Councilmember Hagele had nothing to report.
Vice Mayor Herrod reported he attended the Pride event in Healdsburg, the Williams Selyem winery opening, the Anderson Zeigler opening, Good Morning Healdsburg, the Mayors and Councilmembers meeting in Sonoma, the SMART Ribbon cutting in Windsor and the Healdsburg High School graduation.
Mayor Mitchell reported she attended the No Kings rally in Healdsburg and announced she was appointed by Senator McGuire to the California Veterinary Medical Board Consumer Affairs Division.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:45 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ __________________________________ Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk
Item 6.h
628 of 676
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 6, 2025
SUBJECT: L&M Village Quarterly Update
PREPARED BY: Griselda Villarreal, Administrative Analyst II STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):
- Expand Affordable Housing Opportunities
- Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Receive the L&M Village Quarterly Update.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:
This item will be heard at a public meeting where time is set aside for public comment and participation. City staff and Reach for Home will continue to keep open communication with the neighbors of the project and the community at large with quarterly updates and as information is requested or needed. The most recent quarterly report was presented to the City Council on June 16, 2025.
BACKGROUND:
On October 26, 2021, the County of Sonoma approved $950,000 in Capital Match funding and $3,388,660 in operating subsidy for the L&M Village as part of Project Homekey Round 2.
On December 21, 2021, the City, in partnership with Reach for Home and Burbank Housing, was awarded $7,048,800 in Project Homekey funding by the State of California. The award included $5,720,000 in capital funding and $1,328,800 in operating subsidy.
On February 16, 2022, the City executed the State Standard Agreement and received the Project Homekey Round 2 program funds.
On May 3, 2022, the City closed escrow on the L&M Motel, bringing the property under City ownership.
Item 8.a
629 of 676
On November 21, 2022, the City adopted Resolution No. 173-2022, approving the Lease, Funding, and Service Agreement with Reach for Home for the operation of the L&M Village. The agreement established the Terms of Service and an annual project budget.
On October 30, 2024, the County of Sonoma executed an agreement with the City to provide operational funding for the L&M Village in the amount of $101 per unit, per day (22 units), not to exceed $644,160.
On February 10, 2025, the County executed a third modification to the operational funding agreement with the City to support L&M Village operations for Fiscal Year 2024–25, in an amount not to exceed $1,263,570.
On September 17, 2025, the City submitted a proposal to the Sonoma County Department of Health Services in response to the Measure O Pathways to Sustainability Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA), requesting $999,101 to continue operating the L&M Village.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
This report provides the City Council and the public with a quarterly update on the operational status, outcomes, trends, and financial standing of the L&M Village Program.
As of the previous quarterly update on June 16, 2025, the L&M Village Program continues to demonstrate measurable progress in addressing homelessness within the community. Much of this success is due to the ongoing efforts of the program’s case managers, who play a critical role in helping participants transition to permanent housing, supporting them through property viewings, housing applications, and connection to services.
Point-in-Time Count
While not a comprehensive measure of homelessness throughout the year, the Point-in-Time Homeless Count (PIT) offers a one-day snapshot of homelessness in Sonoma County. It is a federally required tool used by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and local jurisdictions to monitor trends and guide in the allocation of resources. Sonoma County and the City of Healdsburg took part in the annual PIT Count on January 31, 2025, and the results were published on September 3, 2025.
In 2025, the PIT Count recorded 1,952 individuals experiencing homelessness countywide, down from 2,835 in 2017, a 31% decrease over that period, as illustrated in the chart below.
Item 8.a
630 of 676
Source: Sonoma County 2025 Homelessness Point-In-Time County & Report, Sonoma County Continuum of Care Specifically for Healdsburg, the 2025 PIT Count identified 29 individuals experiencing homelessness, 12 unsheltered and 17 sheltered. This reflects a significant 42% decrease compared to 50 individuals in 2024, as shown in the figure below.
Source: Sonoma County 2025 Homelessness Point-In-Time County & Report, Sonoma County Continuum of Care Recent results demonstrate effective strategies underway in North County and Healdsburg:
• L&M Village, operated by Reach for Home, provides interim housing and supportive services that help residents stabilize.
• The City’s CORE Team and Social Services Team connect individuals with resources through trauma-informed outreach and case management.
• State Encampment Resolution Funding has supported the transition of individuals from the Russian River and other sites into safer housing.
Together, these efforts have resulted in fewer people living outdoors, more individuals accessing shelter, and steady declines in homelessness.
L&M Village Program Key Highlights
Participants in the L&M Village program are remaining for longer periods than in previous quarters, primarily due to housing and employment barriers in the broader community.
