12.H.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Resolution No. 24-10-R, Authorizing the City Manager to submit a grant application up to $1.2 million, conduct negotiations, execute and submit documents on behalf of the City of Hanford for the California Urban and Community Forestry Inflation Reduction Act Grant.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: The City Council, by motion, adopt Resolution 24-10-R for the grant application up to $1.2 million for the California Urban and Community Forestry Inflation Reduction Act Program and authorizes the City Manager to conduct negotiations, execute and submit documents on behalf of the City of Hanford
BACKGROUND:
On September 20, 2023, the City of Hanford received notice that it was awarded $1,000,000 from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service Urban and Community Forestry Inflation Reduction Act to establish a comprehensive urban forestry program (Hanford Goes Green) to ensure equitable access to trees and their benefits, especially within disadvantaged areas within the City of Hanford.
In addition to the USDA grant described above, CAL-FIRE released a Request for Proposals (RFP) on March 7, 2024, to solicit proposals due on May 30, 2024. Six grant types are listed. The Urban Forest Expansion and Improvement category best fits the City of Hanford’s urban forestry needs.
About the CAL FIRE Urban and Community Forestry Program Urban forests reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while increasing climate resilience, reducing the impacts of extreme heat, increasing energy conservation, reducing storm-water runoff, extending the life of surface streets, improving local air, soil, and water quality, providing high-quality jobs, and improving public health.
The mission of the CAL FIRE Urban & Community Forestry Program is to advance the development of sustainable and accessible urban and community forests in California. CAL FIRE envisions urban and community forests that are healthy, extensive, and well-managed, providing a wide array of optimal benefits to all Californians. Under the authority of the California Urban Forestry Act of 1978, CAL FIRE’s Urban & Community Forestry Program is responsible for leading the effort to advance the development of sustainable urban and community forests in California through technical assistance, grant administration, and resource and partnership development.
This is accomplished through expanding and improving the planting and management of trees and associated vegetation in communities throughout California, with a strong emphasis on disadvantaged and low-income communities. CAL FIRE’s Urban & Community Forestry Program directly assists these communities with grants and hands-on scientific and technical assistance to achieve more equity in tree canopy distribution.
With a strong emphasis on serving disadvantaged and low-income communities, the USDA relies upon the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CJEST) to define disadvantaged community status and determine the match waiver. According to the CJEST mapping tool, the City of Hanford is divided between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged status (see the attached CJEST map of Hanford).
Based on this information, the staff is proposing to expand Hanford’s urban forest by planting 100- 150 new drought-tolerant trees within the following locations:
• Heroes Park
• Coe Park
• Centennial Park
• Lacey Park
• Hanford Soccer Complex (Soc Com)
• Civic Park
• Medians
Tree planting will be shared through the Helping Hands volunteer program, Arbor Day celebrations, Parks Division, and in coloration with the Sequoia Community Conservation Corps.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The grant opportunity would provide the City of Hanford with $850,000-$1,200,000 for urban forest expansion. 100% of the funds awarded through this grant opportunity must be spent on projects within urban Priority Populations, which include state-designated disadvantaged communities (DAC), low-income communities (LIC), and/or low-income households (LIH). Match or cost-share requirements are waived for this CAL FIRE Urban and Community Forestry IRA grant opportunity. There would be no contribution needed from City funding (such as the General Fund). The project will be fully covered with grant funding.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Reolution 24-10 Cal Fire Grant Application
2. CJEST Map - Hanford, CA
RESOLUTION 24-10
Resolution No.: 24-10
RESOLUTION OF THE_________________________________ OF ____________________________________ (Title of Governing Body) (City/County/District/nonprofit)
FOR FUNDING FROM THE URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION.
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California in cooperation with the State Legislature has appropriated General Funds for the state’s urban forestry programs; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies and non-profit organizations under the program, and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application before submission of said application to the State; and
WHEREAS, the applicant will enter an agreement with the State of California to carry out an urban forestry project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the _________________________:
(Title of Governing Body)
1. Approved the filing of an application for the Urban and Community Forestry grant program funds; and
2. Certifies that said applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and,
3. Certifies that funds under the jurisdiction of ________________________are available to begin the project. (Title of Governing Body)
4. Certifies that said applicant will expend grant funds prior to March 31, 2028.
5. Appoints ______________, or a designee, as agent of the _______________________to conduct negotiations, (Position Title) (Title of Governing Body) execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the afore mentioned project.
Approved and adopted the __________day of _________, 20________.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, number___________________, was duly adopted by the following roll call vote of the _____________________________________________________ . (City Council/Board of Supervisor/Board of Directors)
Ayes: _______ Noes: _________ Absent: ________ ____________________________________(Clerk signature)
City Council The City of Hanford
City Council
The City Manager The City of Hanford
City Council
Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CJEST)
Disadvantaged Community and Match Waiver Indicator
Hanford, CA
Disadvantaged Status
Non-Disadvantaged Status
12.I.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Approval of the 2nd amendment to the 1600 acre lease between the City of Hanford and Philip Verwey Farms to allow for a credit of $31.00 per acre, to Philip Verwey Farms, for discing services of City-owned property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve the 2nd amendment to the agricultural lease between the City of Hanford and Philip Verwey Farms and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.
BACKGROUND:
Phillip Verwey Farms and the City of Hanford entered into an agricultural lease agreement for 1600 acres of city property outside the City limits in August 2023. During the negotiations, former Public Works Director James Ross agreed that the City would provide Philip Verwey Farms a $31.00 credit per acre for disking the property. It was also agreed upon that said credit would be applied to the first year's lease.
This side agreement was reached during the negotiation phase of the contract and, unfortunately, was not applied to the original lease. Philip Verwey Farms has provided copies of the communications which document these negotiations, and this amendment will update the lease agreement to reflect those charges. The amendment will result in a credit of $49,600 being applied to the first-year lease agreement, leaving a balance due for $112,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This amendment will result in $49,600 being recognized in the Wastewater fund for the first year of the agreement, but it was already recognized in the departmental budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 2nd Amendment to Agriculture Lease
12.J.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Authorization to advertise for bids for the FY 24 Pavement Resurfacing Treatment Project and Pre- Authorization for the City Manager to award and execute the contract on behalf of the City to the lowest responsible bidder providing project bid is within current budget appropriation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, authorize staff to advertise for bids for the FY 24 Pavement Resurfacing Treatment Project, and Pre-Authorize the City Manager to award and execute the contract on behalf of the City to the lowest responsible bidder, providing the project bid is within current budget appropriation.
BACKGROUND:
Pavement resurfacing treatment is a surface protection and pavement preservation treatment for city streets. The location of streets and the types of treatment processes will be determined by the Public Works Director and/or Department staff and is dependent on pavement conditions. Treatments may include slurry seal, cape seal or fiber seal coatings or other pavement preservation treatments needed to extend the useful life of roadways.
Asphalt concrete pavement surfaces deteriorate over time due to loss of oil content from naturally occurring processes and vehicular traffic loads. Pavement resurfacing treatments will extend the useful life of asphalt concrete pavement surfaces, thereby reducing street maintenance costs. This project will provide single fiber seal coating surface treatment for approximately three (3) miles of roadways (17,900 SY). See attached maps for specific streets.
After bid opening, Staff will examine the bids, validate the lowest bidder's contractor's license status, and verify the contractor is in good standing. Staff are requesting the pre-authorization to award and execute the contract in order to expedite the process of delivery of projects and to avoid winterization. With Council approval, staff will solicit bids for this project. If awarded, construction is anticipated to begin in Summer 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY 24 Capital Improvement budget provides $511,286, which includes construction, contingencies, material testing, and staff time. If the proposal is within the City’s approved budget, staff will proceed with the award of the project, otherwise the council may need to approve additional appropriations. A copy of the Budget Page is attached for Council review.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Budget Page
2. 2024 Location Map
823618
Project Background:
Existing Conditions:
Project Justification:
Fiscal Implications:
Project Budget Summary:
6-Year Funding Allocation
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Program or Project Construction Construction Construction Construction Con struction Construction Engineering / Inspection 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ Construction 850,000.00 $ 850,000.00 $ 450,000 .00 $ 850,000.00 $ 850,000.00 $ Contingency 85,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 45,000 .00 $ 85,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ Department Overhead 49,850.00 $ 36,690.00 $ 4,286.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ Total Expenditure 996,850.00 $ 983,690.00 $ 51 1,286.00 $ 950,000.00 $ 950,000.00 $ Funding
0045 Gas Tax 367,261.00 $ 362,412.00 $ 511,286. 00 $ 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 0050 Gas Tax (TDA Transportation) 629,589.00 $ 612 ,278.00 $ - $ 600,000.00 $ 600 ,000.00 $ 0045 Gas Tax (RMRA)
Total Funding 996,850.00 $ 974,690.00 $ 511,28 6.00 $ 950,000.00 $ 950,000.00 $ Pavement resurfacing treatment is a surface protection and pavement preservation treatment for city streets. The location of streets and the types of treatment processes will be determined by Public Works Department staff and is dependent on pavement conditions.
Treatments may include slurry seal, cape seal or fiber seal coatings or other pavement preservation treatments needed to extend the useful life of roadways.
Pavement Resurfacing Treatment
Expenditure Revenue
Pavement resurfacing treatments will extend the useful life of asphalt concrete pavement surfaces, thereby reducing street maintenance costs. This project will provide surface treatment for approximately three (3) miles of roadways (17,900 SY).
Funding for this project will be allocated from Gas Tax Reserves.
Asphalt concrete pavement surfaces deteriorate over time due to loss of oil content from naturally occurring processes and vehicular traffic loads.
NOT TO SCALE
12.K.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Resolution No. 24-11-R, Authorizing the Fleet Division Superintendent to make applications for, sign assurances for, and administer the Zero-Emission Electric Vehicle Replacement Incentive Program and the Zero-Emission Landscaping Equipment (ZELE) Voucher Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: The City Council, by motion, Adoption Resolution No. 24-11-R, authorizing the Fleet Superintendent to make applications for, sign assurances for, and administer the Zero- Emissions Programs including, but not limited to:
• Zero-Emission Electric Vehicle Replacement Incentive Program • Zero-Emission Landscaping Equipment (ZELE) Voucher Program
BACKGROUND:
In 2021, California passed AB 1346, which restricts the sale of small off-road engines (SORE), including landscaping tools and equipment under 25 hp. That law was effective January 1, 2024.
Moving forward, all equipment purchased must be zero-emission per the legislation. There are programs to help offset the increased price of electric-powered equipment, such as ZELE and the Zero Emissions Electric Vehicle Replacement Incentive Program.
ZELE provides an exchange program that gives the agency credit for old gas-powered equipment, allowing the agency to transition to battery-powered equipment more cost-effectively. The Zero- Emission Electric Vehicle Replacement Incentive Program gives grants to fund new vehicles to offset a gas equivalent. Both programs will require staff to report on annual usage and complete reports to the Air Board.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ZELE program vouchers vary based on the equipment being replaced and range from $700-$1400 per unit being replaced. As existing equipment reaches the end of its useful life, the City must purchase new equipment. Without participation in this program, the City would bear all new equipment costs. By participating in the program, the City could offset 75% or more of the cost of the new equipment, including extra batteries and chargers. Existing equipment will be maintained and kept useful as long as reasonably feasible. The Parks budget will be able to accommodate more equipment for the same or less than the cost of new equipment.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESOLUTION 24-11
RESOLUTION 24-11
Authorizing the Fleet Division Superintendent to make applications for, sign assurances for, and administer the Zero-Emission Electric Vehicle Replacement Incentive Program and the Zero- Emission Landscaping Equipment (ZELE) V oucher Program
It was approved by the City of Hanford that the following Resolution be adopted:
Resolution authorizing the City of Hanford to make applications for and to sign certain assurances with respect to applications for local, state and federal programs projects or grants.
Whereas, Several Local, State and Federal programs allow public and non-profit transportation providers to apply for administration, capital, and operation assistance programs or grant; and
Whereas the City of Hanford must authorize someone by resolution as the “Authorized Individual” to make application and administer the Zero-Emission electric vehicle Replacement Incentive program; and the Zero-Emission Landscaping Equipment (ZELE) V oucher Program;
Now therefore be it resolved that the City of Hanford hereby authorized Glen Weaver to make application for, to sign required assurances and to administer the Zero-Emission electric vehicle Replacement Incentive program with respect to applications for Local, State and Federal programs, projects or grants, on behalf of this City.
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City of Hanford at a regular meeting thereof, held on the _____ day of __________, _______.
_________________________________
Authorized Official
12.L.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Approval of the Notice of Completion for Tract No. 929 Unit No. 1, near the Northeast corner of 13th Ave and Devon St., and Authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder’s Office.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council, by motion, approve a Notice of Completion for Tract No. 929, Unit No. 1 and authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder’s Office.
BACKGROUND:
Tract 929, Unit No. 1, is an 80 lots single family development that is located at the northeast corner of 13th Avenue and Devon Street, as shown on the Final Map (attached for reference). The developer of the subdivision is Woodside 06N, LP. The developer has completed all public improvements to the subdivision and posted a ten percent (10%) warranty security, which shall remain in effect for a minimum of one year after the attached Notice of Completion is recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The public improvements have been constructed by the developer as required by the subdivision conditions of approval, and no fiscal impact to the budget will result from approval of the Notice of Completion.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 504. 532 TR929-1
2. TR 929-1 Subdivision Agreement - Signed
12.M.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Approval of the Notice of Completion for Tract No. 928 Unit No. 4, near the Southeast corner of Centennial Drive and Fargo Avenue, and Authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder’s Office.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council, by motion, approve a Notice of Completion for Tract No. 928, Unit No. 4 and authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder’s Office.
BACKGROUND:
On July 7, 2023, the Council approved the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement (attached for reference) for Tract No. 928 Unit 4, a 92-lot residential subdivision, located as shown on the attached map. The developer of the subdivision is San Joaquin Valley Homes, Presidio JJR Bella Vista II 150, LLC. The developer has completed all public improvements for the subdivision and posted a ten percent (10%) warranty security, which shall remain in effect for a minimum of one year after the attached Notice of Completion is recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The public improvements have been constructed by the developer as required by the subdivision conditions of approval, and no fiscal impact to the budget will result from approval of the Notice of Completion.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Recorded Final Map 8.10.23
2. Tract 928-1 Subd. Agrmnt.
12.N.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Approve an appropriation of $18,548.92 from the Storm Drain Operations Fund for the Mussel Slough lift station and authorization to pay the associated SCE Energy Usage Invoice in the amount of $18,548.92.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve an appropriation for the Mussel Slough Lift Station SCE energy usage invoice in the amount of $18,548.92 from the Storm Drainage Operations Fund.
Recommended Motion:
I motion to approve an appropriation from the Storm Drainage Operations Fund for the Mussel Slough Lift Station SCE energy usage invoice in the amount of $18,548.92.
BACKGROUND:
On March 9, 2022, City Council awarded a contract to Todd Companies for the construction of the Mussel Slough Lift Station Installation project. The project is located at the BNSF Tracks, 600 ft. north of Grangeville Boulevard, and consisted of constructing a new storm water lift station in the Mussel Slough basin to pump storm water into a storm water transmission main. The project was completed successfully and under budget. Attached as Attachment 1 is the Notice of Completion for Council review.
On December 21, 2021, during the design phase of the project, city staff requested a new electrical service from Southern California Edison for the lift station equipment and pumps. SCE provided a "Rule 15 Service Agreement" between the City and SCE for the installation of the service. The Rule 15 Service Agreement, (Attachment 2), is a Contract for the Extension of an Electric Distribution Line and states the responsibilities of the City and SCE for the construction along with the anticipated revenues to be generated from the new service. The agreement states that the city may receive a refund or a bill after one year based on the Option and the amount of usage of the service after one year.
The SCE Agreement had two Options for installation of the electrical service:
Option 1: REFUNDABLE OPTION – The electrical service is installed by a Qualified Contractor.
The city collects bids for the work, track costs, and SCE will utilize their estimated costs for billing and accounting, and the costs are subject to refund. SCE’s estimated refundable costs are based on the work that SCE would normally perform that can be performed by a Qualified Contractor. For the
service, the full estimated cost for construction was $31,512.33. This full amount would be the City's Obligation under Option 1.
OR
Option 2: DISCOUNT OPTION (Selected Option) – The electrical service is installed by SCE crews.
The city pays in advance the SCE estimated installation costs with discounts applied for anticipated usage. A minimal payment is made, and after one year of usage, the revenues generated by the service are determined, and the city may receive a refund, OR may be subject to additional costs.
Based on the full cost of $31,512.33 and the expectation that the anticipated usage would be met, city staff selected the installation to be performed by SCE crews, Option 2: DISCOUNT OPTION.
The invoice was paid to SCE for the initial costs in the amount of $2,607.37.
The Service Agreement provided a Ready to Serve (RTS) date of 11/30/2022. The RTS is the date that SCE agrees to provide an electrical service to the project. At the end of one year from the RTS date, SCE determines the amount of revenue generated by the new service and calculates a refund or a balance due for the service installation.
The project construction was completed in December 2022. Due to the project timeline, Mussel Slough was kept drained during the rain season, and did not retain the typical storm water collected between October and April. Without the storm water, the pump did not run for the season, and the anticipated usage, and the anticipated revenue of the lift station was not achieved.
Per the SCE Agreement, if the service installed does not generate the anticipated revenue, the city is subject to pay 50% of the construction costs deficit.
The attached Invoice and Calculation (Attachment 3) shows the full Obligation for the new service of $31,512.33. The new service generated $1,594.71 in revenues, which leaves a remaining Obligation of $29,917.62. With the 50% reduction, the city obligation for the service is $18,548.92, including taxes. Note that this is substantially less than what was quoted for the full cost stated in Option 1. This SCE invoice is currently due.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Mussel Slough Lift Pump Project was funded through the Storm Capital fund and Storm Drain Impact Fees, Project #21840000-820648. The attached Notice of Completion report was approved by City Council on February 7, 2023, and shows the project was completed under budget, with a credit amount of $32,263.63. At project completion, it was assumed that these funds were no longer needed, and they were returned unemcumbered.
For the city to pay the invoice to SCE, an appropriation of $18,548.92 from the Storm Drainage Operations Fund is needed to process the final invoice as stated in the Southern California Edison usage agreement.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 1-Notice of Completion Report
2. 2-Rule 15 Service Agreement with SCE
3. 3-SCE Invoice
FINAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND FINANCE HISTORY
PROJECT: Mussel Slough Lift Pump Station Installation Project CONTRACTOR: JT2 Inc. dba Todd Companies
P.O. Box 6820
Visalia CA 93230
CONTRACT DATES: Council Award March 9, 2022
Bid Opening March 8, 2022
Contractor Started Work September 6, 2022
Contract Time of Completion October 5, 2022
Contractor Completed Work December 5, 2022 (2 months delay due to SCE material lead times and scheduling)
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS:
No change orders on this project
FINANCIAL HISTORY:
REVENUE OF PROJECT FUNDING
0358 Storm Drainage Capital
0184 Storm Drainage Impact Fees
TOTAL BUDGET FUNDING $187,500.00
ADJUSTMENTS
Overhead $7,500.00
Overhead Reversed -$7,500.00
Equipment Training – PO Voided -$2,072.94
ADJUSTED BUDGET TOTAL $185,427.06
PROJECT EXPENDITURE:
Hanford Sentinel - Project Advertisement $269.73
Building Permit Fee $266.00
JT2 Todd Companies Construction Contract $112,015.00 Southern California Edison – Line Extension $2,607.37 QK – Construction Staking $2,515.00
Bogie Pump – Pump Equipment $35,490.33
Engineering / Inspection $0.00
Contingency $
0.00 Total Construction Cos t $153,163.43
Balance (Credit) ($32,263.63)
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
12.O.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Approval of a Change Order increase for Potholing Services, with QK, Inc, in the amount of $49,088.36 for the East Lacey Boulevard Phase 1 and Phase 2 Design Services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve an appropriation from the project budget Transportation Impact Fees Fund (0181) for a Change Order in the amount of $49,088.36 for Potholing Services on East Lacey Boulevard between 10th Avenue and east of Sierra Drive.
Recommended Motion: I motion to (approve/not approve) an appropriation from the project budget Transportation Impact Fees Fund for a Change Order in the amount of $49,088.36 for Potholing Services on East Lacey Boulevard between 10th Avenue and east of Sierra Drive.
BACKGROUND:
On September 20, 2022, City Council awarded a contract to QK, Inc. of Visalia CA for the design and professional engineering services for the East Lacey Boulevard Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety project from 10th Avenue to east of Sierra Drive in the amount of $869,482.90.
The original contract scope included Potholing Services for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 in the combined amount of $20,823.99, with the understanding that once topographic survey and utility information was collected, the locations and scope of potholing would possibly need to be revised.
With the progression of the design development plans, multiple locations were identified where there are potential conflicts with existing utilities in the roadway. By potholing, the existing pipe is exposed, and a surveyor collects the elevation depths of the pipeline so that conflicts are avoided during construction. The scope for potholing increased due to multiple high pressure gas mains in the roadway that potentially conflict with the utilities designed for the project.
The City initially reached out to Southern California Gas Company to determine their ability to provide the pothole information to the City and The Gas Company informed the City that they did not have the capacity to reasonably provide the potholing services to the city. Staff requested the additional costs from QK to complete the potholing services.
The total combined costs for potholing for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 was provided to the City in the amount of $69,912.35. The original contract provided $20,823.99 for potholing. An additional $49,088.36 is needed from the project budget Transportion Impact Fee Fund (0181) to complete the potholing services and provide the underground utility information needed to complete the design of
the project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The existing East Lacey Boulevard Pedestrian Facilities Transportation Impact Fund budget (0181) for Design Consultant Services has a current balance of $327,359.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. CHANGE ORDER 1 - POTHOLING
CITY OF HANFORD
Depa r tm en t of P u bl i c W or ks
900 South 10th Ave. • HANFORD, CA 93230-5234 • (559) 585-2550
ENGINEERING DIVISION CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
REV. NO.
PROJECT East Lacey Blvd. Pedestrian Facilities Project – PS&E SHEET 1 OF 1
TO CONSULTANT: QK CONTRACT NO. 21800000-82 3619.
YOU ARE HEREBY DIRECTED TO MAKE THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CHANGES FROM THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR DO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED WORK NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ON THIS CONTRACT.
NOTE: THIS CHANGE ORDER IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL APPROVED BY THE CITY.
Contract Amount: $869,482.90
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE, ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES AND PRICES TO BE PAID. SEGREGATE BETWEEN ADDITIONAL WORK AT CONTRACT PRICE, AGREED PRICE AND FORCE ACCOUNT. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, RATES FOR RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT COVER ONLY SUCH TIME AS EQUIPMENT IS ACTUALLY USED AND NO ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE FOR IDLE TIME.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: City of Hanford
THE LAST PERCENTAGE SHOWN IS THE NET ACCUMULATED INCREASE OR DECREASE FROM THE ORIGINAL QUANTITY IN THE ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE.
1. The project scope included minimal potholing services with the understanding that once topographic survey and utility information was collected, the locations would need to be reviewed. Consultant shall provide potholing services at additional identified locations to locate existing underground utilities and avoid conflicts with design and construction.
For a net increase of $49,088.36.
ESTIMATED COST THIS CHANGE: $49,088.36
CONTRACT TOTAL, INCLUDING THIS CHANGE $918,571.26
BY REASON OF THIS ORDER THE TIME OF COMPLETION WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: no change APPROVAL RECOMMENDED, ENGINEER DATE 4/20/24
APPROVED, CITY OF HANFORD DATE
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED CONTRACTOR, HAVE GIVEN CAREFUL CONSIDERATION TO THE CHANGE PROPOSED AND HEREBY AGREE
IF THIS PROPOSAL IS APPROVED, THAT WE WILL PROVIDE ALL EQUIPMENT, FURNISH ALL MATERIALS, EXCEPT AS MAY
OTHERWISE BE NOTED ABOVE, AND PERFORM ALL SERVICES NECESSARY FOR THE WORK ABOVE SPECIFIED, AND WILL ACCEPT
AS FULL PAYMENT THEREFOR THE PRICES SHOWN ABOVE
ACCEPTED, DATE 03/28/2024 CONSULTANT _ QK
BY TITLE CFO/COO
IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT SIGN ACCEPTANCE OF THIS ORDER, HIS ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS AS TO PROCEEDING WITH THE ORDERED WORK AND FILING A WRITTEN PROTEST WITHIN THE TIME THEREIN SPECIFIED.
