of mutual execution for an initial period of three (3) years, with the option to renew on an annual basis for up to two (2) additional one-year periods, for a total contract term not to exceed five (5) years, at a cost not to exceed $100,724 for the initial three-year term.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City's FY 2026-27 Adopted Mid-Cycle Budget includes sufficient appropriations in the Water Operations Fund 501 Customer Service Division for the Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System. The annual expenditures are outlined in the table below:

Annual Expenditures Account Number Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Implementation Fee 50170610.59100 $23,500.00 $ - $ -
Annual Software as a Service (Saas) Fee 50170610.59100 $23,184.00 $23,879.52 $24,595.91 Annual Cloud Hosting Fee 50170610.59100 $1,800.00 $1,854.00 $1,909.62 Total $48,484.00 $25,733.52 $26,505.53
3 Year Cost $100,723.05

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
There are no CEQA impacts associated with the recommendations in this report.

Prepared By: Armando De Jesus, Management Analyst
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Paul Zampiello, Assistant Public Works Director Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Not Applicable
Attachments
A_RFP_No_10047360.pdf
B_Aquatrax_Proposal.pdf
C_Agreement.pdf
D_Water_Customer_Portal_Presentation.pdf

NOTICE OF

REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Glendora, County of Los Angeles, California (hereinafter "City") will receive Proposals ONLY via the online electronic bid service, www.questcdn.com, until 10:00 a.m. on the Thursday 12th day of March 2026 for:

Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System
QuestCDN # 10047360
NO PROPOSALS WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER THIS DATE AND TIME! NO ORAL, FACSIMILE OR TELEPHONIC PROPOSALS WILL BE CONSIDERED.

Each Proposal must conform and be responsive to all requirements set forth in the RFP. Consultants will need to register with the provider of this service, Quest Construction Data Network. RFP documents can be downloaded electronically for no cost by providing Quest CDN Project Number #10047360 on the Request Search Page on the Quest website www.questcdn.com. You can contact QuestCDN at 952-233-1632 or [email protected] for assistance in membership registration and downloading this digital project information. Any questions regarding the RFP should be submitted utilizing QuestCDN’s Q&A section.

The City of Glendora reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any informalities in any proposal and select the one that best meets the City’s needs.

Kathleen R. Sessman, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
City of Glendora
Publish in San Gabriel Valley Examiner: February 12, 2026 Account number: 50170600.59100
Cover Letter
Date: 21 March 2026
Paul Zampiello
Assistant Public Works Director
Glendora, CA 91741
Subject: Proposal Submission – Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System Dear Mr. Zampiello and Mr. De Jesus,
AquaTrax LLC is pleased to submit our proposal in response to the City of Glendora’s Request for Proposals for a Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System. We appreciate the opportunity to support the City’s vision of delivering a modern, secure, and highly engaging platform that enhances customer communication, improves leak detection and response, and enables data-driven operational efficiency.

AquaTrax is a mobile-first, cloud-based analytics and customer engagement platform purpose-built for public water utilities. As one of the first platforms in the industry designed with a mobile-first architecture alongside a fully integrated web portal, AquaTrax enables customers and staff to securely access information anytime, from any device.

Our solution is fully vendor-agnostic, operating seamlessly alongside existing systems without replacing the City’s authoritative systems of record for billing, metering, or payments.

We bring proven experience in integrating with leading utility technologies, including:
• Xylem/Sensus AMI systems (Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Laguna Beach, La Marque) • Tyler Technologies billing and payment systems (Morgan Hill, Gilroy) This experience ensures a low-risk, non-disruptive implementation aligned with the City’s existing infrastructure.

Our proposed solution directly aligns with the City of Glendora’s objectives by delivering:
• City-Branded Customer Portal & Mobile App: Fully customizable dashboards presenting water usage, billing context, alerts, and conservation insights, tailored to Glendora’s branding and customer engagement goals. • Advanced Leak Detection & Automated Workflows: Real-time AMI data ingestion, leak severity classification, automated notifications, and auto-resolution tracking with detailed leak timelines, helping utilities significantly reduce water loss.
• Multi-Channel Communication Platform: Integrated SMS, email, web chat, and push notifications with targeted messaging capabilities (geo, account, and segment-based) to maximize customer reach and response. • Flexible Integration Architecture: Support for API, SFTP, and iFrame-based integrations, enabling seamless connectivity with AMI, billing, and third-party systems while maintaining operational continuity. • Data Quality & Security: Built-in validation for customer contact data, automated reporting, and a secure, cloudhosted environment with continuous monitoring and compliance-ready architecture. • Analytics & Customer Engagement Insights: Advanced reporting and a dedicated module tracking customer behavior, portal usage, and program effectiveness, enabling data-driven decision-making. • Implementation, Training & Ongoing Support: A structured deployment approach with configuration, onboarding, staff training, and continuous optimization support.

Additionally, AquaTrax enhances customer adoption and conservation outcomes through proactive outreach campaigns and gamification capabilities, driving measurable engagement and participation.

AquaTrax offers a scalable, future-ready platform that empowers the City of Glendora to improve customer experience, streamline operations, and proactively manage water usage and conservation initiatives—while maintaining full flexibility to integrate with evolving technologies.

Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to the opportunity to partner with the City of Glendora to deliver a secure, intelligent, and customer-focused water engagement platform.

Sincerely,
Amit Sharma,
Founder and CEO
Address: 2372 Morse Avenue, Ste 647, Irvine, CA 92614
Website: www.aquatraxsolutions.com
Email: [email protected] ,
Phone: 949-929-2607
Table of Contents
RFP 10047360- Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System Contents

1. Executive Summary.....................................................................................................2

2. RFP Requirements and AquaTrax Alignment..............................................................3

3. System Integrations.....................................................................................................3

4. Project Management ...................................................................................................3

5. Security & Compliance ................................................................................................4

6. Current Product ...........................................................................................................5

7. Conclusion.................................................................................................................11

1. Executive Summary
➢ Introduction
The City of Glendora is seeking a modern Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System that enhances customer engagement, improves transparency around water usage, and enables proactive communication—while integrating seamlessly with existing enterprise systems.

AquaTrax LLC proposes a mobile-first, cloud-based customer engagement and analytics platform purpose-built for public water utilities. AquaTrax is a vendor-agnostic solution, designed to integrate with existing AMI, billing, and communication systems without replacing systems of record.

The platform has proven integration experience with:
• Xylem/Sensus AMI systems (Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Laguna Beach, La Marque) • Tyler Technologies billing/payment systems (Morgan Hill, Gilroy) AquaTrax aligns with Glendora’s objectives by delivering a fully city-branded portal and mobile application, supporting customer self-service, leak detection workflows, and multi-channel communication in a secure and scalable environment.

AquaTrax specializes in delivering utility-focused customer portals, analytics platforms, and communication systems that unify water usage, alerts, and customer engagement into a single intuitive experience. As a mobile-first platform (one of the first in the industry), AquaTrax ensures seamless usability across mobile, tablet, and desktop devices, driving higher adoption and engagement. Key capabilities include a fully city-branded portal and mobile app with customizable dashboards, flexible login options (passwordless, OTP, link-based, or traditional), AMI data ingestion with real-time updates via API/SFTP, interval and historical usage visualization, advanced leak detection with severity classification and automated workflows, auto-resolution of leaks with detailed start/end tracking, and multi-channel communication (SMS, Email, Web, Push Notifications) with advanced geo, account, and segment-based targeting.

The platform also includes data validation tools (email/phone/address), a secure cloud-based architecture with continuous monitoring, and non-invasive integration (API, SFTP, iFrame), all within a modular and scalable framework. AquaTrax has a strong track record partnering with utilities such as Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Laguna Beach, Irvine Ranch Water District, Newport Beach, American Canyon, Cedar Hills, and La Marque, demonstrating its ability to integrate with diverse AMI and billing ecosystems (including Xylem and Tyler), deliver secure and scalable solutions, support large customer bases, and maintain data governance and compliance. The platform provides a comprehensive solution aligned with City requirements, including customizable dashboards, leak detection and workflow automation, multichannel communication, flexible data integration, and enterprise-grade security, along with structured onboarding, training, and ongoing support. AquaTrax further enhances operations through advanced analytics and AI-driven insights, enabling early detection of abnormal usage, customer behavior tracking, campaign management, gamification for increased engagement, and automated workflows that reduce staff effort. Hosted in a secure, enterprise-grade cloud environment, AquaTrax ensures high availability, scalability, end-to-end encryption, continuous monitoring, automated updates, and disaster recovery readiness, while minimizing IT overhead and providing a future-ready platform for long-term operational efficiency and customer engagement. ➢ Outcome for City of Glendora
Implementing AquaTrax will provide the City with a modern, mobile-first, and fully integrated platform that:
• Enhances customer experience through intuitive self-service tools • Improves transparency in water usage and alerts
• Enables proactive leak detection and faster resolution • Supports multi-channel communication and targeted outreach • Increases operational visibility and staff efficiency • Ensures seamless integration with existing systems (AMI, billing, payment) • Positions the City for future digital transformation and conservation initiatives

2. RFP Requirements and AquaTrax Alignment
AquaTrax delivers a mobile-first, cloud-based Water Customer Web Portal and Notification System built on a vendoragnostic architecture that integrates seamlessly with existing AMI, billing, and communication systems without replacing systems of record. With proven integrations including Xylem/Sensus AMI (Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Laguna Beach, La Marque) and Tyler Technologies (Morgan Hill, Gilroy), the platform enhances customer engagement, leak response, and operational efficiency through a scalable solution. AquaTrax provides a fully city-branded, customizable portal and mobile application offering secure access to account information, real-time and historical water usage, billing summaries, alerts, and communications, supported by flexible login options such as passwordless, OTP, and link-based access.

Interactive dashboards present interval and historical consumption trends, enabling intuitive visualization and early detection of abnormal usage. The platform includes advanced leak detection and workflow automation, leveraging AMI data ingestion for real-time or batch processing, automated anomaly detection, severity classification, and auto-resolution of leak cases with detailed activity tracking. AquaTrax also enables multi-channel communication through SMS, email, web chat, and push notifications, with optional voice and print integrations, along with advanced targeting by geography, account, and customer segments, and real-time tracking of message delivery and engagement. Administrative tools provide centralized dashboards for customer management, usage monitoring, communication tracking, reporting, and data export, offering full visibility into customer behavior and supporting data-driven decision-making. The platform ensures flexible integration via API, SFTP, and iFrame, while preserving existing workflows, business rules, and data governance. It incorporates enterprise-grade security, including encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access control, audit logging, secure authentication, and continuous monitoring within a high-availability cloud environment. Built on a cloud-native, modular architecture, AquaTrax supports scalability and future enhancements, with a structured implementation approach including configuration, data onboarding, staff training, and documentation, along with ongoing technical support, system monitoring, and optimization to ensure smooth deployment and long-term reliability.

3. System Integrations
AquaTrax is designed as a vendor-agnostic, cloud-based platform that integrates seamlessly with existing AMI, billing, and communication systems, creating a unified and data-driven environment without replacing systems of record. The platform securely ingests, validates, and analyzes data to deliver actionable insights through a centralized customer portal and administrative interface. AquaTrax has proven integration experience with Xylem/Sensus AMI systems (Morgan Hill, Gilroy, Laguna Beach, La Marque) and Tyler Technologies billing/payment systems (Morgan Hill, Gilroy), ensuring a low-risk, non-disruptive implementation aligned with utility environments. ➢ Key Integration Areas
• AMI / Metering Systems (e.g., Xylem/Sensus):

Ingestion of interval consumption data for usage analytics, leak detection, and alerts • Billing / CIS Systems (e.g., Tyler Technologies):

Synchronization of customer account, service, and billing data for portal visibility (no bill calculation or account creation)
• Payment Platforms:

Secure redirection or embedded access to external payment systems; AquaTrax does not process payments or store PCI data
• Communication Systems (e.g., SMS/Email platforms):

Integration for multi-channel messaging including alerts and customer notifications • CRM / Customer Service Systems:

Provides usage and engagement context to support customer inquiries without replacing CRM workflows

4. Project Management
AquaTrax proposes an 8–10 week implementation timeline, followed by a stabilization and support phase. The final schedule will be aligned with the City’s scope, integration requirements, and availability of AMI and billing data. The project will follow a milestone-based approach to ensure a controlled, transparent, and low-risk deployment. ➢ Implementation Approach
AquaTrax utilizes a structured, phased methodology:
• Initiation & Planning (1–2 Weeks):

Project kickoff, scope confirmation, stakeholder alignment, and integration planning • Configuration & Integration (2 Weeks):

Platform setup, security configuration, role-based access, and integration with AMI and billing systems (e.g., Xylem, Tyler)
• Testing & Validation (2 Weeks):

Internal QA testing and User Acceptance Testing (UAT) with City staff to validate data accuracy, dashboards, alerts, and workflows
• Deployment & Go-Live (1 Week):

Production deployment, activation of portal, dashboards, alerts, and system verification • Training & Knowledge Transfer (1 Week):

Staff training sessions, documentation, and recorded materials • Stabilization & Support (2–4 Weeks):

Post-deployment monitoring, issue resolution, and transition to ongoing support ➢ Key Deliverables
AquaTrax provides:
• Project kickoff and implementation plan
• Configured customer portal and administrative dashboards • Integrated data pipelines (AMI, billing, communication systems) • Tested and validated system (QA + UAT support)
• Training materials, documentation, and recorded sessions • Post-go-live support and performance monitoring
The City provides:
• Access to required data (usage, billing, communication systems) • Participation in testing (UAT) and training
• Approval for deployment and operational readiness
➢ Project Governance
• Milestone-based execution with defined deliverables and acceptance criteria • Regular progress updates and coordination with City stakeholders • Focus on minimizing operational disruption and ensuring data accuracy • Proven implementation framework reducing risk and accelerating deployment

5. Security & Compliance
AquaTrax delivers a secure, reliable, and fully supported platform through a structured approach encompassing system testing, staff training, ongoing support, and enterprise-grade security to ensure high performance, data protection, and longterm operational success for the City. The solution includes comprehensive system testing and validation, covering functional testing of all modules and integrations (AMI, billing, communication systems), performance and load testing for stability, security and vulnerability assessments aligned with public-sector standards, and User Acceptance Testing (UAT) with City staff to validate data accuracy, usage visibility, alerts, reporting, and overall usability. AquaTrax provides extensive training and enablement, including tailored training programs for administrators, customer service, and IT teams, supported by customized documentation, recorded videos, and in-application guidance, with optional remote or on-site sessions for advanced users. Ongoing support and maintenance is delivered through multi-channel support (phone, email, ticketing system), a dedicated account manager, SLA-based response times, and regular platform updates for enhancements, fixes, and security improvements, ensuring continuous optimization. The platform follows enterprise-grade security and compliance practices, including secure authentication with strong password policies, MFA, and session management; data encryption using TLS (in transit) and AES-256 (at rest); comprehensive audit logging for user activity and system changes; and continuous monitoring with real-time anomaly detection, configurable alerts, and system health dashboards, ensuring full transparency, protection, and compliance.

6. Current Product
• Dashboard Module
The Customer Portal landing page serves as a consolidated dashboard providing high-level metrics and quick-access links:
• My Water Usage
o Displays current water consumption metrics and previous month’s usage for the current year.
• Billing Information
o Presents financial account data, including balance due and payment due date.
• Set Alerts & Notifications
o Enables configuration of threshold-based usage alerts. o Provides access to message notifications from the utility provider. • Water Usage Comparison
o Visualizes user-specific consumption compared to predefined benchmarks or efficiency targets set by the utility.
• My Account Address
o Displays the customer’s full-service address integrated with an embedded mapping component.
• Your Scheduled Watering Days
o Communicates utility-defined watering schedules to customers based on local regulations or policies.
• My Daily Average Use
o Provides analytical insights into percentage variance and average gallons per day across the preceding two billing periods.
• My Water Score
o Benchmarks the customer’s water usage relative to other customers with similar consumption profiles.
• Social Media Links
o Provides connectivity to official utility social media channels for customer engagement.
• Select Language
o Allows dynamic localization of the portal’s user interface for multilingual support
Track Usage Module
Accessible via the left navigation menu, the Track Usage module enables granular consumption analysis:
• Graphical Usage Visualization
o Interactive charts present usage data with dynamic filtering options:
▪ Time frames: hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, billing cycle. ▪ Visual distinction of consumption categories:
▪ Normal consumption
▪ Irrigation
▪ Leak events
o Leak detection indicators:
▪ Red = active leak condition.
▪ Green = no leak detected.
• Measurement Units
o Users can toggle data visualization between:
▪ Gallons (default)
▪ Cubic Feet (CF)
▪ Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF)
• Dynamic Chart Updates
o Visualization components update in real time based on applied filters and leak status changes. • Billing View Linkage
o Provides direct navigation from Track Usage charts to the billing cycle detail page. • Downloadable Reports
o Users may export usage data for custom timeframes in file formats such as CSV or PDF. • Usage Notification Configuration
o Users can:
▪ Select a specific meter.
▪ Define threshold limits on daily or monthly usage.
▪ Choose measurement units.
▪ The system triggers notifications if the defined limits are exceeded.

Connect with Utility Module
Located within the left navigation, this module provides bidirectional communication features:
• Report an Issue
o Allow customers to submit problem reports directly to utility staff.
• Comment History
o Displays a chronological log of interactions and
communications related to submitted issues.
o Includes utility contact information and associated
geographic map data for context.

Compare Water Use Module
Provides benchmarking and peer-comparison
analytics through graphical representations:
• My Comparison
o Enables users to evaluate current year
consumption against previous year’s data.
• Compare Neighbors
o Provides comparative analytics against
average consumption data for customers
within the same ZIP code.
• Compare with Everyone
o Offers benchmarking against average
usage among customers within the same
service segment or category.
• Composite View
o Aggregates all comparison modes into a
unified dashboard for holistic analysis
About My Property Module
• Accessible from the left navigation:
o Enables users to populate survey fields with property-specific details such as:
▪ Property attributes
▪ Irrigation system presence
▪ Usage patterns
• View and Pay Bill Module
(Applicable only if billing functionality is included in project scope.) • Account Information Display
o Meter number
o Account balance
o Billing period
o Due date
o Total water usage
• Payment Details View
o Breakdown of consumption charges and additional applicable fees. • Billing History
o Historical bill records, with filter capabilities for date range selection. o Data grid includes:
▪ Account number
▪ Bill date
▪ Due date
▪ Amount due
▪ Consumption data
o Download link for PDF bill document
Account Details Module
Located in the navigation panel, this module supports:
• Viewing and updating user profile attributes:
o Customer name
o Customer number
o Account name
o Account number
o Contact numbers (mobile, home, work)
o Email address
• Multi-account management:
o Users can link multiple service accounts under a single administrative profile. o Enables tenants and property owners to consolidate views and notification management across multiple properties.

AI Assistant
o Provides quick, accurate, step-by-step guidance for all system modules and features o Acts as an interactive help guide where users can type questions like:
▪ “How does the Track Usage module work?”
▪ “What is the functionality of the View and Pay Bill module?” o Especially helpful for:
▪ New users exploring the system
▪ Existing users learning new features
▪ Quick resolution of functionality-related questions without support tickets o Delivers real-time, context-aware responses to help users operate modules independently • Billing System Integration - AquaTrax supports Single Sign-On (SSO) from the existing online biller, embedded payment processing via secure iFrame, and bidirectional single sign-on between the customer portal and the billing system. Customers may access usage information directly from the billing portal and be automatically authenticated into AquaTrax, or initiate billing actions from within the AquaTrax portal without re-entering credentials. Where supported, payment functionality can be securely embedded within the AquaTrax interface, allowing customers to complete billing actions without navigating away. The billing system remains the authoritative system of record, while AquaTrax provides a seamless, integrated user experience.

Notifications
• Notification Details
Accessible via the left navigation menu, the Notifications interface enables users to:
o View historical notifications, including:
▪ Water usage reports
▪ Threshold breach alerts
▪ Utility service communications
o Utilize advanced features such as:
▪ Keyword-based search queries
▪ Category-based filtering
▪ Metadata display for each notification, including:
▪ Title
▪ Date timestamp
▪ Associated attachments
• Notification Preferences
Configurable under the “Settings” section:
o Users may enable or disable notifications for:
▪ Leak alerts (mandatory, cannot be disabled)
▪ Usage threshold notifications
▪ Periodic water reports (per billing cycle)
▪ Utility connects messages
▪ Account update communications
▪ Quiet Hours for suppressing service alerts during defined timeframes
Utility (Admin) Portal
• Aquatrax Dashboard
o Provide a dashboard displaying water consumption data sourced from:
▪ Billing systems (monthly data)
▪ AMI systems (hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly interval data) o Support selection of measurement units, including:
▪ Gallons
▪ Cubic Feet (CF)
▪ Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF)
o Delivers actionable insights on water supply, loss, and billing trends o Uses gauges, charts, and scatter plots to monitor efficiency and identify anomalies
o Enables deeper analysis of customer usage patterns and potential leaks o Facilitates compliance tracking and conservation planning through realtime data Customer Analytics, Management, and Mapping
• Present customer data through:
o Interactive charts segmented by customer type (e.g.,
residential, commercial)
o Searchable, filterable tables showing:
▪ Customer name
▪ Account number
▪ Meter information
▪ Customer segment
▪ Service and billing addresses
▪ Contact details
▪ Landscape area
▪ AMI status
• Enable:
o Column-level filtering and search
o Radio button selection for batch notifications
o Drill-down into individual customer details, including:
▪ Property and meter information
▪ Water usage (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly,
billing cycle)
▪ Units in Gallons, CF, or HCF
▪ Customer notes or comments
o “View as Customer” feature for admin preview
o Direct notification dispatch with communication
template previews
• Integrate geographic mapping to:
o Visualize service addresses and meter locations
o Draw polygons to select areas affected by leaks, high usage, or other events
o Identify customers in selected areas
o Send notifications directly from the map view
• Potential Leak Analytics
Provide analytics for potential water leaks, including:
o Dashboard and list views of leak events.
o Segmentation by customer type.
o Leak reporting data fields:
o Customer name, Account number, Leak type, Status, Segment, Meter details, Current usage, Service address, contact information, Usage date, Time to resolve (hours), Estimated water savings, total water lost, In-progress duration, Assigned caseworkers
o Enable:
▪ Data downloads in Excel, PDF, and CSV formats.
▪ Drill-down to customer-specific usage and leak activity timelines.
▪ Tracking of leak analytics KPIs and timeline progression of leak events.
▪ Access to communication history shows emails or
messages sent regarding leak alerts.
o Configurable leak detection logic.
• High Usage Analytics
o Provide dashboards and reports on high water usage events. o High usage details to include:
▪ Customer name, Account number, Issue subcategory,
Status
▪ Segment, Current and previous usage values, Meter size and number, High usage threshold configuration, Service address, Contact details, Usage date
o Enable:
▪ Data downloads in Excel, PDF, and CSV formats.
o Notification dispatch to customers from high-usage reports. o Include administrative configuration for high usage thresholds:
▪ Set values either as absolute consumption volumes or
percentage increases.
▪ Configure separately for each meter size and customer segment.
• Campaign Messaging & Insights
o Facilitate large-scale email campaigns with:
▪ Recipient list management via uploaded account files. ▪ Support for various message types:
▪ Registration
▪ Account updates
▪ Usage alerts
o Campaign Insights shall:
▪ Display graphical reports of campaign delivery metrics, including:
▪ Delivered
▪ Not delivered
▪ Completed
▪ Allow filtering by campaign category.
▪ Enable data export in PDF, image, or CSV formats.
• User Behavior & Utilization Analysis
o Provide analytics for user behavior within the customer portal, including:
▪ Active users
▪ Active meters
▪ High usage incidents over the past 7 days
▪ Potential leak occurrences
o Display utilization of individual modules with:
▪ Monthly and yearly filtering
▪ Graphical visualizations
▪ Export capabilities in PDF, image, or CSV formats
• Water Loss Analytics
o Year-Round Insights
o Trend Analysis
o Dynamic Charts
o Multiple Unit
o Regulatory Support
• Reporting and Data Exports
o Allow export of reports and analytics in common formats, including:
o Excel
o PDF
o CSV
o Image formats for charts
o Provide high performance for large data sets to ensure timely report generation
o As per client preference; list of reports.
• Issue Resolution and Quality Assurance
Aquatrax product provides inbuilt issue reporting and resolution system. CITY staff will get access to it. AquaTrax will provide the SLA for the issue resolution and any urgent/hot fix can be delivered within 24 hours. AquaTrax follows Azure Dev ops pipeline for deployments which are Agile and bi-weekly release cycle

7. Pricing

8. Conclusion
AquaTrax brings decades of combined experience delivering secure, scalable, and user-friendly digital solutions for publicsector water utilities. We are prepared to provide the Town of Cary with a reliable, cloud-based Utility Billing Customer Portal that integrates seamlessly with the Town’s existing billing, customer, and communication systems. The AquaTrax platform equips staff with actionable insights, usage analytics, and operational visibility while delivering a modern, intuitive experience for customers.

Through a proven, phased implementation approach and ongoing support model, AquaTrax is committed to delivering longterm value, operational efficiency, and a future-ready digital engagement platform that evolves with the Town’s needs.

We appreciate your consideration and look forward to the opportunity to partner with the Town of Cary to successfully implement a secure, customer-focused Utility Billing Customer Portal solution.

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
By and Between

CITY OF GLENDORA
and

AQUATRAX LLC
Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 1

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF GLENDORA AND

AQUATRAX LLC
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of __________, 2026 by and between the City of Glendora, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Aquatrax LLC, a California limited liability company (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.