In response, the program continued to hold biweekly on-site workshops focused on housing navigation and employment readiness. These workshops are designed to better equip participants for long-term stability and independence.
Below are key highlights from the L&M Village Program since inception, with a focus on the most recent reporting period from June 6, 2025, through September 19, 2025:
• Number of Participants Served: A total of 104 participants were enrolled in the program reflecting ongoing engagement and utilization of services. • Successful Exits to Housing: 56 participants have successfully transitioned into housing, Item 8.a
631 of 676
marking a significant step towards stability.
• Housing Voucher Applications: 31 participants applied for and received housing vouchers.
• Health and Wellness: A total of 104 participants have accessed mental health services, with 22–25 individuals currently engaged in regular sessions. Reach for Home staff are working to ease transitions to community mental health providers upon program exit and are exploring expansion to include psychological services. • Income Progress: 65 out of the 104 participants increased their income through employment. 105 out of 104 increased their income through subsidies and assistance. • Activity Engagement: Nearly 80% of all participants are engaged in at least 2 activities per week, and nearly 90% are engaged in weekly case management. These activities consist of (partial listing):
• One-on-one counseling sessions
• Budgeting and cooking classes
• Employment search support
• Interview clothing assistance
• Daily living skills training
• Housing search and application classes
• Weekly healthcare visits by Providence Healthcare
• Active participation in Fentanyl awareness events
• Addiction recovery group on-site
Program Outcomes Snapshot
Item 8.a
632 of 676
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVES:
This item is intended to serve as an information update on the L&M Village project; therefore, no action is required.
FISCAL IMPACT:
In Fiscal Year 2024-25 operating expenses for the L&M Village totaled $839,231, representing the Lease, Funding, and Services Agreement costs with Reach for Home and City insurance costs.
These costs were primarily funded by reimbursements under the funding agreement with the County of Sonoma, however, the Measure S Affordable Housing Fund contributed $25,590 towards City insurance costs. The funding agreement with the County of Sonoma expired on June 30, 2025, and the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 includes appropriations for the Measure S Affordable Housing Funds to fully support the L&M Village operating costs. On September 17, 2025, the City submitted a proposal in response to the Measure O Pathways to Sustainability Notice of Funding Availability, requesting $999,101 to support ongoing operations of L&M Village in FY 25-26. The City also submitted requests for FY 26-27 and FY 27-28, and the application is currently under review.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Title 14, the California Code of Regulations, Section 15302(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) guidelines, the proposed action is an administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.
ATTACHMENTS:
Item 8.a
633 of 676
PowerPoint Presentation
Item 8.a
634 of 676
L&M Quarterly Update
(Q1)
October 6, 2025
Item 8.a
635 of 676
Overview
• Q1 Highlights
• Point-In-Time Homeless Count
• Data & Program Outcomes
• Supportive Services Offered
• Financial Status
• Conclusion & Future Activities
2 Item 8.a
636 of 676
Q1
Highlights
• Program Outcomes
• Interim-Housing Units for Northern Sonoma County residents increased to 47 units.
• December 9, 2024 - Launched the Keep People Housed
Homelessness Prevention Program.
• Point-in-Time Count – January 2025
• Staffing Updates
• Reach for Home is hired another Case Manager and a Supportive Services Assistant.
• Mental Health Internship Program success.
• Expanded services to include in-person and telehealth psychologist appointments to help expedite access and adherence to medication. • Russian River Keepers are continuing to keep the river clean and free of unauthorized access.
Item 8.a
637 of 676
2025
Point-in-Time
Count
2025 Point-in-Time Count (PIT)
The 2025 Point-in-Time (PIT) Homeless Count, conducted on January 31, 2025, indicates the following changes:
• Homelessness in Healdsburg decreased from 50 to 29 individuals. • Of the 29 individuals, 17 were sheltered at the L&M Village. • Homelessness in North County decreased from 152 to 91 individuals. • Countywide, homelessness decreased by approximately 23%.
Source: Sonoma County 2025 Homelessness Point-In-Time County & Report, Sonoma County Continuum of Care Item 8.a
638 of 676
2025
Historical
Point-in-Time
Count
• The 2025 PIP count marks a significant reduction. The current figures remain below historic levels, indicating progress from the City's efforts and partnerships. Recent results demonstrate effective strategies underway in North County and Healdsburg:
L&M Village Operations: Interim housing and supportive services provided by Reach for Home that help residents stabilize.
State Encampment Resolution Funding: Reach for Home and Sonoma County have supported the transition of individuals from the Russian River and other sites into safer housing.
