Agenda packet — Hanford City Council, May 19, 2026 (part 8 of 12)

Page 956 of 1565 ends

Jurisdiction Name Site Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP Code Assessor Parcel Number Consolidated Sites General Plan Designation (Current) Zoning Designation (Current) Minimum Density
Allowed (units/acre)
Maximum Density
Allowed (units/acre) Parcel Size (Acres) Existing Use/Vacancy Infrastructure Publicly-Owned Site Status Identified in Last/Last Two Planning Cycle(s) Lower Income Capacity Moderate Income Capacity Above Moderate Income Capacity Total Capacity Environmental Constraints Optional Information1 Optional Information2 Optional Information3 City of Hanford E of 10th Ave, N of Florinda 93230 14181012000 MUC MX-C 14 29 0.177089073 Parking Area YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Not Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 1212 N 10TH AVE 93230 10121050000 MUC MX-C 14 29 0.908539945 Aged single-story commercial strucutre YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Not Used in Prior Housing Element 10 0 0 10 none present Buildings, 1k-5k sqr ft:1 None City of Hanford W of 10th Ave and S of Cameron St 93230 10132035000 potential to consolidate with 01 MUC MX-C 14 29 0.334251607 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 5 0 5 none present None City of Hanford N of Cameron, W of 10th Ave 93230 10121058000 MUC MX-C 14 29 0.180716253 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford NEC of 10th Ave and Cameron St 93230 14161015000 MUC MX-C 14 29 1.5 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 24 0 0 24 none present None City of Hanford N of 13th Road, W of Aquifer 93230 11010042000 MUC MX-C 14 29 5.26 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 84 0 0 84 none present None City of Hanford N of 13th Road, W of Aquifer 93230 11010043000 MUC MX-C 14 29 5.26 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 84 0 0 84 none present None City of Hanford E of 13th Ave and S of Hanford-Armona Road 93230 11040005000 MUC MX-C 14 29 13.3 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 213 0 0 213 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford N of Cameron St W of Mary St 93230 14161014000 MUC MX-C 14 29 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Planned YES - City-Owned Vacant Not Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford NWC of Mary St and Cameron St 93230 14161049000 MUC MX-C 14 29 0.56 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 9 0 0 9 none present None City of Hanford E of 10th N of Cameron 93230 14161050000 MUC MX-C 14 29 2.82 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 45 0 0 45 none present None City of Hanford N of 13th Road, W of Aquifer 93230 11010044000 MUC MX-C 14 29 5 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 80 0 0 80 none present None City of Hanford N of 13th Road, W of Aquifer 93230 11010041000 MUC MX-C 14 29 5.56 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 89 0 0 89 none present None City of Hanford E of 13th Ave and S of Hanford-Armona Road 93230 11040004000 MUC MX-C 14 29 21.15 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 338 0 0 338 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford SWC of 10th Ave and Hanford-Armona Road 93230 11440031000 MUN MX-N 14 29 2 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 32 0 0 32 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford SWC of 10th Ave and Hanford-Armona Road 93230 11440030000 MUN MX-N 14 29 4.18 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 67 0 0 67 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford SWC of 10th Ave and Hanford-Armona Road 93230 11440032000 MUN MX-N 14 29 4.64 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 74 0 0 74 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford SEC of 12th Ave and Fargo Ave 93230 8360028000 MUN MX-N 14 29 19.17 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 307 0 0 307 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford 440 N REDINGTON ST 1 93230 10261004000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford S of Center St, W of Redington St 93230 10261003000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.258264463 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford N of W 7th St, E of Cameron St 93230 12240052000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.264738292 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 717 W SIXTH ST 93230 12272014000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.226584022 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford S of W 6th St, W of 11th Ave 93230 12282031000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.233585859 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 1003 W SIXTH ST 93230 12282030000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.176767677 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 1121 W SIXTH ST 93230 12282054000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.27318641 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford S of W 6th St, E of Campus Dr 93230 12282084000 potential to consolidate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.334366391 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford 1005 W SIXTH ST 93230 12282032000 potential to consolidiate with 01 OR O-R 7 20 0.483700643 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 4 0 4 none present None City of Hanford 100 S 11TH AVE 93230 12272015000 OR O-R 7 20 0.635674931 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Not Used in Prior Housing Element 0 6 0 6 none present Buildings, 1k-5k sqr ft:1 None City of Hanford 719 W SIXTH ST 93230 12272013000 OR O-R 7 20 0.315955005 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present garage structure None City of Hanford 110 IRWIN CT 93230 10233010000 OR O-R 7 20 0.142699725 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 121 W MYRTLE ST 93230 10189004000 OR O-R 7 20 0.143480257 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 115 W MYRTLE ST 93230 10189005000 OR O-R 7 20 0.143480257 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 908 N DOUTY ST 93230 10183006000 OR O-R 7 20 0.146349862 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 823 W SIXTH ST 93230 12272005000 OR O-R 7 20 0.151928375 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 815 W SIXTH ST 93230 12272024000 OR O-R 7 20 0.179614325 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 814 W SIXTH ST 93230 12271015000 OR O-R 7 20 0.209136823 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 1628 N NORMANDIE ST 93230 10041004000 OR O-R 7 20 0.232438017 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 1109 W SEVENTH ST 93230 12281007000 OR O-R 7 20 0.315151515 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford 1159 W SEVENTH ST 93230 12281001000 OR O-R 7 20 0.528099174 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 5 0 5 none present None City of Hanford 1131 W SEVENTH ST 93230 12281047000 OR O-R 7 20 0.650642792 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 6 0 6 none present None City of Hanford 812 W SIXTH ST 93230 12271014000 OR O-R 7 20 0.23422865 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present aged residential structure on site None City of Hanford 1026 W SIXTH ST 93230 12281026000 OR O-R 7 20 0.209251607 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford S of W 7th St, W of 11th Ave 93230 12281013000 OR O-R 7 20 0.209963269 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 813 W SEVENTH ST 93230 12271036000 OR O-R 7 20 0.221418733 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 811 W SEVENTH ST 93230 12271037000 OR O-R 7 20 0.221418733 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 152 WALNUT ST 93230 12282009000 OR O-R 7 20 0.715105601 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 6 0 6 none present None City of Hanford N of 6th St, W of 11th Ave 93230 12281048000 OR O-R 7 20 0.860789715 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 8 0 8 none present None City of Hanford S of W 6th St, E of Campus Dr 93230 12282065000 OR O-R 7 20 0.954775023 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 9 0 9 none present None City of Hanford S of W 6th St, E of Campus Dr 93230 12282059000 OR O-R 7 20 1.439990817 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 13 0 13 none present None City of Hanford N of Grangeville Blvd, E of Rodgers Rd 93230 8460016000 potential to consolidate with 00 RHD R-H 14 29 0.206634527 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford N of Grangeville Blvd, E of Rodgers Rd 93230 8460015000 potential to consolidate with 00 RHD R-H 14 29 0.206634527 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford N of Grangeville Blvd, W of Rodgers Rd 93230 8410054000 RHD R-H 14 29 3.53 Small shed structures YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Not Used in Prior Housing Element 56 0 0 56 none present Buildings, 500-1k sqr ft:1, 1k-5k None City of Hanford 2397 N 10th Ave 93230 14670081000 RHD R-H 14 29 1.722910927 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Not Used in Prior Housing Element 28 0 0 28 none present None City of Hanford W of S Jordan Way, S of Hanford Armona Road 93230 11450037000 RHD R-H 14 29 0.5 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 8 0 0 8 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford E of Centennial Dr, S of Lacey Blvd 93230 11020033000 RHD R-H 14 29 1.41 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 23 0 0 23 none present None City of Hanford E of Centennial Dr, S of Lacey Blvd 93230 11020034000 RHD R-H 14 29 2.74 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 44 0 0 44 none present None City of Hanford E of 10 1/2 Ave, S of Hanford Armona Road 93230 11440017000 RHD R-H 14 29 5 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 80 0 0 80 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford E of 10 1/2 Ave, S of Hanford Armona Road 93230 11440027000 RHD R-H 14 29 14.6 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 234 0 0 234 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford N of 9 1/4 Ave, N of E Lacey Blvd 93230 14230090000 RHD R-H 14 29 2.25 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 36 0 0 36 none present None City of Hanford E of Centennial Dr, S of Lacey Blvd 93230 11020054000 RHD R-H 14 29 2.89 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 46 0 0 46 none present None City of Hanford S of Lacey Blvd, W of Centennial Dr 93230 11020056000 RHD R-H 14 29 8.55 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 137 0 0 137 none present Learning Center Planning Area None City of Hanford S of Millenium Way, W of Centennial Dr 93230 11020045000 RHD R-H 14 29 13.11 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 210 0 0 210 none present Learning Center Planning Area None City of Hanford 7536 10TH AVE 93230 7070002000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 2.27 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford 7584 10TH AVE 93230 7070003000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 2.41 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 4 4 none present None City of Hanford 9434 FARGO AVE 93230 14080099000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 2.67 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 4 4 none present None City of Hanford 8521 12TH AVE 93230 8410001000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 3.44 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 5 5 none present None City of Hanford 8539 12TH AVE 93230 8410032000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 3.44 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 5 5 none present None City of Hanford 11339 JONES ST 93230 11420039000 RLD R-L-5 2 10 2.5 Abandoned, dilapidated single-family residen YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Not Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 7 7 none present Buildings, 1k-5k sqr ft:2 None City of Hanford Ewell and Holt Ave 93230 12460039000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.14 Residential YES - Current YES - City-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Not Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 10796 THOMPSON DR 93230 11420041000 RLD R-L-5 2 10 3.09 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 7 7 none present None City of Hanford 382 THOMPSON DR 93230 11420056000 RLD R-L-5 2 10 4.19 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 11 11 none present None City of Hanford 10711 THOMPSON DR 93230 11420035000 RLD R-L-5 2 10 5 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 15 15 none present None City of Hanford E of Meadow View Road 93230 14400025000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 0.34 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford W of 10th Ave and S of Encore Dr 93230 7090026000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 0.36 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 2224 Vintage Pl 93230 9040002000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 0.750252525 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford 9304 Fargo Ave 93230 14080035000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 1.23 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford 1426 E FARGO AVE 93230 14080049000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 4.99 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 7 7 none present None City of Hanford N of Fargo, W of 43 93230 14080051000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 8.84 Vacant YES - Planned YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 none present None City of Hanford Meadow Ct 93230 14400016000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 0.47 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford SWC of Muscat and Vintage Pl 93230 9040042000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 0.736891644 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford N of Fargo Ave, W of Meadow view Rd 93230 14400033000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 1.16 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford Fargo Place, N of Fargo Ave 93230 14400002000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 2.53 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 5 5 none present None City of Hanford Intersection of Greenfield and Fitzgerald Lane 93230 10320115000 RLD R-L-12 1 3 4.17 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 8 8 none present None City of Hanford 1308 N Normandie St 93230 10051008000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.143480257 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 1433 N 11th Ave 93230 10081019000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.159389348 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 628 W Cameron St 93230 10091015000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.217309458 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford N of Middleton St, W of 11th Ave 93230 10091014000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.239049587 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford E of Middleton, N of Malone St 93230 10083024000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.23989899 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford Rodgers Road, E of Railroad 93230 10490021000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.743801653 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford Bernida Court S of Berkshire Way 93230 8410037000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 2.69 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 11 11 none present None City of Hanford S of Fargo Ave, Meadow View Rd 93230 14830003000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 4.88 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford S of Hume Avenue, W of Alpine Ave 93230 11110021000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 9.66 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 39 39 none present Southwest Planning Area None City of Hanford S of Lacey Blvd, W of 12 1/2 93230 11010010000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 38.89 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 156 156 none present Learning Center Planning Area None City of Hanford NWC of Houston and 12th Ave 93230 11040019000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 108 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 432 432 none present Southwest Planning Area None City of Hanford NEC of 12th and Fargo 93230 7360018000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 149.73 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Not Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 599 599 none present Northwest Plan Area None City of Hanford SEC of Flint and 12th Ave 93230 7010031000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 151.9 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 608 608 none present Northwest Plan Area None City of Hanford 775 Kimball Ln 93230 12310068000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.134986226 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford Parkside Drive 93230 11100066000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.158976125 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford S of Elm St, E of 10th Ave 93230 14186010000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.187327824 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford S of Florinda, E of 10th Ave 93230 14185002000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.188682277 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford S of Florinda, E of 10th Ave 93230 14185003000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.188682277 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford SEC of Beulah St and Grangeville Blvd 93230 14171074000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.196579431 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 612 Grant St 93230 12321002000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.211730946 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford Lee Circle 93230 11390013000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.215794307 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford SEC of Kimball and Davis St 93230 12310039000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.224977043 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford Washington St, W of Grant St 93230 12310043000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.358126722 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 1457 Beulah ST 93230 14171049000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.359848485 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 1616 Beulah St 93230 14162040000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.390266299 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford 1485 Beulah St 93230 14171039000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.463728191 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford N of Davis St, E of Garland Way 93230 12290029000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.476354454 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford 1463 Beulah St 93230 14171038000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.486937557 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford 1325 Beulah St 93230 14171040000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.56932966 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 2 2 none present None City of Hanford 1476 Beulah St 93230 14171070000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.64 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford 1455 Beulah St 93230 14171048000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.640495868 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford S of Grangeville, E of Beulah St 93230 14171072000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.7 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford 1452 Beulah St 93230 14162012000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.716253444 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford 1368 Beulah St 93230 14162014000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.757575758 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford 1365 Beulah St 93230 14171018000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 0.85 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 3 3 none present None City of Hanford 1357 Beulah St 93230 14171065000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.010009183 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 4 4 none present None City of Hanford 1511 Beulah St 93230 14171073000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.1 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 4 4 none present None City of Hanford 1364 Beulah St 93230 14162064000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.18 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 5 5 none present None City of Hanford 1405 Beulah St 93230 14171020000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.18 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 5 5 none present None City of Hanford 1458 Beulah St 93230 14162011000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.239990817 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 5 5 none present None City of Hanford Kenn Circle 93230 14472001000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.4 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 6 6 none present None City of Hanford S of Davis St, W of Grant St 93230 12310062000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.466161616 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 6 6 none present None City of Hanford 1397 Beulah St 93230 14171019000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.469995409 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 6 6 none present None City of Hanford 1598 Beulah St 93230 14162046000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.54 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 6 6 none present None City of Hanford 1512 Beulah St 93230 14162007000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.6 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 6 6 none present None City of Hanford 1492 Beulah St 93230 14162009000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.74 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 7 7 none present None City of Hanford 1402 Beulah St 93230 14162013000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.81 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 7 7 none present None City of Hanford 1057 E Grangeville Blvd 93230 14171011000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.98 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 8 8 none present Flood: Zone A City of Hanford S of Grangeville, E of Babe Ruth Rd 93230 14171012000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.98 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 8 8 none present Flood: Zone A City of Hanford S of Grangeville, E of Babe Ruth Rd 93230 14171042000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 1.98 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 8 8 none present Flood: Zone A City of Hanford 1025 E Grangeville Blvd 93230 14171041000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 2 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 8 8 none present None City of Hanford Kenn Circle 93230 14473006000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 2.310009183 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 9 9 none present None City of Hanford N of Hume, E of Shepard 93230 11420036000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 2.5 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 10 10 none present None City of Hanford Washington St 93230 12310046000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 2.73 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 11 11 none present None City of Hanford S of Grangeville, E of Babe Ruth Rd 93230 14171067000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 3.62 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 14 14 none present Flood: Zone A City of Hanford Intersection of 10th Avenue and SR 43 93230 14080078000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 4.4 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 none present None City of Hanford S of Grangeville, E of Babe Ruth Rd 93230 14171064000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 4.42 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 18 18 none present None City of Hanford S of Fargo Ave, Meadow View Rd 93230 14830002000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 4.91 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 20 20 none present None City of Hanford S of Thompson, E of Shepard Dr 93230 11420037000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 5.4 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 22 22 none present None City of Hanford N of Hume, E of Shepard 93230 11420034000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 7.5 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 30 30 none present None City of Hanford 12589 Hanford Armona Road 93230 11040007000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 21.12 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 84 84 none present None City of Hanford N of Houston, W of 11th Ave 93230 11110016000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 24 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 96 96 none present Southwest Planning Area None City of Hanford 11585 10 1/2 Ave 93230 11440014000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 40 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 160 160 none present None City of Hanford 11585 10 1/2 Ave 93230 11440015000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 55 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 220 220 none present None City of Hanford SWC of Hume Avenue and 12th Ave 93230 11040017000 RLD R-L-5 1 10 81.9 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 328 328 none present Southwest Planning Area None City of Hanford NWC of Douty and Cortner Sts 93230 8022018000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.201446281 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford NWC of Douty and Cortner Sts 93230 8022019000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.201446281 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford NWC of Douty and Cortner Sts 93230 8022020000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.201446281 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford NWC of Douty and Cortner Sts 93230 8022021000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.215817264 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 639 E Adobe Ct 93230 7480014000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.242424242 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 653 E Adobe Ct 93230 7480013000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.243227732 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford SEC of Mission Dr and Adobe Ct 93230 7480015000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.245982553 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 3352 N Bautista Ave 93230 7480029000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.266345271 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford N of Grangeville Blvd, E of Kings Road 93230 8410044000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 1.93 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 6 6 none present None City of Hanford E of Kings Road, W of the railroad 93230 8410043000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 14.88 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 45 45 none present None City of Hanford SWC of Capistrano and Bautista Ave 93230 7040042000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.239692378 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 3351 N Bautista Ave 93230 7480024000 RLD R-L-8 1 5 0.266437098 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 0 1 1 none present None City of Hanford 418 E CAMERON ST 93230 10121042000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.43 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 422 E CAMERON ST 93230 10121043000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.492011019 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 2 0 2 none present None City of Hanford 428 E CAMERON ST 93230 10121017000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.731795225 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford 587 E MALONE ST 93230 10121034000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.741988062 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Non-vacant/Underutilized Used in Prior Housing Element 0 3 0 3 none present None City of Hanford 218 E NINTH ST 93230 10272011000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.086088154 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 121 E THIRD ST 93230 12125006000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.086088154 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford 809 S PHILLIPS ST 93230 12192028000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.086088154 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford 811 S PHILLIPS ST 93230 12192029000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.086088154 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford 303 W THIRD ST 93230 12135008000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.091827365 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 512 N GREEN ST 93230 10224009000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.106749311 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None City of Hanford 712 N HARRIS ST 93230 10197005000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.111868687 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element 0 1 0 1 none present None Table B3: City of Hanford Land Inventory

