CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
Consolidated Plan
2025-2029
OUTREACH REPORT
Community Engagement Mee�ng
Phase 1 : November 12, 2024 and November 13, 2024
Phase 2: January 14, 2025 and January 16, 2025
PHASE 1: COMMUNITY MEETING OVERVIEW
On Tuesday, November 12, 2024, at 6 PM, residents and community members were invited to attend a public meeting conducted in Spanish at Huntington Park City Hall, located at 6550 Miles Ave, Huntington Park, CA 90255. A total of 13 attendees signed in and actively participated.
The following day, Wednesday, November 13, 2024, at 10 AM, another session was held in English at Freedom Park, located at 3801 E 61st St, Huntington Park, CA 90255. This session was attended by 10 participants who signed in and engaged in the discussions.
The City posted an announcement for the meetings on their social media and sent email invitations to residents who participated in the City’s affordable housing, Home Repair, Emergency Rental Assistance, and social services programs.
Both meetings began with a presentation providing an overview of the 5-year analysis of impediments and the 5-year consolidated plan. Following the presentation, participants were invited to contribute their live feedback by writing their responses on Post-it notes, which they then placed on question boards set up around the room. At the end of each session, attendees were encouraged to complete the community needs survey. The result for this survey will be summarized in the community needs survey section.
THEMES
Through the feedback gathered from the participants, the following themes emerged:
Housing
There is a need to create more affordable housing, help renters become homeowners, and rehabilitate old houses.
Public Services
Participants highlighted the need for services related to Homeless, Fair Housing, After School, and Senior Services. However, they would like to see improved communication about available services.
Community Facilities
Participants highlighted the need for better broadband, repairs to parks and streets, safer crosswalks, and transportation safety.
Economic Development
Participants emphasized supporting small businesses and creating local job opportunities.
LIVE FEEDBACK SESSION
After the presentation, the meeting was opened to receive feedback from participants in four categories: housing, public services, community facilities, and economic development. The questions were asked in English and Spanish. Below is a summary of their responses.
Housing- Do you think the City’s current approach to affordable housing is meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Home Repair Program
• Affordable Housing Projects
Summary:
• 4 participants agree that the current affordable housing approach is meeting the community’s needs
• 1 responded no because many people are unaware of these meeting and have different needs in their lives
• Need to increase housing stocks
• Need to help renters buy homes
• Need to rehabilitate old housing stock
• The Home Repair program is a good program to the much needed Public Services: Do you believe these programs or services are meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Inner City Visions
• Fair Housing Foundation
• Parks and Recreation After School Program
• Parks and Recreation Senior Program
Summary:
• Nine participants expressed that the current programs and services are meeting the community's needs. One stated that revitalizing businesses on Pacific Blvd could help attract better business. Another noted the need for a physical resource center where individuals can learn about and access domestic violence and homeless services, highlighting that Huntington Park struggles with outreach and information dissemination and calling for more creative engagement strategies.
• A participant mentioned that while Inner City Visions serves a small group of individuals (361 people), many more in the community would benefit from the program, and drop-in services are needed on a case-by-case basis. Another participant affirmed that the
services offered, such as the program at Salt Lake Park, are meeting the needs of vulnerable individuals.
• There was also a suggestion to expand the Fair Housing Service to include tenantlandlord arbitration. While most participants agreed that the services are meeting their needs, some felt that better outreach is necessary to ensure residents are aware of the available services.
• A question was raised about the presence of a homeless shelter in the City, and staff responded that the City partners with an agency that can refer individuals to shelter on a case-by-case basis, though the person must agree to be housed.
Community Facilities: Do you believe any other infrastructure improvements are needed to enhance our community?
Projects:
• Wi-Fi Facility Construction
• Chesley Park ADA improvements
• CDBG ADA Street reconstruction project
Summary:
• Five attendees highlighted additional infrastructure improvements needed to enhance the community. One participant emphasized the need to increase broadband infrastructure, while another mentioned the necessity of repairs to existing parks and streets.
• Several attendees noted that the City has become cleaner, with one individual sharing that their street was being repaved, including parts of California Avenue, with improvements from businesses like Starbucks.