C. Pursuant to the City of Glendora’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 2

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

The Scope of Services shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.

1.4 California Labor Law.

If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws, including the following requirements:
(a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation.
(b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination of the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed under this Agreement.
(c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor. (d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records. (e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 3 Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subconsultants shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.
(f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. (g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and forty (40) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one and one-half (1½) times the basic rate of pay. (h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
Consultant’s Authorized Initials ___________________
Amit Sharma, Chief Executive Officer
(i) Consultant’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor.

1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 4

1.6 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.

1.7 Care of Work.

The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

1.9 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer (as defined below) to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum (or a portion of the compensation due to Consultant) for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $50,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer.

Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.

1.10 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 5 ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Four Dollar ($100,724) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.4 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed to have certified compliance with all provisions of this Agreement. The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “C”, and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 6

2.5 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of this Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding three (3) years from the date hereof (“Term”), except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (as shown on Exhibit “D” attached hereto). The City Manager may, at his sole discretion, extend the Term for two (2) additional one-year terms (each an “Extended Term”), subject to the terms and provisions in Exhibit “C” and Exhibit “D” attached hereto ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.

The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 7 Amit Sharma, Chief Executive Officer
Prachi Sharma, Chief Admin Officer
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the Term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance.

4.2 Status of Consultant.

Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.

4.3 Contract Officer.

The Contract Officer shall be the City’s Public Works Director, or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

4.4 Independent Consultant.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein.

City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 8

4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages.

Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its sole cost and expense during the Term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City. (a) General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
(c) Technology Professional Liability (errors & omissions) Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers claims for loss or disclosure of electronic data, media and content rights infringement and liability, network security failure and software copyright infringement liability due to the failure of Consultant’s products or services in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $2,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement. (d) Workers’ Compensation Insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000). (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 9

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the Term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(b) Duration of Coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
(c) Primary/Noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or selfinsurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. (d) City’s Rights of Enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(e) Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
(f) Waiver of Subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
(g) Enforcement of Contract Provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. (h) Requirements not Limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 10 the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of Cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. (j) Additional Insured Status. General liability and automobile policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies. (k) Prohibition of Undisclosed Coverage Limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved by the City in writing. (l) Separation of Insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
(m) Pass Through Clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the services who is brought onto or involved in the services by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the services will be submitted to City for review. (n) City’s Right to Revise Specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the Term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation. (o) Deductibles / Self-insured Retentions. Any deductibles and self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to the City, it officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, or the Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the city guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expense. (p) Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. (q) Additional Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

5.3 Indemnification.

To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 11 persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.
(d) Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 12 with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment.

Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City.

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 13 (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S.

District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.

7.2 Disputes; Default.

In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant, as determined by the Contract Officer. The cure period may run concurrently with the termination period as provided in Section 7.7, if the option to cure in the alternative to termination. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 14

7.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 15 reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.

If either Party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorneys’ fees on any appeal, and in addition a Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 16

8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Glendora, 116 E. Foothill Blvd., Glendora, California 91741-3380, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement.

Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. Each of the parties intend to be bound by the signatures on any telecopied, .pdf or other electronically delivered document, and are aware that the other party will rely on the telecopied, .pdf or other electronically delivered signatures, and hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the terms of this Agreement based on the form of signature.

9.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement.

No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

9.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 17 paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.

No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect.

Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______________________________ Amit Sharma, Chief Executive Officer

9.7 Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]
Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Agreement- Aquatrax LLC (Customer Web Portal) 09.22.2026 18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF GLENDORA, a municipal corporation
Adam Raymond
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CERTIFY AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
Danny Aleshire
City Attorney
Kyle Johnson
Finance Director/City Treasurer
ATTEST:

Kathleen R. Sessman
City Clerk/Communications Director
CONSULTANT:

AQUATRAX LLC, a California limited liability company
Name: Amit Sharma
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Email Address: [email protected]
Name: Prachi Sharma
Title: Chief Admin Officer
Email Address: [email protected]
Address: 4 Sunrise, Irvine, CA 92603
If Consultant is a limited liability company, any one of the following options will satisfy City’s signature requirements pursuant to the Corporations Code.

Option A: One signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. Option.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 Aug 25, 2026 | 4:41 PM PDT
Aug 26, 2026 | 8:09 PM PDT
01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following services:

A. Community Web Portal and Customer Dashboard
Consultant shall design, configure, and deploy a fully City-branded, cloud-based customer portal and mobile application accessible from any device, including mobile, tablet, and desktop, serving approximately 13,800 water meters throughout the City.

The portal landing page shall serve as a consolidated dashboard providing the following:
• Display current water consumption metrics and the previous month's usage for the current year (“My Water Usage”).
• Present billing account data, including balance due and payment due date. • Enable configuration of threshold-based usage alerts and provide access to message notifications from the utility.
• Visualize customer-specific consumption compared to predefined benchmarks or efficiency targets set by the utility.
• Display the customer's full-service address integrated with an embedded mapping component.
• Communicate utility-defined watering schedules to customers based on local regulations or policies.
• Provide analytical insights into percentage variance and average gallons per day across the preceding two billing periods (“My Daily Average Use”). • Benchmark the customer's water usage relative to other customers with similar consumption profiles (“My Water Score”).
• Provide connectivity to official utility social media channels for customer engagement.
• Allow dynamic localization of the portal's user interface for multilingual support.

B. Track Usage Module
Consultant shall provide a Track Usage module enabling granular consumption analysis, accessible via the portal's left navigation menu.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-2
• Present interactive charts with dynamic filtering by time frame (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, or billing cycle) and by consumption category (normal consumption, irrigation, or leak events).
• Display leak detection indicators, shown in red for an active leak condition and green when no leak is detected.
• Allow users to toggle measurement units between Gallons (default), Cubic Feet (CF), and Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF).
• Update visualization components in real time based on applied filters and leak status changes.
• Provide direct navigation from Track Usage charts to the billing cycle detail page.
• Allow export of usage data for custom timeframes in CSV or PDF format. • Allow users to select a specific meter, define daily or monthly usage threshold limits, choose measurement units, and receive notifications when defined limits are exceeded.

C. Connect with Utility Module
Consultant shall provide a Connect with Utility module supporting bi-directional communication between customers and utility staff.
• Allow customers to submit problem reports directly to utility staff. • Display a chronological log of interactions and communications related to submitted issues, including utility contact information and associated geographic map data for context.

D. Compare Water Use Module
Consultant shall provide a Compare Water Use module offering benchmarking and peer-comparison analytics through graphical representations. • Enable users to evaluate current year consumption against the previous year's data (“My Comparison”).
• Provide comparative analytics against average consumption data for customers within the same ZIP code (“Compare Neighbors”).
• Offer benchmarking against average usage among customers within the same service segment or category (“Compare with Everyone”).

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-3
• Aggregate all comparison modes into a unified dashboard for holistic analysis (“Composite View”).

E. About My Property Module
Consultant shall provide an About My Property module enabling customers to populate survey fields with property-specific details, including property attributes, irrigation system presence, and usage patterns.

F. Account Details Module
Consultant shall provide an Account Details module supporting the following:
• Viewing and updating user profile attributes, including customer name, customer number, account name, account number, contact numbers (mobile, home, work), and email address.
• Multi-account management, allowing users to link multiple service accounts under a single administrative profile, and enabling tenants and property owners to consolidate views and notification management across multiple properties.

G. AI Assistant
Consultant shall provide an AI Assistant module that provides quick, accurate, stepby-step guidance for all system modules and features. • Act as an interactive help guide allowing users to type questions and receive real-time, context-aware responses.
• Support new users exploring the system and existing users learning new features, enabling quick resolution of functionality-related questions without the need for support tickets.

H. View and Pay Bill Module
Consultant shall provide a View and Pay Bill module, applicable if billing functionality is included in the project scope.
• Display account information, including meter number, account balance, billing period, due date, and total water usage.
• Provide a payment details view showing a breakdown of consumption charges and additional applicable fees.
• Provide billing history with filterable historical bill records by date range, including account number, bill date, due date, amount due, and consumption data, with a download link for the PDF bill document.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-4
I. Billing System Integration
Consultant shall support integration between the customer portal and the City's existing online billing system.
• Support Single Sign-On (SSO) from the existing online biller and bidirectional single sign-on between the customer portal and the billing system. • Allow customers to access usage information directly from the billing portal and be automatically authenticated into Consultant's platform, or initiate billing actions from within Consultant's portal without re-entering credentials. • Where supported, securely embed payment functionality within Consultant's interface via secure iFrame, allowing customers to complete billing actions without navigating away.
• Maintain the billing system as the authoritative system of record while providing a seamless, integrated user experience.

J. Notifications
Consultant shall provide a Notifications interface accessible via the portal's left navigation menu.
• Allow users to view historical notifications, including water usage reports, threshold breach alerts, and utility service communications, with keywordbased search, category-based filtering, and metadata display (title, date timestamp, and associated attachments).
• Allow users to configure notification preferences under a Settings section, including enabling or disabling usage threshold notifications, periodic water reports, utility connect messages, account update communications, and quiet hours for suppressing service alerts during defined timeframes; leak alerts shall be mandatory and may not be disabled.

K. Utility (Admin) Portal Dashboard
Consultant shall provide a utility-facing administrative dashboard displaying water consumption data sourced from billing systems (monthly data) and AMI systems (hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly interval data).
• Support selection of measurement units, including Gallons, Cubic Feet (CF), and Hundred Cubic Feet (HCF).
• Deliver actionable insights on water supply, loss, and billing trends using gauges, charts, and scatter plots to monitor efficiency and identify anomalies.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-5
• Enable deeper analysis of customer usage patterns and potential leaks, and facilitate compliance tracking and conservation planning through real-time data.

L. Customer Analytics, Management, and Mapping
Consultant shall provide customer analytics, management, and mapping tools for utility staff.
• Present customer data through interactive charts segmented by customer type (e.g., residential, commercial) and searchable, filterable tables showing customer name, account number, meter information, customer segment, service and billing addresses, contact details, landscape area, and AMI status. • Enable column-level filtering and search, radio button selection for batch notifications, and drill-down into individual customer details, including property and meter information, water usage, units, and customer notes or comments.
• Provide a “View as Customer” feature for administrative preview and direct notification dispatch with communication template previews. • Integrate geographic mapping to visualize service addresses and meter locations, draw polygons to select areas affected by leaks, high usage, or other events, identify customers in selected areas, and send notifications directly from the map view.

M. Potential Leak Analytics
Consultant shall provide analytics for potential water leaks. • Provide dashboard and list views of leak events, segmented by customer type, including leak reporting data fields such as customer name, account number, leak type, status, segment, meter details, current usage, service address, contact information, usage date, time to resolve, estimated water savings, total water lost, in-progress duration, and assigned caseworkers.
• Enable data downloads in Excel, PDF, and CSV formats, drill-down to customer-specific usage and leak activity timelines, tracking of leak analytics KPIs, and timeline progression of leak events, including access to communication history for leak alerts.
• Provide configurable leak detection logic.

N. High Usage Analytics
Consultant shall provide dashboards and reports on high water usage events.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-6
• Include high usage details such as customer name, account number, issue subcategory, status, segment, current and previous usage values, meter size and number, high usage threshold configuration, service address, contact details, and usage date.
• Enable data downloads in Excel, PDF, and CSV formats and notification dispatch to customers from high-usage reports.
• Include administrative configuration for high usage thresholds, set as either absolute consumption volumes or percentage increases, configurable separately for each meter size and customer segment.

O. Campaign Messaging and Insights
Consultant shall facilitate large-scale email campaigns. • Support recipient list management via uploaded account files and various message types, including registration, account updates, and usage alerts. • Display graphical reports of campaign delivery metrics, including delivered, not delivered, and completed statuses, with filtering by campaign category and data export in PDF, image, or CSV formats.

P. User Behavior and Utilization Analysis
Consultant shall provide analytics for user behavior within the customer portal. • Include active users, active meters, high usage incidents over the past seven days, and potential leak occurrences.
• Display utilization of individual modules with monthly and yearly filtering, graphical visualizations, and export capabilities in PDF, image, or CSV formats.

Q. Water Loss Analytics
Consultant shall provide Water Loss Analytics, including year-round insights, trend analysis, dynamic charts, support for multiple measurement units, and regulatory support.

R. Reporting and Data Exports
Consultant shall allow export of reports and analytics in common formats. • Support export formats including Excel, PDF, CSV, and image formats for charts.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-7
• Provide high performance for large data sets to ensure timely report generation, and provide the list of reports as identified per the City's preference.

S. Issue Resolution and Quality Assurance
Consultant shall provide an inbuilt issue reporting and resolution system accessible to City staff.
• Provide a service level agreement (SLA) for issue resolution, with urgent or hot-fix issues delivered within twenty-four (24) hours. • Follow an Agile Azure DevOps pipeline for deployments, released on a biweekly cycle.

T. System Integration — AMI (Xylem/Sensus) and Billing (Tyler Technologies) Consultant shall integrate its platform with the City's existing AMI system (Xylem/Sensus) and billing system (Tyler Technologies), ensuring a low-risk, nondisruptive implementation aligned with the City's existing infrastructure. • Integrate with the City's Xylem/Sensus AMI system for ingestion of interval consumption data for usage analytics, leak detection, and alerts. • Integrate with the City's Tyler Technologies billing and payment system for synchronization of customer account, service, and billing data for portal visibility, without performing bill calculation or account creation. • Provide secure redirection or embedded access to external payment platforms; Consultant shall not process payments or store payment card industry (PCI) data.
• Integrate with communication systems (e.g., SMS/email platforms) for multichannel messaging, including alerts and customer notifications. • Provide usage and engagement context to support customer inquiries through CRM and customer service system integration, without replacing the City's existing CRM workflows.
• Support integration via API, SFTP, and iFrame, enabling seamless connectivity while maintaining operational continuity and preserving existing workflows, business rules, and data governance.

U. Data Import and Quality
Consultant shall provide data management and quality assurance capabilities. • Accept exports from the billing system, including contact, location, and account attributes.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-8
• Validate phone numbers, emails, and addresses and surface suggested corrections, and allow secure updates to customer contact information submitted through the portal.
• Provide data safeguards, including data security measures and privacy protections, with the City retaining exclusive proprietary ownership of all customer and system data.

V. Security and Compliance
Consultant shall maintain enterprise-grade security and compliance practices throughout the term of the Agreement.
• Provide secure authentication with strong password policies, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and session management.
• Provide data encryption using TLS in transit and AES-256 at rest. • Maintain comprehensive audit logging for user activity and system changes. • Provide continuous monitoring with real-time anomaly detection, configurable alerts, and system health dashboards.
• Host the platform in a secure, enterprise-grade cloud environment ensuring high availability, scalability, end-to-end encryption, automated updates, and disaster recovery readiness.

W. Implementation Services
Consultant shall implement the platform using a structured, phased methodology with an estimated timeline of 8–12 weeks, followed by a stabilization and support phase. • Initiation and Planning (Weeks 1–2): Conduct project kickoff, scope confirmation, stakeholder alignment, and integration planning. • Configuration and Integration (Weeks 3–4): Complete platform setup, security configuration, role-based access, and integration with the City's AMI and billing systems.
• Testing and Validation (Weeks 5–6): Conduct internal QA testing and User Acceptance Testing (UAT) with City staff to validate data accuracy, dashboards, alerts, and workflows.
• Deployment and Go-Live (Week 7): Complete production deployment, activation of portal, dashboards, alerts, and system verification. • Training and Knowledge Transfer (Week 8): Conduct staff training sessions and deliver documentation and recorded materials.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-9
• Stabilization and Support (Weeks 9–12): Provide post-deployment monitoring, issue resolution, and transition to ongoing support.

X. Training and Enablement
Consultant shall provide training and enablement services, including tailored training programs for administrators, customer service, and IT teams, supported by customized documentation, recorded videos, and in-application guidance, with optional remote or on-site sessions for advanced users.

Y. Ongoing Support and Maintenance
Consultant shall provide ongoing support and maintenance throughout the term of the Agreement.
• Provide multi-channel support through phone, email, and ticketing system, with a dedicated account manager and SLA-based response times. • Provide regular platform updates for enhancements, fixes, and security improvements on a bi-weekly release cycle.

II. As part of the services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City:

A. Project kickoff and implementation plan.

B. Configured customer portal and administrative dashboards, including the modules described in Section I above.

C. Integrated data pipelines for AMI, billing, and communication systems.

D. Tested and validated system, including QA and User Acceptance Testing (UAT) support documentation.

E. Training materials, documentation, and recorded training sessions.

F. Post-go-live support and performance monitoring reports.

III. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:

A. Regular progress updates at each project implementation milestone, including written confirmation of deliverable completion and acceptance criteria met.

B. Post-go-live stabilization reports during the Stabilization and Support phase, documenting system performance, issue resolution status, and transition to ongoing support.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 A-10
C. Monthly performance and utilization reports following go-live, including portal usage trends, campaign delivery metrics, leak program outcomes, and system health status.

IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

V. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the services:

A. Amit Sharma, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Aquatrax LLC, serving as primary point of contact and executive sponsor for the engagement.

B. Such additional project management, configuration, integration, and support personnel as identified by Consultant in its proposal and approved by the City's Contract Officer prior to commencement of services.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
Added text is indicated in bold italics, deleted text is indicated in strikethrough.

I. Section 5.1 (g) (Cyber Liability Insurance) is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:

Section 5.1(g). Cyber Liability Insurance. appropriate to the Consultant's profession and work hereunder, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by the Consultant in this Agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, infringement of intellectual property, copyright, trademark, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, release of private information, cyber extortion, and network security breach. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.
(a) The policy shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information "property" of the City in the care, custody, or control of the Consultant. If not covered under the Consultant's liability policy, such "property" coverage of the City may be endorsed onto the Consultant's Cyber Liability Policy as covered property as follows:
(b) Cyber Liability coverage in an amount sufficient to cover the full replacement value of damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information "property" of the City that will be in the care, custody, or control of Consultant.
(c) The Insurance obligations under this Agreement shall be the greater of (1) all the Insurance coverage and limits carried by or available to the Consultant; or (2) the minimum Insurance requirements shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required, which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum Insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the indemnity or other obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement.

II. Section 1.11 (Licensing/Permitted Use) is added to the Agreement as follows:

1.11 Licensing/Permitted Use.
a) Intellectual Property Ownership. Consultant and its licensors own all IP Rights in the products. Consultant Products ("Products") shall mean the online or cloud subscription services, on premise software, and embedded software licensed to City, and Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 B-2
hardware components purchased by City under this Agreement. Products do not include hardware purchased by the City, City Data, or Deliverables specifically created for the City under this Agreement. City and its authorized users have no right, title or interest in the Products other than the license rights expressly granted herein. All rights not expressly granted in the Products are reserved by the Consultant or its licensors. b) License to Products. Consultant hereby grants City a non-exclusive, nontransferable license to access and use the Products identified in Exhibit “A” during the Term of this Agreement.. Consultant reserves all right, title and interest in and to all Consultant Products, including all rights not expressly granted to City under this contract.
c) Deliverables. For the Scope of Services, "Deliverable(s)" shall mean any use of computer software, written documentation, reports or materials developed or provided by Consultant specifically for City pursuant to a Scope of Services. Consultant grants City, to satisfy its contractual obligations to City, a non-exclusive, non-transferable, royalty-free, perpetual license to use the Deliverables on behalf of and for the benefit of City for City's internal use and with the Consultant Products. Consultant retains all right, title and interest to the Deliverables except for those rights expressly granted to City by Consultant and reserves all rights not otherwise expressly granted herein. d) Third Party Contractors. City may permit its third-party contractors to access and use the Products solely on behalf of and for the benefit of City, so long as: (i) such contractor agrees to comply with this contract as if it were City; (ii) City remains responsible for each contractor's compliance with this contract and any breach thereof; and (iii) all volume or transaction-based use of the Products includes use by contractors.

All rights granted to any contractor terminate immediately upon conclusion of the services rendered to City that give rise to such right. e) Data Ownership and Sources. City shall retain exclusive proprietary ownership of all customer and system data. Consultant will not sell, use, or disclose any personal information provided by City for any purpose other than performing services subject to this Agreement. City may only upload data related to individuals that originates with or is owned by City.
f) Restrictions. City shall not: (i) use the Products to store or display adult content, promote illegal activities, send infringing, obscene, threatening or unlawful material, or disrupt others' use of the Products; (ii) disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer or make derivative works of the Products; (iii) rent, lease, lend, or host the Products to or for any third party except as otherwise permitted in this contract; (iv) use the Products in violation of any applicable law; or (v) modify, adapt, or use the Products to develop any software application intended for resale which uses or competes with the Products in whole or in part.

III. Section 2.2 (Method of Compensation) of the Agreement shall be modified as follows:

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 B-3
The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

Annual Cloud Hosting Fee Renewal. The annual cloud hosting and subscription fee component of the compensation set forth in Exhibit "C" shall commence on the date the web portal is deployed to production and made accessible to City water customers ("Go-Live Date"), not on the date this Agreement is executed. The first annual subscription period shall run from the Go-Live Date through the first anniversary thereof. Each subsequent annual subscription period shall commence on each anniversary of the Go-Live Date during the Term, including any Extended Term(s). Onetime implementation fees, setup fees, and training fees shall be invoiced in accordance with the milestone schedule set forth in Exhibit "C" and are not subject to this Go-Live Date commencement provision. Consultant shall provide written notice to the Contract Officer confirming the Go-Live Date within five (5) business days after the Go-Live Date.

IV. Section 2.4 (Invoices) of the Agreement shall be modified as follows:

Subject to the Contract Sum and all other limitations set forth in this Agreement, City shall pay the fees, costs, and other amounts specified in Exhibit “C.” Annual subscription fees shall be invoiced at the beginning of each annual subscription period commencing on the Go-Live Date, as defined in Exhibit “B.” Service fees and one-time fees shall be invoiced according to the billing schedule specified in Exhibit “C.” Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed to have certified compliance with all provisions of this Agreement. The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “C”, and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 B-4
shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

City will pay all fees, costs and other amounts as specified in Exhibit "C." Annual subscription fees are due at the beginning of each annual subscription period commencing on the Go-Live Date as defined in Section III above. Services fees and one-time fees are due according to the billing frequency specified in Exhibit "C." Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City's Director of Finance. The invoice shall detail charges for Consultant Products, services, and all necessary and actual expenses. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.

V. Section 1.7 (Care of Work; Warranties) of the Agreement shall be modified as follows:

Consultant warrants that it takes all precautions that are standard in the industry to increase the likelihood of a successful performance for the Consultant Products and services.

Consultant warrants that the platform shall perform materially in accordance with the Scope of Services set forth in Exhibit "A." Consultant shall maintain the platform in a secure, enterprise-grade cloud environment (Microsoft Azure) ensuring high availability, scalability, end-to-end encryption, automated updates, and disaster recovery readiness, as specified in Exhibit "A."
VI. Section 6.4 (Confidentiality and Release of Information) of the Agreement shall be modified as follows:
(a) During performance of the services, each Party may receive Confidential Information of the other Party. “Confidential Information” means all confidential and/or trade secret information of either Party (“Disclosing Party”), including, but not limited to: (i) Consultant’s Products; (ii) all information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement; (iii) non-public information that is clearly and conspicuously marked as “confidential” or with a similar designation at the time of disclosure; (iv) non-public information of the Disclosing Party that is identified as confidential and/or proprietary before, during, or promptly after presentation or communication; and (v) any information that should reasonably be understood to be confidential or proprietary given the nature of the information and the context in which it is disclosed to the other Party (“Receiving Party”) or to which the Receiving Party gains access in connection with performance of the services. Confidential Information does not include information that is in the public domain or was already lawfully known to the Receiving Party without an obligation of confidentiality.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 B-5
To the maximum extent permitted by the California Public Records Act and other applicable law, each Receiving Party shall: (i) protect and safeguard Confidential Information against unauthorized use, publication, or disclosure; (ii) not reveal, report, publish, disclose, transfer, copy, or otherwise use Confidential Information except as specifically authorized by the Disclosing Party or required by applicable law; (iii) not use Confidential Information for any purpose other than performance of this Agreement; (iv) restrict access to Confidential Information to its advisors, officers, directors, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors who have a need to know, have been advised of its confidential nature, and are subject to written confidentiality obligations; and (v) exercise at least the same degree of care and security used to protect its own confidential information, but no less than a reasonable degree of care. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Without limiting the foregoing, Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) If a Receiving Party is requested or required under the California Public Records Act, or in a judicial, administrative, or governmental proceeding, to disclose any Confidential Information, the Receiving Party shall notify the Disclosing Party as promptly as practicable so that the Disclosing Party may seek an appropriate protective order or waiver, unless such notification is prohibited by law or judicial order. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. The City shall retain sole authority to determine its disclosure obligations under the California Public Records Act and other applicable law.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 B-6
(e) Upon written request of the Disclosing Party, the Receiving Party shall promptly return or destroy all Confidential Information in its possession and, upon request, certify its destruction in writing; provided, however, that the Receiving Party may retain archival copies in accordance with its records-retention policies and subject to this Section. The City’s obligations under this subsection are subject to applicable law, records-retention requirements, litigation holds, audits, investigations, and pending public records requests.
a)
VIII. DISPUTES; DEFAULT
Either party may terminate this Agreement or any Order or Scope of Services by written notice if the other party commits a material breach of this Agreement or the applicable Order or Scope of Services and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice, or an additional period of time as agreed to by the parties.

