Hemet City Council
October 13, 2026

18.F.

 Full recovery of the City’s investment. The City acquired the Fire Engine at no cost. The only City funds invested in it are for the Communications Equipment, and Cathedral City will reimburse the City $6,335.12, the fair market value of that equipment. Because the equipment was recently purchased and installed, its acquisition cost is a reasonable measure of its fair market value.
 Continued public safety use. The Fire Engine came to the City for public safety purposes and will remain in public fire service rather than being sold into the private market.

Any benefit to Cathedral City is incidental to these purposes of the City. With those findings, the donation is not a gift of public funds.

C. Terms of the Transfer. The resolution makes the transfer conditional. Title and possession will not pass until (1) Cathedral City pays the reimbursement in full; and (2) Cathedral City signs an agreement and release in a form approved by the City Attorney. That agreement, which will follow the form the City itself signed as recipient of the Pechanga donation, will provide that Cathedral City accepts the Fire Engine “as is,” “where is,” and “with all faults,” without any warranty; waives and releases all claims against the City; and will defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless from claims arising from its ownership, possession, transport, or use of the Fire Engine. Cathedral City will bear all costs of pickup and transport, title and registration, removal of City of Hemet names and insignia, and all future maintenance, repair, inspection, training, and compliance. Because the Fire Engine is registered to the City with exempt plates, Cathedral City must register it in its own name once ownership transfers (Veh. Code § 4155(b)); as a public agency, Cathedral City is generally exempt from registration fees (Veh. Code § 9103). Only the Fire Engine and the Communications Equipment are included; staff may remove loose equipment and other City property before transfer unless the City Manager decides particular items should remain with the engine.

D. Authority to Sign. The resolution authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute the donation agreement and release, a bill of sale, the certificate of title and Department of Motor Vehicles transfer forms, and any other documents needed to complete the transfer, and to approve non-substantive changes approved as to form by the City Attorney. It also directs the Purchasing Officer to complete the disposition under HMC section 2-337(c) once the conditions are met.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.

Objective 4: Increase employee retention by training and creating a positive workplace.

Objective 5: Streamline fire prevention coordination efforts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval will produce one-time revenue of $6,335.12, which the Administrative Services Director will deposit into the fund from which the Communications Equipment was purchased. Because the City acquired the Fire Engine at no cost, the donation results in no loss of City funds, and the reimbursement returns the City’s full cash investment in the apparatus. The City will forgo whatever proceeds a public auction of the Fire Engine might have produced, but will avoid the auction costs and the ongoing cost of storing, maintaining, and insuring an unneeded engine. No appropriation is required. The Fire Engine and Communications Equipment will be removed from the City’s fixedasset inventory after the transfer

18.F.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Approve the donation on different terms.

2. Direct staff to sell the Fire Engine by electronic bid or public auction under HMC section 2- 336(b).

3. Retain the Fire Engine as a reserve apparatus.

4. Provide other direction to the City Manager.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment No. 1 - Reso. No. 2026-181

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1

CITY OF HEMET

HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A 1998
AMERICAN LAFRANCE TYPE 1 FIRE ENGINE SURPLUS,

APPROVING ITS DONATION TO THE CITY OF

CATHEDRAL CITY SUBJECT TO REIMBURSEMENT OF

THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE INSTALLED

COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY

DOCUMENTS
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City of Hemet (“City”) provides fire protection and emergency medical services through the Hemet Fire Department and owns a 1998 American LaFrance Type 1 fire engine, Vehicle Identification Number 4Z36ETDB4WR985825, Hemet Unit No. 3275, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” to this resolution (the “Fire Engine”); and
WHEREAS, the City acquired the Fire Engine at no cost to the City by donation from the Pechanga Band of Indians pursuant to an Equipment Donation Agreement dated April 11, 2025, which places no restriction on the City’s later use or disposition of the Fire Engine; and
WHEREAS, after acquiring the Fire Engine, the City purchased and installed in it certain communications equipment, consisting of a Kenwood mobile radio, a Motorola APX vehicular charger, and a power receiver vehicle kit (the “Communications

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
Equipment”), which is the only portion of the Fire Engine in which the City has invested its own funds; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Chief has determined that the Fire Engine is not needed by the City at the present time or in the foreseeable future, and no City department has requested its use; and
WHEREAS, Hemet Municipal Code section 2-327 defines “surplus personal property” as personal property not needed by the City at the present time or in the foreseeable future, and Hemet Municipal Code section 2-335 authorizes the City Council to declare personal property held by the City to be surplus; and WHEREAS, Hemet Municipal Code section 2-336 generally requires surplus personal property with an estimated value of more than $5,000 to be sold by electronic bid or public auction, but Hemet Municipal Code section 2-337(c) provides that, upon a written finding of public purpose and approval of the City Council, the Purchasing Officer may sell or donate items directly to public agencies without advertising them under section 2-336; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 37350 authorizes a city to hold personal property and to control and dispose of it for the common benefit; and WHEREAS, the City of Cathedral City (“Cathedral City”) is a California municipal corporation that provides fire protection, emergency medical, and rescue services through Cathedral City Fire & EMS, and has an immediate operational need for a Type 1 fire engine and has asked to acquire the Fire Engine; and WHEREAS, the City and Cathedral City are both fire service agencies within the Riverside County Operational Area that participate in the statewide mutual aid system

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
established under the California Emergency Services Act (Government Code sections 8615 through 8619) and the California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement, under which fire apparatus and personnel are routinely shared across jurisdictional lines during wildland fires, major structure fires, and other emergencies; and
WHEREAS, Cathedral City has agreed to accept the Fire Engine in its “as is” condition, to release and indemnify the City, and to reimburse the City $6,335.12, which represents the fair market value of the Communications Equipment, which will remain installed in the Fire Engine; and
WHEREAS, Article XVI, section 6 of the California Constitution prohibits a gift of public funds or property, but a transfer of property from one public agency to another is permissible where it serves a public purpose of the transferring agency, even though it also benefits the receiving agency; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the donation serves the City’s own public purposes because it (1) strengthens regional fire protection and mutual aid capacity on which the City and its residents rely during significant emergencies; (2) avoids the City’s continuing costs of storing, maintaining, insuring, and auctioning apparatus it no longer needs; (3) returns to the City the full fair market value of the Communications Equipment, the only portion of the Fire Engine purchased with City funds; and (4) keeps an apparatus that came to the City for public safety use in continued public fire service; and

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to declare the Fire Engine surplus, approve its donation to Cathedral City on the terms stated in this resolution, and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to complete the transfer.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS.

The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this resolution as findings of the City Council.

SECTION 2. DECLARATION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY.

Pursuant to Hemet Municipal Code section 2-335, the City Council declares the Fire Engine, together with the Communications Equipment installed in it, to be surplus personal property not needed by the City at the present time or in the foreseeable future. The City Council finds that no City department has a use for the Fire Engine.

This resolution constitutes the written declaration required by section 2-335.

SECTION 3. WRITTEN FINDING OF PUBLIC PURPOSE.

For purposes of Hemet Municipal Code section 2-337(c) and Article XVI, section 6 of the California Constitution, the City Council finds that the donation of the Fire Engine to Cathedral City serves a valid public purpose of the City for the reasons stated in the recitals of this resolution, which the City Council adopts as its written finding of public purpose. The City Council further finds that any benefit to Cathedral City is incidental to, and consistent with, these public purposes of the City, and that the donation is not a gift of public funds or property.

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF DONATION.

Pursuant to Hemet Municipal Code section 2-337(c), the City Council approves the direct donation of the Fire Engine to the City of Cathedral City for use in public fire protection, emergency response, mutual aid, training, and related public safety purposes, subject to the conditions in Section 5. Because Cathedral City is a public agency and the City Council has made the required written finding of public purpose, the advertising, bid, and auction procedures of Hemet Municipal Code section 2-336 do not apply to this transfer.

SECTION 5. CONDITIONS OF TRANSFER.

Title to and possession of the Fire Engine shall not be transferred until each of the following conditions has been satisfied:

A. Reimbursement. Cathedral City shall pay the City $6,335.12, representing the fair market value of the Communications Equipment, in full and in immediately available funds.

B. Donation Agreement and Release. Cathedral City shall execute a donation agreement and release, in a form approved by the City Attorney, under which Cathedral City accepts the Fire Engine and Communications Equipment “as is,” “where is,” and “with all faults,” without warranty of any kind; waives and releases all claims against the City; and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, and agents from all claims arising from the ownership, possession, transport, or use of the Fire Engine after transfer.

C. Costs and Responsibilities. Cathedral City shall bear all costs of taking possession of and transporting the Fire Engine, transferring title and registration,

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
removing or covering City of Hemet names, insignia, and markings, and all future operation, maintenance, repair, inspection, training, and regulatory compliance.

D. Retained Equipment. Only the Fire Engine and the Communications Equipment are transferred by this resolution. Loose equipment and other City property may be removed and retained by the City before transfer, unless the City Manager determines in writing that particular items should remain with the Fire Engine.

SECTION 6. AUTHORIZATION OF CITY MANAGER.

The City Manager, or the City Manager’s designee, is authorized to execute, on behalf of the City, the donation agreement and release described in Section 5, a bill of sale, the certificate of title and any California Department of Motor Vehicles transfer documents, and all other documents necessary to complete the transfer, and to take all other actions necessary to implement this resolution. The City Manager may approve non-substantive changes to those documents that are consistent with this resolution and approved as to form by the City Attorney. The Purchasing Officer is directed to complete the disposition of the Fire Engine to Cathedral City under Hemet Municipal Code section 2-337(c) once the conditions in Section 5 have been satisfied.

SECTION 7. RECEIPT OF FUNDS AND RECORDS.

The Administrative Services Director is authorized to receive the reimbursement and deposit it into the fund from which the Communications Equipment was purchased, and to remove the Fire Engine and Communications Equipment from the City’s fixedasset inventory after the transfer is complete. The Purchasing Officer shall maintain a record of the disposition in accordance with the Hemet Municipal Code and the City’s records retention schedule.

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
SECTION 8. CEQA.

The City Council finds that adoption of this resolution is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15378, subd. (b)(5)). In the alternative, the City Council finds that the action is exempt under State CEQA Guidelines section 15061, subdivision (b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that the transfer of an existing fire engine from one municipal fire department to another for continued fire service use will not have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This resolution takes effect immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 10. CERTIFICATION.

The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and retain it in the City’s official records.

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 2026.

___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 13th day of October, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk

18.F.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-181 1
EXHIBIT “A”

DESCRIPTION OF FIRE ENGINE AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT

FIRE ENGINE
Description: Type 1 Fire Engine
Year: 1998
Manufacturer: American LaFrance
Vehicle Identification Number: 4Z36ETDB4WR985825
Serial Number: 985825
Hemet Unit / Asset No.: 3275
License Plate No.: 1033650 (exempt)
Specifications: 1,750 GPM pump; 500-gallon water
tank; 20-gallon foam tank
Odometer: 88,587 miles (to be confirmed at
transfer)
Pump Hours: 905 (to be confirmed at transfer)

COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT (TO REMAIN INSTALLED)
Items: Kenwood mobile radio; Motorola APX
vehicular charger; power receiver
vehicle kit
Reimbursement: $6,335.12 (fair market value)

18.F.

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Oct 13 2026
Department: City Attorney
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Steven Graham, City Attorney;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution Establishing, Contingent Upon Voter Approval of Measure Q, the Measure Q Citizens' Advisory and Oversight Committee
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing, contingent upon voter approval of Measure Q, the Measure Q Citizens' Advisory and Oversight Committee.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
***THE COUNCIL DIRECTED THAT THIS ITEM BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA DURING THE OCTOBER 8, 2026 SPECIAL MEETING. THE RESOLUTION IS BEING DRAFTED AND WILL BE AVAILABLE AT OR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON TUESDAY*** Measure Q, a proposed one-cent general transactions and use tax, will appear on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The City’s public information materials on Measure Q state that a clear system of accountability would be required, including public disclosure of spending, independent citizens’ oversight, and audits. The Measure Q ordinance itself does not create an oversight body. The proposed resolution would create one, but only if the voters approve Measure Q. The committee would be advisory, would be separate from the existing Measure U committee, and would review proposed and actual Measure Q spending and advise the City Council on goals and priorities for that spending during the Council’s annual strategic planning session.

SB 1439 / LEVINE ACT: GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 84308 APPLICABILITY:

This agenda item may involve a contract, franchise, license, permit, land use approval, or other discretionary entitlement for use subject to Government Code section 84308. Councilmembers should review their campaign contribution records to determine whether they have received campaign contributions totaling more than $500 within the preceding 12 months from any party, participant, or other person whose contribution may be attributable under the Levine Act and FPPC regulations. If applicable, Councilmembers must disclose the contribution on the record and determine whether recusal or other compliance action is required. Applicants, contractors, and other

18.G.

parties or participants are also reminded of their disclosure obligations under Government Code section 84308 and applicable FPPC regulations.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

On July 14, 2026, the City Council voted to place Measure Q on the November 3, 2026 ballot. If approved by a majority of voters, Measure Q would add Article VII (Supplemental Transactions and Use Tax) to Chapter 74 of the Hemet Municipal Code and impose an additional one cent transactions and use tax, estimated to generate approximately $16 million per year. Measure Q is proposed as a general tax: its proceeds would be deposited in the General Fund and could be used for any lawful municipal purpose. Under Hemet Municipal Code section 74-201, the tax would become operative on the first day of the first calendar quarter beginning more than 110 days after the election, which staff anticipates would be April 1, 2027.

The Measure Q ordinance commits the City to accountability through the budget process, public financial reporting, and independent annual audits, and the City’s fact sheet and FAQ describe “independent citizens’ oversight.” The City Council has also considered and adopted a companion resolution at a special meeting on October 8, 2026 providing for separate accounting and annual budget consideration of Measure Q revenue, which includes independent citizens’ oversight by the creation of this committee.

The City already has a Measure U Citizen Oversight Committee, which reviews expenditures of the one-cent transactions and use tax approved by voters as Measure U in 2016 (Ordinance No. 1918) and continued by Measure H. That committee has seven members serving two-year terms, meets at least twice a year, and reports annually on proposed and actual Measure U expenditures and the annual audit. Because Measure U and Measure Q are separate taxes, the proposed resolution assigns Measure Q oversight to a separate committee with separate membership.

DISCUSSION:

A. Committee Structure. The resolution creates the Measure Q Citizens’ Advisory and Oversight Committee with seven members. As proposed, and subject to City Council discussion and direction, at least five of the members must be qualified registered voters of the City and/or City's Sphere of Influence and two shall be either business owners or designated representatives of a business located within the City of Hemet whose customers are subject to the Measure Q tax. At least four members of the committee must be registered voters of the City, to ensure that a majority of the committee consists of City residents while allowing participation by residents of surrounding unincorporated areas who shop in, and contribute to, the City’s sales tax base as well as businesses.

No person may serve on both the Measure Q committee and the Measure U committee at the same time.

B. Appointments. Each member of the City Council would have an opportunity to make a nomination to the committee of a registered voter of either the City or the City's Sphere of Influence, subject to City Council approval and the numerical restrictions above. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem would each have an additional, second nominee, for the two business representatives on the Committee.

C. Duties. The committee would (1) review and advise on the City’s proposed expenditure of Measure Q proceeds, including through the proposed annual budget; (2) review and advise on actual expenditures, including the City’s financial reports and independent annual audit; and (3) participate in the City Council’s annual strategic planning session to advise on goals and priorities for Measure Q spending. It would meet at least three times each fiscal year and present annual written reports to the City Council after each meeting with the recommendations of the committee.

18.G.

D. Conditional Adoption Before the Election. The resolution takes effect only if Measure Q is approved, on the date the City Council declares the election result. Adopting it now allows recruitment to begin promptly after the election so the committee can be in place near the anticipated April 1, 2027 operative date. A city may plan for the implementation of a measure, but may not use public resources to advocate for or against it. This report and the resolution are informational and take no position on how voters should vote on Measure Q, and any public communications about the committee before the election should remain strictly informational.

E. Brown Act and Maddy Act. Because the committee is created by formal action of the City Council, it is a “legislative body” subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54952, subd. (b)).

Its meetings must be noticed and open to the public. The City Clerk will include the committee on the City’s annual Local Appointments List and post vacancy notices as required by the Maddy Local Appointive List Act (Gov. Code §§ 54970–54974).

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

Objective 1: Enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight.

Objective 2: Explore and implement homelessness solutions for the City of Hemet.

Objective 3: Increase Public Safety visibility and response.

GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.

Objective 1: Deliver messaging to the Community that connects, is consistent, and relevant.

Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.

Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.

Objective 4: Increase employee retention by training and creating a positive workplace.

Objective 5: Streamline fire prevention coordination efforts.

18.G.

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Oct 13 2026
Department: City Attorney
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Steven Graham, City Attorney;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution Declaring the City Council's Intent to Conduct an Annual Strategic Planning Session in the First Quarter of Each Calendar Year to Establish City Goals and Priorities for the Following Fiscal Year's Budget
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution declaring the City Council’s intent to conduct an Annual Strategic Planning Session in the first quarter of each calendar year to establish city goals and priorities for the following Fiscal Year’s budget.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
***THE COUNCIL DIRECTED THAT THIS ITEM BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA DURING THE OCTOBER 8, 2026 SPECIAL MEETING. THE RESOLUTION IS BEING DRAFTED AND WILL BE AVAILABLE AT OR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON TUESDAY*** The City adopts an annual Strategic Plan, but there is no standing policy on when the City Council sets its goals relative to the budget cycle. The proposed resolution would establish the City Council’s intent to hold a strategic planning session in the first quarter of each calendar year, before the City Manager prepares the proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, so that the budget can be built around the City Council’s priorities. It would also give three advisory bodies a defined role: the Planning Commission, the Measure Q Citizens’ Advisory and Oversight Committee (if Measure Q is approved), and the Hemet Youth Council would be invited to advise the City Council on topics within their respective areas of interest. The resolution is a statement of policy and does not limit the City Council’s budget authority.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

The City’s fiscal year runs from July 1 through June 30. The City Manager prepares a proposed budget each spring, and the City Council adopts the budget in June. The City Council also adopts an annual Strategic Plan with goals and action items and receives periodic progress updates. In recent years, the Strategic Plan’s action items have been finalized around the start of each fiscal year, after the budget has been prepared.

18.H.

Several City advisory bodies have expertise relevant to the City’s goals. The Planning Commission reviews land use and development matters and makes recommendations on public and community facilities and capital improvement projects. The Hemet Youth Council, established in 2025 through the City’s Strategic Plan, gathers input from the City’s young residents and advises the City Council. If voters approve Measure Q on November 3, 2026, the Measure Q Citizens’ Advisory and Oversight Committee, proposed on this same agenda, would review Measure Q spending and advise the City Council on priorities for it.

DISCUSSION:

A. Aligning Goal-Setting With the Budget. Holding the strategic planning session between January and March allows the City Council to set goals and priorities before the City Manager prepares the proposed budget in the spring. The resolution asks the City Manager to present the proposed budget in a way that shows how it advances those goals, and provides that the goals will inform the City’s annual Strategic Plan. The Council envisions a regular timeline: staff preparation in the fall, advisory body input in January and February, the City Council session by March 31, budget preparation and adoption from April through June, and progress updates throughout the year.

B. Advisory Body Participation. Each of the three advisory bodies would be invited to advise the City Council on topics within its area of interest: the Planning Commission on land use, housing, development standards, General Plan implementation, and public facilities and capital improvement projects; the Measure Q committee on priorities for Measure Q spending; and the Youth Council on issues affecting young residents. Each body should discuss its recommendations at its own public meeting and present them to the City Council at the City Council's strategic planning workshop. The City Council may also invite other bodies and members of the community.

C. Statement of Policy. The resolution states the City Council’s intent; it does not bind future City Councils, limit the City Council’s authority over the budget, or alter the City Manager’s duties. The timing or content of a strategic planning session would not affect the validity of any budget or other action. If adopted, the first session under the resolution would take place between January and March 2027.

The Resolution is being drafted and will be presented at or before the City Council meeting.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

Adoption of the resolution has no direct fiscal impact. The annual session and advisory body participation will require staff time, which staff anticipates can be absorbed within existing budgets.

18.H.

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Oct 13 2026
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Travis Holyoak, Water/Waste Water Superintendent;
☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☒ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution Approving an Increase to the Pacific Hydrotech Corporation Agreement for CIP 5717 Well 15 and 16 Treatment Plant to Cover Additional Project Cost RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution (Attachment No. 1):

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN INCREASE OF $1,798,643.60 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 5717, WELL 15 AND 16 TREATMENT PLANT, TO COVER ADDITIONAL PROJECT COSTS;

AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $675,300.00, REPRESENTING 10% OF THE CONTRACT AMOUNT; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE $450,000.00 FROM THE WATER UTILITY FUND (FUND 571) FUND BALANCE; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve a $1,798,643.60 increase to the agreement with Pacific Hydrotech Corporation for CIP No. 5717, Wells 15 and 16 Treatment Plant. The proposed increase will fund change orders necessary to install additional prefiltration equipment at the treatment plant and rehabilitate and equip both wells. Staff also requests authorization to appropriate $400,000 from the Water Utility Fund (Fund 571) fund balance to support the additional project costs.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

The City of Hemet owns and operates a water distribution system that serves an area of approximately 5.25 square miles. The system includes approximately 132.3 miles of water mains, production wells, and inter-agency connections that provide potable water to more than 9,600 service connections throughout the City.

19.A.

1,2,3-Trichloropropane (TCP) is a chlorinated hydrocarbon that is highly stable and persistent in the environment. Effective January 2018, TCP became a regulated contaminant in California drinking water, with a State Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of micrograms per liter (µg/L), equivalent to 5 parts per trillion (ppt).

In response to the State's TCP regulation, City Wells 15 and 16 were taken offline in 2018 after testing indicated TCP concentrations above the State MCL. Well 15 is located at the southwest corner of Mary Henley Park, and Well 16 is located at Seven Hills Drive and Stetson Avenue.

City staff evaluated various treatment technologies and determined that Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) filtration was the preferred treatment technology for removing TCP from the well water. GAC treatment has relatively low capital and operational costs and is an approved treatment process for TCP by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board).

On December 10, 2024, the City Council awarded a Design-Build Agreement to Pacific Hydrotech, Inc. for CIP 5717, Design and Construction of a Treatment Plant for Wells 15 and 16. Following the award, Pacific Hydrotech, Inc., their design partner N2W, and City staff have continued to advance the project design. The design process has included evaluation of raw water quality data, treatment plant layouts, electrical requirements, well conditions and equipment, and coordination with the State Water Board.

N2W, Pacific Hydrotech, Inc.'s design partner, presented an update on the project to the City Council on June 24, 2025. Since that presentation, several project conditions and design considerations have been identified that affect the project scope and cost and require modifications to the original agreement to ensure the treatment facilities can operate effectively and reliably.

First, additional pretreatment of the raw water has been determined to be necessary. Staff and N2W identified the need for prefilters upstream of the GAC treatment system. Although prefilters were not included in the original proposal, their incorporation will help protect and extend the useful life of the GAC media and is anticipated to provide long-term operational and cost savings.

Second, additional well rehabilitation and equipment replacement were identified after the existing equipment was removed from the wells. City staff, N2W, and a City-retained hydrogeologist evaluated the condition of Wells 15 and 16 and determined that substantially more rehabilitation is required than was originally anticipated during the design-build process. In addition, the existing well equipment was determined to be unsuitable for reuse and will need to be replaced to support the reliable and efficient operation of both wells.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed cartridge prefilters would be installed upstream of the granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment system. The prefilters are intended to capture sediment and other particulates that may enter the treatment system, including during a potential well equipment failure, thereby protecting the GAC media from premature fouling and replacement. Installing the prefilters during construction is expected to be more cost-effective than retrofitting the system after completion of the treatment plant.

Pacific Hydrotech obtained pricing for this work, and the proposed change order totals $299,366.01 (Attachment No. 2). This amount includes the cartridge filter equipment, concrete pad, connecting piping, and associated design and installation work. The proposed change order does not include costs associated with electrical work, instrumentation, controls, or system integration, which Pacific Hydrotech has indicated will be addressed under a separate change order.

19.A.

The larger change involves rehabilitation and re-equipping of Wells 15 and 16. The original project approach anticipated rehabilitating the wells and reusing their existing equipment. Following removal of the existing equipment, N2W, City staff, and the City’s hydrogeologist evaluated the wells and determined that more extensive rehabilitation and replacement equipment were necessary to restore the wells to reliable operating condition. Staff and N2W selected stainless steel components due to their durability and anticipated longer service life under the wells' operating conditions. Although stainless steel components have a higher initial cost, their use is expected to reduce long-term maintenance and replacement requirements.

Although rehabilitation and equipping of Wells 15 and 16 are separate from construction of the treatment plant itself, these improvements are necessary to restore the wells to service and provide a reliable water supply to the new treatment facility. The City typically undertakes well rehabilitation as separate Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects approximately every five to seven years. The cost of these projects varies depending on the size and condition of each well, the extent of rehabilitation required, and the type and quantity of equipment requiring replacement. These periodic improvements are intended to maintain well performance, extend the useful life of the facilities, and support the reliability of the City's water system. Wells 15 and 16 have not been rehabilitated in over 10 years. Given the extended period since their last rehabilitation and the conditions identified during equipment removal and inspection, staff determined that completing the necessary rehabilitation and equipment replacement as part of the current project would be appropriate to support the return of both wells to service.

The proposed change order for well rehabilitation, replacement equipment, and related design and project management services totals $1,499,277.59 (Attachment No. 3).

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
 On March 23, 2021, the Council approved CIP 5717 and appropriated $5 million to the project as part of the FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program.  On December 10, 2024, the Council awarded a Design-Build agreement to Pacific Hydrotech Inc.
 On June 24, 2025, the Council received a presentation from N2W, who is a partner with Pacific Hydrotech on the treatment plant.
 On July 14, 2026, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2026–27 through Fiscal Year 2030–31 Capital Improvement Plan, which included an additional appropriation of $1,653,750 for CIP 5717.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

19.A.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no General Fund impact associated with the proposed action. CIP No. 5717, Wells 15 and 16 Treatment Plant, has a current project allocation of $7,035,170.00, as reflected in the adopted Fiscal Year 2026–27 Capital Improvement Plan.

The estimated total project cost, including the proposed contract increase and construction contingency, is summarized below:

Description Amount
Professional Services – Hydrogeologist $50,000.00
Existing Design-Build Contract $4,954,533.80
Proposed Design-Build Contract Increase $1,798,643.60
Construction Contingency (10%) $675,300.00
Total Estimated Project Cost $7,478,477.40
The proposed total project cost exceeds the current allocation by $443,307.40. To provide sufficient funding for the additional improvements and associated contingency, staff requests authorization to appropriate an additional $450,000.00 from the available Water Utility Fund (Fund 571) fund balance to CIP No. 5717.

