Agenda packet — Hollister City Council, February 21, 2023 (part 3 of 5)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Buena Vista Road was evaluated in this study to determine if traffic calming measures are needed, and if needed, what measures should be implemented.

To determine the need and potential feasible improvements, Kimley-Horn and the City of Hollister collected existing conditions and historical data including traffic counts, speed surveys, and collision history. In addition, Kimley-Horn and the City conducted two virtual community meetings and an online survey to poll the community’s concerns and wants.

Virtual meeting attendees provided feedback that was used to guide the traffic calming study and develop the proposed traffic calming plan. In addition, the online survey was used, in addition to the virtual public workshops, to poll the community’s opinion on the proposed traffic calming measures.

The culmination of the site visit, existing conditions data collection, and community feedback is that there is a traffic problem along Buena Vista Road consisting of the following:
• Vehicle speeding
• Collisions
• Lack of safe pedestrian crossings
FHWA’s traffic calming toolbox was evaluated to determine cost effective measures that could be implemented along Buena Vista Road to create a safer atmosphere for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists.

Potential traffic calming measures were presented to the local community and meeting attendees provided feedback that guided traffic calming recommendations.

The results of the efforts described above is summarized in the table below and graphically shown in Figure 6 through Figure 17 in the recommendations chapter of this report. The final traffic calming plan resulted in a majority of positive feedback from the community as shown in the online survey results.

The selection of traffic calming measures was based on the effectiveness of the features and also input from the community.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 336
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 4 ends

Location Improvement
Beresini Lane
Figure 6
1 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 2 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Beresini Lane to
Aguirre Drive
Figure 7
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Aguirre Drive to
Carnoble Drive
Figure 8
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Carnoble Drive to
Brandy Court
Figure 9
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg 4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
Brandy Court to
Miller Road
Figure 10
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along north & south leg 4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
5 (Interim Improvement) Install raised speed table at Gonzales Drive intersection
6 (Ultimate Improvement) Install mini-roundabout at Gonzales Drive intersection
Miller Road to
Marille Lane
Figure 11
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Marielle Lane to
Westside
Boulevard
Figure 12
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Westside
Boulevard to Line
Street
Figure 13
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along north and south leg
4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
5 Install raised median and rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) system at Line Street intersection
6 (Interim Improvement) Install all-way stop control at Westside Boulevard intersection
7 (Ultimate Improvement) Install mini-roundabout at Westside Boulevard intersection
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 337
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 5 ends

Location Improvement
Line Street to
Locust Avenue
Figure 14
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg 4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
Locust Avenue to
Fern Street
Figure 15
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south and west leg of Locust Avenue and north leg of Fern Street
4 Install rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) system at Fern Street intersection and augment with advance warning signs 5 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
6 Install delineators or raised wheel stops within striped bike buffer Fern Street to
Monterey Street
Figure 16
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install delineators or raised wheel stops within striped bike buffer Monterey Street to
San Benito Street
Figure 17
1 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 2 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg of Monterey Street and all legs of Thompson/Raven Street
3 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
4 Restrict on -street parking due to limited sight distance and proximity to railroad crossing along Buena Vista Road

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 338
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 6 ends

1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the existing conditions, public outreach, and traffic calming recommendations pertaining to the study roadway of Buena Vista Road. Buena Vista Road is a local two-lane road located in the northeast quadrant of the City of Hollister, California.

This report is organized as follows:

Chapter 1 describes the study roadway’s existing conditions and provides a qualitative description of Bue na Vista Road and summarizes existing data collected along the roadway include traffic counts and speed surveys.

Chapter 2 provides a detailed primer for potential traffic calming treatments as recommended by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

Chapter 3 describes the virtual public meetings held for the Buena Vista Road community, as well as results ascertained from an online survey distributed to the community.

Chapter 4 summarizes this study’s findings and provides recommendations and concept layouts showing feasible traffic calming measures that could be implemented along the study roadway.

Buena Vista Road Description
Buena Vista Road is an existing east-west two -lane collector roadway , is approximately 1 ¾ miles long between the western city limits and San Benito Street and has an asphalt paved roadway width that var ies between approximately 26 and 60 feet (curb to curb). The City recently extended Buena Vista Road with the North Street improvement project between Locust Avenue and San Benito Road. The study roadway includes one lane in each direction of travel, class II bike lanes, and on-street parking on the south side of the street. Buena Visa Road provides access to single family dwellings, Tony Aguirre Memorial Park , John Z. Hernandez Memorial Park, Calaveras Park , and Calaveras Elementary School.

Buena Vista Road is identified as a key roadway corridor for future improvement from the 2020 City of Hollister Complete Street Plan. The goal of the plan is to provide near-term and long-term complete street improvements for all users including pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and automobiles.

San Benito County Express Blue Line and Green Line bus stops are located along Buena Vista Road near the following intersections:

Table 1 – San Benito County Express Bus Stops
Location Line
Buena Vista Road & Graf Road Blue Line & Green
Line Buena Vista Road & Miller Road
Buena Vista Road & Felice (Calaveras Elementary School)

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 339
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 7 ends

Numerous residential driveways and local streets intersect Buena Vista Road. The following intersections along Buena Vista Road are either all-way stop-controlled or minor street stop- controlled.

Table 2 – Existing Intersection Control Along Buena Vista Road Location Intersection Control
Buena Vista Road & Beresini Lane Beresini Ln Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Aguirre Drive Aguirre Dr Stop Only Buena Vista Road & Ranchito Drive Ranchito Dr Stop Only Buena Vista Road & Willow Dr ive Willow Dr Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Carnoble Drive Carnoble Dr Stop Only Buena Vista Road & Vista View Lane Vista View Ln Stop Only Buena Vista Road & Brandy Court Brandy Ct Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Gonzalez Drive Gonzalez Dr Stop Only Buena Vista Road & Miller Road Miller Rd Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Marille Lane Marille Ln Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Westside Boulevard Westside Blvd Stop Only Buena Vista Road & Vista Lane Vista Ln Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Line Street Line St Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Almond Court Almond Ct Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Acacia Court Acacia Ct Stop Only
Buena Vista Road & Locust Avenue All Way Stop
Buena Vista Road / North Street & Fern Street Fern St Stop Only Buena Vista Road / North Street & Monterey Street Monterey St Stop Only Buena Vista Road / North Street & Thompson Street Thompson St Stop Only

Sidewalk and on-street parking exist along the extent of Buena Vista Road and the posted speed limit is 30 mph. Next to the Calaveras Elementary School, the posted speed limit is 25 mph when children are present. The project study area is shown in Figure 1.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 340
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 8 ends

Figure 1 – Project Study Area

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 341
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 9 ends

Existing and Cumulative Traffic Data
Average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along Buena Vista Road was determined from traffic data analyzed for the Mirabella II Subdivision project dated February 2015 for the existing and cumulative condition scenarios. The ADT for each roadway segment was compared with the acceptable daily thresholds identified in the City of Hollister General Plan and were determined by multiplying the PM peak hour volumes by 10 (typically PM peak hour traffic volumes represent 10 percent of the daily traffic).

Traffic volumes for Existing conditions is summarized in Figure 2 while traffic volumes for Cumulative conditions is summarized in Figure 3.

Figure 2 – Existing ADT Volumes

Figure 3 – Cumulative ADT Volumes

As indicated in Figure 2 and Figure 3, the ADT along Buena Vista Road is anticipated to increase substantially between Existing and Cumulative conditions due to the addition of new residential developments on the north side of Buena Vista and completion of the North Street Extension Project to San Benito Street. It should be noted that the roadway segments are under the 10,000 daily vehicle threshold and can accommodate the additional growth in local traffic.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 342
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 10 ends

Existing Speed Data
In addition, the 85th percentile speed was reviewed for the same roadway segments evaluated for the ADT volume. The 85th percentile speed represents the speed at which 85 percent of traffic does not exceed and is commonly used to determine a roadway speed limit. Existing 85th percentile speeds were used from the speed survey reported in the Woodle Pre-Zone and Annexation TIA, dated December 2018.

Figure 4 summarizes the speed limit and 85% percentile speeds, where roadway segments with an 85th percentile speed 10 mph over the speed limit are shaded and bolded. The speed survey showed that 85th percentile speeds were 10 mph over the speed limit along the three Buena Vista Road roadway segments. The Woodle Pre-Zone and Annexation TIA noted that the speed survey showed a reduction in speed, of at least 5 mph, along Buena Vista Road near the vicinity of the Calaveras Elementary School between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 2:00 PM and 3:00 PM.

Figure 4 – Speed Data Summary (2018)

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 343
Kimley >>>Horn
Speed
# Roadway Segment Limit
(mph),
11 Buena Vist a West of Miller Road 30 Ro a d'
2 B1Jena Vist a Between Mill er Roa d a nd 25 Roa d' W est side Boutevard Buern a Vista Ea;sf of Wesl:s i d'e 3 Ro a dl Bou leva rd 30 4 Mi ller Roa d So ulh o f Buena Vii :sta 25
5 Wests tae So uth of Brnma Vista 30 Bo l!J levard
Note: 89!' pei-,ceml l e speed 10 n1;Jh above sp ee d l i mit are bo ld e<l .:md sfl aded _ Swrce: He);i;igoo , .20 '1 8

8.911
Di r ection Percentile
Speed
(mph)
EB 41
WB 43
EB 42
WB «
EB 43
WB 34
NB 25
SB 24
NB 27
SB 24

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 11 ends

Along Buena Vista Road, the 85% percentile speeds exceed the 30 and 25 mph posted speed limit by an average of over 10 mph. Exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or more is significant and indicates that traffic calming measures are recommended to mitigate excessive speeding.

An additional speed survey was conducted in 2021 after completion of the Buena Vista Road / North Street extension between Locust Avenue and San Benito Street. This section of road has sight distance constraints due to the vertical curve over the hill and has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. The 85% percentile speed on Buena Vista Road between Fern Street and Thompson Street is approximately 50 mph which exceeds the posted speed limit by an average of over 10 mph.

Exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or more is significant and indicates that traffic calming measures are recommended to mitigate excessive speeding. A summary of the speed survey conducted at the Buena Vista Road / North Street extension is shown in the Appendix.

Figure 5 – Speed Data East of Fern Street (2021)

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 344
Kimley >>>Horn
Buena Vista Speed Survey Count East of Fern Street {8/11/2021) 1400
1200
1000
~ ::, 800
0 > ;;
0 ::,:
~ 595
] 600
0 ....
400
200
117
80 11 28
0 1-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35
U56
1183
1071
36--40 41-45 46-50
Vehicle Speed (MPH)
710
5 1 -55
>lOMPH
Over Speed
Lim it
84%
155
56-60
20 61-65
< Speed
Lim it
2%
Posted
Speed
5 66-70 71-75
<5MPH
Over Speed
Lim it
2%
5·10 MPH
Over Speed
Li mit
u,:,
4 +76

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 12 ends

2. TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX
Traffic Calming improvement options are considered in this study in order to improve conditions along Buena Vista Road for all road users. The following sections describe the goals and objectives of implementing traffic calming measures, as well as a toolbox of potential treatments considered in this study.

What is Traffic Calming?
Traffic Calming is defined as the combination of mainly physical measures that have the ability to reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for non-motorized street users (Lockwood, Ian. ITE Traffic Calming Definition. ITE Journal, July 1997, pg. 22). From ITE, the following describes traffic calming goals:
• increase the quality of life;
• incorporate the preferences and requirements of the people using the area (e.g., working, playing, residing) along the street(s), or at intersection(s); • creat e safe and attractive streets;
• help to reduce the negative effects of motor vehicles on the environment (e.g., pollution, sprawl); and
• promote pedestrian, cycle and transit use.

Furthermore, traffic calming objectives described by ITE include:
• achieving slow speeds for motor vehicles,
• reducing collision frequency and severity,
• increasing the safety and the perception of safety for non-motorized users of the street(s),
• reducing the need for police enforcement,
• enhancing the street environment (e.g., street scaping), • encouraging water infiltration into the ground,
• increasing access for all modes of transportation, and • reducing cut-through motor vehicle traffic.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 345
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 13 ends

The Toolbox
Things to consider when selecting traffic calming devices:
• Appropriateness (volume and speed limit)
• Effectiveness
• Bicycle and Pedestrian Activity
• Vehicle Parking
• Emergency vehicle and transit access
• Construction Cost and Feasibility (Low less than $10k, Medium $10k-20k, High more than $20k)
• Community Impact
• Noise
Table 3 – Strategies Considered
Strategies
In Toolbox
Lateral Shifts/Chicanes Realigned Intersections
Curb Extensions
• Midblock curb extensions
• Choker
• Bulb -outs
Speed Cushions, Humps, and Tables
Diagonal Diverter Pavement Treatment
Partial/Full Closure Mini-Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles
Median Barrier/Forced Turn Island Raised Intersections/Crosswalks Speed Limit Signs
• Speed limit signs
• Radar feedback speed limit signs
Median Island
Traffic Calming, but not in Toolbox
Speed Monitoring Trailer/Enforcement Road Diets
Roundabouts Striping narrow lanes and/or centerlines
On-street Parking
Not Traffic Calming, not in Toolbox
Stop Sign Traffic Signals

A detailed toolbox description of each traffic calming measure is included in the Appendix.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 346
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 14 ends

3. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND FEEDBACK
Two virtual public meetings were hosted by the City of Hollister and Kimley-Horn between March and July 2021 in order to share information and gather feedback from the local community.

Meeting materials were presented in both English and Spanish.

Public meeting dates were March 24, 2021 and July 14, 2021, which were advertised via standard City procedures. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the public meetings were held online via Zoom video conference and between 10 and 30 members of the community attended each meeting.

The objective of the meetings was to present draft traffic calming recommendations to the community and gather community feedback on the draft plan (Meeting #1) and present the final traffic calming plan to the community (M eeting #2).

An online survey (SurveyMonkey) was prepared and distributed to the community in order to poll their opinions on the draft traffic calming plan.

Public meetings and SurveyMonkey results are described in the following sections.

Meeting #1 Summary
Meeting #1 was held on March 24, 2021. Kimley-Horn and the City of Hollister presented draft concept layouts showing potential traffic calming improvements to the community for feedback.

Kimley-Horn and the City developed the draft layouts based on existing conditions data, a field review of the study area, and engineering best practices. High-level improvement options were presented for discussion and are described below. The meeting also had the opportunity for attendees to share their concerns and comment on the draft traffic calming layouts presented. In general, the community’s comments and feedback can be summarized as follows:
• Speeding is an issue along Buena Vista Road
• Sideshows and street racing frequently occurr ing at night cause noise and safety issues • Vulnerable pedestrians and cyclists especially at Calaveras School • Low police presence and traffic enforcement
• On-street parking conflicts
• Cut-through traffic from SR 156 to central Hollister
• Are vertical deflection traffic calming measures (speed humps) allowed in the City? • The community supports traffic calming measures to address speeding • The community wants the traffic calming to consider impacts to on-street parking • The community supports improving visibility and safety for pedestrians and bicycles The complete collection of presentation materials and comments from Meeting #1 are included in the App endix.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 347
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 15 ends

Meeting #2 Summary
Meeting #2 was held on July 14, 2021. Kimley-Horn and the City of Hollister presented refined concept layouts based on community feedback provided in Meeting #1 and additional collaboration between Kimley-Horn and the City.

General refinements to the traffic calming plan presented in Meeting #1 include the following:
• Recommend raised speed humps / speed cushions as a feasible traffic calming measure along Buena Vista Road
• Install high visibility triple-4 crosswalks where crosswalks are recommended. • Install buffered bike lanes where appropriate along Buena Vista Road • Install enhanced pedestrian crossings and rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) system at Line St intersection
• Added City striping plans from Locust Avenue to San Felipe Road • Identified appropriate on-street parking along Buena Vista Road • Recommend Interim traffic calming option to install speed cushions • Recommend Ultimate traffic calming option to install mini -roundabouts at Gonzales Drive and Westside Boulevard pending future development and funding Presentation materials and notes from Meeting #2 are included in the Appendix. Improvement recommendations are described in detail in the recommendations chapter of this report and concept layouts are included in Figure 6 through Figure 17.

Online Survey
Kimley-Horn and the City produced electronic surveys for distribution to the community. The surveys were created using the SurveyMonkey web application and distributed to the community via the City’s website and mailed flyers with a QR code link. The purpose to distributing the surveys to the community was to solicit feedback on the traffic calming plan presented at Meeting #1 and Meeting #2.

The online surveys consisted of Yes/No questions as well as accompanying concept layouts. The questions and community feedback for Survey #1 is summariz ed in Table 4 while the questions and community feedback for Survey #2 is summarized in Table 5.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 348
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 16 ends

Table 4 – Survey #1 Results
Survey Question Yes No
Q1. Do you like the Traffic Circle at Gonzales Drive? 65% 35% Q2. Do you like the improvements at Beresini Lane? 72% 28% Q3. Do you like the bike lane on Buena Vista Road?
(Ranchito Dr to Carnoble Dr) 79% 21%
Q4. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road?
(Westside Blvd to Almond Ct) 82% 18%
Q5. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road?
(Locust St to Monterey St) 89% 11%
Q6. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road?
(Monterey St to San Benito St) 77% 23%
Notes:

Total survey responses = 32
Survey responses collected from 2/23/2021 to 3/30/2021

Table 5 – Survey #2 Results
Survey Question Yes No
Q1. Do you like the Roundabout at Gonzales Drive? 90% 10% Q2. Do you like the Roundabout at Westside Boulevard? 67% 33% Q3. Do you like the improvements at Beresini Lane? 75% 25% Q4. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road?
(Ranchito Dr to Carnoble Dr) 71% 29%
Q5. Do you like the improvements at Line Street? 80% 20% Q6. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road ?
(Westside Blvd to Almond Ct) 75% 25%
Q7. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road?
(Locust St to Monterey St) 88% 12%
Q8. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road?
(Monterey St to San Benito St) 71% 29%
Notes:

Total survey responses = 11
Survey responses collected from 6/10/2021 to 7/31/2021

As shown in the tables above, the community voted in favor of each traffic calming improvement presented in the online surveys.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 349
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 17 ends

4. RECOMMENDATIONS
Buena Vista Road was evaluated in this study to determine if traffic calming measures are needed, and if needed, what measures should be implemented.

Potential traffic calming measures were presented to the local community and meeting attendees provided feedback that guided traffic calming recommendations.

The end product of the efforts described above is summarized in Table 6 below and graphically shown in Figure 6 through Figure 17. The final traffic calming plan resulted in a majority of positive feedback from the community as shown in the online survey results.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 350
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 18 ends

Table 6 – Recommended Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming Improvements Location Improvement
Beresini Lane
Figure 6
1 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 2 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Beresini Lane to
Aguirre Drive
Figure 7
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Aguirre Drive to
Carnoble Drive
Figure 8
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Carnoble Drive to
Brandy Court
Figure 9
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg 4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
Brandy Court to
Miller Road
Figure 10
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along north & south leg 4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
5 (Interim Improvement) Install raised speed table at Gonzales Drive intersection
6 (Ultimate Improvement) Install mini -roundabout at Gonzales Drive intersection
Miller Road to
Marille Lane
Figure 11
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Marielle Lane to
Westside
Boulevard
Figure 12
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg Westside
Boulevard to Line
Street
Figure 13
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along north and south leg
4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
5 Install raised median and rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) system at Line Street intersection
6 (Interim Improvement) Install all-way stop control at Westside Boulevard intersection
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 351
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 19 ends

Table 6 – Recommended Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming Improvements Location Improvement
7 (Ultimate Improvement) Install mini -roundabout at Westside Boulevard intersection
Line Street to
Locust Avenue
Figure 14
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg 4 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
Locust Avenue to
Fern Street
Figure 15
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south and west leg of Locust Avenue and north leg of Fern Street
4 Install rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) system at Fern Street intersection and augment with advance warning signs 5 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
6 Install delineators or raised wheel stops within striped bike buffer Fern Street to
Monterey Street
Figure 16
1 Install raised speed cushions with 250’ to 500’ spacing 2 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 3 Install delineators or raised wheel stops within striped bike buffer Monterey Street to
San Benito Street
Figure 17
1 Install Class II buffered bike lane in EB & WB direction 2 Install new high visibility triple-4 crosswalk along south leg of Monterey Street and all legs of Thompson/Raven Street
3 Install center turn lane and lane transition striping along Buena Vista Road
4 Restrict on -street parking due to limited sight distance and proximity to railroad crossing along Buena Vista Road
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 352
Kimley >>>Horn

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 20 ends

Figure 6 – Beresini Lane

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 353
Kimley >>>Horn

LANE TRANSITION AT
35 MPH DESIGN SPEED
OUJ
3I~==============~~====~~======~~~=~:_=z==~=-===~===~===~===~====~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~dUJ ~ BUENA VISTA RD ~ z ~ ~~~-~:~::~::~~:::~~~~~::~::~~~:~)~
PL
VARIES 15'

GRAVEL SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE
& DR IVEWAY WESlBOUND
Ct
45'
12'

TRAVEL LANE
EASlBOUND
6' 12' 5'

CLASS II PARKING DRIVE

BIKE WAY
LANE &:

TREES

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
Kimley >>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197 008 191 AUGUS T 2021
PL
5'
SIDE
WALK
L____J
PL
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DRIVEWAY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.
11111111111
11111111111
--------::---------------~
6' 2'
CLASS 0: w
II BIKE i...
i...

