1.58E-03 1.51E-03 82.8643
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas 4.50E-04 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 0 82.3748 82.3748 Unmitigated
8.32E-03 0.0711 0.0303
82.3748 82.3748 1.58E-03 1.51E-03 82.8643
5.00E-03 6.10E-04 31.2303
NaturalGas
Mitigated
8.32E-03 0.0711 0.0303 4.50E-04 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 0 Electricity 00 0 0 0 30.9245 30.9245
Unmitigated
23.6891 23.6891 3.83E-03 4.60E-04 23.9234
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity Mitigated 00 0 0 0
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
Appendix
A Page 85
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
1.51E-03 82.8643
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
5.75E-03 0 82.3748 82.3748 1.58E-03
82.3748 1.58E-03 1.51E-03 82.8643
Total 8.32E-03 0.0711 0.0303 4.50E-04 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 Single Family 0.0303 4.50E-04 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 0 82.3748 Housing
1.54E+06 8.32E-03 0.0711
000 00
00 Parking Lot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0000
0000
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
00000 00 0
City Park 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00
N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
1.51E-03 82.8643
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
5.75E-03 0 82.3748 82.3748 1.58E-03
82.3748 1.58E-03 1.51E-03 82.8643
Total 8.32E-03 0.0711 0.0303 4.50E-04 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 Single Family 0.0303 4.50E-04 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 5.75E-03 0 82.3748 Housing
1.54E+06 8.32E-03 0.0711
000 00
00 Parking Lot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt 0 0000
Surfaces
00000 00 0
Appendix
A Page 86
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Single Family 5.30E-04 27.3655
Housing
292871 27.0975 4.38E-03
0 -1.8267
Parking Lot 2262 0.2093 3.00E-05 0 0.2114
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
-19550 -1.8088 -0.0003
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
City Park -19550 -1.8088 -0.0003 0 -1.8267
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5.70E-04 29.1922
Total 30.9245 5.01E-03 6.10E-04 31.2303
Single Family
Housing
312421 28.9064 4.68E-03
00 Parking Lot 21812 2.0181 3.30E-04 4.00E-05 2.0381
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
000
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
City Park 0 0 0 0 0
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Appendix
A Page 87
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Architectural 00 0 0 000 000
Coating
0.054
CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0101 2.00E-05 4.0432
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
4.0432
Unmitigated 0.3698 6.03E-03 0.3918 3.30E-04 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017 2.0499 1.7347 3.7845
2.0499 1.7347 3.7845 0.0101 2.00E-05
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3698 6.03E-03 0.3918 3.30E-04 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 23.6891 3.83E-03 4.50E-04 23.9234
Appendix
A Page 88
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
0.0101 2.00E-05 4.0432
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total 0.3698 6.04E-03 0.3918 3.30E-04 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 2.0499 1.7347 3.7845
0.4863 0.4863 4.70E-04 0 0.498
9.61E-03 2.00E-05 3.5452
Landscaping 8.98E-03 3.43E-03 0.2975 2.00E-05 1.65E-03 1.65E-03 1.65E-03 1.65E-03 0 Hearth 0.0105 2.61E-03 0.0943 3.10E-04 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 2.0499 1.2484 3.2983 0000 0
000
Consumer
Products
0.2963 0 0 0 0 0
Architectural 00 0 0 000
Coating
0.054
CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
0.0101 2.00E-05 4.0432
Mitigated
Total 0.3698 6.04E-03 0.3918 3.30E-04 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 2.0499 1.7347 3.7845
0.4863 0.4863 4.70E-04 0 0.498
9.61E-03 2.00E-05 3.5452
Landscaping 8.98E-03 3.43E-03 0.2975 2.00E-05 1.65E-03 1.65E-03 1.65E-03 1.65E-03 0 Hearth 0.0105 2.61E-03 0.0943 3.10E-04 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 0.0154 2.0499 1.2484 3.2983 Consumer 0000 0
Products
0.2963 0 0 0 0 0
Appendix
A Page 89
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.04E-03 5.4024
Total 2.8373 0.0853 2.04E-03 5.5778
Single Family
Housing
2.60616 /
1.64301
2.6636 0.0852
00 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0 0
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
City Park 0 /
0.536167
0.1736 3.00E-05 0 0.1754
5.5777
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 2.8373 0.0853 2.04E-03
CO2e
Category t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 2.8373 0.0853 2.04E-03 5.5777
Total CO2 CH4 N2O
Appendix
A Page 90
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ton
MT/yr
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2.04E-03 5.4024
Total 2.8373 0.0853 2.04E-03 5.5778
Single Family
Housing
2.60616 /
1.64301
2.6636 0.0852
00 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0 0
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
City Park 0 /
0.536167
0.1736 3.00E-05 0 0.1754
Mitigated
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Appendix
A Page 91
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
0 24.0789
Total 9.7273 0.5749 0 24.099
Single Family
Housing
47.88 9.7192 0.5744
00 Parking Lot 0 0 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
000
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
City Park 0.04 8.12E-03 4.80E-04 0 0.0201
24.099
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 9.7273 0.5749 0
Mitigated 9.7273 0.5749 0 24.099
Appendix
A Page 92
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
0 24.0789
Total 9.7273 0.5749 0 24.099
Single Family
Housing
47.88 9.7192 0.5744
00 Parking Lot 0 0 0 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
000
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
City Park 0.04 8.12E-03 4.80E-04 0 0.0201
Appendix
A Page 93
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors - Off-road Equipment - Zeroed out construction equipmentTrips and VMT - Architectural Coating - Vehicle Trips - Zeroed out off-site tripsVehicle Emission Factors -
0.004
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Typical construction trailer for estimate of energy usageCO2 Intensity Factor adjusted to reflect SCE's GHG Emissions Factors Land Use - 12'x60' single-wide unit (720 sq ft)Construction Phase - Typical construction trailer for energy use estimates - estimates are included in the operational component of the results CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Climate Zone 5 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 58 General Office Building 0.72 1000sqft 0.02 720.00
Typical Construction Trailer
Contra Costa County, Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Appendix
A Page 94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Mitigated Construction
0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
Maximum 4.2300e003 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e-004 0.0000
1.8000e004 1.0000e- 1.8000e-004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 005 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 2023 4.2300e- 0.0000 003 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Area Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Consumer Products - Area Coating - Landscape Equipment - Appendix
A Page 95
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
0.0000 0.1360 8.0400e003 0.0000 0.3369
2.6000e004 1.9000e- 004 4.0944
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1360
3.0000e005 4.0000e- 1.2800e-003 0.0000 4.0302 4.0302 005 4.6900e-003 3.0000e- 005 4.7300e- 003 Mobile 2.2900e- 1.2500e-003 003 2.5600e- 003 0.0211
1.5379 1.5379 1.4000e004 3.0000e- 005 1.5502
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005
Energy 7.0000e005 6.8000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e-005 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 Area 3.1900e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Highest
0.00 0.00 0.00
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
Maximum 4.2300e003 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e-004 0.0000
1.8000e004 1.0000e- 1.8000e-004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 005 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 2023 4.2300e- 0.0000 003 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Appendix
A Page 96
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
0.00 0.00 0.00
3.0 Construction Detail
N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2
5.6575 5.8341 0.0126 3.2000e004 6.2460
4.1800e003 1.0000e- 004 0.2645
Total 5.5500e003 3.2400e- 003 0.0217 4.0000e- 005 4.6900e-003 8.0000e- 005 4.7800e- 003 1.2500e-003 8.0000e- 005 1.3300e-003 0.1766 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0406 0.0895 0.1301
0.0000 0.1360 8.0400e003 0.0000 0.3369
2.6000e004 1.9000e- 004 4.0944
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1360
3.0000e005 4.0000e- 1.2800e-003 0.0000 4.0302 4.0302 005 4.6900e-003 3.0000e- 005 4.7300e- 003 Mobile 2.2900e- 1.2500e-003 003 2.5600e- 003 0.0211
1.5379 1.5379 1.4000e004 3.0000e- 005 1.5502
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005
Energy 7.0000e005 6.8000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e-005 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 Area 3.1900e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
5.6575 5.8341 0.0126 3.2000e004 6.2460
4.1800e003 1.0000e- 004 0.2645
Total 5.5500e003 3.2400e- 003 0.0217 4.0000e- 005 4.6900e-003 8.0000e- 005 4.7800e- 003 1.2500e-003 8.0000e- 005 1.3300e-003 0.1766 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0406 0.0895 0.1301
Appendix
A Page 97
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
3.2 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling Vehicle
Class
Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Load Factor
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 1,080; Non-Residential Outdoor: 360; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural OffRoad Equipment
Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/2/2023 10/6/2023 5 5 Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date
Construction Phase
Appendix
A Page 98
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
1.8000e004 1.0000e- 1.8000e-004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 005 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 Total 4.2300e- 003 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003
0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.8000e004 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e-004 0.0000 Archit. Coating 3.7500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Appendix
A Page 99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
1.8000e004 1.0000e- 1.8000e-004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 005 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 Total 4.2300e- 003 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003
0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e005 0.0000 0.6393
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.8000e004 3.2600e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8000e-004 0.0000 Archit. Coating 3.7500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Appendix
A Page 100
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
0.000337 0.025847 0.001311 0.003372
5.0 Energy Detail
General Office Building 0.561700 0.056037 0.179622 0.127612 0.023848 0.005501 0.007131 0.007135 0.000546 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2
General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by 12,686
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Total 7.01 1.59 0.50 12,686
Annual VMT
General Office Building 7.01 1.59 0.50 12,686 12,686
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
2.6000e004 1.9000e- 004 4.0944
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
4.0944
Unmitigated 2.2900e003 2.5600e- 003 0.0211 4.0000e- 005 4.6900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.7300e- 003 1.2500e-003 3.0000e- 005 1.2800e-003 0.0000 4.0302 4.0302
0.0000 4.0302 4.0302 2.6000e004 1.9000e- 004
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 2.2900e003 2.5600e- 003 0.0211 4.0000e- 005 4.6900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.7300e- 003 1.2500e-003 3.0000e- 005 1.2800e-003 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total
PM10
Appendix
A Page 101
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
0.7358 1.0000e005 5.0000e- 1.0000e-005 0.7402 005 5.7000e- 5.0000e-005 0.0000 0.7358 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 General Office 5.0000e-005 Building 13788 7.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
0.7358 0.7358 1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.7402
1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.7402
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
7.0000e005 6.8000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e-005 0.0000
5.0000e005 0.0000 5.0000e- 5.0000e-005 0.0000 0.7358 0.7358 005 5.0000e- 005 NaturalGas Mitigated 7.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 5.7000e- 004
0.8021 0.8021 1.3000e004 2.0000e- 005 0.8100
1.3000e004 2.0000e- 005 0.8100
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8021 0.8021 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Appendix
A Page 102
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.0000e005 Total 0.8021 1.3000e- 0.8100 004
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
General Office
Building
8668.8 0.8021 1.3000e004 2.0000e- 005 0.8100
1.0000e-005 0.7402
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5.0000e-005 0.0000 0.7358 0.7358 1.0000e005
0.7358 1.0000e005 1.0000e-005 0.7402
Total 7.0000e005 6.8000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e-005 5.0000e- 005
5.0000e005 5.7000e- 5.0000e-005 0.0000 0.7358 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 General Office 5.0000e-005 Building 13788 7.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
1.0000e-005 0.7402
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
5.0000e-005 0.0000 0.7358 0.7358 1.0000e005 Total 7.0000e- 005 6.8000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e-005 5.0000e- 005 Appendix
A Page 103
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005
1.0000e005
Unmitigated 3.1900e003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005
0.0000 1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 3.1900e003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
2.0000e005 0.8100
6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 0.8021 1.3000e004
Land Use kWh/yr t
on
MT/yr
General Office
Building
8668.8 0.8021 1.3000e004 2.0000e- 005 0.8100
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Appendix
A Page 104
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005
Total 3.1900e003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
2.8100e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
3.8000e004
N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005
0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005
Total 3.1900e003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
2.8100e003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
3.8000e004
CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
Appendix
A Page 105
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
1.0000e004 Total 0.1301 4.1800e- 0.2645 003
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
General Office
Building
0.127968 / 0.0784322
0.1301 4.1800e003 1.0000e- 004 0.2645
0.2645
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 0.1301 4.1800e003 1.0000e- 004
Category t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1301 4.1800e003 1.0000e- 004 0.2645
7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Appendix
A Page 106
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Unmitigated 0.1360 8.0400e- 0.3369
003
0.0000
CO2e
ton
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1360 8.0400e003 0.0000 0.3369
Total CO2 CH4 N2O
1.0000e004 0.2645
8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total 0.1301 4.1800e003
Land Use Mgal t
on
MT/yr
General Office
Building
0.127968 / 0.0784322
0.1301 4.1800e003 1.0000e- 004 0.2645
Mitigated
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Appendix
A Page 107
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
0.0000 0.3369
9.0 Operational Offroad
Total 0.1360 8.0400e003
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
General Office
Building
0.67 0.1360 8.0400e003 0.0000 0.3369
0.0000 0.3369
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 0.1360 8.0400e003
Land Use tons t
on
MT/yr
General Office
Building
0.67 0.1360 8.0400e003 0.0000 0.3369
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Appendix
A Page 108
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
Typical Construction Trailer - Contra Costa County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year
Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day
Appendix
A Page 109
Construction Activity PM2.5 (Exhaust) Construction Hours 1,368 on site 0.00783
off site 0.00012 Elapsed Hours 5,746
Demolition 0.00795
on site 0.00275 Variable Factor 4.20
off site 0.00000
Site Preparation (Site‐Wide) 0.00275 On‐Site Emissions 89.76 pounds on site 0.01030 40,714.42 grams
off site 0.00001 7.086E+00 grams/hours
Grading (Site‐Wide) 0.01031 1.968E‐03 grams/sec
on site 0.00164 6.350E‐04 grams/sec
off site 0.00003
Building Construction (Model Homes) 0.00167 Off‐Site Emissions 0.92 pounds on site 0.00505 417.30 grams
off site 0.00000 7.263E‐02 grams/hour
Paving (Roadways & Model Homes) 0.00505 2.018E‐05 grams/sec on site 0.00030
off site 0.00000
Architectural Coating (Pavement & Model Homes) 0.00030 Mitigation Applied on site 0.01460 MM AIR‐1
off site 0.00029
Building Construction (Pre‐Receptors) 0.01489
on site 0.00241
off site 0.00001
Architectural Coating (Pre‐Receptors) 0.00242
Total On site 0.04488
Total Off site 0.00046
Total Construction Emissions 0.04534
Mitigation Description
BAAQMD Construction Dust Control Measures
(24 hours/day, 239 calendar days)
Project Construction DPM Emissions
(Development Before On‐Site Receptors [10/11/23 ‐ 6/5/24]) Annual Construction Emissions (tons) Exhaust PM2.5 AERMOD Inputs (8 hours/day, 171 workdays)
Appendix
A Page 110
Roadway Segment
Length
(Miles) Proportion of Total
PM2.5 (Exhaust)
Emission Rate (g/sec)
Skelly Road 0.2 100.00% 4.664E‐07
Totals 0.2 100.00% 4.664E‐07
Phase Name Days
Daily Vendor Truck
Trips Total Vendor Truck Trips Total Hauling Truck Trips Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip
Length
Demolition 82 ‐ ‐ 224 7.3 20.0
Site Preparation (Site‐Wide) 82 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.3 20.0Grading (Site‐Wide) 41 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.3 20.0Building Construction (Model Homes) 10 19 190 ‐ 7.3 20.0 Paving (Roadways & Model Homes) 45 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.3 20.0
Architectural Coating (Pavement & Model Homes) 10 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.3 20.0 Building Construction (Pre‐Receptors) 89 19 1,691 ‐ 7.3 20.0 Architectural Coating (Pre‐Receptors) 79 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.3 20.0 Totals 1,881 224
Total Vehicle Trips
Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) Total Vehicle Trips
Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT)
Vendor Trucks 1,881.00 13,731.30 Vendor Trucks 1,881.00 376.20 Hauling Trucks 224 4,480 Hauling Trucks 224 45
Total VMT 18,211 Total VMT 421.00
Proportion of off‐site emissions occuring within 1,000 of project site: 2.3118% Diesel‐Fueled Vehicle Results AERMOD 1,000‐ft Radius Adjustment Off‐Site AERMOD Input Adjustments
Notes:1 Conversion factor of 453.592 grams/pound was used to convert daily emissions expressed in pounds to daily emissions expressed in grams.
2 Off‐site emissions used in the AERMOD air dispersion model were reduced to account for the proportion of emissions occurring within 1,000 feet of the project site.
Off‐Site Emission Adjustment for 1,000‐foot Radius of Project Site Appendix
A Page 111
Construction Activity PM2.5 (Exhaust) Construction Hours 840 on site 0.01730
off site 0.00006 Elapsed Hours 3,528
Building Construction (Post‐Receptors) 0.01736
on site 0.00320 Variable Factor 4.20
off site 0.00000
Architectural Coating (Post‐Receptors) 0.00320 On‐Site Emissions 41.00 pounds Total On site 0.02050 18,597.27 grams
Total Off site 0.00006 5.271E+00 grams/hours
Total Construction Emissions 0.02056 1.464E‐03 grams/sec
4.723E‐04 grams/sec
Off‐Site Emissions 0.12 pounds
54.43 grams
1.543E‐02 grams/hour4.286E‐06 grams/sec
Mitigation Applied
MM AIR‐1
(24 hours/day, 147 calendar days)
Project Construction DPM Emissions
(Development After On‐Site Receptors [6/6/24 ‐ 10/30/24]) Annual Construction Emissions (tons) Exhaust PM2.5 AERMOD Inputs (8 hours/day, 105 workdays)
Mitigation Description
BAAQMD Construction Dust Control Measures
Appendix
A Page 112
Roadway Segment
Length
(Miles) Proportion of Total
PM2.5 (Exhaust)
Emission Rate (g/sec)
Skelly Road 0.2 100.00% 1.174E‐07Totals 0.2 100.00% 1.174E‐07 Phase Name Days
Daily Vendor Truck
Trips Total Vendor Truck Trips Total Hauling Truck Trips Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip
Length
Building Construction (Post‐Receptors) 18 19 342 ‐ 7.3 20.0 Architectural Coating (Post‐Receptors) 96 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7.3 20.0 Totals 342 ‐
Total Vehicle Trips
Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) Total Vehicle Trips
Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT)
Vendor Trucks 342.00 2,496.60 Vendor Trucks 342.00 68.40 Hauling Trucks ‐ ‐ Hauling Trucks ‐ ‐ Total VMT 2,497 Total VMT 68.40
Proportion of off‐site emissions occuring within 1,000 of project site: 2.7397% Off‐Site AERMOD Input Adjustments
Notes:1 Conversion factor of 453.592 grams/pound was used to convert daily emissions expressed in pounds to daily emissions expressed in grams.
2 Off‐site emissions used in the AERMOD air dispersion model were reduced to account for the proportion of emissions occurring within 1,000 feet of the project site.
Off‐Site Emission Adjustment for 1,000‐foot Radius of Project Site Diesel‐Fueled Vehicle Results AERMOD 1,000‐ft Radius Adjustment Appendix
A Page 113
Permitted Stationary Sources within 1,000 feet of the Project Site:
Facility ID Name Address City St Zip County Cancer (per million) Hazard PM_2.5 (ug/m3) Type Latitude Longitude 1194* Pinole‐Hercules
WastewaterTreatment Plant
11 Tennent
Avenue
Pinole CA 94564 Contra Costa 41.37 0.08 0.22 Contact
BAAQMD
38.008 ‐122.293
110796 The Pump House 700
TennentAve
Pinole CA 94564 Contra Costa 16.27 0.07 0 Gas
DispensingFacility
38.005 ‐122.291
Notes:* This facility is misrepresented on the map shown above and is instead over 2,000 feet from the project site. Therefore, this facility was not included in the cumulative health impact analysis.
Facility ID 110796 Facility ID 110796Distance to Off‐Site MIR (feet): 1,835 Distance to On‐Site MIR (feet): 1,415
Data provided by BAAQMD: Data adjusted for distance:
Cancer Risk 16.27 Cancer Risk 0.24Hazard 0 Hazard 0PM2.5 (ug/m3) 0 PM2.5 (ug/m3) 0Source Type Gas Dispensing Facility Source Type Gas Dispensing Facility Existing Stationary Sources within 1,000 Feet of the Project Lat, Long Project Site: 38.008381, ‐122.288325
Appendix
A Page 114
Skelly Road Residential Project ‐ Off‐Site Residential Cancer Risks Unmitigated Construction ‐ Cancer Risk Calculations
Residential MIR Coordinates: 562,470.86 meters easting and 4,207,142.06 meters northing.
Residential ‐ Infant (AERMOD Receptor ID: R‐18)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 3rd Trimester Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.04431 1.1 361 0.25 350 25550 1 10 0.60 95th Percentile DBR 0 to 1 Phases 2 through 5 0.04431 1.1 1090 0.25 350 25550 1 10 1.82 0 to 1 Phases 2 through 5 0.04616 1.1 1090 0.50 350 25550 1 10 3.79 Total 6.21
Residential ‐ Child (AERMOD Receptor ID: R‐18)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 3 to 4 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.04431 1.1 631 0.50 350 25550 1 3 0.63 80th Percentile DBR 3 to 4 Phases 2 through 5 0.04616 1.1 631 0.50 350 25550 1 3 0.66 Total 1.29
Residential ‐ Adult (AERMOD Receptor ID: R‐18)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 16 to 17 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.04431 1.1 261 0.50 350 25550 0.73 1 0.06 80th Percentile DBR 16 to 17 Phases 2 through 5 0.04616 1.1 261 0.50 350 25550 0.73 1 0.07 Total 0.13
Maximum Total 6.21
Skelly Road Residential Project ‐ On‐Site Residential Cancer Risks Unmitigated Construction ‐ Cancer Risk Calculations
Residential MIR Coordinates: 562,414.89 meters easting and 4,207,033.80 meters northing.
Residential ‐ Infant (AERMOD Receptor ID: OSR‐1)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 3rd Trimester Phases 2 through 5 0.06321 1.1 361 0.25 350 25550 1 10 0.86 95th Percentile DBR 0 to 1 Phases 2 through 5 0.06321 1.1 1090 0.25 350 25550 1 10 2.60 Total 3.46
Residential ‐ Child (AERMOD Receptor ID: OSR‐1)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 3 to 4 Phases 2 through 5 0.06321 1.1 631 0.50 350 25550 1 3 0.90 80th Percentile DBR Total 0.90
Residential ‐ Adult (AERMOD Receptor ID: OSR‐1)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 16 to 17 Phases 2 through 5 0.06321 1.1 261 0.50 350 25550 0.73 1 0.09 80th Percentile DBR Total 0.09
Maximum Total 3.46
Appendix A Page 115
Skelly Road Residential Project ‐ Daycare Cancer Risks (Loving Arms Family Daycare) Unmitigated Construction ‐ Cancer Risk Calculations
Daycare MIR Coordinates: 562,235.26 meters easting and 4,207,149.71 meters northing.
Daycare ‐ Infant (AERMOD Receptor ID: LAFD‐3)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 3rd Trimester Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00341 1.1 361 0.25 350 25550 1 10 0.05 95th Percentile DBR 0 to 1 Phases 2 through 5 0.00341 1.1 1090 0.25 350 25550 1 10 0.14 0 to 1 Phases 2 through 5 0.00253 1.1 1090 0.50 350 25550 1 10 0.21 Total 0.39
Daycare ‐ Child (AERMOD Receptor ID: LAFD‐3)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 3 to 4 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00341 1.1 631 0.50 350 25550 1 3 0.05 80th Percentile DBR 3 to 4 Phases 2 through 5 0.00253 1.1 631 0.50 350 25550 1 3 0.04 Total 0.08
Daycare ‐ Adult (AERMOD Receptor ID: LAFD‐3)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 16 to 17 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00341 1.1 261 0.50 350 25550 1 1 0.01 80th Percentile DBR 16 to 17 Phases 2 through 5 0.00253 1.1 261 0.50 350 25550 1 1 0.00 Total 0.01
Maximum Total 0.39
Appendix A Page 116
Skelly Road Residential Project ‐ School Cancer Risks (La Casitas Bilingual Montessori School [ages 2.5+]) Unmitigated Construction ‐ Cancer Risk Calculations
School MIR Coordinates: 562,279.18 meters easting and 4,206,860.34 meters northing.
School ‐ Infant (AERMOD Receptor ID: LCBMS‐5)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 2 to 3 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00109 1.1 1090 0.50 250 25550 1 10 0.06 95th Percentile DBR 3 to 4 Phases 2 through 5 0.00103 1.1 1090 0.50 250 25550 1 10 0.06 Total 0.12
School ‐ Child (AERMOD Receptor ID: LCBMS‐5)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 3 to 4 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00109 1.1 861 0.50 250 25550 1 3 0.02 95th Percentile DBR 3 to 4 Phases 2 through 5 0.00103 1.1 861 0.50 250 25550 1 3 0.01 Total 0.03
School ‐ Adult (AERMOD Receptor ID: LCBMS‐5)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 16 to 17 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00109 1.1 335 0.50 250 25550 1 1 0.00 95th Percentile DBR 16 to 17 Phases 2 through 5 0.00103 1.1 335 0.50 250 25550 1 1 0.00 Total 0.00
Maximum Total 0.12
Appendix
A Page 117
Skelly Road Residential Project ‐ Community Center Cancer Risks (Pinole Community Players [ages 6+]) Unmitigated Construction ‐ Cancer Risk Calculations
Community Center MIR Coordinates: 562,320.28 meters easting and 4,206,816.04 meters northing.
Community Center ‐ Child (AERMOD Receptor ID: PCP‐49)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 6 to 7 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00130 1.1 861 0.50 350 25550 1 3 0.03 95th Percentile DBR 6 to 7 Phases 2 through 5 0.00126 1.1 861 0.50 350 25550 1 3 0.02 Total 0.05
Community Center ‐ Adult (AERMOD Receptor ID: PCP‐49)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 16 to 17 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00130 1.1 335 0.50 350 25550 1 1 0.00 95th Percentile DBR 16 to 17 Phases 2 through 5 0.00126 1.1 335 0.50 350 25550 1 1 0.00 Total 0.01
Maximum Total 0.05
Skelly Road Residential Project ‐ Community Center Cancer Risks (Pinole Senior Center [ages 55+]) Unmitigated Construction ‐ Cancer Risk Calculations
Community Center MIR Coordinates: 562,330.42 meters easting and 4,206,909.56 meters northing.
Community Center ‐ Adult (AERMOD Receptor ID: PSC‐2)
Annual
DPM CPF DBR ED EF AT TAH Risk
Year Activity (ug/m3) (mg/kg‐day)^‐1 (l/kg‐day) (years) (days) (70 years) (%) ASF (risk/million) 55 to 56 Site‐Wide & Phase 1 0.00313 1.1 290 0.50 350 25550 1 1 0.01 95th Percentile DBR 55 to 56 Phases 2 through 5 0.00364 1.1 290 0.50 350 25550 1 1 0.01 Total 0.01
Maximum Total 0.01
Appendix
A Page 118
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Roadway Screening Analysis Calculator
County specific tables containing estimates of risk and hazard impacts from roadways in the Bay Area.• Roadway Direction: Select the orientation that best matches the roadway. If the roadway orientation is neither clearly north-south nor east-west, use the highest values predicted from either orientation.• Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADT): Enter the annual average daily traffic on the roadway. These data may be collected from the city or the county (if the area is unincorporated).Notes and References listed below the Search BoxesSearch Parameters Results County Contra Costa CountyRoadway Direction EAST-WEST DIRECTIONAL ROADWAYSide of the Roadway PM2.5 annual averageDistance from Roadway 270 feet (μg/m3) Cancer Risk
20,900 (per million)
.
Data for Contra Costa County based on meteorological data collected from Chevron Refinery in 2005 Notes and References:
1. Emissions were developed using EMFAC2011 for fleet mix in 2014 assuming 10,000 AADT and includes impacts from diesel and gasoline vehicle exhaust, brake and tire wear, and resuspended dust.2. Roadways were modeled using CALINE4 air dispersion model assuming a source length of one kilometer. Meteorological data used to estimate the screening values are noted at the bottom of the “Re
3. Cancer risks were estimated for 70 year lifetime exposure starting in 2014 that includes sensitivity values for early life exposures and OEHHA toxicity values adopted in 2013.
Adjustment factor to account for updated OEHHA Guidance: 1.3744 Adjusted Cancer Risk: 2.84
INSTRUCTIONS:
Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2.07
0.052
Input the site-specific characteristics of your project by using the drop down menu in the “Search Parameter” box. We recommend that this analysis be used for roadways with 10,000 AADT and above.• County: Select the County where the project is located. The calculator is only applicable for projects within the nine Bay Area counties.• Side of the Roadway: Identify on which side of the roadway the project is located.• Distance from Roadway: Enter the distance in feet from the nearest edge of the roadway to the project site. The calculator estimates values for distances greater than 10feet and less than 1000 feet. For distances greater than 1000 feet, the user can choose to extrapolate values using a distribution curve or apply 1000 feet values for greater distances. When the user has completed the data entries, the screening level PM2.5 annual average concentration and the cancer risk results will appear in the Results Box on the right. Please note that the roadway tool is not applicable for California State Highways and the District refers the user to the Highway Screening Analysis Tool at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Planningand-Research/CEQA-GUIDELINES/Tools-and-Methodology.aspx Appendix A Page 119
Control Pathway
AERMOD
Flat & Elevated Terrain
No Stack-Tip Downwash (NOSTD)
Run in Screening Mode
Conversion of NOx to NO2 (OLM or PVMRM)
No Checks for Non-Sequential Met Data
Fast All Sources (FASTALL)
Fast Area Sources (FASTAREA)
Optimized Area Source Plume Depletion
Gas Deposition
BETA Options:
Capped and Horizontal Stack Releases
Adjusted Friction Velocity (u*) in AERMET (ADJ_U*)
Low Wind Options
SCIM (Sampled Chronological Input Model)
Ignore Urban Night / Daytime Transition (NOURBTRAN)
Total Deposition (Dry & Wet)
Dry Deposition
Wet Deposition
Output Type
Concentration
Regulatory Default Non-Default Options
Dispersion Options
21180006 Skelly Residential Project
Site-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development
Titles
Dispersion Options
Population:
Name (Optional):
Roughness Length:
Plume Depletion
Dry Removal
Wet Removal
Output Warnings
No Output Warnings
Non-fatal Warnings for Non-sequential Met Data
Dispersion Coefficient
Urban
Pollutant / Averaging Time / Terrain Options
TG: Meters
RE: Meters
1 2 3 4 6 8 12 24 Flat Elevated SO: Meters
Hours Terrain Height Options
Averaging Time Options
Yes No
Pollutant Type Exponential Decay
Month Period Annual
PM2.5
Flagpole Receptors
Yes No
Default Height = 1.50 m
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software CO - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 120
Control Pathway
AERMOD
Optional Files
Re-Start File Init File Multi-Year Analyses Event Input File Error Listing File Detailed Error Listing File
Filename: 21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.err
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software CO - 2 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 121
AERMOD View - Lakes Environmental Software C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc SCALE:
0.5 km
1:19,268
PROJECT NO.:
DATE:
4/12/2022
MODELER:
COMPANY NAME:
PROJECT TITLE: COMMENTS:
21180006 Skelly Residential Project
Site-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development
SOURCES:
RECEPTORS:
2291
OUTPUT TYPE:
Concentration
MAX:
8.9E-02 ug/m^3
Appendix A Page 122
Meteorology Pathway
AERMOD
Met Input Data
Surface Met Data
Profile Met Data
C:\Users\lpark\OneDrive - ADEC Solutions USA, Inc\Desktop\01. Project Files\2118.0006 Skelly Rd Residenti Default AERMET format
Filename:
Format Type:
Filename:
Format Type:
C:\Users\lpark\OneDrive - ADEC Solutions USA, Inc\Desktop\01. Project Files\2118.0006 Skelly Rd Residenti Potential Temperature Profile
Base Elevation above MSL (for Primary Met Tower): 4.30 [m] Wind Direction
Rotation Adjustment [deg]:
Meteorological Station Data
Upper Air
Station No. Year Station Name
Surface
Stations X Coordinate [m] Y Coordinate [m]
2009 Napa County Airport
2009 OAKLAND/WSO AP
Default AERMET format
Wind Speed
Wind Speeds are Vector Mean (Not Scalar Means)
Data Period
Start Date: 1/1/2009 Start Hour: 1 End Date: 1/2/2014 End Hour: 24 Data Period to Process
10.8 8.23
5.14 3.09
1.54 No Upper Bound
Wind Speed [m/s] Stability Category Wind Speed [m/s]
F
E
D
C
B
A
Stability Category
Wind Speed Categories
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software ME - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 123
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
Receptor Networks
Note: Terrain Elavations and Flagpole Heights for Network Grids are in Page RE2 - 1 (If applicable) Generated Discrete Receptors for Multi-Tier (Risk) Grid and Receptor Locations for Fenceline Grid are in Page RE3 - 1 (If applicable) Discrete Receptors
Discrete Cartesian Receptors
X-Coordinate [m] Y-Coordinate [m] Terrain Elevations
Flagpole Heights [m]
(Optional)
Record
Number
Group Name
(Optional)
1 562293.81 4207045.66 Res 2.33 1.50
2 562305.03 4207059.24 Res 2.40 1.50
3 562279.13 4207106.06 Res 2.44 1.50
4 562296.00 4207111.74 Res 2.39 1.50
5 562304.79 4207117.42 Res 2.80 1.50
6 562322.17 4207119.32 Res 3.52 1.50
7 562333.83 4207123.38 Res 3.89 1.50
8 562346.05 4207130.57 Res 4.17 1.50
9 562359.62 4207135.24 Res 4.36 1.50
10 562372.97 4207141.03 Res 4.53 1.50
11 562386.19 4207148.75 Res 4.70 1.50
12 562400.36 4207152.13 Res 4.82 1.50
13 562410.20 4207156.25 Res 4.91 1.50
14 562425.95 4207163.76 Res 5.16 1.50
15 562439.64 4207168.84 Res 5.52 1.50
16 562448.45 4207177.65 Res 6.40 1.50
17 562457.39 4207154.50 Res 5.95 1.50
18 562470.86 4207142.06 Res 6.55 1.50
19 562483.62 4207129.91 Res 7.26 1.50
20 562494.77 4207113.09 Res 8.05 1.50
21 562502.01 4207095.70 Res 9.33 1.50
22 562513.36 4207078.68 Res 10.75 1.50
23 562522.88 4207065.10 Res 12.32 1.50
24 562538.46 4207021.31 Res 15.95 1.50
25 562556.90 4207027.02 Res 17.04 1.50
26 562572.28 4207035.22 Res 17.67 1.50
27 562588.97 4207044.15 Res 20.29 1.50
28 562607.12 4207051.62 Res 24.74 1.50
29 562625.42 4207064.35 Res 26.31 1.50
30 562637.06 4207077.67 Res 26.83 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 124
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
31 562649.81 4207092.83 Res 27.36 1.50
32 562656.70 4207112.98 Res 27.08 1.50
33 562662.56 4207131.75 Res 27.73 1.50
34 562660.84 4207155.40 Res 28.13 1.50
35 562656.88 4207175.55 Res 28.69 1.50
36 562647.75 4207194.67 Res 28.39 1.50
37 562640.08 4207211.01 Res 27.82 1.50
38 562633.98 4207228.74 Res 27.25 1.50
39 562625.49 4207246.31 Res 26.26 1.50
40 562566.88 4207085.38 Res 14.28 1.50
41 562557.55 4207100.07 Res 12.93 1.50
42 562548.46 4207113.39 Res 12.76 1.50
43 562533.15 4207129.32 Res 12.53 1.50
44 562592.52 4207103.18 Res 19.23 1.50
45 562607.46 4207116.87 Res 20.81 1.50
46 562611.64 4207140.35 Res 21.80 1.50
47 562582.97 4207146.17 Res 18.36 1.50
48 562609.42 4207160.03 Res 22.13 1.50
49 562564.52 4207164.03 Res 16.81 1.50
50 562559.40 4207183.06 Res 16.77 1.50
51 562572.72 4207206.93 Res 18.65 1.50
52 562591.23 4207215.76 Res 21.15 1.50
53 562580.09 4207241.29 Res 21.94 1.50
54 562576.40 4207260.81 Res 21.15 1.50
55 562577.58 4207278.68 Res 19.68 1.50
56 562579.59 4207299.32 Res 15.88 1.50
57 562582.23 4207316.96 Res 14.03 1.50
58 562524.48 4207146.24 Res 12.34 1.50
59 562512.14 4207161.68 Res 11.32 1.50
60 562502.60 4207175.99 Res 10.94 1.50
61 562490.25 4207188.62 Res 11.09 1.50
62 562479.59 4207204.05 Res 11.34 1.50
63 562465.56 4207221.02 Res 10.64 1.50
64 562425.96 4207214.34 Res 5.86 1.50
65 562412.61 4207209.09 Res 5.16 1.50
66 562402.35 4207205.04 Res 4.97 1.50
67 562389.23 4207197.88 Res 4.73 1.50
68 562357.51 4207185.00 Res 4.28 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 2 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 125
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
69 562347.73 4207180.94 Res 4.13 1.50
70 562333.42 4207174.50 Res 3.85 1.50
71 562319.56 4207165.77 Res 3.47 1.50
72 562307.80 4207162.73 Res 3.03 1.50
73 562295.23 4207156.45 Res 2.48 1.50
74 562281.85 4207150.97 Res 2.35 1.50
75 562269.68 4207148.13 Res 2.43 1.50
76 562255.69 4207142.05 Res 2.58 1.50
77 562230.12 4206977.87 Res 4.33 1.50
78 562241.11 4206995.30 Res 4.08 1.50
79 562233.34 4207015.08 Res 4.02 1.50
80 562216.64 4207027.09 Res 4.14 1.50
81 562208.44 4207038.37 Res 4.13 1.50
82 562211.07 4206975.81 Res 4.60 1.50
83 562444.86 4206878.58 Res 10.34 1.50
84 562434.77 4206866.25 Res 9.91 1.50
85 562423.69 4206856.66 Res 9.42 1.50
86 562419.10 4206817.49 Res 8.63 1.50
87 562404.28 4206836.97 Res 8.51 1.50
88 562395.83 4206830.42 Res 8.11 1.50
89 562387.09 4206788.03 Res 6.39 1.50
90 562371.27 4206807.34 Res 5.70 1.50
91 562366.91 4206816.18 Res 5.86 1.50
92 562559.49 4206885.66 Res 16.49 1.50
93 562548.04 4206874.69 Res 14.22 1.50
94 562626.84 4206905.90 Res 29.57 1.50
95 562663.83 4206894.92 Res 32.30 1.50
96 562567.19 4206858.13 Res 16.23 1.50
97 562521.71 4206853.33 Res 12.07 1.50
98 562510.24 4206845.68 Res 11.70 1.50
99 562103.04 4206790.15 School 10.69 1.50
100 562122.03 4206757.18 School 6.68 1.50
101 562190.19 4206791.82 School 6.10 1.50
102 562183.24 4206803.74 School 6.14 1.50
103 562279.18 4206860.34 School 4.74 1.50
104 562263.31 4206884.83 School 4.63 1.50
105 562230.89 4206906.39 School 4.94 1.50
106 562192.97 4206912.57 School 5.30 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 3 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 126
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
107 562157.64 4206906.27 School 5.52 1.50
108 562134.18 4206893.22 School 6.06 1.50
109 562174.91 4206820.05 School 6.14 1.50
110 562105.41 4206786.03 School 9.69 1.50
111 562107.79 4206781.91 School 8.83 1.50
112 562110.16 4206777.79 School 8.11 1.50
113 562112.54 4206773.67 School 7.60 1.50
114 562114.91 4206769.54 School 7.28 1.50
115 562117.28 4206765.42 School 7.03 1.50
116 562119.66 4206761.30 School 6.82 1.50
117 562126.29 4206759.35 School 6.60 1.50
118 562130.55 4206761.51 School 6.57 1.50
119 562134.81 4206763.68 School 6.54 1.50
120 562139.07 4206765.84 School 6.51 1.50
121 562143.33 4206768.01 School 6.48 1.50
122 562147.59 4206770.17 School 6.44 1.50
123 562151.85 4206772.34 School 6.40 1.50
124 562156.11 4206774.50 School 6.36 1.50
125 562160.37 4206776.67 School 6.32 1.50
126 562164.63 4206778.83 School 6.28 1.50
127 562168.89 4206781.00 School 6.23 1.50
128 562173.15 4206783.16 School 6.19 1.50
129 562177.41 4206785.33 School 6.17 1.50
130 562181.67 4206787.49 School 6.15 1.50
131 562185.93 4206789.66 School 6.12 1.50
132 562187.87 4206795.79 School 6.11 1.50
133 562185.56 4206799.77 School 6.12 1.50
134 562187.41 4206806.20 School 6.11 1.50
135 562191.58 4206808.66 School 6.07 1.50
136 562195.75 4206811.12 School 6.02 1.50
137 562199.93 4206813.58 School 5.98 1.50
138 562204.10 4206816.04 School 5.95 1.50
139 562208.27 4206818.51 School 5.91 1.50
140 562212.44 4206820.97 School 5.88 1.50
141 562216.61 4206823.43 School 5.85 1.50
142 562220.78 4206825.89 School 5.83 1.50
143 562224.95 4206828.35 School 5.79 1.50
144 562229.12 4206830.81 School 5.76 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 4 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 127
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
145 562233.30 4206833.27 School 5.73 1.50
146 562237.47 4206835.73 School 5.70 1.50
147 562241.64 4206838.19 School 5.67 1.50
148 562245.81 4206840.65 School 5.62 1.50
149 562249.98 4206843.11 School 5.57 1.50
150 562254.15 4206845.58 School 5.51 1.50
151 562258.32 4206848.04 School 5.43 1.50
152 562262.49 4206850.50 School 5.35 1.50
153 562266.67 4206852.96 School 5.25 1.50
154 562270.84 4206855.42 School 5.13 1.50
155 562275.01 4206857.88 School 4.95 1.50
156 562276.54 4206864.42 School 4.72 1.50
157 562273.89 4206868.50 School 4.72 1.50
158 562271.25 4206872.59 School 4.73 1.50
159 562268.60 4206876.67 School 4.71 1.50
160 562265.96 4206880.75 School 4.67 1.50
161 562259.26 4206887.53 School 4.66 1.50
162 562255.21 4206890.22 School 4.71 1.50
163 562251.15 4206892.92 School 4.76 1.50
164 562247.10 4206895.61 School 4.81 1.50
165 562243.05 4206898.31 School 4.84 1.50
166 562239.00 4206901.00 School 4.86 1.50
167 562234.94 4206903.70 School 4.90 1.50
168 562226.15 4206907.16 School 5.02 1.50
169 562221.41 4206907.94 School 5.10 1.50
170 562216.67 4206908.71 School 5.14 1.50
171 562211.93 4206909.48 School 5.18 1.50
172 562207.19 4206910.25 School 5.21 1.50
173 562202.45 4206911.03 School 5.24 1.50
174 562197.71 4206911.80 School 5.27 1.50
175 562188.55 4206911.78 School 5.32 1.50
176 562184.14 4206911.00 School 5.34 1.50
177 562179.72 4206910.21 School 5.36 1.50
178 562175.31 4206909.42 School 5.38 1.50
179 562170.89 4206908.63 School 5.41 1.50
180 562166.47 4206907.85 School 5.44 1.50
181 562162.06 4206907.06 School 5.48 1.50
182 562153.73 4206904.10 School 5.57 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 5 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 128
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
183 562149.82 4206901.92 School 5.63 1.50
184 562145.91 4206899.75 School 5.70 1.50
185 562142.00 4206897.57 School 5.82 1.50
186 562138.09 4206895.40 School 5.94 1.50
187 562136.58 4206888.92 School 6.07 1.50
188 562138.97 4206884.61 School 6.08 1.50
189 562141.37 4206880.31 School 6.10 1.50
190 562143.76 4206876.00 School 6.12 1.50
191 562146.16 4206871.70 School 6.14 1.50
192 562148.56 4206867.40 School 6.16 1.50
193 562150.95 4206863.09 School 6.17 1.50
194 562153.35 4206858.79 School 6.18 1.50
195 562155.74 4206854.48 School 6.19 1.50
196 562158.14 4206850.18 School 6.20 1.50
197 562160.53 4206845.88 School 6.20 1.50
198 562162.93 4206841.57 School 6.21 1.50
199 562165.33 4206837.27 School 6.21 1.50
200 562167.72 4206832.96 School 6.19 1.50
201 562170.12 4206828.66 School 6.16 1.50
202 562172.51 4206824.35 School 6.14 1.50
203 562170.42 4206818.18 School 6.19 1.50
204 562165.93 4206816.31 School 6.27 1.50
205 562161.43 4206814.44 School 6.34 1.50
206 562156.94 4206812.58 School 6.41 1.50
207 562152.45 4206810.71 School 6.48 1.50
208 562147.96 4206808.84 School 6.55 1.50
209 562143.47 4206806.97 School 6.59 1.50
210 562138.98 4206805.10 School 6.62 1.50
211 562134.48 4206803.23 School 6.65 1.50
212 562129.99 4206801.36 School 6.68 1.50
213 562125.50 4206799.49 School 6.71 1.50
214 562121.01 4206797.63 School 7.34 1.50
215 562116.52 4206795.76 School 8.35 1.50
216 562112.02 4206793.89 School 9.25 1.50
217 562107.53 4206792.02 School 10.03 1.50
218 562242.15 4207189.12 Daycare 2.45 1.50
219 562255.39 4207158.50 Daycare 2.50 1.50
220 562235.26 4207149.71 Daycare 2.74 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 6 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 129
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
221 562227.31 4207163.59 Daycare 2.73 1.50
222 562225.09 4207175.24 Daycare 2.68 1.50
223 562229.54 4207184.67 Daycare 2.58 1.50
224 562244.04 4207184.75 Daycare 2.46 1.50
225 562245.93 4207180.37 Daycare 2.46 1.50
226 562247.82 4207176.00 Daycare 2.47 1.50
227 562249.72 4207171.62 Daycare 2.48 1.50
228 562251.61 4207167.25 Daycare 2.49 1.50
229 562253.50 4207162.87 Daycare 2.50 1.50
230 562251.36 4207156.74 Daycare 2.55 1.50
231 562247.34 4207154.98 Daycare 2.59 1.50
232 562243.31 4207153.23 Daycare 2.64 1.50
233 562239.29 4207151.47 Daycare 2.69 1.50
234 562233.27 4207153.18 Daycare 2.74 1.50
235 562231.29 4207156.65 Daycare 2.74 1.50
236 562229.30 4207160.12 Daycare 2.73 1.50
237 562226.57 4207167.47 Daycare 2.71 1.50
238 562225.83 4207171.36 Daycare 2.70 1.50
239 562226.57 4207178.38 Daycare 2.64 1.50
240 562228.06 4207181.53 Daycare 2.61 1.50
241 562233.74 4207186.15 Daycare 2.54 1.50
242 562237.95 4207187.64 Daycare 2.49 1.50
243 562185.94 4206803.18 School 6.12 1.50
244 562213.54 4206752.30 School 6.24 1.50
245 562243.21 4206767.30 School 6.11 1.50
246 562256.49 4206746.43 School 6.42 1.50
247 562333.43 4206801.29 School 4.81 1.50
248 562280.82 4206860.28 School 4.69 1.50
249 562188.24 4206798.94 School 6.11 1.50
250 562190.54 4206794.70 School 6.10 1.50
251 562192.84 4206790.46 School 6.09 1.50
252 562195.14 4206786.22 School 6.08 1.50
253 562197.44 4206781.98 School 6.07 1.50
254 562199.74 4206777.74 School 6.08 1.50
255 562202.04 4206773.50 School 6.10 1.50
256 562204.34 4206769.26 School 6.13 1.50
257 562206.64 4206765.02 School 6.16 1.50
258 562208.94 4206760.78 School 6.19 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 7 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 130
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
259 562211.24 4206756.54 School 6.21 1.50
260 562217.78 4206754.44 School 6.23 1.50
261 562222.02 4206756.59 School 6.22 1.50
262 562226.26 4206758.73 School 6.20 1.50
263 562230.49 4206760.87 School 6.19 1.50
264 562234.73 4206763.01 School 6.16 1.50
265 562238.97 4206765.16 School 6.14 1.50
266 562245.87 4206763.13 School 6.16 1.50
267 562248.52 4206758.95 School 6.22 1.50
268 562251.18 4206754.78 School 6.28 1.50
269 562253.83 4206750.60 School 6.35 1.50
270 562260.54 4206749.32 School 6.39 1.50
271 562264.59 4206752.21 School 6.36 1.50
272 562268.64 4206755.09 School 6.33 1.50
273 562272.69 4206757.98 School 6.30 1.50
274 562276.74 4206760.87 School 6.27 1.50
275 562280.79 4206763.75 School 6.24 1.50
276 562284.84 4206766.64 School 6.20 1.50
277 562288.89 4206769.53 School 6.17 1.50
278 562292.94 4206772.42 School 6.14 1.50
279 562296.98 4206775.30 School 6.10 1.50
280 562301.03 4206778.19 School 6.04 1.50
281 562305.08 4206781.08 School 5.98 1.50
282 562309.13 4206783.97 School 5.92 1.50
283 562313.18 4206786.85 School 5.85 1.50
284 562317.23 4206789.74 School 5.78 1.50
285 562321.28 4206792.63 School 5.62 1.50
286 562325.33 4206795.52 School 5.39 1.50
287 562329.38 4206798.40 School 5.12 1.50
288 562330.14 4206804.98 School 4.82 1.50
289 562326.85 4206808.66 School 4.87 1.50
290 562323.57 4206812.35 School 4.93 1.50
291 562320.28 4206816.04 School 4.92 1.50
292 562316.99 4206819.72 School 4.83 1.50
293 562313.70 4206823.41 School 4.76 1.50
294 562310.41 4206827.10 School 4.73 1.50
295 562307.13 4206830.79 School 4.74 1.50
296 562303.84 4206834.47 School 4.79 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 8 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 131
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
297 562300.55 4206838.16 School 4.87 1.50
298 562297.26 4206841.85 School 4.93 1.50
299 562293.97 4206845.53 School 4.92 1.50
300 562290.68 4206849.22 School 4.83 1.50
301 562287.40 4206852.91 School 4.76 1.50