• Participants also pointed out the need for safer crosswalks, with suggestions to repaint lines and improve lighting to ensure cars stop and yield the right of way, addressing pedestrian-vehicle collisions caused by failure to yield. • A participant was concerned about regulation of the flow of movement in the City, as multiple forms of transportation (pedestrians, runners, bikers, e-scooters, etc.) share the sidewalks and roads. It was stressed that bikes and e-scooters should not be on the sidewalk, which poses safety risk to pedestrians. Protected bike lanes, specifically on busy streets like Florence, Gage, Slauson, and Pacific, to prevent accidents and improve public safety.
Economic Development: Do you believe these economic development programs are meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Hub Cities Job Creation
• Façade Improvement program
Summary:
• 5 attendees expressed that the City's programs are meeting the community's needs.
However, several participants emphasized the importance of job creation and supporting small businesses.
• Participants emphasized the need for more diverse businesses to be brought into the City, with a focus on further developing Pacific Blvd to enhance its appeal. They stressed the importance of being selective about the types of businesses introduced, advocating for support of local businesses (e.g., coffee shops) over larger chains like Starbucks.
Rather than more large-chain stores like Target or Home Depot, they advocated for revitalizing and supporting local businesses, such as those offering lumber and art supplies, and providing incentives for small business owners over corporations receiving tax cuts.
• It was also noted that incentivizing businesses within the City could help create jobs, as many individuals return to Huntington Park after completing their education but face challenges in finding local employment opportunities.
• Suggestions for improvement included expanding the funding for the Façade Improvement Program and increasing staffing at Hub Cities. There was a call to enhance small business development programs and support the establishment of a regional small business development center.
Other: Do you have other feedback?
Summary:
• One participant expressed appreciation for the meeting and hoped to be invited to future events that are important for the community.
• Another participant provided feedback regarding the management of the Huntington Park Instagram account. They noted that there is significant potential to better engage the community through social media, but currently, the posts are not effectively reaching the audience. The participant stressed the importance of community engagement and requested that the City take social media communication more seriously, as residents rely on it for important information.
EVENT FLYERS
PHOTOS
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, at 6 PM
Huntington Park City Hall, located at 6550 Miles Ave, Huntington Park, CA 90255 Wednesday, November 13, 2024, at 10 AM
Freedom Park, located at 3801 E 61st St, Huntington Park, CA 90255
PARTICIPANTS FEEDBACK
PHASE 2: COMMUNITY MEETING OVERVIEW
On Monday, January 14, 2025, at 6 PM, residents and community members were invited to attend a public meeting conducted in Spanish at Huntington Park City Hall, located at 6550 Miles Ave, Huntington Park, CA 90255. A total of 8 attendees signed in and actively participated in the meeting.
On Thursday, January 16, 2025, at 6 PM, residents and community members were invited to attend a public meeting conducted in English at Huntington Park City Hall, located at 6550 Miles Ave, Huntington Park, CA 90255. A total of 14 attendees signed in and actively participated in the meeting.
The City posted an announcement for the meetings on their social media and sent email invitations to residents who participated in the City’s affordable housing, Home Repair, Emergency Rental Assistance, and social services programs.
This meeting summarizes the target goals and preliminary findings from the survey, community meetings, and stakeholder focus groups to be set up in the Draft Consolidated Plan. Two meetings were held in English and Spanish. These meetings were designed to gather feedback from residents on the goals and strategies that will address housing and supportive service needs.
THEMES
Through the feedback gathered from the participants, the following themes emerged:
Housing
There is a need to create more affordable housing and housing rehabilitation Public Services
Participants highlighted the importance to address homelessness and for the City to continue its partnership with local organizations like Inner City Visions.
Community Facilities
Participants highlighted the need for walkway improvement, park repairs, street repairs, and ADA compliance improvements.
Economic Development
Participants emphasized supporting small businesses through programs like the Façade Improvement
LIVE FEEDBACK SESSION - January 14, 2025
1. Resident: How is the City helping homeless individuals • The City partners with ICV to help homeless individuals
2. Resident: From the survey that has been sent out to residents, how were they sent? • Farmers Market, Social Media pages, City Website, Communications Bulletin.