LANE ::::,
CD
w
Q.
~
Cll
11'
z
....J
z
(/)
UJ
0:::

UJ co

TRAVEL LANE

WESTBOUND
irF
~
45'
11'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
2'
0: w
i...
i... ::::,
CD
w
Q.
~
Cll
6'
CLASS

II BIKE
LANE

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(BERESINI LN TO BRANDY CT)
~
PL
7' 5 ' 5'
PARKING DRIVE SIDE WAY WALK c!c
TREES
L____J
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 2

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 21 ends

Figure 7 – Beresini Lane to Aguirre Drive

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 354
Kimley >>>Horn
3" RAISED SPEED CUSHION WITH

WHEEL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY
-VEHICLES

I I I I
Kimley >>> Horn
MF-197 008 191 AUGUS T 202 1
I

MAINTAIN EXISTING
ON-S"TREET PARKING

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
I
0 25 50 100
~
PL
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DRIVEWAY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.
3" RAISED SPEED CUSHION WITH

WHEEL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY

VEHICLES
6' 2' 11'
CLASS 0::: "TRAVEL LANE w
II BIKE LL. WESTBOUND LL.

LANE :::,
ID
w a..
~
\
<t.
45'
11'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
I
\3• SPEED CUSHIOJ
2' 6'
0::: CLASS w
LL. II BIKE LL. :::, LANE ID
w a..
~

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(BERESINI LN TO BRANDY CT)
PL
7' 5' 5'

PARKING DRIVE SIDE WAY WALK
&
"TREES
L____J
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 3

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 22 ends

Figure 8 – Aguirre Drive to Carnoble Drive

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 355
Kimley >>>Horn
PL
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DR IVEWAY
a:::
0 0 t:

I u z
>> Horn ~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 4 MF-197008 191 AUGUS T 202 1 CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 23 ends

Figure 9 – Carnoble Drive to Brandy Court

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 356
Kimley >>>Horn
11111111
z
...J
s
UJ >

PL Ct
45'
VARIES 15' 12'

GRAVEL SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE
& DR IVEWAY WESlBOUND EASlBOUND
6'
3" RAISED SPEED CUSHION WITH

WHEEL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY

VEHICLES
12' 5'
PL
5'

CLASS II PARKING DRIVE SIDE

BIKE WAY WALK
LANE &:

TREES
L____J

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
Kimley >>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 191 AUGUST 202 1
PL

LANE TRANSITION AT
35 MPH DESIGN SPEED
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DRIVEWAY
6' 2' 11'
CLASS 0: TRAVEL LANE w
II BIKE i... WESTBOUND i...

LANE ::::,
CD
w
Q.
~
Vl
~
45'
11' 2' 6'
TRAVEL LANE 0: CLASS w
EASTBOUND i... II BIKE i... ::::, LANE CD
w
Q.
~
Vl

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(BERESINI LN TO BRANDY CT)

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

I-
(.)
>-0 z
<(
0::: en
PL
7' 5' 5'
PARKING DRIVE SIDE WAY WALK c!c
TREES
I
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 5

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 24 ends

Figure 10 – Brandy Court to Miller Road

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 357
Kimley >>>Horn
0 >-0 z
Ill
w
Q.
~
(/)

LANE TRANSITION AT
35 MPH DESIGN SPEED
61'
11' 9'

TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN

WESTBOUND CENTER

TURN LANE
~
11'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
I!
111111111
111111111
111111111111
111111111
2·
a:: w
I= => Ill
w
Q.
~
(/)
!lf
0 0:::
0::: w
...J
...J
2 6'
CLASS

II BIKE
LANE
-------■w
=======■Z
...J
~~==-~-=--■I u =;;::3-=======II I-=----'-------- >> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 191 AUGUS T 2021

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

ULTIMATE ROUNDABOUT CONTROL AT GONZALES
PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 6

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 25 ends

Figure 11 – Brandy Court to Marille Lane

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 358
Kimley >>>Horn
PL
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DR IVEWAY
15'

TRAVEL LANE
WESlBOUND
Ct
45'
12'

TRAVEL LANE
EASlBOUND
6' 12' 5'

CLASS II PARKING DRIVE

BIKE WAY
LANE &:

TREES

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
Kimley >>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 191 AUGUS T 202 1
PL
5'
SIDE
WALK
L____J
PL

SPEED CUSHION WI

EL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY
CLES
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DRIVEWAY
6'
CLASS

II BIKE
LANE
111111111
1111111
ffilPLE FOUR/ Ill

CROSSWALK
2' 11' 11'
0: TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE w
i... WESTBOUND EASTBOUND i... ::::,
CD
w
Q.
~
Ill
2' 6'
0: CLASS w
i... II BIKE i... ::::, LANE CD
w
Q.
~
Ill

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(MILLER RD TO VISTA LN)

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

PL
7' 5 ' 5'
PARKING DRIVE SIDE WAY WALK c!c
TREES
L____J
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 7

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 26 ends

Figure 12 – Marille Lane to Westside Boulevard

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 359
Kimley >>>Horn
w z
::i
I
(.)
f-I I >> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197 008 191 AUGUS T 202 1
PL
5'
SIDE
WALK
L____J
PL
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DRIVEWAY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.
6' 2' 11' 11' 2' 6'
CLASS 0: TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE 0: CLASS w w
II BIKE i... WESTBOUND EASTBOUND i... II BIKE i... i...

LANE ::::, ::::, LANE CD CD
w w a. a.
~ ~
Ill Ill

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(MILLER RD TO VISTA LN)
PL
7' 5' 5'
PARKING DRIVE SIDE WAY WALK c!c
TREES
L____J
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 8

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 27 ends

Figure 13 – Westside Boulevard to Line Street

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 360
Kimley >>>Horn
PL

CONFORM TO

PROPOSED

BUENA VISTA

CROSS-SECTION
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DRIVEWAY
\ \
15'

TRAVEL LANE

WESTBOUND
INTERIM IMPROVEMENT: ALL WAY STOP AT INTERSECTION
ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT: ROUNDABOUT AT INTERSECTION
PROPOSED 80' ICD MINI ROUNDABOUT.
(SEE ALTERNATIVE STOP CONTROL

INTERSECTION LAYOUT)

CONFORM TO PROPOSED

BUENA VISTA CROSS-SECTION
i
45'
12'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
6'

CLASS II
BIKE
LANE
12' 5'

PARKING DRIVE
WAY
&:

TREES
PL
5'
SIDE
WALK
L____J
PL

BUENA VISTA RD
z
....J
;::
(/)
>
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOULDER
& DRIVEWAY
6' 2' 11'
CLASS a: TRAVEL LANE w
II BIKE i... WESllBOUND i...

LANE ::::,
CD
w
Q.
~
Cll

PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN

AND RECTANGULAR RAPID

FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB)

TO IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN

VISIBILITY AT CROSSINGS
1,. 2' 6' 7'
TRAVEL LANE a: CLASS PARKING w
EASTBOUND i... II BIKE i... ::::, LANE CD
w
Q.
~
Cll
5' 5'
DRIVE SIDE WAY WALK c!c
TREES
I

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION (VISTA LN TO LOCUST AVE)
Kimley >>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 191 AUG US T 202 1

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

ULTIMATE ROUNDABOUT CONTROL AT WESTSIDE
PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 9

CITY OF HOLLISTER -BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 28 ends

Figure 14 – Line Street to Locust Avenue

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 361
Kimley >>>Horn
PL
61'
5' VARIES 11'-19' 15' 12·

SIDE PARKING TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE

WALK WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
~
6'

CLASS II
BIKE
LANE
12·
111111111111
11111111111
1-II u
0 z
0 ~
....J
>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 191 AUGUST 202 1
5'
SIDE
WALK
BUENA \YISTA RD
I I
PLPL
5' 7' 6' 2· 11'
SIDE PARKING CLASS a:: TRAVEL LANE
WALK II BIKE ~ WESTBOUND u..

LANE => ID
ILi a..
~
(/)
61'
0~
~ u

LANE ID
ILi a..
~
(/)

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(VISTA LN TO LOCUST AVE)

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.
p
7' 5' 5'

PARKING DRIVE SIDE WAY WALK
&
TREES
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 10

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 29 ends

Figure 15 – Locust Avenue to Fern Street

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 362
Kimley >>>Horn

CONFORM TO BUENA VISTA
ROAD TRACK 339 STRIPING

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
UJ---=-- -z -◄ - -:::i -======~-:

I ::
u ---~ ~::
~ ----------: ------=-.,...___• -•••••••••••
111111.!,_•!!.!
~
10' 29'
TREES
&
SIDE
WALK

TRAVEL LANE

WESTBOUND
(UNMARKED)
ct
58'

PROVIDE CENTER LEFT TURN

LANE ACCESS INTO FERN ST

TO MAINTAIN SIGHT

DISTANCE AT HILL CREST

INSTALL DELINEATORS OR

RAISED WHEEL STOPS WITHIN

STRIPED BUFFER TO CHANNEL

VEHICLE TRAVEL WAY

INSTALL ADVANCED WARNING

SIGNS OF PEDESTRIAN

CROSSWALK AT FERN STREET ---------
29' 10' 5' 5'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
(UNMARKED)
TREES
&
SIDE
WALK

SIDE TREES
WALK
~L----------_J~
z a::: f-
UJ Cl)
LL
11!
1111111111111 ............... -------
8' VAR 12'

PROPOSED RECTANGULAR

RAPID FLASHING BEACONS
(RRFB) TO IMPROVE

PEDESTRIAN VISIBILITY AT

CROSSING
ct
58'
VARIES 12'
CLASS O::o::

Wo TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE
II BIKE LL..1-WESTBOUND CENTER EASTBOUND
LANE LL. w IIlz
w:J
D..W -Cl
~old
VAR 8' 5' 5'
O::o:: CLASS Wo I:: I-II BIKE :::, >> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 19 1 AUGUST 202 1

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 11

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 30 ends

Figure 16 – Fern Street to Monterey Street

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 363
Kimley >>>Horn
UJ z
....J
I
l)
~
>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 191 AUGUST 202 1
3" RAISED SPEED CUSHION WITH

WHEEL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY

VEHICLES
8 RD/ NORTH ST
UJ z
....J n:::::::=~~~~================::::::::I~
5' 5' 8'

SIDE TREES CLASS

WALK II BIKE
LANE

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

VAR 12'
O::o:: TRAVEL LANE Wo LL..1-WESTBOUND LL. w IIlz
w:J
D..W -Cl
~old
CONFORM TO BUENA ~STA
ROAD TRACK 339 STRIPING

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
~
58'
VARIES 12' VAR
MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE O::o::

Wo
CENTER EASTBOUND I:: I-
TURN LANE :::,<
IDW z
w:J a,_W -a
~old

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(LOCUST AVE TO FERN ST)
8' 5' 5'

CLASS TREES SIDE

II BIKE WAL
LANE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 12

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING
~

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 31 ends

Figure 17 – Monterey Street to San Benito Street

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 364
Kimley >>>Horn
5'
SIDE
WALK

LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE DUE
TO CREST VERllCAL CURVE.

NO ON-STREET PARKING
RECOMMENDED.

BUENA VISTA RD/ NORTH ST
VARIES 24'-27'

TRAVEL LANE

WESTBOUND
-IJ.J
0:::
lJ.J
1-z
0 2
VARIES 4B'-53'
VARIES 24'-27'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND

END BIKE
LANE
5'
SIDE
WALK
~L---------------1~

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
Kimley >>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008 191 AUGUS T 202 1
5' 6' VARIES

SIDE CLASS TRAVEL LANE

WALK II BIKE WESTBOUND
LANE
~
CONFORM TO BUENA ~STA
ROAD TRACK 339 STRIPING

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
~
VARIES 4B' 53' -
VARIES 12'

MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE

CENTER EASTBOUND

TURN LANE
6 '
CLASS

II BIKE
LANE
5'
I-
C/)
0 t:: z
lJ.J co
z
<(
CJ)
SIDE
WALK
~

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(FERN ST TO SAN BENITO ST)

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED TC LAYOUT -SHEET 13

CITY OF HOLLISTER-BUENA VISTA ROAD TRAFFIC CALMING

197008191 Traffic Calming
Buena Vista September 2021

Page 32 ends

APPENDIX
A. TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES

B. EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SPEED DATA

C. PUBLIC WORKSHOP #1 MATERIALS AND COMMUNITY COMMENTS

D. PUBLIC WORKSHOP #1 MATERIALS AND COMMUNITY COMMENTS

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 365
Kimley >>>Horn

A. TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 366
Kimley >>>Horn

Lateral Shifts/Chicanes:

Description
Realignment of an otherwise straight street that causes travel lanes to shift in at least one direction. Chicanes are a series of two or more lateral shifts, which cause motorists to steer back and forth rather than driving in a straight line
This traffic calming devices are also known as deviations, serpentines, reversing curves, or twists.

Applications Recommended Speed: 35 mph or less Recommended Roadway types: Local, collector, or arterial roadways; Most effective with equivalent low volumes on both approaches
Impact to Emergency Vehicles: Low; Can be used on primary emergency access routes, lateral shifts may be used on streets with access to hospitals/ emergency medical services, provided vehicles can straddle the street centerline
Benefits Drawbacks
• Can maintain sufficient width for ease
of emergency vehicles and truck
throughput
• Minimal anticipated volume diversion
from street
• Provides opportunity for landscaping,
wider sidewalks, parklets or other
features
• Can have up to 5% reduction in speed
• Lateral shifts between
• Chicanes may still permit speeding by
drivers cutting straight paths across
the center line • Minimize relocation of
drainage features
• May force bicyclists to share travel
lanes with motor vehicles
• No effect on access, although heavy
trucks may experience challenges
when negotiating
• Street sweeping may need to be done
manually
• May require removal of some on-
street parking
• Bus passengers may experience
discomfort due to quick successive
lateral movements
• Can result in loss of on-street parking

Typical Costs: Medium – High, depending on landscaping and drainage

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 367
Kimley >>>Horn
I

Curb Extensions
Description
Curb extension is a lateral horizontal extension of the sidewalk into the street, resulting in a narrower roadway section
Can be used to varying degrees, curb extensions at an intersections are referred to as a corner extension or a bulb-out If located midblock, it is referred to as a curb extension. One-lane choker forces two-way traffic to take turns going through the pinch point, by adding curb extensions on both sides of the street.

Curb extensions can sometimes be used in combination with raised medians, to provide pedestrian crossing areas. .

Applications Recommended Speed: Any speed limit Recommended Roadway types: Local, collector, or arterial roadways Impact to Emergency Vehicles: Low; when used at corners truck turning radii should be considered.

Benefits Drawbacks
• Can maintain sufficient width for ease of
emergency vehicles and truck throughput
• Minimal anticipated volume diversion from
street
• Provides opportunity for landscaping,
wider sidewalks, parklets or other
features
• Slight reduction in speed
• Can be used to organize on-street
parking
• Can provide shorter pedestrian crossing
distances and increased pedestrian
visibility
• Can provide more pedestrian waiting
areas.
• Can be designed to incorporate bicycle
facilities
• May force bicyclists to share travel
lanes with motor vehicles
• Radaii of Corner extensions needs to
be considered for trucks, buses, and
emergency vehicles
• May require removal of some on-
street parking
• May impact drainage and require re-
location of drainage inlets to prevent
ponding.

Typical Costs:

Low – High, depending on landscaping, drainage, and number of curb extensions added.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 368
Kimley >>>Horn

Partial/ Full Closures
Description
A partial closure is a barrier that blocks travel in one direction, creating a one-way for a short distance on an otherwise two-way street; sometimes called half one-way closures A Full-street closure is when a barrier placed across a street to completely close the street to through traffic, usually leaving open space for pedestrians and bicyclists. Full closures are also known as cul-de-sacs, dead-ends, or mini-parks
Applications Recommended Speed: Any speed limit Recommended Roadway types: Local streets Impact to Emergency Vehicles: High; Closures should not be used on roads/ streets which provide access to hospitals or emergency medical services.

Closure can be designed to allow access with removable, or breakaway delineators or bollards, gates, or mountable
curbs.

Benefits Drawbacks
• Can discourage cut-through traffic
• Can improve pedestrian crossing
safety
• Provides opportunity for
landscaping, wider sidewalks,
parklets or other features
• Can be designed to incorporate
bicycle facilities
• Closures should be used when other
measures have failed to address
speeding and cut through traffic
• May simply shift speeding and traffic
volume to the next street over.
• May have impact to emergency vehicle
access and response time.
• Impact to transit routes
• May divide neighborhoods and
communities
• Increase trip lengths
Typical Costs:

Low – High, depending on simplicity of closure and provision of emergency access.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 369
Kimley >>>Horn

Diagonal Diverters
Description
A diagonal diverter is a barrier placed diagonally across a four-legged intersection to block through movements. Diagonal diverters are also known as a diagonal road closure Applications Recommended Speed: 25 miles per hour or less Recommended Roadway types: Local street intersections Impact to Emergency Vehicles: High; Closures should not be used on roads/ streets which provide access to hospitals or emergency medical services.

Closure can be designed to allow access with removable, or breakaway delineators or bollards, gates, or mountable
curbs.

Benefits Drawbacks
• Can discourage cut-through traffic
• Can improve pedestrian crossing
safety
• Provides opportunity for
landscaping, wider sidewalks,
parklets or other features
• Can be designed to incorporate
bicycle facilities
• Diverter should be used when other
measures have failed to address
speeding and cut through traffic
• May simply shift speeding and traffic
volume to the next street over.
• May have impact to emergency vehicle
access and response time.
• Impact to transit routes
• May divide neighborhoods and
communities
• Increase trip lengths
Typical Costs:

Medium – High, depending on simplicity of closure and provision of emergency access.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 370
Kimley >>>Horn

Median Barrier/Forced Turn Island
Description
Raised islands along the centerline of a street and continuing through an intersection that block the left-turn movement from all intersection approaches and the through movement from the cross street; also called median diverter, intersection barrier, intersection diverter, and island diverter

Raised island that forces a right turn is called a forced turn island Applications Recommended Speed: Any speed limit Recommended Roadway types: Intersection of arterial and collector streets with minor streets.

Impact to Emergency Vehicles: Medium - High; Median barriers inhibit side street access; Barrier can be designed to allow access with removable, or breakaway delineators or bollards, gates, or mountable
curbs.

Benefits Drawbacks
• Can discourage cut-through traffic
• Can be designed to incorporate
bicycle and pedestrian through
traffic
• Barrier should be used when other
measures have failed to address
speeding and cut through traffic
• May simply shift speeding and traffic
volume to the next street over.
• May have impact to emergency vehicle
access and response time.
• May cause on-street parking loss
• May divide neighborhoods and
communities
• Increase trip lengths
Typical Costs:

Low – High, depending on size of barrier and incorporation of emergency vehicle access.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 371
Kimley >>>Horn

Median Island
Description
Raised island located along the street centerline that narrows the travel lanes at that location, median islands can be in conjunction with curb extensions or at crosswalks to provide staged pedestrian crossings
Also called median diverter, intersection barrier, intersection diverter, and island diverter Applications Recommended Speed: 35 miles per hour or less Recommended Roadway types: Local street intersections Impact to Emergency Vehicles: None Benefits Drawbacks
• May have up to 5% reduction in
speed
• Can improve pedestrian crossing
safety
• Provides opportunity for
landscaping, or other features
• Safety can be improved without
substantially increasing delay
• May force bicyclists to share travel
lanes with motor vehicles
• May require removal of some on-street
parking
• May impact drainage and require re-
location of drainage inlets to prevent
ponding.

Typical Costs: Low – High, depending length and width of island.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 372
Kimley >>>Horn
I

Mini -Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles
Description
Mini-roundabouts and traffic circles are center islands placed in unsignalized intersections for traffic to circulate around. The center island can be raised or striped, they can also be designed to be mountable for vehicles with larger turn radii. Drivers to slow to a speed that allows them to comfortably maneuver around them.

Mini-roundabouts are yield control, however traffic circles may also be stop-control. This strategy may not be appropriate for intersections with high left turn volumes of trucks or buses or roadways with more than one travel lane in each direction.

Applications Recommended Speed: 30 miles per hour or less Recommended Roadway types: Local street intersections Impact to Emergency Vehicles: Medium; Traffic circles can be designed to be mountable for emergency vehicles or provide sufficient space for
emergency vehicles to turn in front of the circle
Benefits Drawbacks
• May have up to 5% reduction in
speed
• Provides opportunity for
landscaping, or other features
• Can be designed to incorporate
bicycle facilities
• Diverter should be used when other
measures have failed to address
speeding and cut through traffic
• May simply shift speeding and traffic
volume to the next street over.
• May have impact to emergency vehicle
access and response time.
• Impact to transit routes
• May divide neighborhoods and
communities
• Increase trip lengths
Typical Costs: Medium – High

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 373
Kimley >>>Horn
I

Raised Intersections/ Crosswalks
Description
Flat raised areas covering entire intersections or crosswalk areas, with ramps on all approaches and often with brick or other textured materials on the flat section and ramps Applications Recommended Speed: 30 miles per hour or less Recommended Roadway types: Collector and local streets Impact to Emergency Vehicles: Medium; Does not impact access, but lowers response time.

These treatments should not be used on primary access
routes but are preferred by emergency services over other vertical treatments.