IX. Section 7.7 (Termination Prior to Expiration of Term) of the Agreement shall be modified as follows:

Section 7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. Upon the effective date of termination, the City’s right to access and use the Products shall cease, except for any perpetual licenses granted under this Agreement and any access required to complete the data export, migration, and transition obligations set forth in Exhibit “B.” Each Party shall return or destroy any Confidential Information of the other Party in its possession and, upon request, certify its compliance with the foregoing, subject to applicable law, records-retention requirements, litigation holds, and the City’s rights under this Agreement. In the event Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 B-7
of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

X. Article 6 of the Agreement shall be modified to add the following additional sections:

Section 6.5. Service Level Agreement and Support. In addition to the support and maintenance requirements set forth in Exhibit "A," Consultant shall deliver any urgent or hot-fix issue resolution within twenty-four (24) hours. Consultant shall provide regular platform updates on a bi-weekly release cycle, including enhancements, fixes, and security improvements. Consultant represents an up-time guarantee of 99.9% per calendar quarter for its hosted services.

Downtime is defined as any time that the Consultant's hosted services are unavailable. A Site Outage is defined as continuous Downtime, as determined through URL monitoring (HTTP). A Site Outage does not include Downtime resulting from: (i) scheduled or routine maintenance; (ii) force majeure; or (iii) City's own acts or omissions, including City DNS issues. Consultant shall notify the Contract Officer of any Site Outage within one (1) hour from the time the Site Outage is first recognized by Consultant.

Section 6.6. Data Security and Breach Notification. Consultant shall comply throughout the Term with the security and compliance requirements set forth in Exhibit “A.” In the event of any actual or reasonably suspected unauthorized access to, or acquisition of, City data or customer personal information ("Data Breach"), Consultant shall: (i) notify the City's Contract Officer in writing within twenty-four (24) hours of discovery; (ii) cooperate fully with the City in investigating and remediating the Data Breach; (iii) at Consultant's sole cost and expense, provide credit monitoring services to affected individuals as required by applicable law; and (iv) take all reasonable steps to prevent recurrence. Consultant shall comply with all applicable data breach notification laws, including California Civil Code Section 1798.82 et seq.

Section 6.7 Data Backup, Migration, and Transition. Consultant shall maintain regular backups of all City data in accordance with industry best practices. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, Consultant shall, at City's request and at no additional cost, provide City with a complete export of all City data in a standard, machine-readable format (e.g., CSV, Excel, or database export) within thirty (30) calendar days. Consultant shall cooperate in good faith with any successor vendor to facilitate an orderly transition of services. Following the City’s written confirmation that the data transfer has been successfully completed, Consultant shall securely destroy all City data in its possession within fifteen (15) calendar days and certify such destruction in writing.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the Services at the rates set forth in the compensation table in Exhibit “C-1”.

A. One-Time Implementation Fee. The implementation fee of Twenty-Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($23,500.00) is a one-time fee and shall not recur during the Term or any Extended Term. The one-time implementation fee shall be invoiced in accordance with Section 2.2 of the Agreement.

B. Initial Term. The annual support, maintenance, and cloud-hosting fees identified for Years 1 through 3 apply during the initial Term of the Agreement and shall commence on the Go-Live Date as provided in Section

2.2. C. Optional Extended Terms. Years 4 and 5 correspond to the two optional oneyear Extended Terms authorized by Section 3.4 of the Agreement. The City Manager may, at his sole discretion, exercise either Extended Term by providing written notice prior to the expiration of the then-current Term or Extended Term. If the City exercises an Extended Term, the compensation for that Extended Term shall not exceed the applicable amount identified in the compensation table set forth in Exhibit “C-1” attached hereto. The City is not obligated to exercise either Extended Term or to pay any amount identified for Year 4 or Year 5 unless the applicable Extended Term is exercised in writing. Neither Extended Term shall renew automatically.

II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.9.

III. The City will compensate Consultant for the services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice shall identify the applicable fee, billing period, and amount invoiced. To the extent applicable, each invoice shall also include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 C-2
IV. The total compensation for the initial Term, including the one-time implementation fee and the annual compensation for Years 1 through 3, shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement. If the City exercises an optional Extended Term, the Contract Sum shall be increased by the applicable amount identified in the compensation table for that Extended Term, subject to all required City approvals and the availability and appropriation of funds. In no event shall compensation for an optional Extended Term be due unless the City has exercised that Extended Term in writing..

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 C-1
EXHIBIT “C-1”

COMPENSATION TABLE
Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81 01240.0001 2173686.1 7/30/2026 D-1
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all services as described in Exhibit “A”, in accordance with the implementation schedule set forth in Exhibit “A” and the project kickoff and implementation plan approved by the Contract Officer.

II. Consultant shall deliver all work products described in Exhibit “A”, in accordance with the implementation schedule set forth in Exhibit “A” and shall provide progress updates at each project implementation milestone.

III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC0B6955-B28E-8851-80DF-A5405AD05C81

CONSIDER A PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT WITH AQUATRAX, LLC FOR THE WATER CUSTOMER WEB PORTAL AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $100,724 DURING THE INITIAL TERM OF THE AGREEMENT (QUESTCDN # 10047360)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT- WATER DIVISION

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 22, 2026

ARMANDO DE JESUS, MANAGEMENT ANALYST

WHY A NEW CUSTOMER PORTAL IS NEEDED
SENSUS AMI SYSTEM INSTALLED IN 2015
• APPROXIMATELY 13,500 WATER METERS

CITYWIDE
• HANDLES METER READS, BILLING DATA,

CUSTOMER PORTAL

SENSUS ANALYTICS PLATFORM BEING SUNSET

BY MANUFACTURER
• RISK TO UNINTERRUPTED CUSTOMER SERVICE

CITY MUST TRANSITION TO A NEW PORTAL

SOLUTION
13,500
Water meters relying on the legacy system
!
Sensus Analytics platform is being
sunset
City must transition before support ends

RFP PROCESS & EVALUATION
RFP #10047360 RELEASED FEBRUARY 12, 2026
• PROPOSALS DUE MARCH 12, 2026
• 7 PROPOSALS RECEIVED
• 3 shortlisted for interviews

EVALUATION CRITERIA
• QUALIFICATIONS — 20%
• REFERENCES — 20%
• FEE SCHEDULE — 50%
• INTERVIEW — 10%
Evaluation Weighting
20% 20% 50% 10%
Qualifications — 20% Fee Schedule — 50%
References — 20% Interview — 10%
7 proposals

VENDOR EVALUATION RESULTS
Vendor Three-Year Cost Total Score
Yoppify $173,885.00 75
Vertexone $87,017.60 86
AquaTrax $100,723.05 88
AquaTrax scored highest overall, with the strongest fit for City needs.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMEND AWARD TO AQUATRAX, LLC
• HIGHEST SCORE (88), STRONG ALIGNMENT
• 8 TO 10 WEEK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
• PROVEN CALIFORNIA UTILITY REFERENCES

BEST OVERALL VALUE, NOT LOWEST COST

CONTRACT TERMS
• 3-YEAR TERM + UP TO 2 ONE YEAR RENEWALS
(5 YEARS TOTAL)
• NOT TO EXCEED $100,723.05 (3 YEAR PERIOD)
Vendor Scores
Zippity
75 Vertexone
86 AquaTrax
88 Best Overall Value

ABOUT AQUATRAX

AI DRIVEN WATER CONSERVATION PLATFORM
• HEADQUARTERED IN IRVINE, CALIFORNIA
• EXPERIENCE WITH PUBLIC WATER UTILITIES

CORE PRODUCTS
• CUSTOMER PORTAL & MOBILE APPS
• UTILITY PORTAL FOR ADMIN & OPERATIONS
• LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT APP

TRUSTED BY CALIFORNIA AND UTAH UTILITIES

DASHBOARD FEATURES
• REAL TIME USAGE GRAPHS
• BILLING & BUDGET TRACKING
• USAGE LIMIT ALERTS
• USAGE COMPARISON & WATER SCORE
• ALWAYS ON, WEB & MOBILE ACCESS

CUSTOMER WEB PORTAL
Standard water consumption tracking
Usage — Blue
Leak — Red
High-confidence leak detection
Possible Leak — Yellow
Anomaly flagged for review
Outdoor and landscape water use
Irrigation — Green

MYAQUATRAX MOBILE APP
• IOS & ANDROID
• REAL TIME USAGE & BUDGET TRACKING
• INSTANT LEAK ALERTS
• AI POWERED LEAK DETECTION
• UP TO 30% LESS NON-REVENUE WATER LOSS

MOBILE APP & AI POWERED LEAK DETECTION
Mobile app Leak flagged automatically

IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
APPROXIMATELY 16 WEEKS, FIVE PHASES
Kickoff
3 wks
1 Stakeholders &
integration planning
Integration
4 wks
2 Data mapping &
third party APIs
Configuration
4 wks
3 Application
walkthrough & testing
Deployment
1 wk
4 Production cutover
& verification
Post-Deploy
4 wks
5 Training &
ongoing support

FISCAL IMPACT
Annual Expenditure Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Implementation Fee $23,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
Annual SaaS Fee $23,184.00 $23,879.52 $24,595.91
Annual Cloud Hosting Fee $1,800.00 $1,854.00 $1,909.62
Total $48,484.00 $25,733.52 $26,505.53
Three Year Total Cost: $100,723.05
Sufficient Appropriations in the FY 2026-27 Adopted Mid-Cycle Budget Water Operation Fund (501) Customer Service Division 50170610.59100.

All images are
placeholders. Click on
image and use “Insert” >
“picture from file” to swap
images as needed

RECOMMENDED
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:

1. AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES TO

AQUATRAX, LLC FOR THE WATER CUSTOMER PORTAL AND

NOTIFICATION SYSTEM, EFFECTIVE FROM THE DATE OF
MUTUAL EXECUTION FOR AN INITIAL PERIOD OF THREE (3)

YEARS, WITH THE OPTION TO RENEW ON AN ANNUAL BASIS
FOR UP TO TWO (2) ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS, FOR
A TOTAL CONTRACT TERM NOT TO EXCEED FIVE (5) YEARS,
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $100,724 FOR THE INITIAL

THREE YEAR PERIOD, AND

2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE
AGREEMENT AND ANY SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS.

STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: September 22, 2026
FROM: Public Works DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Adoption of the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project State Clearinghouse No. 2025101085

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Adopt a City Council Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

GLENDORA ADOPTING THE FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE NORTH GLENDORA RESERVOIR REPLACEMENT PROJECT";

2. Authorize the appropriate City official to file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the Los Angeles County Clerk and State Clearinghouse within five (5) business days following adoption of the Final IS/MND, and authorize payment of the applicable California Department of Fish and Wildlife environmental filing fee; and

3. Authorize City staff to proceed with subsequent administrative and permitting activities necessary to advance the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project consistent with the Final IS/MND and MMRP.

STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 4 - Sustainable Infrastructure

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to adopt the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project.

Adoption of the Final IS/MND and MMRP would complete the City's environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and allow the Project to proceed through subsequent administrative and permitting activities.

The Draft IS/MND was circulated for public review, and the City received one comment letter from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). In response, additional biological surveys were conducted, and the Final IS/MND incorporates the responses to comments and associated revisions.

The Final IS/MND concludes that the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts can be reduced to lessthan-significant levels through implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the MMRP (Chapter 4, Table 4-1).

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
On May 24, 2022, the City Council approved an amended Fiscal Year 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program establishing the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project, and approved Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers for final design services for the Project. At the same meeting, the City Council awarded the environmental review contract for EPD Solutions for environmental services in the amount of $86,020.

On August 27, 2024, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the EPD Solutions agreement, increasing the agreement by $86,597 for a total amount of $172,617 and extending the agreement term by two additional oneyear periods.

On March 24, 2026, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the EPD Solutions agreement in the amount of $17,575, increasing the total agreement amount to $190,191 and extending the agreement term through May 24, 2027. The amendment provided additional biological surveys and coordination in response to comments received from CDFW during the CEQA public review process.

DISCUSSION
Project Description
The North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project consists of replacing the existing approximately 0.3 milliongallon (MG) bolted steel Reservoir B with two new approximately 0.3 MG welded steel reservoirs, identified as NGR-A and NGR-B.

The approximately two-acre Project site is located at the northerly end of North Glendora Avenue and includes Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8636-015-902 and 8636-015-020. The site is designated Low Density Residential and E-7 under the City's General Plan and is located within Pressure Zone 3A. The existing reservoir serves an approximately 156-acre service area.

Construction is anticipated to occur in two phases over approximately 22 months. During Phase I, NGR-A would be constructed while the existing Reservoir B remains operational. During Phase II, Reservoir B would be demolished, and NGR-B would be constructed. The Project also includes associated pipelines and access road improvements.

CEQA Review
The City, as the CEQA Lead Agency, prepared an IS/MND for the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project.

The Draft IS/MND was circulated for public review from October 23 through November 21, 2025, under State Clearinghouse No. 2025101085. The City received one comment letter from CDFW during the public review period.

The Final IS/MND incorporates responses to comments received during the public review period, revisions to the environmental analysis and mitigation measures, and additional technical information obtained following circulation of the Draft IS/MND. The Final IS/MND concludes that the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of the identified mitigation measures and applicable Plans, Programs, and Policies.

Response to CDFW Comments and Final Technical Studies
CDFW submitted a comment letter dated November 18, 2025, during the Draft IS/MND public review period. In response to CDFW's comments, additional biological review was conducted by qualified biologists, including protocol level surveys for Crotch's bumble bee and coastal California gnatcatcher.

Three surveys for Crotch's bumble bee were conducted on April 7, April 29, and May 14, 2026. No Crotch's bumble bees were detected during the surveys. Six coastal California gnatcatcher surveys were conducted between April 7 and May 30, 2026, within approximately 5.15 acres of suitable coastal sage scrub habitat. No coastal California gnatcatchers were detected.

The additional survey reports have been incorporated into the Final IS/MND as Appendices H and I. The Final IS/MND also incorporates responses to all 11 CDFW comments, revisions to BIO-2 and BIO-3, and an Errata documenting changes made following the public review period.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The Final IS/MND includes the MMRP in Chapter 4, Table 4-1. The MMRP identifies the applicable mitigation measures and Plans, Programs, and Policies, along with implementation requirements, timing, and responsible parties.

The proposed Resolution adopts the MMRP contained in Chapter 4, Table 4-1, of the Final IS/MND.

Adoption and Subsequent Steps
Adoption of the Final IS/MND and MMRP constitutes the discretionary approval addressed by this action. Additional approvals, permits, and other administrative actions may be required as the Project advances.

This item does not authorize construction, award a construction contract, approve a contractor, authorize change orders, or appropriate construction funds. Any future construction contract or related authorization will be presented to the City Council separately, as required.

Notice of Determination
Following adoption of the Final IS/MND and MMRP, the City will complete the applicable post adoption CEQA filing requirements. The City Manager or designee will file the NOD with the Los Angeles County Clerk and State Clearinghouse within five (5) business days following project approval and coordinate payment of the applicable CDFW environmental filing fee.

FISCAL IMPACT
Implementation of the MMRP is anticipated to result in additional environmental monitoring and compliance costs as the Project advances and after the construction of the project is completed. Based on a high-level estimate provided by EPD Solutions, the cost to implement the MMRP is estimated at approximately $250,000. These costs are associated with future Project implementation and are not being appropriated or authorized as part of this action.

The applicable CDFW environmental filing fee associated with the NOD will also be required.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Based on the Initial Study and the whole of the administrative record, including the Final IS/MND, Response to Comments, Errata, technical appendices, and additional survey reports, the City Council may adopt the Final IS/MND upon finding that there is no substantial evidence that the Project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment.

Adoption of the Final IS/MND and MMRP would complete the City's CEQA environmental review for the Project.

Prepared By: Ivy Gonzalez, Management Analyst
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Hal Ghafari, Director of Public Works
Certified to Availability of Funds: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review: Sean McPherson, Assistant Community Development Director Attachments
A_Final_Inital_Study-Mitigated_Negative_Declaration_North_Glendora_Reservoir.pdf B_RESOLUTION_N_Glendrora_Reservoir.pdf
C_MND_Presentation.pdf

FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION

FOR THE

NORTH GLENDORA RESERVOIR

REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Lead Agency:

City of Glendora
Public Works
116 E. Foothill Blvd.

Glendora, CA 91741
Project Contact:

Water Division
Paul Zampiello
1051 E. Sierra Madre Ave.

Glendora, CA 91741
[email protected]
CEQA Consultant:
3333 Michelson Drive, Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92612
July 2026
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project This page left intentionally blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 1 Contents
1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................5 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT IS/MND ..............................................7 3 ERRATA TO THE PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT IS/MND........................................................................... 29 4 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN..................................................................... 34 5 FINAL IS/MND.................................................................................................................................... 41 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING....................................................................................................................... 41 PROJECT LOCATION........................................................................................................................................... 41 EXISTING PROJECT SITE ...................................................................................................................................... 41 GLENDORA’S WATER SYSTEM........................................................................................................................... 41 EXISTING WATER TANK ...................................................................................................................................... 41 SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS ................................................................ 42 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................. 59 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................... 59 PROJECT FEATURES.............................................................................................................................................. 59 Overview........................................................................................................................................................... 59 Water Tanks ..................................................................................................................................................... 59 Site Access and Maintenance........................................................................................................................... 59 Offsite Improvements....................................................................................................................................... 60 Fencing and Walls............................................................................................................................................ 60 Additional Improvements................................................................................................................................. 60 CONSTRUCTION PHASES ................................................................................................................................... 60 Phase I............................................................................................................................................................... 60 Phase II.............................................................................................................................................................. 61 Construction Equipment & Timeline ................................................................................................................. 61 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS............................................................................................................................ 62 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST................................................................................................................... 81 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................................... 81 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED................................................................................... 82 DETERMINATION: ................................................................................................................................................. 83 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................... 85 AESTHETICS........................................................................................................................................................... 85 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. ................................................................................................... 88 AIR QUALITY. ........................................................................................................................................................ 90 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES................................................................................................................................... 96 CULTURAL RESOURCES. ....................................................................................................................................105 ENERGY. ..............................................................................................................................................................108 GEOLOGY AND SOILS......................................................................................................................................110 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. .....................................................................................................................115 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.......................................................................................................118 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY..............................................................................................................122 LAND USE AND PLANNING ..............................................................................................................................127 MINERAL RESOURCES........................................................................................................................................128 NOISE. 129
POPULATION AND HOUSING..........................................................................................................................135 PUBLIC SERVICES................................................................................................................................................136 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 2 RECREATION. ......................................................................................................................................................138 TRANSPORTATION. ...........................................................................................................................................139 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.........................................................................................................................142 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.....................................................................................................................145 WILDFIRES...........................................................................................................................................................149 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. ................................................................................................152 DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS .................................................................................... 155 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 156 Tables
TABLE BIO-2: POTENTIALLY OCCURRING WILDLIFE SPECIES................................................................................................................ 30 TABLE 4-1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM.................................................................................. 35 TABLE 1: SURROUNDING EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS....................................................................................... 42 TABLE 2: CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................................................. 61 TABLE AQ-1: SCAQMD REGIONAL DAILY EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS.................................................................................................. 91 TABLE AQ-2: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS AND REGIONAL THRESHOLDS .............................................................................. 92 TABLE AQ-3: OFFSITE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS AND REGIONAL THRESHOLDS....................................... 93 TABLE AQ-4: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ........................................................................................................................ 93 TABLE AQ-4: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ........................................................................... 94 TABLE AQ-5: LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY OF OFFSITE IMPROVEMENT EMISSIONS ................................................................. 94 TABLE BIO-1: POTENTIALLY OCCURRING PLANT SPECIES.................................................................................................................... 97 TABLE BIO-2: POTENTIALLY OCCURRING WILDLIFE SPECIES................................................................................................................ 99 TABLE E-1: ENERGY CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES DURING CONSTRUCTION..........................................................................................108 TABLE GHG-1: CONSTRUCTION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS......................................................................................................116 TABLE N-1: FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION DAYTIME CONSTRUCTION NOISE CRITERIA...............................................................130 TABLE N-2: VIBRATION ANNOYANCE CRITERIA.................................................................................................................................130 TABLE N-3: VIBRATION DAMAGE CRITERIA .......................................................................................................................................131 TABLE N-4: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVELS.......................................................................................................131 TABLE N-5: CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT SENSITIVE RECEIVERS .................................................................................................132 TABLE N-6: VIBRATION SOURCE AMPLITUDES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT................................................................................133 Figures
FIGURE 2-1: REGIONAL LOCATION .................................................................................................................................................... 43 FIGURE 2-2: LOCAL VICINITY ............................................................................................................................................................. 45 FIGURE 2-3: AERIAL........................................................................................................................................................................... 47 FIGURE 2-4A: EXISTING SITE PHOTOS................................................................................................................................................ 49 FIGURE 2-4B: EXISTING SITE PHOTOS ................................................................................................................................................ 51 FIGURE 2-4C: EXISTING SITE PHOTOS................................................................................................................................................ 53 FIGURE 2-5: GLENDORA WATER SYSTEM .......................................................................................................................................... 55 FIGURE 2-6: EXISTING RESERVOIR B................................................................................................................................................... 57 FIGURE 3-1: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN................................................................................................................................................. 63 FIGURE 3-2: RESERVOIR NGR-A....................................................................................................................................................... 65 FIGURE 3-3: RESERVOIR NGR-B........................................................................................................................................................ 67 FIGURE 3-4: ACCESS ROUTES ............................................................................................................................................................ 69 FIGURE 3-5: SLOPE GRADING PLAN .................................................................................................................................................. 71 FIGURE 3-6: RETAINING WALL .......................................................................................................................................................... 73 FIGURE 3-7: SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN............................................................................................................................. 75 FIGURE 3-8: GRADING SECTIONS...................................................................................................................................................... 77 FIGURE 3-9: DEMOLITION PLAN......................................................................................................................................................... 79 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 3 Appendix
Appendix A. Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Appendix B. Subsequent Memorandum for the Improvement of Two Access Roads Appendix C. General Biological Assessment
Appendix D. Cultural Resources Assessment
Appendix E. Geotechnical Investigation
Appendix F. Paleontological Assessment
Appendix G. Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis
Appendix H. Crotch’s Bumblebee Summary Report
Appendix I. Coastal California Gnatcatcher Report
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 4 This page intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 5 1 INTRODUCTION
This document is an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project, which involves the demolishment of an existing 0.3-million-gallon (MG) reservoir and the construction of two new 0.3 MG reservoirs on an approximately 2.0 acre site located at the northern terminus of North Glendora Avenue in the City of Glendora, California (proposed Project, Project). This IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq., and the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines).

An initial study is conducted by a lead agency to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064, an environmental impact report (EIR) must be prepared if the initial study indicates that the proposed project under review may have a potentially significant impact on the environment. A negative declaration may be prepared instead, if the lead agency prepares a written statement describing the reasons why a proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment, and, therefore, why it does not require the preparation of an EIR (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15371). According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, a negative declaration shall be prepared for a project subject to CEQA when either:
(a) The initial study shows there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, or (b) The initial study identified potentially significant effects, but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
(2) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.

If revisions are adopted into the proposed project in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15070(b), a mitigated negative declaration is prepared. This document includes such revisions in the form of mitigation measures. Therefore, this document is a Mitigated Negative Declaration and incorporates all of the elements of an initial study. Hereafter this document is referred to as an IS/MND.

This IS/MND incorporates by reference the City of Glendora General Plan Initial Study and the technical documents that relate to the proposed Project or provide additional information concerning the environmental setting of the proposed Project. The information within in this IS/MND is based on the following technical studies and/or planning documents:
• City of Glendora General Plan
(https://www.cityofglendora.org/departments/community-development/general-plan-specificplans) • City of Glendora General Plan Initial Study
(Available at 116 E Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, CA 91741) • City of Glendora Municipal Code
(https://library.qcode.us/lib/glendora_ca/pub/municipal_code) • Technical studies, personal communications, and web sites listed in Section 6, References In addition to the websites listed above, all documents are available for review at the City of Glendora, Planning Division, located at 116 E Foothill Boulevard, Glendora, CA 91741. This IS/MND serves as the environmental review for the proposed Project. The proposed Project evaluated herein involves demolition Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 6 of an existing 0.3 MG reservoir and construction of two new 0.3 MG reservoirs on an approximately 2.0- acre site located at the north end of North Glendora Avenue in the City of Glendora, California. The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density and a zoning designation of Single-Family Estate (E-7).

On October 23, 2025, the City distributed the Draft IS/MND for the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project to public agencies and the general public. In accordance with the CEQA Section 21091 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, a 30-day public review period for the Draft IS/MND was provided from October 23, 2025 to November 21, 2025. The Draft IS/MND and supporting attachments were available for review by the general public online at the City’s website (https://www.cityofglendora.gov/CityHall/Public-Notices) and at the following locations:
• Glendora City Hall, City Clerk’s Department
116 E. Foothill Boulevard
Glendora, CA 91741
• Glendora Public Library
140 Glendora Avenue
Glendora, CA 91741
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 7 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT IS/MND This memo contains responses to the comments that the City of Glendora (Lead Agency) received on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project during the public review period, which began October 23, 2025, and closed November 21, 2025 (SCH No. 2025101085). This document has been prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as amended (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.) and represents the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.

This document and the circulated IS/MND together comprise the Final IS/MND.

The following public comment was submitted to the City of Glendora during the public review period:

1. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Received November 18, 2025 (17 pages) The public comment and response to the comment are included in the public record and are available to the Lead Agency decision-makers for their review and consideration prior to making their decision. Pursuant to )CEQA Guidelines Sections 15384 and 15064, the comment received does not provide substantial evidence that the Project will have significant environmental effects which would require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. None of this new material indicates that the Project will result in a significant environmental impact or an increase in a less than significant impact previously disclosed in the North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project IS/MND.