March 25, 2024
Lisa Dock
City Engineer
City of Hanford
900 S. 10th Avenue
Hanford, CA 93230
Subject: Lacey Boulevard Widening Project Revised Cost Proposal - Additional Potholing for Subsurface Utilities Dear Ms. Dock:
Based on our recent discussions, enclosed is an extra work proposal for additional contractual services relating to the Lacey Boulevard Widening Project from 10 th Avenue to Sierra Drive for the City of Hanford.
Thank you for your continued confidence with the QK team. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this proposal further, please contact Monique Mello or Jeff Cowart at (559) 733-0440. We look forward to beginning this work upon your approval.
Sincerely,
Monique Mello, PE Jeffery S. Cowart, PE
Project Manager/Branch Manager - Visalia VP of Municipal Services & Quality Control Enclosure: Revised Scope of Services and Project Budget Summary P230458/220291.01
cl/mcm/jld/jsc
Revised Scope of Services and Project Budget Summary
City of Hanford Page 1 of 2
Lacey Boulevard Widening Project Revised Cost Proposal (P230458/220295.01) March 25, 2024
BACKGROUND
Quad Knopf, Inc. (dba QK) has produced 60% plan sets for the Lacey Boulevard Widening Project from 10th Avenue to Sierra Drive. During the design and preparation of these plans, and the recommendations from the Geotechnical Report, QK has met with the City of Hanford (City) and identified that additional potholing will be required to verify subsurface conditions and to avoid issues relating to conflicts during the construction process. Potholing will allow the design team to clearly identify issues with crossing existing utilities and provide for a more efficient construction process.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Based on recent discussions with Lisa Dock, City Engineer for the City, the following revisions to the scope of the contract have been addressed in this extra work proposal:
The City will be responsible for performing services related to the identification of 47 locations for potholing work to be completed.
QK and team will be responsible for coordinating the potholing with the City and Southern California Gas to maintain safe operations while identifying existing sizes and depths of subsurface infrastructure. QK will be responsible for potholing for the project. QK will identify locations of tree wells and street trees, irrigation controller locations, and electrical service locations for the tree wells.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following scope of services has been developed based on our understanding of the project as well as the stated objectives communicated by the City in our recent discussion as described in the Project Understanding above. Fees associated with the tasks identified in the following scope of services are provided in the Proposed Budget Summary section for City review and consideration. As a subconsultant to QK, Badger Daylighting (Badger) will complete the scope of services described in this proposal.
Subtask 4.6 Potholing (Modified with this Scope of Work) QK will coordinate the required potholing with Badger. Potholing locations will be identified for the existing utility conflicts with proposed improvements. Anticipated conflict areas will be potholed to identify locations, depths, types, and number of affected utilities such as the high-pressure gas lines and portions of the water mains as well as some of the services/laterals. The coordinates and elevations of the utilities will be determined from site control points and benchmarks. Prior to potholing, Underground Service Alert (USA) will be notified to mark existing utilities in the area.
Once Badger completes potholing, QK will survey the exposed utilities. In addition, USA markings will also be surveyed.
The survey information will be included in the base map to be used during the design process. It is anticipated backfilling of the bore locations will be with aggregate base or sand cement slurry followed by a surface treatment complying with the City of Hanford Improvement Standards. Backfill borings within a landscaped area shall be firmly recompacted and landscaping that has been removed or damaged shall be replaced in kind.
Badger will obtain the necessary encroachment permits from the City and provide all traffic control for the potholing.
Badger will provide a traffic control plan, IMSA or ATSSA certified or approved by a licensed civil engineer, to the City for review and approval prior to beginning any potholing services.
Results will be provided to the design team to aid in the design of the proposed improvements to avoid any utility conflicts, to the extent possible. Results will also be provided to the utility companies in conflict identifying facilities that will require relocations and/or lowering to support the new improvements. Rights checks will be requested by each affected utility to determine the party responsible for the costs of the relocations.
City of Hanford Page 2 of 2
Lacey Boulevard Widening Project Revised Cost Proposal (P230458/220295.01) March 25, 2024 QK has identified 47 locations that need to be potholed to determine the effect of existing infrastructure on the proposed design.
PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY
A proposed fee and effort table for the changes above is included on the following page as a part of this proposal.
The original proposal included potholing costs of $10,411.99 in Phase 1A and $10,411.99 in Phase 2.
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
Services described herein will be authorized upon execution of an Amendment to the Architectural and Engineering Consultant Agreement between QK and the City of Hanford for the project. We can begin our services immediately upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed.
PROPOSAL LIMITATION
This proposal shall be effective for only 90 days from the date of submittal. Any extension of the proposal beyond 90 days is subject to a mutual agreement between QK and the City. Otherwise, QK will provide an updated proposal after the 90 days have expired.
QK Project Manager: Monique Mello, PE
Project Name: East Lacey Blvd Pedestrian Facilities Improvements (Phases 1a and 2) QK Proposal No. P230458/220295.01
TOTAL LABOR
Subconsultant Fee
TOTAL
NON-LABOR
EXPENSES
TOTALS
4.6 - Field Work $7,182.00 – $0.00 $7,182.00
- Office Work $6,102.00 – $0.00 $6,102.00
- Potholing - Badger Daylighting $56,628.35 $56,628.35 $56,628.35 - Costs included in original proposal -$10,643.00 -$10,180.99 $0.00 -$20,823.99 $2,641.00 $46,447.36 $56,628.35 $49,088.36
$2,641.00 $46,447.36 $46,447.36 $49,088.36
Notes:
1. Expenses for reproduction, mailing, mileage, etc. are billed separately OR included in the fixed fee above and billed per our attached Charge Rate Schedule.
2. All time-and-materials fees will be invoiced monthly based on the level of effort in terms of hours relative to our Charge Rate Schedule.
4. Tasks billed by fixed fees will be invoiced monthly based on the percentage of work completed.
5. Additional Services requested in writing and approved by the client will be provided on a time-and-materials basis.
3. When a Task is set on a time-and-materials fee basis, it signifies that it is not possible to accurately predict the amount of work effort required typical of on-call type services. QK will work with the client to set expectations where applicable.
Task Description
Subtask 4.6 – POTHOLING
PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY
Client Name: City of Hanford
TOTALS
Subtotals
3/25/2024 Page 1 of 1
Reference is made to the East Lacey Boulevard
Potholing locations maps as separate document.
12.P.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Authorization to accept the Homeland Security Grant, which was awarded through the County of Kings, for portable radios in the amount of $55,448, and an amendment to the General Fund budget to recognize $55,448 in grant fund revenue, and Appropriation of $55,448 in the General Fund for a capital improvement project for this portable radio project for the Police Department, and Authorization for the City Manager to execute the grant agreement.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: Authorization to accept the Homeland Security Grant for portable radios from the County of Kings in the amount of $55,448, and an amendment to the General Fund budget to recognize $55,448 in grant funds, appropriate $55,448 in the General Fund for a capital improvement project for this portable radio project for the Police Department, and authorize the City Manager to execute the grant agreement.
Recommended Motion:
I move to authorize accepting the Homeland Security Grant for portable radios from the County of Kings in the amount of $55,448, and an amendment to the General Fund budget to recognize $55,448 in grant funds, appropriate $55,448 in the General Fund for a capital improvement project for this portable radio project for the Police Department, and authorize the City Manager to execute the grant agreement.
BACKGROUND:
The Hanford Police Department sought The Homeland Security Grant through the County of Kings.
The department submitted a project proposal for funds to be able to replace portable radios. The portable radios that the department currently has are outdated. With new portable radios, the officers will not have any issues communicating with each other. These grant funds will allow the department to purchase twenty-seven (27) Kenwood Handheld Radios.
There are no matching funds associated to this grant. An appropriation for the amount of the grant ($55,448) will be made to expend the funds. There may be minor expenditures that will have to occur in excess of the grant amount as the grant administrator wants the agency to expend all of the funds and it is not possible to expend the exact amount. We will strive to get as close as possible to the actual grant amount and minimize the impact of the department's original operating budget. Any amount in excess would be absorbed within the existing Police Department budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact will be a total of $55,448 of grant monies to the City, no City matching funds are required. If approved, a budget amendment to recognize the grant funds and an appropriation of funds in the amount of $55,448 to the General Fund for the Police Department will be made. The City will be reimbursed once the project is completed by the grant administrator.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Agreement
2. OES Letter
12.Q.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Acceptance and authorization for staff to File the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Reports as of 03/31/2024.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept and authorize staff to file the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Report as of 03/31/2024.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that the City Council accept and authorize staff to file the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Report as of 03/31/2024.
BACKGROUND: Quarterly Investment Report. The City has approximately $118.8 million in investments and cash as of 03/31/2024.
Recent Activity. The City actively maintains its Wells Fargo cash accounts at a minimum of $2.5 million. Typically, idle cash beyond the necessary $2.5 million minimum cash needed for operations is invested into the local government pools such as LAIF. However, staff reviewed other government investment pools where yields are trending higher than the investments with LAIF and Tulare County Pool. In March, staff created an account with CLASS (California Cooperative Liquid Assets Securities System) which was created via a joint exercise of powers agreement by and among California public agencies. The Board of California CLASS is made up of public agency Finance professionals who participate in the pool and are members of the of the JPA. They are also sponsored by the California League of Cities and the CA Special Districts Association. Their yield rates at time of account creation were in the 5% range whereas LAIF and Tulare County Pool were in the 4% range.
Current Investment Environment. The Federal Reserve did not cut interest rates at the January meeting and many experts believe that the Fed will hold rates steady at a target rate of 5.25%-5.50% as they wait for inflation to ease a bit more. Economists and strategists now see the Fed waiting until at least September to cut interest rates and are increasingly entertaining the possibility of no reductions at all this year (CNBC).
The 10-year Treasury Note interest is currently up at approximately 4.64% versus 4.10% at the end of last quarter. At the same time last year, the rate was lower at 3.60%.
Proposed Actions. The City will use funds from matured securities to re-invest in 1–3-year securities.
Operations will be monitored for financial needs and when large sums of idle cash are available, can be re-invested. With the joining of California CLAAS local government staff plans to transfer money from the Tulare County Pool into CLASS where higher yields will be earned. Tulare County Pool will remain open with the minimum balance required.
Summary. The primary purpose of the City’s cash is to provide residents of Hanford with services. In order to maximize the earnings potential on the City’s idle cash, the City utilizes registered securities dealers to purchase low-risk investments which will provide a higher return versus allowing the cash to be held in savings accounts earning little to no interest. Additionally, idle cash is also held with government pools, including the Tulare County Investment Pool and the State of California LAIF. It is the policy of the City to invest public funds in a manner that will provide a high investment return with a high level of security while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the entity and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds
FISCAL IMPACT: This item is informational. Investing the City's cash will generate continual interest earnings on the investment portfolio.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Quarterly Investment Detail Report 03.31.24
2. Quarterly Transactions Report 01.01.24-03.31.24
3. Quarterly Treasurer's Report 03.31.24
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Quarterly Investment Detail Report 03.31.24
2. Quarterly Transactions Report 01.01.24-03.31.24
3. Quarterly Treasurer's Report 03.31.24
Description CUSIP/Ticker Security Sector Settlement Date YTM @ Cost Face Amount/Shares Cost Value Market Value Maturity Date Days To Maturity % of Portfolio Bank Baroda NY 0.65 7/22/2025 06063HMT7 Certificate Of Deposit 7/22/2020 0.650 198,000.00 198,000.00 187,094.16 7/22/2025 478 0.17 Bank of New York Mellon 1.6 4/24/2025-25 06406RAN7 Corporate 5/13/2020 1.216 1,000,000.00 1,018,368.00 961,800.00 4/24/2025 389 0.84 Barclays Bank 5 6/6/2025 06740KRQ2 Certificate Of Deposit 6/7/2023 5.000 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,845.00 6/6/2025 432 0.21 BMO Harris Bank IL 0.5 3/28/2025-21 05600XAY6 Certificate Of Deposit 9/28/2020 0.500 249,000.00 249,000.00 237,949.38 3/28/2025 362 0.21 Capital Bank 4.65 11/8/2024 139805AX3 Certificate Of Deposit 11/9/2022 4.650 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,095.00 11/8/2024 222 0.21 Capital One 4.8 11/3/2025 14042RVH1 Certificate Of Deposit 11/2/2022 4.800 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,530.00 11/3/2025 582 0.21 Citadel Federal PA 1.65 2/27/2025 17286TAG0 Certificate Of Deposit 2/27/2020 1.650 250,000.00 250,000.00 242,245.00 2/27/2025 333 0.21 Continental Bank UT 0.55 6/26/2025 211163KK5 Certificate Of Deposit 6/26/2020 0.550 175,000.00 175,000.00 165,625.25 6/26/2025 452 0.15 Direct Federal CDT Union 4.7 11/3/2025 25460FDU7 Certificate Of Deposit 11/3/2022 4.700 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,065.00 11/3/2025 582 0.21 Enerbank UT (Regions) 0.5 8/29/2025 29278TRA0 Certificate Of Deposit 8/31/2020 0.500 245,000.00 245,000.00 229,988.85 8/29/2025 516 0.21 FHLB 0.5 10/4/2024-22 3130AP4G7 US Agency 10/4/2021 0.500 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 976,580.00 10/4/2024 187 0.84 FHLB 0.5 9/24/2024-21 3130ALKN3 US Agency 3/24/2021 0.500 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,955,060.00 9/24/2024 177 1.68 FHLB 0.57 10/15/2024-22 3130ALWW0 US Agency 4/15/2021 0.570 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 975,390.00 10/15/2024 198 0.84 FHLB 5.125 5/28/2026-24 3130AWAA8 US Agency 5/30/2023 5.125 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 994,720.00 5/28/2026 788 0.84 FHLB 5.475 6/1/2026-23 3130AWBD1 US Agency 6/1/2023 5.475 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,002,820.00 6/1/2026 792 1.68 FHLB Step 1/27/2025-22 3130AQML4 US Agency 1/27/2022 1.370 325,000.00 325,000.00 316,420.00 1/27/2025 302 0.27 FHLMC 5.32 6/6/2025-24 3134GYTM4 US Agency 6/6/2023 5.320 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 996,700.00 6/6/2025 432 0.84 First Choice Bank CA 0.4 9/30/2025-21 319461DB2 Certificate Of Deposit 9/30/2020 0.400 249,000.00 249,000.00 232,568.49 9/30/2025 548 0.21 First National Bank TX 1.8 12/30/2024 32112UDJ7 Certificate Of Deposit 12/30/2019 1.800 250,000.00 250,000.00 243,737.50 12/30/2024 274 0.21 First Technology Federal 5.1 6/16/2025 33715LFK1 Certificate Of Deposit 6/16/2023 5.100 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,177.50 6/16/2025 442 0.21 Greenstate Credit Union 0.5 7/30/2024 39573LBQ0 Certificate Of Deposit 7/30/2021 0.500 250,000.00 250,000.00 245,950.00 7/30/2024 121 0.21 Horizon Bk 4.75 11/8/2024 44042WCG0 Certificate Of Deposit 11/8/2022 4.750 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,215.00 11/8/2024 222 0.21 Insight4.6 5/2/2025 45791JAA4 Certificate Of Deposit 11/2/2022 4.600 250,000.00 250,000.00 248,750.00 5/2/2025 397 0.21 Jonesboro State Bank LA 0.8 5/29/2025-20 48040PGX7 Certificate Of Deposit 5/29/2020 0.800 249,000.00 249,000.00 237,043.02 5/29/2025 424 0.21 Luana Savings Bank IA 0.45 7/29/2025 549104RJ8 Certificate Of Deposit 7/29/2020 0.450 250,000.00 250,000.00 235,410.00 7/29/2025 485 0.21 Medallion Bank UT 0.55 7/30/2025 58404DHQ7 Certificate Of Deposit 7/30/2020 0.550 250,000.00 250,000.00 235,627.50 7/30/2025 486 0.21 Merrick Bank UT 1.85 12/31/2024 59013KEP7 Certificate Of Deposit 12/31/2019 1.850 250,000.00 250,000.00 243,797.50 12/31/2024 275 0.21 Partners Bank AK 0.6 6/30/2025 70212VAB4 Certificate Of Deposit 6/30/2020 0.600 250,000.00 250,000.00 236,587.50 6/30/2025 456 0.21 Pentagon Federal Credit Union 0.55 9/30/2024 70962LAR3 Certificate Of Deposit 9/29/2021 0.550 250,000.00 250,000.00 244,105.00 9/30/2024 183 0.21 Sallie Mae Bank UT 1.9 10/30/2024 7954504Z5 Certificate Of Deposit 10/30/2019 1.900 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,051.00 10/30/2024 213 0.08 State Bank of India GA 0.95 6/26/2025 856283N69 Certificate Of Deposit 6/26/2020 0.950 250,000.00 250,000.00 237,045.00 6/26/2025 452 0.21 Synchrony Bank 0.9 12/10/2024 87165HK41 Certificate Of Deposit 12/10/2021 0.900 250,000.00 250,000.00 242,605.00 12/10/2024 254 0.21 Texas Exchange Bank TX 0.5 7/30/2024 88241TLS7 Certificate Of Deposit 7/30/2021 0.500 249,000.00 249,000.00 244,968.69 7/30/2024 121 0.21 United Heritage 4.75 11/4/2025 91334AAE3 Certificate Of Deposit 11/4/2022 4.750 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,287.50 11/4/2025 583 0.21 Sub Total / Average Brokerage | Higgins Capital 2.462 15,539,000.00 15,557,368.00 15,214,853.84 412 13.06 Ally Bank5.15 12/9/2024 02007GN90 Certificate Of Deposit 6/8/2023 5.150 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,870.00 12/9/2024 253 0.21 Austin Telco FCU 4.95 7/26/2024 052392CL9 Certificate Of Deposit 1/27/2023 4.950 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,682.50 7/26/2024 117 0.21 Bank Hapoalim BM NY 5.2 12/9/2024 06251A5Q9 Certificate Of Deposit 6/9/2023 5.200 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,850.00 12/9/2024 253 0.21 FFCB 4.92 1/12/2026 3133ENR77 US Agency 12/7/2022 4.920 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 996,490.00 1/12/2026 652 0.84 FFCB 5.58 12/7/2026 3133EPK38 US Agency 12/7/2023 5.580 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,040.00 12/7/2026 981 0.84 FHLB 1.9 12/14/2026 3130APY33 US Agency 2/29/2024 4.531 1,000,000.00 931,700.00 934,140.00 12/14/2026 988 0.84 FHLB 4.5 3/12/2027 3130AVBC5 US Agency 3/7/2024 4.500 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,450.00 3/12/2027 1,076 0.42 FHLB 5 12/12/2024 3130ATXG7 US Agency 12/12/2022 5.000 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 996,880.00 12/12/2024 256 0.84 FHLB 5 7/18/2025-24 3130AYKP0 US Agency 1/23/2024 5.000 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 998,000.00 7/18/2025 474 0.84 FHLMC 5.15 2/14/2025-24 3134GYJ29 US Agency 1/9/2024 5.150 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 998,750.00 2/14/2025 320 0.84 FHLMC 5.3 2/27/2026-23 3134GYJB9 US Agency 5/26/2023 5.300 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,991,320.00 2/27/2026 698 1.68 FHLMC 5.3 5/15/2025-23 3134GYRH7 US Agency 5/26/2023 5.300 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 996,850.00 5/15/2025 410 0.84 FHLMC 5.65 3/13/2026-23 3134GYKT8 US Agency 11/17/2023 5.650 950,000.00 950,000.00 949,591.50 3/13/2026 712 0.80 First Carolina Bank 5.25 7/15/2024 31944MCU7 Certificate Of Deposit 6/14/2023 5.250 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,767.50 7/15/2024 106 0.21 IC Federal Credit Union 5 6/10/2024 44931EAD3 Certificate Of Deposit 12/9/2022 5.000 240,000.00 240,000.00 239,844.00 6/10/2024 71 0.20 Liberty Fed Credit Union 4.9 12/9/2024 53052LAE9 Certificate Of Deposit 12/9/2022 4.900 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,437.50 12/9/2024 253 0.21 MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK 4.35 3/13/2028 61768ET78 Certificate Of Deposit 3/13/2024 4.350 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,857.50 3/13/2028 1,443 0.21 NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANK 5.2 12/13/2024 664122BN7 Certificate Of Deposit 12/15/2023 5.200 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,850.00 12/13/2024 257 0.21 PREFERRED BANK LA CALIF 5.2 12/20/2024 740367SU2 Certificate Of Deposit 12/22/2023 5.200 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,870.00 12/20/2024 264 0.21 SUTTER HEALTH 1.321 8/15/2025 86944BAF0 Corporate 12/6/2023 5.522 874,000.00 815,450.74 827,844.06 8/15/2025 502 0.73 UBS BANK USA 4.35 3/13/2028 90355GLP9 Certificate Of Deposit 3/13/2024 4.350 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,950.00 3/13/2028 1,443 0.21 WESTERN ALLIANCE BK PHOENIX 5.25 5/24/2024 95763PMY4 Certificate Of Deposit 5/26/2023 5.250 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,887.50 5/24/2024 54 0.21 Zions Bank Corp 5.2 12/6/2024 98970LFU2 Certificate Of Deposit 6/7/2023 5.200 250,000.00 250,000.00 249,947.50 12/6/2024 250 0.21 Sub Total / Average Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities 5.133 14,314,000.00 14,187,150.74 14,178,169.56 581 12.03 FHLB 2.3 3/28/2025-22 3130AREM9 US Agency 3/28/2022 2.300 250,000.00 250,000.00 243,267.65 3/28/2025 362 0.21 Wells Fargo Securities MM WFMM5968 Money Market 11/3/2021 0.000 2,875.00 2,875.00 2,875.00 N/A 1 0.00 Sub Total / Average Brokerage | Wells Fargo Securities 2.274 252,875.00 252,875.00 246,142.65 358 0.21 Local Agency Investment Fund LGIP LAIF6352 Local Government Investment Pool 2/28/2009 4.232 22,701,800.69 22,701,800.69 22,701,800.69 N/A 1 19.08 Sub Total / Average LGIP | LAIF 4.232 22,701,800.69 22,701,800.69 22,701,800.69 1 19.08 Tulare County Pool LGIP TULARE860 Local Government Investment Pool 5/5/2017 3.305 47,802,079.95 47,802,079.95 47,802,079.95 N/A 1 40.18 Sub Total / Average LGIP | Tulare County 3.305 47,802,079.95 47,802,079.95 47,802,079.95 1 40.18 Umpqua MM MM7248 Money Market 8/19/2022 0.010 4,000,637.78 4,000,637.78 4,000,637.78 N/A 1 3.36 Sub Total / Average Umpqua Bank 0.010 4,000,637.78 4,000,637.78 4,000,637.78 1 3.36 US Bank Cash USBANK Cash 10/31/2022 0.000 1,481,783.79 1,481,783.79 1,481,783.79 N/A 1 1.25 Sub Total / Average US Bank Custodian | Fixed Assets 0.000 1,481,783.79 1,481,783.79 1,481,783.79 1 1.25 Umpqua Bank
US Bank Custodian | Fixed Assets
Wells Fargo | Operating Accounts
City of Hanford
Quarterly Investment Detail Report
As of 03/31/2024
Brokerage | Higgins Capital
Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities
Brokerage | Wells Fargo Securities
LGIP | LAIF
LGIP | Tulare County
Description CUSIP/Ticker Security Sector Settlement Date YTM @ Cost Face Amount/Shares Cost Value Market Value Maturity Date Days To Maturity % of Portfolio City of Hanford
Quarterly Investment Detail Report
As of 03/31/2024
Wells Fargo | General Account Cash WFGENERAL5186 Cash 10/31/2007 0.000 136,348.00 136,348.00 136,348.00 N/A 1 0.11 Wells Fargo | Self Insurance Cash WFSELFINS1892 Cash 6/30/2020 0.000 137,755.89 137,755.89 137,755.89 N/A 1 0.12 Wells Fargo | Sweep Cash WFSWEEP5186 Cash 6/30/2020 0.000 12,599,110.02 12,599,110.02 12,599,110.02 N/A 1 10.59 Sub Total / Average Wells Fargo | Operating Accounts 0.000 12,873,213.91 12,873,213.91 12,873,213.91 1 10.82 Total / Average 3.080 118,965,391.12 118,856,909.86 118,498,682.17 125 100
Description CUSIP/Ticker Settlement Date Face Amount/Shares Principal Total Portfolio Name FHLB 1.9 12/14/2026 3130APY33 2/29/2024 1,000,000.00 931,700.00 935,658.33 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities FHLB 4.5 3/12/2027 3130AVBC5 3/7/2024 500,000.00 500,000.00 510,937.50 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities FHLB 5 7/18/2025-24 3130AYKP0 1/23/2024 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,694.44 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities FHLMC 5.15 2/14/2025-24 3134GYJ29 1/9/2024 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,020,743.06 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK 4.35 3/13/2028 61768ET78 3/13/2024 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities UBS BANK USA 4.35 3/13/2028 90355GLP9 3/13/2024 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities Sub Total / Average Buy 4,000,000.00 3,931,700.00 3,968,033.33 FHLB 5.5 11/24/2025-23 3130AW5T3 2/24/2024 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,013,750.00 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities Sub Total / Average Called 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,013,750.00 Citibank NA 3.65 1/23/2024-23 17325FAS7 1/23/2024 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Brokerage | Higgins Capital General Electric Credit Union 5 1/30/2024 369674CG9 1/30/2024 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities John Deer Capital 2.6 3/7/2024 24422EUX5 3/7/2024 700,000.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 Brokerage | Higgins Capital Toyota Motor Credit 0.45 1/11/2024 89236THU2 1/11/2024 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Brokerage | Higgins Capital Valley Strong 4.9 1/31/2024 920133AM7 1/31/2024 250,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 Brokerage | Multi-Bank Securities Sub Total / Average Matured 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00 City of Hanford
Quarterly Transactions Report
01/01/24-03/31/24
Buy
Called
Matured
CITY OF HANFORD, CALIFORNIA
Treasurer's Report
March 31, 2024
Performance
Weighted Average Yield 3.084%
Diversification | Security Sector % of Portfolio YTM @Cost Days to Maturity
Face Amount /
Shares Cost Value Market Value
Cash 12.11% 0.00% 1 14,354,998 14,354,998 14,354,998
Money Market 3.38% 0.01% 1 4,003,513 4,003,513 4,003,513 Local Government Investment Pool 59.50% 3.60% 1 70,503,881 70,503,881 70,503,881 Certificate of Deposit | Negotiable 7.61% 3.09% 387 9,204,000 9,204,000 9,023,178 Corporate Bonds 1.51% 3.21% 441 1,874,000 1,833,819 1,789,644 US Agency Bonds 15.88% 4.13% 548 19,025,000 18,956,700 18,823,469
99.99% 3.084% 124 118,965,391 118,856,910 118,498,682
12.11%
3.38%
59.50%
7.61%1.51% 15.88% 03/31/24
Cash
Money Market
Local Government Investment Pool
Certificate of Deposit | Negotiable
Corporate Bonds
US Agency Bonds
13.A.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 5/7/2024 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING
SUBJECT:
Approval and Adoption of Community Development Block Grant Draft Consolidated Plan for 2024- 2028 and Draft Annual Action Plan for 2024-2025.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Hanford City Council:
1. Open the public hearing and accept comments regarding the CDBG proposed 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan and 2024-25 Action Plan.
