MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 14
PACIFIC REFINING WHARF, LAT_122_16_15 WEST, HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Owner Name: PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: Not Reported
Operator Type: Not Reported
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:
No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:
No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:
NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:
Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:
No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:
No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:
No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 15
PACIFIC REFINING WHARF, LAT_122_16_15 WEST, HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:
No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:
No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20021007
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:
No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Hazardous Waste Summary:
Waste Code: D001
Waste Description: IGNITABLE WASTE
Handler - Owner Operator:
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: PACIFIC REFINING COMPANY
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NINE GREENWAY PLAZA
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77046
Owner/Operator Telephone: 713-877-3929
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:
Receive Date: 19980422
Handler Name: PACIFIC REFINING WHARF
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: Not Reported
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:
No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 16
PACIFIC REFINING WHARF, LAT_122_16_15 WEST, HERCULES, CA 94547 (Continued) Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000155290
▲ 5
S <1/10 (499 ft. / 0.095 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
RCRA-SQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19861110
Handler Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Handler Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAD981658974
Contact Name: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
Contact Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE
Contact City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Contact Telephone: 415-724-3314
Contact Fax: Not Reported
Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Other
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 17
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: CA
State District: 2
Mailing Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE
Mailing City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Owner Name: JIM CHRISTENSEN
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Operator Type: Private
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:
No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:
No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:
NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:
Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:
No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:
No
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 18
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:
No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:
No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:
No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20020627
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:
No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Handler - Owner Operator:
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: JIM CHRISTENSEN
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 19
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:
Receive Date: 19861110
Handler Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: CA
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:
No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
NAICS Code: 811111
NAICS Description: GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
LUST: Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Lead Agency: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site
Geo Track: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0601300540 Global Id: T0601300540
Latitude: 38.007673
Longitude: -122.28832
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 07/09/2015
Case Worker: MYM
RB Case Number: 07-0587
Local Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
File Location: Not Reported
Local Case Number: 71366
Potential Media Affect: Aquifer used for drinking water supply, Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 20
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site History: The subject site (site) is located at 2500 San Pablo Avenue, Pinole, California in the partly industrial, and residential area of the city of Pinole, California. The site is the Former Square Deal Garage auto repair shop. The site is located between Valley Road and John Street.
Soil and groundwater contamination was discovered during underground storage tank (UST) removal at the site on February 11, 1992. Soil samples contained up to 1,700 parts per million (ppm) of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), 5 ppm of benzene and 21 ppm of xylenes. Groundwater samples contained up to 1,300 parts per billion (ppb) of TPHg, 1,400 ppb of benzene, and 510 ppb of ethylbenzenes.
LUST:
Global Id: T0601300540
Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker
Contact Name: SUE LOYD
Organization Name: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.
City: MARTINEZ
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: Not Reported
Global Id: T0601300540
Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker
Contact Name: MARTIN MUSONGE
Organization Name: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Address: 1515 CLAY STREET
City: OAKLAND
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: Not Reported
LUST:
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 06/27/2014
Action: File Review - Closure
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/31/2012
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/15/2013
Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report
Global Id: T0601300540
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 21
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 01/13/2009
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 05/17/2013
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: Other
Date: 08/27/1991
Action: Leak Reported
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/01/2015
Action: Well Destruction Workplan
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 10/31/2014
Action: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 01/28/2014
Action: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR) Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 07/14/2010
Action: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR) Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: Other
Date: 06/26/1991
Action: Leak Stopped
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 10/29/2012
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/05/2013
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 03/29/2013
Action: File Review - Closure
Global Id: T0601300540
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 22
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/19/2014
Action: Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 07/09/2015
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/18/2015
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: Other
Date: 06/26/1991
Action: Leak Discovery
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/30/2013
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/31/2012
Action: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan - Regulator Responded Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/23/2014
Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded
Global Id: T0601300540
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/27/2015
Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded
LUST:
Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 06/26/1991
Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 09/01/1994
Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Open - Eligible for Closure
Status Date: 10/31/2014
Global Id: T0601300540
Status: Completed - Case Closed
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 23
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Status Date: 07/09/2015
LUST REG 2:
Region: 2
Facility Id: 07-0587
Facility Status: Leak being confirmed
Case Number: 71366
How Discovered: Tank Closure
Leak Cause: UNK
Leak Source: UNK
Date Leak Confirmed: 9/1/1994
Oversight Program: LUST
Prelim. Site Assesment Wokplan
Submitted:
Not Reported
Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not Reported
Pollution Characterization Began: Not Reported
Pollution Remediation Plan
Submitted:
Not Reported
Date Remediation Action Underway: Not Reported
Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring
Began:
Not Reported
CERS HAZ WASTE: Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 70796
CERS ID: 10012105
CERS Description: Hazardous Waste Generator
FINDS: Other Ascertainable Records
Registry ID: 110002740721
Click Here: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110002740721 Environmental Interest/Information System:
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA.
STATE MASTER
The Click here to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. database contains http://www.edrnet.com/srf2/FinalSiteReport.aspx?ID=2a2aa11zah8O1x2gzw6dhg4jOJ2ExdAPgR8gwGAQdt2Vad1WaF7p1P2zzB3xh63HONAVx t3bgF29wP2daA2Fak181K7EzM9ohd1IO94sxG1RgL4cwv8Ldl0GgF3TjUtHJR22ag2caA1Y192Gzh1Xhc1IOi1cxy2sgt6qw463d23IgBAbjX1qJa1 additional records for this site. Please contact your EDR Account Executive for more information.
ECHO: Other Ascertainable Records
Envid: 1000155290
Registry ID: 110002740721
DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002740721 Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 24
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Region: CORTESE
Envirostor Id: Not Reported
Global ID: T0601300540
Site/Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
Status Date: Not Reported
Site Code: Not Reported
Latitude: Not Reported
Longitude: Not Reported
Owner: Not Reported
Enf Type: Not Reported
Swat R: Not Reported
Flag: active
Order No: Not Reported
Waste Discharge System No: Not Reported
Effective Date: Not Reported
Region 2: Not Reported
WID Id: Not Reported
Solid Waste Id No: Not Reported
Waste Management Uit Name: Not Reported
File Name: Active Open
HIST CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
edr_fname: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
edr_fadd1: 2500 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Region: CORTESE
Facility County Code: 7
Reg By: LTNKA
Reg Id: 07-0587
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0028130
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HMBP: 1K-10K LBS, 0-19 EMPLOYEES
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 771366
CERS ID: 10012105
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 25
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0028130
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG: 5 - <12 TONS/YEAR
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 771366
CERS ID: 10012105
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0028130
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 771366
CERS ID: 10012105
CERS: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 70796
CERS ID: 10012105
CERS Description: Chemical Storage Facilities
Violations:
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 06-24-2014
Citation: HSC 6.67 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.67, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/27/2014.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 26
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016. HWG REPORTING FORM Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS
Evaluation:
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 06-24-2014
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 27
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Enforcement Action:
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-24-2014
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Coordinates:
Site ID: 70796
Facility Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Env Int Type Code: LUSTCS
Program ID: T0601300540
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 28
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Coord Name: Not Reported
Ref Point Type Desc: Unknown
Latitude: 38.007673
Longitude: -122.288320
Affiliation:
Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 San Pablo AVE
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Property Owner
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 758-1325
Affiliation Type Desc: Regional Board Caseworker
Entity Name: MARTIN MUSONGE - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 1515 CLAY STREET
Affiliation City: OAKLAND
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Affiliation City: PINOLE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 29
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94546
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: OWNER
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr.
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Local Agency Caseworker
Entity Name: SUE LOYD - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.
Affiliation City: MARTINEZ
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: Patricia Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 30
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 70796
CERS ID: T0601300540
CERS Description: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Site Violations:
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 06-24-2014
Citation: HSC 6.67 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.67, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/27/2014.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Violation Date: 03-18-2016
Citation: HSC 6.5 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Haz Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 03/18/2016. HWG REPORTING FORM Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HW
Violation Source: CERS
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 31
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Evaluation:
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 03-18-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 04-05-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 06-24-2014
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HW
Eval Source: CERS
Enforcement Action:
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 32
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 03-18-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 70796
Site Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Site Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-24-2014
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HW
Enf Action Source: CERS
Coordinates:
Site ID: 70796
Facility Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Env Int Type Code: LUSTCS
Program ID: T0601300540
Coord Name: Not Reported
Ref Point Type Desc: Unknown
Latitude: 38.007673
Longitude: -122.288320
Affiliation:
Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Entity Title: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 33
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 San Pablo AVE
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Property Owner
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 758-1325
Affiliation Type Desc: Regional Board Caseworker
Entity Name: MARTIN MUSONGE - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 1515 CLAY STREET
Affiliation City: OAKLAND
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2500 SAN PABLO AVE
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94546
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: Rebecca Osman
Entity Title: OWNER
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 34
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 2656 Silverado Dr.
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Local Agency Caseworker
Entity Name: SUE LOYD - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.
Affiliation City: MARTINEZ
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: REBECCA OSMAN
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-3314
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: Patricia Osman
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: SQUARE DEAL GARAGE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 35
SQUARE DEAL GARAGE, 2500 SAN PABLIO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
OCU-EASE OPTICAL PRODUCTS
629 TENNANT AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000111603
◆ B6
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (739 ft. / 0.14 mi.)
1 ft. Lower Elevation 21 ft. Above Sea Level
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Chemicals of Concern: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: OCU-EASE OPTICAL PRODUCTS
Address: 629 TENNANT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032940
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG: LESS THAN 5 TONS/YEAR
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 770413
CERS ID: 10009345
PACIFIC BELL
636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000251249
◆ B7
SW 1/10 - 1/3 (836 ft. / 0.158 mi.)
1 ft. Lower Elevation 21 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Chemicals of Concern: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 36
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) RCRA-LQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19810119
Handler Name: PACIFIC BELL
Handler Address: 636 TENNENT AVENUE
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAT080020878
Contact Name: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
Contact Address: 636 TENNENT AVENUE
Contact City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94546
Contact Telephone: 408-491-6029
Contact Fax: Not Reported
Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Other
Federal Waste Generator Description: Large Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: CA
State District: 2
Mailing Address: 2 NORTH SECOND ST ROOM 1125
Mailing City,State,Zip: SAN JOSE, CA 95113
Owner Name: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: Not Reported
Operator Type: Not Reported
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: Yes
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:
No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:
No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 37
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:
N
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:
Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:
No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:
No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:
No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:
No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:
No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20020627
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:
No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: No
Manifest Broker: No
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Handler - Owner Operator:
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO Legal Status: Private
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 38
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:
Receive Date: 19810119
Handler Name: PACIFIC BELL
Federal Waste Generator Description: Large Quantity Generator State District Owner: CA
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:
No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
FINDS: Other Ascertainable Records
Registry ID: 110006487355
Click Here: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110006487355 Environmental Interest/Information System:
California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities.
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA.
The Click here to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. database contains http://www.edrnet.com/srf2/FinalSiteReport.aspx?ID=4kd4otkSldEf2EkoIytSN9H2S0llmH345Euif7772dEzTkIy58UIL2ygU34lSzKN3sBNfHLw2KE 9GR0xLlkCB7Nmw3HCc4D9kwjdTt2BPoWltTp8yYSDxlyC38REPFfpc4DeESgkei4VGIp3ybWBZMSOYNZI46oHxL2723FN0Fglrs4rskPPdBQ3W 3ouTtdd2JFSbNl8L8QrE0VfrjAXfE2rkdx2M8I3byE85WkS.3Nrl2NEHJ223c5gm0eIlVw9fnmw7HXP1w.4Aw5uj4rOuK.iXMunc79X7Ak4SHkhFd5M 34LopCte92E7SWplco3niEo2fgo27hEU2kL42UzIQfyJi2P5SIANPj4QzHO.2p772M0YQlMr3mzmqSHgV4eG4c65aE62ZuUQi0dByJ7TK75N2 additional records for this site. Please contact your EDR Account Executive for more information.
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 39
PACIFIC BELL, 636 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) ECHO: Other Ascertainable Records
Envid: 1000251249
Registry ID: 110006487355
DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110006487355 Name: PACIFIC BELL
Address: 636 TENNENT AVENUE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
HAROLD RICHMOND
2301 SAN PABLO AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 U001597869
▲ B8
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (972 ft. / 0.184 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
HIST UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: HAROLD RICHMOND
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
File Number: 00022EFD
URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00022EFD.pdf Region: STATE
Facility ID: 00000013126
Facility Type: Gas Station
Other Type: Not Reported
Contact Name: DEALER
Telephone: 4157243505
Owner Name: SHELL OIL COMPANY
Owner Address: P.O. BOX 4848
Owner City,St,Zip: ANAHEIM, CA 92803
Total Tanks: 0003
Tank Num: 001
Container Num: 1
Year Installed: 1980
Tank Capacity: 00010000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: PREMIUM
Container Construction Thickness: 1/4
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 40
HAROLD RICHMOND, 2301 SAN PABLO AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10 Tank Num: 002
Container Num: 3
Year Installed: 1980
Tank Capacity: 00010000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: UNLEADED
Container Construction Thickness: 1/4
Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10 Tank Num: 003
Container Num: 2
Year Installed: 1980
Tank Capacity: 00010000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: REGULAR
Container Construction Thickness: 1/4
Leak Detection: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10 Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: http://www.web.edrnet.com/ordering/switchboard/redirect.aspx?s=GRR_CA_HISTUST_PDF&img_id=000 22EFD
SHELL OIL CO
2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000288639
▲ B9
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (972 ft. / 0.184 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
RCRA-SQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19980408
Handler Name: SHELL OIL CO
Handler Address: 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAD981402134
Contact Name: SONDRA BIENVENU
Contact Address: P O BOX 4453
Contact City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77210-4453
Contact Telephone: 713-241-2258
Contact Fax: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 41
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Private
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: Not Reported
State District: Not Reported
Mailing Address: P O BOX 4453
Mailing City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77210-4453
Owner Name: EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: Not Reported
Operator Type: Not Reported
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:
No
Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:
No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:
NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:
Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 42
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:
No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:
No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:
No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:
No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:
No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20021007
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:
No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Hazardous Waste Summary:
Waste Code: D001
Waste Description: IGNITABLE WASTE
Waste Code: D018
Waste Description: BENZENE
Handler - Owner Operator:
Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 43
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: P O BOX 4453
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: HOUSTON, TX 77210-4453
Owner/Operator Telephone: 713-241-2258
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:
Receive Date: 19960901
Handler Name: SHELL OIL CO
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: Not Reported
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:
No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: No
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Receive Date: 19980408
Handler Name: SHELL OIL CO
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: Not Reported
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:
No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
Violations: No Violations Found
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 44
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
LUST: Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Lead Agency: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)
Case Type: LUST Cleanup Site
Geo Track: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0601300264 Global Id: T0601300264
Latitude: 38.006394
Longitude: -122.290037
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 09/24/2007
Case Worker: Not Reported
RB Case Number: 07-0284
Local Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
File Location: Not Reported
Local Case Number: 13126
Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline, Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon Site History: Not Reported
LUST:
Global Id: T0601300264
Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker
Contact Name: SUE LOYD
Organization Name: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.
City: MARTINEZ
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: Not Reported
LUST:
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 09/24/2007
Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/31/2006
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/05/2001
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 45
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/16/2001
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 11/06/2019
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/12/1988
Action: Respond to Petition
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/10/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/01/2006
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/03/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/02/2001
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 11/06/2019
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/27/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 46
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/11/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/02/2001
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/27/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/03/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/24/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/16/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/28/2019
Action: Correspondence
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/16/2007
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/10/1994
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 47
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Well Destruction Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/26/2002
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/15/1991
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/23/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/03/2000
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/24/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/31/2019
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/19/2006
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/16/2003
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 48
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/04/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Well Installation Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 03/28/2007
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 06/06/2006
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 11/03/2006
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 10/04/2006
Action: 13267 Requirement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/21/2001
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: Other
Date: 03/20/1984
Action: Leak Reported
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/04/2007
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/16/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/29/2001
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 49
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/02/1998
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/30/1989
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/25/1989
Action: Well Installation Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/01/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/12/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/09/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/08/1999
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/03/2001
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/06/1998
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/07/1989
Action: Other Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 02/03/2005
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 50
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/28/2002
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 12/17/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/01/2006
Action: Site Assessment Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/23/2004
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 03/20/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/13/1992
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 10/30/2006
Action: Other Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 05/24/2004
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 12/06/2004
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 02/27/2004
Action: * Verbal Communication
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 09/30/2004
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 51
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 09/21/2004
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: Other
Date: 07/20/1987
Action: Leak Stopped
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/03/2004
Action: Other Workplan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/31/2004
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 11/22/2004
Action: CAP/RAP - Final Remediation / Design Plan
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/04/2007
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/19/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 09/26/2002
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 04/30/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 01/30/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/30/2003
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 52
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/05/2005
Action: Unknown
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/30/2007
Action: CAP/RAP - Other Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/30/2004
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 07/12/2001
Action: * Historical Enforcement
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: ENFORCEMENT
Date: 06/19/2002
Action: Staff Letter
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: Other
Date: 07/20/1987
Action: Leak Discovery
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/06/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/05/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/04/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/03/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/02/2003
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 53
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/01/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/30/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/29/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/28/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/27/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/26/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/25/2003
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 05/24/2003
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/27/2007
Action: CAP/RAP - Other Report
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 07/12/2019
Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 06/30/2004
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 54
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: RESPONSE
Date: 08/16/2001
Action: Other Report / Document
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: REMEDIATION
Date: 05/21/2007
Action: Excavation
Global Id: T0601300264
Action Type: REMEDIATION
Date: 05/21/2007
Action: Other (Use Description Field)
LUST:
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Case Begin Date
Status Date: 03/20/1984
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 12/12/1988
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Site Assessment
Status Date: 06/21/1989
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 02/01/2001
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 11/23/2004
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 12/02/2004
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Remediation
Status Date: 07/27/2007
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Open - Verification Monitoring
Status Date: 07/31/2007
Global Id: T0601300264
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Status Date: 09/24/2007
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 55
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) LUST REG 2:
Region: 2
Facility Id: 07-0284
Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway
Case Number: 13126
How Discovered: Tank Closure
Leak Cause: Structure Failure
Leak Source: Tank
Date Leak Confirmed: Not Reported
Oversight Program: LUST
Prelim. Site Assesment Wokplan
Submitted:
Not Reported
Preliminary Site Assesment Began: 12/12/1988
Pollution Characterization Began: 6/21/1989
Pollution Remediation Plan
Submitted:
Not Reported
Date Remediation Action Underway: 2/1/2001
Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring
Began:
Not Reported
SWEEPS UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: 6054-0204-SU-1
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000001
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10000
Active Date: 02-26-93
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: PRM UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: 4
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 56
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: 6054-0204-RU-1
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000002
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10000
Active Date: 02-25-93
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: 6054-0204-REG1
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000003
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10000
Active Date: 02-26-93
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 13126
Number: 1
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: 02-26-93
Action Date: 06-09-93
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000005
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 550
Active Date: 06-20-88
Tank Use: OIL
STG: W
Content: WASTE OIL
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 57
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Name: JACKSONS SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 13126
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: 44-000074
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-013126-000004
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 550
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: OIL
STG: WASTE
Content: WASTE OIL
Number Of Tanks: 1
CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Region: CORTESE
Envirostor Id: Not Reported
Global ID: T0601300264
Site/Facility Type: LUST CLEANUP SITE
Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
Status Date: Not Reported
Site Code: Not Reported
Latitude: Not Reported
Longitude: Not Reported
Owner: Not Reported
Enf Type: Not Reported
Swat R: Not Reported
Flag: active
Order No: Not Reported
Waste Discharge System No: Not Reported
Effective Date: Not Reported
Region 2: Not Reported
WID Id: Not Reported
Solid Waste Id No: Not Reported
Waste Management Uit Name: Not Reported
File Name: Active Open
ENF: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 58
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: 2
Facility Id: 260941
Agency Name: Shell Oil Company - Concord
Place Type: Facility
Place Subtype: Not Reported
Facility Type: All other facilities
Agency Type: Privately-Owned Business
# Of Agencies: 1
Place Latitude: Not Reported
Place Longitude: Not Reported
SIC Code 1: Not Reported
SIC Desc 1: Not Reported
SIC Code 2: Not Reported
SIC Desc 2: Not Reported
SIC Code 3: Not Reported
SIC Desc 3: Not Reported
NAICS Code 1: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 1: Not Reported
NAICS Code 2: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 2: Not Reported
NAICS Code 3: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 3: Not Reported
# Of Places: 1
Source Of Facility: Reg Meas
Design Flow: Not Reported
Threat To Water Quality: Not Reported
Complexity: Not Reported
Pretreatment: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 2: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 3: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 4: Not Reported
Program: UST
Program Category1: TANKS
Program Category2: TANKS
# Of Programs: 1
WDID: 2 07-0284
Reg Measure Id: 168570
Reg Measure Type: Unregulated
Region: 2
Order #: Not Reported
Npdes# CA#: Not Reported
Major-Minor: Not Reported
Npdes Type: Not Reported
Reclamation: Not Reported
Dredge Fill Fee: Not Reported
301H: Not Reported
Application Fee Amt Received: Not Reported
Status: Never Active
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 59
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Status Date: 02/20/2013
Effective Date: Not Reported
Expiration/Review Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
WDR Review - Amend: Not Reported
WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not Reported
WDR Review - Rescind: Not Reported
WDR Review - No Action Required: Not Reported
WDR Review - Pending: Not Reported
WDR Review - Planned: Not Reported
Status Enrollee: N
Individual/General: I
Fee Code: Not Reported
Direction/Voice: Passive
Enforcement Id(EID): 239094
Region: 2
Order / Resolution Number: UNKNOWN
Enforcement Action Type: 13267 Letter
Effective Date: 12/18/2001
Adoption/Issuance Date: Not Reported
Achieve Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
ACL Issuance Date: Not Reported
EPL Issuance Date: Not Reported
Status: Active
Title: Enforcement - 2 07-0284
Description: Not Reported
Program: UST
Latest Milestone Completion Date: 3/28/2002
# Of Programs1: 1
Total Assessment Amount: 0
Initial Assessed Amount: 0
Liability $ Amount: 0
Project $ Amount: 0
Liability $ Paid: 0
Project $ Completed: 0
Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: 2
Facility Id: 260941
Agency Name: Shell Oil Company - Concord
Place Type: Facility
Place Subtype: Not Reported
Facility Type: All other facilities
Agency Type: Privately-Owned Business
# Of Agencies: 1
Place Latitude: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 60
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Place Longitude: Not Reported
SIC Code 1: Not Reported
SIC Desc 1: Not Reported
SIC Code 2: Not Reported
SIC Desc 2: Not Reported
SIC Code 3: Not Reported
SIC Desc 3: Not Reported
NAICS Code 1: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 1: Not Reported
NAICS Code 2: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 2: Not Reported
NAICS Code 3: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 3: Not Reported
# Of Places: 1
Source Of Facility: Reg Meas
Design Flow: Not Reported
Threat To Water Quality: Not Reported
Complexity: Not Reported
Pretreatment: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 2: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 3: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 4: Not Reported
Program: UST
Program Category1: TANKS
Program Category2: TANKS
# Of Programs: 1
WDID: 2 07-0284
Reg Measure Id: 168570
Reg Measure Type: Unregulated
Region: 2
Order #: Not Reported
Npdes# CA#: Not Reported
Major-Minor: Not Reported
Npdes Type: Not Reported
Reclamation: Not Reported
Dredge Fill Fee: Not Reported
301H: Not Reported
Application Fee Amt Received: Not Reported
Status: Never Active
Status Date: 02/20/2013
Effective Date: Not Reported
Expiration/Review Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
WDR Review - Amend: Not Reported
WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not Reported
WDR Review - Rescind: Not Reported
WDR Review - No Action Required: Not Reported
WDR Review - Pending: Not Reported
WDR Review - Planned: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 61
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Status Enrollee: N
Individual/General: I
Fee Code: Not Reported
Direction/Voice: Passive
Enforcement Id(EID): 238226
Region: 2
Order / Resolution Number: UNKNOWN
Enforcement Action Type: 13267 Letter
Effective Date: 07/21/2001
Adoption/Issuance Date: Not Reported
Achieve Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
ACL Issuance Date: Not Reported
EPL Issuance Date: Not Reported
Status: Historical
Title: Enforcement - 2 07-0284
Description: Not Reported
Program: UST
Latest Milestone Completion Date: 10/5/2001
# Of Programs1: 1
Total Assessment Amount: 0
Initial Assessed Amount: 0
Liability $ Amount: 0
Project $ Amount: 0
Liability $ Paid: 0
Project $ Completed: 0
Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: 2
Facility Id: 260941
Agency Name: Shell Oil Company - Concord
Place Type: Facility
Place Subtype: Not Reported
Facility Type: All other facilities
Agency Type: Privately-Owned Business
# Of Agencies: 1
Place Latitude: Not Reported
Place Longitude: Not Reported
SIC Code 1: Not Reported
SIC Desc 1: Not Reported
SIC Code 2: Not Reported
SIC Desc 2: Not Reported
SIC Code 3: Not Reported
SIC Desc 3: Not Reported
NAICS Code 1: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 1: Not Reported
NAICS Code 2: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 62
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) NAICS Desc 2: Not Reported
NAICS Code 3: Not Reported
NAICS Desc 3: Not Reported
# Of Places: 1
Source Of Facility: Reg Meas
Design Flow: Not Reported
Threat To Water Quality: Not Reported
Complexity: Not Reported
Pretreatment: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 2: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 3: Not Reported
Facility Waste Type 4: Not Reported
Program: UST
Program Category1: TANKS
Program Category2: TANKS
# Of Programs: 1
WDID: 2 07-0284
Reg Measure Id: 168570
Reg Measure Type: Unregulated
Region: 2
Order #: Not Reported
Npdes# CA#: Not Reported
Major-Minor: Not Reported
Npdes Type: Not Reported
Reclamation: Not Reported
Dredge Fill Fee: Not Reported
301H: Not Reported
Application Fee Amt Received: Not Reported
Status: Never Active
Status Date: 02/20/2013
Effective Date: Not Reported
Expiration/Review Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
WDR Review - Amend: Not Reported
WDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not Reported
WDR Review - Rescind: Not Reported
WDR Review - No Action Required: Not Reported
WDR Review - Pending: Not Reported
WDR Review - Planned: Not Reported
Status Enrollee: N
Individual/General: I
Fee Code: Not Reported
Direction/Voice: Passive
Enforcement Id(EID): 236461
Region: 2
Order / Resolution Number: UNKNOWN
Enforcement Action Type: 13267 Letter
Effective Date: 02/21/2001
Adoption/Issuance Date: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 63
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Achieve Date: Not Reported
Termination Date: Not Reported
ACL Issuance Date: Not Reported
EPL Issuance Date: Not Reported
Status: Historical
Title: Enforcement - 2 07-0284
Description: Not Reported
Program: UST
Latest Milestone Completion Date: 4/4/2001
# Of Programs1: 1
Total Assessment Amount: 0
Initial Assessed Amount: 0
Liability $ Amount: 0
Project $ Amount: 0
Liability $ Paid: 0
Project $ Completed: 0
Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0
HIST CORTESE: Other Ascertainable Records
edr_fname: SHELL
edr_fadd1: 2301 SAN PABLO
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA
Region: CORTESE
Facility County Code: 7
Reg By: LTNKA
Reg Id: 07-0284
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: JACKSON'S SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0031645
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HMBP GENERAL
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 713126
CERS ID: 10005817
Name: JACKSON'S SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0031645
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG GENERAL
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 713126
CERS ID: 10005817
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 64
SHELL OIL CO, 2301 SAN PABLO/TENNANT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Name: JACKSON'S SHELL #1
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0031645
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 713126
CERS ID: 10005817
CERS: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: SHELL
Address: 2301 SAN PABLO AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 213908
CERS ID: T0601300264
CERS Description: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Site Affiliation:
Affiliation Type Desc: Local Agency Caseworker
Entity Name: SUE LOYD - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4333 PACHECO BLVD.