302 562284.11 4206856.59 School 4.71 1.50
303 562276.69 4206857.80 School 4.90 1.50
304 562272.57 4206855.32 School 5.08 1.50
305 562268.44 4206852.83 School 5.23 1.50
306 562264.32 4206850.35 School 5.33 1.50
307 562260.19 4206847.87 School 5.41 1.50
308 562256.07 4206845.38 School 5.49 1.50
309 562251.94 4206842.90 School 5.56 1.50
310 562247.82 4206840.42 School 5.61 1.50
311 562243.69 4206837.94 School 5.66 1.50
312 562239.57 4206835.45 School 5.69 1.50
313 562235.44 4206832.97 School 5.72 1.50
314 562231.32 4206830.49 School 5.75 1.50
315 562227.19 4206828.01 School 5.78 1.50
316 562223.07 4206825.52 School 5.82 1.50
317 562218.94 4206823.04 School 5.85 1.50
318 562214.82 4206820.56 School 5.87 1.50
319 562210.69 4206818.08 School 5.91 1.50
320 562206.57 4206815.59 School 5.94 1.50
321 562202.44 4206813.11 School 5.97 1.50
322 562198.32 4206810.63 School 6.01 1.50
323 562194.19 4206808.15 School 6.05 1.50
324 562190.07 4206805.66 School 6.09 1.50
325 562305.93 4206897.31 5.25 1.50
326 562330.42 4206909.56 7.31 1.50
327 562362.85 4206855.73 7.44 1.50
328 562343.02 4206842.45 5.25 1.50
329 562310.01 4206899.35 5.80 1.50
330 562314.09 4206901.39 6.34 1.50
331 562318.18 4206903.44 6.82 1.50
332 562322.26 4206905.48 7.00 1.50
333 562326.34 4206907.52 7.16 1.50
334 562332.91 4206905.42 7.36 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 9 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 132
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
335 562335.41 4206901.28 7.44 1.50
336 562337.90 4206897.14 7.45 1.50
337 562340.40 4206893.00 7.49 1.50
338 562342.89 4206888.86 7.55 1.50
339 562345.39 4206884.72 7.57 1.50
340 562347.88 4206880.58 7.58 1.50
341 562350.38 4206876.43 7.59 1.50
342 562352.87 4206872.29 7.60 1.50
343 562355.37 4206868.15 7.56 1.50
344 562357.86 4206864.01 7.47 1.50
345 562360.36 4206859.87 7.43 1.50
346 562358.88 4206853.07 7.09 1.50
347 562354.92 4206850.42 6.71 1.50
348 562350.95 4206847.76 6.27 1.50
349 562346.99 4206845.11 5.79 1.50
350 562340.37 4206846.37 5.38 1.50
351 562337.72 4206850.29 5.48 1.50
352 562335.07 4206854.21 5.53 1.50
353 562332.42 4206858.12 5.53 1.50
354 562329.77 4206862.04 5.50 1.50
355 562327.12 4206865.96 5.41 1.50
356 562324.48 4206869.88 5.29 1.50
357 562321.83 4206873.80 5.25 1.50
358 562319.18 4206877.72 5.26 1.50
359 562316.53 4206881.64 5.34 1.50
360 562313.88 4206885.55 5.40 1.50
361 562311.23 4206889.47 5.41 1.50
362 562308.58 4206893.39 5.36 1.50
363 562303.47 4206592.57 9.32 1.50
364 562344.28 4206615.31 8.59 1.50
365 562373.32 4206568.00 8.40 1.50
366 562334.13 4206544.65 9.25 1.50
367 562307.55 4206594.84 9.25 1.50
368 562311.63 4206597.12 9.18 1.50
369 562315.71 4206599.39 9.11 1.50
370 562319.79 4206601.67 9.04 1.50
371 562323.88 4206603.94 8.96 1.50
372 562327.96 4206606.21 8.88 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 10 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 133
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
373 562332.04 4206608.49 8.80 1.50
374 562336.12 4206610.76 8.73 1.50
375 562340.20 4206613.04 8.66 1.50
376 562346.70 4206611.37 8.59 1.50
377 562349.12 4206607.43 8.59 1.50
378 562351.54 4206603.48 8.58 1.50
379 562353.96 4206599.54 8.58 1.50
380 562356.38 4206595.60 8.57 1.50
381 562358.80 4206591.66 8.56 1.50
382 562361.22 4206587.71 8.54 1.50
383 562363.64 4206583.77 8.52 1.50
384 562366.06 4206579.83 8.49 1.50
385 562368.48 4206575.89 8.46 1.50
386 562370.90 4206571.94 8.43 1.50
387 562369.40 4206565.67 8.49 1.50
388 562365.48 4206563.33 8.58 1.50
389 562361.56 4206561.00 8.67 1.50
390 562357.64 4206558.66 8.76 1.50
391 562353.73 4206556.33 8.84 1.50
392 562349.81 4206553.99 8.93 1.50
393 562345.89 4206551.66 9.01 1.50
394 562341.97 4206549.32 9.09 1.50
395 562338.05 4206546.99 9.17 1.50
396 562331.58 4206548.64 9.28 1.50
397 562329.02 4206552.64 9.31 1.50
398 562326.47 4206556.63 9.34 1.50
399 562323.91 4206560.62 9.36 1.50
400 562321.36 4206564.62 9.38 1.50
401 562318.80 4206568.61 9.38 1.50
402 562316.25 4206572.60 9.38 1.50
403 562313.69 4206576.60 9.37 1.50
404 562311.14 4206580.59 9.36 1.50
405 562308.58 4206584.58 9.35 1.50
406 562306.03 4206588.58 9.34 1.50
Plant Boundary Receptors
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 11 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 134
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
Receptor Groups
Group ID Group Description
Record
Number
1 FENCEPRI Cartesian plant boundary Primary Receptors
2 FENCEINT Cartesian plant boundary Intermediate Receptors 3 Res
4 School
5 Daycare
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 12 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc Appendix A Page 135
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.01444 ug/m^3 R-1 562293.81 4207045.66 2.33 1.50 2.33 PERIOD 0.01762 ug/m^3 R-2 562305.03 4207059.24 2.40 1.50 2.40 PERIOD 0.00946 ug/m^3 R-3 562279.13 4207106.06 2.44 1.50 2.44 PERIOD 0.01054 ug/m^3 R-4 562296.00 4207111.74 2.39 1.50 2.39 PERIOD 0.01107 ug/m^3 R-5 562304.79 4207117.42 2.80 1.50 2.80 PERIOD 0.01947 ug/m^3 R-6 562322.17 4207119.32 3.52 1.50 3.52 PERIOD 0.02536 ug/m^3 R-7 562333.83 4207123.38 3.89 1.50 3.89 PERIOD 0.02793 ug/m^3 R-8 562346.05 4207130.57 4.17 1.50 4.17 PERIOD 0.03219 ug/m^3 R-9 562359.62 4207135.24 4.36 1.50 4.36 PERIOD 0.03439 ug/m^3 R-10 562372.97 4207141.03 4.53 1.50 4.53 PERIOD 0.03376 ug/m^3 R-11 562386.19 4207148.75 4.70 1.50 4.70 PERIOD 0.03757 ug/m^3 R-12 562400.36 4207152.13 4.82 1.50 4.82 PERIOD 0.03732 ug/m^3 R-13 562410.20 4207156.25 4.91 1.50 30.41 PERIOD 0.03502 ug/m^3 R-14 562425.95 4207163.76 5.16 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.03327 ug/m^3 R-15 562439.64 4207168.84 5.52 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.02876 ug/m^3 R-16 562448.45 4207177.65 6.40 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.04165 ug/m^3 R-17 562457.39 4207154.50 5.95 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.04431 ug/m^3 R-18 562470.86 4207142.06 6.55 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.04235 ug/m^3 R-19 562483.62 4207129.91 7.26 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.04172 ug/m^3 R-20 562494.77 4207113.09 8.05 1.50 32.49 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 1 of 21
Appendix
A Page 136
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.04033 ug/m^3 R-21 562502.01 4207095.70 9.33 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.03526 ug/m^3 R-22 562513.36 4207078.68 10.75 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.02911 ug/m^3 R-23 562522.88 4207065.10 12.32 1.50 31.59 PERIOD 0.01498 ug/m^3 R-24 562538.46 4207021.31 15.95 1.50 31.53 PERIOD 0.01109 ug/m^3 R-25 562556.90 4207027.02 17.04 1.50 27.75 PERIOD 0.00914 ug/m^3 R-26 562572.28 4207035.22 17.67 1.50 30.32 PERIOD 0.00725 ug/m^3 R-27 562588.97 4207044.15 20.29 1.50 27.75 PERIOD 0.00556 ug/m^3 R-28 562607.12 4207051.62 24.74 1.50 25.65 PERIOD 0.00476 ug/m^3 R-29 562625.42 4207064.35 26.31 1.50 26.31 PERIOD 0.00442 ug/m^3 R-30 562637.06 4207077.67 26.83 1.50 26.83 PERIOD 0.00406 ug/m^3 R-31 562649.81 4207092.83 27.36 1.50 27.36 PERIOD 0.00396 ug/m^3 R-32 562656.70 4207112.98 27.08 1.50 27.08 PERIOD 0.00379 ug/m^3 R-33 562662.56 4207131.75 27.73 1.50 30.36 PERIOD 0.00386 ug/m^3 R-34 562660.84 4207155.39 28.13 1.50 31.48 PERIOD 0.00396 ug/m^3 R-35 562656.88 4207175.55 28.69 1.50 31.48 PERIOD 0.00428 ug/m^3 R-36 562647.75 4207194.67 28.39 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00456 ug/m^3 R-37 562640.08 4207211.01 27.82 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00476 ug/m^3 R-38 562633.98 4207228.74 27.25 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00504 ug/m^3 R-39 562625.49 4207246.31 26.26 1.50 32.37 PERIOD 0.01347 ug/m^3 R-40 562566.88 4207085.38 14.28 1.50 32.49 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 2 of 21
Appendix
A Page 137
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.01616 ug/m^3 R-41 562557.55 4207100.07 12.93 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01813 ug/m^3 R-42 562548.46 4207113.39 12.76 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.02101 ug/m^3 R-43 562533.15 4207129.32 12.53 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00863 ug/m^3 R-44 562592.52 4207103.18 19.23 1.50 31.64 PERIOD 0.00711 ug/m^3 R-45 562607.46 4207116.87 20.81 1.50 31.64 PERIOD 0.00669 ug/m^3 R-46 562611.64 4207140.35 21.80 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00968 ug/m^3 R-47 562582.97 4207146.17 18.36 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00673 ug/m^3 R-48 562609.42 4207160.03 22.13 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01174 ug/m^3 R-49 562564.52 4207164.03 16.81 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01162 ug/m^3 R-50 562559.40 4207183.06 16.77 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00925 ug/m^3 R-51 562572.72 4207206.93 18.65 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00744 ug/m^3 R-52 562591.23 4207215.76 21.15 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00746 ug/m^3 R-53 562580.09 4207241.29 21.94 1.50 32.37 PERIOD 0.00724 ug/m^3 R-54 562576.40 4207260.81 21.15 1.50 32.37 PERIOD 0.00688 ug/m^3 R-55 562577.58 4207278.68 19.68 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00660 ug/m^3 R-56 562579.59 4207299.32 15.88 1.50 32.39 PERIOD 0.00622 ug/m^3 R-57 562582.23 4207316.96 14.03 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.02122 ug/m^3 R-58 562524.48 4207146.24 12.34 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.02207 ug/m^3 R-59 562512.14 4207161.68 11.32 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.02158 ug/m^3 R-60 562502.60 4207175.99 10.94 1.50 32.49 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 3 of 21
Appendix
A Page 138
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.02080 ug/m^3 R-61 562490.25 4207188.62 11.09 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01856 ug/m^3 R-62 562479.59 4207204.05 11.34 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01598 ug/m^3 R-63 562465.56 4207221.02 10.64 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01604 ug/m^3 R-64 562425.96 4207214.34 5.87 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01550 ug/m^3 R-65 562412.61 4207209.09 5.16 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01475 ug/m^3 R-66 562402.35 4207205.04 4.97 1.50 14.10 PERIOD 0.01392 ug/m^3 R-67 562389.23 4207197.88 4.73 1.50 4.73 PERIOD 0.01044 ug/m^3 R-68 562357.51 4207185.00 4.28 1.50 4.28 PERIOD 0.00923 ug/m^3 R-69 562347.73 4207180.94 4.13 1.50 4.13 PERIOD 0.00750 ug/m^3 R-70 562333.42 4207174.50 3.85 1.50 3.85 PERIOD 0.00628 ug/m^3 R-71 562319.56 4207165.77 3.47 1.50 3.47 PERIOD 0.00514 ug/m^3 R-72 562307.80 4207162.73 3.03 1.50 3.03 PERIOD 0.00465 ug/m^3 R-73 562295.23 4207156.45 2.48 1.50 2.48 PERIOD 0.00437 ug/m^3 R-74 562281.85 4207150.97 2.35 1.50 2.35 PERIOD 0.00417 ug/m^3 R-75 562269.68 4207148.13 2.43 1.50 2.43 PERIOD 0.00425 ug/m^3 R-76 562255.69 4207142.05 2.58 1.50 2.58 PERIOD 0.00473 ug/m^3 R-77 562230.12 4206977.87 4.33 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00661 ug/m^3 R-78 562241.11 4206995.30 4.08 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00680 ug/m^3 R-79 562233.34 4207015.08 4.02 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00607 ug/m^3 R-80 562216.64 4207027.09 4.14 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 4 of 21
Appendix
A Page 139
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00580 ug/m^3 R-81 562208.44 4207038.37 4.13 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00381 ug/m^3 R-82 562211.07 4206975.81 4.60 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00273 ug/m^3 R-83 562444.86 4206878.58 10.34 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00251 ug/m^3 R-84 562434.77 4206866.25 9.91 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00237 ug/m^3 R-85 562423.69 4206856.66 9.42 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00181 ug/m^3 R-86 562419.10 4206817.49 8.63 1.50 44.03 PERIOD 0.00207 ug/m^3 R-87 562404.28 4206836.97 8.51 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00197 ug/m^3 R-88 562395.83 4206830.42 8.11 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00150 ug/m^3 R-89 562387.09 4206788.03 6.39 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00166 ug/m^3 R-90 562371.27 4206807.34 5.70 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00173 ug/m^3 R-91 562366.91 4206816.18 5.86 1.50 34.43 PERIOD 0.00115 ug/m^3 R-92 562559.49 4206885.66 16.49 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00125 ug/m^3 R-93 562548.04 4206874.68 14.22 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00081 ug/m^3 R-94 562626.84 4206905.90 29.57 1.50 31.53 PERIOD 0.00063 ug/m^3 R-95 562663.83 4206894.92 32.30 1.50 32.30 PERIOD 0.00088 ug/m^3 R-96 562567.19 4206858.13 16.23 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00146 ug/m^3 R-97 562521.71 4206853.33 12.07 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00153 ug/m^3 R-98 562510.24 4206845.68 11.70 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-1 562103.04 4206790.15 10.69 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-2 562122.03 4206757.18 6.68 1.50 50.63 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 5 of 21
Appendix
A Page 140
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-3 562190.19 4206791.82 6.10 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-4 562183.24 4206803.74 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00109 ug/m^3 LCBMS-5 562279.18 4206860.34 4.74 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00102 ug/m^3 LCBMS-6 562263.31 4206884.83 4.63 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00092 ug/m^3 LCBMS-7 562230.89 4206906.39 4.94 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00091 ug/m^3 LCBMS-8 562192.97 4206912.57 5.30 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00076 ug/m^3 LCBMS-9 562157.64 4206906.27 5.52 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00059 ug/m^3 LCBMS-10 562134.18 4206893.22 6.06 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-11 562174.91 4206820.05 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-12 562105.41 4206786.03 9.69 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-13 562107.79 4206781.91 8.83 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-14 562110.16 4206777.79 8.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-15 562112.54 4206773.67 7.60 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-16 562114.91 4206769.54 7.28 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-17 562117.28 4206765.42 7.03 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-18 562119.66 4206761.30 6.82 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-19 562126.29 4206759.35 6.60 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-20 562130.55 4206761.51 6.57 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00019 ug/m^3 LCBMS-21 562134.81 4206763.68 6.54 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00019 ug/m^3 LCBMS-22 562139.07 4206765.84 6.51 1.50 50.63 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 6 of 21
Appendix
A Page 141
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00020 ug/m^3 LCBMS-23 562143.33 4206768.01 6.48 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00020 ug/m^3 LCBMS-24 562147.59 4206770.17 6.44 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00021 ug/m^3 LCBMS-25 562151.85 4206772.34 6.40 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00022 ug/m^3 LCBMS-26 562156.11 4206774.50 6.36 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00023 ug/m^3 LCBMS-27 562160.37 4206776.67 6.32 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00023 ug/m^3 LCBMS-28 562164.63 4206778.83 6.28 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00024 ug/m^3 LCBMS-29 562168.89 4206781.00 6.23 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-30 562173.15 4206783.16 6.19 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 LCBMS-31 562177.41 4206785.33 6.17 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00028 ug/m^3 LCBMS-32 562181.67 4206787.49 6.15 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00029 ug/m^3 LCBMS-33 562185.93 4206789.66 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-34 562187.87 4206795.79 6.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-35 562185.56 4206799.77 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 LCBMS-36 562187.41 4206806.20 6.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 LCBMS-37 562191.58 4206808.66 6.07 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 LCBMS-38 562195.75 4206811.12 6.02 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 LCBMS-39 562199.93 4206813.58 5.98 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00037 ug/m^3 LCBMS-40 562204.10 4206816.04 5.95 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 LCBMS-41 562208.27 4206818.51 5.91 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 LCBMS-42 562212.44 4206820.97 5.88 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 7 of 21
Appendix
A Page 142
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 LCBMS-43 562216.61 4206823.43 5.85 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00045 ug/m^3 LCBMS-44 562220.78 4206825.89 5.83 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00047 ug/m^3 LCBMS-45 562224.95 4206828.35 5.79 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 LCBMS-46 562229.12 4206830.81 5.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00053 ug/m^3 LCBMS-47 562233.30 4206833.27 5.73 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00056 ug/m^3 LCBMS-48 562237.47 4206835.73 5.70 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00059 ug/m^3 LCBMS-49 562241.64 4206838.19 5.67 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00063 ug/m^3 LCBMS-50 562245.81 4206840.65 5.62 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00067 ug/m^3 LCBMS-51 562249.98 4206843.11 5.57 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00071 ug/m^3 LCBMS-52 562254.15 4206845.58 5.51 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00076 ug/m^3 LCBMS-53 562258.32 4206848.04 5.43 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00081 ug/m^3 LCBMS-54 562262.49 4206850.50 5.35 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00087 ug/m^3 LCBMS-55 562266.67 4206852.96 5.25 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00094 ug/m^3 LCBMS-56 562270.84 4206855.42 5.13 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00101 ug/m^3 LCBMS-57 562275.01 4206857.88 4.95 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00108 ug/m^3 LCBMS-58 562276.54 4206864.42 4.72 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00106 ug/m^3 LCBMS-59 562273.89 4206868.50 4.72 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00105 ug/m^3 LCBMS-60 562271.25 4206872.59 4.73 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00104 ug/m^3 LCBMS-61 562268.60 4206876.67 4.71 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00102 ug/m^3 LCBMS-62 562265.95 4206880.75 4.67 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 8 of 21
Appendix
A Page 143
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00098 ug/m^3 LCBMS-63 562259.26 4206887.53 4.66 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00095 ug/m^3 LCBMS-64 562255.20 4206890.22 4.71 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00093 ug/m^3 LCBMS-65 562251.15 4206892.92 4.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00091 ug/m^3 LCBMS-66 562247.10 4206895.61 4.81 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-67 562243.05 4206898.31 4.84 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-68 562239.00 4206901.00 4.86 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00091 ug/m^3 LCBMS-69 562234.94 4206903.70 4.90 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00091 ug/m^3 LCBMS-70 562226.15 4206907.16 5.02 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-71 562221.41 4206907.93 5.10 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-72 562216.67 4206908.71 5.14 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-73 562211.93 4206909.48 5.18 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-74 562207.19 4206910.25 5.21 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-75 562202.45 4206911.03 5.24 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 LCBMS-76 562197.71 4206911.80 5.27 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00089 ug/m^3 LCBMS-77 562188.55 4206911.78 5.32 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00086 ug/m^3 LCBMS-78 562184.14 4206911.00 5.34 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00085 ug/m^3 LCBMS-79 562179.72 4206910.21 5.36 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00083 ug/m^3 LCBMS-80 562175.31 4206909.42 5.38 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00081 ug/m^3 LCBMS-81 562170.89 4206908.63 5.41 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00079 ug/m^3 LCBMS-82 562166.47 4206907.85 5.44 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 9 of 21
Appendix
A Page 144
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00077 ug/m^3 LCBMS-83 562162.06 4206907.06 5.48 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 LCBMS-84 562153.73 4206904.10 5.57 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00069 ug/m^3 LCBMS-85 562149.82 4206901.92 5.63 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00066 ug/m^3 LCBMS-86 562145.91 4206899.75 5.70 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00064 ug/m^3 LCBMS-87 562142.00 4206897.57 5.82 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00061 ug/m^3 LCBMS-88 562138.09 4206895.39 5.94 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00055 ug/m^3 LCBMS-89 562136.58 4206888.92 6.07 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 LCBMS-90 562138.97 4206884.61 6.08 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00049 ug/m^3 LCBMS-91 562141.37 4206880.31 6.10 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00046 ug/m^3 LCBMS-92 562143.76 4206876.00 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 LCBMS-93 562146.16 4206871.70 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 LCBMS-94 562148.56 4206867.39 6.16 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 LCBMS-95 562150.95 4206863.09 6.17 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 LCBMS-96 562153.35 4206858.79 6.18 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 LCBMS-97 562155.74 4206854.48 6.19 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 LCBMS-98 562158.14 4206850.18 6.20 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 LCBMS-99 562160.53 4206845.88 6.20 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 LCBMS-100 562162.93 4206841.57 6.21 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 LCBMS-101 562165.33 4206837.27 6.21 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-102 562167.72 4206832.96 6.19 1.50 50.63 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 10 of 21
Appendix
A Page 145
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 LCBMS-103 562170.12 4206828.66 6.16 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-104 562172.51 4206824.35 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00028 ug/m^3 LCBMS-105 562170.42 4206818.18 6.19 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 LCBMS-106 562165.93 4206816.31 6.27 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 LCBMS-107 562161.43 4206814.44 6.34 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 LCBMS-108 562156.94 4206812.58 6.41 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-109 562152.45 4206810.71 6.48 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00024 ug/m^3 LCBMS-110 562147.96 4206808.84 6.55 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00023 ug/m^3 LCBMS-111 562143.47 4206806.97 6.59 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00023 ug/m^3 LCBMS-112 562138.98 4206805.10 6.62 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00022 ug/m^3 LCBMS-113 562134.48 4206803.23 6.65 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00021 ug/m^3 LCBMS-114 562129.99 4206801.36 6.68 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00021 ug/m^3 LCBMS-115 562125.50 4206799.49 6.71 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00020 ug/m^3 LCBMS-116 562121.01 4206797.63 7.34 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00019 ug/m^3 LCBMS-117 562116.52 4206795.76 8.35 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-118 562112.02 4206793.89 9.25 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-119 562107.53 4206792.02 10.03 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00199 ug/m^3 LAFD-1 562242.15 4207189.12 2.45 1.50 2.45 PERIOD 0.00326 ug/m^3 LAFD-2 562255.39 4207158.50 2.50 1.50 2.50 PERIOD 0.00341 ug/m^3 LAFD-3 562235.26 4207149.71 2.74 1.50 2.74 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 11 of 21
Appendix
A Page 146
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00270 ug/m^3 LAFD-4 562227.31 4207163.59 2.73 1.50 2.73 PERIOD 0.00227 ug/m^3 LAFD-5 562225.09 4207175.24 2.68 1.50 2.68 PERIOD 0.00203 ug/m^3 LAFD-6 562229.54 4207184.67 2.58 1.50 2.58 PERIOD 0.00212 ug/m^3 LAFD-7 562244.04 4207184.75 2.46 1.50 2.46 PERIOD 0.00227 ug/m^3 LAFD-8 562245.93 4207180.37 2.46 1.50 2.46 PERIOD 0.00243 ug/m^3 LAFD-9 562247.82 4207176.00 2.47 1.50 2.47 PERIOD 0.00261 ug/m^3 LAFD-10 562249.72 4207171.62 2.48 1.50 2.48 PERIOD 0.00280 ug/m^3 LAFD-11 562251.61 4207167.25 2.49 1.50 2.49 PERIOD 0.00302 ug/m^3 LAFD-12 562253.50 4207162.87 2.50 1.50 2.50 PERIOD 0.00329 ug/m^3 LAFD-13 562251.36 4207156.74 2.55 1.50 2.55 PERIOD 0.00332 ug/m^3 LAFD-14 562247.34 4207154.98 2.59 1.50 2.59 PERIOD 0.00335 ug/m^3 LAFD-15 562243.31 4207153.23 2.64 1.50 2.64 PERIOD 0.00338 ug/m^3 LAFD-16 562239.29 4207151.47 2.69 1.50 2.69 PERIOD 0.00321 ug/m^3 LAFD-17 562233.27 4207153.18 2.74 1.50 2.74 PERIOD 0.00303 ug/m^3 LAFD-18 562231.29 4207156.65 2.74 1.50 2.74 PERIOD 0.00286 ug/m^3 LAFD-19 562229.30 4207160.12 2.73 1.50 2.73 PERIOD 0.00255 ug/m^3 LAFD-20 562226.57 4207167.47 2.71 1.50 2.71 PERIOD 0.00241 ug/m^3 LAFD-21 562225.83 4207171.36 2.70 1.50 2.70 PERIOD 0.00219 ug/m^3 LAFD-22 562226.57 4207178.38 2.64 1.50 2.64 PERIOD 0.00210 ug/m^3 LAFD-23 562228.06 4207181.53 2.61 1.50 2.61 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 12 of 21
Appendix
A Page 147
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00201 ug/m^3 LAFD-24 562233.74 4207186.15 2.54 1.50 2.54 PERIOD 0.00200 ug/m^3 LAFD-25 562237.95 4207187.64 2.49 1.50 2.49 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 PCP-1 562185.94 4206803.18 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 PCP-2 562213.54 4206752.30 6.24 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00049 ug/m^3 PCP-3 562243.21 4206767.30 6.11 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 PCP-4 562256.49 4206746.43 6.42 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00131 ug/m^3 PCP-5 562333.43 4206801.29 4.81 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00111 ug/m^3 PCP-6 562280.82 4206860.28 4.69 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 PCP-7 562188.24 4206798.94 6.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 PCP-8 562190.54 4206794.70 6.10 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 PCP-9 562192.84 4206790.46 6.09 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 PCP-10 562195.14 4206786.22 6.08 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 PCP-11 562197.44 4206781.98 6.07 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 PCP-12 562199.74 4206777.74 6.08 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 PCP-13 562202.04 4206773.50 6.10 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 PCP-14 562204.34 4206769.26 6.13 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 PCP-15 562206.64 4206765.02 6.16 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 PCP-16 562208.94 4206760.78 6.19 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 PCP-17 562211.24 4206756.54 6.21 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 PCP-18 562217.78 4206754.44 6.23 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 13 of 21
Appendix
A Page 148
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 PCP-19 562222.02 4206756.59 6.22 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 PCP-20 562226.26 4206758.73 6.20 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 PCP-21 562230.49 4206760.87 6.19 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 PCP-22 562234.73 4206763.01 6.16 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00047 ug/m^3 PCP-23 562238.97 4206765.16 6.14 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 PCP-24 562245.87 4206763.13 6.16 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 PCP-25 562248.52 4206758.95 6.22 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00051 ug/m^3 PCP-26 562251.18 4206754.78 6.28 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00051 ug/m^3 PCP-27 562253.83 4206750.60 6.35 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00054 ug/m^3 PCP-28 562260.54 4206749.32 6.39 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00057 ug/m^3 PCP-29 562264.59 4206752.21 6.36 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00060 ug/m^3 PCP-30 562268.64 4206755.09 6.33 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00063 ug/m^3 PCP-31 562272.69 4206757.98 6.30 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00066 ug/m^3 PCP-32 562276.74 4206760.87 6.27 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00069 ug/m^3 PCP-33 562280.79 4206763.75 6.24 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 PCP-34 562284.84 4206766.64 6.20 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00076 ug/m^3 PCP-35 562288.89 4206769.53 6.17 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00080 ug/m^3 PCP-36 562292.94 4206772.42 6.14 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00084 ug/m^3 PCP-37 562296.98 4206775.30 6.10 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00088 ug/m^3 PCP-38 562301.03 4206778.19 6.04 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 14 of 21
Appendix
A Page 149
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00092 ug/m^3 PCP-39 562305.08 4206781.08 5.98 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00097 ug/m^3 PCP-40 562309.13 4206783.97 5.92 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00102 ug/m^3 PCP-41 562313.18 4206786.85 5.85 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00107 ug/m^3 PCP-42 562317.23 4206789.74 5.78 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00113 ug/m^3 PCP-43 562321.28 4206792.63 5.62 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00118 ug/m^3 PCP-44 562325.33 4206795.51 5.39 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00125 ug/m^3 PCP-45 562329.38 4206798.40 5.12 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00131 ug/m^3 PCP-46 562330.14 4206804.98 4.82 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00131 ug/m^3 PCP-47 562326.85 4206808.66 4.87 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00130 ug/m^3 PCP-48 562323.57 4206812.35 4.93 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00130 ug/m^3 PCP-49 562320.28 4206816.04 4.92 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00130 ug/m^3 PCP-50 562316.99 4206819.72 4.83 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00129 ug/m^3 PCP-51 562313.70 4206823.41 4.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00128 ug/m^3 PCP-52 562310.41 4206827.10 4.73 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00127 ug/m^3 PCP-53 562307.13 4206830.79 4.74 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00125 ug/m^3 PCP-54 562303.84 4206834.47 4.79 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00124 ug/m^3 PCP-55 562300.55 4206838.16 4.87 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00122 ug/m^3 PCP-56 562297.26 4206841.85 4.93 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00120 ug/m^3 PCP-57 562293.97 4206845.53 4.92 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00118 ug/m^3 PCP-58 562290.68 4206849.22 4.83 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 15 of 21
Appendix
A Page 150
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00116 ug/m^3 PCP-59 562287.40 4206852.91 4.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00114 ug/m^3 PCP-60 562284.11 4206856.59 4.71 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00103 ug/m^3 PCP-61 562276.69 4206857.80 4.90 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00096 ug/m^3 PCP-62 562272.57 4206855.32 5.08 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00089 ug/m^3 PCP-63 562268.44 4206852.83 5.23 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00083 ug/m^3 PCP-64 562264.32 4206850.35 5.33 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00078 ug/m^3 PCP-65 562260.19 4206847.87 5.41 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00073 ug/m^3 PCP-66 562256.07 4206845.38 5.49 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00069 ug/m^3 PCP-67 562251.94 4206842.90 5.56 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00064 ug/m^3 PCP-68 562247.82 4206840.42 5.61 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00061 ug/m^3 PCP-69 562243.69 4206837.94 5.66 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00057 ug/m^3 PCP-70 562239.57 4206835.45 5.69 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00054 ug/m^3 PCP-71 562235.44 4206832.97 5.72 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00051 ug/m^3 PCP-72 562231.32 4206830.49 5.75 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00048 ug/m^3 PCP-73 562227.19 4206828.01 5.78 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00046 ug/m^3 PCP-74 562223.07 4206825.52 5.82 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 PCP-75 562218.94 4206823.04 5.85 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 PCP-76 562214.82 4206820.56 5.87 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 PCP-77 562210.69 4206818.08 5.91 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 PCP-78 562206.57 4206815.59 5.94 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 16 of 21
Appendix
A Page 151
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 PCP-79 562202.44 4206813.11 5.97 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 PCP-80 562198.32 4206810.63 6.01 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 PCP-81 562194.19 4206808.14 6.05 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 PCP-82 562190.07 4206805.66 6.09 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00217 ug/m^3 PSC-1 562305.93 4206897.31 5.25 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00313 ug/m^3 PSC-2 562330.42 4206909.56 7.31 1.50 7.31 PERIOD 0.00220 ug/m^3 PSC-3 562362.85 4206855.73 7.44 1.50 7.44 PERIOD 0.00188 ug/m^3 PSC-4 562343.02 4206842.45 5.25 1.50 32.90 PERIOD 0.00233 ug/m^3 PSC-5 562310.01 4206899.35 5.80 1.50 6.76 PERIOD 0.00243 ug/m^3 PSC-6 562314.09 4206901.39 6.34 1.50 6.76 PERIOD 0.00258 ug/m^3 PSC-7 562318.18 4206903.43 6.82 1.50 6.82 PERIOD 0.00276 ug/m^3 PSC-8 562322.26 4206905.48 7.00 1.50 7.00 PERIOD 0.00295 ug/m^3 PSC-9 562326.34 4206907.52 7.16 1.50 7.16 PERIOD 0.00302 ug/m^3 PSC-10 562332.91 4206905.42 7.36 1.50 7.36 PERIOD 0.00292 ug/m^3 PSC-11 562335.41 4206901.28 7.44 1.50 7.44 PERIOD 0.00284 ug/m^3 PSC-12 562337.90 4206897.14 7.45 1.50 7.45 PERIOD 0.00276 ug/m^3 PSC-13 562340.40 4206893.00 7.49 1.50 7.49 PERIOD 0.00268 ug/m^3 PSC-14 562342.89 4206888.86 7.55 1.50 7.55 PERIOD 0.00260 ug/m^3 PSC-15 562345.39 4206884.72 7.57 1.50 7.57 PERIOD 0.00254 ug/m^3 PSC-16 562347.88 4206880.58 7.58 1.50 7.58 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 17 of 21
Appendix
A Page 152
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00247 ug/m^3 PSC-17 562350.38 4206876.43 7.59 1.50 7.59 PERIOD 0.00241 ug/m^3 PSC-18 562352.87 4206872.29 7.60 1.50 7.60 PERIOD 0.00236 ug/m^3 PSC-19 562355.37 4206868.15 7.56 1.50 7.56 PERIOD 0.00231 ug/m^3 PSC-20 562357.86 4206864.01 7.47 1.50 7.47 PERIOD 0.00226 ug/m^3 PSC-21 562360.36 4206859.87 7.43 1.50 7.43 PERIOD 0.00213 ug/m^3 PSC-22 562358.88 4206853.07 7.09 1.50 7.09 PERIOD 0.00206 ug/m^3 PSC-23 562354.92 4206850.42 6.71 1.50 6.71 PERIOD 0.00200 ug/m^3 PSC-24 562350.95 4206847.76 6.27 1.50 6.27 PERIOD 0.00195 ug/m^3 PSC-25 562346.99 4206845.11 5.79 1.50 5.79 PERIOD 0.00190 ug/m^3 PSC-26 562340.37 4206846.37 5.38 1.50 5.38 PERIOD 0.00192 ug/m^3 PSC-27 562337.72 4206850.29 5.48 1.50 5.48 PERIOD 0.00194 ug/m^3 PSC-28 562335.07 4206854.21 5.53 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00197 ug/m^3 PSC-29 562332.42 4206858.12 5.53 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00199 ug/m^3 PSC-30 562329.77 4206862.04 5.50 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00202 ug/m^3 PSC-31 562327.12 4206865.96 5.41 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00205 ug/m^3 PSC-32 562324.48 4206869.88 5.29 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00207 ug/m^3 PSC-33 562321.83 4206873.80 5.25 1.50 5.25 PERIOD 0.00209 ug/m^3 PSC-34 562319.18 4206877.72 5.26 1.50 5.26 PERIOD 0.00210 ug/m^3 PSC-35 562316.53 4206881.64 5.34 1.50 5.34 PERIOD 0.00212 ug/m^3 PSC-36 562313.88 4206885.55 5.40 1.50 5.40 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 18 of 21
Appendix
A Page 153
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00213 ug/m^3 PSC-37 562311.23 4206889.47 5.41 1.50 6.76 PERIOD 0.00215 ug/m^3 PSC-38 562308.58 4206893.39 5.36 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-1 562303.47 4206592.57 9.32 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00054 ug/m^3 SJC-2 562344.28 4206615.31 8.59 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00048 ug/m^3 SJC-3 562373.32 4206568.00 8.40 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 SJC-4 562334.13 4206544.65 9.25 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 SJC-5 562307.55 4206594.84 9.25 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 SJC-6 562311.63 4206597.12 9.18 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00045 ug/m^3 SJC-7 562315.71 4206599.39 9.11 1.50 38.28 PERIOD 0.00047 ug/m^3 SJC-8 562319.79 4206601.67 9.04 1.50 9.04 PERIOD 0.00048 ug/m^3 SJC-9 562323.88 4206603.94 8.96 1.50 8.96 PERIOD 0.00049 ug/m^3 SJC-10 562327.96 4206606.21 8.88 1.50 8.88 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 SJC-11 562332.04 4206608.49 8.80 1.50 37.69 PERIOD 0.00051 ug/m^3 SJC-12 562336.12 4206610.76 8.73 1.50 37.69 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 SJC-13 562340.20 4206613.04 8.66 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00053 ug/m^3 SJC-14 562346.70 4206611.37 8.59 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00053 ug/m^3 SJC-15 562349.12 4206607.43 8.59 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 SJC-16 562351.54 4206603.48 8.58 1.50 39.99 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 SJC-17 562353.96 4206599.54 8.58 1.50 39.99 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 SJC-18 562356.38 4206595.60 8.57 1.50 39.99 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 19 of 21
Appendix
A Page 154
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00051 ug/m^3 SJC-19 562358.80 4206591.66 8.56 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00051 ug/m^3 SJC-20 562361.22 4206587.71 8.54 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 SJC-21 562363.64 4206583.77 8.52 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 SJC-22 562366.06 4206579.83 8.49 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00049 ug/m^3 SJC-23 562368.48 4206575.89 8.46 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00049 ug/m^3 SJC-24 562370.90 4206571.94 8.43 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00048 ug/m^3 SJC-25 562369.40 4206565.67 8.49 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00047 ug/m^3 SJC-26 562365.48 4206563.33 8.58 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00046 ug/m^3 SJC-27 562361.56 4206561.00 8.67 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00045 ug/m^3 SJC-28 562357.64 4206558.66 8.76 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 SJC-29 562353.73 4206556.33 8.84 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 SJC-30 562349.81 4206553.99 8.93 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 SJC-31 562345.89 4206551.66 9.01 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-32 562341.97 4206549.32 9.09 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-33 562338.05 4206546.99 9.17 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 SJC-34 562331.57 4206548.64 9.28 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-35 562329.02 4206552.64 9.31 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-36 562326.46 4206556.63 9.34 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-37 562323.91 4206560.62 9.36 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-38 562321.36 4206564.62 9.38 1.50 93.89 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 20 of 21
Appendix
A Page 155
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectSite-Wide Activity and Phase 1 Development PM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL
Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-39 562318.80 4206568.61 9.38 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-40 562316.25 4206572.60 9.38 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-41 562313.69 4206576.60 9.37 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-42 562311.14 4206580.59 9.36 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-43 562308.58 4206584.58 9.35 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-44 562306.03 4206588.58 9.34 1.50 82.06 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc RS - 21 of 21
Appendix
A Page 156
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Re
Appendix A
sidential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Polygon Area Sources
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: PROJECTSITE (Project Site - Site-wide Grading and Site Prep) X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
2.68 3.33 2.07E-8 30 562307.78 4207095.31
2.07E-8 562401.56 4207132.772.07E-8 562453.03 4207129.992.07E-8 562505.54 4207055.792.07E-8 562517.03 4207028.392.07E-8 562508.70 4207024.882.07E-8 562519.86 4206999.032.07E-8 562499.01 4206995.312.07E-8 562506.66 4206980.222.07E-8 562535.68 4206985.462.07E-8 562541.19 4206973.552.07E-8 562503.86 4206966.912.07E-8 562470.86 4206962.002.07E-8 562439.86 4206958.312.07E-8 562438.77 4206965.912.07E-8 562414.78 4206963.742.07E-8 562400.21 4206962.532.07E-8 562382.09 4206961.482.07E-8 562365.63 4206960.702.07E-8 562350.20 4206960.142.07E-8 562331.99 4206959.792.07E-8 562315.36 4206959.792.07E-8 562301.59 4206959.852.07E-8 562301.64 4206961.662.07E-8 562297.63 4206961.822.07E-8 562297.79 4206967.982.07E-8 562297.77 4206972.162.07E-8 562297.72 4206978.092.07E-8 562297.24 4206985.482.07E-8 562318.71 4207052.95 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 2 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Re
Appendix A
sidential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: PROJECTSITE (Project Site - Site-wide Grading and Site Prep) X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 3 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Re
Appendix A
sidential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: PH.2.TO.5 (Phases 2 through 5 Construction after intro of new receptors) X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
7.25 3.33 0.00E+0 26 562415.03 4207004.73
0.00E+0 562407.75 4207018.640.00E+0 562407.91 4207048.340.00E+0 562449.62 4207052.400.00E+0 562475.22 4207030.410.00E+0 562480.63 4207027.820.00E+0 562509.69 4207039.220.00E+0 562503.69 4207053.030.00E+0 562490.40 4207071.680.00E+0 562464.02 4207055.260.00E+0 562449.38 4207076.280.00E+0 562473.94 4207094.890.00E+0 562450.29 4207128.520.00E+0 562403.09 4207130.910.00E+0 562366.48 4207116.770.00E+0 562378.74 4207084.550.00E+0 562354.85 4207073.660.00E+0 562349.17 4207064.280.00E+0 562311.06 4207083.970.00E+0 562319.40 4207051.980.00E+0 562297.77 4206985.640.00E+0 562298.03 4206961.260.00E+0 562302.32 4206961.220.00E+0 562302.19 4206959.680.00E+0 562354.11 4206960.330.00E+0 562418.58 4206963.43 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 4 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Re
Appendix A
sidential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line Volume Sources
Source Type: LINE VOLUMESource: SKELLYRD (Skelly Road - Off-Site Emissions) Release Height
[m]
Base Elevation
[m]
Y Coordinate for points
[m]
X Coordinate for Points
[m]
Length of Side
[m]
Emission Rate
[g/ s]
Building Height
[m]
12.00 4.66E-7 562513.83 4207036.73 14.75 3.12
562561.10 4207060.25 13.15 3.12562596.00 4207075.54 19.76 3.12562619.04 4207096.26 24.67 3.12562634.60 4207128.45 24.74 3.12562635.36 4207150.41 24.65 3.12562629.93 4207172.50 22.40 3.12562606.40 4207228.76 24.45 3.12562603.93 4207236.59 24.54 3.12562601.14 4207256.12 23.24 3.12562600.97 4207279.44 22.11 3.12562605.24 4207329.80 14.50 3.12 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 5 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Re
Appendix A
sidential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Volume Sources Generated from Line Sources
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
SKELLYRD L0000001 562519.20 4207039.40 14.38 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8 L0000002 562529.94 4207044.75 13.99 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000003 562540.69 4207050.09 13.52 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000004 562551.43 4207055.44 13.04 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000005 562562.20 4207060.73 13.44 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000006 562573.19 4207065.55 16.14 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000007 562584.18 4207070.36 18.68 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000008 562595.17 4207075.18 21.29 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000009 562604.25 4207082.96 23.30 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000010 562613.17 4207090.99 24.36 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8 L0000011 562620.83 4207099.96 24.34 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8 L0000012 562626.05 4207110.77 24.17 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000013 562631.28 4207121.57 24.46 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000014 562634.75 4207132.80 24.88 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000015 562635.17 4207144.80 24.90 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000016 562633.84 4207156.61 25.09 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000017 562630.98 4207168.26 25.28 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000018 562626.99 4207179.55 25.27 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000019 562622.36 4207190.62 24.90 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000020 562617.73 4207201.69 24.54 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000021 562613.10 4207212.76 24.24 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000022 562608.46 4207223.83 24.08 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000023 562604.40 4207235.11 24.05 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000024 562602.46 4207246.93 23.88 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 6 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Re
Appendix A
sidential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
SKELLYRD L0000025 562601.12 4207258.84 23.18 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8 L0000026 562601.04 4207270.83 22.59 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000027 562601.26 4207282.82 20.26 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000028 562602.27 4207294.78 17.73 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000029 562603.29 4207306.74 15.73 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8L0000030 562604.30 4207318.69 15.10 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 1.55E-8 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 7 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Re
Appendix A
sidential_Phase 1\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phase 1.isc
Control Pathway
AERMOD
Flat & Elevated Terrain
No Stack-Tip Downwash (NOSTD)
Run in Screening Mode
Conversion of NOx to NO2 (OLM or PVMRM)
No Checks for Non-Sequential Met Data
Fast All Sources (FASTALL)
Fast Area Sources (FASTAREA)
Optimized Area Source Plume Depletion
Gas Deposition
BETA Options:
Capped and Horizontal Stack Releases
Adjusted Friction Velocity (u*) in AERMET (ADJ_U*)
Low Wind Options
SCIM (Sampled Chronological Input Model)
Ignore Urban Night / Daytime Transition (NOURBTRAN)
Total Deposition (Dry & Wet)
Dry Deposition
Wet Deposition
Output Type
Concentration
Regulatory Default Non-Default Options
Dispersion Options
21180006 Skelly Residential Project
Phases 2 thru 5 Development
Titles
Dispersion Options
Population:
Name (Optional):
Roughness Length:
Plume Depletion
Dry Removal
Wet Removal
Output Warnings
No Output Warnings
Non-fatal Warnings for Non-sequential Met Data
Dispersion Coefficient
Urban
Pollutant / Averaging Time / Terrain Options
TG: Meters
RE: Meters
1 2 3 4 6 8 12 24 Flat Elevated SO: Meters
Hours Terrain Height Options
Averaging Time Options
Yes No
Pollutant Type Exponential Decay
Month Period Annual
PM2.5
Flagpole Receptors
Yes No
Default Height = 1.50 m