Sufficient unallocated funds are available within the Water Utility Fund to support the proposed appropriation. Approval of the additional funding would increase the total project allocation to $7,485,170.00, providing sufficient funding for the estimated project costs and maintaining a remaining project balance of $6,692.60.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Do not approve the increase to the Pacific Hydrotech Agreement

2. Provide alternative direction to the Interim City Manager ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment No.1 - Resolution No. 2026-169
Attachment No. 2 - COR 05.5 Cartridge Filters
Attachment No. 3 - COR 07C Lynch Well Rehab Equipping

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169 1
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

CITY OF HEMET

HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN INCREASE
OF $1,798,643.60 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC

HYDROTECH CORPORATION FOR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 5717, WELL 15 AND 16

TREATMENT PLANT, TO COVER ADDITIONAL PROJECT
COSTS; AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION

EXPENDITURES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$675,300.00, REPRESENTING 10% OF THE CONTRACT
AMOUNT; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE $450,000.00
FROM THE WATER UTILITY FUND (FUND 571) FUND
BALANCE; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does hereby resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City of Hemet owns and operates a potable water distribution system serving approximately 5.25 square miles, consisting of approximately 132.3 miles of water mains, production wells, and interagency connections that provide potable water to more than 9,600 service connections; and WHEREAS, 1,2,3-Trichloropropane (TCP) is a regulated drinking water contaminant in California, with a State Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 0.005 micrograms per liter (µg/L), equivalent to 5 parts per trillion (ppt); and WHEREAS, in response to the State's TCP regulations, City Wells 15 and 16 were taken offline in 2018 after testing identified TCP concentrations exceeding the established MCL; and

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169 2
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHEREAS, City staff evaluated available treatment technologies and determined that Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) filtration is the preferred treatment method for removing TCP from the affected wells; and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2024, the City Council awarded a design-build agreement to Pacific Hydrotech, Corporation for CIP No. 5717, Wells 15 and 16 Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, Pacific Hydrotech, Corporation, its design partner N2W, and City staff have continued advancing the project design, including evaluating treatment requirements, existing well conditions, and associated infrastructure improvements; and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2025, N2W presented a project update to the City Council, and subsequent design development and field evaluations identified additional improvements necessary to support the reliable operation of the treatment facilities; and WHEREAS, additional pretreatment consisting of cartridge prefilters upstream of the GAC treatment system has been identified to protect the GAC media from sediment and other particulates, extend its useful life, and potentially reduce long-term operational and maintenance costs; and
WHEREAS, following removal and inspection of the existing well equipment, City staff, N2W, and the City's hydrogeologist determined that Wells 15 and 16 require more extensive rehabilitation and replacement equipment than originally anticipated; and WHEREAS, Pacific Hydrotech, Corporation has submitted a proposed change order in the amount of $299,366.01 for the installation of cartridge prefiltration equipment, including associated materials, equipment, design, and installation; and

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169 3
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHEREAS, Pacific Hydrotech, Corporation has submitted a proposed change order in the amount of $1,499,277.59 for rehabilitation and re-equipping of Wells 15 and 16, including associated design and project management services; and WHEREAS, the combined cost of the proposed change orders totals $1,798,643.60, increasing the design-build contract amount from $4,954,533.80 to $6,753,177.40; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends authorizing additional construction expenditures in an amount not to exceed $675,300.00 to provide a contingency for unforeseen conditions and necessary construction-related adjustments; and WHEREAS, CIP No. 5717 has an existing project allocation of $7,035,170.00, and the estimated total project cost, including the proposed contract increase and construction contingency, is $7,478,477.40; and
WHEREAS, an additional appropriation of $450,000.00 from the available Water Utility Fund (Fund 571) fund balance is necessary to provide sufficient funding for the proposed project expenditures; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available within the Water Utility Fund balance, and the proposed action will have no impact on the City's General Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169 4
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
SECTION 2. CONTRACT INCREASE. The City Council hereby approves an increase of $1,798,643.60 to the existing design-build agreement with Pacific Hydrotech, Corporation for CIP No. 5717, Wells 15 and 16 Treatment Plant, resulting in a revised contract amount of $6,753,177.40, to fund the additional prefiltration improvements, well rehabilitation, replacement equipment, and associated project costs.

SECTION 3. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY AND CITY MANAGER
AUTHORITY. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to approve and execute additional construction change orders and related expenditures for CIP No. 5717 in a cumulative amount not to exceed $675,300.00, separate from the contract increase authorized in Section 2, to address unforeseen conditions, necessary construction modifications, and other project-related improvements required for completion of the project. Such expenditures shall be subject to available project appropriations and applicable laws and City purchasing requirements. No additional City Council approval shall be required for individual change orders within the authorized contingency, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

SECTION 4. ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION. The City Council hereby authorizes the Administrative Services Director to appropriate an additional $450,000.00 from the available Water Utility Fund (Fund 571) fund balance to CIP No. 5717, increasing the total project allocation to $7,485,170.00.

SECTION 5. AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute all necessary contract

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169 5
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
amendments, change orders, and related documents with Pacific Hydrotech Corporation to implement this Resolution, consistent with the expenditure limits and appropriations authorized herein.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 2026. ____________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-169 6
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 13th day of October, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk

19.A.

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION
30590 COCHISE CIR., MURRIETA, CA 92563
(909) 943-8803 FAX (909) 943-1093
August 26, 2026
City of Hemet
445 E Florida Ave
Hemet, CA 92543
Attention: Travis Holyoak
City of Hemet
Reference: Design Build Well 15 & 16 Treatment Plant
Dear Travis,
Please see the attached COR 5.5 for the addition of the cartridge filtration system at Well 15, as reflected in the 60% and 90% design drawings.

This COR includes the costs associated with:
• Procurement of the cartridge filter equipment
• Labor and materials required to construct the cartridge filter concrete pad • Mechanical piping, fittings, and associated appurtenances required to connect the cartridge filters into the treatment system
• N2W design services associated with incorporating the cartridge filters into the project
• Reinforcing steel subcontract work associated with the cartridge filter pad.

The total price for this COR is $299,366.01 per the attached backup documentation.

Please note that this COR does not include the electrical and instrumentation scope associated with the cartridge filter addition. The electrical portion will be submitted under a separate change order request and will include the differential pressure transmitters, associated conduit and wiring, controls, and system integration required for the cartridge filtration system.

We have truly enjoyed working with you and the City of Hemet to make this a successful project. If we can answer any questions regarding this change order or any other aspect of the project, please feel free to call me anytime at 951-943-8803.

Sincerely yours,
Pacific Hydrotech Corp.

Joel Terrones
Project Engineer

19.A.

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION
314 E 3rd Street
Perris,CA 92570
(951) 943-8803

EXTRA WORK
DESCRIPTION:

PROJECT NAME:

JOB #:

DATE:

EQUIPMENT Hours Rate Total LABOR Hours Rate Total
Tool Truck 40 57.71 $ 2,308.40 Filter Pad Addition $ -
Backhoe 24 64.00 $ 1,536.00 Foreman 40 125.00 $ 5,000.00 $ - Operator 16 125.00 $ 2,000.00
$ - Carpenter 16 120.00 $ 1,920.00
$ - Laborer 40 105.00 $ 4,200.00
$ - $ -
$ - Additional Pipe Install $ -
$ - Foreman 8 125.00 $ 1,000.00
$ - Operator 8 125.00 $ 1,000.00
Subtotal $ 3,844.40 Laborer 8 105.00 $ 840.00
15% Markup 15% $ 576.66 $ -
Total Cost $ 4,421.06 $ -
MATERIAL Quant Cost Total $ -
Cartridge Filters 1 156366.58 $ 156,366.58 $ -
Ready mix concrete 1 2000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ -
WWWSCO 1 32443.93 $ 32,443.93 Subtotal $ 15,960.00
Additional Pipe, Appurtenances 1 18161.25 $ 18,161.25 20% Markup 20% $ 3,192.00 Mics Materials 1 3000.00 $ 3,000.00 Total Cost $ 19,152.00 $ -
$ - Equipment Total Cost $ 4,421.06
$ - Material Total Cost $ 243,767.52
$ - Subcontracts Total Cost $ 26,155.50
$ - Labor Total Cost $ 19,152.00
$ - Subtotal $ 293,496.08
$ - Bond 1% $ 2,934.96
$ - Insurance 1% $ 2,934.96
$ - TOTAL COSTS $ 299,366.01
Subtotal $ 211,971.76
15% Markup 15% $ 31,795.76
Total Cost $ 243,767.52
SUBCONTRACTS Unit Cost Total
Rebar 1 3535.00 $ 3,535.00
N2W 1 21375.00 $ 21,375.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Subtotal $ 24,910.00
5% Markup 5% $ 1,245.50
Total Cost $ 26,155.50
COR 05.4 Cartridge Filters Pad, Additional Piping and Valve installation 8/26/2026
Design Build Well 15 & 16 Treatment Plant
C2428

19.A.

Harrington Industrial Plastics Quotation# 012E9323
4111 Latham Street Written: JXN
Riverside CA 92501 Quote Date 07/08/26
951-784-0256 Expire Date 07/15/26
951-784-5024 Fax Page 1 OF 1
Quotation
054331 Ship To:

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION Customer Pick-Up,
30590 COCHISE CIR
MURRIETA, CA 92563-2501

Job: RFQ# CITY OF HEMET
=============================================================================== Contact: KYLE Ship Via: BEST WAY POSSIBLE
Phone#: 951-943-8803 FOB / Delivery ARO: SHIPPING POINT Fax: 951-940-8173 Frt-Terms: CHRG INBOUND & OUTBOUND
=============================================================================== Product/Description Quantity Price U/M Extension
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HUR12X170FL2 2 66605.00 EA 133,210.00
FILTER HSNG 304SS EP 1800GPM
10" FLG W/SWING BOLT CLOSURE

PRODUCT IS NON-RETURNABLE

ITEMS MAY NOT BE CANCELLED

HC/170-20 48 220.32 EA 10,575.36
30-3/4" FILTER 20 MIC PEST
PLEAT FOR MDL HUR 170HP
.
.

FREIGHT IS NOT INCLUDED
.
.
.

Harrington’s standard Terms and conditions apply. Please visit https://www.hipco.com/terms-and-conditions-sale for the full Terms and Conditions
Due to recent volatility in U.S. government tariff regulations --whether enacted or under review--all quotes remain provisional and are subject to price adjustments or surcharges. Pricing provided is valid for 24 hours from the time of the quotation and may be adjusted up until receipt of a confirmed Purchase Order and approval to proceed with production.

=============================================================================== Merchandise Tax Est.Freight / Handling Net Quote Total
=============================================================================== 143,785.36 12,581.22 0.00 156,366.58
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks For Thinking Harrington.

Respectfully Jon L. Naulls
All Quotations are subject to review upon placement of order.

Freight/Handling and applicable taxes if not listed above will be added.

Harrington standard terms and conditions apply to this quote.

19.A.

PROPOSAL
5671 GATES ST CHINO, CA - 91710
PHONE: (909)597-7000 | FAX: (909)597-7050
PROPOSAL ID QUOTE NO. DATE
C2428 CARTRIDGE FILT 10323112/11/25
LN# PRODUCT AND DESCRIPTION QTY UM PRICE TOTAL
PAGE 1
- 10" DI PIPE -
- SUBTOTAL -
- 2" AIR VAC VALVES -
- SUBTOTAL -
- 12" DI PIPE -
- SUBTOTAL -

BID TOTAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 PBVF10E 10 LSXPII FLG BUTTERFLY VLV OL BSN 250B/12 4 EA 2294.54 9178.16 17 PBVH2 MUELLER MDT-2S HANDWHEEL 3-8 VLVS W/ROLL P 4 EA 139.02 556.08 18 MF90-10 10 DI C153 MJXFLG 90 1 EA 575.85 575.85
19 SGDA-10 10 MJ RESTRAINT W/ACC DI PIPE - STAR 1 EA 124.50 124.50 20 BN10-B8M 10 B8M 316 SS B/N/W SET 150# 7/8X4 8 SET 146.40 1171.20 21 10-8-FFNA 10X1/8 150# FULL FACE NA GSKT 8 EA 17.76 142.08 22 11747.87
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 S8346NI020030# 2 X 3 S40 316/L WELD NIPPLE 4 EA 17.96 71.84 25 SSBV-200 2 SS 316 BALL VLV 2 EA 173.84 347.68
26 UL20 2 COMBO AIR VLV W/SS TRIM 1/4 AVO 20-150 P 2 EA 1472.52 2945.04 27 GL180-02 2 GALV 180 BEND 2 EA 20.23 40.46
28 HAVS-02 2 HYTECH AIR VAC BUG SCREEN MIP 2 EA 35.15 70.30 29 3475.32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 PW2X100 2X100 10 MIL PVC PIPE WRAPPING TAPE 1 EA 9.60 9.60 35 MFT-1210 12X10 DI C153 MJXFLG TEE 1 EA 801.95 801.95 36 MR-1210 12X10 DI C153 MJ RED 1 EA 268.54 268.54
37 MF90-12 12 DI C153 MJXFLG 90 1 EA 827.56 827.56
38 M90-12 12 DI C153 MJ 90 1 EA 510.00 510.00
39 SGDA-12 12 MJ RESTRAINT W/ACC DI PIPE - STAR 6 EA 167.50 1005.00 40 SGDA-10 10 MJ RESTRAINT W/ACC DI PIPE - STAR 1 EA 124.50 124.50 41 106ALS-12 12 FLG SWING CHK VLV W/RFD L&S EPOXY 1 EA 7148.73 7148.73 42 PBVF12E 12 LSXPII FLG BUTTERFLY VLV OL BSN 250B/12 1 EA 2748.63 2748.63 43 PBVH2 MUELLER MDT-2S HANDWHEEL 3-8 VLVS W/ROLL P 1 EA 139.02 139.02 44 BN12-B8M 12 B8M 316 SS B/N/W SET 150# 7/8X4 6 SET 146.40 878.40 45 12-8-FFNA 12X1/8 150# FULL FACE NA GSKT 6 EA 24.73 148.38 46 14610.31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 47 48
49 29833.50
NOTE: THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT INCLUDE SALES TAX.

Last Page

19.A.

From: [email protected]
To: Eduardo Lopez
Subject: RE: C2428 Hemet Well 15 & 16 pipe change order Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 1:49:31 PM
Attachments: image001.png
$ 16,700.00 + tax for pcs 34, 56, 34, 51, 36 (x2), 43 (x2)? Thanks
Mike Levacy
Levco Fab inc.
(909) 465-0840
From: Eduardo Lopez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 1:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: C2428 Hemet Well 15 & 16 pipe change order Mike,
Just to confirm, that Is the price for the following pieces? 34, 55, 34, 51, 36 (x2), 43 (x2)?

19.A.

\\AS-soule\Soule\co_flyer_single_EE.DOC

CHANGE ORDER
To: Pacific Hydrotech Corporation Change Order No.: 201 314 E 3rd St Date: December 18, 2025
Perris, CA 92570 Estimate No.: 03891
Job Name: WATER WELLS 15 & 16

TREATMENT PLANT

WATER RESERVOIR
Location: HEMET, CA
The following described change/extra was made to the original plans and specifications:

CARTRIDGE FILTER VESSEL SYSTEM CONCRETE PAD: [17-0L x 8-0W x 1-6T] ~ Comments: CHANGE ORDER PRICE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: MATERIAL, FABRICATION, DETAILING, FIELD LABOR, DELIVERY, MILL CERTS & TAX.

Change Order Total: $3,535.00
The said subcontract as hereby amended shall remain in full force and effect.

In witness where of the said parties have caused this agreement to be accepted and executed as of the day and year signed below.

Pacific Hydrotech Corporation Amber Steel Co.

By: By:

Print Name: Edgar Estrella
Dated: Dated: December 18, 2025

19.A.

PRINC PROJ TECH STAFF II TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION MAN ADVISOR ENGR LABOR
Client Billing Rates 285 275 295 190
COR 5 Cartridge Filters
1 Preliminary Design

1.1 Filter Sizing 1 0 0 4 5 1,045 1,045

1.2 Hydraulic Analysis 2 0 0 4 6 1,330 1,330

1.3 Cost Comparison Analysis 2 0 0 5 7 1,520 1,520

1.4 Meetings and Coordination 0 0 0 2 2 380 380
Preliminary Design Subtotal 5 0 0 15 20 4,275 4,275
2 Final Design

2.1 Design Drawing Modifications 4 2 2 16 24 5,320 5,320

2.2 Engineering Specifications 2 1 1 8 12 2,660 2,660

2.3 Submittal Reviews(Filters, Concrete pads, Rebar, Differential Pressure Transmitter) 2 2 2 6 12 2,850 2,850

2.4 Meetings and Coordination 4 2 2 4 12 3,040 3,040

2.5 Sub Costs 3,230 3,230
Final Design Subtotal 12 7 7 34 60 17,100 17,100
COR 5 Total 17 7 7 49 80 21,375 21,375
COR 7 Well Pump Replacement
1 Preliminary Design

1.1 Pump sizing and selection 2 2 2 8 14 3,230 3,230

1.2 Hydraulic Analysis 2 2 2 12 18 3,990 3,990

1.3 Existing Conditions Analysis 2 2 2 18 24 5,130 5,130

1.4 Pump Replacement and Well Rehab Recommendations 6 4 4 6 20 5,130 5,130

1.5 Meetings and Coordination 5 5 5 6 21 5,415 5,415
Preliminary Design Subtotal 17 15 15 50 97 22,895 22,895 2 Final Design

2.1 Design Drawing Modifications 4 2 2 8 16 3,800 3,800

2.2 Engineering Specifications 4 4 4 20 32 7,220 7,220

2.3 Design Calculations 4 4 4 12 24 5,700 5,700

2.4 Submittal Reviews 6 6 6 18 36 8,550 8,550

2.5 Meeting and Coordination 6 12 6 18 42 10,200 10,200

2.6 Sub Costs 19,825 19,825
Final Design Subtotal 24 28 22 76 150 55,295 55,295
COR 7 Total 41 43 37 126 247 78,190 78,190
TOTAL, hours 58 50 44 175 327 99,565 99,565
TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED, dollars 99,565 99,565
N2W Engineering
City of Hemet Wells 15 and 16 Pump Replacement and Cartriddge Filter Design Level of Effort and Fee

LEVEL OF EFFORT, HOURS FEE, DOLLARS TASK

LABOR TOTAL

19.A.

C ITY O F HEMET –N2W DESIG N SERVIC ES AMENDMENT
A B C B+C (B+C) - A
Task Name Total Original
Budget
Preliminary Design
Budget Spent Final Design Budget Total Revised
Budget Amendment
Well Pump
Replacement $0 $ 22,895.00 $ 55,295.00 $78,190.00 $ 78,190.00 Cartridge Filter
Design $0 $ 4,275.00 $ 17,100.00 $ 21,375.00 $ 21,375.00 Total $0 $ 27,170.00 $ 72,395.00 $ 99,565.00 $ 99,565.00

19.A.

16'-10" 17'-10" 19'-5" 2'-6" OF SHEETS FILE NO. SCALE: DATE: BENCHMARK: DATE: PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: City of Hemet 445 E. FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CA 92543 (951) 765-2360 City of Hemet APPROVED: ENGINEERING DIVISION EA# E# APPROVED BY: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS: NO: BY: MICHAEL GARVEY, RCE 94178 PRINCIPAL ENGINEER DATE: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY: SECTION 4216 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 811, TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. 36'-0" 36'-0" 2'-6" 18'-7" M-2 WELL 15 MECHANICAL PLAN 4240 CONSTRUCTION LEGEND WELL 15 MECHANICAL PLAN SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" B C A B C D E D A E STANDARD M-6 PIPE SUPPORT 1CROSS PIPE M-6 SUPPORT 2 59'-2" GAC-INF GAC-EFF GAC-FTW CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SEE PIPE, VALVE, AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES ON DWG M-8. PIPE SHALL BE EPOXY LINED AND COATED ONLY FOR ABOVEGROUND SECTIONS OF PIPE IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF FLOW METERS FOR METER ACCURACY. 2. DIMENSIONS FOR ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD-VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE CITY A MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF PURCHASING OR ORDERING NEW MATERIALS OR ANY INSTALLATION IN THE AREA. 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PAD. PIPE TO HAVE MINIMUM 18" CLARENCE FROM ELECTRICAL PAD. 1 4 6 5 7 8 7 8 11 12 10 20 19 16 22 27 26 28 33 34 3436 36 38 38 38 38 40 40 61 41 41 42 44 44 45 47 49 48 49 53 54 55 56 59 59 61 61 62 63 N 40 41 71 42 70 72 3'-8" 8'-10" 5'-0" 15 2 15'-0" 64 37 49 43 43 73 73 65 66 NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION 1 - ACCESS GATE ACCESS GATE TO GAC TREATMENT SYSTEM 02800 19 10" BFV-2104 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 42 8" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 59 12" REDUCER CARBON STEEL 12"X8" REDUCER 15061 2 - WALL PERIMETER WALL FOR GAC TREATMENT SYSTEM 02800 20 12" BFV-3207 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 43 12" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 61 12" REDUCER DUCTILE IRON 12"X10" REDUCER, MJ 15068 4 - P-1102 NEW 250 HP WELL 15 VERTICAL TURBINE PUMP 11062 22 12" CV-3201 SWING CHECK VALVE PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15106 44 10" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 62 - PAD CARTRIDGE FILTER VESSEL SYSTEMS CONCRETE PAD - 5 - CF-2100 CARTRIDGE FILTER SYSTEM CF-2100 11250 26 12" VC-3201 VICTAULIC COUPLING 15165 45 8" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 63 - PAD GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON SYSTEMS CONCRETE PAD - 6 - CF-2200 CARTRIDGE FILTER SYSTEM CF-2200 11250 27 - DT-2100 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 13442 47 12" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 64 10" CV-1102 SWING CHECK VALVE PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15106 7 - GAC-3100 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON VESSEL SYSTEM 3100A/B 11360 28 - DT-2200 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 13442 48 10" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 65 - - SAMPLE PORT TO EXISTING ANALZER 13442 8 - GAC-3200 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON VESSEL SYSTEM 3200A/B 11360 30 10" FE/FIT-1102 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC FLOW METER 16492 49 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 66 2" ARV-3202 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 10 2" ARV-2101 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 33 6" CAMLOCK CAMLOCK ASSEMBLY W/ FITTINGS - 51 8" PIPE CARBON STEEL WITH CORROSION PROTECTION PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 69 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, WLD X PE 15062 11 2" ARV-2102 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 34 12" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 52 12" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 12"x10" REDUCING ELBOW 15061 70 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, FLG'D 15062 12 2" ARV-2103 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 36 10" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 53 12" TEE CARBON STEEL 12"X12"X12" STANDARD TEE 15061 71 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, FLG'D X MJ WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS 15062 15 8" FE/FIT-3202 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC FLOW METER 16492 37 10" PIPE CARBON STEEL WITH CORROSION PROTECTION PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 54 8" TEE CARBON STEEL 8"X8"X8" STANDARD TEE 15061 72 8" PIPE DUCTILE IRON PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15062 16 10" BFV-2101 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 38 8" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 55 12" TEE DUCTILE IRON 12"X12"X12" STANDARD TEE, MJ 15068 73 1" PIPE CPVC PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15067 17 10" BFV-2102 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 40 12" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 56 12" TEE CARBON STEEL 12"X12"X10" REDUCING TEE 15061 74 2" ARV-3203 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 18 10" BFV-2103 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 41 10" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 58 12" TEE DUCTILE IRON 12"X12"X10" REDUCING TEE, MJ 15068 2 2 36 36 44 48 17 58 40 34 18 FM-4 69 45 18" MIN *NOTE 3 51 74 34 51 52 30 REUSE ROLLING GATE, IF VIABLE TIE IN NEW WALL TO EXISTING WALL TIE IN NEW WALL TO EXISTING WALL JILLEEN FERRIS, RCE 86193 PUBLIC WORK DIRECTOR DATE: CITY ENGINEER M-3 M-4 M-4 M-4 M-3 3024

19.A.