Page 957 of 1565 ends

City of Hanford 402 E TENTH ST 93230 10215019000 RMD R-M 7 20 0.112075298 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford 431 E ELEVENTH ST 93230 10215020000 RMD R-M7 20 0.114784206 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford 412 S HARRIS ST 93230 12202005000 RMD R-M7 20 0.114784206 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford 610 E IVY ST 93230 10206016000 RMD R-M7 20 0.140036731 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford 701 N WHITE ST 93230 10206025000 RMD R-M7 20 0.140863177 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford S of Central Ave, W of Kaweah St 93230 10252011000 RMD R-M7 20 0.144628099 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford 710 S WILLIAMS ST 93230 12161012000 RMD R-M7 20 0.144628099 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford 327 E IVY ST 93230 10223005000 RMD R-M7 20 0.15392562 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford 326 E CAMERON ST 93230 10113013000 RMD R-M7 20 0.163269054 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford E of S Harris St, N of Hanford-Armona Rd 93230 12343028000 RMD R-M7 20 0.163980716 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present Flood Zone A City of Hanford 411 N HARRIS ST 93230 10272014000 RMD R-M7 20 0.170087236 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 601 E TENTH ST 93230 10283001000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford S of E 3rd St. W of S White St 93230 12115006000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present Flood Zone A City of Hanford 224 E SECOND ST 93230 12124008000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 315 W THIRD ST 93230 12135004000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 211 BALL PARK ALLEY 93230 12211009000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 207 BALL PARK ALLEY 93230 12211011000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 203 BALL PARK ALLEY 93230 12211013000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 312 E FIRST ST 1/2 93230 12212011000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 105 E SECOND ST 93230 12202002000 RMD R-M7 20 0.175482094 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 100 E LANG ST 93230 12221010000 RMD R-M7 20 0.195798898 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 107 W LANG ST 93230 12224004000 RMD R-M7 20 0.212121212 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 502 E NINTH ST 93230 10282013000 RMD R-M7 20 0.214807163 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 323 E MYRTLE ST 93230 10199005000 RMD R-M7 20 0.226423324 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 120 W LANG ST 93230 12221012000 RMD R-M7 20 0.229568411 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford 785 S HARRIS ST 93230 12343018000 RMD R-M7 20 0.231473829 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 306 E SECOND ST 93230 12116017000 RMD R-M7 20 0.258264463 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 126 E SECOND ST 93230 12125020000 RMD R-M7 20 0.258264463 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 404 E CAMERON ST 93230 10121022000 RMD R-M7 20 0.275206612 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford S of Cameron St, E of N White St 93230 10132025000 RMD R-M7 20 0.29033517 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford 115 E THIRD ST 93230 12125003000 RMD R-M7 20 0.299586777 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford 403 S IRWIN ST 93230 12201001000 RMD R-M7 20 0.307254362 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford 1760 EMMA LEE LN 93230 8460004000 RMD R-M7 20 0.34 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford 808 S PHILLIPS ST 93230 12191003000 RMD R-M7 20 0.371900826 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford 503 S IRWIN ST 93230 12221017000 RMD R-M7 20 0.386179982 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford 220 BRADEN AVE 93230 12172020000 RMD R-M7 20 0.439187328 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0404 none present None City of Hanford 1401 BRADEN AVE 93230 12171003000 RMD R-M7 20 0.516069789 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0505 none present None City of Hanford SEC of Kensington Way and Grangeville Blvd 93230 8270030000 RMD R-M7 20 0.711937557 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0606 none present None City of Hanford 11306 HANFORD-ARMONA RD 93230 12310022000 RMD R-M7 20 0.8 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0707 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford 1763 N 10TH AVE 93230 14153010000 RMD R-M7 20 0.82 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0707 none present None City of Hanford 722 S WILLIAMS ST 93230 12161015000 RMD R-M7 20 0.96620753 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0909 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford W of 12th Ave, N of Hanford Armona Rd 93230 11010014000 RMD R-M7 20 1.589990817 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 140 14 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford N of W Hanford Armona Rd, E of Kimball Ln 93230 12310023000 RMD R-M7 20 1.65 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 150 15 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor Oddly Shaped City of Hanford E of S Douty St, S of E Lang St 93230 12231003000 RMD R-M7 20 1.820890725 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 160 16 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford W of 12th Ave, N of Hanford Armona Rd 93230 11010019000 RMD R-M7 20 1.956795225 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 180 18 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford W of 12th Ave, N of Hanford Armona Rd 93230 11010017000 RMD R-M7 203 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 270 27 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford 712 S HARRIS ST 93230 12231029000 RMD R-M7 20 3.545913682 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 320 32 none present None City of Hanford 11232 HANFORD-ARMONA RD 93230 12310019000 RMD R-M7 20 4.73 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 430 43 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford 11741 S 11TH AVE 93230 11420031000 RMD R-M7 20 4.78 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 430 43 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford 11088 HANFORD-ARMONA RD 93230 12310016000 RMD R-M7 20 4.996028466 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 450 45 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford SWC of Fargo Ave and Glacier Way 93230 8360015000 RMD R-M7 205 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 450 45 none present None City of Hanford 1400 W GRANGEVILLE BLVD 93230 8670015000 RMD R-M7 20 5.75 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 520 52 none present None City of Hanford 11631 S 11TH AVE 93230 11420033000 RMD R-M7 20 9.67 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 870 87 none present None City of Hanford 12458 Hanford Armona Road 93230 11010027000 RMD R-M7 20 9.87 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 840 84 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford 12406 Hanford Armona Road 93230 11010026000 RMD R-M7 20 10 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 860 86 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford N of Hanford Armona Road, E of 12th Ave 93230 11010024000 RMD R-M7 20 10.22 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 870 87 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford N of Hanford Armona Road, E of 12th Ave 93230 11010022000 RMD R-M7 20 10.43 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 890 89 none present Hanford-Armona West Corrido None City of Hanford N of E 1st St, W of Green St 93230 12212019000 RMD R-M7 20 0.086088154 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford S of W 2nd St, W of Douty St 93230 12201004000 RMD R-M7 20 0.09 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present Oddly Shaped City of Hanford 217 W SECOND ST 93230 12172027000 RMD R-M7 20 0.106749311 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford E of Phillips St, N of Braden Ave 93230 12181014000 RMD R-M7 20 0.137626263 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford S of Carey St, E of 10th Ave 93230 14151033000 RMD R-M7 20 0.145224977 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford SWC of Jones st and Thompson Dr 93230 11380001000 RMD R-M7 20 0.152984389 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford SWC of Jones st and Thompson Dr 93230 11380002000 RMD R-M7 20 0.155073462 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford SWC of Jones st and Thompson Dr 93230 11380003000 RMD R-M7 20 0.155073462 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford SWC of Jones st and Thompson Dr 93230 11380004000 RMD R-M7 20 0.155073462 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford E of Phillips St, N of Braden Ave 93230 12172037000 RMD R-M7 20 0.163820018 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0101 none present None City of Hanford N of W 2nd St, W of Redington St 93230 12135012000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172176309 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford S of E 3rd St. W of S Brown St 93230 12124007000 RMD R-M7 20 0.172222222 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford W of Jones St, N of Hume Ave 93230 11380015000 RMD R-M7 20 0.182116621 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 1807 N 10TH AVE 93230 14151038000 RMD R-M7 20 0.20661157 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 1837 N 10TH AVE 93230 14151023000 RMD R-M7 20 0.218686869 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford S of Scott St, W of 10 1/2 Ave 93230 12192039000 RMD R-M7 20 0.229568411 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford E of S Douty St, S of E Lang St 93230 12224025000 RMD R-M7 20 0.23110652 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford E of 11th Ave, W of Jones St 93230 11380029000 RMD R-M7 20 0.27 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford W of 10th Ave, N of Cameron St 93230 10121047000 RMD R-M7 20 0.275482094 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford W of 10th Ave, N of Cameron St 93230 10121048000 RMD R-M7 20 0.275482094 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0202 none present None City of Hanford 704 S WILLIAMS ST 93230 12161053000 RMD R-M7 20 0.289256198 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford 11493 S 11th Ave 93230 11380027000 RMD R-M7 20 0.319214876 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford S of E 1st St, W of Green St 93230 12213007000 RMD R-M7 20 0.358126722 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0303 none present None City of Hanford N of W Hanford Armona Rd, E of Kimball Ln 93230 12310041000 RMD R-M7 20 0.518732782 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0505 none present Hanford-Armona East Corridor None City of Hanford 10911 THOMPSON DR 93230 11380043000 RMD R-M7 20 0.545867769 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0505 none present None City of Hanford S of Crass Ave, E of 10th Ave 93230 14152015000 RMD R-M7 20 0.996900826 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0909 none present None City of Hanford 11420 JONES ST 93230 11380008000 RMD R-M7 201 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0909 none present None City of Hanford E of 11th Ave, W of Jones St 93230 11380031000 RMD R-M7 201 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0909 none present None City of Hanford W of 10th Ave, N of Cameron St 93230 10121046000 RMD R-M7 20 1.019926538 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0909 none present None City of Hanford 876 LESLIE LN 93230 12310047000 RMD R-M7 20 2.79 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 250 25 none present None City of Hanford S of Crass Ave, E of 10th Ave 93230 14153011000 RMD R-M7 20 3.27 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-Owned Vacant Used in Prior Housing Element0 290 29 none present None 2357 1165 3212 6734

Page 958 of 1565 ends

Table A: Housing Element Sites Inventory, Table Starts in Cell A2 For Kings County jurisdictions, please format the APNs as follows: 999-999-999-999 Jurisdiction Name Site Address/Intersection 5 Digit ZIP Code
Assessor Parcel
Number Consolidated Sites
General Plan
Designation
(Current)
Zoning
Designation
(Current)
Minimum
Density
Allowed
(units/acre)
Maximum
Density
Allowed
(units/acre)
Parcel Size
(Acres)
Existing
Use/Vacancy Infrastructure Publicly-Owned Site Status
Identified in
Last/Last Two
Planning Cycle(s)
Lower Income
Capacity
Moderate
Income
Capacity
Above
Moderate
Income
Capacity
Total
Capacity Optional Information1 Optional Information2 Optional Information3 KINGS COUNTY 10TH & HOUSTON 93230 011-440-010-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 12.6 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 13 12 25 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 10TH & HOUSTON 93230 011-440-010-000 VERY HIGH DENSIT RM-1.5 24 29 3.67 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Used in Prior Housing 88 0 0 88 UNDERUTILIZED, FOUR RESIDENCES HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY GARDEN & SHAW 93230 016-140-065-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 1.41 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Used in Prior Housing 15 0 0 15 UNDERUTILIZED, ONE RESIDENCE HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY RAILROAD & FRONT 93202 017-070-054-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.53 Vacant YES - Current YES - City-Owned Available Not Used in Prior Hou 5 0 0 5 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY HANFORD ARMONA & 14TH 93202 017-310-009-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 6.91 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Used in Prior Housing 76 0 0 76 UNDERUTILIZED, 12 RESIDENCES ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY AMBROSE & FRONT 93202 017-070-060-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.08 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 0 1 0 1 ARMONA IRREGULAR LOT KINGS COUNTY 13910 LOCUST ST 93202 017-070-062-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.14 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 0 1 0 1 ARMONA IRREGULAR LOT KINGS COUNTY FRONT & AMBROSE 93202 017-070-059-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.65 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 7 0 0 7 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 145 GENERAL PETROLEUM AVE 93239 042-142-014-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 1.47 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 16 0 0 16 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY FIRST & MILHAM 93239 042-112-009-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.53 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 5 0 0 5 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY FRIEND & GENERAL PETROLEUM 93239 042-134-014-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.05 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY GENERAL PETROLEUM & SECOND 93239 042-149-008-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 1.21 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 13 0 0 13 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 219 CARTER ST 93239 042-134-001-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.14 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 0 1 0 1 SHED KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 412 NINTH ST 93239 042-122-022-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.12 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 431 BECKEY PEASE ST 93239 042-122-038-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 0.21 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 0 2 0 2 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY EMPIRE & 3RD 93266 026-162-004-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 2.61 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 28 0 0 28 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY EMPIRE & 3RD 93266 026-161-002-000 HIGH DENSITY RES RM-2 11 24 3.16 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable Not Used in Prior Hou 34 0 0 34 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY 6TH ST & D ST 93202 017-080-023-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.12 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 6TH ST & D ST 93202 017-080-023-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.17 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 SHED ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 14TH AVE & LACEY 93202 017-100-025-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 16.52 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 115 0 115 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 11462 10TH AVE 93230 011-440-007-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 4.98 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 10 9 19 NONE KINGS COUNTY 11462 10TH AVE 93230 011-440-007-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 3.31 Residential YES - Potential NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 23 0 23 UNDERUTILIZED, 1 RESIDENCE, MULTIPLE SHEDS NONE KINGS COUNTY SEVENTH ST & MILLHAM 93239 042-115-022-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.07 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY GENERAL PETROLEUM & SEVENT 93239 042-145-016-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.09 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY STANDARD OIL & FIFTH ST 93239 042-145-012-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.24 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY EMPIRE & 3RD ST 93266 026-120-039-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 4.61 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 32 0 32 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY 6TH ST & RAILROAD 93266 026-131-044-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 4.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 30 0 30 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY MAIN ST & HIGHWAY 41 93266 026-131-034-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.67 Agricultural/open spa YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 4 0 4 UNDERUTILIZED, AG ANIMAL SHADE STRSTRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY LAUREL & 20TH 93266 026-161-020-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.11 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 DIRT DRIVEWAY STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY LAUREL & 20TH 93266 026-161-019-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.28 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 DIRT DRIVEWAY STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY LAUREL & 20TH 93266 026-161-018-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.37 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 2 0 2 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY LAUREL & 20TH 93266 026-161-017-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.37 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 2 0 2 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY EMPIRE ST & 1ST ST 93266 026-120-066-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 7.11 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 49 0 49 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY EMPIRE ST & 1ST ST 93266 026-120-042-000 MEDIUM HIGH DENSRM-3 7 11 0.3 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 2 0 2 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY HOOD & OAK 93202 017-280-046-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 10.3 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 21 21 42 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 10952 CEDAR ST 93202 017-040-019-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.44 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 10721 BALM OF GILEAD 93202 017-070-007-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.13 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 10771 BALM OF GILEAD 93202 017-070-011-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.13 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 10640 BALM OF GILEAD 93202 017-070-027-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.11 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 14TH AVE & LACEY 93202 017-100-012-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 15.06 Vacant YES - Planned NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 30 30 60 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY JENSEN & PEACH 93202 017-020-061-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.31 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY LOCUST & JENSEN 93202 017-020-064-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.8 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 UNDERUTILIZED, ONE MOBILE HOME ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY HIGHWAY 198 & 14TH 93202 017-310-012-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 6.39 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 13 12 25 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY HIGHWAY 198 & 14TH 93202 017-310-012-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 7.98 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 16 15 31 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 109 THIRD ST 93239 042-148-008-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.14 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY BARBARA & JENSEN 93202 017-010-046-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 2.08 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 4 4 8 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY BARBARA & JENSEN 93202 017-020-065-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.7 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 1 2 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY LOCUST & CEDAR 93202 017-020-068-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 1.88 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 4 3 7 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY MARGO & LIBBIE 93230 011-480-128-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.06 Vacant YES - Current YES - Special Distric Available 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY TEMPLE & SHAW 93230 016-140-062-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 2.03 Vacant YES - Potential NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 4 4 8 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 6TH & GARDEN 93230 016-293-014-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.17 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 6TH & GARDEN 93230 016-293-015-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.15 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 9601 EASTVIEW DR 93230 016-294-007-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.14 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 9631 EASTVIEW DR 93230 016-294-004-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.14 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY GARDEN & 6TH 93230 016-294-015-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.14 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY GARDEN & 6TH 93230 016-293-013-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.31 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY CROSS & MULBERRY 93266 026-390-001-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.06 Vacant YES - Potential YES - Special Distric Available 0 1 0 1 STRATFORD IRREGULAR LOT KINGS COUNTY EDWARDS & NINTH 93239 042-114-018-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.06 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY EDWARDS & NINTH 93239 042-114-017-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.09 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY EDWARDS & NINTH 93239 042-114-016-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.04 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 STRATFORD IRREGULAR LOT KINGS COUNTY EDWARDS & NINTH 93239 042-114-006-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.07 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY KING & NINTH 93239 042-391-016-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.06 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY MILHAM & FIRST ST 93239 038-240-098-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 7.56 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 15 15 30 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY FIRST & MILHAM 93239 042-119-006-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.25 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY SECOND & GENERAL PETROLEUM 93239 042-142-003-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.14 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY FOURTH & STANDARD OIL 93239 042-143-002-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.14 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY FIRST & EDWARDS 93239 042-111-005-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.45 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 101 EDWARDS ST 93239 042-112-031-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.13 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 114 EDWARDS ST 93239 042-112-033-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.13 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 208 EDWARDS ST 93239 042-112-040-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.07 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 348 EDWARDS ST 93239 042-113-023-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.07 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 KETTLEMAN CITY NONE KINGS COUNTY 3RD ST & CROSS 93239 026-141-019-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.21 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY LANSING & EMPIRE 93266 026-120-061-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.42 Public facilities YES - Current YES - Special Distric Available 0 1 0 1 UNDERUTILIZED, UTILITY SHED STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY LANSING & EMPIRE 93266 026-120-061-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.32 Public facilities YES - Current YES - Special Distric Available 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, UTILITY SHED STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY 6TH ST & EMPIRE 93266 026-132-016-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 6.85 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 14 13 27 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY JOHNSON & SECOND 93230 002-252-007-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.17 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED HARDWICK NONE KINGS COUNTY 14650 JOHNSON ST 93230 002-253-009-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-6 4 7 0.37 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HARDWICK NONE KINGS COUNTY VISTA & LACEY 93230 014-251-022-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-8 4 7 0.2 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 9884 VISTA AVE 93230 014-251-039-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-8 4 7 0.32 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY VISTA & LACEY 93230 014-251-018-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-8 4 7 0.14 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED NONE KINGS COUNTY LACEY & VISTA 93230 014-251-027-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-8 4 7 0.11 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 9954 VISTA AVE 93230 014-251-016-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-8 4 7 0.38 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY ORCHARD & 10TH AVE 93230 016-171-084-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-8 4 7 0.28 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 2ND PL & ORCHARD 93230 016-172-016-000 MEDIUM DENSITY R R-1-8 4 7 0.07 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 1 0 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 11937 1ST PL 93230 016-182-014-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 2ND PL & GARDEN 93230 016-182-039-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 2ND PL & GARDEN 93230 016-182-040-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 2ND PL & GARDEN 93230 016-182-041-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 11890 2ND PL 93230 016-182-007-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 11837 2ND PL 93230 016-183-021-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 11775 2ND PL 93230 016-183-034-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 11832 3RD PL 93230 016-183-037-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY 11988 1ST PL 93230 016-181-026-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.33 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 HOME GARDEN NONE KINGS COUNTY LAUREL & EMPIRE 93230 026-161-016-000 LOW MEDIUM DENS R-1-12 2 4 0.37 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 STRATFORD NONE KINGS COUNTY 17668 IONA AVE 93245 023-040-050-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 10.7 Agricultural/open spa YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 10 10 AGRICULTURAL CROPS NONE KINGS COUNTY 14TH & SCHOOL 93230 009-150-024-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.73 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED GRANGEVILLE NONE KINGS COUNTY 13820 KANAWYER DR 93230 009-150-005-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.92 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 GRANGEVILLE NONE KINGS COUNTY 13900 KANAWYER DR 93230 009-150-028-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.62 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 GRANGEVILLE NONE KINGS COUNTY 8898 CHURCH DR 93230 005-050-007-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.35 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 GRANGEVILLE NONE KINGS COUNTY CHURCH & SCHOOL 93230 005-050-008-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.28 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 GRANGEVILLE NONE KINGS COUNTY CHURCH & SCHOOL 93230 005-050-014-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.28 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 GRANGEVILLE NONE KINGS COUNTY CHURCH & SCHOOL 93230 005-050-013-000 LOW DENSITY RES R-1-20 1 2 0.18 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING GRANGEVILLE NONE KINGS COUNTY 11770 10 1/2 AVE 93230 011-430-013-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.01 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 13159 13TH 93230 017-280-022-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 4 Agricultural/open spa YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 4 4 AGRICULTURAL CROPS ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 13TH & HOOD 93230 017-280-018-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.02 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 ARMONA NONE KINGS COUNTY 5 1/2 & HWY 43 93212 034-050-041-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.67 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 5 1/2 & NILES 93212 034-060-051-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.16 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 5 1/2 & NILES 93212 034-060-037-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 24132 CANAL RD 93212 034-080-013-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.03 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED NONE KINGS COUNTY 5898 NEWARK AVE 93212 034-080-034-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.92 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED NONE KINGS COUNTY 5814 NEWARK AVE 93212 034-080-031-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.92 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY NICE & 6 1/2 93212 034-101-018-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.96 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 23791 6 1/2 AVE 93212 034-101-027-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.4 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 6384 NILES AVE 93212 034-102-017-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.48 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 6418 NILES AVE 93212 034-102-019-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.48 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, TWO SHEDS NONE KINGS COUNTY 705 PICKERELL AVE 93212 034-160-017-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.89 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING NONE KINGS COUNTY 725 PICKERELL AVE 93212 034-160-016-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.94 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 DEMO DEBRIS NONE KINGS COUNTY PLYMOUTH & 6TH 93212 044-120-021-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 4.05 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 4 4 FLOOD ZONE A KINGS COUNTY NEWARK & 6 1/4 AVE 93212 034-101-007-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.5 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHED NONE KINGS COUNTY 10439 9 1/2 AVE 93230 016-042-075-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.45 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, SHEDS NONE KINGS COUNTY 7263 10 1/2 AVE 93230 007-030-008-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 10 Agricultural/open spa YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 10 10 AGRICULTURAL CROPS NONE KINGS COUNTY 10651 9 1/8 AVE 93230 016-043-044-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.42 Commercial YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 CONTRACTOR STORAGE YARD NONE KINGS COUNTY 11675 9TH AVE 93230 016-150-019-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 9 3/4 AVE & HANFORD ARMONA 93230 016-160-071-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 2.49 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 2 2 NONE KINGS COUNTY 9 3/4 AVE & HANFORD ARMONA 93230 016-160-062-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 3.02 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 3 3 UNDERUTILIZED, STORAGE STRUCTURES, VEHICLES NONE KINGS COUNTY LACEY & MAGNA CARTA 93230 009-050-030-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 8.11 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 8 8 NONE KINGS COUNTY LACEY & MAGNA CARTA 93230 009-050-031-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.67 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 10 1/2 AVE & HANFORD ARMONA 93230 011-420-014-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.2 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE KINGS COUNTY 11530 10 1/2 AVE 93230 011-430-001-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.86 Residential YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 UNDERUTILIZED, STORAGE STRUCTURES, VEHICLES NONE KINGS COUNTY 17TH AVE & HANFORD ARMONA 93245 021-050-007-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 11.25 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 11 11 CANAL TRANSECTS KINGS COUNTY 18TH AVE & INDIANA 93245 024-063-030-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 8.43 Agricultural/open spa YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 8 8 UNDERUTILIZED, AG ANIMAL SHAFE STRUCTURES NONE KINGS COUNTY 13557 18TH AVE 93245 024-064-032-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 11.25 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 11 11 CANAL TRANSECTS KINGS COUNTY 16TH RD & 16TH AVE 93245 017-170-042-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 0.74 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 IRREGULAR LOT KINGS COUNTY BLOWERS ST & FIRST ST 93230 002-251-015-000 VERY LOW DENSITYRR 1 1 1.91 Vacant YES - Current NO - Privately-OwnedAvailable 0 0 1 1 NONE Table B4: County of Kings Land Inventory

Page 959 of 1565 ends

Page 960 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: PUBLIC

PARTICIPATION
2024 – 2032 Housing
Element
April 2026
Prepared By:

Realty Planners Group
Cities of Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Staff
County of Kings Staff
Kings County Corcoran Hanford Avenal Kings (Unincorporated)

Page 961 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 2 Housing Element APPENDIX C: Public Participation Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
Housing Needs Survey Questions...................................................................................... 3 Kings County Stakeholder List........................................................................................... 6 Kings County Notice of Public Workshops.........................................................................10 City of Avenal Public Notice ...........................................................................................11 City of Corcoran Public Notice ........................................................................................12 City of Hanford Public Notice..........................................................................................13 City of Lemoore Public Notice ........................................................................................14 Additional Flyers and Communications............................................................................15 Community Workshop PowerPoint Presentations..............................................................18

Page 962 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 3 Housing Element Housing Needs Survey Questions
The following is a Housing Needs Survey prepared by county staff and shared to the cities of Avenal, Corcoran, Lemoore, and Hanford for public participation with comments received by November 27th, 2023.

Housing Needs Survey
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
November 2023

1. Do you live or work in Kings County? (Select all that apply.) a. Live in Kings County
b. Work in Kings County
c. Live and work in Kings County
d. Business owner in Kings County
e. Interested in Kings County housing issues
f. Neither

2. How long have you lived in Kings County?
a. Less than 1 year
b. 1-5 years
c. 6-10 years
d. 10-19 years
e. 20+ years
f. I do not live in Kings County

3. What’s your living situation?
a. Own
b. Rent
c. Live with family or friends
d. Unhoused
e. Other:__________________________________________________

4. What is your age?
a. Under 17
b. 18-24
c. 25-34
d. 35-44
e. 45-64
f. 65-74
g. 75+

5. What is your race/ethnicity?
a. White/Caucasian

Page 963 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 4 Housing Element b. Hispanic/Latino
c. Black/African Ancestry
d. Asian/Asian Ancestry
e. Native American or Indigenous
f. Middle Eastern
g. Two or more races
h. I prefer not to say

6. What is your total annual income?
a. Up to $35,000
b. $35,000 to $56,000
c. $56,000 to $72,000
d. $72,000 to $87,000
e. $87,000 to $97,000
f. $97,000 or more
g. Prefer not to answer

7. What percentage of your income is spent on housing costs (including mortgage or rent and utilities, property tax, and homeowners insurance)? a. Less than 30% of income
b. Between 30-50% of income
c. More than 50% of income
d. Does not apply

8. Select the top 3 housing priorities for Kings County. a. Increase the amount of housing that is affordable for moderate-, low-, and very low-income residents
b. More senior housing
c. Market-rate apartments
d. Code enforcement
e. Temporary housing for displaced families
f. Create programs to help existing homeowners stay in their homes g. Make it easier to build in Kings County
h. Improve substandard housing conditions
i. Increase homeownership opportunities for moderate-, low-, and very low-income residents
j. Target efforts to address inequities in the housing market, including discrimination in renting
k. Other: _______________________________________________

9. How well does your current housing meet your needs?
a. I am satisfied with my housing
b. My unit is in bad condition, and I cannot afford to make the needed repairs
c. I am unable to house additional family members

Page 964 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 5 Housing Element d. My unit is substandard or in bad condition, and I need my landlord to respond
e. I would like to downsize, but I am unable to find a smaller unit f. My unit needs improvements to make it easier to live with a disability g. None of the above
h. Other:_________________________________________________

10. What are the preferred types of homes you would like to see built in Kings County?
a. Single-family homes
b. Homes targeted for a specific purpose or population, including seniors, persons with disabilities, farm employees, permanent supportive housing (for people experiencing homelessness, transitional housing, etc.) c. Townhomes
d. Mixed-income housing
e. Low-density Multi-family housing (duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes) f. Higher-density Multi-family housing (15+ units)
g. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)/Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) h. Other:______________________________________________

11. There is insufficient housing in my community for (please select all that apply). a. Single individuals
b. Families with children
c. Low-income households
d. Older adults (seniors, elderly)
e. Persons with disabilities
f. I don’t know
g. Other:______________________________________________

12. Please identify the top barrier to affordable housing. a. Limited availability of affordable units
b. Quality of affordable housing does not meet my standards c. Lack of resources
d. Long waitlists
e. Cost of buying a home
f. Income limits on affordable housing
g. Senior living, both assisted and independent
h. Other:___________________________________________________

13. Are there strategies to meet housing needs that you believe Kings County should consider?

14. Please share any other comments you have related to housing in Kings County.

Page 965 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 6 Housing Element Kings County Stakeholder List
The following is list of Kings County Stakeholders prepared by the county May 26th, 2023.