2. Adopt Resolution R-24-09 Authorizing and Approving the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan and 2024-25 Action Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement program allocates annual grants to larger cities and urban counties to develop viable communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and opportunities to expand economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administers this program. It determines the amount of the jurisdiction's grant using a formula comprised of several measures of community need, including the extent of poverty, population, housing overcrowding, age of housing, and population growth lag compared to other metropolitan areas.
CDBG funding supports the development of viable urban communities by supporting projects and activities that create or enhance the availability of decent housing, suitable living environments, and expansion of economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons.
The City of Hanford annually receives a CDBG entitlement allocation and is required to apply for funding directly to HUD by submitting a Five-Year Consolidated Plan.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTION
The CDBG Program is authorized under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act 1974. In November 2003, the City of Hanford became an Entitlement Community within the Community Development Block Grant Program. Each year, an application identifying activities listed as a priority in the Five-Year Consolidated Plan must be submitted to HUD via an Annual Plan. The Consolidated Plan objectives must include providing decent housing, a suitable living environment,
and expanded economic opportunities. The elements consist of a detailed profile of the community, a housing and community development needs assessment, priority needs, specific objectives, a strategic plan to meet those needs, and a description of how the proposed programs address the needs and objectives. The priority needs, goals, and potential programs. The current Five-Year Consolidated Plan covers 2019-2023, was approved in May 2019, and expires on June 30, 2024.
The five-year Consolidated Plan" establishes the priority goals of the City's CDBG program for the five subsequent Annual Action Plans. The established goals are required to meet one of three CDBG National Objectives:
1. Provide a benefit for low and moderate-income persons;
2. Eliminate slums and blight;
3. Meet an urgent community need.
This year, the City will adopt the Consolidated Plan for the next five years, covering 2024 through 2028. During the development of the Consolidated Plan, the following priority needs and goals were established on pages 96 and 109 of Attachment A.
Annual Action Plan: The Annual Action Plan for FY 2024-2025 is part of the Consolidated Plan and serves as the City's application for funding from HUD. HUD has released the funding allocations for the 2024-2025 CDBG program; the estimated budget was based on the year's allocation.
As presented during the Study Session on April 2, 2024. For 2024-2025, the Council directed staff to distribute the estimated budget of $920,598, including $521,703 in Entitlement funds and $398,895 in Program Income to the following projects:
The 2024-2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN is included in the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan, page 124 of Attachment A
Project Description Funding
Housing Rehabilitation
(includes 10% activity delivery)
Single-family home repair
program
$268,479
First Time Homebuyer Program Acquisition $125,000
Community
Development/Enhancement Project
Funding for prospective
projects includes acquiring,
rehabilitating, and
infrastructure for affordable
housing sites and public
facilities.
$200,000
Public Services
Description (15% of Total
Budget)
Kings County Commission on
Aging-
Senior Services, Meal Delivery $78,000
City of Hanford Parks and
Community Services
Scholarship Program $14,000
Kings Tulare COC Homeless Services
Point in Time
$10,000
Kings Community Action
Organization
Program Support
KCAO will support the
operation of these overnight
shelters and navigation
$36,000
centers, aiming to assist
unhoused individuals residing
in Hanford.
Administration
(20% of Total Budget)
Grant Planning and Oversight $184,119
Total $920,598
Backup Projects: The City may include a backup list of projects in the Action Plan. Should funding become available, projects completed below budget, canceled, or delayed for various reasons, these projects will be activated. Approval of the Action Plan by the City Council and HUD will be considered as approval for the backup projects. Activating the backup projects does not constitute a substantial amendment to the Action Plan.
Housing Rehabilitation
(additional funding will be added to the total) $ 200,000 First-time Homebuyer Assistance $ 150,000 Community Development/Enhancement $ 200,000 Additional funding for Public Service Subrecipients Subject to 15% CAP
Preferential consideration will be given to projects demonstrating the ability to spend CDBG funds on time, consistent with the City's goal to meet CDBG timeliness rules and the project community's needs as defined in the Consolidated Plan.
Draft Documents for Public Review:
The Hanford Sentinel newspaper noticed a Public Notice for a 30-day public comment period beginning on March 22, 2024, for the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan and 2024-2025 Action Plan. No comments were received as of the date of preparation of this report.
FISCAL IMPACT
This action is a prerequisite to ensuring the City can receive its anticipated $521,703 CDBG entitlement funds.
ACTION FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will submit the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan and 2024-25 Action Plan HUD before May 15, 2024. Funds will be available upon HUD's approval of the Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact to the General Fund
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Attachment A - Hanford Consolidated Plan 2024-2028
2. Attachment B - Resolution 24-09 - CDBG Consolidated Plan 2024-2028 & Action Plan 2024- 2025
1 ATTACHMENT “A”
2024-2028
CONSOLIDATED PLAN
2024-2025
ACTION PLAN
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS:
THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ............................................................................ 4 Introduction: .......................................................................................................... 4 Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview ........................................................................................... 4 Evaluation of past performance: ............................................................................ 5 Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process ..................... 6 Public Meetings and Hearings ............................................................................... 6 THE PROCESS: .................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 10 PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l) ................................................ 10 PR-15 Citizen Participation .................................................................................. 15 Citizen Participation Methods ............................................................................. 15 NA-05 Overview .................................................................................................. 17 NA‐10 Housing Needs Assessment ‐ 24 CFR 91.205 (a, b, c) ............................... 18 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ........ 27 NA‐20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ........................................................................................................................... 30 NA‐25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) .. 33 Housing Cost Burden .......................................................................................... 33 NA‐30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) .................... 35 NA‐35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) Introduction .................................................. 36 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c) Introduction: .......................... 40 NA‐45 Non‐Homeless Special Needs Assessment ‐ 91.205 (b, d) ........................ 48 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) ..................... 51 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: ....................................................................... 55 MA‐05 Overview .................................................................................................. 55 MA‐10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) ........................................... 56 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction ......... 60 MA‐20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) .................... 63 MA‐25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b)................................................. 66 MA‐30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) .......................................... 70 MA‐35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) Introduction ................ 73
3 MA‐40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e) .............................................. 76 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) Introduction 77 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) .............................................................. 88 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3).......................................... 90 STRATEGIC PLAN: ........................................................................................... 93 SP‐05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview ............................................................. 93 SP‐10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) Geographic Area ............................. 94 SP‐25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2) ..................................................................... 96 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) Influence of Market Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 103 SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c) (1,2) .............................. 104 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k) ............................................. 107 SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4) ............................................................... 111 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) ...................... 114 SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.215(h) .............................................. 115 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d) ....................................................... 116 SP-65 Lead-based paint Hazards – 91.215(i) .................................................... 119 SP‐70 Anti‐Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j) ............................................................ 121 SP‐80 Monitoring – 91.230 ............................................................................... 123 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN: ................................................................................ 124 AP‐15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c) (1,2) Introduction. ................................ 124 ANNUAL GOALS & OBJECTIVES: .................................................................. 126 PROJECTS: .................................................................................................... 128 AP‐35 Projects – 91.220(d) Introduction: .......................................................... 128 AP-38 Project Summary .................................................................................... 131 AP‐50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f) ........................................................ 135 AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g) .............................................................. 136 AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h) .................................................................... 137 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities - 91.220(i) ........................ 139 AP-75 Action Plan Barriers to Affordable Housing - 91.220(j) ............................ 142 AP-85 Other Actions - 91.220(k) ........................................................................ 143 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.220(l) (1,2,4) .................................. 145
4 THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Introduction:
ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
The Consolidated Plan is a five-year housing plan mandated by the Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD). The plan identifies entitlement communities and functions as a housing manual to benefit moderate to low -income residents. The Consolidated Plan will provide housing-related guidance to the city of Hanford, California.
The Consolidated Plan will direct Community Development Building Grant (CDBG) funding opportunities. The Consolidated Plan is an application for funding from HUD for federal programs.
The Consolidated Plan outlines a comprehensive plan establishing a unified, coordinated vision for community development that benefits low -income residents and areas from 2024—2028. The City of Hanford gathers input from citizens, consults its community development partners, and conducts extensive research to determine housing and community development needs. The City of Hanford also partners with nonprofit and for- profit organizations, neighborhood groups, and other local governments to undertake specific actions using the strategies developed. A vital element of this Consolidated Plan is the collaborative nature of the process.
Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview
The overview will focus on the findings and discoveries from the needs assessment. The plan outlines the various necessities and efficiently how to deal with any shortcomings. By understanding these objectives and outcomes, the city of Hanford’s administr ation can align its strategies and actions to resolve the following points:
• Invest in neighborhood infrastructure in low and moderate-income areas. • Invest in remediation of access and mobility barriers in all neighborhoods. • Continue to expand the housing rehabilitation assistance to low and moderate-income residents.
• Continue to expand down payment assistance to low and moderate-income residents. • Invest in public facility improvement that serves low and moderate-income residents. • Invest in capacity and programmatic enhancements for service providers primarily serving low —and extremely low -income residents, particularly those at risk of experiencing poverty.
• homelessness.
• Invest in neighborhood and strategic planning to help identify needs within the community.
5 Performance measurement is a critical process that allows organizations to assess and evaluate the effectiveness of their programs in meeting their target audience's needs. By systematically collecting and analyzing data, performance measurement provides insights into how healthy programs perform and whether they achieve their intended outcomes. It serves as a valuable tool for decision -making, enabling organizations to identify areas for improvement, make informed adjustments, and optimize resource allocation.
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process Citizen Participation Plan (CPP)
The Citizen Participation Plan describes the framework and process for developing and implementing Hanford’s housing and community development program required by HUD.
The citizen participation plan is essential to the consolidated plan, ensuring that residents have a voice in shaping their communities' future. This subtopic aims to comprehensively understand the citizen participation plan and its significance. The citizen participation plan outlines how local governments engage with residents, community organizations, and stakeholders in decision-making. Utilizing survey tools can assist researchers in obtaining insight and perception of the general public. Their opinions are invaluable and should be a resource tool in shaping housing policies.
Stakeholders Engagement:
Stakeholder engagement is the most time-consuming and thorough of all the analysis that makes up the Con Plan. The time -consuming nature of stakeholder engagement arises from the need to actively involve and collaborate with various individuals or groups with a vested interest in the project or initiative.
Evaluation of past performance:
The primary programs administered by the Community Development Department over the past five years are listed below:
Affordable Housing:
Emergency Repair Programs (up to $24,999 per household) CDBG funds will be used to assist first-time, deficient, and low-income families in purchasing a home. Up to $75,000 in down payment assistance and closing costs.
Public Service, Homeless Reduction:
The endeavor to reduce homelessness was a joint venture between the City of Hanford, Kings County, and Tulare Continuum of Care. CDBG funds will help fund various activities, including, but not limited to, the Annual Project Homeless Connect and Point in Time census.
6 Public Facilities and Improvements
Lacey Park Playground Improvements include removing 17 -year-old playground equipment and installing new ADA-compliant playground equipment.
Updated and replaced defective or dilapidated streetlights.
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process
Citizens could contribute to the Consolidated Plan via online anonymous and paper surveys. The survey allowed the citizens of the city of Hanford a real -time outlet to voice their opinions regarding the housing environment in Hanford.
All comments gathered during the public input and consultations with the City of Hanford’s community development partners in developing this plan have been included as attachments.
Public Meetings and Hearings
In preparing the Consolidated and Annual Action Plan, the Department of Community Development followed the schedule below:
▪ Kings County Homelessness Collaborative Monday, September 18, 2023, at 1:30 pm ▪ City Council Meeting Study Session and Public Comment, Tuesday, April 2, 2024. ▪ City Council Meeting Public Comment Review and Adoption, Tuesday, May 7, 2024. ▪
Summary of public comments
The online and paper surveys show growing discontent with housing conditions in Hanford.
Residents expressed anxiety over the rising price of homes, some failing infrastructure, and a disconnect between their elected officials and everyday citizens.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not receiving them.
All comments and views will be incorporated into the final document.
Summary
To enhance collaboration with different jurisdictions and foster partnerships between various levels of government and the private sector, the Consolidated Plan encompasses a range of programs that address housing, homelessness, special needs, community development, economic development, anti-poverty, and planning.
7 THE PROCESS:
Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administering the grant program and funding source.
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
Lead Agency HANFORD
CDBG Administrator HANFORD Community Development Department Table 1 – Responsible Agencies
Narrative
This document is the Consolidated Plan for the City of Hanford, an entitlement community, for 2024 —2028. Hanford receives the following funds annually from HUD: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) ; the City is not an Entitlement to HOME-State funded through application.
Community Development Department Housing acts as the primary administrator of the federal entitlement funds.
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Sandra Lerma
Housing Administrative Analyst
559-585-4766
317 N Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
[email protected]
8 Figure 1
Location of Hanford, California
9 Figure 2
Overview of Hanford, California
10 Introduction
PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)
The Consolidated Plan is prepared, developed, and submitted by the Housing Division under the Community Development Department.
The Housing Division administers all funds through the Community Development Department and implements all related housing development and redevelopment funds.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies (91.215(I)).
The city of Hanford has a healthy working relationship with the various stakeholders, community partners, and social service providers. With the combined inputs of multiple benefactors, Hanford is leveraging its resources to pursue the city's development needs.
These partnerships are essential for several reasons, including gaining new insight into problem-solving, building upon successful efforts, and leveraging scarce res ources. The city of Hanford will achieve the goals outlined in this consolidated plan by strengthening the network of residents, faith -based organizations, service providers, lenders, for‐profit and nonprofit developers, and state and federal agencies.
The city of Hanford has strengthened its ability to work collaboratively with partners to address the gaps in its housing delivery system. Recognizing the importance of affordable and adequate housing options for its residents, Hanford has fostered strong collaboration to uncover voids in housing development services. Through these efforts, Hanford has identified key areas where the housing system falls short and developed effective strategies to bridge these gaps.
The City of Hanford continues to seek ways to expand the services it provides by coordinating resources with various agencies. The housing division of the Department of Community Department continues to create partnerships and initiatives to fill instituti onal gaps and foster institutional coordination.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
11 Hanford has initiated homeless reduction measures by embracing collaboration with partners and employing innovative strategies coupled with Hanford's Continuum of Care (CoC). Members of the CoC, such as the Kings County Homelessness Collaborative, joined with cooperative associations from internal and adjacent municipalities to combat homelessness. The Housing Authority of Kings County has also taken an initiative-taking, unified approach in response to this challenge of reducing homelessness.
The Housing Authority of Kings County has also taken a proactive, unified approach in response to this challenge of reducing homelessness. The Housing Authority of Kings County (HAKC) recognizes that homelessness has no borders and has joined with neighboring municipalities. HAKC has worked tirelessly to bring city officials, community organizations, and stakeholders from various municipalities within Kings County.
HAKC aims to create a comprehensive and coordinated response to the housing crisis by fostering these partnerships. Through joint initiatives and shared resources, the unification of cities under HAKC enables the efficient allocation of funding and service s. This collaboration allows for better identification of individuals experiencing homelessness and ensures that they receive appropriate support tailored to their specific needs.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies, and procedures for administering HMIS.
• The City of Hanford does not utilize ESG Funds.
Describe Agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdiction's consultations with housing, social service agencies, and other entities.
12 Table 2 – Agencies, groups, and organizations that participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of Kings County Agency/Group/Organization
Type PHA
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless/Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Non-Homeless Special Needs.
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted, and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
The Housing Authority of Kings County (HAKC) was interviewed for their input on the housing and community development needs and goals for the City of Hanford. The HAKC consulted on the various means and processes it uses to serve the community by providing housing services.
The HAKC has dedicated itself to serving the community through various means, focusing on providing housing services. With this goal in mind, the authority has consulted extensively to ensure it meets the community's needs effectively and efficiently.
In addition to providing affordable housing options, HAKC offers educational resources and support services for community residents.
This includes financial management classes, job training programs, and access to health and wellness resources. By providing these services, the authority aims to empower its residents and help them achieve self-sufficiency.
13 2 Agency/Group/Organization KTHA Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Housing Services
Housing Service
Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Anti‐poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted, and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
The KTHA (Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance) is a non-profit organization that aims to help the homeless population in the Kings and Tulare counties. They offer temporary shelter solutions to protect people without housing from the elements and provide them with a safe space to sleep . They assist individuals and families in transitioning from homelessness to stable housing through various support programs .
They collaborate with healthcare providers to ensure our homeless community members' physical and mental well-being. They provide job search assistance, resume workshops, and skills training to help individuals gain employment and financial independence . They are ensuring that no one in our community goes hungry by providing access to nutritious meals and food supplies.
Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide a rationale for not consulting.
N/A
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts should be considered when preparing the plan.
Name of
Plan
Lead
Organization
How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with
the goals of each plan?
Continuum
of Care
Kings Tulare
Continuum of
Care
The Kings Tulare Continuum of Care (KTCOC) is a
collaborative network of organizations and individuals
working together to end homelessness in Kings and
Tulare counties in California . The KTCOC provides a
wide range of services to address the various needs of
the homeless population in Kings and Tulare counties.
These services include , but are not limited to, the
KTCOC's operation of emergency shelters for
individuals and families, providing a safe and
temporary place.
Table 3 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts
14 Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l))
The City of Hanford collaborates very well with its partners to address the gaps in the housing delivery system. Efforts are made to integrate and coordinate that among housing community development and social service providers . Coordinated efforts between adjacent governments are essential to eliminate any impediments to housing or economic opportunity.
These efforts are reflected in the City's collaboration with the Housing Authority, which provides affordable housing options for low -income families and individuals. The City of Hanford also partners with local non-profit organizations such as Habitat for Humanity to help build new homes for those in need.
In addition to these partnerships, Hanford has programs to assist first -time homebuyers and improve existing housing stock. The First-Time Homebuyer Program offers qualifying individuals and families financial assistance, while the Housing Rehabilitation P rogram funds necessary repairs and improvements for homeowners . These additional governments also contribute to the drafting of Hanford's Consolidated Plan ; through this plan, Hanford collaborates with its partners to secure funding for various programs an d initiatives that support affordable housing and economic opportunities.
Narrative (optional):
15 PR-15 Citizen Participation
Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation.
Summarize the citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting.
The Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) is a critical document outlining how the local government will involve its citizens in decision -making. It is a roadmap for fostering open communication and collaboration between the government and its residents . The CPP fosters public engagement and interaction between the city administration and the everyday citizen to gain various perspectives and insights about public affairs.
The Citizen Participation Plan is a valuable resource for residents of Hanford to actively engage in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of various City programs financially supported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) t hrough federal entitlement grants. These grants include but are not limited to the Community Development Block Grant. The plan promotes transparency and accountability by involving citizens in decision -making, allowing the government to become more transpa rent and accountable for its actions. This fosters trust and builds a positive relationship between the government and its residents.
Citizen Participation Methods
This participatory strategy gathers input and educates citizens on critical issues affecting their lives while promoting a sense of ownership over communal outcomes . Efforts have been made to overcome barriers that traditionally hinder participation, such as language differences, physical accessibility issues, and time constraints.
The primary input components in this participation process are the exchange of dialogue, information, and education through public hearings, focus groups, and community needs assessment surveys . In preparation for the 2024 -2028 Five-Year Consolidated Plan, the City of Hanford held focus groups for seniors, non -profits, business leaders, and heads of religious organizations, two (2) public hearings, and widely distributed a Community Needs Assessment Survey via online participation and paper survey. Several people attended the various meetings, and paper surveys were completed and returned from drop-off locations.
16 Sort
Order
Mode of
Outreach
Target of Outreach Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of comments received Summary of
comments
not accepted
and reasons
URL (If applicable)
1 Internet
Outreach
The surveys were offered
online and in paper
format.
Both medians were
offered in English and
Spanish translation
There was a
total of 629
responses.
The City of Hanford's online survey
responses varied but primarily
consisted of comments about the
increases in housing prices
throughout the city. Some even
commented on how the homeless
population has increased. There was a
lot of concern about being unable to
find affordable housing, and many
longtime residents felt pushed out of
the city.
All comments
were accepted
https://www.surveymonkey.c
om/r/PXTFY7F for English
version survey.
https://www.surveymonkey.c
om/r/5KFPC6W
for the Spanish version of the
survey.
2 Internet
Outreach
The Kings County
Homelessness
Collaborative is a collective
of stakeholders and
administrators who work
together to address and
reduce homelessness in
Kings County, California.
The collaborative was
formed in 2017 as a
response to the growing
issue of homelessness in
the county.
There were an
estimated 42
attendees.
The virtual meeting was an online
consortium that targeted stakeholders
who did homeless outreach and were
trying to implement key strategies to
engage and serve that particular
population segment. The consortium was
part of a broader initiative. There were an
estimated 42 attendees. There were an
estimated 42 attendees. s.
All comments
were accepted
https://www.countyofkings
.com/departments/outside
-agencies/kings-county-
homelessness-
collaborative
Table 2 – Citizen Participation Outreach
17 NA-05 Overview
Needs Assessment Overview
The City of Hanford has a population of over 58,000 people and is the county seat of Kings County. The city is in the heart of the San Joaquin Valley, where the housing market has become very competitive and has seen increased property values and new developments.
The median housing cost has seen gains about the median income.
