Cities Index.
Agenda Packet

Hercules City Council
September 27, 2022

Document
Agenda Packet
Meeting
September 27, 2022
Body
Hercules City Council
Pages
140
Original file
154.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on hercules.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 11
1473
AT&T MOBILITY - HERCULES AVE & SAN PABLO (USID103583), 215 SKELLY RD., HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: AT&T EH&S Hotline - Option #1
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 308 S. Akard St., 17th Floor
Affiliation City: Dallas
Affiliation State: TX
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 75202
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: AT&T Mobility
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 308 S. Akard St., 17th Floor
Affiliation City: Dallas
Affiliation State: TX
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 75202
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dba AT&T Mobility Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 308 S. Akard St., 17th Floor
Affiliation City: Dallas
Affiliation State: TX
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 75202
Affiliation Phone: (214) 464-1712
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: Peter Burnell, Sigma Consultants, Inc.

Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: Jeremy McGrue

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 12
1474
AT&T MOBILITY - HERCULES AVE & SAN PABLO (USID103583), 215 SKELLY RD., HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Entity Title: National EPCRA Manager
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: AT&T Mobility
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (800) 566-9347

PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
OLD HIGHWAY 40, HERCULES, CA, 94567 1000251911
▲ A3
E <1/10 (101 ft. / 0.019 mi.)
26 ft. Higher Elevation 48 ft. Above Sea Level
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

Conditions:

Petroleum Hydrocarbon Chemicals of Concern: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Upgradient or Indeterminate: YES
HIST UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
Address: OLD HIGHWAY 40
City,State,Zip: HERCULES, CA 94567
File Number: 00023004
URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00023004.pdf Region: STATE
Facility ID: 00000019802
Facility Type: Other
Other Type: REFINERY
Contact Name: A. L. GUALTIERI
Telephone: 4157996600
Owner Name: THE COASTAL CORPORATION
Owner Address: NINE GREENWAY PLAZA
Owner City,St,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77046
Total Tanks: 0001

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 13
1475
PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY, OLD HIGHWAY 40, HERCULES, CA 94567 (Continued) Tank Num: 001
Container Num: UNL 001
Year Installed: 1966
Tank Capacity: 00002000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: UNLEADED
Container Construction Thickness: 0.4375
Leak Detection: Stock Inventor
Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: http://www.web.edrnet.com/ordering/switchboard/redirect.aspx?s=GRR_CA_HISTUST_PDF&img_id=000 23004

PACIFIC REFINING WHARF
LAT_122_16_15 WEST, HERCULES, CA, 94547 1001217660
▲ A4
E <1/10 (101 ft. / 0.019 mi.)
26 ft. Higher Elevation 48 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Upgradient or Indeterminate: YES
RCRA-SQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19980422
Handler Name: PACIFIC REFINING WHARF
Handler Address: LAT_122_16_15 WEST
Handler City,State,Zip: HERCULES, CA 94547
EPA ID: CAR000038968
Contact Name: RALPH EDWARDS
Contact Address: NINE GREENWAY PLAZA
Contact City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77046
Contact Telephone: 713-877-3929
Contact Fax: Not Reported
Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: County
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: Not Reported
State District: Not Reported
Mailing Address: NINE GREENWAY PLAZA
Mailing City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77046

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 14
1476
PACIFIC REFINING WHARF, LAT_122_16_15 WEST, HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Owner Name: PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: Not Reported
Operator Type: Not Reported
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:

No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:

No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:

NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:

Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:

No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:

No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:

No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:

No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 15
1477
PACIFIC REFINING WHARF, LAT_122_16_15 WEST, HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:

No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:

No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20021007
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:

No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Hazardous Waste Summary:

Waste Code: D001
Waste Description: IGNITABLE WASTE
Handler - Owner Operator:

Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NINE GREENWAY PLAZA
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77046
Owner/Operator Telephone: 713-877-3929
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:

Receive Date: 19980422
Handler Name: PACIFIC REFINING WHARF
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: Not Reported
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:

No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 16
1478
PACIFIC REFINING WHARF, LAT_122_16_15 WEST, HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:

NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:

Evaluations: No Evaluations Found

SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000155290
▲ 5
S <1/10 (499 ft. / 0.095 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
RCRA-SQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19861110
Handler Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Handler Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAD981658974
Contact Name: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
Contact Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE
Contact City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Contact Telephone: 415-724-3314
Contact Fax: Not Reported
Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Other
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 17
1479
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: CA
State District: 2
Mailing Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE
Mailing City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Owner Name: JIM CHRISTENSEN
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Operator Type: Private
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:

No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:

No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:

NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:

Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:

No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:

No

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 18
1480
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:

No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:

No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:

No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:

No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20020627
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:

No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Handler - Owner Operator:

Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: JIM CHRISTENSEN
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 19
1481
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:

Receive Date: 19861110
Handler Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: CA
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:

No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:

NAICS Code: 811111
NAICS Description: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:

Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
LUST: Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Lead Agency: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site
Geo Track: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0601300540 Global Id: T0601300540
Latitude: 38.007673
Longitude: -122.28832
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 07/09/2015
Case Worker: MYM
RB Case Number: 07-0587
Local Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
File Location: Not Reported
Local Case Number: 71366
Potential Media Affect: Aquifer used for drinking water supply, Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 20
1482
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site History: The subject site (site) is located at 2500 San Pablo Avenue, Pinole, California in the partly industrial, and residential area of the city of Pinole, California. The site is the Former Square Deal Garage auto repair shop. The site is located between Valley Road and John Street.

Soil and groundwater contamination was discovered during underground storage tank (UST) removal at the site on February 11, 1992. Soil samples contained up to 1,700 parts per million (ppm) of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), 5 ppm of benzene and 21 ppm of xylenes. Groundwater samples contained up to 1,300 parts per billion (ppb) of TPHg, 1,400 ppb of benzene, and 510 ppb of ethylbenzenes.

LUST:

Global Id: T0601300540
Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker
Contact Name: SUE LOYD
Organization Name: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.

City: MARTINEZ
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: Not Reported
Global Id: T0601300540
Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker
Contact Name: MARTIN MUSONGE
Organization Name: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Address: 1515 CLAY STREET
City: OAKLAND
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: Not Reported
LUST:

Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 06/27/2014
Action: File Review - Closure
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/31/2012
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/15/2013
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Global Id: T0601300540

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 21
1483
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 01/13/2009
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 05/17/2013
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: Other
Date: 08/27/1991
Action: Leak Reported
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/01/2015
Action: Well Destruction Workplan
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 10/31/2014
Action: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 01/28/2014
Action: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR) Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 07/14/2010
Action: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR) Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: Other
Date: 06/26/1991
Action: Leak Stopped
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 10/29/2012
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/05/2013
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 03/29/2013
Action: File Review - Closure
Global Id: T0601300540

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 22
1484
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/19/2014
Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 07/09/2015
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/18/2015
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: Other
Date: 06/26/1991
Action: Leak Discovery
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/30/2013
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/31/2012
Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan - Regulator Responded Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/23/2014
Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/27/2015
Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded
LUST:

Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 06/26/1991
Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 09/01/1994
Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Open - Eligible for Closure
Status Date: 10/31/2014
Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Completed - Case Closed

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 23
1485
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Status Date: 07/09/2015
LUST REG 2:

Region: 2
Facility Id: 07-0587
Facility Status: Leak being confirmed
Case Number: 71366
How Discovered: Tank Closure
Leak Cause: UNK
Leak Source: UNK
Date Leak Confirmed: 9/1/1994
Oversight Program: LUST
Prelim. Site Assesment Wokplan
Submitted:

Not Reported
Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not Reported
Pollution Characterization Began: Not Reported
Pollution Remediation Plan
Submitted:

Not Reported
Date Remediation Action Underway: Not Reported
Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring
Began:

Not Reported
CERS HAZ WASTE: Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 70796
CERS ID: 10012105
CERS Description: Hazardous Waste Generator
FINDS: Other Ascertainable Records
Registry ID: 110002740721
Click Here: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110002740721 Environmental Interest/Information System:

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA.

STATE MASTER
The Click here to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. database contains http://www.edrnet.com/srf2/FinalSiteReport.aspx?ID=2a2aa11zah8O1x2gzw6dhg4jOJ2ExdAPgR8gwGAQdt2Vad1WaF7p1P2zzB3xh63HONAVx t3bgF29wP2daA2Fak181K7EzM9ohd1IO94sxG1RgL4cwv8Ldl0GgF3TjUtHJR22ag2caA1Y192Gzh1Xhc1IOi1cxy2sgt6qw463d23IgBAbjX1qJa1 additional records for this site. Please contact your EDR Account Executive for more information.

ECHO: Other Ascertainable Records
Envid: 1000155290
Registry ID: 110002740721
DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002740721 Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 24
1486
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Region: CORTESE
Envirostor Id: Not Reported
Global ID: T0601300540
Site/Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
Status Date: Not Reported
Site Code: Not Reported
Latitude: Not Reported
Longitude: Not Reported
Owner: Not Reported
Enf Type: Not Reported
Swat R: Not Reported
Flag: active
Order No: Not Reported
Waste Discharge System No: Not Reported
Effective Date: Not Reported
Region 2: Not Reported
WID Id: Not Reported
Solid Waste Id No: Not Reported
Waste Management Uit Name: Not Reported
File Name: Active Open
HIST CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
edr_fname: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
edr_fadd1: 2500 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Region: CORTESE
Facility County Code: 7
Reg By: LTNKA
Reg Id: 07-0587
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0028130
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HMBP: 1K-10K LBS, 0-19 EMPLOYEES
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 771366
CERS ID: 10012105

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 25
1487
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0028130
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG: 5 - <12 TONS/YEAR
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 771366
CERS ID: 10012105
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0028130
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 771366
CERS ID: 10012105
CERS: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 70796
CERS ID: 10012105
CERS Description: Chemical Storage Facilities
Violations:

Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 06-24-2014
Citation: HSC 6.67 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.67, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/27/2014.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 26
1488
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016. HWG REPORTING FORM Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS
Evaluation:

Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 06-24-2014
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 27
1489
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Enforcement Action:

Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-24-2014
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Coordinates:

Site ID: 70796
Facility Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Env Int Type Code: LUSTCS
Program ID: T0601300540

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 28
1490
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Coord Name: Not Reported
Ref Point Type Desc: Unknown
Latitude: 38.007673
Longitude: -122.288320
Affiliation:

Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 San Pablo AVE
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Property Owner
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 758-1325
Affiliation Type Desc: Regional Board Caseworker
Entity Name: MARTIN MUSONGE - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 1515 CLAY STREET
Affiliation City: OAKLAND
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Affiliation City: PINOLE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 29
1491
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94546
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: OWNER
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr.

Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Local Agency Caseworker
Entity Name: SUE LOYD - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.

Affiliation City: MARTINEZ
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: Patricia Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 30
1492
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 70796
CERS ID: T0601300540
CERS Description: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Site Violations:

Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 06-24-2014
Citation: HSC 6.67 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.67, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/27/2014.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016. HWG REPORTING FORM Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 31
1493
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Evaluation:

Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 06-24-2014
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Enforcement Action:

Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 32
1494
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-24-2014
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Coordinates:

Site ID: 70796
Facility Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Env Int Type Code: LUSTCS
Program ID: T0601300540
Coord Name: Not Reported
Ref Point Type Desc: Unknown
Latitude: 38.007673
Longitude: -122.288320
Affiliation:

Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Entity Title: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 33
1495
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 San Pablo AVE
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Property Owner
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 758-1325
Affiliation Type Desc: Regional Board Caseworker
Entity Name: MARTIN MUSONGE - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 1515 CLAY STREET
Affiliation City: OAKLAND
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94546
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: OWNER
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 34
1496
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr.

Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Local Agency Caseworker
Entity Name: SUE LOYD - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.

Affiliation City: MARTINEZ
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: Patricia Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 35
1497
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported

OCU-EASE OPTICAL PRODUCTS
629 TENNANT AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000111603
◆ B6
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (739 ft. / 0.14 mi.)
1 ft. Lower Elevation 21 ft. Above Sea Level
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Chemicals of Concern: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: OCU-EASE OPTICAL PRODUCTS
Address: 629 TENNANT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032940
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG: LESS THAN 5 TONS/YEAR
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 770413
CERS ID: 10009345

PACIFIC BELL
636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000251249
◆ B7
SW 1/10 - 1/3 (836 ft. / 0.158 mi.)
1 ft. Lower Elevation 21 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Chemicals of Concern: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 36
1498
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) RCRA-LQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19810119
Handler Name: PACIFIC BELL
Handler Address: 636 TENNENT AVENUE
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAT080020878
Contact Name: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
Contact Address: 636 TENNENT AVENUE
Contact City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94546
Contact Telephone: 408-491-6029
Contact Fax: Not Reported
Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Other
Federal Waste Generator Description: Large Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: CA
State District: 2
Mailing Address: 2 NORTH SECOND ST ROOM 1125
Mailing City,State,Zip: SAN JOSE, CA 95113
Owner Name: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: Not Reported
Operator Type: Not Reported
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: Yes
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:

No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:

No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 37
1499
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:

N
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:

Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:

No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:

No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:

No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:

No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:

No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:

No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20020627
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:

No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: No
Manifest Broker: No
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Handler - Owner Operator:

Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO Legal Status: Private

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 38
1500
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:

Receive Date: 19810119
Handler Name: PACIFIC BELL
Federal Waste Generator Description: Large Quantity Generator State District Owner: CA
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:

No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:

NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:

Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
FINDS: Other Ascertainable Records
Registry ID: 110006487355
Click Here: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110006487355 Environmental Interest/Information System:

California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities.

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA.

The Click here to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. database contains http://www.edrnet.com/srf2/FinalSiteReport.aspx?ID=4kd4otkSldEf2EkoIytSN9H2S0llmH345Euif7772dEzTkIy58UIL2ygU34lSzKN3sBNfHLw2KE 9GR0xLlkCB7Nmw3HCc4D9kwjdTt2BPoWltTp8yYSDxlyC38REPFfpc4DeESgkei4VGIp3ybWBZMSOYNZI46oHxL2723FN0Fglrs4rskPPdBQ3W 3ouTtdd2JFSbNl8L8QrE0VfrjAXfE2rkdx2M8I3byE85WkS.3Nrl2NEHJ223c5gm0eIlVw9fnmw7HXP1w.4Aw5uj4rOuK.iXMunc79X7Ak4SHkhFd5M 34LopCte92E7SWplco3niEo2fgo27hEU2kL42UzIQfyJi2P5SIANPj4QzHO.2p772M0YQlMr3mzmqSHgV4eG4c65aE62ZuUQi0dByJ7TK75N2 additional records for this site. Please contact your EDR Account Executive for more information.

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 39
1501
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) ECHO: Other Ascertainable Records
Envid: 1000251249
Registry ID: 110006487355
DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110006487355 Name: PACIFIC BELL
Address: 636 TENNENT AVENUE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564

HAROLD RICHMOND
2301 SAN PABLO AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 U001597869
▲ B8
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (972 ft. / 0.184 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
HIST UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: HAROLD RICHMOND
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
File Number: 00022EFD
URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00022EFD.pdf Region: STATE
Facility ID: 00000013126
Facility Type: Gas Station
Other Type: Not Reported
Contact Name: DEALER
Telephone: 4157243505
Owner Name: SHELL OIL COMPANY
Owner Address: P.O. BOX 4848
Owner City,St,Zip: ANAHEIM, CA 92803
Total Tanks: 0003
Tank Num: 001
Container Num: 1
Year Installed: 1980
Tank Capacity: 00010000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: PREMIUM
Container Construction Thickness: 1/4

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 40
1502
HAROLD RICHMOND, 2301 SAN PABLO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10 Tank Num: 002
Container Num: 3
Year Installed: 1980
Tank Capacity: 00010000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: UNLEADED
Container Construction Thickness: 1/4
Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10 Tank Num: 003
Container Num: 2
Year Installed: 1980
Tank Capacity: 00010000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: REGULAR
Container Construction Thickness: 1/4
Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10 Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: http://www.web.edrnet.com/ordering/switchboard/redirect.aspx?s=GRR_CA_HISTUST_PDF&img_id=000 22EFD

SHELL OIL CO
2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000288639
▲ B9
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (972 ft. / 0.184 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
RCRA-SQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19980408
Handler Name: SHELL OIL CO
Handler Address: 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAD981402134
Contact Name: SONDRA BIENVENU
Contact Address: P O BOX 4453
Contact City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77210-4453
Contact Telephone: 713-241-2258
Contact Fax: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 41
1503
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Private
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: Not Reported
State District: Not Reported
Mailing Address: P O BOX 4453
Mailing City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77210-4453
Owner Name: EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: Not Reported
Operator Type: Not Reported
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:

No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:

No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:

NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:

Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 42
1504
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:

No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:

No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:

No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:

No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:

No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:

No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20021007
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:

No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Hazardous Waste Summary:

Waste Code: D001
Waste Description: IGNITABLE WASTE
Waste Code: D018
Waste Description: BENZENE
Handler - Owner Operator:

Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 43
1505
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: P O BOX 4453
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77210-4453
Owner/Operator Telephone: 713-241-2258
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:

Receive Date: 19960901
Handler Name: SHELL OIL CO
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: Not Reported
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:

No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: No
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Receive Date: 19980408
Handler Name: SHELL OIL CO
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: Not Reported
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:

No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:

NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Violations: No Violations Found

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 44
1506
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Evaluation Action Summary:

Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
LUST: Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Lead Agency: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site
Geo Track: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0601300264 Global Id: T0601300264
Latitude: 38.006394
Longitude: -122.290037
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 09/24/2007
Case Worker: Not Reported
RB Case Number: 07-0284
Local Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
File Location: Not Reported
Local Case Number: 13126
Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline, Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon Site History: Not Reported
LUST:

Global Id: T0601300264
Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker
Contact Name: SUE LOYD
Organization Name: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.

City: MARTINEZ
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: Not Reported
LUST:

Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 09/24/2007
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/31/2006
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/05/2001

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 45
1507
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/16/2001
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 11/06/2019
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/12/1988
Action: Respond to Petition
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/10/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/01/2006
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/03/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/02/2001
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 11/06/2019
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/27/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 46
1508
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/11/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/02/2001
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/27/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/03/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/24/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/16/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/28/2019
Action: Correspondence
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/16/2007
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/10/1994

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 47
1509
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Well Destruction Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/26/2002
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/15/1991
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/23/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/03/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/24/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/31/2019
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/19/2006
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/16/2003

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 48
1510
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/04/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Well Installation Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 03/28/2007
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 06/06/2006
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 11/03/2006
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 10/04/2006
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/21/2001
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: Other
Date: 03/20/1984
Action: Leak Reported
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/04/2007
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/16/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/29/2001

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 49
1511
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/02/1998
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/30/1989
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/25/1989
Action: Well Installation Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/01/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/12/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/09/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/08/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/03/2001
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/06/1998
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/07/1989
Action: Other Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 02/03/2005

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 50
1512
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/28/2002
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/17/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/01/2006
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/23/2004
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/20/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/13/1992
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/30/2006
Action: Other Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 05/24/2004
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 12/06/2004
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/27/2004
Action: * Verbal Communication
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 09/30/2004

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 51
1513
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 09/21/2004
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: Other
Date: 07/20/1987
Action: Leak Stopped
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/03/2004
Action: Other Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/31/2004
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 11/22/2004
Action: CAP/RAP - Final Remediation / Design Plan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/04/2007
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/19/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/26/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/30/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/30/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/30/2003

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 52
1514
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/05/2005
Action: Unknown
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/30/2007
Action: CAP/RAP - Other Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/30/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 07/12/2001
Action: * Historical Enforcement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 06/19/2002
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: Other
Date: 07/20/1987
Action: Leak Discovery
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/06/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/05/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/04/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/03/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/02/2003

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 53
1515
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/01/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/30/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/29/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/28/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/27/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/26/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/25/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/24/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/27/2007
Action: CAP/RAP - Other Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/30/2004

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 54
1516
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/16/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: REMEDIATION
Date: 05/21/2007
Action: Excavation
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: REMEDIATION
Date: 05/21/2007
Action: Other (Use Description Field)
LUST:

Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 03/20/1984
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 12/12/1988
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 06/21/1989
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 02/01/2001
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 11/23/2004
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 12/02/2004
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 07/27/2007
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Verification Monitoring
Status Date: 07/31/2007
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 09/24/2007

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 55
1517
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) LUST REG 2:

Region: 2
Facility Id: 07-0284
Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway
Case Number: 13126
How Discovered: Tank Closure
Leak Cause: Structure Failure
Leak Source: Tank
Date Leak Confirmed: Not Reported
Oversight Program: LUST
Prelim. Site Assesment Wokplan
Submitted:

Not Reported
Preliminary Site Assesment Began: 12/12/1988
Pollution Characterization Began: 6/21/1989
Pollution Remediation Plan
Submitted:

Not Reported
Date Remediation Action Underway: 2/1/2001
Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring
Began:

Not Reported
SWEEPS UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: 6054-0204-SU-1
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000001
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10000
Active Date: 02-26-93
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: PRM UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: 4
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 56
1518
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: 6054-0204-RU-1
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000002
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10000
Active Date: 02-25-93
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: 6054-0204-REG1
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000003
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10000
Active Date: 02-26-93
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000005
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 550
Active Date: 06-20-88
Tank Use: OIL
STG: W
Content: WASTE OIL
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 57
1519
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 13126
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000004
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 550
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: OIL
STG: WASTE
Content: WASTE OIL
Number Of Tanks: 1
CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Region: CORTESE
Envirostor Id: Not Reported
Global ID: T0601300264
Site/Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
Status Date: Not Reported
Site Code: Not Reported
Latitude: Not Reported
Longitude: Not Reported
Owner: Not Reported
Enf Type: Not Reported
Swat R: Not Reported
Flag: active
Order No: Not Reported
Waste Discharge System No: Not Reported
Effective Date: Not Reported
Region 2: Not Reported
WID Id: Not Reported
Solid Waste Id No: Not Reported
Waste Management Uit Name: Not Reported
File Name: Active Open
ENF: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 58
1520
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: 2
Facility Id: 260941
Agency Name: Shell Oil Company - Concord
Place Type: Facility
Place Subtype: Not Reported
Facility Type: All other facilities
Agency Type: Privately-Owned Business
# Of Agencies: 1
Place Latitude: Not Reported
Place Longitude: Not Reported
SIC Code 1: Not Reported
SIC Desc 1: Not Reported
SIC Code 2: Not Reported
SIC Desc 2: Not Reported
SIC Code 3: Not Reported
SIC Desc 3: Not Reported
NAICS Code 1: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 1: Not Reported
NAICS Code 2: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 2: Not Reported
NAICS Code 3: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 3: Not Reported
# Of Places: 1
Source Of Facility: Reg Meas
Design Flow: Not Reported
Threat To Water Quality: Not Reported
Complexity: Not Reported
Pretreatment: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 2: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 3: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 4: Not Reported
Program: UST
Program Category1: TANKS
Program Category2: TANKS
# Of Programs: 1
WDID: 2 07-0284
Reg Measure Id: 168570
Reg Measure Type: Unregulated
Region: 2
Order #: Not Reported
Npdes# CA#: Not Reported
Major-Minor: Not Reported
Npdes Type: Not Reported
Reclamation: Not Reported
Dredge Fill Fee: Not Reported
301H: Not Reported
Application Fee Amt Received: Not Reported
Status: Never Active

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 59
1521
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Status Date: 02/20/2013
Effective Date: Not Reported
Expiration/Review Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
WDR Review - Amend: Not Reported
WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not Reported
WDR Review - Rescind: Not Reported
WDR Review - No Action Required: Not Reported
WDR Review - Pending: Not Reported
WDR Review - Planned: Not Reported
Status Enrollee: N
Individual/General: I
Fee Code: Not Reported
Direction/Voice: Passive
Enforcement Id(EID): 239094
Region: 2
Order / Resolution Number: UNKNOWN
Enforcement Action Type: 13267 Letter
Effective Date: 12/18/2001
Adoption/Issuance Date: Not Reported
Achieve Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
ACL Issuance Date: Not Reported
EPL Issuance Date: Not Reported
Status: Active
Title: Enforcement - 2 07-0284
Description: Not Reported
Program: UST
Latest Milestone Completion Date: 3/28/2002
# Of Programs1: 1
Total Assessment Amount: 0
Initial Assessed Amount: 0
Liability $ Amount: 0
Project $ Amount: 0
Liability $ Paid: 0
Project $ Completed: 0
Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: 2
Facility Id: 260941
Agency Name: Shell Oil Company - Concord
Place Type: Facility
Place Subtype: Not Reported
Facility Type: All other facilities
Agency Type: Privately-Owned Business
# Of Agencies: 1
Place Latitude: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 60
1522
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Place Longitude: Not Reported
SIC Code 1: Not Reported
SIC Desc 1: Not Reported
SIC Code 2: Not Reported
SIC Desc 2: Not Reported
SIC Code 3: Not Reported
SIC Desc 3: Not Reported
NAICS Code 1: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 1: Not Reported
NAICS Code 2: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 2: Not Reported
NAICS Code 3: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 3: Not Reported
# Of Places: 1
Source Of Facility: Reg Meas
Design Flow: Not Reported
Threat To Water Quality: Not Reported
Complexity: Not Reported
Pretreatment: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 2: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 3: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 4: Not Reported
Program: UST
Program Category1: TANKS
Program Category2: TANKS
# Of Programs: 1
WDID: 2 07-0284
Reg Measure Id: 168570
Reg Measure Type: Unregulated
Region: 2
Order #: Not Reported
Npdes# CA#: Not Reported
Major-Minor: Not Reported
Npdes Type: Not Reported
Reclamation: Not Reported
Dredge Fill Fee: Not Reported
301H: Not Reported
Application Fee Amt Received: Not Reported
Status: Never Active
Status Date: 02/20/2013
Effective Date: Not Reported
Expiration/Review Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
WDR Review - Amend: Not Reported
WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not Reported
WDR Review - Rescind: Not Reported
WDR Review - No Action Required: Not Reported
WDR Review - Pending: Not Reported
WDR Review - Planned: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 61
1523
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Status Enrollee: N
Individual/General: I
Fee Code: Not Reported
Direction/Voice: Passive
Enforcement Id(EID): 238226
Region: 2
Order / Resolution Number: UNKNOWN
Enforcement Action Type: 13267 Letter
Effective Date: 07/21/2001
Adoption/Issuance Date: Not Reported
Achieve Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
ACL Issuance Date: Not Reported
EPL Issuance Date: Not Reported
Status: Historical
Title: Enforcement - 2 07-0284
Description: Not Reported
Program: UST
Latest Milestone Completion Date: 10/5/2001
# Of Programs1: 1
Total Assessment Amount: 0
Initial Assessed Amount: 0
Liability $ Amount: 0
Project $ Amount: 0
Liability $ Paid: 0
Project $ Completed: 0
Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: 2
Facility Id: 260941
Agency Name: Shell Oil Company - Concord
Place Type: Facility
Place Subtype: Not Reported
Facility Type: All other facilities
Agency Type: Privately-Owned Business
# Of Agencies: 1
Place Latitude: Not Reported
Place Longitude: Not Reported
SIC Code 1: Not Reported
SIC Desc 1: Not Reported
SIC Code 2: Not Reported
SIC Desc 2: Not Reported
SIC Code 3: Not Reported
SIC Desc 3: Not Reported
NAICS Code 1: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 1: Not Reported
NAICS Code 2: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 62
1524
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) NAICS Desc 2: Not Reported
NAICS Code 3: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 3: Not Reported
# Of Places: 1
Source Of Facility: Reg Meas
Design Flow: Not Reported
Threat To Water Quality: Not Reported
Complexity: Not Reported
Pretreatment: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 2: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 3: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 4: Not Reported
Program: UST
Program Category1: TANKS
Program Category2: TANKS
# Of Programs: 1
WDID: 2 07-0284
Reg Measure Id: 168570
Reg Measure Type: Unregulated
Region: 2
Order #: Not Reported
Npdes# CA#: Not Reported
Major-Minor: Not Reported
Npdes Type: Not Reported
Reclamation: Not Reported
Dredge Fill Fee: Not Reported
301H: Not Reported
Application Fee Amt Received: Not Reported
Status: Never Active
Status Date: 02/20/2013
Effective Date: Not Reported
Expiration/Review Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
WDR Review - Amend: Not Reported
WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not Reported
WDR Review - Rescind: Not Reported
WDR Review - No Action Required: Not Reported
WDR Review - Pending: Not Reported
WDR Review - Planned: Not Reported
Status Enrollee: N
Individual/General: I
Fee Code: Not Reported
Direction/Voice: Passive
Enforcement Id(EID): 236461
Region: 2
Order / Resolution Number: UNKNOWN
Enforcement Action Type: 13267 Letter
Effective Date: 02/21/2001
Adoption/Issuance Date: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 63
1525
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Achieve Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
ACL Issuance Date: Not Reported
EPL Issuance Date: Not Reported
Status: Historical
Title: Enforcement - 2 07-0284
Description: Not Reported
Program: UST
Latest Milestone Completion Date: 4/4/2001
# Of Programs1: 1
Total Assessment Amount: 0
Initial Assessed Amount: 0
Liability $ Amount: 0
Project $ Amount: 0
Liability $ Paid: 0
Project $ Completed: 0
Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0
HIST CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
edr_fname: SHELL
edr_fadd1: 2301 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: CORTESE
Facility County Code: 7
Reg By: LTNKA
Reg Id: 07-0284
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: JACKSON'S SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0031645
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HMBP GENERAL
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 713126
CERS ID: 10005817
Name: JACKSON'S SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0031645
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG GENERAL
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 713126
CERS ID: 10005817

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 64
1526
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Name: JACKSON'S SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0031645
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 713126
CERS ID: 10005817
CERS: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 213908
CERS ID: T0601300264
CERS Description: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Site Affiliation:

Affiliation Type Desc: Local Agency Caseworker
Entity Name: SUE LOYD - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.

Affiliation City: MARTINEZ
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Regional Board Caseworker
Entity Name: BARBARA SIEMINSKI - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 1515 CLAY STREET, SUITE 1400
Affiliation City: OAKLAND
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported

JACKSONS SHELL
2301 SAN PABLO AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1020983913
▲ B10
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (972 ft. / 0.184 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
EDR Exclusive Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 65
1527
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Records
Year: Name: / Type:
1969: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1970: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1971: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1972: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1973: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1974: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1975: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1976: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1977: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1978: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1979: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1980: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1982: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1983: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1985: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1986: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1987: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations
1988: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations
1989: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1990: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1991: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1992: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1993: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1994: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1995: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1996: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1997: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1998: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1999: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2006: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2007: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2008: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2009: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2010: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2011: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2012: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC

PUMP HOUSE
700 TENNENT AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 U003784209

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 66
1528
▲ B11
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1106 ft. / 0.21 mi.)
7 ft. Higher Elevation 29 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
UST: Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Facility ID: 07000758769
Permitting Agency: Contra Costa County Health Services Department CERSID: 10007872
Latitude: 38.005165
Longitude: -122.291008
SWEEPS UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 58769
Number: 2
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: 02-24-94
Action Date: 04-16-94
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: UNKNOWN
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000004
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 5500
Active Date: 02-24-94
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: PRM UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: 2
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 58769

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 67
1529
PUMP HOUSE, 700 TENNENT AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Number: 2
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: 02-24-94
Action Date: 04-16-94
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: UNKNOWN
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000005
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10500
Active Date: 02-24-94
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 58769
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000001
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 5000
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: WASTE
Content: UNLEADED PLU
Number Of Tanks: 3
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 58769
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000002
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 2000
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 68
1530
PUMP HOUSE, 700 TENNENT AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) STG: WASTE
Content: PRM UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 58769
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000003
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 6000
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: WASTE
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported

STACYS CHEVRON
700 TENMENT, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1020427720
▲ B12
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1106 ft. / 0.21 mi.)
7 ft. Higher Elevation 29 ft. Above Sea Level
EDR Exclusive Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Records
Year: Name: / Type:
1969: ROBERTS JOE CHEVRON SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1970: ROBERTS JOE CHEVRON SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1972: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1973: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1974: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1974: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 69
1531
STACYS CHEVRON, 700 TENMENT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) 1975: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1975: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1975: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1976: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1976: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1977: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1978: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1979: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1979: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1980: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1996: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
1997: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
1998: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
1999: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2000: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2001: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2002: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2003: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2004: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2005: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2006: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2007: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2008: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2009: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2010: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2011: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2013: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2014: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores

YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON)
700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 U001597882
▲ B13
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1106 ft. / 0.21 mi.)
7 ft. Higher Elevation 29 ft. Above Sea Level
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.

Conditions:

Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Crossgradient: YES
HIST UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON)
Address: 700 TENNENT AVENUE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 70
1532
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
File Number: 00022790
URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00022790.pdf Region: STATE
Facility ID: 00000058769
Facility Type: Gas Station
Other Type: Not Reported
Contact Name: JERRY BUTLER, MANAGER
Telephone: 4157246831
Owner Name: ALBERT L. TORRETTA
Owner Address: 784 TENNENT AVENUE
Owner City,St,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Total Tanks: 0003
Tank Num: 001
Container Num: #2
Year Installed: 1976
Tank Capacity: 00005000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: REGULAR
Container Construction Thickness: Not Reported
Leak Detection: Visual
Tank Num: 002
Container Num: #3
Year Installed: 1976
Tank Capacity: 00002000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: UNLEADED
Container Construction Thickness: Not Reported
Leak Detection: Visual
Tank Num: 003
Container Num: #1
Year Installed: 1976
Tank Capacity: 00006000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: UNLEADED
Container Construction Thickness: Not Reported
Leak Detection: Visual
Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: http://www.web.edrnet.com/ordering/switchboard/redirect.aspx?s=GRR_CA_HISTUST_PDF&img_id=000 22790
CERS TANKS: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 145350
CERS ID: 10007872
CERS Description: Underground Storage Tank

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 71
1533
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032449
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HMBP: >10K-100K LBS, 0-19 EMPLOYEES
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 758769
CERS ID: 10007872
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032449
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 758769
CERS ID: 10007872
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032449
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG GENERAL
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 758769
CERS ID: 10007872
CERS: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 145350
CERS ID: 10007872
CERS Description: Chemical Storage Facilities
Violations:

Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-05-2021
Citation: 23 CCR 16 2636(f)(4) - California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Chapter 16, Section(s) 2636(f)(4)

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 72
1534
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Violation Description: Failure to meet one or more of the following monitoring requirements in lieu of the requirement to be tightness tested every 12 months: The monitoring system maintains all product piping outside the dispenser to be fail-safe and shut down the pump when a leak is detected. The monitoring system shuts down the pump or stops flow when a leak is detected in the under dispenser containment (UDC).

Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/05/2021. OBSERVATION: Owner/Operator, in lieu of annual tightness testing, failed to maintain all product piping, outside the dispenser, to be fail-safe and capable of shutting down the pump when a leak is detected and a monitoring system capable of shutting down the pump or stops the flow when a leak is detected in the under dispenser containment. During the facility's annual monitoring system certification none of the UDC's Bravo float and chain systems were able to shut off the flow to a dispenser when challenge tested with liquid. CORRECTIVE ACTION: The facility is required to maintain all product piping outside the dispenser to be fail-safe and shut down the pump when a leak is detected and the monitoring system shuts down the pump or stops the flow (flow restriction) when a leak is detected in the under dispenser containment. Technicians were able to repair/resolve all faulty float and chain shut off devices during the annual monitoring system certification, no further action [Truncated] Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-09-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/29/2016.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-19-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/29/2016.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-17-2018
Citation: HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) 25505(a)(4) Violation Description: Failure to provide initial and annual training to all employees in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material or failure to document and maintain training records for a minimum of three years.

Violation Notes: OBSERVATION: The business failed to provide initial and annual training to all employees in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material including familiarity with the emergency response plan or failure to document and maintain training records for a minimum of three years. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Establish and electronically submit an employee training program containing provisions to ensure initial and annual training for all employees in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material and document and maintain training records for a minimum of three years.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-17-2018

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 73
1535
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Citation: HSC 6.95 25505(c) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) 25505(c) Violation Description: Failure to have a business plan readily available to personnel of the business or the unified program facility with responsibilities for emergency response or training.

Violation Notes: OBSERVATION: The business failed to have the hazardous material business plan readily available to personnel of the business or the unified program facility with responsibilities for emergency response or training. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Provide a readily available business plan to personnel of the business or the unified program facility with responsibilities for emergency response or training. Document that appropriate personnel have the business plan readily availible.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 06-05-2015
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Training - For use of Local Ordinance only.

Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/15/2015.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 06-24-2014
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 07/09/2014.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-01-2013
Citation: HSC 6.7 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.7, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Description: UST Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/20/2014.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-19-2016
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Operations/Maintenance - For use of Local Ordinance only.

Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/19/2016.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 74
1536
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Violation Date: 05-01-2015
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Administration/Documentation - For use of Local Ordinance only Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/08/2015.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-17-2018
Citation: HSC 6.7 25291(b) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.7, Section(s) 25291(b) Violation Description: Failure of the UST system to be designed and constructed with a monitoring system capable of detecting the entry of the hazardous substance into the secondary containment.

Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/17/2018. OBSERVATION: Owner/Operator failed to design or construct a UST system with a monitoring system capable of detecting the entry of the hazardous substance into the secondary containment. Secondary containment did not detect a liquid at any of the UDC's.

CORRECTIVE ACTION: None, repaired and corrected on site.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-09-2016
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Administration/Documentation - For use of Local Ordinance only Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/11/2016.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 06-05-2015
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Operations/Maintenance - For use of Local Ordinance only.

Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/15/2015.

Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Evaluation:

Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-05-2021
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 75
1537
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Date: 05-06-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-19-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 06-09-2017
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 06-24-2014
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 09-08-2020
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-05-2021
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 76
1538
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-09-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-09-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-19-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-20-2014
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-22-2017
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-17-2018
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 77
1539
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-20-2014
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 06-05-2015
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 08-06-2018
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-01-2013
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-01-2015
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-06-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 78
1540
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-17-2018
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 06-15-2015
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Enforcement Action:

Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-01-2013
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-01-2015
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 79
1541
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-05-2021
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-09-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-09-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-17-2018
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 80
1542
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-17-2018
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-19-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-19-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-05-2015
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 81
1543
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-24-2014
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Coordinates:

Site ID: 145350
Facility Name: PUMP HOUSE
Env Int Type Code: HMBP
Program ID: 10007872
Coord Name: Not Reported
Ref Point Type Desc: Unknown
Latitude: 38.005161
Longitude: -122.290993
Affiliation:

Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564-1722
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Operator
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: PUMP HOUSE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 82
1544
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Type Desc: UST Permit Applicant
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Operator
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: UST Property Owner Name
Entity Name: Bill Mcdaniel
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (707) 847-3909
Affiliation Type Desc: UST Tank Operator
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: UST Tank Owner
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 9549
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 83
1545
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: PUMP HOUSE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-6831
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: Property Owner
Entity Name: Bill Mcdaniel
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (707) 847-3909

R R & H PAVING & GRADING
440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000100410

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 84
1546
▲ 14
WSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1118 ft. / 0.212 mi.)
64 ft. Higher Elevation 86 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:

Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.

Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.

The source is down-gradient and beyond the critical distance.

Conditions:

Chemicals of Concern: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:

Downgradient: YES
RCRA-SQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19960901
Handler Name: R R & H PAVING & GRADING
Handler Address: 440 BUENA VISTA
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAD096230180
Contact Name: Not Reported
Contact Address: Not Reported
Contact City,State,Zip: Not Reported
Contact Telephone: Not Reported
Contact Fax: Not Reported
Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Not Reported
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: CA
State District: 2
Mailing Address: BUENA VISTA
Mailing City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Owner Name: HARCOURT ROBERT L
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Operator Type: Private
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:

No

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 85
1547
R R & H PAVING & GRADING, 440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:

No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:

Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:

NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:

Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:

No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:

No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:

No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:

No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:

No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:

No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20000915

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 86
1548
R R & H PAVING & GRADING, 440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:

No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Handler - Owner Operator:

Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: HARCOURT ROBERT L
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:

Receive Date: 19960901
Handler Name: R R & H PAVING & GRADING
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: CA
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:

No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 87
1549
R R & H PAVING & GRADING, 440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:

Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
FINDS: Other Ascertainable Records
Registry ID: 110002665072
Click Here: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110002665072 Environmental Interest/Information System:

RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA.

The Click here to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. database contains http://www.edrnet.com/srf2/FinalSiteReport.aspx?ID=48i4g58DHiW320.g7g5rn9eLDgUHlM37HWfh3gv7OX0I..G.5MN7fJgOP3UbruVnMWBuuen kLJ293AgVVUQKBbRlRsMYz4Mg8LliHA29Sgci5hC8WHDDuHTc3miWIJ3Cz4Gi0ee.JS4aA7yCgy7BCzrYinEO4vueqsLrp3UBgBOU4f4FS8JFio H3NRgmF5sx2YtDScHgr8FMW.B3pjAXA08R.T42Fc7JYg945wCrDbn9S2N6egeLD35IygUAUGF9dul2IMji1TP7NeHAr4u7fjuhdjuotgG5vqh4wj8g 6iHh3Hygjw5o52VdDKnHHm3DKWcf3mA2jb0z6.lg2vT7KigIA2xXr6tnnR3Ojeh5LZG2WXgSOUMi2.pll9MW.69w7baHl23gZfKghZj2DYgNPv5k2 additional records for this site. Please contact your EDR Account Executive for more information.

ECHO: Other Ascertainable Records
Envid: 1000100410
Registry ID: 110002665072
DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002665072 Name: R R & H PAVING & GRADING
Address: 440 BUENA VISTA
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: RR & H PAVING & GRADING
Address: 440 BUENA VISTA DR
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032957
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG: LESS THAN 5 TONS/YEAR
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 770432
CERS ID: 10009396

MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 88
1550

ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site listUS NPL National Priority List EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens EPA 10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994Federal CERCLIS listUS SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities listUS CORRACTS Corrective Action Report EPA 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021Federal RCRA TSD facilities listUS RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021Federal RCRA generators listUS RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021US RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionall Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registriesUS LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 07/12/2021 08/06/2021 10/22/2021US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 08/23/2021 08/23/2021 11/12/2021US US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 08/23/2021 08/23/2021 11/12/2021Federal ERNS listUS ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 09/13/2021 09/21/2021 12/15/2021State and tribal - equivalent NPLCA RESPONSE State Response Sites Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021State and tribal - equivalent CERCLISCA ENVIROSTOR EnviroStor Database Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021State and tribal landfill / solid waste disposalCA SWF/LF (SWIS) Solid Waste Information System Department of Resources Recycling and Recover 08/09/2021 08/10/2021 11/05/2021State and tribal leaking storage tank listsCA LUST Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA LUST REG 5 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 07/01/2008 07/22/2008 07/31/2008CA LUST REG 6L Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/09/2003 09/10/2003 10/07/2003CA LUST REG 6V Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 06/07/2005 06/07/2005 06/29/2005CA LUST REG 1 Active Toxic Site Investigation California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/01/2001 02/28/2001 03/29/2001CA LUST REG 2 Fuel Leak List California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA LUST REG 3 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/19/2003 05/19/2003 06/02/2003 TC6803037.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1551
CA LUST REG 4 Underground Storage Tank Leak List California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004 CA LUST REG 7 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/26/2004 02/26/2004 03/24/2004CA LUST REG 8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/14/2005 02/15/2005 03/28/2005CA LUST REG 9 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 03/01/2001 04/23/2001 05/21/2001US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/28/2021 06/22/2021 09/20/2021US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 04/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 06/01/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1 04/28/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 05/17/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 5 04/06/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021CA CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA SLIC REG 1 Active Toxic Site Investigations California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 04/25/2003CA SLIC REG 2 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board San Fran 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA SLIC REG 3 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/18/2006 05/18/2006 06/15/2006CA SLIC REG 4 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angele 11/17/2004 11/18/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 5 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board Central 04/01/2005 04/05/2005 04/21/2005CA SLIC REG 6V Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorv 05/24/2005 05/25/2005 06/16/2005CA SLIC REG 6L SLIC Sites California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004CA SLIC REG 7 SLIC List California Regional Quality Control Board, Co 11/24/2004 11/29/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 8 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Region Water Quality Control Board 04/03/2008 04/03/2008 04/14/2008CA SLIC REG 9 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/10/2007 09/11/2007 09/28/2007State and tribal registered storage tank listsCA UST Active UST Facilities SWRCB 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/30/2021CA MILITARY UST SITES Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA UST CLOSURE Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases State Water Resources Control Board 08/18/2021 09/08/2021 12/03/2021CA AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities California Environmental Protection Agency 07/06/2016 07/12/2016 09/19/2016US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 9 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 05/17/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 5 04/06/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 04/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 1 04/28/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/28/2021 06/22/2021 09/20/2021US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 06/01/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA 01/29/2021 02/17/2021 03/22/2021State and tribal voluntary cleanup sitesUS INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng EPA, Region 7 03/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008US INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EPA, Region 1 07/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016CA VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021 TC6803037.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1552
State and tribal Brownfields sites
CA BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing State Water Resources Control Board 09/20/2021 09/21/2021 12/08/2021Other RecordsUS CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 06/30/2021 07/14/2021 07/16/2021US ROD Records Of Decision EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Environmental Protection Agency 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021CA HIST CAL-SITES Calsites Database Department of Toxic Substance Control 08/08/2005 08/03/2006 08/24/2006US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 9 01/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009CA SWRCY Recycler Database Department of Conservation 09/07/2021 09/08/2021 11/29/2021CA CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database California Environmental Protection Agency 10/31/1994 09/05/1995 09/29/1995CA HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database State Water Resources Control Board 10/15/1990 01/25/1991 02/12/1991CA SAN FRANCISCO AST Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing San Francisco County Department of Public Hea 08/05/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing State Water Resources Control Board 06/01/1994 07/07/2005 08/11/2005US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 09/28/2021US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 07/26/2021 07/27/2021 10/22/2021US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 05/18/2021 05/18/2021 08/03/2021US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter Sites Environmental Protection Agency 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter Sites American Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 09/30/2017 05/08/2018 07/20/2018US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2019 12/01/2020 02/09/2021US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2019 11/06/2019 02/10/2020US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 01/12/2017 03/05/2019 11/11/2019US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2017 02/03/2017 04/07/2017US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST Environmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System Data EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 09/12/2021 09/13/2021 09/28/2021US DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 01/02/2020 01/28/2020 04/17/2020US US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Drug Enforcement Administration 05/18/2021 05/18/2021 08/03/2021US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Environmental Protection Agency 06/10/2021 06/10/2021 08/17/2021US DOD Department of Defense Sites USGS 12/31/2005 11/10/2006 01/11/2007US FEDLAND Federal and Indian Lands U.S. Geological Survey 04/02/2018 04/11/2018 11/06/2019US FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 08/10/2021 08/17/2021 10/22/2021US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Department of Energy 08/30/2019 11/15/2019 01/28/2020US ODI Open Dump Inventory Environmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004US US MINES Mines Master Index File Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 08/09/2021 08/24/2021 11/19/2021US MINES VIOLATIONS MSHA Violation Assessment Data DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi 06/30/2021 07/01/2021 09/28/2021US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS 05/06/2020 05/27/2020 08/13/2020US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS 04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011US PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 12/15/2021US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA 12/31/2018 08/14/2020 11/04/2020US TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act EPA 12/31/2016 06/17/2020 09/10/2020 TC6803037.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1553
US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009 US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems EPA 07/19/2021 07/19/2021 10/12/2021US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017US PADS PCB Activity Database System EPA 11/19/2020 01/08/2021 03/22/2021US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 07/29/2021 08/24/2021 11/19/2021US RADINFO Radiation Information Database Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2019 07/01/2019 09/23/2019US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA 05/05/2021 05/18/2021 08/17/2021US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA 04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RMP Risk Management Plans Environmental Protection Agency 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/12/2021US BRS Biennial Reporting System EPA/NTIS 12/31/2019 09/15/2021 12/14/2021US PWS Public Water System Data EPA 12/17/2013 01/09/2014 10/15/2014US INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations USGS 12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines Department of Interior 09/14/2021 09/15/2021 12/15/2021CA CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services 01/01/1989 07/27/1994 08/02/1994CA CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Department of Toxic Substances Control 12/31/2019 01/20/2021 04/08/2021CA CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Office of Emergency Services 06/30/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CORTESE "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information 09/20/2021 09/21/2021 12/08/2021CA CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON CUPA Facility Listing Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department 05/01/2019 05/14/2019 07/17/2019CA DEED Deed Restriction Listing DTSC and SWRCB 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities Department of Toxic Substance Control 08/27/2021 09/01/2021 11/19/2021CA DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listi South Coast Air Quality Management District 08/18/2021 08/23/2021 11/12/2021CA DRYCLEAN AVAQMD Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner L Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Distri 08/24/2021 08/25/2021 11/17/2021CA EMI Emissions Inventory Data California Air Resources Board 12/31/2019 06/10/2021 08/27/2021CA ENF Enforcement Action Listing State Water Resoruces Control Board 04/16/2021 04/20/2021 07/07/2021CA Financial Assurance 1 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/14/2021 04/15/2021 07/06/2021CA Financial Assurance 2 Financial Assurance Information Listing California Integrated Waste Management Board 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 11/05/2021CA HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing Integrated Waste Management Board 09/14/2021 11/11/2021 11/23/2021CA HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/01/2001 01/22/2009 04/08/2009CA HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 11/08/2021CA HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database Department of Toxic Substances Control 10/04/2021 10/05/2021 12/22/2021CA ICE ICE Department of Toxic Subsances Control 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 11/08/2021CA LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Qualilty Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA LIENS Environmental Liens Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 08/25/2021 09/03/2021 11/22/2021CA MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA MINES Mines Site Location Listing Department of Conservation 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing Department of Public Health 08/05/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA NPDES NPDES Permits Listing State Water Resources Control Board 05/10/2021 05/11/2021 07/27/2021CA PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing Department of Pesticide Regulation 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA PROC Certified Processors Database Department of Conservation 06/04/2021 06/04/2021 08/27/2021CA NOTIFY 65 Proposition 65 Records State Water Resources Control Board 03/12/2021 03/16/2021 06/01/2021CA SCH School Property Evaluation Program Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021CA SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch FirstSearch 06/06/2012 01/03/2013 02/22/2013 TC6803037.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1554
CA TOXIC PITS Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites State Water Resources Control Board 07/01/1995 08/30/1995 09/26/1995 CA UIC UIC Listing Deaprtment of Conservation 06/03/2021 06/03/2021 08/25/2021CA WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing RWQCB, Central Valley Region 02/11/2021 07/01/2021 09/29/2021CA WDS Waste Discharge System State Water Resources Control Board 06/19/2007 06/20/2007 06/29/2007CA WIP Well Investigation Program Case List Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board 07/03/2009 07/21/2009 08/03/2009CA WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database State Water Resources Control Board 04/01/2000 04/10/2000 05/10/2000CA WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA PROD WATER PONDS Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA OTHER OIL GAS Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA NON-CASE INFO Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA UIC GEO Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resource Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA CERS CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data California Environmental Protection Agency 07/15/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 10/22/2021CA WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/08/2021 12/01/2021CA SAMPLING POINT Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA PROJECT Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/06/2021 05/21/2021 08/11/2021CA CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System State Water Resources Control Board 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/08/2021 12/01/2021US FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/25/2021 06/24/2021 09/20/2021US MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System USGS 04/06/2018 10/21/2019 10/24/2019US UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites Department of Defense 12/31/2018 07/02/2020 09/17/2020CA HWTS Hazardous Waste Tracking System Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/13/2021 07/14/2021 10/06/2021CA CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks California Environmental Protection Agency 07/15/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE CalEPA 07/15/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing State Water Resources Control Board 12/01/2019 08/19/2021 10/28/2021CA MILITARY PRIV SITES Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 06/26/2021 07/01/2021 09/28/2021HISTORICAL USE RECORDSUS EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR, Inc.CA RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Resources Recycling and Recover 07/01/2013 01/13/2014CA RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan State Water Resources Control Board 07/01/2013 12/30/2013 TC6803037.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1555

COUNTY RECORDS
CA CS ALAMEDA Contaminated Sites Alameda County Environmental Health Services 01/09/2019 01/11/2019 03/05/2019CA UST ALAMEDA Underground Tanks Alameda County Environmental Health Services 09/30/2021 10/01/2021 12/15/2021CA CUPA AMADOR CUPA Facility List Amador County Environmental Health 08/05/2021 08/06/2021 09/17/2021CA CUPA BUTTE CUPA Facility Listing Public Health Department 04/21/2017 04/25/2017 08/09/2017CA CUPA CALVERAS CUPA Facility Listing Calveras County Environmental Health 09/15/2021 09/16/2021 12/09/2021CA CUPA COLUSA CUPA Facility List Health & Human Services 04/06/2020 04/23/2020 07/10/2020CA SL CONTRA COSTA Site List Contra Costa Health Services Department 07/20/2021 07/20/2021 10/11/2021CA CUPA DEL NORTE CUPA Facility List Del Norte County Environmental Health Divisio 06/29/2021 07/23/2021 10/08/2021CA CUPA EL DORADO CUPA Facility List El Dorado County Environmental Management Dep 07/30/2021 08/03/2021 10/26/2021CA CUPA FRESNO CUPA Resources List Dept. of Community Health 04/09/2021 06/23/2021 09/17/2021CA CUPA GLENN CUPA Facility List Glenn County Air Pollution Control District 01/22/2018 01/24/2018 03/14/2018CA CUPA HUMBOLDT CUPA Facility List Humboldt County Environmental Health 08/12/2021 08/12/2021 11/08/2021CA CUPA IMPERIAL CUPA Facility List San Diego Border Field Office 07/13/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CUPA INYO CUPA Facility List Inyo County Environmental Health Services 04/02/2018 04/03/2018 06/14/2018CA CUPA KERN CUPA Facility List Kern County Public Health 07/06/2021 08/12/2021 10/07/2021CA UST KERN Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Environment Health Services Depar 07/06/2021 08/12/2021 08/18/2021CA CUPA KINGS CUPA Facility List Kings County Department of Public Health 12/03/2020 01/26/2021 04/14/2021CA CUPA LAKE CUPA Facility List Lake County Environmental Health 07/27/2021 07/28/2021 10/21/2021CA CUPA LASSEN CUPA Facility List Lassen County Environmental Health 07/31/2020 08/21/2020 11/09/2020CA AOCONCERN Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County 03/30/2009 03/31/2009 10/23/2009CA HMS LOS ANGELES HMS: Street Number List Department of Public Works 07/08/2021 07/09/2021 09/29/2021CA LF LOS ANGELES List of Solid Waste Facilities La County Department of Public Works 07/09/2021 07/09/2021 09/29/2021CA LF LOS ANGELES CITY City of Los Angeles Landfills Engineering & Construction Division 01/01/2021 02/18/2021 05/10/2021CA LOS ANGELES AST Active & Inactive AST Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 06/01/2019 06/25/2019 08/22/2019CA LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE Methane Producing Landfills Los Angeles County Department of Public Works 02/04/2021 04/16/2021 04/21/2021CA LOS ANGELES HM Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 04/19/2021 06/17/2021 06/28/2021CA LOS ANGELES UST Active & Inactive UST Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 04/19/2021 06/17/2021 09/14/2021CA SITE MIT LOS ANGELES Site Mitigation List Community Health Services 05/26/2021 07/09/2021 09/29/2021CA UST EL SEGUNDO City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank City of El Segundo Fire Department 01/21/2017 04/19/2017 05/10/2017CA UST LONG BEACH City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank City of Long Beach Fire Department 04/22/2019 04/23/2019 06/27/2019CA UST TORRANCE City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank City of Torrance Fire Department 02/02/2021 04/28/2021 07/13/2021CA CUPA MADERA CUPA Facility List Madera County Environmental Health 08/10/2020 08/12/2020 10/23/2020CA UST MARIN Underground Storage Tank Sites Public Works Department Waste Management 09/26/2018 10/04/2018 11/02/2018CA UST MENDOCINO Mendocino County UST Database Department of Public Health 09/22/2021 11/18/2021 11/22/2021CA CUPA MERCED CUPA Facility List Merced County Environmental Health 08/11/2021 08/12/2021 11/08/2021CA CUPA MONO CUPA Facility List Mono County Health Department 02/22/2021 03/02/2021 05/19/2021CA CUPA MONTEREY CUPA Facility Listing Monterey County Health Department 06/23/2021 06/23/2021 06/24/2021CA LUST NAPA Sites With Reported Contamination Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 01/09/2017 01/11/2017 03/02/2017CA UST NAPA Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 09/05/2019 09/09/2019 10/31/2019CA CUPA NEVADA CUPA Facility List Community Development Agency 07/28/2021 07/28/2021 10/21/2021CA IND_SITE ORANGE List of Industrial Site Cleanups Health Care Agency 07/09/2021 08/03/2021 10/26/2021CA LUST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Health Care Agency 07/09/2021 08/03/2021 10/26/2021CA UST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Health Care Agency 07/09/2021 07/29/2021 10/19/2021CA MS PLACER Master List of Facilities Placer County Health and Human Services 09/07/2021 09/09/2021 11/29/2021CA CUPA PLUMAS CUPA Facility List Plumas County Environmental Health 03/31/2019 04/23/2019 06/26/2019 TC6803037.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1556
CA LUST RIVERSIDE Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Department of Environmental Health 09/29/2021 09/30/2021 12/14/2021 CA UST RIVERSIDE Underground Storage Tank Tank List Department of Environmental Health 09/29/2021 09/30/2021 12/15/2021CA CS SACRAMENTO Toxic Site Clean-Up List Sacramento County Environmental Management 06/18/2021 09/28/2021 12/14/2021CA ML SACRAMENTO Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Sacramento County Environmental Management 08/02/2021 08/04/2021 11/02/2021CA CUPA SAN BENITO CUPA Facility List San Benito County Environmental Health 07/27/2021 07/28/2021 10/21/2021CA PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO Hazardous Material Permits San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardo 08/11/2021 08/12/2021 11/08/2021CA HMMD SAN DIEGO Hazardous Materials Management Division Database Hazardous Materials Management Division 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA LF SAN DIEGO Solid Waste Facilities Department of Health Services 10/01/2020 11/23/2020 02/08/2021CA SAN DIEGO CO LOP Local Oversight Program Listing Department of Environmental Health 07/14/2020 07/16/2020 09/29/2020CA SAN DIEGO CO SAM Environmental Case Listing San Diego County Department of Environmental 03/23/2010 06/15/2010 07/09/2010CA CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO CUPA Facility Listing San Francisco County Department of Environmen 08/05/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA LUST SAN FRANCISCO Local Oversite Facilities Department Of Public Health San Francisco Cou 09/19/2008 09/19/2008 09/29/2008CA UST SAN FRANCISCO Underground Storage Tank Information Department of Public Health 08/05/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA UST SAN JOAQUIN San Joaquin Co. UST Environmental Health Department 06/22/2018 06/26/2018 07/11/2018CA CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO CUPA Facility List San Luis Obispo County Public Health Departme 08/10/2021 08/11/2021 11/08/2021CA BI SAN MATEO Business Inventory San Mateo County Environmental Health Service 02/20/2020 02/20/2020 04/24/2020CA LUST SAN MATEO Fuel Leak List San Mateo County Environmental Health Service 03/29/2019 03/29/2019 05/29/2019CA CUPA SANTA BARBARA CUPA Facility Listing Santa Barbara County Public Health Department 09/08/2011 09/09/2011 10/07/2011CA CUPA SANTA CLARA Cupa Facility List Department of Environmental Health 08/04/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA HIST LUST SANTA CLARA HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report Santa Clara Valley Water District 03/29/2005 03/30/2005 04/21/2005CA LUST SANTA CLARA LOP Listing Department of Environmental Health 03/03/2014 03/05/2014 03/18/2014CA SAN JOSE HAZMAT Hazardous Material Facilities City of San Jose Fire Department 11/03/2020 11/05/2020 01/26/2021CA CUPA SANTA CRUZ CUPA Facility List Santa Cruz County Environmental Health 01/21/2017 02/22/2017 05/23/2017CA CUPA SHASTA CUPA Facility List Shasta County Department of Resource Manageme 06/15/2017 06/19/2017 08/09/2017CA LUST SOLANO Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Solano County Department of Environmental Man 06/04/2019 06/06/2019 08/13/2019CA UST SOLANO Underground Storage Tanks Solano County Department of Environmental Man 09/15/2021 09/16/2021 12/09/2021CA CUPA SONOMA Cupa Facility List County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services De 07/02/2021 07/06/2021 07/14/2021CA LUST SONOMA Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Department of Health Services 06/30/2021 06/30/2021 09/24/2021CA CUPA STANISLAUS CUPA Facility List Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmenta 05/14/2021 05/17/2021 08/03/2021CA UST SUTTER Underground Storage Tanks Sutter County Environmental Health Services 08/23/2021 08/25/2021 11/17/2021CA CUPA TEHAMA CUPA Facility List Tehama County Department of Environmental Hea 01/13/2021 01/14/2021 04/06/2021CA CUPA TRINITY CUPA Facility List Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/14/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CUPA TULARE CUPA Facility List Tulare County Environmental Health Services D 04/26/2021 04/28/2021 07/13/2021CA CUPA TUOLUMNE CUPA Facility List Divison of Environmental Health 04/23/2018 04/25/2018 06/25/2018CA BWT VENTURA Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Unde Ventura County Environmental Health Division 05/26/2021 07/19/2021 10/08/2021CA LF VENTURA Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Environmental Health Division 12/01/2011 12/01/2011 01/19/2012CA LUST VENTURA Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Environmental Health Division 05/29/2008 06/24/2008 07/31/2008CA MED WASTE VENTURA Medical Waste Program List Ventura County Resource Management Agency 05/26/2021 07/19/2021 10/07/2021CA UST VENTURA Underground Tank Closed Sites List Environmental Health Division 07/26/2021 09/08/2021 11/29/2021CA UST YOLO Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Yolo County Department of Health 09/23/2021 09/28/2021 12/15/2021CA CUPA YUBA CUPA Facility List Yuba County Environmental Health Department 07/20/2021 07/20/2021 10/08/2021 TC6803037.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1557

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC6803037.2s Page GR−8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date 1558
Appendix F: User Questionnaire
1559

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

USER QUESTIONNAIRE

Page 1 of 5 ends

Site/Project Name: Skelly
Location: 215 Skelly
In Order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs)1 offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”),2 the user must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete. Please explain your answers if appropriate.

1. Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site (40 CFR 312.25).

Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law?

Yes _____ No __X___

2. Activity and land use limitations (AULs) that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in a registry (40 CFR 312.26).

Are you aware of AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law? Yes _____ No __X___

3. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28).

As the user of this Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business?
1 Landowner Liability Protections, or LLPs, is the term used to describe the three types of potential defenses to Superfund liability in EPA’s Interim Guidance Regarding Criteria Landowners Must Meet in Order to Qualify for Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser, Contiguous Property Owner, or Innocent Landowner Limitations on CERCLA Liability (“Common Elements” Guide) issued on March 6, 2003.
2 P.L. 107-118.
1560

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

USER QUESTIONNAIRE

Page 2 of 5 ends

Yes _____ No __X___

4. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29).

Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property?
Yes __X___ No _____
If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property?
Yes _____ No _____ NA _X____

5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30).

Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? Yes __X___ No _____
For example, as user,
(a) Do you know the past uses of the property? Yes __X___ No _____ (b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? Yes _____ No __X___
(c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? Yes _____ No __X___
(d) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? Yes _____ No __X___
1561

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

USER QUESTIONNAIRE

Page 3 of 5 ends

6. The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation (40 CFR 312.31).

As the user of the ESA based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property?
Yes _____ No __X___
To enable Brown and Caldwell to complete your project, please also respond to the following items.
(a) The reason why the Phase I is required:

DR Horton is preparing develop the property for single-family housing. (b) The type of property (e.g., industrial, commercial, vacant, agricultural, residential, etc.) and type of property transaction, for example, sale, purchase, exchange, etc.:

Vacant Residential (with horse keeping)
(c) The complete and correct address for the property, including county (a map or other documentation showing property location and boundaries is helpful):
215 Skelly, Hercules, CA (ATLA survey provided via email) (d) The scope of services desired for the Phase I (including whether any parties to the property transaction may have a required standard scope of services or whether any considerations beyond the requirements of Practice E 1527 are to be considered):

Standard scope of services
(e) Identification of all parties who will rely on the Phase I report:

DR Horton & City of Hercules (public document to be evaluated and made available as part of the project’s CEQA review
(f) Identification of the site contact and how the contact can be reached:

Roberta Mori – 916-256-0557
1562

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

USER QUESTIONNAIRE

Page 4 of 5 ends

(g) Any special terms and conditions which must be agreed upon by the environmental professional:

No
(h) Any other knowledge or experience with the property that may be pertinent to the environmental professional (for example, copies of any available prior environmental site assessment reports, documents, correspondence, etc., concerning the property and its environmental conditions. These include, but are not necessarily limited to:
- ESA reports,
- Environment compliance audit reports,
- Environmental permits (for example, solid waste disposal permits, hazardous waste disposal permits, wastewater permits, NPDES permits, underground injection permits),
- Registrations for underground and above-ground storage tanks, - Registrations for underground injection systems,
- Material safety data sheets,
- Community right-to-know plan,
- Safety plans; preparedness and prevention plans; spill prevention, countermeasure, and control plans; etc.,
- Reports regarding hydrogeologic conditions on the property or surrounding area,
- Notices or other correspondence from any government agency relating to past or current violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or relating to environmental liens encumbering the property,
- Hazardous waste generator notices or reports,
- Geotechnical studies,
- Risk assessments, and
- Recorded AULs.

No
(i) Proceedings Involving the Property – whether the User knows of:
(a) Any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; Yes _____ No __X___
1563

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

USER QUESTIONNAIRE

Page 5 of 5 ends

(b) Any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property;
Yes _____ No __X___
(c) Any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products;
Yes _____ No __X___
Please explain any “Yes” answers below.

Completed by:

Signature
Printed Name Adam Foster
Organization DR Horton
Date 12/16/2021

Please return this questionnaire to:

Brian Sefcik
[email protected]
Brown and Caldwell
Fax – 615-256-8332
Phone – 615-238-2073

1564
Appendix G: Qualifications of Environmental
Professionals
1565
Staff Geologist/Hydrogeologist Kaitlin Tanel, GIT
1 Tanel, Kaitlin [9/11/2019)
Experience Summary
Ms. Tanel is a geologist/hydrogeologist at BC’s Davis office in the Site Investigation & Remediation - Solid Waste service line, providing support for both municipal and private sector clients. She has prepared technical workplans and implementation reports in addition to performing environmental sampling, soil logging, and XRF analysis.

Environmental Services
Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring and Reporting, Rasmussen Valley Mines, Caribou County, Idaho
Field Geologist/Hydrogeologist. Kaitlin uses various techniques to collect groundwater samples, maintain field forms, and provide quality assurance and field data entry. She participated in field activities and maintains and calibrates field equipment.

Folsom Corporation Yard, City of Folsom, California
Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. To support site closure of the City’s former landfill, BC is providing ongoing water quality monitoring. Kaitlin is assisting in the field sampling program and in creation of bi-annual water quality analysis and quarterly water level monitoring reports.

Site Remediation, Confidential Client, Sacramento, California Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. The purpose of this project is currently to investigate the source of chlorinated VOCs at site formerly used as an industrial laundry and an adjacent carton manufacturing facility. Work in this project included VOC source investigation and exposure pathway/risk evaluation. Kaitlin provides technical support for the project.

Waste Investigation, Confidential Client, Sacramento, California Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. BC is currently providing technical assistance for a historical illegal landfill site. The landfill materials were discovered during earthwork activities in preparation of the client building a new electrical substation. Kaitlin was a CQA personnel for the project and collected soil confirmation samples, oversaw stockpile management, and continued monitoring using the landfill gas monitoring network.

Waste Handling/Capping Consulting, Confidential Client, Sacramento, California
Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. BC is providing technical expertise regarding waste handling and/or capping for historic landfill on property where client operates a substation. Kaitlin provides field support for the project. Currently BC is in negotiation with the Local Enforcement Agency to collect delay providing a closure/post closure maintenance plan for a proposed landfill cap. The current substation is scheduled to be decommissioned in approximately four years, and BC is supporting the clients’ efforts to mitigate any interim risks (landfill gas, groundwater) until the substation is decommissioned and the underlying landfill can be capped.

BC is preparing the interim action plan that is intended to bridge the four-year gap. Kaitlin provides continued monitoring using the landfill gas monitoring network.

Assignment
Staff Geologist/Hydrogeologist
Education
B.S., Geology, University of the
Pacific, Stockton, 2016
Registration
Geologist in Training, California,
2017
Training
40-hour HAZWOPER
8-hour Refresher
HAZWOPER Supervisor
24-hour MSHA
H2S competence
First Aid

CPR/AED
SmithSystem Defensive Driving

PASSPORT
Experience
3 years
Joined Firm
2018
Relevant Expertise
• Environmental sampling
• Soil logging
• Geologic mapping
• XRF analysis
• Construction quality assurance
1566
Kaitlin Tanel, GIT.
2 Tanel, Kaitlin [9/11/2019)
Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Confidential Client, Vallecitos, California Site Safety Officer. BC is assisting the client fulfill the provision of a Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) permit issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. The work will include developing a groundwater monitoring plan and re-engineering the site’s wastewater treatment system to meet nitrate limits. Kaitlin acted as a Site Safety Officer.

Site Investigation and Remedial Activities, Confidential Client, Kern County, California Junior Scientist. The purpose of this project was to investigate and remediate soil contamination related to oil well drilling and pumping. Kaitlin provided technical assistance in site investigations and was a field team lead during select sampling efforts. Investigation activities included boring logs, soil sample collection, and XRF analysis of metals. Contaminants of potential concern at the site include metals, polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic hydrocarbons (VOCs). Additionally, Kaitlin authored relevant sampling plans, Removal Action Work Plans, and Implementation Reports. [Performed while at Ahtna Facility Services, Inc. in 2016-2018] 1567
Geologist I Brian D. Sefcik
1 Sefcik Brian_10.30.19.docx 10/30/2019
Experience Summary
Brian Sefcik is a geologist with over 5 years of experience ranging from field activities, state and federal compliance reporting, writing documents that report on findings in field activities, and sample collecting. His experience in the environmental field includes inspecting oil and gas wells and site in correlation with federal and state regulations, working with federal agencies for remediation of contamination, and writing environmental inspections for public view. Mr. Sefcik’s experience also include various field activities for field sampling and soil testing.

Project Experience
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, DR Horton, Nationwide Staff Geologist. Completing Phase I ESAs by following all appropriate inquiries (AAI). Responsibilities include project coordination, technical report writing, historical and physical setting research, review of prior assessments, and regulatory database analysis and reporting. [2019 - Present] Previous Experience
Patriot Engineering and Environmental, Inc, Goodlettsville, Tennessee Construction Material Technician. Collected concrete samples for compressive strength testing, soils inspections, reinforcing steel inspections, and soil and concrete testing. [2018 – 2019]
Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio
Mineral Resource Inspector II. Inspect oil and gas well in Ohio for compliance with federal and stare regulations. Work with any Federal Agency (EPS and Wildlife) when the need arose to ensure compliance of wells. Remediate any spills with federal and state regulations and ensure all contamination was eliminated. Authoring, reviewing, and editing clear, concise, well-organized, and legally defensible documents that are readily understood for the public. [2015 – 2018]
Horizon Well Logging LLC, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Logging Geologist II. Collected, cleaned, and analyzed cutting samples from drilling process. Use of Main Log software in order to collect data and develop subsurface models with lithological descriptions of sedimentary rocks. Had familiarity of porosity types in sedimentary rocks and, picked formation tops with lithologic knowledge. [2014- 2015]
Assignment
Due Diligence
Education
B.S., Geology, Marietta College,
Ohio, 2014
Registration
OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety
and Health Training
First Aid and CPR Certified
Experience
5 years
Joined Firm
2019
Relevant Expertise
• Soil Sampling
• Oil and gas well compliance
inspections
1568
Senior Manager, Client Services John Nash
1 Nash, John [04/10/2017] 5/30/2017
Experience Summary
Mr. Nash has over 22 years of experience as an environmental professional including experience managing large, multi-task programs and hands-on field experience on hazardous waste cost-reimbursable and fixedprice projects involving site characterization. He is very knowledgeable of federal, state, and appropriate local laws and regulations. Mr. Nash's program management experience has encompassed the full range of environmental compliance and permitting, due diligence, site assessment, remediation services, and construction quality assurance. He has been responsible and accountable for contracts valued in excess of $50 million, including single programs greater than $20 million.

In the past 5 years, Mr. Nash has been responsible for over $30 million in active projects. These project sites have included locations in all 50 states and involved site work at various military installations. He has managed turnkey projects ranging from $2,000 to $20 million. On these contracts, Mr. Nash served as the single point of responsibility, authority, and accountability with clients, holding scheduled status meetings, participating in partnering sessions, implementing all contractual commitments and policies, and taking immediate corrective actions when necessary. He has also conducted Department of Transportation (DOT) training programs to familiarize staff with the hazardous material shipping programs.

Mr. Nash has prepared estimates, proposals, and plans; supervised field work; implemented safety and quality control programs; and tracked and controlled costs and schedule for both commercial and federal clientele.

Project Experience
Construction Environmental Health & Safety Compliance Audits, Confidential Commercial Client
Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, budget, and quality for retail client requiring construction audits at 500 retail facilities nationwide. The audit included examination of health and safety, stormwater pollution prevention, hazardous waste management, and employee verification practices conducted by the client’s general contractor during remodel activities. Able to coordinate site visits with other on-site activities to save the client cost.

Annual Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) Tier II Reporting, Norfolk Southern Corporation Project Manager. Managed and improved the data gather process, threshold determination, and report preparation and submittal process for annual EPCRA submittals.

Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Project Manager. Prepared and managed the process of preparing and updating multiple SPCC plans in both Georgia and Nevada. These incorporated both administrative and technical changes at the sites.

Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Plans, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Project Manager. Managed the process of updating multiple SWPP plans in both Georgia and Nevada.

Health and Safety Assessments, Dollar Tree
Client Service Manager. Managed a multi-year program involving the assessment of basic health and safety elements at the retail store level. The assessments were conducted nationwide over a two-year period.

Education
B.S., Geology, University of South
Florida, 1994
Experience
22 years
Joined Firm
2016
Additional Training
 OSHA 40-hour HAZWOPER 29
CFR 1910.120, 1995
 OSHA 8-hour Supervisor
Training for Hazardous Waste
site, 1996
 US Army Corp – Certified
Construction Quality
Management for Contractors,
2003
 Large Account Management
Process by Miller Heiman,
2006
 First Aid/CPR/AED Certification
 DOT General Awareness DOT
49 CFR 172.704(a)(1)
1569
John Nash
2 Nash, Joh [4/10/2017] 5/30/2017
Annual EPCRA Tier II Reporting, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Manager of EPCRA Section 311 and 312 Hazardous Chemical Inventory reporting for Fortune 100 client with over 4,500 locations nationwide. Documented and improved the data gathering process, threshold determination, and report preparation and submittal process for the annual EPCRA submittals.

Waste Segregation and Environmental Auditing, Walgreens, California Client Service Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget involving the investigation and segregation of hazardous waste found in waste receptacles at over 600 retail stores and logistics facilities. This program spanned a 5-year period, with multiple audits per site, and included the development of a specific e-reporting tool used for gathering field data, capable of being communicated quickly to the client.