Affiliation City: MARTINEZ
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Regional Board Caseworker
Entity Name: BARBARA SIEMINSKI - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 1515 CLAY STREET, SUITE 1400
Affiliation City: OAKLAND
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
JACKSONS SHELL
2301 SAN PABLO AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1020983913
▲ B10
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (972 ft. / 0.184 mi.)
5 ft. Higher Elevation 27 ft. Above Sea Level
EDR Exclusive Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 65
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Records
Year: Name: / Type:
1969: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1970: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1971: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1972: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1973: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1974: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1975: RICHMOND HAROLD E / Gasoline Service Stations
1976: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1977: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1978: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1979: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1980: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1982: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1983: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1985: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1986: RICHMOND SHELL SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1987: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations
1988: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations
1989: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1990: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1991: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1992: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1993: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1994: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1995: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1996: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1997: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1998: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
1999: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2006: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2007: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2008: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2009: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2010: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2011: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
2012: JACKSONS SHELL / Gasoline Service Stations, NEC
PUMP HOUSE
700 TENNENT AVE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 U003784209
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 66
▲ B11
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1106 ft. / 0.21 mi.)
7 ft. Higher Elevation 29 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
UST: Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Facility ID: 07000758769
Permitting Agency: Contra Costa County Health Services Department CERSID: 10007872
Latitude: 38.005165
Longitude: -122.291008
SWEEPS UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 58769
Number: 2
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: 02-24-94
Action Date: 04-16-94
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: UNKNOWN
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000004
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 5500
Active Date: 02-24-94
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: PRM UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: 2
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Active
Comp Number: 58769
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 67
PUMP HOUSE, 700 TENNENT AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Number: 2
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: 02-24-94
Action Date: 04-16-94
Created Date: 07-22-88
Owner Tank Id: UNKNOWN
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000005
Tank Status: A
Capacity: 10500
Active Date: 02-24-94
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: P
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 58769
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000001
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 5000
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: WASTE
Content: UNLEADED PLU
Number Of Tanks: 3
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 58769
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000002
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 2000
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 68
PUMP HOUSE, 700 TENNENT AVE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) STG: WASTE
Content: PRM UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Status: Not Reported
Comp Number: 58769
Number: Not Reported
Board Of Equalization: Not Reported
Referral Date: Not Reported
Action Date: Not Reported
Created Date: Not Reported
Owner Tank Id: Not Reported
SWRCB Tank Id: 07-000-058769-000003
Tank Status: Not Reported
Capacity: 6000
Active Date: Not Reported
Tank Use: M.V. FUEL
STG: WASTE
Content: REG UNLEADED
Number Of Tanks: Not Reported
STACYS CHEVRON
700 TENMENT, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1020427720
▲ B12
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1106 ft. / 0.21 mi.)
7 ft. Higher Elevation 29 ft. Above Sea Level
EDR Exclusive Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Records
Year: Name: / Type:
1969: ROBERTS JOE CHEVRON SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1970: ROBERTS JOE CHEVRON SERVICE / Gasoline Service Stations 1972: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1973: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1974: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1974: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 69
STACYS CHEVRON, 700 TENMENT, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) 1975: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1975: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1975: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1976: HAMMER JIM CHEVRON STATION / Gasoline Service Stations 1976: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1977: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1978: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1979: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1979: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1980: STACYS CHEVRON / Gasoline Service Stations
1996: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
1997: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
1998: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
1999: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2000: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2001: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2002: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2003: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2004: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2005: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2006: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2007: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2008: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2009: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2010: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2011: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2013: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
2014: PUMP HOUSE / Liquor Stores
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON)
700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA, 94564 U001597882
▲ B13
SSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1106 ft. / 0.21 mi.)
7 ft. Higher Elevation 29 ft. Above Sea Level
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is cross-gradient. The distance between the source and the target property is greater than the critical distance plus a factor to account for plume width.
Conditions:
Both COC & PHC: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Crossgradient: YES
HIST UST: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON)
Address: 700 TENNENT AVENUE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 70
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
File Number: 00022790
URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00022790.pdf Region: STATE
Facility ID: 00000058769
Facility Type: Gas Station
Other Type: Not Reported
Contact Name: JERRY BUTLER, MANAGER
Telephone: 4157246831
Owner Name: ALBERT L. TORRETTA
Owner Address: 784 TENNENT AVENUE
Owner City,St,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Total Tanks: 0003
Tank Num: 001
Container Num: #2
Year Installed: 1976
Tank Capacity: 00005000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: REGULAR
Container Construction Thickness: Not Reported
Leak Detection: Visual
Tank Num: 002
Container Num: #3
Year Installed: 1976
Tank Capacity: 00002000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: UNLEADED
Container Construction Thickness: Not Reported
Leak Detection: Visual
Tank Num: 003
Container Num: #1
Year Installed: 1976
Tank Capacity: 00006000
Tank Used for: PRODUCT
Type of Fuel: UNLEADED
Container Construction Thickness: Not Reported
Leak Detection: Visual
Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: http://www.web.edrnet.com/ordering/switchboard/redirect.aspx?s=GRR_CA_HISTUST_PDF&img_id=000 22790
CERS TANKS: Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 145350
CERS ID: 10007872
CERS Description: Underground Storage Tank
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 71
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032449
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HMBP: >10K-100K LBS, 0-19 EMPLOYEES
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 758769
CERS ID: 10007872
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032449
Billing Status: ACTIVE, BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 758769
CERS ID: 10007872
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032449
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG GENERAL
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 758769
CERS ID: 10007872
CERS: Other Ascertainable Records
Name: PUMP HOUSE
Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Site ID: 145350
CERS ID: 10007872
CERS Description: Chemical Storage Facilities
Violations:
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-05-2021
Citation: 23 CCR 16 2636(f)(4) - California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Chapter 16, Section(s) 2636(f)(4)
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 72
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Violation Description: Failure to meet one or more of the following monitoring requirements in lieu of the requirement to be tightness tested every 12 months: The monitoring system maintains all product piping outside the dispenser to be fail-safe and shut down the pump when a leak is detected. The monitoring system shuts down the pump or stops flow when a leak is detected in the under dispenser containment (UDC).
Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/05/2021. OBSERVATION: Owner/Operator, in lieu of annual tightness testing, failed to maintain all product piping, outside the dispenser, to be fail-safe and capable of shutting down the pump when a leak is detected and a monitoring system capable of shutting down the pump or stops the flow when a leak is detected in the under dispenser containment. During the facility's annual monitoring system certification none of the UDC's Bravo float and chain systems were able to shut off the flow to a dispenser when challenge tested with liquid. CORRECTIVE ACTION: The facility is required to maintain all product piping outside the dispenser to be fail-safe and shut down the pump when a leak is detected and the monitoring system shuts down the pump or stops the flow (flow restriction) when a leak is detected in the under dispenser containment. Technicians were able to repair/resolve all faulty float and chain shut off devices during the annual monitoring system certification, no further action [Truncated] Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-09-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/29/2016.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-19-2016
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/29/2016.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-17-2018
Citation: HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) 25505(a)(4) Violation Description: Failure to provide initial and annual training to all employees in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material or failure to document and maintain training records for a minimum of three years.
Violation Notes: OBSERVATION: The business failed to provide initial and annual training to all employees in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material including familiarity with the emergency response plan or failure to document and maintain training records for a minimum of three years. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Establish and electronically submit an employee training program containing provisions to ensure initial and annual training for all employees in safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous material and document and maintain training records for a minimum of three years.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-17-2018
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 73
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Citation: HSC 6.95 25505(c) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) 25505(c) Violation Description: Failure to have a business plan readily available to personnel of the business or the unified program facility with responsibilities for emergency response or training.
Violation Notes: OBSERVATION: The business failed to have the hazardous material business plan readily available to personnel of the business or the unified program facility with responsibilities for emergency response or training. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Provide a readily available business plan to personnel of the business or the unified program facility with responsibilities for emergency response or training. Document that appropriate personnel have the business plan readily availible.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 06-05-2015
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Training - For use of Local Ordinance only.
Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/15/2015.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 06-24-2014
Citation: HSC 6.95 Multiple - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.95, Section(s) Multiple Violation Description: Business Plan Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 07/09/2014.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: HMRRP
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-01-2013
Citation: HSC 6.7 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.7, Section(s) Multiple Sections Violation Description: UST Program - Administration/Documentation - General Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/20/2014.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-19-2016
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Operations/Maintenance - For use of Local Ordinance only.
Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/19/2016.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 74
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Violation Date: 05-01-2015
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Administration/Documentation - For use of Local Ordinance only Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/08/2015.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-17-2018
Citation: HSC 6.7 25291(b) - California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.7, Section(s) 25291(b) Violation Description: Failure of the UST system to be designed and constructed with a monitoring system capable of detecting the entry of the hazardous substance into the secondary containment.
Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/17/2018. OBSERVATION: Owner/Operator failed to design or construct a UST system with a monitoring system capable of detecting the entry of the hazardous substance into the secondary containment. Secondary containment did not detect a liquid at any of the UDC's.
CORRECTIVE ACTION: None, repaired and corrected on site.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 05-09-2016
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Administration/Documentation - For use of Local Ordinance only Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 05/11/2016.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Violation Date: 06-05-2015
Citation: Un-Specified
Violation Description: UST Program - Operations/Maintenance - For use of Local Ordinance only.
Violation Notes: Returned to compliance on 06/15/2015.
Violation Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Violation Program: UST
Violation Source: CERS
Evaluation:
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-05-2021
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 75
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Date: 05-06-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-19-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 06-09-2017
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 06-24-2014
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 09-08-2020
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-05-2021
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 76
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-09-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-09-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-19-2016
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-20-2014
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-22-2017
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-17-2018
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 77
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-20-2014
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 06-05-2015
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 08-06-2018
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-01-2013
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Other/Unknown
Eval Date: 05-01-2015
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Other, not routine, done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-06-2019
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 78
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 05-17-2018
Violations Found: Yes
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: HMRRP
Eval Source: CERS
Eval General Type: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Eval Date: 06-15-2015
Violations Found: No
Eval Type: Routine done by local agency
Eval Notes: Not Reported
Eval Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Eval Program: UST
Eval Source: CERS
Enforcement Action:
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-01-2013
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-01-2015
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 79
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-05-2021
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-09-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-09-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-17-2018
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 80
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-17-2018
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-19-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 05-19-2016
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-05-2015
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: UST
Enf Action Source: CERS
Site ID: 145350
Site Name: PUMP HOUSE
Site Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 81
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Site City: PINOLE
Site Zip: 94564
Enf Action Date: 06-24-2014
Enf Action Type: Notice of Violation (Unified Program)
Enf Action Description: Notice of Violation Issued by the Inspector at the Time of Inspection Enf Action Notes: Not Reported
Enf Action Division: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Enf Action Program: HMRRP
Enf Action Source: CERS
Coordinates:
Site ID: 145350
Facility Name: PUMP HOUSE
Env Int Type Code: HMBP
Program ID: 10007872
Coord Name: Not Reported
Ref Point Type Desc: Unknown
Latitude: 38.005161
Longitude: -122.290993
Affiliation:
Affiliation Type Desc: Environmental Contact
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 TENNENT AVE
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564-1722
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Identification Signer
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Operator
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Parent Corporation
Entity Name: PUMP HOUSE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 82
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Affiliation Type Desc: UST Permit Applicant
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Operator
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: UST Property Owner Name
Entity Name: Bill Mcdaniel
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (707) 847-3909
Affiliation Type Desc: UST Tank Operator
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: UST Tank Owner
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 9549
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: CUPA District
Entity Name: Contra Costa County Health Services Department Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 4585 Pacheco BlvdSuite 100
Affiliation City: Martinez
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94553
Affiliation Phone: (925) 655-3200
Affiliation Type Desc: Facility Mailing Address
Entity Name: Mailing Address
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 83
YE OLD PUMP HOUSE (CHEVRON), 700 TENNENT AVENUE, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: Pinole
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Legal Owner
Entity Name: PUMP HOUSE
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: 700 Tennent Ave
Affiliation City: PINOLE
Affiliation State: CA
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: 94564
Affiliation Phone: (510) 724-6831
Affiliation Type Desc: Document Preparer
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: Not Reported
Affiliation Type Desc: Operator
Entity Name: Tajinder Singh
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: Not Reported
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (510) 230-9549
Affiliation Type Desc: Property Owner
Entity Name: Bill Mcdaniel
Entity Title: Not Reported
Affiliation Address: Not Reported
Affiliation City: Not Reported
Affiliation State: Not Reported
Affiliation Country: United States
Affiliation Zip: Not Reported
Affiliation Phone: (707) 847-3909
R R & H PAVING & GRADING
440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA, 94564 1000100410
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 84
▲ 14
WSW 1/10 - 1/3 (1118 ft. / 0.212 mi.)
64 ft. Higher Elevation 86 ft. Above Sea Level
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Other Ascertainable Records
Worksheet:
Impact on Target Property: VEC does not exist
Comments: The source is not within the area of concern, based on its distance, gradient and suspected chemical of concern.
Chemicals of concern are not likely to be present at this source.
The source is down-gradient and beyond the critical distance.
Conditions:
Chemicals of Concern: YES
Groundwater Flow Gradient:
Downgradient: YES
RCRA-SQG: Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Date Form Received by Agency: 19960901
Handler Name: R R & H PAVING & GRADING
Handler Address: 440 BUENA VISTA
Handler City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
EPA ID: CAD096230180
Contact Name: Not Reported
Contact Address: Not Reported
Contact City,State,Zip: Not Reported
Contact Telephone: Not Reported
Contact Fax: Not Reported
Contact Email: Not Reported
Contact Title: Not Reported
EPA Region: 09
Land Type: Not Reported
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Non-Notifier: Not Reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not Reported
Accessibility: Not Reported
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
State District Owner: CA
State District: 2
Mailing Address: BUENA VISTA
Mailing City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
Owner Name: HARCOURT ROBERT L
Owner Type: Private
Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Operator Type: Private
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Importer Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Transporter Activity: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner
Exemption:
No
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 85
R R & H PAVING & GRADING, 440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Smelting Melting and Refining
Furnace Exemption:
No
Underground Injection Control: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Federal Universal Waste: No
Active Site Fed-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site Converter Treatment
storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Treatment
Storage and Disposal Facility:
Not Reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Facility Indicator: Not Reported
Hazardous Secondary Material
Indicator:
NN
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not Reported
Commercial TSD Indicator: No
Treatment Storage and Disposal
Type:
Not Reported
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Permit Renewals Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Workload Universe: Not Reported
Permit Progress Universe: Not Reported
Post-Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
Closure Workload Universe: Not Reported
202 GPRA Corrective Action
Baseline:
No
Corrective Action Workload Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has
Been Imposed Universe:
No
TSDFs Potentially Subject to CA
Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
No
TSDFs Only Subject to CA under
Discretionary Auth Universe:
No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Operating TSDF Universe: Not Reported
Full Enforcement Universe: Not Reported
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant NonComplier Universe:No
Addressed Significant Non-Complier
Universe:
No
Significant Non-Complier With a
Compliance Schedule Universe:
No
Financial Assurance Required: Not Reported
Handler Date of Last Change: 20000915
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 86
R R & H PAVING & GRADING, 440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid
Batteries:
No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not Reported
Manifest Broker: Not Reported
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Handler - Owner Operator:
Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Name: HARCOURT ROBERT L
Legal Status: Private
Date Became Current: Not Reported
Date Ended Current: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not Reported
Owner/Operator Email: Not Reported
Historic Generators:
Receive Date: 19960901
Handler Name: R R & H PAVING & GRADING
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator State District Owner: CA
Large Quantity Handler of Universal
Waste:
No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Current Record: Yes
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not Reported
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not Reported
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 87
R R & H PAVING & GRADING, 440 BUENA VISTA, PINOLE, CA 94564 (Continued) NAICS Codes: No NAICS Codes Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
Violations: No Violations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
FINDS: Other Ascertainable Records
Registry ID: 110002665072
Click Here: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110002665072 Environmental Interest/Information System:
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA.
The Click here to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. database contains http://www.edrnet.com/srf2/FinalSiteReport.aspx?ID=48i4g58DHiW320.g7g5rn9eLDgUHlM37HWfh3gv7OX0I..G.5MN7fJgOP3UbruVnMWBuuen kLJ293AgVVUQKBbRlRsMYz4Mg8LliHA29Sgci5hC8WHDDuHTc3miWIJ3Cz4Gi0ee.JS4aA7yCgy7BCzrYinEO4vueqsLrp3UBgBOU4f4FS8JFio H3NRgmF5sx2YtDScHgr8FMW.B3pjAXA08R.T42Fc7JYg945wCrDbn9S2N6egeLD35IygUAUGF9dul2IMji1TP7NeHAr4u7fjuhdjuotgG5vqh4wj8g 6iHh3Hygjw5o52VdDKnHHm3DKWcf3mA2jb0z6.lg2vT7KigIA2xXr6tnnR3Ojeh5LZG2WXgSOUMi2.pll9MW.69w7baHl23gZfKghZj2DYgNPv5k2 additional records for this site. Please contact your EDR Account Executive for more information.