3. Resident: What does the City mean when they say they help homeowners/residents?
• The City provide resources and programs like Home Repair Program, Owner Occupied Rehabilitation, and First Time Home Buyer
4. Resident: “I appreciate the city providing these resources because a lot of houses in Huntington Park are deteriorating
LIVE FEEDBACK SESSION - January 16, 2025
1. Resident: Are contractors selected within the City?
• Contractors are public contractors with the respective license needed to do the necessary tasks.
2. Resident: Do these projects (Façade Improvement) going to be Request for Proposals (RFPs)?
• These are going to follow the bidding process, however they don’t go to City Council
3. Resident: Is there any way we can support local business that are already here? • Is the City going to inform the local businesses regarding the grants that are available to improve their business?
• Currently the grant is still under development, but the businesses must do their own due diligence alongside staff marketing
4. Resident: Does Façade improvement consist of following the historical architecture?
5. Resident: How does one voice their opinion/concerns to let the City know that a certain building is not ADA compliant?
• City Council
6. Resident: Are there any plans to do construction at Salt lake park- because there are no walk paths.
• You need to attend City council meetings to voice your concerns
7. Resident: How transparent are meetings?
8. Resident: What if people change their minds about the allocation of funds after the ConPlan is adopted?
• If there is a concern after the adoption of the Con Plan that will be taken to City Council
9. Resident: “I was disappointed with the number of responses to the ConPlan survey”- Is there any way we can do physical outreach to do surveys? Door-to-door, community meetings, etc.?
• Currently we did outreach at the Farmers Market, schools and social media, but out current bandwidth doesn’t allow for door-to-door assistance.
10. Resident: How does the City quantify homelessness?
• The City participates in the LAHSA homeless count yearly
EVENT FLYERS
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
Consolidated Plan
2025-2029
OUTREACH RESULT
Stakeholder Group
September 17, 2024, September 18, 2024, and November 20, 2024
PLANNING COMMISSION OVERVIEW
On Wednesday, September 18, 2024, a presentation discussion for the Con Plan was held before the Planning Commission Meeting to gather feedback on the priority needs of the City.
The presentation began by providing an overview of the 5-year analysis of impediments and the 5-year consolidated plan. Following the presentation, participants were invited to contribute their live feedback in four categories: housing, public services, community facilities, and economic development. The feedback provided are summarized below:
THEMES
Housing
Ideas include converting motels into long-term housing, expanding affordable housing, homeownership education, and rezoning for more affordable housing.
Public Services
Ideas include improved outreach about available City programs, supporting afterschool program, and the senior program
Community Facilities
Ideas include ensuring that all parks are America with Disability Act compliant and improving pavements on streets.
Economic Development
Ideas include façade improvement to businesses on Pacific, improving public safety with cameras and better lighting
LIVE FEEDBACK SESSION
Housing: Do you think the City’s current approach to affordable housing is meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Home Repair Program
• Affordable Housing Projects
Feedback:
• John Estrada:
o Identify a way to establish more affordable housing
• Graciela Ortiz:
o Amada Project is a good example of what the City needs. o Educate children about becoming a homeowner and how to attain that goal
o Drill down and identify ways to address affordable housing o Making more condos, townhomes, and apartments being more readily available for affordable housing.
o Think outside the box, possibly look at the number of motels the City has and turning those into affordable housing, a more long-term approach project similar to “Project Room Key”.
• Eduardo Carvajai:
o Rezoning commercial areas for example West of Slauson and making pockets opportunity zones for affordable housing.
o Slauson St has a lot of opportunities for mixed use development, I would like to see that as a goal.
Public Services: Do you believe these programs or services are meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Inner City Visions
• Fair Housing Foundation
• Parks and Recreation After School Program
• Parks and Recreation Senior Program
Feedback:
• John Estrada:
o I feel getting the word out to more of the community regarding the programs the City is offering is key. Although the City may advertise, taking a more aggressive approach to communication. My parents and I are residents and we are not aware the City had these programs.
• Graciela Ortiz:
o Tutoring for children is a more 1 on 1 approach using CDBG funding or other sources and work through Parks & Rec. Many face-to-face activities with children take place at City run programs facilities; utilize that time to foster educating and offering educational activities.