LISA LEWIS

KINGS COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
1400 W. LACEY BLVD.

HANFORD, CA 93230

KETTLEMAN CITY CSD
PO BOX 66
KETTLEMAN CITY, CA 93239

ARMONA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
PO BOX 486
ARMONA, CA 93202

HOME GARDEN CSD
1677 2ND PLACE
HANFORD, CA 93230

STRATFORD PUD
19681 RAILROAD AVENUE
PO BOX 85
STRATFORD, CA 93266

JULIETA MARTINEZ
KINGS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP.
124 N. IRWIN STREET
HANFORD, CA 93230

CAROLINE FERRELL

CENTER ON RACE, POVERTY & THE ENVIRONMENT
1012 JEFFERSON STREET
DELANO, CA 93215

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF KINGS COUNTY
670 SOUTH IRWIN STREET
HANFORD, CA 93230

NANETTE VILLAREAL

KINGS UNITED WAY
125 W. 7TH ST
HANFORD, CA 93230

TODD BARLOW

KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION
1144 W. LACEY BLVD.

HANFORD, CA 93230

CORCORAN EMERGENCY AID
PO BOX 393
CORCORAN, CA 93212

KINGS COUNTY ACTION ORGANIZATION

JEFF GARNER
1130 N. 11TH AVE
HANFORD, CA 93230

LEMOORE CHRISTIAN AID
224 N. LEMOORE AVE.

LEMOORE, CA 93245

KINGS COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING

BOBBIE WARSTON
10953 14TH AVE
ARMONA, CA 93202

Page 966 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 7 Housing Element

THE SALVATION ARMY
LT. SHANNON BROWN
380 E. IVY STREET
HANFORD, CA 93230

KINGS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN

GABRIELA RODRIGUEZ
PO BOX 682
HANFORD, CA 93232

CHURCH OF THE SAVIOUR, SOUP KITCHEN

CAROLE FARRIS
519 NORTH DOUTY STREET
HANFORD, CA 93230

TACHI-YOKUT TRIBE
PO BOX 8
LEMOORE, CA 93245

SELF HELP ENTERPRISES

TOM COLLISHAW
PO BOX 6520
VISALIA, CA 93290

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY

BOB HUGHES
PO BOX 848
VISALIA, CA 93279

KINGS COUNTY VETERANS SERVICES

SCOTT HOLWELL
1400 W. LACEY BLVD., LAW BLDG #4
HANFORD, CA 93230

KINGS REHABILITATION CENTER
409 E HANFORD ARMONA RD
HANFORD, CA 93230

CYNTHIA ECHAVARRIA BARUCH

COMMUNITY PLANNER & LIAISON OFFICER
750 ENTERPRISE AVENUE
NAS LEMOORE, CA 93246

JIMMY HOOK

AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER
680 N. CAMPUS DR. SUITE B
HANFORD, CA 93230

CORCORAN JOURNAL
1040 WHITLEY AVE.

CORCORAN, CA 93212

HANFORD SENTINEL
300 W. 6TH ST
HANFORD, CA 93230

KEVIN ROBERTSON

KINGS COUNTY FARM BUREAU
870 GREENFIELD AVENUE
HANFORD, CA 93230

CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE
3747 E. SHIELDS AVE
FRESNO, CA 93726

CENTRAL VALLEY CHRISTIAN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
2222 W. SUNNYSIDE AVE
VISALIA, CA 93277

AMERICAN RED CROSS
208 WEST MAIN STREET SUITE B
VISALIA, CALIFORNIA 93291

Page 967 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 8 Housing Element

KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION EMERGENCY SVCS
1130 N. 11TH AVE
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA 93230

CHAMPIONS RECOVERY ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS

FRANK RUIZ
311 N. DOUTY ST.

HANFORD, CALIFORNIA 93230

TERRI KING

KINGS COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
339 W. D STREET, SUITE B
LEMOORE, CA 93245

UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
606 WEST SIXTH STREET
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA 93230

MICHELLE BROWN

MAIN STREET HANFORD
219 W. LACEY BLVD
HANFORD, CA 93230

MIGUEL PEREZ

KINGS TULARE HOMELESS ALLIANCE
PO BOX 1742
VISALIA, CA 93279

REFUGE ARMONA
PO BOX 1921
HANFORD, CA 93232

ANGIE DOW

KINGS AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORT
610 W 7TH ST
HANFORD, CA 93230

WENDY OSIKAFO

KINGS COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
1400 W. LACEY BLVD.

HANFORD, CA 93230

CASA OF KINGS COUNTY
101 N. IRWIN ST. SUITE 110B
HANFORD, CA 93230

KINGS COUNTY HOMELESSNESS COLLABORATIVE
1400 W. LACEY BLVD.

HANFORD, CA 93230

CENTRAL VALLEY REGIONAL CENTER

CHRISTINA SCOTT
5441 W. CYPRESS AVE.

VISALIA, CA 93277

GOLDEN EAGLE PANTRY

WEST HILLS COLLEGE LEMOORE
555 COLLEGE AVE.

LEMOORE, CA 93245

CITY OF AVENAL

KAO NOU YANG
919 SKYLINE BLVD.

AVENAL, CA 93204

CITY OF CORCORAN

KEVIN TROMBORG
832 WHITLEY AVE
CORCORAN, CA 93212

CITY OF HANFORD

JASON WATERS
317 N DOUTY ST
HANFORD, CA 93230

Page 968 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 9 Housing Element

CITY OF LEMOORE

KRISTIE BALEY
711 W. CINNAMON DR
LEMOORE, CA 93245

KINGS COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

CHUCK KINNEY
1400 W. LACEY BLVD.

HANFORD, CA 93230

KINGS GOSPEL MISSION
PO BOX 1124
HANFORD, CA 93230

Page 969 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 10 Housing Element Kings County Notice of Public Workshops
The following are copies of Kings County Public notices prepared regarding the proposed 2024- 2032 Housing Element Update and Fair Housing Analysis.

COUNTY OF KINGS

NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
& PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE PROPOSED
2024-2032 GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE & FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the County of Kings, California, will conduct a Public Workshop on Monday, November 6, 2023, at 7:00 pm to receive input from the public on the proposed 2024-2032 Housing Element Update and the Fair Housing Analysis. Each jurisdiction within Kings County (Kings County unincorporated and the Cities of Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford, and Lemoore) will conduct a Public Workshop for the Housing Element Update and the Fair Housing Analysis, as follows:
• City of Hanford – Joint Study with City Council & Planning Commission on Monday, November 6, 2023, at 4:00 pm, located in the City Hall-Training Room, 319 N. Douty St., Hanford, CA 93230 • Kings County unincorporated – Planning Commission & Public Workshop on Monday, November 6, 2023, at 7:00 pm, located in the Multi-Purpose Room, 1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Administration Building #1, Hanford, CA 93230
• City of Lemoore – City Council & Public Workshop on Tuesday, November 7, 2023, at 5:30 pm, located in the City Council Chambers, 429 C Street, Lemoore, CA 93245 • City of Avenal – Town Hall Meeting on Wednesday, November 8, 2023, at 6:00 pm, located in Avenal Theater, 233 E. Kings St., Avenal, CA 93204
• City of Corcoran – Planning Commission & Public Workshop on Monday, November 20, 2023, at 5:30 pm, located in City Council Chambers, 1015 Chittenden Ave., Corcoran, CA 93212 The Housing Element, a part of each jurisdiction’s General Plan, is required to identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs in order to preserve, improve and develop housing for all economic segments of the community, thereby affirmatively furthering fair housing policies and programs. The update will cover the County’s & Cities’ housing policies, goals and objectives for the planning period ending in 2032. In addition, the Housing Element will also include a fair housing analysis concerning fair housing enforcement, integration and segregation patterns and trends, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs in the city, and displacement risks.

Public Participation in the preparation of the Housing Element is a very important component of the planning process. The primary purpose of the Workshop is to receive the maximum public participation from citizens and stakeholders in the preparation of the Housing Element. The Workshop will provide participants with an opportunity to provide comments and to be involved in the plan-making process. Each jurisdiction (through its consultants) will answer any questions and record the public comments received at a meeting.

A Spanish interpreter will be present at the meeting.

Any person with impairment pursuant to the American Disabilities Act (“ADA”) who needs special accommodation for the Public Hearing or needs further information, please call the Kings County Community Development Agency at the number noted below.

Any person unable to attend the meeting may submit written comments to the Executive Secretary, Chanda Jackson, of the Kings County Community Development Agency, 1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Building #6, Hanford, CA 93230, or by email at [email protected] .

KINGS COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
/s/ Chuck Kinney
Chuck Kinney, Zoning Administrator
Publish: October 27, 2023

Page 970 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 11 Housing Element City of Avenal Public Notice
The following a notice of Town Hall Meeting for the Proposed 2024-2032 General Plan Housing Element Update & Fair Housing Analysis.

CITY OF AVENAL

NOTICE OF TOWN HALL MEETING ON THE PROPOSED
2024-2032 GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE & FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS Location: Avenal Theater
Address: 233 E. Kings St., Avenal, CA 93204
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Avenal, California, will conduct a Public Workshop on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 6:00 pm to receive input from the public on the proposed 2024-2032 Housing Element Update and the Fair Housing Analysis.

The Housing Element, a part of the City of Avenal’s General Plan, is required to identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs in order to preserve, improve and develop housing for all economic segments of the community, thereby affirmatively furthering fair housing policies and programs. The update will cover the City of Avenal’s housing policies, goals and objectives for the planning period ending in 2032. In addition, the Housing Element will also include a fair housing analysis concerning fair housing enforcement, integration and segregation patterns and trends, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs in the city, and displacement risks.

Public Participation in the preparation of the Housing Element is a very important component of the planning process. The primary purpose of the Workshop is to receive the maximum public participation from citizens and stakeholders in the preparation of the housing element. The Workshop will provide the participants an opportunity to provide comments and to be involved in the plan-making process. The City (through its consultants) will answer any questions and record the public comments received at the meeting. A Spanish interpreter will be present at the meeting.

Any person unable to attend the meeting may submit written comments to the (City/County Clerk) of the (City of /County of) ________________ (Name), (address), or by email at _________ or by fax at ___________.

Posted and published: ________________________________. _________________________
City/County Clerk
City/County of _________ (Name)

Page 971 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 12 Housing Element City of Corcoran Public Notice
The following a notice of Planning Commission Meeting for the Proposed 2024-2032 General Plan Housing Element Update & Fair Housing Analysis.

CITY OF CORCORAN

NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
& PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE PROPOSED
2024-2032 GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE & FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS Location: Corcoran City Council Chambers
Address: 1015 Chittenden Ave., Corcoran, CA 93212
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Corcoran, California, will conduct a Public Workshop on Monday, November 20, 2023 at 5:30 pm to receive input from the public on the proposed 2024-2032 Housing Element Update and the Fair Housing Analysis.

The Housing Element, a part of the City of Corcoran’s General Plan, is required to identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs in order to preserve, improve and develop housing for all economic segments of the community, thereby affirmatively furthering fair housing policies and programs. The update will cover the City of Corcoran’s housing policies, goals and objectives for the planning period ending in 2032. In addition, the Housing Element will also include a fair housing analysis concerning fair housing enforcement, integration and segregation patterns and trends, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs in the city, and displacement risks.

Public Participation in the preparation of the Housing Element is a very important component of the planning process. The primary purpose of the Workshop is to receive the maximum public participation from citizens and stakeholders in the preparation of the housing element. The Workshop will provide the participants an opportunity to provide comments and to be involved in the plan-making process. The City (through its consultants) will answer any questions and record the public comments received at the meeting. A Spanish interpreter will be present at the meeting.

Posted and published: ________________________________. _________________________
City/County Clerk
City/County of _________ (Name)

Page 972 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 13 Housing Element City of Hanford Public Notice
The following a notice of Planning Commission Meeting for the Proposed 2024-2032 General Plan Housing Element Update & Fair Housing Analysis.

CITY OF HANFORD

NOTICE OF JOINT STUDY
& PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE PROPOSED
2024-2032 GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE & FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS Location: Hanford City Hall-Training Room
Address: 319 N. Douty St., Hanford, CA 93230
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Hanford, California, will conduct a Public Workshop on Monday, November 6, 2023 at 4:00 pm to receive input from the public on the proposed 2024-2032 Housing Element Update and the Fair Housing Analysis.

The Housing Element, a part of the City of Hanford’s General Plan, is required to identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs in order to preserve, improve and develop housing for all economic segments of the community, thereby affirmatively furthering fair housing policies and programs. The update will cover the City of Hanford’s housing policies, goals and objectives for the planning period ending in 2032. In addition, the Housing Element will also include a fair housing analysis concerning fair housing enforcement, integration and segregation patterns and trends, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs in the city, and displacement risks.

Public Participation in the preparation of the Housing Element is a very important component of the planning process. The primary purpose of the Workshop is to receive the maximum public participation from citizens and stakeholders in the preparation of the housing element. The Workshop will provide the participants an opportunity to provide comments and to be involved in the plan-making process. The City (through its consultants) will answer any questions and record the public comments received at the meeting. A Spanish interpreter will be present at the meeting.

Posted and published: ________________________________. _________________________
City/County Clerk
City/County of _________ (Name)

Page 973 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 14 Housing Element City of Lemoore Public Notice
The following a notice of Planning Commission Meeting for the Proposed 2024-2032 General Plan Housing Element Update & Fair Housing Analysis.

CITY OF LEMOORE

NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
& PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE PROPOSED
2024-2032 GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE & FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS Location: Lemoore City Council Chambers
Address: 429 C Street, Lemoore, CA 93245
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Lemoore, California, will conduct a Public Workshop on Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 5:30 pm to receive input from the public on the proposed 2024-2032 Housing Element Update and the Fair Housing Analysis.

The Housing Element, a part of the City of Lemoore’s General Plan, is required to identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs in order to preserve, improve and develop housing for all economic segments of the community, thereby affirmatively furthering fair housing policies and programs. The update will cover the City of Lemoore’s housing policies, goals and objectives for the planning period ending in 2032. In addition, the Housing Element will also include a fair housing analysis concerning fair housing enforcement, integration and segregation patterns and trends, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs in the city, and displacement risks.

Public Participation in the preparation of the Housing Element is a very important component of the planning process. The primary purpose of the Workshop is to receive the maximum public participation from citizens and stakeholders in the preparation of the housing element. The Workshop will provide the participants an opportunity to provide comments and to be involved in the plan-making process. The City (through its consultants) will answer any questions and record the public comments received at the meeting. A Spanish interpreter will be present at the meeting.

Posted and published: ________________________________. _________________________
City/County Clerk
City/County of _________ (Name)

Page 974 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 15 Housing Element Additional Flyers and Communications
The following is a Kings County Planning Commission Meeting & Public Workshops Notice as well as Flyers for the event in English and Spanish.

NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
& PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE PROPOSED
2024-2032 GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE & FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS Location: Administration Building #1 – Multi-Purpose Room Address: Kings County Government Center, 1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Hanford, CA 93230 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the County of Kings, California, will conduct a Public Workshop on Monday, November 6, 2023, at 7:00 pm to receive input from the public on the proposed 2024-2032 Housing Element Update and the Fair Housing Analysis.

The Housing Element, a part of the 2035 Kings County General Plan, is required to identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs in order to preserve, improve and develop housing for all economic segments of the community, thereby affirmatively furthering fair housing policies and programs. The update will cover the County’s housing policies, goals and objectives for the planning period ending in 2032. In addition, the Housing Element will also include a fair housing analysis concerning fair housing enforcement, integration and segregation patterns and trends, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs in the city, and displacement risks.

Public Participation in the preparation of the Housing Element is a very important component of the planning process. The primary purpose of the Workshop is to receive the maximum public participation from citizens and stakeholders in the preparation of the Housing Element. The Workshop will provide the participants with an opportunity to provide comments and to be involved in the plan-making process. The County (through its consultants) will answer any questions and record the public comments received at the meeting. A Spanish interpreter will be present at the meeting.

KINGS COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
/s/ Chuck Kinney
Chuck Kinney, Zoning Administrator
Publish: October 27, 2023

Page 975 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 16 Housing Element

Page 976 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 17 Housing Element

Page 977 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX C: COUNTY OF KINGS
Kings County and Cities of 2024-2032
Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford Appendix C - 18 Housing Element Community Workshop PowerPoint Presentations
The following are PowerPoint Presentations for each jurisdiction conducted for the public by consultant and county staff during public workshops.

Page 978 of 1565 ends

PUBLIC WORKSHOP
2024-2032 HOUSING ELEMENT &
Fair Housing Analysis

KINGS COUNTY
Planning Commission Meeting, NOV. 6, 2023
7:00 P.M.

Page 979 of 1565 ends

PLANNING PROCESS
2 Public
Workshops
Draft Housing
Element for
Public Review/
PC Approval
Environmental
Analysis
Adoption of

HE & FHA

HCD REVIEW & APPROVAL

Page 980 of 1565 ends

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
3 Workshop –
Nov. 6, 2023
Public Review -
Draft HE & Fair
Housing
Analysis, Dec.
2023 - Jan. 2024
HE Adoption
April-May 2024

Page 981 of 1565 ends

A housing element is a Jurisdictions’s vision and a plan on how best to provide housing for all income groups within the City and affirmatively furthering fair housing.

The housing element must be updated every eight years.
4 What is a Housing Element?

Page 982 of 1565 ends

 Review and revise the Housing Element
 Incorporate new programs into the existing format
 Perform Site Inventory
 Include affordability level in Site Inventory (New)
 Include Programs to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing 5 Steps in Updating Housing Element?

Page 983 of 1565 ends

What is Fair Housing Analysis?

1. Outreach

2. Assessment of Fair Housing
a. Key Data and Background Information
b. Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity
c. Integration and Segregation Patterns and Trends
d. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty e. Disparities in Access to Opportunity
f. Disproportionate Housing Needs in the Jurisdiction
g. Displacement Risk

3. Sites Inventory

4. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions 6

Page 984 of 1565 ends

PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
7 Preliminary Observations of the Housing Element
and Fair Housing Analyses are as follows:

Page 985 of 1565 ends

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ▰ Total Population: 32,773 ▰ Household Population: 30,074 ▰ Hispanic or Latino: 50.7% ▰ Households: 9,244 ▰ Owner occupied: 46.50% ▰ Persons per HH: N/A ▰ Median HH Income: N/A ▰ Poverty: N/A Source: Census, ACS, CA DOF
8

Page 986 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
9 1. Diversity Index (Racial and Ethnic Diversity): 1 to 100%

2. GINI Index (Income Disparity): 1 to 10

3. Dissimilarity Index (uneven distribution of racial or ethnic populations in different neighborhoods).

FAIR HOUSING ISSUES THAT WILL BE ANALYZED:

Page 987 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
10 4. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated area of Poverty (R/ECAP).

The correlation assumes that the lower the income,
the higher the diversity of population.

5. Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA):

Any census block in the city with a median
household income of $125,000 and a population that is 80 percent or more white.

Page 988 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
11 6. Disparities in Access to Opportunities:

Census tracts are categorized as Highest
Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, Moderate
Resource (Rapidly Changing), Low Resource, or areas of High Segregation and Poverty.

Page 989 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
12 7. Disproportionate Housing Needs.

Over payment, Cost burdens

8. Displacement
Displacement occurs when households are forced
to move because they are evicted or their building was torn down, often to make way for new and more expensive
development.

Page 990 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
13 9. Site Inventory
The RHNA sites not concentrated in areas with high
racial or ethnic populations, persons with disabilities, femaleheaded households, senior households, or Low-and-moderate income (LMI) households.

Page 991 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
14 10. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions:

The programs in the Housing Element previously
discussed are created in light of the findings of the fair housing analysis and needs of the community.

Page 992 of 1565 ends

6th CYCLE RHNA ALLOCATION
15 Jurisdiction RHNA
Allocation
Percent of
Total
Avenal 277 3 %
Corcoran 715 8 %
Hanford 5547 59 %
Lemoore 2329 25 %
Unincorporated 561 6 %
TOTAL 9429 100 %

Page 993 of 1565 ends

QUANTITATIVE HOUSING OBJECTIVES
16 Housing/Type Extremely
Low Income /
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
RHNA 6th Cycle Allocation 132 89 106 234 561
New Construction
Rehabilitation
Conservation/Rehabilitation

Page 994 of 1565 ends

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Update and ensure that the housing element amendments are internally consistent and compatible with the other elements of the general plan. 17

Page 995 of 1565 ends

CEQA
18  California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
 Common Sense Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)).

Page 996 of 1565 ends

COMMUNITY INPUT
19  Questions from the participants at the workshop
 What are the housing challenges facing the County?
 What opportunities are available to the County to support housing needs?  What should the top five priorities be?
 Fair Housing issues, complaints and recommendations.

Page 997 of 1565 ends

NEXT STEPS
20 PREPARE DRAFT
HE and FHA

HCD REVIEW,
JURISDICTION’S

RESPONSE AND

HCD APPROVAL

ADOPTION OF

HE & FHA
HCD

CERTIFICATION

Page 998 of 1565 ends

OPEN PUBLIC MEETING
▰ Open floor for public comments.
21

Page 999 of 1565 ends

22 Thank you
Please send your comments by mail or email to the KINGS COUNTY Planning Department.

Kings County Community Development Agency
Attn: Noelle Tomlinson
1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Building #6
Hanford, CA 93230
[email protected]
[email protected]

Page 1000 of 1565 ends

PUBLIC WORKSHOP
2024-2032 HOUSING ELEMENT &
Fair Housing Analysis

CITY OF AVENAL
Town Hall Meeting, NOV. 8, 2023
6:00 P.M.