This Response to Comments includes minor revisions to the Public Review Draft IS/MND based upon: (1) clarifications required to prepare a response to a specific comment; and/or (2) typographical errors. These revisions do not alter any impact conclusions that are disclosed in the IS/MND. Revisions to the IS/MND are outlined in Chapter 3, IS/MND Errata.

Although Public Resources Code Sections 21091(d) and 21092.5 do not require a Lead Agency to prepare written responses to comments received on a MND, the City of Glendora has elected to prepare the following written responses with the intent of conducting a comprehensive and meaningful evaluation of the proposed Project. The number designations in the responses are correlated to the bracketed and identified portions of the comment letter.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 8 Comment 1: California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Received November 18, 2025 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 9 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 10 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 11 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 12 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 13 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 14 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 15 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 16 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 17 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 18 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 19 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 20 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 21 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 22 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 23 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 24 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 25 Response to Comment Letter 1: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Comment 1.1: This comment introduces the comment letter, and states that the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has reviewed the IS/MND.

Response 1.1: This comment is introductory in nature and does not provide any substantial evidence supporting that the Project would result in reasonably foreseeable significant adverse environmental impacts not already identified, analyzed, and mitigated in the IS/MND. No further response is required.

Comment 1.2: This comment provides a summary of the CDFW’s role as California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources in the State and explains the agency’s jurisdiction over biological resources. The comment states that CDFW may need to exercise regulatory authority over the Project.

Response 1.2: This comment is introductory in nature and does not provide any substantial evidence of a significant environmental impact. Although the comment expresses general concern regarding the Project’s potential to result in significant biological impacts, the comment does not provide substantial evidence supporting such a conclusion. No further response is required.

Comment 1.3: This comment provides a summary of the Project Description for the proposed Project.

Response 1.3: The comment consists of a summary of the proposed Project and, therefore, does not require a response as no substantial environmental issues are raised.

Comment 1.4: This comment notes that the Project is located within the known range of Crotch’s bumble bee and that suitable nesting and foraging habitat may be present within the Project area. CDFW states that the IS/MND did not evaluate potential impacts to the species or include species-specific surveys, avoidance measures, or mitigation. CDFW recommended revising the biological resources analysis to address potential direct and indirect impacts to Crotch’s bumble bee, conducting focused surveys in accordance with CDFW survey protocols, and coordinating with CDFW regarding potential incidental take authorization if the species is detected. CDFW further recommended that the CEQA document include sufficient analysis and mitigation measures to support compliance with CEQA and CESA requirements.

Response 1.4: In response to this comment, the City retained a qualified biologist to conduct focused protocol-level surveys for Crotch's bumble bee throughout the entirety of the two Project parcels, including both the proposed Project impact area and the remaining portions of the parcels outside the limits of disturbance. Surveys were conducted in accordance with CDFW's Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Candidate Bumble Bee Species (CDFW 2023). Three protocol surveys were completed on April 7, April 29, and May 14, 2026, during the species' peak colony activity period and under suitable weather conditions. Survey efforts included habitat assessment, nectar source mapping, and focused surveys of areas containing suitable foraging habitat. The surveys were conducted by CDFWapproved biologists meeting the qualification requirements established by CDFW.

The survey results documented suitable nectar resources within portions of the Project site; however, no Crotch's bumble bees were detected during any of the three protocol survey rounds. Other native bumble bee species were observed, confirming that survey conditions were suitable for detecting Bombus species if present. Based on the negative survey results, the qualified biologist concluded that Crotch's bumble bee is absent from the Project site and that the Project would not result in direct or indirect impacts to the species.

Thus, because no take of a CESA-listed or candidate species would occur, an Incidental Take Permit pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2081 is not required for the Project.

The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND has been revised to include a discussion of the focused Crotch's bumble bee surveys, survey methodology, and survey results, as demonstrated in Chapter 3, Errata, of this Final IS/MND. The revisions clarify that the protocol surveys conducted in accordance with CDFW guidance did not detect Crotch's bumble bee within the Project area and that the Project would not result in take of the species and would not require avoidance or mitigation measures specific to Crotch's bumble bee.

The focused survey report has also been included in the Final IS/MND appendices.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 26 Therefore, the additional surveys and updated analysis confirm the conclusions of the IS/MND that impacts to special-status wildlife species would be less than significant with implementation of the identified mitigation measures, and no additional mitigation specific to Crotch's bumble bee is warranted.

Comment 1.5: This comment notes that the Project could impact nesting and foraging habitat for the federally listed coastal California gnatcatcher, which was identified in the IS/MND as having a low potential to occur within the Project area. The comment notes that the Project would permanently affect coastal sage scrub habitat, a habitat type used by the species, and that focused protocol surveys had not been conducted to confirm presence or absence. The comment states that vegetation removal and ground-disturbing activities could result in direct or indirect impacts to the species, including disturbance of nesting birds and loss of habitat. The comment recommended that the City further evaluate the species' potential occurrence, consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as appropriate, conduct protocol-level coastal California gnatcatcher surveys prior to ground disturbance or vegetation removal, and incorporate additional avoidance and mitigation measures if the species is determined to be present.

Response 1.5: In response to this comment, the City retained qualified biologists to conduct focused protocollevel coastal California gnatcatcher presence/absence surveys. Surveys were completed in accordance with the USFWS Coastal California Gnatcatcher Presence/Absence Survey Guidelines (USFWS 1997) for areas outside of a Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) jurisdiction. Six protocol surveys were conducted throughout suitable coastal sage scrub habitat located within the two Project parcels, including habitat both within and outside the proposed Project impact area during the 2026 breeding season between April 7 and May 30, 2026. The surveys met all applicable USFWS protocol requirements for determining species presence or absence. Survey results documented that no coastal California gnatcatchers were detected during any of the six protocol survey visits. The survey report concluded that the required number of surveys was completed and that the species is absent from the Project site. Based on the protocol survey results, coastal California gnatcatcher is not present within the Project area and would not be subject to direct or indirect impacts from Project construction or operation. Accordingly, the Project would not result in take of coastal California gnatcatcher or impacts to occupied habitat.

The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND has been revised to incorporate a discussion of the focused coastal California gnatcatcher surveys and survey results, as demonstrated in Chapter 3, Errata, of this Final IS/MND. The survey report has been included in the Final IS/MND appendices.

Therefore, because the protocol-level surveys conducted in accordance with USFWS guidelines confirmed the absence of coastal California gnatcatcher from the Project site, the City has determined that additional species-specific mitigation measures are not required. Existing mitigation measures and standard nesting bird protections remain applicable to the Project. The additional survey information supports and reinforces the IS/MND's conclusion that impacts to special-status wildlife species would be less than significant with implementation of the identified mitigation measures.

Comment 1.6: The comment notes that the IS/MND describes that vegetation removal and construction activities as part of the project would result in temporary and permanent impacts to sensitive natural communities, including Diegan coastal sage scrub and open coast live oak woodland. The comment states that the mitigation proposed in the IS/MND may not provide sufficient compensation for habitat impacts and may lack specific performance standards, success criteria, long-term monitoring requirements, and adaptive management measures necessary to demonstrate mitigation effectiveness. The comment recommends revising Mitigation Measure BIO-3 to increase the mitigation ratio for impacts to sensitive habitats, ensure it includes enforceable performance standards, success criteria, and long-term monitoring and adaptive management plan.

Response 1.6: In response to this comment, Mitigation Measure BIO-3 is updated to increase the mitigation ratio for impacts to sensitive species from 1.3:1 to 2:1 and to require that the Habitat Restoration Plan include measurable success criteria, a minimum five-year monitoring period, and adaptive management strategies to ensure restoration goals are met. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND has been Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 27 revised to incorporate the increased mitigation ratio, as demonstrated in Chapter 3, Errata, of this Final IS/MND.

Comment 1.7: This comment notes that vegetation removal, grading, demolition, and construction activities could adversely affect nesting birds through habitat loss, nest abandonment, disturbance, and reduced reproductive success. The comment states that the nesting bird mitigation measure included in the IS/MND may not provide sufficient avoidance buffers or adequately compensate for the loss of nesting and foraging habitat. The comment recommended revisions to Mitigation Measure BIO-2 to expand nesting bird survey buffers, establish species-specific avoidance distances, require notification and training of construction personnel, document survey results in a memorandum submitted to CDFW, and notify CDFW if special-status species are observed. The comment also recommends additional compensatory mitigation to address permanent habitat loss associated with the Project.

Response 1.7: In response to this comment, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 is revised to incorporate CDFW's recommended modifications. Specifically, the revised mitigation measure includes expanded survey and avoidance buffers for nesting birds, including a 150-foot buffer for common avian species, a 300-foot buffer for listed or highly sensitive species, and a 500-foot buffer for raptors. The revised measure also requires that construction personnel be informed of established buffer areas, that construction activities avoid active nests until a qualified biologist determines the nests are no longer active, that survey results be documented in a memorandum, and that CDFW be notified if special-status species are observed during surveys.

The City has also reviewed CDFW's recommendation regarding compensatory mitigation for nesting bird habitat. As revised, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 provides enhanced protection for active nests and nesting birds during Project implementation; therefore, additional compensatory mitigation is not included. Potential impacts to nesting birds would remain less than significant with the revisions to Mitigation Measure BIO-2.

The IS/MND has been revised accordingly as demonstrated in Chapter 3, Errata, of this Final IS/MND.

Comment 1.8: This comment recommends that the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) incorporate the mitigation measures and revisions identified in CDFW’s comment letter and accompanying draft MMRP.

Response 1.8: The City appreciates CDFW's recommendations regarding the MMRP. As discussed in Responses to Comments 1.6 and 1.7, the Final IS/MND has been revised to incorporate modifications to the biological mitigation measures in response to CDFW's comments. The MMRP has also been updated, as appropriate, to reflect the revised mitigation measures.

Comment: 1.9: This comment requests that any special-status species and sensitive natural communities identified during biological surveys be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and that vegetation community data be submitted to CDFW's Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program in accordance with CEQA and CDFW reporting requirements.

Response 1.9: The City acknowledges CDFW's recommendations concerning reporting of special-status species observations to the CNDDB and submission of sensitive natural community information to CDFW's Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, as applicable. The City will ensure that applicable biological data collected during implementation of the Project are submitted in accordance with CDFW's reporting requirements.

Comment 1.10: This comment notes that payment of the applicable CEQA filing fees is required upon filing the Notice of Determination because the Project may affect fish and wildlife resources. The comment also requests an opportunity to review the City's responses to comments and to receive notice of future public hearings related to the Project.

Response 1.10: The City acknowledges CDFW's comments regarding payment of the applicable CEQA filing fees and requests for future coordination. The required CDFW environmental filing fee will be paid upon filing the Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA and the Fish and Game Code. Consistent with CEQA requirements, CDFW will receive the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration, including responses to comments, and notice of the public hearing.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 28 Comment 1.11: This comment concludes the comment letter and requests that CDFW be given an opportunity to review and comment on any response that the City has to the comment letter. The comment also requests that CDFW is provided notification of any forthcoming hearing dates for the Project.

Response 1.11: The City will provide responses to CDFW’s comments and provide notification of any forthcoming hearing dates for the Project.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 29 3 ERRATA TO THE PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT IS/MND
This chapter contains revisions to the Public Review Draft IS/MND based upon: (1) clarifications required to prepare a response to a specific comment; and/or (2) typographical errors. These revisions do not alter any impact significance conclusions as disclosed in the IS/MND. Changes made to the IS/MND are identified here in strikeout text to indicate deletions and in double underlined text to signify additions.

Revisions in Response to Written Comments and Changes to Text The following text, organized by MND Chapters and Sections, has been revised in response to comments received on the IS/MND and corrections identified by the City.

5.4 Biological Resources
Threshold response a) on Pages 62-63, Section 5.4, Biological Resources, is revised as follows:

Sensitive Wildlife Species
Table BIO-2 shows the 10 special-wildlife plant species that have been reported to historically or presently occur within three miles of the Project site. During the field survey, one special-status wildlife species was identified in the Study Area: Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow. The coastal California gnatcatcher was determined to have a low potential for occurrence. Pallid bat and western mastiff bat were determined to be absent for nursery roosts, with the pallid bat having a low potential to forage and western mastiff bat having a moderate potential to forage within the Project impact areas. Big free-tailed bat was determined to have a low potential for roosting and foraging. All other special-status species evaluated for the Project are presumed absent. There were no narrow endemic, federal or state-listed wildlife species observed within the Survey Area.

Following circulation of the MND, comments received from the CDFW identified the potential for Crotch's bumble bee (Bombus crotchii), a California Endangered Species Act candidate species, to occur within the Project area. In response, focused protocol-level surveys were conducted by qualified biologists in accordance with CDFW's Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Candidate Bumble Bee Species (CDFW 2023). The surveys were conducted throughout the entirety of the two Project parcels, including both the proposed Project impact area and the remaining portions of the parcels outside the limits of disturbance. Three surveys were conducted on April 7, April 29, and May 14, 2026, during the species' peak colony activity period. Suitable nectar resources were identified within portions of the Project site and surveyed; however, no Crotch's bumble bees were detected during any of the three survey events.

Other native bumble bee species were observed during the surveys, confirming that survey conditions were suitable for detecting Bombus species if present. Based on the focused survey results, Crotch's bumble bee is considered absent from the Project site and would not be impacted by Project implementation. Therefore, no mitigation measures or Incidental Take Permit pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2081 are required for Crotch's bumble bee. The focused survey report is included in Appendix H.

Following circulation of the MND, comments received from CDFW also identified the need for protocol-level surveys for the federally threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica). In response, focused presence/absence surveys were conducted by qualified biologists in accordance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Coastal California Gnatcatcher Presence/Absence Survey Guidelines (USFWS 1997) for areas outside of a Natural Community Conservation Plan jurisdiction. Six protocol surveys were conducted throughout suitable coastal sage scrub habitat located within the two Project parcels, including habitat both within and outside the proposed Project impact area between April 7 and May 30, 2026, during the 2026 breeding season. Approximately 5.15 acres of suitable coastal sage scrub habitat were surveyed. No coastal California gnatcatchers were detected during any of the six survey visits. Based on the protocol survey results, coastal California gnatcatcher is considered absent from the Project site and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 30 would not be impacted by Project implementation. Therefore, no additional species-specific mitigation measures are required. The focused coastal California gnatcatcher survey report is included in Appendix I.

Table BIO-2: Potentially Occurring Wildlife Species
Species Name Potential for
Occurrence
Arroyo chub (Gila orcuttii) Absent
Big free-tailed bat (Nyctinomops macrotis) Low
Coast range newt (Taricha torosa) Absent
Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica
californica)
Low Absent
(protocol surveys
conducted in 2026)
Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)
Absent (nursery
roosts), Low
(foraging)
Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimophila
ruficeps canescens)
Present
Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) Absent Two-striped gartersnake (Thamnophis hammondii) Absent
Western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus)
Absent (nursery
roots), Moderate
(foraging)
Western yellow bat (Lasiurus xanthinus)
Absent (nursery
roosts and
foraging)
Crotch’s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii)
Absent (protocol
surveys conducted
in 2026)
Mitigation Measure BIO-2 on Pages 66-67, Section 5.4, Biological Resources, is revised as follows:

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Conduct Vegetation Clearing/Initial Grading Outside of the Bird Nesting Season OR Conduct Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Surveys. Project construction and grading plans shall state that ground-disturbing and vegetation-clearing activities should occur outside of the breeding season (February 15 – September 15). If vegetation removal or initial grading occurs during the breeding season, nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist for nesting raptors and migratory birds and within an additional 150-foot buffer for common avian species, 300 feet for listed or highly sensitive species, and 500 feet for raptors 100-foot survey buffer (for passerines) and 300-foot buffer for raptors within 3 days of construction. If nests of listed birds, migratory birds, raptors, or other sensitive species are documented, active nests will be avoided, and a nest buffer will be designated around each nest. Nest buffers will be determined at the discretion of the qualified biologist based on the location and species occupying the nest. Species that are not covered by the MBTA (such as European starling, house sparrow, Eurasian collared dove, etc.) will not require a nest buffer. The perimeter of this nest buffer will be clearly demarcated, and all construction activities will be prohibited within the delineated area until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest has either successfully fledged, been depredated, or failed due to other causes. Construction activities may proceed within the non-disturbance buffer if a qualified biologist is present to monitor active nests and determines that construction activities are not causing indirect or direct disturbance to a nest. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and instructed to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. Construction activities shall avoid any active nests and buffer zones until a qualified biologist has verified that the young have fledged or the nest has otherwise become inactive. A memorandum shall be prepared at the conclusion of surveys and submitted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 31 to CDFW. The memorandum shall include graphics and figures as necessary to support the results of the survey. CDFW shall be notified if/when any special status species is observed onsite.

Mitigation Measure BIO-3 on Page 67, Section 5.4, Biological Resources, is revised as follows:

Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Restore Temporary Impact Areas. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall have a qualified biologist prepare a Habitat Restoration Plan that will detail requirements for mitigating impacts to Open Coast Live Oak Woodland [CLOW] and Diegan Coastal Sage scrub [DCSS], deemed sensitive within the Glendora Community Plan. The plan will require that temporary impact areas are restored with native vegetation to include plant species currently found on site and will be maintained until the vegetation is self-sustaining without supplemental irrigation or additional planting.

Temporary impact areas containing sensitive (DCSS and CLOW) and non-sensitive habitat types (Coastal Sage – Chaparral Transition [CSCT] and Flat-topped Buckwheat Scrub [FTBS]), shall be restored/enhanced with DCSS and CLOW to provide mitigation ratio of sensitive habitat 2:1 1.3:1 ratio. Total vegetation cover should be equal to or greater than pre-construction levels. Nonnative species shall not be used during restoration planting. Weed species within the restoration area shall be controlled until the site is adequately restored per the requirements outlined in the CRP. The Habitat Restoration Plan shall also include measurable success criteria, a minimum five-year monitoring period, and adaptive management strategies to ensure restoration goals are met.
7 References
Pages 117 through 118 will be revised as follows:

Blackhawk Environmental. (June 2023). North Glendora Water Tank Project Biological Letter Report.

Appendix C.

BFSA Environmental Services. (January 12, 2023). Cultural Resources Study for the North Glendora Water Tank Project. Appendix D.

BFSA Environmental Services. (September 12, 2022). Paleontological Assessment for the North Glendora Water Tank Project. Appendix F.

California Department of Conservation. (2022). California Important Farmland Finder. California Department of Conservation. Accessed from: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ California Employment Development Department. (February 2023). Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places. Accessed: https://labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/laborforce-and-unemployment-for-cities-and-census-areas.html California Department of Conservation. (n.d.). CGS Information Warehouse: Mineral Land Classification/SMARA Maps and Reports. Accessed March 30, 2023. Available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mineralresources/
California Department of Conservation. (2015). Fault Activity Map of California. Accessed from:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. (June 6, 2023). Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Candidate Bumble Bee Species. Retrieved June 10, 2026, from https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=213150&inline California Department of Transportation. (2018). California State Scenic Highway System Map. Accessed from:

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 32 https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e805 7116f1aacaa
California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. (2025). Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Accessed from:
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/firehazard-severity-zones CalRecycle. (2025). SWIS Facility/Site Activities - Scholl Canyon Landfill (19-AA-0012). Accessed:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Index/1000 CalRecycle. (n.d.). Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Accessed from https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates City of Glendora. (March 2018). Urban Forestry Manual. Accessed from:
https://www.cityofglendora.org/departments-services/parks-recreation-senior-services/parkstrees-division City of Glendora. (June 2021). 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed from:
https://www.cityofglendora.org/home/showdocument?id=27970&t=637611779184347536 City of Glendora. (2006). Community Plan 2025. Accessed from:
https://www.cityofglendora.org/departments/community-development/general-plan-specificplans City of Glendora. (2006). Glendora 2006 General Plan Initial Study.

City of Glendora. (January 2025). Glendora, California Municipal Code. Accessed from:
https://library.qcode.us/lib/glendora_ca/pub/municipal_code Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). (2025). EnviroStor. Accessed:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
Huffman Environmental. (June 2026a). 2026 Proposed Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project Crotch’s Bumblebee Summary Report, Los Angeles County, California. Appendix H.

Huffman Environmental. (June 2026b). Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project Coastal California Gnatcatcher Report. Appendix I.

Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Commission. (2015). Bracket Field Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.

Accessed: https://planning.lacounty.gov/brackett/documents EPD Solutions. (October 12, 2023). Subsequent Memorandum for the Improvement of Two Access Roads for the Proposed North Glendora Water Tank Project. Appendix B.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (n.d.). Flood Map Center. Accessed from:
https://msc.fema.gov/portal
Kohler, S.L. 2010. Update of Mineral Land Classification for Portland Cement Concrete-Grade Aggregate in the San Gabriel Valley Production-Consumption Region, Los Angeles County, California - Special Report 209 - Plate 1.

LSA (May 15, 2023a). Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum for the Proposed North Glendora Water Tank Project in the City of Glendora, California. Appendix A.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 33 LSA (May 25, 2023b). Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Appendix G.

Ninyo & Moore. (May 5, 2023). Updated Geotechnical Evaluation North Reservoirs 19BR and 19C Replacement Project, City of Glendora. Appendix E.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (1997). Coastal California Gnatcatcher Presence/Absence Survey Guidelines. Retrieved June 10, 2026, from
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/survey-protocol-for-coastal-californiagnatcatcher.pdf Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 34 4 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that when a public agency completes an environmental document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt a reporting and monitoring plan. This requirement ensures that environmental impacts found to be significant will be mitigated. The reporting and monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21081.6).

In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, Table 4-1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting, has been prepared for the proposed North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project. The table identifies Plans, Programs, and Policies (PPPs) and Mitigation Measures (MMs) required by the City to mitigate or avoid significant adverse impacts associated with the implementation of the Project. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist is intended to provide verification that all applicable mitigation measures relative to significant environmental impacts are monitored and reported. Monitoring will include: 1) verification that each mitigation measure has been implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation measure; and 3) retention of records in the City’s Project file.

This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) delineates responsibilities for monitoring the Project, but also allows the City flexibility and discretion in determining how best to monitor implementation.

Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation measure. Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation measures were implemented.

This includes the review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition, unless otherwise noted in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist (Table 4-1). If an adopted mitigation measure is not being properly implemented, the designated monitoring personnel shall require corrective actions to ensure adequate implementation.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 35 Table 4-1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures and Plans, Policies or Programs (PPPs) Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials

AIR QUALITY
PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402. The Project shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

Compliance with Rule
403. During construction.

City of Glendora Planning
Division
PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following:
• All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions.
• The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather; preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day.
• The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less.

Compliance with Rule
402. During construction.

City of Glendora Planning
Division
PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only “Low-Volatile Organic Compounds” paints (no more than 50 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications shall be used.

Compliance with Rule
1113. During construction.

City of Glendora Planning
Division

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Delineation of Project Impact Areas. Prior to the commencement of ground disturbing activities, the boundaries of proposed Project impact areas shall be clearly delineated with stakes, fencing or other conspicuous boundary markings, which will be maintained until the completion of construction activities, to prevent the unauthorized impact of habitat outside of Boundaries of work area
to be delineated. Prior to
commencement of ground
disturbing activities.

City of Glendora Planning
Division
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 36 Mitigation Measures and Plans, Policies or Programs (PPPs) Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
Project impact areas discussed in this report. All employees shall be instructed that their activities, vehicles, equipment and construction materials are restricted to the proposed Project footprint.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Conduct Vegetation Clearing/Initial Grading Outside of the Bird Nesting Season OR Conduct Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Surveys. Project construction and grading plans shall state that grounddisturbing and vegetation-clearing activities should occur outside of the breeding season (February 15 – September 15). If vegetation removal or initial grading occurs during the breeding season, nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist for nesting raptors and migratory birds and within an additional 150-foot buffer for common avian species, 300 feet for listed or highly sensitive species, and 500 feet for raptors within 3 days of construction. If nests of listed birds, migratory birds, raptors, or other sensitive species are documented, active nests will be avoided, and a nest buffer will be designated around each nest. Nest buffers will be determined at the discretion of the qualified biologist based on the location and species occupying the nest. The perimeter of this nest buffer will be clearly demarcated, and all construction activities will be prohibited within the delineated area until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest has either successfully fledged, been depredated, or failed due to other causes. Construction activities may proceed within the nondisturbance buffer if a qualified biologist is present to monitor active nests and determines that construction activities are not causing indirect or direct disturbance to a nest. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and instructed to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. Construction activities shall avoid any active nests and buffer zones until a qualified biologist has verified that the young have fledged or the nest has otherwise become inactive. A memorandum shall be prepared at the conclusion of surveys and submitted to CDFW. The memorandum shall include graphics and figures as necessary to support the results of the survey. CDFW shall be notified if/when any special status species is observed onsite.

Conduct nesting bird
surveys within three days
of construction if
vegetation removal occurs
during nesting bird season
(February 15 –
September 15).

Qualified biologist and
City of Glendora Planning
Division.

Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Restore Temporary Impact Areas. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall have a qualified biologist prepare a Habitat Restoration Plan that will detail requirements for mitigating impacts to Open Coast Live Oak Woodland [CLOW] and Diegan Coastal Sage scrub [DCSS], deemed sensitive within the Glendora Community Plan. The plan will require that temporary impact areas are restored with native vegetation to include plant species currently found on site and will be maintained Preparation of a Habitat
Restoration Plan. Prior to
the issuance of a grading
permit.