• Eduardo Carvajai:
o I like the approach of field trips for seniors.
Community Facilities: Do you believe any other infrastructure improvements are needed to enhance our community?
Projects:
• Wi-Fi Facility Construction
• Chesley Park ADA improvements
• CDBG ADA Street reconstruction project
Feedback:
• John Estrada:
o Community WIFI is a great tool for the community.
o Ensure all parks are ADA compliant.
• Graciela Ortiz:
o Only discussion, no specific comment.
• John Estrada:
o Pavement rehabilitation on specific streets, such as on State St from Randolph to Slauson.
Economic Development: Do you believe these economic development programs are meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Hub Cities Job Creation
• Façade Improvement program
Feedback:
• John Estrada:
o Only discussion, no specific comment
• Graciela Ortiz:
o More focus on façade improvements along Pacific as an example o Public safety is key, if possible, install cameras on Pacific. • Eduardo Carajai:
o More lighting on Pacific would increase safety and business opportunities to business owners to allow stores to remain open longer.
o Lighting, even stringing lighting across Pacific was once done in past years. o Adopt language that speaks to façade improvements, such as, Pasadena. Have a storefront theme, a color scheme, and a canopy type for a more homogenized look among all businesses.
HEALTH AND EDUCATION OVERVIEW
On Tuesday, September 17, 2024, a presentation discussion for the Con Plan was held before the Health and Education Commission Meeting to gather feedback on the priority needs of the City. The presentation began by providing an overview of the 5-year analysis of impediments and the 5-year consolidated plan. Following the presentation, participants were invited to contribute their live feedback in four categories: housing, public services, community facilities, and economic development. The feedback provided are summarized below:
THEMES
Housing
Ideas include increased outreach efforts to help residents’ housing application.
Public Services
Ideas include increased outreach by targeted advertising and collaboration with schools.
Community Facilities
Ideas include improved pedestrian safety.
Economic Development
Ideas include employment support for young adults.
LIVE FEEDBACK SESSION
Housing: Do you think the City’s current approach to affordable housing is meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Home Repair Program
• Affordable Housing Projects
Feedback:
• Liselda Fabian: No response
• Ebony Batiste: No response
• Illiana Baltazar:
o If we are meeting our goal of 21, we have met our goal. • Iris Delgado:
o Have the application and understanding of process more favorable to residents. o Have a focus group verses 1 on 1 which will allow residents more likely to apply.
Public Services: Do you believe these programs or services are meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Inner City Visions
• Fair Housing Foundation
• Parks and Recreation After School Program
• Parks and Recreation Senior Program
Feedback:
• Liselda Fabian: No response
• Ebony Batiste: No response
• Illiana Baltazar:
o Residents having the ability to refer to ICV
o Advertising to be geared more toward the middle aged who may not be so tech savvy.
o Schools can communicate City programs during school events. • Iris Delgado:
o Looking at bringing in programs not run by the City, ran by other organizations who want to bring additional opportunity
Community Facilities: Do you believe any other infrastructure improvements are needed to enhance our community?
Projects:
• Wi-Fi Facility Construction
• Chesley Park ADA improvements
• CDBG ADA Street reconstruction project
Feedback:
• Liselda Fabian: No response
• Ebony Batiste: No response
• Illiana Tazar: No response
• Iris Delgado:
o Salt Lake Park is busy, suggested the cross walk at Bissell and Florence be upgraded with a light to allow pedestrians to cross while vehicles stop.
Economic Development: Do you believe these economic development programs are meeting the community’s needs?
Projects:
• Hub Cities Job Creation
• Façade Improvement program
Feedback:
• Liselda Fabian:
o This should be targeted towards young adults who are unemployed. o Summer programs/internships for high school students to gain monies to assist with college.