City Outreach Teams: The CORE Team and Police Social Services Team offer trauma-informed outreach and case management.
Supportive Services Investment: Ongoing City funding for outreach, stabilization, and prevention of homelessness recurrence.
Source: Sonoma County 2025 Homelessness Point-In-Time County & Report, Sonoma County Continuum of Care Item 8.a
639 of 676
Program
Outcomes
Data Point Cumulative Total as
of Last Report
6/16/2025
Quarter 1
Activity
L&M Village Totals
Since Program Start
Participants Served 95 13 108
Successful Exits to Housing 46 10 56
Housing Voucher Applications 26 5 31
Health & Wellness -
Accessed Mental Health
86 0 86
(0 this quarter)
Health & Wellness -
Accessed Medical
Services/Appointments
94 10 104
Income Progress -
Income Increase by
Employment
56 9 65
Income Progress -
Income Increase by Utilizing
Subsidies (Food Stamps/SSI)
93 12 105
Item 8.a
640 of 676
Occupancy By
Race/Ethnicity
74%
19%
5% 2%
Occupancy By Race & Ethnicity
L&M Village
White Hispanic Native Black
73%
14%
3%
2% 8%
Race & Ethnicity of Those
Experiencing Homelessness
Healdsburg
White Hispanic Native Black Unknown
Item 8.a
641 of 676
Supportive
Services
Offered
Nearly 80% of participants engaged in at least 2
activities/week
One-on-one counseling sessions
Food pantry access
Budgeting and cooking classes
Employment search support
Haircut services
Interview clothing assistance
Daily living skills training
Housing search and application classes
Weekly healthcare visits by Providence Healthcare
Active participation in Fentanyl awareness events
Collaboration with Face to Face for HIV testing
Addiction recovery group on-site
Item 8.a
642 of 676
Homekey
Funding
Funding Sources Amount Status Use
Homekey Capital $6,168,000 Awarded Acquisition/Construction Homekey Operations $660,800 Awarded L&M Operations
County Capital Match $950,000 Awarded Acquisition/Construction Early Occupancy Bonus $220,000 Awarded Operations
County Operating $1,263,570 Awarded Operations FY 23-24 & FY 24-25
Total
Measure O Pathways to
Sustainability
Proposal Submitted
9/17/2025
$9,262,370
$999,101 Operations
Item 8.a
643 of 676
Conclusion
&
Future
Activities
Challenges
Lapse in County Operational Funding
Additional Interim-Housing Units
Permanent Supportive Housing Units
Opportunities
Employment connections
Dry Creek Commons set-asides
Heritage Park in Windsor
Measure O Pathways to Sustainability NOFA
Item 8.a
644 of 676
Discussion
&
Questions
Item 8.a
645 of 676
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 6, 2025
SUBJECT: 1408 University Street
PREPARED BY: Griselda Villarreal, Administrative Analyst II STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):
- Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
By motion, direct staff to either (1) maintain City ownership of 1408 University Street, (2) initiate compliance with the California Surplus Land Act for potential disposition, or (3) obtain further analysis prior to taking action.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:
This item is being presented for the first time to request preliminary policy direction on the future use or disposition of 1408 University Street (“Property”). On March 17, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-2025, approving the termination of the deed restriction with Shriners Hospitals for Children. That action allowed consideration of alternative uses but did not address the surplus land designation or disposition.
For this meeting, staff notified individuals who had previously expressed interest in the Property and households within 300 feet of the site to ensure nearby residents and stakeholders were informed and could provide input. If City Council elects to retain the Property, no further action is required. If City Council directs staff to pursue compliance with the Surplus Land Act, staff will return with a surplus declaration resolution and conduct additional outreach at that time.
BACKGROUND:
On January 9, 1957, Healdsburg residents Cecil G. Gauntlett and Claire E. Gauntlett (“Grantors”) conveyed 1408 University Street (“Property”) by grant deed (“Grant Deed”) to the City of Healdsburg.
On January 22, 1957, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12 (1957) approving and accepting the Grant Deed, which restricted the use of the Property to a municipal Fire House Station or other municipal purposes, subject to the written approval of the Grantors (the “Deed Restriction”).
Item 8.b
646 of 676
In December 1970, following the passing of both Grantors, the estate and the interest in the Deed Restriction passed to Shriners Hospitals for Children (“Shriners”).
In 1989, an Engineering Geological Investigation concluded that the Property was unsuitable for a Fire House or other similar municipal purposes due to geological and topographical limitations.