0'-0" (GROUND LEVEL) 19'-10" (CL OF PIPE) 8'-4" (TOP OF WALL) 8'-4" (CL OF PIPE) 6'-6" (CL OF PIPE) 4'-5" (CL OF PIPE) 2'-7" (CL OF PIPE) -3'-7" (CL OF PIPE) OF SHEETS FILE NO. SCALE: DATE: BENCHMARK: DATE: PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: City of Hemet 445 E. FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CA 92543 (951) 765-2360 City of Hemet APPROVED: ENGINEERING DIVISION EA# E# APPROVED BY: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS: NO: BY: MICHAEL GARVEY, RCE 94178 PRINCIPAL ENGINEER DATE: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY: SECTION 4216 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 811, TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. M-3 WELL 15 SECTIONS I 44 71 47 CONSTRUCTION LEGEND 0'-0" (GROUND LEVEL) 19'-10" (CL OF PIPE) 8'-4" (TOP OF WALL) 8'-4" (CL OF PIPE) 6'-6" (CL OF PIPE) 4'-5" (CL OF PIPE) 2'-7" (CL OF PIPE) -3'-7" (CL OF PIPE) SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" MECHANICAL SECTION A AM-2 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" MECHANICAL SECTION B BM-2 STANDARD PIPE SUPPORT 1M-6 STANDARD PIPE SUPPORT 1M-6 CROSS PIPE SUPPORT 2M-6 CROSS PIPE SUPPORT 2M-6 PIPE PENETRATION THROUGH FLOOR (TYP.) 4M-6 BURIED PIPE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYP.) 5M-6 BURIED PIPE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYP.) 5M-6 GAC-FTW GAC-INF GAC-EFF GAC-BBW CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SEE PIPE, VALVE, AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES ON DWG M-8. PIPE SHALL BE EPOXY LINED AND COATED ONLY FOR ABOVEGROUND SECTIONS OF PIPE IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF FLOW METERS FOR METER ACCURACY. 2. DIMENSIONS FOR ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD-VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE CITY A MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF PURCHASING OR ORDERING NEW MATERIALS OR ANY INSTALLATION IN THE AREA. 3. RUN CVPC CHEMICAL INJECTION LINE TO INJECTION QUILL ALONG GAC-EFF PIPE. 49 2 2 2 4 6 5 6 7 8 8 8 11 12 11 12 10 17 17 16 22 26 28 27 28 31 33 33 34 50 34 35 35 36 36 36 36 38 38 38 38 38 38 4148 42 40 43 44 44 44 47 48 47 58 63 62 63 62 40 42 49 40 48 69 72 72 GAC-BWI GAC-EFF 37 51 55 1'-6" (CL OF PIPE) 64 30 PIPE PENETRATION THROUGH FLOOR (TYP.) 4M-6 43 43 34 34 47 47 PIPE PENETRATION THROUGH FLOOR (TYP.) 4M-6 24 65 66 NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION 1 - ACCESS GATE ACCESS GATE TO GAC TREATMENT SYSTEM 02800 40 12" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 2 - WALL PERIMETER WALL FOR GAC TREATMENT SYSTEM 02800 41 10" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 4 - P-1102 NEW 250 HP WELL 15 VERTICAL TURBINE PUMP 11062 42 8" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 5 - CF-2100 CARTRIDGE FILTER SYSTEM CF-2100 11250 43 12" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 6 - CF-2200 CARTRIDGE FILTER SYSTEM CF-2200 11250 44 10" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 7 - GAC-3100 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON VESSEL SYSTEM 3100A/B 11360 45 8" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 8 - GAC-3200 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON VESSEL SYSTEM 3200A/B 11360 47 12" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 10 2" ARV-2101 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 48 10" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 11 2" ARV-2102 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 49 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 12 2" ARV-2103 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 50 8" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 45° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 15 8" FE/FIT-3202 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC FLOW METER 16492 51 8" PIPE CARBON STEEL WITH CORROSION PROTECTION PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 16 10" BFV-2101 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 53 12" TEE CARBON STEEL 12"X12"X12" STANDARD TEE 15061 17 10" BFV-2102 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 54 8" TEE CARBON STEEL 8"X8"X8" STANDARD TEE 15061 20 12" BFV-3207 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 55 12" TEE DUCTILE IRON 12"X12"X12" STANDARD TEE, MJ 15068 22 12" CV-3201 SWING CHECK VALVE PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15106 58 12" TEE DUCTILE IRON 12"X12"X10" REDUCING TEE, MJ 15068 24 - CI-3201 CHEMICAL INJECTION QUILL 11260 59 12" REDUCER CARBON STEEL 12"X8" REDUCER 15061 26 12" VC-3201 VICTAULIC COUPLING 15165 62 - PAD CARTRIDGE FILTER VESSEL SYSTEMS CONCRETE PAD - 27 - DT-2100 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 13442 63 - PAD GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON SYSTEMS CONCRETE PAD - 28 - DT-2200 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 13442 64 10" CV-1102 SWING CHECK VALVE PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15106 30 10" FE/FIT-1102 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC FLOW METER 16492 65 - - SAMPLE PORT TO EXISTING ANALZER 13442 31 12" FE/FIT-3201 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC FLOW METER 16492 66 2" ARV-3202 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 33 6" CAMLOCK CAMLOCK ASSEMBLY W/ FITTINGS - 69 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, WLD X PE 15062 34 12" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 70 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, FLG'D 15062 35 12" PIPE CARBON STEEL WITH CORROSION PROTECTION PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 71 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, FLG'D X MJ WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS 15062 36 10" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 72 8" PIPE DUCTILE IRON PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15062 37 10" PIPE CARBON STEEL WITH CORROSION PROTECTION PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 73 1" PIPE CPVC PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15067 38 8" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 74 2" ARV-3203 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 49 59 59 GAC-INF 73 70 73 535354 54 34 34 34 34 58 3443 66 45 74 74 38 1 2045 45 15 51 38 38 43 43 2 49 3'-3" (CL OF PIPE) 3'-3" (CL OF PIPE) JILLEEN FERRIS, RCE 86193 PUBLIC WORK DIRECTOR DATE: CITY ENGINEER 3025

19.A.

OF SHEETS FILE NO. SCALE: DATE: BENCHMARK: DATE: PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: City of Hemet 445 E. FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CA 92543 (951) 765-2360 City of Hemet APPROVED: ENGINEERING DIVISION EA# E# APPROVED BY: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: REVISIONS: NO: BY: MICHAEL GARVEY, RCE 94178 PRINCIPAL ENGINEER DATE: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY: SECTION 4216 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE ISSUED BEFORE A "PERMIT TO EXCAVATE" WILL BE VALID. FOR YOUR DIG ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 811, TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG. M-4 WELL 15 SECTIONS II 0'-0" (GROUND LEVEL) 19'-10" (CL OF PIPE) -3'-7" (CL OF PIPE) 8 8 CONSTRUCTION LEGEND 8 8 2 0'-0" (GROUND LEVEL) 19'-10" (CL OF PIPE) 8'-4" (TOP OF WALL) 8'-4" (CL OF PIPE) 6'-6" (CL OF PIPE) 4'-5" (CL OF PIPE) 2'-7" (CL OF PIPE) -3'-7" (CL OF PIPE) SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" MECHANICAL SECTION C CM-2 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" MECHANICAL SECTION D DM-2 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" MECHANICAL SECTION E EM-2 8'-4" (TOP OF FENCE) BURIED PIPE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYP.) M-65 GAC-INF GAC-BBW GAC-INF CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SEE PIPE, VALVE, AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES ON DWG M-8. PIPE SHALL BE EPOXY LINED AND COATED ONLY FOR ABOVEGROUND SECTIONS OF PIPE IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF FLOW METERS FOR METER ACCURACY. 2. DIMENSIONS FOR ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, PIPING, AND OTHER ITEMS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD-VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE CITY A MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF PURCHASING OR ORDERING NEW MATERIALS OR ANY INSTALLATION IN THE AREA. GAC-EFF 2 2 2 4 6 5 10 18 16 19 22 28 27 34 34 36 36 36 40 42 44 44 44 45 47 47 48 48 52 55 56 61 58 63 63 63 8 8 41 PIPE PENETRATION THROUGH FLOOR (TYP.) M-64 71 NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION NO. SIZE NAME DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION 1 - ACCESS GATE ACCESS GATE TO GAC TREATMENT SYSTEM 02800 19 10" BFV-2104 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 43 12" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 62 - PAD CARTRIDGE FILTER VESSEL SYSTEMS CONCRETE PAD - 2 - WALL PERIMETER WALL FOR GAC TREATMENT SYSTEM 02800 20 12" BFV-3207 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 44 10" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 63 - PAD GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON SYSTEMS CONCRETE PAD - 4 - P-1102 NEW 250 HP WELL 15 VERTICAL TURBINE PUMP 11062 22 12" CV-3201 SWING CHECK VALVE PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15106 45 8" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW 15061 65 - - SAMPLE PORT TO EXISTING ANALZER 13442 5 - CF-2100 CARTRIDGE FILTER SYSTEM CF-2100 11250 27 - DT-2100 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 13442 47 12" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 66 2" ARV-3202 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 6 - CF-2200 CARTRIDGE FILTER SYSTEM CF-2200 11250 28 - DT-2200 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 13442 48 10" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 71 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, FLG'D X MJ WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS 15062 8 - GAC-3200 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON VESSEL SYSTEM 3200A/B 11360 33 6" CAMLOCK CAMLOCK ASSEMBLY W/ FITTINGS - 49 8" ELBOW DUCTILE IRON 90° SHORT RADIUS ELBOW, MJ 15068 72 8" PIPE DUCTILE IRON PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15062 10 2" ARV-2101 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 34 12" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 51 8" PIPE CARBON STEEL WITH CORROSION PROTECTION PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 74 2" ARV-3203 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 11 2" ARV-2102 AIR RELEASE VALVE PER DWG M-6, DTL 3 AND VALVE SCHEDULE 15114 36 10" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 52 12" ELBOW CARBON STEEL 12"x10" REDUCING ELBOW 15061 15 8" FE/FIT-3202 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC FLOW METER 16492 38 8" PIPE CARBON STEEL PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15061 55 12" TEE DUCTILE IRON 12"X12"X12" STANDARD TEE, MJ 15068 16 10" BFV-2101 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 40 12" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 56 12" TEE CARBON STEEL 12"X12"X10" REDUCING TEE 15061 17 10" BFV-2102 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 41 10" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 58 12" TEE DUCTILE IRON 12"X12"X10" REDUCING TEE, MJ 15068 18 10" BFV-2103 BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL PER VALVE SCHEDULE 15103 42 8" PIPE PVC C-900 PER PIPE SCHEDULE 15068 61 12" REDUCER DUCTILE IRON 12"X10" REDUCER, MJ 15068 15 47 41 47 5'-0" (CL OF PIPE) SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" CARTRIDGE FILTER DRAINAGE PLAN FM-2 GV-2104 GV-2102 FROM VESSEL LOWER DRAIN FROM VESSEL LOWER DRAIN FROM VESSEL SIDEWALL DRAIN/GV-2101; AIR GAP TO DRAIN FUNNEL FROM VESSEL SIDEWALL DRAIN/GV-2103; AIR GAP TO DRAIN FUNNEL CARTRIDGE FILTER HOUSING FOOTING (TYP.) PATH 2" DRAIN LINE BEHIND FILTERS 2" CAMLOCK WITH CAP PIPE PENETRATION THROUGH FLOOR (TYP.) 4M-6 49 PIPE PENETRATION THROUGH FLOOR (TYP.) M-64 66 74 43 51 36 49 38 62 34 43 2 GAC-EFF 61 47 40 42 344365 2 4334 42 36 55 48 6236 11 20 33 17 36 66 49 72 47 36 16 44 74 3'-3" (CL OF PIPE) 3'-3" (CL OF PIPE) JILLEEN FERRIS, RCE 86193 PUBLIC WORK DIRECTOR DATE: CITY ENGINEER 3026

19.A.

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION
314 E. 3rd STREET, PERRIS, CA 92570
(909) 943-8803 FAX (909) 943-1093
9/23/2026
City of Hemet
445 E Florida Ave
Hemet, CA 92543
Attention: Travis Holyoak
City of Hemet
Reference: Design Build Well 15 & 16 Treatment Plant
Dear Travis,
Please see the attached COR 07C Revision 2 for Lynch to perform the rehabilitation and re-equipping of Wells 15 and 16. The total price for this COR is $1,499,277.59 and a 357 calendar day time extension per the attached backup documents.

Attached are the supporting cost proposals for the rehabilitation work based on the City of Hemet Hydrogeologist's Well 15 and Well 16 Assessment Reports, as well as the costs associated with furnishing and installing the well pumping equipment in accordance with Specification 11062 – Vertical Turbine Pumps.

Per Lynch, the overall scope of work and execution approach remain generally consistent with our previous submissions. The primary revision to the equipment scope is the decision to utilize stainless steel column pipe, which has been incorporated into the updated pricing.

The addition of the rehabilitation work and well equipping activities for Wells 15 and 16 extends the Contract Time by 357 calendar days per the attached updated project schedule. This moves the Contract Completion Date to August 18, 2027.

In addition to the direct construction and equipment costs, this change order includes the substantial project management, engineering, design, and administrative effort required to successfully incorporate this significant scope increase into an active design-build project.

These professional services represent the additional office and management resources necessary to develop the revised design, coordinate procurement, maintain project controls, administer the expanded scope, and manage the resulting 357-day extension to the project schedule.

Please note that this pricing does not include any potential modifications to the existing well pedestals or soleplates/baseplates at Wells 15 and 16. We will not know if modifications will be required until the vertical turbine pumps have been approved and

19.A.

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION
314 E. 3rd STREET, PERRIS, CA 92570
(909) 943-8803 FAX (909) 943-1093
the manufacturer's final anchorage calculations have been completed. If modifications are necessary, we will incorporate that into a future change order.

We have truly enjoyed working with you and the City of Hemet to make this a successful project. If we can answer any questions regarding this change order or any other aspect of the project, please feel free to call me anytime at 951-943-8803.

Sincerely yours,
Pacific Hydrotech Corp.

Heath Chehey
Project Manager

19.A.

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION
314 E 3rd Street
Perris,CA 92570
(951) 943-8803

EXTRA WORK
DESCRIPTION:

PROJECT NAME:

JOB #:

DATE:

EQUIPMENT Hours Rate Total LABOR Hours Rate Total
$ - Project Manager 300 150.00 $ 45,000.00
$ - Project Coordinator 375 100.00 $ 37,500.00
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
Subtotal $ - $ -
15% Markup 15% $ - $ -
Total Cost $ - $ -
MATERIAL Quant Cost Total $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - Subtotal $ 82,500.00
$ - 20% Markup 20% $ 16,500.00
$ - Total Cost $ 99,000.00
$ -
$ - Equipment Total Cost $ -
$ - Material Total Cost $ -
$ - Subcontracts Total Cost $ 1,429,703.52
$ - Labor Total Cost $ 99,000.00
$ - Subtotal $ 1,528,703.52
$ - Bond 1% $ 15,287.04
$ - Insurance 1% $ 15,287.04
$ - TOTAL COSTS $ 1,559,277.59
Subtotal $ -
15% Markup 15% $ - $ (60,000.00)
Total Cost $ -
SUBCONTRACTS Unit Cost Total $ 1,499,277.59
Well #15 Rehabilitation 1 71110.20 $ 71,110.20
Well #16 Rehabilitation 1 156580.20 $ 156,580.20
Well #15 Equipping 1 491236.00 $ 491,236.00
Well #16 Equipping 1 564506.00 $ 564,506.00
N2W Engineering 1 78190.00 $ 78,190.00
$ -
Subtotal $ 1,361,622.40
5% Markup 5% $ 68,081.12
Total Cost $ 1,429,703.52
Deduct Bid Items 8.03, 8.04, 8.07 & 8.08

TOTAL CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT
COR 07C Rev 2 Option 3 Lynch Rehab & Well Equipping and Time Extension 9/23/2026
Design Build Well 15 & 16 Treatment Plant
C2428

19.A.

3777 Industrial Ave. Hemet, CA 92543 | 951-765-3712
WELL 15
ITE
M
No

DESCRIPTION UNI
T

ESTIMATE
D

QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE

EXTENDED
ITEM
AMOUNT
1 Mobilization, Demobilization,
and Site Cleanup. (not to
exceed 5% of total bid)
LS 1
2 Provide Solids and Waste
Water Disposal, Including
Temporary Discharge
Conveyance and Erosion
Control. Compliant with NPDES
Requirements.

LS 1
3 Mechanical Cleaning with
Spirally-Wound Nylon Brushes
Per Hydrogeologist Work Plan
HR 20
4 Dual-Cam Downhole Video
Surveys Post Rehabilitation. EA 1
5 Removal of Sediment and
Debris from bottom of well
prior to cleaning. Approx 30ft.
per Hydrogeologist work plan.

HR 36
6 Removal of Sediment and
Debris from bottom of well
post cleaning per
Hydrogeologist Work Plan
HR 12
7 Well Disinfection per
Hydrogeologist work plan LS 1
TOTAL BASE BID (numbers)
Water Wastewater Department | Travis Holyoak
700.00 14,000.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
709.00 25,524.00
850.00 10,200.00
8,500.00 8,500.00
7,500.00 7,500.00
3,386.20 3,386.20
71,110.20

19.A.

WELL 16
ITE
M
No

DESCRIPTION UNIT

ESTIMATE
D

QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE

EXTENDED
ITEM
AMOUNT
1 Mobilization, Demobilization,
and Site Cleanup. (not to
exceed 5% of total bid)
LS 1
2 Provide Solids and Waste
Water Disposal, Including
Temporary Discharge
Conveyance and Erosion
Control Compliant with NPDES
Requirements.

LS 1
3 Retrieval of Submersible Pump
at bottom of well HR 24
4 Mechanical Cleaning with
Spirally-Wound Nylon Brushes
Per Hydrogeologist Work Plan
HR 20
5 Focus Intake Pumping per
Hydrogeologist Work Plan LS 1
6 Chemical Treatment per
Hydrogeologist Work Plan LS 1
7 Dual-Cam Downhole Video
Surveys Post Rehabilitation. EA 1
8 Removal of Sediment and
Debris from bottom of well
prior to cleaning. Approx. 20ft.
per Hydrogeologist work plan.

HR 36
9 Removal of Sediment and
Debris from bottom of well
post cleaning per
Hydrogeologist Work Plan
HR 12
Water Wastewater Department | Travis Holyoak
7,500.00 7,500.00
525.00 12,600.00
700.00 14,000.00
38,950.00 38,950.00
29,850.00 29,850.00
2,000.00 2,000.00
709.00 25,524.00
850.00 10,200.00
7,455.00 7,456.20

19.A.

3777 Industrial Ave. Hemet, CA 92543 | 951-765-3712
WELL 16
ITE
M
No

DESCRIPTION UNIT

ESTIMATE
D

QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE

EXTENDED
ITEM
AMOUNT
10 Well Disinfection per
Hydrogeologist work plan LS 1
TOTAL BASE BID (numbers)
8,500.00 8,500.00
156,580.20

19.A.

Pump Estimate
Date
2/25/2026
Estimate #
23648
Name / Address
City of Hemet
Attn Accounts Payable
445 E. Florida Ave.

Hemet, CA 92543-4209
Ship To
Rep
PL
Phone #
951-634-3103
Signature
Total
Customer Phone
951-634-3103
Customer Fax
951-765-2493
THE FOLLOWING APPLIES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED: Any item not specifically mentioned is not included nor was it intended. Delivery/shipment is estimated and L.O. Lynch is not responsible for delays beyond their reasonable control.

Prices DO NOT include special equipment (if required) or freight. This quote is firm for 30 days from above date. L.O. Lynch takes complete and total exception to any requirements, plans and/or specifications not provided to company for review.

Interest will begin to accrue 10 days after date of Invoice at a rate of 1-1/2% per month. If any legal action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Contract is brought by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party will be entitled to receive from the other party, in addition to any other relief that may be granted, the reasonable attorney's fee, costs and expenses incurred in the action or proceeding by the prevailing party. 951-654-7724 Toll Free 888-654-7724 Fax 951-654-2060
A credit card convenience fee up to 3.0%
will be applied to all transactions.

This fee is charged to cover the costs
associated with credit card processing.

E-Checks and Debit cards may be subject
to lower fees- Please call 951-654-7724 to
pay with E-Check or Debit Cards.

Cash is always accepted.

Item Description Qty U/M Cost Total
CONDITION4 SCOPE OF WORK TO BE DONE: 0.00 0.00

PRICING LISTED BELOW IS FOR THE PUMP EQUIPMENT
FOR WELL 15 WITH STAINLESS STEEL OPTION
DESIGN GPM 1200 TDH 610 1 ea 0.00 0.00
12CHC - 9 GOULDS 12CHC 9 STAGE OIL LUBE TURBINE WITH S/S IMPELLERS NSF61 CERTIFIED
1 ea 35,067.00 35,067.00
HO250V2SLHX 250HP U.S. PREMIUM EFF WITH 175% EXTRA HIGH THRUST
1 ea 30,611.00 30,611.00
CTS103X1.9375 10" X 3" X 1-15/16" .365 316 S/S X 20' BUTT SEAMLESS 20 ea 10,713.00 214,260.00 CTS103X1.9375 10" X 3" X 1-15/16" .365 316 S/S X 10' BUTT SEAMLESS 1 ea 7,498.00 7,498.00 OT3X1-15/16 TUBE & SHAFT ASSY 3" X 1-15/16" X 20' 416SS WITH A53 OT ERW 416SS SHAFT/COUPLING C89835 LSB
20 ea 6,138.00 122,760.00
OT3X1-15/16 TUBE & SHAFT ASSY 3" X 1-15/16" X 10' 416SS WITH A53 OT ERW 416SS SHAFT/COUPLING C89835 LSB
1 ea 3,620.00 3,620.00
SPIDER 10" X 3" NSF CERTIFIED BLACK WIDOW SPIDERS 11 ea 95.00 1,045.00 SUCTION/WS... 8' 316SS SUCTION PIPE WITH SS CONE STRAINER TO TERMINATE AT 509' BGS
1 ea 11,255.00 11,255.00
HEAD ASSEM... 10" NSF CERTIFIED 134 EPOXY COATED DISCHARGE

HEAD ASSEMBLY
1 ea 17,500.00 17,500.00
AIRLINE 1/4" S/S AIRLINE 415 ft 10.00 4,150.00
FT12510 1-1/4" FLUSH THREAD SOUNDING TUBE NSF CERTIFIED 830 ea 9.00 7,470.00

SHOP LABOR SHOP LABOR TIME TO PREP PUMP EQUIPMENT AND

MACHINE NEW HEADSHAFT
1 hr 4,500.00 4,500.00
LPS200 LABOR - TO INSTALL NEW TURBINE PUMP EQUIPMENT 1 hr 16,500.00 16,500.00 FACTORY FACTORY TESTING ( BOWL ASSEMBLY ) 1 ea 8,500.00 8,500.00

19.A.

Pump Estimate
Date
2/25/2026
Estimate #
23648
Name / Address
City of Hemet
Attn Accounts Payable
445 E. Florida Ave.

Hemet, CA 92543-4209
Ship To
Rep
PL
Phone #
951-634-3103
Signature
Total
Customer Phone
951-634-3103
Customer Fax
951-765-2493
THE FOLLOWING APPLIES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED: Any item not specifically mentioned is not included nor was it intended. Delivery/shipment is estimated and L.O. Lynch is not responsible for delays beyond their reasonable control.

Prices DO NOT include special equipment (if required) or freight. This quote is firm for 30 days from above date. L.O. Lynch takes complete and total exception to any requirements, plans and/or specifications not provided to company for review.

Interest will begin to accrue 10 days after date of Invoice at a rate of 1-1/2% per month. If any legal action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Contract is brought by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party will be entitled to receive from the other party, in addition to any other relief that may be granted, the reasonable attorney's fee, costs and expenses incurred in the action or proceeding by the prevailing party. 951-654-7724 Toll Free 888-654-7724 Fax 951-654-2060
A credit card convenience fee up to 3.0%
will be applied to all transactions.

This fee is charged to cover the costs
associated with credit card processing.

E-Checks and Debit cards may be subject
to lower fees- Please call 951-654-7724 to
pay with E-Check or Debit Cards.

Cash is always accepted.

Item Description Qty U/M Cost Total
START UP WELL START UP AFTER INSTALL IS COMPLETE 1 ea 6,500.00 6,500.00 PREPAREDBY Respectfully,
Phil Lucas Sales Manager
951-858-0181
[email protected]
1 ea 0.00 0.00

_____________________________________
$491,236.00

19.A.

Pump Estimate
Date
2/25/2026
Estimate #
23650
Name / Address
City of Hemet
Attn Accounts Payable
445 E. Florida Ave.

Hemet, CA 92543-4209
Ship To
Rep
PL
Phone #
951-634-3103
Signature
Total
Customer Phone
951-634-3103
Customer Fax
951-765-2493
THE FOLLOWING APPLIES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED: Any item not specifically mentioned is not included nor was it intended. Delivery/shipment is estimated and L.O. Lynch is not responsible for delays beyond their reasonable control.

Prices DO NOT include special equipment (if required) or freight. This quote is firm for 30 days from above date. L.O. Lynch takes complete and total exception to any requirements, plans and/or specifications not provided to company for review.

Interest will begin to accrue 10 days after date of Invoice at a rate of 1-1/2% per month. If any legal action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Contract is brought by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party will be entitled to receive from the other party, in addition to any other relief that may be granted, the reasonable attorney's fee, costs and expenses incurred in the action or proceeding by the prevailing party. 951-654-7724 Toll Free 888-654-7724 Fax 951-654-2060
A credit card convenience fee up to 3.0%
will be applied to all transactions.

This fee is charged to cover the costs
associated with credit card processing.

E-Checks and Debit cards may be subject
to lower fees- Please call 951-654-7724 to
pay with E-Check or Debit Cards.

Cash is always accepted.

Item Description Qty U/M Cost Total
CONDITION4 SCOPE OF WORK TO BE DONE: 0.00 0.00

PRICING LISTED BELOW IS FOR THE PUMP EQUIPMENT
FOR WELL 16 WITH STAINLESS STEEL OPTION
DESIGN GPM 1100 TDH 665 1 ea 0.00 0.00
12CHC - 9 GOULDS 12CHC 9 STAGE OIL LUBE TURBINE WITH S/S IMPELLERS NSF61 CERTIFIED
1 ea 35,067.00 35,067.00
HO250V2SLHX 250HP U.S. PREMIUM EFF WITH 175% EXTRA HIGH THRUST
1 ea 30,611.00 30,611.00
CTS103X1.9375 10" X 3" X 1-15/16" .365 316 S/S X 20' BUTT SEAMLESS 25 ea 10,713.00 267,825.00 OT3X1-15/16 TUBE & SHAFT ASSY 3" X 1-15/16" X 20' 416SS WITH A53 OT ERW 416SS SHAFT/COUPLING C89835 LSB
25 ea 6,138.00 153,450.00
SPIDER 10" X 3" NSF CERTIFIED BLACK WIDOW SPIDERS 13 ea 95.00 1,235.00 SUCTION/WS... 8' X 10' CPF NSF61 CERTIFIED SUCTION PIPE WITH SS

CONE STRAINER
1 ea 4,678.00 4,678.00
HEAD ASSEM... 10" NSF CERTIFIED 134 EPOXY COATED DISCHARGE

HEAD ASSEMBLY
1 ea 17,500.00 17,500.00
AIRLINE 1/4" S/S AIRLINE 505 ft 10.00 5,050.00
FT12510 1-1/4" FLUSH THREAD SOUNDING TUBE NSF CERTIFIED 1010 ea 9.00 9,090.00

SHOP LABOR SHOP LABOR TIME TO PREP PUMP EQUIPMENT AND

MACHINE NEW HEADSHAFT
1 hr 4,500.00 4,500.00
LPS200 LABOR - TO INSTALL NEW TURBINE PUMP EQUIPMENT 1 hr 20,500.00 20,500.00 FACTORY FACTORY TESTING ( BOWL ASSEMBLY ) 1 ea 8,500.00 8,500.00 START UP WELL START UP AFTER INSTALL IS COMPLETE 1 ea 6,500.00 6,500.00

19.A.

Pump Estimate
Date
2/25/2026
Estimate #
23650
Name / Address
City of Hemet
Attn Accounts Payable
445 E. Florida Ave.

Hemet, CA 92543-4209
Ship To
Rep
PL
Phone #
951-634-3103
Signature
Total
Customer Phone
951-634-3103
Customer Fax
951-765-2493
THE FOLLOWING APPLIES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED: Any item not specifically mentioned is not included nor was it intended. Delivery/shipment is estimated and L.O. Lynch is not responsible for delays beyond their reasonable control.

Prices DO NOT include special equipment (if required) or freight. This quote is firm for 30 days from above date. L.O. Lynch takes complete and total exception to any requirements, plans and/or specifications not provided to company for review.

Interest will begin to accrue 10 days after date of Invoice at a rate of 1-1/2% per month. If any legal action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Contract is brought by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party will be entitled to receive from the other party, in addition to any other relief that may be granted, the reasonable attorney's fee, costs and expenses incurred in the action or proceeding by the prevailing party. 951-654-7724 Toll Free 888-654-7724 Fax 951-654-2060
A credit card convenience fee up to 3.0%
will be applied to all transactions.

This fee is charged to cover the costs
associated with credit card processing.