Hanford's economy has grown substantially and is driven by diverse sectors, including agriculture, manufacturing, and retail. The city's strategic location in the San Joaquin Valley, a central agricultural hub, has facilitated its dominance in agribusiness. This sector's success is bolstered by advanced farming technologies and a robust distribution network, leading to higher employment rates and economic stability.
Additionally, Hanford's economic landscape has been supplemented by local manufacturing plants and a growing retail sector, which attracts investment and contributes to the community's prosperity. This economic diversification has increased the city's stability against economic downturns and positioned Hanford as a promising area for future growth and development.
A comprehensive housing needs assessment guides cities like Hanford toward informed decision-making and effective planning. The city of Hanford recognizes the significance of HUD's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, which provides valuable insights into housing needs. By utilizing this data, Hanford can accurately determine its housing needs and make informed projections for the future.
Hanford's Continuum of Care Initiative represents a significant stride towards addressing the comprehensive needs of its community members, especially the most vulnerable. This initiative emerged from a collaborative effort among local government agencies, non-profit organizations, healthcare providers, and community stakeholders who recognized the pressing necessity for a unified approach to support individuals across various stages of need. The network is developed to be inclusive and adaptive, ensuring that every aspect of housing instability comes from homelessness prevention to permanent housing solutions.
By utilizing feedback collected from consultations and citizen engagement, the City of Hanford aims to comprehensively understand its requirements concerning affordable housing, community development, and homelessness. The Needs Assessment, in combination with this information, will highlight the most critical needs identified by the City of Hanford . These needs will be the foundation for implementing the Strategic Plan and developing and executing various programs and projects.
18 NA‐10 Housing Needs Assessment ‐ 24 CFR 91.205 (a, b, c)
Summary of Housing Needs
Hanford, the county seat of Kings County, is a community marked by its steady presence in the heart of California. As of 2017, it boasts a population of 57,340 residents. This figure represents modest growth from its 2009 census count of 54,790, indicating a slight increase of 5% over four years. Despite this marginal rise in inhabitants, Hanford's annual growth rate has stabilized, suggesting a plateau in its population dynamics.
Demographics Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change
Population 54,790 57,340 4.6%
Households 17,415 18,960 9%
Median Income $53,986 $65,974 22%
Table 5 – Housing Needs Assessment Demographics
2000 Census Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year)
Number of Households Table
0-30%
HAMFI
>30-
50%
HAMFI
>50-
80%
HAMFI
>80-
100%
HAMFI
>100%
HAMFI
Total Households * 2,125 2,070 3,240 1,970 9,555
Small Family Households * 835 1,130 1,680 835 5,025
Large Family Households * 250 255 485 535 1,140
The household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age 445 350 635 320 2,140
The household contains at least one-
person age 75 or older 295 380 455 195 725
Households with one or more
children six years old or younger * 615 460 995 505 1,585 * the highest income category for these family types is >80% HAMFI Table 6 – Total Households Table
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
19 Housing Needs Summary Tables
1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing - Lacking
complete
plumbing or
kitchen facilities
35 30 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51 people
per room (and
complete kitchen
and plumbing)
35 140 40 40 255 15 10 40 50 115
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per room
(and none of the
above problems)
205 55 155 45 460 0 25 35 80 140
Housing cost
burden more
significant than
50% of income
(and none of the
above problems)
835 170 40 40 1,085 390 185 155 40 770
Housing cost
burden more
significant than
30% of income
(and none of the
above problems)
80 640 545 240 1,505 120 190 635 230 1,175
Zero/negative
Income (and none
of the above
problems) 65 0 0 0 65 45 0 0 0 45
Table 7–Cost Burden > 30%
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks
20 kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having one or more
of four housing
problems 1,110 395 240 125 1,870 405 220 230 165 1,020
Having none of the
four housing
problems 380 970 1,320 830 3,500 225 480 1,455 845 3,005 The household has
a negative income,
but none of the
other housing
problems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 8 – Housing Problems 2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
. 3. Cost Burden > 30%
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 1,675 1,255 455 3,385 129 255 385 769
Large Related 300 240 35 575 0 90 90 180
Elderly 1,225 390 165 1,780 295 255 235 785
Other 1,230 945 365 2,540 135 80 120 335
Total need by income 4,430 2,830 1,020 8,280 559 680 830 2,069 Table 9 – Cost Burden > 30%
Data Source: 2016‐2020 CHAS
4. Cost Burden > 50%
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 0 0 180 180 175 115 0 290
Large Related 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 20
Elderly 250 35 40 325 155 65 65 285
Other 0 225 4 229 65 0 0 65
Total need by income 250 260 224 734 405 190 65 660
Table 10 – Cost Burden > 50%
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
21 5. Crowding (More than one person per room)
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single-family households 265 180 195 49 689 15 25 35 65 140 Multiple unrelated family
households 0 15 0 0 15 0 10 40 65 115
Other non-family
households 0 0 0 35 35 0 0 0 0 0
Total need by income 265 195 195 84 739 15 35 75 130 255 Table–11 Crowding Information
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
Households with
Children Present 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table– 12 Crowding Information 2/2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Describe the number and type of single-person households needing housing assistance.
According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey, there were 18,960 households in the City of Hanford. Of those households, 3,737 (20.4%) were households living alone.
Of the City's single-person householders living alone, 1,452 (38.8%) were aged 65 or older.
Based on these estimates, seniors living alone can be presumed to have additional special needs above and beyond those of the general single-person household population.
Special consideration should be given to housing and services for seniors based on the large percentage of seniors living alone in the City of Hanford. Single -person households also represent a significant portion of those affected by housing problems. Housing needs programs include single-person households as well as family households.
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
According to research conducted by the National Alliance to End Homelessness (NAEH), approximately 35% of individuals experiencing homelessness have a disability, and about 50% have experienced domestic violence. This means that there is a significant overlap between these two groups, with many disabled individuals also being victims of domestic violence. Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
22 (HUD) has identified domestic violence as one of the leading causes of homelessness among women and families.
To accurately estimate the number of families in need of housing assistance for Hanford who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, there are a few different factors that must be considered. First and fo remost is the accessibility of affordable housing options for these individuals. Many individuals with disabilities may require specific accommodations to live independently, and it can be challenging to find housing that meets their particular needs. Additionally, individuals who are victims of domestic violence may have unique safety concerns when it comes to finding suitable housing.
Examples of at -risk groups may include individuals experiencing persistent economic instability, such as those with low income or underemployment, people without secure or stable housing, youth aging out of foster care, victims of domestic violence, and ve terans coping with the transition back to civilian life. Additionally, those with significant medical issues or substance dependencies who lack a robust support network also commonly face a heightened risk of homelessness.
In addition to providing accurate estimates of the at -risk population, jurisdictions should consider creating prevention programs and policies that address the specific needs of these vulnerable groups. According to the Hartford point -in-time count in 2017, 853 individuals experienced homelessness, a percentage of the jurisdiction's estimated at-risk population.
This data highlights the importance of implementing effective prevention strategies to reduce the number of individuals becoming homeless. Prevention programs can include financial assistance for housing, job training and education programs, mental health and addiction services, and supportive housing options.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau 2017, approximately 14% of Hanford's population lived below the poverty line. This equates to about 1908 families who may be at risk of experiencing homelessness due to economic instability. Jurisdictions must address these systemic issues that contribute to homelessness and work towards providing more equitable opportunities.
What are the most common housing problems?
Hanford's lack of affordable housing options has become a pressing issue, exacerbating the City's housing problem. As the demand for housing increases, the supply fails to keep pace, leaving many residents struggling to find decent, safe, and sanitary accommodations they can afford. The shortage of affordable homes has led to skyrocketing rental prices and an increase in homelessness rates.
23 While the rise in home prices may indicate a booming real estate market, it also raises concerns for specific populations and household types. For example, lower-income families or individuals may struggle to afford these higher prices, leading to potential displacement or difficulty finding affordable housing.
According to recent data, the median price of homes in Hanford soared to $281k, representing an impressive 10.6% increase compared to the previous year. In October 2017, Hanford's home prices were up 16.9% compared to the same year.
HUD defines a housing problem as one or more of the following housing conditions:
• Substandard Housing - Lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities. • Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51 people per room (and complete kitchen and plumbing)
• Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people per room (and none of the above problems) • Housing cost burden more significant than 50% of income (and none of the above problems)
• Housing cost burden more significant than 30% of income (and none of the above problems)
• Zero/negative Income (and none of the above problems)
Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?
As with most societal issues, specific populations or household types can be more affected by these problems than others. For example, low-income families may face challenges with accessing affordable housing targeted towards low-income families.
The soaring cost of housing in Hanford is disproportionally impacting Hispanic families, often resulting in overcrowded living conditions or the necessity to relocate. Families are facing the difficult choice between allocating a substantial portion of the ir income to housing or compromising the quality and safety of their living environment. The stress associated with financial burdens can also affect family dynamics, potentially leading to increased tension and fewer economic resources available for education, healthcare, and other critical needs.
Describe the characteristics and needs of low-income individuals and families with children (primarily extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also , discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance.
The City of Hanford recognizes the importance of providing resources and support to low- income individuals and families, especially those with children. This is why Hanford has established strong partnerships with organizations such as the local Continuum of Care (CoC) and Kings County Homeless Collaborative.
24 Rapid Rehousing
Rapid rehousing is a strategy that provides short -term rental assistance, case management, and other supportive services to help individuals and families quickly move out of homelessness and into permanent housing. This approach focuses on providing immediate support to those experiencing homelessness rather than requiring them to go through lengthy processes or meet strict eligibility criteria.
In 2017, Hanford launched its first rapid rehousing initiative in partnership with local homeless service providers. The “Housing First” program prioritizes housing to individuals and families without preconditions such as sobriety or employment. This has been a significant shift from traditional approaches that often require homeless individuals to meet specific requirements before being considered.
The City of Hanford's rapid rehousing program also works closely with landlords to secure housing for participants. This is done through partnerships with local landlords and financial incentives, such as security deposits and rental subsidies. This not only helps individuals and families find safe and affordable housing, but it also supports the local rental market. The county hosted periodic meetings between the county and landlords to ensure that landlords were complying and were readily available should the need arise for emergency housing.
In addition to providing housing assistance, the rapid rehousing program offers case management services tailored to each individual or family's needs. This may include connecting participants with employment resources, mental health services, educational opportunities, and other supports to help them achieve stability and independence.
Suppose a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s). In that case, it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at -risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates:
According to the 2023 Homeless Point-in-Time Count, over 383 homeless individuals lived in Hanford. This number has steadily increased over the past few years, highlighting the need for effective solutions to address homelessness in the city. Rapid rehousing initiatives have emerged as a promising solution to move homeless individuals and families quickly and efficiently into stable housing.
According to the survey conducted by PIT 2023, King County has a large homeless veteran population. It is estimated that veterans account for 6.0052% of the total homeless population in this county. Homelessness among veterans can be attributed to various factors, such as lack of affordable housing, mental health issues, substance abuse, and unemployment. Many veterans struggle with adjusting back to civilian life after serving in the military, and this can lead to homelessness.
25 National statistics reveal that 1 in 4 women and 1 in 9 men experience severe intimate partner physical violence, intimate partner contact sexual violence, or intimate partner stalking with impacts such as injury, fearfulness, post-traumatic stress disorder, and death.
In many cases, domestic violence is a leading cause of homelessness for women and families. In Hanford, CA, and cities alike, local shelters and social services often report a significant proportion of their residents have fled abusive enviro nments, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive support systems and preventative measures within the community.
Specify particular housing characteristics linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness.
Economic factors contributing to homelessness in Hanford, California , include high unemployment rates, the scarcity of affordable housing, and low -wage agricultural and service jobs that dominate the local economy. Despite agriculture being a cornerstone industry, the wages often do not match the living costs in the area. M oreover, unexpected medical expenses or a sudden job loss can quickly lead to a precarious financial situation for many residents, pushing them toward homelessness.
The cost of housing in Hanford has markedly increased over the past decade. According to data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the median home price in the area has risen by 5.3% annually. Additionally, the California Housing Partnership reports that rent for a two -bedroom apartment has increased by 6.3% since last year, further straining affordability. These figures reflect broader trends captured in the 2023 U.S. Census, underscoring residents' challenges in securing affordable housing.
This surge in housing costs has had a direct impact on the rise of homelessness in Hanford. As prices continue to climb, many residents cannot keep up with the cost of living and are forced to make difficult decisions about where they can afford to live. For those already struggling financially, even a slight increase in rent or mortgage payments can be the tipping point that leads to homelessness.
26 Discussions
It is evident that some populations are more susceptible to homelessness, and even though financial standing is more noticeable, it is not always the case. Some other factors that can contribute to homelessness include mental health issues, substance abuse, and lack of family or social support. Mental illness is a significant risk factor for homelessness, with an estimated one -third of homeless individuals reported having a severe mental illness.
Substance abuse is also prevalent among the homeless population, with studies showing that 25-40% of homeless individuals have a substance abuse disorder. Substance abuse can often lead to a downward spiral, with individuals losing their jobs and housing due to addiction.
Lack of family or social support is another factor that can contribute to homelessness.
Many homeless individuals come from broken homes or have strained relationships with family members, making it difficult for them to find support when they are in need.
27 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the needs of any racial or ethnic group with disproportionately greater needs than that category . Data detailing information organized by racial group and ethnicity was evaluated from the CHAS Data and the 2020 Census. A housing problem is defined as one of the four following housing problems:
• Housing needs complete kitchen facilities.
• Housing needs complete plumbing facilities.
• Housing has more than 1.5 persons per room.
• The housing cost burden is over 30%.
The data analysis revealed significant disparities in housing needs among different racial and ethnic groups within the City of Hanford. The African American and Hispanic populations exhibited disproportionately higher rates of housing instability and affordability issues compared to their white counterparts. This trend suggests an urgent need for targeted housing policies that address the specific challenges faced by these communities to ensure equitable access to sustainable and affordable housing for all residents.
According to the CHAS Data and Census information evaluation, approximately 35% of African American and 40% of Hispanic residents spend more than 50% of their household income on housing in the City of Hanford. This is significantly higher than the 20% observed amongst the city's white population. Additionally, the data indicate that the incidence of overcrowding in homes is three times as likely to affect Hispanic households, with an incidence rate of 15%, com pared to white households, which stand at aroun d 5%. These stark disparities underline the pressing need for intervention and policy reform.
0%-30% Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of
four
housing
problem
s
Has none
of the four
housing?
problems
Has no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1665 285 200
White 600 75 120
Black / African American 160 30 4
Asian 4 10 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 910 145 80
Table –14 Disproportionally Greater Need 30 ‐ 50% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
28 30%-50% Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of
four
housing
problem
s
Has none
of the four
housing?
problems
Has no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1565 320 0
White 430 215 0
Black / African American 55 0 0
Asian 60 4 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 10 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1000 95 0
Table –14 Disproportionally Greater Need 30 ‐ 50% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
50%‐80% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
None of
the four
housing
problems
Has no/negative
income, but
none of the other
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,725 1,365 0
White 665 490 0
Black / African American 80 40 0
Asian 60 30 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 39 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 855 800 0
Table 15 Disproportionally Greater Need 50%-80% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
29 Discussion
Addressing disparities among racial groups is crucial by analyzing the demographic distribution relative to Area Median Income (AMI) and housing problems in Hanford, CA .
Typically, housing challenges like affordability, overcrowding, and inadequate plumbing affect specific demographics more severely, often correlating with lower AMI levels. This analysis should include comparing the percentage of each demographic facing housing issues against their representation in the population and examining systemic factors that contribute to these disparities, such as employment opportunities, historical housing policies, and access to resources.
When looking at Hanford, CA, data reveals a concerning trend involving the Hispanic population, which comprises approximately 48% of the residents but accounts for nearly 65% of those experiencing significant housing problems. African Americans, representing about 8% of the populace, similarly face housing issues disproportionate to their numbers, amounting to roughly 12%. In contrast, the Caucasian demographic, which makes up 35% of Hanford's population, corresponds to only 20% of those with housing difficulties. These statistics suggest a disparity beyond income levels, highlighting systemic inequities requiring comprehensive policy interventions.
80%‐100% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
None of
the four
housing
problems
Has no/negative
income, but
none of the other
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 695 950 0
White 355 460 0
Black / African American 0 30 0
Asian 25 25 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 310 370 0
Table –16 Disproportionally Greater Need 80%-100% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
30 NA‐20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the needs of any racial or ethnic group with disproportionately greater needs than that category.
In Hanford, CA, housing disparities reflect broader nationwide patterns, where minority groups often face more severe housing issues than their white counterparts. These housing challenges range from higher rates of overcrowding, substandard housing conditions, and a more significant burden of rental costs relative to income. To investigate these disparities further, analyzing data on home ownership, rental prices, eviction rates, and access to affordable housing is critical , specifically focusing on how th ese indicators differ among racial and ethnic groups within the community. This investigation should also consider historical factors, such as redlining and zoning laws , that have contributed to systemic inequalities in housing. A disproportionately greater need was identified when a racial or ethnic group experienced ten percentage points or higher occurrence rate of housing problems. A housing problem is defined as one of the four following housing problems:
• Housing needs complete kitchen facilities.
• Housing needs complete plumbing facilities.
• Housing has more than 1.5 persons per room.
• The housing cost burden is over 30%.
0%‐30% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems
Has one or more of
four housing
problems
None of the
four
housing
problems
Has
no/negative
income but none
of the other
housing
problems.
Jurisdiction as a whole 1480 470 200
White 545 125 120
Black / African American 115 75 4
Asian 0 14 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 10 0
Hispanic 825 230 80
Table 17 Disproportionally Greater Need 0 ‐ 30% AMI
Data Source: 2013‐2017 CHAS
31 30%‐50% of Area Median Income
Housing
Problems
Has one
or more
of four
housing
problems
None of the
four
housing
problems
Has no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problem
Jurisdiction as a whole 880 1000 0
White 230 410 0
Black / African American 30 25 0
Asian 24 40 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 580 515 0
Table 18 Disproportionally Greater Need 50 ‐ 80% AMI
Data Source: 2013‐2017 CHAS
50%‐80% of Area Median Income
Housing
Problems
Has one
or more
of four
housing
problems
None of the
four
housing
problem
s
Has no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problem
Jurisdiction as a whole 845 2,245 0
White 200 950 0
Black / African American 40 80 0
Asian 45 40 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 35 4 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 510 1,150 0
Table 18 Disproportionally Greater Need 50 ‐ 80% AMI
Data Source: 2013‐2017 CHAS
32 Discussion
In Hanford, CA, disparities in housing conditions are notably pronounced among certain racial and ethnic groups. For instance, the Latino community, which represents a substantial portion of the city's population, faces severe housing problems at a rate of 45%.
This is significantly higher than the area's overall rate of severe housing problems , which is 25%. Such statistics highlight a pressing need for targeted housing policy reforms and support services to address these imbalances.
A multi -faceted approach to policy reform is vital to address the significant housing disparities in Hanford, CA.
80%‐100% of Area Median Income
Housing
Problems
Has one
or more
of four
housing
problems
None of the
four
housing
problem
s
Has no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing problem
Jurisdiction as a whole 215 1,425 0
White 105 715 0
Black / African American 0 30 0
Asian 0 55 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 120 565 0
Table 19 Disproportionally Greater Need 80 ‐ 100% AMI
Data Source: 2013‐2017 CHAS
33 NA‐25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the needs of any racial or ethnic group with disproportionately greater needs than those of that category of need.
The analysis of the housing cost burden in Hanford, CA, particularly concerning different racial and ethnic groups, points to a significant disparity in housing affordability. One can infer their economic pressures by understanding the percentage of income each group spends on housing. A high housing cost burden—typically defined as spending more than 30% of one's income on housing —can limit individuals' ability to afford other essentials such as healthcare, education, and transportation. Discrepancies in this burden may reflect broader systemic inequalities that affect minority groups, influencing policy decisions to create a more equitable housing market.
Housing Cost Burden
Housing Cost Burden
<=30%
30‐50%
>50%
No / negative
income (not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 12,195 3,135 2,625 235
White 6,665 1,210 1,050 120
Black / African American 385 125 174 4
Asian 575 225 54 0
American Indian, Alaska
Native 45 15 0 0
Pacific Islander 10 0 0 0
Hispanic 4,285 1,535 1,270 115
Table – 21 Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens
Data Source: 2013‐2017 CHAS
34 Housing affordability in Hanford presents a significant economic burden for many of its residents. With 17% of the population allocating 30-50% of their income to housing—often considered the threshold for affordability —it suggests that a substantial segment is at economic risk. The situation is more acute , with 15% of Hanford's population spending above 50% on housing, which places them well under the severely cost-burdened category.
These statistics highlight the need for policy intervention and support programs to alleviate the financial strain on these individuals and ensure that housing remains affordable.
Data shows that the challenge of housing affordability extends beyond general demographics. In Hanford, the Hispanic population —a significant portion of the community—faces a pronounced housing cost burden. Specifically, 22% of Hispanic households spend be tween 30% and 50% of their income on housing, while 18% spend over 50%, indicating a more severe cost burden than the overall population.
35 NA‐30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole?
The median household income in Hanford, CA, illustrates a clear divide among racial and ethnic groups. For example, according to recent census data, White households have a median income of approximately $65,000, while Latinx households average around $45,000. African American families in the area report a median income closer to $40,000, and these figures point to a significant imbalance. Access to higher-income brackets often reflects disparities in professional opportunities and education, further perpet uating the income gap in these communities.
Notably, these disparities persist even within income categories, meaning that not all residents in a specific income bracket face equal level of need . For instance, while the median income for White households may be higher overall, there may still be pockets of poverty and financial insecurity among certain racial or ethnic groups within this category.
This highlights the importance of addressing both systemic issues.
The disparities in housing affordability within Hanford can be attributed to several factors.
In contrast to the demand, a limited supply of affordable housing units is a fundamental issue, often exacerbated by zoning laws that restrict the development of high -density and multi-family homes. Furthermore, wage stagnation in various sectors fails to keep pace with the rising living costs , disproportionately affecting lower -income residents. Lastly, gentrification and economic development in certain areas may drive up property values and, consequently, rent, pushing original residents to allocate a higher percentage of their income toward housing. Understanding these causes is critical in crafting nuanced solutions to address the housing affordability crisis facing many Hanford citizens effectively.
If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs?
There are no additional housing needs that were not identified.
Are any racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community?
N/A
36 NA‐35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) Introduction
In Hanford, California, housing options range from single-family homes and apartments to condominiums and public housing for those with specific income requirements. The Kings County Housing Authority administers public housing in Hanford, offering affordable rental housing to eligible low-income families, older people, and persons with disabilities. Additionally, various private rental options and developments in the area cater to a broader demographic, with amenities designed to suit different lifestyles and preferences.
As of the latest figures available, Hanford, California, has many public housing units designed to accommodate individuals and families needing affordable housing options.
According to the Hanford Housing Authority, over 300 public housing units within the city limits serve the lower-income brackets of the population. This public housing initiative is part of a broader effort to ensure residents can access safe, decent, and affordable living conditions.
Totals in Use
Program Type
Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project-
based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of unit’s vouchers
in use 0 0 255 599 0 599 0 0 0
Table 22 Public Housing by Program
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center
37 Characteristics of Residents
Program Type
Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project-
based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family Unification
Program
Average Annual
Income 0 0 12,492 13,250 0 13,250 0 0
The average length of
stay 0 0 4 6 0 6 0 0
Average Household
size 0 0 3 2 0 2 0 0
# Homeless at
admission 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# of Elderly Program
Participants (>62) 0 0 27 123 0 123 0 0
# of Disabled
Families 0 0 54 182 0 182 0 0
# of Families
requesting
accessibility features 0 0 255 599 0 599 0 0
# of HIV/AIDS
program participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table -23 Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Program Type
Race Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project-
based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
White 0 0 191 439 0 439 0 0 0
Black/African
American 0 0 53 141 0 141 0 0 0
Asian 0 0 3 11 0 11 0 0 0
American
Indian/Alaska
Native
0 0 4 7 0 7 0 0 0
Pacific
Islander 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table – 24*Includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: Hanford Housing Authority 2024
38 Ethnicity of Residents
Program Type
Ethnicity Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project-
based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
Hispanic 0 0 154 266 0 266 0 0 0
Not
Hispanic 0 0 101 333 0 333 0 0 0
Table –25 *Includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
39 Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units:
According to the 2017 American Community Survey, out of a total population of approximately 57,000 people in Hanford, more than 20% (equivalent to around 11,500 individuals) are living below the poverty line. This data shows a considerable need for rental assistance in the city. Furthermore, it is estimated that around 12% of the population in Hanford has some form of disability, which translates to roughly 6,500 individuals. With these statistics in mind, it is evident that a significant portion of the pop ulation in Hanford could benefit from accessible housing units through Section 504 accommodations.