On August 22, 2022, the City received a building permit to construct a Healdsburg Fire Substation on a 0.85-acre parcel at 1804 Healdsburg Avenue, eliminating the need for a Municipal Fire House Station at 1408 University Street.
On December 12, 2023, with construction of the Fire Substation underway at the Healdsburg Avenue site, City Staff initiated discussions with Shriners regarding potential removal of the Deed Restriction.
On January 15, 2024, real estate evaluation consultant Dana W. Burwell provided an appraisal report estimating the market value of the Property.
On February 14, 2025, Shriners executed the Deed Restriction Termination Agreement and Quitclaim Deed (“Agreement”), releasing the Deed Restriction.
On March 17, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-2025, approving the Agreement and releasing the Deed Restriction. In the Agreement, the City agreed to use any proceeds from any sale of the Property (in the event that the Surplus Land Act process does not result in affordable housing development) for municipal purposes, in the form of affordable housing initiatives.
In July 2025, Munselle Civil Engineering prepared an Easement Exhibit confirming the location of three existing easements on the Property.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
On March 17, 2025, the City Council approved the release of the deed restriction on the vacant City-owned lot at 1408 University Street. Removal of this restriction has broadened the City’s options for the future use or disposition of the property for other municipal purposes including:
Retaining the property for another municipal purpose, including affordable housing development: This option would allow the City to hold the parcel without immediate action, preserving flexibility for future municipal needs or long-term housing strategies. Selling the property, with proceeds directed toward municipal purposes in the form of affordable housing initiatives: Disposition through sale would require compliance with the California Surplus Land Act and the California Environmental Quality Act. This approach could generate one-time revenue that would be used to support affordable housing.
Item 8.b
647 of 676
Property Description
The Property consists of a vacant, City-owned lot located at 1408 University Street (APN 002- 533-002) with an area of approximately 1.23 acres. The site has direct access to University Street, and the rear of the parcel slopes from 220 feet to 250 feet, limiting its development potential. A geotechnical investigation and subsequent analysis determined that the Property is not suitable for development as a municipal fire station, as originally intended in the grant deed, or other similar municipal purpose due to geological and topographical constraints.
The Property borders residential units along its northernmost, southwestern, and southern portions.
It also borders the Good Shepherd Lutheran Church and Little Lambs Preschool along its southeastern edge. Additionally, a small area at the northeastern portion of the site borders County property, as depicted in the black-shaded region on the map above.
Zoning
The Property is zoned R-1-12,500, which requires a minimum parcel size of 12,500 square feet, with a General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (1 to 3 units per acre). The site is also within the Hillside Overlay District, which imposes additional development requirements.
Item 8.b
648 of 676
Under Healdsburg Land Use Code Chapter 20.12, Article I: Hillside Overlay, properties in this overlay are subject to minimum lot area, width, and depth standards (e.g., minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet and minimum lot width of 60 feet).
The overlay also requires geotechnical and slope stability reports, constrains grading and building design on sloped terrain, and increases the cost and complexity of potential development.
Easements
The Property contains three easements along its southernmost portion: a public utility easement, a Pacific Telephone and Telegraph easement, and a private water and sewer easement, as shown in Item 8.b
649 of 676
the aerial mapping Easement Exhibit prepared by Munselle Civil Engineering in July 2025 (pictured above).
Summary of Disposition Options:
Disposition for another municipal purpose, including affordable housing development The City Council could decide to retain 1408 University Street for future consideration of another municipal purpose. This approach would not require the City to take immediate action and is consistent with allowable uses of City-owned land. Holding the property preserves flexibility should new priorities evolve in the future, whether that be for open space, community facilities, or other civic needs. Retention would also leave open the possibility of revisiting the site in the future as part of the City’s housing strategy.
One option that has been evaluated is retaining the property for affordable housing development.
Staff has met with potential affordable housing developers to discuss the site; however, the general consensus was that its physical constraints and current market dynamics make it challenging to develop. The 1.23-acre parcel lies within the Hillside Overlay District, where grading and design requirements add complexity and cost. Past geotechnical studies have identified slope stability concerns that require specialized engineering solutions. In addition, three recorded easements run along the southern boundary of the property, further reducing the usable area for development.
While the existing R-1-12,500 zoning, combined with new State initiatives such as SB 9 (urban lot splits and duplexes in single-family zones), could allow subdivision for a higher residential yield, affordable housing developers typically seek sites that support larger-scale, financially efficient projects. The combination of hillside conditions, site constraints, and the relatively small size of the parcel make it less competitive compared to other infill sites in Healdsburg.
Retention of the property for future evaluation is an option, but developing this parcel for affordable housing would require significant investment with a low unit-yield and may not represent the City’s most cost-effective approach.