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software CO - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 164
Control Pathway
AERMOD
Optional Files
Re-Start File Init File Multi-Year Analyses Event Input File Error Listing File Detailed Error Listing File
Filename: 21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.err AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software CO - 2 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 165
AERMOD View - Lakes Environmental Software C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc SCALE:
0.5 km
1:23,505
PROJECT NO.:
DATE:
4/12/2022
MODELER:
COMPANY NAME:
PROJECT TITLE: COMMENTS:
21180006 Skelly Residential Project
Phases 2 thru 5 Development
SOURCES:
RECEPTORS:
2299
OUTPUT TYPE:
Concentration
MAX:
7.8E-02 ug/m^3
Appendix A Page 166
Meteorology Pathway
AERMOD
Met Input Data
Surface Met Data
Profile Met Data
C:\Users\lpark\OneDrive - ADEC Solutions USA, Inc\Desktop\01. Project Files\2118.0006 Skelly Rd Residenti Default AERMET format
Filename:
Format Type:
Filename:
Format Type:
C:\Users\lpark\OneDrive - ADEC Solutions USA, Inc\Desktop\01. Project Files\2118.0006 Skelly Rd Residenti Potential Temperature Profile
Base Elevation above MSL (for Primary Met Tower): 4.30 [m] Wind Direction
Rotation Adjustment [deg]:
Meteorological Station Data
Upper Air
Station No. Year Station Name
Surface
Stations X Coordinate [m] Y Coordinate [m]
2009 Napa County Airport
2009 OAKLAND/WSO AP
Default AERMET format
Wind Speed
Wind Speeds are Vector Mean (Not Scalar Means)
Data Period
Start Date: 1/1/2009 Start Hour: 1 End Date: 1/2/2014 End Hour: 24 Data Period to Process
10.8 8.23
5.14 3.09
1.54 No Upper Bound
Wind Speed [m/s] Stability Category Wind Speed [m/s]
F
E
D
C
B
A
Stability Category
Wind Speed Categories
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software ME - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 167
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
Receptor Networks
Note: Terrain Elavations and Flagpole Heights for Network Grids are in Page RE2 - 1 (If applicable) Generated Discrete Receptors for Multi-Tier (Risk) Grid and Receptor Locations for Fenceline Grid are in Page RE3 - 1 (If applicable) Discrete Receptors
Discrete Cartesian Receptors
X-Coordinate [m] Y-Coordinate [m] Terrain Elevations
Flagpole Heights [m]
(Optional)
Record
Number
Group Name
(Optional)
1 562293.81 4207045.66 Res 2.33 1.50
2 562305.03 4207059.24 Res 2.40 1.50
3 562279.13 4207106.06 Res 2.44 1.50
4 562296.00 4207111.74 Res 2.39 1.50
5 562304.79 4207117.42 Res 2.80 1.50
6 562322.17 4207119.32 Res 3.52 1.50
7 562333.83 4207123.38 Res 3.89 1.50
8 562346.05 4207130.57 Res 4.17 1.50
9 562359.62 4207135.24 Res 4.36 1.50
10 562372.97 4207141.03 Res 4.53 1.50
11 562386.19 4207148.75 Res 4.70 1.50
12 562400.36 4207152.13 Res 4.82 1.50
13 562410.20 4207156.25 Res 4.91 1.50
14 562425.95 4207163.76 Res 5.16 1.50
15 562439.64 4207168.84 Res 5.52 1.50
16 562448.45 4207177.65 Res 6.40 1.50
17 562457.39 4207154.50 Res 5.95 1.50
18 562470.86 4207142.06 Res 6.55 1.50
19 562483.62 4207129.91 Res 7.26 1.50
20 562494.77 4207113.09 Res 8.05 1.50
21 562502.01 4207095.70 Res 9.33 1.50
22 562513.36 4207078.68 Res 10.75 1.50
23 562522.88 4207065.10 Res 12.32 1.50
24 562538.46 4207021.31 Res 15.95 1.50
25 562556.90 4207027.02 Res 17.04 1.50
26 562572.28 4207035.22 Res 17.67 1.50
27 562588.97 4207044.15 Res 20.29 1.50
28 562607.12 4207051.62 Res 24.74 1.50
29 562625.42 4207064.35 Res 26.31 1.50
30 562637.06 4207077.67 Res 26.83 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 168
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
31 562649.81 4207092.83 Res 27.36 1.50
32 562656.70 4207112.98 Res 27.08 1.50
33 562662.56 4207131.75 Res 27.73 1.50
34 562660.84 4207155.40 Res 28.13 1.50
35 562656.88 4207175.55 Res 28.69 1.50
36 562647.75 4207194.67 Res 28.39 1.50
37 562640.08 4207211.01 Res 27.82 1.50
38 562633.98 4207228.74 Res 27.25 1.50
39 562625.49 4207246.31 Res 26.26 1.50
40 562566.88 4207085.38 Res 14.28 1.50
41 562557.55 4207100.07 Res 12.93 1.50
42 562548.46 4207113.39 Res 12.76 1.50
43 562533.15 4207129.32 Res 12.53 1.50
44 562592.52 4207103.18 Res 19.23 1.50
45 562607.46 4207116.87 Res 20.81 1.50
46 562611.64 4207140.35 Res 21.80 1.50
47 562582.97 4207146.17 Res 18.36 1.50
48 562609.42 4207160.03 Res 22.13 1.50
49 562564.52 4207164.03 Res 16.81 1.50
50 562559.40 4207183.06 Res 16.77 1.50
51 562572.72 4207206.93 Res 18.65 1.50
52 562591.23 4207215.76 Res 21.15 1.50
53 562580.09 4207241.29 Res 21.94 1.50
54 562576.40 4207260.81 Res 21.15 1.50
55 562577.58 4207278.68 Res 19.68 1.50
56 562579.59 4207299.32 Res 15.88 1.50
57 562582.23 4207316.96 Res 14.03 1.50
58 562524.48 4207146.24 Res 12.34 1.50
59 562512.14 4207161.68 Res 11.32 1.50
60 562502.60 4207175.99 Res 10.94 1.50
61 562490.25 4207188.62 Res 11.09 1.50
62 562479.59 4207204.05 Res 11.34 1.50
63 562465.56 4207221.02 Res 10.64 1.50
64 562425.96 4207214.34 Res 5.86 1.50
65 562412.61 4207209.09 Res 5.16 1.50
66 562402.35 4207205.04 Res 4.97 1.50
67 562389.23 4207197.88 Res 4.73 1.50
68 562357.51 4207185.00 Res 4.28 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 2 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 169
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
69 562347.73 4207180.94 Res 4.13 1.50
70 562333.42 4207174.50 Res 3.85 1.50
71 562319.56 4207165.77 Res 3.47 1.50
72 562307.80 4207162.73 Res 3.03 1.50
73 562295.23 4207156.45 Res 2.48 1.50
74 562281.85 4207150.97 Res 2.35 1.50
75 562269.68 4207148.13 Res 2.43 1.50
76 562255.69 4207142.05 Res 2.58 1.50
77 562230.12 4206977.87 Res 4.33 1.50
78 562241.11 4206995.30 Res 4.08 1.50
79 562233.34 4207015.08 Res 4.02 1.50
80 562216.64 4207027.09 Res 4.14 1.50
81 562208.44 4207038.37 Res 4.13 1.50
82 562211.07 4206975.81 Res 4.60 1.50
83 562444.86 4206878.58 Res 10.34 1.50
84 562434.77 4206866.25 Res 9.91 1.50
85 562423.69 4206856.66 Res 9.42 1.50
86 562419.10 4206817.49 Res 8.63 1.50
87 562404.28 4206836.97 Res 8.51 1.50
88 562395.83 4206830.42 Res 8.11 1.50
89 562387.09 4206788.03 Res 6.39 1.50
90 562371.27 4206807.34 Res 5.70 1.50
91 562366.91 4206816.18 Res 5.86 1.50
92 562559.49 4206885.66 Res 16.49 1.50
93 562548.04 4206874.69 Res 14.22 1.50
94 562626.84 4206905.90 Res 29.57 1.50
95 562663.83 4206894.92 Res 32.30 1.50
96 562567.19 4206858.13 Res 16.23 1.50
97 562521.71 4206853.33 Res 12.07 1.50
98 562510.24 4206845.68 Res 11.70 1.50
99 562103.04 4206790.15 School 10.69 1.50
100 562122.03 4206757.18 School 6.68 1.50
101 562190.19 4206791.82 School 6.10 1.50
102 562183.24 4206803.74 School 6.14 1.50
103 562279.18 4206860.34 School 4.74 1.50
104 562263.31 4206884.83 School 4.63 1.50
105 562230.89 4206906.39 School 4.94 1.50
106 562192.97 4206912.57 School 5.30 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 3 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 170
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
107 562157.64 4206906.27 School 5.52 1.50
108 562134.18 4206893.22 School 6.06 1.50
109 562174.91 4206820.05 School 6.14 1.50
110 562105.41 4206786.03 School 9.69 1.50
111 562107.79 4206781.91 School 8.83 1.50
112 562110.16 4206777.79 School 8.11 1.50
113 562112.54 4206773.67 School 7.60 1.50
114 562114.91 4206769.54 School 7.28 1.50
115 562117.28 4206765.42 School 7.03 1.50
116 562119.66 4206761.30 School 6.82 1.50
117 562126.29 4206759.35 School 6.60 1.50
118 562130.55 4206761.51 School 6.57 1.50
119 562134.81 4206763.68 School 6.54 1.50
120 562139.07 4206765.84 School 6.51 1.50
121 562143.33 4206768.01 School 6.48 1.50
122 562147.59 4206770.17 School 6.44 1.50
123 562151.85 4206772.34 School 6.40 1.50
124 562156.11 4206774.50 School 6.36 1.50
125 562160.37 4206776.67 School 6.32 1.50
126 562164.63 4206778.83 School 6.28 1.50
127 562168.89 4206781.00 School 6.23 1.50
128 562173.15 4206783.16 School 6.19 1.50
129 562177.41 4206785.33 School 6.17 1.50
130 562181.67 4206787.49 School 6.15 1.50
131 562185.93 4206789.66 School 6.12 1.50
132 562187.87 4206795.79 School 6.11 1.50
133 562185.56 4206799.77 School 6.12 1.50
134 562187.41 4206806.20 School 6.11 1.50
135 562191.58 4206808.66 School 6.07 1.50
136 562195.75 4206811.12 School 6.02 1.50
137 562199.93 4206813.58 School 5.98 1.50
138 562204.10 4206816.04 School 5.95 1.50
139 562208.27 4206818.51 School 5.91 1.50
140 562212.44 4206820.97 School 5.88 1.50
141 562216.61 4206823.43 School 5.85 1.50
142 562220.78 4206825.89 School 5.83 1.50
143 562224.95 4206828.35 School 5.79 1.50
144 562229.12 4206830.81 School 5.76 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 4 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 171
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
145 562233.30 4206833.27 School 5.73 1.50
146 562237.47 4206835.73 School 5.70 1.50
147 562241.64 4206838.19 School 5.67 1.50
148 562245.81 4206840.65 School 5.62 1.50
149 562249.98 4206843.11 School 5.57 1.50
150 562254.15 4206845.58 School 5.51 1.50
151 562258.32 4206848.04 School 5.43 1.50
152 562262.49 4206850.50 School 5.35 1.50
153 562266.67 4206852.96 School 5.25 1.50
154 562270.84 4206855.42 School 5.13 1.50
155 562275.01 4206857.88 School 4.95 1.50
156 562276.54 4206864.42 School 4.72 1.50
157 562273.89 4206868.50 School 4.72 1.50
158 562271.25 4206872.59 School 4.73 1.50
159 562268.60 4206876.67 School 4.71 1.50
160 562265.96 4206880.75 School 4.67 1.50
161 562259.26 4206887.53 School 4.66 1.50
162 562255.21 4206890.22 School 4.71 1.50
163 562251.15 4206892.92 School 4.76 1.50
164 562247.10 4206895.61 School 4.81 1.50
165 562243.05 4206898.31 School 4.84 1.50
166 562239.00 4206901.00 School 4.86 1.50
167 562234.94 4206903.70 School 4.90 1.50
168 562226.15 4206907.16 School 5.02 1.50
169 562221.41 4206907.94 School 5.10 1.50
170 562216.67 4206908.71 School 5.14 1.50
171 562211.93 4206909.48 School 5.18 1.50
172 562207.19 4206910.25 School 5.21 1.50
173 562202.45 4206911.03 School 5.24 1.50
174 562197.71 4206911.80 School 5.27 1.50
175 562188.55 4206911.78 School 5.32 1.50
176 562184.14 4206911.00 School 5.34 1.50
177 562179.72 4206910.21 School 5.36 1.50
178 562175.31 4206909.42 School 5.38 1.50
179 562170.89 4206908.63 School 5.41 1.50
180 562166.47 4206907.85 School 5.44 1.50
181 562162.06 4206907.06 School 5.48 1.50
182 562153.73 4206904.10 School 5.57 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 5 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 172
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
183 562149.82 4206901.92 School 5.63 1.50
184 562145.91 4206899.75 School 5.70 1.50
185 562142.00 4206897.57 School 5.82 1.50
186 562138.09 4206895.40 School 5.94 1.50
187 562136.58 4206888.92 School 6.07 1.50
188 562138.97 4206884.61 School 6.08 1.50
189 562141.37 4206880.31 School 6.10 1.50
190 562143.76 4206876.00 School 6.12 1.50
191 562146.16 4206871.70 School 6.14 1.50
192 562148.56 4206867.40 School 6.16 1.50
193 562150.95 4206863.09 School 6.17 1.50
194 562153.35 4206858.79 School 6.18 1.50
195 562155.74 4206854.48 School 6.19 1.50
196 562158.14 4206850.18 School 6.20 1.50
197 562160.53 4206845.88 School 6.20 1.50
198 562162.93 4206841.57 School 6.21 1.50
199 562165.33 4206837.27 School 6.21 1.50
200 562167.72 4206832.96 School 6.19 1.50
201 562170.12 4206828.66 School 6.16 1.50
202 562172.51 4206824.35 School 6.14 1.50
203 562170.42 4206818.18 School 6.19 1.50
204 562165.93 4206816.31 School 6.27 1.50
205 562161.43 4206814.44 School 6.34 1.50
206 562156.94 4206812.58 School 6.41 1.50
207 562152.45 4206810.71 School 6.48 1.50
208 562147.96 4206808.84 School 6.55 1.50
209 562143.47 4206806.97 School 6.59 1.50
210 562138.98 4206805.10 School 6.62 1.50
211 562134.48 4206803.23 School 6.65 1.50
212 562129.99 4206801.36 School 6.68 1.50
213 562125.50 4206799.49 School 6.71 1.50
214 562121.01 4206797.63 School 7.34 1.50
215 562116.52 4206795.76 School 8.35 1.50
216 562112.02 4206793.89 School 9.25 1.50
217 562107.53 4206792.02 School 10.03 1.50
218 562242.15 4207189.12 Daycare 2.45 1.50
219 562255.39 4207158.50 Daycare 2.50 1.50
220 562235.26 4207149.71 Daycare 2.74 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 6 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 173
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
221 562227.31 4207163.59 Daycare 2.73 1.50
222 562225.09 4207175.24 Daycare 2.68 1.50
223 562229.54 4207184.67 Daycare 2.58 1.50
224 562244.04 4207184.75 Daycare 2.46 1.50
225 562245.93 4207180.37 Daycare 2.46 1.50
226 562247.82 4207176.00 Daycare 2.47 1.50
227 562249.72 4207171.62 Daycare 2.48 1.50
228 562251.61 4207167.25 Daycare 2.49 1.50
229 562253.50 4207162.87 Daycare 2.50 1.50
230 562251.36 4207156.74 Daycare 2.55 1.50
231 562247.34 4207154.98 Daycare 2.59 1.50
232 562243.31 4207153.23 Daycare 2.64 1.50
233 562239.29 4207151.47 Daycare 2.69 1.50
234 562233.27 4207153.18 Daycare 2.74 1.50
235 562231.29 4207156.65 Daycare 2.74 1.50
236 562229.30 4207160.12 Daycare 2.73 1.50
237 562226.57 4207167.47 Daycare 2.71 1.50
238 562225.83 4207171.36 Daycare 2.70 1.50
239 562226.57 4207178.38 Daycare 2.64 1.50
240 562228.06 4207181.53 Daycare 2.61 1.50
241 562233.74 4207186.15 Daycare 2.54 1.50
242 562237.95 4207187.64 Daycare 2.49 1.50
243 562185.94 4206803.18 School 6.12 1.50
244 562213.54 4206752.30 School 6.24 1.50
245 562243.21 4206767.30 School 6.11 1.50
246 562256.49 4206746.43 School 6.42 1.50
247 562333.43 4206801.29 School 4.81 1.50
248 562280.82 4206860.28 School 4.69 1.50
249 562188.24 4206798.94 School 6.11 1.50
250 562190.54 4206794.70 School 6.10 1.50
251 562192.84 4206790.46 School 6.09 1.50
252 562195.14 4206786.22 School 6.08 1.50
253 562197.44 4206781.98 School 6.07 1.50
254 562199.74 4206777.74 School 6.08 1.50
255 562202.04 4206773.50 School 6.10 1.50
256 562204.34 4206769.26 School 6.13 1.50
257 562206.64 4206765.02 School 6.16 1.50
258 562208.94 4206760.78 School 6.19 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 7 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 174
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
259 562211.24 4206756.54 School 6.21 1.50
260 562217.78 4206754.44 School 6.23 1.50
261 562222.02 4206756.59 School 6.22 1.50
262 562226.26 4206758.73 School 6.20 1.50
263 562230.49 4206760.87 School 6.19 1.50
264 562234.73 4206763.01 School 6.16 1.50
265 562238.97 4206765.16 School 6.14 1.50
266 562245.87 4206763.13 School 6.16 1.50
267 562248.52 4206758.95 School 6.22 1.50
268 562251.18 4206754.78 School 6.28 1.50
269 562253.83 4206750.60 School 6.35 1.50
270 562260.54 4206749.32 School 6.39 1.50
271 562264.59 4206752.21 School 6.36 1.50
272 562268.64 4206755.09 School 6.33 1.50
273 562272.69 4206757.98 School 6.30 1.50
274 562276.74 4206760.87 School 6.27 1.50
275 562280.79 4206763.75 School 6.24 1.50
276 562284.84 4206766.64 School 6.20 1.50
277 562288.89 4206769.53 School 6.17 1.50
278 562292.94 4206772.42 School 6.14 1.50
279 562296.98 4206775.30 School 6.10 1.50
280 562301.03 4206778.19 School 6.04 1.50
281 562305.08 4206781.08 School 5.98 1.50
282 562309.13 4206783.97 School 5.92 1.50
283 562313.18 4206786.85 School 5.85 1.50
284 562317.23 4206789.74 School 5.78 1.50
285 562321.28 4206792.63 School 5.62 1.50
286 562325.33 4206795.52 School 5.39 1.50
287 562329.38 4206798.40 School 5.12 1.50
288 562330.14 4206804.98 School 4.82 1.50
289 562326.85 4206808.66 School 4.87 1.50
290 562323.57 4206812.35 School 4.93 1.50
291 562320.28 4206816.04 School 4.92 1.50
292 562316.99 4206819.72 School 4.83 1.50
293 562313.70 4206823.41 School 4.76 1.50
294 562310.41 4206827.10 School 4.73 1.50
295 562307.13 4206830.79 School 4.74 1.50
296 562303.84 4206834.47 School 4.79 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 8 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 175
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
297 562300.55 4206838.16 School 4.87 1.50
298 562297.26 4206841.85 School 4.93 1.50
299 562293.97 4206845.53 School 4.92 1.50
300 562290.68 4206849.22 School 4.83 1.50
301 562287.40 4206852.91 School 4.76 1.50
302 562284.11 4206856.59 School 4.71 1.50
303 562276.69 4206857.80 School 4.90 1.50
304 562272.57 4206855.32 School 5.08 1.50
305 562268.44 4206852.83 School 5.23 1.50
306 562264.32 4206850.35 School 5.33 1.50
307 562260.19 4206847.87 School 5.41 1.50
308 562256.07 4206845.38 School 5.49 1.50
309 562251.94 4206842.90 School 5.56 1.50
310 562247.82 4206840.42 School 5.61 1.50
311 562243.69 4206837.94 School 5.66 1.50
312 562239.57 4206835.45 School 5.69 1.50
313 562235.44 4206832.97 School 5.72 1.50
314 562231.32 4206830.49 School 5.75 1.50
315 562227.19 4206828.01 School 5.78 1.50
316 562223.07 4206825.52 School 5.82 1.50
317 562218.94 4206823.04 School 5.85 1.50
318 562214.82 4206820.56 School 5.87 1.50
319 562210.69 4206818.08 School 5.91 1.50
320 562206.57 4206815.59 School 5.94 1.50
321 562202.44 4206813.11 School 5.97 1.50
322 562198.32 4206810.63 School 6.01 1.50
323 562194.19 4206808.15 School 6.05 1.50
324 562190.07 4206805.66 School 6.09 1.50
325 562305.93 4206897.31 5.25 1.50
326 562330.42 4206909.56 7.31 1.50
327 562362.85 4206855.73 7.44 1.50
328 562343.02 4206842.45 5.25 1.50
329 562310.01 4206899.35 5.80 1.50
330 562314.09 4206901.39 6.34 1.50
331 562318.18 4206903.44 6.82 1.50
332 562322.26 4206905.48 7.00 1.50
333 562326.34 4206907.52 7.16 1.50
334 562332.91 4206905.42 7.36 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 9 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 176
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
335 562335.41 4206901.28 7.44 1.50
336 562337.90 4206897.14 7.45 1.50
337 562340.40 4206893.00 7.49 1.50
338 562342.89 4206888.86 7.55 1.50
339 562345.39 4206884.72 7.57 1.50
340 562347.88 4206880.58 7.58 1.50
341 562350.38 4206876.43 7.59 1.50
342 562352.87 4206872.29 7.60 1.50
343 562355.37 4206868.15 7.56 1.50
344 562357.86 4206864.01 7.47 1.50
345 562360.36 4206859.87 7.43 1.50
346 562358.88 4206853.07 7.09 1.50
347 562354.92 4206850.42 6.71 1.50
348 562350.95 4206847.76 6.27 1.50
349 562346.99 4206845.11 5.79 1.50
350 562340.37 4206846.37 5.38 1.50
351 562337.72 4206850.29 5.48 1.50
352 562335.07 4206854.21 5.53 1.50
353 562332.42 4206858.12 5.53 1.50
354 562329.77 4206862.04 5.50 1.50
355 562327.12 4206865.96 5.41 1.50
356 562324.48 4206869.88 5.29 1.50
357 562321.83 4206873.80 5.25 1.50
358 562319.18 4206877.72 5.26 1.50
359 562316.53 4206881.64 5.34 1.50
360 562313.88 4206885.55 5.40 1.50
361 562311.23 4206889.47 5.41 1.50
362 562308.58 4206893.39 5.36 1.50
363 562303.47 4206592.57 9.32 1.50
364 562344.28 4206615.31 8.59 1.50
365 562373.32 4206568.00 8.40 1.50
366 562334.13 4206544.65 9.25 1.50
367 562307.55 4206594.84 9.25 1.50
368 562311.63 4206597.12 9.18 1.50
369 562315.71 4206599.39 9.11 1.50
370 562319.79 4206601.67 9.04 1.50
371 562323.88 4206603.94 8.96 1.50
372 562327.96 4206606.21 8.88 1.50
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 10 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 177
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
373 562332.04 4206608.49 8.80 1.50
374 562336.12 4206610.76 8.73 1.50
375 562340.20 4206613.04 8.66 1.50
376 562346.70 4206611.37 8.59 1.50
377 562349.12 4206607.43 8.59 1.50
378 562351.54 4206603.48 8.58 1.50
379 562353.96 4206599.54 8.58 1.50
380 562356.38 4206595.60 8.57 1.50
381 562358.80 4206591.66 8.56 1.50
382 562361.22 4206587.71 8.54 1.50
383 562363.64 4206583.77 8.52 1.50
384 562366.06 4206579.83 8.49 1.50
385 562368.48 4206575.89 8.46 1.50
386 562370.90 4206571.94 8.43 1.50
387 562369.40 4206565.67 8.49 1.50
388 562365.48 4206563.33 8.58 1.50
389 562361.56 4206561.00 8.67 1.50
390 562357.64 4206558.66 8.76 1.50
391 562353.73 4206556.33 8.84 1.50
392 562349.81 4206553.99 8.93 1.50
393 562345.89 4206551.66 9.01 1.50
394 562341.97 4206549.32 9.09 1.50
395 562338.05 4206546.99 9.17 1.50
396 562331.58 4206548.64 9.28 1.50
397 562329.02 4206552.64 9.31 1.50
398 562326.47 4206556.63 9.34 1.50
399 562323.91 4206560.62 9.36 1.50
400 562321.36 4206564.62 9.38 1.50
401 562318.80 4206568.61 9.38 1.50
402 562316.25 4206572.60 9.38 1.50
403 562313.69 4206576.60 9.37 1.50
404 562311.14 4206580.59 9.36 1.50
405 562308.58 4206584.58 9.35 1.50
406 562306.03 4206588.58 9.34 1.50
407 562414.89 4207033.80 7.12
408 562430.23 4207034.32 8.59
409 562443.53 4207035.00 10.01
410 562422.56 4206993.06 8.02
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 11 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 178
Receptor Pathway
AERMOD
411 562434.67 4206992.55 9.37
412 562447.11 4206995.44 10.84
413 562459.90 4206995.96 12.39
414 562472.34 4206998.68 13.15
Plant Boundary Receptors
Receptor Groups
Group ID Group Description
Record
Number
1 FENCEPRI Cartesian plant boundary Primary Receptors
2 FENCEINT Cartesian plant boundary Intermediate Receptors 3 Res
4 School
5 Daycare
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software RE1 - 12 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc Appendix A Page 179
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.01142 ug/m^3 R-1 562293.81 4207045.66 2.33 1.50 2.33 PERIOD 0.01397 ug/m^3 R-2 562305.03 4207059.24 2.40 1.50 2.40 PERIOD 0.00580 ug/m^3 R-3 562279.13 4207106.06 2.44 1.50 2.44 PERIOD 0.00693 ug/m^3 R-4 562296.00 4207111.74 2.39 1.50 2.39 PERIOD 0.00798 ug/m^3 R-5 562304.79 4207117.42 2.80 1.50 2.80 PERIOD 0.01269 ug/m^3 R-6 562322.17 4207119.32 3.52 1.50 3.52 PERIOD 0.01598 ug/m^3 R-7 562333.83 4207123.38 3.89 1.50 3.89 PERIOD 0.01750 ug/m^3 R-8 562346.05 4207130.57 4.17 1.50 4.17 PERIOD 0.01983 ug/m^3 R-9 562359.62 4207135.24 4.36 1.50 4.36 PERIOD 0.02330 ug/m^3 R-10 562372.97 4207141.03 4.53 1.50 4.53 PERIOD 0.02753 ug/m^3 R-11 562386.19 4207148.75 4.70 1.50 4.70 PERIOD 0.03406 ug/m^3 R-12 562400.36 4207152.13 4.82 1.50 4.82 PERIOD 0.03620 ug/m^3 R-13 562410.20 4207156.25 4.91 1.50 30.41 PERIOD 0.03594 ug/m^3 R-14 562425.95 4207163.76 5.16 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.03468 ug/m^3 R-15 562439.64 4207168.84 5.52 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.02992 ug/m^3 R-16 562448.45 4207177.65 6.40 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.04445 ug/m^3 R-17 562457.39 4207154.50 5.95 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.04616 ug/m^3 R-18 562470.86 4207142.06 6.55 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.04005 ug/m^3 R-19 562483.62 4207129.91 7.26 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.03269 ug/m^3 R-20 562494.77 4207113.09 8.05 1.50 32.49 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 1 of 21
Appendix
A Page 180
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.03044 ug/m^3 R-21 562502.01 4207095.70 9.33 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.02613 ug/m^3 R-22 562513.36 4207078.68 10.75 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01715 ug/m^3 R-23 562522.88 4207065.10 12.32 1.50 31.59 PERIOD 0.00522 ug/m^3 R-24 562538.46 4207021.31 15.95 1.50 31.53 PERIOD 0.00473 ug/m^3 R-25 562556.90 4207027.02 17.04 1.50 27.75 PERIOD 0.00451 ug/m^3 R-26 562572.28 4207035.22 17.67 1.50 30.32 PERIOD 0.00398 ug/m^3 R-27 562588.97 4207044.15 20.29 1.50 27.75 PERIOD 0.00327 ug/m^3 R-28 562607.12 4207051.62 24.74 1.50 25.65 PERIOD 0.00295 ug/m^3 R-29 562625.42 4207064.35 26.31 1.50 26.31 PERIOD 0.00281 ug/m^3 R-30 562637.06 4207077.67 26.83 1.50 26.83 PERIOD 0.00262 ug/m^3 R-31 562649.81 4207092.83 27.36 1.50 27.36 PERIOD 0.00257 ug/m^3 R-32 562656.70 4207112.98 27.08 1.50 27.08 PERIOD 0.00246 ug/m^3 R-33 562662.56 4207131.75 27.73 1.50 30.36 PERIOD 0.00249 ug/m^3 R-34 562660.84 4207155.39 28.13 1.50 31.48 PERIOD 0.00256 ug/m^3 R-35 562656.88 4207175.55 28.69 1.50 31.48 PERIOD 0.00277 ug/m^3 R-36 562647.75 4207194.67 28.39 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00299 ug/m^3 R-37 562640.08 4207211.01 27.82 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00316 ug/m^3 R-38 562633.98 4207228.74 27.25 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00340 ug/m^3 R-39 562625.49 4207246.31 26.26 1.50 32.37 PERIOD 0.00771 ug/m^3 R-40 562566.88 4207085.38 14.28 1.50 32.49 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 2 of 21
Appendix
A Page 181
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00973 ug/m^3 R-41 562557.55 4207100.07 12.93 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01160 ug/m^3 R-42 562548.46 4207113.39 12.76 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01461 ug/m^3 R-43 562533.15 4207129.32 12.53 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00524 ug/m^3 R-44 562592.52 4207103.18 19.23 1.50 31.64 PERIOD 0.00442 ug/m^3 R-45 562607.46 4207116.87 20.81 1.50 31.64 PERIOD 0.00422 ug/m^3 R-46 562611.64 4207140.35 21.80 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00620 ug/m^3 R-47 562582.97 4207146.17 18.36 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00430 ug/m^3 R-48 562609.42 4207160.03 22.13 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00794 ug/m^3 R-49 562564.52 4207164.03 16.81 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00818 ug/m^3 R-50 562559.40 4207183.06 16.77 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00652 ug/m^3 R-51 562572.72 4207206.93 18.65 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.00512 ug/m^3 R-52 562591.23 4207215.76 21.15 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00538 ug/m^3 R-53 562580.09 4207241.29 21.94 1.50 32.37 PERIOD 0.00536 ug/m^3 R-54 562576.40 4207260.81 21.15 1.50 32.37 PERIOD 0.00517 ug/m^3 R-55 562577.58 4207278.68 19.68 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.00503 ug/m^3 R-56 562579.59 4207299.32 15.88 1.50 32.39 PERIOD 0.00476 ug/m^3 R-57 562582.23 4207316.96 14.03 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01571 ug/m^3 R-58 562524.48 4207146.24 12.34 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01790 ug/m^3 R-59 562512.14 4207161.68 11.32 1.50 32.49 PERIOD 0.01883 ug/m^3 R-60 562502.60 4207175.99 10.94 1.50 32.49 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 3 of 21
Appendix
A Page 182
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.01944 ug/m^3 R-61 562490.25 4207188.62 11.09 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01797 ug/m^3 R-62 562479.59 4207204.05 11.34 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01568 ug/m^3 R-63 562465.56 4207221.02 10.64 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01507 ug/m^3 R-64 562425.96 4207214.34 5.87 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01410 ug/m^3 R-65 562412.61 4207209.09 5.16 1.50 32.38 PERIOD 0.01304 ug/m^3 R-66 562402.35 4207205.04 4.97 1.50 14.10 PERIOD 0.01174 ug/m^3 R-67 562389.23 4207197.88 4.73 1.50 4.73 PERIOD 0.00782 ug/m^3 R-68 562357.51 4207185.00 4.28 1.50 4.28 PERIOD 0.00689 ug/m^3 R-69 562347.73 4207180.94 4.13 1.50 4.13 PERIOD 0.00579 ug/m^3 R-70 562333.42 4207174.50 3.85 1.50 3.85 PERIOD 0.00508 ug/m^3 R-71 562319.56 4207165.77 3.47 1.50 3.47 PERIOD 0.00427 ug/m^3 R-72 562307.80 4207162.73 3.03 1.50 3.03 PERIOD 0.00380 ug/m^3 R-73 562295.23 4207156.45 2.48 1.50 2.48 PERIOD 0.00346 ug/m^3 R-74 562281.85 4207150.97 2.35 1.50 2.35 PERIOD 0.00320 ug/m^3 R-75 562269.68 4207148.13 2.43 1.50 2.43 PERIOD 0.00313 ug/m^3 R-76 562255.69 4207142.05 2.58 1.50 2.58 PERIOD 0.00429 ug/m^3 R-77 562230.12 4206977.87 4.33 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00599 ug/m^3 R-78 562241.11 4206995.30 4.08 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00605 ug/m^3 R-79 562233.34 4207015.08 4.02 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00534 ug/m^3 R-80 562216.64 4207027.09 4.14 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 4 of 21
Appendix
A Page 183
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00502 ug/m^3 R-81 562208.44 4207038.37 4.13 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00343 ug/m^3 R-82 562211.07 4206975.81 4.60 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00196 ug/m^3 R-83 562444.86 4206878.58 10.34 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00195 ug/m^3 R-84 562434.77 4206866.25 9.91 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00196 ug/m^3 R-85 562423.69 4206856.66 9.42 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00150 ug/m^3 R-86 562419.10 4206817.49 8.63 1.50 44.03 PERIOD 0.00184 ug/m^3 R-87 562404.28 4206836.97 8.51 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00179 ug/m^3 R-88 562395.83 4206830.42 8.11 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00131 ug/m^3 R-89 562387.09 4206788.03 6.39 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00150 ug/m^3 R-90 562371.27 4206807.34 5.70 1.50 43.84 PERIOD 0.00161 ug/m^3 R-91 562366.91 4206816.18 5.86 1.50 34.43 PERIOD 0.00077 ug/m^3 R-92 562559.49 4206885.66 16.49 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00078 ug/m^3 R-93 562548.04 4206874.68 14.22 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00058 ug/m^3 R-94 562626.84 4206905.90 29.57 1.50 31.53 PERIOD 0.00045 ug/m^3 R-95 562663.83 4206894.92 32.30 1.50 32.30 PERIOD 0.00058 ug/m^3 R-96 562567.19 4206858.13 16.23 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00085 ug/m^3 R-97 562521.71 4206853.33 12.07 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00089 ug/m^3 R-98 562510.24 4206845.68 11.70 1.50 44.57 PERIOD 0.00015 ug/m^3 LCBMS-1 562103.04 4206790.15 10.69 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00014 ug/m^3 LCBMS-2 562122.03 4206757.18 6.68 1.50 50.63 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 5 of 21
Appendix
A Page 184
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 LCBMS-3 562190.19 4206791.82 6.10 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-4 562183.24 4206803.74 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00103 ug/m^3 LCBMS-5 562279.18 4206860.34 4.74 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00089 ug/m^3 LCBMS-6 562263.31 4206884.83 4.63 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00073 ug/m^3 LCBMS-7 562230.89 4206906.39 4.94 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 LCBMS-8 562192.97 4206912.57 5.30 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00060 ug/m^3 LCBMS-9 562157.64 4206906.27 5.52 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00046 ug/m^3 LCBMS-10 562134.18 4206893.22 6.06 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-11 562174.91 4206820.05 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00015 ug/m^3 LCBMS-12 562105.41 4206786.03 9.69 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00014 ug/m^3 LCBMS-13 562107.79 4206781.91 8.83 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00014 ug/m^3 LCBMS-14 562110.16 4206777.79 8.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00014 ug/m^3 LCBMS-15 562112.54 4206773.67 7.60 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00014 ug/m^3 LCBMS-16 562114.91 4206769.54 7.28 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00014 ug/m^3 LCBMS-17 562117.28 4206765.42 7.03 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00014 ug/m^3 LCBMS-18 562119.66 4206761.30 6.82 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00015 ug/m^3 LCBMS-19 562126.29 4206759.35 6.60 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00015 ug/m^3 LCBMS-20 562130.55 4206761.51 6.57 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00016 ug/m^3 LCBMS-21 562134.81 4206763.68 6.54 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00016 ug/m^3 LCBMS-22 562139.07 4206765.84 6.51 1.50 50.63 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 6 of 21
Appendix
A Page 185
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-23 562143.33 4206768.01 6.48 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-24 562147.59 4206770.17 6.44 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-25 562151.85 4206772.34 6.40 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-26 562156.11 4206774.50 6.36 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00019 ug/m^3 LCBMS-27 562160.37 4206776.67 6.32 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00020 ug/m^3 LCBMS-28 562164.63 4206778.83 6.28 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00021 ug/m^3 LCBMS-29 562168.89 4206781.00 6.23 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00022 ug/m^3 LCBMS-30 562173.15 4206783.16 6.19 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00023 ug/m^3 LCBMS-31 562177.41 4206785.33 6.17 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00024 ug/m^3 LCBMS-32 562181.67 4206787.49 6.15 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-33 562185.93 4206789.66 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-34 562187.87 4206795.79 6.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-35 562185.56 4206799.77 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 LCBMS-36 562187.41 4206806.20 6.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 LCBMS-37 562191.58 4206808.66 6.07 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00028 ug/m^3 LCBMS-38 562195.75 4206811.12 6.02 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 LCBMS-39 562199.93 4206813.58 5.98 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 LCBMS-40 562204.10 4206816.04 5.95 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 LCBMS-41 562208.27 4206818.51 5.91 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 LCBMS-42 562212.44 4206820.97 5.88 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 7 of 21
Appendix
A Page 186
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00037 ug/m^3 LCBMS-43 562216.61 4206823.43 5.85 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 LCBMS-44 562220.78 4206825.89 5.83 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 LCBMS-45 562224.95 4206828.35 5.79 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 LCBMS-46 562229.12 4206830.81 5.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00047 ug/m^3 LCBMS-47 562233.30 4206833.27 5.73 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 LCBMS-48 562237.47 4206835.73 5.70 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00053 ug/m^3 LCBMS-49 562241.64 4206838.19 5.67 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00057 ug/m^3 LCBMS-50 562245.81 4206840.65 5.62 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00061 ug/m^3 LCBMS-51 562249.98 4206843.11 5.57 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00066 ug/m^3 LCBMS-52 562254.15 4206845.58 5.51 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00070 ug/m^3 LCBMS-53 562258.32 4206848.04 5.43 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00076 ug/m^3 LCBMS-54 562262.49 4206850.50 5.35 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00082 ug/m^3 LCBMS-55 562266.67 4206852.96 5.25 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00088 ug/m^3 LCBMS-56 562270.84 4206855.42 5.13 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00095 ug/m^3 LCBMS-57 562275.01 4206857.88 4.95 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00101 ug/m^3 LCBMS-58 562276.54 4206864.42 4.72 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00098 ug/m^3 LCBMS-59 562273.89 4206868.50 4.72 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00096 ug/m^3 LCBMS-60 562271.25 4206872.59 4.73 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00094 ug/m^3 LCBMS-61 562268.60 4206876.67 4.71 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00091 ug/m^3 LCBMS-62 562265.95 4206880.75 4.67 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 8 of 21
Appendix
A Page 187
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00084 ug/m^3 LCBMS-63 562259.26 4206887.53 4.66 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00080 ug/m^3 LCBMS-64 562255.20 4206890.22 4.71 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00077 ug/m^3 LCBMS-65 562251.15 4206892.92 4.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00075 ug/m^3 LCBMS-66 562247.10 4206895.61 4.81 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00073 ug/m^3 LCBMS-67 562243.05 4206898.31 4.84 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 LCBMS-68 562239.00 4206901.00 4.86 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 LCBMS-69 562234.94 4206903.70 4.90 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 LCBMS-70 562226.15 4206907.16 5.02 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00071 ug/m^3 LCBMS-71 562221.41 4206907.93 5.10 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00071 ug/m^3 LCBMS-72 562216.67 4206908.71 5.14 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00071 ug/m^3 LCBMS-73 562211.93 4206909.48 5.18 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00071 ug/m^3 LCBMS-74 562207.19 4206910.25 5.21 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00071 ug/m^3 LCBMS-75 562202.45 4206911.03 5.24 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 LCBMS-76 562197.71 4206911.80 5.27 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00070 ug/m^3 LCBMS-77 562188.55 4206911.78 5.32 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00068 ug/m^3 LCBMS-78 562184.14 4206911.00 5.34 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00067 ug/m^3 LCBMS-79 562179.72 4206910.21 5.36 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00065 ug/m^3 LCBMS-80 562175.31 4206909.42 5.38 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00064 ug/m^3 LCBMS-81 562170.89 4206908.63 5.41 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00062 ug/m^3 LCBMS-82 562166.47 4206907.85 5.44 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 9 of 21
Appendix
A Page 188
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00061 ug/m^3 LCBMS-83 562162.06 4206907.06 5.48 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00057 ug/m^3 LCBMS-84 562153.73 4206904.10 5.57 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00054 ug/m^3 LCBMS-85 562149.82 4206901.92 5.63 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 LCBMS-86 562145.91 4206899.75 5.70 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00050 ug/m^3 LCBMS-87 562142.00 4206897.57 5.82 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00048 ug/m^3 LCBMS-88 562138.09 4206895.39 5.94 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 LCBMS-89 562136.58 4206888.92 6.07 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 LCBMS-90 562138.97 4206884.61 6.08 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 LCBMS-91 562141.37 4206880.31 6.10 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 LCBMS-92 562143.76 4206876.00 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 LCBMS-93 562146.16 4206871.70 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 LCBMS-94 562148.56 4206867.39 6.16 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 LCBMS-95 562150.95 4206863.09 6.17 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00029 ug/m^3 LCBMS-96 562153.35 4206858.79 6.18 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00028 ug/m^3 LCBMS-97 562155.74 4206854.48 6.19 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 LCBMS-98 562158.14 4206850.18 6.20 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 LCBMS-99 562160.53 4206845.88 6.20 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 LCBMS-100 562162.93 4206841.57 6.21 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 LCBMS-101 562165.33 4206837.27 6.21 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-102 562167.72 4206832.96 6.19 1.50 50.63 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 10 of 21
Appendix
A Page 189
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-103 562170.12 4206828.66 6.16 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 LCBMS-104 562172.51 4206824.35 6.14 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00024 ug/m^3 LCBMS-105 562170.42 4206818.18 6.19 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00023 ug/m^3 LCBMS-106 562165.93 4206816.31 6.27 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00022 ug/m^3 LCBMS-107 562161.43 4206814.44 6.34 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00021 ug/m^3 LCBMS-108 562156.94 4206812.58 6.41 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00021 ug/m^3 LCBMS-109 562152.45 4206810.71 6.48 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00020 ug/m^3 LCBMS-110 562147.96 4206808.84 6.55 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00019 ug/m^3 LCBMS-111 562143.47 4206806.97 6.59 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00019 ug/m^3 LCBMS-112 562138.98 4206805.10 6.62 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-113 562134.48 4206803.23 6.65 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00018 ug/m^3 LCBMS-114 562129.99 4206801.36 6.68 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-115 562125.50 4206799.49 6.71 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00017 ug/m^3 LCBMS-116 562121.01 4206797.63 7.34 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00016 ug/m^3 LCBMS-117 562116.52 4206795.76 8.35 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00015 ug/m^3 LCBMS-118 562112.02 4206793.89 9.25 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00015 ug/m^3 LCBMS-119 562107.53 4206792.02 10.03 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00154 ug/m^3 LAFD-1 562242.15 4207189.12 2.45 1.50 2.45 PERIOD 0.00250 ug/m^3 LAFD-2 562255.39 4207158.50 2.50 1.50 2.50 PERIOD 0.00253 ug/m^3 LAFD-3 562235.26 4207149.71 2.74 1.50 2.74 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 11 of 21
Appendix
A Page 190
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00204 ug/m^3 LAFD-4 562227.31 4207163.59 2.73 1.50 2.73 PERIOD 0.00173 ug/m^3 LAFD-5 562225.09 4207175.24 2.68 1.50 2.68 PERIOD 0.00156 ug/m^3 LAFD-6 562229.54 4207184.67 2.58 1.50 2.58 PERIOD 0.00164 ug/m^3 LAFD-7 562244.04 4207184.75 2.46 1.50 2.46 PERIOD 0.00176 ug/m^3 LAFD-8 562245.93 4207180.37 2.46 1.50 2.46 PERIOD 0.00188 ug/m^3 LAFD-9 562247.82 4207176.00 2.47 1.50 2.47 PERIOD 0.00201 ug/m^3 LAFD-10 562249.72 4207171.62 2.48 1.50 2.48 PERIOD 0.00216 ug/m^3 LAFD-11 562251.61 4207167.25 2.49 1.50 2.49 PERIOD 0.00232 ug/m^3 LAFD-12 562253.50 4207162.87 2.50 1.50 2.50 PERIOD 0.00250 ug/m^3 LAFD-13 562251.36 4207156.74 2.55 1.50 2.55 PERIOD 0.00250 ug/m^3 LAFD-14 562247.34 4207154.98 2.59 1.50 2.59 PERIOD 0.00251 ug/m^3 LAFD-15 562243.31 4207153.23 2.64 1.50 2.64 PERIOD 0.00252 ug/m^3 LAFD-16 562239.29 4207151.47 2.69 1.50 2.69 PERIOD 0.00239 ug/m^3 LAFD-17 562233.27 4207153.18 2.74 1.50 2.74 PERIOD 0.00227 ug/m^3 LAFD-18 562231.29 4207156.65 2.74 1.50 2.74 PERIOD 0.00215 ug/m^3 LAFD-19 562229.30 4207160.12 2.73 1.50 2.73 PERIOD 0.00193 ug/m^3 LAFD-20 562226.57 4207167.47 2.71 1.50 2.71 PERIOD 0.00183 ug/m^3 LAFD-21 562225.83 4207171.36 2.70 1.50 2.70 PERIOD 0.00167 ug/m^3 LAFD-22 562226.57 4207178.38 2.64 1.50 2.64 PERIOD 0.00161 ug/m^3 LAFD-23 562228.06 4207181.53 2.61 1.50 2.61 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 12 of 21
Appendix
A Page 191
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00155 ug/m^3 LAFD-24 562233.74 4207186.15 2.54 1.50 2.54 PERIOD 0.00154 ug/m^3 LAFD-25 562237.95 4207187.64 2.49 1.50 2.49 PERIOD 0.00025 ug/m^3 PCP-1 562185.94 4206803.18 6.12 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 PCP-2 562213.54 4206752.30 6.24 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00046 ug/m^3 PCP-3 562243.21 4206767.30 6.11 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00049 ug/m^3 PCP-4 562256.49 4206746.43 6.42 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00123 ug/m^3 PCP-5 562333.43 4206801.29 4.81 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00105 ug/m^3 PCP-6 562280.82 4206860.28 4.69 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 PCP-7 562188.24 4206798.94 6.11 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 PCP-8 562190.54 4206794.70 6.10 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00026 ug/m^3 PCP-9 562192.84 4206790.46 6.09 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 PCP-10 562195.14 4206786.22 6.08 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 PCP-11 562197.44 4206781.98 6.07 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00028 ug/m^3 PCP-12 562199.74 4206777.74 6.08 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00028 ug/m^3 PCP-13 562202.04 4206773.50 6.10 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00029 ug/m^3 PCP-14 562204.34 4206769.26 6.13 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 PCP-15 562206.64 4206765.02 6.16 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00030 ug/m^3 PCP-16 562208.94 4206760.78 6.19 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 PCP-17 562211.24 4206756.54 6.21 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 PCP-18 562217.78 4206754.44 6.23 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 13 of 21
Appendix
A Page 192
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 PCP-19 562222.02 4206756.59 6.22 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00037 ug/m^3 PCP-20 562226.26 4206758.73 6.20 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 PCP-21 562230.49 4206760.87 6.19 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 PCP-22 562234.73 4206763.01 6.16 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 PCP-23 562238.97 4206765.16 6.14 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00047 ug/m^3 PCP-24 562245.87 4206763.13 6.16 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00047 ug/m^3 PCP-25 562248.52 4206758.95 6.22 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00048 ug/m^3 PCP-26 562251.18 4206754.78 6.28 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00049 ug/m^3 PCP-27 562253.83 4206750.60 6.35 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00052 ug/m^3 PCP-28 562260.54 4206749.32 6.39 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00055 ug/m^3 PCP-29 562264.59 4206752.21 6.36 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00057 ug/m^3 PCP-30 562268.64 4206755.09 6.33 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00060 ug/m^3 PCP-31 562272.69 4206757.98 6.30 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00063 ug/m^3 PCP-32 562276.74 4206760.87 6.27 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00066 ug/m^3 PCP-33 562280.79 4206763.75 6.24 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00070 ug/m^3 PCP-34 562284.84 4206766.64 6.20 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00073 ug/m^3 PCP-35 562288.89 4206769.53 6.17 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00077 ug/m^3 PCP-36 562292.94 4206772.42 6.14 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00081 ug/m^3 PCP-37 562296.98 4206775.30 6.10 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00085 ug/m^3 PCP-38 562301.03 4206778.19 6.04 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 14 of 21
Appendix
A Page 193
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00089 ug/m^3 PCP-39 562305.08 4206781.08 5.98 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00093 ug/m^3 PCP-40 562309.13 4206783.97 5.92 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00098 ug/m^3 PCP-41 562313.18 4206786.85 5.85 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00103 ug/m^3 PCP-42 562317.23 4206789.74 5.78 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00108 ug/m^3 PCP-43 562321.28 4206792.63 5.62 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00113 ug/m^3 PCP-44 562325.33 4206795.51 5.39 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00118 ug/m^3 PCP-45 562329.38 4206798.40 5.12 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00124 ug/m^3 PCP-46 562330.14 4206804.98 4.82 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00125 ug/m^3 PCP-47 562326.85 4206808.66 4.87 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00125 ug/m^3 PCP-48 562323.57 4206812.35 4.93 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00126 ug/m^3 PCP-49 562320.28 4206816.04 4.92 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00125 ug/m^3 PCP-50 562316.99 4206819.72 4.83 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00125 ug/m^3 PCP-51 562313.70 4206823.41 4.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00124 ug/m^3 PCP-52 562310.41 4206827.10 4.73 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00123 ug/m^3 PCP-53 562307.13 4206830.79 4.74 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00122 ug/m^3 PCP-54 562303.84 4206834.47 4.79 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00121 ug/m^3 PCP-55 562300.55 4206838.16 4.87 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00119 ug/m^3 PCP-56 562297.26 4206841.85 4.93 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00117 ug/m^3 PCP-57 562293.97 4206845.53 4.92 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00114 ug/m^3 PCP-58 562290.68 4206849.22 4.83 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 15 of 21
Appendix
A Page 194
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00111 ug/m^3 PCP-59 562287.40 4206852.91 4.76 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00108 ug/m^3 PCP-60 562284.11 4206856.59 4.71 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00098 ug/m^3 PCP-61 562276.69 4206857.80 4.90 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00090 ug/m^3 PCP-62 562272.57 4206855.32 5.08 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00084 ug/m^3 PCP-63 562268.44 4206852.83 5.23 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00078 ug/m^3 PCP-64 562264.32 4206850.35 5.33 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00072 ug/m^3 PCP-65 562260.19 4206847.87 5.41 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00067 ug/m^3 PCP-66 562256.07 4206845.38 5.49 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00063 ug/m^3 PCP-67 562251.94 4206842.90 5.56 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00059 ug/m^3 PCP-68 562247.82 4206840.42 5.61 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00055 ug/m^3 PCP-69 562243.69 4206837.94 5.66 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00051 ug/m^3 PCP-70 562239.57 4206835.45 5.69 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00048 ug/m^3 PCP-71 562235.44 4206832.97 5.72 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00045 ug/m^3 PCP-72 562231.32 4206830.49 5.75 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 PCP-73 562227.19 4206828.01 5.78 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 PCP-74 562223.07 4206825.52 5.82 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 PCP-75 562218.94 4206823.04 5.85 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 PCP-76 562214.82 4206820.56 5.87 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 PCP-77 562210.69 4206818.08 5.91 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00032 ug/m^3 PCP-78 562206.57 4206815.59 5.94 1.50 40.66 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 16 of 21
