Hermosa Beach City Council
May 26, 2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting Agenda

Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Open Session at 6:00 PM
Council Chambers
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254

CITY COUNCIL
Mike Detoy, Mayor
Michael D. Keegan, Mayor Pro Tem
Ray Jackson, Councilmember
Dean Francois, Councilmember
Rob Saemann, Councilmember
David Pedersen, City Treasurer

APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Steve Napolitano, City Manager
Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney

EXECUTIVE TEAM
Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director
Martha Alvarez, City Clerk
Alison Becker, Community Development Director
Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director
Landon Phillips, Police Chief
Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 - To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204 or at [email protected] at least 48 hours before the meeting.

PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS
Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate via the following:

Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828?
pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092
•
• Phone: Toll Free: (833) 548 0276; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825 eComment: On the HTML agenda, click an agenda item, then click on the blue “Leave comment” (on computer) / blue speech bubble (on phone/tablet) button to provide a comment for that item. Submit eComments no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. •
Supplemental Email: Submit a supplemental email for agenda items only to [email protected]. Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. Writings distributed to all, or majority of all, of the City Council after the agenda has been posted shall be available for inspection at the City Clerk's Office located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 during regular business hours.
•
The City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. • Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 • Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda
• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option.

Pages

1. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL

4. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS

5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.

Recommended Action:

To approve the order of the agenda.

6. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

6.a RECOGNIZING HERMOSA BEACH CERTIFIED GREEN BUSINESSES

6.b PRESENTATION ON COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY RESULTS 11

7. PUBLIC COMMENT 72
This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate discussion, and Future Agenda Items). If public comment is provided on a Public Hearing or Municipal Matter item, public comment on the same item will not be accepted when the item is heard at a later part of the meeting.

The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker from those present in City Council Chambers and via the remote participation options listed on the agenda. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council.

No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the public will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard.

8. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

9. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period.

Recommended Action:

To approve the consent calendar.

10.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND

RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA
Recommendation:

Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

10.b CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 86
(City Clerk Martha Alvarez)
Recommended Action:

To approve the minutes from the May 12, 2026, Regular Meeting.

10.c CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-058 101
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for May 7, 2026, through May 13, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.

10.d CASH BALANCE REPORT - 26-AS-057 125
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Cash Balance Report.

10.e REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR MARCH 2026 - 26-AS-059
127
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Financial Reports.

10.f CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-056 464
(City Treasurer Dave Pedersen)
Recommended Action:

The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the April 2026 City Treasurer’s Report.

10.g CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MAY 14, 2026 - 26-PW-035
466
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of May 14, 2026.

10.h AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE COMPLETION
OF CIP 619 KELLY COURTS IMPROVEMENTS TO GR PAVING
SOLUTIONS - 26-PW-026
475
CEQA: The Project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and section 15302 (Replacement and Reconstruction). The proposed work is an alteration of existing public structures or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use. Further the proposed work consists of reconstruction of existing court structures where the new courts will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. No exceptions to the CEQA exemption apply.
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

Award a construction contract for the completion of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project 619–Kelly Courts
Improvements to GR Paving Solutions in the amount of
$106,650.00 (Attachment 1);

1. Authorize the Director of Public Works to establish a contract contingency in the amount of $26,663 and to approve contract change orders up to the amount of the approved project
contingency;

2. Adopt the attached resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach Approving the
Construction of CIP 619 Kelly Courts Improvements Project Pursuant to Government Code Section 830.6 and Establishing a Project Payment Account” (Attachment 2);

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract, approve minor modifications as necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk to attesting the agreements, subject to approval by the City Attorney; and

4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following final completion of the project.

5. 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M

11.a ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE

HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-045
599
CEQA: Determine the ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
(Community Development Director Alison Becker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends the City Council:

Conduct a public hearing to consider the proposed
amendments to Title 17 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to the Administrative Procedures;

1. Find that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and

2. Introduce by title only and waive first reading of an Ordinance (Attachment 1) of the City of Hermosa Beach approving the Zone Text Amendment (TA24-01).

3.

11.b ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AMENDING SECTION 3.12

PURCHASING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Continued from the meeting of April 28, 2026
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council continue the Public Hearing to a future City Council Meeting.

12. MUNICIPAL MATTERS

12.a FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS-061 850
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

Receive and File Department Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-2027
Budget Presentations; and

1. Provide direction on a preferred approach to addressing revenue enhancements to minimize impacts to community
services.

2. 12.b CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR-027
879
(Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

Consider approval of the proposed Special Event Policy Guide and fee updates outlined in the staff report; and

1. Consider the amendments proposed by the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Commission outlined in the staff report.

2. 12.c ENDORSEMENT OF ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC’S (DBA

ATHENS SERVICES) REQUEST FOR AN ANNUAL RATE

ADJUSTMENT TO THE MAXIMUM RATES FOR SOLID WASTE
SERVICES - 26-CMO-033
924
(Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss)

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

Endorse the proposed service rate adjustment from Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Athens Services) (“Athens Services”) at amounts not to exceed the attached rate schedule effective July 1, 2026; and

1. Adopt a resolution Approving the Annual Rate Adjustment to the Maximum Rates for Solid Waste Services Pursuant to the Integrated Solid Waste Management Services Agreement with Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Athens Services) (Attachment 3).

2. 12.d AWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR

PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA
LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN. - 26-CMO-032
952
(Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

Award a contract for Sea Level Rise Adaptation Planning to Moffat & Nichol at a not-to-exceed amount of $473,875 for a term of three years ending April 30, 2029; and

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the proposed agreement (Attachment 2) subject to approval by the City Attorney.

2. 12.e AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PROJECT

ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE
CITY YARD PROJECT - 26-PW-025
1086
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

Award a contract for City Yard CEQA and environmental
services to Roux Associates, Inc. (Roux) at a not-to-exceed amount of $498,800 (Attachment 3);

1. Authorize the City Manager to establish a project contingency amount of $75,000 and to approve amendments to the
agreement up to the amount of the approved project
contingency; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, approve minor modifications, if necessary, with the City Clerk attesting the agreement, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

3.

12.f ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE ENGINEER’S REPORT AND SETTING JUNE 23, 2026 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE

ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH

LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING FY
2026–2027 - 26-PW-032
1268
CEQA: Determine that adopting resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15378, 15061(b)(3), 15301(h), and 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines.
(Public Works Director Joe Sanclemente)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) to approve the Engineer’s Report in connection with Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during Fiscal Year (FY) 2026–2027 made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 26-7541;

1. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 2) declaring the City’s invitation to order certain improvements and to levy and collect
assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and
Street Lighting District 2026–2027 for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, and appointing June 23, 2026, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers as the time and place for a public hearing in relation thereto; and

2. Determine that adopting the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.

3. 12.g LETTER OF OPPOSITION FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1383: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BENEFITS - 26-CMO-035
1303
(Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council discuss providing a letter of opposition for Assembly Bill 1383.

13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only.

13.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-034 1313
Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.

14. CITY MANAGER REPORT

15. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item.

Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken.

15.a ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
MEETING OF MARCH 18, 2026
1325
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

15.b POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR APRIL 2026 1333
(Police Chief Landon Philips)

16. ADJOURNMENT

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Table of Contents
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

T ABLE OF C ONTENTS
Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii List of Figures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Motivation for Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Overview of Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Organization of Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Disclaimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 About True North . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Key Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Quality of Life & City Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Quality of Life. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Question 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Changes to Improve Hermosa Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Question 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Overall Performance Rating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Question 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Initial Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Question 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Support by Subgroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Reasons For Not Supporting Measure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Question 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Projects & Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Question 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Service Ratings by Initial Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Positive Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Question 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Top Positive Arguments by Initial Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Interim Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Question 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Support by Subgroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Negative Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Question 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Top Negative Arguments by Initial Support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Final Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Question 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Change in Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Final Ballot Test at Lower Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Question 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Background & Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Questionnaire Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Programming & Pre-Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Sample. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Statistical Margin of Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Recruiting & Data Collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Data Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Rounding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Questionnaires & Toplines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

List of Tables
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 ii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L IST OF T ABLES
Table 1 Demographic Breakdown of Support at Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Table 2 Top Projects & Services by Position at Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Table 3 Top Positive Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Table 4 Demographic Breakdown of Support at Interim Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Table 5 Negative Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Table 6 Demographic Breakdown of Support at Final Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Table 7 Movement Between Initial & Final Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table 8 Demographics of Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

List of Figures
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 iii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L IST OF F IGURES
Figure 1 Quality of Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Figure 2 Quality of Life by Years in Hermosa Beach, Child in Hsld & Homeowner on Voter File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Figure 3 Quality of Life by Age & Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Figure 4 Changes to Improve City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Figure 5 Satisfaction With City Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 6 Satisfaction With City Services by Years in Hermosa Beach, Quality of Life & Child in Hsld. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Figure 7 Satisfaction With City Services by Age, Homeowner on Voter File & Gender . . . . . . 10 Figure 8 Initial Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 9 Reasons for not Supporting Measure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Figure 10 Projects & Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure 11 Positive Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Figure 12 Interim Ballot Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Figure 13 Negative Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Figure 14 Final Ballot Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Figure 15 Final Ballot Test Lower Amount. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Figure 16 Maximum Margin of Error Due to Sampling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Introduction
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

I NTRODUCTION
Located in coastal Los Angeles County, the City of Hermosa Beach is currently home to an estimated 19,063 residents.1 Incorporated in 1907 and operating as a general law city under a Council-Manager form of government, the City’s team of full-time and part-time employees provides a full suite of services through a variety of departments and divisions, including Administrative Services, City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager, Community Development, Finance, Human Resources, Parks & Recreation, Police, Public Works, and Fire and EMS.2 As Hermosa Beach has grown, so too have the demands placed upon its facilities, infrastructure, and services. Unfortunately, the City’s revenue streams have not kept pace with the growing demands and escalating costs, leading to shortfalls in the funding required to adequately address its various infrastructure systems—including streets and roads, sewer and storm drains, parks, and community facilities—as well as municipal services. In total, the City has an estimated $220 million in needed street and infrastructure projects for which it does not have a funding source, as well as projected structural deficits in the revenues needed to sustain city services at their current levels.

MOTIVATION FOR RESEARCH The primary purpose of this study was to produce an unbiased, statistically reliable evaluation of voters' interest in supporting a local sales tax measure to fund city streets, infrastructure, public safety, and other general municipal services.

Additionally, should the City decide to move forward with a measure, the survey data can guide how best to structure the measure so it is consistent with the community's priorities and expressed needs. Specifically, the study was designed to:
• Gauge current, baseline support for enacting a local sales tax to ensure adequate funding for streets, infrastructure, public safety, and general municipal services; • Identify the types of services voters are most interested in funding, should the measure pass;
• Expose voters to arguments in favor of—and against—the proposed tax measure to gauge how information affects support for the measure; and
• Estimate support for the measure once voters are presented with the types of information they will likely be exposed to during an election cycle.

It is important to recognize that voters’ opinions about tax measures are often fluid, particularly when they begin with limited information. The way voters think and feel about a measure today may shift as they are exposed to additional details in the months leading up to election day.

Accordingly, to accurately assess the feasibility of establishing a sales tax increase to fund municipal services, it was important that in addition to measuring current opinions about the measure (Question 5), the survey expose respondents to the types of information voters are likely to encounter during an election cycle, including arguments in favor of (Question 8) and opposed to (Question 10) the measure, and gauge how this type of information ultimately impacts their voting decision (Questions 9 & 11).

1. US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2024 5-Year Estimate.

2. Fire and emergency medical services (EMS) are provided by contract with the Los Angeles County Fire Department.

Introduction
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY For a full discussion of the research methods and techniques used in this study, turn to Methodology on page 28. In brief, the survey was administered to a random sample of 519 voters in the City of Hermosa Beach who are likely to participate in the November 2026 general election, with a subset who are also likely to participate in the lowerturnout June 2026 primary. The survey followed a mixed-method design that employed multiple recruiting methods (email, text, and telephone) and multiple data collection methods (telephone and online). Administered between April 16 and April 23, 2026, the average interview lasted 16 minutes.

ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is designed to meet the needs of readers who prefer a summary of the findings as well as those who are interested in the details of the results.

For those who seek an overview of the findings, the section titled Key Findings is for you. It provides a summary of the most important findings of the survey and a discussion of their implications. For the interested reader, this section is followed by a more detailed question-by-question discussion of the results from the survey by topic area (see Table of Contents), as well as a description of the methodology employed for collecting and analyzing the data. And, for the truly ambitious reader, the questionnaire used for the interviews is contained at the back of this report (see Questionnaires & Toplines on page 31) and a complete set of crosstabulations for the survey results is contained in Appendix A.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS True North thanks the City of Hermosa Beach for the opportunity to assist the City in this important effort. The collective expertise, local knowledge, and insight provided by city staff and representatives improved the overall quality of the research presented here.

DISCLAIMER The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the authors (Dr. Timothy McLarney and Richard Sarles) at True North Research, Inc. and not necessarily those of the City of Hermosa Beach. Any errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

ABOUT TRUE NORTH True North is a full-service survey research firm that is dedicated to providing public and private agencies with a clear understanding of the values, opinions, priorities, and concerns of their residents, voters, and customers. Through designing and implementing scientific surveys, focus groups, and one-on-one interviews as well as expert interpretation of the findings, True North helps its clients to move with confidence when making strategic decisions in a variety of areas—such as planning, policy evaluation, performance management, establishing fiscal priorities, passing revenue measures, and developing effective public information campaigns.

During their careers, Dr. McLarney and Mr. Sarles have designed and conducted over 1,500 survey research studies for public agencies, including more than 500 revenue measure feasibility studies. Of the measures that have gone to ballot based on Dr. McLarney’s recommendation, 93% have been successful. In total, the research that Dr. McLarney has conducted has led to over $42 billion in voter-approved local revenue measures.

Key Findings
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

K EY F INDINGS
As noted in the Introduction, this study was designed to provide the City of Hermosa Beach with a statistically reliable understanding of voters’ interest in establishing a local sales tax to fund general city services. Whereas subsequent sections of this report are devoted to conveying the detailed results of the survey, in this section we attempt to ‘see the forest through the trees’ and note how the collective results of the survey answer some of the key questions that motivated the research. The following conclusions are based on True North’s interpretations of the survey results and the firm’s collective experience conducting revenue measure studies for public agencies throughout the State.

Is it feasible to place a
local sales tax measure
on the November 2026
ballot?
Hermosa Beach voters have a high opinion of the quality of life in the community, and they value the services they receive from the City. These sentiments translate into sufficient natural support (56%) for establishing a one percent sales tax to fund city services, such as paving streets and fixing potholes, repairing aging infrastructure, keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained, fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response, and police and crime prevention.

The results of this baseline survey indicate that a local sales tax measure is likely feasible for the November 2026 ballot provided that it focuses on the projects and services that voters identify as their priorities and is accompanied by robust community/opinion leader engagement, education, and communication (more on this below).

Having stated that a sales tax measure appears feasible, it is important to note that the measure’s prospects will be shaped by external factors (not within the City’s or an independent campaign’s control) and that a recommendation to place the measure on the November 2026 ballot comes with several qualifications and conditions. Indeed, although the results are promising, all revenue measures must overcome challenges prior to being successful. The proposed measure is no exception. The following paragraphs discuss some of the challenges and the next steps that True North recommends.

Which services do voters view as priorities?A general tax is “any tax imposed for general governmental purposes”3 and is distinguished from a special tax in that the funds raised by a general tax are not earmarked for any specific purpose(s). Thus, a general tax provides a municipality with a great deal of flexibility with respect to what is funded by the measure on a year-to-year basis.

Although the Hermosa Beach City Council would have the discretion to decide how to spend the revenues, the survey results indicate that voters are primarily interested in using the proceeds to fund public works and

3. Section 1, Article XIIIC, California Constitution.

Key Findings
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 public safety, including keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained (91% strongly or somewhat favor), paving streets and fixing potholes (89%), maintaining city landscaping and street trees (85%), repairing or replacing aging infrastructure (84%), repairing and maintaining the sewer and stormdrain system (83%), and providing quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies (82%). That said, it is worth noting that every potential use of sales tax proceeds tested was favored by at least two-thirds of voters surveyed.

How might a public
information campaign
affect support for the
proposed measure?
As noted in the body of this report, individuals’ opinions about revenue measures are often not rigid, especially when the amount of information presented to the public on a measure has been limited. Thus, in addition to measuring current support for the measure, one of the goals of this study was to explore how the introduction of additional information about the measure may affect voters’ opinions about the proposal.

It is clear from the survey results that some voters’ opinions about the proposed measure are somewhat sensitive to the nature—and amount— of information that they have about the measure. Information about the specific services that could be funded by the sales tax, as well as arguments in favor of the measure, were found by many voters to be compelling reasons to support the measure—boosting support to 62% at the Interim Ballot Test. However, voters also exhibited sensitivity to opposition arguments, which effectively cooled support for the one percent sales tax measure down to 55% at the Final Ballot Test. There is also a risk that some voters could be swayed by hyper-partisan campaigning during the 2026 election cycle. Accordingly, one of the keys to building and sustaining support for the measure will be the presence of an effective, well-organized public outreach effort, as well as an independent campaign that focuses on the need for the measure as well as the many benefits that it will bring.

How might changes to
the economic or political climate alter support
for the measure?
A survey is a snapshot in time—which means the results of this study and the conclusions noted above must be viewed in light of the current economic and political climates. On the one hand, this should provide some reassurances to the reader that the proposed sales tax measure is likely feasible for 2026. Even in a national environment marred by economic uncertainty, political instability, concerns about tariffs and inflation, rising cost-of-living pressures, and broader skepticism about government spending, 56% of voters were supportive of the proposed measure on the natural.

On the other hand, the months leading up to the November 2026 election are likely to be punctuated with significant events on the economic and political fronts, both domestically and internationally. Exactly how these events unfold and may shape voters’ opinions remains to be seen.

Should the economy and/or political climate improve, support for the

Key Findings
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 measure could increase. Conversely, negative economic and/or political developments (including escalation of the war in Iran, sustained high fuel prices, local opposition, and devolving into a hyper-partisan environment), skewed voter turnout, and/or competing measures could dampen support for the measure below what was recorded in this study.

Quality of Life & City Services
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Q UALITY OF L IFE & C ITY S ERVICES
The opening section of the survey was designed to gauge voters’ opinions regarding the quality of life in Hermosa Beach, their ideas for how it can be improved, as well as their assessment of the City’s performance in providing municipal services.

QUALITY OF LIFE At the outset of the interview, voters were asked to rate the quality of life in the City of Hermosa Beach using a five-point scale of excellent, good, fair, poor, or very poor.

As shown in Figure 1 below, more than nine-in-ten voters surveyed shared favorable opinions of the quality of life in Hermosa Beach, with 49% reporting it is excellent and 45% stating it is good.

Approximately 5% of voters surveyed rated the quality of life in the city as fair, whereas less than 1% used poor or very poor to describe the quality of life in Hermosa Beach.

Question 2 How would you rate the overall quality of life in Hermosa Beach? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 1 QUALITY OF LIFE Figures 2 and 3 show how ratings of the quality
of life in the City of Hermosa Beach varied by
length of residence, presence of a child in the
household, homeownership status, age of the
respondent, and gender. Although ratings varied
slightly across subgroups, the most striking pattern in the figures is the consistency of opinion, as more than nine-in-ten respondents in every
subgroup rated the quality of life in the city as
excellent or good.

FIGURE 2 QUALITY OF LIFE BY YEARS IN HERMOSA BEACH, CHILD IN HSLD & HOMEOWNER ON VOTER FILE Not sure

0.1 Very poor
Poor 0.6

0.3 Fair

5.2 Good

45.0 Excellent

48.7 48.4 50.1 51.7

45.2 44.1 43.5

46.8 45.3 Excellent

46.8 52.8

45.9 49.1
Good

48.5 45.0 47.6 38.8
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
Less than 5 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 or more Yes No Yes No
Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Child in Hsld (Q14) Homeowner on Voter File % Respondents

Quality of Life & City Services
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 FIGURE 3 QUALITY OF LIFE BY AGE & GENDER
CHANGES TO IMPROVE HERMOSA BEACH The next question in this series asked voters to indicate the one thing that city government could change to make Hermosa Beach a better place to live, now and in the future. Question 3 was posed in an open-ended manner, allowing respondents to mention any aspect or attribute that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown in Figure 4 on the next page.

Among the specific changes desired, addressing parking issues (11%) and E-bike issues (11%) were the most common, followed by cleaning up/beautifying the city (7%), addressing homeless issues (6%), limiting growth and development (5%), and supporting local businesses (5%). An additional 15% of respondents could not think of a specific change they would like to see or stated flatly that no changes are needed—everything is fine.

44.5 49.1 49.5

49.3 44.9 44.0

45.2 48.4 50.1
Excellent

63.5 47.7 44.1

45.1 Good

34.7 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
18 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65 or older Male Female Age Gender
% Respondents

Quality of Life & City Services
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Question 3 If the city government could change one thing to make Hermosa Beach a better place to live now and in the future, what change would you like to see? FIGURE 4 CHANGES TO IMPROVE CITY OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING The final question in this series asked respondents to indicate if, overall, they were satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Hermosa Beach is doing to provide city services. Because this question does not reference a specific program, facility, or service and requested that the respondent consider the City’s performance in general, the findings of this question may be regarded as an overall performance rating for the City.

As shown in Figure 5 on the next page, approximately eight-in-ten voters surveyed indicated that they were satisfied with the City of Hermosa Beach’s efforts to provide municipal services, with 31% saying they were very satisfied and 48% somewhat satisfied. Sixteen percent (16%) reported that they were dissatisfied with the City’s overall performance, whereas 5% were unsure or unwilling to state their opinion.

For the interested reader, figures 6 and 7 display how the percentage of respondents satisfied with the City’s overall performance varied across demographic subgroups. When compared to their respective counterparts, newer residents (less than 5 years), younger residents (under 30), and those who rated the overall quality of life in the city as excellent or good were the most likely to report being satisfied with the City’s overall performance in providing services.

11.3 11.1

10.2 7.1

6.0 5.3

5.0 5.0

4.9 4.3

3.9 3.7

3.6 3.5

3.4 3.3

3.2 2.9

2.6 2.4

2.3 2.1

2.1 2.0

2.0 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.7 1.8

3.9 4.5

2.1 0 5 10 15
Address parking issues
Address E-bike issues
Not sure / Cannot think of anything specific
Clean up, beautify City
Address homeless issues
Limit growth, development
No changes needed / Everything is fine
Support small, local businesses
Enforce traffic laws
Improve fiscal management, budgeting
Provide more bike lane connections, separate from walking paths Enforce city codes
Put utilities underground
Provide a community pool
Provide a dog park, dog beach
Improve infrastructure, streets, roads
Improve public safety
Fix, improve the pier
Provide more police presence, response
Improve parks, rec facilities
Enforce noise ordinance
Provide rec activities, events for all ages
Do not allow dogs on beach
Provide more affordable housing
Reduce taxes, fees
Fix, upgrade rundown, empty buildings
Reduce traffic congestion
Improve pedestrian safety, crossings
Reduce building permit restrictions
Improve City Council, Gov process
Improve shopping, dining opportunities
Address rent control issue
Improve public transportation
% Respondents

Quality of Life & City Services
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Question 4 Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Hermosa Beach is doing to provide city services? FIGURE 5 SATISFACTION WITH CITY SERVICES FIGURE 6 SATISFACTION WITH CITY SERVICES BY YEARS IN HERMOSA BEACH, QUALITY OF LIFE & CHILD IN HSLD Very satisfied

31.1 Somewhat
satisfied

48.2 Somewhat
dissatisfied

12.1 Very
dissatisfied

4.0 Not sure

4.1 Prefer not to
answer

0.5 33.0

2.7 26.2

50.2 18.0

50.2 47.9

27.9 33.8 29.0
Very
satisfied

41.3 33.0

47.8 42.1 50.4
Smwt
satisfied

47.3 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
Less than 5 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 or more Excellent,
good
Fair, poor,
very poor
Yes No
Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1) Quality of Life (Q2) Child in Hsld (Q14) % Respondents

Quality of Life & City Services
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 FIGURE 7 SATISFACTION WITH CITY SERVICES BY AGE, HOMEOWNER ON VOTER FILE & GENDER

35.9 31.9 30.2 30.4

42.0 49.3 46.9

51.3 45.4

32.8 Very
satisfied

48.3 26.8

36.6 18.6
Smwt
satisfied

43.3 55.4

43.8 53.5
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
18 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 64 65 or older Yes No Male Female Age Homeowner on Voter File Gender
% Respondents

Initial Ballot Test
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

I NITIAL B ALLOT T EST
The primary research objective of this survey was to estimate voters’ support for establishing a one percent sales tax to provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes, repairing aging infrastructure, keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained, fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response, and police and crime prevention. To this end, Question 5 was designed to take an early assessment of voters’ support for the proposed measure.

The motivation for placing Question 5 near the front of the survey is twofold. First, voter support for a measure can often depend on the amount of information they have about a measure. At this point in the survey, the respondent has not been provided information about the proposed measure beyond what is presented in the ballot language. This situation is analogous to a voter casting a ballot with limited knowledge about the measure, such as what might occur in the absence of an effective campaign. Question 5, also known as the Initial Ballot Test, is thus a good measure of voter support for the proposed measure as it is today, on the natural. Because the Initial Ballot Test provides a gauge of natural support for the measure, it also serves a second purpose as a useful baseline from which to judge the impact of various information items conveyed later in the survey on voter support for the measure.

Question 5 Later this year, voters in Hermosa Beach may be asked to vote on a local ballot measure. Let me read you a summary of the measure. To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes; repairing aging infrastructure; keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response; police and crime prevention; shall City of Hermosa Beach's ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure?
FIGURE 8 INITIAL BALLOT TEST
Figure 8 presents the results of the Initial
Ballot Test among all respondents. Overall,
56% of likely November 2026 voters surveyed indicated that they would support the proposed one percent sales tax, whereas
35% stated that they would oppose the measure and approximately 10% were unsure or unwilling to share their vote choice. For general taxes in California, the level of support recorded at the Initial Ballot Test is approximately six percentage points above the simple majority (50%+1) required for passage.

Prefer not to
answer

0.3 Not sure

9.3 Definitely no

18.0 Probably no

16.5 Probably yes

29.0 Definitely yes

27.0

Initial Ballot Test
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 SUPPORT BY SUBGROUPS For the interested reader, Table 1 shows how support for the measure at the Initial Ballot Test varied by key demographic traits. The blue column (Approximate % of Universe) indicates the percentage of the likely November 2026 electorate that each subgroup category comprises. Support for the proposed measure was widespread, with nearly all demographic subgroups exhibiting support at or above a simple majority.

