July 6, 2018 Lab ID : SP 1807545
CLS Labs - Data Room Customer : 2-19423
Certification:: I certify that this data package is in compliance with ELAP standards, both technically and for completeness, except for any conditions listed above. Release of the data contained in this data package is authorized by the Laboratory Director or his designee, as verified by the following electronic signature.
KD:DMBDigitial Signature Stamp Y = 03.1
Approved By Kelly A. Dunnahoo, B.S.
Digitally signed by Kelly A. Dunnahoo, B.S.
Title: Laboratory Director
Date: 2018-07-06
July 6, 2018 Lab ID : SP 1807545-001
Customer ID : 2-19423
CLS Labs - Data Room
Sampled On : June 6, 2018-10:40
Sampled By : Not Available
Received On : June 8, 2018-11:10
3249 Fitzgerald Rd.
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Matrix : Water
Description : KB-01-264
Project : 18F0272
This Page is to be Stamped
Sample Result - Radio
Sample Preparation Sample Analysis
Constituent Result ± Error MDA Units MCL/AL
Method Date/ID Method Date/ID
Radio Chemistry
Gross Alpha 14.6 ± 2.99 1.62 pCi/L 15/5 900.0
06/14/18-16:48
2P1806802 900.0
06/15/18-13:36
2A1808552
Total Alpha Radium
(226)
0.082 ± 0.085 0.322 pCi/L 3 903.0
06/09/18-14:00
2P1806724 903.0
06/18/18-17:09
2A1808673
Uranium 15.3 ± 3.22 0.470 pCi/L 20 908.0
06/27/18-20:45
2P1807537 908.0
07/06/18-12:27
2A1809675
Ra 228 0.193 ± 0.668 0.506 pCi/L 2 Ra - 05 06/23/18-15:30 2P1807001 Ra - 05 07/02/18-18:002A1809644
ND=Non-Detected. PQL=Practical Quantitation Limit. * PQL adjusted for dilution.
MDA = Minimum Detectable Activity (Calculated at the 95% confidence level) = Data utilized by DHS to determine matrix interference.
MCL / AL = Maximum Contamination Level / Action Level. Alpha's Action Level of 5 pCi/L is based on the Assigned Value (AV).
AV = Assigned Value(Gross Alpha Result + (0.84 x Error)). CCR Section 64442: Drinking Water Compliance Note: Do the following If Gross Alpha's (AV) exceeds 5 pCi/L run Uranium. If Gross Alpha's (AV) minus Uranium exceeds 5 pCi/L run Radium 226.
Drinking Water Compliance:
Gross Alpha (AV) minus Uranium is less than or equal to 15 pCi/L Uranium is less than or equal to 20 pCi/L
Radium 226 + Radium 228 is less than or equal to 5 pCi/L Note: Samples are held for 3-6 months prior to disposal.
Corporate Offices & Laboratory
853 Corporation Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
TEL: (805)392-2000
Env FAX: (805)525-4172 / Ag FAX: (805)392-2063
CA ELAP Certification No. 1573
Office & Laboratory
2500 Stagecoach Road
Stockton, CA 95215
TEL: (209)942-0182
FAX: (209)942-0423
CA ELAP Certification No. 1563
Office & Laboratory
563 E. Lindo Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
TEL: (530)343-5818
FAX: (530)343-3807
CA ELAP Certification No. 2670
Office & Laboratory
9415 W. Goshen Avenue
Visalia, CA 93291
TEL: (559)734-9473
FAX: (559)734-8435
CA ELAP Certification No. 2810
Office & Laboratory
3442 Empresa Drive, Suite D
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
TEL: (805)783-2940
FAX: (805)783-2912
CA ELAP Certification No. 2775
ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURAL
Analytical Chemists
This Page is to be Stamped
July 6, 2018 Lab ID : SP 1807545
CLS Labs - Data Room Customer : 2-19423
Quality Control - Radio
Constituent Method Date/ID Type Units Conc. QC Data DQO Note Radio
Alpha 900.0 06/15/18:208552AAT CCV cpm 8128 41.1 % 35-47 CCB cpm 0.0400 0.17
Gross Alpha 900.0 06/14/18:206802AAT Blank pCi/L 0.10 3 LCS pCi/L 93.94 80.4 % 75-125
MS pCi/L 93.94 95.8 % 60-140
(SP 1807474-001) MSD pCi/L 93.94 94.8 % 60-140
MSRPD pCi/L 93.94 1.0% ≤30
Alpha 903.0 06/18/18:208673EMV CCV cpm 8126 41.1 % 37-46 CCB cpm 0.0400 0.16
Total Alpha Radium (226) 903.0 06/09/18:206724emv RgBlk pCi/L -0.009 2 LCS pCi/L 24.21 56.1 % 52-107
BS pCi/L 24.20 56.0 % 43-111
BSD pCi/L 24.20 53.2 % 43-111
BSRPD pCi/L 24.20 5.1% ≤35.5
Alpha 908.0 07/06/18:209675AAT CCV cpm 8114 37.3 % 36-45 CCB cpm 0.0400 0.16
Uranium 908.0 06/27/18:207537aat RgBlk pCi/L 0.40 1
LRS pCi/L 26.84 54.6 % 54-105
BS pCi/L 26.84 93.0 % 75-125
BSD pCi/L 26.84 98.9 % 75-125
BSRPD pCi/L 26.84 6.2% ≤20
Beta Ra - 05 07/02/18:209644emv CCV cpm 8481 88.3 % 84-94 CCB cpm 0.4000 0.58
Ra 228 Ra - 05 06/23/18:207001emv RgBlk pCi/L -0.03 3
LRS pCi/L 32.35 73.8 % 65-108
BS pCi/L 32.35 95.0 % 75-125
BSD pCi/L 32.35 93.3 % 75-125
BSRPD pCi/L 32.35 1.8% ≤25
Definition
CCV : Continuing Calibration Verification - Analyzed to verify the instrument calibration is within criteria.
CCB : Continuing Calibration Blank - Analyzed to verify the instrument baseline is within criteria.
Blank : Method Blank - Prepared to verify that the preparation process is not contributing contamination to the samples.
RgBlk : Method Reagent Blank - Prepared to correct for any reagent contributions to sample result.
LCS : Laboratory Control Standard/Sample - Prepared to verify that the preparation process is not affecting analyte recovery.
LRS : Laboratory Recovery Standard - Prepared to establish the batch recovery factor used in result calculations.
MS
: Matrix Spikes - A random sample is spiked with a known amount of analyte. The recoveries are an indication of how that sample matrix affects analyte recovery.
MSD
: Matrix Spike Duplicate of MS/MSD pair - A random sample duplicate is spiked with a known amount of analyted. The recoveries are an indication of how that sample matrix affects analyte recovery.
BS
: Blank Spikes - A blank is spiked with a known amount of analyte. It is prepared to verify that the preparation process is not affecting analyte recovery.
BSD
: Blank Spike Duplicate of BS/BSD pair - A blank duplicate is spiked with a known amount of analyte. It is prepared to verify that the preparation process is not affecting analyte recovery.
MSRPD
: MS/MSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) - The MS relative percent difference is an indication of precision for the preparation and analysis.
BSRPD
: BS/BSD Relative Percent Difference (RPD) - The BS relative percent difference is an indication of precision for the preparation and analysis.
DQO : Data Quality Objective - This is the criteria against which the quality control data is compared.
Corporate Offices & Laboratory
853 Corporation Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
TEL: (805)392-2000
Env FAX: (805)525-4172 / Ag FAX: (805)392-2063
CA ELAP Certification No. 1573
Office & Laboratory
2500 Stagecoach Road
Stockton, CA 95215
TEL: (209)942-0182
FAX: (209)942-0423
CA ELAP Certification No. 1563
Office & Laboratory
563 E. Lindo Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
TEL: (530)343-5818
FAX: (530)343-3807
CA ELAP Certification No. 2670
Office & Laboratory
9415 W. Goshen Avenue
Visalia, CA 93291
TEL: (559)734-9473
FAX: (559)734-8435
CA ELAP Certification No. 2810
Office & Laboratory
3442 Empresa Drive, Suite D
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
TEL: (805)783-2940
FAX: (805)783-2912
CA ELAP Certification No. 2775
ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURAL
Analytical Chemists
FGL Environmental Doc ID: 2D0900157_SOP_17.DOC
Revision Date: 10/09/14 Page: 1 of 1
Condition Upon Receipt (Attach to COC)
Sample Receipt at SP:
1. Number of ice chests/packages received: 1
2. Shipper tracking numbers
3. Were samples received in a chilled condition?
Temps: 5 / / / / / /
4. Surface water (SWTR) bact samples: A sample that has a temperature upon receipt of >10C, whether iced or not, should be flagged unless the time since sample collection has been less than two hours.
5. Do the number of bottles received agree with the
COC?
Yes No N/A
6. Verify sample date, time, sampler Yes No N/A
7. Were the samples received intact? (i.e. no broken
bottles, leaks, etc.)
Yes No
8. Were sample custody seals intact? Yes No N/A
Sample Verification, Labeling and Distribution:
1. Were all requested analyses understood and
acceptable?
Yes No
2. Did bottle labels correspond with the client's ID's? Yes No
3. Were all bottles requiring sample preservation
properly preserved?
[Exception: Oil & Grease, VOA and CrVI verified in lab] Yes No N/A FGL
4. VOAs checked for Headspace? Yes No N/A
5. Were all analyses within holding times at time of
receipt?
Yes No
6. Have rush or project due dates been checked and
accepted?
Yes No N/A
Include a copy of the COC for lab delivery. (Bacti. Inorganics and Radio) Sample Receipt, Login and Verification completed by: Reviewed and Approved By Cynthia T Casarez
Digitally signed by Cynthia T Casarez
Title: Sample Receiving
Date: 06/13/2018-10:47:08
Discrepency Documentation:
Any items above which are "No" or do not meet specifications (i.e. temps) must be resolved.
1. Person Contacted: Phone Number:
Initiated By: Date:
Problem:
Resolution:
2. Person Contacted: Phone Number:
Initiated By: Date:
Problem:
Resolution: (2019423)
CLS Labs
SP 1807545
CTC-06/13/2018-10:47:08
(2019423)
CLS Labs
SP 1807545
CTC-06/13/2018-10:47:08
Laboratory Report
for
CLS Labs
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Attention: CLS Data Reporting
Project Manager
Date of Issue
07/09/2018
EUROFINS EATON
ANALYTICAL, LLC
LXG: Linda Geddes
743191
ORGANICS
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100
Monrovia, California 91016-3629
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
* Accredited in accordance with TNI 2009 and ISO/IEC 17025:2005. * Laboratory certifies that the test results meet all TNI 2009 and ISO/IEC 17025:2005 requirements unless noted under the individual analysis. * Following the cover page are State Certification List, ISO 17025 Accredited Method List, Acknowledgement of Samples Received, Comments, Hits Report, Data Report, QC Summary, QC Report and Regulatory Forms, as applicable. * Test results relate only to the sample(s) tested.
STATE CERTIFICATION LIST
* NELAP/TNI Recognized Accreditation Bodies
State Certification Number State Certification Number
Alabama 41060 Mississippi Certified
Arizona AZ0778 Montana Cert 0035
Arkansas Certified Nebraska Certified
California-MonroviaELAP 2813 Nevada CA000062018
California-Colton- ELAP 2812 New Hampshire * 2959
Colorado Certified New Jersey * CA 008
Connecticut PH-0107 New Mexico Certified
Delaware CA 006 New York * 11320
Florida * E871024 North Carolina 06701
Georgia 947 North Dakota R-009
Guam 18-005R Oregon * CA200003-005
Hawaii Certified Pennsylvania * 68-565
Idaho Certified Puerto Rico Certified
Illinois * 200033 Rhode Island LAO00326
Indiana C-CA-01 South Carolina 87016
Iowa - Asbestos 413 South Dakota Certified
Kansas * E-10268 Tennessee TN02839
Kentucky 90107 Texas * T104704230-17-13
Louisiana * LA180000 Utah (Primary AB) * CA00006
Maine CA0006 Vermont VT0114
Maryland 224 Virginia * 460260
Commonwealth of
Northern Marianas Is. MP0004 Washington C838
Massachusetts M-CA006 EPA Region 5 Certified
Michigan 9906 Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts 10264
ISO 17025 Accredited Method List
SPECIFIC TESTS
METHOD OR
TECHNIQUE USED
Environmental
(Drinking
Water)
Environmental
(Waste
Water)
Water as a
Component of
Food and
Bev/Bev/
Bottled Water
SPECIFIC TESTS
METHOD OR
TECHNIQUE USED
Environmental
(Drinking
Water)
Environmental
(Waste
Water)
Water as a
Component of
Food and Bev/Bev/
Bottled Water
1,4-Dioxane EPA 522 x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.7 x x 2,3,7,8-TCDD Modified EPA 1613B x x Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500-Cr B x Acrylamide In House Method (2440) x x Hormones EPA 539 x x Alkalinity SM 2320B x x x Hydroxide as OH Calc. SM 2330B x x Ammonia EPA 350.1 x x Kjeldahl Nitrogen EPA 351.2 x
Ammonia SM 4500-NH3 H x x Legionella CDC Legionella x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.0 x x x Mercury EPA 245.1 x x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.1 x x Metals EPA 200.7 / 200.8 x x x Asbestos EPA 100.2 x x Microcystin LR ELISA (2360) x x
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as
HCO3 SM 2320B x x x NDMA EPA 521 x x
BOD / CBOD SM 5210B x x NDMA TQ In house method based on EPA 521 (2425) x x
Bromate In House Method (2447) x x Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen EPA 353.2 x x x Carbamates EPA 531.2 x x OCL, Pesticides/PCB EPA 505 x x Carbonate as CO3 SM 2330B x x x Ortho Phosphate EPA 365.1 x x x Carbonyls EPA 556 x x Ortho Phosphate SM 4500P E x
COD EPA 410.4 / SM 5220D x Ortho Phosphorous SM 4500P E x Chloramines SM 4500-CL G x x x
Oxyhalides Disinfection
Byproducts
EPA 317.0 x x
Chlorinated Acids EPA 515.4 x x Perchlorate EPA 331.0 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 555 x x Perchlorate (low and high) EPA 314.0 x x Chlorine Dioxide SM 4500-CLO2 D x x Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids EPA 537 x x Chlorine -Total/Free/
Combined Residual
SM 4500-Cl G x x x pH EPA 150.1 x
Conductivity EPA 120.1 x pH SM 4500-H+B x x x
Conductivity SM 2510B x x x
Phenylurea Pesticides/
Herbicides
In House Method, based on EPA
532 (2448) x x
Corrosivity (Langelier Index) SM 2330B x x Pseudomonas IDEXX Pseudalert (2461) x x Cryptosporidium EPA 1623 x x Radium-226 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide, Amenable SM 4500-CN G x x Radium-228 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide, Free SM 4500CN F x x x Radon-222 SM 7500RN x x Cyanide, Total EPA 335.4 x x x Residue, Filterable SM 2540C x x x Cyanogen Chloride
(screen)
In House Method (2470) x x Residue, Non-filterable SM 2540D x Diquat and Paraquat EPA 549.2 x x Residue, Total SM 2540B x x DBP/HAA SM 6251B x x Residue, Volatile EPA 160.4 x
Dissolved Oxygen SM 4500-O G x x Semi-VOC EPA 525.2 x x DOC SM 5310C x x Semi-VOC EPA 625 x x
E. Coli (MTF/EC+MUG) x x Silica SM 4500-Si D x x
E. Coli CFR 141.21(f)(6)(i) x x Silica SM 4500-SiO2 C x x E. Coli SM 9223 x Sulfide SM 4500-S
=
D x
E. Coli (Enumeration) SM 9221B.1/ SM 9221F x x Sulfite SM 4500-SO 3B x x x
E. Coli (Enumeration) SM 9223B x x Surfactants SM 5540C x x x EDB/DCBP EPA 504.1 x Taste and Odor Analytes SM 6040E x x EDB/DBCP and DBP EPA 551.1 x x Total Coliform (P/A) SM 9221 A, B x x EDTA and NTA In House Method (2454) x x
Total Coliform
(Enumeration)
SM 9221 A, B, C x x
Endothall EPA 548.1 x x Total Coliform / E. coli Colisure SM 9223 x x Endothall In-house Method (2445) x x Total Coliform SM 9221B x Enterococci SM 9230B x x
Total Coliform with Chlorine
Present
SM 9221B x
Fecal Coliform SM 9221 E (MTF/EC) x
Total Coliform / E.coli (P/A
and Enumeration)
SM 9223 x x
Fecal Coliform SM 9221C, E (MTF/EC) x TOC SM 5310C x x x Fecal Coliform
(Enumeration)
SM 9221E (MTF/EC) x x TOX SM 5320B x
Fecal Coliform with
Chlorine Present
SM 9221E x Total Phenols EPA 420.1 x
Fecal Streptococci SM 9230B x x Total Phenols EPA 420.4 x x x Fluoride SM 4500-F C x x x Total Phosphorous SM 4500 P E x Giardia EPA 1623 x x Turbidity EPA 180.1 x x x
Glyphosate EPA 547 x x Turbidity SM 2130B x x
Gross Alpha/Beta EPA 900.0 x x x Uranium by ICP/MS EPA 200.8 x x Gross Alpha Coprecipitation SM 7110 C x x x UV 254 SM 5910B x Hardness SM 2340B x x x VOC EPA 524.2/EPA 524.3 x x
Heterotrophic Bacteria In House Method (2439) x x VOC EPA 624 x x Heterotrophic Bacteria SM 9215 B x x VOC EPA SW 846 8260 x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.6 x x x VOC In House Method (2411) x x Yeast and Mold SM 9610 x x
Version 002 Issued: 09/21/2016
The tests listed below are accredited and meet the requirements of ISO 17025 as verified by the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board/ANAB.
Refer to Certificate and scope of accreditation (AT 1807) found at: http://www.eatonanalytical.com 750 Royal Oaks Dr., Ste 100, Monrovia, CA 91016 Tel (626) 386-1100 Fax (626) 386-1101 http://www.EatonAnalytical.com
Acknowledgement of Samples Received
CLSLABS
743191
ORGANICS
500 Series
Client ID:
Folder #:
Project:
Sample Group:
Addr: CLS Labs
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Project Manager:
Phone:
PO #:
Linda Geddes
(626) 386-1163
18F0272
Attn:
Phone:
CLS Data Reporting
The following samples were received from you on June 08, 2018 at 1057. They have been scheduled for the tests listed below each sample. If this information is incorrect, please contact your service representative. Thank you for using Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC.
Sample # Sample ID Sample Date
201806090601 KB-01-264 06/06/2018 1040
Variable ID: 18F0272-01
@DIQUAT @ML515.4 @ML525
@ML531.2 2,3,7,8-TCDD Endothall
Glyphosate
@DIQUAT -- Diquat and Paraquat
@ML515.4 -- Chlorophenoxy Herbicides
@ML525 -- Semivolatiles by GCMS
@ML531.2 -- Aldicarbs
Test Description
Reported: 07/09/2018 Page 1 of 1
750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100, Monrovia, CA 91016 Tel (626) 386-1100 Fax (866) 988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton
Laboratory Comments
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Analytical Results for Dioxins/Furans by 1613B are submitted by Eurofins Lancaster Folder Comments
Flags Legend:
LE - MRL Check recovery was above laboratory acceptance limits.
LK - The associated blank spike recovery was above method acceptance limits. This target analyte was not detected in the sample.
The Comments Report may be blank if there are no comments for this report. Comments - Page 1 of 1
Laboratory Hits
Samples Received on:
06/08/2018 1057
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Analyzed Analyte Sample ID Result Federal MCL Units MRL SUMMARY OF POSITIVE DATA ONLY Hits Report - Page 1 of 1
Laboratory Data
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
Samples Received on:
06/08/2018 1057
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution KB-01-264 (201806090601) Sampled on 06/06/2018 1040
Variable ID: 18F0272-01
EPA 515.4 - Chlorophenoxy Herbicides
06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) 2,4,5-T ug/L 0.2 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) ug/L 0.2 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) 2,4-D ug/L 0.1 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) 2,4-DB ug/L 2 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid ug/L 0.5 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Acifluorfen ug/L 0.2 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Bentazon ug/L 0.5 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Dalapon ug/L 1 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Dicamba ug/L 0.1 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Dichlorprop ug/L 0.5 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Dinoseb ug/L 0.2 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Pentachlorophenol ug/L 0.04 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) Picloram ug/L 0.1 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) ug/L 0.1 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid 99 1 06/20/18 06/21/18 03:24 1099613 1100294 (EPA 515.4) 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl 103 1 EPA 525.2 - Semivolatiles by GCMS
06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Acenaphthylene ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Alachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Aldrin ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) alpha-Chlordane ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Anthracene ug/L 0.02 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Atrazine ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Benz(a)Anthracene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 0.02 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(b)Fluoranthene ug/L 0.02 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ug/L 0.02 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Bromacil ug/L 0.2 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Butachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Butylbenzylphthalate ug/L 0.5 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Caffeine by method 525mod ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Chrysene ug/L 0.02 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ug/L 0.6 1 Data Report - Page 1 of 3
Rounding on totals after summation.
(c) - indicates calculated results
Laboratory Data
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
Samples Received on:
06/08/2018 1057
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L 0.6 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Diazinon (Qualitative) ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Dieldrin ug/L 0.2 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Diethylphthalate ug/L 0.5 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Dimethoate ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Dimethylphthalate ug/L 0.5 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Di-n-Butylphthalate ug/L 1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Endrin ug/L 0.2 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Fluoranthene ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Fluorene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) gamma-Chlordane ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Heptachlor ug/L 0.04 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Hexachlorobenzene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Isophorone ug/L 0.5 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Lindane ug/L 0.04 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Methoxychlor ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Metolachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Metribuzin ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Molinate ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Pentachlorophenol ug/L 1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Phenanthrene ug/L 0.04 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Propachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Pyrene ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Simazine ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Thiobencarb (ELAP) ug/L 0.2 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) ug/L 0.05 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Trifluralin ug/L 0.1 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene 95 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Acenaphthene-d10 74 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Chrysene-d12 84 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Perylene-d12 72 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Phenanthrene-d10 84 1 06/16/18 06/30/18 19:26 1098797 1103338 (EPA 525.2) Triphenylphosphate 118 1 EPA 548.1 - Endothall
Data Report - Page 2 of 3
Rounding on totals after summation.
(c) - indicates calculated results
Laboratory Data
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
Samples Received on:
06/08/2018 1057
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/12/18 06/14/18 13:49 1097682 1098332 (EPA 548.1) Endothall ug/L 20 4 EPA 547 - Glyphosate
06/11/18 18:41 1097414 (EPA 547) Glyphosate ug/L 6 1
EPA 531.2 - Aldicarbs
06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Aldicarb (Temik) ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Aldicarb sulfone ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Aldicarb sulfoxide ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Baygon ug/L 0.5 1
06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Carbaryl ug/L 0.5 1
06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Carbofuran (Furadan) ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Methiocarb ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Methomyl ug/L 0.5 1
06/13/18 02:48 1097674 (EPA 531.2) Oxamyl (Vydate) ug/L 0.5 1 1097674
arbamate
06/13/18 02:48 (EPA 531.2) 97 1
EPA 549.2 - Diquat and Paraquat
06/12/18 06/13/18 08:23 1097406 1097676 (EPA 549.2) Diquat ug/L 0.4 1 06/12/18 06/13/18 08:23 1097406 1097676 (EPA 549.2) Paraquat ug/L 2 1 EPA 1613B - 2,3,7,8-TCDD
06/16/18 06/16/18 15:18 (EPA 1613B) 2,3,7,8-TCDD pg/L 5 1 Data Report - Page 3 of 3
Rounding on totals after summation.
(c) - indicates calculated results
Laboratory QC Summary
CLS Labs
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Glyphosate
Analytical Batch: 1097414 Analysis Date: 06/11/2018
201806090601 KB-01-264 Analyzed by: XWO
Aldicarbs
Analytical Batch: 1097674 Analysis Date: 06/13/2018
201806090601 KB-01-264 Analyzed by: XWO
Diquat and Paraquat
Prep Batch: 1097406 Analytical Batch: 1097676 Analysis Date: 06/13/2018 201806090601 KB-01-264 Analyzed by: XWO
Endothall
Prep Batch: 1097682 Analytical Batch: 1098332 Analysis Date: 06/14/2018 201806090601 KB-01-264 Analyzed by: QMN6
Chlorophenoxy Herbicides
Prep Batch: 1099613 Analytical Batch: 1100294 Analysis Date: 06/21/2018 201806090601 KB-01-264 Analyzed by: A4H
Semivolatiles by GCMS
Prep Batch: 1098797 Analytical Batch: 1103338 Analysis Date: 06/30/2018 201806090601 KB-01-264 Analyzed by: JWC
QC Summary - Page 1 of 1
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Glyphosate by EPA 547
Analytical Batch: 1097414 Analysis Date: 06/11/2018
CCCH Glyphosate 25 23.7 ug/L 95 (80-120)
CCCM Glyphosate 10 9.44 ug/L 94 (80-120)
LCS1 Glyphosate 10 9.28 ug/L 93 (70-130)
MBLK Glyphosate ug/L
Glyphosate 6 6.09 ug/L 102 (50-150)
Glyphosate 10 10.2 ug/L 102 (70-130)
Glyphosate 10 10.3 ug/L 103 (70-130)
Glyphosate 10 9.82 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 3.8
Aldicarbs by EPA 531.2
Analytical Batch: 1097674 Analysis Date: 06/12/2018
CCCH 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 25 24.9 ug/L 100 (70-130)
CCCM 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 10 10.0 ug/L 100 (70-130)
LCS2 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 5 5.07 ug/L 101 (70-130)
MBLK 3-Hydroxycarbofuran ug/L
3-Hydroxycarbofuran 0.5 0.466 ug/L 93 (50-150)
3-Hydroxycarbofuran 5 5.30 ug/L 106 (70-130)
3-Hydroxycarbofuran 5 5.15 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 2.8
CCCH 98.1 98 (70-130)
CCCM 91.8 92 (70-130)
LCS2 98.0 98 (70-130)
MBLK 102 103 (70-130)
94.8 95 (70-130)
97.8 98 (70-130)
93.8 94 (70-130)
CCCH Aldicarb (Temik) 25 22.6 ug/L 91 (70-130)
CCCM Aldicarb (Temik) 10 9.33 ug/L 93 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldicarb (Temik) 5 4.75 ug/L 95 (70-130)
MBLK Aldicarb (Temik) ug/L
Aldicarb (Temik) 0.5 0.415 ug/L 83 (50-150)
Aldicarb (Temik) 5 5.08 ug/L 102 (70-130)
Aldicarb (Temik) 5 5.15 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 1.4
CCCH Aldicarb sulfone 25 24.6 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM Aldicarb sulfone 10 10.0 ug/L 100 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldicarb sulfone 5 5.39 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
MBLK Aldicarb sulfone ug/L
Aldicarb sulfone 0.5 0.530 ug/L 106 (50-150)
Aldicarb sulfone 5 5.26 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Aldicarb sulfone 5 5.29 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 0.53
CCCH Aldicarb sulfoxide 25 23.7 ug/L 95 (70-130)
CCCM Aldicarb sulfoxide 10 9.78 ug/L 98 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldicarb sulfoxide 5 4.29 ug/L 86 (70-130)
MBLK Aldicarb sulfoxide ug/L
Aldicarb sulfoxide 0.5 0.490 ug/L 98 (50-150)
Aldicarb sulfoxide 5 5.24 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Aldicarb sulfoxide 5 5.23 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 0.17
CCCH Baygon 25 24.5 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM Baygon 10 9.80 ug/L 98 (70-130)
LCS2 Baygon 5 5.20 ug/L 104 (70-130)
MBLK Baygon ug/L
Baygon 0.5 0.446 ug/L 89 (50-150)
Baygon 5 5.19 ug/L 104 (70-130)
Baygon 5 5.08 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 2.1
CCCH Carbaryl 25 24.9 ug/L 100 (70-130)
CCCM Carbaryl 10 9.87 ug/L 99 (70-130)
LCS2 Carbaryl 5 5.10 ug/L 102 (70-130)
MBLK Carbaryl ug/L
Carbaryl 0.5 0.492 ug/L 98 (50-150)
Carbaryl 5 5.19 ug/L 104 (70-130)
Carbaryl 5 5.20 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.15
CCCH Carbofuran (Furadan) 25 24.4 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM Carbofuran (Furadan) 10 9.90 ug/L 99 (70-130)
LCS2 Carbofuran (Furadan) 5 5.21 ug/L 104 (70-130)
MBLK Carbofuran (Furadan) ug/L
Carbofuran (Furadan) 0.5 0.516 ug/L 103 (50-150)
Carbofuran (Furadan) 5 5.19 ug/L 104 (70-130)
Carbofuran (Furadan) 5 4.98 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 4.1
CCCH Methiocarb 25 24.2 ug/L 97 (70-130)
CCCM Methiocarb 10 9.54 ug/L 95 (70-130)
LCS2 Methiocarb 5 4.89 ug/L 98 (70-130)
MBLK Methiocarb ug/L
Methiocarb 0.5 0.463 ug/L 93 (50-150)
Methiocarb 5 4.90 ug/L 98 (70-130)
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Methiocarb 5 4.93 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 0.49
CCCH Methomyl 25 23.1 ug/L 92 (70-130)
CCCM Methomyl 10 9.41 ug/L 94 (70-130)
LCS2 Methomyl 5 4.56 ug/L 91 (70-130)
MBLK Methomyl ug/L
Methomyl 0.5 0.536 ug/L 107 (50-150)
Methomyl 5 5.24 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Methomyl 5 5.19 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.99
CCCH Oxamyl (Vydate) 25 24.3 ug/L 97 (70-130)
CCCM Oxamyl (Vydate) 10 9.76 ug/L 98 (70-130)
LCS2 Oxamyl (Vydate) 5 4.72 ug/L 94 (70-130)
MBLK Oxamyl (Vydate) ug/L
Oxamyl (Vydate) 0.5 0.550 ug/L 110 (50-150)
Oxamyl (Vydate) 5 5.25 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Oxamyl (Vydate) 5 5.28 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 0.59
Diquat and Paraquat by EPA 549.2
Analytical Batch: 1097676 Analysis Date: 06/13/2018
CCCH Diquat 10 10.3 ug/L 103 (80-120)
CCCL Diquat 0.4 0.388 ug/L 97 (50-150)
CCCM Diquat 4 4.10 ug/L 102 (80-120)
LCS1 Diquat 5 4.24 ug/L 85 (70-130)
MBLK Diquat ug/L
Diquat 0.4 0.445 ug/L 111 (50-150)
Diquat 5 3.60 ug/L 72 (70-130)
Diquat 5 3.78 ug/L 76 (70-130)
Diquat 5 3.75 ug/L 75 (70-130) 20 4.0
CCCH Paraquat 10 11.3 ug/L 113 (80-120)
CCCL Paraquat 2 2.52 ug/L 126 (50-150)
CCCM Paraquat 4 4.74 ug/L 119 (80-120)
LCS1 Paraquat 5 4.88 ug/L 98 (70-130)
MBLK Paraquat ug/L
Paraquat 2 2.06 ug/L 103 (50-150)
Paraquat 5 4.26 ug/L 85 (70-130)
Paraquat 5 4.38 ug/L 88 (70-130)
Paraquat 5 4.31 ug/L 86 (70-130) 20 1.3
Endothall by EPA 548.1
Prep Batch: 1097682 Analytical Batch: 1098332 Analysis Date: 06/14/2018 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS1 Endothall 25 22.2 ug/L 89 (66-117)
MBLK Endothall ug/L
Endothall 5 5.92 ug/L 118 (50-150)
Endothall 25 23.6 ug/L 94 (66-117)
Endothall 25 25.6 ug/L 103 (66-117)
Endothall 25 23.9 ug/L 96 (66-117) 30 1.5
Chlorophenoxy Herbicides by EPA 515.4
Prep Batch: 1099613 Analytical Batch: 1100294 Analysis Date: 06/20/2018 CCC3 2,4,5-T 4 4.13 ug/L 103 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4,5-T 4 4.15 ug/L 104 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4,5-T 1 1.03 ug/L 103 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4,5-T ug/L
2,4,5-T 0.2 0.186 ug/L 93 (50-150)
2,4,5-T 3 3.15 ug/L 105 (70-130)
2,4,5-T 3 3.01 ug/L 100 (70-130) 30 4.7
CCC3 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 4 4.22 ug/L 105 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 4 4.19 ug/L 105 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 1 0.987 ug/L 99 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) ug/L
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.2 0.205 ug/L 102 (50-150)
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 3 3.14 ug/L 105 (70-130)
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 3 3.08 ug/L 103 (70-130) 30 1.8
CCC3 2,4-D 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4-D 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4-D 0.5 0.432 ug/L 86 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4-D ug/L
2,4-D 0.1 0.0858 ug/L 86 (50-150)
2,4-D 1.5 1.56 ug/L 104 (70-130)
2,4-D 1.5 1.53 ug/L 102 (70-130) 30 2.3
CCC3 2,4-DB 40 41.2 ug/L 103 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4-DB 40 40.9 ug/L 102 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4-DB 10 9.73 ug/L 97 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4-DB ug/L
2,4-DB 2 1.99 ug/L 99 (50-150)
2,4-DB 30 31.4 ug/L 105 (70-130)
2,4-DB 30 30.8 ug/L 103 (70-130) 30 1.8
CCC3 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 92.7 93 (70-130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
CCCH 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 96.7 97 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 92.1 92 (70-130) MBLK 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 96.8 97 (70-130) 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 99.2 99 (70-130)
2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 100 100 (70-130)
2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 89.8 90 (70-130)
CCC3 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 10 9.06 ug/L 91 (70-130)
CCCH 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 10 9.24 ug/L 92 (70-130)
CCCM 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 2.5 2.12 ug/L 85 (70-130) MBLK 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid ug/L
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 0.5 0.468 ug/L 94 (50-150)
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 7.5 8.43 ug/L 112 (70-130)
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 7.5 7.31 ug/L 98 (70-130) 30 14 CCC3 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 106 106 (70-130) CCCH 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 103 103 (50-150) CCCM 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 102 102 (50-150) MBLK 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 104 104 (50-150) 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 100 100 (50-150)
4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 91.8 92 (50-150)
4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 95.7 96 (50-150)
CCC3 Acifluorfen 4 4.40 ug/L 110 (70-130)
CCCH Acifluorfen 4 4.30 ug/L 108 (70-130)
CCCM Acifluorfen 1 1.05 ug/L 105 (70-130)
MBLK Acifluorfen ug/L
Acifluorfen 0.2 0.206 ug/L 103 (50-150)
Acifluorfen 3 3.28 ug/L 109 (70-130)
Acifluorfen 3 3.24 ug/L 108 (70-130) 30 1.3