Appendix
A Page 195
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00031 ug/m^3 PCP-79 562202.44 4206813.11 5.97 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00029 ug/m^3 PCP-80 562198.32 4206810.63 6.01 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00028 ug/m^3 PCP-81 562194.19 4206808.14 6.05 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00027 ug/m^3 PCP-82 562190.07 4206805.66 6.09 1.50 50.63 PERIOD 0.00220 ug/m^3 PSC-1 562305.93 4206897.31 5.25 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00364 ug/m^3 PSC-2 562330.42 4206909.56 7.31 1.50 7.31 PERIOD 0.00227 ug/m^3 PSC-3 562362.85 4206855.73 7.44 1.50 7.44 PERIOD 0.00185 ug/m^3 PSC-4 562343.02 4206842.45 5.25 1.50 32.90 PERIOD 0.00244 ug/m^3 PSC-5 562310.01 4206899.35 5.80 1.50 6.76 PERIOD 0.00267 ug/m^3 PSC-6 562314.09 4206901.39 6.34 1.50 6.76 PERIOD 0.00290 ug/m^3 PSC-7 562318.18 4206903.43 6.82 1.50 6.82 PERIOD 0.00314 ug/m^3 PSC-8 562322.26 4206905.48 7.00 1.50 7.00 PERIOD 0.00339 ug/m^3 PSC-9 562326.34 4206907.52 7.16 1.50 7.16 PERIOD 0.00350 ug/m^3 PSC-10 562332.91 4206905.42 7.36 1.50 7.36 PERIOD 0.00336 ug/m^3 PSC-11 562335.41 4206901.28 7.44 1.50 7.44 PERIOD 0.00324 ug/m^3 PSC-12 562337.90 4206897.14 7.45 1.50 7.45 PERIOD 0.00313 ug/m^3 PSC-13 562340.40 4206893.00 7.49 1.50 7.49 PERIOD 0.00301 ug/m^3 PSC-14 562342.89 4206888.86 7.55 1.50 7.55 PERIOD 0.00291 ug/m^3 PSC-15 562345.39 4206884.72 7.57 1.50 7.57 PERIOD 0.00281 ug/m^3 PSC-16 562347.88 4206880.58 7.58 1.50 7.58 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 17 of 21
Appendix
A Page 196
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00271 ug/m^3 PSC-17 562350.38 4206876.43 7.59 1.50 7.59 PERIOD 0.00262 ug/m^3 PSC-18 562352.87 4206872.29 7.60 1.50 7.60 PERIOD 0.00253 ug/m^3 PSC-19 562355.37 4206868.15 7.56 1.50 7.56 PERIOD 0.00244 ug/m^3 PSC-20 562357.86 4206864.01 7.47 1.50 7.47 PERIOD 0.00236 ug/m^3 PSC-21 562360.36 4206859.87 7.43 1.50 7.43 PERIOD 0.00220 ug/m^3 PSC-22 562358.88 4206853.07 7.09 1.50 7.09 PERIOD 0.00212 ug/m^3 PSC-23 562354.92 4206850.42 6.71 1.50 6.71 PERIOD 0.00204 ug/m^3 PSC-24 562350.95 4206847.76 6.27 1.50 6.27 PERIOD 0.00195 ug/m^3 PSC-25 562346.99 4206845.11 5.79 1.50 5.79 PERIOD 0.00189 ug/m^3 PSC-26 562340.37 4206846.37 5.38 1.50 5.38 PERIOD 0.00193 ug/m^3 PSC-27 562337.72 4206850.29 5.48 1.50 5.48 PERIOD 0.00197 ug/m^3 PSC-28 562335.07 4206854.21 5.53 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00201 ug/m^3 PSC-29 562332.42 4206858.12 5.53 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00204 ug/m^3 PSC-30 562329.77 4206862.04 5.50 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00207 ug/m^3 PSC-31 562327.12 4206865.96 5.41 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00209 ug/m^3 PSC-32 562324.48 4206869.88 5.29 1.50 7.27 PERIOD 0.00212 ug/m^3 PSC-33 562321.83 4206873.80 5.25 1.50 5.25 PERIOD 0.00214 ug/m^3 PSC-34 562319.18 4206877.72 5.26 1.50 5.26 PERIOD 0.00217 ug/m^3 PSC-35 562316.53 4206881.64 5.34 1.50 5.34 PERIOD 0.00219 ug/m^3 PSC-36 562313.88 4206885.55 5.40 1.50 5.40 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 18 of 21
Appendix
A Page 197
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00220 ug/m^3 PSC-37 562311.23 4206889.47 5.41 1.50 6.76 PERIOD 0.00220 ug/m^3 PSC-38 562308.58 4206893.39 5.36 1.50 40.66 PERIOD 0.00037 ug/m^3 SJC-1 562303.47 4206592.57 9.32 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00045 ug/m^3 SJC-2 562344.28 4206615.31 8.59 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 SJC-3 562373.32 4206568.00 8.40 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 SJC-4 562334.13 4206544.65 9.25 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00037 ug/m^3 SJC-5 562307.55 4206594.84 9.25 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 SJC-6 562311.63 4206597.12 9.18 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 SJC-7 562315.71 4206599.39 9.11 1.50 38.28 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 SJC-8 562319.79 4206601.67 9.04 1.50 9.04 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-9 562323.88 4206603.94 8.96 1.50 8.96 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-10 562327.96 4206606.21 8.88 1.50 8.88 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-11 562332.04 4206608.49 8.80 1.50 37.69 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 SJC-12 562336.12 4206610.76 8.73 1.50 37.69 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 SJC-13 562340.20 4206613.04 8.66 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 SJC-14 562346.70 4206611.37 8.59 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00044 ug/m^3 SJC-15 562349.12 4206607.43 8.59 1.50 39.11 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 SJC-16 562351.54 4206603.48 8.58 1.50 39.99 PERIOD 0.00043 ug/m^3 SJC-17 562353.96 4206599.54 8.58 1.50 39.99 PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-18 562356.38 4206595.60 8.57 1.50 39.99 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 19 of 21
Appendix
A Page 198
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00042 ug/m^3 SJC-19 562358.80 4206591.66 8.56 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-20 562361.22 4206587.71 8.54 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00041 ug/m^3 SJC-21 562363.64 4206583.77 8.52 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 SJC-22 562366.06 4206579.83 8.49 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00040 ug/m^3 SJC-23 562368.48 4206575.89 8.46 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00039 ug/m^3 SJC-24 562370.90 4206571.94 8.43 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 SJC-25 562369.40 4206565.67 8.49 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00038 ug/m^3 SJC-26 562365.48 4206563.33 8.58 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00037 ug/m^3 SJC-27 562361.56 4206561.00 8.67 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 SJC-28 562357.64 4206558.66 8.76 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 SJC-29 562353.73 4206556.33 8.84 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 SJC-30 562349.81 4206553.99 8.93 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 SJC-31 562345.89 4206551.66 9.01 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 SJC-32 562341.97 4206549.32 9.09 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 SJC-33 562338.05 4206546.99 9.17 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00033 ug/m^3 SJC-34 562331.57 4206548.64 9.28 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 SJC-35 562329.02 4206552.64 9.31 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 SJC-36 562326.46 4206556.63 9.34 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00034 ug/m^3 SJC-37 562323.91 4206560.62 9.36 1.50 93.89 PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 SJC-38 562321.36 4206564.62 9.38 1.50 93.89 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 20 of 21
Appendix
A Page 199
Sensitive Receptor Summary
21180006 Skelly Residential ProjectPhases 2 thru 5 DevelopmentPM2.5 - Concentration - Source Group: ALL Averaging
Period Rank Peak
X
(m)
Y
(m)
ZELEV
(m)
ZHILL
(m)
Peak Date,
Start Hour
ZFLAG
(m) Units
Receptor
ID
PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 SJC-39 562318.80 4206568.61 9.38 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00035 ug/m^3 SJC-40 562316.25 4206572.60 9.38 1.50 86.08 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 SJC-41 562313.69 4206576.60 9.37 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 SJC-42 562311.14 4206580.59 9.36 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 SJC-43 562308.58 4206584.58 9.35 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.00036 ug/m^3 SJC-44 562306.03 4206588.58 9.34 1.50 82.06 PERIOD 0.06321 ug/m^3 OSR-1 562414.89 4207033.80 7.12 1.50 12.72 PERIOD 0.04281 ug/m^3 OSR-2 562430.23 4207034.32 8.59 1.50 12.72 PERIOD 0.03053 ug/m^3 OSR-3 562443.53 4207035.00 10.01 1.50 12.72 PERIOD 0.04030 ug/m^3 OSR-4 562422.56 4206993.06 8.02 1.50 31.53 PERIOD 0.02335 ug/m^3 OSR-5 562434.67 4206992.55 9.37 1.50 31.53 PERIOD 0.01584 ug/m^3 OSR-6 562447.11 4206995.44 10.84 1.50 12.82 PERIOD 0.01160 ug/m^3 OSR-7 562459.90 4206995.96 12.39 1.50 12.82 PERIOD 0.00972 ug/m^3 OSR-8 562472.34 4206998.68 13.15 1.50 13.15 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software 4/12/2022
Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc RS - 21 of 21
Appendix
A Page 200
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 1 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_P Appendix A
hases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Polygon Area Sources
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: PROJECTSITE (Project Site - Site-wide Grading and Site Prep) X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
2.68 3.33 0.00E+0 30 562307.78 4207095.31
0.00E+0 562401.56 4207132.770.00E+0 562453.03 4207129.990.00E+0 562505.54 4207055.790.00E+0 562517.03 4207028.390.00E+0 562508.70 4207024.880.00E+0 562519.86 4206999.030.00E+0 562499.01 4206995.310.00E+0 562506.66 4206980.220.00E+0 562535.68 4206985.460.00E+0 562541.19 4206973.550.00E+0 562503.86 4206966.910.00E+0 562470.86 4206962.000.00E+0 562439.86 4206958.310.00E+0 562438.77 4206965.910.00E+0 562414.78 4206963.740.00E+0 562400.21 4206962.530.00E+0 562382.09 4206961.480.00E+0 562365.63 4206960.700.00E+0 562350.20 4206960.140.00E+0 562331.99 4206959.790.00E+0 562315.36 4206959.790.00E+0 562301.59 4206959.850.00E+0 562301.64 4206961.660.00E+0 562297.63 4206961.820.00E+0 562297.79 4206967.980.00E+0 562297.77 4206972.160.00E+0 562297.72 4206978.090.00E+0 562297.24 4206985.480.00E+0 562318.71 4207052.95 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 2 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_P Appendix A
hases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: PROJECTSITE (Project Site - Site-wide Grading and Site Prep) X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 3 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_P Appendix A
hases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Source Type: AREA POLY
Source: PH.2.TO.5 (Phases 2 through 5 Construction after intro of new receptors) X Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Y Coordinate
for Vertices
[m]
Base
Elevation
(Optional)
Emission
Rate
[g/ (s-m^2)]
Release
Height
[m]
Initial
Vertical
Dim. [m]
Number of
Vertices
(or sides)
7.25 3.33 2.47E-8 26 562415.03 4207004.73
2.47E-8 562407.75 4207018.642.47E-8 562407.91 4207048.342.47E-8 562449.62 4207052.402.47E-8 562475.22 4207030.412.47E-8 562480.63 4207027.822.47E-8 562509.69 4207039.222.47E-8 562503.69 4207053.032.47E-8 562490.40 4207071.682.47E-8 562464.02 4207055.262.47E-8 562449.38 4207076.282.47E-8 562473.94 4207094.892.47E-8 562450.29 4207128.522.47E-8 562403.09 4207130.912.47E-8 562366.48 4207116.772.47E-8 562378.74 4207084.552.47E-8 562354.85 4207073.662.47E-8 562349.17 4207064.282.47E-8 562311.06 4207083.972.47E-8 562319.40 4207051.982.47E-8 562297.77 4206985.642.47E-8 562298.03 4206961.262.47E-8 562302.32 4206961.222.47E-8 562302.19 4206959.682.47E-8 562354.11 4206960.332.47E-8 562418.58 4206963.43 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 4 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_P Appendix A
hases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line Volume Sources
Source Type: LINE VOLUMESource: SKELLYRD (Skelly Road - Off-Site Emissions) Release Height
[m]
Base Elevation
[m]
Y Coordinate for points
[m]
X Coordinate for Points
[m]
Length of Side
[m]
Emission Rate
[g/ s]
Building Height
[m]
12.00 1.17E-7 562513.83 4207036.73 14.75 3.12
562561.10 4207060.25 13.15 3.12562596.00 4207075.54 19.76 3.12562619.04 4207096.26 24.67 3.12562634.60 4207128.45 24.74 3.12562635.36 4207150.41 24.65 3.12562629.93 4207172.50 22.40 3.12562606.40 4207228.76 24.45 3.12562603.93 4207236.59 24.54 3.12562601.14 4207256.12 23.24 3.12562600.97 4207279.44 22.11 3.12562605.24 4207329.80 14.50 3.12 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 5 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_P Appendix A
hases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Volume Sources Generated from Line Sources
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
SKELLYRD L0000001 562519.20 4207039.40 14.38 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9 L0000002 562529.94 4207044.75 13.99 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000003 562540.69 4207050.09 13.52 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000004 562551.43 4207055.44 13.04 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000005 562562.20 4207060.73 13.44 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000006 562573.19 4207065.55 16.14 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000007 562584.18 4207070.36 18.68 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000008 562595.17 4207075.18 21.29 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000009 562604.25 4207082.96 23.30 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000010 562613.17 4207090.99 24.36 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9 L0000011 562620.83 4207099.96 24.34 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9 L0000012 562626.05 4207110.77 24.17 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000013 562631.28 4207121.57 24.46 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000014 562634.75 4207132.80 24.88 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000015 562635.17 4207144.80 24.90 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000016 562633.84 4207156.61 25.09 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000017 562630.98 4207168.26 25.28 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000018 562626.99 4207179.55 25.27 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000019 562622.36 4207190.62 24.90 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000020 562617.73 4207201.69 24.54 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000021 562613.10 4207212.76 24.24 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000022 562608.46 4207223.83 24.08 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000023 562604.40 4207235.11 24.05 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000024 562602.46 4207246.93 23.88 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 6 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_P Appendix A
hases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc
Source Pathway - Source Inputs
AERMOD
Line
Source
ID
Volume
Source
ID
X Coordinate
[m]
Y Coordinate
[m]
Base
Elevation
[m]
Release
Height
[m[
Emission
Rate
[g/s]
Length of
Side
[m]
Building
Height
[m]
Initial Lateral
Dimencion
[m]
Initial Vertical
Dimencion
[m]
SKELLYRD L0000025 562601.12 4207258.84 23.18 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9 L0000026 562601.04 4207270.83 22.59 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000027 562601.26 4207282.82 20.26 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000028 562602.27 4207294.78 17.73 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000029 562603.29 4207306.74 15.73 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9L0000030 562604.30 4207318.69 15.10 3.12 12.00 5.58 2.90 3.91E-9 AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software SO1 - 7 4/12/2022 Project File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\21180006 Skelly Residential_P Appendix A
hases 2 thru 5\21180006 Skelly Residential_Phases 2 thru 5.isc
Skelly Residential Project Energy Use Summary
Summary of Energy Use During Construction (Annually)
Construction vehicle fuel 8,254 gallons (gasoline, diesel) Construction equipment fuel 24,300 gallons (diesel)
Total construction fuel 32,555 gallons (gasoline, diesel) Construction office electricity 6,555 kilowatt hours
Summary of Energy Use During Operations (Annually)
Operation vehicle fuel 29,686 gallons (gasoline, diesel) Operation natural gas 1,540,000 kilo‐British Thermal Units Operation electricity 256,033 kilowatt hours
Appendix A Page 208
Skelly Residential Project Construction Assumptions
CalEEMod output file: Skelly Rd Construction (Before New Receptors) ‐ Contra Costa County, Annua Time stamp: Date: 4/7/2022 9:17 AM
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date
Num Days
Week Num Days
Demolition Demolition 10/11/2023 2/1/2024 5 82
Site Preparation (site‐wide) Site preparation 10/11/2023 2/1/2024 5 82 Grading (site‐wide) Grading 10/11/2023 12/6/2023 5 41
Paving (roadways and
foundations) Paving 12/1/2023 2/1/2024 5 45
Building Construction
(Model Homes) Building Construction 1/19/2024 2/1/2024 5 10 Architectural Coating
(pavement and model
homes) Architectural Coating 1/19/2024 2/1/2024 5 10
Building Construction (Pre
receptors) Building Construction 2/2/2024 6/5/2024 5 89 Architectural Coating (Pre
receptors) Architectural Coating 2/16/2024 6/5/2024 5 79 Building Construction (post
receptors) Building Construction 6/6/2024 10/30/2024 5 105 Architectural Coating (post
receptors) Architectural Coating 6/6/2024 10/30/2024 5 105 Total Workdays 648
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Excavators 1 8 158 0.38
Site Preparation (site‐wide) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 Grading (site‐wide) Graders 1 8 187 0.41
Grading (site‐wide) Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4
Grading (site‐wide) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 Paving (roadways and
foundations) Pavers 1 8 130 0.42
Paving (roadways and
foundations) Paving Equipment 1 8 132 0.36
Paving (roadways and
foundations) Rollers 1 7 80 0.38
Building Construction
(Model Homes) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 97 0.37
Building Construction
(Model Homes) Cranes 1 7 97 0.37
Building Construction
(Model Homes) Forklifts 1 8 130 0.42
Building Construction
(Model Homes) Generator Sets 1 8 132 0.36
Building Construction
(Model Homes) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 80 0.38
Architectural Coating
(pavement and model
homes) Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48
Building Construction (Pre
receptors) Cranes 1 7 97 0.37
Building Construction (Pre
receptors) Forklifts 1 8 130 0.42
Building Construction (Pre
receptors) Generator Sets 1 8 132 0.36
Building Construction (Pre
receptors) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 80 0.38
Architectural Coating (Pre
receptors) Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48
On‐Site Construction
Off‐Road Equipment
Appendix A Page 209
Building Construction (post
receptors) Cranes 1 7 97 0.37
Building Construction (post
receptors) Forklifts 1 8 130 0.42
Building Construction (post
receptors) Generator Sets 1 8 132 0.36
Building Construction (post
receptors) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 80 0.38
Architectural Coating (post
receptors) Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48
Phase Name Worker Trip Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Demolition 5 0 224 10.8 7.3 20
Site Preparation (site‐wide) 3 0 0 10.8 7.3 20
Grading (site‐wide) 8 0 0 10.8 7.3 20
Paving (roadways and
foundations) 8 0 0 10.8 7.3 20
Building Construction
(Model Homes) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20
Architectural Coating
(pavement and model
homes) 10 0
0 10.8 7.3 20
Building Construction (Pre
receptors) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20
Architectural Coating (Pre
receptors) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20
Building Construction (post
receptors) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20
Architectural Coating (post
receptors) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20
Trips and VMT
Appendix A Page 210
Construction Vehicle Fuel Calculations
California Air Resource Board (ARB). 2022. EMFAC2017 Web Database. Website: https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissions‐inventory/9d80a196ff7175eb01f2161f39e572013131647b. Accessed April 12, 2022 VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled
FE = Fuel Economy
Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emissions InventoryRegion Type: CountyRegion: Contra CostaCalendar Year: 2024Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel ConsumptionRegion CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel_Consumption FE VMT*FE (mi/day) (1000 gallons/day) (mi/gallon)
CONTRA COSTA 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2.5538992 326.0302982 51.09842 0.073466 4.437855443 1446.875334CONTRA COSTA 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5197.8222 628100.9399 54490.17 92.41798 6.79630661 4268766.57 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 415473.55 15421746.18 1949195 469.7434 32.83014843 506298216.1CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4583.4538 173065.8983 21477.78 3.441231 50.29185725 8703805.451 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 42903.228 1560070.346 196335.5 55.8014 27.9575489 43615742.98CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 23.39799 398.9985164 77.63046 0.016483 24.20605452 9658.179843 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 136800.1 5101359.876 635180.3 196.0618 26.01914803 132733037.7 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 961.6321 40776.24302 4679.641 1.10959 36.748913 1498482.607 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 10141.215 353591.6844 151089 41.71301 8.476772663 2997316.324 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8597.3408 314852.4382 108143.7 17.12671 18.38370707 5788154.995CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1267.0063 45469.50058 18876.51 6.08917 7.467273689 339533.2054 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2958.1461 110401.0059 37209.76 6.718772 16.43172465 1814078.93CONTRA COSTA 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 807.40555 45803.81966 16154.57 9.192351 4.982818755 228232.1317 CONTRA COSTA 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4601.6248 262908.2893 43927.33 26.81733 9.803671632 2577466.537 Worker
Sum of VMT*FE (Column BI) 692858943
Total VMT 22297417.54
Weighted Average FE 31.07350624
Vendor
Sum of VMT*FE (Column BI) 18014995.57
Total VMT 1761453.708
Weighted Average FE 10.22734545
Haul
Sum of VMT*FE (Column BI) 4270213.445
Total VMT 628426.9702
Weighted Average FE 6.795083037
Skelly Residential Project Construction Assumptions
On‐site Construction
Source: AQ/GHG Appendix, CalEEMod Output
Skelly Rd Construction (Before New Receptors) ‐ Contra Costa County, Annual Date: 4/12/2022 1:32 PM Skelly Rd Construction (After New Receptors) ‐ Contra Costa County, Annual Date: 4/12/2022 1:35 PM Construction Schedule Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week Num Days
Demolition Demolition 10/11/2023 2/1/2024 5 82Site Preparation (site‐wide) Site preparation 10/11/2023 2/1/2024 5 82Grading (site‐wide) Grading 10/11/2023 12/6/2023 5 41Paving (roadways and foundations) Paving 12/1/2023 2/1/2024 5 45Building Construction (Model Homes) Building Construction 1/19/2024 2/1/2024 5 10Architectural Coating (pavement andmodel homes) Architectural Coating 1/19/2024 2/1/2024 5 10Building Construction (Pre receptors) Building Construction 2/2/2024 6/5/2024 5 89 Architectural Coating (Pre receptors) Architectural Coating 2/16/2024 6/5/2024 5 79 Building Construction (post
receptors) Building Construction 6/6/2024 10/30/2024 5 105 Architectural Coating (postreceptors) Architectural Coating 6/6/2024 10/30/2024 5 105 Calculations
Appendix
A Page 211
Trips and VMT Phase Name Total Trips
Worker Trip Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor
Trip Length
Hauling Trip
Length Vendor VehNum Days
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker
Trips
Vendor
Trips
Hauling
Trips
Worker
Trips Vendor Trips
Hauling
Trips
Demolition 5 0 224 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 82 410 0 224 4,428 0 4,480 142.50 0.00 659.30 Site Preparation (site‐wide) 3 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 82 246 0 0 2,657 0 0 85.50 0.00 0.00 Grading (site‐wide) 8 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 41 328 0 0 3,542 0 0 114.00 0.00 0.00 Paving (roadways and foundations) 8 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 45 360 0 0 3,888 0 0 125.12 0.00 0.00 Building Construction (Model
Homes) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 10 520 190 0 5,616 1,387 0 180.73 135.62 0.00Architectural Coating (pavement andmodel homes) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 10 100 0 0 1,080 0 0 34.76 0.00 0.00 Building Construction (Pre receptors) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 89 4,628 1,691 0 49,982 12,344 0 1,608.52 1,206.99 0.00 Architectural Coating (Pre receptors) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 79 790 0 0 8,532 0 0 274.57 0.00 0.00 Building Construction (post
receptors) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 105 5,460 1,995 0 58,968 14,564 0 1,897.69 1,423.98 0.00 Architectural Coating (post
receptors) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 105 1,050 0 0 11,340 0 0 364.94 0.00 0.00 On‐site Total Construction VMT (miles)
182,808
On‐Site Total Fuel Consumption (gallons)
8,254
Trips per Day Trips per Phase VMT per Phase Fuel Consumption (gallons) Appendix
A Page 212
Construction Vehicle Fuel Calculations
California Air Resource Board (ARB). 2022. EMFAC2017 Web Database. Website: https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissionsͲinventory/9d80a196ff7175eb01f2161f39e572013131647b. Accessed April 12, 2022 VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled
FE = Fuel Economy
Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emissions InventoryRegion Type: CountyRegion: Contra CostaCalendar Year: 2024Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel ConsumptionRegion CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel_Consumption FE VMT*FE (mi/day) (1000 gallons/day) (mi/gallon)
CONTRA COSTA 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2.5538992 326.0302982 51.09842 0.073466 4.437855443 1446.875334CONTRA COSTA 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5197.8222 628100.9399 54490.17 92.41798 6.79630661 4268766.57 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 415473.55 15421746.18 1949195 469.7434 32.83014843 506298216.1CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4583.4538 173065.8983 21477.78 3.441231 50.29185725 8703805.451 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 42903.228 1560070.346 196335.5 55.8014 27.9575489 43615742.98 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 23.39799 398.9985164 77.63046 0.016483 24.20605452 9658.179843CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 136800.1 5101359.876 635180.3 196.0618 26.01914803 132733037.7CONTRA COSTA 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 961.6321 40776.24302 4679.641 1.10959 36.748913 1498482.607CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 10141.215 353591.6844 151089 41.71301 8.476772663 2997316.324 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8597.3408 314852.4382 108143.7 17.12671 18.38370707 5788154.995 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1267.0063 45469.50058 18876.51 6.08917 7.467273689 339533.2054 CONTRA COSTA 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2958.1461 110401.0059 37209.76 6.718772 16.43172465 1814078.93 CONTRA COSTA 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 807.40555 45803.81966 16154.57 9.192351 4.982818755 228232.1317 CONTRA COSTA 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4601.6248 262908.2893 43927.33 26.81733 9.803671632 2577466.537 Worker
Sum of VMT*FE (Column BI) 692858943
Total VMT 22297417.54
Weighted Average FE 31.07350624
Vendor
Sum of VMT*FE (Column BI) 18014995.57
Total VMT 1761453.708
Weighted Average FE 10.22734545
Haul
Sum of VMT*FE (Column BI) 4270213.445
Total VMT 628426.9702
Weighted Average FE 6.795083037
Skelly Residential Project Construction Assumptions
OnͲsite Construction
Source: AQ/GHG Appendix, CalEEMod Output
Skelly Rd Construction (Before New Receptors)ͲContra Costa County, Annual Date: 4/12/2022 1:32 PM Skelly Rd Construction (After New Receptors)ͲContra Costa County, Annual Date: 4/12/2022 1:35 PM Construction Schedule Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week Num Days
Demolition Demolition 10/11/2023 2/1/2024 5 82Site Preparation (siteͲwide) Site preparation 10/11/2023 2/1/2024 5 82Grading (siteͲwide) Grading 10/11/2023 12/6/2023 5 41 Paving (roadways and foundations) Paving 12/1/2023 2/1/2024 5 45 Building Construction (Model
Homes) Building Construction 1/19/2024 2/1/2024 5 10
Architectural Coating (pavement and
model homes) Architectural Coating 1/19/2024 2/1/2024 5 10Building Construction (Pre receptors) Building Construction 2/2/2024 6/5/2024 5 89 Architectural Coating (Pre receptors) Architectural Coating 2/16/2024 6/5/2024 5 79 Building Construction (post
receptors) Building Construction 6/6/2024 10/30/2024 5 105Architectural Coating (postreceptors) Architectural Coating 6/6/2024 10/30/2024 5 105 Calculations
Appendix
A Page 213
Trips and VMT Phase Name Total Trips
Worker Trip Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor
Trip Length
Hauling Trip
Length Vendor VehNum Days
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker
Trips
Vendor
Trips
Hauling
Trips
Worker
Trips Vendor Trips
Hauling
Trips
Demolition 5 0 224 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 82 410 0 224 4,428 0 4,480 142.50 0.00 659.30Site Preparation (siteͲwide) 3 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 82 246 0 0 2,657 0 0 85.50 0.00 0.00 Grading (siteͲwide) 8 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 41 328 0 0 3,542 0 0 114.00 0.00 0.00 Paving (roadways and foundations) 8 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 45 360 0 0 3,888 0 0 125.12 0.00 0.00 Building Construction (Model
Homes) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 10 520 190 0 5,616 1,387 0 180.73 135.62 0.00Architectural Coating (pavement andmodel homes) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 10 100 0 0 1,080 0 0 34.76 0.00 0.00 Building Construction (Pre receptors) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 89 4,628 1,691 0 49,982 12,344 0 1,608.52 1,206.99 0.00Architectural Coating (Pre receptors) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 79 790 0 0 8,532 0 0 274.57 0.00 0.00Building Construction (post receptors) 52 19 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 105 5,460 1,995 0 58,968 14,564 0 1,897.69 1,423.98 0.00 Architectural Coating (post
receptors) 10 0 0 10.8 7.3 20 HDT_Mix 105 1,050 0 0 11,340 0 0 364.94 0.00 0.00 OnͲsite Total Construction VMT (miles)
182,808
OnͲSite Total Fuel Consumption (gallons)
8,254
Trips per Day Trips per Phase VMT per Phase Fuel Consumption (gallons) Appendix
A Page 214
Construction Office Electricity Calculation
Energy Appendix: CalEEMod Typical Construction Trailer
Typical Construction Trailer ‐ Contra Costa County, Annual Date: 4/11/2022 3:15 PM
kWh/yr = kilowatt hours per year
Energy by Land Use ‐ Electricity
Annual 8,669 kWh/yr
Total Over Construction 6,555 kWh
Total Construction Schedule
Start 10/11/2023
End 10/30/2024
Total Calendar Days 276
Consecutive workdays
only (no overlap)
Years 0.76
Appendix A Page 215
Proposed Operation Fuel Calculation
California Air Resource Board (ARB). 2022. EMFAC2017 Web Database. Website: https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissions‐inventory/9d80a196ff7175eb01f2161f39e572013131647b. Accessed April 12, 202EMFAC2014 (v1.0.7) Emissions Inventory VMT = Vehicle Miles TraveledRegion Type: County FE = Fuel EconomyRegion: San BernardinoCalendar Year: 2022Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel ConsumptionGivenRegion CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Fuel
Consumption FE VMT*FE
CONTRA COSTA 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2.62615587 352.571602 0.077413082 4.554419 1605.75876CONTRA COSTA 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 5369.96533 644008.096 93.32397156 6.900779 4444157.499CONTRA COSTA 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 424002.7 15638010.2 462.9054734 33.7823 528287902.6CONTRA COSTA 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4766.18285 178809.301 3.462298249 51.64468 9234549.959CONTRA COSTA 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 43486.3132 1574810.82 54.82710178 28.72322 45233635.29CONTRA COSTA 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 21.5405842 370.340918 0.014988569 24.70822 9150.466598CONTRA COSTA 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 138047.48 5107761.37 189.7404491 26.91973 137499549.2CONTRA COSTA 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1027.93047 42718.2348 1.131568761 37.75134 1612670.524CONTRA COSTA 2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 10022.0628 348469.314 40.60401777 8.582139 2990611.992CONTRA COSTA 2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 8682.76917 315653.419 16.91692909 18.65903 5889785.347CONTRA COSTA 2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1278.12814 45708.8071 6.040618746 7.566908 345874.3435CONTRA COSTA 2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 3036.82387 112130.337 6.721691715 16.68186 1870542.869CONTRA COSTA 2024 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20272.9721 150835.274 4.036357781 37.36915 5636586.525CONTRA COSTA 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 96641.9601 3343210.94 153.7335167 21.74679 72704115.9CONTRA COSTA 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 2405.86448 94971.4265 3.310076524 28.69161 2724883.185CONTRA COSTA 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1848.85436 16982.6047 3.409749877 4.980601 84583.58342CONTRA COSTA 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 796.078241 7171.6485 0.711608539 10.07808 72276.45449CONTRA COSTA 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 831.928497 47583.7346 9.361503464 5.082916 241864.1197CONTRA COSTA 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4761.34708 264391.325 26.65878724 9.917605 2622128.761CONTRA COSTA 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 293.333926 13840.1398 2.807456993 4.929778 68228.81691CONTRA COSTA 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 134.625537 10562.0349 1.278009258 8.264443 87289.33737CONTRA COSTA 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 68.2737846 3441.19612 0.34318331 10.02728 34505.84687CONTRA COSTA 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 960.261868 31547.4635 3.439132547 9.173087 289387.6406CONTRA COSTA 2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 25.281148 2468.69094 0.300432202 8.217132 20285.55832CONTRA COSTA 2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 188.434558 19045.969 2.882599841 6.607219 125840.8915 Vehicles
Sum of VMT*FE 822132012.4
Total VMT 28014855.22
Weighted Average FE 29.3462881 miles/gallon
Total VMTSource: AQ/GHG Appendix, CalEEMod Output
215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation ‐ Contra Costa County, Annua Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
Annual VMT
(miles)
Fuel
Consumption
Total VMT 871,184 29,686 gallons per year
Calculations
Appendix
A Page 216
Operation Natural Gas Use
Source: AQ/GHG Appendix, CalEEMod Output215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation ‐ Contra Costa County, Annual Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
kBTU/yr = kilo‐British Thermal Units/year
CF = cubic feet
Natural Gas Use
City Park 0Other Asphalt Surfaces 0
Parking Lot 0
Single Family Housing 1540000Total 1,540,000 kBTU/yr
Appendix
A Page 217
Operation Electricity Use
Source: AQ/GHG Appendix, CalEEMod Output215 Skelly Hercules Residential Project 2024 Operation ‐ Contra Costa County, Annual Date: 4/11/2022 1:42 PM
Project Electricity Use
kWh/yr = kilowatt hours per year
Electricity Use
Land Use (kWh/yr)City Park ‐19550Other Asphalt Surfaces ‐19550Parking Lot 2262 Single Family Housing 292871.1Total 256,033 kWh/yr
Appendix
A Page 218
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
Biological Resources Supporting Information
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
B.1 - Database Search Results
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Accipiter cooperii
Cooper's hawk
ABNKC12040 None None G5 S4 WL
Adela oplerella
Opler's longhorn moth
IILEE0G040 None None G2 S2
Agelaius tricolor
tricolored blackbird
ABPBXB0020 None Threatened G1G2 S1S2 SSC
Amorpha californica var. napensis
Napa false indigo
PDFAB08012 None None G4T2 S2 1B.2
Amsinckia lunaris
bent-flowered fiddleneck
PDBOR01070 None None G3 S3 1B.2
Andrena blennospermatis
Blennosperma vernal pool andrenid bee
IIHYM35030 None None G2 S2
Antrozous pallidus
pallid bat
AMACC10010 None None G4 S3 SSC
Aquila chrysaetos
golden eagle
ABNKC22010 None None G5 S3 FP
Archoplites interruptus
Sacramento perch
AFCQB07010 None None G2G3 S1 SSC
Arctostaphylos pallida
pallid manzanita
PDERI04110 Threatened Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
Ardea alba
great egret
ABNGA04040 None None G5 S4
Ardea herodias
great blue heron
ABNGA04010 None None G5 S4
Asio flammeus
short-eared owl
ABNSB13040 None None G5 S3 SSC
Astragalus tener var. tener
alkali milk-vetch
PDFAB0F8R1 None None G2T1 S1 1B.2
Athene cunicularia
burrowing owl
ABNSB10010 None None G4 S3 SSC
Balsamorhiza macrolepis
big-scale balsamroot
PDAST11061 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Blennosperma bakeri
Sonoma sunshine
PDAST1A010 Endangered Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
Blepharizonia plumosa
big tarplant
PDAST1C011 None None G1G2 S1S2 1B.1
Quad<span style='color:Red'> IS </span>(Mare Island (3812213)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Cordelia (3812222)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Briones Valley (3712282)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Richmond (3712283)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Benicia (3812212)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Petaluma Point (3812214)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Cuttings Wharf (3812223)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>Sears Point (3812224)<span style='color:Red'> OR </span>San Quentin (3712284))
Query Criteria:
Report Printed on Tuesday, April 12, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated April, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 6 Information Expires 10/1/2022
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Bombus caliginosus
obscure bumble bee
IIHYM24380 None None G2G3 S1S2
Bombus crotchii
Crotch bumble bee
IIHYM24480 None None G2 S1S2
Bombus occidentalis
western bumble bee
IIHYM24250 None None G2G3 S1
Branchinecta lynchi
vernal pool fairy shrimp
ICBRA03030 Threatened None G3 S3
Branta hutchinsii leucopareia
cackling (=Aleutian Canada) goose
ABNJB05035 Delisted None G5T3 S3 WL
Buteo regalis
ferruginous hawk
ABNKC19120 None None G4 S3S4 WL
Buteo swainsoni
Swainson's hawk
ABNKC19070 None Threatened G5 S3
Calochortus pulchellus
Mt. Diablo fairy-lantern
PMLIL0D160 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Calochortus tiburonensis
Tiburon mariposa-lily
PMLIL0D1C0 Threatened Threatened G1 S1 1B.1
Calystegia purpurata ssp. saxicola
coastal bluff morning-glory
PDCON040D2 None None G4T2T3 S2S3 1B.2
Carex lyngbyei
Lyngbye's sedge
PMCYP037Y0 None None G5 S3 2B.2
Castilleja affinis var. neglecta
Tiburon paintbrush
PDSCR0D013 Endangered Threatened G4G5T1T2 S1S2 1B.2
Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii
Congdon's tarplant
PDAST4R0P1 None None G3T1T2 S1S2 1B.1
Centromadia parryi ssp. parryi
pappose tarplant
PDAST4R0P2 None None G3T2 S2 1B.2
Charadrius nivosus nivosus
western snowy plover
ABNNB03031 Threatened None G3T3 S2 SSC
Chloropyron maritimum ssp. palustre
Point Reyes salty bird's-beak
PDSCR0J0C3 None None G4?T2 S2 1B.2
Chloropyron molle ssp. molle
soft salty bird's-beak
PDSCR0J0D2 Endangered Rare G2T1 S1 1B.2
Cicuta maculata var. bolanderi
Bolander's water-hemlock
PDAPI0M051 None None G5T4T5 S2? 2B.1
Circus hudsonius
northern harrier
ABNKC11011 None None G5 S3 SSC
Cirsium andrewsii
Franciscan thistle
PDAST2E050 None None G3 S3 1B.2
Coastal Brackish Marsh
Coastal Brackish Marsh
CTT52200CA None None G2 S2.1
Report Printed on Tuesday, April 12, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated April, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 of 6 Information Expires 10/1/2022
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Coastal Terrace Prairie
Coastal Terrace Prairie
CTT41100CA None None G2 S2.1
Corynorhinus townsendii
Townsend's big-eared bat
AMACC08010 None None G4 S2 SSC
Coturnicops noveboracensis
yellow rail
ABNME01010 None None G4 S1S2 SSC
Danaus plexippus pop. 1
monarch - California overwintering population
IILEPP2012 Candidate None G4T2T3 S2S3
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
valley elderberry longhorn beetle
IICOL48011 Threatened None G3T2T3 S3
Dipodomys heermanni berkeleyensis
Berkeley kangaroo rat
AMAFD03061 None None G4T1 S1
Dirca occidentalis
western leatherwood
PDTHY03010 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Downingia pusilla
dwarf downingia
PDCAM060C0 None None GU S2 2B.2
Egretta thula
snowy egret
ABNGA06030 None None G5 S4
Elanus leucurus
white-tailed kite
ABNKC06010 None None G5 S3S4 FP
Emys marmorata
western pond turtle
ARAAD02030 None None G3G4 S3 SSC
Eriogonum luteolum var. caninum
Tiburon buckwheat
PDPGN083S1 None None G5T2 S2 1B.2
Eryngium jepsonii
Jepson's coyote-thistle
PDAPI0Z130 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Extriplex joaquinana
San Joaquin spearscale
PDCHE041F3 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Falco peregrinus anatum
American peregrine falcon
ABNKD06071 Delisted Delisted G4T4 S3S4 FP
Fissidens pauperculus
minute pocket moss
NBMUS2W0U0 None None G3? S2 1B.2
Fritillaria liliacea
fragrant fritillary
PMLIL0V0C0 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
saltmarsh common yellowthroat
ABPBX1201A None None G5T3 S3 SSC
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
bald eagle
ABNKC10010 Delisted Endangered G5 S3 FP
Helianthella castanea
Diablo helianthella
PDAST4M020 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Helminthoglypta nickliniana bridgesi
Bridges' coast range shoulderband
IMGASC2362 None None G3T1 S1S2
Report Printed on Tuesday, April 12, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated April, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 3 of 6 Information Expires 10/1/2022
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Hesperolinon congestum
Marin western flax
PDLIN01060 Threatened Threatened G1 S1 1B.1
Hoita strobilina
Loma Prieta hoita
PDFAB5Z030 None None G2? S2? 1B.1
Holocarpha macradenia
Santa Cruz tarplant
PDAST4X020 Threatened Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian tern
ABNNM08020 None None G5 S4
Hypomesus transpacificus
Delta smelt
AFCHB01040 Threatened Endangered G1 S1
Isocoma arguta
Carquinez goldenbush
PDAST57050 None None G1 S1 1B.1
Lasionycteris noctivagans
silver-haired bat
AMACC02010 None None G3G4 S3S4
Lasiurus cinereus
hoary bat
AMACC05030 None None G3G4 S4
Lasthenia conjugens
Contra Costa goldfields
PDAST5L040 Endangered None G1 S1 1B.1
Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus
California black rail
ABNME03041 None Threatened G3T1 S1 FP
Lathyrus jepsonii var. jepsonii
Delta tule pea
PDFAB250D2 None None G5T2 S2 1B.2
Legenere limosa
legenere
PDCAM0C010 None None G2 S2 1B.1
Leptosiphon jepsonii
Jepson's leptosiphon
PDPLM09140 None None G2G3 S2S3 1B.2
Lilaeopsis masonii
Mason's lilaeopsis
PDAPI19030 None Rare G2 S2 1B.1
Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus
Alameda whipsnake
ARADB21031 Threatened Threatened G4T2 S2
Meconella oregana
Oregon meconella
PDPAP0G030 None None G2G3 S2 1B.1
Melospiza melodia maxillaris
Suisun song sparrow
ABPBXA301K None None G5T3 S3 SSC
Melospiza melodia pusillula
Alameda song sparrow
ABPBXA301S None None G5T2? S2S3 SSC
Melospiza melodia samuelis
San Pablo song sparrow
ABPBXA301W None None G5T2 S2 SSC
Microcina leei
Lee's micro-blind harvestman
ILARA47040 None None G1 S1
Microcina tiburona
Tiburon micro-blind harvestman
ILARA47060 None None G1 S2
Report Printed on Tuesday, April 12, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated April, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 4 of 6 Information Expires 10/1/2022
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Microtus californicus sanpabloensis
San Pablo vole
AMAFF11034 None None G5T1T2 S1S2 SSC
Nannopterum auritum
double-crested cormorant
ABNFD01020 None None G5 S4 WL
Neotoma fuscipes annectens
San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat
AMAFF08082 None None G5T2T3 S2S3 SSC
Northern Coastal Salt Marsh
Northern Coastal Salt Marsh
CTT52110CA None None G3 S3.2
Northern Maritime Chaparral
Northern Maritime Chaparral
CTT37C10CA None None G1 S1.2
Northern Vernal Pool
Northern Vernal Pool
CTT44100CA None None G2 S2.1
Nycticorax nycticorax
black-crowned night heron
ABNGA11010 None None G5 S4
Nyctinomops macrotis
big free-tailed bat
AMACD04020 None None G5 S3 SSC
Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 8
steelhead - central California coast DPS
AFCHA0209G Threatened None G5T2T3Q S2S3
Pandion haliaetus
osprey
ABNKC01010 None None G5 S4 WL
Pentachaeta bellidiflora
white-rayed pentachaeta
PDAST6X030 Endangered Endangered G1 S1 1B.1
Plagiobothrys glaber
hairless popcornflower
PDBOR0V0B0 None None GX SX 1A
Pogonichthys macrolepidotus
Sacramento splittail
AFCJB34020 None None GNR S3 SSC
Polygonum marinense
Marin knotweed
PDPGN0L1C0 None None G2Q S2 3.1
Rallus obsoletus obsoletus
California Ridgway's rail
ABNME05011 Endangered Endangered G3T1 S1 FP
Rana boylii
foothill yellow-legged frog
AAABH01050 None Endangered G3 S3 SSC
Rana draytonii
California red-legged frog
AAABH01022 Threatened None G2G3 S2S3 SSC
Reithrodontomys raviventris
salt-marsh harvest mouse
AMAFF02040 Endangered Endangered G1G2 S1S2 FP
Riparia riparia
bank swallow
ABPAU08010 None Threatened G5 S2
Senecio aphanactis
chaparral ragwort
PDAST8H060 None None G3 S2 2B.2
Serpentine Bunchgrass
Serpentine Bunchgrass
CTT42130CA None None G2 S2.2
Report Printed on Tuesday, April 12, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated April, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 5 of 6 Information Expires 10/1/2022
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
Species Element Code Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Sorex ornatus sinuosus
Suisun shrew
AMABA01103 None None G5T1T2Q S1S2 SSC
Sorex vagrans halicoetes
salt-marsh wandering shrew
AMABA01071 None None G5T1 S1 SSC
Spergularia macrotheca var. longistyla
long-styled sand-spurrey
PDCAR0W062 None None G5T2 S2 1B.2
Speyeria callippe callippe
callippe silverspot butterfly
IILEPJ6091 Endangered None G5T1 S1
Speyeria zerene sonomensis
Sonoma zerene fritillary
IILEPJ6083 None None G5T1 S1
Spirinchus thaleichthys
longfin smelt
AFCHB03010 Candidate Threatened G5 S1
Streptanthus glandulosus ssp. niger
Tiburon jewelflower
PDBRA2G0T0 Endangered Endangered G4T1 S1 1B.1
Suaeda californica
California seablite
PDCHE0P020 Endangered None G1 S1 1B.1
Symphyotrichum lentum
Suisun Marsh aster
PDASTE8470 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Syncaris pacifica
California freshwater shrimp
ICMAL27010 Endangered Endangered G2 S2
Taxidea taxus
American badger
AMAJF04010 None None G5 S3 SSC
Thaleichthys pacificus
eulachon
AFCHB04010 Threatened None G5 S2
Trifolium amoenum
two-fork clover
PDFAB40040 Endangered None G1 S1 1B.1
Trifolium hydrophilum
saline clover
PDFAB400R5 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Triquetrella californica
coastal triquetrella
NBMUS7S010 None None G2 S2 1B.2
Tryonia imitator
mimic tryonia (=California brackishwater snail)
IMGASJ7040 None None G2 S2
Valley Needlegrass Grassland
Valley Needlegrass Grassland
CTT42110CA None None G3 S3.1
Viburnum ellipticum
oval-leaved viburnum
PDCPR07080 None None G4G5 S3? 2B.3
Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus
yellow-headed blackbird
ABPBXB3010 None None G5 S3 SSC
Record Count: 121
Report Printed on Tuesday, April 12, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated April, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 6 of 6 Information Expires 10/1/2022
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
4/12/22, 8:31 AM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory | Search Results https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&crpr=1A:1B:2A:2B:3&fesa=FE:FT:FC&cesa=CE:CT:CR:CE:CT&fsao=or&qsl=9&quad=3812222:3712282:3712283:3812212:3812213:3812214:3812223:3812224:3712… 1/2 Search Results