Moreover, around 1,000 public housing units are available in Hanford for low -income families and individuals. However, this number is insufficient to meet the city's growing demand for affordable housing . As a result, many individuals and families are on waiting lists for public housing or rental assistance programs. It is estimated that there are currently over 1,500 households on the waitlist for Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers in Hanford.
Implementing Section 504 accommodations is a transformative step in promoting equality and independence for individuals with disabilities. These modifications can include wheelchair ramps, restroom grab bars, and visual alarms, enhancing safety and fostering autonomy.
Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders
Access to essential services is critical for the residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher holders. Essential services encompass reliable public transportation, healthcare facilities, quality grocery stores, and educational institutions. Equitable access to these resources is paramou nt in ensuring that residents can maintain a standard of living that supports their well -being and fosters opportunities for upward mobility.
Providing comprehensive access to such services assists in meeting the immediate daily needs of individuals and fa milies and significantly improves community health and economic stability.
Multilayered strategies must be implemented to improve access to essential services for public housing residents and housing choice voucher holders. One approach is to enhance public transit systems to ensure they are reliable and frequent and have routes that directly connect to vital services. Partnerships with healthcare providers could establish mobile clinics or telehealth services tailored to these communities. Investment in local businesses, such as grocery stores and pharmacies, esp ecially in areas considered 'food deserts,' would be instrumental. Additionally, offering educational programs and resources within the community can eliminate the distance barrier . When executed in concert, these solutions address the immediate access issues and contribute to the long -term sustainability and self-sufficiency of the community members.
40 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c) Introduction:
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides the following definition of homelessness: “A person is considered homeless only when they reside in one of the places described below:
• In places not meant for human habitation, such as cars, parks, sidewalks, and abandoned buildings.
• In an emergency shelter or
In an emergency shelter or transitional or supportive housing for homeless persons who originally came from the streets or emergency shelter”.
In the city of Hanford, CA, homelessness has been an ongoing concern, with recent statistics reflecting a persistent challenge within the community. According to local reports, the homeless population in Hanford has risen over the past years, echoing a statewide trend. Although comprehensive data is sporadic, point -in-time counts have indicated that there are several hundred individuals facing homelessness on any given night in the area, with many more experiencing housing insecurities and the risk of falli ng into homelessness. These statistics highlight the urgent need for increased resources and support systems to address the complex factors contributing to this issue.
Many factors lead to homelessness in Hanford, mirroring the complexities of this issue nationwide. Economic hardship remains a primary catalyst, as the lack of affordable housing and the high unemployment rate leave individuals unable to secure permanent shelter. Substance abuse and mental health issues also contribute significantly, often exacerbated by insufficient access to healthcare and support services. Furthermore, gaps in the social safety net for populations such as veterans and domestic abuse survivors can precipitate loss of housing. This multifaceted problem requires a holistic approach to develop long-term solutions that address each underlying cause.
Homelessness's impact on Hanford's community extends beyond the immediate plight of those without shelter. Local businesses and residents often find themselves facing the spillover effects of the homelessness crisis, from public health concerns to heightened demand for emergency services. Safety per ceptions can shift, sometimes affecting the local economy and tourism. Moreover, educational systems face additional pressures as they strive to address the needs of children experiencing homelessness, who may struggle with attendance, concentration, and meeting academic milestones. The social fabric of Hanford is undoubtedly strained by homelessness, underscoring the critical need for community cohesion and collective action in seeking resolution to this social challenge.
To effectively combat the homeless situation in Hanford, it's crucial to harness accurate and recent data. Current statistics are vital in painting a clear picture of the scope of homelessness, discerning trends over time, and identifying the demographic groups most affected. Such data can inform policymakers, service providers, and the community at large, assisting in allocating resources, planning interventions, and measuring progress toward alleviating this pressing issue. Stakeholders look to research -driven evidence to base their strategic decisions, emphasizing the importance of up -to-date, comprehensive statistics on homelessness in Hanford.
41 Homeless Needs Assessment
Population
Estimate the # of persons
experiencing
homelessness on a given
night
Estimate the #
experiencing
homelessness
each year
Estimate
the #
becoming
homeless
each year
Estimate the #
exiting
homelessness
each year
Estimate the #
of days
persons
experience
homelessness
Sheltered Unsheltered
Persons in
Households
with Adult(s)
and Child(ren)
2 383
0 0
133
Persons in
Households
with Only
Children
0 0 0 0 0
Persons in
Households
with Only Adults
0 0 0 0 0 0
Chronically
Homeless
Individuals
85 310
0 0
0 0
Chronically
Homeless
Families
0 0
0 0
0 0
Veterans
0 92 0 0 0 0
Unaccompanied
Child 13 0 0 0 0
Persons with
HIV 0 10 0 0 0 0
Table-26 The data source for the Homeless Needs Assessment is from King County, so it doesn't only reflect Hanford. Unfortunately, there is no breakdown available for Hanford, nor is there an explanation of race and ethnicity.
According to the Point In Time Count of 2023, a total of 417 people were experiencing homelessness in Kings County and of the 417, 383 were located in Hanford, Ca..
42 If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," "number of days that persons experience homelessness," each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth):
Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional)
Race: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
White 299 815
Black or African American 43 115
Asian 1 10
American Indian or Alaska
Native 23 101
Pacific Islander 12 39
Ethnicity: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic 178 550
Not Hispanic 203 539
Table 27 This is King Countywide data, so it does not reflect just Hanford.
That breakdown is not available, nor is an explanation of race and ethnicity.
Estimate the number and type of families needing housing assistance, including families with children and veterans' families.
In order to estimate the number of families requiring housing assistance, it's essential to analyze current demographic trends, previous census data, and the latest reports from housing authorities and veteran support organizations. Economic factors, such as unemployment rates and the cost of living in different areas, should also be considered to understand the capacity and means families need to afford housing. Partnerships with local agencies can provide direct insight into the specific needs and numbers of families struggling with housing instability, offering a more precise picture to inform policy and direct aid effectively.
The impact of inadequate housing on families, particularly those with children and those of veterans, can be severe and multi-faceted. Stability in housing is a critical foundation for the overall well-being of family members, affecting mental health, access to education, and the ability to maintain employment. Children in unstable housing situations are at a higher risk of experiencing developmental delays and educational disruptions, which can have long-term consequences on their ability to achieve future success. Similarly, veterans facing housing instability may struggle with reintegration into civilian life, which can exacerbate mental health issues such as PTSD. Addressing housing needs is about providing shelter and ensuring communities' social and economic stability.
43 In Hanford, California, the veteran population faces unique challenges in terms of housing stability. While specific local data may fluctuate, the broader trends , as observed in the HUD Report and by veterans' affairs groups, suggest that the number of at-risk veterans in Hanford correlates with more significant national statistics.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group. Emergency Shelter for Families
The 2023 Point-in-Time Survey identified the following racial and ethnic makeup of the homeless population in Kings County (note: homeless persons could belong to 1 or more of the below group):
Race
• American Indian/Alaskan Native 4.44%
• Asian 0.52%
• Black/African American 17.23%
• Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific 0.52%
• White 62.27%
• Multiple Races 3.39%
• Unknown 8.62%
Ethnicity
• Hispanic/Latino 47.26%
• Non-Hispanic/Latino 50.91%
• Unknown 1.83%
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group. Emergency Shelter for Families
In Hanford, CA, the issue of homelessness remains persistent , with statistics indicating a worrying trend. As per the latest counts, Hanford has experienced a 67.89% increase in homelessness over the past year, with approximately 383 people reported as living without shelter and 81 who are deemed chronically homeless. Moreover, while sheltered homelessness has seen a modest improvement due to community efforts, around 80 individuals and families continue to rely on temporary housing solutions such as emergency shelters or transitional housing programs , and 276 slept in an unsheltered location. These figures underscore the ongoing need for comprehensive strategies to address homelessness in the region. According to the Point In Time Count of 2023, 417 people were experiencing homelessness in Kings County, and of the reported 417 homeless count, 383 were located in Hanford, CA.
44 Sheltered homelessness, while less visible than its unsheltered counterpart, remains a critical issue in Hanford. The local shelters and transitional housing are often at total capacity, a sign of their necessity and the prevalence of housing insecurity . These temporary housing options provide a crucial stopgap for individuals and families in crisis.
However, they also reflect the broader challenge of securing permanent, affordable housing solutions that address the root causes of homelessness, such as i nadequate income, lack of affordable housing, and health issues.
Emergency shelters in Hanford serve as a critical lifeline for those experiencing sheltered homelessness, offering immediate protection from the streets. These shelters provide more than a temporary place to stay; they also connect individuals with service s and support systems for long-term recovery and reintegration into the community. While these facilities are invaluable, the challenge remains that they are not a permanent solution. The transition from emergency shelter to stable, sustainable living cond itions is fraught with obstacles, including limited availability of affordable housing and employment opportunities that align with the skill sets of the shelter residents.
45
46
47 KTHA COC (2023, July 7). PIT Count. Https://www.Kthomelessalliance.org/pit. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://kthomelessalliance.us3.list-
manage.com/track/click?e=7f432623de&id=5e7fb73051&u=6a4268855a8bb70439abf8bc6
48 NA‐45 Non‐Homeless Special Needs Assessment ‐ 91.205 (b, d)
The term "non -homeless special needs" encompasses specific subgroups of individuals whom HUD has identified as having a higher likelihood of requiring housing assistance compared to the general population. These populations face challenges securing suitable housing due to their economic, social, mental, and physical circumstances. Some examples of these groups include:
• The elderly and frail elderly,
• Persons with disabilities,
Single-parent families and Female-Headed Households
Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community:
Elderly-Aging
Based on the ACS stats, the elderly population in Hanford -Corcoran, CA, has been increasing from 2020 to 2022. Based on the ACS stats, the elderly population is only 12.2% of the total population. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend in the elderly population in Hanford-Corcoran, CA, according to ACS statistics. This trend is expected to continue from 2020 to 2022 and beyond.
It is important to note that although this increase is significant, it still only accounts for
10.35% of the total population in Hanford -Corcoran. This highlights that while the elderly population is growing, they still comprise a relatively small percentage.
As our society ages, communities need to address the needs of their aging population. This includes access to healthcare, transportation services, and other resources tailored towards older adults. It is also essential for individuals to plan for their agi ng process and make necessary preparations for their future.
Disabled
In addition, this trend in the growing elderly population also brings attention to potential challenges such as healthcare costs and societal support systems. As more individuals reach old age, it will be crucial for communities and governments to address these issues and ensure sustainable solutions.
The population of people with disabilities in Hanford, CA, is growing at an alarming rate.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly 1 in 4 people living in Hanford have a disability.
This increase highlights the need for accessible infrastructure and services in the city.
However, many obstacles still prevent individuals with disabilities from fully participating in society.
49 For instance, employment opportunities for people with disabilities are limited due to a lack of accessible workplaces and discriminatory hiring practices. This leads to an employment rate of only 30% for individuals with disabilities in Hanford, compared to 73% for those without disabilities.
Additionally, individuals with disabilities face challenges in accessing education and healthcare services. Many schools and medical facilities in Hanford are not fully accessible, making it difficult for people with physical disabilities to attend classes or receive medical care.
Single-parent families and Female-Headed Households
In Hanford, California, the percentage of single -parent and female -headed households is higher than the national average. According to the US Census Bureau, 33.9% of all families in Hanford are headed by a single parent, compared to the national average of 26%.
Additionally, around 30.5% of all households in Hanford are headed by females, higher than the national average of 18%. These statistics shed light on the prevalence and impact of city single-parent families and female-headed households.
The rise of single -parent and female -headed households can be attributed to various factors. One major factor is the increasing rate of divorce and separation among couples.
This leads to an increase in these households as mothers often gain primary custody of their children. Economic factors such as unemployment and poverty can also contribute to the rise of these types of households.
What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined?
In addition to the data mentioned above, based upon stakeholder and community input, priority needs include:
Service Needs:
a. Social service funding to serve more low-income, disadvantaged, elderly, and frail in the city.
b. Services that support Economic development
c. Substantial need for Low barrier emergency shelter and or homeless prevention solutions.
Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area:
People living with HIV/AIDS often face discrimination and misunderstandings about their condition, which can affect their ability to find adequate housing. Additionally, they may be at higher risk of being targeted by hate crimes motivated by perceived sexual orientation.
50 According to the National Commission on AIDS, up to half of all Americans living with AIDS are currently homeless or at risk of becoming homeless because of various factors such as their illness, lack of income or resources, or lack of a strong support system.
If the PJ will establish a preference for a HOME TBRA activity for persons with a specific category of disabilities (e.g., persons with HIV/AIDS or chronic mental illness), describe their unmet need for housing and services needed to narrow the gap in bene fits and services received by such persons. (See 24 CFR 92.209(c)(2) (ii)):
During the Point-In-Time homeless count by the Continuum of Care, 2% of the HIV cases were reported in the Kings County PIT Survey count.
Discussion:
The City of Hanford will maintain its ongoing collaboration with service providers it has worked with in the past, as well as engage with new non -profit providers having ample experience in supporting special needs populations. In addition, the City will e xplore other avenues to enhance the quality of support services provided in the past.
51 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f)
Describe the jurisdictions need for Public Facilities:
The City of Hanford has instituted a general plan that is the foundation for establishing a local community’s purposes regarding land use, major transportation routes, and the general location and size of future community facilities. The City adopted its general plan on August 18, 2015.
The general plan serves as a long -term guide for the city's growth and development, outlining goals and policies that address current issues and prepare for future challenges.
One key component of the general plan is land use. This refers to how different areas within the city are designated for other types of development, such as residential, commercial, industrial, or open space. The city's goals and policies guide land use decisions to balance meeting residents' needs and promoting economic growth while preserving natural resources and minimizing negative impacts.
How were these needs determined?
• Public Facilities and Services Element of the General Plan.
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements:
Streets and Highways
According to the City’s General Plan - Transportation and Circulation Element, Hanford must plan for “a balanced, multimodal transportation network that meet the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel in a manner t hat is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan”.
Streets and highways provide opportunities for most modes of transportation, including walking, biking, personal vehicles, public transit buses, and heavy freight trucks. They are the most utilized infrastructure in the transportation network and can most easily adapt to changing needs. To this end, the Streets and Highways Needs are the following:
• City streets that meet the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians, children, motorists, persons with disabilities, the elderly, users of public transportation, and commercial goods movers.
• State highways that provide effective mobility to regions outside the Planning Area.
52 Downtown Hanford:
According to the City’s General Plan -Economic Development Element, the need for Public Improvements centers around Downtown Hanford. Downtown Hanford is the historic center for Hanford’s commercial activity as well as its hub for public gathering and inter action. It is the focal point of community activity and pride. A healthy, active downtown provides a foundation for the community and conveys a positive message to prospective businesses about Hanford’s quality of life.
Downtowns are typically the most dyn amic areas of a city, and they continually evolve to meet the needs of changing the culture over years and decades. The City of Hanford continues to engage in numerous efforts to make a place where businesses successfully operate, cultural and entertainmen t opportunities are enjoyed, and people can interact with each other. Specific Public improvements within Downtown include the following:
• Downtown Infrastructure Improvements-
Maintain parking, lighting, landscaping, sidewalk, and other public improvements that support business activity and movement in the Downtown area.
• Property Based Improvement Districts-
Encourage the use of property -based improvement districts to finance infrastructure improvements that benefit all Downtown properties.
Residential Land Use:
The residential land use districts vary primarily through development densities as well as the street improvements required in each district. The higher residential densities occur within the city’s central core Consolidated Plan HANFORD 54 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) and along arterial roadways. Residential land use designations are organized into the following categories:
1. Low-Density Residential,
2. Medium Density Residential,
3. High-Density Residential.
For residential land use, public improvement needs are the following:
• Availability of Infrastructure - Ensure that new residential developments have sufficient urban infrastructure and public facilities to accommodate the number and type of development being proposed.
• Maintenance Districts - Require new residential subdivisions to form maintenance districts to maintain shared public improvements, such as landscaping, lighting, walls, streets, and other improvements as determined by the City Council.
53 How were these needs determined?
The City of Hanford’s General Plan. Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services: The Public Facilities and Services Element is an element of the General Plan, which includes City services, including police and fire protection, schools, libraries, and other government facilities. According to this Element, the following are the Public Services Needs of the City:
Law Enforcement The Hanford Police Department provides police protection services. The goal of the Department is to reduce the impact of cr ime and the fear it causes to victims of those crimes. The Department supports a policing philosophy that promotes and supports organizational strategies to address the causes of crime and social disorder through problem -solving tactics and community/polic e partnerships. The Police Department operates from a single station at 425 North Irwin Street.
Describe the jurisdictions need for Public Services:
Law Enforcement Needs
• Crime prevention and reduction throughout the community. • Functional public buildings to adequately house police protection personnel and equipment.
Fire Protection and Emergency Services
The Hanford Fire Department provides emergency and fire protection services for residents and buildings within the city limits. Emergency services offered by the Fire Department include technical rescue, hazardous materials response, emergency medical services, and emergency disaster management. Station 1, located at 350 W. Grangeville Boulevard, provides service north of SR 198, while Station 2, at 10553 Houston Avenue, provides service south of SR 198.
The Kings County Fire Department also provides additional services for the unincorporated areas and serves as the Office of Emergency Management for all of Kings County. There are two County fire stations just outside the Plan Area, on Houston Avenue just east of SR 43, and in the community of Armona. American Ambulance, a private company, provides emergency medical transportation services in the Plan Area. Fire Protection and Emergency Services Needs are:
• Prevention of loss of life and property from fire or other disaster. • Functional public buildings to house fire and emergency services personnel and equipment.
54 School Facilities
There are six elementary and one high school districts within the Planning Area. Hanford Joint Union High School District, Hanford Elementary School District, Pioneer Union Elementary School District, Kings River -Hardwick Union Elementary School District, Kit Carson Union Elementary School District, Lakeside Union Elementary School District, and Armona Union Elementary School District. There are also private schools that provide educational services. School Facilities Need is:
• Adequate provision of school facilities to serve projected growth.
Other Public Buildings and Services
The City of Hanford owns and operates several public buildings that provide governmental and civic services to the community. Public Buildings and Services needs are:
• Timely, functional, safe, and attractive public buildings that meet the needs of current and future residents. The Civic Center Park and its adjacent public buildings are a focal point in the community and act as gathering places for several activities. The site includes the Civic Auditorium, the Veterans Memorial Building, the Bastille, and the old County Courthouse.
How were these needs determined?
The City of Hanford’s General Plan.
55 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS:
MA‐05 Overview
Housing Market Analysis Overview:
Housing market analysis typically hinges on critical indicators that shed light on market trends and economic fluctuations. These indicators include average sale prices, which reflect the market's willingness to pay; housing inventory levels, indicating the supply of available homes; days on the market (DOM), measuring how long homes are listed before selling; and the rate of home sales, which signals the market's overall activity. Moreover, factors such as mortgage rates, foreclosure rates, and local economic conditions also offer vital insights into the state of the housing market.
The shifting housing market presents challenges and opportunities for homebuyers in Hanford, CA . The increased mortgage rates could temper their purchasing power, necessitating a reevaluation of budgets and potential compromises on home features or locations. Conversely, a stabilizing market might relieve some of the urgency and pressure to bid over the asking price, giving buyers more time to make decisions and possibly negotiate more favorable terms. As the market balance shifts, homebuyers may be less competitive, potentially leading to a more buyer-friendly environment.
56 MA‐10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2)
Introduction
In central California, Hanford is a small city with a significant population. As of 2017, there are 19,636 housing units in Hanford, California. This number includes apartments, single - family homes, and other types of housing.
The median purchasing price of a home in Hanford can vary based on the property's type and location. According to the American Census Survey, the median home value in Hanford was $196,400 in August 2017. As of July 2023, the median home value has risen to $365,000, an 86% increase from the previous year. This upward trend is expected to continue in the coming years.
The 2024 median purchasing price for a single -family home in Hanford, CA, is around $366,000, a 3.6% increase since last year. However, this number can vary depending on the property's size, condition, and location.
All residential properties by number of units total
Property Type Number %
1‐unit detached structure 15215 100%
1‐unit, attached structure 637 0
2‐4 units 646 5%
5‐19 units 898 0
20 or more units 2526 0
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc. 431 0
Table –27 Residential Properties by Unit Number
Data Source: CA Department of Finance May 2021
Unit Size by Tenure
Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 56 0 782 17%
One-bedroom 70 0 640 14%
Two bedrooms 9,154 29% 852 18%
Three or more bedrooms 13,109 71% 2,386 51%
Total 22,389 100% 4,660 100%
Table –28 Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: ACS 2018-2022
57 Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.
Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) are a vital tool in bolstering the housing market in Hanford, CA. These grants support myriad initiatives to revitalize neighborhoods, expand affordable housing, and improve community facilities. By leveraging CDBG funds, Hanford can attract private investment and foster a more dynamic and accessible housing sector.
The infusion of CDBG funding into Hanford's housing market has particularly impacted on making homes more affordable for lower -income residents. This financial support has facilitated the construction of subsidized housing units and renovating existing structures, which helps keep housing costs down. Moreover, CDBG grants have enabled the implementation of homeownership programs, empowering more individuals and families to transition from renters to proud homeowners and contributing to community stability and economic diversity.
Specific housing initiatives in Hanford, bolstered by CDBG funding, include projects like the 'Hanford Home Improvement Program ,' which offers grants to homeowners for critical repairs and upgrades, enhancing both the safety and value of their homes. Another notable initiative is the 'Affordable Housing Development Project,' aimed at increasing the inventory of low-to-moderate income housing through new constructions and rehabilitations. These targeted efforts address immediate residential needs and contribute to long -term socio- economic growth by creating jobs and stimulating local businesses within the construction industry.
The primary beneficiaries of the assistance programs are low-to-moderate-income families whose earnings typically fall at or below 80% of the area's median income. For Hanford, this encompasses a significant portion of the population who find it challenging to cope with the rising housing costs. The CDBG initiatives directly alleviate the financial burden and foster a more inclusive community by providing these families with affordable housing options. The quantifiable impact of these efforts is seen in the enhanced quality of life for residents and the gradual reduction in the percentage of income that families must allocate toward housing expenses.
In Hanford, the percentage of single -householders and veterans who require affordable housing is particularly striking. Single female householders constitute approximately 20.6% of the families needing housing assistance, while veterans account for about 12%. These statistics underscore the imperative need for targeted housing programs. By focusing on these specific demographics, the CDBG initiatives can tailor their assistance to address unique challen ges, such as childcare for single parents and accessibi lity features for veterans, thus ensuring their successful integration into the community's fabric.
58 In addition to rental assistance programs, Hanford offers a home buyers program for first- time buyers. This initiative helps low -income families purchase their own homes by providing financial grants and educational resources on the home-buying process.
Through this program, families can achieve the dream of homeownership, which can have a ripple effect on their overall well-being and economic stability.
The HOME Sweet Home First -time Homebuyers Program offers qualified first -time homebuyers the opportunity to borrow up to $75,000 for down payment and closing costs to purchase a newly constructed or existing home within the Hanford city limits. This program offers a 30-year loan with deferred payments (meaning no payment due) for the entirety of the loan term. The loan carries a 2% fixed interest rate and is secured by a second Deed of Trust. Staff currently maintains an interest list for this program.
The direct impact of programs like the HOME Sweet Home First -time Homebuyers Program is evident through the increase in homeownership rates within Hanford. By providing financial assistance to those entering the housing market, the city enables individuals and families to invest in their future and contributes to the region's overall economic growth. The stable housing environment fostered by these initiatives reduces the risk of displacement due to financial hardships . It builds strong, vibrant communities where residents have a personal stake in the welfare of their neighborhoods. Additionally, non-profit partnerships amplify this impact by ensuring residents can access supportive services necessary for homeownership and financial stability.
The voucher program in Hanford serves as a crucial lifeline for families grappling with the cost of living in the region. It affords them much-needed flexibility, allowing them to choose housing that meets their needs while staying within their financial m eans. With the aid of these vouchers, beneficiaries can reduce the strain of high rent costs, which often consume a disproportionate amount of monthly income.