ECHO: Other Ascertainable Records
Envid: 1000100410
Registry ID: 110002665072
DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002665072 Name: R R & H PAVING & GRADING
Address: 440 BUENA VISTA
City,State,Zip: PINOLE, CA 94564
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Other Ascertainable Records Name: RR & H PAVING & GRADING
Address: 440 BUENA VISTA DR
City: PINOLE
Facility ID: FA0032957
Billing Status: INACTIVE, NON-BILLABLE
Program Status: CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST
Program/Elements: HWG: LESS THAN 5 TONS/YEAR
Region: CONTRA COSTA
Cupa Number: 770432
CERS ID: 10009396
MAP FINDINGS
TC Page 88
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site listUS NPL National Priority List EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens EPA 10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994Federal CERCLIS listUS SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities listUS CORRACTS Corrective Action Report EPA 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021Federal RCRA TSD facilities listUS RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021Federal RCRA generators listUS RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021US RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionall Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registriesUS LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 07/12/2021 08/06/2021 10/22/2021US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 08/23/2021 08/23/2021 11/12/2021US US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 08/23/2021 08/23/2021 11/12/2021Federal ERNS listUS ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 09/13/2021 09/21/2021 12/15/2021State and tribal - equivalent NPLCA RESPONSE State Response Sites Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021State and tribal - equivalent CERCLISCA ENVIROSTOR EnviroStor Database Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021State and tribal landfill / solid waste disposalCA SWF/LF (SWIS) Solid Waste Information System Department of Resources Recycling and Recover 08/09/2021 08/10/2021 11/05/2021State and tribal leaking storage tank listsCA LUST Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA LUST REG 5 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 07/01/2008 07/22/2008 07/31/2008CA LUST REG 6L Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/09/2003 09/10/2003 10/07/2003CA LUST REG 6V Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 06/07/2005 06/07/2005 06/29/2005CA LUST REG 1 Active Toxic Site Investigation California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/01/2001 02/28/2001 03/29/2001CA LUST REG 2 Fuel Leak List California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA LUST REG 3 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/19/2003 05/19/2003 06/02/2003 TC6803037.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date CA LUST REG 4 Underground Storage Tank Leak List California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004 CA LUST REG 7 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/26/2004 02/26/2004 03/24/2004CA LUST REG 8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 02/14/2005 02/15/2005 03/28/2005CA LUST REG 9 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 03/01/2001 04/23/2001 05/21/2001US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/28/2021 06/22/2021 09/20/2021US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 04/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 06/01/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1 04/28/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 05/17/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 5 04/06/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021CA CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA SLIC REG 1 Active Toxic Site Investigations California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 04/03/2003 04/07/2003 04/25/2003CA SLIC REG 2 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board San Fran 09/30/2004 10/20/2004 11/19/2004CA SLIC REG 3 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 05/18/2006 05/18/2006 06/15/2006CA SLIC REG 4 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angele 11/17/2004 11/18/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 5 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board Central 04/01/2005 04/05/2005 04/21/2005CA SLIC REG 6V Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorv 05/24/2005 05/25/2005 06/16/2005CA SLIC REG 6L SLIC Sites California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/07/2004 09/07/2004 10/12/2004CA SLIC REG 7 SLIC List California Regional Quality Control Board, Co 11/24/2004 11/29/2004 01/04/2005CA SLIC REG 8 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Region Water Quality Control Board 04/03/2008 04/03/2008 04/14/2008CA SLIC REG 9 Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing California Regional Water Quality Control Boa 09/10/2007 09/11/2007 09/28/2007State and tribal registered storage tank listsCA UST Active UST Facilities SWRCB 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/30/2021CA MILITARY UST SITES Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA UST CLOSURE Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases State Water Resources Control Board 08/18/2021 09/08/2021 12/03/2021CA AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities California Environmental Protection Agency 07/06/2016 07/12/2016 09/19/2016US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 9 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 05/17/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 05/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 5 04/06/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 04/27/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 1 04/28/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/28/2021 06/22/2021 09/20/2021US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 06/01/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA 01/29/2021 02/17/2021 03/22/2021State and tribal voluntary cleanup sitesUS INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng EPA, Region 7 03/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008US INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EPA, Region 1 07/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016CA VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021 TC6803037.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date State and tribal Brownfields sites
CA BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing State Water Resources Control Board 09/20/2021 09/21/2021 12/08/2021Other RecordsUS CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 06/30/2021 07/14/2021 07/16/2021US ROD Records Of Decision EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Environmental Protection Agency 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021CA HIST CAL-SITES Calsites Database Department of Toxic Substance Control 08/08/2005 08/03/2006 08/24/2006US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 9 01/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009CA SWRCY Recycler Database Department of Conservation 09/07/2021 09/08/2021 11/29/2021CA CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database California Environmental Protection Agency 10/31/1994 09/05/1995 09/29/1995CA HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database State Water Resources Control Board 10/15/1990 01/25/1991 02/12/1991CA SAN FRANCISCO AST Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing San Francisco County Department of Public Hea 08/05/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing State Water Resources Control Board 06/01/1994 07/07/2005 08/11/2005US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 09/28/2021US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 07/26/2021 07/27/2021 10/22/2021US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 05/18/2021 05/18/2021 08/03/2021US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter Sites Environmental Protection Agency 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter Sites American Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 09/30/2017 05/08/2018 07/20/2018US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2019 12/01/2020 02/09/2021US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2019 11/06/2019 02/10/2020US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 01/12/2017 03/05/2019 11/11/2019US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2017 02/03/2017 04/07/2017US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST Environmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System Data EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/29/2021US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2021 09/15/2021 10/12/2021US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 09/12/2021 09/13/2021 09/28/2021US DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 01/02/2020 01/28/2020 04/17/2020US US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Drug Enforcement Administration 05/18/2021 05/18/2021 08/03/2021US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Environmental Protection Agency 06/10/2021 06/10/2021 08/17/2021US DOD Department of Defense Sites USGS 12/31/2005 11/10/2006 01/11/2007US FEDLAND Federal and Indian Lands U.S. Geological Survey 04/02/2018 04/11/2018 11/06/2019US FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 08/10/2021 08/17/2021 10/22/2021US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Department of Energy 08/30/2019 11/15/2019 01/28/2020US ODI Open Dump Inventory Environmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004US US MINES Mines Master Index File Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 08/09/2021 08/24/2021 11/19/2021US MINES VIOLATIONS MSHA Violation Assessment Data DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi 06/30/2021 07/01/2021 09/28/2021US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS 05/06/2020 05/27/2020 08/13/2020US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS 04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011US PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EPA 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 12/15/2021US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA 12/31/2018 08/14/2020 11/04/2020US TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act EPA 12/31/2016 06/17/2020 09/10/2020 TC6803037.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009 US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems EPA 07/19/2021 07/19/2021 10/12/2021US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017US PADS PCB Activity Database System EPA 11/19/2020 01/08/2021 03/22/2021US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 07/29/2021 08/24/2021 11/19/2021US RADINFO Radiation Information Database Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2019 07/01/2019 09/23/2019US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA 05/05/2021 05/18/2021 08/17/2021US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA 04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RMP Risk Management Plans Environmental Protection Agency 10/20/2021 11/05/2021 11/12/2021US BRS Biennial Reporting System EPA/NTIS 12/31/2019 09/15/2021 12/14/2021US PWS Public Water System Data EPA 12/17/2013 01/09/2014 10/15/2014US INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations USGS 12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines Department of Interior 09/14/2021 09/15/2021 12/15/2021CA CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services 01/01/1989 07/27/1994 08/02/1994CA CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Department of Toxic Substances Control 12/31/2019 01/20/2021 04/08/2021CA CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Office of Emergency Services 06/30/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CORTESE "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information 09/20/2021 09/21/2021 12/08/2021CA CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON CUPA Facility Listing Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department 05/01/2019 05/14/2019 07/17/2019CA DEED Deed Restriction Listing DTSC and SWRCB 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities Department of Toxic Substance Control 08/27/2021 09/01/2021 11/19/2021CA DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listi South Coast Air Quality Management District 08/18/2021 08/23/2021 11/12/2021CA DRYCLEAN AVAQMD Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner L Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Distri 08/24/2021 08/25/2021 11/17/2021CA EMI Emissions Inventory Data California Air Resources Board 12/31/2019 06/10/2021 08/27/2021CA ENF Enforcement Action Listing State Water Resoruces Control Board 04/16/2021 04/20/2021 07/07/2021CA Financial Assurance 1 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/14/2021 04/15/2021 07/06/2021CA Financial Assurance 2 Financial Assurance Information Listing California Integrated Waste Management Board 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 11/05/2021CA HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing Integrated Waste Management Board 09/14/2021 11/11/2021 11/23/2021CA HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List Department of Toxic Substances Control 04/01/2001 01/22/2009 04/08/2009CA HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 11/08/2021CA HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database Department of Toxic Substances Control 10/04/2021 10/05/2021 12/22/2021CA ICE ICE Department of Toxic Subsances Control 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 11/08/2021CA LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Qualilty Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA LIENS Environmental Liens Listing Department of Toxic Substances Control 08/25/2021 09/03/2021 11/22/2021CA MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA MINES Mines Site Location Listing Department of Conservation 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing Department of Public Health 08/05/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA NPDES NPDES Permits Listing State Water Resources Control Board 05/10/2021 05/11/2021 07/27/2021CA PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing Department of Pesticide Regulation 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA PROC Certified Processors Database Department of Conservation 06/04/2021 06/04/2021 08/27/2021CA NOTIFY 65 Proposition 65 Records State Water Resources Control Board 03/12/2021 03/16/2021 06/01/2021CA SCH School Property Evaluation Program Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/22/2021 07/22/2021 10/08/2021CA SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch FirstSearch 06/06/2012 01/03/2013 02/22/2013 TC6803037.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date CA TOXIC PITS Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites State Water Resources Control Board 07/01/1995 08/30/1995 09/26/1995 CA UIC UIC Listing Deaprtment of Conservation 06/03/2021 06/03/2021 08/25/2021CA WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing RWQCB, Central Valley Region 02/11/2021 07/01/2021 09/29/2021CA WDS Waste Discharge System State Water Resources Control Board 06/19/2007 06/20/2007 06/29/2007CA WIP Well Investigation Program Case List Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board 07/03/2009 07/21/2009 08/03/2009CA WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database State Water Resources Control Board 04/01/2000 04/10/2000 05/10/2000CA WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA PROD WATER PONDS Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA OTHER OIL GAS Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA NON-CASE INFO Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA UIC GEO Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resource Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA CERS CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data California Environmental Protection Agency 07/15/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA 08/13/2021 08/13/2021 10/22/2021CA WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/08/2021 12/01/2021CA SAMPLING POINT Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021CA PROJECT Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/06/2021 05/21/2021 08/11/2021CA CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System State Water Resources Control Board 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/08/2021 12/01/2021US FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/25/2021 06/24/2021 09/20/2021US MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System USGS 04/06/2018 10/21/2019 10/24/2019US UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites Department of Defense 12/31/2018 07/02/2020 09/17/2020CA HWTS Hazardous Waste Tracking System Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/13/2021 07/14/2021 10/06/2021CA CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks California Environmental Protection Agency 07/15/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE CalEPA 07/15/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing State Water Resources Control Board 12/01/2019 08/19/2021 10/28/2021CA MILITARY PRIV SITES Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) State Water Resources Control Board 09/07/2021 09/07/2021 11/29/2021US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 06/26/2021 07/01/2021 09/28/2021HISTORICAL USE RECORDSUS EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR, Inc.CA RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Resources Recycling and Recover 07/01/2013 01/13/2014CA RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan State Water Resources Control Board 07/01/2013 12/30/2013 TC6803037.2s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date
COUNTY RECORDS
CA CS ALAMEDA Contaminated Sites Alameda County Environmental Health Services 01/09/2019 01/11/2019 03/05/2019CA UST ALAMEDA Underground Tanks Alameda County Environmental Health Services 09/30/2021 10/01/2021 12/15/2021CA CUPA AMADOR CUPA Facility List Amador County Environmental Health 08/05/2021 08/06/2021 09/17/2021CA CUPA BUTTE CUPA Facility Listing Public Health Department 04/21/2017 04/25/2017 08/09/2017CA CUPA CALVERAS CUPA Facility Listing Calveras County Environmental Health 09/15/2021 09/16/2021 12/09/2021CA CUPA COLUSA CUPA Facility List Health & Human Services 04/06/2020 04/23/2020 07/10/2020CA SL CONTRA COSTA Site List Contra Costa Health Services Department 07/20/2021 07/20/2021 10/11/2021CA CUPA DEL NORTE CUPA Facility List Del Norte County Environmental Health Divisio 06/29/2021 07/23/2021 10/08/2021CA CUPA EL DORADO CUPA Facility List El Dorado County Environmental Management Dep 07/30/2021 08/03/2021 10/26/2021CA CUPA FRESNO CUPA Resources List Dept. of Community Health 04/09/2021 06/23/2021 09/17/2021CA CUPA GLENN CUPA Facility List Glenn County Air Pollution Control District 01/22/2018 01/24/2018 03/14/2018CA CUPA HUMBOLDT CUPA Facility List Humboldt County Environmental Health 08/12/2021 08/12/2021 11/08/2021CA CUPA IMPERIAL CUPA Facility List San Diego Border Field Office 07/13/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CUPA INYO CUPA Facility List Inyo County Environmental Health Services 04/02/2018 04/03/2018 06/14/2018CA CUPA KERN CUPA Facility List Kern County Public Health 07/06/2021 08/12/2021 10/07/2021CA UST KERN Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Environment Health Services Depar 07/06/2021 08/12/2021 08/18/2021CA CUPA KINGS CUPA Facility List Kings County Department of Public Health 12/03/2020 01/26/2021 04/14/2021CA CUPA LAKE CUPA Facility List Lake County Environmental Health 07/27/2021 07/28/2021 10/21/2021CA CUPA LASSEN CUPA Facility List Lassen County Environmental Health 07/31/2020 08/21/2020 11/09/2020CA AOCONCERN Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County 03/30/2009 03/31/2009 10/23/2009CA HMS LOS ANGELES HMS: Street Number List Department of Public Works 07/08/2021 07/09/2021 09/29/2021CA LF LOS ANGELES List of Solid Waste Facilities La County Department of Public Works 07/09/2021 07/09/2021 09/29/2021CA LF LOS ANGELES CITY City of Los Angeles Landfills Engineering & Construction Division 01/01/2021 02/18/2021 05/10/2021CA LOS ANGELES AST Active & Inactive AST Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 06/01/2019 06/25/2019 08/22/2019CA LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE Methane Producing Landfills Los Angeles County Department of Public Works 02/04/2021 04/16/2021 04/21/2021CA LOS ANGELES HM Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 04/19/2021 06/17/2021 06/28/2021CA LOS ANGELES UST Active & Inactive UST Inventory Los Angeles Fire Department 04/19/2021 06/17/2021 09/14/2021CA SITE MIT LOS ANGELES Site Mitigation List Community Health Services 05/26/2021 07/09/2021 09/29/2021CA UST EL SEGUNDO City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank City of El Segundo Fire Department 01/21/2017 04/19/2017 05/10/2017CA UST LONG BEACH City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank City of Long Beach Fire Department 04/22/2019 04/23/2019 06/27/2019CA UST TORRANCE City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank City of Torrance Fire Department 02/02/2021 04/28/2021 07/13/2021CA CUPA MADERA CUPA Facility List Madera County Environmental Health 08/10/2020 08/12/2020 10/23/2020CA UST MARIN Underground Storage Tank Sites Public Works Department Waste Management 09/26/2018 10/04/2018 11/02/2018CA UST MENDOCINO Mendocino County UST Database Department of Public Health 09/22/2021 11/18/2021 11/22/2021CA CUPA MERCED CUPA Facility List Merced County Environmental Health 08/11/2021 08/12/2021 11/08/2021CA CUPA MONO CUPA Facility List Mono County Health Department 02/22/2021 03/02/2021 05/19/2021CA CUPA MONTEREY CUPA Facility Listing Monterey County Health Department 06/23/2021 06/23/2021 06/24/2021CA LUST NAPA Sites With Reported Contamination Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 01/09/2017 01/11/2017 03/02/2017CA UST NAPA Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Napa County Department of Environmental Manag 09/05/2019 09/09/2019 10/31/2019CA CUPA NEVADA CUPA Facility List Community Development Agency 07/28/2021 07/28/2021 10/21/2021CA IND_SITE ORANGE List of Industrial Site Cleanups Health Care Agency 07/09/2021 08/03/2021 10/26/2021CA LUST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Health Care Agency 07/09/2021 08/03/2021 10/26/2021CA UST ORANGE List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Health Care Agency 07/09/2021 07/29/2021 10/19/2021CA MS PLACER Master List of Facilities Placer County Health and Human Services 09/07/2021 09/09/2021 11/29/2021CA CUPA PLUMAS CUPA Facility List Plumas County Environmental Health 03/31/2019 04/23/2019 06/26/2019 TC6803037.2s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date CA LUST RIVERSIDE Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Department of Environmental Health 09/29/2021 09/30/2021 12/14/2021 CA UST RIVERSIDE Underground Storage Tank Tank List Department of Environmental Health 09/29/2021 09/30/2021 12/15/2021CA CS SACRAMENTO Toxic Site Clean-Up List Sacramento County Environmental Management 06/18/2021 09/28/2021 12/14/2021CA ML SACRAMENTO Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Sacramento County Environmental Management 08/02/2021 08/04/2021 11/02/2021CA CUPA SAN BENITO CUPA Facility List San Benito County Environmental Health 07/27/2021 07/28/2021 10/21/2021CA PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO Hazardous Material Permits San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardo 08/11/2021 08/12/2021 11/08/2021CA HMMD SAN DIEGO Hazardous Materials Management Division Database Hazardous Materials Management Division 08/30/2021 08/31/2021 11/19/2021CA LF SAN DIEGO Solid Waste Facilities Department of Health Services 10/01/2020 11/23/2020 02/08/2021CA SAN DIEGO CO LOP Local Oversight Program Listing Department of Environmental Health 07/14/2020 07/16/2020 09/29/2020CA SAN DIEGO CO SAM Environmental Case Listing San Diego County Department of Environmental 03/23/2010 06/15/2010 07/09/2010CA CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO CUPA Facility Listing San Francisco County Department of Environmen 08/05/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA LUST SAN FRANCISCO Local Oversite Facilities Department Of Public Health San Francisco Cou 09/19/2008 09/19/2008 09/29/2008CA UST SAN FRANCISCO Underground Storage Tank Information Department of Public Health 08/05/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA UST SAN JOAQUIN San Joaquin Co. UST Environmental Health Department 06/22/2018 06/26/2018 07/11/2018CA CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO CUPA Facility List San Luis Obispo County Public Health Departme 08/10/2021 08/11/2021 11/08/2021CA BI SAN MATEO Business Inventory San Mateo County Environmental Health Service 02/20/2020 02/20/2020 04/24/2020CA LUST SAN MATEO Fuel Leak List San Mateo County Environmental Health Service 03/29/2019 03/29/2019 05/29/2019CA CUPA SANTA BARBARA CUPA Facility Listing Santa Barbara County Public Health Department 09/08/2011 09/09/2011 10/07/2011CA CUPA SANTA CLARA Cupa Facility List Department of Environmental Health 08/04/2021 08/05/2021 10/29/2021CA HIST LUST SANTA CLARA HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report Santa Clara Valley Water District 03/29/2005 03/30/2005 04/21/2005CA LUST SANTA CLARA LOP Listing Department of Environmental Health 03/03/2014 03/05/2014 03/18/2014CA SAN JOSE HAZMAT Hazardous Material Facilities City of San Jose Fire Department 11/03/2020 11/05/2020 01/26/2021CA CUPA SANTA CRUZ CUPA Facility List Santa Cruz County Environmental Health 01/21/2017 02/22/2017 05/23/2017CA CUPA SHASTA CUPA Facility List Shasta County Department of Resource Manageme 06/15/2017 06/19/2017 08/09/2017CA LUST SOLANO Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Solano County Department of Environmental Man 06/04/2019 06/06/2019 08/13/2019CA UST SOLANO Underground Storage Tanks Solano County Department of Environmental Man 09/15/2021 09/16/2021 12/09/2021CA CUPA SONOMA Cupa Facility List County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services De 07/02/2021 07/06/2021 07/14/2021CA LUST SONOMA Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Department of Health Services 06/30/2021 06/30/2021 09/24/2021CA CUPA STANISLAUS CUPA Facility List Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmenta 05/14/2021 05/17/2021 08/03/2021CA UST SUTTER Underground Storage Tanks Sutter County Environmental Health Services 08/23/2021 08/25/2021 11/17/2021CA CUPA TEHAMA CUPA Facility List Tehama County Department of Environmental Hea 01/13/2021 01/14/2021 04/06/2021CA CUPA TRINITY CUPA Facility List Department of Toxic Substances Control 07/14/2021 07/15/2021 10/06/2021CA CUPA TULARE CUPA Facility List Tulare County Environmental Health Services D 04/26/2021 04/28/2021 07/13/2021CA CUPA TUOLUMNE CUPA Facility List Divison of Environmental Health 04/23/2018 04/25/2018 06/25/2018CA BWT VENTURA Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Unde Ventura County Environmental Health Division 05/26/2021 07/19/2021 10/08/2021CA LF VENTURA Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Environmental Health Division 12/01/2011 12/01/2011 01/19/2012CA LUST VENTURA Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Environmental Health Division 05/29/2008 06/24/2008 07/31/2008CA MED WASTE VENTURA Medical Waste Program List Ventura County Resource Management Agency 05/26/2021 07/19/2021 10/07/2021CA UST VENTURA Underground Tank Closed Sites List Environmental Health Division 07/26/2021 09/08/2021 11/29/2021CA UST YOLO Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Yolo County Department of Health 09/23/2021 09/28/2021 12/15/2021CA CUPA YUBA CUPA Facility List Yuba County Environmental Health Department 07/20/2021 07/20/2021 10/08/2021 TC6803037.2s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6803037.2s Page GR−8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date F-1
Privileged and Confidential Attorney Work Product
Appendix F: User Questionnaire
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
USER QUESTIONNAIRE
Site/Project Name: Skelly
Location: 215 Skelly
In Order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs)1 offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”),2 the user must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete. Please explain your answers if appropriate.
1. Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site (40 CFR 312.25).
Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law?
Yes _____ No __X___
2. Activity and land use limitations (AULs) that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in a registry (40 CFR 312.26).
Are you aware of AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law? Yes _____ No __X___
3. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28).
As the user of this Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business?
1 Landowner Liability Protections, or LLPs, is the term used to describe the three types of potential defenses to Superfund liability in EPA’s Interim Guidance Regarding Criteria Landowners Must Meet in Order to Qualify for Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser, Contiguous Property Owner, or Innocent Landowner Limitations on CERCLA Liability (“Common Elements” Guide) issued on March 6, 2003.
2 P.L. 107-118.
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
USER QUESTIONNAIRE
Yes _____ No __X___
4. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29).
Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property?
Yes __X___ No _____
If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property?
Yes _____ No _____ NA _X____
5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30).
Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? Yes __X___ No _____
For example, as user,
(a) Do you know the past uses of the property? Yes __X___ No _____ (b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? Yes _____ No __X___
(c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? Yes _____ No __X___
(d) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? Yes _____ No __X___
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
USER QUESTIONNAIRE
6. The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation (40 CFR 312.31).
As the user of the ESA based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property?
Yes _____ No __X___
To enable Brown and Caldwell to complete your project, please also respond to the following items.
(a) The reason why the Phase I is required:
DR Horton is preparing develop the property for single-family housing. (b) The type of property (e.g., industrial, commercial, vacant, agricultural, residential, etc.) and type of property transaction, for example, sale, purchase, exchange, etc.:
Vacant Residential (with horse keeping)
(c) The complete and correct address for the property, including county (a map or other documentation showing property location and boundaries is helpful):
215 Skelly, Hercules, CA (ATLA survey provided via email) (d) The scope of services desired for the Phase I (including whether any parties to the property transaction may have a required standard scope of services or whether any considerations beyond the requirements of Practice E 1527 are to be considered):
Standard scope of services
(e) Identification of all parties who will rely on the Phase I report:
DR Horton & City of Hercules (public document to be evaluated and made available as part of the project’s CEQA review
(f) Identification of the site contact and how the contact can be reached:
Roberta Mori – 916-256-0557
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
USER QUESTIONNAIRE
(g) Any special terms and conditions which must be agreed upon by the environmental professional:
No
(h) Any other knowledge or experience with the property that may be pertinent to the environmental professional (for example, copies of any available prior environmental site assessment reports, documents, correspondence, etc., concerning the property and its environmental conditions. These include, but are not necessarily limited to:
- ESA reports,
- Environment compliance audit reports,
- Environmental permits (for example, solid waste disposal permits, hazardous waste disposal permits, wastewater permits, NPDES permits, underground injection permits),
- Registrations for underground and above-ground storage tanks, - Registrations for underground injection systems,
- Material safety data sheets,
- Community right-to-know plan,
- Safety plans; preparedness and prevention plans; spill prevention, countermeasure, and control plans; etc.,
- Reports regarding hydrogeologic conditions on the property or surrounding area,
- Notices or other correspondence from any government agency relating to past or current violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or relating to environmental liens encumbering the property,
- Hazardous waste generator notices or reports,
- Geotechnical studies,
- Risk assessments, and
- Recorded AULs.
No
(i) Proceedings Involving the Property – whether the User knows of:
(a) Any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; Yes _____ No __X___
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
USER QUESTIONNAIRE
(b) Any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property;
Yes _____ No __X___
(c) Any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products;
Yes _____ No __X___
Please explain any “Yes” answers below.
Completed by:
Signature
Printed Name Adam Foster
Organization DR Horton
Date 12/16/2021
Please return this questionnaire to:
Brian Sefcik
[email protected]
Brown and Caldwell
Fax – 615-256-8332
Phone – 615-238-2073
G-1
Privileged and Confidential Attorney Work Product
Appendix G: Qualifications of Environmental
Professionals
Staff Geologist/Hydrogeologist Kaitlin Tanel, GIT
1 Tanel, Kaitlin [9/11/2019)
Experience Summary
Ms. Tanel is a geologist/hydrogeologist at BC’s Davis office in the Site Investigation & Remediation - Solid Waste service line, providing support for both municipal and private sector clients. She has prepared technical workplans and implementation reports in addition to performing environmental sampling, soil logging, and XRF analysis.
Environmental Services
Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring and Reporting, Rasmussen Valley Mines, Caribou County, Idaho
Field Geologist/Hydrogeologist. Kaitlin uses various techniques to collect groundwater samples, maintain field forms, and provide quality assurance and field data entry. She participated in field activities and maintains and calibrates field equipment.
Folsom Corporation Yard, City of Folsom, California
Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. To support site closure of the City’s former landfill, BC is providing ongoing water quality monitoring. Kaitlin is assisting in the field sampling program and in creation of bi-annual water quality analysis and quarterly water level monitoring reports.
Site Remediation, Confidential Client, Sacramento, California Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. The purpose of this project is currently to investigate the source of chlorinated VOCs at site formerly used as an industrial laundry and an adjacent carton manufacturing facility. Work in this project included VOC source investigation and exposure pathway/risk evaluation. Kaitlin provides technical support for the project.
Waste Investigation, Confidential Client, Sacramento, California Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. BC is currently providing technical assistance for a historical illegal landfill site. The landfill materials were discovered during earthwork activities in preparation of the client building a new electrical substation. Kaitlin was a CQA personnel for the project and collected soil confirmation samples, oversaw stockpile management, and continued monitoring using the landfill gas monitoring network.
Waste Handling/Capping Consulting, Confidential Client, Sacramento, California
Project Geologist/Hydrogeologist. BC is providing technical expertise regarding waste handling and/or capping for historic landfill on property where client operates a substation. Kaitlin provides field support for the project. Currently BC is in negotiation with the Local Enforcement Agency to collect delay providing a closure/post closure maintenance plan for a proposed landfill cap. The current substation is scheduled to be decommissioned in approximately four years, and BC is supporting the clients’ efforts to mitigate any interim risks (landfill gas, groundwater) until the substation is decommissioned and the underlying landfill can be capped.
BC is preparing the interim action plan that is intended to bridge the four-year gap. Kaitlin provides continued monitoring using the landfill gas monitoring network.