TABLE 1 DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN OF SUPPORT AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Approximate %
of Voter
Universe
% Probably or
Definitely Yes % Not sure
Overall 100.0 56.0 9.3
Less than 5 15.7 62.5 10.8
5 to 9 16.2 56.9 6.2
10 to 14 16.0 50.0 15.5
15 or more 52.0 55.5 7.8
Excellent, good 93.9 57.5 9.4
Fair, poor, very poor 6.1 31.6 6.5
Satisfied 83.1 61.4 9.3
Dissatisfied 16.9 29.5 10.4
Excellent, good 29.5 81.8 5.8
Fair 27.8 53.2 10.3
Poor, very poor 21.2 31.3 7.0
Not sure 21.5 48.9 15.4
18 to 29 13.0 72.1 6.9
30 to 39 15.3 49.6 15.3
40 to 49 17.6 57.2 9.3
50 to 64 29.5 54.3 7.3
65 or older 24.6 52.6 9.1
Democrat 46.7 62.4 8.8
Republican 22.6 50.9 8.4
Other / DTS 30.7 49.9 10.5
Single dem 26.6 61.2 9.8
Dual dem 10.5 67.3 8.0
Single rep 12.4 49.4 9.1
Dual rep 4.7 57.0 0.0
Other 22.4 51.3 9.0
Mixed 23.4 52.6 11.4
Yes 26.9 52.9 11.0
No 73.1 57.9 8.4
Since June 2016 33.5 61.9 7.9
Before June 2016 66.5 53.0 9.9
Yes 53.8 55.5 9.7
No 46.2 56.5 8.7
Yes 76.9 58.3 8.3
No 23.1 48.3 12.5
Yes 58.4 53.1 10.4
No 41.6 60.0 7.7
Yes 41.1 51.4 11.5
No 58.9 59.1 7.7
Male 50.1 60.1 8.3
Female 49.9 55.4 10.0
Household Party Type
Age
Years in Hermosa Beach
(Q1)
Fiscal Management
Rating (Q13)
Party
Quality of Life (Q2)
Overall Satisfaction (Q4)
Likely June 2026 Voter
Likely Low Turnout
Election Voter
Gender
Child in Hsld (Q14)
Registration Year
Homeowner on Voter File
Likely to Vote by Mail

Initial Ballot Test
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 REASONS FOR NOT SUPPORTING MEASURE Respondents who did not support the measure or were unsure at the Initial Ballot Test were subsequently asked if there was a particular reason for their position. Question 6 was asked in an open-ended manner, allowing respondents to mention any reason that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown in Figure 9.

Among the reasons offered for not supporting the measure, a perception that city funds have been/will be mismanaged or misspent was the most common (32%), followed by the belief that taxes are already too high (28%), a desire for more information about the measure (20%), and concerns about the economy, inflation, and cost of living (15%).

Question 6 Is there a particular reason why you do not support or are unsure about the measure I just described? FIGURE 9 REASONS FOR NOT SUPPORTING MEASURE

31.8 28.4

19.9 14.7

7.6 6.7

5.3 5.2

5.1 2.6

2.1 1.6

1.8 2.7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Money is misspent, mismanaged
Taxes already too high
Need more information
Economic, inflation, cost of living concerns
Other ways to be funded
It will hurt local economy
Do not trust City
City has enough money
Not sure / No particular reason
Lack of public oversight with general tax
Money will go to employee salaries, pensions
City services are okay as-is, no need for more money
Other higher priorities in community
Money should not go to law enforcement
% Respondents Who Do Not Support Measure

Projects & Services
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

P ROJECTS & S ERVICES
The ballot language presented in Question 5 indicated that the proposed sales tax measure would be used to provide funding for Hermosa Beach city services, such as paving streets and fixing potholes, repairing aging infrastructure, keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained, fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response, and police and crime prevention. The purpose of Question 7 was to provide respondents with a full range of projects and services that may be funded by the measure, and to identify which of these projects voters most favored funding with sales tax proceeds.

After reading each project or service that may be funded by the measure, respondents were asked if they would favor or oppose spending some of the money on that particular item assuming that the measure passes. Descriptions of the projects tested, as well as voters’ responses, are shown in Figure 10 below.4
Question 7 The measure we've been discussing will provide funding for a variety of services in your community. If the measure passes, would you favor or oppose using some of the money to:
_____, or do you not have an opinion?
FIGURE 10 PROJECTS & SERVICES
All projects and services tested were popular with Hermosa Beach voters, with more than twothirds of respondents indicating they would favor spending measure proceeds on each of the 12 items tested. That said, the services that resonated with the largest percentage of respondents keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained (91% strongly or somewhat favor), paving streets and fixing potholes (89%), maintaining city landscap4. For the full text of the services tested, turn to Question 7 in Questionnaires & Toplines on page 31.

65.6 55.9

43.9 46.0

48.2 56.9

54.4 54.6

47.1 44.6

40.4 30.1

25.0 33.0

41.2 38.1

35.0 25.5

26.1 22.8

27.1 27.5

31.7 37.9
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained
Pave streets and fix potholes
Maintain city landscaping and street trees
Repair or replace aging infrastructure
Repair and maintain the sewer and stormdrain system
Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies
Provide fire protection and paramedic services
Provide e-Bike enforcement
Provide police and crime prevention services
Address homelessness
Remove graffiti
Provide recreation programs for all ages
Q7c Q7a Q7l Q7b Q7k Q7e Q7d Q7h Q7f Q7g Q7i Q7j
% Respondents
Strongly favor Somewhat favor

Projects & Services
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ing and street trees (85%), repairing or replacing aging infrastructure (84%), repairing and maintaining the sewer and stormdrain system (83%), and providing quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies (82%).

SERVICE RATINGS BY INITIAL SUPPORT Table 2 presents the top five services (based on the percentage of respondents who strongly favor each) by position at the Initial Ballot Test.

Not surprisingly, individuals who initially opposed the measure were generally less likely to favor spending money on a given service when compared with supporters. Nevertheless, initial supporters, opponents, and the undecided did agree on three of the top five priorities for funding.

TABLE 2 TOP PROJECTS & SERVICES BY POSITION AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Position at
Initial Ballot
Test (Q5) Item Project/Service Summary
% Strongly
Favor
Q7c Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and wellmaintained 83 Q7e Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies 71
Q7d Provide fire protection and paramedic services 71
Q7a Pave streets and fix potholes 68
Q7b Repair or replace aging infrastructure 62
Q7h Provide e-Bike enforcement 46
Q7a Pave streets and fix potholes 38
Q7c Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and wellmaintained 38 Q7e Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies 34
Q7k Repair and maintain the sewer and stormdrain system 32 Q7c Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and wellmaintained 68 Q7e Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies 59
Q7a Pave streets and fix potholes 50
Q7f Provide police and crime prevention services 50
Q7d Provide fire protection and paramedic services 48
Probably or
Definitely Yes
(n = 290)
Probably or
Definitely No
(n = 179)
Not Sure
(n = 48)

Positive Arguments
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

P OSITIVE A RGUMENTS
If the City chooses to place a measure on an upcoming ballot, voters will be exposed to various arguments about the measure in the ensuing months. Proponents of the measure will present arguments to try to persuade voters to support a measure, just as opponents may present arguments to achieve the opposite goal. For this study to be a reliable gauge of voter support for the proposed sales tax measure, it is important that the survey simulate the type of discussion and debate that will occur prior to the vote taking place and identify how this information ultimately shapes voters’ opinions about the measure.

The objective of Question 8 was thus to present respondents with arguments in favor of the proposed measure and identify whether they felt the arguments were convincing reasons to support it. Arguments in opposition to the measure were also presented and are discussed later in this report (see Negative Arguments on page 21). Within each series, specific arguments were administered in random order to avoid a systematic position bias.

Question 8 What I'd like to do now is tell you what some people are saying about the measure we've been discussing. Supporters of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to SUPPORT the measure? FIGURE 11 POSITIVE ARGUMENTS

39.3 30.5

32.8 32.7

32.3 32.0

29.1 27.2

22.9 35.5

43.5 39.9

35.9 36.0

35.0 33.9

34.8 32.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County
By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live
City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent
City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become Fast response times for 911 calls critical for saving lives; measure will ensure that we have enough police officers, firefighters, paramedics to respond quickly to 911 emergencies Measure will cost just $1 for every $100 purchased; food, medicine, many other essential items are excluded from tax Measure includes a clear system of accountability incl citizen oversight, independent audits, public disclosure of how all funds are spent
Measure makes good financial sense; most of money raised by sales tax comes from people who visit, pass through Hermosa Beach, but don’t live here
Q8b Q8c Q8e Q8d Q8h Q8f Q8i Q8a Q8g
% Respondents
Very convincing Somewhat convincing

Positive Arguments
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Figure 11 presents the truncated positive arguments tested, as well as voters’ reactions to the arguments. The arguments are sorted from most convincing to least convincing based on the percentage of respondents who indicated that the argument was either a ‘very convincing’ or ‘somewhat convincing’ reason to support the measure. Using this methodology, the most compelling positive arguments were: All money raised by the measure will stay local to fund essential services and facilities here in Hermosa Beach. By law, it can't be taken away by the State or the County (75% very or somewhat convincing), By keeping our city safe, clean and well-maintained, this measure will help protect our quality of life and keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live (74%), and The City maintains 47 miles of streets, 70 miles of sidewalks, and 112 acres of beaches, parks and playfields. This measure provides the funding we need to keep our streets, infrastructure, and parks in good condition (73%).

TOP POSITIVE ARGUMENTS BY INITIAL SUPPORT Table 3 on the next page lists the top five most convincing positive arguments (based on the percentage of respondents who cited it as very convincing) according to respondents’ vote choice at the Initial Ballot Test. The most striking pattern in the table is that the positive arguments resonated with a much higher percentage of voters who were initially inclined to support the measure when compared to voters who initially opposed the measure or were unsure. Nevertheless, three specific arguments were ranked among the top five most compelling by supporters, opponents, and the undecided.

Positive Arguments
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 TABLE 3 TOP POSITIVE ARGUMENTS BY POSITION AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Position at
Initial Ballot
Test (Q5) Item Positive Argument Summary
% Very
Convincing
Q8b All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County 54 Q8e
City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition
49 Q8f
Fast response times for 911 calls critical for saving lives; measure will ensure that we have enough police officers, firefighters, paramedics to respond quickly to 911 emergencies
49 Q8d
Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent
49 Q8h
City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become
47 Q8b All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County 16 Q8c By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live 11
Q8h
City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become
11 Q8d
Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent
11 Q8g Measure makes good financial sense; most of money raised by sales tax comes from people who visit, pass through Hermosa Beach, but don’t live here 10 Q8b All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County 32 Q8h
City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become
24 Q8e
City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition
21 Q8c By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live 20
Q8d
Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent
19 Probably or
Definitely Yes
(n = 290)
Probably or
Definitely No
(n = 179)
Not Sure
(n = 48)

Interim Ballot Test
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

I NTERIM B ALLOT T EST
After exposing respondents to projects and services that could be funded by the measure as well as the types of positive arguments voters may encounter during an election cycle, the survey again presented respondents with the ballot language used previously to gauge how support for the proposed sales tax measure may have changed. As shown in Figure 12, overall support among likely November 2026 voters increased to 62%, with 29% of voters indicating that they would definitely vote yes on the measure. Approximately 30% of respondents opposed the measure at this point in the survey, and an additional 9% were unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice.

Question 9 Sometimes people change their mind about a measure once they have more information about it. Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it again. To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes; repairing aging infrastructure; keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response; police and crime prevention; shall City of Hermosa Beach's ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? FIGURE 12 INTERIM BALLOT TEST
SUPPORT BY SUBGROUPS Table 4 on the next page shows how support for the measure at this point in the survey varied by key voter subgroups, as well as the percentage change in subgroup support when compared with the Initial Ballot Test. Positive differences appear in green, whereas negative differences appear in red. Support for the proposed sales tax measure increased or decreased by moderate amounts (five percentage points or more) between the Initial and Interim Ballot Tests for many subgroups, with the largest net changes in support exhibited by those who rated the City’s fiscal management as fair (+10%), voters under the age of 30 (+10%), those who have resided in Hermosa Beach less than five years (+9%), and voters age 40 to 49 (+8%).

Definitely yes

29.3 Probably yes

32.2 Probably no

14.5 Definitely no

15.4 Not sure

8.2 Prefer not to
answer

0.3

Interim Ballot Test
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 TABLE 4 DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN OF SUPPORT AT INTERIM BALLOT TEST Approximate %
of Voter
Universe
% Probably or
Definitely Yes
Change From
Initial Ballot
Test (Q5)
Overall 100.0 61.6 +5.6
Less than 5 15.7 71.6 +9.1
5 to 9 16.2 62.2 +5.3
10 to 14 16.0 54.4 +4.5
15 or more 52.0 60.5 +5.0
Excellent, good 93.9 63.8 +6.3
Fair, poor, very poor 6.1 27.1 -4.6
Satisfied 83.1 68.3 +6.9
Dissatisfied 16.9 30.3 +0.8
Excellent, good 29.5 85.0 +3.1
Fair 27.8 63.6 +10.4
Poor, very poor 21.2 31.9 +0.6
Not sure 21.5 56.2 +7.2
18 to 29 13.0 81.7 +9.6
30 to 39 15.3 56.3 +6.7
40 to 49 17.6 65.1 +7.9
50 to 64 29.5 58.7 +4.4
65 or older 24.6 55.1 +2.5
Democrat 46.7 69.8 +7.4
Republican 22.6 53.4 +2.5
Other / DTS 30.7 55.1 +5.2
Single dem 26.6 68.6 +7.4
Dual dem 10.5 71.9 +4.6
Single rep 12.4 53.8 +4.4
Dual rep 4.7 57.0 No change
Other 22.4 55.3 +3.9
Mixed 23.4 60.0 +7.4
Yes 26.9 59.6 +6.7
No 73.1 62.9 +5.1
Since June 2016 33.5 66.6 +4.7
Before June 2016 66.5 59.0 +6.0
Yes 53.8 60.0 +4.5
No 46.2 63.4 +6.9
Yes 76.9 63.5 +5.2
No 23.1 55.2 +6.9
Yes 58.4 57.6 +4.5
No 41.6 67.1 +7.1
Yes 41.1 55.4 +4.0
No 58.9 65.9 +6.8
Male 50.1 64.6 +4.6
Female 49.9 62.2 +6.8
Years in Hermosa Beach
(Q1)
Quality of Life (Q2)
Overall Satisfaction (Q4)
Fiscal Management
Rating (Q13)
Age
Party
Household Party Type
Child in Hsld (Q14)
Likely Low Turnout
Election Voter
Gender
Registration Year
Homeowner on Voter File
Likely to Vote by Mail
Likely June 2026 Voter

Negative Arguments
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

N EGATIVE A RGUMENTS
Whereas Question 8 presented respondents with arguments in favor of the measure, Question 10 presented respondents with arguments designed to elicit opposition to the measure. In the case of Question 10, however, respondents were asked if they felt that the argument was a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to oppose the measure. The arguments tested, as well as voters’ opinions about the arguments, are presented in Figure 13.

Question 10 Next, let me tell you what opponents of the measure are saying. Opponents of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to OPPOSE the measure?
FIGURE 13 NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS
Among the negative arguments tested, the most compelling were: Residents and local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, and cost of living increases. Many are struggling to stay afloat. Now is not the time to raise taxes (73% very or somewhat convincing), Everyone is coming after us for tax increases - including state and county taxes, school bonds, and other taxes that will be on the ballot this year. Enough is enough. We can't afford to keep raising our taxes (70%), and There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, which means the City can divert the money to pet projects without any say from voters. We can't trust the City with our tax dollars. They will mismanage the money (68%).

TOP NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS BY INITIAL SUPPORT Table 5 on the next page ranks the top five negative arguments (based on % very convincing) according to respondents’ vote choice at the Initial Ballot Test.

37.9 35.7

31.7 31.3

33.2 34.8

34.7 36.0

31.1 27.2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes
There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from
voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money
City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time
This tax will last forever. It will never expire
Q10a Q10c Q10b Q10d2 Q10d1
% Respondents
Very convincing Somewhat convincing

Negative Arguments
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 TABLE 5 NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS BY POSITION AT INITIAL BALLOT TEST Position at
Initial Ballot
Test (Q5) Item Negative Argument Summary
% Very
Convincing
Q10a
Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes
25 Q10d1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire 23 Q10b
There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money
21 Q10c
Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes
20 Q10d2 City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time 20
Q10a
Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes
61 Q10c
Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes
60 Q10d2 City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time 53
Q10d1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire 52 Q10b
There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money
47 Q10c
Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes
39 Q10d1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire 35 Q10a
Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes
34 Q10b
There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money
34 Q10d2 City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time 6
Probably or
Definitely Yes
(n = 290)
Probably or
Definitely No
(n = 179)
Not Sure
(n = 48)

Final Ballot Test
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

F INAL B ALLOT T EST
Voters’ opinions about ballot measures are often not rigid, especially when the amount of information presented to the public on a measure has been limited. An important goal of the survey was thus to gauge how voters’ opinions about the proposed measure may be affected by the information they could encounter during the course of an election cycle. After providing respondents with the wording of the proposed measure, projects and services that could be funded, and arguments in favor of and against the proposal, the survey again asked voters whether they would vote ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on the proposed sales tax measure.

Question 11 Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it one more time. To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as paving streets and fixing potholes; repairing aging infrastructure; keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained; fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response; police and crime prevention; shall City of Hermosa Beach's ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? FIGURE 14 FINAL BALLOT TEST
At this point in the survey, support for the measure was found among 55% of likely November 2026 voters surveyed, with 27% indicating they would definitely support the measure. Approximately 33% of respondents opposed the measure at the Final Ballot Test, and 12% were unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice.

Prefer not to
answer
Not sure 1.2

10.8 Definitely no

16.8 Probably no

16.0 Probably yes

28.0 Definitely yes

27.1

Change in Support
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

C HANGE IN S UPPORT
Table 6 provides a closer look at how support for the proposed measure changed over the course of the survey by calculating the difference in support between the Initial, Interim, and Final Ballot Tests within subgroups of voters. The percentage of support for the measure at the Final Ballot Test is shown in the column with the heading % Probably or Definitely Yes. The columns to the right show the difference between the Final and the Initial, and the Final and Interim Ballot Tests. Positive differences appear in green, and negative differences appear in red.

TABLE 6 DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN OF SUPPORT AT FINAL BALLOT TEST As expected, voters generally responded to the negative arguments with a reduction in their support for the sales tax measure when compared with the levels recorded at the Interim Ballot Test.

The general trend over the course of the entire survey (Initial to Final Ballot Test) was one of stability, averaging -0.8% across all subgroups. With this slight movement, support for the proApproximate % of Voter
Universe
% Probably or
Definitely Yes
Change From
Initial Ballot
Test (Q5)
Change From
Interim Ballot
Test (Q9)
Overall 100.0 55.2 -0.8 -6.4
Less than 5 15.7 63.1 +0.6 -8.5
5 to 9 16.2 57.5 +0.6 -4.7
10 to 14 16.0 47.8 -2.2 -6.6
15 or more 52.0 54.4 -1.0 -6.0
Excellent, good 93.9 57.8 +0.3 -6.0
Fair, poor, very poor 6.1 13.8 -17.9 -13.3
Satisfied 83.1 61.1 -0.2 -7.1
Dissatisfied 16.9 28.0 -1.4 -2.2
Excellent, good 29.5 81.7 -0.1 -3.3
Fair 27.8 53.2 -0.0 -10.5
Poor, very poor 21.2 28.5 -2.8 -3.5
Not sure 21.5 48.7 -0.3 -7.5
18 to 29 13.0 81.7 +9.6 No change
30 to 39 15.3 50.1 +0.5 -6.2
40 to 49 17.6 59.0 +1.8 -6.1
50 to 64 29.5 49.8 -4.5 -9.0
65 or older 24.6 48.1 -4.5 -7.0
Democrat 46.7 63.3 +0.9 -6.5
Republican 22.6 47.3 -3.6 -6.1
Other / DTS 30.7 48.6 -1.3 -6.4
Single dem 26.6 61.9 +0.7 -6.7
Dual dem 10.5 68.3 +1.0 -3.6
Single rep 12.4 46.2 -3.2 -7.6
Dual rep 4.7 53.8 -3.2 -3.2
Other 22.4 49.0 -2.3 -6.3
Mixed 23.4 52.6 -0.0 -7.5
Yes 26.9 54.2 +1.3 -5.4
No 73.1 56.6 -1.3 -6.3
Since June 2016 33.5 62.7 +0.9 -3.9
Before June 2016 66.5 51.4 -1.6 -7.7
Yes 53.8 53.1 -2.4 -6.9
No 46.2 57.6 +1.1 -5.8
Yes 76.9 57.2 -1.1 -6.3
No 23.1 48.4 +0.1 -6.7
Yes 58.4 50.4 -2.7 -7.2
No 41.6 61.9 +1.9 -5.2
Yes 41.1 48.2 -3.2 -7.2
No 58.9 60.0 +0.9 -5.8
Male 50.1 58.9 -1.1 -5.7
Female 49.9 54.2 -1.2 -7.9
Years in Hermosa Beach
(Q1)
Quality of Life (Q2)
Overall Satisfaction (Q4)
Fiscal Management
Rating (Q13)
Age
Party
Household Party Type
Child in Hsld (Q14)
Likely Low Turnout
Election Voter
Gender
Registration Year
Homeowner on Voter File
Likely to Vote by Mail
Likely June 2026 Voter

Change in Support
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 posed sales tax measure at the Final Ballot Test (55%) remained five percentage points above the simple majority (50%+1) required for passage.

Whereas Table 6 displays changes in support for the measure over the course of the interview at the subgroup level, Table 7 displays the individual-level changes that occurred between the Initial and Final Ballot Tests for the measure. On the left side of the table is shown each of the response options to the Initial Ballot Test and the percentage of respondents in each group. The cells in the body of the table depict movement within each response group (row) based on the information provided throughout the course of the survey as recorded by the Final Ballot Test.

For example, in the first row we see that of the 27.0% of respondents who indicated that they would definitely support the measure at the Initial Ballot Test, 21.7% also indicated they would definitely support the measure at the Final Ballot Test. Approximately 4.0% moved to the probably support group, 0.4% moved to the probably oppose group, 0.4% moved to the definitely oppose group, and 0.5% stated they were now unsure of their vote choice.

To ease interpretation of the table, the cells are color coded. Red shaded cells indicate declining support, green shaded cells indicate increasing support, whereas white cells indicate no movement. Moreover, within the cells, a white font indicates a fundamental change in the vote: from yes to no, no to yes, or not sure to either yes or no.

TABLE 7 MOVEMENT BETWEEN INITIAL & FINAL BALLOT TEST
As one might expect, the information conveyed in the survey had the greatest impact on individuals who either weren’t sure about how they would vote at the Initial Ballot Test or were tentative in their vote choice (probably yes or probably no). Moreover, Table 7 makes clear that although the information did impact some voters, it did not do so in a consistent way for all respondents.

Some respondents found the information conveyed during the course of the interview to be a reason to become more supportive of the measure, whereas a similar percentage found the same information reason to be less supportive. Despite 15% of respondents making a fundamental5 shift in their opinion about the measure over the course of the interview, the net impact is that support for the measure at the Final Ballot Test (55%) was just one percentage point different than support at the Initial Ballot Test (56%).

5. This is, they changed from a position of support, opposition, or undecided at the Initial Ballot Test to a different position at the Final Ballot Test.

Definitely
support
Probably
support
Probably
oppose
Definitely
oppose Not sure
Definitely support 27.0% 21.7% 4.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5%
Probably support 29.0% 5.4% 19.1% 2.0% 0.0% 2.5%
Probably oppose 16.5% 0.0% 1.8% 9.6% 2.5% 2.6%
Definitely oppose 18.0% 0.0% 1.3% 3.2% 13.5% 0.0%
Not sure 9.6% 0.0% 2.0% 0.8% 0.4% 6.5%
Initial Ballot Test (Q5)
Final Ballot Test (Q11)

Final Ballot Test at Lower Rate
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 F INAL B ALLOT T EST AT L OWER R ATE The ballot language tested throughout the survey indicated that the measure would increase the local sales tax rate by one percent and be used to fund general city services. Voters who did not support the proposed measure at the Final Ballot Test (Question 11) were subsequently asked if they would support the measure if the rate were set at a lower amount: one-half percent.

As shown in Figure 15, lowering the tax rate to one-half percent generated a modest amount of additional support for the proposed measure. An additional 7% of voters indicated they would support the measure if the tax rate were lowered to one-half percent, although nearly all of the additional support for the measure was ‘soft’ (i.e., probably yes).

Question 12 What if the measure I just described raised the sales tax by a lower amount: onehalf percent? Would you vote yes or no on the measure? FIGURE 15 FINAL BALLOT TEST LOWER AMOUNT Prefer not to
answer

1.4 Not sure

9.7 Definitely no

13.8 Probably no

12.2 Probably yes

7.2 Definitely yes

0.5 Yes @ 1% (Q11)

55.2

Background & Demographics
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 B ACKGROUND & D EMOGRAPHICS TABLE 8 DEMOGRAPHICS OF SAMPLE In addition to questions directly related to the proposed measure, the study collected basic demographic information about respondents and their households. Some of this information was gathered
during the interview, although much of it was collected from the voter file. The profile of the likely November 2026 voter sample represented in this
report is shown in Table 8.

Total Respondents 519
Years in Hermosa Beach (Q1)
Less than 5 15.7
5 to 9 16.2
10 to 14 16.0
15 or more 52.0
Prefer not to answer 0.1
Child in Hsld (Q14)
Yes 26.3
No 71.7
Prefer not to answer 1.9
Gender
Male 47.8
Female 47.7
Non-binary 0.8
Prefer not to answer 3.7
Party
Democrat 46.7
Republican 22.6
Other / DTS 30.7
Age
18 to 29 13.0
30 to 39 15.3
40 to 49 17.6
50 to 64 29.5
65 or older 24.6
Registration Year
Since June 2016 33.5
Before June 2016 66.5
Household Party Type
Single dem 26.6
Dual dem 10.5
Single rep 12.4
Dual rep 4.7
Other 22.4
Mixed 23.4
Homeowner on Voter File
Yes 53.8
No 46.2
Likely to Vote by Mail
Yes 76.9
No 23.1
Likely Jun 2026 Voter
Yes 58.4
No 41.6
Likely Low Turnout Election Voter
Yes 41.1
No 58.9

Methodology
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

M ETHODOLOGY
The following sections outline the methodology used in the study, as well as the motivation for using certain techniques.

QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT Dr. McLarney of True North Research worked closely with the City to develop a questionnaire that covered the topics of interest and avoided possible sources of systematic measurement error, including position-order effects, wording effects, response-category effects, scaling effects, and priming. Several questions included multiple individual items. Because asking the items in a set order can lead to a systematic position bias in responses, items were asked in random order for each respondent.

Some of the questions asked in this study were presented only to a subset of respondents. For example, only individuals who did not support the sales tax or were unsure at the Initial Ballot Test (Question 5) were asked to describe the reason for their position (Question 6). In some cases, two versions of a question were tested to identify how wording differences impact perceptions of the item. In such cases, half of the sample received the item with version 1 wording (e.g., Question 10, item D1) and the other half received version 2 (e.g., Question 10, item D2).

The questionnaire included with this report (see Questionnaires & Toplines on page 31) identifies the skip patterns and programming instructions used in the survey to ensure each respondent received the appropriate questions.

PROGRAMMING & PRE-TEST Prior to fielding the survey, the questionnaire was CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) programmed to assist interviewers when conducting telephone interviews. The CATI program automatically navigates skip patterns, randomizes the appropriate question items, and alerts the interviewer to certain types of keypunching mistakes should they occur. The survey was also programmed into a passcode-protected online survey application to allow online participation for sampled voters. The integrity of the questionnaire was pre-tested internally by True North and by dialing into voter households in the City prior to formally beginning the survey.

SAMPLE The survey was administered to a stratified and clustered random sample of registered voters in the City who are likely to participate in the November 2026 general election, with a subset who are also likely to participate in the lower-turnout June 2026 primary. Consistent with the profile of this universe, the sample was stratified into clusters, each representing a combination of age, gender, and household party type. Individuals were then randomly selected based on their profile into an appropriate cluster. This method ensures that if a person of a particular profile refuses to participate, they are replaced by an individual who shares their same profile.

STATISTICAL MARGIN OF ERROR By using the probability-based sampling design noted above, True North ensured that the final sample was representative of voters in the City who are likely to participate in the November 2026 general election. The results of the survey can thus be used to estimate the opinions of all voters likely to participate in said election.