Qualified biologist and
City of Glendora Planning
Division.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 37 Mitigation Measures and Plans, Policies or Programs (PPPs) Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
until the vegetation is self-sustaining without supplemental irrigation or additional planting. Temporary impact areas containing sensitive (DCSS and CLOW) and non-sensitive habitat types (Coastal Sage – Chaparral Transition [CSCT] and Flat-topped Buckwheat Scrub [FTBS]), shall be restored/enhanced with DCSS and CLOW to provide mitigation ratio of sensitive habitat 2:1 1.3:1 ratio. Total vegetation cover should be equal to or greater than pre-construction levels.

Nonnative species shall not be used during restoration planting. Weed species within the restoration area shall be controlled until the site is adequately restored per the requirements outlined in the CRP. The Habitat Restoration Plan shall also include measurable success criteria, a minimum five-year monitoring period, and adaptive management strategies to ensure restoration goals are met.

CULTURAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Inadvertent Discoveries. Prior to the issuance of any permits for ground-disturbing activities that cause excavation of soils (including as grading, excavation, and trenching), the City of Glendora shall ensure that all Project grading and construction plans include specifications stating that in the event that potential cultural or archaeological resources are discovered during excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall cease within 60 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist from the City or County List of Qualified Archaeologists has evaluated the find to determine whether the find constitutes a “unique archaeological resource,” as defined in Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code. Work on the other portions of the Project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Any resources identified shall be treated in accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g).

Additionally, as detailed within Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-4, both the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (YSMN) and Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall be contacted regarding any tribal cultural resources finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

In grading and
construction plans. Prior to
issuance of any permits
for ground-disturbing
activities.

City of Glendora Planning
Division / Qualified
Archaeologist
PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Should human remains or funerary objects be discovered during project construction, the project would be required to comply with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which states that no further disturbance may occur in the vicinity of the body (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition In grading and
construction plans. During
construction.

City of Glendora Planning
Division
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 38 Mitigation Measures and Plans, Policies or Programs (PPPs) Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine the identity of and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must complete the inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site.

HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY
PPP WQ-1: SWPPP. Prior to grading permit issuance, the project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer) pursuant to the Municipal Code Chapter

21.03.090(K). The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements to limit the potential of polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Glendora staff or its designee to confirm compliance.

Preparation, review and
approval of a SWPPP.

Prior to issuance of
grading permit.

City of Glendora Building
Department / Qualified
SWPPP Developer

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation. The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Department (YSMN) shall be contacted, as detailed in CUL-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during Project implementation and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resource Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with YSMN, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents YSMN for the remainder of the project, should YSMN elect to place a monitor onsite.

Tribe contact. Upon
cultural resource
discovery.

Development of a CRMP.

The find is deemed
significant.

City of Glendora Planning
Division
Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Dissemination to YSMN. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of construction of the Project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to YSMN. The Lead Submit all project-related
archaeological/cultural
documents to YSMN. City
City of Glendora Planning
Division
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 39 Mitigation Measures and Plans, Policies or Programs (PPPs) Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with YSMN throughout the life of the Project.
and tribe. Following
preparation.

Mitigation Measure TCR-3: Retain a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities.
a. The Project Applicant/Lead Agency shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. The monitor shall be retained prior to the commencement of any “ground-disturbing activity” for the Project at all Project locations (i.e., both on-site and any off-site locations that are included in the Project description/definition and/or required in connection with the Project, such as public improvement work). “Ground-disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.
b. A copy of the executed monitoring agreement shall be submitted to the Lead Agency prior to the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity, or the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a grounddisturbing activity. c. The monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground-disturbing activities, the type of construction activities performed, locations of ground-disturbing activities, soil types, cultural-related materials, and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc., (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be provided to the Project Applicant/Lead Agency upon written request to the Tribe.

On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a designated point of contact for the Project Applicant/Lead Agency that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the Project site or in connection with the Project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Kizh to the Project Applicant/Lead Agency that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the Project site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs
Retain a Native American
Monitor.

Prior to the
commencement of grounddisturbing activities.

City of Glendora Planning
Division
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 40 Mitigation Measures and Plans, Policies or Programs (PPPs) Action and Timing Responsible for
Ensuring Compliance /
Verification
Date Completed
and Initials
TCR-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resource Objects (NonFunerary/Non-Ceremonial). Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 60 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist. The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.

Halt construction within at
least 60 feet of find.

Upon discovery of any
tribal cultural resources.

City of Glendora Planning
Division
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 41 5 FINAL IS/MND

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

PROJECT LOCATION
The Project site is located in the northeastern portion of the City of Glendora, situated within the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains overlooking the San Gabriel Valley to the south. The Project site is located on two adjacent lots on the northerly end of North Glendora Avenue and includes portions of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 8636-015-902 and -020. Regional access to the Project site is provided via State Route 39 (SR 39) and Interstate 210 (I-210). Local access is provided via North Glendora Avenue. The Project site and surrounding area is shown in Figure 2-1, Regional Location, and Figure 2-2, Local Vicinity.

EXISTING PROJECT SITE
The approximately 2.0-acre Project site contains an approximately 0.3-million-gallon (MG) (or 260,000 gallons) reservoir and associated infrastructure located on a concrete pad. The concrete pad is reinforced with an approximately 2-foot-tall concrete masonry unit (CMU) retaining wall along the north and west side.

Additionally, a 5-foot-tall chain link fence surrounds the reservoir and pad. Beyond the existing pad, the site consists of exposed dirt and some ruderal vegetation and trees around the perimeter. A 10-foot-wide paved road provides access to the reservoir from North Glendora Avenue. Two antenna towers, a limited power (LP) panel, and a Programmable Logic Controller/Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (PLC/SCADA) panel are located south of the existing reservoir. This equipment is used to transmit live data regarding water levels in the reservoir to the City.

Approximately 150 feet southwest of the reservoir is an existing residence which is currently vacant and unoccupied but owned and maintained by the City. Additionally, approximately 300 feet southeast of the reservoir, there is an additional occupied private residence. Existing surrounding land uses include rural residential development, associated ornamental vegetation and roadways surrounded by expansive native habitat. The Project site’s existing conditions are shown in Figure 2-3, Aerial and Figure 2-4a-c, Site Photos.

GLENDORA’S WATER SYSTEM
The City of Glendora’s water service area covers approximately 11 square miles, which encompasses the majority of the City of Glendora and a portion of the Cities of San Dimas, Azusa, and an unincorporated portion of Los Angeles County, as shown in Figure 2-5, Glendora Water System.

The Project site is within pressure zone 3A (Glencoe) (previously known as Zone 19) which generally includes the area north of Palm Drive and west of North Easley Canyon Road and a small, noncontiguous area along Glencoe Heights Drive north of the westerly extension of Cavan Lane. A pressure zone is an area of service supplied by a source or several sources that provides a constant hydraulic gradient. Water supply to Zone 3A is provided by the Glencoe Pump Station located southwesterly of the intersection of North Live Oak Avenue and East Palm Drive.

Zone 3A has three reservoirs: Glencoe A, Glencoe B and North Glendora B. Glencoe A and B are located at the north end of Glencoe Heights Drive and have volumes of 0.125 MG and 0.12 MG, respectively. North Glendora B (North Glendora Reservoir, NGR, or Reservoir B) is located at the northerly end of Glendora Avenue and has an approximate volume of 0.3 MG. Reservoir B provides service to the City’s water customers for municipal purposes throughout the reservoir’s approximately 156-acre service area.

EXISTING WATER TANK
Reservoir B is a 0.3 MG above-ground bolted steel reservoir that was constructed in 1998. Reservoir B has a diameter of 47.5 feet, a shell height of 24 feet, and an approximate bottom elevation of 1,390 feet Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 42 above mean seal level (amsl). NGR’s approximate overflow elevation is 1,412 feet amsl. The reservoir has an 8-inch diameter common inlet-outlet pipe with its centerline 18-inches above the tank bottom which allows water to enter and leave the reservoir. Figure 2-6, Existing Reservoir B, illustrates the existing reservoir.

It is reported that the tank has been leaking for some time. In 2014 the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Division of Drinking Water’s (DDW) conducted a sanitary survey of the tank which identified streams of water running down the side of the tank, water streaks and rust on the bolts. Following the 2014 sanitary survey, the City was asked to address these problems by DDW.

A Sanitary Survey was conducted by DDW in 2018 which indicated that past repair efforts have not been successful and directed the City to refurbish or replace the tank as soon as possible. An additional Sanitary Survey was conducted by DDW in 2021 which requested the City submit a corrective action plan to SWRCB DDW with a schedule for the reservoir’s replacement.

SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density and a zoning designation of SingleFamily Estate (E-7). Approximately 100 feet south of the existing reservoir is a vacant single-family residence that is owned and maintained by the City. Approximately 270 feet southwest of the existing reservoir is an occupied single-family residence that is privately owned. Land uses surrounding the Project site are further described in Table 1.

Table 1: Surrounding Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations Existing Land Use General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation
North
Undeveloped land, foothills
of the San Gabriel
Mountains
Low Density Single Family
Estates (E-7)
South Single-Family Residence Low Density Single Family Estates (E-7)
West
Undeveloped land, foothills
of the San Gabriel
Mountains
Low Density Single Family
Estates (E-7)
East
Single-Family Residence
followed by foothills of the
San Gabriel Mountains
Low Density Single Family
Estates (E-7)
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 43 Figure 2-1: Regional Location
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 44 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 45 Figure 2-2: Local Vicinity
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 46 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 47 Figure 2-3: Aerial
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 48 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 49 Figure 2-4a: Existing Site Photos
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 50 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 51 Figure 2-4b: Existing Site Photos
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 52 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 53 Figure 2-4c: Existing Site Photos
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 54 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 55 Figure 2-5: Glendora Water System
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 56 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 57 Figure 2-6: Existing Reservoir B
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 58 This page is intentionally left blank.

Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 59 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

INTRODUCTION
The North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project (Project, proposed Project) involves the following components on the 2.0-acre Project site: 1) site preparation and grading of a new pad to the west of the existing reservoir pad, 2) construction of new 0.3 MG reservoir (NGR-A), 3) demolition of the existing bolted steel reservoir (North Glendora B [previously known as Reservoir 19B]), and 4) construction of second 0.3 MG reservoir (NGR-B) at approximately the same location as reservoir B. Additional improvements would include construction of inlet/outlet pipelines, overflow and bottom drain pipelines, and widening of the existing reservoir access road. Figure 3-1, Conceptual Site Plan, illustrates the site plan as proposed.

PROJECT FEATURES
Overview
The purpose of the proposed Project is to replace the existing bolted steel North Glendora Reservoir with two new welded steel tanks in order to provide the storage required (operational, fire flow, and emergency) for Zone 3A, with consideration of outage of any of the zone’s reservoirs or Glencoe Pump Station. The Project would operate two new 323,000-gallon reservoirs each with usable volumes of 242,368 gallons for a total usable capacity of approximately 484,736 gallons. The reservoirs would discharge into City potable water lines and provide service to the City’s water customers for municipal purposes throughout the reservoir’s approximately 156-acre service area. Operation of the reservoirs would provide increased reliability for existing water customers within the 156-acre service area. Operation would require intermittent maintenance servicing.

Water Tanks
Reservoir NGR-A
Reservoir A would be constructed west of the existing reservoir on a reinforced concrete ring foundation with a 6-inch-thick oiled sand bed inside as shown in Figure 3-2, Reservoir NGR-A. The reservoir would be a welded steel structure per American Water Works Association standards (AWWA D100-21) and would sit over approximately two feet of crushed rock. All materials in contact with the water would be National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) 61 certified, consistent with AWWA D102-21. The reservoir would have a diameter of 50 feet and a height of 28 feet. The total usable volume in the reservoir would be approximately 242,368 gallons.

A 12-inch diameter ductile iron inlet-outlet pipe (DIP) would be constructed on the side of the proposed reservoir. The 12-inch DIP would tie into to the City’s water system via a proposed 12-inch water line that would be constructed within the access road.

Reservoir NGR-B
Reservoir NGR-B would be identical to Reservoir NGR-A and constructed in approximately the same place as Reservoir B as shown in Figure 3-3, Reservoir NGR-B. Reservoir NGR-B would have a diameter of 50 feet and a height of 28 feet. The total usable volume in the reservoir would be approximately 242,368 gallons.

Reservoir NGR-B would include a 12-inch diameter DIP that would connect to the proposed 12-inch water line that would be constructed within the access road. Additionally, reservoir NGR-B would include a connection to the 12-inch diameter PVC drainpipe off reservoir NGR-A, which would allow runoff to outlet to the existing grouted riprap outlet on the east side of the site.

Site Access and Maintenance
During construction, the site would be accessed using either North Easley Canyon Road or North Glendora Road as shown in Figure 3-4, Access Routes. Further, in order to facilitate ease of access at the Project site, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 60 a small portion (approximately 270 feet) of the existing 10-foot-wide reservoir access road would be widened to 12 feet. Additionally, in order to utilize North Easley Canyon Road, vegetation along the roadway would need to be trimmed to accommodate large construction equipment.

During Project operation, maintenance vehicles would utilize North Glendora Road to access the site. Access to the reservoirs would be provided via a proposed 14.5-foot-wide paved road that would surround the reservoirs. The pad would gently slope to the middle of the road around the reservoir to prevent water pooling. It is anticipated that public works would access site approximately once a week in the morning to collect residuals.

Additionally, an access easement is proposed on APN 8636-015-020 in order to allow maintenance to access the reservoir site when needed.

Offsite Improvements
Prior to construction of the proposed Project, the proposed access roads would need to be improved in order to maneuver the load of construction equipment travelling to and from the site. Improvements to North Glendora Avenue would consist of widening portions of the 5,280-foot-long roadway to 12.5 feet wide.

Improvements to Easley Canyon Road would consist of widening an 800-foot-long portion of the roadway to 14 feet wide.

Prior to these roadway improvements, the City would notify affected residents of the work to be done.

Additionally, the City would be required to acquire any access easements that may be needed to perform the roadway improvements.

Fencing and Walls
The Project would remove the existing 5-foot-tall chain link fence that surrounds the perimeter of the existing reservoir pad and construct a new 6-foot-high chain link fence around the perimeter of the reservoir pad.

Additionally, the widening of the access road would require the construction of an approximately two feet tall retaining wall along the west side of the road. Further, in order to reduce the amount of grading and disturbance of the natural slopes, a retaining wall up to 12 feet in height above the pad would be constructed along the north, west, and southwest sides of the pad.

Additional Improvements
The existing antennas and electrical equipment located south of the existing reservoir would be relocated to the southwest corner of the newly constructed pad. Electric service would be provided via the single-phase pole mounted meter to provide power to reservoir tank mixers, site lighting, security camera system, instrumentation, intrusion alarms, PLC/SCADA system, and the gate controller. Additionally, the Project would include a 10kW diesel generator and an automatic transfer switch to provide power to the reservoirs during power outages.

The new reservoirs would be connected to the City’s water system via a new 12-inch water line that would be constructed within the access road. The 12-inch water line would tie into the City’s water system via a connection to the existing 8-inch water line at the southern end of the access road.

CONSTRUCTION PHASES
Phase I
Phase I of the proposed Project includes site preparation, grading, construction of the extended pad, and construction of reservoir NGR-A. Phase I would begin with removal of the existing CMU retaining wall, chain link fence, and relocation of the existing antenna towers, LP panel and PLC/SCADA panel to the southwest portion of the extended pad. Additionally, during this process, a temporary power, PLC/SCADA panel, and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 61 antenna system would be installed in the southern portion of the existing pad to continuously monitor and control all existing reservoir equipment during construction.

Following removal of the above components, the northerly and westerly hillsides of the site would be graded at a slope of 1 vertical to 1.5 horizontal from the pad, as shown on Figure 3-5, Slope Grading Plan. Grading would extend approximately 130 feet from the pad up to an elevation of approximately 1,480 feet amsl.

During this time, a 12-foot-high retaining wall would also be constructed along the north, west and southeast sides of the pad, as shown in Figure 3-6, Retaining Wall.

Site runoff would be collected in grated inlets and would flow into a 12-inch diameter PVC drainpipe, which would outlet to the existing grouted riprap outlet on the east side of the site. Site grading and drainage and grading sections are shown in Figure 3-7, Site Grading and Drainage Plan, and Figure 3-8, Grading Sections.

A permanent standby diesel generator and automatic transfer switch, electrical distribution panel and PLC/SCADA panel would be constructed in the southern corner of the pad.

Following completion of construction, the finished reservoir would be tested and placed into service.

Phase II
Demolition of Reservoir B
The proposed Project includes demolition of the existing 0.3 MG bolted steel water reservoir (B) including its foundation, abandonment of the eight-inch diameter inlet-outlet pipe and closing of the existing gate valve. The demolition of Reservoir B is illustrated in Figure 3-9, Demolition Plan.

Construction of Reservoir NGR-B
A new 0.3 MG welded steel reservoir mirroring the new reservoir NGR-A would be constructed at approximately the same location as the demolished reservoir B, as shown in Figure 3-3, Reservoir NGR-B.

Following completion of construction, Reservoir NGR-B would be tested and placed into service.

Construction Equipment & Timeline
Equipment to be used for demolition activities would include a crane, welding machine, skip loader, excavator, and an air compressor. Truck trips and construction-worker vehicular trips would also occur during construction. Approximately seven to ten construction workers would be present on the Project site on any given day. The construction lay down area would be located approximately 300 feet south of the reservoir area.

Construction activities for the Project would occur over two phases and include demolition, site preparation, grading, construction, and coating. Grading work of soils is expected to result in cut of 9,500 cubic yards (CY) and fill of 1,000 CY of soils for a net export of 8,500 CY of soils. Construction is expected to occur over 22 months and would occur within the hours allowable by Glendora Municipal Code Section 9.44.110, which states that construction shall occur only between the hours of 9.00 p.m. of one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day. However, construction hours for the proposed Project would be limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday) between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.

Project construction would take approximately 22 months, assuming the following phases:

Table 2: Construction Schedule
Activity Length of Time
Mobilization and access road improvements 3 months
Site preparation and grading 5 months
Construction of Reservoir NGR-A 5 months
Connect Reservoir NGR-A to city’s water system 1 month
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 62 Demolition of Reservoir B 1 month
Construction of Reservoir NGR-B 5 months
Connect Reservoir NGR-B to city’s water system 2 months

DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS
The following discretionary approvals, permits, and studies are anticipated to be necessary for the implementation of the proposed Project:

City of Glendora
• Development Plan Review
• Adoption of this Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Approvals and permits necessary to execute the proposed Project, including but not limited to, grading permit, building permit, etc.

Other Agencies
This IS/MND would also provide environmental information to responsible agencies and other public agencies that may be required to grant approvals or coordinate with the City of Glendora as part of Project implementation. These agencies include, but are not limited to the following:
• State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
63 Figure 3-1: Conceptual Site Plan
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
64 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
65 Figure 3-2: Reservoir NGR-A
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
66 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
67 Figure 3-3: Reservoir NGR-B
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
68 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
69 Figure 3-4: Access Routes
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
70 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
71 Figure 3-5: Slope Grading Plan
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
72 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
73 Figure 3-6: Retaining Wall
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
74 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
75 Figure 3-7: Site Grading and Drainage Plan
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
76 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
77 Figure 3-8: Grading Sections
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
78 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
79 Figure 3-9: Demolition Plan
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora for the Industrial Parkway Project
80 This page is intentionally left blank.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 81 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST

BACKGROUND
Date: November 2023
Project Title:

North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project
Lead Agency:

City of Glendora,
116 E Foothill Blvd
Glendora, CA 91741
Lead Agency Contact:

Maliha Ansari, P.E.

City of Glendora, Public Works & Engineering
[email protected]
(626) 914-8294
Project Location:

The 2.0-acre Project site is located in the northeastern portion of the City of Glendora on two adjacent lots (includes portions of APNs 8636-015-902 and -020) on the northerly end of North Glendora Avenue.

Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

City of Glendora
116 E Foothill Blvd
Glendora, CA 91741
General Plan and Zoning Designation:

The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density and a zoning designation of Single-Family Estate (E-7).

Project Description:

The City of Glendora Public Works Division is requesting funding from the City of Glendora City Council to replace an existing 0.3 MG reservoir with two new 0.3 MG reservoirs on the 2.0-acre Project site.

Additional improvements would include construction of inlet/outlet pipelines, overflow and bottom drain pipelines, and widening of the existing reservoir access road. Figure 6, Conceptual Site Plan, illustrates the site plan as proposed.

Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required:

State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 82 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below ( ) would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” or “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 83 DETERMINATION:
(To be completed by the Lead Agency) on the basis of this initial evaluation I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Signature Date
____________________________________________________________________________________ Printed Name For

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question.

A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 84 substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Negative Declaration: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from “Earlier Analysis,” as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(d). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
(a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. (b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
(c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The analysis of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 85 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This section provides evidence to substantiate the conclusions in the environmental checklist.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public
Resources Code Section 21099 would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its surroundings? (public
views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is
in an urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than Significant Impact. A substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista would occur if the vista was screened from view, the access to a formerly available public viewing position was blocked, or visual resources were obstructed by view or access to them. The Glendora General Plan does not designate any scenic vistas or protected viewsheds. However, the San Gabriel Mountains and foothills are important scenic resources within the City.

The Project site is surrounded by the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, east and west and residential uses to the south. The residential uses immediately south of the site are situated at a lower elevation than the existing reservoir. The existing reservoir has a diameter of 47.5 feet and a height of 24 feet. The Project consists of the construction of two new welded steel reservoirs that would be 50 feet in diameter and 28 feet in height. The reservoirs would be constructed on an extended pad in approximately the same location as the existing reservoir. As shown in Figures 4a-c, Existing Site Photos, views of the Project site from the residential uses to the south are obstructed by vegetation and large ornamental trees on the Project site. Thus, views of and from the Project site would be similar to existing.

Additionally, the top of the proposed reservoirs would sit at an approximate elevation of 1,412 feet amsl while the nearest residence to the south sits at approximately 1,355 feet amsl. Because the proposed reservoirs would be situated behind the existing residences and at a higher elevation than the residences, Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 86 the reservoirs would not obstruct long distance views into the valley from the residences. Therefore, the Project would not impact any scenic vistas or protected viewsheds and impacts would be less than significant. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. The Project site is not near to, nor visible from, any state scenic highways. The closest State Scenic Highway to the Project site is State Route 39 located approximately 2.5 miles west. Due to the topography of the San Gabriel Mountains, the Project site is not visible from SR-39. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings, within a state scenic highway. No impact would occur. c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within the City of Glendora and has a land use designation of LDR. The Project site lies within the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and is surrounded by rural residential development, associated ornamental vegetation and roadways surrounded by expansive native habitat, all of which is also designated as LDR.

The visual character of the Project site and surrounding areas is shown in Figure 3, Aerial View and Figures 4a-c, Existing Site Photos. As shown, the Project area is dominated by few residential homes and vegetation consisting of grasses, shrubs, and trees. The Project site itself consists of an existing reservoir on concrete pad, a 5-foot-tall chain link fence and some ruderal vegetation with trees around the perimeter.

Proposed reservoir NGR-A would be constructed west of the existing reservoir while reservoir NGR-B would be constructed at approximately the same location as the existing reservoir. Both new reservoirs (NGR-B and NGR-A) would exhibit a diameter of 50 feet and a height of 28 feet. As discussed above, the height of the proposed reservoirs is similar to the existing reservoir which is 24 feet in height. Additionally, similar to the existing reservoir, materials used for the proposed reservoirs would be neutrally toned and would blend the site with the surrounding residences. Thus, implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially alter the character of Project site from existing conditions.

The proposed Project would not substantially degrade the visual quality and character of the site and its surroundings. Because of the nature of the proposed Project and its compatibility with the current use of the site, visual impacts associated with development of the proposed Project would be less than significant. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant Impact. Spill light occurs when site lighting fixtures are not properly aimed or shielded to direct light to the desired location and light escapes and partially illuminates a surrounding location.

Sensitive uses (e.g., residential uses) surrounding the Project site could be impacted by the light from development within the boundaries of the Project site.

Glare is the result of improperly aimed or blocked lighting sources that are visible against a dark background such as the night sky. Glare may also refer to the sensation experienced looking into an excessively bright light source that causes a reduction in the ability to see or causes discomfort. Glare generally does not result in illumination of off-site locations but results in a visible source of light viewable from a distance. Glare could occur from building materials of the new structures, including glass, concrete, stucco, wood, and other materials.

Construction
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 87 Construction activities would occur during weekdays (Monday through Friday) between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Project construction is not anticipated to require nighttime lighting. However, if needed, any construction-related illumination during evening hours would consist of the minimum lighting required for safety and security purposes only and would occur only for the duration required for the temporary construction process. Due to its limited scope and short duration, light resulting from construction activities would not substantially impact sensitive uses, substantially alter the character of off-site areas surrounding the construction area or interfere with the performance of an off-site activity. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, and light impacts associated with construction would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required.

Operation
The Project site does not currently include any sources of lighting. Existing sources of light in the Project area are associated with the residences (i.e., exterior lighting and lit windows at night) to the south. The proposed Project would install nighttime security lighting. Thus, the proposed Project would introduce new sources of light where such sources do not currently exist.