Disposition for sale with proceeds directed toward municipal purposes in the form of affordable housing initiatives
Another option is to declare the property surplus and proceed with its sale, subject to compliance with the California Surplus Land Act. The City has limited developable land available for future affordable housing. Experience has shown that the most effective housing projects stem from the City owning the land. The 155 Dry Creek Commons and Saggio Hills developments are prime examples of these projects. Proceeds from the sale of 1408 University Street could be invested to acquire properties more suitable for affordable housing development, where larger unit yields can be achieved and traditional financing programs work best.
If the City were to pursue this approach, staff believes that the most likely buyers would pursue a low-density, market-rate housing project on the site, likely consisting of one or two dwelling units on relatively large lots.
Item 8.b
650 of 676
Alternatively, the City Council could consider directing the proceeds to support the establishment of a Community Land Trust, consistent with its adopted housing goals, or hold the funds for future municipal priorities related to affordable housing. This approach would ensure that even if the parcel itself is not developed for housing, its disposition would still advance the City’s broader housing and community development objectives.
Surplus Land Act (SLA)
If City Council chooses to direct staff to begin the steps necessary to sell or transfer the Property, staff must initiate and comply with the requirements of the SLA. This process would begin with declaring the property as surplus or determining whether a proposed project or use qualifies for an exemption under the Act, with the City making the appropriate findings.
If no qualifying project exists, or if an exemption does not apply, and the City wishes to consider offers from interested parties, it must issue a Notice of Availability and conduct good-faith negotiations with any respondents – in particular, those interested in developing the parcel for affordable housing. After the negotiation period concludes, the City would determine how to proceed with the Property’s disposition in compliance with the SLA.
To comply with the SLA, the following are the required actionable steps:
1. Action to Declare Property Surplus: To start the SLA process, the City Council would take action at a regular public meeting to declare the land to be surplus and not necessary for the City’s use, consistent with Gov. Code § 54221(b)(1). If the City Council directs staff to initiate this process, staff will return with a Resolution for the City Council’s consideration, as well as CEQA findings.
2. Mailing of Notices of Availability: After the public meeting, City staff would prepare and send written notices of availability (NOA) by certified mail or email to various entities designated in the SLA, including:
Low- and Moderate-Income Housing NOA. Includes the California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD) and any local public entity as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50079 within whose jurisdiction the surplus land is located and any “housing sponsors” that have notified HCD of their interest in surplus land that is in the county in which the surplus land is located or in all California counties. Park, Recreation and Open Space NOA. Includes any park or recreation department of the City and County, any regional park authority having jurisdiction within the area in which the land is situated, and the State Resources Agency or any agency that may succeed to its powers.
School Facilities NOA. Includes any school district in whose jurisdiction the land is located.
Item 8.b
651 of 676
Infill Opportunity Zone NOA (if applicable). If the City determines that the property is located in an infill opportunity zone, then an NOA must be sent to any county, city, city and county, successor agency to a former redevelopment agency, public transportation agency, or housing authority within whose jurisdiction the surplus land is located for the purpose of developing property located within an infill opportunity zone. (Gov. Code § 54222.)
If multiple entities express interest in the property, priority must be given for affordable housing.
If multiple affordable housing proposals are received, priority must be given to the prospective purchaser offering the lowest level of average affordability. (Gov. Code § 54227).
3. Deadline for Notifying City of Interest in Purchasing: A purchaser desiring to purchase or lease the surplus land for one of the preferred statutory purposes must notify the City in writing of its interest in purchasing or leasing within 60 days, after the City’s NOA is sent via certified mail or provided via electronic mail. (Gov. Code § 54222(e)).
If no expression of interest is received by expiration of the 60-day NOA period, then the surplus lands process ends at that point, and the City can notify HCD of the conclusion of the City’s process and enter into a contract for the sale of the property.
4. Timeline for Negotiations with Preferred Purchaser: If the City receives a notice of interest from a preferred purchaser identified in the Act, then the City must enter into good faith negotiations with that entity to determine a mutually satisfactory sales price and terms. If the price or terms cannot be agreed upon after a good faith negotiation period of not less than 90 days, then the City may dispose of the land without further regard to the Act, except that Government Code section 54233 (requiring recordation of affordability covenants to be applicable when and if the property is ever developed for residential uses) shall apply. The negotiating period commences on the date the notice of interest is received by the City and ends 90 days thereafter. (Gov. Code § 54223).