Page 1001 of 1565 ends

PLANNING PROCESS
2 Public
Workshops
Draft Housing
Element for
Public Review/
PC Approval
Environmental
Analysis
Adoption of

HE & FHA

HCD REVIEW & APPROVAL

Page 1002 of 1565 ends

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
3 Workshop –
Nov. 8, 2023
Public Review -
Draft HE & Fair
Housing
Analysis, Dec.
2023 - Jan. 2024
HE Adoption
April-May 2024

Page 1003 of 1565 ends

A housing element is a Jurisdictions’s vision and a plan on how best to provide housing for all income groups within the City and affirmatively furthering fair housing.

The housing element must be updated every eight years.
4 What is a Housing Element?

Page 1004 of 1565 ends

Page 1005 of 1565 ends

What is Fair Housing Analysis?

1. Outreach

3. Sites Inventory

4. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions 6

Page 1006 of 1565 ends

PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
7 Preliminary Observations of the Housing Element
and Fair Housing Analyses are as follows:

Page 1007 of 1565 ends

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ▰ Total Population: 13,033 ▰ Household Population: 9,406 ▰ Hispanic or Latino: 87% ▰ Households: 2,752 ▰ Owner occupied: 47.46% ▰ Persons per HH: 2.74 ▰ Median HH Income: $49,781 ▰ Poverty: 25.6% Source: Census, ACS, CA DOF
8

Page 1008 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
9 1. Diversity Index (Racial and Ethnic Diversity): 1 to 100%

2. GINI Index (Income Disparity): 1 to 10

3. Dissimilarity Index (uneven distribution of racial or ethnic populations in different neighborhoods).

FAIR HOUSING ISSUES THAT WILL BE ANALYZED:

Page 1009 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
10 4. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated area of Poverty (R/ECAP).

The correlation assumes that the lower the income,
the higher the diversity of population.

5. Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA):

Any census block in the city with a median
household income of $125,000 and a population that is 80 percent or more white.

Page 1010 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
11 6. Disparities in Access to Opportunities:

Census tracts are categorized as Highest
Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, Moderate
Resource (Rapidly Changing), Low Resource, or areas of High Segregation and Poverty.

Page 1011 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
12 7. Disproportionate Housing Needs.

Over payment, Cost burdens

8. Displacement
Displacement occurs when households are forced
to move because they are evicted or their building was torn down, often to make way for new and more expensive
development.

Page 1012 of 1565 ends

Page 1013 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
14 10. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions:

The programs in the Housing Element previously
discussed are created in light of the findings of the fair housing analysis and needs of the community.

Page 1014 of 1565 ends

6th CYCLE RHNA ALLOCATION
15 Jurisdiction RHNA
Allocation
Percent of
Total
Avenal 277 3 %
Corcoran 715 8 %
Hanford 5547 59 %
Lemoore 2329 25 %
Unincorporated 561 6 %
TOTAL 9429 100 %

Page 1015 of 1565 ends

QUANTITATIVE HOUSING OBJECTIVES
16 Housing/Type Extremely
Low Income
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate &
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
RHNA 6th Cycle Allocation
Remaining Obligations from 5th
Cycle
Total Housing Obligations
New Construction
Rehabilitation
Conservation/Rehabilitation

Page 1016 of 1565 ends

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Update and ensure that the housing element amendments are internally consistent and compatible with the other elements of the general plan. 17

Page 1017 of 1565 ends

CEQA
18  California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
 Common Sense Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)).

Page 1018 of 1565 ends

COMMUNITY INPUT
19  Questions from the participants at the workshop
 What are the housing challenges facing the City?
 What opportunities are available to the City to support housing needs?  What should the top five priorities be?
 Fair Housing issues, complaints and recommendations.

Page 1019 of 1565 ends

NEXT STEPS
20 PREPARE DRAFT
HE and FHA

HCD REVIEW,
JURISDICTION’S

RESPONSE AND

HCD APPROVAL

ADOPTION OF

HE & FHA
HCD

CERTIFICATION

Page 1020 of 1565 ends

OPEN PUBLIC MEETING
▰ Open floor for public comments.
21

Page 1021 of 1565 ends

22 Thank you
Please send your comments by mail or email to the City’s Planning Department.

Page 1022 of 1565 ends

PUBLIC WORKSHOP
2024-2032 HOUSING ELEMENT &
Fair Housing Analysis

CITY OF CORCORAN
Planning Commission Meeting, NOV. 20, 2023
5:30 P.M.

Page 1023 of 1565 ends

PLANNING PROCESS
2 Public
Workshops
Draft Housing
Element for
Public Review/
PC Approval
Environmental
Analysis
Adoption of

HE & FHA

HCD REVIEW & APPROVAL

Page 1024 of 1565 ends

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
3 Workshop –
Nov. 20, 2023
Public Review -
Draft HE & Fair
Housing
Analysis, Dec.
2023 - Jan. 2024
HE Adoption
April-May 2024

Page 1025 of 1565 ends

A housing element is a Jurisdictions’s vision and a plan on how best to provide housing for all income groups within the City and affirmatively furthering fair housing.

The housing element must be updated every eight years.
4 What is a Housing Element?

Page 1026 of 1565 ends

Page 1027 of 1565 ends

What is Fair Housing Analysis?

1. Outreach

3. Sites Inventory

4. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions 6

Page 1028 of 1565 ends

PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
7 Preliminary Observations of the Housing Element
and Fair Housing Analyses are as follows:

Page 1029 of 1565 ends

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ▰ Total Population: 22,078 ▰ Household Population: 13,525 ▰ Hispanic or Latino: 69.30% ▰ Households: 3,845 ▰ Owner occupied: 46.53% ▰ Persons per HH: 3.42 ▰ Median HH Income: $42,997 ▰ Poverty: 27.6% Source: Census, ACS, CA DOF
8

Page 1030 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
9 1. Diversity Index (Racial and Ethnic Diversity): 1 to 100%

2. GINI Index (Income Disparity): 1 to 10

3. Dissimilarity Index (uneven distribution of racial or ethnic populations in different neighborhoods).

FAIR HOUSING ISSUES THAT WILL BE ANALYZED:

Page 1031 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
10 4. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated area of Poverty (R/ECAP).

The correlation assumes that the lower the income,
the higher the diversity of population.

5. Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA):

Any census block in the city with a median
household income of $125,000 and a population that is 80 percent or more white.

Page 1032 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
11 6. Disparities in Access to Opportunities:

Census tracts are categorized as Highest
Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, Moderate
Resource (Rapidly Changing), Low Resource, or areas of High Segregation and Poverty.

Page 1033 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
12 7. Disproportionate Housing Needs.

Over payment, Cost burdens

8. Displacement
Displacement occurs when households are forced
to move because they are evicted or their building was torn down, often to make way for new and more expensive
development.

Page 1034 of 1565 ends

Page 1035 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
14 10. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions:

The programs in the Housing Element previously
discussed are created in light of the findings of the fair housing analysis and needs of the community.

Page 1036 of 1565 ends

6th CYCLE RHNA ALLOCATION
15 Jurisdiction RHNA
Allocation
Percent of
Total
Avenal 277 3 %
Corcoran 715 8 %
Hanford 5547 59 %
Lemoore 2329 25 %
Unincorporated 561 6 %
TOTAL 9429 100 %

Page 1037 of 1565 ends

Page 1038 of 1565 ends

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Update and ensure that the housing element amendments are internally consistent and compatible with the other elements of the general plan. 17

Page 1039 of 1565 ends

CEQA
18  California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
 Common Sense Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)).

Page 1040 of 1565 ends

Page 1041 of 1565 ends

NEXT STEPS
20 PREPARE DRAFT
HE and FHA

HCD REVIEW,
JURISDICTION’S

RESPONSE AND

HCD APPROVAL

ADOPTION OF

HE & FHA
HCD

CERTIFICATION

Page 1042 of 1565 ends

OPEN PUBLIC MEETING
▰ Open floor for public comments.
21

Page 1043 of 1565 ends

22 Thank you
Please send your comments by mail or email to the City’s Planning Department.

Page 1044 of 1565 ends

PUBLIC WORKSHOP
2024-2032 HOUSING ELEMENT &
Fair Housing Analysis

CITY OF HANFORD
JOINT CC/PC MEETING, NOV. 6, 2023
4:00 P.M.

Page 1045 of 1565 ends

PLANNING PROCESS
2 Public
Workshops
Draft Housing
Element for
Public Review/
PC Approval
Environmental
Analysis
Adoption of

HE & FHA

HCD REVIEW & APPROVAL

Page 1046 of 1565 ends

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
3 Workshop –
Nov. 6, 2023
Public Review -
Draft HE & Fair
Housing
Analysis,
Dec.2023 - Jan.
2024
HE Adoption
April – May 2024

Page 1047 of 1565 ends

A housing element is a City’s vision and a plan on how best to provide housing for all income groups within the City and affirmatively furthering fair housing.

The housing element must be updated every eight years.
4 What is a Housing Element?

Page 1048 of 1565 ends

Page 1049 of 1565 ends

What is Fair Housing Analysis?

1. Outreach

3. Sites Inventory

4. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions 6

Page 1050 of 1565 ends

PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
7 Preliminary Observations of the Housing Element
and Fair Housing Analyses are as follows:

Page 1051 of 1565 ends

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ▰ Total Population: 57,339 ▰ Household Population: 56,945 ▰ Hispanic or Latino: 49.9% ▰ Households: 18,960 ▰ Owner occupied: 59.88% ▰ Persons per HH: 3.0 ▰ Median HH Income: $65,974 ▰ Poverty: 15.5% Source: Census, ACS, CA DOF
8

Page 1052 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
9 1. Diversity Index (Racial and Ethnic Diversity): 1 to 100%

2. GINI Index (Income Disparity): 1 to 10

3. Dissimilarity Index (uneven distribution of racial or ethnic populations in different neighborhoods).

FAIR HOUSING ISSUES THAT WILL BE ANALYZED:

Page 1053 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
10 4. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated area of Poverty (R/ECAP).

The correlation assumes that the lower the income,
the higher the diversity of population.

5. Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA):

Any census block in the city with a median
household income of $125,000 and a population that is 80 percent or more white.

Page 1054 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
11 6. Disparities in Access to Opportunities:

Census tracts are categorized as Highest
Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, Moderate
Resource (Rapidly Changing), Low Resource, or areas of High Segregation and Poverty.

Page 1055 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
12 7. Disproportionate Housing Needs.

Over payment, Cost burdens

8. Displacement
Displacement occurs when households are forced
to move because they are evicted or their building was torn down, often to make way for new and more expensive
development.

Page 1056 of 1565 ends

Page 1057 of 1565 ends

FAIR HOUSING INDICATORS
14 10. Identification of Contributing Factors, Goals and Actions:

The programs in the Housing Element previously
discussed are created in light of the findings of the fair housing analysis and needs of the community.

Page 1058 of 1565 ends

6th CYCLE RHNA ALLOCATION
15 Jurisdiction RHNA
Allocation
Percent of
Total
Avenal 277 3 %
Corcoran 715 8 %
Hanford 5547 59 %
Lemoore 2329 25 %
Unincorporated 561 6 %
TOTAL 9429 100 %

Page 1059 of 1565 ends

Page 1060 of 1565 ends

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Update and ensure that the housing element amendments are internally consistent and compatible with the other elements of the general plan. 17

Page 1061 of 1565 ends

CEQA
18  California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
 Common Sense Exemption, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)).

Page 1062 of 1565 ends

Page 1063 of 1565 ends

NEXT STEPS
20 PREPARE DRAFT
HE and FHA

HCD REVIEW,
JURISDICTION’S

RESPONSE AND

HCD APPROVAL

ADOPTION OF

HE & FHA
HCD

CERTIFICATION

Page 1064 of 1565 ends

OPEN PUBLIC MEETING
▰ Open floor for public comments.
21

Page 1065 of 1565 ends

22 Thank you
Please send your comments by mail or email to the City of Hanford Planning Department.

Page 1066 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS
(UNINCORPORATED)

FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
April 2026
Kings County • Corcran • Hanford • Avenal • Kings (Unincorporated)

Page 1067 of 1565 ends

Prepared By:

Realty Planners Group
Kings County Staff

Page 1068 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 1 APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS (UNINCORPORATED) FAIR

HOUSING ANALYSIS
Contents
A. LOCAL ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING _________________________________5 Introduction______________________________________________________________________ 5 Outreach Program ________________________________________________________________________6 Community Workshops ____________________________________________________________________7 B. ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING ISSUES ________________________________9 Key Data And Background Information ______________________________________________ 9 Local Patterns of Integration and Segregation _________________________________________ 11 Enforcement and Outreach Capacity ________________________________________________ 11 Enforcement Capacity ____________________________________________________________________11 Outreach Capacity _______________________________________________________________________11 Complaint Data and Patterns _______________________________________________________________11 Compliance with Fair Housing Laws_________________________________________________________14 Racial and Ethnic Characteristics ___________________________________________________ 14 Racial/Ethnic Areas of Concentration of Poverty (R/ECAP) and Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA) _______________________________________________________________________________14 Income Distribution ______________________________________________________________ 19 Median Household Income ________________________________________________________________19 Poverty________________________________________________________________________________21 Extremely Low Income Households ____________________________________________________21 Special Housing Needs ____________________________________________________________ 24 Familial Status __________________________________________________________________________24 Female-headed households ________________________________________________________________25 Elderly: _______________________________________________________________________________26 Large Families _________________________________________________________________________216 Persons with Disabilities _________________________________________________________________216 Access to Opportunities____________________________________________________________ 33 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Areas ____________________________________________________ 33 Transit Mobility _________________________________________________________________________36 Housing Mobility________________________________________________________________________39 Employment____________________________________________________________________________40 Jobs-Housing Balance and Commute Patterns _________________________________________________42 Education ______________________________________________________________________________44 Environmental Health ____________________________________________________________________46 Disproportionate Housing Needs, Including Displacement Risk __________________________ 46 Overcrowding __________________________________________________________________________47 Overpayment ___________________________________________________________________________48 Housing Conditions ______________________________________________________________________53 Extremely Low-Income Households _________________________________________________________53 Homelessness___________________________________________________________________________55 Displacement Risk _______________________________________________________________________57

Page 1069 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 1 Identified Sites and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) ______________________ 60 Emergency Shelter Compliance_____________________________________________________ 61 Development Standards in the PF Zone_______________________________________________________61 Suitability of the PF Zone _________________________________________________________________61 Employee Housing and Farmworker Compliance______________________________________ 61 Employee Housing_______________________________________________________________________61 Farmworkers ___________________________________________________________________________62 C. HOUSING CONSTRAINTS_______________________________________________66 Governmental Constraints_________________________________________________________ 66 General Plan Designations and Zoning Districts_________________________________________________66 Housing for Persons with Disabilities ________________________________________________________67 Processing and Permit Procedures Analysis ____________________________________________________68 Suitability and Availability of Infrastructure ___________________________________________________69 Non-Governmental Constraints_____________________________________________________ 70 Environmental Constraints ________________________________________________________ 71 D. LOCAL DATA AND KNOWLEDGE AND OTHER RELEVANT FACTORS _______75 Segregation and Integration________________________________________________________ 75 Disparities in Access to Opportunity_________________________________________________ 76 Local Patterns and Trends_________________________________________________________ 78 Other Relevant Factors ___________________________________________________________ 80 E. SITES ANALYSIS _________________________________________________________82 Nonvacant Sites and Redevelopment Potential ________________________________________ 95 Nonvacant: Residential ___________________________________________________________________95 Nonvacant: Agricultural/Open Space ________________________________________________________97 Nonvacant: Public Facilities _______________________________________________________________99 Nonvacant: Commercial _________________________________________________________________100 Small Sites Analysis and Consolidation Potential _____________________________________ 101 Sites Inventory Findings__________________________________________________________ 102 Regional Discussion _____________________________________________________________ 105 Local Discussion ________________________________________________________________ 106 Identification of Contributing Factors and Fair Housing Priorities & Goals_______________ 108

Page 1070 of 1565 ends

List of Tables
Table 1: Community Workshops 8
Table 2: Kings County Fair Housing Compliance 12
Table 3: Race and Ethnicity 16
Table 4: Household Income Distribution by Tenure 20
Table 5: Household Characteristics 24
Table 6: Household Type by Tenure 25
Table 7: Percentages of Persons with Disability Types in Unincorporated Kings County 29 Table 8: Persons with Developmental Disabilities Receiving Services by Residential Type 31 Table 9: Kings County Household Population Growth, 1990-2020 34 Table 10: Household Tenure and Vacancy Rates 39
Table 11: Household Population and Civilian Employment Trends 40 Table 12: Travel Time to Work 42
Table 13: Overcrowding by Tenure 47
Table 14: Household Overpayment by Tenure 49
Table 15: Homeless Persons 55
Table 16: Shelter Facilities in Kings County 57
Table 17: Agricultural Employment by Jurisdiction 63
Table 18: Leading Agricultural Crops, Kings County 63
Table 19: Hired Farm Labor-Workers, Kings County 64
Table 20: Land Inventory and RHNA Targets 102
Table 21: Census-Tract-Wise Resource Opportunities 104
Table 22: Distribution of Sites by Census Tract 105
Table 23: Factors Contributing to Fair Housing Issues 108 List of Figures
Figure 1: Kings County 10
Figure 2: Local Racial Demographics 17
Figure 3: Racial/Ethnic Area of Concentration of Poverty (R/ECAP) 18 Figure 4: Removed 19
Figure 5: Local Median Income (ACS, 2017-2021) – TRACT 20 Figure 6: Poverty Status (ACS, 2017-2021) – TRACT 23
Figure 7: Children in Single-Parent Female-Headed Households 28 Figure 8: Population with a Disability 30
Figure 9: COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Areas, 2023 35 Figure 10: Kings County All Transit Performance Score 37 Figure 11: Kings County High Quality Transit Stops & Transit Area (1/2 Mile) 38 Figure 12: Employment by Industry of Kings County Workforce 41 Figure 13: High Quality Transit Stops & Transit Area (1/2 Mile) & Jobs within 45-Minute Transit Commute 43
Figure 14: School Districts in Kings County 45

Page 1071 of 1565 ends

Figure 15: Overcrowding in Kings County 50
Figure 16: Overpayment by Renters (ACS, 2017-2021) – Tract Level 51 Figure 17: Percentage of Homeowners Overpaying 52
Figure 18: Estimated Displacement Risk – Overall Displacement by Tract 59 Figure 19-A: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 & High-Quality Transit Stops (Transit Area ½ Mile) 73 Figure 19-B: Flood Hazard Zones 74
Figure 20: Armona Community & Surrounding Area Vacant Sites 6,000 sf or Greater 83 Figure 21: Armona Community & Surrounding Area Vacant Land Inventory 84 Figure 22: Armona Community Vacant Sites by Income Level 85 Figure 23: Home Garden Community & Surrounding Area Vacant Sites 6,000 sf or Greater 86 Figure 24: Home Garden Community & Surrounding Area Vacant Land Inventory 87 Figure 25: Home Garden Community Vacant Sites by Income Level 88 Figure26: Kettleman City Community Vacant Sites 6,000 sf or Greater 89 Figure 27: Kettleman City Community & Surrounding Area Vacant Land Inventory 90 Figure 28: Kettleman City Community Vacant Sites by Income Level 91 Figure 29: Stratford Community Zoning Vacant Sites 6,000 sf or Greater 92 Figure 30: Stratford Community and Surrounding Area Vacant Land Inventory 93 Figure 31: Stratford Community Vacant Sites by Income Level 94

Page 1072 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
A. LOCAL ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING
Introduction
Assembly Bill (AB) 686 requires that all housing elements due on or after January 1, 2021, contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule of July 16, 2015. Under California law, AFFH means “taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communitiesfree from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics.”1

California Government Code Section 65583 (10)(A)(ii) requires local jurisdictions to analyze racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty and affluence, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. Although this is the Housing Element for the County of Kings, Government Code Section 65583 (c)(10) requires all local jurisdictions to address patterns locally and regionally to compare conditions at the local level to the rest of the region. This section is organized by fair housing topics strategies to address the identified issues. Through discussions with housing service providers, fair housing advocates, and this assessment of fair housing issues, the County of Kings identified factors that contribute to fair housing issues.

The AFFH analysis must contain the following:

1. Outreach

3. Sites Inventory

4. Identification
1 California Department of Housing and Community Development, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: Guidance for All Public Entities and for Housing Elements (April 2021 Update), April 27, 2021, preface page, https://www.hcd.ca.gov/communitydevelopment/affh/docs/affh_document_final_4-27-2021.pdf.

KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 5

Page 1073 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | Outreach Program
State law requires local governments to make a diligent effort to achieve public participation in three formal community meetings to initiate the Housing Element. To that end, each jurisdiction has provided opportunities for residents, interested parties, and local officials to participate in the update process and offer recommendations regarding housing needs and strategies to address those needs.

The diligent effort required means that local jurisdictions must do more than issue the customary public notices and conduct standard public hearings prior to adopting a Housing Element. State law requires cities and counties to take active steps to inform, involve, and solicit input from the public, particularly lowincome and racial and ethnic households that might otherwise not participate in the process. Spanishlanguage materials were available, and Spanish translation was made available by request.

The public participation process for this Housing Element involved five major stages:

1. Public workshops and meetings in each of the four cities and the Kings unincorporated County during the preparation of the Draft Housing Element.

2. Prior to submittal of the first draft to California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), the local government must make the draft available for public comment for 30 days and if any comments were received, take at least 10 business days to consider and incorporate public comments.

3. Publication of the Draft Housing Element and subsequent review by the HCD.

4. Revisions to the Housing Element to address comments from HCD and publication of a revised Draft Housing Element.

5. Public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council of each city and the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors of Kings County prior to adoption of the final Housing Element.

To meet the requirements of state law, the County of Kings completed the public outreach at both the local level and as part of the regional Kings County Multi-Jurisdictional Housing Element effort to encourage community involvement. These efforts included:
• Regional Project Website
• Stakeholder Consultations and Focus Groups
• Study Sessions with the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors • Community Workshops
• Community Survey
Regional efforts included community workshops, consultations, and a community survey, all of which are discussed in detail in the Housing Element Appendix C: Public Participation Summary. The following is a summary of the key results of the survey for Kings County:
• Majority of respondents identified the cost of buying a home (38%) and limited availability of affordable units (27%) as the biggest barriers to affordable housing in Kings County. • Top 3 housing priorities, 1) Increase the amount of housing that is affordable for moderate, low, 6

Page 1074 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | and very low-income residents; 2) Increasing home ownership opportunities for moderate, low and very low-income residents; Identified programs to help existing homeowners stay in their homes as priorities.
• Over two-thirds (67%) of the respondents were satisfied with their housing situation; • Single family homes are the preferred type of housing; • 61% of respondents felt there is insufficient housing for low-income households, 50% of respondents felt there is insufficient housing for single individuals, 45% felt there is insufficient housing for families with children and 35% of respondents felt there is sufficient housing for older adults (seniors, elderly).