CCC3 Bentazon 10 9.88 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCH Bentazon 10 9.78 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM Bentazon 2.5 2.28 ug/L 91 (70-130)
MBLK Bentazon ug/L
Bentazon 0.5 0.431 ug/L 86 (50-150)
Bentazon 7.5 7.93 ug/L 106 (70-130)
Bentazon 7.5 7.83 ug/L 104 (70-130) 30 1.3
CCC3 Dalapon 20 18.7 ug/L 94 (70-130)
CCCH Dalapon 20 18.3 ug/L 91 (70-130)
CCCM Dalapon 5 4.65 ug/L 93 (70-130)
MBLK Dalapon ug/L
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Dalapon 1 1.14 ug/L 114 (50-150)
Dalapon 15 17.4 ug/L 116 (70-130)
Dalapon 15 15.0 ug/L 100 (70-130) 30 14
CCC3 Dicamba 2 1.88 ug/L 94 (70-130)
CCCH Dicamba 2 1.90 ug/L 95 (70-130)
CCCM Dicamba 0.5 0.475 ug/L 95 (70-130)
MBLK Dicamba ug/L
Dicamba 0.1 0.118 ug/L 117 (50-150)
Dicamba 1.5 1.44 ug/L 96 (70-130)
Dicamba 1.5 1.42 ug/L 95 (70-130) 30 0.42
CCC3 Dichlorprop 10 10.1 ug/L 101 (70-130)
CCCH Dichlorprop 10 10.0 ug/L 100 (70-130)
CCCM Dichlorprop 2.5 2.24 ug/L 90 (70-130)
MBLK Dichlorprop ug/L
Dichlorprop 0.5 0.485 ug/L 97 (50-150)
Dichlorprop 7.5 7.88 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Dichlorprop 7.5 7.67 ug/L 102 (70-130) 30 2.7
CCC3 Dinoseb 4 4.23 ug/L 106 (70-130)
CCCH Dinoseb 4 4.20 ug/L 105 (70-130)
CCCM Dinoseb 1 0.982 ug/L 98 (70-130)
MBLK Dinoseb ug/L
Dinoseb 0.2 0.198 ug/L 99 (50-150)
Dinoseb 3 3.16 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Dinoseb 3 3.10 ug/L 103 (70-130) 30 1.8
CCC3 Pentachlorophenol 0.8 0.835 ug/L 104 (70-130)
CCCH Pentachlorophenol 0.8 0.800 ug/L 100 (70-130)
CCCM Pentachlorophenol 0.2 0.177 ug/L 89 (70-130)
MBLK Pentachlorophenol ug/L
Pentachlorophenol 0.04 0.0369 ug/L 92 (50-150)
Pentachlorophenol 0.6 0.682 ug/L 113 (70-130)
Pentachlorophenol 0.6 0.682 ug/L 113 (70-130) 30 0.044
CCC3 Picloram 2 1.86 ug/L 93 (70-130)
CCCH Picloram 2 1.82 ug/L 91 (70-130)
CCCM Picloram 0.5 0.415 ug/L 83 (70-130)
MBLK Picloram ug/L
Picloram 0.1 0.0921 ug/L 92 (50-150)
Picloram 1.5 1.82 ug/L 121 (70-130)
Picloram 1.5 1.64 ug/L 109 (70-130) 30 10
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
CCC3 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130)
CCCH 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
CCCM 0.5 0.533 ug/L 107 (70-130)
MBLK ug/L
0.1 0.128 ug/L 127 (50-150)
1.5 1.58 ug/L 105 (70-130)
1.5 1.58 ug/L 105 (70-130) 30 0.13
Semivolatiles by GCMS by EPA 525.2
Prep Batch: 1098797 Analytical Batch: 1102054 Analysis Date: 06/27/2018 LCS1 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 96.5 96 (70-130) LCS2 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 91.7 92 (70-130) MBLK 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 91.2 91 (70-130)
1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 92.1 92 (70-130)
1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 93.4 93 (70-130)
1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 92.8 93 (70-130)
LCS1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.32 ug/L 116 (70-130)
LCS2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.32 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 0.0 MBLK 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.1 0.125 ug/L 125 (50-150)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.30 ug/L 115 (70-130)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.34 ug/L 117 (70-130) 20 1.9
LCS1 Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 65.6 66 (50-150)
LCS2 Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 60.1 60 (50-150)
MBLK Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 67.3 67 (50-150)
Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 81.4 81 (50-150)
Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 57.6 58 (50-150)
Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 58.6 59 (50-150)
LCS1 Acenaphthylene 2 1.60 ug/L 80 (70-130)
LCS2 Acenaphthylene 2 1.74 ug/L 87 (70-130) 20 8.4
MBLK Acenaphthylene ug/L
Acenaphthylene 0.1 0.0790 ug/L 79 (50-150)
Acenaphthylene 2 1.80 ug/L 90 (70-130)
Acenaphthylene 2 1.71 ug/L 86 (70-130) 20 5.2
LCS1 Alachlor 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
LCS2 Alachlor 2 2.09 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 3.3
MBLK Alachlor ug/L
Alachlor 0.05 0.0430 ug/L 86 (50-150)
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Alachlor 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Alachlor 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130) 20 3.4
LCS1 Aldrin 2 1.48 ug/L 74 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldrin 2 1.61 ug/L 80 (70-130) 20 8.4
MBLK Aldrin ug/L
Aldrin 0.05 0.0450 ug/L 90 (50-150)
Aldrin 2 1.69 ug/L 85 (70-130)
Aldrin 2 1.62 ug/L 81 (70-130) 20 4.2
LCS1 alpha-Chlordane 2 2.05 ug/L 102 (70-130)
LCS2 alpha-Chlordane 2 1.92 ug/L 96 (70-130) 20 6.0
MBLK alpha-Chlordane ug/L
alpha-Chlordane 0.05 0.0490 ug/L 98 (50-150)
alpha-Chlordane 2 2.01 ug/L 101 (70-130)
alpha-Chlordane 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 4.3
LCS1 Anthracene 2 1.93 ug/L 97 (70-130)
LCS2 Anthracene 2 1.97 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 2.0
MBLK Anthracene ug/L
Anthracene 0.02 0.0190 ug/L 95 (50-150)
Anthracene 2 1.99 ug/L 100 (70-130)
Anthracene 2 2.02 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 1.9
LCS1 Atrazine 2 2.31 ug/L 116 (70-130)
LCS2 Atrazine 2 2.31 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 0.0
MBLK Atrazine ug/L
Atrazine 0.05 0.0560 ug/L 112 (50-150)
Atrazine 2 2.34 ug/L 117 (70-130)
Atrazine 2 2.45 ug/L 123 (70-130) 20 4.8
LCS1 Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.31 ug/L 116 (70-130)
LCS2 Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.13 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 8.1
MBLK Benz(a)Anthracene ug/L
Benz(a)Anthracene 0.05 0.0480 ug/L 96 (50-150)
Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130)
Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 1.9
LCS1 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.11 ug/L 105 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 6.0
MBLK Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.02 0.0150 ug/L 75 (50-150)
Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.27 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 1.3
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS1 Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.18 ug/L 109 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.27 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 4.0 MBLK Benzo(b)Fluoranthene ug/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 0.02 0.0260 ug/L 130 (50-150)
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130)
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.29 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 3.2
LCS1 Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.33 ug/L 117 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.38 ug/L 119 (70-130) 20 2.1 MBLK Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene ug/L
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 0.05 0.0720 ug/L 144 (50-150)
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.54 ug/L 127 (70-130)
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.50 ug/L 125 (70-130) 20 1.4
LCS1 Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.28 ug/L 114 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 0.88 MBLK Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ug/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 0.02 0.0240 ug/L 120 (50-150)
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130)
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.27 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 5.7
LCS1 Bromacil 2 2.38 ug/L 119 (70-130)
LCS2 Bromacil 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 5.2
MBLK Bromacil ug/L
Bromacil 0.1 0.109 ug/L 109 (50-150)
Bromacil 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130)
Bromacil 2 2.44 ug/L 122 (70-130) 20 9.3
LCS1 Butachlor 2 2.47 ug/L 124 (70-130)
LCS2 Butachlor 2 2.39 ug/L 120 (70-130) 20 3.3
MBLK Butachlor ug/L
Butachlor 0.05 0.0730 ug/L 146 (50-150)
Butachlor 2 2.46 ug/L 123 (70-130)
Butachlor 2 2.51 ug/L 126 (70-130) 20 1.8
LCS1 Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.51 ug/L 125 (70-130)
LCS2 Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.37 ug/L 119 (70-130) 20 5.7 MBLK Butylbenzylphthalate ug/L
Butylbenzylphthalate 0.15 0.193 ug/L 129 (50-150)
Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.44 ug/L 122 (70-130)
Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.57 ug/L 128 (70-130) 20 5.2
LCS1 Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.83 ug/L 92 (45-137)
LCS2 Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.64 ug/L 82 (45-137) 20 11 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
MBLK Caffeine by method 525mod ug/L
Caffeine by method 525mod 0.05 0.0490 ug/L 98 (50-150)
Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.83 ug/L 92 (46-144)
Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.87 ug/L 94 (46-144) 20 2.2 LCS1 Chrysene 2 2.02 ug/L 101 (70-130)
LCS2 Chrysene 2 1.92 ug/L 96 (70-130) 20 5.6
MBLK Chrysene ug/L
Chrysene 0.02 0.0210 ug/L 105 (50-150)
Chrysene 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130)
Chrysene 2 2.07 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 3.5
LCS1 Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 84.6 85 (50-150)
LCS2 Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 67.9 68 (50-150)
MBLK Chrysene-d12 (I) 71.8 72 (50-150)
Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 90.7 91 (50-150)
Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 69.5 70 (50-150)
Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 71.6 72 (50-150)
LCS1 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.53 ug/L 127 (70-130)
LCS2 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.47 ug/L 123 (70-130) 20 2.4 MBLK Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ug/L
Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 0.3 0.362 ug/L 121 (50-150)
Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.57 ug/L 129 (70-130)
Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.57 ug/L 128 (70-130) 20 0.16 LCS1 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.09 ug/L 104 (70-130) LCS2 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130) 20 6.0 MBLK Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L
Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.6 0.663 ug/L 111 (50-150)
Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.29 ug/L 114 (70-130)
Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 2.0 LCS1 Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.536 ug/L 27 (15-132)
LCS2 Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.565 ug/L 28 (15-132) 20 5.3 MBLK Diazinon (Qualitative) ug/L
Diazinon (Qualitative) 0.1 0.0270 ug/L 27 (15-132)
Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.761 ug/L 38 (15-132)
Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.671 ug/L 34 (15-132) 20 13
LCS1 Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.34 ug/L 117 (70-130)
LCS2 Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.46 ug/L 123 (70-130) 20 5.4 MBLK Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene ug/L
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 0.05 0.0760 ug/L 1 (50-150)
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.47 ug/L 123 (70-130)
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.43 ug/L 121 (70-130) 20 1.5
LCS1 Dieldrin 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
LCS2 Dieldrin 2 2.30 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 6.3
MBLK Dieldrin ug/L
Dieldrin 0.1 0.130 ug/L 130 (50-150)
Dieldrin 2 2.19 ug/L 109 (70-130)
Dieldrin 2 2.29 ug/L 114 (70-130) 20 4.7
LCS1 Diethylphthalate 2 2.29 ug/L 114 (70-130)
LCS2 Diethylphthalate 2 2.25 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 1.8
MBLK Diethylphthalate ug/L
Diethylphthalate 0.15 0.180 ug/L 120 (50-150)
Diethylphthalate 2 2.32 ug/L 116 (70-130)
Diethylphthalate 2 2.42 ug/L 121 (70-130) 20 4.0
LCS1 Dimethoate 2 1.85 ug/L 93 (35-100)
LCS2 Dimethoate 2 1.68 ug/L 84 (35-100) 20 9.6
MBLK Dimethoate ug/L
Dimethoate 0.1 0.0800 ug/L 80 (35-100)
Dimethoate 2 1.89 ug/L 95 (34-111)
Dimethoate 2 1.79 ug/L 90 (34-111) 20 5.5
LCS1 Dimethylphthalate 2 2.19 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 Dimethylphthalate 2 2.21 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 0.91 MBLK Dimethylphthalate ug/L
Dimethylphthalate 0.3 0.289 ug/L 96 (50-150)
Dimethylphthalate 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
Dimethylphthalate 2 2.32 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 4.0
LCS1 Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.39 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.36 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 0.46 MBLK Di-n-Butylphthalate ug/L
Di-n-Butylphthalate 0.3 0.334 ug/L 111 (50-150)
Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.57 ug/L 114 (70-130)
Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.61 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 0.96
LCS1 Endrin 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
LCS2 Endrin 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 6.9
MBLK Endrin ug/L
Endrin 0.1 0.115 ug/L 115 (50-150)
Endrin 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130)
Endrin 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 0.94
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS1 Fluoranthene 2 2.15 ug/L 108 (70-130)
LCS2 Fluoranthene 2 2.07 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 3.8
MBLK Fluoranthene ug/L
Fluoranthene 0.05 0.0480 ug/L 96 (50-150)
Fluoranthene 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130)
Fluoranthene 2 2.17 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 1.2
LCS1 Fluorene 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
LCS2 Fluorene 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 2.3
MBLK Fluorene ug/L
Fluorene 0.05 0.0550 ug/L 110 (50-150)
Fluorene 2 2.27 ug/L 113 (70-130)
Fluorene 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130) 20 1.7
LCS1 gamma-Chlordane 2 2.09 ug/L 104 (70-130)
LCS2 gamma-Chlordane 2 2.07 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 0.96
MBLK gamma-Chlordane ug/L
gamma-Chlordane 0.05 0.0480 ug/L 96 (50-150)
gamma-Chlordane 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130)
gamma-Chlordane 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 1.0
LCS1 Heptachlor 2 1.93 ug/L 97 (70-130)
LCS2 Heptachlor 2 1.95 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 1.0
MBLK Heptachlor ug/L
Heptachlor 0.04 0.0450 ug/L 113 (50-150)
Heptachlor 2 1.98 ug/L 99 (70-130)
Heptachlor 2 2.03 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 2.6
LCS1 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130) LCS2 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.07 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 0.96 MBLK Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) ug/L
Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 0.05 0.0580 ug/L 116 (50-150) Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 3.1 LCS1 Hexachlorobenzene 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130)
LCS2 Hexachlorobenzene 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 2.9
MBLK Hexachlorobenzene ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 0.0620 ug/L 124 (50-150)
Hexachlorobenzene 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Hexachlorobenzene 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 0.28
LCS1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 1.77 ug/L 88 (70-130)
LCS2 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 1.82 ug/L 91 (70-130) 20 2.8 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
MBLK Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.05 0.0590 ug/L 118 (50-150) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 1.78 ug/L 89 (70-130)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 1.73 ug/L 87 (70-130) 20 2.9 LCS1 Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.29 ug/L 114 (70-130)
LCS2 Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.41 ug/L 121 (70-130) 20 5.1 MBLK Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 0.05 0.0800 ug/L 160 (50-150)
Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.43 ug/L 121 (70-130)
Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.40 ug/L 120 (70-130) 20 1.2 LCS1 Isophorone 2 1.65 ug/L 82 (70-130)
LCS2 Isophorone 2 1.67 ug/L 84 (70-130) 20 1.2
MBLK Isophorone ug/L
Isophorone 0.1 0.0630 ug/L 63 (50-150)
Isophorone 2 1.71 ug/L 85 (70-130)
Isophorone 2 1.74 ug/L 87 (70-130) 20 1.9
LCS1 Lindane 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130)
LCS2 Lindane 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 2.7
MBLK Lindane ug/L
Lindane 0.04 0.0420 ug/L 105 (50-150)
Lindane 2 2.35 ug/L 117 (70-130)
Lindane 2 2.34 ug/L 117 (70-130) 20 0.30
LCS1 Methoxychlor 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
LCS2 Methoxychlor 2 2.25 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 4.1
MBLK Methoxychlor ug/L
Methoxychlor 0.1 0.117 ug/L 117 (50-150)
Methoxychlor 2 2.21 ug/L 110 (70-130)
Methoxychlor 2 2.31 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 4.6
LCS1 Metolachlor 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130)
LCS2 Metolachlor 2 2.23 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 1.3
MBLK Metolachlor ug/L
Metolachlor 0.05 0.0510 ug/L 102 (50-150)
Metolachlor 2 2.31 ug/L 115 (70-130)
Metolachlor 2 2.31 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 0.087
LCS1 Metribuzin 2 1.98 ug/L 99 (70-130)
LCS2 Metribuzin 2 1.89 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 4.7
MBLK Metribuzin ug/L
Metribuzin 0.05 0.0410 ug/L 82 (50-150)
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Metribuzin 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130)
Metribuzin 2 1.91 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 6.4
LCS1 Molinate 2 2.19 ug/L 109 (70-130)
LCS2 Molinate 2 2.15 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 1.8
MBLK Molinate ug/L
Molinate 0.1 0.0860 ug/L 86 (50-150)
Molinate 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130)
Molinate 2 2.15 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 3.2
LCS1 Perylene-d12 (S) 5 105 105 (70-130)
LCS2 Perylene-d12 (S) 5 107 107 (70-130)
MBLK Perylene-d12 (S) 90.6 91 (70-130)
Perylene-d12 (S) 5 94.5 95 (70-130)
Perylene-d12 (S) 5 105 105 (70-130)
Perylene-d12 (S) 5 106 106 (70-130)
LCS1 Phenanthrene 2 2.06 ug/L 103 (70-130)
LCS2 Phenanthrene 2 2.09 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 1.5
MBLK Phenanthrene ug/L
Phenanthrene 0.02 0.0200 ug/L 100 (50-150)
Phenanthrene 2 2.08 ug/L 104 (70-130)
Phenanthrene 2 2.09 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.72
LCS1 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 73.1 73 (50-150)
LCS2 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 65.3 65 (50-150)
MBLK Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 72.4 72 (50-150)
Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 89.6 90 (50-150)
Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 64.3 64 (50-150)
Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 65.9 66 (50-150)
LCS1 Propachlor 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130)
LCS2 Propachlor 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 3.7
MBLK Propachlor ug/L
Propachlor 0.05 0.0520 ug/L 104 (50-150)
Propachlor 2 2.15 ug/L 107 (70-130)
Propachlor 2 2.25 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 4.7
LCS1 Pyrene 2 2.18 ug/L 109 (70-130)
LCS2 Pyrene 2 2.11 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 3.3
MBLK Pyrene ug/L
Pyrene 0.05 0.0510 ug/L 102 (50-150)
Pyrene 2 2.15 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Pyrene 2 2.18 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 1.4
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743191
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS1 Simazine 2 2.42 ug/L 121 (70-130)
LCS2 Simazine 2 2.35 ug/L 118 (70-130) 20 2.9
MBLK Simazine ug/L
Simazine 0.05 0.0570 ug/L 114 (50-150)
Simazine 2 2.40 ug/L 120 (70-130)
Simazine 2 2.49 ug/L 124 (70-130) 20 3.5
LCS1 Thiobencarb 2 2.25 ug/L 112 (70-130)
LCS2 Thiobencarb 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 2.3
MBLK Thiobencarb ug/L
Thiobencarb 0.1 0.0940 ug/L 94 (50-150)
Thiobencarb 2 2.28 ug/L 114 (70-130)
Thiobencarb 2 2.31 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 1.4
LCS1 2 2.08 ug/L 104 (70-130)
LCS2 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 2.4
MBLK ug/L
0.05 0.0520 ug/L 104 (50-150)
2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
2 2.18 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 0.74
LCS1 Trifluralin 2 2.19 ug/L 109 (70-130)
LCS2 Trifluralin 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 2.3
MBLK Trifluralin ug/L
Trifluralin 0.1 0.0900 ug/L 90 (50-150)
Trifluralin 2 2.28 ug/L 114 (70-130)
Trifluralin 2 2.33 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 2.2
LCS1 Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 120 120 (70-130)
LCS2 Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 110 110 (70-130)
MBLK Triphenylphosphate (S) 116 116 (70-130)
Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 115 115 (70-130)
Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 112 112 (70-130)
Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 117 117 (70-130)
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
ANALYSIS REPORT
Prepared by:
Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental
2425 New Holland Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
Prepared for:
Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc
Suite 100
750 Royal Oaks Drive
Monrovia CA 91016
Report Date: June 21, 2018 13:37
Project: 743191
Account #: 14482
Group Number: 1955245
PO Number: 99-59325
State of Sample Origin: CA
Regulatory agencies do not accredit laboratories for all methods, analytes, and matrices. Our current scopes of accreditation can be viewed at http://www.eurofinsus.com/environmenttesting/laboratories/eurofins-lancaster-laboratories-environmental/resources/certifications/ . To request copies of prior scopes of accreditation, contact your project manager.
Electronic Copy To Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc Attn: EEAI Reports Respectfully Submitted,
(717) 556-7383
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Client Sample Description Sample Collection
Date/Time
ELLE#
KB-01-264 Potable Water 06/06/2018 10:40 9660102
The specific methodologies used in obtaining the enclosed analytical results are indicated on the Laboratory Sample Analysis Record.
Project Name: 743191
ELLE Group #: 1955245
General Comments:
See the Laboratory Sample Analysis Record section of the Analysis Report for the method references.
All QC met criteria unless otherwise noted in an Analysis Specific Comment below.
Refer to the QC Summary for specific values and acceptance criteria.
Project specific QC samples are not included in this data set.
Matrix QC may not be reported if site-specific QC samples were not submitted. In these situations, to demonstrate precision and accuracy at a batch level, a LCS/LCSD was performed, unless otherwise specified in the method.
Surrogate recoveries (if applicable) which are outside of the QC window are confirmed unless attributed to a dilution or otherwise noted in an Analysis Specific Comment below.
The samples were received at the appropriate temperature and in accordance with the chain of custody unless otherwise noted.
Analysis Specific Comments:
No additional comments are necessary.
Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc
ELLE Sample #:PW 9660102
ELLE Group #: 1955245
Matrix: Potable Water
Sample Description: KB-01-264 Potable Water
Folder# 743191 Sub PO# 99-59325 Job# 1000014
Project Name: 743191
Collection Date/Time: 06/06/2018 10:40
Submittal Date/Time: 06/14/2018 10:10
MRL
EDL* A Result nalysis Name CAS Number
Dilution
Factor
CAT
No.
EPA 1613B Oc pg/l pg/l pg/l Dioxins/Furans tober 1994
12935 2378-TCDD 1746-01-6 N.D. 0.295 5.26 1
Labeled Compounds %Rec Windows
13C12-2378-TCDD 69 25 - 164
Dioxins/Furans Data Qualifiers:
B Detected in Method Blank
U Undetected
J Estimated concentration between Estimated Detection Limit and Minimum Reporting Level E Exceeds calibration range
C Confirmed quantitation on secondary GC column
Q EMPC - Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration
F Interference is present
S Saturation of detection signal
Sample Comments
CA ELAP Lab Certification No. 2792
All QC is compliant unless otherwise noted. Please refer to the Quality Control Summary for overall QC performance data and associated samples.
Laboratory Sample Analysis Record
Analyst Dilution
Factor
Trial# Batch# Analysis
Date and Time
CAT
No.
Analysis Name Method
12935 2378-TCDD in Potable Water EPA 1613B October
1994
1 18166001 06/16/2018 15:18 Joseph D Anderson 1
10914 Dioxins/Furans in Water - SepF EPA 1613B October
1994
1 18166001 06/15/2018 07:00 Deborah M Zimmerman 1
EDL = Estimated Detection Limit
*=This limit was used in the evaluation of the final result
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc Group Number: 1955245 Reported: 06/21/2018 13:37
Matrix QC may not be reported if insufficient sample or site-specific QC samples were not submitted. In these situations, to demonstrate precision and accuracy at a batch level, a LCS/LCSD was performed, unless otherwise specified in the method.
All Inorganic Initial Calibration and Continuing Calibration Blanks met acceptable method criteria unless otherwise noted on the Analysis Report.
Method Blank
Analysis Name Result EDL** MRL
pg/l pg/l pg/l
Batch number: 18166001 Sample number(s): 9660102
2378-TCDD N.D. 0.308 5.00
OPR/OPRD
RPD
Max
OPR/OPRD
Limits
OPRD
%REC
OPR
%REC
OPRD
Conc
OPRD Spike
Added
OPR
Conc
OPR Spike
Added
Analysis Name RPD
pg/l pg/l pg/l pg/l
Batch number: 18166001 Sample number(s): 9660102
2378-TCDD 2.00 2.35 118 67-158
Surrogate recoveries which are outside of the QC window are confirmed unless attributed to dilution or otherwise noted on the Analysis Report.
Surrogate Quality Control
Analysis Name: 2378-TCDD in Potable Water
Batch number: 18166001
13C12-2378-TCDD
9660102 69
Blank 69
13C12-2378-TCDD
Limits: 25-164
13C12-2378-TCDD
OPR 73
13C12-2378-TCDD
Limits: 20-175
*- Outside of specification
**-This limit was used in the evaluation of the final result for the blank (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the MRL. (2) The unspiked result was more than four times the spike added.
P###### is indicative of a Background or Unspiked sample that is batch matrix QC and was not performed using a sample from this submission group.
Explanation of Symbols and Abbreviations
3768 0717
The following defines common symbols and abbreviations used in reporting technical data:
BMQL Below Minimum Quantitation Level
C degrees Celsius
cfu colony forming units
CP Units cobalt-chloroplatinate units
F degrees Fahrenheit
g gram(s)
IU International Units
kg kilogram(s)
L liter(s)
lb. pound(s)
m3 cubic meter(s)
meq milliequivalents
mg milligram(s)
mL milliliter(s)
MPN Most Probable Number
N.D. non-detect
ng nanogram(s)
NTU nephelometric turbidity units
pg/L picogram/liter
RL Reporting Limit
TNTC Too Numerous To Count
µg microgram(s)
µL microliter(s)
umhos/cm micromhos/cm
< less than
> greater than
ppm parts per million - One ppm is equivalent to one milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) or one gram per million grams. For aqueous liquids, ppm is usually taken to be equivalent to milligrams per liter (mg/l), because one liter of water has a weight very close to a kilogram. For gases or vapors, one ppm is equivalent to one microliter per liter of gas. ppb parts per billion
Dry weight Results printed under this heading have been adjusted for moisture content. This increases the analyte weight basis concentration to approximate the value present in a similar sample without moisture. All other results are reported on an as-received basis.
Analytical test results meet all requirements of the associated regulatory program (i.e., NELAC (TNI), DoD, and ISO 17025) unless otherwise noted under the individual analysis.
Measurement uncertainty values, as applicable, are available upon request.
Tests results relate only to the sample tested. Clients should be aware that a critical step in a chemical or microbiological analysis is the collection of the sample. Unless the sample analyzed is truly representative of the bulk of material involved, the test results will be meaningless. If you have questions regarding the proper techniques of collecting samples, please contact us. We cannot be held responsible for sample integrity, however, unless sampling has been performed by a member of our staff.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
Times are local to the area of activity. Parameters listed in the 40 CFR Part 136 Table II as “analyze immediately” are not performed within 15 minutes.
WARRANTY AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY - In accepting analytical work, we warrant the accuracy of test results for the sample as submitted.
THE FOREGOING EXPRESS WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IS GIVEN IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. WE DISCLAIM ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING A WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY. IN NO EVENT SHALL EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES
ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFIT OR GOODWILL REGARDLESS OF (A) THE NEGLIGENCE (EITHER SOLE OR
CONCURRENT) OF EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES ENVIRONMENTAL AND (B) WHETHER EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES ENVIRONMENTAL HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. No purchase order or other order for work shall be accepted by Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental which includes any conditions that vary from the Standard Terms and Conditions, and Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental hereby objects to any conflicting terms contained in any acceptance or order submitted by client.
Data Qualifiers
Qualifier Definition
C Result confirmed by reanalysis
D1 Indicates for dual column analyses that the result is reported from column 1 D2 Indicates for dual column analyses that the result is reported from column 2 E Concentration exceeds the calibration range
K1 Initial Calibration Blank is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND K2 Continuing Calibration Blank is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND K3 Initial Calibration Verification is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND K4 Continuing Calibration Verification is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND J (or G, I, X) Estimated value >= the Method Detection Limit (MDL or DL) and < the Limit of Quantitation (LOQ or RL) P Concentration difference between the primary and confirmation column >40%. The lower result is reported.
U Analyte was not detected at the value indicated
V Concentration difference between the primary and confirmation column >100%. The reporting limit is raised due to this disparity and evident interference.
W The dissolved oxygen uptake for the unseeded blank is greater than 0.20 mg/L.
Z Laboratory Defined - see analysis report
Additional Organic and Inorganic CLP qualifiers may be used with Form 1 reports as defined by the CLP methods.
Qualifiers specific to Dioxin/Furans and PCB Congeners are detailed on the individual Analysis Report.
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 06/07/18 16:57. Samples were analyzed pursuant to client request utilizing EPA or other ELAP approved methodologies. I certify that the results are in compliance both technically and for completeness.
Analytical results are attached to this letter. Please call if we can provide additional assistance.
Sincerely,
James Liang, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
CA SWRCB ELAP Accreditation/Registration number 1233
Project Name: Riverview MHP
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Joe Zilles
July 19, 2018 CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Chlorinated Pesticides and PCBs by EPA Method 508
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 Aldrin ND 0.075 µg/L 1 1804641 06/08/18 06/09/18 EPA 508 Chlordane ND 0.10 " " " " " "
Chlorothalonil ND 5.0 " " " " " "
Dieldrin ND 0.020 " " " " " "
Endrin ND 0.10 " " " " " "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 0.20 " " " " " "
Heptachlor ND 0.010 " " " " " "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.010 " " " " " "
Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 1.0 " " " " " "
Methoxychlor ND 10 " " " " " "
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Total " " " " "
PCBs)
ND 0.50 "
Propachlor ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Toxaphene ND 1.0 " " " " " "
Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 61 % 50-150 " " " "
Surrogate: Tetrachloro-meta-xylene 73 % 50-150 " " " "
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 Aggressive Index 12.1 N/A 1 1804872 06/13/18 06/13/18 NONE Bicarbonate as CaCO3 340 5.0 mg/L " 1804798 06/11/18 06/11/18 SM2320B Calcium 65 1.0 " " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 200.7/2340B Carbonate as CaCO3 ND 5.0 " " 1804798 06/11/18 06/11/18 SM2320B Chloride 24 0.50 " " 1804696 06/08/18 06/08/18 EPA 300.0 Cyanide (total) ND 0.0050 " " 1804712 06/08/18 06/08/18 SM4500-CN E Fluoride ND 0.10 " " 1804696 06/08/18 06/08/18 EPA 300.0 Hardness as CaCO3 280 1.0 " " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 200.7/2340B Hydroxide as CaCO3 ND 5.0 " " 1804798 06/11/18 06/11/18 SM2320B Langlier Index -0.16 Std. Units " 1804883 06/13/18 SM 203, 16th Ed.