5. Notice of Surplus Lands Compliance to HCD: Prior to agreeing to terms for the disposition of surplus land, the City must provide to HCD a description of the NOAs sent, and negotiations conducted with any responding entities, if applicable, and a copy of any restrictions to be recorded against the property.
After compliance with all of the above, the City may proceed to negotiate and thereafter enter into a contract for sale.
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:
Approval of this item does not have a direct correlation to environmental stewardship.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council may consider the following options:
Item 8.b
652 of 676
1. Direct staff to initiate compliance with the California Surplus Land Act (Government Code § 54220 et seq.) for the purpose of selling or otherwise transferring the Property.
2. Direct staff not to proceed with disposition of the Property at this time, maintaining City ownership and foregoing surplus designation.
3. Direct staff to obtain additional information or conduct further analysis prior to taking any action regarding the potential disposition of the Property.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Property located at 1408 University Street was originally conveyed to the City at no cost. The recent removal of the deed restriction has expanded the City’s options for future use or disposition of the Property, including the potential for marketing and sale, subject to City Council direction.
Should the City Council direct staff to proceed with compliance under the California Surplus Land Act and ultimately approve the sale of the property, the transaction would generate one-time revenues for the City. Final proceeds would be determined by market conditions at the time of sale and subject to terms approved by the City Council.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Requesting City Council direction on whether to initiate compliance with the California Surplus Land Act, retain City ownership, or request additional information is not a “project” under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. This action is administrative in nature and will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment. No development, permit, or entitlement is being proposed at this time, and any CEQA analysis would be premature because “too little is known about environmental impacts to which it might lead to allow those impacts to be meaningfully analyzed.” (Friends of the Sierra Railroad v. Tuolumne Park & Recreation Dist. (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 643, 664.)
Even if the action were deemed a “project,” it would be exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the common-sense exemption, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility of a significant effect on the environment. CEQA review would occur if and when a specific disposition or use of the Property is proposed.
ATTACHMENT(S):
• Resolution No. 18-2025
Item 8.b
653 of 676
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. 18-2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEALDSBURG APPROVING A DEED RESTRICTION
TERMINATION AND QUITCLAIM DEED BETWEEN THE
CITY OF HEALDSBURG AND SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR
CHILDREN, ASSIGNEES OF THE ESTATE OF CLAIRE E.
GAUNTLETT, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1408
UNIVERSITY STREET (APN 002-533-002), AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
AND QUITCLAIM DEED AND FINDING THE ACTION
EXEMPT FROM CEQA
WHEREAS, on January 9, 1957, Cecil G. Gauntlett and Claire E. Gauntlett, his wife (together, the “Grantors”), owners of that certain real property (“Real Property”) located at 1408 University Street, Healdsburg, California (APN 002-533-002), executed a grant deed (“Grant Deed”) (Book 1507, Page 126 [Official Records 125]), F 7893 of the Official Records of the County of Sonoma, State of California) conveying the Property to the City at no cost; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 1957, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12 (1957) approving and accepting the Grant Deed conveyance of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Grant Deed restricts the use of the Property to a Municipal Fire House Station or other municipal purposes, subject to the written approval of the Grantors (the “Deed Restriction”); and
WHEREAS, upon death of the Grantors, their estate, including the right to enforce the Deed Restriction, passed to Shriners Hospitals for Children (“Shriners”) as of December 1970; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined through thorough analysis, including a geotechnical investigation, that the Property is not suitable for development as a Municipal Fire House Station or other similar municipal purposes due to geological and topographical limitations; and WHEREAS, the City is required to comply with the California Surplus Land Act (Government Code§ 54220 et seq.) (the “SLA”), which mandates that public agencies first issue a Notice of Availability for non-exempt surplus land to certain interested parties, groups or entities, including affordable housing developers and the California Department of Housing and Community Development; and
WHEREAS, Shriners has agreed to remove the Deed Restriction from the Property to allow the City to market the Property free and clear by executing the Deed Restriction Termination and Quitclaim Deed, attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which will allow the City to market the Property free and clear (subject to SLA compliance).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg that it finds the foregoing recitals are true and correct, and they are hereby incorporated by reference into this Resolution.