E-Checks and Debit cards may be subject
to lower fees- Please call 951-654-7724 to
pay with E-Check or Debit Cards.

Cash is always accepted.

Item Description Qty U/M Cost Total
PREPAREDBY Respectfully,
Phil Lucas Sales Manager
951-858-0181
[email protected]
1 ea 0.00 0.00

_____________________________________
$564,506.00

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET – N2W DESIGN SERVICES AMENDMENT
N2W Design Services Amendment
Water Well 15 & 16
Treatment Plant
Prepared for:

CITY OF HEMET

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
445 E. Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 95243
Prepared by:
3240 El Camino Real, Suite 120
Irvine, California 92602
Contact: Greg Guillen, PhD, PE
[email protected]
(909) 557-0852

19.A.

PRINC PROJ TECH STAFF II TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION MAN ADVISOR ENGR LABOR
Client Billing Rates 285 275 295 190
COR 5 Cartridge Filters
1 Preliminary Design

1.1 Filter Sizing 1 0 0 4 5 1,045 1,045

1.2 Hydraulic Analysis 2 0 0 4 6 1,330 1,330

1.3 Cost Comparison Analysis 2 0 0 5 7 1,520 1,520

1.4 Meetings and Coordination 0 0 0 2 2 380 380
Preliminary Design Subtotal 5 0 0 15 20 4,275 4,275
2 Final Design

2.1 Design Drawing Modifications 4 2 2 16 24 5,320 5,320

2.2 Engineering Specifications 2 1 1 8 12 2,660 2,660

2.3 Submittal Reviews(Filters, Concrete pads, Rebar, Differential Pressure Transmitter) 2 2 2 6 12 2,850 2,850

2.4 Meetings and Coordination 4 2 2 4 12 3,040 3,040

2.5 Sub Costs 3,230 3,230
Final Design Subtotal 12 7 7 34 60 17,100 17,100
COR 5 Total 17 7 7 49 80 21,375 21,375
COR 7 Well Pump Replacement
1 Preliminary Design

1.1 Pump sizing and selection 2 2 2 8 14 3,230 3,230

1.2 Hydraulic Analysis 2 2 2 12 18 3,990 3,990

1.3 Existing Conditions Analysis 2 2 2 18 24 5,130 5,130

1.4 Pump Replacement and Well Rehab Recommendations 6 4 4 6 20 5,130 5,130

1.5 Meetings and Coordination 5 5 5 6 21 5,415 5,415
Preliminary Design Subtotal 17 15 15 50 97 22,895 22,895 2 Final Design

2.1 Design Drawing Modifications 4 2 2 8 16 3,800 3,800

2.2 Engineering Specifications 4 4 4 20 32 7,220 7,220

2.3 Design Calculations 4 4 4 12 24 5,700 5,700

2.4 Submittal Reviews 6 6 6 18 36 8,550 8,550

2.5 Meeting and Coordination 6 12 6 18 42 10,200 10,200

2.6 Sub Costs 19,825 19,825
Final Design Subtotal 24 28 22 76 150 55,295 55,295
COR 7 Total 41 43 37 126 247 78,190 78,190
TOTAL, hours 58 50 44 175 327 99,565 99,565
TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED, dollars 99,565 99,565
N2W Engineering
City of Hemet Wells 15 and 16 Pump Replacement and Cartriddge Filter Design Level of Effort and Fee

LEVEL OF EFFORT, HOURS FEE, DOLLARS TASK

LABOR TOTAL

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET – N2W DESIGN SERVICES AMENDMENT
N2W requests an amendment of $99,565.00 for the following items:

1. Preliminary Design
a. Tasks not in design scope:
i. Well pump replacement

1. Existing conditions analysis

2. Hydraulic calculations

3. Meetings and Coordination
ii. Addition of cartridge filters

1. Sizing

2. Hydraulic analysis

3. Cost comparison analysis

4. Design drawings

2. Final Design
a. Tasks not in design scope:
i. Well pump replacement

1. Design drawings

2. Submittal review

3. Specifications

4. Meetings and coordination
ii. Addition of cartridge filters

1. Design drawings

2. Submittal review

3. Specifications

4. Meetings and coordination

19.A.

CITY OF HEMET – N2W DESIGN SERVICES AMENDMENT
A B C B+C (B+C) - A
Task Name Total Original
Budget
Preliminary Design
Budget Spent Final Design Budget Total Revised Budget Amendment Well Pump
Replacement $0 $ 22,895.00 $ 55,295.00 $78,190.00 $ 78,190.00 Cartridge Filter
Design $0 $ 4,275.00 $ 17,100.00 $ 21,375.00 $ 21,375.00 Total $0 $ 27,170.00 $ 72,395.00 $ 99,565.00 $ 99,565.00

19.A.

08.03 REHABILITATE WELL PUMP 15 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00

08.04 PUMP 15 DISINFECTION 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00

08.05 PULL AND ASSESS PUMP 16 20,000.00 20000.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 20000.00 100.00 0.00 1,000.00

08.06 PERF VIDEO SURVEY&DETER. PUMP16
CSNG INT 5,000.00 5000.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 5000.00 100.00 0.00 250.00

08.07 REHABILITATE WELL PUMP 16 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00

08.08 PUMP 16 DISINFECTION 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00

08.09 WELL 15 & 16 PIPE CONNECTION 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00

08.10 DELIVER VALVES/MECHS 58,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,000.00 0.00

08.11 INSTALL VALVES/MECHS 23,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,000.00 0.00

08.12 DELIVER AG/BG STEEL PIPE &
FITTINGS 27,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,000.00 0.00

08.13 INSTALL AG/BG STEEL PIPE &
FITTINGS 32,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,000.00 0.00

08.14 PAINT ABOVE GRADE PIPE &
APPURTANCES 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 09 CHEMICAL METERING PUMP SKID 187,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 187,400.00 0.00

09.01 DELIVER CHEMICAL METERING PUMP
SKID 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00

09.02 INSTALL CHEMICAL METERING PUMP
SKID 57,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,000.00 0.00

09.03 PROVIDE CHEMICAL
PIPING/APPURTENANCES 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00

09.04 INSTALL CHEMICAL
PIPING/APPURTENANCES 36,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,000.00 0.00

09.05 PROVIDE STATIC MIXER 7,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,400.00 0.00

09.06 INSTALL STATIC MIXER 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00

09.07 STARTUP&TEST CHEMICAL METERING
PUMP SKID 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 10 WELDED STEEL PUMP HOUSE 211,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 211,000.00 0.00

10.01 APPR SUBMITTAL WELDED STEEL
PUMP HOUSE 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 0.00

10.02 DELIVER WELDED STEEL PUMP HOUSE 80,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 0.00

10.03 INSTALL WELDED STEEL PUMP HOUSE 102,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 102,000.00 0.00

10.04 DELIVER BUILDING LIGHTING 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 0.00

10.05 INSTALL BUILDING LIGHTING 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 11 ELECTRICAL
EQUIPMENT/INSTRUMENTATION 154,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 154,000.00 0.00

11.01 APPROVED ELECTRICAL SUBMITTALS 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00

11.02 SCE COORD./SCE SERVICE UPGRADE
WELL 16 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00

11.03 DELIVER INSTRUMENTATION 26,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,000.00 0.00

11.04 INSTALL INSTRUMENTATION AT WELL
15 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00

11.05 INSTALL INSTRUMENTATION AT WELL
16 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00

19.A.

Activity ID Activity %
Complete
Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish Predecessors Successors Total
Float
Design Build Design Build Well 15 & Design Build Well 15 & 16 Treatment Plant W 265 21-Oct-24 08:00 A 18-Aug-27 17:00 0 Preliminary P Preliminary Phase 0 21-Oct-24 08:00 A 12-Mar-25 17:0 PREL001 100% Bid Date 0 21-Oct-24 08:00 A PREL002PREL002 100% Review and Evaluate Bids 0 21-Oct-24 08:00 A 30-Oct-24 17:0 PREL001 PREL003PREL003 100% RFP Reviewed by Committee 0 31-Oct-24 08:00 A 06-Nov-24 17:0 PREL002 PREL004PREL004 100% Top Firms Interview w/ City Staff 0 07-Nov-24 08:00 A 14-Nov-24 17:0 PREL003 PREL005PREL005 100% Firm Selection 0 15-Nov-24 08:00 A 21-Nov-24 17:0 PREL004 PREL006PREL006 100% Contract Negotiations 0 22-Nov-24 08:00 A 27-Nov-24 17:0 PREL005 PREL007PREL007 100% Draft Contracts Submitted to City 0 02-Dec-24 08:00 A 10-Dec-24 17:0 PREL006 PREL008PREL008 100% Notice of Award 0 11-Dec-24 08:00 A 11-Dec-24 17:0 PREL007 PREL009PREL009 100% Contract Approved by City Council 0 12-Dec-24 08:00 A 13-Jan-25 16:0 PREL008 PRMG001PREL019 100% Notice to Proceed 0 12-Mar-25 08:00 A 12-Mar-25 17:0 PRMG001 A1000, A1030, Project Mana Project Management 0 30-Jan-25 08:00 A 03-Sep-26 08:0 52 PRMG001 100% Kickoff Meeting/Anticipated Start of Design 0 30-Jan-25 08:00 A PREL009 PMDN001, PREPRMG002 100% Preliminary Design Review Meeting & Coordina 0 21-May-25 08:00 PMDN005 PMDN006, A10PRMG003 100% City Design Presentation 0 24-Jun-25 08:00 A PMDN006, PM FLDN-1010PRMG004 100% 60% Design Review Meeting 0 13-Nov-25 08:00 A FLDN-1010 FLDN-1020PRMG005 100% 90% Design Review Meeting 0 08-Jan-26 08:00 A FLDN-1040 FLDN-1050PRMG006 0% Issue for Construction (IFC) Submittal Review M 0 03-Sep-26 08:00 FLDN-1060 FLDN-1080 52 Prelim Design 0 30-Jan-25 08:00 A 15-Dec-25 16:0
PMDN001 100% Baseline and Utility Research (easement, elec 0 30-Jan-25 08:00 A 20-Feb-25 17:0 PRMG001 PMDN002PMDN002 100% Pull Existing Well Samples 0 21-Feb-25 08:00 A 21-Feb-25 17:0 PMDN001 PMDN003PMDN003 100% Receive Well Sample Results 0 24-Feb-25 08:00 A 03-Apr-25 17:0 PMDN002 PMDN004PMDN004 100% Prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR) 0 24-Feb-25 08:00 A 13-May-25 17:0 PMDN003 PMDN005PMDN005 100% Economic Evaluation and Alternative Analysis 0 05-Mar-25 08:00 A 20-May-25 17:0 PMDN004 PRMG002PMDN006 100% City Review draft PDR 0 21-May-25 08:00 04-Jun-25 17:0 PRMG002 PRMG003, PMPMDN007 100% Prepare Final PDR 0 06-Jun-25 08:00 A 12-Jun-25 17:0 PMDN006 PMDN008PMDN008 100% City Review Final PDR 0 13-Jun-25 08:00 A 17-Jun-25 17:0 PMDN007 PRMG003PMDN009 100% Geotechnical Investigation 0 09-Jun-25 08:00 A 21-Jul-25 16:00 CONS-1000 PMDN010PMDN010 100% Geotechnical Report 0 22-Jul-25 08:00 A 04-Aug-25 16:0 PMDN009 FLDN-1030, PMPMDN011 100% Survey 0 15-Dec-25 08:00 A 15-Dec-25 16:0 PMDN010 PMDN012PMDN012 100% Potholing 0 12-Dec-25 08:00 A 15-Dec-25 16:0 PMDN011 CONS-1060 Permit Applic Permit Application an Permit Application and Coordination a d 180 13-Nov-25 08:00 A 19-Apr-27 16:00 85 PAPP001 58.33% Early DDW Duration During Design 50 13-Nov-25 08:00 A 08-Oct-26 17:00 FLDN-1010 PAPP002 170PAPP002 0% DDW Coordination During Construction 45 16-Feb-27 08:00 19-Apr-27 16:00 CONS-1160, PA CONS-1370 85PAPP003 0% Permit Application (Construction Permit, Plann 40 02-Oct-26 08:00 01-Dec-26 17:0 FLDN-1070 CONS-1370 180 Final Design 50 08-Apr-25 08:00 A 08-Oct-26 17:00 27
FLDN-1000 100% 60% Design Package 0 08-Apr-25 08:00 A 24-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019 FLDN-1010, A1FLDN-1010 100% City Review 60% Design Package 0 08-Sep-25 08:00 A 12-Nov-25 17:0 FLDN-1000, PR PAPP001, PRMFLDN-1020 100% 60% Matrix Response 0 13-Nov-25 08:00 A 19-Nov-25 17:0 PRMG004 FLDN-1030, FLFLDN-1030 100% 90% Design Package 0 08-Dec-25 08:00 A 19-Dec-25 17:0 FLDN-1020, PM FLDN-1040, A1FLDN-1040 100% City Review 90% Design Package 0 22-Dec-25 08:00 A 02-Feb-26 17:0 FLDN-1030 PRMG005FLDN-1050 100% 90% Matrix Response 0 26-Feb-26 08:00 A 09-Mar-26 17:0 PRMG005 FLDN-1060FLDN-1060 0% Issue for Construction Design Package 15 03-Sep-26 08:00 24-Sep-26 17:0 FLDN-1050, FL FLDN-1070, PR 0FLDN-1070 0% City Review IFC Package 5 25-Sep-26 08:00 01-Oct-26 17:00 FLDN-1060 FLDN-1080, PA 27FLDN-1080 0% IFC Matrix Response 5 02-Oct-26 08:00 08-Oct-26 17:00 FLDN-1070, PR CONS-1060 27FLDN-1090 100% City Request of Cartridge Filters, VFD, Well pu 0 20-Nov-25 08:00 A 05-Dec-25 17:0 FLDN-1020 FLDN-1030, A1FLDN-1100 100% Submit COR for Cartridge 0 20-Jan-26 08:00 A 16-Apr-26 17:0 FLDN-1090 FLDN-1110

M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M 2025 2026 2027 2028
18-Aug-27 17:00, Design Build W
12-Mar-25 17:00 A, Preliminary Phase
Evaluate Bids
ed by Committeenterview w/ City Staff
ction
Negotiations
ntracts Submitted to City
of Award
tract Approved by City Council
Notice to Proceed
03-Sep-26 08:00, Project Management
ckoff Meeting/Anticipated Start of Design
Preliminary Design Review Meeting & Coordination
City Design Presentation
60% Design Review Meeting
90% Design Review Meeting
Issue for Construction (IFC) Submittal Review Meeting
15-Dec-25 16:00 A, Prelim Design
Baseline and Utility Research (easement, elec., sewer, etc.) Pull Existing Well Samples
Receive Well Sample Results
Prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
Economic Evaluation and Alternative Analysis
City Review draft PDR
Prepare Final PDR
City Review Final PDR
Geotechnical Investigation
Geotechnical Report
SurveyPotholing
19-Apr-27 16:00, Permit Application and Coord
Early DDW Duration During Design
DDW Coordination During Construction
Permit Application (Construction Permit, Planning Dept.) 08-Oct-26 17:00, Final Design
60% Design Package
City Review 60% Design Package
60% Matrix Response
90% Design Package
City Review 90% Design Package
90% Matrix Response
Issue for Construction Design Package
City Review IFC Package
IFC Matrix Response
City Request of Cartridge Filters, VFD, Well pump to design Submit COR for Cartridge
30-Jul-26 14:50
Actual WorkRemaining Work
Critical Remaining WorkMilestone
Summary Page 1 of 4 PROGRESS SCHEDULE

19.A.

Activity ID Activity %
Complete
Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish Predecessors Successors Total
Float
FLDN-1110 0% Execute CO for Cartridge Filters 1 25-Sep-26 08:00 25-Sep-26 17:0 FLDN-1060, FL A1690 36FLDN-1120 100% Submit COR for Well Pumps 0 31-Mar-26 08:00 A 11-May-26 16:0 FLDN-1090 FLDN-1130, FLFLDN-1130 66.67% City Discussion/Revisions and Approves CO fo 30 12-May-26 08:00 10-Sep-26 17:0 FLDN-1120 A1600, FLDN-1 0FLDN-1140 0% Execute Subcontract for Pumps 10 11-Sep-26 08:00 24-Sep-26 17:0 FLDN-1130 A1600 0FLDN-1150 0% Electrical Design Recommendation For New P 5 30-Jul-26 08:00 05-Aug-26 17:0 FLDN-1120 FLDN-1160 0FLDN-1160 0% Confirm Electrical Design With City 20 06-Aug-26 08:00 02-Sep-26 17:0 FLDN-1150 FLDN-1170, FL 0FLDN-1170 0% Submit Change Order for Electrical Design Cha 10 03-Sep-26 08:00 17-Sep-26 17:0 FLDN-1160 FLDN-1180 21FLDN-1180 0% City Approved CO for Electrical Design Change 10 18-Sep-26 08:00 01-Oct-26 17:00 FLDN-1170 A1660 21 Submittal Ph Submittal Phase 195 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 10-May-27 16:0 55 A1000 100% GAC Vessels 0 30-May-25 08:00 16-Jun-25 16:0 PREL019, PRM A1010A1010 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 17-Jun-25 08:00 A 26-Jun-25 17:0 A1000 A1020A1020 100% GAC Vessels Lead Time 0 27-Jun-25 08:00 A 16-Feb-26 17:0 A1010 CONS-1040A1030 100% General Electrical Materials Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 07-Jan-26 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1040A1040 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 31-Mar-26 08:00 A 13-Apr-26 16:0 A1030 A1050A1050 100% General Electrical Materials Lead Time 0 14-Apr-26 08:00 A 11-May-26 16:0 A1040 CONS-1130A1060 100% Flow Meter Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 26-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1070A1070 0% Engineers Review And Approval 10 30-Jul-26 08:00 12-Aug-26 17:0 A1060 A1080 66A1080 0% Flow Meter Lead Time 40 13-Aug-26 08:00 08-Oct-26 17:00 A1070 CONS-1050, C 66A1090 100% Electrical Equipment Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 26-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1100A1100 0% Engineers Review And Approval 10 30-Jul-26 08:00 12-Aug-26 17:0 A1090 A1110 66A1110 0% Electrical Equipment Lead Time 40 13-Aug-26 08:00 08-Oct-26 17:00 A1100 CONS-1050, C 66A1120 100% Lighting Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 26-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1130A1130 0% Engineers Review And Approval 10 30-Jul-26 08:00 12-Aug-26 17:0 A1120 A1140 167A1140 0% Lighting Lead Time 30 13-Aug-26 08:00 24-Sep-26 17:0 A1130 CONS-1290 167A1150 100% Reinforcing Steel Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 03-Jul-25 17:00 PREL019, FLD A1160A1160 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 09-Feb-26 08:00 A 22-Apr-26 08:0 A1150 A1170A1170 0% Reinforcing Steel Lead Times 10 30-Jul-26 08:00 12-Aug-26 17:0 A1160 CONS-1140 108A1180 100% CMU Submittal 0 22-Dec-25 08:00 A 22-Apr-26 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1190A1190 0% Engineers Review And Approval 10 30-Jul-26 08:00 12-Aug-26 17:0 A1180 A1200 215A1200 0% CMU Lead Time 20 13-Aug-26 08:00 10-Sep-26 17:0 A1190 CONS-1100 215A1210 100% Concrete Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 19-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019 A1220A1220 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 23-Jul-25 08:00 A 25-Jul-25 17:00 A1210 A1230A1230 100% Concrete Lead Time 0 28-Jul-25 08:00 A 08-Aug-25 17:0 A1220 CONS-1140A1240 100% Steel Pipe Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 26-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1250A1250 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 31-Oct-25 08:00 A 19-Nov-25 17:0 A1240 A1260A1260 65% Steel Pipe Lead Time 14 20-Nov-25 08:00 A 18-Aug-26 17:0 A1250 CONS-1080 79A1270 100% Ductile Iron Spools Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 19-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019 A1280A1280 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 04-Aug-25 08:00 A 15-Aug-25 17:0 A1270 A1290A1290 100% Ductile Iron Spools Lead Time 0 18-Aug-25 08:00 A 13-Oct-25 16:0 A1280 CONS-1170A1300 100% Ductile Iron Fittings Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 19-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019 A1310A1310 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 04-Aug-25 08:00 A 15-Aug-25 17:0 A1300 A1320A1320 100% Ductile Iron Fittings Lead Time 0 18-Aug-25 08:00 A 29-Sep-25 16:0 A1310 CONS-1170A1330 100% Butterfly Valves Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 19-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1340A1340 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 20-Jun-25 08:00 A 03-Jul-25 17:00 A1330 A1350A1350 100% Butterfly Valves Lead Time 0 07-Jul-25 08:00 A 29-Aug-25 17:0 A1340 CONS-1160A1360 100% Grooved Coupling Submittals 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 19-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1370A1370 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 20-Jun-25 08:00 A 03-Jul-25 17:00 A1360 A1380A1380 100% Grooved Coupling Lead Time 0 07-Jul-25 08:00 A 15-Aug-25 17:0 A1370 CONS-1170A1390 100% BMP Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 19-Jun-25 17:0 PREL019, FLD A1400

M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M 2025 2026 2027 2028
Execute CO for Cartridge Filters
Submit COR for Well Pumps
City Discussion/Revisions and Approves CO for Well Pump Execute Subcontract for Pumps
Electrical Design Recommendation For New Pumps
Confirm Electrical Design With City
Submit Change Order for Electrical Design Changes
City Approved CO for Electrical Design Changes
10-May-27 16:00, Submittal Phase
GAC Vessels
Engineers Review And Approval
GAC Vessels Lead Time
General Electrical Materials Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
General Electrical Materials Lead Time
Flow Meter Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Flow Meter Lead Time
Electrical Equipment Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Electrical Equipment Lead Time
Lighting Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Lighting Lead Time
Reinforcing Steel Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Reinforcing Steel Lead Times
CMU Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
CMU Lead Time
Concrete Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Concrete Lead Time
Steel Pipe Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Steel Pipe Lead Time
Ductile Iron Spools Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Ductile Iron Spools Lead Time
Ductile Iron Fittings Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Ductile Iron Fittings Lead Time
Butterfly Valves Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Butterfly Valves Lead Time
Grooved Coupling Submittals
Engineers Review And Approval
Grooved Coupling Lead Time
BMP Submittal
30-Jul-26 14:50
Actual WorkRemaining Work
Critical Remaining WorkMilestone
Summary Page 2 of 4 PROGRESS SCHEDULE

19.A.

Activity ID Activity %
Complete
Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish Predecessors Successors Total
Float
A1400 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 20-Jun-25 08:00 A 03-Jul-25 17:00 A1390 A1410A1410 0% BMP Lead Time 5 30-Jul-26 08:00 05-Aug-26 17:0 A1400 CONS-1070 80A1420 100% Metal Well House Structure Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 30-Jul-26 08:00 PREL019, FLD A1430 204A1430 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 20-Jun-25 08:00 A 30-Jul-26 08:00 A1420 A1440 204A1440 0% Metal Well House Structure Lead Time 0 30-Jul-26 08:00 30-Jul-26 08:00 A1430 CONS-1240, C 204A1450 100% Miscellaneous Steel Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 03-Jul-25 17:00 PREL019, FLD A1460A1460 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 31-Mar-26 08:00 A 30-Jul-26 08:00 A1450 A1470 174A1470 0% Miscellaneous Steel Lead Time 30 30-Jul-26 08:00 10-Sep-26 17:0 A1460 CONS-1240, C 174A1540 100% Chemical Piping & Appurtenances Submittal 0 13-Mar-25 08:00 A 03-Jul-25 17:00 PREL019, FLD A1550A1550 100% Engineers Review And Approval 0 28-Dec-25 08:00 A 30-Jul-26 08:00 A1540 A1560 142A1560 0% Chemical Piping & Appurtenances 20 30-Jul-26 08:00 26-Aug-26 17:0 A1550 CONS-1200 142A1570 100% Swing Check Valve Submittalty 0 08-Sep-25 08:00 A 15-Dec-25 16:0 PREL019, FLD A1580A1580 100% Engneers Reviews & Approval 0 16-Dec-25 08:00 A 01-Apr-26 17:0 A1570 A1590A1590 100% Swing Check Valve Lead Time 0 02-Apr-26 08:00 A 29-Apr-26 17:0 A1580 CONS-1390A1600 0% Well Pump Submittal 60 25-Sep-26 08:00 22-Dec-26 17:0 FLDN-1060, FL A1610 0A1610 0% Engineers Review & Approval 15 23-Dec-26 08:00 14-Jan-27 17:0 A1600 A1620 0A1620 0% Well Pump Lead Time 80 15-Jan-27 08:00 10-May-27 16:0 A1610 CONS-1405, C 0A1630 0% MCC Submittal 40 03-Sep-26 08:00 29-Oct-26 17:00 FLDN-1030, FL A1640 21A1640 0% Engineers Review & Approval 10 30-Oct-26 08:00 13-Nov-26 17:0 A1630 A1650 21A1650 0% MCC Lead Time 100 16-Nov-26 08:00 12-Apr-27 16:00 A1640 CONS-1380 21A1660 0% VFD Submittal 20 02-Oct-26 08:00 29-Oct-26 17:00 FLDN-1090, FL A1670 21A1670 0% Engineers Review & Approval 10 30-Oct-26 08:00 13-Nov-26 17:0 A1660 A1680 21A1680 0% VFD Lead Time 100 16-Nov-26 08:00 12-Apr-27 16:00 A1670 CONS-1380 21A1690 0% Cartridge Filter Submittal 35 28-Sep-26 08:00 16-Nov-26 16:0 FLDN-1110 A1700 36A1700 0% Engineers Review & Approval 10 17-Nov-26 08:00 02-Dec-26 17:0 A1690 A1710 36A1710 0% Cartridge Filter Lead Time 50 03-Dec-26 08:00 16-Feb-27 17:0 A1700 CONS-1430 36 On-Site Cons On-Site Construction t 215 30-May-25 08:00 18-Aug-27 17:0 0 CONS-1000 100% Pull & Assess Well 15 Pump 0 30-May-25 08:00 03-Jun-25 17:0 PMDN006 CONS-1020, CCONS-1010 100% Well 15 Pump Video & Recommendations 0 04-Jun-25 08:00 A 17-Jun-25 17:0 CONS-1000 CONS-1370CONS-1020 100% Pull & Assess Well 16 Pump 0 04-Jun-25 08:00 A 06-Jun-25 17:0 CONS-1000 CONS-1320, CCONS-1030 100% Well 16 Pump Video & Recommendations 0 09-Jun-25 08:00 A 20-Jun-25 17:0 CONS-1020 CONS-1060CONS-1040 100% Procurement (GAC System, Misc Mech., Etc.) 0 30-Jul-25 08:00 A 17-Apr-26 17:0 A1020 CONS-1150CONS-1050 0% Procurement (Electrical Equip - i.e. Flowmeters 1 09-Oct-26 08:00 09-Oct-26 17:00 A1080, A1110 CONS-1120 66CONS-1060 0% Mobilize 3 09-Oct-26 08:00 13-Oct-26 17:00 FLDN-1080, CO CONS-1070, C 27CONS-1070 0% Layout and Rough Grade 8 21-Oct-26 08:00 30-Oct-26 17:00 CONS-1060, A CONS-1080 27CONS-1080 0% Yard Piping 20 02-Nov-26 08:00 02-Dec-26 17:0 CONS-1070, A CONS-1320, C 27CONS-1090 0% Excavate & Set CMU Footings 5 31-Dec-26 08:00 07-Jan-27 17:0 CONS-1080, C CONS-1100 135CONS-1100 0% Install CMU & Gate 10 08-Jan-27 08:00 22-Jan-27 17:0 CONS-1090, A CONS-1360 135CONS-1110 0% Overex/Recompact GAC Filter Pad 5 03-Dec-26 08:00 09-Dec-26 17:0 CONS-1080 CONS-1140 27CONS-1120 0% Electrician To Mobilize On Site 1 03-Dec-26 08:00 03-Dec-26 17:0 CONS-1050, C CONS-1320, C 31CONS-1130 0% Install Site U/G Conduits 10 04-Dec-26 08:00 17-Dec-26 17:0 CONS-1120, A CONS-1140 31CONS-1140 0% Form/Pour/Strip GAC Pad 10 10-Dec-26 08:00 23-Dec-26 17:0 CONS-1130, A CONS-1150, CO 27CONS-1150 0% Set GAC Vessels 4 24-Dec-26 08:00 30-Dec-26 17:0 CONS-1040, C CONS-1160, CO 27CONS-1160 0% Set Piping/Mechs on GAC Pad 30 31-Dec-26 08:00 12-Feb-27 17:0 CONS-1150, A CONS-1330, PA 27CONS-1170 0% Well 15 & 16 Pipe Connection 5 26-Apr-27 08:00 30-Apr-27 17:00 CONS-1060, A CONS-1360 66CONS-1200 0% Install Chemical Piping & Appurtanences 7 16-Feb-27 08:00 24-Feb-27 17:0 A1560, CONS- CONS-1210 27CONS-1210 0% Install Above Grade Piping/Valves/Mechs at W 8 25-Feb-27 08:00 08-Mar-27 16:0 CONS-1200 CONS-1220, C 27CONS-1220 0% Install A/G Conduits & Unistrut 15 09-Mar-27 08:00 29-Mar-27 16:0 CONS-1160, CO CONS-1230, C 27CONS-1230 0% Install Electrical Equipment/Instrumentation 7 30-Mar-27 08:00 07-Apr-27 17:00 CONS-1220, A CONS-1240, C 27