CNPS Rare Plant Inventory
13 matches found. Click on scientific name for details
Search Criteria: CRPR is one of [1A:1B:2A:2B:3] Fed List is one of [FE:FT:FC] or State List is one of [CE:CT:CR:CE:CT] , 9-Quad include [3812222:3712282:3712283:3812212:3812213:3812214:3812223:3812224:3712284] ▲ SCIENTIFIC
NAME
COMMON
NAME FAMILY LIFEFORM
BLOOMING
PERIOD
FED
LIST
STATE
LIST
GLOBAL
RANK
STATE
RANK
CA RARE
PLANT
RANK PHOTO
Arctostaphylos
pallida
pallid
manzanita
Ericaceae perennial
evergreen shrub
Dec-Mar FT CE G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo
Available
Blennosperma
bakeri
Sonoma
sunshine
Asteraceae annual herb Mar-May FE CE G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo
Available
Calochortus
tiburonensis
Tiburon
mariposa-lily
Liliaceae perennial
bulbiferous herb
Mar-Jun FT CT G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo
Available
Castilleja affinis
var. neglecta
Tiburon
paintbrush
Orobanchaceae perennial herb
(hemiparasitic)
Apr-Jun FE CT G4G5T1T2 S1S2 1B.2
No Photo
Available
Chloropyron
molle ssp. molle
soft salty
bird's-beak
Orobanchaceae annual herb
(hemiparasitic)
Jun-Nov FE CR G2T1 S1 1B.2
No Photo
Available
Hesperolinon
congestum
Marin western
flax
Linaceae annual herb Apr-Jul FT CT G1 S1 1B.1
© 2009
Neal Kramer
Holocarpha
macradenia
Santa Cruz
tarplant
Asteraceae annual herb Jun-Oct FT CE G1 S1 1B.1
© 2011
Dylan
Neubauer
Lasthenia
conjugens
Contra Costa
goldfields
Asteraceae annual herb Mar-Jun FE None G1 S1 1B.1
© 2013
Neal Kramer
Lilaeopsis masonii Mason's
lilaeopsis
Apiaceae perennial
rhizomatous
herb
Apr-Nov None CR G2 S2 1B.1
No Photo
Available
Pentachaeta
bellidiflora
white-rayed
pentachaeta
Asteraceae annual herb Mar-May FE CE G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo
Available
Streptanthus
glandulosus ssp.
niger
Tiburon
jewelflower
Brassicaceae annual herb May-Jun FE CE G4T1 S1 1B.1
No Photo
Available
4/12/22, 8:31 AM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory | Search Results https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&crpr=1A:1B:2A:2B:3&fesa=FE:FT:FC&cesa=CE:CT:CR:CE:CT&fsao=or&qsl=9&quad=3812222:3712282:3712283:3812212:3812213:3812214:3812223:3812224:3712… 2/2 Suaeda californica California
seablite
Chenopodiaceae perennial
evergreen shrub
Jul-Oct FE None G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo
Available
Trifolium
amoenum
two-fork
clover
Fabaceae annual herb Apr-Jun FE None G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo
Available
Showing 1 to 13 of 13 entries
Suggested Citation:
California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2022. Rare Plant Inventory (online edition, v9-01 1.5). Website https://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed 12 April 2022].
CONTACT US
Send questions and comments
to [email protected].
ABOUT THIS WEBSITE
About the Inventory
Release Notes
Advanced Search
Glossary
ABOUT CNPS
About the Rare Plant Program
CNPS Home Page
About CNPS
Join CNPS
CONTRIBUTORS
The Calflora Database
The California Lichen Society
California Natural Diversity
Database
The Jepson Flora Project
The Consortium of California
Herbaria
CalPhotos
Copyright © 2010-2022 California Native Plant Society. All rights reserved. 4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 1/15 IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Contra Costa County, California
Map of project location
Local office
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
(916) 414-6600
(916) 414-6713
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 2/15 Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
1 2
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 3/15 Birds
Reptiles
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse Reithrodontomys raviventris
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/613
Endangered
NAME STATUS
California Clapper Rail Rallus longirostris obsoletus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4240
Endangered
California Least Tern Sterna antillarum browni
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8104
Endangered
Northern Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis caurina
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1123
Threatened
Western Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosus nivosus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8035
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Alameda Whipsnake (=striped Racer) Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5524
Threatened
NAME STATUS
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 4/15 Fishes
Insects
Crustaceans
Flowering Plants
California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2891
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Delta Smelt Hypomesus transpacificus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/321
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
NAME STATUS
California Freshwater Shrimp Syncaris pacifica
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7903
Endangered
Conservancy Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta conservatio
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8246
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Contra Costa Goldfields Lasthenia conjugens
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7058
Endangered
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 5/15 Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird Soft Bird's-beak Cordylanthus mollis ssp. mollis
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8541
Endangered
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf 1 2
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 6/15 species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Allen's Hummingbird Selasphorus sasin
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9637
Breeds Feb 1 to Jul 15
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
Black Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9591
Breeds Apr 15 to Oct 31
Black Turnstone Arenaria melanocephala
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds elsewhere
California Thrasher Toxostoma redivivum
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Jan 1 to Jul 31
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 7/15 Clark's Grebe Aechmophorus clarkii
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 31
Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2084
Breeds May 20 to Jul 31
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
Lawrence's Goldfinch Carduelis lawrencei
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9464
Breeds Mar 20 to Sep 20
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9481
Breeds elsewhere
Nuttall's Woodpecker Picoides nuttallii
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9410
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 20
Oak Titmouse Baeolophus inornatus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9656
Breeds Mar 15 to Jul 15
Olive-sided Flycatcher Contopus cooperi
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3914
Breeds May 20 to Aug 31
Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480
Breeds elsewhere
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 8/15 Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Willet Tringa semipalmata
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds elsewhere
Wrentit Chamaea fasciata
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 10
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 9/15 probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Allen's
Hummingbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable (This is
not a Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) in
this area, but
warrants attention
because of the
Eagle Act or for
potential
susceptibilities in
offshore areas
from certain types
of development or
activities.)
Black
Oystercatcher
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 10/15 Black Turnstone
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
California Thrasher
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Clark's Grebe
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Common
Yellowthroat
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) only
in particular Bird
Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
USA)
Golden Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable (This is
not a Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) in
this area, but
warrants attention
because of the
Eagle Act or for
potential
susceptibilities in
offshore areas
from certain types
of development or
activities.)
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 11/15 Lawrence's
Goldfinch
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Marbled Godwit
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Nuttall's
Woodpecker
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) only
in particular Bird
Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
USA)
Oak Titmouse
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Olive-sided
Flycatcher
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 12/15 Short-billed
Dowitcher
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Willet
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Wrentit
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 13/15 Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 14/15 What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. 4/12/22, 8:39 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/H6ZGWVYLTZGFLLX2W2MFPOYRMI/resources 15/15 For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
B.2 - Biological Resources Analysis Report
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS REPORT
FOR THE
SKELLY PROPERTY
CITY OF HERCULES, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
D.R. HORTON
6683 Owens Drive
Pleasanton, California 94588
Prepared by:
OLBERDING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Wetland Regulatory Consultants
3170 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 260
San Ramon, California 94583
Phone: (925) 866-2111 ~ Fax: (925) 866-2126
E-mail: [email protected]
Contact: Jeff Olberding
MARCH 2022 (Amended)
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 3
2.0 LOCATION.......................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION............................................................................................... 3
4.0 REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................................. 5
4.1 Federal Regulatory Setting................................................................................................... 5
4.1.1 Plants and Wildlife ........................................................................................... 5
4.1.2 Wetlands/Waters............................................................................................... 5
4.1.3 Migratory Bird Treaty Act................................................................................ 8
4.1.4 Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act................................................ 8
4.2 State Regulatory Setting....................................................................................................... 9
4.2.1 Plants and Wildlife ........................................................................................... 9
4.2.2 Wetlands/Waters ............................................................................................. 10
4.2.3 California Environmental Quality Act............................................................ 10
4.2.4 City of Hercules Municipal Code ................................................................... 11
5.0 METHODS OF ANALYSIS FOR GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................ 12
5.1 Soils Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 14
5.2 Plant Survey Methods ........................................................................................................ 14
5.2.1 Review of Literature and Data Sources .......................................................... 14
5.2.2 Field Surveys .................................................................................................. 14
5.3 Wildlife Survey Methods ................................................................................................... 15
5.3.1 Review of Literature and Data Sources .......................................................... 15
5.3.2 Field Surveys .................................................................................................. 15
6.0 RESULTS FOR GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................. 16
6.1 Soil Evaluation Results ...................................................................................................... 16
6.2 Plant Survey Results ........................................................................................................... 17
6.2.1 Floristic Inventory and Habitat Characterization ........................................... 17
6.3 Wildlife Survey Results ...................................................................................................... 21
6.3.1 General Wildlife Species and Habitats ........................................................... 21
7.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 29
7.1 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................. 29
7.2 Special-status Plants ........................................................................................................... 30
7.3 Special-status Wildlife ....................................................................................................... 30
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 30
9.0 LITERATURE CITED ....................................................................................................... 34 iii
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1 FIGURES
Figure 1 Regional Map
Figure 2 Vicinity Map
Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 4 Aerial Map
Figure 5 CNDDB Wildlife Occurrences within 5 miles
Figure 6 CNDDB Plant Occurrences within 5 miles
Figure 7 USFWS Critical Habitat
Figure 8 Soils Map
Figure 9 Photo Location Map
Figure 10 Habitat Map
ATTACHMENT 2 TABLES
Table 1 Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Within/Adjacent to the Survey Area
Table 2 Special-Status Species Occurring Within/Adjacent to the Survey Area
ATTACHMENT 3 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
This report should be cited as: Olberding Environmental, Inc. March 2022. Biological Resources Analysis Report for the Skelly Property, City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California. Prepared for D.R. Horton, Pleasanton, California.
1 SUMMARY
On November 11, 2020, Olberding Environmental, Inc. conducted a field reconnaissance survey of the Skelly Property (Property) for the purpose of identifying sensitive plant and wildlife species, sensitive habitats, and biological constraints potentially occurring on the Property. The Property surveyed is comprised of approximately 7.49 acres located in the City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California.
Results of the reconnaissance survey identified a small drainage feature at the southern portion of the property and two isolated seasonal wetlands that had developed in shallow topographical depressions associated with a horse paddock along the northern boundary. It was determined that these wetlands/waters might be considered jurisdictional by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and/or the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). A jurisdictional delineation was prepared and presented to the Corps for verification purposes. Following an onsite verification, the Corps concluded that the perennial drainage was a jurisdiction feature. However, the two seasonal wetlands Were determined to be non-jurisdictional by the Corps due to their isolation and lack of connectivity to jurisdictional waters. Both the perennial drainage and the isolated wetlands qualify as jurisdictional “Waters of the State” by the RWQCB. The CDFW would have jurisdiction over the perennial drainage.
The proposed project would incorporate project design features to avoid the two seasonal wetlands. These design features include the creation of a bio retention basin surrounding the isolated wetlands with a 5-foot setback buffer to avoid impacts to the wetlands. Additionally, treated stormwater runoff water would be directed to the isolated wetlands from the retention basin, augmenting hydrology to support the functions and values being provided by the wetland habitat. The project will avoid the perennial drainage area entirely. There are no anticipated impacts to either the perennial drainage or the two seasonal wetlands. As such, no Corps, CDFW or RWQCB permits will be required.
A query of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) showed that thirteen specialstatus plant species have been recorded within a 5-mile radius of the Property. Eleven species were identified as having no potential to occur on the Property, based on the absence of suitable habitat, soil composition, and the development and disturbance of the Property. Suitable habitats for these species include vernal pool, serpentine environments, chaparral, broad-leafed upland forest, cismontane woodlands, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, freshwater wetland, brackish or freshwater marsh, none of which are found on the Property. Two plants, Diablo helianthella (Helianthella castanea) and Santa Cruz tarplant (Holocarpha macradenia) were both found to have marginally suitable habitat within the Property due to the presence of riparian woodland and grassland habitat with clay soils; however, it was determined that both species are not likely to occur on the Property due to the development and high level of disturbance historically to the 2 site through livestock activities such as grazing. In addition to the disturbance to the Property, the lack of nearby extant occurrences of Santa Cruz tarplant also made it unlikely that this species would occur onsite. For these reasons, a rare plant survey is not needed.
A total of four avian species were identified to have a high potential to occur on the Property.
The red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus), Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii), and white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus) all have a high potential to occur in both a foraging and nesting capacity. The red-tailed hawk was the only raptor observed foraging on or near the Property during the time of the survey. If project construction-related activities such as vegetation removal or grading take place during the nesting season (February through August), preconstruction surveys for nesting passerine birds and raptors are recommended.
No sign of bat use was observed on the Property during the November 2020 survey; however, based on habitat suitability, it was determined that bats have a moderate to high potential to utilize the site in a roosting and foraging capacity. These bat species include pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii), silver-haired bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans), and Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis). If project construction-related activities such as tree removal or the removal of the existing structures take place it is recommended that a bat habitat assessment is conducted by a qualified bat biologist during seasonal periods of bat activity to determine suitability of the onsite habitat. If special-status bat species are discovered, construction activities may be timed to minimize impacts and additional mitigation may be required.
CNDDB listed 8 occurrences of California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) in the 5-mile radius of the Property. The potential seasonal wetland and perennial drainage on the Property do not provide suitable breeding habitat within the site. The Property contains suitable dispersal corridors and foraging habitat for CRLF; however, the closest occurrence of CRLF to the Property is approximately 1.5 miles east of the Property outside of the known 1-mile dispersal distance and separated by extensive residential development and Interstate 80. USFWS designated CRLF critical habitat is recorded 3.5 miles southeast of the Property, and the majority of the CNDDB occurrences are recorded in this region. For these reasons, CRLF has a low potential to occur on the Property and is not likely to occur.
The monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) was identified as having a moderate potential to overwinter on the Property. Monarchs generally overwinter beginning in September or October.
If project construction-related activities such as tree and vegetation removal take place during the overwintering season, preconstruction surveys for monarch butterfly are recommended during the months of September or October.
3 1.0 INTRODUCTION
Olberding Environmental, Inc. has conducted a biological resources analysis (biological constraints assessment) of the Skelly Property, located in the City of Hercules in Contra Costa County, California. This biological resources analysis included a review of pertinent literature on relevant background information and habitat characteristics of the site. Our review included researching existing information in the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) maintained by the CDFW and the California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Also included was a review of information related to species of plants and animals that could potentially utilize the described habitats identified on and immediately surrounding the Property. To assist in the assessment, a field reconnaissance investigation of the Property was conducted on November 11, 2020. This report documents the methods, results, and conclusions for the reconnaissance-level survey associated with the biological resources analysis for the Property.
2.0 LOCATION
The Property is located west of Interstate 80, and directly north of San Pablo Avenue in the city of Hercules, within Contra Costa County, California. Attachment 1, Figure 1 depicts the regional location of the Property in Contra Costa County, and Attachment 1, Figure 2 illustrates the vicinity of the Property in relationship to the City of Hercules. Attachment 1, Figure 3 identifies the location of the Property on the USGS 7.5 Quadrangle Map for Mare Island. An aerial photograph of the Property has been included as Attachment 1, Figure 4.
Access to the Property is provided from Highway 4. Traveling west on Highway 4, turn left onto San Pablo Avenue. Continue on San Pablo Avenue for 0.8 miles, and then take a right onto Hercules Avenue. Continue on Hercules Avenue for 0.2 miles, and then take a left onto Skelly.
Continue on Skelly for 0.2 miles and the Property will be at the terminus of the road.
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Property encompasses approximately 7.49 acres in a roughly rectangular shape, bounded on all sides by residential housing. A concrete v-ditch approximately two feet wide lies along the north, east, and western perimeter of the site, outside of the Property boundary. This feature did not contain water during the time of the survey and was surrounded by ruderal grassland and eucalyptus woodland habitat and lined with native and ornamental trees which separate the Property from the adjacent residential housing. To the south of the Property lies railroad tracks and the Pinole Senior Center, and to the west, a public walking trail separates the Property from the adjacent Pinole Creek. The Property supports six habitat types: developed, ruderal grassland, perennial drainage, riparian woodland, eucalyptus woodland, and seasonal wetland habitat (Attachment 1, Figure 10).
4 The Property was previously a residence that contained numerous barns and paddocks for housing horses and other livestock. The Property still contains the residence and many of the barn structures, paddocks, and outbuildings, all of which are vacant. An asphalt and gravel driveway associated with the residence is present throughout the northeast corner of the Property, and remnants of old farm equipment and vehicles are found throughout the Property. Several large blue gum eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus globulus) surround the driveway to the residence and many of the horse stalls on the Property. The residence and vacant structures are surrounded by ornamental vegetation and trees such as English ivy (Hedera helix), date palm (Phoenix sp.), olive (Olea europaea), pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana), English walnut (Juglans regius), blue gum eucalyptus, and Peruvian peppertree (Schinus molle). In addition to these structures, the Property contains a water storage tank located in the southwestern portion of the site, and a cell tower and associated utilities located in the southeastern corner of the Property.
Much of the ruderal grassland habitat throughout the site is located in areas once used as paddocks, and these locations have been regularly disturbed for over twenty years through both grazing and livestock activity as observed through analysis of aerial imagery (Google Earth 2020). The majority of the ruderal grassland habitat has been disked recently, with patches of ruderal vegetation scattered throughout, and concentrated along the margins of the habitat. The remaining vegetation is dominated by wild oat (Avena fatua), barbed wild oat (Avena barbata), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), bristly ox-tongue (Helminthotheca echioides), soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus), and a mix of other non-native species.
A perennial drainage feature is found along the southern boundary of the site, and enters from the southeastern corner, flowing west and exiting the Property via a culvert near the southwestern corner. This feature was surrounded by a mix of native and non-native riparian vegetation such as English walnut, eucalyptus, Himalayan black berry (Rubus armeniacus), northern California black walnut (Juglans hindsii), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), and Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra). This feature contained water throughout much of its length and had a defined bed and bank.
Two seasonal wetlands were located along the northern boundary of the Property adjacent to an old horse stall and paddock. Dominant species include common plantain (Plantago major), annual beard grass (Polypogon monspeliensis), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), and bristly oxtongue.
The topography of the Property is relatively flat with a gentle slope near the southeastern corner, and ranges between 9 feet above sea level at the northwestern boundary and 53 feet above sea level near the southeastern boundary.
5 4.0 REGULATORY SETTING
4.1 Federal Regulatory Setting
4.1.1 Plants and Wildlife
The federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531 et seq., as amended) prohibits federal agencies from authorizing, permitting, or funding any action that would result in biological jeopardy to a plant or animal species listed as Threatened or Endangered under the Act. Listed species are taxa for which proposed and final rules have been published in the Federal Register (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] 2020). If a proposed project may jeopardize listed species, Section 7 of the ESA requires consideration of those species through formal consultations with the USFWS. Federal Proposed species (USFWS, 2019) are species for which a proposed listing as Threatened or Endangered under ESA has been published in the Federal Register. If a proposed project may jeopardize proposed species, Section 7 of the ESA affords consideration of those species through informal conferences with USFWS. The USFWS defines federal Candidate species as “those taxa for which we have on file sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support issuance of a proposed rule to list, but issuance of the proposed rule is precluded by other higher priority listing actions” (USFWS, 2019).
Federal Candidate species are not afforded formal protection, although USFWS encourages other federal agencies to give consideration to Candidate species in environmental planning.
4.1.2 Wetlands/Waters
The federal government, acting through the Corps and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has jurisdiction over all “waters of the United States” as authorized by §404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 CFR Parts 320-330).
Properties that cause the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States require permitting by the Corps. Actions affecting small areas of jurisdictional waters of the United States may qualify for a Nationwide Permit (NWP), provided conditions of the permit are met, such as avoiding impacts to threatened or endangered species or to important cultural sites.
Properties that affect larger areas or which do not meet the conditions of an NWP require an Individual Permit. The process for obtaining an Individual Permit requires a detailed alternatives analysis and development of a comprehensive mitigation/monitoring plan.
On January 23, 2020 the EPA and the Corps enacted the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR) to redefine “waters of the United States” to include four categories. Their landward extent was defined following the definitions provided in the Corps of Engineers regulations [33 CFR §328.3]:
6 (a) Jurisdictional waters. The Clean Water Act defines “waters of the United States” as:
(1) The territorial seas, and waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
(2) Tributaries;
(3) Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters; and (4) Adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands are transitional habitats between upland terrestrial areas and deeper aquatic habitats such as rivers and lakes. Adjacent wetlands are wetlands that abut, meaning to touch at least at one point or side of, jurisdictional waters or are inundated by flooding from jurisdictional waters in a typical year (33 CFR Section 328 (c)(1)). Under federal regulation, wetlands are defined as “those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal conditions do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions” (33 CFR Section 328 (c)(16)).
Swamps, marshes, bogs, fens, and estuaries are all defined as wetlands, as are seasonally saturated or inundated areas such as vernal pools, alkali wetlands, seeps, and springs. In addition, portions of the riparian habitat along a river or stream may be a wetland where the riparian vegetation is at or below the ordinary high-water mark and thus also meets the wetland hydrology and hydric soil criteria.
Navigable waters include all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tides, including the open ocean, tidal bays, and tidal sloughs. Navigable waters also include some large, non-tidal rivers and lakes, which are important for transportation in commerce. The jurisdictional limit over navigable waters extends laterally to the entire water surface and bed of the waterbody landward to the limits of the mean high tide line. For non-tidal rivers or lakes, which have been designated (by the Corps) to be navigable waters, the limit of jurisdiction along the shoreline is defined by the ordinary high-water mark. Ordinary high-water mark is that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas (33 CFR Section 328(c)(7)). The Corps regulates other waters to the outward limit of the ordinary high-water mark. Streams should exhibit a defined channel, bed and banks to be delineated as other waters.
The 2020 NWPR defines non-jurisdiction waters as:
(1) Waters or water features that are not identified in (a)(1) through (4) above; 7 (2) Groundwater, including groundwater drainage through subsurface drainage systems;
(3) Ephemeral features, including ephemeral streams, swales, gullies, rills, and pools; (4) Diffuse stormwater run-off and direction sheet flow over upland; (5) Ditches that are not territorial seas or traditional navigable waters, or tributaries, and those portions constructed in adjacent wetlands that do not satisfy the conditions of adjacent wetlands;
(6) Prior converted cropland;
(7) Artificially irrigated areas, including fields flooded for agricultural production, that would revert to upland should application of irrigation water to that area cease;
(8) Artificial lakes and ponds, including water storage reservoirs and farm, irrigation, stock watering, and clog cleaning ponds, constructed of excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters, so long as those artificial lakes and ponds are not impoundments of jurisdictional waters that meet the conditions of lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters;
(9) Water-filled depressions constructed or excavated in upland or in nonjurisdictional waters incidental to mining or construction activity, and pits excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters for the purpose of obtaining fill, sand, or gravel;
(10) Stormwater control features constructed of excavated in upland or in nonjurisdictional waters to convey, treat, infiltrate, or store stormwater run-off; (11) Groundwater recharge, water reuse, and wastewater recycling structures, including detention, retention, and infiltrations basins and ponds, constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters; and (12) Waste treatment systems.
However, the preamble also states “the Corps reserves the right on a case-by-case basis to determine that a particular waterbody within these categories” can be regulated as jurisdictional water. The EPA also has authority to determine jurisdictional waters of the U.S. on a case-bycase basis. Riparian habitat that is above the ordinary high-water mark and does not meet the three-parameter criteria for a wetland would not be regulated as jurisdictional waters of the United States, but is regulated by CDFW.
8 4.1.3 Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Raptors are migratory bird species protected by international treaty under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703-711). The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 CFR. Part 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 CFR 21). Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. Implementation of the take provisions requires that Property-related disturbance at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during critical phases of the nesting cycle (generally February 1 – September 1, annually). Disturbance that causes nest abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort (e.g., killing or abandonment of eggs or young) or the loss of habitat upon which the birds depend, is considered “taking” and is potentially punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. Such taking would also violate federal law protecting migratory birds (e.g., MBTA).
4.1.4 Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
In addition to protection under the MBTA, both the bald eagle and the golden eagle are also protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668-668c). The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and amended several times since being enacted in 1940, prohibits anyone, without a permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior, from “taking” bald or golden eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs (USFWS 2007). The Act provides criminal penalties for persons who “take, possess, sell, purchase, barter, offer to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, at any time or any manner, any bald eagle ... [or any golden eagle], alive or dead, or any part, nest, or egg thereof.” The Act defines “take” as “pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb” (USFWS 2007).
For purposes of these guidelines, “disturb” means: “to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, 1) injury to an eagle, 2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or 3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior” (USFWS 2007).
In addition to immediate impacts, this definition also covers impacts that result from humaninduced alterations initiated around a previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not present, if, upon the eagle’s return, such alterations agitate or bother an eagle to a degree that interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, and causes injury, death or nest abandonment (USFWS 2007).
9 4.2 State Regulatory Setting
4.2.1 Plants and Wildlife
Property permitting and approval requires compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the 1984 California Endangered Species Act (CESA), and the 1977 Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA). The CESA and NPPA authorize the California Fish and Game Commission to designate Endangered, Threatened and Rare species and to regulate the taking of these species (§§2050-2098, Fish & Game Code). The California Code of Regulations (Title 14, §670.5) lists animal species considered Endangered or Threatened by the State.
The Natural Heritage Division of the CDFW administers the state rare species program. The CDFW maintains lists of designated Endangered, Threatened, and Rare plant and animal species (CDFW 2020b and 2019). Listed species either were designated under the NPPA or designated by the Fish and Game Commission. In addition to recognizing three levels of endangerment, the CDFW can afford interim protection to candidate species while they are being reviewed by the Fish and Game Commission.
The CDFW also maintains a list of animal species of special concern (CDFW 2019), most of which are species whose breeding populations in California may face extirpation. Although these species have no legal status, the CDFW recommends considering them during analysis of proposed property impacts to protect declining populations and avoid the need to list them as endangered in the future.
Under provisions of §15380(d) of the CEQA Guidelines, the CEQA lead agency and CDFW, in making a determination of significance, must treat non-listed plant and animal species as equivalent to listed species if such species satisfy the minimum biological criteria for listing. In general, the CDFW considers plant species on List 1A (Plants Presumed Extinct in California), List 1B (Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and elsewhere), or List 2 (Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, But More Common Elsewhere) of the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (Skinner and Pavlik 1994) as qualifying for legal protection under §15380(d). Species on CNPS Lists 3 or 4 may, but generally do not, qualify for protection under this provision.
Sensitive habitats include riparian corridors, wetlands, habitats for legally protected species and CDFW Species of Special Concern, areas of high biological diversity, areas providing important wildlife habitat, and unusual or regionally restricted habitat types. Habitat types considered sensitive include those listed on the CNDDB working list of “high priority” habitats (i.e., those habitats that are rare or endangered within the borders of California) (Holland 1986). 10 4.2.2 Wetlands/Waters
The RWQCB regulates activities in wetlands and other waters through §401 of the Clean Water Act. Section 401 requires a state water quality certification for properties subject to 404 regulations. Requirements of the certification include mitigation for loss of wetland habitat. In the San Francisco Bay region, the RWQCB may identify additional wetland mitigation beyond the mitigation required by the Corps. California Fish and Game Code §§1600-1607 require the CDFW be notified of any activity that could affect the bank or bed of any stream that has value to fish and wildlife. Upon notification, the CDFW has the discretion to execute a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The CDFW defines a stream as follows:
“... a body of water that flows at least periodically...through a bed or channel having banks and supporting fish and other aquatic life. This includes watercourses having a subsurface flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation.” (Source: Streambed Alteration Program, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2016).
In practice, CDFW authority is extended to any “blue line” stream shown on a USGS topographic map, as well as unmapped channels with a definable bank and bed. Wetlands, as defined by the Corps, need not be present for CDFW to exert authority.
4.2.3 California Environmental Quality Act
According to Appendix G of the CEQA (CEQA 2020) Guidelines, a proposed project would have a significant impact on biological resources if it would:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW and USFWS? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the CDFW or USFWS?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
11 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
4.2.4 City of Hercules Municipal Code
According to the City of Hercules Municipal Code, Title 4. Public Welfare, Morals, and Conduct, the removal of mature trees is prohibited from any undeveloped or partially developed property, whether public or private, within the City of Hercules for any reason. Some exceptions apply (Ord. 331 § 1 (part), 1996).
Definitions for the above terms:
(a) “Mature tree” includes any living tree with a trunk diameter measuring twelve (12) inches or greater when measured at “breast height,” which is roughly four and one-half (4-1/2) feet above the surface of the ground.
(b) “Tree removal” shall include any one or more of the following:
(1) Complete removal of a mature tree.
(2) Any action foreseeably leading to the death of a mature tree or permanent damage to its health.
(3) Removal of more than one-third (1/3) of the foliage of a mature tree, except where such removal of foliage is necessary for periodic maintenance appropriate to the particular tree species in question.
(c) “Undeveloped or partially developed property” includes all properties which are available for future development or redevelopment but does not include developed residential or nonresidential properties. (Ord. 331 § 1 (part), 1996) Exemptions to the above municipal code are as follows:
Section 4-15.04
(a) If a mature tree poses an immediate and substantial threat to the safety of persons or property, the property owner may contact the Public Works Director and request approval to remove the tree. After consultation with the City Manager if at all possible, the Public Works Director shall confirm that an emergency situation exists. The Public Works 12 Director may then authorize removal. The Public Works Director may consult with a certified arborist if deemed necessary to confirm the necessity for tree removal. The removal of a mature tree under emergency conditions with approval by the Public Works Director shall be reported to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting (4-15.04).
Section 4-15.05 Tree Removal In Conjunction with Development Mature trees may be removed in conjunction with development projects for which the City has issued all necessary land use approvals, provided however, that the City approves, and the developer implements a tree replacement plan. In addition, mature trees may be removed in conjunction with development projects for which the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and/or the California Department of Fish and Game has issued a permit, provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) The property owner has obtained and is in compliance with a Grading Permit and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan pursuant to Chapter 7-2 of this Code; (b) The City has approved and the property owner is implementing a tree replacement plan as part of an environmental mitigation program approved by the applicable state or federal agency; and
(c) The proposed pre-development activities are consistent with the City’s General Plan, as determined by the Community and Business Development Director. (Ord. 331 § 1 (part), 1996)
Violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter or the knowing or intentional misrepresentation to any officer or employee of the City of any material fact when requesting tree removal under Sections 4-15.04 or 4-15.05 shall constitute a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 331 § 1 (part), 1996).
5.0 METHODS OF ANALYSIS FOR GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES A special-status plant and wildlife species database search and review was conducted using the CNDDB and other sources. An additional search was conducted for special-status plants using CNPS Inventory on-line. Special-status species reports were accessed by searching the CNDDB database for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles which surround the Property, and by examining those species that have been identified in the vicinity of the Property. These quadrangles will be henceforth noted as surrounding quads. The database report identified special-status species known to occur in the region or those that have the potential to 13 occur in the vicinity of the Property. The CNDDB report was used to focus special-status species analysis of the site prior to the reconnaissance surveys.
Olberding Environmental biologists conducted a reconnaissance-level survey of the Property on November 11, 2020. The survey consisted of walking throughout the Property and evaluating the site and adjacent lands for potential biological resources. Existing conditions observed plants and wildlife, adjacent land use, soils and potential biological resource constraints were recorded during the visit. Plant and wildlife species observed within and adjacent to the Property during the reconnaissance survey are listed in Attachment 2, Table 1. Site photographs are provided in Attachment 3 of this document. Attachment 1, Figure 9 shows where each site photo was taken.
The objectives of the field survey were to determine the potential presence or absence of specialstatus species habitat listed in the CNDDB database report and to identify any wetland areas that could be potentially regulated by the Corps, RWQCB, and/or CDFW (CNDDB 2020). In addition, the Olberding Environmental biologists looked for other potential sensitive species or habitats that may not have been obvious from background database reports or research. Surveys conducted after the growing season or conducted outside of the specific flowering period for a special-status plant cannot conclusively determine the presence or absence of such plant species; therefore, site conditions and habitat type were used to determine potential for occurrence. When suitable habitat was observed to support a special-status plant or animal species, it was noted in the discussion for that particular species. Regulatory agencies evaluate the possibility of occurrence based on habitats observed on-site and the degree of connectivity with other specialstatus animal habitats in the vicinity of the Property. These factors are discussed in each specialstatus plant or animal section. Potential for occurrence of each special-status or protected plant and animal species was evaluated using the following criteria. • Present: The species has been recorded by CNDDB or other literature as occurring on the Property and/or was observed on the Property during the reconnaissance survey or protocol surveys.
• May Occur: The species has been recorded by CNDDB or other literature as occurring within five miles of the Property, and/or was observed within five miles of the Property, and/or suitable habitat for the species is present on the Property or its immediate vicinity. • Not Likely to Occur: The species has historically occurred on or within five miles of the Property, but has no current records. The species occurs within five miles of the Property but only marginally suitable habitat conditions are present. The Property is likely to be used only as incidental foraging habitat or as an occasional migratory corridor. • Presumed Absent: The species will not occur on the Property due to the absence of suitable habitat conditions, and/or the lack of current occurrences. Alternatively, if 14 directed or protocol-level surveys were done during the proper occurrence period and the species was not found, it is presumed absent.
Sources consulted for agency status information include USFWS (2020) for federally listed species and CDFW (2019) for State of California listed species. Based on information from the above sources, Olberding Environmental developed a target list of special-status plants and animals with the potential to occur within or in the vicinity of the Property (Attachment 2, Table 2).
5.1 Soils Evaluation
The soils present on a property may determine if habitat on the site is suitable for certain specialstatus plants and animals. The host plants of some special-status invertebrates may also require specific soil conditions. In the absence of suitable soil conditions, special-status plants or animals requiring those conditions would be presumed absent. Information regarding soil characteristics for the Property was obtained by viewing the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey report for the Property (NRCS 2020).