• Ebony Batiste: No response
• Illiana Tazar: No response
• Iris Delgado: No response
STAKEHOLDER ZOOM FOCUS GROUP OVERVIEW
On Wednesday, November 20, 2024, an online discussion via Zoom was held at 10 AM. A total of 32 people were invited to attend, which included housing, homeless, and social services groups. During the meeting 14 participants attended and represented the following organizations:
• Huntington Plaza Affordable Housing
• Azure Development
• Century 21 Real Estate
• Linc Housing
• Casa Rita Affordable Housing
• New Start Housing
• Pipeline Health
• Huntington Park Parks and Recreation
• Fair Housing Foundation
• Los Angeles County Library
• Inner City Visions
The meeting started with a presentation on the five-year analysis of impediments and the Consolidated Plan. The topic included funding, outreach purpose and strategy, priority goals, and current projects. At the end of the presentation, the attendees were designated their own breakout room based on their organization type: housing, social services, and homelessness. In the breakout room, the participants were asked to provide verbal input for each question and to fill out their thoughts on the Survey link provided. The summary of the feedback received are below:
THEMES
Affordable Housing
The discussion focused on expanding affordable housing through accessory dwelling units, upzoning, and developer collaboration. Key barriers include a complicated entitlement process, lack of funding, and zoning issues. Solutions include streamlining permits, increasing funding, and exploring alternative housing options.
Tenant Support
Offering incentives for apartment owners to make units available to low-income families is essential. Additionally, there is a strong need for enhanced tenant support, including counseling on rent increases, eviction notices, and tenant rights, to help residents navigate housing challenges and protect their living conditions
Vulnerable Populations Needs
Partnerships with non-profit organizations to better address the needs of low-income families, seniors, youths, and persons with disabilities.
Homeless Populations Needs
supporting vulnerable populations with services like mental health care and job training, Public Facilities and Improvements.
There is a need for more public restrooms, public parking, park ADA upgrades, expanding public Wi-Fi and community centers.
GROUP 1: HOUSING
Question 1: How do you envision the affordable housing landscape evolving over the next 5 years?
• Summary:
o Azure Development envisions the affordable housing landscape in Huntington Park evolving over the next five years by focusing on incentives to encourage and support residents in building Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) for seniors. o However, Linc Housing Corporation raised concerns about the challenges in achieving affordable housing growth due to limited funding and subsidies, which make it difficult to develop affordable housing in the City. They recommended exploring private or philanthropic funding as a key solution and suggested expanding ADUs as an alternative housing option. The cost of building affordable homes is not penciled out and even with free land, affordable housing projects are still in the red.
o New Start Housing Corp suggest that housing units will meet the City’s Housing Element goals. The number of affordable housing units in the next five years will increase by approximately 1600 housing units.
Question 2: In your opinion what are the barriers to building more affordable housing? • Summary:
o Azure Development highlighted the timing of the entitlement process as a key barrier to housing development in Huntington Park, suggesting that refining and restructuring this process could encourage more developers to invest in the City.
The entitlement process needs to be streamlined, fees reduced, and the permitting process needs to be more efficient.
o Linc Housing Corporation expressed concerns about the challenges of building affordable housing in Huntington Park, primarily due to the lack of funding and subsidies. They proposed leveraging private or philanthropic funding to address these issues and emphasized the potential of expanding ADUs as an alternative housing solution. Linc also suggested utilizing SB 4 to leverage church land for affordable housing development, advocating for upzoning, streamlining
ordinances, and incentivizing affordable housing through these changes.
Additionally, they recommended that the City purchase land and issue Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to further promote affordable housing. o New Start Housing Corp raised concerns about the difficulties of working with the City under the HOME and CTAC funding programs and noted that the City’s landlocked status limits opportunities for multi-unit housing. They also pointed out that the City’s policies discourage multi-unit developments, which further restricts the potential for affordable housing growth. They advocated for the City to approve the zoning required to build affordable housing on a lot adjacent to the transportation line.
Question 3: What are some of the meaningful actions that can be taken to more adequately address affordable housing?
• Summary:
o Azure Development emphasized the importance of upzoning and adjusting ordinances to encourage more affordable housing development. They also suggested streamlining the ADU permitting process could lead to immediate improvements.
o Linc Housing Corporation proposed leveraging private or philanthropic funding as a key solution to increasing affordable housing in Huntington Park. They also recommended exploring alternative housing types, such as ADUs, and leveraging SB 4 to utilize church land for affordable housing. Additionally, they advocated for upzoning, streamlining ordinances to incentivize affordable housing, and having the City purchase land and issue Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to further support development. Linc also pointed out that with the transit line coming into the City, Huntington Park has an opportunity to position itself to attract affordable housing and collaborate with developers to secure public funding, such as Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) o New Start Housing Corp recommended changing zoning to be more housingfriendly along the transit line and emphasized the need for the City to be more supportive of multi-unit housing projects, especially those with over 50 units.
