full, including but not limited to building permit fees.
32. Zoning Clearance. No Building Permit shall be issued until a Zoning Clearance has first been issued by the City.
33. Agreement to Comply. Approval of this Design Revie is not valid until the property owner or authorized agent signs and returns the Agreement to Comply form, agreeing to the terms and Conditions of Approval. The signed form must be submitted to Planning Department prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance.
34. Compliance with Conditions. The applicant shall comply at all times with these conditions. If complaint are filed with the City, staff will review the complaints and determine if a meeting with the applicant and complainants can resolve the issue(s). If no resolution is reached, a hearing will be scheduled before the City Council for staff to present a recommendation to resolve the issue(s) The applicant shall be responsible for the fees to cover staff time.
35. Construction Hours. The Owner/Applicant, including all contractors and subcontractors shall limit construction activity, including equipment maintenance and site preparation, to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. No-noise generating construction shall occur on weekends or state holidays. Non-noise generating interior construction activities such as plumbing, electrical, drywall and painting (which does not include the use of compressors, tile saws, or other noise- generating equipment) are not subject to these restrictions. The applicant is advised that building inspector and planning staff will spot check and responds to complaints.
36. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained per the City-approved landscape and irrigation plan and maintained for the life of the project.
a. The type, size, density, and configuration of new plants shall be selected to maximize successful establishment and growth to achieve this landscaping objective within a reasonable period of time after installation.
b. All shrubs and plants shall be of a minimum size of one gallon, or equivalent, at the time of installation, and all trees shall be of a minimum size of 15 gallons, or equivalent, at the time of installation.
c. The applicant shall contact City Planning staff at least 48 hours prior to request for occupancy clearance in order to verify that landscaping and irrigation has been installed according to the approved plans, Failure to comply with the requirements could jeopardize issuance of the occupancy clearance.
37. Plans Requirements. The Owner/Applicant shall ensure all applicable final conditions of approval are printed in their entirety on applicable pages of grading/construction or building plans submitted to the Building Department.
38. Contractor and Subcontractor notification. The Owner/Applicant shall ensure that potential contractors are aware of City conditions and requirements. Owner/Applicant shall notify all contractors and subcontractors in writing of the site rules, restrictions, and Conditions of Approval and submit a copy of the notice to Planning Staff.
39. In the unexpected event archeological or paleontological resources are unearthed during project construction, all earth disturbing work within the project area of potential effect (APE) must be temporarily suspended until an archaeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume. A Native American representative should monitor any archaeological field work associated with Native American materials.
40. The project is required to comply with standard lighting requirements per the Guadalupe Municipal Code, which requires that light and glare be minimized on any adjacent properties.
Exterior lighting shall be shown on all Building plans prior to approval of the Zoning Clearance and Building Permit.
41. Stormwater. The project is Tier 3 project as identified in the Project Clean water Technical Guide, established as the guiding document for stormwater discharges in Santa Barbara County.
The project shall establish and implement a Stormwater Control Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
42. Site Maintenance General: The property and all of the facilities, including but not limited to buildings; parking areas; carport structures and trash enclosures and their immediate areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and free of accumulations of dirt, litter to the satisfaction of the City; and as further specified by Municipal Code Chapter 18.050.070.
43. Fence and Wall Maintenance: Fences and walls shall be maintained in an upright vertical and unbroken condition and in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 12.52.125. Any graffiti shall be removed within 48 hours.
44. In accordance with Sections 18,73.120 of the City the Municipal Code, this Design Review approval shall expire two (2) years from the date of approval, unless a building permit for the proposed improvements has been obtained prior to expatriation. Up to two one-year time extensions may be granted for good cause. An extension must be filed with the City prior to the permit expiration date.
45. Building Permits. A building permit application, plans and specifications demonstrating compliance with current California Building, Fire, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Green Building and Energy Standard Code requirements is to be submitted and permits obtained prior to construction.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
46. Fire Hydrant. Prior to occupancy, the number and location of fire hydrants shall be established in compliance with the Amended City of Guadalupe Fire Code 15.08.050 to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief.
47. Fire Lane Sign Requirements. No Parking/Fire Lane signs must follow these guidelines:
a. The CVC Code 22500.1 (CVC 22500.1) must be imprinted on the bottom of the sign. b. All lettering shall be red on white reflective background no smaller than 2 inches in height.
c. The sign shall be no smaller than 12 inches wide by 18 inches high. d. The sign shall be securely mounted facing the direction of travel and clearly visible to oncoming traffic entering the designated area. Signs shall be of durable material. e. Signs shall be installed at all driveway entrances and at intervals of not less than 100 feet along all designated fire lanes.
48. Fire Lane Curb Painting Requirements. Where a curb exists adjacent to a fire lane, the top and face of the curb shall be painted with red traffic paint. Where the curb is discontinued, a red stripe and stencil as described below shall be painted to define the fire lane. Red curbs, red stripes and white stencils must be maintained in good condition and follow these guidelines:
a) The face of the curb shall be stenciled with the words: NO PARKING FIRE LANE in white block letters a minimum 4 inches in height.
a. The stencil must be painted on the FACE of the curb. Exception: Under circumstances where the curb height is less than 4 inches, the stencil may appear on the top of the curb.
b. The stencil must appear every 50 feet or less, depending on the configuration of the fire lane. (Where a small island cannot contain both phrases, FIRE LANE must appear the NO PARKING may be omitted).
c. Where no curb exists adjacent to the fire lane, the edge of the fire lane shall be marked with an 8-inch-wide red stripe. In addition, a diagonal 8-inch-wide red stripe may be required between the edges of the fire lane, with the diagonal stripe connecting the stripes or curbs at the edges of the fire lane. Spacing of the diagonal stripe is every 50 feet.
d. The stripe shall be stenciled with the words NO PARKING FIRE LANE in white block letters, minimum 4 inches in height.
e. The stencil must appear every 50 feet or less, depending on the configuration of the fire lane. If the fire lane is less than 50 feet the stencil must appear at the beginning and end
of the fire lane.
49. Backflow Preventer. Prior to occupancy, the backflow prevention device shall be located to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief.
a) Fire Alarm System. A fire alarm system shall be installed in accordance with the C.F.C. and N.F.P.A. 72 standards. All alarm systems shall have an alarm permit issued by the Guadalupe Police Department. Permit shall be obtained prior to final occupancy approval. The fire alarm system shall be certificated by Underwriters Laboratories or an equivalent nationally recognized organization.
a. Deferred submittal of fire alarm plans is permitted. The plans shall be signed and sealed, on every sheet, by a registered Fire Protection Engineer or Fire Protection Contractor licensed in California.
b. A Fire alarm system, at a minimum incorporating tamper switches on control valves and a Central Station service for the water flow alarm shall be installed for fire sprinkler systems.
50. Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Detectors/Alarms. Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Detectors/Alarms shall be installed in accordance with the C.F.C., C.B.C., and N.F.P.A. 72.