The Project site would be illuminated with five pole mounted LED light fixtures: three located along the south side of the reservoir pad and two along the north side of the pad. The light poles would be limited to a maximum 15 feet in height, measured from the surface of the pavement to the face of the light fixtures. The light fixtures would remain off during the day and would be motion activated to turn on during nighttime hours when there is movement on site. Additionally, the light fixtures would be shielded downward and towards the Project site to prevent lighting from spilling onto adjacent properties. The lighting would be designed to provide 3 footcandles near the above ground piping located adjacent to the reservoirs and the site entrance, and a minimum of 0.15 footcandles throughout the remainder of the site. Further, the Project site is surrounded by existing vegetation which would further minimize the impact of glare from proposed lighting.

The City’s Municipal Code does not include specific light and glare standards. However, as described above, Project site lighting would be designed to eliminate spillover of light onto adjacent properties or create glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Therefore, impacts associated with light or glare would be less than significant.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 88 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts
to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer
to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared
by the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. In determining
whether impacts to forest resources, including
timberland, are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to information
compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the
state’s inventory of forest land, including the
Forest and Range Assessment Project and the
Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest
carbon measurement methodology provided in
Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air
Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,
to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 89 No Impact. The Project site is developed with an existing reservoir and associated facilities including pipelines and is located within an existing developed residential area. The proposed Project would demolish the existing reservoir and construct two new reservoirs on the 2.0-acre site. There are currently no agricultural activities within or adjacent to the Project site. The Project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance by the California Department of Conservation. In addition, the Project site is identified as “Grazing Land” by the California Department of Conservation’s California Important Farmland Finder (FMMP 2022). There would be no impacts related to the conversion of Farmland from the proposed Project.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The Project site has land use designation of Low Density and a zoning designation of Single Family Estate (E-7). The Project site is not designated or zoned for agricultural use, used for agriculture, or subject to a Williamson Act contract. In addition, the Project site is identified as “Grazing Land” by the California Department of Conservation’s California Important Farmland Finder (FMMP, 2022). Therefore, replacement of the existing reservoir with two new reservoirs would not have an impact on agricultural zoning or a Williamson Act contract, and no impact would occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project site is developed with an existing reservoir and associated facilities including pipelines and is located within an existing developed residential area. There are no forest lands or resources on or in proximity to the Project site. Additionally, the Project site is not designated or zoned for forest or timber land or used for foresting. As such, development of the proposed Project would have no impact on forest land or resources.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The Project site is developed with an existing reservoir and associated facilities including pipelines and is located within an existing developed residential area. There are no forest lands or resources on or in proximity to the Project site. Therefore, development of the proposed Project would not cause loss of forest land or convert forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur to forest land or timberlands. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The proposed Project includes the demolition of an existing reservoir and the construction of two new reservoirs. The Project is consistent with the land use designation and zoning of the Project site. As previously discussed within this section, the Project site does not contain existing farmland or forest land, and therefore, development of the Project would not convert farmland or forest land. In addition, the Project site is identified as “Grazing Land” by the California Department of Conservation’s California Important Farmland Finder. Based on the site location and its urban nature, the proposed Project would not cause conversion of farmland or forest land as the proposed Project would be developed consistent with the intended designated uses. Therefore, the Project would result in no impact.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 90 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
AIR QUALITY. Where available, the
significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management district or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to
make the following determinations. Would the
project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading
to odors) affecting a substantial number of
people?
This section was prepared using the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum prepared by LSA on May 12, 2023 (Appendix A) and the Subsequent Memorandum for the Improvement of Two Access Roads for the Proposed North Glendora Water Tank Project prepared by EPD Solutions on October 12, 2023 (Appendix B).
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are responsible for preparing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which addresses federal and state Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. The AQMP details goals, policies, and programs for improving air quality in the SCAB. In preparation of the AQMP, SCAQMD and SCAG uses regional growth projections to forecast, inventory, and allocate regional emissions from land use and development-related sources. For purposes of analyzing consistency with the AQMP, if a proposed project would result in growth that is substantially greater than what was anticipated, then the proposed project would conflict with the AQMP. On the other hand, if a project’s density is within the anticipated growth of a jurisdiction, its emissions would be consistent with the assumptions in the AQMP, and the project would not conflict with SCAQMD’s attainment plans (Consistency Criterion 1). In addition, the SCAQMD considers a project consistent with the AQMP if the project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new violation (Consistency Criterion 2).

Furthermore, the SCAB is in a non-attainment status for federal ozone standards, and state and federal particulate matter standards. The SCAB has a maintenance status for federal PM10 standards. Any development in the SCAB, including the proposed Project, could cumulatively contribute to these pollutant violations. Should construction or operation of the proposed Project exceed these thresholds, a significant impact could occur; however, if estimated emissions are less than the thresholds, impacts would be considered less than significant.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 91 The Project site is within the City of Glendora and has a land use designation of Low Density and a zoning designation of Single-Family Estate (E-7). The proposed Project would redevelop the site by replacing the existing reservoir with two new reservoirs. The use of the site would not change with implementation of the Project. Emissions associated with water reservoir uses are much lower than emissions associated with residential uses. Therefore, the Project is already included in the AQMP projections. Thus, implementation of the Project would not exceed the growth assumptions for the Project site. As a result, the proposed Project would be consistent with Consistency Criterion No. 1.

As discussed below, the emissions generated by the construction and operation of the proposed Project would not exceed applicable thresholds, and the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause a new violation. As such, the proposed Project would be consistent with Consistency Criterion No. 2. Therefore, impacts related to conflict with the AQMP from the proposed Project would be less than significant.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard)? Less than Significant Impact. The SCAB is in non-attainment status for federal ozone standards, and state and federal particulate matter standards. The SCAB is designated as a maintenance area for federal PM10 standards. Any development in the SCAB, including the proposed Project, could cumulatively contribute to these pollutant violations. Evaluation of the cumulative air quality impacts of the proposed Project has been completed pursuant to SCAQMD’s cumulative air quality impact methodology. SCAQMD states that if an individual project results in air emissions of criteria pollutants (ROG, CO, NOx, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5) that exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended daily thresholds for project-specific impacts, then it would also result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of the criteria pollutant(s) for which the Project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. SCAQMD has established daily mass thresholds for regional pollutant emissions, which are shown in Table AQ-1.

Table AQ-1: SCAQMD Regional Daily Emissions Thresholds
Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions Thresholds (lbs/day) VOCs NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 SOX
Construction 75 100 550 150 55 150
Source: SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, April 2019.Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed May 2023).

CO = carbon monoxide
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District
SOX = sulfur oxides
VOCs = volatile organic compounds
Construction
Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would generate pollutant emissions from the following: (1) site preparation, (2) grading, (3) construction of reservoir NGR-A, (4) trenching/below ground piping of reservoir NGR-A, (5) demolition of reservoir B, (6) construction of reservoir NGR-B, and (7) trenching/below ground piping of reservoir NGR-B. The amount of emissions generated on a daily basis would vary, depending on the intensity and types of construction activities occurring. Additionally, the Project would generate emissions related to offsite impacts as well, as described further below.

It is mandatory for all construction projects to comply with several SCAQMD Rules, including Rule 403 for controlling fugitive dust, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions from construction activities. Rule 403 requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the Project site, covering all trucks hauling soil with a fabric cover and maintaining a freeboard height of 12-inches, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 92 Compliance with Rule 403, included as PPP AQ-2, was accounted for in the construction emissions modeling.

In addition, implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113, included as PPP AQ-3, which governs the VOC content in architectural coating, paint, thinners, and solvents was accounted for in construction emissions modeling. As shown in Table AQ-2, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) 0F0F 1 results indicate that construction
emissions generated by the proposed Project would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Therefore, onsite construction activities would result in a less than significant.

Table AQ-2: Project Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds Construction Phase
Maximum Daily Regional Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
VOCs NOX CO SOX
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Site Preparation 0.5 15.7 12.5 <0.1 2.5 0.4 1.2 0.4
Grading 0.6 19.9 15.0 <0.1 3.0 0.6 1.4 0.5
Construction of Reservoir NGR-A 0.6 15.1 12.6 <0.1 0.2 0.6 <0.1 0.6 Trenching/Below Ground Piping of
Reservoir NGR-A 0.2 3.9 3.5
<0.1

0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2
Demolition of Reservoir B 0.7 22.6 16.3 <0.1 3.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 Construction of Reservoir NGR-B 0.6 15.1 12.5 <0.1 0.2 0.6 <0.1 0.6 Trenching/Below Ground Piping of
Reservoir NGR-B 0.2 3.9 3.5
<0.1

0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2
Peak Daily Emissions 1.1 35.6 27.5 <0.1 6.5 3.5
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Significant? No No No No No No
Source: Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum (Appendix A).

Note = Site preparation and grading would overlap. Values may not appear to add correctly due to rounding.

Offsite Roadway Improvements
Prior to construction of the proposed Project, the proposed access roads would need to be improved in order to maneuver the load of construction equipment travelling to and from the site. As described previously, the Project would utilize either North Glendora Avenue or Easley Canyon Road for access during construction.

At the time that this document was released, the City has not yet chosen a preferred route. However, during Project construction, only one route would be utilized. Therefore, in order to provide a conservative analysis, Table AQ-3 below provides the estimated construction emissions that would result from the improvement of both roadways.

Roadway improvements would occur prior to the start of construction of the reservoirs and would include site preparation, grading and paving. Roadway improvements are anticipated to take place over 16 days.

Improvements to North Glendora Avenue would consist of widening the 5,280-foot-long roadway to 12.5 feet wide. Improvements to Easley Canyon Road would consist of widening the 800-foot-long roadway to 14 feet wide.

Table AQ-3 shows the anticipated emissions generated from offsite improvements. As demonstrated in Table AQ-3, the proposed roadway improvements would result in less than significant regional air quality impacts.

As the construction would occur prior to the construction analyzed in the previous analysis, the Project would continue to have a less than significant impact on regional air quality. 1 Note: The Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum was prepared using a previous version of the Project construction schedule in which Project construction was anticipated to take 14 months rather than 22 months. Thus, the modeling contained herein is conservative because it assumes a shorter construction period.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 93 Table AQ-3: Offsite Roadway Improvement Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
2024
Site Prep 1.8 16.7 15.1 0.0 2.9 1.7
Grading 2.5 43.8 26.7 0.1 8.5 3.5
Paving 0.9 7.1 8.6 0.0 0.6 0.4
Peak Daily Emission 2.5 43.8 26.7 0.1 8.5 3.5
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Significant? No No No No No No
Source: Subsequent Memorandum for the Construction of Two Access Roads for the Proposed North Glendora Water Tank Project (Appendix B).

Operation
The Project would not generate substantial air quality emissions in connection with the operation of the reservoirs. The water reservoirs are unmanned. Additionally, the site is already occupied by a water reservoir, thus the use of the site would not change with implementation of the Project. Maintenance trips associated with the proposed Project would be infrequent and negligible. Therefore, operation of the proposed reservoirs would not result in generation of air quality emissions that would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan, and impacts would be less than significant. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (SCAQMD 2008) recommends the evaluation of localized NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 construction-related impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. Such an evaluation is referred to as a localized significance threshold (LST) analysis. According to the SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, “off-site mobile emissions from the Project should not be included in the emissions compared to the LSTs” (SCAQMD 2008). SCAQMD has developed LSTs that represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards, and thus would not cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts. LSTs are developed based on the ambient concentrations of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 pollutants for each of the 38 source receptor areas (SRAs) in the Basin. The City of Glendora is located within SRA 9 (East San Gabriel Valley).

Sensitive receptors can include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities. The nearest sensitive receptor is the vacant single family residence1F1F 2 located approximately 150 feet (46 meters)
south of the Project site. As the existing residences are located approximately 46 meters from the Project site, the 46-meter receptor distance is used for evaluation of localized impacts. Table AQ-3 lists the localized significance thresholds that apply during Project construction.

Table AQ-4: Localized Significance Thresholds
Emissions Source Category Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Construction (3.5-acre site, 150 feet to sensitive
receptor) 185.0 1,745.0 29.0 8.6
Source: SCAQMD (2008).

Construction
Construction of the proposed Project may expose nearby residential sensitive receptors to airborne particulates as well as a small quantity of construction equipment pollutants (i.e., usually diesel-fueled vehicles 2 The residence located southwest of the Project site is currently vacant, thus there are no sensitive receptors present within the residence. However, out of an abundance of caution, the modeling conservatively uses this residence as the closest sensitive.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 94 and equipment). However, construction contractors would be required to implement measures to reduce or eliminate emissions by following SCAQMD’s standard construction practices. Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. As shown in Table AQ-4, Project construction-source emissions would not exceed SCAQMD LSTs and impacts would be less than significant.

Table AQ-4: Localized Significance Summary of Construction Emissions Emissions Sources Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
On-Site Emissions 35.6 27.5 6.5 3.5
SCAQMD LST 185.0 1,745.0 29.0 8.6
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Source: Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum (Appendix A).

Offsite Roadway Improvements
Table AQ-5 shows the estimated localized construction emissions associated with the construction of offsite roadway improvements that would occur prior to the construction of the reservoirs. The emission and emission thresholds include the access road construction emissions generated just from onsite sources. As demonstrated in Table AQ-5, the construction roadway improvements would result in less than significant localized air quality impacts. As the construction would occur prior to the construction analyzed in the previous analysis, the Project would continue to have a less than significant impact on localized air quality.

Table AQ-5: Localized Significance Summary of Offsite Improvement Emissions Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
2024
Site Preparation 16.6 14.6 2.8 1.7
Grading 19.5 17.1 3.2 1.9
Paving 7.1 7.8 0.0 0.4
Maximum Daily Emission 19.5 17.1 3.2 1.9
SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 185.0 1,745.0 29.0 8.6
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Source: Subsequent Memorandum for the Construction of Two Access Roads for the Proposed North Glendora Water Tank Project (Appendix B).
e) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not generate other emissions, not described previously. The Project site does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors.

According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor issues include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting activities, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding operations. The proposed Project would develop and operate two water reservoirs, which would not involve the types of uses that lead to odors.

Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt (utilized for the access road widening) during construction activities. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of construction; no impact would occur.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 95 The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 (included as PPP AQ-1) to prevent occurrences of public nuisance odors. Therefore, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to other emissions (such as those leading to odors) that could adversely affect a substantial number of people.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
PPP AQ-1: Rule 402. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 402. The Project shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.

PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following:
• All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather; preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less.

PPP AQ-3: Rule 1113. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. Only “Low-Volatile Organic Compounds” paints (no more than 50 gram/liter of VOC) and/or High Pressure Low Volume (HPLV) applications shall be used.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 96 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the
project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
This section was prepared using the Biological Letter Report prepared by Blackhawk Environmental in June 2023 (Appendix C).
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant with Mitigation. A Biological Letter Report (BLR) was prepared by Blackhawk Environmental for the proposed Project, which included an initial field survey conducted on August 25, 2022, and a follow up biological resource survey and focused rare plant survey conducted on June 1, 2023 (Appendix C). According to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Native Plant Society (CNPS), eBird and USFWS Information for Planning and Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 97 Consultation (IPAC), a total of 13 special-status plant species and 10 special-status wildlife species occurrences have the potential to occur on or within the vicinity of the Project site. These include those species listed or candidates for listing by the USFWS, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and CNPS. All habitats with the potential to be used by sensitive species were evaluated during the field surveys for their presence or potential presence.

Sensitive Plant Species
Table BIO-1 shows the 13 special-status plant species that have been reported to historically or presently occur within three miles of the Project site. During the initial biological resource assessment in August 2022, seven special-status plant species were determined to have a potential to occur within the Project impact area. These include many-stemmed dudleya, Greata’s aster, white rabbit-tobacco, Parry’s spineflower, San Gabriel Bedstraw, thread-leaved brodiaea (state and federally-listed) and slender mariposa lily. One June 1, 2023, a focused rare plant survey was conducted to determine if any of these species occur within the Project site. Based on the findings of the focused rare plant survey, no rare plants were found present within the Project site. Therefore, the seven rare plant species are considered absent from the site. Additionally, none of the species identified in the literature review were observed at the time of the survey and are therefore considered absent from the Project Site.

Table BIO-1: Potentially Occurring Plant Species
Species Name Potential for
Occurrence
California satintail (Imperata brevifolia) Absent
Chaparral ragwort (Senecio aphanactis) Absent
Greata’s aster (Symphyotrichum greatae) Absent
Many-stemmed dudleya (Dudleya multicaulis) Absent
Mesa horkelia (Horkelia cuneata var. puberula) Absent
Parry’s spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi) Absent San Gabriel Bedstraw (Galium grande) Absent
San Gabriel Mountains dudleya (Dudleya densiflora) Absent Slender horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) Absent Slender mariposa lily (Calochortus clavatus var. gracilis) Absent Sonoran maiden fern (Thelypteris puberula var. sonorensis) Absent Thread-leaved brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) Absent
White rabbit-tobacco (Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum) Absent Temporary Impacts to Special-status Plants
Special-status plant species were found absent from the Project site and the 200-foot Survey Buffer; however, several special-status plant species are known to occur within the region and may exist beyond the Project site. Therefore, temporary indirect impacts to special-status plant species may occur as a result of offsite sedimentation and erosion, pollution, debris, dust and/or unauthorized construction activities occurring beyond the proposed impact limits.

In order to minimize temporary impacts to special-status plant species, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is incorporated into the Project to require prior to the commencement of ground disturbing activities, the boundaries of Project site be clearly delineated with stakes, fencing or other conspicuous boundary markings, which would be maintained until the completion of construction activities, to prevent the unauthorized impact of habitat outside of Project site.

Impacts related to fugitive dust as a result of construction activities would be reduced through PPP AQ-2. As described further in Section 5.4, Air Quality, the Project would comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 which requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 98 control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source (PPP AQ-2).

Impacts related to sedimentation and erosion would be reduced through PPP WQ-1. As described further in Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed Project be required to obtain coverage under the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Storm Water Permit. The permit would require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which is required to identify all potential sources of pollution that are reasonably expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges from the construction site (PPP WQ-1).

The focused rare plant survey determined special-status plants were absent from Project impact areas and the Survey Buffer, therefore temporary or long-term direct impacts to special-status plant species are not anticipated as a result of Project. Additionally, the Project design incorporates stormwater conveyance systems that would prevent potential long-term indirect impacts from offsite sedimentation and erosion, pollution, debris and dust, that could affect undocumented special-status plants that may occur beyond the Study Area. Therefore, all other potential impacts to special-status plant species are not anticipated and considered less than significant.

With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1, PPP AQ-2 and PPP WQ-1, temporary indirect impacts to the special-status plants would be reduced to less than significant.

Permanent Impacts to Special-status Plants
As discussed previously, the Project impact area does not contain special-status plant species. Therefore, Project implementation would not result in the loss of any portion of a special-status plant population, thereby preventing any potential indirect impact to range wide plant populations. Furthermore, the Project design incorporates stormwater conveyance systems that would prevent potential long-term indirect impacts from offsite sedimentation and erosion, pollution, debris and dust, that could affect undocumented special-status plants that may occur beyond the Study Area. Therefore, long-term indirect impacts to special-status plant would be less than significant.

Other native bumble bee species were observed during the surveys, confirming that survey conditions were suitable for detecting Bombus species if present. Based on the focused survey results, Crotch's bumble bee is considered absent from the Project site and would not be impacted by Project implementation. Therefore, Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 99 no mitigation measures or Incidental Take Permit pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2081 are required for Crotch's bumble bee. The focused survey report is included in Appendix H.

Following circulation of the MND, comments received from CDFW also identified the need for protocol-level surveys for the federally threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica). In response, focused presence/absence surveys were conducted by qualified biologists in accordance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Coastal California Gnatcatcher Presence/Absence Survey Guidelines (USFWS, 1997) for areas outside of a Natural Community Conservation Plan jurisdiction. Six protocol surveys were conducted throughout suitable coastal sage scrub habitat located within the two Project parcels, including habitat both within and outside the proposed Project impact area between April 7 and May 30, 2026, during the 2026 breeding season. Approximately 5.15 acres of suitable coastal sage scrub habitat were surveyed. No coastal California gnatcatchers were detected during any of the six survey visits. Based on the protocol survey results, coastal California gnatcatcher is considered absent from the Project site and would not be impacted by Project implementation. Therefore, no additional species-specific mitigation measures are required. The focused coastal California gnatcatcher survey report is included in Appendix I.

Table BIO-2: Potentially Occurring Wildlife Species
Species Name Potential for
Occurrence
Arroyo chub (Gila orcuttii) Absent
Big free-tailed bat (Nyctinomops macrotis) Low
Coast range newt (Taricha torosa) Absent
Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica
californica)
Low Absent
(protocol surveys
conducted in 2026)
Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)
Absent (nursery
roosts), Low
(foraging)
Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow (Aimophila
ruficeps canescens)
Present
Southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) Absent Two-striped gartersnake (Thamnophis hammondii) Absent
Western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus)
Absent (nursery
roots), Moderate
(foraging)
Western yellow bat (Lasiurus xanthinus)
Absent (nursery
roosts and
foraging)
Crotch’s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii)
Absent (protocol
surveys conducted
in 2026)
Temporary Impacts to Special-status Wildlife
The BLR estimates Project construction activities would temporarily impact a combined total of 0.87 acres of suitable habitat for Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, therefore, temporary indirect impacts to this species are anticipated from temporary loss of nesting and foraging habitat during construction activities.

However, the BLR notes that there is existing expansive habitats surrounding the Project site that would provide high-quality, suitable habitat for this species to temporarily relocate and utilize for the duration of temporary construction impacts. Therefore, temporary indirect impacts to this Southern California rufouscrowned sparrow are considered less than significant.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 100
Temporary indirect impacts to other special-status wildlife species and birds protected under the MBTA that were determined to have potential for occurrence within the Study Area may occur as a result of increased noise, lighting, construction dust, increased predator pressure, and loss of foraging habitat. Furthermore, several special status wildlife species, known to occur within the region, could occupy areas beyond the Study Area. Therefore, temporary indirect impacts to special-status wildlife species may result in stormwater discharges of sediment laden water to downstream drainages that has the potential to modify and/or degrade downstream special-status wildlife habitat located outside of the Project limits and Study Area.

Other potential indirect impacts as a result of Project implementation may also include non-stormwater discharges resulting from spills or leaks that could pollute adjacent habitat. With implementation of Mitigation measures BIO-1, BIO-2, PPP AQ-1 and PPP WQ-1, potential temporary indirect impacts to special-status species wildlife species and birds protected under the MBTA would be reduced to less than significant.

Permanent Impacts to Special-status Wildlife
Long-term impacts to habitat for the Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow would be offset through implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3 which would require temporary impact areas to be restored and enhanced to through the preparation, approval and implementation of a Habitat Restoration Plan.

Additional direct impacts to Southern California rufous-crowned sparrows and migratory birds that may occur to individuals, nests or roosts, during vegetation, soil and debris removal would be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation measures BIO-1, BIO-2, and PPP AQ-1.

Potential for long-term indirect impacts to species occupying adjacent native habitat from increased noise and light associated the proposed permanent structures is not anticipated. Once the proposed Project is constructed, noise and light levels are expected to be consistent with ambient levels that currently exist at the water facility. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume wildlife species occupying adjacent lands have become accustomed to a similar level of anthropogenic disturbance and therefore these impacts are not considered to be significant.

With implementation of the Mitigation Measures and PPP’s outlined above, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to special status plant and wildlife species. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less than Significant with Mitigation. Riparian habitats are those occurring along the banks of rivers and streams. Sensitive natural communities are natural communities that are considered rare in the region by regulatory agencies, known to provide habitat for sensitive animal or plant species, or known to be important wildlife corridors. As described in the BLR, no riparian habitat was documented within the Project impact area. Therefore, impacts to riparian habitats would not occur with implementation of the Project.

The records search review conducted as part of the BLR identified a total of four CDFW special-status vegetation community (natural communities) occurrences within a three-mile radius of the Project site. These include the following: Canyon Live Oak Ravine Forest, Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest, and Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland. Of the four special-status vegetation communities, only one, Southern Coast Live Oak Riparian Forest, was determined to occur within the 200-foot Survey Buffer. However, the BLR confirmed implementation of the Project would not result in construction or permanent impacts to this vegetation type. All other vegetation communities within the Project survey area are not considered to be of special status according to USFWS or CDFW. Therefore, no impacts to state or federally designated special status vegetation communities would occur.

Temporary Impacts
The City of Glendora considers woodlands and sage scrub communities to be sensitive habitats pursuant to the Conservation Element of their General Plan. Implementation of the Project would result in temporary Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 101
impacts to 0.04 acre of Open Coast Live Oak Woodland, 0.07 acre of Coastal Sage-Chaparral Transition,

0.47 acre of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, 0.75 acre of Disturbed, 0.18 acre of Flat-topped Buckwheat, and

0.19 acre of Urban/Developed vegetation community.

However, the temporarily impacted areas (Coastal Sage Scrub and Woodlands) would be restored to conditions equal to or better than existing following Project construction. Onsite restoration and enhancement of temporary impact areas would be facilitated through implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3.

Mitigation Measure BIO-3 would require a qualified biologist prepare a Conceptual Restoration Plan (CRP) that would detail requirements for mitigating temporary and permanent impacts to Open Coast Live Oak Woodland and Diegan Coastal Sage scrub, deemed sensitive within the Glendora Community Plan. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3, onsite restoration of temporary impact areas would provide a 30 100 percent net increase of total habitat area within the Project site (mitigation at a 1.3:1 2:1 ratio).

Habitat enhancement would ensure that the future habitat would be provided at equal or better function compared to existing habitat. Therefore, temporary impacts to locally-protected sensitive natural community would be less than significant.

Permanent Impacts
The Project would include expansion of existing reservoir footprint, which would include the grading and permanent pavement of additional reservoir pad. Implementation of the Project would result in permanent impacts to 0.07 acre of Coastal Sage-Chaparral Transition, 0.08 acre of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, 0.02 acre of Disturbed, and 0.19 acre of Urban/Developed vegetation community.