06/13/18
Magnesium 28 1.0 mg/L " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 200.7/2340B MBAS as LAS, mol wt 340 ND 0.10 " " 1804710 06/08/18 06/08/18 SM5540 C Nitrate as N 8.4 2.0 " 5 1804696 06/08/18 06/08/18 EPA 300.0 Nitrite as N ND 0.40 " " 1 " " "
pH 7.33 0.01 pH Units " 1804700 06/08/18 06/08/18 SM4500-H B HT-F Potassium 3.9 1.0 mg/L " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 200.7/2340B Sodium 70 1.0 " " " " " "
sqrt(meq/L 1804912 06/14/18
)
Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1.8 " 06/14/18 None
Specific Conductance (EC) 880 1.0 µmhos/cm " 1804699 06/08/18 06/08/18 EPA 120.1 Sulfate as SO4 79 2.5 mg/L 5 1804696 06/08/18 06/08/18 EPA 300.0 Total Alkalinity 340 5.0 " 1 1804798 06/11/18 06/11/18 SM2320B Total Dissolved Solids 580 10 " " 1804818 06/12/18 06/13/18 SM2540C 3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
EDB and DBCP by EPA Method 504.1
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 0.010 µg/L 1 1804917 06/14/18 06/14/18 EPA 504.1 Ethylene dibromide ND 0.020 " " " " " "
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 Uranium 53 20 µg/L 1 1804759 06/11/18 07/12/18 EPA 200.8 KB-01-133-CWT (18F0405-02) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 Uranium 48 20 µg/L 1 1804759 06/11/18 07/13/18 EPA 200.8 3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Metals (Dissolved) by EPA 200 Series Methods
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 Aluminum ND 50 µg/L 1 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7 Antimony ND 4.0 " " 1804858 06/13/18 07/09/18 EPA 200.8 Arsenic 4.5 2.0 " " " " 06/13/18 "
Barium 270 100 " " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7
Beryllium ND 1.0 " " " " " "
Boron ND 100 " " " " " "
Cadmium ND 1.0 " " 1804858 06/13/18 06/13/18 EPA 200.8
Chromium ND 10 " " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7
Copper ND 50 " " " " " "
Iron ND 100 " " " " " "
Lead ND 5.0 " " 1804858 06/13/18 06/13/18 EPA 200.8
Manganese ND 20 " " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7 Mercury ND 0.20 " " 1804802 06/11/18 06/13/18 EPA 245.1 Nickel ND 10 " " 1804858 06/13/18 06/13/18 EPA 200.8
Selenium ND 5.0 " " " " " "
Silver ND 10 " " " " " "
Thallium ND 1.0 " " " " 06/14/18 "
Vanadium 20 3.0 " " " " 06/13/18 "
Zinc ND 50 " " 1804807 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Metals (Drinking Water) by EPA 200 Series Methods
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 Aluminum 270 50 µg/L 1 1804761 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7 Antimony ND 4.0 " " 1804759 06/11/18 06/11/18 EPA 200.8 Arsenic 3.7 2.0 " " " " " "
Barium 310 100 " " 1804761 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7
Beryllium ND 1.0 " " " " " "
Boron ND 100 " " " " " "
Cadmium ND 1.0 " " 1804759 06/11/18 06/11/18 EPA 200.8
Chromium ND 10 " " 1804761 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7
Copper ND 50 " " " " " "
Iron 250 100 " " " " " "
Lead ND 5.0 " " 1804759 06/11/18 06/11/18 EPA 200.8
Manganese 37 20 " " 1804761 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7 Mercury ND 1.0 " " 1804802 06/11/18 06/13/18 EPA 245.1
Nickel ND 10 " " 1804759 06/11/18 06/11/18 EPA 200.8
Selenium ND 5.0 " " " " " " QC-2H
Silver ND 10 " " " " " "
Thallium ND 1.0 " " " " " "
Vanadium 22 3.0 " " " " " "
Zinc ND 50 " " 1804761 06/11/18 06/12/18 EPA 200.7
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Microbiological Parameters by APHA Standard Methods
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 E. Coli Present 0.0 N/A 1 1804745 06/08/18 06/09/18 SM 9223 Total Coliforms Present 0.0 " " " " " "
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Purgeable Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.50 µg/L 1 1804837 06/11/18 06/11/18 EPA 524.2 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane " " " " "
(Freon 113)
ND 10 "
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.50 " " " " " "
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Benzene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Chlorobenzene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Ethylbenzene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 3.0 " " " " " "
Methylene chloride ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Styrene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Toluene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Total Trihalomethanes (THM) ND 0.50 " " " " " "
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Trichloroethene ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 " " " " " "
Vinyl chloride ND 0.50 " " " " " "
Xylenes (total) ND 0.50 " " " " " "
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Purgeable Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2
Analyte Result Limit
Reporting
Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes
KB-01-133 (18F0405-01) DW Sampled: 06/07/18 09:50 Received: 06/07/18 16:57 Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 93 % 66-135 1804837 " 06/11/18 EPA 524.2 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 114 % 70-130 " " " "
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99 % 70-130 " " " "
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Chlorinated Pesticides and PCBs by EPA Method 508 - Quality Control Batch 1804641 - EPA 3510B GCNV
Blank (1804641-BLK1) Prepared: 06/07/18 Analyzed: 06/09/18 Aldrin ND 0.075 µg/L
Chlordane ND 0.10 "
Chlorothalonil ND 5.0 "
Dieldrin ND 0.020 "
Endrin ND 0.10 "
gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 0.20 "
Heptachlor ND 0.010 "
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.010 "
Hexachlorobenzene ND 0.50 "
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 1.0 "
Methoxychlor ND 10 "
Propachlor ND 0.50 "
Toxaphene ND 1.0 "
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Total PCBs) ND 0.50 "
Surrogate: Tetrachloro-meta-xylene 0.189 " 0.250 76 50-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.230 " 0.250 92 50-150
LCS (1804641-BS1) Prepared: 06/07/18 Analyzed: 06/09/18 Aldrin 0.440 0.075 0.500 µg/L 88 50-130
Dieldrin 0.497 0.020 0.500 " 99 48-129
gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.458 0.20 0.500 " 92 49-127
Surrogate: Tetrachloro-meta-xylene 0.163 " 0.250 65 50-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.208 " 0.250 83 50-150
LCS Dup (1804641-BSD1) Prepared: 06/07/18 Analyzed: 06/09/18 Aldrin 0.473 0.075 0.500 µg/L 95 7 50-130 30
Dieldrin 0.520 0.020 0.500 " 104 4 48-129 30
gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.487 0.20 0.500 " 97 6 49-127 30
Surrogate: Tetrachloro-meta-xylene 0.186 " 0.250 74 50-150 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.231 " 0.250 92 50-150
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804696 - General Prep
Blank (1804696-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
Fluoride ND 0.10 mg/L
Sulfate as SO4 ND 0.50 "
Chloride ND 0.50 "
Nitrite as N ND 0.40 "
Nitrate as N ND 0.40 "
LCS (1804696-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
Chloride 4.64 0.50 5.00 mg/L 93 80-120
Sulfate as SO4 4.45 0.50 5.00 " 89 80-120
Fluoride 2.05 0.10 2.00 " 103 80-120
Nitrite as N 1.92 0.40 2.00 " 96 80-120
Nitrate as N 1.98 0.40 2.00 " 99 80-120
LCS Dup (1804696-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
Fluoride 2.03 0.10 2.00 mg/L 102 1 80-120 20
Sulfate as SO4 4.50 0.50 5.00 " 90 1 80-120 20
Chloride 4.74 0.50 5.00 " 95 2 80-120 20
Nitrite as N 1.95 0.40 2.00 " 97 2 80-120 20
Nitrate as N 2.02 0.40 2.00 " 101 2 80-120 20
Matrix Spike (1804696-MS1) Source: 18F0414-02 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18 Sulfate as SO4 4.82 0.50 5.00 mg/L ND 96 80-120
Chloride 4.88 0.50 5.00 0.380 " 90 80-120
Fluoride 2.54 0.10 2.00 0.673 " 93 80-120
Nitrate as N 1.99 0.40 2.00 " ND 100 80-120
Nitrite as N 1.95 0.40 2.00 " ND 98 80-120
Matrix Spike Dup (1804696-MSD1) Source: 18F0414-02 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18 Sulfate as SO4 4.73 0.50 5.00 mg/L ND 95 2 80-120 20
Fluoride 2.50 0.10 2.00 0.673 " 92 1 80-120 20
Chloride 4.80 0.50 5.00 0.380 " 88 2 80-120 20
Nitrate as N 1.96 0.40 2.00 " ND 98 2 80-120 20
Nitrite as N 1.93 0.40 2.00 " ND 96 1 80-120 20
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804699 - General Preparation
Blank (1804699-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
Specific Conductance (EC) ND 1.0 µmhos/cm
Batch 1804710 - General Preparation
Blank (1804710-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
MBAS as LAS, mol wt 340 ND 0.10 mg/L
LCS (1804710-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
MBAS as LAS, mol wt 340 0.462 0.10 0.500 mg/L 92 80-120 LCS Dup (1804710-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
MBAS as LAS, mol wt 340 0.474 0.10 0.500 mg/L 95 3 80-120 20 Matrix Spike (1804710-MS1) Source: 18F0373-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18 MBAS as LAS, mol wt 340 0.439 0.10 0.500 mg/L ND 88 75-125 Matrix Spike Dup (1804710-MSD1) Source: 18F0373-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18 MBAS as LAS, mol wt 340 0.447 0.10 0.500 mg/L ND 89 2 75-125 25 Batch 1804712 - General Preparation
Blank (1804712-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
Cyanide (total) ND 0.0050 mg/L
LCS (1804712-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
Cyanide (total) 0.0880 0.0050 0.100 mg/L 88 75-125
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804712 - General Preparation
LCS Dup (1804712-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18
Cyanide (total) 0.0891 0.0050 0.100 mg/L 89 1 75-125 25 Matrix Spike (1804712-MS1) Source: 18F0242-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18 Cyanide (total) 0.0898 0.0050 0.100 0.00350 mg/L 86 75-125 Matrix Spike Dup (1804712-MSD1) Source: 18F0242-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/08/18 Cyanide (total) 0.0917 0.0050 0.100 0.00350 mg/L 88 2 75-125 25 Batch 1804798 - General Preparation
Blank (1804798-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Total Alkalinity ND 5.0 mg/L
Bicarbonate as CaCO3 ND 5.0 "
Carbonate as CaCO3 ND 5.0 "
Hydroxide as CaCO3 ND 5.0 "
Duplicate (1804798-DUP1) Source: 18F0358-02 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18 Total Alkalinity 243 5.0 241 mg/L 1 20
Bicarbonate as CaCO3 243 5.0 241 " 1 20
Carbonate as CaCO3 ND 5.0 " ND 20
Hydroxide as CaCO3 ND 5.0 " ND 20
Batch 1804807 - 6010A/No Digestion
Blank (1804807-BLK1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Calcium ND 1.0 mg/L
Hardness as CaCO3 ND 1.0 "
Magnesium ND 1.0 "
Potassium ND 1.0 "
Sodium ND 1.0 "
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804807 - 6010A/No Digestion
LCS (1804807-BS1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Calcium 4.63 1.0 5.00 mg/L 93 85-115
Magnesium 4.56 1.0 5.00 " 91 85-115
Potassium 4.86 1.0 5.00 " 97 85-115
Sodium 4.89 1.0 5.00 " 98 85-115
Matrix Spike (1804807-MS1) Source: 18F0358-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Calcium 30.8 1.0 5.00 27.9 mg/L 58 70-130 QM-4X
Magnesium 28.8 1.0 5.00 25.6 " 65 70-130 QM-4X
Potassium 6.51 1.0 5.00 1.95 " 91 70-130
Sodium 62.9 1.0 5.00 61.3 " 32 70-130 QM-4X
Matrix Spike (1804807-MS2) Source: 18F0488-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Calcium 5.79 1.0 5.00 1.61 mg/L 84 70-130
Magnesium 4.60 1.0 5.00 0.362 " 85 70-130
Potassium 4.87 1.0 5.00 " ND 97 70-130
Sodium 5.93 1.0 5.00 1.54 " 88 70-130
Batch 1804818 - General Preparation
Blank (1804818-BLK1) Prepared: 06/12/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Total Dissolved Solids ND 10 mg/L
Duplicate (1804818-DUP1) Source: 18F0373-01 Prepared: 06/12/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Total Dissolved Solids 233 10 238 mg/L 2 20
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
EDB and DBCP by EPA Method 504.1 - Quality Control
Batch 1804917 - EPA 504.1
Blank (1804917-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/14/18
Ethylene dibromide ND 0.020 µg/L
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 0.010 "
LCS (1804917-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/14/18
Ethylene dibromide 0.253 0.020 0.286 µg/L 89 60-140
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.276 0.010 0.286 " 97 60-140 LCS Dup (1804917-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/14/18
Ethylene dibromide 0.257 0.020 0.286 µg/L 90 1 60-140 30 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.302 0.010 0.286 " 106 9 60-140 30 Matrix Spike (1804917-MS1) Source: 18F0405-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/14/18 Ethylene dibromide 0.287 0.020 0.286 µg/L ND 101 60-140 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.281 0.010 0.286 " ND 98 60-140 Matrix Spike Dup (1804917-MSD1) Source: 18F0405-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/14/18 Ethylene dibromide 0.311 0.020 0.286 µg/L ND 109 8 60-140 30 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.300 0.010 0.286 " ND 105 7 60-140 30 3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
Batch 1804759 - EPA 200 Series
Blank (1804759-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Uranium ND 20 µg/L
LCS (1804759-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Uranium 106 20 100 µg/L 106 85-115
Matrix Spike (1804759-MS1) Source: 18F0246-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18 Uranium 120 20 100 0.230 µg/L 119 70-130
Matrix Spike (1804759-MS2) Source: 18F0291-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18 Uranium 115 20 100 0.0100 µg/L 115 70-130
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals (Dissolved) by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804802 - EPA 7470A
Blank (1804802-BLK1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury ND 0.20 µg/L
LCS (1804802-BS1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury 4.59 0.20 5.00 µg/L 92 85-115
Matrix Spike (1804802-MS1) Source: 18F0171-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury 4.62 0.20 5.00 µg/L ND 92 70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (1804802-MSD1) Source: 18F0171-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury 4.71 0.20 5.00 µg/L ND 94 2 70-130 25
Batch 1804807 - 6010A/No Digestion
Blank (1804807-BLK1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum ND 50 µg/L
Barium ND 100 "
Boron ND 100 "
Beryllium 1.86 1.0 " QB-2
Chromium ND 10 "
Copper ND 50 "
Iron ND 100 "
Manganese ND 20 "
Zinc ND 50 "
LCS (1804807-BS1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum 5010 50 5000 µg/L 100 85-115
Barium 937 100 1000 " 94 85-115
Boron 974 100 1000 " 97 85-115
Beryllium 932 1.0 1000 " 93 85-115
Chromium 972 10 1000 " 97 85-115
Copper 981 50 1000 " 98 85-115
Iron 1050 100 1000 " 105 85-115
Manganese 1020 20 1000 " 102 85-115
Zinc 973 50 1000 " 97 85-115
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals (Dissolved) by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804807 - 6010A/No Digestion
Matrix Spike (1804807-MS1) Source: 18F0358-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum 4660 50 5000 µg/L ND 93 70-130
Barium 914 100 1000 174 " 74 70-130
Boron 1210 100 1000 456 " 76 70-130
Beryllium 760 1.0 1000 " ND 76 70-130
Chromium 766 10 1000 " ND 77 70-130
Copper 750 50 1000 4.79 " 74 70-130
Iron 838 100 1000 " ND 84 70-130
Manganese 790 20 1000 " ND 79 70-130
Zinc 777 50 1000 " ND 78 70-130
Matrix Spike (1804807-MS2) Source: 18F0488-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum 4620 50 5000 30.8 µg/L 92 70-130
Barium 802 100 1000 6.71 " 80 70-130
Boron 831 100 1000 12.5 " 82 70-130
Beryllium 805 1.0 1000 " ND 81 70-130
Chromium 840 10 1000 " ND 84 70-130
Copper 841 50 1000 " ND 84 70-130
Iron 885 100 1000 14.3 " 87 70-130
Manganese 882 20 1000 2.91 " 88 70-130
Zinc 842 50 1000 " ND 84 70-130
Batch 1804858 - EPA 200 Series
Blank (1804858-BLK1) Prepared: 06/13/18 Analyzed: 07/09/18 Antimony ND 4.0 µg/L
Arsenic ND 2.0 "
Cadmium ND 1.0 "
Lead ND 5.0 "
Nickel ND 10 "
Selenium ND 5.0 "
Silver ND 10 "
Vanadium ND 3.0 "
Thallium ND 1.0 "
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals (Dissolved) by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804858 - EPA 200 Series
LCS (1804858-BS1) Prepared: 06/13/18 Analyzed: 07/09/18 Antimony 96.5 4.0 100 µg/L 97 85-115
Arsenic 103 2.0 100 " 103 85-115
Cadmium 109 1.0 100 " 109 85-115
Lead 104 5.0 100 " 104 85-115
Nickel 106 10 100 " 106 85-115
Selenium 109 5.0 100 " 109 85-115
Silver 106 10 100 " 106 85-115
Vanadium 105 3.0 100 " 105 85-115
Thallium 105 1.0 100 " 105 85-115
LCS Dup (1804858-BSD1) Prepared: 06/13/18 Analyzed: 07/09/18 Antimony 95.5 4.0 100 µg/L 96 1 85-115 20
Matrix Spike (1804858-MS1) Source: 18F0573-06 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/13/18 Arsenic 153 2.0 100 1.23 µg/L 152 70-130 QM-7
Cadmium 103 1.0 100 0.360 " 103 70-130
Lead 98.3 5.0 100 0.280 " 98 70-130
Nickel 92.2 10 100 4.62 " 88 70-130
Selenium 179 5.0 100 5.24 " 174 70-130 QM-7
Silver 86.9 10 100 0.300 " 87 70-130
Vanadium 98.4 3.0 100 3.13 " 95 70-130
Thallium 102 1.0 100 1.31 " 101 70-130
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals (Drinking Water) by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804759 - EPA 200 Series
Blank (1804759-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Antimony ND 4.0 µg/L
Arsenic ND 2.0 "
Cadmium ND 1.0 "
Lead ND 5.0 "
Nickel ND 10 "
Selenium ND 5.0 "
Silver ND 10 "
Vanadium ND 3.0 "
Thallium ND 1.0 "
LCS (1804759-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Antimony 102 4.0 100 µg/L 102 85-115
Arsenic 108 2.0 100 " 108 85-115
Cadmium 111 1.0 100 " 111 85-115
Lead 107 5.0 100 " 107 85-115
Nickel 108 10 100 " 108 85-115
Selenium 110 5.0 100 " 110 85-115
Silver 94.3 10 100 " 94 85-115
Vanadium 106 3.0 100 " 106 85-115
Thallium 105 1.0 100 " 105 85-115
Matrix Spike (1804759-MS1) Source: 18F0246-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18 Antimony 97.8 4.0 100 µg/L ND 98 70-130
Arsenic 1350 2.0 100 1260 " 93 70-130
Cadmium 96.0 1.0 100 " ND 96 70-130
Lead 109 5.0 100 0.450 " 109 70-130
Nickel 82.5 10 100 2.95 " 80 70-130
Selenium 127 5.0 100 3.60 " 123 70-130
Silver 88.1 10 100 8.19 " 80 70-130
Vanadium 112 3.0 100 14.9 " 97 70-130
Thallium 106 1.0 100 0.140 " 106 70-130
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals (Drinking Water) by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804759 - EPA 200 Series
Matrix Spike (1804759-MS2) Source: 18F0291-01 Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18 Antimony 106 4.0 100 µg/L ND 106 70-130
Arsenic 117 2.0 100 3.66 " 113 70-130
Cadmium 114 1.0 100 " ND 114 70-130
Lead 112 5.0 100 0.300 " 112 70-130
Nickel 101 10 100 0.710 " 100 70-130
Selenium 117 5.0 100 " ND 117 70-130
Silver 88.9 10 100 " ND 89 70-130
Vanadium 104 3.0 100 1.28 " 103 70-130
Thallium 110 1.0 100 0.220 " 110 70-130
Batch 1804761 - EPA 200 Series
Blank (1804761-BLK1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum ND 50 µg/L
Barium ND 100 "
Boron ND 100 "
Beryllium ND 1.0 "
Chromium ND 10 "
Copper ND 50 "
Iron ND 100 "
Manganese ND 20 "
Zinc ND 50 "
LCS (1804761-BS1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum 5380 50 5000 µg/L 108 85-115
Barium 1050 100 1000 " 105 85-115
Boron 1010 100 1000 " 101 85-115
Beryllium 1090 1.0 1000 " 109 85-115
Chromium 1100 10 1000 " 110 85-115
Copper 1080 50 1000 " 108 85-115
Iron 1110 100 1000 " 111 85-115
Manganese 1110 20 1000 " 111 85-115
Zinc 1040 50 1000 " 104 85-115
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals (Drinking Water) by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804761 - EPA 200 Series
Matrix Spike (1804761-MS1) Source: 18F0405-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum 5650 50 5000 271 µg/L 108 70-130
Barium 1320 100 1000 305 " 101 70-130
Boron 1060 100 1000 56.5 " 101 70-130
Beryllium 1060 1.0 1000 " ND 106 70-130
Chromium 1040 10 1000 " ND 104 70-130
Copper 993 50 1000 " ND 99 70-130
Iron 1380 100 1000 252 " 113 70-130
Manganese 1070 20 1000 36.9 " 103 70-130
Zinc 1020 50 1000 24.7 " 100 70-130
Matrix Spike (1804761-MS2) Source: 18F0413-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/12/18 Aluminum 5070 50 5000 µg/L ND 101 70-130
Barium 1330 100 1000 363 " 97 70-130
Boron 1550 100 1000 607 " 94 70-130
Beryllium 1010 1.0 1000 " ND 101 70-130
Chromium 963 10 1000 " ND 96 70-130
Copper 932 50 1000 " ND 93 70-130
Iron 1430 100 1000 387 " 104 70-130
Manganese 1310 20 1000 333 " 98 70-130
Zinc 944 50 1000 10.2 " 93 70-130
Batch 1804802 - EPA 7470A
Blank (1804802-BLK1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury ND 1.0 µg/L
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Metals (Drinking Water) by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control Batch 1804802 - EPA 7470A
LCS (1804802-BS1) Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury 4.59 1.0 5.00 µg/L 92 85-115
Matrix Spike (1804802-MS1) Source: 18F0171-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury 4.62 1.0 5.00 µg/L ND 92 70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (1804802-MSD1) Source: 18F0171-01 Prepared: 06/11/18 Analyzed: 06/13/18 Mercury 4.71 1.0 5.00 µg/L ND 94 2 70-130 25
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Purgeable Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2 - Quality Control Batch 1804837 - EPA 5030 Water MS
Blank (1804837-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Benzene ND 0.50 µg/L
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0.50 "
Chlorobenzene ND 0.50 "
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.50 "
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.50 "
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.50 "
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.50 "
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 "
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 "
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.50 "
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.50 "
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 "
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.50 "
Ethylbenzene ND 0.50 "
Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 3.0 "
Methylene chloride ND 0.50 "
Styrene ND 0.50 "
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.50 "
Tetrachloroethene ND 0.50 "
Toluene ND 0.50 "
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.50 "
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.50 "
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.50 "
Trichloroethene ND 0.50 "
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 "
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon
113)
ND 10 "
Vinyl chloride ND 0.50 "
Xylenes (total) ND 0.50 "
Total Trihalomethanes (THM) ND 0.50 "
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 9.61 " 10.0 96 66-135
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 9.54 " 10.0 95 70-130
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Purgeable Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2 - Quality Control Batch 1804837 - EPA 5030 Water MS
Blank (1804837-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11.2 " 10.0 112 70-130
LCS (1804837-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Benzene 19.5 0.50 20.0 µg/L 98 70-130
Carbon tetrachloride 19.9 0.50 20.0 " 100 70-130
Chlorobenzene 19.8 0.50 20.0 " 99 70-130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 22.4 0.50 20.0 " 112 70-130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 22.8 0.50 20.0 " 114 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethane 18.5 0.50 20.0 " 92 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane 16.3 0.50 20.0 " 82 70-130
1,1-Dichloroethene 17.7 0.50 20.0 " 89 70-130
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.3 0.50 20.0 " 101 70-130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 18.7 0.50 20.0 " 94 70-130
1,2-Dichloropropane 19.3 0.50 20.0 " 96 70-130
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 21.0 0.50 20.0 " 105 70-130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 19.9 0.50 20.0 " 99 70-130
Ethylbenzene 20.1 0.50 20.0 " 101 70-130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 16.8 3.0 20.0 " 84 0-200
Methylene chloride 17.4 0.50 20.0 " 87 70-130
Styrene 21.2 0.50 20.0 " 106 70-130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 22.4 0.50 20.0 " 112 70-130
Tetrachloroethene 19.8 0.50 20.0 " 99 70-130
Toluene 20.1 0.50 20.0 " 101 70-130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 22.4 0.50 20.0 " 112 70-130
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 19.7 0.50 20.0 " 98 70-130
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 20.0 0.50 20.0 " 100 70-130
Trichloroethene 19.4 0.50 20.0 " 97 70-130
Trichlorofluoromethane 16.4 5.0 20.0 " 82 70-130
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon
113)
23.1 10 20.0 " 115 0-200
Vinyl chloride 16.7 0.50 20.0 " 84 60-140
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8.20 " 10.0 82 66-135
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Purgeable Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2 - Quality Control Batch 1804837 - EPA 5030 Water MS
LCS (1804837-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10.1 µg/L 10.0 101 70-130
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 12.2 " 10.0 122 70-130
LCS Dup (1804837-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Benzene 19.4 0.50 20.0 µg/L 97 0.7 70-130 30
Carbon tetrachloride 21.4 0.50 20.0 " 107 7 70-130 30
Chlorobenzene 19.7 0.50 20.0 " 98 0.6 70-130 30
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 20.6 0.50 20.0 " 103 8 70-130 30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 21.1 0.50 20.0 " 105 8 70-130 30
1,1-Dichloroethane 18.8 0.50 20.0 " 94 2 70-130 30
1,2-Dichloroethane 17.2 0.50 20.0 " 86 5 70-130 30
1,1-Dichloroethene 18.1 0.50 20.0 " 90 2 70-130 30
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.8 0.50 20.0 " 104 3 70-130 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 19.3 0.50 20.0 " 97 3 70-130 30 1,2-Dichloropropane 19.4 0.50 20.0 " 97 0.7 70-130 30
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 21.2 0.50 20.0 " 106 1 70-130 30 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 19.6 0.50 20.0 " 98 1 70-130 30 Ethylbenzene 19.6 0.50 20.0 " 98 3 70-130 30
Methyl tert-butyl ether 18.0 3.0 20.0 " 90 7 0-200 200
Methylene chloride 17.9 0.50 20.0 " 90 3 70-130 30
Styrene 21.0 0.50 20.0 " 105 1 70-130 30
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 22.9 0.50 20.0 " 114 2 70-130 30 Tetrachloroethene 19.4 0.50 20.0 " 97 2 70-130 30
Toluene 19.8 0.50 20.0 " 99 2 70-130 30
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 23.6 0.50 20.0 " 118 5 70-130 30 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 20.7 0.50 20.0 " 103 5 70-130 30
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 20.0 0.50 20.0 " 100 0.3 70-130 30 Trichloroethene 19.2 0.50 20.0 " 96 1 70-130 30
Trichlorofluoromethane 19.1 5.0 20.0 " 96 15 70-130 30
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon
113)
23.3 10 20.0 " 116 0.9 0-200 200
Vinyl chloride 19.2 0.50 20.0 " 96 14 60-140 30
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Analyte Limit Notes
Purgeable Organic Compounds by EPA Method 524.2 - Quality Control Batch 1804837 - EPA 5030 Water MS
LCS Dup (1804837-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 06/11/18
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 8.58 µg/L 10.0 86 66-135 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 9.87 " 10.0 99 70-130
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10.8 " 10.0 108 70-130
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Kleinfelder (Sacramento)
2882 Prospect Park Dr. suite 200
Riverview MHP
20190044
Joe Zilles
07/19/18 16:55
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
CLS Work Order #: 18F0405
COC #: 29380
Notes and Definitions
QM-7 The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD. The batch was accepted based on acceptable LCS/LCSD recovery.
QM-4X The spike recovery was outside of QC acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD due to analyte concentration at 4 times or greater the spike concentration. The QC batch was accepted based on LCS and/or LCSD recoveries within the acceptance limits.
QC-2H The recovery of one CCV was greater than the acceptance limit. However, all analytes in the associated samples were ND; therefore a reanalysis was not performed.
QB-2 The analyte was detected in the method blank or calibration verfication blank. A re-analysis was not performed since all sample results for the analyte are ND.
HT-F This is a field test method and it is performed in the lab outside holding time.
BT-1 Present
A-RES -0.16
Sample results reported on a dry weight basis
RPD Relative Percent Difference
dry
NR Not Reported
ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit (or method detection limit when specified) DET Analyte DETECTED
3249 Fitzgerald Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 | 800.638.7301 | Tel: 916.638.7301 x102 | Fax: 916.638.4510 | www.californialab.com
OrderID: 091812111
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Phone/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
CALI52
091812111
18F0405
EMSL Order ID:
Customer ID:
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attn:
Proj: 18F0405 - KB-01-133
Phone: (916) 638-7301
Fax: (916) 638-4510
Collected: 06/07/2018
Received: 06/08/2018
Analyzed: 06/21/2018
Mark Smith
California Laboratory Services
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Test Report: Determination of Asbestos Structures >10µm in Drinking Water Performed by the 100.2 Method (EPA 600/R-94/134)
Sample
Filtration
Date/Time
Sample ID
Client / EMSL
ASBESTOS
Confidence
Limits
Analytical Concentration
Sensitivity
Fibers
Detected
Asbestos
Types Area
Analyzed
(mm²)
Effective
Filter
Area
(mm²)
Original
Sample Vol.
Filtered
(ml) MFL (million fibers per liter)
6/8/2018
04:38 PM
KB-01-133 50 1312 0.1220
091812111-0001
ND 0.22 <0.22 0.00 - 0.79 None Detected
Test Report: TEM100.2-7.35.11 Printed: 6/21/2018 09:25AM Page 1 of 1 Analyst(s)
Matthew Batongbacal
Any questions please contact Matthew Batongbacal. or Other Approved Signatory Sample collection and containers provided by the client, acceptable bottle blank level is defined as 0.01MFL>10um. ND=None Detected. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission by EMSL Analytical, Inc. This report relates only to those items tested.Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc San Leandro, CA CA ELAP 1620, HI reciprocity, ID CA 01477, WA C884 Rui Cindy Geng (1)
Initial report from: 06/21/2018 09:25:27
Laboratory Report
for
CLS Labs
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Attention: CLS Data Reporting
Project Manager
Date of Issue
06/30/2018
EUROFINS EATON
ANALYTICAL, LLC
LXG: Linda Geddes
743612
ORGANICS
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100
Monrovia, California 91016-3629
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
* Accredited in accordance with TNI 2009 and ISO/IEC 17025:2005. * Laboratory certifies that the test results meet all TNI 2009 and ISO/IEC 17025:2005 requirements unless noted under the individual analysis. * Following the cover page are State Certification List, ISO 17025 Accredited Method List, Acknowledgement of Samples Received, Comments, Hits Report, Data Report, QC Summary, QC Report and Regulatory Forms, as applicable. * Test results relate only to the sample(s) tested.
STATE CERTIFICATION LIST
* NELAP/TNI Recognized Accreditation Bodies
State Certification Number State Certification Number
Alabama 41060 Mississippi Certified
Arizona AZ0778 Montana Cert 0035
Arkansas Certified Nebraska Certified
California-MonroviaELAP 2813 Nevada CA000062018
California-Colton- ELAP 2812 New Hampshire * 2959
Colorado Certified New Jersey * CA 008
Connecticut PH-0107 New Mexico Certified
Delaware CA 006 New York * 11320
Florida * E871024 North Carolina 06701
Georgia 947 North Dakota R-009
Guam 18-005R Oregon * CA200003-005
Hawaii Certified Pennsylvania * 68-565
Idaho Certified Puerto Rico Certified
Illinois * 200033 Rhode Island LAO00326
Indiana C-CA-01 South Carolina 87016
Iowa - Asbestos 413 South Dakota Certified
Kansas * E-10268 Tennessee TN02839
Kentucky 90107 Texas * T104704230-17-13
Louisiana * LA180000 Utah (Primary AB) * CA00006
Maine CA0006 Vermont VT0114
Maryland 224 Virginia * 460260
Commonwealth of
Northern Marianas Is. MP0004 Washington C838
Massachusetts M-CA006 EPA Region 5 Certified
Michigan 9906 Los Angeles County
Sanitation Districts 10264
ISO 17025 Accredited Method List
SPECIFIC TESTS
METHOD OR
TECHNIQUE USED
Environmental
(Drinking
Water)
Environmental
(Waste
Water)
Water as a
Component of
Food and
Bev/Bev/
Bottled Water
SPECIFIC TESTS
METHOD OR
TECHNIQUE USED
Environmental
(Drinking
Water)
Environmental
(Waste
Water)
Water as a
Component of
Food and Bev/Bev/
Bottled Water
1,4-Dioxane EPA 522 x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.7 x x 2,3,7,8-TCDD Modified EPA 1613B x x Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500-Cr B x Acrylamide In House Method (2440) x x Hormones EPA 539 x x Alkalinity SM 2320B x x x Hydroxide as OH Calc. SM 2330B x x Ammonia EPA 350.1 x x Kjeldahl Nitrogen EPA 351.2 x
Ammonia SM 4500-NH3 H x x Legionella CDC Legionella x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.0 x x x Mercury EPA 245.1 x x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.1 x x Metals EPA 200.7 / 200.8 x x x Asbestos EPA 100.2 x x Microcystin LR ELISA (2360) x x
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as
HCO3 SM 2320B x x x NDMA EPA 521 x x
BOD / CBOD SM 5210B x x NDMA TQ In house method based on EPA 521 (2425) x x
Bromate In House Method (2447) x x Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen EPA 353.2 x x x Carbamates EPA 531.2 x x OCL, Pesticides/PCB EPA 505 x x Carbonate as CO3 SM 2330B x x x Ortho Phosphate EPA 365.1 x x x Carbonyls EPA 556 x x Ortho Phosphate SM 4500P E x
COD EPA 410.4 / SM 5220D x Ortho Phosphorous SM 4500P E x Chloramines SM 4500-CL G x x x
Oxyhalides Disinfection
Byproducts
EPA 317.0 x x
Chlorinated Acids EPA 515.4 x x Perchlorate EPA 331.0 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 555 x x Perchlorate (low and high) EPA 314.0 x x Chlorine Dioxide SM 4500-CLO2 D x x Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids EPA 537 x x Chlorine -Total/Free/
Combined Residual
SM 4500-Cl G x x x pH EPA 150.1 x
Conductivity EPA 120.1 x pH SM 4500-H+B x x x
Conductivity SM 2510B x x x
Phenylurea Pesticides/
Herbicides
In House Method, based on EPA
532 (2448) x x
Corrosivity (Langelier Index) SM 2330B x x Pseudomonas IDEXX Pseudalert (2461) x x Cryptosporidium EPA 1623 x x Radium-226 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide, Amenable SM 4500-CN G x x Radium-228 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide, Free SM 4500CN F x x x Radon-222 SM 7500RN x x Cyanide, Total EPA 335.4 x x x Residue, Filterable SM 2540C x x x Cyanogen Chloride
(screen)
In House Method (2470) x x Residue, Non-filterable SM 2540D x Diquat and Paraquat EPA 549.2 x x Residue, Total SM 2540B x x DBP/HAA SM 6251B x x Residue, Volatile EPA 160.4 x
Dissolved Oxygen SM 4500-O G x x Semi-VOC EPA 525.2 x x DOC SM 5310C x x Semi-VOC EPA 625 x x
E. Coli (MTF/EC+MUG) x x Silica SM 4500-Si D x x
E. Coli CFR 141.21(f)(6)(i) x x Silica SM 4500-SiO2 C x x E. Coli SM 9223 x Sulfide SM 4500-S
=
D x
E. Coli (Enumeration) SM 9221B.1/ SM 9221F x x Sulfite SM 4500-SO 3B x x x
E. Coli (Enumeration) SM 9223B x x Surfactants SM 5540C x x x EDB/DCBP EPA 504.1 x Taste and Odor Analytes SM 6040E x x EDB/DBCP and DBP EPA 551.1 x x Total Coliform (P/A) SM 9221 A, B x x EDTA and NTA In House Method (2454) x x
Total Coliform
(Enumeration)
SM 9221 A, B, C x x
Endothall EPA 548.1 x x Total Coliform / E. coli Colisure SM 9223 x x Endothall In-house Method (2445) x x Total Coliform SM 9221B x Enterococci SM 9230B x x
Total Coliform with Chlorine
Present
SM 9221B x
Fecal Coliform SM 9221 E (MTF/EC) x
Total Coliform / E.coli (P/A
and Enumeration)
SM 9223 x x
Fecal Coliform SM 9221C, E (MTF/EC) x TOC SM 5310C x x x Fecal Coliform
(Enumeration)
SM 9221E (MTF/EC) x x TOX SM 5320B x
Fecal Coliform with
Chlorine Present
SM 9221E x Total Phenols EPA 420.1 x
Fecal Streptococci SM 9230B x x Total Phenols EPA 420.4 x x x Fluoride SM 4500-F C x x x Total Phosphorous SM 4500 P E x Giardia EPA 1623 x x Turbidity EPA 180.1 x x x
Glyphosate EPA 547 x x Turbidity SM 2130B x x
Gross Alpha/Beta EPA 900.0 x x x Uranium by ICP/MS EPA 200.8 x x Gross Alpha Coprecipitation SM 7110 C x x x UV 254 SM 5910B x Hardness SM 2340B x x x VOC EPA 524.2/EPA 524.3 x x
Heterotrophic Bacteria In House Method (2439) x x VOC EPA 624 x x Heterotrophic Bacteria SM 9215 B x x VOC EPA SW 846 8260 x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.6 x x x VOC In House Method (2411) x x Yeast and Mold SM 9610 x x
Version 002 Issued: 09/21/2016
The tests listed below are accredited and meet the requirements of ISO 17025 as verified by the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board/ANAB.
Refer to Certificate and scope of accreditation (AT 1807) found at: http://www.eatonanalytical.com 750 Royal Oaks Dr., Ste 100, Monrovia, CA 91016 Tel (626) 386-1100 Fax (626) 386-1101 http://www.EatonAnalytical.com
Acknowledgement of Samples Received
CLSLABS
743612
ORGANICS
500 Series
Client ID:
Folder #:
Project:
Sample Group:
Addr: CLS Labs
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Project Manager:
Phone:
PO #:
Linda Geddes
(626) 386-1163
18F0405
Attn:
Phone:
CLS Data Reporting
The following samples were received from you on June 12, 2018 at 1852. They have been scheduled for the tests listed below each sample. If this information is incorrect, please contact your service representative. Thank you for using Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC.
Sample # Sample ID Sample Date
201806130004 KB-01-133 06/07/2018 0950
Variable ID: 18F0405-01
@DIQUAT @ML515.4 @ML525
@ML531.2 2,3,7,8-TCDD Endothall
Glyphosate
@DIQUAT -- Diquat and Paraquat
@ML515.4 -- Chlorophenoxy Herbicides
@ML525 -- Semivolatiles by GCMS
@ML531.2 -- Aldicarbs
Test Description
Reported: 06/30/2018 Page 1 of 1
750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100, Monrovia, CA 91016 Tel (626) 386-1100 Fax (866) 988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton
Laboratory Comments
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
ORGANICS
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Analytical Results for Dioxins/Furans by 1613B are submitted by Eurofins Lancaster (525.2) The third internal standard and surrogate falied low due to matrix interference.
Associated compounds are flagged E6,S7 due to these failures.
L. Geddes 6/30/18
Folder Comments
Flags Legend:
E6 - Concentration estimated. Internal standard recoveries did not meet method acceptance criteria.
LE - MRL Check recovery was above laboratory acceptance limits.
LK - The associated blank spike recovery was above method acceptance limits. This target analyte was not detected in the sample.
S7 - Surrogate recovery was below laboratory and method acceptance limits. Unable to confirm matrix effect.
The Comments Report may be blank if there are no comments for this report. Comments - Page 1 of 1
Laboratory Hits
Samples Received on:
06/12/2018 1852
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
ORGANICS
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Analyzed Analyte Sample ID Result Federal MCL Units MRL SUMMARY OF POSITIVE DATA ONLY Hits Report - Page 1 of 1
Laboratory Data
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
Samples Received on:
06/12/2018 1852
743612
ORGANICS
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution KB-01-133 (201806130004) Sampled on 06/07/2018 0950
Variable ID: 18F0405-01
EPA 515.4 - Chlorophenoxy Herbicides
06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) 2,4,5-T ug/L 0.2 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) ug/L 0.2 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) 2,4-D ug/L 0.1 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) 2,4-DB ug/L 2 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid ug/L 0.5 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Acifluorfen ug/L 0.2 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Bentazon ug/L 0.5 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Dalapon ug/L 1 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Dicamba ug/L 0.1 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Dichlorprop ug/L 0.5 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Dinoseb ug/L 0.2 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Pentachlorophenol ug/L 0.04 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) Picloram ug/L 0.1 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) ug/L 0.1 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid 96 1 06/21/18 06/22/18 07:55 1100017 1100634 (EPA 515.4) 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl 101 1 EPA 525.2 - Semivolatiles by GCMS
06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Acenaphthylene ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Alachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Aldrin ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) alpha-Chlordane ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Anthracene ug/L 0.02 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Atrazine ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Benz(a)Anthracene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 0.02 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(b)Fluoranthene ug/L 0.02 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ug/L 0.02 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Bromacil ug/L 0.2 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Butachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Butylbenzylphthalate ug/L 0.5 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Caffeine by method 525mod ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Chrysene ug/L 0.02 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ug/L 0.6 1 Data Report - Page 1 of 3
Rounding on totals after summation.
(c) - indicates calculated results
Laboratory Data
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
Samples Received on:
06/12/2018 1852
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L 0.6 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Diazinon (Qualitative) ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Dieldrin ug/L 0.2 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Diethylphthalate ug/L 0.5 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Dimethoate ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Dimethylphthalate ug/L 0.5 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Di-n-Butylphthalate ug/L 1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Endrin ug/L 0.2 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Fluoranthene ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Fluorene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) gamma-Chlordane ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Heptachlor ug/L 0.04 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Hexachlorobenzene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Isophorone ug/L 0.5 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Lindane ug/L 0.04 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Methoxychlor ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Metolachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Metribuzin ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Molinate ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Phenanthrene ug/L 0.04 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Propachlor ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Pyrene ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Simazine ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Thiobencarb (ELAP) ug/L 0.2 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) ug/L 0.05 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Trifluralin ug/L 0.1 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene 97 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Acenaphthene-d10 53 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Chrysene-d12 41 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Perylene-d12 43 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Phenanthrene-d10 55 1 06/19/18 06/27/18 19:39 1099329 1101778 (EPA 525.2) Triphenylphosphate 119 1 EPA 548.1 - Endothall
06/13/18 06/15/18 13:44 1098029 1098688 (EPA 548.1) Endothall ug/L 20 4 Data Report - Page 2 of 3
Rounding on totals after summation.
(c) - indicates calculated results
Laboratory Data
CLS Labs
CLS Data Reporting
3249 Fitzgerald Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
Samples Received on:
06/12/2018 1852
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution EPA 547 - Glyphosate
06/15/18 0:04 1097955 (EPA 547) Glyphosate ug/L 6 1
EPA 531.2 - Aldicarbs
06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Aldicarb (Temik) ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Aldicarb sulfone ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Aldicarb sulfoxide ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Baygon ug/L 0.5 1
06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Carbaryl ug/L 0.5 1
06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Carbofuran (Furadan) ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Methiocarb ug/L 0.5 1 06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Methomyl ug/L 0.5 1
06/13/18 19:13 1097991 (EPA 531.2) Oxamyl (Vydate) ug/L 0.5 1 1097991
arbamate
06/13/18 19:13 (EPA 531.2) 103 1
EPA 549.2 - Diquat and Paraquat
06/13/18 06/13/18 21:45 1097748 1098019 (EPA 549.2) Diquat ug/L 0.4 1 06/13/18 06/13/18 21:45 1097748 1098019 (EPA 549.2) Paraquat ug/L 2 1 EPA 1613B - 2,3,7,8-TCDD
06/18/18 06/18/18 23:07 (EPA 1613B) 2,3,7,8-TCDD pg/L 5.3 1 Data Report - Page 3 of 3
Rounding on totals after summation.
(c) - indicates calculated results
Laboratory QC Summary
CLS Labs
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
ORGANICS
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Glyphosate
Analytical Batch: 1097955 Analysis Date: 06/15/2018
201806130004 KB-01-133 Analyzed by: XWO
Aldicarbs
Analytical Batch: 1097991 Analysis Date: 06/13/2018
201806130004 KB-01-133 Analyzed by: XWO
Diquat and Paraquat
Prep Batch: 1097748 Analytical Batch: 1098019 Analysis Date: 06/13/2018 201806130004 KB-01-133 Analyzed by: XWO
Endothall
Prep Batch: 1098029 Analytical Batch: 1098688 Analysis Date: 06/15/2018 201806130004 KB-01-133 Analyzed by: QMN6
Chlorophenoxy Herbicides
Prep Batch: 1100017 Analytical Batch: 1100634 Analysis Date: 06/22/2018 201806130004 KB-01-133 Analyzed by: A4H
Semivolatiles by GCMS
Prep Batch: 1099329 Analytical Batch: 1101778 Analysis Date: 06/27/2018 201806130004 KB-01-133 Analyzed by: JWC
QC Summary - Page 1 of 1
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Glyphosate by EPA 547
Analytical Batch: 1097955 Analysis Date: 06/14/2018
CCCH Glyphosate 25 22.6 ug/L 90 (80-120)
CCCM Glyphosate 10 9.14 ug/L 91 (80-120)
LCS1 Glyphosate 10 9.96 ug/L 100 (70-130)
MBLK Glyphosate ug/L
Glyphosate 6 6.72 ug/L 112 (50-150)
Glyphosate 10 9.89 ug/L 99 (70-130)
Glyphosate 10 10.0 ug/L 99 (70-130)
Glyphosate 10 9.95 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 0.59
Aldicarbs by EPA 531.2
Analytical Batch: 1097991 Analysis Date: 06/13/2018
CCCH 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 25 25.0 ug/L 100 (70-130)
CCCM 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 10 10.3 ug/L 103 (70-130)
LCS2 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 5 5.14 ug/L 103 (70-130)
MBLK 3-Hydroxycarbofuran ug/L
3-Hydroxycarbofuran 0.5 0.524 ug/L 105 (50-150)
3-Hydroxycarbofuran 5 5.37 ug/L 107 (70-130)
3-Hydroxycarbofuran 5 5.39 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 0.38
CCCH 97.6 98 (70-130)
CCCM 94.0 94 (70-130)
LCS2 101 101 (70-130)
MBLK 106 107 (70-130)
97.2 97 (70-130)
96.4 96 (70-130)
100 100 (70-130)
CCCH Aldicarb (Temik) 25 22.2 ug/L 89 (70-130)
CCCM Aldicarb (Temik) 10 9.37 ug/L 94 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldicarb (Temik) 5 4.72 ug/L 95 (70-130)
MBLK Aldicarb (Temik) ug/L
Aldicarb (Temik) 0.5 0.385 ug/L 77 (50-150)
Aldicarb (Temik) 5 5.33 ug/L 107 (70-130)
Aldicarb (Temik) 5 5.26 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 1.4
CCCH Aldicarb sulfone 25 24.5 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM Aldicarb sulfone 10 10.1 ug/L 101 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldicarb sulfone 5 5.46 ug/L 109 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 1 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
MBLK Aldicarb sulfone ug/L
Aldicarb sulfone 0.5 0.469 ug/L 94 (50-150)
Aldicarb sulfone 5 5.30 ug/L 106 (70-130)
Aldicarb sulfone 5 5.34 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 0.74
CCCH Aldicarb sulfoxide 25 23.4 ug/L 94 (70-130)
CCCM Aldicarb sulfoxide 10 9.81 ug/L 98 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldicarb sulfoxide 5 4.38 ug/L 88 (70-130)
MBLK Aldicarb sulfoxide ug/L
Aldicarb sulfoxide 0.5 0.559 ug/L 112 (50-150)
Aldicarb sulfoxide 5 5.29 ug/L 106 (70-130)
Aldicarb sulfoxide 5 5.26 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 0.62
CCCH Baygon 25 24.7 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCM Baygon 10 10.0 ug/L 100 (70-130)
LCS2 Baygon 5 5.00 ug/L 100 (70-130)
MBLK Baygon ug/L
Baygon 0.5 0.390 ug/L 78 (50-150)
Baygon 5 5.41 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Baygon 5 5.34 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 1.4
CCCH Carbaryl 25 25.0 ug/L 100 (70-130)
CCCM Carbaryl 10 10.2 ug/L 102 (70-130)
LCS2 Carbaryl 5 5.10 ug/L 102 (70-130)
MBLK Carbaryl ug/L
Carbaryl 0.5 0.538 ug/L 108 (50-150)
Carbaryl 5 5.16 ug/L 103 (70-130)
Carbaryl 5 5.27 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 2.0
CCCH Carbofuran (Furadan) 25 24.7 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCM Carbofuran (Furadan) 10 10.3 ug/L 103 (70-130)
LCS2 Carbofuran (Furadan) 5 5.32 ug/L 106 (70-130)
MBLK Carbofuran (Furadan) ug/L
Carbofuran (Furadan) 0.5 0.441 ug/L 88 (50-150)
Carbofuran (Furadan) 5 5.12 ug/L 102 (70-130)
Carbofuran (Furadan) 5 5.26 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 2.7
CCCH Methiocarb 25 24.5 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM Methiocarb 10 9.71 ug/L 97 (70-130)
LCS2 Methiocarb 5 4.95 ug/L 99 (70-130)
MBLK Methiocarb ug/L
Methiocarb 0.5 0.510 ug/L 102 (50-150)
Methiocarb 5 4.76 ug/L 95 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 2 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Methiocarb 5 5.14 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 7.7
CCCH Methomyl 25 22.7 ug/L 91 (70-130)
CCCM Methomyl 10 9.44 ug/L 94 (70-130)
LCS2 Methomyl 5 4.53 ug/L 91 (70-130)
MBLK Methomyl ug/L
Methomyl 0.5 0.519 ug/L 104 (50-150)
Methomyl 5 5.36 ug/L 107 (70-130)
Methomyl 5 5.34 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 0.33
CCCH Oxamyl (Vydate) 25 24.2 ug/L 97 (70-130)
CCCM Oxamyl (Vydate) 10 9.86 ug/L 99 (70-130)
LCS2 Oxamyl (Vydate) 5 4.89 ug/L 98 (70-130)
MBLK Oxamyl (Vydate) ug/L
Oxamyl (Vydate) 0.5 0.442 ug/L 88 (50-150)
Oxamyl (Vydate) 5 5.31 ug/L 106 (70-130)
Oxamyl (Vydate) 5 5.11 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 3.8
Diquat and Paraquat by EPA 549.2
Analytical Batch: 1098019 Analysis Date: 06/13/2018
CCCH Diquat 10 10.3 ug/L 103 (80-120)
CCCL Diquat 0.4 0.401 ug/L 100 (50-150)
CCCM Diquat 4 4.10 ug/L 103 (80-120)
LCS1 Diquat 5 4.14 ug/L 83 (70-130)
MBLK Diquat ug/L
Diquat 0.4 0.385 ug/L 96 (50-150)
Diquat 5 3.96 ug/L 79 (70-130)
Diquat 5 4.34 ug/L 87 (70-130)
Diquat 5 3.85 ug/L 77 (70-130) 20 2.9
CCCH Paraquat 10 11.4 ug/L 114 (80-120)
CCCL Paraquat 2 2.53 ug/L 126 (50-150)
CCCM Paraquat 4 4.76 ug/L 119 (80-120)
LCS1 Paraquat 5 4.88 ug/L 98 (70-130)
MBLK Paraquat ug/L
Paraquat 2 1.87 ug/L 93 (50-150)
Paraquat 5 4.71 ug/L 94 (70-130)
Paraquat 5 5.23 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Paraquat 5 4.78 ug/L 96 (70-130) 20 1.6
Endothall by EPA 548.1
Prep Batch: 1098029 Analytical Batch: 1098688 Analysis Date: 06/15/2018 QC Report - Page 3 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS1 Endothall 25 22.8 ug/L 91 (66-117)
MBLK Endothall ug/L
Endothall 5 5.83 ug/L 117 (50-150)
Endothall 25 23.9 ug/L 96 (66-117)
Endothall 25 23.3 ug/L 93 (66-117)
Endothall 25 22.8 ug/L 91 (66-117) 30 4.6
Chlorophenoxy Herbicides by EPA 515.4
Prep Batch: 1100017 Analytical Batch: 1100634 Analysis Date: 06/21/2018 CCC3 2,4,5-T 4 3.96 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4,5-T 4 4.00 ug/L 100 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4,5-T 1 0.942 ug/L 94 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4,5-T ug/L
2,4,5-T 0.2 0.257 ug/L 129 (50-150)
2,4,5-T 3 3.06 ug/L 102 (70-130)
2,4,5-T 3 3.08 ug/L 103 (70-130) 30 0.81
CCC3 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 4 3.87 ug/L 97 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 4 3.93 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 1 0.920 ug/L 92 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) ug/L
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.2 0.200 ug/L 100 (50-150)
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 3 2.81 ug/L 94 (70-130)
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 3 2.55 ug/L 85 (70-130) 30 9.7
CCC3 2,4-D 2 2.02 ug/L 101 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4-D 2 1.93 ug/L 97 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4-D 0.5 0.488 ug/L 98 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4-D ug/L
2,4-D 0.1 0.0781 ug/L 78 (50-150)
2,4-D 1.5 1.55 ug/L 103 (70-130)
2,4-D 1.5 1.54 ug/L 103 (70-130) 30 0.61
CCC3 2,4-DB 40 39.7 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCH 2,4-DB 40 40.5 ug/L 101 (70-130)
CCCM 2,4-DB 10 9.36 ug/L 94 (70-130)
MBLK 2,4-DB ug/L
2,4-DB 2 1.56 ug/L 78 (50-150)
2,4-DB 1 1.14 ug/L 114 (50-150)
2,4-DB 30 29.0 ug/L 97 (70-130)
2,4-DB 30 28.1 ug/L 94 (70-130) 30 3.4
QC Report - Page 4 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
CCC3 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 92.1 92 (70-130) CCCH 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 91.5 92 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 92.4 92 (70-130) MBLK 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 106 106 (70-130) 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 94.0 94 (70-130)
2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 98.6 99 (70-130)
2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 89.7 90 (70-130)
2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 93.6 94 (70-130)
CCC3 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 10 9.17 ug/L 92 (70-130)
CCCH 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 10 9.57 ug/L 96 (70-130)
CCCM 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 2.5 2.70 ug/L 108 (70-130) MBLK 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid ug/L
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 0.5 0.711 ug/L 142 (50-150)
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 7.5 7.84 ug/L 105 (70-130)
3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 7.5 7.49 ug/L 100 (70-130) 30 4.5 CCC3 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 99.2 99 (70-130) CCCH 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 97.5 98 (50-150) CCCM 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 107 107 (50-150) MBLK 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 104 104 (50-150) 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 106 106 (50-150)
4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 100 101 (50-150)
4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 105 105 (50-150)
4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 106 106 (50-150)
CCC3 Acifluorfen 4 4.07 ug/L 102 (70-130)
CCCH Acifluorfen 4 4.06 ug/L 102 (70-130)
CCCM Acifluorfen 1 1.08 ug/L 108 (70-130)
MBLK Acifluorfen ug/L
Acifluorfen 0.2 0.237 ug/L 118 (50-150)
Acifluorfen 3 2.96 ug/L 99 (70-130)
Acifluorfen 3 2.86 ug/L 95 (70-130) 30 3.1
CCC3 Bentazon 10 9.18 ug/L 92 (70-130)
CCCH Bentazon 10 9.25 ug/L 93 (70-130)
CCCM Bentazon 2.5 2.76 ug/L 110 (70-130)
MBLK Bentazon ug/L
Bentazon 0.5 0.549 ug/L 110 (50-150)
Bentazon 7.5 7.55 ug/L 97 (70-130)
Bentazon 7.5 7.69 ug/L 99 (70-130) 30 1.9
CCC3 Dalapon 20 19.8 ug/L 99 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 5 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
CCCH Dalapon 20 20.2 ug/L 101 (70-130)
CCCM Dalapon 5 5.55 ug/L 111 (70-130)
MBLK Dalapon ug/L
Dalapon 1 1.26 ug/L 126 (50-150)
Dalapon 15 16.0 ug/L 107 (70-130)
Dalapon 15 16.2 ug/L 108 (70-130) 30 1.0
CCC3 Dicamba 2 1.92 ug/L 96 (70-130)
CCCH Dicamba 2 1.94 ug/L 97 (70-130)
CCCM Dicamba 0.5 0.488 ug/L 98 (70-130)
MBLK Dicamba ug/L
Dicamba 0.1 0.148 ug/L 149 (50-150)
Dicamba 1.5 1.36 ug/L 91 (70-130)
Dicamba 1.5 1.30 ug/L 86 (70-130) 30 4.8
CCC3 Dichlorprop 10 9.41 ug/L 94 (70-130)
CCCH Dichlorprop 10 9.77 ug/L 98 (70-130)
CCCM Dichlorprop 2.5 2.41 ug/L 96 (70-130)
MBLK Dichlorprop ug/L
Dichlorprop 0.5 0.387 ug/L 77 (50-150)
Dichlorprop 7.5 6.63 ug/L 88 (70-130)
Dichlorprop 7.5 6.44 ug/L 86 (70-130) 30 2.7
CCC3 Dinoseb 4 3.94 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCH Dinoseb 4 3.96 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCM Dinoseb 1 1.01 ug/L 101 (70-130)
MBLK Dinoseb ug/L
Dinoseb 0.2 0.180 ug/L 90 (50-150)
Dinoseb 3 2.87 ug/L 96 (70-130)
Dinoseb 3 2.81 ug/L 94 (70-130) 30 2.3
CCC3 Pentachlorophenol 0.8 0.818 ug/L 102 (70-130)
CCCH Pentachlorophenol 0.8 0.792 ug/L 99 (70-130)
CCCM Pentachlorophenol 0.2 0.201 ug/L 101 (70-130)
MBLK Pentachlorophenol ug/L
Pentachlorophenol 0.04 0.0404 ug/L 101 (50-150)
Pentachlorophenol 0.6 0.558 ug/L 93 (70-130)
Pentachlorophenol 0.6 0.572 ug/L 95 (70-130) 30 2.5
CCC3 Picloram 2 1.86 ug/L 93 (70-130)
CCCH Picloram 2 1.86 ug/L 93 (70-130)
CCCM Picloram 0.5 0.542 ug/L 108 (70-130)
MBLK Picloram ug/L
QC Report - Page 6 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Picloram 0.1 0.139 ug/L 139 (50-150)
Picloram 1.5 1.59 ug/L 106 (70-130)
Picloram 1.5 1.58 ug/L 105 (70-130) 30 0.61
CCC3 2 2.05 ug/L 103 (70-130)
CCCH 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130)
CCCM 0.5 0.545 ug/L 109 (70-130)
MBLK ug/L
0.1 0.132 ug/L 132 (50-150)
1.5 1.48 ug/L 99 (70-130)
1.5 1.42 ug/L 94 (70-130) 30 4.2
Semivolatiles by GCMS by EPA 525.2
Prep Batch: 1099329 Analytical Batch: 1101556 Analysis Date: 06/27/2018 LCS1 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 96.8 97 (70-130) LCS2 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 95.6 96 (70-130) MBLK 1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 95.5 95 (70-130)
1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 94.4 94 (70-130)
1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 97.0 97 (70-130)
1,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 101 101 (70-130)
LCS1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.34 ug/L 117 (70-130) 20 6.2 MBLK 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.1 0.118 ug/L 118 (50-150)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2.49 ug/L 124 (70-130) 20 10
LCS1 Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 57.1 57 (50-150)
LCS2 Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 86.6 87 (50-150)
MBLK Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 68.6 69 (50-150)
Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 69.7 70 (50-150)
Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 69.8 70 (50-150)
Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 62.4 62 (50-150)
LCS1 Acenaphthylene 2 1.63 ug/L 82 (70-130)
LCS2 Acenaphthylene 2 1.81 ug/L 91 (70-130) 20 11
MBLK Acenaphthylene ug/L
Acenaphthylene 0.1 0.111 ug/L 111 (50-150)
Acenaphthylene 2 1.66 ug/L 83 (70-130)
Acenaphthylene 2 1.75 ug/L 88 (70-130) 20 5.2
LCS1 Alachlor 2 2.13 ug/L 106 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 7 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS2 Alachlor 2 2.08 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 2.4
MBLK Alachlor ug/L
Alachlor 0.05 0.0580 ug/L 116 (50-150)
Alachlor 2 2.06 ug/L 103 (70-130)
Alachlor 2 2.05 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 0.44
LCS1 Aldrin 2 1.73 ug/L 87 (70-130)
LCS2 Aldrin 2 1.90 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 9.4
MBLK Aldrin ug/L
Aldrin 0.05 0.0540 ug/L 108 (50-150)
Aldrin 2 1.80 ug/L 90 (70-130)
Aldrin 2 1.84 ug/L 92 (70-130) 20 2.1
LCS1 alpha-Chlordane 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130)
LCS2 alpha-Chlordane 2 1.97 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 1.5
MBLK alpha-Chlordane ug/L
alpha-Chlordane 0.05 0.0450 ug/L 90 (50-150)
alpha-Chlordane 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130)
alpha-Chlordane 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 0.15
LCS1 Anthracene 2 1.94 ug/L 97 (70-130)
LCS2 Anthracene 2 1.93 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 0.52
MBLK Anthracene ug/L
Anthracene 0.02 0.0160 ug/L 80 (50-150)
Anthracene 2 1.96 ug/L 98 (70-130)
Anthracene 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 1.9
LCS1 Atrazine 2 2.34 ug/L 117 (70-130)
LCS2 Atrazine 2 2.31 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 1.3
MBLK Atrazine ug/L
Atrazine 0.05 0.0480 ug/L 96 (50-150)
Atrazine 2 2.13 ug/L 106 (70-130)
Atrazine 2 2.35 ug/L 118 (70-130) 20 9.9
LCS1 Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.05 ug/L 102 (70-130)
LCS2 Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.13 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 3.8
MBLK Benz(a)Anthracene ug/L
Benz(a)Anthracene 0.05 0.0520 ug/L 104 (50-150)
Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.07 ug/L 103 (70-130)
Benz(a)Anthracene 2 2.11 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 2.1
LCS1 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.07 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 0.96
MBLK Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L
QC Report - Page 8 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.02 0.0200 ug/L 100 (50-150)
Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2.08 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.86
LCS1 Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 0.0 MBLK Benzo(b)Fluoranthene ug/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 0.02 0.0180 ug/L 90 (50-150)
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.25 ug/L 113 (70-130)
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 2 2.15 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 4.5
LCS1 Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.64 ug/L 132 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.66 ug/L 133 (70-130) 20 0.76 MBLK Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene ug/L
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 0.05 0.0730 ug/L 146 (50-150)
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.79 ug/L 140 (70-130)
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2 2.58 ug/L 129 (70-130) 20 7.9
LCS1 Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 1.8 MBLK Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ug/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 0.02 0.0140 ug/L 70 (50-150)
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.03 ug/L 101 (70-130)
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 8.2
LCS1 Bromacil 2 2.36 ug/L 118 (70-130)
LCS2 Bromacil 2 2.52 ug/L 126 (70-130) 20 6.1
MBLK Bromacil ug/L
Bromacil 0.1 0.0970 ug/L 97 (50-150)
Bromacil 2 2.30 ug/L 115 (70-130)
Bromacil 2 2.46 ug/L 123 (70-130) 20 6.6
LCS1 Butachlor 2 2.27 ug/L 113 (70-130)
LCS2 Butachlor 2 2.32 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 2.2
MBLK Butachlor ug/L
Butachlor 0.05 0.0700 ug/L 140 (50-150)
Butachlor 2 2.37 ug/L 119 (70-130)
Butachlor 2 2.46 ug/L 123 (70-130) 20 3.6
LCS1 Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130)
LCS2 Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.49 ug/L 124 (70-130) 20 9.7 MBLK Butylbenzylphthalate ug/L
Butylbenzylphthalate 0.15 0.171 ug/L 114 (50-150)
Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.23 ug/L 112 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 9 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Butylbenzylphthalate 2 2.40 ug/L 120 (70-130) 20 7.3
LCS1 Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.91 ug/L 95 (45-137)
LCS2 Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.82 ug/L 91 (45-137) 20 4.8 MBLK Caffeine by method 525mod ug/L
Caffeine by method 525mod 0.05 0.0430 ug/L 86 (50-150)
Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.83 ug/L 92 (46-144)
Caffeine by method 525mod 2 1.90 ug/L 95 (46-144) 20 3.6 LCS1 Chrysene 2 2.02 ug/L 101 (70-130)
LCS2 Chrysene 2 1.96 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 3.0
MBLK Chrysene ug/L
Chrysene 0.02 0.0210 ug/L 105 (50-150)
Chrysene 2 1.99 ug/L 100 (70-130)
Chrysene 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 2.3
LCS1 Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 64.3 64 (50-150)
LCS2 Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 102 102 (50-150)
MBLK Chrysene-d12 (I) 69.1 69 (50-150)
Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 73.6 74 (50-150)
Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 78.1 78 (50-150)
Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 72.7 73 (50-150)
LCS1 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.34 ug/L 117 (70-130)
LCS2 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.54 ug/L 127 (70-130) 20 8.2 MBLK Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ug/L
Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 0.3 0.316 ug/L 105 (50-150)
Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.33 ug/L 117 (70-130)
Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2.51 ug/L 126 (70-130) 20 7.4 LCS1 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.28 ug/L 114 (70-130) LCS2 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 0.88 MBLK Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L
Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.6 0.690 ug/L 115 (50-150)
Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.23 ug/L 111 (70-130)
Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2.44 ug/L 122 (70-130) 20 9.1 LCS1 Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.582 ug/L 29 (15-132)
LCS2 Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.606 ug/L 30 (15-132) 20 4.0 MBLK Diazinon (Qualitative) ug/L
Diazinon (Qualitative) 0.1 0.0310 ug/L 31 (15-132)
Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.656 ug/L 33 (15-132)
Diazinon (Qualitative) 2 0.663 ug/L 33 (15-132) 20 1.1
LCS1 Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.28 ug/L 114 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 10 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS2 Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.30 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 0.87 MBLK Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene ug/L
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 0.05 0.0700 ug/L 140 (50-150)
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.28 ug/L 114 (70-130)
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 1.1
LCS1 Dieldrin 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130)
LCS2 Dieldrin 2 2.13 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 1.4
MBLK Dieldrin ug/L
Dieldrin 0.1 0.142 ug/L 142 (50-150)
Dieldrin 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Dieldrin 2 2.23 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 6.0
LCS1 Diethylphthalate 2 2.27 ug/L 113 (70-130)
LCS2 Diethylphthalate 2 2.23 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 1.8
MBLK Diethylphthalate ug/L
Diethylphthalate 0.15 0.192 ug/L 128 (50-150)
Diethylphthalate 2 2.19 ug/L 109 (70-130)
Diethylphthalate 2 2.31 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 5.4
LCS1 Dimethoate 2 1.93 ug/L 96 (35-100)
LCS2 Dimethoate 2 1.80 ug/L 90 (35-100) 20 7.0
MBLK Dimethoate ug/L
Dimethoate 0.1 0.103 ug/L 103 (35-100)
Dimethoate 2 1.97 ug/L 98 (34-111)
Dimethoate 2 2.15 ug/L 107 (34-111) 20 8.9
LCS1 Dimethylphthalate 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 Dimethylphthalate 2 2.11 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 4.2
MBLK Dimethylphthalate ug/L
Dimethylphthalate 0.3 0.298 ug/L 99 (50-150)
Dimethylphthalate 2 2.12 ug/L 106 (70-130)
Dimethylphthalate 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 3.7
LCS1 Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.49 ug/L 112 (70-130)
LCS2 Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.56 ug/L 114 (70-130) 20 1.6 MBLK Di-n-Butylphthalate ug/L
Di-n-Butylphthalate 0.3 0.383 ug/L 128 (50-150)
Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.51 ug/L 113 (70-130)
Di-n-Butylphthalate 4 4.57 ug/L 114 (70-130) 20 1.2
LCS1 Endrin 2 2.21 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 Endrin 2 2.58 ug/L 129 (70-130) 20 15
MBLK Endrin ug/L
QC Report - Page 11 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Endrin 0.1 0.177 ug/L 177 (50-150)
Endrin 2 2.25 ug/L 113 (70-130)
Endrin 2 2.56 ug/L 128 (70-130) 20 13
LCS1 Fluoranthene 2 2.19 ug/L 109 (70-130)
LCS2 Fluoranthene 2 2.19 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 0.0
MBLK Fluoranthene ug/L
Fluoranthene 0.05 0.0500 ug/L 100 (50-150)
Fluoranthene 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Fluoranthene 2 2.15 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 0.37
LCS1 Fluorene 2 2.09 ug/L 104 (70-130)
LCS2 Fluorene 2 2.08 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.48
MBLK Fluorene ug/L
Fluorene 0.05 0.0520 ug/L 104 (50-150)
Fluorene 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Fluorene 2 2.21 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 5.3
LCS1 gamma-Chlordane 2 1.95 ug/L 98 (70-130)
LCS2 gamma-Chlordane 2 1.95 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 0.0
MBLK gamma-Chlordane ug/L
gamma-Chlordane 0.05 0.0470 ug/L 94 (50-150)
gamma-Chlordane 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130)
gamma-Chlordane 2 2.06 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 2.8
LCS1 Heptachlor 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 Heptachlor 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 0.0
MBLK Heptachlor ug/L
Heptachlor 0.04 0.0770 ug/L 193 (50-150)
Heptachlor 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130)
Heptachlor 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 2.9
LCS1 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130) LCS2 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 1.98 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 5.9 MBLK Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) ug/L
Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 0.05 0.0730 ug/L 146 (50-150) Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130)
Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.17 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 1.6 LCS1 Hexachlorobenzene 2 2.01 ug/L 101 (70-130)
LCS2 Hexachlorobenzene 2 1.97 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 2.0
MBLK Hexachlorobenzene ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 0.0500 ug/L 100 (50-150)
Hexachlorobenzene 2 2.03 ug/L 102 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 12 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Hexachlorobenzene 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 3.3
LCS1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 2.15 ug/L 107 (70-130) LCS2 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 2.12 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 1.4 MBLK Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.05 0.0410 ug/L 82 (50-150)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 2.09 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.096 LCS1 Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
LCS2 Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.29 ug/L 114 (70-130) 20 2.2 MBLK Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 0.05 0.0530 ug/L 106 (50-150)
Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.28 ug/L 114 (70-130)
Indeno(1,2,3,c,d)Pyrene 2 2.18 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 4.7 LCS1 Isophorone 2 2.03 ug/L 102 (70-130)
LCS2 Isophorone 2 1.99 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 2.0
MBLK Isophorone ug/L
Isophorone 0.1 0.0890 ug/L 89 (50-150)
Isophorone 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130)
Isophorone 2 2.15 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 5.1
LCS1 Lindane 2 2.41 ug/L 121 (70-130)
LCS2 Lindane 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130) 20 8.2
MBLK Lindane ug/L
Lindane 0.04 0.0560 ug/L 140 (50-150)
Lindane 2 2.36 ug/L 118 (70-130)
Lindane 2 2.47 ug/L 123 (70-130) 20 4.3
LCS1 Methoxychlor 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130)
LCS2 Methoxychlor 2 2.10 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 0.48
MBLK Methoxychlor ug/L
Methoxychlor 0.1 0.104 ug/L 104 (50-150)
Methoxychlor 2 2.15 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Methoxychlor 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 2.2
LCS1 Metolachlor 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130)
LCS2 Metolachlor 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 1.4
MBLK Metolachlor ug/L
Metolachlor 0.05 0.0550 ug/L 110 (50-150)
Metolachlor 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130)
Metolachlor 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 2.2
LCS1 Metribuzin 2 1.96 ug/L 98 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 13 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
LCS2 Metribuzin 2 1.91 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 2.6
MBLK Metribuzin ug/L
Metribuzin 0.05 0.0850 ug/L 170 (50-150)
Metribuzin 2 1.90 ug/L 95 (70-130)
Metribuzin 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 5.0
LCS1 Molinate 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
LCS2 Molinate 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 2.3
MBLK Molinate ug/L
Molinate 0.1 0.0960 ug/L 96 (50-150)
Molinate 2 2.25 ug/L 112 (70-130)
Molinate 2 2.38 ug/L 119 (70-130) 20 5.8
LCS1 Perylene-d12 (S) 5 100 100 (70-130)
LCS2 Perylene-d12 (S) 5 105 105 (70-130)
MBLK Perylene-d12 (S) 96.1 96 (70-130)
Perylene-d12 (S) 5 92.2 92 (70-130)
Perylene-d12 (S) 5 103 103 (70-130)
Perylene-d12 (S) 5 102 102 (70-130)
LCS1 Phenanthrene 2 2.03 ug/L 101 (70-130)
LCS2 Phenanthrene 2 2.01 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 0.99
MBLK Phenanthrene ug/L
Phenanthrene 0.02 0.0180 ug/L 90 (50-150)
Phenanthrene 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130)
Phenanthrene 2 2.06 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 1.2
LCS1 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 60.4 60 (50-150)
LCS2 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 92.5 93 (50-150)
MBLK Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 70.8 71 (50-150)
Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 74.5 75 (50-150)
Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 73.9 74 (50-150)
Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 68.9 69 (50-150)
LCS1 Propachlor 2 2.02 ug/L 101 (70-130)
LCS2 Propachlor 2 2.09 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 3.4
MBLK Propachlor ug/L
Propachlor 0.05 0.0340 ug/L 68 (50-150)
Propachlor 2 2.17 ug/L 109 (70-130)
Propachlor 2 2.30 ug/L 115 (70-130) 20 5.7
LCS1 Pyrene 2 2.14 ug/L 107 (70-130)
LCS2 Pyrene 2 2.17 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 1.4
MBLK Pyrene ug/L
QC Report - Page 14 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
Laboratory QC
CLS Labs
QC Type Analyte Spiked Recovered Units
Tel: (626) 386-1100
Fax: (866) 988-3757
1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227)
743612
500 Series
Report:
Project:
Group:
Pyrene 0.05 0.0490 ug/L 98 (50-150)
Pyrene 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130)
Pyrene 2 2.16 ug/L 108 (70-130) 20 0.14
LCS1 Simazine 2 2.22 ug/L 111 (70-130)
LCS2 Simazine 2 2.20 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 0.91
MBLK Simazine ug/L
Simazine 0.05 0.0720 ug/L 144 (50-150)
Simazine 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
Simazine 2 2.51 ug/L 125 (70-130) 20 11
LCS1 Thiobencarb 2 2.36 ug/L 118 (70-130)
LCS2 Thiobencarb 2 2.33 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 1.3
MBLK Thiobencarb ug/L
Thiobencarb 0.1 0.100 ug/L 100 (50-150)
Thiobencarb 2 2.29 ug/L 115 (70-130)
Thiobencarb 2 2.32 ug/L 116 (70-130) 20 1.2
LCS1 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130)
LCS2 2 1.95 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 4.5
MBLK ug/L
0.05 0.0550 ug/L 110 (50-150)
2 1.97 ug/L 99 (70-130)
2 2.07 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 4.8
LCS1 Trifluralin 2 2.19 ug/L 109 (70-130)
LCS2 Trifluralin 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130) 20 2.3
MBLK Trifluralin ug/L
Trifluralin 0.1 0.0810 ug/L 81 (50-150)
Trifluralin 2 2.24 ug/L 112 (70-130)
Trifluralin 2 2.35 ug/L 118 (70-130) 20 4.8
LCS1 Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 114 114 (70-130)
LCS2 Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 117 117 (70-130)
MBLK Triphenylphosphate (S) 116 116 (70-130)
Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 109 109 (70-130)
Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 111 111 (70-130)
Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 110 110 (70-130)
QC Report - Page 15 of 15
Spike recovery is already corrected for native results.
Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining.
Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method.
RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used.
RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound.
(I) - Indicates internal standard compound.
ANALYSIS REPORT
Prepared by:
Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental
2425 New Holland Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
Prepared for:
Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc
Suite 100
750 Royal Oaks Drive
Monrovia CA 91016
Report Date: June 24, 2018 12:12
Project: 743612
Account #: 14482
Group Number: 1956071
PO Number: 99-59417
State of Sample Origin: CA
Regulatory agencies do not accredit laboratories for all methods, analytes, and matrices. Our current scopes of accreditation can be viewed at http://www.eurofinsus.com/environmenttesting/laboratories/eurofins-lancaster-laboratories-environmental/resources/certifications/ . To request copies of prior scopes of accreditation, contact your project manager.
Electronic Copy To Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc Attn: EEAI Reports Respectfully Submitted,
(717) 556-7383
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Client Sample Description Sample Collection
Date/Time
ELLE#
KB-01-133 Potable Water 06/07/2018 09:50 9663701
The specific methodologies used in obtaining the enclosed analytical results are indicated on the Laboratory Sample Analysis Record.
Project Name: 743612
ELLE Group #: 1956071
General Comments:
See the Laboratory Sample Analysis Record section of the Analysis Report for the method references.
All QC met criteria unless otherwise noted in an Analysis Specific Comment below.
Refer to the QC Summary for specific values and acceptance criteria.
Project specific QC samples are not included in this data set.
Matrix QC may not be reported if site-specific QC samples were not submitted. In these situations, to demonstrate precision and accuracy at a batch level, a LCS/LCSD was performed, unless otherwise specified in the method.
Surrogate recoveries (if applicable) which are outside of the QC window are confirmed unless attributed to a dilution or otherwise noted in an Analysis Specific Comment below.
The samples were received at the appropriate temperature and in accordance with the chain of custody unless otherwise noted.
Analysis Specific Comments:
No additional comments are necessary.
Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc
ELLE Sample #:PW 9663701
ELLE Group #: 1956071
Matrix: Potable Water
Sample Description: KB-01-133 Potable Water
Folder# 743612 Sub PO# 99-59417 Job# 1000014
Project Name: 743612
Collection Date/Time: 06/07/2018 09:50
Submittal Date/Time: 06/16/2018 10:10
MRL
EDL* A Result nalysis Name CAS Number
Dilution
Factor
CAT
No.
EPA 1613B Oc pg/l pg/l pg/l Dioxins/Furans tober 1994
12935 2378-TCDD 1746-01-6 N.D. 0.432 5.35 1
Labeled Compounds %Rec Windows
13C12-2378-TCDD 56 25 - 164
Dioxins/Furans Data Qualifiers:
B Detected in Method Blank
U Undetected
J Estimated concentration between Estimated Detection Limit and Minimum Reporting Level E Exceeds calibration range
C Confirmed quantitation on secondary GC column
Q EMPC - Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration
F Interference is present
S Saturation of detection signal
Sample Comments
CA ELAP Lab Certification No. 2792
All QC is compliant unless otherwise noted. Please refer to the Quality Control Summary for overall QC performance data and associated samples.
Laboratory Sample Analysis Record
Analyst Dilution
Factor
Trial# Batch# Analysis
Date and Time
CAT
No.
Analysis Name Method
12935 2378-TCDD in Potable Water EPA 1613B October
1994
1 18169001 06/18/2018 23:07 Joseph D Anderson 1
10914 Dioxins/Furans in Water - SepF EPA 1613B October
1994
1 18169001 06/18/2018 08:15 Alex L Barton 1
EDL = Estimated Detection Limit
*=This limit was used in the evaluation of the final result
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc Group Number: 1956071 Reported: 06/24/2018 12:12
Matrix QC may not be reported if insufficient sample or site-specific QC samples were not submitted. In these situations, to demonstrate precision and accuracy at a batch level, a LCS/LCSD was performed, unless otherwise specified in the method.
All Inorganic Initial Calibration and Continuing Calibration Blanks met acceptable method criteria unless otherwise noted on the Analysis Report.
Method Blank
Analysis Name Result EDL** MRL
pg/l pg/l pg/l
Batch number: 18169001 Sample number(s): 9663701
2378-TCDD N.D. 0.179 5.00
OPR/OPRD
RPD
Max
OPR/OPRD
Limits
OPRD
%REC
OPR
%REC
OPRD
Conc
OPRD Spike
Added
OPR
Conc
OPR Spike
Added
Analysis Name RPD
pg/l pg/l pg/l pg/l
Batch number: 18169001 Sample number(s): 9663701
2378-TCDD 2.00 2.95 147 67-158
Surrogate recoveries which are outside of the QC window are confirmed unless attributed to dilution or otherwise noted on the Analysis Report.
Surrogate Quality Control
Analysis Name: 2378-TCDD in Potable Water
Batch number: 18169001
13C12-2378-TCDD
9663701 56
Blank 48
13C12-2378-TCDD
Limits: 25-164
13C12-2378-TCDD
OPR 20
13C12-2378-TCDD
Limits: 20-175
*- Outside of specification
**-This limit was used in the evaluation of the final result for the blank (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the MRL. (2) The unspiked result was more than four times the spike added.
P###### is indicative of a Background or Unspiked sample that is batch matrix QC and was not performed using a sample from this submission group.
Explanation of Symbols and Abbreviations
3768 0717
The following defines common symbols and abbreviations used in reporting technical data:
BMQL Below Minimum Quantitation Level
C degrees Celsius
cfu colony forming units
CP Units cobalt-chloroplatinate units
F degrees Fahrenheit
g gram(s)
IU International Units
kg kilogram(s)
L liter(s)
lb. pound(s)
m3 cubic meter(s)
meq milliequivalents
mg milligram(s)
mL milliliter(s)
MPN Most Probable Number
N.D. non-detect
ng nanogram(s)
NTU nephelometric turbidity units
pg/L picogram/liter
RL Reporting Limit
TNTC Too Numerous To Count
µg microgram(s)
µL microliter(s)
umhos/cm micromhos/cm
< less than
> greater than
ppm parts per million - One ppm is equivalent to one milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) or one gram per million grams. For aqueous liquids, ppm is usually taken to be equivalent to milligrams per liter (mg/l), because one liter of water has a weight very close to a kilogram. For gases or vapors, one ppm is equivalent to one microliter per liter of gas. ppb parts per billion
Dry weight Results printed under this heading have been adjusted for moisture content. This increases the analyte weight basis concentration to approximate the value present in a similar sample without moisture. All other results are reported on an as-received basis.
Analytical test results meet all requirements of the associated regulatory program (i.e., NELAC (TNI), DoD, and ISO 17025) unless otherwise noted under the individual analysis.
Measurement uncertainty values, as applicable, are available upon request.
Tests results relate only to the sample tested. Clients should be aware that a critical step in a chemical or microbiological analysis is the collection of the sample. Unless the sample analyzed is truly representative of the bulk of material involved, the test results will be meaningless. If you have questions regarding the proper techniques of collecting samples, please contact us. We cannot be held responsible for sample integrity, however, unless sampling has been performed by a member of our staff.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
Times are local to the area of activity. Parameters listed in the 40 CFR Part 136 Table II as “analyze immediately” are not performed within 15 minutes.
WARRANTY AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY - In accepting analytical work, we warrant the accuracy of test results for the sample as submitted.
THE FOREGOING EXPRESS WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IS GIVEN IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. WE DISCLAIM ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING A WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY. IN NO EVENT SHALL EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES
ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFIT OR GOODWILL REGARDLESS OF (A) THE NEGLIGENCE (EITHER SOLE OR
CONCURRENT) OF EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES ENVIRONMENTAL AND (B) WHETHER EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES ENVIRONMENTAL HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. No purchase order or other order for work shall be accepted by Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental which includes any conditions that vary from the Standard Terms and Conditions, and Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental hereby objects to any conflicting terms contained in any acceptance or order submitted by client.
Data Qualifiers
Qualifier Definition
C Result confirmed by reanalysis
D1 Indicates for dual column analyses that the result is reported from column 1 D2 Indicates for dual column analyses that the result is reported from column 2 E Concentration exceeds the calibration range
K1 Initial Calibration Blank is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND K2 Continuing Calibration Blank is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND K3 Initial Calibration Verification is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND K4 Continuing Calibration Verification is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND J (or G, I, X) Estimated value >= the Method Detection Limit (MDL or DL) and < the Limit of Quantitation (LOQ or RL) P Concentration difference between the primary and confirmation column >40%. The lower result is reported.
U Analyte was not detected at the value indicated
V Concentration difference between the primary and confirmation column >100%. The reporting limit is raised due to this disparity and evident interference.
W The dissolved oxygen uptake for the unseeded blank is greater than 0.20 mg/L.
Z Laboratory Defined - see analysis report
Additional Organic and Inorganic CLP qualifiers may be used with Form 1 reports as defined by the CLP methods.
Qualifiers specific to Dioxin/Furans and PCB Congeners are detailed on the individual Analysis Report.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Feasibility Study Report
April 2021
C
Appendix C
Compliance Order
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Feasibility Study Report
April 2021
D
Appendix D
Summary of Source Water Quality
…
MCL MCL
2 Date Result Date Result Date Result Date Result
mg/L ND ND 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 ND 6/6/2018 ND Varies / 12/5/2017 ND 12/5/2017 ND 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 ND 6/6/2018 ND Varies / mg/L 10/6/2017 12 6/7/2018 12.1 6/6/2018 12.4 / /
mg/L 2/14/2017 357.4 2/14/2017 388.1 7/12/2017 317.7 10/6/2017 260 6/7/2018 340 6/6/2018 290 / / mg/L 2/14/2017 100 2/14/2017 89.8 7/12/2017 79.5 10/6/2017 55 6/7/2018 65 6/6/2018 80 / / mg/L 2/14/2017 35.5 2/14/2017 17.4 7/12/2017 46.6 10/6/2017 44 6/7/2018 24 6/6/2018 45 / 500 mg/L 2/14/2017 309.4 2/14/2017 322.1 7/12/2017 279.4 10/6/2017 250 6/7/2018 280 6/6/2018 300 / / mg/L 9/26/2006 0.5 10/6/2017 0.5 6/7/2018 -0.16 6/6/2018 0.14 / / mg/L 7/2/2018 9.5 7/2/2018 8.2 7/12/2017 8 10/6/2017 7 6/7/2018 8.4 6/6/2018 6.7 10 / / 2/14/2017 7.7 2/14/2017 7.7 7/12/2017 7.4 10/6/2017 7.9 6/7/2018 7.33 6/6/2018 7.62 / / mg/L 2/14/2017 47.4 2/14/2017 46 7/12/2017 48.7 10/6/2017 47 6/7/2018 79 6/6/2018 44 / 500 mg/L 2/14/2017 292.2 2/14/2017 318.2 7/12/2017 260.4 10/6/2017 260 6/7/2018 340 6/6/2018 290 / / mg/L 2/14/2017 504 2/14/2017 449 7/12/2017 560 10/6/2017 450 6/7/2018 580 6/6/2018 440 / 1000 µg/L 4/3/2018 ND 4/3/2018 ND 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 ND 6/6/2018 ND 0.2/0.05 / pCi/L 8/15/2018 19.2 ± 3.86 8/15/2018 34.2 ± 5.99 7/12/2017 17.1 ± 0.651 10/6/2017 18.6 ± 0.678 6/7/2018 51.4 ± 5.77 6/6/2018 14.6 ± 2.99 15 / pCi/L 8/15/2018 19 8/15/2018 26 7/12/2017 14 10/6/2017 16 20 / pCi/L 6/7/2018 48 6/6/2018
pCi/L 6/7/2018 53 6/6/2018 ND 20 /
µg/L 8/15/2018 29.9 ± 3.63 8/15/2018 37.9 ± 4.06 6/7/2018 38.9 ± 5.01 6/6/2018 15.3 ± 3.22 20 / pCi/L 3/9/2015 ND 11/16/2018 0.063 7/12/2017 1.95 ± 0.65 10/6/2017 9.79 ± 1.61 6/7/2018 0.333 ± 0.786 6/6/2018 0.275 ± 1.028 5 / 6/7/2018 ND 6/6/2018 490
µg/L 9/5/2017 1300 7/10/2017 ND 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 270 6/6/2018 300 1000 200 µg/L 6/7/2018 4.5 6/6/2018 3.3
µg/L 9/5/2017 ND 7/10/2017 ND 7/12/2017 4.7 10/6/2017 5.4 6/7/2018 3.7 6/6/2018 4.6 10 / µg/L 9/5/2017 200 7/10/2017 210 7/12/2017 300 10/6/2017 310 6/7/2018 310 6/6/2018 340 1000 / µg/L 8/8/2003 ND / / 6/7/2018 ND 6/6/2018 180 / /
µg/L 2/14/2017 2700 2/14/2017 ND 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 250 6/6/2018 290 / 300 µg/L 2/14/2017 56 2/14/2017 ND 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 37 6/6/2018 20 / 50 µg/L 8/8/2003 19 / / 6/7/2018 22 6/6/2018 13 / /
MPN/1000ML 1/31/2017 ND 10/24/201 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 Present 6/6/2018 Absent <1 <1 MPN/1000ML 9/19/2017 ND 10/27/2016 ND 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 Present 6/6/2018 Present <1 <1 MFL>10um 7/12/2017 ND 10/6/2017 ND 6/7/2018 ND 6/6/2018 ND 7 / Iron had been historically ND in the South Well.
Chlorinated Pesticides & PCBS (14)
TOTAL Vanadium
E. Coli
Purgeable Organic Compounds (29)
Uranium (FWL Report)
DISSOLVED Arsenic
Nitrate (as N)
Langlier Index
Hardness (as CaCO3)
Chloride
Calcium
Bicarbonate (as CaCO3)
Uranium (CLS Report)
DBCP/EDB
TDS
Southwest Well
DISSOLVED Aluminum
Uranium (FGL Report)
TOTAL Manganese
TOTAL Iron
TOTAL Boron
TOTAL Barium
TOTAL Arsenic
TOTAL Aluminum
Total Alkalinity
Sulfate (as SO4)
pH
Combined Radium (226 + 228)
Uranium (CLS Report, "CWT")
Gross Alpha
Aggressive Index
Riverview Mobile Estates: Summary of Source Water Quality Asbestos
Total Coliform
Test Bore
150' - 170' Pump Depth 240'-260' Pump Depth 120' - 149' Zone Test 250' - 271' Zone Test Analyte Name UNIT Date Result Date Result
South Well North PVC Well
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Feasibility Study Report
April 2021
E
Appendix E
Groundwater Treatment Facility Proposals
MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786
© 2019 Kleinfelder
KLEINFELDER 2882 Prospect Park Dr., Suite 200, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 p | 916.366-1701 f | 916.366-7013 September 27, 2019
Proposal No.: MP200607.001P
William Ebert
Alliance Manufactured Homes, Inc.
2967 Daylight Way
San Jose, California 95111
Via Email: [email protected]
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL
GROUNDWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES
8200 JANTZEN ROAD
STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr. Ebert:
Kleinfelder understands the Alliance Manufactured Homes, Inc. intends to retain a qualified consultant to provide engineering services for design of the groundwater treatment facility which will be constructed to remove uranium radioactivity from the groundwater at the Riverview Mobile Home Estates (RMHE) located at 8200 Jantzen Road, Stanislaus County. Kleinfelder is highly qualified for the requested services, and our proposal shows that Kleinfelder is the consultant of choice by offering the following benefits:
• An approach that provides the facility design that will reliably and cost efficiently remove the uranium radioactivity form the source water
• Strong expertise and extensive experience dealing with ion exchange (IX) technologies • Project Manager, Sava Nedic, PE, PMP BCEE with a track-record of successful completing similar treatment facility projects
Kleinfelder is proposing to complete the Groundwater Treatment Facility design as specified by the requested scope of work for an engineering fee of $77,865 and within the proposed schedule of six month. We are committed to completing your project on time and within the proposed budget. We look forward to the opportunity to serving the Alliance Manufactured Homes and the RMHE on this important project.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (916) 366-1701, or our proposed Project Manager Mr. Sava Nedic at (949) 233-6871.
Respectfully submitted,
KLEINFELDER, INC.
Joseph D. Zilles, P.G. No. 7787
Sr. Principal Hydrogeologist,
Principal in Charge
MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 1 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
SCOPE OF WORK
___________________________________________________________________________________
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Prepared in accordance with the Request for Proposal (RFP), this proposal demonstrates Kleinfelder is the right firm to provide expert engineering services for the Groundwater Treatment Facility. Mr. Sava Nedic, PE, PMP, BCEE, Project Manager, will lead our project team in preparing an accurate, efficient treatment system design, particular to the needs of the RMHE.
Method to Accomplish the Work
Kleinfelder has developed the method to accomplish the work based on the RFP specified scope of work (SOW) and our team’s expertise. The proposed method to accomplish the work has been prepared for the entire project including the existing well pump reconfiguration, new IX system to remove uranium from the well water, chlorine disinfection system rehabilitation and upgrades, storage reservoir rehabilitation and upgrades, and new water distribution system pumps station.
Selection of an appropriate resin for a specifically targeted water contaminant is critical for the successful and cost-efficient operation of the facility.
Fee Proposal Estimate and Anticipated Schedule
The Kleinfelder proposed fee to providing professional engineering services for the Well Water Treatment Facility deign project is $76,701. The proposed fee is based on the RFP proposed Scope of Services and is prepared using the Kleinfelder standard hourly rates typical for this project type. Kleinfelder is proposing to complete the final design documents that will be ready for bidding for a time period of six calendar months.
Other Information
Kleinfelder’s proven history of design and implementation of groundwater treatment projects is demonstrated throughout this section. From selection of the best ion exchange (IX) resin for this application, detailed design, project management and quality control and assurance, Kleinfelder will consider all appropriate elements for project execution including long-term operations and maintenance requirements. Utilizing key experience such as the City of Highland Plant 150 Testing and Design Project, Mr. Nedic will provide expert design for your IX treatment facility to remove uranium radioactivity. For the Coronado Pump Station and Force Main Project, Kleinfelder led the accelerated schedule through all facets of the required CEQA permitting including alignment with multiple stakeholders and regulatory bodies. The accelerated permitting process allowed the project to proceed on-time and on-budget.
ORGANIZATION CHART AND STAFFING RESOURCES
Kleinfelder is proposing a project team of specialists with extensive experience with Ion Exchange technologies and delivering high-quality design documents for many water treatment plants ontime and within the authorized budget. As presented in the organization chart, our project team is MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 2 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
organized to provide effective project management and logical execution of the RFP proposed Scope of Services.
Riverview MHE
Bill Ebert
PIC
Joe Zilles*
Kleinfelder PM
Sava Nedic*
TRC
Larry VandeVenter*
Resin Selection Design and Bidding Support
Sava Nedic* Art Garcia*
Edvard Tyler Process Mechanical Electrical
Trevor Shackelford
Arturo Garcia
Bryan Webb Ron Erne
Civil I&C
Bob Ojeda Ron Erne
* Key Position Structural
Design &Bidding
Support
Christina Nishimoto Katherine Laird
PIC - Principal in Charge, PM – Project Manager, TRC – Technical Review Committee The organization chart designates key professionals with an asterisk (*).
The team supporting Mr. Nedic is comprised of regional and local experts. A brief description of each lead is presented below followed by resumes of each team member.
Mr. Sava Nedic, PE, PMP, BCEE, Project Manager, will lead this dedicated team of well treatment experts and experienced design staff to deliver on the treatment plant scope of services. Mr. Nedic has an extensive experience in designing water treatment facilities including projects employing ion exchange (IX) technologies which is key for the IX resin selection task. Mr.
Nedic’s expertise in water resources, conveyance and wastewater treatment and water quality control processes including ion exchange technologies will provide expert leadership. He is proficient with the management of engineering tasks and will deliver the City a high-quality design on- time and within agreed on budget.
The Technical Review of deliverable documents will be performed by an industry veteran, Larry VandeVenter. Mr. VandeVenter provides 36 years of expert water treatment project development and feasibility studies. Mr. Edward Tyler with more than 29 years of experience specializing in biological and chemical in-situ and ex-situ water treatment processes including ion exchange technologies will provide an important support for IX resin selection. Mr. Arturo Garcia, lead for MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 3 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
the preliminary and final design, is skillful in municipal water and infrastructure projects. Mr. Garcia has a strong technical background, experience developing plans and specifications for water and wastewater treatment facilities and is proficient performing civil/mechanical/hydraulic engineering calculations and analysis, equipment selection, and cost estimating.
Brief Resumes
Brief resumes for the team proposed for the project are included below (alphabetically by last name).
Ron K. Erne, PE Electrical, Instrumentation, & Controls Design Kleinfelder BS, Electrical Engineering | Professional Engineer – California Mr. Erne has 46 years of experience in various major applied areas of electrical engineering/design including the initial 12 years with two major electrical utility companies, involving medium and high voltage systems operation and main transmission distribution substation and power generation. These initial projects consisted of direct hands-on involvement regarding Main system operations and detailed design, procurement and commissioning of several 25kV to 240kV electrical substations within the main Alberta grid system. The latter 6 years six years was spent in the detailed EPC phases regarding a thermoelectric Power generation utility. This involved positions from a Senior Engineer to an overall Lead Engineer responsibility regarding Two 200 MW Steam Turbine Gas Fired Generation units and front end Engineering for one 400 MW Steam Turbine Coal fired Generation Unit. During this period considerable time was also spent (approximately 20 months) as Chief Commissioning Engineer involving detailed checkout, testing and initial operation of all mechanical, electrical and control systems associated with the two steam turbine gas fired boiler thermoelectric generation units. The latter thirty-four years has been spent as a Lead Electrical Engineer, responsibility involving several large petrochemical processing plant EPC projects in the range of $50M to $6000M within and outside Canada.
Arturo Garcia, PE - Design Lead Kleinfelder
BS, Civil Engineering, ME Environmental Engineering| Professional Engineer-Civil, California Arturo Garcia, PE is a project engineer with over 8 years of experience specializing in water and wastewater infrastructure design. Mr. Garcia is experienced in the design of piping systems in treatment plant and distribution systems. He is responsible for detailed design and layout, civil/mechanical calculations and hydraulic analysis, equipment selection, cost estimation, and development of plans and specifications.
Katherine Laird, PE, Design & Bidding Support Engineering OOCC Kleinfelder BS, Environmental Engineering | EIT - California
Ms. Laird is an environmental engineer and has seven years of experience in the fields of environmental engineering and compliance, including conducting multimedia compliance audits; Construction General Permit (CGP) and Industrial General Permit (IGP) stormwater compliance; stormwater Best Management Practice (BMP) design; preparation of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs); aboveground storage tank/underground storage tank compliance and preparation of SPCC Plans; industrial wastewater compliance and reporting. She has experience with environmental engineering principles including analysis and design (mass balance, hydraulic/solids loading), hydraulics and hydrology (closed conduit, open channel flow, runoff analysis, hydrograph development, stormwater management), wastewater collection and treatment (systems, processes, preliminary/primary/secondary/advanced treatment), water quality (TMDLs, stream degradation, biological/chemical contaminants), and drinking water MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 4 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
distribution and treatment (systems, processes, demands, storage, taste and odor control, disinfection, hardness and softening).
Sava Nedic, PE. PMP BCEE, Project Management Kleinfelder BS, Civil Engineering | MS Environmental Engineering, Professional Engineer-Civil, California Mr. Nedic has 40 years of diverse experience in the planning, designing, project management and construction of wastewater and water systems with an emphasis in water conveyance systems including pump stations and pipelines, water treatments and wastewater treatments. He managed and designed multiple water treatment projects employing conventional and advanced water treatment technologies including RO and IX. Mr. Nedic is the Project Management Institute certified Project Management Professional and has served as a project manager for public water and wastewater projects in the counties of Riverside, San Diego, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura, California. Recently he managed a multiple project for the City of San Diego’s Pure water program. Mr. Nedic provides directions and technical guidance to his teams, maintains implementation of quality procedures and leads projects to completions of his projects on time and within budget.
Christina Nishimoto, SE Structural Design Kleinfelder
BS, Structural Engineering | MS Structural Engineering | Professional Engineer – Civil and Structural Ms. Nishimoto has 13 years of experience working with steel, concrete, masonry, and timber structures. She is knowledgeable about the design considerations of all four materials and their respective governing codes. Her project experience includes working on the design and analysis of reservoirs, pump stations, and vaults. Ms. Nishimoto’s design phase work includes attending meetings, coordinating with trade professionals, and structural analysis and detailing. Ms. Nishimoto has experience managing multi-disciplinary teams and overseen the preparation of reports, design drawings, and cost estimates.
Bob Ojeda, PE, Civil Design Kleinfelder
BS, Civil Engineering | Profession - California
Mr. Ojeda has worked as a civil engineer for over 20 years. His primary role has been that of a civil engineer, specializing in land development and storm water management design and permitting. His experience includes the planning and design of various project types including office, retail, residential, resorts, schools, natural gas gathering lines, public and private utilities and roads. He has taken projects from the preliminary phase all the way through to final construction. Documents prepared and processed by Mr. Ojeda have included planned development permits, site development permits, grading plans, improvement plans, erosion control plans, utility plans, encroachment permits, tentative maps, subdivision maps, parcel maps, and lot line adjustments. Mr. Ojeda’s storm water background includes Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs), Water Quality Technical Reports (WQTRs), and Drainage Studies.
Trevor Shackelford, PE Civil Kleinfelder
BS, Environmental Engineering | P - California
Mr. Shackelford is a project engineer with over 5 years of experience specializing in water and wastewater infrastructure design. Mr. Shackelford is experienced in the design of pump stations, solids handling facilities, anaerobic digestion, process systems and treatment systems. He is responsible for detailed design and layout, project management, civil/mechanical calculations and analysis, equipment selection, cost estimation, and development of plans and specifications. Mr. Shackelford is a registered Project Management Professional.
MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 5 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
Edward Tyler, PE IX resin selection Kleinfelder
MS, Civil Engineering; BS, Environmental Engineering | Professional Engineer - Arizona Mr. Tyler’s experience includes 29 years as an environmental/civil engineer specializing in environmental characterization and remediation. Mr. Tyler frequently provides expert guidance related to perchlorate regulation, assessment and remediation. He provided technical writing for the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council on perchlorate. Biological technology expertise includes bio barrier/permeable reactive barrier (PRB) design/implementation using emulsified vegetable oil, zero-valent iron (ZVI), and other carbon substrates. In-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) experience includes the design and implementation utilizing reagents such as hydrogen peroxide, activated persulfate, permanganate, ozone, and calcium peroxide.
Larry VandeVenter Technical Review Committee Kleinfelder BS, Biology
Mr. VandeVenter has 36 years of experience as a professional water treatment engineer. He has performed process development and feasibility studies for numerous water treatment projects throughout the world that have resulted in full-scale plant installations. Mr. VandeVenter is also recognized as an expert in disinfection, control of disinfection byproducts, water reuse, membrane separation technologies, desalination, coagulation, high-rate clarification, filtration, and ozonation. He is a recognized expert for conceptualizing, developing, and designing water treatment processes.
He provides technical guidance for Kleinfelder's most complex water treatment projects.
Bryan Webb, PE Kleinfelder
BS, Civil Engineering - California
Mr. Webb is a project engineer with 6 years of experience specializing in potable, storm, and waste water infrastructure design. Mr. Webb has designed municipal water distribution, sewage collection, and storm conveyance systems. In addition, Mr. Webb has been the lead designer on mechanical piping and pump station system designs for major water and waste water treatment plants. Mr. Webb is responsible for the design related to producing pipeline plans, specifications, and opinion of probable construction costs.
PROPOSED METHOD TO ACCOMPLISH THE WORK
Kleinfelder’s proposed method to accomplish the work has been developed based on the RFP specified scope of services, our understanding of the existing condition of the current water supply system and the RMHE objective and goals. The proposed method to accomplish the work has been prepared for the entire project including the existing well pump reconfiguration, new IX system to remove uranium from the well water, chlorine disinfection system rehabilitation and upgrades, storage reservoir upgrades and rehabilitation/reconfiguration, and new water distribution system pumps station.
Project Understanding and Objectives
RMHE includes 170 mobile homes providing accommodation for a community of up to 585 residents. The existing RMHE water supply system relies on ground water provided by the two existing wells, W2 and W13. One additional well (North Well) exists on site but has not been used in the past. RMHE plans to discontinue the use of W2 and incorporate the North Well into its water system. In addition, the existing system incorporates a disinfection system using sodium MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 6 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
hypochlorite, a transient flow control tank and water distribution booster pump station. Elevated concentrations of uranium and gross alpha were noticed in the groundwater from the existing wells. Presently, uranium radiation levels in the two existing operational wells are in a range of 11-21 pCi/L. A test well was completed in 2017 (Well KB-01) which showed uranium concentrations of 38.9 pCi/L in the shallower (120-149ft) aquifer, and not detected in the deeper (250-271ft) aquifer. RMHE does not have plans to install a new well at hits time.
RMHE wants to design and construct the Groundwater Treatment facility that will remove radionuclides: uranium and gross alpha radiation from the well water and provide for disinfection of the treated water before its delivery to the customers. The objective is to provide the product water quality in compliance with the Division of Drinking Water (DDW) set maximum contaminant level (MCL) and possible to maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) for radionuclides in drinking water including 15 pCi/L and 0 pCi/L, respectively for gross alpha, and 20 pCi/L and 0 pCi/L, respectively for uranium radiation. In addition, RMHE wants to rehabilitate and upgrade the existing water supply system, and to integrate the new uranium removal facility with the overall water supply system providing reliable and safe drinking water supply to the community at acceptable rates.
Project Approach
Kleinfelder’s project approach starts with an assessment of water demand and system hydraulic analysis, and extends through upgrades to the existing well pumps, ground water treatment, disinfection, product water storage and water distribution pump station. A key step in the success of the treatment system design will be the selection of the resin to be used. We have put an emphasis on the selection process as reflected in the scope described below, will provide bid ready design documents, and provide bid assistance to answer any questions and select the right contractor.
TASK 1 SYSTEM ASSESSMENT
The Kleinfelder Project Manager will coordinate and attend a project kick-off meeting with RMHE prior to the start of the tasks outlined below to discuss the scope, schedule, and deliverables. It is anticipated the kick-off meeting will take place at the RMHE and a site walk will occur to view the existing equipment and ground conditions.
Water demand and system capacity sizing. Based on the current and projected customer base, Kleinfelder will assess water demand for the RMHE project based on annual average, daily and hourly peak demands for domestic water supply that will include irrigation and fire protection. We will use historical data of the community water consumption and will work closely with RMHE management to set up per capita water demand. Flow capacity of the Well Water Treatment facility will be sized to provide domestic and limited irrigation water demand. Fire protection flow will be provided by a connection to the well pump discharge that will by-pass the treatment facilities and the community water supply system.
System Hydraulics. Kleinfelder’s basic hydraulic concept assumes the ground water basin is a gigantic storage reservoir that eliminates need for construction of a costly water storage reservoir.
To accommodate hourly peak demand, one of the two existing wellhead pumps and one water distribution pump will be furnished with variably frequency drives. We will examine if the existing wellhead pumps have enough head to overcome head losses through the new IX system and to discharge the treated water into the existing transient flow controlling tank, which may be used as MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 7 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
a wide pipe spot/wet well for the new water distribution pump station. We believe that RMHE will achieve substantial cost saving by eliminating construction of the product water storage reservoir by installation of two VFD pumps (one at the existing well and one at the new well) Existing Well Pump Rehabilitation and Upgrades. Based on historical operation records and field inspection, Kleinfelder will assess the condition of the existing Well 2 and Well 13 pumps and recommend if any repairs or rehabilitation is required for long term operation with the new Well Water Treatment facility. In addition, based on the hydraulic analysis we will propose a VFD retrofit to one or both existing well pumps.
TASK 2 RESIN SELECTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM
Uranium Removal Technology. There are a number of treatment technologies for radionuclides including uranium removal from water such as chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis (RO) and ion exchange resin. However, as identified by the he RFP, uranium treatment process using an ion exchange (IX) resin is the most practical and if properly designed exceptionally reliable and the most cost-efficient technology for this application.
Benefit: Kleinfelder will gather and review all available project relevant information including well construction documents, historical operation and maintenance data as well as water quality data.
Based on the well water quality data and assuming a worst-case water quality scenario (the highest radionuclide contaminant concentration), we will conduct a search for the most appropriate IX resin to remove Uranium and Gross Alpha from the source water. It is assumed that up to twelve IX resin candidates will be identified and screened for the uranium and gross alfa removal. The screening shall include gathering information on operational efficiency from similar facilities, IX resin performance projection, and testing. For the identified IX resin candidates, performance data will be obtained from at least three full scale application with similar water quality and operational conditions with the RMHE project. Based on the performance from the existing full-scale facilities and resin performance projection results, up to three best IX resin candidates will be selected for design. The performance specification for the IX system shall include provisions for testing of the selected IX resin before its installation in the IX vessels.
Benefit: To decrease the burden to the RMHE of disposing toxic and radioactive material coming from the resin regeneration, the IX resin shall be non-regenerable single pass through.
Consequently, the selected IX resin shall be a strong base anionic resin with high affinity to Uranium that surpasses affinities for the other ions. The IX vessel arrangement will be lead-lag with piping system that will allow for interchanging of the lead and lag vessel positions. The IX system will be designed to allow the spent IX resin to be removed and fresh resin to be installed.
Groundwater Treatment Facility. The new Water Treatment facility will be designed as an outdoor facility seated on a concrete housekeeping pad. The IX facility will be designed as a stand-alone packaged system resulting in faster to construct and less to design project costs.
Detailed performance specifications will be prepared in lieu of detailed design drawings so that the constructed facility will meet the project objectives. The performance specifications will specify all IX system components starting from the isolation valve on the IX system inlet piping all way through to the isolation valve on the effluent piping. The design for the system will include IX resin vessels with interconnecting piping, flow controlling valves, as well as process controlling and monitoring instruments.
Water Disinfection. In addition to removing radionuclides, the new Groundwater Treatment facility will include a treated water disinfection system. The existing chlorinator system shall be MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 8 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
rehabilitated and integrated with the new treatment facility to provide disinfection of the treated water. We will assess the physical condition of the existing sodium hypochlorite storage tank and make recommendations if its replacement or rehabilitation will be required. Similarly, we will assess the condition of the existing sodium hypochlorite feed pumps and make recommendations if it requires rehabilitation or replacement with new pumps and piping.
Product Water Distribution. Based on our initial evaluation, it appears the existing well pumps have enough discharge pressure to overcome head losses through IX resin vessels with residual pressure that is sufficient for the treated water to be conveyed and stored in the existing transient flow controlling tank. The existing tank will be rehabilitated and reconfigured to accommodate any changed operational requirements associated with the new treatment facility and will have a function of a wet-well for the water distribution system pump station. Because the system pressure break, the function of the existing water supply booster pumps will change. Kleinfelder will assess the condition of the existing booster pumps and based on the new function in the system will make recommendations for their replacement or (if feasible) rehabilitation and upgrades that may include replacement of the current impellers and electric motors.
Power Supply and Control. With an assumption that the existing power supply system is sufficient for the new Well Water Treatment facilities, the Kleinfelder electrical design will include upgrades, rehabilitation, reconfiguration and reprograming to the existing well water and water distribution pump electric motors, instrumentation, and enclosure for motor starters and electrical control panel with Programmable Logic Controls (PLC).
TASK 3 DESIGN
Design. Upon selection of the best IX resins for the project, Kleinfelder will proceed in the Final Design. The Final Design will be delivered in three submittal steps including 30% Design, 90% Design and the Final Design. The Final Design includes preparation of design plans and specifications and engineering OPCC.
Site topographic maps, as-built or design drawings for the existing wells, chlorinator, reservoir and water distribution pumps will be provided by the RMHE. We will utilize geotechnical information and data from the existing well drilling and design documents of the existing facilities to establish soil parameters for the new facility design. If necessary, additional geotechnical borehole(s) will be requested to be provided by the RMHE after 30% design. Existing record drawings shall be reviewed for underground utilities. Field verification will be performed to visually confirm utility locations by features visible from the surface. If necessary, a potholing will be specified for contractor to confirm physical location of the below grade utilities before construction commencement.
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs. Kleinfelder will prepare and submit an engineering OPCC with the final design submittal. Our engineering cost estimate approach relies on realistic equipment supplier quotes, local construction environment ENR means and methods, Kleinfelder and personnel institutional knowledge, and specialized construction company “reality checks” of estimated costs.
TASK 4 BIDDING SUPPORT
The Kleinfelder Project Manager and team will provide support to RMHE after design during the bidding process by being available during the Pre-bid meeting, working with RMHE to assist MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 9 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
interpreting the bids, assisting RMHE with evaluating the bids and contractor recommendation.
Kleinfelder will also provide conformed documents as needed.
TASK 5 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Project Management. Leading our project team will be Project Manager, Sava Nedic, PE. PMP, BCEE. He has over 40 years of planning, designing, construction and commissioning of several water treatment facilities with diverse treatment technologies, including IX. Before the project kickoff meeting, we will prepare an abbreviated Project Management Plan that will include scope of work, budget, project execution schedule and deliverable quality assurance / control (QA/QC) procedures and approaches.
We will use the schedule to keep track of progress and to assure that all deliverables are produced and delivered as planned. As the project execution proceeds, we will update the schedule which will be submitted to and discussed with the RMHE project management. We will use earned value approach for invoicing and to assess our project budgetary performance. Any changes in the scope, schedule, and budget during the project execution will be immediately presented to and discussed with the RMHE project management.
Kleinfelder’s standard Quality Management Program (QMP) will be implemented to secure quality of all deliverables. The QA/QC plan will include reviews of all deliverables by project staff and by independent technical staff. All internal QA/QC issues will be resolved prior to submittal to the RMHE and written documentation of all reviews will be maintained.
FEE PROPOSAL
Kleinfelder’s proposed fee for the Groundwater Treatment Facility project is $77,865. A summary of the proposed fee breakdown per tasks of the Proposed Scope of Service is presented in the table below.
FEE ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Groundwater Treatment Facility
LABOR CATEGORY TOTAL
HOURS
LABOR
FEE
EXPENS
E FEE
TOTAL
FEE
TASK 1 – System Assessment 22 $3,000 $0 $3,000
TASK 2 – IX Resin Selection 56 $10,100 $650 $10,750
TASK 3 – Design 354 $52,200 $700 $52,900
TASK 4 – Bidding Support 30 $4,700 $200 $4,900
TASK 5 – Project Management 31 $5,800 $515 $6,315
TOTALS 493 $75,800 $2,065 $77,865
Our Master Services Agreement (MSA) for professional services is attached for your review. If our proposed scope of services, General Conditions, and fee meet your needs please initial each page of the MSA, sign both copies of the Work Order attached to the MSA and return to our office.
Upon receipt, we will return one fully executed copy for your records.
MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 10 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
If there is a need for any change in the scope of services described in this proposal, please contact us immediately. Changes may require revision of the proposed fee, which will be communicated to you upon assessment of the requested changes.
All terms and conditions indicated in this proposal will be considered by both parties to be in effect from the effective date of the executed contract through completion of the project. Separate proposals for future phases of work can be provided as the development process moves forward.
The following are assumptions of the Kleinfelder proposed fee:
1. The proposed fee is based on the RFP proposed Scope of Services.
2. The proposed fee is based on assumed labor hours to complete the task as defined and described in the RFP and on Kleinfelder’s labor hourly rates.
3. Kleinfelder’s proposed fee assumes that the final design will have 16 design drawings, as follows:
Discipline Number of
Sheets Discipline Number of Sheets
G-General 4 M-Process Mechanical 2
D-Demolition 1 E-Electrical 3
C-Civil 3 I-Instrumentation and Control 2
S-Structural 1
Total Number of Sheets 16
OTHER INFORMATION
The Kleinfelder project team has a vast and diverse experience including studying, planning, testing and designing IX treatment facilities. The variety of our experience with groundwater treatment includes ex-situ, biological and physical/chemical (ion exchange) processes for potable water supply as well as in-situ groundwater basin remediation. We have pride in our environmental CEQA and NEPA work experience such as environmental documents and permits recently prepared for the City of Coronado, CA and completed within a record short time of less than seven months. Our experience with condition assessment, hydraulics and reconfiguration of existing pumping facilities such recently completed Miramar Lake Pump Station for the City of San Diego (Project #4 below) will be another exceptional benefit of our experience for the RMHE project.
Below is a sample of our project Team’s proven expertise, directly relevant to the scope of work that, in addition to the contaminant removal, includes rehabilitation and reconfiguring of well pumps, chemical disinfection, yard piping and water supply distribution pump station.
MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 11 of 1
3 September 27, 2019
© 2019 Kleinfelder
MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 12 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
1. Plant 150 Perchlorate Removal Project
East Valley Water District
Highland, California
Key Personnel: Sava Nedic
With elevated perchlorate concentration at three Bunker Hill Basin groundwater wells, the East Valley Water District required a treatment facility to remove perchlorate and to keep the existing wells usable for domestic water supply. In addition to perchlorate, the ground water was characterized with elevated nitrate and sulfate concentration, the competing ions for ion exchange sites of IXresin.
Led by Project Manager and Design Manager, Mr. Nedic, the project was completed in three steps including a desktop study of perchlorate treatment technologies, pilot test of the selected IX resin and the Plant 150 design. A dozen different resin products were identified and evaluated for resin modeling and performance compared to similar full-scale facilities. The results provided three resins for pilot testing.
A small scale nine-column pilot unit was constructed to test for perchlorate removal. Ground water from one of the wells was adjusted to match composition of water blend from the three wells by using externally added chemicals. Using three different perchlorate concentrations (low, medium and high), pilot testing was complete resulting in the selection of the best performing resin for final design.
Plant 150 was designed to include piping system for influent water from three wells, IX for perchlorate removal, on-site sodium hypochlorite generation for product water disinfection, two 2 MG product water storage reservoirs and product water pump station connecting P150 with City water distribution system.
The overall plant layout was developed to provide for capacity extension from 7,000 gpm to 12,000 gpm, and to accommodate possible future treatment requirements for nitrate and chromium VI removal. Project activities including desktop evaluation, pilot testing and final design was completed within budget and as scheduled in 18months.
On-Time & On-Budget
Relevance:
• Ex-situ ion exchange (resin) treatment of
perchlorate
• Perchlorate removal evaluation and
O&M procedures
Project Successes and Client Benefits:
• Pilot testing resulted in decision to use
single pass IX resin
• The best IX resin performer resulted in
substantial cost saving
2. Perchlorate / Chlorinated Solvent Plume Remediation Evaluation Phoenix Airport, Goodyear, Arizona
Key Personnel: Edward Tyler
Waste from aircraft preservation and routine aircraft maintenance from cleaning and degreasing was discharged into the main drainage ditch eventually draining into a marsh area. The discharged waste streams contained oil, grease, battery acids, and miscellaneous degreasing solvents. This practice continued until 1952, when the on-site sewage treatment plant was constructed. Many of the waste streams generated were attributed to metal treatment processes such as anodizing, degreasing, and etching. These waste streams included waste solvents TCE, chromium sludge, and processed wastewater. Prior to 1980, much of the waste generated from anodizing, metal etching, and a plastic polishing was disposed of in three on-site sludge drying beds located at the southern portion of the plant.
Kleinfelder conducted an engineering review of the existing system including an evaluation of the ex-situ treatment design employing ion exchange and an air stripper for the treatment of commingled perchlorate; 1,4-dioxane; and chlorinated solvents (e.g., PCE, TCE). The review provided recommendations for continued treatment and alternatives such as in-situ treatment with carbon amendment and/or zero valent iron (ZVI).
On-Time & On-Budget
Relevance:
• Ex-situ ion exchange (resin) treatment
of perchlorate
• Perchlorate removal evaluation and
O&M procedures
Project Successes and Client Benefits:
• Completed on-time and on-budget
MP200307.001P/SAC19P101786 Page 13 of 13 September 27, 2019 © 2019 Kleinfelder
3. Pump Station and Force Main Project, Coronado,California Key Personnel: Natalie Smith
Kleinfelder provided design, environmental compliance and permitting support for an accelerated wastewater force main installation project including modifications to two wastewater pump stations to provide odor control and connection to the City of Coronado collection system.
The project includes the installation of 14,250 LF of 8-inch High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) force main to convey wastewater from the Navy Coastal Campus to the City of Coronado wastewater collection system. This design includes approximately 13,700 LF of open cut pipe installation, one 385 ft long segments of Horizontal Directionally Drilled (HDD) and one 165 ft long segment of jack and bore pipe installation totaling approximately 3,250 LF.
Project execution was successfully executed on an accelerated timeline and required alignment of multiple stakeholders and regulatory bodies, including Caltrans, State Parks, the Navy, and Coastal Commission. Because the project is located on the Navy campus, within the State right-of way, and on City property, the project needed to comply with both the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An initial study/mitigated negative declaration document under CEQA was prepared and coordination with the Navy to prepare a memorandum for file to comply with NEPA was performed. A key project issue is the avoidance of critical and environmentally sensitive habitats and successful permitting requiring coastal development authorizations across multiple coastal permitjurisdictions.
On-Time & On-Budget
Relevance:
• CEQA Compliance with multiple
stakeholders
Project Successes and Client Benefits:
• Met accelerated schedule and avoided
additional delays
• Completed on-time and on-budget
4. Miramar Reservoir Raw Water Pump Station Upgrade
Key Personnel: Art Garcia
The City of San Diego Public Utilities Department retained Kleinfelder to perform assessment, planning and design services for upgrading and potential modification to the Miramar Reservoir Raw Water Pump Station as it will become a key hydraulic link in San Diego Pure Water Program. The station currently consists of 6-200 hp, 12,000 gpm pumps. Originally constructed in 1959, the facility expanded in 1978, was rehabilitated in 2005 and two variable frequency drive pumps were provided in 2015.
The station currently operates under two different scenarios, first to provide reservoir water surface elevation control which requires only one pump at reduced speed for several hours a day, and secondly, during infrequent County Water Authority (CWA) raw water shut-downs, the station operates with 4 to 6 pumps 24 hours per day for the duration of the shutdown providing the sole water supply of up to approximately 100 mgd to the Miramar Water TreatmentPlant.
Kleinfelder prepared a program to fully assess physical and functional condition of the station and equipment, including conducting performance tests on the pumps and acoustical monitoring of the station operating under normal and maximum demand on the adjacent properties. Alternatives for upgrading the station range from keeping the current configuration and rehabilitating the existing pumping units to providing a building to enclose the pumps for aesthetics and noise reduction purposes.
The initial assessment studies concluded that although the pumps currently show considerable wear and loss of efficiency, they can be rehabilitated to reestablish nearly new pump efficiency and the noise emanating from the station is within the existing City noise ordinances. The most significant issue in designing the pump station upgrade will be to designing protection or replacement of the section of the existing 66-in Miramar Potable Water Transmission Pipeline routed through the station site.
On-Time & On-Budget
Relevance:
• Well 37 Reconfiguration
Project Successes and Client Benefits:
• Completed on-time and on-budget
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
CLIENT MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT
SAC19C101787
This Agreement is made on:
Between Alliance Manufactured Homes, Inc. with offices at 2967 Daylight Way, San Jose, CA (Client)
And Kleinfelder, Inc. with offices at 2882 Prospect Park Dr., Suite 200, Rancho Cordova, CA (Kleinfelder).
Recitals
A. Client wishes to appoint Kleinfelder to provide certain services (the Services, as defined below) required by Client or Client’s agreement with the Owner for one or more projects on a Work Order basis and on the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.
B. Kleinfelder has agreed to perform the Services on the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.
Now it is agreed as follows:
1. CONTENTS OF AGREEMENT
1.1 The parties agree that the documents listed in 1.1(a) through (e) constitute the “Contract Documents” of this Agreement. To establish obligations and resolve ambiguities in the Contract Documents, the following order of precedence will prevail:
(a) first, amendments and Change Orders issued in accordance with this Agreement; (b) second, Work Orders (Appendix A, as defined below); (c) third, Kleinfelder’s Proposal, dated September 27, 2019, which the Client acknowledges receipt and confirms understanding of, and agreement with the contents thereof, in full (Appendix B), or Kleinfelder’s Proposals subsequently issued and referenced, attached or incorporated into Work Orders; (d) fourth, this Agreement; and
(e) fifth, those portions of the Client’s agreement with Owner dated (Prime Agreement), if and as applicable to Kleinfelder and incorporated as provided in clause 1.4 (Appendix C).
1.2 To the extent of any inconsistency between this Agreement and any Prime Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement will always prevail.
1.3 Any pre-printed terms and conditions on forms used by either party in the administration of this Agreement are void and do not supplement or replace the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents of this Agreement.
1.4 Kleinfelder agrees to be bound to Client in the same way Client is bound to (Owner), to the extent the provisions referenced at clause 1.1(e) are applicable to the Services under a given Work Order and provided those provisions of the Prime Agreement are expressly identified and furnished to Kleinfelder prior to entering into the Work Order.
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
2. APPOINTMENT AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.1 This Agreement anticipates the execution of various written work orders (in the form of Appendix A) which the parties agree will specify the scope of Services to be performed (Services) and Client's project for which the Services will be performed (Project), the location of Client’s Project for providing the Services (Site), the time period for performance, the agreed fees and additional provisions, if any, applicable to such Services (Work Orders).
2.2 By executing this Agreement, Client does not guarantee any future work, nor does Kleinfelder commit to performing any specific future Work Order.
3. STANDARD OF CARE
3.1 Kleinfelder will perform its Services in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of Kleinfelder’s profession practicing in the same locality, under similar conditions and at the date the Services are provided.
3.2 Kleinfelder makes no representation, guarantee or warranty, express or implied, regarding the Services, or any communication (oral or written), certification, report, opinion, or Instrument of Service provided pursuant to this Agreement.
3.3 Kleinfelder will not be responsible for constant or exhaustive inspection of the work, for the means, methods, techniques sequences or procedures of construction, or for the safety procedures employed by any party other than its own employees, subconsultants and subcontractors.
3.4 No level of assessment can conclusively determine whether a property or its structures are completely free of geotechnical hazards or hazardous substances (including but not limited to mold). Client represents that it has carefully reviewed the limitations described in the Proposal.
3.5 Even with diligent observation, some defects, deficiencies, or omissions may occur. Before exercising any other remedy for any alleged breach by Kleinfelder of this Agreement, Client will direct Kleinfelder in writing to reperform any defective Services within twelve (12) months after completion of the Services.
3.6 Kleinfelder will only sign certifications relating to the Services if Kleinfelder agreed in writing prior to the commencement of the Services to provide such certifications. Such certifications are statements of professional opinion only.
4. KLEINFELDER’S RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 Kleinfelder will perform the Services as an independent contractor and not as an agent or employee of Client.
Nothing in this Agreement creates any special relationship or fiduciary duty.
4.2 Kleinfelder will, as reasonably directed by Client or its authorized agent:
(a) provide qualified staff to perform the Services;
(b) maintain records of Project activities and costs for no more than three years from its completion of the Services;
(c) coordinate to the extent reasonably possible with Client’s employees, contractors, consultants so as not to impede the progress of the Project; and
(d) require its personnel to maintain a safe, clean and orderly work environment.
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
5. TERM AND TERMINATION
5.1 This Agreement will commence on the date of its execution, except as to any Services authorized by Client and performed by Kleinfelder beforehand, and will continue in effect for two years or until terminated by either party or extended for an additional two years by mutual written agreement of the parties.
5.2 Either party may terminate this Agreement or any Work Order at any time by providing not less than ten (10) days’ written notice to the other party.
5.3 Notwithstanding the termination or expiry of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement will survive and continue to apply to all Work Orders signed by both parties prior to the Agreement’s effective termination or expiry date, and until all of the rights and obligations of both parties have been fulfilled.
5.4 Within fifteen (15) days from termination Client will pay Kleinfelder on demand for all Services rendered and costs incurred through to the date of any termination and for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Kleinfelder in effecting the termination, including, without limitation, non-cancellable commitments, fixed cost components and other demobilization costs.
6. COMPENSATION
6.1 In consideration for undertaking the Services, the Client shall pay to Kleinfelder the sum specified in each Work Order in payments in accordance with the terms of each Work Order and the payment provisions of this Agreement.
6.2 Client agrees to provide any special invoicing requirements to Kleinfelder in advance of signing this Agreement, to which additional charges may apply.
6.3 Kleinfelder reserves the right to periodically adjust its fee schedule.
6.4 Kleinfelder will generally submit its invoices to Client on a monthly basis. Client must pay all invoices within thirty (30) days from the date of invoice, with interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1 1/2 %) per month payable on all outstanding payments. Interest on all outstanding payments will be charged from the initial date of invoice.
6.5 Kleinfelder may suspend performance of Services under this Agreement until it has been paid in full for all outstanding payments, including interest charges.
6.6 Kleinfelder will be entitled to recover from Client on demand all expenses incurred (including all legal costs and expenses) in recovering any outstanding payments from Client.
6.7 All travel will be invoiced at cost and reimbursed by Client. All travel required under this Agreement is subject to the terms, conditions and applicable rates set forth in the U.S. Federal Travel Regulations.
7. INSURANCE
7.1 Kleinfelder will maintain during the term of this Agreement worker's compensation, commercial general liability, automobile liability Insurance and professional indemnity insurance coverage.
7.2 Client will maintain during the term of this Agreement adequate insurance coverage and will require and verify any contractors or parties it hires to have adequate insurance coverage. Client agrees that failure to comply with this clause will invalidate any indemnify provided by Kleinfelder under clause 12.1.
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
8. CHANGES TO SCOPE OF SERVICES
8.1 Client or Kleinfelder may request to modify the scope of Services as set out in any Work Order, whereon both parties agree to negotiate in good faith and execute a written Change Order. A Change Order is an amendment to this Agreement or to a Work Order that modifies the Services and specifies the following:
(a) a change in the terms and conditions or Services;
(b) an adjustment in the schedule for performance; and
(c) the amount of adjustment in Kleinfelder’s compensation.
8.2 Kleinfelder will treat as a Change Order any written or oral Client order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, or determinations) which request changes in the Services. Kleinfelder will give Client written notice within a reasonable time of any resulting adjustment in the schedule and compensation. Unless Client objects in writing within 5 business days, the proposed terms of the Change Order with the adjustment in the schedule and price shall become a part of this Agreement.
8.3 If Client and Kleinfelder cannot agree upon an equitable adjustment in the schedule and compensation, and Kleinfelder does not sign the Change Order, the disagreement shall be treated as a Dispute under clause 18.
9. FORCE MAJEURE
9.1 Kleinfelder will not be liable for delay or failure to perform its Services caused directly or indirectly by circumstances beyond its control, including but not limited to, acts of God, fire, flood, war, sabotage, accident, labor dispute, shortage, government action or inaction, changed conditions, delays resulting from actions or inactions of Client or third parties, Site inaccessibility or inability of others to obtain material, labor, equipment, or transportation.
9.2 Should any of the preceding circumstances occur, then the date for completion or any other milestone date shall be adjusted for the delay in accordance with clause 8, provided Kleinfelder reports the delay to Client within a reasonable time of discovery.
10. INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
10.1 All data, reports, drawings, plans, or other documents (or copies) provided to Kleinfelder by Client for the purposes of this Agreement will, at Client’s written request, be returned upon completion of the Services and payment in full for all Services rendered. Client agrees that Kleinfelder may retain one copy of all such documents.
10.2 Client agrees:
(a) all reports, drawings, plans, documents, software, source code, object code, boring logs, field data, field notes, calculations, estimates, laboratory test data and other similar data, documents and work products (or copies thereof) in any form prepared by Kleinfelder pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service (Instruments of Service), not products;
(b) Kleinfelder will retain exclusive ownership, copyright and title to all Instruments of Service, and Client has no rights to incomplete or partial data;
(c) all opinions, certifications, communications (oral or written) or Instruments of Service furnished to Client are intended for the benefit of Client for the specific purposes stated herein and therein, are not intended to inform, guide, or otherwise influence any entities or persons other than Client in relation to the Project, and are not intended or represented to be suited for reuse by Client or others, and; (d) reuse without the specific prior written consent of Kleinfelder will be at the user’s sole risk and without Kleinfelder liability, and Client agrees (i) to remove Kleinfelder’s and Kleinfelder’s consultants’ names and seals therefrom, and (ii) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Kleinfelder and Kleinfelder’s
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
contractors, consultants, affiliates, directors and employees from and against all losses, damages and liabilities (including all legal expenses) in connection with the unauthorized use.
10.3 Any requests by third parties for reliance upon any communication (oral or written), certification, report, opinion, or Instrument of Service provided by Kleinfelder pursuant to this Agreement will be subject to approval at Kleinfelder’s sole discretion and to additional fees, terms and conditions.
11. CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES
11.1 Client agrees to provide and discuss with Kleinfelder on an ongoing basis throughout all available material, data, and information pertaining to the Services, including, without limitation, (i) the composition, quantity, toxicity, or potentially hazardous properties of any material known or believed to be present at any Site, (ii) any hazards that may be present, (iii) the nature and location of underground or otherwise not readily apparent utilities, (iv) summaries and assessments of the Site's past and present compliance status, (v) the status of any filed or pending judicial or administrative action concerning the Site or Project, and (vi) Client records (in electronic format where possible) for such data as benchmarks, plans, maps, and property ownership.
11.2 Client will ensure the cooperation of Client’s employees, contractors and consultants with Kleinfelder.
11.3 Client acknowledges and agrees that Kleinfelder is entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of any information given by Client, its employees, contractors and consultants.
11.4 Client will provide reasonable assistance to obtain data and records concerning the Site or Project in the possession, custody or control of third parties.
12. ALLOCATION OF RISK AND INDEMNITIES
12.1 Subject to the limitation of liability provisions of this Agreement, Kleinfelder indemnifies Client against all liabilities, losses or damages caused by the negligence or other fault of Kleinfelder and its employees, agents, representatives, subcontractors, and any other party for whom Kleinfelder is legally responsible (Kleinfelder Parties), but only to the extent such liabilities, losses or damages are caused by the negligence or other fault of the Kleinfelder Parties when compared to the negligence or other fault of all other persons and entities. If California law applies to this Agreement, the parties also expressly agree that this indemnity provision does not include, and in no event shall Kleinfelder be required to assume, any obligation or duty to defend any claims, cause of action, demands, or lawsuits in connection with or arising out of this Project or the Services rendered by Kleinfelder. This clause 12.1 is not intended to and will not in any way be limited by any insurance coverage available to Client under any Kleinfelder insurance policy.
12.2 Client indemnifies Kleinfelder against all liabilities, losses or damages caused by the negligence or other fault of Client and its employees, agents, representatives, subcontractors, and all other parties for whom Client is legally responsible (Client Parties), but only to the extent such liabilities, losses or damages are caused by the negligence or other fault of Client Parties when compared to the negligence or other fault of all other applicable persons and entities. If California law applies to this Agreement, the parties also expressly agree that this indemnity provision does not include, and in no event shall Client be required to assume, any obligation or duty to defend any claims, cause of action, demands, or lawsuits in connection with or arising out of this Project or services rendered by Client. This clause 12.2 is not intended to and will not in any way be limited by any insurance coverage available to Kleinfelder under any Client, Owner or Project insurance policy.
12.3 Subject to any applicable statutory limitations, the indemnity obligations in this clause 12 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
13. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
13.1 The maximum aggregate liability of Kleinfelder arising out of or related to this Agreement and all Work Orders and amendments thereto, whether based in contract or tort or otherwise in law or equity, will be limited to the greater of the compensation actually paid to Kleinfelder for the Services under all Work Orders or $50,000, and Client hereby releases Kleinfelder from any liability above such amount. This limitation of liability includes any losses payable to Client under clause 12.1 and will apply to any and all claims.
13.2 This limitation of liability has been agreed after Client and Kleinfelder discussed the risks and rewards associated with the Project and the Services as well as the provision of the Services within both the obligations of this Agreement and the associated compensation. Upon written request by Client, the parties may negotiate in good faith and agree, by way of a written Change Order in accordance with clause 8 herein, to increase the amount of this liability limitation or eliminate it in exchange for payment of increased compensation to Kleinfelder.
13.3 As used in this clause 13, “Kleinfelder” includes Kleinfelder, its affiliates, subconsultants and subcontractors, and their respective partners, officers, directors, shareholders and employees. The limitation of liability established in this clause 13 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
14. WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
14.1 Neither party will be liable to the other party for any special, incidental, indirect, exemplary, punitive, penal or consequential damages however arising incurred by either Kleinfelder or Client or for which either may be liable to a third party.
15. NO CONTROL OF MEANS AND METHODS OF OTHERS
15.1 Client agrees:
(a) Kleinfelder will have no control over or charge of or responsibility for the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for the safety precautions and programs of Client’s employees, or contractors or consultants engaged by Client in connection with the Project; (b) Kleinfelder’s performance of the Services does not include any job site safety obligations which may be required by or in connection with the Project or the Services or any applicable code or regulation, other than strictly in respect of its own employees; and
(c) Kleinfelder will not have control over or charge of the acts or omissions of any contractor or contractors’ agents, employees or subcontractors.
16. SITE ACCESS
16.1 Client agrees to:
(a) provide unimpeded and timely access to the Site, including any third party sites, if required; (b) provide an adequate area for Kleinfelder’s Site office facilities, equipment storage, and parking; (c) furnish all construction utilities and utility releases necessary for the performance of the Services; and (d) obtain all permits, licenses or authorizations necessary for the performance of the Services.
17. WARRANTY OF TITLE, WASTE OWNERSHIP
17.1 Kleinfelder will not take title to or be liable for any hazardous materials found at any Project Site. Any risk of loss with respect to all materials remains with Client or the Site owner, who will be considered the generator of such materials, execute all manifests as the generator of such materials, and be liable for the arrangement,
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
transportation, treatment, and/or disposal of all material. All samples remain the property of Client. Client agrees to promptly, at its cost, remove and lawfully dispose of samples, cuttings, and hazardous materials.
18. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
18.1 If a dispute arises out of or relates this Agreement (Dispute), the parties agree to submit the Dispute to mediation pursuant to the Construction Industry Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA). The mediator will be an independent person agreed between the parties from a panel suggested by the Institute or, failing agreement, a mediator appointed by AAA. A party shall not call for mediation of any Dispute after such period of time as would bar the initiation of legal proceedings to litigate such Dispute under the laws of the state in which the Project is located.
18.2 Client and Kleinfelder agree that in the event of a Dispute, they will not seek recourse against individual officers, employees, directors, or shareholders of the other party.
18.3 A party shall not start court proceedings in relation to a Dispute until it has exhausted the procedures in this clause, unless the party seeks injunctive or other interlocutory relief.
18.4 If the Dispute cannot be resolved through mediation, either party may file suit in an appropriate court in the state where the Services are performed.
18.5 This clause survives termination or expiry of this Agreement.
19. MISCELLANEOUS
19.1 This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the state where the Services are performed. The parties hereby submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the state where the Services are performed and waive any right to object to any proceedings being brought in those courts.
19.2 Waiver of any term, condition or breach of this Agreement will not operate as a subsequent waiver of the same term, condition or breach. A waiver is not valid or binding unless made in writing.
19.3 If any provision of this Agreement is found by a duly constituted authority to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, all remaining provisions shall continue in force.
19.4 This Agreement does not create, nor will it be construed to create, any benefit or right in any third party or any special relationship or fiduciary duty to third parties.
19.5 This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter. It supersedes all earlier conduct, prior agreements and understandings between the parties in connection with its subject matter.
19.6 Client and Kleinfelder shall abide by the requirements of 41 CFR 60-1.4(a), 60-300.5(a) and 60-741.5(a). These regulations prohibit discrimination against qualified individuals based on their status as protected veterans or individuals with disabilities, and prohibit discrimination against all individuals based on their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Moreover, these regulations require that covered prime contractors and subcontractors take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment individuals without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, protected veteran status or disability.
Client Master Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
19.7 All notices, requests or instructions hereunder must be in writing and either hand delivered to the recipient, delivered by registered mail or express mail the addresses given in this Agreement.
19.8 This Agreement cannot be assigned by either party without the prior written approval of the other party.
Kleinfelder may subcontract performance of portions of the Services to a qualified subcontractor.
19.9 Any amendment or revision to this Agreement, including for the avoidance of any doubt, to any Work Order, must be in writing and signed by both parties. Any oral modification or revision of this Agreement shall not operate to modify this Agreement.
19.10 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including photo or electronic copies, which taken together, shall constitute one original document.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Client and Kleinfelder have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.
CLIENT: KLEINFELDER:
By: By:
Printed Name: Printed Name:
Title: Title:
ATTACHMENTS: Appendix A, Sample Work Order
Appendix B, Kleinfelder Proposal (as applicable)
Appendix C, Prime Agreement /Client Requirements (as applicable) Client Design Services Agreement (USA) July 2014
APPENDIX A: WORK ORDER
Issued Pursuant to The Client Master Services Agreement effective as of by and between (Client) and Kleinfelder, Inc. (Kleinfelder).
Client Name: Kleinfelder Project No:
Project Name: Work Order Type: (Check One)
Time-and-Materials
Fixed-Price
Kleinfelder Office: Subcontractor Reference No:
Kleinfelder Contact Name:
1. SCOPE OF WORK:
(Continue on additional page, if needed)
2. LOCATION/CLIENT FACILITY INVOLVED:
3. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM: TO:
4. AUTHORIZED FUNDING:
5. SPECIAL PROVISIONS:
NOTICE TO PROCEED IS GIVEN ON (DATE):
CLIENT: KLEINFELDER:
By: ____________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Printed Name: Printed Name:
Title: Title:
Address: Address:
Client Master Services Agreement – Work Order (USA) July 2014 WORK ORDER SAC19W101788
Issued Pursuant to The Client Master Services Agreement SAC19C101787 effective as of September 27, 2019 by and between Alliance Manufactured Homes, Inc. (Client) and Kleinfelder, Inc. (Kleinfelder).
Client Name: Alliance Manufactured Homes, Inc. Kleinfelder Project No: MP200607.001P Project Name: Riverview Mobile Home Estates Work Order Type: (Check One) Time-and-Materials
Fixed-Price
Kleinfelder Office: Sacramento
Kleinfelder Contact Name: Joe Zilles
1. SCOPE OF WORK: Engineering services as outlined in our proposal dated September 27, 2019.
2. LOCATION/CLIENT FACILITY INVOLVED: 8200 Jantzen Road, Stanislaus County, CA
3. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM: September 27, 2019 TO: December 27, 2019
4. AUTHORIZED FUNDING: $77,865.00
5. SPECIAL PROVISIONS:
NOTICE TO PROCEED IS GIVEN ON (DATE):
CLIENT: KLEINFELDER:
By: By:
Printed Name: Printed Name:
Title: Title:
Address: Address:
2882 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 200,
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Quality Service, Inc.
2996 McHenry Ave. Escalon, CA 95320 | (209) 838‐7842
1 August 2nd, 2019
Riverview Mobile Home Estates, LLC
871 38th Ave.,
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Attn: Bill Ebert
RE: Proposal for Modular Radium, Uranium, and (future) Nitrate Water Treatment System JOBSITE: Riverview Mobile Home Park
ADDRESS: 8200 Jantzen Rd., Modesto, CA 95357
PSID: CA5000090
Quality Service, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal and budgetary pricing for a new water filtration system for radium and uranium treatment, which is intended to address immediate concerns regarding radionuclide MCL compliance at the site. The equipment will be modular to allow for integration of nitrate ion exchange media given that levels are rising over time. Our proposed scope of work includes the design, engineering, permitting, installation (including site work), and pilot testing of a full‐scale ion exchange water filtration system for radium and uranium removal.
Task 1.0 System Design and Permitting: $120,800.00
1.1 Structural engineering, civil design & tie‐in details for water treatment facility.
1.2 Permitting according to Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources expectation (County fees, IE. plan check fees, are not included in this pricing).
1.2.1 Permit Amendment Application
1.2.2 Technical Report (this does not include a full TMF analysis)
1.2.3 Plans & Specifications
1.2.4 Environmental Checklist (CEQA)
1.2.5 Up to two (2) meetings and one (1) revision to submittal Task 2.0 Water Treatment Plant Construction: $720,168.00
2.1 Preparing for site for construction: USA markings, security fencing, portable restroom, site grading, etc. Rental/provision of equipment for site prep.
2.2 Well Modification
2.2.1 North PVC Well permitting finalization to tie‐in with system.
2.2.2 Plumbing modifications at North PVC and Southwest wells (includes bypass). (NOTE: Demolition or repurposing of South Well is not included in this work.) Quality Service, Inc.
2996 McHenry Ave. Escalon, CA 95320 | (209) 838‐7842
2 2.3 Foundation Work
2.4 Storage Tank & Booster Pump System
2.5 Filtration System
2.6 Electrical
2.6.1 Includes full control system for alarming loss of pressure, low chlorine, high chlorine, low tank level, and overflow condition. Control system to monitor chlorine concentration, system pressure, storage tank level, and meter readings (raw, treated, and distributed). Controls to automate backwashing, booster pump operation, chlorine injection, and well operation. Radio transmission to main office for broadcast to internet‐based HMI for remote monitoring.
2.6.2 A second sodium hypochlorite injection system, per 02/09/2019 email correspondence.
2.7 Construction finalization & cleanup
Task 3.0 Water Treatment System Initiation: $45,325.00
3.1 System Startup & Pressure Testing
3.2 Water Treatment Plant Pilot Study
3.2 Preparation and provision of Pilot Study report for county submittal.
3.3 Operations & Maintenance Plan Revision
Total Estimated Cost for Tasks 1‐3:
$886,293.00
By signing below, you acknowledge that you have read the information provided in this proposal and agree to the terms outlined therein and in the attached terms and conditions. Your signature below indicates that you have chosen to have Quality Service, Inc. proceed with the proposed scope of work outlined here.
Provided by: _________________________ Accepted by: _________________________ Tom McCoy/ QSI
Date: ________________ _ Date: _____________ ____ Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Feasibility Study Report
April 2021
F
Appendix F
Detailed Cost Estimates
Option 1 Consolidation with City of Hughson
Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Cost
Mobilization/Demobilization LS 120,000.00 $ 1 120,000.00 $ Demolition and Removal of Existing Equipment LS 8,000.00 $ 1 8,000.00 $ Well Abandonment LS 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $
Traffic Control LS 125,000.00 $ 1 125,000.00 $
Sheeting and Shoring LS 38,000.00 $ 1 38,000.00 $ 12" Water Line LF 160.00 $ 10243 1,638,880.00 $ Tapping Sleeve and Valve EA 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $ Connect to Existing Piping EA 5,000.00 $ 2 10,000.00 $ 12" Gate Valve EA 2,650.00 $ 2 5,300.00 $
Backflow Preventer EA 10,000.00 $ 1 10,000.00 $
Trench Resurfacing LF 44.00 $ 10243 450,692.00 $ 6" Diameter Water Master Meter EA 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $ Disinfection and Testing LS 10,000.00 $ 1 10,000.00 $ Bore and Jack LF 1,000.00 $ 75 75,000.00 $
Easement Acquisition and Permits LS 25,000.00 $ 1 25,000.00 $ $ 2,533,872.00
$ 633,468.00
$ 3,167,340.00
$ 475,101.00
$ 475,101.00
$ 4,117,542.00
Option2 Consolidation with City of Modesto
Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Cost
Mobilization/Demobilization LS 200,000.00 $ 1 200,000.00 $ Demolition and Removal of Existing Equipment LS 8,000.00 $ 1 8,000.00 $ Well Abandonment LS 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $
Traffic Control LS 150,000.00 $ 1 150,000.00 $
Sheeting and Shoring LS 60,000.00 $ 1 60,000.00 $ 12" Water Line LF 160.00 $ 20539 3,286,240.00 $ Tapping Sleeve and Valve EA 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $ Connect to Existing Piping EA 5,000.00 $ 2 10,000.00 $ 12" Gate Valve EA 2,650.00 $ 2 5,300.00 $
Backflow Preventer EA 10,000.00 $ 1 10,000.00 $
Trench Resurfacing LF 44.00 $ 20539 903,716.00 $ 6" Diameter Water Master Meter EA 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $ Disinfection and Testing LS 10,000.00 $ 1 10,000.00 $ Bore and Jack LF 1,000.00 $ 100 100,000.00 $
Easement Acquisition and Permits LS 25,000.00 $ 1 25,000.00 $ $ 4,786,256.00
$ 1,196,564.00
$ 5,982,820.00
$ 897,423.00
$ 897,423.00
$ 7,777,666.00
Estimated Total Project Cost
Construction Subtotal
Contingency (25%)
Construction Total
Engineering, Environmental, Field Investigation (15% construction cost) Construction Management & Administration (15% construction cost) Construction Subtotal
Contingency (25%)
Construction Total
Engineering, Environmental, Field Investigation (15% construction cost) Construction Management & Administration (15% construction cost) Estimated Total Project Cost
Option 3 Consolidation with SRWA
Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Cost
Mobilization/Demobilization LS 78,000.00 $ 1 78,000.00 $ Demolition and Removal of Existing Equipment LS 8,000.00 $ 1 8,000.00 $ Well Abandonment LS 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $
Traffic Control LS 110,000.00 $ 1 110,000.00 $
Sheeting and Shoring LS 24,000.00 $ 1 24,000.00 $ 12" Water Line LF 160.00 $ 6652 1,064,320.00 $ Tapping Sleeve and Valve EA 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $ Connect to Existing Piping EA 5,000.00 $ 2 10,000.00 $ 12" Gate Valve EA 2,650.00 $ 2 5,300.00 $
Backflow Preventer EA 10,000.00 $ 1 10,000.00 $
Trench Resurfacing LF 44.00 $ 6652 292,688.00 $ 6" Diameter Water Master Meter EA 6,000.00 $ 1 6,000.00 $ Disinfection and Testing LS 10,000.00 $ 1 10,000.00 $ Easement Acquisition and Permits LS 20,000.00 $ 1 20,000.00 $ $ 1,650,308.00
$ 412,577.00
$ 2,062,885.00
$ 309,432.75
$ 309,432.75
Estimated Total Project Cost $ 2,681,750.50
Construction Subtotal
Contingency (25%)
Construction Total
Engineering, Environmental, Field Investigation (15% construction cost) Construction Management & Administration (15% construction cost) Riverview Mobile Home Estates
Water System
Affordability Study
FINAL
JANUARY 2023
Prepared for:
RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES OWNERS
8200 Jantzen Road
Modesto, CA 95357
Prepared by:
BLACK WATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
602 Lyell Drive
Modesto, CA 95356
(209) 322-1820
Attachment C
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Purpose .........................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Existing Water System ..................................................................................................................1
1.3 Scope.............................................................................................................................................1 2 Background...........................................................................................................................................3
2.1 Problem Description .....................................................................................................................3
2.2 Consolidation Alternatives............................................................................................................3 3 Funding Assistance Eligibility ................................................................................................................4 4 RMHE - Revenues and Projected Growth.............................................................................................6
4.1 Existing Water Rates and Revenues..............................................................................................6
4.2 Customer Growth..........................................................................................................................7 5 Affordability/Funding Evaluation..........................................................................................................7
5.1 Scenario 1 Funding Evaluation ($60,000 per connection)............................................................8
5.2 Scenario 2 Funding Evaluation ($80,000 per connection)............................................................8
5.3 Construction Costs........................................................................................................................9
5.4 Consolidation Incentives.............................................................................................................10
5.5 Operations and Maintenance Costs............................................................................................10
5.6 City of Hughson - Monthly Cost Per Connection ........................................................................11
5.7 Water Rate Affordability.............................................................................................................11 6 References..........................................................................................................................................12
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 - Consolidation Responses Summary............................................................................................4 Table 3-1 - Construction Project Financial Limitations (Part 1) [3]...............................................................5 Table 3-2 - Construction Project Financial Limitations (Part 2) [3]...............................................................6 Table 4-1 - Summary of Connections, Water Usage, and Water Rates........................................................7 Table 5-1 - Maximum Affordable Water Rate...............................................................................................8 Table 5-2 - Monthly Cost per Connection for Scenario 1 and Scenario 2.....................................................9 Table 5-3 - Estimated Construction Cost ....................................................................................................10 Table 5-4 - Estimated RMHE Projected Revenues and Monthly Water Rate .............................................11 Table 5-5 - Comparison of Water Rates......................................................................................................12
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 - Project Location.........................................................................................................................2 Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
ii
APPENDICES
Appendix A Riverview Mobile Home Estates Cost/Revenue Evaluation Technical Memo Appendix B Domestic Water Supply Permit
Appendix C Water Consolidation Outreach
Appendix D July 2021 Water and Billing Data
Appendix E Self-Help Enterprises RMHE MHI Survey DFA Approval Appendix F City of Hughson - May 9, 2022 Technical Memorandum Appendix G City of Hughson - Utility Billing Charges
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
1 1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
This Riverview Mobile Home Estates (RMHE) Water System Affordability Study (Study) was prepared for RMHE by Black Water Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Black Water) with the following major objectives:
1. Evaluate and estimate the financial impacts to RMHE customers for water service costs as a result of water service consolidation with the City of Hughson (City).
2. Evaluate water rate structures for the recommended project.
The water rates discussed herein were developed using the City’s existing rate schedule and the recommendations proposed in the Riverview Mobile Home Estates Cost/Revenue Evaluation Technical Memo (Cost/Revenue Evaluation), prepared by the City of Hughson’s Water Engineer (Water Engineer) in December 2022. The future operation and maintenance costs are based on the proposed infrastructure improvements required to serve RMHE customers, as outlined in the Cost/Revenue Evaluation. The Cost/Revenue Evaluation is provided in Appendix A.
1.2 Existing Water System
The RMHE Water System (Water System) is a community water system that is privately owned and located approximately 1 mile south of State Route 132 in Modesto, California. Refer to Figure 1-1 for the RMHE Water System and project location. The Water System provides potable water to approximately 540 residents and consists of 173 active service connections that supply potable water to 170 mobile home spaces, a manager’s office/clubhouse, one office restroom, and the laundry facility.
RMHE was issued a Domestic Water Supply Permit (Permit) for Public Water System No. 5000090 by Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources (County DER) on March 17, 2016, under permit number 2016-03-005. A copy of the Permit is provided in Appendix B.
1.3 Scope
The following tasks were completed as part of this Project:
1. A review of financial documents and existing water rates for the Water System and all feasible consolidation options.
2. Review the consolidation proposals of each water agency.
3. Determine revenues from existing City of Hughson customer rates and information provided in the Cost/Revenue Evaluation.
4. Team coordination, conference calls, and meetings with consolidating agencies and project stakeholders.
602 LYELL DRIVE, MODESTO, CA 95356 PH. 209.322.1820
I:\J20291 RIVERVIEW MOBILE ESTATES\CAD\TASK-02 RIVERVIEW WATER SYSTEM\REPORTS\ENGINEERING REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 1-PROJECT LOCATION.DWG PLOT: 2/9/2021 9:13:24 AM BY GUSTAVO MANCILLA FIGURE 1-1
RIVERVIEW
MOBILE HOME ESTATES
WATER SYSTEM
LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
LOCATION
STANISLAUS COUNTY
SCALE: NTS
HWY 132 / YOSEMITE BLVD GEER RD GEER RD
E HATCH RD
SANTA FE AVE
PROJECT LOCATION
RIVERVIEW
MOBILE HOME ESTATES
WATER SYSTEM
JANTZEN RD ALBERS RD WEYER RD
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
3 2 Background
This Study evaluates the financial affordability and costs/revenues of the feasible consolidation alternatives evaluated in the Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System Feasibility Study Report (Project Report) [1], prepared by Black Water in April 2021. The Project Report was funded as part of the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Proposition 1 Technical Assistance (TA) Work Plan through the Community Development and Technical Assistance Program Agreement No. D-16-12802, TA Work Plan No. 6202-A. Various consolidation alternatives were evaluated along with other project alternatives to determine strategies for future improvements to the existing Water System to address identified deficiencies.
Background information regarding the Water System deficiencies and recommended consolidation alternatives are discussed in further detail in this section.
2.1 Problem Description
The Water System was issued County Compliance Order No. DER-16CO-006 for uranium concentrations exceeding the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 20 pCi/L in the groundwatersupply on May 10, 2016.
The original sample was collected in June 2015 from groundwater produced by the South Well.
The County DER determined that the Water System violated the California Health and Safety Code, Section 116555 and Section 64442, Title 22, CCR, since the water produced by the South Well during the monitoring period exceeded the uranium MCL on average. More recent samples taken from each active well in 2018 show both the South Well and South West Well exceeded the uranium MCL. The RMHE Owners post a Public Health Notice each quarter for exceedance of the 20 pCi/L MCL established for uranium, the first having been issued in September 2016.
2.2 Consolidation Alternatives
Three consolidation options were evaluated in the Project Report to connect to a community water system near the Riverview Mobile Home Estates. The three water systems within four miles, which were evaluated in the Project Report, include the following:
• City of Hughson
• City of Modesto-owned water system in the unincorporated County island town of Empire (Empire)
• Stanislaus Regional Water Authority (SRWA)
Since the completion of the Project Report, a fourth consolidation option was contacted and considered as part of this Study. The fourth consolidation option considered in this Study is the City of Waterford. The State has requested this Study be prepared to develop costs and benefits for each consolidation agency that is willing to provide potable water to RMHE. The distance from the RMHE water system to the estimated nearest connection point (force main) of each consolidating agency is provided in Table 2-1. In addition, the responses from the four consolidation options are documented in Table 2-1. A record of outreach conducted for each water agency is included in Appendix C.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
4 Table 2-1 - Consolidation Responses Summary
Consolidating
Agency
Distance to nearest
connection point
(miles)
Response to Initial Consolidation Public Outreach
Hughson 1.94
The City of Hughson has expressed interest and willingness to consolidate with RMHE. Consolidation is feasible if water system capacity is increased with the improvements detailed in the Cost/Revenue Evaluation.
Empire 3.89 Consolidation is not feasible because of the distance between Empire and RMHE and insufficient water capacity.
SRWA 1.26
Consolidation is not feasible because RMHE is outside of the Turlock Irrigation District (TID) service area. All water deliveries by the SRWA must be within the TID service area per water rights agreement.
Waterford 3.70 Consolidation is not feasible because of the distance between Waterford and RMHE and insufficient water capacity.
Per the Project Report, the selected project was the consolidation of the RMHE water system with SRWA.
However, based on additional correspondence with the individual consolidation agencies, the selected project has changed, and a new consolidation alternative has been selected as a part of this Study.
Following the conduction of outreach to each consolidation agency, it was determined that only the City of Hughson is willing and capable, with the implementation of the specified improvements, of providing potable water to RMHE. Although the City of Hughson is willing to consolidate with the RMHE Water System, the City has requested justification and assurances that the consolidation will not negatively impact the City financially or over-burden the existing operation and maintenance staff and budget.
Ongoing correspondence has been conducted with the City of Hughson Staff for this purpose and the City of Hughson prepared the Cost/Revenue Evaluation to outline anticipated budgetary impacts and revenues from RMHE customers. A primary goal of this Study is to provide the City with assurances regarding the affordability of the consolidation for both RMHE and the City of Hughson. 3 Funding Assistance Eligibility
Table 3-1 and Table 3-2 show the criteria that will dictate if the RMHE is eligible for the PF/grant funding as defined in the State of California Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Intended Use Plan State Fiscal Year 2022-23 (2022-23 IUP) [3]. The Division of Financial Assistance (DFA) intends to commit funds to Category A-C projects or consolidation projects.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
5 Table 3-1 - Construction Project Financial Limitations (Part 1) [3] Maximum PF, Grant or Combination Thereof Per Construction Project 38, 39 Type of Community40
Residential Water
Rates as a Percentage
of MHI 41
Percentage of
Total Eligible
Project Cost
Maximum Amount Per
Connection42,43, 44
Category A – C and/or Consolidation Projects45
Small DAC/SDAC;
Eligible NTNC46 That Serves a
Small DAC/SDAC; Expanded
Small DAC/SDAC; Medium
DAC/SDAC;47 or Small NonDAC with MHI < 150% of
Statewide MHI
N/A
up to 100%
$60,000 48
Expanded Small DAC/SDAC or
Small Non-DAC up to 75%37
Category D – F Projects
Small DAC/SDAC or Eligible
NTNC That Serves a Small
DAC/SDAC
N/A up to 100% $45,000
Expanded Small DAC/SDAC
>=1.5%
<1.5% Not Eligible for PF, Grant or Combination
Thereof 38 The Deputy Director of DFA has the discretion to apply grant and PF limitations from the 2021-22 DWSRF IUP, adopted June 15, 2021, to projects with complete applications submitted to DFA before March 15, 2022. 39 Not applicable to ASADRA funding, EC/PFAS funding, or LSLR funding. 40 See Section I.D. of this IUP for the specific definitions of each type of community. Eligibility for PF or grant may be based on the community that will be served by the project rather than the funding recipient, if consistent with the requirements of the funding source. If eligibility depends on rates, then adopted rates that will apply upon completion of construction may be considered. Eligibility is subject to limitations depending on the funding source. For example, at the time of adoption of this IUP, PF may be provided to DACs. PF may only be provided to a CPUC-regulated water corporation that serves DACs with fewer than 3,300 service connections, with consideration of such system’s rate of return for three fiscal years (Health & Saf. Code, section 116761.20(b).). 41 For the purposes of a consolidation project, the residential water rate of the Receiving Water System may be considered. For systems that do not charge monthly water rates, including, but not limited to, migratory labor camps, mobile home parks, or tribes, residential water rates as a percentage of MHI is considered not applicable and DFA may approve State Grant/PF funding per other limitations specified above.
42 The Deputy Director of DFA may approve financing for construction projects with a total eligible project cost up to $6,000,000 regardless of the amount per connection.
43 The maximum grant/PF is based on all funding the community receives in a five-year period. This includes planning, TA, and construction funding for all DWSRF projects for the community, but not GWGP funds. 44 Construction projects that receive only Prop 1 and Prop 68 grant funds shall be limited to $5,000,000 per project ($20,000,000 limit for projects that provide regional benefits or are shared among multiple entities). 45 Funding priority will be given to Category A-C Projects and consolidation projects. For consolidation projects, grant/PF eligibility may be determined based on the Subsumed Water System, although the recipient must be eligible under the applicable funding source. Throughout this document, Category A-C Projects may include projects that will address DAC/SDAC state small water systems or domestic wells with water quality or quantity issues deemed equivalent to Category A-C to the extent eligible under the applicable funding source. To be eligible for funding for a consolidation of a state small water system or individual residences, the Receiving Water System need not be one of the specified types of communities, but must be eligible under the funding source.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
6 46 For NTNC requirements, see section III.A.3.c
47 Funding priority will be given to projects that serve Small DACs/SDACs and Expanded Small DACs /SDACs. Projects for Medium DACs/SDACs and eligible Small Non-DACs may receive a maximum grant of $20 million per project, unless the Deputy Director of DFA approves a case-by-case exception for good cause. 48 The Deputy Director of DFA may approve up to $80,000 per connection for good cause.
Table 3-2 - Construction Project Financial Limitations (Part 2) [3] Repayable Construction Financing Terms
Type of Community
Residential Water
Rates as a
Percentage of MHI
Interest
Rate
Maximum
Financing
Term49
Local Cost
Share 50
Small SDAC or Eligible NTNC
That Serves a Small DAC N/A
0%
40 Years Waived
Small DAC or Expanded
Small DAC/SDAC
>=1.5%
<1.5%
½ General
Obligation
Bond Rate
49 Financing Term shall not exceed the useful life of the facilities being financed. 50 The applicant may choose to fund the remainder of the total project cost (Local Cost Share) from other sources (e.g., repayable DWSRF/Prop 1/Prop 68 financing; grant funding from sources other than the State Water Board; or other sources).
4 RMHE - Revenues and Projected Growth
This section describes the current financial revenue sources for RMHE. Financial statements were not provided by RMHE, so the projected revenue was estimated by using water usage from July 2021.
4.1 Existing Water Rates and Revenues
The RMHE has a metered water system and charges customers for water based on monthly usage. Every customer is billed a service charge of $5.80 per month. Per recent billing rate statements from the RMHE, customers are charged $0.70 per 1,000 gallons in addition to the flat-rate service charge. Based on common area water usage data provided by RMHE for July 2021, the average monthly water usage per customer is 5,800 gallons. The monthly water usage data is based on billing data for the mobile home residents and does not include irrigation water usage. The billing and water usage data is included in Appendix D.
Based on email correspondence with the RMHE Owner, Bill Ebert, the mobile home park has historically mandated an annual increase to the base rent for a mobile home space at or below the consumer price index. While the RMHE has increased annual space rental prices, the RMHE has not mandated an annual increase to the customer water rates. Over the past four years, the average annual rent increase was approximately $19/mobile home rental space. The base rent is currently set at $635/month.
The RMHE owner is planning to raise the base water rate by $30 in 2023 rather than increasing the base rent per space and increase the excess water usage from $0.70 to $2.21 per 1,000 gallons of use. By doing Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
7 this, the flat service charge would increase to $35.80 and the average water rate to the RMHE residents would be approximately $48.62 per month. The new water rate for RMHE customers of $48.62 per month will be implemented in March 2023. A summary of connections, average water usage, and associated water rates for RMHE are shown in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 - Summary of Connections, Water Usage, and Water Rates Description Value Unit
Flat Service Charge 35.80 $/month
Water Usage Billing Rate 2.21 $/1,000 gallons
Average Water Usage for one customer 5,800 gallons/month Average Monthly Water Bill for one customer 48.62 $/month RMHE Water Service Lines 173 service connections
Total Projected Monthly Revenue from Water Rates $8,410.91 Total Projected Yearly Revenue from Water Rates $100,930.97
4.2 Customer Growth
As a mobile home park with a set footprint and number of rentable spaces available, RMHE is not anticipated to experience customer growth. There is an open space of land owned by RMHE on the northwest side of the property. However, based on conversations with the owner, there are no plans to expand the mobile home park footprint at this time.
5 Affordability/Funding Evaluation
A Median Household Income (MHI) survey and final report documenting the median household income was completed by SHE in August 2020. According to the final report, a survey was conducted on July 20, 2020, and based on the results, the annual MHI for the community of RMHE was determined to be $35,000. The RMHE MHI survey, final report, and DFA approval are provided in Appendix E. As stated in the 2021 Drinking Water Affordability Assessment, a severely disadvantaged community (SDAC) is defined as a community water system in which the MHI is less than 60% of the statewide median household income. The 2020 United States Census Bureau lists the statewide MHI as $78,672. Therefore, RMHE is considered a SDAC.
The maximum affordable water rate for RMHE is based on information presented in the 2021 Drinking Water Affordability Assessment. Based on the 2021 Drinking Water Affordability Assessment published by the California Water Boards, the minimum affordability threshold is 1.5% of a community’s MHI and the maximum affordability threshold is set at 2.5% MHI. For the RMHE, this correlates to a minimum affordable water rate of $43.75 and a maximum affordable water rate of $72.92 per month. While exceeding these thresholds alone does not mean that water charges are unaffordable for a community, the 1.5% and 2.5% MHI affordability thresholds allow for a preliminary evaluation of systems that may have challenges with affordable customer charges. See Table 5-1 for a breakdown of the affordable water rates for RMHE.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
8 Table 5-1 - Maximum Affordable Water Rate
Item Quantity
Median Household Income (MHI) $35,000/year1
Affordability Threshold 1.5% - 2.5% of MHI2
Minimum Affordable Water Rate $43.75/month
Maximum Affordable Water Rate $72.92/month
1Based on email correspondence with Himali Rodrigo, Water Resource Control Engineer at State Water Resources Control Board.
22021 Drinking Water Affordability Assessment, California Water Boards, April 2021.
This Study evaluates consolidation of the RMHE water system with the City water system. Based on the 2022-23 IUP, consolidation projects are eligible for grant funding, regardless of the project category. No income survey is required for this alternative. In addition, for consolidation projects, there is no requirement for the residential water rates to meet a percentage criterion based on the MHI. According to Table 3-1, DFA may approve $60,000 per connection, or up to $80,000 per connection for good cause of the construction project (see Note 48). In addition, the project is eligible for 100% grant funding of the total project eligible cost, since RMHE is classified as a SDAC. At 173 service connections, RMHE would be eligible for up to $10.56 million with $60,000 per connection in grant funding. If granted the higher funding amount per connection for good cause, RMHE would be eligible for up to $14.08 million with $80,000 per connection in grant funding. These two consolidation scenarios are evaluated further in Section 5.1 and Section 5.2.
5.1 Scenario 1 Funding Evaluation ($60,000 per connection) For Scenario 1, the RMHE may be eligible for 100% of the total project cost up to a maximum of $60,000 per connection. The RMHE would be eligible for a maximum grant amount of $10,380,000 based on the 173 service connections. The remaining cost of the project would be paid for by a 0% interest loan over a 40-year period. Scenario 1 evaluates the consolidation with the City if the estimated construction costs exceed the eligible grant amount allocated by $60,000 per connection for a total of $10.38 million. In this instance, RMHE would be eligible for a 0% interest loan over a 40-year period to cover the remaining construction cost of $1.76 million. With the 0% interest loan over a 40-year period, the monthly RMHE water rates would increase by $21 per connection. See Table 5-2 for a breakdown of the construction costs and funding outcomes.
5.2 Scenario 2 Funding Evaluation ($80,000 per connection) Per the 2022-23 IUP, the Deputy Director of DFA may approve up to $80,000 per connection for good cause. If this is the case, for Scenario 2, the RMHE may be eligible for 100% of the total project cost up to a maximum of $80,000 per connection. In Scenario 2, the RMHE would be eligible for a maximum grant amount of $13,840,000 based on the 173 service connections. Since the eligible grant amount would be higher than the estimated construction cost estimate, RMHE would not need to use a loan to cover the remaining costs in this scenario. See Table 5-2 for a breakdown of the construction costs and funding outcomes.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
9 Table 5-2 - Monthly Cost per Connection for Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 Consolidation Consolidation
(Scenario 1) (Scenario 2)
Funding
Total Capital Cost1 $12,350,261 $12,350,261
Number of Connections 173 173
Amount Per Connection $60,000 $80,000
Maximum Grant Available 2,3 $10,380,000 $13,840,000
Loan Payment
Total Loan Amount4 $1,970,261 $0
Interest Rate 0.0% N/A
Number of Years 40 N/A
Annual Amount $49,257 $0
Monthly Amount $4,105 $0 1Refer to Section 5.3 and Table 5-3 for an explanation of the construction costs. 2Eligible for 100% of the total project cost up to a maximum amount of $60,000 per connection.
At 173 service connections, RMHE would be eligible up to $10.38 million. 3Eligible for 100% of the total project cost up to a maximum amount of $80,000 per connection.
At 173 service connections, RMHE would be eligible up to $13.84 million. 4The total loan amount is equal to total capital cost minus the grant available.
5.3 Construction Costs
The estimated cost for connecting to the City water system was calculated as $4,117,542 in the April 2021 Project Report. These costs include the extension of water service from the Hughson water system to connect to the RMHE system and disconnection and destruction of the existing groundwater wells. Based on the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index, construction prices have increased by 18% since April 2021. The adjusted estimated cost is $4,850,261.
In addition to the improvements to extend water service to RMHE, the City has stated that the water system does not have the required capacity to serve RMHE and needs to expand its facilities to supply potable water to the RMHE. The estimated cost for expanding the facilities is $7,500,000, as detailed in the Riverview Mobile Estates Sewer & Water Consolidation Project Technical Memo (Technical Memo), prepared by the Water Engineer in May 2022 and included in Appendix F. The $7,500,000 improvements would be for Phase 1 of the North Facility improvements, which will include the construction of a storage tank and booster pumps. The Affordability Study assumes that the anticipated and necessary $7.5M city improvements are eligible project costs as required for consolidation, but this has yet to be reviewed by DFA. The total estimated cost for the design and construction of the infrastructure to consolidate water service with the City and RMHE and increase capacity of the City water system is $12,350,261 as summarized in Table 5-3. Since it is unknown if RMHE will receive $60,000 per connection or $80,000 per connection in grant funding at this time, both alternatives were evaluated and represented in this Study.
The eligibility of the City Water System Improvements will be reviewed by DFA.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
10 Table 5-3 - Estimated Construction Cost
Item Amount ($)
Demolition of Existing System and Connection to Hughson Water System 4,850,261 Hughson Water System Improvements 7,500,000
Total Project Cost 12,350,261
As stated in the Cost/Revenue Evaluation, the necessary Hughson water system improvements will not result in a surcharge to RMHE customers, as it benefits both the City and RMHE. Similarly, since the $7.5M improvements will result in the need for a loan repayment component under Scenario 1 funding, we are assuming that the loan repayment will not result in a loan repayment surcharge to RMHE customers, as it benefits both the City and RMHE. In the event of consolidation between the two water systems, the City of Hughson can determine how the loan repayment will impact existing water rates and how it is divided amongst customers, which will include RMHE.
5.4 Consolidation Incentives
Per the 2022-23 IUP and separate from this project, the City of Hughson is eligible for State Water Board funds offered as incentives to Receiving Water Systems (City of Hughson) in exchange for completing consolidation (Consolidation Incentives). If a public water system (PWS) completes a physical consolidation of an existing PWS(s) or a community (at least 15 year-round residential service connections or a year-round population of at least 25 people) not currently served by a PWS, the Consolidation Incentives DFA is authorized to offer a Receiving Water System the following, but not limited to:
• Up to $10 million in zero percent (0%) interest rate financing per consolidated community/water system from available sources for planning or construction of an Incentive Project; and • Grant/PF funding for an Incentive Project of up to $3,000 per connection when consolidating a community water system that does not qualify as a Small DAC, $5,000 per connection when consolidating a community/water system that qualifies as a small DAC, or up to $10,000 per connection when consolidating a community/water system that qualifies as a Small SDAC.
Maximum of $5 million grant/PF per consolidated community/water system.
The Consolidation Incentives are subject to DFA approval. As stated in the previous section, the Affordability Study assumes that the $7.5M city improvements are eligible project costs as required for consolidation but have yet to be reviewed by DFA.
5.5 Operations and Maintenance Costs
The 2022-2023 water operations budget for the City is $1,528,624. The City of Hughson conducted a Cost/Revenue Evaluation in December 2022 that includes a cost analysis of operating and maintaining the proposed facilities necessary to provide potable water to RMHE, recommendations for RMHE water rates to ensure all costs are recovered through RMHE revenues, and an overall quantification of replacement costs dedicated to RMHE. As part of the Cost/Revenue Evaluation, the City was able to determine the additional costs applicable to RMHE only, in addition to the City-wide water rate based on RMHE’s proportional share of these costs.
Of the necessary improvements needed to improve the City water system to connect to the RMHE and City water systems, the proposed transmission pipeline will be constructed for the sole benefit of RMHE.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
11 Therefore, the operation and maintenance costs associated with the pipeline will be the responsibility of RMHE. The Cost/Revenue Evaluation provides a breakdown of the estimated operation and maintenance, repair, and replacement costs associated with the proposed pipeline, which resulted in an annual cost of $14,775. The estimated annual cost translates to a monthly surcharge of $7.18 per connection.
5.6 City of Hughson - Monthly Cost Per Connection
The City monthly utility billing charges for water are included in Appendix G. However, the RMHE revenue projections and estimated monthly water rate is based on the assumptions presented above and in the Cost/Rate Evaluation. Although City of Hughson residents pay a fixed rate of $38.20 per month, the Cost/Revenue Evaluation states that a monthly fixed fee of $30.00 per connection will be assumed for the RMHE, with no change to the existing City volume rate of $2.21 per 1,000 gallons of water used. As presented in the previous section, the operation and maintenance surcharge of $7.81 was added per month per customer. Since the existing RMHE well will be demolished, a landscaping fee was assumed and applied to the RMHE project revenues. The landscaping water rate will incur a monthly fixed fee of $127.34, assuming a 1.5-inch diameter connection and servicing a 0.7 acre turf area, with the same City volume rate of $2.21 per 1,000 gallons of water used. The total estimated RMHE revenue projections and monthly water rate are given in the Cost/Revenue Evaluation and expanded upon in Table 5-4.
Table 5-4 - Estimated RMHE Projected Revenues and Monthly Water Rate Description Value Unit
Residential Flat Service Charge 30.00 $/month
Water Usage Billing Rate 2.21 $/1,000 gallons
Average Water Usage for one customer 5.80 1,000 gallons/month Operation and Maintenance Surcharge per customer 7.18 $/month Average Water Bill for one customer (Scenario 1) 50.00 $/month Average Water Bill for one customer (Scenario 2) 50.00 $/month RMHE Residential Water Service Lines 173 service connections Total Monthly Residential Water Rate Revenues 8,649.65 $/month Landscaping Flat Service Charge 127.34 $/month
Average Water Usage for Landscaping 76.00 1,000 gallons/month Total Monthly Landscaping Water Rate Revenues 295.30 $/month Landscaping Water Rate for one customer (if applied) 1.71 $/month Total Projected Monthly Revenue from All Water Rates 8,944.95 $/month Total Projected Yearly Revenue from All Water Rates $107,339.45 $/year Based on the unit rates defined in the table, the monthly cost of water service per mobile home unit connection under Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 is $42.82, plus the operation and maintenance surcharge of $7.18, for a total monthly water rate of $50.00 per RMHE customer. RMHE owners would also be responsible for the projected monthly landscaping water rate of $295.30. If the monthly landscaping water rate was applied to the customers, it would result in an increase of $1.71 per customer.
5.7 Water Rate Affordability
Table 5-5 shows a comparison of the RMHE water rates, the anticipated water rates after consolidation with the City of Hughson under Scenario 1, the anticipated water rates after consolidation with the City Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
12 of Hughson under Scenario 2, and the minimum and maximum affordable water rate for RMHE. It is likely the Scenario 1 will result in an increased water rate due to the loan repayment component, but this will be determined by the City of Hughson. For the purposes of this Study, no loan repayment surcharge was applied to the water rates under Scenario 1 funding. As shown in Table 5-5, if the RMHE consolidates with the City, the average monthly water bill for RMHE customers will exceed the minimum affordable water rate for the community but will be below the maximum affordable water rate for both funding scenarios.
Table 5-5 - Comparison of Water Rates
Description Value Unit
RMHE Average Monthly Water Bill (as of March 2023) 48.62 $/customer/month RMHE Average Monthly Water Bill w/ City of Hughson (Scenario 1) 50.00 $/customer/month RMHE Average Monthly Water Bill w/ City of Hughson (Scenario 2) 50.00 $/customer/month Minimum Affordable Water Rate for RMHE 43.75 $/month
Maximum Affordable Water Rate for RMHE 72.92 $/month
6 References
[1] Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System Feasibility Study Report, Black Water Consulting Engineers, Inc., April 1, 2021.
[2] 2021 Drinking Water Affordability Assessment, California Water Boards, April 2021. [3] State of California Drinking Water State Revolving Fund - Intended Use Plan State Fiscal Year 2022- 23, Division of Financial Assistance – State Water Resources Control Board, October 2022 Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
A
Appendix A
Riverview Mobile Home Estates
Cost/Revenue Evaluation Technical Memo
RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES COST/REVENUE EVALUATION 1
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
December 29, 2022
To: Merry Mayhew, City Manager
From: Cort Abney, City Water Engineer
Subject: Riverview Mobile Home Estates Cost/Revenue Evaluation The Riverview Mobile Home Estates (RMHE) is a privately owned development located approximately one mile northeast of the City of Hughson. The development currently consists of 174 mobile homes, a management building, and a soccer/playfield. RMHE owns and operates its own water and sewer systems, and water for the development is supplied by a single RMHE well.
In 2016, RMHE was issued a compliance order to address uranium contamination in the water supply.
Uranium is a naturally occurring mineral found in groundwater. Uranium can be removed, but the treatment process is normally expensive to install and operate.
Rather than build a treatment facility, State regulators prefer RMHE find a local water purveyor willing to provide water (“consolidate”) to RMHE to avoid the complexities associated with groundwater treatment. Four consolidation options were evaluated to determine which local water systems, if any, would be candidates to serve water to RMHE, including:
• City of Hughson
• City of Modesto owned water system in the unincorporated County island town of Empire • Stanislaus Regional Water Authority
• City of Waterford
The State’s evaluation concluded that the City of Hughson is the only feasible water system available to provide RMHE potable water. Subsequently, the City of Hughson began discussions with representatives from the State of California WaterBoard, County of Stanislaus Environmental Health, and RMHE to develop a conceptual consolidation project involving Hughson serving RMHE. Currently, discussions are focused on the financial impacts to both parties.
The purpose of this technical memorandum is to identify budgetary expenses, rates, and revenues associated with the proposed consolidation project, whereby Hughson provides a potable water supply to RMHE.
Background
One of the challenges associated with consolidating RHME with Hughson is the current lack of surplus water in the Hughson water system. With completion of current water supply projects (Well 7 Replacement, Well 8 GAC Treatment), Hughson will have sufficient water for existing customers and approved developments, but no surplus supply. As part of a consolidation project, the City has asked RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES COST/REVENUE EVALUATION 2 that grant funding be provided to Hughson for construction of a new water tank and associated improvements (“North Storage Tank”), thereby increasing water supply capacity and allowing service to RMHE. Construction of the North Storage Tank will leave the City with additional water capacity after RMHE demands are met. However, the City will be responsible to incur the full cost of operating and maintaining the facility in perpetuity.
Consolidation of RMHE will require construction of approximately 7,000 lineal feet of pipeline from the proposed North Storage Tank to RMHE, of which approximately 5,800 lineal feet will be used for the sole purpose of serving RMHE (“RMHE pipeline”). Although the cost of operating and maintaining a new RMHE pipeline are relatively minor, Hughson will be responsible for these costs in perpetuity as well.
Cost impacts to both Hughson (construction, operating, and replacing infrastructure) and RHME (affordability) are being assessed. All stakeholders currently agree that all construction costs for the North Storage Tank and RMHE pipeline, including planning, engineering, inspection, environmental, etc., will be provided through grant funding by the State Waterboard.
The following provides a cost analysis including operating and maintaining the proposed North Storage Tank and RMHE pipeline, and recommendations for RMHE water rates to ensure all costs are fully recovered through RMHE revenues.
Operation and Maintenance Costs
The cost to own, operate, and maintain the proposed North Storage Tank and RMHE pipeline were estimated based, in part, on the following assumptions:
• The North Storage Tank will require 1.5 operator hour daily x 5 days per week, on average; 1 • The RMHE pipeline (dedicated section) will require 1 operator hour per week, on average; 2 • The cost to employ a City operator is $51.44 per hour; • Hughson will not be required to maintain existing RHME water distribution system; 3 • Current RMHE water demand is 40 acre-feet per year; 4 • RMHE will require a single 3” compound master meter;
• Completion of infrastructure for RMHE will occur in June, 2026; 5 The conceptual consolidation project includes a single (master) water meter to serve RMHE (located on Geer Road), allowing Hughson to send one water bill to the RMHE development in accordance with the Hughson water rate schedule. Additionally, a surcharge may be appropriate to itemize any costs for operating and maintaining infrastructure constructed for the sole purpose of providing water to RHME.
Since the North Storage Tank facility will benefit both Hughson residents as well as RHME, a surcharge is not be proposed. The cost of maintaining this facility would be included in the RHME water rate. 1 Operators visit facility once per day during the week (1 hour) to check for proper operation (no leaks, no vandalism, instruments working property, etc.), with more extensive maintenance performed periodically (weed control, cleaning, routine repairs and maintenance, etc.), requiring 2-8 hours labor. 2 Operator time for USA marking, checking/maintaining ARV’s, testing for disinfection levels at meter, read meter, valve exercising, etc. 3 Including, but not limited to, water quality testing for copper, lead, or routine coliform testing, leak repair, etc. 4 5,800 gpm per month/unit x 174 units, plus 0.7 aces x 4.0 acre-feet/acre. Increases in demand due to future growth will be limited as established in water supply service agreements. 5 Grant approval 1/24; engineering design 10/24; project award 3/25; construction completion 6/26.
RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES COST/REVENUE EVALUATION 3 However, a surcharge is appropriate for operation and maintenance of the dedicated RHME pipeline in Geer Road, located between Hatch Road and RHME.
North Storage Tank
At completion (June, 2026), it is assumed the North Storage Tank will primarily benefit RMHE. Based on the assumptions listed above, the labor cost to operate and maintain the proposed North Storage Tank facility is $20,062 per year. 6 Future City development projects will utilize the facility’s surplus capacity within 5-10 years following completion. Hence, no surcharge is recommended for the North Storage Tank, as it benefits both City and RMHE.
RMHE Pipeline
Since the RMHE pipeline will be constructed for the sole benefit of RMHE, the costs associated with the pipeline should be the responsibility of RMHE. Costs include regular and scheduled maintenance, unscheduled maintenance and repairs, and future replacement. The cost of normal operation and maintenance were estimated as $2,675 per year.7 Costs associated with unscheduled maintenance and repairs were assumed as $25,000 every 20 years. 8
The cost of replacing the pipeline and appurtenances was developed based on unit prices developed in the “Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System, Feasibility Study Report”, dated April, 2021. The following table includes a cost estimate for the dedicated RMHE section of pipe and appurtenances.
Lump sum prices shown are proportional to the pipeline quantity associated with the RMHE pipeline.
RMHE Pipeline Cost Estimate
Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Cost
Mobilization/Demobilization L.S. 68,400 1 $68,400
Sheeting and Shoring L.S. 71,250 1 71,250
Traffic Control L.S. 21,660 1 21,600
12” C900 Pipeline L.F. 160 5,800 928,000
12” Gate Valves Ea. 2,650 5 13,250
Pavement Restoration L.F. 44.00 4,800 a 211,200
Disinfection and Testing L.S. 10,000 1 5,700
Construction Cost $1,319,400
Engineering, Inspection, etc. 30% of construction cost 395,820 Total Project Cost $1,715,220
a. Approximately 600 l.f. of pipeline assumed to be located in a conductor casing within the Tuolumne Bridge crossing.
Based on the estimated cost of construction, an annual replacement contribution of $11,230 is needed to fund replacement of the pipeline at the end if its useful life. 9 6 390 labor hours per year x $51.44 per hour. Add $2,050 electrical and $1,300 chemical for RHME water delivery. 7 1 hour per week x 52 x $51.44 per hour 8 “Unscheduled maintenance” includes leak repairs, replacing damaged appurtenances (i.e. fire hydrant, air release valve, gate valves, etc.). Annual cost of $1,081, assuming 3.5% rate of return and 2% inflation. 9 Annual cost of $11,230, assuming 80 year life cycle, 3.5% rate of return and 2% inflation.
RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES COST/REVENUE EVALUATION 4 Total estimated costs for RMHE pipeline operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement is $14,775 per year, resulting in a monthly surcharge of $7.18 per month per connection, as shown in the following table.
RMHE Pipeline Surcharge Cost Estimate
Description Estimated Cost Annual Cost Monthly Cost per Unit 10
Regular and scheduled Maintenance $2,675 per year $2,675 $1.28 Unscheduled maintenance and repairs $25,000 every 20 years $1,081 $0.52 Replacement Cost $1,715,220 @ 80 years $11,230 $5.38
Total Surcharge $14,795 $7.18
RMHE Rates and Revenues
Water rates should be set to allow full cost recovery by City for water service. It will be equally important to maintain rates that are affordable for RMHE residents. In general, RMHE residents should expect to pay water rates that are similar to City residents, and be subject to all future City rate adjustments, conservation requirements, and other City water program codes and conditions.
In 2018, the State of California approved SB7 requiring individual water meters (“submeters”) be installed on all new multi-family residential units or mixed commercial and multifamily units, even if water is being provided to the development through a single “master” meter. The City recently approved the first multi-family project that requires submetering, in accordance with SB7. The City has yet to determine how submeters and associated data will factor into water rates. However, a new multifamily water rate that more closely reflects existing City residential water rates is being explored.
Although a mobile home park is classified as “manufactured homes” rather than “multi-family”, both are considered residential housing. To ensure that water rates paid by all residents of Hughson be fair and equitable, regardless of the type of housing, an additional rate tier may be necessary.
Using the current master meter rate structure (single large meter) to bill RMHE would result in a fixed water rate significantly less than what current Hughson residents incur. Consolidation agreements should set RMHE water rates to be consistent with City residential rates. Apartments and mobile homes are expected to use less water than a single family residence, consequently can use smaller water meters (e.g. 5/8” vs ¾” or 1”). A new metered connection category could be established for residents of multi-family and mobile homes, including a proportionally adjusted fixed rate component. For developments with a master meter, including RMHE, each unit would pay the fixed monthly fee, but water use would be billed based on the master meter reading. Currently, City residents pay a fixed rate of $38.20, plus $2.21 per 1,000 gallons of water used. For purposes of this analysis, a monthly fixed fee of $30.00 per connection for apartments/mobile homes was assumed, and no change to the existing volume rate.
RMHE revenue projections using assumptions described above are shown in the following table. 10 Based on 174 (current) RMHE units. Unit cost will decrease should additional units be built in the future.
RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES COST/REVENUE EVALUATION 5 RMHE Projected Revenues
Rate Unit Unit Rate Units Total Monthly Revenue
Residential
Fixed
Volumetric
Per Connection
Per 1,000 gallons
$30.00
$2.21
175 a
5.8 b
$5,250
$2,243
Landscaping
Fixed
Volumetric
Per Connection
Per 1,000 gallons
$127.34 c
$2.21
1 76 d
$127.34
$167.96
Total $7,788
a. Includes 174 mobile homes and one management office
b. Based on 5,800 gallons per month per unit x 175 units c. Assuming 1.5” connection for 0.7 acre turf area
d. Assuming 4 acre-feet per year for turf irrigation
Total projected annual revenues from RMHE are $93,456, plus replacement surcharge of $14,795. Based on the unit rates defined in the table, the monthly cost of water service per mobile home unit is $42.82, plus surcharge of $7.18, totaling $50.00. 11
Recommendations
Providing water service to RMHE represents a significant commitment by the City of Hughson, as the terms of the agreement will be perpetual. The City is evaluating all impacts to its water program should consolidation occur, including costs and revenues associated with providing water service. Consolidation agreements should ensure City residents do not support or subsidize the cost of providing RMHE water service, establish an affordable water program for RMHE residents, and propose a RMHE rate structure that is consistent with rates paid by City residents.
Construction of water infrastructure to provide service to RMHE include a new storage and pumping facility, and a dedicated pipeline on Geer Road to connect the systems. Hughson water rates account for the operation and maintenance of the water system, including wells, storage tanks, and pipelines. It can be assumed that those costs are built into the water rate schedule, and RHME water bills will pay its fair proportion to operate and maintain the water system, including the proposed North Storage Facility.
However, since the RMHE pipeline solely benefits those residents, costs associated with maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement should be borne by RMHE. It is recommended this cost be added as a surcharge to the water service rate.
Based on the analysis described in this technical memorandum, it is recommended that should the City propose consolidation with RMHE, agreements include a fixed water rate of approximately $30.00 per unit (or as established with a new rate category in the future), volumetric billing based on a single master meter using the City’s metered rate schedule, and a surcharge of $14,795 per year to recover dedicated pipeline costs.
11 For comparison, City single family residents pay approximately $70 per month for water service.
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
B
Appendix B
Domestic Water Supply Permit
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
C
Appendix C
Water Consolidation Outreach
From: Merry Mayhew
To: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards; Thania Bejarano
Cc: Juan Cano; Aja Verburg; Patrick Scott; [email protected]; Rachel Wyse; Jaime Velazquez Subject: RE: City of Hughson - Consolidation Project w/ Riverview MHE- Follow-up Date: Thursday, May 26, 2022 1:59:12 PM
Attachments: image001.png
RiverView MHP Consolidation TM 9May22.pdf
Good afternoon Dania and Thania,
Dania had stated in a previous email dated Feb 24th that DFA cannot issue a letter stating that they agree to specific construction items/tasks, until an application is submitted, but that you could follow up with DFA to gain a better understanding of what could be included as part of the construction package if we had justification with the list of potential upgrades and capacity increase.
In addition, you mentioned you could provide a more formal email detailing that those components are in fact commonly covered by the construction grant funding.
Attached please find a memo by Cort Abney, the City of Hughson’s contracted Water Engineer. This memo explains why an increase in water capacity would be required before we could take on a consolidation project such as Riverview and it lists a solution as proposed by Mr. Abney. Hopefully this will suffice for DFA to indicate if these items could be covered under construction costs, before we move forward in taking a project of this magnitude to our City Council.
I do not have a consultant that can do the same for the wastewater side of things. The issues previously listed for waste water are what our Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator has stated is needed.
You also mentioned in the Feb 24th email that there is an “entire planning application package” that the “applicant” must submit. As I have mentioned previously the City of Hughson does not have adequate staff to handle a project of this magnitude. If you need additional wastewater information or a planning application package, the City of Hughson would need someone to complete those tasks.
Sincerely,
Merry Mayhew
City Manager
City of Hughson
O: 209-883-4054
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2022 2:14 PM
To: Merry Mayhew <[email protected]>; Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> Cc: Juan Cano <[email protected]>; Aja Verburg <[email protected]>; Patrick Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Rachel Wyse <[email protected]>; Jaime Velazquez <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: City of Hughson - Consolidation Project w/ Riverview MHE- Follow-up CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good afternoon, Merry
Regarding the list of potential WWT upgrades and capacity increase to City’s WWTF, as a result of the prevision of sewer services, yes, if the City provides me with a specific WWT tasks list, I could consult with DFA and get their opinion on whether those items could potentially quality for grant funding as part of the overall WWC Project. Would be similar to what I did before (see attached MS Excel File, “WasteWater” Worksheet). Except this time the list would need to be more specific and add a brief rationale/link as to how this task would relates to the provision of sewer services (see attached MS Excel File, “WWT_Upgrades” Worksheet).
I understand to obtain City Council’s approval to move forward with these projects the Council’s members not only want to know how the provision is not going to be a burden on the City and the current residents, but often they want to see how the City will benefit from the provision of sewer services. With that said…this can be approach by providing them with an idea of what are the City’s current needs for expansion and WWT Upgrades and a brief description of how these items could potentially be cover, in part, by the grant funding of the WWC Project. As Thania described below, is our experience working on these projects, for about 2 +years now, that usually when these items are brought up to the City Council, is more of an informative item to let the members know and receive support to continue collaboration with the Regional Board and the non-profit organization. However, the outcome of the engineering and feasibility study as well as sewer rates study will ultimately dictate on weather this is an economically feasible alternative for the Riverview residents.
I would be glad to present the WWC side as an item to the City Council members and answer funding or other WWC project related questions. I am going to be out of the office the first two weeks in June though, but I will be available starting on June 21st.
Sincerely,
Dania
Dania Jimmerson, M.S., P.E.
WRCE, Wastewater Consolidation Program
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114
[email protected]
From: Merry Mayhew <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2022 2:05 PM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Cc: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; Juan Cano <[email protected]>; Aja Verburg <[email protected]>; Patrick Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Rachel Wyse <[email protected]>; Jaime Velazquez <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: City of Hughson - Consolidation Project w/ Riverview MHE- Follow-up EXTERNAL:
Thank you Thania, that’s very helpful.
Stay tuned,
Merry
On May 10, 2022, at 1:05 PM, Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good afternoon Merry,
Thank you for your response. I understand you need more information to make a decision.
I am not sure if I understood your question in regards to the Councils approval. On previous projects the Council typically votes to continue discussions about a project with a phrase as simple as “Direct staff to proceed with formal consolidation and report back project progress” on the agenda. We are not in the planning application phase yet so we do not need a resolution. Dania, please let me know if I am missing anything.
Feel free to reach out to us at any point to discuss the potential upgrades list.
Best,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises 8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Merry Mayhew <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2022 8:53 AM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Cc: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; Juan Cano <[email protected]>; Aja Verburg <[email protected]>; Patrick Scott <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Rachel Wyse <[email protected]>; Jaime Velazquez <[email protected]> Subject: RE: City of Hughson - Consolidation Project w/ Riverview MHE- Follow-up Good morning Thania,
In an email from Dania on 2/24, she stated that with additional information (potential upgrades and capacity increase to City’s WTF and WWTF), she could follow up with DFA to get a response if the particular items listed by the City can be covered under the construction costs for drinking water and wastewater consolidation projects. I have asked Cort Abney, our contracted water engineer, to put that information together on the water side. As soon as I have his memo I will send it out to the team. I don’t believe it will take much longer as he recently provided some information for another purpose.
As soon as we have a good understanding of the incentives that the State could provide should we move forward, I believe the next step would be to take an item to Council for approval to continue discussions. I do have one question on this step, does the State need Council’s approval in a resolution or is the approval of a staff report sufficient?
Sincerely,
Merry Mayhew
City Manager
City of Hughson
Office: 209-883-4054
From: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 9:25 AM
To: Merry Mayhew <[email protected]>; Rachel Wyse <[email protected]>; Jaime Velazquez <[email protected]>
Cc: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; Juan Cano <[email protected]>; Aja Verburg <[email protected]>; Patrick Scott <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: City of Hughson - Consolidation Project w/ Riverview MHE- Follow-up CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning Merry, Jaime and Rachel,
My previous email contained a lot of information. I understand the City of Hughson Staff Group is a small team, so I wanted to reach out and ask if you would like to meet sometime this month to discuss the Riverview MHE Consolidation Project? I would be happy to set-up a Zoom meeting.
If you need more time to discuss internally, I understand. Please let me know.
Best,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises 8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
image001.png
From: Thania Bejarano
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 9:54 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; Juan Cano <[email protected]>
Subject: City of Hughson - Water Consolidation Project w/ Riverview Mobile Estates - Follow-up
Good afternoon Merry, Jaime, and Rachel
I hope you are all doing well. It has been some time since we last spoke about the Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water Consolidation Project. I simply wanted to provide some new updates.
Dania, Riverview’s Consultants, and I are wrapping up Riverview’s water consolidation and septic-to-sewer outreach to nearby entities this month. I have provided our preliminary findings below.
Consolidation Outreach Findings
1. City of Hughson (COH)– Several meetings were held from January – February 2022. A list of questions and concerns was sent to the Division of Drinking Water (DDW) and the Division of Financial Assistance (DFA) to provide responses and feedback. The COH will meet internally and follow-up with SHE and the Regional Board to discuss next steps and their decision about being included in the Riverview Affordability Study.
2. SRWA – A meeting was held on March 2022. The SRWA is interested in providing drinking water to Riverview MHE. However, the SRWA’s Wholesale Water Agreement that will outline the costs and conditions for this service has not been finalized and Black Water does not have enough information to develop a cost estimate. SHE and Black Water will follow-up with the SRWA staff about sharing information to include in the Affordability Study. The SRWA can only provide drinking water services.
3. City of Modesto (COM) – A meeting was held on April 2022. The COM is not interested in a septic-to-sewer consolidation project with Riverview. Some concerns include the length of the pipeline, O&M, and billing. The COM believes Riverview has other water consolidation options that are much more feasible than Empire.
4. City of Waterford (Waterford) – A meeting was held on April 2022. At this time Waterford is not interested in a septic-to-sewer consolidation project with Riverview. The Waterford staff believes Riverview has other water consolidation options that are much more feasible than their small water system. However, they will meet internally with their team and discuss the project details. The staff will send SHE a response by the end of the month.
In addition to these updates, I wanted to communicate with the City of Hughson team that we do not expect the City to agree to both services if this is not something your staff can take on. If the City would only like to provide drinking water services or only provide sewer services to Riverview Mobile Estates, we can discuss this further. We understand that this project must be an economical and manageable option for the City to work with us. During our outreach meetings with the entities listed above an onsite wastewater treatment package plant was suggested as a manageable and costeffective option for Riverview’s sewage issues. Once the Riverview Sewer Project work plan is approved, the consultants will explore this option further. I wanted to inform you about on-site wastewater treatment package plants because I want to ensure COH team that we are looking at various options for Riverview, in addition to septic-tosewer consolidation. The project stakeholders for the Riverview Project have not made any final decisions but we would like to gather as much information from the entities we spoke to, to condense the project options available.
Apologies for the lengthy email but we appreciate your attention and consideration.
We hope to hear back from you soon.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Best,
Thania
Total Control Panel Login
To: [email protected]
From:
[email protected]
Message Score: 1 High (60): Pass
My Spam Blocking Level: High Medium (75): Pass
Low (90): Pass
Block this sender
Block selfhelpenterprises.org
This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level.
Total Control Panel Login
To: [email protected]
From:
[email protected]
Message Score: 15 High (60): Pass
My Spam Blocking Level: High Medium (75): Pass
Low (90): Pass
Block this sender
Block selfhelpenterprises.org
This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level.
From: Thania Bejarano
To: William Wong; Ben Koehler
Cc: Christiana Giedd; Jeff Daniels
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 4:45:22 PM
Attachments: image002.png
image908485.png
Thank you, Will
This information is helpful. I appreciate the quick response.
Best,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises 8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: William Wong <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 4:37 PM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>; Ben Koehler <[email protected]> Cc: Christiana Giedd <[email protected]>; Jeff Daniels <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Hi Thania,
Pretty much the same reason. They would likely need a pump station and a tank to ensure adequate water pressures to meet fire code. On top of high capital costs, I estimate that average water bill could be up to around $35-$45 per month, at the smallest meter size and assuming 10 units of water used per MH per month. https://www.modestogov.com/2397/Metered-Water-Rates
Also I recall Riverview MHP is closer to the City of Hughson than Modesto.
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 6:23 PM
To: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>; William Wong <[email protected]> Cc: Christiana Giedd <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates External Email: Please use caution when clicking links and/or opening attachments.
Good afternoon Will and Ben,
Back in April, Dania Jimmerson and I presented the Riverview Mobile Home Estates (RVMHE) Water & Sewer Consolidation Project to both of you (email chain below). I have attached the water consolidation presentation to this email.
Based on my notes you made it clear that a sewer consolidation was not possible between RVMHE and the City of Modesto (Empire) because of the following reasons.
1. Billing and management difficulties
2. High O&M costs
3. Expensive pump stations
4. Sewer rates would approximately be $60 which is unaffordable for a DAC community However, I did not capture your reasoning for not wanting to do a water consolidation with the community of Riverview. Can you provide your reasoning so that we can include these findings in our Engineering Report? Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need more information in regards to this project.
Thank you,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises 8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Thania Bejarano
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 2:02 PM
To: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; William Wong <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Good afternoon Ben,
Congratulations and thank you for letting us know. I look forward to meeting you on Tuesday.
Thank you,
Thania
From: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 9:57 AM
To: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; William Wong <[email protected]> Cc: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates I am so sorry for my delay. I have been planning a wedding for my fiancé and I and completely forget to set an out of office memo. My apologies. I have accepted the invite and will be there for the meeting on Tuesday.
Ben Koehler
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 3:11 PM
To: William Wong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Thanks, Will. I just sent you and Ben an appointment Via MS Teams for Tuesday, April 5th from 1330 to 1430 Thania Bejarano from Self Help Enterprises will be joining us as well. Thania will be covering the Drinking Water Consolidation aspects of the project. Please see agenda below, which I also included it to the MS Teams appointment.
Sincerely,
Dania
AGENDA
COORDINATION AMONG WASTEWATER CONSOLIDATION (SB 1215) – REGION 5 AND
CITY OF MODESTO WQCF
RIVERVIEW MOBILE HOME ESTATES (RIVERVIEW MHE)
05 April 2022
1330 to 1430
Zoom Meeting
Join on your computer or mobile app
Click here to join the meeting
Or call in (audio only)
+1 916-562-0861,,355124019# United States, Sacramento
Phone Conference ID: 355 124 019#
Purpose: Provide a brief overview of the Drinking and Wastewater Consolidation (WWC) Programs in terms of the funding available and clarify concerns/questions regarding the potential Riverview MHE WWC Project (septic-to-sewer).
Potential Attendees: William Wong (Director of Utilities – City of Modesto), Ben Koehler (WQCF Manager– City of Modesto), Thania Bejarano – Community Development Specialist (Self Help Enterprises - SHE), and Dania Jimmerson - Wastewater Consolidation Program Coordinator/Project Lead (Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board).
DRINKING WATER CONSOLIDATION (10 min - Thania Bejarano) Background
Funding & Incentives
WWC PROGRAM - WHAT IS NEW? (2 min - Dania Jimmerson)
FUNDING (10 min- Dania Jimmerson)
a.
What is new in terms of funding sources?
b.
How are the funds distributed?
c.
How much funding could potentially be any given project? RIVERVIEW MHE WWC PROJECT (10 min- Dania Jimmerson)
Project Background
WWC Qualification Criteria
CVRWQCB Involvement & Current Status
Next Steps
From: William Wong <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 2:48 PM
To: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates EXTERNAL:
Hi Dania,
Ben has been out of the office the past few days. 4/4/22 is out for me. Go ahead and send an invite for 4/5/22 at 1:30-2:30 to hold the meeting for now.
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 10:57 AM
To: William Wong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Importance: High
Good morning, Will
Is there a possibility that you reach out to Ben and see what time is more convenient for him? I am off next week, and I would like to send the appointment for this mtg, today, and block our calendars. Additionally, I am trying to schedule mtgs for other projects, during that week, and I would like to know my availability before I send appointments. 2-3PM on 4/4/22
1:30-3PM on 4/5/22
10-11AM on 4/7/22
Thanks in advance
Dania
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 8:47 AM
To: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>
Cc: William Wong <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Importance: High
Good morning, Ben
Could you please let me know which one(s) of Will’s proposed dates work for you, so I can send an appointment? I will be out of the office next week, so it will be wonderful if I can schedule the appointment this week and block our calendars. 2-3PM on 4/4/22
1:30-3PM on 4/5/22
10-11AM on 4/7/22
Thanks Ben
Dania
Dania Jimmerson, M.S., P.E.
WRCE, Wastewater Consolidation Program
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114
[email protected]
From: William Wong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 4:36 PM
To: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates EXTERNAL:
Yes it would be good to have Ben in the meeting
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 22, 2022, at 4:34 PM, Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> wrote:
Great! I assume you want Ben to be at the mtg as well. Correct? So… I should wait to see if he is available on those days as well. Correct?
From: William Wong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 4:32 PM
To: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates EXTERNAL:
I can do:
2-3PM on 4/4/22
1:30-3PM on 4/5/22
10-11AM on 4/7/22
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 4:25 PM
To: William Wong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Hello, Will, I understand…Next week I am not available but the following week will be great Please find my availability below and let me know what work best for you and Ben
1. Monday, April 4th anytime from 1300 to 1500
2. Tuesday, April 5th anytime from 1100 to 1530
3. Thursday, April 7th anytime from 0900 to 1530
4. Friday, April 8th anytime from 0900 to 1500
Sincerely,
Dania
From: William Wong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 3:51 PM
To: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates EXTERNAL:
Sorry Dania, I was out of the office from March 11-18th and missed your email.
Is there a time you can meet next week?
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 8:16 AM
To: William Wong <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Koehler <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Good morning, Will
I would like to meet you and discuss the possibility of providing sewer services to Riverview Mobile Home Estates.
1. Monday, March 14th 1pm-5pm
2. Tuesday, March 15th 9am-10am and 1pm-2:30pm
3. Thursday, March 17th 9am-12pm
Please let me know at your earliest convenience what time is better for you and Ben Sincerely,
Dania
Dania Jimmerson, M.S., P.E.
WRCE, Wastewater Consolidation Program
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114
[email protected]
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 5:45 PM
To: William Wong <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Subject: Wastewater Consolidation - Riverview Mobile Home Estates Good afternoon, Will
I am the program coordinator, for the Wastewater Consolidation (WWC) Program within the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Region 5). We met before (November 2020) and discussed the possibility of sewer service provision to Monterey Park Tract CSD. As you may remember, the WWC Program is currently evaluating small, disadvantaged community wastewater systems that could receive grant funding through the Division of Financial Assistance (DFA) to connect to local sewer systems. At the same time, a connecting municipal system such as the City of Modesto WQCF (Facility) may also be eligible for grant funding to upgrade or maintain WQCF permit compliance after connecting these communities.
This time, I am coordinating the WWC effort on behalf of the Riverview Mobile Home Estates (Riverview MHE), which is a severely disadvantaged community, and it is located approximately 10 miles North-East of the City of Modesto Primary WWTP (see figure below). We are looking into the possibility of connecting the Community of Riverview MHE to the City of Modesto WQCF. I would like to have a conversation with you to determine if this might be a viable project, and to provide you with more details about the WWC Program and the funding available. Potentially, there might be funding available for both, Riverview MHE and the City of Modesto WQCF in terms of any necessary treatment upgrades as part of the provision of sewer services to Riverview MHE.
Please contact me to discuss more details about this program and potential wastewater consolidation project. I am available at the following times below:
1. Wednesday, February 9th anytime from 0900 to 1330
2. Thursday, February 10th anytime from 11am-3pm
3. Friday, February 11th anytime from 0900 to 1500
4. Monday, February 14th anytime from 11am-3pm
5. Tuesday, February 15th anytime from 0900 to 1530
Sincerely,
Dania
Dania Jimmerson, M.S., P.E.
WRCE, Wastewater Consolidation Program
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114
[email protected]
From: Aja Verburg
To: Patrick Scott
Subject: Fwd: Riverview/SRWA Water Consolidation Meeting Follow-Up Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 11:41:07 AM
Attachments: image001.png
image205715.png
FYI
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 11:18:09 AM
To: Aja Verburg <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Riverview/SRWA Water Consolidation Meeting Follow-Up Hi Aja,
Bob from the SRWA emailed me this morning with some new information about the SRWA and Riverview Water Purchase Project option outlined in the Feasibility Study. “At a recent SRWA Technical Advisory Committee meeting, the topic of the Riverview MHP came up (as a standing agenda item) and a representative of the Turlock Irrigation District raised a point that I had overlooked and that has to do with any SRWA-produced water being used outside of the TID service area (north of the Tuolumne River). Our Water Services Agreement precludes the SRWA from delivering water outside of the TID service area.
So it seems that Riverview is located outside the TID service area which means a Water Service Agreement cannot be executed to Riverview to utilize the SRWA’s services unless the SRWA Advisory Committee makes an exception. Bob is going to ask the Committee if they need a resolution or more information from us to include Riverview as a customer.
I wanted to share this with you so that you’re aware.
Please review the email chain below for more information and feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Best,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises 8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Robert Granberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 11:01 AM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Riverview/SRWA Water Consolidation Meeting Follow-Up Thania,
You are correct and the resolution would be between SRWA and TID, with your input as well as support from the State Water Board, I believe.
Let me discuss further with TID and get back to you on their official position and what a resolution might be.
Bob
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:51 AM Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Bob,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. If I am understanding correctly, it seems that Riverview is located outside the TID service area which means a Water Service Agreement cannot be executed to Riverview to utilize this service. Is there a process to appeal to the SRWA Advisory Committee to consider Riverview becoming a customer?
Best,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises
8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Robert Granberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 9:41 AM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Riverview/SRWA Water Consolidation Meeting Follow-Up Thania,
At a recent SRWA Technical Advisory Committee meeting, the topic of the Riverview MHP came up (as a standing agenda item) and a representative of the Turlock Irrigation District raised a point that I had overlooked and that has to do with any SRWA-produced water being used outside of the TID service area (north of the Tuolumne River). Our Water Services Agreement precludes the SRWA from delivering water outside of the TID service area.
Not sure if this was discussed in the Feasibility Study, but I thought the issue should be raised now, rather than later. Not to say there can't be a solution, but it is an issue that must be addressed if we go further with this supply concept for the MHP.
Bob
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 9:01 AM Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> wrote:
Good morning Bob,
I will schedule the meeting for March 17th from 10am-11am.
I will send the meeting invite, shortly.
Thank you,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises
8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Robert Granberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 3:43 PM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Riverview/SRWA Water Consolidation Meeting Follow-Up Hi Thania,
I am only available on the 17th from 9-11a, or 3-5p.
Bob
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:58 AM Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> wrote:
Good morning Bob,
Please let me know your availability within the following dates, so I can schedule the SRWA & Riverview MHE Technical Meeting.
March 16th 9am-11am and 3pm-4pm
March 17th 9am-11am and 1pm-5pm
If possible, please share a list of questions for our consultants to answer during the meeting, if you have any pending questions about the project.
Thank you,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises
8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Robert Granberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 11:54 AM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Riverview/SRWA Water Consolidation Meeting Follow-Up Thania,
Thank you for the information. Nice talking to you today! Bob
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:41 AM Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Bob,
Thank you for meeting with me to discuss the Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water Consolidation Project. I have attached the following documents to this email.
1. 2021 Feasibility Study (The SRWA consolidation analysis can be found on page 17 and 21-23)
2. Water Usage Data
3. SRWA & RVMHE Presentation
4. Address: 8200 Jantzen Road Modesto CA 95357 (Riverview Mobile Home Estates Cal Water Watch Data)
I will follow-up with meeting time/date options next week.
Thank you,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises
8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
--
Robert Granberg, P.E., DBIA
Granberg & Associates, Inc.
[email protected]
(209) 401-0439
granbergassociates.com
--
Robert Granberg, P.E., DBIA
Granberg & Associates, Inc.
[email protected]
(209) 401-0439
granbergassociates.com
--
Robert Granberg, P.E., DBIA
Granberg & Associates, Inc.
[email protected]
(209) 401-0439
granbergassociates.com
--
Robert Granberg, P.E., DBIA
Granberg & Associates, Inc.
[email protected]
(209) 401-0439
granbergassociates.com
From: Thania Bejarano
To: Patrick Scott; Aja Verburg
Subject: FW: Riverview MHE - Water-WWC Presentations
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 4:05:35 PM
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
image041197.png
Hello Patrick and Aja,
Below you will find email correspondence between SHE, Regional Board and the City of Waterford confirming that the City of Waterford cannot support Riverview MHE in their water consolidation project.
Let me know if you need more information.
Thank you,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises 8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Michael Pitcock <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 4:01 PM
To: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; Lonnie Statzer <[email protected]>; Stephanie Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Riverview MHE - Water-WWC Presentations
That is correct. We cannot support another water system so far away.
Michael Pitcock, P.E.
City Manager
101 E Street
Waterford, Ca 95386
(209)874-2328 Ext 103
From: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 3:36 PM
To: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>; Lonnie Statzer <[email protected]>; Michael Pitcock <[email protected]>; Stephanie Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Riverview MHE - Water-WWC Presentations
Good afternoon everyone,
It has been some time since we last spoke about the Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water & Sewer Consolidation project.
Back in April, a virtual meeting was held to discuss the city’s potential involvement with the Riverview water and sewer consolidation project. After the meeting, the City of Waterford team was given some time to discuss internally and provide a final response to Self-Help Enterprises and the Regional Board. Based on my notes, there were several concerns about the project like the distance between Waterford and Riverview MHE (3.7 miles), sewer rates ($51.36) and sewer and water flow size. I believe we concluded the City of Waterford is not interested in this project but I wanted to confirm with you. Please let me know if any new information has come to light that has changed the outcome of our last meeting.
I have attached the PowerPoint Presentation to this email for your review.
Please contact me if you need any additional information or have any questions.
Best,
Thania
THANIA BEJARANO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST
Self‑Help Enterprises 8445 W. Elowin Court
P.O. Box 6520
Visalia, CA 93290
559-802-1781 Office
559‑651‑3634 Fax
[email protected]
Http://www.selfhelpenterprises.org
From: Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 2:23 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Thania Bejarano <[email protected]>; Jimmerson, Dania@Waterboards <[email protected]>
Subject: Riverview MHE - Water-WWC Presentations
Lonnie,
Thank you for meeting with us today. Attached are our presentations. We look forward to hearing you
Sincerely,
Dania
Dania Jimmerson, M.S., P.E.
WRCE, Wastewater Consolidation Program
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114
[email protected]
Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
D
Appendix D
July 2021 Water and Billing Data
# Utility Site Resident Name Site Status Last Read This Read Read Diff Bill Amount Billing Units Meter Units 1 Water 118 Lawrence Pena Resident Occupied 91947 95412 3465 $23.94 Gallons CF2 Water 45 Robert O Kelley Resident Occupied 121808 124802 2994 $21.48 Gallons CF3 Water 17 Jesus David Abarca-Radilla Resident Occupied 98996 101717 2721 $20.05 Gallons CF4 Water 192 Juan Miguel Arreola Resident Occupied 99308 102011 2703 $19.95 Gallons CF5 Water 161 Alonzo R. Johnston, Sabria E. JimeneResident Occupied 56340 58886 2546 $19.13 Gallons CF 6 Water 48 Henry, Ermalinda Rodriquez Resident Occupied 39133 41486 2353 $18.12 Gallons CF7 Water 31 James Grider Resident Occupied 34999 37253 2254 $17.60 Gallons CF8 Water 4 Karina Dominguez Resident Occupied 88094 90251 2157 $17.09 Gallons CF9 Water 29 Walter Tyler Resident Occupied 11233 13351 2118 $16.89 Gallons CF10 Water 39 Gybran Valdivia Resident Occupied 135395 137396 2001 $16.28 Gallons CF11 Water 183 Robert and Susan, Labit Resident Occupied 42972 44914 1942 $15.97 Gallons CF12 Water 169 Lilia ana Solorzano Resident Occupied 8442 10374 1932 $15.92 Gallons CF13 Water 222 David W. Walker Resident Occupied 38668 40579 1911 $15.81 Gallons CF14 Water 175 Antonio Olvera Resident Occupied 81450 83248 1798 $15.21 Gallons CF15 Water 227 Jose Canela Resident Occupied 60053 61850 1797 $15.21 Gallons CF16 Water 181 Cindy Rivas, Marisol Rivas Resident Occupied 126015 127800 1785 $15.15 Gallons CF17 Water 120 Shannon Amos Jared, Joan Parker Resident Occupied 26022 27786 1764 $15.04 Gallons CF18 Water 19 Florentino Martinez Resident Occupied 159699 161366 1667 $14.53 Gallons CF19 Water 130 Vianey Ortiz Marcos Garcia Resident Occupied 61715 63360 1645 $14.41 Gallons CF20 Water 226 Carrie Grimes Resident Occupied 40052 41697 1645 $14.41 Gallons CF21 Water 198 Laureano Madrigal Resident Occupied 24461 26103 1642 $14.40 Gallons CF22 Water 117 Jose Vasquez Resident Occupied 115318 116951 1633 $14.35 Gallons CF23 Water 3 Fernando Alcantara Resident Occupied 102667 104219 1552 $13.93 Gallons CF24 Water 166 Efrain Rosales Rodrigues Resident Occupied 98609 100140 1531 $13.82 Gallons CF25 Water 46 Javier Maldonado Resident Occupied 59233 60613 1380 $13.03 Gallons CF26 Water 190 Pantaleon Real Resident Occupied 133598 134973 1375 $13.00 Gallons CF27 Water 12 Zoilo Angeles Resident Occupied 68105 69477 1372 $12.98 Gallons CF28 Water 147 Oscar Espinoza Resident Occupied 58061 59429 1368 $12.96 Gallons CF29 Water 223 Renee Warnock Resident Occupied 99241 100609 1368 $12.96 Gallons CF30 Water 221 Jorge Chavez, Rosa Soltero Resident Occupied 47321 48586 1265 $12.42 Gallons CF31 Water 105 Susan Molloy Resident Occupied 43084 44301 1217 $12.17 Gallons CF32 Water 179 Ramiro Sandoval Resident Occupied 114831 116041 1210 $12.14 Gallons CF33 Water 172 Oscar, Agueda Chavez Community Owned - R 63769 64967 1198 $12.07 Gallons CF34 Water 21 Martin G., Elmira Solis Resident Occupied 50575 51756 1181 $11.98 Gallons CF35 Water 40 Abel Lugo, Ana Larios Resident Occupied 26792 27951 1159 $11.87 Gallons CF36 Water 159 Maria J. Monroy Jose G. Miranda Resident Occupied 45129 46266 1137 $11.75 Gallons CF37 Water 42 Savone Saruen, Rommel Munoz Resident Occupied 31393 32522 1129 $11.71 Gallons CF38 Water 168 Rosendo and Marisol Vargas Resident Occupied 82993 84122 1129 $11.71 Gallons CF Billing - High/Low ReportRiverview Mobile Estates
# Utility Site Resident Name Site Status Last Read This Read Read Diff Bill Amount Billing Units Meter Units 39 Water 102 Efren Martinez Rodriguez Resident Occupied 73602 74713 1111 $11.62 Gallons CF40 Water 9 Rico Juan Manuel and Marisol Resident Occupied 50865 51973 1108 $11.60 Gallons CF41 Water 146 Van Tham Vu Resident Occupied 52275 53337 1062 $11.36 Gallons CF42 Water 189 Darren Harris Resident Occupied 31712 32768 1056 $11.33 Gallons CF43 Water 203 Doyle David Jr. Snow Resident Occupied 48415 49466 1051 $11.30 Gallons CF44 Water 217 Amparo Sandoval Resident Occupied 129901 130921 1020 $11.14 Gallons CF45 Water 111 Norma E. Melendez Resident Occupied 26800 27816 1016 $11.12 Gallons CF46 Water 232 Jose Tagle Resident Occupied 75170 76181 1011 $11.09 Gallons CF47 Water 236 Joseph and Vincent Porter Resident Occupied 51923 52932 1009 $11.08 Gallons CF48 Water 36 Raymond Perea Resident Occupied 86649 87612 963 $10.84 Gallons CF49 Water 149 Ana Zavalza Resident Occupied 71883 72844 961 $10.83 Gallons CF50 Water 49 Ernest and Deborah Henderson Resident Occupied 31542 32499 957 $10.81 Gallons CF51 Water 182 Reyes Valerio Bautista Resident Occupied 22249 23200 951 $10.78 Gallons CF52 Water 219 Jose L. Venegas Melissa Creps Resident Occupied 43191 44138 947 $10.76 Gallons CF53 Water 156 Elida Retana Resident Occupied 31336 32271 935 $10.70 Gallons CF54 Water 108 Alan Yates Resident Occupied 89527 90445 918 $10.61 Gallons CF55 Water 104 Raul Larios Resident Occupied 110408 111325 917 $10.60 Gallons CF56 Water 176 Ralph and Patricia Arbizu Resident Occupied 44733 45643 910 $10.56 Gallons CF57 Water 218 Victor Mezquita Resident Occupied 64731 65633 902 $10.52 Gallons CF58 Water 116 Rosaura Vallejo Resident Occupied 50874 51761 887 $10.44 Gallons CF59 Water 112 Felicia Martinez Resident Occupied 42501 43355 854 $10.27 Gallons CF60 Water 25 Martin Moreno, Estela Moreno Resident Occupied 1614 2432 818 $10.08 Gallons CF61 Water 230 Janet Dominguez Resident Occupied 71135 71950 815 $10.07 Gallons CF62 Water 194 Jack Kessler Resident Occupied 217454 218268 814 $10.06 Gallons CF63 Water 20 Bertha Hernandez Resident Occupied 31251 32049 798 $9.98 Gallons CF64 Water 126 Valerie Cook Resident Occupied 37808 38604 796 $9.97 Gallons CF65 Water 191 Pedro Munoz Resident Occupied 191114 191896 782 $9.89 Gallons CF66 Water 234 Barbara Bowers Resident Occupied 102388 103170 782 $9.89 Gallons CF67 Water 47 Juan Lopez, Guadalupe Garcia-LopezResident Occupied 24336 25103 767 $9.82 Gallons CF 68 Water 155 Albert and Carol Meere Resident Occupied 49119 49884 765 $9.81 Gallons CF69 Water 128 Jose M, Concepcion D. Aguinaga Resident Occupied 30019 30778 759 $9.77 Gallons CF70 Water 33 Jodie M./Charlotte A. Ferguson/ Gail Resident Occupied 55261 56009 748 $9.72 Gallons CF71 Water 171 Arturo Marquez Resident Occupied 75974 76720 746 $9.71 Gallons CF72 Water 220 Tomas Illescas Resident Occupied 37316 38052 736 $9.65 Gallons CF73 Water 239 Coleen McDonough Resident Occupied 32265 32986 721 $9.58 Gallons CF74 Water 127 Concepcion Soriano, Christine MahiyaResident Occupied 30530 31249 719 $9.56 Gallons CF75 Water 188 Larry Allen Beals Resident Occupied 35380 36091 711 $9.52 Gallons CF76 Water 110 Francisco, Margarita, David Luna Resident Occupied 34870 35577 707 $9.50 Gallons CF77 Water 202 Oscar O. Martinez, Ciara M. Carder Resident Occupied 32891 33577 686 $9.39 Gallons CF78 Water 106 Frank, Leona Oliveira Resident Occupied 55629 56310 681 $9.37 Gallons CF # Utility Site Resident Name Site Status Last Read This Read Read Diff Bill Amount Billing Units Meter Units 79 Water 240 Caree and Anthony Rochelle, Helen
HResident Occupied 58526 59196 670 $9.31 Gallons CF
80 Water 228 Charlotte Ann Geil Resident Occupied 42194 42860 666 $9.29 Gallons CF81 Water 151 Gumercindo Garcia Resident Occupied 38168 38832 664 $9.28 Gallons CF82 Water 13 Juan Lopez, Jonataly Martinez Resident Occupied 38703 39360 657 $9.24 Gallons CF83 Water 50 Mervin and Gloria, Gray Resident Occupied 15301 15946 645 $9.18 Gallons CF84 Water 154 Ricardo Rodriguez Resident Occupied 35308 35952 644 $9.17 Gallons CF85 Water 180 Stacie L. Fjellstrom Resident Occupied 78852 79494 642 $9.16 Gallons CF86 Water 187 Theresa Griffen Smith Resident Occupied 40161 40785 624 $9.07 Gallons CF87 Water 103 Jose Arevalo, Elisa Gonzalez Resident Occupied 24811 25427 616 $9.03 Gallons CF88 Water 157 Marianne Pietrzyk, Brooke Pietrzyk Resident Occupied 40797 41385 588 $8.88 Gallons CF89 Water 30 Rebecca Sullivan Resident Occupied 9839 10422 583 $8.85 Gallons CF90 Water 44 Douglas, Amanda Gilbert Resident Occupied 15613 16180 567 $8.77 Gallons CF91 Water 119 Jose Jimenez, Maria De Jesus Rivas Resident Occupied 63358 63913 555 $8.71 Gallons CF92 Water 26 Cesar, Oralia Gomez Resident Occupied 47750 48299 549 $8.67 Gallons CF93 Water 38 Robert J. Roach Resident Occupied 21872 22414 542 $8.64 Gallons CF94 Water 34 Braden Neal Rambo Resident Occupied 13324 13863 539 $8.62 Gallons CF95 Water 113 Rogelio Fuentes, Alberto T. Reynaga Resident Occupied 21888 22408 520 $8.52 Gallons CF96 Water 173 Jean Mesa Resident Occupied 34496 35009 513 $8.49 Gallons CF97 Water 186 Chris and Amber Jepsen Resident Occupied 110579 111083 504 $8.44 Gallons CF98 Water 143 Megan A. Vance Resident Occupied 8811 9305 494 $8.39 Gallons CF99 Water 185 Alan Lucas Resident Occupied 56410 56895 485 $8.34 Gallons CF100 Water 152 Gabriel, Licet Pelayo Resident Occupied 1978 2457 479 $8.31 Gallons CF101 Water 225 Olen Wise Resident Occupied 53361 53836 475 $8.29 Gallons CF102 Water 195 Robert Castillo Resident Occupied 32596 33068 472 $8.27 Gallons CF103 Water 170 Romello D. Parker Resident Occupied 44938 45405 467 $8.25 Gallons CF104 Water 150 Ana E. Lizarraga Resident Occupied 42720 43176 456 $8.19 Gallons CF105 Water 23 Michelle Quintong Resident Occupied 101441 101893 452 $8.17 Gallons CF106 Water 199 Daryl D. Rebero Resident Occupied 22823 23275 452 $8.17 Gallons CF107 Water 167 Jose Pastrana Resident Occupied 69385 69836 451 $8.16 Gallons CF108 Water 11 Jesus Oregel-Montanez Resident Occupied 21824 22274 450 $8.16 Gallons CF109 Water 196 Abel Silva Jr., Aidee J. Silva Resident Occupied 43574 44022 448 $8.15 Gallons CF110 Water 158 Ismael Iniguez Resident Occupied 3889 4326 437 $8.09 Gallons CF111 Water 229 Martin Mendoza Resident Occupied 44442 44865 423 $8.01 Gallons CF112 Water 123 Hector L.,Celeste L. Gutierrez RodriguResident Occupied 28813 29231 418 $7.99 Gallons CF113 Water 107 Andre, Sonya and Andre Jr., Morton Resident Occupied 13512 13927 415 $7.97 Gallons CF114 Water 200B Alyccia Vigil Resident Occupied 42902 43315 413 $7.96 Gallons CF115 Water 35 Jimmie Frazel Resident Occupied 88590 89001 411 $7.95 Gallons CF116 Water 160 Emily M. Cummins Resident Occupied 37150 37557 407 $7.93 Gallons CF117 Water 197 Sandra Pierson, Bruce Boyd Resident Occupied 9610 10009 399 $7.89 Gallons CF118 Water 98 Jarel and Joan Parker Resident Occupied 13786 14169 383 $7.81 Gallons CF # Utility Site Resident Name Site Status Last Read This Read Read Diff Bill Amount Billing Units Meter Units 119 Water 148 Jaime and Margarita Rodriguez Resident Occupied 20094 20475 381 $7.79 Gallons CF120 Water 174 Enrique A. Olvera Resident Occupied 75214 75579 365 $7.71 Gallons CF121 Water 224 Twila I Chaffee Resident Occupied 30703 31067 364 $7.71 Gallons CF122 Water 51 Arlene Harnden Resident Occupied 19457 19818 361 $7.69 Gallons CF123 Water 200A Luisa A. Cortez, Guadalupe J. GarzonResident Occupied 22118 22477 359 $7.68 Gallons CF 124 Water 32 Lydia Evans Resident Occupied 9258 9607 349 $7.63 Gallons CF125 Water 94 Michael G., Charlotte A. Lyman Resident Occupied 23230 23571 341 $7.59 Gallons CF126 Water 6 Monica L. Booker Resident Occupied 14964 15302 338 $7.57 Gallons CF127 Water 177 Kimberly Quillen Resident Occupied 10037 10351 314 $7.44 Gallons CF128 Water 95 James S. Umstetter, Dawn E. UmstettResident Occupied 21002 21313 311 $7.43 Gallons CF129 Water 28 Lea Anne Lamarre Smith Resident Occupied 17568 17866 298 $7.36 Gallons CF130 Water 37 Karen Kent Resident Occupied 53155 53444 289 $7.31 Gallons CF131 Water 237 Leslie/Frances Vaughn/Eckoldt Resident Occupied 34698 34986 288 $7.31 Gallons CF132 Water 178 Doris N. Thompson Resident Occupied 31160 31428 268 $7.20 Gallons CF133 Water 99 Bonnie Haarstad Resident Occupied 29465 29722 257 $7.15 Gallons CF134 Water 145 Robert Rodriguez Resident Occupied 36301 36554 253 $7.12 Gallons CF135 Water 235 Medina Holguin Abel Resident Occupied 23612 23863 251 $7.11 Gallons CF136 Water 10 Karen Olsen Resident Occupied 56541 56780 239 $7.05 Gallons CF137 Water 27 Matthew J. Koval Resident Occupied 19258 19488 230 $7.00 Gallons CF138 Water 121 Sharisse L. Atkins Resident Occupied 21867 22088 221 $6.96 Gallons CF139 Water 125 Donna Peterson Resident Occupied 8952 9163 211 $6.90 Gallons CF140 Water 16 Magali E. Eligio, Jesse Alejandre Resident Occupied 17507 17711 204 $6.87 Gallons CF141 Water 5 Eloy Valenzuela Resident Occupied 7314 7515 201 $6.85 Gallons CF142 Water 15 Patricia Stephens Resident Occupied 8955 9153 198 $6.84 Gallons CF143 Water 7 Aron/Carrie Hunstable/Grimes Resident Occupied 17756 17944 188 $6.78 Gallons CF144 Water 201 Steven Nall Resident Occupied 34388 34568 180 $6.74 Gallons CF145 Water 204 John Adams Resident Occupied 19389 19560 171 $6.70 Gallons CF146 Water 193 Gayla Sandoval Resident Occupied 28907 29077 170 $6.69 Gallons CF147 Water 144 Jasmine M. Ledesma Huerta Resident Occupied 8519 8685 166 $6.67 Gallons CF148 Water 231 Susan Williams Resident Occupied 15104 15259 155 $6.61 Gallons CF149 Water 153 Carmelo Ramirez Resident Occupied 12886 13037 151 $6.59 Gallons CF150 Water 233 Connie L. Rotering Resident Occupied 9648 9782 134 $6.50 Gallons CF151 Water 97 Eunice Stevenson, Denis A. StevensoResident Occupied 14497 14598 101 $6.33 Gallons CF152 Water 164 Nathan Conley Resident Occupied 56717 56812 95 $6.30 Gallons CF153 Water 165 Michael, Mary Eaton Resident Occupied 42651 42744 93 $6.29 Gallons CF154 Water 115 Eduardo Cabrera Resident Occupied 6760 6834 74 $6.19 Gallons CF155 Water 238 John Boehm Resident Occupied 10327 10397 70 $6.17 Gallons CF156 Water 184 David Harrah Resident Occupied 78986 79018 32 $5.97 Gallons CF157 Water 41 Joyce Wilson Resident Occupied 15105 15107 2 $5.81 Gallons CF158 Water 18 Juan Mendoza Resident Occupied 19492 19492 0 $5.80 Gallons CF # Utility Site Resident Name Site Status Last Read This Read Read Diff Bill Amount Billing Units Meter Units 159 Water 43 Frances A./Steve A. Hassapakis Resident Occupied 6334 6334 0 $5.80 Gallons CF160 Water 96 Susan Nava Resident Occupied 20354 20354 0 $5.80 Gallons CF161 Water 162 David Guadalupe Partida Resident Occupied 839 839 0 $5.80 Gallons CF162 Water 114 Juan M. Ramos Resident Occupied 39276 40351 1075 $6.55 Gallons Gallons163 Water 101 Sue Kane Resident Occupied 87026 87694 668 $6.27 Gallons Gallons164 Water 129 Jose Martinez Resident Occupied 56979 57578 599 $6.22 Gallons Gallons165 Water 8 Maria Luisa Vaca, Erik Vaca Resident Occupied 31418 31832 414 $6.09 Gallons Gallons166 Water 109 Nancy Petersen, Jeniffer A. Perry Resident Occupied 68682 69095 413 $6.09 Gallons Gallons167 Water 124 Amanda Parker Amy Martin Resident Occupied 11141 11549 408 $6.09 Gallons Gallons168 Water 22 Eric Richardson, Jeanette Vierra Resident Occupied 16648 17027 379 $6.07 Gallons Gallons169 Water 24 Rashida Turner Resident Occupied 16762 17082 320 $6.02 Gallons Gallons170 Water 122 Cristian and Mariana, Rivas Resident Occupied 34883 35202 319 $6.02 Gallons Gallons TOTAL BILL AMOUNT FOR JULY 2021: $1,676.14
TOTAL MONTHLY WATER USAGE (RESIDENTIAL): 985,889 Gallons TOTAL MONTHLY WATER USAGE (COMMON AREA): 854,709 Gallons AVERAGE MONTHLY WATER USAGE PER CUSTOMER: 5,799 Gallons Riverview Mobile Home Estates Water System
Affordability Study
January 2023
E
Appendix E
Self-Help Enterprises RMHE Survey and DFA Approval
Median Household Income Survey
RIVERVIEW
MOBILE
ESTATES
___
March 2020 - July 2020
Presented by Self-Help Enterprises
Funded by the State Water Resource Control Board
Stanislaus County Department
ID Number: 349053058053
A Nonprofit Housing and Community Development Organization Riverview Mobile Estates MHI Final Report Page 1
Income Survey Final Report
Prepared by Self-Help Enterprises for Riverview Mobile Estates - Introduction -
Riverview Mobile Estates (RV), is located near Jantzen Road and Geer Road in Stanislaus County northeast of Hughson. This community water system (CWS) currently provides water service to 169 dwellings. The information from this survey will assist the water system in obtaining funding from various federal or state funding programs. The funding will be used to conduct a feasibility study and cover the design of water system improvements to address the water system’s uranium contamination. The potential improvements consist of rehabilitation of existing sources, and/or consolidation with surrounding large water systems.
- Purpose -
Riverview Mobile Estates is located within Block Group 3, Census Tract 28.02 in Stanislaus County. The District accounts for a very small portion of the Block Group. According to the 2014-2018 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimate, Block Group 3, Census Tract 28.02, has a Median Household Income (MHI) of $58,452 with a margin of error of ±$24,564. Upon inspection of the District’s boundaries, it was suspected that the reported MHI of this District was uncharacteristic of the Block Group’s actual MHI. To more accurately determine the District’s MHI, a Median Household Income Survey was deemed necessary.
- Methodology -
The survey was conducted from March 1, 2020 to July 20, 2020. Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) conducted the survey in accordance with the June 2014 State and Federal multi-agency guidelines established for the California Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control Board, and US Department of Agriculture. SHE mailed surveys and conducted over-the-phone survey submissions. Per agency survey requirements, a letter was distributed to the residents of the community from the Stanislaus County Public Works Department on March 23, 2020. This correspondence was followed by the first survey letters and forms from SHE on April 1st, 2020. On April 15, 2020 a second mailing of the survey letters and forms Riverview Mobile Estates MHI Final Report Page 2
were sent to the residents that had not completed their surveys. Due to Governor Gavin Newsom stay-athome executive order, door-to-door outreach was not carried out to protect the health and well-being of Riverview residents and SHE staff. Phone calls were conducted between June 2020 - July 10, 2020 (over 120 residents). Every resident was contacted at least twice in a span of two months. By the conclusion of the survey four residents opted out of the survey. The survey was concluded on July 20, 2020 after reaching out to residents twice by mailers and twice by phone, and providing sufficient time to respond.
The guidelines require a minimum response rate of 69% for a community of this size. Once concluded, the survey data was collected and analyzed in the attached Tally of Survey Results (Exhibit E). - Results -
The following count of community’s households has been developed based on information provided by the Riverview Mobile Estates Owners and Property Owners County Public Works Department and SHE’s acquired knowledge of residential dwellings in the District:
Occupied Dwellings 169
Vacation Homes 0
Vacant Homes 0
Total Dwellings 169
Average Occupants per
Household
3 Riverview Mobile Estates has 169 occupied dwellings, and require 117 responses to meet the minimum 69% response rate. After two rounds of survey mailers and two rounds of phone surveys, 106 responses were received. The State Water Resources Control Board approved defaulting eleven surveys to the highest income value of $150,000 (Exhibit E). Based on survey results, the annual Median Household Income for the community of Riverview Mobile Estates is $35,000.