51. Inspections/Approvals. The Fire Department shall inspect/approve the following:
Fire access road(s): prior to vertical combustible construction. a) Fire hydrants: prior to vertical combustible construction. b) Water mains: prior to vertical combustible construction. c) Underground fire sprinkler piping: prior to concealment. d) Overhead fire sprinkler piping: prior to installation. e) Fire Alarm system acceptance test: prior to occupancy clearance. f) Fire Department Key Box; mounted in proper location w/key(s) inside: prior to occupancy clearance.
g) The Fire Department shall be given 48 hours minimum notice for all inspections via the inspection request line 805-356-3905.
h) All permits shall be issued prior to start of any work.
End of Conditions
DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
4646 8TH STREET
GUADALUPE, CA
ATTACHMENT 3
CP #2
SET MAG IN AC
EL= 69.97'
TOP OF WALL 81.00
AT STEP
EXISTING BUILDING
• • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
TOP OF WALL 81.00
TOP OF WALL 76.38
TOP OF WALL 76.93
6" PVC INV= 73.73
TOP SILL= 71.05 TOP SILL= 70.96
AREA NOT ACCESSABLE
FOUND 2" BRASS CAP
MON. NO. 5304
FOUND 1.5" IRON PIPE DISK
MON. NO. 5266
FOUND 1.5" IRON PIPE DISKMON. NO. 5266
CP #1
SET MAG IN AC
EL= 70.05'
12" PVC INV= 67.78
4" BOLLARDS
TOP OF WALL 79.67
AT STEP
3" PVC INV= 70.56
HEAVY VEGETATION
DRAINAGEDITCH
No. 9249
STA TE OF CA LIFORNIA
LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR A. CHA LEY N ROBERT
D D D D D D D D D
S S S
S S S
W W W W W W W W W
S
S S
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
S S
S S
W
W
W
W
W
W W
D D
W W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
D D
D D D D D D D
D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D
W W
W W
W W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
(6) EXISTING APARTMENT
UNITS
PROPOSED
APARTMENT UNIT PROPOSED
APARTMENT UNIT
(5) PROPOSED
APARTMENT UNITS
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 3
3 4
4 4 5
6 L=88', S=0.50%
7 7
8 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
10 10
10 10
10 11
12 13
13 13
13 14
14 14
14 14 14
15 L=117', S=0.50%
L=33', S=6.2%
L=39', S=1.0%
L=26', S=0.50%
L=94', S=0.50%
L=111', S=1.28%
16 16
17 17
17 17
17 18 18
18 19
18 18
20 20
21 22
23 23
23 24
24 25
26 27
27 28
28 9
2.60%
4.07%
2.66%
2.35%
2.04%
2.04%
1.54%
1.54%
3.65%
1.91%
2.32%
2.32%
1.00%
1.50%
0.89%
0.25%
0.25%
0.80%
1.50%
1.55%
0.27%
2.00%
1.37%
1.58%
1.99%
2.00%
1.99%
1.37%
0.94%
5.00%
5.29%
2.00%
1.99%
1.99%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00% 1.00%
4.91%
1.00%
1.50%
12.82%
15.09%
22.35%
1.55%
1.00%
1.00% > > > > > > > > >
> >
>
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>
> > > >
> > >
>
1.34%
1.82%
1.72%
(69.80)
FS
(69.82)
FS
(69.94)
FS (70.83)
FG (70.62) FG (71.26)
FG
(70.64)
FG (72.67)
FG
(72.50)
FG
(71.28)
FG
(72.60)
FG
(69.97)
FG 70.33
FG 70.58
FG
(70.36)
FG
(69.94)
FS
(69.83)
FS
(69.79)
FS
(69.78)
FS
(69.79)
FS
69.80 TC69.80 FS
71.00 FS
71.00 FS 71.00
FS
71.00 FS 71.00
FS
71.00 FS 71.00
FS
71.00 FS 71.00
FS
71.00 FS 71.00FS 71.00 FS
70.95 FS
71.00 FF
71.25 FF
70.95 FS
71.00 FS 70.88FS
71.04 TC70.54 FS 71.04 TC
70.54 FS 71.04 TC 70.54 FS
71.04 TC70.54 FS 71.04 TC 70.54 FS 72.13 TC 71.13 FS
70.76 TC70.26 FL
70.95 TC70.45 FS
70.24 FS
69.99 TC69.49 FS
70.22 TC
69.72 FS 70.82 TC
70.32 FS
70.82 TC70.32 FS 70.82 TC 70.32 FS 70.82 TC
70.32 FS
70.82 TC70.32 FS 70.82 TC
70.32 FS 70.82 TC 70.32 FS
69.43 TG65.54 INV
70.33 FG
70.33 FL
70.79 FS
70.86 FS
70.58 FG
70.58 FG
70.58 FG
70.11 TC
69.61 FS
71.00 FS 71.25
FS
71.15 FS
71.15 FS
71.15 FS
71.15 FF
71.15 FF
70.48 FG
70.48 FG 70.48 FG 70.48FG 70.48
FG
70.48 FG 72.40
FG
69.59 FL
70.40 FL 70.46
FL 71.87
FL
70.65 FL
70.48 FG
70.48 FG
70.33 FL
70.05 TG66.12 INV
69.69 TG66.56 INV
70.24 TG
66.59 INV
70.18 TG
67.07 INV
69.49 TG68.49 INV
70.00 TG68.60 INV
70.00 TG
69.00 INV
70 70
70 71
71 72
71 66.46 INV
LIMITS OFEXCAVATION PER
SOILS REPORT.
EXISTING
GROUND
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN UNDERGROUND CHAMBER SYSTEM
ADS STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBERS. 6 ROWS OF 10 CHAMBERS
STONE INVERT: 63.50
CHAMBER INVERT: 65.50
6" ROW SPACING, 12" END SPACING
FOUNDATION PER
STRUCTURAL
PLANS. 21.50'
P.L.
FINISHED FLOOR
ELEVATION: 71.15
EXISTING
FINISHED FLOOR
ELEVATION: 71.15
PROPOSED CONCRETE
SIDEWALK
PROPOSED 6" CURB ONLY
PROPOSED AC PAVING
OVER CLASS II BASE
PROPOSED AC PAVING
OVER CLASS II BASE
PROPOSED CONCRETE
SIDEWALK
3' CONCRETE
VALLEY GUTTER
74.40'
PROPOSED AC PAVING
OVER CLASS II BASE
STONE INVERT: 63.50
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN UNDERGROUND CHAMBER SYSTEM
CHAMBER INVERT: 65.50 ADS STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBERS. 6 ROWS OF 10 CHAMBERS TOP OF STONE : 67.33 12" MANIFOLD PIPE
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
1 1"=10'
10' 10' 20'
10'
0'
SCALE: 1" =
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY
REVISIONS APP
THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OR LIABLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL
CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.
4646 8TH ST
APN: 115-121-010
GUADALUPE, CA 93434
DRAFTED BY
JOB NO.