Assignment
Staff Geologist/Hydrogeologist
Education
B.S., Geology, University of the
Pacific, Stockton, 2016
Registration
Geologist in Training, California,
2017
Training
40-hour HAZWOPER
8-hour Refresher
HAZWOPER Supervisor
24-hour MSHA
H2S competence
First Aid
CPR/AED
SmithSystem Defensive Driving
PASSPORT
Experience
3 years
Joined Firm
2018
Relevant Expertise
• Environmental sampling
• Soil logging
• Geologic mapping
• XRF analysis
• Construction quality assurance
Kaitlin Tanel, GIT.
2 Tanel, Kaitlin [9/11/2019)
Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Confidential Client, Vallecitos, California Site Safety Officer. BC is assisting the client fulfill the provision of a Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) permit issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. The work will include developing a groundwater monitoring plan and re-engineering the site’s wastewater treatment system to meet nitrate limits. Kaitlin acted as a Site Safety Officer.
Site Investigation and Remedial Activities, Confidential Client, Kern County, California Junior Scientist. The purpose of this project was to investigate and remediate soil contamination related to oil well drilling and pumping. Kaitlin provided technical assistance in site investigations and was a field team lead during select sampling efforts. Investigation activities included boring logs, soil sample collection, and XRF analysis of metals. Contaminants of potential concern at the site include metals, polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic hydrocarbons (VOCs). Additionally, Kaitlin authored relevant sampling plans, Removal Action Work Plans, and Implementation Reports. [Performed while at Ahtna Facility Services, Inc. in 2016-2018] Geologist I Brian D. Sefcik
1 Sefcik Brian_10.30.19.docx 10/30/2019
Experience Summary
Brian Sefcik is a geologist with over 5 years of experience ranging from field activities, state and federal compliance reporting, writing documents that report on findings in field activities, and sample collecting. His experience in the environmental field includes inspecting oil and gas wells and site in correlation with federal and state regulations, working with federal agencies for remediation of contamination, and writing environmental inspections for public view. Mr. Sefcik’s experience also include various field activities for field sampling and soil testing.
Project Experience
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, DR Horton, Nationwide Staff Geologist. Completing Phase I ESAs by following all appropriate inquiries (AAI). Responsibilities include project coordination, technical report writing, historical and physical setting research, review of prior assessments, and regulatory database analysis and reporting. [2019 - Present] Previous Experience
Patriot Engineering and Environmental, Inc, Goodlettsville, Tennessee Construction Material Technician. Collected concrete samples for compressive strength testing, soils inspections, reinforcing steel inspections, and soil and concrete testing. [2018 – 2019]
Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio
Mineral Resource Inspector II. Inspect oil and gas well in Ohio for compliance with federal and stare regulations. Work with any Federal Agency (EPS and Wildlife) when the need arose to ensure compliance of wells. Remediate any spills with federal and state regulations and ensure all contamination was eliminated. Authoring, reviewing, and editing clear, concise, well-organized, and legally defensible documents that are readily understood for the public. [2015 – 2018]
Horizon Well Logging LLC, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Logging Geologist II. Collected, cleaned, and analyzed cutting samples from drilling process. Use of Main Log software in order to collect data and develop subsurface models with lithological descriptions of sedimentary rocks. Had familiarity of porosity types in sedimentary rocks and, picked formation tops with lithologic knowledge. [2014- 2015]
Assignment
Due Diligence
Education
B.S., Geology, Marietta College,
Ohio, 2014
Registration
OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety
and Health Training
First Aid and CPR Certified
Experience
5 years
Joined Firm
2019
Relevant Expertise
• Soil Sampling
• Oil and gas well compliance
inspections
Senior Manager, Client Services John Nash
1 Nash, John [04/10/2017] 5/30/2017
Experience Summary
Mr. Nash has over 22 years of experience as an environmental professional including experience managing large, multi-task programs and hands-on field experience on hazardous waste cost-reimbursable and fixedprice projects involving site characterization. He is very knowledgeable of federal, state, and appropriate local laws and regulations. Mr. Nash's program management experience has encompassed the full range of environmental compliance and permitting, due diligence, site assessment, remediation services, and construction quality assurance. He has been responsible and accountable for contracts valued in excess of $50 million, including single programs greater than $20 million.
In the past 5 years, Mr. Nash has been responsible for over $30 million in active projects. These project sites have included locations in all 50 states and involved site work at various military installations. He has managed turnkey projects ranging from $2,000 to $20 million. On these contracts, Mr. Nash served as the single point of responsibility, authority, and accountability with clients, holding scheduled status meetings, participating in partnering sessions, implementing all contractual commitments and policies, and taking immediate corrective actions when necessary. He has also conducted Department of Transportation (DOT) training programs to familiarize staff with the hazardous material shipping programs.
Mr. Nash has prepared estimates, proposals, and plans; supervised field work; implemented safety and quality control programs; and tracked and controlled costs and schedule for both commercial and federal clientele.
Project Experience
Construction Environmental Health & Safety Compliance Audits, Confidential Commercial Client
Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, budget, and quality for retail client requiring construction audits at 500 retail facilities nationwide. The audit included examination of health and safety, stormwater pollution prevention, hazardous waste management, and employee verification practices conducted by the client’s general contractor during remodel activities. Able to coordinate site visits with other on-site activities to save the client cost.
Annual Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) Tier II Reporting, Norfolk Southern Corporation Project Manager. Managed and improved the data gather process, threshold determination, and report preparation and submittal process for annual EPCRA submittals.
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Project Manager. Prepared and managed the process of preparing and updating multiple SPCC plans in both Georgia and Nevada. These incorporated both administrative and technical changes at the sites.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Plans, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation
Project Manager. Managed the process of updating multiple SWPP plans in both Georgia and Nevada.
Health and Safety Assessments, Dollar Tree
Client Service Manager. Managed a multi-year program involving the assessment of basic health and safety elements at the retail store level. The assessments were conducted nationwide over a two-year period.
Education
B.S., Geology, University of South
Florida, 1994
Experience
22 years
Joined Firm
2016
Additional Training
OSHA 40-hour HAZWOPER 29
CFR 1910.120, 1995
OSHA 8-hour Supervisor
Training for Hazardous Waste
site, 1996
US Army Corp – Certified
Construction Quality
Management for Contractors,
2003
Large Account Management
Process by Miller Heiman,
2006
First Aid/CPR/AED Certification
DOT General Awareness DOT
49 CFR 172.704(a)(1)
John Nash
2 Nash, Joh [4/10/2017] 5/30/2017
Annual EPCRA Tier II Reporting, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Manager of EPCRA Section 311 and 312 Hazardous Chemical Inventory reporting for Fortune 100 client with over 4,500 locations nationwide. Documented and improved the data gathering process, threshold determination, and report preparation and submittal process for the annual EPCRA submittals.
Waste Segregation and Environmental Auditing, Walgreens, California Client Service Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget involving the investigation and segregation of hazardous waste found in waste receptacles at over 600 retail stores and logistics facilities. This program spanned a 5-year period, with multiple audits per site, and included the development of a specific e-reporting tool used for gathering field data, capable of being communicated quickly to the client.
Annual EPCRA Tier II Reporting, Lowe’s Companies
Client Service Manager. Managed and improved the data gather process, threshold determination, and report preparation and submittal process for the annual EPCRA submittals.
Waste Segregation, Lowe’s Companies, California
Client Service Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for project involving the annual auditing of waste receptacles for the presence of hazardous waste at retail stores in California. Audits were conducted at either the transfer stations or the client sites.
Environmental Site Assessments in the Southeastern United States, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and CB Richard Ellis
Project Manager. Managed local site assessors in the completion of Phase I activities including site visits, searches for historical aerial photographs, ownership records, deed searches, and regulatory review, which included the review of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) reports.
Hazardous Materials Shipping Support Services, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for a confidential commercial client. Visited over 4,000 facilities to assist employees in verifying that products going to a centralized return center to meet DOT requirements were packaged according to their classification (hazardous vs. non-hazardous). Responsibilities included on-site education and review of proper shipping instructions with facility representatives, and evaluation of on-site hazardous waste programs against company defined programs with real-time corrections of deviations.
Asset Investigation and Reconciliation Project, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for a confidential commercial client. Tasks included identifying potential owned/operated water sources, including wells, surface water intakes, or other third party provided water located at facilities nationwide, with a specific focus on the confirmation of the water wells previously identified.
Environmental Asset Inventory for Operating Facilities, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for a confidential commercial client as it applied to the inventory of environmental assets that had or may have had potential environmental ramifications such as regulatory obligations, the potential to cause environmental releases to the soil, water or air, or the need for routine maintenance or servicing provided by Environmental Services.
Environmental Permitting Review, Confidential Commercial Client Store Planning Group Project Manager. Assisted in managing scope, schedule, and budget for confidential commercial client as it applied to environmental permit review and SPCC plans. The environmental permit review applied to aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), pressure vessels, waste management, wastewater discharge, stormwater discharge, air quality/air emissions. These permit reviews focused on changes caused by the remodeling of existing facilities.
Dye-trace Testing of Plumbing, Confidential Commercial Client Project Manager. Managed scope, schedule, and budget for the construction quality assurance of plumbing installation. Managed the oversight of plumbing contractors conducting dye-trace testing of drain lines to John Nash
3 Nash, Joh [4/10/2017] 5/30/2017
ensure that the construction specifications were being met and that wastewater permit limits could be met by the facility.
Horse Pasture Site Remediation, Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment (AFCEE), Robins Air Force Base, Georgia
Project Manager. Responsible for the financial success of this performance-based contract totaling $8.6 million, as it applied to the scope, schedule, and budget. Site soils contaminated with heavy metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and pesticides were remediated and removed from the site. Returned site groundwater impacted by VOCs (including dense non-aqueous phase liquids [DNAPLs]) to levels below remedial limits and obtained a No Further Action from Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
Interim Measure (IM), AFCEE, Charleston Air Force Base, South Carolina Deputy Project Manager. Managed the implementation of an IM, which involved the installation of a geosynthetic landfill cover. Duties included management of scope, schedule, personnel, and subcontractors; subcontractor procurement; client interface; and fieldwork implementation.
RCRA Facility Investigations and Corrective Measure Studies, Multiple Project Sites, AFCEE, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and Patrick Air Force Base, Florida Project Manager. Duties included management of scope, schedule, budget, and personnel; proposal preparation; subcontractor procurement; client and regulator interface; fieldwork participation and implementation; groundwater modeling; and report completion. Work activities were completed at active and inactive launch complexes and fuel storage areas. All work activities were monitored and evaluated closely by the Canaveral Air Force Station/Patrick Air Force Base Environmental Restoration Partnering Team (Partnering Team), which consisted of representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the United States Air Force and various contractors.
St. John’s Water Management District, Lake Apopka North Shore Restoration Area, Florida Field Operations Lead. Conducted soil and sediment sampling across 10,000 acres of former farmland. Global Positioning System units were utilized to locate and survey sampling points with sub-meter accuracy. All field activities were monitored and evaluated closely by the St. Johns River Water Management District, USEPA, FDEP, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
Environmental Services, Naval Training Center (NTC), Orlando, Florida Scientist. Performed and developed tank closure assessments and reports, contamination assessment reports, initial remedial actions, and tank management plans for ASTs and USTs at multiple NTC Orlando sites.
The contamination assessment reports addressed petroleum soil, free product, and groundwater contamination. A focused remedial investigation/feasibility study was developed to be implemented as an interim action at a base dry cleaning facility. Project focused on dissolved phase DNAPL contamination in the subsurface migrating into a surface water body. Responsibilities included: planning and implementing a focused remedial investigation and pumping test; acting as field operations lead for the investigation and test; and developing a focused feasibility study.
Phase I/II ESAs, Multiple Clients
Scientist. Conducted Phase I/II ESAs for multiple clients. Phase I activities included site visits, searches for historical aerial photographs, ownership records, deed searches, and regulatory review. Preparation of the Phase I ESA reports included detailed recommendations for Phase II investigation.
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
Noise Supporting Information
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1 Project Number: 2118.0006 Sheet 1 of 2
Project Name: Skelly Residential
Test Personnel: Jennifer Vitanza
Noise Measurement Survey
Site Number: LT 1 Date: 03/16/2022 Time: From To
Site Location: Skelly Residential project in Hercules, CA, southeast portion of project site, approximately 50-feet from the edge of railline
Primary Noise Sources:Primary noise sources were the train, also noise was from activity at the senior center facility across the road on the south end of the property was audible.
Measurement Results Observed Noise Sources/Events
Time Noise Source/Event dBA
Comments: Day of the measurment, the weather was very mild with a wind factor of 5MPH coming from the northeast. Sunny, no clouds. The day I picked up the noise meter on the 17th, it had rained lighty for half an hour at 10am, then went away quickly, still sunny with some clouds and the wind had picked up to 8MPH.
Equipment: Larson Davis LXT Measured Difference: .05
dBA
Settings: A-Weighted Other Slow Fast Windscreen
Atmospheric Conditions:
Maximum Wind
Velocity (mph)
Average Wind
Velocity (mph) Temperature (F)
Relative
Humidity (%)
8 5 64 48
Comments:
dBA
Leq 57.5
Lmax 95.4
Lmin 33.8
Lpeak
L5
L10
L50
L90
SEL
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.198.s
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0004397
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.301
User
Location
Job Description
Note
Measurement
Description
Start 2022‐03‐16 23:06:57
Stop 2022‐03‐17 23:14:48
Duration 24:07:51.0
Run Time 24:07:51.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre‐Calibration 2022‐03‐16 23:05:01
Post‐Calibration None
Calibration Deviation ‐‐‐
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight A Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamplifier PRMLxT2B
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
Overload 140.9 dB
A CZ
Under Range Peak 97.1 94.1 99.1 dB
Under Range Limit 35.5 33.5 41.5 dB
Noise Floor 23.1 23.5 30.8 dB
First Second Third
Instrument Identification FCS1 Fresno
Results
LAeq 57.5
LAE 106.9
EA 5.404 mPa²h
EA8 1.791 mPa²h
EA40 8.957 mPa²h
LApeak (max) 109.4 dB
LASmax 95.4 dB
LASmin 33.8 dB
SEA ‐99.9 dB
Exceedance Counts
LAS > 85.0 dB 10 34.4 s
LAS > 115.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 135.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 137.0 dB 0 0.0 s
LApeak > 140.0 dB 0 0.0 s
Community Noise Ldn LDay 07:00‐22:00 LNight 22:00‐07:00 Lden LDay 07:00‐19:00 LEvening 19:00‐22:00 LNight 22:00‐07:00
60.6 59.0 52.4 61.5 58.8 59.7 52.4
LCeq 68.0 dB
LAeq 57.5 dB
LCeq ‐ LAeq 10.5 dB
LAIeq 60.9 dB
LAeq 57.5 dB
LAIeq ‐ LAeq 3.4 dB
dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp dB Time Stamp Leq 57.5 68.0
LS(max) 95.4
LS(min) 33.8
LPeak(max) 109.4
Overload Count 0
Overload Duration 0.0 s
Dose Settings
Dose Name OSHA‐1 OSHA‐2
Exchange Rate 5 5 dB
Threshold 90 80 dB
Criterion Level 90 90 dB
Criterion Duration 8 8h
Results
Dose 0.01 0.15 %
Projected Dose 0.00 0.05 %
TWA (Projected) 18.4 35.3 dB
TWA (t) 26.3 43.2 dB
Lep (t) 62.3 62.3 dB
Statistics
LA 5.00 52.1 dB
LA 10.00 50.2 dB
LA 33.30 46.8 dB
LA 50.00 45.2 dB
LA 66.60 43.6 dB
LA 90.00 40.2 dB
Duration
A CZ
LxT_0004397‐20220303 230657‐LxT_Data.198.ldbin
TABLE Existing-01
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 290 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 44.95 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Existing-02
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6000 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.03 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 91.3
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Existing-03
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21200 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.17 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
58.1 116.4 246.4 528.8
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Existing plus Project-01
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing plus Project
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 570 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 47.88 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Existing plus Project-02
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing plus Project
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6400 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.31 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 95.2
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Existing plus Project-03
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Existing plus Project
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21400 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.21 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
58.4 117.1 248.0 532.1
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Cumulative-01
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 330 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 45.51 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Cumulative-02
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7000 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.70 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 100.8
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Cumulative-03
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative
______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 24500 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.80 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
63.0 127.7 271.2 582.3
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Cumulative plus Project-01
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Skelly - South of Hercules Avenue
NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative plus Project ______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 710 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 48.83 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Cumulative plus Project-02
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: Hercules Avenue - Skelly to San Pablo Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative plus Project ______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7400 SPEED (MPH): 25 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 18 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 57.94 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
0.0 0.0 0.0 104.5
______________________________________________________________________
TABLE Cumulative plus Project-03
FHWA ROADWAY NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS
RUN DATE: 03/25/2022
ROADWAY SEGMENT: San Pablo Avenue - west of Hercules Avenue NOTES: 215 Skelly Residential - Cumulative plus Project ______________________________________________________________________ * * ASSUMPTIONS * *
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 24700 SPEED (MPH): 45 GRADE: .5
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES
DAY NIGHT
--- -----
AUTOS
88.08 9.34
M-TRUCKS
1.65 0.19
H-TRUCKS
0.66 0.08
ACTIVE HALF-WIDTH (FT): 24 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: SOFT
______________________________________________________________________ * * CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS * *
Ldn AT 50 FT FROM NEAR TRAVEL LANE CENTERLINE (dB) = 68.84 DISTANCE (FEET) FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINE TO Ldn
70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn
------- ------- ------- -------
63.3 128.3 272.6 585.4
______________________________________________________________________ U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2130-0017
Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings: For public highway-rail grade crossings, complete the entire inventory Form. For private highway-rail grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings (including pedestrian station grade crossings), complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For Private pathway grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings (including pedestrian station crossings), complete the Header, Part I, and the Submission Information section. For changes to existing data, complete the Header, Part I Items 1-3, and the Submission Information section, in addition to the updated data fields. Note: For private crossings only, Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K. are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk * denotes an optional field.
A. Revision Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)
_____/_____/_________
B. Reporting Agency C. Reason for Update (Select only one) D. DOT Crossing Railroad Transit Change in Inventory Number
Data
New
Crossing
Closed No Train
Traffic
Quiet
Zone Update
State Other Re-Open Date
Change Only
Change in Primary
Operating RR
Admin.
Correction
Part I: Location and Classification Information
1. Primary Operating Railroad
_____________________________________________________
2. State
________________________________
3. County
____________________________________
4. City / Municipality
In
Near __________________________
5. Street/Road Name & Block Number
________________________________| __________________
(Street/Road Name) |* (Block Number)
6. Highway Type & No.
_______________________________________
7. Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing? Yes No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________
8. Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? Yes No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________
9. Railroad Division or Region
None _______________________
10. Railroad Subdivision or District
None _______________________
11. Branch or Line Name
None _______________________
12. RR Milepost
_______|____________|____________
(prefix) | (nnnn.nnn) | (suffix)
13. Line Segment
*
_________________________
14. Nearest RR Timetable
Station *
__________________________
15. Parent RR (if applicable)
N/A _____________________________
16. Crossing Owner (if applicable)
N/A _________________________________
17. Crossing Type
Public
Private
18. Crossing Purpose
Highway
Pathway, Ped.
Station, Ped.
19. Crossing Position
At Grade
RR Under
RR Over
20. Public Access
(if Private Crossing)
Yes
No
21. Type of Train
Freight
Intercity Passenger
Commuter
Transit
Shared Use Transit
Tourist/Other
22. Average Passenger
Train Count Per Day
Less Than One Per Day
Number Per Day_____
23. Type of Land Use
Open Space Farm Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Recreational RR Yard
24. Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? Yes No If Yes, Provide Crossing Number __________________
25. Quiet Zone (FRA provided)
No 24 Hr Partial Chicago Excused Date Established _________________
26. HSR Corridor ID
__________________ N/A
27. Latitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn)
28. Longitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)
29. Lat/Long Source
Actual Estimated
30.A. Railroad Use * 31.A. State Use *
30.B. Railroad Use * 31.B. State Use *
30.C. Railroad Use * 31.C. State Use *
30.D. Railroad Use * 31.D. State Use *
32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) * 32.B. Narrative (State Use) *
33. Emergency Notification Telephone No. (posted)
_________________________________
34. Railroad Contact (Telephone No.)
______________________________________
35. State Contact (Telephone No.)
_________________________________
Part II: Railroad Information
1. Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements
1.A. Total Day Thru Trains
(6 AM to 6 PM)
__________
1.B. Total Night Thru Trains
(6 PM to 6 AM)
__________
1.C. Total Switching Trains
__________
1.D. Total Transit Trains
__________
1.E. Check if Less Than
One Movement Per Day
How many trains per week? ______
2. Year of Train Count Data (YYYY)
__________
3. Speed of Train at Crossing
3.A. Maximum Timetable Speed (mph) __________
3.B. Typical Speed Range Over Crossing (mph) From __________ to __________
4. Type and Count of Tracks
Main __________ Siding __________ Yard __________ Transit __________ Industry __________
5. Train Detection (Main Track only)
Constant Warning Time Motion Detection AFO PTC DC Other None
6. Is Track Signaled?
Yes No
7.A. Event Recorder
Yes No
7.B. Remote Health Monitoring
Yes No
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 1 OF 2 ✘ ✘
11 07 2019
029824K
BNSF Railway Company [BNSF] CALIFORNIA CONTRA COSTA PINOLE ✘ SAN PABLO RD CA 40 ✘ ✘ CALIFORNIA STOCKTON CALWA-RICHMOND 1181.270 7200 PINOLE ✘ BNSF ✘ ✘
✘
✘
0 ✘
✘ ✘
✘
38.0082731 -122.286590
✘
( I.27 I.28 I.29)Value Provided by Railroad, Not Yet Reported by State 800-832-5452 817-352-1549 415-703-3722 6 6 0 0 1 ✘
45 2019 1 45 1 0 0 0 0
✘
✘
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 2 OF 2 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
A. Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) PAGE 2 D. Crossing Inventory Number (7 char.) Part III: Highway or Pathway Traffic Control Device Information
1. Are there
Signs or Signals?
Yes No
2. Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing
2.A. Crossbuck
Assemblies (count)
2.B. STOP Signs (R1-1)
(count)
2.C. YIELD Signs (R1-2)
(count)
2.D. Advance Warning Signs (Check all that apply; include count) None W10-1 ________ W10-3 ________ W10-11 __________
W10-2 ________ W10-4 ________ W10-12 __________
2.E. Low Ground Clearance Sign
(W10-5)
Yes (count_______)
No
2.F. Pavement Markings 2.G. Channelization
Devices/Medians
2.H. EXEMPT Sign
(R15-3)
Yes
No
2.I. ENS Sign (I-13)
Displayed
Yes
No
Stop Lines
RR Xing Symbols
Dynamic Envelope
None
All Approaches
One Approach
Median
None
2.J. Other MUTCD Signs Yes No 2.K. Private Crossing Signs (if private)
Yes No
2.L. LED Enhanced Signs (List types)
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Count __________
Count __________
Count __________
3. Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing (specify count of each device for all that apply)
3.A. Gate Arms
(count)
Roadway _____
Pedestrian _____
3.B. Gate Configuration 3.C. Cantilevered (or Bridged) Flashing Light Structures (count)
3.D. Mast Mounted Flashing Lights
(count of masts) _________
3.E. Total Count of
Flashing Light Pairs
2 Quad
3 Quad
4 Quad
Full (Barrier)
Resistance
Median Gates
Over Traffic Lane _____
Not Over Traffic Lane _____
Incandescent
LED
Incandescent
Back Lights Included
LED
Side Lights
Included
3.F. Installation Date of Current
Active Warning Devices: (MM/YYYY)
______/___________ Not Required
3.G. Wayside Horn 3.H. Highway Traffic Signals Controlling Crossing
Yes No
3.I. Bells
(count) Yes
No
Installed on (MM/YYYY) ______/__________
3.J. Non-Train Active Warning
Flagging/Flagman Manually Operated Signals Watchman Floodlighting None
3.K. Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices
Count ___________ Specify type ______________________
4.A. Does nearby Hwy
Intersection have
Traffic Signals?
Yes No
4.B. Hwy Traffic Signal
Interconnection
Not Interconnected
For Traffic Signals
For Warning Signs
4.C. Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5. Highway Traffic Pre-Signals Yes No
6. Highway Monitoring Devices
(Check all that apply)
Yes - Photo/Video Recording
Yes – Vehicle Presence Detection
None
Simultaneous
Advance
Storage Distance * ____________
Stop Line Distance * ____________
Part IV: Physical Characteristics
1. Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad One-way Traffic
Two-way Traffic
Number of Lanes _______ Divided Traffic
2. Is Roadway/Pathway
Paved?