However, permanent loss of sensitive habitat (Coastal Sage Scrub and Woodlands) as a result of Project implementation would be offset through enhancement of areas within the Project footprint where existing conditions are identified as disturbed, degraded, or otherwise non-sensitive habitat. Mitigation Measure BIO-3 would require a qualified biologist prepare a Conceptual Restoration Plan (CRP) that would detail requirements for mitigating impacts to Open Coast Live Oak Woodland and Diegan Coastal Sage scrub, deemed sensitive within the Glendora Community Plan. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3, onsite restoration of temporary impact areas would provide a 30 100 percent net increase of total habitat area within the Project site (mitigation at a 1.3:1 2:1 ratio). Habitat enhancement would ensure that the future habitat would be provided at equal or better function compared to existing habitat. Therefore, permanent impacts to locally-protected sensitive natural community would be less than significant.

According to the BLR, habitat onsite is currently degraded from fire damage. Therefore, through restoration and enhancement efforts, temporary impact areas are expected to provide higher quality habitat than that which currently exists. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3, temporary and permanent impacts to native habitat types would be adequately offset through enhancement and would not pose a significant impact to the ecological balance of the region. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-3, impacts related to sensitive natural communities would be less than significant. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. As discussed in the BLR, the Project site does not include any wetlands or vernal pools. In addition, there are no CDFW, United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) jurisdictional waters within the Project site boundaries. Therefore, the Project would not impact federally protected wetlands and no impacts would occur. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 102
Less than Significant with Mitigation. Wildlife corridors are linear features that connect areas of open space and provide avenues for the migration of animals and access to additional areas of foraging. The Project is located within a region that is largely surrounded by native habitat where wildlife movement is unrestricted with the exception of urban development of Glendora. According to the BLR, the Project site does not contain, or is not adjacent to, any wildlife corridors. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to established native resident or migratory wildlife corridor.

The Project site contains shrubs and trees that can be utilized by nesting birds and raptors during the nesting bird season of February 15 through September 15. Therefore, if vegetation is required to be removed during nesting bird season, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 has been included to require a nesting bird survey to be conducted prior to initiating vegetation clearing. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2, impacts related to nesting birds would be reduced to a less than significant level. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources? Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Project is subject to all applicable federal, State, and local policies and regulations related to the protection of biological resources and tree preservation. The BLR documented one mature coast live oak and three Southern California black walnut within the Project impact area. One Southern California black walnut showed significant signs of damage from the 2014 Colby Fire and is in a stage of recovery. Removal of these two native tree species (four individuals) is considered less than significant and is unlikely to impact the overall regional quality of woodlands that occur adjacent to the Project. Additionally, according to the BLR, the majority of native tree species identified were outside of the proposed impact limits of the Project and would not be impacted by Project construction. Furthermore, these species are not protected under Federal, State or Local Regulations. Native trees occurring on the Project do not qualify as parkway trees and are not located on private property, therefore are not protected under Glendora City Urban Forestry Manual Chapter 16.14 “Tree Removal.” Nonetheless, the Project would comply with the goals and policies of the Glendora Community Plan which prioritize the preservation and conservation of natural resources and sensitive habitats. Consistent with Policy CON-9.5 Ensure land use decisions consider the preservation of sensitive plant and animal species, critical habitat, wildlife corridors and biologically sensitive areas, trees and native shrubs would be preserved in place to the extent feasible during construction to avoid possible disruption.

Additionally, as described previously, impacts to sensitive vegetation communities “Coastal Sage Scrub and Woodlands” per the Glendora Community Plan 2025 Conservation Element would be offset through implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3. Therefore, Project implementation would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources and impacts would be less than significant. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. A BLR was prepared for the proposed Project, which included a field survey conducted on August 25, 2022, and June 1, 2023 (Appendix C to this IS/MND). The proposed Project site is not located within a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan, and therefore, would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. As such, no impacts would occur.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
PPP AQ-2: Rule 403. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which includes the following:
• All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 103
• The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, at least 3 times daily during dry weather; preferably in the mid-morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less.

PPP WQ-1: SWPPP. Prior to grading permit issuance, the project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer) pursuant to the Municipal Code Chapter 21.03.090(K). The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements to limit the potential of polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Glendora staff or its designee to confirm compliance.

Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Delineation of Project Impact Areas. Prior to the commencement of ground disturbing activities, the boundaries of proposed Project impact areas shall be clearly delineated with stakes, fencing or other conspicuous boundary markings, which will be maintained until the completion of construction activities, to prevent the unauthorized impact of habitat outside of Project impact areas discussed in this report. All employees shall be instructed that their activities, vehicles, equipment and construction materials are restricted to the proposed Project footprint.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Conduct Vegetation Clearing/Initial Grading Outside of the Bird Nesting Season OR Conduct Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Surveys. Project construction and grading plans shall state that ground-disturbing and vegetation-clearing activities should occur outside of the breeding season (February 15 – September 15). If vegetation removal or initial grading occurs during the breeding season, nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist for nesting raptors and migratory birds and within an additional 150-foot buffer for common avian species, 300 feet for listed or highly sensitive species, and 500 feet for raptors 100-foot survey buffer (for passerines) and 300-foot buffer for raptors within 3 days of construction. If nests of listed birds, migratory birds, raptors, or other sensitive species are documented, active nests will be avoided, and a nest buffer will be designated around each nest. Nest buffers will be determined at the discretion of the qualified biologist based on the location and species occupying the nest. Species that are not covered by the MBTA (such as European starling, house sparrow, Eurasian collared dove, etc.) will not require a nest buffer. The perimeter of this nest buffer will be clearly demarcated, and all construction activities will be prohibited within the delineated area until a qualified biologist has determined that the nest has either successfully fledged, been depredated, or failed due to other causes. Construction activities may proceed within the non-disturbance buffer if a qualified biologist is present to monitor active nests and determines that construction activities are not causing indirect or direct disturbance to a nest. All construction personnel shall be notified as to the existence of the buffer zone and instructed to avoid entering the buffer zone during the nesting season. Construction activities shall avoid any active nests and buffer zones until a qualified biologist has verified that the young have fledged or the nest has otherwise become inactive. A memorandum shall be prepared at the conclusion of surveys and submitted to CDFW. The memorandum shall include graphics and figures as necessary to support the results of the survey. CDFW shall be notified if/when any special status species is observed onsite.

Temporary impact areas containing sensitive (DCSS and CLOW) and non-sensitive habitat types (Coastal Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 104
Sage – Chaparral Transition [CSCT] and Flat-topped Buckwheat Scrub [FTBS]), shall be restored/enhanced with DCSS and CLOW to provide mitigation ratio of sensitive habitat 2:1 1.3:1 ratio. Total vegetation cover should be equal to or greater than pre-construction levels. Nonnative species shall not be used during restoration planting. Weed species within the restoration area shall be controlled until the site is adequately restored per the requirements outlined in the CRP. The Habitat Restoration Plan shall also include measurable success criteria, a minimum five-year monitoring period, and adaptive management strategies to ensure restoration goals are met.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 105
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
in § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
This section was prepared using the Cultural Resources Study prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. on January 12, 2023 (Appendix D).
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
Less Than Significant Impact. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, a historical resource is defined as something that meets one or more of the following criteria: (1) listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources; (2) listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(k); (3) identified as significant in a historical resources survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g); or (4) determined to be a historical resource by the Project’s Lead Agency. Implementation of the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines, as there are no eligible historical resources on the Project site.

The California Register of Historical Resources defines a “historical resource” as a resource that meets one or more of the following criteria: (1) associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns or local or regional history of the cultural heritage of California or the United States; (2) associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; (3) embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or (4) has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

A Cultural Resources Study was conducted for the proposed Project to locate and record any historical resources that may be present within the Project site (Appendix D). A field survey of the Project site was conducted on August 25, 2022, which did not identify the presence of any historic or prehistoric cultural resources as defined by CEQA within the Project site. Aerial photographs indicate a residential property was constructed between 1953 and 1964 at 1160 North Glendora, just south of the Project site. However, this residence is outside of the Project site boundaries and would not be impacted by the Project. Therefore, since no historical resources were identified on the Project site, the Project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a historic resource pursuant to §15064.5. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 106
Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As described previously, the Project site has been previously disturbed through the construction of the existing reservoir. The Cultural Resources Assessment included an archaeological records search conducted through the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at Cal State University, Fullerton (CSU Fullerton) on September 30, 2022. The results of the records search did not identify any resources within the Project site; however, three previously recorded resources were identified within one mile of the Project boundaries. The resources identified are all historic and consist of the Angeles National Forest, the Glendora Ridge Motorway, and the Albourne Rancho/Rubel Castle Property. Additionally, the records search indicated that seven previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within a one mile of the Project site, none of which included the Project site. In addition to the records search, a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search was requested from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC responded on September 29, 2022, stating the SLF search was positive for previously known tribal cultural resources or sacred lands within one mile of the Project site. Additional outreach has been conducted by the City of Glendora under the official AB 52 Native American consultation process and is discussed in Section 5.18, Tribal Cultural Resources.

The field survey did not identify any archaeological resources within the Project site. According to the Cultural Resources Assessment, the steep topography of the Project site and lack of any features such as exposed bedrock or natural water sources directly within the Project indicate the site was not suitable for prehistoric occupation or resource exploitation. Therefore, it is unlikely that any resources are present within the Project site (BFSA 2022). However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 is included in the event that any historic or prehistoric cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during construction. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would require all construction work within 60 feet of the inadvertent discovery to stop, and for a qualified archaeologist to be engaged to discuss the discovery and determine if further mitigation measures are warranted. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1, impacts related to archaeological resources would be less than significant.
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site has not been previously used as a cemetery. Thus, human remains are not anticipated to be uncovered during project construction. In addition, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, CEQA Section 15064.5, and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, included as PPP CUL-1, mandate the process to be followed in the event of an accidental discovery of any human remains. Specifically, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered, disturbance of the site shall remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation into the circumstances, manner, and cause of death, and made recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative, in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (included as PPP CUL-1). If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Compliance with existing law would ensure that impacts to human remains would be less than significant.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
PPP CUL-1: Human Remains. Should human remains or funerary objects be discovered during project construction, the project would be required to comply with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which states that no further disturbance may occur in the vicinity of the body (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine the identity of and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must complete the inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 107
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Inadvertent Discoveries. Prior to the issuance of any permits for grounddisturbing activities that cause excavation of soils (including as grading, excavation, and trenching), the City of Glendora shall ensure that all Project grading and construction plans include specifications stating that in the event that potential cultural or archaeological resources are discovered during excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall cease within 60 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist from the City or County List of Qualified Archaeologists has evaluated the find to determine whether the find constitutes a “unique archaeological resource,” as defined in Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code. Work on the other portions of the Project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Any resources identified shall be treated in accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g).

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 108
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
ENERGY. Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
This section was prepared using the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum prepared by LSA on May 12, 2023 (Appendix A). a) Result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less than Significant Impact.

Construction
Construction of the Project would require energy for the manufacture and transportation of building materials and for site preparation, grading activities and reservoir construction. During construction of the proposed Project, petroleum fuels (e.g., diesel and gasoline) would be the primary source of energy for these activities.

Therefore, the analysis of energy use during construction focuses on fuel consumption. Construction trucks and vendor trucks hauling materials to and from the Project site would be anticipated to use diesel fuel, whereas construction workers traveling to and from the Project site would be anticipated to use gasoline-powered vehicles.

Estimates of fuel consumption from construction equipment, construction trucks, and construction worker vehicles were based on default construction equipment assumptions and trip estimates from CalEEMod and fuel efficiencies from EMFAC2021. Table E-1 details the construction fuel usage over the Project’s construction period.

Table E-1: Energy Consumption Estimates during Construction Fuel Type Total Fuel Consumption Percentage of Increase Countywide
Gasoline (total gallons) 4,077.0 0.01
Diesel Fuel (total gallons) 58,618.3 <0.01
Source: Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum (Appendix A).

As shown in Table E-1, construction of the Project would consume approximately 58,618.3 gallons of diesel fuel and approximately 4,077.0 gallons of gasoline. Based on fuel consumption obtained from EMFAC2021, approximately 608.6 million gallons of diesel and approximately 3,921.8 million gallons of gasoline will be consumed from vehicle trips in Los Angeles County in 2023. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would increase the annual construction generated fuel use in Los Angeles County by approximately 0.01 percent for diesel fuel usage and by approximately less than 0.01 percent for gasoline fuel usage. As such, Project construction would have a negligible effect on local and regional energy supplies. Furthermore, impacts related to energy use during construction would be temporary and relatively small in comparison to Los Angeles County’s overall use of the State’s available energy resources. There are no unusual Project Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 109
characteristics that would cause the use of construction equipment that would be less energy efficient compared with other similar construction sites in other parts of the state. Therefore, construction-related fuel consumption by the Project would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary energy use compared with other construction sites in the region, and impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
The Project proposes the replacement of a water reservoir with two new reservoirs and would not have any long-term effects on an energy provider’s future energy development or future energy conservation strategies. Once operational, the Project would generate demand for electricity as well as diesel fuel for the back-up generator and gasoline for maintenance vehicles. Operational use of energy includes security lighting, operation of electrical systems, and the transport of electricity and water to the site. This use of energy is typical for urban development, and no operational activities or land uses would occur that would result in extraordinary energy consumption. Overall energy use during operation would be negligible.

Therefore, construction and operations-related fuel consumption by the Project would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary energy use compared with other construction sites in the region, and impacts would be less than significant.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, construction and operation of the proposed reservoirs would use minimal energy (i.e., no natural gas and minimal electricity). The proposed water tanks would also be required to build to California Building Code standards, Title 24 energy efficiency standards, and CALGreen code, which includes design provisions to minimize wasteful energy consumption, thereby improving the efficiency of the overall Project. As a result, the Project would comply with existing State energy standards and would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. As such, the Project would have less than significant impacts related to energy.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 110
This section was prepared using the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Ninyo & Moore on May 5, 2023 (Appendix E) and the Paleontological Assessment prepared by Brian F. Smith & Associates on September 12, 2022 (Appendix F).
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42?
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in onor off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
waste water disposal systems where sewers are
not available for the disposal of waste water?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 111
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Less Than Significant Impact. A Geotechnical Investigation was conducted by Ninyo and Moore for the Project site (see Appendix E). As described in the Geotechnical Investigation, the Project site is within a seismically active zone. Because the Project site is in a seismically active region of Southern California, occasional seismic ground shaking is likely to occur within the lifetime of the proposed Project. However, according to the California Department of Conservation California Geologic Survey, the Project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The closest active faults are the Sierra Madre Fault which is located approximately 0.78 mile southwest of the site and the Duarte Fault, which is located approximately

1.44 miles southwest of the site (California Department of Conservation 2023). As the Project site does not contain an earthquake fault, it is not affected by a state-designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.

Thus, impacts would be less than significant.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less Than Significant Impact. As mentioned previously, the Project site is located within a seismically active region of Southern California. The closest active faults are the Sierra Madre Fault which is located approximately 0.78 mile southwest of the site and the Duarte Fault, which is located approximately 1.44 miles southwest of the site. Thus, moderate to strong seismic ground shaking can be expected at the site. The amount of motion can vary depending upon the distance to the fault, the magnitude of the earthquake, and the local geology. Greater movement can be expected at sites located closer to an earthquake epicenter, which consist of poorly consolidated material such as alluvium, and in response to an earthquake of great magnitude.

Structures built in the city are required to be built in compliance with the California Building Code (CBC [California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2]), adopted under Municipal Code Chapter 19.02.010, which provides provisions for earthquake safety based on factors including occupancy type, the types of soils onsite, and the probable strength of the ground motion. Compliance with the CBC would include the incorporation of: 1) seismic safety features to minimize the potential for significant effects as a result of earthquakes; 2) proper building footings and foundations; and 3) construction of the building structures so that it would withstand the effects of strong ground shaking. Implementation of CBC standards would be verified by the City during the plan check and permitting process. Because the proposed Project would be constructed in compliance with the CBC, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related to strong seismic ground shaking.
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction occurs when soil is transformed from a solid state into a liquefied state due to increased pressure. Liquefaction is most likely to occur when soils of higher porosity (i.e., clay) become saturated and subjected to seismic activity. Effects of liquefaction can include sand boils, settlement, and structural foundation failures. Soils that are most susceptible to liquefaction are clean, loose, saturated, and uniformly graded fine-grained sands in areas where the groundwater table is within approximately 50 feet below ground surface.

The Geotechnical Investigation (Appendix E) conducted for the Project site did not encounter groundwater during the field investigation estimates groundwater to be more than 100 feet deep in the hillside terrain.

However, fluctuations in groundwater could occur due to seasonal variations in precipitation and other factors. Additionally, the Geotechnical Investigation determined due to the relatively dense nature of the site’s underlying native earth materials and the presence of bedrock, risks associated with liquefaction would be considered "low" (Ninyo & Moore 2023). Furthermore, according to the City of Glendora General Plan Safety Element Figure SAF-4: Potential Seismic Hazards, the Project site is not located in an area mapped for high susceptibility to liquefaction. Thus, the soils underlying the Project site would not be considered at risk for liquefaction. Additionally, all structures built in the City are required to be developed in compliance Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 112
with the CBC (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2), which is adopted as Chapter 19.02 of the City Municipal Code. Compliance with the CBC, included as a condition of approval and verified by the City’s review process would ensure that impacts related to liquefaction are less than significant. iv. Landslides?
Less Than Significant Impact. Landslides are the downhill movement of masses of earth and rock and are often associated with earthquakes; but other factors such as slope, moisture content of the soil, composition of the subsurface geology, heavy rains, and improper grading can influence the occurrence of landslides.

According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the State of California Seismic Hazards Zones Maps indicate that the site is located adjacent to areas that are mapped as susceptible to seismically induced landslides.

However, the area where the existing cut slope would be expanded, and the slope that descends below the reservoir site to the east, are not located within the seismic-induced landslide hazard zone. Earthquake induced landslides tend to occur along weak bedding or other planes of weakness that are adversely oriented with respect to the exposed slope face. Based on regional geologic maps, field mapping and subsurface exploration, the Geotechnical Investigation found that the Project site’s formational materials consist of granitic bedrock. The Geotechnical Investigation did not observe evidence of significant slope instability such as existing landslides, scarps or tension cracks during site exploration and geologic mapping.

The Geotechnical Investigation conducted a slope stability analysis which consisted of an evaluation of geologic mapping data, field measurements of geologic structure, preparation of representative geologic cross sections and computer modeling. The stability of slopes comprised of granitic bedrock vary depending on the slope inclinations, slope directions, rock weathering and fracturing. Steeper slopes generally involve higher risk of instability depending on the integrity of the rock. Additionally, fractures or intersecting fractures that dip toward the face of a slope may cause instability. The slope was modeled as a 100-foot-high slope with a 33-degree inclination. A total of 32 discontinuities, including joints (fracture present in a rock along which there has been no displacement) and foliation (repetitive layering in metamorphic rocks) were considered in the analysis. Results of the slope stability analysis indicated the proposed cut rock slope is stable (Ninyo & Moore 2023). Given the results of the slope stability analysis, the Project would not be susceptible to landslides. Additionally, as discussed previously, a 12-foot-tall retaining wall would be constructed along the north, west, and southwest sides of the pad which would provide additional stability to the adjacent slopes. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project includes the site preparation and grading of a new pad to the west of the existing reservoir pad, and construction of two reservoirs. The Project would involve earthmoving activities that would disturb soil and leave exposed soil on the ground surface. As such, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the City’s grading standards and erosion control measures, included in Municipal Code Section 21.03.090. To comply, the Project developer shall submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan/Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (ESCP/SWPPP) for review and approval by the City (PPP WQ-1).

The proposed Project would also be subject to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting regulations, including implementation of a SWPPP and associated Best Management Practices (BMPs). BMPs may include a combination of mitigative construction methods to reduce, prevent, or minimize soil erosion from project-related grading and construction activities. Additionally, the Construction General Permit (CGP; Order No. R8-2002-0011) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), regulates construction activities to minimize water pollution, including sediment. With compliance with City Municipal Code stormwater management requirements, Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) SWPPP requirements, and installation of BMPs, which would be ensured by the City’s project review by the Department of Building and Safety, construction impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant. Additionally, following completion of grading and construction activities, graded areas Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 113
would be revegetated which would eliminate the potential loss of topsoil. Impacts would be less than significant.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Less Than Significant Impact. As described above, the Geotechnical Investigation conducted a slope instability analysis which found that the proposed cut rock slope is stable. Thus, on or off-site landslides would not occur from implementation of the Project.

Lateral spreading is a type of liquefaction induced ground failure associated with the lateral displacement of surficial blocks of sediment resulting from liquefaction in a subsurface layer. Once liquefaction transforms the subsurface layer into a fluid mass, gravity plus the earthquake inertial forces may cause the mass to move downslope towards a free face (such as a river channel or an embankment). Lateral spreading may cause large horizontal displacements and such movement typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. Groundwater was not encountered during onsite borings and is estimated to exist at a depth in excess of 100 feet (Ninyo & Moore 2023). Additionally, the Geotechnical Investigation determined that due to the relatively dense nature of the site’s underlying native earth materials and the presence of bedrock, risks associated with liquefaction would be considered "low" (Ninyo & Moore 2023). Similarly, the site is not susceptible to liquefaction.

In addition, the Geotechnical Investigation identified that due to the relatively dense nature of the underlying soils and the presence of bedrock, onsite soils are considered to have a low risk for subsidence. As described previously, compliance with the requirements of the CBC is required as part of the building plan check and development permitting process and would reduce potential impacts related to on- or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse to a less than significant level. Additionally, as discussed previously, a 12-foot-tall retaining wall would be constructed along the north, west, and southwest sides of the pad which would provide additional stability to the adjacent slopes. Overall, impacts would be less than significant.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils contain certain types of clay minerals that shrink or swell as the moisture content changes; the shrinking or swelling can shift, crack, or break structures built on such soils.

Arid or semiarid areas with seasonal changes of soil moisture experience, such as southern California, have a higher potential of expansive soils than areas with higher rainfall and more constant soil moisture.

The Geotechnical Investigation determined that near-surface soils onsite consist of moist, loose to medium dense, silty sand with gravel and no appreciable clay content. These materials are considered to be nonexpansive. Accordingly, the Project site does not contain expansive soils and as such, would not create substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property associated with the presence of expansive soils. In addition, the Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City’s Municipal Code, that require appropriate back fill, compaction of soils, and foundation design to ensure stable soils, which would be verified through the City’s plan check and permitting process. Thus, impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The proposed Project would not use septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. As a result, impacts related to septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would not occur from implementation of the proposed Project.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 114
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No Impact. Paleontological resources, or fossils, are the remains of ancient plants and animals that can provide scientifically significant information about the history of life on Earth. Paleontological “sensitivity” is defined as the potential for a geologic unit to produce scientifically significant fossils. This sensitivity is determined by rock type, past history of the rock unit in producing significant fossils, and fossil localities that are recorded from that unit. Paleontological sensitivity is assigned based on fossil data collected from the entire geologic unit, not just a specific site.

A Paleontological Assessment was prepared for the Project by Brian F. Smith Associates (Appendix F). The Paleontological Assessment describes that the Project site is underlain by granitic rocks, which do not yield fossils. Further, a paleontological literature review and collections and records search was conducted for the Project. The records search indicated that no known fossil localities are present within the project boundaries.

Additionally, a search of published literature also indicated that the closest-known fossil locality is located about five to six miles southwest of the Project in Irwindale, consisting of the remains of a Pleistocene mastodon.

Based on the results of the Paleontological Assessment, the Project site is considered to have no paleontological sensitivity and construction activities have no potential to impact significant paleontological resources. As such, there would be no impacts related to paleontological resources.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 115
This section was prepared using the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum prepared by LSA on May 12, 2023 (Appendix A) and the Subsequent Memorandum for the Improvement of Two Access Roads for the Proposed North Glendora Water Tank Project prepared by EPD Solutions on October 12, 2023 (Appendix B).

GHG Thresholds
SCAQMD: SCAQMD does not have approved thresholds; however, SCAQMD does have draft thresholds that provide a tiered approach to evaluate greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts. The current interim SCAQMD thresholds consist of the following:
• Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA.
• Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it does not have significant GHG emissions. • Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant:
o Residential and Commercial land use: 3,000 MTCO2e per year o Industrial land use: 10,000 MTCO2e per year
o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e per year; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e per year
o Tier 4 has the following options:
o Option 1: Reduce business as usual emissions by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined.
o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures o Option 3, 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employee:

4.8 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans; o Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e/SP/year o Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.

In addition, SCAQMD methodology for a project’s construction emissions are to average them over 30-years and then add them to the project’s operational emissions to determine if the project would exceed the screening values listed above (Appendix A).

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the
project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 116
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Less Than Significant Impact. Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources, such as site excavation, grading, utility engines, heavy-duty construction vehicles onsite, equipment hauling materials to and from the site, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew.

Additionally, offsite improvements would be conducted that would contribute to the generation of GHG, which have been included in Project analysis of GHG as well. Exhaust emissions from onsite construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The estimated construction GHG emissions that would be generated from implementation of the proposed Project are shown in Table GHG-1. As shown in Table GHG-1, construction of the Project would generate an estimate of 455.8 MT of CO2e. When amortized over the 30-year life of the Project, annual emissions would be 15.2 MT of CO2e.