Annual EPCRA Tier II Reporting, Lowe’s Companies
Client Service Manager. Managed and improved the data gather process, threshold determination, and report preparation and submittal process for the annual EPCRA submittals.

Waste Segregation, Lowe’s Companies, California
Client Service Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for project involving the annual auditing of waste receptacles for the presence of hazardous waste at retail stores in California. Audits were conducted at either the transfer stations or the client sites.

Environmental Site Assessments in the Southeastern United States, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and CB Richard Ellis
Project Manager. Managed local site assessors in the completion of Phase I activities including site visits, searches for historical aerial photographs, ownership records, deed searches, and regulatory review, which included the review of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) reports.

Hazardous Materials Shipping Support Services, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for a confidential commercial client. Visited over 4,000 facilities to assist employees in verifying that products going to a centralized return center to meet DOT requirements were packaged according to their classification (hazardous vs. non-hazardous). Responsibilities included on-site education and review of proper shipping instructions with facility representatives, and evaluation of on-site hazardous waste programs against company defined programs with real-time corrections of deviations.

Asset Investigation and Reconciliation Project, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for a confidential commercial client. Tasks included identifying potential owned/operated water sources, including wells, surface water intakes, or other third party provided water located at facilities nationwide, with a specific focus on the confirmation of the water wells previously identified.

Environmental Asset Inventory for Operating Facilities, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for a confidential commercial client as it applied to the inventory of environmental assets that had or may have had potential environmental ramifications such as regulatory obligations, the potential to cause environmental releases to the soil, water or air, or the need for routine maintenance or servicing provided by Environmental Services.

Environmental Permitting Review, Confidential Commercial Client Store Planning Group Project Manager. Assisted in managing scope, schedule, and budget for confidential commercial client as it applied to environmental permit review and SPCC plans. The environmental permit review applied to aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), pressure vessels, waste management, wastewater discharge, stormwater discharge, air quality/air emissions. These permit reviews focused on changes caused by the remodeling of existing facilities.

Dye-trace Testing of Plumbing, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for the construction quality assurance of plumbing installation. Managed the oversight of plumbing contractors conducting dye-trace testing of drain lines to 1570
John Nash
3 Nash, Joh [4/10/2017] 5/30/2017
ensure that the construction specifications were being met and that wastewater permit limits could be met by the facility.

Horse Pasture Site Remediation, Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment (AFCEE), Robins Air Force Base, Georgia
Project Manager. Responsible for the financial success of this performance-based contract totaling $8.6 million, as it applied to the scope, schedule, and budget. Site soils contaminated with heavy metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and pesticides were remediated and removed from the site. Returned site groundwater impacted by VOCs (including dense non-aqueous phase liquids [DNAPLs]) to levels below remedial limits and obtained a No Further Action from Georgia Environmental Protection Division.

Interim Measure (IM), AFCEE, Charleston Air Force Base, South Carolina Deputy Project Manager. Managed the implementation of an IM, which involved the installation of a geosynthetic landfill cover. Duties included management of scope, schedule, personnel, and subcontractors; subcontractor procurement; client interface; and fieldwork implementation.

RCRA Facility Investigations and Corrective Measure Studies, Multiple Project Sites, AFCEE, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and Patrick Air Force Base, Florida Project Manager. Duties included management of scope, schedule, budget, and personnel; proposal preparation; subcontractor procurement; client and regulator interface; fieldwork participation and implementation; groundwater modeling; and report completion. Work activities were completed at active and inactive launch complexes and fuel storage areas. All work activities were monitored and evaluated closely by the Canaveral Air Force Station/Patrick Air Force Base Environmental Restoration Partnering Team (Partnering Team), which consisted of representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the United States Air Force and various contractors.

St. John’s Water Management District, Lake Apopka North Shore Restoration Area, Florida Field Operations Lead. Conducted soil and sediment sampling across 10,000 acres of former farmland. Global Positioning System units were utilized to locate and survey sampling points with sub-meter accuracy. All field activities were monitored and evaluated closely by the St. Johns River Water Management District, USEPA, FDEP, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

Environmental Services, Naval Training Center (NTC), Orlando, Florida Scientist. Performed and developed tank closure assessments and reports, contamination assessment reports, initial remedial actions, and tank management plans for ASTs and USTs at multiple NTC Orlando sites.

The contamination assessment reports addressed petroleum soil, free product, and groundwater contamination. A focused remedial investigation/feasibility study was developed to be implemented as an interim action at a base dry cleaning facility. Project focused on dissolved phase DNAPL contamination in the subsurface migrating into a surface water body. Responsibilities included: planning and implementing a focused remedial investigation and pumping test; acting as field operations lead for the investigation and test; and developing a focused feasibility study.

Phase I/II ESAs, Multiple Clients
Scientist. Conducted Phase I/II ESAs for multiple clients. Phase I activities included site visits, searches for historical aerial photographs, ownership records, deed searches, and regulatory review. Preparation of the Phase I ESA reports included detailed recommendations for Phase II investigation. 1571
Noise Supporting Information
1572

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1573
1 Project Number: 2118.0006 Sheet 1 of 2
Project Name: Skelly Residential
Test Personnel: Jennifer Vitanza
Noise Measurement Survey
Site Number: LT 1 Date: 03/16/2022 Time: From To
Site Location: Skelly Residential project in Hercules, CA, southeast portion of project site, approximately 50-feet from the edge of railline
Primary Noise Sources:Primary noise sources were the train, also noise was from activity at the senior center facility across the road on the south end of the property was audible.

Measurement Results Observed Noise Sources/Events
Time Noise Source/Event dBA

Comments: Day of the measurment, the weather was very mild with a wind factor of 5MPH coming from the northeast. Sunny, no clouds. The day I picked up the noise meter on the 17th, it had rained lighty for half an hour at 10am, then went away quickly, still sunny with some clouds and the wind had picked up to 8MPH.

Equipment: Larson Davis LXT Measured Difference: .05
dBA
Settings: A-Weighted Other Slow Fast Windscreen
Atmospheric Conditions:

Maximum Wind
Velocity (mph)
Average Wind
Velocity (mph) Temperature (F)
Relative
Humidity (%)
8 5 64 48

Comments:
dBA
Leq 57.5
Lmax 95.4
Lmin 33.8
Lpeak
L5
L10
L50
L90
SEL
1574
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.198.s
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0004397
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.301
User
Location
Job Description
Note
Measurement
Description
Start 2022‐03‐16  23:06:57
Stop 2022‐03‐17  23:14:48
Duration 24:07:51.0
Run Time 24:07:51.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre‐Calibration 2022‐03‐16  23:05:01
Post‐Calibration None
Calibration Deviation ‐‐‐
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight A Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamplifier PRMLxT2B
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
Overload 140.9 dB
A CZ
Under Range Peak 97.1 94.1 99.1 dB
Under Range Limit 35.5 33.5 41.5 dB
Noise Floor 23.1 23.5 30.8 dB
First Second Third
Instrument Identification FCS1 Fresno
Results
LAeq 57.5
LAE 106.9
EA 5.404 mPa²h
EA8 1.791 mPa²h
EA40 8.957 mPa²h
LApeak (max) 109.4 dB
LASmax 95.4 dB
LASmin 33.8 dB
SEA ‐99.9 dB
Exceedance Counts
LAS > 85.0 dB 10 34.4 s
LAS > 115.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 135.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 137.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 140.0 dB 0 0.0 s
Community Noise Ldn LDay 07:00‐22:00 LNight 22:00‐07:00 Lden LDay 07:00‐19:00 LEvening 19:00‐22:00 LNight 22:00‐07:00

60.6 59.0 52.4 61.5 58.8 59.7 52.4
LCeq 68.0 dB
LAeq 57.5 dB
LCeq ‐ LAeq 10.5 dB
LAIeq 60.9 dB
LAeq 57.5 dB
LAIeq ‐ LAeq 3.4 dB
dB       Time Stamp dB       Time Stamp dB       Time Stamp Leq 57.5 68.0
LS(max) 95.4
LS(min) 33.8
LPeak(max) 109.4
Overload Count 0
Overload Duration 0.0 s
Dose Settings
Dose Name OSHA‐1 OSHA‐2
Exchange Rate 55 dB
Threshold 90 80 dB
Criterion Level 90 90 dB
Criterion Duration 88 h
Results
Dose 0.01 0.15 %
Projected Dose 0.00 0.05 %
TWA (Projected) 18.4 35.3 dB
TWA (t) 26.3 43.2 dB
Lep (t) 62.3 62.3 dB
Statistics
LA 5.00 52.1 dB
LA 10.00 50.2 dB
LA 33.30 46.8 dB
LA 50.00 45.2 dB
LA 66.60 43.6 dB
LA 90.00 40.2 dB
Duration
A CZ
LxT_0004397‐20220303 230657‐LxT_Data.198.ldbin
1575
TABLE Existing-01

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 290 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 44.95 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________

1576
TABLE Existing-02

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6000 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.03 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 91.3
______________________________________________________________________

1577
TABLE Existing-03

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21200 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.17 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

58.1 116.4 246.4 528.8
______________________________________________________________________

1578
TABLE Existing plus Project-01

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing plus Project
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 570 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 47.88 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________

1579
TABLE Existing plus Project-02

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing plus Project
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6400 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.31 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 95.2
______________________________________________________________________

1580
TABLE Existing plus Project-03

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing plus Project
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21400 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.21 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

58.4 117.1 248.0 532.1
______________________________________________________________________

1581
TABLE Cumulative-01

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 330 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 45.51 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________

1582
TABLE Cumulative-02

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7000 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.70 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 100.8
______________________________________________________________________

1583
TABLE Cumulative-03

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 24500 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.80 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

63.0 127.7 271.2 582.3
______________________________________________________________________

1584
TABLE Cumulative plus Project-01

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative plus Project ______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 710 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 48.83 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________

1585
TABLE Cumulative plus Project-02

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative plus Project ______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7400 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

0.0 0.0 0.0 104.5
______________________________________________________________________

1586
TABLE Cumulative plus Project-03

FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative plus Project ______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 24700 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5

TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES

DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS

88.08 9.34

M-TRUCKS

1.65 0.19

H-TRUCKS

0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.84 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------

63.3 128.3 272.6 585.4
______________________________________________________________________ 1587
U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2130-0017
Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings: For public highway-rail grade crossings, complete the entire inventory Form. For private highway-rail grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings (including pedestrian station grade crossings), complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For Private pathway grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings (including pedestrian station crossings), complete the Header, Part I, and the Submission Information section. For changes to existing data, complete the Header, Part I Items 1-3, and the Submission Information section, in addition to the updated data fields. Note: For private crossings only, Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K. are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk * denotes an optional field.

A. Revision Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)
_____/_____/_________
B. Reporting Agency C. Reason for Update (Select only one) D. DOT Crossing  Railroad  Transit  Change in Inventory Number
Data
 New
Crossing
 Closed  No Train
Traffic
 Quiet
Zone Update
 State  Other  Re-Open  Date
Change Only
 Change in Primary
Operating RR
 Admin.

Correction
Part I: Location and Classification Information

1. Primary Operating Railroad
_____________________________________________________

2. State
________________________________

3. County
____________________________________

4. City / Municipality
 In
 Near __________________________

5. Street/Road Name & Block Number
________________________________| __________________
(Street/Road Name) |* (Block Number)

6. Highway Type & No.
_______________________________________

7. Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing?  Yes  No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________

8. Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing?  Yes  No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________

9. Railroad Division or Region
 None _______________________

10. Railroad Subdivision or District
 None _______________________

11. Branch or Line Name
 None _______________________

12. RR Milepost
_______|____________|____________
(prefix) | (nnnn.nnn) | (suffix)

13. Line Segment
*
_________________________

14. Nearest RR Timetable
Station *
__________________________

15. Parent RR (if applicable)
 N/A _____________________________

16. Crossing Owner (if applicable)
 N/A _________________________________

17. Crossing Type
 Public
 Private

18. Crossing Purpose
 Highway
 Pathway, Ped.
 Station, Ped.

19. Crossing Position
 At Grade
 RR Under
 RR Over

20. Public Access
(if Private Crossing)
 Yes
 No

21. Type of Train
 Freight
 Intercity Passenger
 Commuter
 Transit
 Shared Use Transit
 Tourist/Other

22. Average Passenger
Train Count Per Day
 Less Than One Per Day
 Number Per Day_____

23. Type of Land Use
 Open Space  Farm  Residential  Commercial  Industrial  Institutional  Recreational  RR Yard

24. Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number?  Yes  No If Yes, Provide Crossing Number __________________

25. Quiet Zone (FRA provided)
 No  24 Hr  Partial  Chicago Excused Date Established _________________

26. HSR Corridor ID
__________________ N/A

27. Latitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn)

28. Longitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)

29. Lat/Long Source
 Actual  Estimated

30.A. Railroad Use * 31.A. State Use *

30.B. Railroad Use * 31.B. State Use *

30.C. Railroad Use * 31.C. State Use *

30.D. Railroad Use * 31.D. State Use *

32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) * 32.B. Narrative (State Use) *

33. Emergency Notification Telephone No. (posted)
_________________________________

34. Railroad Contact (Telephone No.)
______________________________________

35. State Contact (Telephone No.)
_________________________________
Part II: Railroad Information

1. Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements

1.A. Total Day Thru Trains
(6 AM to 6 PM)
__________

1.B. Total Night Thru Trains
(6 PM to 6 AM)
__________

1.C. Total Switching Trains
__________

1.D. Total Transit Trains
__________

1.E. Check if Less Than
One Movement Per Day 
How many trains per week? ______

2. Year of Train Count Data (YYYY)
__________

3. Speed of Train at Crossing

3.A. Maximum Timetable Speed (mph) __________

3.B. Typical Speed Range Over Crossing (mph) From __________ to __________

4. Type and Count of Tracks
Main __________ Siding __________ Yard __________ Transit __________ Industry __________

5. Train Detection (Main Track only)
 Constant Warning Time  Motion Detection AFO  PTC  DC  Other  None

6. Is Track Signaled?
 Yes  No

7.A. Event Recorder
 Yes  No

7.B. Remote Health Monitoring
 Yes  No
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 1 OF 2 ✘ ✘
11 07 2019
029824K
BNSF Railway Company [BNSF] CALIFORNIA CONTRA COSTA PINOLE ✘ SAN PABLO RD CA 40 ✘ ✘ CALIFORNIA STOCKTON CALWA-RICHMOND 1181.270 7200 PINOLE ✘ BNSF ✘ ✘
✘
✘
0 ✘
✘ ✘
✘

38.0082731 -122.286590
✘
( I.27 I.28 I.29)Value Provided by Railroad, Not Yet Reported by State 800-832-5452 817-352-1549 415-703-3722 6 6 0 0 1 ✘
45 2019 1 45 1 0 0 0 0
✘
✘
1588
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 2 OF 2 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
A. Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) PAGE 2 D. Crossing Inventory Number (7 char.) Part III: Highway or Pathway Traffic Control Device Information

1. Are there
Signs or Signals?
 Yes  No

2. Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing

2.A. Crossbuck
Assemblies (count)

2.B. STOP Signs (R1-1)
(count)

2.C. YIELD Signs (R1-2)
(count)

2.D. Advance Warning Signs (Check all that apply; include count)  None  W10-1 ________  W10-3 ________  W10-11 __________
 W10-2 ________  W10-4 ________  W10-12 __________

2.E. Low Ground Clearance Sign
(W10-5)
 Yes (count_______)
 No

2.F. Pavement Markings 2.G. Channelization
Devices/Medians

2.H. EXEMPT Sign
(R15-3)
 Yes
 No

2.I. ENS Sign (I-13)
Displayed
 Yes
 No
 Stop Lines
 RR Xing Symbols
Dynamic Envelope
 None
 All Approaches
 One Approach
 Median
 None

2.J. Other MUTCD Signs  Yes  No 2.K. Private Crossing Signs (if private)
 Yes  No

2.L. LED Enhanced Signs (List types)
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Count __________
Count __________
Count __________

3. Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing (specify count of each device for all that apply)

3.A. Gate Arms
(count)
Roadway _____
Pedestrian _____

3.B. Gate Configuration 3.C. Cantilevered (or Bridged) Flashing Light Structures (count)

3.D. Mast Mounted Flashing Lights
(count of masts) _________

3.E. Total Count of
Flashing Light Pairs
 2 Quad
 3 Quad
 4 Quad
 Full (Barrier)
Resistance
 Median Gates
Over Traffic Lane _____
Not Over Traffic Lane _____
 Incandescent
 LED
 Incandescent
 Back Lights Included
 LED
 Side Lights
Included

3.F. Installation Date of Current
Active Warning Devices: (MM/YYYY)
______/___________  Not Required

3.G. Wayside Horn 3.H. Highway Traffic Signals Controlling Crossing
 Yes  No

3.I. Bells
(count)  Yes
 No
Installed on (MM/YYYY) ______/__________

3.J. Non-Train Active Warning
 Flagging/Flagman Manually Operated Signals  Watchman  Floodlighting  None

3.K. Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices
Count ___________ Specify type ______________________

4.A. Does nearby Hwy
Intersection have
Traffic Signals?
 Yes  No

4.B. Hwy Traffic Signal
Interconnection
 Not Interconnected
 For Traffic Signals
 For Warning Signs

4.C. Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5. Highway Traffic Pre-Signals  Yes  No

6. Highway Monitoring Devices
(Check all that apply)
 Yes - Photo/Video Recording
 Yes – Vehicle Presence Detection
 None
 Simultaneous
 Advance
Storage Distance * ____________
Stop Line Distance * ____________
Part IV: Physical Characteristics

1. Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad  One-way Traffic
 Two-way Traffic
Number of Lanes _______  Divided Traffic

2. Is Roadway/Pathway
Paved?
 Yes  No

3. Does Track Run Down a Street?
 Yes  No

4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street
lights within approx. 50 feet from
nearest rail)  Yes  No

5. Crossing Surface (on Main Track, multiple types allowed) Installation Date * (MM/YYYY) _______/__________ Width * ______________ Length * _______________  1 Timber  2 Asphalt  3 Asphalt and Timber  4 Concrete  5 Concrete and Rubber  6 Rubber  7 Metal  8 Unconsolidated  9 Composite  10 Other (specify) ________________________________________________________

6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet?
 Yes  No If Yes, Approximate Distance (feet) _________________

7. Smallest Crossing Angle
 0° – 29°  30° – 59°  60° - 90°

8. Is Commercial Power Available? *
 Yes  No
Part V: Public Highway Information

1. Highway System
 (01) Interstate Highway System
 (02) Other Nat Hwy System (NHS)
 (03) Federal AID, Not NHS
 (08) Non-Federal Aid

2. Functional Classification of Road at Crossing
 (0) Rural  (1) Urban
 (1) Interstate  (5) Major Collector
 (2) Other Freeways and Expressways
 (3) Other Principal Arterial  (6) Minor Collector
 (4) Minor Arterial  (7) Local

3. Is Crossing on State Highway
System?
 Yes  No

4. Highway Speed Limit
___________ MPH
 Posted  Statutory

5. Linear Referencing System (LRS Route ID) *

6. LRS Milepost *

7. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Year _______ AADT _____________

8. Estimated Percent Trucks
___________________ %

9. Regularly Used by School Buses?
 Yes  No Average Number per Day ___________

10. Emergency Services Route
 Yes  No
Submission Information - This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website.

Submitted by __________________________________ Organization _______________________________________ Phone _______________ Date _____________ Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection, including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, MS-25 Washington, DC 20590.
11/07/2019 029824K ✘
0 0
✘
✘
0 0
0 0
0 ✘
0 0
✘ ✘
1970 ✘ 0
1589
Public Services Supporting Information
1590

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1591

REQUEST LETTER
February 24, 2022
Darren Johnson, Acting Fire Chief
Rodeo-Hercules Fire District
1680 Refugio Valley Road
Hercules, CA 94547
Subject: Skelly Residential Project IS/MND: Fire Protection Services Dear Fire Chief Johnson:

FirstCarbon Solutions is preparing an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), as required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), to evaluate the environmental impacts of a proposed development within the City of Hercules. As part of the environmental review process, we are consulting with public service providers to determine whether the project would impact their ability to deliver services. We are contacting you to request information related to provision of fire and emergency services in Hercules.

As shown in Attachment A, the 7.3-acre project site is located at 215 Skelly on Accessor’s Parcel Number [APN] No. 404-020-012. The site currently contains a single-family residence, 58 horse paddocks, a permitted 2,400 square foot storage building, miscellaneous outbuildings, and a large metal clad shed that appear to be abandoned relics of the site’s previous use as a farm. According to the City of Hercules General Plan Land Use and the Hercules Zoning Map, the site is zoned Residential Single-Family Low Density (RS-L).

The project applicant is proposing the development of a residential subdivision consisting of 40 single-family residence lots on the 7.3-acre project site. Development of the proposed project would involve the removal of the existing trees, vegetation, and existing structures currently on the project site. The proposed project would divide the project site into eight separate parcels (Parcels A-G) and 40 single-family residential lots. The residential lots would range from 3,836 square-feet to 6,887 square-feet (Attachment B).

Potential impacts to public services are an important element of our analysis. Our analysis strongly relies on your assistance in identifying potentially significant impacts to fire protection services that may occur as a result of the project, as well as any mitigation measure(s) that may reduce or eliminate these impacts. Any assistance that you can provide with addressing the following questions would be greatly appreciated. 1592
Service Questions

1. Which station(s) would provide services to the project site?

2. What are the existing staffing levels, by type (department-wide and at the station(s) that would serve the project site)? What is the current number of firefighters, EMT personnel, engines, hook and ladder trucks, etc.?

3. Please provide the current average response times for emergency calls for service as a whole and for the station(s) located nearest to the project site.

4. Please provide an estimate of the annual number of service calls the proposed project would be expected to generate. If possible, please provide an estimate by type of call (e.g., EMS, fire, etc.)

5. What is the ability of the fire department to accommodate the demand of the proposed project as part of the existing facilities?

6. Are there any existing or planned mutual aid agreements with other agencies?

7. Please provide information about the residential and non-residential development fee schedule. What are the current rates? What is the estimate rate for the proposed project?
1593
Thank you for your assistance in responding to these questions. Your responses will help us ensure that our analysis is accurate and complete. To ensure a timely completion of our analysis, please provide your response via e-mail no later than Friday, March 11th, 2022. If you have any questions or need additional time to respond, please contact me by e-mail at [email protected]

8. Do you foresee any potential challenges that the project may present to the department? This includes concerns related to response times, staffing, apparatus, fire stations, etc. Please describe any measures that you would recommend to reduce potential concerns/challenges.

9. Would the development of the proposed project impair the fire department’s ability to maintain established response time standards with current staff and equipment levels?

10. Would the fire department need to construct new facilities or expand existing ones in order to serve the proposed project and the fire protection needs of the surrounding community?

11. Do you have any other comments about the potential impacts of this project on the fire department? Please provide any recommendations or special concerns that may assist us in avoiding or reducing the occurrence of potential impacts to fire services associated with the project. 1594
Sincerely,
Madelyn Dolan, Environmental Services Assistant Project Manager FirstCarbon Solutions
1350 Treat Blvd. Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Enc: Attachment A: Local Vicinity Map
Attachment B: Site Plan
1595
Attachment A:

Local Vicinity Map
1596
21180006 • 12/2021 | 2_local_vicinity.mxd
Local Vicinity Map
Source: bing Aerial Imagery. County of Contra Costa Parcel Data.

CITY OF HERCULES

SKELLY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1,000 500 0 1,000
Feet
Legend
Project Site
City Limits
City of Hercules
City of Pinole
1597
Attachment B:

Site Plan
1598
I
21180006 • 12/2021 | 4_site_plan.cdr
Site Plan

CITY OF HERCULES

SKELLY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Source: CBG Civil Engineers, November 2021.
1599

1. Which station(s) would provide services to the project site? Hercules PD only has one station for the entire City.

2. Please describe the existing staffing levelsthat would serve the projectsite. Please include a description of number of officers, civilian personnel, active patrols at one time, etc.

At any given time there are the following personnel on the street: 1 Sergeant, 3 Police Officers, 1 Parking Enforcement Officer. Dispatch services are by contract through Pinole PD. Animal Control is by contract through the County.

3. Please provide the current average response times for emergency calls for service as a whole and for the station(s) located nearest to the project site.
“…for emergency calls” is a fairly broad spectrum. Our average response time for all crime reports is 3 minutes 3 seconds. Shorter for in-progress crimes, longer for cold reports.

4. Would the development of the proposed project impair the police department’s ability to maintain established response time standards with current staff and equipment levels? No.

5. Please provide an estimate of the officers/1,000 residents and the target ratio that the department would like to achieve.

We are slightly below the 1/1,000 ratio the City Council tries to maintain. We have 27 sworn positions and a population closer to 28,000.

6. List any existing or planned mutual aid agreements with other agencies.

We have a written County-Wide mutual aid agreement with every agency in the County which covers incidents large and small. We have unwritten mutual aid understandings with Pinole PD to cover each other on more regular calls.

7. Please provide an estimate of the annual number of calls for service the proposed project would be expected to generate.
150 – 200 based on the build-out population increase of 200 residents.

8. What are the current rates of the residential development fees? What is the estimated rate for the proposed project?
I don’t have an answer for this question. Community Development would be better suited. 1600

9. Do you foresee any potential challenges that the proposed project may present to the department? (Including concerns related to response times, staffing, apparatus, stations, etc.) Please describe any measures you would recommend to reduce potential concerns/challenges.

The area is isolated from the view of surrounding neighborhoods, with easy foot and bicycle access from the creek area on the border of town, popular with homeless people. In a critical incident response there will be avenues of escape my Officers won’t be able to get to easily or quickly. With only one avenue of approach for vehicular traffic creating a funnel effect there is the potential for a bottleneck during a large scale response, or natural disaster, even with the EVA.

10. Would the department need to construct new facilities or expand existing ones in order to serve the proposed project and the law enforcement needs of the City? This project by itself does not create such a need, but in combination with others in progress creating the need for increased staffing, yes, our existing facility is not large enough to accommodate us.

11. Do you have any other comments about the potential impacts of this project on the police department? Please provide any recommendations or special concerns that may assist us in avoiding or reducing the occurrence of potential impacts to police services associated with the project.

No additional comments. Thank you for taking the time to ask for our input.

William T. Imboden
Chief Of Police
1601
From: Silvia Garfield
To: Maddie Dolan
Cc: Melissa Payne
Subject: Fwd: 2118.0006 Skelly Residential Project School Services Letter Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:44:51 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Hello Maddie,
Below is the information you requested.

Thank you,
Silvia
Silvia Garfield
Senior Administrative Assistant
Office of the Associate Superintendent
Operations
Phone 510-231-1105
[email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ellen Mejia Hooper <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: 2118.0006 Skelly Residential Project School Services Letter To: Silvia Garfield <[email protected]>
Cc: Melissa Payne <[email protected]>
Hi Silvia
I think Melissa responded to #5 but here are the remainder of the answers.

Please identify the current enrollment and capacity of the District as a whole. Please also identify the District’s area of enrollment.
· District enrollment area can be seen on the map at this website (http://apps.schoolsitelocator.com/index.html?districtCode=32073). It includes the cities of El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Pinole, Hercules, and unincorporated areas of the county.

Because this area is so large, there are varying conditions across the District · Current (2021/22) K-12 enrollment using CBEDS data is 25,992 students · Current K-12 capacity District-wide is 29,492 seats

2. Please provide the current standard student generation factors used by the District. · Current standard is from our residential housing study 1602

3. Please list the school(s) that may be affected by the proposed project and their current capacity/enrollment ratio.
· Ohlone Elementary School – 102% utilization
· Hercules Middle School – 111% utilization
· Hercules High School – 73% utilization

4. Please identify the ability to accommodate the schools demand of the proposed project as part of the existing facilities.

This area's elementary and middle schools are currently over-enrolled, so accommodating these additional students within the existing facilities without 1603
modifications or other adjustments would be challenging.

The high school does have the capacity to accommodate the additional students.

5. Please provide information about the residential and non-residential development fee
*EFFECTIVE 08/24/2020 LEVEL 1 RATE INCREASE TO $4.08*
*Effective 06/01/2020 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL RATE INCREASE TO $0.66* Additions to existing residences under 500 square feet – No Fee Mini Storage Fee - $0.09 per square foot
Additions to existing residences 500 sq. ft. and above - $4.08 per square foot (on the entire additional square footage)*
New Residential Construction - $4.08 per square foot*
Commercial / Industrial / Exclusive Senior Housing - $0.66 per square foot *

6. Please define any potential challenges that the proposed project may present to the District. Please describe any measures that you would recommend to reduce potential concerns/challenges.

The District is embarking on a student housing study to address the need to balance our enrollment and align it with the space available; however, the geographic features, transportation systems, and student resident locations make such balancing difficult.

The Hercules area is impacted at the elementary and middle school levels and is isolated from the remainder of the district. To accommodate student enrollment, additional capacity may need to be added to Ohlone Elementary and Hercules Middle.

Another measure could include adjusting attendance boundaries. ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Maddie Dolan <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 8:57 AM
Subject: 2118.0006 Skelly Residential Project School Services Letter To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Tsui Li <[email protected]>, Robert Reber <[email protected]> 1604
Hello,
Attached is a letter pertaining to the proposed Skelly Residential project located in the City of Hercules. The letter provides a basic project description and asks a few questions about your department’s ability to service the new development. If you could please review the letter and attached site plan to provide responses by Friday, March 11, your input would greatly assist us in the completion of our environmental analysis. If you have questions, please reach out at any time.

Thank you,
Madelyn Dolan (she | her | hers)
Environmental Services, Assistant Project Manager
Mobile +1 925 451 7133
FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS)
An ADEC Innovation
LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter
--
Ellen Mejia Hooper
Director of Facilities Planning and Construction
O: 510-307-4544 C: 510-778-6473
Follow Us on Facebook and Instagram @WCCUSDfacilities
1400 Marina Way S
Richmond, CA 94804
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
Transportation Analysis
1610

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1611
Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report
215 Skelly Residential Development
February 28, 2022
City of Hercules, California
1612
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Page | i
Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4

1.1 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4

1.2 Study Intersections .................................................................................................................................................................. 4

1.3 Study Scenarios ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.0 Study Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 8

2.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled ........................................................................................................................................................... 8

2.2 Level of Service Analysis Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 8

2.3 Level of Service Standards ..................................................................................................................................................10

3.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 12

3.1 Existing Setting and Roadway System ...........................................................................................................................12

3.2 Existing Pedestrian Facilities ..............................................................................................................................................12

3.3 Existing Bicycle Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................15

3.4 Existing Transit Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................17

3.5 Existing Traffic Conditions ..................................................................................................................................................19

3.6 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions .................................................................................21

4.0 Existing plus Project Conditions .......................................................................................................... 23

4.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled .........................................................................................................................................................23

4.2 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................................23

4.3 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ...................................................................................................................24

4.5 Intersection Queuing Analysis ..........................................................................................................................................26

5.0 Cumulative No-Project Conditions (2040) .......................................................................................... 29

5.1 Intersections Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative No-Project Conditions ................................................29

6.0 Cumulative plus Project Conditions .................................................................................................... 31

6.1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions ................................................31

7.0 Additional Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 33

7.1 Site Access ................................................................................................................................................................................33

9.2 On-Site Circulation ................................................................................................................................................................34

9.3 Parking........................................................................................................................................................................................34 1613
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Page | ii

9.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................35 Tables
Table 1: Signalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions ................................................................................................ 9 Table 2: Unsignalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions........................................................................................ 10 Table 3: Existing Bus Services ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ........................................................................... 21 Table 5: Year 2020 VMT Generation .......................................................................................................................................... 23 Table 6: Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................................................................. 24 Table 7: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions .................................................. 26 Table 8. 95th Percentile Queue Lengths at Selected Turn Lanes: .................................................................................... 27 Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 27 Table 12: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative Conditions ................................................................. 29 Table 13: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions ........................................ 31 Figures
Figure 1: Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2: Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 3: Existing Pedestrian Facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4: Existing Bicycle Facilities .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 5: Existing Transit Facilities .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 6: Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls ...................................................................................................... 20 Figure 7: Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................. 22 Figure 8: Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................................................................................. 25 Figure 9: Existing plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................................................................ 28 Figure 10: Cumulative No-Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................ 30 Figure 11: Cumulative plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 32 Appendices
Appendix A – Existing Turning Movement Counts
Appendix B – Existing Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets 1614
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Page | iii
Appendix C - CCTA TAZ Boundaries
Appendix D – Existing plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E – Cumulative Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix F – Cumulative plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets 1615
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the results of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) conducted for the proposed residential development located at 215 Skelly in the City of Hercules. The project would replace a former horse ranch with 40 single family homes.

The purpose of this report is to provide summaries of changes in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and traffic impacts on the surrounding transportation system with the proposed project. The VMT analysis is based on the methodology adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). To evaluate the effects on the transportation infrastructure due to the addition of traffic from the proposed project, an LOS analysis was conducted to determine consistency with City of Hercules and CCTA plans and standards.

Vehicle Miles Traveled
In the project vicinity, the CCTA Travel Demand Model generates daily residential VMT per resident of 14.7 for 2020, well below the countywide average of 19.78. Based on the CCTA VMT screening threshold of

16.81 this is considered a low-VMT area, and there is no substantial evidence that the project would generate high VMTs for this location. The project is expected to cause a less-than-significant impact under CEQA and is exempt from further VMT analysis.

Project Trip Generation
TJKM developed estimated project trip generation for the proposed project based on published trip generation rates from the ITE publication Trip Generation (11th Edition). TJKM used published trip rates for the ITE land use Single Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210) for this project. The proposed project is expected to generate 377 total daily trips, including 28 net new a.m. peak hour trips (7 in, 21 out) and 38 net new p.m. peak hour trips (24 in, 14 out).

Existing Conditions
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during the a.m. peak hour, and both intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour.

Existing plus Project Conditions
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during a.m. peak hour, and both study intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.
1616
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 2
Cumulative Conditions
The Cumulative No-Project Conditions analysis forecasts how the study area’s transportation system would operate with the full build-out of the project in combination with the growth and changes of the surrounding community by the year 2040.

Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour.

Cumulative plus Project Conditions
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour, and deteriorate to LOS C during the p.m. peak hour with an increase in delay of 2.2 seconds. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour, and deteriorate to LOS D during the p.m. peak hour with an increased delay of 0.9 seconds. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.

Site Access and On-Site Circulation
TJKM concluded that the site plan will operate acceptably and provide adequate on-site vehicle circulation and access to parking spaces. The proposed project does not conflict with existing and planned pedestrian or bicycle facilities and will add trips to existing transit facilities, which can be accommodated by the existing transit capacity. Site access and circulation for vehicles are considered adequate, but on-site pedestrian circulation could be improved with additional curb ramps.

Parking
The project would require 80 off-street parking spaces for the 40 dwelling units. The proposed project would construct two-car garages with driveway aprons for each dwelling unit, providing 80 covered spaces satisfying City requirements, as well as 80 uncovered spaces. The proposed parking supply would therefore be more than adequate under City of Hercules requirements and would not produce any parking impacts on surrounding parcels or roadways.

Queuing Analysis
Queuing operations were analyzed at the one signalized intersection with dedicated left- and right-turn lanes, under Existing and Cumulative Conditions, with and without the proposed project. Under Existing Conditions, the signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would experience queue overflows in the eastbound left turn lane during PM peak hours, and overflows in the southbound left turn lane during one or both peak hours. Under Existing plus Project Conditions, the same turn lanes would continue to experience overflows during the same peak hours, with mild increases in queue lengths in the southbound left turn lane during the AM peak hours and a 20ft increase in queue lengths in the 1617
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 3
eastbound left turn lane during PM peak hours. The addition of project trips would not cause any new queue overflows.

Recommendations
TJKM recommends the following:
 The grading plans for the site should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the finished grade and landscaping do not create any visual obstructions for vehicles exiting the driveways.  Add curb ramps to provide accessible throughout the development. 1618
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 4

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the results of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) conducted for the proposed residential development located at 215 Skelly in the City of Hercules. The proposed project would replace a former horse ranch with 40 single family homes. Primary access to the project site would be provided by a private street connecting to Skelly at the location of the existing driveway. This chapter discusses the TIS purpose, project study area, and analysis scenarios. Figure 1 shows the study area and project site location. Figure 2 shows the project site plan, dated November, 2021.

1.1 STUDY PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to provide summaries of changes in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and traffic impacts on the surrounding transportation system. The VMT analysis is based on the methodology adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). To evaluate the effects on the transportation infrastructure due to the addition of traffic from the proposed project, an LOS analysis was conducted to determine consistency with City of Hercules and CCTA plans and standards.

1.2 STUDY INTERSECTIONS
TJKM evaluated traffic conditions at two study through remote field review.

The study intersections were selected based on TJKM’s working knowledge of the area with input and approval from the City of Hercules. San Pablo Avenue is identified as a Route of Regional Significance within the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) West County Action Plan. Due to ongoing traffic irregularities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, observed traffic volumes were increased by an adjustment factor to estimate typical traffic volumes. This is discussed further in section 3.5.