M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M 2025 2026 2027 2028
Engineers Review And Approval
BMP Lead Time
Metal Well House Structure SubmittalEngineers Review And ApprovalMetal Well House Structure Lead Time Miscellaneous Steel Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Miscellaneous Steel Lead Time
Chemical Piping & Appurtenances Submittal
Engineers Review And Approval
Chemical Piping & Appurtenances
Swing Check Valve Submittalty
Engneers Reviews & Approval
Swing Check Valve Lead Time
Well Pump Submittal
Engineers Review & Approval
Well Pump Lead Time
MCC Submittal
Engineers Review & Approval
MCC Lead Time
VFD Submittal
Engineers Review & Approval
VFD Lead Time
Cartridge Filter Submittal
Engineers Review & Approval
Cartridge Filter Lead Time
18-Aug-27 17:00, On-Site Const
Pull & Assess Well 15 Pump
Well 15 Pump Video & Recommendations
Pull & Assess Well 16 Pump
Well 16 Pump Video & Recommendations
Procurement (GAC System, Misc Mech., Etc.)
Procurement (Electrical Equip - i.e. Flowmeters)
Mobilize
Layout and Rough Grade
Yard Piping
Excavate & Set CMU Footings
Install CMU & Gate
Overex/Recompact GAC Filter Pad
Electrician To Mobilize On Site
Install Site U/G Conduits
Form/Pour/Strip GAC Pad
Set GAC Vessels
Set Piping/Mechs on GAC Pad
Well 15 & 16 Pipe Connection
Install Chemical Piping & Appurtanences
Install Above Grade Piping/Valves/Mechs at Well 15
Install A/G Conduits & Unistrut
Install Electrical Equipment/Instrumentation
30-Jul-26 14:50
Actual WorkRemaining Work
Critical Remaining WorkMilestone
Summary Page 3 of 4 PROGRESS SCHEDULE

19.A.

Activity ID Activity %
Complete
Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish Predecessors Successors Total
Float
CONS-1240 0% Install Metal Well 16 House Structure 3 08-Apr-27 08:00 12-Apr-27 16:00 A1440, A1470, CONS-1290, C 32CONS-1250 0% Paint Above Grade Piping/Mechs 5 13-Apr-27 08:00 19-Apr-27 16:00 CONS-1240 CONS-1260 50CONS-1260 0% Pressure Test Pipe 1 20-Apr-27 08:00 20-Apr-27 17:00 CONS-1250 CONS-1270 50CONS-1270 0% Chlorinate/Disinfect Pipe & Tank 3 21-Apr-27 08:00 23-Apr-27 17:00 CONS-1260 CONS-1280, C 50CONS-1280 0% Load Media Into GAC Vessels 3 26-Apr-27 08:00 28-Apr-27 17:00 CONS-1270 CONS-1330 50CONS-1290 0% Install Lighting And Fixtures 4 13-Apr-27 08:00 16-Apr-27 17:00 CONS-1240, A CONS-1320, C 32CONS-1300 0% Pull Wire/Terminate 15 19-May-27 08:00 09-Jun-27 17:0 CONS-1230, C CONS-1310 0CONS-1310 0% Loop Checks/Integration 11 10-Jun-27 08:00 24-Jun-27 17:0 CONS-1300 CONS-1320 0CONS-1320 0% SCADA Coordination & Prelim Internal Startup 10 25-Jun-27 08:00 09-Jul-27 17:00 CONS-1120, CO CONS-1330 0CONS-1330 0% Startup & Test System 10 12-Jul-27 08:00 23-Jul-27 17:00 CONS-1160, CO CONS-1360, C 0CONS-1340 0% 7-Day Run Test 5 26-Jul-27 08:00 30-Jul-27 17:00 CONS-1330 CONS-1350 0CONS-1350 0% Owner Class Training 3 02-Aug-27 08:00 04-Aug-27 17:0 CONS-1340 CONS-1360 0CONS-1360 0% Punch List, Clean Up and Demob 10 05-Aug-27 08:00 18-Aug-27 17:0 CONS-1330, C CONS-1370 0CONS-1370 0% Project Complete 0 18-Aug-27 17:0 CONS-1010, C 0CONS-1380 0% Install new Elec. at Well 16 5 13-Apr-27 08:00 19-Apr-27 16:00 CONS-1220, A CONS-1300 21CONS-1390 0% Well 16 New Vault Work 10 16-Feb-27 08:00 01-Mar-27 16:0 A1590, CONS- CONS-1391 39CONS-1391 0% Well 16 Pipe Work 20 02-Mar-27 08:00 29-Mar-27 16:0 CONS-1390 CONS-1240 39CONS-1401 0% WELL 15 REHAB WORK 60 06-Nov-26 08:00 05-Feb-27 17:0 FLDN-1130 CONS-1402 5CONS-1402 0% WELL 16 REHAB WORK 60 08-Feb-27 08:00 03-May-27 16:0 FLDN-1130, CO CONS-1405, C 5CONS-1405 0% Install Well 15 Pump 3 11-May-27 08:00 13-May-27 17:0 A1620, CONS- CONS-1300, C 0CONS-1420 0% Install Well 16 Pump 3 14-May-27 08:00 18-May-27 17:0 A1620, CONS- CONS-1300 0CONS-1430 0% Cartridge Filter Work (Ex, Form, Pour, set) 10 17-Feb-27 08:00 02-Mar-27 17:0 A1710, CONS- CONS-1450 36CONS-1440 0% Demo Work 5 14-Oct-26 08:00 20-Oct-26 17:00 CONS-1060 CONS-1070 27CONS-1450 0% Pipe Supports & Racks 10 09-Mar-27 08:00 22-Mar-27 16:0 CONS-1210, C CONS-1230 32

M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M 2025 2026 2027 2028
Install Metal Well 16 House Structure
Paint Above Grade Piping/MechsPressure Test Pipe
Chlorinate/Disinfect Pipe & Tank
Load Media Into GAC Vessels
Install Lighting And Fixtures
Pull Wire/Terminate
Loop Checks/Integration
SCADA Coordination & Prelim Interna
Startup & Test System
7-Day Run Test
Owner Class Training
Punch List, Clean Up and DemoProject Complete
Install new Elec. at Well 16
Well 16 New Vault Work
Well 16 Pipe Work
WELL 15 REHAB WORK
WELL 16 REHAB WORK
Install Well 15 Pump
Install Well 16 Pump
Cartridge Filter Work (Ex, Form, Pour, set)
Demo Work
Pipe Supports & Racks
30-Jul-26 14:50
Actual WorkRemaining Work
Critical Remaining WorkMilestone
Summary Page 4 of 4 PROGRESS SCHEDULE

19.A.

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Oct 13 2026
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Jilleen Ferris, Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer; ☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☒ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution Approving the 2025 Pavement Management Plan RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution (Attachment No. 1):

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-171 – A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2025 PAVEMENT EVALUATION REPORT AS THE CITY’S UPDATED PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The 2025 Pavement Management Plan provides an updated assessment of approximately 272 miles of City-maintained roadways. The assessment identifies an overall pavement condition index of 63, classified as Fair, representing an improvement from the City's 2022 assessment. However, the report also identifies significant remaining pavement rehabilitation needs and evaluates the potential impacts of various funding levels on future roadway conditions.

The Plan will serve as a resource for prioritizing future pavement maintenance and capital improvements based on roadway conditions, available funding, and other City priorities. Approval of the Plan does not authorize construction, establish a final list of streets for improvement, or appropriate additional funding.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

The City periodically surveys its streets to measure pavement conditions and update its maintenance priorities. The previous citywide assessment was completed in 2022. On July 8, 2025, the City Council approved an agreement with H2O Partners, Inc., working with subcontractor Roadway Asset Services, LLC (RAS), to conduct a new assessment and provide pavement management services.

19.B.

RAS collected pavement data between September and December 2025. The resulting 2025 Pavement Evaluation Report (Attachment No. 2) documents roadway conditions, identifies potential treatments, and models how different funding levels could affect the network’s future condition. These findings form the basis of the City’s updated Pavement Management Plan.

DISCUSSION:

Pavement management helps the City choose the appropriate treatment at the appropriate time.

Streets in better condition may benefit from preventive maintenance that extends pavement life, while streets with greater deterioration may require more extensive rehabilitation or reconstruction. Timely pavement maintenance can extend the useful life of a roadway and reduce the likelihood of more costly rehabilitation or reconstruction as pavement conditions deteriorate. The condition ratings and funding scenarios provide staff with a consistent basis for evaluating these needs.

The surveyed citywide Overall Pavement Condition Index (OCI) increased from 52 in 2022 to 63 in 2025. As illustrated in Attachment No. 3, the share of pavement categorized as poor or very poor decreased from 47.5% to 25.4%. These comparisons help the City track changes in roadway conditions over time; they do not, by themselves, establish that any single project or funding source caused the improvement.

The 2025 pavement survey established a baseline Overall Pavement Condition Index (OCI) of 63.

Following completion of the survey, the City incorporated roadway improvement projects that had been completed or were in progress into its OpenGov Asset Management software. These updates increased the modeled network OCI from 63 to 65. Accordingly, the consultant's pavement evaluation identifies an OCI of 63 based on the original field survey, while the financial modeling and future pavement condition projections utilize an updated OCI of 65 to account for these roadway improvements. This distinction reflects the incorporation of additional project information into the City's pavement management system rather than a discrepancy in the original survey results.

The Plan also evaluates treatment timing based on the anticipated "Need Year" for a roadway segment and the potential "Cost of Deferral" if treatment is delayed. This analysis helps staff identify opportunities to address pavement deficiencies before conditions deteriorate into more costly treatment categories and provides a basis for evaluating how available funding can be strategically allocated across the roadway network.

Staff will use the Plan as a planning tool and will consider its analysis alongside field observations, planned utility work, traffic needs, available funding, and opportunities to group nearby streets efficiently. The City currently allocates approximately $5 million annually for roadway maintenance and improvements, requiring staff to strategically prioritize available funding among competing pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction needs. The City also utilizes OpenGov Asset Management, formerly known as Cartegraph, to maintain pavement data and evaluate treatment and funding scenarios, allowing staff to update priorities as roadway conditions and available funding change. Specific paving projects and expenditures will be brought forward through the Capital Improvement Program, budget process, and applicable project approval procedures. RAS recommends repeating comprehensive pavement condition assessments every three to five years.

The consultant's five-year pavement funding scenarios incorporate an assumed annual construction cost inflation rate of 5% for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation activities. This assumption is intended for long-range planning purposes and does not represent a forecast or guarantee of actual future cost increases. Actual costs may vary based on market conditions, material and labor costs,

19.B.

project scope, and other factors. Accordingly, the funding scenarios should be considered planning estimates and will be subject to refinement as specific projects and funding recommendations are developed.

The Pavement Evaluation Report also includes financial modeling to evaluate the potential impacts of various funding levels on future pavement conditions. Based on the consultant's analysis, the City's current annual pavement funding level of approximately $5 million is projected to result in a gradual decline in the overall pavement condition index over the five-year planning period. The consultant estimates that approximately $12.7 million annually would be necessary to maintain a network condition index of approximately 65.

These estimates illustrate the City's ongoing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation needs and provide a basis for evaluating future funding priorities. The scenarios are intended for long-range planning purposes and do not establish funding commitments or require the City to achieve a particular pavement condition target. Future funding allocations will remain subject to available resources, competing City priorities, and City Council consideration through the annual budget and Capital Improvement Program processes.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Plan on October 6th 2026 and recommended approval and adoption by City Council.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

On July 8, 2025, the City Council approved an agreement with H2O Partners, Inc. for pavement management services and authorized the City Manager to execute the necessary documents.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

Objective 1: Enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight.

Objective 2: Explore and implement homelessness solutions for the City of Hemet.

Objective 3: Increase Public Safety visibility and response.

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.

Objective 4: Increase employee retention by training and creating a positive workplace.

Objective 5: Streamline fire prevention coordination efforts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of the Pavement Management Plan has no immediate fiscal impact and does not appropriate additional funds. The report’s funding scenarios are planning estimates, not proposed appropriations. Future pavement projects and related funding requests will be considered through separate budget and project actions.

19.B.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Do not approve the Plan.

2. Provide alternative direction to the Interim City Manager.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment No. 1 - Reso. No. 2026-171
Attachment No. 2 - 2025 Pavement Evaluation Report
Attachment No. 3 - Pavement Condition Comparison (2022 vs 2025)

19.B.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-171 1
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

CITY OF HEMET

HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-171

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2025

PAVEMENT EVALUATION REPORT AS THE CITY'S

UPDATED PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does hereby resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City of Hemet maintains a network of public roadways and conducts periodic pavement condition assessments to inform maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital planning; and
WHEREAS, the City completed a citywide pavement condition assessment in 2022; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, the City Council approved an agreement with H2O Partners, Inc., working with its subcontractor Roadway Asset Services, LLC, to update the City’s pavement condition data and provide pavement management services; and WHEREAS, Roadway Asset Services, LLC, prepared the 2025 Pavement Evaluation Report following an assessment of approximately 272 miles of City roadway; and
WHEREAS, the report provides pavement condition data, roadway maps, potential maintenance treatments, and funding scenarios to assist the City in planning future pavement work; and

19.B.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-171 2
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHEREAS, the report's funding scenarios, pavement condition projections, and treatment recommendations are based on modeling assumptions and are intended to inform future planning and budget considerations rather than establish binding City policies or funding commitments; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a presentation on the report and, on October 6th, 2026, recommended that the City Council approve the report as the City’s updated Pavement Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the report, the staff report, and any comments presented at its meeting; and
WHEREAS, approval of the report as a planning resource does not approve any individual construction project, establish a binding paving schedule, adopt specific pavement condition targets, or appropriate construction funding.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution.

SECTION 2. Approval of Pavement Management Plan. The City Council approves the 2025 Pavement Evaluation Report, attached to the accompanying staff report as Attachment No. 2 and incorporated herein by reference, as the City's updated Pavement Management Plan. Approval of the Plan does not constitute adoption of any specific funding scenario, pavement condition target, treatment recommendation, or project priority identified in the report.

19.B.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-171 3
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
SECTION 3. Use of the Plan. The City Council acknowledges the 2025 Pavement Evaluation Report as a planning resource to assist staff in evaluating future pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital improvement priorities. Staff may consider the Plan's condition data, treatment recommendations, and funding scenarios, together with field conditions, infrastructure coordination, available resources, operational considerations, and other City priorities, when developing future recommendations for City Council consideration.

SECTION 4. Separate Project and Funding Actions. This Resolution does not authorize construction, approve a final list of streets for treatment, or appropriate additional funds. Specific projects and expenditures remain subject to applicable City approval processes, including consideration through the annual budget, Capital Improvement Program, and other applicable project approval procedures.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 2026. ___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk

19.B.

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-171 4
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 13th day of October, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk

19.B.

Roadway Asset Services, LLC 6001 W Parmer Lane #370-1102 Austin, TX 78727 210-837-5249 2025 Pavement Evaluation Report
City of Hemet, CA
September, 2026

19.B.

1 Table of Contents
1 Executive Summary..............................................................................................................................4

1.1 Condition Results..........................................................................................................................5

1.2 Budget Scenarios...........................................................................................................................5 2 Commonly Used Acronyms..................................................................................................................7 3 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................8 4 Project Scope & Methodology ...........................................................................................................13

4.1 Pavement Condition Assessment ...............................................................................................13

4.2 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Calculation ..............................................................................16

4.3 International Roughness Index (IRI) Calculation and Analysis....................................................17 5 Description of Distress Analysis .........................................................................................................18 6 Results................................................................................................................................................22

6.1 Overall Condition Index (OCI) Results.........................................................................................23

6.2 International Roughness Index (IRI) Results...............................................................................26

6.3 Distress Breakdown by Severity..................................................................................................31 7 Sample – Sized Segmentation ............................................................................................................33

7.1 Overview of Sample Size Processing...........................................................................................33

7.2 Methodology of Sample Size Processing ....................................................................................33

7.3 Sample Size Processing Results...................................................................................................33 8 Pavement Maintenance/Preservation Funding .................................................................................37 9 Scenarios and Budget Estimates........................................................................................................38

9.1 Deterioration curves...................................................................................................................38

9.2 Treatment Activities and Cost.....................................................................................................39

9.3 Scenarios.....................................................................................................................................40

9.3.1 Do-Nothing.............................................................................................................. 40

9.3.2 Unlimited Funding (Fix All) and Distribution of Costs............................................. 40

9.3.3 Steady State Network OCI (SS OCI)......................................................................... 41

9.3.4 Sample Maintenance Budgets versus OCI Improvement....................................... 41 10 Summary ............................................................................................................................................44 11 Appendix I: Distress Definitions (Colorado State University).............................................................45 12 Appendix II: Automated Data Collection Equipment.........................................................................47

12.1 Roadway Asset Collection (RAC) Vehicle ....................................................................................47

12.2 Quality Control/Assurance..........................................................................................................48

12.3 LCMS-2 ........................................................................................................................................50

12.4 Profile..........................................................................................................................................50

19.B.

List of Figures
Figure 1.1 City of Hemet, CA OCI Distribution .............................................................................................5 Figure 3.1: Deterioration Curve Example......................................................................................................9 Figure 3.2: City of Hemet, CA Inspection Breakdown...................................................................................9 Figure 3.3: City of Hemet, CA Roadway Network (Collection Status).........................................................11 Figure 3.4: City of Hemet, CA Surface Type Distribution............................................................................12 Figure 4.1: City of Hemet, CA Network Coverage Map ..............................................................................15 Figure 4.2: Right-of-Way Image Example....................................................................................................16 Figure 5.1: RAS Pavement Analysis Tool Example ......................................................................................19 Figure 5.2: LCMS Post PCI Processing Image ..............................................................................................20 Figure 5.3: Example of Distress Overlay Images.........................................................................................21 Figure 6.1: City of Hemet, CA OCI Ranges by Miles....................................................................................23 Figure 6.2: City of Hemet, CA OCI Ranges by Area .....................................................................................24 Figure 6.3: City of Hemet, CA OCI Distribution Map...................................................................................25 Figure 6.4: City of Hemet, CA OCI Example Map ........................................................................................26 Figure 6.5: City of Hemet, CA IRI Category Ranges by Miles ......................................................................27 Figure 6.6: City of Hemet, CA IRI Category Ranges by Area........................................................................28 Figure 6.7: City of Hemet, CA IRI Distribution Map ....................................................................................29 Figure 6.8: City of Hemet, CA Normalized IRI Example Map ......................................................................30 Figure 6.9: City of Hemet, CA Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Percentage of Segments...........................31 Figure 7.1: City of Hemet, CA OCI Original Segmentation Example Map ..................................................35 Figure 7.2: City of Hemet, CA OCI Sample Segmentation Example Map...................................................36 Figure 9.1: City of Hemet, CA Example of a Deterioration Curve with no Maintenance – Super Segment - Asphalt ........................................................................................................................................................38 Figure 9.2: City of Hemet, CA OCI Trend.....................................................................................................41 Figure 9.3: City of Hemet, CA - Predicted 5-Year Pavement Condition Index Outlook ..............................42 Figure 9.4: City of Hemet, CA - Predicted 1-Year Pavement OCI Targets...................................................43 Figure 12.1: RAS RAC Vehicle......................................................................................................................48 Figure 12.2: 9-Point Calibration Site Example ............................................................................................49 Figure 12.3: LCMS Data Definition..............................................................................................................51 List of Tables
Table 1.1: City of Hemet, CA OCI Ranges by Percent....................................................................................4 Table 3.1: City of Hemet, CA Inspection Breakdown..................................................................................10 Table 6.1: City of Hemet, CA Condition Scale .............................................................................................22 Table 6.2: City of Hemet, CA All OCI Ranges by Percent.............................................................................23 Table 6.3: City of Hemet, CA IRI Ranges by Percent ...................................................................................27 Table 6.4: City of Hemet, CA Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Percentage of Segments............................32 Table 6.5: City of Hemet, CA Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Average Density .........................................32 Table 7.1: City of Hemet, CA Sample Segmentation OCI Ranges by Percent .............................................34

19.B.

Table 7.2: City of Hemet, CA Sample Segmentation OCI Variance.............................................................34 Table 9.1: City of Hemet, CA - Maintenance Suggestion by OCI Range (Arterial/Major - Asphalt Roads).39 Table 9.2: City of Hemet, CA - Maintenance Suggestion by OCI Range (Secondary/Div.

Secondary/Collector/Exp. Collector - Asphalt Roads).................................................................................39 Table 9.3: City of Hemet, CA - Maintenance Suggestion by OCI Range (Local - Asphalt Roads)................39 Table 9.4: City of Hemet, CA – Fix All Cost per Maintenance Treatment...................................................41 Table 9.5: City of Hemet, CA Predicted 5-Year Overall Condition Index Outlook ......................................42 Table 9.6: City of Hemet, CA Predicted 1-Year Overall Condition Index Outlook ......................................43

19.B.

4 | P a g e
1 Executive Summary
Roadway Asset Services, LLC (RAS) performed a pavement condition assessment for the City of Hemet, CA to provide an accurate assessment of pavement. The pavement data collection started on September 16, 2025 and was completed on December 10, 2025. This report provides the processes and procedures for pavement condition data collection and evaluation, assessment of the results, and maintenance recommendations for the City’s maintained roadway network.

The pavement condition assessment included an automated mobile data collection, a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) calculated using RAS’s pavement analysis tool - Technical Rating Intelligence Program (Road TRIPTM), the International Roughness Index (IRI), a Riding Comfort Index (RCI), an OCI (Overall Condition Index), and the delivery of an ESRI file geodatabase. The assessment and conditions rating were performed in general accordance with national standards, where applicable.

The network OCI was determined by calculating PCI in accordance with ASTM D6433, Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys.

Table 1.1: City of Hemet, CA OCI Ranges by Percent
Overall Condition
Index (OCI) Range
Condition
Description
Total Area
(Sq. Yd.)
Percent of
Total Area
(Sq. Yd.)
Total
Distance
(Miles)
Percent of
Network
(Area)
86 - 100 Good 1,413,878 23.7% 64.78 23.9%
71 - 85 Satisfactory 1,692,592 28.4% 79.02 29.1%
56 - 70 Fair 597,170 10.0% 28.35 10.4%
41 - 55 Poor 730,838 12.2% 32.74 12.1%
26-40 Very Poor 731,708 12.2% 32.58 12.0%
11-25 Serious 700,516 11.7% 29.23 10.7%
0-10 Failed 106,985 1.8% 4.87 1.8%
Total of Rated Segments 5,973,687 100.0% 271.57 100.0%

19.B.

5 | P a g e
Figure 1.1 City of Hemet, CA OCI Distribution

1.1 Condition Results
RAS’s pavement analysis tool, Technical Rating Intelligence Program (Road TRIPTM), was used to evaluate and classify the distresses, and calculate the PCI. The PCI is a numerical rating of the pavement condition based on the type, severity, and density of distresses observed on the pavement surface. The IRI value is normalized to provide a value between 0 and 100. An OCI can be used to combine PCI and IRI into one score by weighing each value, but in this case OCI can was calculated by only using PCI. At the time of this evaluation in 2025, the weighted arithmetic average OCI for all roads was 63. Following Table 1.1, the network is in a “Fair” condition. The surveyed OCI does not include completed work, adjusting network for private roads or roads not maintained by the City, or aging of the data. These steps occur during the budget analysis, which resulted in a current network OCI of a 63 as of August 25th, 2026.

1.2 Budget Scenarios
RAS performed several five-year maintenance and preservation program scenarios for the City of Hemet starting Fiscal Year 2027 and ending in 2031. The City of Hemet has a pavement

19.B.

6 | P a g e
maintenance budget of $5,000,000. RAS also ran a series of models to define how the City’s budget will impact network OCI. The scenarios include a Do-Nothing ($0) scenario, an unlimited funding scenario to treat all roads in their current condition, and a scenario to maintain the current network condition. These budgets were applied in the OpenGov Asset Management software, previously known as CartegraphTM, for the development of a financially optimized 5- year plan. The City also requested several 1- year OCI-based budgets that will be discussed in Section 9.3.

Optimization is a broad-based term that has many different definitions. For most pavement management systems, optimization is the ability to prioritize a multi-year rehabilitation plan using several different factors that are important to City of Hemet and based on sound engineering constraints. RAS infuses financial optimization by identifying two key components of a financial analysis:

Need Year – when a road/segment becomes critical, meaning it is getting closer to dropping into the next more expensive rehabilitation category.

Cost of Deferral – identifying the cost of deferral between a road/segment’s current rehabilitation category and its next category.

Understanding the “Cost of Segment Deferral” allows the analysis to maximize the City’s funds in the best manner possible.

Using information provided by the City, RAS pavement management experience, and industry standards, RAS assigned the OCI impact to each maintenance activity and is presented in Tables

9.1 to 9.3.

A 5% inflation rate per year was applied to the maintenance and rehabilitation activity costs in the 5-year models.

19.B.

7 | P a g e
2 Commonly Used Acronyms
AC Asphalt Concrete
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BR Brick
GPS Global Positioning System
IRI International Roughness Index
LCMS Laser Crack Measurement System
OCI Overall Condition Index
PCC Portland Cement Concrete
PCS POS Computer System
PCI Pavement Condition Index
POS Position and Orientation System
RAC Roadway Asset Collection vehicle
RAS Roadway Asset Services
Road TRIPTM Road Technical Rating Intelligence Program
ROW Right-of-way
UNS Unsurfaced

19.B.

8 | P a g e
3 Introduction
The two most common types of paved surfaces are Asphalt and Concrete, or a combination of both. An asphalt pavement surface begins to oxidize and deteriorate from the day it is constructed, while concrete pavements may have longer durability, they also began deteriorating after construction due to exposure to the elements. Many factors affect the deterioration rate, such as, but not limited to, the traffic loads, climatic conditions, age, material durability, subgrade support, damage caused by poor drainage, and construction materials and techniques. These factors cause the deterioration rate to be different for every pavement section. To manage a large pavement network, “family performance” curves are developed from available data to represent the expected performance and to help determine optimal times to apply preventive and rehabilitation treatments. To develop more accurate curves, periodic evaluations and assessment of the pavement condition must be performed to gain a realistic representation of condition versus age of the pavement network.

It is important to note that pavement deterioration is not a linear process. Initial deterioration occurs at a slow rate. After approximately 40% to 50% of a pavement’s service life, a pavement segment reaches an “inflection point’ after which pavement condition rapidly deteriorates.

Understanding the condition and age at which this rapid drop occurs is imperative in determining the optimal time for maintenance (Figure 3.1). Similarly, properly understanding pavement conditions allow for cost effective preventive maintenance versus reactive maintenance at a much higher cost.

Standard industry practice is to assess a pavement network every three to five years. More frequent assessments will likely not detect significant changes in condition in most pavement segments. More than five years between assessments will likely miss critical changes and will not provide adequate data to define a deterioration curve where preventive maintenance is best applied. RAS recommends assessments every three years for networks greater than 100 miles.

Local and residential streets can be delayed to every five years, because they are expected to deteriorate at a slower rate compared to arterial/collector streets. Local street deterioration is based on climatic conditions more than traffic loads. However, if funding is not separated by arterial/collector streets versus local streets, the assessments should be done in the same year to provide equivalent information for the decision process.

In this report, we describe the tools, processes and procedures used to collect and analyze pavement condition data as well as provide a summary of the results obtained from calculating each segment’s OCI.

19.B.

9 | P a g e
Figure 3.1: Deterioration Curve Example
Figure 3.2: City of Hemet, CA Inspection Breakdown

19.B.

10 | P a g e
Table 3.1: City of Hemet, CA Inspection Breakdown
Item Description Centerline
Miles
Percent of
Centerline Miles
1 Asphalt Segments with OCI 271.57 99.47%
2 Not Collected - Other 0.73 0.25%
3 Not Collected - Construction 0.30 0.12%
4 Not Collected - Does Not Exist 0.10 0.05%
5 Not Collected - Bridge 0.09 0.03%
6 Not Collected - Not Accessible 0.09 0.03%
7 Not Collected - GIS Error 0.08 0.03%
8 Not Collected - Gated 0.04 0.01%
9 Not Collected - Brick 0.03 0.01%
Total With OCI 271.57 99.47%
Total Without OCI 1.46 0.53%
Total 273.03 100.00%

19.B.

11 | P a g e
Figure 3.3: City of Hemet, CA Roadway Network (Collection Status)

19.B.

12 | P a g e
Figure 3.4: City of Hemet, CA Surface Type Distribution

19.B.

13 | P a g e
4 Project Scope & Methodology
The overall project scope of work contains eight tasks outlined below:

1. Verify City’s Street network and calculate widths,

2. Perform mobile image data collection,

3. Determine the Pavement Condition Index (PCI),

4. Determine International Roughness Index (IRI),

5. Determine Overall Condition Index (OCI),

6. Pavement Condition Data formatted for integration with OpenGov Asset Management,

7. Budget Analysis in OpenGov Asset Management (CartegraphTM) software,

8. Prepare pavement final report.

4.1 Pavement Condition Assessment
Roadway Asset Services, LLC (RAS) performed a pavement condition survey for City of Hemet, CA beginning September 16, 2025 and concluding on December 10, 2025 covering approximately 270 centerline miles of roadway. RAS used a Roadway Asset Collection (RAC) vehicle to collect street level ROW images and Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS-2) pavement images. The collected LCMS-2 pavement images were used to identify street segment pavement distresses and severities through analysis, while the 360-degree panoramic ROW images were used to confirm pavement distresses.

Roadway networks are usually divided into three pavement surface types: asphalt (AC), Portland cement concrete (PCC), and unsurfaced (UNS). Due to the nature and scope of the project, pavement imagery and data were collected on asphalt roads.

To determine the general distress characteristics of each roadway segment, RAS utilized a RAC vehicle, which combines multiple engineered technologies to collect real-time pavement data, ROW data, and images at posted speed limits. This eliminates the need to place pavement inspection technicians in the field near vehicle traffic. A detailed listing and description of the RAC equipment is included in Section 12.0 of this report.

Mobile image collection of the City’s roadway network was accomplished through coordination with the City’s GIS map provided for the survey areas, as displayed in Figure 4.1. Efforts associated with mobile image collection included review of client GIS street centerline file, route planning based on GIS street centerline, and coordination of existing construction projects along the City’s streets.

19.B.

14 | P a g e
This project applied the ASTM D6433-11 ‘Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys’ pavement condition analysis method on collected LCMS-2 images to determine the road segment and network PCI. The ASTM D6433-11 method covers the process of quantifying pavement conditions and identifies pavement distress types, distress extent measurements, and distress severity to determine the deduct values for each distress type. ASTM D6433-11 outlines the method of PCI value calculation, which includes determining the deduct values, correcting for number of distresses in each survey, and calculating the PCI value by subtracting the maximum deduct value from one hundred.

The ASTM D6433-11 procedure also outlines how the road network is divided into Sections and Sample Units; first identifying the branches of the pavement with different uses, then dividing each branch into sections based on pavement design, construction history, traffic, and condition.

RAS used the sections defined by the City in their provided GIS database files. These sections typically can then be divided into sample units that are approximately 2,500 square feet in size.

However, for this evaluation, RAS used the option to evaluate 100% of the lanes driven by the RAC vehicle. Instead of averaging the number of sample units inspected within each section, RAS provided one OCI score determined by measuring all the distresses within the driven lane to determine the OCI for each section.

19.B.

15 | P a g e
Figure 4.1: City of Hemet, CA Network Coverage Map
The RAS RAC vehicle collects pavement and ROW images concurrently, approximately every 25 feet along each street segment. All pavement rating is done automatically through RAS’s Road TRIPTM to ensure we accurately capture all the distresses and false positives are minimized using proper sensor settings and logic engineering definitions of each distress.

International Roughness Index (IRI) and longitudinal profiles were collected using an ICC inertial profiling system in accordance with ASTM E950, AASHTO Standard M328-14, AASHTO R43-13, and AASHTO Standard R56-14. For the network collection project, RAS collected IRI data and presented the results in the final database based on the following:
• Line lasers were used in each wheel path to increase repeatability of measurements and to reduce variability due to wheel path cracking and concrete tinning. • The ICC profiler routinely achieves 98%+ cross-correlations on certification sites, making it one of the most accurate devices available for IRI and profile measurement. • The operation and verification of the inertial profiling system shall be expertly conducted in accordance with AASHTO Standard R57-14.

19.B.

16 | P a g e
The RAC vehicle is configured with a Point Gray Ladybug 5+ 32MP 360-degree camera to provide a full panoramic image of the ROW, displayed in Figure 4.2. The images were captured at roughly 20-foot intervals and were post-processed using collected inertial and GPS data. This allows for more accurate asset extraction to be completed.

The measuring of pavement width can be accomplished utilizing the calibrated Ladybug imagery in conjunction with the LCMS-2 imagery and inertial GPS data. Using the 360-degree view of the ladybug, RAS can accurately and repeatably measure from edge of pavement to edge of pavement for each road segment. This provides a more accurate area calculation for better budgeting and forecasting. For cul-de-sac sections an average width measurement is taken for the straight portion and the bulb. RAS can also calculate the areas of each segment independently and get a true area of the cul-de-sac section. This is one of the topics that are discussed at the working session prior to data collection. The length of a road segment is determined from the GIS database provided by the City. RAS understands that the GIS is not always 100 % accurate. In these cases, after collection is complete, RAS can use the GPS trajectory of the van to determine the true beginning and ending of the road to get a more accurate length and therefore a more accurate area measurement.

Figure 4.2: Right-of-Way Image Example

4.2 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Calculation
A pavement distress inventory consists of identifying specific pavement surface distress types that are associated with degradation of a pavement surface due to traffic loads, environmental factors, lack of maintenance and other anthropogenic or natural occurrences. The distress type is then assigned a severity rating (low/medium/high), and the extents of the distress type and

19.B.

17 | P a g e
severity are recorded. For this project, the pavement distress types, causes and measurements were inventoried utilizing the ASTM D6433-11 method. The inspections covered 100% of the length of a section for the outside lane of travel.

Each street segment’s PCI was calculated utilizing Road TRIPTM. The calculation tool within Road TRIPTM is based on the ASTM D6433-11 method of calculating a street segment’s PCI value using the observed pavement distresses and severities in the inventory database and ASTM D6433-11 deduct curves for each distress type. ASTM D6433-11 is based on a 0 to 100 rating scale where 0 represents a failed roadway condition and 100 represents an excellent roadway condition.

4.3 International Roughness Index (IRI) Calculation and Analysis As part of this contract, IRI values were collected along the survey segments utilizing a high-speed three laser profiler. The IRI is a general measurement of the ride quality of a street section and was performed in accordance with AASHTO R 43-07 and ASTM E950. IRI indexes were obtained from measured longitudinal road profiles and were processed using a quarter-car model at 52.80- foot intervals (0.010/mi). RAS utilized a three-laser surface profiling system for evaluating the smoothness of the pavement. The profiler uses infrared lasers and precision accelerometers to obtain accurate and precise profile measurements. The values reported provided to the City are in units of inches per mile. It should be noted that IRI indexes can “spike”, resulting in erroneous data being reported along sections of roads where slow speeds (below 35mph) are involved.

Categorization of IRI indexes can vary from state to state and are typically determined by the agency (e.g., City, DOT, City, etc.). The values for IRI should range from 0 to 700 inches/mile. Any values above 700 inches/mile are flagged and changed to be equal to 700 in/mi as they are caused by several reasons mentioned above. The lower the IRI number, the smoother the ride and conversely, higher values indicate a rougher ride. The national standard in the United States for IRI thresholds for all road classifications range from 96 in/mi to 170 in/mi indicating “acceptable” road segments, and IRI less than 95 in/mi are considered to be “good” road segments.

19.B.

18 | P a g e
5 Description of Distress Analysis
Fully automated distress reduction methods are used to classify and rate the distress; therefore, acceptance checks are performed by viewing the pavement images. The data collection vehicle includes software programs that overlay the distress ratings directly on the pavement image to allow viewing of the image and ratings together. Checks of distress ratings are a manual process in which samples of data are visually inspected for accuracy of the ratings. Since distress rating checks are very time-consuming, we commonly begin sampling checks before data collection/rating is complete. Because of this overlap, there is an opportunity to promptly recollect or resurvey any sections with data that do not meet quality criteria. Everything captured in the survey vehicle is GPS-tagged and allows for real time QC to ensure nothing is missed during data collection.

RAS post-processes the pavement and Right-of-Way (ROW) imagery from the RAC vehicle for each day of image collection. A data collection session, which is referred to as a survey, begins when the RAC crew selects “Start” in the collection software on board the RAC vehicle and ends when they select “Stop.” In a single day, we will collect multiple survey sets. With a completed day of collection, RAS pavement engineers and GIS analysts use Pavemetrics® Road Inspect Software to generate all the source data used by Road TRIPTM. Every survey set is linked to a uniquely identified road segment, which is used as an identifier during the analysis of the sample area, then identification of the distress extent / severity, and ultimately the distress density for each road segment is added to the database.

Figure 5.1 shows a few of the different tool’s RAS utilizes within Road TRIPTM during the QC process. In the upper left corner, we can observe the segment ID, all the images linked to that segment, the rated distresses and exercise the option to manually add a patch area if the Road TRIPTM tool has not identified the patch. RAS utilizes Microsoft® Azure Computer Vision algorithm to identify patches. The algorithm has been specially tested and trained by RAS to produce accurate patch detection. The upper right corner displays the Ladybug images, which the user can toggle between forward, left, right, right-rear, or left-rear facing views. The lower left corner lists the distresses rated in the segment selected with the severity, quantity, density and how many points are deducted from the PCI based on the ASTM D6433-11 deduct curve values. The lower right corner displays the rutting measured by the Laser Profiler and visually displayed by the LCMS-2 3D data.

19.B.

19 | P a g e
Figure 5.1: RAS Pavement Analysis Tool Example
This method of pavement distress inventory provides a quantifiable and repeatable process to the City. Each street segment, in conjunction with the pavement and ROW imagery, allows pavement engineers to review each road segment, allowing for an open quality control process that is defendable and repeatable.

Road TRIPTM uses the depth map created by the Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS) to locate the valleys and fissures within the surface of the roadway. These valleys and fissures are then measured and rated. Figures 5.2 and 5.3 display an example of distress overlay images.

19.B.

20 | P a g e
Figure 5.2: LCMS Post PCI Processing Image
The yellow line indicates the boundary of rated sample, green, yellow, and red dotted lines indicate longitudinal and transverse cracking (LT) of low, moderate, and high extent. The blue lines are sealed cracks detected by the LCMS and are attributed to the low severity linear crack category. The pink, magenta, and violet lines indicate areas of low, moderate, and high severity alligator cracking that has been filtered because it does not meet minimum length or width requirements. The measurements on the right side of the image are the length for longitudinal / transverse (LT) cracking in meters, the area in square meters for alligator cracking (Acrk) and the number of potholes (Pot) or count.

The LCMS has been set up to follow the ASTM D6433 to determine the severity of each distress.

Each distress is defined by ASTM D6433, and the severity levels are presented as measurable attributes of the distress. For example, longitudinal and transverse cracks are defined by the crack width; where non-filled cracks with a width less than 3/8 inch or filled cracks of any width are considered low severity. Moderate severity is defined as non-filled cracks with a width between 3/8 inch and 3 inches. High severity is defined as cracks greater than 3 inches in width or those surrounded by moderate to high severity cracks. The overlay images provide a visual means by which to review the sensor.

19.B.

21 | P a g e
Figure 5.3: Example of Distress Overlay Images

19.B.

22 | P a g e
6 Results
The overall pavement network health of the City of Hemet can be evaluated by examining Figure

6.1 in more detail. This figure illustrates the percentage of network miles that fall within each descriptive condition category. Key observations from this pavement survey include:
• Shape of Distribution – the graph illustrates a distribution that is shifted to the right and peaks between an OCI of 71 to 85. This pattern is indicative of a municipality with an active and effective pavement maintenance program, suggesting ongoing reinvestment through major rehabilitation efforts. • Average OCI – The City’s network average OCI score is 63 (as of December 2025) and is within the averages that are typically seen across the country between a 60 to 65.
• Good Roads – Currently 23.9% of the City’s roadways by pavement area fall into the Good OCI condition category, which is above the national average of 15%. • Backlog – Roads with an OCI below 40, classified as Very Poor, Serious, or Failed, represent approximately 25.3% of the roadway network by pavement area.

Backlogs above 12% are generally considered unmanageable and may require outside funding to reduce and prevent further growth.

Table 6.1: City of Hemet, CA Condition Scale
Condition Description
86 – 100 GOOD
71 – 85 SATISFACTORY
56 – 70 FAIR
41 – 55 POOR
26 – 40 VERY POOR
11 – 25 SERIOUS
0 – 10 FAILED

19.B.

23 | P a g e

6.1 Overall Condition Index (OCI) Results
The Overall Condition Index (OCI) is a measure of the overall serviceability provided by a pavement to the vehicle driver. In this case, the OCI was calculated using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value.

Table 6.2: City of Hemet, CA All OCI Ranges by Percent
Overall Condition
Index (OCI) Range
Condition
Description
Total Area
(Sq. Yd.)
Percent of
Total Area
(Sq. Yd.)
Total
Distance
(Miles)
Percent of
Network
(Miles)
86 - 100 Good 1,413,878 23.7% 64.78 23.9%
71 - 85 Satisfactory 1,692,592 28.4% 79.02 29.1%
56 - 70 Fair 597,170 10.0% 28.35 10.4%
41 - 55 Poor 730,838 12.2% 32.74 12.1%
26-40 Very Poor 731,708 12.2% 32.58 12.0%
11-25 Serious 700,516 11.7% 29.23 10.7%
0-10 Failed 106,985 1.8% 4.87 1.8%
Total of Rated Segments 5,973,687 100.0% 271.57 100.0%
Figure 6.1: City of Hemet, CA OCI Ranges by Miles

19.B.

24 | P a g e
Figure 6.2: City of Hemet, CA OCI Ranges by Area

19.B.

25 | P a g e
Figure 6.3 displays the Overall Condition Index distribution throughout the City’s survey area roads. Figure 6.4 displays an example zoomed-in OCI map with the actual OCI values for each roadway section.

Figure 6.3: City of Hemet, CA OCI Distribution Map

19.B.

26 | P a g e
Figure 6.4: City of Hemet, CA OCI Example Map

6.2 International Roughness Index (IRI) Results
As described in Section 4, the IRI value represents the roughness of the ride. The lower the IRI number, the smoother the ride and conversely, higher values indicate a rougher ride. However, several states are reviewing their strategic repair and rehabilitation programs based on IRI values for previously identified road sections using IRI. Tables 6.3 shows the overall IRI condition of the network based on surface types.

19.B.

27 | P a g e
Table 6.3: City of Hemet, CA IRI Ranges by Percent
International
Roughness Index (IRI)
Range
Condition
Description
IRI Value
(in/mile)
Total Area
(Sq. Yd.)
Total Distance
(Miles)
Percent of
Network (Miles)
86 - 100 Good 644,595 10.8% 27.86 10.3%
71 - 85 Satisfactory 3,036,514 50.8% 134.88 49.7%
56 - 70 Fair 1,579,837 26.4% 73.07 26.9%
41 - 55 Poor 447,906 7.5% 21.67 8.0%
26- 40 Very Poor 156,103 2.6% 8.34 3.1%
11-25 Serious 71,221 1.3% 3.78 1.4%
0-10 Failed 37,511 0.6% 1.97 0.6%
Total of Rated Segments 5,973,687 100.0% 271.57 100.0%
Figure 6.5: City of Hemet, CA IRI Category Ranges by Miles

19.B.

28 | P a g e
Figure 6.6: City of Hemet, CA IRI Category Ranges by Area

19.B.

29 | P a g e
Figure 6.7 displays the International Roughness Index distribution throughout the City’s survey area roads. Figure 6.8 displays an example zoomed-in IRI map with the actual IRI values for each roadway section.

Figure 6.7: City of Hemet, CA IRI Distribution Map

19.B.

30 | P a g e
Figure 6.8: City of Hemet, CA Normalized IRI Example Map

19.B.

31 | P a g e

6.3 Distress Breakdown by Severity
Figures 6.9 and Tables 6.4 and 6.5 display the types of distresses identified in Hemet’s asphalt streets. The figures and tables titled “…Breakdown by Percentage of Segments” show the percentage of segments that contain each distress type and severity level. Each distress is considered independently, meaning the percentages reflect the presence of a distress within a segment—not the area it covers. For example, if 65% low alligator cracking is reported, it indicates that 65% of the total street segments exhibit some amount of low-severity alligator cracking. Similarly, 34% high alligator cracking means that 34% of all segments contain at least some high-severity alligator cracking.

Tables and figures titled “…Breakdown by Average Density” represent the average density of each distress and severity level across all segments. For instance, a value of 5% low alligator cracking indicates that, on average, 5% of the pavement area in segments containing this distress is affected by low-severity alligator cracking. Therefore, while Table 6.4 shows that 65% of asphalt streets contain some level of low alligator cracking, Table 6.5 reveals that the average density is only 5%, suggesting this distress affects a relatively small portion of the overall network area.

It is also important to note that not all distresses contribute equally to the OCI calculation. For example, a single pothole can have a greater negative impact on OCI than 100% low-severity weathering. As such, the following tables and figures should be used primarily to understand the types and distribution of distresses present within the network, rather than as direct indicators of overall pavement condition.

Figure 6.9: City of Hemet, CA Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Percentage of Segments

19.B.

32 | P a g e
Table 6.4: City of Hemet, CA Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Percentage of Segments Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Severity
Distress/ Severity Low Moderate High
Alligator Cracking 64.68% 45.42% 34.18%
Block Cracking 48.71% 16.29% 0.26%
Long / Trans Cracking 99.25% 81.10% 30.69%
Patching 28.74% 2.77% 0.03%
Potholes 0.07% 0.03% 0.00%
Rutting 22.48% 7.33% 0.16%
Weathering 99.97% 40.57% 50.28%
Table 6.5: City of Hemet, CA Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Average Density Asphalt Distress Breakdown by Average Density
Distress / Severity Low Moderate High
Alligator Cracking 5.47% 1.81% 0.96%
Block Cracking 35.52% 11.69% 3.60%
Long / Trans Cracking 7.22% 1.48% 0.29%
Patching 2.10% 0.88% 0.60%
Potholes 0.02% 0.10% 0.00%
Rutting 2.60% 0.55% 0.52%
Weathering 99.80% 0.98% 0.52%

19.B.

33 | P a g e
7 Sample – Sized Segmentation

7.1 Overview of Sample Size Processing
In addition to processing the network based on the original segmentation provided by the City, RAS also analyzed the data using 2,500-square-foot sample areas. Depending on the characteristics of a network, some segments can be quite long, sometimes extending over a mile.

Segment-level OCI and IRI scores represent the average condition across the entire segment; therefore, the longer the segment, the more variation is averaged together. According to ASTM D6433, each distress type and severity level is associated with a specific deduct curve that depends on the density of that distress within a segment. For long segments, distress densities often appear smaller and may not accurately reflect localized problem areas.

To address this issue, RAS reprocessed the network using 2,500-square-foot samples. This approach provides a more detailed understanding of the types and locations of distresses present, allowing for identification of which direction, lane, or portion of a segment is most affected. The resulting information enables City officials to make more informed decisions regarding targeted maintenance treatments, such as patching or localized repairs.

7.2 Methodology of Sample Size Processing
After the initial data was collected and processed, RAS further refined the analysis by dividing the network into 2,500-square-foot samples. The data was reprocessed so that each segment represented, at most, a single pass or direction of a short segment, typically corresponding to a smaller portion of a lane. All data underwent Quality Control review in accordance with ASTM D6433. The processing and rating methodologies used for both the samples and the original segments are identical and are described in detail in Section 3 of this report.

7.3 Sample Size Processing Results
Overall, the short segmentation provides greater detail about the specific locations of problem areas and pavement distresses. As a result, many of the OCI category distributions changed when processed at this level. Table 7.1 summarizes the total number of samples within each OCI range following the 2,500-square-foot segmentation.

The results indicate that a larger portion of samples fall within the Good condition category compared to the original segmentation. Similarly, there is also an increase in the number of samples classified as Failed, which suggests the presence of isolated areas with significant issues throughout the network. By separating these localized problem areas from longer segments, the remaining portions of the network appear in noticeably better condition.

This analysis indicates that, overall, the pavement network is in good condition, with a few isolated areas of severe distress that disproportionately affect the average OCI in the original

19.B.

34 | P a g e
segmentation. Complete detailed results from the short-segmentation analysis can be accessed through the City’s database.

Table 7.1: City of Hemet, CA Sample Segmentation OCI Ranges by Percent Overall Condition
Index (OCI) Range Condition Description Percent of Sample Area 86 - 100 Good 26.2%
71 - 85 Satisfactory 26.1%
56 - 70 Fair 13.8%
41 - 55 Poor 10.9%
26-40 Very Poor 10.8%
11-25 Serious 9.2%
0-10 Failed 3.0%
Total of Rated Segments 100%
Following the sample-level OCI processing, each segment was assigned an OCI variance value.

The OCI variance represents the difference between the highest and lowest OCI scores within a single segment. Table 7.2 provides a statistical summary of the OCI variances for all segments in the network.

For example, the “Smallest” OCI variance shown in the table represents the lowest variance observed among all segments. A variance value of 0 indicates a completely uniform pavement condition across the segment. The “Average” value represents the mean OCI variance across all segments in the network—higher averages indicate greater variability in pavement condition within segments.

Table 7.2: City of Hemet, CA Sample Segmentation OCI Variance Sample OCI Variance Statistics
Smallest Variance 0
Largest Variance 91
Mean 22
Median 15
St. Deviation 22

19.B.

35 | P a g e
Figure 7.1 illustrates the OCI scores based on the original segmentation provided by the City, while Figure 7.2 displays the OCI scores for the same areas using the sample-level segmentation. By comparing these two maps, it can be observed that although the overall pavement conditions are generally acceptable, there are localized regions with significantly lower OCI values that negatively impact the overall segment scores.

Figure 7.1: City of Hemet, CA OCI Original Segmentation Example Map

19.B.

36 | P a g e
Figure 7.2: City of Hemet, CA OCI Sample Segmentation Example Map

19.B.

37 | P a g e
8 Pavement Maintenance/Preservation Funding
RAS conducted multiple five-year pavement maintenance and preservation program scenarios for the City’s evaluation based on the scores in the OpenGov Asset Management (Cartegraph®) software. So, unlike the previous charts and figures which only represented the year 1 collected segments, the following results are based on the network as a whole using aged condition data from the most recent inspection. Additionally, RAS assisted in the development and configuration of a Super Segment Asset, enabling the City to generate scenarios with more realistic maintenance projects for planning and bidding purposes.

The analysis runs a series of models to define how the City’s budget will impact network OCI. The scenarios include a Do-Nothing ($0) scenario, an unlimited funding scenario to treat all roads in their current condition, and a scenario to maintain the current network condition. During review of the analysis results, the RAS team also created another version of the City of Hemet budget where $4M was allocated to maintenance activities and $1M was reserved specifically for full reconstruction to address the City’s backlog, defined as segments who’s estimated OCI is below

35. The City also requested several single-year OCI-based scenarios. The results from these scenarios are then used to establish a funding level trend. This approach answers specific funding questions asked at the time of analysis and also provides a 5-year maintenance and rehabilitation plan.

19.B.

38 | P a g e
9 Scenarios and Budget Estimates

9.1 Deterioration curves
Deterioration curves or Predictions Groups as they are referred to in OpenGov’s Asset Management (CartegraphTM), were established for Asphalt pavement and follow similar degradation standards as outlined by ASTM D6433 and the US Army Corps of Engineers. In future pavement condition assessments, it is suggested that the consultant conducts a thorough comparison of the current inspection data against the previous condition assessment. Such an analysis will allow for further refinement of the pavement deterioration curves to ensure they reflect reasonable rates of degradation in City of Hemet, CA. Such an analysis should be conducted after every pavement condition update. The pavement prediction group was assembled to establish a 100 - 0 deterioration curve for Asphalt pavement. An example of this curve is presented in Figure 9.1.

Figure 9.1: City of Hemet, CA Example of a Deterioration Curve with no Maintenance – Super Segment - Asphalt This curve represents the deterioration of Asphalt roads and all functional classifications without maintenance.

Reviewing deterioration rates for unmaintained roads as part of each condition data collection cycle and adjusting deterioration curves is a recommended best practice.

19.B.

39 | P a g e

9.2 Treatment Activities and Cost
Tables 9.1 through 9.3 summarize the maintenance strategy for roads within an OCI range, the cost of the maintenance per square yard, and the assumed OCI impact for each type of maintenance.

Table 9.1: City of Hemet, CA - Maintenance Suggestion by OCI Range (Arterial/Major - Asphalt Roads) Treatment Min OCI
Max
OCI
Cost
per SY
Reset
Value
Do-Nothing 90 100 $0.00 +0
Crack Seal 85 90 $3.15 +5
Slurry Seal 70 85 $8.10 +12
Minor Mill & Overlay 55 70 $45.00 92
Major Mill & Overlay 35 55 $63.00 95
Full Reconstruction 0 35 $90.00 100
Table 9.2: City of Hemet, CA - Maintenance Suggestion by OCI Range (Secondary/Div. Secondary/Collector/Exp. Collector - Asphalt Roads)
Treatment Min OCI
Max
OCI
Cost
per SY
Reset
Value
Do-Nothing 90 100 $0.00 +0
Crack Seal 85 90 $2.25 +5
Slurry Seal 70 85 $7.50 +12
Minor Mill & Overlay 55 70 $40.00 92
Major Mill & Overlay 35 55 $60.00 95
Full Reconstruction 0 35 $85.00 100
Table 9.3: City of Hemet, CA - Maintenance Suggestion by OCI Range (Local - Asphalt Roads) Treatment Min OCI
Max
OCI
Cost
per SY
Reset
Value
Do-Nothing 90 100 $0.00 +0
Crack Seal 80 90 $1.80 +5
Slurry Seal 65 80 $6.50 +12
Minor Mill & Overlay 40 65 $37.00 92
Full Reconstruction 0 40 $71.00 100
Each maintenance strategy has a critical and non-critical OCI range. Streets that are not maintained when they are in the critical range will deteriorate into the next category of maintenance and will become more expensive the following year. The analysis prioritizes segments in the critical OCI range over segments that are in the non-critical OCI range. Given an unlimited budget, the analysis will select all segments in the critical OCI range followed by all segments in the non-critical OCI range.

19.B.

40 | P a g e
Each maintenance strategy has a Cost of Deferral Priority which prioritizes selections within the critical OCI range (within 2-4 points of dropping into the next rehabilitation activity) and within the non-critical OCI range. The priority is sequenced by prioritizing the segments that cost more to defer than segments that cost less to defer, starting with the critical segments first. For example, the cost of deferring a critical Slurry Seal at $8.10/sqyd to a Minor Mill & Overaly at $45.00/sqyd is $36.90/sqyd. The financially optimized model will prioritize the critical selections first and if there is funding left over, non-critical selections will then be selected and prioritized using the very same cost of deferral sequencing.

9.3 Scenarios
Multiple scenario analyses have been conducted to evaluate the relationship between funding levels and their impact on network OCI, providing valuable insights for strategic decisionmaking. All scenarios were initiated on August 25th, 2026, with a starting network OCI of 65, which was the same as the OCI when the network survey was completed in September of 2025 Table 9.5 presents the OCI trend by calendar year, along with maintenance funding, providing a comparative analysis across all scenarios.

9.3.1 Do-Nothing
The Do-Nothing budget models the impact of applying zero maintenance. While it is not a scenario that occurs in practice, the Do-Nothing budget provides an understanding of the rate at which the level of service of the street network will deteriorate without maintenance and ensures the modeling engine is properly applying deterioration over time. In Figure 9.3 the gray line represents the OCI trend if there is zero maintenance applied for the next 5 years. The network OCI would drop from 65 to 51.

9.3.2 Unlimited Funding (Fix All) and Distribution of Costs The Fix All analysis identifies the current maintenance deficiency of the network. Based on the Fix All analysis, the City’s needs a total budget of approximately $188M (About $173M coming in year 1) to treat all of their roads in their current condition. The City’s greatest maintenance need by funding is Reconstruction with 46.9% of the total cost, while representing 19.6% of the total area of the network. Table 9.4 demonstrates the importance of preservation work and highlights the large percentage of roads in need of Slurry Seal and Crack Seal.

19.B.

41 | P a g e
Table 9.4: City of Hemet, CA – Fix All Cost per Maintenance Treatment Pavement
Type
Treatment Cost ($) Cost (%) Area (ft^2) Area (%)
Asphalt Full Reconstruction $82,237,568 47.6% 9,309,590 19.6% Asphalt Major Mill & Overlay $43,127,027 25.0% 6,388,014 13.4% Asphalt Minor Mill & Overlay $36,090,572 20.9% 8,462,361 17.8% Asphalt Slurry Seal $8,509,117 4.9% 11,303,052 23.8%
Asphalt Crack Seal $2,766,391 1.6% 12,073,857 25.4%
Total $172,730,675 100% 47,536,874 100%

9.3.3 Steady State Network OCI (SS OCI)
The Network OCI is generally accepted as the street networks measure of level of service to the community. The purpose of the Steady State Network OCI analysis is to identify the budget needed to maintain the network OCI as it was surveyed in 2025 and provide a steady level of service to the community.

Approximately $12,736,000 per year is needed to maintain a Network OCI of 65.

Figure 9.2: City of Hemet, CA OCI Trend

9.3.4 Sample Maintenance Budgets versus OCI Improvement Additional sample maintenance budgets were run to define the relationship between budget levels and network OCI. The 5-year budget scenario is set to start in the Fiscal year 2027 and end in 2031.

19.B.

42 | P a g e
Figure 9.4 indicates that a budget of approximately $12,736,000 per year is needed to maintain a network OCI of 65 and maintain a consistent level of service to the community. Figure 9.4 can be used to answer and predict the network OCI at any funding level between $0 per year and `$38,000,000 per year. Figure 9.4 was used to predict the OCI at the following budgets in Table

9.5. Figure 9.3: City of Hemet, CA - Predicted 5-Year Pavement Condition Index Outlook Table 9.5: City of Hemet, CA Predicted 5-Year Overall Condition Index Outlook Budget Network OCI
$0 51
$5,000,000 57
~$13,000,000 65
$25,000,000 77
~$37,580,000 90
The City of Hemet asked the RAS team to develop three additional one-year scenarios with target OCI values of 65, 70, and 75. Figure 9.4 shows the estimated funding needed to reach each target OCI. The results from Figure 9.4 were then used to estimate the budget scenarios summarized in Table 9.6.

19.B.

43 | P a g e
Figure 9.4: City of Hemet, CA - Predicted 1-Year Pavement OCI Targets Table 9.6: City of Hemet, CA Predicted 1-Year Overall Condition Index Outlook Budget Network OCI
$16,718,724 65
$40,218,428 70
$69,535,790 75

19.B.

44 | P a g e
10 Summary
In conclusion, Hemet’s pavement is in Fair condition, with a network average OCI of 65. However, pavement management is a complex topic that involves many factors, including the types of distresses found across the network, the desired level of service, and the network’s size and age.

For this reason, it is important to consider results from multiple perspectives. In addition to OCI, backlog, any pavement asset with an Estimated OCI of less than 40, is a critical metric when assessing the overall condition of a pavement network. Backlog amounts can quickly become unmanageable for most agencies, so maintaining a healthy backlog is essential. Using the Hemet $5M budget the current backlog sits at 25%, which is very high for the network. RAS recommends repeating pavement condition surveys every 3-5 years to best analyze pavement conditions over time.

19.B.

45 | P a g e
11 Appendix I: Distress Definitions (Colorado State University) • AC Bleeding & Pumping (ft2) represents excessive use of bituminous binder in the asphalt mix.
• AC Fatigue (Alligator) Cracking (ft2) is associated with fatigue due to traffic loading and visually looks as interconnected cracks forming small pieces ranging in size from about 1” to 6” typically in the wheel path.
• AC Block Cracking (ft2) usually intersect at nearly right angles and range from one foot to 10’ or more across. The closer spacing indicates more advanced aging caused by shrinking and hardening of the asphalt over time.
• AC Edge Cracking (ft) is parallel to and usually within 1.5 feet of the outer edge of the pavement. This distress is accelerated by traffic loading and can be caused by frostweakened base or subgrade near the edge of the pavement. • AC/PCC Lane/Shoulder Drop-off (ft) is a difference in elevation between the pavement edge and the shoulder. This distress is caused by shoulder erosion, shoulder settlement, or by building up the roadway without adjusting the shoulder level. • AC Linear Cracking (trans/long) (ft) typically occurs in overlays where the crack is reflected through the overlaying asphalt surface.
• AC Patching (ft2) is an area of pavement that has been replaced with new material to repair existing pavement.
• AC Potholes (count) are small, usually less than 30 inches in diameter, bowl-shaped depressions in the pavement surface. Generally, have sharp edges and vertical sides near the top of the hole.
• AC Raveling & Weathering (ft2) is loss of pavement material from the asphalt surface.

Typically raveling is caused by stripping of the bituminous film from the aggregate or hardening of asphalt due to aging. Poor compaction, especially in cold weather construction, or insufficient asphalt content can also cause raveling. • AC Slippage Cracking (ft2) are crescent of half-moon shaped cracks, usually transverse to the direction of travel. They are produced when braking or turning wheels cause the pavement to slide or deform.
• AC Rutting (ft2) is a surface depression in the wheel paths. • PCC Corner Break (slab count) is a crack that intersects the joints. Load repetition combined with loss of support and curling stresses usually cause corner breaks. • PCC Divided Slab (slab count) is when a slab is divided into four or more pieces due to overloading, or inadequate support.

19.B.

46 | P a g e
• PCC Durability “D” Cracking (slab count) is caused by freeze-thaw expansion of the large aggregate, which gradually breaks down the concrete. Usually appears as a pattern of cracks running parallel and close to a joint or linear crack. • PCC Joint Sealant Damage (slab count) is any condition that enables soil or rocks to accumulate in the joints or allows significant water infiltration. • PCC Linear Cracking (trans/long) (slab count) divide the slab in two or three pieces and are usually caused by a combination of repeated traffic loading, thermal gradient curling and repeated moisture loading.
• PCC Patching, Large/Utility Cut (slab count) is an area where the original pavement has been removed and replaced by new pavement.
• PCC Patching, Small (slab count) is an area where the original pavement has been removed and replaced by filler material.
• PCC Polished Aggregate (slab count) is caused by repeated traffic applications. There are no rough or angular aggregate particles to provide good skid resistance. • PCC Popouts (slab count) is a small piece of pavement that breaks loose from the surface due to freeze-thaw action, combined with expansive aggregates. Usually range in diameter from 1 to 4 inches and in depth from ½ to 2 inches. • PCC Punchout (slab count) is a localized area of the slab that is broken into pieces. This distress is caused by heavy repeated loads, inadequate slab thickness, loss of foundation support or localized concrete construction deficiency.
• PCC Scaling/Map Cracking/Crazing (slab count) is a network of shallow, fine or hairline cracks that extend only through the upper surface of the concrete. Usually caused by concrete over-finishing and may lead to scaling, which is the breakdown of the slab surface to a depth of ¼ to ½ in.
• PCC Shrinkage Cracks (slab count) are hairline cracks usually less than 6 feet long and do not extend across entire slab. They are formed during the setting and curing of the concrete and do not extend through the depth of the slab. • PCC Spalling, Corner (slab count) is the breakdown of the slab within 1.5 feet of the corner. Usually caused by traffic loading or infiltration of incompressible materials, weak concrete and/or water accumulation and freeze-thaw action. • PCC Spalling, Joint (slab count) is the breakdown of the slab edges within 1.5 feet of the joint. Usually caused by traffic loading or infiltration of incompressible materials, weak concrete and/or water accumulation and freeze-thaw action.

19.B.

47 | P a g e
12 Appendix II: Automated Data Collection Equipment

12.1 Roadway Asset Collection (RAC) Vehicle
To determine the general distress characteristics of each roadway segment, RAS utilized one of our RAC vehicles, presented in Figure 12.1, to collect street level (ROW) imagery and downward (LCMS-2) pavement imagery.

The RAC vehicle components include:

Navigation System
• Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU): Generates a true representation of vehicle motion in all three axes; producing continuous, accurate position and orientation information. • PCS: Applanix POS/LV Computer System with DGPS (Provides accurate GPS coordinates for each subsystem) enables raw GPS data from as few as one satellite to be processed directly into the system, to compute accurate positional information in areas of intermittent, or no GPS reception.
• GPS Receivers: Embedded GPS receivers provide heading aiding to supplement the inertial data.
• GPS Antennas: Two GPS antennas generate raw observables data. • Sub-meter accuracy: The system is rated to get 0.3 m accuracy in the X, Y position and

0.5 m in the Z position.

Distance Measuring Indicator (DMI)
• Computes wheel rotation information to aid vehicle positioning and collect highresolution imagery at posted speeds.

Cameras
• Point Gray Ladybug 5+ 32MP 360 camera (Utilized for accurate ROW asset capture and extraction). This system is far superior to multiple mounted independent HD cameras others use.

Pavement Imaging System
• Second-generation Pavemetrics Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS-2) provides 1mm resolution pavement imagery for automatic and continuous measuring of pavement cracking, texture, rutting geometrics, and other pavement distresses • LCMS-2 camera is a laser array providing images used to evaluate data that conforms with ASTM D6433 protocols and provides a detailed array of data using two 1-millimeter resolution line scan cameras. A 1mm resolution is equivalent to over 4,000 laser points across the driven lane.
• Allows fully illuminated pavement image collection even in heavy shadow/canopy areas Laser Crack Measuring
System (LCMS-2)

19.B.

48 | P a g e
Pavement Ride Quality
• An inertial profiler with line lasers (Used to capture International Roughness Index (IRI) measurements).

Figure 12.1: RAS RAC Vehicle

12.2 Quality Control/Assurance
All subsystems for the RAS vans are integrated using International Cybernetics Corporation’s (ICC) collection core with tight synchronization between all data streams on the truck in real-time, referenced to both time and distance. All sensor locations are calibrated to the vehicle, together with the GPS and IMU, using 3D translations and rotations. This allows for the rapid calculation of the precise location of all sensor data. The RAC vehicle has received independent inertial profiler certification for accuracy and repeatability from the National Center for Asphalt Technology at Auburn University.

RAS RAC image collection includes a daily check of the on-board systems. This vehicle component check includes a calibration site survey of a nine-point grid in state plane coordinates (Figure

12.2). Each morning and afternoon, before and after a day’s image collection, the RAC vehicle drives over the surveyed location. The RAC technician then extracts each point’s location to verify the location of the point extracted was within approximately three feet of the surveyed points.

RAS’ QA/QC manual includes further details regarding RAC quality control procedures.

Ladybug 360
o
Right-of-Way Camera
NCAT Certified 3-Laser Profiler

19.B.

49 | P a g e
Figure 12.2: 9-Point Calibration Site Example
Calibration of the laser profiling system includes laser sensor checks and block tests to ensure the accuracy of the height sensors, accelerometer calibration “bounce tests” to verify proper functioning of the height sensors and accelerometers and distance calibration to ensure accuracy of the DMI. Calibration of the DMI and some accelerometers occurs during field testing, and each is checked and recalibrated on a regular basis.

During image collection, the RAC technician reviews the images collected on-screen as they are collected and any issue with image clarity requires the collection run to end and the image quality issue to be resolved. This provides real-time verification that the equipment is operating correctly. Once resolved, the collection run begins from the beginning for the road segment collected. The RAC technician also monitors GPS reception during collection. If GPS reception is lost measured using positional dilution of precision (PDOP), the RAC technician stops the collection and resolves the GPS reception issue. Collection begins again once the GPS reception issue is resolved. The RAC technician will check each camera’s exposure rate, image quality and GPS and IMU operation to ensure the RAC system is recording the image, GPS, DMI and IMU data and that the GPS location is within the stated project tolerance.

Each day’s image and road data collection are recorded on a RAC server. Each night, the day’s collection data is backed up to an external hard drive. The external hard drives are then mailed back to RAS’ project office where the data is placed on a production server for post-processing of images and data, quality control review and pavement distress inventory.

19.B.

50 | P a g e
The QC program for pavement condition data collection typically includes random sample audits, inter-rater reproducibility and data checks for accuracy and repeatability of the results. For this survey project random samples of the pavement condition data were selected and checked by the lead rater and QC personnel. If the pavement condition ratings did not meet quality standards, corrective action was taken, and the entire section was reviewed.

Cameras
• High-definition cameras with precision lenses allow for accurate asset extraction and videolog recording, but with lower frame rate: 15 images per second, with lower 1936x1456 color resolution.

Pavement Imaging System
• Two line-scan cameras and lasers configured to image 4m transverse road sections with 1 mm resolution (4000 pixel) at speeds that can reach 100 km/h, upgraded to the 3D imagery of the LCMS-2 camera system.

The QC program for pavement condition data collection typically includes random sample audits, inter-rater reproducibility and data checks for accuracy and repeatability of the results. For this survey project random samples of the pavement condition data were selected and checked by the lead rater or QC personnel. The QC selection process includes but is not limited to random sampling at ten-point PCI range increments with a minimum of 10% per range, a complete verification for any road with a ‘Very Poor’, “Serious”, or “Failed” PCI (0-40 PCI), a review of all high-density distresses, and a spatial review of neighboring PCI’s. If the pavement condition ratings did not meet quality standards, corrective action was taken, and the entire section was reviewed.

12.3 LCMS-2
Downward-facing LCMS-2 pavement imagery is collected for use in quantifying distress type, severity, and extents present on segments of road. The resolution of the imagery allows for distresses to be easily identified and measured during the analysis portion of the contract.

Pavemetrics’ Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS) is a high-speed and high-resolution transverse profiling system. Capable of acquiring full 4-meter width 3D profiles of a highway lane.

At normal traffic speed, the system uses two laser profilers that acquire the shape of the pavement. Both the resolutions and acquisition rate of the LCMS are high enough to perform automatic cracking detection, macro-texture evaluation, rutting measurements, and much more.

Custom optics and high-power pulsed laser line projectors allow the system to operate in full daylight or in nighttime conditions. Road profile data are collected onboard the inspection vehicle.

12.4 Profile
A road profile is a set of (X,Z) data points captured along the transversal axis of the road. A profile is captured each time the LCMS controller receives a trigger signal from the vehicle's odometer1.

Typically, the LCMS system can capture one road profile every few millimeters (5 mm at

19.B.

51 | P a g e
100km/h). Each profile consists of up to 4160 data points. This value will be referred to later in this document as being the number of points per profile.

The longitudinal profile of the road is generated by measuring its shape along an imaginary line in the direction of travel or longitudinal axis of the road. The longitudinal profile can then be used to compute various roughness indexes such as the IRI (International Roughness Index). The following guidelines should be followed to ensure proper readings from the Roughness subsystem:
• Maintain the recommended tire pressure.
• Ensure the wheels are balanced.
• Drive at speeds between 15.5 mph and 60 mph.
• Avoid quick accelerations and decelerations and sudden changes in direction.

A road section is a set of consecutive profiles that are merged and saved in a common file. A road section can be seen as a set of 3D coordinates (X, Y ,Z), where X is the coordinate along the transversal axis of the road, Y along the longitudinal axis, and Z is the depth axis, as displayed I Figure 12.3. The road section length is configurable and is set by the user before starting the acquisition. A typical road section length is between 5 to 10 meters.

Figure 12.3: LCMS Data Definition
Z
Y
X

19.B.

Hemet Pavement Condition Comparison
Citywide pavement a ssmcm rcauita i 2022 and 202s
ur a
I 2022 I 2025
wa coo Permian!niNewarkbyArea
10all I I. I. _- II II
Very Poor Poor Marginal Fair Good Very Good Excellent
(0 to 25) (26 to 40) (4| to 50) (5‘ lo 60) (61 i0 70) (71 to 85) (85 [0100) AVERAGEOVERALLCONDITIONIDEX(OCI) VAVEMENTBAtKLDG
(POOR ~ VERV?00R [0NDIVIDN) +11 ‘22-1 52
2022
-> 6
2025 Higher
m
is berm

47.5%»
20“

25.4%
2°25
W
Law isMlle!

19.B.

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Oct 13 2026
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Noah Rau, Interim City Manager;
☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☒ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

Council Review and Direction Regarding a Proposed Six-Month Weston Park Weekends Pilot Program at Weston Park
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Review and discuss the proposed Weston Park Weekends six-month pilot program.

2. Provide direction to staff regarding whether to authorize the pilot program as proposed, approve a modified program subject to additional conditions, or decline the proposal.

3. If the Council supports proceeding, direct staff to negotiate an operating agreement establishing appropriate terms, conditions, and City oversight, and return for Council consideration as necessary.

4. Direct that any continuation beyond the initial pilot period be subject to separate City review and approval, including consideration of a competitive procurement process, as appropriate.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City has received a proposal to establish Weston Park Weekends, a privately operated six-month pilot program featuring local vendors, food trucks, family activities, and community events. The proposed program would operate up to three days per week from November 2026 through April 2027.

The applicant would be responsible for event operations, security, insurance, maintenance, and applicable City fees, with no direct City funding requested.

The proposal offers potential community and economic development benefits while raising considerations regarding park access, public safety, operational impacts, and long-term use of City property.

Staff is seeking City Council direction on whether to authorize the pilot, approve a modified program, or decline the proposal. Any continuation beyond the pilot would require separate City consideration, including evaluation of whether a competitive procurement process is appropriate or required.

19.C.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

Christopher Rael submitted a proposal for "Weston Park Weekends," a privately operated recurring community activation at Weston Park. The proposal describes a six-month pilot from November 2026 through April 2027 intended to activate the park, support local businesses and entrepreneurs, provide family and community programming, and test whether a recurring market/event model is appropriate for Weston Park.

The proposal identifies Valley Community Partners, LLC as the proposed operating entity, with Mr.

Rael serving as Founder and Managing Member. The applicant states that the entity would be formally established upon City approval and before operations begin. Under the proposal, the operator would plan, administer, and operate the program, including vendor coordination, event logistics, insurance, contracted security, setup and breakdown, site management, cleanup, and dayto-day administration. The City would retain its normal permitting, regulatory, public-safety, and parkoversight responsibilities.

The applicant proposes three distinct weekly operating days. Thursday is described as the lighter and most flexible test day, Saturday as the primary weekly activation, and Sunday as a family-oriented daytime program incorporating local commerce, food, youth activities, and community programming.

Day / Hours Estimated
Attendance Estimated Vendors Applicant's Concept
Thursday, 1:00-5:00
PM 100-250 10-18 Lighter weekday activation/test day
Saturday, 1:00-5:00
PM 250-500 20-30 Primary weekly activation
Sunday, 9:00 AM2:00 PM 150-350 15-25
Family/communityoriented daytime
program
The applicant's calendar identifies 77 potential event dates over the six-month period. The proposal is structured as a pilot, and the applicant indicates that operating days may be modified, reduced, or paused if participation or operating experience does not support continued weekly operation.

DISCUSSION:

APPLICANT'S PROPOSED OPERATING MODEL
The applicant proposes an operationally self-contained model. Valley Community Partners would be responsible for routine event operations and would arrange and pay for privately contracted event security. The applicant proposes to maintain commercial general liability insurance at levels required by the City and to name the City as an additional insured as required.

The proposal anticipates approximately $100 per event day for standard vendor spaces and food trucks, with higher fees for larger or specialty spaces and sponsor/premium activations. Applicantgenerated revenue would be used to offset security, insurance, staffing, cleanup, City fees, programming, marketing, administration, equipment, and other operating costs.

19.C.

The applicant states that it expects to pay applicable City permit, review, park-use, fire, inspection, and other required fees and is not currently requesting ongoing City event staff, setup crews, cleanup crews, equipment, or an operating subsidy.

COUNCIL POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
The proposal presents a policy question for the City Council regarding whether recurring privately operated programming of Weston Park should be tested through a limited pilot. In considering the request, the Council may wish to consider the following:
 Frequency and intensity of use. The proposal includes up to 77 event dates and would use the park three days per week. Council may consider whether the proposed frequency is appropriate or whether a smaller initial schedule would provide a sufficient test.  Community and economic-development benefits. The proposal is intended to create recurring activity, provide opportunities for local vendors and entrepreneurs, and involve community, youth, civic, and business partners.
 Public access and competing uses. Recurring programmed use could affect general public use of portions of the park and may need to accommodate City events, maintenance, weather, park conditions, or other scheduled uses.
 Operational risk and City oversight. Final requirements for insurance, indemnification, security, emergency access, parking, sanitation, utilities, food service, fire safety, amplified sound, and protection of park facilities would need to be established before operations.  Fiscal impact and cost recovery. Although no City operating subsidy is proposed, staff time and City services may be required for permitting, review, inspections, oversight, or response.

Council may wish to confirm that applicable fees and cost-recovery requirements remain the responsibility of the operator.
 Pilot flexibility. If authorized, the City should retain the ability to modify dates, hours, site layout, security, vendor capacity, or other operating conditions, and to suspend or terminate the pilot if operational or public-safety concerns arise.
 Evaluation before continuation. Attendance, vendor demand, complaints, incidents, park impacts, City costs, and community response should be evaluated before any decision is made regarding continuation beyond the pilot.