Item 8.b
654 of 676
Item 8.b
655 of 676
Item 8.b
656 of 676
4857-8662-6546 v3
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF THE
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Community Development Department
City of Healdsburg
401 Grove Street
Healdsburg, CA 95448
WITH COPY TO:
Shriners Hospitals for Children
2900 N. Rocky Point Dr.
Tampa, FL 33607
EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES,
BUILDING HOMES & JOBS TRUST FUND
FEE & DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX:
Gov. Code § 27383, § 27388.1(a)(2)(D), Rev &
Tax Code § 1192
(SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY)
DEED RESTRICTION TERMINATION AND QUITCLAIM DEED
(1408 University Street)
THIS DEED RESTRICTION TERMINATION AND QUITCLAIM DEED (1408 University Street), made this ___ day of _____, 202_ (“Termination and Quitclaim Deed”), by and between SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN, a non-profit organization (“Shriners”) and The CITY OF HEALDSBURG, a municipal corporation (“City”). Shriners and City may be individually referred to herein as a “Party,” or may be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on January 9, 1957, Cecil G. Gauntlett and Claire E. Gauntlett, his wife, owners of that certain real property commonly known as 1408 University Street, Healdsburg, California (Assessor Parcel Number 002-533-002-000 ), as more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Property”) and incorporated herein by this reference, executed that certain Grant Deed (Book 1507, Page 126 [Official Records 125]), F 7893 of the Official Records of the County of Sonoma, State of California) conveying the Property to the City at no cost. A true and correct copy of the Grant Deed is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, on January 22, 1957 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12 (1957) approving and accepting the Grant Deed conveyance of the Property; and Item 8.b
657 of 676
4857-8662-6546 v3
WHEREAS, the Grant Deed restricts the use of the Property to a municipal fire house station or other municipal purposes, subject to the written approval of the Grantors (the “Deed Restriction”); and
WHEREAS, the Parties are of the understanding and belief that Cecil G. Gauntlett was survived in death by his wife, Claire E. Gauntlett, who upon her death had no surviving relatives and whose estate, including the right to enforce the Deed Restriction, passed to Shriners as of December 1970; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined through thorough analysis, including a geotechnical investigation, that the Property is not suitable for development as a firehouse or other similar municipal purposes due to geological and topographical limitations; and WHEREAS, the City is required to comply with the California Surplus Land Act (Government Code § 54220 et seq.), which mandates that public agencies first issue a Notice of Availability for non-exempt surplus land to certain interested parties, groups or entities, including affordable housing developers and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to sell the Property in the event that the Surplus Land Act process does not result in affordable housing development, and to use any sale proceeds for municipal purposes in the form of affordable housing initiatives, and has requested Shriners to remove the Deed Restriction from the Property to allow the City to market the Property free and clear; and WHEREAS, Shriners has agreed to City’s request.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, Shriners hereby agrees as follows:
1. Shriners does hereby cancel, terminate, release, discharge, and expunge the Deed Restriction, at the request of the City.
2. Shriners does hereby remise, release, and quitclaim to the City and its successors and assigns, all Shriners’ right, title and interest in the Property.
3. This Termination and Quitclaim Deed has also been delivered and recorded for the purpose of releasing the Property from the Deed Restriction.
4. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Shriners from any claim, demand, loss, liability, damage, or expense (including reasonable attorney’s fees) due to the City’s use of the Property for any purpose other than a firehouse or similar municipal purpose.
Signatures are on the following page
Item 8.b
658 of 676
4857-8662-6546 v3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Shriners has executed this Termination and Quitclaim Deed as of the day and year below and effective as of the day and year first above written.
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN,
a non-profit organization
By: ______________________________
Name: ____________________________
Its: ______________________________
Date: ________________
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ______________ )
On ____________________, 20__ before me, _____________________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: ___________________________________ (seal)
Item 8.b
659 of 676
4857-8662-6546 v3
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the attached instrument is hereby accepted by order of the City Manager on behalf of the City Council of the City of Healdsburg, pursuant to the authority conferred by City Council Resolution No. _______-202_, dated _______________________________ and grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
CITY OF HEALDSBURG, a municipal corporation
By: _____________________
Jeffrey Kay, City Manager
Date:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ______________ )
On ____________________, 20__ before me, _____________________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: ___________________________________ (seal)
Item 8.b
660 of 676
4857-8662-6546 v3
EXHIBIT A
Item 8.b
661 of 676
4857-8662-6546 v3
EXHIBIT B
GRANT DEED
Item 8.b
662 of 676
Item 8.b
663 of 676
Item 8.b
664 of 676
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 6, 2025
SUBJECT: Appointment of a new Planning Commissioner
PREPARED BY: Raina Allan, City Clerk
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):
- Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
By motion, appoint one applicant to the Planning Commission for a term of one year and nine months due to expire June 30, 2027.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:
The Planning Commission vacancy was published in the Press Democrat and the Healdsburg Tribune on July 24, 2025, July 31, 2025, and August 7, 2025. Information on the vacancy was also posted on the City’s social media platforms, the City website, posted in the bi-weekly City Manager’s Update, and sent by email.