Question 4: Do you think home ownership is important to area residents/families? • Summary:
o Everyone agreed that homeownership is important to area residents. In particular, Azure mentioned that it is important to not lose sight of other incomes and housing needs.
Question 5: What do you feel are the City’s Priority Needs for CDBG and HOME funds over the next 5 years?
• Summary:
o Everyone agreed that preserving and creating new affordable housing is a high priority goal for the City. More specifically, Azure development suggested unit
programming. Participants also believe that there is a need to expand community services.
GROUP 2: PUBLIC SERVICES
Question 1: How do you envision the affordable housing landscape evolving over the next 5 years
• Summary:
o New Start, Fair Housing Foundation, Parks and Recreation emphasized the need for more funding to expand programs and build affordable housing to reduce being wait listed.
o The Fair Housing Foundation faces a significant challenge in securing funding, despite the growing need for its services in the City of HP. Their focus is to increase its presence in the community to ensure that residents are informed about where to seek help and how to protect their housing rights. An example is the Salt Lake Park Fair Housing Workshop. Residents need to know who to call for resources to preserve their housing.
o Inner City Vision stated that there is a lack of permanent housing Question 2: Do you know of any community facilities or public improvements needed in the City? (parks, streets, flood prone areas, ADA improvements, facilities for youth/senior) • Summary:
o The Parks and Recreation Department expressed how fortunate the City is for the improvement of Chesley Park, which will make it the first park with ADA accessibility. However, there should also be a focus to update the park's playground to meet ADA standards. There is a need for more public restrooms, particularly at Salt Lake Park, and along Pacific Avenue from Florence to Slauson on Pacific, there are currently no restrooms available for shoppers. The community would benefit by creating pocket parks with restrooms, as businesses charge for restroom access, and there is a broader need for public restrooms. o Fair Housing expressed their gratitude for Parks and Recreation to allow fair housing events to be hosted at Salt Lake Park. They would like to see more access to updated community centers.
o NewStart Housing stated the need for funds to provide space for other non-profit partners to provide services to the community. Salt Lake Park needs some upgrades in the open space/ground and the tennis fields.
Question 3: What meaningful actions can be taken to more adequately address affordable housing?
• Summary:
o Parks and Recreation suggested having information readily available to share with individuals on where to find affordable housing.
o Inner City Visions emphasize on policies that would include incentives for apartment owners to utilize apartment units for low-income populations o Fair Housing stated that affordability remains a major issue statewide, with access to affordable housing being a top priority. Ensuring families are housed, rather than becoming homeless, is crucial. Rent stabilization is of particular interest, as many face challenges in securing affordable housing due to long waiting lists. It is essential for individuals to get on these lists early. Additionally, clients can be referred to available affordable housing units, though the demand continues to outpace supply.
Question 4: How can we ensure that the needs of the City’s most vulnerable populations are adequately met (LMI families, seniors, homeless, persons w/disabilities) • Summary: Azure Development
o New Start suggested thorough assessments done in different sectors of the City, and to partner with nonprofit and for-profit corporation Question 5: Do you feel there is an issue with internet access? • Summary:
o New Start believes that the City needs better service, lower cost internet providers in the area, and for AT&T to continue expanding their fiber optic throughout the City.
o Parks and Recreation stated that it’s important to announce the WIFI access program for its residents. There is a need to distribute flyers to spread the word and provide password information to the community. Marketing materials are essential to ensure residents are aware of this resource. Additionally, Spectrum charges low-income clients more than those in affluent areas like Beverly Hills, highlighting a need for affordable internet options. To address this, a technology class could be offered at the senior center, and efforts should be made to connect with local schools to further support digital inclusion.
Question 6: What do you feel are the City’s Priority Needs for CDBG and HOME funds over the next 5 years?