Community Workshops
A Kings County 2024-2032 Housing Element and Fair Housing Analysis Public Workshop was held on November 6th, 2023 at 7:00 PM during a Planning Commission meeting. During the workshop presentation county staff and consultants provided a description of the Housing Element adoption process. Consultants and county staff also provided a description of the Fair Housing Analysis process as well as a timeline for adoption. At each workshop, the community was prompted to provide feedback to the prompts listed below:
• Questions from the participants at the workshop
• What are the housing challenges facing the County?
• What opportunities are available to the County to support housing needs? • What should the top five priorities be?
• Fair Housing issues, complaints and recommendations.

The floor was then opened for public comment after consultant and county staff presentation.

At the City of Hanford, a public workshop took place during a joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting on November 6th, 2023 at 4:00 PM. During the workshop presentation city staff and consultants provided a description of the Housing Element adoption process. Consultants and city staff also provided a description of the Fair Housing Analysis process as well as a timeline for adoption.

At the City of Lemoore, a public workshop took place during a City Council meeting on November 7th, 2023 at 5:30 PM. During the workshop presentation city staff and consultants provided a description of the Housing Element adoption process and timelines for adoption. Consultants and city staff also provided information on 6th cycle RHNA allocations as well as a timeline for HCD certification.

At the City of Avenal, a public workshop took place during a Town Hall meeting on November 8th, 2023 at 6:00 PM. During the workshop presentation city staff and consultants provided a description of the Housing Element adoption process and timelines for adoption. Consultants and city staff also provided information on RHNA allocations as well as a timeline for adoption. 7

Page 1075 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | At the City of Corcoran, a public workshop took place during a Planning Commission meeting on November 20th, 2023 at 5:30 PM. During the workshop presentation city staff and consultants provided a description of the Housing Element adoption process and timelines for adoption.

Consultants and city staff also provided information on 6th cycle RHNA allocations as well as a timeline for HCD certification.

List of Community Workshops are presented in Table 1:

Table 1: Community Workshops
Jurisdiction Date Format
City of Hanford November 6th, 2023 at 4:00 PM Joint City Council/Planning Commission Meeting
Kings County November 6th, 2023 at 7:00 PM Planning Commission Meeting City of Lemoore November 7th, 2023 at 5:30 PM Planning Commission Meeting City of Avenal November 8th, 2023 at 6:00 PM Town Hall Meeting City of Corcoran November 20th, 2023 at 5:30 PM Planning Commission Meeting 8

Page 1076 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 9 B. ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING ISSUES
This section provides an overview of available federal, state, and local data to analyze fair housing issues in the County of Kings. This data is supplemented with local knowledge of existing conditions in the community to present a more accurate depiction of fair housing issues in the County, and a more informed perspective from which to base goals, policies, and programs to affirmatively further fair housing. The following issues are addressed:

1. Key Data and Background Information

2. Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity

3. Integration and Segregation Patterns and Trends

4. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty

5. Disparities in Access to Opportunity

6. Disproportionate Housing Needs

7. Displacement Risk
Key Data and Background Information
Kings County is located within the agriculturally rich San Joaquin Valley, with Fresno County to the north and west, Tulare County to the east, and Kern County to the south. Created in 1893, Kings County was carved from the western portion of Tulare County and later added another 100 square miles. The Kings River, from which the County derives its name, runs along the northern edges and flows south towards the center of the County. Historically, this river flowed farther south to what was once Tulare Lake. Kings County is comprised of four cities (Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford, and Lemoore), four unincorporated community service areas (Armona, Home Garden, Kettleman City, and Stratford), and a few other smaller community pockets. According to the California Department of Finance (DOF), approximately 154,000 people lived in Kings County as of January 2024, with approximately 13,500 of those housed within the three state prison facilities. The County’s transportation network has played a key role in its economic development. Agriculture remains the predominant landscape of Kings County, with approximately 84% of its land area used for agriculture. Figure 1 is a map of Kings County with the location of the four cities and four unincorporated communities.

The availability of decent and affordable housing for residents is an important housing goal. To accomplish this goal, a comprehensive assessment of housing needs provides the basis for developing responsive policies and programs. This FHA also presents and analyzes demographic, economic, and housing characteristics and their impact upon housing needs in the unincorporated areas of Kings County, with focus on the four communities of Armona, Home Garden, Kettleman City and Stratford.

Page 1077 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 10 Figure 1: Kings County

Page 1078 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 11 Local Patterns of Integration and Segregation
An expanded analysis of local patterns within each major unincorporated community in Kings County has been conducted in this FHA. To summarize the key local patterns, the unincorporated community of Armona, Hispanic/Latino residents make up more than 70% of the population, with moderate access to educational opportunities but limited access to higher-paying employment opportunities. In Home Garden, approximately 85% of residents identify as Hispanic/Latino, and the community exhibits a moderate to high-cost burden among renters (57%) and the highest overcrowding rate (35%) among the unincorporated communities. The community of Kettleman City demonstrates significant income segregation, with approximately 65% of households classified as low-income, and residents experience limited access to high-performing schools and reliable transportation options. Stratford, meanwhile, has a higher proportion of persons with disabilities (18%) and female-headed households (22%), coupled with lower access to educational and economic opportunities compared to other communities.

These observed patterns are aligned with historical land use practices, such as agricultural zoning and uneven infrastructure investments, have contributed to segregation and limited upward mobility, particularly in the western and southern portions of unincorporated Kings County. This expanded assessment informs the County’s updated fair housing goals and programmatic strategies to promote greater equity and access across all neighborhoods.

Enforcement and Outreach Capacity
The County of Kings has procedures in place to support fair housing enforcement and outreach efforts.

Enforcement Capacity Kings County partners with the Fair Housing Council of Central California (FHCCC) to conduct investigations of alleged housing discrimination complaints. FHCCC provides intake services, counseling, investigation, and referral of complaints to appropriate enforcement agencies such as HUD or the California Civil Rights Department (formerly DFEH).

County staff within the Community Development Agency also coordinate with legal services organizations to refer residents with fair housing concerns. Although the County does not directly conduct fair housing testing, FHCCC conducts such testing periodically within the Central Valley region, and results are reviewed to identify emerging patterns of discrimination.

Outreach Capacity Kings County conducts outreach activities as part of its public participation process, including dissemination of fair housing materials in English and Spanish, hosting community workshops, and maintaining information on the County’s website regarding rights and responsibilities under fair housing laws.

Additional outreach is performed through partnerships with community-based organizations, housing advocates, and service providers. The Housing Element’s public outreach program is presented in Appendix C: Public Participation Summary.

Complaint Data and Patterns Based on data from FHCCC and HUD's Enforcement Management System (HEMS), the volume of fair housing complaints from Kings County remains low. As presented in Table 1 below, most complaints are related to disability discrimination (45%) and familial status discrimination (30%).

Complaints are distributed across jurisdictions without significant concentration in any specific geographic area.

Page 1079 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 12 Table 2: Kings County Fair Housing Compliance
Law Description Compliance
California Fair
Employment
and Housing Act
(FEHA)
The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) applies
to public and private employers, labor organizations and employment agencies and prohibits discrimination in
housing and employment on the basis of protected
characteristics.

The FEHA prohibits those engaged in the housing
business – landlords, real estate agents, home sellers, builders, mortgage lenders, among others – from
discriminating against tenants or homeowners based on
protected characteristics.

It is also illegal for cities, counties, or other local government agencies to make zoning or land-use
decisions, or have policies, that discriminate against
individuals based on those traits.

The County complies with
employment requirements through
strict enforcement of hiring practices
and regular training of hiring managers
and human resources staff.

All development projects with County
funding are required to comply with
FEHA.

Government
CodeSection
65008
Covers actions of a city, county, city and county, or
other local government agency, and makes those
actions null and void if the action denies an individual or group of individuals the enjoyment of residence,
landownership, tenancy, or other land use in the state
because of membership in a protected class, the method of financing, and/or the intended occupancy.

For example, a violation under Government Code section
65008 mayoccur if a jurisdiction applied more scrutiny
to reviewing and approving an affordable development as compared to market-rate developments, or multifamily
housing as compared to single family homes.

Compliance is achieved by uniform
application of the County’s codes,
regulations, policies and practices,
including development standards,
design guidelines, application submittal
requirements, fees and approval
findings.

Kings County supports the
recommendations of the San Joaquin
Valley Fair Housing and Equity
Assessment and cooperates with the
State in the development of the
Assessment of Fair Housing.

Government
CodeSection
8899.50
Requires all public agencies to administer programs and activities relating to housing and community
development in a manner to affirmatively further fair
housing and avoid any action that is materially
inconsistent with its obligation to affirmatively further fair housing.

Compliance is achieved through
consultations with community
stakeholders and support agencies as
partof program evaluation and funding
decisions.

Government
CodeSection
11135 et seq.

Requires full and equal access to all programs and
activities operated, administered, or funded with financial assistance from the state, regardless of one’s membership or perceived membership in a protected class.

Compliance is achieved through
promotion/availabilityof activities and
programs to all persons of all
backgrounds to participate equally in
community programs and activities.

Housing
Accountability
Act(Gov. Code,
§ 65589.5.)
Provides that a local agency shall not disapprove a
housing development project, for very low, low-, or
moderate-income households, or an emergency shelter,
or condition approval in a manner that renders the
housing development project infeasible for development
for the use of very low, low-, or moderate-income
households, or an emergency shelter, including through
the use of design review standards, unless it makes certain Compliance is achieved through the
development review process
consistent with the Housing
Accountability Act. Additionally, the
County continually reviews its
development standards and to ensure they
facilitate an objective and equitable
review of applicable projects.

Page 1080 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 13 Law Description Compliance
written findings, based upon a preponderance of the
evidence in the record.

Excessive
Subdivision
Standards (Gov.

Code, §
65913.2.)
Provides that, in exercising its authority to regulate
subdivisions a city, county, or city and county shall:

Refrain from imposing criteria for design, as defined in Section 66418, or improvements, as defined in Section
66419, for the purpose of rendering infeasible the
development of housing for any and all economic
segments of the community. However, nothing in this
section shall be construed to enlarge or diminish the
authority of a city, county, or city and county under
other provisions of law to permit a developer to
construct such housing.

Consider the effect of ordinances adopted and actions
taken by itwith respect to the housing needs of the
region in which the local jurisdiction is situated.

Refrain from imposing standards and criteria for public improvements including, but not limited to, streets,
sewers, fire stations, schools, or parks, which exceed the standards and criteria being applied by the city, county, or city and county at that time to itspublicly financed improvements located in similarly zoned districts
within that city, county, or city and county.

Compliance is achieved through the
implementation of a fair and equitable
development review process whichis
administrated consistent with the
Excessive Subdivision Standards Act.

Housing
Element Law
(Gov. Code, §
65583, esp.
subds.(c)(5),
(c)(10).)
Section 65583 stipulates that the housing element shall consist of an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals,
policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement,
and development of housing. The housing element shall
identify adequate sites for housing, including rental
housing, factory-built housing, mobile homes, and
emergency shelters, and shall make adequate provision
for the existing and projected needs of all economic
segments of the community.

Subdivision (c)(5) provides that, in order to make
adequate provisionfor the housing needs of all economic segments of the community, the program shall promote
and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or
communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color,
familial status, or disability, and other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and
Housing Act (Part 2.8 (commencing with Section
12900) of Division 3 of Title 2), Section 65008, and any other state and federal fair housing and planning law.

Compliance is achieved through
preparation and adoption of a Housing
Element found to be in substantial
compliance with State Housing Element
lawby the California Department of
Housing and Community
Development.

Page 1081 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 14 Compliance with Fair Housing Laws Kings County affirms full compliance with existing federal and state fair housing laws, including the federal Fair Housing Act and California's Fair Employment and Housing Act. The County has not been subject to any fair housing lawsuits, findings, settlements, or judgments within the past five years. Going forward, the County will strengthen fair housing enforcement and outreach by:
• Expanding partnerships with regional fair housing providers, • Increasing education campaigns targeted to historically underserved populations, • Reviewing complaint trends annually to inform fair housing strategies, • Evaluating the feasibility of participating directly in periodic fair housing testing programs.

Racial and Ethnic Characteristics
In unincorporated areas of Kings County, a rich tapestry of cultural and ethnic diversity is evident. As presented in Table 3, nearly half of the population, 49.3%, identifies as not Hispanic or Latino, with the largest subgroup being White, comprising 36.3%. This is followed by a notable Black or African American presence, accounting for 5.1%, and smaller, yet significant, communities of American Indian/Alaska Native and Asian, each representing 2.4%. The Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander group, although smaller at 0.2%, along with those identifying with other races or multiple races (3.0%), add to the mosaic of ethnicities. In contrast, the Hispanic or Latino population, encompassing individuals of various racial backgrounds, forms a slight majority at 50.7%.

This demographic shift highlights the area's vibrant Hispanic or Latino heritage, which plays a pivotal role in shaping the cultural landscape of the region.

As shown in Figure 2, there are variations in the local racial demographics and the segregations. In the unincorporated Kings County, there does not appear to be the existence of High-White segregation. While their areas surrounding Lemoore are racially integrated, most of the areas in the northern and eastern regions have Low-medium segregation. While central and southern areas have High People of Color (POC) Segregation.

While this corresponds with the HCD opportunity map as the areas with moderate resources.

Racial/Ethnic Areas of Concentration of Poverty (R/ECAP) and Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA)
The race and ethnic composition of a population influence fair housing issues to the extent that certain racial and ethnic groups may experience discrimination. These influences are due to factors such as color, language spoken, or other cultural factors, which can affect resident’s ability to find housing, obtain home financing, or have unrestricted access to housing of their choice. According to the Census ACS 2016-2020 data, the Hispanic or Latino population, encompassing individuals of various racial backgrounds, forms a slight majority at 51% of the total unincorporated County population. As previously mentioned, 85% of the residents of Home Garden and 70% of Armona communities identify as Hispanic/Latino.

To meet the threshold of a Racial/Ethnic Area of Concentration of Poverty (R/ECAP), a census tract must have a non-white population of 50% or more, with 40 percent or more of individuals living at or below the poverty line. According to the HUD database used to create the map in Figure 3, two census tracts within Kings County meet the defined parameters for a R/ECAP designation. They include the unincorporated area southwest of the City of Avenal and the community of Home Garden located southeast of the City of Hanford.

Southwest of Avenal
Census tract 17.03 is a large census tract in the unincorporated area southwest of the City of Avenal in a rural

Page 1082 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 15 area with a low population. This area also includes the Kettleman Hills and coast range mountains where residences are widely dispersed. There are no communities here, and all the lands are zoned for agricultural use, with the small exception of the Jackson Ranch Specific Plan area which also includes some limited commercial zoning along Interstate-5.

Home Garden
Housing Conditions. The community of Home Garden’s residential development is generally achieved through limited infill development and by increasing density, often through the installment of Accessory Dwelling Units.

There is a mix of aging homes and types of homes (i.e., stick built or mobile home), which is similar to the Kettleman City and Stratford Communities. Like all other communities in the unincorporated area, there is no specific area of substandard housing. These housing conditions are also similar to the closest residential areas of the City of Hanford, which is located to the north and west.

Neighborhood Conditions. Residential areas within the existing Home Garden Community are mostly laid out in a grid street pattern. There have been limited curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements along some of the arterial residential streets. Installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk is dependent on available grant funding or are required improvements when a zoning permit is approved. Limited commercial development exists along the western side along 10th Avenue. Home Garden has the newest Community park, which is cared for by the Home Garden Community Service District. Neighborhood conditions are similar to Stratford and Kettleman City. Unlike the other three Communities, Home Garden does not have access to a library or a school within the Community. However, Home Garden is in much closer proximity to a city that has amenities and resources than Kettleman City and Stratford.

New Development. The newest development has been focused on residential infill throughout the Community and the limited commercial development along 10th Avenue. Many of the existing single-family homes were constructed in the 1940s and 1950s, while some of the newer homes built on the west side of 10th Avenue were constructed in the 1960s and 1970s. This is common for the Kings County unincorporated areas, with the newest residential developments occurring in the Armona Community or within the Cities. Interest for commercial development along 10th Avenue has recently increased, with the expansion of a small strip mall that currently holds a convenience store and fast-food restaurant. Home Garden has less commercial development compared to Armona but is similar to Stratford Community and the Kettleman City Community’s northern residential area.

Physical Features. Home Garden is not situated directly along a highway or railway like the other Communities, but 10th Avenue is an arterial street and runs north-south along the western side. Home Garden is bounded by the City of Hanford’s sphere of influence to the north, west, and south (west of 10th Avenue), and agriculturally zoned lands to the east and south, preventing growth beyond its current boundaries. The Community is southwest of Hanford Airport and mostly lies within one of the Aviation Land Use Overlay Zones.

Overall Conditions. The Home Garden Community is highly similar to the Stratford and Kettleman City Communities with regard to housing and neighborhood conditions and new development. The Community shares many similarities to the Armona Community with access to amenities and resources. While Home Garden’s physical features are different from all three of the other Communities since it is not located along a Highway and/or railway, it is approximately 1.5 miles south of Highway 198, which runs east-west through Kings County. Home Garden borders the City of Hanford, which is the largest city in Kings County.

Page 1083 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 16 Table 3: Race and Ethnicity
Racial /Ethnic Group
Unincorporated
Kings County Kings County
Not Hispanic
or Latino 49.30% 45.10%
White 36.30% 31.60%
Black or
African American 5.10% 5.90%
American Indian/
Alaska Native 2.40% 0.80%
Asian 2.40% 3.60%
Native Hawaiian
/Pacific Islander 0.20% 0.10%
Other races or
2+ races 3.00% 3.20%
Hispanic or Latino
(any race) 50.70% 54.90%
Total 100% 100%
Source: Census ACS 2016-2020, Table B03002
While the R/ECAP addresses racial poverty and segregation, the FHA also examines the other side of the spectrum, which is the Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA). According to a HUD policy paper, RCAA is defined as an affluent, White community. Patterns of segregation in the United States show that of all racial groups, Whites are the most severely segregated2 . Therefore, this FHA examines the percentage of White
population and median household income as an indicator of areas of affluence.

The HCD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data Viewer reports that there are no RCAAs located in Kings County. Disparities are most pronounced in communities like Home Garden, Kettleman City, and Stratford, which face limited services, higher overcrowding, and cost burden. Kettleman City and Stratford are located in the south part of the county where there is less access to grocery stores, health care facilities, and non-agricultural jobs than the north County. While the County has two regional parks in the northern half, Kettleman City only has access to a local community park. Stratford does not have a community park. All Communities have access to a Kings County Branch Library within each Community. Stratford, Kettleman City, and Home Garden do not have full curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and therefore it is required to be installed as part of a development application.

The County will implement programs to assist with affordable housing development (Program 4.13), promote Single Room Occupancy (SRO) housing (Program 4.16), support infrastructure improvements (Program 4.18), ensure the General Plan and Development Code comply with state laws (Program 4.20), conduct ADU outreach (Program 4.22), support the development of extremely-low income housing (Program 4.23), regionally collaborate with the Cities on housing opportunities (Program 4.24) and attainment of infrastructure (Program 4.25).
2 “Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence: A Preliminary Investigation” authored by Edward G. Goetz, Anthony Damiano, and Rashad A. Williams of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota.

Page 1084 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 17 Figure 2: Local Racial Demographics
\
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD); OBI, 2020

Page 1085 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 18 Figure 3: Racial/Ethnic Area of Concentration of Poverty (R/ECAP) Source: https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com

Page 1086 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 19 Income Distribution
Along with housing prices and rents, household income is the most important factor affecting housing opportunities within Kings County. Housing choices such as tenure (owning versus renting), housing type, and location are dependent on household income. On the other hand, however, household size and type often affect the proportion of income that can be spent on housing.

Median Household Income In general, median household income by census tract reflects those patterns in adjacent tracts within incorporated cities as illustrated in Figure 5. In many cases, tracts with particularly high or low median incomes that include incorporated areas also extend into the unincorporated county, making it difficult to determine whether median household income for the tract reflects incomes for residents within or outside of the incorporated areas, although residential areas within incorporated jurisdictions are typically denser, indicating that data on these tracts may more accurately reflect conditions for residents of the incorporated jurisdiction.

Most of the unincorporated county has median incomes between $30,000 and $87,500 (state median income).

The unincorporated communities of Kettleman City and Stratford are in the median income range of $35,000 to $60,000, while the communities of Armona and Home Garden are in the range of $60,000 to $84,100. Although median household income is a common benchmark for comparison, the distribution of household income also provides a useful measure of housing needs in a community. In housing analysis, households are typically grouped into categories, expressed relative to the Area Median Income (AMI) and adjusted for family size.

Using State of California income thresholds, the income groups analyzed were as follows:

Extremely low income: Up to 30% of AMI
Very low income: 31-50% of AMI
Low income: 51-80% of AMI
Moderate income: 81-120% of AMI
Upper income: Above 120% of AMI
Figure 4: Removed

Page 1087 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 20 Figure 5: Local Median Income (ACS, 2017-2021) – TRACT
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development. ACS 5yr estimates (2017-2021).

Updated: March 2023.

Table 4 estimates the percentage of households by tenure within each income category in each jurisdiction as reported in HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data based on the Census ACS 2014-2018. Countywide, almost one-quarter (24%) of owner households were in the lower-income category (80% or less than the AMI --extremely-low, very-low, and low incomes), while over one-half (55%) of renter households were in the lower-income category. In the incorporated county more than 60% of owners belonged to the moderate-income category while the renters were mostly distributed in the moderate income and lower income categories. As witnessed at the county and city levels, renters experience a higher proportion of lower-income households.

Table 4: Household Income Distribution by Tenure
Income Category Unincorporated Kings County
Owners
<= 30% 6.50% 5.50%
>30% to <=50% 9.10% 7.30%

Page 1088 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 21 >50% to <=80% 10.70% 11.00%
>80% to <=100% 7.80% 8.60%
>100% 65.70% 67.50%
Total 100.00% 100.00%
Renters
<= 30% 14.10% 17.70%
>30% to <=50% 13.30% 14.60%
>50% to <=80% 26.50% 22.80%
>80% to <=100% 10.50% 11.40%
>100% 35.40% 33.50%
Total 100.00% 100.00%
Source: HUD CHAS data based on Census ACS 2014-2018
Data from the U.S. Census Bureau indicates that from 2010 to 2020, median monthly housing costs in the unincorporated areas of Kings County rose from $960 to $1,094, a 14.0% increase, which is less than the

19.8% increase seen statewide in California. The median household income in unincorporated Kings County was $61,556, lower than the state median of $78,672. Additionally, 11.2% of households in these areas lived below the poverty level, which is slightly better than Kings County’s overall rate of 13.1%, yet still above California’s 9.0% rate.

Poverty In 2021, Kings County experienced varying levels of poverty across different regions. Census tracts as seen in Figure 6 in many areas revealed poverty rates reaching up to 30% of the population living below the poverty level, particularly pronounced in certain regions. The northern areas around Hanford generally displayed poverty rates below 10%, indicating a lower prevalence of poverty compared to other areas. In contrast, areas near Corcoran exhibited the highest poverty tract, with rates ranging between 20 and 30%. Meanwhile, the southern regions near Avenal experienced poverty rates in the range of 10 to 20%. Of the four unincorporated communities, Armona had the lowest percentage range of the population in poverty (10%-20%), which was followed by Kettleman City and Stratford at 20%-30%. Home Garden had the highest percentage of the population living below the poverty level at 30%-40%. The overall poverty rate for Kings County stood at 16.4%, marking a 2.19% increase from the previous year. The median household income in 2021 was reported at $63,267, showing a growth of 2.78% from the previous year.