Because not all voters participated in the study, however, the results have what is known as a statistical margin of error due to sampling. The margin of error refers to the difference between what was found in the survey of 519 voters for a particular question and what would have been

Methodology
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 found if all of the estimated 11,560 likely November 2026 voters identified in the City had been surveyed for the study.

Figure 16 provides a graphic plot of the maximum margin of error in this study. The maximum margin of error for a dichotomous percentage result occurs when the answers are evenly split such that 50% provide one response and 50% provide the alternative response. For this survey, the maximum margin of error is ± 4.2%.

FIGURE 16 MAXIMUM MARGIN OF ERROR DUE TO SAMPLING
Within this report, figures and tables show how responses to certain questions varied by subgroups such as age, gender, and partisan affiliation. Figure 16 is thus useful for understanding how the maximum margin of error for a percentage estimate will grow as the number of individuals asked a question (or in a particular subgroup) shrinks. Because the margin of error grows exponentially as the sample size decreases, the reader should use caution when generalizing and interpreting the results for small subgroups.

RECRUITING & DATA COLLECTION The survey followed a mixed-method design that employed multiple recruiting methods (telephone, text, and email) and multiple data collection methods (telephone and online). Telephone interviews averaged 16 minutes in length and were conducted during weekday evenings (5:30PM to 9PM) and on weekends (10AM to 5PM). It is standard practice not to call during the day on weekdays because most working adults are unavailable and thus calling during those hours would likely bias the sample.

Voters recruited via email and text were assigned a unique passcode to ensure that only voters who received an invitation could access the online survey site, and that each voter could complete the survey only one time. During the data collection period, email reminder notices were also sent to encourage participation among those who had yet to take the survey. A total of 519 surveys were completed between April 16 and April 23, 2026. 519 Respondents
± 4.2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Sample Size (Number of Respondents)
Margin of Error

Methodology
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 DATA PROCESSING Data processing consisted of checking the data for errors or inconsistencies, coding and recoding responses, weighting, and preparing frequency analyses and crosstabulations.

ROUNDING Numbers that end in 0.5 or higher are rounded up to the nearest whole number, whereas numbers that end in 0.4 or lower are rounded down to the nearest whole number.

These same rounding rules are also applied, when needed, to arrive at numbers that include a decimal place in constructing figures and tables. Occasionally, these rounding rules lead to small discrepancies in the first decimal place when comparing tables and charts for a given question.

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Q UESTIONNAIRES & T OPLINES

True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 1 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Feasibility Survey Final Toplines (n= 519) April 2026 Section 1: Introduction to Study Hi, may I please speak to _____. My name is _____, and I’m calling from TNR on behalf of the City of Hermosa (her-MOW-suh) Beach. We’re conducting a confidential survey of voters about important issues in the city and I’d like to get your opinions.

If needed: This is a survey about important issues in your community. I’m NOT trying to sell anything and I won’t ask for a donation.

If needed: The survey should take about 12 minutes to complete.

If needed: If now is not a convenient time, can you let me know a better time so I can call back?
If the person asks why you need to speak to the listed person or if they ask to participate instead, explain: For statistical purposes, at this time the survey must only be completed by this particular individual. Section 2: Quality of Life
& City Services
I’d like to begin by asking you a few questions about what it is like to live in Hermosa Beach.

Q1 How long have you lived in Hermosa Beach?
1 Less than 1 year 3%
2 1 to 4 years 13%
3 5 to 9 years 16%
4 10 to 14 years 16%
5 15 years or longer 52%
99 Prefer not to answer 0%
Q2 How would you rate the overall quality of life in Hermosa Beach? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor?
1 Excellent 49%
2 Good 45%
3 Fair 5%
4 Poor 0%
5 Very poor 1%
98 Not sure 0%
99 Prefer not to answer 0%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 2
Q3
If the city government could change one thing to make Hermosa Beach a better place to live now and in the future, what change would you like to see? Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below.

Address parking issues 11%
Address E-bike issues 11%
Not sure / Cannot think of anything specific 10%
Clean up, beautify City 7%
Address homeless issues 6%
Enforce traffic laws 5%
Limit growth, development 5%
Support small, local businesses 5%
No changes needed / Everything is fine 5%
Improve infrastructure, streets, roads 4%
Enforce city codes 4%
Put utilities underground 4%
Provide more bike lane connections, separate
from walking paths 4%
Improve fiscal management, budgeting 4%
Provide a community pool 4%
Provide a dog park, dog beach 4%
Improve public safety 3%
Improve parks, rec facilities 3%
Provide more police presence, response 3%
Fix, improve the pier 3%
Enforce noise ordinance 3%
Reduce traffic congestion 2%
Provide more affordable housing 2%
Reduce taxes, fees 2%
Improve public transportation 2%
Improve shopping, dining opportunities 2%
Provide rec activities, events for all ages 2%
Improve City Council, Gov process 2%
Address rent control issue 2%
Fix, upgrade rundown, empty buildings 2%
Reduce building permit restrictions 2%
Improve pedestrian safety, crossings 2%
Do not allow dogs on beach 2%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 3
Q4
Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Hermosa Beach is doing to provide city services? Get answer, then ask: Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? 1 Very satisfied 31%
2 Somewhat satisfied 48%
3 Somewhat dissatisfied 12%
4 Very dissatisfied 4%
98 Not sure 4%
99 Prefer not to answer 0%
Section 3: Initial Ballot Test
Later this year, voters in Hermosa Beach may be asked to vote on a local ballot measure. Let me read you a summary of the measure.

Q5
To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as:  Paving streets and fixing potholes  Repairing aging infrastructure  Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and wellmaintained  Fire protection, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response  Police and crime prevention shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 27% Skip to Q7
2 Probably yes 29% Skip to Q7
3 Probably no 16% Ask Q6
4 Definitely no 18% Ask Q6
98 Not sure 9% Ask Q6
99 Prefer not to answer 0% Skip to Q7
Q6
Is there a particular reason why you do not support or are unsure about the measure I just described? If yes, ask: Please briefly describe your reason. Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below.

Money is misspent, mismanaged 32%
Taxes already too high 28%
Need more information 20%
Economic, inflation, cost of living concerns 15%
Other ways to be funded 8%
It will hurt local economy 7%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 4
City has enough money 5%
Do not trust City 5%
Not sure / No particular reason 5%
Lack of public oversight with general tax 3%
Money will go to employee salaries, pensions 3%
City services are okay as-is, no need for more
money
2%
Other higher priorities in community 2%
Money should not go to law enforcement 2%
Section 4: Projects & Services
Q7
The measure we’ve been discussing will provide funding for a variety of services in your community.

If the measure passes, would you favor or oppose using some of the money to: _____, or do you not have an opinion? Get answer, if favor or oppose, then ask: Would that be strongly (favor/oppose) or somewhat (favor/oppose)?
Randomize.

Strongly
favor
Somewhat
favor
Somewhat
oppose
Strongly
oppose
No sure
Prefer not
to answer
A Pave streets and fix potholes 56% 33% 4% 3% 3% 1%
B Repair or replace aging infrastructure 46% 38% 3% 3% 7% 2% C Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public
facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained 66% 25% 2% 2% 3% 2% D Provide fire protection and paramedic
services 54% 26% 5% 6% 6% 2%
E Provide quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies 57% 25% 3% 5% 7% 3% F Provide police and crime prevention services 47% 27% 10% 8% 6% 2% G Address homelessness 45% 28% 9% 8% 9% 2%
H Provide e-Bike enforcement 55% 23% 9% 7% 6% 1%
I Remove graffiti 40% 32% 11% 6% 9% 2%
J Provide recreation programs for all ages 30% 38% 13% 9% 8% 2% K Repair and maintain the sewer and
stormdrain system 48% 35% 5% 3% 7% 2%
L Maintain city landscaping and street trees 44% 41% 5% 4% 4% 2%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 5 Section 5: Positive Arguments What I’d like to do now is tell you what some people are saying about the measure we’ve been discussing.

Q8 Supporters of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to SUPPORT the measure? Randomize
Very
convincing
Somewhat
convincing
Not at all
convincing
Don’ t
believe
Not sure
Prefer not
to answer
A
The measure includes a clear system of
accountability including citizen oversight,
independent audits, and public disclosure of
how all funds are spent.
27% 35% 12% 19% 6% 2%
B
All money raised by the measure will stay
local to fund essential services and facilities
here in Hermosa Beach. By law, it can’t be
taken away by the State or the County.
39% 35% 9% 11% 4% 2%
C
By keeping our city safe, clean and wellmaintained, this measure will help protect our quality of life and keep Hermosa Beach a
special place to live.
31% 44% 12% 8% 4% 2%
D
Most of the sales tax generated locally goes
to the State of California or Los Angeles
County. This measure ensures that a higher
percentage of our sales tax dollars will stay
here in Hermosa Beach and we have local
control over how those funds are spent.
33% 36% 14% 12% 4% 2%
E
The City maintains 47 miles of streets, 70
miles of sidewalks, and 112 acres of beaches,
parks and playfields. This measure provides
the funding we need to keep our streets,
infrastructure, and parks in good condition.
33% 40% 13% 9% 4% 2%
F
Fast emergency response times for 9-1-1 calls
are critical for saving lives. This measure will
ensure that we have enough police officers,
firefighters, and paramedics to respond
quickly to 9-1-1 emergencies.
32% 35% 13% 13% 5% 2%
G
This measure makes good financial sense.

Most of the money raised by the sales tax
comes from people who visit or pass through
Hermosa Beach, but don’t live here.
23% 32% 18% 22% 2% 2%
H
The City has more than 220 million dollars in
unfunded street and infrastructure projects
that need to be completed. The longer we
wait to fix our streets, infrastructure, and
facilities, the more expensive it will become.
32% 36% 14% 12% 4% 2%
I
This measure will cost just 1 dollar for every
100 dollars purchased. And food, medicine,
and many other essential items are excluded
from the tax.
29% 34% 21% 10% 4% 3%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 6 Section 6: Interim Ballot Test Sometimes people change their mind about a measure once they have more information about it. Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it again.

Q9
To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as:  Paving streets and fixing potholes  Repairing aging infrastructure  Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and wellmaintained  Fire protection, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response  Police and crime prevention shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 29%
2 Probably yes 32%
3 Probably no 15%
4 Definitely no 15%
98 Not sure 8%
99 Prefer not to answer 0%
Section 7: Negative Arguments
Next, let me tell you what opponents of the measure are saying.

Q10 Opponents of the measure say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to OPPOSE the measure? Randomize. Split Sample D1/D2
Very
convincing
Somewhat
convincing
Not at all
convincing
Don’ t
believe
Not sure
Prefer not to
answer
A
Residents and local businesses have been hit
hard by inflation, high interest rates, and cost
of living increases. Many are struggling to
stay afloat. Now is not the time to raise taxes.
38% 35% 16% 4% 4% 3%
B
There are no guarantees on how funds will be
spent, which means the City can divert the
money to pet projects without any say from
voters. We can’t trust the City with our tax
dollars. They will mismanage the money.
32% 36% 16% 8% 5% 4%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 7
C
Everyone is coming after us for tax increases
– including state and county taxes, school
bonds, and other taxes that will be on the
ballot this year. Enough is enough. We can’t
afford to keep raising our taxes.
36% 35% 17% 5% 5% 3%
D1 This tax will last forever. It will never expire. 33% 27% 16% 13% 7% 3% D2
The City tried to increase the sales tax twice
in recent years, and twice the voters said NO.

Rather than listening to voters, the City is
trying it a third time.
31% 31% 23% 3% 8% 4%
Section 8: Final Ballot Test
Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it one more time.

Q11
To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as:  Paving streets and fixing potholes  Repairing aging infrastructure  Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and wellmaintained  Fire protection, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response  Police and crime prevention shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 27% Skip to Q13
2 Probably yes 28% Skip to Q13
3 Probably no 16% Ask Q12
4 Definitely no 17% Ask Q12
98 Not sure 11% Ask Q12
99 Prefer not to answer 1% Skip to Q13
Q12
What if the measure I just described raised the sales tax by a lower amount: one-half percent? Would you vote yes or no on the measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)?
Yes @ 1% (Q11) 55%
1 Definitely yes 0%
2 Probably yes 7%
3 Probably no 12%
4 Definitely no 14%
98 Not sure 10%
99 Prefer not to answer 1%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 8 Section 9: Background & Demographics Thank you so much for your participation. I have just two background questions for statistical purposes.

Q13 In your opinion, has the City of Hermosa Beach done an excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor job of managing its financial resources?
1 Excellent 3%
2 Good 26%
3 Fair 27%
4 Poor 13%
5 Very poor 8%
98 Not sure 21%
99 Prefer not to answer 1%
Q14 Do you have children under the age of 18 living in your household? 1 Yes 26%
2 No 72%
99 Prefer not to answer 2%
Those are all of the questions that I have for you. Thanks so much for participating in this important survey.

Post-Interview & Sample Items
S1 Gender
1 Male 48%
2 Female 48%
3 Non-binary 1%
4 Prefer not to answer 4%
S2 Party
1 Democrat 47%
2 Republican 23%
3 Other 8%
4 DTS 23%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 9
S3 Age on Voter File
1 18 to 29 13%
2 30 to 39 15%
3 40 to 49 18%
4 50 to 64 30%
5 65 or older 25%
S4 Registration Date
1 Since Nov 2020 16%
2 Jun 2016 to before Nov 2020 17%
3 Jun 2012 to before Jun 2016 9%
4 Before June 2012 58%
S5 Household Party Type
1 Single Dem 27%
2 Dual Dem 11%
3 Single Rep 12%
4 Dual Rep 5%
5 Single Other 15%
6 Dual Other 7%
7 Dem & Rep 5%
8 Dem & Other 12%
9 Rep & Other 4%
0 Mixed (Dem + Rep + Other) 2%
S6 Homeowner on Voter File
1 Yes 54%
2 No 46%
S7 Likely to Vote by Mail
1 Yes 77%
2 No 23%

Questionnaires & Toplines
City of Hermosa Beach True North Research, Inc. © 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 City of Hermosa Beach Baseline Sales Tax Survey April 2026 True North Research, Inc. © 2026 Page 10
S8 Likely November 2026 Voter
1 Yes 100%
2 No 0%
S9 Likely June 2026 Voter
1 Yes 58%
2 No 42%
S10 Likely Low Turnout Election Voter
1 Yes 41%
2 No 59%

5/26/2026

REVENUE MEASURE STUDY

CONDUCTED FOR THE

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

PRESENTED BY
TIMOTHY MCLARNEY PH.D.

2 oDetermine if a local sales tax measure is feasible
o Identify how to create a measure consistent with
community priorities
oGather information needed for communications &
outreach

PURPOSE OF STUDY

3 o How did we select voters to survey?
o Stratified & Clustered Random Sample of likely November 2026 voters using age, gender, partisanship, household party type, and sub-geographies
o Ensures balanced, representative sample of likely voters o How did we recruit participation?
o Personalized email, text, and telephone calls
o PINs to restrict access and ensure one complete per respondent o How were voters able to share their opinions?
o Secure, PIN-protected website that scales to the device o Telephone (land line or mobile)
o April 16th to April 23rd, 2026
o What was the sample size?
o 519 completed interviews
oOverall margin of error of ± 4.2% @ 95% level of confidence

METHODOLOGY OF STUDY

4 QUALITY OF LIFE
Not sure

0.1 Very poor
Poor 0.6

0.3 Fair

5.2 Good

45.0 Excellent

48.7

5 CHANGES TO IMPROVE CITY

11.3 11.1

10.2 7.1

6.0 5.3

5.0 5.0

4.9 4.3

3.9 3.7

3.6 3.5

3.4 3.3

3.2 2.9

2.6 2.4

2.3 2.1

2.1 2.0

2.0 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.7 1.8

3.9 4.5

2.1 0 5 10 15
Address parking issues
Address E-bike issues
Not sure / Cannot think of anything specific
Clean up, beautify City
Address homeless issues
Limit growth, development
No changes needed / Everything is fine
Support small, local businesses
Enforce traffic laws
Improve fiscal management, budgeting
Provide more bike lane connections, separate from walking paths Enforce city codes
Put utilities underground
Provide a community pool
Provide a dog park, dog beach
Improve infrastructure, streets, roads
Improve public safety
Fix, improve the pier
Provide more police presence, response
Improve parks, rec facilities
Enforce noise ordinance
Provide rec activities, events for all ages
Do not allow dogs on beach
Provide more affordable housing
Reduce taxes, fees
Fix, upgrade rundown, empty buildings
Reduce traffic congestion
Improve pedestrian safety, crossings
Reduce building permit restrictions
Improve City Council, Gov process
Improve shopping, dining opportunities
Address rent control issue
Improve public transportation
% Respondents

6 OVERALL SATISFACTION
Very satisfied

31.1 Somewhat
satisfied

48.2 Somewhat
dissatisfied

12.1 Very
dissatisfied

4.0 Not sure

4.1 Prefer not to
answer

0.5

7 INITIAL BALLOT TEST
To provide funding for city services in Hermosa Beach, such as:
o Paving streets and fixing potholes
o Repairing aging infrastructure
o Keeping streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained
o Fire protection, paramedic, and 911 emergency response o Police and crime prevention
shall City of Hermosa Beach’s ordinance establishing a 1% sales tax be adopted, providing approximately 4 million dollars annually for general city services until ended by voters, with independent audits, citizen oversight, and all money locally controlled? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure?

8 INITIAL BALLOT TEST
Prefer not to
answer

0.3 Not sure

9.3 Definitely no

18.0 Probably no

16.5 Probably yes

29.0 Definitely yes

27.0 56% 34%

9 PROJECTS & SERVICES

65.6 55.9

43.9 46.0

48.2 56.9

54.4 54.6

47.1 44.6

40.4 30.1

25.0 33.0

41.2 38.1

35.0 25.5

26.1 22.8

27.1 27.5

31.7 37.9
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Keep streets, parks, playgrounds and public facilities safe, clean, and well-maintained
Pave streets and fix potholes
Maintain city landscaping and street trees
Repair or replace aging infrastructure
Repair and maintain the sewer and stormdrain system
Provide quick responses to 911 emergencies
Provide fire protection and paramedic services
Provide e-Bike enforcement
Provide police and crime prevention services
Address homelessness
Remove graffiti
Provide recreation programs for all ages
% Respondents
Strongly favor Somewhat favor

10 POSITIVE ARGUMENTS

39.3 30.5

32.8 32.7

32.3 32.0

29.1 27.2

22.9 35.5

43.5 39.9

35.9 36.0

35.0 33.9

34.8 32.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
All money raised by measure will stay local to fund essential services, facilities here in Hermosa Beach; by law, it can’t be taken away by State or County
By keeping city safe, clean, well-maintained, measure will help protect quality of life, keep Hermosa Beach a special place to live City maintains 47 mi of streets, 70 mi of sidewalks, 112 acres of beaches, parks, playfields; measure provides funding we need to keep streets, infrastructure, parks in good condition
Most of sales tax goes to State, County; measure ensures higher percentage of sales tax dollars stay here in Hermosa Beach, we have local control over how those funds are spent
City has $220M+ in unfunded street, infrastructure projects that need to be completed; the longer we wait to fix streets, infrastructure, facilities, the more expensive it will become
Fast response times for 911 calls critical for saving lives; measure will ensure that we have enough police officers, firefighters, paramedics to respond quickly to 911 emergencies
Measure will cost just $1 for every $100 purchased; food, medicine, many other essential items are excluded from tax
Measure includes a clear system of accountability incl citizen oversight, independent audits, public disclosure of how all funds are spent
Measure makes good financial sense; most of money raised by sales tax comes from people who visit, pass through Hermosa Beach, but don’t live here
% Respondents
Very convincing Somewhat convincing

11 INTERIM BALLOT TEST
Definitely yes

29.3 Probably yes

32.2 Probably no

14.5 Definitely no

15.4 Not sure

8.2 Prefer not to
answer

0.3 62%
30%

12 NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS

37.9 35.7

31.7 31.3

33.2 34.8

34.7 36.0

31.1 27.2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Residents, local businesses have been hit hard by inflation, high interest rates, cost of living increases; many are struggling to stay afloat; now is not the time to raise taxes Everyone is coming after us for tax increases, incl state, county taxes, school bonds, other taxes that will be on ballot this yr; enough is enough; we can’t afford to keep raising taxes
There are no guarantees on how funds will be spent, City can divert money to pet projects without any say from
voters; we can’t trust City with tax dollars; they will mismanage money
City tried to increase sales tax twice in recent yrs, twice voters said NO; rather than listening to voters, City is trying it a third time
This tax will last forever. It will never expire
% Respondents
Very convincing Somewhat convincing

13 FINAL BALLOT TEST
Prefer not to
answer

1.2 Not sure

10.8 Definitely no

16.8 Probably no

16.0 Probably yes

28.0 Definitely yes

27.1 55% 33%

14 FINAL BALLOT TEST AT HALF CENT RATE
Prefer not to
answer

1.4 Not sure

9.7 Definitely no

13.8 Probably no

12.2 Probably yes

7.2 Definitely yes

0.5 Yes @ 1% (Q11)

55.2

15 KEY CONCLUSIONS
o Does a local sales tax measure appear to be feasible for November 2026? Yes.

Positive Signs
o Voters value the quality of life in Hermosa Beach and the services they receive from the City, but also see room for improvements o Sufficient natural support for measure to fund city services (56%) o Popular projects and services
o Positive arguments resonate
o All ballot tests are above the simple majority (50%+1) required for passage of general tax, even after opposition arguments Challenges & External Factors
o Receptiveness to potential opposition arguments (-7%) o Electoral climate: Hyper-partisanship
o (Un)knowns: Trajectory of war, fuel prices, economy, tariffs, inflation, and competing measures

16 o Snapshot in time, not a crystal ball
o Service Priorities: Public works and public safety.
o City Communications: Begin a conversation with the community to build awareness of ongoing needs, unfunded capital
improvements/deferred maintenance, and consensus on a
proposal.
o Independent Campaign: Need to have solid independent
campaign to navigate through the election cycle, communicate key messages, turn out supporters, and weather uncertainties.

OBSERVATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 








 !
"#$%
&'
 !()*#$%+,-
(!-./
012 34
56 789 %
9#! 
& %# +:$-;
<$!:(,=.>
9 % $
&! %$+:$-;
<$!:(,=.
?
* #@
A$#
,-

A-
'
 !()*#$%+,-
(!-(
B$
#
C:% ; -'
#
D
EF

GHIJKLMN
JO GPQ

HJRKSPIHTKL

ENOIHJUVEMPN

WEIXHJEQLOEIXY
ZEKN
[J\MQ
EIL\P
H]E RTHNQJLOEIXTGERJFF\KTHN
EGPH^H]J\L
DHTKX
H]TG ]LMN
QP_EH MP
GFEKN`
MTXPN
FJGH`
QJL [KPIG
DXKJ[
TH]PRJFF\KTHN
GE H]P [J\MQ
KPSI
HEXP ]TI
QJL^Ga
HJ
KP UH]PEMI QN
bTGHKL

QJ OEIXG
TKH]PcJ\H]
dEN KQFEKN
QJLPbOIHG
ELIP`
EGQJDYa
d\H
PSKTUJKPG H] QJLOEIX G K GPH`
]Pe\GHTJK
GfEH[] RJGgf
c\UTRP
HJGENH] DGIJKLMN
EIP
[TH] Pf[]N
FEKNKPTL]_JIG
EPRJKPI Qf
GRHTJK
UH]PUMNI
[ RTSQY
hMGJ`
H]PUMNI
GEN H]POIJ GPQ

EI TG IPMHTSPMN
\KGPQ
OJIHTK
UH]P
OEIXY
hG JFPKP
[]JSTGH
]POEIXPSIN
QE`DREKGNH] KJOEIHJU]POEIXTGIPMEHTSPMN
\KGPQ`
MEGH
JUEMH]POIJ GPQ
EI Y
DKQP
H]I
TGLJQG]ETKL
H]PI`
_\H]PI
TGMHP
OEIXTKL`
EMJU[]TR

GEMFJGH
PKTIMN
JR\OTPQ

EMIPQNY
D
H]TKX
H]PR\IPKH
_EMKRP
_H[ K
QJL [KPIGi
\PJUH]POEIX KQJH]PIGi
\PJUH]POEIXTG]LMN
G\RP U\M
[TH]_J LIJ\OG
SPIN
IPGORHU\M
J H]PJ IGi

RJKPIGY

DHEXPFNQJLH VEMPN

WEIXPSIN
QE KQ]ESPK I
[THKPG Q

EKN PLEHTSP

KHIERTJKG
_PH[ K
QJL
[KPIG
EKQJH]PIGY
jSPKH]J\L
DQPITS
LIEH
SM\P
UIJF
H]P
OEIX GT`DUPMGJ HIKLMN
H]E QJLOEIXTGEQPHITFPKH
J ]POEIX
EKQ
H]PRTHN]E D[J\MQ
OIPU
E \MPJUK QLGEH]POEIX H MIH]P

EK SP QJLOEIXY
kURJ\IGP

FNGHIJKL

OIPU KR
TGHJ
GTFOMN
PES
H] OEIX GTYcTKRPIMN`WEHITRX
lJKMPNmno
WJIHP
pEKP

City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026
Ecomment Report
Agenda Item Name Comment
Position Attachment
URL
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR027 Todd Tullis When these policy & fee changes were reviewed by the Commission (April 16 2026), the RCS fee study showing that special event costs exceeded revenues by ~$350k had yet to be made public. During the Commission meeting we were assured by Staff that these changes would result in the city covering its costs, though no specifics of estimating methodology were shared. Given the magnitude of the subsidy being provided is now known, I hope that Staff can "show their work" around cost estimation for Special Events so that the public and Council have confidence that these new fee amounts will recover city costs.

For
FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS-061
Todd Tullis I encourage the Council to work "big to small" - by this I mean to start with the highest dollar items first - when directing action or making decisions on the available revenue options. Specifically regarding TOT/Short Term Rentals I hope Council can ensure there are lawful and resident-friendly operational limits and that the city can collect its share of taxes from these stays that are likely to increase in frequency.

For

City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026
Ecomment Report
AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PROJECT ANALYSIS AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY YARD PROJECT -26-PW-025 Ira Ellman In January of this year, the City Council made the decision to spend $565K for Owners Representative Services over four years related to the City Yard. This was a poor decision without determining how Hermosa Beach would pay the required estimated $20mm remediation and construction costs. In that January meeting, the City Manager said that raising meter and citation rates would create a new revenue stream and not our intention to program those in the next budget, but to have those set aside to extent possible to fund this. I dont believe that is the case, as these incremental revenue streams, along with creative accounting, are what is being used to balance the 2026-2027 Budget. Now, staff are proposing spending an additional $574K on City Yard CEQA and environmental services. With the current difficult financial situation the city faces, it continues to be increasingly obvious that no additional funds should be invested in the City Yard until funding the project is resolved.

Against
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR027 tonyhiggins Please click/tap on pdf above
Against
https://pubhermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/FileStream.ashx?DocumentId=58399

City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026
Ecomment Report
AWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN. - 26-CMO-032 Richard G I am opposed to this contract award. this topic has been well addressed in the 'Local Hazard Mitigation Plan' of 2017. At most, Staff can be directed to update that excellent report. Besides, an earthquake that destroys our infrastructure is our more likely doom scenario.

Against

City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026
Ecomment Report
AWARD OF CONTRACT TO MOFFAT & NICHOL FOR PREPARATION OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION PLAN. - 26-CMO-032 Tracy H AGAINST
Sea Level Rise (SLR) adaptation planning requires strong justificationparticularly when recent scientific updates question the extremes of both high- and low-end projections that often drive such plans.https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/2627/2026/Hermosa Beach is confronting significant fiscal strain, with City Council budget sessions projecting a **$3.2 million structural general-fund deficit** for FY 2027 and a cumulative five-year shortfall approaching $19.3 million. One-time measures (pandemic aid, vacancy savings, deferred spending) have been exhausted, prompting discussions of departmental cuts, fee increases, and other difficult choices to protect core services. In this context, a nearly $474,000 three-year commitment (through April 30, 2029) for sea level rise adaptation planning requires strong justificationparticularly when recent scientific updates question the extremes of both high- and low-end projections that often drive such plans. ### Questionable Scientific Foundation: Implausible High-End and Inconsistent Low-End Projections The **European Geosciences Union** (EGU) *Geoscientific Model Development* (2026) paper on the ScenarioMIP-CMIP7 framework highlights important limitations in prior scenarios used for climate planning. Specifically:
- **High-end projections**: CMIP6 high-emission scenarios like **SSP5-8.5** (and its predecessor RCP8.5) "have become implausible" due to trends in renewable energy costs, policy developments, and recent emissions data. The new CMIP7 scenarios narrow the high end, with forcings expected below previous extreme levels.- **Low-end projections**: "At the low end, many CMIP6 emission trajectories have become inconsistent with observed trends during the 20202030 period." This indicates that aggressive low-emission pathways assumed in earlier modeling often do not align with real-world developments in the current decade.These findings underscore that extreme scenariosboth very high and very lowat the tails of previous projections lack strong plausibility or consistency with observed data. Many coastal adaptation plans, including those influencing California communities, have leaned on upper-bound sea level rise estimates tied to high-emission pathways to justify expansive (and costly) measures. Relying on such assumptions now risks over-preparing for low-likelihood outcomes while underweighting more central, plausible trajectories. The paper stresses designing scenarios within a "wide and plausible range," prioritizing internal consistency and realism over legacy extremes.For Hermosa Beach, this calls for **prudent recalibration**: Focus on robust, no-regrets strategies (e.g., enhanced beach management, drainage improvements) based on updated, moderate projections rather than committing substantial funds to plans potentially anchored in outdated high-end assumptions.### Moffatt & Nichol: Suboptimal Fit Amid Fiscal ConstraintsMoffatt & Nichol brings strong expertise in large-scale port, harbor, and regional transportation infrastructure projects. However, this orientation is less ideal for a compact, primarily residential beach community like Hermosa, where adaptation needs center on localized issues such as wave run-up, groundwater intrusion, minor flooding, and recreational beach preservation. Their portfolio skews toward major engineering endeavors that could produce recommendations disproportionate to the city's scale and budget realities.With structural deficits projected and core services under pressure, outsourcing to a firm geared toward bigger-ticket solutions increases the chance of over-scoped outcomes. Hermosa has conducted prior climate-related assessments; layering on another comprehensive plan at this price point duplicates effort when resources are needed elsewhere.### Recommendations - **Re-scope or pause** the contract to incorporate the latest CMIP7-aligned science and limit scope to essential, cost-effective updates. - Prioritize monitoring of actual local sea level and erosion trends over speculative long-term modeling.- Explore lower-cost alternatives: academic collaborations, state resources, or targeted engineering studies focused on proven resilience measures.- Align any planning with fiscal disciplinedefer non-urgent expenditures until the structural budget gap is addressed sustainably.Awarding this contract now would commit significant funds (and staff time) amid documented deficits for planning that should be grounded in the most current, plausible science. The EGU/GMD analysis provides clear rationale for caution on both high- and low-end extremes, reinforcing the need for evidence-based restraint in Hermosa Beach's current fiscal climate. Council should prioritize core services and flexible, adaptive management over this expenditure.Source Assistance: AI Against
ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD045 Stacy Straus, Srour & Associates
To Hermosa Beach City Council,I am in support of the proposed changes to Administrative Procedures being presented to you. As a regular representative of applications for residential and commercial development in the City of Hermosa Beach, it is encouraging to see the proposed changes, as they create clarity, allow transparency, they will save time for an applicant, and mostly they allow for predictability, which applicants need as they consider investing in this City.

I attended a session with Planning Manager Oropeza where I was able to ask questions about the proposed changes, give comments and get and give clarification. Ms. Oropeza had a command of the Muni Code, was able to address my comments and questions, made changes in the draft proposal regarding the detailed implementation questions and she took into account my concerns. I hope we have your support in making the changes to the City procedure that will give applicants the direction, clarity and transparency they need when considering development in Hermosa Beach. I am available for questions or discussion as well. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stacy Straus For

City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026
Ecomment Report
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL EVENT POLICY GUIDE AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR027 Laura Pena Dear City Council -
I appreciate the effort to improve clarity and administrative efficiency in the Special Event Policy Guide. I believe this item should be viewed as more than a permit guide update. It is also an economic and fiscal policy decision.The Citys fee study shows that Community Resources recovers only 47.3% of its costs overall, and that Special Event Permit activity recovers only about 14.8% of cost. In dollar terms, that is roughly $60,000 in special event revenue against $405,896 in cost, and $1.368 million in Community Resources revenue against $2.895 million in cost. That level of under-recovery is harder to justify in the current fiscal environment.Cost RecoveryThe staff report says the proposed fees are intended to support improved cost recovery. But some of the proposed fees appear much closer to symbolic charges than true cost recovery.For example, the proposed policy sets: Long Term Agreement (LTA) application fees at $485 commercial and $291 nonprofit Reserved Parking Staging at $207 Event Modification at $114 Public Hearing at $38 plus publication costsBut the fee study shows materially higher documented costs: LTA cost: $8,784 Reserved Parking Staging cost: $542 Event Modification cost: $527 Public Hearing cost: $176 The LTA example is especially important. Even at the fee studys 35% recovery benchmark, the multi-year agreement fee would be $1,902 for commercial events and $1,141 for nonprofits. Instead, the proposed fees are $485 and $291. The proposed commercial LTA fee appears to recover only about 5.5% of the Citys documented cost, not 35%.I understand from Commissioner feedback that when this item was before the Commission on April 16th, the fee study results were not yet public and the estimating methodology was not shared.I also think there is an important local business equity issue here. I am concerned about the difference between the subsidies being effectively provided to sponsors and participants within large special events versus the fee burden placed on our small businesses trying to do modest activations. For example, the fee study shows a co-sponsor fee of $356 per sponsor within the special event program, while the Temporary Minor Special Event fee in the Citys permit structure is $1,900, with a $335 date change fee. That creates the impression that a local business trying to do small activations may be paying far more than a sponsor participating within a larger event ecosystem.LTA FrameworkI am concerned about the proposed LTA framework. It is too thin. The draft reduces eligibility to only one threshold, that an event has been held in our City for at least three consecutive years, and limits obligations to a post-event presentation focused on attendance, community impacts, and successes and challenges. Longevity alone should not be enough to justify recurring priority access to public space and City resources. LTAs should also demonstrate measurable economic value, operational reliability, and a clear public return.

The City has the most leverage at the front end of these negotiations. If staff enters into LTA negotiations without specific deliverables such as local business activation, measurable economic reporting, cost recovery expectations, and compliance standards, we may not be setting these agreements up as true win-win arrangements.Peak Season Limits CitywideWhat problem are we actually trying to solve? If the answer is administrative ease, I do not believe that alone is a sufficient reason to impose citywide limits if that could unintentionally constrain smaller events that may better serve different parts of the City or support local businesses in a more targeted way.Hybrid Pricing ModelI would also encourage consideration of a simpler hybrid pricing model rather than relying too heavily on symbolic fee levels. A framework with a minimum base fee, actual cost billing for City services, and a revenue share above a threshold may better protect the City while still allowing event producers to benefit when events perform well. I support a stronger special events program. But if we want events to contribute to revenue generation, the policy must do more than organize the process. It must be tied to measurable public value.

I appreciate your consideration. Against
ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD045 Jon David PDF attache
For
https://pubhermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/FileStream.ashx?DocumentId=58537

City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026
Ecomment Report
ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD045 Nancy Schwappach
Please see attached pdf
For
https://pubhermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/FileStream.ashx?DocumentId=58538 ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD045 Laura Pena Dear City Council,
Thank you for creating meaningful opportunities for public feedback during the Zoning Code Update Administrative process. For those of us following these updates closely, these forums have been valuable because they allowed the public focused feedback before items reach Council. I recommend the City provide more communication about these open forums so they can engage a wider audience.The few items I would like to address lead to a broader question for Council: How does the City define success for the Administrative Procedures updates?In my view, the update is successful if compliant projects move faster, staff spends less time on avoidable process, businesses can open and improve their spaces more predictably, mixed-use housing moves from application to completion, and the City grows recurring revenue without relying only on new taxes and fees.How the City defines and publicly reports that success will matter. If residents, businesses, applicants, and investors can see that our City is improving review timelines, reducing bottlenecks, and providing more predictable service, it will increase trust and signal better quality services.I respectfully recommend the following refinements:1. Strengthen the Purpose section.The Purpose section supports orderly growth and economic development, but it does not yet connect the Administrative Procedures to measurable service outcomes. I recommend adding language stating that the zoning procedures are intended to promote timely, predictable, consolidated, and measurable review of housing, business, and development applications.This matters because zoning administration affects economic development, housing production, business openings, commercial reinvestment, and fiscal sustainability.2. Define compatible in Section 17.04.040 Definitions.I support using compatibility as an approval finding. However, because the term appears throughout the entitlement chapters, it should be clearly defined in the definitions section.Compatibility should mean the ability of a use or project to coexist with surrounding uses based on identifiable physical and operational factors such as scale, setbacks, access, parking, noise, lighting, odor, hours of operation, and other measurable impacts. It should not mean that a project must be identical to its surroundings, universally popular, or free from controversy.3. Allow Director level minor modifications for late-night establishments and outdoor uses when the change does not intensify the use or expand floor area. Outdoor dining, patios, retail display, and active frontages are important to our commercial vitality. A blanket exclusion could make it harder for businesses to make practical improvements, accessibility upgrades, safety changes, or layout adjustments even when no new impacts are created.4. Remove Section 17.03.110(C)(3) from Revocation of Permits.As proposed, this provision would allow a permit to be revoked if the approved use or activity has been suspended or dormant for more than 12 consecutive months. I respectfully recommend removing this provision. A valid permit should not be vulnerable to revocation simply because a use has been inactive for 12 months. Vacancies and delays are often caused by factors outside the control of the property owner or operator, including tenant turnover, financing, insurance, construction delays, Coastal Commission review, plan check, lease negotiations, utility upgrades, market conditions, or broader economic uncertainty.This language could unintentionally penalize property owners who are actively trying to lease, improve, finance, permit, or reactivate a space. It may also reduce the value of existing entitlements, discourage tenant improvements, complicate financing, and make investors more hesitant to take on vacant or underutilized commercial properties.5. Create a tiered Parking Plan process.Routine parking plans for small commercial spaces, changes of use, shared parking, restriping, managed parking, or modest parking adjustments should be reviewed administratively when objective criteria are met. Larger or policy level parking requests should remain with the Planning Commission.These refinements would make the code more business supportive while still protecting residents and public accountability.I appreciate the work staff has done to improve the Administrative Procedures. I encourage Council to support the update, while asking staff to define success clearly, measure outcomes publicly, and make these refinements so these procedures become a stronger economic and public service process.

As always I appreciate your consideration For

City Council Regular Meeting - May 26, 2026
Ecomment Report
ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD045 Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce
Dear City Council and Mayor,On behalf of Hermosa Beachs business community, the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce appreciates the Citys work to modernize the Administrative Procedures section of the Zoning Code.We support the overall goal of creating a more timely, predictable, and measurable review process for business and development applications. Clearer procedures, stronger administrative review pathways, and more consistent decision making are important steps toward supporting local businesses, property reinvestment, tenant improvements, and long term economic vitality.As the City considers adoption, we respectfully recommend three targeted refinements to better protect businesses and encourage investment.1. Section 17.03.100(A) Minor ModificationsAs proposed, the Director would not be able to approve minor revisions for late-night establishments or outdoor uses, even when the change does not intensify the use or expand approved floor area.We recommend removing this blanket exclusion. Outdoor dining, retail displays, patios, and active frontages are important to our commercial vitality. Businesses should be able to make modest, non-intensifying changes administratively. A more balanced approach would allow Director approval when the change remains consistent with the original approval and conditions.Remove Section 17.03.110(C)(3) from Revocation of Permits.As proposed, this provision would allow a permit to be revoked if the approved use or activity has been suspended or dormant for more than 12 consecutive months, as demonstrated by any form of evidence or documentation. I respectfully recommend removing this provision. A valid permit should not be vulnerable to revocation simply because a use has been inactive for 12 months. Vacancies and delays are often caused by factors outside the control of the property owner or operator, including tenant turnover, financing, insurance, construction delays, Coastal Commission review, plan check, lease negotiations, utility upgrades, market conditions, or broader economic uncertainty.This language could unintentionally penalize property owners who are actively trying to lease, improve, finance, permit, or reactivate a space. It may also reduce the value of existing entitlements, discourage tenant improvements, complicate financing, and make investors more hesitant to take on vacant or underutilized commercial properties.The City already has authority to revoke or modify permits when conditions are violated, laws are violated, approvals were obtained by fraud, the use creates a nuisance, or the permit is being exercised contrary to its terms. Those provisions appropriately focus on actual harm, noncompliance, or misuse not inactivity alone.3. Section 17.72.030 Parking Plan Review AuthorityAs written, all Parking Plans would be reviewed by the Planning Commission. We recommend creating a tiered process.Routine Parking Plans for small downtown lots, changes of use in existing buildings, shared parking, restriping, managed parking, or modest parking adjustments should be eligible for Director level review when objective criteria are met.Planning Commission review should be reserved for major parking reductions, large new development, removal of public parking, or unresolved policy issues.Parking is one of the biggest barriers to reinvestment in older commercial buildings. If every parking solution requires a public hearing, the process may discourage tenant improvements, adaptive reuse, storefront activation, and business expansion. A tiered approach would still protect parking availability while making it easier for businesses to improve and activate commercial spaces.Recommended Council DirectionThe Chamber respectfully requests that City Council support the Administrative Procedures update with direction to staff to:
1Allow Director level minor modifications for late-night establishments and outdoor uses when the change does not intensify the use or create new impacts;2Remove this language altogether - no revocation of permits based on dormancy;3Create a tiered Parking Plan process with Director review for routine small-scale parking requests and Planning Commission review for major or policy level requests;4Track outcomes such as review timelines, administrative approvals, Planning Commission hearings avoided, tenant improvements, business openings, and commercial vacancy trends.

Our business community supports thoughtful regulation and public accountability. But the process should also be practical, proportional, and predictable. These refinements would help the City protect neighborhoods while supporting business investment, commercial vitality, and long term fiscal health.Thank you. Hermosa chamber of Commerce and Business Advocacy Commitee.

Against

5/26/26
Agenda Item 11(a)
Hello Council and Staff.

My comment relates specifically to community reach-out and feedback.

I have not been following this so cannot comment on the substance of the changes.

However, I am encouraged to see the efforts to streamline matters as our City continues its efforts to make life easier for its residents and business owners, and not harder. I also appreciate this in the context of the fee discussions. I firmly believe if we are not able to recover fully for this type of activity, before raising fees we need to evaluate processes and, where we can, lower costs. So, thank you for this.

Meanwhile, I am grateful the City has renewed its efforts to be transparent and engage with the community in a meaningful way. For example, during hearings about last year’s Builder’s Remedy application, the Planning Department did a great job of keeping residents and other stakeholders informed, by tracking email addresses of those who submitted comments or other feedback, and reaching out directly when, for example, hearing dates were extended. We very much appreciated that courtesy and those efforts.

In that vein, I applaud the recent three “Drop-in Office Hours” but understand they were sparsely attended. I don’t know what efforts were made to publicize those meetings but, it seems, similar outreach would have been great. Maybe it was done but apparently there were up to 14 prior “study sessions and discussion meetings” with Economic Development “stakeholders.” Presumably anyone who participated in those prior meetings, or commented at earlier hearings, were informed of the Drop-In opportunities.

Other means to publicize these events, and maybe these were done, I am just not aware, are through the email subscription list of upcoming City meetings, the City Manager report at Council meetings and the Staff Report at relevant Commission meetings.

Again, I am grateful for the increased engagement and desire for robust community feedback on matters which impact us and encourage those efforts be enhanced wherever possible. And maybe all these, or similar, publicity measures were undertaken and folks were just so happy with the changes they did not feel the need to comment! Thank you for your service.

Best, Nancy Schwappach

I support this ordinance. After more than 40 years without a comprehensive update to the City’s zoning procedures, this effort is long overdue, and I appreciate the years of work by staff, the Planning Commission, and the many stakeholders who contributed to getting it here.

That said, I believe a few targeted refinements would make this a substantially stronger ordinance — one that better serves residents, property owners, and small businesses – – and that matches the spirit of the City’s own stated goals of timely, predictable, and measurable permitting.

1. Precise Development Plans for Code-Compliant Housing and Mixed-Use Projects
I support staff recommendations to create a “Minor PDP” that routes condos and small mixed-use in a more appropriate process. Currently every condo and every mixed-use project in Hermosa Beach — regardless of size, and regardless of whether it fully complies with city code — is required to obtain a “Major” Precise Development Plan.

This means a staff report, a public hearing before the Planning Commission, applicant fees, and months of added delay, even when the project raises no policy questions and deviates from nothing in the code. This adds a negative impact to all parties with no positive effect.

The data speaks for itself. Over the last 24 months, the Planning Commission has not once denied a code-compliant Condo/Mixed-use PDP. I can not count how many times I have heard Pete Hoffman say at a Planning Commission hearing “It checks all the boxes. We can’t deny it.”
A guaranteed delay with a predetermined outcome is not oversight. It is process burden imposed on residents and property owners who have already done everything the City asked of them.

Recommendation: Follow staff recommendation that condos and mixed-use projects that meet 100% of objective standards and seek no variance or deviation are approved at the Director-level. Full appeal rights to the Planning Commission are preserved, but a mandatory public hearing for a project that complies with everything in the code is not appropriate. If the code is objective, the review should be administrative.

2. Dormancy-Based Permit Revocation Should Be Struck All-together The proposed ordinance would allow a permit to be revoked if a use has been dormant for more than 12 consecutive months. I am asking the Council to strike this provision entirely.

Most people view a vacant storefront as a problem to be solved. I’d ask Council to consider a different frame: almost every vacant commercial space in this city is actively going through something. Cleaning up. Finding a tenant. Pulling permits. Waiting on the Coastal Commission. Negotiating a lease. Working through financing. Managing insurance or ADA compliance issues. The transition is rarely visible from the street — but that does not mean it isn’t happening.

Consider the Becker building, which many of you know. Don English had tenants and wanted to make a transition that should have been straightforward. But once the project entered the regulatory process — Planning Commission routing, solar requirements, and California ADA elevator requirements — each layer added months. What should have been a manageable transition became years of vacancy. That building was not abandoned. It was stuck. And no revocation clock would have helped — it would only have added pressure and uncertainty to an owner already navigating a complex system.

Furthermore, tenanting a commercial property is a completely different animal to residential property. Lenders and investors build extended vacancy periods into every deal they underwrite. Standard lease-up assumptions are 6 to 12 months for office, 8 to 12-plus months for retail, and 12 to 24 months for stabilized occupancy in new or significantly vacant buildings. These are not failure scenarios — they are normal market transitions. When commercial properties are finally tenanted, the leases are typically 5-10yrs, or longer, so getting the right tenant is important.

The answer to vacancy is not a penalty. The answer is a system that allows smoother transitions.

The City already has code enforcement tools to address genuinely abandoned or nuisance properties. A new dormancy-based revocation trigger is not needed for that purpose — and its reach goes well beyond it.

Recommendation: Strike §17.03.110(C)(3) in its entirety.

3. Parking Plans — Create a Tiered Review Process
As written, all Parking Plans are reviewed by the Planning Commission. This is disproportionate and discourages reinvestment in small local events, and older, small commercial buildings where parking is already one of the biggest barriers to tenant improvements, adaptive reuse, and storefront activation.

A small downtown lot with eight parking spaces is not a policy question. It is arithmetic.

Routing that kind of routine adjustment through a Planning Commission hearing adds months of delay and cost to projects that need neither.

Recommendation: Establish a tiered Parking Plan process. Director-level review should be available for routine plans: restriping, shared parking arrangements, small changes of use, modest parking adjustments, and managed parking for smaller events and commercial lots. Planning Commission review should be reserved for major parking reductions, large new development, removal of public parking, or situations involving unresolved policy questions. This preserves Commission oversight where it genuinely matters while removing unnecessary process burden from straightforward cases.

Entitlement Expiration — Allow Exercise of Permit
Entitlements can expire before financing is secured, before Coastal Commission review is complete, or before plan check and tenant improvement work can commence. For applicants who are diligently pursuing a project, this can mean going back through a full

hearing for an approval that everyone agreed was appropriate — just because the timeline slipped due to factors outside their control. I recommend adding an “Exercise of Permit” provision for substantially unchanged approvals where the applicant can demonstrate diligent pursuit. An exercised permit should not require construction commencement as its only metric of progress.

I hope my comments are helpful and considered seriously. Other than one item (revocation due to dormancy) I strongly support staff recommendations, with minor tweaks. The refinements I have outlined are not objections to the overall effort in any way but an invitation to go a little further and match the level of review to the level of judgment actually required. A streamlined, predictable process is a win for all stakeholders!
Best Regards
Jon David

Dear City Council.

Dear Director Nichols
Director Nichols said in her 5/12/26 budget presentation related to taxpayer subsidies and program costs that:

Our proposed budget reflects a strong position for a Parks and Recreation Department, recovering about 77% of the department costs...

This would seem to be a mathematical impossibility.

PARKS & REC FYE26 BUDGET
$2,536,857
77% RECOVERY:
2,536,857 x 77%= $1,952,602.

UNRECOVERED Costs & Subsidies ACCORDING TO Director Nichols 77% calculation:
2,536,857 - $1,952,602 = $584,255
UNRECOVERED P&R SUBSIDIES ACCORDING TO RCS:
$1,526,319
RCS Spreadsheet:

Thats a million dollar per year discrepancy that needs a better explanation.

So is it $584,255 or $1,526,319 in unrecovered costs & subsidies? Director Nichols also said in her 5/12 budget presentation that:

Additionally, we do have ONE program that's currently operating at a deficit. It is our Park After School program.

By my count, looking at the RCS spreadsheet above its not ONE program operating at a deficit; its 12 of the 14 Programs and a cumulative deficit of $1,526,319 I hope the public gets a better independently verified analysis of Director Nichols costsubsidy recovery facts, figures & plans before approving any new fees in the Special Events Policy Guide.

Its also reasonable we get an independent audit of the taxpayer subsidies the Parks & dept will accrue over the next 3 years for each of the 14 items in the spread sheet above.

I leave you with a question. The Parks & Rec have $1.526 million dollars a year in taxpayer subsidies currently.

With your new fee schedule how much of the ~1.526 million in Park Department Subsidies are targeted for recovery for each of the next 3 years for the 14 major programs listed above.

And while some Parks and Rec Subsidies may be justified eg a portion of the Theatre Costs or day care for low to moderate income residents, how much in subsidies should go to non-residents?
Shouldn't the council specifically authorize amount of each subsidy and if the that target cant be met get the city out of that business?
Every subsidized dollar recovered reduces the General Fund budget deficit by a dollar and I hope the city address this squarely before coming hat in hand asking for a sales tax increase.

Thank you for considering
tonyhiggins

1 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 12, 2026
5:00 p.m.

Council Chambers
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Members Present: Mayor Mike Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Michael D. Keegan, Councilmember Ray Jackson, Councilmember Dean Francois, Councilmember Rob Saemann
Staff Present: City Manager Steve Napolitano, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker, City Clerk Martha Alvarez, Interim Deputy City Clerk Ariana
Rodriguez, Community Development Director Alison Becker, Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols, Public Works Director Joe SanClemente, Police Chief Landon Phillips
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM
Mayor Detoy called the Closed Session meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.

2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call.

Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann

Absent: Councilmember Francois
Councilmember Francois arrived at 5:05 p.m.

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
• Jim Holtz (In-Person)
Councilmember Francois arrived at the City Council meeting at 5:05 p.m.

Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

2 City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call.

Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann

4. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:05 p.m.

4.a MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on April 14, 2026

4.b CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL (EXISTING LITIGATION) California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Koerner v. City of Hermosa Beach
Case Number: 25STCP00891
Name of Case: Everett Faulk v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, et al
Case Number: 24STCP04022

4.c PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT / EMPLOYMENT / EVALUATION /

DISCIPLINE / DISMISSAL / RELEASE
California Government Code section 54957
Title: Direction regarding personnel matters including application of memoranda of understanding, and personnel rules related to displacement and reemployment rights.

4.d CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
California Government Code section 54957.6
City Negotiator: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager Organizations: Professional and Administrative Employee Group and Teamsters, Professional and Medical Employees’ Union, Local 986

5. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Mayor Detoy called the Open Session to order at 6:04 p.m.

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by County of Los Angeles Fire Department (LACoFD), Assistant Fire Chief, Brian Kane.

7. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call.

3 Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann

8. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore reported that the City Council met in Closed Session regarding Koerner v. City of Hermosa Beach, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP00891. The Council voted 4-1 to direct the City Attorney not to file an appeal.

9. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS
Mayor Detoy announced the following upcoming events: the Community-Wide Garage Sale on May 16th from 7:00 AM to noon; Fiesta Hermosa returning Memorial Day weekend, May 23–25, 2026, marking its 50th year as Southern California's largest beachside arts and crafts festival; and Little League playoffs at Clarkfield. The Mayor invited residents to register for the no-fee garage sale permit on the City website and directed the public to fiestahermosa.net for Fiesta information.

10. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.

Moved by: Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by: Councilmember Francois
Motion by Councilember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to approve the order of the agenda.

Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
Motion Carried

11. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

11.a RECOGNIZING MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH
Mayor Detoy on behalf of the City Council presented a proclamation declaring May as Mental Health Awareness Month to Beach Cities Health District (BCHD), Volunteer Engagement Coordinator, Alejandra Sierra.

Volunteer Engagement Coordinator Sierra spoke on Mental Health Awareness.

BCHD Alcove Beach Cities Representatives Chloe and Trevor announced the grand opening of their permanent facility on May 16, 2026, supporting mental health and wellbeing for community members ages 12-25.

4 11.b CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ST. PATRICK’S DAY PARADE POSTEVENT REVIEW Chamber of Commerce President, Michelle Crispin provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.

City Council thanked President Crispin on the report and the Chamber of Commerce efforts on the St. Patrick's Day Parade.

12. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
• Sarah Harper - Library Programs (In-Person)
• County of Los Angeles Fire Department (LACoFD), Assistant Fire Chief, Brian Kane - Continued Fire Services for the City of Hermosa Beach (InPerson) • Jim Holtz - Short Term Rentals (In-Person)
• Michelle Hampton- Excessive Speeding (In-Person)
• Harris Goodison - Dog Park (In-Person)
• Tony Higgins - Agenda Item No. 15.e (Performance Metrics, Accountability, St. Patrick's Day Parade (Virtual)
• Falk Underwood - Dog Park (Virtual)
• Kristin Moreno - Reduced Speed Limits (Virtual)
• Dave H. - Hermosa Beach Police Department Budget (Virtual) • Jim Stevens Dog Park (In-Person)
• Ana Haynee - Dog Park (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

13. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
No formal comments were made.

14. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
Councilmember Ray Jackson reported on the inaugural meeting of the South Bay Housing Trust, formed through the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (COG), comprising 11 cities, and focused on homeless and low-income housing.

He further reported that the COG has endorsed a program to replace the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. Councilmember Jackson

5 also noted that the Hermosa Valley School girls flag football team, which he cocoaches, concluded its season with a 5–2 record.

Mayor Mike Detoy reported on his attendance at the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly, highlighting presentations on REAP grant-funded infrastructure investment and the election of Mayor Light as the new Regional Chair.

15. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Detoy requested to move Agenda Item No. 15.d - Amendments to the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club and Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club Agreements to be considered after Municipal Matters.

Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to approve the Consent Calendar Agenda Item Nos. 15.a - 15.f, with the exception of Agenda Item No. 15.d, being removed to be considered after Municipal Matters.

Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
Motion Carried

15.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

ON THE AGENDA
Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

Motion Carried

15.b CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
(City Clerk Martha Alvarez)
Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
To approve the minutes from the April 28, 2026, Regular Meeting and the April 28, 2026, Regular Adjourned Meeting.

6 Motion Carried

15.c CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-055
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for April 22, 2026 through April 29, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.

Motion Carried

15.e REQUEST TO APPROVE JOB SPECIFICATION REVISIONS, JOB

SPECIFICATION ADDITIONS, BARGAINING GROUPS AND SALARY
RANGES - 26-AS-052
(Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman)
Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
Staff recommends City Council:

1. Approve the revisions for the following job specifications: Senior Account Clerk (Attachment 1), Human Resources Manager
(Attachment 2), Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 3), Community Resources Director (Attachment 4), Senior Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 5), and Recreation Specialist
(Attachment 6);

2. Approve the establishment of the following new job specifications:

Account Specialist (Attachment 7), Lead Account Specialist (Attachment 8), Senior Accountant (Attachment 9), Revenue Services Manager (Attachment 10), Human Resources Technician (Attachment 11), Senior Human Resources Analyst (Attachment 12), Recreation Supervisor (Attachment 13), Parks and Recreation Manager (Attachment 14), and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst (Attachment 15);

3. Approve the establishment of the five-step salary ranges (Attachment 16) for Account Specialist, Lead Account Specialist, Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Human Resources Technician, Senior Human Resources Analyst, Recreation
Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst;

7 4. Approve the establishment of Account Specialist and Lead Account Specialist in the General and Supervisory Employees’ Bargaining Unit Teamsters Local 986;

5. Approve the establishment of Senior Accountant, Revenue Services Manager, Recreation Supervisor, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Senior Crime and Intelligence Analyst in the Professional and Administrative Employees’ Group; and

6. Approve the establishment of Human Resources Technician and Senior Human Resources Analyst in the Unrepresented Employee Group.

Motion Carried

15.f RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW CATEGORY AND FEE FOR
COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-027
(Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss)
Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
Motion to adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7547 establishing a new category and fee for certain commercial encroachment areas in commercial zones; and amend the Master Fee schedule to reflect the new fee.

Motion Carried

16. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M

16.a RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26- AS-053
(Continued from the April 28, 2026, City Council Meeting) (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.

City Manager Steve Napolitano, Administrative Services Director Walker, and Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore responded to City Council questions.

Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
• Tony Higgins (Virtual)
• Kent Allen (Virtual

8 • Kathy Knoll (In-Person)
• Michelle Crispin (In-Person)
• Laura Pena (In-Person)
• Eric Horne (In-Person)
• Jon David (In-Person)
• John Burry (Virtual)
• Kristin Moreno (Virtual)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

Administrative Services Director Walker responded to City Council questions.

A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, to only defer the list of 19 items previously agreed upon at the last meeting, considering the deferred items in a comprehensive study session where all relevant parties could discuss them in detail. The motion failed for lack of a second.

A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to add Item S-004 (PDP for Commercial) to the deferred list as the only modification to the original 19 items pulled for further review and postpone the discussion until June 5, 2026.

A substitute motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Mayor Detoy, to intended to defer the item S-004 was proposed.

Moved by: Mayor Detoy
Seconded by: Councilmember Jackson
A substitute motion was made by Mayor Detoy, seconded by Councilmember Jackson, to continue the public hearing to June 9, 2026, to apply to the original 19 previously pulled fees plus the addition of fee S004.

Ayes (4): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann
Noes (1): Councilmember Francois
Motion Carried

17. MUNICIPAL MATTERS

17.b DOG PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY - 26-PR-018
(Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa)

9 This item was considered out of order.

Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols provided a brief introduction to the item.

Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa provided the PowerPoint presentation.

Senior Recreation Supervisor Sousa, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, City Manager Steve Napolitano, and City Clerk Martha Alvarez responded to City Council questions.

Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments and clarified that due to high volume of public comments, each speaker would have two minutes for public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
• Jack Levy (In-Person)
• Carla Buck (In-Person)
• Kimm Dunne (In-Person)
• Wendy Finster (In-Person)
• Jim Stevens (Provided a speaker card but did not speak) • Gina Rossi (In-Person)
• Mark Hofstadter (In-Person)
• Jeff Miller (In-Person)
• William Grow (In-Person)
• Roi Robinson (In-Person)
• Irina Gaal (In-Person)
• Shawn Moonan (In-Person)
• Eric Horne (In-Person)
• Jim Stevens (Was called again, provided a speaker card but did not speak)
• Tony Higgins (Virtual)
• Kristin Moreno (Virtual)
• Tom Coyle (Virtual)
• Laura Pena (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

10 City Manager Napolitano and Senior Recreation Supervisor Sousa responded to City Council questions.

A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Mayor Deoty, to direct staff to proceed with a comprehensive feasibility analysis of the South Park location.

Moved by: Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by: Councilmember Francois
A substitute motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to direct staff to proceed with a comprehensive feasibility analysis of Valley Park East as the primary location and the Greenbelt as a secondary location, and to return with information on a potential ballot measure regarding the Greenbelt location.

Ayes (3): Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
Noes (2): Mayor Detoy, and Councilmember Jackson
Motion Carried

17.c CONSIDERATION OF INCREASE TO PICKLEBALL MEMBERSHIP AND RESERVATION FEES - 26-PR-025
(Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)
Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols provided the PowerPoint presentation.

Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
• Geraldine Poon (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

City Manager Steve Napolitano, Parks and Recreation Director Nichols, and Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa responded to City Council questions.

Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by
Councilmember Saemann, to approve Option 2, setting the annual membership rate at $25 and the resident hourly reservation rate at $12 per hour.

11 Ayes (3): Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
Noes (2): Mayor Detoy, and Councilmember Jackson
Motion Carried

17.a DEPARTMENT FY 2026-2027 BUDGET PRESENTATIONS - 26-AS-054 (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
At 9:32 p.m., the City Council recessed and reconvened at 9:42 p.m. with all City Councilmembers present.

City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call.

Present: Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
City Manager Steve Napolitano provided a brief overview regarding the budget process.

Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.

Police Chief Landon Phillips provided the Police Department PowerPoint presentation.

City Manager Napolitano and Police Chief Phillips responded to City Council questions.

Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente provided the Public Works Department PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.

Parks and Recreations Director Lisa Nichols provided the Parks and Recreation Department PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.

Community Development Director Alison Becker provided the Community Development Department PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.

Senior Management Analyst Sara Russon and Senior Management Analyst Kenneth Bales provided the City Manager's PowerPoint presentation.

City Clerk Martha Alvarez provided the City Clerk's Office PowerPoint presentation.

Administrative Services Director Walker and City Manager Napolitano concluded the PowerPoint presentation.

12 Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.

Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Deoty closed the floor to public comments.

Moved by: Mayor Detoy
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion was made by Mayor Detoy, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to receive and file the FY 2026–2027 Department Budget Presentations.

Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
Motion Carried

17.d CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL

PARK SERVICE LOS ANGELES COASTAL AREA SPECIAL
RESOURCE STUDY - 26-CMO-029
(City Manager Steve Napolitano)
City Manager Steve Napolitano provided a brief overview and provided clarification.

Management Analyst Leo Zalyan provided the PowerPoint presentation.

Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.

Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, to examine the potential benefits and concerns associated with joining the NPS Special Resource Study before making any decision. The motion failed for lack of second.

Management Analyst Zalyan responded to City Council questions.

Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Mayor Detoy
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Mayor Deoty, to direct staff to participate in the National Park Service Los Angeles Coastal Area Special Resource Study and to return draft comments for City Council review prior to submission.

Ayes (3): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois
Noes (2): Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann

13 Motion Carried

17.e INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO DISCUSS IDENTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR ALCOHOL-SERVING ESTABLISHMENTS - 26-
PD-008
Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Police Chief Landon Phillips)
Police Chief Landon Phillips provided the PowerPoint presentation.

Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.

Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

Police Chief Phillips responded to City Council questions.

Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by
Councilmember Saemann, to receive and file the informational report.

Motion Carried

17.f INFORMATIONAL ITEM REGARDING LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 1942: ELECTRIC BICYCLES: REGISTRATION AND SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES - 26-CMO-024
Information items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A City Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting. (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo)
Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo provided the PowerPoint presentation
Senior Management Analyst Russo and City Manager Steve Napolitano responded to City Council questions.

Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.

Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

Moved by: Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to direct staff to return with a letter of support for AB

14 1942 (Assembly Bill 1942) as currently written as an action item on a future Consent Calendar.

Ayes (4): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann
Noes (1): Councilmember Francois
Motion Carried

15. CONSENT CALENDAR

15.d AMENDMENTS TO THE HERMOSA BEACH ROTARY CLUB AND
HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB AGREEMENTS - 26-PR-024
(Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)
This item was removed from the Consent Calendar to be considered after Municipal Matters.

Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols provided the staff presentation.

Councimember Saemann reported his role as part of the Kiwanis Club and noted no personal financial gain was involved.

Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.

Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.

Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Parks and Recreation Director Nichols, and City Manager Steve Napolitano responded to City Council questions.

Moved by: Mayor Detoy
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion made by Mayor Detoy, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to approve the seventh amendment to the agreement with the Hermosa Beach Rotary Club, approve the first amendment to the agreement with the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club, and authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest both amendments subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Ayes (5): Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
Motion Carried

18. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

15 Councilmember Jackson requested that a comprehensive review of city speed limits be agendized as an informational item, focusing on major thoroughfares including Hermosa Avenue, 27th Street, Valley Drive, Ardmore Avenue, and Prospect Avenue. City Manager Napolitano indicated staff would evaluate available options under current state authority and report back to Council, noting that Public Works capacity constraints would be a factor. The request received support from Mayor Detoy.

18.a TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-030
Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.

This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.

19. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Steve Napolitano reminded the community that City Hall and the Community Center will be closed on Monday, May 25, 2026, in observance of Memorial Day. Street sweeping and parking enforcement along PCH (Pacific Coast Highway), as well as all construction work, will be suspended that day; all other local parking regulations remain in effect, and trash collection will be delayed by one day.

20. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

20.a PARKING CITATIONS AND METERED REVENUE REPORT - APRIL 2026
(Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales)
This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.

21. ADJOURNMENT
At 12:11 a.m., Mayor Detoy adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, May 26, 2026, a 5:00 p.m.

City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: May 26, 2026
Staff Report No. 26-AS-058
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council

CHECK REGISTERS
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for May 7, 2026, through May 13, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.

Attachments:

1. Check Register 5-7-2026

2. Check Register 5-13-2026
Respectfully Submitted by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager
Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
111988 5/7/2026 11437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO OP 260304 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM/MAR26 145-3404-4201 1,296.50
145-3853 -48.00
11437 Total : 1,248.50
111989 5/7/2026 23279 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC 647819 REPAIR SIKLU RADIO ISSUE AT LOT C 122-8699-4201 1,500.00
23279 Total : 1,500.00
111990 5/7/2026 09366 AQUA FLO SI2731750 MR#989989 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 001-6101-4309 206.41
SI2736995 MR#989991 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001-6101-4309 950.69
SI2740482 MR#989992 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001-6101-4309 307.86
09366 Total : 1,464.96
111991 5/7/2026 16660 ATHENS SERVICES 20899127 CITYWIDE SWEEPING&PORTER SVS/DEC25 001-3301-4201 12,634.33
001-3104-4201 18,958.70
001-6101-4201 1,856.26
20899127A STEAM CLEANING SVS/DEC25
001-3301-4201 7,475.02
001-3104-4201 702.22
20899127B SCRUBBER SERVICES/DEC25
001-3301-4201 7,280.99
16660 Total : 48,907.52
111992 5/7/2026 16660 ATHENS SERVICES 21501958 PD SHREDDING SERVICE/APR26 001-2101-4309 86.67
21699098 PD SHREDDING SERVICE/MAY26
001-2101-4309 86.67
16660 Total : 173.34
111993 5/7/2026 20705 BEECASSO LIVE BEE REMOVAL INC 5640 BEE REMOVAL ON GREENBELT @8TH ST 001-6101-4201 225.00
20705 Total : 225.00

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
111994 5/7/2026 06409 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 4509938 MAT REQ 452208 ASPHALT 001-3104-4309 333.17
06409 Total : 333.17
111995 5/7/2026 00016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE Acct 4286211111 WATER USAGE - MAR26 105-2601-4303 5,121.87
001-6101-4303 26,858.22
001-4204-4303 2,242.87
001-3304-4303 447.74
00016 Total : 34,670.70
111996 5/7/2026 10838 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC 6015694569 COPIER MAINT/BASE 3/JAN-APR26 001-3302-4305 18.54
6015694570 COPIER MAINT/PW ADMIN/JAN-APR26
001-1208-4305 217.74
6015694571 COPIER MAINT/PARKS&REC/JAN-APR26
001-4601-4305 259.67
6015694572 COPIER MAINT/POLICE DEPT/JAN-APR26
001-2101-4305 280.05
6015694573 COPIER MAINT/PD RECORDS/JAN-APR26
001-2101-4305 132.52
6015694575 COPIER MAINT/2ND FL ADMIN/JAN-APR26
001-1208-4305 225.50
6015694576 COPIER MAINT/COMM DEV/JAN-APR26
001-1208-4305 37.42
10838 Total : 1,171.44
111997 5/7/2026 21720 CAPITAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC 504726 MR#512095 ELECTRICAL MAINT SUPPLIES 105-2601-4309 793.38
21720 Total : 793.38
111998 5/7/2026 09632 CDWG AJ11C2H MR#782617 PRINTER TONER/INK 001-2101-4305 767.50
09632 Total : 767.50
111999 5/7/2026 23873 CEM CONSTRUCTION CORP 26-011 GREENWICH UUAD CONST SVS/MAR26 313-8114-4201 217,583.34
23873 Total : 217,583.34
112000 5/7/2026 23578 CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 90793740 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 4.23.26

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112000 5/7/2026 23578 CENTERS OF CA, A MEDICAL CORP, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (Continued) 001-1203-4320 218.00
23578 Total : 218.00
112001 5/7/2026 20236 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398601042126 1301 HERMOSA/540 PIER CONNECTION/MAY26 001-2101-4304 298.62
20236 Total : 298.62
112002 5/7/2026 20236 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398201042126 1301 HERMOSA/RRC CONNECTION/MAY26 001-2101-4304 150.00
20236 Total : 150.00
112003 5/7/2026 20236 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 188398801042126 CITY HALL CABLE/APR26 715-4204-4201 135.63
20236 Total : 135.63
112004 5/7/2026 24115 CHILDS, NICOLE PO45600 MULTIPLE CITATION REFUNDS - OVERPAID 001-3302 214.00
24115 Total : 214.00
112005 5/7/2026 23507 CJ CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 7146-RET PROJECT RETENTION PYMT 115-3104-4201 2,794.75
23507 Total : 2,794.75
112006 5/7/2026 09694 CLEAN ENERGY CE12840392 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS/APR26 715-4601-4310 48.00
09694 Total : 48.00
112007 5/7/2026 20781 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES C0014193 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES/JUN26 001-2202-4251 -348,930.00
001-2202-4251 574,215.00
20781 Total : 225,285.00
112008 5/7/2026 00364 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 035192 MAT REQ 805335/FINGERPRINTING/MAR26 001-1203-4251 256.00
00364 Total : 256.00
112009 5/7/2026 00267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SL260714 SIGNAL&LIGHTING MAINT/JAN-MAR26 105-2601-4251 6,142.03

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112009 5/7/2026 00267 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Continued) Total : 6,142.03 112010 5/7/2026 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 759408 CITYWIDE PEST CONTROL/APR26 001-4204-4201 1,060.00
11449 Total : 1,060.00
112011 5/7/2026 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 1233239 SEWER RAT ABATEMENT/APR26 160-3102-4201 278.00
11449 Total : 278.00
112012 5/7/2026 22360 EL TARASCO PO45589 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT LUNCHEON 5.7.26 001-1203-4201 1,725.00
22360 Total : 1,725.00
112013 5/7/2026 22926 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 109-1125397 MR#472058 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PARTS 715-3302-4311 147.24
22926 Total : 147.24
112014 5/7/2026 21402 FLYING LION, INC. 3032 DRONE LEASE & FAA REPORTING/MAY26 153-2106-4201 1,775.00
21402 Total : 1,775.00
112015 5/7/2026 22778 FRANCOIS, DEAN PO45590 REIMB-CAL CITIES POLICY COMMITTEE MEETIN 001-1101-4317 69.91
22778 Total : 69.91
112016 5/7/2026 19884 FRONTIER 310-318-8751-0128095 CASHIER TAP LINE/MAY26 001-1204-4304 102.36
19884 Total : 102.36
112017 5/7/2026 22871 GALL, TINA KATCHEN 025-042026 CDBG ADMIN & LABOR COMPLIANCE/APR26 001-4202-4201 1,300.00
22871 Total : 1,300.00
112018 5/7/2026 10836 GRAINGER 9893360710 DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR COMM CENTER 715-4204-4201 2,084.38
715-4204-4201 200.30
10836 Total : 2,284.68
112019 5/7/2026 13932 HB CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PO45602 2026 ST. PATRICK'S DAY PARADE REIMB

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112019 5/7/2026 13932 HB CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (Continued) 001-3418 26,669.16
13932 Total : 26,669.16
112020 5/7/2026 22725 HERC RENTALS 36401654-03 LIFT RENTAL FOR LOT C 105-2601-4201 1,625.44
22725 Total : 1,625.44
112021 5/7/2026 19314 IPS GROUP INC INV124575 PARKING METER CC FEES/APR26 001-3302-4201 19,298.25
001-3304-4201 451.57
001-3305-4201 1,011.56
19314 Total : 20,761.38
112022 5/7/2026 00151 LA CO SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 262532BL MAT REQ 472452 INMATE MEALS/MAR26 001-2101-4306 120.31
00151 Total : 120.31
112023 5/7/2026 20771 LA UNIFORMS & TAILORING INC 32578 MR#782603 PD UNIFORMS/CERVANTES 001-3302-4314 330.17
32651 MR#854366 PD UNIFORMS-NAMEPLATES
001-3302-4314 291.72
20771 Total : 621.89
112024 5/7/2026 22038 MARQUEZ-VIRAMONTES, MARIA TR1297 PER DIEM - CAPE CONF 5/18-5/22/26 001-2101-4317 145.00
22038 Total : 145.00
112025 5/7/2026 18996 NUVIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 28691 PICKLEBALL COURT IMPROVEMENTS/NOV25-APR2 301-8619-4201 4,500.00
18996 Total : 4,500.00
112026 5/7/2026 22673 O'BRIEN BENDER, JEANNE 42026 CITY RECORDS ORGANIZATION/APR26 001-1121-4201 2,375.00
22673 Total : 2,375.00
112027 5/7/2026 13114 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 467709281001 MAT REQ 435428/OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1202-4305 86.35
13114 Total : 86.35

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112028 5/7/2026 23018 PARKMOBILE, LLC US032-2026-001223 PAY-BY-APP PARKING FEES/APR26 001-3304-4201 1,260.02
001-3305-4201 1,774.82
001-3302-4201 3,755.91
23018 Total : 6,790.75
112029 5/7/2026 23226 PEGASUS STUDIOS 1161 VIDEO BROADCASTING SERVICES/APR26 001-1121-4201 5,741.57
23226 Total : 5,741.57
112030 5/7/2026 13608 PSOMAS 234183 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SVS FOR CIP106 301-8106-4201 15,950.00
13608 Total : 15,950.00
112031 5/7/2026 22179 RACE COMMUNICATIONS RC2162180 CITY HALL & YARD FIBER INTERNET/MAY26 715-1206-4201 2,040.00
22179 Total : 2,040.00
112032 5/7/2026 20603 RECWEST OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC. 20996 MEMORIAL BENCH FOR SANDYA MAGGE 001-6101-5402 2,419.00
001-6101-5402 200.36
21000 MEMORIAL BENCH - JIM&JANE GIERLICH
001-6101-5402 2,419.00
001-6101-5402 200.36
20603 Total : 5,238.72
112033 5/7/2026 13255 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 109187 MR#471961 KNOX BOX, KEYS & LOCK 715-4204-4201 998.58
109210 MR#512100 LOCKSMITH SERVICES
001-4204-4309 150.00
13255 Total : 1,148.58
112034 5/7/2026 15582 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 22683 MR#472010 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPPLIES 001-3104-4201 1,626.01
22684 MR#472008 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPPLIES
001-3104-4201 4,984.12
227422 MR#472009 STREET SIGN MAINT SUPPLIES
001-3104-4201 594.36
15582 Total : 7,204.49

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112035 5/7/2026 22419 ROBERT HALF 66177819 TEMP STAFFING - CCO - ENDING 5.1.26 001-1121-4201 3,040.05
66187007 TEMP STAFFING - HR - ENDING 5.1.26
001-1203-4201 3,500.00
22419 Total : 6,540.05
112036 5/7/2026 17830 SIERRA ENGINEERING SERVICES HMB1012 ANNUAL AQMD REPORT 001-4202-4201 700.00
17830 Total : 700.00
112037 5/7/2026 00170 SOCAL GAS 097 904 5900 3 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR26 001-4204-4303 151.87
00170 Total : 151.87
112038 5/7/2026 00170 SOCAL GAS 102 104 5900 3 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR26 001-4204-4303 88.38
00170 Total : 88.38
112039 5/7/2026 00170 SOCAL GAS 011 004 5767 8 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR26 001-4204-4303 28.62
00170 Total : 28.62
112040 5/7/2026 00170 SOCAL GAS 141 204 4600 1 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS/MAR26 001-4204-4303 22.77
00170 Total : 22.77
112041 5/7/2026 13761 SOURCE GRAPHICS INC SG255686 INK CARTRIDGE 001-4202-4305 400.00
001-4202-4305 39.00
13761 Total : 439.00
112042 5/7/2026 00113 SOUTH BAY FIRE, INC. 197638 MR#473102 FIRE EXTINGUISHER ACCESSORIES 001-4204-4201 625.58
197643 MR#473101 FIRE EXTINGUISHER REFILLS
001-4204-4201 375.97
00113 Total : 1,001.55
112043 5/7/2026 16339 SOUTHLAND FIRE ALARM GROUP INC 3155367 REPAIR - FIRE WIRE&PULL BOX @COMM CTR 715-4204-4201 1,640.00

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112043 5/7/2026 16339 SOUTHLAND FIRE ALARM GROUP INC (Continued) Total : 1,640.00 112044 5/7/2026 21538 SPECIALIZED ELEVATOR SERVICES 96936 PARKING STRUCTURE ELEVATOR MAINT/MAY26 001-3304-4201 230.84
96937 CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINT/MAY26
001-4204-4201 222.62
21538 Total : 453.46
112045 5/7/2026 21146 TIREHUB LLC 58339301 MR#472059 VEHICLE TIRES 715-2101-4311 576.56
21146 Total : 576.56
112046 5/7/2026 19082 T-MOBILE Acct 954297746 PW/CDD/CMO CELL PHONES/TABLETS/APR26 001-1201-4304 51.54
001-4201-4304 213.84
001-4202-4304 833.10
19082 Total : 1,098.48
112047 5/7/2026 19082 T-MOBILE Acct 217007781 PW&CDD TABLETS/APR26 001-4202-4304 131.04
001-4201-4304 43.68
19082 Total : 174.72
112048 5/7/2026 19082 T-MOBILE Acct 267037374 PARKS&REC CELL PHONES/APR26 001-4601-4304 139.75
19082 Total : 139.75
112049 5/7/2026 19082 T-MOBILE Acct 946625962 PD RECORDS/WATCH COMMAND/CELLS/APR26 001-2101-4304 81.40
19082 Total : 81.40
112050 5/7/2026 16735 TORRANCE AUTO PARTS ACCT 2250 AUTO REPAIR/MAINTENANCE PARTS/APR26 715-2101-4311 1,017.70
715-3302-4311 341.04
715-4202-4311 57.72
001-2021 22.92
001-2022 -22.92
16735 Total : 1,416.46
112051 5/7/2026 15901 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC 20263018-3026 ENGINEERING SUPPORT SVS/MAR26

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112051 5/7/2026 15901 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC (Continued) 001-4202-4201 16,043.80
15901 Total : 16,043.80
112052 5/7/2026 05626 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-560243 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 4.6&4.9.26 715-1206-4201 2,608.00
045-560745 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 4.12-4.15.26
715-1206-4201 5,216.00
05626 Total : 7,824.00
112053 5/7/2026 08207 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 420260349 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTS/APR26 160-3102-4201 96.00
08207 Total : 96.00
112054 5/7/2026 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667301 VOIP PHONES/CITY HALL&PD/MAR26 001-1101-4304 12.91
001-1121-4304 45.18
001-1132-4304 12.91
001-1141-4304 25.82
001-1201-4304 122.62
001-1202-4304 77.45
001-1203-4304 70.99
001-1204-4304 83.90
001-1208-4304 6.45
001-2101-4304 425.95
001-4101-4304 83.90
001-4201-4304 109.71
001-4202-4304 180.71
160-3102-4201 12.91
715-1206-4304 19.35
18666 Total : 1,290.76
112055 5/7/2026 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667966 VOIP PHONES/PW YARD/MAR26 001-4202-4304 119.52
18666 Total : 119.52
112056 5/7/2026 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667304 VOIP PHONES/PARKS&REC/MAR26 001-4601-4304 117.02
18666 Total : 117.02

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112057 5/7/2026 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667960 VOIP PHONES/BASE 3/MAR26 001-3302-4304 66.80
18666 Total : 66.80
112058 5/7/2026 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667954 VOIP PHONES/BARD/MAR26 001-3302-4304 51.12
18666 Total : 51.12
112059 5/7/2026 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73667306 VOIP PHONES/EOC/MAR26 001-1201-4304 40.44
18666 Total : 40.44
112060 5/7/2026 18666 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 73668166 VOIP PHONES/CHA/MAR26 001-1201-4304 11.58
18666 Total : 11.58
112061 5/7/2026 03209 VERIZON WIRELESS 6141217290 PD TRUNK MODEMS/APR26 153-2106-4201 1,040.30
03209 Total : 1,040.30
112062 5/7/2026 22726 WEATHERPROOFING TECHNOLOGIES 98471896 14TH ST RESTROOM ROOF RENOVATION 001-4204-4201 13,890.00
22726 Total : 13,890.00
3511863 4/22/2026 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 111866376 VEHICLE FUEL 3/10/26-4/9/26 715-2101-4310 4,236.13
715-4204-4310 490.84
715-4206-4310 250.88
715-6101-4310 607.31
715-3104-4310 441.91
715-4202-4310 284.01
001-1250 106.92
715-3302-4310 1,882.60
10668 Total : 8,300.60
22960327 4/23/2026 15230 CALPERS FISCAL SERVICES DIV 100000018273802 REPLACEMENT BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION - 2026 001-2101-4184 1,118.16
15230 Total : 1,118.16
26373813 4/30/2026 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES ACCT ENDING 5596 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/APR26

05/07/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11 8:26:10AM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
26373813 4/30/2026 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 001-4204-4309 1,242.81
001-3304-4309 26.74
001-3104-4201 1,135.07
001-3104-4309 2,043.11
001-6101-4309 374.97
001-4204-4309 364.39
001-6101-4201 143.77
715-4204-4201 843.42
715-4206-4309 475.23
001-2021 123.74
001-2022 -123.74
03432 Total : 6,649.51
78 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 725,354.39 78 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 725,354.39

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112063 5/13/2026 23943 ABRIGO, MEGAN PO44821 CITATION (31040283) REFUND - OVERPAID 001-3302 68.00
23943 Total : 68.00
112064 5/13/2026 23796 AED BRANDS LLC 197072 AEDS FOR PD & COMM SVS 715-2101-4201 17,000.00
715-3302-4201 17,000.00
715-2101-4201 1,657.50
715-3302-4201 1,657.50
23796 Total : 37,315.00
112065 5/13/2026 23965 ALL AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION 25-33.06 KELLY COURT IMPROVEMENTS/APR26 301-8619-4201 18,808.60
23965 Total : 18,808.60
112066 5/13/2026 06827 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT PS-INV105702 CROSSING GUARD SERVICE/4.12-4.25.26 146-2102-4201 18,700.47
06827 Total : 18,700.47
112067 5/13/2026 00321 AT&T 960 461-1985 555 7 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/MAY26 001-2101-4304 250.70
00321 Total : 250.70
112068 5/13/2026 23101 ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS Req 46 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS/APR26A 705-1217-4324 13,135.38
Req 47 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS/APR26B
705-1217-4324 18,848.74
23101 Total : 31,984.12
112069 5/13/2026 23877 AVILA, PAUL PO45627 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT/SPRING26 001-1204-4317 2,520.00
23877 Total : 2,520.00
112070 5/13/2026 17428 BADGE BEHAVIOR Y327060 TUITION-IMPLICIT BIAS COURSE 001-2101-4313 150.00
17428 Total : 150.00
112071 5/13/2026 23474 BEVINS, RIAN PO42435 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT REFUND 001-3843 175.00

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112071 5/13/2026 23474 BEVINS, RIAN (Continued) Total : 175.00 112072 5/13/2026 08763 BOB BARKER COMPANY, INC. INV2233083 JAIL MATERIALS 001-2101-4306 215.20
001-2101-4306 19.22
08763 Total : 234.42
112073 5/13/2026 14465 CALEA INV46470 ON-SITE FEE ASSESSMENT 001-2101-4201 364.25
14465 Total : 364.25
112074 5/13/2026 00262 CALIFORNIA MARKING DEVICE 7641 MR#973917 NAMESTAMP/ALVAREZ 001-1101-4305 38.41
00262 Total : 38.41
112075 5/13/2026 21720 CAPITAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC 505178 MR#512096 ELECTRICAL MAINT SUPPLIES 715-4204-4201 953.78
505306 MR#512098 ELECTRICAL MAINT SUPPLIES
715-4204-4201 963.12
21720 Total : 1,916.90
112076 5/13/2026 20236 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 241350501050126 HD PEG CHANNEL/MAY26 715-1206-4201 636.00
20236 Total : 636.00
112077 5/13/2026 24113 CLUB RHYTHMIC LLC PO45637 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.6.26 001-4601-4221 890.91
24113 Total : 890.91
112078 5/13/2026 05970 COLLINS, DENNIS L. PO45638 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.3.26 001-4601-4221 5,168.54
05970 Total : 5,168.54
112079 5/13/2026 23991 COUNTRY HILLS ANIMAL CLINIC 2469 K9 ARCO MED SVS - INJURY 5.5.26 170-2105-4201 1,215.75
23991 Total : 1,215.75
112080 5/13/2026 10702 DANIEL, JOEL Parcel 4169 037 025 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE/2025 001-6871 147.35
105-3105 24.61

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112080 5/13/2026 10702 DANIEL, JOEL (Continued) Total : 171.96 112081 5/13/2026 00049 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION PO45606 STRONG MOTION MAP FEES OCT23-JUN25 001-3204 10,190.54
00049 Total : 10,190.54
112082 5/13/2026 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL ACCT 1553576 TERMITE CONTROL-PD RANGE&OFFICE 001-4204-4201 4,950.00
ACCT 1553586 TERMITE CONTROL-PD STORAGE RM
001-4204-4201 3,200.00
11449 Total : 8,150.00
112083 5/13/2026 23629 DTA PUBLIC FINANCE, INC. 2603263 ENG REP-FY27 SEWER LEVY/MAR26 160-3102-4201 1,048.03
23629 Total : 1,048.03
112084 5/13/2026 00181 EASY READER STMT 5833 MAT REQ 472853 LEGAL ADS/APR26 001-1121-4323 1,430.64
00181 Total : 1,430.64
112085 5/13/2026 16922 EMERGENCY RESPONSE CRIME SCENE T2026-285 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.10.26 001-2101-4201 850.00
T2026-287 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.11.26
001-2101-4201 2,550.00
T2026-288 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.12.26
001-2101-4201 850.00
T2026-289 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.13.26
001-2101-4201 2,550.00
T2026-294 CLEAN & SANITIZE JAIL 4.15.26
001-2101-4201 1,300.00
T2026-295 CLEAN & SANITIZE PD VEHICLE 4.15.26
001-2101-4201 650.00
T2026-324 CLEANING SERVICE 4.30.26
001-2101-4201 2,550.00
16922 Total : 11,300.00
112086 5/13/2026 15059 EVANS, MARLIN K. PO45640 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASS 12320 001-4601-4221 103.73
15059 Total : 103.73

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112087 5/13/2026 08625 EXPRESS ENVIRONMENTAL CORP 2605007 HAZARDOUS WASTE PAINT REMOVAL 001-3104-4201 695.00
08625 Total : 695.00
112088 5/13/2026 06293 FEDEX OFFICE 101600021985 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS 001-1101-4305 7.86
101600030396 MR#435427 BUS CARDS-CASHMAN
001-1203-4305 31.01
101600080380 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS
001-1101-4305 1.59
101600090767 MR#806549 PRINTING SERVICES/BANNERS
001-4601-4302 218.27
101600123690 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS
001-1101-4305 1.59
101600142519 MR#973919 CERTIFICATE PRINTING SVS
001-1101-4305 3.18
06293 Total : 263.50
112089 5/13/2026 24085 FIJALKA ENGINEERING, PC 109 CIP114 ENGINEERING SERVICES/APR26 313-8114-4201 712.50
24085 Total : 712.50
112090 5/13/2026 22778 FRANCOIS, DEAN PO45620 MILEAGE REIMB FOR CERRITOS EVENT 001-1101-4305 29.87
22778 Total : 29.87
112091 5/13/2026 19884 FRONTIER 310-318-0113-1203155 EOC ANALOG LINES/MAY26 715-1206-4304 1,570.27
19884 Total : 1,570.27
112092 5/13/2026 22449 GILBERT, LYNNE ROSENBERG PO44831 CITATION (30022377-78) REFUND - OVERPAID 001-3302 151.00
22449 Total : 151.00
112093 5/13/2026 21478 GRUBER AND LOPEZ, INC. 4962 AUDIT SERVICES FOR FY24/25 001-1202-4201 32,602.55
001-1202-4201 2,550.00
21478 Total : 35,152.55
112094 5/13/2026 22893 GUILLEN, JESSICA PO43567 PER DIEM - PEER SUPPORT TRAINING

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112094 5/13/2026 22893 GUILLEN, JESSICA (Continued)
001-2101-4313 75.00
22893 Total : 75.00
112095 5/13/2026 23945 HINES, PAIGE PO44832 CITATION (33024561) REFUND - OVERPAID 001-3302 83.00
23945 Total : 83.00
112096 5/13/2026 23148 HKA ELEVATOR CONSULTING, INC. 00353543 LOT C ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION SVS 301-8699-4201 1,075.00
23148 Total : 1,075.00
112097 5/13/2026 23371 HOBELMAN, GUILLERMO PO45622 TR1290 CLOSEOUT-ICC LEADERSHIP WEEK 001-4201-4317 3,635.56
23371 Total : 3,635.56
112098 5/13/2026 23936 HOGAN, ARACELI PO44803 CIT#43029970 REFUND - CERT OF CORRECTION 001-3302 28.00
23936 Total : 28.00
112099 5/13/2026 19314 IPS GROUP INC INV125273 PARKING METER REPLACEMENT PARTS 001-3302-4201 2,743.75
19314 Total : 2,743.75
112100 5/13/2026 24119 JOE SILVA PHOTOGRAPHY PO45611 ADMIN CITE 7851 DISMISSED 001-3305 1,000.00
24119 Total : 1,000.00
112101 5/13/2026 12162 JOL DESIGN 5.12.26 MR#939333 P.A.R.K. STAFF JACKETS 001-4601-4201 900.50

5.12.26 MR#939332 DAY CAMP T-SHIRTS
001-4601-4201 2,265.68
12162 Total : 3,166.18
112102 5/13/2026 14519 KLOSTERMAN, KENNETH Parcel 4188 020 022 STREET LIGHT & SEWER TAX REBATE/2025 001-6871 147.35
105-3105 24.61
14519 Total : 171.96
112103 5/13/2026 22615 LA COUNTY REGISTRAR RECORDER PO45629 CIP 107 CEQA NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112103 5/13/2026 22615 LA COUNTY REGISTRAR RECORDER (Continued) 001-4202-4305 25.00
22615 Total : 25.00
112104 5/13/2026 20347 LAURA MECOY COMMUNICATIONS LLC 2506 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER SVS/APR26 001-1201-4201 7,200.00
20347 Total : 7,200.00
112105 5/13/2026 00167 LEARNED LUMBER ACCT 1126 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/APR26 001-6101-4309 734.82
00167 Total : 734.82
112106 5/13/2026 18274 MAGNUM VENTURE PARTNERS PO45648 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.9.26 001-4601-4221 7,649.09
18274 Total : 7,649.09
112107 5/13/2026 16613 MCDERMOTT, GARRETT PO45613 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 001-2101-4317 428.48
16613 Total : 428.48
112108 5/13/2026 21033 NV5, INC 512497 CONST MGMT&INSPECTION SVS/MAR26 313-8114-4201 30,523.00
21033 Total : 30,523.00
112109 5/13/2026 13114 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC 464548139001 MAT REQ 939329/OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-4601-4328 65.83
467290523001 MAT REQ 473292/OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-4202-4305 85.74
13114 Total : 151.57
112110 5/13/2026 23195 OLIVERI, CANDISE PO45623 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT-WINTER26 001-1204-4317 138.00
23195 Total : 138.00
112111 5/13/2026 00093 OLYMPIC AUTO CENTER 14737 VEHICLE REPAIR-PW TOYOTA HIGHLANDER 715-4206-4201 3,511.73
14741 MR#472064 AUTO REPAIR HB3
715-2101-4311 635.59
00093 Total : 4,147.32

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112112 5/13/2026 14693 PARS 60335 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/MAR26 001-2101-4185 15.72
001-4201-4185 153.25
001-4202-4185 27.51
14693 Total : 196.48
112113 5/13/2026 23003 PHELPS, JUSTIN TR1305 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/26 001-2101-4317 100.00
23003 Total : 100.00
112114 5/13/2026 11574 PHILLIPS, LANDON TR1299 SUCCESSION PRESENTATION - OHIO PD 5/19-2 001-2101-4317 110.00
11574 Total : 110.00
112115 5/13/2026 20016 PINEDA, LUIS TR1212 PER DIEM - ICI FINANCIAL CRIMES 001-2101-4317 225.00
TR1212 REIMB-HOTEL SECURITY DEPOSIT
001-2101-4317 100.00
20016 Total : 325.00
112116 5/13/2026 13838 PITNEY BOWES INC 3107883991 POSTAGE METER RENTAL/APR-JUN26 715-1208-4201 602.22
13838 Total : 602.22
112117 5/13/2026 24033 PROPERTY HEALTH, INC. 268091 ASBESTOS&PAINT TESTING @LAWN BOWLING BLD 001-4202-4201 1,800.00
24033 Total : 1,800.00
112118 5/13/2026 17676 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY CUST 1275405 YARD UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MATS/APR26 001-2101-4309 77.06
001-3104-4309 86.92
001-3302-4309 69.36
001-4202-4314 404.26
001-4204-4309 156.20
715-4206-4309 54.00
17676 Total : 847.80
112119 5/13/2026 20603 RECWEST OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC. 21023 MEMORIAL BENCH FOR THOMAS MORTIMER 001-6101-5402 2,562.50
001-6101-5402 213.96

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112119 5/13/2026 20603 RECWEST OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC. (Continued) Total : 2,776.46 112120 5/13/2026 13255 RED SECURITY GROUP, LLC 108722 MR#471959 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 001-4204-4309 55.00
109211 MR#512097 ADA PUSH BUTTON
715-4204-4201 206.33
13255 Total : 261.33
112121 5/13/2026 03282 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 584996 CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES/APR26 001-1132-4201 18,444.00
03282 Total : 18,444.00
112122 5/13/2026 21153 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 1354 INSPECTION NOTICE CARDS 001-4201-4305 976.16
21153 Total : 976.16
112123 5/13/2026 22966 ROCHA, KIMBERLY TR1306 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/26 001-2101-4317 100.00
22966 Total : 100.00
112124 5/13/2026 16425 SAFEWAY INC VONS ACCT 150882 P.A.R.K. SUPPLIES/APR26 001-4601-4308 38.39
16425 Total : 38.39
112125 5/13/2026 21406 SAGECREST PLANNING AND ENVIRON 5743 ZONING CODE CONSULTANT SVS/APR26 001-4105-4201 6,045.00
21406 Total : 6,045.00
112126 5/13/2026 03353 SBCU VISA PO456147 A BECKER CC STATEMENT - APR26 001-4201-4315 740.67
001-4101-4305 39.54
001-4101-4317 1,012.27
PO45615 E CAHALAN CC STATEMENT - APR26
001-2101-4201 64.64
001-2101-4306 2,747.66
001-2101-4317 242.17
001-3302-4317 1,406.32
PO45616 J SANCLEMENTE CC STATEMENT - APR26
001-4202-4305 14.33
001-4202-4317 750.00

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112126 5/13/2026 03353 SBCU VISA (Continued)
PO45625 B WALKER CC STATEMENT - APR26
001-1203-4201 15.15
001-1203-4315 390.00
001-1203-4317 1,350.00
PO45635 J CORDOVA CC STATEMENT - APR26
001-3104-4309 91.19
001-3304-4309 48.93
001-3304-4201 245.84
715-3302-4311 119.60
001-6101-4309 679.01
715-2101-4311 62.55
001-4204-4201 508.92
001-3104-4201 150.51
001-4202-4305 112.10
001-6101-4201 1,250.14
PO46524 A YANG CC STATEMENT - APR26
001-1101-4305 527.97
001-1101-4319 19.89
001-1201-4305 660.20
001-1201-4317 125.00
001-1121-4305 65.93
001-1121-4317 1,100.00
001-1121-4201 1,080.00
715-1206-4201 1,045.19
03353 Total : 16,665.72
112127 5/13/2026 23516 SCOTT, CARL PO42597 CITATION (43023669) REFUND - OVERPAID 001-3302 83.00
23516 Total : 83.00
112128 5/13/2026 17903 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CUST 4251-1921-1 PAINTING SUPPLIES/APR26 001-4204-4309 72.50
17903 Total : 72.50
112129 5/13/2026 23382 SLATER WATERPROOFING, INC. 4810 LOT C IMPROVEMENTS/MAR26 122-8699-4201 75,601.00
190-8699-4201 596,682.51

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112129 5/13/2026 23382 SLATER WATERPROOFING, INC. (Continued) Total : 672,283.51 112130 5/13/2026 00114 SMART & FINAL ACCT 322063 REFRESHMENTS&CLEANING SUPPLIES/APR26 001-1101-4305 6.99
001-2101-4306 236.77
00114 Total : 243.76
112131 5/13/2026 00170 SOCAL GAS 170-781-3287 9 YARD CNG STATION/APR26 715-3104-4310 56.28
715-4204-4310 56.28
715-6101-4310 56.28
00170 Total : 168.84
112132 5/13/2026 13761 SOURCE GRAPHICS INC SG1236774 CARTRIDGE&CLEANING KIT FOR PLOTTER 001-4202-4305 418.60
001-4202-4305 38.34
13761 Total : 456.94
112133 5/13/2026 00113 SOUTH BAY FIRE, INC. 197628 MR#925869 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE 001-4204-4201 181.46
00113 Total : 181.46
112134 5/13/2026 15398 SRK PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISING 5403 BACKDROP FOR WTF EVENTS 001-3302-4201 393.80
001-3302-4201 62.41
15398 Total : 456.21
112135 5/13/2026 10493 STANLEY STEEMER OF LA COUNTY 1058378 AIR DUCT CLEANING FOR CITY HALL 715-4204-4201 8,450.00
1058380 AIR DUCT CLEANING FOR POLICE DEPT
715-4204-4201 8,600.00
10493 Total : 17,050.00
112136 5/13/2026 23957 SWISH ACADEMY INC. PO45656 INSTRUCTOR PYMT CLASSES THRU 5.3.26 001-4601-4221 1,622.10
23957 Total : 1,622.10
112137 5/13/2026 19956 TANABE, SEAN TR1295 SUCCESSION PRESENTATION - OHIO PD 5/19-2 001-2101-4317 110.00

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112137 5/13/2026 19956 TANABE, SEAN (Continued) Total : 110.00 112138 5/13/2026 11818 TARANGO, CHERYL Parcel 4184 019 027 SEWER & STREET LIGHT TAX REBATE/2025 001-6871 147.35
105-3105 24.61
11818 Total : 171.96
112139 5/13/2026 23002 TORRES, IVAN TR1307 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/26 001-2101-4317 100.00
23002 Total : 100.00
112140 5/13/2026 20670 TURBODATA SYSTEMS, INC. 48565 CITATION PROCESSING/APR26 001-1204-4201 7,845.57
48566 PERMIT PROCESSING&CLOUD HOSTING/APR26
001-1204-4201 1,300.00
20670 Total : 9,145.57
112141 5/13/2026 05626 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 045-561440 ERP SOFTWARE CONV 4.14&4.21-22.26 715-1206-4201 3,912.00
045-561441 ERP SOFTWARE CONVERSION 4.23.26
715-1206-4201 652.00
05626 Total : 4,564.00
112142 5/13/2026 23529 VALENCIA, DAVID PO42624 CIT#34034195/36017085 REFUND-OVERPAID 001-3302 151.00
23529 Total : 151.00
112143 5/13/2026 23700 VAZQUEZSALAS, RAFAEL PO43586 CITATION (44017957) REFUND - VOIDED 001-3302 68.00
23700 Total : 68.00
112144 5/13/2026 13359 WITTMAN ENTERPRISES LLC 202603-C1804 AMBULANCE TRANSPORT BILLING/MAR26 001-1202-4201 4,072.81
13359 Total : 4,072.81
112145 5/13/2026 21283 YOUNG, JONATHAN PO45626 TR1259 CLOSEOUT - AXON WEEK 001-3302-4317 85.00
TR1296 SUCCESSION PRESENTATION - OHIO PD 5/19-2
001-2101-4317 110.00

05/13/2026
Check Register

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
12 3:48:04PM
Page:

Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
112145 5/13/2026 21283 YOUNG, JONATHAN (Continued) Total : 195.00 112146 5/13/2026 21393 ZUBER, BRENT TR1183 PER DIEM - USE OF FORCE TRAINING 001-2101-4312 150.00
TR1183 PARKING REIMBURSEMENT
001-2101-4317 30.00
TR1308 PER DIEM - FIREARMS COURSE 5/18-19/26
001-2101-4317 100.00
21393 Total : 280.00
84 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 1,015,147.61 84 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,015,147.61

City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: May 26, 2026
Staff Report No. 26-AS-057
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council

CASH BALANCE REPORT
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Cash Balance Report.

Executive Summary:

The Cash Balance Report provides a summary of the beginning and ending cash balances for all funds during the specific period.

Attachments:

March 2026 Cash Balance Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Anna Bailey, Accountant
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager
Concur: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager

GENERAL ACCOUNT
FUND 2/28/2026 3/31/2026

NUMBER FUND NAME BALANCE CASH ADJUSTMENTS CHECKS ADJUSTMENTS BALANCE 001 GENERAL $13,526,986.00 $3,174,501.09 ($2,636,134.48) ($1,538,073.06) ($522,358.78) $12,004,920.77 105 LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING $96,826.54 $13,768.65 ($64,059.60) (2,454.83) $44,080.76 115 STATE GAS TAX $577,958.26 $84,688.04 ($31,901.14) (1,010.43) $629,734.73 117 AB939 $213,114.98 $3,378.20 $329.91 $216,823.09
122 TYCO $1,365,806.88 $2,061.55 (12,969.40) $1,354,899.03 125 PARK REC FAC TAX $133,609.22 $114.19 (58,677.66) $75,045.75 135 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $7,206.38 $10.98 $7,217.36 138 LOMA DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $24.06 $0.03 $24.09
139 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMIN EXPENSE $1,794.42 $2.74 $1,797.16 140 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT $1.38 $1.38
145 PROPOSITION A $413,054.05 $37,714.54 $685.15 ($1,153.47) $450,300.27 146 PROPOSITION C $944,289.79 $31,283.22 ($844.70) (594.13) $974,134.18 147 MEASURE R $532,524.56 $23,453.83 $614.98 (73.10) $556,520.27 148 MEASURE M $284,409.72 $26,470.50 $473.73 $311,353.95 149 MEASURE W $1,159,765.60 $170.74 (415.49) $1,159,520.85 150 GRANTS $775,611.79 $775,611.79
152 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT $154,846.60 ($179.71) (35.01) $154,631.88 153 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES $704,661.05 $1,021.72 ($34,182.70) $671,500.07 157 FEMA/CalOES $20,991.38 $20,991.38
158 CARES ACT $0.35 $0.35
160 SEWER MAINTENANCE $2,350,405.49 $11,002.72 ($31,308.51) ($3,160.06) (6,755.81) $2,320,183.83 161 STORM DRAIN FUND $2,406,931.03 $26,135.35 ($123,072.82) (8,448.26) $2,301,545.30 170 ASSET SEIZURE/FORFEITURE $569,505.88 $849.77 ($11,868.20) $558,487.45 180 FIRE PROTECTION $22,534.60 $511.64 $35.09 $23,081.33 190 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE $1,184,940.05 ($4,253.13) ($190,837.62) (1,535.58) $988,313.72 191 RTI UNDERSEA CABLE TIDELANDS $314,874.91 $479.83 $315,354.74 201 2015 LEASE REVENUE BONDS $9,817.85 $119,178.39 ($119,178.39) $9,817.85 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $12,424,078.41 $192,812.92 ($175,241.54) ($393,276.16) (6,250.11) $12,042,123.52 313 GREENWICH VILLAGE UTILITY UNDERGROUND ($540,315.61) ($246,726.19) ($787,041.80) 609 BAYVIEW DRIVE REDEMPTION ($17,590.44) ($17,590.44)
610 LOWER PIER DISTRICT REDEMPTION $98.36 $0.16 $98.52
611 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REDEMPTION $63.62 $0.10 $63.72 612 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESERVE $5,364.10 $8.18 $5,372.28 617 MYRTLE AVE ASSESSMENT FUND ($0.42) ($0.42)
618 LOMA DRIVE ASSESSMENT FUND $0.31 $0.31
619 BAYVIEW DRIVE DISTRICT RESERVE $17,607.84 $26.84 $17,634.68 623 GREENWICH BOND RESERVE $58,405.30 $58,405.30
624 GREENWICH BOND REDEMPTION $164,045.92 (101,535.65) $62,510.27 705 INSURANCE $10,029,062.30 $22,903.36 $402,850.88 (63,481.35) (767.38) $10,390,567.81 715 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $7,985,815.00 $10,421.08 $124,706.40 ($137,645.18) ($5,291.96) $7,978,005.34 TOTAL GENERAL ACCOUNT $57,899,127.51 $55,676,042.42

BALANCE BALANCE
ACCOUNTS 2/28/2026 DEPOSITS CHARGES 3/31/2026
PAYROLL $20,785.20 $2,928,262.08 ($2,258,893.50) $690,153.78 CABLE TV DEPOSIT $16,763.73 $16,763.73
$37,548.93 $2,928,262.08 ($2,258,893.50) $706,917.51
TOTAL ALL ACCOUNTS $56,382,959.93

BANK BALANCES
INVESTMENTS GENERAL $7,354,026.03
$48,586,550.83 TRUST ACCOUNTS $723,041.42
$8,077,067.45
OUTSTANDING CHECKS ($280,658.35)
INTEREST COLLECTED $7,796,409.10
FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2026 INVESTMENTS $48,586,550.83
$54,603.20 BALANCE $56,382,959.93
APPROVED : BRANDON WALKER, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR

CASH BALANCE REPORT
MARCH 2026

City of Hermosa Beach | Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: May 26, 2026
Staff Report No. 26-AS-059
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council

REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR MARCH 2026
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2026 Financial Reports.

Executive Summary:

Attached are the March 2026 Revenue and Expenditure reports. The reports provide detail by revenue account and by department for expenditures, with summaries by fund at the end of each report.

Discussion:

As of March 2026, General Fund revenue is 65.0 percent received for 75.0 percent of the fiscal year. The General Fund revenue, particularly tax revenue, is not received incrementally. The total would reach 76.1 percent when adjusting for tax revenue.

General Fund expenditures are 77.2 percent expended for 75.0 percent of the fiscal year.

Expenditures do not necessarily occur on an incremental basis. The total would reach

71.7 percent when adjusting for encumbrances.

The Capital Improvement Project (CIP) reports group the funding for each project together, which is similar to how the projects are shown in the budget. In the regular Expenditure Report, the CIPs appear at the end of each fund; therefore, the total funding is not displayed in one place.

Attachments:

1. March 2026 Revenue Report

2. March 2026 Expenditure Report

3. March 2026 CIP Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Charlotte Newkirk, Senior Finance Analyst Concur: Anna Bailey, Accountant
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Henry Chao, Finance Manager
Reviewed by: Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director Approved: Steve Napolitano, City Manager

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3101 Current Year Secured 21,383,348.00 0.00 11,743,022.82 9,640,325.18 54.92 3102 Current Year Unsecured 678,086.00 43,781.92 701,498.96 -23,412.96 103.45 3103 Prior Year Collections 214,000.00 26,691.47 233,340.99 -19,340.99 109.04 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 300,000.00 28,949.71 252,252.17 47,747.83 84.08 3107 Transfer Tax 320,000.00 32,318.00 238,337.01 81,662.99 74.48 3108 Sales Tax 3,640,000.00 278,074.74 2,367,173.36 1,272,826.64 65.03 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 288,542.00 31,561.13 172,000.11 116,541.89 59.61 3110 Spectrum Cable TV Franchise 150,000.00 0.00 63,167.78 86,832.22 42.11 3111 Electric Franchise 179,173.00 0.00 0.00 179,173.00 0.00 3112 Gas Franchise 45,770.00 0.00 0.00 45,770.00 0.00
3113 Refuse Franchise 560,000.00 38,452.84 469,107.66 90,892.34 83.77 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 5,190,000.00 503,068.09 3,157,825.43 2,032,174.57 60.84 3115 Business License 1,215,000.00 71,296.14 844,894.66 370,105.34 69.54 3120 Utility User Tax 2,513,044.00 248,713.16 1,966,515.89 546,528.11 78.25 3122 Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 4,017,182.00 0.00 2,008,591.00 2,008,591.00 50.00 3123 Frontier Cable Franchise Fee 60,000.00 11,576.59 23,613.33 36,386.67 39.36 Total Taxes 40,754,145.00 1,314,483.79 24,241,341.17 16,512,803.83 59.48 3200 Licenses And Permits
3202 Dog Licenses 34,000.00 670.00 27,416.00 6,584.00 80.64 3204 Building Permits 690,000.00 49,024.57 542,153.76 147,846.24 78.57 3205 Electric Permits 140,000.00 7,575.00 105,147.40 34,852.60 75.11 Page: 1

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3206 Plumbing Permits 80,000.00 5,174.00 59,639.10 20,360.90 74.55 3207 Occupancy Permits 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00
3209 Garage Sales 100.00 0.00 96.00 4.00 96.00
3211 Banner Permits 1,500.00 284.00 1,165.00 335.00 77.67 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 0.00 0.00 126.00 -126.00 0.00 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 7,311.00 856.00 8,186.00 -875.00 111.97 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 412.00 110.00 538.00 -126.00 130.58 3217 Open Fire Permit 800.00 58.00 851.00 -51.00 106.38 3219 Newsrack Permits 145.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00
3226 Admin Permit - Limited Outdoor Seating 543.00 0.00 0.00 543.00 0.00 3227 Mechanical Permits 94,500.00 3,484.00 52,554.00 41,946.00 55.61 3228 Concealed Weapons Permit 1,500.00 100.00 400.00 1,100.00 26.67 3229 Private Special Event Permit 1,798.00 0.00 1,798.00 0.00 100.00 3230 Temporary Minor Special Event Permit 4,011.00 643.00 3,748.00 263.00 93.44 3236 Drone Permit Fee 1,475.00 295.00 950.00 525.00 64.41 3239 A-Frame sign Permit 196.00 0.00 208.00 -12.00 106.12 Total Licenses And Permits 1,058,591.00 68,273.57 804,976.26 253,614.74 76.04 3300 Fines & Forfeitures
3301 Municipal Court Fines 65,000.00 3,913.59 33,996.30 31,003.70 52.30 3302 Court Fines /Parking 1,880,000.00 163,653.45 1,334,640.62 545,359.38 70.99 3305 Administrative Fines 46,000.00 5,000.00 49,764.55 -3,764.55 108.18 3306 Nuisance Abatement- Restrooms 10,500.00 1,400.00 15,750.00 -5,250.00 150.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 2,001,500.00 173,967.04 1,434,151.47 567,348.53 71.65 Page: 2

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 380,081.00 17,628.36 271,565.06 108,515.94 71.45 3404 Community Center Leases 29,400.00 7,116.80 24,052.20 5,347.80 81.81 3405 Community Center Rentals 334,000.00 32,013.75 198,229.77 135,770.23 59.35 3406 Community Center Theatre 135,000.00 13,342.00 86,545.00 48,455.00 64.11 3418 Special Events 115,000.00 641.00 44,848.87 70,151.13 39.00 3422 Beach/Plaza Promotions 56,324.00 0.00 32,424.00 23,900.00 57.57 3424 EV Charging Site Kitu Credits 0.00 0.00 469.23 -469.23 0.00 3425 Ground Lease 60,631.00 4,958.26 43,075.02 17,555.98 71.04 3427 Cell Site License- Sprint 101,356.00 0.00 20,855.25 80,500.75 20.58 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon 80,530.00 0.00 29,999.11 50,530.89 37.25 3429 Inmate Phone Services 96.00 0.00 103.79 -7.79 108.11 3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 278,200.00 22,510.18 202,591.62 75,608.38 72.82 3432 Film Permits 70,000.00 4,079.00 33,106.00 36,894.00 47.29 3435 Cell Site License- Crown Castle 644.00 0.00 644.00 0.00 100.00 3450 Investment Discount 9,286.00 837.61 6,556.09 2,729.91 70.60 3475 Investment Premium -67.00 -199.92 -902.69 835.69 1347.30 Total Use Of Money & Property 1,650,481.00 102,927.04 994,162.32 656,318.68 60.23 3500 Intergovernmental/State
3507 Highway Maintenance 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 0.00 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 76,000.00 0.00 38,402.09 37,597.91 50.53 3510 POST 27,799.00 2,242.60 3,004.60 24,794.40 10.81
Page: 3

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3511 STC-Service Officer Training 6,615.00 0.00 5,176.50 1,438.50 78.25 3575 VLF Coll Excess of $14m-Rev code 11001.5 31,000.00 0.00 30,133.86 866.14 97.21 Total Intergovernmental/State 153,414.00 2,242.60 76,717.05 76,696.95 50.01 3800 Current Service Charges
3801 Residential Inspection 57,400.00 3,170.00 37,314.00 20,086.00 65.01 3802 Planning Sign Permit/Master Sign Program 16,000.00 1,646.00 14,478.00 1,522.00 90.49 3804 General Plan Maintenance Fees 94,000.00 10,053.00 80,988.00 13,012.00 86.16 3805 Amendment to Planning Entitlement 15,591.00 0.00 0.00 15,591.00 0.00 3808 Zone Variance Review 0.00 0.00 14,186.00 -14,186.00 0.00 3809 Tentative Map Review 17,031.00 3,020.00 11,774.00 5,257.00 69.13 3810 Final Map Review 2,295.00 0.00 2,656.00 -361.00 115.73 3812 Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other 23,600.00 0.00 18,195.00 5,405.00 77.10 3813 Plan Check Fees 560,000.00 16,454.13 394,494.74 165,505.26 70.45 3815 Public Works Services 120,000.00 13,783.00 113,508.89 6,491.11 94.59 3816 Utility Trench Service Connect Permit 100,000.00 67,190.27 148,941.68 -48,941.68 148.94 3817 Address Change Request Fee 4,500.00 1,248.00 6,163.00 -1,663.00 136.96 3818 Police Services 19,440.00 56.00 4,188.00 15,252.00 21.54 3821 Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 15,800.00 300.00 12,750.00 3,050.00 80.70 3823 Special Event Security/Police 25,000.00 0.00 25,079.24 -79.24 100.32 3824 500' Noticing 19,560.00 0.00 8,439.00 11,121.00 43.14 3825 Public Notice Posting 3,984.00 234.00 3,664.00 320.00 91.97 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 6,090.00 0.00 0.00 6,090.00 0.00 3831 Non-Utility Street Excavation Permit 40,000.00 3,340.00 19,620.00 20,380.00 49.05 Page: 4

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3834 Encroachment Permit 4,500.00 1,590.00 21,882.00 -17,382.00 486.27 3836 Refund Transaction Fee 4,500.00 289.00 1,878.00 2,622.00 41.73 3837 Returned Check Charge 1,000.00 126.00 372.00 628.00 37.20 3839 Photocopy Charges 0.00 45.00 260.20 -260.20 0.00
3840 Ambulance Transport 943,900.00 62,049.94 662,180.59 281,719.41 70.15 3841 Police Towing 117,000.00 12,212.00 93,894.00 23,106.00 80.25 3842 Parking Meters 3,360,000.00 502,989.31 3,286,068.58 73,931.42 97.80 3843 Parking Permits-Annual 390,000.00 134,314.00 336,815.00 53,185.00 86.36 3844 Daily Parking Permits 4,000.00 288.00 4,548.00 -548.00 113.70 3845 Lot A Revenue 1,288,376.00 126,909.49 899,654.08 388,721.92 69.83 3846 No Pier Pkg Structure Revenue 705,000.00 42,084.95 421,013.15 283,986.85 59.72 3848 Driveway Permits 2,000.00 182.00 1,566.00 434.00 78.30 3849 Guest Permits 0.00 0.00 64.00 -64.00 0.00
3850 Contractors Permits 30,000.00 1,890.00 20,034.00 9,966.00 66.78 3851 Cash Key Revenue 0.00 -5.00 -5.00 5.00 0.00
3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 75,000.00 19,225.91 50,499.66 24,500.34 67.33 3855 Bus Passes 200.00 0.00 66.00 134.00 33.00
3856 500' - 2nd Noticing 1,950.00 0.00 1,382.00 568.00 70.87 3857 Parking Plan Application 16,332.00 0.00 0.00 16,332.00 0.00 3858 Monthly Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 9,000.00 250.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 50.00 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 6,192.00 1,150.00 5,039.00 1,153.00 81.38 3865 Lot B Revenue 340,100.00 24,390.06 178,773.19 161,326.81 52.56 3867 Precise Development Plans 16,936.00 0.00 10,168.00 6,768.00 60.04 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 8,480.00 1,042.00 7,119.00 1,361.00 83.95 Page: 5

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3877 Business License Registration 16,845.00 1,825.00 13,860.00 2,985.00 82.28 3879 Business License Renewal Fee 48,000.00 3,655.00 36,366.00 11,634.00 75.76 3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 3,588.00 0.00 2,501.00 1,087.00 69.70 3884 Lot Line Adjustment 10,659.00 0.00 3,716.00 6,943.00 34.86 3888 Slope/Grade Height Determination 10,293.00 0.00 10,827.00 -534.00 105.19 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 263.00 0.00 0.00 263.00 0.00 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 770,000.00 189,149.39 500,026.21 269,973.79 64.94 3894 Other Recreation Programs 143,799.00 112,795.00 171,318.00 -27,519.00 119.14 3895 Zoning Information Letters 2,310.00 248.00 4,160.00 -1,850.00 180.09 3899 Condo - CUP/PDP 36,962.00 6,519.00 31,715.00 5,247.00 85.80 Total Current Service Charges 9,507,476.00 1,365,708.45 7,698,700.21 1,808,775.79 80.98 3900 Other Revenue
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 164.04 325.22 -325.22 0.00 3903 Contributions Non Govt 100,000.00 4,389.46 137,961.81 -37,961.81 137.96 3904 General Miscellaneous 0.00 5,956.77 164,460.34 -164,460.34 0.00 3907 Pkg Str Utility Reimb From Beach House 10,000.00 383.91 6,420.93 3,579.07 64.21 3908 Hermosa Sr Ctr Donations/Memberships 4,700.00 329.00 3,232.50 1,467.50 68.78 3909 Concert Series Doantions/Sponsorships 3,500.00 0.00 3,145.06 354.94 89.86 3914 Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 3938 Solid Waste Contract Admin Fee 0.00 5,746.99 45,975.92 -45,975.92 0.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 536,166.00 30,087.84 445,902.56 90,263.44 83.17 3960 Frontier PEG Grant-formerly Verizon 10,000.00 2,315.31 4,722.65 5,277.35 47.23 3968 Spectrum PEG Grant-formerly TWC 30,000.00 0.00 12,861.53 17,138.47 42.87 Page: 6

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
Total Other Revenue 734,366.00 49,373.32 825,008.52 -90,642.52 112.34 6800 Current Service Charges Continued
6801 Mural Review 2,248.00 598.00 598.00 1,650.00 26.60 6804 Temporary Use Permit 1,146.00 0.00 0.00 1,146.00 0.00 6809 Categorical Exemption 4,540.00 482.00 3,061.00 1,479.00 67.42 6810 Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 7,080.00 -855.00 8,640.00 -1,560.00 122.03 6811 Landscape Plan Review 2,685.00 0.00 0.00 2,685.00 0.00 6813 Director's Determination 846.00 0.00 2,445.00 -1,599.00 289.01 6818 New/Modified Business Zoning Review 15,400.00 1,555.00 10,289.00 5,111.00 66.81 6819 Historic Resource Review 998.00 0.00 0.00 998.00 0.00 6821 Solar Plan Check/Inspection 20,000.00 900.00 13,998.15 6,001.85 69.99 6822 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 490.00 0.00 158.00 332.00 32.24 6825 Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection 15,483.00 1,650.00 22,340.20 -6,857.20 144.29 6826 Light Industry - NPDES Inspection 0.00 0.00 518.00 -518.00 0.00 6828 Public Improvement Plan Check 60,000.00 5,732.00 76,165.26 -16,165.26 126.94 6832 DUI Collision Response 2,000.00 650.00 3,344.14 -1,344.14 167.21 6834 Citation Sign-off 1,320.00 62.00 1,094.00 226.00 82.88 6837 Deceased Animal Pickup 148.00 0.00 0.00 148.00 0.00 6840 Multiple Dog Review 276.00 0.00 0.00 276.00 0.00
6849 Traffic Plan Review 2,250.00 675.00 2,925.00 -675.00 130.00 6851 Bus. License State Mandated Fee (CASp) 7,800.00 870.00 7,720.60 79.40 98.98 6852 Tobacco Retailer Renewal 3,000.00 0.00 2,996.00 4.00 99.87 6860 Refuse Lien Fees/Athens 900.00 0.00 12,123.30 -11,223.30 1347.03 Page: 7

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
6861 Oversized Vehicle Permit 324.00 56.00 542.00 -218.00 167.28 6862 Athens Enclosure Support Fee 0.00 0.00 4,926.36 -4,926.36 0.00 6867 Credit Card Processing Fee 52,000.00 5,679.65 50,828.44 1,171.56 97.75 6871 Sewer Service Charge Rebate -14,000.00 -1,031.45 -6,061.63 -7,938.37 43.30 6873 Impound Fee- Bicycle, Scooters & Wheeled 0.00 0.00 2,232.00 -2,232.00 0.00 6874 Limited Live Entertainment Permit Fee 998.00 0.00 0.00 998.00 0.00 6881 Public Tree Removal Permit 1,000.00 988.00 1,946.00 -946.00 194.60 6882 Sidewalk Vending Permit 409.00 0.00 0.00 409.00 0.00 6883 Short-term Vacation Rental Permit 13,160.00 0.00 3,632.00 9,528.00 27.60 6884 M-1 Limited Event Permit 544.00 0.00 0.00 544.00 0.00 6885 Temporary Outdoor Dining/Retail Permit 1,826.00 0.00 0.00 1,826.00 0.00 6887 Minor Planning Sign Review 274.00 0.00 0.00 274.00 0.00 6890 Outdoor Dining Encroachments 584,191.00 25,991.40 523,575.90 60,615.10 89.62 6891 Employee Lot C, 24 Hour Permit 84,400.00 5,325.00 51,450.00 32,950.00 60.96 6892 Employee Lot C, Daytime Permit 67,998.00 4,788.00 45,618.67 22,379.33 67.09 Total Current Service Charges Continued 941,734.00 54,115.60 847,105.39 94,628.61 89.95 Total General Fund 56,801,707.00 3,131,091.41 36,922,162.39 19,879,544.61 65.00 Page: 8

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
105 Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3101 Current Year Secured 458,769.00 0.00 266,987.08 191,781.92 58.20 3103 Prior Year Collections 0.00 0.00 5,115.41 -5,115.41 0.00 3105 Assessment Rebates 0.00 -246.10 -1,402.77 1,402.77 0.00 Total Taxes 458,769.00 -246.10 270,699.72 188,069.28 59.01 3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 9,288.00 64.73 995.41 8,292.59 10.72 3450 Investment Discount 22.00 3.08 24.64 -2.64 112.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.72 -3.65 3.65 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 9,310.00 67.09 1,016.40 8,293.60 10.92 3900 Other Revenue
3955 Operating Transfers In 400,335.00 33,361.25 300,251.25 100,083.75 75.00 Total Other Revenue 400,335.00 33,361.25 300,251.25 100,083.75 75.00 Total Lightg/Landscapg Dist Fund 868,414.00 33,182.24 571,967.37 296,446.63 65.86 Page: 9

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
115 State Gas Tax Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 23,391.00 924.72 8,734.86 14,656.14 37.34 3450 Investment Discount 682.00 43.94 265.28 416.72 38.90 3475 Investment Premium -5.00 -10.49 -41.07 36.07 821.40 Total Use Of Money & Property 24,068.00 958.17 8,959.07 15,108.93 37.22 3500 Intergovernmental/State
3501 Section 2106 Allocation 75,939.00 6,361.25 48,722.06 27,216.94 64.16 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 173,697.00 10,711.87 104,582.63 69,114.37 60.21 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 100.00 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 127,397.00 10,223.18 80,001.39 47,395.61 62.80 3513 Sec 2103 Higher Mtr Veh Excise Tax(HUTA) 184,586.00 15,802.28 127,442.87 57,143.13 69.04 3567 Road Maintenance Rehab Account 533,814.00 41,589.46 312,688.58 221,125.42 58.58 Total Intergovernmental/State 1,099,433.00 84,688.04 677,437.53 421,995.47 61.62 Total State Gas Tax Fund 1,123,501.00 85,646.21 686,396.60 437,104.40 61.09 Page: 10

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
116 TDA 3 Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3500 Intergovernmental/State
3522 TDA Article 3 Local 15,257.00 0.00 0.00 15,257.00 0.00 Total TDA 3 Fund 15,257.00 0.00 0.00 15,257.00 0.00
Page: 11

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
12 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
117 AB939 Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 5,217.00 318.39 5,739.79 -522.79 110.02 3450 Investment Discount 187.00 15.13 109.98 77.02 58.81 3475 Investment Premium -1.00 -3.61 -15.88 14.88 1588.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 5,403.00 329.91 5,833.89 -430.89 107.98 3800 Current Service Charges
3860 AB939 Surcharge 64,000.00 3,378.20 41,947.41 22,052.59 65.54 Total Current Service Charges 64,000.00 3,378.20 41,947.41 22,052.59 65.54 Total AB939 Fund 69,403.00 3,708.11 47,781.30 21,621.70 68.85 Page: 12

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
13 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
121 Prop A Open Space Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3600 Intergovernmental/County
3608 Maintenance Allocation 18,000.00 0.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 Total Prop A Open Space Fund 18,000.00 0.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 Page: 13

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
14 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
122 Tyco Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 55,046.00 1,989.57 58,322.29 -3,276.29 105.95 3426 Easement Agreement 343,824.00 0.00 257,868.36 85,955.64 75.00 3450 Investment Discount 1,527.00 94.54 1,054.99 472.01 69.09 3475 Investment Premium -11.00 -22.56 -135.31 124.31 1230.09 Total Use Of Money & Property 400,386.00 2,061.55 317,110.33 83,275.67 79.20 3900 Other Revenue
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Tyco Fund 400,386.00 2,061.55 317,110.33 83,275.67 79.20 Page: 14

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
15 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
125 Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 57,526.00 0.00 28,323.00 29,203.00 49.24 Total Taxes 57,526.00 0.00 28,323.00 29,203.00 49.24
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 8,305.00 110.20 8,543.02 -238.02 102.87 3450 Investment Discount 254.00 5.24 167.09 86.91 65.78 3475 Investment Premium -2.00 -1.25 -19.93 17.93 996.50 Total Use Of Money & Property 8,557.00 114.19 8,690.18 -133.18 101.56 3900 Other Revenue
3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 60,000.00 0.00 47,398.00 12,602.00 79.00 Total Other Revenue 60,000.00 0.00 47,398.00 12,602.00 79.00 Total Park/Rec Facility Tax Fund 126,083.00 114.19 84,411.18 41,671.82 66.95 Page: 15

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
16 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
135 Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 10.60 205.91 -205.91 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.50 3.99 -3.99 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.12 -0.55 0.55 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 10.98 209.35 -209.35 0.00 3900 Other Revenue
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Bayview Dr Dist Admin Exp Fund 0.00 10.98 209.35 -209.35 0.00 Page: 16

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
17 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
138 Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.03 0.56 -0.56 0.00
Total Loma Dist Admin Exp Fund 0.00 0.03 0.56 -0.56 0.00 Page: 17

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
18 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
139 Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 2.64 52.08 -52.08 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.13 1.00 -1.00 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.03 -0.13 0.13 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 2.74 52.95 -52.95 0.00 3900 Other Revenue
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 0.00 2.74 52.95 -52.95 0.00 Page: 18

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
19 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
140 Community Dev Block Grant
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.03 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.03 0.00 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal
3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 184,000.00 0.00 0.00 184,000.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 184,000.00 0.00 0.00 184,000.00 0.00 Total Community Dev Block Grant 184,000.00 0.00 0.03 183,999.97 0.00 Page: 19

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
20 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
145 Proposition A Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3117 Proposition A Transit 493,759.00 37,714.54 383,808.71 109,950.29 77.73 Total Taxes 493,759.00 37,714.54 383,808.71 109,950.29 77.73 3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 17,721.00 661.23 2,532.42 15,188.58 14.29 3450 Investment Discount 442.00 31.42 174.99 267.01 39.59 3475 Investment Premium -3.00 -7.50 -27.41 24.41 913.67 Total Use Of Money & Property 18,160.00 685.15 2,680.00 15,480.00 14.76 3800 Current Service Charges
3853 Dial-A-Taxi Program 0.00 53.00 257.00 -257.00 0.00 Total Current Service Charges 0.00 53.00 257.00 -257.00 0.00 Total Proposition A Fund 511,919.00 38,452.69 386,745.71 125,173.29 75.55 Page: 20

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
21 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
146 Proposition C Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3118 Proposition C Local Return 409,560.00 31,283.22 318,358.42 91,201.58 77.73 Total Taxes 409,560.00 31,283.22 318,358.42 91,201.58 77.73 3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 24,999.00 1,430.45 27,334.81 -2,335.81 109.34 3450 Investment Discount 1,009.00 67.97 526.23 482.77 52.15 3475 Investment Premium -7.00 -16.22 -73.35 66.35 1047.86 Total Use Of Money & Property 26,001.00 1,482.20 27,787.69 -1,786.69 106.87 Total Proposition C Fund 435,561.00 32,765.42 346,146.11 89,414.89 79.47 Page: 21

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
22 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
147 Measure R Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 307,170.00 23,453.83 238,724.03 68,445.97 77.72 Total Taxes 307,170.00 23,453.83 238,724.03 68,445.97 77.72 3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 7,287.00 817.21 8,614.85 -1,327.85 118.22 3450 Investment Discount 611.00 38.83 268.61 342.39 43.96 3475 Investment Premium -4.00 -9.27 -38.33 34.33 958.25 Total Use Of Money & Property 7,894.00 846.77 8,845.13 -951.13 112.05 3900 Other Revenue
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Measure R Fund 315,064.00 24,300.60 247,569.16 67,494.84 78.58 Page: 22

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
23 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
148 Measure M
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3131 Measure M Local Return Funds 348,126.00 26,470.50 270,393.26 77,732.74 77.67 Total Taxes 348,126.00 26,470.50 270,393.26 77,732.74 77.67 3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 7,291.00 457.20 1,588.31 5,702.69 21.78 3450 Investment Discount 290.00 21.72 111.21 178.79 38.35 3475 Investment Premium -2.00 -5.19 -18.32 16.32 916.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 7,579.00 473.73 1,681.20 5,897.80 22.18 Total Measure M 355,705.00 26,944.23 272,074.46 83,630.54 76.49 Page: 23

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
24 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
149 Measure W Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3132 Measure W Local Returns 155,879.00 0.00 155,879.60 -0.60 100.00 Total Taxes 155,879.00 0.00 155,879.60 -0.60 100.00
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 28,454.00 1,702.67 31,268.60 -2,814.60 109.89 3450 Investment Discount 526.00 80.90 606.64 -80.64 115.33 3475 Investment Premium -4.00 -19.31 -86.15 82.15 2153.75 Total Use Of Money & Property 28,976.00 1,764.26 31,789.09 -2,813.09 109.71 3600 Intergovernmental/County
Total Intergovernmental/County 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Measure W Fund 184,855.00 1,764.26 187,668.69 -2,813.69 101.52 Page: 24

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
25 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
150 Grants Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3500 Intergovernmental/State
3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 65,000.00 0.00 0.00 65,000.00 0.00 3593 CalRecycle Grant 7,500.00 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00
3594 State Dept of Parks & Rec Specific Grant 460,000.00 0.00 460,000.00 0.00 100.00 3596 CalRecycle Rubber Grant 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 100.00 3597 MWD Turf Removal Grant 96,242.00 0.00 0.00 96,242.00 0.00 3598 State Dept of Parks & Rec Reimb 189,849.00 0.00 0.00 189,849.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/State 868,591.00 0.00 510,000.00 358,591.00 58.72 3700 Intergovernmental/Federal
3752 Real Time Crime Center Grant 963,000.00 0.00 145,934.10 817,065.90 15.15 3757 CalOES Grant - Tsunami Siren 70,300.00 0.00 0.00 70,300.00 0.00 3758 CalOES Grant - Education 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 4,500.00 0.00 3760 Mobile Crisis Response Team 416,433.00 0.00 254,739.26 161,693.74 61.17 3763 STEP (Selective Traffic Enf Prog) Grant 80,000.00 0.00 21,821.43 58,178.57 27.28 Total Intergovernmental/Federal 1,534,233.00 0.00 422,494.79 1,111,738.21 27.54 3900 Other Revenue
3921 BCHD Opioid Revenue 0.00 449.98 8,671.67 -8,671.67 0.00 3926 Opioid Settlement- Distributor 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 3927 Opioid Settlement- NOAT* 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 3928 Opioid Settlement- Janssen 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 3964 OPC Sea Level Rise Analysis Grant 583,307.00 0.00 0.00 583,307.00 0.00 3975 RPOSD Meas A Grant 0.00 0.00 58,407.11 -58,407.11 0.00 Page: 25

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
26 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
150 Grants Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
Total Other Revenue 633,307.00 449.98 67,078.78 566,228.22 10.59 Total Grants Fund 3,036,131.00 449.98 999,573.57 2,036,557.43 32.92 Page: 26

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
27 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
152 Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 3,869.00 227.07 4,244.14 -375.14 109.70 3450 Investment Discount 76.00 10.79 81.08 -5.08 106.68 3475 Investment Premium -1.00 -2.58 -11.56 10.56 1156.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 3,944.00 235.28 4,313.66 -369.66 109.37 3500 Intergovernmental/State
3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 25,000.00 0.00 12,394.24 12,605.76 49.58 Total Intergovernmental/State 25,000.00 0.00 12,394.24 12,605.76 49.58 Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 28,944.00 235.28 16,707.90 12,236.10 57.72 Page: 27

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
28 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
153 Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF)
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 150,000.00 0.00 201,536.61 -51,536.61 134.36 Total Taxes 150,000.00 0.00 201,536.61 -51,536.61 134.36 3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 17,093.00 986.05 18,754.67 -1,661.67 109.72 3450 Investment Discount 363.00 46.85 355.23 7.77 97.86 3475 Investment Premium -3.00 -11.18 -52.02 49.02 1734.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 17,453.00 1,021.72 19,057.88 -1,604.88 109.20 Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund (SLESF) 167,453.00 1,021.72 220,594.49 -53,141.49 131.74 Page: 28

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
29 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
157 FEMA/Cal OES
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3700 Intergovernmental/Federal
3755 FEMA- Public Assistance Covid-19 0.00 0.00 20,991.38 -20,991.38 0.00 Total FEMA/Cal OES 0.00 0.00 20,991.38 -20,991.38 0.00
Page: 29

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
30 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
160 Sewer Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 71,512.00 3,407.02 77,171.27 -5,659.27 107.91 3450 Investment Discount 2,950.00 161.89 1,562.61 1,387.39 52.97 3475 Investment Premium -21.00 -38.64 -202.73 181.73 965.38 Total Use Of Money & Property 74,441.00 3,530.27 78,531.15 -4,090.15 105.49 3500 Intergovernmental/State
Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3600 Intergovernmental/County
3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 0.00 10,835.72 10,835.72 -10,835.72 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/County 0.00 10,835.72 10,835.72 -10,835.72 0.00 3800 Current Service Charges
3828 Sewer Connection Fee 8,000.00 0.00 4,935.00 3,065.00 61.69 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 1,800.00 167.00 2,278.00 -478.00 126.56 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 17,000.00 0.00 16,307.27 692.73 95.93 Total Current Service Charges 26,800.00 167.00 23,520.27 3,279.73 87.76 3900 Other Revenue
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6800 Current Service Charges Continued
6861 Sewer Service Charge 1,247,000.00 0.00 770,654.04 476,345.96 61.80 Page: 30

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
31 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
160 Sewer Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
Total Current Service Charges Continued 1,247,000.00 0.00 770,654.04 476,345.96 61.80 Total Sewer Fund 1,348,241.00 14,532.99 883,541.18 464,699.82 65.53 Page: 31

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
32 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
161 Storm Drains Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 85,330.00 3,379.65 91,016.38 -5,686.38 106.66 3450 Investment Discount 1,850.00 160.58 1,344.35 505.65 72.67 3475 Investment Premium -13.00 -38.33 -184.61 171.61 1420.08 Total Use Of Money & Property 87,167.00 3,501.90 92,176.12 -5,009.12 105.75 3600 Intergovernmental/County
3602 Beach Outlet Maint. 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 Total Intergovernmental/County 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 3900 Other Revenue
3955 Operating Transfers In 700,000.00 58,333.33 524,999.97 175,000.03 75.00 Total Other Revenue 700,000.00 58,333.33 524,999.97 175,000.03 75.00 Total Storm Drains Fund 812,167.00 61,835.23 617,176.09 194,990.91 75.99 Page: 32

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
33 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
170 Asset Seizure/Forft Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3300 Fines & Forfeitures
3308 Department of Treasury Forfeited Funds 0.00 0.00 126,711.61 -126,711.61 0.00 Total Fines & Forfeitures 0.00 0.00 126,711.61 -126,711.61 0.00 3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 24,825.00 820.10 15,531.91 9,293.09 62.57 3450 Investment Discount 413.00 38.97 309.86 103.14 75.03 3475 Investment Premium -3.00 -9.30 -43.86 40.86 1462.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 25,235.00 849.77 15,797.91 9,437.09 62.60 Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 25,235.00 849.77 142,509.52 -117,274.52 564.73 Page: 33

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
34 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
180 Fire Protection Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 166.00 33.89 558.46 -392.46 336.42 3450 Investment Discount 0.00 1.58 10.48 -10.48 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.38 -1.55 1.55 0.00
Total Use Of Money & Property 166.00 35.09 567.39 -401.39 341.80 3900 Other Revenue
3912 Fire Flow Fee 4,000.00 511.64 7,393.87 -3,393.87 184.85 Total Other Revenue 4,000.00 511.64 7,393.87 -3,393.87 184.85 Total Fire Protection Fund 4,166.00 546.73 7,961.26 -3,795.26 191.10 Page: 34

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
35 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
190 RTI Undersea Cable
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 34,343.00 1,451.27 35,954.69 -1,611.69 104.69 3426 Easement Cable 1-2nd Street 93,900.00 0.00 70,425.00 23,475.00 75.00 3427 Easement Cable 2-Longfellow 75,120.00 0.00 56,340.00 18,780.00 75.00 3428 Easement Cable 3-25th St 71,990.00 0.00 53,992.50 17,997.50 75.00 3450 Investment Discount 839.00 68.96 664.28 174.72 79.18 3475 Investment Premium -6.00 -16.46 -91.16 85.16 1519.33 Total Use Of Money & Property 276,186.00 1,503.77 217,285.31 58,900.69 78.67 3900 Other Revenue
Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total RTI Undersea Cable 276,186.00 1,503.77 217,285.31 58,900.69 78.67 Page: 35

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
36 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
191 RTI Tidelands
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 12,301.00 463.08 9,770.88 2,530.12 79.43 3450 Investment Discount 301.00 22.00 198.59 102.41 65.98 3475 Investment Premium -2.00 -5.25 -26.38 24.38 1319.00 Total RTI Tidelands 12,600.00 479.83 9,943.09 2,656.91 78.91 Page: 36

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
37 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
201 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3900 Other Revenue
3955 Operating Transfers In 728,200.00 119,178.39 714,139.83 14,060.17 98.07 Total 2015 Lease Revenue Bonds 728,200.00 119,178.39 714,139.83 14,060.17 98.07 Page: 37

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
38 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
301 Capital Improvement Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 337,151.00 17,683.04 366,717.38 -29,566.38 108.77 3450 Investment Discount 9,257.00 840.21 6,837.83 2,419.17 73.87 3475 Investment Premium -67.00 -200.54 -975.91 908.91 1456.58 Total Use Of Money & Property 346,341.00 18,322.71 372,579.30 -26,238.30 107.58 3500 Intergovernmental/State
Total Intergovernmental/State 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3900 Other Revenue
3908 Donations to CIP Fund 14,224.00 14,224.00 14,224.00 0.00 100.00 3955 Operating Transfers In 90,000.00 7,500.00 67,500.00 22,500.00 75.00 Total Other Revenue 104,224.00 21,724.00 81,724.00 22,500.00 78.41 Total Capital Improvement Fund 450,565.00 40,046.71 454,303.30 -3,738.30 100.83 Page: 38

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
39 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
313 Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 57,943.95 -57,943.95 0.00 Total Use Of Money & Property 0.00 0.00 57,943.95 -57,943.95 0.00 3900 Other Revenue
3922 Other Financing Sources 4,031,600.00 0.00 0.00 4,031,600.00 0.00 3940 Property Owner Cash Contribution 0.00 0.00 367,853.03 -367,853.03 0.00 3941 Bond Financed Contribution Revenue 0.00 0.00 3,336,714.01 -3,336,714.01 0.00 Total Other Revenue 4,031,600.00 0.00 3,704,567.04 327,032.96 91.89 Total Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrnd Im 4,031,600.00 0.00 3,762,510.99 269,089.01 93.33 Page: 39

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
40 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
609 Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.00 291.80 -291.80 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.00 8.21 -8.21 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 -0.57 0.57 0.00
Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 2004-2 0.00 0.00 299.44 -299.44 0.00 Page: 40

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
41 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
610 Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.15 97.37 -97.37 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.01 1.59 -1.59 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 -0.18 0.18 0.00
Total Lwr Pier Dist Redemption Fund 0.00 0.16 98.78 -98.78 0.00 Page: 41

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
42 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
611 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 0.09 62.91 -62.91 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 0.01 1.02 -1.02 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 0.00 -0.10 0.10 0.00
Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 0.00 0.10 63.83 -63.83 0.00 Page: 42

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
43 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
612 Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 138.00 7.89 155.70 -17.70 112.83
3450 Investment Discount 3.00 0.38 2.99 0.01 99.67
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.09 -0.43 0.43 0.00
Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 141.00 8.18 158.26 -17.26 112.24 Page: 43

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
44 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
619 Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3400 Use Of Money & Property
3401 Interest Income 0.00 25.90 511.06 -511.06 0.00
3450 Investment Discount 0.00 1.23 9.75 -9.75 0.00
3475 Investment Premium 0.00 -0.29 -1.35 1.35 0.00
Total Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 2004-2 0.00 26.84 519.46 -519.46 0.00 Page: 44

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
45 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
623 Greenwich Bond Reserve
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3100 Taxes
Total Greenwich Bond Reserve 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page: 45

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
46 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
705 Insurance Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3800 Current Service Charges
3880 Insurance Service Charges 4,338,529.00 361,545.00 3,253,905.00 1,084,624.00 75.00 Total Current Service Charges 4,338,529.00 361,545.00 3,253,905.00 1,084,624.00 75.00 3900 Other Revenue
3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0.00 0.00 2,400.00 -2,400.00 0.00 3904 General Miscellaneous 107,754.00 22,903.36 108,882.37 -1,128.37 101.05 3955 Operating Transfers In 317,833.00 0.00 317,833.00 0.00 100.00 Total Other Revenue 425,587.00 22,903.36 429,115.37 -3,528.37 100.83 Total Insurance Fund 4,764,116.00 384,448.36 3,683,020.37 1,081,095.63 77.31 Page: 46

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
47 10:44AM
revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
715 Equipment Replacement Fund
Account Number
Adjusted
Estimate Revenues
Year-to-date
Revenues Balance
Prct
Rcvd
3800 Current Service Charges
3822 Building Maintenance Service Charges 102,557.00 8,545.00 76,905.00 25,652.00 74.99 3885 Comm Equip/Business Mach Charges 1,014,968.00 84,582.00 761,238.00 253,730.00 75.00 3889 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Charges 745,468.00 62,122.34 559,101.06 186,366.94 75.00 Total Current Service Charges 1,862,993.00 155,249.34 1,397,244.06 465,748.94 75.00 3900 Other Revenue
3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 0.00 0.00 92,064.69 -92,064.69 0.00 Total Other Revenue 0.00 0.00 92,064.69 -92,064.69 0.00 6800 Current Service Charges Continued
6866 Records Technology Fee 90,000.00 10,299.28 90,599.49 -599.49 100.67 Total Current Service Charges Continued 90,000.00 10,299.28 90,599.49 -599.49 100.67 Total Equipment Replacement Fund 1,952,993.00 165,548.62 1,579,908.24 373,084.76 80.90 Grand Total 79,048,593.00 4,170,757.32 53,401,602.48 25,646,990.52 67.56 Page: 47

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1101 City Council
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1101-4100 Salaries and Benefits
1101-4102 Regular Salaries 56,735.00 3,242.06 40,293.96 0.00 16,441.04 71.02 1101-4111 Accrual Cash In 2,138.00 0.00 2,137.62 0.00 0.38 99.98 1101-4112 Part Time/Temporary 50,880.00 4,240.00 38,160.00 0.00 12,720.00 75.00 1101-4180 Retirement 60,902.00 4,803.31 44,628.11 0.00 16,273.89 73.28 1101-4188 Employee Benefits 66,679.00 5,141.95 48,906.85 0.00 17,772.15 73.35 1101-4189 Medicare Benefits 1,596.00 110.16 1,173.28 0.00 422.72 73.51 Total Salaries and Benefits 238,930.00 17,537.48 175,299.82 0.00 63,630.18 73.37 1101-4200 Contract Services
1101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 1101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1101-4304 Telephone 250.00 16.34 107.65 0.00 142.35 43.06 1101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 17,000.00 867.65 7,228.56 908.67 8,862.77 47.87 1101-4315 Membership 38,343.00 0.00 38,497.17 0.00 -154.17 100.40 1101-4317 Conference/Training 28,000.00 1,872.71 9,796.84 150.00 18,053.16 35.52 1101-4319 Special Events 37,400.00 4,911.00 20,078.57 0.00 17,321.43 53.69 1101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 3,620.00 302.00 2,718.00 0.00 902.00 75.08 1101-4396 Insurance User Charges 9,896.00 825.00 7,425.00 0.00 2,471.00 75.03 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 134,509.00 8,794.70 85,851.79 1,058.67 47,598.54 64.61 Total City Council 376,439.00 26,332.18 261,151.61 1,058.67 114,228.72 69.66 Page: 1

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1121 City Clerk
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1121-4100 Salaries and Benefits
1121-4102 Regular Salaries 387,170.00 12,002.70 274,336.04 0.00 112,833.96 70.86 1121-4106 Regular Overtime 0.00 2,123.29 2,123.29 0.00 -2,123.29 0.00 1121-4111 Accrual Cash In 22,647.00 6,928.19 29,574.77 0.00 -6,927.77 130.59 1121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 9,733.00 5,904.00 9,471.00 0.00 262.00 97.31 1121-4180 Retirement 42,764.00 1,375.99 25,080.30 0.00 17,683.70 58.65 1121-4188 Employee Benefits 72,449.00 2,533.42 56,430.46 0.00 16,018.54 77.89 1121-4189 Medicare Benefits 6,066.00 394.39 4,701.35 0.00 1,364.65 77.50 Total Salaries and Benefits 540,829.00 31,261.98 401,717.21 0.00 139,111.79 74.28 1121-4200 Contract Services
1121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 121,350.00 17,850.50 120,416.52 54,585.58 -53,652.10 144.21 Total Contract Services 121,350.00 17,850.50 120,416.52 54,585.58 -53,652.10 144.21 1121-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1121-4304 Telephone 800.00 86.64 590.59 0.00 209.41 73.82 1121-4305 Office Oper Supplies 10,000.00 244.30 4,492.41 224.23 5,283.36 47.17 1121-4315 Membership 1,550.00 0.00 1,830.00 300.00 -580.00 137.42 1121-4317 Conference/Training 10,000.00 0.00 2,805.96 0.00 7,194.04 28.06 1121-4323 Public Noticing 18,000.00 425.76 5,793.10 0.00 12,206.90 32.18 1121-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 8,566.00 714.00 6,426.00 0.00 2,140.00 75.02 1121-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 612.00 51.00 459.00 0.00 153.00 75.00 1121-4396 Insurance User Charges 29,948.00 2,496.00 22,464.00 0.00 7,484.00 75.01 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 79,476.00 4,017.70 44,861.06 524.23 34,090.71 57.11 1121-5400 Equipment/Furniture
1121-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 9,130.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,130.00 0.00 Total Equipment/Furniture 9,130.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,130.00 0.00 Total City Clerk 750,785.00 53,130.18 566,994.79 55,109.81 128,680.40 82.86 Page: 2

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1131 City Attorney
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1131-4200 Contract Services
1131-4201 Contract Serv/Private 680,000.00 52,760.41 499,435.37 0.00 180,564.63 73.45 Total City Attorney 680,000.00 52,760.41 499,435.37 0.00 180,564.63 73.45 Page: 3

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1132 City Prosecutor
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1132-4200 Contract Services
1132-4201 Contract Serv/Private 221,328.00 18,444.00 147,552.00 73,776.00 0.00 100.00 Total Contract Services 221,328.00 18,444.00 147,552.00 73,776.00 0.00 100.00 1132-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1132-4304 Telephone 200.00 16.34 107.65 0.00 92.35 53.83 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 200.00 16.34 107.65 0.00 92.35 53.83 Total City Prosecutor 221,528.00 18,460.34 147,659.65 73,776.00 92.35 99.96 Page: 4

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1141 City Treasurer
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1141-4100 Salaries and Benefits
1141-4112 Part Time/Temporary 6,360.00 530.00 4,770.00 0.00 1,590.00 75.00 1141-4180 Retirement 524.00 45.21 406.89 0.00 117.11 77.65 1141-4188 Employee Benefits 22,410.00 1,928.33 16,624.84 0.00 5,785.16 74.18 1141-4189 Medicare Benefits 92.00 7.68 69.12 0.00 22.88 75.13 Total Salaries and Benefits 29,386.00 2,511.22 21,870.85 0.00 7,515.15 74.43 1141-4200 Contract Services
1141-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,775.00 0.00 5,879.29 3,750.00 145.71 98.51 Total Contract Services 9,775.00 0.00 5,879.29 3,750.00 145.71 98.51 1141-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1141-4304 Telephone 604.00 62.13 429.15 0.00 174.85 71.05 1141-4305 Office Oper Supplies 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 1141-4315 Membership 110.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 -15.00 113.64 1141-4317 Conference/Training 2,405.00 0.00 360.00 0.00 2,045.00 14.97 1141-4396 Insurance User Charges 1,133.00 94.00 846.00 0.00 287.00 74.67 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 4,372.00 156.13 1,760.15 0.00 2,611.85 40.26 Total City Treasurer 43,533.00 2,667.35 29,510.29 3,750.00 10,272.71 76.40 Page: 5

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1201 City Manager
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1201-4100 Salaries and Benefits
1201-4102 Regular Salaries 1,144,427.00 96,137.44 859,514.61 0.00 284,912.39 75.10 1201-4111 Accrual Cash In 21,532.00 0.00 21,531.84 0.00 0.16 100.00 1201-4112 Part Time/Temporary 14,880.00 492.00 5,772.00 0.00 9,108.00 38.79 1201-4180 Retirement 163,869.00 14,349.28 129,135.90 0.00 34,733.10 78.80 1201-4188 Employee Benefits 131,059.00 11,525.99 92,118.86 0.00 38,940.14 70.29 1201-4189 Medicare Benefits 17,175.00 1,413.44 12,995.77 0.00 4,179.23 75.67 Total Salaries and Benefits 1,492,942.00 123,918.15 1,121,068.98 0.00 371,873.02 75.09 1201-4200 Contract Services
1201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 704,668.00 74,337.01 423,387.53 262,577.35 18,703.12 97.35 1201-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 78,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78,500.00 0.00 Total Contract Services 783,168.00 74,337.01 423,387.53 262,577.35 97,203.12 87.59 1201-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1201-4304 Telephone 5,000.00 352.05 4,204.00 540.75 255.25 94.90 1201-4305 Office Oper Supplies 15,800.00 958.23 6,006.56 160.11 9,633.33 39.03 1201-4315 Membership 3,125.00 1,418.88 2,438.88 100.00 586.12 81.24 1201-4317 Conference/Training 28,230.00 2,103.70 9,530.16 75.00 18,624.84 34.02 1201-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 62,527.00 5,211.00 46,899.00 0.00 15,628.00 75.01 1201-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 4,321.00 360.00 3,240.00 0.00 1,081.00 74.98 1201-4396 Insurance User Charges 97,607.00 8,134.00 73,206.00 0.00 24,401.00 75.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 216,610.00 18,537.86 145,524.60 875.86 70,209.54 67.59 1201-5400 Equipment/Furniture
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City Manager 2,492,720.00 216,793.02 1,689,981.11 263,453.21 539,285.68 78.37 Page: 6

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1202 Finance Administration
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1202-4100 Salaries and Benefits
1202-4102 Regular Salaries 758,831.00 62,717.66 562,551.28 0.00 196,279.72 74.13 1202-4106 Regular Overtime 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 1202-4111 Accrual Cash In 16,838.00 0.00 16,838.39 0.00 -0.39 100.00 1202-4112 Part Time/Temporary 109,000.00 9,622.80 66,305.31 0.00 42,694.69 60.83 1202-4180 Retirement 147,705.00 13,615.05 120,288.55 0.00 27,416.45 81.44 1202-4188 Employee Benefits 95,074.00 7,882.73 69,198.03 0.00 25,875.97 72.78 1202-4189 Medicare Benefits 12,497.00 1,095.79 9,830.44 0.00 2,666.56 78.66 Total Salaries and Benefits 1,141,945.00 94,934.03 845,012.00 0.00 296,933.00 74.00 1202-4200 Contract Services
1202-4201 Contract Serv/Private 216,150.00 3,000.00 86,587.51 25,813.07 103,749.42 52.00 Total Contract Services 216,150.00 3,000.00 86,587.51 25,813.07 103,749.42 52.00 1202-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1202-4304 Telephone 1,000.00 127.47 859.67 0.00 140.33 85.97 1202-4305 Office Oper Supplies 7,500.00 436.55 6,418.94 0.00 1,081.06 85.59 1202-4315 Membership 1,030.00 120.00 275.00 0.00 755.00 26.70 1202-4317 Conference/Training 6,800.00 3,080.15 3,680.15 550.00 2,569.85 62.21 1202-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 7,299.00 608.00 5,472.00 0.00 1,827.00 74.97 1202-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 2,113.00 176.00 1,584.00 0.00 529.00 74.96 1202-4396 Insurance User Charges 65,184.00 5,432.00 48,888.00 0.00 16,296.00 75.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 90,926.00 9,980.17 67,177.76 550.00 23,198.24 74.49 1202-4900 Depreciation
Total Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1202-5400 Equipment/Furniture
Total Equipment/Furniture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Finance Administration 1,449,021.00 107,914.20 998,777.27 26,363.07 423,880.66 70.75 Page: 7

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1203 Human Resources
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1203-4100 Salaries and Benefits
1203-4102 Regular Salaries 266,503.00 9,942.72 164,008.60 0.00 102,494.40 61.54 1203-4106 Regular Overtime 161.00 0.00 160.60 0.00 0.40 99.75 1203-4111 Accrual Cash In 9,609.00 0.00 9,609.05 0.00 -0.05 100.00 1203-4112 Part Time Temporary 18,655.00 1,266.90 2,558.40 0.00 16,096.60 13.71 1203-4180 Retirement 17,530.00 864.99 12,050.30 0.00 5,479.70 68.74 1203-4188 Employee Benefits 280,428.00 21,669.18 201,416.99 2,772.92 76,238.09 72.81 1203-4189 Medicare Benefits 3,733.00 164.23 2,673.94 0.00 1,059.06 71.63 1203-4191 Instant Bonuses 8,871.00 608.82 6,392.61 0.00 2,478.39 72.06 1203-4192 Signing Bonus 230,000.00 7,000.00 179,333.00 0.00 50,667.00 77.97 Total Salaries and Benefits 835,490.00 41,516.84 578,203.49 2,772.92 254,513.59 69.54 1203-4200 Contract Services
1203-4201 Contract Serv/Private 337,298.00 23,259.96 176,755.38 125,613.32 34,929.30 89.64 1203-4251 Contract Service/Govt 6,000.00 96.00 1,398.00 0.00 4,602.00 23.30 Total Contract Services 343,298.00 23,355.96 178,153.38 125,613.32 39,531.30 88.48 1203-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1203-4304 Telephone 1,800.00 119.30 805.72 0.00 994.28 44.76 1203-4305 Office Oper Supplies 4,500.00 381.80 3,979.41 0.00 520.59 88.43 1203-4315 Membership 4,025.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,025.00 0.00 1203-4317 Conference/Training 8,000.00 889.25 8,994.35 159.00 -1,153.35 114.42 1203-4320 Medical Exams 26,000.00 654.00 13,437.62 3,960.00 8,602.38 66.91 1203-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 3,992.00 333.00 2,997.00 0.00 995.00 75.08 1203-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 612.00 51.00 459.00 0.00 153.00 75.00 1203-4396 Insurance User Charges 30,618.00 2,552.00 22,968.00 0.00 7,650.00 75.01 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 79,547.00 4,980.35 53,641.10 4,119.00 21,786.90 72.61 Total Human Resources 1,258,335.00 69,853.15 809,997.97 132,505.24 315,831.79 74.90 Page: 8

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1204 Finance Cashier
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1204-4100 Salaries and Benefits
1204-4102 Regular Salaries 551,906.00 46,843.91 415,093.92 0.00 136,812.08 75.21 1204-4106 Regular Overtime 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 1204-4111 Accrual Cash In 10,343.00 0.00 10,343.24 0.00 -0.24 100.00 1204-4180 Retirement 62,175.00 5,520.14 48,666.22 0.00 13,508.78 78.27 1204-4188 Employee Benefits 138,059.00 12,395.74 103,767.44 0.00 34,291.56 75.16 1204-4189 Medicare Benefits 8,363.00 697.91 6,331.70 0.00 2,031.30 75.71 Total Salaries and Benefits 771,346.00 65,457.70 584,202.52 0.00 187,143.48 75.74 1204-4200 Contract Services
1204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 185,337.00 5,541.09 111,531.75 728.00 73,077.25 60.57 1204-4251 Contract Services/Gov't 250.00 0.00 43.20 0.00 206.80 17.28 Total Contract Services 185,587.00 5,541.09 111,574.95 728.00 73,284.05 60.51 1204-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1204-4304 Telephone 5,200.00 326.38 2,422.41 0.00 2,777.59 46.58 1204-4305 Office Operating Supplies 39,489.00 3,389.35 28,112.93 3,233.34 8,142.73 79.38 1204-4315 Membership 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00
1204-4317 Conference/Training 5,200.00 2,447.00 10,332.82 0.00 -5,132.82 198.71 1204-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 13,115.00 1,093.00 9,837.00 0.00 3,278.00 75.01 1204-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 1,828.00 152.00 1,368.00 0.00 460.00 74.84 1204-4396 Insurance User Charges 42,110.00 3,509.00 31,581.00 0.00 10,529.00 75.00 Total Materials/Supplies/Other 107,342.00 10,916.73 83,654.16 3,233.34 20,454.50 80.94 Total Finance Cashier 1,064,275.00 81,915.52 779,431.63 3,961.34 280,882.03 73.61 Page: 9

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1208 General Appropriations
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1208-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1208-4304 Telephone 150.00 8.17 53.81 0.00 96.19 35.87
1208-4305 Office Oper Supplies 10,000.00 -252.13 4,660.58 0.00 5,339.42 46.61 1208-4390 Communications Equipment Chrgs 3,233.00 269.00 2,421.00 0.00 812.00 74.88 Total General Appropriations 13,383.00 25.04 7,135.39 0.00 6,247.61 53.32 Page: 10

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1214 Prospective Expenditures
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1214-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1214-4322 Unclassified 225,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225,000.00 0.00 Total Prospective Expenditures 225,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225,000.00 0.00 Page: 11

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
12 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1227 Resident & Business Hazard Mitigation Ed
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1227-4200 Contract Services
Total Resident & Business Hazard Mitigation Ed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 12

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
13 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
1299 Interfund Transfers Out
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
1299-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
1299-4399 OperatingTransfers Out 2,236,368.00 218,372.97 1,924,724.05 0.00 311,643.95 86.06 Total Interfund Transfers Out 2,236,368.00 218,372.97 1,924,724.05 0.00 311,643.95 86.06 Page: 13

05/18/2026

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
14 10:26AM
expstat.rpt Expenditure Status Report Page:
3/1/2026 through 3/31/2026
Periods: 9 through 9
001 General Fund
2101 Police
Prct
Balance Used
Year-to-date
Encumbrances
Year-to-date
Expenditures Expenditures
Adjusted
Account Number Appropriation
2101-4100 Salaries and Benefits
2101-4102 Regular Salaries 7,356,716.00 638,713.08 5,646,086.99 0.00 1,710,629.01 76.75 2101-4105 Special Duty Pay 115,090.00 9,816.92 84,207.19 0.00 30,882.81 73.17 2101-4106 Regular Overtime 1,123,639.00 34,276.36 950,838.49 0.00 172,800.51 84.62 2101-4111 Accrual Cash In 680,206.00 67,118.08 424,429.70 0.00 255,776.30 62.40 2101-4112 Part Time Temporary 4,654.00 0.00 1,531.91 0.00 3,122.09 32.92 2101-4117 Shift Differential 12,813.00 893.75 8,977.01 0.00 3,835.99 70.06 2101-4118 Training Officer 50,063.00 3,368.96 39,591.04 0.00 10,471.96 79.08 2101-4180 Retirement 4,339,914.00 347,835.28 3,088,471.26 0.00 1,251,442.74 71.16 2101-4184 IRC 415(B) Retirement 2,517.00 0.00 1,517.40 0.00 999.60 60.29 2101-4185 Alternative Retirement System-Parttime 0.00 15.19 99.59 44.41 -144.00 0.00 2101-4187 Uniform Allowance 43,295.00 3,625.21 32,253.54 0.00 11,041.46 74.50 2101-4188 Employee Benefits 966,972.00 84,489.02 714,922.54 0.00 252,049.46 73.93 2101-4189 Medicare Benefits 137,579.00 11,160.18 104,932.63 0.00 32,646.37 76.27 Total Salaries and Benefits 14,833,458.00 1,201,312.03 11,097,859.29 44.41 3,735,554.30 74.82 2101-4200 Contract Services
2101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 374,695.00 49,673.78 221,736.57 14,317.77 138,640.66 63.00 2101-4251 Contract Service/Govt 929,269.00 207,700.00 929,455.00 0.00 -186.00 100.02 Total Contract Services 1,303,964.00 257,373.78 1,151,191.57 14,317.77 138,454.66 89.38 2101-4300 Materials/Supplies/Other
2101-4304 Telephone 57,540.00 5,735.52 45,260.91 100.00 12,179.09 78.83 2101-4305 Office Oper Supplies 73,000.00 2,728.95 40,391.73 3,586.41 29,021.86 60.24 2101-4306 Prisoner Maintenance 26,080.00 2,345.53 14,586.93 215.99 11,277.08 56.76 2101-4307 Radio Maintenance 4,248.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,248.00 0.00 2101-4309 Maintenance Materials 8,500.00 163.73 1,439.25 242.63 6,818.12 19.79 2101-4312 Travel Expense , POST 27,799.00 150.00 2,738.88 0.00 25,060.12 9.85 2101-4313 Travel Expense, STC 6,615.00 489.15 4,475.23 100.00 2,039.77 69.16 2101-4314 Uniforms 45,000.00 1,559.29 23,795.22 2,257.68 18,947.10 57.90 2101-4315 Membership 8,160.00 199.00 4,543.00 0.00 3,617.00 55.67 Page: 14