Yes No
3. Does Track Run Down a Street?
Yes No
4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street
lights within approx. 50 feet from
nearest rail) Yes No
5. Crossing Surface (on Main Track, multiple types allowed) Installation Date * (MM/YYYY) _______/__________ Width * ______________ Length * _______________ 1 Timber 2 Asphalt 3 Asphalt and Timber 4 Concrete 5 Concrete and Rubber 6 Rubber 7 Metal 8 Unconsolidated 9 Composite 10 Other (specify) ________________________________________________________
6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet?
Yes No If Yes, Approximate Distance (feet) _________________
7. Smallest Crossing Angle
0° – 29° 30° – 59° 60° - 90°
8. Is Commercial Power Available? *
Yes No
Part V: Public Highway Information
1. Highway System
(01) Interstate Highway System
(02) Other Nat Hwy System (NHS)
(03) Federal AID, Not NHS
(08) Non-Federal Aid
2. Functional Classification of Road at Crossing
(0) Rural (1) Urban
(1) Interstate (5) Major Collector
(2) Other Freeways and Expressways
(3) Other Principal Arterial (6) Minor Collector
(4) Minor Arterial (7) Local
3. Is Crossing on State Highway
System?
Yes No
4. Highway Speed Limit
___________ MPH
Posted Statutory
5. Linear Referencing System (LRS Route ID) *
6. LRS Milepost *
7. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Year _______ AADT _____________
8. Estimated Percent Trucks
___________________ %
9. Regularly Used by School Buses?
Yes No Average Number per Day ___________
10. Emergency Services Route
Yes No
Submission Information - This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website.
Submitted by __________________________________ Organization _______________________________________ Phone _______________ Date _____________ Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection, including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, MS-25 Washington, DC 20590.
11/07/2019 029824K ✘
0 0
✘
✘
0 0
0 0
0 ✘
0 0
✘ ✘
1970 ✘ 0
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
Public Services Supporting Information
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
UNITED STATES
T +1 888 826 5814
T +1 714 508 4100
F +1 714 508 4110
E [email protected]
Irvine
250 Commerce
Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92602
Bay Area
1350 Treat Boulevard
Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Central Valley
7265 N. First Street
Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93720
Inland Empire
650 E. Hospitality Lane
Suite 125
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Sacramento Valley
2204 Plaza Drive
Suite 210
Rocklin, CA 95765
Utah
2901 Bluegrass Boulevard
Suite 200-44
Lehi, UT 84043
Connecticut
2 Corporate Drive
Suite 450
Shelton, CT 06484
New York
10 Monument Street
Deposit, NY 13754
56 Broome Corporate Parkway
Conklin, NY 13748
CANADA
UNITED KINGDOM
PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA
AUSTRALIA
PHILIPPINES
CHINA
MALAYSIA
SINGAPORE
Request Letter
North America | Europe | Africa | Australia | Asia www.firstcarbonsolutions.com
REQUEST LETTER
February 24, 2022
Darren Johnson, Acting Fire Chief
Rodeo-Hercules Fire District
1680 Refugio Valley Road
Hercules, CA 94547
Subject: Skelly Residential Project IS/MND: Fire Protection Services Dear Fire Chief Johnson:
FirstCarbon Solutions is preparing an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), as required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), to evaluate the environmental impacts of a proposed development within the City of Hercules. As part of the environmental review process, we are consulting with public service providers to determine whether the project would impact their ability to deliver services. We are contacting you to request information related to provision of fire and emergency services in Hercules.
As shown in Attachment A, the 7.3-acre project site is located at 215 Skelly on Accessor’s Parcel Number [APN] No. 404-020-012. The site currently contains a single-family residence, 58 horse paddocks, a permitted 2,400 square foot storage building, miscellaneous outbuildings, and a large metal clad shed that appear to be abandoned relics of the site’s previous use as a farm. According to the City of Hercules General Plan Land Use and the Hercules Zoning Map, the site is zoned Residential Single-Family Low Density (RS-L).
The project applicant is proposing the development of a residential subdivision consisting of 40 single-family residence lots on the 7.3-acre project site. Development of the proposed project would involve the removal of the existing trees, vegetation, and existing structures currently on the project site. The proposed project would divide the project site into eight separate parcels (Parcels A-G) and 40 single-family residential lots. The residential lots would range from 3,836 square-feet to 6,887 square-feet (Attachment B).
Potential impacts to public services are an important element of our analysis. Our analysis strongly relies on your assistance in identifying potentially significant impacts to fire protection services that may occur as a result of the project, as well as any mitigation measure(s) that may reduce or eliminate these impacts. Any assistance that you can provide with addressing the following questions would be greatly appreciated.
UNITED STATES
T +1 888 826 5814
T +1 714 508 4100
F +1 714 508 4110
E [email protected]
Irvine
250 Commerce
Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92602
Bay Area
1350 Treat Boulevard
Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Central Valley
7726 N. First Street
#413
Fresno, CA 93720
Inland Empire
967 Kendall Drive
#A-537
San Bernardino, CA 92407
Sacramento Valley
2351 Sunset Boulevard
Suite 170-301
Rocklin, CA 95765
Utah
2901 Bluegrass Boulevard
Suite 200-62
Lehi, UT 84043
Connecticut
2 Corporate Drive
Suite 450
Shelton, CT 06484
New York
10 Monument Street
Deposit, NY 13754
56 Broome Corporate Parkway
Conklin, NY 13748
CANADA
UNITED KINGDOM
PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA
AUSTRALIA
PHILIPPINES
CHINA
MALAYSIA
SINGAPORE
ii
Request Letter
Service Questions
1. Which station(s) would provide services to the project site?
2. What are the existing staffing levels, by type (department-wide and at the station(s) that would serve the project site)? What is the current number of firefighters, EMT personnel, engines, hook and ladder trucks, etc.?
3. Please provide the current average response times for emergency calls for service as a whole and for the station(s) located nearest to the project site.
4. Please provide an estimate of the annual number of service calls the proposed project would be expected to generate. If possible, please provide an estimate by type of call (e.g., EMS, fire, etc.)
5. What is the ability of the fire department to accommodate the demand of the proposed project as part of the existing facilities?
6. Are there any existing or planned mutual aid agreements with other agencies?
7. Please provide information about the residential and non-residential development fee schedule. What are the current rates? What is the estimate rate for the proposed project?
Thank you for your assistance in responding to these questions. Your responses will help us ensure that our analysis is accurate and complete. To ensure a timely completion of our analysis, please provide your response via e-mail no later than Friday, March 11th, 2022. If you have any questions or need additional time to respond, please contact me by e-mail at [email protected]
8. Do you foresee any potential challenges that the project may present to the department? This includes concerns related to response times, staffing, apparatus, fire stations, etc. Please describe any measures that you would recommend to reduce potential concerns/challenges.
9. Would the development of the proposed project impair the fire department’s ability to maintain established response time standards with current staff and equipment levels?
10. Would the fire department need to construct new facilities or expand existing ones in order to serve the proposed project and the fire protection needs of the surrounding community?
11. Do you have any other comments about the potential impacts of this project on the fire department? Please provide any recommendations or special concerns that may assist us in avoiding or reducing the occurrence of potential impacts to fire services associated with the project.
UNITED STATES
T +1 888 826 5814
T +1 714 508 4100
F +1 714 508 4110
E [email protected]
Irvine
250 Commerce
Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92602
Bay Area
1350 Treat Boulevard
Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Central Valley
7726 N. First Street
#413
Fresno, CA 93720
Inland Empire
967 Kendall Drive
#A-537
San Bernardino, CA 92407
Sacramento Valley
2351 Sunset Boulevard
Suite 170-301
Rocklin, CA 95765
Utah
2901 Bluegrass Boulevard
Suite 200-62
Lehi, UT 84043
Connecticut
2 Corporate Drive
Suite 450
Shelton, CT 06484
New York
10 Monument Street
Deposit, NY 13754
56 Broome Corporate Parkway
Conklin, NY 13748
CANADA
UNITED KINGDOM
PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA
AUSTRALIA
PHILIPPINES
CHINA
MALAYSIA
SINGAPORE
iii
Request Letter
Sincerely,
Madelyn Dolan, Environmental Services Assistant Project Manager FirstCarbon Solutions
1350 Treat Blvd. Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Enc: Attachment A: Local Vicinity Map
Attachment B: Site Plan
Attachment A:
Local Vicinity Map
21180006 • 12/2021 | 2_local_vicinity.mxd
Local Vicinity Map
Source: bing Aerial Imagery. County of Contra Costa Parcel Data.
CITY OF HERCULES
SKELLY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1,000 500 0 1,000
Feet
Legend
Project Site
City Limits
City of Hercules
City of Pinole
Attachment B:
Site Plan
I
21180006 • 12/2021 | 4_site_plan.cdr
Site Plan
CITY OF HERCULES
SKELLY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Source: CBG Civil Engineers, November 2021.
HERCULES POLICE DEPARTMENT
111 Civic Drive • Hercules, CA 94547
Main: (510) 799-8260
Fax: (510) 799-8281
Dispatch: (510) 724-1111
Website: www.ci.hercules.ca.us
William T. Imboden
Chief of Police
1. Which station(s) would provide services to the project site? Hercules PD only has one station for the entire City.
2. Please describe the existing staffing levelsthat would serve the projectsite. Please include a description of number of officers, civilian personnel, active patrols at one time, etc.
At any given time there are the following personnel on the street: 1 Sergeant, 3 Police Officers, 1 Parking Enforcement Officer. Dispatch services are by contract through Pinole PD. Animal Control is by contract through the County.
3. Please provide the current average response times for emergency calls for service as a whole and for the station(s) located nearest to the project site.
“…for emergency calls” is a fairly broad spectrum. Our average response time for all crime reports is 3 minutes 3 seconds. Shorter for in-progress crimes, longer for cold reports.
4. Would the development of the proposed project impair the police department’s ability to maintain established response time standards with current staff and equipment levels? No.
5. Please provide an estimate of the officers/1,000 residents and the target ratio that the department would like to achieve.
We are slightly below the 1/1,000 ratio the City Council tries to maintain. We have 27 sworn positions and a population closer to 28,000.
6. List any existing or planned mutual aid agreements with other agencies.
We have a written County-Wide mutual aid agreement with every agency in the County which covers incidents large and small. We have unwritten mutual aid understandings with Pinole PD to cover each other on more regular calls.
7. Please provide an estimate of the annual number of calls for service the proposed project would be expected to generate.
150 – 200 based on the build-out population increase of 200 residents.
8. What are the current rates of the residential development fees? What is the estimated rate for the proposed project?
I don’t have an answer for this question. Community Development would be better suited.
9. Do you foresee any potential challenges that the proposed project may present to the department? (Including concerns related to response times, staffing, apparatus, stations, etc.) Please describe any measures you would recommend to reduce potential concerns/challenges.
The area is isolated from the view of surrounding neighborhoods, with easy foot and bicycle access from the creek area on the border of town, popular with homeless people. In a critical incident response there will be avenues of escape my Officers won’t be able to get to easily or quickly. With only one avenue of approach for vehicular traffic creating a funnel effect there is the potential for a bottleneck during a large scale response, or natural disaster, even with the EVA.
10. Would the department need to construct new facilities or expand existing ones in order to serve the proposed project and the law enforcement needs of the City? This project by itself does not create such a need, but in combination with others in progress creating the need for increased staffing, yes, our existing facility is not large enough to accommodate us.
11. Do you have any other comments about the potential impacts of this project on the police department? Please provide any recommendations or special concerns that may assist us in avoiding or reducing the occurrence of potential impacts to police services associated with the project.
No additional comments. Thank you for taking the time to ask for our input.
William T. Imboden
Chief Of Police
From: Silvia Garfield
To: Maddie Dolan
Cc: Melissa Payne
Subject: Fwd: 2118.0006 Skelly Residential Project School Services Letter Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:44:51 AM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Hello Maddie,
Below is the information you requested.
Thank you,
Silvia
Silvia Garfield
Senior Administrative Assistant
Office of the Associate Superintendent
Operations
Phone 510-231-1105
[email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ellen Mejia Hooper <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: 2118.0006 Skelly Residential Project School Services Letter To: Silvia Garfield <[email protected]>
Cc: Melissa Payne <[email protected]>
Hi Silvia
I think Melissa responded to #5 but here are the remainder of the answers.
Please identify the current enrollment and capacity of the District as a whole. Please also identify the District’s area of enrollment.
· District enrollment area can be seen on the map at this website (http://apps.schoolsitelocator.com/index.html?districtCode=32073). It includes the cities of El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Pinole, Hercules, and unincorporated areas of the county.
Because this area is so large, there are varying conditions across the District · Current (2021/22) K-12 enrollment using CBEDS data is 25,992 students · Current K-12 capacity District-wide is 29,492 seats
2. Please provide the current standard student generation factors used by the District. · Current standard is from our residential housing study
3. Please list the school(s) that may be affected by the proposed project and their current capacity/enrollment ratio.
· Ohlone Elementary School – 102% utilization
· Hercules Middle School – 111% utilization
· Hercules High School – 73% utilization
4. Please identify the ability to accommodate the schools demand of the proposed project as part of the existing facilities.
This area's elementary and middle schools are currently over-enrolled, so accommodating these additional students within the existing facilities without modifications or other adjustments would be challenging.
The high school does have the capacity to accommodate the additional students.
5. Please provide information about the residential and non-residential development fee
*EFFECTIVE 08/24/2020 LEVEL 1 RATE INCREASE TO $4.08*
*Effective 06/01/2020 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL RATE INCREASE TO $0.66* Additions to existing residences under 500 square feet – No Fee Mini Storage Fee - $0.09 per square foot
Additions to existing residences 500 sq. ft. and above - $4.08 per square foot (on the entire additional square footage)*
New Residential Construction - $4.08 per square foot*
Commercial / Industrial / Exclusive Senior Housing - $0.66 per square foot *
6. Please define any potential challenges that the proposed project may present to the District. Please describe any measures that you would recommend to reduce potential concerns/challenges.
The District is embarking on a student housing study to address the need to balance our enrollment and align it with the space available; however, the geographic features, transportation systems, and student resident locations make such balancing difficult.
The Hercules area is impacted at the elementary and middle school levels and is isolated from the remainder of the district. To accommodate student enrollment, additional capacity may need to be added to Ohlone Elementary and Hercules Middle.
Another measure could include adjusting attendance boundaries. ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Maddie Dolan <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 8:57 AM
Subject: 2118.0006 Skelly Residential Project School Services Letter To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Tsui Li <[email protected]>, Robert Reber <[email protected]> Hello,
Attached is a letter pertaining to the proposed Skelly Residential project located in the City of Hercules. The letter provides a basic project description and asks a few questions about your department’s ability to service the new development. If you could please review the letter and attached site plan to provide responses by Friday, March 11, your input would greatly assist us in the completion of our environmental analysis. If you have questions, please reach out at any time.
Thank you,
Madelyn Dolan (she | her | hers)
Environmental Services, Assistant Project Manager
Mobile +1 925 451 7133
FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS)
An ADEC Innovation
LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter
--
Ellen Mejia Hooper
Director of Facilities Planning and Construction
O: 510-307-4544 C: 510-778-6473
Follow Us on Facebook and Instagram @WCCUSDfacilities
1400 Marina Way S
Richmond, CA 94804
City of Hercules–Skelly Residential Project
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
Transportation Analysis
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Report
215 Skelly Residential Development
February 28, 2022
City of Hercules, California
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Page | i
Contents
Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ 1
1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Study Purpose ...........................................................................................................................................................................4
1.2 Study Intersections..................................................................................................................................................................4
1.3 Study Scenarios.........................................................................................................................................................................4
2.0 Study Methodology................................................................................................................................. 8
2.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled ...........................................................................................................................................................8
2.2 Level of Service Analysis Methodology...........................................................................................................................8
2.3 Level of Service Standards..................................................................................................................................................10
3.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.1 Existing Setting and Roadway System...........................................................................................................................12
3.2 Existing Pedestrian Facilities ..............................................................................................................................................12
3.3 Existing Bicycle Facilities......................................................................................................................................................15
3.4 Existing Transit Facilities......................................................................................................................................................17
3.5 Existing Traffic Conditions ..................................................................................................................................................19
3.6 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions.................................................................................21
4.0 Existing plus Project Conditions .......................................................................................................... 23
4.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled .........................................................................................................................................................23
4.2 Project Trip Generation........................................................................................................................................................23
4.3 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ...................................................................................................................24
4.5 Intersection Queuing Analysis ..........................................................................................................................................26
5.0 Cumulative No-Project Conditions (2040).......................................................................................... 29
5.1 Intersections Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative No-Project Conditions ................................................29
6.0 Cumulative plus Project Conditions .................................................................................................... 31
6.1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions ................................................31
7.0 Additional Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 33
7.1 Site Access ................................................................................................................................................................................33
9.2 On-Site Circulation................................................................................................................................................................34
9.3 Parking........................................................................................................................................................................................34 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Page | ii
9.4 Recommendations.................................................................................................................................................................35 Tables
Table 1: Signalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions................................................................................................9 Table 2: Unsignalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions........................................................................................ 10 Table 3: Existing Bus Services ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions........................................................................... 21 Table 5: Year 2020 VMT Generation .......................................................................................................................................... 23 Table 6: Project Trip Generation.................................................................................................................................................. 24 Table 7: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions.................................................. 26 Table 8. 95th Percentile Queue Lengths at Selected Turn Lanes:.................................................................................... 27 Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 27 Table 12: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative Conditions ................................................................. 29 Table 13: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions ........................................ 31 Figures
Figure 1: Vicinity Map.........................................................................................................................................................................6 Figure 2: Site Plan.................................................................................................................................................................................7 Figure 3: Existing Pedestrian Facilities....................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4: Existing Bicycle Facilities .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 5: Existing Transit Facilities .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 6: Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls ...................................................................................................... 20 Figure 7: Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................. 22 Figure 8: Project Trip Distribution and Assignment............................................................................................................. 25 Figure 9: Existing plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................................................................ 28 Figure 10: Cumulative No-Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................ 30 Figure 11: Cumulative plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 32 Appendices
Appendix A – Existing Turning Movement Counts
Appendix B – Existing Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Page | iii
Appendix C - CCTA TAZ Boundaries
Appendix D – Existing plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E – Cumulative Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix F – Cumulative plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the results of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) conducted for the proposed residential development located at 215 Skelly in the City of Hercules. The project would replace a former horse ranch with 40 single family homes.
The purpose of this report is to provide summaries of changes in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and traffic impacts on the surrounding transportation system with the proposed project. The VMT analysis is based on the methodology adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). To evaluate the effects on the transportation infrastructure due to the addition of traffic from the proposed project, an LOS analysis was conducted to determine consistency with City of Hercules and CCTA plans and standards.
Vehicle Miles Traveled
In the project vicinity, the CCTA Travel Demand Model generates daily residential VMT per resident of 14.7 for 2020, well below the countywide average of 19.78. Based on the CCTA VMT screening threshold of
16.81 this is considered a low-VMT area, and there is no substantial evidence that the project would generate high VMTs for this location. The project is expected to cause a less-than-significant impact under CEQA and is exempt from further VMT analysis.
Project Trip Generation
TJKM developed estimated project trip generation for the proposed project based on published trip generation rates from the ITE publication Trip Generation (11 th Edition). TJKM used published trip rates for
the ITE land use Single Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210) for this project. The proposed project is expected to generate 377 total daily trips, including 28 net new a.m. peak hour trips (7 in, 21 out) and 38 net new p.m. peak hour trips (24 in, 14 out).
Existing Conditions
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during the a.m. peak hour, and both intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour.
Existing plus Project Conditions
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during a.m. peak hour, and both study intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 2
Cumulative Conditions
The Cumulative No-Project Conditions analysis forecasts how the study area’s transportation system would operate with the full build-out of the project in combination with the growth and changes of the surrounding community by the year 2040.
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour.
Cumulative plus Project Conditions
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour, and deteriorate to LOS C during the p.m. peak hour with an increase in delay of 2.2 seconds. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour, and deteriorate to LOS D during the p.m. peak hour with an increased delay of 0.9 seconds. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.
Site Access and On-Site Circulation
TJKM concluded that the site plan will operate acceptably and provide adequate on-site vehicle circulation and access to parking spaces. The proposed project does not conflict with existing and planned pedestrian or bicycle facilities and will add trips to existing transit facilities, which can be accommodated by the existing transit capacity. Site access and circulation for vehicles are considered adequate, but on-site pedestrian circulation could be improved with additional curb ramps.
Parking
The project would require 80 off-street parking spaces for the 40 dwelling units. The proposed project would construct two-car garages with driveway aprons for each dwelling unit, providing 80 covered spaces satisfying City requirements, as well as 80 uncovered spaces. The proposed parking supply would therefore be more than adequate under City of Hercules requirements and would not produce any parking impacts on surrounding parcels or roadways.
Queuing Analysis
Queuing operations were analyzed at the one signalized intersection with dedicated left- and right-turn lanes, under Existing and Cumulative Conditions, with and without the proposed project. Under Existing Conditions, the signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would experience queue overflows in the eastbound left turn lane during PM peak hours, and overflows in the southbound left turn lane during one or both peak hours. Under Existing plus Project Conditions, the same turn lanes would continue to experience overflows during the same peak hours, with mild increases in queue lengths in the southbound left turn lane during the AM peak hours and a 20ft increase in queue lengths in the 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 3
eastbound left turn lane during PM peak hours. The addition of project trips would not cause any new queue overflows.
Recommendations
TJKM recommends the following:
The grading plans for the site should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the finished grade and landscaping do not create any visual obstructions for vehicles exiting the driveways. Add curb ramps to provide accessible throughout the development. 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 4
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the results of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) conducted for the proposed residential development located at 215 Skelly in the City of Hercules. The proposed project would replace a former horse ranch with 40 single family homes. Primary access to the project site would be provided by a private street connecting to Skelly at the location of the existing driveway. This chapter discusses the TIS purpose, project study area, and analysis scenarios. Figure 1 shows the study area and project site location. Figure 2 shows the project site plan, dated November, 2021.
1.1 STUDY PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to provide summaries of changes in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and traffic impacts on the surrounding transportation system. The VMT analysis is based on the methodology adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). To evaluate the effects on the transportation infrastructure due to the addition of traffic from the proposed project, an LOS analysis was conducted to determine consistency with City of Hercules and CCTA plans and standards.
1.2 STUDY INTERSECTIONS
TJKM evaluated traffic conditions at two study through remote field review.
The study intersections were selected based on TJKM’s working knowledge of the area with input and approval from the City of Hercules. San Pablo Avenue is identified as a Route of Regional Significance within the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) West County Action Plan. Due to ongoing traffic irregularities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, observed traffic volumes were increased by an adjustment factor to estimate typical traffic volumes. This is discussed further in section 3.5.
The peak periods observed were between 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 4:00-6:00 p.m. The study intersections and associated traffic controls are as follows:
1. Hercules Avenue and Skelly/Zeus (Two-Way Stop)
2. Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue (Signalized)
1.3 STUDY SCENARIOS
The roadway operations analysis addresses the following four traffic scenarios:
Existing Conditions – This scenario evaluates the study intersections based on adjusted existing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic controls.
Existing plus Project Conditions – This scenario is identical to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed project.
Cumulative Conditions (2040) – This scenario considers the development of the city and surrounding communities to the year 2040, projecting existing traffic volumes to the year 2040 using an annual growth factor of 0.27 percent per year. This growth factor was derived from 2016 and 2040 traffic volumes contained in The Veranda Shopping Center TIS (2016, Kittelson & Associates), and ultimately based on the 2040 CCTA traffic model.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 5
Cumulative plus Project Conditions – This scenario is identical to Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed project.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 6
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 7
Figure 2: Site Plan
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 8
2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY
Traffic impacts related to the proposed project were evaluated for both compliance with applicable regulatory documents and environmental significance as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The CEQA analysis was conducted in accordance with the Technical Advisory On Evaluating Transportation Impacts In CEQA published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the July 1, 2020, Technical Memorandum prepared by Fehr & Peers describing the VMT methodology adopted by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA). As of July 1, 2020, intersection level of service (LOS) can no longer be used to determine significant CEQA impacts. However, an LOS analysis was conducted to determine consistency with City of Hercules and CCTA plans and standards.
2.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
This study evaluates project-related VMT as outlined in the adopted CCTA VMT methodology. The methodology and implementation guidelines were adopted by CCTA in July 2020. The City of Hercules has adopted CCTA VMT procedures and standards.