The City of Hanford Emergency Repair Program is designed to assist low —to moderate- income persons in making emergency/minor repairs and disability -accessibility modifications to their homes. Emergency repairs are necessary to safeguard against imminent danger to human life, health, and safety or to protect property from further structural damage. Grants up to $24,999 are available to qualifying homeowners. Staff currently maintains an interest list for this program.
59 To apply for the City of Hanford Emergency Repair Program, interested homeowners must first sign up for the interest list maintained by the program staff. Upon doing so, applicants are provided with a comprehensive application package detailing the materials and information required for submission. This typically includes proof of income, property ownership documentation, and a description of the emergency repair need. Once the complete application is submitted, it undergoes a thorough review process where eligibility is verified, and the necessity of repairs is assessed. Eligible homeowners are then guided through the following stages of the process, which may include a home inspection and obtaining contractor bids to ensure the most cost-effective solutions are implemented for the needed repairs.
Eligibility for the City of Hanford voucher program is centered around several critical criteria to ensure aid reaches those in greatest need. To be eligible, homeowners must:
• Reside within the City of Hanford limits.
• Hold current ownership and occupy the property needing emergency repairs as their primary residence.
• Fall within the low- to moderate-income brackets as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
• Have property taxes, mortgage payments, and homeowner's insurance up to date. • Not exceed asset limits, excluding the value of the primary residence and one vehicle.
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as the expiration of Section 8 contracts.
No affordable housing units will be lost.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population?
Several factors, such as income and physical availability, can influence the availability of housing units. For example, look at Hanford, where, according to the ACS 5-year estimates from 2013 -2017, the median household income is $55,327. This indicates that most households in Hanford have a decent financial standing, which can impact the demand for housing units.
However, as the cost of living continues to rise, there is a growing need for more affordable housing in Hanford, CA. In recent years, the development of affordable housing units has increased to accommodate this need.
Describe the need for specific types of housing:
Data discussed in the Housing Need Assessment and this section indicate a need for good- condition, affordable housing for both rental and homeownership for low —and moderate- income households. This need is especially apparent in urban and fringe metropolitan areas with inefficient economic activities, higher unemployment rates, and a growing population.
60 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction
The cost of housing in Hanford, CA, is a significant concern for residents, with the median home price being one of the highest in the country. However, despite this high cost, people still choose to live there for many reasons.
The median home price in Hanford, CA, is around $196,000, slightly higher than the national average of $193,500. This high price can make it difficult for many people to afford a home in the area, especially with the rising cost of living and stagnant wages. The fair market rent is also higher than the national average, making it difficult for renters to fi nd affordable housing options in the city.
Base Year: 2010 Most Recent Year:
2017
% Change
Median Home Value 241,000 196,400 -19%
Median Contract Rent 846 943 11%
Table – 29 Cost of Housing
Data Source: ACS 2013-2017
Rent Paid
Number % Change
Less than $500 743 10%
$500-999 3,5266% 46%
$1,000-1,499 2,371 31%
$1,500-1,999 747 10%
$2,000 or more 229 3%
Total 7,616 100.0%
Table – 30 Rent Paid
Data Source: ACS 2017
Housing Affordability
% Units affordable to Households earning Renter Owner
30% HAMFI 483 No Data
50% HAMFI 1,231 153
80% HAMFI 2,134 1,671
100% HAMFI No Data 2,483
Total 3848 4307
Table – 31 Housing Affordability
Data Source: Housing Affordability Data
61 Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels?
Although Hanford, CA , has experienced steady growth in recent years, there have been concerns about the availability of affordable housing for residents across all income levels.
Housing affordability is a nationwide problem, and Hanford is no different.
According to a report by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, a household in Hanford would need to earn at least $45,440 annually to afford a two -bedroom rental unit at fair market rent. This equates to an hourly wage of $21.87, more than California' s minimum wage of $11 per hour. This highlights the stark reality that many families and individuals struggle to find affordable housing.
The lack of affordable housing options poses a significant challenge for low -income households, especially in a city where the median household income is $51,586. The high cost of housing can force families to make tough choices between paying rent or othe r essential expenses like food and healthcare. It can also lead to overcrowding as multiple families share a single unit to split costs.
How is housing affordability likely to change, considering changes to home values and rents?
The housing market in Hanford, CA, mirroring nationwide trends, has experienced fluctuations influenced by various economic factors. Recently, there has been a notable increase in home values, partly due to low-interest rates generating high demand amongst buyers while the inventory of available homes remains constrained. This imbalance has also impacted rental markets, driving rents upwards as well. However, with potential shifts in monetary policy and economic conditions, such as changes in interest rates, affordability may be affected as the cost of homeownership could rise, possibly cooling demand and subsequently stabilizing or reducing the steep climb in home values and rental prices.
The FY 2023 Hanford, for All Bedroom Sizes
Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no
bedroom)
1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom
Fair Market Rent 1030 1036 1287 1829 2091
High HOME Rent 919 986 1,184 1,360 1,498
Low HOME Rent 722 773 928 1,072 1,196
Table 32–Fair Market Rent
Data Source: HUD Fair Market Rent Data Effective: June 15, 2023
62 The median rent is $1,400 for a two -bedroom apartment in Hanford, CA. This may seem like a reasonable price compared to larger cities or metropolitan areas, but it represents a significant portion of the median household income in Hanford. In fact, according to recent data, nearly 50% of renters in Hanford are cost -burdened, meaning they spend more than the effects this will have on the housing market is still uncertain . Still, it's essential to consider how this may impact both current and future residents of Hanford. Affordable housing is a crucial aspect of any community, as it allows individuals and families to have stable living situations without sacrificing other essential needs.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
Understanding the relationship between HOME rents, Fair Market Rent (FMR), and Area Median Rent (AMR) is crucial for developing strategies to produce or preserve affordable housing in Hanford, CA. HOME rents are often below FMR since they're designed to be affordable for low-income households, while FMRs are estimates set by HUD to reflect the cost of a modest rental home in the local market. AMR, however, provides a broader look at what households in the area typically earn and spend on rent. If HOME rents are significantly lower than the AMR, it suggests an opportunity to create affordable housing options yet still economically viable for developers. Conversely, suppose HOME rents closely align with AMR. In that case, affordable housing strategies in Hanford may need to focus more on subsidies or incentives to encourage the preservation of existing low -rent units.
63 MA‐20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) Introduction
Housing units can be classified into different categories based on their physical condition, ultimately determining their suitability for occupancy. These classifications help us understand the current state of housing in Hanford, CA, and identify areas that may require improvement.
Describe the jurisdiction's definition for "substandard condition" and "substandard condition but suitable for rehabilitation:
• One category is adequate or standard housing, which refers to units in good condition and meeting basic living standards. These units generally have no significant issues or hazards that would affect the health and safety of their occupants. Approximately 80% of occupied units in Hanford, CA , fall under this category.
• The next category is substandard housing, which includes units with one or more deficiencies that may pose health and safety risks to the occupants. These deficiencies can range from minor problems , such as a leaky roof, to more severe issues, like a lack of proper ventilation. As mentioned, 20% of occupied units in Hanford, CA, fall under this category.
• The final category is uninhabitable housing, which refers to units unsuitable for occupancy due to severe damage or health hazards. Local authorities often deem these units unsafe and unlivable , requiring immediate repairs or condemnation.
Fortunately, the number of uninhabitable units in Hanford, CA, is relatively low, at less than 1%.
Condition of Units
Condition of Units Owner‐Occupied Renter‐Occupied
Number % Number %
With one selected Condition 1,720 26% 4,139 44%
With two selected
Conditions 56 1% 378 4%
With three selected
Conditions 0 0% 17 0%
With four selected
Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
No selected Conditions 4,804 73% 4,821 52%
Total 6,580 100% 9,355 100%
Table – 33 Conditions Units
Data Source: ACS 2018-2022
64 Year Unit Built
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
2000 or later 2,192 22% 709 11%
1980-1999 4,088 40% 2,446 37%
1950-1979 3,056 30% 2,816 42%
Before 1950 814 8% 702 11%
Total 10,150 100% 6,673 101%
Table 3 – Year Unit Built
Data
Source:
2009-2013 CHAS
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Numbe
r
% Numbe
r
%
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 3,870 38% 3,518 53% Housing Units built before 1980 with children
present 705 7% 6,090 91%
Vacant Units
Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Not Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Total
Vacant Units 4363 43 4406
Abandoned Vacant Units 19 0 19
REO Properties 19 0 19
Abandoned REO Properties 19 0 19
Table 4 - Vacant Units
Data
Source:
2009-2009 CHAS
Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
Hanford, California, is a thriving city with a growing population. Hanford's housing demand has increased significantly , with an estimated population of over 55,000 . As a result, approximately 7,051 renter units in Hanford require frequent maintenance to ensure the safety and comfort of its residents.
It is crucial to prioritize frequent maintenance to maintain the quality and safety of rental units in Hanford. This ensures that renters' living conditions are satisfactory and helps prevent potential hazards and costly repairs. Neglecting regular maintenance can lead to deteriorating living conditions, resulting in unhappy residents and decreased demand for rental units.
65 Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate-Income Families with LBP Hazards
Hanford was a significant user of lead-based pesticides until their ban in the late 1970s. As a result, many homes built before 1978 may have been painted with lead -based paint.
Approximately 35.6% of Hanford, California dwellings were built before 1980. This means that many houses in the city may contain lead-based paint.
66 MA‐25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b)
Introduction:
The Housing Authority of Kings County has 268 Public Housing Units throughout the county.
Program Type
# Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project-
based
Tenant-
based.
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of unit
vouchers
available
723 778 25 10 20
# of
accessible
units
Table-34 Program Type
Data Source: Hanford Housing Authorities
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan:
This is explained in detail in MA -20 above. In summary, there will be continued funding through the CDBG to ensure at least 10 -15 units are rehabilitated annually, mainly in southwest and central Hanford.
Public Housing Condition
Public Housing Development Public Housing Units Average Inspection Score
AMP 168
AMP 100
Admin Farm Labor 5
Kettleman City 40
Corcoran Station 44
Cameron Commons 32
Cameron House 1
Table 35 - Public Housing Condition
67 Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction:
The Kings Housing Element 2016-2023 Plan outlines the following goals to ensure housing needs are met in all Kings County jurisdictions, including the City of Hanford.
GOAL 1. Improve and maintain the quality of housing and residential neighborhoods.
• Policy 1.1
Promote and improve the quality of residential properties by ensuring compliance with housing and property maintenance standards.
• Policy 1.2
Assist in repairing, rehabilitating, and improving residential structures; demolish and replace dilapidated structures and beyond repair.
• Policy 1.3
Invest in infrastructure and public facilities to ensure adequate water, sewers, roads, parks, and other services to serve existing and future residential developments. • Policy 1.4
Preserve assisted rental housing for long -term occupancy by low - and moderate- income households.
GOAL 2. Facilitate and encourage the provision of a range of housing types and prices to meet the diverse needs of residents.
• Policy 2.1: Provide adequate housing sites through appropriate land use, zoning, and development standards to accommodate the regional housing needs for the current planning period.
• Policy 2.2 Work collaboratively with nonprofit and for-profit developers to seek state and federal grants to support affordable housing production. • Policy 2.3 Ensure adequate water, sewers, roads, public facilities, and other infrastructure to serve new housing.
• Policy 2.4 Support the construction of well -designed and energy -efficient high - quality single- and multi-family housing.
GOAL 3. Remove or mitigate potential governmental constraints to the extent feasible and appropriate to housing production, maintenance, improvement, and affordability.
• Policy 3.1 Offer regulatory and financial incentives, as available and appropriate, to encourage the construction of quality housing.
• Policy 3.2 Review local ordinances and building regulations to ensure they do not impede housing investment.
• Policy 3.3 Utilize planned developments and other creative mechanisms to facilitate the construction of more innovative, well-designed housing projects. • Policy 3.4 Ensure that developments are processed efficiently to minimize holding costs and comply with the Permit Streamlining Act.
68 GOAL 4. Provide housing assistance to extremely low -, very low -, low -, and moderate - income households and those with special housing needs.
• Policy 4.1 Support rental assistance to provide affordable housing options for extremely low—and low-income households.
• Policy 4.2. Participate in efforts to expand homeownership opportunities to lower - and moderate -income households through down -payment assistance and other homeownership programs.
• Policy 4.3 Support housing suitable for special -needs groups, including seniors, people with disabilities, homeless people, military personnel, large households, single-parent families, and farm workers.
• Policy 4.4 Develop and maintain collaborative efforts among nonprofits, for -profit developers, and public agencies to encourage housing development, maintenance, and improvement.
GOAL 5. Further, there are equal housing opportunities for people, regardless of status.
• Policy 5.1 Support enforcement of fair housing laws prohibiting arbitrary discrimination in housing development, financing, rental, or sale. • Policy 5.2 Periodically review City ordinances and development regulations and modify, as necessary, to accommodate housing for disabled persons.
69 Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low‐ and moderate‐income families residing in public housing:
In coordination with the Housing Authority of Kings County's objective to provide affordable housing, the housing authority is committed to helping residents toward self‐sufficiency.
The Authority's Resident Services Department is the coordination center for information on opportunities and services t o help residents overcome obstacles and achieve their self‐ sufficiency goals.
Our overarching objective is to facilitate the transition of families residing in public housing into market -rate housing or, if possible, enable their participation in the first -time home buyers’ program. To achieve this, we offer a comprehensive range of programs and workshops for individuals who qualify for the program.
70 MA‐30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c)
Introduction
Many facilities, including emergency, transitional, and permanent supportive housing, provide housing and services to support people experiencing homelessness in Hanford and the region. Many organizations and nonprofits, such as the Kings Community Action Organization and the Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing, work to provide affordable housing options and support services for individuals and families experiencing homelessness.
These facilities maintain shelters and offer temporary housing for those in need, providing a safe and secure place to sleep and access necessities such as food, clothing, and hygiene products.
Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Emergency Shelter
Beds
Transitional
Housing
Beds
Permanent Supportive
Housing Beds
Year-
Round
Beds
(Current &
New)
Voucher /
Seasonal /
Overflow
Beds
Current &
New
Current
& New
Under
Development
Households with
Adult(s) and
Child(ren) 22 0 19 8 0
Households with
Only Adults 43 0 0 47 0
Chronically
Homeless
Households 0 0 0 0 0
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0
Unaccompanied
Youth 4 0 0 0 0
Table 5 - Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
71 Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services, to the extent that those services complement services targeted at homeless persons.
• Accommodation for families. It offers 16 days of hotel vouchers at $65/night for a family of three and an additional $15 each for any additional family members.
• The CalWORKs Permanent Homeless program offers a security deposit on permanent housing and utility deposits. It is available to families once every twelve (12) months. Monthly rent must be above 80% of the family’s household income.
• The CalWORKs Arrears Program offers up to two (2) months of missed rent payments. It is also available to families once every twelve (12) months. Monthly rent must be above 80% of the family’s household income.
• Housing Support Program —This is available for families already receiving CalWORKs benefits. It offers a security deposit, a tiered rental subsidy for up to ten (10) months, utility deposits, and appliances/furniture.
• Bringing Families Home --This is for families that only require housing to reunite.
Families also need a plan to show they can sustain the rent after the program ends.
This is reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
• Welfare to Work Program—This program is for CalWORKs-eligible families and aims to improve skills and create work opportunities. Services offered include Vocational Training/College Coursework, High School Diploma/GED Classes, Domestic Violence Assistance, Job Search Classes and Referrals, and Alcohol and Drug Counseling and Treatment Referrals.
• Cal Fresh Program (formerly Food Stamps): This program provides subsidized food budgets for low-income families to ensure balanced nutrition and other essential items. It does this through Electronic Benefit Transfer cards.
72 List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.
• Several facilities and programs address homelessness throughout Kings and Tulare Counties. While this is not the complete list of services and facilities, it reflects what is provided in the community. Services include the following:
• Hannah’s House— Located in Hanford, it provides transitional housing and inpatient substance- abuse treatment for women. It is also open to homeless individuals, people with children under five years old, those who require pre -natal care, and people with substance abuse issues.
• Kings United Way— HUD set up the Homeless Information Management system as a database for potential funders of programs within the county. There are 19 organizations and 48 programs under this system in Kings and Tulare Counties, including:
• The Salvation Army provides vouchers for motels to provide temporary shelter. It also provides rapid re -housing and homeless prevention for veterans and their families through the Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) program and clothing for homeless and low-income persons.
• The Kings County Action Organization (KCAO) coordinates Every Door Open (EDO) project. It provides rapid rehousing for women and children, persons in domestic violence shelters, and families currently living in places not meant for human habitation. The initiative also gives access to CalFresh and Medi-Cal. Mental health services are coordinated with Kings County Behavioral Health for persons with substance—and alcohol-abuse issues.
• Aspiranet is a transitional housing program for youth ages 18 -24 who are transitioning into adulthood from the foster care or probation system. The program helps youth with transportation, housing, emotional support, mental health, ongoing education, job readiness training, and employment.
73 MA‐35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) Introduction
The special needs population comprises individuals with physical, mental, emotional, or developmental disabilities. It also includes people who require specialized healthcare services due to chronic illnesses or conditions.
Due to various barriers, these populations often need help in receiving proper care and support. These barriers can be physical, such as inaccessible facilities, lack of transportation, or communication barriers. They can also be social, including discrimination and stigmatization.
Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents , and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify and describe their supportive housing needs.
According to consultations done in the community, supportive housing needs for the following populations include:
• The city of Hanford, CA, needs to take proactive measures to assist the population living with AIDS. This includes increasing public awareness about HIV/AIDS, providing access to affordable and quality healthcare services, and promoting inclusivity and non-discrimination towards people living with AIDS.
• One critical step the city can take is to educate its residents about HIV/AIDS. This can be achieved through various means, such as community seminars, workshops, and awareness campaigns. The city can also partner with local health organizations and non -profits to conduct regular HIV testing drives and distribute educational materials about the prevention and treatment of the disease.
• Furthermore, the city of Hanford should actively promote inclusivity and non - discrimination towards people living with AIDS. This includes implementing policies to protect against discrimination based on HIV status and providing resources for individuals facing discrimination. The city can also work towards creating a more understanding and empathetic community by organizing events and activities that bring people of all backgrounds together.
74 Persons with alcohol or other drug addictions
• Firstly, education and awareness programs should be implemented in schools, community centers, and public spaces. This will help foster a culture of understanding and acceptance toward those dealing with addiction and reduce the stigma surrounding it. By educating individuals on the risks and consequences of drug and alcohol abuse and providing resources for seeking help, the city can empower its citizens to make informed decisions and seek treatment if necessary.
Secondly, the city of Hanford should work towards increasing access to treatment options for those struggling with addiction. This could include partnering with local healthcare providers or organizations to offer affordable or accessible services and advocating for state and federal funding for addiction treatment programs.
Additionally, the city of Hanford can work towards implementing harm reduction strategies such as needle exchange programs and safe injection sites, which have been proven to reduce the spread of diseases like HIV and Hepatitis C among intravenous drug users.
• Additionally, the city of Hanford could also explore developing specific housing programs or facilities tailored towards supporting individuals in recovery from addictions. These programs could include access to resources such as counseling services, employment assistance, and peer support groups within the housing facility. This would create a supportive and understanding community for individuals to navigate their recovery journey.
Public housing residents
• Residents in Hanford, CA, have access to various educational opportunities that help them acquire new skills and knowledge to improve their lives in public housing units. Some programs offered by public housing authorities include adult education classes, GED preparation courses, vocational training programs, and higher education scholarships. These programs help residents gain the necessary skills and qualifications to secure better job opportunities, increase their earning potential, and ultimately achieve self-sufficiency where they can afford market-rate housing.
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing.
The City of Hanford does offer specialized vouchers, public housing, and special rate housing to supplement a lack of income for residents who have just been discharged from a healthcare institution. Mainstream vouchers are offered to nonelderly disabled residents who need housing. These vouchers are provided to citizens with a disability that hinders their ability to work, and as a result, they struggle to obtain adequate housing.
75 These mainstream vouchers are designed to help individuals with disabilities receive safe, decent, and affordable housing. The City of Hanford also offers public housing units specifically designated for low -income families, elderly residents, and persons with disabilities. These units provide subsidized rent based on the resident's income.
The City of Hanford also offers market -rate housing that could be used by individuals recently released from mental or physical health institutions. In addition to providing affordable housing options, the city also has a homeless prevention program. This program offers financial assistance and case management services to individuals and families at risk of homelessness.
Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Lin k to one‐year goals. 91.315(e)
The City of Hanford's commitment to affordable housing will also see continued efforts in providing financial assistance for first-time homebuyers through down payment and closing cost assistance programs. These initiatives aim to make homeownership more accessible for individuals and families with low-to-moderate incomes.
For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one‐year goals. (91.220(2))
To be included in the final document.
76 MA‐40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e)
Adverse Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment
Zoning has always been involved in the construction of housing units, specifically affordable housing units. One of the primary purposes of zoning is to separate different types of land use, such as residential areas from commercial or industrial areas.
This separation is often seen as beneficial because it can help reduce noise, pollution, and traffic in residential areas. However, this also means that affordable housing units may be restricted to certain areas, limiting the options for low-income families.
Zoning has been a controversial topic regarding affordable housing. Some argue that strict zoning laws make it difficult for developers to build affordable housing units in desirable areas. This can lead to the concentration of poverty in specific neighborhoods and limit access to economic opportunities for low-income individuals and families.
NIMBYism (Not In My Backyard) is a term often used in urban planning and development circles to describe opposition or resistance towards new projects or developments in one's community. This can include anything from new housing developments and commerci al projects to public services such as homeless shelters or waste management facilities. It can also affect residential investments, as existing homeowners may fear the impact of new developments on their property values.
The economic impact of NIMBYism is multifaceted, influencing not just the housing market but also local and regional economies at large. On the one hand, it can lead to a scarcity of affordable housing by hindering the development of new projects, which drives up prices and rents, making it difficult for lower and middle-income families to afford to live in certain areas. This exacerbates socioeconomic divides and can contribute to gentrification. On the other hand, by restricting development, NIMBYism can also stifle economic growth and job creation that often come with new construction projects. Furthermore, the reluctance to accommodate new developments can lead to inefficient use of land and resources, hampering urban renewal and the improvement of public infrastructure and services.
77 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) Introduction
The City of Hanford's economic development goals, objectives, and policies will help shape the City and County's growth. Economic development policies determine where governmental funds will be spent and where job growth will be encouraged. They also provide avenues for employment and revenue generation for residents and create a tax base for local government. These policies also play a crucial role in attracting outside businesses and industries to invest in the community.
The City of Hanford's unemployment rate is below the national average of 7.1%, making it an attractive location for job seekers and businesses. However, the City of Hanford recognizes room for improvement and has implemented various initiatives to attract new businesses and create employment opportunities. Economic Development Market Analysis studies and workforce development programs are examples of the City's efforts to address this issue. Below is a breakdown of the employment shares by industry in the City of Hanford.
Below is a breakdown of the employment shares by industry in the City of Hanford.
Economic Development Market Analysis Business Activity
Table 34
Business by Sector Number
of
Workers
Number
of Jobs
Share of
Workers
%
Share
of Jobs
%
Jobs
less
workers
%
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas
Extraction
2,241 336 17 3 -14
Arts, Entertainment,
Accommodations
1,677 1,791 12 15 3
Construction 530 234 4 2 -2
Education and Health Care Services 2,631 4,427 19 38 19 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 600 616 5 5 0
Information 157 123 1 1 0
Manufacturing 1,854 621 14 5 -9
Other Services 441 325 3 3 0
Professional, Scientific,
Management Services
604 498 4 4 0
Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0
Retail Trade 1,819 2,388 13 20 7
Transportation and Warehousing 438 169 3 1 -2
Wholesale Trade 557 202 4 2 -2
Total 13,594 11,730 -- -- --
78 Labor Force
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 24,988
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 24,988
Unemployment Rate 21,535
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 13.82
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 28.29
Table 65 - Labor Force
Data
Source:
2007-2011 ACS
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business, and financial 3,496
Farming, fisheries, and forestry occupations 776
Service 2,613
Sales and office 4,700
Construction, extraction, maintenance, and repair 2,816 Production, transportation, and material moving 1,268
Table36 – Occupations by Sector
Data
Source:
2007-2011 ACS
Travel Time
Travel Time Number Percentage
< 30 Minutes 15,595 74%
30-59 Minutes 4,648 22%
60 or More Minutes 747 4%
Total 20,990 74%
Table 37 - Travel Time
Data
Source:
2007-2011 ACS
Education:
Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian
Employed
Unemployed Not in the
Labor Force
Less than a high school graduate 2,666 617 1,609
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 4,063 756 1,644
Some college or associate degree 7,345 101 2,188
Bachelor's degree or higher 3,837 183 819
Table 387 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status Data
Source:
2007-2011 ACS
79 Educational Attainment by Age
Age
18–24
yrs.