SHEET
DATE
SCALE
OF
DATE JZ
05/03/2024
X"=X'
24026
4 X
REV APPROVAL:
PERMIT NO.:
LEGEND
TOW TOP OF WALL
FS FINISHED SURFACEFG FINISHED GROUNDFL FLOWLINE
TC TOP OF CURB
INV INVERTFF FINISHED FLOOR
(XX) EXISTING GRADE
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
23 EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN
4 EXISTING SEWER LINE TO REMAIN
56 EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE TO REMAIN
EXISTING WATERLINE TO REMAINEXISTING WATERMETERS TO REMAIN
EARTHWORK
CUT= 56 C.Y.
FILL= 406 C.Y.IMPORT = 350 C.Y. FILL
7 EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED
89 10
11 12
13 14
15 16171819
EXISTING APARTMENT UNITS TO REMAIN
PROPOSED CONCRETE PER SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONSPROPOSED 6" CURB ONLY PER CITY OF SANTA MARIA STD DTL RD-11PROPOSED 3' CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER PER DETAIL THIS SHEET PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSUREPROPOSED SEWER LATERAL PER CITY OF SANTA MARIA STD DTL SS-14BPROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT PER CITY OF SANTA MARIA STD DTL SS-12B.PROPOSED WATERMETER MANIFOLD PER CITY OF SANTA MARIA STD. DTL WA-23B. 20 PROPOSED 8" PVC SD, LENGTH AND SLOPE PER PLANPROPOSED 4" PVC SD, LENGTH AND SLOPE PER PLANPROPOSED NDS 9" CATCH BASIN WITH ATRIUM GRATE. TOP OF GRATE AND INVERT PERPLANPROPOSED NDS 12" CATCH BASIN WITH ATRIUM GRATE. TOP OF GRATE AND INVERTPER PLAN PROPOSED MIDSTATE 24" CATCH BASIN. TOP OF GRATE AND INVERT PER PLAN 21 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN UNDERGROUND CHAMBER SYSTEM ADS STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBERS. 6 ROWS OF 10 CHAMBERS STONE INVERT: 63.50
CHAMBER INVERT: 65.50
TOTAL SYSTEM LENGTH: 74.40' TOTAL SYSTEM WIDTH: 21.50' TOTAL SYSTEM HEIGHT: 3.83' 22 PROPOSED 8" OUTLET PIPE TO OUTLET CATCH BASIN WITH THREE 4" OUTLET PIPES PER CITY OF SANTA MARIA STD DTL. DR-13 23 BUILDING SET BACK
24 EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN
25 PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE PER CITY OF SANTA MARIA STD DTL SS-10D26 PROPOSED ROLLED CURB PER DETAIL THIS SHEET.27 PROPOSED 6" TO 1' CURB TRANSITION28 PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE FOR PROPOSED UNIT
VALLEY GUTTER DETAIL
N.T.S.
FINISH
GRADE
6" THICK CONCRETE
#3 @ 24" O.C.
3- #3 X CONT.
FINISH
GRADE
SITE SECTION
1"=10'
SITE SECTION
1"=10'
2'-0"
5"
6"
1'-0"
1 1
2"
R 1/2 R 3"
R 1/2"
R 1"
1"
ROLLED CURB
N.T.S.
C C
D D
1 3 4 9 10 14 15 20
21 23 24 26 29
2 5
27 6 7 8 11 12 13 16 17 18 19
22 25 28
PIONEER STREET
8TH STREET
CP #2
SET MAG IN AC
EL= 69.97'
APN: 115-12-1010
795 Guadalupe St
115-12-1012
765 Guadalupe St
115121013
759 Rubio St
115-12-1008
725 Rubio St
115-12-1007
813 Guadalupe St
115112005 DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
§
xx
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
DATE:
SHEET OF
SHEET CONTENTS:
12/20/24
8th street apartments
Guadalupe, CA 93454
4646 8TH STREETGUADALUPE, CA MASTANI Ph: (805) 284-5603 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY:
125 union avenue #201
Santa Maria, CA 93457
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
PO BOX 2267
santa maria office
orcutt, ca 93455
6907 El Camino Real, Ste. A
Atascadero, CA 93422
atascadero
gr
Concept Plans
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1 S1
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1
S1 S1
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6S6
S6 S6
S6 S6
S6
S6 S6
S6
S6S6
S6 S6
S6
S6 S6
S6
S6
S6
S6
S6
S6 S6
S6 S6
S1 S1 S1 S1
S1 S1 S1
S1 S1
S1
S1
S1 S1 S1
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3 S3 S3 S3 S3
S3
S2
S2
S2
S2
S2S2
S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2
S2
S2
S2
S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2
S2
S2
S2S2
S2
S2
S2
S2
S2S2
S2 S2
S2 S2 S2
S2 S2
S2S2
S2
S2
S2
S2
S2
S2
S2
S2
S2S2
S2
S4S4S4
S4S4S4
S4S4S4
S4S4
S4S4S4
S4S4S4
S5
S5
S5
S5
S5
S5
S5
S5
S5 S5
S5
S5S5
S5S5S5
S1
S1 S1 S1
S1
1 1
S6
S1 S1
S1
1 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3
S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2
S2 S2 S2 S2 S2 S2
S1
S1
S6S6
S6
S1
SS
S6 S6
S6
SHEET NO.
DATE
OWNER
SHEET TITLE
PLEIN
DESIGN GROUP
IRE
3203 Lightning St., Ste. 201 // Santa Maria, CA 93455
805.349.9695 // www.pleinairedg.com
CLP-01
CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPEPLAN
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
0 10 20 40
SCALE : 1" = 20'-0" NORTH
8TH STREET APARTMENTS
22418
Masatani
4646 8th Street
Guadalupe, California 93434
T: 805.284.5603
4646 8TH STREET // GUADALUPE STREET, CALIFORNIA 93434
2024.12.20
NORTH
N.T.S.
VICINITY MAP
SITE
8th St.
Pioneer Street
1. MINIMUM PLANT SIZES:
STREET TREES (24"BOX), SITE TREES (15 GAL.), SHRUBS (1 GAL.),
GROUNDCOVER (FLATS)
2. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED AS A PART OF SITE
CONSTRUCTION. SYSTEM SHALL BE UNDERGROUND, AUTOMATICWITH POP-UP SPRAY HEADS, "SMART" CONTROLLER AND AUTOMATIC RAIN SHUTOFF. LOW PRECIPITATION RATE HEADS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF.
3. POINT OF CONNECTION FOR WATER SUPPLY, SHALL BE BY A NEW LANDSCAPE SUB METER.
4. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 3" LAYER OF MEDIUM BARK MULCH AFTER INSTALLATION.
5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF GUADALUPE OR STATE OF CALIFORNIA MODEL WATER CONSERVATIONORDINANCE.
6. ALL PLANTING AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITY OF GUADALUPE STANDARDS AND CODES.
7. FOR SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL, AND GRADING/DRAINAGE
INFORMATION SEE PLANS BY OTHERS.
8. ALL AREAS BEYOND THE AREA OF WORK THAT ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION.
9. DRAWINGS ARE FOR DESIGN AND REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
10. TREES PLANTED IN AN AREA LESS THAN 8' WIDE SHALL BE INSTALLED
WITH A LINEAR ROOT BARRIER TO PROTECT AGAINST HARDSCAPE DAMAGE.
11. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY OF GUADALUPE APPROVED TREE LIST.
GENERAL NOTES
PLANT LEGEND
TREES
SYMBOL
T1
NAME
T2
SHRUBS
SYMBOL
S1
NAME
S2S3S4
S5S6
VINES
SYMBOL
V1
NAME
FICUS PUMILA
CREEPING FIG
GROUNDCOVERS
SYMBOL
G1
NAME
BARK MULCH
MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA
CAJEPUT TREE
ARBUTUS 'MARINA'
MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE (MULTI-TRUNK)
RHAMNUS 'EVE'S CASE'
EVE'S CASE COFFEEBERRY
DIETES BICOLOR
FORTNIGHT LILY
CEANOTHUS 'ANCHOR BAY'
ANCHOR BAY CEANOTHUS
FESTUCA 'ELIJAH'
ELIJAH BLUE FESCUE
LIMONIUM PEREZII
SEA LAVENDER
CISTUS 'SUNSET'
MAGENTA ROCKROSE S6
S3
S2
S4
S1
S5
G2 DECOMPOSED GRANITE
PROPOSED NEW UNITS
PROPOSED
NEW UNITS
PROPOSED
NEW UNITS
EXISTING UNITS
8TH STREET
35' SITE TRIANGLE (TYP.)
10' STREET TREE EASEMENT
3FT WALL3FT WALL6FT FENCE
D.G. PATIO
PICNIC TABLE
STEEL EDGE
PROPOSED FIRE ACCESS ROAD
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CMU WALL TO REMAIN
\\pleinaire420\Pleinaire Shared\Drawing File\Ravatt Albrecht\Masatani - 8th Street Guadalupe\Landscape\Conceptual\CLP.dwg SHEET NO.
DATE
OWNER
SHEET TITLE
PLEIN
DESIGN GROUP
IRE
3203 Lightning St., Ste. 201 // Santa Maria, CA 93455
805.349.9695 // www.pleinairedg.com
CLP-03
PLANT
IMAGERY
8TH STREET APARTMENTS
22418
Masatani
4646 8th Street
Guadalupe, California 93434
T: 805.284.5603
4646 8TH STREET // GUADALUPE STREET, CALIFORNIA 93434
2024.12.20
Marina Strawberry Tree Cajeput Tree Eve's Case Coffeeberry Bicolor Fornight Lily Anchor Bay Ceanothus Elijah Blue Fescue Sea Lavender Magenta Rockrose Decomposed Granite Picnic Table NOTE:
PLANT IMAGERY SHOWN IS REPRESENTATIVE OF ADESIGN CONCEPT ONLY. FINAL SELECTIONS MAY VARY. SEE CONCEPTUAL PLANTING LEGEND FOR
MORE INFORMATION.
\\pleinaire420\Pleinaire Shared\Drawing File\Ravatt Albrecht\Masatani - 8th Street Guadalupe\Landscape\Conceptual\CLP.dwg Agenda Item No. 12
REPORT TO THE GUADALUPE CITY COUNCIL
Agenda of January 28, 2025
__________________________________ _____________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:
Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: Amendment No. 5 to the agreement for services between the City of Guadalupe and Andrew Goodwin Designs(AGD) to partially redesign the plaza area to match the new easements granted to Caltrans.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-08 approving Amendment No. 5 to the agreement with AGD to complete a partial redesign of the plaza area where it ties into the new Caltrans easement.
BACKGROUND:
AGD was hired to complete the design work for the redevelopment of the Royal Theater and the two adjoining lots (now merged into one lot). Four previous amendments to the original agreement have been approved by the City Council. The history of these previous amendments has been reported to the City Council several times in previous staff reports, most recently at the Council meeting on Octobe 4, 2024, so there is no need to reiterate that history in this report. If any member of the Council or the public wishes to review this information, it can be found on the City’s website.
This current amendment (Amendment No. 5) is needed to redesign previously prepared plans for the Royal Theater plaza area due to several easements recently granted to Caltrans as part of its ADA and sidewalk improvement project on Hwys 1 and 166.
DISCUSSION:
During the design of the ADA and sidewalk improvement project on Guadalupe Street, Caltrans discovered that approximately four feet of the existing sidewalk adjacent to the Royal Theater was outside the Caltrans right-of-way. On November 26, 2024, the City Council approved a permanent easement to Caltrans at 836 and 848 Guadalupe Street (Royal Theatre) for the widened sidewalk.
The original AGD plans for the plaza went to the property line. The redesign will account for the new Caltrans easements and match the proposed sidewalk on Guadalupe Street.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the redesign of the plaza is $9,854.
Jeff van den Eikhof
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2025-08
2. Amendment No. 5 to Agreement between the City and AGD
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY GUADALUPE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO
THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GUADALUPE AND ANDREW GOODWIN DESIGN TO
PARTIALLY REDESIGN THE PLAZA AREA OF THE ROYAL THEATER PROJECT PLANS TO MATCH THE
RECENT EASEMENTS GRANTED TO CALTRANS
WHEREAS, the City Council entered an agreement with Andrew Goodwin Design (AGD) for design/engineering services for the Royal Theater on July 13, 2021, which agreement has been amended four previous times; and,
WHEREAS, Caltrans discovered that the existing sidewalk adjacent to the Royal Theater was constructed outside of their right-of-way and offered the City monies to acquire a permanent easement for the sidewalk, and;
WHEREAS, the City Council granted a permanent easement to Caltrans on the Royal Theater property to the back of the existing sidewalk on November 11, 2024, and, WHEREAS, AGD had already designed the plaza up to the property line at the Caltrans right-of-way, and, WHEREAS, the plaza must be redesigned to match the back of the sidewalk and new permanent easement; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe as follows:
SECTION 1: That Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement between the City of Guadalupe and Andrew Goodwin Design, attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is hereby approved; and SECTION 2: The Mayor is authorized to sign Amendment No. 5 on behalf of the City; and SECTION 3: The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance to the intent of this document is maintained.
In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 28th day of January 2025 by the following vote:
MOTION:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ATTACHMENT 1
I, Judy Wilson, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2025-08, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held January 28, 2025, and that same was approved and adopted.
ATTEST:
______________________________ ____________________________________ Judy Wilson, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF GUADALUPE AND
ANDREW GOODWIN DESIGNS
This Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Guadalupe and Andrew Goodwin Designs (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 28th day of January 2025, by and between the City of Guadalupe, a municipal corporation ("City") and Andrew Goodwin Designs ("AGD").