BACKGROUND:
At the September 2, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council formed a subcommittee comprised of Vice Mayor Herrod and Councilmember Kelley to interview applicants interested in serving on the Planning Commission. The City Clerk received seven applications. Two applicants withdrew their applications, The five applicants interviewed are listed below:
• James Gentry
• Mat Humphrey
• Erin Miller
• Hank Scotch
• Christina Schadlich
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
The City Council subcommittee will make their recommendation at the City Council meeting. City Council will have the opportunity to discuss the recommendation.
Item 8.c
665 of 676
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council could opt to not take the Subcommittee’s recommendation. In that case City Council could appoint other applicants to the vacancies or direct staff to restart the recruitment process for the vacancy.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact related to the proposed action.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Title 14, the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(5) of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) guidelines, the proposed action is an administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.
ATTACHMENT(S):
None.
Item 8.c
666 of 676
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 6, 2025
SUBJECT: City Council Subcommittee to Interview Arts and Culture Commission Applicants
PREPARED BY: Raina Allan, City Clerk
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):
- Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Appoint a City Council Subcommittee to interview the applicants for the Arts and Culture Commission.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:
The Arts and Culture Commission vacancy was published in the Press Democrat and the Healdsburg Tribune on August 28, 2025, September 4, 2025, and September 11, 2025. Information on the vacancy was posted on the City’s social media platforms, the City website, included in the bi-weekly City Manager’s Update, and distributed to the students at Healdsburg High School.
BACKGROUND:
On July 22, 2025, a vacancy occurred on the Arts and Culture Commission due to a Commissioner resignation. The vacancy is for the remainder of the term that runs through January 1, 2028. In late August, City Council provided direction to staff to fill the vacancy by conducting a standard recruitment.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Staff recommends the City Council form a subcommittee to interview the Arts and Culture Commission applicants and make recommendations to the full City Council at the October 20, 2025, meeting on the best qualified candidate to fill the position.
The application period closed on September 11, 2025. Staff received two applications from local youth in the community. Staff will schedule interviews after the subcommittee has been formed.
The applicants are listed below:
Item 8.d
667 of 676
• Camila Rauda
• Ava Wolske
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council could pursue an alternative plan to make the appointments without the formation of a subcommittee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact related to the proposed action.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Title 14, the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(5) of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) guidelines, the proposed action is an administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Arts and Culture Commission Applications
Item 8.d
668 of 676
Item 8.d
669 of 676
Item 8.d
670 of 676
Item 8.d
671 of 676
Item 8.d
672 of 676
Item 8.d
673 of 676
Item 8.d
674 of 676
10/01/2025 – Page 1
CITY OF HEALDSBURG
CITY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
(NOTE: The schedule is tentative and subject to change pending final publication and posting of the City Council meeting agenda) October 20, 2025 Foss Creek Clean-up Winner
SMART Sales Tax Presentation
Accept the Dry Creek Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Project as complete Accept the Healdsburg Fire Station 2024 Reroofing Project as complete Declaring Vehicles and Equipment as Surplus
Villa Chanticleer Lease Amendment - Utilities
Approval of Minutes
Professional Services Agreement with XX to provide Project Initiation Document (PID) Preparation Services for the US 101 / Dry Creek Road Interchange Improvements Project Capital Improvement Program Budget Carry-Overs
November 3, 2025 Employee Anniversaries – Jarrod Dericco (15 Years), Patrick Fuss (10 Years) and Allison Hight (5 Years) Badger Park Redevelopment CEQA and Master Plan Approval 2025 Building Code Adoption – 1st reading
Badger Park Schematic Design Contract
Council Protocol Update
Foley Family Community Pavilion Operational Plan Review City Council Meeting Schedule for 2026
November 17, 2025 Corazon Lease Agreement
2025 Building Code – 2nd Reading
Housing Legislation Land Use Code Amendments 1st Reading Solid Waste Rate Adjustments
Item 12.a
675 of 676
10/01/2025 – Page 2
December 1, 2025 Employee Anniversaries – Randy Long (5 Years) 2026 Special Event Partnerships and Master Calendar
Sports Organization Affiliation Agreements
Revenue Options for Infrastructure and Road Repair
December 15, 2025 Housing Legislation Land Use Code Amendments 2nd Reading 2025-26 City Council Goal Update
2025 Local Appointments List pursuant to The Maddy Act
Appointments of Council Members to Various Boards and Commissions for 2025 Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor for 2026
(NOTE: The schedule is tentative and subject to change pending final publication and posting of the City Council meeting agenda) Item 12.a
676 of 676