Agenda — Hemet City Council, December 13, 2022 (part 5 of 13)

19.B

Page 554 of 1916 ends

Contact
Regional Office
550 S. Hope Street, Suite 560
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Headquarters
717 17th Street, Suite 1850
Denver, CO 80202

Page 317 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 555 of 1916 ends

10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Investment Report

Page 318 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 556 of 1916 ends

T om Tight | Managing Director
Direct: (407) 588-9391
Mobile: (407) 765-0761
[email protected]
Mark Creger | Director, Portfolio Management
Direct: (213) 545-7452
Mobile: (323) 573-9529
[email protected]
John Grady | Managing Director
Direct: (407) 588-0525
Mobile: (407) 701-8002
[email protected]
Manuel N. San Luis | Vice President, Portfolio Manage-
ment
Direct: (213) 545-8605
Mobile: (213) 509-3758
[email protected]
Relationship Managers Portfolio Manager
Relationship Management T eam
T able of Contents
Executive Summary
• Portfolio Overview 3
• Maturity Distribution 4
• Rating Distribution 5
• Security Distribution – Market Value 6
• Security Distribution – Historical Cost 7
Supporting Reports
• Portfolio Holdings 8
• Transactions 12
• Income 13
• GASB 40 15
• Portfolio Activity Summary 20
Disclaimers

Page 319 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 557 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
3 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Portfolio Overview
09/30/22 10/31/22
Duration 2.461 2.373
Years to Effective Maturity 2.595 2.504
Years to Final Maturity 2.595 2.504
Coupon Rate 1.850 1.846
Book Yield 2.203 2.201
Market Yield 4.331 4.595
Benchmark Yield -- --
Portfolio Summary
Asset Allocation
Portfolio Characteristics
Summary 09/30/22 10/31/22
Historical Cost $34,667,010.94 $34,721,055.92
Book Value 34,671,589.25 34,736,302.91
Accrued Interest 118,552.65 114,530.96
Net Pending Transactions 0.00 0.00
Book Value Plus Accrued $34,790,141.90 $34,850,833.87
Net Unrealized Gain/Loss (1,642,280.05) (1,789,036.94) Market Value Plus Accrued $33,147,861.85 $33,061,796.93 Period Income Income
Interest Income $54,085.79
Net Amortization/Accretion Income 10,668.68
Net Income $64,754.47
Income Summary
Detail may not add to total due to rounding.

Executive Summary

Page 320 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 558 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
4 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Maturity Distribution by Security Type
Portfolio Overview
Issuer Value
United States 60.32%
Farm Credit System 10.62%
Federal Home Loan Banks 4.65%
Federal National Mortgage Association 3.57%
PACCAR Inc 3.54%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.02%
Maryland Department of Housing and
Community Development 2.80%
Caterpillar Inc. 2.69%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 2.69%
Toyota Motor Corporation 2.55%
T op T en Holdings Maturity Distribution by Type
Security Distribution 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months 1-2 Y ears 2-3 Y ears 3-4 Y ears 4-5 Y ears 5+ Y ears Portfolio T otal CASH $92,426.87 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $92,426.87
CD 446,983.91 446,983.91
CORP 998,633.73 2,011,467.76 1,523,612.76 4,533,714.26
FED INST (GSE) 2,347,465.02 2,440,010.41 1,764,422.64 566,163.54 7,118,061.62 MUNI 926,291.67 926,291.67
US GOV 3,447,441.56 5,755,922.55 3,922,083.44 3,002,298.67 3,816,572.39 19,944,318.61 TOTAL $92,426.87 $998,633.73 -- $3,447,441.56 $8,103,387.57 $8,820,545.53 $7,216,625.74 $4,382,735.93 -- $33,061,796.93 • Maturity Distribution

Page 321 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 559 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
5 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Portfolio Overview
S&P Rating Distribution Moody’s Rating Distribution
Allocation by Standard and Poor’s Rating Allocation by Moody’s Rating S&P Rating Distribution Oct 31, 2022
Ending Balance
Portfolio
Allocation
Short T erm Rating Distribution
A-1+ $0.00 0.00%
A-1
A-2
T otal Short T erm Ratings $0.00 0.00%
Long T erm Rating Distribution
AAA $92,426.87 0.28%
AA $28,695,735.75 86.79%
A $3,122,063.20 9.44%
Below A
Not Rated $1,151,571.12 3.48%
T otal Long T erm Ratings $33,061,796.93 100.00%
Portfolio T otal $33,061,796.93 100.00%
Moody's Rating Distribution Oct 31, 2022
Ending Balance
Portfolio
Allocation
Short T erm Rating Distribution
P-1 $0.00 0.00%
P-2
T otal Short T erm Ratings $0.00 0.00%
Long T erm Rating Distribution
Aaa $27,789,528.89 84.05%
Aa $1,147,996.13 3.47%
A $3,898,992.47 11.79%
Below A
Not Rated $225,279.45 0.68%
T otal Long T erm Ratings $33,061,796.93 100.00%
Portfolio T otal $33,061,796.93 100.00%
• Rating Distribution

Page 322 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 560 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
6 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Market Value Basis Security Distribution
Asset Balance by Security Type
Security Distribution Sep 30, 2022
Ending Balance
Sep 30, 2022
Portfolio Allocation
Oct 31, 2022
Ending Balance
Oct 31, 2022
Portfolio Allocation
Change in
Allocation Book Yield
Cash $38,381.89 0.12% $92,426.87 0.28% 0.16% 0.00%
U.S. Treasury Notes $20,048,560.91 60.48% $19,944,318.61 60.32% (0.16%) 2.10% Federal Instrumentality (GSE) 7,145,323.99 21.56% 7,118,061.62 21.53% (0.03%) 2.26% Corporate Notes $4,534,914.28 13.68% $4,533,714.26 13.71% 0.03% 2.68% CD 450,234.95 1.36% 446,983.91 1.35% (0.01%) 0.65%
Municipal Bonds 930,445.83 2.81% 926,291.67 2.80% (0.01%) 2.64% Portfolio T otal $33,147,861.85 100.00% $33,061,796.93 100.00% 2.20% Portfolio Overview
• Security Distribution – Market Value

Page 323 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 561 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
7 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Historic Cost Basis Security Distribution
Asset Balance by Security Type
Portfolio Overview
Security Distribution Sep 30, 2022
Ending Balance
Sep 30, 2022
Portfolio Allocation
Oct 31, 2022
Ending Balance
Oct 31, 2022
Portfolio Allocation
Change in
Allocation Book Yield
Cash $38,381.89 0.11% $92,426.87 0.27% 0.16% 0.00%
U.S. Treasury Notes $20,801,165.05 60.00% $20,801,165.05 59.91% (0.09%) 2.10% Federal Instrumentality (GSE) 7,577,427.00 21.86% 7,577,427.00 21.82% (0.03%) 2.26% Corporate Notes $4,731,667.00 13.65% $4,731,667.00 13.63% (0.02%) 2.68% CD 499,000.00 1.44% 499,000.00 1.44% (0.00%) 0.65%
Municipal Bonds 1,019,370.00 2.94% 1,019,370.00 2.94% (0.00%) 2.64% Portfolio T otal $34,667,010.94 100.00% $34,721,055.92 100.00% 2.20% • Security Distribution – Historical Cost

Page 324 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 562 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
8 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Description
Identifier
Coupon
Effective
Maturity
Final Maturity
Duration
Trade Date
Settle Date
Par Value Original Cost
Book Value
Market Value
Market Price
MV + Accrued
Accrued Balance
Net Unrealized
Gain/Loss
% of Market
Value
Callable
Next Call Date
Book Yield
YTM
YTC
S&P
Moody's
CASH 0.00%
Cash
CCYUSD

0.00%
10/31/22
10/31/22

0.00 --
-- 92,426.87 $92,426.87
$92,426.87
$92,426.87

1.00 $92,426.87
$0.00 $0.00 0.28% N
--

0.00%

0.00%
AAA
Aaa

CASH TOTAL
10/31/22
10/31/22

0.00 --
-- 92,426.87 $92,426.87
$92,426.87
$92,426.87

1.00 $92,426.87
$0.00 $0.00 0.28% N
--

0.00%

0.00%
AAA
Aaa
US GOV 0.00%

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828S92

1.25%
07/31/23
07/31/23

0.73 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,180,000.00 $1,178,156.25
$1,179,039.27
$1,150,592.04

97.51 $1,154,319.62
$3,727.58 ($28,447.23) 3.49% N
--

1.36%

4.67%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828T26

1.38%
09/30/23
09/30/23

0.89 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,180,000.00 1,178,709.37
1,179,262.82
1,146,397.14

97.15 1,147,823.51
1,426.37 (32,865.68) 3.47% N
--

1.44%

4.59%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828T91

1.62%
10/31/23
10/31/23

0.97 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,180,000.00 1,182,719.53
1,181,612.23
1,145,245.46

97.05 1,145,298.43

52.97 (36,366.77) 3.46% N
--

1.49%

4.67%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CDR9

0.75%
12/31/23
12/31/23

1.13 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,180,000.00 1,163,452.34
1,169,581.11
1,127,775.56

95.57 1,130,757.63
2,982.07 (41,805.55) 3.42% N
--

1.52%

4.69%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CDV0

0.88%
01/31/24
01/31/24

1.21 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,180,000.00 1,165,342.19
1,170,532.63
1,125,701.12

95.40 1,128,310.43
2,609.31 (44,831.51) 3.41% N
--

1.53%

4.71%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828X70

2.00%
04/30/24
04/30/24

1.45 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,215,000.00 1,225,441.40
1,222,162.07
1,168,250.44

96.15 1,168,317.57

67.13 (53,911.62) 3.53% N
--

1.60%

4.69%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128286Z8

1.75%
06/30/24
06/30/24

1.60 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,215,000.00 1,218,654.49
1,217,588.42
1,159,281.32

95.41 1,166,445.85
7,164.54 (58,307.11) 3.53% N
--

1.62%

4.64%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y87

1.75%
07/31/24
07/31/24

1.68 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,215,000.00 1,218,559.57
1,217,557.44
1,156,717.66

95.20 1,162,091.07
5,373.40 (60,839.77) 3.51% N
--

1.63%

4.63%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YM6

1.50%
10/31/24
10/31/24

1.93 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,215,000.00 1,209,494.53
1,210,898.99
1,145,279.66

94.26 1,145,330.00

50.35 (65,619.33) 3.46% N
--

1.67%

4.53%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128283J7

2.12%
11/30/24
11/30/24

1.98 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,215,000.00 1,229,380.67
1,225,821.10
1,156,717.66

95.20 1,167,581.29
10,863.63 (69,103.43) 3.53% N
--

1.69%

4.57%
--
AA+
Aaa
Portfolio Holdings
Supporting Reports

Page 325 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 563 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
9 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Description
Identifier
Coupon
Effective
Maturity
Final Maturity
Duration
Trade Date
Settle Date
Par Value Original Cost
Book Value
Market Value
Market Price
MV + Accrued
Accrued Balance
Net Unrealized
Gain/Loss
% of Market
Value
Callable
Next Call Date
Book Yield
YTM
YTC
S&P
Moody's

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YV6

1.50%
11/30/24
11/30/24

2.00 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,215,000.00 1,208,782.62
1,210,321.57
1,142,479.08

94.03 1,150,147.52
7,668.44 (67,842.49) 3.48% N
--

1.69%

4.54%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y79

2.88%
07/31/25
07/31/25

2.59 09/20/22
09/21/22 475,000.00 461,529.30
462,058.32
455,573.45

95.91 459,024.62
3,451.17 (6,484.87) 1.39% N
--

3.93%

4.47%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128286A3

2.62%
01/31/26
01/31/26

3.04 09/20/22
09/21/22 750,000.00 719,941.41
720,944.99
709,014.00

94.54 713,989.37
4,975.37 (11,930.99) 2.16% N
--

3.91%

4.45%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y95

1.88%
07/31/26
07/31/26

3.54 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,255,000.00 1,256,568.75
1,256,326.36
1,147,000.98

91.39 1,152,947.73
5,946.76 (109,325.38) 3.49% N
--

1.85%

4.39%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YG9

1.62%
09/30/26
09/30/26

3.72 02/22/22
02/24/22 1,255,000.00 1,243,234.38
1,244,986.26
1,133,568.71

90.32 1,135,361.57
1,792.86 (111,417.55) 3.43% N
--

1.84%

4.34%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CEF4

2.50%
03/31/27
03/31/27

4.10 09/20/22
09/21/22 1,850,000.00 1,751,357.42
1,753,805.57
1,715,947.15

92.75 1,720,013.08
4,065.93 (37,858.42) 5.20% N
--

3.79%

4.32%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CEN7

2.75%
04/30/27
04/30/27

4.16 08/18/22
08/22/22 1,675,000.00 1,653,473.63
1,654,366.37
1,569,069.65

93.68 1,569,196.89
127.24 (85,296.72) 4.75% N
--

3.05%

4.31%
--
AA+
Aaa

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128282R0

2.25%
08/15/27
08/15/27

4.44 09/20/22
09/21/22 575,000.00 536,367.19
537,252.57
524,620.22

91.24 527,362.41
2,742.19 (12,632.35) 1.60% N
--

3.76%

4.29%
--
AA+
Aaa

US GOV TOTAL
03/31/25
03/31/25

2.28 --
-- 21,025,000.00 $20,801,165.05
$20,814,118.09
$19,879,231.30

94.59 $19,944,318.61
$65,087.31 ($934,886.78) 60.32% N
--

2.10%

4.53%
--
AA+
Aaa
GSE 0.00%

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS

FUNDING CORP
3133ENG20

3.30%
08/15/24
08/15/24

1.70 08/11/22
08/15/22 1,200,000.00 $1,200,504.00
$1,200,450.22
$1,173,433.02

97.79 $1,181,793.02
$8,360.00 ($27,017.20) 3.57% N
--

3.28%

4.60%
--
AA+
Aaa

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS
3130A2UW4

2.88%
09/13/24
09/13/24

1.78 08/11/22
08/12/22 1,200,000.00 1,190,364.00
1,191,386.96
1,161,072.00

96.76 1,165,672.00
4,600.00 (30,314.96) 3.53% N
--

3.28%

4.71%
--
AA+
Aaa

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS
3130AQF40

1.00%
12/20/24
12/20/24

2.06 08/17/22
08/19/22 400,000.00 379,496.00
381,272.69
370,597.76

92.65 372,053.32
1,455.56 (10,674.93) 1.13% N
--

3.30%

4.65%
--
AA+
Aaa
Portfolio Holdings
Supporting Reports

Page 326 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 564 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
10 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Description
Identifier
Coupon
Effective
Maturity
Final Maturity
Duration
Trade Date
Settle Date
Par Value Original Cost
Book Value
Market Value
Market Price
MV + Accrued
Accrued Balance
Net Unrealized
Gain/Loss
% of Market
Value
Callable
Next Call Date
Book Yield
YTM
YTC
S&P
Moody's

FEDERAL NATIONAL

MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
3135G03U5

0.62%
04/22/25
04/22/25

2.40 08/11/22
08/12/22 1,300,000.00 1,212,679.00
1,219,867.01
1,179,812.49

90.75 1,180,015.62
203.12 (40,054.52) 3.57% N
--

3.25%

4.62%
--
AA+
Aaa

FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORP
3134GWWT9

0.55%
09/30/25
09/30/25

2.82 09/24/20
09/30/20 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
887,467.87

88.75 887,941.48
473.61 (112,532.13) 2.69% Y
12/30/22

0.55%

4.73%

76.66%
AA+
Aaa

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS

FUNDING CORP
3133EMSK9

0.84%
03/02/26
03/02/26

3.21 02/25/21
02/28/21 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
881,829.39

88.18 883,206.06
1,376.67 (118,170.61) 2.67% Y
11/04/22

0.84%

4.71%
803.74%
AA+
Aaa

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS

FUNDING CORP
3133EMSU7

0.80%
03/09/26
03/09/26

3.23 03/02/21
03/09/21 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
880,061.03

88.01 881,216.59
1,155.56 (119,938.97) 2.67% Y
03/09/23

0.80%

4.71%

39.19%
AA+
Aaa

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS

FUNDING CORP
3133ENG87

2.92%
08/17/27
08/17/27

4.37 08/17/22
08/19/22 600,000.00 594,384.00
594,611.84
562,562.21

93.76 566,163.54
3,601.33 (32,049.63) 1.71% N
--

3.12%

4.38%
--
AA+
Aaa

GSE TOTAL
07/13/25
07/13/25

2.58 --
-- 7,700,000.00 $7,577,427.00
$7,587,588.72
$7,096,835.77

92.33 $7,118,061.62
$21,225.85 ($490,752.95) 21.53% --

2.26%

4.65%
306.32%
AA+
Aaa
MUNI 0.00%

MARYLAND ST CMNTY DEV

ADMIN DEPT HSG & CMNTY
DEV
57419RD28

2.86%
09/01/26
09/01/26

3.53 08/29/16
09/01/16 1,000,000.00 $1,019,370.00
$1,006,101.02
$921,520.00

92.15 $926,291.67
$4,771.67 ($84,581.02) 2.80% Y
09/01/25

2.64%

5.14%

5.91%
NA
Aa1

MUNI TOTAL
09/01/26
09/01/26

3.53 08/29/16
09/01/16 1,000,000.00 $1,019,370.00
$1,006,101.02
$921,520.00

92.15 $926,291.67
$4,771.67 ($84,581.02) 2.80% Y
09/01/25

2.64%

5.14%

5.91%
NA
Aa1
CORP 0.00%
AMAZON.COM INC
023135AW6

2.40%
02/22/23
02/22/23

0.31 03/27/19
03/29/19 1,000,000.00 $998,140.00
$999,852.51
$994,033.73

99.40 $998,633.73
$4,600.00 ($5,818.78) 3.02% Y
01/22/23

2.45%

4.34%

5.06%
AA
A1

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT
CORP
89236TGT6

1.80%
02/13/25
02/13/25

2.18 08/05/22
08/09/22 900,000.00 862,353.00
865,794.08
838,365.85

93.15 841,875.85
3,510.00 (27,428.23) 2.55% N
--

3.56%

5.01%
--
A+
A1
Portfolio Holdings
Supporting Reports

Page 327 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 565 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
11 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Description
Identifier
Coupon
Effective
Maturity
Final Maturity
Duration
Trade Date
Settle Date
Par Value Original Cost
Book Value
Market Value
Market Price
MV + Accrued
Accrued Balance
Net Unrealized
Gain/Loss
% of Market
Value
Callable
Next Call Date
Book Yield
YTM
YTC
S&P
Moody's

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP
69371RR99

3.55%
08/11/25
08/11/25

2.58 08/03/22
08/11/22 1,200,000.00 1,199,148.00
1,199,211.74
1,160,125.25

96.68 1,169,591.91
9,466.67 (39,086.50) 3.54% N
--

3.58%

4.84%
--
A+
A1

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL

SERVICES CORP
14913R2H9

0.80%
11/13/25
11/13/25

2.92 01/19/21
01/21/21 1,000,000.00 1,004,240.00
1,002,673.83
885,157.64

88.52 888,890.97
3,733.33 (117,516.19) 2.69% N
--

0.71%

4.92%
--
A
A2

APPLE INC
037833DN7

2.05%
09/11/26
09/11/26

3.62 08/10/22
08/12/22 700,000.00 667,786.00
669,536.06
632,728.73

90.39 634,721.79
1,993.06 (36,807.32) 1.92% Y
07/11/26

3.26%

4.81%

4.93%
AA+
Aaa

CORP TOTAL
03/06/25
03/06/25

2.22 --
-- 4,800,000.00 $4,731,667.00
$4,737,068.21
$4,510,411.20

94.14 $4,533,714.26
$23,303.06 ($226,657.01) 13.71% --

2.68%

4.77%

5.01%
A+
A1
CD 0.00%
Merrick Bank Corporation
59013KHV1

0.80%
05/29/25
05/29/25

2.54 05/14/20
05/29/20 249,000.00 $249,000.00
$249,000.00
$225,263.08

90.47 $225,279.45
$16.37 ($23,736.92) 0.68% N
--

0.80%

4.74%
--
NA
NA
BMW Bank of North America
05580AXF6

0.50%
09/25/25
09/25/25

2.82 09/21/20
09/25/20 250,000.00 250,000.00
250,000.00
221,577.75

88.63 221,704.46
126.71 (28,422.25) 0.67% N
--

0.50%

4.73%
--
A
Aa3

CD TOTAL
07/27/25
07/27/25

2.68 --
-- 499,000.00 $499,000.00
$499,000.00
$446,840.83

89.56 $446,983.91
$143.08 ($52,159.17) 1.35% N
--

0.65%

4.73%
--
A
Aa3

PORTFOLIO TOTAL
05/03/25
05/03/25

2.37 --
-- 35,116,426.87 $34,721,055.92
$34,736,302.91
$32,947,265.97

93.65 $33,061,796.93
$114,530.96 ($1,789,036.94) 100.00% --

2.20%

4.60%
155.74%
AA
Aa1
Portfolio Holdings
Supporting Reports

Page 328 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 566 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
12 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Description
Identifier
Current Units Type Trade Date Settle Date Price Principal Realized Gain/Loss
Broker Amount
Transactions

Page 329 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 567 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
13 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Income
Description
Identifier
Final
Maturity
Current Units Interest Income Realized Gain
Realized Loss
Accretion
Income
Amortization
Expense
Misc
Income
Net Income Interest Received
Interest Due
AMAZON.COM INC
023135AW6
02/22/23 1,000,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00
$0.00
$40.46 $0.00 $0.00 $2,040.46 $0.00
$0.00

APPLE INC
037833DN7
09/11/26 700,000.00 1,195.83 0.00

0.00 669.77 0.00 0.00 1,865.61 0.00

0.00 BMW Bank of North America
05580AXF6
09/25/25 250,000.00 106.16 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106.16 0.00

0.00 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP
14913R2H9
11/13/25 1,000,000.00 666.67 0.00

0.00 0.00 (74.81) 0.00 591.86 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS
3130A2UW4
09/13/24 1,200,000.00 2,875.00 0.00

0.00 391.50 0.00 0.00 3,266.50 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS
3130AQF40
12/20/24 400,000.00 333.33 0.00

0.00 744.29 0.00 0.00 1,077.62 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133EMSK9
03/02/26 1,000,000.00 700.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133EMSU7
03/09/26 1,000,000.00 666.67 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 666.67 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133ENG20
08/15/24 1,200,000.00 3,300.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 (21.37) 0.00 3,278.63 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133ENG87
08/17/27 600,000.00 1,460.00 0.00

0.00 95.45 0.00 0.00 1,555.45 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP
3134GWWT9
09/30/25 1,000,000.00 458.33 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 458.33 0.00

0.00 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
3135G03U5
04/22/25 1,300,000.00 677.08 0.00

0.00 2,750.97 0.00 0.00 3,428.05 4,062.50

0.00 MARYLAND ST CMNTY DEV ADMIN DEPT HSG & CMNTY
DEV
57419RD28
09/01/26 1,000,000.00 2,385.83 0.00

0.00 0.00 (182.74) 0.00 2,203.10 0.00

0.00 Merrick Bank Corporation
59013KHV1
05/29/25 249,000.00 169.19 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169.19 163.73

0.00 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP
69371RR99
08/11/25 1,200,000.00 3,550.00 0.00

0.00 24.10 0.00 0.00 3,574.10 0.00

0.00 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
89236TGT6
02/13/25 900,000.00 1,350.00 0.00

0.00 1,269.92 0.00 0.00 2,619.92 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128282R0
08/15/27 575,000.00 1,089.84 0.00

0.00 669.43 0.00 0.00 1,759.28 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128283J7
11/30/24 1,215,000.00 2,186.83 0.00

0.00 0.00 (441.39) 0.00 1,745.45 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128286A3
01/31/26 750,000.00 1,658.46 0.00

0.00 758.81 0.00 0.00 2,417.27 0.00

0.00

Page 330 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 568 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
14 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Income
Description
Identifier
Final
Maturity
Current Units Interest Income Realized Gain
Realized Loss
Accretion
Income
Amortization
Expense
Misc
Income
Net Income Interest Received
Interest Due

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128286Z8
06/30/24 1,215,000.00 1,791.13 0.00

0.00 0.00 (132.19) 0.00 1,658.94 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828S92
07/31/23 1,180,000.00 1,242.53 0.00

0.00 109.49 0.00 0.00 1,352.02 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828T26
09/30/23 1,180,000.00 1,381.80 0.00

0.00 68.63 0.00 0.00 1,450.43 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828T91
10/31/23 1,180,000.00 1,616.15 0.00

0.00 0.00 (137.31) 0.00 1,478.84 9,587.50

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828X70
04/30/24 1,215,000.00 2,048.11 0.00

0.00 0.00 (406.64) 0.00 1,641.47 12,150.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y79
07/31/25 475,000.00 1,150.39 0.00

0.00 399.99 0.00 0.00 1,550.38 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y87
07/31/24 1,215,000.00 1,791.13 0.00

0.00 0.00 (124.26) 0.00 1,666.87 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y95
07/31/26 1,255,000.00 1,982.25 0.00

0.00 0.00 (30.06) 0.00 1,952.20 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YG9
09/30/26 1,255,000.00 1,736.83 0.00

0.00 217.23 0.00 0.00 1,954.06 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YM6
10/31/24 1,215,000.00 1,536.08 0.00

0.00 174.15 0.00 0.00 1,710.23 9,112.50

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YV6
11/30/24 1,215,000.00 1,543.65 0.00

0.00 190.83 0.00 0.00 1,734.48 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CDR9
12/31/23 1,180,000.00 745.52 0.00

0.00 759.97 0.00 0.00 1,505.48 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CDV0
01/31/24 1,180,000.00 869.77 0.00

0.00 643.62 0.00 0.00 1,513.38 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CEF4
03/31/27 1,850,000.00 3,938.87 0.00

0.00 1,851.04 0.00 0.00 5,789.91 0.00

0.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CEN7
04/30/27 1,675,000.00 3,882.34 0.00

0.00 389.79 0.00 0.00 4,272.13 23,031.25

0.00 Cash
CCYUSD
10/31/22 92,426.87 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 Portfolio T otal 05/03/25 35,116,426.87 $54,085.79 $0.00 $0.00 $12,219.45 ($1,550.76) $0.00 $64,754.47 $58,107.48 $0.00

Page 331 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 569 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
15 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
GASB 40
Issuer
Identifier
Security Type
% of Market Value
Book Yield
Market Yield
Duration S&P
Moody's
Effective Maturity
Final Maturity
Current Units Accrued Book Value
Book Value + Accrued
Market Value
Market Value + Accrued
Amazon.com, Inc.

Amazon.com, Inc.
023135AW6
CORP

3.02%

2.45%

4.34% 0.31 AA
A1
02/22/23
02/22/23 1,000,000.00 $4,600.00 $999,852.51
$1,004,452.51
$994,033.73
$998,633.73
Amazon.com, Inc.

3.02%

2.45%

4.34% 0.31 AA
A1 1,000,000.00 $4,600.00 $999,852.51
$1,004,452.51
$994,033.73
$998,633.73
Apple Inc.

Apple Inc.
037833DN7
CORP

1.92%

3.26%

4.81% 3.62 AA+
Aaa
09/11/26
09/11/26 700,000.00 $1,993.06 $669,536.06
$671,529.11
$632,728.73
$634,721.79
Apple Inc.