Benefits Drawbacks
• May have up to 5% reduction in
speed
• Provides opportunity for
landscaping, or other features
• Can be designed to incorporate
bicycle facilities
• Diverter should be used when other
measures have failed to address
speeding and cut through traffic
• May simply shift speeding and traffic
volume to the next street over.
• May have impact to emergency vehicle
access and response time.
• Impact to transit routes
• May divide neighborhoods and
communities
• Increase trip lengths
Typical Costs: Low – High, depending on level of enhancements and drainage work.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 374
Kimley >>>Horn
I

Realigned Intersections
Description
Reconfiguration of an intersection with perpendicular angles to have skewed approaches or travel paths through the intersection, known also as a modified intersection Applications Recommended Speed: 25 miles per hour or less Recommended Roadway types: Collector and local streets Impact to Emergency Vehicles: Low Benefits Drawbacks
• May have a speed limit reduction
between 5 – 13 miles per hour
• Provides opportunity for
landscaping, or other features
• Can be designed to incorporate
bicycle facilities
• Designs consider pedestrian crossing
needs such as visibility
• May require drainage redesign.
• Increase trip lengths
Typical Costs: High

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 375
Kimley >>>Horn
I

Speed Cushions/Humps/Tables
Description:

Two or more raised areas placed laterally across a roadway with gaps between raised areas • Height and length similar to a speed hump; spacing of gaps allow emergency vehicles to pass through at higher speeds • Often placed in a series (typically spaced 260 to 500 feet apart) • Sometimes called speed lump, speed slot, and speed pillow Rounded (vertically along travel path) raised areas of pavement typically 12 to 14 feet in length • Often placed in a series (typically spaced 260 to 500 feet apart) • Sometimes called road humps or undulations
• Long, raised speed humps with a flat section in the middle and ramps on the ends; sometimes constructed with brick or other textured materials on the flat section • If placed at a pedestrian crossing, it is referred to as a raised crosswalk • If placed only in one direction on a road, it is called an offset speed table
Applications:

Intersections of collector, local, and residential streets • Typically installed at signalized or all-way stop controlled intersections with high pedestrian crossing demand • Works well with curb extensions and textured crosswalks • Often part of an area-wide traffic calming scheme involving both intersecting streets in densely developed urban areas Appropriate for local and collector streets; mid-block or at intersections, with/without crosswalks • Can be used on a one-lane one-way or two-lane two-way street • Not appropriate for roads with 85th percentile speeds of 45 mph or more • Typically long enough for the entire wheelbase of a passenger car to rest on top or within limits of ramps • Work well in combination with textured crosswalks, curb extensions, and curb radius reductions • Can be applied both with and without sidewalks or dedicated bicycle facilities • Typically installed along closed-section roads (i.e. curb and gutter) but feasible on open section
Design/Installation Issues:

Used at intersections with a maximum speed limit of 35 mph • Typically rise to sidewalk level; appropriate if crosswalks exist on all four legs • Appropriate if a dedicated bicycle facility passes through the intersection • Detectable warnings and/or color contrasts must be incorporated to differentiate the roadway and the sidewalk • May require bollards to define edge of roadway • Storm drainage/underground utility modifications are likely necessary • Minimum pavement slope of 1 percent to facilitate drainage
ITE recommended practice – “Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps” • Most common height is between 3 and 4 inches (reported as high as 6 inches) • Ramps are typically 6 feet long (reported up to 10 feet long) and are either parabolic or linear • Careful design is needed for drainage • Posted speed typically 30 mph or less
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 376
Kimley >>>Horn

Potential Impacts:

Reduction in through movement speeds likely at intersection • Reduction in mid-block speeds typically less than 10 percent • No impact on access • Can make entire intersections more pedestrian-friendly • No data available on volume diversion or safety impacts No impact on non-emergency access • Speeds reductions typically less than for speed humps (typical traversing speeds between 25 and 27 miles per hour) • Speeds typically decline approximately 0.5 to 1 mph midway between tables for each 100 feet beyond the 200-foot approach and exit points of consecutive speed tables • Average traffic volumes diversions of 20 percent when a series of speed tables are implemented • Average crash rate reduction of 45 percent on treated streets • Increase pedestrian visibility and likelihood of driver yield compliance • Generally not appropriate for BRT bus routes
Speed Limit Signs/ Radar Speed Limit Signs
Description A Pole Mounted Speed Display (PMSD) Sign combines the regulatory speed limit sign with a radar speed feedback sign that displays the real -time speed of an approaching vehicle which tends to make motorists reduce their speed. Placement Signs are installed only on streets with a single through-travel lane per travel direction (e.g. a two-lane, two-way or one-lane, one- way street). Generally, one sign is placed at the beginning of the street section identified for traffic calming in each travel direction, in order to reinforce the posted speed limit for vehicles entering the section of street designated for traffic calming. At least 200 feet of visibility distance should be allowed approaching the sign and at least 100 feet between any other signs. Advantages - These signs can potentially be used as a portable assembly that allows for placement at alternating locations.
- Does not physically restrict driver maneuvers and thus will not impose speed reductions on emergency and transit vehicles. - Involves a standard traffic control device easily recognizable by motorists. Disadvantages Installing these signs may be impacted by the availability of a power source. Effectiveness Various sources indicate an average sustained reduction in operating speeds of 5 mph may be achieved. Cost An estimated cost of $7,500 per installation is suggested, depending on whether solar or conventional power is used as well as the proximity of the power source.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 377
Kimley >>>Horn

Traffic Calming Strategies not included in Toolkit:

The following section describes traffic calming strategies not included in the City’s Traffic Calming Toolbox, some of these item
Speed Monitoring Trailer/ Enforcement
Although enforcement of speed limits is a traditional, proven and effective approach to reduce speeding. Enforcement through police presence and speed monitoring is temporary and a strain on law enforcement agencies to continuously enforce speed limits on low volume residential streets and should be used sparingly which is why this is not included in the Toolbox.

Roundabouts
Much like Traffic Signals and stop signs Roundabouts are traffic control devices and should undergo an intersection control evaluation. Roundabouts are appropriate for the intersections of collectors and arterial roadways, for local roadways mini-roundabouts or traffic circles may be more appropriate.

On-Street Parking
On-street parking can have a traffic calming effect in some circumstances, this is because it narrows the road travel lanes and increases the side friction to traffic flow. Changing on-street parking should be done on a case by case basis, considering sight distance, traffic operations, and parking demand.

Road Diets
Road diets should be considered on a case by case basis on roads with more than one travel lane in each direction.

Striping
Road diets should be considered on a case by case basis on roads with more than one travel lane in each direction.

Other Items not included in the Toolkit:

Stop Signs:

Stop signs are traffic control devices intended to control the right-of -way at intersections. The California Manual of Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) has established warrants for the implementation of stop signs. Unwarranted stop signs can actually result in an increase in speeding. Motorists tend to proceed through a stop without stopping in an attempt to make up lost time at stops they perceive as unnecessary. This compromises the safety other motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclist who expect other motorists to stop. Additionally, stop signs can increase noise, greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 378
Kimley >>>Horn

Traffic Signals:

Traffic signals are not included in the traffic calming toolbox. Traffic signals, like stop signs, are traffic control devices intended to control the right-of-way at intersections. The California Manual of Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) has established warrants for the implementation of traffic signals, which generally require higher volume, higher classification roadways and higher vehicle conflicts. the residential feel of a street.

References:
https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/traffic-calming/traffic-calming-measures/ http://www.virginiadot.org/programs/resources/Traffic-Calming-Guide -For -Neighborhood- Streets.pdf
https://www.lovelafayette.org/home/showdocument?id=845

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 379
Kimley >>>Horn

B. EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SPEED DATA

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 380
Kimley >>>Horn

KHA_Buena Vista Speed & Volume.xlsx
Date Time of Day Westbound Eastbound 1-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 66-70 71-75 +76 8/11/2021 12:00 AM 9 15 0001264523100 0
8/11/2021 01:00 AM 3 14 0000043620200 0
8/11/2021 02:00 AM 5 9 1001040142100 0
8/11/2021 03:00 AM 20 11 0000469390000 0
8/11/2021 04:00 AM 55 13 0000 72024 942110 0
8/11/2021 05:00 AM 159 33 10021966602215 4300 0
8/11/2021 06:00 AM 137 72 10042062473824 9211 0
8/11/2021 07:00 AM 155 118 4003287062622614 4 0 0 0
8/11/2021 08:00 AM 129 72 2001235060311515 3 1 0 0
8/11/2021 09:00 AM 117 95 40343346464918 8100 0
8/11/2021 10:00 AM 116 107 40183037504536 5222 1
8/11/2021 11:00 AM 137 144 61033362814348 4000 0
8/11/2021 12:00 PM 162 179 10 0 1 1 17 83 94 91 34 9000 1 8/11/2021 01:00 PM 152 156 60131964789637 4000 0
8/11/2021 02:00 PM 132 160 3004335153716510 0 0 0 2
8/11/2021 03:00 PM 163 238 1 0 12 35 27 64 105 75 82 25 0 0 0 0 8/11/2021 04:00 PM 190 296 4 10 10 15 84 96 132 176 65 33 0 0 0 0 8/11/2021 05:00 PM 180 268 70032369592989 5000 0
8/11/2021 06:00 PM 155 194 900148586811055 0000 0
8/11/2021 07:00 PM 124 191 10 0 0 3 49 46 77 91 38 0001 0 8/11/2021 08:00 PM 87 164 4 0 0 22 50 63 54 82 20 0000 0 8/11/2021 09:00 PM 52 110 300326194814 50000 0
8/11/2021 10:00 PM 41 54 00001416193014 1001 0
8/11/2021 11:00 PM 17 30 00006923432000 0
2497 2743 80 11 28 117 595 1071 1256 1183 710 155 20 5 5 4

47.7% 52.3% 1.5% 0.2% 0.5% 2.2% 11.4% 20.4% 24.0% 22.6% 13.5% 3.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% N/A N/A 1.5% 1.7% 2.3% 4.5% 15.9% 36.3% 60.3% 82.8% 96.4% 99.4% 99.7% 99.8% 99.9% 100.0%Speed Percentile Buena Vista Observed Vehicle Speed (MPH)East of Fern St

42.9 50.8
Traffic Volume
Total Volume
Percentage
50th % Speed
85th % Speed
Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH
> 10 MPH Over Speed Limit
< Speed Limit
< 5 MPH Over Speed Limit
5-10 MPH Over Speed Limit

2.3%

2.2%

11.4%

84.1%
Data_20210811
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 381

KHA_Buena Vista Speed & Volume.xlsx
Chart_20210811
80 11 28
117
595
1071
1256
1183
710
155
20 554
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1‐15 16‐20 21‐25 26‐30 31‐35 36‐40 41‐45 46‐50 51‐55 56‐60 61‐65 66‐70 71‐75 +76 To
t
a
l
24 ‐Ho
u
r
Vo
l
u
m
e
Vehicle Speed (MPH)
Buena Vista Speed Survey Count East of Fern Street (8/11/2021) 10 MPH
Over Speed
Limit
84%
25 MPH
Posted
Speed
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 382
I -I I

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840

MEMORANDUM
To:Abraham Prado
City of Hollister
From:Ben Huie, P.E.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Date: June 11, 2019
Subject: Mirabella II Subdivision Additional Traffic Assessment The Mirabella II Subdivision is a proposed residential development, which includes construction of 170 residential units. In December 2015, Hatch Mott Macdonald prepared a traffic impact analysis (TIA) which identified traffic impacts due to the project and proposed recommended mitigations.

The City of Hollister requested that additional traffic analysis be prepared according to the planning commission resolution number 2018-19 and CEQA traffic mitigation measures. Condition numbers 11iv and 11ii and Mitigation Measures T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4, T-5 and T-6 were included for additional traffic assessment. This memorandum summarizes the additional analysis associated with these recommended condition numbers and mitigation measures.

Improvement at Gonzales Drive and Buena Vista Road
Condition number 11 iv states “The intersection of Gonzales Drive at Buena Vista Road shall be improved with the implementation of a roundabout, or other calming measures as identified by a traffic engineering analysis. The developer shall work with the City Engineering to provide a design.

The improvements shall adhere to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The developer shall pay its fair share of the improvement as determined by the City Engineer based on the approved engineering analysis for the roundabout.”
A roundabout operation analysis was performed at the intersection of Gonzalez Road at Buena Vista Road using SIDRA Intersection 8 software. This intersection is proposed to be one of the primary access points for the project traffic. Existing traffic counts were collected on Thursday, March 14, 2019 during the AM and PM peak hours. These volumes were used along with the project volumes to perform an operational analysis. For both existing and cumulative conditions, the recommended mini-roundabout will operate at Level of Service (LOS) A.

A mini-roundabout preliminary concept was developed per the NCHRP Report 672 Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (Guide) and is included in Attachment A. The recommended mini-roundabout includes a mountable central island and an inscribed circle diameter of 80 feet, which is between the 45- and 90-foot recommendations provided by the Guide. The recommended mini-roundabout conforms to the existing street section, which includes a 14-foot parking lane and a 6-foot Class II bike lane along Buena Vista Road.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 383
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 2 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840 Improvement at Westside Boulevard – Westside Road and Buena Vista Road
The December 2015 TIA identified a project impact at the intersection of Westside Boulevard – Westside Road and Buena Vista Road.

PROPOSED ALL-WAY STOP-CONTROL
Condition number 11 iv states “The intersection of Westside Boulevard – Westside Road and Buena Vista Road intersection shall be improved with an all-way stop control. The eastbound right turn lane on Buena Vista Road shall be striped per Mitigation Measure T-2. The developer shall pay its fair share of the improvement as determined by the City Engineer based on the approved engineering analysis for the all-way stop-control.”
An all-way stop control preliminary concept was developed per the California MUTCD 2014 Edition and is included in Attachment B. The eastbound right turn lane is striped due to the improvement recommendation made in Resolution 2018-2019 TM 2017-3/ Mirabella II/ Ledeboer. Crosswalks and sidewalks were provided at all quadrants of the intersection to improve pedestrian circulation and accessibility near the existing Calaveras Elementary School, located approximately 650 feet to the west of this intersection. The recommended concept conforms to the existing street section, which includes a 14-foot parking lane and a 6-foot Class II bike lane along Buena Vista Road.

PROPOSED MINI-ROUNDABOUT
As an alternative to the all-way stop-control, a mini-roundabout was also considered. A roundabout operation analysis was performed at the intersection of Westside Boulevard – Westside Road and Buena Vista Road using SIDRA Intersection 8 software. Cumulative plus project peak hour volumes from the Hatch Mott Macdonald TIA were used to perform an operational analysis. For Cumulative conditions, the recommended mini-roundabout will operate at LOS A. It should be noted that the all- way stop-control intersection mitigation proposed by the Hatch Mott Macdonald TIA would operate as a LOS C in the AM peak hour and LOS B in the PM peak hour.

A mini-roundabout preliminary concept was developed per the NCHRP Report 672 Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (Guide) and is included in Attachment C. The recommended mini-roundabout includes a mountable central island and an inscribed circle diameter of 80 feet, which is between the 45- and 90-foot recommendations provided by the Guide. The recommended mini-roundabout conforms to the existing street section, which includes an 8-foot parking lane and a 6-foot Class II bike lane along Buena Vista Road to the west and an 8-foot parking lane and a 5-foot buffered Class II bike lane along Buena Vista Road to the east.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 384
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 3 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840 Neighborhood Traffic Assessment
Mitigation Measure T-4 recommends that a neighborhood traffic assessment be completed to evaluate the need to implement traffic calming measures to discourage project traffic from using residential streets as alternative routes.

ROADWAY SEGMENT VOLUMES
The Neighborhood Traffic Assessment evaluated the following roadway segments:

1. Buena Vista Road, west of Miller Road

2. Buena Vista Road, between Miller Road and Westside Boulevard

3. Buena Vista Road, east of Westside Boulevard

4. Miller Road, south of Buena Vista Road

5. Westside Boulevard, south of Buena Vista Road
The average daily traffic (ADT) for each roadway segment was compared with the acceptable daily thresholds identified in the City of Hollister General Plan. All the roadways evaluated are classified as a collector with an ADT threshold of 10,000 vehicles per day.

To achieve the ADT volumes, the PM peak hour volumes were multiplied by 10 (typically PM peak hour traffic volumes represent 10 percent of the daily traffic).Tables 1 and 2 summarize the ADT for the Existing and Cumulative conditions. In the Existing conditions, it is anticipated that the project will increase traffic by 42 to 137 percent, with most project trips traveling along Miller Road. During the Cumulative condition, it is anticipated that the project will increase traffic by 7 to 115 percent, with most project trips traveling along Miller Road. It should be noted that all the roadway segments are under the 10,000 daily vehicle threshold and can accommodate the additional project trips.

Table 1: Existing Roadway Segment Volume Summary
#Roadway Segment Direction Existing Existing
Plus Project
Increase in
Volume
1 Buena Vista
Road West of Miller Road
EB 1,610 2,130 32%
WB 1,050 1,810 72%
Total 2,660 3,940 48%
2 Buena Vista
Road
Between Miller Road
and Westside
Boulevard
EB 1,440 1,810 26%
WB 960 1,600 67%
Total 2,400 3,410 42%
3 Buena Vista
Road
East of Westside
Boulevard
EB 470 470 0%
WB 480 480 0%
Total 950 950 0%
4 Miller Road South of Buena Vista
NB 350 1,300 271%
SB 750 1,310 75%
Total 1,100 2,610 137%
5 Westside
Boulevard South of Buena Vista
NB 690 1,330 93%
SB 1,150 1,520 32%
Total 1,840 2,850 55%
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 385
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 4 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840 Table 2: Cumulative Roadway Segment Volume Summary
#Roadway Segment Direction Cumulative Cumulative
Plus Project
Increase in
Volume
1 Buena Vista
Road West of Miller Road
EB 3,490 4,010 15%
WB 2,190 3,010 37%
Total 5,680 7,020 24%
2 Buena Vista
Road
Between Miller Road
and Westside
Boulevard
EB 3,270 3,640 11%
WB 2,510 3,150 25%
Total 5,780 6,790 17%
3 Buena Vista
Road
East of Westside
Boulevard
EB 2,710 2,840 5%
WB 2,180 2,390 10%
Total 4,890 5,230 7%
4 Miller Road South of Buena Vista
NB 450 1,400 211%
SB 860 1,420 65%
Total 1,310 2,820 115%
5 Westside
Boulevard South of Buena Vista
NB 1,490 1,920 29%
SB 1,690 1,930 14%
Total 3,180 3,850 21%

VEHICLE SPEED
The 85th percentile speed was reviewed for the same roadway segments evaluated for the ADT volume. The 85th percentile speed represents the speed at which 85 percent of traffic does not exceed and is commonly used to determine a roadway speed limit. Existing 85th percentile speeds were used from the speed survey reported in the Woodle Pre-Zone and Annexation TIA, dated December 2018.

Table 3 summarizes the speed limit and 85% percentile speeds, where roadway segments with an 85th percentile speed 10 mph over the speed limit are shaded and bolded. The speed survey showed that 85th percentile speeds were 10 mph over the speed limit along the three Buena Vista Road roadway segments. The Woodle Pre-Zone and Annexation TIA noted that the speed survey showed a reduction in speed, of at least 5 mph, along Buena Vista Road near the vicinity of the Calaveras Elementary School between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 2:00 PM and 3:00 PM.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 386
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 5 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840 Table 3: Speed Summary
#Roadway Segment
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Direction
85th
Percentile
Speed
(mph)
1 Buena Vista
Road West of Miller Road 30 EB 47
WB 43
2 Buena Vista
Road
Between Miller Road and
Westside Boulevard 25 EB 42
WB 44
3 Buena Vista
Road
East of Westside
Boulevard 30 EB 43
WB 34
4 Miller Road South of Buena Vista 25 NB 25
SB 24
5 Westside
Boulevard South of Buena Vista 30 NB 27
SB 24
Note: 85th percentile speed 10 mph above speed limit are bolded and shaded.

Source: Hexagon, 2018

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
After review of the roadway volumes and speeds within the project area, it was concluded that that the nearby roadways will have the capacity to accommodate increased traffic due to the project, and vehicles along Buena Vista Road travel at speeds that exceed the posted speed limit. To address the issue of excessive speeding along Buena Vista Road, the following improvements can be made:
·Curb extensions/bulb-outs: Curb extension will narrow the roadway, which may lower vehicle speeds. Bulb-outs are curb extensions at an intersection and offer the additional benefit of a shortened distance pedestrians need to travel across a roadway. ·Buffered bicycle lanes:An alternative to curb extensions, buffered bicycle lanes will narrow the roadway, which may lower vehicle speeds. The buffered bicycle lane would also provide a dedicated lane for a bicyclist along Buena Vista Road with the added offset from the vehicle travel way.
·Raised crosswalk:Calaveras Elementary school is located within walking distance to the proposed project and would require pedestrians to cross Buena Vista Road. It is recommended that a raised crosswalk be installed. A raised crosswalk would help improve visibility of pedestrians crossing Buena Vista Road and would require vehicles to slow down when traveling over the crosswalk.

In addition to the improvements above, the project could make a fair share contribution towards the future installation of traffic calming measures.

Effects on Transit, Bicyclists, and Pedestrians
Mitigation Measure T-5 recommends that an evaluation of the project’s effect on transit service and bicycle and pedestrian circulation in the study area be conducted.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 387
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 6 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840

TRANSIT
County Express Transit System provides transit service within the study area. There are two local bus routes (Blue Line and Green Line) that operate within the study area along Central Avenue and San Juan Road. The nearest bus stop to the proposed project is located on Central Avenue between Gonzalez Drive and Miller Road.