25–34
yrs.
35–44
yrs.
45–65
yrs.
65+
yrs.
Less than 9th grade 61 348 617 1,456 1,033
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,076 984 742 745 577
High school graduate, GED, or
alternative
1,220
2,118
1,583
2,813
1,749
In some colleges, no degree 2,404 2,638 2,220 3,335 1,157 Associate degree 202 718 667 1,157 265
Bachelor's degree 171 1,136 916 1,643 531
Graduate or professional degree 60 307 381 774 236
Table 39 - Educational Attainment by Age
Data
Source:
2013-2017 ACS
Educational Attainment – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than a high school graduate 27,132
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 36,640
Some college or associate degree 56,931
Bachelor's degree 80,296
Graduate or professional degree 36,640
Table 408 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
The City of Hanford has diverse industry investments. However, the primary business in the region is:
• Agriculture,
• Education
• Healthcare
The most significant employer sector in Hanford, CA, is education service providers.
Several institutions in Hanford offer education services at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels. These schools include public, private, international, and technical or vocational institutions. This primary employer in Hanford dramatically impacts the local economy by providing employment opportunities for teachers, administrators, and support staff.
80 The second primary industries are health care and social assistance, which is very good for Hanford's economy. Medical care is an essential need for every person, and the sector provides various services such as hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, home heal th care services, and mental health facilities. This sector also employs many people in multiple positions, such as doctors, nurses, medical technicians, therapists, and administrators.
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community:
The City of Hanford has an employed population of approximately 60,000, with 19.1% having a bachelor's degree or higher. The area's primary non-administration industries are education services, which comprise 22.8% of the workforce, and retail trade, whi ch comprises 12% of the market. These primary industries are pillars of employment in the City of Hanford, but employment diversification is needed to expand job opportunities.
While the City of Hanford continues to grow, it also faces challenges such a s maintaining a solid growth market and creating job opportunities for its citizens.
One area of focus for the City of Hanford is increasing the number of residents with higher education degrees. Currently, only 5,246 people hold a bachelor's degree or higher. The City recognizes the importance of having a well -educated workforce to attr act new businesses and industries. Therefore, efforts are being made to improve educational opportunities and encourage residents to pursue higher education.
To achieve its goal of growing the market and increasing the tax base, the City of Hanford has a goal of implementing various initiatives, including partnerships with local universities and colleges to offer educational programs and training opportunities. This will benefit many citizens seeking jobs and those looking to change industries. Additionally, the City is working on attracting new businesses and industries to the area through tax incentives and business-friendly policies. This will not only cre ate job opportunities for its residents but also bring in new sources of revenue for the City of Hanford.
A broader tax base could tremendously benefit public infrastructure. The expanded tax base could mean better roads, water systems, and public transportation. Ultimately, this will fund the City of Hanford's cleanup mission, which has been ongoing for several years.
The initiative is in partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency to ensure the environment remains safe and healthy for its residents. Continuous efforts are being made to restore and revitalize contaminated areas, making them suitable for development.
81 Describe any significant changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support, or infrastructure that these changes may create.
The first-time home buyers’ program expansion is already in place but has undergone more development, with additional funds being allocated from the city and county budget. This initiative will assist in building individual wealth.
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
The City of Hanford, a hub for agriculture and industries such as healthcare, education, and retail, has a diverse workforce. However, with the increasing demand for skilled labor in various fields, there has been a focus on promoting higher education in t he city. There is economic opportunity there, but to increase growth opportunities, efforts have been made to provide more education and skill development programs. Unfortunately, the City of Hanford has faced challenges attracting industry growth opportun ities or expanding its working population because of its limited skilled labor force.
Describe any current workforce training initiatives that Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges, and other organizations support . Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan
The City of Hanford, in cooperation with King County, offers several initiatives to support the local economy and promote business growth through:
• Employment strategies developed, such as the San Joaquin Valley and Associated Counties (SJVAC) Regional Planning Unit (RPU) Regional Plan Two -Year Modification, which guides the implementation of the Federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) in the San Joaquin Valley Region. This plan has been developed in response to guidance from the California Employment Development Department. The Regional Plan provides strategic direction for WIOA services.
• The Kings County Job Training Office (JTO) offers various programs and services to help residents gain essential job skills, find employment opportunities, and advance their careers.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)?
Yes
82 If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.
The CED (Community Economic Development) program is an essential component of the Consolidated Plan, which outlines strategies for addressing community needs and promoting economic development. By coordinating with the Strategic Plan and Annual Action Plan, the CED helps ensure that funding is allocated effectively and efficiently to achieve the goals outlined in these plans. The CED Program outline initiates industry growth in all significant market shares in the City of Hanford. This includes initiati ves for job creation, workforce development, small business support, and affordable housing.
The CED program also plays a vital role in promoting social equity and inclusion within the community. By providing resources and support for minority-owned businesses and low- income individuals, the CED program helps to level the playing field and create opportunities for all community members to thrive. In addition, the CED program revitalizes and develops underserved areas of the city, impro ving access to services and amenities for residents.
Discussion
83 MA‐50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion
MAP 1
84 MAP 2
85 MAP 3
86 Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")
Upon conducting an analysis of minority concentrations within the city of Hanford, it was determined that Home Garden possesses the highest minority population among the neighborhoods. Notably, the Hispanic Non -white demographic prevails in Home Garden, constituting an impressive 83% of the area's total population. This is followed by the Asian demographic, accounting for 11% of the population, thereby indicating a significant cultural diversity. Furthermore, African Americans comprise 4% of the population, enriching the community's ethnic composition. This analysis underscores the vibrant multicultural character of Home Garden, distinguishing it as a uniquely diverse community within Hanford. At the same time, this region is grappling with pressing housing challenges that affect a considerable segment of its residents. These issues include not only severe overcrowding but also substandard living conditions that fall below acceptable levels of comfort and safety. This complex situation underscores the urgent need for comprehensive solutions.
Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")
The Home Garden region exhibits the highest proportion of individuals with incomes below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). Given the average household size of 4.3, numerous families face challenges in securing affordable housing solutions suitable for their requirements. This predicament is amplified by the scarcity of rental properties and accessible opportunities for affordable home ownership.
What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods?
The markets within these neighborhoods, characterized by their significant populations of low-income families and ethnic minorities, present distinctive challenges, and opportunities. The demand for affordable housing exceeds the available options, contributing to a rise in rental prices and exacerbating the housing affordability crisis.
Furthermore, these areas frequently suffer from underinvestment in infrastructure and public services, negatively impacting the residents' quality of life. However, there i s a substantial opportunity for redevelopment and investment in community resources, which could attract new businesses and services that cater to the unique needs and cultural aspects of the local population. Such initiatives have the potential to foster economic growth, improve living conditions, and strengthen community cohesion, thereby enhancing the overall vibrancy and sustainability of urban environments.
87 Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods?
Despite the challenges encountered by residents in these neighborhoods, there are numerous community assets that significantly contribute to the area's economic potential.
Educational institutions, local enterprises, and community centers constitute the foundational elements of these neighborhoods, providing crucial services and fostering a sense of community among residents. Furthermore, grassroots organizations and non - profit entities are actively engaged in community development initiatives, implementing a range of programs focused on education, economic empowerment, housing stability, and health services. Public parks and green spaces serve as vital communal resources, offering recreational opportunities to residents and enhancing the neighborhood's aesthetic appeal.
These ass ets are instrumental in fostering community resilience, promoting social interaction, and elevating the overall quality of life for individuals residing in underserved communities.
Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas?
In addition to the possibility of redeveloping and investing in community resources, there are further strategic opportunities for revitalizing and growing underserved neighborhoods.
For instance, local governments could implement targeted policies and ini tiatives that address crucial issues such as affordable housing, healthcare access, transportation infrastructure, and employment generation. By focusing on these key areas of development, policymakers can improve the economic situation of these neighborhoods.
88 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2)
Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for low - and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.
The internet has become such an integral part of our modern society that navigating society without it is almost impossible. From applying for Jobs to being used as a research apparatus, the internet is the one-stop shop for all our needs. Over the years, the internet has evolved and expanded and seems necessary in almost every aspect of our lives. To keep up with the constant changes, each citizen should have the opportunity to obtain some level of internet literacy.
Broadband access is the ability to access high -speed internet services. It allows users to transmit and receive data at a much faster rate compared to traditional dial -up connections. With the increasing demand for digital connectivity, broadband access has become essential to modern life. Various broadband connections , such as DSL, cable, fiber-optic, satellite, and mobile broadband, are available.
Not having broadband internet access can slow down productivity and limit upward mobility, which is all too often the situation that citizens may not have access to because of a lack of personal funds or simply because they live in a rural or remote area. This lack of access can lead to a digital divide, where some individuals or communities have access to the benefits of high-speed internet while others do not.
Civil Rights activists now consider a disparity in high-speed internet access a new form of segregation. As more aspects of our lives shift online, the lack of access to high -speed internet can significantly impact an individual's ability to participate i n society. This can lead to unequal opportunities for education and employment, specifically for individuals who find themselves in the LMI to ELI designation. These communities face systemic inequalities and marginalization, making it even more imperati ve that they have equal access to high-speed internet.
In 2015, the FCC released an Open Internet Order, also known as net neutrality rules, to ensure equal access to the Internet for all individuals. These rules prohibit internet service providers from discriminating or blocking access to certain websites or applications. The policy was adopted to ensure that low - to highly low -income communities are not subjected to digital re dlining, and providers purposely avoid areas with lower -income residents.
89 Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
According to 2017 data, out of 18,185 households in the City of Hanford, approximately 14,159 have access to broadband internet or are currently using it. Roughly 78 percent of its residents can get access to high-speed internet. However, this still leaves 22 percent of the households in Hanford needing broadband internet access.
The importance of having more than one broadband internet service provider serving a jurisdiction such as Hanford, California, cannot be overstated. It is crucial for ensuring fair competition and better services for consumers. With only one provider domin ating the market, they have little incentive to improve their services or offer competitive prices. This lack of competition can lead to higher costs and limited consumer options.
Having multiple providers in the market increases competition, which can drive down prices and encourage providers to offer better services to attract customers. This benefits the City of Hanford's consumers by giving them more choices and potentially lower costs.
Still, it also spurs innovation and investment in infrastructure from the providers as they strive to stay competitive.
Discussion
The current broadband internet landscape in Hanford, California, demonstrates some disparity in access, with nearly a quarter of its households needing more high -speed internet. To address this issue, policymakers and regulators must consider expanding broadband and encourage more competition among providers. This will benefit the Hanford residents and the economy as a whole by promoting innovation and access to essential services. By acting towards increasing competition in the broadband market, we can bridge the digital divide and ensure that all households have access to reliable high - speed internet.
90 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3)
Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has classified King County, CA, as a high - risk flooding area. This designation is not without reason. King County has a history of experiencing numerous floods, which have caused significant damage to properties and infrastructure. It is crucial for residents and local authorities to fully comprehend the risks associated with flooding and take the necessary precautions to mitigate its impact.
Historically, King County has been the site of several significant flood events impacting the community and landscape. Notably, the floods of 1997 and 2006 stand out for their severity and the scale of damage caused. In 1997, heavy rainfall over a short pe riod led to rivers overflowing their banks, inundating numerous homes and businesses.
However, the City of Hanford, the seat of King County as a whole, isn't defined as an at-risk area for flood, but the outskirts are. Moreover, climate change and increasing urbanization have only made matters worse. With more impervious surfaces such as roads and buildings, rainwater runoff has increased, exacerbating the risk of flooding.
Kings County's Office of Emergency Management (OEM) is the County's emergency management agency responsible for coordinating and facilitating disaster response and recovery efforts. The OEM works closely with local emergency responders, community organizations, and federal agencies to develop comprehensive plans for dealing with natural disasters like floods. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) is an actionable OEM development strategy to effectively manage natural and human-induced disasters for King County and the City of Hanford.
The County Emergency Operations Center (EOC), located in Hanford, is the dedicated response and recovery facility for all major emergencies within King County. The EOC becomes active during natural disasters such as floods, acting as a central command post for coordinating emergency response e fforts. It serves as the nerve center of all disaster operations, providing communication and coordination between various agencies and organizations involved in emergency response and recovery.
In addition to the EOP and EOC, King County also has an Emergency Management Plan (EMP) that outlines strategies for mitigating risks and preparing the community for potential disasters. The EMP strategizes for effective response and recovery from potential hazards, including floods, earthquakes, and wildfires. It also includes evacuation plans, shelters, and resource distribution in a disaster.
91 Another agency that may become active depending on the severity of a disaster is the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This federal agency supports state and local governments in their response and recovery efforts during a disaster. They provi de resources, assistance, and funding to impacted communities to aid in their recovery.
Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods.
The outliner districts of Hanford have a diminishing AMI. The median family income in these areas was approximately $43,000 in 2017 , significantly lower than the median income of more affluent areas in or near the metro Hanford area. This creates a disparity in the ability to maintain safe, affordable housing in the surrounding area while not being able to afford housing in disaster-ready areas.
In addition to the lower median income characteristic of low - and moderate -income households, another vulnerability these households face is flooding. The average family in these areas needs help to afford the required insurance to cover flood damage.
Furthermore, inadequate housing infrastructure and the inability to financially invest in repairs resulting from flood damage leave these households at a higher risk of homelessness in the event of severe damage.
Furthermore, the lack of access to emergency resources exacerbates the vulnerability of low- and moderate-income households in a disaster. These communities often suffer from a scarcity of emergency shelters, limited access to communication systems for ea rly warning, and a general lack of preparedness resources.
Consequently, when disasters strike, these populations are more likely to experience severe impacts, including loss of life, health issues, and prolonged displacement. The compounded effect of these vulnerabilities necessitates a comprehensive strategy to improve housing resilience, enhance emergency preparedness, and ensure equitable access to recovery resources for low- and moderate-income households.
92 MAP 4
93 STRATEGIC PLAN:
SP‐05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview
The Strategic Plan is a five-year plan that outlines the city of Hanford's vision for the future of affordable housing. This plan includes goals, strategies, and actions to increase access to affordable housing options for low-income residents.
Some of the initiatives outlined in the Strategic Plan include increasing the number of Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers available, expanding public housing units, and creating specialized housing programs such as those for foster youth and farm laborers.
The goal is also to supply affordable housing for Hanford's low - to moderate -income earners. This can be achieved by working with developers to create more affordable housing units and providing financial assistance for renovation or construction projects. In addition, the plan also focuses on improving the quality of existing affordable housing options. This includes implementing programs to help residents with home repairs and upgrades and creating community centers and other amenities within public housi ng developments.
With ongoing efforts and partnerships between the Kings County Housing Authority, local government agencies, and private developers, the city of Hanford is working towards making affordable housing a reality for all its residents.
Moreover, the Strategic Plan also addresses the issue of homelessness in Hanford. It includes initiatives to provide homeless individuals with resources and support to secure permanent housing and programs that address root causes of homelessness, such as mental health and substance abuse.
94 SP‐10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) Geographic Area Table 9 - Geographic Priority Areas
1 Area Name: CITY OF HANFORD
Area Type: Citywide
Other Target Area Description:
HUD Approval Date:
% of Low/ Mod: Relative
Revital Type: Comprehensive
Other Revital Description: Housing
Identify the neighborhood
boundaries for this target
area.
The Southside of the
City of Hanford
Include specific housing and
commercial characteristics of
this target area.
More than one-half of households (xx percent or number) in the City are LMI, with incomes ranging from 0-80% area median income (AMI). As stated in the Needs Assessment, cost burden is the most common housing problem; percent of households in the City experience a cost burden or severe cost burden.
Mortgage assistance, rental assistance, senior housing, and housing for people with disabilities. Property maintenance - Emergency/Minor Repair, Rehabilitation and Accessibility Program
How did your consultation and
citizen participation process
help you to identify this
neighborhood as a target
area?
Speaking to various community stakeholders, their consultation has highlighted the need for proper home maintenance and repair in the area.
Identify the needs in this target
area.
What are the opportunities for
improvement in this target
area?
Are there barriers to
improvement in this target
area?
Area Type:
Other Target Area Description:
HUD Approval Date:
% of Low/ Mod:
Revital Type:
Other Revital Description:
Identify the neighborhood
boundaries for this target
area.
95 Include specific housing and
commercial characteristics of
this target area.
How did your consultation and
citizen participation process
help you to identify this
neighborhood as a target
area?
Identify the needs in this target
area.
What are the opportunities for
improvement in this target
area?
Are there barriers to
improvement in this target
area?
96 SP‐25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2)
1 Priority
Need
Name
Housing
Priority
Level
High
Population Extremely
Low
Low
Moderate
Middle
Large
Families
Families
with
Children
Elderly
Public Housing
Residents
Unaccompanied Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental
Disabilities
Persons with Physical
Disabilities
Persons with
Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or
Other Addictions Persons
with HIV/AIDS and their
Families
Victims of
Domestic
Violence
Non-housing
Community
Development
Description More than one-half of households (xx percent or number) in the City are LMI, with incomes ranging from 0-80% area median income (AMI). As stated in the Needs Assessment, cost burden is the most common housing problem; percent of households in the City experience a cost burden or severe cost burden.
Mortgage assistance, rental assistance, senior housing, and housing for people with disabilities. Property maintenance - Emergency/Minor Repair, Rehabilitation and Accessibility Program
97 Basis for
Relative
Priority
Relative priority is based on community needs surveys, meetings, and data analysis. Housing Element, Housing Conditions Study, HUD Comprehensive Housing Maket Analysis and Consistent with the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment Survey results, affordable housing for low- and moderate- income residents is a high priority.
2 Priority
Need
Name
Public Services
Priority
Level
High
Population Extremely
Low
Low
Moderate
Large
Families
with
Children
Elderly
Public
Housing
Residents
Chronic
Homelessness
Individuals
Families with
Children
Mentally Ill
Chronic Substance
Abuse Veterans
Persons with
HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic
Violence
Unaccompanied
Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with
Mental Disabilities
Persons with
Physical
Disabilities
Persons with
Developmental
Disabilities
Persons with
Alcohol or Other
Addictions
Persons with
HIV/AIDS and their
Families
Victims of Domestic
Violence
Non-housing
Community
Development
Associated
Goals
Public Services
98 Description COC Services include mental health, senior services, fair housing, senior centers, youth centers, anti-crime programs, and HIV/AIDS Centers and Services.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Consistent with the 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment Survey results, providing a wide range of public services for low- and moderate-income residents is a high priority.
3 Priority
Need
Name
Neighborhood Preservation and Public Facilities
Priority
Level
High
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Large Families
Families with Children
Families with Children
Associated
Goals
Community Development/Enhancement
Description Sidewalk Improvements, Cleanup of Abandoned Lots of Buildings and Code Enforcement
Improvements to community, public facilities, and accessibility improvements
99 Basis for
Relative
Priority
Based upon the community outreach meetings, stakeholder interviews, and surveys completed, the top five (in order of priorities) identified are affordable housing, housing maintenance, community/special needs services, homeless needs, community development, and public improvements, such as street improvements.
4 Priority
Need
Name
Shelter and Services for the Homeless
Priority
Level
High
100
Population Extremely
Low
Large
Families
Families
with
Children
Elderly
Public
Housing
Residents'
Chronic
Homelessness
Individuals
Families with
Children
Mentally Ill
Chronic
Substance
Abuse
Veterans
Persons with
HIV/AIDS
Victims of
Domestic
Violence
Unaccompanied
Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental
Disabilities
Persons with Physical
Disabilities
Persons with Developmental
Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or
Other Addictions
Persons with HIV/AIDS and
their Families
Victims of Domestic
Violence
Associated
Goals
Public Services Community Development/Enhancement
Description Emergency shelter and transitional housing. -Provide emergency shelter for the homeless -Provide mental health services, mental health services -services for youth in the schools -Substance abuse treatment, domestic violence support - Support services for older people (meals, transportation) -rent/utility payments - Tenant based rental assistance -expanded voucher program Basis for
Relative
Priority
In community meetings, surveys, and stakeholder meetings, the need for comprehensive homeless programs was consistently ranked as one of the City’s greatest needs. This need was supported by data provided in the City’s 2023 Point in Time Count, as well as data maintained by the City.
5 Priority
Need
Name
Administration Community Development
101
Priority
Level
High
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Associated
Goals
Program Administration
Description Provide planning and administration services for the City's CDBG Program.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Support staff for administration of the CDBG program.
Narrative:
Based upon the community outreach meetings, stakeholder interviews and surveys completed, the top five (in order of priorities) identified are affordable housing, housing maintenance, community/special needs services, homeless needs, community development, neighborhood services and public improvements, such as street improvements.
102
General Allocation Priorities
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
One of the main factors determining the allocation of investments geographically within a jurisdiction, such as Hanford, CA, in this case, is the distribution of low-income households and their housing needs. This includes identifying areas with high concentrations of poverty and a lack of affordable housing options. In addition, the funds will be allocated to the most directly affected by the needs of low -income residents, such as public transportation and job opportunities.
Other factors that may influence the allocation of investments include demographic data, such as age, race/ethnicity, and household composition, as well as housing market trends and development plans. The local government should conduct a thorough needs assessment and work closely with community stakeholders to prioritize areas in need of affordable housing investments.
Narrative (Optional)
Based on the community outreach meetings, stakeholder interviews, and surveys completed, the top five (in order of priorities) identified are affordable housing, housing maintenance, community/special needs services, homeless needs, community development, neighborhood services, and public improvements, such as street improvements.
The primary objective for the housing and economic development department in Hanford, CA, is to balance the growth and revitalization of the community while ensuring that all residents, regardless of income, have access to affordable housing. By prioritizi ng investments in areas of greatest need, the department aims to promote equity and inclusiveness. Moreover, by fostering diverse and mixed-income neighborhoods, they seek to create a vibrant, sustainable, and cohesive community that nurtures economic resilience and social harmony. The department's strategic approach focuses on long -term socioeconomic benefits beyond simply meeting immediate housing needs, encapsulating a vision supporting the prosperity of all Hanford citizens.
103
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) Influence of Market Conditions Affordable Housing Type Market Characteristics that will influence the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based Rental
Assistance (TBRA) N/A
TBRA for Non-Homeless
Special Needs
The City is not an entitlement jurisdiction for HOME funds and does not anticipate using CDBG funds for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance.
New Unit Production
The City is not an entitlement jurisdiction for HOME funds and does not anticipate using CDBG funds for new housing construction. However, CDBG funds may be used to provide infrastructure improvements associated with the new construction of affordable housing.
Rehabilitation
The City will invest state, or federal funding sources in addressing residential rehabilitation needs to preserve the supply of ownership housing.
Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate-income households is a cost -effective way to invest limited non - CDBG resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to lowand moderate-income households in the community. Additionally, rehabilitation will assist in resolving housing problems that residents face throughout City of Hanford .
Addressing substandard housing conditions through housing preservation activities ensures that all economic segments of the community have the opportunity to live in decent housing that meets local standards.
Given the limited amount of CDBG funds available and the difficulty of low- and moderate-income households in obtaining home improvement financing on the private market, CDBG funds may be used for rehabilitation and emergency repairs of housing for low- and moderate-income households.
Acquisition, including
preservation
As the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis in this document have clearly shown, thousands of Hanford households are cost burdened or face one of the five housing problems.
104
SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c) (1,2) Introduction
In pursuit of its commitment to affordable housing, Hanford has initiated several dedicated programs. While the Housing and Economic Development Department may have a specific goal for affordable housing investments, it is essential to note that this goal may change based on external factors such as federal funding. As seen in the above example, the annual allocation for 2024 may vary depending on the decisions made by the current city administration.
The anticipated resources to complete these plans for Hanford will be distributed appropriately based on the community's priority needs.
105
Anticipated Resources
Table 50 – Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
Depending on the financing structure of a given activity, it may be advantageous for the City to use CDBG funds to leverage appropriate state, local, and private resources, including but not limited to those listed below State Resour
• State Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
• Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA)
• CalHome Program
• Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
• Housing Related Parks Grant
• CalHFA Single and Multi-Family Program
• Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
CDBG Entitlement funds will be leveraged to address the housing needs of low-income.