Table GHG-1: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Activity Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e)
2024 (Roadway Improvements) 49.0
2024 (Water Tank Demo and Construction) 394.0
2025 12.8
Total Project Emissions 455.8
Construction Emissions Amortized over 30 years 15.2
SCAQMD Threshold 3,000
Threshold Exceeded? No
Source: Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum (Appendix A) and Subsequent Memorandum for the Improvement of Two Access Roads for the Proposed North Glendora Water Tank Project (Appendix B).

Note: Numbers may not appear to add correctly due to rounding.

CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent
SCAQMD has not established a threshold of significance for GHGs emitted during construction. However, lead agencies are required to quantify and disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction.

Thus, this analysis utilizes the SCAQMD Tier 3 threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e emissions per year. The SCAQMD then recommends that construction GHG emissions be amortized over the life of the Project, defined as 30 years), added to the operational emissions, and compared to the applicable GHG significance threshold tier. However, the Project is not expected to generate any net GHG emissions during ongoing operation.

Routine maintenance is expected to result in a negligible number of trips. In the event that an additional vehicle trip to the Project site above one trip per day is occasionally made as a result of the Project, the resultant GHGs generated would be of insignificant quantities.

Additionally, construction emissions are temporary and would cease to occur after the construction period; therefore, the Project would not result in the generation of substantial GHG emissions during construction.

Therefore, demolition and construction activities would not generate a significant amount of GHG emissions and impacts would be less than significant.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less Than Significant Impact. In 2006, the California State Legislature adopted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires CARB to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve GHG emissions equivalent to statewide levels in 1990 by 2020 through an enforceable statewide emission cap, which was phased in starting in 2012. In 2022, CARB updated their Scoping Plan to reflect a reduction target for 2030 at 40 percent below 1990 levels. Therefore, as the proposed Project meets the current interim emissions targets/thresholds established by SCAQMD, it would also be on track to meet the Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 117
reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, as mandated by the State. Furthermore, all of the post-2020 reductions in GHG emissions are addressed via regulatory requirements at the State level, and the proposed Project would be required to comply with these regulations as they come into effect.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Impacts would be less than significant.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 118
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
Less Than Significant Impact. Development of the Project would require standard transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. If the use of these materials does not adhere to established federal, state, and local laws and regulations, workers, building occupants and residents, the public, and/or the environment could be exposed to hazardous materials.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 119
Construction
Heavy construction equipment (e.g., dozers, excavators, tractors) would be operated for development of the Project. The equipment would be fueled and maintained by petroleum‐based substances such as diesel fuel, gasoline, oil, and hydraulic fluid, which are considered hazardous if improperly stored, handled, or transported. Other materials used—such as paints, adhesives, and solvents—could also result in accidental releases or spills that could pose risks to people and the environment. These risks are standard; however, on all construction sites, and the Project would not cause greater risks than would occur on other similar construction sites.

Construction contractors would be required to comply with federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding the transport, use, and storage of hazardous materials. Applicable laws and regulations include CCR, Title 8 Section 1529 (pertaining to ACM) and Section 1532.1 (pertaining to LBP); CFR, Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M (pertaining to ACM); CCR, Title 23, Chapter 16 (pertaining to UST); CFR, Title 29 - Hazardous Waste Control Act; CFR, Title 49, Chapter I; and Hazardous Materials Transportation Act requirements as imposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (CalOSHA), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Additionally, construction activities would require a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is mandated by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit (included as PPP WQ-1 herein) and enforced by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). The SWPPP will include strict onsite handling rules and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize potential adverse effects to workers, the public, and the environment during construction, including, but not limited to:
• Establishing a dedicated area for fuel storage and refueling activities that includes secondary containment protection measures and spill control supplies; • Following manufacturers’ recommendations on the use, storage, and disposal of chemical products used in construction;
• Avoiding overtopping construction equipment fuel tanks; • Properly containing and removing grease and oils during routine maintenance of equipment; and • Properly disposing of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals.

Mandatory compliance with applicable laws and regulations related to the routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities at the Project site would limit potentially significant hazards to construction workers, the public, and the environment. Additionally, all construction equipment would be staged within the construction staging area as shown on Figure 3-1, Conceptual Site Plan, which would eliminate the need for daily transport of equipment through the surrounding residential area. Impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
The Project site would be developed with two water reservoirs. Operation of the reservoirs would not involve the use, storage, or transport of hazardous materials that could result in the risk of release or emission of hazardous emissions. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant.

Construction
Accidental Releases. While the routine use, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials in accordance with applicable regulations during construction activities would not pose health risks or result in significant impacts; improper use, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 120
could result in accidental spills or releases, posing health risks to workers, the public, and the environment.

To avoid an impact related to an accidental release, the use of BMPs during construction are implemented as part of a SWPPP as required by the NPDES General Construction Permit. Implementation of an SWPPP would minimize potential adverse effects to workers, the public, and the environment. Construction contract specifications would include strict onsite handling rules and BMPs that include, but are not limited to:
• Establishing a dedicated area for fuel storage and refueling and construction dewatering activities that includes secondary containment protection measures and spill control supplies; • Following manufacturers’ recommendations on the use, storage, and disposal of chemical products used in construction;
• Avoiding overtopping construction equipment fuel tanks; • Properly containing and removing grease and oils during routine maintenance of equipment; and • Properly disposing of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals.

Therefore, Project construction would result in less than significant impacts related to hazards to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.

Operation
The Project site would be developed with two water reservoirs. Operation of the reservoirs would not require the use of hazardous materials that could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment.

Thus, impacts would be less than significant.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
No Impact. St. Lucy’s Priory High School is located approximately 0.81-mile from the Project site.

Furthermore, as noted in Sections 5.9(a) and 5.9(b), the proposed Project is not anticipated to release hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes in significant quantities. Therefore, the proposed Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. As such, no impact would occur.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. The Project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, as maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). According to the DTSC's publicly accessible database, EnviroStor, the Project site is not listed as a hazardous materials site nor are there any hazardous material sites listed within a 1,500-foot radius of the site (DTSC 2023). Therefore, no impact would occur.
e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. The proposed Project site is located approximately 6.37 miles northwest of Brackett Airfield and is outside the boundaries of the Bracket Field Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Los Angeles Airport Land Use Commission 2015). Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. No impact would occur.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 121
f) Impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The City of Glendora has prepared a Multi-Hazard Functional Plan (MHFP) for emergency response within the City. The City also complies with the Los Angeles County Emergency Management Plan.

Additionally, the General Plan Safety Element identifies Foothill Boulevard and Grand Avenue as the City's designated emergency evacuation routes. The proposed Project involves the continuation of an existing use and would not impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, the City’s emergency response plans.

The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities, nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route. During construction and long-term operation, the proposed Project would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles as required by Los Angeles County Fire Department and the City. Because the Project would not impede any existing emergency vehicle access or evacuation routes and would not otherwise conflict with the City’s emergency response plans, there is no impact related to the Project impairing the implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
Less than Significant Impact. According to the CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone map, the Project site is within a Very Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VFHSZ) (CALFIRE 2023). However, the Project does not include construction of habitable structures and no people would reside at the site. Thus, the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires and impacts would be less than significant.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 122
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.

Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;
or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction
Construction of the Project would require grading and excavation of soils, which would loosen sediment, and then have the potential to mix with surface water runoff and degrade water quality. Pollutants of concern Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 123
during Project construction include sediments, trash, petroleum products, concrete waste (dry and wet), sanitary waste, and chemicals. During construction activities, excavated soil would be exposed, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and transport of sediment downstream compared to existing conditions. During a storm event, soil erosion could occur at an accelerated rate. In addition, constructionrelated pollutants, such as chemicals, liquid and petroleum products (e.g., paints, solvents, and fuels), and concrete-related waste, could be spilled, leaked, or transported via stormwater runoff into adjacent drainages and into downstream receiving waters.

The proposed Project would disturb more than one acre of soil. As a result, the Project would be required to obtain coverage under the RWQCB NPDES General Storm Water Permit. The permit would require a SWPPP which is required to identify all potential sources of pollution that are reasonably expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges from the construction site (PPP WQ-1). The SWPPP would include construction BMPs such as:
• Perimeter gravel bags or silt fences to prevent off-site transport of sediment; • Storm drain inlet protection (filter fabric gravel bags and straw wattles), with gravel bag check dams within paved roadways;
• Regular sprinkling of exposed soils to control dust during construction and soil binders for forecasted wind storms;
• Specifications for construction waste handling and disposal; • Contained equipment wash-out and vehicle maintenance areas; • Erosion control measures including soil binders, hydro mulch, geotextiles, and hydro seeding of disturbed areas ahead of forecasted storms;
• Construction of stabilized construction entry/exits to prevent trucks from tracking sediment on City roadways;
• Construction timing to minimize soil exposure to storm events; and • Training of subcontractors on general site housekeeping.

Adherence to the existing requirements and implementation of the appropriate BMPs as ensured through the City’s construction permitting process, which would ensure that the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, potential water quality degradation associated with construction activities would be minimized, and impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
Since the onsite uses would be the same as existing conditions, implementation of the Project would alter the type or amount of pollutants in the runoff from the Project site. Additionally, drainage runoff from the Project site would be adequately handled by the proposed Project’s drainage system. Onsite drainage would be collected via grated catch basins located adjacent to each reservoir before flowing into a 12-inch diameter PVC drain pipe, which would outlet to the existing grouted riprap outlet on the east side of the site. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is within the service area of the City of Glendora Water Division. In June 2021, the City updated their Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) which provides information on the City's current and future water supplies and demands. As described in the 2020 UWMP, the City’s primary source of water supply is groundwater from the San Gabriel Groundwater Basin (Main Basin). The City has 9,393 AF of adjudicated water rights from the Main Basin.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 124
As discussed previously, groundwater was not encountered during subsurface geotechnical exploration and is anticipated to be more than 100 feet deep in the hillside terrain (Ninyo & Moore 2023).

Development of the proposed Project would introduce additional impervious surfaces to the site through the extension of the concrete pad. The small increase in impermeable surface would have negligible impacts on groundwater recharge or groundwater supplies. Additionally, although the Project is adding a second reservoir to the site, the second reservoir would be used for reliability purposes within the existing 156-acre service area and would not result in growth inducing impacts. Therefore, water use would not increase with implementation of the Project. As a result, the proposed Project would not decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge; and the Project would not impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Thus, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact.

Construction
Construction of the Project would require grading and excavation of soils, which would loosen sediment and could result in erosion or siltation. However, as described previously, construction of the proposed Project requires City approval of a SWPPP prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer, as included in PPP WQ1. The SWPPP is required during the City’s plan check and permitting process and would include construction BMPs to reduce erosion or siltation. Typical BMPs for erosion or siltation, include use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, gravel bags, stabilized construction driveway, and stockpile management (as described in the previous response above). Adherence to the existing requirements and implementation of the required BMPs per the plan check and permitting process would ensure that erosion and siltation associated with construction activities would be minimized, and impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
The amount of impervious surface on the site would increase with implementation of the Project. However, since the onsite uses would be the same as existing conditions, implementation of the Project would not result in a substantial increase in the rate or amount of runoff from the site that would result in substantial erosion of siltation onsite or off-site. Site runoff would be collected via grated catch basins located adjacent to each reservoir before flowing into a 12-inch diameter PVC drain pipe, which would outlet to the existing grouted riprap outlet on the east side of the site. The reservoir pad would be sloped away from the reservoirs to eliminate the possibility of standing water near the reservoirs. Additionally, graded areas would be revegetated following grading which would reduce the potential for soil erosion. Therefore, impacts related to erosion or siltation onsite or offsite would be less than significant. ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 5.10(a) above, during construction, a SWPPP would be implemented to control drainage and maintain drainage patterns across the proposed Project. Since the onsite uses would be the same as existing conditions, implementation of the Project would not result in a substantial increase in the rate or amount of runoff from the site that would cause flooding onsite or offsite.

It would also not involve the construction of any uses that would alter the type or amount of pollutants in the runoff from the Project site. Additionally, drainage runoff from the Project site would be adequately handled by the proposed Project’s drainage system. Onsite drainage would be collected via grated catch basins located adjacent to each reservoir before flowing into a 12-inch diameter PVC drain pipe, which would outlet to the existing grouted riprap outlet on the east side of the site. Therefore, the Project would not result in flooding on- or off-site, and impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 125
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact. As described in the previous responses, the proposed Project would be required to implement a SWPPP during construction that would implement BMPs, such as the use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, and gravel bags, that would ensure that runoff would not substantially increase during construction, and that pollutants would not discharge from the Project site, which would reduce potential impacts to drainage systems and water quality to a less than significant level.

Since the onsite uses would be the same as existing conditions, implementation of the Project would not result in a substantial increase in the rate or amount of runoff from the site that would cause an increase in erosion or flooding. It would also not involve the construction of any uses that would alter the type or amount of pollutants in the runoff from the Project site. Therefore, development of the proposed Project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff and impacts would be less than significant.
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?
Less Than Significant Impact. According to the FEMA FIRM map #06037C1440F, the Project site is zoned as Flood Zone D, area with flood risk due to levee. As discussed previously, since the onsite uses would be the same as existing conditions, implementation of the Project would not result in a substantial increase in the rate or amount of runoff from the site that would cause an increase in erosion or flooding. Additionally, drainage runoff from the Project site would be adequately handled by the proposed Project’s drainage system. Onsite drainage would be collected via grated catch basins located adjacent to each reservoir before flowing into a 12-inch diameter PVC drain pipe, which would outlet to the existing grouted riprap outlet on the east side of the site. Further, the City would review the Project permit applications to ensure the proposed development would not be subject to significant flood hazard and structures would be floodproofed. Thus, the proposed Project would not impede or redirect flood flows, and impacts would not occur.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response 5.10 c)(iv), the Project site is classified as Flood Zone D, area with flood risk due to levee. However, a SWPPP would be prepared and implemented as part of the Project to ensure pollutants are contained and would not be released from the Project site during construction. Since the onsite uses would be the same as existing conditions, implementation of the Project would not alter the type or amount of pollutants in the runoff from the Project site. Additionally, drainage runoff from the Project site would be adequately handled by the proposed Project’s drainage infrastructure.

Therefore, implementation of the Project would not risk the release of pollutants due to Project inundation in a flood hazard zone.

The Project site is located approximately 40 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. Additionally, there are no bodies of water near the Project site with the potential to generate a seiche event. Therefore, the Project is not located within a tsunami zone or a seiche zone and no impacts would occur. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
No Impact. As described previously, the Project would be required to have an approved SWPPP, which would include construction BMPs to minimize the potential for construction related sources of pollution. With implementation of the construction source and treatment control BMPs that would be required by the City during the permitting and approval process, potential pollutants would be reduced to the maximum extent Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 126
feasible, and implementation of the proposed Project would not obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
PPP WQ-1: SWPPP. Prior to grading permit issuance, the project developer shall have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a QSD (Qualified SWPPP Developer) pursuant to the Municipal Code Chapter 21.03.090(K). The SWPPP shall incorporate all necessary Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other City requirements to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements to limit the potential of polluted runoff during construction activities. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the SWPPP and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Glendora staff or its designee to confirm compliance.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 127
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the
project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due
to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental effect?
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The proposed Project consists of demolition of an existing reservoir and the construction of two new reservoirs. The Project site is surrounded by residential uses to the south and the San Gabriel Mountains to the north. In addition, the Project does not involve development of roadways or other infrastructure that could divide a community. Vehicular access to the Project would continue to be provided via the existing access drive. The Project would not result in the closure of any public rights-of-way or otherwise impede movement in the area. The use of the reservoir site for water storage purposes would remain the same with the proposed Project, would be compatible with the surrounding community, and would not physically divide an established community. Therefore, the proposed Project would not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community, and no impact would occur. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The Project site has a land use designation of Low Density and a zoning designation of SingleFamily Estate (E-7). The proposed Project would replace the existing water reservoir with two new reservoirs, and the land use and zoning designations of the site would not change. Therefore, with adherence to all applicable plans, policies or regulations, no impact would be anticipated.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 128
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan?
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
Less than Significant Impact. According to Mineral Land Classification Maps from the California Geological Survey, the Project site is not within a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) where geologic data indicate that significant mineral resources are present 2F2F

3. Additionally, the Glendora Community Plan 2025 does not indicate that significant mineral resources exist within the City. There are no known mineral resources onsite, and the Project site is not utilized and has never been utilized for mineral extraction. The proposed Project would replace an existing water reservoir onsite with two new reservoirs and would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. Therefore, there would be no impacts related to mineral resources. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on the general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the Project site is not located within an area where geologic data indicate that significant mineral resources are present. Additionally, the Glendora Community Plan 2025 does not identify the Project site as an important mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site as delineated on a local plan. Thus, development of the proposed Project would not have a significant impact on mineral resources. No impact would occur.

Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs)
None.

Mitigation Measures
None.
3 California Department of Conservation. Kohler, Susan L. 2010. Plate 1: San Gabriel Valley P-C Region Showing MRZ-2 Areas and Active Mine Operations. In Special Report 209: Update of Mineral Land Classification for Portland Cement Concrete-Grade Aggregate in the San Gabriel Valley P-C Region, Los Angeles County. California Geological Survey.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 129
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
This section was prepared using the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis prepared by LSA, on May 25, 2023 (Appendix G).

City of Glendora General Plan
The Noise Element of the City of Glendora General Plan (Community Plan 2025) (2008) is intended to identify sources of noise and provide objectives and policies that ensure that noise from various sources does not create an unacceptable noise environment. Overall, the City’s Noise Element describes the noise environment (including noise sources) in the City; addresses noise mitigation regulations, strategies, and programs; and delineates federal, State, and City jurisdiction relative to rail, automotive, aircraft, and nuisance noise.

The City has adopted goals and policies to consider noise sources in the planning process to minimize the impacts of noise on residents. The goals and policies applicable to the project include the following:
• Planning Consideration: Non-transportation noise sources, including those generated from commercial/industrial activities, construction equipment and various community activities, have the potential of introducing undesirable impacts within the City. Development policy and regulatory standards should consider the reduction of these non-transportation noise impacts and mitigate them to a less than significant level.
• Goal N-2: Reduced noise impacts from non-transportation sources. • Policy N-2.2: Strive to resolve existing and potential conflicts between noise generating uses and human activities.
• Policy N-2.3: Prohibit significant noise generating activities from locating adjacent to residential neighborhoods and near schools.
• Policy N-2.4: Ensure that construction noise does not cause an adverse impact to the residents of the City by requiring that noise mitigation techniques be incorporated into all construction-related activities.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 130
City of Glendora Municipal Code
The City of Glendora Municipal Code Chapter 9.44, Noise Regulation, establishes criteria and noise standards for the regulation of noise levels within the community. Section 9.44.110, Construction of buildings and projects, states that:
"it is unlawful for any person within a residential zone, or within a radius of five hundred feet therefrom, to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work on buildings, structures or projects or to operate any pile driver, power shovel, pneumatic hammer, derrick, power hoist or any other construction type device (between the hours of 9 p.m. of one day and 7 a.m. of the next day) in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area is caused discomfort or annoyance unless beforehand a permit therefor has been duly obtained from the city.” Although the City’s Municipal Code allows construction to occur daily between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m., construction hours for the proposed Project would be limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday) between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Manual
Because the City does not have construction noise level limits, construction noise for the Project was assessed using criteria from the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018). Table N-1 presents the FTA’s general assessment daytime construction noise criteria.

Table N-1: Federal Transit Administration Daytime Construction Noise Criteria Land Use Daytime 1-hour Leq (dBA)
Residential 80
Commercial 85
Industrial 90
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018) FTA Vibration Standards
Vibration standards included in the FTA Manual are used in this analysis for ground-borne vibration impacts on human annoyance. The criteria for environmental impact from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the maximum levels for a single event. Table N-2 provides the criteria for assessing the potential for interference or annoyance from vibration levels in a building.

Table N-2: Vibration Annoyance Criteria
Land Use Max Lv
(VdB)1
Description of Use
Workshop 90 Vibration that is distinctly felt. Appropriate for workshops and similar areas not as sensitive to vibration.

Office 84 Vibration that can be felt. Appropriate for offices and similar areas not as sensitive to vibration
Residential Day 78 Vibration that is barely felt. Adequate for computer equipment and low-power optical microscopes (up to 20×).

Residential Night
and Operating
Rooms
72 Vibration is not felt, but ground-borne noise may be audible inside quiet rooms. Suitable for medium-power microscopes (100×) and other equipment of low sensitivity.

Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018) The City’s Municipal Code does not include specific criteria for assessing vibration impacts associated with damage. Therefore, for the purpose of determining the significance of vibration impacts experienced at sensitive uses surrounding the Project site, the guidelines within the 2018 FTA Manual have been used to Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 131
determine vibration impacts. Table N-3 lists the potential vibration building damage criteria associated with construction activities, as suggested in the FTA Manual. FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to

0.5 peak particle velocity (PPV) (in/sec) is considered safe for buildings consisting of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster), and would not result in any construction vibration damage. For non-engineered timber and masonry buildings, the construction building vibration damage criterion is 0.2 PPV (in/sec).

Therefore, to be conservative, the 0.2 PPV (in/sec) threshold has been used when evaluating vibration impacts at the nearest structures to the site.

Table N-3: Vibration Damage Criteria
Building Category PPV (in/sec)
Reinforced concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 0.50
Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30
Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20
Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA 2018) a) Generation of substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Less than Significant Impact.

Construction
Noise generated by construction equipment would include a combination of equipment delivery and construction worker commutes and Project construction activities. Construction activities for the Project would occur over two phases and include demolition, site preparation, grading, construction, and coating. The Project construction noise would be temporary in nature as the operation of each piece of construction equipment would not be constant throughout the construction day, and equipment would be turned off when not in use.

Table N-4 below lists typical construction equipment noise levels based on a distance of 50 feet between the equipment and a noise receptor. As shown, noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 74 dBA to 95 dBA when measured at 50 feet.

Table N-4: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels
Equipment Description
Acoustical Use Factor1
(percent)
Maximum Noise Level (Lmax)
at 50 feet
Compressor 100 81
Concrete Mixer 40 85
Concrete Pump 40 85
Crane 16 83
Dozer 40 80
Forklift 20 75
Front [End] Loader 40 79
Generator 100 78
Grader 8 85
Impact Pile Drivers 20 95
Scraper 40 88
Welder 40 74
Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 132
Source: Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances (USEPA 1971); Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA 2006).

Note: Noise levels reported in this table are rounded to the nearest whole number 1 Usage factor is the percentage of time during a construction noise operation that a piece of construction equipment is operating at full power.

Lmax = maximum instantaneous sound level
For the purposes of the Noise Impact Analysis, the closest off-site sensitive receiver to the Project site is the existing vacant residence3F3F
4, approximately 150 feet southwest from the existing reservoir. Table N-5 below shows the nearest sensitive use to the Project site, their distance from the center of construction activities, and composite noise levels expected during construction. As shown, construction noise at the nearest receiver location would approach 78 dBA Leq during daytime hours, which would not exceed the 80 dBA 1-hour construction noise level criteria for daytime construction noise level criteria as established by the FTA for residential land uses. Additionally, these noise level projections do not consider intervening topography or barriers. Therefore, actual construction noise may be lower than these projections due to topography surrounding the Project site.

Table N-5: Construction Noise Levels at Sensitive Receivers Receptor (Location)
Composite Noise
Level (dBA Leq) at
50 feet1
Distance (feet)
Construction
Noise Threshold
(dBA Leq)
Composite Noise
Level (dBA Leq)
Residence (southwest) 88 150 80 78
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (Appendix G) 1 The composite construction noise level represents the demolition phase which is expected to result in the greatest noise level as compared to other phases.
dBA Leq = average A-weighted hourly noise level
Offsite Roadway Improvements
As described previously, the Project would utilize either North Glendora Avenue or Easley Canyon Road for access during construction. At the time this document was released, the City had not yet chosen a preferred route. However, during Project construction, only one route would be utilized. Improvements to the roadway would occur prior to the start of construction and would include site preparation, grading and paving.

Roadway improvements are anticipated to take place over 16 days. Prior to these roadway improvements, the City would notify affected residents of the work to be done. Additionally, the City would be required to acquire any access easements that may be needed to perform the roadway improvements.

Improvements to North Glendora Avenue would consist of widening portions of the 5,280-foot-long roadway from approximately to 12.5 feet wide. Improvements to Easley Canyon Road would consist of widening an 800-foot-long portion of the roadway from approximately 10-12 feet wide to 14 feet wide.

As described above, Municipal Code Section 9.44.110 exempts construction noise between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. However, all Project construction activities, including offsite roadway improvements prior to construction, would be limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday) and occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Thus, the Project would comply with the City’s construction hours regulations. Therefore, Project construction would result in less than significant impacts on substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels.

Operation
Onsite Operational Noise. Implementation of the Project would not result in any new noise generating sources. Although the Project includes a backup generator, this would only be used to provide power to the site during electrical outages and would not run continuously. Overall, impacts related to operational noise would be less than significant.
4 The residence located southwest of the Project site is currently vacant, thus there are no sensitive receptors present at the residence.

However, out of an abundance of caution, the modeling conservatively uses this residence as the closest sensitive.

Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Glendora North Glendora Reservoir Replacement Project 133
Off-Site Traffic Noise. The proposed Project would not generate traffic related noise from operation beyond existing weekly maintenance trips that already occur with operation of the existing reservoir. Therefore, traffic noise impacts from Project related traffic on off-site sensitive receptors would be less than significant. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact.

Glendora City CouncilSeptember 22, 2026

Glendora City Council
September 22, 2026