The total number of individuals living in poverty in Kings County in 2021 was 24,295, reflecting a fluctuating trend in poverty levels over the preceding years, with the numbers being 19,874 in 2020, 21,840 in 2019, and even higher at 25,481 in 2018 and 24,810 in 2017. According to American Community Survey data from 2017 to 2021, 17.7% of persons in Kings County were in poverty. These statistics underscore the diverse economic landscape of Kings County, where certain areas exhibit significantly higher poverty rates, highlighting the need for targeted socioeconomic interventions.

Extremely Low Income Households In 2006 state law was amended (Assembly Bill 2634) to add the extremely low-income (ELI) category (up to 30% AMI) to the required analysis of household characteristics and housing growth needs. Consistent with State Housing Element law and HCD guidance, the County has assumed that 50 percent of the very low-income category allocation (132 units) will represent projected need for extremely low-income (ELI) households, resulting in an estimated need for 66

Page 1089 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 22 ELI units. This quantification reflects the disproportionately higher housing cost burdens, overcrowding rates, and risk of homelessness among lower-income and extremely low-income households within the unincorporated County, as documented through HUD CHAS data and local surveys.

In response, Kings County will prioritize strategies to address the needs of ELI households by:
• Supporting the development of new affordable housing units specifically targeted to ELI households;
• Expanding rental assistance programs and housing voucher opportunities; • Preserving and rehabilitating existing affordable housing stock; • Encouraging the development of smaller, lower-cost housing units suitable for ELI residents; • Integrating housing programs with supportive services for populations with heightened needs, such as persons with disabilities and seniors.

This targeted approach is designed to directly address the unique and severe housing needs of ELI households, consistent with best practices outlined in the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s Building Blocks for Effective Housing Elements.

The expanded analysis also considers past housing production trends, demographic shifts, and labor market dynamics to ensure that future housing production strategies are responsive to the needs of all segments of the community, particularly those most vulnerable to housing instability.

Page 1090 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 23 Figure 6: Poverty Status (ACS, 2017-2021) – TRACT
*
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development. American Community Survey (ACS), 2017-2021.

Page 1091 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 24 Special Housing Needs
Familial Status A household refers to the people occupying a home, such as a family, a single person, or unrelated persons living together. Families often prefer single-family homes or condominiums to accommodate children, while single people generally occupy smaller apartments or condominiums.

Single-person households often include seniors or young adults. Table 5 displays household composition by community as reported by the Census ACS 2015-2020. Families comprised approximately 78% of all households within Kings County. Countywide, the proportion of single households (male and females living alone) was approximately 17%.

Table 5: Household Characteristics
Age Group
Unincorporated Kings
County Kings County
Total Households 9,244 43,604
Family Households 81.90% 78.30%
With own children under 18 years 43.50% 41.30%
Married/Cohabiting Couples 68.20% 61.20%
With own children under 18 years 37.30% 32.20%
Male Householder, no spouse/partner present 13.60% 16.20% With own children under 18 years 1.80% 2.40%
Living Alone 6.50% 8.30%
Age 65+ 1.80% 2.50%
Female Householder, no spouse/partner present 18.20% 22.60% With own children under 18 years 4.40% 6.80%
Living Alone 8.10% 8.80%
Age 65+ 4.70% 4.70%
Nonfamily Households 18.10% 21.70%
Average Household Size NA 3.14
Source: Census ACS 2016-2020, Tables DP-2, B11012, and S1101 In both areas, a significant portion of households have children under 18 years. In the unincorporated Kings County, this is slightly higher (43.50%) than in Kings County as a whole (41%). Many households in unincorporated areas are headed by married or cohabiting couples (68%), which is higher than in the broader county (61%). Among these, a substantial proportion (37%) have children under 18, indicating a prevalence of traditional nuclear families. Male householder households without a spouse or partner present in unincorporated area is around 13.6 % compared to the overall county (16%). Within this group, a smaller fraction, 1.80% in unincorporated Kings County and 2.40% in Kings County, have children under 18, indicating a presence of single-father households. The data also sheds light on female-headed households without a spouse or partner, which make up a significant 18% in unincorporated Kings County and an even higher 22.6% in Kings County. Among these, 4.40% in the unincorporated area and 6.80% in the broader county have children under 18, underscoring the challenges faced by single mothers. Additionally, the proportion of individuals living alone is significant, with 6.50% in unincorporated Kings County and 8.30% in Kings County. This includes a notable percentage of the elderly (aged 65 and above), accounting for

1.80% and 2.50% respectively.

Page 1092 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 25 Female-headed households Female-headed households without a spouse or partner are also less common in unincorporated areas. These households often face challenges, particularly in terms of resource access and opportunities, especially for children in single-parent, female-headed households. In Figure 6, it's seen that northern parts of the county that contain cities of Hanford and Lemoore have less than 20% of households with children that are headed by a female single parent. While it's 20-40% in the rest of the county. The distribution of single-parent, female-headed households correlate with TCAC/HCD opportunity areas designations, indicating that areas with lower resources and higher segregation and poverty have higher rates of such households.

Female-headed households have special housing needs including affordable housing, accessible daycare, health care, and other supportive services. Female-headed households comprised about 17% of all households in Kings County. State law recognizes that these households face challenges due to a combination of income level, childcare expenses, and housing availability. As shown in Table 6, the proportion of female-headed households was about 12% in the unincorporated areas and 17% countywide.

Notably, across all jurisdictions, the data reveals that a higher percentage of female-headed households are renters rather than homeowners. This trend is indicative of the economic challenges and housing affordability issues faced by these households. Additionally, the table illustrates that in unincorporated Kings County, out of the total 9,244 households, a significant majority, about 82%, are family households.

This breakdown of household types and tenures, including the specific focus on female-headed households, provides a comprehensive overview of the diverse household compositions and housing situations in these regions, highlighting the need for tailored policy interventions and support services.

Table 6: Household Type by Tenure
Household Type
Unincorporated Kings County Kings County
HH % HH %
Total Households 9,244 43,604
Family households: 7,575 81.90% 34,155 78.30%
Owner 3,428 37.10% 18,997 43.60%
Renter 4,147 44.90% 15,158 34.80%
Married-couple family: 5,801 62.80% 23,236 53.30%
Owner 2,698 29.20% 14,704 33.70%
Renter 3,103 33.60% 8,532 19.60%
Male householder no wife present: 693 7.50% 3,653 8.40% Owner 306 3.30% 1,499 3.40%
Renter 387 4.20% 2,154 4.90%
Female householder no husband present: 1,081 11.70% 7,266 16.70% Owner 424 4.60% 2,794 6.40%
Renter 657 7.10% 4,472 10.30%
Nonfamily households: 1,669 18.10% 9,449 21.70%
Owner 870 9.40% 4,371 10.00%
Renter 799 8.60% 5,078 11.60%
Source: Census ACS 2016-2020, Table B25007
As Figure 7 shows, the census tract with the unincorporated community of Armona had less than 20% of the children in single-parent female-headed households. The census tracts of the communities of Home

Page 1093 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 26 Garden, Kettleman City, and Stratford were in the 20%-30% range. County staff indicates that child-care facilities are located throughout the County and their services are available to residents of the four communities.

Elderly: The elderly population in Kings County's unincorporated areas faces significant housing needs.

Approximately 41% of seniors (age 65 and older) report living with one or more disabilities, primarily ambulatory difficulties. Older housing stock, particularly in communities such as Home Garden and Armona, presents accessibility and safety challenges for seniors. Strategies to support independent living include the expansion of senior-friendly housing rehabilitation programs, affordable senior housing developments, and services such as in-home supportive care.

Large Families: Large families face particular difficulty securing adequate housing, due to the limited availability of units with three or more bedrooms. Overcrowding exceeds 30% in Home Garden and Kettleman City, with renter households most affected. Housing solutions must include construction of larger rental units, mixed-income developments, and programs that prioritize family-sized affordable units to meet the needs of larger households.

Persons with Disabilities. Due to the multitude of possible functional limitations that may present as disabilities, and in the absence of information on external factors that influence disability, surveys like the Census Bureau’s ACS are limited to capturing difficulty with only selected activities. As such, people identified by the ACS as having a disability are, in fact, those who exhibit difficulty with specific functions and may, in the absence of accommodation, have a disability. To capture a variety of characteristics that encompass the definition of disability, the ACS identifies serious difficulty with four basic areas of functioning – hearing, vision, cognition, and ambulation.3 As presented in Table 7, the largest number of Kings County residents with disabilities was in the 18 to 64 years age group or the working age population with 8,357 individuals, which represented 11% of the total age group. However, disabilities were most common among senior citizens (65 years and over).

Approximately 41% of total seniors reported one or more types of disability. At the local level, the proportion of seniors reporting some type of physical disability ranged from 37% in unincorporated areas to as high as 63% in the City of Avenal. The most common type of disability among seniors was having ambulatory difficulty. Developmental Disabilities as defined by federal law; “developmental disability” means a severe, chronic disability of an individual that:
• Is attributable to a mental or physical impairment or combination of mental and physical impairments.
• Is manifested before the individual attains age 18.
• Is likely to continue indefinitely.
• Results in substantial functional limitations in three or more of the following areas of major life activity: a) self-care; b) receptive and expressive language; c) learning; d) mobility; e) selfdirection; f) capacity for independent living; or g) economic self-sufficiency. • Reflects the individual’s need for a combination and sequence of special, interdisciplinary, or generic services, individualized supports or other forms of assistance that are of lifelong or 3 Source: American Community Survey 2013 Subject Definitions. Beginning in 2008, questions on disability represent a conceptual and empirical break from earlier years of the ACS. Hence, the Census Bureau does not recommend any comparisons of disability data to 2007 and earlier ACS disability data, or to disability estimates from the 2000 Census.)

Page 1094 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 27 extended duration and are individually planned and coordinated.

The Census Bureau does not record developmental disabilities. According to the U.S. Administration on Developmental Disabilities, an accepted estimate of the percentage of the population that can be defined as developmentally disabled is 1.5 percent. Many developmentally disabled persons can live and work independently within a conventional housing environment. More severely disabled individuals require a group living environment where supervision is provided. The most severely affected individuals may require an institutional environment where medical attention and physical therapy are provided. Because developmental disabilities exist before adulthood, the first issue in supportive housing for the developmentally disabled is the transition from the person’s living situation as a child to an appropriate level of independence as an adult.

Page 1095 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 28 Figure 7: Children in Single-Parent Female-Headed Households Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD), ACS, 2017-2021. Updated: March 2023.

Page 1096 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 29 Table 7: Percentages of Persons with Disability Types in Unincorporated & Kings County Disability Type by Age
Unincorporated Kings County
Persons % Persons %
Population under 18 years w/disability 223 2.30% 1,498 3.70% With a hearing difficulty 58 0.60% 193 0.50%
With a vision difficulty 30 0.30% 480 1.20%
With a cognitive difficulty 163 1.70% 890 2.20%
With an ambulatory difficulty 12 0.10% 127 0.30%
With a self-care difficulty 28 0.30% 219 0.50%
Population 18 to 64 years w/disability 1,927 11.40% 8,357 10.70% With a hearing difficulty 528 3.10% 1,632 2.10%
With a vision difficulty 310 1.80% 1,354 1.70%
With a cognitive difficulty 504 3.00% 3,009 3.80%
With an ambulatory difficulty 993 5.90% 4,087 5.20%
With a self-care difficulty 310 1.80% 1,424 1.80%
With an independent living difficulty 628 3.70% 3,094 4.00% Population 65 years and over w/disability 1,126 36.50% 6,179 40.80% With a hearing difficulty 596 19.30% 2,657 17.60%
With a vision difficulty 190 6.20% 1,265 8.40%
With a cognitive difficulty 300 9.70% 1,458 9.60%
With an ambulatory difficulty 605 19.60% 3,807 25.10%
With a self-care difficulty 185 6.00% 1,500 9.90%
With an independent living difficulty 411 13.30% 2,659 17.60% Note: Numbers represent people, not disabilities. Persons may report more than one type of disability Source:

Census ACS 2016-2020, Table S1810 and C18108
Figure 8 shows the percentage of the population with a disability at the census tract level. It shows that less than 10% of the census tract population that include the communities of Armona, Kettleman City, and Stratford were persons with a disability; whereas, 10%-20% of the census tract population of Home Garden were persons with a disability.

Page 1097 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 30 Figure 8: Population with a Disability

Page 1098 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 31 The State Department of Developmental Services (DDS) currently provides community-based services to approximately 243,000 persons with developmental disabilities and their families through a statewide system of 21 regional centers, four developmental centers, and two community-based facilities. Kings County is served by the Central Valley Regional Center (CVRC) which is based in Fresno. During 2014, CVRC served approximately 16,200 clients, of which about 900 to 1,000 lived in Kings County). CVRC provides diagnosis, evaluation, and case management services. The Center also operates approximately 20 small group homes for mentally disabled clients and placement services to help clients find affordable, independent housing (typically Section 8 units). The Kings County Rehabilitation Center in Hanford also offers rehabilitation, vocational and life training, and operates four group homes for mentally and physically handicapped individuals.

As Table 8 below shows, the community of Armona has the largest number of persons with developmental disabilities (more than 52 persons) reserving residential services in 2021. Most of the service recipients living at home with a family member or guardian. The second highest of the four communities was Kettleman City with more than 14 persons with developmental disabilities receiving services with most living with a family member or guardian. The exact numbers for the communities of Home Garden and Stratford could not be determined.

State and federal law mandate minimum accessibility standards for housing. For example, local governments that use federal housing funds must meet federal accessibility guidelines for new construction and substantial rehabilitation. At least 5% of the units must be accessible to persons with mobility impairments, and an additional 2% must be accessible to persons with sensory impairments. New multifamily housing must be built so that: 1) the public and common use portions of such units are readily accessible to and usable by disabled persons. 2) the doors allowing passage into and within such units can accommodate wheelchairs; and 3) all units contain adaptive design features. In addition, state law requires all jurisdictions to provide reasonable accommodation in the application of housing policies and regulations. According to the County, zoning permits require curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements in all the unincorporated areas of the county. These improvements are especially need for the residents of Kettleman City.

Table 8: Persons with Developmental Disabilities Receiving Services by Residential Type 2021
Community
(Zip Code)
Home of Parent
/Family
/Guardian
Independent /
Supported
Living
Community
Care
Facility
Intermediate
Care
Facility
Foster
/Family
Home Other
Total
Res
Armona (Uninc.)
(93202)
52 <11 0 0 <11 0 >52
Kettleman City
(Uninc.)
(93239)
14 <11 0 0 0 0 >14
Stratford (Uninc.)
(93266)
<11 <11 0 0 0 0 >0
Source: CA Dept. of Developmental Services, 2021

Page 1099 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 32 The special housing needs analysis shows the magnitude of housing needs, available resources, existing gaps, the effectiveness of past strategies, and proposed programs and funding strategies. Approximately

14.1 percent of renter households are classified as Extremely Low-Income (ELI), while 41 percent of seniors report living with one or more disabilities. Overcrowding rates exceed 30 percent in communities such as Home Garden and Kettleman City, and high housing cost burdens are prevalent among femaleheaded households and farmworker families. In addition, emerging risks of homelessness and housing instability are particularly evident in Armona and Home Garden.

The County currently offers several resources, including affordable housing developments targeted to lower-income households, limited emergency shelter beds in urban centers, owner-occupied housing rehabilitation programs, and regional partnerships with fair housing organizations. However, significant gaps remain, including a shortage of affordable units for ELI households and large families, insufficient accessible housing for persons with disabilities, limited emergency shelter capacity in rural areas, and an aging housing stock in need of major rehabilitation.

The County’s review of the effectiveness of past strategies indicates progress in providing senior housing and completing rehabilitation projects but highlights limited success in expanding emergency shelter capacity and farmworker housing resources. Fair housing outreach has improved awareness but continues to face challenges in reaching rural and farmworker communities.

To address these needs, Kings County proposes a comprehensive set of actions, including the expansion of affordable and supportive housing production, increased investment in rehabilitation and rental assistance programs, pursuit of additional state and federal funding sources (such as CDBG, HOME, and farmworker housing grants), implementation of anti-displacement strategies, promotion of mixed-income housing developments, and strengthened partnerships with nonprofit organizations and regional service providers.

This integrated strategy aims to address the full continuum of special housing needs, promote equity, and affirmatively further fair housing throughout Kings County.

Page 1100 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 33 Access to Opportunities
TCAC/HCD Opportunity Areas
The Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) and HCD Opportunity Maps help identify areas within the community, particularly in an area as vast as the unincorporated county, that provide stronger access to economic, environmental, or educational opportunities for residents or, conversely, provide more limited access to opportunities. This opportunity mapping can help highlight the need for housing element policies and programs that would help to remediate conditions in low-resource areas and areas of high segregation and poverty and to encourage better access for lower-income households and communities of color to housing in high-resource areas. Segregation is defined as the separation or isolation of a race/ethnic group, national origin group, individuals with disabilities, or other social group by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area, by barriers to social connection or dealings between persons or groups, by separate educational facilities, or by other discriminatory means.

As seen in Figure 9, most of the unincorporated Kings County is designated as Moderate resource, or area of High Segregation and Poverty towards the south. However, in the unincorporated county there exists a combination of moderate, low, resource designations and High segregation and poverty towards the south near the city of Avenal. The areas north of the city of Hanford seem to contain the highest resources. The areas of the unincorporated county near the Tule River are abundant with moderate resource designations.

Kings County is comprised of four incorporated cities (Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford, and Lemoore), four unincorporated community service areas (Armona, Home Garden, Kettleman City, and Stratford), and a few other smaller community pockets. The community of Armona, located west of the city of Hanford is located in a High resource census tract. The communities of Kettleman City and Stratford are in Moderate resource census tracts and Home Garden is in a Low resource census tract. According to the Census and DOF, Kings County had a total population of 152,486 in 2020; however, about 10% of that is represented by persons in group quarters, primarily the state prisons and Naval Air Station Lemoore. Thus, Table 9 presents the household population of Kings County at approximately 137,000 in 2020. Housing needs in Kings County are largely determined by population and employment growth, coupled with various demographic variables. Characteristics such as age, household size, occupation, and income combine to influence the type of housing needed and its affordability. Given that much of the unincorporated county has maintained a steady population for the past 30 years without much variation seeing merely a change by 6% when compared to the entire county whose household population has grown by more than 50% as seen in table. There has been a decline in population observed in unincorporated Kings County. Overall, according to DOF4 , Kings County is projected to reach approximately 153,400 by 2030, an increase of 12% over the 2020 population.
4 California, Department of Finance, P-4 Report, Population Projections for California Counties 2015-2030, March 2015

Page 1101 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 34 Table 9: Kings County Household Population Growth, 1990-2020 Jurisdiction
Household Population Change 1990-2020
1990 2000 2010 2020 Persons %
Unincorporated 32,122 31,271 32,165 30,074 2,048 6.40%
County Totals 89,469 109,332 131,402 136,964 47,495 53.10% Note: All numbers exclude persons in group quarters (State prisons and Naval Air station Lemoore) ; Sources:

Census 1990, 2000, 2010; Cal.DOF, , E5 and E8 Population and Housing Estimates.

Page 1102 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 35 Figure 9: COG Geography TCAC/HCD Opportunity Areas, 2023 Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC), Updated Jan 2023.

Page 1103 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 36 Transit Mobility
Transit mobility refers to an individual’s ability to navigate the community and region daily to access services, employment, schools, and other resources. Indicators of transit mobility include the extent of transit routes, proximity of transit stops to affordable housing, and frequency of transit.

There is a need to plan for and address the mobility needs of the County’s growing population. Public Transportation services are available to people with lower incomes, seniors, and persons with disabilities through the Kings Area Rural Transit (KART) system, overseen by the Kings County Area Public Transit Agency (KCAPTA) and through the City of Corcoran’s transit system, Corcoran Area Transit (CAT). Kings Area Regional Transit (KART) is Kings County’s public transportation provider. KART provides public transit service Monday through Friday and limited service on Saturdays. KART provides transportation services to the cities of Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford, Lemoore, and the unincorporated communities of Armona, Kettleman City, Stratford, , and Home Garden. KART Paratransit (origin to destination) is available to eligible certified ADA passengers. In addition, KART provides regular transportation services to Fresno and Visalia Monday through Friday. All KART bus routes begin and end at the KART Terminal located at 250 E. 7th Street Hanford, California, west of the AMTRAK station in Downtown Hanford.

AllTransit is a transit and connectivity analytic tool developed by the Center for Neighborhood Technology for the advancement of equitable communities and urban sustainability. The tool analyzes the transit frequency, routes, and access to determine an overall transit score at city, county, and regional levels.

AllTransit scores geographic regions (e.g., cities, counties, Metropolitan Statistical Areas [MSAs]) on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being complete transit connectivity. Figure 10 depicts Kings County’s AllTransit Performance score, including metrics representing average household transit access. Kings County’s overall score is 3.0, demonstrating “low” connectivity. It is important to note that this score is for Kings County as a whole, including incorporated areas, as AllTransit does not provide a score just for unincorporated county areas. Kings County’s score is consistent with comparable counties, which are typified by rural and semi-rural communities. However, the AllTransit methodology, which determines scores according to an “average” household, may not fully represent transit availability in unincorporated areas, as the estimate is an average of both incorporated and unincorporated areas.

As is shown in Figure 11, many high qualities transit stops in terms of facilities, accessibility and frequency of services are concentrated in the city of Hanford while they seem to be lacking in the other cities and unincorporated areas. It’s also evident that the connectivity is focused on moving people within cities rather than between cities. Most unincorporated areas in the central areas of Kings County are not served by transit, except for the Hanford area. Based on the information in the Kings County Transit Development Plan 2021 document, Kings County faces challenges in providing comprehensive transit services, especially in rural areas. The report identifies gaps in service and highlights the difficulty of connecting transitdependent residents living in remote areas to services in larger communities.

In addition, County staff has indicated that the County has commenced on a comprehensive General Plan update in 2025 that includes a Circulation Element and an Air Quality Element that will incorporate the countywide bikeway network in the Regional Active Transportation Plan adopted by the Kings County Association of Governments (KCAG). Staff also noted that an additional KART bus stop is located in Armona's Summers Point for its residents, and residents including farmworkers can ride-share and carpool through the CalVans vanpool program administered by KCAPTA.

Page 1104 of 1565 ends

KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 37 Figure 10: Kings County All Transit Performance Score
Source: AllTransit.cnt.org, 2022

Page 1105 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 38 Figure 11: Kings County High Quality Transit Stops and Transit Area (1/2 Mile) Source: Caltrans, 2022. U.S.; Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Updated 2022.