1.92%

3.26%

4.81% 3.62 AA+
Aaa 700,000.00 $1,993.06 $669,536.06
$671,529.11
$632,728.73
$634,721.79
BMW Bank of North America
BMW Bank of North America
05580AXF6
CD

0.67%

0.50%

4.73% 2.82 A
Aa3
09/25/25
09/25/25 250,000.00 $126.71 $250,000.00
$250,126.71
$221,577.75
$221,704.46
BMW Bank of North America

0.67%

0.50%

4.73% 2.82 A
Aa3 250,000.00 $126.71 $250,000.00
$250,126.71
$221,577.75
$221,704.46
Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation
Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation
14913R2H9
CORP

2.69%

0.71%

4.92% 2.92 A
A2
11/13/25
11/13/25 1,000,000.00 $3,733.33 $1,002,673.83
$1,006,407.16
$885,157.64
$888,890.97
Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation 2.69%

0.71%

4.92% 2.92 A
A2 1,000,000.00 $3,733.33 $1,002,673.83
$1,006,407.16
$885,157.64
$888,890.97
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation
3133ENG20
GSE

3.57%

3.28%

4.60% 1.70 AA+
Aaa
08/15/24
08/15/24 1,200,000.00 $8,360.00 $1,200,450.22
$1,208,810.22
$1,173,433.02
$1,181,793.02
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation
3133EMSK9
GSE

2.67%

0.84%

4.71% 3.21 AA+
Aaa
03/02/26
03/02/26 1,000,000.00 1,376.67 1,000,000.00
1,001,376.67
881,829.39
883,206.06
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation
3133EMSU7
GSE

2.67%

0.80%

4.71% 3.23 AA+
Aaa
03/09/26
03/09/26 1,000,000.00 1,155.56 1,000,000.00
1,001,155.56
880,061.03
881,216.59

Page 332 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 570 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
16 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
GASB 40
Issuer
Identifier
Security Type
% of Market Value
Book Yield
Market Yield
Duration S&P
Moody's
Effective Maturity
Final Maturity
Current Units Accrued Book Value
Book Value + Accrued
Market Value
Market Value + Accrued
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation
3133ENG87
GSE

1.71%

3.12%

4.38% 4.37 AA+
Aaa
08/17/27
08/17/27 600,000.00 3,601.33 594,611.84
598,213.18
562,562.21
566,163.54
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corporation 10.62%

1.96%

4.62% 2.89 AA+
Aaa 3,800,000.00 $14,493.56 $3,795,062.06
$3,809,555.62
$3,497,885.65
$3,512,379.20
Federal Home Loan Banks
Federal Home Loan Banks
3130A2UW4
GSE

3.53%

3.28%

4.71% 1.78 AA+
Aaa
09/13/24
09/13/24 1,200,000.00 $4,600.00 $1,191,386.96
$1,195,986.96
$1,161,072.00
$1,165,672.00
Federal Home Loan Banks
3130AQF40
GSE

1.13%

3.30%

4.65% 2.06 AA+
Aaa
12/20/24
12/20/24 400,000.00 1,455.56 381,272.69
382,728.25
370,597.76
372,053.32
Federal Home Loan Banks

4.65%

3.28%

4.70% 1.85 AA+
Aaa 1,600,000.00 $6,055.56 $1,572,659.65
$1,578,715.21
$1,531,669.76
$1,537,725.32
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation
3134GWWT9
GSE

2.69%

0.55%

4.73% 2.82 AA+
Aaa
09/30/25
09/30/25 1,000,000.00 $473.61 $1,000,000.00
$1,000,473.61
$887,467.87
$887,941.48
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation 2.69%

0.55%

4.73% 2.82 AA+
Aaa 1,000,000.00 $473.61 $1,000,000.00
$1,000,473.61
$887,467.87
$887,941.48
Federal National Mortgage
Association
Federal National Mortgage
Association
3135G03U5
GSE

3.57%

3.25%

4.62% 2.40 AA+
Aaa
04/22/25
04/22/25 1,300,000.00 $203.12 $1,219,867.01
$1,220,070.13
$1,179,812.49
$1,180,015.62
Federal National Mortgage
Association 3.57%

3.25%

4.62% 2.40 AA+
Aaa 1,300,000.00 $203.12 $1,219,867.01
$1,220,070.13
$1,179,812.49
$1,180,015.62
Maryland Department of Housing
and Community Development
Maryland Department of Housing
and Community Development
57419RD28
MUNI

2.80%

2.64%

5.14% 3.53 NA
Aa1
09/01/26
09/01/26 1,000,000.00 $4,771.67 $1,006,101.02
$1,010,872.69
$921,520.00
$926,291.67
Maryland Department of Housing
and Community Development 2.80%

2.64%

5.14% 3.53 NA
Aa1 1,000,000.00 $4,771.67 $1,006,101.02
$1,010,872.69
$921,520.00
$926,291.67

Page 333 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 571 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
17 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
GASB 40
Issuer
Identifier
Security Type
% of Market Value
Book Yield
Market Yield
Duration S&P
Moody's
Effective Maturity
Final Maturity
Current Units Accrued Book Value
Book Value + Accrued
Market Value
Market Value + Accrued
Merrick Bank Corporation
Merrick Bank Corporation
59013KHV1
CD

0.68%

0.80%

4.74% 2.54 NA
NA
05/29/25
05/29/25 249,000.00 $16.37 $249,000.00
$249,016.37
$225,263.08
$225,279.45
Merrick Bank Corporation

0.68%

0.80%

4.74% 2.54 NA
NA 249,000.00 $16.37 $249,000.00
$249,016.37
$225,263.08
$225,279.45
PACCAR Financial Corp.

PACCAR Financial Corp.
69371RR99
CORP

3.54%

3.58%

4.84% 2.58 A+
A1
08/11/25
08/11/25 1,200,000.00 $9,466.67 $1,199,211.74
$1,208,678.41
$1,160,125.25
$1,169,591.91
PACCAR Financial Corp.

3.54%

3.58%

4.84% 2.58 A+
A1 1,200,000.00 $9,466.67 $1,199,211.74
$1,208,678.41
$1,160,125.25
$1,169,591.91
T oyota Motor Credit
Corporation
Toyota Motor Credit
Corporation
89236TGT6
CORP

2.55%

3.56%

5.01% 2.18 A+
A1
02/13/25
02/13/25 900,000.00 $3,510.00 $865,794.08
$869,304.08
$838,365.85
$841,875.85
T oyota Motor Credit
Corporation 2.55%

3.56%

5.01% 2.18 A+
A1 900,000.00 $3,510.00 $865,794.08
$869,304.08
$838,365.85
$841,875.85

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CCYUSD
CASH

0.28%

0.00%

0.00% 0.00 AAA
Aaa
10/31/22
10/31/22 92,426.87 $0.00 $92,426.87
$92,426.87
$92,426.87
$92,426.87

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0.28%

0.00%

0.00% 0.00 AAA
Aaa 92,426.87 $0.00 $92,426.87
$92,426.87
$92,426.87
$92,426.87
United States Department of
The Treasury
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828S92
US GOV

3.49%

1.36%

4.67% 0.73 AA+
Aaa
07/31/23
07/31/23 1,180,000.00 $3,727.58 $1,179,039.27
$1,182,766.85
$1,150,592.04
$1,154,319.62
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828T26
US GOV

3.47%

1.44%

4.59% 0.89 AA+
Aaa
09/30/23
09/30/23 1,180,000.00 1,426.37 1,179,262.82
1,180,689.19
1,146,397.14
1,147,823.51
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828T91
US GOV

3.46%

1.49%

4.67% 0.97 AA+
Aaa
10/31/23
10/31/23 1,180,000.00 52.97 1,181,612.23
1,181,665.20
1,145,245.46
1,145,298.43

Page 334 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 572 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
18 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
GASB 40
Issuer
Identifier
Security Type
% of Market Value
Book Yield
Market Yield
Duration S&P
Moody's
Effective Maturity
Final Maturity
Current Units Accrued Book Value
Book Value + Accrued
Market Value
Market Value + Accrued
United States Department of
The Treasury
91282CDR9
US GOV

3.42%

1.52%

4.69% 1.13 AA+
Aaa
12/31/23
12/31/23 1,180,000.00 2,982.07 1,169,581.11
1,172,563.17
1,127,775.56
1,130,757.63
United States Department of
The Treasury
91282CDV0
US GOV

3.41%

1.53%

4.71% 1.21 AA+
Aaa
01/31/24
01/31/24 1,180,000.00 2,609.31 1,170,532.63
1,173,141.94
1,125,701.12
1,128,310.43
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828X70
US GOV

3.53%

1.60%

4.69% 1.45 AA+
Aaa
04/30/24
04/30/24 1,215,000.00 67.13 1,222,162.07
1,222,229.20
1,168,250.44
1,168,317.57
United States Department of
The Treasury
9128286Z8
US GOV

3.53%

1.62%

4.64% 1.60 AA+
Aaa
06/30/24
06/30/24 1,215,000.00 7,164.54 1,217,588.42
1,224,752.96
1,159,281.32
1,166,445.85
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828Y87
US GOV

3.51%

1.63%

4.63% 1.68 AA+
Aaa
07/31/24
07/31/24 1,215,000.00 5,373.40 1,217,557.44
1,222,930.84
1,156,717.66
1,162,091.07
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828YM6
US GOV

3.46%

1.67%

4.53% 1.93 AA+
Aaa
10/31/24
10/31/24 1,215,000.00 50.35 1,210,898.99
1,210,949.33
1,145,279.66
1,145,330.00
United States Department of
The Treasury
9128283J7
US GOV

3.53%

1.69%

4.57% 1.98 AA+
Aaa
11/30/24
11/30/24 1,215,000.00 10,863.63 1,225,821.10
1,236,684.72
1,156,717.66
1,167,581.29
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828YV6
US GOV

3.48%

1.69%

4.54% 2.00 AA+
Aaa
11/30/24
11/30/24 1,215,000.00 7,668.44 1,210,321.57
1,217,990.02
1,142,479.08
1,150,147.52
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828Y79
US GOV

1.39%

3.93%

4.47% 2.59 AA+
Aaa
07/31/25
07/31/25 475,000.00 3,451.17 462,058.32
465,509.49
455,573.45
459,024.62
United States Department of
The Treasury
9128286A3
US GOV

2.16%

3.91%

4.45% 3.04 AA+
Aaa
01/31/26
01/31/26 750,000.00 4,975.37 720,944.99
725,920.37
709,014.00
713,989.37
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828Y95
US GOV

3.49%

1.85%

4.39% 3.54 AA+
Aaa
07/31/26
07/31/26 1,255,000.00 5,946.76 1,256,326.36
1,262,273.12
1,147,000.98
1,152,947.73
United States Department of
The Treasury
912828YG9
US GOV

3.43%

1.84%

4.34% 3.72 AA+
Aaa
09/30/26
09/30/26 1,255,000.00 1,792.86 1,244,986.26
1,246,779.12
1,133,568.71
1,135,361.57
United States Department of
The Treasury
91282CEF4
US GOV

5.20%

3.79%

4.32% 4.10 AA+
Aaa
03/31/27
03/31/27 1,850,000.00 4,065.93 1,753,805.57
1,757,871.51
1,715,947.15
1,720,013.08
United States Department of
The Treasury
91282CEN7
US GOV

4.75%

3.05%

4.31% 4.16 AA+
Aaa
04/30/27
04/30/27 1,675,000.00 127.24 1,654,366.37
1,654,493.62
1,569,069.65
1,569,196.89

Page 335 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 573 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
19 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
GASB 40
Issuer
Identifier
Security Type
% of Market Value
Book Yield
Market Yield
Duration S&P
Moody's
Effective Maturity
Final Maturity
Current Units Accrued Book Value
Book Value + Accrued
Market Value
Market Value + Accrued
United States Department of
The Treasury
9128282R0
US GOV

1.60%

3.76%

4.29% 4.44 AA+
Aaa
08/15/27
08/15/27 575,000.00 2,742.19 537,252.57
539,994.76
524,620.22
527,362.41
United States Department of
The Treasury 60.32%

2.10%

4.53% 2.28 AA+
Aaa 21,025,000.00 $65,087.31 $20,814,118.09
$20,879,205.39
$19,879,231.30
$19,944,318.61
Portfolio T otal
100.00%

2.20%

4.60% 2.37 AA
Aa1
05/03/25
05/03/25 35,116,426.87 $114,530.96 $34,736,302.91
$34,850,833.87
$32,947,265.97
$33,061,796.93

Page 336 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 574 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
20 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Portfolio Activity Summary
Description
Identifier
Security Type
Final Maturity
Beginning Original Cost
Beginning Market Value
Beginning Book Value
Purchases
Purchased Accrued
Sales
Disposed Accrued
Maturities
Paydowns
Interest Received
Transfers
Realized Gain/Loss
Unrealized Gain/Loss
Ending Original Cost
Ending Market Value
Ending Book Value
Cash
CCYUSD
CASH
10/31/22
$38,381.89
$38,381.89
$38,381.89
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
($4,062.50)
$0.00
$0.00
$92,426.87
$92,426.87
$92,426.87
Merrick Bank Corporation
59013KHV1
CD
05/29/25
249,000.00
226,904.74
226,904.74

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
163.73

0.00 0.00
(23,736.92)
249,000.00
225,263.08
249,000.00
BMW Bank of North America
05580AXF6
CD
09/25/25
250,000.00
223,298.75
223,298.75

0.00 0.00

0.00 (28,422.25)
250,000.00
221,577.75
250,000.00
AMAZON.COM INC
023135AW6
CORP
02/22/23
998,140.00
991,983.02
991,983.02

0.00 0.00

0.00 (5,818.78)
998,140.00
994,033.73
999,852.51

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT
CORP
89236TGT6
CORP
02/13/25
862,353.00
840,107.01
840,107.01

0.00 0.00

0.00 (27,428.23)
862,353.00
838,365.85
865,794.08

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP
69371RR99
CORP
08/11/25
1,199,148.00
1,165,170.23
1,165,170.23

0.00 0.00

0.00 (39,086.50)
1,199,148.00
1,160,125.25
1,199,211.74

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL

SERVICES CORP
14913R2H9
CORP
11/13/25
1,004,240.00
886,204.63
886,204.63

0.00 0.00

0.00 (117,516.19)
1,004,240.00
885,157.64
1,002,673.83

APPLE INC
037833DN7
CORP
09/11/26
667,786.00
636,908.84
636,908.84

0.00 0.00

0.00 (36,807.32)
667,786.00
632,728.73
669,536.06

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT

BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133ENG20
GSE
08/15/24
1,200,504.00
1,178,968.66
1,178,968.66

0.00 0.00

0.00 (27,017.20)
1,200,504.00
1,173,433.02
1,200,450.22

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS
3130A2UW4
GSE
09/13/24
1,190,364.00
1,167,090.40
1,167,090.40

0.00 0.00

0.00 (30,314.96)
1,190,364.00
1,161,072.00
1,191,386.96

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS
3130AQF40
GSE
12/20/24
379,496.00
371,903.87
371,903.87

0.00 0.00

0.00 (10,674.93)
379,496.00
370,597.76
381,272.69

FEDERAL NATIONAL

MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
3135G03U5
GSE
04/22/25
1,212,679.00
1,184,827.64
1,184,827.64

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
4,062.50

0.00 0.00
(40,054.52)
1,212,679.00
1,179,812.49
1,219,867.01

FEDERAL HOME LOAN

MORTGAGE CORP
3134GWWT9
GSE
09/30/25
1,000,000.00
889,761.66
889,761.66

0.00 0.00

0.00 (112,532.13)
1,000,000.00
887,467.87
1,000,000.00

Page 337 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 575 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
21 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Portfolio Activity Summary
Description
Identifier
Security Type
Final Maturity
Beginning Original Cost
Beginning Market Value
Beginning Book Value
Purchases
Purchased Accrued
Sales
Disposed Accrued
Maturities
Paydowns
Interest Received
Transfers
Realized Gain/Loss
Unrealized Gain/Loss
Ending Original Cost
Ending Market Value
Ending Book Value

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT

BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133EMSK9
GSE
03/02/26
1,000,000.00
885,720.65
885,720.65

0.00 0.00

0.00 (118,170.61)
1,000,000.00
881,829.39
1,000,000.00

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT

BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133EMSU7
GSE
03/09/26
1,000,000.00
883,948.13
883,948.13

0.00 0.00

0.00 (119,938.97)
1,000,000.00
880,061.03
1,000,000.00

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT

BANKS FUNDING CORP
3133ENG87
GSE
08/17/27
594,384.00
568,285.06
568,285.06

0.00 0.00

0.00 (32,049.63)
594,384.00
562,562.21
594,611.84

MARYLAND ST CMNTY DEV

ADMIN DEPT HSG & CMNTY
DEV
57419RD28
MUNI
09/01/26
1,019,370.00
928,060.00
928,060.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 (84,581.02)
1,019,370.00
921,520.00
1,006,101.02

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828S92
US GOV
07/31/23
1,178,156.25
1,151,467.60
1,151,467.60

0.00 0.00

0.00 (28,447.23)
1,178,156.25
1,150,592.04
1,179,039.27

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828T26
US GOV
09/30/23
1,178,709.37
1,146,582.40
1,146,582.40

0.00 0.00

0.00 (32,865.68)
1,178,709.37
1,146,397.14
1,179,262.82

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828T91
US GOV
10/31/23
1,182,719.53
1,146,720.46
1,146,720.46

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
9,587.50

0.00 0.00
(36,366.77)
1,182,719.53
1,145,245.46
1,181,612.23

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CDR9
US GOV
12/31/23
1,163,452.34
1,129,850.00
1,129,850.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 (41,805.55)
1,163,452.34
1,127,775.56
1,169,581.11

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CDV0
US GOV
01/31/24
1,165,342.19
1,127,545.46
1,127,545.46

0.00 0.00

0.00 (44,831.51)
1,165,342.19
1,125,701.12
1,170,532.63

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828X70
US GOV
04/30/24
1,225,441.40
1,172,238.08
1,172,238.08

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
12,150.00

0.00 0.00
(53,911.62)
1,225,441.40
1,168,250.44
1,222,162.07

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128286Z8
US GOV
06/30/24
1,218,654.49
1,163,552.04
1,163,552.04

0.00 0.00

0.00 (58,307.11)
1,218,654.49
1,159,281.32
1,217,588.42

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y87
US GOV
07/31/24
1,218,559.57
1,161,606.82
1,161,606.82

0.00 0.00

0.00 (60,839.77)
1,218,559.57
1,156,717.66
1,217,557.44

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YM6
US GOV
10/31/24
1,209,494.53
1,149,266.07
1,149,266.07

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
9,112.50

0.00 0.00
(65,619.33)
1,209,494.53
1,145,279.66
1,210,898.99

Page 338 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 576 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
22 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
Portfolio Activity Summary
Description
Identifier
Security Type
Final Maturity
Beginning Original Cost
Beginning Market Value
Beginning Book Value
Purchases
Purchased Accrued
Sales
Disposed Accrued
Maturities
Paydowns
Interest Received
Transfers
Realized Gain/Loss
Unrealized Gain/Loss
Ending Original Cost
Ending Market Value
Ending Book Value

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128283J7
US GOV
11/30/24
1,229,380.67
1,161,748.98
1,161,748.98

0.00 0.00

0.00 (69,103.43)
1,229,380.67
1,156,717.66
1,225,821.10

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YV6
US GOV
11/30/24
1,208,782.62
1,146,608.86
1,146,608.86

0.00 0.00

0.00 (67,842.49)
1,208,782.62
1,142,479.08
1,210,321.57

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y79
US GOV
07/31/25
461,529.30
457,725.68
457,725.68

0.00 0.00

0.00 (6,484.87)
461,529.30
455,573.45
462,058.32

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128286A3
US GOV
01/31/26
719,941.41
712,939.50
712,939.50

0.00 0.00

0.00 (11,930.99)
719,941.41
709,014.00
720,944.99

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828Y95
US GOV
07/31/26
1,256,568.75
1,154,060.35
1,154,060.35

0.00 0.00

0.00 (109,325.38)
1,256,568.75
1,147,000.98
1,256,326.36

UNITED STATES TREASURY
912828YG9
US GOV
09/30/26
1,243,234.38
1,140,039.49
1,140,039.49

0.00 0.00

0.00 (111,417.55)
1,243,234.38
1,133,568.71
1,244,986.26

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CEF4
US GOV
03/31/27
1,751,357.42
1,729,244.95
1,729,244.95

0.00 0.00

0.00 (37,858.42)
1,751,357.42
1,715,947.15
1,753,805.57

UNITED STATES TREASURY
91282CEN7
US GOV
04/30/27
1,653,473.63
1,581,632.15
1,581,632.15

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
23,031.25

0.00 0.00
(85,296.72)
1,653,473.63
1,569,069.65
1,654,366.37

UNITED STATES TREASURY
9128282R0
US GOV
08/15/27
536,367.19
528,955.15
528,955.15

0.00 0.00

0.00 (12,632.35)
536,367.19
524,620.22
537,252.57
Portfolio T otal
$34,667,010.94
$33,029,309.20
$34,671,589.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$58,107.48
($4,062.50)
$0.00
($1,789,036.94)
$34,721,055.92
$32,947,265.97
$34,736,302.91

Page 339 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 577 of 1916 ends

Public Trust Advisors
23 10/01/2022 to 10/31/2022
City of Hemet 1-5
This information is for the sole purposes of the client and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations. Please review the contents of this information carefully. Should you have any questions regarding the information presented, calculation methodology, investment portfolio, security detail, or any other facet of this information, please feel free to contact us.

Public Trust Advisors, LLC (Public Trust) statements and reports are intended to detail our investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any client accounts managed by Public Trust. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes and settles all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings transactions. Public Trust recognizes that clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping; therefore, it is recommended that the client reconcile this information with their custodian bank statement. Many custodians use a settlement date basis that may result in the need to reconcile due to a timing difference. The underlying market value, amortized cost, and accrued interest may differ between the custodian and this statement or report. This can be attributable to differences in calculation methodologies and pricing sources used. Please contact your relationship manager or call us at (855) 395-3954 with questions regarding your account.

Public Trust does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian. Our clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies, implementing and enforcing internal controls, and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions. The total market value represents prices obtained from various sources; it may be impacted by the frequency at which prices are reported, and such prices are not guaranteed. Prices received from pricing vendors are generally based on current market quotes but when such quotes are not available, the pricing vendors use a variety of techniques to estimate value. These estimates, particularly for fixed-income securities, may be based on certain minimum principal amounts (e.g. $1 million) and may not reflect all the factors that affect the value of the security including liquidity risk. The prices provided are not firm bids or offers. Certain securities may reflect N/A or unavailable where the price for such security is generally not available from a pricing source. The market value of a security, including those priced at par value, may differ from its purchase price and may not closely reflect the value at which the security may be sold or purchased based on various market factors. The securities in this investment portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not guaranteed or otherwise protected by Public Trust, the FDIC (except for certain non-negotiable certificates of deposit), or any government agency unless specifically stated otherwise.

Clients may be permitted to establish one or more unmanaged accounts for the purposes of client reporting. Public Trust defines an unmanaged account as one where the investment direction remains the sole responsibility of the client rather than the Investment Manager. These accounts do not receive ongoing supervision and monitoring services. The Investment Manager does not make any investment recommendations and may not charge a fee for reporting on these accounts. The primary purpose for this service is to include unmanaged accounts owned by the client in the performance reports provided by the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager assumes no liability for the underlying performance of any unmanaged accounts or assets, and it is the client’s sole responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of any such performance.

Beginning and ending balances are based on market value plus accrued interest on a trade date basis. Statements and reports made available to the end user either from Public Trust or through the online reporting platform may present information and portfolio analytics using various optional methods including, but not limited to, historical cost, amortized cost, and market value. All information is assumed to be correct, but the accuracy has not been confirmed and therefore is not guaranteed to be correct. Information is obtained from third party sources that may or may not be verified. The data in this report is unaudited and is only applicable for the date denoted on the report. Market values may change day-to-day based on numerous circumstances such as trading volume, news released about the underlying issuer, issuer performance, etc. Underlying market values may be priced via numerous aspects as certain securities are short term in nature and not readily traded. Performance results are shown net of all fees and expenses and reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings.

Many factors affect performance including changes in market conditions and interest rates and in response to other economic, political, or financial developments. Investment involves risk including the possible loss of principal.

No assurance can be given that the performance objectives of a given strategy will be achieved. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any financial and/or investment decision may incur losses.

The investment advisor providing these services is Public Trust Advisors, LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.

Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Public Trust is required to maintain a written disclosure brochure of our background and business experience. If you would like to receive a copy of our current disclosure brochure, Privacy Policy, or Code of Ethics, please contact us.

Disclaimers
Disclaimers

Page 340 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 578 of 1916 ends

Contact
Regional Office
550 S. Hope Street, Suite 560
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Headquarters
717 17th Street, Suite 1850
Denver, CO 80202

Page 341 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 579 of 1916 ends

Current Period Year-to-Date
Go Paperless.

Securely access your accounts online to view your statements. Ask your BNY Mellon contact how we can help you access your account balances and activity in real time, receive your reports, enter your own transactions or submit an audit confirmation online. Also be sure to ask how NEXEN(SM) Gateway, our new cloud-based ecosystem, can help you.

Visit us at www.bnymellon.com
CLIENT SERVICE MANAGER:

Percent of all
Investments Asset Classification Market Value 100% TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS 53,469,477 .14
Estimated Market
Asset Classification Market Value Cost Accrued Income Annual Income Yield ACCOUNT TOTALS 53,469,477 .14 55,070,851 .35 282,255 .04 1,177,333 .25 2.20 % Realized
Transaction Category Income Principal Gains/Losses Income Principal OPENING BALANCE 261,278.76 - 261,278.76 8,454.48 8,454.48 - Account Statement
Account Overview
Summary of Assets Held by Asset Classification
Summary of Cash Transactions by Transaction Category
Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Account 510099 Base Currency = USD

CITY OF HEMET
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256
94% FIXED INCOME 49,747,892 .40
6% CASH AND SHORT TERM 3,721,584.74
FIXED INCOME 49,747,892 .40 51,275,275 .75 273,413 .70 1,110,693 .75 2.23 % CASH AND SHORT TERM 3,721,584 .74 3,795,575 .60 8,841.34 66,639.50 1.79 % INTEREST 103,421.32 0.00 0.00 662,288.23 0.00 MUNICIPAL BOND INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,749.60 0.00 SALES AND REDEMPTIONS 0.00 743,000.00 0.00 41,388.61 82,697,871 .47

Page 1 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,002

Page 342 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 580 of 1916 ends

Current Period Year-to-Date
Realized
Transaction Category Income Principal Gains/Losses Income Principal CLOSING BALANCE 210,185.01 - 261,278.76 0.00 210,185.01 - 261,278.76 Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Summary of Cash Transactions by Transaction Category - Continued OTHER CASH ADDITIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59,166,666 .67 OTHER CASH DISBURSEMENTS 52,327.57 - 0.00 0.00 662,944.08 - 3,209,380 .44 - PURCHASES 0.00 743,000.00 - 0.00 311,121.85 - 138,385,424 .46 - The above cash transactions summary is provided for information purposes only and may not reflect actual taxable income or deductible expenses as reportable under the Internal Revenue Code.