The peak periods observed were between 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 4:00-6:00 p.m. The study intersections and associated traffic controls are as follows:

1. Hercules Avenue and Skelly/Zeus (Two-Way Stop)

2. Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue (Signalized)

1.3 STUDY SCENARIOS
The roadway operations analysis addresses the following four traffic scenarios:
 Existing Conditions – This scenario evaluates the study intersections based on adjusted existing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic controls.
 Existing plus Project Conditions – This scenario is identical to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed project.
 Cumulative Conditions (2040) – This scenario considers the development of the city and surrounding communities to the year 2040, projecting existing traffic volumes to the year 2040 using an annual growth factor of 0.27 percent per year. This growth factor was derived from 2016 and 2040 traffic volumes contained in The Veranda Shopping Center TIS (2016, Kittelson & Associates), and ultimately based on the 2040 CCTA traffic model.
1619
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 5
 Cumulative plus Project Conditions – This scenario is identical to Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed project.
1620
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 6
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
1621
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 7
Figure 2: Site Plan
1622
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 8

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY
Traffic impacts related to the proposed project were evaluated for both compliance with applicable regulatory documents and environmental significance as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The CEQA analysis was conducted in accordance with the Technical Advisory On Evaluating Transportation Impacts In CEQA published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the July 1, 2020, Technical Memorandum prepared by Fehr & Peers describing the VMT methodology adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). As of July 1, 2020, intersection level of service (LOS) can no longer be used to determine significant CEQA impacts. However, an LOS analysis was conducted to determine consistency with City of Hercules and CCTA plans and standards.

2.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
This study evaluates project-related VMT as outlined in the adopted CCTA VMT methodology. The methodology and implementation guidelines were adopted by CCTA in July 2020. The City of Hercules has adopted CCTA VMT procedures and standards.

The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory (December 2018) provides guidance to analysts and local jurisdictions for implementing VMT as a metric for determining the transportation impact for land use projects. The OPR guidelines state that for analysis purposes, “VMT” refers to automobile VMT, specifically passenger vehicles and light trucks. Heavy truck traffic is typically excluded.

The CCTA guidelines include a screening process that describes five scenarios in which a project would be with exempted from a VMT analysis requirement: 1) projects exempt from CEQA analysis, 2) small projects, 3) local serving projects, 4) projects in transit priority areas, and 5) projects in low VMT areas.

Using the CCTA methodologies, it appears that the proposed residential project will meet the exemption requirements for a low-VMT area. It should be noted that even if a project satisfies one or more of the screening criteria, lead agencies may still require a VMT analysis if there is evidence that the project has characteristics that might lead to a significant amount of VMT.

The following language is from the Project Screening section of the CCTA VMT methodologies and was applied to the proposed project:

2.5: Projects Located in Low VMT Areas. Residential and employment-generating projects located within a low VMT-generating area can be presumed to have a less-than-significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. A low VMT area is defined as follows:
 For housing projects: Cities and unincorporated portions within CCTA’s five subregions that have existing home-based VMT per capita that is 85% or less of the existing County-wide average.

2.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
Although Level of Service (LOS) is no longer relevant to CEQA, LOS can be used to determine conformity with an adopted general plan or congestion management program. LOS is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions as they relate to the traffic stream and perceptions by motorists and 1623
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 9
passengers. The LOS generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, delays, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. The operational LOS are given letter designations from A to F, with A representing the best operating conditions (freeflow) and F the worst (severely congested flow with high delays). Intersections generally are the capacitycontrolling locations with respect to traffic operations on arterial and collector streets in urban areas.

Signalized Intersections
The study intersection under traffic signal control was analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual 6th (HCM) Operations Methodology for signalized intersections described in Chapter 18. This methodology determines LOS based on average control delay per vehicle for the overall intersection during peak hour intersection operating conditions. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections was calculated using Synchro 10 analysis software and was correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table

1. Table 1: Signalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions Level of Service Description
Average
Control
Delay
A
Signal progression is extremely favorable. Most vehicles arrive during the green phase and do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to the very low vehicle delay.

10.0 or less
B
Operations characterized by good signal progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average vehicle delay.

10.1 to 20.0
C
Higher delays may result from fair signal progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though may still pass through the intersection without stopping.

20.1 to 35.0
D
The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable signal progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.

35.1 to 55.0
E
This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor signal progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Individual cycle failures occur frequently.

55.1 to 80.0
F
This level of delay is considered unacceptable by most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major-contributing causes of such delay levels. greater than

80.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Ed., Chapter 18 (Transportation Research Board, 2010) Average Control Delay per Vehicle in seconds
1624
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 10
Unsignalized Intersections
The study intersection under stop control (unsignalized) was analyzed using the HCM Operations Methodology (HCM 6th Ed.) for unsignalized intersections described in Chapter 20. LOS ratings for stopsign controlled intersections are based on the average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At the side street, one-way or two-way stop controlled intersections, the control delay is calculated for each movement, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. The weighted average delay for the entire intersections is presented for all-way stop controlled intersections. The average control delay for unsignalized intersections was calculated using Synchro 10 analysis software and was correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Unsignalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, Chapter 20 (Transportation Research Board, 2010) Average Control Delay per Vehicle in seconds

2.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Although level of service is no longer used for identifying impacts under CEQA, level of service analysis is still used for determining consistency with adopted agency plans and standards. Where standards refer to significant environmental impacts, this analysis instead identifies these as significant inconsistencies with adopted plans.

City of Hercules
The City of Hercules General Plan has established performance benchmarks for signalized intersections and roadway segments within its jurisdiction. The City’s policy is to maintain LOS D as the desired level of service on intersections along all Basic Routes, which includes all arterials, collectors, and local roads that are not Regional Routes. One exception to this standard is the City’s policy that Collector Roads operating worse than LOS D are not considered deficient if the intersection does not meet a Caltrans signal warrant.

This avoids over-signalizing intersections with low side-street volumes.

There is no specified criteria for determining significant impacts to unsignalized intersections. For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that an unsignalized intersection experiences a significant inconsistency if the LOS falls below LOS D, and the intersection meets the MUTCD Peak Hour Signal Warrant during the same peak hour.

Level of Service Description Average Control Delay
A Little or no traffic delay ≤10
B Short Traffic delays >10 – 15
C Average traffic delays >15 – 25
D Long traffic delays >25 – 35
E Very long traffic delays >35 – 50
F Extreme traffic delays >50
1625
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 11
Contra Costa Transportation Authority CMP Intersections In the project vicinity, San Pablo Avenue is designated as a Route of Regional Significance (RORS). The intersection of San Pablo Avenue and Hercules Avenue is part of the CCTA Congestion Management Program (CMP) and subject to regular monitoring and separate LOS standards. The Congestion Management Program specifies level of service standards for intersections and RORS, but it does not provide specific thresholds of significance.

The LOS Standard for the San Pablo Avenue and Hercules Avenue is LOS E. The project-generated increase in traffic is considered to have a significant inconsistency with the CMP if an intersection meets either of the following criteria:
 If intersection operations degrade from an acceptable level (LOS E or better) to an unacceptable level (LOS F).
 For transportation facilities that fail to meet LOS standards (as defined above) under no project conditions, an increase in the volume/capacity ratio by 0.03 or greater above no project conditions is considered to be significant.
1626
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 12

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section describes existing conditions in the immediate project site vicinity, including roadway facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and available transit service. In addition, existing traffic volumes and operations are presented for the study intersections, including the results of LOS calculations.

3.1 EXISTING SETTING AND ROADWAY SYSTEM
Relevant roadways adjacent to the project site are discussed below:

Interstate 80 (I-80) From the Alameda County line to the Solano County line. I-80 is the primary interregional commute corridor through West County, and has major regional significance to the Bay Area. I-80 is an eight- to twelve-lane freeway with a posted speed limit of 65 miles per hour (mph). The north-south freeway connects Hercules with nearby cities, such as Richmond and Vallejo, and regional destinations, such as San Francisco and Sacramento. It also provides access to the greater freeway network with direct connections to Interstate 580, Interstate 680, Interstate 780, State Route 4, State Route 29, and State Route 37.

San Pablo Avenue. From the Alameda County line to I-80/Pomona Street in Crockett. San Pablo Avenue is the most important corridor for inter-city travel in West County: it is the primary transit spine of the region, it travels through all of the West County cities (in many cases, functioning as “Main Street”), and it is the primary reliever route to I-80 during periods of severe freeway congestion. San Pablo is a four-lane major arterial that runs generally east-west in the immediate project vicinity with a posted speed limit of 25-40 mph. On-street parking is prohibited, and intermittent sidewalks are provided along particular sections of the corridor. This roadway is also designated as a Route of Regional Significance by the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority (CCTA). Routes of Regional Significance are the most important streets in the County as designated by CCTA.

Skelly is a two-lane, east-west to north-south meandering street with a posted speed of 25 mph, which changes designation at Hercules Avenue. North of Hercules Avenue, Skelly becomes “Zeus,” a local street that provides access to the Olympic Hills HOA. South of Hercules Avenue, Skelly is a local street. On-street parking is permitted south of Hercules Avenue.

Hercules Avenue is a four-lane, generally north-south collector with a posted speed of 25 mph. Hercules Avenue extends from O’Neill Circle in the north to Village Parkway in the south. Sidewalks are provided on both sides, and on-street parking is generally permitted north of San Pablo Avenue.

3.2 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Walkability is defined as the ability to travel easily and safely between various origins and destinations without having to rely on automobiles or other motorized travel. The ideal “walkable” community includes wide sidewalks, a mix of land uses such as residential, employment, and shopping opportunities, a limited number of conflict points with vehicle traffic, and easy access to transit facilities and services. 1627
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 13
Pedestrian facilities consist of crosswalks, sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and off-street paths, which provide safe and convenient routes for pedestrians to access the destinations such as institutions, businesses, public transportation, and recreation facilities.

In the project vicinity, the study intersection which is signalized is equipped with pedestrian signal heads and cross walks. A crosswalk is present on the southeast leg of the unsignalized intersection along Hercules Avenue at the crossing of Skelly. There are continuous sidewalks present on Hercules Avenue and Skelly. Sidewalks are present in most sections, but not continuous, on portions of San Pablo Avenue.

There is a gap in the sidewalk on the both sides San Pablo Avenue between the eastbound pedestrian pathway outlet south of the project site and the westbound pedestrian pathway outlet which terminates near Charles Avenue on San Pablo Avenue. The existing asphalt concrete pathways along the south side of the project site function as sidewalks along much of their length but may include sloping sections that reduce accessibility. Most nearby bus stops are accessible from the project site via existing sidewalks and crosswalks within the vicinity of the project site. The existing pedestrian facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 3.
1628
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 14
Figure 3: Existing Pedestrian Facilities
1629
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 15

3.3 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
Bicycle paths, lanes and routes are typical examples of bicycle transportation facilities, which are defined by Caltrans as being in one of the following three classes:

1. Class I Multiuse Trail – a completely separated facility designed for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with crossing points minimized.

2. Class II Bike Lane –a designated lane for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and cross-flows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.

3. Class III Bike Route –a route designated by signs or pavement markings and shared with pedestrians and motorists.

4. Class IV Separated Bikeway – an on-street facility reserved for use by bicyclists, with physical separation between the bikeway and travel lanes. Physical separation consists of vertical elements that may include curbs, landscaping, bollards, or parking lanes.

There are existing Class II bike lanes provided on San Pablo Avenue east of Hercules Avenue; an extension of the Class II bike lane is proposed in the Hercules 2018 General Plan Circulation Element. A multi-use trail is present along Pinole Creek to the west of the project site. The existing and proposed bicycle facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 4.
1630
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 16
Figure 4: Existing Bicycle Facilities
1631
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 17

3.4 EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES
Existing transit service to the project is provided by the Western Contra Costa Transit Authority (WestCAT) and the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART). Such services are described below. It should be noted that the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in substantially decreased transit demand throughout the region, leading to reduced service hours and frequency across multiple transit agencies. It is expected that service hours and frequency will be expanded when transit demand returns to more typical levels.

WestCAT – WestCAT provides bus service to various communities in West Contra Costa County including Hercules. It operates local, express, and regional bus lines as well as the Lynx transbay service. In the immediate vicinity of the proposed project, Bus Routes #J, #JPX, #C3, and #19, provide service to the project site and vicinity. Table 3 summarizes existing bus service in the project vicinity.

BART - BART provides passenger service within the metropolitan Bay Area. BART currently has five main operating lines: Antioch-SFO/Millbrae, Dublin/Pleasanton-Daly City, Berryessa/North San Jose-Richmond, Berryessa/North San Jose-Daly City, and Richmond-Millbrae There are also connectors to Oakland International Airport (OAK) and San Francisco International Airport (SFO). BART operates between 5:00 a.m. and 9:00 on weekdays and between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on weekends. During the a.m. and p.m. peak commute periods, train service runs at 15-minute intervals to each destination. The closest BART station is located in El Cerrito del Norte on the east side of San Pablo Avenue near County Center.

The existing transit facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 5.

Table 3: Existing Bus Services
Route
#
From To
Weekdays Weekend
Operating
Hours
Headway
(minutes)
Operating
Hours
Headway
(minutes)
J
Hercules
Transit Center El Cerrito BART 4:24 a.m. –11:33 p.m.
36 7:10 a.m. –
9:15 p.m. 45
JPX Hercules
Transit Center El Cerrito BART 5:14 am. –8:46 p.m.
26 … …
C3 Hercules
Transit Center
Contra Costa
College
7:06 a.m. –
8:01 p.m.
20 … …
19 Hercules
Transit Center Hilltop Mall … …
8:59 a.m. –
9:00 p.m. 13
Source: WestCAT website https://www.westcat.org/home/SchedSysMap accessed February 8, 2022 1632
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 18
Figure 5: Existing Transit Facilities
1633
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 19

3.5 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
TJKM evaluated existing traffic conditions at two study intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours on a typical weekday. Intersection turning movement counts of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians were collected during weekday a.m. peak period (7:00-9:00 a.m.) and p.m. peak period (4:00-6:00 p.m.) on January 13, 2022.

Due to ongoing traffic irregularities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, historical counts at one intersection were used as a basis of adjusting new turning movement volumes to estimated typical volumes. The adjusted volumes were then used as the basis for analyzing Existing Conditions. The most recent historical counts in the study area were collected in 2016 at Hercules & San Pablo Avenue, as part of the DEIR for the 2018 update to the Circulation Element of the Hercules General Plan. For the a.m. peak hour, 2022 volumes were increased by 24.8 percent to match total volumes in 2016. For the p.m. peak hour, 2020 volumes were increased by 42.7 percent.

The traffic count data are included in Appendix A. The existing lane geometries and traffic control at each study intersection are illustrated on Figure 6 and intersection turning movement volumes at each study intersection are illustrated on Figure 7.
1634
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 20
Figure 6: Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls
1635
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 21

3.6 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING CONDITIONS This scenario evaluates the study intersections based on existing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic controls, as described above. The peak hour factors calculated from the existing turning movement counts were used for the study intersections for the Existing Conditions analysis. The results of the LOS analysis using the HCM 6th Edition methodology and Synchro 10 software program for Existing Conditions are summarized in Table 4. Field verification of existing intersections, lane configurations, and traffic controls were also conducted remotely and provided the basis for the LOS analysis for Existing Conditions.

Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during the a.m. peak hour, and both study intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue & San Pablo Avenue operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The unsignalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly/Zeus operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour. It should be noted that at this intersection, the southbound approach on Zeus experiences higher delay than the northbound approach on Skelly during both peak hours. The northbound approach experiences 9.6 seconds of delay in both peak hours. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B.

Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control Peak Hour
Existing Conditions
Average Delay¹ LOS²
1 Hercules Ave & Skelly/Zeus Two-Way
Stop Control
AM 12.4 B (SB)
PM 13.4 B (SB)
2 Hercules Ave & San Pablo Avenue Signal AM 24.1 C
PM 25.0 C
Notes:

AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour

1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.

2. LOS = Level of Service
* CMP intersections with LOS E threshold
Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. 1636
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 22
Figure 7: Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1637
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 23

4.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This analysis scenario presents the impacts of the proposed project at the study intersections and surrounding roadway system. This scenario is identical to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed project. The project would replace an existing horse ranch property with 40 single family homes.

4.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
As noted in section 2.1, the proposed project was evaluated using screening criteria adopted by CCTA, based on existing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) generated in the project area. For projects in areas with a similar mix of existing uses, residential projects are screened out if the home-based VMT per resident is at least 15 percent below the countywide average.

It should be noted that the CCTA travel demand model year 2020 is a simulation, based on data collected prior to the most recent decennial model update in 2016. The 2020 simulated baseline traffic conditions are therefore unaffected by actual pandemic-related traffic disruptions that occurred in 2020.

VMT Generated Per resident
The proposed project would construct 40 new single family homes on a site surrounded by similar lowdensity single family residential developments. The CCTA travel demand model generates simulated daily weekday VMT per capita by traffic analysis zone (TAZ) within Contra Costa County and throughout the Bay Area, for commute VMT per employee and residential VMT per capita. The project site is within the boundaries of an existing TAZ (#10236) that contains similar single family residential subdivisions under existing conditions. As shown in Table 5, the residential VMT per capita generated in this TAZ is 14.45. A map showing TAZ boundaries is included in Appendix C.

For the year 2020, the countywide residential VMT per capita generated by the CCTA travel demand model is 19.78. The corresponding threshold to consider a location to have low VMT, 15 percent below the countywide average, is 16.81. There is no apparent evidence that the project would generate more VMT than the surrounding area. Based on the CCTA screening criteria, the proposed project is expected to cause a less-than-significant impact under CEQA and is exempt from further VMT analysis.

Table 5: Year 2020 VMT Generation
TAZ # Description Population
Total Residential
VMT
Residential VMT
per Capita
10236
North of San Pablo Ave., between Hercules
Ave and Pinole Creek
1,036 8,288 14.45
Notes:

Source: CCTA travel demand model, baseline year 2020, Kittelson & Associates (2016)

4.2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
TJKM developed estimated project trip generation for the proposed project based on published trip generation rates from the ITE publication Trip Generation (11th Edition). TJKM used published trip rates for 1638
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 24
the ITE land use Single Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210) for this project. The proposed project is expected to generate 377 total daily trips, including 28 net new a.m. peak hour trips (7 in, 21 out) and 38 net new p.m. peak hour trips (24 in, 14 out).

Table 6 shows the trips expected to be generated by the proposed project.

Table 6: Project Trip Generation
Land Use2 Size2
Daily AM Peak PM Peak
Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Proposed Uses
Single-Family Detached
Housing (210) 40 DU 9.43 377 0.70 26:74 7 21 28 0.94 63:37 24 14 38 Total 337 7 21 28 24 14 38
Notes:

1. Trip Generation, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 2017

2. DU: dwelling unit

4.3 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Trip distribution is a process that determines in what proportion vehicles would be expected to travel between the project site and various destinations outside the project study area. Assignment determines the various routes that vehicles would take from the project site to each destination using the calculated trip distribution. Trip distribution assumptions for the proposed development project were developed based on the existing travel patterns and TJKM’s knowledge of the study area. The distribution assumptions for the proposed project are as follows:

It should be noted that, the distribution of those trips is approximate. The distribution assumptions applied to the existing use are as follows:
 60 percent to/from San Pablo Avenue West, to Richmond Parkway  40 percent to/from San Pablo Avenue East, to I-80 and SR-4 Figure 8 illustrates the trip distribution and trip assignment at the study intersections. The project trips were then added to traffic volumes under Existing Conditions to generate Existing plus Project Conditions traffic volumes.
1639
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 25
Figure 8: Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
1640
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 26

4.4 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions The intersection LOS analysis results for Existing plus Project Conditions are summarized in Table 6.

Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during the a.m. peak hour, and both study intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly/Zeus operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour with an increased delay of 0.8 seconds, and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour with an increased delay of 1.8 seconds. It should be noted that at this intersection, the southbound approach on Zeus would continue to experience higher delay than the northbound approach on Skelly during both peak hours. The northbound approach would experience 9.8 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour, an increase of 0.2 seconds, and 9.5 seconds of delay in the p.m. peak hour, a decrease of 0.1 seconds. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C with an increased delay of 0.6 seconds during both peak hours. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.

Figure 9 shows projected turning movement volumes at both of the study intersections for Existing plus Project Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

Table 7: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing
Conditions
Existing plus
Project Conditions
Average
Delay¹ LOS² Average Delay¹ LOS² Change in Delay3
1 Hercules Ave & Skelly/Zeus Two-Way
Stop Control
AM 12.4 B 13.2 B (SB) 0.8
PM 13.4 B 15.2 C (SB) 1.8
2 Hercules Ave & San Pablo
Avenue Signal AM 24.1 C 24.7 C 0.6
PM 25.0 C 25.6 C 0.6
Notes: AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour, Weekend – Saturday noon peak hour, Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. Red indicates significant impact.

1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.

2. LOS = Level of Service

3. Change in average delay between Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions. Average delay may be reduced with the addition of project traffic to non-critical movements.

4. Change in critical volume to capacity ratio between Existing and Existing plus Project Condition * CMP intersections with LOS E threshold.

4.5 INTERSECTION QUEUING ANALYSIS
The 95th percentile queue lengths were calculated at the signalized study intersection under Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions. The project would add trips to dedicated left- and right-turn lanes at the intersection with dedicated turn lanes, Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue. Table 8 details the existing traffic volumes, added project trips, and queue lengths at all dedicated turn lanes at the signalized study intersection. For locations with dual turn lanes providing varying amounts of storage, the average storage length is provided. The 95th percentile queue lengths are rounded to the nearest five feet 1641
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 27
and assume an average vehicle length of 25 feet. Queue lengths are averaged among all lanes within a lane group.

Under Existing Conditions, the intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would experience queue overflows in the eastbound left turn lane during PM peak hours, and in the southbound left turn lane during all peak hours, during one or both peak hours. Under Existing plus Project Conditions, the same turn lanes would continue to experience overflows during the same peak hours, with some increases in queue lengths. The addition of project trips would not cause any new queue overflows but would increase existing overflows in the Eastbound Left turn lane and the Southbound Left turn lane. Queuing worksheets for each scenario are provided in Appendix B and Appendix D.

Table 8. 95th Percentile Queue Lengths at Selected Turn Lanes:

Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions
Existing
Conditions
Existing plus
Project Conditions
ID Study Intersection Lane
Group
Storage
Length
Peak
Hour
Existing
Volume
Net
Project
Trips
Queue
Length
Queue
Length
Change
in Queue
2 Hercules Ave & San
Pablo Avenue
Eastbound
Left 155 AM 87 4 120 123 5
PM 178 14 175 195 20
Eastbound
Right 160 AM 55 0 0 0 0
PM 201 0 60 60 0
Westbound
Left 300 AM
PM
84 137
0 0
100
180
100
185
0 5
Westbound
Right 165 AM
PM
126
157
3 10
35 20
40 25
5 5
Southbound
Left 90 AM
PM
166
106
8 6
125
100
130
100
5 0
Notes:
95th percentile queue lengths expressed in feet, rounded to the nearest five feet * Average storage per lane, where dual turn lanes provide different storage lengths Bold indicates queue length exceeds storage capacity
Red indicates queue length increases by more than one vehicle length 1642
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 28
Figure 9: Existing plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1643
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 29

5.0 CUMULATIVE NO-PROJECT CONDITIONS (2040)
The Cumulative No-Project Conditions analysis forecasts how the study area’s transportation system would operate with the growth and changes of the surrounding community by the year 2040. Corridor volumes on Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue in the immediate project vicinity were obtained from baseline year 2018 and horizon year 2040 in the CCTA traffic model. Based on the growth in these corridor volumes, an annual compounding linear growth rate of 0.82% was applied to adjusted Existing Conditions to project future 2040 traffic volumes.

Figure 10 shows projected turning movement volumes at the study intersections for Cumulative Conditions for a.m. and p.m. peak hours.

5.1 INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – CUMULATIVE NO-PROJECT CONDITIONS The intersection LOS analysis results for Cumulative No-Project Conditions are summarized in Table 12.

Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The unsignalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour, with a greater average delay in the southbound direction. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix E.

Table 12: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control Peak Hour
Cumulative Conditions
Average Delay¹ LOS²
1 Hercules Ave and Skelly/Zeus Two-Way Stop
Control
AM 13.5 B (SB)
PM 14.9 B (SB)
2 Hercules Ave and San Pablo
Ave Signal AM 31.7 C
PM 34.3 C
Notes:

AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour

1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.

2. LOS = Level of Service
* CMP intersections with LOS E threshold
Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. 1644
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 30
Figure 10: Cumulative No-Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1645
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 31

6.0 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This scenario is identical to Cumulative No-Project Conditions, but with the addition of projected traffic from the proposed project. Trip generation, distribution, and assignment for the proposed project are identical to that assumed under Existing plus Project Conditions.

6.1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS The intersection LOS analysis results for Cumulative plus Project Conditions are summarized in Table 13.

Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour, with an increase in average delay, and degrade to LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. The unsignalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour with a 1-second increase in average delay, and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour with a 2.2-second delay increase, with worse conditions in the southbound direction. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.

Figure 13 shows projected turning movement volumes at all the study intersections for Cumulative plus Project Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix F.

Table 13: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control
Peak
Hour
Cumulative
Conditions
Cumulative plus
Project Conditions
Average
Delay¹ LOS² Average Delay¹ LOS² Change in Delay3
1 Hercules Ave and Skelly/Zeus Two-Way Stop
Controlled
AM 13.5 B (SB) 14.5 B (SB) 1.0
PM 14.9 B (SB) 17.1 C (SB) 2.2
2 Hercules Ave and San Pablo
Ave Signal AM 31.7 C 32.7 C 1.0
PM 34.3 C 35.2 D 0.9
Notes: AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour, Weekend – Saturday noon peak hour, Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. Red indicates significant impact.

1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.

2. LOS = Level of Service

3. Change in average delay between Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions. Average delay may be reduced with the addition of project traffic to non-critical movements.

4. Change in critical volume to capacity ratio between Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions * CMP intersections with LOS E threshold.
1646
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 32
Figure 11: Cumulative plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1647
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 33

7.0 ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS
The following sections provide additional analyses of other transportation issues associated with the project site, including:
 Site access and impacts
 On-site circulation
 Parking analysis
 Recommendations
The analyses in these sections are based on professional judgment in accordance with the standards and methods employed by traffic engineers. Although operational issues are not considered CEQA impacts, they do describe traffic conditions that are relevant to describing the project environment.

7.1 SITE ACCESS
This section analyzes site access for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles based on the site plan presented in Figure 2 (dated November, 2021).

Vehicle Access
Primary access to the project site would be provided by a direct connection to Skelly at the location of the existing driveway. TJKM recommends that the grading plans for the site be carefully evaluated to ensure that the finished grade and landscaping do not create any visual obstructions for vehicles exiting the driveway. Vehicle access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby roadways.

Pedestrian Access
Pedestrian access would be via internal sidewalks connecting to existing sidewalks on Skelly, and via a pedestrian trail to the south of the project site connecting Skelly to San Pablo Avenue. There is one crosswalk at the intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly, and there are 4-way signalized crosswalks at the intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue. Existing pedestrian facilities provide continuous paths to nearby bus stops on San Pablo Avenue and to nearby shopping centers to the southwest of the project site, primarily via trail access. However, as shown in Figure 3, existing sidewalk facilities on San Pablo Avenue to the southwest of the project site terminate between the two pedestrian trail outlets to San Pablo Avenue. This disruption separates pedestrians from nearby shopping centers west of Pinole Creek when travelling along San Pablo Avenue, and may pose accessibility challenges due to the slope of the trail at some points.

A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to pedestrians facilities or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of pedestrian facilities. The proposed project will not result in any such conflicts. Pedestrian access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby pedestrian facilities. 1648
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 34
Bicycle Access
There are existing Class II bike lanes provided on San Pablo Avenue east of Hercules Avenue; an extension of the Class II bike lane is proposed in the Hercules 2018 General Plan Circulation Element. A multi-use trail is present along Pinole Creek to the west of the project site.

An impact to bicyclists occurs if the proposed project disrupt existing bicycle facilities; or conflict or create inconsistencies with adopted bicycle system plans, guidelines, and policies. A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to bicycle facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of bicycle facilities. The proposed project will not result in any such conflicts. Bicycle access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby bicycle facilities.

Transit
A proposed project is considered to have a significant impact on transit if it conflicts with existing or planned transit facilities, or is expected to generate additional transit trips and does not provide adequate facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists to access transit routes and stops. The project site is adequately served by the transit service, as shown in Figure 5. Transit stops on San Pablo Avenue are within a onehalf mile walk from the project site. Spread among multiple bus routes, the existing transit service can accommodate the proposed demand. Therefore, transit access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby transit network.

9.2 ON-SITE CIRCULATION
This section analyzes internal circulation based on the site plan presented in Figure 2 (dated November, 2021).

As shown in Figure 2, the street connecting all homes forms a loop, with westward extension in line with the access point from Skelly providing garage access to four homes. The street is 34-45 feet wide throughout, including sidewalks and on-street parking spaces. There is adequate space for vehicles to maneuver into and out of parking spaces and garages. The project would also provide adequate space for trucks and emergency vehicles to access the site and maneuver as needed, with adequate turning radii for truck access. There are no curb ramps or interior pedestrian crossings within the access loop. In order to ensure accessible pedestrian circulation between all homes and the nearest roadways, at least two curb ramps should be included on the inner side of the loop opposite new ramps on the outer edge of the loop, and a pair of ramps should be added near the connection point to Skelly. On-site circulation for vehicles is considered adequate, but pedestrian circulation could be improved with additional curb ramps.

9.3 PARKING
Under the City of Hercules zoning regulations, the proposed project, consisting of single family residential homes, would be classified as single family residential. The City of Hercules requires 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit (per Article 84-4.12); the proposed project provides 2 covered parking spaces and 2 uncovered parking spaces per unit, with additional overflow parking within the access loop. 1649
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 35
As shown in the site plan dated November, 2021 (Figure 2), the proposed project will construct 40 new dwelling units. The project would require 80 parking spaces for the main dwelling units. The proposed project would construct two-car garages with driveway aprons for each dwelling unit, providing 80 covered spaces, exceeding City requirements, as well as 40 uncovered spaces. The development would also provide 4 parallel on-street parking spaces. All on-street spaces would be marked and contained within the project site, on the private street shared by the planned development and within close proximity to the homes. The proposed parking supply would therefore be more than adequate under City of Hercules requirements and would not produce any parking impacts on surrounding parcels or roadways.

9.4 RECOMMENDATIONS
TJKM recommends the following:
 The grading plans for the site should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the finished grade and landscaping do not create any visual obstructions for vehicles exiting driveways.  Add curb ramps to provide accessible crossings of loop road near Skelly and the pedestrian path to San Pablo Avenue.
1650
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix A – Existing Turning Movement Counts
1651
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080016-001 Day:

City: Hercules Date:

AM 1 0 33 1 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 1 0 21 0 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0100 0 30 0 22
1 132 0 84
000 00 807
103 0 TEV 288 0 276 0 100
130 0 68 1 PHF 0.92 0.79
102 0 0010

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0118 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0008 AM
0 NONE
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm 34
Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Skelly/Zeus Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/13/2022

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:45 am - 08:45 am 24 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
98 0 171
Cars (AM) 10 HT (AM)
Hercules Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
Hercules Ave
85 0 134

CONTROL
2-Way Stop(NB/SB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 8

NORTHBOUND
Skelly/Zeus
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
1 0
0 0
0 0
20 130
0 2
0 0
1 0
0 40 520 5
1 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
2 1
0 0
3 0
001
000
29 132
2 8
68 3
1021
118
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
20 83
1 7
127
1 1032
008
1652
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 2 6 0 0 29
7:15 AM 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 1 10 4 0 54
7:30 AM 0 0 4 0 11 0 2 0 1 27 0 0 0 9 6 0 60
7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 8 0 1 0 0 47 0 0 1 13 7 0 78
8:00 AM 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 20 11 0 71
8:15 AM 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 1 33 0 0 4 28 0 0 77
8:30 AM 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 24 1 0 2 23 4 0 62
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 2 21 1 0 55

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 20 1 58 0 3 1 2 225 1 0 12 130 33 0 486 APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 95.24% 4.76% 93.55% 0.00% 4.84% 1.61% 0.88% 98.68% 0.44% 0.00% 6.86% 74.29% 18.86% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 8 0 33 0 1 1 1 130 1 0 7 84 22 0 288
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.667 0.000 0.688 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.691 0.250 0.000 0.438 0.750 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 21 1 0 2 48 9 0 87
4:15 PM 1 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 2 22 6 0 54
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 8 0 1 0 1 17 0 0 1 25 9 0 64
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 3 37 6 1 71
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 2 31 6 0 62
5:15 PM 0 0 3 0 6 0 2 1 0 19 0 0 1 29 9 1 71
5:30 PM 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 1 26 1 0 2 24 7 0 67
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 17 0 0 2 25 3 0 52

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 1 1 18 0 36 0 4 1 5 146 3 0 15 241 55 2 528 APPROACH %'s : 5.00% 5.00% 90.00% 0.00% 87.80% 0.00% 9.76% 2.44% 3.25% 94.81% 1.95% 0.00% 4.79% 77.00% 17.57% 0.64% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 1 8 0 21 0 1 0 3 68 2 0 8 132 30 1 276
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250 0.667 0.000 0.656 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.810 0.500 0.000 0.667 0.688 0.833 0.250 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
Data - Total
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
07:45 am - 08:45 am

0.923 0.667 0.729 0.702 0.883

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm

0.793 0.500 0.611 0.830 0.725
1653
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 2 5 0 0 26
7:15 AM 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 1 9 4 0 53
7:30 AM 0 0 4 0 11 0 2 0 1 26 0 0 0 9 4 0 57
7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 8 0 1 0 0 45 0 0 1 12 6 0 74
8:00 AM 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 20 10 0 70
8:15 AM 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 1 32 0 0 4 28 0 0 75
8:30 AM 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 24 1 0 2 23 4 0 62
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 2 21 1 0 55

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 20 0 57 0 3 1 2 220 1 0 12 127 29 0 472 APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 93.44% 0.00% 4.92% 1.64% 0.90% 98.65% 0.45% 0.00% 7.14% 75.60% 17.26% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 8 0 32 0 1 1 1 127 1 0 7 83 20 0 281
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.667 0.000 0.667 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.706 0.250 0.000 0.438 0.741 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 21 1 0 2 48 9 0 87
4:15 PM 1 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 2 22 5 0 53
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 8 0 1 0 1 17 0 0 1 25 9 0 64
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 3 37 6 1 71
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 2 31 6 0 61
5:15 PM 0 0 3 0 6 0 2 1 0 19 0 0 1 29 9 1 71
5:30 PM 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 1 26 1 0 2 24 7 0 67
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 17 0 0 2 25 3 0 52

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 1 1 18 0 35 0 4 1 5 146 3 0 15 241 54 2 526 APPROACH %'s : 5.00% 5.00% 90.00% 0.00% 87.50% 0.00% 10.00% 2.50% 3.25% 94.81% 1.95% 0.00% 4.81% 77.24% 17.31% 0.64% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 1 8 0 21 0 1 0 3 68 2 0 8 132 29 1 275
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250 0.667 0.000 0.656 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.810 0.500 0.000 0.667 0.688 0.806 0.250 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm

0.790 0.500 0.611 0.830 0.720
07:45 am - 08:45 am

0.937

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.667 0.708 0.717 0.859

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Cars
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
1654
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0001000001000100 3
7:15 AM 0000000000000100 1
7:30 AM 0000000001000020 3
7:45 AM 0000000002000110 4
8:00 AM 0000000000000010 1
8:15 AM 0000100001000000 2
8:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 AM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 4 0 14
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 42.86% 57.14% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00001000030001207
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:15 PM 0000000000000010 1
4:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:00 PM 0000100000000000 1
5:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:45 PM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00001000000000102
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000101
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm

0.250 0.250
07:45 am - 08:45 am

0.438

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.250 0.375 0.375

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - HT
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
1655
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 AM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000000000000
APPROACH %'s :

PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000000
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:45 PM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000000000000
APPROACH %'s :

PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000000
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm
07:45 am - 08:45 am

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
1656
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning
Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave Project ID:

City: Hercules Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 00000000 0
7:15 AM 00120000 3
7:30 AM 10200000 3
7:45 AM 21120000 6
8:00 AM 10010000 2
8:15 AM 11000000 2
8:30 AM 10000000 1
8:45 AM 00000010 1

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 6 2 4 5 0 0 1 018
APPROACH %'s : 75.00% 25.00% 44.44% 55.56% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 39 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 5 2 1 3 0 0 0 011
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.625 0.500 0.250 0.375
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 12001000 4
4:15 PM 11201100 6
4:30 PM 10000000 1
4:45 PM 12000001 4
5:00 PM 12000000 3
5:15 PM 00100000 1
5:30 PM 21000000 3
5:45 PM 10000000 1

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 8 8 3 0 2 1 0 123
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00% 100.00% 0.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 100.00% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 286 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 4 5 2 0 2 1 0 115
PEAK HR FACTOR : 1.000 0.625 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250
22-080016-001
1/13/2022

0.625 0.750 0.250 0.375 0.250
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm

0.458 0.583

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

0.333
07:45 am - 08:45 am

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
1657
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080016-002 Day:

City: Hercules Date:

AM 125 2 133 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 88 10 71 3 PM

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1110 1 110 0 101
2 346 0 596
003 01 95 0 65
70 0 122 1 TEV 1743 0 1867 0 102
353 0 710 2 PHF 0.93 0.92
44 0 141 1 0 1 0.5 0.5

AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 70 13 83 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 110 5 137 AM
0 NONE
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm 248
Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Hercules Ave Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/13/2022

PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:45 am - 08:45 am 176 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM

COUNT PERIODS
NONE
865 0 625
Cars (AM) 247 HT (AM)
San Pablo Ave

EASTBOUND

WESTBOUND
San Pablo Ave
831 0 507

CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 111

NORTHBOUND
Hercules Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)

AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM

PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
1 1
0 3
00 000
0 4
0 2
3 0
2 20 130 1
0 9
1 0
12 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
2 29
1 1
14 1
203
201
110
337
140 95
698
122
881071
701383
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
99 567
43 64
339
69 1232130
1085136
1658
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 18 0 22 0 16 0 23 0 5 34 0 0 4 69 6 0 197
7:15 AM 24 1 16 0 16 1 36 0 12 46 11 0 6 132 10 0 311
7:30 AM 28 1 18 0 31 0 32 0 10 53 4 0 13 124 61 321
7:45 AM 34 1 31 0 37 2 43 0 15 109 9 0 12 157 17 1 468
8:00 AM 25 2 48 0 41 0 25 0 19 81 5 0 7 144 24 0 421
8:15 AM 28 2 33 0 38 0 32 0 18 98 15 0 13 147 30 0 454
8:30 AM 23 0 25 0 17 0 25 0 18 65 15 0 33 148 30 1 400
8:45 AM 21 1 15 0 21 0 35 0 14 70 12 1 12 88 21 0 311

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 201 8 208 0 217 3 251 0 111 556 71 1 100 1009 144 3 2883 APPROACH %'s : 48.20% 1.92% 49.88% 0.00% 46.07% 0.64% 53.29% 0.00% 15.02% 75.24% 9.61% 0.14% 7.96% 80.33% 11.46% 0.24% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 110 5 137 0 133 2 125 0 70 353 44 0 65 596 101 2 1743 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.809 0.625 0.714 0.000 0.811 0.250 0.727 0.000 0.921 0.810 0.733 0.000 0.492 0.949 0.842 0.500 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 10 1 11 0 17 1 19 0 45 177 19 0 26 97 25 0 448
4:15 PM 14 0 12 0 18 1 14 0 26 151 27 0 29 90 24 0 406
4:30 PM 20 2 11 0 12 2 23 0 31 196 28 1 18 79 22 0 445
4:45 PM 10 7 19 0 14 1 20 2 34 164 35 2 19 94 27 0 448
5:00 PM 17 2 20 0 20 3 16 1 29 177 26 1 28 73 25 0 438
5:15 PM 22 3 23 0 17 5 21 0 30 204 34 0 33 81 36 1 510
5:30 PM 21 1 21 1 20 1 31 0 29 165 46 0 15 98 22 0 471
5:45 PM 8 0 19 0 20 1 12 0 32 166 41 0 23 84 17 0 423

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 122 16 136 1 138 15 156 3 256 1400 256 4 191 696 198 1 3589 APPROACH %'s : 44.36% 5.82% 49.45% 0.36% 44.23% 4.81% 50.00% 0.96% 13.36% 73.07% 13.36% 0.21% 17.59% 64.09% 18.23% 0.09% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 70 13 83 1 71 10 88 3 122 710 141 3 95 346 110 1 1867 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.795 0.464 0.902 0.250 0.888 0.500 0.710 0.375 0.897 0.870 0.766 0.375 0.720 0.883 0.764 0.250 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
Data - Total
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
07:45 am - 08:45 am

0.931 0.840 0.793 0.878 0.901

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm

0.915 0.870 0.827 0.910 0.914
1659
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 17 0 22 0 16 0 23 0 4 30 0 0 4 65 6 0 187
7:15 AM 24 1 16 0 16 1 35 0 12 41 11 0 6 129 9 0 301
7:30 AM 28 1 18 0 31 0 32 0 9 47 4 0 13 119 5 1 308
7:45 AM 34 1 30 0 35 2 42 0 14 104 9 0 11 153 16 1 452
8:00 AM 25 2 48 0 41 0 25 0 19 76 5 0 7 131 23 0 402
8:15 AM 27 2 33 0 38 0 31 0 18 95 14 0 13 141 30 0 442
8:30 AM 22 0 25 0 16 0 25 0 18 64 15 0 33 142 30 1 391
8:45 AM 21 1 15 0 21 0 34 0 14 64 12 1 12 78 20 0 293

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 198 8 207 0 214 3 247 0 108 521 70 1 99 958 139 3 2776 APPROACH %'s : 47.94% 1.94% 50.12% 0.00% 46.12% 0.65% 53.23% 0.00% 15.43% 74.43% 10.00% 0.14% 8.26% 79.90% 11.59% 0.25% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 108 5 136 0 130 2 123 0 69 339 43 0 64 567 99 2 1687 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.794 0.625 0.708 0.000 0.793 0.250 0.732 0.000 0.908 0.815 0.717 0.000 0.485 0.926 0.825 0.500 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 10 1 11 0 17 1 19 0 45 173 19 0 26 94 25 0 441
4:15 PM 14 0 12 0 18 1 14 0 26 145 27 0 29 85 23 0 394
4:30 PM 20 2 11 0 12 2 23 0 31 193 28 1 18 75 22 0 438
4:45 PM 10 7 19 0 14 1 20 2 34 159 34 2 19 90 27 0 438
5:00 PM 17 2 20 0 20 3 16 1 29 175 26 1 28 71 25 0 434
5:15 PM 22 3 23 0 17 5 21 0 30 201 34 0 33 79 36 1 505
5:30 PM 21 1 21 1 20 1 31 0 29 163 46 0 15 97 22 0 468
5:45 PM 8 0 19 0 19 1 12 0 32 163 41 0 21 82 17 0 415

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 122 16 136 1 137 15 156 3 256 1372 255 4 189 673 197 1 3533 APPROACH %'s : 44.36% 5.82% 49.45% 0.36% 44.05% 4.82% 50.16% 0.96% 13.57% 72.71% 13.51% 0.21% 17.83% 63.49% 18.58% 0.09% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 70 13 83 1 71 10 88 3 122 698 140 3 95 337 110 1 1845 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.795 0.464 0.902 0.250 0.888 0.500 0.710 0.375 0.897 0.868 0.761 0.375 0.720 0.869 0.764 0.250 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm

0.913 0.870 0.827 0.908 0.911
07:45 am - 08:45 am

0.933

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.830 0.807 0.888 0.888

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Cars
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
1660
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 1000000014000400 10
7:15 AM 0000001005000310 10
7:30 AM 0000000016000510 13
7:45 AM 0010201015001410 16
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 13 1 0 19
8:15 AM 1000001003100600 12
8:30 AM 1000100001000600 9
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 10 1 0 18

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 3 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 35 1 0 1 51 5 0 107
APPROACH %'s : 75.00% 0.00% 25.00% 0.00% 42.86% 0.00% 57.14% 0.00% 7.69% 89.74% 2.56% 0.00% 1.75% 89.47% 8.77% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 2 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 1 14 1 0 1 29 2 0 56
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.250 0.700 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.558 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000004000300 7
4:15 PM 0000000006000510 12
4:30 PM 0000000003000400 7
4:45 PM 0000000005100400 10
5:00 PM 0000000002000200 4
5:15 PM 0000000003000200 5
5:30 PM 0000000002000100 3
5:45 PM 0000100003002200 8

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 28 1 0 2 23 1 0 56
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 96.55% 3.45% 0.00% 7.69% 88.46% 3.85% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 9 0 0 22
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.600 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.563 0.000 0.000 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm

0.550 0.542 0.563
07:45 am - 08:45 am

0.737

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.750 0.417 0.667 0.571

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - HT
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
1661
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:

Control: Signalized Date:

NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:15 AM 0000000003000000 3
7:30 AM 1000000000000000 1
7:45 AM 0100000000000000 1
8:00 AM 0000000000000100 1
8:15 AM 0000000001000000 1
8:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 AM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 11000000040001007
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 01000000010001003
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:15 PM 0000000000000010 1
4:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:45 PM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000000000101
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000000
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm
07:45 am - 08:45 am

0.750

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

0.250 0.250 0.250

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
1662
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning
Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave Project ID:

City: Hercules Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 01000010 2
7:15 AM 00030020 5
7:30 AM 10000020 3
7:45 AM 01000000 1
8:00 AM 00000001 1
8:15 AM 11002110 6
8:30 AM 01000120 4
8:45 AM 01000001 2

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 2 5 0 3 2 2 8 224
APPROACH %'s : 28.57% 71.43% 0.00% 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 80.00% 20.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 39 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 3 0 0 2 2 3 112
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.750 0.250 0.500 0.375 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 10003110 6
4:15 PM 01001000 2
4:30 PM 00012000 3
4:45 PM 10000100 2
5:00 PM 00003110 5
5:15 PM 00001100 2
5:30 PM 11000000 2
5:45 PM 00000000 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 3 2 0 110 4 2 022
APPROACH %'s : 60.00% 40.00% 0.00% 100.00% 71.43% 28.57% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 289 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 2 1 0 0 4 3 1 011
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.250 0.333 0.750 0.250
22-080016-002
1/13/2022

0.550 0.375 0.438 0.250
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm

0.500 0.500

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

0.333 0.500
07:45 am - 08:45 am

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
1663

SAN PABLO AVE SAN PABLO AVE HERCULES AVE HERCULES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 13 HERCULES AVE & SAN PABLO AVE AM
Date and Start Time: Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - All Vehicles
Traffic Counts
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk
Peak Hour: 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
379 108
1,026
719
79 308
462
1,269

0.96 N
S
W E

0.89 0.87

0.84 0.91
(662) (260)
(2,000)
(1,265)
(2,360)
(883)
(173) (513) 207
1 167
47 926
51 24
382
56 2
0 4
01364168

SAN PABLO AVE

SAN PABLO AVE

HERCULES AVE

HERCULES AVE
9 8
3 5
N
S
W E
4 4
0 3
7 2
1 4
Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrain Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 7:00 AM 0 12 63 5 0 7 243 11 0 38 1 24 0 37 1 38 480 2,131 2 1 0 2 7:15 AM 0 11 57 5 2 5 288 12 0 34 1 32 1 26 2 60 536 2,175 1 3 0 5 7:30 AM 0 15 97 8 0 9 252 4 0 34 0 33 0 37 1 59 549 2,133 2 1 1 0 7:45 AM 0 12 117 6 0 12 203 17 0 39 0 53 0 60 0 47 566 2,065 2 3 1 2 8:00 AM 0 18 111 5 0 25 183 14 0 29 3 50 0 44 1 41 524 1,927 0 1 0 2 8:15 AM 0 12 83 10 0 24 201 29 0 28 0 24 1 44 0 38 494 3 2 1 1 8:30 AM 1 22 87 8 1 23 223 21 0 19 0 21 0 23 0 32 481 2 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 21 91 6 1 10 159 21 0 27 1 22 0 25 0 44 428 5 1 0 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Lights 0 53 363 24 2 49 898 46 0 136 4 168 1 166 4 203 2,117 Mediums 0 3 17 0 0 2 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 54
Total 0 56 382 24 2 51 926 47 0 136 4 168 1 167 4 207 2,175 1664

SAN PABLO AVE SAN PABLO AVE HERCULES AVE HERCULES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 13 HERCULES AVE & SAN PABLO AVE PM
Date and Start Time: Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - All Vehicles
Traffic Counts
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk
Peak Hour: 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
156 320
721
1,454
240 142
1,646
651

0.91 N
S
W E

0.83 0.83

0.87 0.93
(296) (630)
(1,334)
(2,772)
(1,183)
(3,164)
(471) (262) 89
0 57
130
492
98 132
1,333
181
1 0
10 070963

SAN PABLO AVE

SAN PABLO AVE

HERCULES AVE

HERCULES AVE
9 13
0 4
N
S
W E
9 4
0 0
0 9
4 0
Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrain Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 49 258 28 0 16 91 19 0 7 2 23 0 8 1 19 521 2,475 2 5 1 1 4:15 PM 0 53 365 31 0 31 65 22 0 17 2 11 0 21 1 16 635 2,571 0 2 1 0 4:30 PM 0 47 357 31 0 25 115 25 0 16 2 11 0 20 4 25 678 2,665 1 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 46 324 25 0 23 99 39 0 23 1 17 0 16 4 24 641 2,637 1 6 0 0 5:00 PM 0 35 311 39 1 23 113 28 0 15 2 18 0 13 1 18 617 2,581 2 3 0 9 5:15 PM 0 53 341 37 0 27 165 38 0 16 4 17 0 8 1 22 729 0 3 0 0 5:30 PM 0 50 305 25 0 31 148 26 0 15 2 13 0 13 2 20 650 0 3 0 0 5:45 PM 3 59 267 25 1 39 98 26 0 13 0 15 0 18 1 20 585 1 4 0 1 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lights 0 178 1,316 132 1 98 473 129 0 69 9 63 0 56 10 88 2,622 Mediums 0 3 16 0 0 0 19 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 42
Total 0 181 1,333 132 1 98 492 130 0 70 9 63 0 57 10 89 2,665 1665
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix B – Existing Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
1666
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 7:00 am Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 9 105 27 0 0 10 42 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 9 105 27 0 0 10 42 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 04407000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 1 231 1 10 119 31 0 0 15 58 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 157 0 0 236 0 0 393 415 236 403 400 142 Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 - 162 162 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 155 177 - 241 238 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1423 - - 1331 - - 566 528 803 558 538 906 Stage 1 - - - - - - 765 708 - 840 764 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 847 753 - 762 708 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - 1326 - - 559 517 800 540 527 900 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 559 517 - 540 527 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 761 704 - 833 753 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 839 742 - 747 704 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.6 12.4

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 800 1414 - - 1326 - - 545
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 0.001 - - 0.008 - - 0.108
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 7.5 0 - 7.7 0 - 12.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.4
1667
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 7:00 am Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 87 440 55 84 744 126 137 6 171 166 2 156 Future Volume (veh/h) 87 440 55 84 744 126 137 6 171 166 2 156 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 500 62 93 827 140 163 7 204 210 3 197 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 127 1047 459 120 1032 448 210 10 277 273 409 345 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1559 1781 3554 1541 1781 52 1511 1781 1870 1576 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 500 62 93 827 140 163 0 211 210 3 197 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1559 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1576 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 6.9 1.7 3.1 12.8 4.2 5.3 0.0 7.6 6.8 0.1 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 6.9 1.7 3.1 12.8 4.2 5.3 0.0 7.6 6.8 0.1 6.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 127 1047 459 120 1032 448 210 0 287 273 409 345 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.48 0.14 0.78 0.80 0.31 0.78 0.00 0.74 0.77 0.01 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 164 1089 478 206 1173 508 445 0 492 537 686 578 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.3 17.3 15.5 27.4 19.6 16.5 25.6 0.0 23.0 24.3 18.2 20.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.4 0.3 0.1 10.3 3.6 0.4 6.0 0.0 3.7 4.5 0.0 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 2.5 0.6 1.5 5.1 1.3 2.5 0.0 2.9 3.1 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 17.6 15.6 37.7 23.2 16.9 31.6 0.0 26.7 28.8 18.3 22.3 LnGrp LOS D B B D C B C A C C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 661 1060 374 410
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.3 23.7 28.8 25.6
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.7 15.5 8.5 22.1 11.5 17.6 8.7 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 9.6 5.1 8.9 7.3 8.7 5.3 14.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.9 0.0 2.3 0.2 0.5 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1
HCM 6th LOS C
1668
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 4:00 pm Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 13 188 43 1 1 11 30 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 13 188 43 1 1 11 30 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 02209103301
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 5 117 4 18 258 59 2 2 22 49 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 326 0 0 123 0 0 457 493 124 477 466 298 Stage 1 - - - - - - 131 131 - 333 333 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 326 362 - 144 133 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 - - 1464 - - 514 477 927 498 494 741 Stage 1 - - - - - - 873 788 - 681 644 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 687 625 - 859 786 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1223 - - 1461 - - 504 463 923 472 479 734 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 504 463 - 472 479 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 868 783 - 672 629 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 675 610 - 831 781 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.4 9.6 13.4

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 809 1223 - - 1461 - - 477
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 0.004 - - 0.012 - - 0.107
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 8 0 - 7.5 0 - 13.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.4
1669
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 4:00 pm Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 178 1013 201 137 494 157 101 19 118 106 14 126 Future Volume (veh/h) 178 1013 201 137 494 157 101 19 118 106 14 126 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 196 1113 221 151 543 173 116 22 136 128 17 152 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 242 1329 584 189 1222 531 150 33 204 183 315 263 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1545 1781 220 1361 1781 1870 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 196 1113 221 151 543 173 116 0 158 128 17 152 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1545 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.2 19.2 6.9 5.6 8.0 5.6 4.3 0.0 6.4 4.7 0.5 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.2 19.2 6.9 5.6 8.0 5.6 4.3 0.0 6.4 4.7 0.5 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 242 1329 584 189 1222 531 150 0 237 183 315 263 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.84 0.38 0.80 0.44 0.33 0.77 0.00 0.67 0.70 0.05 0.58 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 363 1452 638 209 1222 531 328 0 437 476 673 563 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.2 19.2 15.4 29.4 17.1 16.3 30.2 0.0 27.0 29.2 23.5 25.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.0 4.2 0.4 17.9 0.3 0.4 8.1 0.0 3.2 4.8 0.1 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 7.6 2.2 3.1 2.9 1.8 2.1 0.0 2.5 2.2 0.2 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.3 23.4 15.8 47.3 17.4 16.7 38.2 0.0 30.2 34.0 23.6 27.8 LnGrp LOS D C B D B B D A CCCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 1530 867 274 297
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.9 22.4 33.6 30.2
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.4 14.6 11.6 29.7 10.2 15.8 13.7 27.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.7 8.4 7.6 21.2 6.3 8.0 9.2 10.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.6 0.0 3.9 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.0
HCM 6th LOS C
1670
Queues Timing Plan: AM Peak
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 7:00 am Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 500 63 93 827 140 163 211 210 3 197 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.43 0.10 0.49 0.76 0.25 0.54 0.58 0.60 0.01 0.50 Control Delay 51.5 20.5 0.3 38.9 26.9 5.3 31.4 12.3 30.9 23.5 9.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.5 20.5 0.3 38.9 26.9 5.3 31.4 12.3 30.9 23.5 9.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 78 0 33 141 0 56 2 71 1 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #118 147 0 #98 #288 37 111 47 123 7 33 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 156 1156 607 196 1120 583 423 615 511 655 675 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.43 0.10 0.47 0.74 0.24 0.39 0.34 0.41 0.00 0.29 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
1671
Queues Timing Plan: PM
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 4:00 pm Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 1113 221 151 543 173 116 158 128 17 152 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.47 0.26 0.49 0.55 0.50 0.06 0.39 Control Delay 40.0 27.2 6.0 60.5 22.4 2.3 36.8 16.2 35.5 28.6 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.0 27.2 6.0 60.5 22.4 2.3 36.8 16.2 35.5 28.6 6.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 217 10 65 98 0 47 9 52 7 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #176 #408 60 #182 174 19 100 57 98 22 24 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 340 1365 714 196 1157 661 307 515 446 632 650 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.47 0.26 0.38 0.31 0.29 0.03 0.23 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
1672
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix C – CCTA TAZ Boundaries
1673
1674
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix D – Existing plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
1675
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing plus Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 16 105 27 0 0 31 42 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 16 105 27 0 0 31 42 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 04407000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 1 231 1 18 119 31 0 0 46 58 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 157 0 0 236 0 0 409 431 236 435 416 142 Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 - 178 178 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 171 193 - 257 238 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1423 - - 1331 - - 553 517 803 531 527 906 Stage 1 - - - - - - 765 708 - 824 752 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 831 741 - 748 708 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - 1326 - - 544 503 800 491 513 900 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 544 503 - 491 513 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 761 704 - 817 735 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 817 725 - 704 704 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 9.8 13.2

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 800 1414 - - 1326 - - 496
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.001 - - 0.014 - - 0.119
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.5 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.4
1676
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing plus Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 91 440 55 84 744 129 137 6 171 174 2 169 Future Volume (veh/h) 91 440 55 84 744 129 137 6 171 174 2 169 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 500 62 93 827 143 163 7 204 220 3 214 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 132 1049 460 120 1024 444 210 9 276 282 417 352 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1559 1781 3554 1541 1781 52 1511 1781 1870 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 500 62 93 827 143 163 0 211 220 3 214 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1559 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1577 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 7.0 1.8 3.1 13.1 4.4 5.4 0.0 7.7 7.2 0.1 7.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 7.0 1.8 3.1 13.1 4.4 5.4 0.0 7.7 7.2 0.1 7.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 132 1049 460 120 1024 444 210 0 285 282 417 352 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.48 0.13 0.78 0.81 0.32 0.78 0.00 0.74 0.78 0.01 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 162 1072 470 203 1154 500 438 0 484 529 675 569 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.6 17.5 15.7 27.8 20.0 16.9 26.0 0.0 23.4 24.5 18.3 21.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.9 0.3 0.1 10.3 3.9 0.4 6.1 0.0 3.7 4.7 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 2.5 0.6 1.6 5.2 1.4 2.5 0.0 3.0 3.3 0.0 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.5 17.9 15.8 38.2 23.9 17.3 32.1 0.0 27.2 29.2 18.3 22.9 LnGrp LOS D B B D C B C A C C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 665 1063 374 437
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.0 24.3 29.3 26.0
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.1 15.6 8.6 22.4 11.6 18.0 9.0 22.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.2 9.7 5.1 9.0 7.4 9.4 5.4 15.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.8 0.0 2.3 0.2 0.6 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.7
HCM 6th LOS C
1677
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 37 188 43 1 1 25 30 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 37 188 43 1 1 25 30 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 2 2 0 9 1 0 3 3 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 117 4 51 258 59 2 2 50 49 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 326 0 0 123 0 0 523 559 124 557 532 298 Stage 1 - - - - - - 131 131 - 399 399 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 392 428 - 158 133 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 - - 1464 - - 465 438 927 441 453 741 Stage 1 - - - - - - 873 788 - 627 602 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 633 585 - 844 786 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1223 - - 1461 - - 446 413 923 396 427 734 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 446 413 - 396 427 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 868 783 - 619 571 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 604 555 - 791 781 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 1 9.5 15.2

HCM LOS A C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 850 1223 - - 1461 - - 402
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 0.004 - - 0.035 - - 0.126
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 8 0 - 7.6 0 - 15.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.4
1678
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 192 1013 201 137 494 167 101 19 118 112 14 134 Future Volume (veh/h) 192 1013 201 137 494 167 101 19 118 112 14 134 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 211 1113 221 151 543 184 116 22 136 135 17 161 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 258 1324 582 189 1186 515 150 33 204 189 321 269 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1545 1781 220 1361 1781 1870 1566 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 211 1113 221 151 543 184 116 0 158 135 17 161 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1545 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1566 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 19.4 7.0 5.6 8.1 6.1 4.3 0.0 6.4 5.0 0.5 6.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 19.4 7.0 5.6 8.1 6.1 4.3 0.0 6.4 5.0 0.5 6.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 258 1324 582 189 1186 515 150 0 237 189 321 269 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.84 0.38 0.80 0.46 0.36 0.77 0.00 0.67 0.71 0.05 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 360 1442 633 208 1186 515 326 0 434 473 668 559 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.1 19.4 15.5 29.6 17.8 17.1 30.4 0.0 27.2 29.3 23.5 25.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.9 4.4 0.4 18.2 0.3 0.4 8.1 0.0 3.2 4.9 0.1 2.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.8 7.7 2.2 3.2 3.0 2.0 2.1 0.0 2.6 2.3 0.2 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.0 23.8 16.0 47.8 18.0 17.5 38.5 0.0 30.5 34.2 23.5 28.1 LnGrp LOS D C B D B B D A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1545 878 274 313
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 23.0 33.8 30.5
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 14.6 11.7 29.7 10.2 16.1 14.3 27.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 8.4 7.6 21.4 6.3 8.4 9.8 10.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.6 0.0 3.8 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.6
HCM 6th LOS C
1679
Queues Timing Plan: AM Peak
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing plus Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 103 500 63 93 827 143 163 211 220 3 214 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.43 0.10 0.49 0.76 0.25 0.54 0.58 0.61 0.01 0.52 Control Delay 54.0 20.6 0.3 39.1 27.1 5.5 31.6 12.4 31.3 23.5 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.0 20.6 0.3 39.1 27.1 5.5 31.6 12.4 31.3 23.5 9.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 80 0 33 142 0 56 2 75 1 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #123 147 0 #98 #288 39 111 47 129 7 34 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 155 1151 605 195 1114 581 421 613 509 652 683 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.43 0.10 0.48 0.74 0.25 0.39 0.34 0.43 0.00 0.31 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
1680
Queues Timing Plan: PM
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 1113 221 151 543 184 116 158 135 17 161 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.48 0.28 0.49 0.55 0.51 0.06 0.41 Control Delay 41.7 27.6 6.1 61.2 22.9 2.7 37.0 16.2 35.7 28.5 7.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.7 27.6 6.1 61.2 22.9 2.7 37.0 16.2 35.7 28.5 7.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 220 10 65 100 0 47 9 55 7 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #197 #412 61 #183 176 25 101 58 102 22 29 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 338 1359 712 195 1132 652 306 513 445 629 648 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.48 0.28 0.38 0.31 0.30 0.03 0.25 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
1681
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix E – Cumulative Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
1682
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 10 122 31 0 0 12 49 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 10 122 31 0 0 12 49 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 0 4 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 269 1 11 139 35 0 0 18 67 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 181 0 0 274 0 0 455 479 274 467 462 164 Stage 1 - - - - - - 276 276 - 186 186 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 179 203 - 281 276 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1394 - - 1289 - - 515 486 765 506 497 881 Stage 1 - - - - - - 730 682 - 816 746 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 823 733 - 726 682 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1385 - - 1284 - - 508 475 762 487 486 875 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 508 475 - 487 486 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 726 679 - 809 733 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 813 721 - 708 679 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.8 13.5

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 762 1385 - - 1284 - - 491
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.001 - - 0.009 - - 0.139
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.6 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.5
1683
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 101 510 64 97 862 146 159 7 198 192 2 181 Future Volume (veh/h) 101 510 64 97 862 146 159 7 198 192 2 181 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 580 73 108 958 162 189 8 236 243 3 229 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 144 1045 458 138 1032 448 236 10 296 298 431 364 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1558 1781 3554 1541 1781 51 1512 1781 1870 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 580 73 108 958 162 189 0 244 243 3 229 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1558 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1577 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 9.3 2.4 4.0 17.8 5.7 7.0 0.0 10.1 8.9 0.1 8.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 9.3 2.4 4.0 17.8 5.7 7.0 0.0 10.1 8.9 0.1 8.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 144 1045 458 138 1032 448 236 0 306 298 431 364 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.56 0.16 0.78 0.93 0.36 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.82 0.01 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 144 1045 458 181 1032 448 391 0 433 473 604 509 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 20.2 17.7 30.7 23.4 19.1 28.6 0.0 26.0 27.2 20.1 23.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.8 0.6 0.2 14.8 13.9 0.5 6.2 0.0 6.8 6.0 0.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 3.5 0.8 2.2 8.6 1.9 3.3 0.0 4.2 4.2 0.0 3.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.4 20.8 17.9 45.5 37.3 19.6 34.8 0.0 32.7 33.2 20.1 25.3 LnGrp LOS E C B D D B C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 768 1228 433 475
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.9 35.7 33.6 29.3
Approach LOS C D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.8 17.8 9.8 24.4 13.5 20.1 10.0 24.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.9 12.1 6.0 11.3 9.0 10.9 6.3 19.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.8 0.0 2.2 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.7
HCM 6th LOS C
1684
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS 4:00 pm 01/13/2022 Cumulative Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 15 218 50 1 1 13 35 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 15 218 50 1 1 13 35 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 2 2 0 9 1 0 3 3 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 6 135 4 21 299 68 2 2 26 57 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 376 0 0 141 0 0 528 569 142 550 537 343 Stage 1 - - - - - - 151 151 - 384 384 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 377 418 - 166 153 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1182 - - 1442 - - 461 432 906 446 450 700 Stage 1 - - - - - - 851 772 - 639 611 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 644 591 - 836 771 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1172 - - 1439 - - 450 416 902 418 434 693 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 450 416 - 418 434 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 844 766 - 629 594 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 630 574 - 803 765 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.4 9.7 14.9

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 788 1172 - - 1439 - - 423
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 0.005 - - 0.014 - - 0.14
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 8.1 0 - 7.5 0 - 14.9
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.5
1685
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS 4:00 pm 01/13/2022 Cumulative Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 206 1174 233 159 572 182 117 22 137 123 16 146 Future Volume (veh/h) 206 1174 233 159 572 182 117 22 137 123 16 146 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 226 1290 256 175 629 200 134 25 157 148 19 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 270 1335 586 192 1181 513 171 35 217 198 327 274 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.38 0.38 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1545 1781 217 1364 1781 1870 1566 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 226 1290 256 175 629 200 134 0 182 148 19 176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1545 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1566 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.0 26.1 9.0 7.1 10.5 7.3 5.4 0.0 8.0 5.9 0.6 7.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 26.1 9.0 7.1 10.5 7.3 5.4 0.0 8.0 5.9 0.6 7.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 270 1335 586 192 1181 513 171 0 252 198 327 274 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.97 0.44 0.91 0.53 0.39 0.78 0.00 0.72 0.75 0.06 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 333 1335 586 192 1181 513 302 0 402 438 618 518 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.2 22.4 17.1 32.3 19.8 18.8 32.4 0.0 29.2 31.5 25.2 28.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.3 17.2 0.5 40.7 0.5 0.5 7.6 0.0 3.9 5.5 0.1 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 12.7 2.9 5.0 4.0 2.4 2.6 0.0 3.2 2.8 0.3 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.5 39.6 17.6 73.0 20.3 19.2 40.0 0.0 33.1 37.0 25.3 30.6 LnGrp LOS D D B E C B D A C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1772 1004 316 343
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.1 29.3 36.1 33.1
Approach LOS D C D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.7 16.2 12.4 32.0 11.5 17.3 15.6 28.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.9 10.0 9.1 28.1 7.4 9.7 11.0 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.2 3.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.3
HCM 6th LOS C
1686
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix F – Cumulative plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
1687
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 17 122 31 0 0 33 49 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 17 122 31 0 0 33 49 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 0 4 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 269 1 19 139 35 0 0 49 67 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 181 0 0 274 0 0 471 495 274 498 478 164 Stage 1 - - - - - - 276 276 - 202 202 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 195 219 - 296 276 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1394 - - 1289 - - 503 476 765 483 486 881 Stage 1 - - - - - - 730 682 - 800 734 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 807 722 - 712 682 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1385 - - 1284 - - 494 463 762 443 472 875 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 494 463 - 443 472 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 726 679 - 794 717 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 793 705 - 665 679 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 10.1 14.5

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 762 1385 - - 1284 - - 447
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 0.001 - - 0.015 - - 0.153
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.6 0 - 7.8 0 - 14.5
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.5
1688
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 105 510 64 97 862 149 159 7 198 200 2 194 Future Volume (veh/h) 105 510 64 97 862 149 159 7 198 200 2 194 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 119 580 73 108 958 166 189 8 236 253 3 246 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 143 1035 454 138 1025 444 235 10 296 307 441 372 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1558 1781 3554 1541 1781 51 1512 1781 1870 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 119 580 73 108 958 166 189 0 244 253 3 246 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1558 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1577 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 9.4 2.4 4.1 17.9 5.9 7.0 0.0 10.2 9.4 0.1 9.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 9.4 2.4 4.1 17.9 5.9 7.0 0.0 10.2 9.4 0.1 9.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 143 1035 454 138 1025 444 235 0 306 307 441 372 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.56 0.16 0.78 0.94 0.37 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.82 0.01 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 143 1035 454 180 1025 444 388 0 430 469 599 505 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.0 20.5 18.0 30.9 23.7 19.4 28.8 0.0 26.2 27.3 20.0 23.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 31.8 0.7 0.2 15.1 15.0 0.5 6.3 0.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.1 3.6 0.8 2.2 8.8 2.0 3.3 0.0 4.2 4.4 0.0 3.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.7 21.2 18.2 46.0 38.7 19.9 35.1 0.0 33.2 34.3 20.0 25.7 LnGrp LOS E C B D D B D A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 772 1232 433 502
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.3 36.8 34.0 30.0
Approach LOS C D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.3 17.9 9.8 24.4 13.5 20.6 10.0 24.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.4 12.2 6.1 11.4 9.0 11.7 6.5 19.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.8 0.0 2.2 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.7
HCM 6th LOS C
1689
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 39 218 50 1 1 27 35 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 39 218 50 1 1 27 35 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 2 2 0 9 1 0 3 3 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 6 135 4 53 299 68 2 2 54 57 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 376 0 0 141 0 0 592 633 142 628 601 343 Stage 1 - - - - - - 151 151 - 448 448 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 441 482 - 180 153 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1182 - - 1442 - - 418 397 906 395 414 700 Stage 1 - - - - - - 851 772 - 590 573 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 595 553 - 822 771 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1172 - - 1439 - - 399 372 902 351 388 693 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 399 372 - 351 388 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 844 766 - 581 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 565 522 - 764 765 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 1 9.7 17.1

HCM LOS A C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 826 1172 - - 1439 - - 356
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 0.005 - - 0.037 - - 0.166
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 8.1 0 - 7.6 0 - 17.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6
1690
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 220 1174 233 159 572 192 117 22 137 129 16 154 Future Volume (veh/h) 220 1174 233 159 572 192 117 22 137 129 16 154 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 242 1290 256 175 629 211 134 25 157 155 19 186 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 285 1328 584 191 1141 496 171 35 217 205 333 279 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1544 1781 217 1364 1781 1870 1566 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 242 1290 256 175 629 211 134 0 182 155 19 186 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1544 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1566 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.7 26.3 9.0 7.2 10.7 7.9 5.4 0.0 8.0 6.2 0.6 8.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.7 26.3 9.0 7.2 10.7 7.9 5.4 0.0 8.0 6.2 0.6 8.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 285 1328 584 191 1141 496 171 0 251 205 333 279 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.97 0.44 0.91 0.55 0.43 0.78 0.00 0.72 0.76 0.06 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 332 1328 584 191 1141 496 300 0 400 436 615 515 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.0 22.6 17.3 32.5 20.6 19.6 32.5 0.0 29.4 31.5 25.1 28.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.5 18.2 0.5 41.9 0.6 0.6 7.7 0.0 3.9 5.6 0.1 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.2 12.9 3.0 5.1 4.1 0.1 2.7 0.0 3.3 2.9 0.3 3.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.5 40.8 17.8 74.4 21.2 20.2 40.2 0.0 33.3 37.1 25.2 30.9 LnGrp LOS D D B E C C D A C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1788 1015 316 360
Approach Delay, s/veh 38.3 30.1 36.2 33.3
Approach LOS D C D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 16.2 12.4 32.0 11.6 17.6 16.3 28.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.2 10.0 9.2 28.3 7.4 10.1 11.7 12.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 3.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.2
HCM 6th LOS D
1691

HERCULES SKELLY ISMND MITIGATION MEASURES
MM AIR-1 Implement BAAQMD Best Management Practices During Construction The following dust control measures, as recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), shall be included in the design of the proposed project and implemented during construction:
• All exposed non-paved surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and access roads) shall be watered at least two times per day and/or non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to exposed non-paved surfaces.
• All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered and/or shall maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard.
• All visible mud or dirt tracked out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. • All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. • All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. • Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes, as required by the California Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ACTM) Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations. Clear signage regarding idling restrictions shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. • All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
• The prime construction contractor shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The City and the construction contractor shall take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

MM BIO-1A Roosting Bats
• A qualified Biologist with relevant roosting bat experience shall conduct a survey for special-status bats during the appropriate time of day to maximize detectability to determine whether bat species are roosting near the work area no less than 7 days and no more than 14 days prior to beginning ground disturbance and/or construction. Survey methodology may include visual surveys of bats (e.g., observation of bats during foraging period), inspection for suitable habitat or bat sign (e.g., guano), or use of ultrasonic detectors (Anabat, etc.).
• Visual surveys shall include trees and structures within 500 feet of project construction activities (where accessible). Not more than 2 weeks prior to building demolition and/or tree removal, the project applicant shall ensure that a qualified Biologist (i.e., one familiar with the identification of bats and signs of bats) survey the trees and structures proposed for removal for the presence of roosting bats or evidence of bats. If no roosting bats or evidence of bats are found in the structure, removal may proceed. If the Biologist determines or presumes bats are present, the Biologist shall exclude the bats from suitable spaces by installing one-way exclusion devices. After the bats vacate the space, the Biologist shall close off the space to prevent recolonization. Structure and tree removal shall only commence after the Biologist verifies 7 to 10 days later that the exclusion methods have successfully prevented bats from returning. Bat exclusion shall only occur between February 15 and April 15, and from August 15 through October 30, to avoid impacts on non-volant (i.e., nonflying) individuals. 1692
MM BIO-1B: Protection of Active Bird Nests (includes pre-construction survey and implementation of avoidance buffer, if found)
• If the project requires trees to be removed during the nesting season (usually February through August), a pre-construction survey shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to the start of ground or vegetation disturbance (including tree removal) to determine whether or not active nests are present. • If an active nest is located during pre-construction survey, a qualified Biologist shall determine an appropriately sized avoidance buffer based on the species and anticipated disturbance level. (The California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW] recommends a minimum no-disturbance buffer of 250 feet around active nests of non-listed bird species and a 500-foot no-disturbance buffer around active nests of non-listed raptors.) A qualified Biologist shall delineate the avoidance buffer using Environmentally Sensitive Area fencing, pin flags, and or yellow caution tape. The buffer zone shall be maintained around the active nest site(s) until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. No construction activities or construction foot traffic is allowed to occur within the avoidance buffer(s).

The qualified Biologist shall monitor the active nest during construction activities to prevent any potential impacts that may result from the construction of the proposed project, until the young have fledged.