Page 1106 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 39 Housing Mobility
Housing tenure (owner vs. renter) influences several aspects of the local housing market. Residential mobility is influenced by tenure, with ownership housing evidencing a lower turnover rate than rental housing. The vacancy rate also indicates the match between the demand and supply of housing. Table 10 details housing tenure and vacancies in Kings County and incorporated communities according to the Census ACS 2016-2020 estimates. Vacancy rates of 5% to 6% for rental housing and 1.5% to 2.0% for ownership housing are generally considered to be optimum. A higher vacancy rate may indicate an excess supply of units, a softer market, and result in lower housing prices. A lower vacancy rate may indicate a shortage of housing and high competition for available housing, which generally leads to higher housing prices and diminished affordability.

Table 10: Household Tenure and Vacancy Rates
Housing Type
Unincorporated Kings County
Units % Units %
Occupied housing units 9,244 91.10% 43,604 94.20%
Owner-occupied housing units 4,298 42.40% 23,368 50.50% Avg. HH size of owner-occupied units N/A 3.12
Renter-occupied housing units 4,946 48.80% 20,236 43.70% Avg. HH size of renter-occupied units N/A 3.17
Vacant housing units 898 8.90% 2,663 5.80%
For rent 112 1.10% 446 1.00%
Rented, not occupied 25 0.20% 140 0.30%
For sale only 108 1.10% 426 0.90%
Sold, not occupied 70 0.70% 194 0.40%
For seasonal or occasional use 45 0.40% 54 0.10%
All other vacant 538 5.30% 1,403 3.00%
Homeowner vacancy rate N/A 1.80%
Rental vacancy rate N/A 2.10%
Total housing units 10,142 100.00% 46,267 100.00%
Source: Census, ACS 2016-2020, Tables DP04 and B25004
The balance between owner-occupied and rental housing, along with vacancy rates, shapes the housing market dynamics. For instance, areas with high owner occupancy and low vacancy rates may see property values appreciating, while areas with high rental vacancy rates might experience stagnating or declining property values. The demand exceeds the supply, driving up rental costs, which can disproportionately affect lower-income residents and contribute to housing insecurity. According to the census, the housing vacancy rate in Kings County was 1.8% among homeowner units and 2.1% for rental units. The proportion of renter-occupied housing units is higher in unincorporated Kings County (48.80%) compared to Kings County (43.70%). However, the vacancy rate varied among communities and was not available for most of

Page 1107 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 40 unincorporated Kings County.

Employment
Between 2010 and 2020, Kings County’s household population grew from approximately 131,402 to 136,964 persons, representing an increase of 4.2 percent, with projections estimating the County population to reach approximately 153,400 by 2030, reflecting a growth of 12 percent over 2020 estimates (Table 11).

Civilian employment growth trends are similarly tied to the County’s agricultural economy, with gradual diversification into service and logistics sectors. According to the California Employment Development Department (EDD), the County’s employment base is projected to grow by approximately 7.5 percent between 2020 and 2030.

The County's economy remains agriculturally based, with growing diversification into education, healthcare, and correctional facility employment. Employment projections from the California Employment Development Department (EDD) estimate continued modest employment growth, particularly in healthcare support, educational services, and food production sectors.

Table 11: Household Population and Civilian Employment Trends Year Household Population Civilian Employment
1990 89,469 28,000
2000 109,332 32,400
2010 131,402 38,000
2020 136,964 42,500
2030 (Projected) 153,400 46,000 (Projected)
Source: U.S. Census; CA DOF; CA EDD)
Kings County’s economy has an important impact on housing needs. Employment growth typically results in increased housing demand in areas that serve as regional employment centers. Moreover, the type of occupation and income levels for new employment also affects housing demand. This section describes the economic and employment patterns in Kings County and how these patterns influence housing needs.

Kings County supports a diversified economy as illustrated in Figure 12. This figure shows the proportion of jobs held by residents (civilian employed population 16 years and over) living in the County. Based on the Census ACS 2016-2020 information, the education, health care, social assistance industry was the largest employer of Kings County residents, providing approximately 10,800 jobs, or 20% of workforce.

As important as agriculture is to the County, the agriculture sector was the second largest employer of its residents, which employed 8,300 residents or 15% of the workforce. Kings County’s civilian labor force was estimated at 57,800, with an unemployment rate of 7.0% (not seasonally adjusted). This compares to the statewide unemployment rate of 4.1%. However, compared to recent trends, Kings County’s unemployment rate has decreased significantly from the 2020 annual average unemployment rate of 12.0%.

Historically, agriculture has played a key role in Kings County’s economy. Agriculturally oriented counties tend to have higher unemployment rates and greater seasonal variations in unemployment. Kings County is ranked 8th among California counties in agricultural production with an annual gross value of $2.5 billion.

Page 1108 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 41 According to the Kings County 2022 Annual Agricultural Crop Report, milk remains the County’s leading commodity, followed by pistachios (second) and cotton (third). With climate change and the long-term severe drought as well as the 2023 wet winter/spring, it is uncertain to what extent future water supplies will affect agriculture.

Figure 12: Employment by Industry of Kings County Workforce Source: Census ACS 2016-2020, Table DP03
According to County staff, key employers are located throughout the majority of the unincorporated areas of the County. The key employers include Leprino Foods (Lemoore), Central Valley Meat (unincorporated, south of Hanford), Naval Air Station Lemoore (west of Lemoore), Corcoran and Avenal State Prisons (Corcoran and Avenal), Kings County Government Center (Hanford), Adventist Health (Hanford), schools (spread throughout the County), Surf Ranch (unincorporated, approx. 2 miles south of Lemoore). In recent years, the construction of the High-Speed Rail project has provided jobs and is intended to include mixeduse, commercial zoning to surround Kings-Tulare Station. In the community of Kettleman City at I-5 interchange additional commercial development has occurred. Also, the 415-acre Jackson Ranch Specific Plan is planned for commercial, industrial, and agricultural uses and has begun the construction process.

While economic growth is in the County's future, it is anticipated that two key factories will soon close.

They include the Leprino East factories (Lemoore) with a loss of approximately 300 jobs, and the Del Monte tomato plant to close in the unincorporated area with a loss of approximately 400 jobs. Furthermore, the passing of State law to limit the amount of groundwater pumping in the County will impact the amount of farming activity in the County, and subsequently reduce the number of jobs in the agricultural industry in Kings County and surrounding Counties.

The County has also indicated that high speed internet access covers all of Kings County and according to Broadbandnow.com, 79% of people living within Kings County have access to internet at speeds of 100 Education, health care,
social assistance
20%
Agriculture
15%
Public admin.
13%
Retail trade
10%
Arts, entertainment,
recreation,
accomodation, food
services
8%
Manufacturing
7%
Professional, scientific,
management, admin.
7%
Transportation,
warehousing, utilities
6%
Construction
4%
Other services, except
public admin.
3%
Finance, insurance, real
estate
3%
Wholesale trade
3%
Information
1%

Page 1109 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 42 Mbps or better. However, the cost of high speed internet may limit some of King County's lower income residents. Additionally, there are known cellular access challenges in areas around the cities of Corcoran and Avenal depending upon the carrier. A new cell tower is to be built in Stratford to ease the cellular challenges in that community.

Jobs-Housing Balance and Commute Patterns
Commuting patterns in Kings County have an important implication for housing needs. Larger employers in the County (e.g., three state prisons, Naval Air Station Lemoore, and agricultural industries) generate a significant number of jobs. However, the workforce employed at these institutions or in the agricultural industries may live in other communities for a variety of reasons, including preferences, the availability of suitable housing, or other reasons.

Commuting patterns show the relationship between where people live and where they work. Long commuting distances increase traffic congestion that strains the existing overcrowded road and highways infrastructure systems that are often in need of maintenance. Long commuting distances also contribute to poor air quality, increases expenses to the commuting workforce, and has been shown to have negative consequences on personal health. One of the aims of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan is to direct new housing growth to employment centers to balance the jobs-housing ratio and decrease commuting distances.

Figure 13 illustrates the locates of high-quality transit stops and transit areas and jobs within 45 minutes transit commutes. According to the map, all high-quality transit stops are located in the City of Hanford and of the four unincorporated communities, Home Garden has the largest number of jobs within 45 minute transit commutes, which are followed by Armona and Stratford.

Table 12 shows that over one-third (37%) of the County’s workforce aged 16 years and older who do not work at home travel less than 15 minutes to work and another 32% of workers travel 15-30 minutes to work. The average time to work for countywide workers was 23 minutes.

Table 12: Travel Time to Work
Note: Workers included those 16 years and over who did not work from home.; Source: Census ACS 2016-2020 Table S0801
Travel Time to Work
Unincorporated Kings
County Kern County
Less than 15 minutes 35.80% 36.80%
15-30 minutes 37.40% 32.00%
30 to 59 minutes 22.50% 25.10%
60 or more minutes 4.30% 6.10%
Average Travel Time NA 23 min.

Page 1110 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 43 Figure 13: High Quality Transit Stops and Transit Area (1/2 Mile) & Jobs within 45-Minute Transit Commute Sources: Caltrans, 2022; Smart Locations Database, 2018.

Page 1111 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 44 Education
The Kings County Board of Education establishes the mission and primary objectives for the Kings County Superintendent of Schools and ensures that activities and programs remain focused on the goals identified within the California Department of Education educational rules and regulations. The Kings County Board of Education establishes the mission and primary objectives for the Kings County Superintendent of Schools and ensures that activities and programs remain focused on the goals identified within the California Department of Education educational rules and regulations. According to the Kings County office of education as of Oct 2021 there are a total of 19,429 students enrolled in elementary schools and about 8,179 students in high schools across the county as per data submitted by the districts. In the 2025 school year, there are 65 public schools serving 29,479 students in Kings County and six private schools serving 902 private students. Of all K-12 students in Kings County, 97% are educated in public schools as compared the state average of 90%.5 Figure 14 below shows the school districts in Kings County. It shows the communities of Armona and Home Garden are located in the Hanford Joint Union High School District, Stratford is in the Lemoore Union High School District, and Kettleman City is in the Reef-Sunset Unified School District. The top ranked public schools, based on a school's combined math and reading proficiency test score ranking, include R.J.Neutra Elementary (Lemoore High School District), Lemoore Middle College High School (Lemoore Union High School District), and Kings River-Hardwick Elementary School (Kings River Hardwick Elementary School District located in Hanford Joint Union High School District boundaries). 5 https://www.publicschoolreview.com/california/kings-county

Page 1112 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 45 Figure 14: School Districts in Kings County
Source: Kings County, Cal EM

Page 1113 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 46 Environmental Health
The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) reports CalEnviroScreen 4.0 scores for unincorporated county areas, suggesting relatively adverse environmental conditions throughout the county. According to OEHHA, except for some of the smaller tracts in the center of the cities of Hanford, Lemoore, and Corcoran the rest of the areas have scores above the 90th percentile. The environmental conditions in Kings County likely due to the dominance of commercial agricultural practices and natural resource extraction, both of which are known to have negative impacts on the surrounding areas resulting from air pollution and other contaminants.

The primary indicators leading to the high environmental scores as reported by OEHHA’s CalEnviroScreen vary across the county, but include ozone, particulate matter (PM) 2.5, diesel PM, pesticides, toxic releases, drinking water contaminants, chemical cleanup, lead in housing, groundwater threats, hazardous waste, impaired water, and solid waste. Ozone, diesel particulate, and PM2.5, forms of pollution generated by car traffic and industrial uses, score higher throughout the county. In the unincorporated county areas, pesticide use, groundwater threats, and solid waste facilities are more prevalent than in urbanized areas, reflecting the presence of agricultural industries and chemical and waste storage outside of urban areas. Nearly all of Kings County is Senate Bill (SB) 535-qualifying disadvantaged communities excluding areas around Lemoore, north of Hanford and some tracts in Corcoran. This indicates that the unincorporated county areas represent an area of potential concern regarding fair housing and disproportionate exposure to environmental hazards and a concentration of vulnerable populations.

Further, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) develops flood maps that identify areas with the highest risk of flooding, differentiating them by the degree of severity and frequency of flooding anticipated. In Kings County, while large pieces of including land just outside Lemoore and Corcoran, are classified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency at a high-risk for flooding, Hanford is not according to a map released by the Kings County Office of Emergency Services. Flood zonesinclude Zone AO, AE, AH, and A, which indicate the depth of the 1.0% annual chance of flooding, and areas with a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (see Figure 19 in the Environmental Constraint section). Lemoore and the Island District have many large swaths of land classified as high or moderate risk. West of Highway 41 along West Industry Avenue is one of the large swaths of high-risk land. North of town, at the intersection of Grangeville Boulevard and Highway 41 is another area classified as high risk. Corcoran is surrounded by both high-risk and flooded land to the west, south and north. The area inside city limits is largely not classified as high-risk, but the area just south of the city near Highway 43 is described by the map as flooded.

Hanford on the other hand has only a minor risk of flooding.

Disproportionate Housing Needs, Including Displacement
Risk
The assessment now identifies distinct patterns of housing need, homelessness risk, and displacement vulnerability by community. Home Garden and Stratford demonstrate higher rates of renter cost burden, with more than 55 percent of renter households spending over 30 percent of their income on housing.

Overcrowding rates exceed 30 percent in Kettleman City and Home Garden, indicating significant pressure on housing availability and affordability. Regarding homelessness, local service providers report that unsheltered homelessness is more concentrated near Hanford and Lemoore; however, emerging risks of

Page 1114 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 47 hidden homelessness — such as overcrowded households and housing instability — are evident in Armona and Home Garden. Access to transportation services and homeless assistance programs remains limited in the more remote areas of the unincorporated County.

The evaluation of housing conditions, based on input from code enforcement officials and local observations, identifies Home Garden and Armona as areas with greater need for rehabilitation and replacement of aging housing stock, due to a higher incidence of code enforcement cases related to substandard housing conditions.

Displacement risk has also been analyzed using local data and recent housing cost trends. Home Garden and Armona are identified as moderate-risk areas for displacement, where increases in rental costs and limited new affordable housing options contribute to vulnerability among low-income residents. These findings are incorporated into the County's updated fair housing priorities and program strategies to target areas of higher need with expanded housing support and anti-displacement efforts.

Overcrowding
Overcrowding is often closely related to household income and the cost of housing. The U.S. Census Bureau considers a household to be overcrowded when there is more than one person per room, excluding bathrooms and kitchens; and to be severely overcrowded when there are more than 1.5 occupants per room.

Overcrowded households are usually a reflection of the lack of adequate income for housing.

Table 13 details the percentage of households that live in overcrowded situations. Overcrowding is more prevalent among renters than owners. For example, countywide, approximately 12% of renters and 5% of owners reported more than one person per room resulting in overcrowding. Severe overcrowding among owners was 1.2%, while that for renters was 3.5%.

Table 13: Overcrowding by Tenure
Source: Census ACS 2016-2020, Table B25014
Occupants per Room Unincorporated Kings County Kings County Total households 9,244 43,604
Owner occupied: 4,298 23,368

0.50 or less 62.90% 60.70%

0.51 to 1.00 32.10% 34.20%

1.01 to 1.50 2.30% 3.90%

1.51 to 2.00 2.40% 0.70%

2.01 or more 0.20% 0.50%
Renter occupied: 4,946 20,236

0.50 or less 38.60% 39.70%

0.51 to 1.00 51.20% 48.10%

1.01 to 1.50 7.40% 8.70%

1.51 to 2.00 2.60% 2.90%

2.01 or more 0.20% 0.60%

Page 1115 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 48 Within unincorporated areas, overcrowding is less than that of the County as a whole. For instance, overcrowding was 4.9% and 10.2% for owners and renters, respectively. Severe overcrowding was in the unincorporated areas by tenancy was not pronounced (2.6% and 2.8% for owners and tenants, respectively).

Figure 15 shows overcrowding in Kings County.

The analysis of overcrowding, defined as more than one person per room, indicates that 11 percent of all households in the unincorporated area are overcrowded, with rates significantly higher among renter households (16 percent) compared to owner households (8 percent). Overcrowding is particularly concentrated in the communities of Home Garden and Kettleman City, where rates exceed 30 percent, based on U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates (2017–2021).

Overpayment
State and federal housing law defines overpayment as a household paying more than 30% of gross income for housing expenses, including utilities. Housing overpayment is especially problematic for lower-income households that have limited resources for other living expenses.

As shown in Table 14, a significant portion of lower-income households in each community overpaid for housing according to HUD CHAS data (special tabulations based on the Census ACS). However, the overpayment rate varied by tenure and income level. More than half of all very-low- and extremely-lowincome households in all jurisdictions, both owners and renters, were reported to be overpaying. In most communities, however, more rental households than owner households were overpaying. Few households with incomes above the median faced overpayment – often less than 10% of households.

According to HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data (2014–2018 and 2017– 2021 datasets), approximately 54 percent of renter households and 35 percent of owner households in the unincorporated County are cost-burdened, paying more than 30 percent of their income toward housing costs. Severe cost burden (paying more than 50 percent of income) affects 26 percent of renters and 16 percent of homeowners, with the highest rates among very low- and extremely low-income households.

Figure 16 shows overpayment by renters and Figure 17 shows the percentage of homeowners overpaying.

Page 1116 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 49 Table 14: Household Overpayment by Tenure
According to Zillow, the average home price in Kings County in 2020 was approximately $240,000 and in 2025 the price has risen to approximately $359,000, an increase of 50%. Of the four unincorporated communities, Kettleman City and Stratford had the lowest price of homes. Given that the median household income in Kings County is $68,750, the current average home price is outside the reach of many of the County residents.

The Housing Element integrates this analysis to accurately identify existing housing needs and inform the County’s targeted programs for rehabilitation assistance, affordable housing development, antiovercrowding efforts, and support services for cost-burdened and extremely low-income households.

Income Category Unincorporated Kings County Kings County Owners
<= 30% 84.60% 79.00%
>30% to <=50% 72.20% 68.60%
>50% to <=80% 35.50% 48.30%
>80% to <=100% 10.30% 32.80%
>100% 5.80% 7.40%
Total 20.50% 22.50%
Renters
<= 30% 78.30% 79.30%
>30% to <=50% 66.00% 78.30%
>50% to <=80% 56.80% 57.00%
>80% to <=100% 35.10% 22.50%
>100% 5.50% 6.40%
Total 40.50% 43.20%
Source: HUD CHAS data based on Census ACS 2014-2018

Page 1117 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 50 Figure 15: Overcrowding in Kings County
f Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD), ACS, 2017-2021

Page 1118 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 51 Figure 16: Overpayment by Renters (ACS, 2017-2021) – Tract Level Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD), ACS, 2017-2021

Page 1119 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 52 Figure 17: Percentage of Homeowners Overpaying
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD), ACS, 2017-2021

Page 1120 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 53 Housing Conditions
The County acknowledges the importance of maintaining an up-to-date understanding of local housing conditions. While prior Housing Elements relied on survey data conducted over ten years ago, this Housing Element incorporates updated qualitative information based on current local knowledge, input from local code enforcement officials, building permit data, and field observations.

The majority of the unincorporated housing stock was built prior to 1980, with Home Garden and Armona containing the oldest and most maintenance-challenged housing units. However, in the last 10 years, subdivision developments have occurred in north Armona, with lots sizes of approximately 4,800 square feet
Based on this updated assessment, housing conditions in unincorporated Kings County show moderate levels of deterioration in certain communities, particularly Home Garden and Armona. In addition, field observations and code enforcement records from 2018 to 2023 indicate that approximately 25 to 30 percent of residential units in Home Garden and Armona require moderate to substantial rehabilitation. Common deficiencies include aging roofs, outdated electrical and plumbing systems, structural wear, and signs of deferred maintenance. According to County staff, similar housing conditions are evident in all areas of the unincorporated County. Communities such as Kettleman City and Stratford also exhibit housing quality concerns, but at a slightly lower estimated rate of 15 to 20 percent of units needing rehabilitation.

Compared to the prior survey results, local knowledge suggests that overall housing conditions have remained relatively stable, with some localized worsening in areas experiencing higher renter occupancy and limited reinvestment.

In response to these findings, the County will implement targeted strategies to:
• Expand housing rehabilitation assistance programs, with priority given to high-need communities such as Home Garden, Armona, and Kettleman City;
• Support programs that preserve existing affordable housing stock; • Partner with nonprofit organizations to secure additional funding for housing repairs; • Promote proactive code enforcement combined with education and resources to assist homeowners in maintaining safe and healthy housing.

Extremely Low-Income Households
Kings County recognizes that Extremely Low-Income (ELI) households — those earning at or below 30 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) — face the most severe challenges in accessing safe and affordable housing. Based on HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data (2014– 2018), approximately 14.1 percent of renter households and 6.5 percent of owner households in unincorporated Kings County are categorized as ELI.

ELI households experience a range of disproportionate housing challenges, including:

Cost Burden: Severe cost burden — defined as spending more than 50 percent of household income on housing costs — affects a substantial portion of ELI households. Countywide, approximately 54 percent of renters and 35 percent of owners are cost-burdened, with the highest rates concentrated among ELI

Page 1121 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 54 households.

Overcrowding: ELI households are more likely to experience overcrowded living conditions.

Overcrowding rates among renter households, particularly in communities such as Home Garden and Kettleman City, exceed 30 percent.

Housing Quality: Many ELI households reside in aging housing stock requiring substantial rehabilitation. In Home Garden and Armona, up to 30 percent of residential units are estimated to need moderate to substantial repairs, based on local observations and code enforcement records.

A comparative analysis indicates that ELI households endure significantly higher rates of overcrowding, cost burden, and substandard housing conditions compared to higher-income households. These disproportionate housing challenges highlight the urgent need for targeted policy interventions.

To quantify the existing and projected housing needs for all income levels, including extremely low-income (ELI) households, the County’s total RHNA allocation for the 2024–2032 planning period is 561 units, distributed by income group as follows
Extremely Low- and Very Low-Income (0–50% AMI): 132 units Low-Income (51–80% AMI): 89 units
Moderate-Income (81–120% AMI): 106 units
Above Moderate-Income (>120% AMI): 234 units
Consistent with State Housing Element law and HCD guidance, the County has assumed that 50 percent of the very low-income category allocation (132 units) will represent projected need for extremely low-income (ELI) households, resulting in an estimated need for 66 ELI units. This quantification reflects the disproportionately higher housing cost burdens, overcrowding rates, and risk of homelessness among lower-income and extremely low-income households within the unincorporated County, as documented through HUD CHAS data and local surveys.

Page 1122 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 55 Homelessness
Homelessness is often the result of multiple factors that converge in a person’s life. The combination of loss of employment, inability to find a job because of the need for retraining, and high housing costs lead to some individuals and families losing their housing. For others, the loss of housing is due to chronic health problems, physical disabilities, mental health disabilities or drug and alcohol addictions along with an inability to access the services and long-term support needed to address these conditions. Obtaining an accurate assessment of the magnitude of the homeless population is difficult because many individuals are not visibly homeless but rather live with relatives or friends, in hotels/motels or shelters, and other temporary accommodations. To address the needs of homeless people in Kings County, the Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance (KTHA) conducted a Point-in-Time (PIT) survey of homeless people in these two counties in January 2022. The study used HUD’s definition of homelessness, which is defined as people who reside in emergency shelters, transitional housing, or places not meant for human habitation such as cars, parks, sidewalks, and abandoned buildings.