Account 510099 Base Currency = USD

CITY OF HEMET

Page 2 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,003

Page 343 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 581 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
750,000.000 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 99.65600 747,420.00 749,625.00 99.95000 6,187.50 20,250.00 2.71% CUSIP: 89236TEL5
MATURITY DATE: 01/11/2023
RATE: 2.700%
MOODY'S A1
S&P A+
1,000,000.000 APPLE INC 98.88600 988,860.00 990,600.00 99.06000 11,866.67 24,000.00 2.43% CUSIP: 037833AK6
MATURITY DATE: 05/03/2023
RATE: 2.400%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,000,000.000 MICROSOFT CORP 98.16600 981,660.00 970,750.00 97.07500 4,611.11 20,000.00 2.04% CUSIP: 594918BQ6
MATURITY DATE: 08/08/2023
RATE: 2.000%
MOODY'S Aaa

S&P AAA
2,070,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 97.05500 2,009,038.50 2,074,770.70 100.23047 92.92 33,637.50 1.67% CUSIP: 912828T91
MATURITY DATE: 10/31/2023
RATE: 1.625%
MOODY'S Aaa
2,070,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.66000 1,980,162.00 2,033,694.14 98.24609 4,354.92 10,350.00 0.52% CUSIP: 91282CDM0
MATURITY DATE: 11/30/2023
RATE: 0.500%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,100,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 98.49300 1,083,423.00 1,100,121.00 100.01100 14,746.88 37,125.00 3.43% CUSIP: 3130A0F70
MATURITY DATE: 12/08/2023
RATE: 3.375%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
2,070,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.57400 1,978,381.80 2,040,971.49 98.59766 5,231.25 15,525.00 0.78% CUSIP: 91282CDR9
MATURITY DATE: 12/31/2023
RATE: 0.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
2,070,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.39800 1,974,738.60 2,044,286.72 98.75781 4,577.34 18,112.50 0.92% CUSIP: 91282CDV0
MATURITY DATE: 01/31/2024
RATE: 0.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,000,000.000 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 98.76000 987,600.00 1,034,730.00 103.47300 9,687.50 38,750.00 3.92% CUSIP: 46625HJT8
MATURITY DATE: 02/01/2024
RATE: 3.875%
MOODY'S A1

FIXED INCOME

Page 3 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,004

Page 344 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 582 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
S&P A-
1,800,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 98.01800 1,764,324.00 1,796,634.00 99.81300 8,612.50 58,500.00 3.32% CUSIP: 3130A0XE5
MATURITY DATE: 03/08/2024
RATE: 3.250%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
2,010,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 96.15200 1,932,655.20 2,027,273.44 100.85938 111.05 40,200.00 2.08% CUSIP: 912828X70
MATURITY DATE: 04/30/2024
RATE: 2.000%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,100,000.000 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP 96.98900 1,066,879.00 1,088,054.00 98.91400 14,281.67 31,350.00 2.94% CUSIP: 14913Q2V0
MATURITY DATE: 05/17/2024
RATE: 2.850%
MOODY'S A2
S&P A
2,010,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.97700 1,929,137.70 2,027,666.02 100.87891 16,914.75 40,200.00 2.08% CUSIP: 912828XT2
MATURITY DATE: 05/31/2024
RATE: 2.000%
MOODY'S Aaa
500,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 96.79400 483,970.00 495,280.00 99.05600 5,385.42 13,750.00 2.84% CUSIP: 3130ASDS5
MATURITY DATE: 06/28/2024
RATE: 2.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
2,010,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.41400 1,917,821.40 2,016,045.71 100.30078 11,852.45 35,175.00 1.83% CUSIP: 9128286Z8
MATURITY DATE: 06/30/2024
RATE: 1.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,550,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 97.37900 1,509,374.50 1,523,419.92 98.28516 15,668.48 46,500.00 3.08% CUSIP: 91282CEX5
MATURITY DATE: 06/30/2024
RATE: 3.000%
MOODY'S Aaa
2,010,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.20300 1,913,580.30 2,015,888.67 100.29297 8,889.33 35,175.00 1.84% CUSIP: 912828Y87
MATURITY DATE: 07/31/2024
RATE: 1.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,900,000.000 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP 97.78600 1,857,934.00 1,900,798.00 100.04200 13,236.67 62,700.00 3.37% CUSIP: 3133ENG20
MATURITY DATE: 08/15/2024
RATE: 3.300%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+

Page 4 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,005

Page 345 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 583 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
505,000.000 WALT DISNEY CO/THE 94.33000 476,366.50 501,970.00 99.40000 1,546.56 8,837.50 1.86% CUSIP: 254687FK7
MATURITY DATE: 08/30/2024
RATE: 1.750%
MOODY'S A2
S&P BBB+
1,900,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 96.75600 1,838,364.00 1,884,743.00 99.19700 7,283.33 54,625.00 2.97% CUSIP: 3130A2UW4
MATURITY DATE: 09/13/2024
RATE: 2.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,890,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 94.26200 1,781,551.80 1,881,435.94 99.54688 78.31 28,350.00 1.59% CUSIP: 912828YM6
MATURITY DATE: 10/31/2024
RATE: 1.500%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,890,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.20300 1,799,336.70 1,912,369.92 101.18359 16,898.98 40,162.50 2.23% CUSIP: 9128283J7
MATURITY DATE: 11/30/2024
RATE: 2.125%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,890,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 94.03100 1,777,185.90 1,880,328.51 99.48828 11,928.69 28,350.00 1.60% CUSIP: 912828YV6
MATURITY DATE: 11/30/2024
RATE: 1.500%
MOODY'S Aaa
2,000,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 92.64900 1,852,980.00 1,897,480.00 94.87400 7,277.78 20,000.00 1.08% CUSIP: 3130AQF40
MATURITY DATE: 12/20/2024
RATE: 1.000%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
600,000.000 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 93.15200 558,912.00 574,902.00 95.81700 2,340.00 10,800.00 1.93% CUSIP: 89236TGT6
MATURITY DATE: 02/13/2025
RATE: 1.800%
MOODY'S A1
S&P A+
2,300,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 96.18400 2,212,232.00 2,236,210.94 97.22656 10,832.87 63,250.00 2.86% CUSIP: 9128283Z1
MATURITY DATE: 02/28/2025
RATE: 2.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
2,300,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.44900 2,195,327.00 2,225,609.38 96.76563 2,819.71 60,375.00 2.75% CUSIP: 91282CEH0
MATURITY DATE: 04/15/2025
RATE: 2.625%
MOODY'S Aaa

Page 5 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,006

Page 346 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 584 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
2,000,000.000 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 90.75500 1,815,100.00 1,865,660.00 93.28300 312.50 12,500.00 0.69% CUSIP: 3135G03U5
MATURITY DATE: 04/22/2025
RATE: 0.625%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,850,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 96.09000 1,777,665.00 1,830,705.08 98.95703 20,199.62 53,187.50 2.99% CUSIP: 91282CEU1
MATURITY DATE: 06/15/2025
RATE: 2.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
2,835,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.91000 2,719,048.50 2,754,601.17 97.16406 20,598.05 81,506.25 3.00% CUSIP: 912828Y79
MATURITY DATE: 07/31/2025
RATE: 2.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,900,000.000 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 96.67700 1,836,863.00 1,898,651.00 99.92900 14,988.89 67,450.00 3.67% CUSIP: 69371RR99
MATURITY DATE: 08/11/2025
RATE: 3.550%
MOODY'S A1
S&P A+
247,000.000 BANK HAPOALIM B M NEW YORK 06MAR24 97.12023 239,886.97 247,000.00 100.00000 1,155.82 7,533.50 3.14% CUSIP: 06251AW30
MATURITY DATE: 03/06/2024
RATE: 3.050%
249,000.000 BANK NEW ENG SALEM N H 20NOV23 96.58106 240,486.84 249,000.00 100.00000 190.67 5,353.50 2.23% CUSIP: 06426KBH0
MATURITY DATE: 11/20/2023
RATE: 2.150%
1,028,481.850 BNY MELLON CASH RESERVE 1.00000 1,028,481.85 1,028,481.85 1.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00% CUSIP: X9USDBMCR
247,000.000 FIRST BK HIGHLAND PK ILL 15NOV22 99.93175 246,831.42 247,000.00 100.00000 2,588.42 5,557.50 2.25% CUSIP: 319141JJ7
MATURITY DATE: 11/15/2022
RATE: 2.250%
249,000.000 INDUSTRIAL + COML BK CHINA 22DEC22 99.80567 248,516.12 249,000.00 100.00000 170.55 6,225.00 2.50% CUSIP: 45581EAP6
MATURITY DATE: 12/22/2022
RATE: 2.500%
247,000.000 JEFFERSON FINL FCU METAIRIE 19OCT23 98.06794 242,227.80 247,000.00 100.00000 294.71 8,274.50 3.42% CUSIP: 474067AQ8
MATURITY DATE: 10/19/2023
RATE: 3.350%
247,000.000 LIVE OAK BKG CO WILMINGTON 14FEB25 93.53288 231,026.22 247,000.00 100.00000 388.09 4,569.50 1.98% CUSIP: 538036HW7
MATURITY DATE: 02/14/2025
Total FIXED INCOME 49,747,892.40 51,275,275.75 273,413.70 1,110,693.75 2.23%

CASH AND SHORT TERM

Page 6 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,007

Page 347 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 585 of 1916 ends

Accrued Estimated Market
Shares/Par Value Asset Description Market Price Market Value Cost Average Cost Income Income Yield Realized
Transaction Date Transaction Description Income Principal Cost Gains/Losses Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Statement of Assets Held by Asset Classification - Continued Statement of Transactions by Transaction Date
Account 510099 Base Currency = USD

CITY OF HEMET
RATE: 1.850%
247,000.000 MORGAN STANLEY BK N A SALT 11JAN23 99.68571 246,223.72 247,000.00 100.00000 2,026.42 6,545.50 2.66% CUSIP: 61747MF63
MATURITY DATE: 01/11/2023
RATE: 2.650%
240,000.000 MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BK N 18APR24 96.53102 231,674.45 240,000.00 100.00000 253.15 6,600.00 2.85% CUSIP: 61760AZA0
MATURITY DATE: 04/18/2024
RATE: 2.750%
249,000.000 MOUNTAIN AMER FED CR UN WES 30NOV22 99.87955 248,700.09 249,000.00 100.00000 278.33 5,976.00 2.40% CUSIP: 62384RAD8
MATURITY DATE: 11/30/2022
RATE: 2.400%
245,000.000 STATE BK INDIA NEW YORK N Y 22JAN25 94.02183 230,353.49 245,000.00 100.00000 1,369.32 4,900.00 2.13% CUSIP: 856285SK8
MATURITY DATE: 01/22/2025
RATE: 2.000%
249,000.000 WASHINGTON FED BK N A SEATT 23AUG24 94.81205 236,082.02 249,000.00 100.00000 125.86 5,104.50 2.16% CUSIP: 938828BJ8
MATURITY DATE: 08/23/2024
RATE: 2.050%
CASH BALANCE 51,093.75 51,093.75 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00% Total Market Value Plus Total Accrued Income 53,751,732.18 10/03/22 Interest 375.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 LIVE OAK BKG CO WILMINGTON 14FEB25
RATE: 1.850% MATURITY: 02/14/25
TRADE DATE 10/01/22 SET/DATE 10/01/22
CUSIP 538036HW7
247,000.000 SHARES
10/03/22 Interest 73.45 0.00 0.00 0.00

BNY MELLON CASH RESERVE
TRADE DATE 10/03/22 SET/DATE 10/03/22
CUSIP X9USDBMCR
Total CASH AND SHORT TERM 3,721,584.74 3,795,575.60 8,841.34 66,639.50 1.79% ACCOUNT TOTALS 53,469,477.14 55,070,851.35 282,255.04 1,177,333.25 2.20% 10/01/22 ACCOUNT OPENING PERIOD BALANCE 261,278.76- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60

Page 7 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,008

Page 348 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 586 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
10/07/22 Cash Debit 449.03- 0.00 0.00 0.00 BNF: CITY OF HEMET NOTPROVIDED
DETAIL: WEEKLY INTEREST WIRE ATTN:

ACCOUNTI
DETAIL: NG MANAGER
A/C WITH: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
94104,CALIFORNIA,US
10/17/22 Interest 491.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOUNTAIN AMER FED CR UN WES 30NOV22
RATE: 2.400% MATURITY: 11/30/22
TRADE DATE 10/15/22 SET/DATE 10/15/22
CUSIP 62384RAD8
249,000.000 SHARES
10/17/22 Interest 30,187.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 2.625% MATURITY: 04/15/25
TRADE DATE 10/15/22 SET/DATE 10/15/22
CUSIP 91282CEH0
2,300,000.000 SHARES
10/18/22 Interest 3,309.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BK N 18APR24
RATE: 2.750% MATURITY: 04/18/24
TRADE DATE 10/18/22 SET/DATE 10/18/22
CUSIP 61760AZA0
240,000.000 SHARES
10/19/22 Interest 440.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 BANK NEW ENG SALEM N H 20NOV23
RATE: 2.150% MATURITY: 11/20/23
TRADE DATE 10/19/22 SET/DATE 10/19/22
CUSIP 06426KBH0
249,000.000 SHARES
10/19/22 Interest 4,148.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 JEFFERSON FINL FCU METAIRIE 19OCT23
RATE: 3.350% MATURITY: 10/19/23
TRADE DATE 10/19/22 SET/DATE 10/19/22
CUSIP 474067AQ8
247,000.000 SHARES
10/03/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 260,829.73- 261,278.76 55,268,757.60 0.00 10/07/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 261,278.76- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60 0.00 10/17/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 230,600.08- 261,278.76 55,268,757.60 0.00 10/18/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 227,291.04- 261,278.76 55,268,757.60 0.00

Page 8 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,009

Page 349 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 587 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
10/21/22 Cash Debit 38,576.31- 0.00 0.00 0.00 BNF: CITY OF HEMET NOTPROVIDED
DETAIL: WEEKLY INTEREST WIRE ATTN:

ACCOUNTI
DETAIL: NG MANAGER
A/C WITH: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
94104,CALIFORNIA,US
10/24/22 Purchase 0.00 249,000.00- 249,000.00 0.00

BNY MELLON CASH RESERVE
TRADE DATE 10/24/22 SET/DATE 10/24/22
CUSIP X9USDBMCR
249,000.000 SHARES
10/24/22 Redemption 0.00 249,000.00 249,000.00- 0.00 COMENITY CAP BK DRAPER UTAH 24OCT22
RATE: 2.300% MATURITY: 10/24/22
TRADE DATE 10/24/22 SET/DATE 10/24/22
CUSIP 20033AXS0
249,000.000 SHARES
10/24/22 Interest 486.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMENITY CAP BK DRAPER UTAH 24OCT22
RATE: 2.300% MATURITY: 10/24/22
TRADE DATE 10/24/22 SET/DATE 10/24/22
CUSIP 20033AXS0
249,000.000 SHARES
10/24/22 Interest 6,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
RATE: 0.625% MATURITY: 04/22/25
TRADE DATE 10/22/22 SET/DATE 10/22/22
CUSIP 3135G03U5
2,000,000.000 SHARES
10/24/22 Interest 511.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 INDUSTRIAL + COML BK CHINA 22DEC22
RATE: 2.500% MATURITY: 12/22/22
TRADE DATE 10/22/22 SET/DATE 10/22/22
CUSIP 45581EAP6
249,000.000 SHARES
10/24/22 Interest 419.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 WASHINGTON FED BK N A SEATT 23AUG24
RATE: 2.050% MATURITY: 08/23/24
TRADE DATE 10/23/22 SET/DATE 10/23/22
CUSIP 938828BJ8
249,000.000 SHARES
10/19/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 222,702.45- 261,278.76 55,268,757.60 0.00 10/21/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 261,278.76- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60 0.00

Page 9 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,010

Page 350 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 588 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
10/25/22 Purchase 0.00 247,000.00- 247,000.00 0.00

BNY MELLON CASH RESERVE
TRADE DATE 10/25/22 SET/DATE 10/25/22
CUSIP X9USDBMCR
247,000.000 SHARES
10/25/22 Redemption 0.00 247,000.00 247,000.00- 0.00 BARCLAYS B 25OCT22
RATE: 2.300% MATURITY: 10/25/22
TRADE DATE 10/25/22 SET/DATE 10/25/22
CUSIP 06740KLJ4
247,000.000 SHARES
10/25/22 Interest 2,848.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 BARCLAYS B 25OCT22
RATE: 2.300% MATURITY: 10/25/22
TRADE DATE 10/25/22 SET/DATE 10/25/22
CUSIP 06740KLJ4
247,000.000 SHARES
10/27/22 Purchase 0.00 247,000.00- 247,000.00 0.00

BNY MELLON CASH RESERVE
TRADE DATE 10/27/22 SET/DATE 10/27/22
CUSIP X9USDBMCR
247,000.000 SHARES
10/27/22 Redemption 0.00 247,000.00 247,000.00- 0.00 ALLIANCE CR UN FENTON MO 27OCT22
RATE: 2.250% MATURITY: 10/27/22
TRADE DATE 10/27/22 SET/DATE 10/27/22
CUSIP 01859BAB1
247,000.000 SHARES
10/27/22 Interest 2,786.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 ALLIANCE CR UN FENTON MO 27OCT22
RATE: 2.250% MATURITY: 10/27/22
TRADE DATE 10/27/22 SET/DATE 10/27/22
CUSIP 01859BAB1
247,000.000 SHARES
10/28/22 Cash Debit 13,302.23- 0.00 0.00 0.00 BNF: CITY OF HEMET NOTPROVIDED
DETAIL: WEEKLY INTEREST WIRE ATTN:

ACCOUNTI
DETAIL: NG MANAGER
A/C WITH: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
10/24/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 253,611.17- 261,278.76 55,268,757.60 0.00 10/25/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 250,762.89- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60 0.00 10/27/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 247,976.53- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60 0.00

Page 10 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,011

Page 351 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 589 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
94104,CALIFORNIA,US
10/31/22 Interest 16,818.75 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 1.625% MATURITY: 10/31/23
TRADE DATE 10/31/22 SET/DATE 10/31/22
CUSIP 912828T91
2,070,000.000 SHARES
10/31/22 Interest 20,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 2.000% MATURITY: 04/30/24
TRADE DATE 10/31/22 SET/DATE 10/31/22
CUSIP 912828X70
2,010,000.000 SHARES
10/31/22 Interest 14,175.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 1.500% MATURITY: 10/31/24
TRADE DATE 10/31/22 SET/DATE 10/31/22
CUSIP 912828YM6
1,890,000.000 SHARES
Cumulative realized capital gain and loss position from 12/31/2021 for securities held in principal of account:

Short Term: 190,862.88-* Long Term: 13,003.20-* * The above gain and loss position does not include transactions where tax cost information is incomplete or unavailable. 10/28/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 261,278.76- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60 0.00 10/31/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 210,185.01- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60 0.00 10/31/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING PERIOD BALANCE 210,185.01- 261,278.76 55,019,757.60 0.00

Page 11 of 11 ends

e 019082 n 004343 a 02 t DOM i WI s 14,012

Page 352 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 590 of 1916 ends

Current Period Year-to-Date
Go Paperless.

Visit us at www.bnymellon.com
CLIENT SERVICE MANAGER: GREGORY LAFFERTY
Percent of all
Investments Asset Classification Market Value 100% TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS 32,947,240 .77
Estimated Market
Asset Classification Market Value Cost Accrued Income Annual Income Yield ACCOUNT TOTALS 32,947,240 .77 34,721,055 .91 114,530 .98 643,604.50 1.95 % Realized
Transaction Category Income Principal Gains/Losses Income Principal OPENING BALANCE 56,640.34 - 95,022.23 0.00 0.00 Account Statement
Account Overview
Summary of Assets Held by Asset Classification
Summary of Cash Transactions by Transaction Category
Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Account 255108 Base Currency = USD
CITY OF HEMET 1 5STR
4655 SALISBURY RD STE 300
AIM-324-0000
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256
904-645-1939
[email protected]
99% FIXED INCOME 32,407,992 .30
1% CASH AND SHORT TERM 539,248.47
FIXED INCOME 32,407,992 .30 34,129,629 .04 114,387 .90 640,362.50 1.98 % CASH AND SHORT TERM 539,248.47 591,426.87 143.08 3,242.00 0.60 % INTEREST 58,107.48 0.00 0.00 250,194.50 0.00 MUNICIPAL BOND INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,315.00 0.00 SALES AND REDEMPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,082.85 3,481,691 .41

Page 1 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,762

Page 353 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 591 of 1916 ends

Current Period Year-to-Date
Realized
Transaction Category Income Principal Gains/Losses Income Principal CLOSING BALANCE 2,595.36 - 95,022.23 0.00 2,595.36 - 95,022.23 Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Summary of Cash Transactions by Transaction Category - Continued OTHER CASH ADDITIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,042,713 .77 OTHER CASH DISBURSEMENTS 4,062.50 - 0.00 0.00 210,464.52 - 0.00 PURCHASES 0.00 0.00 0.00 73,723.19 - 12,429,382 .95 - The above cash transactions summary is provided for information purposes only and may not reflect actual taxable income or deductible expenses as reportable under the Internal Revenue Code.

Account 255108 Base Currency = USD
CITY OF HEMET 1 5STR

Page 2 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,763

Page 354 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 592 of 1916 ends

Accrued Estimated Market
Shares/Par Value Asset Description Market Price Market Value Cost Average Cost Income Income Yield Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Statement of Assets Held by Asset Classification
Account 255108 Base Currency = USD
CITY OF HEMET 1 5STR
1,000,000.000 AMAZON.COM INC 99.40300 994,030.00 998,140.00 99.81400 4,600.00 24,000.00 2.41% CUSIP: 023135AW6
MATURITY DATE: 02/22/2023
RATE: 2.400%
MOODY'S A1
S&P AA
1,180,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 97.50800 1,150,594.40 1,178,156.25 99.84375 3,727.58 14,750.00 1.28% CUSIP: 912828S92
MATURITY DATE: 07/31/2023
RATE: 1.250%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,180,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 97.15200 1,146,393.60 1,178,709.37 99.89062 1,426.37 16,225.00 1.42% CUSIP: 912828T26
MATURITY DATE: 09/30/2023
RATE: 1.375%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,180,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 97.05500 1,145,249.00 1,182,719.53 100.23047 52.97 19,175.00 1.67% CUSIP: 912828T91
MATURITY DATE: 10/31/2023
RATE: 1.625%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,180,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.57400 1,127,773.20 1,163,452.34 98.59766 2,982.07 8,850.00 0.78% CUSIP: 91282CDR9
MATURITY DATE: 12/31/2023
RATE: 0.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,180,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.39800 1,125,696.40 1,165,342.19 98.75781 2,609.31 10,325.00 0.92% CUSIP: 91282CDV0
MATURITY DATE: 01/31/2024
RATE: 0.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,215,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 96.15200 1,168,246.80 1,225,441.40 100.85937 67.13 24,300.00 2.08% CUSIP: 912828X70
MATURITY DATE: 04/30/2024
RATE: 2.000%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,215,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.41400 1,159,280.10 1,218,654.49 100.30078 7,164.54 21,262.50 1.83% CUSIP: 9128286Z8
MATURITY DATE: 06/30/2024
RATE: 1.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,215,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.20300 1,156,716.45 1,218,559.57 100.29297 5,373.40 21,262.50 1.84% CUSIP: 912828Y87
MATURITY DATE: 07/31/2024
RATE: 1.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,200,000.000 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP 97.78600 1,173,432.00 1,200,504.00 100.04200 8,360.00 39,600.00 3.37% CUSIP: 3133ENG20
MATURITY DATE: 08/15/2024

FIXED INCOME

Page 3 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,764

Page 355 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 593 of 1916 ends

Accrued Estimated Market
Shares/Par Value Asset Description Market Price Market Value Cost Average Cost Income Income Yield Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Statement of Assets Held by Asset Classification - Continued Account 255108 Base Currency = USD
CITY OF HEMET 1 5STR
RATE: 3.300%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,200,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 96.75600 1,161,072.00 1,190,364.00 99.19700 4,600.00 34,500.00 2.97% CUSIP: 3130A2UW4
MATURITY DATE: 09/13/2024
RATE: 2.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,215,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 94.26200 1,145,283.30 1,209,494.53 99.54687 50.35 18,225.00 1.59% CUSIP: 912828YM6
MATURITY DATE: 10/31/2024
RATE: 1.500%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,215,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.20300 1,156,716.45 1,229,380.67 101.18359 10,863.63 25,818.75 2.23% CUSIP: 9128283J7
MATURITY DATE: 11/30/2024
RATE: 2.125%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,215,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 94.03100 1,142,476.65 1,208,782.62 99.48828 7,668.44 18,225.00 1.60% CUSIP: 912828YV6
MATURITY DATE: 11/30/2024
RATE: 1.500%
MOODY'S Aaa
400,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 92.64900 370,596.00 379,496.00 94.87400 1,455.56 4,000.00 1.08% CUSIP: 3130AQF40
MATURITY DATE: 12/20/2024
RATE: 1.000%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
900,000.000 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 93.15200 838,368.00 862,353.00 95.81700 3,510.00 16,200.00 1.93% CUSIP: 89236TGT6
MATURITY DATE: 02/13/2025
RATE: 1.800%
MOODY'S A1
S&P A+
1,300,000.000 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 90.75500 1,179,815.00 1,212,679.00 93.28300 203.13 8,125.00 0.69% CUSIP: 3135G03U5
MATURITY DATE: 04/22/2025
RATE: 0.625%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
475,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 95.91000 455,572.50 461,529.30 97.16406 3,451.17 13,656.25 3.00% CUSIP: 912828Y79
MATURITY DATE: 07/31/2025
RATE: 2.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,200,000.000 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 96.67700 1,160,124.00 1,199,148.00 99.92900 9,466.67 42,600.00 3.67% CUSIP: 69371RR99
MATURITY DATE: 08/11/2025

Page 4 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,765

Page 356 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 594 of 1916 ends

Accrued Estimated Market
Shares/Par Value Asset Description Market Price Market Value Cost Average Cost Income Income Yield Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Statement of Assets Held by Asset Classification - Continued Account 255108 Base Currency = USD
CITY OF HEMET 1 5STR
RATE: 3.550%
MOODY'S A1
S&P A+
1,000,000.000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP 88.74700 887,470.00 1,000,000.00 100.00000 473.61 5,500.00 0.62% CUSIP: 3134GWWT9
MATURITY DATE: 09/30/2025
RATE: 0.550%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,000,000.000 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP 88.51600 885,160.00 1,004,240.00 100.42400 3,733.33 8,000.00 0.90% CUSIP: 14913R2H9
MATURITY DATE: 11/13/2025
RATE: 0.800%
MOODY'S A2
S&P A
750,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 94.53500 709,012.50 719,941.41 95.99219 4,975.37 19,687.50 2.78% CUSIP: 9128286A3
MATURITY DATE: 01/31/2026
RATE: 2.625%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,000,000.000 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP 88.18300 881,830.00 1,000,000.00 100.00000 1,376.67 8,400.00 0.95% CUSIP: 3133EMSK9
MATURITY DATE: 03/02/2026
RATE: 0.840%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,000,000.000 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP 88.00600 880,060.00 1,000,000.00 100.00000 1,155.56 8,000.00 0.91% CUSIP: 3133EMSU7
MATURITY DATE: 03/09/2026
RATE: 0.800%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,255,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 91.39500 1,147,007.25 1,256,568.75 100.12500 5,946.76 23,531.25 2.05% CUSIP: 912828Y95
MATURITY DATE: 07/31/2026
RATE: 1.875%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,000,000.000 MARYLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 92.15200 921,520.00 1,019,370.00 101.93700 4,771.67 28,630.00 3.11%