• Summary:
o New Start thinks Affordable Housing and creating public parking spaces to take advantage of the empty lots around the City are top priorities. o Parks and Recreation thinks homelessness, gang prevention, and affordable housing are the top priority needs. There are many families who live in their car every day.
o Fair Housing Foundation believes in expanding the Fair Housing Services. The organization faces significant challenges in providing counseling on critical housing issues, such as understanding rent increases, eviction notices, and their implications. They also assist residents in navigating how to request necessary repairs related to habitability and explore tenants' rights to reasonable accommodations and modifications. The foundation helps with investigating housing complaints and advising on how to engage Code Enforcement and the Health Department for repair requests. Additionally, they offer guidance on tenant rights and responsibilities, including access to Legal Aid for issues like unlawful detainers and small claims. The foundation plays a vital role in ensuring tenants understand their protections and have the support needed to address housing challenges.
GROUP 3: HOMELESSNESS
Question 1: In your opinion what are the challenges you face providing services over the next 5 years?
• Summary:
o Inner City Vision stated that the primary challenge to providing services is the lack of funding and the lack of permanent housing. There is a critical need for additional funding to expand programs, build more affordable housing, and allow for more hours of service. There is a need to scale services on a 5-year plan with clear paths for prevention, intervention, and outreach to keep people from becoming homeless. Many homeless people struggle with substance abuse, and some are undocumented making it difficult to find housing placement in the current system. There will be an increase in demand for services, the goal is to end homelessness in 5 years, but it’s difficult due to economic and political pressure.
Question 2: Do you know of any community facilities or public improvements needed in the City? (parks, streets, flood prone areas, ADA improvements, facilities for youth/senior) • Summary:
o Inner City Vision stated there is a strong need to improve lighting in specific areas around the park zones, as well as along well-trafficked streets on the outer edges of the City, including the border streets of Vernon, Los Angeles, Maywood, and South Gate. Upgraded lighting would enhance safety and accessibility. Salt Lake Park, the City's largest park, would greatly benefit from renovated restrooms and much-needed lighting improvements. Additionally, a trauma prevention initiative is essential to support at-risk children in the community who are unable to afford sports and recreational activities, providing them with positive alternatives and support. More specifically, there is a need for a activity
facility for at risk youth since there is no trauma prevention at school to prevent children from joining gangs.
Question 3: In your opinion what are the barriers that exist to finding permanent affordable housing?
• Summary:
o Inner City Vision stated barriers to finding permanent affordable housing include an insufficient supply of affordable units, exacerbated by a lack of subsidies, incentives, and zoning changes that restrict development. Local zoning laws and complicated permitting processes further delay the creation of affordable housing, while high construction costs and limited financial incentives make it difficult for developers to build. Financial barriers such as poor credit or prior eviction records also prevent many individuals from accessing available housing.
Anti-discrimination law needs to be enforced to end discrimination based on race, gender, or disability and educate landlords. Additionally, there is a lack of targeted housing options for specific groups, such as women with children, individuals with substance abuse issues, and pet owners, leaving them especially vulnerable.
Question 4: What are some of the meaningful actions that can be taken to more adequately address homelessness in the City?
• Summary:
o Meaningful actions to address homelessness in the City can include creating policies that prioritize affordable housing development and provide support for vulnerable populations. This could involve working with landlords and housing management to establish agreements that reserve a portion of rental units for individuals experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness. Policies should focus on providing housing with supportive services, such as mental health care, substance abuse treatment, and job training. Additionally, creating incentives for landlords to accept tenants with barriers like poor credit or prior evictions, alongside tenant protection laws to prevent discrimination, would help ensure housing stability. Streamlining the permitting process for affordable housing and offering financial assistance to both tenants and developers can further aid in addressing homelessness effectively.
Question 5: How can we ensure that the needs of the City’s most vulnerable populations are adequately met (LMI families, seniors, homeless, persons w/disabilities) • Summary:
o Conducting comprehensive community assessments will help identify specific needs, while partnering with community-based organizations can provide direct insights and feedback from those most affected. Improving accessibility and infrastructure, particularly in housing and public services, is essential for ensuring these populations have equitable access. Strengthening community engagement by involving vulnerable groups in decision-making processes will help ensure their voices are heard. Expanding homelessness prevention programs and providing subsidiary housing options for the most vulnerable families can reduce displacement and prevent homelessness. Additionally, connecting seniors and undocumented families to existing resources and services will ensure they can access the support they need to thrive.