WHEREAS, City Council approved the original Agreement at its meeting on July 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, since then there have been four previous amendments to the Agreement for a variety of reasons; and
WHEREAS, recently, during the planning stages of Caltrans ADA and sidewalk improvement project on Hwys 1 and 166, Caltrans discovered that the existing sidewalk adjacent to the Royal Theater was constructed outside of their right-of-way and offered the City monies to acquire a permanent easement for the sidewalk, and;
WHEREAS, the City Council granted a permanent easement to Caltrans on the Royal Theater property to the back of the existing sidewalk on November 11, 2024, and, WHEREAS, AGD had already designed the plaza up to the property line at the Caltrans right-ofway, and, WHEREAS, the plaza must be redesigned to match the back of the sidewalk and new permanent easement; and
WHEREAS, AGD has prepared an “Add Service” agreement which constitutes the scope of services and provides for appropriate compensation, which document will be incorporated into the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and in mutual consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth in the Agreement, the parties agree as follows:
All of the terms and conditions of the Agreement including all prior amendments remain the same, except as follows:
1. The document attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Add Service Agreement”) is hereby to be included and incorporated to the extent appropriate as part of Attachment A (Scope of Services) and Attachment B (Compensation) to the Agreement.
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT 1
CITY: CONSULTANT:
CITY OF GUADALUPE ANDREW GOODWIN DESGINS
By: ____________________________ By: ___________________________ Ariston D. Julian, Mayor Andrew Goodwin
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________________
Philip Sinco, City Attorney
1238 M O N T E R E Y S T R E E T , S A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA 93401 - 8 0 5 . 4 3 9 . 1 6 1 1
ANDREW GOODWIN DESIGNS
DESIGN | ARCHITECTURE | PLANNING
ADD SERVICE AGREEMENT
ADD Service made as of: January 2, 2025, Revised January 18, 2025 ORIGINAL AGREEMENT made: August 7, 2024
Between the CLIENT: City of Guadalupe
918 Obispo Street
Guadalupe, CA 93434
and the CONSULTANT: Andrew Goodwin, AIA
Andrew Goodwin Designs
2050 Parker Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805-439-1611) for the following Project: Add Service for Street Improvements SECTION 1: SCOPE OF SERVICES:
1.1 Andrew Goodwin Designs (AGD)’ services consist of those described in this section. This agreement is for the ADDITIONAL design and engineering for street improvements that effect the sidewalk and plaza for the Royal Theater on 848 Guadalupe Street. This is due to the City revising the street right-of-way with Cal Trans after the original agreement was signed. This changes the scope of work at the sidewalk and the plaza.
1.2 All services performed outside of these services listed in the previous contract and below shall be considered Additional Services. Additional Services will be billed at an hourly rate or as agreed upon by the Client and Consultant(s).
SCOPE OF SERVIES BREAK-DOWN
Design Phase:
1. Design and engineering to improve the street at 848 Guadalupe Street to eliminate the driveway apron and reconstruct the sidewalk, curb, and gutter.
2. Adjustment of the plaza design to conform to the new sidewalk including civil engineering and landscape architecture
EXCLUSIONS
The exclusions included in the previous contract are still valid. No further exclusions are required.
SECTION 2: COMPENSATION
2.1 The work described in Section 1 will be billed as a lump sump by Andrew Goodwin Designs, and the work will be performed per the consultant fee plus a 10% markup for project management and contingency.
Engineering Fee: $3,190
Landscape Architecture Fee: $5,864
Architecture Fee: $900
TOTAL: $9,854
Note: Hourly rate/fees for professional services only and does not include Reimbursable Expenses. Printing will be charged in addition to this fee above.
EXHIBIT A
1238 M O N T E R E Y S T R E E T , S A N L U I S O B I S P O , CA 93401 - 8 0 5 . 4 3 9 . 1 6 1 1 SECTION 3: ACCEPTANCE
3.1 Commencement of the outlined work above may immediately after the receipt of this signed proposal, the initial payment indicated in Section 2, and a complete contract if client requires.
Your signature below indicates your acceptance of this agreement. This proposal is valid for 30 days.
Sincerely,
Andrew Goodwin, AIA, NCARB _________________________________________________________ Architect, Owner Client Acceptance Date Phone
Print Name:_______________________________________________
Agenda Item No. 13
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of January 28, 2025
________________________________ __________________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:
Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: Explore Consolidation of Guadalupe Transit Bus Service with Santa Maria Regional Transit RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-09, authorizing City staff to explore consolidation of the Guadalupe Flyer with the Santa Maria Regional Transit (SMRT).
BACKGROUND:
Municipalities are typically responsible for developing and managing their own local public transit systems. This involves navigating complex funding applications, overseeing contracts, and ensuring strict compliance with federal and state regulations – the primary funding source for these services.
Currently, Santa Maria and Guadalupe operate separate transit systems, each with its own administrative burdens. While some coordination exists, these parallel systems create inefficiencies. This is particularly problematic given the strong connection between the two communities and the reliance of residents on both transit agencies for daily needs.
DISCUSSION
Exploring Consolidation of Guadalupe Transit Services:
Recent challenges, such as the loss of key City and Contractor transit staff in Guadalupe and increasing regulatory demands beyond the scope of current work assignments, have made managing the Guadalupe Flyer more complicated in recent years. These challenges include:
• Difficulty meeting reporting requirements and developing an electric bus transition plan. • Challenges in administering grants and meeting deadlines. • Difficulty keeping up with growing demand and preparing for the upcoming expiration of the current transit operations contract.
A recent 2024 State of California TDA review and a previous (2017) regional integration study recommends the exploration of consolidating the two transit systems to improve efficiency, optimize resource allocation, and better serve the needs of the region.
Jeff van den Eikhof
Initial discussions between Santa Maria, Guadalupe, and the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) have focused on the potential benefits of SMRT fully integrating the Guadalupe Flyer into its existing service network.
Key Advantages of Consolidation:
• Streamlined Operations: Centralized management of routes, fares, and technology. • Improved Efficiency: Shared resources (fleet, staff, funding) and optimized resource allocation. • Enhanced Service: Seamless travel experience for riders between the two communities. • Stronger Administrative Capacity: Leverage SMRT’s experienced staff, existing contracts, and established processes.
• Improved Compliance: Better equipped to meet evolving regulations and funding requirements.
Moving Forward:
The idea of exploring a consolidation would be to see what benefits and challenges Santa Maria Regional Transit (SMRT) would assume in the administrative responsibility of Guadalupe’s transit routes for both communities. While Guadalupe could ultimately relinquish direct administrative duties, they would continue to support the service through reallocated transit funding historically provided to Guadalupe.
This would streamline funding management processes, operations by centralizing route management, fare structures, and the faster onboarding of rider-centric technological advancements. Benefits include improved efficiency through shared resources (fleet, staff, funding), better data collection for service planning, and a more seamless travel experience for riders traveling between the two communities.
Alternatives
City Council may elect for staff not to explore, with SMRT and SBCAG staff, the idea of consolidating the Guadalupe transit service into SMRT services. However, this alternative is not recommended because the two communities are both economically intertwined. Additionally, the City’s contract with SMOOTH expires at the end of the fiscal year. If the consolidation does not occur, City staff will have to secure a new transit contract through a competitive process this year and every two years thereafter.
Impact on the Community
There are no anticipated impacts to either Santa Maria or Guadalupe riders due to the exploratory conversation of the Guadalupe transit service with SMRT. Should consolidation be ultimately recommended, a public participation process would be initiated before making a recommendation to either City Council. Should consolidation be recommended, it would improve the service delivery capabilities for Guadalupe residents accessing schools, job sites, and commercial opportunities in Santa Maria.