ADMINISTRATION
CUSIP: 57419RD28
MATURITY DATE: 09/01/2026
RATE: 2.863%
MOODY'S Aa1
700,000.000 APPLE INC 90.39000 632,730.00 667,786.00 95.39800 1,993.06 14,350.00 2.27% CUSIP: 037833DN7
MATURITY DATE: 09/11/2026
RATE: 2.050%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
1,255,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 90.32400 1,133,566.20 1,243,234.38 99.06250 1,792.86 20,393.75 1.80% CUSIP: 912828YG9

Page 5 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,766

Page 357 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 595 of 1916 ends

Accrued Estimated Market
Shares/Par Value Asset Description Market Price Market Value Cost Average Cost Income Income Yield Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Statement of Assets Held by Asset Classification - Continued Account 255108 Base Currency = USD
CITY OF HEMET 1 5STR
MATURITY DATE: 09/30/2026
RATE: 1.625%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,850,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 92.75400 1,715,949.00 1,751,357.42 94.66797 4,065.93 46,250.00 2.70% CUSIP: 91282CEF4
MATURITY DATE: 03/31/2027
RATE: 2.500%
MOODY'S Aaa
1,675,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 93.67600 1,569,073.00 1,653,473.63 98.71484 127.24 46,062.50 2.94% CUSIP: 91282CEN7
MATURITY DATE: 04/30/2027
RATE: 2.750%
MOODY'S Aaa
575,000.000 UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND 91.23800 524,618.50 536,367.19 93.28125 2,742.19 12,937.50 2.47% CUSIP: 9128282R0
MATURITY DATE: 08/15/2027
RATE: 2.250%
MOODY'S Aaa
600,000.000 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP 93.76000 562,560.00 594,384.00 99.06400 3,601.33 17,520.00 3.11% CUSIP: 3133ENG87
MATURITY DATE: 08/17/2027
RATE: 2.920%
MOODY'S Aaa
S&P AA+
250,000.000 BMW BK NORTH AMER SALT LAKE 25SEP25 88.73031 221,825.77 250,000.00 100.00000 126.71 1,250.00 0.56% CUSIP: 05580AXF6
MATURITY DATE: 09/25/2025
RATE: 0.500%
249,000.000 MERRICK BK SOUTH JORDAN UTA 29MAY25 90.35977 224,995.84 249,000.00 100.00000 16.37 1,992.00 0.89% CUSIP: 59013KHV1
MATURITY DATE: 05/29/2025
RATE: 0.800%
CASH BALANCE 92,426.87 92,426.87 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00% Total Market Value Plus Total Accrued Income 33,061,771.75 Total FIXED INCOME 32,407,992.30 34,129,629.04 114,387.90 640,362.50 1.98%

CASH AND SHORT TERM
Total CASH AND SHORT TERM 539,248.47 591,426.87 143.08 3,242.00 0.60% ACCOUNT TOTALS 32,947,240.77 34,721,055.91 114,530.98 643,604.50 1.95%

Page 6 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,767

Page 358 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 596 of 1916 ends

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
RATE: 0.625% MATURITY: 04/22/25
TRADE DATE 10/22/22 SET/DATE 10/22/22
CUSIP 3135G03U5
1,300,000.000 SHARES
10/28/22 Cash Debit 4,062.50- 0.00 0.00 0.00 BNF: CITY OF HEMET NOTPROVIDED
DETAIL: 9/30/2022 ATTENTION: ACCOUNTING
MAN
DETAIL: AGER
A/C WITH: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
94104,CALIFORNIA,US
10/31/22 Interest 163.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 MERRICK BK SOUTH JORDAN UTA 29MAY25
RATE: 0.800% MATURITY: 05/29/25
TRADE DATE 10/29/22 SET/DATE 10/29/22
CUSIP 59013KHV1
249,000.000 SHARES
10/31/22 Interest 9,587.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 1.625% MATURITY: 10/31/23
TRADE DATE 10/31/22 SET/DATE 10/31/22
CUSIP 912828T91
1,180,000.000 SHARES
10/31/22 Interest 12,150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 2.000% MATURITY: 04/30/24
TRADE DATE 10/31/22 SET/DATE 10/31/22
CUSIP 912828X70
1,215,000.000 SHARES
10/31/22 Interest 9,112.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 1.500% MATURITY: 10/31/24
TRADE DATE 10/31/22 SET/DATE 10/31/22
CUSIP 912828YM6
1,215,000.000 SHARES
10/31/22 Interest 23,031.25 0.00 0.00 0.00

UNITED STATES TREASURY NOTE/BOND
RATE: 2.750% MATURITY: 04/30/27
TRADE DATE 10/31/22 SET/DATE 10/31/22
10/01/22 ACCOUNT OPENING PERIOD BALANCE 56,640.34- 95,022.23 34,628,629.04 10/24/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 52,577.84- 95,022.23 34,628,629.04 0.00 10/28/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 56,640.34- 95,022.23 34,628,629.04 0.00

Page 7 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,768

Page 359 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 597 of 1916 ends

Realized
Transaction Date Transaction Description Income Principal Cost Gains/Losses Statement Period 10/01/2022 Through 10/31/2022
Statement of Transactions by Transaction Date - Continued Account 255108 Base Currency = USD
CITY OF HEMET 1 5STR
CUSIP 91282CEN7
1,675,000.000 SHARES
Cumulative realized capital gain and loss position from 12/31/2021 for securities held in principal of account:

Short Term: 68,956.25-* Long Term: 0.00 * * The above gain and loss position does not include transactions where tax cost information is incomplete or unavailable. 10/31/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING DAILY BALANCE 2,595.36- 95,022.23 34,628,629.04 0.00 10/31/22 ACCOUNT CLOSING PERIOD BALANCE 2,595.36- 95,022.23 34,628,629.04 0.00

Page 8 of 8 ends

e 036765 n 022026 a 02 t DOM i WI s 82,769

Page 360 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 598 of 1916 ends

11/18/22, 10:13 AM LAIF Regular Monthly Statement
https://laifms.treasurer.ca.gov/RegularStatement.aspx 1/1 Local Agency Investment Fund
P.O. Box 942809
Sacramento, CA 94209-0001
(916) 653-3001
November 18, 2022
LAIF Home
PMIA Average Monthly
Yields

CITY OF HEMET

CITY TREASURER
445 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE
HEMET, CA 92543-4209
Account Number: 98-33-362
October 2022 Statement
Tran Type Definitions
Effective
Date
Transaction
Date
Tran
Type Confirm
Number
Web
Confirm
Number Authorized Caller Amount
10/14/2022 10/13/2022 QRD 1716449 N/A SYSTEM 219,684.20 Account Summary
Total Deposit: 219,684.20 Beginning Balance: 64,563,012.49 Total Withdrawal: 0.00 Ending Balance: 64,782,696.69

Page 361 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 599 of 1916 ends

11/18/22, 10:14 AM Untitled Page
https://laif.sco.ca.gov/Result.aspx 1/1

BETTY T. YEE

California State Controller

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND

REMITTANCE ADVICE
Agency Name HEMET

Account Number 98-33-362
As of 10/14/2022, your Local Agency Investment Fund account has been directly creditedwith the interest earned on your deposits for the quarter ending 09/30/2022.

Earnings Ratio .00003699565555327
Interest Rate 1.35%
Dollar Day Total $ 5,938,108,066.58
Quarter End Principal Balance$ 64,563,012.49
Quarterly Interest Earned $ 219,684.20

Page 362 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 600 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
Cash with Fiscal Agent: US BANK
2006 Refunding Bonds Series Heartland Project
Date Activity
*****2000
788-1508
Bond
*****2002
788-1508
Special
*****2005
788-1506
Reserve
TOTAL
All Accounts
06/30/22 BALANCE 73.47 1,056,728.94 274,142.25 1,330,944.66 07/31/22 Interest 0.04 173.63 157.81 331.48 Transfer funds 157.81 - (157.81) - BALANCE 231.32 1,056,902.57 274,142.25 1,331,276.14 08/31/22 Interest 0.21 977.99 275.51 1,253.71 Transfer funds 275.51 - (275.51) - BALANCE 507.04 1,057,880.56 274,142.25 1,332,529.85 09/30/22 Interest 0.75 1,601.48 415.02 2,017.25 Transfer funds 415.02 - (415.02) - Transfer funds 606,448.85 (606,448.85) - - Debt Service (606,956.25) - - (606,956.25) BALANCE 415.41 453,033.19 274,142.25 727,590.85 10/31/22 Interest 0.70 783.40 474.10 1,258.20 Transfer funds 474.10 - (474.10) - BALANCE 890.21 453,816.59 274,142.25 728,849.05 Cash Equivalents - First American Treas Oblig 728,848.05 US Treasury Notes, various -
Miscellaneous Assets - AMBAC Assurance 1.00
Total 728,849.05

Page 363 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 601 of 1916 ends

HEMET SUCCESSOR AGENCY to
Former Hemet Redevelopment Project Area
Cash W/Fiscal Agent: US Bank (switched from MUFG Union Bank N.A. 08/01/2021) 2014 Hemet Refunding Project TAB Series A
Riverside County Public Financing - Fiscal Agent City of Hemet as Successor Agency (SA) to former Hemet RDA Date Activity
******5701
Revenue
Fund
******5702
Interest
Fund
******5703
Principal
Fund
******5704
Bond Purchase
Fund
******5800
SA to Hemet
RDA 2014 TTE
******5801
Debt Service
Fund
******5802
Interest
Account
******5803
Principal
Account
TOTAL
All Accounts
06/30/22 BALANCE - - - 7,420,000.08 - - - - - 07/31/22 Interest - - - - - - - - - COH Wire - - - - - 753,671.88 - - 753,671.88 BALANCE - - - 7,420,000.08 - 753,671.88 - - 753,671.88 08/31/22 Interest - - - - - 161.80 - - 161.80 Transfers - - - - - (161.80) 161.80 - - BALANCE - - - 7,420,000.08 - 753,671.88 161.80 - 753,833.68 09/30/22 Interest - - - 143,671.88 - 1,115.08 0.23 - 1,115.31 Debt Service - (143,671.88) (610,000.00) - - - (143,671.88) (610,000.00) (753,671.88) Transfers (753,671.88) 143,671.88 610,000.00 - - (610,000.00) - 610,000.00 - Transfers 753,671.88 - - (753,671.88) - (143,671.88) 143,671.88 - - Transfers - - - - - (1,115.08) 1,115.08 - - BALANCE - - - 6,810,000.08 - - 1,277.11 - 1,277.11 10/31/22 Interest - - - - - - 2.08 - 2.08 Transfers - - - - - - - - - BALANCE - - - 6,810,000.08 - - 1,279.19 - 1,279.19 Held by Fiscal Agent for County of Riverside 6,810,000.08 Held by Fiscal Agent for City of Hemet 1,279.19 Municipal Bond Insurance - BAM (Acct 5701) 0.00 Municipal Bond Insurance - BAM (Acct 5804) 1.00

Page 364 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 602 of 1916 ends

CITY OF HEMET
Cash with Fiscal Agent: PARS
U5-PEB16A
Date Activity
Fund 789
OPEB
Fund 792
Pension
TOTAL
All Accounts
06/30/22 BALANCE 2,082,554.49 - 2,082,554.49 07/31/22 Earnings 104,349.00 - 104,349.00 Contributions - - - Expenses (Admin Fees) (1,043.40) - (1,043.40) BALANCE 2,185,860.09 - 2,185,860.09 08/31/22 Earnings (37,597.07) (3,116.45) (40,713.52) Contributions 234,800.00 500,000.00 734,800.00 Expenses (Admin Fees) (1,029.83) - (1,029.83) BALANCE 2,382,033.19 496,883.55 2,878,916.74 09/30/22 Earnings (163,242.04) (34,046.60) (197,288.64) Contributions - - - Expenses (Admin Fees) (1,087.29) (103.52) (1,190.81) BALANCE 2,217,703.86 462,733.43 2,680,437.29 10/31/22 Earnings 80,862.88 16,872.38 97,735.26 Contributions - - - Expenses (Admin Fees) (1,083.75) (226.10) (1,309.85) BALANCE 2,297,482.99 479,379.71 2,776,862.70

Page 365 of 365 ends

19.B

Page 603 of 1916 ends

Page 604 of 1916 ends

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT

Meeting: City Council Meeting - Dec 13 2022
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Veronica Allen, Management Analyst;

☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☒ Public Hearing

TITLE:

2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant Initial Public Hearing

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing and take testimony, if any; and,

2. Receive and consider all comments for incorporation in the City of Hemet 2023 -2024 Annual Action Plan Draft.

BACKGROUND:

The City of He met is an entitlement City of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and as such, receives annual grants on a formula basis from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The purpose of CDBG is to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development, and providing improved community facilities and services, with maximum feasible priority given to activities that benefit low and moderate -income persons. The City of Hemet is responsible for developing its own programs and funding priorities within the CDBG (HUD) requirements, as well as monitoring sub- recipients of the funds awarded under this grant.

In order to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, the City is required to prepare an Annual Action Plan. This plan identifies the City’s priorities and objectives for CDBG funding during the 2023-2024 program year. CDBG funds can be used for a variety of activities including but not limited to, afterschool activities, child care, education, health programs, job training, public transportation, and senior or youth programs. In addition, CDBG can fund public facilities development or improvements such as c linics, community centers, domestic violence, and homeless shelters, economic development activities, fire stations, libraries, parks and playgrounds, and street improvements. The participation of residents, service providers, government agencies, c ommunity organizations, businesses, and other interested parties is an essential part of developing the City’s Annual Action Plan (AAP).

Page 1 of 2 ends

20.A

Page 605 of 1916 ends

It is anticipated that the City will receive approximately $872,957 in CDBG funding for the 2023 -2024 program year, from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024. The Notice of Funding Availability was published in La Prensa and The Press-Enterprise on October 7, 2022. The CDBG funding applications were made available for interested parties to apply from October 7 through December 2, 2022. All applications were due to the City on December 5, 2022. Regulations established by HUD for receiving CDBG fund ing require citizen participation in establishing funding needs and priorities. Information gathered will be summarized and incorporated into the City’s 2023 -2024 Annual Action Plan. To date, no written public comments have been received. The Annual Acti on Plan draft will be available for public review, comment, and a public hearing before final submission to HUD before July 11, 2023.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

The proposed action aligns with Council adopted objective of Quality of Life:

Objective 1: Enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight.

GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.

The proposed action aligns with Council adopted objective of Community Engagement:

Objective 1: Deliver messaging to the Community that connects, is consistent, and relevant.

Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.

Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.

GOAL FOUR: PARTNERSHIP & COLLABORATION
To pursue partnerships that will increase the opportunities available to the community, including our businesses, unemployed, and youth populations.

The proposed action aligns with Council adopted objective of Partnership & Collaboration:

Objective 1: Develop concepts and programs to increase opportunities for youth recreation.

Objective 2: Develop concepts and programs to enhance the quality of life services.

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

The proposed action aligns with Council adopted objective of Organizational Effectiveness:

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No General Fund Impact. Funding for this activity will be included in the FY 2023 -2024 Community Development (CDBG) budget, Fund 240.

Page 2 of 2 ends

20.A

Page 606 of 1916 ends

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT

Meeting: City Council Meeting - Dec 13 2022
Department: Community Development
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
H. P. Kang, Community Development Director, Monique Alaniz-Flejter, Principal Planner;

☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☒ Public Hearing

TITLE:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Adopting General Plan Amendment (GPA 21-003), a City-Initiated Proposal to amend the City of Hemet General Plan Circulation Element to adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Thresholds for the purpose of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Impact Analysis; and Finding that the Project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA in Accordance with 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Open a public hearing and take testimony, if any, and

2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Adopting General Plan Amendment 21 -003, a City -Initiated Proposal to amend the City of Hemet General Plan Circulation Element to adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Thresholds for the purpose of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Impact Analysis (Exhibits 1A and 1B); and Finding that the Project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA in Accordance with 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

BACKGROUND:

Circulation Element Amendment No. 1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) On October 18, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution recommendin g approval to the City Council regarding an update to the Circulation Element regarding Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) thresholds for CEQA purposes pursuant to the passage of Senate Bill 743.

Senate Bill 743, (SB 743), was signed by the Governor in 2013, changing the way transportation impacts are identified. The legislation directed the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation as a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impact. The Final OPR guidelines were released in December 2018 and identified vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the preferred metric moving forward.

Page 1 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 607 of 1916 ends

In anticipation of the change to VMT, the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) completed an SB 743 Implementation Pathway Study in 2019 to assist their member organizations, which include Hemet, with answering important implementation questions about the methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT impact analysis.

The City of Hemet retained the firm of Fehr and Peers to build on the work WRCOG started in order to determine appropriate thresholds of significance, analysis methodologies, and mitigation strategies for traffic impact analysis. The City of Hemet’s SB 743 Implementation Study applied the latest information available in the context specific to the City of Hemet as part of the SB 2 Planning Grant program.

Circulation Element Amendment No. 2
On November 1, 2022, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of modification of GPA 21-003 to also include the removal of a segment of the future Whittier Avenue street alignment from the City of Hemet General Plan Roa dway Circulation Master Plan for property identified as APN 456 - 030-020. The Planning Commission recommended that the Infrastructure Commission provide input prior to a Council hearing. At a public meeting held on November 28, 2022, the Infrastructure Commission provided input. At that meeting, overriding concerns were expressed regarding the proposal and that the item should be continued in order to further explore the request.

Based on the urgency to comply with of Senate Bill 743, staff has modified the General Plan Amendment 21-003 to only include Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

ANALYSIS:

Circulation Element Amendment for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

To avoid unnecessary delays or revisions and to streamline the TIA preparation and review process, the City requires applicants to submit a Project Scoping Form to the City for approval prior to the preparation and submittal of a draft TIA. The Project Scoping Form includes the process for VMT assessment. The guidelines outline a process to screen certain p rojects from VMT analysis based on project type and location. Since all projects are unique, there may be exceptions in unusual or complex situations where a VMT analysis is appropriate.

The TIA Guidelines for assessing VMT under CEQA comply with the Office of Planning and Research (OPR’s) CEQA Guidelines and build on WRCOG’s Implementation Pathway Study and the City of Hemet’s SB 743 Implementation Study. The recommended Guidelines are consistent with the standards created by WRCOG.

Level of Service Analysis
The traditional means for assessing traffic impacts have been a Level of Service (LOS) analysis that evaluates intersection capacity, roadway link analysis, signal operations, and other factors. This methodology will remain in place as a method to evaluate transportation infrastructure capacity and consistency with the Hemet General Plan Circulation Element that continues to rely upon LOS standards. However, LOS is no longer appropriate in CEQA analysis.

DISCUSSION:

Tribal Consultation On June 27, 2022, a Tribal Consultation process pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 18 was circulated to the California Native tribes, identified by the California NAHC.

Page 2 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 608 of 1916 ends

The 90-day consultation period concluded on September 27, 2022, and no comments were received.

Correspondence from the Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians indicated no comment. Additionally, correspondence was received from the Quechan Indian Tribe also citing no comment. Notices were sent to the Agua Caliente Band, Augustine Tri be, Cabazon Tribe, Cahuilla Tribe, Los Coyotes Tribe, Morongo Tribe, Pala Band, Pechanga Tribe, Quechan Tribe, Ramona Band, Rincon Band, Santa Rosa Tribe, Soboba Tribe, Torres-Martinez Tribe.

Airport Land Use Commission Review
Airport Land Use Commissio n (ALUC) review is required when a local jurisdiction processes a legislative action like a General Plan Amendment, (GPA). The ALUC evaluates the potential effect of future development on local airports. In this case, the local airport is Hemet-Ryan which is administered under the Hemet -Ryan Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Because the proposed GPA is a policy change that does not involve new construction, it qualifies for a staff administrative ‘no impact’ review.

The City submitted an application to the ALUC on September 29, 2022, for their administrative review and was approved on October 19, 2022. The ALUC responded that the proposed GPA would not change the residential density or non -residential intensity, and therefore have no possibility of having an impact on air navigation. Accordingly, the proposed GPA is found consistent with the 2017 Hemet - Ryan Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Attachment No. 3).

On December 1, 2022, the City gave public notice by mail to the property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of APN 456-030-020 and published a notice in the Press Enterprise prior to the holding of a public hearing before the City Council at which time the proposed amendment to the City’s General Plan would be considered. As of the prep aration of this staff report, no comments in favor or in opposition have been received.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices by:

1. Building and maintain a transportation system that is designed to meet the current and future needs of Hemet’s residents and businesses while providing a balance between mobility, cost, and the quality of the City’s living environment.

2. Regional Coordination with appropriate jurisdictions and agencies to encourage the timely improvement of roadway and transit facilities that address area-wide and regional travel needs including the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP), and the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (C ETAP).

ALTERNATIVE(S):

California state law allows General Plans to be amended up to four times per year and the proposed amendment is part of the year 2022 Amendments.

Due to the limited number of General Plan Amendments allowed and scheduled am endments for the year 2023, staff recommends General Plan Amendment 21 -003 be adopted in the year 2022 for the flexibility of future scheduled General Plan Amendments, which include Safety Element, Environmental

Page 3 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 609 of 1916 ends

Justice Element, and several General Plan an d Zoning Consistency updates, and newly adopted Senate and Assembly Bills.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment No. 1 CC Resolution
Attachment No. 2 PC Reso Bill GPA 21-003 (10.18.2022)
Exhibit 1A (VMT) Draft City of Hemet Traffic Impact Analysis for CEQA and VMT Exhibit 1B (VMT) Amended Hemet General Plan Circulation Element Marked-Up Airport Land Use Commission Approval

Page 4 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 610 of 1916 ends

City Council Resolution
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21-003
Amendment to the Circulation Element

Page 1 of 5 ends

1 2
3 4CITY OF HEMET
5Hemet, California
6 7CITY COUNCIL
8RESOLUTION
9 10A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
11OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
12AMENDMENT NO. 21-003 UPDATING GENERAL PLAN
13CHAPTER 4 (CIRCULATION ELEMENT) TO ADOPT
14VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) THRESHOLDS FOR
15THE PURPOSE OF CEQA IMPACT ANALYSIS (CITY-
16WIDE); AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS
17CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
18CEQA) GUIDELINES.
19 20WHEREAS, on January 24, 2012, the Hemet City Council approved Resolution 21No. 4476 adopting a comprehensive General Plan update and certified the associated 22Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010061088); and 23 24WHEREAS, the Circulation Element is an element (Chapter 4) of the Hemet 25General Plan; and
26 27WHEREAS, California state law allows General Plans to be amended up to four 28times per year and the proposed amendment is part of 2022 Amendments to the Hemet 29General Plan; and
30WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to adopt amendments to the 31General Plan regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA) 21-003 in 32accordance with the Government Code Sections 65353, 65355, and 65090, and the 33Hemet Municipal Code; and
34 35WHEREAS, the City of Hemet initiated an amendment to the City of Hemet 36General Plan Circulation Element and to establish new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 37thresholds for the purposes of CEQA impact analysis pursuant to Senate Bill (“SB”) 743, 38that are applicable City-wide; and
39 40
41

Page 5 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 611 of 1916 ends

City Council Resolution
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21-003
Amendment to the Circulation Element

Page 2 of 5 ends

1WHEREAS, on October 18, 2022 after duly noticed hearings, the Hemet 2Planning Commission adopted a Resolution recommending that the City Council 3approve General Plan Amendment 21-003 and a finding that the project is Categorically 4Exempt in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines; and
5WHEREAS, on December 2, 2022 the City placed a notice in the Press 6Enterprise of the holding of a public hearing at which the General Plan Amendment 7(GPA) 21-003 would be considered by the City Council.
8 9WHEREAS, on December 13, 2022 the City Council held the noticed public 10hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or 11opposition to, the proposed General Plan Amendment, at which the City Council 12considered the proposed project.
13 14NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of 15Hemet does Resolve, Determine, Find and Order as follows:
16 17SECTION 1: (CEQA) ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
18The City Council, in light of the whole record before it, including but not limited to, the 19City’s Local CEQA Guidelines in the Staff Report dated December 13, 2022, hereby 20finds and determines as follows:
21 221. The City has analyzed this proposed General Plan Amendment and has 23determined that it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act 24(CEQA) under Section 15061 (b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides 25that CEQA only applies to projects that have a potential for causing a significant 26impact on the environment. GPA21-001 in itself does not relate to any physical 27project and will not result in any physical change to the environment and does 28not affect the land use or density limitations of the General Plan, except as 29superseded by State law. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that there is no 30possibility that this ordinance text amendment may have a significant adverse 31effect on the environment, and therefore, the adoption of this Ordinance is 32exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. 33 342. Adoption of new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) thresholds for the purposes of 35CEQA impact analysis is an action consistent with Senate Bill (“SB”) 743, will not 36result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the 37environment, and thus the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not 38subject to CEQA (14 CCR § 15378(a)). In addition, the thresholds and VMT 39Analysis Guidelines are not a “project” within the meaning of CEQA pursuant to 4014CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving procedures for the 41protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 4215308.Finally, if the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are determined to 43be subject to CEQA, they are exempt therefrom because it can be seen with

Page 6 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 612 of 1916 ends

City Council Resolution
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21-003
Amendment to the Circulation Element

Page 3 of 5 ends

1certainty that there is no possibility that these amendments will have a significant 2effect on the environment (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3).
3 4
5SECTION 2: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS
6 7The City Council hereby approves of General Plan Amendment No. 21-003, attached as 8Exhibits 1A and 1B to this Resolution on the following findings:
9 101. Substantial proof exists that the proposed change will promote the public 11health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the residents of Hemet. 12 13(VMT Thresholds) The proposed General Plan Amendment and adoption of new 14Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) thresholds will have many positive impacts to the 15City. The new thresholds will encourage the redevelopment of infill sites 16throughout the City which will promote the public health, safety, convenience and 17general welfare of the residents and businesses in Hemet in that the thresholds 18will provide a streamlined process for development review and result in clear, 19consistent and interpretable standards and processes. The proposed 20Amendment will therefore promote walkable, mixed-use developments though 21the City and near major transit centers to ultimately minimize the reliance of 22personal automobiles to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions at a local and 23regional scale.
24 252. The proposed change is in conformance with all applicable, officially adopted 26policies and plans.
27 28(VMT Thresholds) The proposed General Plan Amendment will be in 29conformance with recently adopted SB 743 legislation that address how 30transportation analysis is determined in the City of Hemet, and is consistent 31with the guidelines established by the Western Riverside Council of 32Governments (WRCOG).
33 343. Streets and public facilities existing or proposed are adequate to serve all uses 35permitted when the property is reclassified; and
36 37(VMT Thresholds) The proposed General Plan Amendment would update the 38thresholds that is currently used to evaluate transportation impacts in the City. 39The new thresholds do not directly require the creation of new streets and/or 40public facilities; rather, the Amendment emphasizes providing multi-modal 41transportation options and transportation demand and parking management 42strategies throughout the City. The proposed Amendments will support the 43expansion of the multi-modal and Complete Streets network to promote 44walkability, bicycle mobility and the use of mass transit to reduce the overall

Page 7 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 613 of 1916 ends

City Council Resolution
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21-003
Amendment to the Circulation Element

Page 4 of 5 ends

1use of personal, single-occupancy vehicle trips and overall greenhouse gas 2emissions.
3 4
5SECTION 3: FINDINGS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF 6THE GENERAL PLAN
7 8The proposed General Plan Amendment serves to implement the following Goals and 9Policies of Chapter 4 (Circulation Element):
10 11Goal C-1. Build and maintain a transportation system that is designed to meet 12the current and future needs of Hemet’s residents and businesses while 13providing a balance between mobility, cost, and the quality of the City’s living 14environment.
15 16Policy C-1.17. Traffic Analyses Evaluate development proposals for potential 17impacts on the transportation and infrastructure system based on traffic 18analyses that follow the protocols established by the City. The traffic analysis 19should evaluate the need for both ultimate and interim improvements resulting 20from the development proposal.
21 22Goal C-2: Coordinate and cooperate in the implementation of regional and inter- 23jurisdictional transportation plans and regional transportation systems. 24 25Policy C-2.2. Regional Coordination Coordinate with appropriate jurisdictions 26and agencies to encourage the timely improvement of roadway and transit 27facilities that address area-wide and regional travel needs including the State 28Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Riverside County Integrated 29Project (RCIP), and the Community and Environmental Transportation 30Acceptability Process (CETAP).
31 32Policy C-2.5. Regional Impacts Coordinate with Riverside County and adjacent 33jurisdictions regarding the planning, coordination, and impacts of circulation 34improvements in adjacent jurisdictions, the Sphere of Influence area and the 35Planning Area.
36 37Goal C-4: Promote and support modes of transportation that offer an alternative 38to single-occupancy automobile use and help reduce air pollution and road 39congestion.
40 41Policy C-4.6. Vehicle Mile Reduction Encourage and promote the reduction of 42vehicle miles traveled for all vehicles and for carbon-based fueled vehicles, and 43reduce the use of gasoline and diesel fuel for on-road vehicles in accordance 44with Senate Bill 375 regional and/or sub-regional targets established by the 45California Air Resources Board and by Senate Bill 743 (VMT traffic impact 46analysis). Create and implement programs that will aid in improving air quality

Page 8 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 614 of 1916 ends

City Council Resolution
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21-003
Amendment to the Circulation Element

Page 5 of 5 ends

1by reducing motor vehicle trips, such as those programs recommended by the 2Regional Transportation Plan, Riverside County Integrated Project, and the 3Southern California Air Quality Management Board.
4 5
6SECTION 4: CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
7 8The City Council hereby approves the following:
9 101.Finding the project Categorically Exempt from CEQA. In compliance with 11CEQA Guidelines §15061 (b) (3), the Community Development Director shall 12prepare a Notice of Exemption concerning the findings made in Section 1 of this 13Resolution, and within five (5) working days of the project approval, file a Notice 14with the Riverside County Clerk for posting.
15 162.Approve General Plan Amendment No. 21-003, updating General Plan 17Chapter 4 (Circulation Element) in compliance with State mandated requirements 18for the 2021-2029 housing element cycle.
19 20PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13 th day of December, 2022, by the 21following vote:
22AYES:
23NOES:
24ABSTAIN:
25ABSENT
26 27________________________________
28Malcolm Lilienthal, Mayor
29 30
31 32
33ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
34 35
36___________________________ _______________________________ 37John P. Maier, City Clerk Steven P. Graham, City Attorney 38

Page 9 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 615 of 1916 ends

Planning Commission Resolution NO. PC2022-024
GPA 21-003

Page 1 of 4 ends

1 2
3 4
5 6
7CITY OF HEMET
8Hemet, California
9 10PLANNING COMMISSION
11RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-024
12 13A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
14THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
15THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION
16AMENDING THE CITY OF HEMET GENERAL PLAN
17CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND ADOPTION OF VEHICLE
18MILES OF TRAVEL (VMT) THRESHOLDS FOR THE
19PURPOSE OF CEQA IMPACT ANALYSIS
20 21WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has the authority to make a 22recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment 23(GPA) 21-003 in accordance with the Government Code Sections 65353, 65355, and 2465090, and the Hemet Municipal Code; and
25 26WHEREAS, the Community Development Director determined that the proposed 27GPA is categorially exempt from CEQA and recommend that the City Council approve an 28Ordinance approving General Plan Amendment No. 21-003 based on the findings outlined 29therein; and
30 31WHEREAS, on October 6, 2022, the City gave public notice by advertising in the 32Press Enterprise of the holding of a public hearing at which the proposed General Plan 33Amendment No. 21-003 would be considered by the Planning Commission; and 34 35WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Hemet, has reviewed 36General Plan Amendment No. 21-003 in accordance with the authority granted by the 37California Government Code §65353, §65355, and §65090, and Hemet Municipal Code 3890-41; and
39 40WHEREAS, the Hemet Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public 41hearing on October 18, 2022 at which it received public testimony concerning General 42Plan Amendment No. 21-003
43 44NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Hemet does 45Resolve, Determine, Find and Order as follows:

Page 10 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 616 of 1916 ends

Planning Commission Resolution NO. PC2022-024
GPA 21-003

Page 2 of 4 ends

1SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
2 3The Planning Commission, in light of the whole record before it, including but not limited 4to, the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines and in accordance with the California 5Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the Planning Commission 6has been determined that the adoption of GPA 21-003 and adoption of new Vehicle 7Miles Traveled (VMT) thresholds for the purposes of CEQA impact analysis is an action 8consistent with Senate Bill (“SB”) 743, will not result in a direct or reasonably 9foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and thus the thresholds and 10VMT Analysis Guidelines are not subject to CEQA (14 CCR § 15378(a)). In addition, the 11thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not a “project” within the meaning of CEQA 12pursuant to 14CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving procedures for the 13protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 1415308.Finally, if the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are determined to be 15subject to CEQA, they are exempt therefrom because it can be seen with certainty that 16there is no possibility that these amendments will have a significant effect on the 17environment (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3).
18 19SECTION 2: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20 21The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 21-003, 22and adoption of new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) thresholds for the purposes of 23CEQA impact analysis based on the following findings:
24 251. Substantial proof exists that the proposed change will promote the public 26health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the residents of Hemet. 27 28The proposed General Plan Amendment and adoption of new Vehicle Miles 29Traveled (VMT) thresholds will have many positive impacts to the City. The new 30thresholds will encourage the redevelopment of infill sites throughout the City 31which will promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare of 32the residents and businesses in Hemet in that the thresholds will provide a 33streamlined process for development review and result in clear, consistent and 34interpretable standards and processes. The proposed Amendment will therefore 35promote walkable, mixed-use developments though the City and near major 36transit centers to ultimately minimize the reliance of personal automobiles to 37further reduce greenhouse gas emissions at a local and regional scale. 38 392. The proposed change is in conformance with all applicable, officially adopted 40policies and plans.
41 42The proposed General Plan Amendment will be in conformance with recently 43adopted SB 743 legislation that address how transportation analysis is 44determined in the City of Hemet, and is consistent with guidelines established 45by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) for implementation of 46SB 743.

Page 11 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 617 of 1916 ends

Planning Commission Resolution NO. PC2022-024
GPA 21-003

Page 3 of 4 ends

1 23. Streets and public facilities existing or proposed are adequate to serve all uses 3permitted when the property is reclassified; and
4 5The proposed General Plan Amendment would update the thresholds that is 6currently used to evaluate transportation impacts in the City. The new thresholds 7do not directly require the creation of new streets and/or public facilities; rather, 8the Amendment emphasizes providing multi-modal transportation options and 9transportation demand and parking management strategies throughout the City. 10The proposed Amendments will support the expansion of the multi-modal and 11Complete Streets network to promote walkability, bicycle mobility and the use of 12mass transit to reduce the overall use of personal, single-occupancy vehicle trips 13and overall greenhouse gas emissions.
14 15NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of 16Hemet, based on the foregoing findings, hereby adopts the findings in support of the 17General Plan Amendment for the adoption of new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 18thresholds for the purposes of CEQA impact analysis within the City of Hemet. 19 20SECTION 3: FINDINGS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF 21THE GENERAL PLAN
22 23The proposed General Plan Amendment serves to implement the following Goals and Policies 24of Chapter 4 (Circulation Element):
25 26Goal C-1. Build and maintain a transportation system that is designed to meet the 27current and future needs of Hemet’s residents and businesses while providing a 28balance between mobility, cost, and the quality of the City’s living environment. 29 30Policy C-1.17. Traffic Analyses Evaluate development proposals for potential 31impacts on the transportation and infrastructure system based on traffic analyses 32that follow the protocols established by the City. The traffic analysis should evaluate 33the need for both ultimate and interim improvements resulting from the development 34proposal.
35 36Goal C-2: Coordinate and cooperate in the implementation of regional and inter- 37jurisdictional transportation plans and regional transportation systems. 38 39Policy C-2.2. Regional Coordination Coordinate with appropriate jurisdictions and 40agencies to encourage the timely improvement of roadway and transit facilities that 41address area-wide and regional travel needs including the State Transportation 42Improvement Program (STIP), the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP), and 43the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP). 44 45Policy C-2.5. Regional Impacts Coordinate with Riverside County and adjacent 46jurisdictions regarding the planning, coordination, and impacts of circulation

Page 12 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 618 of 1916 ends

Planning Commission Resolution NO. PC2022-024
GPA 21-003

Page 4 of 4 ends

1improvements in adjacent jurisdictions, the Sphere of Influence area and the 2Planning Area.
3 4Goal C-4: Promote and support modes of transportation that offer an alternative to 5single-occupancy automobile use and help reduce air pollution and road 6congestion.
7 8Policy C-4.6. Vehicle Mile Reduction Encourage and promote the reduction of 9vehicle miles traveled for all vehicles and for carbon-based fueled vehicles, and 10reduce the use of gasoline and diesel fuel for on-road vehicles in accordance with 11Senate Bill 375 regional and/or sub-regional targets established by the California Air 12Resources Board and by Senate Bill 743 (VMT traffic impact analysis). Create and 13implement programs that will aid in improving air quality by reducing motor vehicle 14trips, such as those programs recommended by the Regional Transportation Plan, 15Riverside County Integrated Project, and the Southern California Air Quality 16Management Board.
17 18
19SECTION 4: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
20 21The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 22approving General Plan Amendment 21-003 and new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 23Guidelines, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 24“1.”
25 26PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18 th day of October, 2022 by the 27following vote:
28 29AYES: Chair Lemke, Commissioner Wuerth, Commissioner Booth 30NOES: NONE
31ABSTAIN: NONE
32ABSENT: Commissioner Hill, Vice Chair Beamesderfer
33 34
35________________________________
36Cyndi Lemke, Chair
37Hemet Planning Commission
38 39
40ATTEST:
41 42
43________________________________
44Corina Hernandez, Records Secretary
45Hemet Planning Commission

Page 13 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 619 of 1916 ends

1 DRAFT City of Hemet
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
For CEQA & VMT
May 2021

Page 14 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 620 of 1916 ends

2 Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Background ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 CEQA Changes ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Note to TIA Preparers ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Need for Transportation Impact Analysis 6
CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis 9
Analysis Methodology .....................................................................................................................................................10 CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds .....................................................................................................................................14 VMT Mitigation Measures ..............................................................................................................................................15 CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 16 Transportation Impact Study Format .........................................................................................................................17 Attachments 19
Attachment A: Project Scoping Form ........................................................................................................................20 Attachment B: Detailed VMT Forecasting Information .......................................................................................22 Attachment C: City of Hemet SB 743 Implementation Mitigation and TDM Strategy Assessment Memorandum .....................................................................................................................................................................24

Page 15 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 621 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021

3 Introduction

Page 16 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 622 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
4 Background
Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), signed by the Governor in 2013, is changing the way transportation impacts are identified. Specifically, the legislation has directed the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation as a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impact. The Final OPR guidelines were released in December 201 8 and identified vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the preferred metric moving forward. The Natural Resources Agency completed the rule making process to modify the CEQA guidelines in December of 2018.

In anticipation of the change to VMT, the Western Rive rside Council of Governments (WRCOG) completed a SB 743 Implementation Pathway Study in 2019 to assist their member organizations with answering important implementation questions about the methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT impact analysis. The City of Hemet is one of several WRCOG member organizations. The WRCOG study can be accessed on -line (http://www.fehrandpeers.com/wrcog-sb743/) and includes the following main components. • Thresholds Evaluation Memorandum – Potential thresholds WRCOG agencies could consider when establishing thresholds of significance for VMT assessment • Methodologies and Calculations Memorandum – Types of VMT that could be considered for impact assessment
• Tools Evaluation Memorandum – Types of tools that could be used to estimate VMT and the pros/cons associated with each tool
• Mitigation Memorandum – Types of mitigation that can be considered for VMT mitigation • VMT Screening Tool – An on-line GIS tool that can be used for VMT screening All WRCOG agencies can utilize the information produced through the Implementation Pathway Study to adopt their own methodology and significance thresholds for use in CEQA compliance.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) encour ages local agencies to adopt their own significance thresholds, which is key part of the SB 743 implementation process.

The City of Hemet built on the work WRCOG started in order to determine appropriate thresholds of significance, analysis methodologies, and mitigation strategies. The City of Hemet’s SB 743 Implementation Study applied the latest information available in the context specific for the City of Hemet. The study included the following components:
• SB 743 Small Project Screening Criteria Memorandum – Discussion of small project trip screening threshold options that deviate from the OPR recommendation • Mitigation and TDM Strategy Assessment Memorandum – Updated discussion of available mitigation and TDM strategies specific to the City of Hemet, including potential VMT exchanges and banks

Page 17 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 623 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
5 CEQA Changes
A key element of SB 743 is the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant impacts. The intent of this change is to assist in balancing the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Is Level of Service (LOS) Still Important?
The City of Hemet has adopted vehicle Level of Service (LOS) policies that set standards for which City infrastructure will strive to maintain. These policies are contained in the City’s General Plan and therefore apply to discretionary appro vals of new land use and transportation projects. For LOS traffic study requirements, refer to the Riverside County Transportation Department Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide (2008) .

Note to TIA Preparers
Changes to requirements for traffic analysis under CEQA are anticipated as CEQA law changes, the State CEQA Guidelines are updated and/or legal opinions on traffic analysis under CEQA are published. As such, The City of Hemet will periodically review these Guidelines for applicability .

Consultants should contact the Community Development Director to ensure that they are applying the most recent guidelines for project impact assessment.

The purpose of these TIA Guidelines is to provide general instructions for analyzing the potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects and land use changes (e.g., general plan amendments and changes of zone) . These Guidelines present the recommended format and methodology that should generally be utilized in the prepar ation of TIAs. These Guidelines utilize latest practices and comply with CEQA requirements prompted by Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). These recommendations are general guidelines, and the City of Hemet has the discretion to modify the TIA requirements based on the unique characteristics of a particular project.

These TIA Guidelines for assessing VMT under CEQA comply with OPR’s CEQA Guidelines and build on WRCOG’s Implementation Pathway Study and the City of Hemet’s SB 743 Implementation Study.

Page 18 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 624 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
6 Need for Transportation Impact
Analysis

Page 19 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 625 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
7 The need for a TIA related to VMT will stem from CEQA compliance. Discretionary actions of public agencies all trigger CEQA review, but whether a TIA is required depends on the findings of the City of Hemet initial study and the potential for the project to cause a significant impact.

Please note, a project may be required to complete a VMT assessment and not a LOS assessment, or vice versa. The need to complete a VMT assessment is described below. The applicant should also confirm if a LOS traffic study is needed. For LOS traffic study requirements, refer to the City’s latest adopted LOS Traffic Study Guidelines.

Need to Complete VMT as part of the TIA Analysis
The following activities generally will not require a TIA that includes VMT. This presumption is based on the substantial evidence provided in the OPR Technical Advisory supporting SB 743 implementation or is related to projects that are local-serving which, by definition, would decrease the number of trips or the distance those trips travel to access the development (and are VMT - reducing projects). Applicants should consult with the City’s Public Works Department if a project does not fall within the land uses listed but is anticipated to decrease VMT. • Local K-12 schools (I recommend that we keep these in the list even if at this time the City won’t be the lead agency approving new local schools)
• Local parks
• Day care centers
• Local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, including:
o Gas stations
o Banks
o Restaurants
o Shopping Center
o Service uses such as hair salons, barbers, gyms, equipment sales and rentals, home electronics and small appliance repair, laundromats, tailors, and other uses listed as permitted in the Hemet Municipal Code
• Local-serving hotels (e.g. non-destination hotels)
• Local-serving assembly uses (places of worship, community organizations) • Community institutions (Public libraries, fire stations, local government) • Local-serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the

RTP/SCS
• Student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses • Affordable or supportive housing
• Assisted living facilities
• Senior housing as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
• Re-tenanting of existing non-residential space
• Interior expansions
• Minor exterior expansions
• Projects generating less than 500 daily vehicle trips

Page 20 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 626 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
8 • Other local-serving projects as approved by the Planning and Building Director, City Engineer and/or Public Works Director
Coordination with the City of Hemet
To streamline the TIA preparation and review process, the TIA preparer shall solicit input and approval from the City prior to the preparation and submittal of a draft TIA document. A TIA “Project Scoping Form”, attached, shall be prepared by the Engineer and submitted to the City for approval prior to the preparation of a draft TIA. The Project Scoping Form provides for agreement of the following key points before initiating the TIA.
• Project trip generation
• Presentation of screening criteria used to screen the project from VMT assessment or proposed methodology/metrics that will be applied to estimate VMT • Identification of the appr opriate travel demand model or VMT estimation tool (RIVTAM, RIVCOM1 or WRCOG Screening Tool)
• Coordination with adjacent agencies
• VMT Analysis Scenarios and Methodology

1 Note – RIVCOM is currently under development with an anticipated completion date in the Summer/Fall of 2021. Once finalized, RIVCOM should be utilized for all forecasting activity. Please coordinate with WRCOG to ensure that the prepare utilizes the most recent travel demand forecasting model.

Page 21 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 627 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
9 CEQA Assessment - VMT
Analysis

Page 22 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 628 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
10 A key element of SB 743, signed in 2013, is the elimination of automobile delay and LOS as the sole basis of determining CEQA impacts. The most recent CEQA guidelines, released in December 2018, recommend VMT as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts. However, SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS as part of other plans (i.e., the general plan), studies, or ongoing network monitoring.

The following recommendations assist in determining VMT i mpact thresholds and mitigation requirements for various land use projects’ TIAs.

Analysis Methodology
For purposes of SB 743 compliance, a VMT analysis should be conducted for land use projects as deemed necessary by the Traffic Division and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the average VMT per service population (e.g. population plus employment) compared to the WRCOG region or the lead agency threshold. Normalizing VMT per service population provides a transportation efficiency metric for the analysis. Using this efficiency metric allows the user to compare the project to the rema inder of an established geographic area (city, county, or region) for purposes of identifying transportation impacts.

Project Screening
Below, are three options for screening projects from project-level assessment:

Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
Projects located within a TPA 2 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:

1. Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;

2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking);

3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the City of Hemet, with input from SCAG or WRCOG); or

2 A TPA is defined as a half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high- quality transit corridor per the definitions below.

Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 - ‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 - For purposes of this section, a ‘high-quality transit corridor’ means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.

Page 23 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 629 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
11 4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units.

As of May 2021, there are no TPAs within the City of Hemet. The analyst should confirm the status of transit service when reviewing the potential for project screening.

Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening
Residential and office projects located within a low VMT -generating area are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the re is a reasonable expectation that the project will generate VMT per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area.

For this screening in the City of Hemet, the RIVTAM travel forecasting model was used to measure VMT performance for individual jurisdictions and for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). TAZs are geographic polygons similar to Census block groups used to represent areas of homogenous travel behavior. Total daily VMT per service population (population plus employment) was estimated for each TAZ . This presumption may not be appropriate if the project land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips.

To identify if the project is in a low VMT -generating area, the analyst may revi ew the WRCOG screening tool and apply the appropriate threshold (identified later in this chapter) within the tool.

Additionally, as noted above, the analyst mus t identify if the project is consistent with the existing General Plan land use within that TAZ and use professional judgement that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise be misrepresented utilizing the data from the travel demand model.

The WRCOG screening tool can be accessed at the following location:
https://apps.fehrandpeers.com/WRCOGVMT/
Step 3: Project Type Screening
Local-serving projects, including retail projects less than 50,000 square feet, are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel.

Page 24 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 630 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
12 In addition to local serving r etail, the following uses can also be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature:
• Local-serving K-12 schools
• Local parks
• Day care centers
• Local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, including:
o Gas stations
o Banks
o Restaurants
o Shopping Center
o Service uses such as hair salons, barbers, gyms, equipment sales and rentals, home electronics and small appliance repair, laundromats, tailors, and other service uses listed as permitted in the Hemet Municipal Code
• Local-serving hotels (e.g. non-destination hotels)
• Student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses • Local-serving assembly uses (places of worship, community organizations) • Community institutions (Public libraries, fire stations, local government) • Local-serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the

RTP/SCS
• Affordable or supportive housing
• Assisted living facilities
• Senior housing as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
• Re-tenanting of existing non-residential space
• Interior expansions
• Minor exterior expansions
• Other local -serving projects as approved by the Planning and Building Director, City Engineer and/or Public Works Director
• Projects generating less than 500 net new daily vehicle trips3 o This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials:
▪ 52 single family housing units
▪ 68 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units ▪ 51,000 sq. ft. of office
▪ 100,000 sq. ft. of light industrial4
▪ 287,000 sq. ft. of warehousing4
▪ 357,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse4

3 Based on the City’s review of the small project screening criterion that have been adopted by neighboring and nearby cities, the City of Hemet has selected a small project screening criteria of 500 ADT. 500 ADT is consistent with the historical requirement for traffic studies of 50 peak hour trips. Furthermore, projects generating 500 ADT would not be expected to generate more than 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year, which would screen the project from GHG analysis, consistent with the South Coast AQMD draft threshold. 4 Threshold may be higher depending on the tenant and the use of the site. This number was estimated using rates from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual.

Page 25 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 631 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
13 VMT Assessment for Non-Screened Development
Projects not screened through the steps above should complete VMT analysis and forecasting through the RIVCOM model (once complete) or RIVTAM model to determine if they have a significant VMT impact. This analysis should include ‘project generated VMT’ and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates for the project transportation analysis zone ( TAZ or TAZs) under the following scenarios:
• Baseline conditions - This data is already available in the web screening map. • Baseline plus project for the project - The project land use would be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. A full base year model run would be performed and VMT changes would be isolated for the project TAZ and across the full model network. The model output must include reasonableness checks of the production and attraction balancing to ensure the project effect is accurately captured. If this scenario results in a less -than-significant impact, then additional cumulative scenario analysis may not be r equired (more information about this outcome can be found in the Thresholds Evaluation discussion later in this chapter). • Cumulative no project - This data is available from WRCOG. • Cumulative plus project - The project land use would either be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. The addition of project land uses should be accompanied by a reallocation of a similar amount of land use from other TAZs; especially if the proposed project is significant in size such that it would change other future developments. Land use projects will generally not change the cumulative no project control totals for population and employment growth. Instead, they will influence the land use supply through changes in gener al plan land use designations and zoning. If project land uses are simply added to the cumulative no project scenario, then the analysis should reflect this limitation in the methodology and acknowledge that the analysis may overestimate the project’s effect on VMT.

The model output should include total VMT, which includes all vehicle trips and trip purposes, and VMT per service population (population plus employment). Total VMT (by speed bin) is needed as an input for air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and energy impact analysis while total VMT p er service population is recommended for transportation impact analysis in City of Hemet.

Both “plus project” scenarios noted above will summarize two types of VMT: (1) project generated VMT per service population and comparing it back to the appropriate b enchmark noted in the thresholds of significance, and (2) the project effect on VMT, comparing how the project changes VMT on the network looking at Citywide VMT per service population and comparing it to the no project condition.

Project-generated VMT sh all be extracted from the travel demand forecasting model using the origin-destination methodology. Details on this calculation can be found in Attachment B. The

Page 26 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 632 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
14 project-effect on VMT shall be estimated using a City of Hemet boundary and extracting the total link-level VMT for both the no project and with project condition.

In some cases, it may be appropriate to extract the Project -generated VMT using the production - attraction trip matrix. This may be appropriate when a project is entirely composed of retail or office uses, and there is a need to isolate the home-based-work (HBW) VMT for the purposes of isolating commute VMT. It may also be appropriate when entirely composed a homogenous residential use.

The City should evaluate the appropriate methodology based on the project land use types and context. As the land use mix of individual projects and context of the surrounding transportation network and neighboring uses is unique to each project, this will be determined on a project -by- project basis based on the engineering judgment and standard of practice.

A detailed description of this process is attached to these guidelines as Attachment B.

CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds
The City of Hemet selected VMT thresholds of significance based on guidance/substantial evidence prepared in the WRCOG and City of Hemet Implementation Studies.

VMT Impacts
A project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied:

1. The baseline project -generated VMT per service population exceeds the City of Hemet baseline VMT per service population, or

2. The cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the City of Hemet baseline VMT per service population
The project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if it resulted in either of the following conditions to be satisfied:

1. The baseline link-level Citywide boundary VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition, or

2. The cumulative link -level Citywide boundary VMT per service population increase s under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition.

Please note that the cu mulative no project shall reflect the adopted R egional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy; as such, if a project is consistent with the regional RTP/SCS, then the project effect on VMT shall be considered less than significant subject to consideration of other substantial evidence.

Projects which are inconsistent with the regional RTP/SCS must review the potential for significant impacts under all four of the VMT impact criteria which are listed above. If a project results in a

Page 27 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 633 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
15 significant impact under any of the four impact criteria, it should present options for feasible mitigation measures to reduce the project impact to a less-than-significant level.

Projects which are consistent with the RTP/SCS must review the potential for significant impacts for the baseline project-generated VMT and cu mulative project-generated VMT thresholds which are listed above. If a project results in a significant impact under either of those criteria, it should present options for feasible mitigation measures to reduce the project impact to a less -than-significant level.

VMT Mitigation Measures
To mitigate VMT impacts, the following choices are available to the applicant:

1. Modify the project’s built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project

2. Implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) m easures to reduce VMT generated by the project

3. Participate in a VMT fee program and/or VMT mitigation exchange/banking program (if they are available) to reduce VMT from the project or other land uses to achieve acceptable levels
As part of the WRCOG Implementation Pathway Study and Hemet’s SB 743 Implementation Project, key TDM measures that are appropriate to the region were identified and can be accessed as Attachment of these Guidelines. Measures appropriate for Hemet are summarized in Attachment B of the City of Hemet SB 743 Implementation Mitigation and TDM Strategy Assessment Memorandum. Evaluation of VMT reductions should be evaluated using state -of-the-practice methodologies recognizing that many of the TDM strategies are dependent on building tenant performance over time. As such, actual VMT reduction cannot be reliably predicted and monitoring may be necessary to gauge performance related to mitigation expectations.

Page 28 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 634 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
16 CEQA Assessment - Active
Transportation and Public
Transit Analysis

Page 29 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 635 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
17 Potential impacts to public transit, pedestrian facilities and travel, and bicycle facilities and travel can be evaluated using the following criteria.
• A significant impact occurs if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities.

Therefore, the TIA should include analysis of a project to examine if it is inconsistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding active transportation or public transit facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities and make a determination as to whether it has the potential to conflict with existing or proposed facilities supporting these travel modes.

Transportation Impact Study Format
Prior to the beginning of any study, the project proponent shall coordinate with City Planning and Traffic Engineering staff. A tentative schedule for reviewing and processing the TIA will be developed by the City . Initial discussions shall also identify any key issues along with the development scope and boundaries of the study area. The proponent will submit a detailed site plan at this meeting. City staff will provide input into the following specific areas of the analysis:
• Defining the general study area boundaries
• Project access
• Approved development in the vicinity of the project for cumulative analysis • Appropriate Trip Generation rates for the project
The project proponent shall coordinate and discuss the details and technical aspects of the analysis with Traffic Engineering staff prior to a formal submittal. Topics of discussion will include:
• Potential for project level VMT screening
• VMT Analysis assumptions
• Inclusion of a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM) to mitigate traffic impacts and promote the use of alternate modes of transportation • Any specific issues that require special consideration such as pedestrian circulation, access, parking and on-site circulation
The content and level o f analysis necessary to evaluate a project will vary and are dependent on the scope of the development proposal and location within the City.

VMT Assessment Requirements
Present the Project VMT per service population (population and employment) for all an alysis scenarios and the Project effect on VMT for all analysis scenarios . Data should be presented in

Page 30 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 636 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
18 tabular format. If the project meets the criteria for screening from project-generated VMT analysis, this should be documented. All VMT impacts should b e identified in accordance with the VMT Impact Thresholds described above. Proposed VMT mitigation measures should be identified.

Page 31 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 637 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
19 Attachments

Page 32 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 638 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
20 Attachment A: Project Scoping Form
This scoping form shall be completed and submitted to the City of Hemet to assist in identifying infrastructure improvements that may be required to support traffic from the proposed project.

Project Identification:

Case Number:

Related Cases:

SP No.

EIR No.

GPA No.

CZ No.

Project Name:

Project Address:

Project Opening
Year:

Project
Description:

Consultant: Developer:

Name:

Address:

Telephone:

Fax/Email:

Trip Generation Information:

Trip Generation Data Source:

Current General Plan Land Use:

Proposed General Plan Land Use:

Current Zoning:

Proposed Zoning:

Page 33 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 639 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
21 Existing Trip Generation Proposed Trip Generation
In Out Total In Out Total
AM Trips
PM Trips

Trip Internalization: Yes No ( % Trip Discount)
Pass-By Allowance: Yes No ( % Trip Discount)

Potential VMT Screening Checks
Is your project screened from specific analyses (see Page 11 of the guidelines related to LOS assessment and Pages 24-26). This requirement is for project’s requiring VMT assessment for CEQA only.

Is the project screened from VMT assessment? Yes No
VMT screening justification (see Pages 24-26 of the guidelines):

VMT Analysis Scoping
For projects that are not screened, identify the following:
• Travel Demand Forecasting Model Used
• Attach WRCOG Screening VMT Assessment output or describe why it is not appropriate for use
• Attach proposed Model Land Use Inputs and Assumed Conversion Factors (attach) Signatures
TIA Preparer: City (Approved by):

Page 34 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 640 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
22 Attachment B: Detailed VMT Forecasting Information
RIVTAM and RIVCOM are trip-based models that generate daily person trip -ends for each TAZ across various trip purposes (Home-Based Work (HBW), Home-Based Other (HBO), and Non-Home Based ( NHB) based on population, household, and employment variables. Production and attraction trip-ends are separately calculated for each zone, and , generally, production trip-ends are generated by residential land uses and attraction trip -ends are generated by non -residential land uses. During the final assignment loop of a model run, the total trips between each TAZ are converted to the origin-destination trip matrix, which are used to estimate total VMT. A challenge using this approach to estimat ing VMT is production and attraction trip -ends are not distinguishable after the PA to OD conversion process and trip purposes are not maintained after the mode choice step.

Production-Attraction VMT Forecasting Instructions
This approach uses standard RIVTAM or RIVCOM output files and requires minimal custom calculations. It is based on a regional MPO trip-based model with peak (PK) and off-peak (OP) skims and person trip PA matrices.
• Calculate custom vehicle trip PA matrices from PK and OP person trip matrices o Keep trip purposes and modes separate
o Use average vehicle occupancy rates for drive-alone and shared ride trips • Use the final congested drive -alone PK and OP skim matrices to estimate trip length between zones
• Multiply the skim matrices by vehicle trip matrices to estimate VMT • Sum the PK and OP results to estimate daily VMT and aggregate mode trip purpose and mode
• Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs using marginal totals:
o Residential (home-based) - row total
o Office (home-based work) - column total
Origin-Destination VMT Forecasting Instructions
This approach will calculate total Origin/Destination (OD) VMT using standard RIVTAM or RIVCOM model output files. The OD method for calculating total VMT includes all vehicle trips that start in a specific traffic analysis zone, and all vehicle trips that end in a specific traffic analysis zone . The OD trip matrix shall be multiplied by the final assignment skims . The major steps of this approach are listed as follows:
• Re-skim final loaded congested networks and adjust the external skim for each mode and time period to account for truncated trips
• Multiply appropriate distance skim matrices by OD trip matrices to estimate VMT by time period

Page 35 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 641 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
23 • Sum matrices by time period and mode to calculate daily automobile VMT • Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs
Appropriateness Checks
The number of vehicle trips from the total VMT estimation should match as closely as possible with the results from the traditional model process. The estimated results should be checked against the results from a full model run to understand the degree of accuracy. Note that these process es should include IX/XI trips (trips with origins or destinations outside of the model roadway network), truck trips, or special generator trips (airport, seaport, stadium, etc.).

When calculating VMT for comparison at the study area, citywide, or regional geography, the same methodology that was used to estimate project -specific VMT should be used. The VMT for these comparisons can be easily calculated by aggregating the row or column totals for all zones that are within the desired geography.

Page 36 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 642 of 1916 ends

DRAFT City of Hemet TIA Guidelines
May 2021
24 Attachment C: City of Hemet SB 743 Implementation
Mitigation and TDM Strategy Assessment
Memorandum

Page 37 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 643 of 1916 ends

C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-1
Hemet recognizes the
benefit that its traditional
grid street network provides
in furthering modern
environmental “Smart
Growth” and “Complete
Streets” efforts and values
the walkable residential
character provided by that
grid. Hemet desires to meet
environmental and acc ess
challenges of the future
through expanded
opportunities and
innovations in mobility
choices.

CHAPTER 4 CIRCULATION

Aerial View of Hemet (2008)

he Circulation Element establishes standards for the movement of people, goods, and services throughout the planning area and proposes concepts, strategies, and implementation measures necessary to support development of the land uses described in the Land Use Element. This element also focuses on new and innovative transportation concepts that balance the need for both efficiency and cost effectiveness in the development of local and regional circulation systems. The Circulation Element describes how Hemet residents and local employees move through the planning area and beyond using automobiles, public transit, bicycles, and pedestrian facilities..

4.1 SCOPE AND CONTEX T
Hemet has an extensive network of transportation facilities and mobility options to convey people and goods safely and efficiently. The City seeks to reduce traffic congestion and improve roadway safety, to provide enhanced travel alternatives to the automobile, and to provide better connections to regional travel routes. Accomplishing these objectives requires effective land use planning, roadway improvements, transportation system and demand management, and regional coordination. Hemet’s transportation plannin g policies acknowledge that roadway construction alone cannot solve circulation problems; that is, the City cannot build its way out of traffic congestion. The policies and programs in this element emphasize the need to improve existing roadways to their f ull capacity , reconfigure existing access options , and increase transit and alternative transportation modes of travel in addition to pursuing construction of new roads.

The City aims to create corridors of higher intensity land uses to support the future development and use of public transit, including extension of the Metrolink rail system to Hemet. Toward this end, the Circulation and Land Use Elements attempt to organi ze planned land uses and transportation modes in a manner that integrates residential and commercial land uses to reduce both the number and length of vehicle trips.

Page 38 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 644 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-2
The State of California General Plan Guidelines require that the Circulation Element fulfill the following objectives:
❖ Ensure that anticipated growth and changes to land use dictated by the Land Use Element are supported by the transportation and circulation planning in this element. ❖ Address relevant issues relating to the adequacy of “major th oroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities.” ❖ Identify circulation problems related to these facilities in the early stages and resolve them in local goals and policies without costly delays.
❖ Furthermore, Assembly Bill (AB) 1358 (2007) requires that the Circulation Element provide accommodations for “complete streets” that promote usability of streets for all persons rather than just motorists.
❖ Pursuant to Senate Bill 743, traffic impact analysis for CEQA c ompliance shall be based on Vehicle Mile of Travel (VMT).

The state also recommends that the Circulation Element:
❖ consider the “preservation of transportation corridors for future system improvements” and ❖ address consistency among state, regional, and lo cal transportation plans to better resolve circulation issues.

This element provides the context from which to enhance the multiuse trails and bikeway system, offering both recreational and commuting opportunities to City residents. These enhancements also relate to the Land Use and Open Space and Conservation Elements because the trail system supporting walking and bicycling, both of which reduce demands placed on the automobile transportation system, improve air quality and provide alternative connections between land uses.

According to state planning law, each element of the General Plan must be internally and externally consistent. All elements of the General Plan are interrelated to a degree, and certain goals and policies of each element may also addre ss issues that are the primary subjects of other elements.

The integration of overlapping issues throughout the General Plan elements provides a strong basis for implementation of plans and programs and achievement of community goals. The Circulation Element relates most closely to the Community Infrastructure and Services, Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Recreation and Trails, and Art and Culture Elements.

The Land Use and Community Design Elements address land use patterns for existing and undeveloped areas, along with alternative methods to increase mobility based on land use patterns.

The uses identified on the Land Use Map provide the basis for determining future circulation needs. The Open Space and Conservation Element addresses energy conservation and efficiency.

The Community Services and Infrastructure Element addresses infrastructure, including energy transmission lines, water, sewage, and storm drainage. Some policies in this element address trails and pathways, which are closely related to the provision of parks and open space addressed in the Recreation and Trails Element. Air quality (a topic also found within the Open Space and Conservation Element) is integrally associated with transportation and circulation patterns. The goals and policies within the Open Space and Conservation Element rely on supporting policies and plans found within this element. Housing and other land uses rely on the circulation system.

Roads, transit, and other transportation systems are essential for business, recreation, and daily life.

Page 39 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 645 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-3

4.2 ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES
The results of the Circulation Element Update Transportation Study in conjunction with community input during the General Plan preparation process identified existing challenges and future opportunities regarding circulation and mobility within the City and Planning Area. These issues and opportunities are identified below.

4.2.1 TRADITIONAL GRID ROADWAY SYSTEM
Hemet’s downtown district and surrounding
residential areas developed around a
traditional grid system of streets. Now called
a “Neo-traditional” grid pattern, Hemet has
what many cities desire: a circulation system
that not only accommodates cars but
facilitates pedestrian movement and links
neighborhoods with nearby shopping ,
consistent with the concepts embodied
under the state’s “complete streets
program”. A primary issue however, is the
fact that recent development trends favor
cul-de-sacs and curvilinear street designs ,
which minimizes through traffic on
residential streets. To address this issue, the
circulation system continues to provide for
the City’s traditional grid system and
pedestrian connectivity where practical, with deviations typically occurring only where there are physical constraints.

4.2.2 IMPROVED ACCESS TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Hemet is currently served by an older highway system developed for an agricultural community.

This is shown on Figure 1.1, the “Regional Context Map.” Newer and faster systems have been developed to the west and north o f the City but as of 2010, there is a deficit of regional transportation facilities directly serving the City and integrating Hemet with the greater Riverside County area. This connection to regional transportation systems, both vehicular and rail, is critical to Hemet’s economic future and its ability to pr ovide an expanded employment base for its citizens. Both City officials and regional agencies have recognized this issue and have focused on bringing regional transportation facilities to Hemet, which will include:
❖ Realigned State Route 79 The City of Hemet has been an active partner with the Project Design Team (PDT) for the realignment of State Route (SR) 79. The PDT included partners from the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), Californi a Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Federal Highway Administration, and Riverside County. The final route for the SR 79 realignment was selected and the associated environmental impact report was certified by the RCTC on December 8, 2016 . SR 79 will provide critical north/south connectivity to Interstate 10 (I-10) to the north and the Murrieta, Temecula and French Valley areas to the south.
❖ Mid-County Parkway The Mid-County Parkway (MCP) is a proposed 16-mile transportation corridor that will rel ieve traffic congestion for east -west travel in western Riverside County between the San Jacinto Valley and Perris areas and help address future transportation needs through 2035. While not directly within City limits, the MCP will provide critical east -west circulation capacity and serves as an integral link to SR 79, Sanderson Avenue, and Ramona

Page 40 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 646 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-4
Expressway. The construction of the MCP will also serve to off -load some of the existing conjestion on Florida Avenue (Hwy 74), which is the primary east-west corridor in Hemet. ❖ Future Metrolink Stations Currently, the RCTC owns the right-of-way along the railroad spur coming into Hemet from Perris and Riverside for a future Metrolink route. The City’s General Plan shows two Metrolink stations, one for the future West Hemet Business Park/Mixed Use area and one in downtown Hemet. The City has recognized the critical role Metrolink plays for the region and has incorporated numerous goals and policies throughout the General Plan e ncouraging development of the stations and development of transit - oriented design near the future stations. The City will need to aggressively pursue funding for these facilities in conjunction with RCTC , recognizing that funding resources will become increasingly competitive in the future.
❖ Completion of Regional Roads to and through Hemet Two major east-west roads run to and through Hemet (Domenigoni Parkway and Florida Avenue). Major north -south streets include Warren Road, Sanderson Avenue, State Street, and San Jacinto Street. These roads are only partially completed and/or require additional rights-of-way. This General Plan anticipates completion of the major roads to and through Hemet, and recognizes that interagency coordination with Riverside County and the City of San Jacinto will be critical to ensure timely completion of the regional road network.

4.2.3 ROADWAY CONNECTIVITY CONSTRAINTS
Hemet’s roadway system is well developed; however, some connectivity gaps and design issues result in unnecess ary traffic delays. For example, Devonshire Avenue is an important east -west street providing an intracity function. However, Devonshire Avenue does not connect State Street to San Jacinto Street because an existing public school campus is blocking through access, resulting in indirect access to the hospital from the west. Additionally, in many areas, right -of-way is not readily available to widen streets to accommodate additional traffic volume. The lack of established turning mechanisms, such as striping, traffic signals, and turn lanes, at critical intersections also results in traffic delays. However, these issues are not insurmountable. The City of Hemet has been working with the Hemet Unified School District to study the feasibility of moving the schoo l to permit the extension of Devonshire. Streets and intersections can be widened as part of an ongoing capital improvement program (CIP). Furthermore, the Circulation Element provides clear goals, policies, and implementation programs pertaining to this issue resulting in a functional circulation system.

4.2.4 EXPANSION OF ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS
The City already has in place an extensive alternative transportation network, including the existing rail line, bike paths, and the airport. Opportunities exist in the future to expand these facilities and enhance their utilization. For example, the railroad line is projected to accommodate the future Metrolink line connecting Hemet with the Cities of Perris, Riverside, and Los Angeles. Bike paths will be added to the network already in place and the existing street system can either be directly used or retrofitted to use neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs).

4.2.5 TRAFFIC CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
For most arterials, Hemet’s circulation net work experiences an acceptable level of traffic flow.

However, Florida Ave nue experiences congestion at key intersections such as at Sanderson Avenue, State Street and San Jacinto Street. Adding to the traffic delays are the number of signalized intersections along Florida Avenue. Enhanced intersection geometrics such as adding turn lanes, and upgraded and synchronized signal phasing will improve overall traffic flow. The City will need to implement new technologies and employ creative solutions such as

Page 41 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 647 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-5
Transportation Demand Strategies (TDM), to ensure that the roadway system is efficient, safe, and improves mobility for all users including vehicles, transit, pedestrians, and bicyclists.

4.2.6 CAL-TRANS CONTROLLED STATE HIGHWAYS
The California Departmen t of Transportation, or Cal -Trans, has jurisdiction over the two state highways that transect Hemet: Hwy 74 (Florida Avenue) and Hwy 79 (various roadways). The future realignment of Hwy 79 will essentially mitigate the current circulation issues associated with this roadway. However, there are no plans to realign Hwy 74 to another route and as such, any modifications to the right of way for this roadway, including driveway access, signals, medians, and signage needs to be approved by Cal -Trans. Some cities within the region have taken over the maintenance responsibility – and thus gained local control - for portions of state highways. This has allowed greater flexibility and a less time -consuming process in implementing right of way improvements. The City of Hemet may also consider discussing with Cal-trans the opportunities for taking over jurisdiction of portions of Hwy 74.

4.2.7 HEMET-RYAN AIRPORT
The Hemet-Ryan Airport has provided aviation services for over half a century. As aviation needs change, however, so will the need for improvements to Hemet-Ryan Airport. The existing Hemet- Ryan Airport Master Plan adopted in 2004 is currently being updated and a proposed new plan is anticipated to be adopted by the County of Riverside the future. The new Layout Plan is proposed to include a 500 foot easterly extension of Runway 5-23 to allow for increased takeoff capacity to the west. As is the case in many cities where expansion of airports is contemplated, the obligation to protect residents from airport expan sion issues, such as noise, must be factored into the discussion. The City of Hemet has traditionally supported the Hemet -Ryan Airport and this General Plan provides goals and policies continuing that support, but tempered with the realization that airport expansions are a complex and dynamic issue and that airport expansion should not be detrimental to the existing community and the necessary provision of surrounding circulation and infrastructure systems.

4.3 RELATED PROGRAMS , PLANS , AND REGULATIONS
Transportation planning and management requires cooperation and coordination among many state, county, and regional agencies. Relevant agencies include Caltrans, Riverside County, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Western Riverside County Council of Governments (WRCOG), and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

These agencies have federal and state mandates to adopt transportation -related programs that affect Hemet (and other jurisdictions throughout the area). Working together, agencies can address the physical infrastructure needed to support regional demands and ensure that convenient alternative transportation modes provide for an integrated, multi -modal approach to addressing traffic problems. The following plans affect the coordination of transportation planning efforts in the City of Hemet:

Regional Transportation Plan The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is a component of the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide prepared by SCAG to address regional congestion and transportation issues. The RTP has been developed with active participation from local agencies throughout the region, elected officials, the business community, community groups, private institutions, and citizens. It is a multi -modal, long -range planning document prepared in coordination with federal, state, and other regional, subregional, and local agencies throughout southern California. The RTP includes programs and policies for congestion management, transit, bicycles and pedestrians, roadways, freight, and transportation finance. The RTP is prepared every 3 years, and reflects the future horizon based on a 20-year projection of needs. The RTP's primary use is as a regional, long-range plan for federally funded transportation projects. It also serves as a

Page 42 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 648 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-6
comprehensive, coordinated transportation plan for all jurisdictions within the region. Each agency responsible for transportation, such as local cities, the County, and Caltrans, has different transportation implementation responsibilities under the RTP. The RTP relies on the plans and policies governing circulation and transportation in each County and City to identify the region's future multi-modal transportation system.

Riverside County Integrated Project/Community and Env ironmental Transportation Acceptability Process Western Riverside County is projected to grow from a current population of about 1.2 million to 2 million in 2020. In an effort to improve the quality of life for current and future residents, Riverside Count y, RCTC, and SCAG embarked on a planning process to determine future placement of buildings, roads and open spaces within the County. This process was named the Riverside County Integrated Project and resulted in three interrelated plans: a General Plan for land use and housing, a multiple-species habitat conservation plan to determine open spaces and conservation areas, and the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP), which identifies improvements for highways and transit systems.

The integration of these distinct planning efforts will improve their ultimate effectiveness.

The main goals of CETAP are to: (1) identify and set aside areas for major transportation facilities; (2) ensure that transportation infrastructure will b e in place to foster the economic development of Riverside County; and (3) provide access to schools, jobs, shopping and other daily activities.

One major component of the CETAP was to identify a location for the SR 79 realignment through the communities of Hemet and San Jacinto. Other goals include providing expanded rail service and express bus service throughout Riverside County. Decisions reached through the CETAP will affect transportation facilities and opportunities within Hemet.

Riverside County and City of San Jacinto Circulation Elements The Riverside County Circulation Element forms part of the County’s general plan. This element identifies the system of regional arterials and bikeways in the community of Winchester and other unincorporated portions of the Planning Area. The San Jacinto Circulation Element identifies arterial roadways and bikeways in areas adjoining the north side of the City of Hemet.

In developing the Circulation Plan, the City coordinated with both Riverside County and the City of San Jacinto to ensure connectivity with the adjoining circulation networks as shown in their respective general plans.

Riverside County Congestion Management Plan Urbanized areas such as Riverside County are required to adopt a congestion management program (CMP). The Riverside County CMP is updated every 2years, pursuant to Proposition 111 (1990). The goals of the CMP are to reduce traffic congestion, to improve air quality, and to provide a coordination mechanism between land development and transportation improvement decisions. The CMP is administered by RCTC. In compliance with the CMP, the City is required to maintain minimum level of service (LOS) standards identified in the General Plan and require traffic impact assessments or studies for development projects.

Measure A Measure A, Riverside County's half-cent sales tax for transportation, was adopted by voters in 1988 and extended in 2002. It will continue to fund transportation improvements through 2039. Measure A funds a wide variety of transportation projects and services throughout the county. RCTC is responsible for administering the program. Measure A dollars are spent in accordance with a voter-approved expenditure plan that was adopted as part of the 1988 election.

Among the programmed projects for Measure A is the realignment of SR 79.

Page 43 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 649 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-7
City of Hemet Measure C On June 7, 1988, Hemet voters approved a measure to require updating the City’s General Plan to incorporate performance measures related to traffic, drainage facilities, water storage and distribution facilities, park and recreational facilities, police services, fire services, and sanitary sewers. These performance standards were incorporated into the 1992 General Plan as a component of the Public Services and Facilities Element. They are incorporated into the various goals, policies, and implementation measures within General Plan 2030 and are attached as Appendix G.

Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee When voters approved the extension of Measure A in 2002, they also approved the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Under the TUMF, developers in western Riverside County pay a fee to fund transportation projects. A network of TUMF projects has been developed and includes projects in the City of Hemet. The Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) was designated as program administrator for the TUMF program. As administrator, WRCOG receives all fees generated from the TUMF that are collected by local jurisdictions. WRCOG invests, accounts for, and spends the fee in accordance with the TUMF ordinance, the administrative plan, and applicable state laws. Local jurisdictions implement the projects approved as part of the TUMF.

State Rout e 79 Realignment Project SR 79 is a regional roadway that currently follows a circuitous north-south route through the central areas of Temecula, Murrieta, Winchester, Hemet, and San Jacinto. SR 79 has historically formed the backbone of development in Hem et and provides the City with valuable regional connections. The current SR 79 alignment within Hemet extends from Domenigoni Parkway to Gilman Springs Road, a distance of approximately 18 miles.

Several factors have contributed to circulation deficiencies on SR 79 between Domenigoni Parkway and Gilman Springs Road. The current alignment is ineffective because it does not provide a direct regional north-south route; rather, it directs traffic through downtown Hemet and across numerous access points, resulti ng in traffic delay. Also, SR 79 does not meet commercial large-truck roadway requirements, forcing such trucks onto local roads, creating congestion in Hemet. The many businesses, residences, and other facilities located in downtown Hemet generate many vehicle trips. As a result, east-west and north-south through traffic is mixed with local traffic attempting to access the numerous businesses in Hemet, resulting in traffic congestion.

Consequently, to avoid these through -town delays, regional traffic is av oiding SR 79 and using parallel arterials, such as Sanderson Avenue and Warren Road.

The existing SR 79 alignment has inadequate capacity to accommodate the regional and local travel demand associated with projected growth in western Riverside County. Heme t needs a more effective connection to improve roadway efficiency, safety, and vehicle capacity. In recognition of these factors, in 2016 the RCTC adopted a plan to realign SR 79, as shown in General Plan Roadway Circulation Master Plan. The realignment, which will run diagonally between Domenigoni Parkway at Winchester Road and Gilman Springs Road , is the City’s preferred alignment location. It will separate local and regional traffic by transforming SR 79 into a regional highway that redirects heavy reg ional traffic off of local and residential roads. It w ill provide regional motorists a direct, north -south route and improve mobility and safety on Hemet's local streets.

Capital Improvement Program The CIP is a planning tool used to coordinate the financing and scheduling of major City projects, including transportation improvements. Not all projects included in the CIP have budget approval. The City’s CIP is revised on an annual basis to meet changing needs, priorities, and financial conditions. Major fu nding sources in Hemet include the General Fund, Redevelopment Funds, and Enterprise Funds. Sales tax is the largest single revenue source in the General Fund. Other funding sources include development fees, property taxes, sales tax, and the gas tax.

Page 44 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 650 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-8
Vehicle Trip Reduction Program for Employment The City’s Trip Reduction Program is applicable to new employment-generating developments that could employ 100 or more persons.

Smaller employers may participate. New developments must incorporate facilities and/o r programs in their development plans sufficient to reduce work -related trips by 12 percent from the ordinarily expected number of trips related to the project, based on methodologies and standards established by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, SCAG, a nd/or SCAQMD. The Trip Reduction Program implements the Model Mobile Source Reduction Program and allows the City to receive revenues from state vehicle registration fees to administer programs to reduce air pollution.

Western Riverside Council of Governme nts Non -Motorized Transportation Plan The Western Riverside Council of Governments Non-Motorized Transportation Plan provides a system of regional bicycling and walking routes throughout the County, typically shown as regional routes between subregional networks within cities and as the portions of those subregional networks that serve as regional routes. This is a necessary tool to ensure that Hemet’s network connects to the larger regional network and to ensure that the portions of Hemet’s network that serve a regional function are consistent in capacity and design to the larger, regional network. The nonmotorized transportation plan for the Hemet area is discussed in section 4.7.1.

Hemet-Ryan Airport Master Plan The Hemet-Ryan Airport is located in the City of Hemet. It is owned by Riverside County and operated by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. The Hemet -Ryan Airport Master Plan was adopted in 2004 and a new layout plan has recently been proposed, and is anticipated to be adopted by the County of Riverside in the future.

The Master Plan reflects anticipated development of the airport, including runways, taxiways, and associated land areas for both the improvements and safety zones, along with improvements in airport facilities, hangar and tie-down areas, and public access. A 500 foot easterly extension of Runway 5-23 is anticipated in the new layout plan which would facilitate take-offs in the westerly direction.

California AB 1358: The Complete Streets Act (2013)
AB 1358, the Complete Streets Act, requires cities and counties to identify how the jurisdiction will provide for the routine accommodation of all users of the roadway, including motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, individuals with disabilities, seniors, a nd users of public transportation.

Complete streets help facilitate a variety of important community benefits. Section 4.4.7 of this element identifies these benefits and how Hemet’s network meets the requirements of the Act.

California SB 743: Measuring Traffic Impacts Using VMT (2019)

SB 743 requires VMT be utilized as the metric for determining transportation impacts in CEQA.

All development projects in California will be required to to complete VMT assessments , consistent with SB 743 or City Traff ic Guidelines, and incorporate TDM as mitigation measures as needed. The City of Hemet adopted thresholds of significance related to VMT in 2020.

SB 743 no longer allows LOS to be utilized to determine transportation impacts in CEQA.

However, LOS can still be required as policy general plans and used in cities to size the circulation network.

Page 45 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 651 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-9

California Bicycle Transportation Act
The intent of the California Bicycle Transportation Act is to design and develop a transportation system that achieves the functional commuting needs of the employee, student, business person, and shopper; ensures the physical safety of the bicyclist and bicyclists’ property; and accommodates bicyclists of all ages and skills. The California Streets and Highways Code spells out required components of bicycle plans each jurisdiction must include to be eligible for Caltrans Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) funds. Local governments seeking these funds must have their plan approved by the regional funding agency.

The City of Hemet General Plan Traffic Study specifically addresses a number of the requirements of the California Bicycle Transportation Act in Chapter 5 of this report. Key routes are developed to meet the needs of the users outlined in the Bicycle Transportation Act: employees, students, business people and shoppers.

The plan also focuses on the safety of bicyclists by providing design classifications and best practices related to street network configurations. The use of on- and off-street facilities provides a variety of route configurations that may accommodate bicyclists of all different ages and skills at different locations throughout the City. As the City continues planning for the future, it is recommended that additional components of a complete bicycle plan be developed in order to be eligible for BTA funds.

California AB 32: The Global Warming Solutions Act (2006) AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act, establishes the first -in-the-world comprehensive program of regulatory and market mechanisms to achieve real, quantifiable, cost -effective reductions in greenhouse gasses (GHG). AB 32 makes the California Air Resources Board (CARB) responsible for monitoring and reducing GHG emissions and continues the existing Climate Action Team to coordinate statewide efforts. This landmark legislation calls for a reduction of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and will require the state to cut emissions by 30 percent over projected levels. Reduction measures proposed to meet the 2020 target levels are to be adopted by the start of 2011.

The Circulation Plan defines a network of bicycle routes, transit, neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) and pedestrian accommodations that encourages Hemet residents to utilize modes of transportation other than the automobile. The Plan provides a network to connect to regional bicycle and pedestrian trails from the Western Riverside County Non -Motorized Transportation Plan (Urban Crossroads, Inc., June 2010). The Non - Motorized Transportation Plan evaluates demand for such facilities. The Circulation Element also describes public transit, and NEV connectivity to major employment and activity centers to facilitate access to these destinations without the use of an automobile.

California SB 375 (2008)
SB 375 requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to set regional targets for years 2020 and 2035 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from passenger vehicles. The targets apply to regions in the state covered by the 18 metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)––SCAG is the MPO that represents the City of Hemet and other parts of western Riverside County. SB 375 provides emissions -reducing goals regions can plan for, integrates planning activities, and provides incentives for local governments an d developers to follow new, conscientiously planned growth patterns. Reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is one strategy MPOs can employ to achieve these targets.

The intent of SB 375, and its successor SB 743, are intended is to reduce VMT by reshaping the face of California’s communities into more sustainable, walkable environments with alternative transportation options and increased quality of life. SB 375 provides incentives for creating attractive, walkable, sustainable communities and revitalized existing ones. SB 375 and SB 743 It also encourage TDM measures for the development of more alternative transportation options, including well-planned and -maintained pedestrian and bicycle routes, and other trip reduction strategies.

Page 46 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 652 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-10
The Circulation Plan provides a framework for key routes and alternative transportation facilities that will enhance connectivity within the City of Hemet and between nearby jurisdictions. The proposed plan enables travel by various modes to major activity areas and large employment centers. It also serves existing and future planned transit facilities, including potential future Metrolink stations.

4. 4 ROADWAY CIRCULATION

4.4.1 MEASURING TRAFFIC FLOW
Roadway networks must be regularly evaluated to ensure they are moving vehicles efficiently and maintaining adequate capacity to support future growth. Evaluating the ability of the circulation system to serve residents and businesses in Hemet requires establishing performance criteria. Performance cri teria have a policy component that establishes a desired Level of Service (LOS), and a technical component that specifies how traffic forecast data can be used to measure criteria achievement. Within the Circulation Element, Volume -to-capacity (V/C) ratios are used to establish LOS categories describing the performance of roadways and access points throughout the community. The City of Hemet values LOS as a tool to manage congestion and size infrastructure , and requires VMT for CEQA analysis.

Volume-to-Capacity Ratio This ratio (i.e., a ratio between traffic volume and theoretical capacity of the roadway) is used to measure the performance of roadway facilities. Volume is established either by a traffic count (in the case of current volumes) or by a forecast for a future point in time.

Capacity refers to the vehicle carr ying ability of a roadway at free -flow speed and is a critical component of roadway design. For example, a roadway that carries 16,000 vehicles per day, with the capacity to accommodate 20,000 vehicles per day at free-flow speed, has a V/C of 0.80.

Level of Service LOS describes the efficiency and quality of traffic operations. LOS is a tool used to describe the operating characteristics of the street system in terms of the level of congestion or delay experienced by vehicles. Service levels range from A through F, with each level defined by a Table 4.1
Level of Service Definitions for Intersections
Level of
Service
Volume-to-
Capacity
Ratio
Description
A 0.00-0.60 Free Flow/Insignificant Delays: No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication.

B 0.61-0.70 Stable Operation/Minimal Delays: An occasional approach phase is fully utilized. Many drivers feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehicles.

C 0.71-0.80 Stable Operation/Acceptable Delays: Major approach phases fully utilized. Most driver s feel somewhat restricted.

D 0.81-0.90 Approaching Unstable/Tolerable Delays: Drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication. Queues may develop but dissipate rapidly, without excessive delays.

E 0.91-1.00 Unstable Operation/Significant Delays: Volumes at or near capacity. Vehicles may wait through several signal cycles. Long queues form upstream from intersection.

F N/A Forced Flow/Excessive Delays: Represents jammed conditions. Intersection operates below capacity with low volumes. Queues may block upstream intersections.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Special Report No. 209, Washington DC, 2000.

Page 47 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 653 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-11
range of V/C ratios, as shown in Table 4.1 . LOS A, B, and C are considered good operating conditions, with only minor delays being experienced by motorists. LOS D represents operating conditions where drivers occasionally have to wait through more than one signal cycle to proceed through the intersection. LOS E is considered a near-capacity condition, and LOS F represents an oversaturated condition with long delays.

Level of Service Standards Various LOS policy standar ds have been established to evaluate observed traffic conditions, future development plans, and circulation system modifications. At the local level, the City of Hemet has established LOS D as the lowest acceptable LOS for peak- hour intersection movements and LOS C as the lowest acceptable LOS for roadway segment operations. The City has not adopted an LOS standard for unsignalized intersections. Performance of unsignalized intersections is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. At the regional planning level, Riverside County’s congestion management plan (CMP) specifies LOS E as the operating standard for roadways and intersections on the CMP highway system.

The City has also established additional thresholds for project impacts through VMT assessments and City Traffic Guidelines that go beyond acceptable operational LOS analysis in order to address direct project impacts on roadway capacity. For purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), project impacts shall be measured based on compliance with SB 743. that increase V/C by .01 or more on affected roadway segments at intersections already experiencing or projected to experience LOS E or F conditions are considered to create potentially significant impacts, and a traffic analysi s report and mitigation measures are required. T his requirement is designed to reduce the occurrence of both roadway congestion and underfunded improvements.

The City accepts a Level of Service below “D” for roadways and intersections at Florida and Sanderson Avenues, and at Devonshire and Sanderson Avenues, TDM measures are recommended as opposed to infrastructure improvements in order to most effectively and efficiently manage congestion within the constrained roadway network. where Level of Service is affected by delays at Florida and Sanderson Avenues. The City has recognized that certain segments and intersections would exceed Level of Service “D” as early as 1992 during a comprehensive General Plan update. These segments included portions of Florida A venue, Stetson Avenue, and Sanderson Avenue. Measure C incorporated these problematic roads in the measure language, and portions of Florida, Sanderson and Stetson do not need to comply with Measure C’s standard. The land uses and circulation system in this General Plan have resolved the service level problems identified for Stetson Avenue; however, Florida Avenue and Sanderson Avenue would still operate below Level of Service “D” with implementation of the General Plan.

Where traffic conditions warrant, such as The primary reasons for exceeding level of service “D” in the vicinity of Florida Avenue and Sanderson Avenue , TDM measures are recommended as opposed to infrastructure improvements in order to most effectively and efficiently manage congestion within the constrained roadway network. shall be applied as needed. include closely- spaced traffic signals along Florida Avenue, through -traffic slowed by left turns into commercial driveways on Florida Avenue, and a lack of available right-of-way to widen streets. Over the years, businesses have been built along Florida Avenue, limiting the possibility for roadway widening.

Widening could only occur if those businesses are acquired through imminent domain and demolished. The City believes that the costs of imminent domain and demolition of existing business exceeds the benefits of slightly better capacity at these few select intersections.

4.4.2 IMPROVEMENTS TO TRAFFIC FLOW
To maximize the efficiency of its circulation system, the City has determined where physical improvements to the circulation infrastructure can be made to expand capacity and increase traffic

Page 48 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 654 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-12
flow. There are three basic methods to reduce traffic congestion: reduce traffic demand, increase roadway capacity and efficiency, or spread dem and to off -peak hours. All methods are used to improve transportation planning as a component of the Circulation Element and in the recommended implementation programs. Reducing demand involves encouraging divers to use alternative modes of transportation such as transit, bicycling, walking for nearby trips or participating in carpools/vanpools. Increasing capacity involves adding more lanes, roadways, and increasing intersection turning movements and efficiency. Spreading demand includes the use of alternative work schedules, and locating commercial, employment, educational and recreational facilities in close proximity to residential areas.

To maximize the overall efficiency of the roadway system, the City will support the following measures:
❖ coordinate traffic signal timing and spacing,
❖ optimize intersection capacity and turning movements; ❖ discourage on-street parking along most secondary, major, and arterial streets, and expressways In newly developing areas, parking will generally not be accommodated o n any master planned street or road. The exception is for streets designated as Divided Secondary, where project designs may include on-street parking in conjunction with parks or similar amenities.
❖ explore ways to reduce the demand for vehicular transportation, specifically through the provision and maintenance of bike lanes, bikeways, trails, and pedestrian routes; ❖ promote the extension of the Metrolink commuter rail line to Downtown and West Hemet, and explore additional opportunities for light rail, trolley systems, bus rapid transit, and local transit routes;
❖ accommodate Neighborhood Electric Vehicles ( NEVs) where practical and encourage additional regional transit services and support facilities; ❖ implement the City’s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance (Chapter 30, Article 3 of the City of Hemet Municipal Code) which specifies a variety of techniques available to employers with 100 or more employees to advance the goals of efficient ly utilizing the existing and planned transportation system and reducing vehicle emissions.

TDM strategies are designed to encourage individuals to use alternatives to the single - occupant automobile. Some examples of TDM strategies are carpools and vanpool s, public transit, nonmotorized modes, congestion pricing, and providing the public with reliable and timely traveler information.
❖ encourage and implement designated Mixed-use districts to provide an integrated mix of residential, commercial, office, and recreational/cultural land uses to reduce vehicle miles and promote walkability.

Trip Reduction Strategies Table 4.2 below summarizes the potential benefit of the various trip reduction strategies outlined with the Circulation Element, and the percentage of vehicle miles that are projected to be reduced with the implementation of each strategy.

Page 49 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 655 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-13

Table 4.2
Trip Reduction Strategies
Measure Applicability VMT Reduction Range
Mixed Use Areas
Designated mixed use
areas in the City
anticipated to include
residential, office, and
retail uses
9 – 30%
Providing Pedestrian
Facilities
Citywide 0 – 2%
Implement
Neighborhood Electric
Vehicle (NEV) Network
Citywide

0.5 – 12.7%
Incorporate Bike Lanes /
Increase Density
Citywide 0.05 – 0.14%
Increase Transit
Accessibility
Citywide 0.5 – 24.6%
VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled

4.4.3 REGIONAL ROAD CIRCULATION
Mobility in Hemet is directly related to the regional transportation network, because the City lies at the confluence of SR 74 and SR 79. Interstate 215 (I -215) and Interstate 15 (I -15) are located west of Hemet, and. SR 60 and I-10 are located to the north. In addition to these freeways, other connections to the region include the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF Railway) line, which is a freight line used for goods transportation. Hemet is also connected to the region via the RTA bus system. The Metrolink commuter rail system provides public transit access within nearby cities and counties. There is currently no Metrolink service in Hemet ; however, future station locations have been identified for downtown Hemet and to serve the west Hemet area. Figure 1.1 shows Hemet’s regional transportation context.

The City has made substantial efforts in recent years to improve traffic conditions on local roadways and to encourage multi -modal travel options. However, Hemet needs better roadway circulation between residential areas and regional employment and commercial centers and better access to regional transportation systems.

The high levels of pass-through traffic associated with regional development and securing funding sources for circulation improvements are also key concerns. One of the most pertinent regional transportation issue in Hemet is accommodating regional through -traffic originating in nearby communities. Specifically, growth in unincorporated Riverside County could lower the LOS on Hemet’s roadways, and therefore lead to restriction of development within Hemet in order to meet LOS performance criteria. In the past, unchecked regional growth has resulted in unexpected and unplanned traffic congestion on City streets. This regional traffic also includes commer cial truck traffic. Hemet needs a circulation system that routes truck and commercial traffic away from residential streets toward larger expressways and larger arterials.

State Route 79 Another source of regional traffic is SR 79, which is currently routed from Temecula to Beaumont via Winchester Road, Florida Avenue, San Jacinto Avenue, North State Street and Gilman Springs Road, and Lamb Canyon. Florida Avenue is also the route of SR 74 .

SR 79 is proposed to be realigned to include an expressway that diverts from Winchester Road near Domenigoni Parkway, running north -northeast to rejoin existing SR 79 south of Lamb

Page 50 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 656 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-14
Canyon. Currently, motorists bypass the existing SR 79 by using Domenigon i Parkway to join either Warren Road or Sanderson Avenue, which leads directly to Lamb Canyon, avoiding Florida Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. The proposed realignment of SR 79 is one component of improving regional transportation in Hemet.

Many of Hemet's regional and local circulation issues center on existing SR 79’s design, capacity, and alignment deficiencies. Many issues will be resolved with the proposed realignment of SR 79 to a new expressway in the western portion of the planning area, including the provision of a significant opportunity to attract new industries and jobs to the city. The timely construction of this expressway is of critical importance to the City, and needs to be pursued diligently with RCTC and CalTrans.

SR 79 is designed to ultimately be a six lane expressway, although the initial construction is planned to be four lanes within an approximate 230 foot right of way. Approval of the environmental clearance (Final EIR) and the ultimate alignment and design configuration occurred in December 2016. The expressway is projected to be constructed in phases, with construction to commence when funding is obtained. The adopted alignment is shown on the general plan Land Use Map (Figure 2.1) and on the Roadway Circulation Master Plan (Figure 4.1).

Grade separated intersections in Hemet are planned for Florida Avenue, Stetson Avenue, Domenigoni Parkway and Esplanade Avenue.

State Route 74 (Florida Avenue) serves as the only route to the mountain resort areas to the east. With the completion of Domenigoni Parkway, some traffic was diverted in the area west of State Street. However, Florida Avenue serves as the primary arterial street traversing the City from west to east. Further to the north, north of the City of San Jacinto, the Ramona Expressway provides both an east -west route between I -215 and the easternmost portion of Florida Avenue and a northwest route: Gilman Springs Road connects the Ramona Expressway with SR 60.

Thus, only three thoroughfares provide a through, east-west travel route across Hemet and San Jacinto. A future thoroughfare—the Mid-County Parkway—will parallel the Ramona Expressway and add east-west capacity.

Mid-County Parkway The Mid-County Parkway (MCP) is a 16-mile east-west expressway planned to connect I-215 and SR-79. Although the expressway is located north of Hemet, it will provide connections to Warren Road, Sanderson Avenue and Hwy 79. As a major east -west corridor into the San Jacinto Valley, it will also provide for regional connectivity and help reduce future traffic volumes on Florida Avenue.

Page 51 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 657 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-15
Figure 4.1 Roadway Circulation Map

Page 52 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 658 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-16
Back of Figure 4.1

Page 53 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 659 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-17
Stetson Avenue This arterial currently runs east-west through the developed portions of Hemet and the southeast Hemet unincorporated area of the County. Stetson Avenue has been designated as a four -lane route in both the previous City of Hemet and current Riverside County general plans, but is built as a two-lane road in the unincorporated southeast area. This element designates Stetson Avenue as a six-lane arterial route west of Sanderson Avenue to follow the BNSF Railway line and proposes a future Metrolink station near the interchange between future Stetson Avenue and future SR 79. The new West Stetson Avenue is proposed to continue westerly through Menifee and ultimately connect with I -215 at the McCall Boulevard interchange, serving as an additional regional access.

In developing a regional transportation network, Hemet must also consider the relationship between vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. On September 30, 2008, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 375 into law, requiring Metropolitan Planning Organizations, including SCAG, to develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as part of the RTP. As an option, the law authorizes WRCOG and other SCAG subregional agencies to prepare a subregional SCS. The SCS is intended to provide a path to reach the goals of AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which requires the state to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. The SCS is generally defined as a development pattern that meets the state target for reducing GHG emissions, while considering the region's housi ng needs, transportation demands, and protection of resource lands. In concert with developing regional transportation options, Hemet has placed land uses in a manner that reduces the number of home- to-work trips during peak travel hours and implemented TDM programs, which increase average vehicle ridership and shift a portion of such trips to nonpeak hours. There is a particular need to encourage industrial uses and employment opportunities within the City in order to reduce traffic on major roads. Building shopping and employment centers within Hemet’s planning area would reduce the distance that City residents drive to regional shopping and employment centers and would aid the local economy.

4.4.4 LOCAL ROAD CIRCULATION
Hemet’s roadway system is well dev eloped; however some connectivity gaps and design issues result in unnecessary traffic delays. In many areas, right-of-way is not available to widen streets to accommodate additional traffic volume. The provision of expanded turning mechanisms, such as striping, traffic signals, and turn lanes, at critical intersections would alleviate a majority of the traffic delays. Many of Hemet’s local collector streets were developed before the current standards for collector roadways, which creates traffic delay and safety hazards when high -volume traffic comes into contact with residential driveways. Also, minimizing the number of direct access points on Hemet’s major roadway corridors, such as SR 79, would improve traffic delay and safety issues.

Transportation System Management (TSM) and TDM strategies can improve the mobility and efficiency of a circulation system. TSM involves physical improvements to the circulation infrastructure to expand capacity and increase traffic flow, while TDM involves reducing the demand for vehicular transportation. TSM and TDM strategies provide relief from increasing demands for more improvements to transportation facilities. Examples of TSM include synchronizing traffic signals, removing on -street parking on certain roads, and chang ing intersection geometries. Priority should be given to TSM strategies that improve LOS, especially in areas that are fully developed, before more costs and capacity-increasing strategies are employed.

Examples of TDM include making better use of existing roads, reducing auto use in congested areas or peak-hour traffic times, and increasing public transit ridership. The City coordinates TSM and TDM efforts with Riverside County’s CMP.

The local street system serves the community’s primary needs for mobility and access. The City’s arterial/collector roadway network generally corresponds to a one-quarter-mile grid pattern. This

Page 54 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 660 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-18
system emphasizes carrying traffic on a relatively large number of collector streets, rather than concentrating traffic on a small number of high-volume arterials. SR 74 and SR 79 serve local and regional through traffic.

4.4.5 CIRCULATION MASTER PLAN
The City’s existing circulation network consists primarily of roadways. However, transit services, multi-use trails and bikeways, and air traffic at Hemet-Ryan Airport are also used by City residents, but to a lesser extent because of a current lack of multi-modal connections. As shown on Figure

4.1, t he updated Circulation Element provides a framework for a comprehensive multi -modal transportation network and the integration of complete streets.

The Circulation Element goals and policies emphasize:
❖ regional access, particularly a realigned and expanded SR 79; ❖ continuation of the City’s traditional grid street system to provide greater connectivity within the City;
❖ a balance between the provision of street infrastructure and the maintenance of the residential character of neighborhoods;
❖ a recognition of the potential effect of development on the capacity of streets and the need to reduce impacts by promoting alternative development patterns and modes of transportation; and
❖ the value of providing commuter rail, bus, bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian pathways as alternate modes of travel for current and future residents.

The planning horizon for Hemet’s roadway system is 2030. The City’s Roadway Circulation Master Plan (Figure 4.1) has been developed to accommodate anticipated vehicle traffic volumes in 2030.

This plan has been developed in close coordination with land use policies to ensure that traffic generated by new development will not compromise the City’s goal to ensure that intersections and roadway segments operate efficiently.

The map identifies existing and proposed components of the City’s roadway circulation system.

The primary enhancement is the realignment of portions of SR 79. SR 79 currently runs east-west along Florida Avenue concurrent with SR 74 from the west end of the City to San Jacinto Street, where SR 79 turns north. Details describing the SR 79 realignment are provide d in the regional circulation discussion.

Although most of central Hemet is already developed, most remaining developable land is located in the western part of the City , and within the Planning Area . New development in west Hemet will require construction of new roads to provide circulation for future residents and businesses.

Land Use Element policies enabling reuse and redevelopment within established portions of the City, particularly within key roadway corridors, may also necessitate roadway widening a nd intersection enhancements.

The traffic impact analysis prepared for the General Plan Update (Urban Crossroads, 2011 ) determined that the proposed circulation plan and roadway network would accommodate the future traffic demands of the land use plan at build out (2030). Intersections are also projected to operate at acceptable levels of service with the exception of two existing intersections that already are impacted: Florida Ave. and Sanderson Ave., and Devonshire and Sanderson Ave.

Page 55 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 661 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-19
Improvements to these intersections are constrained by existing development on either side of the roadway.

The Roadway Circulation Master Plan (Figure 4.1) generally conforms to previously adopted 1992 circulation master plan, except that some new streets are added or reclas sified, and lane configurations or intersection geometrics have been modified for selected street segments. A comparison of the identified changes to the roadway network is provided in Appendix D of the General Plan.

Sustainable Transportation Network Sustainable transportation networks are designed to improve the balance between environmental concerns, community objectives, and performance (mobility and safety). Within Hemet, progress toward a su stainable transportation system can be advanced by focusing on the following objectives, as stated in the General Plan traffic analysis by Urban Crossroads (2011):
❖ Network Connectivity (more than one route between land uses and a mixture of low speed and high speed road connections wherever possible)
❖ Operational Balance (flexibility to achieve community objectives and place making without sacrificing safety and mobility)
❖ Emissions Reduction / Energy Efficiency (prioritize designs which minimize idling times and vehicle miles traveled, help conserve resources and minimize waste) ❖ Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations (walkways and bikeways fully integrated) ❖ Transit Readiness (access to transit stops and effective interface of modes ❖ Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Facilities (system of NEV provisions: paths, lan es, charging stations, etc.)
❖ Quality Public Space (roadways spatially defined with structures and landscaping).

4.4.6 Roadway Classifications
Circulation plan roadways in Hemet are defined using a hierarchical classification system. Each type of roadway is described by size, function, and capacity. The circulation plan establishes eight types of roadways, ranging from six-lane highways to two-lane roadways. The circulation plan does not describe SR 79 (which will be a Caltrans facility) or local streets. Although there are numerous local streets serving individual neighborhoods, and these streets feed into the larger roadway network, they are not considered master -planned streets that are part of the circulation network.

The design of the local streets is still subject to the City’s engineering and subdivision Street Standards. The realigned SR 79, west of Warren Road, is being designed to expressway standards.

Design is undertake n by Caltrans, with primary overview by RCTC. SR 79 is anticipated to be constructed in phases, with the first phase to include fewer lanes and at -grade crossings, with additional lanes, interchanges, and overpasses added later.

City roadways consist of b oth divided and undivided roadways. Divided roadways generally contain a physical barrier or buffer, such as a curbed median or a continuous two -way left-turn lane, between each direction of travel. Divided roadways remove vehicles making a left turn from the travel lanes to keep slowing vehicles from impeding through traffic and constricting roadway capacity. Undivided roadways do not contain a buffer between each direction of travel and,

Page 56 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 662 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-20
therefore, left -turning traffic can impede through traffic. Undivide d roadways may widen to provide turn movement pockets at intersections.

The standard roadway classifications are listed in Table 4.3 and described in the paragraphs that follow. The descriptions relate to segment design, and illustrate the configuration a t midblock.

Typical nonintersection cross-sections are illustrated in Figure 4.2.

Additional rights -of-way (beyond the standard width) may be required at higher volume intersections to provide for safe turning movements. The standard roadway classifications are described in the table and paragraphs below.

Page 57 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 663 of 1916 ends

C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-21

Table 4.3
Roadway Classifications
Classification
# of
Lanes
Raised
Median
ROW Width
(ft.)
Curb-to-Curb
Width (ft.)
Arterial 6 Yes 130–140 102–112
Major 4 Yes 98–108 78
Divided Secondary—A 4 Yes 94 70
Divided Secondary—B 4 Yes 94 64
Secondary 4 No 94 64
Express Collector 3 No 66 44
Collector 2 No 66–74 44
Rural Collector 2 No 44 32
Local Rural 2 No 44 24

Arterial—An Arterial is a six-lane road with a median and is intended to have a somewhat limited amount of access. Typically, Arterials have at -grade intersections with other roads, with separations of at least one -quarter mile between intersection crossings and v ery limited driveway access points.

Intersections are at grade, with signalization of crossings. Some intersections may only permit right -turn access. On -street parking is not permitted.

Medians are raised, with landscaping and/or hardscaping (e.g., decora tive paving or features). Median widths vary between 14 and 24 feet and account for variable rights-of-way and curb-to-curb widths. Two existing or planned roads, Domenigoni Parkway and the Ramona Expressway, have unique designs that include greater median widths and parkways, and greater separations between access points.

Major—A Major street is a four-lane street with a landscaped median. Under unique circumstances related to neighborhood traffic needs, painted medians can be considered by decision makers . On-street parking is not permitted.

Major streets are intended to have design speeds based on greater sight distance, curves that are less acute, restricted access, and greater distance between intersection crossings. At intersections, the street can be altered to allow acceleration, deceleration, and turn lanes. Parkways will vary between 10 and 15 feet wide, and right -of-way widths will vary accordingly. It is assumed that areas with extensive existing development will have the narrower rights -of-way, w hile newly developing areas will have the wider rights-of-way.

Divided Secondary A—A Divided Secondary street is a four-lane street, but differs from Secondary Streets in that they have a landscaped median. Under unique circumstances related to community d esign issues, painted medians can be considered by decision makers. Divided Secondary streets are likely to have speeds that accommodate roadway constraints and

Page 58 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 664 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-22
community design issues. Bike lanes are accommodated, which results in narrower Parkways than those on Divided Secondary B streets.

Divided Secondary B —A Divided Secondary B street is similar to the Divided Secondary A street described above; however, the Divided Secondary B street does not provide for bike lanes, resulting in a smaller curb- to-curb footprint than the Divided Secondary A street.

Secondary—A Secondary street is a four-lane street with a painted centerline and no median. Parking is not accommodated but bike lanes may be accommodated. Intersection designs may allow special turning opportunities.

Express Collector—Express Collectors accommodate heavier traffic flow in one direction, providing additional capacity to guide traffic toward signalized intersections with appropriate capacity and turning movement facilities. Between intersections, the Express Collector cross-section includes two lanes in one direction and one lane in the opposite direction. A single bicycle lane is accommodated between the single opposing lane and the curb.

Parking is not accommodated. At signal -controlled intersections, the right - of-way is intended to be widened to allow left-turning lanes.

Collector—A Collector is a two -lane roadway with full shoulders within a 66-foot right -of-way within already developed areas and within a 74 -foot right-of-way in newly developing areas. The additional right-of-way provides for additional parkway improvements and fence or wall setbacks. Collectors provide access from local streets to the highway system. Collectors are intended to serve intensive residential land uses and multiple-family dwellings or to convey traffic through an area to roads of equal or similar classification or higher. In newly developing areas, residences will not be permitted to have individual driveways onto the street, and parking may not be accommodated to allow space for bicycles, NEV lanes, or other improvements.

Rural Collector—A Rural Collector is a two-lane road that serves very low volumes of traffic in areas with little or no development, or very low density development. These roads typically occur in very rural or hillside areas, such as Avery Canyon or where Sage Road is located. Curbs and gutters are not generally used and shoulders are typically unimproved (dirt). Bike lanes are provided on Rural Collectors.

Local Rural—Similar to the Rural Collector, a local rural street serves a small area of homes or businesses in a rural or mountainous setting. Pavement width is smaller than a Rural Collector because bike lanes are not provided.

Additional design considerations based on specific projects may also be approved at the discretion of the public works director when based on specific design constraints or modified roadway sections in specific plans.

Page 59 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 665 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-23
Figure 4.2 Roadway Classification Cross -Sections

Page 60 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 666 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-24
Backside of Figure 4.2

Page 61 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 667 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-25

4.4.7 COMPLETE STREETS
AB 1358, the Complete Streets Act, requires cities and counties to identify how the jurisdiction will provide for the routine accommodation of all users of the roadway. Planning and implementing “complete streets” is one way cities and counties can meet this requirement.

A complete street is a transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to enable safe access for all roadway users.

Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities must be able t o safely move along and across a complete street. Complete streets help facilitate a variety of important community benefits. Some of these benefits are described in the following list:
❖ Complete streets provide safe travel choices and give people the opti on to avoid traffic jams while increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network.
❖ Complete streets encourage healthy physical activity. Public health experts promote walking and bicycling to combat obesity, especially in children.
❖ Planning fo r complete streets cuts costs. Integrating sidewalks, bike lanes, transit amenities, and safe crossings into the initial design of a project is more cost-effective than making retrofits later. ❖ Complete streets can lead to economic revitalization by reduci ng transportation costs and travel time while increasing property values and job growth in communities.
❖ Thoughtful design and accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians reduces the incidence of crashes and improves safety for all transportation users.
❖ Complete streets foster strong communities where all people feel safe and welcome on the roadways and where walking and bicycling are an essential part of improving public transportation and creating friendly, walkable neighborhoods.

Identifying opportunities for select roadways to become complete streets that include such elements as pedestrian travel, canopy shade trees, activity nodes, NEV lanes, and pervious pavement or bioswales, will add to the street's value and multi-purpose use. While not all streets need be developed as complete streets, determining key locations and accompanying design standards are recommended implementation programs to foster complete streets within the City.

The General Plan meets the goals and policies of the Complete Stree ts Act in several ways. First, the General Plan fundamentally increases the range of transportation options for circulation within the City of Hemet and to adjacent western Riverside County jurisdictions by identifying a backbone network of bicycle and pedestrian routes. This on- and off-street network of routes improves safety for pedestrians and cyclists by providing dedicated

Page 62 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 668 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-26
facilities apart from vehicles. The General Plan also addresses ancillary facilities that are necessary to make a complete street work: the General Plan establishes preferred or “typical” design standards for route classifications and discusses the need for bicycle accommodations. Lastly, the General Plan specifically includes facilities consistent with the recently completed Western Riverside County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan.

4. 5 NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLES
NEVs are a street legal, low cost, energy efficient, zero emissions mode of local travel that is currently available —but current impediments to widespread usage include lack of interconnected low-speed routes and driver confusion regarding where these vehi cles can safely be operated. These problems can be addressed in Hemet by implementing an integrated local NEV plan that overcomes connection issues, identifies safe routes, and enables clear communication about where residents can go in low -speed vehicles.

The unintended consequence of providing a high level of mobility on our roadways includes high-speed auto-oriented patterns that sometimes inhibit the operation of low -speed vehicles and other modes of transportation.

Drivers are gradually becoming aware of the official low -speed vehicle classification, commonly described as NEVs, which are already approved at federal and state levels for use on public streets. With their emphasis on short trips and speed capabilities capped at 25 miles per hour (mph), NEV s are generally restricted to streets with posted speed limits of 35 mph or less.

Accommodating a Low-Speed-Travel Culture in Hemet
Accommodating low-speed vehicles with zero emissions is a potent strategy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while en couraging a healthier level of community interaction. Although some level of NEV ownership and operation will occur regardless of the city’s attention to the matter, Hemet can proactively address conflicting mode issues and encourage safe NEV operations by:
❖ identifying the suitable NEV backbone routes as potentially shown in Figure 4.3,
❖ implementing street signage and striping of lanes for appropriate operation of low-speed vehicles,
❖ providing parking incentives and low-cost charging stations, and ❖ promoting the NEV plan to the public.

These activities are essential to acceptance and use of NEVs by residents and businesses.

Use of NEVs by the general public has increased for transporting kids to school, shopping, and other neighborhood trips. To accommodate the NEV users, special parking areas can be provided in local grocery and commercial shopping centers. Additionally, the downtown core of Hemet, and the

Page 63 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 669 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-27
neighborhoods immediately surrounding it, tends to have collector streets with speed limits of 25 to 35 mph, which are suitable for NEVs. Given Hemet’s grid street system with lower speed limits and relatively compact geography, NEV vehicles can be accommodated as a means of providing local transport. Larger, new planned developments present the same opportunity if low-speed connecting roads are provided.

Expanding NEV Use by Implementing a Citywide NEV Plan
NEVs have many benefits. NEVs can offer residents the ability to circulate the community without having to start an automobile with a combustion - powered engine. The NEV will be an enjoyable way to reach nearby commercial and activity centers in the local area and to visit neighbors. In addition, NEVs:
❖ are a relatively inexpensive vehicle to own and operate, ❖ are particularly well suited to trips less than 10 miles, ❖ do not contribute to the air pollution caused by the cold starts and operation of typical high-speed autos,
❖ achieve an energy equivalent of at least 150 miles per gallon (based upon 2002 California Energy Commission report), and
❖ have potenti al to run fossil -fuel free using solar or wind power to generate their electricity.

Figure 4.3 shows a potential NEV network for Hemet that is oriented to existing roadways and could therefore be implemented in the next few years.

It incorporates “backbone low speed connectors” that focus on streets with a posted speed limit of 35 mph or less. Low speed connectors either provide direct connection to key destinations or link to NEV/bike lanes on higher speed routes. Shared NEV/bike lanes are proposed for hig her speed routes in conjunction with Class II bike lanes. Restriping or, in some cases, widening of roadway cross-sections may be necessary where bike lanes do not exist or where existing bike lanes are less than 7 feet wide.

The planned backbone network p rovides a basic NEV system that can be modified or embellished as needed as new areas of the city are developed.

Connections to nearby jurisdictions can also be evaluated where appropriate because travel is rarely restricted by City boundaries.

While there is sometimes interest in allowing golf carts to be included in a NEV plan, this may raise concerns for on -street usage on a citywide scale.

When a NEV travels at its top speed of 25 mph, it still holds up some traffic in shared -lane conditions on local o r collector streets. If it travels more slowly, it may encourage inappropriate passing by vehicles from the rear that could disrupt neighborhood safety. There are several models of NEV today that travel at 25 mph and should offer a reasonable variety to residents.

Page 64 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 670 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-28
NEVs, Transit, and Bikes—Strategies for Safe Operations Implementation of a citywide NEV Plan should be carefully reviewed by professionals and stakeholders so that potential conflicts between low-speed vehicles and autos, bikes, or transit operations can be addressed within each segment designated. For example, NEVs are not allowed in standard bike lanes (Class II facilities), which are often 5 –6 feet wide (too narrow for NEVs). They are also not allowed in the auto lanes on fast roads. The initial NEV network suggested for Hemet identifies the backbone network where NEVs can safely operate and shared NEV/bike lanes for selected routes with higher speeds. Once this network is refined and adopted into a NEV plan, the network can be made available to residents and businesses to communicate how to get around town in low-speed vehicles.

4. 6 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
A comprehensive public transit network is critical in providing a transportation system that meets the goals and policies of the Circulation Element. As vehicle congestion continues to grow and opportunities to add road capacity are further limited, transit will increasingly be utilized to meet the mobility needs of the City of Hemet over the next 30 years.

Transit promotes livable communitie s. Use of public transit will also promote more walkable neighborhoods, foster more cohesive communities, and provide better transportation options for members of the community where car ownership is either a hardship or an impossibility. Providing more transportation choices through extension of public transit opportunities will enable the City’s residents and employees to rely less on automobile travel, reduce vehicle -miles traveled, and accommodate new development while minimizing the need for unsustainable roadway expansion.

Public transit in the Hemet area consists of taxis, paratransit vans, buses, and future passenger services through the Metrolink rail system. Figure 4. 4 illustrates transit service features in Hemet.

4.6.1 PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE
The existing San Jacinto Branch Rail line runs east/west through Hemet from Perris. The rail line is the Riverside–San Jacinto spur line originally owned by the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad (ATSF), was purchased by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. AT&SF operated the rail line from 1888 to 1897, primarily to serve the agricultural operations in the valley.

The BNSF Railway operates freight service as the successor to ATSF. The line runs between Riverside and San Jacinto via March Air Base, Perris, and Hemet. In the Hemet Planning Area, the line runs northeasterly from Winchester to downtown Hemet, where it curves north and runs along Harvard Street, parallel to and east of State Street.

The original depot is located at the corner of State Street and Florida Avenue, and the Hemet Library is located adjacent to the line. A downtown passenger station is envisioned, as is a passenger station proximate to the future SR 79 and relocated Stetson Avenue interchange.

Page 65 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 671 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-29
Figure 4.3 NEV Network

Page 66 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 672 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-30
Backside of Figure 4.3

Page 67 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 673 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-31

Metrolink is a regional passenger rail service to reduce the congestion on highways and improve mobility throughout southern California. Metrolink provides rail service to Riverside County. The Riverside Line runs trains from Riverside to Orange County and Los Angeles. Metrolink has multiple stations in Riverside County, including Pedley Station, Riverside-Downtown Station, Riverside–La Sierra Station, and West Corona Station. An extension of the Riverside Transit Corridor alon g the San Jacinto branch line to Hemet is proposed, and Perris and Perris-South Stations are proposed for construction in 2013. Long -term plans call for an extension of the line to Hemet, connecting Hemet with Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino Counties and other parts of Riverside County.

Potential future Metrolink stations are located near the future SR 79 alignment at Stetson Avenue in west Hemet and near State Street at Menlo Avenue in downtown Hemet. Metrolink trains would be accommodated on the existing BNSF Railway line. Completion of transportation improvements to Metrolink linking Hemet to new destinations will increase traveling and commuting options for Hemet residents and reduce dependence on private automobile travel. As new areas are developed near transportation corridors and nodes, residents and visitors will benefit from the “smart growth” designs, which promote greater walkability and proximity to daily services, thus reducing both the detrimental environme ntal effects of vehicles and congestion.

Considerations for Future Railway Designs
The existing BNSF Railway line currently crosses the Planning Area and the City at grade (i.e., no overpasses). The rail line is generally only crossed by streets designated in this element as Collector and above.. Street crossings are typically protected by automatic signals and gates. Freight trains operate on a demand schedule (i.e., upon request) and demand has been low enough that the movements of the infrequent trains, street traffic, and pedestrians have not conflicted. If freight demand substantially increases within the developed portions of the City, or when Metrolink service is provided, street crossings will need to be evaluated. Although grade -separated crossings are generally preferred, overpasses are probably infeasible within the developed portions of the City because of existing development and may not be warranted from a traffic/train usage perspective. However, larger new developments should be evaluated for potential effects of traffic and pedestrians on crossing functioning and safety, and constructing or accommodating the future construction of overpasses should be considered. Overpasses are most appropriate in new development in the southwest portion of t he Planning Area.

Page 68 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 674 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-32

4.6.2 BUS AND LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICES
The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) provides public transportation throughout Riverside County. RTA operates fixed bus routes providing public transit service throughout a 2,500 -square-mile area of western Riverside County. RTA's fixed routes have been designed to establish transportation connections between all cities and unincorporated communities in western Riverside County. RTA bus lines 32, 33, and 42 provide local access in the Hemet Planning Area and neighboring San Jacinto as shown in Figure 4.4 (Transit Service Features). RTA routes currently use the Hemet Valley Mall located near the intersection of Florida Avenue and Kirby Street as a hub point for all routes serving the Hemet and San Jacinto areas and for those routes connecting to regional destinations.

Future transit routes are also shown on Figure 4. 4, and are anticipated to provide additonal connectivity throughout the less centralized portions of the City and Planning Area. Ultimately , RTA envisions constructing a Transit Center in the Hemet area. A location has not been determined, but one alternative would be to site the center in conjunction with a downtown or west Hemet Metrolink station.

The current SR 79 alignment through the Cities of San Jacinto and Hemet is only suitable to accommodate local public transportation services. However, a number of future transit opportunities exist near the SR 79 realignment. A multi-modal public transportation system offers many benefits, such as increased mobility, decreased traffic congestion, energy savings, and decreased pollution and GHGs. A transit system could be built around a set of land use nodes throughout Hemet and nearby cities. A one-way loop, with stops within a 5 -minute walk, can e ffectively serve about 1.5 square miles with 10-minute frequencies of service and require only a single vehicle and a single lane right -of-way. New services would
need to be established to provide the compatibility with a future multi-modal transportation system. The right -of-way for the realignment of SR 79 also includes designated right -of-way for transit; however, the type of transit facility has not yet been designated. The City is committed to ensuring that public transportation becomes a viable travel alternative to the automobile and is taking steps to ensure that transit accessibility is a primary consideration within new mixed-use and redevelopment proposals.

Design Considerations for Public Transit
To advance public transit use, comfort, and safety, consider the following strategies in transit design:
❖ Integrate methods that will allow buses to stop for passengers without disrupting vehicular traffic such as a wider traffic lanes or a turnout at the bus stop location.
❖ Locate transit stops to minimize the impact of buses and ridership activity on nearby neighborhoods. Incorporate buffer zones as feasible.

Page 69 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 675 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-33
Figure 4.4 Transit Services

Page 70 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 676 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-34
Back of Figure 4.4

Page 71 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 677 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-35
❖ Locate bus stops on the “far -side” of an intersection to avoid conflicts with traffic queuing in the right turn lane.
❖ Provide amenities for transit users such as benches, shade, lighting, shelters, and bicycle racks, where appropriate.
❖ Ensure that transit stops meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements by providing a continuous paved con nection to and from the stop.

Paratransit Options
Several paratransit options exist for senior citizens that are not able to drive, or would rather not drive. RTA’s Dial -A-Ride program provides general advanced reservation service, Senior/Disabled service, and Priority Service for persons certified under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Care-A-Van service is also offered within the City of Hemet for seniors and disabled travelers that qualify as low income. Hemet Valley Medical Center offers patient transportation to and from the hospital.

4. 7 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
Bicycling promotes the neighborhood character and community feel of Hemet by allowing for a low-impact, convenient, and healthy transportation option. Reducing short commute and utilitarian vehicle trips can promote healthier living, and encourage residents to interact with their local neighborhood by patronizing local busines s and socializing with neighbors.

An effective bicycle transportation plan promotes bicycling as both a viable transportation alternative and an enjoyable recreational pastime.

A comprehensive bicycle network, including bicycle routes, convenient bicycle parking facilities, and overall street designs that make the roadway network more hospitable to cycling, will make cycling competitive with the private automobile for short trips. Implementing a bicycle network helps to achieve the balance in the transportation network by providing an affordable alternative to the private automobile, and provides better transportation options for people who cannot drive.

The Circulation Element identifies a master plan for bicycle and pedestrian trail systems throughout th e City and Planning Area, allowing residents to travel from neighborhoods to key destinations like schools, parks, shopping and employment centers. The Bikeway Circulation Plan is provided in Figure

4.5. Additional off -road bike trails for recreational us ers is discussed in Chapter 8 (Recreation and Trails) and shown in Figure 8.3.

In addition to offering recreational and public health benefits, nonvehicular modes of transportation offer options for both commuting and convenience trips around the City. Also, the mixed-use environments advocated by Land Use Element policies will encourage increased pedestrian activity on City sidewalks for both business and pleasure. Finally, an equestrian network in selected areas will offer recreational benefits, although it will be limited to nontraffic areas to avoid conflicts between horses and traffic. An effective bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian network must be safe and accessible and must connect key activity centers within the City with each other and with the regional trail system. Hemet’s current bike trail system includes Class 1

Page 72 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 678 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-36
bike paths, Class 2 bike lanes, and Class 3 bike routes. Recreational trails such as mixed-use trails and trails for equestrian and hiking only are discussed in the Recreation and Trails Element (Chapter 8). Opportunities for Class 3 bike routes exist along many of the City’s collector streets and sometimes secondary streets, typically following quarter -mile grids. Designated Scenic Highways have a design requirement for wide multiple -use paseos that accommodate pedestrians, joggers, and bicyclists, and wider sections already exist on Sanderson and Florida Avenues. While these multiple-use paseos do not meet the formal Class 1, 2, or 3 definitions of bikeways, they nevertheless provide a valuable resource for users.

Currently, opportunities for bicycling or walking as viable transportation options vary in different parts of the City. In the older, central portion of the City, designated bike routes are constrained by street widths that typically do not accommodate designated lanes. This is particularly true on collector streets where the typical widths allow only either on -street parking, designated bike lanes, or medians. However, the central portion of the City often has sidewalks, and the grid system provides flexibility for bicycle riders on side streets. Newer portions of the City typically have a larger grid system that may or may not include sidewalks or bike paths, although some of the more recently developed areas often include mixed-use pathways, particularly in areas developed under specific plan entitlements. As development occurs, particularly at the subdivision level, improvements to pedestrian and bicycle access are required. In the more rural edges of the City, these improvements have also included equestrian facilities where practical connections exist to rural equestrian-oriented areas. Existing trail systems within the City usually are not well connected to other trails or common uses. The City will continue to develop and maintain a comprehensive network of on-street bicycle lanes, off-street bicycle paths, sidewalks, and trails. The City will work to increase the safety and utility of the system, with a particular focus on sidewalk - deficient residential and industrial areas.

Bikeway Circulation Plan
The bikeway circulation system envisioned within this element is shown in Figure 4.5 and uses three classes of bikeways, with cross -sections shown in Figure 4. 6. These classes are similar to those used by Caltrans and the WRCOG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan . The circulation system is intended to serve both local and regional bicycle trips. The bikeway circulation system follows a hierarchy serving individual homes and destinations (nondesignated routes and Clas s 3), feeding into a wider circulation system (Class 2), and augmented by a separate through system that provides regional connections (Class 1).

Class 3 bikeways (bike routes) are suitable as shared routes with regard to size and traffic, are continuous o r connect to Class I or Class II bikeways.

Normally, bike routes are shared with motor vehicles and look like an ordinary street, but have signs designating the street as a “Bike Route” (serving to inform bicyclists and remind motorists of the presence of bicyclists). A summary of the bikeway classifications is provided in Table 4.4.

Page 73 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 679 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-37

Figure 4.5 Bicycle Circulation Plan

Page 74 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 680 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-38
Back side of Figure 4.5

Page 75 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 681 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-39
Figure 4.6 Bikeway Cross -Section

Page 76 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 682 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-40
Backside of Figure 4.6

Page 77 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 683 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-41

Table 4.4
Descriptions of Bikeway Classifications
Class 1 bikeway (bike path) Provides a completely separated right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with
minimized cross-flow by motorists
Class 2 bikeway (bike lane) Provides a striped lane for one-way bike travel on a street
Class 3 bikeway (bike route) Provides for shared use with pedestrian or motor-vehicle traffic

Although not recognized as formal bikeways, ordinary side streets also serve to feed bicycle traffic to formal bikeways and to provide bicyclists with routes for short convenience trips. This is particularly true in the central portion of the City, with its closely spaced grid of streets. Additionally, residential neighborhood sidewalks provide places for children to ride bicycles. Finally, paseos along Scenic Highways provide similar opportunities.

Bicyclists vary significantly in their skill level, reasons for bicycling, and common destinations. All of these factors can affect what facilities a cyclist will use and value, and how a cyclist will use those facili ties. The following definitions (Urban Crossroads, 2011) help to describe and assess the different needs of the City of Hemet’s cycling public:

Casual Bicyclist Includes those who feel less comfortable negotiating traffic, often bicycle shorter distances than experiences riders, and may be unfamiliar with many of the rules of the road. Casual bicyclists benefit from route markers and wayfinding signage, bicycle lanes, wider curbs, and educational programs.

Commuter Bicyclist -Employee Bicycle commuters wh o ride to work, marking their entire commute by bicycle or by using their bicycle to link with other modes of transportation including buses, trains, or carpools and rideshares. Commuter bicyclists value direct routes between residential and employment areas, safe and secure bicycle parking facilities, and locer and shower facilities at their place of employment.

Commuter Bicyclist-Student Bicyclists who travel between their home and their school. Grade school bicycle commuters typically commute less than five miles to school, cross few arterials, and often use the sidewalk. College and university students are likely to bicycle less than five miles as well, but may travel as long as ten to fifteen miles. Like employee commuters, student commuters are lik ely to value direct routes, and may be more likely than employee commuters to prefer routes with less traffic and arterial crossings.

Experienced Bicyclist Includes those who prefer the most direct route between origin and destination and prefer riding wit hin or near the vehicle travel lanes. Experienced bicyclists negotiate streets in much the same manner as motor vehicles, merging across traffic to make left turns, and

Page 78 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 684 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-42
avoiding bicycle lanes and shoulders that contain gravel and glass.

Experienced bicyclists benefit from wider curb lanes and bicycle -actuated loop detectors at signals.

Recreational Bicyclists-Casual Bicyclist Casual recreational cyclists are those who generally want to ride on off -street bikeways and cover shorter trip distances at slower speeds. Casual cyclists will tend to take trips of less than 10 miles in length, and may ride as a family group with children.

Recreational destinations are also important for casual cyclists, as they provide a place to stop and get off the bike. To this end, having secure bicycle parking at destinations is important.

Recreational Bicyclists -Road Bicyclist Road cyclists bicycle almost exclusively on roadways, which accommodate higher speeds, longer distances, and few conflicts with other recreational us ers. Typical trip distances for the road cyclist can range from 10 miles to over 50 miles. While the average road cyclist would likely prefer to ride on roads with little or no traffic, they are generally comfortable riding in traffic if necessary. To t his end, a road cyclist will tend to ride in a manner similar to a motor vehicle (e.g., when approaching traffic signals or making left turns). Road cyclists are typically not seeking a recreational destination along the route, as a ride itself is the recreation.

The use of bicycles for travel and recreation should be encouraged through the provision of bicycle facilities, including travel routes, lighting, rest amenities, and storage facilities. Additionally, bicycle safety programs can increase the tend ency to choose the bicycle travel mode. The proposed bikeway system includes more connectivity than in previous plans, allowing bicycle users better access throughout the City and planning area.

Pedestrian Network
The City’s existing pedestrian network consists of ordinary street sidewalks, of paseos in larger scale developments or along portions of Florida and Sanderson Avenues, or of regional trails that may be shared with bicyclists or equestrians. Sidewalks are required in new developments except where rural street standards can be applied because the lot sizes along side streets are large. Some existing areas of the City that are outside the core central area were developed either as rural areas or as large lot subdivisions and do not have sidewalks. As future improvements are made to major streets, or as new development occurs, these areas will gradually include more sidewalks. All new commercial and industrial development must include sidewalks.

Additionally, the Community Design Element includes multi-use paths along Scenic Highways. The Land Use Element also envisions pedestrian -friendly design for new development.

4.7.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY NON-MOTORIZED

TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Non-Motorized Transportation Plan (NMTP) provides a regional backbone network of bicyle and pedestrian facilities to provide enhanced transportation mobility.

Page 79 of 100 ends

20.B

Page 685 of 1916 ends

CIRCULATION
C I T Y O F H E M E T G E N E R A L P L A N 2030
4-43
The NMTP identifies 28 distinct regional bicycle and pedestrian -friendly routes spannin g 440 miles throughout Western Riverside County. The proposed system provides multi -jurisdiction connections between WRCOG’s member agencies. The resulting network includes existing and potential on -street (Class II and Class III) and off -road (Class I) routes intended for near -term through long -range implementation. The routes provide access to Metrolink stations, transit centers, and key activity areas throughout the region. The backbone network provides connectivity between cities, the unincorporated Riverside County area, and adjacent counties.

The NMTP will be incorporated into Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The proposed regional routes may be implemented in segments over time and should b e considered in any regional planning effort.

Table 4.5
WRCOG Non-Motorized Transportation Corridors
in the Hemet Planning Area
Route Name Classification Length
(Miles)
10 San Jacinto River –
Bautista Creek Class 11 28.5
14 San Jacinto – Diamond
Valley Class 1/11 11.5
15 Salt Creek – Domenigoni Class 1/11 23.7
22 Gibbel - Fairview Class 1/11 7.8

There are four corridors that are planned within the City of Hemet or the Planning Area, as outlined in Table 4.5 and illustrated in the NMTP corridor maps (Appendix D). All of the proposed corridors have been incorporated into the City of Hemet’s bikeway network (Figure 4.5) and off -street trails network (Figure 8.3).

4.8 FREIGHT AND GOODS MOVEMENT
An efficient and effective goods movement system is essential to Hemet’s economic livelihood. Although Riverside County generates a significant amount of truck traffic from agricultural and industrial uses, it also serves as a pass-through for truck traffic that ultimately serves other areas inside and outside of California. Trucks comprise at least 15 percent of the daily traffic volume on some of the primary goods movement corridors in Riverside County, such as I-15 from Temecula to Ontario, SR 60 west from I-215, and I-10 in the Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass areas. Healthy industrial growth is expected within the City of Hemet and Riverside County; therefore, the scale of industrial -related truck traffic will conti nue to increase. It is anticipated that the region's truck volumes will increase by 40 percent through 2020.

The movement of freight and goods to, from, and inside Hemet is typically by truck, but can also be by rail and air. Regional truck routes follow S R 74, SR 79, and Domenigoni Parkway. The designation of Truck Routes is

Page 80 of 100 ends

Hemet City CouncilDecember 13, 2022

Hemet City Council
December 13, 2022