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory (December 2018) provides guidance to analysts and local jurisdictions for implementing VMT as a metric for determining the transportation impact for land use projects. The OPR guidelines state that for analysis purposes, “VMT” refers to automobile VMT, specifically passenger vehicles and light trucks. Heavy truck traffic is typically excluded.
The CCTA guidelines include a screening process that describes five scenarios in which a project would be with exempted from a VMT analysis requirement: 1) projects exempt from CEQA analysis, 2) small projects, 3) local serving projects, 4) projects in transit priority areas, and 5) projects in low VMT areas.
Using the CCTA methodologies, it appears that the proposed residential project will meet the exemption requirements for a low-VMT area. It should be noted that even if a project satisfies one or more of the screening criteria, lead agencies may still require a VMT analysis if there is evidence that the project has characteristics that might lead to a significant amount of VMT.
The following language is from the Project Screening section of the CCTA VMT methodologies and was applied to the proposed project:
2.5: Projects Located in Low VMT Areas. Residential and employment-generating projects located within a low VMT-generating area can be presumed to have a less-than-significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. A low VMT area is defined as follows:
For housing projects: Cities and unincorporated portions within CCTA’s five subregions that have existing home-based VMT per capita that is 85% or less of the existing County-wide average.
2.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
Although Level of Service (LOS) is no longer relevant to CEQA, LOS can be used to determine conformity with an adopted general plan or congestion management program. LOS is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions as they relate to the traffic stream and perceptions by motorists and 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 9
passengers. The LOS generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, delays, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. The operational LOS are given letter designations from A to F, with A representing the best operating conditions (freeflow) and F the worst (severely congested flow with high delays). Intersections generally are the capacitycontrolling locations with respect to traffic operations on arterial and collector streets in urban areas.
Signalized Intersections
The study intersection under traffic signal control was analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual 6 th
(HCM) Operations Methodology for signalized intersections described in Chapter 18. This methodology determines LOS based on average control delay per vehicle for the overall intersection during peak hour intersection operating conditions. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections was calculated using Synchro 10 analysis software and was correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table
1. Table 1: Signalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions Level of Service Description
Average
Control
Delay
A
Signal progression is extremely favorable. Most vehicles arrive during the green phase and do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to the very low vehicle delay.
10.0 or less
B
Operations characterized by good signal progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average vehicle delay.
10.1 to 20.0
C
Higher delays may result from fair signal progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though may still pass through the intersection without stopping.
20.1 to 35.0
D
The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable signal progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
35.1 to 55.0
E
This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor signal progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Individual cycle failures occur frequently.
55.1 to 80.0
F
This level of delay is considered unacceptable by most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major-contributing causes of such delay levels. greater than
80.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6
th Ed., Chapter 18 (Transportation Research Board, 2010) Average Control Delay per Vehicle in seconds
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 10
Unsignalized Intersections
The study intersection under stop control (unsignalized) was analyzed using the HCM Operations Methodology (HCM 6th Ed.) for unsignalized intersections described in Chapter 20. LOS ratings for stopsign controlled intersections are based on the average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At the side street, one-way or two-way stop controlled intersections, the control delay is calculated for each movement, not for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. The weighted average delay for the entire intersections is presented for all-way stop controlled intersections. The average control delay for unsignalized intersections was calculated using Synchro 10 analysis software and was correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Unsignalized Intersection Delay and LOS Definitions Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6
th Edition, Chapter 20 (Transportation Research Board, 2010) Average Control Delay per Vehicle in seconds
2.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Although level of service is no longer used for identifying impacts under CEQA, level of service analysis is still used for determining consistency with adopted agency plans and standards. Where standards refer to significant environmental impacts, this analysis instead identifies these as significant inconsistencies with adopted plans.
City of Hercules
The City of Hercules General Plan has established performance benchmarks for signalized intersections and roadway segments within its jurisdiction. The City’s policy is to maintain LOS D as the desired level of service on intersections along all Basic Routes, which includes all arterials, collectors, and local roads that are not Regional Routes. One exception to this standard is the City’s policy that Collector Roads operating worse than LOS D are not considered deficient if the intersection does not meet a Caltrans signal warrant.
This avoids over-signalizing intersections with low side-street volumes.
There is no specified criteria for determining significant impacts to unsignalized intersections. For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that an unsignalized intersection experiences a significant inconsistency if the LOS falls below LOS D, and the intersection meets the MUTCD Peak Hour Signal Warrant during the same peak hour.
Level of Service Description Average Control Delay
A Little or no traffic delay ≤10
B Short Traffic delays >10 – 15
C Average traffic delays >15 – 25
D Long traffic delays >25 – 35
E Very long traffic delays >35 – 50
F Extreme traffic delays >50
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 11
Contra Costa Transportation Authority CMP Intersections In the project vicinity, San Pablo Avenue is designated as a Route of Regional Significance (RORS). The intersection of San Pablo Avenue and Hercules Avenue is part of the CCTA Congestion Management Program (CMP) and subject to regular monitoring and separate LOS standards. The Congestion Management Program specifies level of service standards for intersections and RORS, but it does not provide specific thresholds of significance.
The LOS Standard for the San Pablo Avenue and Hercules Avenue is LOS E. The project-generated increase in traffic is considered to have a significant inconsistency with the CMP if an intersection meets either of the following criteria:
If intersection operations degrade from an acceptable level (LOS E or better) to an unacceptable level (LOS F).
For transportation facilities that fail to meet LOS standards (as defined above) under no project conditions, an increase in the volume/capacity ratio by 0.03 or greater above no project conditions is considered to be significant.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 12
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section describes existing conditions in the immediate project site vicinity, including roadway facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and available transit service. In addition, existing traffic volumes and operations are presented for the study intersections, including the results of LOS calculations.
3.1 EXISTING SETTING AND ROADWAY SYSTEM
Relevant roadways adjacent to the project site are discussed below:
Interstate 80 (I-80) From the Alameda County line to the Solano County line. I-80 is the primary interregional commute corridor through West County, and has major regional significance to the Bay Area. I-80 is an eight- to twelve-lane freeway with a posted speed limit of 65 miles per hour (mph). The north-south freeway connects Hercules with nearby cities, such as Richmond and Vallejo, and regional destinations, such as San Francisco and Sacramento. It also provides access to the greater freeway network with direct connections to Interstate 580, Interstate 680, Interstate 780, State Route 4, State Route 29, and State Route 37.
San Pablo Avenue. From the Alameda County line to I-80/Pomona Street in Crockett. San Pablo Avenue is the most important corridor for inter-city travel in West County: it is the primary transit spine of the region, it travels through all of the West County cities (in many cases, functioning as “Main Street”), and it is the primary reliever route to I-80 during periods of severe freeway congestion. San Pablo is a four-lane major arterial that runs generally east-west in the immediate project vicinity with a posted speed limit of 25-40 mph. On-street parking is prohibited, and intermittent sidewalks are provided along particular sections of the corridor. This roadway is also designated as a Route of Regional Significance by the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority (CCTA). Routes of Regional Significance are the most important streets in the County as designated by CCTA.
Skelly is a two-lane, east-west to north-south meandering street with a posted speed of 25 mph, which changes designation at Hercules Avenue. North of Hercules Avenue, Skelly becomes “Zeus,” a local street that provides access to the Olympic Hills HOA. South of Hercules Avenue, Skelly is a local street. On-street parking is permitted south of Hercules Avenue.
Hercules Avenue is a four-lane, generally north-south collector with a posted speed of 25 mph. Hercules Avenue extends from O’Neill Circle in the north to Village Parkway in the south. Sidewalks are provided on both sides, and on-street parking is generally permitted north of San Pablo Avenue.
3.2 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Walkability is defined as the ability to travel easily and safely between various origins and destinations without having to rely on automobiles or other motorized travel. The ideal “walkable” community includes wide sidewalks, a mix of land uses such as residential, employment, and shopping opportunities, a limited number of conflict points with vehicle traffic, and easy access to transit facilities and services. 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 13
Pedestrian facilities consist of crosswalks, sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and off-street paths, which provide safe and convenient routes for pedestrians to access the destinations such as institutions, businesses, public transportation, and recreation facilities.
In the project vicinity, the study intersection which is signalized is equipped with pedestrian signal heads and cross walks. A crosswalk is present on the southeast leg of the unsignalized intersection along Hercules Avenue at the crossing of Skelly. There are continuous sidewalks present on Hercules Avenue and Skelly. Sidewalks are present in most sections, but not continuous, on portions of San Pablo Avenue.
There is a gap in the sidewalk on the both sides San Pablo Avenue between the eastbound pedestrian pathway outlet south of the project site and the westbound pedestrian pathway outlet which terminates near Charles Avenue on San Pablo Avenue. The existing asphalt concrete pathways along the south side of the project site function as sidewalks along much of their length but may include sloping sections that reduce accessibility. Most nearby bus stops are accessible from the project site via existing sidewalks and crosswalks within the vicinity of the project site. The existing pedestrian facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 3.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 14
Figure 3: Existing Pedestrian Facilities
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 15
3.3 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
Bicycle paths, lanes and routes are typical examples of bicycle transportation facilities, which are defined by Caltrans as being in one of the following three classes:
1. Class I Multiuse Trail – a completely separated facility designed for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with crossing points minimized.
2. Class II Bike Lane –a designated lane for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and cross-flows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.
3. Class III Bike Route –a route designated by signs or pavement markings and shared with pedestrians and motorists.
4. Class IV Separated Bikeway – an on-street facility reserved for use by bicyclists, with physical separation between the bikeway and travel lanes. Physical separation consists of vertical elements that may include curbs, landscaping, bollards, or parking lanes.
There are existing Class II bike lanes provided on San Pablo Avenue east of Hercules Avenue; an extension of the Class II bike lane is proposed in the Hercules 2018 General Plan Circulation Element. A multi-use trail is present along Pinole Creek to the west of the project site. The existing and proposed bicycle facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 4.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 16
Figure 4: Existing Bicycle Facilities
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 17
3.4 EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES
Existing transit service to the project is provided by the Western Contra Costa Transit Authority (WestCAT) and the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART). Such services are described below. It should be noted that the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in substantially decreased transit demand throughout the region, leading to reduced service hours and frequency across multiple transit agencies. It is expected that service hours and frequency will be expanded when transit demand returns to more typical levels.
WestCAT – WestCAT provides bus service to various communities in West Contra Costa County including Hercules. It operates local, express, and regional bus lines as well as the Lynx transbay service. In the immediate vicinity of the proposed project, Bus Routes #J, #JPX, #C3, and #19, provide service to the project site and vicinity. Table 3 summarizes existing bus service in the project vicinity.
BART - BART provides passenger service within the metropolitan Bay Area. BART currently has five main operating lines: Antioch-SFO/Millbrae, Dublin/Pleasanton-Daly City, Berryessa/North San Jose-Richmond, Berryessa/North San Jose-Daly City, and Richmond-Millbrae There are also connectors to Oakland International Airport (OAK) and San Francisco International Airport (SFO). BART operates between 5:00 a.m. and 9:00 on weekdays and between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on weekends. During the a.m. and p.m. peak commute periods, train service runs at 15-minute intervals to each destination. The closest BART station is located in El Cerrito del Norte on the east side of San Pablo Avenue near County Center.
The existing transit facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 5.
Table 3: Existing Bus Services
Route
#
From To
Weekdays Weekend
Operating
Hours
Headway
(minutes)
Operating
Hours
Headway
(minutes)
J
Hercules
Transit Center El Cerrito BART 4:24 a.m. –11:33 p.m.
36 7:10 a.m. –
9:15 p.m. 45
JPX Hercules
Transit Center El Cerrito BART 5:14 am. –8:46 p.m.
26 … …
C3 Hercules
Transit Center
Contra Costa
College
7:06 a.m. –
8:01 p.m.
20 … …
19 Hercules
Transit Center Hilltop Mall … …
8:59 a.m. –
9:00 p.m. 13
Source: WestCAT website https://www.westcat.org/home/SchedSysMap accessed February 8, 2022 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 18
Figure 5: Existing Transit Facilities
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 19
3.5 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
TJKM evaluated existing traffic conditions at two study intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours on a typical weekday. Intersection turning movement counts of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians were collected during weekday a.m. peak period (7:00-9:00 a.m.) and p.m. peak period (4:00-6:00 p.m.) on January 13, 2022.
Due to ongoing traffic irregularities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, historical counts at one intersection were used as a basis of adjusting new turning movement volumes to estimated typical volumes. The adjusted volumes were then used as the basis for analyzing Existing Conditions. The most recent historical counts in the study area were collected in 2016 at Hercules & San Pablo Avenue, as part of the DEIR for the 2018 update to the Circulation Element of the Hercules General Plan. For the a.m. peak hour, 2022 volumes were increased by 24.8 percent to match total volumes in 2016. For the p.m. peak hour, 2020 volumes were increased by 42.7 percent.
The traffic count data are included in Appendix A. The existing lane geometries and traffic control at each study intersection are illustrated on Figure 6 and intersection turning movement volumes at each study intersection are illustrated on Figure 7.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 20
Figure 6: Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 21
3.6 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING CONDITIONS This scenario evaluates the study intersections based on existing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic controls, as described above. The peak hour factors calculated from the existing turning movement counts were used for the study intersections for the Existing Conditions analysis. The results of the LOS analysis using the HCM 6
th Edition methodology and Synchro 10 software program for Existing Conditions are summarized in Table 4. Field verification of existing intersections, lane configurations, and traffic controls were also conducted remotely and provided the basis for the LOS analysis for Existing Conditions.
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during the a.m. peak hour, and both study intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue & San Pablo Avenue operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The unsignalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly/Zeus operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour. It should be noted that at this intersection, the southbound approach on Zeus experiences higher delay than the northbound approach on Skelly during both peak hours. The northbound approach experiences 9.6 seconds of delay in both peak hours. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control Peak Hour
Existing Conditions
Average Delay¹ LOS²
1 Hercules Ave & Skelly/Zeus Two-Way
Stop Control
AM 12.4 B (SB)
PM 13.4 B (SB)
2 Hercules Ave & San Pablo Avenue Signal AM 24.1 C
PM 25.0 C
Notes:
AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour
1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.
2. LOS = Level of Service
* CMP intersections with LOS E threshold
Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 22
Figure 7: Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 23
4.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This analysis scenario presents the impacts of the proposed project at the study intersections and surrounding roadway system. This scenario is identical to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed project. The project would replace an existing horse ranch property with 40 single family homes.
4.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
As noted in section 2.1, the proposed project was evaluated using screening criteria adopted by CCTA, based on existing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) generated in the project area. For projects in areas with a similar mix of existing uses, residential projects are screened out if the home-based VMT per resident is at least 15 percent below the countywide average.
It should be noted that the CCTA travel demand model year 2020 is a simulation, based on data collected prior to the most recent decennial model update in 2016. The 2020 simulated baseline traffic conditions are therefore unaffected by actual pandemic-related traffic disruptions that occurred in 2020.
VMT Generated Per resident
The proposed project would construct 40 new single family homes on a site surrounded by similar lowdensity single family residential developments. The CCTA travel demand model generates simulated daily weekday VMT per capita by traffic analysis zone (TAZ) within Contra Costa County and throughout the Bay Area, for commute VMT per employee and residential VMT per capita. The project site is within the boundaries of an existing TAZ (#10236) that contains similar single family residential subdivisions under existing conditions. As shown in Table 5, the residential VMT per capita generated in this TAZ is 14.45. A map showing TAZ boundaries is included in Appendix C.
For the year 2020, the countywide residential VMT per capita generated by the CCTA travel demand model is 19.78. The corresponding threshold to consider a location to have low VMT, 15 percent below the countywide average, is 16.81. There is no apparent evidence that the project would generate more VMT than the surrounding area. Based on the CCTA screening criteria, the proposed project is expected to cause a less-than-significant impact under CEQA and is exempt from further VMT analysis.
Table 5: Year 2020 VMT Generation
TAZ # Description Population
Total Residential
VMT
Residential VMT
per Capita
10236
North of San Pablo Ave., between Hercules
Ave and Pinole Creek
1,036 8,288 14.45
Notes:
Source: CCTA travel demand model, baseline year 2020, Kittelson & Associates (2016)
4.2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
TJKM developed estimated project trip generation for the proposed project based on published trip generation rates from the ITE publication Trip Generation (11 th Edition). TJKM used published trip rates for
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 24
the ITE land use Single Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210) for this project. The proposed project is expected to generate 377 total daily trips, including 28 net new a.m. peak hour trips (7 in, 21 out) and 38 net new p.m. peak hour trips (24 in, 14 out).
Table 6 shows the trips expected to be generated by the proposed project.
Table 6: Project Trip Generation
Land Use2 Size2
Daily AM Peak PM Peak
Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Proposed Uses
Single-Family Detached
Housing (210) 40 DU 9.43 377 0.70 26:74 7 21 28 0.94 63:37 24 14 38 Total 337 7 21 28 24 14 38
Notes:
1. Trip Generation, 11
th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 2017
2. DU: dwelling unit
4.3 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Trip distribution is a process that determines in what proportion vehicles would be expected to travel between the project site and various destinations outside the project study area. Assignment determines the various routes that vehicles would take from the project site to each destination using the calculated trip distribution. Trip distribution assumptions for the proposed development project were developed based on the existing travel patterns and TJKM’s knowledge of the study area. The distribution assumptions for the proposed project are as follows:
It should be noted that, the distribution of those trips is approximate. The distribution assumptions applied to the existing use are as follows:
60 percent to/from San Pablo Avenue West, to Richmond Parkway 40 percent to/from San Pablo Avenue East, to I-80 and SR-4 Figure 8 illustrates the trip distribution and trip assignment at the study intersections. The project trips were then added to traffic volumes under Existing Conditions to generate Existing plus Project Conditions traffic volumes.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 25
Figure 8: Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 26
4.4 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions The intersection LOS analysis results for Existing plus Project Conditions are summarized in Table 6.
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during the a.m. peak hour, and both study intersections operate acceptably in the p.m. peak hour. The two-way stop-controlled intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly/Zeus operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour with an increased delay of 0.8 seconds, and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour with an increased delay of 1.8 seconds. It should be noted that at this intersection, the southbound approach on Zeus would continue to experience higher delay than the northbound approach on Skelly during both peak hours. The northbound approach would experience 9.8 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour, an increase of 0.2 seconds, and 9.5 seconds of delay in the p.m. peak hour, a decrease of 0.1 seconds. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C with an increased delay of 0.6 seconds during both peak hours. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.
Figure 9 shows projected turning movement volumes at both of the study intersections for Existing plus Project Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix D.
Table 7: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control
Peak
Hour
Existing
Conditions
Existing plus
Project Conditions
Average
Delay¹ LOS² Average Delay¹ LOS² Change in Delay3
1 Hercules Ave & Skelly/Zeus Two-Way
Stop Control
AM 12.4 B 13.2 B (SB) 0.8
PM 13.4 B 15.2 C (SB) 1.8
2 Hercules Ave & San Pablo
Avenue Signal AM 24.1 C 24.7 C 0.6
PM 25.0 C 25.6 C 0.6
Notes: AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour, Weekend – Saturday noon peak hour, Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. Red indicates significant impact.
1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.
2. LOS = Level of Service
3. Change in average delay between Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions. Average delay may be reduced with the addition of project traffic to non-critical movements.
4. Change in critical volume to capacity ratio between Existing and Existing plus Project Condition * CMP intersections with LOS E threshold.
4.5 INTERSECTION QUEUING ANALYSIS
The 95th percentile queue lengths were calculated at the signalized study intersection under Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions. The project would add trips to dedicated left- and right-turn lanes at the intersection with dedicated turn lanes, Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue. Table 8 details the existing traffic volumes, added project trips, and queue lengths at all dedicated turn lanes at the signalized study intersection. For locations with dual turn lanes providing varying amounts of storage, the average storage length is provided. The 95th percentile queue lengths are rounded to the nearest five feet 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 27
and assume an average vehicle length of 25 feet. Queue lengths are averaged among all lanes within a lane group.
Under Existing Conditions, the intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would experience queue overflows in the eastbound left turn lane during PM peak hours, and in the southbound left turn lane during all peak hours, during one or both peak hours. Under Existing plus Project Conditions, the same turn lanes would continue to experience overflows during the same peak hours, with some increases in queue lengths. The addition of project trips would not cause any new queue overflows but would increase existing overflows in the Eastbound Left turn lane and the Southbound Left turn lane. Queuing worksheets for each scenario are provided in Appendix B and Appendix D.
Table 8. 95th Percentile Queue Lengths at Selected Turn Lanes:
Existing and Existing plus Project Conditions
Existing
Conditions
Existing plus
Project Conditions
ID Study Intersection Lane
Group
Storage
Length
Peak
Hour
Existing
Volume
Net
Project
Trips
Queue
Length
Queue
Length
Change
in Queue
2 Hercules Ave & San
Pablo Avenue
Eastbound
Left 155 AM 87 4 120 123 5
PM 178 14 175 195 20
Eastbound
Right 160 AM 55 0 0 0 0
PM 201 0 60 60 0
Westbound
Left 300 AM
PM
84 137
0 0
100
180
100
185
0 5
Westbound
Right 165 AM
PM
126
157
3 10
35 20
40 25
5 5
Southbound
Left 90 AM
PM
166
106
8 6
125
100
130
100
5 0
Notes:
95th percentile queue lengths expressed in feet, rounded to the nearest five feet * Average storage per lane, where dual turn lanes provide different storage lengths Bold indicates queue length exceeds storage capacity
Red indicates queue length increases by more than one vehicle length 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 28
Figure 9: Existing plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 29
5.0 CUMULATIVE NO-PROJECT CONDITIONS (2040)
The Cumulative No-Project Conditions analysis forecasts how the study area’s transportation system would operate with the growth and changes of the surrounding community by the year 2040. Corridor volumes on Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue in the immediate project vicinity were obtained from baseline year 2018 and horizon year 2040 in the CCTA traffic model. Based on the growth in these corridor volumes, an annual compounding linear growth rate of 0.82% was applied to adjusted Existing Conditions to project future 2040 traffic volumes.
Figure 10 shows projected turning movement volumes at the study intersections for Cumulative Conditions for a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
5.1 INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – CUMULATIVE NO-PROJECT CONDITIONS The intersection LOS analysis results for Cumulative No-Project Conditions are summarized in Table 12.
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. The unsignalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS B during the p.m. peak hour, with a greater average delay in the southbound direction. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix E.
Table 12: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control Peak Hour
Cumulative Conditions
Average Delay¹ LOS²
1 Hercules Ave and Skelly/Zeus Two-Way Stop
Control
AM 13.5 B (SB)
PM 14.9 B (SB)
2 Hercules Ave and San Pablo
Ave Signal AM 31.7 C
PM 34.3 C
Notes:
AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour
1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.
2. LOS = Level of Service
* CMP intersections with LOS E threshold
Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 30
Figure 10: Cumulative No-Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 31
6.0 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This scenario is identical to Cumulative No-Project Conditions, but with the addition of projected traffic from the proposed project. Trip generation, distribution, and assignment for the proposed project are identical to that assumed under Existing plus Project Conditions.
6.1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS The intersection LOS analysis results for Cumulative plus Project Conditions are summarized in Table 13.
Under this scenario, both of the study intersections would continue to operate within applicable jurisdictional standards during both peak hours. The signalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue would continue to operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour, with an increase in average delay, and degrade to LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. The unsignalized intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly would continue to operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour with a 1-second increase in average delay, and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour with a 2.2-second delay increase, with worse conditions in the southbound direction. The project would be consistent with level of service standards set forth under the Hercules General Plan and CCTA Congestion Management Program.
Figure 13 shows projected turning movement volumes at all the study intersections for Cumulative plus Project Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix F.
Table 13: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Conditions ID Intersection Intersection
Control
Peak
Hour
Cumulative
Conditions
Cumulative plus
Project Conditions
Average
Delay¹ LOS² Average Delay¹ LOS² Change in Delay3
1 Hercules Ave and Skelly/Zeus Two-Way Stop
Controlled
AM 13.5 B (SB) 14.5 B (SB) 1.0
PM 14.9 B (SB) 17.1 C (SB) 2.2
2 Hercules Ave and San Pablo
Ave Signal AM 31.7 C 32.7 C 1.0
PM 34.3 C 35.2 D 0.9
Notes: AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour, Weekend – Saturday noon peak hour, Bold indicates unacceptable operational conditions based on applicable jurisdictional standards. Red indicates significant impact.
1. Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop – controlled intersections.