5.2 Plant Survey Methods
The purposes of the botanical surveys were (1) to characterize the habitat types (plant communities) of the study area; (2) to determine whether any suitable habitat for any specialstatus plant species occurs within the study area; and (3) to determine whether any sensitive habitat types (wetlands) occur within the study area. Site conditions and plant habitat surveys are important tools in determining the potential occurrence of plants not recorded during surveys (e.g., special-status plants) because presence cannot conclusively be determined if field surveys are conducted after the growing season or conducted outside a specific flowering period.
5.2.1 Review of Literature and Data Sources
The biologists conducted focused surveys of literature and special-status species databases in order to identify special-status plant species and sensitive habitat types with potential to occur in the study area. Sources reviewed included the CNDDB occurrence records (CNDDB 2020) and CNPS Inventory (Skinner and Pavlik 1994) for the surrounding quads; and standard flora (The Jepson Manual 2012). From the above sources, a list of special-status plant species with potential to occur in the Property vicinity was developed (Attachment 2, Table 2).
5.2.2 Field Surveys
Biologists from Olberding Environmental conducted a reconnaissance-level survey to determine habitat types and the potential for special-status plants based on the observed habitat types. All 15 vascular plant species that were identifiable at the time of the survey were recorded and identified using keys and descriptions in The Jepson Manual (2012).
The habitat types occurring on the Property were characterized according to pre-established categories. In classifying the habitat types on the site, the generalized plant community classification schemes of A Manual of California Vegetation (Sawyer, Keeler-Wolf, and Evens 2009) were consulted. The final classification and characterization of the habitat types of the study area were based on field observations.
5.3 Wildlife Survey Methods
The purposes of the wildlife survey were to identify special-status wildlife species and/or potential special-status wildlife habitats within the study area.
5.3.1 Review of Literature and Data Sources
A focused review of literature and data sources was conducted in order to determine which special-status wildlife species had potential to occur in the vicinity of the Property. Current agency status information was obtained from USFWS (2020) for species listed as Threatened or Endangered, as well as Proposed and Candidate species for listing, under the federal ESA; and from CDFW (2020b, 2019) for species listed as Threatened or Endangered by the state of California under the CESA or listed as “species of special concern” by CDFW. From the above sources, a list of special-status wildlife species with potential to occur in the Property vicinity was developed (Attachment 2, Table 2).
5.3.2 Field Surveys
General Wildlife Survey – Olberding Environmental biologists conducted a survey of species habitat within the entire study area, including visible portions of the adjacent properties. The purpose of the habitat survey was to evaluate wildlife habitats and the potential for any protected species to occur on or adjacent to the Property.
Reconnaissance-Level Raptor Survey – A reconnaissance-level raptor survey was conducted on the Property. Observation points were established on the periphery of the site to view raptor activity over a fifteen- to thirty-minute time period. This survey was conducted with the use of binoculars and notes were taken for each species occurrence. Additionally, utility poles and perch sites in the vicinity of the Property were observed. All raptor activity within and adjacent to the Property was recorded during the reconnaissance-level observation period.
Reconnaissance-Level Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) Survey – A reconnaissance-level burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) survey was also conducted on the Property to identify 16 potential burrow sites or burrowing owl use of on-site habitat. The general presence and density of suitable burrow sites (e.g., rodent burrows) was evaluated for the Property.
6.0 RESULTS FOR GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The search and review of the CNDDB database reports revealed the occurrence of special-status plant and wildlife species that occur in the habitats found within the Property boundaries (CNDDB 2020). The CNDDB database and background data were reviewed for the surrounding quads. Animal occurrences shown on Attachment 1, Figure 5 and plant occurrences shown on Attachment 1, Figure 6 are located within 5 miles of the Property and were reviewed for their potential to occur on the Property based on general habitat types. Results of the species review are tabulated on Attachment 2, Table 2. Critical habitat within the surrounding quads is shown on Attachment 1, Figure 7.
6.1 Soil Evaluation Results
The NRCS (2020) reports three soil types within the Property. A map of the soil types can be found in Attachment 1, Figure 8. The soil type mapped included the following:
• Cc: Clear Lake Clay, 0 to 15 percent slopes – Clear Lake clay soils can be found at elevations between 25 and 2,000 feet with 0 to 2 percent slopes. The composition of this soil type within the Property consists of 85 percent Clear Lake and similar soils, and 15 percent of minor components including Pescadero (4%), Cropley (4%), Conejo (4%), and Unnamed (3%).
The Clear Lake series consists of very deep, poorly drained soils that formed in fine textured alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. Clear Lake soils are in basins and in swales of drainageways. Clear Lake soils exhibit slow to very slow permeability and negligible to high runoff (if assumed concave runoff is always negligible). These soils are used for growing many row crops such as tomatoes, beans and sugar beets, dry farmed to grain, or irrigated and dry farmed pasture, and for rangeland. Native vegetation consists of grasses and forbs. This series shows no frequency of ponding or flooding and is nonsaline. A water table is at depths of 4 to 10 feet in the late summer and in some areas is very near the surface during the wet months of winter. Some areas are artificially drained. Its stratified layers consist of the following (colors are for dry soil unless otherwise stated):
Ag--0 to 13 inches; dark gray clay, very dark gray moist; very hard, firm; neutral (pH
7.0).
Bssg1--13 to 19 inches; dark gray clay, very dark gray moist; extremely hard, very firm; moderately alkaline (pH 8.0).
17 Bssg2--19 to 45 inches; dark gray clay, very dark gray moist; extremely hard, very firm; moderately alkaline (pH 8.0).
Bssk--45 to 60 inches; grayish brown clay, light olive brown moist; very hard, very firm; moderately alkaline (pH 8.0).
• LcE: Lodo Clay Loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes– The Lodo Clay Loam series consists of somewhat excessively drained soils with a parent material of residuum weathered from sandstone and shale. These soils are found on steep hills at elevations of 300 to 3,000 feet. This soil type has no frequency of flooding or ponding. The composition of this soil type within the Property consists of 85 percent Lodo and similar soils and 15 percent of minor components including Millsholm (5%), Los Osos (5%), Tiera (3%), and Rock Outcrop (2%).
A--0 to 7 inches; grayish brown shaly clay loam, very dark grayish brown moist; weak fine subangular blocky structure; slightly acid.
R--7 inches; shattered warped and folded dark grayish brown hard shale. • CoE: Cut and Fill Land – Millsholm Complex, 9-30 percent slopes – The composition of this soil type within the Property consists of 75 percent cut and fill land (fill part, which is composed of 0-60 inches of silty clay loam), 15 percent Millsholm and similar soils, and 10 percent of minor components including Lodo (5%), Gilroy (3%), and Los Gatos (2%). This soils type has a parent material of residuum weathered from sandstone and shale. This soil type never experiences flooding or ponding and has a very low water capacity.
6.2 Plant Survey Results
6.2.1 Floristic Inventory and Habitat Characterization
The Property supports six habitat types consisting of developed habitat, potential seasonal wetlands, a perennial drainage, riparian woodland, eucalyptus woodland, and ruderal grassland.
In classifying the habitat types on the Property, generalized plant community classification schemes were used (Sawyer, Keeler-Wolf, and Evens 2009). The final classification and characterization of the habitat type of the Property was based on field observations. Plant species that occurred within 5 miles of the Property are shown in Attachment 1, Figure 6.
The habitat type and a description of the plant species present within the habitat type are provided below. The habitats found on the Property are mapped on Attachment 1, Figure 10. 18 Dominant plant species are also noted. A complete list of plant species observed on the Property can be found within Attachment 2, Table 1.
Developed
The existing residence, outbuildings, water storage tank, cell tower, and driveway comprise 1.94 acres of developed habitat. The residence and outbuildings are surrounded by fallow grass lawns and cultivated ornamental trees and shrubs such as date palm, giant yucca (Yucca gigantea), English ivy, weeping willow (Salix babylonica), olive, Peruvian peppertree, blue gum eucalyptus, English walnut, pampas grass, and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). The large water storage tank and cell tower are surrounded by ruderal grassland habitat.
Perennial Drainage
The perennial drainage feature is located along the southern boundary of the Property and contained water throughout the majority of its length. Dominant species observed include Himalayan blackberry, and English ivy. The westernmost stretch of this feature did not contain surface water; however, this section was dominated by hydrophytic species such as narrowleaved cattail (Typha angustifolia), and umbrella sedge (Cyperus eragrostis). This feature was surrounded by riparian woodland habitat. Figure 10 indicates Perennial Drainage (0.10 AC, 454 LNFT).
Potential Seasonal Wetland
Two seasonal wetlands comprising approximately 0.034 acres, were located along the northern boundary of the Property. Dominant vegetation observed within this section includes but is not limited to bristly ox-tongue, annual beard grass, salt grass (Distichlis spicata), and common plantain (Plantago major).
Riparian Woodland
The riparian woodland habitat is approximately 0.17 acres and is located along the southern boundary of the site and surrounds the perennial drainage feature on the Property. This habitat is dominated by a mix of both native and non-native trees such as blue gum eucalyptus, coast redwood, California buckeye, English walnut, northern California black walnut, Lombardy poplar, arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis), and red willow (Salix laevigata).
Eucalyptus Woodland
The eucalyptus woodland habitat within the Property is comprised of approximately 0.83 acres of large blue gum eucalyptus trees. Numerous eucalyptus trees line the driveway to the Property and are also found surrounding the developed and riparian woodland habitat near the southern boundary of the site.
19 Ruderal Grassland
A majority of the Property (4.40 acres) is characterized by ruderal grassland habitat that has been disturbed by past grazing and livestock activities, and recent land management practices such as disking for weed abatement. In the areas where disking has occurred, little to no living vegetation was observed. The remaining ruderal grasslands occurred in areas that were previously used as paddocks or grazing land for horses and other livestock. Dominant vegetation includes non-native annual grasses such as wild oat, Johnsongrass, soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus) and other bromes (Bromus spp.). Additional species observed include alkali mallow (Malvella leprosa), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), and clover (Trifolium hybridum). Several large trees are present along the western boundary of the Property within the ruderal grassland habitat and consist of species such as English walnut and California buckeye.
Special-Status Plant Species
Special-status plant species include species listed as Rare, Threatened, or Endangered by the USFWS (2020) or by the State of California (CDFW 2020b). Federal Proposed and Candidate species (USFWS, 2019) are also special-status species. Special-status species also include species listed on List 1A, List 1B, or List 2 of the CNPS Inventory (Skinner and Pavlik, 1994; CNPS 2020). All species in the above categories fall under state regulatory authority under the provisions of CEQA and may also fall under federal regulatory authority. Considered special-status species are species included on List 3 (Plants About Which We Need More Information—A Review List) or List 4 (Plants of Limited Distribution—A Watch List) of the CNPS Inventory.
These species are considered to be of lower sensitivity and generally do not fall under specific state or federal regulatory authority. Specific mitigation considerations are not generally required for List 3 and List 4 species.
Attachment 2, Table 2 includes a list of special-status plants with the potential to occur within or in the immediate vicinity of the Property based on a review of the surrounding quads. The special-status plant species identified by the CNDDB as potentially occurring on the Property are known to grow only from specific habitat types. The specific habitats or “micro-climate” necessary for many of the plant species to occur are not found within the boundaries of the Property. The habitats necessary for the CNDDB reported plant species consist of valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodlands, closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, playas, chenopod scrub, alkaline soils, serpentine soils, alkali flats, flooded lands, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, coastal salt marsh, vernal pools, seeps, meadows and sinks, swamps, freshwater or brackish marsh, cismontane woodlands, freshwater wetlands, oak woodlands, and broad-leafed upland forest. Occurrence distance from the Property is estimated from this center point (Attachment 1, Figure 6).
A query of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) showed that thirteen specialstatus plant species occur in a 5-mile radius of the Property. The majority of these species were 20 identified as having no potential to occur on the Property based on the absence of suitable habitat, soil composition, and the development and disturbance of the Property. Suitable habitats for these species include vernal pool, serpentine environments, chaparral, broad-leafed upland forest, cismontane woodlands, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, freshwater wetland, brackish or freshwater marsh, none of which are found on the Property. The Property contains ruderal grassland, developed, riparian woodland, seasonal wetland, perennial drainage, and eucalyptus woodland habitats that are frequently disturbed by human activity and livestock grazing.
Additionally, the frequent tilling throughout the Property for weed abatement and property maintenance makes it highly unlikely for these species to occur, particularly those relying on vernal pools or grassland habitat. For these reasons, it is unlikely that these special status plant species would occur.
Two species that had one or more occurrences within the immediate vicinity of the Property are discussed in detail below.
Diablo Helianthella (Helianthella castanea). CNPS List 1B.
Diablo helianthella is a perennial that exhibits yellow sunflowers that bloom between April and June. The plant has simple broad leaves that are attached at the base of the stem and grows up to two feet in height. The Diablo helianthella is known to grow on open grassy sites in cismontane woodland and closed-cone coniferous forests.
CNDDB listed eight occurrences within five miles of the Property. The closest occurrence (Occurrence # 106) was observed approximately 3.0 miles south of the Property in 2007. The exact location was unknown; therefore, the occurrence was broadly documented as occurring within Pinole Valley Park, with an unspecified number of plants collected from the hillside and canyon above Wright Road. The most recent occurrence (Occurrence # 87) was documented approximately 5.0 miles southeast of the Property, near Pinole Peak, north of Pinole Creek in 2014. In this occurrence, numerous plants were observed in the region dating back to 1993, with three plants observed in a very small portion of the range in 2014. No plants were observed at the time of the November survey. The Property contains ruderal grassland habitat, as well as a perennial drainage which is surrounded by riparian woodland habitat consisting of a mixture of native and non-native trees. Diablo helianthella prefers rocky axonal soil; however, the soils present on the Property contain high clay content with areas of sandstone and shale alluvium, making the soils within the Property less suitable habitat. Additionally, the Property was historically used for housing livestock such as horses, and many areas of the Property were either developed or utilized as grazing pastures for these livestock leading to a high level of disturbance to the site. For these reasons, Diablo helianthella is not likely to occur on the Property. 21 Santa Cruz Tarplant (Holocarpha macradenia). Federally Threatened, State Endangered, CNPS List 1B.
Santa Cruz tarplant is an annual herb of the Asteraceae family. It is found along coastal terraces in Alameda, Contra Costa, Monterey, Marin and Santa Cruz Counties. It is found in coastal prairie and valley and foothill grassland habitats in sandy clay soils, often amongst non-native plants. Yellow flowers bloom between June and October.
CNDDB listed nine occurrences (Occurrence # 16, 27, 28, 29, 35, 36, 38, 39, and 44) within five miles of the Property. Occurrences 16, 27, 36, and 39 are all extirpated, and 35 and 42 are likely extirpated as well. The only extant populations (#28, 29) are on located approximately 4.0 to 4.5 miles from the Property on protected lands. Occurrence #28 was recorded in Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, 1.0 mile east of Hillview School, approximately 4.0 miles south of the Property.
In this occurrence, 203 plants were observed on a west-facing slope in association with nonnative avena and bromus grass species in 2009. Occurrence #29 was recorded on the Mezue Trail, 1.5 miles east of Hillview School, in Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, approximately 4.5 miles south of the Property. In this occurrence, 401 plants were observed in 2009. No plants were observed at the time of the November survey. Santa Cruz tarplant prefers coastal prairie, coastal scrub, and valley grassland habitat; however, the Property contains ruderal grassland habitat that has been historically disturbed by human disturbance such as disking for weed management, as well as livestock activity such as grazing. The Property does contain marginally suitable soil for this species with its high clay and sand content, however due to the extensive disturbance and development to the Property, along with the lack of nearby extant populations, it is not likely that Santa Cruz tarplant would occur on the Property.
6.3 Wildlife Survey Results
6.3.1 General Wildlife Species and Habitats
A complete list of wildlife species observed within the Property can be found in Attachment 2, Table 1. Wildlife species commonly occurring within habitat types present on the Property are discussed below:
Developed
The Property contains a vacant residence along with numerous out buildings and barns, many of which contained openings that could provide opportunities for numerous species of wildlife to utilize these structures for shelter or nesting purposes. Several horse stalls on the Property appeared to have evidence of old nests along the walls, potentially made by species such as black phoebes (Sayornis nigricans). Additionally, the large open barns on the Property contained evidence of white wash from birds perching along the rafters, and this structure could also 22 provide nesting opportunities for owl species such as the barn owl (Tyto alba). In addition to avian species, these vacant structures could provide roosting opportunities for numerous structure-roosting bat species such as the Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis), pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), and Towsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii). Other species observed within the developed habitat include several domestic cats (Felis catus).
The Property also contained a gravel and asphalt driveway surrounded by ornamental plants, and a fallow lawn associated with the residence. The large ornamental trees surrounding the structures could provide nesting opportunities for numerous avian species, as well as roosting opportunities for foliage roosting bat species such as the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus). Avian species observed foraging in the developed habitat include bushtits (Psaltriparus minimus) and dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis).
Ruderal Grassland
The majority of the Property consists of ruderal grassland habitat, much of which appears to have been that has been recently disked leading to reduced vegetation throughout this habitat.
Passerine species observed during the survey include lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria), goldencrowned sparrow (Zonotrichia atricapilla), white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), and western bluebird (Sialia mexicana). Other avian species observed include American crow (Corvus bracyrynchos), and turkey vulture (Cathartes aura). The red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) was the only raptor species observed during the survey.
Small mammal burrows were observed throughout the Property, belonging to small rodent species such as the California vole (Microtus californicus) and mice (Peromyscus spp.).
The ruderal grassland habitat, along with the cover from old farm equipment and debris could offer suitable habitat for various reptile species such as western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), and pacific gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer catenifer).
Drainage
The perennial drainage along the southern boundary of the Property contained water throughout much of its length, which could provide numerous foraging opportunities to a number of species.
The wetted sections of the drainage could provide potential habitat for amphibian species such as Sierran treefrogs (Pseudacris sierra). Additionally, the drainage may support an array of insects, allowing for abundant foraging opportunities for various bat and passerine species. Species observed in this habitat include black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), ruby-crowned kinglet (Regulus calendula), and spotted towhee (Pipilo maculatus). 23 Potential Seasonal Wetland
Two seasonal wetlands occur along the northern boundary of the Property and did not contain surface water during the time of the survey. These features could provide an abundance of insects and additional vegetative cover that could provide foraging opportunities for a variety of passerines and during the wet season. Species observed utilizing the potential seasonal wetland habitat include the lesser goldfinch.
Riparian Woodland
The riparian woodland habitat along the southern boundary of the Property provides numerous foraging and nesting opportunities for many avian and foliage roosting bat species. The mature trees, and dense, shrubby understory provide an abundance of nesting opportunities for a variety of avian species. Species observed utilizing this habitat include yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronata), chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufescens), hairy woodpecker (Leuconotopicus villosus), Nuttall’s woodpecker (Picoides nuttallii), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), and cedar waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum). Eastern fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) were also observed nesting and foraging in this habitat.
Eucalyptus Woodland
The large eucalyptus trees within this habitat provides suitable nesting habitat for a variety of raptor species. In addition to avian species, this habitat could also provide suitable overwintering habitat for monarch butterflies.
BIRDS
Red-Tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). State Protected.
The red-tailed hawk is a large Buteo that is distinct due to the red color of its tail feathers in contrast to the brown color of its body. Not all red-tailed hawks exhibit the distinct coloration on their tail and gradations may occur especially in young birds. Red-tailed hawks hunt rodents by soaring over grassland habitat. Nest trees for red-tailed hawks are usually tall trees with a welldeveloped canopy that includes a strong branching structure on which to build a nest.
The CNDDB does not track occurrences of red-tailed hawk; however, several red-tailed hawks were observed foraging in the area during the November survey. No large stick nests were observed on the Property; however, the Property contains numerous large trees such as the blue gum eucalyptus, that would make for suitable nesting habitat within the Property. In addition, foraging opportunities occur along the ruderal grassland habitat due to the abundance of small mammals. Given the information above the red-tailed hawk has high potential to occur on the Property in a nesting capacity and is present in a foraging capacity. 24 Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus). State Protected.
The red-shouldered hawk is a medium-sized, slender Buteo with long legs and a long tail and is smaller than the red-tailed hawk. Upperparts are dark with pale spotting, and rusty-reddish feathers on the wing create the distinctive shoulder patch. The tail has several wide, dark bars; the intervening narrow stripes and the tip of the tail are white, and there is variation in the number of tail bars among adults and juveniles. The habitat that the red-shouldered hawk prefers varies from bottomland hardwoods and riparian areas to upland deciduous or mixed deciduousconifer forest, and almost always includes some form of water, such as a swamp, marsh, river, or pond. In the west, the red-shouldered hawk sometimes occurs in coniferous forests, and has been expanding its range of occupied habitats to include various woodlands, including stands of eucalyptus trees amid urban sprawl. They typically place their nests in a broad-leaved tree (occasionally in a conifer), below the forest canopy but toward the tree top, usually in the crotch of the main trunk. Nest trees are often near a pond, stream, or swamp, and can be in suburban neighborhoods or parks. These hawks eat mostly small mammals, lizards, snakes, and amphibians. They also eat toads, snakes, and crayfish. They occasionally eat birds, sometimes from bird feeders; recorded prey includes sparrows, starlings, and doves.
The CNDDB does not track occurrences of red-shouldered hawk. The large trees present within the riparian and eucalyptus woodland offer suitable nesting habitat. Additionally, the abundance of small mammals within the ruderal grassland habitat on the Property provides numerous foraging opportunities. Given the information above the red-shouldered hawk has high potential to occur on the Property in a nesting and foraging capacity.
Cooper’s Hawk (Accipiter cooperii). State Protected.
Coppers’ hawk is a medium to large-size raptor, reaching an average of 28-34 in wingspan. They are distinctive for the black and white horizontal banding on the elongated tail, blue gray head, back and upperwings. Rusty red horizontal barring on a white breast. Large square head. Long yellow legs and feet. Cooper’s hawk hunt in woodlands, riparian areas, and can even be observed hunting in densely vegetated urban areas for small birds, rodents and reptiles. Specialists at hunting avian prey, Copper’s hawk often hunt along the edges of woodlands, shorelines, and riparian habitats where migrating passerines typically occur. Cooper’s hawk typically nests within the vegetation of tall trees near riparian habitat and nesting habitat for these raptors consists of woodlands, coniferous forest, and dense oak woodland.
CNDDB listed one occurrence (Occurrence #70) of Cooper’s hawk within the vicinity of the Property. In this occurrence, numerous adults along with a nest and one fledgling were observed in 1999, south of Franklin Canyon Road, east of Hercules, approximately 3.5 miles east of the Property. No Cooper’s hawks were observed during the November survey; however, the Property contains suitable nesting habitat due to the abundance of large trees within the site, and numerous foraging opportunities exist throughout the Property due to the abundance of small 25 birds present throughout the site. Given the information above the Cooper’s hawk may occur in both a nesting and foraging capacity.
White-tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus). Federal Species of Concern, CDFW: Fully Protected.
The white-tailed kite is falcon-shaped with a long white tail. This raptor has black patches on the shoulders that are highly visible while the bird is flying or perching, long, pointed gray wings, and deep red eyes with black eye ring. This species forages in annual grasslands, farmlands, orchards, chaparral, and at the edges of marshes and meadows. They are found nesting in trees and shrubs such as willows (Salix sp.), California sycamore (Platanus racemosa), and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) often near marshes, lakes, rivers, or ponds. This raptor often hovers while inspecting the ground below for prey. The white-tailed kite eats mainly small mammals, as well as some birds, lizards, and insects. Annual grasslands are considered good foraging habitat for white-tailed kites, which will forage in human-impacted areas.
CNDDB did not list any nearby occurrences of white-tailed kite within the vicinity of the Property; however, the Property contains suitable foraging habitat throughout the ruderal grassland due to the abundance of small mammals, and the riparian and eucalyptus woodland habitat onsite provide suitable nesting habitat. Given the information above the white-tailed kite may occur in both a nesting and foraging capacity.
San Pablo Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia samuelis). California Species of Special Concern.
The San Pablo song sparrow is a song sparrow subspecies that is endemic to the tidal saltmarshes surrounding North San Francisco Bay and San Pablo Bay. These birds utilize habitat with California cord grass, pickleweed, and gumplant. They require sites with dense vegetation for nesting, for song perches, and for cover from predators.
CNDDB listed six occurrences (Occurrence #9, 26, 29, 30, 37, and 42) of San Pablo song sparrow within five miles of the Property. The majority of these occurrences are historical (occurring 20 or more years ago). Occurrence #30 is the closest record to the Property, and the Property lies within the boundary of this occurrence. This record is a historical occurrence from specimens collected in 1947. The exact location of the specimen collection is unknown, and was mapped roughly to a salt marsh 4.0 miles north of Richmond. The most recent occurrence (Occurrence # 9) is documented approximately 4.5 miles northeast of the Property, at the southwestern tip of Mare Island, southwest of Vallejo. In this occurrence, 130 adults were detected in April and May in 2004. No San Pablo song sparrows were observed during the November survey. The San Pablo song sparrow’s range is restricted mainly to the fringes of the San Pablo Bay portion of the San Francisco Bay estuary (Shuford and Gardali, 2008). The Property did not contain California chordgrass, pickleweed, or gumplant vegetation which this species prefers, and it lacked the tidal saltmarsh habitat necessary for foraging and nesting. 26 Although Occurrence #30 overlaps with the Property boundary, this historical record was an approximation, with a maximum error distance of up to 1.0 mile. Additionally, since the collection of this specimen in 1947, the surrounding area has been developed extensively by both residential and commercial development which could create potential barriers to the dispersal of this species onto the Property from the more suitable tidal marsh habitat north of the site. For these reasons, the San Pablo song sparrow is presumed absent from the Property.
Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni). State Threatened.
The Swainson’s hawk is a raptor that is slightly smaller than the red-tailed hawk with long wings that taper slightly toward the outer wing tip. This hawk has a brown bib that covers its head and extends down the chest. The leading portion of the wing is light in color. In flight, this bird has an inverse color pattern in comparison to a red-tailed hawk. This hawk has three potential color morphs---light, intermediate and dark. Swainson’s hawks are summer migrants to the Central Valley and Delta region where they nest within larger-sized trees.
CNDDB did not list any occurrences of Swainson’s hawks within a five-mile radius of the Property, however there were eight occurrences of this species documented in the surrounding quadrants. This species was not observed during the November survey. The Property contained suitable nesting trees for Swainson’s hawk with the numerous large eucalyptus trees; however, the site is less suitable for nesting due to the high level of urbanization and disturbance within and surrounding the Property. Swainson’s hawks prefer to forage in open fields, agricultural areas, and sites with an abundance of small mammals. The surrounding areas are largely developed, with residential and commercial buildings, and the ruderal grassland habitat within the Property provides only marginally suitable foraging habitat. For these reasons and due to the lack of nearby nesting occurrences, the Swainson’s hawk is not likely to occur on the Property.
MAMMALS
Special-status Bats
Bats (Order - Chiroptera) are the only mammals capable of “true” flight. They are nocturnal feeders and locate their prey, which consists of small to medium sized insects by echolocation.
Bats consume vast amounts of insects making them very effective pest control agents. They may eat as much as their weight in insects per day. Maternity roosts comprised of only females, may be found in buildings or mine shafts with temperatures up to 40 degrees Celsius and a high percentage of humidity to ensure rapid growth in the young. Female bats give birth to only one or two young annually and roost in small or large numbers. Males may live singly or in small groups, but scientists are still unsure of the whereabouts of most males in summer. 27 Special-status bats with the potential to occur on the Property are listed below:
• Hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus)
• Silver-haired bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans)
• Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)
• Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis)
• Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii)
CNDDB listed one occurrence (Occurrence #139) of pallid bat within 5-miles of the Property. In this historical occurrence, recorded in 1937, several specimens were collected from an unknown location mapped approximately to an area west of Pinole at sea level, approximately 4.0 miles east of the Property. In addition to this occurrence, CNDDB listed several occurrences of Townsend’s big-eared bat, hoary bat, pallid bat, and silver-haired bat in the surrounding 9 quadrants. No bats, or sign of bat occupation was observed during the November survey; however, the site contains an abundance of suitable roosting habitat throughout the Property. The large trees present throughout the site contain dense foliage, peeling bark, and tree cavities, all of which provide roosting opportunities for foliage and cavity roosting species such as the hoary bat, Yuma myotis, and silver-haired bat. The Property also contains numerous vacant structures which could provide roosting habitat for structure roosting species such as Townsend’s big-eared bat, pallid bat, and Yuma Myotis. Additionally, the grassland, perennial drainage, and riparian habitats provide an array of insects, allowing for abundant foraging opportunities throughout the site. Given the above information, Yuma myotis, hoary bat, pallid bat, and Townsend’s big-eared bat have a high potential to occur on the Property in both a roosting and foraging capacity, while the silver-haired bat has a moderate potential to occur in both a roosting and foraging capacity.
AMPHIBIANS
California Red-Legged Frog (Rana draytonii). Federally Threatened, California Species of Special Concern.
California red-legged frog (CRLF) was listed as a Federal threatened species on May 31, 1996 (61 FR 25813) and is considered threatened throughout its range. If a proposed Property may jeopardize listed species, Section 7 of the ESA requires consideration of those species through formal consultations with the USFWS. Federal Proposed species (USFWS 2006c) are species for which a proposed listing as Threatened or Endangered under the ESA has been published in the Federal Register. If a proposed Property may jeopardize proposed species, Section 7 of the ESA affords consideration of those species through informal conferences with USFWS. On April 13, 2006, USFWS designated critical habitat for the CRLF under the ESA. In total, approximately 450,288 acres fell within the boundaries of critical habitat designation. A new ruling by the USFWS on March 17, 2010, revised the designation of critical habitat for CRLF (75 FR 12815 12959). In total, approximately 1,636,609 acres of critical habitat in 27 California 28 counties fall within the boundaries of the final revised critical habitat designation. This rule became effective on April 16, 2010.
The CRLF is a rather large frog, measuring one and a half to five inches in length. They are reddish-brown to gray in color, with many poorly defined dark specks and blotches. Dorsolateral folds are present. The underside of the CRLF is washed with red on the lower abdomen and hind legs. The CRLF has a dark mask bordered by a light stripe on the jaw, smooth eardrums, and not fully webbed toes. The male has enlarged forearms and swollen thumbs. Its vocals consist of a series of weak throaty notes, rather harsh, and lasting two to three seconds. Breeding occurs from December to March with egg masses laid in permanent bodies of water.
The CRLF is found in lowlands, foothill woodland and grasslands, near marshes, lakes, ponds or other water sources. These amphibians require dense shrubby or emergent vegetation closely associated with deep still or slow-moving water. Generally, these frogs favor intermittent streams with water at least two and a half feet deep and where the shoreline has relatively intact emergent or shoreline vegetation. CRLF is known from streams with relatively low gradients and those waters where introduced fish and bullfrogs are absent. CRLF are known to take refuge upland in small mammal burrows during periods of high-water flow. CRLF occurs west of the Sierra Nevada-Cascade and in the Coast Ranges along the entire length of the state. Historically, they occurred throughout the Central Valley and Sierra Nevada foothills south to northern Baja California. Now they are found from Sonoma and Butte Counties south to Riverside, but mainly in Monterey, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara Counties.
CNDDB listed 8 occurrences of the CRLF occurring within five miles of the Property, with the majority of these occurrences recorded southeast of Interstate 80 within the USFWS designated critical habitat for CRLF (Unit D02D) (Attachment 1, Figure 7). The closest occurrence (Occurrence #407) is approximately 1.5 miles east of the Property. In this occurrence, two adults and nine juveniles were observed in a tributary to Refugio Creek, southeast of the intersection of Interstate 80 and Highway 4, in 2000. The most recent occurrence (Occurrence #1113) was documented in 2008 approximately 4.5 miles southeast of the Property. The perennial drainage and potential seasonal wetland features on the Property, do not offer suitable habitat to support breeding for this species due to the lack of deep ponding water onsite. Additionally, the closest occurrence of CRLF is approximately 1.5 miles from the Property, which is outside of the onemile dispersal range known for this species. The site contains wetted riparian habitat which could provide adequate shelter, foraging opportunities, and predator avoidance for this species; however, the closest occurrence is located outside the known dispersal distance for this species, and is separated from the Property by extensive residential development, roads, and Interstate 80, all of which could be potential barriers to the dispersal of CRLF onto the Property from more suitable breeding habitat elsewhere. For these reasons, CRLF is not likely to occur on the Property.
29 INVERTEBRATES
Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus). Winter Roost Sites State Protected.
The monarch butterfly is identified by its bright orange color. The wings have a wide black border and black veins. The apex and borders of the wings contain white spots and the wingspan is approximately three to four inches. This species of butterfly ranges from southern Canada throughout the United States, Central and South America. Each autumn (August through October) monarch butterflies migrate south to overwinter in massive aggregations in coastal California and in central Mexico. Monarchs typically reach their overwintering grounds by September or October. Monarchs select overwintering sites based on protection from high wind and storms, absence of freezing temperatures, presence of spatially variable light such as full sun, shade, and dappled sunlight, the presence of high humidity, and availability of water. These aggregations of sometimes millions of individuals can be found in sheltered groves of trees such as eucalyptus, Monterey Pine and cypress. The host plant of the monarch butterfly is the milkweed (Ascelepius sp.). Eggs are laid on the underside of the leaves. Upon hatching, the larvae feed on the poisonous host plant, storing these toxins as protection from predators.
Monarch butterfly overwintering sites are protected in California.
CNDDB listed one occurrence (Occurrence #24) of a monarch butterfly overwintering site within five miles of the Property. In this occurrence, a population of overwintering monarchs was observed within blue gum eucalyptus trees at Point Pinole Regional Shoreline from 1980 to 2011, approximately 3.5 miles west of the Property. The Property contains plenty of blue gum eucalyptus trees that would provide suitable habitat for overwintering monarchs. For these reasons, the monarch butterfly has a moderate potential to occur on the Property.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
7.1 Wetlands
Results of the biological resource analysis survey conducted by Olberding Environmental indicate that the Property contains wetlands/waters considered jurisdictional by the Corps, RWQCB or CDFW. The Property has a perennial drainage feature, and two isolated seasonal wetlands. The Corp has determined that they would only have jurisdiction over the perennial drainage feature. Similarly, the CDFW would only have jurisdiction over the drainage and associated riparian habitat. However, the RWQCB would regulate both the perennial drainage and isolated seasonal wetland features. a. Site development would avoid all three jurisdictional features and incorporate avoidance and project design features such as setback buffers and augmentation of hydrology, to protect and maintain the drainage and wetlands.. 30 7.2 Special-status Plants
No special-status plant species were determined to have a potential to occur on the Property.
This was based on the frequent disturbance by livestock activity and land management practices within the Property, as well as the absence of suitable habitats and soil types, and nearby or recent CNDDB occurrences.
7.3 Special-status Wildlife
Foraging or Nesting Raptor/Passerine Species – A total of four bird species were identified as having potential to occur on the Property. Red-tailed hawk, red-shouldered hawk, white-tailed kite, and Cooper’s hawk had a high potential to occur on the Property in both a nesting and foraging capacity. The red-tailed hawk was the only raptor species observed foraging on the Property during the time of the survey.
Special-Status Mammals – Given the presence of suitable onsite habitat; the pallid bat, hoary bat, Townsend’s big-eared bat, silver-haired, and Yuma myotis have a high to moderate potential to occur on the Property in a foraging and roosting capacity. No immediate signs of bats were present during the initial survey but the large redwood, eucalyptus, and palm trees, as well as the vacant residence, barns, and outbuildings within the Property could provide potential roosting habitat.
Special-Status Amphibians – CNDDB lists 8 occurrences of CRLF and USFWS designated critical habitat within the vicinity of the Property. The Property contains potential seasonal wetlands and a perennial drainage feature; however, they do not provide suitable breeding habitat for this species. The Property contains marginally suitable foraging and dispersal habitat for this species, although the closest occurrence is outside of the one-mile dispersal distance for CRLF.
For these reasons, CRLF is not likely to occur on the Property.
Special-Status Invertebrates– CNDDB lists one occurrence of a monarch butterfly overwintering site within the vicinity of the Property. The Property contains suitable overwintering habitat with the presence of eucalyptus woodland and the presence of water within the site. For these reasons, monarch butterfly has a moderate potential to overwinter on the Property.
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
• Pre-Construction Avian Survey – If project construction-related activities would take place during the nesting season (February through August), preconstruction surveys for nesting passerine birds and raptors (birds of prey) within the Property should be conducted by a competent biologist 14 days prior to the commencement of the tree removal or site grading activities. If any bird listed under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act 31 is found to be nesting within the project site or within the area of influence, an adequate protective buffer zone should be established by a qualified biologist to protect the nesting site. This buffer shall be a minimum of 75 feet from the project activities for passerine birds, and a minimum of 200 feet for raptors. The distance shall be determined by a competent biologist based on the site conditions (topography, if the nest is in a line of sight of the construction and the sensitivity of the birds nesting). The nest site(s) shall be monitored by a competent biologist periodically to see if the birds are stressed by the construction activities and if the protective buffer needs to be increased. Once the young have fledged and are flying well enough to avoid project construction zones (typically by August), the project can proceed without further regard to the nest site(s). • Pre-construction Bat Survey – To avoid “take” of special–status bats, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented prior to the removal of any existing trees or structures on the project site:
a) A bat habitat assessment shall be conducted by a qualified bat biologist during seasonal periods of bat activity (mid–February through mid–October – ca. Feb. 15 – Apr. 15, and Aug. 15 – October 30), to determine suitability of each existing structure as bat roost habitat.
b) Structures found to have no suitable openings can be considered clear for project activities as long as they are maintained so that new openings do not occur. c) Structures found to provide suitable roosting habitat, but without evidence of use by bats, may be sealed until project activities occur, as recommended by the bat biologist.
Structures with openings and exhibiting evidence of use by bats shall be scheduled for humane bat exclusion and eviction, conducted during appropriate seasons, and under supervision of a qualified bat biologist.
d) Bat exclusion and eviction shall only occur between February 15 and April 15, and from August 15 through October 30, in order to avoid take of non–volant (non–flying or inactive, either young, or seasonally torpid) individuals.
OR
A qualified wildlife biologist experienced in surveying for and identifying bat species should survey the portion of the Property with large trees and abandoned structures. If tree removal is proposed to determine if any special–status bats reside in the trees. Any special–status bats identified should be removed without harm. Bat houses sufficient to shelter the number of bats removed should be erected in open space areas that would not be disturbed by project development.
32 • Monarch Butterfly Survey – The monarch butterfly arrives at California overwintering sites in September and October. Due to the CNDDB occurrence of an overwintering site within a five-mile radius of the Property, an overwintering monarch survey is recommended in late September or the month of October to confirm the presence or absence of overwintering monarch butterflies on the Property. • Riparian Habitat Replacement - Riparian woodland habitat exists along a perennial drainage located along the southern boundary of the project site. Native tree species such as California buckeye, California black walnut, and willow species are present throughout this habitat. If removal of any trees deemed “protected” by the City of Hercules Municipal Code (Title 4, Chapter 15 – Removal of Mature Trees) from the riparian habitat during project activities were to occur, all ordinances and codes must be adhered to. An arborist report may be necessary to determine the identity of trees planned for removal or alteration, the impact of alteration, and measures that may be required to address tree removal if tree removal should occur. The City requires a tree replacement plan to be submitted and approved prior to any tree removal. Olberding Environmental recommends that all trees over 12 diameters at breast height (DBH) in size slated for removal shall be replaced at a 3:1 ratio of 15-gallon trees. 15-gallon containers have been in the pots/nursery for the least amount of time and have the greatest potential to have well formed, but not defective, root system. Adherence to Title 4, Chapter 15 - Removal of Mature Trees of the City of Hercules Municipal Code would result in a less than significant impact to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. • Biological Monitoring - Wildlife exclusion fencing shall be installed around the perimeter of the work area in order to prevent native and migratory wildlife species from entering the project site during construction activities. Daily biological monitoring during initial grubbing and weekly checks of wildlife exclusion fencing after initial grubbing has concluded. These monitoring activities will be conducted by a qualified biologist having local wildlife experience. Daily wildlife surveys would be included. All contractors and construction crews working onsite will receive environmental and biological sensitivity training in order to reduce or avoid effects on covered species during construction activities.
• Erosion Control – Grading and excavation activities could expose soil to increased rates of erosion during construction periods. During construction, runoff from the Property could adversely affect aquatic life within the adjacent water features. Surface water runoff could remove particles of fill or excavated soil from the site, or could erode soil down-gradient, if the flow were not controlled. Deposition of eroded material in adjacent water features could increase turbidity, thereby endangering aquatic life, and reducing wildlife habitat. Implementation of appropriate mitigation measures would ensure that impacts to aquatic organisms would be avoided or minimized. Mitigation measures may 33 include use of best management practices (BMP’s) such as hay bales, silt fencing, placement of straw mulch and hydro seeding of exposed soils after construction as identified in a project Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). 34 9.0 LITERATURE CITED
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Natural Diversity Data Base. 2020.
Computer listings and map locations of historic and current recorded occurrences of special-status species and natural communities of special concern for USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle map: Mare Island. Accessed on November 17, 2020. __________.2020a. California Wildlife Habitat Relationships. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR/Wildlife-Habitats __________.2020b. State and federally listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare plants of California. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109390&inline __________.2020. Special animals.
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109406&inline California Native Plant Society (CNPS), Rare Plant Program. 2020. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v8-03 0.39). Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org Accessed November 12, 2020.
CEQA. 2020. The California Environmental Quality Act. Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form. Accessed on November 12, 2020. Available online at https://www.califaep.org/docs/2020_ceqa_book.pdf
City of Hercules Municipal Code. 1996. Title 4. Public Welfare, Morals, and Conduct. Accessed on December 2, 2020. Available online at
:https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Hercules/#!/Hercules04/Hercules0415.html#4-15 Ehrlich, P.R., D.S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The Birder’s Handbook: a field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York. 785 pp.
The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition, Thoroughly Revised and Expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 2012. 1400 pp.
Holland (1986) Preliminary Description of the Natural Communities of California. CDFW.
Mayer, K. E. and Laudenslayer W.F. 1988. A Guide to Wildlife Habitats of California.
California.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2020. United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Accessed November 12, 2020. Available on-line at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
35 Pierce, Robert J. 1995. Wetland Delineation Lecture Notes. Wetland Training Institute, Inc., Poolesville, MD. WTI 95-2. 200pp.
Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation. 2nd Ed.
California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.
Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
Skinner, M. W. and B. M. Pavlik (eds.). 1994. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication No. 1 (5th edition).
California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. 338 pp.
Sibley, D.A. 2000. The Sibley Guide to Birds. Alfred Knopf, New York.
Sibley, C.G., and B.L. Munroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale University Press, New Haven and London. 1111 pp.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020. Endangered and threatened plant and animal species. Accessed on November 12, 2020.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/listedSpecies/speciesListingsByTaxGroupTotalsPage __________. 2019. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of plant and animal taxa that are Candidates or Proposed for listing as Endangered or Threatened; annual notice of findings on recycled petitions; annual description of progress on listing actions; proposed rule. Federal Register 68: 54732-54757.
__________. 2007. Bald Eagle Management Guidelines and Conservation Measures. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Accessed on November 2020. Available on-line at http://www.fws.gov/northeast/ecologicalservices/pdf/NationalBaldEagleManagementGui delines.pdf.
_________. 2006. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Designation of Critical Habitat for the California Red-Legged Frog, and Special Rule Exemption Assocaited with Final Listing for Existing Routine Ranching Activities; Final Rule. Federal Register 71: 19244-19346.
_________. 2004. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Determination of Threatened Status for the California Tiger Salamander; and Special Rule Exemption for Existing Routine Ranching Activities; Final Rule. Federal Register 69: 47212-47248.
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1
FIGURES
Figure 1 Regional Map
Figure 2 Vicinity Map
Figure 3 USGS Quadrangle Map
Figure 4 Aerial Photograph
Figure 5 CNDDB Wildlife Occurrences within 5 miles
Figure 6 CNDDB Plant Occurrences within 5 miles
Figure 7 USFWS Designated Critical Habitat
Figure 8 Soils Map
Figure 9 Photo Location Map
Figure 10 Habitat Map
Figure 1
Regional Map
^_
^_ Property Location
0 2 4 8
Miles I Scale:1:250,000 1 in = 4 miles
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 1: Regional Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig1_Regional.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Figure 2
Vicinity Map
Property Boundary
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet I Scale:1:24,000 1 inch = 2,000 feet
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 2: Vicinity Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig2_Vicinity.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Figure 3
USGS Quadrangle Map
Property Boundary
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet I Scale:1:24,000 1 inch = 2,000 feet
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 3: USGS Topographic Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig3_USGS.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Mare Island USGS 7.5' Quadrangles
38.008921, -122.289226
T02N, R04W, S15
Figure 4
Aerial Photograph
Property Boundary
0 100 200 400
Feet I Scale:1:2,400 1 inch = 200 feet
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 4: Aerial Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig4_Aerial.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Skelly
Pearce Rd.
Pavon
Rosti
Williams
San Pablo Ave.
Figure 5
CNDDB Wildlife Occurrences within 5 miles
Property Boundary
5-mile Buffer
CNDDB Wildlife
Alameda whipsnake
American peregrine falcon
California Ridgway's rail
California black rail
California red-legged frog
Cooper's hawk
Delta smelt
San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat
San Pablo song sparrow
San Pablo vole
Suisun song sparrow
Aleutian Canada goose
Foothill yellow-legged frog
Great blue heron
Longfin smelt
California monarch
Osprey
Pallid bat
Salt-marsh harvest mouse
Salt-marsh wandering shrew
Western bumble bee
Western pond turtle
Yellow-headed blackbird
0 0.75 1.5 3
Miles I Scale:1:125,000 1 in = 2 miles
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 5: CNDDB Wildlife Occurrences within 5 Miles
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig5_CNDDBWildlife.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Figure 6
CNDDB Plant Occurrences within 5 miles
Property Boundary
5-mile Buffer
CNDDB Plants
Carquinez goldenbush
Contra Costa goldfields
Delta tule pea
Diablo helianthella
Loma Prieta hoita
Mason's lilaeopsis
Santa Cruz tarplant
Bent-flowered fiddleneck
Chaparral ragwort
Fragrant fritillary
Long-styled sand-spurrey
Pallid manzanita
Soft salty bird's-beak
Western leatherwood 0 0.75 1.5 3
Miles I Scale:1:125,000 1 in = 2 miles
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 6: CNDDB Plant Occurrences within 5 Miles
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig6_CNDDBPlants.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Figure 7
USFWS Designated Critical Habitat
Property Boundary
5-mile Buffer
Alameda whipsnake
California red-legged frog
Contra Costa goldfields
Delta smelt
Soft bird's-beak
0 0.75 1.5 3
Miles I Scale:1:125,000 1 in = 2 miles
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 7: USFWS Designated Critical Habitat Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig7_CritHab.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Unit: C04A
Unit: D02D
Unit: Q122
Unit: E070
Unit: Q0GT
Figure 8
Soils Map
Cc
LcE
CoE
Property Boundary
SSURGO Soil Types
Cc: Clear Lake clay, 0 to 15 percent slopes
CoE: Cut and fill land-Millsholm complex, 9 to 30 percent slopes LcE: Lodo clay loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes
0 75 150 300
Feet I Scale:1:2,400 1 inch = 200 feet
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 8: Soils Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig8_Soils.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
Skelly
Pearce Rd.