Table 15: Homeless Persons
Jurisdiction Estimated Homeless
Avenal 4
Corcoran 17
Hanford 260
Lemoore 8
Unincorporated area 24
Kings County totals 313
Source: Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance Point-in-Time Survey, 2022 Based on the 2022 PIT survey, which is presented in Table 15, the following portrait of the 313 homeless individuals counted in Kings County included:
• 22% chronically homeless
• 39% persons with disability
• 20% suffer from mental disability.
• 12% suffer from substance abuse problems.
• 11% victims of domestic violence
• 6% veterans
• 2% unaccompanied children
• 12% young adults under age 25 in 2022,
• 39% of the homeless population was housed in temporary living arrangements (31% in emergency shelter and 8% in transitional housing).
• Over half (61%) were unsheltered and homeless or in a car.

Page 1123 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 56 The table shows that the City of Hanford had the highest counted with 260 homeless individuals or 83% of the countywide total. This was followed by unincorporated areas with 24 homeless individuals. Avenal had the lowest count with four homeless individuals.

Table 16 lists the shelter facilities in Kings County that served the homeless. It identifies an inventory of 126 emergency shelter beds (78% use rate), 27 transitional housing beds (89% use rate), 64 permanent supportive housing beds (89% use rate), 15 other permanent housing beds (93% use rate), and 103 rapid rehousing beds (100% use rate) in Kings County. Additional emergency assistance is provided by the Salvation Army in Hanford, which provides short-term assistance in the form of food, financial assistance for rent and utility bills, motel vouchers and bus or plane tickets. Corcoran Christian Aid provides food, vouchers, and other types of emergency financial assistance within Corcoran.

Despite these services, a significant shortage in emergency shelters and transitional housing remains. In 2007 the State Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 2, which strengthened the planning and zoning requirements for emergency shelters and transitional/supportive housing. SB2 requires that all jurisdictions adopt zoning regulations that allow emergency shelters by-right in at least one zone, subject to objective development standards, or as an alternative, the jurisdiction may meet the need through a multijurisdictional agreement with up to three adjacent jurisdictions. As noted in the Constraints section of the FHA, all of the jurisdictions in Kings County have adopted zoning regulations for emergency shelters and transitional/supportive housing in response to SB 2.

Currently, Kings County does not have special standards or size requirements, but the County requires 1 parking space per 4 beds. Programs 4.8 and 4.20 are included in the Housing Plan to ensure consistency with state law. Program 4.20 will facilitate emergency shelters with sufficient capacity to accommodate the need for emergency shelters and in proximity to transportation and homeless services.

Page 1124 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 57 Table 16: Shelter Facilities in Kings County
Source: Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance, 2023
Displacement Risk
The Urban Displacement Project, a joint research and action initiative of the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Toronto, analyzes income patterns and housing availability to determine the level of displacement risk at the census tract level.

The EDR provides three layers of displacement information. The “Overall Displacement” map layer shows Total
Project Name & Organization
PIT
Beds
Use
Count
Use
Rate

EMERGENCY SHELTER
Barbara Saville Shelter - DV 15 4 27%
Barbara Saville Woman's Shelter 23 6 26%
EHA Kings 7 7 100%
PRK Holiday Lodge 57 57 100%
PRK Stardust Hotel 17 17 100%
Temporary Housing Program 7 7 100%
Total 126 98 78%

TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
KGM Men's Transitional 15 15 100%
KGM Women's Transitional 6 6 100%
New Song Academy 6 3 50%
Total 27 24 89%

PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING
Anchors II 6 4 67%
Anchors IV 6 5 83%
Grace Homes 13 13 100%
Hope Survives 6 6 100%
Kings County Act 28 28 100%
Kings VASH 5 1 20%
Total 64 57 89%

OTHER PERMANENT HOUSING
HAKC Emergency Housing Voucher 15 14 93%
Total 15 14 93%

RAPID REHOUSING
Bringing Families Home 16 16 100%
HANA 4 4 100%
Housing Support Program 76 76 100%
Kings Rapid Rehousing 1 1 100%
RRH4 Kings 6 6 100%
Total 103 103 100%

Page 1125 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 58 the number of income groups experiencing any displacement risk. The dark red tracts (2 income groups), our models estimate displacement (Elevated, High, or Extreme) for two income groups. In the light orange tracts categorized as “Probable”, one or all three income groups had to have been categorized as “Probable Displacement”. In Figure 18 it could be observed that all the cities in the county and the southern western region are at predominant risk of At-Risk displacement. "At risk of displacement" refers to the likelihood of residents, particularly low-income renter households, being forced to move out of their neighborhoods due to various factors. This concept is often evaluated in the context of gentrification, rising housing costs, and changing neighborhood dynamics.

As shown in Figure 18, of the four unincorporated communities, Home Garden is in the census tract identified as At Risk of Displacement. The other three communities are in census tract identified as Lower Displacement Risk.

According to the Urban Displacement Project's Estimated Displacement Risk (EDR) model for California, displacement risk is determined by evaluating census tract characteristics that are strongly correlated with a net loss of low-income renter populations. Essentially, a high displacement risk suggests that more low-income households are leaving a neighborhood than moving in, often due to factors like affordability, development pressures, or changes in the housing market.

Page 1126 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 59 Figure 18: Estimated Displacement Risk – Overall Displacement by Tract Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD), UCB – Urban Displacement Project, 2022

Page 1127 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 60 Identified Sites and Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) An analysis of identified housing sites has been conducted to assess the County's efforts to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) and to understand the distribution of sites relative to existing patterns of segregation, access to opportunity, and displacement risk. Sites have been evaluated by income group, geographic location at the sub-tract level (community-level analysis), and proximity to key opportunity indicators.

Of the total sites within the unincorporated County, as identified in Appendix B: Land Use Inventory, approximately 42% are designated for lower-income households (very low- and low-income categories), and 58% are designated for moderate- and above-moderate-income housing. Sites targeted for lowerincome households are primarily located in and around the unincorporated communities of Armona and Home Garden. According to the 2023 TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, these areas are classified as Moderate Resource areas, with limited proximity to High Resource or Highest Resource tracts. Meanwhile, sites suitable for moderate- and above-moderate-income development are more dispersed, including areas adjacent to Hanford, which falls within High Resource areas according to the same opportunity mapping.

At a finer geographic level, clustering of lower-income housing sites has been observed near Home Garden, an area with higher renter cost burden (57%), moderate overcrowding rates (35%), and moderate environmental health burdens based on CalEnviroScreen 4.0 data (scores ranging between the 60th–70th percentiles for cumulative pollution burden). Armona, while having slightly better access to transportation and schools, also shows moderate displacement risk according to Figure 18 of Estimated Displacement Risk. Conversely, Stratford and Kettleman City sites are more isolated, presenting challenges related to access to opportunity without substantial supportive infrastructure investments.

The County's site distribution strategy neither significantly exacerbates existing patterns of segregation nor severely concentrates poverty. However, without accompanying revitalization and anti-displacement programs, some areas may experience reinforced concentrations of lower-income households.

In response, Kings County has committed to further program actions, including:
• Prioritizing support for infrastructure improvements and service expansion in Armona and Home Garden;
• Establishing incentives for mixed-income developments in newly designated residential areas; • Targeting affordable housing production within proximity to higher-resource areas whenever feasible;
• Implementing anti-displacement strategies, including rental assistance programs, preservation of existing affordable housing, and community-based revitalization plans.

Through these strategies, Kings County seeks to ensure that the Housing Element not only meets RHNA obligations but actively advances fair housing choice, opportunity, and community integration across all income levels.

Page 1128 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 61 Emergency Shelter Compliance
In unincorporated Kings County, California, emergency shelters are permitted by-right in the Public Facilities (PF) zoning district, subject to a ministerial Site Plan Review process. This approach aligns with California Government Code § 65583(a) (4), which mandates that jurisdictions identify at least one zoning district where emergency shelters are allowed without discretionary review.

Development Standards in the PF Zone
Permitting Process: Emergency shelters in the PF zone undergo a ministerial Site Plan Review, ensuring compliance with objective development standards without requiring a conditional use permit.

Objective Standards: While specific standards are not detailed in the provided sources, they typically include requirements such as maximum number of beds, provision of on-site management, length of stay, security measures, and lighting. These standards are designed to ensure the health and safety of both shelter residents and the surrounding community without imposing undue constraints on the development of emergency shelters.

Suitability of the PF Zone
Proximity to Services: PF-zoned areas are strategically located near essential services, including healthcare facilities, social services, and employment centers, which are critical for individuals experiencing homelessness.

Access to Transportation: These areas are often situated within close proximity to public transportation routes, facilitating easy access for shelter residents.

Availability of Sites: The PF zone encompasses approximately 325 acres, providing ample capacity to accommodate additional emergency shelters.

Programmatic Commitments: Kings County has included Program 4.8 in its Housing Plan to ensure continued compliance with state law. This program commits to reviewing and amending zoning ordinances as necessary to facilitate the development of emergency shelters and to support the provision of transitional and supportive housing.

Employee Housing and Farmworker Compliance
Employee Housing
The Housing Element has been updated to ensure full compliance with the Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code, § 17000 et seq.), including Sections 17021.5, 17021.6, and 17021.8.

Zoning Consistency: In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5, the County confirms that employee housing for six or fewer persons is classified as a single-family residential use and is permitted by-right in all residential zones. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17021.6, the Housing Element affirms that employee housing consisting of no more than 12 units or 36 beds is permitted in agricultural zones in the same manner as other agricultural uses.

Ministerial Processing: In compliance with Section 17021.8, the Housing Element specifies that

Page 1129 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 62 qualifying employee housing developments are subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval process and are not subject to a conditional use permit. A program has been added to revise local procedures and Development Code language to reflect this requirement.

Parking Standards: The current requirement of two parking spaces per unit for farm labor housing (Table 4-4) has been reviewed and identified as a constraint. This standard exceeds the parking requirement for comparable residential uses. A program has been added to review and amend the Development Code to ensure that employee housing is not held to more restrictive parking requirements, consistent with state law.

Program Amendment: Housing Element Program 4.10 has been revised to reflect the County’s prior efforts to develop farmworker housing, including the 2003 Conditional Use Permit (CUP No. 02-13) approved for a 24-unit conversion project, which was not developed and has since expired.

A new or revised program commits the County to:
• Amend Development Code to incorporate statutory provisions; • Ensure ministerial review for eligible developments;
• Provide staff training on the Employee Housing Act; and • Review and revise development standards, including parking.

These updates ensure that zoning and permitting for employee housing are fully compliant with state law and that barriers to the development of farmworker housing are identified and removed.

Farmworkers
Recent Census data in Table 17 shows that 22% of total employed unincorporated Kings County civilian residents (16 years and over) worked in agriculture and related industries as compared to 15% countywide.

Of the four cities, the highest percentage of civilian workers in agricultural related jobs was Avenal, where 45% of its workers were in this industry. This was followed by Corcoran workers at 30%.

Kings County is one of the state’s major agricultural areas, ranking 8th among California counties in total agricultural production. According to the Kings County Agricultural Commissioner, 92% of the total land area in the County is devoted to farmland. Table 18 shows the County’s top three leading agricultural products in 2022 were milk ($999 million), pistachios ($228 million), and cotton ($192 million).

Table 19 presents the number of farms and hired farm workers in Kings County. According to the 2017 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Census estimates, there were 963 farms and 507 of those 963 farms hired a total of almost 7,000 farm workers countywide. The largest number of workers (5,820) were employed at farms with 10 or more employees or 83% of the countywide total number of hired workers.

Also, there were more permanent hired workers (worked more than 150 days) than seasonal workers (worked less than 150 days) for both farm operations with less than 10 employees and with more than 10 employees.

Page 1130 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 63 Table 17: Agricultural Employment by Jurisdiction
Table 18: Leading Agricultural Crops, Kings County
Crop Rank Value
Milk 1 $999,866,000
Pistachios 2 $228,785,000
Cotton 3 $192,811,000
Tomatoes, Processed 4 $177,492,000
Cattle & Calves 5 $151,274,000
Almonds, Total 6 $132,323,000
Corn, Silage 7 $123,941,000
Alfalfa, Hay 8 $67,540,000
Wheat, Silage 9 60,112,000
Plums 10 $55,245,000
Source: Kings County, Dept. of Agriculture, 2022 Crop Report, August 2023 Jurisdiction of Civilian Employed
Pop. (16 and over) Number of Agricultural Workers % of Total Workers Avenal 1,617 45%
Corcoran 1,275 30%
Hanford 2,213 9%
Lemoore 692 6%
Unincorporated 2,474 22%
Kings County 8,271 15%

Page 1131 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 64 Table 19: Hired Farm Labor-Workers, Kings County
Farmworkers
No. of Farms that
Hired Workers No. of Hired Workers
Percent of Total County
Hired Workers
Total Hired Farm Labor 507 6,998
Farm operations with less than 10 employees 351 1,178 17% Permanent (> 150 days) 275 1,034 15%
Seasonal (< 150 days) 246 677 10%
Farm operations with 10 or more employees 156 5,820 83% Permanent (> 150 days) 96 3,046 44%
Seasonal (< 150 days) 49 2,241 32%
Source: USDA, 2017 Census of Agriculture
Agricultural workers, and especially farmworkers, have special housing needs due to their relatively low wages. According to an article in Rural Migration News, the average hourly wage for all California farmworkers in the years 2015-2019 was approximately $12.6 . This is equivalent to approximately
$25,000/year for full-time work. As a result, farmworkers often overpay for housing (in relation to their income) and/or live in overcrowded and substandard living situations.

The nature of agricultural work also affects the specific housing needs of farm workers. For instance, farmworkers employed on a year-round basis generally live with their families and need permanent affordable housing much like other lower-income households. Migrant farmworkers who follow seasonal harvests generally need temporary housing only for the workers themselves.

California has a statewide shortage of farmworker housing projects. For instance, the number of agricultural employee housing facilities registered with the California HCD has dramatically declined since the 1950s.

Between 1955 and 1982, grower-registered facilities declined from 9,000 to 1,414 camps. By 1998, only 500 camps were registered with HCD, none of which were in Kings County. According to growers, the dramatic decline in labor camps is due to the high cost of maintaining housing and the climate of litigation facing growers who maintain camps. Additionally, most farm owners/managers hire most of their workers through temporary agencies for planting, picking, pruning, or other specific tasks, so that providing full-time housing for workers is not practical.

Although no farmworker camps exist in Kings County, the County does have a significant number of government-subsidized housing projects (e.g., Section 515 and public housing) that house farmworkers and their families. Many farmworkers live in mobile homes on the farming site. A new farmworker housing project was completed in Hanford during the 2003-2008 planning period. That project involved the renovation of an existing former motel into temporary and/or long-term, permanent agricultural employee housing. The project included 24 units plus parking, courtyard, children’s play areas and open space.

In addition, there is a 40-unit apartment complex in unincorporated Kettleman City that serves farm labor families. This apartment includes 10 two-bedroom units, 20 three-bedroom units, and 10 four-bedroom units, 6 https://migration.ucdavis.edu/rmn/blog/post/?id=2805

Page 1132 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 65 with approximately 70-100 farmworkers residing in the apartment complex. The Constraints analysis contains a discussion of each jurisdiction’s land use and zoning policies and regulations regarding farmworker housing.

In communities with large farmworker populations, farmworker housing needs are met through homeownership assistance and rehabilitation loans.

Most loans under both types of programs are issued to people working in the agricultural industry. Moreover, many occupants of Section 515 projects and other subsidized projects are also employed in the farming industry. In Lemoore the farmworker population is significantly smaller, although many farmworkers also access standard homeownership and/or rehabilitation loans. The Housing Plan (Chapter 5) includes programs to address the housing and supportive services needs of farm workers.

Page 1133 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 66 C. Housing Constraints
The following analysis of the existing governmental constraints is based on the assumption that the pending update of the Development Code will be adopted ahead of the adoption of the Housing Element and analyzes any constraints that would exist following the adoption of the update. Should the adoption of the update be delayed until after the adoption of the Housing Element, the County commits to making the zoning updates specified in Program 4.20. Pending changes are identified with footnotes.

Governmental Constraints
Kings County and the Cities of Avenal, Corcoran, and Hanford have their General Plans, Zoning Ordinances, development standards, and fees posted for public access on each of the jurisdiction’s respective websites.

General Plan Designations and Zoning Districts
The following Figures 20 – 30 provide General Plan corresponding Zoning designations for the incorporated cities of Kings County.

The County of Kings General Plan contains a number of land use designations that are implemented by zoning districts to support and facilitate residential development. The following table illustrates the type and intensity of residential development allowed through the County’s General Plan and Zoning maps and documents. The Agricultural and Resource categories, which permit residential in a more ancillary fashion at densities of one unit per 20 or 40 acres, are not listed below.

In addition to the range of residential units that are allowed in the designations outlined in the table, the County allows planned unit developments (PUDs) in areas designated as residential. A PUD may include a combination of different dwelling types and/or a variety of land uses which are made to complement each other and harmonize with existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity, by design. A PUD may be located in any area designated and zoned for residential use upon the granting of a use permit in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code.

This section provides a more complete and consistent evaluation of land use controls as potential constraints to the development of a variety of housing types, as required under Government Code § 65583(a)(5).

Analysis of Height Limits in RM Zone: While Table 4-3 summarizes the maximum height limits across zoning districts, the updated analysis specifically examines how height limits in the RM (Multi-Family Residential) zone may affect the feasibility of multifamily development. The analysis finds that current height limitations, when combined with other development standards (e.g., parking, setbacks), may restrict the ability to achieve maximum allowed densities in some cases. Based on these findings, the Element proposes modifications to height standards or implementation of flexible development incentives where appropriate. Comprehensive Review of Development Standards in All Residential and Mixed-Use Zones:

The Element now includes a systematic review of key residential development standards—including setbacks, lot coverage, minimum lot sizes, open space, and parking requirements—across all zoning districts that allow residential development, including Mixed-Use zones. This evaluation assesses:
• Each standard independently, to determine if it imposes undue constraints; • The cumulative effect of combined standards on development capacity;

Page 1134 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 67 • The impacts on housing cost, supply, and variety.

Clarification of Density Limits: The Element has been updated to reconcile previous inconsistencies in the discussion of maximum densities across residential and mixed-use zoning designations. Maximum allowable densities for each zone are now clearly stated and uniformly presented throughout the document.

Where inconsistencies were previously identified, corrections have been made to align land use policies with zoning standards and ensure clarity for both planners and developers.

Alignment with State Policy and Law: These actions align with the requirements outlined in HCD’s Building Blocks guidance for evaluating and addressing constraints to housing development and support the County’s goal of removing regulatory barriers and facilitating production of housing at all income levels.

Housing for Persons with Disabilities
This section addresses identified constraints on housing for persons with disabilities, including the County’s reasonable accommodation procedures and zoning standards for residential care facilities, in compliance with Government Code § 65583(a)(5).

Reasonable Accommodation Procedures. The County has clarified and expanded its description of the reasonable accommodation process for individuals with disabilities. Requests for accommodation may be submitted by individuals, developers, or service providers. The Community Development Agency reviews and processes these requests administratively. Minor requests are typically handled by staff within 30 days, while more complex cases may be elevated to the Planning Commission.

Decisions are based on findings that consider whether the requested accommodation is necessary to afford equal housing opportunity, whether it would impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the County, and whether it would fundamentally alter the County’s zoning framework. No known complaints or delays have been reported; however, the County will continue to monitor its procedures and proactively ensure that the process remains accessible and non-restrictive.

Program 4.11 (Housing for Persons with Disabilities) has been updated to include a review of the reasonable accommodation process, with the objective of streamlining procedures and improving access to information for individuals with disabilities.

Residential Care Facilities. Housing Element Table 4-2 has been revised to accurately reflect that residential care facilities serving seven or more persons are conditionally permitted in all residential zones.

The requirement for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for such facilities has been evaluated. While intended to maintain neighborhood compatibility, the CUP process may create time and cost barriers, particularly for housing designed to serve persons with disabilities. These requirements may pose compliance risks under the federal Fair Housing Act and the California Community Care Licensing Act if they unjustly limit housing opportunities.

As a corrective measure, Program 4.11 has been expanded to include a commitment to review the CUP requirement for larger residential care facilities. The County will allow such facilities by right, subject to appropriate performance standards, in at least one or more residential zones. Legal counsel will be consulted to ensure compliance with fair housing mandates.

Page 1135 of 1565 ends

APPENDIX D1: COUNTY OF KINGS FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS
KINGS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HOUSING ELEMENT | April 2026 | 68 Processing and Permit Procedures Analysis
The Public Works Department and the Community Development Agency are responsible for application intake, permit issuance, plan checking, and inspection services for public and private projects. The Departments provide public counter services, subdivision processing, various entitlements associated with development, and engineering and technical staff support to commercial and residential projects. Working in tandem, the primary objective is expeditious review and approval of development projects. County staff encourages applicants to contact them prior to completing applications, particularly for large projects.

This allows permitting and zoning issues to be discussed by the applicant and staff, resulting in more efficient processing.

The development approval process in the County is governed by three levels of decision-making bodies:

The Community Development Agency (and its Director), the Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors. As shown in Table 4-2, single- and multi-family development applications are typically permitted by right, subject only to review and issuance by County staff (the staff planner assigned to review the application) for compliance with development standards. A limited number of residential uses require Director Review and Approval (DRA), which extends the review and approval process from staff planners to include the Director of the Community Development Agency. Under the DRA process, the Director is the final approval body, but may defer action and refer the permit or approval application to the Commission for final determination if significant opposition is expressed by the public, except in the case of a Reasonable Accommodation.

Additional review involving the Planning Commission only occurs for a limited set of residential uses and zones, such as mobile home and manufactured housing community parks.

The Board of Supervisors are only involved when there is a request for a formal amendment to the General Plan, Zoning Map, or Development Code (including specific plans); development agreements; or when there is an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision (such as a request for a variance).

SenateBill 330. The County recently established a procedure to address SB 330. The requisite development review and preliminary application processes outlined in Senate Bill 330 are codified in the County’s code.7
Senate Bill 35. Projects are eligible for ministerial review if they satisfy the following criteria:
• Project is a multifamily housing development consisting of two or more units. • Project dedicates either 10% or 50% of units affordable to 80% of average median income (AMI) • Project site is on land zoned for residential or mixed-use residential use. • Project site is on land in an urbanized area where 75% of the perimeter of site is developed. • Project is consistent with objective zoning and design review standards. • Project site is not located on or in any of the following: (1) coastal zone, (2) prime farmland, or 7 As part of its pending Zoning Code update the County will add additional discussion of the SB 330 preliminary application process to its code. If the update is not adopted prior to the adoption of the Housing Element, the County commits to making these revisions as part of Program 20.

Page 1136 of 1565 ends

Hanford City CouncilMay 19, 2026

Hanford City Council
May 19, 2026