PILOT CONDITIONS IF AUTHORIZED
If the Council elects to authorize a pilot, staff recommends that authorization be temporary and revocable and that the final agreement address, at a minimum:
 Legal formation and good standing of the operating entity and identification of responsible principals and an on-site event manager;
 Final schedule, setup and breakdown periods, site plan, vendor layout, emergency access, parking, loading/unloading, sanitation, utilities, amplified sound, and protection of landscaping and City facilities;
 Insurance, indemnification, additional-insured requirements, and vendor/subcontractor coverage as determined by the City;
 Security staffing and deployment based on attendance, site conditions, incident history, and Police Department guidance;
 Compliance with applicable business licensing, food service, fire, health, vendor, specialevent, and other regulatory requirements;

19.C.

 Payment of applicable City fees and reimbursement of City costs, together with responsibility for cleanup and event-related damage;
 City authority to impose reasonable operational conditions with appropriate blackout dates modifying the proposed schedule and to modify, cancel, suspend, or terminate operations when warranted; and
 No automatic renewal, exclusive right, or vested entitlement to continue operating at Weston Park after expiration of the pilot.

PROCUREMENT AND LONGER-TERM USE
The proposed six-month authorization is intended only as a limited pilot to evaluate the concept and operating model. Approval of the pilot should not be represented as selection of the operator for a permanent or long-term program, nor should it create an expectation of renewal.

If the City Council later determines that recurring programming of Weston Park should continue beyond the pilot, staff and the City Attorney should evaluate the appropriate process for any longerterm arrangement. Depending on the nature of the future program, the rights granted to an operator, use of City property, compensation or revenue arrangements, City funding or services, and other terms, a competitive procurement or other competitive selection process may be appropriate or required. The City should make that determination before negotiating or approving any extension beyond the pilot.

Accordingly, staff recommends that any pilot agreement expressly state that the pilot is temporary, nonexclusive, creates no preference or right to a future contract, and may not be extended or converted to a longer-term arrangement without separate City Council review and approval, including any procurement or competitive process determined necessary.

PILOT EVALUATION
The applicant proposes to track attendance and repeat visitation, vendor and food-truck demand, public response, vendor satisfaction, and operational performance, with monthly review points during the six-month period. If the pilot is authorized, staff recommends requiring monthly summary information on attendance estimates, vendor participation, incidents and medical/911 calls, complaints, parking and cleanup issues, property damage, cancellations, and corrective actions.

At the conclusion of the pilot, staff could return to the City Council with the results and options for discontinuation, modification, or consideration of a longer-term program. Any longer-term program would be separately evaluated, including the appropriate procurement or selection method.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL TWO: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
To ensure that Hemet is a hub, with access to quality jobs, shopping options, and a varied and sustained tax base.

Objective 1: Develop business practices that welcome new development by streamlining processes.

Objective 2: Provide resources for new businesses to enhance the customer service experience.

19.C.

GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.

Objective 1: Deliver messaging to the Community that connects, is consistent, and relevant.

Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.

Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No direct City operating subsidy is proposed by the applicant. The applicant indicates that it expects to pay applicable City permit, review, park-use, fire, inspection, and other required fees. Final City costs and cost-recovery requirements would be determined through departmental review. Any fee waiver, subsidy, or City-funded service not otherwise authorized by existing policy would require separate approval as applicable.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Authorize the six-month pilot substantially as proposed, subject to final City conditions and an operating agreement.

2. Authorize a modified pilot, such as fewer operating days, reduced frequency, a shorter initial term, different hours, or other conditions established by the Council.

3. Direct staff to return with additional information or negotiated terms before the Council takes action.

4. Decline to authorize the pilot at Weston Park.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment No.1 - Weston Park Weekends 6-month Proposal Attachment No.2 - Weston Park Weekends Conceptual Site Plan

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS
SIX-Mnh0 t Pilot Ppro osal
Weston Park - Hemet, California
Prepared for
City of Hemet
Prepared by
Christopher Rael
September 2026
A recurring community activation designed to support local businesses, strengthen community connections, and create positive, consistent use Weston Park.

November 2026 - April 2027

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Weston Park Weekends is a privately operated, recurring community event designed to make Weston Park a vibrant weekly gathering place for Hemet residents, families, local businesses, community organizations, and visitors.

This is a proven placemaking and small-business—development model already operating successfully in neighboring Riverside County communities. Weston‘ParkWeekends adapts that model speci?cally for Hemet and Weston Park.

Bring people together, support local enterprise, and create a positive reason to spend time in - Local small—businessand artisan vendors
- Food trucks and specialty food vendors
- Featured sponsor and demonstration areas
- Family, children, and teen activities
- Games, contests, demonstrations, and themed
programmmg
- Sunday Farmers Market programming
- Community Partners Area with complimentary
nonpro?t/civic space
- Seasonal and special programming

THE CONCEPT
Activate Weston Park — Create consistent, positive
use of the park and establish it as a recognizable
community gathering place.

Support Local Businesses — Give businesses, food
operators, makers, and entrepreneurs an affordable,
visible way to reach customers and build awareness.

Strengthen Community Connections — Create a
place where residents can gather, participate, and
discover local organizations.

Create Experiences for Families — Offer recurring
hands-on activities for children, teens, and families.

Increase Activity in Central Hemet — Bring
residents and visitors into the area on a predictable
schedule while supporting placemaking and
economic—development goals.

PURPOSE
A six-month operating test, not a
permanent commitment.

THE PILOT
NOVEMBER 2026-APRIL 2027
Attendance, vendor participation,
community response, operations, safety,
and recurring-use performance.

MEASURE AND ADJUST
Primarily privately funded, with City
involvement focused on authorization,
permitting, review, public-safety
coordination, and park use.

PRIVATELY OPERATED
Make Weston Park a place where something is happening every week — a place to eat, explore, participate, meet people, discover local businesses, bring the family, and experience Hemet in a di?'erent way.

THE VISION
Three days. Three different experiences. One community gathering place.

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

OPERATGT&SOSLTS IN EN ITY RE P N IBI I IE
Six—MonthPilot | November 2026 - April 2027
Valley Community Partners, LLC willserve as
the operating organization for Weston Park
Weekends.

Economic development, local business
participation, community programming,
public—spaceactivation, and professionally
managed community events.

One accountab e operator. C ear responsib lities.

City oversight remains with the City.

PROPOSEDOPERKHNGENTHY
Single-member LLC led by Christopher Rael,
Founder &Managing Member. The LLCwillbe
formally established upon City approval and
before event operations begin.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Weston Park Weekends willbe Valley
Community Partners' ?rst major park-activation
project and willoperate as a six-month pilot.

FIRST MAJOR PROJECT
Valley Community Partners, LLCwillplan, administer and operate Weston Park Weekends, including vendor coordination, event logistics, insurance, contracted security, setup and breakdown, site management, cleanup, and day-to-day management of the pilot.

Valley Community Partners operates the program. The City retains its normal permitting, regulatory, public-safety, and park-oversight responsibilities.

OPERATING RESPONSIBILITY

CITYI OPERATOR SEPARATION

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

OPE RATING ENTITY DETAILE
Six-Month Pilot | November 2026D- April 2027
Valley Community Partners, LLCwillbe the single accountable operating entity for Weston Park Weekends, with Christopher Rael serving as Founder and Managing Member.

CLEAR ACCOUNTABILITY
Valley Community Partners is the proposed operating entity for the pilot. Itwillbe organized as a California single-member limited liabilitycompany upon City approval and before event operations begin. Christopher Rael willserve as Founder and Managing Member and willbe the primary point of accountability for the City.

1. FORMATION 8: GOVERNANCE
The LLC is intended to support community-based economic development, local business participation. community programming, public-space activation, and professionally managed events. Weston Park Weekends willbe its ?rst major park-activation project. while the organization is structured for broader community and economic-development work.

2. PURPOSE OF THE ORGANIZATION
Valley Community Partners willplan and manage the event; coordinate vendors; administer participation and fees;
arrange required insurance and contracted secun'ty; manage setup, breakdown, site logistics, event-day operations, maintenance and cleanup; and address operational issues during the pilot.

3. OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES
The operating entity willhandle vendor agreements,
event-related contracts.operating expenses, recordkeeping, payments to service providers, and other routine
administrative functions. Vendor revenue and operating
costs willbe managed through the LLCrather than through the City.

4. ADMINISTRATION& FINANCIALCONTROL
Valley Community Partners willoperate Weston Park Weekends. The City willretain its normal authority for permits, park rules.public-safety coordination, code and regulatory requirements. and oversight of City property. The proposal does not require the City to become the day-to-day event operator.

5. CITYI OPERATOR SEPARATION
The six-month pilot is designed to allow practical adjustments as real operating data is collected. Schedule, hours, vendor mix,site operations, security levels, parking procedures, maintenance practices, or programming may be modi?ed in response to attendance, neighborhood impacts, safety concerns, City feedback, or other operational conditions. Material issues willbe communicated promptly to the appropriate City contact.

6. PILOT ACCOUNTABILITY& ADJUSTMENTS

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

SC HEDULE, ATTENDANCE, VENDORS&FEES
Six-Month Pilot | November 2026 - April2027
Standard 10x10 vendor $100 per event day
Food truck $100 per event day
Large / specialty space Higher fee; current example $250 for 20x30 Sponsors / premium activations Higher negotiated fee based on visibility and size Each day tests a different audience, participation level and vendor mix.

THREE DISTINCT DAYS - ONE SELF-SUSTAININGOPERATING MODEL Attendance: 100-250 attendees Vendor range: 10-18 vendors Lighter weekday activation and test day. Thursday can be modi?ed, reduced, or paused if participation does not justify weekly operation.

THURSDAY | 1:00-5:00 PM
Attendance: 250-500 attendees Vendor range: 20-30 vendors Primary weekly activation and largest programmed day. Saturday is the upper planning case for staf?ng, security, parking and cleanup.

SATURDAY | 1:00-5:00 PM
Attendance: 150-350 attendees Vendor range: 15-25 vendors Family-focused daytime program with local vendors, food, youth activities and community programming SUNDAY | 9:00 AM-2:00 PM

FEES & REVENUE MODE
Vendors reserve and pay online. Valley Community Partners willalso actively recruit larger vendors, regional businesses and sponsors.

ONLINE RESERVATION & RECRUITMENT
Vendor. food-truck.specialty-space and sponsorship revenue is used to offset security, insurance, staf?ng, cleanup, City fees, programming, marketing, administration and other operating costs.

HOW REVENUE IS USED

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

SCHEDULE, ATTENDANCE, VENDORS & FEES DETAILE
Six-Month Pilot | November 2026 -April 2027 D
The three-day structure lets Valley Community Partners and the City compare which days, audiences.vendor levels and formats perform best before any long-term schedule is established.

THE PILOT IS DESIGNED TO TEST THE MODEL
A lighter test day with approximately 100-250 attendees and 10-18 vendors. Thursday is intentionally the most ?exible day and can be modified, reduced, or paused if attendance does not justify continued weekly operation

1. THURSDAY - 1:00-5:00 PM
The primary weekly activation, with approximately 250-500 attendees and 20-30 vendors. Saturday represents the upper planning case for staf?ng, security, parking, cleanup and vendor demand.

2. SATURDAY - 1:00-5:00 PM
A family-oriented daytime format with approximately 150—350attendees and 15-25 vendors, combining loca commerce, food, youth activities and community programming. l

3. SUNDAY - 9:00 AM-2:00 PM
Standard 10x10 vendor spaces: $100 per event day. Food
trucks: $100 per event day. Larger or specialty footprints carry a higher fee based on space and operating needs; a current working example is $250 for a 20x30 specialty space. Sponsor and premium activation fees are negotiated separately based on visibility. size and participation.

4. VENDOR FEE STRUCTURE
Vendor applications, reservations and payments willbe
handled through an online reservation system, creating a record of participating businesses, dates reserved, space type and fees paid. Valley Community Partners willalso
actively recruit larger vendors, regional businesses and sponsors rather than relying only on passive online
signups.

5. ONLINE RESERVATION & RECRUITMENT
Vendor fees, food-truck fees, specialty-space fees and sponsorship revenue are operating revenue for Weston Park Weekends. Those funds are used to offset security, liabilityinsurance.staf?ng, cleanup. trash service, equipment, programming, marketing, payment processing, administration.City fees and other event expenses.

Gross vendor revenue can be estimated directly from actual participation. Net operating results should be based on actual pilot revenue and actual operating costs rather than a guessed pro?t margin. The goal is a ?nancially self-sustaining event model that does not depend on ongoing City operating subsidies.

6. HOW EVENTREVENUEIS USED
GROSS REVENUE VS. NET OPERATING RESULT

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS
SECUR ITY, INSURANCE, CITY FEES 8: RESOURCES
Six-Month Pilot | November 2026 - April 2027
Valley Community Partners carries the operating burden; the City retains normal oversight.

THE EVENTIS DESIGNED TO BE OPERATIONALLY SELFCONTAINED Privately contracted event security willbe arranged and paid for by Valley Community Partners. Final staf?ng can be adjusted based on attendance, operating conditions and City direction.

SECURITY
Commercial general liabilitycoverage willbe maintained for the event.with the City added as additional insured i f required. Vendor certificates of insurance may be required where appropriate.

INSURANCE
Valley Community Partners expects to pay applicable City permit, review, park-use, ?re or other required fees The pilot is not based on an assumption that normal City fees willbe waived.

CITY FEES
No ongoing City event staff, setup crews, cleanup crews, equipment or operating subsidy are currently anticipated. Event staff, vendors and volunteers willhandle routine event operations.

CITY RESOURCES
The proposed emergency medical response plan is 911 activation through the designated on-site event lead.

Dedicated on-site EMS is not currently proposed unless Fire/Life Safety determines that it is required based on event size or operating conditions.

EMERGENCY RESPONSE] EMS
Police, Fire and ambulance/EMS providers may be invited to operate outreach tents for community engagement, safety education, recruiting or demonstrations. Their presence would not be relied upon as dedicated event-response coverage unless speci?cally arranged for that purpose.

PUBLIC-SAFETY OUTREACH

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS
SECUR ITY, lNSURANCE, CITY FEES & RESOURCES . DETA LE
Six-Month Pilot | November 2026 - D April 2027
There is no substantial City setup or breakdown
requirement. Valley Community Partners, vendors.staff and volunteers willhandle event-owned materials, vendor
coordination, activity areas, signage, routine setup and breakdown, trash monitoring, cleanup and the ?nal site
check. Vendors remain responsible for their own spaces.

Routine event operations are handled by Valley Community Partners, its vendors, contractors, staff and volunteers rather than by City operating personnel.

OPERATING PRINCIPLE
Valley Community Partners will arrange and pay for privately contracted event security. Staf?ng can be adjusted during the pilot based on attendance, incident history. site conditions and City or Police guidance. The intent is not to rely on Hemet Police as routine event security.

1. SECURITY
Commercial general liability insurance willbe maintained at the coverage level required by the City, with the City named as an additional insured if required. Food trucks.specialty vendors or other higher-risk participants may be required to provide their own certi?cates of insurance.

2. INSURANCE
Valley Community Partners expects to pay applicable City permit, review, park-use, ?re, inspection or other required fees. The ?nancial model is intended to absorb those costs through event revenue rather than depend on ongoing Cit operating subsidies or routine fee waivers. y

3. CITY FEES
No additional ongoing City operational resources are currently anticipated beyond normal permitting, regulatory review, public-safety coordination and access to the
approved park area. The City is not being asked to provide routine event staf?ng. cleanup crews, setup crews,
equipment, vendor management or an operating subsidy.

5. CITY RESOURCES
The proposed emergency medical response plan is 911 activation through the designated on-site event lead. Dedicated on-site EMS is not currently proposed unless Fire/Life Safety determines that it is required based on event size. attendance or operating conditions. Any additional requirement identi?ed during City review can be incorporated into the plan.

6. EMERGENCY RESPONSE I EMS
Police, Fire and ambulance/EMS providers may be invited for community outreach, safety education or demonstrations. Their presence willnot be treated as dedicated event-response staf?ng unless speci?cally arranged

PUBLIC-SAFETY OUTREACH - SEPARATE FROM RESPONSE COVERAGE

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

SUCCESS MEASURE MENT & PILOT EVALUAT O
Six-Month Pilot | November 2026 - April2027
Success means sustained demand, public support, vendor participation and smooth operations.

MEASURE EVERY EVENT. REVIEWEVERY MONTH. EVALUATE AT SIX MONTHS .

Standardized crowd estimates willbe taken at regular intervals using the same counting method and park zones so monthly trends can be compared consistently.

PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
Track spaces ?lled, repeat vendors, food-truck participation, future reservations and businesses requesting space after slots are ?lled.

VENDOR DEMAND
A Public Information &Survey Booth willcollect short visitor surveys on repeat attendance, satisfaction, what brought them to WPW and whether they want the program to continue.

PUBLIC RESPONSE
Participating vendors willreceive a short post-event survey. Repeat bookings willalso be tracked because choosing to return is one of the strongest measures of satisfaction.

VENDOR SATISFACTION
Track security incidents, medical calls, complaints, parking issues, cleanup problems, vendor violations, property damage and whether the park is restored at closing.

OPERATIONS
Month 1 establishes the baseline. Month 2 identi?es needed adjustments. Month 3 provides an early validation point.

Months 4-5 test whether demand and operations remain sustainable after the initialnovelty. Month 6 provides the full pilot evaluation.

MONTHLY REVIEW
Ifparticipation grows beyond the level anticipated for normal operations. staffing, security, parking. sanitation and other needs willbe reviewed with the City and adjusted appropriately.

GROWTH WILL GUIDE OPERATING ADJUSTMENTS

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS
perations est whslhe
valuation six-month
panicip
r needs
Track spaces ?lled, repeat vendors, future reservations.food-truck participation and businesses requesting space after available slots are ?lled. With 30 vendor spaces, unmet demand and wait-list interest matter because a full event can otherwise appear numerically ?at.

2. VENDOR & FOOD-TRUCK DEMAND

SUCCESS EASURE ENT & PILOT EVALUAT ON - DETA LE
Six-Month Pilot | November 2026 - April 2027 D
Simple, repeatable data willbe collected at every event, summarized monthly, and used to evaluate the six-month pilot

MEASUREMENTAPPROACH
Crowd estimates willbe taken at consistent intervals using the same counting route and park zones. The goal is a reliabl e trend line.not an exact turnstile count. Surveys willalso identify ?rst-time and repeat visitors.

1. ATTENDANCE & REPEAT VISITATION
A staffed Public Information& Survey Booth willcollect short surveys on satisfaction, repeat attendance, what attracted visitors and whether they want WPW to continue. A small low-cost participation item may encourage responses. Roaming volunteers may also collect brief surveys.

3. PUBLIC INFORMATION & SURVEY BOOTH
A short post-event survey willask whether the event met expectations, whether customer traf?c was worthwhile and whether the vendor would return. Actual repeat bookings willbe tracked as a strong behavioral measure of satisfaction.

4. VENDOR SATISFACTION
Each event willhave a brief internal record covering security incidents, medical or 911 calls, complaints, parking issues, cleanup concerns, vendor-rule issues, property damage, breakdown timing and City-requested adjustments.

5. OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE
Month 1 - Baseline. Month 2 - Early adjustments. Month 3 - Review attendance, repeat visitors, vendor return rates and o . Months 4-5 - T r demand remains strong after the opening-period novelty. Month 6 - Complete the full pilot e using the entire record.

Growth willbe viewed positively while also guiding operational adjustments. If ation exceeds normal expectations, Valley Community Partners willreview staf?ng, secun'ty, parking, sanitation and othe with the City.

6. MONTH-BY-MONTHPILOT REVIEW

PARTICIPATION GROWTH

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

I M NTH PILO LEND R
MB M N
SX- 0 TCA A
November 2026 - April2027
Thu: 5 12 19 26
Sat: 7 14 21 28
Sun: 1 8 15 22 29
13 event dates
OVE ER 2026
Thu: 4 11 18 25
Sat: 6 13 20 27
Sun: 7 14 21 28
event dates
FEB UARY 2027
Thu: 3 10 17 24 31
Sat: 5 12 19 26
Sun: 6 13 20 27
DECE BER 2026
Thu: 4 11 18 25
Sat: 6 13 20 27
Sun: 7 14 21 28
event dates
ARCH 2027
Thu: 7 14 21 28
Sat: 2 9 16 23 30
Sun: 3 10 17 24 31
JA UARY 2027
Thu: 1 8 15 22 29
Sat: 3 10 17 24
Sun: 4 11 18 25
APR L 2027
Thursday 1:00-5:00 PM | Saturday 1:00-5:00 PM | Sunday 9:00 AM-2:00 P TOTAL PROPOSED P LOT DATES: 77

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

REGOI NALPRE CEDENT
Regional examples from Riverside County
Recurring community markets are already being used nearby as p acemaking and sma I-business-development tools
First and third Thursdays in Downtown
Murrieta.

Approx. 7,000 attendees per event.

Estimated 154,000 annual visits.

City staff reported increased vendor
demand and expanded the event
footprint in 2026.

MURR ETA MARKET N GHTS
Monthly event supporting
entrepreneurs and small businesses.

Operating since 2022 in partnership
with the City. MSJC and Made Local.

Received a 2024 IEDC Excellence in
Economic Development Bronze Award.

Recognized in the Entrepreneurial &
Small Business Development category.

MEN FEE FOOD E FR DAYS
These nearby examples show that recurring public-space programming can support local businesses, increase foot traffic, strengthen community activity and grow over time when the operating model works.

WHY T MATTERS FOR HEMET

19.C.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

DETAILED REG IONAL PRECEDENT
Regional examples from Riverside County
Murrieta Market Nights operates in Downtown Murrieta on the first and third Thursday of each month.featuring local vendors.food trucks.artisans. live music and family-friendlyactivities.

In a May 2026 City Council staff report. Murrieta described the event as highly successful and well attended.

City staff reported average attendance of approximately 7,000 people per event and an estimated 154.000annual visits based on 22 events.

The same report stated that the existing event footprint had reached capacity because of success and increasing vendor participation. leading to a proposed 150-foot expansion.

Murrieta staff identified increased foot traffic, exposure for downtown retailers and restaurants. opportunities for small businesses and emerging entrepreneurs. and stronger community engagement as benefits of the event.

Downtown restaurant owners also reported noticeable increases in sales during Market Night events.

Menifee Foodie Fridays has operated since 2022 as a monthly marketplace supporting entrepreneurs and small businesses.

The program is presented in partnership with the City of Menifee.Mt. San Jacinto College and Made Local.

The City describes the event as a marketplace where entrepreneurs can showcase products, reach customers and build a customer base.

In 2024.the International Economic Development Council recognized the program with an Excellence in Economic Development Bronze Award.

The award was presented in the Entrepreneurial and Small Business Development category.

Both examples combine recurring programming with local vendors.food.community activity and economic-development objectives.

Both demonstrate that a recurring event can serve more than an entertainment function: it can also create customer exposure for small businesses and increase activity in a defined area.

Weston Park Weekends adapts the same general model to Hemet while using its own schedule, site plan. vendor rotation.Community Partners Area and family programming.

City of Murrieta City Council staff report. File No. 26-1850.May 5. 2026.

City of Murrieta calendar listing for Murrieta Market Nights. 2026.

City of Menifee news release.August 29. 2024: 2024 Excellence in Economic Development Award from IEDC.

MURRIETA MARKET NIGHTS

MENIFEE FOODIE FRIDAYS

RELEVANCE TO WESTON PARK WEEKENDS

SOURCES

19.C.

COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS &

VOLUNTEER DEVELOPMENT

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS
One Park. One Community. Many Partners.

WPW is designed to be builtwith Hemet - through student experience, civic service, business participation and community volunteers.

MSJC Digital Media - student media crew: video, photography, editing, social media and event coverage.

HUSD I CTE - career-connected experience in media, communications and event production.

Hemet Youth Council - Saturday Kids Zone and other appropriate youth-service roles Rotary Club of Hemet Hemet Sunset Rotary
Kiwanis Club of Hemet Valley Exchange Club of Hemet-San Jacinto Valley
Assistance League of Hemacinto Hemet Elks Lodge
Hemet Lions Club
Equipment + materials - recreation gear, kids activities, tables, chairs, signage and supplies.

Activity sponsorships - support a specific zone, program or featured event.

Professional support - storage, services, production help and other in-kind contributions.

WESTON PARK WEEKENDS | SIX-MONTH PILOT | NOVEMBER 2026 - APRIL 2027 EDUCATION + YOUTH
CIVIC + COMMUNITY SERVICE PARTNERS

LOCAL BUSINESS PARTNERS
REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE. REAL COMMUNITY BENEFIT.

Weston Park Weekends becomes not simply an event produced for the community, but an event increasingly built with the community.

19.C.

WESTONPARKWEEKENDS— EVENTSITEPLAN
SIX-Month Pilot | November 2025
- April 2027 | Conceptual permit attachment- Not to scale EVENTDPs
KIDSACTIVITY _,
-
ZONE mag

PREMIER

SPONSOR/
I VENDDRsPACE 234 (UpmzVuhicles) 5 a E sTAeEAREA :1 _ 1 E
s 'l
I
w
I
m c: :3 2 ,_
7 a:
a
I
"’
R
2 1" ===
m ”am a”
a I:
g
a
mm an.m em:
7 m
5 I
o
o
.—
m anmmm a... _.
s
a
f
mmm
m
m
g
g
6 >
=2 Lawmi?mmi‘ on-
< I" g ea: as: use m m
a: E”
9 la: a 8 3‘ 10 z..a._ n
C
>
n
“
Q
9 I:

I4
‘5
9 PUBLICSAFETVZONE
SOCIAL
{ COMMUNITVPARTNERSAREA
LEAGUEZONE 12'345579910
1 5
?
* II IzlxsIA I5 I! I1 13 IR 2n
.2

W FLORIDAAVENUE
LEGEND
|:|.LAWN/ ACTIVITVAREA
TREE
@ PLANTING/ LANDSCAPE

VENDORSPACE
10'
x 10'
rooD TRUCKSPACE

SUPPORT/ OPERANONS

TABLE/ BENCH

KEYSITEFEATURES
1,
z,
30 STANDARDVENDORSPACES
(10'
x 10‘).

UP TO20CUMPLIMENTARV

CDMMUNITVPARTNERSPACES
(10'
x 10')

DESIGNATEDFOODTRUCKAREA
ITHDMPSON STREET).

PREMIERSPONSOR/ VENDOR
SPACE(UPTD2 VEHICLES).

CLEAREMERGENCY. ADA,AND
PEDES‘IRIANCIRCULATION.

CONCEPTUALPLANSUBJECTo
FINALcm APPROVAL,
mum- wzsmumu wEENENDs
LOCATION: WIZSVUNPARK,
REMET,cALIrnRNIA
WEPAEDI’Y‘ EVENTPLANNINGCIT.

ME. Og/ls/mzs
SNEET: 10H

19.C.