FISCAL IMPACT
There are no impacts on the City’s General Fund by taking this action. The Transit Program is an Enterprise Fund sustained solely on its own Federal and State funding sources and locally generated revenues (i.e., fares). Management of the transit program by SMRT would relieve the existing burdens on staff time.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2025-09
2. Letter of Intent – Explore Service Consolidation
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY GUADALUPE AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF TO
EXPLORE CONSOLIDATION OF THE GUADALUPE TRANSIT BUS SERVICE WITH SANTA MARIA
REGIONAL TRANSIT
WHEREAS, the City of Guadalupe is responsible for operating the Guadalupe Flyer; and, WHEREAS, a recent State of California TDA review and a previous regional integration study recommends the exploration of consolidating the Guadalupe Flyer with the Santa Maria Regional Transit (SMRT); and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe as follows:
SECTION 1: The Mayor is authorized to sign a letter addressed to the City of Santa Maria formally expressing a willingness to jointly explore consolidating Guadalupe’s transit service with Santa Maria Regional Transit.
SECTION 2: City Staff is authorized to work with Santa Maria and SBCAG staff to implement the exploration, including a series of meetings, data analysis, stakeholder engagement, and other related activities.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained.
In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 28th day of January 2025 by the following vote:
MOTION:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
I, Judy Wilson, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2025-09, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held January 28, 2025, and that same was approved and adopted.
ATTEST:
______________________________ ____________________________________ Judy Wilson, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
ATTACHMENT 1
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
Letter of Intent
From: City of Guadalupe
To: City of Santa Maria
Date: February XX, 2025
Subject: Intent to Explore Consolidation of Transit Services Consistent with the City Council Action taken at the January 28, 2025 meeting, this letter formally expresses the City of Guadalupe’s willingness to jointly explore with the City of Santa Maria the potential of consolidating Guadalupe’s transit services with Santa Maria Regional Transit (SMRT).
Background:
Municipalities are responsible for developing and managing local public transit, a complex undertaking involving funding applications, contract oversight, and strict regulatory compliance.
Currently, Santa Maria and Guadalupe operate separate transit systems. However, a growing trend is the strong interdependence of both community’s transit systems by the transit riding public and only modest ability to coordinate the two transit systems.
Transit Challenges:
Recent challenges, including staffing shortages and increasing regulatory demands, have made managing a public transit system even more difficult. These challenges include:
• Difficulty meeting reporting requirements and developing an electric bus transition plan. • Challenges in administering grants and meeting deadlines. • Difficulty keeping up with growing demand and preparing for the upcoming expiration of the current transit operations contract.
The anticipated outcomes of a recent (2024) State of California TDA review, an existing 2017 Regional Integration Study, and current SBCAG Transit Technical Advisory Committee discussions amongst transit operators recommend exploring the idea of transit system consolidation to enhance efficiency, optimize resource allocation, and to better serve the region and its riders.
Potential Benefits of Consolidation:
• Streamlined Operations: Centralized management of routes, fares, and technology. • Improved Efficiency: Shared resources (fleet, staff, funding) and optimized resource allocation.
• Enhanced Service: Seamless travel experience for riders between the two communities.
ATTACHMENT 2
• Stronger Administrative Capacity: Leverage SMRT’s experienced staff, existing contracts, and established processes.
• Improved Compliance: Better equipped to meet evolving regulations and funding requirements.
Moving Forward:
Staff will coordinate meetings, exploring the idea of consolidating transit services that would analyze benefits and challenges for both Cities if Santa Maria Regional Transit (SMRT) assumed the administrative responsibility of Guadalupe’s transit routes.
We believe exploring this opportunity presents significant potential for improved public transportation services for Santa Maria and Guadalupe. We look forward to collaborating with the City of Santa Maria and other stakeholders to investigate this potential partnership further.
Sincerely,
[Name and Title]
City of Guadalupe
Wine Improvement District Page 1 of 3 January 28, 2025
Agenda Item No. 14
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of January 28, 2025
_______________________________ __________________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:
Larry Appel, Contract Planning Director Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Granting Consent to the County of Santa Barbara to Establish the Santa Barbara County Wine Improvement District (SBCWID) and Include the City of Guadalupe in the Established SBCWID
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Wine Improvement Districts (WIDs) utilize the efficiencies of private sector operation in the marketbased promotion of assessed businesses. These special assessment districts allow assessed business owners to organize their efforts to increase promotions & engagement. Business owners within the WID fund the WID, and those funds are used to provide services that are desired by and benefit the assessed businesses within the WID. Wine tasting facility business owners decided to pursue formation of the SBCWID in order to establish a revenue source devoted to promoting Santa Barbara County wine testing facilities. If established, the SBCWID would generate approximately $1,650,000 on an annual basis for promotion of wine tasting facilities specific to Santa Barbara County.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Receive presentation from staff; and
2) Accept public testimony and close public comment; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-10
BACKGROUND:
The SBCWID is a benefit assessment district proposed to continue a revenue source to help fund destination sales and marketing promotions for Santa Barbara County wine tasting facilities. This approach has been used successfully in other destination areas throughout the state to increase assessed wine tasting facility sales and revenue. The proposed SBCWID includes all wine tasting facilities, existing and in the future, located within the boundaries of the County, which includes the unincorporated areas of the County, and the cities of Carpinteria, Santa Barbara, Goleta, Solvang, Buellton, Lompoc, Santa Maria, and Guadalupe. Because the proposed SBCWID will include the City of Guadalupe, consent must be granted by the City Council of Guadalupe in order for the City of Guadalupe to be included in the creation, operation and future renewals of the SBCWID.
Wine Improvement District Page 2 of 3 January 28, 2025
DISCUSSION:
In California, WIDs are primarily formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. This law allows for the creation of special benefit assessment districts to raise funds within a specific geographic area. The key difference between WIDs and other special benefit assessment districts is that funds raised are returned to the private non-profit corporation governing the WID.
WID benefits:
Funds cannot be diverted for other government programs; They are customized to fit the needs of each destination; They allow for a wide range of services; including: promotion, engagement, and sales lead generation;
They are designed, created and governed by those who will pay the assessment; and They provide a stable funding source for promotion of assessed businesses.
The Management District Plan includes the proposed boundary of the SBCWID, a service plan and budget and a proposed means of governance. The SBCWID will include all wine tasting facilities, existing and in the future, located within the boundaries of the County, which includes the unincorporated areas of the County, and the cities of Carpinteria, Santa Barbara, Goleta, Solvang, Buellton, Lompoc, Santa Maria, and Guadalupe.
The annual assessment rate is one percent (1%) of gross sales revenue of assessed wine tasting facilities.
Based on the benefit received, assessments will not be collected on purchases made outside of the state of California or purchases made pursuant to contracts executed prior to March 1, 2025. Revenue generated from the SBCWID is intended only to provide programs and services for assessed businesses, all of which are located in California. Sales made outside of the state of California are not subject to assessment due to a lack of benefit. Assessment dollars will not be spent on any programs or activities to benefit individual wine tasting facilities outside of the state of California. Assessment dollars may be spent outside of California to elevate the notoriety of the County as a premier winery destination with the desired outcome of increased in-person visitation to businesses paying the assessment.