MM BIO-1C: Overwintering Monarch Butterfly
Project activities such as vegetation removal, grading, or initial ground-disturbing activities shall be conducted between November 1 and July 31 (outside of the overwintering season) to the extent feasible. If such activities must be initiated during the overwintering season (August 1 through October 31), a pre-construction overwintering survey shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist no more than 7 days prior to vegetation removal, grading, or initial ground disturbance. The survey shall include the disturbance area and surrounding 250 feet to identify the location and status of any colonies that could potentially be affected either directly or indirectly by project activities. If no colonies are present, then project activities can commence as scheduled. If a colony is present, project construction shall cease immediately to avoid all direct and indirect impacts and report the presence of the colony to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and follow all recommendations provided by USFWS and CDFW.

MM BIO-2: Avoidance and Minimization Measures for On-Site Aquatic Features • No work within the Riparian Corridor and Creek Banks or Bed. No work (including vegetation removal) shall take place within this area unless specifically permitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE).
• Erosion Control: At no time shall silt-laden runoff be allowed to enter on-site aquatic features and their associated habitats. Erosion control measures shall be utilized throughout all phases of operation where sediment runoff from the project may enter these aquatic features. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to avoid erosion, uncontrolled stormwater runoff and bank deterioration shall be implemented, following the requirements of the proposed project’s Stormwater Control Plan, and typically include silt fencing, coir rolls, and/or straw bale dikes.
• Prevention of Toxic Substances/Pollution. No substances toxic to fish and wildlife shall be discharged or allowed to leach into the aquatic features present on-site. Reasonable precautions to protect aquatic habitats from pollution with harmful materials (e.g., fuels, oils, lubricants, and solvents) shall be implemented. Specifically, all potentially hazardous materials shall be controlled, cleaned up, and properly disposed of in accordance with the project’s water quality control permits and plans. Materials deleterious or toxic to fish and wildlife, including, but not limited to, asphalt, tires, concrete, construction materials, 1693
treated wood, and creosote containing materials, shall not be stockpiled within 150 feet any aquatic feature present on-site.
• Wildlife Exclusion Fencing and Monitoring. Wildlife Exclusion Fencing (WEF) shall be constructed around the entire perimeter of the project site and the northern riparian dripline associated with the perennial drainage, to prevent wildlife from entering the work area. A qualified Biologist shall be on-site to monitor the installation of WEF. WEF shall be in place and regularly maintained during project implementation.

Fencing shall be removed within 72 hours of completion of work, and temporarily impacted areas shall be restored to pre-project conditions.

MM BIO-3: Protection of Mature Trees (Tree Inventory and Replacement Plan) • The project applicant shall adhere to the requirements of the City’s tree ordinance (Title 4, Chapter 15), which includes a submittal of a Tree Replacement Plan to the City prior to the removal of trees and/or prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit. Prior to the submission of the Tree Replacement Plan, a certified arborist shall conduct a Tree Inventory to determine the number and type of trees scheduled to be removed.
• Following the completion of the Tree Inventory, a certified arborist shall complete the Tree Replacement Plan and shall designate the approximate locations, number, and sizes of trees to be planted. The Tree Replacement Plan shall include a minimum 1:1 replacement ratio for City-protected trees impacted by project construction.

MM CUL-1
An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology shall be present during the demolition of buildings at the site, grubbing and ground clearance, and during initial grading and project-related ground disturbance. Should exposed soils indicate archaeological resources may be present, archaeological monitoring of all project related ground disturbance will continue as determined necessary by the Archaeologist. In the event that buried cultural resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop within a 100-foot radius of the find and a qualified Archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified Archaeologist shall make recommendations to the lead agency on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Potentially significant cultural resources consist of, but are not limited to, stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historical dumpsites. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within the project site should be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA Guidelines.

If the resources are determined to be unique historical resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the lead agency.

Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the lead agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution approved by the lead agency where they would be afforded long-term preservation to allow future scientific study.
1694
MM CUL-2
Should previously unknown buried human remains be discovered during construction of the proposed project, Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code applies, and the following procedures shall be followed.

In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project-related earthmoving begins, and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:
1) There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site, or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the “most likely descendant” of the deceased Native American. The most likely descendant may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods, as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, or
2) Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his/her authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the most likely descendant or on the project area in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance:
• The NAHC is unable to identify a most likely descendant, or the most likely descendant failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the Commission; • The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation; or • The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.

MM GEO-1
Prior to issuance of preliminary grading permits, the project applicant shall incorporate all recommendations provided in the project-Geotechnical Investigation into project plans. The Geotechnical recommendations outlined on Page 9 through Page 22 of the Geotechnical Investigation that shall be implemented include general earthwork recommendations for site preparation, removal of unsuitable soils, surface and subsurface drainage, bio-filtration facilities, foundations, concrete flatwork, retaining walls, spread and pier footings, pavement areas, utility trenches, project review, and construction monitoring. Additionally, these include recommendations related to structural design, foundation design, foundation systems, slabs, moisture barriers, seismic design, walls, footing excavations, slabs and walkways, concrete design, corrosion, pavement design, as well as lot maintenance, and future plan reviews.

MM GEO-2
Prior to the commencement of earth-disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist shall provide the construction crew with an orientation on significant fossils that could be encountered and the appropriate procedures to follow in the event of a discovery. If any vertebrate remains (i.e., bones, teeth, or unusually abundant and well-preserved invertebrates or plants) be unearthed, all work in the immediate vicinity of the discovery should be diverted at least 15 feet until a professional paleontologist assesses the find and, if deemed appropriate, salvages it in a timely manner. All recovered fossils shall be deposited in an appropriate repository, 1695
such as the University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP), where they shall be properly curated and made accessible for future study.

MM NOI-1
To reduce potential construction noise impacts, the following best management measures shall be implemented during all phases of construction. In addition, all of the following measures shall be printed on the project construction documents prior to issuance of building permits:
• The construction contractor shall limit noise producing construction activities, including deliveries and equipment warmup, to the hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No noise producing construction activity shall be permitted on Sundays. • The construction contractor shall ensure that all equipment driven by internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers, which are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. • The construction contractor shall ensure that unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., idling in excess of 5 minutes) is prohibited.
• The construction contractor shall utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where such market available technology exists.
• At all times during project grading and construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that stationary noise-generating equipment shall be located as far as practicable, and a minimum of 50 feet, from sensitive receptors and placed so that emitted noise is directed away from the nearest residential land uses.
• Where a solid fence or wall is not already present along the property line of an adjoining residential land use, the construction contractor shall construct temporary, minimum 6-foot-high, solid noise barrier/fence with a minimum surface weight of 4 pounds per square foot, which would be effective to reduce construction noise by up to 5 A-weighted decibel (dBA). • The construction contractor shall designate a noise disturbance coordinator who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator would determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and establish reasonable measures necessary to correct the problem. The construction contractor shall visibly post a telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction site.

MM TRANS-1
During design review and prior to issuance of grading permits, the proposed grading plans shall be carefully evaluated to ensure that the finished grade and landscaping do not create any visual obstructions for vehicles exiting the driveway. Should the finished grade or landscaping create visual obstructions, the proposed landscaping shall be altered such that there would no longer be obstructions. 1696

DESIGN REVIEW & VESTING TENTATIVE MAP

OWL RANCH
SUBDIVISION 9606

HERCULES, CALIFORNIA

DEVELOPER

CIVIL ENGINEER

CARLSON, BARBEE & GIBSON
2633 CAMINO RAMON, SUITE 350
SAN RAMON, CA 94583
(925) 866-0322
C0NTACT: COLT ALVERNAZ

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
R3 STUDIOS, INC.
201 4TH STREET, SUITE 101B
OAKLAND, CA 94607
(510) 808-5782
CONTACT: ROMAN DE SOTA
D.R. HORTON
3000 EXECUTIVE PARKWAY, SUITE 100
SAN RAMON, CA 94583
(925) 332-6737
CONTACT: ADAM FOSTER

WHA ARCHITECTS
5000 EXECUTIVE PARKWAY, SUITE 375
SAN RAMON, CA 94583
(925) 463-1700
CONTACT: MARK RETHERFORD

1. COVER SHEET - INDEX SHEET

CIVIL SHEETS (VESTING TENTATIVE MAP)

2. C1.0 PRELIMINARY LOTTING PLAN

3. C1.1 PRELIMINARY SITE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN

4. C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

5. C2.1 EXISTING TREE DATA

6. C3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

7. C4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN

8. C5.0 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN

9. C6.0 PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN

10. C7.0 PRELIMINARY FIRE ACCESS PLAN

LANDSCAPE SHEETS

11. L.1.1 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN

12. L.1.2 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN

13. L.2.1 WALL, FENCE, & MAILBOX PLAN

14. L.2.2 WALL, FENCE, & MAILBOX DETAILS

15. L.2.3 WALL, FENCE, & MAILBOX DETAILS

16. L.3.1 TREE PRESERVATION AND PROPOSED TREE PLAN

17. L.4.1 ENTRY MONUMENT

18. L.5.1 TYPICAL FRONT YARD CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING PLANS - PLAN 1583

19. L.5.2 TYPICAL FRONT YARD CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING PLANS - PLAN 1859

20. L.5.3 TYPICAL FRONT YARD CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING PLANS - PLAN 2311

21. L.5.4 PLANTING PLAN - PARCEL B

22. L.6.1 PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE

23. L.7.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS

24. L.7.2 IRRIGATION DETAILS

25. L.8.1 PLANTING DETAILS

ARCHITECTURE SHEETS

26. A1.1 PLAN 1583 FLOOR PLANS

27. A1.2 PLAN 1583 ROOF PLANS

28. A1.3 PLAN 1583 FRONT ELEVATIONS

29. A1.4 PLAN 1583 ELEVATION A - FARMHOUSE

30. A1.5 PLAN 1583 ELEVATION B - TRADITIONAL

31. A1.6 PLAN 1583 ELEVATION C - CRAFTSMAN

32. A2.1 PLAN 1859 FLOOR PLANS

33. A2.2 PLAN 1859 ROOF PLANS

34. A2.3 PLAN 1859 FRONT ELEVATIONS

35. A2.4 PLAN 1859 ELEVATION A - FARMHOUSE

36. A2.5 PLAN 1859 ELEVATION B - TRADITIONAL

37. A2.6 PLAN 1859 ELEVATION C - CRAFTSMAN

38. A3.1 PLAN 2311 FLOOR PLANS

39. A3.2 PLAN 2311 ROOF PLANS

40. A3.3 PLAN 2311 FRONT ELEVATIONS

41. A3.4 PLAN 2311 ELEVATION A - FARMHOUSE

42. A3.5 PLAN 2311 ELEVATION B - TRADITIONAL

43. A3.6 PLAN 2311 ELEVATION C - CRAFTSMAN

44. A4.1 FARMHOUSE ELEVATION DETAILS

45. A4.2 TRADITIONAL ELEVATION DETAILS

46. A4.3 CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION DETAILS

47. A4.4 BUILDING SECTIONS

48. A5.1 LIGHTING FIXTURES

49. A5.2 EXTERIOR COLOR & MATERIALS

50. A5.3 EXTERIOR COLOR & MATERIALS

51. A5.4 EXTERIOR COLOR & MATERIALS

SHEET INDEX

ARCHITECT

CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C0.0-COVER SHEET.DWG5/27/2022 11:07 AM
MAY 2022
1697
SKELLY

PEARCE ROAD
ROSTI

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD
PAVON

PARCEL D

PARCEL E

PARCEL G

PARCEL F

PARCEL A
8 9
1 11
10 PARCEL C
14 15
12 13
39 31
30 32
38 40
33 37
35 36
34 29
22 28
25 26 27
23 24
18 19 20 21 16 17

PARCEL B
2 3
4 5
6 7
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C1.0-LOTTING PLAN.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

LOTTING PLAN
C1.0

GENERAL NOTES

VICINITY MAP
SEE SHEET C1.1 FOR BUILDING LAYOUT, SETBACKS, & STREET SECTIONS

LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS
1698
14 12
6 4
37 35
29 25
33 3
1 26
23 21
17 18
38 7
15 11
10 9
2 PEARCE ROAD
ROSTI
32 31
13 36
5 24
16 19 20
27 34
8 22
28 30

SKELLY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD
PAVON
39 40

PARCEL D

PARCEL E

PARCEL G

PARCEL F

PARCEL A

PARCEL B

PARCEL C

BIORETENTION

CONNECTION

TO BAY TRAIL
45' PRIVATE STREET 43' PRIVATE STREET 34' PRIVATE STREET

PRODUCT MIX
PLAN # # OF LOTS % OF TOTAL
MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:

F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C1.1-DEVELOPMENT PLAN.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

PRELIMINARY SITE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
C1.1

EMERGENCY VEHICLE

TURNING TEMPLATE

LAND USE TABLE
PARCEL DESCRIPTION AREA (AC) % of TOTAL

LANDSCAPE AREA SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION AREA (SF) AREA (AC)
1699
SKELLY

PEARCE ROAD
ROSTI

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD
PAVON
#89
#91
#35 #34
#33
#32
#31
#29
#28
#30
#27
#26
#25
#24
#23
#22
#19
#21
#20
#8
#10
#18
#17
#16
#15
#13 #14
#9
#12
#11
#7
#87
#86
#88
#85
#84
#83
#82
#79
#80
#81
#92
#90
#96
#93
#95
#77
#78
#94
#76
#75
#73
#72
#70
#69
#68
#66
#67
#6
#5
#4
#3
#2
#1
#36
#37 #38
#40
#46
#44
#48
#71
#65
#64
#63
#62
#57
#58 #59
#60 #61
#49
#50
#53
#51
#52
#54
#55
#56
#47
#45
#42
#41
#43
#39
LEGEND
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C2.0-EXISTING CONDITIONS.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
C2.0
NOTES:

1. SEE SHEET C2.1 FOR EXISTING TREE DATA

2. EXISTING AVERAGE SITE SLOPE = 5.8% ±
1700
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C2.0-EXISTING CONDITIONS.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

Remove or
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Retain
Remove
Retain
Remove
Retain
Retain
Remove or
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Remove or
Retain
Remove
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Retain
Remove
Retain
Remove
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove or
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove or
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Retain
Remove
Remove
Retain
Retain
Retain
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove or
Retain
Retain
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove or
Retain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove
Remove or
Retain
Remove

EXISTING TREE DATA
C2.1
1701
15 12
6 37
23 18
38 SKELLY
32 13
19 34
14 30
11 10
9 4
2 35
29 31
25 33
36 3
5 1
26 24
21 20 17
16 27
8 7
22 28

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD
ROSTI
PAVON
39 40

PARCEL D PARCEL E

PARCEL G

PARCEL F
PAD 19.2
PAD 22.7
PAD 23.7
PAD 35.2
PAD 19.0
PAD 19.0
PAD 19.0
PAD 18.2
PAD 19.6
PAD 19.4 PAD 19.0 PAD 19.0
PAD 19.6 PAD 21.0
PAD 25.6
PAD 29.6
PAD 27.4 PAD 30.4 PAD 32.3
PAD 37.3
PAD 37.0
PAD 34.0
PAD 31.5
PAD 29.3
PAD 26.3
PAD 24.7
PAD 22.7
PAD 21.7
PAD 19.4
PAD 18.7
PAD 19.0 PAD 19.3
PAD 19.0
PAD 19.0
PAD 19.0
PAD 23.7 PAD 25.6
PAD 31.5
PAD 25.3
PAD 21.3
B
B
A A
D
D
G
G
F
F

PARCEL C

PARCEL B

BIORETENTION
TSM 13.0
C
C
E E

SECTION A-A

SECTION D-D

SECTION B-B

SECTION F-F

STREET A

SECTION G-G

SECTION C-C

SECTION E-E
LEGEND:

F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C3.0-PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
C3.0

EARTHWORK SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION CUT FILL
1702

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD SKELLY

PEARCE ROAD
ROSTI

RAILROAD
PAVON

PARCEL D

PARCEL E

PARCEL G

PARCEL F

PARCEL C
34 36
32 31 30
40 38 39
33 35
28 37
15 14
13 12
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27
29 11
8 7
10 6
9 5
4 3
2 1

PARCEL B

BIORETENTION
TSM 13.0
LEGEND
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C4.0-PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
C4.0

DECORATIVE STREET LIGHT
1703
SKELLY

PEARCE ROAD
ROSTI

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD
PAVON

PARCEL D

PARCEL E

PARCEL G

PARCEL F

PARCEL A

PARCEL C
12 13
14 15
18 19 20 21 16 17
22 26
25 23 24 27 28
37 35
36 34
31 30
33 32
39 38 40
5 7 8
9 11
10 6
2 3
1 4
29 DMA 1

PARCEL B
TSM 13.0

BIORETENTION
LEGEND
DMA 1
IMP 1
25 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
C5.0
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C5.0-PRELIMINARY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA SUMMARY

AREA ID IMPERVIOUS AREA
(SF)

PERVIOUS AREA
(SF)

REQUIRED
(SF)

PROVIDED
(SF)
·
·
·
NOTES

LANDSCAPE & BIO RETENTION AREA DETAIL
NOTE:
1704

PEARCE ROAD

ROSTI PAVON
SKELLY
215 SKELLY
PROJECT SITE 8' OFFSITE BUMP-OUT

BUMP-OUT AT PROJECT ENTRY ON SKELLY

ONSITE BUMP-OUT ALONG TRAIL EXTENSION

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD

NEIGHBORHOOD

CONNECTION

BAY TRAIL

CONNECTION

PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN
C6.0
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C6.0-TRAFFIC CALMIN PLAN.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

LEGEND
1705

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FCD & WCD SKELLY

PEARCE ROAD
ROSTI

RAILROAD
PAVON

PARCEL D

PARCEL E

PARCEL G

PARCEL F

PARCEL C
34 36
32 31 30
40 38 39
33 35
28 37
15 14
13 12
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27
29 11
8 7
10 6
9 5
4 3
2 1

PARCEL B

BIORETENTION
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
30 4 20 SU-30 - Single Unit Truck Overall Length 30.000ft Overall Width 8.000ft
Overall Body Height 13.500ft
Min Body Ground Clearance 1.367ft
Track Width 8.000ft
Lock-to-lock time 5.00s
Max Steering Angle (Virtual) 31.80°
30°
60° 90°
120°
150°
180° (Outer Wheel) 34.29ftMin Radius

19.972ftMin Radius
(Inner Wheel)

39.082ftMin Radius
(Outer Body)

17.556ft
Max Kickout 3.376ft
F:\3204\ACAD\TM\C7.0-PRELIMINARY FIRE ACCESS PLAN.DWG

VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
OWL RANCH - SUBDIVISION 9606

CITY OF HERCULES CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: MAY 2022
0 40 80 120 CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS

SAN RAMON
WWW.CBANDG.COM

ROSEVILLE
(925) 866-0322
(916) 788-4456
SHEET NO.

PRELIMINARY FIRE ACCESS PLAN
C7.0

HERCULES RODEO FIRE ENGINE

TURNING TEMPLATE & SPECS
1706

OWL RANCH
1707

OWL RANCH
1708

OWL RANCH
1709

OWL RANCH
1710

OWL RANCH
1711

OWL RANCH
1712

OWL RANCH
1713

OWL RANCH
1714

OWL RANCH
1715

OWL RANCH
1716

OWL RANCH
1717

OWL RANCH
1718

OWL RANCH
1719

OWL RANCH
1720

OWL RANCH
1721
OWL RANCH A1.1

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE
2 BAY
GARAGE
CONC.
2468
2468
28 SC 68
2468
UP
17R
ENTRY
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.

POWDER
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.

EAT-IN

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.

PORCH
9'-0" CLG. (STUCCO)
CONC.

GREAT
ROOM
9'-0" CLG.

CARPET
14'-8" X 14'-3" 30 SC 68
3050 SH 3050 SH 6080 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2030 SH
FX
TEMP. GL.
2030 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
4040 SL
3050 SH
28 68
CHS
C HS
FSR
W/H
30'-0"
10'-6" 19'-6"
5'-0" 35'-6"
40'-6"40'-6"
30'-0"
5'-0" 35'-6"
24 68
DN
17R
SERV.
8'-0" CLG.

H.S.
24 68
30 68
26 68
26 68
28 68
24 68
W.I.C.
8'-0" CLG.

CARPET
BATH 1
8'-0" CLG.

H.S.
5068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
BATH 2
8'-0" CLG.

H.S.

BDRM. 1
8'-0" CLG.

CARPET
13'-0" X 13'-2"
BDRM. 3
8'-0" CLG.

CARPET
10'-1" X 10'-1" BDRM. 2
8'-0" CLG.

CARPET
10'-1" X 10'-0"
LOFT
8'-0" CLG.

CARPET
10'-3" X 13'-5"
2030 SH
4040 SL 2030 SH 4040 SL 4040 SL
FX 2030 FX 2030
2030 FX 4040 SL
4040 SL
2030 SH

CHS C HS
60"x42"
C HS

OPEN TO
BELOW
30'-0"
10'-6" 19'-6"
3'-0" 37'-6"
40'-6"40'-6"
30'-0"
5'-0" 35'-6"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1583
1,583 S.F.
3 Bdrm|2.5 Bath|Loft
2-Car Garage
A1.1
Second Floor 946 S.F. First Floor 637 S.F.
1722
OWL RANCH A1.2

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 0 4 8 16
RIDGE
R
5:12 5:12
5:12
5:12
RIDGE
5:12
5:125:12 5:12
HIP
HIP
VALLEY
5:12
5:12
HIP
5:12 HIP
5:12
HIP
HIP R
RIDGE
4:124:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
4:124:12
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
A1.2
PLAN 1583
Roof Plans
Elevation C| Craftsman Craftsman Elevation Elevation B| Traditional Traditional Elevation Elevation A| Farmhouse Farmhouse Elevation 1723
OWL RANCH A1.3

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 PLAN 1583
Front Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.

Elevation A| Farmhouse
Color Scheme 7B
Elevation B| Traditional
Color Scheme 4B
Elevation C| Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
1724
OWL RANCH A1.4

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
25'-9"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1583
Farmhouse Elevations
A1.4
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation A - Farmhouse (Color Scheme 7B)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Board and Batten Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Address Light
9 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 1583
'A' - Farmhouse Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 2
3 5
2 3
5 7
6 8
9 4
1 1
1 2
3 1
4 3
5 4
5 1725
OWL RANCH A1.5

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
25'-9"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1583
Traditional Elevations
A1.5
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation B - Traditional (Color Scheme 4B)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
5 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
6 Entry Door: Fiberglass
7 Address Light
8 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 1583
'B' - Traditional Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 6
5 7
8 3
1 1
2 3
4 1
2 4
3 1
2 4
4 3
1726
OWL RANCH A1.6

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
25'-4"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1583
Craftsman Elevations
A1.6
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation C - Craftsman (Color Scheme 6C)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Gable Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Manufactured Stone Veneer
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 1583
'C' - Craftsman Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 2
5 3
2 5
3 8 7
6 9
10 3
1 1
8 2
3 1
4 1
5 8
5 1727
OWL RANCH A2.1

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
6080 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
2030 SH 2030 SH
TEMP. GL.
2030 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH
4040 SL
2-CAR GARAGE
20'-5" x 20'-4"
UP
ENTRY
VOL. CLG.

H.S.

PORCH
GREAT
ROOM
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.
16'-8" x 16'-11"

COUNTRY

KITCHEN
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.

BEDROOM 4
9'-0" CLG.

CARPET
BATH 3
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.
10'-4" 19'-8"
30'-0"
51'-0"
8'-6" 40'-0" 2'-6"
46'-0" 5'-0"
51'-0"
30'-0"
17'-0" 13'-0"
10'-1" x 10'-0"
3050 SH 3050 SH
3050 SH
26 68
BI-PASS 5068
28 68
FSR
28 SC 68
24 68
24 68
30 SC 68
24 68
17R
W/H
4040 SL 4040 SL 4040 SL
4040 SL
2030 FX
2030 SH
FX 2030 FX 2030
2030 SH
2030 SH 2030 SH
SERV.
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.

BATH 2
9'-0" CLG.

H.S.

BDRM 3
9'-0" CLG.

CARPET
10'-0" x 10'-6"
LOFT
9'-0" CLG.

CARPET
10'-1" x 13'-1"
DN
W.I.C.
9'-0" CLG.

CARPET
13'-9" L.P.

BDRM 2
9'-0" CLG.

CARPET
10'-4" x 10'-0"
10'-4" 19'-8"
30'-0"
48'-6"
8'-6" 40'-0"
36'-8" 3'-4"
40'-0"
30'-0"
8'-6"
2'-6"2'-6"
60"x42"
24 68
5068 BI-PASS
28 68
26 68
30 68
26 68
5068 BI-PASS
24 68
BDRM. 1
8'-0" CLG.

CARPET
13'-0" X 13'-2"
BATH 1
8'-0" CLG.

H.S.

C HS
24 68
17R
40 40 SL
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1859
1,859 S.F.
4 Bdrm|3 Bath|Loft
2-Car Garage
A2.1
Second Floor 982 S.F. First Floor 877 S.F.
1728
OWL RANCH A2.2

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 0 4 8 16
RIDGE
R
RIDGE
R
VALLEY
VALLEY
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
V
RIDGE
R

RIDGE RIDGE
HIP
HIP
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12
HIP
HIP
VALLEY
5:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
R
RIDGE
VALLEY
RIDGE
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
A2.2
PLAN 1859
Roof Plans
Elevation C| Craftsman Craftsman Elevation Elevation B| Traditional Traditional Elevation Elevation A| Farmhouse Farmhouse Elevation 1729
OWL RANCH A2.3

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 PLAN 1859
Front Elevations
Elevation A| Farmhouse
Color Scheme 3B
Elevation B| Traditional
Color Scheme 1BC
Elevation C| Craftsman
Color Scheme 5C
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
1730
OWL RANCH A2.4

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
25'-9"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1859
Farmhouse Elevations
A2.4
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation A - Farmhouse (Color Scheme 3B)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Board and Batten Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Shutters: Decorative Foam
8 Entry Door: Fiberglass
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 1859
'A' - Farmhouse Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 8
6 9
10 7
3 2
4 1
3 4
1 3
7 2
4 1
2 5
4 5
5 5
1731
OWL RANCH A2.5

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
25'-9"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1859
Traditional Elevations
A2.5
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation B - Traditional (Color Scheme 1BC)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
5 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
6 Entry Door: Fiberglass
7 Address Light
8 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 1859
'B' - Traditional Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 6
5 7
8 4
1 1
2 3
3 4
1 2
4 3
1 2
4 3
1732
OWL RANCH A2.6

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
25'-7"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 1859
Craftsman Elevations
A2.6
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation C - Craftsman (Color Scheme 5C)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Gable Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Manufactured Stone Veneer
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 1859
'C' - Craftsman Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 8 7
6 9
10 3
4 1
1 2
3 5
1 8
2 5
5 1
3 8
2 5
3 1733
OWL RANCH A3.1

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 UP
BDRM. 5
9'-1" CLG.

CARPET
9'-7" x 10'-9"
BATH 3
9'-1" CLG.

H.S.

ENTRY
9'-1" CLG.

H.S.

GREAT ROOM
9'-1" CLG.

CARPET
13'-6" x 17'-0"
DINING
9'-1" CLG.

H.S.
9'-5" x 17'-0"

KITCHEN
9'-1" CLG.

H.S.
2-CAR GARAGE
20'-2" x 20'-5"
4040 SL 6080 TEMP. GL. SLIDER
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
30 SC 68
3050 SH
2668
2468
2468
28 SC 68
2468
2468
11'-6" x 16'-9"
17R
20-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE
FSR
3050 SH 3050 SH
28 68
3050 SH
W/H
3050 SH 3050 SH
2050 SH
SOCIAL
PORCH
39'-0" 13'-6"
52'-6"
16'-0" 19'-0"
35'-0"
46'-0"
35'-0"
6'-6"
52'-6"
BDRM. 1
8'-1" CLG.

CARPET
15'-0" x 17'-0"
BATH 1
8'-1" CLG.

H.S.

W.I.C.
8'-1" CLG.

CARPET
22'-6" L.P.

BDRM. 2
8'-1" CLG.

CARPET
10'-6" x 10'-2"
BDRM. 4
8'-1" CLG.

CARPET
10'-1" x 10'-0"
BDRM. 3
8'-1" CLG.

CARPET
10'-0" x 12'-4"
LOFT
8'-1" CLG.

CARPET
13'-8" x 12'-10"
BATH 2
8'-1" CLG.

H.S.

SERVICE
8'-1" CLG.

H.S.

DN
BI-PASS 5068
5068 BI-PASS
5068 BI-PASS
26682668
2868
242668
68 3080
2468
2468
2030 SH FX 3050
4040 SL 4040 SL
4040 SL
2468
17R
4040 SL
48"x34"
TEMP. GL.
4040 SL
CHS
CHS
2030 SH
40 40 SL 40 40 SL
40'-6" 12'-1"
14'-0" 21'-0"
35'-0"
2'-0" 38'-6"
40'-6" 12'-0"
35'-0"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 2311
2,311 S.F.
5 Bdrm|3 Bath|Loft
2-Car Garage
A3.1
Second Floor 1,323 S.F. First Floor 988 S.F.
1734
OWL RANCH A3.2

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 0 4 8 16
VALLEY
5:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
5:12
5:12
5:12
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
HIP
R
HIP
HIP
HIP
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
5:12
5:12
5:12
5:12

3.5:12

3.5:123.5:12
5:12
VALLEY
4:12
RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
A3.2
PLAN 2311
Roof Plans
Elevation C| Craftsman Craftsman Elevation Elevation B| Traditional Traditional Elevation Elevation A| Farmhouse Farmhouse Elevation 1735
OWL RANCH A3.3

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 PLAN 2311
Front Elevations
Elevation A| Farmhouse
Color Scheme 7B
Elevation B| Traditional
Color Scheme 4B
Elevation C| Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
1736
OWL RANCH A3.4

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
8'-1" 9'-1"8'-1" 9'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
8'-1" 9'-1"8'-1" 9'-1"
27'-6"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 2311
Farmhouse Elevations
A3.4
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation A - Farmhouse (Color Scheme 7B)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Board and Batten Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
5 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
6 Entry Door: Fiberglass
7 Address Light
8 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 2311
'A' - Farmhouse Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 6
5 7
8 3
2 3
1 1
2 4
3 1
4 1
4 2
4 3
1737
OWL RANCH A3.5

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
8'-1" 9'-1"8'-1" 9'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
8'-1" 9'-1"8'-1" 9'-1"
26'-9"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 2311
Traditional Elevations
A3.5
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation B - Traditional (Color Scheme 4B)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
5 Shutters: Decorative Foam
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Address Light
9 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 2311
'B' - Traditional Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 7
6 8
9 5
1 1
2 3
4 1
3 2
4 3
4 1
2 4
3 1738
OWL RANCH A3.6

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
8'-1" 9'-1"8'-1" 9'-1"

UTILITY BOXES

GAS METER
8'-1" 9'-1"8'-1" 9'-1"
25'-10"

AC CONDENSER
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
PLAN 2311
Craftsman Elevations
A3.6
Front Elevation
Rear Elevation
Left Elevation
Right Elevation
Exterior Materials:

Elevation C - Craftsman (Color Scheme 6C)
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Gable Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Manufactured Stone Veneer
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
PLAN 2311
'C' - Craftsman Elevations
Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors,
Materials And Application May Vary.
2 8 7
6 9
10 3
2 3
1 2
5 3
1 1
8 4
1 8
5 2
5 3
5 1739
OWL RANCH A4.1

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
Farmhouse Elevation Details
EAVE

OVERHANG

PER ROOF PLAN
NOTE: REFER TO ROOF

MFR'S SPECIFICATIONS

FOR INSTALLATION OF
COMP. SHINGLE

METAL GUTTER

WHERE OCCURS

INTERIOR FINISH

WHERE OCCURS

BUILDING PAPER

INSULATION

WHERE OCCURS

CONTINUOUS BEAD

OF SEALANT

FIBER-CEMENT
SIDING PER ELEV.
2x FASCIA
PER ELEV.

UNDERLAYMENT

STARTER BOARD

ROOF FRAMING -

SEE STRUCTURAL

COMPOSITION ROOF

SHINGLES

STARTER COURSE

ROOF SHEATHING

INSULATION STOP
DIM. PER
SHINGLE MFR.

METAL FLASHING

WITH DRIP

CONTINUOUS BEAD

OF SEALANT
RAKE
18123-RF-FLAT-RAKE-WOOD-04
1-1/2"=1'-0"

COMPOSITION

ROOF SHINGLES

OUTLOOKER BACKSPAN
PER STRUCT.

ROOF FRAMING

SEE STRUCTURAL

OVERHANG

PER ROOF PLAN
2X BARGE SIZE

PER ELEVATIONS

BUILDING PAPER
2X3 BLOCKING
2X4 OUTLOOKERS
AT 24" O.C.

STARTER BOARD

UNDERLAYMENT
2"
MIN.
3"

METAL FLASHING

WITH DRIP

ROOF SHEATHING

FIBER CEMENT PANEL

FIBER CEMENT BATTENS

ROOF EAVE/RAKE DETAIL -

BOARD & BATT STUCCO
WINDOW INSTALLATION - 3"=1'-0"
18123-1C-WI-WIN0-STO1-00

WINDOW FRAME

HEADER PER
GYP. BD.
1"
TYP.

SL.

WINDOW FRAME
GYP. BD. 2x FRAMING

INSULATION WHERE
1"
TYP.

OCCURS

INSULATION
GYP. BD.
2x SILL
WHERE
OCCURS
DOUBLE
1" RIGID FOAM
SL.

WINDOW SILL

WINDOW JAMB

WINDOW HEAD

OF SEALANT

WINDOW FRAME
STRUCT.

CONTINUOUS BEAD
1" RIGID FOAM
1" RIGID FOAM
1"
TYP.

CONTINUOUS BEAD OF

SEALANT

STUCCO SYSTEM

CONTINUOUS BEAD OF

SEALANT

STUCCO SYSTEM

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS
2X FRAMING

BLOCKING OR BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9" FROM OPENING

FOR PRIMARY JAMB FLASHING

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY SILL

FLASHING
2X FRAMING

VAPOR BARRIER

VAPOR BARRIER

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/

RIGID FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER
ELEVATION, O/ BROWN COAT.

INSTALL PER MFR'S

INSTRUCTION

VAPOR BARRIER

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY HEAD

FLASHING

BUILDING PAPER

BUILDING PAPER

BUILDING PAPER

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/

RIGID FOAM TRIM, SIZE

PER ELEVATION, O/
BROWN COAT. INSTALL

PER MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER ELEVATION,
O/ BROWN COAT. INSTALL PER

MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO SYSTEM
DOOR HEAD/JAMB DETAIL 3"=1'-0"
2X4 WALL WITH STUCCO

DOOR JAMB

DOOR HEAD
GYP. BD.

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS

WOOD DOOR FRAME

STUCCO SYSTEM

VAPOR BARRIER SET IN SEALANT
1"
TYP.
1 4
"

CORROSION RESISTANT
METAL "J" SCREED
1"
TYP.

HEADER PER
GYP. BD.

WOOD

WEATHERSTRIP
DOOR
CASING
STRUCT.
1 4
"

STUCCO SYSTEM
1" RIGID FOAM

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 15"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY HEAD

FLASHING
2X FRAMING

BUILDING PAPER
SL.

VAPOR BARRIER SET

IN SEALANT
METAL "J" WEEP SCREED

CORROSION RESISTANT

WOOD DOOR FRAME

BLOCKING OR BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 12" FROM

OPENING FOR PRIMARY JAMB

FLASHING

WEATHERSTRIP
DOOR
2X FRAMING

WOOD CASING

BUILDING PAPER
1C-DR-DOOR0-STO1-01
NOTE: PROVIDE FURRING FOR ENTIRE

WALL PLANE AT ALL SHEAR WALL
LOCATIONS.

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER ELEVATION,
O/ BROWN COAT. INSTALL PER

MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER
ELEVATION, O/ BROWN COAT.

INSTALL PER MFR'S

INSTRUCTION

WINDOW & DOOR TRIM STYLE

TRIM SIZES
KEY
A

HD FOAM
1x4

FIBER CEMENT
5/4 x 3.5"
B 2x2 FLAT 5/4 x 3.5"
A
B
2"

RAIL STYLE KEY
A
B
6x6
4x6
A
B
A4.1

WOOD TRIM AT BOARD & BATT

WINDOW INSTALLATION -
WI-WIN-WOOD-02
3"=1'-0"

WINDOW SILL

WINDOW JAMB

WINDOW HEAD
1740
OWL RANCH A4.2

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
Traditional Elevation Details
EAVE

OVERHANG

PER ROOF PLAN
NOTE: REFER TO ROOF

MFR'S SPECIFICATIONS

FOR INSTALLATION OF
COMP. SHINGLE

METAL GUTTER

WHERE OCCURS

INTERIOR FINISH

WHERE OCCURS

BUILDING PAPER

INSULATION

WHERE OCCURS

CONTINUOUS BEAD

OF SEALANT

FIBER-CEMENT
SIDING PER ELEV.
2x FASCIA
PER ELEV.

METAL FLASHING

WITH DRIP

UNDERLAYMENT

SHINGLE

STARTER BOARD

ROOF FRAMING -

SEE STRUCTURAL

COMPOSITION ROOF

SHINGLES
DIM. PER

STARTER COURSE

ROOF SHEATHING
MFR.

INSULATION STOP
RAKE
RF-FLAT-RAKE-WOOD-01
1-1/2"=1'-0"

CONTINUOUS BEAD

OF SEALANT

COMPOSITION

ROOF SHINGLES

OUTLOOKER BACKSPAN
PER STRUCT.

ROOF FRAMING

SEE STRUCTURAL

OVERHANG

PER ROOF PLAN
2X BARGE SIZE

PER ELEVATIONS

BUILDING PAPER
2X3 BLOCKING
2X4 OUTLOOKERS
AT 24" O.C.