Pavon
Rosti
Williams
San Pablo Ave.
Figure 9
Photo Location Map
°
!(°
!(
°
!(
°
!(
°
!(
!(°
!(°
!(°
°
!(
!(°
!(°
°
!( °
!(
!(°
°
!(
!(°
°
!(
!(°
°
!( !(°
°
!(
°
!(
°
!(
!(°
!(°
!(°
°
!(
°
!(
°
!(
!(°
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 13
14 15
16 17
18 19 20
21 23 22
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 Property Boundary
°
!( Photo Points
0 75 150 300
Feet I Scale:1:1,800 1 inch = 150 feet
Revision Date: 11/16/2020
Figure 9: Photo Points Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: O:\Skelly - Hercules\BRA 2020\MXDs\Fig9_Photopoints.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
12 Figure 10
Habitat Map
Survey Boundary (7.49 AC)
Habitat Type
Perennial Drainage (0.10 AC)
Developed (1.94 AC)
Eucalyptus Woodland (0.83 AC) Riparian
Woodland (0.17 AC)
Seasonal Wetland (0.034 AC)
Ruderal Grassland (4.40 AC)
0 75 150 300
Feet I Scale:1:1,800 1 inch = 150 feet
Revision Date: 12/3/2020
Figure 10: Habitat Map
Skelly Property
City of Hercules, Contra Costa County, California
Document Path: E:\Google Drive\Olberding\Skelly\MXDs\Fig10_Habitat.mxd 193 Blue Ravine Rd., Ste. 165
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 985-1188
ATTACHMENT 2
TABLES
Table 1
Plant and Wildlife Species Observed
Within/Adjacent to the Survey Area
Table 1
Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Within/Adjacent to the Survey Area Scientific Name Common Name
Plant Species Observed
Aesculus californica California buckeye
Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood acacia
Amaranthus retroflexus Rough pigweed
Anagallis arvensis Scarlet pimpernel
Asparagus officinalis Wild asparagus
Avena barbata Barbed wild oat
Avena fatua Wild oat
Baccharis pilularis Coyote brush
Brassica nigra Black mustard
Brassica rapa French breakfast mustard
Bromus catharticus Chilean brome
Bromus diandrus Ripgut brome
Bromus hordeaceus Soft chess
Carduus pycnocephalus Italian thistle
Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle
Cortaderia selloana Pampas grass
Convolvulus arvensis Field bindweed
Cupressus sempervirens Italian cypress
Croton setigerus Dove weed
Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass
Cyperus eragrostis Umbrella sedge
Dactylis glomerata Orchardgrass
Distichlis spicata Saltgrass
Dittrichia graveolens Stinkwort
Echinochloa colona Jungle rice
Echinochloa crus-galli Barnyard grass
Ehrharta erecta Upright veldt grass
Epilobium brachycarpum Panicled willowherb
Euphorbia maculata Spotted spurge
Erigeron canadensis Canada horseweed
Erodium cicutarium Filaree
Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum
Table 1
Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Within/Adjacent to the Survey Area Scientific Name Common Name
Hedera helix English ivy
Helminthotheca echioides Bristly ox-tongue
Hordeum murinum Wall barley
Juglans hindsii Northern California black walnut
Juglans regius English walnut
Lantana camara Lantana
Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce
Lactuca virosa Poison wild lettuce
Ligustricum sp. Privet
Malva neglecta Dwarf mallow
Malva nicaeensis Bull mallow
Malva parviflora Cheeseweed
Malvella leprosa Alkali mallow
Medicago sativa Alfalfa
Olea europaea Olive
Populus nigra Lombardy poplar
Pelargonium sp. Garden geranium
Phoenix sp. Date palm
Pinus canariensis Canary Island pine
Pinus sp. Ornamental pines
Plantago lanceolata English ribwort
Plantago major Common plantain
Polygonum aviculare Prostrate knotweed
Table 1
Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Within/Adjacent to the Survey Area Scientific Name Common Name
Polypogon monspeliensis Annual beard grass
Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak
Raphanus sativus Wild raddish
Robinia pseudoacacia Black locust
Rubus armeniacus Armenian blackberry
Rumex acetosella Sheep sorrel
Rumex crispus Curly dock
Rumex pulcher Fiddle dock
Salix babylonica Weeping willow
Salix laevigata Red willow
Salix lasiolepis Arroyo willow
Salsola kali Russian thistle
Salsola tragus Tumbleweed
Schinus molle Peruvian pepper tree
Sequoia sempervirens Coast redwood
Sisymbrium officinale London rocket
Salsola tragus Tumbleweed
Sonchus asper Spiny sowthistle
Sonchus oleraceus Sowthistle
Tamarix parviflora Tamarisk
Toxicodendron diversilobum Poison oak
Trifolium hybridum Alsike clover
Tropaeolum majus Garden nasturtium
Typha angustifolia Narrow-leaved cattail
Yucca gigantea Giant yucca
Animal Species Observed
Birds
Aphelocoma californica California scrub jay
Buteo jamaicensis Red-tailed hawk
Bombycilla cedrorum Cedar waxwing
Calypte anna Anna’s hummingbird
Cathartes aura Turkey vulture
Colaptes auratus Northern flicker
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
Table 1
Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Within/Adjacent to the Survey Area Scientific Name Common Name
Egretta thula Snowy egret
Junco hyemalis Dark-eyed junco
Leuconotopicus villosus Hairy woodpecker
Melanerpes formicivorus Acorn woodpecker
Melozone crissalis California towhee
Pipilo maculatus Spotted towhee
Picoides nuttallii Nuttall’s woodpecker
Poecile rufescens Chestnut-backed chickadee
Psaltriparus minimus Bushtit
Regulus calendula Ruby-crowned kinglet
Sayornis nigricans Black phoebe
Setophaga coronata Yellow-rumped warbler
Sialia mexicana Western bluebird
Spinus psaltria Lesser goldfinch
Zonotrichia atricapilla Golden-crowned sparrow
Zonotrichia leucophrys White-crowned sparrow
Mammals
Felis catus Domestic cat
Microtus californicus California vole (burrows)
Sciurus niger Eastern fox squirrel
Peromyscus spp. Mouse (burrows)
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
PLANTS
Napa False Indigo
(Amorpha californica
var.napenss)
-/-/1B April – July Openings in broad leaf upland forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Bent-flower Fiddleneck
(Amsinckia lunaris) -/-/1B March – June
Coastal bluff scrub, cismontane woodland, and valley and foothill grassland
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Pallid Manzanita
(Arctostaphylos pallida) T/E/1B December – March
Siliceous shale, sandy or gravelly soils in broad-leafed upland forest, closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland and coastal scrub.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Alkali Milk-Vetch
(Astragalus tener var. tener) -/-/1B March – June
Playas, valley and foothill, and vernal pools in alkaline soils. Micro habitat consists of low ground, alkali flats, and flooded lands
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Big-Scale Balsamroot
(Balsamorhiza macrolepis var.
macrolepis)
-/-/1B March – June Chaparral, cismontane woodland, and valley and foothills grasslands, sometimes in serpentinite outcrops.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Sonoma Sunshine
(Blennosperma bakeri) E/E/1B March – May
Wetlands, vernal pools, freshwater wetlands, valley
grasslands and wetland-riparian
Low
Suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Big Tarplant
(Blepharizonia plumosa) -/-/1B.1 July – October Valley and foothill grassland on clay soils.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Mount Diablo Fairy-Lantern
(Calochortus pulchellus) -/-/1B April – June
Chaparral, cismontane woodland, riparian woodland, and
valley and foothill grassland; on wooded and brushy
slopes.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Tiburon Mariposa Lily
(Calochortus tiburonensis)
T/T/1B May – June Open, rocky slopes in serpentine grassland.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Coastal Bluff MorningGlory (Calystegia
purpurata ssp. Saxicola)
-/-/1B May – September Coastal dunes and scrub.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Lyngbye’s Sedge
(Carex lyngbyei) -/-/2B April – August Wetlands, coastal and salt-marsh, coastal salt marsh and wetland-riparian.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Tiburon Indian Paintbrush
(Castilleja affinis ssp. neglecta) E/T/1B April – June Rocky serpentine sites in valley and foothill grassland.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Congdon’s Tarplant
(Centromadia parryi ssp.
congdonii)
-/-/1B May – October Valley and foothill grasslands in alkaline soils. Low No nearby CNDDB Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Pappose Tarplant
(Centromadia parryi ssp. parryi) -/-/1B.2 May – November Often alkaline. Chaparral, Coastal prairie, meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps (coastal salt), valley and
foothill grassland (vernally mesic).
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Point Reyes Salty Bird’s-Beak
(Chloropyron maritimum ssp.
palustre)
-/-/1B June – October Annual herb occurring in coastal salt marshes and swamps.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Soft Salty Bird’s Beak
(Chloropyron molle ssp. molle) E/R/1B July – November Coastal salt marsh, wetland-riparian.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Bolander’s Water-Hemlock
(Cicuta maculata var. bolanderi) -/-/2B July – September Coastal, salt marsh and wetland riparian.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Franciscan Thistle
(Cirsium andrewsii) -/-/1B March – July Grassy and riparian areas in seeps, wet areas, watercourse edges. Typically, along coastlines.
Low
No nearby CNDDB Presumed absent
Suisun Thistle
(Cirsium hydrophilum var.
hydrophilum)
E/-/1B July – September Salt marshes and swamps.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Western Leatherwood
(Dirca occidentalis) -/-/1B January – March
Mesic areas of broad-leafed upland forest, closed-cone
coniferous forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland, north coast coniferous forest, riparian forest and riparian
woodland.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Dwarf Downingia
(Downingia pusilla) -/-/2B March – May Mesic valley and foothill grasslands, vernal pools.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Tiburon Buckwheat
(Eriogonum luteolum var.
caninum)
-/-/1B June – September Serpentine soils in chaparral, coastal prairie, valley and foothill grassland.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Jepson’s Coyote-Thistle
(Eryngium jepsonii) -/-/1B April − August Clay soils. Valley and foothill grasslands. Vernal pools.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
San Joaquin Spearscale
(Extriplex joaquinana) -/-/1B April-October
Chenopod scrub, meadows and seeps, playas, valley and
foothill grassland in seasonal alkali wetlands or alkali sink scrub with Distichlis spicata, Frankenia, etc.
Low
No nearby CNDDB Presumed absent
Minute Pocket Moss
(Fissidens pauperculus) -/-/1B - North Coast coniferous forest in damp coastal soil.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Fragrant Fritillary
(Fritillaria liliacea) -/-/1B February – April Cismontane woodland, coastal prairie, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands, often in serpentine soils.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Diablo Helianthella
(Helianthella castanea) -/-/1B March – June
Broad-leafed upland forest, chaparral, cismontane
woodland, coastal scrub, riparian woodland, valley and
foothill grassland. Usually in chaparral/oak woodland
interface in rocky, azonal soils, often in partial shade.
Low
Suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
Marin Western Flax
(Hesperolinon congestum) T/T/1B April – July Serpentine areas in chaparral, valley and foothill grassland.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
Santa Cruz Tarplant
(Holocarpha macradenia) T/E/1B June – October
Coastal prairie, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands, often with clay, sandy soils; often with nonnatives. low
Suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
Loma Prieta Hoita
(Hoita strobilina) -/-/1B May – October Chaparral, cismontane woodland, riparian woodland, usually in mesic, serpentine soils.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Carquinez Goldenbush
(Isocoma arguta) -/-/1B August – December Alkaline valley and foothill grassland.
Low
Surveyed during
blooming period
Presumed absent
Contra Costa Goldfields
(Lasthenia conjugens) E/-/1B March – June
Valley and foothill grassland, cismontane woodland, and vernal pools, swales, and low depressions in open grassy areas.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Delta Tule Pea
(Lathyrus jepsonii var. jepsonii) -/-/1B May – July Freshwater wetlands, wetland-riparian, freshwater marsh, brackish marsh.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Legenere
(Legenere limosa) -/-/1B April – June Occurs in wetlands, vernal-pools, freshwater wetlands, valley grassland and wetland-riparian.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Jepson’s Leptosiphon
(Leptosiphon jepsonii) -/-/1B March – May Open or partially shaded grassy slopes.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Mason’s Lilaeopsis
(Lilaeopsis masonii) -/R/1B April – November Freshwater wetland, wetland-riparian, freshwater marsh or brackish marsh.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Delta Mudwort
(Limosella australis) -/-/2B May – August Marshes and swamps (freshwater or brackish), riparian scrub. Usually found on mud banks.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Oregon Meconella
(Meconella oregana) -/-/1B March – April Coastal prairie, coastal scrub. Low No suitable habitat Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
White-Rayed Pentachaeta
(Pentachaeta bellidiflora) E/E/1B March – May Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. Often serpentine.
Low
No suitable habitat
Present
Presumed absent
Hairless Popcorn-Flower
(Plagiobothrys glaber) -/-/1A March – May Meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps, coastal salt marshes and alkaline meadows.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Marin Knotweed
(Polygonum marinense) -/-/3
(April) May – August
(October)
Months in parentheses are
uncommon
Coastal salt and brackish marshes and swamps.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Chaparral Ragwort
(Senecio aphanactis) -/-/2 January – April Cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, drying alkaline flats, chaparral.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Long-Styled Sand Spurrey
(Spergularia macrotheca
longistyla)
-/-/1B February – May Alkaline meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Tiburon Jewelflower
(Streptanthus glandulosus ssp.
niger)
E/E/1B May – June Shallow rocky serpentine slopes in valley and foothill grassland.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
California Seablite
(Suaeda californica) E/-/1B July – October Marshes and swamps, margins of coastal salt marshes.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Suisun Marsh Aster
(Symphyotrichum lentum) -/-/1B March – November Freshwater and brackish marsh.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Two Fork Clover
(Trifolium amoenum) E/-/1B April – June Coastal bluff scrub, valley and foothill grassland.
Sometimes serpentine.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Saline Clover
(Trifolium hydrophilum) -/-/1B April – June Marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grasslands with mesic, alkaline soils, and vernal pools.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Coastal Triquetrella
(Triquetrella california) -/-/1B - Coastal bluff scrub and coastal scrub.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Oval-Leaved Viburnum
(Viburnum ellipticum) -/-/2B May – June Chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
BIRDS
Cooper’s Hawk
(Accipiter cooperii) -/CP/- February – August Oak woodlands, coniferous forests, riparian corridors.
Often hunts on edges between habitats.
High
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
Tricolored Blackbird
(Agelaius tricolor) SOC/-/SSC February – August
Nesting within seasonal wetland marshes, blackberry
brambles or other protected substrates. Forages in annual grassland and wetland habitats.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Cackling Goose
(Aleutian Canada)
(Branta hutchinsii leucopareia)
D/-/- Late Fall – Winter
Winters on lakes and inland prairies. Forages on natural pasture or that cultivated to grain; loafs on lakes,
reservoirs, and ponds.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Burrowing Owl
(Athene cunicularia)
-/SC/ February – August Dry open annual or perennial grassland, desert and scrubland. Uses abandoned mammal burrows for nesting.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Golden Eagle
(Aquila chrysaetos)
FP/CP/- February – August
Nests in cliff-walled canyons and tall trees in open areas. (Nesting and wintering) Rolling foothills mountain areas, sage-juniper flats, and desert.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Great Egret
(Ardea alba) ROOKERIES
-/-/- February – August
Freshwater, brackish and marine wetlands. Form breeding colonies on lakes, ponds, marshes, estuaries or islands.
Forage in marshes, swamps, streams rivers, ponds, tidal flats, canals and flooded fam fields.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Great Blue Heron
(Ardea herodias) ROOKERIES
-/-/- February – August
Saltwater and freshwater habitats from open coasts,
marshes, sloughs, riverbanks, and lakes to small ponds.
Also forage in grasslands and agricultural fields.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Short-Eared Owl
(Asio flammeus)
-/-/SSC February – August
Open areas with low vegetation, including prairie and
coastal grasslands, meadows, savannah, tundra, marshes, dunes and agricultural areas.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Red-Tailed Hawk
(Buteo jamaicensis)
-/CP/- February – August Various grassland habitats, urban land, oak woodlands with grassland for foraging.
High
Suitable habitat
present
Present
Foraging capacity
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Red-shouldered Hawk
(Buteo lineatus)
-/CP/- February – August
Forages in variety of semi-developed habitats including orchards. Forages in woodlands and riparian areas. Nests in riparian habitat but also eucalyptus groves.
High
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
Ferruginous Hawk
(Buteo regalis) -/CP/- Late Fall – Winter
Open country such as semiarid grasslands with few trees, rocky outcrops, and open valleys. Also, along streams or in agricultural areas during migration.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Swainson’s Hawk
(Buteo swainsoni)
-/T/- February – October
Nests in riparian areas and in oak savannah near foraging areas. Forages in alfalfa and grain fields with rodent
populations.
Low
Suitable habitat
preset
Not likely to
occur
Western Snowy Plover
(Charadrius alexandrinus
nivosus)
T/-/SSC February – August
Sandy beaches, salt pond levees, shores of large alkali lakes. Requires sandy, gravelly, or friable soils for
nesting.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Northern Harrier
(Circus hudsonius)
-/-/SSC February – August
Nests in grasslands and marshlands, ground nesting bird. (Nesting) Coastal salt and freshwater marsh. Nest and
forage in grasslands, from salt grass in desert sink to mountain cienagas. Nests on ground in shrubby vegetation, usually at marsh edge; nest built of a large mound of sticks in wet areas.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Yellow Rail
(Coturnicops noveboracensis)
-/-/SSC February – August Salt or brackish marshes or wet meadows. Prefers habitats with tall, dense vegetation such as sedges or cattails.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Snowy Egret
(Egretta thula) ROOKERIES -/-/- February – August
Found along the coast but breed in inland wetlands. Nest on thick vegetation in barrier islands, saltmarsh islands, swamps or marshes.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
White-Tailed Kite
(Elanus leucurus) SOC/CP/FP February – August Various grassland habitats, urban land, oak woodlands with grassland for foraging.
High
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
American Peregrine Falcon
(Falco peregrinus anatum) -/-/FP February – August Nests near wetlands, lakes, rivers, or other water. On cliffs, banks, dunes, mounds, and human-made structures.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Saltmarsh Common Yellowthroat
(Geothlypis trichas sinuosa) SOC/-/SSC February – August Fresh and saltwater marshes of the San Francisco Bay area.
Forages in thick, continuous vegetation down to water
surface. Nests in tall grasses, tule patches, and willows.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) -/E/FP January – July Wetland habitats such as coasts, rivers, lakes or marshes.
Uses large mature conifers or hardwood trees for nesting.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Caspian Tern
(Hydroprogne caspia)
-/-/- April – June Wetland habitats such as coasts, rivers and lakes. Utilize flat open areas with little vegetation for nesting.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
California Black Rail
(Laterallus jamaicensis
coturniculus)
-/T/FP February – July
Inhabits shallow salt and freshwater marshes. Nests in
upland areas of salt marshes, shallow freshwater marshes, wet meadows and flooded grassy vegetation.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Suisun Song Sparrow
(Melospiza melodia maxillaris)
-/-/SC February – August Inhabits tidal salt marshes, needs vegetation for nesting sites.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Alameda Song Sparrow
(Melospiza melodia pusillula)
-/-/SSC February – August
Resident of salt marshes bordering south arm of San
Francisco Bay, inhabits Salicornia marshes, nests low in Grindelia bushes (high enough to escape high tides) and in Salicornia.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
San Pablo Song Sparrow
(Melospiza melodia samuelis)
-/-/SSC February – August
Tidal and muted tidal salt marshes fringing San Pablo Bay in the northern reaches of the San Francisco Bay estuary.
Inhabits California cord grass, pickleweed, and gum plant.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Black-Crowned Night Heron
(Nycticorax nycticorax)
ROOKERIES
-/-/- February – August
Inhabits wetlands including saltmarshes, freshwater
marshes, swamps, streams, rivers, lakes, canals and tidal mudflats.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Osprey
(Pandion halietus)
-/-/WL February – August
Inhabit areas near bodies of water such as saltmarshes, rivers, ponds, reservoirs and estuaries. Large nests are places on open poles, channel markers, or dead trees and are often over water.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Double-Crested Cormorant
(Phalacrocorax auratus)
-/-/WL February – August Seek large bodies of water. Inhabit coasts, inland lakes, freshwater marshes and saltmarshes.
Low
Suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
California Ridgeway’s Rail
(Rallus obsoletus obsoletus)
E/E/- February – August Salt to brackish-water marshes with tidal sloughs in San Francisco Bay area. Found in dense pickleweed.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Bank Swallow
(Riparia riparia)
FP/T/SC April – August
Low areas along rivers, streams, ocean coasts, and
reservoirs. They utilize vertical cliffs or banks and sand or gravel quarries or road cuts to nest.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Yellow-Headed Blackbird
(Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus) -/-/SSC February – August Breed in wetlands in prairies, mountain meadows, and
shallow areas of marshes, ponds and rivers. Nest in
cattails, bulrush, or reeds often alongside red-winged
blackbirds. Forage in grasslands, croplands, or savannah.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
MAMMALS
Pallid Bat
(Antrozous pallidus) -/SC/- N/A
Forages in grasslands, shrublands, deserts, forests, and woodlands. Most common in open, dry habitats. Roosts
in rock crevices, caves, tree hollows, and buildings.
Roosts must protect bats from high temperatures; very
sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites.
High
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat
(Corynorhinus townsendii) -/-/SC Resident
Throughout California in a wide variety of habitats; roosts in the open, hanging from walls and ceilings. Needs sites free from human disturbance. Most common in mesic
sites.
High
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
Berkeley Kangaroo Rat
(Dipodomys heermanni
berkeleyensis)
-/-/- Resident
Open grassy hilltops and open spaces in chaparral and blue oak/digger pine woodlands; needs fine, deep, well-drained soil for burrowing.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Silver-Haired Bat
(Lasionycteris noctivagans) -/-/SSC Resident
Primarily a coastal and montane forest dweller feeding
over streams, ponds, and open brushy areas. Roosts in
hollow trees, beneath exfoliating bark, abandoned
woodpecker holes, and rarely under rocks. Needs drinking water.
Moderate
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
Hoary Bat
(Lasiurus cinereus) -/-/- Resident
Prefers open habitats or habitat mosaics with access to trees for cover and open areas or habitat edges for feeding.
Roosts in dense foliage of medium to large trees near
water. Feeds mainly on moths.
High
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
San Pablo Vole
(Microtus californicus
sanpabloensis)
-/-/SSC Resident Salt marshes of San Pablo Creek and on the south shore of San Pablo Bay.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Yuma Myotis
(Myotis yumanensis) -/-/SC Resident
Optimal habitats are open forests and woodlands with
sources of water over which to feed. Maternal colonies
occur in caves, mines, buildings or crevices.
High
No suitable habitat
present
May occur
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
San Francisco
Dusky-Footed Woodrat
(Neotoma fuscipes annectens)
-/SC/- Resident
Forest habitats of moderate canopy and moderate to dense understory, may prefer chaparral and redwood habitats.
Nests constructed of grass, leaves, sticks, feathers, etc.
Population may be limited by availability of nest materials.
Low
Suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
Big Free-Tailed Bat
(Nyctinomops macrotis) -/-/SSC Resident
Low-lying arid areas in southern California. Need high
cliffs or rocky outcrops for roosting sites. Feeds principally on large moths.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse
(Reithrodontomys raviventris) E/E/FP Resident Salt marshes with dense stands of pickleweed and other dense wetland vegetation such as cattails or bullrush.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Suisun Shrew
(Sorex ornatus sinuosus)
-/-/SSC Resident
Tidal marshes of the northern shores of San Pablo and
Suisun Bays. Require dense low-lying cover and drift
weed and other litter above the mean high tide line for nesting and foraging.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Salt Marsh Wandering Shrew
(Sorex vagrans halicoetes) -/-/SSC Resident Tidal salt marsh habitat with dense cover from Salicornia and other tidal plant species.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
American Badger
(Taxidea taxus)
-/-/SSC Resident
Shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats with friable soils to dig burrows. Need open, uncultivated ground. Prey on
fossorial mammals.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
AMPHIBIAN
California Red-Legged Frog
(Rana draytonii) T/-/SC May 1 – November 1
Lowlands and foothills in or near permanent deep water
with dense, shrubby or emergent riparian habitat. Requires 11-20 weeks of permanent water for breeding and larval
development. Must have access to aestivation habitat.
Low
Suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
California Tiger Salamander
(Ambystoma californiense) T/T/-
Aquatic Surveys - Once
each in March, April, and
May with at least 10 days
between surveys.
Upland Surveys - 20 nights
of surveying under proper
conditions beginning
October 15 and ending
March 15.
Vernal pools, swales and depressions for breeding, needs underground refugia.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog
(Rana boylii) SOC/-/SC Year-round resident
Partially-shaded, shallow streams and riffles with a rocky substrate in a variety of habitats. Need cobble for egglaying.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
REPTILE
Western Pond Turtle
(Emys marmorata) -/SSC/- March – October Aquatic turtle needs permanent water in ponds, streams, irrigation ditches. Nests on sandy banks or grassy fields.
Low
Suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
Alameda Whipsnake
(Masticophis lateralis
euryxanthus)
T/T/- Year-round resident
Valley-foothill hardwood habitat of the coast ranges
between Monterey and north San Francisco Bay areas.
Inhabits south-facing slopes and ravines where shrubs
form a vegetative mosaic with oak trees and grasses.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
INVERTEBRATES
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
(Branchinecta lynchi)
T/-/-
December – May
(dependent on the timing
of winter and spring rains)
Endemic to the grasslands of the central valley, central coast mountains, and south coast mountains, in astatic rainfilled pools. Inhabits small, clear-water sandstonedepression pools and grassed swale, earth slump, or basaltflow depression pools.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
California Linderiella
(Linderiella occidentalis)
SOC/-/-
December – May
(dependent on the timing
of winter and spring rains)
Seasonal pools in unplowed grasslands with old alluvial soils underlain by hardpan or in sandstone depressions.
Water in the pools has very low alkalinity and
conductivity.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
California Freshwater Shrimp
(Syncaris pacifica)
E/T/- Resident Perennially flowing streams and slow-moving water and flat gradients.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
Western Bumble Bee
(Bombus occidentalis) -/SC/- Resident
Utilize meadows rich with flowers. Open-canopy habitats that allow for flower growth. Nest underground in rodent burrows.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Monarch Butterfly
(Danaus plexippus)
WINTER ROOSTS
-/-/- October – March
Winter roosts along coast from northern Mendocino to
Baja California, Mexico. Roosts in wind-protected groves of eucalyptus, Monterey pine, and cypress with nectar and water sources nearby.
Moderate
Suitable habitat
present
May occur
Bridge’s Coast Range
Shoulderband (snail)
(Helminthoglypta nickliniana
bridgesi)
SOC/-/- Year-round Resident Inhabits open hillsides of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, tends to colonize under tall grasses and weeds.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Valley Elderberry
Longhorn Beetle
(Desmocerus californicus
dimorphus)
T/-/- Resident
Found in association with blue elderberry (Sambucus
exicana) only in the riparian forests of the Central Valley of California from Shasta County to Kern County.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Callippe Silverspot Butterfly
(Speyeria callippe callippe) E/-/- May – July
Johnny jump-up (Viola pedunculata) is the host plant for this species. Occurs in grassland habitat near south San Francisco, the hills above Pleasanton, Sear Point in the North Bay, and in spots between Vallejo and Cordelia.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
FISH
Sacramento Perch
(Archopilates interruptus)
E/E/SOC Year-round Resident
Sloughs, slow moving rivers and large lakes, including
floodplains lakes of the Central Valley. High alkalinity and salinity waters.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Not likely to
occur
Delta Smelt
(Hypomesus transpacificus) T/E/- Year-round Resident
Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta and seasonally in Suisun
Bay, Carquinez Straight and San Pablo Bay. Seldom at
salinities greater than 10 ppt.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Steelhead (Central California
Coast DSP)
(Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus
T/E/- Year-round Resident
Russian River south to Aptos Creek. Within the San
Francisco Bay Estuary, they are found in the Guadalupe
and Napa Rivers and San Leandro, San Lorenzo, Coyote,
San Francisquito, San Mateo and Alameda creeks.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
Sacramento Splittail
(Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) -/-/SC Resident
Found in the Delta, Suisun Bay, and associated marshes.
Microhabitat is slow-moving rivers, dead end sloughs.
Spawning habitat and foraging habitat for young is flooded vegetation.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Longfin Smelt
(Spirinchus thaleichthys) -/T/- Resident
Found in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary systems.
Spawning occurs in fresh water, over sandy-gravel
substrates, rocks, and aquatic plants. Anadromous
populations spawn in freshwater close to the ocean. After hatching, larvae move up into the surface waters and are transported downstream into brackish-water nursery areas.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Eulachon
(Thaleichthys pacificus) T/T/- Resident Spend most of their life in the ocean, return to coastal natal freshwater streams and rivers to spawn.
Low
No suitable habitat
present
Presumed absent
Table 2
Special-Status Species for the Mare Island, Sears Point, Cuttings Wharf, Cordelia, Benicia, Briones Valley, Richmond, San Quentin, and Petaluma Point 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Maps1 Common Name/Scientific
Name
Status
(Fed/State/
CNPS)2
Blooming or Survey
Period Habitats of Occurrence
Potential on
Site
Status on
Site**
1. Special-status plants and animals as reported by the California Natural Diversity Data Base, California Native Plant Society, and other background research November 2020
2. Order of Codes for Plants - Fed/State/CNPS
Order of Codes for Animals - Fed/State/CDFW
Codes:
SOC - Federal Species of Concern
SC - California Species of Special Concern
E - Federally/State Listed as an Endangered Species
T - Federally/State Listed as a Threatened Species
C - Species listed as a Candidate for Federal Threatened or Endangered Status R - Rare
D - Delisted
CP- California protected
FP - State Fully Protected
DFG: SC California Special Concern species
1B - California Native Plant Society considers the plant Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and elsewhere. 1A - CNPS Plants presumed extinct in California.
2 - CNPS Plants Rare, Threatened or Endangered in California, but more common elsewhere. 3 - CNPS Plants on a review list to find more information about a particular species. 4 - CNPS Plants of limited distribution - a watch list.
ATTACHMENT 3
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
1. Facing southwest, the photo depicts an overview of the southeastern portion of the Property, and a portion of the ruderal grassland habitat. This section of the Property appears to have been disked recently.
2. Facing south, the photo shows the cell tower and associated utilities located in the southeastern corner of the Property.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
3. Facing northwest, the photo shows one of several vacant horse stables located throughout the Property.
4. Facing west, the photo depicts the riparian woodland habitat and part of the eucalyptus woodland habitat, along with several vacant structures remaining on the Property.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
5. Facing west, the photo shows the eastern portion of the perennial drainage feature. Several large blue gum eucalyptus trees form a lush canopy along the southern section of the Property with an understory of dense Himalayan blackberry.
6. Facing east, the photo depicts the southeastern portion of the Property and one of several sheds present on the site.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
7. The perennial drainage flows along the southern boundary of the Property, and is surrounded by a dense cover of Himalayan blackberry. Photo facing northeast.
8. Facing southeast, the photo shows the perennial drainage on the Property, surrounded by an understory of English ivy. Water was present in this feature during the time of the survey.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
9. Facing west, the photo shows the western portion of the perennial drainage. Vegetation such as narrow-leaved cattail, and umbrella sedge can be seen growing within the drainage.
10. Facing east, the photo depicts part of the ruderal grassland habitat, and the water storage tank present on the Property. The large trees present within the riparian woodland habitat on the right-hand side of the photo are ideal for nesting birds and raptors.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
11. Facing northeast, the photo shows and overview of the ruderal grassland habitat. This section of the Property was previously a paddock.
12. Facing south, the photo shows a section of the riparian woodland habitat, and dense understory surrounding the perennial drainage feature.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
13. Facing southwest, the photo shows the southwestern corner of the Property, and the adjacent public walking trail.
14. Facing northeast, the photo shows a portion of the concrete v-ditch located just outside the western boundary of the Property. This feature did not contain water during the time of the survey, and was just outside the Property boundary.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
15. Facing southeast, the photo shows a portion of the western boundary of the Property. The concrete v-ditch lies just outside of the Property boundary and is pictured here covered in ruderal vegetation and Himalayan blackberry.
16. Facing east, the photo shows an overview of the potential seasonal wetland habitat adjacent to the vacant horse stall and paddock.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
17. Facing west, the photo shows an overview of the northeastern portion of the Property. Much of this area is developed, and consisted of a gravel and asphalt driveway and parking area, along with a vacant hay storage barn.
18. Facing southeast, the photo depicts the northeastern corner of the Property.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
19. Facing southeast, the photo shows the asphalt driveway onto the Property from Skelly. Large eucalyptus trees line the driveway and comprise the eucalyptus woodland habitat.
20. Facing south, the photo shows one of many vacant horse paddocks and stalls, along with several small storage sheds and outbuildings.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
21. Facing southwest, the photo shows several vacant livestock barns, stalls, and paddocks. The vacant residence on the Property can be seen in the background.
22. Facing southwest, the photo shows a close up of one of several vacant horse stalls on the Property.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
23. Facing northwest, the photo depicts one of the large vacant barns on the Property.
24. Facing southeast, the photo depicts several of the large eucalyptus trees that line the driveway to the Property.
These large trees could provide potential nesting habitat for raptors and other avian species.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
25. Facing northwest, the photo shows several additional outbuildings and vacant barns that are present throughout the Property.
26. Facing north, the photo shows a vacant horse stall, surrounded by ornamental trees from the adjacent residence.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
27. Facing northwest, the photo shows an overview of the vacant residence surrounded by ornamental trees and shrubs.
28. Facing southwest, the photo shows a large ornamental date palm and a small storage shed located south of the vacant residence.
Skelly Property – November 11, 2020
29. Facing southwest, the photo shows several additional vacant livestock stalls, adjacent to the perennial drainage.
30. Facing northeast, the photo depicts a horse stall, and small shed on the Property. The vacant residence can be seen in the background.
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
B.3 - Arborist Report
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
TREES, BUGS, DIRT
LANDSCAPE CONSULTING & TRAINING
ARBORIST REPORT
215 Skelly - Hercules CA
March 31, 2022
Prepared For: D.R. Horton
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100
San Ramon CA
PO Box 311, Orinda CA 94563 [email protected] - email 925.254.7950 – Phone D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY 3 ...............................................................
INTRODUCTION 3 ....................................................
PURPOSE AND USE 3 ...................................................
ASSIGNMENT 3 ..............................................................
LIMITS OF ASSIGNMENT 3 ............................................
BACKGROUND 3 ...........................................................
METHODS 4 ...................................................................
OBSERVATIONS ..5 ....................................................
LOCATION 5 ...................................................................
SETTING 5 ......................................................................
TREE DATA 5 ..................................................................
ANALYSIS 5-6 ..............................................................
TREE ATTRIBUTES & HAZARDS 5-6 ..............................
IMPACTS ON TREES FROM PROPOSED GRADING 6 ....
RECOMMENDATIONS 6-8 ..........................................
APPENDICES 9-48 ........................................................
APPENDIX A – DATA 9-16 ................................................
APPENDIX B - SPECIES DISTRIBUTION 17 ...................
APPENDIX C - ATTRIBUTES, HAZARDS, FAILURE.. 18-27
APPENDIX D - GRADING IMPACTS 28-33 .......................
APPENDIX E - RECOMMENDATIONS 34-42 ....................
APPENDIX F - PRESERVATION MEASURES 43-44 ..........
APPENDIX G - GLOSSARY 45 ..........................................
APPENDIX H – LOCATION MAPS ...........................46-47 APPENDIX I - CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE 48 ...
@Trees, Bugs, Dirt 2022. All rights reserved. This report, dated Thursday, March 31, 2022 is for the exclusive and confidential use of Trees, Bugs, Dirt clients and their representatives for this project only, and shall not be reproduced in whole or in part on other occasions without the written permission of Michael Baefsky.
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 2 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
SUMMARY
Ninety five trees are inventoried on site or near property borders, with trunk diameters greater than or equal to twelve inches, qualifying them as “mature” in the City of Hercules. Trunk diameters of trees range from 12.1 to 118.5, averaging 30.9 Tree health and structure ranges from very poor to good, averaging fair-poor. Tree form ranges from very poor to excellent, averaging fair=poor. Seventy two trees are located on site, the other twenty three are offsite. Tree attributes include providing habitat for bird cavity nesting and bird perching, soil erosion control, biological diversity, wind screening, pollinator habitat, and visual interest. Fire hazards include dead trees, bark debris, species, low branches, dead branches, dead trunks, entire trees, with many trees posing minimal fire hazards. Branch, trunk and root failures are likely to occur in the coming year unless mitigation measures are implemented. Proposed grading will impact trees based on location of the grading and tree condition, consequences include loss (sixty five trees), increased likelihood of failure (twenty three trees), decline (two trees), reduced health (three trees), & no impact (five trees). I recommend preserving eighteen trees, clearing soil from root crown, ensuring drainage away from tree trunks, raising crowns to reduce fire hazard, protecting trunks, air spading and pruning roots. Only one of the trees to be preserved (#66) has a trunk that is located on site, another tree to be preserved (#40) has crown (canopy) and roots on site in an area proposed for an emergency access road.
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE AND USE
This report is intended to provide information for the Client and the City of Hercules as part of a development permit, for use in guiding tree removal and preservation..
ASSIGNMENT
I was hired by D.R. Horton (Client), to measure, map, digitally image, inventory & evaluate trees at the 215 Skelly, Hercules, and to provide an Arborist Report that includes a summary of my observations, recommendations & tree locations.
LIMITS OF ASSIGNMENT
•Did not evaluate trees below ground or aerially, nor use invasive or destructive methods to assess health •Did not evaluate trees less than twelve inches diameter •Only three trees were surveyed for their precise locations, the others were located approximately •No tree replacement plan provided
BACKGROUND
The City of Hercules Municipal Code allows the removal of mature trees in conjunction with development (Chapter 15, Section 4-15.05), as long as their is compliance with a Grading Permit, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, tree replacement plan, and pre-development activities are consistent with the City’s General Plan.
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 3 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
METHODS
On January 4-5 I met with Mr. Adam Foster (Client Representative) identified tree species, measured trunk circumferences at 4.6 feet above grade, tagged trunks with numbered tags, located trees visually on a site map, digitally imaged trees and assessed their health, structural quality and form. Mr. Foster provided documents related to the project trees, including the latest updated grading plan. According to Mr. Foster, grading of lots will be significant, and improvement of existing access road will be limited. Three trees were surveyed to verify their precise locations & survivability given proposed construction.
Documents used:
•US Soil Survey, Standard Soil Series Descriptions, Oregon State University •A.L.T.A./N.S.P.S. Land Title Survey, CBG 7/30/2020
•Vesting Tentative Map, Existing Conditions, CBG March 2022 •Preliminary Application Lotting Plan, CBG 11/2021
•Preliminary Development Plan, CBG 1/2022
•Preliminary Grading Utility Plan, CBG 1/2022
•City of Hercules Municipal Code, Chapter 15, Removal of Mature Trees Measurements & Calculations:
•Trunk circumferences measured at 4.6 feet above grade, using a steel tape measure or a Biltmore stick •Multiple trunks are combined, and reported as (cumulative) diameter •Trunk circumferences divided by 3.14 to calculate diameter, and rounded off to one significant digit Health Structure & Form Evaluation Standards
+numerical rating system; zero (dead), one (very poor), two (poor), three (fair), four (good) and five (excellent)
+ form assessed by rating specimens on their deviance from the norm for the species in this region, visual qualities such as attractiveness, and engineering functions such as screening, shading and creating views +qualitative descriptions and items assessed for health & structure include •rooting zone - bare, mulched, limited space, weeds, competing vegetation, moisture, debris •root crown region (trunk & root junction) - buried, clear, pests, diseases, wet, wounds, cavities •trunk - taper, lack of taper, wounds, lean, growth cracks, stress cracks, pests, diseases, wounds •scaffold (large, major) branches - taper, distribution of branches, strength of branch connections, wounds, pests
•smaller branches - distribution, size, amount, strength of connections, pests, diseases •twigs - annual growth, color, size, distribution, dead/live •foliage - color, size, distribution, pests, diseases, leaf fall Trees, Bugs, Dirt 4 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
OBSERVATIONS
LOCATION
The site is located at the end of Skelly, Hercules CA.
SETTING
The site slopes gradually from a hilltop with fenced off cell tower on the southeast corner, to lower relatively level areas in the northwest corner. A paved driveway marks the east side of the property, with houses located past a v-ditch and up a steep slope on both east and north, along with two houses above the west side on similar slopes with v-ditches below. The south side of the property also has a drainage ditch past the property line, and a steep slope up to a railroad bed. Abandoned stalls, sheds, barns, and a house spread are present on the property interior. Soils in the area of the site are mapped as Clear Lake & Lodo series. On site borings noted silty sand textured soils on top of clay. Clear Lake series are poorly drained soils with most roots concentrated in the top 19 inches. Lodo series are shaly clay loam textured and generally only 0-7 inches deep above hard shale bedrock.
DATA - See Appendix A for Tree Data, Appendix B for Tree Species Distribution •95 trees measured, evaluated, tagged, digitally imaged & located within site or near property lines •20 genera, 19 species identified
•trunk diameters of trees range from 12.1 to 118.5, averaging 30.9 •tree health and structure ranges from very poor to good, averaging fair-poor •tree form ranges from very poor to excellent, averaging fair-poor
ANALYSIS
ATTRIBUTES - See Appendix C
•Habitat for bird cavity nesting is an attribute of older trees that have cavities, wounds, or dead areas that are attractive to birds that build nests in dead areas of tree branches and trunks, CA black walnut and blue gum eucalyptus trees were two species with noticeable cavities providing this attribute •Bird perching is particularly important for large predatory and scavenger birds, and is most pronounced in large live, dead or dying trees, though trees of all sizes and conditions are used for perching •Soil erosion is most pronounced on disturbed slopes, primarily the slopes below existing backyard walls above the site, and is controlled by root and crown growth of trees on and next to those slopes, and is provided primarily by blackwood acacia and coast live oak on and around this site •Biological diversity is highest in our region when indigenous trees like yellow willow, coast live oak, and CA buckeye are present, though all species contribute to some of this attribute. •Wind screening on this site is mainly provided by large blue gum eucalyptus trees, and is important in Hercules due to high winds experienced throughout the year •Pollinator habitat is provided by all species evaluated on site •Visual interest is in the eye of the beholder, and the CA pepper trees seem to have the most interesting and unique forms on this site, and have been historically pruned and maintained for this attribute Trees, Bugs, Dirt 5 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
FIRE HAZARDS - See Appendix C
•Dead trees are more flammable than live trees, and also can be a source of fire spreading to other trees •Bark debris, primarily from blue gum eucalyptus, is present in large amounts on site, and is a likely ignition source
•Species generally noted as undesirable due to potential flammability include blue gum eucalyptus, leyland cypress, and Monterey cypress, though many variables affect flammability of tree species especially irrigation, pruning, and mulch cleanup
•Low branches from the ground to six feet in height is considered a potential fire ladder •Dead branches and trunks will burn more rapidly than live LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURE - See Appendix C
In the coming one year time frame I identified possible (abnormal or extreme weather), probable (normal weather), and improbable likelihood of failure of branches, trunks, roots, and entire trees. Most probable & possible failures are branch failures, which can be mitigated by professional pruning. Trunk failure likelihood increases when trunks are decayed or otherwise damaged. Root failures occur on slopes that are eroding or show evidence of rotten roots.
IMPACTS ON TREES FROM PROPOSED GRADING
Proposed grading will be within tree fall zones, driplines, and trunks, as well as outside of those areas, causing the loss of sixty five trees, and reducing balance, roots and tree crowns, as well as impacting trunks and health of all but five of the mature trees inventoried.
RECOMMENDATIONS
I recommend preserving eighteen trees and removing seventy six trees based on the current grading plan.
PRESERVATION MEASURES
•Clear soil from root crown regions and ensure positive drainage away from trunks •Raise crowns to reduce fire hazard
•Air spade and root prune along edges of designated setbacks from trees to be preserved •Install tree protection chain-link fencing anchored in the ground & maintain fencing till landscape phase •Any and all activity needed within fenced zones require professional supervision by consulting arborist to minimize negative impacts on trees
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 6 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
TREE PROTECTION ZONES - areas surrounding trees that shall not be accessed until project complete Areas to be fenced prior to demolition through finished landscaping are represented in radial feet from trunks. These zones shall be fenced off after other preservation measures are completed. No storage, access, or activity is allowed with tree protection zones during all construction phases.
FENCING
• Six feet tall, chain link fencing anchored in the soil • Precise location to be determined by consulting arborist on site for each individual tree on site, prior to demolition
AIR SPADING AND ROOT PRUNING
Trees located in close proximity to proposed construction • Prior to demolition the rooting zones trees with construction within five feet of driplines shall be delineated with orange or white spray paint on the ground • Air spade excavation shall be implemented along the outside pained line, down to the bottom of root depth
• Root pruning, using sharp tools, shall occur for all roots exposed, roots covered and kept wet till backfilled, followed by installation of protective fencing along the line of root pruning.