The proposed SBCWID will have a five (5) year term, beginning March 1, 2025, or as soon as possible thereafter, and ending five (5) years from its start date. The assessment will be implemented beginning March 1, 2025. Once per year beginning on the anniversary of SBCWID formation there is a thirty (30) day period in which business owners paying fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessment may protest and begin proceedings to terminate the SBCWID.
A third-party collection agency will be responsible for collecting the assessment on a quarterly basis from each assessed wine tasting facility. The third-party collection agency shall forward the assessments to the Santa Barbara County Vintners Association, which will have the responsibility of managing SBCWID programs as provided in the Management District Plan. The third-party collection agency shall be paid a fee of up to two percent (2%) of the amount of assessment collected to cover its costs of collection and administration.
Wine Improvement District Page 3 of 3 January 28, 2025
ATTACHMENT:
1. Resolution No. 2025-10
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-10
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE GRANTING CONSENT TO THE
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA TO ESTABLISH THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY WINE
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (SBCWID) AND INCLUDE THE CITY OF GUADALUPE IN THE ESTABLISHED SBCWID
WHEREAS, the Property and Business Improvement Law of 1994, Streets and Highways Code § 36600 et seq., authorizes the County of Santa Barbara (County) to establish business improvement districts for the purposes of promoting assessed businesses; and WHEREAS, the Santa Barbara County Vintners Association, wine tasting facility owners, and representatives from the County have met to consider the formation of the SBCWID; and WHEREAS, the Santa Barbara County Vintners Association has drafted a Management District Plan (Plan) which sets forth the proposed boundary of the SBCWID, a service plan and budget, and a proposed means of governance; and
WHEREAS, the proposed SBCWID includes all wine tasting facilities, existing and in the future, located within the boundaries of the County, which includes the unincorporated areas of the County and the cities of Carpinteria, Santa Barbara, Goleta, Solvang, Buellton, Lompoc, Santa Maria, and Guadalupe; and
WHEREAS, the County has requested consent to form the SBCWID in the City of Guadalupe with adoption of Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 24-01301 dated December 17, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe, that:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2. Santa Barbara County is hereby granted consent to include the City of Guadalupe in the SBCWID, for the formation of the SBCWID and future renewals.
SECTION 3: The Clerk of the City of Guadalupe is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Clerk of the County of Santa Barbara.
SECTION 4: This Resolution is effective upon its adoption.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.
ATTACHMENT 1
2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 28th day of January 2025 by the following vote:
MOTION:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
I, Judy Wilson, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2025-10, has been duly signed by the mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held January 28, 2025, and that same was approved and adopted.
ATTEST:
______________________________ __________________________________ Judy Wilson, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
Agenda Item No. 15
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of January 28, 2025
_______________________________ _________________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:
Michael Cash, Director of Public Safety Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: EV Charging Station Parking Restrictions
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-11 to limit the amount of time an electric vehicle may stay parked in a designated EV charging station parking space on City property.
BACKGROUND:
Recently, the City received complaints about certain electric vehicles occupying electric vehicle (EV charging stations/parking spaces on City-owned property. Specifically, the complaints were that these vehicles parked in these designated EV charging parking spaces so long that other EV vehicle owners were unable to use them to charge their own vehicles. City staff has always taken the position that EV charging stations are intended to benefit as many EVs as possible and that these spaces were not intended to be used as “storage” spaces for EVs beyond the time required to charge them.
This position is consistent with state law. California Vehicle Code section 22511(c)(1) provides, in relevant part, that a local jurisdiction “may cause the removal of a vehicle from a stall or space designated [for electric vehicle charging] …if the vehicle is not connected for electric charging purposes.” Once the time required to charge the vehicle has transpired, it is no longer considered to be “connected for electric charging purposes.”
DISCUSSION:
Guadalupe Municipal Code (GMC) section 10.24.210 provides, in relevant part, as follows:
B. Electric Vehicle Parking Regulations. No person shall park or cause to be parked or allow to remain standing any vehicle at an electric vehicle charging station located on any street or in any parking facility, unless the vehicle is an electric vehicle, is charging, and has not exceeded any applicable parking time limit posted at the electric vehicle charging station.
C. Signs shall be erected and maintained designating the restricted parking spaces under the provisions of this section and under Vehicle Code Section 22511.
Michael Cash
The City does not have any specific time restrictions for its EV charging station parking spaces, but the GMC clearly permits them. Since time restrictions are already permitted by the GMC, the City Council may establish them by a resolution.
City staff is recommending a maximum time limit of eight (8) hours for parking at any City designated EV charging parking space. These spaces are currently located at the Veterans Memorial Plaza parking lot and at the parking lot at the Senior Center. Unfortunately, the EV chargers at theses parking spaces are not “rapid” chargers. These chargers (ClipperCreek HCS-40P chargers), deliver up to 7.7 kW, and this means that it takes about 11 hours to fully recharge a vehicle from 1% to 100%, per the manufacturer.
Many cities have a time limit of four (4) hours for parking at public EV charging stations, and the City Council could certainly approve a four (4) hour limit rather than staff’s recommendation of an eight (8) hour limit (or it could choose some other time restriction), but staff believes that eight (8) hours is fair given the length of time it takes to charge an EV with these charges. An eight (8) hour charge from 1% will get a vehicle up to about 65-75% of its maximum charge which should be sufficient for most purposes, yet it will allow other uses opportunities to use these spaces as well.
FISCAL IMPACT
None aside from the cost of new signage to inform uses of the time restriction.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2025-11 entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Guadalupe Setting a Time Limit on the Use of Public Parking Spaces Designated for the Charging of Electric Vehicles.” RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE SETTING A TIME LIMIT ON
THE USE OF PUBLIC PARKING SPACES DESIGNATED FOR THE CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code section 22511(a) provides that a city in possession of an offstreet parking facility may designate stalls or spaces in such facility for the exclusive purpose of charging and parking a vehicle that is connected for electric charging purposes; and WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code section 22511(c)(1) provides that a city which has designated stalls or spaces for the exclusive purpose of charging and parking a vehicle that is connected for electric charging purposes may cause the removal of vehicles from such stalls or spaces if the vehicle is not connected for electric charging purposes; and WHEREAS, Guadalupe Municipal Code (GMC) section 10.24.210 provides that no person shall park or cause to be parked or allow to remain standing any vehicle at an electric vehicle charging station located on any street or in any parking facility, unless the vehicle is an electric vehicle, is charging, and has not exceeded any applicable parking time limit posted at the electric vehicle charging station; and
WHEREAS, City staff has received complaints that some electric vehicle owners are parking their vehicles longer than the time it takes to charge them and, as a result, are making it difficult for other electric vehicle owners to use these spaces; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to set a time limit for parking at the City-owned electric vehicle charging stations pursuant to GMC section 10.24.210; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the particular chargers at its electric vehicle charging stations require about 11 hours for an electric vehicle to be charged from 1% to 100%, and that it is fair and equitable to limit the maximum amount of time a vehicle can park at an electric vehicle charging station to eight (8) hours as that will be adequate for most users’ purposes and will increase the opportunities for more electric vehicle owners to use these spaces.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Guadalupe resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. All parking of electric vehicles in spaces at City-owned electric vehicle charging stations for the purpose of charging shall be limited to a maximum period of eight (8) hours.
SECTION 2. Appropriate signage pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 22511 informing users of these spaces about the eight (8) hour time limit and that any vehicles occupying such spaces that are not connected to the chargers and is not charging shall be subject to removal by towing shall be posted prior to enforcing the time limit.
ATTACHMENT 1
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of January 2025, by the following roll call vote:
MOTION:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
I, Judy Wilson, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2025-11, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held January 28, 2025, and that same was approved and adopted.
ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________ Judy Wilson, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
Agenda Item No. 16
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of January 28, 2025
_______________________________
Prepared by:
Todd Bodem, City Administrator
SUBJECT: City Council appointments to various boards and committees RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Mayor appoints City Council Members to various boards and committees representing the City of Guadalupe.
DISCUSSION:
In general, the role of a board or committee representative is to provide high-level oversight of an agency’s activities and performance. The City of Guadalupe has the ability and responsibility of representing city residents in a minimum of six boards or committees.
The purpose of Guadalupe elected officials serving on the county, state or other publicly funded boards is to ensure that resources allocated by the City of Guadalupe, to these agencies, are managed according to established city, county, state, and federal guidelines. Established committees, boards, and agencies, need a board or committee representation because while conducting business, boards, or committees, can make costly errors. Having active directors or committee members can prevent the board or committee from making those mistakes; therefore, the absence of representation on board of directors or established committees is a mistake.
Role of a Council Member – City of Guadalupe
Guadalupe City Council members are elected or appointed to represent the residents of Guadalupe for ongoing city functions and to represent residents in committees in an advisory capacity to ensure that the best interest of residents remains a high priority.
There are a minimum of six Boards or Commissions established by different agencies including:
1. The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments
2. Santa Barbara County – Air Pollution Control District
3. Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA)
4. Twitchell Management Authority
5. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (JPIA)
6. Guadalupe Senior Center Advisory Committee.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Appointments to Boards and Committees List
CITY OF GUADALUPE BOARD APPOINTMENTS 2023-2024
Effective: April 11, 2023 – December 2024
2023-2024
BOARD/COMMISSION PRIMARY ALTERNATE
Santa Barbara County Association of
Governments (SBCAG)
Ariston Julian Christina Hernandez
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District (APCD)
Ariston Julian Christina Hernandez
Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA) Megan Lizalde
Whitney Furness
Shannon Sweeney
Todd Bodem
Twitchell Management Authority Christina Hernandez Megan Lizalde California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Eugene Costa Jr. Gilbert Robles Central Coast Community Energy (3C Energy) Ariston Julian Eugene Costa Jr.
Guadalupe Senior Center Advisory Committee Ariston Julian Megan Lizalde ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF GUADALUPE BOARD APPOINTMENTS 2023-2024
Effective: January 28, 2025 – December 8, 2026
2025-2026
BOARD/COMMISSION PRIMARY ALTERNATE
Santa Barbara County Association of
Governments (SBCAG)
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District (APCD)
Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA)
Twitchell Management Authority
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority
Central Coast Community Energy (3C Energy)
Guadalupe Senior Center Advisory Committee
!
"#"$%&'(
)
*++,-./012+3+456.,3+7258392051:6;+1<3=6.,3> *++,-./0.62=144:<6.?+.+1,@A1>=>1.5/+.+2144:<6.<495+B:C66.> D E
F
GHI1.,1J12B121 K
"# I1.,1*12-1 "LMNOPQROSTUVWXYUXTY G#ZZ[\]\#^ZZ 8J_ %'"# I1.,1J12B121 ^)GL I1.,1*12-1 %
G$ I1.,1J12B121 F
G` I1.,1*12-1 F
)
GL I1.,1J12B121
&
"G I1.,1*12-1 ^Ga I1.,1J12B121 b
GH I1.,1*12-1 c
"# I1.,1J12B121 D Ga I1.,1*12-1
cd
J61256;I9e+2?-0620f+12-./g66=
h
h
@Aij10,k.1e1=9I,2++,lm,3n4662 opqrpsptuptpvwxyz{|{
g+=6,+8+0,-=6.:}6<1,-6.~ I1.,1*12-1J61256;I9e+2?-06206.;+2+.<+g66= i@@j10,}1+0-5+121:lI1.,1*12-1lk7mii
cd
J61256;I9e+2?-0620f+12-./g66= %
h
i@@j10,}1+0-5+121: I1.,1*12-1lk7mii g+=6,+8+0,-=6.:}6<1,-6.~ I1.,1J12B121J61256;I9e+2?-0620f+12-./g66=
Board of Directors
2025 Meeting Schedule
Meetings are held on the 3rd Thursday of the months indicated below. Meetings convene at 1:00 p.m. and generally conclude by 3:30 p.m. Agendas will be posted a minimum of 72 hours prior to each meeting on the District’s website at https://www.ourair.org/apcd-board-of-directors-agenda/ Live countywide television coverage available on County of Santa Barbara TV Channel 20 and online at: http://sbcounty.granicus.com/player/camera/4?publish_id=35&redirect=true Meeting Date Meeting Location Remote Testimony
January 16
Board of Supervisors’ Hearing Room
105 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
Board of Supervisors’
Hearing Room
Santa Maria
March 20
Board of Supervisors’ Hearing Room
105 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
Board of Supervisors’
Hearing Room
Santa Maria
May 15
Board of Supervisors’ Hearing Room
105 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
Board of Supervisors’
Hearing Room
Santa Maria
June 26
(Special Meeting)
Board of Supervisors’ Hearing Room
511 East Lakeside Parkway
Santa Maria, California 93455
Board of Supervisors’
Hearing Room
Santa Barbara
August 21
Board of Supervisors’ Hearing Room
511 East Lakeside Parkway
Santa Maria, California 93455
Board of Supervisors’
Hearing Room
Santa Barbara
October 16
Board of Supervisors’ Hearing Room
511 East Lakeside Parkway
Santa Maria, California 93455
Board of Supervisors’
Hearing Room
Santa Barbara
December 18
Board of Supervisors’ Hearing Room
511 East Lakeside Parkway
Santa Maria, California 93455
Board of Supervisors’
Hearing Room
Santa Barbara
2025
Board Meetings
Our board of directors meets on the fourth Thursday of each month at 9:00am. The board may also schedule special meetings at other times when needed, and will post notice according to the Brown Act.
• January 23, 2025
• February 27, 2025
• March 27, 2025
• April 24, 2025
• May 22, 2025
• June 26, 2025
• July 24, 2025
• August 28, 2025
• September 25, 2025
• October 23, 2025
https://www.ccwa.com/