The project may increase the demand on the existing transit service. Based on the U.S. Census1, 0.5 percent of residents in Hollister utilize transit to commute to work, which equates to the project generating approximately one (1) trip in the AM peak and two (2) trips in the PM peak. It is estimated that the existing transit system should be able to accommodate the new transit riders generated by the project.

BICYCLISTS
Within the study area, the following Class II bicycle lanes exist:
· Buena Vista Road (south side only) between Locust Avenue and west of Beresini Lane · Westside Boulevard between Buena Vista Road and Nash Road · San Juan Road between Westside Boulevard and west of Millar Road The proposed project could increase the number of bicyclists in the area. However, the existing bicycle facilities are limited and discontinuous, so bicyclists will have to share the roadway with vehicles, which may discourage the use of bicycles in the area. The San Benito County Bikeway and Pedestrian Master Plan identified 46 bikeways in the City of Hollister to provide better connectivity for bicyclists. There is uncertainty when all the proposed bikeways will be constructed since many are not fully funded. Until these projects are constructed, bicyclists will have to share the roadway with vehicles.

PEDESTRIANS
Near the proposed project there are no sidewalks along the north side of Buena Vista Road and along the south side of Buena Vista Road adjacent to undeveloped parcels (i.e. between Miller Road and Calaveras Elementary School). The project is proposing to install sidewalk on the north side of Buena Vista Road along its project frontage. The proposed project may increase pedestrian activity within the area, specifically pedestrians crossing Buena Vista Road to travel to Calaveras Elementary School, located on the south side of Buena Vista Road, approximately three blocks east of the project site. Currently there are no existing sidewalks or crosswalks to accommodate this pedestrian route.

However, with the proposed mini-roundabout at the intersection of Buena Vista Road and Gonzalez Drive, crosswalks would be added on each leg. This would provide a pedestrian path from the project to the south side of Buena Vista Road.
1 U.S. Census Bureau. 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Means of Transportation to Work By Age.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 388
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 7 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840 It is assumed that the project will construct sidewalks within the development and on the north side Buena Vista Road, along the frontage of the project site. Mitigation Measure T-6 identifies that the project will pay a fair share towards the improvements identified in the Safe Routes to School assessment, which includes curb extensions, pavement striping, and sidewalk improvements on Buena Vista Road. In addition, the TIA recommends that the project construct a curb extension at the northwest corner and stripe a high visibility yellow crosswalk across the west leg of the intersection of the Miller Road and Buena Vista Road. With these improvements the project would help to enhance the existing pedestrian facilities, however many gaps will remain, since other necessary improvements rely on existing future developments to install sidewalks along existing undeveloped parcels. Since the timing of these developments are unknown, project-related traffic would be forced to walk along undeveloped roadway shoulders along Buena Vista Road.

Fair Share Calculation
The December 2015 TIA recommends that the project pay a fair share towards several roadway improvements located at:
· Gonzalez Drive and Buena Vista Road (Condition Number 11iv) · Westside Boulevard – Westside Road and Buena Vista Road (Condition Number 11vi and Mitigation Measure T-2)
· State Route 156 and Buena Vista Road (Mitigation Measure T-1) · Westside Boulevard and San Juan Road – Fourth Street (Mitigation Measure T-3) · Along Buena Vista Road between Project site and Calaveras Elementary School (Mitigation Measure T-6)
Kimley-Horn determined the fair share percentage, as shown in Table 4, that the project would need to contribute towards for the locations listed above. The fair share percentage was determined using the Caltrans’ Equation C-1, Equitable Share Responsibility, from the Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies2. The calculations are shown in Attachment D. It should also be noted that the fair share calculations were determined using the volumes developed in the TIA. However, if more recent Cumulative volumes are used from the Woodle TIA, then the fair share percentages decrease due to the increase in Cumulative volumes, as shown in Table 5. These calculations are shown in Attachment E.
2 Caltrans.Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. December 2002.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 389
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 8 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840 Table 4: Fair Share Percentages (using the TIA volumes) Location Condition Number/
Mitigation Measure Improvement Fair Share %
Intersection #1
State Route 156 and Buena
Vista Road
Mitigation Measure T-1 Install traffic signal 22.3%
Intersection #3
Westside Boulevard –
Westside Road / Buena Vista
Road
Condition Number 11vi
Mitigation Measure T-2
Install all-way stop control
and eastbound right-turn
lane or mini-roundabout

18.9%
Intersection #5
Westside Boulevard and San
Juan Road
Mitigation Measure T-3 Optimize signal timing 100%A
Intersection #6
Gonzalez Drive and Buena
Vista Road
Condition Number 11vi Construct roundabout or
other calming measure 27.9%
Buena Vista Road between
Project Site and Calaveras
Elementary School
Mitigation Measure T-6
Construct curb extension,
pavement striping, and
sidewalk improvements

23.0%
A The TIA mentions that the developer would be responsible for paying the improvement costs. Therefore, 100% of the costs was assumed.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 390
Kimley >>>Horn

Page 9 ends

kimley-horn.com 4637 Chabot Dr., Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925-398-4840 Table 5: Fair Share Percentages (using the Woodle Pre-Zone and Annexation TIA volumes) Location Condition Number/
Mitigation Measure Improvement Fair Share %
Intersection #1
State Route 156 and Buena
Vista Road
Mitigation Measure T-1 Install traffic signal 5.8%
Intersection #3
Westside Boulevard –
Westside Road / Buena Vista
Road
Condition Number 11vi
Mitigation Measure T-2
Install all-way stop control
and eastbound right-turn
lane or mini-roundabout

16.5%
Intersection #5
Westside Boulevard and San
Juan Road
Mitigation Measure T-3 Optimize signal timing 100%A
Intersection #6
Gonzalez Drive and Buena
Vista Road
Condition Number 11vi Construct roundabout or
other calming measure 27.9%B
Buena Vista Road between
Project Site and Calaveras
Elementary School
Mitigation Measure T-6
Construct curb extension,
pavement striping, and
sidewalk improvements

15.5%
A The TIA mentions that the developer would be responsible for paying the improvement costs. Therefore, 100% of the costs was assumed.

B This intersection was not studied in the Woodle TIA and therefore the same percentage as listed in Table 4 was assumed.

Attachments:

Attachment A – Concept for Mini-Roundabout at Gonzalez Drive and Buena Vista Road Attachment B – Concept for All-way Stop Control at Westside Boulevard and Buena Vista Road Attachment C – Concept for Mini-Roundabout at Westside Boulevard and Buena Vista Road Attachment D – Fair Share Calculations (using TIA volumes) Attachment E – Fair Share Calculations (using Woodle TIA volumes) G.2.a
Packet Pg. 391
Kimley >>>Horn

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 392Kimley>>> Horn
m
~
CD
:II
Ill
< iii' ...

Ill
f
Ill
A.

Future Gonzalez Drive
Note:

ICD = Inscribed Circle Diameter

DRAFT CONCEPT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSE ONLY
Gonzalez Drive at Buena Vista Road I EXHIBIT 1 s~ALf¥
Mini-Roundabout Concept 4-----'--...;.;.-"'-"--

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 393Kimley>>> Horn

DRAFT CONCEPT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSE ONLY
Westside Boulevard at Buena Vista Road I EXHIBIT 2 s9_ALf¥ All-Way Stop Control Concept ___ .,__..;..a...__-

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 394
19'
Kimley >>> Horn
12'
l
\
m
~
CD
::II m
< iii'
i
[

5.5' BIKE LANE WITH
3' BUFFER
)(

CONSTRAINED LOCATION

FOR A SIDEWALK RAMP
Assumed City Right of Way
ICD Inscribed Circle Diameter
Note :

Dimensioned lane width is to the gutter lip
on Westside Road .

DRAFT CONCEPT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSE ONLY
Westside Boulevard at Buena Vista Road I EXHIBIT 1 s9_ALf¥ Mini-Roundabout Concept 5~-----'--.....;..;-""-"--

# Location Fair Share %Peak Period Existing Vol Project Vol Future Vol % Fair Share AM 805 63 1058 19.9%
PM 1065 84 1357 22.3%
AM 480 76 827 18.0%
PM 268 101 701 18.9%
AM 291 147 701 26.4%
PM 266 195 769 27.9%
Location Fair Share %Peak Period Existing Vol Project Vol Future Vol % Fair Share AM 451 717 22.2%
Based on Int 2 359 76 614
Based on int 3 451 76 717
PM 240 578 23.0%
Based on Int 2 230 101 537
Based on int 3 240 101 578
Intersections
Roadway Segments
Mirabella II Project - Fair Share Calculations (using TIA volumes) 1 3
SR 156 / Buena Vista Road
Westside Boulevard - Westside
Road / Buena Vista Road

22.3%

18.9%
6 Project Driveway #1 / Buena
Vista Road 27.9%
Buena Vista Road between
Project Site and Calaveras
Elementary School

23.0%
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 395

# Location Fair Share %Peak Period Existing Vol Project Vol Future Vol % Fair Share AM 927 63 2010 5.8%
PM 1053 84 2946 4.4%
AM 586 76 1047 16.5%
PM 360 101 1099 13.7%
AM
PM
Location Fair Share %Peak Period Existing Vol Project Vol Future Vol % Fair Share AM 564 977 15.5%
Based on Int 2 28 76 28
Based on int 3 564 76 977
PM 308 962 13.4%
Based on Int 2 36 101 36
Based on int 3 308 101 578
Roadway Segments
Mirabella II Project - Fair Share Calculations (using Woodle TIA volumes) Intersections
1 SR 156 / Buena Vista Road 5.8%
3 Westside Boulevard - Westside
Road / Buena Vista Road 16.5%
6 Project Driveway #1 / Buena
Vista Road N/A
Buena Vista Road between
Project Site and Calaveras
Elementary School

15.5%
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 396

C. PUBLIC WORKSHOP #1 MATERIALS AND COMMUNITY COMMENTS

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 397
Kimley >>>Horn

City of Hollister |Ciudad de Hollister
Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming Meeting
Reunión para calmar el tráfico en Buena Vista Road
Por favor, únase a nosotros para la primera
reunión virtual para hablar de calmar el
tráfico en la Buena Vista Road. La reunión
hablará sobre las condiciones actuales
del vecindario y los posibles tratamientos
en las carreteras para reducir la velocidad
y el tráfico de paso.

We look forward to seeing you there!
¡Esperamos verlos allí!
Hosted by the City of Hollister & Kimley-Horn
Alojado por la Ciudad de Hollister y Kimley-Horn
Fecha: Miércoles, 24 de marzo de 2021
Hora:6:30 PM - 8:00 PM
Please join us for a virtual meeting to
discuss traffic calming on Buena Vista
Road. The meeting will discuss the current
neighborhood conditions and potential
roadway treatments to reduce vehicle
speed and reduce cut-through traffic.

Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Time:6:30 PM - 8:00 PM
LET’S CA L M T R A F FIC!
LL EE TT ’SS CC AA LL MM TT RR AA FF FFIICC!!
¡C ALME M O S E L T R Á FICO!
We want your input! Scan the QR
code below to complete a ques-
tionarre about the proposed
¡Queremos su opinión! Escanee el código
QR a continuación para completar un
cuestionario sobre los tratamientos pro-
puestos para las carreteras.
(English)(Español)
Click the link below to join the meeting:

Haga clic en el enlace de abajo para unirse a la reunión:

Para más información contacte:
(831) 636 - 4340x1226
(831) 636 - 4340x1218
For more information contact:
[email protected]
[email protected]
https://kimley-horn.zoom.us/j/98676491653
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 398Ki111,___' _., _. '____,

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey English or Español
English Survey Link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BuenaVistaENG Encuesta en Español Enlace: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BuenaVistaESP G.2.a
Packet Pg. 399

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey The following survey outlines the existing travel conditions and proposed traffic calming measures for Buena Vista Road. City staff intends to take these recommendations with your input to City Council for approval and implementation.

The beginning of the survey shows the project team's traffic data collection findings. Following the data, we present the concepts, and the survey requires your input on the layouts. The responses require a “Yes” or a “No” selection. If you agree with the layout but want to reply with comments, please select “Yes” and provide a comment with it. If you do not agree with the measure, select “No” and provide a comment for an alternative measure or why you do not prefer the layout.

Your feedback will be presented at the City Council meeting and we encourage you to attend. The date of the City Council meeting is to be determined.

Thank you for participating in our survey. Your feedback is important.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 400

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Data Collection Findings
Daily Volumes
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 401
# Roadway Segment Direction Cumulative Cumulative Increase in Plus Project Volume
EB 3,490 4 ,010 '15%
1 Buena Vista West of Miller Road WB 2 ,190 3 ,010 37% Road Total 5,680 7 ,020 24%
Between Miller Road EB 3 ,270 3 ,640 11%
2 Buena Vista and Westside WB 2,510 3 ,150 25% Road Bo ulevard Total 5,780 6 ,790 17% EB 2,710 2 ,840 5%
3 Buena Vista East of Westside WB 2,180 2 ,390 10% Road Boulevard Total 4,890 5 ,230 7%
NB 450 1,400 211%
4 Miller Road South of Buena V rsta SB 860 1 ,420 65%
Total 1,310 2 ,820 115%
NB 1,490 1,920 29%
5 Westside South of Buena Vista SB 1,690 1,930 14% Bou levard Total 3,180 3,850 ·21%

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Data Collection Findings
Weekday Average Daily Traffic
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 402

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Data Collection Findings
Average Speed and 85th Percentile Speed
Speed limits are determined based on the 85th percentile speeds and based on the data, the current 25/30 mph speed limit would have to be increased to 40/45 mph for enforcement purposes. Instead, if traffic calming measures are implemented, the 85th percentile speed is expected to be lower and the speed limit will remain at 25/30 mph.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 403

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

1. Do you like the Traffic Circle at Gonzales Drive? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 404
0 0
mu
OPCSED 80' ICO I I ROI.I O •BO T,
( E AUE N TI\IE T CONTR OL
Ir. TER E:Cll I.A YO T)

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

2. Do you like the improvements at Beresini Lane? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 405
0 0
LANE TIW<SITICr4 A f
;l..'I, MPH Of.:sm.N SPl£m
t ND 81 t
I.ff
BUENA VISTA R_D_~
"' fil
Cit
~

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

3. Do you like the bike lane on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 406
0 0

BUENA VISTA RO

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

4. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 407
0 0

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

5. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 408
0 0
rA~C ,;1:tflO': LU'T" rvm-1
LN£ ,'CCE55 ~O FERM ST
10 lilAINTAIN SIGHT
C!!'TANCI: Al Hill. OftBT
HSTAl.1 OBJNEA TORS YlllHIN ~m1rm aumR TO ett~I.

W>«l.LTIV1"ll-W"''t

City of Hollister - Buena Vista Road Proposed Implementation Plan Public Survey Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

6. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 409
0 0
'l'Wt)aLANI!; l!I M.KOH) ~
'WITH SlRIPW MEIJIAN IIUfJER

Calma del tráfico de Buena Vista
Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming
Marzo de 24 2021| March 24 2021
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 410Kim/ey >» Horn

Zoom Webinar Attendee Controls
Control de Seminario Web Zoom
Audio Settings:

Change
your audio
settings . You can
also click the
upward arrow (^)
next to change
your speaker.

Unmute/Mute:When the host gives
you permission, you can unmute and
all participants will be able to hear you
talk.If the host allows you to talk, you
will receive this notification -click
“unmute myself”
Raise Hand:Raise
your hand in the
webinar to indicate
that you want to
make a comment.

Question &
Answer:Open the Q&A
window, allowing you to
ask questions. The hosts
can either reply via text in
the Q&A window or
answer your question
live.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 411Kimley>>> Horn
The ho.st Wc:J'Uld lll(-e, 101;1 to unmut,e, y01.,1r
l!fflierophone

Calma del tráfico de Buena Vista
Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming
Marzo de 24 2021| March 24 2021
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 412Kim/ey >» Horn

Reglas del Compromiso | Rules of Engagement

1.Respect each others’ time

2.Each comment has merit & deserves to be listened to

3.Respect each others’ points

4.No rude interruptions

5.Raise your hand if you want to speak

6.No personal comments,
unless they will make everyone smile

1.Respetar el tiempode todos

2.Cad a comentario tieneméritoy & merece ser
escuchado

3.Respeten los puntos de todos

4.No interrupciones grosera s

5.Levante su mano si deseahablar

6.No haga comentariospersonales, a menos que hagan todos sonreír G.2.a
Packet Pg. 413Kimley>>> Horn

Diario/Agenda
•Project Background
•Traffic Data Collection
•Traffic Calming Toolbox
•Traffic Calming Concepts
•Online survey results
•Next Steps…
•Antecedentes del proyec to
•Recopilación de datos de tráfico
•Caja de herramientas para calmar el tráfico
•Conceptos de calmamiento del
tráfico
•Re sultados de la enc uesta en linea
•Siguentes Pasos…
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 414Kimley>>> Horn

Antecedentes del proyecto
Project Background
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 415Kimley>>> Horn

S
a
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
Condiciones existentes en Buena Vista Road
Buena Vista Road Existing Conditions
M
i
l
l
e
r

R
d
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
No
r
t
h
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
Downtown
Hollister
Calaveras
Elementary
School
Be
r
e
s
i
n
i
Ln
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 416

Pa
r
k

S
t
O
l
i
v
e

S
t
Condiciones existentes en Buena Vista Road
Buena Vista Road Existing Conditions
•Provides driveway access to
homes on south side and new
development on north side
•Agriculture on north side
•Classified as a 2 -lane collector
street
•Roadway cross-section varies
in width (24’ to 60’)
•Connects to San Benito St and
SR 156
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 417
45 '
VAR IE S 1,5' 12' &' 1,2' 5' 5'
GRA VE L S HOU LDER TRA VEL LAt.J E. TRAVEL LANE CLASS II P MKING PRII/E SIDE Ii. DR IVEWAY WE SlBOUt,10 EASTB OUND BIKE WAY WA LK
Lr.NE &'.

TREE S
L____J
I-

EXISTING BU ENA VISTA ROAD C ROSS-SECTION

Pa
r
k

S
t
O
l
i
v
e

S
t
Borrador del plan completo de calles de Buena Vista Road Draft Buena Vista Road Complete Street Plan
•City of Hollister Complete Streets Plan 2020 –Buena Vista identified as a key corridor for improvement •Goal to provide Near Term and Long Term Complete Street Improvements for all users G.2.a
Packet Pg. 418
I
Kimley >>> Horn

Recopilación de datos de tráfico
Traffic Data Collection
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 419Kimley>>> Horn

Recopilación de datos de tráfico
Traffic Data Collection
Los datos de tráfico en Buena Vista se
recopilaron para determinar lo siguiente:

1.El exceso de velocidad es
significativo?

2.Cuáles son los volúmenes de
tráfico?

3.Qué medidas de calma del tráfico son
apropiadas para el proyecto?
Traffic data on Buena Visa was
collected to determine the following:

1.Is speeding significant?

2.What are the traffic volumes?

3.Which traffic calming measures
are approp riate for the project?
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 420Kimley>>> Horn

Tr á fico Diario Promedio de lunes a viernes| Existing Average Daily Traffic P
a
l
m

S
t
Vi
n
e

S
t
2130
13 3
0 15
2 0
1810
Traffic Volume
Recopilación de datos de tráfico
Traffic Data Collection
13 0
0 1
3 1
0 480
470
Sa
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
M
i
l
l
e
r

R
d
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
1600
1810
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 421Kimley>>> Horn

Tr áfico Diario Promedio de lunes a viernes| Future Average Daily Traffic P
a
l
m

S
t
Vi
n
e

S
t
3010
19 2
0 19
3 0
4010
Traffic Volume
Recopilación de datos de tráfico
Traffic Data Collection
14 0
0 14
2 0
2390
2840
Sa
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
M
i
l
l
e
r

R
d
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
2510
3270
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 422Kimley>>> Horn

Velocidad del Percentil 85| 85th Percentile Speed
P
a
l
m

S
t
Vi
n
e

S
t
43 47
85 % Speed
(MPH)
Recopilación de datos de tráfico
Traffic Data Collection
44 43
Sa
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
M
i
l
l
e
r

R
d
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
44 42
Speed Limit should be 40 to 45 mph
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 423Kimley>>> Horn

Caja de instrumentos para calmar
el tráfico
Traffic Calming Toolbox
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 424Kimley>>> Horn

Caja de instrumentos para calmar el tráfico
Traffic Calming Toolbox
Tipo de medidas para calmar el tráfico | Types of Traffic Calming Measures Deflexiones
Horizontal
Horizontal
Shifts
Deflexiones
Vertical
Vertical
Shifts
Cierres
(de Carretera)
Closures
Cambio de
Comportamiento
Behavior
Changes
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 425Kimley>>> Horn

Cosas para considerar mientras calmando el tráfico
Things to Consider with Traffic Calming Devices
•Appropriateness
(volume/speed limit)
•Effectiveness
•Bicycle and pedestrian activity
•Parking
•Emergency vehicle and bus
access
•Commun i ty impact
•Noise
•Lo Apropiado (volumen /límitede velocidad)
•Eficacia
•Actividades peatonales y de
bicicleta
•Estacionamiento
•Acceso para vehiculos de
emergencia y buses
•Impacto a la comunidad
•Ruido
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 426Kimley>>> Horn

Ejemplo de caja
de
herramientas
para calmar el
tráfico (Central
Avenue)
Traffic Calming
Toolbox
Example
(Central
Avenue)
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 427

HERRAMIENTAS PARA CALLES COMPLETAS

COMPLETE STREETS TOOLBOX
Desplazamiento Horizontal/Horizontal Shifts

OESPLAZAMIENTO LATERA L/

LATERAL SHIFT/C HICANE

EXTENSION DEL BOROILLO/

CURB EXTENSION

OESVIADOR DIAGONA L/

DIAGONAL DIVERTER

BARRERA MEDIANA

MEDIAN BARRIER
Desplazamiento Vertical/Vertical Shifts

ISLA MEOIANA/

MEDIAN ISLAND

INTERSECCION REALINEAOA/

REALIGNED INTERSECTION

CIRCULOS DE TAAFICO/PEQUENITO-GLORIETA

TRAFFIC CIRCLE/MINI -ROUNDABOUT PASO DE PEATONES/

RA ISED CROSSWALK

INTERSECCION ELEVAOA/

RA ISED INTERSECTION

JOROBAS/COJINES/MESAS DE VELOCIOAO/

SPEED CUSHIONS/HUMPS/TABLES
Cierres/Closures Cambio de Comportamiento/Behavior Changes

CIERRE PARCIAL

PARTIAL CLOSURE

CIERRE COMPLETO

FULL CLOSURE

TRATAMIENTO OE PAVIMENTO/

PAVEMENT TREATMENT

CALMAR EL TRAFICO EN AVENIDA CENTRAL

CENTRAL AVENUE TRAFFIC CALMING
SENALES OE LlMITE DEL RADAR
RADAR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS Kimley >>> Horn

Conceptos para calmar el tráfico
de Buena Vista Road
Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming
Concepts
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 428Kimley>>> Horn

Conceptos para calmar el tráfico de Buena Vista
Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming Concepts
Objetivos de calmamiento del tráfico:

1.Reducir la velocidad del vehículo

2.Mejorar el acceso y la seguridad de
la bicicleta y los peatones

3.Mantener el estacionamiento en la
calle y el acceso a la entrada
Traffic Calming Objectives:

1.Reduce vehicle speeds

2.Improve bicycle and pedestrian
access and sa fety

3.Maintain on-street parking and
driveway access
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 429Kimley>>> Horn

•Mini-roundabouts and
traffic circles are center
islands placed in
unsignalized
intersections for traffic
to circulate around.
•Drivers must slow to a
speed that allows them
to comfortably
maneuver around
them.

Círculos de Tráfico /Mini-Glorietas
Traffic Circle/ Mini-Roundabout
•Mini -Glorietas y círculos de tráfico son islas centrales colocadas en intersecciones no señalizadas para que el tráfico circule alrededor. •Los conductores deben reducir la velocidad a una velocidad que les permita maniobrar cómodamente a su alrededor.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 430Kimley>>> Horn

Benefits
•May have up to 10% reduction in speed
•Can be designed to incorporate bicycle facilities
Drawbacks
•May simply shift speeding and traffic volume to the next street over •Increase trip lengths
Beneficios
•Puede tener hasta un 10% de reducción de velocidad
•Puede ser diseñado para incorporar instalaciones de bicicletas Desventajas
•Puede simplemente cambiar la velocidad y el volumen del tráfico a la siguiente calle sobre •Aumenta tiempo de viajes
Círculos de Tráfico /Mini-Glorietas
Traffic Circle/ Mini-Roundabout
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 431Kimley>>> Horn

S
a
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
Concepto 1 -Mini-Glorietas
Concept 1 –Mini Roundabout
Go
n
z
a
l
e
s

D
r
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
No
r
t
h
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
Downtown
Hollister
Calaveras
Elementary
School
Be
r
e
s
i
n
i
Ln
Mirabella
Development
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 432

Proyecto de crecimiento del uso de la tierra al norte de Buena Vista Road Draft Land Use Growth North of Buena Vista Road
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 433
L .J Plann ing Area
c:] Urban Service Area
L "'II Sphere of Influence
c:J City Limit
Buena Vista No rth Gateway c::J ExtellS ion -Specia l Pl anning Arna D Pa rcels
• Poten Ua l Neighborhood
Commerda l Nooe

2.5 50 100
Mlll!.S
General Plan Land Use
CJ Low Density Resiclentia I
D Medi um Density Resideritia l
D Hi gh Der.sity Residential
Mixed Use
General Commercial
D North Gateway Co mmercial
D Industrial
D Publi c
D Agricultur e
Open Space
d.f~~rfil'F.:"'.;i':'::"'~;,:.:.~~~!_J Linear park and bfkeway along new east/west roadway
to buffer residentia l and
agricultural uses
""C e::::
-~' ~ J c:•-----..
ro
V')
' f ,
' r
J

Concepto 1 -Mini-Glorietas
Concept 1 –Mini Roundabout
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 434
PL

VAR IES

CON FORM TO
l"RO OS EO

BU ENA VISTA

CROSS -SECTI ON
1 5'
GRA VE L SHOU LDrn tRA\IEL LAN E
& DR IVEWAY WE SlBOU.N lD
I\
1 2'
mAvEL LAN E

EAS TB ,IJUND
OP OS ED 8 0' ICD MINI RO NDABO T.

AL T CON l OL
S ECll
CONF O:R t.t TO P RO POS ---'

BLJ ENA VI STA CROSS-SECTI ON
6' 12' 5' 5'
CL,ASS II PlilRKl,NG OR l"o'E SI DE

EI IKE WAY WA LK
LAINE "' m EE S
-
BUSTING BU EN A v rsTA ROAD CROSS-S ECT (ON
PL
1/A~IE S
GRAV EL SHO!.J LO ER
& DR IVE WA "II
I
s· 3' 11 1 11 ' J ' 5•
CLAS S ~ lRAVE L L.biliE TR Av£L LA NE ·~ Cl.ASS·
II BIKE 'l'IESTSOUND EA STBOUND II BIKE IL tL
LA E ::) ~ LA~E lilJ m
w w
D.. ,g_
~ if I-1VJ1
-

PROPOS ED BUBNA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
{VI.STA LN T O LOCUST AVE1
PL
7' 51 5-'
PAR KING: DR IVE SIDE WAY-WA LK &:

TR EE S
r-l I I

Concepto 1 –Mini-Glorietas
Concept 1 –Mini Roundabout
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 435
ROP SED 80' ICO MI NI ROUND · 0 T.
· EE AL lE R .Tl ;E T ONTRO L
I TER ECll LA YO T)
Kimley >>> Horn

M TO HOP SEO
\il S TA CROSS -SECTI O oo, W I _,
<(
N z , a ,-,..,
l V

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 436

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 437
PL
VARIES 15'

GRAVEL SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE
& DRIVEWAY WESTBOUND

LANE TRANSITION AT
35 ~PH DE$GN SPEED
>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008191 DECEMBER 2020
PL
5'
SIDE
WALK
L___J

ENO BIKE
LANE
PL
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOIJLOER
& DRIVEWAY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLAN NING PURPOSES .
5' J' 11'
CLASS 0:: TRAVEL LANE
II BIKE ~ WESTBOUND
LANE :::,
m ..,
n.
~
V,
<t.
45'
11'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
J'
0::
~ :::, m ..,
n.
~
5'
CLASS

II BIKE
LANE

PROPOSED BU E NA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(BERESINI LN TO BRANDY CT)
PL
7' 5' 5'
PARKING DR IVE SIDE WAY WALK "' TREES
~ L___J
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVE 1 -S HEET 2

CITY OF HOLLISTER -BUENA V ISTA RO

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 438
PL >> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008191 DECEMBER 2020
PL
5•
SIDE
WALK
L___J
PL
VARIES

GRAVEL SHOIJLDER
& DRIVEWAY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLAN NING PURPOSES .
5• 3' 11'
CLASS 0:: TRAVEL LANE
II BIKE ~ WESTBOUND
LANE :::, m
"" "-~
V,
<t.
45'
11'

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
3'
0::
~ :::, m
"" "-~
5•
CLASS

II BIKE
LANE

PROPOSED BU E NA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
(BERESINI L N TO BRANDY CT)
PL
7' 5• 5•

PARK ING DR IVE SIDE WAY WALK &
TREES
~ L___J
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVE 1 -SHEET 4

CITY OF HOLLISTER -BUENA V ISTA RO

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 439
L
61'
5' VARIES 11'-1 9' 15' 12· 6' 12· 5'

SIDE PARKING TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE CLASS II PARKING DRIVE

WALK WESTBOUND EASTBOUND BIKE WAY

LAN E &
TREES
r--7 -, ~

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTIO N
Kimley >>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008191 DECEMBER 2020

BUENA VISTA RD
PLPL
5' 5' 7' 5'

SID E SIDE PARK ING CLASS

WALK WALK II BIKE
LANE
L...__...J

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES .
<t.
61'

VAR IES
3' 11' 4'-11' 11· 3' 5'
Q'. TRAVEL LAN E MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE Q'. CLASS ~ WESTBOUND CENTER EASTBOUND ~ II BIKE :,, lURN LANE :,, LANE m m .... ....

0.. 0..
~ ~
Vl Vl

PROPOSED BU E NA V ISTA ROAD CROSS-S ECT ION
(V ISTA LN TO LOCUST AVE )
p
7' 5' 5'

P ARK ING DR IVE SID E WAY WALK
&
TREES
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIO N ALTERNATIVE 1 -SHEET 10

CITY OF HOLLI ST ER -BU ENA VISTA RO

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 440
~ __ __,,...,...
::J
51====>
f--
~ !~========
10·
TREES
&
SIDE
WALK
29'

TRAVEL LANE

WESTBOUND
(UNMARKED )
ct
58'
29 '

TRAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
(UNMARKED)
PROVIDE CENlER LEFT TURN

LANE ACCESS INTO FERN ST

TO MAINTAIN SIGHT
DISTANCE AT Hill. CREST
10· 5'
TREES
&
SIDE
WALK
SIDE
WALK
s· s·

TREES CLASS

II BIK E
LANE
~L-----------1~

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION

GRAPHIC SCA LE IN FEET
0 25 50 100 CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES .
ct
58'
3• 11' 11' 11· 8 '
0:: TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE ~~ ~
"'-WESTBOUND CENlER EASTBOUND
:, TURN LANE :, >> Horn ~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ALTERNAT IV E 1 -SHEET 11 MF-197008191 DECEMBER 2020 CITY OF HO LLI ST ER -BUENA V ISTA RO UJ z
::J
I
0 f--
<! ~

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 441
s·
SI DE
WALJ -w
0:: w
1-z
0 ~
VARIES 24'-27'
1RAVEL LANE

EASTBOUND
5'
SIDE
WALK
~L----------__J~

EXISTING BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
Kimley >>> Horn GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
~
MF-197008191 DECEMBER 2020
I-
(/)
z
0 (/) a..
~
0 I
I-
s·
SIDE
WALK

VAR IE S

PARK ING
s· :r
CLASS a:: w
II BIK E "--"--LANE :,
a,
w

0..
~
VI
ce

TWO-LANE RAILROAD CROSSING
WITH 51RIPED MEDI AN BUFFER
Ct.

VAR IES 48' SJ' -
11' 11' :r s·
1RAVEL LANE 1RAVEL LANE a:: CLASS w
WESTBOUND EASTBOUND "--II BIKE "--:, LANE a,
w

0..
~
VI

PROPOSED BU E NA V ISTA ROAD CROSS-S ECT ION
(FERN ST TO SAN BEN ITO ST)

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES .

VAR IES

PARK ING
s·
I-
(/)
~ z w
CD
z
~
SIDE
WALK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVE 1 -SHEET 13

CITY O F HOLLI ST ER -BU ENA V ISTA RO

•Raised island located along the street centerline that narrows the travel lanes at that location.
•Median islands can be in conj unction with curb extensions or at crosswalks to provide staged pedestrian crossings Isla Central | Median Island
•La isla elevada ubicada a lo largo de la línea central de la calle que estrecha los carriles de viaje en esa ubicación. •Las islas medianas pueden estar en conjunto con las extensiones de bordillo o en los cruces peatonales para proporcionar cruces peatonales graduales G.2.a
Packet Pg. 442Kimley>>> Horn

Benefits
•May have up to 5% reduction in speed
•Safety can be improved without substantially increasing delay Drawbacks
•May force bicyclists to share travel lanes with motor vehicles •May require removal of some on-street parking
Beneficios
•Puede tener hasta un 5% de
reducción de velocidad.
•La seguridad puede mejorarse sin
aumentar sustancialmente el
retraso
Desventajas
•Puede obligar a los ciclistas a
compartir carriles de viaje con
vehículos motorizados
•Puede requerir la eliminación de
algunos estacionamientos en la
calle
Isla Central | Median Island
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 443Kimley>>> Horn

Speed Limit Sign: Defines the legal driving speed under normal conditions.

Radar Sign:

Displays regulatory speed limit sign with radar speed
feedback sign with real -time speed of an approaching vehicle, reducing motorists’ speed.

Pictures
Señales de límite de velocidad/ del radar
Speed Limit Signs/Radar Speed Limit Signs
Señal de límite de velocidad: define la velocidad de conducción legal en condiciones normales.

Señal de Radar:

Muestra regulatorio señal de limite de velocidad con señalde respuesta de velocidad de radar con la velocidad entiemporeal de un vehiculoque se aproxima, reduciendola velocidad de los automovilistas.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 444Kimley>>> Horn

Benefits
•Does not physically restrict
driver maneuvers and will not impose speed reductions on emergency and transit vehicles •Involves a standard traffic control device easily recognized by motorists Drawbacks
•Light pollution
Beneficios
•No restringe físicamente las
maniobras del conductor y no
impondrá reducciones de velocidad
en vehículos de emergencia y
tránsito
•Implica un dispositivo de control de
tráfico estándar fácilmente
reconocible por los automovilistas
Desventajas
•La contaminación lumínica
Señales de límite de velocidad/ del radar
Speed Limit Signs/Radar Speed Limit Signs
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 445Kimley>>> Horn

Online Survey Results
Re sultados de la encuesta en linea
English
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BuenaVistaENG
Español
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BuenaVistaESP
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 446Kimley>>> Horn

Survey Results
Re sultados de la encuesta en linea
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 447
Do you li ke the Traffic Ci rcle at Gonzales Drive?
Skipped: 1
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% SO% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do you l ike the im provemen t s at Be r esin i Lane?
Answered: 7 Skipped: 2
Yes
No
0% 10 % 20% 30% 4 0% 50% 6 0% 70% 80% 9 0% 100%
Kimley >>> Horn
nm;---
/
PROPOS ED 80' ICO loll I ROU NDABO UT.
(SEE ALTER ATM: S TOP CONTROL
li'ITE:RSECTI LA YOUT)
BUENA VISTA R_D __

Survey Results
Re sultados de la encuesta en linea
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 448
Do you li ke the b i ke l ane on Buena V ista Road?
Answered: 8 Skipped: 1

BUENA VISTA RO
------
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 5 0% 60% 70% 80% 9 0% 100%
Do you li ke the im provemen t s on Buena V ist a Road? Answered: 8 Skipped: 1
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Kimley >>> Horn

Survey Results
resultados de la encuesta
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 449
Do you li ke the im provements on Bu ena V i sta Road?
See photo below.

Answered: 7 Skipped: 2
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do you li ke the improvements on Bu ena Vista Road?
Answered: 7 Skippecl: 2
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Kimley >>> Horn
r nO'dtlS: ~Clfl'CR WI' fl.llU-1
WIE ACCESS ll<TO FER< ST
TI) W;J NT.'J ~' i!G HT
Ol!fT.AN Cf AT IIILL c~r
lii
0 t""
ffi
CD
~ en

Zoom Webinar Attendee Controls
Control de Seminario Web Zoom
Audio Settings:

Change
your audio
settings . You can
also click the
upward arrow (^)
next to change
your speaker.

Question &
Answer:Open the Q&A
window, allowing you to
ask questions. The hosts
can either reply via text in
the Q&A window or
answer your question
live.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 450Kimley>>> Horn
The ho.st Wc:J'Uld lll(-e, 101;1 to unmut,e, y01.,1r
l!fflierophone

Preguntas y discusión abierta
Questions and Open Discussion
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 451Kimley>>> Horn

NEXT STEPS

SIGUENTES PASOS
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 452Kimley>>> Horn

Buena Vista Public Workshop #1 (3/24/2021)
Public Comment / Question
Interested in City direction to address speeding
Parking Issues, negative impacts on property
Drag racing and sideshows / donuts occurring at night. Noise issues Police enforcement lacking on Buena Vista. No response or presence in area.

Buena Vista is a cut through route
Concerned about children's safety at Calevaras School
Need more traffic calming measures in the neighborhood
Support implementation of roundabouts
Are there opportunities for more traffic calming measures that have horizontal deflection? How does the developer pay for these improvements?
What is the timeline for improvements?
What is estimated cost and where do these funds come from the City? Request RRFB at Line Street intersection, speed limit signs for crossing Are speed humps allowed in the City? Other municipalities allow for vertical deflection.

Concerns of vehicles hitting house and limited parking at Thompson / North Street Opportunity for one‐way streets on Thompson & Monterey? Supports roundabouts and effectiveness of plan
Are rumble strips allowed as a traffic calming for crosswalks? Want to preserve on‐street parking as much as possible
Study North Street for speeds
When is the ribbon cutting for North Street?
In favor of TC options presented
Support roundabout improvements
Residents use bike lane for garbage cans, concerns for bike access How would a cyclist cross the railroad crossing at San Benito? Why are there no crosswalks along Calevaras School by orchard? Area is used to pick up students Why is no parking allowed along North Street?
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 453

D. PUBLIC WORKSHOP #2 MATERIALS AND COMMUNITY COMMENTS
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 454
Kimley >>>Horn

City of Hollister |Ciudad de Hollister
Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming Meeting #2
Reunión para calmar el tráfico en Buena Vista Road #2
Por favor, únase a nosotros para la segun-
da reunión virtual para hablar de calmar
el tráfico en la Buena Vista Road. La
reunión hablará sobre las condiciones ac-
tuales del vecindario y los tratamientos
propuestos en las carreteras que se
pueden colocar para reducir la velocidad
y el tráfico de paso.

We look forward to seeing you there!
¡Esperamos verlos allí!
Hosted by the City of Hollister & Kimley-Horn
Alojado por la Ciudad de Hollister y Kimley-Horn
Fecha: Miércoles, 14 de julio de 2021
Hora: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM
Please join us for the second virtual
meeting to discuss traffic calming on
Buena Vista Road. The meeting will
discuss the current neighborhood condi-
tions and proposed roadway treatments
that may be placed to reduce vehicle
speed and cut-through traffic.

Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2021
Time: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM
For more information contact:
[email protected]
[email protected]
Para más información contacte:
(831) 636 - 4340x1226
(831) 636 - 4340x1218
L E T ’S

C
A
L M

T
R
A
F
F
I C!
LL EE TT ’SS CC AA LL MM TT RR AA FF FF II CC !!
¡C A L M E M O S E L T R Á F I CO!
Click the link below to join the meeting:

Haga clic en el enlace de abajo para unirse a la reunión:
https://kimley-horn.zoom.us/w/95634341938
We want your input! Scan the QR code
below to complete a questionnaire about
the proposed improvements.
¡Queremos tu opinión! Escanee el coefici-
ente QR a continuación para completar un
cuestionario sobre las mejoras propuestas
(English)(Español)
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 455Ki~,___•_.,_.'___,

English or Español
English Survey Link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BuenaVistaENG2 Encuesta en Español Enlace: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BuenaVistaESP2 G.2.a
Packet Pg. 456

The following survey outlines the existing travel conditions and proposed traffic calming measures for Buena Vista Road. City staff intends to take these recommendations with your input to City Council for approval and implementation.

Your feedback will be presented at the City Council meeting and we encourage you to attend. The date of the City Council meeting is to be determined.

Thank you for participating in our survey. Your feedback is important.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 457

Traffic Data Collection Findings
Daily Volumes
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 458
# Roadway Segment Direction Cumulative Cumulative Increase in Plus Project Volume
EB 3,490 4 ,010 15%
1 Buena Vista West of Miller Road WB 2 ,1 90 3 ,010 37% Road Total 5,680 7 ,020 24%
Between Mil le r Road EB 3 ,270 3 ,640 11%
2 Buena Vista and Westside WB 2,510 3 ,150 25% Road Boulevard T otal 5,780 6 ,790 17% EB 2 ,710 2 ,840 5%
3 Buena Vista East of Westside WB 2,180 2 ,390 10% Road Bou levard Total 4,890 5 ,230 7%
NB 450 1,400 211%
4 Miller Road South of Buena V rsta SB 860 1,420 65%
Total 1,310 2,820 115%
NB 1,490 1,920 29%
5 Westside South of Buena Vista SB 1,690 1,930 14% Boulevard T otal 3,180 3,850 ·21%

Traffic Data Collection Findings
Weekday Average Daily Traffic
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 459

Traffic Data Collection Findings
Average Speed and 85th Percentile Speed
Speed limits are determined based on the 85th percentile speeds and based on the data, the current 25/30 mph speed limit would have to be increased to 40/45 mph for enforcement purposes. Instead, if traffic calming measures are implemented, the 85th percentile speed is expected to be lower and the speed limit will remain at 25/30 mph.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 460

Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

1. Do you like the Roundabout at Gonzales Drive? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 461
1-u
>-0 z
~
III
0 0
PROPOSED 60' ICO MINI ROUN0Af30LrT
(SEE ALTERNATI\.E STOP CONTROL

INTERSECTI ON LAYOU T)
I I
INTE RIV. lM PROvEMENT: STR IPING AND SPE:E:0 CUSl-ll ON UL Tl MATE l),lf>ROVEMENT: ROUNDABOUT AT INTE RS ECTI ON COt>.F"ORM TO PROPOSED
BUENA \JISTA CROSS -SECTION
I,!
111111111
111111111
............
/'"':,"
TR IPtE FOUR 0::

CROSSWALK 0::
j
~

Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

2. Do you like the Roundabout at Westside Blvd? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 462
0 0
<;ON FOR M TO

PROPOSED

BU ENA VISTA
CR0$S-$ECTI ON
\\
I lERI . IMPRDV DA ENT: A LL l'IAY STO A T 11'\TE RS ECl HJ:N l!L llMA TE IPl'PROVE!.l E T: ROU D/!tBO LI T A T I TE RS ECll<»J PROPOS ED BO ' ICD MINI ROUNDABOU T.
(S EE AU ER ATl \lE STO CON T OL
I ITRS ECll LAYOlJ D
CO NFOR M TO P ROPOSED ~

BU ENA VIS TA CROSS-SECTI ON
3" RA ISED SP EEO CUS HI O¾-J Vl lll-l
WHEEL CAPS FOfi EM ERG ENICY

VEHI CLE S

BU ENA V ISTA
llrlllllllH /
111111;,1'?
z
...I
~
(/)
5 Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

3. Do you like the improvements at Beresini Lane? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 463
0 0
LANE TRAl<S,n:,; AT
35 MPH QE51['.N SF'Em
[ND I t
UN[
;;;
fil
CII'
LU
al

Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

4. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 464
0 0
/
3~ RAISED SP Ee:D CUS HI ON VIHH
'AHEEL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY
\IEHI CLES
, __ --~ENAVISTA RD ___ _
a:
0 ~ g
Iii

Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

5. Do you like the improvements at Line Street? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 465
0 0
LA
3 ED RAISED ME
A GU LA F<' R
a EACON S {

P E ESTR I

AT CROSS I G
j
-.. .. .. BU ENA Y IST A RD -• "--:~~~====~-:-;~,;-~~~==~=====z===;: F, .. --.. =--=:==--=~=~~=r:J:
11,1111111,1 ~
1011111111 /
Ulf (

TR IP LE FOU R

CROSSWA LK
e
unnur
1111111111
1111111
1111111

Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

6. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 466
0 0
............ /
11111111111 ._/
t;S'J f~ TA IPLE FOUR
,t: CROSSWALK u -~ I

Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

7. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 467
0 0
PROVIDE CENlER LEFT TURN

LANE ACCESS INTO FE RN ST

TO MAIN TAIN SIGHT
DISTA NCE AT Hill CREST

CONFORM TO BU ENA VISTA
ROAD TRACK JJ9 STRIPl~G
tM PROVD .!ENT PLAN

Traffic Calming Measure Concepts
Comment (optional)

8. Do you like the improvements on Buena Vista Road? See photo below.

Yes
No
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 468
0 0
CQt,.•FORM TO BUENA VI STA
ROAD TRACI( 339 STRIPING
IMPRO\.'EMENT PLAN
t
J

Calma del tráfico de Buena Vista
Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming
July 14, 2021
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 469Kim/ey >»Horn

Zoom Webinar Attendee Controls
Audio Settings:

Change
your audio
settings. You can
also click the
upward arrow (^)
next to change
your speaker.

Question &
Answer:Open the Q&A
window, allowing you to
ask questions. The hosts
can either reply via text in
the Q&A window or
answer your question
live.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 470Kimley>>> Horn
The ~o.,t woqld lll(-e lD-U to umnute, yo1,1r
ml~·rop'Mne.

S ;f!V,1 UUJ,d

Reglas del Compromiso | Rules of Engagement

1.Respect each others’ time

2.Each comment has merit &
deserves to be listened to

3.Respect each others’ points

4.Raise your hand if you want
to speak

5.No personal comments,
unless they will make
everyone smile

1.Respetar el tiempo de todos

2.Cada comentario tiene
mérito y & merece ser
escuchado

3.Respeten los puntos de
todos

4.Levante su mano si desea
hablar

5.No haga comentarios
personales, a menos que
hagan todos sonreír
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 471Kimley>>> Horn

Diario/Agenda
•Survey Results
•Updated Traffic Calming
Concepts
•Questions and Open Discussion
•Next Steps…
•Resultados de la encuesta
•Conceptos actualizados para
calmar el tráfico
•Preguntas y discusión abierta
•Próximos pasos…
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 472Kimley>>> Horn

Public Comment Summary from Last Workshop
•Community supports measures to address speeding
•Consider impacts to on-street parking
•Improve visibility and safety for pedestrians
•Are speed humps a feasible option? Emergency access?
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 473Kimley>>> Horn

Sa
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
Buena Vista Road Overview Map
Mi
l
l
e
r

R
d
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
No
r
t
h
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
Downtown
Hollister
Calaveras
Elementary
School
Be
r
e
s
i
n
i

L
n
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 474

Resultados de la encuesta
Survey Results
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 475Kimley>>> Horn

Resultados de la encuesta
Survey Results
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 476
Ql. Do you ~ike he Traff~c C~rcle al Go z ales D ·ive?
0 0 0
Kimley >>> Horn
µ
i5
2:
le( n:: m
MClf'OSEO 80' ICD I 1 ROU DAflO T.
{ EE AL TE A TM: T CO NTRO L
IJ',, TE'R ECll LA YO T)

Resultados de la encuesta
Survey Results
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 477
.:. 2 Do ·O like the· n11prove e 1ts a Beresi 1~ Lane?
11:S cd:

I_
30 o ·
Kimley >>> Horn

Resultados de la encuesta
Survey Results
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 478
Q3 Do you like the bike lane a B 1ena Vista Road?
0 -/4
n
~-
0 ....I

Resultados de la encuesta
Survey Results
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 479
Q4 Do yoru ike the im rovements on Bue n a Vis a Road?
ns ere :'J ·
a
Kimle

Resultados de la encuesta
Survey Results
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 480
Q5 Do you like the improvemients on Buena V ista Ro 1ad? Kimley >>> Horn
0% 0 ,2{1 -0

Resultados de la encuesta
Survey Results
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 481
Q6 Do you like the in1provements on Buena Vista Ro ,ad? n:s er:E!d. 2.6 :S .· ~
Kimley

Conceptos actualizados para
calmar el tráfico
Updated Traffic Calming Concepts
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 482Kimley>>> Horn

Cambios en el concepto de calma del tráfico
Traffic Calming Concept Updates
•Enhanced pedestrian crossings and RRFB at Line St
•Added City striping plans from Locust Ave to San Felipe Rd •Identified appropriate on-street parking
•Propose raised speed cushions along Buena Vista
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 483Kimley>>> Horn

•Speed cushions are two
or more raised humps
placed laterally across a
roadway with wheel gaps.
•Wheels gaps enable wide
track vehicles to pass
without vertical deflection
(emergency vehicles)
•Gaps are positioned such
that cars must drive over
the raised pavement at
slower speeds.

Cojín de velocidad
Speed Cushion
•Los amortiguadores de velocidad son dos o más jorobas elevadas colocadas lateralmente a través de una carretera con espacios entre las ruedas. •Los espacios entre las ruedas permiten que los vehículos de vías anchas pasen sin deflexión vertical (vehículos de emergencia) •Los espacios se colocan de manera que los automóviles deban circular sobre el pavimento elevado a velocidades más lentas.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 484Kimley>>> Horn

Benefits
•May have up to 10% reduction in speed
•Minimal impact to on-street parking and bikes
•Minimize fire emergency response times
Drawbacks
•May increase vehicle noise
•Vehicles may try to drive in opposing vehicle lane to avoid vertical deflection Beneficios
•Puede tener una reducción de hasta
un 10% en la velocidad
•Impacto mínimo en el
estacionamiento en la vía y las
bicicletas.
•Minimice los tiempos de respuesta a
emergencias de incendios
Desventajas
•Puede aumentar el ruido del vehículo
•Los vehículos pueden intentar
conducir en el carril opuesto para
evitar la desviación vertical.

Cojín de velocidad
Speed Cushion
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 485Kimley>>> Horn

Design Considerations
•3-to -4-inch speed cushion height
•Asphalt or rubber material
Applications
•Local streets at mid-block locations
•Placed in a series to retain slower vehicle speeds (250 to 500 feet apart) Consideraciones de diseño
•Altura del cojín de velocidad de 3 a 4 pulgadas
•Asfalto o material de caucho
Aplicaciones
•Calles locales en ubicaciones a mitad de cuadra
•Colocados en una serie para retener velocidades más lentas del vehículo (250 a 500 pies de distancia) Cojín de velocidad
Speed Cushion
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 486Kimley>>> Horn

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 487
PL
VARIES
3• RAISED SPEED CUSHION WITH

WHEEL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY
• VEHICLES
I I I
SPEED HUMP :---7-

WARNING SIGN
6' 2' 11'
t
451
I I I

MUTCD STRIPING FOR ADVANCE

SPEED CONTROL WARNING

MAINTAIN EXISTING

ON-STREET PARKING
11' 2' 6' 7'
GRAVEL SHOULDER CLASS et:: TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE et:: CLASS PARKING w w & DRIVEWAY II BIKE LL WESTBOUND EASTBOUND LL II BIKE LL LL LANE => => LANE CD CD
w w a. a.
~ ~
Ul ·--.
\
3 11 SPEED CUSHIO

PROPOSED BUENA VISTA ROAD CROSS-SECTION
PL
5' 5'

DRIVE SIDE

WAY WALK
&
TREES

SX
R
R
Speed Cushion Spacing G.2.a
Packet Pg. 488

BUENA VISTA RD
3" R ISED SPEED CUSH O WITH A IN
WHEEL GAPS FOR EMERGENCY I ·VEHICLES
"-
3'
. ..L
I I I

CREST VERTICAL CURVE
12'
-f I
/ N
6 3 I -~ ... I I
w z
I

MAINTAIN EXISTING

ON-STREET PARKING
I
w z
...J
I
(..)
~
~

Sa
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
Concepto provisional -Cojín de velocidad
Interim Concept – Speed Cushion
Go
n
z
a
l
e
s

D
r
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
No
r
t
h
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
Downtown
Hollister
Calaveras
Elementary
School
Be
r
e
s
i
n
i

L
n
Mirabella
Development
Potential
Speed Cushion
Locations
Li
n
e

S
t
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 489

Sa
n

B
e
n
i
t
o

S
t
4th St
Concepto Ultimate - Mini-Glorietas
Ultimate Concept –Mini Roundabout
Go
n
z
a
l
e
s

D
r
We
s
t
s
i
d
e

B
l
v
d
No
r
t
h
Co
l
l
e
g
e

S
t
Downtown
Hollister
Calaveras
Elementary
School
Be
r
e
s
i
n
i

L
n
Mirabella
Development
Potential
Speed Cushion
Locations
Potential
Roundabout
Locations
Potential RRFB
Pedestrian
Crossing
Li
n
e

S
t
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 490

Programación y próximos pasos
Schedule and Next Steps
Timeline Milestone
Summer –Fall 2021 Complete Engineering Design
Winter 2021 Bid Project for Construction
Winter 2021 –Spring
2022
Construct Project
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 491Kimley>>> Horn

Preguntas y discusión abierta
Questions and Open Discussion
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 492Kimley>>> Horn

Zoom Webinar Attendee Controls
Audio Settings:

Change
your audio
settings. You can
also click the
upward arrow (^)
next to change
your speaker.

Question &
Answer:Open the Q&A
window, allowing you to
ask questions. The hosts
can either reply via text in
the Q&A window or
answer your question
live.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 493Kimley>>> Horn
The ~o.,t woqld lll(-e lD-U to umnute, yo1,1r
ml~·rop'Mne.

S ;f!V,1 UUJ,d

NEXT STEPS

SIGUENTES PASOS
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 494Kimley>>> Horn

¡Cuéntenos sobre su
vecindario!
Tell Us About Your
Neighborhood!
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 495Kimley>>> Horn

Buena Vista Public Workshop #2 (7/14/2021)
Public Comment / Question
Speeding occuring at night and mid‐day, disruptive and noisy Welcome the addition of speed cushions
Why implement roundabouts? How do they affect pedestrians and bikes? Consideration of all way stop control at Raven/North and Fern/North Street intersections? Avid cyclist and walker, Support roundabout improvements Can there be increased police enforcement along Buena Vista during peak hours? Noticed / appreciate increased police enforcement
Add multiple speed limit signs along Buena Vista
What measures can be installed to stop racing / sideshows at night? There is a blind spot approaching hill on North Street with setting sun. Install advance warning sign? Can additional traffic calming measures be installed at Beresini area / City limits? Observe unsafe turns at gas station driveway at North / San Benito. Potential solutions with median? Calaveras School congested for student drop‐off. Are there ways to route congestion? How does traffic calming measures affect traffic diversion in neighborhood? Limited sight distance at the crosswalk at Fern / North Street intersection due to hill.

Consideration for flashing lights at pedestrian crossings What is the implementation schedule for this project?
Currently a temp stop sign setup at Gonzales. Consider advance warning signs.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 496

Engineering & Traffic Survey
)HEUXDU\
City of Hollister, California
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 497

Segment # 2
Street: Buena Vista Road
Limits:Locust Avenue to Miller Road
Direction:E/W
E/O Calaveras School
30 113
40 28-37
72%
2,597

0.62 Collector
January 2012 - June 2017
4 1.24

0.91 Land use is generally residential with one school and attached park on the south side and agricultural on the north side of the roadway.

Two-lane roadway with striped centerline and no all-way stop controlled intersections.

Partial eastbound bike lanes and on-street parking. Sidewalks exist on the south side of the roadway along most of the segment. Segment is straight and flat, with no curves.

Results of attached engineering & traffic survey information support increasing the speed limit to 35 mph. This segment crosses jurisdictional boundaries and is part of a 35 mph corridor.

Yes
Recommended Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of Hollister Public Works:

Title: Vice President, TJKM Transportation Consultants
Speed Limit Change?
Existing Speed Limit: 30 mph
Signed: Chris D. Kinzel, PE
Statewide Average Accident Rate
D. Roadway Conditions
Adjacent Land Use
Roadway Geometrics
Comments
Accident Rate (Acc/MVM)
10 mph Pace
Percent in Pace
B. Traffic Factors
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Length of Segment (mi.)
Street Classification
C. Collision History
Date Range Covered
Total Accidents
85th Percentile (mph)
Factors
A. Prevailing Speed Data
Date /Location of Survey
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
# Speed Data Collected
This survey conforms to Section 627 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code and Section 2B.13 of the California MUTCD and recommends a speed limit appropriate to facilitate the safe and orderly movement of traffic.

SurveyLocation
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 498
Westside Rd
r-=-=-=-_____ _J .. Rd I • Buenq Vista Rd
.5
W 2nd S t
u Centcal Ave
Canal Aly
Cosco C t';
~ Central A\le
B:11
v.

Segment # 3
Street: Buena Vista Road
Limits:Miller Road to Carnoble Drive
Direction:E/W
E/O Canoble Drive
30 154
43 29-38
62%
2,965

0.30 Collector
January 2012 - June 2017
4 2.25

0.91 Land use is a mix of residential and agricultural on the south side and agricultural on the north side of the roadway
Two-lane roadway with striped centerline and no all-way stop controlled intersections.

Partial eastbound bike lanes and on-street parking. Sidewalks exist on the south side of the roadway along most of the segment. Segment is straight and flat, with no curves.

Results of attached engineering & traffic survey information support increasing the speed limit on the overall corridor from Beresini Lane to Locust Avenue to 35 mph. This segment crosses jurisdictional boundaries and is part of that 35 mph corridor.

Yes
Recommended Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of Hollister Public Works:

SurveyLocation
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 499
I
I
I • I p I
I
~ "' I 0
E I .. u I
Centr al Ave u
.s
ici, ., Orµz Ct..,
.. a,: u t;;
~
-
c
0 "' fl
0 -'
c:: ..

I/]
I
I
Buena Vista Rd I
I
I
I
1 -u □ " I ._ .,
;:, ..
-I ~ ft ., "' ..
> " 0
5 I.:)
.c t:S-
,!:! C: :a ,. .,
., 0::
v,-.,
:a;. ..
:!l ..J
~

Segment # 4
Street: Buena Vista Road
Limits:Carnoble Drive to Beresini Lane
Direction:E/W
W/O Ranchito Drive
30 160
43 32-41
69%
3,007

0.30 Collector
January 2012 - June 2017
1 0.55

Partial eastbound bike lanes and on-street parking. Sidewalks exist on the south side of the roadway along most of the segment. Segment is straight and flat, with no curves.

Yes
Recommended Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by The City of Hollister Public Works:

SurveyLocation
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 500
I
I I Bu""'" Vlst.a Rd
....

Q C: c I ~ ....

I i: I-,!!'; 0
~ ,!:' 1i ::, ~ ~
I E' ~ .c ,!::
n :: c
C}
I
I
I
~ ci I
Q I
% .. :c
~ 0
E I ,.
(.l
--..

Ortiz Cl "0
-r:t:: '-'
-.ieto"

Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming After-Study

Attachment B – Buena Vista Road Traffic Calming Plans

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 501
Kimley >>>Horn

5TH STREET
7TH STREET
G
R
A
F
F

R
O
A
D
4TH STREET
M
A
R
G
U
E
R
I
T
E

D
R
I
V
E

CENTRAL AVE

BUENA VISTA RD
SA
N

B
E
N
I
T
O

S
T
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

C
V
-
0 1

J
u
l
y

2 9
,

2 0
2 2

0 9
:
0 0
:
5 1
a
m

\
\
k
i
m
l
e
y
-
h
o
r
n
.
c
o
m
\
c
a
_
p
l
s
1 \
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
0 0
1 C
O
V
E
R
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF

COVER SHEET

CITY OF HOLLISTER

TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
1 VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
CV-01

BUENA VISTA
CIP #C2006
Sheet List Table
Sheet
Number Drawing Number
1 CV-01
2 GN-02
3 L-014
L-025
L-036
L-047
L-058
CD-019
CD-0210
CD-0311
CD-0412
CD-0816
X-01
17 EL-01
18 DT-01
Sheet Title

COVER SHEET

GENERAL NOTES

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS

RRFB PLAN

RRFB DETAILS

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

PROJECT

LOCATION
CD-0513 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CD-0614 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CD-0715 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 502
-7
0 f;
3:

C
u
I
.I
E
'·' u
C
2 u
[
u
C ,,
u
u
u ,,
r
0 8
BMITTAL 90% ~~IEW ONLY
FOR R 2022 JULY
Kimley>>> Horn
WO,
Est 18U

4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

G
N
-
0 2

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
3 7
:
5 0
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
0 0
1 C
O
V
E
R
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF

1. ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF HOLLISTER STREET & SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS STANDARD DETAILS, 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (GREENBOOK), OR 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AS SPECIFIED. IN CASE OF CONFLICTING SPECIFICATIONS OR DETAILS, THE MORE RESTRICTIVE SPECIFICATION AND DETAIL SHALL BE FOLLOWED.

2. TRAFFIC CONTROL MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF THE CA MUTCD.

CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE AN APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. PREPARE AND SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. UPDATE AND RESUBMIT AS NEEDED UNTIL THE PLAN IS APPROVED.

3. COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER POLLUTION CONTROL OUTLINED IN CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.

4. DO NOT APPLY THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING USING HAND CART METHODS. THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPES

WILL BE MEASURED BY THE LINEAR FOOT REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL STRIPES COMPRISING THE DETAIL OR GAPS IN THE STRIPE.

5. PREPARE A LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN TO COVER REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING STRIPING THAT IS SHOWN TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED STRIPING OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF SLURRY SEAL. RESIDUE FROM THE REMOVAL

OF PAINTED OR THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS CONTAINS LEAD FROM THE PAINT OR THERMOPLASTIC. THE AVERAGE LEAD CONCENTRATIONS ARE LESS THAN 1,000 MG/KG TOTAL LEAD AND 5 MG/L SOLUBLE LEAD. THIS RESIDUE:
a. IS A NONHAZARDOUS WASTE
b. DOES NOT CONTAIN HEAVY METALS IN CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE THRESHOLDS ESTABLISHED BY THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE AND 22 CA CODE OF REGS
c. IS NOT REGULATED UNDER THE FEDERAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA), 42 USC§ 6901 ET SEQ. MANAGEMENT OF THIS MATERIAL EXPOSES WORKERS TO HEALTH HAZARDS THAT MUST BE ADDRESSED IN YOUR LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN.

6. PROPOSED FEE IS CONSIDERED TO BE FULL COMPENSATION FOR PERFORMING ALL WORK AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS. NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS WILL BE MADE.

7. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE TO THE CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARDS AND ACCEPTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR. STANDARD PLANS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE CITY'S WEBSITE.

8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH CITY OF HOLLISTER AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED ON ALL INSPECTIONS.

9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE ALL ARRANGEMENTS FOR SITE INSPECTIONS AND ENSURE THAT ALL

CURRENT STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF HOLLISTER ARE FOLLOWED PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK.

10. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LIMITED TO BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. AND 6:00 P.M., MONDAY THRU FRIDAY AND INSPECTION REQUESTS SHALL BE LIMITED TO NORMAL CITY BUSINESS HOURS: 8:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M., MONDAY THRU FRIDAY.

11. TIE OUT ALL MANHOLES, WATER VALVE COVERS, CLEAN OUTS, PULL BOXES, 5G BOXES, AND MONUMENTS, THEN PROVIDE DATA TO THE CITY REPRESENTATIVE 14 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY SURFACE TREATMENT.

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY “GENERAL NOTES” FOR CONSTRUCTION. FOR INSTANCES WHERE THEY CONFLICT WITH THESE KH GENERAL NOTES, THEN THE MORE RESTRICTIVE SHALL APPLY.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND

DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES' SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO DETERMINE EXISTING CONDITIONS.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS THAT MAY AFFECT CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE

GIVEN TO CHANGE ORDERS FOR WHICH THE CITY AND ENGINEER WERE NOT CONTACTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE AFFECTED ITEM.

5. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE

BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK TO HAVE THEM LOCATE THEIR EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL 811 AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF TIME PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION OR ANY EXCAVATION.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAUTION AS THE SITE CONTAINS VARIOUS KNOWN AND UNKNOWN PUBLIC UTILITIES.

8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND RELOCATIONS OF EXISTING

UTILITIES THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADJUSTING EXISTING MANHOLES TO MATCH PROPOSED GRADE.

9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND BONDS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES A COPY OF THE CONTRACT

DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, PROJECT AND CITY SPECIFICATIONS, AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS, COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, AND INSPECTION REPORTS.

11. ALL SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT REQUIRE ENGINEER REVIEW SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THAT ITEM, SO THAT NO LESS THAN 10 BUSINESS DAYS FOR REVIEW AND RESPONSE IS AVAILABLE.

12. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR REQUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS.

13. CONTRACTOR'S BID PRICE SHALL INCLUDE ALL INSPECTION FEES.

14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MATERIALS TESTING AND CERTIFICATION. ALL MATERIALS TESTING

SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY INSPECTOR AND COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN APPROVED INDEPENDENT AGENCY FOR TESTING MATERIALS. CITY SHALL APPROVE THE AGENCY NOMINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR MATERIALS TESTING.

15. ALL COPIES OF MATERIALS TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY AND ENGINEER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY.

16. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SHOW, BY THE STANDARD TESTING PROCEDURES OF THE MATERIALS, THAT THE WORK CONSTRUCTED MEETS THE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND CITY SPECIFICATIONS.

17. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONFINE THEIR ACTIVITIES TO THE WORK AREA. NO ENCROACHMENTS OUTSIDE OF THE WORK AREA WILL BE ALLOWED. ANY DAMAGE RESULTING THEREFROM SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR.

18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, MANHOLES, POLES, GUY WIRES,

VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, COMMUNICATION BOXES/PEDESTALS, AND OTHER FACILITIES TO REMAIN AND SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGES AT NO COST TO THE CITY.

19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY PHYSICAL DAMAGE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: FENCES, WALLS, SIGNS, PAVEMENT, CURBS,

UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, GRASS, TREES, LANDSCAPING, AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER AT NO COST TO THE CITY.

20. SITE SAFETY IS SOLELY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.

21. THESE PLANS DO NOT EXTEND TO OR INCLUDE DESIGNS OR SYSTEMS PERTAINING TO THE SAFETY OF THE CONTRACTOR OR ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THE ENGINEER'S SEAL HEREON DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY SUCH SAFETY SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL REQUIRED SAFETY PROCEDURES AND PROGRAMS.

22. SIGNS RELATED TO SITE OPERATION OR SAFETY ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THESE PLANS.

23. CONTRACTOR STAGING AREA SHALL BE AGREED ON BY THE CITY AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION STORAGE, AND STAGING OPERATIONS AND LOCATIONS.

24. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST EDITION.

25. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND PHASING, AND SHALL CONTACT

THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS, INCLUDING BUILDING OFFICIAL, ENGINEERING INSPECTOR, AND FIRE MARSHAL TO LEARN OF ANY REQUIREMENTS.

26. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARATION, SUBMITTAL, AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF A TRAFFIC

CONTROL PLAN PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, AND THEN THE IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF THE PLAN.

27. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A NEAT AND ACCURATE RECORD OF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ANY DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES FROM THE PLANS.

28. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT PLANS TO THE ENGINEER AND CITY IDENTIFYING ALL DEVIATIONS AND VARIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

TRAFFIC CONTROL SPECIFICATION

1. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY SHALL BE ACCORDING TO SECTION 600 OF THE 2018 GREENBOOK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION AND REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT AMENDMENTS.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR WORK TO BE DONE TWO WEEKS BEFORE STARTING WORK, FOR THE CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS. TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE CALIFORNIA MUTCD, LATEST EDITION.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADEQUACY OF ANY TRAFFIC PLAN USED.

CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE STARTING ANY CONSTRUCTION DETOUR.

4. A SEPARATE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR ANY WORK ON ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK ON THESE STREETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

ALSO SUBMIT SEPARATE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR WORK WITHIN ANY MAJOR INTERSECTIONS, STATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AREAS WHERE SCHOOLS ARE PRESENT AND OTHER CONGESTED AREAS. THE TRAFFIC CONTROL

PLAN SHALL INCLUDE PHASING, EXISTING STRIPING, AND TEMPORARY STRIPING DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND FINISHED PERMANENT STRIPING.

5. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS SHALL BE PREPARED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED C31 CONTRACTOR OR QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR WITH A GENERAL "A" LICENSE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY FULL TIME DEDICATED PERSONNEL WHOSE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY IS TO DO TRAFFIC CONTROL ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS PROHIBITED FROM USING OTHER CREW PERSONNEL TO PERFORM THIS JOB.

6. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING WORK ON A CITY STREET TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THE APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SUCH ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (E.G. FLAG

PERSONS) AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE SAFE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC MOTORISTS, BICYCLISTS, PEDESTRIAN

AND CONSTRUCTION STAKING STAFF THROUGH AND AROUND THE WORK AREA AND PROVIDE MAXIMUM PROTECTION AND SAFETY TO CONSTRUCTION WORKERS.

7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE BARRICADING OF THE WORK AREA AND CONTROLLING OF TRAFFIC NEAR THE PROJECT AS SPECIFIED IN SUB SECTION 600 OF THE 2018 GREENBOOK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.

8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESERVING ORIGINAL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING STRIPING OBLITERATED BY THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING SUFFICIENT STRIPING CONTROL POINTS TO BE ABLE TO RESTORE LANE DIMENSIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

INSTALL AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY OVERLAY YELLOW OR WHITE MARKERS, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WHERE STRIPING CANNOT BE RESTORED BY THE END OF THE WORKDAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL ROADWAY STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS REMOVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION WORK.

9. AT LEAST FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THEIR CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL. THIS SCHEDULE SHALL ALLOW RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES ALONG THE STREETS WHERE THERE IS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO HAVE AMPLE "ON STREET" PARKING (IF PARKING IS ALLOWED) WITHIN A REASONABLE DISTANCE FROM THEIR HOMES OR PLACE OF BUSINESS.

BASED UPON THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES OF THE PROPOSED WORK, AND POST TEMPORARY "NO PARKING" SIGNS AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF IMPLEMENTING ANY PARKING RESTRICTIONS. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF "DOOR KNOCKER" NOTICES AND MUST BE IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SAMPLE OF THE "NO PARKING" SIGN AND "DOOR KNOCKER" NOTICES TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL.

10. THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO OBSERVE THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS IN USE AND TO MAKE CHANGES AS FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT. ANY CHANGES WILL SUPERSEDE THE PLANS AND WILL BE DONE SOLELY AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE WITH RECOLOGY, SAN BENITO COUNTY TO MAINTAIN TRASH PICK-UP SERVICES FOR THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE TRANSIT AGENCIES OF ANY DELAYS TO THEIR BUSES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL SCHOOLS (PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE) WHERE THE WORK MAY AFFECT SCHOOL OPERATIONS.

12. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THE TRAFFIC CONTROL ESTIMATE FORM. PAYMENT WILL BE ADJUSTED BASED ON THE STREETS COMPLETED FROM THIS LIST.

13. FULL COMPENSATION FOR FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, AND INCIDENTALS, AND ALL

NECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROL AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY IS CONSIDERED INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT PRICE PAID FOR "PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND SAFETY (TRAFFIC CONTROL)" AND NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED.

GENERAL NOTES
2 GN-02

GENERAL NOTESKIMLEY-HORN GENERAL NOTES
BC
LG
LF
R
EP
C
TC
PL
LEGEND

BEGIN CURVE OF EXISTING CURB RETURN RADIUS

LIP OF GUTTER

LINEAR FOOT
RADIUS

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

CENTER LINE

TOP OF CURB

PROPERTY LINE
L
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 503
7 0
C
°' V
D
~
' GJ
C
Gi
~
u
0 ,-, ,,

,
BMITTAL 90% R~~IEW ONLY
V ® ·~·"''~ FOR 2022
'C
~:,
KnCall before you dig.

JULY
~2
0 >, ,_, ;'""'
~-, :s
1; >> -,, "
;
ml
~ ~
'~,•
Ki
w
68897
OLLISTE~
~ No,
* * ..
r Hometown, California
,~ u>,:, C I VI \o~~ ~ ,t: ~ Est.18U
l'1: or CAL I
l J

Exist CURB &
GUTTER
Exist
CURB &
GUTTER
Exist NATIVE

MATERIALOR

LANDSCAPE
Exist

AGGREGATE
BASE
Exist CURB &
GUTTERExist CURB &
GUTTER Exist NATIVE

MATERIALOR

LANDSCAPE
Exist

AGGREGATE
BASE
Exist CURB &
GUTTERExist NATIVE

MATERIAL
Exist

AGGREGATE
BASE
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

C
D
-
0 1

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
3 8
:
1 2
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
5 0
0 T
Y
P
I
C
A
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF

TYPICAL SECTIONS
3 TX-01
N.T.S.39' MEDIAN WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES
N.T.S.

N.T.S.24'-11' MEDIAN WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES
N.T.S.1NO MEDIAN WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 504
7 0
C
0 T
E
D
,,
C
0 L
0 7
0 ~
0 -c
D
0 "
0 L p
D
0 0
u

::::> (D (D
w w (L (L
0:: 0:: f-f-

CJ) CJ)
Exist TC
12'
Exist PARKING
5'-6' 7'

CLASS PARKING

II BIKE
LANE
5' 5'
Exist Exist

DRIVEWAY SIDEWALK
&
TREES
TC PL
5' 5'

DRIVE SIDE

WAY WALK
&
TREES
Exist TC
5' '
Exist

SIDEWALK
PL TC
5'
Exist SECTION
16'
Exist PARKING
7'
15'
Exist TRAVEL LANE

WESTBOUND
~
I
61'
53'-61'
12' 6'
Exist TRAVEL Exist

LANE CLASS II

EASTBOUND BIKE
LANE
5'-6' 2' 10.5-11' 9' f--------1-------'------i--------i 10.5-11' 2' SIDE
WALK
PARKING CLASS ffi TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE 0:: w
-\
Kimley>>> Horn
II BIKE l;: WESTBOUND CENTER
LANE ffi TURN LANE
w (L
~
CJ)
EASTBOUND c...
c...
::::>
(D
w (L
0:: f-
CJ)
Exist TC
5' 16' 15'
~
I
61'
12· 6'
Exist Exist PARKING Exist TRAVEL LANE Exist TRAVEL Exist

SIDEWALK
PL TC
5' 7'

SIDE PARKING
WALK
-I
Exist TC
12' 5' 5'
Exist PARKING Exist Exist

DRIVEWAY SIDEWALK
&
TREES
TC PL
5'-6' 7' 5' 5'

CLASS PARKING DRIVE SIDE

II BIKE WAY WALK
LANE &
TREES

WESTBOUND
5'-6' 2' 10.5-11'
CLASS 0:: TRAVEL LANE w
II BIKE c... WESTBOUND c...

LANE ::::> (D
w (L
0:: f-
CJ)
Exist SECTION

LANE CLASS II

EASTBOUND BIKE
53'-63'
4' -11'
MEDIAN
CENTER

TURN LANE
LANE

10.5-11' 2'
TRAVEL LANE 0:: w
EASTBOUND c...
c...
::::>
(D
w (L
i!:

CJ)
Exist TC
12· 5' 5'
Exist PARKING Exist Exist

DRIVEWAY SIDEWALK
Exist SECTION
&
TREES
TC PL
5'-6' 7' 5' 5'

CLASS PARKING DRIVE SIDE

II BIKE WAY WALK
LANE &
TREES

BUENA VISTA RD

BUENA VISTA RD
BE
R
E
S
I
N
I
LN
A
G
U
I
R
R
E
D
R
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

S
S
-
0 1

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
3 8
:
5 4
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
2 0
0 L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

B
E
L
O
W

L
E
F
T
4 L-01
NORTH

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

A
B
O
V
E

R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 2
NOTES

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL USA AT LEAST 2 DAYS BEFORE STARTING

CONSTRUCTION FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES

TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT

AREA, INCLUDING BOTH THOSE SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN A MINIMUM OF 14 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT START WORK WITHOUT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN APPROVED BY THE CITY.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE AND

SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY INSPECTOR IF ANY ARE IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE WORK.

4. REMOVE BY GRINDING ALL EXISTING THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING AND

MARKINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF SLURRY SEAL PRIOR TO SLURRY SEAL APPLICATION.

5. ALL STRIPING AND MARKINGS CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED BY GRINDING.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT IN PLACE ALL EXISTING PAINT OR

THERMOPLASTIC OUTSIDE OF PROJECT LIMITS, OR LIMITS OF PROPOSED STRIPING AS SHOWN ON STRIPING SHEETS.

7. POSTED SPEED WITHIN LIMITS OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE 25 MPH.

REPLACE ALL CONFLICTING SPEED LIMIT SIGNS WITH 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGN.

8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, LANE WIDTHS ARE TO CENTER OF STRIPE OR FACE OF CURB.

9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN.

HMA PAVEMENT (12" DEPTH)

PCC SIDEWALK
SAWCUT
LEGEND

BASE FAILURE REPAIR

CONSTRUCTION AND STRIPING NOTES

SIGNING NOTES
INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24D.

INSTALL 12" WHITE LIMIT LINE (STOP LINE) PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24E. LIMIT LINE SHALL BE SET BACK 4' FROM EDGE OF CROSSWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.

INSTALL SPEED CUSHION. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL BIKE LANE ARROW AND BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL YELLOW STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED PER PLAN.

INSTALL TYPE IV ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL TYPE VII ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL GREEN CONFLICT STRIPING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL A1-8 CURB PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A87A.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED AT 10' ON CENTER.

INSTALL 12' WIDE YELLOW TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 12' WIDE WHITE TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 11' WIDE YELLOW BASIC CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARD PLAN A-10.

INSTALL MEDIAN. SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER
CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL DETAIL NUMBER "XX" PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS RSP A20A TO A20D, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INSTALL NEW SIGN AND POST.

EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 505
c,
"' "
D
C
0 0
" 0
C_)
0 D
C c,
D
0 Cl)
'
-
58'
N
87'
'
-
"' 0
"in
0 \ __ !~!~ 2
4 LF "'---CD
L
•ll C
£c
'.' G "'-2T
LF
.ci' ® what's below. ~ ~ KnoCall before you dig. _, ,-, u .-_, ·-.,.. ''->::::
-"'~ J::::.'::'
7' PARKING
5' BIKE LANE
41' 27'
90% R~~IEW ONLY
FOR 2022 JULY

BMITTAL
719
g
0 0 + 0
ci.:

CD
10 00
167'
719 LF 39
719 LF
2' BIKE BUFFER
11+00
7'
EAL LIMITS TYPE II SLURRY S (TYP.)
t-
-----------
A W17-1 "7
Kimley >>> Horn
1 00' TAPER
EAL LIMITS TYPE II SLURRY S (TYP.)
BIKE LANE ~--N
Beg
----L.() --------
~
13+00 "BVA"t-1 =LI_N_E -l --
14+00 16+0 1 s -!00
~
~
<D
Beg BIKE LANE
2' BIKE BUFFER
445'
W17-1
------------1 --------------------------
"BVA" LINE ----. - I
---------- -.,..
---I --------------------------
720'
erowo, a
Es l. 1812
A W17-1 "7
172'
5' BIKE LANE
-----------
17+00
t-
-------
7 , PARKING
6' BIKE LANE
66 \ I 36 LF 39 I _J ---
36 LF 39
1 30' 36' 30'
GRAPHIC SCALE ..

I
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
~
~
-l .
~
~
""?
0 35'
..

I
f7ZZZZa
( ( I (
□
□
□ □
□
□ □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ □ □
@
( I ( ( l(l(l(I

RA
N
C
H
I
T
O
DR

BUENA VISTA RD
WI
L
L
O
W
DR
V
I
S
T
A
VI
E
W

L
N
SEE SHEET CD-01 FOR DETAILS SEE SHEET CD-01 FOR DETAILS BR
A
N
D
Y
CT
G
O
N
Z
A
L
E
Z
DR
N

G
O
N
Z
A
L
E
Z
D
R

BUENA VISTA RD
SEE SHEET CD-01

FOR DETAILS

SEE SHEET
CD-01 FOR

DETAILS
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

S
S
-
0 2

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
3 9
:
1 1
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
2 0
0 L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

B
E
L
O
W

L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 1
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

A
B
O
V
E

R
I
G
H
T
5 L-02
NORTH
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 3

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN
NOTES

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL USA AT LEAST 2 DAYS BEFORE STARTING

CONSTRUCTION FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES

TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT

AREA, INCLUDING BOTH THOSE SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN A MINIMUM OF 14 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT START WORK WITHOUT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN APPROVED BY THE CITY.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE AND

SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY INSPECTOR IF ANY ARE IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE WORK.

4. REMOVE BY GRINDING ALL EXISTING THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING AND

MARKINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF SLURRY SEAL PRIOR TO SLURRY SEAL APPLICATION.

5. ALL STRIPING AND MARKINGS CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED BY GRINDING.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT IN PLACE ALL EXISTING PAINT OR

THERMOPLASTIC OUTSIDE OF PROJECT LIMITS, OR LIMITS OF PROPOSED STRIPING AS SHOWN ON STRIPING SHEETS.

7. POSTED SPEED WITHIN LIMITS OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE 25 MPH.

REPLACE ALL CONFLICTING SPEED LIMIT SIGNS WITH 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGN.

8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, LANE WIDTHS ARE TO CENTER OF STRIPE OR FACE OF CURB.

9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN.

HMA PAVEMENT (12" DEPTH)

PCC SIDEWALK
SAWCUT
LEGEND

BASE FAILURE REPAIR

CONSTRUCTION AND STRIPING NOTES

SIGNING NOTES
INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24D.

INSTALL 12" WHITE LIMIT LINE (STOP LINE) PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24E. LIMIT LINE SHALL BE SET BACK 4' FROM EDGE OF CROSSWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.

INSTALL SPEED CUSHION. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL BIKE LANE ARROW AND BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL YELLOW STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED PER PLAN.

INSTALL TYPE IV ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL TYPE VII ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL GREEN CONFLICT STRIPING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL A1-8 CURB PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A87A.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED AT 10' ON CENTER.

INSTALL 12' WIDE YELLOW TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 12' WIDE WHITE TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 11' WIDE YELLOW BASIC CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARD PLAN A-10.

INSTALL MEDIAN. SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER
CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL DETAIL NUMBER "XX" PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS RSP A20A TO A20D, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INSTALL NEW SIGN AND POST.

EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 506
c,
v
C
0 0
C_)
C c,
0 v
0 Cl)
'

4.5' BIKE LANE
____ [:.~KE ~UFFER_
-----
134
7' PARKING
5' BIKE LANE
134' 20' 40'

TYPE II SLURRY SEAL LIMITS
834 LF 39
BIKE LANE\
(TYP.)
21'
BC
30+00
R18'
2' BIKE BUFFER
~W17-1

TYPE II SLURRY SEAL LIMITS
(TYP.)
s· BIKE LANE I r8J 216 LF 22
---l ------~='_: _____ _
31+00 --t-----'::"'"---l ----~1-----
32+00
R18'
5' BIKE LANE
191'
.
••
20' 40' 23'
2' BIKE BUFFER
33+00
R18'
"BVA" LINE -;.... 34+oo - I ------i-
-----

PARKING

BIKE LANE
163'
5' BIKE LANE
R18'
30'
2' BIKE
~
I
w
_J co
0 z
0:::
::::
-"'~
L.o
90% SUBMITTAL

FOR REVIEW ONLY
JULY 2022
"BVA" LINE I-'~~--
41+00
,----
' --------------1
575'
Kimley >>> Horn
--43+00 "' ---
RS'
44+00~ rn
R18'
t-
□
~ W1~-1 1
J 6'
28' 39' 11' 147' 30' 40' 30' 73'
•

GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
/
I
13'
80 !
I 1 " I
f7ZZZZa
fflflflflflflff
□
□
□ □
□
□ □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ □ □

M
I
L
L
E
R
RD
N

M
I
L
L
E
R

R
D

BUENA VISTA RD
SEE SHEET CD-03 FOR DETAILS SEE SHEET CD-03 FOR DETAILS M
A
R
I
L
L
E

L
N

CALAVERAS ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL CALAVERAS PARK

BUENA VISTA RD
SEE SHEET CD-04 FOR DETAILS
SEE SHEET CD-05 FOR DETAILS
SEE SHEET CD-05 FOR DETAILS
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

S
S
-
0 3

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
3 9
:
2 8
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
2 0
0 L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF6
L-03
NORTH
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

B
E
L
O
W

L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 2
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

A
B
O
V
E

R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 4

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN
NOTES

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL USA AT LEAST 2 DAYS BEFORE STARTING

CONSTRUCTION FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES

TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT

AREA, INCLUDING BOTH THOSE SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN A MINIMUM OF 14 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT START WORK WITHOUT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN APPROVED BY THE CITY.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE AND

SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY INSPECTOR IF ANY ARE IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE WORK.

4. REMOVE BY GRINDING ALL EXISTING THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING AND

MARKINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF SLURRY SEAL PRIOR TO SLURRY SEAL APPLICATION.

5. ALL STRIPING AND MARKINGS CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED BY GRINDING.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT IN PLACE ALL EXISTING PAINT OR

THERMOPLASTIC OUTSIDE OF PROJECT LIMITS, OR LIMITS OF PROPOSED STRIPING AS SHOWN ON STRIPING SHEETS.

7. POSTED SPEED WITHIN LIMITS OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE 25 MPH.

REPLACE ALL CONFLICTING SPEED LIMIT SIGNS WITH 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGN.

8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, LANE WIDTHS ARE TO CENTER OF STRIPE OR FACE OF CURB.

9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN.

HMA PAVEMENT (12" DEPTH)

PCC SIDEWALK
SAWCUT
LEGEND

BASE FAILURE REPAIR

CONSTRUCTION AND STRIPING NOTES

SIGNING NOTES
INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24D.

INSTALL 12" WHITE LIMIT LINE (STOP LINE) PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24E. LIMIT LINE SHALL BE SET BACK 4' FROM EDGE OF CROSSWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.

INSTALL SPEED CUSHION. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL BIKE LANE ARROW AND BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL YELLOW STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED PER PLAN.

INSTALL TYPE IV ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL TYPE VII ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL GREEN CONFLICT STRIPING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL A1-8 CURB PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A87A.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED AT 10' ON CENTER.

INSTALL 12' WIDE YELLOW TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 12' WIDE WHITE TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 11' WIDE YELLOW BASIC CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARD PLAN A-10.

INSTALL MEDIAN. SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER
CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL DETAIL NUMBER "XX" PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS RSP A20A TO A20D, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INSTALL NEW SIGN AND POST.

EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 507
c,
I
87' 171' TAPER 30' 40' 30' 405' 7' :-----------1--------::,--------------------t----'--'----------t-~------'_:_-+-.:....:.._-+---------------------------_.:_--------=---'---------"'::...=_'-----------__:_------j 1-~----------------------~ 206' v
C
0 48+00
-----I +----t-
0 C_)
C c,
0 v
0 Cl)
'
C n
--'--- ::::
-"'~
L.o
23'
100±
W17-1
244'
40' 6' 30'
90% SUBMITTAL

FOR REVIEW ONLY
JULY 2022
8'
70'

BIKE BUFFER
VARIES
V
13'
BC
30' 40'
60+00
30'
5' BIKE LANE l
22 620 LF
---------
2' BIKE BUFFER
61+00 62+00

TYPE II SLURRY SEAL LIMITS
(TYP.)
2' BIKE BUFFER
618'

TYPE II SLURRY SEAL LIMITS
(TYP.)
~W17-1
•
63+00 64+00 131
IIEl _ _,,.__ t----R-18-, --, "BVA" LINE t-------+-I --- 321 LF
324'
w17 _1 ~ 5' BIKE LANE "'7 7' PARKING
Kimley >>> Horn
~
H
5' 24' 6' 420'
w17-1
65+00
IIEl
2' BIKE BUFFER
66+00
"' d
"' d
----------,~ PARKING 7 --
5' BIKE LANE
8'

GRAPHIC SCALE
i i
( IN FEET )
l inch = 40 ft.
80 !
I 1 " I
f7ZZZZa
fflflflflflflff
□
□
□ □
□
□ □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ □ □

W
E
S
T
S
I
D
E
B
L
V
D
WE
S
T
S
I
D
E

R
D
L
I
N
E

S
T

BUENA VISTA RD
V
I
S
T
A

L
N
SEE SHEET CD-02

FOR DETAILS
SEE SHEET CD-02 FOR DETAILS
SEE SHEET CD-06 FOR DETAILS
AC
A
C
I
A

C
T
L
O
C
U
S
T

A
V
E

IOOF CEMETERY
A
L
M
O
N
D

C
T
SEE SHEET CD-02 FOR DETAILSSEE SHEET CD-07 FOR DETAILS
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

S
S
-
0 4

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
3 9
:
4 5
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
2 0
0 L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF7
L-04
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

B
E
L
O
W

L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 3
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

A
B
O
V
E

R
I
G
H
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 5
NORTH

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN
NOTES

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL USA AT LEAST 2 DAYS BEFORE STARTING

CONSTRUCTION FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES

TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT

AREA, INCLUDING BOTH THOSE SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN A MINIMUM OF 14 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT START WORK WITHOUT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN APPROVED BY THE CITY.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE AND

SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY INSPECTOR IF ANY ARE IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE WORK.

4. REMOVE BY GRINDING ALL EXISTING THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING AND

MARKINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF SLURRY SEAL PRIOR TO SLURRY SEAL APPLICATION.

5. ALL STRIPING AND MARKINGS CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED BY GRINDING.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT IN PLACE ALL EXISTING PAINT OR

THERMOPLASTIC OUTSIDE OF PROJECT LIMITS, OR LIMITS OF PROPOSED STRIPING AS SHOWN ON STRIPING SHEETS.

7. POSTED SPEED WITHIN LIMITS OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE 25 MPH.

REPLACE ALL CONFLICTING SPEED LIMIT SIGNS WITH 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGN.

8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, LANE WIDTHS ARE TO CENTER OF STRIPE OR FACE OF CURB.

9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN.

HMA PAVEMENT (12" DEPTH)

PCC SIDEWALK
SAWCUT
LEGEND

BASE FAILURE REPAIR

CONSTRUCTION AND STRIPING NOTES

SIGNING NOTES
INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24D.

INSTALL 12" WHITE LIMIT LINE (STOP LINE) PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24E. LIMIT LINE SHALL BE SET BACK 4' FROM EDGE OF CROSSWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.

INSTALL SPEED CUSHION. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL BIKE LANE ARROW AND BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL YELLOW STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED PER PLAN.

INSTALL TYPE IV ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL TYPE VII ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL GREEN CONFLICT STRIPING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL A1-8 CURB PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A87A.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED AT 10' ON CENTER.

INSTALL 12' WIDE YELLOW TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 12' WIDE WHITE TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 11' WIDE YELLOW BASIC CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARD PLAN A-10.

INSTALL MEDIAN. SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL DETAIL NUMBER "XX" PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS RSP A20A TO A20D, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INSTALL NEW SIGN AND POST.

EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 G.2.a
Packet Pg. 508
c,
1 142' 18' 64' 15' 18' 74' 85' 66'
v
C
0 0
C_)
C c,
0 v
0 Cl)
'
142 LF
~7+00
~ -l ----....,
d -
42'
85'
5' BIKE LAN
8' PARKING
100'
BC
77' TAPER
57'
18'
BC BC
62' 31'
46' 27'
----------,
7 00

BUENA VISTA RD
R5'
78+o(
R18i
C n
--'--- ::::
-"'~
L.o
9' 20'
90% SUBMITTAL

FOR REVIEW ONLY
JULY 2022
!I
40' 20' 12'
w17-1
5' BIKE LANE
W17-1
,.
,
19' 58'
Aw17-1 v"
....., ______ _
-----~-
7'
2' BIKE
BUFFER
167 LF
166 LF
169'
5' BIKE LANE
7' PARKING

TYPE II SLURRY SEAL LIMITS
(TYP.)
30' 39' 20' 15'
• .,.
•
355'
2' BIKE BUFFER
7' PARKING
6' BIKE LANE
81+00
-I R18'
6 LF 2 6' BIKE LANE
1 47 LF
426'
Kimley >>> Horn
49' 133' TAPER 64' I 71' 45' 57' 7' I
1------1-~-----------------=3◄0,-, -------3"'"0-,------i---------1 •

BIKE BUFFER
183 LF
7'
168'

TYPE II SLURRY SEAL LIMITS
(TYP.)
1 BC
12'
I
30' --
30' 38' 32'
7' PARKING
6' BIKE LANE
W17-1
2' BIKE
~UFFER

GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
so
!
I 1 " I
f7ZZZZa
fflflflflflflff
□
□
□ □
□
□ □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ □ @

BUENA VI
S
T
A

R
D
FE
R
N

S
T

BUENA VISTA RD
RA
V
E
N

S
T
SA
N

F
E
L
I
P
E

R
D
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

S
S
-
0 5

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
4 0
:
0 0
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
2 0
0 L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF8
L-05
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

B
E
L
O
W

L
E
F
T
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

S
H
E
E
T

L
-
0 4
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E

S
E
E

A
B
O
V
E

R
I
G
H
T
NORTH

LAYOUT AND STRIPING PLAN
NOTES

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL USA AT LEAST 2 DAYS BEFORE STARTING

CONSTRUCTION FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES

TO PROTECT ALL UTILITIES WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT

AREA, INCLUDING BOTH THOSE SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN A MINIMUM OF 14 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT START WORK WITHOUT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN APPROVED BY THE CITY.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE AND

SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY INSPECTOR IF ANY ARE IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE WORK.

4. REMOVE BY GRINDING ALL EXISTING THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING AND

MARKINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF SLURRY SEAL PRIOR TO SLURRY SEAL APPLICATION.

5. ALL STRIPING AND MARKINGS CONFLICTING WITH PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED BY GRINDING.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT IN PLACE ALL EXISTING PAINT OR

THERMOPLASTIC OUTSIDE OF PROJECT LIMITS, OR LIMITS OF PROPOSED STRIPING AS SHOWN ON STRIPING SHEETS.

7. POSTED SPEED WITHIN LIMITS OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE 25 MPH.

REPLACE ALL CONFLICTING SPEED LIMIT SIGNS WITH 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT SIGN.

8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, LANE WIDTHS ARE TO CENTER OF STRIPE OR FACE OF CURB.

9. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER THESE PLANS, ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN.

HMA PAVEMENT (12" DEPTH)

PCC SIDEWALK
SAWCUT
LEGEND

BASE FAILURE REPAIR

CONSTRUCTION AND STRIPING NOTES

SIGNING NOTES
INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24D.

INSTALL 12" WHITE LIMIT LINE (STOP LINE) PER CALTRANS STANDARD A24E. LIMIT LINE SHALL BE SET BACK 4' FROM EDGE OF CROSSWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.

INSTALL SPEED CUSHION. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL BIKE LANE ARROW AND BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL YELLOW STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED PER PLAN.

INSTALL TYPE IV ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL TYPE VII ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A.

INSTALL GREEN CONFLICT STRIPING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL A1-8 CURB PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A87A.

INSTALL 6" DIAGONAL WHITE STRIPE AT 45 DEGREES, SPACED AT 10' ON CENTER.

INSTALL 12' WIDE YELLOW TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 12' WIDE WHITE TRIPLE FOUR CROSSWALK PAVEMENT
MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL 11' WIDE YELLOW BASIC CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARD PLAN A-10.

INSTALL MEDIAN. SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET CD-08 FOR DETAILS.

INSTALL CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING PER
CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F.

INSTALL DETAIL NUMBER "XX" PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS RSP A20A TO A20D, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INSTALL NEW SIGN AND POST.

EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
G.2.a
Packet Pg. 509
c,
"' "
D
C
0 0
" 0
C_)
0 D
C c,
D
0 Cl)
'
L
•ll C
£c
'.' G "'-2T
87+00
~
97+00
.ci' ® what's below. ~ ~ KnoCall before you dig. _, ,-, u .-_, ·-.,.. ''->::::
-"'~ J::::.'::'
88+00
A W17-1 "7
98+00 Ba, -III t---
I
)
90% R~~IEW ONLY
FOR 2022 JULY

BMITTAL
--l --
-----!_9+oo

I-------, -----
i
o:i
0,
+ 1€
~
Q
99+00 "BVA" LINE -'--t-1-
100+00
Kimley >>> Horn
91+00
~
A W17-1 "7
101+00 102+00
--
•
A W17-1 "7
9J+oo
103+00
t---
erowo, a
Es l. 1812
--l --
I')
t-94+00
--l --
95+00
' I
104+00 105+00
-
96+00
r---
~ .,:

CJ>
+
LO
0 ~
0: w
105 94
-....

GRAPHIC SCALE
i-=-
( IN FEET )
'h-40ft. 1 me
f7ZZZZa
( ( I (
□
□
□ □
□
□ □
□
□
□
□
□
□
□ □ □
@
( I ( ( l(l(l(I

CA
R
N
O
B
L
E

D
R

BUENA VISTA RD
CA
R
N
O
B
L
E

D
R

BUENA VISTA RD

BUENA VISTA RD
GO
N
A
Z
A
L
E
Z

D
R

BUENA VISTA RD
GO
N
A
Z
A
L
E
Z

D
R
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

CALIFORNIAHOLLISTER
197008178
07/29/2022
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
18 Pl
o
t
t
e
d

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

C
D
-
0 1

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
4 0
:
4 1
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
3 0
0 C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF

CURB RAMP

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
9 CD-01

BUENA VISTA RD & CARNOBLE DR
SW CORNER: RAMP CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

BUENA VISTA RD & CARNOBLE DR
SE CORNER: RAMP CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

BUENA VISTA RD & GONZALEZ DR
SW CORNER: RAMP CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

BUENA VISTA RD & GONZALEZ DR
SE CORNER: RAMP CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
NORTH
NOTES

1. AT LOCATIONS WHERE R/W IS NOT IDENTIFIED, EXISTING BACK OF WALK SHALL BE ASSUMED AS RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS.

2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DEPTHS AND LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY CITY ENGINEER OF ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS.

3. EXISTING SURFACE EQUIPMENT (TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES, BOXES, FIRE HYDRANTS, JOINT UTILITY POLES, etc.) TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

4. PRIOR TO REMOVING EXISTING SIDEWALK, CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY LOCATIONS

OF EXISTING PRIVATE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS THAT MAY BE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY EXISTING IRRIGATION THAT MAY CONFLICT WITH THE WORK.

5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS

THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING THOSE NOT

SPECIFICALLY REFERENCED IN THESE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED TO BE DONE BY OTHERS. OTHER THAN THE TEMPORARY REMOVAL OF LANDSCAPING, DO NOT REMOVE ANY IMPROVEMENTS BEHIND THE BACK OF SIDEWALK.

6. ALL UTILITY PIPES, DUCTS, BOXES, VAULTS, AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

7. SEE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND STRIPING PLAN FOR CORRESPONDING DETAILS.

8. EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB, AND GUTTER REMOVAL LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE LOCATED AT WEAKENED PLANE JOINT OR SCOREMARK.

CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.

9. SAWCUT AND REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION TO A NEAT LINE WITHOUT DAMAGING EXISTING AC OR CONCRETE THAT IS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. ANY DAMAGE TO THE

ADJACENT SURFACE MATERIAL TO REMAIN MUST BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO A CONDITION SATISFACTORY TO THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

10. CONTRACTOR TO MARK OUT LIMITS OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND VERIFY WITH CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.

11. RESTORE LANDSCAPING BEHIND BACK OF SIDEWALK TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITION. AREAS OF GRASS SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SOD. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO PRIVATE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS.

12. ALL AREAS IDENTIFIED WITH NOTE 12 ARE CONFORM AREAS WITH A MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE AND MAXIMUM 5% RUNNING SLOPE.

13. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAYING OUT THOSE CURB RAMPS WHERE

VERTICAL CONTROL IS NOT PROVIDED, AS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AN

ADA-COMPLIANT CURB RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARD PLANS REFERENCED. THAT WORK IS PAID FOR AS LAYOUT CURB RAMP.

14. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH PROPERTY OWNERS. CONTACT PROPERTY OWNER A MINIMUM OF ONE WEEK AHEAD

OF ANY TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE TO PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO DO THE WORK. RESTORE ALL PRIVATE LANDSCAPING AND IMPROVEMENTS TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION STATE AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION.

15. ALL AREAS IDENTIFIED WITH NOTE 15 ARE LANDING AREAS AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 4' X 4' WITH A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.5% IN ALL DIRECTIONS. UP TO 2% MAY BE USED WITH ADVANCE APPROVAL OF ENGINEER.

16. ALL RAMP CONFORMS CAN BE BACKFILLED WITH CLASS II AB AND COLD PATCH, THEN

EXTEND THE COLD PLANE TO INCLUDE LIMITS OF THE CONFORMS

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARD DETAILS A-8-1 AND A-8-2.

INSTALL SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HOLLISTER STANDARD DETAILS A-9-1 AND A-9-2.

INSTALL CURB RAMP PER 2018 CALTRANS STANDARD DETAIL RSP A88A. CURB RAMP CASE NOTED PER PLANS.

LEGEND
HMA PAVEMENT (1.0' DEPTH)

PCC SIDEWALK

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
SAWCUT

VALLEY GUTTER FLOWLINE

DEMOLITION & UTILITY NOTES
EXISTING TO REMAIN.

PROTECT-IN-PLACE.

G.2.a
Packet Pg. 510
c,
v
C
0 ,,
0 C_)
C c,
v
0 Cl)
'
C n
BC
+I
~
l!1
SEE NOTE 12
V
[>
SEE NOTE 15
/
SEE NOTE 12
POLE
ss -r-----.:: 22:-l "---0 -
' c,J::;;c
1 r---. ----------
+I
b
If)
SEE NOTE 12
BC
[>
V
I
V
SEE NOTE 15
SEE NOTE 15

BMITTAL
90% R~~IEW ONLY
FOR 2022 JULY
SEE NOTE 12
[>
O'± 5.

O'± 5.

R=30.0'
[>

7.5% MAX RAMP
A CURB RAMP 3 CASE )
(SEE NOTE 13
R=30.0'

7.5% MAX RAMP

CASE A CURB)RAMP
(SEE NOTE 13
EC
_\ 2.0' \-
MIN
EC
(/)
(/)
(/)
(/)
(/)
(/)
Kimley >>> Horn
R=30.0'

7.5% MAX RAMP

CASE A CURB RAMP
(SEE NOTE 13)
BC
£> V
v
R=30.0'

7.5% MAX RAMP

A CURB RAMP CASE )
(SEE NOTE 13
FH
M
BC
me1owo, cauro
Esl. 1812
EC _l
~f-.J...l...l.-.f...J...J...J../...J.-1.-1.~~::~lj=-f
SEE NOTE 12
o'± 5.
[>
V
SEE NOTE 15
+I
b
l!1
SEE NOTE 12

STREET LIGHT
~1--/-,/..../-,L/-J'-l-/-'-l-l--l-l--l-l-l--l-,I--I-,,._,_, ___ J" z o_
N ::;;c
-If
_l
EC
V
[> \
SEE NOTE 12
SEE NOTE 15
SEE NOTE 12

GRAPHIC SCALE IN
0 2.5 f
I I

WE
S
T
S
I
D
E

B
L
V
D

BUENA VISTA RD
W
E
S
T
S
I
D
E

B
L
V
D

BUENA VISTA RD

BUENA VISTA RD
L
O
C
U
S
T

A
V
E
4637 CHABOT DRIVE, STE 300 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: 925-398-4840
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

BUENA VISTA RD

TRAFFIC CALMING

IMPROVEMENTS

B
y
:

D
o
w
n
i
n
g
,

S
a
r
a
h

S
h
e
e
t

S
e
t
:

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

R
o
a
d

R
e
h
a
b

L
a
y
o
u
t
:

C
D
-
0 2

J
u
l
y

2 8
,

2 0
2 2

0 6
:
4 0
:
4 9
p
m

K
:
\
B
A
Y
_
R
D
W
Y
\
1 9
7 0
0 8
2 3
7 -

H
o
l
l
i
s
t
e
r

B
u
e
n
a

V
i
s
t
a

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

C
a
l
m
i
n
g
\
0 8

C
A
D
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
-
3 0
0 C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
.
d
w
g
®
CL
CL/SD
JP

CHECKED BY

DRAWN BY

AS SHOWNSCALE
DATE

KHA PROJECT
No.REVISIONS DATE BY

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
OF

CURB RAMP

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
10 CD-02

BUENA VISTA RD & WESTSIDE BLVD
SW CORNER: RAMP CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

BUENA VISTA RD & WESTSIDE BLVD
SE CORNER: RAMP CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
NORTH
NOTES