2. LOS = Level of Service
3. Change in average delay between Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions. Average delay may be reduced with the addition of project traffic to non-critical movements.
4. Change in critical volume to capacity ratio between Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions * CMP intersections with LOS E threshold.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 32
Figure 11: Cumulative plus Project Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 33
7.0 ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS
The following sections provide additional analyses of other transportation issues associated with the project site, including:
Site access and impacts
On-site circulation
Parking analysis
Recommendations
The analyses in these sections are based on professional judgment in accordance with the standards and methods employed by traffic engineers. Although operational issues are not considered CEQA impacts, they do describe traffic conditions that are relevant to describing the project environment.
7.1 SITE ACCESS
This section analyzes site access for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles based on the site plan presented in Figure 2 (dated November, 2021).
Vehicle Access
Primary access to the project site would be provided by a direct connection to Skelly at the location of the existing driveway. TJKM recommends that the grading plans for the site be carefully evaluated to ensure that the finished grade and landscaping do not create any visual obstructions for vehicles exiting the driveway. Vehicle access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby roadways.
Pedestrian Access
Pedestrian access would be via internal sidewalks connecting to existing sidewalks on Skelly, and via a pedestrian trail to the south of the project site connecting Skelly to San Pablo Avenue. There is one crosswalk at the intersection of Hercules Avenue and Skelly, and there are 4-way signalized crosswalks at the intersection of Hercules Avenue and San Pablo Avenue. Existing pedestrian facilities provide continuous paths to nearby bus stops on San Pablo Avenue and to nearby shopping centers to the southwest of the project site, primarily via trail access. However, as shown in Figure 3, existing sidewalk facilities on San Pablo Avenue to the southwest of the project site terminate between the two pedestrian trail outlets to San Pablo Avenue. This disruption separates pedestrians from nearby shopping centers west of Pinole Creek when travelling along San Pablo Avenue, and may pose accessibility challenges due to the slope of the trail at some points.
A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to pedestrians facilities or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of pedestrian facilities. The proposed project will not result in any such conflicts. Pedestrian access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby pedestrian facilities. 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 34
Bicycle Access
There are existing Class II bike lanes provided on San Pablo Avenue east of Hercules Avenue; an extension of the Class II bike lane is proposed in the Hercules 2018 General Plan Circulation Element. A multi-use trail is present along Pinole Creek to the west of the project site.
An impact to bicyclists occurs if the proposed project disrupt existing bicycle facilities; or conflict or create inconsistencies with adopted bicycle system plans, guidelines, and policies. A significant impact occurs if the proposed project conflicts with applicable or adopted policies, plans or programs related to bicycle facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of bicycle facilities. The proposed project will not result in any such conflicts. Bicycle access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby bicycle facilities.
Transit
A proposed project is considered to have a significant impact on transit if it conflicts with existing or planned transit facilities, or is expected to generate additional transit trips and does not provide adequate facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists to access transit routes and stops. The project site is adequately served by the transit service, as shown in Figure 5. Transit stops on San Pablo Avenue are within a onehalf mile walk from the project site. Spread among multiple bus routes, the existing transit service can accommodate the proposed demand. Therefore, transit access to the project site is considered adequate and would not result in any significant impacts to the nearby transit network.
9.2 ON-SITE CIRCULATION
This section analyzes internal circulation based on the site plan presented in Figure 2 (dated November, 2021).
As shown in Figure 2, the street connecting all homes forms a loop, with westward extension in line with the access point from Skelly providing garage access to four homes. The street is 34-45 feet wide throughout, including sidewalks and on-street parking spaces. There is adequate space for vehicles to maneuver into and out of parking spaces and garages. The project would also provide adequate space for trucks and emergency vehicles to access the site and maneuver as needed, with adequate turning radii for truck access. There are no curb ramps or interior pedestrian crossings within the access loop. In order to ensure accessible pedestrian circulation between all homes and the nearest roadways, at least two curb ramps should be included on the inner side of the loop opposite new ramps on the outer edge of the loop, and a pair of ramps should be added near the connection point to Skelly. On-site circulation for vehicles is considered adequate, but pedestrian circulation could be improved with additional curb ramps.
9.3 PARKING
Under the City of Hercules zoning regulations, the proposed project, consisting of single family residential homes, would be classified as single family residential. The City of Hercules requires 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit (per Article 84-4.12); the proposed project provides 2 covered parking spaces and 2 uncovered parking spaces per unit, with additional overflow parking within the access loop. 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 35
As shown in the site plan dated November, 2021 (Figure 2), the proposed project will construct 40 new dwelling units. The project would require 80 parking spaces for the main dwelling units. The proposed project would construct two-car garages with driveway aprons for each dwelling unit, providing 80 covered spaces, exceeding City requirements, as well as 40 uncovered spaces. The development would also provide 4 parallel on-street parking spaces. All on-street spaces would be marked and contained within the project site, on the private street shared by the planned development and within close proximity to the homes. The proposed parking supply would therefore be more than adequate under City of Hercules requirements and would not produce any parking impacts on surrounding parcels or roadways.
9.4 RECOMMENDATIONS
TJKM recommends the following:
The grading plans for the site should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the finished grade and landscaping do not create any visual obstructions for vehicles exiting driveways. Add curb ramps to provide accessible crossings of loop road near Skelly and the pedestrian path to San Pablo Avenue.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix A – Existing Turning Movement Counts
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080016-001 Day:
City: Hercules Date:
AM 1 0 33 1 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 1 0 21 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0100 0 30 0 22
1 132 0 84
000 00 807
103 0 TEV 288 0 276 0 100
130 0 68 1 PHF 0.92 0.79
102 0 0010
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0118 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0008 AM
0 NONE
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm 34
Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Skelly/Zeus Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/13/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:45 am - 08:45 am 24 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
98 0 171
Cars (AM) 10 HT (AM)
Hercules Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Hercules Ave
85 0 134
CONTROL
2-Way Stop(NB/SB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 8
NORTHBOUND
Skelly/Zeus
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
1 0
0 0
0 0
20 130
0 2
0 0
1 0
0 40 520 5
1 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
2 1
0 0
3 0
001
000
29 132
2 8
68 3
1021
118
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
20 83
1 7
127
1 1032
008
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 2 6 0 0 29
7:15 AM 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 1 10 4 0 54
7:30 AM 0 0 4 0 11 0 2 0 1 27 0 0 0 9 6 0 60
7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 8 0 1 0 0 47 0 0 1 13 7 0 78
8:00 AM 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 20 11 0 71
8:15 AM 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 1 33 0 0 4 28 0 0 77
8:30 AM 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 24 1 0 2 23 4 0 62
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 2 21 1 0 55
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 20 1 58 0 3 1 2 225 1 0 12 130 33 0 486 APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 95.24% 4.76% 93.55% 0.00% 4.84% 1.61% 0.88% 98.68% 0.44% 0.00% 6.86% 74.29% 18.86% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 8 0 33 0 1 1 1 130 1 0 7 84 22 0 288
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.667 0.000 0.688 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.691 0.250 0.000 0.438 0.750 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 21 1 0 2 48 9 0 87
4:15 PM 1 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 2 22 6 0 54
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 8 0 1 0 1 17 0 0 1 25 9 0 64
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 3 37 6 1 71
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 2 31 6 0 62
5:15 PM 0 0 3 0 6 0 2 1 0 19 0 0 1 29 9 1 71
5:30 PM 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 1 26 1 0 2 24 7 0 67
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 17 0 0 2 25 3 0 52
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 1 1 18 0 36 0 4 1 5 146 3 0 15 241 55 2 528 APPROACH %'s : 5.00% 5.00% 90.00% 0.00% 87.80% 0.00% 9.76% 2.44% 3.25% 94.81% 1.95% 0.00% 4.79% 77.00% 17.57% 0.64% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 1 8 0 21 0 1 0 3 68 2 0 8 132 30 1 276
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250 0.667 0.000 0.656 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.810 0.500 0.000 0.667 0.688 0.833 0.250 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
Data - Total
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
07:45 am - 08:45 am
0.923 0.667 0.729 0.702 0.883
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm
0.793 0.500 0.611 0.830 0.725
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 2 5 0 0 26
7:15 AM 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 1 9 4 0 53
7:30 AM 0 0 4 0 11 0 2 0 1 26 0 0 0 9 4 0 57
7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 8 0 1 0 0 45 0 0 1 12 6 0 74
8:00 AM 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 20 10 0 70
8:15 AM 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 1 32 0 0 4 28 0 0 75
8:30 AM 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 1 0 24 1 0 2 23 4 0 62
8:45 AM 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 2 21 1 0 55
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 20 0 57 0 3 1 2 220 1 0 12 127 29 0 472 APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 93.44% 0.00% 4.92% 1.64% 0.90% 98.65% 0.45% 0.00% 7.14% 75.60% 17.26% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 8 0 32 0 1 1 1 127 1 0 7 83 20 0 281
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.667 0.000 0.667 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.706 0.250 0.000 0.438 0.741 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 21 1 0 2 48 9 0 87
4:15 PM 1 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 2 22 5 0 53
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 8 0 1 0 1 17 0 0 1 25 9 0 64
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 3 37 6 1 71
5:00 PM 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 2 31 6 0 61
5:15 PM 0 0 3 0 6 0 2 1 0 19 0 0 1 29 9 1 71
5:30 PM 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 1 26 1 0 2 24 7 0 67
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 17 0 0 2 25 3 0 52
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 1 1 18 0 35 0 4 1 5 146 3 0 15 241 54 2 526 APPROACH %'s : 5.00% 5.00% 90.00% 0.00% 87.50% 0.00% 10.00% 2.50% 3.25% 94.81% 1.95% 0.00% 4.81% 77.24% 17.31% 0.64% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 1 8 0 21 0 1 0 3 68 2 0 8 132 29 1 275
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250 0.667 0.000 0.656 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.810 0.500 0.000 0.667 0.688 0.806 0.250 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm
0.790 0.500 0.611 0.830 0.720
07:45 am - 08:45 am
0.937
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.667 0.708 0.717 0.859
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Cars
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0001000001000100 3
7:15 AM 0000000000000100 1
7:30 AM 0000000001000020 3
7:45 AM 0000000002000110 4
8:00 AM 0000000000000010 1
8:15 AM 0000100001000000 2
8:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 4 0 14
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 42.86% 57.14% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00001000030001207
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:15 PM 0000000000000010 1
4:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:00 PM 0000100000000000 1
5:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00001000000000102
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000101
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm
0.250 0.250
07:45 am - 08:45 am
0.438
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.250 0.375 0.375
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - HT
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: 2-Way Stop(NB/SB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000000000000
APPROACH %'s :
PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000000
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0100010001000100
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000000000000
APPROACH %'s :
PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 289 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000000
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 22-080016-001
1/13/2022
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm
07:45 am - 08:45 am
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning
Movement Count Location: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave Project ID:
City: Hercules Date:
NS/EW Streets:
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 00000000 0
7:15 AM 00120000 3
7:30 AM 10200000 3
7:45 AM 21120000 6
8:00 AM 10010000 2
8:15 AM 11000000 2
8:30 AM 10000000 1
8:45 AM 00000010 1
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 6 2 4 5 0 0 1 0 18
APPROACH %'s : 75.00% 25.00% 44.44% 55.56% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 39 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 5 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 11
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.625 0.500 0.250 0.375
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 12001000 4
4:15 PM 11201100 6
4:30 PM 10000000 1
4:45 PM 12000001 4
5:00 PM 12000000 3
5:15 PM 00100000 1
5:30 PM 21000000 3
5:45 PM 10000000 1
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 8 8 3 0 2 1 0 1 23
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00% 100.00% 0.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 100.00% PEAK HR : 04:00 PM 286 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 4 5 2 0 2 1 0 1 15
PEAK HR FACTOR : 1.000 0.625 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250
22-080016-001
1/13/2022
0.625 0.750 0.250 0.375 0.250
04:00 pm - 05:00 pm
0.458 0.583
PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
0.333
07:45 am - 08:45 am
AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Skelly/Zeus Skelly/Zeus Hercules Ave Hercules Ave
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 22-080016-002 Day:
City: Hercules Date:
AM 125 2 133 0 AM
NOON 0000 NOON
PM 88 10 71 3 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
1110 1 110 0 101
2 346 0 596
003 01 95 0 65
70 0 122 1 TEV 1743 0 1867 0 102
353 0 710 2 PHF 0.93 0.92
44 0 141 1 0 1 0.5 0.5
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 1 70 13 83 PM
NOON 0000 NOON
AM 0 110 5 137 AM
0 NONE
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm 248
Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Hercules Ave Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 1/13/2022
PEAK HOURS
4:00 PM - 06:00 PM
07:45 am - 08:45 am 176 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
865 0 625
Cars (AM) 247 HT (AM)
San Pablo Ave
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
San Pablo Ave
831 0 507
CONTROL
Signalized
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Cars (PM) HT (PM)
0 111
NORTHBOUND
Hercules Ave
Cars (NOON) HT (NOON)
AM NOON PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
PMNOONAMAMNOONPM
0 0
1 1
0 3
00 000
0 4
0 2
3 0
2 20 130 1
0 9
1 0
12 0
000
000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
2 29
1 1
14 1
203
201
110
337
140 95
698
122
881071
701383
0 0
0 0
0 0
000
000
99 567
43 64
339
69 1232130
1085136
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 18 0 22 0 16 0 23 0 5 34 0 0 4 69 6 0 197
7:15 AM 24 1 16 0 16 1 36 0 12 46 11 0 6 132 10 0 311
7:30 AM 28 1 18 0 31 0 32 0 10 53 4 0 13 124 61 321
7:45 AM 34 1 31 0 37 2 43 0 15 109 9 0 12 157 17 1 468
8:00 AM 25 2 48 0 41 0 25 0 19 81 5 0 7 144 24 0 421
8:15 AM 28 2 33 0 38 0 32 0 18 98 15 0 13 147 30 0 454
8:30 AM 23 0 25 0 17 0 25 0 18 65 15 0 33 148 30 1 400
8:45 AM 21 1 15 0 21 0 35 0 14 70 12 1 12 88 21 0 311
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 201 8 208 0 217 3 251 0 111 556 71 1 100 1009 144 3 2883 APPROACH %'s : 48.20% 1.92% 49.88% 0.00% 46.07% 0.64% 53.29% 0.00% 15.02% 75.24% 9.61% 0.14% 7.96% 80.33% 11.46% 0.24% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 110 5 137 0 133 2 125 0 70 353 44 0 65 596 101 2 1743 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.809 0.625 0.714 0.000 0.811 0.250 0.727 0.000 0.921 0.810 0.733 0.000 0.492 0.949 0.842 0.500 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 10 1 11 0 17 1 19 0 45 177 19 0 26 97 25 0 448
4:15 PM 14 0 12 0 18 1 14 0 26 151 27 0 29 90 24 0 406
4:30 PM 20 2 11 0 12 2 23 0 31 196 28 1 18 79 22 0 445
4:45 PM 10 7 19 0 14 1 20 2 34 164 35 2 19 94 27 0 448
5:00 PM 17 2 20 0 20 3 16 1 29 177 26 1 28 73 25 0 438
5:15 PM 22 3 23 0 17 5 21 0 30 204 34 0 33 81 36 1 510
5:30 PM 21 1 21 1 20 1 31 0 29 165 46 0 15 98 22 0 471
5:45 PM 8 0 19 0 20 1 12 0 32 166 41 0 23 84 17 0 423
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 122 16 136 1 138 15 156 3 256 1400 256 4 191 696 198 1 3589 APPROACH %'s : 44.36% 5.82% 49.45% 0.36% 44.23% 4.81% 50.00% 0.96% 13.36% 73.07% 13.36% 0.21% 17.59% 64.09% 18.23% 0.09% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 12:00 AM TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 70 13 83 1 71 10 88 3 122 710 141 3 95 346 110 1 1867 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.795 0.464 0.902 0.250 0.888 0.500 0.710 0.375 0.897 0.870 0.766 0.375 0.720 0.883 0.764 0.250 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
Data - Total
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
07:45 am - 08:45 am
0.931 0.840 0.793 0.878 0.901
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm
0.915 0.870 0.827 0.910 0.914
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 17 0 22 0 16 0 23 0 4 30 0 0 4 65 6 0 187
7:15 AM 24 1 16 0 16 1 35 0 12 41 11 0 6 129 9 0 301
7:30 AM 28 1 18 0 31 0 32 0 9 47 4 0 13 119 5 1 308
7:45 AM 34 1 30 0 35 2 42 0 14 104 9 0 11 153 16 1 452
8:00 AM 25 2 48 0 41 0 25 0 19 76 5 0 7 131 23 0 402
8:15 AM 27 2 33 0 38 0 31 0 18 95 14 0 13 141 30 0 442
8:30 AM 22 0 25 0 16 0 25 0 18 64 15 0 33 142 30 1 391
8:45 AM 21 1 15 0 21 0 34 0 14 64 12 1 12 78 20 0 293
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 198 8 207 0 214 3 247 0 108 521 70 1 99 958 139 3 2776 APPROACH %'s : 47.94% 1.94% 50.12% 0.00% 46.12% 0.65% 53.23% 0.00% 15.43% 74.43% 10.00% 0.14% 8.26% 79.90% 11.59% 0.25% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 108 5 136 0 130 2 123 0 69 339 43 0 64 567 99 2 1687 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.794 0.625 0.708 0.000 0.793 0.250 0.732 0.000 0.908 0.815 0.717 0.000 0.485 0.926 0.825 0.500 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 10 1 11 0 17 1 19 0 45 173 19 0 26 94 25 0 441
4:15 PM 14 0 12 0 18 1 14 0 26 145 27 0 29 85 23 0 394
4:30 PM 20 2 11 0 12 2 23 0 31 193 28 1 18 75 22 0 438
4:45 PM 10 7 19 0 14 1 20 2 34 159 34 2 19 90 27 0 438
5:00 PM 17 2 20 0 20 3 16 1 29 175 26 1 28 71 25 0 434
5:15 PM 22 3 23 0 17 5 21 0 30 201 34 0 33 79 36 1 505
5:30 PM 21 1 21 1 20 1 31 0 29 163 46 0 15 97 22 0 468
5:45 PM 8 0 19 0 19 1 12 0 32 163 41 0 21 82 17 0 415
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 122 16 136 1 137 15 156 3 256 1372 255 4 189 673 197 1 3533 APPROACH %'s : 44.36% 5.82% 49.45% 0.36% 44.05% 4.82% 50.16% 0.96% 13.57% 72.71% 13.51% 0.21% 17.83% 63.49% 18.58% 0.09% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 70 13 83 1 71 10 88 3 122 698 140 3 95 337 110 1 1845 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.795 0.464 0.902 0.250 0.888 0.500 0.710 0.375 0.897 0.868 0.761 0.375 0.720 0.869 0.764 0.250 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm
0.913 0.870 0.827 0.908 0.911
07:45 am - 08:45 am
0.933
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.830 0.807 0.888 0.888
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Cars
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 1000000014000400 10
7:15 AM 0000001005000310 10
7:30 AM 0000000016000510 13
7:45 AM 0010201015001410 16
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 13 1 0 19
8:15 AM 1000001003100600 12
8:30 AM 1000100001000600 9
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 10 1 0 18
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 3 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 3 35 1 0 1 51 5 0 107
APPROACH %'s : 75.00% 0.00% 25.00% 0.00% 42.86% 0.00% 57.14% 0.00% 7.69% 89.74% 2.56% 0.00% 1.75% 89.47% 8.77% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 2 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 1 14 1 0 1 29 2 0 56
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.250 0.700 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.558 0.500 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000004000300 7
4:15 PM 0000000006000510 12
4:30 PM 0000000003000400 7
4:45 PM 0000000005100400 10
5:00 PM 0000000002000200 4
5:15 PM 0000000003000200 5
5:30 PM 0000000002000100 3
5:45 PM 0000100003002200 8
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 28 1 0 2 23 1 0 56
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 96.55% 3.45% 0.00% 7.69% 88.46% 3.85% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 9 0 0 22
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.600 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.563 0.000 0.000 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm
0.550 0.542 0.563
07:45 am - 08:45 am
0.737
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.750 0.417 0.667 0.571
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - HT
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave
City: Hercules Project ID:
Control: Signalized Date:
NS/EW Streets:
1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:15 AM 0000000003000000 3
7:30 AM 1000000000000000 1
7:45 AM 0100000000000000 1
8:00 AM 0000000000000100 1
8:15 AM 0000000001000000 1
8:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 11000000040001007
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 01000000010001003
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
4:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:15 PM 0000000000000010 1
4:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000000000101
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000000000
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 22-080016-002
1/13/2022
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm
07:45 am - 08:45 am
0.750
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.250 0.250 0.250
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning
Movement Count Location: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave Project ID:
City: Hercules Date:
NS/EW Streets:
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 01000010 2
7:15 AM 00030020 5
7:30 AM 10000020 3
7:45 AM 01000000 1
8:00 AM 00000001 1
8:15 AM 11002110 6
8:30 AM 01000120 4
8:45 AM 01000001 2
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 2 5 0 3 2 2 8 2 24
APPROACH %'s : 28.57% 71.43% 0.00% 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 80.00% 20.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 39 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 3 0 0 2 2 3 1 12
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.750 0.250 0.500 0.375 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 10003110 6
4:15 PM 01001000 2
4:30 PM 00012000 3
4:45 PM 10000100 2
5:00 PM 00003110 5
5:15 PM 00001100 2
5:30 PM 11000000 2
5:45 PM 00000000 0
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 3 2 0 1 10 4 2 0 22
APPROACH %'s : 60.00% 40.00% 0.00% 100.00% 71.43% 28.57% 100.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 289 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 2 1 0 0 4 3 1 0 11
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.250 0.333 0.750 0.250
22-080016-002
1/13/2022
0.550 0.375 0.438 0.250
04:45 pm - 05:45 pm
0.500 0.500
PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
0.333 0.500
07:45 am - 08:45 am
AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Hercules Ave Hercules Ave San Pablo Ave San Pablo Ave
SAN PABLO AVE SAN PABLO AVE HERCULES AVE HERCULES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 13 HERCULES AVE & SAN PABLO AVE AM
Date and Start Time: Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - All Vehicles
Traffic Counts
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.
Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk
Peak Hour: 07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
379 108
1,026
719
79 308
462
1,269
0.96 N
S
W E
0.89 0.87
0.84 0.91
(662) (260)
(2,000)
(1,265)
(2,360)
(883)
(173) (513) 207
1 167
47 926
51 24
382
56 2
0 4
01364168
SAN PABLO AVE
SAN PABLO AVE
HERCULES AVE
HERCULES AVE
9 8
3 5
N
S
W E
4 4
0 3
7 2
1 4
Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrain Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 7:00 AM 0 12 63 5 0 7 243 11 0 38 1 24 0 37 1 38 480 2,131 2 1 0 2 7:15 AM 0 11 57 5 2 5 288 12 0 34 1 32 1 26 2 60 536 2,175 1 3 0 5 7:30 AM 0 15 97 8 0 9 252 4 0 34 0 33 0 37 1 59 549 2,133 2 1 1 0 7:45 AM 0 12 117 6 0 12 203 17 0 39 0 53 0 60 0 47 566 2,065 2 3 1 2 8:00 AM 0 18 111 5 0 25 183 14 0 29 3 50 0 44 1 41 524 1,927 0 1 0 2 8:15 AM 0 12 83 10 0 24 201 29 0 28 0 24 1 44 0 38 494 3 2 1 1 8:30 AM 1 22 87 8 1 23 223 21 0 19 0 21 0 23 0 32 481 2 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 21 91 6 1 10 159 21 0 27 1 22 0 25 0 44 428 5 1 0 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Lights 0 53 363 24 2 49 898 46 0 136 4 168 1 166 4 203 2,117 Mediums 0 3 17 0 0 2 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 54
Total 0 56 382 24 2 51 926 47 0 136 4 168 1 167 4 207 2,175
SAN PABLO AVE SAN PABLO AVE HERCULES AVE HERCULES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 13 HERCULES AVE & SAN PABLO AVE PM
Date and Start Time: Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - All Vehicles
Traffic Counts
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.
Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk
Peak Hour: 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
156 320
721
1,454
240 142
1,646
651
0.91 N
S
W E
0.83 0.83
0.87 0.93
(296) (630)
(1,334)
(2,772)
(1,183)
(3,164)
(471) (262) 89
0 57
130
492
98 132
1,333
181
1 0
10 070963
SAN PABLO AVE
SAN PABLO AVE
HERCULES AVE
HERCULES AVE
9 13
0 4
N
S
W E
9 4
0 0
0 9
4 0
Left Thru Right Total
Interval Eastbound
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrain Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 4:00 PM 0 49 258 28 0 16 91 19 0 7 2 23 0 8 1 19 521 2,475 2 5 1 1 4:15 PM 0 53 365 31 0 31 65 22 0 17 2 11 0 21 1 16 635 2,571 0 2 1 0 4:30 PM 0 47 357 31 0 25 115 25 0 16 2 11 0 20 4 25 678 2,665 1 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 46 324 25 0 23 99 39 0 23 1 17 0 16 4 24 641 2,637 1 6 0 0 5:00 PM 0 35 311 39 1 23 113 28 0 15 2 18 0 13 1 18 617 2,581 2 3 0 9 5:15 PM 0 53 341 37 0 27 165 38 0 16 4 17 0 8 1 22 729 0 3 0 0 5:30 PM 0 50 305 25 0 31 148 26 0 15 2 13 0 13 2 20 650 0 3 0 0 5:45 PM 3 59 267 25 1 39 98 26 0 13 0 15 0 18 1 20 585 1 4 0 1 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lights 0 178 1,316 132 1 98 473 129 0 69 9 63 0 56 10 88 2,622 Mediums 0 3 16 0 0 0 19 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 42
Total 0 181 1,333 132 1 98 492 130 0 70 9 63 0 57 10 89 2,665 215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix B – Existing Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 7:00 am Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 9 105 27 0 0 10 42 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 9 105 27 0 0 10 42 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 04407000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 1 231 1 10 119 31 0 0 15 58 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 157 0 0 236 0 0 393 415 236 403 400 142 Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 - 162 162 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 155 177 - 241 238 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1423 - - 1331 - - 566 528 803 558 538 906 Stage 1 - - - - - - 765 708 - 840 764 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 847 753 - 762 708 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - 1326 - - 559 517 800 540 527 900 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 559 517 - 540 527 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 761 704 - 833 753 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 839 742 - 747 704 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.6 12.4
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 800 1414 - - 1326 - - 545
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 0.001 - - 0.008 - - 0.108
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 7.5 0 - 7.7 0 - 12.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.4
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 7:00 am Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 87 440 55 84 744 126 137 6 171 166 2 156 Future Volume (veh/h) 87 440 55 84 744 126 137 6 171 166 2 156 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 500 62 93 827 140 163 7 204 210 3 197 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 127 1047 459 120 1032 448 210 10 277 273 409 345 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1559 1781 3554 1541 1781 52 1511 1781 1870 1576 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 500 62 93 827 140 163 0 211 210 3 197 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1559 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1576 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.3 6.9 1.7 3.1 12.8 4.2 5.3 0.0 7.6 6.8 0.1 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.3 6.9 1.7 3.1 12.8 4.2 5.3 0.0 7.6 6.8 0.1 6.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 127 1047 459 120 1032 448 210 0 287 273 409 345 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.48 0.14 0.78 0.80 0.31 0.78 0.00 0.74 0.77 0.01 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 164 1089 478 206 1173 508 445 0 492 537 686 578 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.3 17.3 15.5 27.4 19.6 16.5 25.6 0.0 23.0 24.3 18.2 20.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.4 0.3 0.1 10.3 3.6 0.4 6.0 0.0 3.7 4.5 0.0 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 2.5 0.6 1.5 5.1 1.3 2.5 0.0 2.9 3.1 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 17.6 15.6 37.7 23.2 16.9 31.6 0.0 26.7 28.8 18.3 22.3 LnGrp LOS D B B D C B C A C C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 661 1060 374 410
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.3 23.7 28.8 25.6
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.7 15.5 8.5 22.1 11.5 17.6 8.7 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.8 9.6 5.1 8.9 7.3 8.7 5.3 14.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.9 0.0 2.3 0.2 0.5 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1
HCM 6th LOS C
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 4:00 pm Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 13 188 43 1 1 11 30 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 13 188 43 1 1 11 30 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 02209103301
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 5 117 4 18 258 59 2 2 22 49 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 326 0 0 123 0 0 457 493 124 477 466 298 Stage 1 - - - - - - 131 131 - 333 333 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 326 362 - 144 133 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 - - 1464 - - 514 477 927 498 494 741 Stage 1 - - - - - - 873 788 - 681 644 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 687 625 - 859 786 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1223 - - 1461 - - 504 463 923 472 479 734 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 504 463 - 472 479 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 868 783 - 672 629 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 675 610 - 831 781 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.4 9.6 13.4
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 809 1223 - - 1461 - - 477
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 0.004 - - 0.012 - - 0.107
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 8 0 - 7.5 0 - 13.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.4
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 4:00 pm Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 178 1013 201 137 494 157 101 19 118 106 14 126 Future Volume (veh/h) 178 1013 201 137 494 157 101 19 118 106 14 126 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 196 1113 221 151 543 173 116 22 136 128 17 152 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 242 1329 584 189 1222 531 150 33 204 183 315 263 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1545 1781 220 1361 1781 1870 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 196 1113 221 151 543 173 116 0 158 128 17 152 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1545 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.2 19.2 6.9 5.6 8.0 5.6 4.3 0.0 6.4 4.7 0.5 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.2 19.2 6.9 5.6 8.0 5.6 4.3 0.0 6.4 4.7 0.5 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 242 1329 584 189 1222 531 150 0 237 183 315 263 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.84 0.38 0.80 0.44 0.33 0.77 0.00 0.67 0.70 0.05 0.58 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 363 1452 638 209 1222 531 328 0 437 476 673 563 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.2 19.2 15.4 29.4 17.1 16.3 30.2 0.0 27.0 29.2 23.5 25.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.0 4.2 0.4 17.9 0.3 0.4 8.1 0.0 3.2 4.8 0.1 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 7.6 2.2 3.1 2.9 1.8 2.1 0.0 2.5 2.2 0.2 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.3 23.4 15.8 47.3 17.4 16.7 38.2 0.0 30.2 34.0 23.6 27.8 LnGrp LOS D C B D B B D A CCCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 1530 867 274 297
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.9 22.4 33.6 30.2
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.4 14.6 11.6 29.7 10.2 15.8 13.7 27.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.7 8.4 7.6 21.2 6.3 8.0 9.2 10.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.6 0.0 3.9 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Queues Timing Plan: AM Peak
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 7:00 am Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 500 63 93 827 140 163 211 210 3 197 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.43 0.10 0.49 0.76 0.25 0.54 0.58 0.60 0.01 0.50 Control Delay 51.5 20.5 0.3 38.9 26.9 5.3 31.4 12.3 30.9 23.5 9.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.5 20.5 0.3 38.9 26.9 5.3 31.4 12.3 30.9 23.5 9.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 78 0 33 141 0 56 2 71 1 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #118 147 0 #98 #288 37 111 47 123 7 33 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 156 1156 607 196 1120 583 423 615 511 655 675 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.43 0.10 0.47 0.74 0.24 0.39 0.34 0.41 0.00 0.29 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Queues Timing Plan: PM
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Conditions, 01/13/2022 4:00 pm Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 1113 221 151 543 173 116 158 128 17 152 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.47 0.26 0.49 0.55 0.50 0.06 0.39 Control Delay 40.0 27.2 6.0 60.5 22.4 2.3 36.8 16.2 35.5 28.6 6.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.0 27.2 6.0 60.5 22.4 2.3 36.8 16.2 35.5 28.6 6.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 217 10 65 98 0 47 9 52 7 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #176 #408 60 #182 174 19 100 57 98 22 24 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 340 1365 714 196 1157 661 307 515 446 632 650 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.47 0.26 0.38 0.31 0.29 0.03 0.23 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix C – CCTA TAZ Boundaries
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix D – Existing plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing plus Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 16 105 27 0 0 31 42 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 162 1 16 105 27 0 0 31 42 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 04407000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - -----------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 1 231 1 18 119 31 0 0 46 58 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 157 0 0 236 0 0 409 431 236 435 416 142 Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 - 178 178 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 171 193 - 257 238 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1423 - - 1331 - - 553 517 803 531 527 906 Stage 1 - - - - - - 765 708 - 824 752 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 831 741 - 748 708 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1414 - - 1326 - - 544 503 800 491 513 900 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 544 503 - 491 513 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 761 704 - 817 735 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 817 725 - 704 704 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 9.8 13.2
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 800 1414 - - 1326 - - 496
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.001 - - 0.014 - - 0.119
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.5 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.4
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing plus Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 91 440 55 84 744 129 137 6 171 174 2 169 Future Volume (veh/h) 91 440 55 84 744 129 137 6 171 174 2 169 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 500 62 93 827 143 163 7 204 220 3 214 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 132 1049 460 120 1024 444 210 9 276 282 417 352 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1559 1781 3554 1541 1781 52 1511 1781 1870 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 500 62 93 827 143 163 0 211 220 3 214 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1559 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1577 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 7.0 1.8 3.1 13.1 4.4 5.4 0.0 7.7 7.2 0.1 7.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 7.0 1.8 3.1 13.1 4.4 5.4 0.0 7.7 7.2 0.1 7.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 132 1049 460 120 1024 444 210 0 285 282 417 352 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.48 0.13 0.78 0.81 0.32 0.78 0.00 0.74 0.78 0.01 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 162 1072 470 203 1154 500 438 0 484 529 675 569 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.6 17.5 15.7 27.8 20.0 16.9 26.0 0.0 23.4 24.5 18.3 21.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.9 0.3 0.1 10.3 3.9 0.4 6.1 0.0 3.7 4.7 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 2.5 0.6 1.6 5.2 1.4 2.5 0.0 3.0 3.3 0.0 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.5 17.9 15.8 38.2 23.9 17.3 32.1 0.0 27.2 29.2 18.3 22.9 LnGrp LOS D B B D C B C A C C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 665 1063 374 437
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.0 24.3 29.3 26.0
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.1 15.6 8.6 22.4 11.6 18.0 9.0 22.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.2 9.7 5.1 9.0 7.4 9.4 5.4 15.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.8 0.0 2.3 0.2 0.6 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.7
HCM 6th LOS C
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 37 188 43 1 1 25 30 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 4 97 3 37 188 43 1 1 25 30 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 2 2 0 9 1 0 3 3 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 117 4 51 258 59 2 2 50 49 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 326 0 0 123 0 0 523 559 124 557 532 298 Stage 1 - - - - - - 131 131 - 399 399 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 392 428 - 158 133 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 - - 1464 - - 465 438 927 441 453 741 Stage 1 - - - - - - 873 788 - 627 602 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 633 585 - 844 786 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1223 - - 1461 - - 446 413 923 396 427 734 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 446 413 - 396 427 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 868 783 - 619 571 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 604 555 - 791 781 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 1 9.5 15.2
HCM LOS A C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 850 1223 - - 1461 - - 402
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 0.004 - - 0.035 - - 0.126
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 8 0 - 7.6 0 - 15.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.4
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 192 1013 201 137 494 167 101 19 118 112 14 134 Future Volume (veh/h) 192 1013 201 137 494 167 101 19 118 112 14 134 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 211 1113 221 151 543 184 116 22 136 135 17 161 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 258 1324 582 189 1186 515 150 33 204 189 321 269 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1545 1781 220 1361 1781 1870 1566 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 211 1113 221 151 543 184 116 0 158 135 17 161 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1545 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1566 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 19.4 7.0 5.6 8.1 6.1 4.3 0.0 6.4 5.0 0.5 6.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 19.4 7.0 5.6 8.1 6.1 4.3 0.0 6.4 5.0 0.5 6.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 258 1324 582 189 1186 515 150 0 237 189 321 269 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.84 0.38 0.80 0.46 0.36 0.77 0.00 0.67 0.71 0.05 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 360 1442 633 208 1186 515 326 0 434 473 668 559 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.1 19.4 15.5 29.6 17.8 17.1 30.4 0.0 27.2 29.3 23.5 25.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.9 4.4 0.4 18.2 0.3 0.4 8.1 0.0 3.2 4.9 0.1 2.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.8 7.7 2.2 3.2 3.0 2.0 2.1 0.0 2.6 2.3 0.2 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.0 23.8 16.0 47.8 18.0 17.5 38.5 0.0 30.5 34.2 23.5 28.1 LnGrp LOS D C B D B B D A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1545 878 274 313
Approach Delay, s/veh 24.6 23.0 33.8 30.5
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 14.6 11.7 29.7 10.2 16.1 14.3 27.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 8.4 7.6 21.4 6.3 8.4 9.8 10.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.6 0.0 3.8 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Queues Timing Plan: AM Peak
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/26/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing plus Project Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 103 500 63 93 827 143 163 211 220 3 214 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.43 0.10 0.49 0.76 0.25 0.54 0.58 0.61 0.01 0.52 Control Delay 54.0 20.6 0.3 39.1 27.1 5.5 31.6 12.4 31.3 23.5 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.0 20.6 0.3 39.1 27.1 5.5 31.6 12.4 31.3 23.5 9.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 38 80 0 33 142 0 56 2 75 1 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #123 147 0 #98 #288 39 111 47 129 7 34 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 155 1151 605 195 1114 581 421 613 509 652 683 Starvation Cap Reductn 00000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 00000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 00000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.43 0.10 0.48 0.74 0.25 0.39 0.34 0.43 0.00 0.31 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Queues Timing Plan: PM
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Existing Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 1113 221 151 543 184 116 158 135 17 161 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.48 0.28 0.49 0.55 0.51 0.06 0.41 Control Delay 41.7 27.6 6.1 61.2 22.9 2.7 37.0 16.2 35.7 28.5 7.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.7 27.6 6.1 61.2 22.9 2.7 37.0 16.2 35.7 28.5 7.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 84 220 10 65 100 0 47 9 55 7 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #197 #412 61 #183 176 25 101 58 102 22 29 Internal Link Dist (ft) 335 442 438 310
Turn Bay Length (ft) 155 160 300 165 90
Base Capacity (vph) 338 1359 712 195 1132 652 306 513 445 629 648 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.82 0.31 0.77 0.48 0.28 0.38 0.31 0.30 0.03 0.25 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix E – Cumulative Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 10 122 31 0 0 12 49 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 10 122 31 0 0 12 49 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 0 4 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 269 1 11 139 35 0 0 18 67 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 181 0 0 274 0 0 455 479 274 467 462 164 Stage 1 - - - - - - 276 276 - 186 186 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 179 203 - 281 276 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1394 - - 1289 - - 515 486 765 506 497 881 Stage 1 - - - - - - 730 682 - 816 746 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 823 733 - 726 682 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1385 - - 1284 - - 508 475 762 487 486 875 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 508 475 - 487 486 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 726 679 - 809 733 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 813 721 - 708 679 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.8 13.5
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 762 1385 - - 1284 - - 491
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.001 - - 0.009 - - 0.139
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.6 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.5
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 101 510 64 97 862 146 159 7 198 192 2 181 Future Volume (veh/h) 101 510 64 97 862 146 159 7 198 192 2 181 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 580 73 108 958 162 189 8 236 243 3 229 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 144 1045 458 138 1032 448 236 10 296 298 431 364 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1558 1781 3554 1541 1781 51 1512 1781 1870 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 580 73 108 958 162 189 0 244 243 3 229 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1558 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1577 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 9.3 2.4 4.0 17.8 5.7 7.0 0.0 10.1 8.9 0.1 8.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 9.3 2.4 4.0 17.8 5.7 7.0 0.0 10.1 8.9 0.1 8.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 144 1045 458 138 1032 448 236 0 306 298 431 364 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.56 0.16 0.78 0.93 0.36 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.82 0.01 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 144 1045 458 181 1032 448 391 0 433 473 604 509 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 20.2 17.7 30.7 23.4 19.1 28.6 0.0 26.0 27.2 20.1 23.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.8 0.6 0.2 14.8 13.9 0.5 6.2 0.0 6.8 6.0 0.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 3.5 0.8 2.2 8.6 1.9 3.3 0.0 4.2 4.2 0.0 3.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.4 20.8 17.9 45.5 37.3 19.6 34.8 0.0 32.7 33.2 20.1 25.3 LnGrp LOS E C B D D B C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 768 1228 433 475
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.9 35.7 33.6 29.3
Approach LOS C D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.8 17.8 9.8 24.4 13.5 20.1 10.0 24.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.9 12.1 6.0 11.3 9.0 10.9 6.3 19.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.8 0.0 2.2 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.7
HCM 6th LOS C
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS 4:00 pm 01/13/2022 Cumulative Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 15 218 50 1 1 13 35 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 15 218 50 1 1 13 35 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 2 2 0 9 1 0 3 3 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 6 135 4 21 299 68 2 2 26 57 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 376 0 0 141 0 0 528 569 142 550 537 343 Stage 1 - - - - - - 151 151 - 384 384 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 377 418 - 166 153 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1182 - - 1442 - - 461 432 906 446 450 700 Stage 1 - - - - - - 851 772 - 639 611 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 644 591 - 836 771 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1172 - - 1439 - - 450 416 902 418 434 693 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 450 416 - 418 434 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 844 766 - 629 594 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 630 574 - 803 765 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0.4 9.7 14.9
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 788 1172 - - 1439 - - 423
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 0.005 - - 0.014 - - 0.14
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 8.1 0 - 7.5 0 - 14.9
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.5
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS 4:00 pm 01/13/2022 Cumulative Conditions Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 206 1174 233 159 572 182 117 22 137 123 16 146 Future Volume (veh/h) 206 1174 233 159 572 182 117 22 137 123 16 146 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 226 1290 256 175 629 200 134 25 157 148 19 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 270 1335 586 192 1181 513 171 35 217 198 327 274 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.38 0.38 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1545 1781 217 1364 1781 1870 1566 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 226 1290 256 175 629 200 134 0 182 148 19 176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1545 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1566 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.0 26.1 9.0 7.1 10.5 7.3 5.4 0.0 8.0 5.9 0.6 7.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 26.1 9.0 7.1 10.5 7.3 5.4 0.0 8.0 5.9 0.6 7.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 270 1335 586 192 1181 513 171 0 252 198 327 274 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.97 0.44 0.91 0.53 0.39 0.78 0.00 0.72 0.75 0.06 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 333 1335 586 192 1181 513 302 0 402 438 618 518 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.2 22.4 17.1 32.3 19.8 18.8 32.4 0.0 29.2 31.5 25.2 28.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.3 17.2 0.5 40.7 0.5 0.5 7.6 0.0 3.9 5.5 0.1 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 12.7 2.9 5.0 4.0 2.4 2.6 0.0 3.2 2.8 0.3 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.5 39.6 17.6 73.0 20.3 19.2 40.0 0.0 33.1 37.0 25.3 30.6 LnGrp LOS D D B E C B D A C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1772 1004 316 343
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.1 29.3 36.1 33.1
Approach LOS D C D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.7 16.2 12.4 32.0 11.5 17.3 15.6 28.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.9 10.0 9.1 28.1 7.4 9.7 11.0 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.2 3.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.3
HCM 6th LOS C
215 Skelly Residential Traffic Impact Study
Appendix F – Cumulative plus Project Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: AM Peak
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 17 122 31 0 0 33 49 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 188 1 17 122 31 0 0 33 49 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 0 4 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 88 88 88 67 67 67 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 269 1 19 139 35 0 0 49 67 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 181 0 0 274 0 0 471 495 274 498 478 164 Stage 1 - - - - - - 276 276 - 202 202 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 195 219 - 296 276 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1394 - - 1289 - - 503 476 765 483 486 881 Stage 1 - - - - - - 730 682 - 800 734 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 807 722 - 712 682 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1385 - - 1284 - - 494 463 762 443 472 875 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 494 463 - 443 472 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 726 679 - 794 717 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 793 705 - 665 679 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.8 10.1 14.5
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 762 1385 - - 1284 - - 447
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 0.001 - - 0.015 - - 0.153
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.6 0 - 7.8 0 - 14.5
HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.5
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: AM Peak 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 105 510 64 97 862 149 159 7 198 200 2 194 Future Volume (veh/h) 105 510 64 97 862 149 159 7 198 200 2 194 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 119 580 73 108 958 166 189 8 236 253 3 246 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.79 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 143 1035 454 138 1025 444 235 10 296 307 441 372 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1558 1781 3554 1541 1781 51 1512 1781 1870 1577 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 119 580 73 108 958 166 189 0 244 253 3 246 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1558 1781 1777 1541 1781 0 1563 1781 1870 1577 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 9.4 2.4 4.1 17.9 5.9 7.0 0.0 10.2 9.4 0.1 9.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 9.4 2.4 4.1 17.9 5.9 7.0 0.0 10.2 9.4 0.1 9.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 143 1035 454 138 1025 444 235 0 306 307 441 372 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.56 0.16 0.78 0.94 0.37 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.82 0.01 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 143 1035 454 180 1025 444 388 0 430 469 599 505 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.0 20.5 18.0 30.9 23.7 19.4 28.8 0.0 26.2 27.3 20.0 23.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 31.8 0.7 0.2 15.1 15.0 0.5 6.3 0.0 7.0 7.0 0.0 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.1 3.6 0.8 2.2 8.8 2.0 3.3 0.0 4.2 4.4 0.0 3.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.7 21.2 18.2 46.0 38.7 19.9 35.1 0.0 33.2 34.3 20.0 25.7 LnGrp LOS E C B D D B D A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 772 1232 433 502
Approach Delay, s/veh 27.3 36.8 34.0 30.0
Approach LOS C D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.3 17.9 9.8 24.4 13.5 20.6 10.0 24.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.8 6.9 18.3 14.9 21.9 5.5 19.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.4 12.2 6.1 11.4 9.0 11.7 6.5 19.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.8 0.0 2.2 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.7
HCM 6th LOS C
HCM 6th TWSC Timing Plan: PM
1: Skelly/Zeus & Hercules Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 39 218 50 1 1 27 35 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 5 112 3 39 218 50 1 1 27 35 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 9 0 2 2 0 9 1 0 3 3 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 73 73 73 50 50 50 61 61 61
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 6 135 4 53 299 68 2 2 54 57 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 376 0 0 141 0 0 592 633 142 628 601 343 Stage 1 - - - - - - 151 151 - 448 448 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 441 482 - 180 153 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1182 - - 1442 - - 418 397 906 395 414 700 Stage 1 - - - - - - 851 772 - 590 573 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 595 553 - 822 771 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1172 - - 1439 - - 399 372 902 351 388 693 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 399 372 - 351 388 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 844 766 - 581 541 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 565 522 - 764 765 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 1 9.7 17.1
HCM LOS A C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 826 1172 - - 1439 - - 356
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 0.005 - - 0.037 - - 0.166
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 8.1 0 - 7.6 0 - 17.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Timing Plan: PM 2: Hercules Ave & San Pablo Ave 01/28/2022
215 Skelly Residential TIS: Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Synchro 10 Report TJKM Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 220 1174 233 159 572 192 117 22 137 129 16 154 Future Volume (veh/h) 220 1174 233 159 572 192 117 22 137 129 16 154 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 242 1290 256 175 629 211 134 25 157 155 19 186 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 285 1328 584 191 1141 496 171 35 217 205 333 279 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1561 1781 3554 1544 1781 217 1364 1781 1870 1566 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 242 1290 256 175 629 211 134 0 182 155 19 186 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1561 1781 1777 1544 1781 0 1581 1781 1870 1566 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.7 26.3 9.0 7.2 10.7 7.9 5.4 0.0 8.0 6.2 0.6 8.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.7 26.3 9.0 7.2 10.7 7.9 5.4 0.0 8.0 6.2 0.6 8.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 285 1328 584 191 1141 496 171 0 251 205 333 279 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.97 0.44 0.91 0.55 0.43 0.78 0.00 0.72 0.76 0.06 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 332 1328 584 191 1141 496 300 0 400 436 615 515 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.0 22.6 17.3 32.5 20.6 19.6 32.5 0.0 29.4 31.5 25.1 28.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 16.5 18.2 0.5 41.9 0.6 0.6 7.7 0.0 3.9 5.6 0.1 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.2 12.9 3.0 5.1 4.1 0.1 2.7 0.0 3.3 2.9 0.3 3.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.5 40.8 17.8 74.4 21.2 20.2 40.2 0.0 33.3 37.1 25.2 30.9 LnGrp LOS D D B E C C D A C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1788 1015 316 360
Approach Delay, s/veh 38.3 30.1 36.2 33.3
Approach LOS D C D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 16.2 12.4 32.0 11.6 17.6 16.3 28.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.6 7.9 27.5 12.4 24.2 13.7 21.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.2 10.0 9.2 28.3 7.4 10.1 11.7 12.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 3.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.2
HCM 6th LOS D