STARTER BOARD

UNDERLAYMENT
2"
MIN.
3"

METAL FLASHING

WITH DRIP

ROOF SHEATHING

FIBER CEMENT SIDING

ROOF EAVE/RAKE DETAIL -

SIDING STUCCO
WINDOW INSTALLATION - 3"=1'-0"
18123-1C-WI-WIN0-STO1-00

WINDOW FRAME

HEADER PER
GYP. BD.
1"
TYP.

SL.

WINDOW FRAME
GYP. BD. 2x FRAMING

INSULATION WHERE
1"
TYP.

OCCURS

INSULATION
GYP. BD.
2x SILL
WHERE
OCCURS
DOUBLE
1" RIGID FOAM
SL.

WINDOW SILL

WINDOW JAMB

WINDOW HEAD

OF SEALANT

WINDOW FRAME
STRUCT.

CONTINUOUS BEAD
1" RIGID FOAM
1" RIGID FOAM
1"
TYP.

CONTINUOUS BEAD OF

SEALANT

STUCCO SYSTEM

CONTINUOUS BEAD OF

SEALANT

STUCCO SYSTEM

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS
2X FRAMING

BLOCKING OR BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9" FROM OPENING

FOR PRIMARY JAMB FLASHING

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY SILL

FLASHING
2X FRAMING

VAPOR BARRIER

VAPOR BARRIER

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/

RIGID FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER
ELEVATION, O/ BROWN COAT.

INSTALL PER MFR'S

INSTRUCTION

VAPOR BARRIER

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY HEAD

FLASHING

BUILDING PAPER

BUILDING PAPER

BUILDING PAPER

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/

RIGID FOAM TRIM, SIZE

PER ELEVATION, O/
BROWN COAT. INSTALL

PER MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER ELEVATION,
O/ BROWN COAT. INSTALL PER

MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO SYSTEM
DOOR HEAD/JAMB DETAIL 3"=1'-0"
2X4 WALL WITH STUCCO

DOOR JAMB

DOOR HEAD
GYP. BD.

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS

WOOD DOOR FRAME

STUCCO SYSTEM

VAPOR BARRIER SET IN SEALANT
1"
TYP.
1 4
"

CORROSION RESISTANT
METAL "J" SCREED
1"
TYP.

HEADER PER
GYP. BD.

WOOD

WEATHERSTRIP
DOOR
CASING
STRUCT.
1 4
"

STUCCO SYSTEM
1" RIGID FOAM

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 15"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY HEAD

FLASHING
2X FRAMING

BUILDING PAPER
SL.

VAPOR BARRIER SET

IN SEALANT
METAL "J" WEEP SCREED

CORROSION RESISTANT

WOOD DOOR FRAME

BLOCKING OR BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 12" FROM

OPENING FOR PRIMARY JAMB

FLASHING

WEATHERSTRIP
DOOR
2X FRAMING

WOOD CASING

BUILDING PAPER
1C-DR-DOOR0-STO1-01
NOTE: PROVIDE FURRING FOR ENTIRE

WALL PLANE AT ALL SHEAR WALL
LOCATIONS.

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER ELEVATION,
O/ BROWN COAT. INSTALL PER

MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER
ELEVATION, O/ BROWN COAT.

INSTALL PER MFR'S

INSTRUCTION
A
A
B
1"
B

TRIM SIZES
KEY
A

HD FOAM
1x4

FIBER CEMENT
5/4 x 3.5"
WINDOW & DOOR TRIM STYLE B 2x2 FLAT 5/4 x 3.5"

RAIL STYLE KEY
A
B
1x4
D
2x2
2x4
2x6
4x6
C
D
E
A
E
B
C
A4.2

WOOD TRIM AT SIDING

WINDOW INSTALLATION -

WINDOW SILL

WINDOW JAMB
WI-WIN-WOOD-01
3"=1'-0"

WINDOW HEAD
1741
OWL RANCH A4.3

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
Craftsman Elevation Details
EAVE

OVERHANG

PER ROOF PLAN
NOTE: REFER TO ROOF

MFR'S SPECIFICATIONS

FOR INSTALLATION OF
COMP. SHINGLE

METAL GUTTER

WHERE OCCURS

INTERIOR FINISH

WHERE OCCURS

BUILDING PAPER

INSULATION

WHERE OCCURS

CONTINUOUS BEAD

OF SEALANT

FIBER-CEMENT
SIDING PER ELEV.
2x FASCIA
PER ELEV.

METAL FLASHING

WITH DRIP

UNDERLAYMENT

SHINGLE

STARTER BOARD

ROOF FRAMING -

SEE STRUCTURAL

COMPOSITION ROOF

SHINGLES
DIM. PER

STARTER COURSE

ROOF SHEATHING
MFR.

INSULATION STOP
RAKE
RF-FLAT-RAKE-WOOD-01
1-1/2"=1'-0"

CONTINUOUS BEAD

OF SEALANT

COMPOSITION

ROOF SHINGLES

OUTLOOKER BACKSPAN
PER STRUCT.

ROOF FRAMING

SEE STRUCTURAL

OVERHANG

PER ROOF PLAN
2X BARGE SIZE

PER ELEVATIONS

BUILDING PAPER
2X3 BLOCKING
2X4 OUTLOOKERS
AT 24" O.C.

STARTER BOARD

UNDERLAYMENT
2"
MIN.
3"

METAL FLASHING

WITH DRIP

ROOF SHEATHING

FIBER CEMENT SIDING

ROOF EAVE/RAKE DETAIL -

SIDING STUCCO
WINDOW INSTALLATION - 3"=1'-0"
18123-1C-WI-WIN0-STO1-00

WINDOW FRAME

HEADER PER
GYP. BD.
1"
TYP.

SL.

WINDOW FRAME
GYP. BD. 2x FRAMING

INSULATION WHERE
1"
TYP.

OCCURS

INSULATION
GYP. BD.
2x SILL
WHERE
OCCURS
DOUBLE
1" RIGID FOAM
SL.

WINDOW SILL

WINDOW JAMB

WINDOW HEAD

OF SEALANT

WINDOW FRAME
STRUCT.

CONTINUOUS BEAD
1" RIGID FOAM
1" RIGID FOAM
1"
TYP.

CONTINUOUS BEAD OF

SEALANT

STUCCO SYSTEM

CONTINUOUS BEAD OF

SEALANT

STUCCO SYSTEM

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS
2X FRAMING

BLOCKING OR BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9" FROM OPENING

FOR PRIMARY JAMB FLASHING

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY SILL

FLASHING
2X FRAMING

VAPOR BARRIER

VAPOR BARRIER

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/

RIGID FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER
ELEVATION, O/ BROWN COAT.

INSTALL PER MFR'S

INSTRUCTION

VAPOR BARRIER

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 9"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY HEAD

FLASHING

BUILDING PAPER

BUILDING PAPER

BUILDING PAPER

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/

RIGID FOAM TRIM, SIZE

PER ELEVATION, O/
BROWN COAT. INSTALL

PER MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER ELEVATION,
O/ BROWN COAT. INSTALL PER

MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO SYSTEM
DOOR HEAD/JAMB DETAIL 3"=1'-0"
2X4 WALL WITH STUCCO

DOOR JAMB

DOOR HEAD
GYP. BD.

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS

WOOD DOOR FRAME

STUCCO SYSTEM

VAPOR BARRIER SET IN SEALANT
1"
TYP.
1 4
"

CORROSION RESISTANT
METAL "J" SCREED
1"
TYP.

HEADER PER
GYP. BD.

WOOD

WEATHERSTRIP
DOOR
CASING
STRUCT.
1 4
"

STUCCO SYSTEM
1" RIGID FOAM

INSULATION WHERE
OCCURS

BLOCKING OR

BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 15"

FROM OPENING FOR

PRIMARY HEAD

FLASHING
2X FRAMING

BUILDING PAPER
SL.

VAPOR BARRIER SET

IN SEALANT
METAL "J" WEEP SCREED

CORROSION RESISTANT

WOOD DOOR FRAME

BLOCKING OR BACKING SHALL
EXTEND A MIN. OF 12" FROM

OPENING FOR PRIMARY JAMB

FLASHING

WEATHERSTRIP
DOOR
2X FRAMING

WOOD CASING

BUILDING PAPER
1C-DR-DOOR0-STO1-01
NOTE: PROVIDE FURRING FOR ENTIRE

WALL PLANE AT ALL SHEAR WALL
LOCATIONS.

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER ELEVATION,
O/ BROWN COAT. INSTALL PER

MFR'S INSTRUCTION

STUCCO COLOR COAT O/ RIGID

FOAM TRIM, SIZE PER
ELEVATION, O/ BROWN COAT.

INSTALL PER MFR'S

INSTRUCTION
8"
3"
3"

WINDOW & DOOR TRIM STYLE

TRIM SIZES
KEY
A
B

HD FOAM
1x4

FIBER CEMENT
5/4 x 3.5"
C
2x3
2x6
-
-
A
B
C
A

RAIL STYLE KEY
A
B
4x4
4x6 (TAPERED)
B
A4.3

WOOD TRIM AT SIDING

WINDOW INSTALLATION -

WINDOW SILL

WINDOW JAMB
WI-WIN-WOOD-01
3"=1'-0"

WINDOW HEAD
1742
OWL RANCH A4.4

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"
EAT-IN

KITCHEN GARAGE
BEDROOM 2 HALL BEDROOM 1 9'-1" 8'-1"
9'-1" 8'-1"

COUNTRY
KITCHEN GARAGE BEDROOM 4
BEDROOM 3 BATH 2 BEDROOM 2
9'-1" 8'-1"9'-1" 8'-1"

GREAT ROOM
BEDROOM 4 BATH 1
GARAGE
HALL BEDROOM 2 W.I.C.

C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. | 2020398 | 03-24-22 SKELLY, 40 LOTS

HERCULES, CA
0 2 4 8
A4.4
Plan 1583
Plan 2311 Plan 1859
Building Sections
1743
OWL RANCH A5.1

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 'A' - Farmhouse Elevations 'B' - Traditional Elevations Manufacturer: Sea Gull Lighting (or similar)
Product Name: Fredricksburg Collection
(Small One Light Outdoor Wall Lantern)
Product Number: 8547701-04
Finish: Satin Aluminum Finish
Dimensions: W: 10” H 11 15/16”
Manufacturer: Sea Gull Lighting (or similar)
Product Name: Childress Collection
(One Light Outdoor Wall Lantern)
Product Number: 8736301-12
Finish: Black Finish, Satin Etched Glass
Dimensions: W: 9” H 21”
Lighting Fixtures
'C' - Craftsman Elevations
Manufacturer: Sea Gull Lighting (or similar)
Product Name: Medford Lakes Collection
(One Light Outdoor Wall Lantern)
Product Number: 88880-51
Finish: Statuary Bronze Finish, Etched
Hammered with Light Amber Glass
Dimensions: W: 7” H 11”
1744
OWL RANCH A5.2

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 Exterior Color & Materials
Elevation 'A' - Farmhouse

OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
May 19, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
SCHEME 7B

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM

SHUTTERS
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional

OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
May 19, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
SCHEME 3B

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR

SHUTTERS
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional
1 OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 3 OF 6
REVISIONS:

Number Date Description
1 05/19/22 Project name update.

Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 7B
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Slate
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Low Gloss White Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 7643
Pussywillow Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 9129
Jade Dragon Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 7636
Origami White Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 7675
Sealskin Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.
‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL
1 OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 1 OF 6
REVISIONS:

Number Date Description
1 05/19/22 Project name update.

Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 3B ‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Pewter Gray
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Low Gloss White Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 7065
Argos Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 7624
Slate Tile Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 7008
Alabaster Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 6258
Tricorn Black Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

Color Scheme 3B
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 7B
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Plan 1859 - 'A' Farmhouse
Color Scheme 3B
Plan 1583 - 'A' Farmhouse
Color Scheme 7B
Plan 2311 - 'A' Farmhouse
Color Scheme 7B
Exterior Materials:
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Board and Batten Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Shutters: Decorative Foam
8 Entry Door: Fiberglass
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
2 6
9 10
7 3
4 5
2 6
9 10
4 8
1 5
2 6
9 10
4 1
8 3
5 8
1745
OWL RANCH A5.3

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 Exterior Color & Materials
Elevation 'B' - Traditional

OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
May 19, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
SCHEME 4B

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional

SHUTTERS

OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
May 19, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional
SCHEME 1BC

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR

SHUTTERS
1 OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 2 OF 6
REVISIONS:

Number Date Description
1 05/19/22 Project name update.

Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 4B
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Weathered Wood
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 7569
Stucco Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 7595
Sommelier Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 7508
Tavern Taupe Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 9175
Deep Forest Brown Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.
‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL
1 OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 4 OF 6
REVISIONS:

Number Date Description
1 05/19/22 Project name update.

Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 1BC
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Pewter Gray
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 0050
Classic Light Bluff Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 6206
Oyster Bay Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 6170
Techno Gray Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 0072
Deep Maroon Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.
‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL
Color Scheme 1BC
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 4B
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Plan 1859 - 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 1BC
Plan 1583 - 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 4B
Plan 2311 - 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 4B Exterior Materials:
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
5 Shutters: Decorative Foam
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Address Light
9 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
2 6
8 9
3 1
5 4
7 3
5 7
1 2
6 8
9 4
4 3
7 2
6 8
9 1
1746
OWL RANCH A5.4

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 05-27-22 Exterior Color & Materials
Elevation 'C' - Craftsman

OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
May 19, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
‘C’ Elevations Only
Craftsman
SCHEME 6C
STONE

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
SIDING
TRIM
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR

OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
May 19, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
‘C’ Elevations Only
Craftsman
SCHEME 5C

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
SIDING
TRIM
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR
STONE
1 OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 6 OF 6
REVISIONS:

Number Date Description
1 05/19/22 Project name update.

Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 6C ‘C’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, CRAFTSMAN
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Mission Brown
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Manufactured Stone Moonlight
RoughCut Eldorado
Mortar @ Stone (standard raked joints) Khaki Orco
Body Color (applied to):

Corner Boards
Lap Siding
Stucco (lightlace finish)
SW 7673
Pewter Cast Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #1 (applied to):

Fascia
Outlookers
SW 7027
Hickory Smoke Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #2 (applied to):

Gable Board & Battens
Garage Doors
SW 7048
Urbane Bronze Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #3 (applied to):

Railing
Trim
SW 7002
Downy Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
SW 6244
Naval Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.
1 OWL RANCH
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 5 OF 6
REVISIONS:

Number Date Description
1 05/19/22 Project name update.

Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 5C ‘C’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, CRAFTSMAN
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Charcoal
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Manufactured Stone Whitebark
Cliffstone Eldorado
Mortar @ Stone (standard raked joints) Soft White Orco
Body Color (applied to):

Corner Boards
Lap Siding
Stucco (lightlace finish)
SW 6200
Link Gray Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #1 (applied to):

Fascia
Outlookers
Garage Doors
SW 7505
Manor House Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #2 (applied to):

Gable Board & Battens
Railing
Trim
SW 9180
Aged White Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
SW 7083
Darkroom Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

Color Scheme 5C
Elevation 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
Elevation 'C' Craftsman
Plan 1859 - 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 5C
Plan 1583 - 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
Plan 2311 - 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
Exterior Materials:
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Gable Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Manufactured Stone Veneer
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
2 6
9 10
1 5
4 3
7 8 2
6 9
10 3
1 5
4 8
7 2
6 9
10 5
4 3
7 8
1 1747
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA

STREET SCENE
1748
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 3B PLAN 1583A| FARMHOUSE
1749
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 7B PLAN 1583B| TRADITIONAL
1750
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 5C PLAN 1583C| CRAFTSMAN
1751
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 1BC PLAN 1859A| FARMHOUSE
1752
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 4B PLAN 1859B| TRADITIONAL
1753
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 6C PLAN 1859C| CRAFTSMAN
1754
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 4B PLAN 2311A| FARMHOUSE
1755
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 3B PLAN 2311B| TRADITIONAL
1756
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 4-15-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
COLOR SCHEME 5C PLAN 2311C| CRAFTSMAN
1757
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 2-28-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
FRONT PLAN 2311| CRAFTSMAN
1758
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 2-28-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
BACK PLAN 2311| CRAFTSMAN
1759
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 2-28-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
LEFT PLAN 2311| CRAFTSMAN
1760
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

NOTE: BUILDING COLORS SHOWN ARE ARTIST CONCEPTION. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR MATERIAL BOARDS, MANUFACTURE’S SPECIFICATIONS AND COLOR AND LOCATION PACKAGE FOR EXACT LOCATION AND SAMPLES FOR MORE ACCURATE COLORS. 2020398 | 2-28-22
SKELLY

HERCULES, CA
RIGHT PLAN 2311| CRAFTSMAN
1761
SKELLY, 40 LOTS A5.1

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 04-04-22 Exterior Color & Materials
Elevation 'A' - Farmhouse
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
SCHEME 7B

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM

SHUTTERS
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
SCHEME 3B

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR

SHUTTERS
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 3 OF 6
Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 7B
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Slate
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Low Gloss White Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 7643
Pussywillow Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 9129
Jade Dragon Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 7636
Origami White Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 7675
Sealskin Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.
‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 1 OF 6
Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 3B ‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Pewter Gray
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Low Gloss White Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 7065
Argos Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 7624
Slate Tile Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 7008
Alabaster Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 6258
Tricorn Black Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

Color Scheme 3B
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 7B
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Plan 1859 - 'A' Farmhouse
Color Scheme 3B
Plan 1583 - 'A' Farmhouse
Color Scheme 7B
Plan 2311 - 'A' Farmhouse
Color Scheme 7B
Exterior Materials:
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Board and Batten Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Shutters: Decorative Foam
8 Entry Door: Fiberglass
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
2 6
9 10
7 3
4 5
2 6
9 10
4 8
1 5
2 6
9 10
4 1
8 3
5 8
1762
SKELLY, 40 LOTS A5.2

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 04-04-22 Exterior Color & Materials
Elevation 'B' - Traditional
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
SCHEME 4B

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional

SHUTTERS
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only
Farmhouse & Traditional
SCHEME 1BC

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
TRIM
SIDING
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR

SHUTTERS
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 2 OF 6
Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 4B
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Weathered Wood
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 7569
Stucco Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 7595
Sommelier Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 7508
Tavern Taupe Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 9175
Deep Forest Brown Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.
‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 4 OF 6
Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 1BC
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Pewter Gray
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Stucco (lightlace finish) SW 0050
Classic Light Bluff Sherwin Williams
Siding Color (applied to):

Board & Battens
Corner Boards
Gable Siding
Lap Siding
SW 6206
Oyster Bay Sherwin Williams
Trim Color (applied to):

Fascia
Garage Doors
Railing
Trim
SW 6170
Techno Gray Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
Shutters
SW 0072
Deep Maroon Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.
‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, FARMHOUSE & TRADITIONAL
Color Scheme 1BC
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 4B
Elevation 'A' Farmhouse & 'B' Traditional
Plan 1859 - 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 1BC
Plan 1583 - 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 4B
Plan 2311 - 'B' Traditional
Color Scheme 4B Exterior Materials:
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
5 Shutters: Decorative Foam
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Address Light
9 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
2 6
8 9
3 1
5 4
7 3
5 7
1 2
6 8
9 4
4 3
7 2
6 8
9 1
1763
SKELLY, 40 LOTS A5.3

HERCULES, CA
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020398 | 04-04-22 Exterior Color & Materials
Elevation 'C' - Craftsman
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
‘C’ Elevations Only
Craftsman
SCHEME 6C
STONE

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
SIDING
TRIM
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA
‘C’ Elevations Only
Craftsman
SCHEME 5C

ROOFING
FASCIA
STUCCO
SIDING
TRIM
GARAGE
DOORS
FRONT
DOOR
STONE
SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 6 OF 6
Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 6C ‘C’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, CRAFTSMAN
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Mission Brown
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Manufactured Stone Moonlight
RoughCut Eldorado
Mortar @ Stone (standard raked joints) Khaki Orco
Body Color (applied to):

Corner Boards
Lap Siding
Stucco (lightlace finish)
SW 7673
Pewter Cast Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #1 (applied to):

Fascia
Outlookers
SW 7027
Hickory Smoke Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #2 (applied to):

Gable Board & Battens
Garage Doors
SW 7048
Urbane Bronze Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #3 (applied to):

Railing
Trim
SW 7002
Downy Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
SW 6244
Naval Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

SKELLY
Hercules, California
D.R. HORTON
March 28, 2022 | 2020398
PAGE 5 OF 6
Exterior Color & Materials
SCHEME 5C ‘C’ ELEVATIONS ONLY, CRAFTSMAN
Material Color Manufacturer
Roofing:

Composition Shingles
Charcoal
Timberline Series GAF
Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish) Bronze Custom-Bilt Metals Manufactured Stone Whitebark
Cliffstone Eldorado
Mortar @ Stone (standard raked joints) Soft White Orco
Body Color (applied to):

Corner Boards
Lap Siding
Stucco (lightlace finish)
SW 6200
Link Gray Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #1 (applied to):

Fascia
Outlookers
Garage Doors
SW 7505
Manor House Sherwin Williams
Trim Color #2 (applied to):

Gable Board & Battens
Railing
Trim
SW 9180
Aged White Sherwin Williams
Accent Color (applied to):

Front Door
SW 7083
Darkroom Sherwin Williams
Garage Man Door Match Stucco Color Sherwin Williams
NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these
schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase.

Contact Corie Rath (925) 463-1700.
© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA.

Color Scheme 5C
Elevation 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
Elevation 'C' Craftsman
Plan 1859 - 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 5C
Plan 1583 - 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
Plan 2311 - 'C' Craftsman
Color Scheme 6C
Exterior Materials:
1 Roof: Composition Shingle Roofing
2 Stucco: Lightlace Finish
3 Lap Siding: Fiber Cement
4 Gable Siding: Fiber Cement
5 Windows: Insulated Vinyl
6 Garage Door: Metal Sectional Roll-Up
7 Entry Door: Fiberglass
8 Manufactured Stone Veneer
9 Address Light
10 Wall Mounted Light Fixture
2 6
9 10
1 5
4 3
7 8 2
6 9
10 3
1 5
4 8
7 2
6 9
10 5
4 3
7 8
1 1764
215 Skelly
City Council Public Hearing
September 27, 2022
Presented by Tricia Stevens, MIG
1765

1. Staff Report

2. Applicant Presentation

3. Council Questions

4. Public Comment

5. Close Public Hearing

6. Council Action
Agenda
1766
Project Site
• 7.44 acres at 215 Skelly west of
Skelly and Pearce
• RS-L Residential Single-Family Low
Density Designation
• Currently vacant; existing home
recently demolished
• Adjacent to Pinole Creek Trail and
BNSF rail line
• Existing cell tower to remain
1767
Looking north Looking southwest
Rosti where EVA connects
Looking southeasterly
Site
Photos
1768
Proposed
Project
• 40 Residential Lots
• Private Streets
• Two Below Market Rate Units
• Trail Connections
• Traffic Calming
• Stormwater Detention/Open
Space
• Buffer Adjacent to Cell Tower
• Emergency Vehicle Access
1769
Lot Sizes 3,983 - 6,880 Square Feet
Home Sizes 1,583 – 2,311 Square Feet
Three models with three options each
3-5 bedrooms
Building Height 25-28 Feet
Site Coverage 17 – 33 percent
Access Private Streets
Parking Two Garage Spaces per Unit; plus one
additional for five bedrooms
Project Information
1770
Renderings
1771
Text Amendment/Deviations
Requirement Proposed Percentage
deviation
Lot size 6,000 sq ft 3,983 – 6,880
sf
33 lots are
less than
6,000 sf.

Up to 33%
Lot width 60-feet 40-feet Up to 33%
Lot depth 100 feet 95-96 feet 5%
Corner lot side
yard
15 feet 10-13 feet Up to 33%
Text
Amendment
would allow
Planned
Development
exceptions to
exceed 10
percent
1772
Traffic and Circulation
On-site bump-out and trail
Bay Trail Connection
Bump-out at Entry
Off-site bump-out
Neighborhood Connection
1773
Landscaping
Stormwater Area
Project Entry
Tree Replacement: Removed trees
to be replaced with 96 36-inch box
trees.
1774
Comments From Planning Commission Meeting
• Pedestrian Access to the San Pablo
Trail
• Screening On South Side Adjacent to
the Rail Line
• Security During Construction
• Traffic Concerns – Need for Stop Sign
(Public Comment)
• Runoff Into Creek (Public Comment)
• Design of Emergency Vehicle Access – Condition Added
• Design of Entrance Sign – Condition Added
HOA Land
San Pablo Trail on City
Property
1775
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration
• Released for public review on July 5, 2022, with a 30-day public review period ending on August 3, 2022
• Potentially significant impacts associated with Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology/Soils, Noise, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources
• Seven comments received
1776
Findings
• Compliance with General Plan
• Compliance with Zoning Requirements (with Text Amendment) • Quality residential environment compatible with its
surrounding; provides needed housing; includes two Below Market Rate units
• Inclusion of a public pathway connecting to existing trails • Traffic calming measures to help slow down traffic in the neighborhood
1777
Recommendations

1. Adopt a Resolution Approving:
• Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map
• Planned Development Plan
• Design Review Permit
• Lot Line Adjustment
• IS/MND and MMRP

2. Adopt an Ordinance approving Zone Text Amendment to change text in Section 13.48 (Planned Development Plans) to alter the allowed deviations permitted with a Planned Development, by eliminating the limitations on the amount of a deviation.
1778
215 Skelly/Owl Ranch
Hercules City Council Hearing 9.27.22

1. Project Intro

2. Project Details

3. Questions
1779
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file.

Existing
Conditions
• Previously used for a residence/animal keeping
• Three recent fires on site
• Structures have burned down/been demolished
1780
Constraints
Lots of Them
1781
Site Plan
40 Lots
Sized similar
to neighbors
1782
Community
Engagement
Ongoing
Communication
15 Oct. 2021
Neighborhood
outreach walk
16 Nov. 2021
Hercules by the
Bay HOA
Meeting
presentation
24 Jan. 2022
Project update
sheet to HBTB
HOA
15 Mar. 2022
Hercules by the
Bay HOA Meeting
follow-up
1783
Affordable
Units
2 BMRs
Voluntary project
design feature
DR Horton offering
City 1 Moderate & 1
Low Income singlefamily residence
So:
2 affordable units
38 market rate units
1784
Trail/Park
Connectivity
Bay Trail Connection
Fernandez Park Connection
1785
Traffic
Calming
Safe Streets
= Project Design Feature: Bulbouts
1786
Traffic
• Traffic Study
• No significant impacts
1787
Parking
• 2-car garages, 2-car driveways, on-street parking
• Designed to avoid spillover onto Skelly & Pearce
1788
Noise
• Mindful of the site’s proximity to houses
• Will adhere to City’s construction hours
• Manager’s contact info posted at site entrance
1789
Architecture
4-Sided
1790
April 2022
Submitted Application
Spring 2023
Begin Demolition
Mid-2023
Begin Grading
Early-2024
Begin Home Building
Late-2024/Early-2025
Complete Home Building
Project
Timeline
Current Estimates
1791
111 Civic Drive City of Hercules Hercules, CA 94547
Meeting Minutes
City Council
Mayor Dion Bailey
Vice Mayor Alexander Walker-Griffin
Council Member Dan Romero
Council Member Chris Kelley
Council Member Tiffany Grimsley
Dante Hall, City Manager
Patrick Tang, City Attorney
Lauren Berges, City Clerk
Tuesday, September 13, 2022 6:00 PM
In Person In Council Chambers or
Zoom ID: 833 8615 2711
Zoom Passcode: 454189
Zoom Phone Number: 1-669-900-6833
To view webcast of meetings, live or on demand, go to the City's website at www.ci.hercules.ca.us I. SPECIAL MEETING - CLOSED SESSION – 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley

Present: 4 -

Absent: 1 - Council Member T. Grimsley
II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
None.

III. CONVENE INTO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Bailey, City Councilmembers and Staff adjourned to closed session.

The Hercules City Council will meet in Closed Session regarding the following:

1. 22-268 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Title: City Attorney

2. 22-273 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Title: City Manager
City of Hercules Page 1
1792
City Council Meeting Minutes September 13, 2022
IV. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley

Present: 4 -

Absent: 1 - Council Member T. Grimsley
V. REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Tang announced no final or reportable actions in closed session and the items will be continued to future closed session dates.

VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Romero VII. MOMENT OF SILENCE
Mayor Bailey requested a moment of silence for Rose Fuentes Villa, who recently passed away.

VIII. INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS/COMMISSION REPORTS

1. 22-266 Proclamation Recognizing the Month of September as Library Card Sign-Up Month
Contra Costa County Library Manager Alison Peters provided comment.

Mayor Bailey read the proclamation into the record.

IX. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
City Manager Hall had no additions or deletions.

X. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
None.

This time is reserved for members of the public to address issues not included in the agenda. In accordance with the Brown Act, Council will refer to staff any matters brought before them at this time, and those matters may be placed on a future agenda.

Individuals wishing to address the City Council in-person are asked to complete a form indicating the name and address of the speaker and the general topic to be addressed. Speakers attending via Zoom are asked to use their "raise hand" icon. Speakers will be allowed 3 minutes to discuss their concerns. All public comments are recorded and become part of the public record. A limit of 30 minutes will be devoted to taking public comment at this point in the agenda. If any speakers remain at the conclusion of the initial 30 minute period, time will be reserved at the conclusion of the meeting to take the remaining comments.

XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

City of Hercules Page 2
1793
City Council Meeting Minutes September 13, 2022
XII. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Romero, seconded by Council Member Kelley, to adopt the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: 1 - Council Member T. Grimsley

1. 22-267 Minutes
Recommendation: Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of August 9, 2022.

Approved.

2. 22-269 Emergency Declaration Extension
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing virtual city council, commission and committee meetings during a declared state of emergency pursuant to government code 54953 (AB 361).

Approved.

3. 22-262 Contract Amendment No. 2 with Carollo Engineers Recommendation: Approve Contract Amendment No. 2 with Carollo Engineers to complete the design and secure easements for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project in the amount of $58,913 for a total, not to exceed contract amount of $1,010,297.

Approved.

4. 22-263 Acceptance of Bayfront Loop Offer of Dedication including the Public Improvements for Subdivision No. 9499 "The Grand" and approval of a maintenance agreement for the frontage landscaping Recommendation: To adopt the following resolutions 1. Accepting the offer of dedication for Bayfront Loop including the public improvements for Subdivision 9499; and 2. Approving a Maintenance Agreement allowing the Property Owner to maintain their frontage landscaping in Bayfront Loop.

Approved.

City of Hercules Page 3
1794
City Council Meeting Minutes September 13, 2022
XIII. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS

1. 22-270 Approve a memorandum of understanding with Teamster Local 315, Executive, Mid-Management & Non-Represented Pay Plans
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding with Teamsters Local 315, Pay Plans for Executive, Mid-Management and Non-Represented Employees.

Presentation by City Manager Hall. Councilmembers provided comment.

No public comment.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Romero, seconded by Council Member Kelley, to adopt Resolution 2022-078. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: 1 - Council Member T. Grimsley

2. 22-260 Discussion of the Insight Market Analysis Report Prepared by HdL ECONSolutions
Recommendations: (1) Receive a presentation on the Insight Market Analysis Report, and (2) With the completion of the INSIGHT Market Analysis report package, it is recommended to proceed with the final two work products for Economic Development Services to assist with retail recruitment support with the preparation of a Community Profile and a Void Analysis to identify possible targetedusers and business type categories based on supply gap sectors.

Presentation by Director of Finance Edwin Gato and Representatives Barry Foster and Sandra Meyer of HdL. Councilmembers provided comment. No public comment. No action taken, received report only.

3. 22-261 Interim Housing Successor to the former Hercules Redevelopment Agency
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution that the City of Hercules serve as Interim Housing Successor to the former Hercules Redevelopment Agency for a limited period and purposes; designating the housing assets be administered by the City Manager or his designee(s) in order to, among other administrative actions, facilitate the collection of loan payments, execute loan subordinations, and enable borrowers to pay off loans upon sale or refinance of homes.

Presentation by Director of Finance Edwin Gato. Ann Huang of Eden Housing provided comment. Councilmembers provided comment. No public comment.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kelley, seconded by Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin, to adopt Resolution 2022-079. The motion carried by the City of Hercules Page 4
1795
City Council Meeting Minutes September 13, 2022
following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: 1 - Council Member T. Grimsley

4. 22-264 Business Grant Assistance and Business Rental Assistance ARPA Programs
Recommendation: Approve the Business Grant Assistance and the Business Rental Assistance Program components and implementation measures.

Presentation by Director of Finance Edwin Gato and Representatives Barry Foster and Sandra Meyer of HdL. Councilmembers provided comment. No public comment.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kelley, seconded by Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin, to adopt Resolution 2022-080. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: 1 - Council Member T. Grimsley

5. 22-271 Agreement with MIG in the amount of $190,845 to complete a Parks Master Plan and the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) assessment for park facilities
Recommendation: 1. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with MIG for a not to exceed amount of $190,845 to complete a Parks Master Plan and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Assessment for Park Facilities; and 2. Approve an appropriation of $15,845 in General Fund monies to fully fund the America with Disabilities Act (ADA) assessment for Park Facilities.

Presentation by City Manager Dante Hall, Cindy Mendoza of MIG. Myrna Ortiz and Noe Noyola of MIG provided comment. Councilmembers provided comment. No public comment.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kelley, seconded by Council Member Romero, to adopt Resolution 2022-081. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: 1 - Council Member T. Grimsley
XIV. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
None.

City of Hercules Page 5
1796
City Council Meeting Minutes September 13, 2022
This time is reserved for members of the public who were unavailable to attend the Public Communications period during Section X of the meeting, or were unable to speak due to lack of time. The public speaker requirements specified in Section X of this Agenda apply to this Section.

XV. CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENTS,

COMMITTEE, SUB-COMMITTEE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE REPORTS

AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Director of Parks and Recreation Christopher Roke provided an update on recent events. Mr. Roke also announced upcoming recreation events and recognized Unity Day on October 19th.

Councilmembers reported out on local and regional meetings and events.

No future agenda items requested.

XVI. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Bailey adjourned the meeting at 8:36 p.m.
_________________________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
Lauren Berges, CMC
City Clerk
City of Hercules Page 6
1797

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of September 27, 2022
TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY REVIEW OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
RECOMMENDATION:

Review, comment and receive the quarterly review of future City Council agenda items.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this report.

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this item is to identify issues presently known to staff or which members of the City Council wish to place on an upcoming City Council agenda. Council comment on these future agenda items is limited by the Brown Act to clarifying questions, brief announcements, or requests for additional information in connection with an item when it is discussed.

ATTACHMENT: Future Agenda Items List
1798
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
9/27/2022 Housing Successor Agency Gato X
Short-Term Rentals Rood X
Quarterly Review of Future Agenda Items Hall X
Parks Master Plan Steering Committee Hall/Roke X
Hispanic Heritage Month Proclamation X
Closed Session - City Attorney Eval
Closed Session - City Manager Eval
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
10/11/2022 Conflict of Interest Code - Amend and Update Berges X Proclamation for Chief Imboden Hall X
Emergency Declaration Berges X
Acceptance of Baywood Tree Replacement Project Roberts X America's Tire Store Final Map Roberts X
Swingset for Children with Disabilities Roke/Roberts X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
10/25/2022 Conservation Easement Agreement with John Muir Land Trust Roberts X SB 1383 MOU Roberts X
Sister City Discussion Berges X
Introduction of New Chief of Police Hall X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
11/8/2022 1st Qtr Revenue & Expenditure Report
Quarterly Investment Report
2023 Meeting Calendar Approval Berges X
*Special Meeting for Commission and Committee Interviews (6 pm Start)
Commission and Committee Appointments (Interview to take place during special meeting)
CC County Library Seat Roke X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
1799
12/13/2022 Confirming Election Results (even numbered years) X Reorganization of Council X
Maddy Act X
AB 1600 Report X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
1/10/2023 Regional Appointments X
Union Pacific Railroad Encroachment Permit (for lower sewer trunk replacement project) Roberts X
Aventine Parking Discussion Hall X
Review of Council Policies - Ethics, Nepotism, etc. X
Scheduled Meeting Date -
Shirtsleeves Study Session Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent Discussion Only Discussion/A
ction
1/17/2023 Sustainability Initiatives Rood X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
1/24/2023 Youth Commission Discussion Hall X
Senior Health Day Hall X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
2/14/2023 Mid-Year Budget Review
Proclamation - Police Officer of the Year
Quarterly Investment Report X
5 year Budget Forecast Updte X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
2/28/2023
1800
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
3/14/2023 Annual Housing Report X
League Financial Diagnostic Tool
Strategic Plan Review X
Master Fee Schedule - Council Review (Finance Commission and CLSC to review first) X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
3/28/2023 Preferred Parking District Victoria By the Bay Discussion Roberts X Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
4/11/2023 Annual Stormwater Parcel Assessment X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
4/25/2023
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
5/9/2023 Calling November Election (even numbered years) X Quarterly Investment Report X
Quarterly Review of Future Agenda Items X
Public Hearing - CCTA GMP Checklist (even numbered years) X AB 481 Military Equipment
1801
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
5/23/2023
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
6/13/2023 Budget Adoption and authorizing annual Contracts X Annual renewals of LLADS X
Annual Fiber Optic Broadband per Resolution 16-084 X
Scheduled Meeting Date Item Staff Responsible Presentation Public Hearing Consent
Discussion
Only
Discussion/A
ction
6/27/2023
1802
1 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of September 27, 2022
TO: Members of the City Council
VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Tim Rood, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Discussion of Potential Short-Term Rental Ordinance RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Provide direction to staff regarding the development of an ordinance and proceduresfor the regulation of short-term rentals (STRs).