Root cutting or tearing may become a serious cause of tree decline. It can lead to loss of structural support, disruption of water and element uptake, and infection by disease causing organisms. • Avoid cutting large (one-inch or greater in diameter) roots. • Sharp tools should be used where cutting of large roots is deemed necessary. • Backfill immediately with soil over recently cut roots. • Torn roots should be properly re-cut, and backfilled.
WASHING OFF FOLIAGE & IRRIGATING
• coast redwood tree shall be washed off daily during grading, and weekly up until the landscaping phase • supplemental irrigation shall be provided for coast redwood tree as needed due to drought, as determined after the rainy season
• avoid irrigating coast live oak trees as they will not tolerate saturated soil
ROOT CROWN CLEARANCE
Ivy and soil shall be removed from trees to ensure that they are not decayed, and to create positive drainage away from trunks as is needed to prevent root crown rot disease.
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 7 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
PRUNING
Crown Cleaning for Safety
Trees shall be pruned to reduce likelihood of failure(safety) by removing dead, dying, weak and other likely to fail branches two inches in diameter and larger. Branches should be removed using thinning cuts or professional reduction cuts back to branches at least 33% of the size of the branch removed. Prior to implementing crown cleaning for safety, consulting arborist shall inspect & verify branches to be pruned.
Clearance - Directional Pruning
Trees that have branches extending into the site may interfere with construction. Thinning or heading cuts are recommended, with heading cuts made back to lateral branches that are not growing in the direction of the clearance zone. If more than 15% of foliage will be removed by directional pruning then pruning to provide structural balance to the tree may be required. Prior to implementing clearance pruning consulting arborist shall inspect & verify branches to be pruned.
Limitations
• No trees shall be climbed using climbing spurs
• All cuts shall be made in accordance with the ANSI A300 pruning standard section 7. • No heading or shearing cuts shall be made without authorization or as recommended above. • No more than one-third of the foliage shall be removed from an individual tree without authorization. • Work practices shall be consistent with the current ANSI A300 Part 1 pruning standard section 8 and the ANSI Z133 Standard
MULCHING
All bare soil surfaces within tree protection zones shall have 3 inches of wood chip mulch installed prior to fencing.
Sudden Oak Death (SOD) Treatments
All coast live oak trees are vulnerable to SOD, and shall be treated in November-December with three to six pounds of granulated gypsum on the soil surface (raked in) surrounding each trunk, and Agri-Phos (or Reliant) + PentraBark sprayed onto trunks, consistent with legal use of these products.
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 8 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX A - TREE DATA
#
Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite?
1 191 60.8 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair Multi trunked low, lower shaded windward dieback ON 2 142 45.2 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair poor poor Suppressed, low multiple trunks ON 3 85,23 34.4 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair Suppressed ON
4 72,22,25
, 96 68.5 blue gum eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair poor poor Stump sprout ON
5 72 22.9 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair Edge of slope ON
6 159 50.6
blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair poor poor
Root crown buried, trunk &
scaffolds leaning, Codominant
trunks with included bark,
flowering
ON
7 183 58.3
blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus
fair fair fair
Within fall zone of backyard,
raised & thinned, scaffold
cavity , root crown at
retaining wall, edge of slope &
vditch
OFF
8 144 45.9
blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus poor fair poor
Mushrooms & root crown
decay, edge of slope over road,
unbalanced, elevated risk
ON
9 31,24,34 28.3
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon good poor fair
Multi trunk included bark,
trunk failure-prone, steep
slope
OFF
10 288 91.7
blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus good fair fair
Multi trunk at 12’,
Codominant, balanced,
towering
ON
11 166 52.9
blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair
Root crown at edge of
retaining wall & vditch,
Codominant, minimal trunk
taper
OFF
12 20,24,32
,30 33.8 blue gum eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair poor poor Edge of slope below backyard OFF #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 9 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
13 177 52.9
blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair
Root crown at edge of
retaining wall & vditch, edge
of row, exposed, towering
ON
14 43,5 15.3
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia good fair good Near backyard fence. Root crown buried. OFF 15 54 17.2
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon fair good good On slope below backyard OFF
16 72 22.9
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon good poor fair
On slope below backyard,
trunk leaning, Codominant
trunks, top heavy
OFF
17 53 16.9
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon fair poor fair
Slope below backyard, eroding
root crown, minimal trunk
taper, top heavy, thin
OFF
18 70 22.3
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon good fair fair
Slope below backyard,
minimal trunk taper, top
heavy
OFF
19 37,35 22.9
Lombardy
poplar
Populus
nigra
`Italica’
poor fair fair
Codominant trunks with
included bark, stunted ON
20 48 15.3
silver dollar
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
cinerea fair fair fair
Next to backyard fence above
steep slope, minimal trunk
taper
OFF
21 18,30,24 22.9 yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra fair poor fair Next to backyard fence, on steep slope, root crown buried OFF 22 15,38,18
,24,41 43.3
silver dollar
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
cinerea
fair poor fair
Next to backyard fence above
steep slope, multiple trunks at
2.5 feet, minimal trunk
taper , one incipient cavity ,
included bark between trunks,
stump sprout maybe
OFF
23 42,42 26.8 yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra poor poor poor
Root crown buried OFF
24 48,60 34.4
yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra fair poor fair
Root crown buried,
Codominant trunks covered
with ivy
OFF
25 81 25.8 Monterey
cypress
Cupressus
macrocarpa poor fair fair Top of steep slope near backyard wall. Top dieback OFF Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite? #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 10 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
26 108 34.4
Monterey
cypress
Cupressus
macrocarpa fair fair fair
Midslope below backyard
fence, root crown buried, ivy
up trunk . Trunk leaning
OFF
27 54 17.2 yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra fair fair fair Next to vditch. Ivy up trunk OFF 28 27,32 18.8
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon fair poor fair
Edge of slope near backyard
fence. Codominant trunks
with included bark
OFF
29 41 13.1
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia good fair fair
On slope above vditch, root
crown buried, trunk leaning &
twisted
ON
30 41 13.1
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon fair poor poor
Mid slope below backyard
fence, root crown buried, few
branches on fence side,
unbalanced, stunted
OFF
31 107,15,9 41.7 yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra fair poor fair Near vditch. Multi trunk. ON
32 71 22.6
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon fair poor poor Near backyard fence. Unbalanced. OFF 33 38 12.1
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia fair poor poor
Below backyard fence.
Suppressed by palm.?minimal
trunk taper, trunk leaning
OFF
34 44 14.0
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia poor fair poor
Next to backyard
fence.suppressed, unbalanced,
ivy up trunk
OFF
35 40 12.7
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia fair fair fair On slope below fence. Root crown buried, ivy OFF 36 43 13.7 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor Dying back, trunk wound ON
37 79,46,42 53.2 Ca buckeye Aesculus
californica poor poor poor Hacked & poisoned, intertwining with plum ON 38 39 12.4 plum Prunus spp. fair poor poor Intertwining with buckeye ON Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite? #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 11 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
39 35,28,18
,
29,13,18
,
23,15,23
,
25,17,24
85.4 Ca buckeye Aesculus
californica
good fair good
Ivy at root crown
ON
40 72 22.9
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia
good fair fair
Ivy up trunk, rooting zone
limited by vditch slope &
fence. Crown unbalanced by
one sided pruning, large cuts
on one side.
OFF
41 32,22,32
,28,20 42.7 Ca buckeye Aesculus californica fair fair fair Ivy up trunk , growing through fence ON 42 24,144,1
8,18,18,
9,24
81.2 Ca buckeye Aesculus
californica poor poor fair
Ivy engulfed, suppressed
ON
43 44 14.0 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor Ivy engulfed, suppressed, growing into fence ON 44 11,9,30,
16 21.0 Ca buckeye Aesculus californica fair poor poor engulfed with ivy, near vditch, growing through fence ON 45 44 14.0 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor fair fair Stunted ON
46 21,27 15.3
blackwood
acacia
Acacia
melanoxylon poor poor poor Engulfed by ivy. Stunted . Stump sprout ON 47 34,30,30 29.9
yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra fair poor fair
Next to vditch. One fallen
dead trunk. Engulfed in ivy &
blackberry
ON
48 42,30,24 30.6
yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra
fair poor fair
Next to vditch. Codominant
trunks with included bark.
Engulfed in ivy , trunk
leaning towards backyard
fence
ON
49 99 31.5
yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra fair fair fair
On bank next to vditch.
Branches to ground. Leaning
and one sided
ON
50 57,44 32.2 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor fair fair Codominant trunks with included bark. Stunted ON Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite? #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 12 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
51 78 24.8
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia fair fair fair Leaning trunk. Codominant trunks with included bark. ON 52 31,31,31 29.6 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor Suppressed. Ivy up trunks ON
53 32,27,22 25.8 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor Engulfed in ivy ON
54 21,37 18.5
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia fair poor fair Engulfed in ivy. Trunks leaning. Branches to ground ON 55 17,26,33 24.2 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor Engulfed in ivy, ON
56 39 12.4
coast live
oak
Quercus
agrifolia fair fair fair
Next to trail.Root crown
buried.Ivy up root crown.
Trunk leaning. Codominant
trunks with included bark.
ON
57 28,25,25 23.9 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor
Stunted. ON
58 27,12,12
,9 18.2 yellow willow
Salix
lasiandra poor very poor poor Multi trunk, many fallen. Next to water ON 59 119 37.9
yellow
willow
Salix
lasiandra very
poor
fair poor
Engulfed in ivy. Codominant
trunks. Stunted. Defoliated,
may be dead
ON
60 48 15.3 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii
very
poor poor very poor
Ivy. Stunted ON
61 28,27 17.5
Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor fair poor
Codominant trunks with
included bark. Trunk wound.
Stunted
ON
62 180,112,
80 118.5 blue gum eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair poor fair Stump sprout. One dead buttress. ON 63 72 22.9 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus poor poor poor Suppressed ON
64 43 13.7 Ca buckeye Aesculus
californica poor fair fair Large trunk wound. Suppressed ON 65 43 13.7 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair In grove ON
Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite? #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 13 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
66 188.4 60.0
coast
redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens fair fair fair On bank above flowing water. ON 67 32,28 19.1 honey
locust
Gleditsia
triacanthos fair poor fair Next to dead and smaller locust ON 68 98 31.2 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair poor fair Minimal taper, large elbow, thin ON 69 90 28.7 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair Codominant tree. Codominant scaffolds. ON 70 100 31.8 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair Codominant tree ON
71 173 55.1 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair Solo tree, dominant. In between structure. ON 72 100 31.8 blue gum
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
globulus fair fair fair Codominant tree ON
73 45 14.3 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor Suppressed. Minimal trunk taper ON 75 57,50 34.1
ironwood
eucalyptus
Eucalyptus
sideroxylon fair poor poor
Suppressed. Grove tree.
Codominant trunks with
included bark.Large trunk
wound. Low branches.
ON
76 55 17.5
river she
oak
Casuarina
cunninghami
ana
poor poor poor
Stunted. Minimal trunk taper.
Trunk curve. Surrounded &
suppressed by jubata grass
ON
77 39 12.4 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii poor poor poor Stunted, minimal trunk taper ON
78 45 14.3 leyland
cypress
Cupressus
leylandii poor poor poor
Dieback. Stunted. No trunk
taper. Cypress canker disease. ON
79 87 27.7
coast
redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens
very
poor
fair poor Dying back from drought ON
80 58 18.5
honey
locust
Gleditsia
triacanthos very
poor very poor very poor
Dying, Codominant trunks
with included bark , mostly
dead one trunk
ON
81 66.5 21.2 honey
locust
Gleditsia
triacanthos
very
poor very poor very poor
Dying, minimal taper ON
Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite? #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 14 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
82 42 13.4 honey
locust
Gleditsia
triacanthos poor poor poor Stunted. No trunk taper. Minimal tree; row of three ON 83 20,52 22.9
honey
locust
Gleditsia
triacanthos poor poor poor
Stunted. Codominant scaffold
with included bark. Minimal
tree. Trunk wound.
ON
84 70,26 30.6
Ca pepper
tree
Schinus
molle poor poor fair
Large trunk cavities. Heavy
psyllid infestation. Near
structure
ON
85 61 19.4
olive Olea
europaea good fair fair Root sprouts. Trunk cavities. ON 86 48 15.3
olive Olea
europaea poor poor poor Stunted. Large trunk cavities. ON 87 54 17.2
olive Olea
europaea poor fair poor Root sprouts. Stunted. Trunk leaning ON 88 70 22.3
olive Olea
europaea poor fair fair Stunted ON
89 73,90 51.9
Babylonian
willow
Salix
babylonica fair poor fair
Codominant trunks with
included bark Branches to
ground.
ON
90 114 36.3
Ca pepper
tree
Schinus
molle fair fair good
Growing into structure.
Asphalt & seat wall around.
Trunk galling. Psyllid
infestation.
ON
91 67 21.3 Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii
very
poor very poor fair Dying. Mostly dead and decaying. Stunted. ON 92 120 38.2
Ca black
walnut
Juglans
hindsii very
poor poor fair
Dying. One trunk missing.
Cavities throughout. Trunk
leaning. Mistletoe.
ON
93 17,18,16
,
9,12,18,
18,9,9,6,
6,7,8
48.7 ash Fraxinus
spp.
good very poor poor
Stump sprout
ON
94 62 19.7 Italian
stone pine
Pinus pinea fair fair fair Trunk leaning & corrected.
Branches on ground. ON
95 60, 75 43.0 Babylonian
willow
Salix
babylonica fair poor fair Engulfed in ivy. Codominant trunks. ON Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite? #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 15 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
96 62,73,67 64.3
Ca pepper
tree
Schinus
molle fair poorexcel
-lent
Psyllid infestation. Fallen
trunk. Cavities. Ganoderma
decay fruiting body (heart
rot)
ON
Circumference
@4’6”
(inches)
Calculated
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Genus
species
Heal
th Structure Form Observations On or Offsite? #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 16 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX B
Name Genus species # of specimens
ash Fraxinus spp. 1
Babylonian willow Salix babylonica 2
blackwood acacia Acacia melanoxylon 9
blue gum eucalyptus Eucalyptus globulus 20
Ca black walnut Juglans hindsii 14
Ca buckeye Aesculus californica 6
Ca pepper tree Schinus molle 3
coast live oak Quercus agrifolia 9
coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens 2
honey locust Gleditsia triacanthos 5
ironwood eucalyptus Eucalyptus sideroxylon 1
Italian stone pine Pinus pinea 1
leyland cypress Cupressus leylandii 1
Lombardy poplar Populus nigra `Italica’ 1
Monterey cypress Cupressus macrocarpa 2
olive Olea europaea 4
plum Prunus spp. 1
river she oak Casuarina cunninghamiana 1
silver dollar eucalyptus Eucalyptus cinerea 2
yellow willow Salix lasiandra 10
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 17 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX C - ATTRIBUTES, HAZARDS
#
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale Fire Hazard Failure
1 60.8
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris, low
branches, species
probable
branch
2 45.2
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris, low
branches, species
probable
branch,
possible
trunk
3 34.4
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris, low
branches, species
probable
branch
4 68.5
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris, low
branches, species
probable
branch,
possible
trunk
5 22.9
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris, low
branches, species
probable
branch
6 50.6
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris, low
branches, species
probable
branch
7 58.3
blue gum
eucalyptus fair NO
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators,
cavity nesting
limited
rooting
zone
bark debris,
species
probable
branch
8 45.9 blue gum
eucalyptus poor YES Wind screen, perch on slope bark debris, low branches, species entire tree
probable
9 28.3 blackwood
acacia good NO Erosion control on slope minimal trunk possible #
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 18 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
10 91.7
blue gum
eucalyptus good YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris,
species
branch
probable,
trunk
possible
11 52.9
blue gum
eucalyptus fair NO
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris,
species
branch
probable,
trunk
possible
12 33.8 blue gum
eucalyptus fair NO Erosion control on slope bark debris, species branch
probable
13 52.9
blue gum
eucalyptus fair NO
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
toe of
slope
bark debris,
species
branch
probable
14 15.3
coast live
oak good NO
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity
top of
slope low roots possible
15 17.2 blackwood
acacia fair NO Erosion control on steep slope minimal improbable 16 22.9 blackwood
acacia good NO Erosion control on steep slope minimal trunk possible 17 16.9 blackwood
acacia fair NO Erosion control on steep slope minimal trunk possible 18 22.3 blackwood
acacia good NO Erosion control on steep slope minimal trunk possible 19 22.9 Lombardy
poplar poor YES Wind break on flat ground minimal dead branch 20 15.3
silver dollar
eucalyptus fair NO
Wind break,
erosion
control, visual
screen
top of
slope
backyar
d fence
branches near
structure
branch
possible
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 19 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
21 22.9
yellow
willow fair NO
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
steep
slope
fire ladder from
low branches
branch
probable,
trunk
possible
22 43.3
silver dollar
eucalyptus fair NO
Wind break,
erosion
control, visual
screen
top of
slope
fire ladder from
low branches
trunk
possible
23 26.8
yellow
willow
poor NO
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat on slope fire ladder from low branches branch
probable,
trunk
possible
24 34.4
yellow
willow fair NO
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
top of
slope
fire ladder from
low branches
branch
probable,
trunk
possible
25 25.8
Monterey
cypress poor NO
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity, perch
top of
slope,
flat
dead branches,
species
dead branch
probable
26 34.4
Monterey
cypress fair NO
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity, perch
slope dead branches,
species
dead branch
probable
27 17.2
yellow
willow fair NO
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
toe of
slope
fire ladder from
low branches &
deadwood
branch
probable,
trunk
possible
28 18.8
blackwood
acacia fair NO
Erosion control top of
slope
backyar
d fence
minimal trunk
possible
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 20 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
29 13.1
coast live
oak good NO
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
toe of
slope
fire ladder from
low branches
roots
possible
30 13.1
blackwood
acacia fair NO
Erosion control
slope minimal
branch &
roots
possible
31 41.7
yellow
willow fair NO
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
toe of
slope
fire ladder from
low branches &
trunks
trunk
possible
32 22.6 blackwood
acacia fair NO Erosion control top of slope minimal branch possible 33 12.1
coast live
oak fair NO
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity
top of
slope
from intertwined
palm improbable
34 14.0
coast live
oak
poor NO
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity
top of
slope minimal branch possible
35 12.7
coast live
oak fair NO
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity
slope minimal branch
possible
36 13.7 Ca black
walnut poor YES cavity nesting, perching flat minimal improbable 37 53.2 Ca buckeye poor YES Perching,
visual interest flat minimal improbable
38 12.4 plum fair YES pollen, nectar,
fruit flat minimal improbable
39 85.4 Ca buckeye good YES Perching,
visual interest flat minimal improbable
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 21 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
40 22.9
coast live
oak good YES
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity
toe of
slope minimal possible branch
41 42.7 Ca buckeye fair YES Perching,
screening flat minimal improbable
42 81.2 Ca buckeye poor YES Perching,
visual interest flat minimal improbable
43 14.0 Ca black
walnut poor YES cavity nesting, perching flat minimal improbable 44 21.0 Ca buckeye fair YES Perching flat minimal improbable 45 14.0 Ca black
walnut poor YES cavity nesting, perching flat minimal improbable 46 15.3 blackwood
acacia poor YES flat minimal trunk possible
47 29.9
yellow
willow fair YES
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
flat dead trunk & low
branches
trunk
possible
48 30.6
yellow
willow fair YES
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
flat low branches trunk
possible
49 31.5
yellow
willow fair YES
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
toe of
slope low branches
branches &
trunk
possible
50 32.2 Ca black
walnut poor YES cavity nesting, perching flat minimal trunks possible 51 24.8
coast live
oak fair YES
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity
hummoc
ky minimal trunks possible
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 22 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
52 29.6
Ca black
walnut poor YES
Screening trail,
cavity nesting,
perching
hummoc
ky minimal improbable
53 25.8
Ca black
walnut poor YES
Screening trail,
cavity nesting,
perching
hummoc
ky minimal improbable
54 18.5 coast live
oak fair YES Screening trail hummocky minimal improbable 55 24.2
Ca black
walnut poor YES
Screening trail,
cavity nesting,
perching
hummoc
ky minimal improbable
56 12.4 coast live
oak fair YES Screening trail hummocky minimal possible trunk 57 23.9 Ca black
walnut poor YES perching flat minimal improbable
58 18.2
yellow
willow poor YES
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
low
spot,
water
dead trunks trunk
probable
59 37.9
yellow
willow very
poor
YES
Erosion
control,
wildlife habitat
above
water
deadwood trunk
possible
60 15.3 Ca black
walnut
very
poor
YES perching flat minimal improbable
61 17.5 Ca black
walnut poor YES perching flat minimal improbable
62 118.5
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators flat bark debris, species
branch
probable,
trunk
possible
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 23 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
63 22.9
blue gum
eucalyptus poor YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
flat bark debris,
species
branch
possible
64 13.7 Ca buckeye poor YES Perching gradual
slope minimal improbable
65 13.7
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
gradual
slope
bark debris,
species improbable
66 60.0
coast
redwood
fair YES
Erosion
control,
biological
diversity,
beautiful form
slope,
water
low branches branch
probable
67 19.1 honey
locust fair NO perch flat adjoining dead trees improbable 68 31.2
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
gradual
slope,
below
road
bark debris,
species
branch
probable
69 28.7
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
gradual
slope,
below
road
bark debris,
species
branch
probable
70 31.8
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
gradual
slope,
below
road
bark debris,
species
branch
probable
71 55.1
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
gradual
slope,
below
road
bark debris,
species
branch
probable
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 24 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
72 31.8
blue gum
eucalyptus fair YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
flat,
structur
es
bark debris,
species
branch
probable
73 14.3
Ca black
walnut
poor YES
wind screen,
perch,
pollinators
gradual
slope,
below
road
minimal improbable
75 34.1
ironwood
eucalyptus fair YES
perch gradual
slope,
below
road
low branches branch
possible
76 17.5
river she
oak
poor YES
windbreak gradual
slope,
below
road
minimal branch
probable
77 12.4
Ca black
walnut poor YES
perching gradual,
above
house
minimal improbable
78 14.3
leyland
cypress poor YES
perch gradual
slope,
below
road
entire tree branch
probable
79 27.7
coast
redwood very
poor
YES
perch gradual
slope,
near
barn
entire tree
branch &
trunk
probable
80 18.5
honey
locust very
poor
YES
perch gradual
slope,
below
road
entire tree branch
probable
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 25 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
81 21.2
honey
locust very
poor
YES
perch gradual
slope,
below
road
entire tree branch
probable
82 13.4
honey
locust
poor YES
perch gradual
slope,
below
road
entire tree branch
probable
83 22.9
honey
locust
poor YES
perch gradual
slope,
below
road
entire tree branch
probable
84 30.6
Ca pepper
tree
poor YES
Perching,
cavity nesting,
visual interest
gradual
slope,
below
house
low branches branch
possible
85 19.4
olive
good YES
perch gradual
slope,ab
ove
barn
minimal improbable
86 15.3
olive
poor YES
perch gradual
slope,ab
ove
barn
minimal improbable
87 17.2
olive
poor YES
perch gradual
slope,ab
ove
barn
minimal improbable
88 22.3
olive
poor YES
perch gradual
slope,ab
ove
barn
minimal improbable
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 26 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
89 51.9
Babylonian
willow fair YES
Windscreen,
shade
gradual
slope,in
arbor
low branches branch
probable
90 36.3
Ca pepper
tree fair YES
Perching,
cavity nesting,
visual interest
slope
next to
structur
e
low branches branch
possible
91 21.3 Ca black
walnut
very
poor
YES cavity nesting,
perching
gradual
slope deadwood entire tree probable
92 38.2 Ca black
walnut
very
poor
YES cavity nesting,
perching
gradual
slope deadwood entire tree probable
93 48.7
ash
good YES
Shade,
windscreen,
view
flat minimal improbable
94 19.7
Italian stone
pine fair YES
perch,
biological
diversity
gradual
slope low branches branch possible
95 43.0 Babylonian
willow fair YES Windscreen, shade walls low branches branch probable 96 64.3
Ca pepper
tree fair YES
Perching,
cavity nesting,
visual interest
gradual
slope low branches branch probable
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health On
Site? Attributes site locale # Fire Hazard Failure
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 27 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX D - IMPACTS ON TREES FROM PROPOSED GRADING
#
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health Near
Proposed Grading Proximity Likely Impacts Likely Consequences 1 60.8 blue gum
eucalyptus fair road repairs within dripline root loss, trunk & branch damage increased likelihood of
branch & root failure
2 45.2 blue gum
eucalyptus fair road repairs entire tree loss loss
3 34.4 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 1, road entire tree loss loss
4 68.5 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 1 pad within dripline root loss reduced health 5 22.9 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 1 pad within dripline root loss reduced health 6 50.6 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 2 pad within dripline root loss reduced health 7 58.3 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 2 outside of rooting zone no direct impacts increased likelihood of branch failure 8 45.9 blue gum
eucalyptus poor lot 3 outside of dripline no direct impacts increased likelihood of whole tree failure 9 28.3
blackwood
acacia good lots 3-4 outside of dripline & 1.5x fall zone no direct impacts no measurable consequences 10 91.7 blue gum
eucalyptus good lots 3-4 outside of dripline no direct impacts no measurable consequences 11 52.9 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 4 outside of rooting zone, within fall zone no direct impacts increased likelihood of branch failure 12 33.8 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 4 outside of dripline no direct impacts no measurable consequences 13 52.9 blue gum
eucalyptus fair lot 4 edge of dripline in pad minimal root loss no measurable consequences 14 15.3 coast live oak good lot 4 beyond fall zone X 1.5 no impacts no consequences 15 17.2
blackwood
acacia fair road repairs within fall zone of access road reduced balance
(wind patterns)
increased likelihood of
uprooting
16 22.9
blackwood
acacia good road repairs within fall zone of access road reduced balance
(wind patterns)
increased likelihood of
uprooting
17 16.9
blackwood
acacia fair road repairs within fall zone of access road reduced balance
(wind patterns)
increased likelihood of
uprooting
#
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 28 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
18 22.3
blackwood
acacia good road repairs within fall zone of access road reduced balance
(wind patterns)
increased likelihood of
uprooting
19 22.9 Lombardy
poplar poor pad 6, road
repairs within graded pad loss loss
20 15.3
silver dollar
eucalyptus fair pad 7 pad within fall zone reduced balance (wind patterns) increased likelihood of
branch & trunk failure
21 22.9 yellow willow fair pad 7 pad within fall zone reduced balance (wind patterns)
increased likelihood of
branch, trunk & root
failure
22 43.3 silver dollar
eucalyptus fair pad 7 pad within fall zone reduced balance (wind patterns) increased likelihood of
branch, trunk & root
failure
23 26.8 yellow willow poor pad 8 pad within fall zone root loss, reduced balance
increased likelihood of
branch, trunk & root
failure
24 34.4 yellow willow fair pad 8 pad within fall zone root loss, reduced balance
increased likelihood of
branch, trunk & root
failure
25 25.8 Monterey
cypress poor pad & unit
9 pad & unit within fall
zone
root loss, reduced
balance
increased likelihood of
branch, trunk & root
failure
26 34.4 Monterey
cypress
fair pad & unit
9 pad within graded zone,
unit within fall zone loss loss
27 17.2 yellow willow fair pad & unit
9 within graded zone loss loss
28 18.8 blackwood
acacia fair pad & unit
10 dripline within graded
zone
root loss, reduced
balance
increased likelihood of
root, trunk & branch
failure
29 13.1 coast live oak good pad & unit
10 graded zone loss loss
30 13.1 blackwood
acacia fair pads &
units 10-11 within fall zone of pad reduced balance
(wind patterns)
increased likelihood of
root, trunk & branch
failure
31 41.7 yellow willow fair pads &
units 10-11 within graded zone loss loss
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health Near
Proposed
# Grading Proximity Likely Impacts Likely Consequences
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 29 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
32 22.6
blackwood
acacia fair parcel B bioretention above bio-retention reduced balance (pattern changes) increased likelihood of
branch & root failure
33 12.1 coast live oak fair parcel B bioretention above bio-retention reduced balance (pattern changes)
increased likelihood of
branch & root failure
34 14.0 coast live oak poor parcel B bioretention above bio-retention reduced balance (pattern changes) decline
35 12.7 coast live oak fair parcel B bioretention above bio-retention reduced balance (pattern changes) decline
36 13.7 Ca black
walnut poor emergency
access road
within loss loss
37 53.2 Ca buckeye poor emergency
access road
within loss loss
38 12.4 plum fair emergency
access road
within loss loss
39 85.4 Ca buckeye good emergency
access road within loss loss
40 22.9 coast live oak good emergency
access road next to root loss increased likelihood of
failure
41 42.7 Ca buckeye fair emergency
access road next to root loss, trunk &
branch damage loss
42 81.2 Ca buckeye poor emergency
access road next to root loss, trunk &
branch damage loss
43 14.0 Ca black
walnut poor emergency
access road within loss loss
44 21.0 Ca buckeye fair pad 12 within loss loss
45 14.0 Ca black
walnut poor pad 12 within loss loss
46 15.3 blackwood
acacia poor pad 12 within loss loss
47 29.9 yellow willow fair pad 13 within loss loss
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health Near
Proposed
# Grading Proximity Likely Impacts Likely Consequences
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 30 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
48 30.6 yellow willow fair pad 14 within loss loss
49 31.5 yellow willow fair pad 15 within loss loss
50 32.2 Ca black
walnut poor pad 15 or
road within loss loss
51 24.8 coast live oak fair road within loss loss
52 29.6 Ca black
walnut poor road within loss loss
53 25.8 Ca black
walnut poor road within loss loss
54 18.5 coast live oak fair pad 17 within loss loss
55 24.2 Ca black
walnut poor pad 16 within loss loss
56 12.4 coast live oak fair pad 16 within loss loss
57 23.9 Ca black
walnut poor pad 20-21 within loss loss
58 18.2 yellow willow poor pad 20 within loss loss
59 37.9 yellow willow very poor pad 21 within loss loss 60 15.3 Ca black
walnut very poor pad 21 within loss loss
61 17.5 Ca black
walnut poor pad 21 within loss loss
62 118.5 blue gum
eucalyptus fair pad 22 within loss loss
63 22.9 blue gum
eucalyptus poor pad 22-23 within loss loss
64 13.7 Ca buckeye poor pad 23 within loss loss
65 13.7 blue gum
eucalyptus fair pad 24 within loss loss
66 60.0 coast redwood fair pad 28-29 trunk near grading, dripline within pad,
root loss, heat
stress, branch
removal
increased likelihood of
failure
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health Near
Proposed
# Grading Proximity Likely Impacts Likely Consequences
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 31 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
67 19.1 honey locust fair parcel D next to loss loss
68 31.2
blue gum
eucalyptus fair pad & unit
29 within loss loss
69 28.7
blue gum
eucalyptus fair pad & unit
29 within loss loss
70 31.8
blue gum
eucalyptus fair pad & unit
29 within loss loss
71 55.1
blue gum
eucalyptus fair pad & unit
29 or road within loss loss
72 31.8
blue gum
eucalyptus fair pad & unit
28 or road within loss loss
73 14.3
Ca black
walnut poor pad & unit
29 or road within loss loss
75 34.1
ironwood
eucalyptus fair pad & unit
29 or road within loss loss
76 17.5 river she oak poor pad & unit
29 or road within loss loss
77 12.4 Ca black
walnut poor pad & unit
30 within loss loss
78 14.3 leyland
cypress poor pad & unit
30 within loss loss
79 27.7 coast redwood very poor pad & unit
6 within loss loss
80 18.5 honey locust very poor pad & unit
6 or road within loss loss
81 21.2 honey locust very poor pad & unit
6 or road within loss loss
82 13.4 honey locust poor pad & unit
6 or road within loss loss
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health Near
Proposed
# Grading Proximity Likely Impacts Likely Consequences
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 32 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
83 22.9 honey locust poor pad & unit
6 or road within loss loss
84 30.6 Ca pepper
tree poor pad & unit
40 within loss loss
85 19.4 olive good pad & unit
40 within loss loss
86 15.3 olive poor pad & unit
40 within loss loss
87 17.2 olive poor pad & unit
40 within loss loss
88 22.3 olive poor pad & unit
40 within loss loss
89 51.9 Babylonian
willow fair pad & unit
38 within loss loss
90 36.3 Ca pepper
tree
fair pad & unit
33 within loss loss
91 21.3 Ca black
walnut very poor pad & unit
33 within loss loss
92 38.2 Ca black
walnut very poor pad & unit
33 within loss loss
93 48.7 ash good pad & unit
37 within loss loss
94 19.7
Italian stone
pine fair pad & unit
35 within loss loss
95 43.0 Babylonian
willow fair pad & unit
33 within loss loss
96 64.3 Ca pepper
tree
fair pad & unit
33 within loss loss
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name Health Near
Proposed
# Grading Proximity Likely Impacts Likely Consequences
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 33 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX E - RECOMMENDATIONS
#
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE RATIONALE
1 60.8 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 2 45.2 blue gum
eucalyptus POOR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 3 34.4 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 4 68.5 blue gum
eucalyptus POOR-FAIR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 5 22.9 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 6 50.6 blue gum
eucalyptus POOR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 7 58.3 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 8 45.9 blue gum
eucalyptus POOR REMOVE risk, fire hazard, high maintenance 9 28.3 blackwood acacia FAIR PRESERVE indirect not large impacts 10 91.7 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE elevated risk
#
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 34 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
11 52.9 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE fall zone of access road, interlocking grove 12 33.8 blue gum
eucalyptus POOR REMOVE elevated risk
13 52.9 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE elevated risk
14 15.3 coast live oak FAIR-GOOD PRESERVE far from construction 15 17.2 blackwood acacia FAIR-GOOD PRESERVE contributing to erosion control on steep slope
16 22.9 blackwood acacia FAIR PRESERVE contributing to erosion control on steep slope
17 16.9 blackwood acacia POOR-FAIR PRESERVE contributing to erosion control on steep slope
18 22.3 blackwood acacia FAIR PRESERVE contributing to erosion control on steep slope
19 22.9 Lombardy poplar POOR-FAIR REMOVE within graded area, poor health
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 35 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
20 15.3 silver dollar
eucalyptus FAIR PRESERVE rooting zone outside of area to be graded 21 22.9 yellow willow POOR-FAIR PRESERVE
malleable species, can be
pruned to reduce
likelihood of failure
22 43.3 silver dollar
eucalyptus POOR-FAIR PRESERVE rooting zone outside of area to be graded 23 26.8 yellow willow POOR PRESERVE
malleable species, can be
pruned to reduce
likelihood of failure
24 34.4 yellow willow POOR-FAIR PRESERVE
malleable species, can be
pruned to reduce
likelihood of failure
25 25.8 Monterey cypress POOR-FAIR REMOVE elevated risk 26 34.4 Monterey cypress FAIR REMOVE grading
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 36 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
27 17.2 yellow willow FAIR REMOVE grading
28 18.8 blackwood acacia POOR-FAIR PRESERVE visual screening, soil erosion control
29 13.1 coast live oak FAIR REMOVE grading
30 13.1 blackwood acacia POOR PRESERVE screening, soil erosion control
31 41.7 yellow willow POOR-FAIR REMOVE within graded area, health
32 22.6 blackwood acacia POOR PRESERVE screening, soil erosion control
33 12.1 coast live oak POOR REMOVE intertwined with palm that will be removed
34 14.0 coast live oak POOR PRESERVE erosion control,
biological diversity
35 12.7 coast live oak FAIR PRESERVE erosion control,
biological diversity
36 13.7 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE emergency access road 37 53.2 Ca buckeye POOR REMOVE emergency access road
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 37 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
38 12.4 plum POOR REMOVE emergency access road
39 85.4 Ca buckeye GOOD REMOVE emergency access road
40 22.9 coast live oak FAIR PRESERVE screening, biological diversity
41 42.7 Ca buckeye FAIR REMOVE screening, soil erosion control, biological diversity
42 81.2 Ca buckeye POOR REMOVE
screening, soil erosion
control, biological
diversity
43 14.0 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE grading
44 21.0 Ca buckeye POOR REMOVE grading
45 14.0 Ca black walnut POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
46 15.3 blackwood acacia POOR REMOVE grading
47 29.9 yellow willow POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
48 30.6 yellow willow POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
49 31.5 yellow willow FAIR REMOVE grading
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 38 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
50 32.2 Ca black walnut POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
51 24.8 coast live oak FAIR REMOVE grading
52 29.6 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE grading
53 25.8 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE grading
54 18.5 coast live oak POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
55 24.2 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE grading
56 12.4 coast live oak FAIR REMOVE grading
57 23.9 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE grading
58 18.2 yellow willow POOR-VERY
POOR REMOVE grading, condition
59 37.9 yellow willow POOR REMOVE grading, condition
60 15.3 Ca black walnut VERY POORPOOR REMOVE grading, condition 61 17.5 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE grading, condition
62 118.5 blue gum
eucalyptus POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 39 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
63 22.9 blue gum
eucalyptus POOR REMOVE grading
64 13.7 Ca buckeye POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
65 13.7 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE grading
66 60.0 coast redwood FAIR PRESERVE
soil erosion control,
screening, biological
diversity, specimen
67 19.1 honey locust POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading, condition 68 31.2
blue gum
eucalyptus POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
69 28.7
blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE grading
70 31.8 blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE grading
71 55.1
blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR REMOVE grading
72 31.8
blue gum
eucalyptus FAIR-GOOD REMOVE grading
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 40 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
73 14.3 Ca black walnut FAIR REMOVE grading
75 34.1 ironwood
eucalyptus POOR REMOVE grading
76 17.5 river she oak POOR REMOVE grading
77 12.4 Ca black walnut POOR REMOVE grading
78 14.3 leyland cypress POOR REMOVE grading
79 27.7 coast redwood POOR REMOVE grading
80 18.5 honey locust VERY POOR REMOVE grading
81 21.2 honey locust VERY POOR REMOVE grading
82 13.4 honey locust POOR REMOVE grading
83 22.9 honey locust POOR REMOVE grading
84 30.6 Ca pepper tree POOR REMOVE grading
85 19.4 olive FAIR-GOOD REMOVE grading
86 15.3 olive POOR REMOVE grading
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 41 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
87 17.2 olive POOR REMOVE grading
88 22.3 olive POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
89 51.9 Babylonian
willow POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
90 36.3 Ca pepper tree FAIR-GOOD REMOVE grading
91 21.3 Ca black walnut VERY POORPOOR REMOVE grading
92 38.2 Ca black walnut POOR-VERY
POOR REMOVE grading
93 48.7 ash POOR REMOVE grading
94 19.7 Italian stone pine FAIR REMOVE grading
95 43.0 Babylonian
willow POOR-FAIR REMOVE grading
96 64.3 Ca pepper tree FAIR REMOVE grading
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name overall
Condition
REMOVE OR
PRESERVE # RATIONALE
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 42 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX F - PRESERVATION MEASURES
#
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name
overall
Conditio
n
TREE
PROTECTION
ZONE
RADIUS
from trunk
(feet)
ROOT
CROWN
EXCAVATION
/
INSPECTION
PRUNING IRRIGATION
SUDDEN OAK
DEATH
PREVENTION
9 28.3
blackwood
acacia FAIR 20
14 15.3
coast live
oak
FAIRGOOD 20 avoid excessive
water treat
15 22.9
blackwood
acacia
FAIRGOOD 15
16 16.9
blackwood
acacia FAIR 15
17 22.3
blackwood
acacia
POORFAIR 20
18 15.3
blackwood
acacia FAIR 15
20 15.3
silver
dollar
eucalyptus
FAIR 20
21 22.9 yellow
willow
POORFAIR 25 clear root crown
22 43.3
silver
dollar
eucalyptus
POORFAIR
25 23 26.8 yellow
willow POOR 30 clear root crown
24 34.4 yellow
willow
POORFAIR 25 clear root crown
28 18.8
blackwood
acacia
POORFAIR 15
30 22.6
blackwood
acacia POOR 20
32 14.0
blackwood
acacia POOR 15
34 12.7
coast live
oak POOR 20
#
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 43 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
35 22.9
coast live
oak FAIR 15 clear root crown avoid excessive water treat 40 60.0
coast live
oak FAIR 20 clear root crown avoid excessive water treat 66 60.0
coast
redwood FAIR 30 clear root crown Raise for fire safety
Trunk
Diameter
(inches)
Name
overall
Conditio
n
TREE
PROTECTION
ZONE
RADIUS
from trunk
(feet)
ROOT
CROWN
EXCAVATION
/
INSPECTION
PRUNING IRRIGATION
SUDDEN OAK
DEATH
PREVENTION
#
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 44 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX G - GLOSSARY
dripline - region underneath tree canopy
form - genetically determined appearance that includes spread, height & configuration health - tree growth as expressed by foliage, twigs, branches & trunks including resistance to pests root crown – region where trunk and root system meet, also called `buttress’ or `butt’ rooting zone – area where roots are likely to survive, beginning at the trunk and extending up to three times the radius of a tree’s dripline region
scaffold – large, structural branch
structure - physical and mechanical qualities of tree
trunk circumference – measurement of trunk, distance around trunk diameter - trunk circumference divided by 3.14
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 45 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX H - APPROXIMATE TREE LOCATIONS PRE-CONSTRUCTION Trees, Bugs, Dirt 46 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPROXIMATE TREE LOCATIONS ON PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 47 Landscape Consulting & Training
D.R. Horton Arborist Report March 31, 2022
3000 Executive Parkway, Suite 100 215 Skelly - Hercules CA San Ramon CA
APPENDIX I - CERTIFICATE OF PERFORMANCE
I, Michael Baefsky certify:
• That I have reviewed the The City of Hercules Municipal Code, Chapter 15 Mature Tree Removal • That I have evaluated the subject trees, and stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation is stated in the attached report;
• That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; • That the analysis, opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own; • That my analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted professional practices;
• That no one provided significant professional assistance to the consultant, except as indicated within the report;
• That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party.
I certify that I am Registered Consulting Arborist #456, a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists, and am Certified Arborist & Qualified Risk Assessor #WE0222A, Agricultural Pest Control Advisor #074617, Qualified Applicator #99864, Licensed Landscape Contractor (inactive) #931410, and have been involved in the practice of Arboriculture, Integrated Pest Management, Plant Health Care and Ecological Soils Management, and the study of soils and horticulture for over thirty years.
Trees, Bugs, Dirt 48 Landscape Consulting & Training
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
Cultural Resources Supporting Information
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
21180006 • 12/2021 | 21180006_record_search.mxd
Record Search Map
Source: USGS Mare Island 7.5' Quadrangle / T02N,R04W, sections: 21 and 22 / Landgrants: Pinole (Martinez) and Wetlands.
CITY OF HERCULES
SKELLY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
2,000 1,000 0 2,000
Feet
Project Area
Half-Mile Radius
Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
21183RS
P-07-000041 CA-CCO-000022 Resource Name - [none] S-002686, S007572, S-048307, S-053807
Site Prehistoric AP09; AP15 1957 (A.B. Elsasser, [none]) P-07-000139 CA-CCO-000260 Resource Name - Nelson No. 260 S-002686, S007572, S-048307, S-053807
Site Prehistoric AP09; AP15 1907 (N.C. Nelson);
2015 (N. Thompson, Tom Origer &
Associates; Anthrological Studies
Center, SSU)
P-07-000140 CA-CCO-000261 Resource Name - Nelson No. 261 S-002686, S048307, S-053807Site Prehistoric AP09; AP11; AP15 1907 (N. C. Nelson, University of California)
P-07-000443 CA-CCO-000370 Resource Name - Railroad Ave
and Talley Way;
Other - 'Old' Hercules;
Other - Masonic Hall
Object, Site Prehistoric AP15 1978 (Michele A. Muse, [none]) S-001128, S-022962 P-07-000813 CA-CCO-000733H Other - C-Antioch South-1, CAntioch North-1, C-Antioch North2; Resource Name - Southern
Pacific Railroad;
Other - Union Pacific Railroad;
Other - Central Pacific Railroad;
Voided - P-07-002568;
Other - San Pablo & Tulare
Railroad;
Other - SPN-3;
Other - Central, Southern, Union
Pacific RR;
Other - SPN-1;
Other - Old Southern Pacific
Railroad Route Segment;
Other - San Pablo & Tulare
Railroad;
Other - GANDA-509-01H;
Other - Abandoned Railroad
Spurs & Warehouse Complex;
Voided - P-07-000503;
Other - San Pablo- Tulare
Railroad Brentwood Segment;
Other - Map Ref #A-09
S-010268, S017993, S-018352,
S-022464, S022812, S-022929,
S-030387, S031375, S-031961,
S-033643, S034865, S-034866,
S-035244, S037839, S-037849,
S-040338, S040530, S-043313,
S-043685, S046773, S-046889,
S-047775, S051366, S-051501
Building,
Structure
Historic AH07; HP08; HP11;
HP19
1994 (Hatoff, Voss, Waetcher, Wee,
Bente, Woodward-Clyde
Consultants);
1995 (Brian Hatoff, Woodward
Clyde);
1995 (Hatoff, Voss, Waechter, Wee,
Bente, Woodward Clyde);
1999 (Barry Scott, Jones & Stokes
Associates);
1999 (S. Atchley, G. Roark, Jones &
Stokes Associates);
1999 (S. Atchley, G. Roark, Jones &
Stokes Associates);
2002 (Bryan Larson, Meta Bunse,
JRP Historical Consulting Services);
2004 (Josh Smallwood, CRM Tech);
2006 (Suzanne Baker,
Archaeological/Historical
Consultants);
2008 (Ian Alexander, Juan
Cervantes, Holman & Associates);
2009 (T. Martin, K. Frank, Garcia
and Associates);
2009 (Richard H. Norwood, Allen
Beck, Doug Tilto, HDR | DTA);
2011 (Scott Billat, EarthTouch, Inc.);
2011 (Tracy Bakic, Cindy Baker,
PAR Environmental Services);
2014 (Ric Windmiller, [none})