Program Source of
Funds Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1
Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan $
Narrative
Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income: $
Prior Year
Resources: $ Total: $
CDBG federal
Acquisition
Homebuyer
assistance
Homeowner
rehab
Public Services
Public
Improvements
$521,703 $398,895 0 $920,598 $2,086,812 The City will receive an estimated
$521,703 yearly
during its
Consolidated Plan
cycle.
106
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
The City of Hanford does not have land to accommodate the uses identified in this plan.
Discussion
107
SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k)
Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will conduct its consolidated plan , including private industry, non -profit organizations, and public institutions.
Responsible Entity Responsible Entity
Type
Role
Geographic Area
Served
City of Hanford Government
Non-homeless special
needs
Ownership
Planning Rental
Jurisdiction
Kings Tulare Continuum
of Care Continuum of care Homelessness Region
Housing Authority of
Kings County PHA Public Services Region
The City of Hanford, California, is a city that has housing administration at the heart of its priorities. With an estimated population of around 58,000 people, the City of Hanford understands the importance and impact of having efficient and effective housing policies.
The housing administration in Hanford operates under the Community Development Department, which oversees all aspects of community development.
Kings Tulare Continuum of Care , one of the critical organizations that works closely with the housing administration in Hanford , is the Kings Tulare Continuum of Care (KTCOC).
This organization addresses homelessness and provides support services for individuals and families in need.
KTCOC aims to prevent and end regional homelessness through collaboration and coordination with local agencies. They work hand in hand with the housing administration to identify and secure affordable housing options for those experiencing homelessness.
In addition, KTCOC provides various services, such as case management, mental health counseling, and employment assistance, to help individuals and families maintain stable housing. This partnership between the housing administration and organizations like KTCOC is crucial in addressing the complex issue of homelessness.
Housing Authority of Kings County , apart from the housing administration and organizations like KTCOC, the Housing Authority of Kings County (HAKC) provides affordable housing options for low-income individuals and families in Hanford.
The HAKC offers programs, such as the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, Public Housing Program, and Family Self-Sufficiency Program, to assist eligible individuals and families secure safe and decent housing.
108
Through these programs, the HAKC works towards improving the quality of life for low - income individuals and families by providing access to affordable housing. The housing administration closely collaborates with HAKC to ensure that those in need have equa l access to these programs.
Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted too
Homeless
Targeted to People
with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X X X
Legal Assistance X X X
Mortgage Assistance X X X
Rental Assistance X X X
Utility Assistance X X X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X X X
Mobile Clinics X X X
Other Street Outreach Services X X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X X
Childcare X X X
Education X X X
HIV/AIDS X X X
Life Skills X X
X
Mental Health Counseling X X X
Transportation X X X
Other
109
Describe how the service delivery system , including, but not limited to, the services listed above, meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
One way the city of Hanford is remedying homelessness through the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act (HEARTH) is by allocating investments geographically within its jurisdiction. The Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act (HEARTH) helps the city of Hanford address homelessness in several ways. One of the main ways is funding programs that support homeless individuals and families. This means that the HUD -funded programs, specifically the Continuum of Care (CoC), will pr ioritize areas with high housing needs and invest resources in those areas accordingly.
One way the city of Hanford is remedying homelessness through the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act (HEARTH) is by allocating investments geographically within its jurisdiction. The Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act (HEARTH) helps the city of Hanford address homelessness in several ways. One of the main ways is funding programs that support homeless individuals and families. This means that the HUD -funded programs, specifically the Continuum of Care (CoC), will prioritize areas with high housing needs and invest resources in those areas accordingly.
This allocation is based on several factors, including the current homeless population in different parts of Hanford and geographical disparities within the jurisdiction. By identifying and prioritizing areas with high concentrations of homeless individuals and families, the CoC can effectively target resources to address critical housing needs.
In addition to these efforts, HEARTH also recognizes the importance of providing mental health services for homeless veterans. Many veterans experience trauma during their time in service and may struggle with mental health issues such as PTSD or depression.
In conclusion, HEARTH's comprehensive approach to addressing homelessness among veterans not only aims to reduce the immediate issue of homelessness but also focuses on improving their overall well -being and future stability. Through collaboration and advocacy, HEARTH continues to make a positive impact in the lives of veterans in need.
110
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above.
The gaps in delivery are simply a need for adequate funding for these services by advocating for increased funding and resources. Programs such as HEARTH and other federally funded programs help to bridge this gap and ensure that homeless veterans have access to the necessary support they need.
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for conducting a strategy to address priority needs.
Allocating proper funding to meet the needs of special needs and homeless populations is crucial to address the gap in institutional structure and service delivery effectively. This can be achieved through a targeted case management system that efficiently uses available resources.
Furthermore, institutions and organizations must collaborate and coordinate efforts to provide services for these vulnerable populations. This can lead to a more streamlined and practical approach to meeting their needs.
In addition, education and awareness initiatives should be implemented to inform the public about the challenges special needs and homeless individuals face and how they can support and assist in addressing these issues.
111
SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4)
Sort
Order
Goal
Name
Start
Year
End
Year
Category
Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
1 Housing 2024 2028 Affordable
Housing
Citywide Ensure equal
access to
housing
opportunities
CDBG:
$1,098,479
Households Assisted
50 Housing
Rehabilitation
2 First Time
Homebuyers
2 Program
Administration
2024 2028 Citywide Program
oversight
CDBG:
$621,479
3 Public Services 2024 2028 Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Provide public
services for
moderate
income
residents
CBBG
$267,000
Public service activities
other than
Low/Moderate Income
Housing. Homeless
benefit 300 persons.
Assisted public service
activities. Senior
services 300 persons
4 Community
Development
Enhancement
2024 2028 Sustainability Citywide Create a
suitable living
environment
CDBG:
$1,000,000
Public Facility or
Infrastructure Activities
1 Facility
112
Goals Summary Information
Goal Descriptions
Estimate the number of highly low -income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
1 Goal
Name
Housing
Goal
Description
The City of Hanford seeks to increase the affordable housing stock by supporting the planning, design, and construction of new housing units; homeownership through new or existing home buyers, including down payment assistance; housing rehabilitation, including home improvement assistance programs, affordable rental housing construction for special needs families; the building or converting existing buildings for homeless housing; housing construction—partner with CHDO agencies for project work. 2 Goal
Name
Program Administration
Goal
Description
Provide Planning and Administration of the City's CDBG Program. 3 Goal
Name
Public Services
Goal
Description
The City of Hanford will address community and special needs through increased mental and behavioral health public services. This is to meet the public’s need for assistance with substance abuse, domestic violence, and general mental health needs. Hanford will assist homeless prevention services by working with the Continuum of Care Kings/Tulare Counties. • Provide funding for youth programs and scholarship programs. 4 Goal
Name
Community Development Enhancement
Goal
Description
Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities
Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit
114
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c)
Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement)
The City of Hanford does not run a PHA.
Activities to Increase Resident Involvements
The Kings County Housing Authority and the city of Hanford are attempting more citizen participation by introducing a participatory budgeting process for the public and offering educational programs for employment training and entrepreneurship to promote economic growth in the community.
All residents also have the opportunity to attend and voice their opinions at regular city council meetings and provide feedback through various communication channels such as email, phone calls, and social media platforms.
CDBG funding will assist citizens in obtaining a sense of self-sufficiency and recognize the importance of involving their citizens in decision-making processes.
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902?
No
Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation.
Not Applicable
115
SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.215(h)
Like many other cities, Hanford's housing market faces challenges that make it difficult for its citizens to obtain adequate and affordable housing. These challenges are often interrelated and complex, making it challenging to find practical solutions. Based on a deep analysis of the housing market conditio ns, multiple reasons may impede citizens of the City of Hanford from obtaining housing, but the primary reasons are:
1. Lack of affordable housing
2. Cost of living versus wages
Affordable Housing
One of the primary reasons people in Hanford struggle to find housing is the need for more affordable options. As rental and housing prices continue to rise, many residents cannot afford to live in the city. This is particularly true for low -income families and individuals who are often priced out of the market. The housing market in Hanford has been stable over the last few years. However, with the influx of new residents and limited housing developments, prices still need to be put in the reach of a si gnificant portion of the population.
According to American Census Survey 2017 data, 18.7 percent of Hanford's population lives below the poverty level. This means that many residents need help keeping up with the rising cost of housing. Those seeking housing often commute long distances or settle for substandard living conditions.
More Job Training opportunities
Increasing job training opportunities can play a crucial role in alleviating the housing crisis in Hanford. Equipping residents with the skills needed for higher -paying jobs would make it easier for them to afford housing within the city limits. Training p rograms focused on growing industries within the region can help bridge the gap between the demand for skilled labor and the supply of trained workers.
Additionally, partnerships between local businesses, educational institutions, and governmental organizations are essential to create a sustainable ecosystem supporting job growth and housing affordability. These initiatives could lead to a more balanced housing market where a broader population can afford comfortable and stable accommodation.
116
SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d)
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City of Hanford, part of the Kings County Homelessness Collaborative, has caseworkers and stakeholders who get referrals for homeless individuals or families. The collaborative has established a referral system to connect those in need with the appropriate resources and services. This ensures that individuals and families experiencing homelessness can receive timely assistance.
Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
The city of Hanford, jointly with the housing authority of King County, has a development emergency and transitional housing for individuals in desperate need of housing or transitioning to permanent housing. The developments include new construction and adaptive reuse of existing buildings.
The emergency housing program is designed to provide immediate shelter for homeless individuals and families. These shelters offer temporary housing and support services like case management, counseling, and job readiness training.
In addition to emergency housing, the city of Hanford also offers transitional housing options. This type of housing is intended for individuals ready to move out of emergency shelters but still need additional support before transitioning to permanent hou sing.
Transitional housing programs typically offer longer -term stays and more intensive support services, such as life skills training and financial management education.
117
Programs that serve these vulnerable subpopulations include:
• Champions is a non -profit agency with comprehensive treatment programs for individuals struggling with mental health issues. The Champions oversee several transitioning housing locations to help integrate these individuals into society.
They also offer transitional housing for individuals moving from emergency shelters to permanent housing. This program provides a safe and supportive living environment while individuals work on rebuilding their lives.
• The West care Housing Program caters to individuals who struggle with substance abuse and mental illness. It aids those who need rehabilitation and will help them find permanent housing. The program is designed to aid those who need it the most, focusing on helping them achieve long-term stability and independence.
• Aspiranet is a non-profit organization that provides support and resources to youth exiting the foster care system. One of the services offered by Aspiranet is Transitional Housing, which assists young adults with finding safe and affordable housing as they transition into independent living.
118
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again.
The CoC will continue to improve helping homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing and independent living by:
• Continuing to use ’ready to rent’ best practices to foster financial literacy. • Continuing strong retention efforts, including case management, tenant associations, landlord outreach, budgeting, and tenant education efforts. Tenant associations meet monthly to strengthen relationships and promote housing stability.
• Connecting consumers to Mental Health and addiction treatment services and ensuring appropriate service delivery.
• Continue to promote assertive engagement with participants. Alliance Behavioral HealthCare and Housing for New Hope will continue to partner to ensure that crisis intervention services are available at Williams Square and Andover Apartments. • Housing providers will continue to partner with various stakeholders to transition LMI residents from Permanently Supportive Housing (PSH) into homeownership.
Six households have moved from PSH into their own homes through this partnership in recent years.
• To shorten the application process for individuals' emergency services or vouchers.
Help low‐income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially highly low‐ income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, em ployment, education, or youth needs.
The City of Hanford will continue supporting and collaborating with area service providers to help low-income individuals and families avoid homelessness.
119
SP-65 Lead-based paint Hazards – 91.215(i)
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards:
Hanford has 18,495 housing units, and 4,082 (22.1%) were constructed before 1980.
According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, lead -based paint was widely used in homes before it was banned in 1978. This means that many housing units in Hanford may contain lead -based paint. Title X significantly affected public health by decreasing the concentration of lead-based paint in residential housing units.
The reduction of lead-based paint concentrations in homes is not only beneficial for public health, but it also has environmental benefits. When lead -based paint deteriorates, it can release lead dust into the air, harming humans, and wildlife.
Therefore, the City of Hanford has implemented thorough measures to ensure the proper handling and removal of lead-based paint in residential buildings. These measures include mandatory inspections and remediation for homes built before 1978 and strict regulations for contractors and workers who handle lead-based paint.
Additionally, the city offers resources and education for homeowners to identify and safely remove lead-based paint from their homes. This proactive approach has decreased the potential exposure to lead -based paint in Hanford and has helped protect both residents and the environment.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?
The City of Hanford has implemented several initiatives to protect its residents from exposure to lead -based paint. One of these measures is conducting thorough testing on any purchased or renovated property to determine if the initial paint used was lead-based.
This proactive approach has been instrumental in preventing unnecessary exposure to this harmful substance.
120
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
The harmful effects of lead-based paint have been well-documented, especially for children and pregnant women. The City of Hanford has recognized the importance of addressing this issue, particularly for low-income families most vulnerable to its hazards due to living in dilapidated housing with limited financial resources. The City of Hanford has developed a comprehensive strategy for reducing lead -based paint hazards in response to this concern.
• Ensuring that the construction team is well -informed about the regulations regarding lead-based paint in federal housing programs is crucial in fulfilling lead - based paint requirements.
• We provide households participating in the City's housing programs with information about the dangers of lead-based paint.
• We carry out inspections and evaluations for lead-based paint when needed. • They enforce environmental control and abatement actions (for lead -based paint and asbestos) as mandated in federally funded projects.
121
SP‐70 Anti‐Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j)
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs , and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty‐Level Families
The City of Hanford has developed an asset -building strategy to address the anti‐poverty needs of the City of Hanford. This strategy aims to increase its residents' fiscal stability by focusing on programs that build assets, especially among low-income households.
The City's asset -building strategy aims to create a more financially stable community in Hanford. The City of Hanford hopes to reduce poverty and promote economic growth , focusing on programs that build assets, particularly for low -income households. By providing opportunities for residents to increase their financial resources and improve their financial management skills, the City aims to create a strong foundation for long -term success. The City of Hanford hopes to empower its residents and promote econo mic stability through this strategy.
The City of Hanford uses the Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program, which provides communities with low -cost, long -term financing for economic and community development projects. Section 108 financing allows communities to undertake more significant, costly projects where they may have limited resources to invest upfront. This program enables the City of Hanford to leverage its existing funding and resources to support a broader range of projects, ultimately improving the community's overall economic health.
• Activities eligible under Section 108 include:
• Acquisition of real property
• Rehabilitation of publicly owned real property.
• Housing rehabilitation eligible under CDBG
• Construction, reconstruction, or installation of public facilities (including street, sidewalk, and other site improvements)
• Related relocation, clearance, and site improvements
• Loan to for-profit businesses for economic development purposes. • Payment of interest on the guaranteed loan and issuance costs of public offerings • Debt service reserves
• Finance fees.
• Public works and site improvements in colonies
• In limited circumstances, affordable housing construction
122
How are the goals, programs, and policies for reducing the rate of jurisdiction poverty coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
The City of Hanford and county-funded programs aim to improve the lives of community residents by assisting them in purchasing a home. Mortgage assistance programs are created to encourage and support home ownership, which many consider a key component of wealth building.
This program is aimed at low-income individuals and families looking to purchase their first home. These programs often offer down payment assistance, closing cost assistance, or even provide loan guarantees that can help lower the overall cost of purchasing a home.
Homeownership is often seen as essential to financial stability and building generational wealth. It provides shelter and security for individuals and families and allows them to build equity and increase their net worth over time. Therefore, these programs are crucial in helping individuals and families achieve the dream of homeownership.
123
SP‐80 Monitoring – 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out further from the plan and ensure long‐term compliance with the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements.
The City of Hanford will continue to ensure compliance with all HUD requirements. The City of Hanford is committed to a comprehensive program of monitoring and evaluating the progress of all housing and community development activities. The goal of the jurisdiction is to ensure long‐term compliance with the applicable regulations and standards.
Compliance with HUD Requirements
The City of Hanford takes responsibility for seriously complying with all U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements . The city has implemented an ongoing program to monitor and evaluate its progress in meeting these requirements.
Monitoring and Evaluation Program
The city has established a comprehensive program to monitor and evaluate its housing and community development activities. This program includes regular reviews of financial records, site visits, and reporting to HUD on project progress. The focus of the monitoring plan will center on critical indicators demonstrating whether programs are operating effectively and efficiently.
These indicators will allow us to identify any issues or challenges hindering the program's success. The monitoring process will facilitate the evaluation of program accomplishments about the goals and objectives established by allowing the opportunity to review all programs and housing service providers to assess strengths, weaknesses, performance capabilities, and achievements. Both qualitative and quantitative methods of evaluation will be utilized, including determining the following:
• Compliance with eligible activities and national objectives • Progress against production goals
• Compliance with CDBG and HOME regulations, other program rules, and administrative requirements
• Timeliness in the expenditure of funds
• Completed and inspected housing units
• Performance on recordkeeping and file documentation
• Compliance with general accounting principles
• Accuracy in managing expenditure.
124
ANNUAL ACTION PLAN:
AP‐15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c) (1,2) Introduction.
The Community and Development Division is conversing with various private developers and owners who are willing to participate in developing the city. These private funds will be leveraged to improve our priority areas.
Program Source
of Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative
Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income:
$
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
Total:
$
CDBG Public-
Federal
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public
Services
$521,703 $398,895 $0.00 $920,598 $2,186,452
Hanford
anticipates an
annual funding
allocation of
$571,703 and
an estimated
Program
Income of
$398,895.
The City has
$1.5 million in
State HOME
program
income funds to
assist in the
plan to create
affordable
housing
opportunities.
Table 10 - Expected Resources – Priority Table
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
125
The City of Hanford intends to use leveraged resources through the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements. All potential allocations will be evaluated effectively to maximize the effort of federal funds received by the City of Hanford. The City of Hanford will couple CDBG funds with HOME investment funds to maximize the effort of federal funds received.
As part of the RFP process, potential bidders must submit a detailed plan outlining how to use leveraged resources to carry out their proposed project. This plan determines which bidder will best utilize the CDBG and HOME investment funds for maximum impact.
In addition to the RFP process, the City of Hanford will thoroughly evaluate all potential bidders to ensure they have the qualifications and experience to implement their proposed project successfully. This evaluation will consider past performance, financial stability, and relevant expertise.
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
N/A
Discussion
126
ANNUAL GOALS & OBJECTIVES:
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives, Goals Summary Information - Table 60 – Goals Summary Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Housing 2024 2025 Affordable
Housing
Citywide $398,479 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation: 50 Alternate Activity:
First Time Homebuyer: 2
2 Program
Administration
20240 2025 Program
Administration
Administration
Community
Development
$184,119
3 Public Services 2024 2028 Homeless
Non-Homeless
Special Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Community
Services &
Programs
Citywide Public Services
Shelter and Services for
the Homeless
Senior Services
Youth Services
$267,000 Public service activities for Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit:
Homeless 300 Persons
Assisted Public Service activities.
Senior Services: 300 persons
Scholarship Program: 73 persons
4 Community
Development
Enhancement
2024 20 Homeless
Non-Housing
Community
Development
City of
Hanford
Neighborhood
Preservation and Public
Facilities
Shelter and Services for
the Homeless
$1,100,000 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing
Benefit:
To be determined- Persons Assisted.
Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities
for Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit:
1 Facility
127
Table 11 – Goals Summary
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Housing
Goal Description The City of Hanford seeks to increase the affordable housing stock by supporting the planning, design, and construction of new housing units; homeownership through new or existing home buyer, including down payment assistance; housing rehabilitation including home improvement assistance programs, affordable rental housing construction for special needs families; the building or converting existing buildings for homeless housing; housing construction—partner with CHDO agencies for project work. 2 Goal Name Program Administration
Goal Description Planning and Administration of the City's CDBG Program. 3 Goal Name Public Services
Goal Description • The City of Hanford will address community and special needs through increased mental and behavioral health public services. This is to meet the public’s need for assistance with substance abuse, domestic violence, and general mental health needs. • Hanford will assist homeless prevention services working with the Continuum of Care Kings/Tulare Counties.
• Provide funding for youth programs and scholarship programs. 3 Goal Name Community Development/Enhancement
Goal Description Improving recreational spaces, supporting community and social service facilities, enhancing existing infrastructure such as streets and sidewalks, curbing and other public facilities lighting, and addressing public safety concerns. Improvements to local nonprofit community facilities such as youth or senior centers, emergency homeless shelters.
128
PROJECTS:
AP‐35 Projects – 91.220(d) Introduction:
One-Year Action Plans are required for each of the five years of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan. The Action Plan implements the strategies in the Consolidated Plan of addressing the housing needs of Hanford's deficient -, low-, and moderate-income citizens. All projects are approved and measured by the City's administration and must comply with the Consolidated Plan.
The projects also must comply with all local, state, and federal regulations.
Each project must be carefully evaluated and prioritized within each specific year of the Action Plan. This will ensure tha t resources are appropriately allocated and utilized while allowing for flexibility should any unforeseen changes or developments within the community. Additionally, the Action Plan provides transparency and accountability for each project regarding how government funds are utilized to address housing needs.
Depending on the project, some of the CDBG funding will be blended with other local, state, and federal sources for each project. This is to ensure that all resources are maximized and utilized effectively to address the housing needs of Hanford residents. The Action Plan also outlines each project's specific goals and objectives, along with a timeline for completion to stay on track with meeting the overall objectives outlined in the Consolidated Plan.
Furthermore, the Action Plan also includes a monitoring and evaluation component to measure the progress and success of each project. This allows for adjustments or modifications to be made to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved.
The City's administration oversees this process and reports on the results to the community.
129
Table 59 - Project Information
# Project Name
1 Program Administration
2 Homeowner Rehabilitation
3 Public Services- Commission on Aging
4 Public Services-Homeless Services-
KCAO
5 Public Service- Youth & Elder Adults
Scholarship Program - Parks and
Community Services
6 Community Development Enhancement
7 Public Services – Homeless
Collaborative -COC/KTHA
8 First Time Homebuyers
130
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs.
One-Year Action Plans are required for each of the five years of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan. The Action Plan implements the strategies in the Consolidated Plan of addressing the housing needs of Hanford's deficient -, low-, and moderate-income citizens. All projects are approved and measured by the City's administration and must comply with the Consolidated Plan.
The projects also must comply with all local, state, and federal regulations.
Each project must be carefully evaluated and prioritized within each specific year of the Action Plan. This will ensure tha t resources are appropriately allocated and utilized while allowing for flexibility should any unforeseen changes or developments within the community. Additionally, the Action Plan provides transparency and accountability for each project regarding how government funds are utilized to address housing needs.
Depending on the project, some of the CDBG funding will be blended with other local, state, and federal sources for each project. This is to ensure that all resources are maximized and utilized effectively to address the housing needs of Hanford residents. The Action Plan also outlines each project's specific goals and objectives, along with a timeline for completion to stay on track with meeting the overall objectives outlined in the Consolidated Plan.
Furthermore, the Action Plan also includes a monitoring and evaluation component to measure the progress and success of each project. This allows for adjustments or modifications to be made to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved.
The City's administration oversees this process and reports on the results to the community.
131
AP-38 Project Summary
Project Summary Information
1 Project Name Program Administration
Target Area Program Administration
Goals Supported Citywide
Needs Addressed All
Funding $184,119l
Description Effective and cost-efficient implementation of the CDBG program.
Target Date 06/30/2025
Estimate the number and type of
families that will benefit from the
proposed activities
N/A
Location Description Citywide
Planned Activities Program Administration
2 Project Name Homeowner Rehabilitation
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Create a suitable living environment.
Needs Addressed Ensure equal access to housing opportunities. Property Repairs Funding CDBG: $273,279
Activity: $246,279 Activity Delivery: $27,000
Description The City of Hanford will continue to offer the Emergency Repair Program. This program offers qualifying residents the chance to finance emergency home repairs. The program provides up to $24,999 per household. Repairs include but are not limited to roof repair or replacement, water meter replacements, heating and air repair or replacement, exterior painting, and accessibility. It is anticipated that 15 households will be assisted through the program.
Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number and type of
families that will benefit from the
proposed activities
Approximately 15 income-eligible homeowners’ people will benefit from the proposed activity.
Location Description Citywide
Planned Activities The City will fund 15 LMI homeowners for housing repairs and improvements.