COMMISSION/SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:

No Commission or Subcommittee actions or recommendations are yet applicable for this action. If an ordinance were to be considered, it would require Planning Commission review.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

If the Council desires that an ordinance be drafted, additional but unknown staff and attorney time will be needed to conduct public outreach, draft the ordinance, notify the public, and hold required public hearings. If an ordinance regulating short-term rentals were to be adopted, additional but unknown staff and vendor resources would be needed to conduct enforcement and permitting.

BACKGROUND:

At the July 26, 2022, City Council meeting, the Council requested a discussion of short-term rental regulations. The Council referred to the existing Voluntary Collection Agreement between the City and Airbnb regarding collection of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for short-term rentals in Hercules, which was authorized by Council on October 22, 2019. Since the City’s agreement with Airbnb went into effect in late 2019, the City has received $16,408.34 in TOT from Airbnb.

The City does not currently have any regulations addressing the rental of residential properties for a period of less than 30 calendar days (short-term rentals) as a land use separate and distinct from a residential land use. However, residents who rent out part or all of their property on a listing platform such as Airbnb are required to obtain a City business license. 1803
2 As of July 2022, there appeared to be 14 Airbnb listings in the City of Hercules, listed as follows:
9 - “private room”
1 – “entire rental unit”
3 – “entire guesthouse”
1 – “entire guest suite”
The addresses of Airbnb listings are proprietary to Airbnb and are not revealed to guests until a booking is confirmed.

Airbnb requirements do not require hosts to be present on site for any type of rental, whether of an entire property or a room within a property. Many hosts provide guest entry using keypads, combination locks, or lockboxes and communicate with guests as required through the hosting platform, texting, or email.

There are several other short-term rental platforms, including Booking.com, Vrbo, Expedia, and Vacasa. As of July 2022, none of these other services appeared to have any current listings in the City of Hercules.

LARGE GATHERINGS:

At the July 26, 2022, City Council meeting, a member of the Council referenced disruptive parties held at an Airbnb listing in the past. Hercules Police Department records indicate that large, disruptive parties were held on July 28, 2017, and September 23, 2017 at a house on the 400 block of Violet that had been rented through Airbnb. Both parties were shut down by the Hercules Police Department due to extreme noise levels, numerous complaint calls, and general overcrowding.

As of August 20, 2020, Airbnb’s policies prohibit gatherings of more than 16 people and all disruptive parties and events. Guests who are reported for throwing a disruptive party or violating Airbnb’s rules on gatherings of more than 16 people are subject to suspension or removal from Airbnb’s platform.

In August 2020, Airbnb also announced new anti-party technology intended to reduce the ability of bad actors to throw unauthorized parties which negatively impact hosts, neighbors, and the communities Airbnb serves. For example, this system looks at factors like history of positive reviews (or lack of positive reviews), length of time the guest has been on Airbnb, length of the trip, distance to the listing, weekend vs. weekday, among many others. This anti-party technology is designed to prevent a reservation attempt from going through. Guests who are unable to make entire home bookings due to this system will still be able to book a private room (where the host is more likely to be physically on site) or a hotel room through Airbnb.

POLICY CONSIDERATIONS:

If the Council were to give direction to develop a short-term rental ordinance, many policy questions would need to be considered as part of the public outreach effort, potentially including the following:
 Restrictions on “entire home” STRs versus “private room” STRs  Restrictions on number of “private room” listings allowed on a property 1804
3  Restrictions on length of stay
 Restrictions on total number of days rented
 Restrictions on gatherings
 Disclosure requirements for hosting platforms
 Treatment of ADUs
 Effect of a STR ordinance on the City’s Housing Element compliance  Taxes and fees for STRs
 Fines/penalties and collection processes
 Enforcement processes and staff resources
Given the many potential directions an ordinance could be taken, staff requests that the Council confirm whether an ordinance is desired, and if so, discuss the purposes of the proposed regulations to provide context for how the above policy considerations should be addressed.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Voluntary Collection Agreement with Airbnb for the collection of TOT 1805

VOLUNTARY COLLECTION AGREEMENT
FOR

CITY OF HERCULES, CALIFORNIA TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
THIS VOLUNTARY COLLECTION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is dated October 22, 2019 and is between AIRBNB, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Airbnb”), and theCITY OF HERCULES, CALIFORNIA (the “Taxing Jurisdiction”). Each party may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” RECITALS:

WHEREAS, Airbnb represents that it provides an Internet-based platform (the “Platform”) through which third parties offering accommodations and/or activities (“Hosts”)and third parties booking such accommodations and/or activities (“Guests”) may communicate, negotiate and consummate a direct booking transaction for accommodations and/or activities to which Airbnb is not a party (“Booking Transactions”); and WHEREAS, the Taxing Jurisdiction and Airbnb enter into this Agreement voluntarily in order to facilitate the reporting, collection and remittance of applicable transient occupancy taxesand applicable sales taxes (“Taxes”) imposed under applicable City of Hercules law (the applicable “Code”), on behalf of certain Hosts for Booking Transactions completed by suchHosts and Guests on the Platform for accommodations transactions located in the City of Hercules, California (the “Taxable Booking Transactions”).

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS, PROMISES AND AGREEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
(A) Solely pursuant to the tern’s and conditions of this Agreement, including only for periods in which this Agreement is effective (defined below), and solely for Taxable Booking Transactions completed on the Platform by Hosts other than those defined in Paragraphs (E) and (El) below, Airbnb agrees contractually to assume the duties of a Taxes collector as describedin the Code solely for the collection and remittance of Taxes on behalf of such Hosts (hereinafierreferred to as a “Collector”). v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1806
(B) Starting on December 1,2019 (the “Effective Date”), Airbnb agrees to commence collecting and remitting Taxes on behalf of certain Hosts, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, at the applicable rate, on Taxable Booking Transactions. Except as set forth in Paragraph (L) below, Airbnb shall not assume any obligation or liability to collect Taxes for any period or for any transaction prior to the Effective Date or after termination of this Agreement. (C) Except as set forth in Paragraph (E) below, Airbnb agrees to register as a Collector on behalf of Hosts for the sole purpose of reporting. collection and remittance of Taxes under this Agreement, and will be the registered Collector on behalf of any affiliate or subsidiary collectingTaxes. The assumption of such duties described in Paragraph (A) above and this Paragraph (C) shall not trigger any other registration requirements to which Airbnb is not otherwise subject.

REMITTANCE OF TAXES
(D) Airbnb agrees reasonably to report aggregate information on the tax return form prescribed by the Taxing Jurisdiction, including an aggregate of gross receipts, exemptions andadjustments, and taxable receipts of all Taxes that are subject to the provisions ofthisAgreement. Airbnb shall remit all Taxes collected from Guests in accordance with this Agreement and Airbnb’s Terms of Service (www.airbnb.com) (the “TOS”) in the time and manner described in the Code or as otherwise agreed to in writing.

REGISTERED HOSTS
(E) Airbnb reserves the right to implement a software feature on the Platform whereby Airbnb collects Taxes based on tax information supplied by the Host, and reinits such Taxes toHosts for ultimate reporting and remittance by the Host to the Taxing Jurisdiction. In such cases,a Host must provide to Airbnb its (i) applicable Tax identification or registration number; (ii)applicable business identification numberz and (iii) acknowledgement of its obligation to collect all Taxes owed on a Host’s Taxable Booking Transactions and to remit and report any Taxescollected directly to the Taxing Jurisdiction (a “Registered Host”). Upon request from the Taxing Jurisdiction, and not more than once per consecutive twelve-month period, Airbnb mayprovide the Taxing Jurisdiction with copies of documentation related to Registered Hosts. (E-l) Airbnb satisfies its obligations under this Agreement by remitting the hill amount of Taxes collected on behalf of Hosts to the Taxing Jurisdiction, and in the case of Registered 2 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1807
Hosts only, by remitting the Taxes collected on a Registered Host’s Taxable Booking Transactions directly to the Registered Host.

AIRBNB LIABILITY
(F) Pursuant to the tern-is of this Agreement, Airbnb agrees contractually to assume liability for any failure to report, collect and/or remit the correct amount of Taxes, including, butnot limited to, penalties and interest, lawfully and properly imposed in compliance with the Code. Nothing contained herein nor any action taken pursuant to this Agreement shall impair, restrict or prevent Airbnb from asserting that any Taxes and/or penalties, interest, fines or other amounts assessed against it were not due or are the subject of a claim for refund under applicablelaw, or otherwise bar it from enforcing any rights accorded by law. Notwithstanding the above and solely with respect to Registered Hosts, Airbnb does not assume any liability for the failure of a Registered Host to comply with any applicable collection, reporting or remittance obligations related to Taxable Booking Transactions. Further, Airbnb does not assume any liability for collection based on information supplied by the Registered Host.

AUDIT
(G) During any period for which Airbnb is not in breach of its obligations under this Agreement, the Taxing Jurisdiction agrees to audit Airbnb on the basis of Tax returns filed and supporting documentation. The Taxing Jurisdiction reserves the right to audit any individualHost for activity that has been brought to the attention ofthe Taxing Jurisdiction in the form of acomplaint or other means independent ofthis Agreement or independent of data or information provided pursuant to this Agreement.
(H) The Taxing Jurisdiction agrees to audit Airbnb on an anonymized transaction basis for Taxable Booking Transactions. Except as otherwise agreed herein, Airbnb shall not be required to produce any personally identifiable information relating to any Host or Guest orrelating to any Taxable Booking Transaction without binding legal process served only after completion of an audit by the Taxing Jurisdiction of Airbnb with respect to such users. Theparties agree to utilize appropriate sampling audit methodologies based on a standard sampleperiod which may be projected against the remainder of any periods open under the applicable statute of limitations, unless Airbnb elects, at its sole discretion, to undergo further audit of suchopen periods by the Taxing Jurisdiction. 3 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1808

GUEST AND HOST LIABILITY
(I) During any period in which this Agreement is effective, and provided Airbnb is in compliance with its obligations herein, Hosts shall be relieved of any obligation to collect and remit Taxes on Taxable Booking Transactions, and shall be permitted but not required to register individually with the Taxing Jurisdiction to collect, remit and/or report Taxes. Notwithstanding the above, Registered Hosts will be solely responsible for directly remitting Taxes collected on Taxable Booking Transactions to the Taxing Jurisdiction. Nothing in this Agreement shallrelieve Guests or Hosts from any responsibilities with respect to Taxes for transactions completed other than on the Platform, or restrict the Taxing Jurisdiction from investigating orenforcing any provision of applicable law against such users for such transactions.

WAIVER OF LOOK-BACK
(J) The Taxing Jurisdiction expressly releases, acquits, waives and forever discharges Airbnb, its current or past affiliated parent or subsidiary companies, directors, shareholders,investors, employees and other agents from any and all actions, causes of action, indebtedness, suits, damages or claims arising out of or relating to payment of and/or collection of Taxes orother tax indebtedness, including but not limited to penalties, fines, interest or other payments relating to Taxes on any Taxable Booking Transactions prior to the Effective Date. Nothing contained in this Paragraph of this Agreement will constitute a release or waiver of any claim,cause of action or indebtedness that the Taxing Jurisdiction may have or claim to have against any Host or Guest unrelated to Taxable Booking Transactions under this Agreement.

NOTIFICATION TO GUESTS AND HOSTS
(K) Airbnb agrees, for the purposes of facilitating this Agreement, and as required by its TOS, that, except with respect to Registered Hosts, it will notify (i) Hosts that Taxes will be collected and remitted to the Taxing Jurisdiction as of the Effective Date pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; and (ii) Guests and Hosts of the amount of Taxes collected and remitted on eachTaxable Booking Transaction.

LIMITATION OF APPLICATION
(L) This Agreement is solely for the purpose of facilitating the administration and collection of the Taxes with respect to Taxable Booking Transactions and, except with respect tothe rights and liabilities set forth herein, the execution of or actions taken under this Agreement 4 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1809
shall not be considered an admission of law or fact or constitute evidence thereof under the Code or any other provisions of the laws of the United States of America or of any State or subdivisionor municipality thereof Neither Party waives, and each Party expressly preserves, any and all arguments, contentions, claims, causes of action, defenses or assertions relating to the validity orinterpretation or applicability of the Code, regulations or application oflaw. (L-l) If Airbnb expands the types of transactions that may be completed by Hosts and Guests on the Platform to include additional taxable services or products located in the City ofHercules, and Airbnb decides in its sole discretion to collect and remit any applicable taxes withrespect to such transactions on behalf of Hosts and/or Guests, Airbnb agrees to provide reasonable notice to the Taxing Jurisdiction regarding the collection and remittance of such taxes.

DURATION/TERMINATION
(M) This Agreement may be terminated by Airbnb or the Taxing Jurisdiction for convenience on 30-day written notification to the other Party. Such termination will be effective on the first day of the calendar month following the 30-day written notification to the otherParty. Any termination under this Paragraph shall not affect the duty of Airbnb to remit to theTaxing Jurisdiction any Taxes collected from Guests up through and including the effective dateof termination of this Agreement, even if not remitted by Airbnb to the Taxing Jurisdiction as ofthe effective date of termination.

MISCELLANEOUS
(N) CHOICE OF LAW. This Agreement, its construction and any and all disputes arising out of or relating to it, shall be interpreted in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of California without regard to its conflict of law principles. (0) MODIFICATION. No modification, amendment, or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both Parties. (P) MERGER AND INTEGRATION. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all priornegotiations, agreements and understandings with respect thereto. (Q) COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, 5 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1810
shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Agreement shall become effective when a counterpart has been signed by each Party and delivered to the other Party, in its original form or by electronic mail, facsimile or other electronic means. The Parties hereby consent to the use of electronic signatures in connection with the execution ofthis Agreement, and flwther agree that electronic signatures to this Agreement shall be legally binding with the same force and effect as manually executed signatures.
(R) RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. The Parties are entering into an arm’s-length transaction and do not have any relationship, employment or otherwise. This Agreement doesnot create nor is it intended to create a partnership, franchise, joint venture, agency, or employment relationship between the Parties. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement.
(S) WAIVER AND CUMULATIVE REMEDIES. No failure or delay by either Party in exercising any right under this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of that right or any otherright. Other than as expressly stated herein, the remedies provided herein are in addition to, and not exclusive of, any other remedies of a Party at law or in equity. (T) FORCE MAJEURE. Neither Party shall be liable for any failure or delay in performance under this Agreement for causes beyond that Party’s reasonable control and occurring without that Party’s fault or negligence, including, but not limited to, acts of God, acts of government, flood, fire, civil unrest, acts of tenor, strikes or other labor problems (other thanthose involving Airbnb employees), computer attacks or malicious acts, such as attacks on or tlwough the Internet, any Internet service provider, telecommunications or hosting facility. Dates by which performance obligations are scheduled to be met will be extended for a period of time equal to the time lost due to any delay so caused.
(U) ASSIGNMENT. Neither Party may assign any of its rights or obligations hereunder, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the other Party (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Airbnb mayassign this Agreement in its entirety without consent of the other Party in connection with a merger, acquisition, corporate reorganization. or sale of all or substantially all of its assets. (\1) MISCELLANEOUS. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, the provision shall be modified by the court and 6 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1811
interpreted so as best to accomplish the objectives of the original provision to the fullest extent permitted bylaw, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect.

NOTICES
(W) All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given upon: (i) personal delivery; (ii) the third business day after first class mailing postage prepaid; or (iii) the second business day after sending by overnight mail or by facsimile withtelephonic confirmation of receipt. Notices shall be addressed to the attention ofthe following persons, provided each Party may modify the authorized recipients by providing written notice to the other Party:

To Airbnb:

Airbnb, Inc. Airbnb, Inc.

Attn: General Counsel Attn: Global Head of Tax
888 Brannan Street, 4th Fl. 888 Brannan Street, 4th Fl.SF,CA94103 SF.CA94103 Iega14airhnb.corn taxQvairbnb.com
To the Taxing Jurisdictiori:

City of HerculesAttn: Finance Director
Ill Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547
egatothci.hercules.ca.us
(Signatures follow on next page)
7 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1812
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Airbnb and the Taxing Jurisdiction have executed this Agreement effective on the date set forth in the introductory clause.

AIRBNB, INC., a Delaware corporation
By: ______________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative Mirei Yasumatsu. Global Tax DirectorName and Title of Authorized Representative

CITY OF HERCULES, CALIFORNIA
By: ____________________________ Signature
‘o/ 3//c3’
bavid iggs, City Manager
8 v.1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1813

VOLUNTARY COLLECTION AGREEMENT
FOR

CITY OF HERCULES, CALIFORNIA TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
THIS VOLUNTARY COLLECTION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is dated October 22, 2019 and is between AIRBNB, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Airbnb”), and theCITY OF HERCULES, CALIFORNIA (the “Taxing Jurisdiction”). Each party may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” RECITALS:

WHEREAS, Airbnb represents that it provides an Internet-based platform (the “Platform”) through which third parties offering accommodations and/or activities (“Hosts”) and third parties booking such accommodations andlor activities (“Guests”) may communicate, negotiate and consummate a direct booking transaction for accommodations and/or activities to which Airbnb is not a party (“Booking Transactions”); and WHEREAS, the Taxing Jurisdiction and Airbnb enter into this Agreement voluntarily in order to facilitate the reporting, collection and remittance of applicable transient occupancy taxes and applicable sales taxes (“Taxes”) imposed under applicable City of Hercules law (theapplicable “Code”), on behalf of certain Hosts for Booking Transactions completed by such Hosts and Guests on the Platform for accommodations transactions located in the City ofHercules, California (the “Taxable Booking Transactions”).

NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS, PROMISES AND AGREEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
(A) Solely pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including only for periods in which this Agreement is effective (defined below), and solely for Taxable BookingTransactions completed on the Platform by Hosts other than those defined in Paragraphs (E) and (E- 1) below, Airbnb agrees contractually to assume the duties of a Taxes collector as described in the Code solely for the collection and remittance of Taxes on behalf of such Hosts (hereinafterreferred to as a “Collector”). v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1814
(B) Starting on December 1,2019 (the “Effective Date”), Airbnb agrees to commence collecting and remitting Taxes on behalf of certain Hosts, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, at the applicable rate, on Taxable Booking Transactions. Except as set forth inParagraph (L) below, Airbnb shall not assume any obligation or liability to collect Taxes for anyperiod or for any transaction prior to the Effective Date or after termination of this Agreement. (C) Except as set forth in Paragraph (E) below, Airbnb agrees to register as a Collector on behalf of Hosts for the sole purpose of reporting, collection and remittance of Taxes under this Agreement, and will be the registered Collector on behalf of any affiliate or subsidiary collectingTaxes. The assumption of such duties described in Paragraph (A) above and this Paragraph (C) shall not trigger any other registration requirements to which Airbnb is not otherwise subject.

REMITTANCE OF TAXES
(D) Airbnb agrees reasonably to report aggregate information on the tax return form prescribed by the Taxing Jurisdiction, including an aggregate of gross receipts, exemptions and adjustments, and taxable receipts of all Taxes that are subject to the provisions of thisAgreement. Airbnb shall remit all Taxes collected from Guests in accordance with thisAgreement and Airbnb’s Terms of Service (www.airbnb.com) (the “TOS”) in the time and manner described in the Code or as otherwise agreed to in writing.

REGISTERED HOSTS
(E) Airbnb reserves the right to implement a software feature on the Platform whereby Airbnb collects Taxes based on tax information supplied by the Host, and remits such Taxes toHosts for ultimate reporting and remittance by the Host to the Taxing Jurisdiction. In such cases, a Host must provide to Airbnb its (i) applicable Tax identification or registration number; (ii)applicable business identification number; and (iii) acknowledgement of its obligation to collectall Taxes owed on a Host’s Taxable Booking Transactions and to remit and report any Taxescollected directly to the Taxing Jurisdiction (a “Registered Host”). Upon request from the Taxing Jurisdiction, and not more than once per consecutive twelve-month period, Airbnb mayprovide the Taxing Jurisdiction with copies of documentation related to Registered Hosts. (E-l) Airbnb satisfies its obligations under this Agreement by remitting the full amount of Taxes collected on behalf of Hosts to the Taxing Jurisdiction, and in the case of Registered 2 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1815
Hosts only, by remitting the Taxes collected on a Registered Host’s Taxable Booking Transactions directly to the Registered Host.

AIRBNB LIABILITY
(F) Pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, Airbnb agrees contractually to assume liability for any failure to report, collect andlor remit the correct amount of Taxes, including, but not limited to, penalties and interest, lawfully and properly imposed in compliance with the Code. Nothing contained herein nor any action taken pursuant to this Agreement shall impair, restrict or prevent Airbnb from asserting that any Taxes and/or penalties, interest, fines or other amounts assessed against it were not due or are the subject of a claim for refund under applicablelaw, or otherwise bar it from enforcing any rights accorded by law. Notwithstanding the above and solely with respect to Registered Hosts, Airbnb does not assume any liability for the failure of a Registered Host to comply with any applicable collection, reporting or remittance obligations related to Taxable Booking Transactions. Further, Airbnb does not assume any liability for collection based on information supplied by the Registered Host.

AUDIT
(G) During any period for which Airbnb is not in breach of its obligations under this Agreement, the Taxing Jurisdiction agrees to audit Airbnb on the basis of Tax returns filed and supporting documentation. The Taxing Jurisdiction reserves the right to audit any individual Host for activity that has been brought to the attention ofthe Taxing Jurisdiction in the form of a complaint or other means independent of this Agreement or independent of data or information provided pursuant to this Agreement.
(H) The Taxing Jurisdiction agrees to audit Airbnb on an anonymized transaction basis for Taxable Booking Transactions. Except as otherwise agreed herein, Airbnb shall not be required to produce any personally identifiable information relating to any Host or Guest orrelating to any Taxable Booking Transaction without binding legal process served only after completion of an audit by the Taxing Jurisdiction of Airbnb with respect to such users. The parties agree to utilize appropriate sampling audit methodologies based on a standard sample period which may be projected against the remainder of any periods open under the applicable statute of limitations, unless Airbnb elects, at its sole discretion, to undergo further audit of such open periods by the Taxing Jurisdiction.
3 v.1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1816

GUEST AND HOST LIABILITY
(I) During any period in which this Agreement is effective, and provided Airbnb is in compliance with its obligations herein, Hosts shall be relieved of any obligation to collect and remit Taxes on Taxable Booking Transactions, and shall be permitted but not required to register individually with the Taxing Jurisdiction to collect, remit and/or report Taxes. Notwithstandingthe above, Registered Hosts will be solely responsible for directly remitting Taxes collected onTaxable Booking Transactions to the Taxing Jurisdiction. Nothing in this Agreement shallrelieve Guests or Hosts from any responsibilities with respect to Taxes for transactions completed other than on the Platform, or restrict the Taxing Jurisdiction from investigating orenforcing any provision of applicable law against such users for such transactions.

WAIVER OF LOOK-BACK
(J) The Taxing Jurisdiction expressly releases, acquits, waives and forever discharges Airbnb, its current or past affiliated parent or subsidiary companies, directors, shareholders,investors, employees and other agents from any and all actions, causes of action, indebtedness, suits, damages or claims arising out of or relating to payment of and/or collection of Taxes or other tax indebtedness, including but not limited to penalties, fines, interest or other payments relating to Taxes on any Taxable Booking Transactions prior to the Effective Date. Nothing contained in this Paragraph of this Agreement will constitute a release or waiver of any claim, cause of action or indebtedness that the Taxing Jurisdiction may have or claim to have against any Host or Guest unrelated to Taxable Booking Transactions under this Agreement.

NOTIFICATION TO GUESTS AND HOSTS
(K) Airbnb agrees, for the purposes of facilitating this Agreement, and as required by its TOS, that, except with respect to Registered Hosts, it will notify (i) Hosts that Taxes will be collected and remitted to the Taxing Jurisdiction as ofthe Effective Date pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; and (ii) Guests and Hosts of the amount of Taxes collected and remitted on eachTaxable Booking Transaction.

LIMITATION OF APPLICATION
(L) This Agreement is solely for the purpose of facilitating the administration and collection of the Taxes with respect to Taxable Booking Transactions and, except with respect to the rights and liabilities set forth herein, the execution of or actions taken under this Agreement 4 v.1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1817
shall not be considered an admission of law or fact or constitute evidence thereof under the Code or any other provisions of the laws ofthe United States of America or of any State or subdivisionor municipality thereof Neither Party waives, and each Party expressly preserves, any and allarguments, contentions, claims, causes of action, defenses or assertions relating to the validity orinterpretation or applicability ofthe Code, regulations or application oflaw. (L-1) If Airbnb expands the types of transactions that may be completed by Hosts and Guests on the Platform to include additional taxable services or products located in the City ofHercules, and Airbnb decides in its sole discretion to collect and remit any applicable taxes withrespect to such transactions on behalf of Hosts and/or Guests, Airbnb agrees to provide reasonable notice to the Taxing Jurisdiction regarding the collection and remittance of such taxes.

DURATION/TERMINATION
(M) This Agreement may be terminated by Airbnb or the Taxing Jurisdiction for convenience on 30-day written notification to the other Party. Such termination will be effectiveon the first day of the calendar month following the 30-day written notification to the otherParty. Any termination under this Paragraph shall not affect the duty of Airbnb to remit to the Taxing Jurisdiction any Taxes collected from Guests up through and including the effective date of termination ofthis Agreement, even if not remitted by Airbnb to the Taxing Jurisdiction as ofthe effective date of termination.

MISCELLANEOUS
(N) CHOICE OF LAW. This Agreement, its construction and any and all disputes arising out of or relating to it, shall be interpreted in accordance with the substantive laws of theState of California without regard to its conflict of law principles. (0) MODIFICATION. No modification, amendment, or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both Parties. (P) MERGER AND INTEGRATION. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject mailer ofthis Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements and understandings with respect thereto. (Q) COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, 5 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1818
shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Agreement shall become effective when a counterpart has been signed by each Party and delivered to the other Party, in its original form or by electronic mail, facsimile or other electronic means. The Parties hereby consent to the use of electronic signatures in connection with the execution of this Agreement, and further agree that electronic signatures to this Agreement shall be legally binding with the same force and effect asmanually executed signatures. (R) RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. The Parties are entering into an arm’s-length transaction and do not have any relationship, employment or otherwise. This Agreement does not create nor is it intended to create a partnership, franchise, joint venture, agency, or employment relationship between the Parties. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement.
(S) WAIVER AND CUMULATIVE REMEDIES. No failure or delay by either Party in exercising any right under this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of that right or any other right. Other than as expressly stated herein, the remedies provided herein are in addition to, and not exclusive of, any other remedies of a Party at law or in equity. (T) FORCE MAJEURE. Neither Party shall be liable for any failure or delay in performance under this Agreement for causes beyond that Party’s reasonable control and occurring without that Party’s fault or negligence, including, but not limited to, acts of God, actsof government, flood, fire, civil unrest, acts of terror, strikes or other labor problems (other than those involving Airbnb employees), computer attacks or malicious acts, such as attacks on ortlrough the Internet, any Internet service provider, telecommunications or hosting facility. Dates by which perfomiance obligations are scheduled to be met will be extended for a period of time equal to the lime lost due to any delay so caused.
(U) ASSIGNMENT. Neither Party may assign any of its rights or obligations hereunder, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the other Party(which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Airbnb mayassign this Agreement in its entirety without consent of the other Party in connection with a merger, acquisition, corporate reorganization, or sale of all or substantially all ofits assets. (V) MISCELLANEOUS. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, the provision shall be modified by the court and 6 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1819
interpreted so as best to accomplish the objectives of the original provision to the fullest extent permitted by law, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect.

NOTICES
(W) All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given upon: (i) personal delivery; (ii) the third business day after first class mailing postage prepaid; or (iii) the second business day after sending by overnight mail or by facsimile with telephonic confirmation of receipt. Notices shall be addressed to the attention ofthe followingpersons, provided each Party may modify the authorized recipients by providing written notice to the other Party:

To Airbnb:

Airbnb, Inc. Airbnb, Inc.

Attn: General Counsel Attn: Global Head of Tax
888 Brannan Street, 4th Fl. 888 Brannan Street, 4th Fl.SF, CA 94103 SF, CA 94103 legal(4airbnb.com tax(äairbnb.com
To the Taxing Jurisdictiori:

City of Hercules
Attn: Finance Director
111 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547
caloQici .hercules.ua. us
(Signatures follow on next page)
7 v.1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1820
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Airbnb and the Taxing Jurisdiction have executed this Agreement effective on the date set forth in the introductory clause.

AJRBNB, INC., a Delaware corporation
By: ____________________________ Signature of Authorized Representative Mirei Yasumatsu, Global Tax Director
Name and Title of Authorized Representative

CITY OF HERCULES, CALIFORNIA
By: ______________________ Signature
‘0/2 3//
L5avid iggs, City Manager
8 v. 1.2019
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5FED9C88-E1B1-4383-B128-B3C056CD284C 1821

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of September 27, 2022
TO: Members of the City Council
VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Edwin Gato, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Authorization to Negotiate an Agreement with the Contra Costa County Housing Authority to Transfer Hercules Housing Successor Assets and Functions to the City

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Direct staff to negotiate an agreement with the Contra Costa County Housing Authority (“Housing Authority”) to transfer Hercules Housing Successor assets and functions to the City of Hercules (“City”). If the Housing Authority agrees on the terms of a transfer, an agreement will be drafted and presented to City Council and the Housing Authority Board for consideration at a later date.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENATION
Authorization of negotiations has no immediate fiscal impact. If an agreement is negotiated, the fiscal impact will be detailed when it is presented to City Council.

BACKGROUND
The Hercules Redevelopment Agency (“Former Agency”) was dissolved on February 1, 2012, under California Dissolution Law (Health and Safety Code or “HSC” Section 33000 et seq.). The City elected to become the Successor Agency to the Hercules Redevelopment Agency (“Successor Agency”) to wind-down non-housing assets and liabilities. The City did not elect to become the Housing Successor to the Hercules Redevelopment Agency (“Housing Successor”) to retain housing assets and functions. The City declined the role of Housing Successor in 2012 because there was no funding for the management or monitoring of housing assets and functions, and because the City believed the Housing Authority would take responsibility of Former Agency housing assets.

HSC 34176(b) states if a city does not elect to become Housing Successor, that role shall be transferred to the local housing authority. The Housing Authority automatically became the Housing Successor by operation of law. However, when the City attempted to transfer Former Agency assets to the Housing Authority, the Housing Authority declined Housing Successor responsibilities. The California Department of Finance (“DOF”) wrote a letter to the Housing Authority dated September 17, 2012, explaining they do not have the legal basis for declining the role of Housing Successor (see 1822
Attachment 1, Exhibit A). Regardless, the Housing Authority has not initiated the transfer of Former Agency housing assets to date.

The Housing Authority’s refusal of Housing Successor responsibilities has left 108 loans with an outstanding balance of $3.9 million and $4.9 million in deposits from loan repayments in a state of limbo since 2012. The City does not have the legal authority to administer loans and spend money generated by Former Agency housing assets (“Housing Funds”) because the Housing Funds are restricted as Housing Successor assets under HSC 34176 and 34176.1.

City staff is requesting City Council’s authorization to initiate discussions and negotiate an agreement with the Housing Authority to legally transfer the role of Housing Successor, including all housing assets and functions of the Former Agency, from the Housing Authority to the City. This will allow the City to actively administer the $3.9 million in outstanding loans and access the $4.9 million in Housing Funds to pay for Housing Successor administrative costs and affordable housing development.

Why Now?
Ten years have passed since the dissolution of the Former Agency. The earlier years of dissolution were a rocky period. The City was in litigation with DOF over the repayment of a City loan advanced to the Former Agency to cover debt service shortfalls. The City and DOF entered into a settlement agreement in March 2020 and the City continues to make settlement payments totaling $3.6 million (final payment due May 2023). Now that these issues have been resolved, the City can allocate more resources to become the Housing Successor.

After the Housing Authority refused Housing Successor responsibilities, City staff has responded to requests on a case-by-case basis from borrowers to pay off Former Agency housing loans upon the sale or refinance of their homes. Loans have not been actively administered otherwise due to a lack of funding and legal authority to do so.

Homeowners with outstanding loans have been negatively impacted because their loans have not been actively administered by the Housing Authority. This has led to frustration among some loan holders who find that the balance is due upon the sale or refinance of their homes because the loans are secured by a lien on their property. The City would like to help homeowners by having the legal ability to actively administer loans and communicate payoff requirements.

The Housing Fund has collected $4.9 million from loan repayments since dissolution. Becoming Housing Successor would allow the City to use these fundsto cover loan and other Housing Successor administrative costs. The City could also use Housing Funds to pay for development of housing for affordable to extremely low to low-income households under HSC 34176.1. 1823
Housing Successor Assets
Former Agency housing assets include:
 108 loans receivable with an outstanding balance of $3.9 million owed to the Housing Successor
o 18 loans receivable with an outstanding balance of $2.9 million are delinquent or received a notice of default from their third-party lender.  $4.9 million in cash from loan repayments deposited into the Former Agency’s Low- and Moderate-income Housing Fund; these monies would be transferred to a new Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund set up by the City as Housing Successor (“Housing Fund”)
The Housing Asset Transfer List (see Attachment 1, Exhibit B) provides a detailed list of loans receivable.

Housing Successor Responsibilities and Costs
If the City becomes Housing Successor, it will incur costs to administer loans, prepare annual reports due to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”), and report on the Housing Fund in the City’s audited financial statements.

Administrative costs are estimated to be $200,000 to $225,000 in the first year to set up the Housing Fund, catch up on annual reports, and review outstanding loan balances and payoff status. Ongoing annual administrative costs are estimated to be $100,000 to $150,000 based on a review of other housing successors. State law permits a maximum annual administrative allowance of $200,000 per year adjusted for inflation. The limit in fiscal year 2020-21 was $223,400.

The Housing Successor may also incur costs to fund affordable housing development and homeless prevention and rapid rehousing activities described in the next section.

Housing Successor Opportunities
Housing Funds may be spent on affordable housing development for extremely low to low-income households. There are three major requirements on how the funds may be spent:
 at least 30% of Housing Funds must be spent assisting extremely low-income rental housing,  no more than 20% of Housing Funds may assist low-income households (60-80% of the Area Median Income), and
 no more than 50% of units assisted may be restricted to seniors.

Housing Successors may also spend up to $250,000 per year on homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing services, if eligible. Hercules is most likely eligible because the Former Agency met its inclusionary housing production obligations as of 2009; eligibility would be confirmed after analyzing housing activity between 2009-2012.
1824
If the City becomes Housing Successor, it should set-aside at least $500,000 to $1 million in Housing Funds for administrative costs from the $4.9 million Housing Fund balance funded by prior loan repayments. The remainder could be used assisting affordable housing. It is important to note there is no ongoing revenue source for housing successors. The only revenue source for the Hercules Housing Successor is loan repayments. If the Housing Successor assists affordable housing development, the assistance is commonly structured as a 55-year loan.

Next Steps
If City Council authorizes negotiations, City staff will request a meeting with Housing Authority staff to discuss a proposed Term Sheet (Attachment 1) that describes the housing assets and functions to be transferred. If the Housing Authority agrees, an agreement will be drafted and presented to the City Council and Housing Authority Board (County Board of Supervisors) at a later date.

If City Council does not authorize negotiations, or if the Housing Authority refuses the role of Housing Successor and declines to transfer the role to the City, City staff will return to City Council to obtain direction on next steps, including whether to request that all Former Agency housing assets be transferred to the Housing Authority. It would likely involve appealing to DOF or local legislators for assistance.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed Term Sheet
a. Exhibit A: DOF Letter to Housing Authority
b. Exhibit B: Housing Asset Transfer List
1825

TERM SHEET

FOR THE TRANSFER OF FORMER HERCULES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

HOUSING ASSETS AND FUNCTIONS

FROM THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY

TO THE CITY OF HERCULES AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR
{Date}

BACKGROUND
The former Hercules Redevelopment Agency (“Former Agency”) dissolved effective February 1, 2012, pursuant to the Dissolution Law enacted by Assembly Bill x1 26 and subsequent amendments. The City of Hercules (“City”) did not elect to serve as the Housing Successor to the Hercules Redevelopment Agency (“Housing Successor”) pursuant to Health and Safety Code (“HSC”) Section 34176.

HSC 34176(b) states if a city does not elect to retain the responsibilities for former redevelopment agency housing functions, all rights, powers, assets, duties, and obligations associated with the housing activities of the former redevelopment agency shall be transferred to the local housing authority. As a result, the Contra Costa County Housing Authority (“Housing Authority”) automatically became the Housing Successor as the local housing authority by operation of law because the City did not elect to do so.

On June 6, 2012, Joseph Villarreal, Executive Director of the Housing Authority, notified the City that it was declining Housing Successor responsibilities and assets. The California Department of Finance (“DOF”) sent a letter to the Housing Authority dated September 17, 2012, stating the Housing Authority has no legal basis for refusing to perform the duties required by HSC Section 34176(b)(2) (see Exhibit A). Zach Stacy, Manager of the Office of State Audits and Evaluations at DOF, confirmed in an e-mail dated July 6, 2022, that the Housing Successor role was transferred to the Housing Authority.

The Housing Authority has not initiated a transfer of Former Agency housing assets to date. As a result, over 100 homeowner and developer loans issued by the Former Agency have not been actively administered. The City would like to formally become the Housing Successor so it can administer such loans and assets.

PURPOSE & INTENT
The City proposes entering into an agreement with the Housing Authority to formally transfer the Hercules Housing Successor role, responsibilities, and assets from the Housing Authority to the City.
1826
Draft Term Sheet – Hercules Housing Successor Transfer
{Date}

Page 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting