Agenda packet — Hanford City Council, September 19, 2023 (part 1 of 3)

City Council Meeting
Agenda
September 19, 2023
7:00 PM – Regular Meeting
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

Council Members will meet in-person in the Council
Chambers. The meeting will also be lived streamed on the City’s website: http://livestream.hanford.city/

4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Study Sessions are considered Special Meetings under the Brown Act. Accordingly, comments from the public are limited to items listed on the agenda (GC 54954.3a). Public Comment will be accepted during each agenda item. A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Presentation from Lechowicz & Tseng Municipal Consultants on progress of a Rate Study for water, wastewater and storm drain rates and Council direction to staff and consultants to assist with the completion of the Study.

B. Preview of the Active Transportation Plan, including the scope of work, timeline, community outreach, and it’s relationship with the Reconnecting Communities Program CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC 54957)
TITLE: Police Chief
CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

ROLL CALL:

INVOCATION:

Albert Toralez

Page 1 of 474 ends

FLAG SALUTE:

CLOSED SESSION ACTION REPORT:

RECOGNITION:

Oath of office and Badge Pinning Ceremony for Officer Robert Leist, Officer Michael Crawmer, Officer Dario Salazar, Officer Cyrena Lopez, and Officer Evan Gonzales
COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

PUBLIC COMMENT:

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

A. Procedural Waiver: Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title the only.

B. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the August 1, 2023 Meeting C. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the August 15, 2023 Meeting D. Administration: Approval of a 5-year contract with Brandley Engineering, of Loomis, California, to provide Airport Engineering, Planning and Construction Management Services for State and Federally funded Airport Improvement Projects.

E. IT: Approval of the renewal of the three-year Microsoft software licensing from Dell Computer Corporation in the amount of $244,154.58
F. Public Works: Approval of the Notice of Completion, for a final project cost of $3,594,350.00, for the Drilling and Development of Water Wells 51 and 52 Project, by ZIM Industries, Inc., and Authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with Kings County Recorder’s Office.

G. Public Works: Approval of the Suggested Routes to School plans for Hanford Elementary School District and Saint Rose-Thomas McCarthy School for the upcoming 2023-2024 school year.

H. Public Works: Approval of the Suggested Routes to School plans for Frontier Elementary School, Pioneer Elementary School, and Pioneer Middle School for the upcoming 2023- 2024 school year.

I. Fire: Approval of the acceptance of an award from the 2022 State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) funding, in the amount of $49,115 for the Hanford Fire Department; Appropriation and Authorization to utilize the funding to purchase Unmanned Aircraft (Drones) and Incident Command Training.

Page 2 of 474 ends

PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Community Development: Public hearing to consider any comments received regarding the 2022-23 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and Approval of the submittal of the Program Year 2022 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report.

GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Public Works: Approval of a two-year contract, with three one year options for a total of five (5) years, with Sweeping Corporation of America (Visalia, CA) in the amount of $632,660.07 and approve designating four City owned street sweepers as surplus and authorizing their sale.

COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS:

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on their activities. In addition, subject to Council Policies and Procedures, they may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2)
A. Council Future Agenda Items
B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

September 20 & 21: Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Walk Assessment Open House in the Civic Auditorium More info
September 20-22: League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo in Sacramento
September 23 & 30: Free Fitness Court Classes 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. at Hidden Valley Park
October 3: Regular City Council Meeting
October 3: Hanford Police Department 2023 National Night Out 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. in Civic Park
October 7 & 8: Renaissance Fair 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. in Civic Park ADJOURNMENT:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available to public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, during normal business hours. Such agendas are also available at the city’s website, www.cityofhanfordca.com subject to staff’s ability to post the agenda before the meeting.

If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office, 559-585-2515, 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, at least 2 days prior to the meeting {28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II}

Page 3 of 474 ends

4.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/19/2023 AGENDA SECTION: STUDY SESSION

SUBJECT:

Presentation from Lechowicz & Tseng Municipal Consultants on progress of a Rate Study for water, wastewater and storm drain rates and Council direction to staff and consultants to assist with the completion of the Study.

RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation: That City Council receive a presentation from Lechowicz & Tseng Municipal Consultants on progress of a Rate Study for water, wastewater and storm drain rates and provide direction to staff and consultants for completion.

Recommended Motion: Provide direction to staff and consultants for the Rate Study.

BACKGROUND:

Utility operations in water, sewer and storm drain are self-supporting enterprise funds that provide services for a fee. Charges for service through rates are the primary source of funding for operations and also fund a significant portion of the capital improvement program which includes the debt service (principal and interest) for bonds issued to fund these projects. Developer fees are the other funding source for capital projects. However, impact fees paid by developers are legally limited to addressing the impacts caused by the impacts of the developers' projects. For example, a project's impact fees may not be utilized to address normal wear and tear to infrastructure improvements that are not caused by that project.

It has been five years since water rate adjustments. The last water rate increase was July 1, 2018 (adopted in Resolution No. 15-60-R on December 15, 2015). The last sewer/storm rate increase was July 1, 2011 (adopted in Resolution No. 09-77-R on November 17, 2009) over twelve years ago.

Without updating rates the City will not have long term sustainability.

City Council has the authority to approve rate changes when necessary to ensure the continued recovery of costs for services and to secure reinvestment into the system infrastructure for long term sustainability.

Proposition 218 (Prop 218), approved in 1996, adds Article XIII D (Voter Approval for Local Tax Levies) to the California Constitution. All property-related fees, such as water, wastewater and storm drain fees and charges, must meet Prop 218’s requirements. It applies to most utility charges and fees; however, electric and gas utility charges were specifically exempted from the definition of property-related charges in the statute. The City is required to provide notice of proposed increases to the sewer, water and refuse collection service fees and charges to all affected ratepayers and record receipt of all written protests during a public hearing. Prop 218 prohibits increases to fees and

Page 4 of 474 ends

charges if a majority of the affected ratepayers submit written opposition to proposed increases.

The City's utilities are faced with many current and future challenges including aging infrastructure, preserving groundwater supply, adapting to changing water and wastewater quality regulations, and increased operational and capital costs. A growing proportion of Hanford's utility infrastructure is aging beyond its expected useful life. For example, the expected useful life of water distribution pipeline is 40 years. Hanford's operational costs are not immune to the impacts of inflation, which increase construction and equipment costs as well. In addition, adequate fund balance must be maintained to maintain applicable bond requirements and sustain operations in event of a fiscal emergency.

The consultant Lechowicz & Tseng and staff will present to Council a preliminary look at the needs of the water and sewer enterprises and seek Council's direction on how to draft a final report before final public notification and public hearings. Per Government Code Sections 53750 and 53751, the California Legislature has determined that, for purposes of Proposition 218, "sewer" includes sanitary sewer and storm water collection and disposal systems. As a result, increases to storm water fees are subject to Proposition 218's "majority protest" rules and do not require voter approval. Any new rates (if warranted) are recommended to be in place by January 1, 2024.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact at this time. City Council's direction today will help to shape how the City is able to adequately fund water and sewer operations and capital needs.

The proposed five-year water utility rate plan will fund future operating and capital costs, maintain reserve levels and financial metrics that comply with approved fiscal and reserve policies, and maintain current bond ratings to keep current and potential borrowing costs for capital investments low.

Based on Council direction today, staff and the consultant will bring back an updated draft study for consideration to prepare all documents necessary for public noticing of a rate proposal, to update proposed rate schedules to reflect changes due to the rate proposal, and to update any other documents necessary for the public hearing. New rates would be proposed to be effective as of January 1, 2024.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

Page 5 of 474 ends

4.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/19/2023 AGENDA SECTION: STUDY SESSION

SUBJECT:

Preview of the Active Transportation Plan, including the scope of work, timeline, community outreach, and it’s relationship with the Reconnecting Communities Program

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: The Council receive a presentation on the Active Transportation Plan and overview of the Reconnecting Communities Program and the proposed project for this funding cycle.

Recommended Motion:

BACKGROUND:

On October 27, 2022, the City of Hanford submitted a Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant application to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), requesting $252,143 to create an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) to update the 2016 Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. In May 2023, the City was awarded $253,499 to create an ATP.

The existing bicycle and pedestrian networks within the City of Hanford are disjointed and incomplete, with high-stress segments, missing sections of sidewalk and bicycle facilities, and significant barriers (Highway 198 and UPRR Railroad) that lack clear, safe, and comfortable crossings for active transportation users. Additionally, the City of Hanford is poised for significant growth over the next decade from the California High-Speed Rail Kings/Tulare station, currently under construction on the City's eastern edge. This presents an opportunity to leverage this significant regional transportation asset and facilitate a more significant modal shift towards active transportation.

The City of Hanford will develop an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) to provide the community with a clear roadmap to guide investments in non-motorized infrastructure, policies, and programs. The Plan will enhance bicyclist and pedestrian safety, facilitate modal shifts out of personal vehicles, and improve the quality of life for Hanford's large disadvantaged community. Half the population (29,651 people) live in poor census tracts (scoring in the bottom 10.8% according to the Healthy Places Index and CalEnviroscreen 4.0 scores from 91-99). Hanford does not have a robust multimodal network (Class I, Class IV, and no buffered Class II bike lanes; standard Class II bike lanes exist on only three streets). There is currently no dedicated space for bicyclists to cross Highway 198 safely, thus creating a barrier between high-poverty neighborhoods and the majority of essential services and jobs.

Furthermore, 13 of 16 Class III bike routes are high-speed (35 mph and up) roadways with no

Page 6 of 474 ends

dedicated space or lane markings. As a result, residents suffer from high crash rates within disadvantaged communities. Despite the lack of connected, comfortable routes, people living in underprivileged areas use active transportation more frequently than 45.5% of all California census tracts (Attachment 2B-3). This Plan will engage the public with a focus on hearing from historically marginalized stakeholders to reflect their needs.

The City will invite participation from the Kings County Action Organization, Tachi Yokut Tribe, local businesses and employers, Kings County Association of Governments, and Caltrans District 6. In addition, the Plan will identify first/last mile to transit connections to align with the forthcoming California High-Speed Rail (HSR) Kings/Tulare Station.

The final Plan will include a prioritized list of recommendations, including planning level cost estimates and implementation strategy (see attached Work Plan). In addition, the City will refine the top three priority projects into project concepts, including 15% design-level concepts for future grant applications.

This project will thoroughly review the existing conditions within the City of Hanford and gather feedback from the public to identify existing issues, concerns, and deficiencies for active transportation users. The project will evaluate current levels of traffic stress, equity considerations, demand, and mode shift potential in addition to specific locations identified by the public through an interactive mapping exercise. The project will ultimately produce an Active Transportation Plan for the City, which includes a prioritized list of active transportation infrastructure projects and non- infrastructure programs/policies for improving active transportation in the City of Hanford, as well as implementation guidance.

We are currently implementing Task 2, Public Outreach and Data Gathering. Task 2 includes the following:

• Public Engagement Plan
• Equity Framework
• Active Transportation Advisory Committee
• Pop-Up Events
• Project Website and Online Engagement
• Public Outreach Signage
• Community Walking Audit

Attachments:

ATP Cost and Schedule
ATP Scope of Work
FISCAL IMPACT:

The Active Transportation Plan is fully funded through the Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant, funded by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), In the amount of $252,143.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. ATP Cost and Schedule

2. ATP Scope of Work

Page 7 of 474 ends

Page 8 of 474 ends

City of Hanford Active Transportation Plan

J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J 01 $8,500
02 $7,200
1 $13,750
2 $78,416
3 $41,530
4 $10,625
5 $41,050
6 $34,572
7 $16,500
$252,143
Does your agency plan to request reimburesement for indirect costs? Project Concept Plans
California Department of Transportation
Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

COST AND SCHEDULE
FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25
Task
#
2022/2023
City of Hanford
Grant Amount*Task Title
FY 2022/23
Sustainable Communities Grant
Does your agency plan to use the Tapered Match approach for invoicing purposes? Non-Infrastructure and Programs
Project Administration
(no more than 5% of total grant funds)
Consultant Procurement
Project Planning & Coordination
Public Outreach & Data Gathering
Community Needs Assessment-User Analysis
Development and Implementation of the ATP
Draft and Final Plan
Totals
* Use only whole dollars in the financial information fields. Dollar amounts must be rounded up/down and decimals should not be shown.

Yes
No
Yes
No

Page 9 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 1
Scope of Work
Task 01 Project Administration
The following tasks will be performed by the City of Hanford under this task:
• Conduct Project kick-off meeting with Caltrans at the start of the grant • Invoicing and quarterly reporting to Caltrans
Task 01 Deliverables:
• Caltrans / City of Hanford Kick-off meeting (agenda, goals, agreements, and schedules) and meeting notes • Monthly invoicing to Caltrans
• Quarterly reporting to Caltrans

Task 02 Consultant Procurement
The following tasks will be performed by the City of Hanford under this task:
• Develop Request for Proposals for CONSULTANT to assist in the development of the Active Transportation Plan • Coordinate with Caltrans to develop approved RFP
• Conduct Procurement following Caltrans guidance
Task 02 Deliverables:
• Executed contract with CONSULTANT to complete Active Transportation Plan following Tasks 1 – 7 below.

Task 1 Project Planning & Coordination

KICK-OFF MEETING
The CONSULTANT team will plan and facilitate a project kick -off meeting to clarify the project scope, background, expectations, and measures of success. CONSULTANT will prepare the agenda and meeting notes. Recommended objectives for the kick -off meeting include:
• Establish communication channels and protocols
• Review project objectives
• Refine project work plan and schedule
• Identify known preliminary issues
• Develop list of background data/plans to request and review

PROJECT COORDINATION
Throughout the project, there will be ongoing coordination between the CONSULTANT team and t he Hanford City Staff.

CONSULTANT Project Manager will be in regular communication with the City Project Manager – including email, phone, and written communications to keep the City apprised of progress. CONSULTANT’s overall project management services will include:
• General project management. CONSULTANT will administer the project contract, coordinate personnel, prepare and maintain the project schedule and budget, and prepare invoicing. • Quality assurance and quality control. Each of submittal will be reviewed by the Principal-in-Charge and a copy editor to see that the City quality standards are met. CONSULTANT should demonstrate that they will utilize senior level staff

Page 10 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 2
for all submittal reviews, and clearly communicate project requirements to the entire project team so all team members understand the project expectations.
• Project schedule. CONSULTANT shall prepare and maintain a project schedule throughout the life of the project. The schedule will be used as a tool to manage the project and updated as the specific milestones are achieved. • CONSULTANT will coordinate regular project update calls and meetings to review project status and schedule milestone updates.
• Monthly progress reports.
• Meeting notes.

Task 1 Deliverables:
• Kick-off meeting (agenda, goals, agreements, and schedules) and meeting notes • Project update calls
• Monthly progress reports

Task 2 Public Outreach & Data Gathering

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN
As the City of Hanford considers making improvements to its active transportation infrastructure, it is critical to involve citizens and stakeholders in the process. In order to encourage strong participation from the large Hispanic community, each public meeting / event must p rovide Spanish language accommodates and all outreach materials must be provided in English and Spanish. Early and sustained involvement helps make a successful project, but drawn out schedules can sap the interest of all but most the serious advocates. In our experience, successful engagement requires:
• Tangible projects, project concepts, and well-defined questions that can elicit meaningful input • Defined, fun exercises that engage the public about project benefits and trade-offs • Limited timeframes for participation
• Multiple methods of interaction so participants can stay for as much or little time as they like • Online engagement to reach a broader audience

CONSULTANT will develop a detailed Public Engagement Plan (PEP) that describes proposed events and identifies the schedule and key considerations for each event. This document will describe (1) the goals of the engagement effort, (2) the key audiences to reach within the City, and (3) the strategies (meetings, advertising, and other efforts), to reach these audiences. CONSULTANT will continue to update the engagement strategy as the planning process continues, updating lists of stakeholders and other participants as well as identifying additional activities as needed to support the Plan. All public input will be captured an d summarized in a chapter of the Plan.

CONSULTANT will be able to provide access to digital video conferencing software that can accommodate simultaneous participants for webinars or interactive meetings, which can include polling, virtual “breakout sessions”, screen sharing, and live- chats. CONSULTANT will monitor updates on the COVID-19 restrictions and work with the City of Hanford to make any changes to the Public Engagement Plan, as appropriate.

EQUITY FRAMEWORK
CONSULTANT will develop an Equity Framework as part of the PEP which will ensure that all citizens of Hanford have the opportunity to engage meaningfully in the ATP process. The Equity Framework would be used by the City, project stakeholders, and other community-based organizations that are involved in the planning process to focus on what role active transportation facilities and programs can help, if at all, to address disparities. The Framework will help ensure that groups who frequently face greater transportation disparities and vulnerabilities (ex. people of color, women, people of no -and low-income, people with limited English proficiency, people with disabil ities, children and seniors, single parents, and people who don’t own cars or do

Page 11 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 3
not drive) are fully considered in the evaluation of existing conditions and in recommendations. This Framework will guide the identification of community outreach events and ensure that engagement with disparate or vulnerable groups is prioritized.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
CONSULTANT will develop, through active promotion and advertising, an ATP Technical Advisory Committee (ATP-TAC) comprised of various stak eholders and interested citizens willing to volunteer their time to provide input and oversight throughout the duration of the project. This team would serve in a volunteer capacity and meet regularly to review project updates, provide feedback, and assist the project team in meeting project goals. In order to ensure representation from a broad array of the community, the desired make-up of the ATP-TAC will include representatives from the following groups:
• Youth
• Seniors
• People with Disabilities
• Limited English Proficiency
• Low-Income populations
The ATP-TAC shall meet at least quarterly throughout the duration of the project and may meet more frequently, as needed.

CONSULTANT will work with City staff to develop a list of potential stakeholders with an interest in pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the region. These stakeholders shall include, but are not limited to City staff, police services, school district’s st aff, representatives from service organizations, the Tulare/Kings Hispanic Chamber of Com merce, the local branch of the American Legion (Post 3), Self -Help Housing (benefits low -income families with limited English proficiency), disabled residents, senior citizens, businesses, neighborhood leaders, residents, local bicycle and running clubs, the Tachi Yokut Tribe, King Area Rural Transit (KART), and other interested groups. CONSULTANT will work with City staff to develop a final list of stakeholders and contact specific groups.

CONSULTANT will facilitate up to three (3) ATP -TAC meetings. These meetings may be held concurrently with other public engagement efforts. CONSULTANT will lead all logistical considerations and coordination with stakeholders. CONSULTANT will prepare meeting agendas and will document attendance and input received. The proposed meetings will include:
• Meeting 1 – Listening Session: One meeting at the onset of the project to understand local and regional issues related to bicycling and walking and help set the stage for the development of the project. • Meeting 2 – Collaboration Session: One meeting to present the summary of existing conditions and gather feedback on early findings. This meeting shall take place prior to the first community workshop. Feedback will be used in the development of materials for the first public workshop. • Meeting 3 – Presentation Session: One meeting to present the final infrastructure, policy and programmatic recommendations. This meeting shall take place prior to presenting recommendations at the second community workshop. Feedback from this meeting will be incorporated to the final recommendations to be presented at the second and last community workshop.

CONSULTANT will begin specifically promoting opportunities for citizen involvement using general promotion efforts as soon as possible. These efforts shall include, but are not limited to, public notices as follows:
• A total of ten (10), full -color flyers (8.5” x 11 ”) provided to the City for posting on the interior of the KART buses and local establishments
• A public notice provided to the Hanford City Clerk for posting at City Hall • A public notice advertised in the Hanford News, with an additional public notice posted two weeks later • A public notice posted to the project website which can be used throughout the duration of the project

Page 12 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 4

POP-UP EVENTS
CONSULTANT shall develop materials and coordinate with the City and ATP -TAC members to conduct up to eight (8) pop-up events during the duration of the project. CONSULTANT will be required to attend a total of four pop-up events with the remaining four to be conducted by City staff or ATP-TAC members. The CONSULTANT will work with the City to publicize the mobile workshops to ensure all members of the public know about the workshop and have the opportunity to attend. CONSULTANT will develop materials, maps, methods to gather input, and summary notes each event. CONSULTANT will provide materials in English and Spanish.

CONSULTANT will work with the City of Hanford to propose a substitution for any activities including pop -up engagement opportunities that may not be possible due to COVID19 related restrictions.

PROJECT WEBSITE AND ONLINE ENGAGEMENT
CONSULTANT will create a project website (in both English and Spanish) which will include a brief summary of the project, a description of the project milestones, a list of key dates, copies of documents cleared for public access that are available for download, contact information for the CONSULTANT point person, and any other materials or resources that may be beneficial to the public. CONSULTANT will regularly post project updates throughout the duration of the project.

CONSULTANT will also provide brief updates (1-2 sentences) to the City on a regular basis for the City to post to City social media (Facebook and Twitter) accounts and on the project website.

CONSULTANT will manage a survey, to be made available in English and Spanish and for both paper and online access, for gathering input on community needs/priorities and challenges in the existing pedestrian and bicycle network. Results from the survey will help inform recommendations to the active transportation network.

CONSULTANT will provide the City with an online interactive community map in order to increase the opportunities for the public to provide meaningful input and feedback. CONSULTANT will utilize online mapping for two project phases:
• Phase 1 Needs: The online map will be available for open -ended comments, feedback, and input from the public.

Members of the community may identify priority destinations for walking and biking, routes they would like to see improved, and similar information. The map will allow users to comment on input from other users, allowin g for a dialogue among residents. This phase would be online through Task 3. • Phase 2 Recommendations: The online map will show the draft recommended bicycle, pedestrian, and trail networks developed by CONSULTANT as a result of community input and independ ent analysis. Members of the public may comment on the recommendations to indicate their approval or disapproval of the network.

PUBLIC OUTREACH SIGNAGE
CONSULTANT will develop one unique poster / yard sign which include a QR code and link to the project website for each outreach phase of the project and print 10 copies (for a total of 20). These promotional materials will help drive locals to the online survey and interactive mapping exercises. The CONSULTANT will work with City staff to place promotional materials at locations that are highly trafficked by pedestrians and bicyclists in the City of Hanford such as the intersection of W 7th Street and Douty Street, the KART transit center, Centennial Park, Freedom Park, the Hanford Sports Complex, and the Civic Center Park.

COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS
CONSULTANT will facilitate four (4) in-person community workshops during the course of the project to highlight the Plan, focused on providing the public with tangible products that require public engagement. There will be two workshops conducted during each outreach phase as described below. CONSULTANT will develop flyers, draft agenda, pr esentation materials, maps, methods to gather input, and summary notes for the workshop. CONSULTANT will also provide materials in English and Spanish, and will make sure Spanish -speaking staff attend the workshops. The City of Hanford will secure the meet ing location and distribute noticing. Beginning thirty (30) days prior to each scheduled workshop, CONSULTANT will engage in multiple methods of outreach to promote the community workshop. CONSULTANT will engage in a concerted public outreach effort using flyers,

Page 13 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 5
public notices, outreach signage, the project website, and social media to advertise the event and encourage participation.

Workshops will be developed around the following project phases:
• Phase 1 - Needs Workshops (Workshops 1 & 2) – The first and second workshops will present the existing network and programs, gather feedback on network gaps and areas of concern, and review data on safety concerns, connectivity, and other factors.
• Phase 2 – Recommendations Workshops (Workshops 3 & 4) – The third and fourth community workshops will be used to review the draft policy and infrastructure recommendations, and solicit feedback from the community.

CONSULTANT will demonstrate availability and familiarity with a secondary fully virtual option to Com munity Workshops as a contingency option for COVID related restrictions.

COMMUNITY WALKING AUDIT
The CONSULTANT will work with the City and ATP -TAC to conduct one walking / bicycling audit within the City and invite community members and the ATP-TAC to participate. The goal of the audit will be to highlight barriers and concerns of residents and to assess existing conditions related to active transportation. The CONSULTANT will oversee coordination and promotion of the audit while managing audit logistics such as scheduling with community partners, route planning, developing of printed materials like route maps or checklists, and providing a summary of findings.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY
At the conclusion of the public involvement portion of the project, CONSULTANT will provide a summary of public engagement with special emphasis on accomplishments with key stakeholders including the s chool district and underserved portions of the community.

Task 2 Deliverables:
• Final Public Engagement Plan describing goals of the outreach and proposed events • A total of ten (10), full -color flyers (8.5” x 11 ”) provided to the City for posting on the in terior of the Start buses and local bicycle establishments
• A total of twenty (20) yard sign / poster sized promotional signs for posting at highly visible and highly trafficked pedestrian areas
• A public notice provided to the Hanford City Clerk for posting at City Hall • A public notice advertised in the Hanford News, with an additional public notice posted two weeks later • A public notice posted to an CONSULTANT-created project website which can be used throughout the duration of the project
• Up to three (3) Technical Advisory Team meetings and meeting materials • Two (2) community workshops and public notice of workshops (materials in English and Spanish with bilingual interpretation available)
• Project website with monthly updates
• Nine (9) social media posts for City to distribute
• Interactive online survey and map (English and Spanish) • Up to four (2) pop-up events (materials in English and Spanish with bilingual interpretation available) • Public engagement summary
Task 3 Community Needs Assessment-User Analysis
Through this task, the CONSULTANT will focus on understanding where the biggest needs and the biggest opportunities may be for providing more comfortable and connected bicycle and pedestrian networks. More specifically, CONSULTANT staff will focus on the following sub tasks:

Page 14 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 6

PLAN REVIEW
CONSULTANT will review relevant plans, policies, and reports that pertain to active transportation in the City to allow for consistency. At the onset of the project, CONSULTANT will work with the City to finalize a list of p lans/ documents / policies to be reviewed. CONSULTANT will submit a data request memo to City staff, to request all available plans, policies, and regulations which may have any effect on the development of the plan and recommendations. Following the revie w of the documents, CONSULTANT staff will develop a summary of plans and how they pertain to the development and implementation of bicycle and pedestrian recommendations in the Plan. The CONSULTANT will consider the potential for displacement of existing c ommunity members resulting from recommended projects and provide

VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES
Based on review of existing plans and input from City staff, CONSULTANT will develop a vision statement for the draft plan. The vision will be a broad and inspirational statement that presents the desired impact on pedestrian and bicycle travel in the future.

Goals, policies, and action statements will be developed to support the vision statement. CONSULTANT will develop a memo that will be the foundation of this section of the plan. CONSULTANT will revise the memo based on one set of internally consistent client comments and include final changes in the Draft Active Transportation Plan.

EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BASE MAPS
CONSULTANT will work with the City to compile and organize available information on existing conditions for the project area such as demographics, traffic volumes, state route planning and construction plans, aerial and base maps, and existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities. CONSULTANT will then prepare a series of base maps for design and analysis work that can be easily understood by the public for use at meetings and the public events. Data will also be collected using available data and verified with desktop review and strategic field visits. CONSULTANT will share the final map (with all GIS shape files) with the City.

GAP ANALYSIS
CONSULTANT will conduct a detailed assessment of gaps and needs of on- and off-street bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities.

This assessment will quantify factors that impact walking and bicycling activity, locate network gaps as potential projects, and identify key pedestrian and bicycling areas based on demand and supply variables. Analysis under this task shall include:
• Demand Analysis (Land Use Analysis). CONSULTANT will use data about existing and proposed land use, trips, and others to identify where there is high demand for biking and walking in Hanford. This will consider access to transit, schools, work, commercial destinations, trail heads, and others. CONSULTANT will coordinate with City Planning Department to consider future land uses surrounding the Kings/Tulare HSR Station and their impacts on future bikin g and walking demand. CONSULTANT will provide memo summarizing results of up to four analyzed land use scenarios. • Safety Analysis (Collision Analysis): CONSULTANT will conduct an analysis of safety issues in Hanford. CONSULTANT will use the latest five ye ars of vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian collisions using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) to develop maps that illustrate bicycle and pedestrian collision locations based on severity . High injury corridors and intersections will be identified for special consideration in the recommendations section of the plan update. CONSULTANT will work with the city to perform high level audits to identify safety concerns at high-collision locations. • Modeshare Analysis: CONSULTANT will work with the City to understand the estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips, and the estimated increase in the numb er of bicycle trips and pedestrian trips resulting from implementation of the plan. CONSULTANT will use data about existing multimodal infrastructure to develop an understanding of how well destinations and areas of demand are connected for people who want to walk and bike for both transportation and recreation. It will also consider how Hanford’s bicycle, pedestrian, and trail networks connect to the City’s neighbors. • Equity Analysis: CONSULTANT will map demographic information city-wide to understand specific conditions related to low income, minority households, and households without access to a motor vehicle in the study area. This information can be used to identify programmatic strategies to support students, families, and schools with limited capacit y and resources, and in the project prioritization phase to focus resources in areas that have been traditionally less well - served by city infrastructure. As part of this analysis, the CONSULTANT will consider the potential for displacement

Page 15 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 7
caused by recom mended projects due to cost -of-living increases and provide policy considerations for the City to proactively address potential issues. This will include a review of industry best practices on displacement mitigation from across the United States.
• Level of Traffic Stress Analysis: CONSULTANT will assess the Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) on the existing bikeway facilities using available data including number of vehicle travel lanes, existing bicycle facilities, and intersection controls. Gaps in the network will be identified in terms of user comfort, identifying where a segment drops below the desired level of traffic stress and implications for ridership. This task will look at:
o Accessibility of regional destinations
o Potential new facility requirements (in excess of existing and planned facilities) o Existing barriers to bicycle access

CONSULTANT will use these analyses to identify:
• New trail opportunities along creeks/water features, other infrastructure right -of-ways, or adjacent to public street right-of-ways;
• Gaps in existing bicycle networks, intersection crossing needs, and other conflict points, • Gaps in pedestrian networks, such as sidewalk gaps, crossing needs in areas of pedestrian activities or at crossings of streets and other public right-of-ways;
• Priorities in route choice and how specific project improvements improve overall bicycle mobility based on specific user groups and their preferences;
• Potential enhancements to existing trails and bicycle and pedestrian facilities to meet design and/or Amer icans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, and
• Needs for supporting bicycle facilities, such as bicycle parking, repair stations and other CONSULTANT will produce a series of maps, tables, and narrative that describe gaps and needs, developing a chapter for the plan that synthesize this information into critical needs and gaps that can be addressed by the City. CONSULTANT will also produce a map specifically identifying opportunities for and barriers to walking and bicycling around schools in the Hanford Elementary School District.

CONSULTANT will develop an Existing Conditions Memo that includes deliverables from Task 3.

Task 3 Deliverables:
• Map identifying opportunities and barriers around schools in the HESD • Vision, goals, and objectives
• Base map files (GIS format and with all shape files)
• Existing Conditions Memo
Task 4 Non-Infrastructure and Programs

POLICIES AND PROGRAMS REVIEW
CONSULTANT team will catalog any additional policies and programs that the City and non -profit partners conduct to promot e pedestrian and bicycle safety. CONSULTANT will categorize programs into the following program areas:
• Education
• Encouragement
• Enforcement
• Evaluation

Page 16 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 8

NON-INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
CONSULTANT will develop specific program recommendations in coordinatio n with implementing agencies. CONSULTANT will develop a pedestrian and bicycle programs memo that will be the foundation of the update to the plan for this section.

CONSULTANT will revise the memo based on one set of internally consistent client comments.

Task 4 Deliverables:
• Summary of existing policies and programs
• Pedestrian and bicycle programs memo
Task 5 Development and Implementation of the ATP
This task will provide Hanford with a list of projects, a method to prioritize projects, and identification of funding sources to support future projects. The outcome will be a plan with prioritized locations and specific improvements for streets, sidewalks, and intersections that support all users.

DESIGN GUIDELINES
CONSULTANT will develop design guidelines to reflect changes in best practices and in coordination with the City’s policies.

CONSULTANT will consult the FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks Guide (STAR) as well as Caltrans Highway Design Manuals and Design Information Bulletins, and 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. The design guidelines will be a stand- alone document. CONSULTANT will develop and revise the design guidelines based on one set of internally c onsistent client comments. Design guidelines will include the following:
• Bikeway, trail, and sidewalk recommended widths
• Bikeway and trail intersection guidance
• Bicycle detection recommendations
• Striping and signing recommendations
• Bicycle parking recommendations by land use type
• Pedestrian improvement standards, accessibility issues, and crosswalk Prioritization Policy • Traffic calming and control devices for universal access CONSULTANT will develop a set of design guidelines tailored to the unique context of the City of Hanford, using images and information on local infrastructure that provides the City with a resource to implement ongoing bicycle and pedestrian design solutions as part of project opportunities that arise from other projects such as new development or regular street resurfacing.

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN NETWORK RECOMMENDATIONS
CONSULTANT will develop pedestrian and bicycle network recommendations. The networks will be developed with a variety of users in mind (school children, commuters, elderly and disabled adults, and recreational users), and enhance local non-motorized connections. The CONSULTANT team will prepare maps depicting existing, funded, and proposed bicycle and pedestrian projects.

We will also produce a project list. Each listed project will include the project name, proposed facility type, segment endpo ints and segment length. Recommendations will be categorized by facility type and may include:
• Local and regional bikeways (e.g., Class I/II/III/IV facilities) • Pedestrian spot improvements (e.g., sidewalk infill, crossing enhancements) • Support facilities (e.g., short- and long-term bike parking and trailheads) • Future studies (e.g., trail feasibility studies, bike share feasibility studies, signal timing enhancements, and other improvements requiring further analysis)

ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATES
Based on the draft network recommendations, CONSULTANT will develop planning-level order of magnitude cost ranges for the bicycle and pedestrian network improvements. Order of magnitude cost estimates will include a range of cost to provide decision

Page 17 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 9
makers and the public with an indication of the potential order of magnitude of costs when considering recommendations. Orders of magnitude will be based on the latest unit costs used in Hanford and nearby communities.

PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
CONSULTANT will develop a Project Prioritization matrix that will allow the city to rank the proposed projects. CONSULTANT will develop an initial set of evaluation criteria to be reviewed by the City and ATP-TAC. The evaluation criteria will be used to measure the relative importance of each recommended bicycle and pedestrian improvement. Project evaluation criteria may include:
• Public Support
• Safety
• Connectivity
• Transit Support
• Quality
• Feasibility
The City and the ATP -TAC will provide the final criteria and evaluation method for the CONSULTANT to apply to the proposed projects. As part of this task and using the cost ranges developed during Task 5, CONSULTANT will also identify projects that will require additional review and studies (ex. feasibility, traffic study, ROW needs, etc.). This will help the City identify both priorities and appropriate methods for implementation, including relevant funding sources. The implementation strategy will include general development guidelines for condit ioning future development to implement projects identified in this Plan as the opportunity arises.

FUNDING ANALYSIS AND NEEDS
As part of this task, CONSULTANT will provide an implementation strategy that identifies potential funding opportunities – including local, regional, and statewide funding – and applies them to each project. CONSULTANT will compile existing conditions data to help meet the grant applicat ion requirements of various federal and state grant programs regularly used to fund non - motorized improvement projects, as identified in the funding portion of the AT Plan, to include, but not limited to, the High way Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Acti ve Transportation Program (ATP), and Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant program.

CONSULTANT will create a funding opportunity matrix to match project recommendations with eligible funding sources.

Task 5 Deliverables:
• Citywide design guidelines for the development of active transportation facilities • Proposed bicycle and pedestrian network improvements
• Planning level cost estimates for proposed active transportation improvements • Prioritized project list, including maps and tables that capture the top feasible priorities for the City • Project recommendations and implementation memo

Task 6 Project Concept Plans
CONSULTANT will develop concept plans of the top three (3) priority projects derived from the funding and needs analysis. These will be suitable for the City to apply for grant funding for implementation and include the following signing, striping and other improvements that can be used to develop preliminary planning-level cost estimates and inform a future detailed design phase.

Any changes to the cu rb/gutter and sidewalks or other work changing the vertical alignment of the area will not include consideration of drainage improvements. New curb or upgraded curb ramp locations will be noted in the concept plans and included cost estimates, but not desi gned. The CONSULTANT will develop one administrative draft per concept for the City to review and provide one round of comments.

CONSULTANT will revise each concept plan based on one set of internally consistent client comments.

Page 18 of 474 ends

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 10
Task 6 Deliverables:
• Concept plans for three (3) priority projects

Task 7 Draft and Final Plan

PREPARE ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT PLAN
CONSULTANT will prepare and circulate an administrative draft plan for review by City staff and members of the advisory group.

The Plan will be comprised of content drafted and approved in the working memos from previous tasks, including conceptual designs, recommendations and standards for improved road safety and operations, pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities, and enhanced streetscapes. It will identify a network of routes that can be retrofitted in stages over time as part of the City c apital improvement program, or as grants, and other funding sources are attained. The document will also contain a record of the outreach process, proposed timing, and prioritization for implementation of the recommendations, and potential funding sources and strategies. City staff will compile and organize comments for response and provide direction for the first round of revisions.

PREPARE PUBLIC REVIEW OF DRAFT PLAN
CONSULTANT will revise the administrative draft based on one set of internally consistent City comments and produce the public draft of the Hanford Active Transportation Plan. The DRAFT plan will be posted on the project website for public comment for a period of one (1) month.

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION
CONSULTANT will revise the public draft based on public fe edback on the DRAFT plan and guidance from City staff and prepare the final draft of the Hanford Active Transportation Plan. CONSULTANT will present the final draft to the Hanford City Council for approval and adoption.

FINAL DRAFT AND PLAN SUBMISSION
CONSULTANT will finalize the document and transmit electronic source files. CONSULTANT will print and ship up to three (3) hard copies of the final plan to the City, and will deliver one (1) electronic copy to the City.

Task 7 Deliverables:
• Administrative draft plan
• Public draft plan
• Presentation of the final draft to City Council for approval and adoption • Final draft (including electronic source files and one electronic copy) • Print and ship up to three (3) hardcopies of the final draft

Page 19 of 474 ends

14.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/19/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the Minutes of the August 1, 2023 Meeting

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the minutes from the August 1, 2023 meeting.

BACKGROUND:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. August 1, 2023

Page 20 of 474 ends

City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes
August 1, 2023 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the study session and closed session to order at 4:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Kalish Morrow

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Dennis Ham commented on the selection process for the Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning Commission. City Attorney Ty Mizote responded to his comments.

Bob Ramos spoke in favor of allowing public comment for three minutes.

Nick Wagner questioned the study session start time and expressed his concerns regarding comments made by Vice Mayor Kairis.

Mark Pratter expressed his concerns about the Council's discussion about the public comment period.

Jim Nelson commented on the selection process for the Chair and Vice Chair for the city's commissions.

Rusty Brookshire commented on the public comment period time limit.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Presentation regarding the Annual Fire inspection process and an overview of the Program including the types, frequency, and costs of the inspections.

Page 21 of 474 ends

Fire Chief Pendergrass provided an overview of the fire inspection process including the types, frequency, and cost. Chief Pendergrass took the Council through the West Wing of the Civic Auditorium for a walkthrough fire inspection. Staff answered questions from the Council. No action was taken. The presentation was for informational purposes only.

B. Review of the Handbook of Rules and Procedures for the Hanford City Council and discussion of potential amendments
City Manager Cifuentez provided an overview of the City Council's Rules and Procedures Handbook, covering the major sections. He also discussed the process of amendments. The Council discussed special sessions, the brown act, and the public comment section. The Council provided their feedback. The City Manager will bring back the Handbook with staff recommendations for the Council's review and consideration at a future meeting.

CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS (GC 54956.8):

1. Property: 113 Court St. (Court House) APN: 010-265-001-000 Agency Negotiators: Mario Cifuentez and Ty Mizote
Negotiating Party: Kevin Nickell and Jason Carvalho

2. Property: 113 Court St. (Bastille) APN: 010-265-001-000 Agency Negotiators: Mario Cifuentez and Ty Mizote
Negotiating Party: Julie Green and Steven Green
CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Kalish Morrow

INVOCATION:

The invocation was led by Pastor Bobby Guerra.

FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Vice Mayor Kairis.

CLOSED SESSION ACTION REPORT:

None.

COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council

Page 22 of 474 ends

related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

The Council discussed the meetings and events they attended. The Council also addressed the homeless camp located at Hume Ave. and Shepard Dr.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Liz Wagner spoke in opposition to the proposed location of the homeless shelter.

Steven Denton, has been working with Vice Mayor Kairis regarding the stray cats in his neighborhood and he is seeking additional assistance from the Council.

Nick Wagner commented on the proposed location of the homeless shelter. He expressed his concerns regarding the increase in homeless people by having a homeless shelter in the city.

Bob Ramos expressed his concerns about pedestrian safety in the area of the proposed location of the homeless shelter.

Mark Pratter commented on the 18 aces across from Hidden Valley Park.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Mayor Paden pulled item C. Motion to approve the consent calendar except for the items pulled for separate discussion.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Mark Kairis
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp A. Procedural Waiver: Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title the only.

B. Public Works: Approval of FY 23/24 blanket purchase orders (BPOs) over $50,000 for various divisions in the Public Works Department. The total amount of these BPOs for FY 23/24 is $5,520,900.

C. Finance: Adoption of Resolution 23-29-R to update the authorization of investment of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund.

D. Finance: Acceptance and authorization for staff to File the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Reports as of 06/30/2023.

PULLED CONSENT ITEMS:

A. Public Works: Approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for Tract No. 934 with Lennar Homes of California, LLC, and adopt the attached Resolution 23-27-R

Page 23 of 474 ends

Establishing the Formation of Assessment District No. 20-02; and adopt the attached Resolution 23-31-R Intention to Levy Assessment and Confirmation of Engineer's Report; and adopt the attached Resolution 23-30-R Initiating Proceedings for the Formation of Assessment District No. 20-02.
[Item C]

Pulled by Mayor Paden.

Mayor Paden recused himself from the discussion and the vote.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSTAIN:

Passed
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Kalish Morrow, Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Lou Martinez
Travis Paden

PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Parks and Community Services: Public Hearing to Adopt Resolution 23-28-R, approving the collection of Landscape Assessment District assessments as outlined, pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and approving the assessment increases as proposed.

Mayor Paden opened up the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. The Parks and Community Services Director Brad Albert, presented the staff report and invited questions from the Council. Mayor Paden questioned the district's property taxes.

Vice Mayor Kairis commented on the district areas. Staff and City Attorney Mizote responded to questions from the Council. The Council provided their feedback regarding outreach and educating the homeowners in the districts.

Public Comment:

IN-FAVOR:

None.

OPPOSSED:

None.

Mayor Paden closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Police: Adoption of Resolution No. 23-32-R, authorizing the acceptance of a grant from California Highway Patrol in the amount of $63,033.28, Amendment to the Police Department operating budget to recognize the grant, Appropriation of the same amount in the General Fund for the Police Department, and Authorization for the Police Chief to execute the grant agreement.

Police Chief Sever discussed the grant for the Council's review and approval. Chief Sever answered questions from the Council.

Page 24 of 474 ends

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:
(UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Mark Kairis
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp B. Parks and Community Services: Approval of a contract with Park Planet, totaling $174,586.80, for the purchase of replacement playground equipment and installation services at Earl F Johnson Park, to be funded by the Accumulated Capital Outlay (ACO) Fund.

Parks and Community Services Director Brad Albert discussed the contract and the vendor selection process. He also recommended relocating the playground equipment. The Council discussed the high school students in the area. Council Members Sharp and Morrow spoke in support of relocating the equipment and expressed some concerns regarding the budget.

Motion to approve the contract with the amendment to relocate the playground to site number two, in an amount not to exceed 252,000.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:
(UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Diane Sharp
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS::

A. Council Future Agenda Items
B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

Every Saturday: Free Fitness Court Classes at Hidden Valley Park 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

August 12: Helping Hands Volunteer Program at Hidden Valley Park 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon
August 15: Regular City Council Meeting
August 19: Walk with a Doc at Hanford Mall (food court entrance) 9:00 a.m.-10:00 a.m.

More info
September 4: City offices will be closed in observance of Labor Day September 5: Cancelled City Council meeting
ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Paden adjourned the meeting at 8:29 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Natalie Corral
City Clerk

Page 25 of 474 ends

14.C.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/19/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the Minutes of the August 15, 2023 Meeting

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the minutes for the August 15, 2023 meeting.

BACKGROUND:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. August 15, 2023

Page 26 of 474 ends

City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes
August 15, 2023 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the study session and closed session to order at 4:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Mark Kairis

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Bob Ramos commented on the mural approval process. He also commented on basketball hoops, and spoke in opposition to creating a permitting process.

Judy Scott agreed with Council Member Morrow's comments regarding the mural approval process.

Jennifer Butts, a local muralist, commented on the mural approval process and shared her experience in other cities.

She also answered questions from Council Member Morrow.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Community Development: Presentation regarding potential changes to the City's mural approval process that would either limit content-based restrictions on murals or effectively prohibit murals within the city
Deputy City Manager Jason Waters discussed the potential changes to the city's mural approval process for the Council's review and direction. The Council discussed the presented options and provided their feedback. Dep. Waters and City Attorney Mizote answered questions from the Council. Council Member Morrow spoke in favor of streamlining the process. After much discussion, the Council directed staff to bring back a mural policy for the Council's review and approval.

Page 27 of 474 ends

B. Community Development: Presentation regarding the required permitting and ordinance changes needed to allow basketball hoops in the City's right-of-way Deputy City Manager Jason Waters discussed the possible permitting process for allowing basketball hoops in the city's right of way. Dep. Waters also discussed the California Attorney General's suggestion on how to protect the public. The Council discussed staff time, the code enforcement process, the current policy, and the challenges of implementing a permitting process. Staff answered questions from the Council. It was a Council consensus to not take any action at this time.

Mayor Paden adjourned the study session at 5:20 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATION (GC 54956.8) APN: 014-230-030
Negotiation Party:Thomas G. Loogman, Robert A. Loogman, Colette M. Quinn, John M.

Loogman, Jr., Lisa M. Askins, and Trudy N. Simas
Agency Negotiators: Mario Cifuentez, Ty Mizote, and Brad Albert B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATION (GC 54956.8) APNs: 028-240-018, 028-240-020, 028-310-008, 028-310-025, 028-310-005, 028-310-007, 028-240-008, 028-240-016, 028-240-021, and 028-240-019
Negotiating Party: Philip Verwey
Agency Negotiators: Mario Cifuentez and Ty Mizote
CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Mark Kairis

INVOCATION:

The invocation was led by Ralph Hurtado.

FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Council Member Sharp.

CLOSED SESSION ACTION REPORT:

None.

COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

The Council members discussed the meetings and events that they attended.

Page 28 of 474 ends

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Geni Lefler commented on the code violation notice she received from the city.

Eliazbeth Garzarick commented on the city's youth camps programs.

Mike Mendoza commented on his past complaint regarding his tenants' water bill and the lien notice he received. He also questioned the policy for delinquent bills.

Larry Faria spoke in support of the request for approval to add two new police officers.

Victor Chavarin Jr., representative for Senator Hurtardo's office, introduced himself to the Council.

Jaime Barrella commented on animal control's schedule. He stated that the city needs animal control to be available on weekends.

Noor Memon commented on the letters he sent to the Council and the City Manager and he requested a response.

Bob Ramos commented on the basin in the city that remains dry. He stated, "it needs to be checked". He also asked why the Civic Park restrooms were closed during the Main Street event.

Susan Davis, an employee at the Star restaurant, commented on an incident at the restaurant. She also provided pictures of the homeless issue in the alley. She also commented on the homeless issue in the downtown area.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Items E, F, and H were pulled by the Council. Motion to approve the consent calendar except for the items pulled for separate discussion.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp A. Procedural Waiver: Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title the only.

B. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the July 18, 2023 Meeting C. City Attorney: Approval of the Lease with Latis, LLC for the property known as the Future Heroes Park Land and Authorization for the Mayor to execute the Lease Agreement.

D. City Attorney: Approval of an Agricultural Ground Lease with Phillip Verwey Farms for the 1,600 acres of land owned by the City's Wastewater Fund for an annual amount of $161,600, with an annual credit of $69,000 for the development of two (2) wells on the site by the Lessee.

E. Public Works: Approval of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison for the

Page 29 of 474 ends

purpose of installing utilities to a telecommunications site and Authorization for the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said deeds with the Kings County Recorder's Office; and Approval of an Access and Utility Agreement with T- Mobile West LLC, a Delaware limited liability company for the right to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and replace utility infrastructure within the easement.

F. Police: Approval of an amended contract between the City of Hanford and Kings County Office of Education School Resourse Officer services, for an annual contract amount to $98,000 for one officer.

PULLED CONSENT ITEMS:

A. Community Development: Adoption of Resolution 23-34-R, Supporting the submittal of an application for up to $3,000,000 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) State's 2023 Manufactured Housing Opportunity and Revitalization Program (MORE) program, for the Rehabilitation or Replacement of Resident's Mobile homes within Hanford city limits.
[Item E]

Pulled by Council Member Martinez.

Housing Analyst Sandra Lerma-Martinez answered questions from Council Members Martinez and Morrow.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Mark Kairis
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp B. Parks and Community Services: Approval of a three-year agreement with Magic Ice, Inc. (Miami, FL) for the rental of a 60' x 100' natural ice skating rink for the Winter Wonderland Event for a total contract price of $552,917 [Item F]

Pulled by Council Member Martinez.

Parks and Community Services Director Brad Albert answered questions from the Council.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Lou Martinez
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp C. Police: Approval of an amended contract between the City of Hanford and the Hanford Joint Union High School School District, in the amount of $98,000 for each of the four School Resource officers, for a total contract amount of $392,000 annually. [Item H]

Pulled by Mayor Paden.

Mayor Paden expressed his concerns regarding the overtime expenditures for school events. Chief Sever clarified. The Mayor would like the contracts to be more specific. Vice Mayor Kairis expressed his concerns regarding the contract

Page 30 of 474 ends

verbiage and would like at least to see an addendum to cover that area. Council Member Sharp motioned to approve as presented and instruct staff to approach the district and see if they would be amenable to drilling down and see how they can cover these overtime events. After a brief discussion regarding her motion, Council Member Sharp clarified her motion.

Motion to a approve as written and instruct staff to visit the District about this issue and report back to Council with possible addendum.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

NAYS:

Passed
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Diane Sharp
Mark Kairis
GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Police: Authorization to add two (2) new Police Officer positions and one (1) new patrol vehicle from existing and 2023/2024 funding from the Citizens Options' for Public Safety (COPS) Fund and Appropriation of $317,800 in the fiscal year 2023/2024 budget to cover the expenses.

Chief Sever presented to the staff a report for the Council's review and consideration. Staff answered questions from the Council.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Lou Martinez
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp B. Community Development: Approval of the purchase of four (4) 2023 Ford E-Transit-350 Cargo Vans from Future Ford of Clovis (Clovis, CA) for a total price of $266,821.52, to be partially funded by $80,000 in grant funding from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) and adoption of Resolution No. 23-35-R to authorize the City Manager as administrator for the Alternative Fuel New Vehicle Program Grant.

Deputy City Manager Jason Waters discussed the transition to a Mobile Workspace vehicle for building inspectors. Staff answered questions from the Council.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Mark Kairis
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis, Diane Sharp COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS:

A. Council Future Agenda Items
Council Member Sharp addressed some concerns expressed by the public regarding the homeless situation. Mayor Paden addressed Mr. Mendoza's public comment and question the language in the utility policy regarding delinquency.

City Attorney Mizote responded to the Mayor's comments and questions. The Council advised Mr. Mendoza to contact

Page 31 of 474 ends

the Utility Department regarding his situation.

The Council directed staff to provide a budget update at a future meeting, brought forth by Vice Mayor Kairis.

B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

Every Saturday: Free Fitness Court Classes at Hidden Valley Park 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.

August 19: Walk with a Doc at the Hanford Mall (food court entrance) 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.

September 4: City offices will be closed in observance of Labor Day September 5: Cancelled City Council Meeting
September 19: Regular City Council Meeting
September 20-22: Annual Conference and Expo in Sacramento ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Paden adjourned the meeting at 8:16 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Natalie Corral
City Clerk

Page 32 of 474 ends

14.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/19/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of a 5-year contract with Brandley Engineering, of Loomis, California, to provide Airport Engineering, Planning and Construction Management Services for State and Federally funded Airport Improvement Projects.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve the award of a 5-year contract with Brandley Engineering, of Loomis, California, to provide Airport Engineering, Planning and Construction Management Services for State and Federally funded Airport Improvement Projects.

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), a Request for Qualifications was issued in order to seek Statements of Qualifications from any and all firms interested in providing consulting, engineering, planning and construction management services for the next five (5) years. The FAA encourages sponsors (the City accepting the grant) to keep a firm under contract, as opposed to a project by project basis, because the federal funding process for Airport Improvement Projects is typically a 2 year process which includes the project submission for initial consideration, filling of an application and a tentative allocation issued by the FAA. This contract secures the services of the firm and then individual Supplmental Services Agreements will be approved by Council in the future and then executed for each project, which will include the FAA- approved fees for their work on that project.

The RFQ process began earlier this year. Once the RFQ was issued, a consultant selection committee was established that reviewed three (3) proposals that were received in response to the Request for Statement of Qualifications for a multi-year contract for engineering design services for the Hanford Airport. The three (3) firms that responded to the RFQ were:
• Mead & Hunt, Santa Rosa, CA
• Tartaglia Engineering, Atascadero, CA
• Brandley Engineering, Loomis, CA

All of the three (3) firms were invited for an interview, based on a review and evaluation of their written Statements of Qualifications. Mead & Hunt chose to withdraw from the process prior to the interviews. The firms were rated on the merit of their proposals, their knowledge and expertise in both airport projects and AIP funded grant programs. Additionally, they were rated on the record of past performance with other airports as well as any knowledge of local conditions that were exhibited in the proposals and interviews.

Page 33 of 474 ends

Interviews were conducted by a panel including the City Manager, Deputy City Manager and the Airport Manager. The panel ranked the firms based on experience with FAA funded projects and expertise in designing and overseeing the types of projects included in the attached Hanford Airport’s federal Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP). Brandley Engineering ranked the highest in the interview process. Additionally, Brandley Engineering has worked at other valley airports for over 25 years and is familiar with the area. During that time, they have overseen a variety of airport’s capital program, developed airport layout plans, and written grant applications that have resulted in the airport sponsors being offered over $20 million in AIP grant funding. While the Hanford Airport receives an annual Entitlement Grant of $150,000, the airport can also qualify for discretionary funding. FAA grants are not “competitive” per se, but the method in which the narrative is written and the ability to phase projects always helps the FAA in their decision on where the discretionary funding gets allocated.

Brandley Engineering has over 70 years of experience in airport design and FAA funded programs.

They specialize in pavement and infrastructure projects, with a strong geotechnical background.

Given that the Hanford Airport has mostly paving and sealing projects projected for the next 5 years, their proposal rated very strongly. Because the fee structure is provided by the FAA, price is not a deciding factor in this process.

It has been almost 20 years since the airport issued a request for Statements of Qualifications for engineering design services. FAA regulations require airport sponsors to go through a consultant selection process every 5-10 years. Accordingly, the FAA requested that the airport do so after our most recent grant agreement was closed. Staff timed the RFQ and subsequent review process to allow for a new contract period to commence with the new FAA project cycle, which begins each October (Federal Fiscal Year).

Work to be done under this contract will be accomplished over the course of several grant projects and services will be limited to projects which are expected to be initiated within five (5) years of the date of contract execution. The Scope of Work will require the consultant to provide professional services which are generally of an architectural, civil, geotechnical, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering nature. The basic services which will be required of the consultant are usually conducted in four distinct and sequential phases:

(a) Preliminary Phase – Activities required for defining the scope of a project, such as: (1) conferring with the City and the FAA; (2) planning and procuring the necessary surveys and studies required for preliminary design considerations; and (3) developing design schematics, preliminary layouts and cost estimates.

(b) Design Phase – Activities required to undertake and accomplish a full and complete project, such as: (1) conducting and attending meetings and design conferences; (2) collecting engineering data and undertaking field investigations; (3) performing geotechnical engineering studies and special environmental studies; (4) preparing necessary engineering reports and recommendations; (5) preparing detailed plans, specifications and cost estimates; and (6) printing and providing copies of engineering drawings and contract specifications.

(c) Bidding or Negotiation Phase – Assist the City in advertising and securing bids, negotiating for services, analyzing bid results, furnishing recommendations on award of contracts and preparing contract documents.

(d) Construction Phase – Basic services rendered after the award of a construction contract,

Page 34 of 474 ends

including: (1) providing consultation and advice to the City during all phases of construction; (2) attending pre-construction conferences; (3) inspecting work in progress and providing appropriate reports to the City; (4) reviewing and approving shop drawings for compliance with design concepts; (5) preparing and negotiating change orders: (6) determining amounts owed to contractors; and (7) making final inspections.

In addition to the above requirements, the consultant would be required to participate in the preparation of application documents for FAA grants. The consultant will also act as an extension of City staff and be responsible for the tracking of grants, preparation of Grant Drawdown documents, and all close-out documents and grant compliance.

Proposed projects to be included under the contract include, but are not limited to:

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST
2024 Pavement Maintenance Management Plan $165,000 2024 Design & Construct – New Fuel Island and Storage Tanks $1,890,570 2025 Design & Construct – Relocated Segmented Circle and Windcone $241,000

These projects are all part of the airport’s 5 year planned Airport Capital Program. Projects will be submitted to the FAA annually for consideration and the FAA will issue a grant offer for those projects that rate the highest on the funding matrix and then qualify for sufficient funding for the project. The year list above is simply for planning purposes. The actual year of funding will depend on when the FAA issues the grant for that particular project. All of the projects will be funded 95% by the FAA, with the local match coming from money budgeted in the Airport Enterprise Fund for capital improvements.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Brandley Engineering will be paid a negotiated fee, based on the value of the projects designed and in accordance with a fee schedule approved by the FAA. All fees are AIP eligible and covered under the individual Federal AIP Grants and the CalTrans Airport Matching Grant program.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2023.09.01 Brandley PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (redline for consultant)

2. Exhibit C combined-federal-contract-provisions Jan 2023

3. Brandley SOQ - Hanford, CA - Engineering3-signed

4. Brandley SOQ - Hanford, CA - Planning3-signed

5. Brandley SOQ - Hanford, CA - ConstMgmt3-signed

6. Hanford Airport - 2024-29 ACIP FINAL

Page 35 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 1 of 13 ends

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Professional, Planning, Architectural and Design/Engineering Services associated with Airport Development Projects for the Hanford Municipal Airport This Agreement, entered into this day of , 2023, by and between the City of Hanford, hereinafter referred to as the “CITY”, and Brandley Engineering, Inc. as the “CONSULTANT”. hereinafter referred to as the “CONSULTANT.”

W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the CITY is authorized and empowered to employ consultants and specialists in the performance of its duties and functions; and
WHEREAS, the CITY has the desire to secure certain technical and professional services to assist in the preparation and completion of the items of work described as “Scope of Work” in Exhibit “A”, and hereinafter referred to as the “PROJECT”; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents it is licensed, qualified and willing to provide such services pursuant to terms and conditions of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and CONSULTANT agree as follows:

I. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CONSULTANT
A. Authorized Scope of Work: The CONSULTANT agrees to perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to the CITY those tasks described in Exhibit “A” - Scope of Work, for the cost identified in Exhibit “B” - Project Fee(s). each Supplemental Services Agreement.

B. Additional Services: Incidental work related to the PROJECT and not provided for in Exhibit “A” may be needed during the performance of this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees to provide any and all additional services at the rates identified in attached Exhibit “C B” - Schedule of Fees for Professional Services. Such additional services shall not be performed by CONSULTANT without the written consent of CITY.

II. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
The CONSULTANT shall commence performance of this Agreement within five (5) days following receipt of fully executed Agreement and Notice to Proceed and shall complete the work within the timeframes outlined in Exhibit “A”, each Supplemental Services Agreement, unless otherwise extended in writing by CITY, in its sole discretion (to be altered if negotiated timeframes).

Page 36 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 2 of 13 ends

If the CONSULTANT fails to complete the PROJECT within the time specified, plus any extensions of time which may be granted, the CITY shall determine the percent of each work item completed and shall pay the CONSULTANT on that basis.

CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for delays which are due to causes beyond the CONSULTANT’s reasonable control. In the case of any such delay, the time of completion shall be extended accordingly in a writing signed by both parties.

III. COMPENSATION
A. Total Compensation: For services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the CITY agrees to pay and the CONSULTANT agrees to accept, as payment in full, a sum not to exceed the fee defined in each Supplemental Services Agreement.
dollars ($ ). This amount shall constitute
complete compensation, including document production and out-of-pocket expenses for all services for the work and PROJECT identified in Exhibits “A” and “B” each Supplemental Services Agreement.

B. Payment of Compensation: The CONSULTANT shall be compensated according to the progress payment schedule set forth in Exhibit “D” each Supplemental Service Agreement upon completion of percentage of each noted phase. The CONSULTANT shall be paid no later than thirty (30) days following submission of a written, verified billing to the CITY. Said billing shall include the percentage of each task completed to date and since the date of the preceding billing, if any.

IV. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
A. CITY: The shall represent the CITY in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered under this Agreement, except where approval of the City Council of the City of Hanford is specifically required.

B. CONSULTANT: Melissa Brandley shall represent and act as principle for CONSULTANT in all matters pertaining to the services to be rendered by it under this Agreement.

V. TERMINATION
The right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, may be exercised without prejudice to any other right or remedy to which the terminating party may be entitled at law or under this Agreement.

A. Termination By Either Party Without Cause: The CITY or CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written notice to the other of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination.

B. Termination of Agreement for Cause: The CITY may by written notice to the CONSULTANT specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement in any of the following circumstances:

Page 37 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 3 of 13 ends

1. If the CONSULTANT fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement within time(s) specified herein or any extension thereof; or

2. If the CONSULTANT fails to make progress under this Agreement as to endanger performance of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and does not correct such failure within a period of ten (10) days (or longer period as the CITY may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from the CITY specifying such failure.

C. Post-Termination:

1. In the event the CITY terminates this Agreement with or without cause, the CITY may procure, upon such terms and such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

2. Except with respect to defaults of subconsultants, the CONSULTANT shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform this Agreement arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONSULTANT. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God or of the public enemy, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, and unusually severe weather; but in the event the failure to perform is caused by the default of a subconsultant, the CONSULTANT shall not be liable for failure to perform, unless the services to be furnished by the subconsultant were obtainable from other sources in sufficient time and within budgeted resources to permit the CONSULTANT to meet the required delivery schedule or other performance requirements.

3. Should the Agreement be terminated with or without cause, the CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with all finished and unfinished documents, data, studies, services, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports, etc., prepared by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement.

4. Upon termination, with or without cause, CONSULTANT will be compensated for the services satisfactorily completed to the date of termination according to compensation provisions contained herein. In no event, shall the total compensation paid CONSULTANT exceed the total compensation agreed to herein.

5. If, after notice of termination of this Agreement, as provided for in this article, it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default under the provisions of this article, then the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the Agreement was terminated without cause.

6. Termination of this Agreement shall not terminate any obligation to indemnify, to maintain and make available any records pertaining to the Agreement, to cooperate with any audit, to be subject to offset, or to make any reports of pre-termination activities.

VI. INTEREST OF OFFICIALS AND THE CONSULTANT

Page 38 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 4 of 13 ends

A. No officer, member, or employee of the CITY who exercises any functions or responsibilities in the review or approval of this Agreement shall:

1. Participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which effects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he has, directly or indirectly, any interest; or

2. Have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof during his tenure or for one year thereafter.

B. The CONSULTANT hereby covenants that he has, at the time of the execution of this Agreement, no interest, and that he shall not acquire any interest in the future, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT further covenants that in the performance of this work, no person having any such interest shall be employed.

VII. NO PERSONNEL, AGENCY OR COMMISSION
The CONSULTANT warrants, by execution of this Agreement, that no personnel agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, excepting bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the CONSULTANT for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, the CITY shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from this Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.

VIII. SUBCONTRACTING
A. The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract or otherwise assign any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the CITY.

B. In no event shall the CONSULTANT subcontract work in excess of 50% of the contract amount, excluding specialized services. Specialized services are those items not ordinarily furnished by a consultant performing the particular type of project.

IX. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
In the performance of the services herein provided for, the CONSULTANT shall be, and is, an independent contractor and is not an agent or employee of the CITY. The CONSULTANT has and shall retain the right to exercise full control and supervision of all persons assisting the CONSULTANT in the performance of said services hereunder. The CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to the payment of its employees including compliance with social security and income tax withholding and all other regulations governing such matters.

X. SPECIFICATIONS

Page 39 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 5 of 13 ends

All specifications, manuals, standards, etc., either attached to this Agreement or incorporated by reference, are binding as to the performance of the work specified in this Agreement unless they are changed by written amendment to this Agreement modified in writing to incorporate such changes.

XI. DOCUMENTS/DATA
A. Ownership of Documents: All original papers and documents, produced as a result of this Agreement, shall become the property of the CITY. In addition, CITY shall be provided with access and use of any other papers and documents consistent with the purpose and scope of services covered by this Agreement. Any additional copies, not otherwise provided for herein, shall be the responsibility of the CITY.

Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by CITY or others on extensions of the PROJECT or on any other project. Any use of the completed documents for other projects and any use of incomplete documents without the specific written authorization from CONSULTANT will be at CITY’s sole risk and without liability to CONSULTANT. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to CONSULTANT’s deliverables under this Agreement by CITY or persons other than CONSULTANT is waived as against CONSULTANT, and the CITY assumes full responsibility for such changes unless the CITY has given CONSULTANT prior notice and has received from CONSULTANT written consent for such changes.

B. Publication: No report, information, or other data given or prepared or assembled by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, shall be made available to any individual or organization by the CONSULTANT without the prior written approval of the CITY. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the CONSULTANT shall not be required to protect or hold in confidence and confidential information which (1) is or becomes available to the public with the prior written consent of the CITY; (2) must be disclosed to comply with law; or (3) must be disclosed in connection with any legal proceedings.

C. Copyrights: The CONSULTANT shall be free to copyright material developed under this Agreement with the provision that the CITY be given a nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use the material for government or public purposes.

XII. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
A. As respects acts, errors, or omissions in the performance of professional services, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officers, a n d employees, and CITY designated volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs, liability for damages or consequential damages arising directly out of but only to the extent actually caused by CONSULTANT’s negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of his/her services under the terms of this Agreement, except to the extent those arise out of the negligence of CITY. CONSULTANT’s obligation to pay for any of the indemnitee’s defense shall not exceed CONSULTANT’S proportionate percentage of

Page 40 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 6 of 13 ends

fault determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or established under a non-judicial settlement document executed by CONSULTANT.

B. CITY agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, and designated volunteers from and against any and all losses, defense costs, liability or consequential damages to the extent arising out of CITY’S negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of this Agreement.

C. As respects all acts or omissions which do not arise directly out of the performance of services, including but not limited to those acts or omissions normally covered by general and automobile liability insurance, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, defend (at CITY’s option), and hold harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officers, agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, defense costs, liability, or consequential damages of any kind or nature arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT’s (or CONSULTANT’s subcontractors, if any) performance or failure to perform, under the terms of this Agreement; except to the extent those which arise out of the negligence of CITY.

D. Without limiting CITY’s right to indemnification, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall secure prior to commencing any activities under this Agreement, and maintain during the term of this Agreement, insurance coverage as follows:

1. Workers’ compensation insurance as required by California statues.

2. Commercial general liability insurance with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for Premises and Operations, Contractual Liability, Personal Injury Liability, Products and Completed Operations Liability, Broad Form Property Damage (if applicable), Independent Contractor’s Liability (if applicable).

3. Professional liability insurance coverage, in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).

4. Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles and shall be provided by a business automobile policy.

E. CITY’S Risk Manager is hereby authorized to reduce the requirements set forth above in the event he/she determines that such reduction is in the CITY’S best interest.

F. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall contain the following clause:
“This insurance shall not be canceled, limited in scope or coverage, or non-renewed until after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City Clerk, City of Hanford, 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, CA 93230.”

Page 41 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 7 of 13 ends

In addition, the commercial general liability and comprehensive automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following clauses:
“It is agreed that any insurance maintained by the City of Hanford shall apply in excess of and not contribute with insurance provided by this policy.” “The City of Hanford, its officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers are added as additional insureds as respects operations and activities of, or on behalf of the named insured, performed under contract with the City of Hanford.” G. Prior to commencing any work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall deliver to CITY insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required by this Agreement, and including the applicable clauses referenced above. Within thirty (30) days of the execution date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY endorsements to the above-required policies, which add to these policies the applicable clauses referenced above. Said endorsements shall be signed by an authorized representative of the insurance company and shall include the signatory’s company affiliation and title. Should it be deemed necessary by CITY, it shall be CONSULTANT’s responsibility to see that CITY receives documentation acceptable to CITY which sustains that the individual signing said endorsements is indeed authorized to do so by the insurance company. CITY has the right to demand, and to receive within a reasonable time period, copies of any insurance policies required under this Agreement.

H. In addition to any other remedies CITY may have if CONSULTANT fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, CITY may, at its sole option:

1. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement; or

2. Order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to CONSULTANT hereunder until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; or

3. Terminate this Agreement.

Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies CITY may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONSULTANT’s failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements.

Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from CONSULTANT’s or its subcontractor’s performance of the work covered under this Agreement.

XIII. INSURANCE
a. CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of this Agreement, the following insurance policies.

Page 42 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 8 of 13 ends

i. Workers Compensation Coverage. As required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. ii. Commercial General Liability (CGL) Coverage. Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 0001, including products and completed operations, with a limit of no less than TWO MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, and a general aggregate limit of no less than FOUR MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($4,000,000). iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. ISO Form Number CA 0001 covering any auto (Code 1), or if CONSULTANT has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned),with a limit no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
iv. Professional Liability Coverage. CONSULTANT will maintain Professional Liability coverage with limits no less than TWO MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($2,000,000) per occurrence or claim, and TWO MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($2,000,000) policy aggregate.

If CONSULTANT maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by CONSULTANT.

CONSULTANT’s insurance policies shall be “occurrence” policies and not “claims-made” coverage except for Professional Liability Coverage. “Claims-made” policies must satisfy the following requirements: (i) the retroactive date of coverage must be shown and must precede the effective date of the contract; (ii) coverage shall be maintained and evidence of coverage must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract work; and (iii) if coverage is canceled or non-renewed and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date preceding the contract effective date, CONSULTANT must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

CONSULTANT may maintain an Umbrella policy in conjunction with the insurance policies referenced above. In such case, CONSULTANT shall be deemed to have satisfied the insurance requirements of this contract as long as: (i) the coverage limits of the Umbrella policy and of the underlying liability policy(ies), when combined, satisfy each of the per occurrence and aggregate requirements identified in this section; and (ii) coverage under the Umbrella policy is as broad as and includes all incidents and events covered by the underlying insurance that it supplements. b. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. c. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
i. The CITY and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL and automobile liability policies with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of CONSULTANT including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations; products used by CONSULTANT; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by CONSULTANT. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to CONSULTANT’s insurance at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33 or CG 20 38 and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the CITY and its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Page 43 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 9 of 13 ends

ii. For any claims related to this contract, CONSULTANT’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the CITY and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY and/or its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be in excess of CONSULTANT’s insurance and shall be non- contributory.
iii. Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the CITY.

Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII.

CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the CONSULTANT’s obligation to provide them. The CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. d. CONSULTANT hereby grants to the CITY and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY and/or its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain endorsements necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

XIII.XIV. NON-DISCRIMINATION
CONSULTANT and all subcontractors shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the Consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Agreement, which may result in the termination of this Agreement.

XIV.XV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Asbestos and Hazardous Materials: In providing its services hereunder, CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for identification, handling, containment, abatement, or in any other respect, for any asbestos or hazardous material if such is present in connection with the PROJECT. In the event the CITY becomes aware of the presence of asbestos or hazardous material at the jobsite, CITY shall be responsible for complying with all applicable federal and state rules and regulations, and shall immediately notify CONSULTANT, who shall then be entitled to cease any of its services that may be affected by such presence, without liability to CONSULTANT arising therefrom.

B. Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of any successors to or assigns of the parties.

Page 44 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 10 of 13 ends

C. Prohibition of Assignment: Neither the CITY nor CONSULTANT shall assign, delegate or transfer their rights and duties in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party.

D. Firearms Prohibited: Guns may not be carried by contractors/vendors/consultants while working on City of Hanford premises without the expressed written approval of a City of Hanford Department Head, or an exemption in the contract. If a contractor/ vendor/consultant is caught carrying a gun, without City permission, their contract will be terminated.

E. Dispute/Governing Law: Any dispute not resolvable by informal arbitration between the parties to this Agreement shall be adjudicated in a Court of Law under the laws of the State of California.

F. Notices: Notice shall be sufficient hereunder if personally served upon the City Clerk of the CITY or an officer or principal of the CONSULTANT, or if sent via the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

CITY OF HANFORD CONSULTANT
319 N. Douty Street Brandley Engineering, Inc.

Hanford, CA 93230 6125 King Rd. Ste 201
Attention: City Clerk Loomis, CA 95650
Attention: Melissa Brandley
G. Jurisdiction/Venue/Waiver Of Removal: This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in that State. Any action brought to interpret or enforce this Agreement, or any of the terms or conditions hereof, shall be brought in Tulare Kings County, California. The CONSULTANT hereby expressly waives any right to remove any action to a county other than Tulare Kings County as permitted pursuant to Section 394 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.

H. Integration/Modification: This Agreement and each of the exhibits referenced herein, which are incorporated by reference, represents the entire understanding of the CITY and the CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by the CITY and the CONSULTANT.

I. Conflict With Law: If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null and void insofar as it is in conflict with said law, but the remainder of the Agreement shall be in full force and effect.

J. Attorney’s Fees: In the event either party commences any action, arbitration or legal proceedings for the enforcement of this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the court or arbitrator, shall be entitled to recovery of its attorney’s fees and court costs incurred in the action brought thereon.

K. Construction: This Agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise on the part of each party and the parties agree, notwithstanding Civil Code Section 1654, that in the event of uncertainty the language will not be construed against the party causing the uncertainty to exist.

Page 45 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 11 of 13 ends

L. Authority: Each signatory to this Agreement represents that it is authorized to enter into this Agreement and to bind the party to which its signature represents.

M. Headings: Section headings are provided for organizational purposes only and do not in any manner affect the scope or intent of the provisions thereunder.

XVI. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the ENGINEER, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest, agrees to all the federal contract provisions provided in “Exhibit C,” Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF HANFORD CONSULTANT City Manager Melissa Brandley, Secretary, CFO
Approved as to Form
City Attorney
Project Manager
Attachments:

Page 46 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 12 of 13 ends

Exhibit “A”: Scope of Work
The solicited scope of services includes, but is not limited to, the following tasks:
•Assist in preparation and development of the Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP). •Prepare necessary applications and documentation for Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant funding.
•Project planning; architecture, landscape architecture, and associated engineering; airfield civil, geotechnical, and electrical engineering for ACIP projects including Terminal, Runways, and Taxiways, aprons, navaids, lighting, miscellaneous airport facilities and associated tasks.
•Project planning, architecture, landscape architecture, and associated engineering for projects in addition to the ACIP, such as hangars, parking lots, fuel island, and other airport projects as may be deemed appropriate. •Environmental studies, assessments, and reports to include requirements of CEQA, NEPA, and associated regulations; and representing the County in discussions with regulatory agencies. •Assistance during bidding and award of construction projects and construction management including review of material submittals and shop drawings, construction oversight, resident engineering, testing and inspection. •Miscellaneous airport planning, engineering and consulting support services as may be required from time to time by the City of Hanford including but not limited to Pavement Maintenance Management Plan, pavement design and evaluation, geotechnical studies, drainage studies, cost estimating, siting studies, surveying and other miscellaneous engineering services as needed. These consultant services may include representing the City in discussions with FAA regarding the work program, grant requirements and project documentation. •Airport Planning Services including Airport Layout Plan Updates and Narrative Reports, Property Maps and Surveys, Master Planning, Land Use Planning, Land Acquisition, FAA compliance, AGIS Surveys and Obstruction Analysis and other miscellaneous planning services as needed.
•Future AIP projects include but are not limited to:
oWindsock Relocation Project
oSouth Transient Apron Reconstruction
oFuel Farm and Island design and construction
oT-Hangar Design and Development
oAcquire Land for New General Aviation Terminal
oAirport Layout Plan Update

Page 47 of 474 ends

Airport Engineering Services

Page 13 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT “B” Schedule of Fees for Professional Services
Personnel
Principal Engineer ............................................$300.00/Hour Senior Engineer................................................$180.00/Hour Junior Engineer ................................................$120.00/Hour Senior Drafter ...................................................$120.00/Hour Junior Drafter....................................................$100.00/Hour Laboratory Technician........................................$90.00/Hour Laboratory Apprentice ........................................$50.00/Hour Project Administrator ........................................$100.00/Hour Clerical ...............................................................$85.00/Hour Resident Engineer............................................$190.00/Hour Senior Inspector ...............................................$180.00/Hour Apprentice ..........................................................$95.00/Hour

Travel and Vehicle Rental
Per Diem ...............................................................$195/Day* Vehicle Rental...............................$50.00/Day + $0.655/Mile Subconsultants
Consulting Services, Testing Services ................Cost + 10% *Subject to change based on U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) Per Diem Rates.

Page 48 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 1

EX H I B I T C – CO N T R A C T PR O V I S I O N S F O R OB L I G A T E D SP O N S O R S

A N D AI R P O R T IM P R O V E M E N T PR O G R A M PR O J E C T S C 1 A C C E S S T O R E C O R D S A N D R E P O R T S

S O U R C E
2 CFR § 200.334
2 CFR § 200.337
FAA Order 5100.38
The Contractor must maintain an acceptable cost accounting system. The Contractor agrees to provide the Owner, the Federal Aviation Administration and the Comptroller General of the United States or any of their duly authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers and records of the Contractor which are directly pertinent to the specific contract for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions. The Contractor agrees to maintain all books, records and reports required under this contract for a period of not less than three years after final payment is made and all pending matters are closed.

C 2 B R E A C H O F C O N T R A C T T E R M S

S O U R C E
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(A)
Any violation or breach of terms of this contract on the part of the Consultant or its subcontractors may result in the suspension or termination of this contract or such other action that may be necessary to enforce the rights of the parties of this agreement.

Owner will provide Consultant written notice that describes the nature of the breach and corrective actions the Consultant must undertake in order to avoid termination of the contract. Owner reserves the right to withhold payments to Contractor until such time the Contractor corrects the breach or the Owner elects to terminate the contract. The Owner’s notice will identify a specific date by which the Consultant must correct the breach. Owner may proceed with termination of the contract if the Consultant fails to correct the breach by the deadline indicated in the Owner’s notice.

The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents and the rights and remedies available thereunder are in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law.

C 3 C I V I L R I G H T S - G E N E R A L

S O U R C E
49 USC § 47123

GENERAL CIVIL RIGHTS PROVISIONS
In all its activities within the scope of its airport program, the Contractor agrees to comply with pertinent statutes, Executive Orders, and such rules as identified in Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including

Page 49 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 2
limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting from Federal assistance.

This provision is in addition to that required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The above provision binds the Contractor and subcontractors from the bid solicitation period through the completion of the contract.

C 4 C I V I L R I G H T S – T I T L E V I A S S U R A N C E

S O U R C E
49 USC § 47123
FAA Order 1400.11
Title VI Solicitation Notice:

The City of Hanford, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 USC §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders or offerors that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and no businesses will be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability in consideration for an award.

Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities During the performance of this contract, the Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”) agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to:
•Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); •49 CFR part 21 (Non-discrimination in Federally-Assisted programs of the Department of Transportation—Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964); •The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 USC § 4601) (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); •Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC § 794 et seq.), as amended (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR part 27 (Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance); •The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 USC § 6101 et seq.) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
•Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (49 USC § 47123), as amended (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); •The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (PL 100-259) (broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not);

Page 50 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 3
•Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101, et seq) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities) as implemented by U.S. Department of Transportation regulations at 49 CFR parts 37 and 38; •The Federal Aviation Administration’s Nondiscrimination statute (49 USC § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); •Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (ensures nondiscrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations); •Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs [70 Fed.

Reg. 74087 (2005)];
•Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 USC § 1681, et seq).

Compliance with Nondiscrimination Requirements:

During the performance of this contract, the Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”), agrees as follows:

1.Compliance with Regulations: The Contractor (hereinafter includes consultants) will comply with the Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract.

2.Nondiscrimination: The Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The Contractor will not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR part 21.

3.Solicitations for Subcontracts, including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier will be notified by the Contractor of the contractor’s obligations under this contract and the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

4.Information and Reports: The Contractor will provide all information and reports required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the Contractor will so certify to the Sponsor or the Federal

Page 51 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 4
Aviation Administration, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.

5.Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a Contractor’s noncompliance with the non- discrimination provisions of this contract, the Sponsor will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Aviation Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
a. Withholding payments to the Contractor under the contract until the Contractor complies; and/or
b. Cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.

6.Incorporation of Provisions: The Contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs one through six in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto. The Contractor will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation by a subcontractor, or supplier because of such direction, the Contractor may request the Sponsor to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the Sponsor. In addition, the Contractor may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

C 5 C L E A N A I R A N D W A T E R P O L L U T I O N C O N T R O L

S O U R C E
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(G)
42 USC § 7401, et seq
33 USC § 1251, et seq
Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, and regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 USC §§ 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 USC §§ 1251-1387). The Contractor agrees to report any violation to the Owner immediately upon discovery.

The Owner assumes responsibility for notifying the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Contractor must include this requirement in all subcontracts that exceed $150,000.

C 6 C O N T R A C T W O R K H O U R S A N D S A F E T Y S T A N D A R D S A C T

R E Q U I R E M E N T S

S O U R C E
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(E)
2 CFR § 5.5(b)
40 USC § 3702
40 USC § 3704

1. Overtime Requirements.

No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic, including

Page 52 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 5
watchmen and guards, in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.

2. Violation; Liability for Unpaid Wages; Liquidated Damages.

In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, the Contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, in the sum of $29 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause.

3. Withholding for Unpaid Wages and Liquidated Damages.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or the Owner shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (2) of this clause.

4. Subcontractors.

The Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) and also a clause requiring the subcontractor to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this clause.

C 7 D E B A R M E N T A N D S U S P E N S I O N

S O U R C E
2 CFR Part 180 (Subpart B)
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(H)
2 CFR Part 1200
DOT Order 4200.5
Executive Orders 12549 and 12689

CERTIFICATION OF OFFEROR/BIDDER REGARDING DEBARMENT
By submitting a bid/proposal under this solicitation, the bidder or offeror certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred or suspended by any Federal department or agency from participation in this transaction.

Page 53 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 6

CERTIFICATION OF LOWER TIER CONTRACTORS REGARDING DEBARMENT The successful bidder, by administering each lower tier subcontract that exceeds $25,000 as a “covered transaction”, must confirm each lower tier participant of a “covered transaction” under the project is not presently debarred or otherwise disqualified from participation in this federally-assisted project. The successful bidder will accomplish this by:

1. Checking the System for Award Management at website: http://www.sam.gov.

2. Collecting a certification statement similar to the Certification of Offeror /Bidder Regarding Debarment, above.

3. Inserting a clause or condition in the covered transaction with the lower tier contract.

If the Federal Aviation Administration later determines that a lower tier participant failed to disclose to a higher tier participant that it was excluded or disqualified at the time it entered the covered transaction, the FAA may pursue any available remedies, including suspension and debarment of the non-compliant participant.

C 8 D I S A D V A N T A G E D B U S I N E S S E N T E R P R I S E

S O U R C E
49 CFR Part 26
Contract Assurance (49 CFR § 26.13)
The Contractor, subrecipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The Contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the Contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to:
1) Withholding monthly progress payments;
2) Assessing sanctions;
3) Liquidated damages; and/or
4) Disqualifying the Contractor from future bidding as non-responsible.

Prompt Payment (49 CFR § 26.29) –
The prime contractor agrees to pay each subcontractor under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than 7 days from the receipt of each payment the prime contractor receives from City of Hanford. The prime contractor agrees further to return retainage payments to each subcontractor within 7 days after the subcontractor’s work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the City of Hanford. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subcontractors.

Page 54 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 7
Termination of DBE Subcontracts (49 CFR § 26.53(f)) –
The prime contractor must not terminate a DBE subcontractor listed in response to Supplemental Services Agreement No. 15 (or an approved substitute DBE firm) without prior written consent of City of Hanford.

This includes, but is not limited to, instances in which the prime contractor seeks to perform work originally designated for a DBE subcontractor with its own forces or those of an affiliate, a non-DBE firm, or with another DBE firm.

The prime contractor shall utilize the specific DBEs listed to perform the work and supply the materials for which each is listed unless the contractor obtains written consent City of Hanford. Unless City of Hanford consent is provided, the prime contractor shall not be entitled to any payment for work or material unless it is performed or supplied by the listed DBE.

City of Hanford may provide such written consent only if City of Hanford agrees, for reasons stated in the concurrence document, that the prime contractor has good cause to terminate the DBE firm. For purposes of this paragraph, good cause includes the circumstances listed in 49 CFR §26.53.

Before transmitting to City of Hanford its request to terminate and/or substitute a DBE subcontractor, the prime contractor must give notice in writing to the DBE subcontractor, with a copy to City of Hanford, of its intent to request to terminate and/or substitute, and the reason for the request.

The prime contractor must give the DBE five days to respond to the prime contractor's notice and advise City of Hanford and the contractor of the reasons, if any, why it objects to the proposed termination of its subcontract and why City of Hanford should not approve the prime contractor's action. If required in a particular case as a matter of public necessity (e.g., safety) City of Hanford may provide a response period shorter than five days.

In addition to post-award terminations, the provisions of this section apply to preaward deletions of or substitutions for DBE firms put forward by offerors in negotiated procurements.

C 9 D I S T R A C T E D D R I V I N G

S O U R C E
Executive Order 13513
DOT Order 3902.10

TEXTING WHEN DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, “Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving”, (10/1/2009) and DOT Order 3902.10, “Text Messaging While Driving”, (12/30/2009), the Federal Aviation Administration encourages recipients of Federal grant funds to adopt and enforce safety policies that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while driving when performing work related to a grant or subgrant.

In support of this initiative, the Owner encourages the Contractor to promote policies and initiatives for its employees and other work personnel that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies that ban text messaging while driving motor vehicles while performing work activities associated with the project. The Contractor must include the substance of this clause in all sub-tier contracts exceeding $10,000 that involve driving a motor vehicle in performance of work activities associated with the project.

Page 55 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 8
C 1 0 P R O H I B I T I O N O N C E R T A I N T E L E C O M M U N I C A T I O N S A N D V I D E O

S U R V E I L L A N C E S E R V I C E S O R E Q U I P M E N T

S O U R C E
2 CFR § 200, Appendix II(K)
2 CFR § 200.216
Contractor and Subcontractor agree to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to use and procurement of certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment in compliance with the National Defense Authorization Act [Public Law 115-232 § 889(f)(1)].

C 1 1 E Q U A L E M P L O Y M E N T O P P O R T U N I T Y ( E E O )

S O U R C E
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(C)
41 CFR § 60-1.4
41 CFR § 60-4.3
Executive Order 11246

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE
During the performance of this contract, the Contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identify, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff, or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The Contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.

Page 56 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 9
(4) The Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or workers’ representative of the Contractor’s commitments under this section 202 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5) The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6) The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
(7) In the event of the Contractor’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any such rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The Contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The Contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as may be directed by the Secretary of Labor as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event the contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction, the Contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

STANDARD FEDERAL EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS

1. As used in these specifications:
a. “Covered area” means the geographical area described in the solicitation from which this contract resulted;
b. “Director” means Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), U.S.

Department of Labor, or any person to whom the Director delegates authority; c. “Employer identification number” means the Federal social security number used on the Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return, U.S. Treasury Department Form 941; d. “Minority” includes:
(1) Black (all persons having origins in any of the Black African racial groups not of Hispanic origin);

Page 57 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 10
(2) Hispanic (all persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race);
(3) Asian and Pacific Islander (all persons having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian Subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands); and (4) American Indian or Alaskan native (all persons having origins in any of the original peoples of North America and maintaining identifiable tribal affiliations through membership and participation or community identification).

2. Whenever the Contractor, or any subcontractor at any tier, subcontracts a portion of the work involving any construction trade, it shall physically include in each subcontract in excess of $10,000 the provisions of these specifications and the Notice which contains the applicable goals for minority and female participation and which is set forth in the solicitations from which this contract resulted.

3. If the Contractor is participating (pursuant to 41 CFR part 60-4.5) in a Hometown Plan approved by the U.S. Department of Labor in the covered area either individually or through an association, its affirmative action obligations on all work in the Plan area (including goals and timetables) shall be in accordance with that Plan for those trades which have unions participating in the Plan. Contractors must be able to demonstrate their participation in and compliance with the provisions of any such Hometown Plan. Each contractor or subcontractor participating in an approved plan is individually required to comply with its obligations under the EEO clause and to make a good faith effort to achieve each goal under the Plan in each trade in which it has employees. The overall good faith performance by other contractors or subcontractors toward a goal in an approved Plan does not excuse any covered contractor’s or subcontractor’s failure to take good faith efforts to achieve the Plan goals and timetables.

4. The Contractor shall implement the specific affirmative action standards provided in paragraphs 7a through 7p of these specifications. The goals set forth in the solicitation from which this contract resulted are expressed as percentages of the total hours of employment and training of minority and female utilization the Contractor should reasonably be able to achieve in each construction trade in which it has employees in the covered area. Covered construction contractors performing construction work in a geographical areas where they do not have a Federal or federally assisted construction contract shall apply the minority and female goals established for the geographical area where the work is being performed.

Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and such notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office or from Federal procurement contracting officers. The Contractor is expected to make substantially uniform progress in meeting its goals in each craft during the period specified.

5. Neither the provisions of any collective bargaining agreement, nor the failure by a union with whom the Contractor has a collective bargaining agreement, to refer either minorities or women shall excuse the Contractor’s obligations under these specifications, Executive Order 11246, or the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.

6. In order for the nonworking training hours of apprentices and trainees to be counted in meeting the goals, such apprentices and trainees must be employed by the Contractor during the training period, and the Contractor must have made a commitment to employ the apprentices and trainees at the completion of their training, subject to the availability of employment opportunities. Trainees must be trained pursuant to training programs approved by the U.S. Department of Labor.

Page 58 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 11

7. The Contractor shall take specific affirmative actions to ensure equal employment opportunity. The evaluation of the Contractor’s compliance with these specifications shall be based upon its effort to achieve maximum results from its actions. The Contractor shall document these efforts fully, and shall implement affirmative action steps at least as extensive as the following:
a. Ensure and maintain a working environment free of harassment, intimidation, and coercion at all sites, and in all facilities at which the Contractor’s employees are assigned to work. The Contractor, where possible, will assign two or more women to each construction project. The Contractor shall specifically ensure that all foremen, superintendents, and other onsite supervisory personnel are aware of and carry out the Contractor’s obligation to maintain such a working environment, with specific attention to minority or female individuals working at such sites or in such facilities. b. Establish and maintain a current list of minority and female recruitment sources, provide written notification to minority and female recruitment sources and to community organizations when the Contractor or its unions have employment opportunities available, and maintain a record of the organizations’ responses.
c. Maintain a current file of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of each minority and female off-the-street applicant and minority or female referral from a union, a recruitment source, or community organization and of what action was taken with respect to each such individual. If such individual was sent to the union hiring hall for referral and was not referred back to the Contractor by the union or, if referred, not employed by the Contractor, this shall be documented in the file with the reason therefor, along with whatever additional actions the Contractor may have taken. d. Provide immediate written notification to the Director when the union or unions with which the Contractor has a collective bargaining agreement has not referred to the Contractor a minority person or woman sent by the Contractor, or when the Contractor has other information that the union referral process has impeded the Contractor’s efforts to meet its obligations. e. Develop on-the-job training opportunities and/or participate in training programs for the area which expressly include minorities and women, including upgrading programs and apprenticeship and trainee programs relevant to the Contractor’s employment needs, especially those programs funded or approved by the Department of Labor. The Contractor shall provide notice of these programs to the sources compiled under 7b above.
f. Disseminate the Contractor’s EEO policy by providing notice of the policy to unions and training programs and requesting their cooperation in assisting the Contractor in meeting its EEO obligations; by including it in any policy manual and collective bargaining agreement; by publicizing it in the company newspaper, annual report, etc.; by specific review of the policy with all management personnel and with all minority and female employees at least once a year; and by posting the company EEO policy on bulletin boards accessible to all employees at each location where construction work is performed.
g. Review, at least annually, the company’s EEO policy and affirmative action obligations under these specifications with all employees having any responsibility for hiring, assignment, layoff, termination, or other employment decisions including specific review of these items with onsite supervisory personnel such superintendents, general foremen, etc., prior to the initiation of construction work at any job site. A written record shall be made and maintained identifying the time

Page 59 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 12
and place of these meetings, persons attending, subject matter discussed, and disposition of the subject matter.
h. Disseminate the Contractor’s EEO policy externally by including it in any advertising in the news media, specifically including minority and female news media, and providing written notification to and discussing the Contractor’s EEO policy with other contractors and subcontractors with whom the Contractor does or anticipates doing business.
i. Direct its recruitment efforts, both oral and written, to minority, female, and community organizations, to schools with minority and female students and to minority and female recruitment and training organizations serving the Contractor’s recruitment area and employment needs. Not later than one month prior to the date for the acceptance of applications for apprenticeship or other training by any recruitment source, the Contractor shall send written notification to organizations such as the above, describing the openings, screening procedures, and tests to be used in the selection process. j. Encourage present minority and female employees to recruit other minority persons and women and, where reasonable, provide after school, summer, and vacation employment to minority and female youth both on the site and in other areas of a contractor’s work force. k. Validate all tests and other selection requirements where there is an obligation to do so under 41 CFR part 60-3.
l. Conduct, at least annually, an inventory and evaluation at least of all minority and female personnel, for promotional opportunities and encourage these employees to seek or to prepare for, through appropriate training, etc., such opportunities.
m. Ensure that seniority practices, job classifications, work assignments, and other personnel practices do not have a discriminatory effect by continually monitoring all personnel and employment related activities to ensure that the EEO policy and the Contractor’s obligations under these specifications are being carried out.
n. Ensure that all facilities and company activities are nonsegregated except that separate or single- user toilet and necessary changing facilities shall be provided to assure privacy between the sexes. o. Document and maintain a record of all solicitations of offers for subcontracts from minority and female construction contractors and suppliers, including circulation of solicitations to minority and female contractor associations and other business associations. p. Conduct a review, at least annually, of all supervisor’s adherence to and performance under the Contractor’s EEO policies and affirmative action obligations.

8. Contractors are encouraged to participate in voluntary associations, which assist in fulfilling one or more of their affirmative action obligations (7a through 7p). The efforts of a contractor association, joint contractor-union, contractor-community, or other similar group of which the Contractor is a member and participant may be asserted as fulfilling any one or more of its obligations under 7a through 7p of these specifications provided that the Contractor actively participates in the group, makes every effort to assure that the group has a positive impact on the employment of minorities and women in the industry, ensures that the concrete benefits of the program are reflected in the Contractor’s minority and female workforce participation, makes a good faith effort to meet its individual goals and timetables, and can provide access

Page 60 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 13
to documentation which demonstrates the effectiveness of actions taken on behalf of the Contractor. The obligation to comply, however, is the Contractor’s and failure of such a group to fulfill an obligation shall not be a defense for the Contractor’s noncompliance.

9. A single goal for minorities and a separate single goal for women have been established. The Contractor, however, is required to provide equal employment opportunity and to take affirmative action for all minority groups, both male and female, and all women, both minority and non-minority.

Consequently, the Contractor may be in violation of the Executive Order if a particular group is employed in a substantially disparate manner (for example, even though the Contractor has achieved its goals for women generally, the Contractor may be in violation of the Executive Order if a specific minority group of women is underutilized).

10. The Contractor shall not use the goals and timetables or affirmative action standards to discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.

11. The Contractor shall not enter into any subcontract with any person or firm debarred from Government contracts pursuant to Executive Order 11246.

12. The Contractor shall carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of these specifications and of the Equal Opportunity Clause, including suspension, termination, and cancellation of existing subcontracts as may be imposed or ordered pursuant to Executive Order 11246, as amended, and its implementing regulations, by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Any contractor who fails to carry out such sanctions and penalties shall be in violation of these specifications and Executive Order 11246, as amended.

13. The Contractor, in fulfilling its obligations under these specifications, shall implement specific affirmative action steps, at least as extensive as those standards prescribed in paragraph 7 of these specifications, so as to achieve maximum results from its efforts to ensure equal employment opportunity.

If the Contractor fails to comply with the requirements of the Executive Order, the implementing regulations, or these specifications, the Director shall proceed in accordance with 41 CFR part 60-4.8.

14. The Contractor shall designate a responsible official to monitor all employment related activity to ensure that the company EEO policy is being carried out, to submit reports relating to the provisions hereof as may be required by the Government, and to keep records. Records shall at least include for each employee, the name, address, telephone numbers, construction trade, union affiliation if any, employee identification number when assigned, social security number, race, sex, status (e.g., mechanic, apprentice, trainee, helper, or laborer), dates of changes in status, hours worked per week in the indicated trade, rate of pay, and locations at which the work was performed. Records shall be maintained in an easily understandable and retrievable form; however, to the degree that existing records satisfy this requirement, contractors shall not be required to maintain separate records.

15. Nothing herein provided shall be construed as a limitation upon the application of other laws which establish different standards of compliance or upon the application of requirements for the hiring of local or other area residents (e.g. those under the Public Works Employment Act of 1977 and the Community Development Block Grant Program).

Page 61 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 14
C 1 2 F E D E R A L F A I R L A B O R S T A N D A R D S A C T ( F E D E R A L M I N I M U M W A G E )

S O U R C E
29 USC § 201, et seq
2 CFR § 200.430
All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the provisions of 29 CFR part 201, et seq, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The FLSA sets minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards for full and part-time workers.

The Consultant has full responsibility to monitor compliance to the referenced statute or regulation. The Consultant must address any claims or disputes that arise from this requirement directly with the U.S.

Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division.

C 1 3 L O B B Y I N G A N D I N F L U E N C I N G F E D E R A L E M P L O Y E E S

S O U R C E
31 USC § 1352 – Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(I)
49 CFR Part 20, Appendix A

CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
The Bidder or Offeror certifies by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Bidder or Offeror, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this

Page 62 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 15
transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

C 1 4 O C C U P A T I O N A L S A F E T Y A N D H E A L T H A C T O F 1 9 7 0

S O U R C E
29 CFR Part 1910
All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the requirements of 29 CFR Part 1910 with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The employer must provide a work environment that is free from recognized hazards that may cause death or serious physical harm to the employee. The employer retains full responsibility to monitor its compliance and their subcontractor’s compliance with the applicable requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 CFR Part 1910). The employer must address any claims or disputes that pertain to a referenced requirement directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

C 1 5 S E I S M I C S A F E T Y

S O U R C E
49 CFR Part 41
In the performance of design services, the Consultant agrees to furnish a building design and associated construction specification that conform to a building code standard that provides a level of seismic safety substantially equivalent to standards as established by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). Local building codes that model their building code after the current version of the International Building Code (IBC) meet the NEHRP equivalency level for seismic safety. At the conclusion of the design services, the Consultant agrees to furnish the Owner a “certification of compliance” that attests conformance of the building design and the construction specifications with the seismic standards of NEHRP or an equivalent building code.

C 1 6 T A X D E L I N Q U E N C Y A N D F E L O N Y C O N V I C T I O N S

S O U R C E
Section 8113 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (Public Law 117-103) and similar provisions in subsequent appropriations acts.

DOT Order 4200.6 – Appropriations Act Requirements for Procurement and Non-Procurement Regarding Tax Delinquency and Felony Convictions

Page 63 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 16

CERTIFICATION OF OFFEROR/BIDDER REGARDING TAX DELINQUENCY AND

FELONY CONVICTIONS
The applicant must complete the following two certification statements. The applicant must indicate its current status as it relates to tax delinquency and felony conviction by inserting a checkmark () in the space following the applicable response. The applicant agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification in all lower tier subcontracts.

Certifications
1)The applicant represents that it is ( ) is not (  ) a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability. 2)The applicant represents that it is ( ) is not (  ) a corporation that was convicted of a criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

Note
If an applicant responds in the affirmative to either of the above representations, the applicant is ineligible to receive an award unless the Sponsor has received notification from the agency suspension and debarment official (SDO) that the SDO has considered suspension or debarment and determined that further action is not required to protect the Government’s interests. The applicant therefore must provide information to the owner about its tax liability or conviction to the Owner, who will then notify the FAA Airports District Office, which will then notify the agency’s SDO to facilitate completion of the required considerations before award decisions are made.

Term Definitions
Felony conviction: Felony conviction means a conviction within the preceding twenty four (24) months of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law and includes conviction of an offense defined in a section of the U.S. Code that specifically classifies the offense as a felony and conviction of an offense that is classified as a felony under 18 USC § 3559.

Tax Delinquency: A tax delinquency is any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

C 1 7 T E R M I N A T I O N O F C O N T R A C T

S O U R C E
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(B)
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5370-10, Section 80-09

TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
The Owner may, by written notice to the Consultant, terminate this Agreement for its convenience and without cause or default on the part of Consultant. Upon receipt of the notice of termination, except as explicitly directed by the Owner, the Contractor must immediately discontinue all services affected.

Page 64 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 17
Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete.

Owner agrees to make just and equitable compensation to the Consultant for satisfactory work completed up through the date the Consultant receives the termination notice. Compensation will not include anticipated profit on non-performed services.

Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

TERMINATION FOR CAUSE (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause if the other party fails to fulfill its obligations that are essential to the completion of the work per the terms and conditions of the Agreement. The party initiating the termination action must allow the breaching party an opportunity to dispute or cure the breach.

The terminating party must provide the breaching party [7] days advance written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement. The notice must specify the nature and extent of the breach, the conditions necessary to cure the breach, and the effective date of the termination action. The rights and remedies in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this agreement. a)Termination by Owner: The Owner may terminate this Agreement for cause in whole or in part, for the failure of the Consultant to:

1. Perform the services within the time specified in this contract or by Owner approved extension;

2. Make adequate progress so as to endanger satisfactory performance of the Project; or

3. Fulfill the obligations of the Agreement that are essential to the completion of the Project.

Upon receipt of the notice of termination, the Consultant must immediately discontinue all services affected unless the notice directs otherwise. Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete.

Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

If, after finalization of the termination action, the Owner determines the Consultant was not in default of the Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the Owner issued the termination for the convenience of the Owner.
b)Termination by Consultant: The Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause in whole or in part, if the Owner:

1. Defaults on its obligations under this Agreement;

2. Fails to make payment to the Consultant in accordance with the terms of this Agreement;

Page 65 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 18

3. Suspends the project for more than [180] days due to reasons beyond the control of the Consultant.

Upon receipt of a notice of termination from the Consultant, Owner agrees to cooperate with Consultant for the purpose of terminating the agreement or portion thereof, by mutual consent. If Owner and Consultant cannot reach mutual agreement on the termination settlement, the Consultant may, without prejudice to any rights and remedies it may have, proceed with terminating all or parts of this Agreement based upon the Owner’s breach of the contract.

In the event of termination due to Owner breach, the Consultant is entitled to invoice Owner and to receive full payment for all services performed or furnished in accordance with this Agreement and all justified reimbursable expenses incurred by the Consultant through the effective date of termination action. Owner agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

C 1 8 T R A D E R E S T R I C T I O N C E R T I F I C A T I O N

S O U R C E
49 USC § 50104
49 CFR Part 30
By submission of an offer, the Offeror certifies that with respect to this solicitation and any resultant contract, the Offeror –
1) is not owned or controlled by one or more citizens of a foreign country included in the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR);
2) has not knowingly entered into any contract or subcontract for this project with a person that is a citizen or national of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the USTR; and
3) has not entered into any subcontract for any product to be used on the Federal project that is produced in a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR.

This certification concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States of America and the making of a false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may render the maker subject to prosecution under Title 18 USC § 1001.

The Offeror/Contractor must provide immediate written notice to the Owner if the Offeror/Contractor learns that its certification or that of a subcontractor was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The Contractor must require subcontractors provide immediate written notice to the Contractor if at any time it learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

Unless the restrictions of this clause are waived by the Secretary of Transportation in accordance with 49 CFR § 30.17, no contract shall be awarded to an Offeror or subcontractor:
1) who is owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR; or

Page 66 of 474 ends

Guidelines for Contract Provisions for Obligated Sponsors and Airport Improvement Program Projects Issued on January 20, 2023 Page 19
2) whose subcontractors are owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country on such USTR list; or
3) who incorporates in the public works project any product of a foreign country on such USTR list.

Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by this provision. The knowledge and information of a contractor is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

The Offeror agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification without modification in all lower tier subcontracts. The Contractor may rely on the certification of a prospective subcontractor that it is not a firm from a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by USTR, unless the Offeror has knowledge that the certification is erroneous.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making an award. If it is later determined that the Contractor or subcontractor knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may direct through the Owner cancellation of the contract or subcontract for default at no cost to the Owner or the FAA.

C 1 9 V E T E R A N ’ S P R E F E R E N C E

S O U R C E
49 USC § 47112(c)
In the employment of labor (excluding executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), the Contractor and all sub-tier contractors must give preference to covered veterans as defined within Title 49 United States Code Section 47112. Covered veterans include Vietnam-era veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns (as defined by 15 USC § 632) owned and controlled by disabled veterans. This preference only applies when there are covered veterans readily available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.

C 2 0 D O M E S T I C P R E F E R E N C E S F O R P R O C U R E M E N T S

S O U R C E
2 CFR § 200.322
2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II(L)

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DOMESTIC PREFERENCES FOR PROCUREMENTS The Bidder or Offeror certifies by signing and submitting this bid or proposal that, to the greatest extent practicable, the Bidder or Offeror has provided a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including, but not limited to, iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products) in compliance with 2 CFR § 200.322.

Page 67 of 474 ends

BRANDLEY

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SUBMITTED FOR: ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES

ARCHITECTURAL
& ENGINEERING SERVICES
RFQ NUMBER 22-05
RFQ #22-05 AIRPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES AT THE HANFORD MUNICIPAL SUBMITTED FOR: ARCHITECTUAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES | DATE OF SUBMISSION: Nov. 4, 2022

Page 68 of 474 ends

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING, INC.

November 4, 2022
City Clerk
319 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Subject: City of Hanford – Request for Statement of Qualifications – RFQ #22-05 Professional Planning, Architectural, and Design/Engineering Services Airport Development Projects – Hanford Municipal Airport Architectural/Engineering
Dear Sir/Madam:

In response to your Request for Qualifications RFQ #22-05 for Professional Planning, Architectural, and Design/Engineering Services associated with Airport Development Projects for the Hanford Municipal Airport, we are delighted to have the opportunity to work with the City of Hanford on the development of the Hanford Municipal Airport.

Brandley Engineering, Inc., located solely in Loomis, California, is a consulting airport engineering and planning office with one hundred percent of our business devoted to airport grant administration, planning, design, engineering, and construction management services for all types of airport development projects.

We have been providing these services for the past 69 years. The upcoming projects at the Hanford Municipal Airport fit within our primary area of focus and expertise.

Melissa Brandley will be the project manager on all Hanford Municipal Airport projects. She will be available at all times to coordinate design projects. Damon Brandley and Tom Steinkamp will also be available to provide support engineering design services when needed.

The office of Brandley Engineering specializes in airport engineering, environmental, planning, and construction management services for all types of airport projects. Our office has completed numerous airport engineering design projects at many airports throughout Northern and Central California, including Visalia Municipal Airport, Madera Municipal Airport, Chowchilla Municipal Airport, Tracy Municipal Airport, and Sacramento International Airport.

Brandley Engineering’s overall aviation experience will ensure that your projects will be completed according to FAA Standards and criteria in a timely and cost-effective manner. Our staff has an excellent and extensive knowledge of FAA procedures and regulations. This is accentuated by a close working relationship with the Northern California District Office of the FAA.

By submission of this Statement of Qualifications, Brandley Engineering acknowledges receipt of Addendum No. 1 to SOQ_F-2022-0002, on October 17, 2022.

Page 69 of 474 ends

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING, INC.

We are excited to provide professional architectural/engineering services for the development of the Hanford Municipal Airport and look forward to working with City and Airport staff.

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact: Melissa Brandley, P.E., (916) 316- 1415, [email protected].

Very truly yours,
Melissa S. Brandley, P.E.

Corporate Secretary/CFO

Page 70 of 474 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CITY OF HANFORD
RFQ NO. 22-05

ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES

AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

STATEMENT OF

QUALIFICATIONS
Section A General Information A-1
Section B Staff Qualifications B-1
Section C Related Experience C-1
Section D Conflict of Interest D-1
Section E Optional Statements E-1
E1 Pavement Maintenance E-1
Management Plan (PMMP) –
Project Approach
E2 Engineering Design E-3
– Project Approach
E3 Demonstrated Ability to E-5
Respond Quickly
E4 Additional Qualifications E-6
Attachment 1 Certificates/Affidavits

Page 71 of 474 ends

A-1
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

GENERAL INFORMATION

SECTION A
FIRM: Brandley Engineering, Inc.
6125 King Road, Suite 201
Loomis, California 95650
Telephone: (916) 652-4725
Fax: (916) 652-9029
CONTACT: Melissa S. Brandley, P.E. 71139
Mobile: (916) 316-1415
TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: S Corporation
FEDERAL TAX ID: Will be submitted as part of the contract award process.

HANFORD TAX CERT NO.: We certify we will obtain a City of Hanford Business Tax Certificate prior to commencing work.

SURETY INFORMATION: See attached Certificate of Insurance REFERENCES/REFERRALS Ms. Katherine Bales, Former Airport Superintendent, Visalia Municipal Airport, Current Assistant Airport Manager, Napa County Airport, 2030 Airport Road, Napa, California 94558, 707-299-1694, [email protected]
Ms. Paula Jessup, Airport Manager, Tracy Municipal Airport, 5749 S. Tracy Boulevard, Tracy, California 95377, 209-831-6215, [email protected] Mr. Daniel Seldon, Senior Project Manager, UC Davis Design and Construction Management, TAPS Building, University of California Davis, California 95616, 530-219- 7767, [email protected]
Mr. Kevin Edwards, Airport Manager, Nevada County Airport, 13083 John Bauer Avenue, Grass Valley, California 95945, 530-273-3374, [email protected]

Page 72 of 474 ends

A-2
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

Page 73 of 474 ends

B-1
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

STAFF QUALIFICATIONS

SECTION B
Brandley Engineering has one of the most unique and highly qualified design teams. As a family business, our team consists of the second generation of Brandley Engineering, Melissa Brandley and Damon Brandley. Both Melissa and Damon Brandley planned on continuing the Brandley Engineering legacy from an early age and began working for the company as teenagers. As a result, our design team’s background, education, and abilities have been carefully planned to perfectly complement each other to create the best possible team. Our approach to building a highly qualified design team centers on advanced education and knowledge, as these are the key ingredients to solving very difficult and complicated engineering challenges. All project managers have advanced master’s degrees in Civil Engineering and extensive airport planning and engineering experience.

Melissa Brandley’s master’s degree in geotechnical engineering perfectly complements Damon Brandley’s master’s degree in pavements and materials. This, combined with their many years under the guidance of Reinard W.

Brandley with his extensive knowledge and 69 years of experience in the airport engineering field, creates the ideal team to solve any engineering design challenge. Melissa and Damon Brandley are supported by a veteran team of five additional engineers, drafters and support staff with extensive experience in airport planning and design. Every employee of Brandley Engineering has spent their entire aviation career with our firm.

The project staffing for the office of Brandley Engineering has been structured to utilize experienced project managers, engineers, technicians, and administrative personnel. Project staffing workload in our office is largely controlled by limiting the number and type of projects to which we submit proposals and by minor adjustments to staffing. We have reserved space in our workload to provide the time and attention required for the projects anticipated at Hanford Municipal Airport over the next few years.

All members of the Brandley Engineering staff can begin work immediately following contract execution as needed on Hanford Municipal Airport projects. Brandley Engineering schedules the work as soon as we receive authorization to proceed on a project and holds weekly meetings to ensure all projects are being completed on time and within budget.

All members of the Brandley Engineering team have extensive knowledge of FAA regulations, policies, and procedures, including:
 Airport Capital Improvement Plans (ACIP)
 Airport Improvement Program (AIP) FAA grant funding
 Pavement Maintenance Management Plans (PMMP)
 Environmental processes
 Review process of plans and specifications
 Bidding process
 Contract award process
 Project/grant closeout.

This knowledge qualifies our office to provide liaison with the FAA on behalf of Airports at any district or regional office. All staff members are kept up to date on all FAA Advisory Circulars and Design Guidelines.

Team members receive weekly email updates on FAA regulations, policies, and procedures.

The basic design of a project can generally be prepared by any qualified engineer, but it is the details incorporated in the design that can make the difference between a short-lived, high-maintenance project and a long-life, low- maintenance project. Knowledge required to develop and incorporate the design details into a set of plans and specifications is obtained by advanced graduate schooling, experience, and research. All members of the Brandley Management Team have completed advanced graduate schooling with master’s degrees. This will ensure all projects at Hanford Municipal Airport will be properly designed and result in long-life, low-maintenance projects.

All members of Brandley
Engineering team have
extensive knowledge of FAA
procedures.

Page 74 of 474 ends

B-2
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

SUBCONSULTANTS
The following subconsultants will supplement the Brandley Engineering staff for specialty services.  Brandley Engineering designs all airfield lighting and signage in-house. For airport power and electrical systems and electric automobile and aircraft charging stations, we utilize the services of Gino Romano, P.E. of Peters Engineering Company. Electrical systems play an important role in modern airport facilities, and Gino brings his experience and knowledge to each assignment as he establishes appropriate technologies and cost-effective solutions for the project at hand. Over the last few years, Gino has been a valuable asset to the Brandley Engineering team on various projects at Stockton Metropolitan Airport, Lincoln Regional Airport, Visalia Municipal Airport, Chowchilla Municipal Airport and University Airport.  For the architectural design of the proposed Pilot and Crew lounge and/or reception area, Brandley Engineering will team with NORR to provide architectural design services. We will work principally with Matthew Shigihara, Project Manager/Principal Architect, and Mike Novak, Associate/Studio Manager. Matthew has over 35 years of experience in managing complex projects to successful completion. He has led the planning, design, and management of terminal work at Sacramento International Airport, terminal work at Los Angeles World Airports, U.S. Customs Inspection Facility at Ontario International Airport, and the International Terminal Building at Honolulu International Airport.
 Topographic surveys will be provided by ESP Surveying, Inc., operating out of Fresno, California. Frank Mungia will serve as Survey Manager and has over thirty-seven years of project planning, design, surveying, engineering, construction, and management in private and public sectors. He is experienced in construction, boundary, topographic, elevation certificates and aerial photography surveying. He has extensive experience in supervision of field crews, billing review, contractor oversight, and meetings with governmental agencies.

Also he has been involved in various survey tasks, which include roadways, highways, bridges, subdivisions, airports, schools, railroads, photogrammetric, GPS surveying, and GIS projects.  Most environmental Cat Ex documents are conducted under the Engineering/Architecture contract. For these environmental services, Brandley Engineering will team with Jim Wallace of Wallace Environmental Consulting. Mr. Wallace is an expert in the National Environmental Policy Act and the supporting special purpose laws and has over 40-years of experience as an environmental and resource consultant including the last 24 years as an environmental compliance and resource manager on federally obligated airports preparing over 250 NEPA and CEQA compliance documents for over 30 airports in Northern California. Mr. Wallace has demonstrated his dedication to providing direct and clear environmental consulting and is committed to the completion of all NEPA and CEQA compliance documents.

Page 75 of 474 ends

B-3
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 Work performed for the City of Hanford on Hanford Municipal Airport projects will be managed by Melissa Brandley, P.E. The organizational chart presented below shows the organizational structure that is proposed to implement Hanford Municipal Airport engineering/architecture projects.

Organization Chart - INSERT
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

PROJECT MANAGER

DESIGN MANAGER

GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Damon Brandley, P.E.

DESIGN ENGINEER

PAVEMENT EVALUATION AND
DESIGN

FUEL TANK & ISLAND DESIGN

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Wallace Environmental
Jim Wallace

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Peters Engineering
Gino Romano, P.E.

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS
ESP Surveying
Frank Mungia

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
NORR
Mike Novak

PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Brandley Engineering
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

Damon Brandley, P.E.

ENGINEERING DESIGN
Brandley Engineering
Melissa Brandley, P.E.

Tom Steinkamp, E.I.T.

ENGINEERING DESIGN

SUPPORT
Brandley Engineering
Kevin Curry, P.E.

David Baltazar, E.I.T.

Alaire Wells

Page 76 of 474 ends

B-4
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 The experience of each key staff member in the Brandley Engineering Team is presented in the resumes below describing education, credentials, related experience, and proposed roles for the contract.

Page 77 of 474 ends

B-5
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 MELISSA S. BRANDLEY, P.E.,

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING

PROJECT MANAGER/PROJECT ENGINEER
Melissa Brandley has been on staff since 2004 and will be Project Manager/Project Engineer and the main point of contact for Hanford Municipal Airport projects. Ms.

Brandley is a major partner in Brandley Engineering and part of the second generation of Brandley Engineering. She is a registered Civil Engineer in the State of California (C 71139). Ms. Brandley received bachelor’s & master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University with an emphasis in Geotechnical Engineering.

Melissa Brandley worked for Brandley Engineering for six summers during high school and college learning the basics of airport design and complying with FAA design standards and advisory circulars. She has been a full-time staff member and major partner in Brandley Engineering since completing her university studies in 2004. She is experienced in the planning and design of airfield facilities.

Melissa Brandley’s vast airport design experience covers every facet of airport engineering including designs of runways, taxiways, aprons, hangar developments, roads, parking lots, drainage systems, lighting systems, navigational aids and fencing. Her graduate school studies in Geotechnical Engineering ensures that each design incorporates a detailed geotechnical evaluation of local soil conditions. This experience coupled with extensive knowledge of FAA standards and advisory circulars results in a design that meets all FAA standards and addresses unique local conditions and needs of the airport.

Over the past five years Melissa has performed engineering design and construction management for the reconstruction of aircraft parking apron and the construction of tee hangars and corporate hangar at Visalia Municipal Airport, the reconstruction of the general aviation apron and tee hangar taxilanes at Tracy Municipal Airport, the crack seal of airfield pavements at the Visalia Municipal Airport and Oroville Municipal Airport and the Airfield Drainage Improvements at Madera Municipal Airport. She recently completed the engineering design of the reconstruction of the runway at Chowchilla Municipal Airport and is currently working on the engineering design of the site for a new ARFF/Snow Removal Facility at Mammoth Yosemite Airport.

Melissa has been actively involved in airport design and construction control for seven summers while attending school and a full time project manager for Brandley Engineering since 2004. She has the ability to delegate responsibilities for each project including drafting of plans, preparation of specifications and reports, and preparation of estimates. The staff of Brandley Engineering respect her capabilities and is ready and willing to assist her on all projects.

Education
B.S., Civil Engineering, Texas A & M University, 2003
M.E., Civil Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering, Texas A & M University, 2004

REGISTRATION
California Professional Engineer, C 71139

EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which Melissa has been Project Manager/Project Engineer for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 Madera Municipal Airport – Airfield Drainage Improvements – 2022  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – ARFF/Snow Removal Facility – Site Work – 2022  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of Runway 12-30 and Airfield Electrical – 2021-22  Colusa County Airport – Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Runway 13-31 including changing Runway Identification Numbers – 2021

Page 78 of 474 ends

B-6
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022  Visalia Municipal Airport – Seal Cracks and Remark Airfield Pavements - 2020  Visalia Municipal Airport – Upgrade Airfield Guidance Signs - 2019  Oroville Municipal Airport – Construct Taxiway K – 2018  Tracy Municipal Airport – Tee Hangar Taxilanes – 2018  Visalia Municipal Airport – Aircraft Hangar Buildings – 2018-19  Tracy Municipal Airport – New 2-box PAPI Runway 30, Power Upgrades for PAPIs Runways 12, 8, and 26, Replace AWOS – 2017
 Visalia Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Apron A2 – 2017  Tracy Municipal Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation Tie Down Apron - 2017  Madera Municipal Airport – Reconstruct General Aviation Apron Phase 2 – 2016  Tracy Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Runways and Taxiways – 2015  Stockton Metropolitan Airport – Rehabilitate R/W and T/W Lights and Signs – 2014  Watsonville Municipal Airport – Reconstruct T/W C and GA Apron Phase 1 – 2014  Oroville Municipal Airport – North Side Apron Rehabilitation – 2013  Visalia Municipal Airport – East Side Drainage Upgrade – 2012  Rogers Field, Chester, California – Reconstruct Tee Hangar Taxilanes – 2012  Tulelake Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of Aircraft Parking Apron - 2012  Madera Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of General Aviation Apron Phase 1 - 2012  Chico Municipal Airport – Rehabilitation of Aircraft Parking Apron (5 phases) – 2007 thru 2010  Lake Tahoe Airport – Terminal Apron Reconstruction – 2009 through 2010  Fresno Chandler Executive Airport – Construct North Parallel Taxiway – 2009  Visalia Municipal Airport – Construction of South Side Taxiway - 2006

Page 79 of 474 ends

B-7
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 DAMON BRANDLEY, P.E.,

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING

AIRPORT PLANNER
Damon Brandley has been on staff since 2002 and will work with Melissa as needed on project management and project engineering, for Hanford Municipal Airport projects. Mr.

Brandley is a major partner in Brandley Engineering and part of the second generation of Brandley Engineering. He is a registered Civil Engineer in the State of California (C 66558).

Damon has been actively involved in airport and airfield pavement design and construction control for nine summers while attending school and full time since 2002. He has completed a Research Assistantship at the University of Illinois in Champaign/Urbana while completing his master’s degree. This research was conducted in conjunction with the FAA’s Center of Excellence in Airport Pavement Research. His work as a Research Assistant included airfield pavement design and testing, Super Pave asphalt mix designs, and various other research projects.

He is experienced in the planning and design of runways, taxiways, aprons, and roads, including paving, grading, drainage, lighting, utilities, etc. He has conducted construction management, testing, and inspection on many airports since 2002.

Damon has been lead engineer for Pavement Evaluation Studies over the past 13 years. He has been involved in all aspects of these studies including soil testing, pavement testing, pavement inspections, calculation of the remaining life of the pavements under forecast traffic, and the development of the Pavement Management Maintenance Plans (PMMP) for more than 30 airports. Damon is responsible for all pavement section designs and pavement material submittal reviews for Brandley Engineering projects. Mr.

Brandley’s master’s degree and experience in the evaluation of airfield pavements is invaluable to our clients in the design and construction management of pavement rehabilitation, reconstruction, and/or maintenance projects.

Damon is the lead engineer on all new fuel tank and fuel island designs for Brandley Engineering and recently completed new fueling projects at Lincoln Regional Airport and Nervino Airport in Beckwourth, California.

Mr. Brandley’s experience in the evaluation of airfield pavements is invaluable to our clients in the design and construction management of pavement rehabilitation, reconstruction, and/or maintenance projects.

EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering, Texas A & M University, 2000
M.S., Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering, University of Illinois, 2001

REGISTRATION
California Professional Engineer, C 66558

CONTINUING EDUCATION
AAAE GIS Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas

EXPERIENCE
Damon Brandley has conducted engineering design, construction management, testing, and inspection on several airports since 2002 for Brandley Engineering. Damon is responsible for all Pavement Maintenance Management Plans prepared for Brandley Engineering. Representative projects on which Damon was Project Manager/Engineer for Brandley Engineering include the following:
 University Airport, Davis, California – Runway 17-35 Reconstruction and Widening, Exit Pavements, and Airfield Lighting – 2022
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Existing Runway 2-20 including Airfield Electrical - 2022  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A West – 2021

Page 80 of 474 ends

B-8
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct East General Aviation Apron – 2020  Nervino Airport, Beckwourth, California – Fuel Farm Expansion – 2020  Lincoln Regional Airport – New Fuel Farm – 2019
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Executive Hangar Development - 2018  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxilane R - 2018  Sacramento Executive Airport – Removal of Runway 16-34 - 2017  Tahoe City Helipad - 2017
 Sacramento International Airport – Reconstruction of Taxiway D – 2016  Truckee Tahoe Airport - Reconstruct Taxiway A - 2015  Chico Municipal Airport - Reconstruct Aircraft Parking Apron - 2015  Truckee Tahoe Airport - Reconstruct Apron A4 - 2015
 Truckee Tahoe Airport - 2014 Airfield Maintenance Projects  Lake Tahoe Airport - Reconstruction of General Aviation Apron – 2013-14  Truckee Tahoe Airport – 2013 Airfield Maintenance Projects  Tahoe City Helipad Feasibility - 2012
 Chico Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway H - 2011  Truckee Tahoe Airport - Runway 10-28 Rehabilitation and 2011 & 2012 Pavement Maintenance Projects – 2011-12
 Oroville Municipal Airport - Crack Seal Pavements, Airfield Guidance Signs - 2011  Lake Tahoe Airport – Infield Grading – 2010
 Lake Tahoe Airport – Terminal Apron Reconstruction - 2009  Fresno Chandler Executive Airport – Construct Taxiway H - 2009  Placerville Airport – Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Airfield Pavements - 2009  Plumas County Airports – Obstruction Removal - 2009
 Stockton Metropolitan Airport – Reconstruct GA Apron and Tee Hangar T/W – 2008  Lake Tahoe Airport – Reconstruction of Runway 18-36 – 2008  Sacramento International Airport – Terminal “A” East Apron Expansion – 2007 Over the past several years Damon Brandley has prepared PMMPs for the following airports:

Colusa County Airport, Oroville Municipal Airport, 3 Plumas County Airports – 2021 (in progress)  Watsonville Municipal Airport - 2021
 Nevada County Airport - 2021
 Truckee Tahoe Airport - 2021
 Chowchilla Municipal Airport (PCI) – 2018
 Alturas Municipal Airport – 2017
 Lake Tahoe Airport – 2017
 Chico Municipal Airport – 2017
 Fresno Chandler Executive Airport – PCI Update - 2016  Stockton Metropolitan Airport - 2016
 Sacramento County Airports – Sacramento International, Sacramento Mather, and Sacramento Executive – 2015-16
 Madera Municipal Airport – 2014
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – 2014
 Tracy Municipal Airport – 2013
 Truckee Tahoe Airport -Truckee, California - 2011

Page 81 of 474 ends

B-9
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 THOMAS A. STEINKAMP, E.I.T.

PROJECT ENGINEER
Tom Steinkamp has been on staff since 1984 and will serve on the design team for Hanford Municipal Airport projects.

Mr. Steinkamp brings a dynamic engineering background to this firm with over 48 years of experience in engineering design. This experience began with a mechanical engineering degree and continued with 10 years of active employment with a civil engineering consulting/materials testing firm as a project designer and materials testing technician.

Mr. Steinkamp has been actively involved in airport and airfield pavement design and construction control on airports in the Western United States since 1984. He has over 38 years of progressive field and office experience in design and management of airfield projects in our office. He is experienced in the design of runways, taxiways, aprons, and roads, including paving, grading, drainage, lighting, utilities, etc.

Since he began working for Brandley Engineering in 1984, Mr. Steinkamp has developed a thorough knowledge of the principles and practices of civil and airport engineering and construction management with knowledge of and experience with FAA regulations, requirements, practices, design and planning criteria and advisory circulars.

Tom Steinkamp will serve on the design team for Hanford Municipal Airport projects. He recently worked with Melissa Brandley on the engineering design of the reconstruction of the runway at Chowchilla Municipal Airport. He will be available as needed for Hanford Municipal Airport projects.

EDUCATION
B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, 1979

EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which Tom was Project Engineer for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Existing Runway 2-20 including Airfield Electrical - 2022  Chowchilla Municipal Airport - Rehabilitation of Runway 12-30 and Airfield Electrical – 2021-22  Nevada County Airport - Crack Seal Taxiway A, Crack Seal and Slurry Seal Ramp 2, Crack Seal Ramps 1 and 5 - 2021
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Reconstruct Town Hangar Taxilane, Slurry Seal Taxiways, Upgrade Airfield Guidance Signs – 2020
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Relocate Wind Cone and Segmented Circle – 2019  Oroville Municipal Airport – Construct Taxiway K – 2018-19  Watsonville Municipal Airport – Airfield Guidance Sign Upgrade – 2018  Watsonville Municipal Airport – 2-box PAPIs Runways 2 and 20 – 2017  Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Wildlife/Security Fence - 2017  Bryant Field – Stock Drive Realignment - 2016
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Apron A2 Expansion, Taxiway E Removal, Reconstruct South Jet Apron – 2015-16
 Oroville Municipal Airport – Grade RSA and Improve Drainage - 2015  Tracy Municipal Airport - Reconstruct Airfield Pavements - 2014  Bryant Field - Reconstruct Runway 16-34 and Taxiway A – 2012  Visalia Municipal Airport – Southwest Side Development – 2011  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Runway 10-28 Rehabilitation/Pavement Maintenance Projects – 2011-12  Madera Municipal Airport – Construct General Aviation Apron and Access Taxiway - 2010  Madera Municipal Airport – Install New Taxiway Edge Lights and REIL – 2010

Page 82 of 474 ends

B-10
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 DAVID BALTAZAR, E.I.T.

DESIGN ENGINEER
David Baltazar has been involved in airport design and airfield pavement testing and inspection on airports in the Western United States since 2005. He has 17 years of progressive field and laboratory experience in testing and inspection of airfield projects in our office. He is experienced in the design and inspection of runways, taxiways, aprons, and roads, including paving, grading, drainage, lighting, utilities, etc.

Mr. Baltazar has developed and applied his skills for designing and inspecting airport construction projects.

From the design phase to the finished construction he treats each project with respect and professionalism in the Airport’s interests, which results in a quality project that will outperform and outlast expectations.

As an Engineer David has honed and utilized his proficiency in AutoCAD Civil 3D 2021 to design and draft detail-oriented construction plans and airport layout plans. He has been the lead designer on airfield pavement crack and joint seal projects for Lincoln and Tulelake Airports and pavement reconstruction projects for Rogers Field and Truckee-Tahoe Airport. He is capable of providing design and support wherever there is a need to maintain continuity throughout Brandley Engineering’s design process. While working on many design jobs he has become proficient in quantity takeoffs and engineering estimates that deliver accuracy and clarity for each design project. During his time at Brandley Engineering he has helped create a system to provide a reprographic and digital maintenance that creates a smooth and timely delivery of plans when needed.

Mr. Baltazar will serve on the design staff for the Hanford Municipal Airport projects. He will devote the time required to complete the project within the time agreed.

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, California State University, Sacramento 2007

EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which David served on the design team for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 University Airport - Davis, California - Runway 17-35 Reconstruction and Widening, Exit Pavements, and Airfield Lighting – 2022
 Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A West – 2021  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Reconstruct Runway 11-29 East Blast Pad, Construct Medical Services Apron, Construct New Wash Rack – 2020
 Watsonville Municipal Airport – Seal Cracks, Seal Coat, and Remark Runway 2-20 and Associated Taxiways - 2019
 Visalia Municipal Airport – Hangar Development – Building and Site – 2017-18  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Crack Seal, Slurry Seal, and Remark Taxiway A and Aircraft Parking Apron – 2018
 Madera Municipal Airport – Crack Seal All Airfield Pavements - 2017  Lake Tahoe Airport – General Aviation Reconstruction Phase 4 – 2017  Visalia Municipal Airport – Hangar Development - Building and Site - 2017  Tulelake Municipal Airport – Saw and Seal Joints Runway 11-29 - 2016  Lincoln Regional Airport – Crack Seal Airfield Pavements - 2015  Lake Tahoe Airport – Taxiway Joint Seal, Remarking - 2014  Tracy Municipal Airport - Reconstruction of Airfield Pavements – 2013-14  Oroville Municipal Airport - North Side Apron Rehabilitation – 2013  Truckee Tahoe Airport - Runway 10-20 Rehabilitation and Airfield Maintenance Projects – 2011-12  Plumas County Airports – Reseal Pavement Joints and Paint Airfield Marking, AWOS III, Replace Rotating Beacon, New PAPI – 2011
 Rogers Field – Tee Hangar Taxiway Rehabilitation – 2011  Lake Tahoe Airport – Terminal Ramp Reconstruction - 2010

Page 83 of 474 ends

B-11
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 KEVIN CURREY, P.E.

DESIGN ENGINEER
Mr. Currey has over 18 years’ experience in design and engineering of civil infrastructure projects. In addition to airport-related projects, his professional experience includes large-scale residential, commercial, and mixed use land development; design of compensatory wetlands and environmental mitigation projects; drainage master plans; and public works planning, scoping, and engineering design. He is also experienced in land planning, surveying, and project scheduling.

Before joining the Brandley Engineering team in 2015, he provided AutoCAD design and training services to engineering firms.

Mr. Currey is an expert AutoCAD Civil 3D user, mentor, and trainer. He has helped companies successfully implement Civil 3D and trained employees to become proficient in using the software through all aspects of the design process. He also managed their AutoCAD and network infrastructure. His software competencies include AutoCAD Civil 3D, Autodesk Subassembly Composer and Part Builder for Civil 3D, Autodesk Storm & Sanitary Analysis, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Project, and Microsoft Windows networking administration.

Mr. Currey is very knowledgeable in airport design. He is well-versed in FAA design guidelines, and has used AutoCAD to model aircraft turning movements to design fillets that meet new FAA taxiway fillet design standards to meet airport operators’ unique operational needs. He has been the project designer for the Sacramento International Airport East Taxiways Improvements, Gansner Field Runway 7-25 Reconstruction, Truckee Tahoe Airport Taxiway A Reconstruction, and Chico Municipal Airport Taxiway A Reconstruction.

Mr. Currey will serve on the design staff for the Hanford Municipal Airport projects. He will devote the time required to complete the project within the time agreed.

EDUCATION
Completed Undergraduate Major Coursework in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, 2012

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
California Professional Engineer, C 90627

EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which Kevin served on the design team for Brandley Engineering are as follows:
 Madera Municipal Airport – Airfield Drainage Improvements - 2022  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Runway 12-30 – 2021-22  University Airport, Davis, California - Runway 17-35 Reconstruction and Widening, Exit Pavements, and Airfield Lighting – 2021-22
 Mammoth Yosemite Airport – Security Gates and Terminal Area Fence – 2020  Visalia Municipal Airport – Aircraft Hangar Buildings - 2019  Chico Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Taxiway A – 2017-2018  Bryant Field Airport – Obstruction Evaluation – 2016
 Sacramento International Airport – East Taxiways Improvements – 2015-16  Gansner Field Airport – Runway 7-25 Reconstruction – 2015-16  Madera Municipal Airport – Apron Reconstruction – 2016  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Jet Apron Reconstruction – 2015-16  Alturas Municipal Airport – Helicopter Apron – 2016
 Truckee Tahoe Airport District – Tahoe City Helipad – 2015  Truckee Tahoe Airport – Taxiway A Reconstruction – 2015  McClellan Airfield – Airfield Remarking Plan – 2015
 Tracy Municipal Airport – Runway 12-30 & Taxiway B Reconstruction - 2015  Oroville Municipal Airport - Drainage and Safety Area Improvements - 2015

Page 84 of 474 ends

B-12
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

ALAIRE WELLS

PROJECTS/GRANTS ADMINISTRATOR
Alaire Wells has been a member of the Brandley Engineering team since 1979. She is involved in the project administration and grants administration for all clients.

EDUCATION
AA, American River College, 1979

BACKGROUND
Alaire has been working for Brandley Engineering since 1979. In that time she has become very knowledgeable in all steps required to complete a project beginning with grant applications (FAA and State), preparation of specifications and reports, bidding process, award process, construction process including preparation of weekly reports, progress payments, FAA drawdown requests, and maintaining all records of construction, and the final closeout process including final report, final drawdown requests, and requests to FAA for closeout of the grant. She has a thorough knowledge of and experience with FAA regulations, requirements, practices, and advisory circulars.

EXPERIENCE
Ms. Wells has been actively involved in airport project and grant administration for Brandley Engineering since 1979. She has over 43 years of working with airports and the FAA to ensure that all projects meet FAA deadlines and are in compliance with FAA requirements and that information required by the FAA is assembled and delivered as required. All clients’ requests are answered in a timely and accurate manner.

Examples of services Alaire performs for our clients include:
 Assisting Airport and Engineer in preparation of annual Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP).
 Assisting Airport and Engineer in preparation of grant applications.  Keeping track of deadlines and budgets.
 Preparation of Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP) narrative.  Assembly of specifications and reports for Project/Design Engineer’s review.  Preparation and submittal of Invitation for Bids to Airport for their use in advertising projects.  When bids have been received, preparation of abstract of bids and application documents required for the FAA grant based on bids.
 During construction, maintenance of all records of construction.  Assisting Airport in preparation of reimbursement requests for amounts reimbursable from grant projects (FAA Form 271).
 Assembly of final engineer’s report for Resident Engineer’s review.  Obtain release of liens and other required final close-out documents from contractors.  Assisting Airport in preparation of final drawdown request, the Federal Financial Report (FAA Form 425), and other documents the airport requires for closing out the FAA grant.

Page 85 of 474 ends

B-13
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

EDUCATION
Graduate B.S. – Electrical Engineering
California State University, Chico, 1989

REGISTRATION
California E 17247 2004

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION
- IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

EXPERIENCE
Over 30 years of experience in the electrical engineering industry.

Gino has worked in the ﬁeld of design and design/ build since 1991. He joined Peters Engineering in 2008 and
during this time he has completed several successful
projects encompassing similar scopes at airports and
other facilities.

Below is a brief summary of relevant projects:
 Stockton Airport Lighting Power Survey
 Lincoln Airport Fueling Station
 Visalia Airport Hangar Building
 Chowchilla Beacon
 Chowchilla Runway Lighting Rehab
 UCD University Airport Beacon Tower
 UCD University Airpor t New Electrical Vault
 UCD Mondavi Center Emergency Generator
 VERIZON Mega Data Center Emergency Generator
 Comcast Generator and Rectifier
 Sunguard Data Center Generator
GINO ROMANO, P.E., VICE PRESIDENT AND MECHANICL ENGINEER

Page 86 of 474 ends

B-14
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 *Performed with a previous affiliation.

Matthew Shigihara
AIA, LEED® AP
Project Manager /Principal Architect
Matthew has over 35 years of experience in managing complex projects to successful completion. In addition to managing client relations, Matthew leads the planning, design and management of many public and private sector projects.

His work ranges from designing small scale intricately detailed spaces to large master planned developments. His depth of project experience and knowledge of industry trends provides projects with designs that have a lasting and a sustainable impact.

EDUCATION
University Of Washington
Seattle, WA
• Master of Architecture
• Bachelor of Architecture

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
• American Institute of Architects (AIA)
• Licensed Architect: CA, NV, AZ, OR, WA, HI
• Professional License State of CA: #C17421
• USGBC, LEED® Accredited Professional

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
NORR Experience
2019 — Present
Industry Experience
37 Years

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Sacramento International Airport (SMF)*
Sacramento, CA
Project Architect
• Terminal B Paradies Concessions for
multiple retail tenants (AOR)
• Terminal B Expansion Sustainability
Services – LEED NC Registered
• Terminal B Phase 3 Modernization
• Terminal A Food Court Modernization
Los Angeles World Airports*
Los Angeles, CA
Project Architect
• Terminal Two Terminal Building
• Terminal Five US Customs Inspection
Facility Upgrade
• Terminal Six 55,000 SF Connector Terminal
• Terminals Seven & Eight Ticket Counter
Upgrade
• International Terminal Operations Offices
for Varig Airlines
• Remote Terminals Remote Transit /
Holdroom Buildings
• Continental Airlines Air Cargo Facility
• Delta Airlines Air Cargo Facility
• Japan Airlines Air Cargo Facility
• Qantas Airways Air Cargo Facility
• United Airlines First Class Lounge
• Continental Airlines President Club
Ontario International Airport*
Ontario, CA
Project Architect
U.S. Customs Inspection Facility in
California. 50,000 SF
Airport Masterplan*
Glendale-Pasadena-Burbank Airport
Project Architect
International Terminal Building*
Honolulu International Airport
Project Architect
Spoils Cover Structures
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E)
Locations Throughout CA
Principal In Charge
The new cover structures provide a design
solution to an ongoing stormwater challenge
at 13 service center locations throughout
Northern CA. The partially enclosed shed
structures are for loose dirt, gravel, and
asphalt material storage. The project also
includes new concrete apron and berm
systems. 2,000 — 5,000 SF, $7M, 2020
A/E On-Call Facilities Retainer Services
Department Of Transportation (Caltrans)
Sacramento, CA
Principal In Charge
As needed A/E building forensic and
assessment services for a wide variety of
building system projects. These included
chiller, boiler, domestic and fire waterlines,
building exhaust, AC dampers, transformer
and subpanels, fire alarm systems, along
with architectural and structural facility
studies, reports, and construction
documentation. Ongoing
Phase I And II
Cache Creek Visitor Center & Trails
Yolo County, CA
Principal
Three-acre site with new visitor center,
parking lot, grading, drainage, well and septic
system improvements.
10,600 SF, $11M, 2023 (est.)

Page 87 of 474 ends

B-15
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 Mike Novak
RA
Associate | Studio Manager
Mike has over 15 years experience in the A/E industry. He brings his diverse architectural knowledge and experience to each of his projects. Mike has designed a wide variety of projects under various delivery methodologies. He leads multidiscipline design teams in developing options that address program challenges. His industry knowledge and experience enables him to ask the questions that pave a path for successful project performance that exceed expectations.

EDUCATION
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, CA
• Bachelor of Architecture

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
• Registered Architect: California — C32976

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
• AIA Member: 2006 — 2017
• AIA Central Valley Emerging Professional
Director: 2013 — 2015
• AIA National - Repositioning Ambassador:
2013 — 2014
• AIA Central Valley Director - Advocacy:
2015 — 2017
• AIA Liaison to Region Builders Trade
Association: 2015 — 2017
• LEED AP: 2005 — 2015
• LEED BD+C: 2015 — 2016
• California Architects License C32976: 2011
to present

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
NORR Experience
2018 — Present
Industry Experience
16 Years

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Auburn Fleet And Warehouse
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E)
Auburn, CA
Project Architect
Phased construction of the new Warehouse
(10,000 SF) and Fleet Maintenance buildings
(12,000 SF), as well as three new structures.

Also full repaving to bring older Service
Center up to modern requirements.

Additional covered storage structures also
included for transformer, pole and spoils
storage. 2022 (est.)
Pacific Energy Center Relocation
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E)
San Ramon, CA
Project Architect
Design for a new tenant improvement in a
10,000 SF warehouse space with exhibit hall,
conference areas, tool check-out, and
classrooms. Systems and energy-focused
project with space as an educational
opportunity for building engineers. The
Pandemic changed approach after CDs
completed. Then provided a new storage-
only TI in a different warehouse space, which
supports virtual classes with tool check-out
services and some hands-on services with
equipment. 2021
Fremont And Richmond Service Centers
Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E)
Fremont & Richmond, CA
Architect
New vehicle wash bay building (PEMB)
within both existing operating service
centers, with recirculating water system.
2,000 SF (ea.), 2021
Redding Service Center
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E)
Redding, CA
Project Architect
Multi-building service center remodel.
40,000 SF, Ongoing
Spoils Covers Phase 2
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E)
13 Locations In California
Project Architect
Industrial metal buildings with storm-water
remediation berm and apron system.

Thirteen locations, each with a unique
design. 3,000 — 7,000 SF, $9M
Weld Shops
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
Multiple Locations, CA
Architect
Foundation up build of a new weld shops for
PG&E maintenance employees. New weld
shops at 5 different service centers to meet
modern exhaust and safety requirements.
600 — 2,400 SF, $1M to $3M, 2020
Bishop Ranch Gas Control Room
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E)
San Ramon, CA
Project Architect
Tenant Improvement control room.
8,000 SF, $2M, 2019
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E)
Locations Throughout CA
Project Architect
• West Sacramento Repro
• Burney Heliport
• PEC Relocation — Building C
• Redding Service Center
• Wheatland Fence Project
• Wheatland Restroom Building
• Bishop Ranch Gas Control Room
• PEC C-Lab — Contract Admin
2018 — Present
Phase I And II
Cache Creek Visitor Center & Trails
Yolo County, CA
Architect
Three-acre site with new visitor center,
parking lot, grading, drainage, well and septic
system improvements.
10,600 SF, $11M, 2023 (est.)

Page 88 of 474 ends

B-16
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

FRANK MUNGIA
SURVEY MANAGER – ESP SURVEYING, INC.

Mr. Mungia has over thirty-seven years of project planning, design, surveying, engineering, construction, and management in private and public sectors. He is experienced in construction, boundary, topographic, elevation certificates and aerial photography surveying. He has extensive experience in supervision of field crews, billing review, contractor oversight, and meetings with governmental agencies. Also he has been involved in various survey tasks, which include roadways, highways, bridges, subdivisions, airports, schools, railroads, photogrammetric, GPS surveying, and GIS projects. Mr. Mungia’s office experience includes record of survey maps, parcel maps, land net surveys, establishing control networks surveys, right of way engineering, subdivisions, ALTA survey maps, topographic surveys, site survey, design survey, lot line adjustments, preparation of legal descriptions and pre-calculations for field crew uses and knowledge with Caltrans Survey Manual and staking methods. Mr. Mungia’s computer software skills include MS Office (Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint, etc.), AutoCAD, GIS, Microstation, Arecview, Tripod Data Systems, Trimble GPS (TGO) and Ashtech GPS.

Mr. Mungia will provide topographic surveys for all Hanford Municipal Airport projects.

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1974 B.S., Architectural California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1974 MBA Executive Program (Attendee), Pepperdine University

REGISTRATION
California Professional Engineer, CE 26317
California Professional Architect, C 12995
ESP SURVEYING, INC. (DIR #1000003735)
ESP Surveying, Inc. is a full-service land surveying firm established in 1991 and based in Fresno, California. ESP has 14 employees. ESP’s surveying division consists of a professional staff with expertise in various aspects of land surveying, which includes boundary, topography, construction and A.L.T.A. surveys.

ESP’s field surveys are performed with satellite GPS equipment, robotic total stations, laptops and advanced electronic instruments, giving them the capability of providing a quick and efficient response to survey requests. State-of-the-art computers, software and communications give office staff the ability to support field operations in an efficient manner. Their techniques allow them to quickly mobilize field crews to any part of the state, setting up a roving field office while “tele-commuting” office staff from the central base of operations in Fresno.

ESP is also certified DBE with the City of Fresno, UDBE with Caltrans, Small Business with the Department of General Services and certified WMBE (Women Minority Business Enterprise) with CPUC. The firm is also self certified for Federal work as a SBE (Small Business Enterprise), WOSB (Woman–Owned Small Business), and a SDB (Small Disadvantage Business).

EXPERIENCE
Representative projects on which surveying services were provided for Brandley Engineering are:
 Madera Municipal Airport – General Aviation Apron Reconstruction  Visalia Municipal Airport – Reconstruct Apron A2
 Visalia Municipal Airport – Construction of Hangars – Site & Buildings  Chowchilla Municipal Airport – Reconstruction of Runway 12-30

Page 89 of 474 ends

B-17
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

JIM WALLACE

WALLACE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING

PRINCIPAL, SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
Jim Wallace has been providing environmental consulting services to airports for over 23 years and will serve as Project Manager and lead EA author for all environmental documentation for Hanford Municipal Airport projects.

EDUCATION
B.A. History, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California Graduate Work in Natural Resource Management, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Mr. Wallace has over 40 years of environmental and natural resources consulting experience including 25 years preparing over 270 NEPA and CEQA compliance documents for over 30 airports in northern California.

Mr. Wallace serves as environmental project manager for airport improvement projects including passenger terminal expansions, runway and taxiway extensions and reconstruction, non-aviation developments, new access roads, runway safety area maintenance in sensitive habitats, parking lots, aircraft aprons and hangar development, wildlife hazards and land use compatibility plans. Nearly all of the airport projects include coordination with multi-disciplinary teams for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Sections 401 and 404 of the US Clean Water Act, US Clean Air Act and US Endangered Species Act and many projects required compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Mr.

Wallace has developed an excellent working relationship with FAA district and regional offices and with airport sponsors.

Mr. Wallace has extensive experience developing technical and policy strategies, testifying at public hearings and negotiating with elected officials and senior staff in U.S. Departments of Transportation, Interior, Agricultural, Commerce and the U.S. EPA. Mr. Wallace is skilled at navigating controversial project issues in public meetings and by providing relevant information and data that lead to sustainable solutions.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
 Tulelake Municipal Airport
• In a controversial project, prepared the NEPA and CEQA compliance documents for the proposed construction of a perimeter fence. The airport and fence are located entirely within the historic boundaries of the World War II-era Tule Lake Segregation Center in Modoc County; the airport is owned by the Modoc Nation. Resolving project conflicts involved detailed cultural resource studies to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act and DOT Section 4(f) analysis. • Prepared NEPA compliance documents for taxiway improvements, access road improvements and runway rehabilitation.
 Lincoln Regional Airport (CA)
• Prepared an Environmental Assessment for the reconstruction of Runway 15/33; applied environmental permitting processes and mitigation measures included in a regional Habitat Conservation Plan. • Prepared NEPA and CEQA compliance documents for Airport Master Plan; projects included new access road, commercial non-aviation development area, box hangar complex and taxiway extension.

Prepared wetland delineation which identified over 30-acres of wetlands and fairy shrimp survey which complicated airport development.
• Prepared Draft Environmental Assessment for a proposed airport business park; project was discontinued, however, we prepared special purpose law studies including a preliminary wetland delineation.
• Prepared NEPA compliance document for runway safety area maintenance which required mitigating impacts to wetland features

Page 90 of 474 ends

B-18
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022  Mammoth Yosemite Airport
• Prepared NEPA and CEQA compliance documents for a new passenger terminal and terminal development area.
• Prepared report requesting that the US Fish and Wildlife Service withdraw the airport from the Bi- State Distinct Population Segment of Greater Sage-Grouse proposed critical habitat. • Prepared multiple NEPA compliance documents for taxiway and aircraft apron reconstruction; new security fence, obstruction lighting; backup electrical power systems and wind-sock relocation. • Prepared Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, Biological Assessment which included an assessment of biological resources within a 5-mile radius of the airport. • Prepared a memorandum regarding Federal environmental reviews and proposed commercial development on approved 1998 ALP.
• Prepared environmental scope of work included in the AIP for airport terminal development.  Lake Tahoe Airport
• Prepared NEPA compliance document to reduce runway width and return unpaved surfaces to the Truckee River Sensitive Environment Zone.
• Prepared NEPA compliance document for new taxiway.
• Conducted assessment of surface water quality impacts associated with year-round spring-fed drainage ditch.
• Prepared Wildlife Hazard Management Plan.
• Prepared Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, Biological Assessment which included an assessment of biological resources within a 5-mile radius of the airport.

Selected Airports for which Mr. Wallace prepared NEPA compliance documents:
 Stockton Metropolitan Airport
 Chico Municipal Airport
 Tracy Municipal Airport
 Colusa County Airport
 Truckee-Tahoe Airport
 Gansner Field, Quincy, California
 ICON Aircraft, Lake Berryessa
 Chowchilla Municipal Airport
 Visalia Municipal Airport
 Placerville Airport
 Healdsburg Municipal Airport
 Napa County Airport
 Weaverville Municipal Airport
 Rogers Field, Chester, California

Page 91 of 474 ends

C-1
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

RELATED EXPERIENCE

SECTION C
The City of Hanford plans several Airport Development projects at the Hanford Municipal Airport over the next several years and is requesting proposals from qualified firms for the Professional Architectural and Design/ Engineering Services associated with these projects. Services required will be architectural/engineering, environmental, and consulting services for the maintenance and improvement of the Hanford Municipal Airport.

Brandley Engineering, Inc., located solely in Loomis, California, is a consulting airport engineering office with one hundred percent of our business devoted to airport grant administration, planning, design, engineering, and construction management services for all types of airport development projects. Reinard W. Brandley, P.E., founded the firm in 1953, and operated the firm under Reinard W. Brandley, Consulting Airport Engineer, until 2020 at which time it was transitioned to a S Corporation, Brandley Engineering Inc., with ownership by Melissa Brandley and Damon Brandley. Brandley Engineering has performed airport grant administration, engineering design, airport planning and construction management services for the past 69 years. The upcoming projects at the Hanford Municipal Airport fit within our primary area of focus and expertise.

Brandley Engineering’s proven engineering excellence has made our quality name known throughout Northern and Central California. By focusing on airport design and planning, we can provide a high-quality plan that will meet all standards and needs of our clients and of the Federal Aviation Administration and of Caltrans Division of Aeronautics.

Our background in geotechnical engineering, pavement evaluation and airport design and engineering provides the experience and ability to make the best use of local materials and to provide a design that will create a long life, lowmaintenance project at reasonable initial cost.

Our close working relationship with the FAA allows us easy access to members of the staff for quick and responsive coordination and reviews of all projects. To further speed up FAA approval, we will review each project with them during design so that final plans will not require detailed time-consuming reviews. This excellent relationship also enables our office to be in the unique position of being made aware of when airport improvement funds are available to our clients. When funds are made available, we act quickly to coordinate with our clients on how to maximize the use of these funds and prepare applications to the FAA for improvement grants.

The experience of Brandley Engineering in working with all branches of the Federal Aviation Administration over the past 69 years has enabled our firm to be very familiar with procedures, regulations, funding, and all other aspects pertaining to airport development. This knowledge has been passed on to all staff members and qualifies our office to provide liaison with the FAA on behalf of Airports at any district or field office. All staff members are kept up to date on all FAA Advisory Circulars and Design Guidelines.

In addition to our experience in working with the FAA, we have also worked closely with Caltrans Division of Aeronautics on the preparation of matching AIP grants and construction projects for airports.

The vast experience of our office in airport planning, design, and research over the past 69 years will be utilized in the design for the Hanford Municipal Airport.

Our extensive experience in airport design throughout the United States places us in a unique position to provide inhouse a complete engineering service for engineering design of airport development projects.

Brandley Engineering understands and complies with the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Policy and Goals as established by the Federal government. Our office has established and implemented an aggressive affirmative action plan.

Page 92 of 474 ends

C-2
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 The experienced staff of Brandley Engineering provides the Sponsor the Engineering excellence needed for the design of any airport development project.

The office of Brandley Engineering has completed numerous airfield design assignments for general aviation airports that directly relate to the projects proposed at Hanford Municipal Airport. Over the past 69 years we have provided a broad range of services to all sizes of airports throughout the United States, and particularly in Northern and Central California. These services have included:

SCOPING
 Project Development
 Airport Capital Improvement Programs
 Grant Applications
ENGINEERING:
 Geotechnical Studies
 Pavement Evaluation Studies/Pavement Maintenance Management Programs  Drainage Studies and Design
 Design of Airfield Pavements including Runways, Taxiways, Aprons, Roads, and Parking Lots  Airfield Lighting and Signing
 Heliports and Helicopter Parking Areas
 Security Fencing
 Tee Hangar Development
 Visual and Navigational Aids
 Utilities
 Aircraft Storage Hangars
 Airline Terminal Facilities
 Fuel Farms
 Preparation of Cost Estimates
References for the three most comparable projects for which our firm is providing services similar to those anticipated for the Hanford Municipal Airport are as follows:
 MS. KATHERINE BALES, Former Airport Superintendent , Visalia Municipal Airport. Current Assistant Airport Manager - Napa County Airport, 2030 Airport Road, Napa, California 94558. (707) 299-1694, Katherine. [email protected]. In the last five years, Brandley Engineering provided the engineering design and construction management for the Reconstruction of Apron A2, Airfield Guidance Signs Update, Corporate and Tee Hangars – Buildings and Site Work, and the Crack Seal and Remark Airfield Pavements for the Visalia Municipal Airport.
 MS. PAULA JESSUP, Airport Manager, Tracy Municipal Airport, 5749 S. Tracy Boulevard, Tracy, California 95377, (209) 831-6215, [email protected]. Brandley Engineering performed the engineering design and construction management of the reconstruction of all pavements (runways, taxiways, aprons, and taxilanes) at the Tracy Municipal Airport and upgrades to the PAPIs, AWOS and beacon.  DANIEL SELDON, Senior Project Manager, UC Davis Design and Construction Management, TAPS Building, University of California Davis, California 95616, 530-219-7767, [email protected]. Brandley Engineering performed the engineering design and construction management for the Beacon Replacement at the University Airport. We recently completed the engineering design of the Reconstruction and Widening of Runway 17-35, Exit Taxiways, and Airfield Electrical for this airport, which will begin construction in the spring of 2023. Our office will perform the construction management/resident engineering for this project.

Page 93 of 474 ends

C-3
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 The projects described on the next several pages have included the types of services that will be required during the engineering consultation on the Airport Development Projects at the Hanford Municipal Airport.

These services include environmental studies; engineering design of pavements, grading, drainage, utilities, pavement marking and grooving, airfield lighting, electrical improvements, security fencing, tee hangars, fueling facilities, instrument approaches, and other related design elements; and resident engineering, testing, and inspection.

The projects described below were of similar nature and magnitude to those anticipated by the City of Hanford. For most projects our office provided full grant administration services including preparation of project applications to the FAA, engineering design including preparation of plans and specifications, filing all bid documentation with FAA in order to receive the grant and authorization to award the contract, conducting preconstruction conferences and preparing the minutes in order to obtain notice to proceed from the FAA, preparation of all requests for reimbursement to the FAA, filing all reports and submittals with the FAA and State, and preparation of final reports and record drawings in order to close out the grants. 7-BAY ARFF/SNOW REMOVAL FACILITY,

UTILITIES, ACCESS ROAD, AND SITE WORK
MAMMOTH YOSEMITE AIRPORT – 2022
The Town of Mammoth Lakes proposes to construct
a 7-bay ARFF/Snow Removal Facility at the Mammoth
Yosemite Airport. This facility will house the existing snow removal equipment, ARFF vehicle, and ARFF
support rooms at the airport. The facility will include a 7-bay ARFF/Snow Removal Equipment Building,
including office space, conference room, watch room,
dorm rooms, restrooms and a kitchen. This building will have a composite footprint of 10,350 sf with 9,740 sf on the first floor and 4,840 sf on the second floor for a total of 14,580 sf. To provide airfield access to the new ARFF/Snow Removal Equipment Building, it will be necessary to construct a new paved apron (30,280 sf) and airside access road (35’ x 340’). To provide landside access to the new ARFF/Snow Removal Equipment Building, it will be necessary to construct a new access road from Airport Road (24’ x 1,330’) and vehicle parking to accommodate 12 vehicle and ADA parking spaces.  Project Owner – Town of Mammoth Lakes
 Contact Person – Sierra Shultz, Deputy Airport Manager, (760) 965-3654  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer – Site Work; Building Architectural Design by NORR  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $6,600,000
 Status of Completion – Design is 90% complete, Expected bidding in Feb. 2023 RECONSTRUCT EXISTING RUNWAY 2-20 INCLUDING RUNWAY LIGHTING TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT – 2022
The 2014 Pavement Maintenance Management Plan (PMMP) prepared for Truckee Tahoe Airport shows that the pavement on Runway 2-20 needed to be reconstructed. This reconstruction will consist of the removal of the existing pavement, recompacting the existing base course, placing new aggregate base course, and placing new asphalt surface course, resulting in raising the runway 8 inches. A future planned runway widening on one side resulted in cost benefit analysis of the location of the crown of the runway. It was decided an offset crown to align with the future runway centerline was the best option. There will be new pavement section

Page 94 of 474 ends

C-4
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 constructed at the fillets for the cross taxiways required to meet the new geometry requirements for taxiway fillets in FAA’s advisory circulars. Grading along the edge of the runway will be performed and shoulders and safety areas will be regraded to drain.

The existing runway lighting system is failing and going to ground as it is an old direct burial lighting system.

The runway lighting system will be replaced, including new lights, cans, and installation of underground electrical duct, wire, and guidance signs. A new regulator will be installed in the airfield electrical vault.

 Project Owner – Truckee Tahoe Airport District
 Contact Person – Dave Hoffman, Director Operations and Maintenance, (530) 587-4119 x110  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Future Construction Management  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $5,831,000
 Status of Completion – Design is 85% complete, Expected bidding in Feb. 2023 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 12-30 AND CROSS TAXIWAYS AND AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL

INCLUDING RUNWAY EDGE LIGHTS AND PAPI
CHOWCHILLA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2022
The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) report prepared by Brandley Engineering for Chowchilla Municipal Airport indicated that the pavements on Runway 12-30 have a PCI of 32. The pavements show significant thermal and structural cracking throughout all pavements on the runway and cross taxiways. It is necessary that these pavements be reconstructed at this time. This pavement design was challenging due to the presence of saturated and soft subgrade soils created by a perched water table and a very thin existing pavement section. The proposed rehabilitation of the runway and cross taxiways will consist of leaving the existing pavement sections in place in order to protect the soft subgrade soils, placing a porous concrete base course on top of the existing pavement section to provide a drainage layer and avoid sandwich construction, and then placing asphalt pavement on top of the porous concrete.

The porous concrete base course is a unique design which was invented by Reinard W. Brandley in the 1980’s. This unique design required significant coordination and communication with the FAA Regional and Headquarters offices to obtain a Modification of Standards.

Currently the existing stake-mounted runway edge and threshold lights are in poor condition and unreliable. The existing guidance signs are stake-mounted and non- standard. The Runway 30 VASI is old and obsolete and difficult to maintain. It is proposed to replace these facilities. This project includes new runway edge and threshold lights, guidance signs, PAPI, cable and conduit, and new pilot control panel and constant current regulator.
 Project Owner – City of Chowchilla
 Contact Person – Jason Rogers, Director of Public Works, (559) 665-8615, x300  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Future Construction Management  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $5,700,000
 Status of Completion – Design completed. Construction scheduled for 2023.

Page 95 of 474 ends

C-5
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 RECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN RUNWAY 17-35, EXIT PAVEMENTS, AND AIRFIELD LIGHTING UNIVERSITY AIRPORT, DAVIS, CALIFORNIA – 2021-2022
Runway 17-35 at the University Airport in Davis, California will be reconstructed and widened by 10 feet on the east side of the runway. A reconstructed pavement section, new widened pavement section and new blast pads will be constructed. This project will require grading and stabilization of the Runway Safety Areas to FAA standards and replacement of the existing non-standard runway lighting system with a new lighting system including new duct, cable, light bases, lights, REIL, PAPI, segmented circle and wind cone and all associated items for the runway and taxiway lighting systems. The project will also include replacing the existing electrical “closet” with a new stand alone electrical vault building and vault equipment and controls and updating the transformer for the main electrical service connection. This project included significant coordination with the FAA NAS Planning and Integration team on construction of the new FAA owned PAPI.  Project Owner – The Regents of the University of California  Contact Person – Daniel Seldon, Senior Project Manager, (530) 219-7767  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer; Future Construction Management  Estimated Cost of Project - $4,081,605; Bid Cost of Project - $3,675,524  Status of Completion – Project has been bid – construction anticipated for spring/summer 2023.

AIRFIELD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
MADERA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2021-2022
The major drainage from the Madera Municipal
Airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and tee
hangar areas, carries the storm water into a ditch
and pipe drainage system in the infield between
Runway 12-30 and Taxiway P. This storm water
is then carried under the runway and drains into a
swale through the golf course to a detention pond
located at the southwest corner of the golf course.

The soil in this detention pond is very permeable
and all drain water from the airport and golf course that is delivered to this pond quickly percolates into the ground. The detention pond has adequate capacity to accommodate all drainage from the golf course and the fully developed airport.

The swale through the golf course is through relatively impervious soil and minor amounts of storm water percolate into the ground in this area. The golf course swale is of inadequate size to accommodate the storm water created by the current development, including the airport and golf course, and is unable to accept future development of the airport even though the detention pond has adequate capacity for all the anticipated drain water. Current storm water carried through the golf course creates serious flooding of the golf course and additional development on the airport will increase the problems with golf course flooding. It is proposed to relocate the discharge system from the airport to a separate drainage ditch and pipe system that will ultimately discharge into the same detention pond.
 Project Owner – City of Madera
 Contact Person – Jamie Hickman, Interim Public Works Director, (559) 232-9615  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer; Future Construction Management  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $1,095,850; Bid Cost of Project - $1,042,095  Status of Completion – Project has been bid – construction anticipated for spring/summer 2023.

Page 96 of 474 ends

C-6
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

NEW BEACON AND BEACON TOWER
CHOWCHILLA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2021-2022
There is an existing beacon tower at the Chowchilla Municipal Airport, but there is not an existing beacon on the top. The existing beacon tower is too short to allow the beacon beam proper clearance of nearby power poles. Chowchilla Municipal Airport has a runway lighting system and to meet FAA standards it is required to have a beacon. The City of Chowchilla proposes to construct a new rotating beacon on a new tip down tower.

The tower will be 45 feet in height. New electrical service and new electrical duct will be installed from the adjacent airport electrical vault.
 Project Owner – City of Chowchilla
 Contact Person – Jason Rogers, Director of Public Works, (559) 665-8615, x300  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer; Future Construction Management  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $153,725; Bid Cost of Project - $185,185  Status of Completion – Project has been bid – construction anticipated for fall 2022.

CRACK SEAL TAXIWAY A, CRACK SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL RAMP 2, CRACK SEAL RAMPS 1 AND 5
NEVADA COUNTY AIRPORT – 2021-2022
This project will consist of a crack repair, crack seal, and/or slurry seal of Taxiway A and Ramp 2 with bid alternates to include Ramps 1 & 5 at the Nevada County Airport. This is consistent with the recommendations of the recently completed 2021 PMMP. The PCI of these pavements is as follows: Taxiway A (PCI of 60 to 85, majority is 60-67), Ramp 2 (PCI of 60-65), Ramp 1 (PCI of 50), and Ramp 5 (PCI of 45-55). Taxiway A has transverse cracking at approximately 15’ to 30’ spacing that are 1” to 2” wide. These cracks require repair and resealing in order to preserve the life of the pavement surface. Ramp 2 has some fine cracks that require sealing. The surface course of Ramp 2 is very course and the fines from the asphalt have weathered away. A slurry seal is required to protect the surface and extend the life of the surface course. Ramps 1 & 5 both have light to moderate block cracking with cracks varying in width from 1/2” to 1”, These cracks require repair and resealing in order to preserve the life of the pavement surface.  Project Owner – County of Nevada
 Contact Person – Kevin Edwards, Airport Manager, (530) 273-3374  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer; Future Construction Management  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $437,255; Bid Cost of Project - $270,406  Status of Completion – Project has been bid – construction anticipated for fall 2022.

Page 97 of 474 ends

C-7
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 RECONSTRUCT TAXIWAY A AND CROSS TAXIWAYS PHASES 1 AND 2 TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT – 2016-2021
The Truckee Tahoe Airport District scheduled the reconstruction of the pavements on the parallel Taxiway A and cross taxiways in two phases. The east portion of the taxiway was reconstructed in 2016. The west portion of the taxiway was reconstructed in 2021. These projects included excavation, stabilization of subgrade soils, pulverizing existing base course and asphalt and reusing as subbase course, grading, drainage, paving, marking, new solar powered taxiway edge lights and new guidance signs.

After bids were received for the Phase 2 project, discussions were held with the FAA NAS Planning and Integration team, and it was found that the FAA pull boxes for the REIL were in Taxiway Safety Areas and did not meet FAA current standards. After coordination with the FAA NAS Planning and Integration team, it was determined that the existing conduit and pull box system for the FAA REIL would have to be protected and upgraded to the current FAA standards (FAA-C-1391e). It was determined that the most cost-effective solution was to replace the existing conduit and pull boxes and realign the conduit run so that it was a more direct routing with fewer taxiway crossings. This work was included in this project.


Project Owner – Truckee Tahoe Airport District
 Contact Person – Dave Hoffman, Director Operations and Maintenance, (530) 587-4119 x110  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management, Resident Engineering  Phase 1 – Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $2,214,950; Final Cost of Project - $2,096,487  Phase 2 – Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $3,792,175; Final Cost of Project - $3,897,905  Status of Completion – Construction completed, and grants closed out.

RECONSTRUCTION OF EAST GENERAL AVIATION APRON
MAMMOTH YOSEMITE AIRPORT – 2020-2021
The Town of Mammoth Lakes reconstructed the East General Aviation Apron at the Mammoth Yosemite Airport. The PCI of the pavement on the East General Aviation Apron was 68 in 2014 and approximately 48 in 2020. The Pavement Maintenance Management Plan that was completed in 2014 for the Mammoth Yosemite Airport indicated that this pavement section would have a deep-seated subgrade failure in 2027. It was necessary to reconstruct this pavement prior to a complete failure of the subgrade and pavement section.

Mr. Brandley, as well as his team, have extensive experience with the FAA AIP Grant program and has assisted the District successfully to complete many FAA AIP Grant Projects.
~Kevin Smith - Former General Manager, Truckee Airport

Page 98 of 474 ends

C-8
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 This project consisted of pulverizing the existing pavement section materials, excavating and temporarily stockpiling them, excavating to subgrade, placement of the pulverized materials as Aggregate Subbase Course, importing additional Aggregate Subbase Course, importing new Aggregate Base Course, and placing new Asphalt Surface Course. The project also included new aircraft tie down anchors, airfield markings, and drainage.  Project Owner – Town of Mammoth Lakes
 Contact Person – Sierra Shultz, Deputy Airport Manager, (760) 965-3654  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management, Resident Engineering  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $3,026,480; Final Cost of Project - $2,767,340  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2021.

CRACK SEAL AND REMARK AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS
VISALIA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2020
The pavement sections on most airfield pavements at the Visalia Municipal Airport are hot mix asphalt surfacing.

Several shrinkage cracks were developing in these pavements caused by age of the pavement and weathering.

To maintain the quality of pavement at the airport and to extend the life of the pavements all the cracks were sealed that had formed on Runway 12-30 (100’ x 6,561.6’), Taxiway D, Taxiway N, and the Cross Taxiways E, F, G, H, J, and K (50’ x 16,950’), Aircraft and Helicopter Parking Aprons (316,800 sq. ft.), Taxilanes (198,300 sq. ft.), and Roads and Parking Lots (203,500 sq. ft.). Brandley Engineering completed the design of the crack seal of all these pavements.

Once the design and plans and specifications were complete, the FAA indicated that there were limited funds available for this project. Our office separated the project into the runway work and the taxiway work and put the project out to bid with a Base Bid (Runway) and an Additive Alternate (Taxiway) to maximize the use of FAA funds. Very favorable bids were received due to a favorable bidding climate. After discussions among the Sponsor, the FAA, and the Brandley Engineering, it was determined to be satisfactory to add the crack sealing of the apron, hangar areas, roads and parking lots by change order.  Project Owner – City of Visalia
 Contact Persons – Katherine Bales, Former Airport Superintendent , (707) 299-1694  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management and Resident Engineering  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $1,515,350; Final Cost of Project - $870,620  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2020.

Page 99 of 474 ends

C-9
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

FUEL FARM EXPANSION
NERVINO AIRPORT, BECKWOURTH – 2020
Plumas County constructed a 12,000-gallon 100 LL Avgas fuel tank on the tiedown apron next to the existing Jet A above ground tank at the Nervino Airport, Beckwourth, California. The new 100 LL Avgas fuel tank serves the increased demand for Avgas. Above ground fuel tank construction and installation was conducted in accordance with FAA Order 1050.15, Fuel Storage Tanks at FAA Facilities, and applicable US EPA regulations, 40 CFR parts 112, 280 and 281. The new fuel tank was constructed on the existing tie-down apron next to the existing fuel storage system. The Avgas fuel storage tank has key-lock system and is pilot operated.  Project Owner – County of Plumas
 Contact Person – JD Moore, Director of Facility Services and Airports, (530) 283-6069  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management and Resident Engineering  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $329,900; Final Cost of Project - $378,755  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2020.

HANGAR DEVELOPMENT – BUILDING AND SITE WORK
VISALIA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2018-19
Visalia Municipal Airport received a Grant Agreement from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) under the Community Flexibility Pilot Program for the construction of aircraft hangars. The Visalia Municipal Airport serves general aviation needs in Tulare County. Many aircraft, ranging from the small single-engine aircraft to the business jet aircraft, are based at the Airport. Aircraft owners are desirous of storing their aircraft in hangars and the Airport has a waiting list for hangars from the small single-engine airplanes to the business jets. Brandley Engineering prepared the design and plans and specifications for this project for both the civil work and the building work.

The project was bid with a Base Bid and two Additive Alternates to maximize the funding available under the DOT grant. The Base Bid included one 4-unit corporate hangar building (125’ x 140’), Additive Alternate A included one 8-unit nested tee hangar building, and Additive Alternate B included one 7-unit standard hangar building. There was not enough funding to construct all three buildings based on bids received. The City was desirous of constructing the corporate hangar and the 8-unit nested tee hangar, but the bids received were still over the funding available. Melissa Brandley of Brandley Engineering worked with the contractor for the civil work to negotiate a reduction in prices to bring the total cost within the grant amount available.  Project Owner – City of Visalia
 Contact Persons – Katherine Bales, Former Airport Superintendent , (707) 299-1694  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management, and Resident Engineering  Estimated Construction Cost of Project (Base Bid + Alternate A) - $3,945,775; Bid Cost of Project - $4,030,870; Contract Amount with Negotiated Change Order - $3,769,234  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2020.

Page 100 of 474 ends

C-10
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

AIRPORT FUEL TANKS PROJECT
LINCOLN REGIONAL AIRPORT – 2019
The City of Lincoln installed a new fuel system consisting of two 12,000-gallon UL 2085 tanks with bulk loading at the Lincoln Regional Airport. These tanks are designed for storage of flammable and combustible liquids at atmospheric pressure. The specific type-fuel stored in these tanks is Avgas,100LL UN 1203, and/or Jet-A, UN 1863. The system was designed for loading refueling vehicles and for self-service over-the-wing aircraft fueling. The system includes:
• 1 fuel dispenser for Avgas and provision for the addition of a second fuel dispenser on the other end of the tank in the future.
• 1 fuel dispenser for Jet-A and provisions for the addition of a future ‘daughter’ Jet A tank in the future.
• 1 credit card reader – One Owner provided credit card reader was installed and connected by the contractor the north end of the tanks between the dispensers.
 Project Owner – City of Lincoln
 Contact Person – Roland Neufeld, Senior Engineer,
(916) 434-2481
 Specific Involvement – Design Engineer and Construction Management
 Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $690,000; Final Cost of Project - $1,080,400 Not funded under AIP
 Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2020.

UPGRADE AIRFIELD GUIDANCE SIGNS
VISALIA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2019
The existing airfield guidance sign system at Visalia Municipal Airport did not meet current FAA standards. It was necessary to upgrade the sign system to meet these requirements. Brandley Engineering prepared the engineering design and preparation of plans and specifications for this project. The project included furnishing and installing new LED airfield guidance signs, relocating existing airfield guidance signs, and replacing sign panels on existing airfield guidance signs.

A change order was issued during this project for retrofit kits on old existing signs (2009) since the manufacturer no longer provided FAA-approved replacement bulbs for these signs. A retrofit kit was available to convert the existing signs to be compatible with the new style FAA approved bulbs which were readily available. In order to provide the Airport with a FAA compliant Airfield Guidance Sign system, these retrofit kits were installed on all existing ADB airfield guidance signs.
 Project Owner – City of Visalia
 Contact Persons – Katherine Bales, Former Airport Superintendent , (707) 299-1694  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management, and Resident Engineering  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $144,695; Final Cost of Project - $208,317  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2020.

Page 101 of 474 ends

C-11
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

RECONSTRUCT TEE HANGAR TAXILANES
TRACY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2018-19
The City of Tracy retained the services of Brandley Engineering to prepare a Pavement Maintenance Management Plan (PMMP). This study included geotechnical studies, pavement condition surveys, and non-destructive tests and analyses. These studies showed severe cracking of the existing sections of pavement on the runways, cross taxiways, general aviation tie down apron, and tee hangar taxilanes. It was recommended that reconstruction of the pavements at this airport be completed as early as funding became available. Brandley Engineering prepared the engineering design, plans and specifications for the reconstruction of the runways, taxiways, the general aviation apron, and the tie down apron such that plans and specifications were “on the shelf” ready to bid.

The City of Tracy reconstructed the tee hangar taxilanes at Tracy Municipal Airport in 2019. This was the third and final phase of the reconstruction of all pavements at this airport. Brandley Engineering provided the engineering design and construction management of this project. The scope of work of this project was the reconstruction of the tee hangar taxilanes and aprons to the existing hangar area (718,470 sq. ft.).

Existing drainage in the tee hangar development area is sheet flow over the total 300-foot width of the old landing strip at Tracy Municipal Airport. Each of the hangars flooded during any storms that occurred at the airport. The design of the reconstruction of the hangar taxilanes was prepared to eliminate this flooding within the buildings by regrading the pavements between the buildings such that they slope away from the buildings to a swale. New drain lines were installed as needed.
 Project Owner – City of Tracy
 Contact Person – Paula Jessup, Airport Manager, (209) 831-6215  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management, and Resident Engineering  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $1,989,400; Final Cost of Project - $1,773,100  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2019.

UPGRADE SEGMENTED CIRCLE AND WIND CONE
MAMMOTH YOSEMITE AIRPORT – 2018
The Town of Mammoth Lakes upgraded the existing segmented circle, primary wind cone and supplementary wind cone for Runway 27 at the Mammoth Yosemite Airport. The existing segmented circle and primary wind cone were removed. A new segmented circle and primary wind cone were installed north of Taxiway A. To accommodate snow plow operations, the new segmented circle consists of a 125’ x 160’ x 3” thick asphalt pad with a painted segmented circle. A 12-foot-wide asphaltic concrete access road was constructed from the asphalt pad to the edge of Taxiway A to provide access during the winter months for plowing the snow off the segmented circle pad.

The existing primary wind cone, a L-807 wind cone, was removed and replaced with a L-807 LED wind cone. The existing supplementary wind cone for Runway 27 was removed and a new L-806 LED wind cone was located north of the holding apron and East of Taxiway A1.
 Project Owner – Town of Mammoth Lakes
 Contact Person – Sierra Shultz, Deputy Airport Manager, (760) 965-3654  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management, and Resident Engineering  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $318,430; Final Cost of Project - $499,860  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2019.

Page 102 of 474 ends

C-12
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

EXECUTIVE HANGAR DEVELOPMENT
TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT – 2017-18
The Truckee Tahoe Airport District constructed two 5-unit executive hangar buildings (64’ x 337’) at the Truckee Tahoe Airport. This project included the site work, buildings, drainage, utilities, paving, and marking. Brandley Engineering prepared the engineering design and plans and specifications for this project. The site work and the building work were bid separately. The building plans set forth the minimum layout and requirements for the hangars. The contractor was required to develop and submit design calculations, plans, and specifications, for the construction of the hangars.
 Project Owner – Truckee Tahoe Airport District
 Contact Person – Dave Hoffman, Director Operations and Maintenance, (530) 587-4119 x110  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer and Surveillance During Construction  Estimated Construction Cost of Project - $6,392,750; Final Construction Cost - $7,156,400  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2018.

RECONSTRUCT APRON A2
VISALIA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2017
The pavements on Apron A2 were originally constructed
in 1986. According to the PMMP prepared by Brandley
Engineering these pavements only had two years remaining life with forecast traffic. Our office prepared the engineering design, plans and specifications for the reconstruction of these pavements. The project included grading, drainage, paving, and marking. A new piping system was installed to transport drain water to existing drainage pipes.

Due to the uncertainty of the amount of FAA funding that would be allocated for this project, the project was bid with a Base Bid and two Additive Alternates. Once bids were received, FAA issued a grant for the entire project.
 Project Owner – City of Visalia
 Contact Persons – Katherine Bales, Former Airport Superintendent , (707) 299-1694  Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction Management, and Resident Engineer  Estimated Cost of Project - $1,803,945; Final Construction Cost - $1,185,870  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2017.

Page 103 of 474 ends

C-13
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

RECONSTRUCT GENERAL AVIATION TIE DOWN APRON
TRACY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT – 2017
In 2015 Brandley Engineering prepared the engineering design for the reconstruction of all pavements at the Tracy Municipal Airport. In 2017 the general aviation tie down apron (608,900 sq. ft.) was reconstructed including grading, drainage, paving, marking, and tie downs. This was the second phase reconstruction of all pavements at the Tracy Municipal Airport. Brandley Engineering provided the construction management for this project.
 Project Owner – City of Tracy
 Contact Person – Paula Jessup, Airport Manager,
(209) 831-6215
 Specific Involvement – Design Engineer, Construction
Management, and Resident Engineering
 Estimated Cost of Project - $4,222,440; Final Construction Cost - $2,643,000  Status of Completion – Construction completed in 2017.

Page 104 of 474 ends

C-14
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022 Pavement Maintenance
Management Plans
Airfield Pavements
Lighting and Signage
Electrical Systems
NAVAIDs
Fencing/Access Control
Systems
Drainage
Fueling
Construction
Management
Alturas Municipal Airport
Beckwourth - Nervino Airport
Bryant Field
Chester - Rogers Field
Chico Municipal Airport
Chowchilla Municipal Airport
Colusa County Airport
Fresno Chandler Executive Airport
Lake Tahoe Airport
Lampson Field Airport
Lincoln Regional Airport
Madera Municipal Airport
Mammoth Yosemite Airport
Nevada County Airport
Oroville Municipal Airport
Placerville Airport
Quincy - Gansner Field
Sacramento Executive Airport
Sacramento Mather Airport
Sacramento International Airport
Stockton Metropolitan Airport
Tracy Municipal Airport
Truckee Tahoe Airport
Tulelake Municipal Airport
University Airport - Davis
Visalia Municipal Airport
Watsonville Municipal Airport

BRANDLEY ENGINEERING

REPRESENTATIVE ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING
2012 THROUGH 2022
Representative Architechtural/Engineering
2012 Through 2022
A matrix showing representative airport design/engineering tasks performed by Brandley Engineering over the past 10 years is included below.

Page 105 of 474 ends

D-1
HANFORD MUNICIPAL RFQ #22-05 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES NOVEMBER 4, 2022

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

SECTION D
Brandley Engineering has no financial, business, or other relationship with the City of Hanford or with any member of the City staff that would have an impact on the outcome of projects at the Hanford Municipal Airport.

Brandley Engineering has no clients who would have a financial interest in the outcome of projects at the Hanford Municipal Airport.

Page 106 of 474 ends

Hanford City CouncilSeptember 19, 2023

Hanford City Council
September 19, 2023