Question 6: Do you feel there is an issue with internet access? • Summary:
o There are still some spaces and families that need access to the internet.
However, the Parks does have public access to WIFI. The rest of the City will follow soon, and families will no longer have to struggle and pay $50-$90 for WiFi at home.
Question 7: What are the City’s Priority Needs for CDBG and HOME funds over the next 5 years?
• Summary:
o First, affordable housing preservation and development must be a top priority, with a particular emphasis on creating low-income housing for families, not just individuals. This includes repurposing single-family homes into multi-family housing, like initiatives across other Los Angeles cities. Additionally, homelessness prevention and support services will need continued funding to help address and reduce homelessness in the community. Youth and senior services should also be prioritized, ensuring that development and accessibility meet the needs of these groups. Ultimately, the City should focus on affordable housing and enhancing services to support vulnerable populations across the community.
COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY
The City of Huntington Park conducted a community survey from October 15, 2024, to November 15, 2024, to gather input for the City’s 2024-2029 Consolidated Plan. A total of 291 residents participated, with 237 responding in English and 54 in Spanish. The survey included 23 questions aimed at gauging public opinion on priority goals for the upcoming planning cycle.
Topics covered in the survey ranged from housing and community facilities to homeless housing, neighborhood improvements, community service needs, broadband access, and disaster preparedness. The result of this survey provides valuable insights into the needs and priorities of the community.
THEMES
Affordable Housing
1. Owner occupied housing rehabilitation
2. Increased Senior housing units
3. Construction of new affordable rental housing
4. Low barrier to affordable housing development
5. Affordable rent
Public Services
1. Neighborhood crime prevention
2. Park and Recreation programs
3. Law enforcement services
4. Needed elderly services
5. Afterschool Program
Homeless Populations Needs
1. Permanent supportive housing with social services
2. Rent/utility payment assistance
3. Emergency/overnight shelters
Public Facilities and Improvements.
1. Street/Alley/sidewalk improvements
2. Safety improvement (street lighting, traffic calming)
3. Tree planting and urban greenery
4. Poor condition of parks, roads, and public spaces
5. Flood prevention in areas near Los Angeles Rivers and streets such as Pacific Blvd, Florence, Firestone, and Gage Ave
6. Parking
7. Salt Lake Park Improvement
Economic Development
1. Job creation/ job generating businesses
2. College readiness programs
3. Job readiness programs
4. Available jobs near home
Fair Housing Services
1. Family/Children
2. Race
3. Anti-discrimination education and enforcement
Broadband
1. Affordability
2. Expanding Broadband Infrastructure
a. Southeast Huntington Park
b. Specific Street: Arbutus Ave, Stafford Ave, Malabar St c. Public Spaces: Salt Lake Park and Walnut Park
3. More Service Providers
SURVEY RESULT
1. Are you a resident of the City?
A total of 288 participants responded to the question and 3 skipped. Many of the participants are renters at 52% and 43% are homeowners. A total of 14 survey respondents selected others, making up 5% of the total. Those who selected others include residents who reside with their families, work in the City, and one was forcibly evicted.
Below is the breakdown of respondents who answered other:
123
151
14 Homeowner
Renter
Other (please specify)
Resident Work
• Resident • Business
• Living with family who are
homeowners in Huntington Park
• I work for HSA Home Delivered
Meals which services Seniors in
the City.
• Member of my household is the
homeowner
• First Baptist Church of Huntington
Park
• Lived there previously. Family lives
there now.
Evicted
• 20 years • Was forcibly evicted
• Living at parent's property
• Raised in HP
• Live with family
• Living with parents because I can’t
afford to move out
• Been in H.P since the day I was
born
• Resident
2. How long have you lived in the City?
A total of 288 participants responded to the question and 3 skipped. The majority of respondents have lived in the City for more than 10 years totaling 237 residents making up 82% of the total count. People who lived in the City between 5 to 10 years totaled 36 and making up 13%, 11 people lived in the City between 1 to 4 years, 2 less than a year, and 2 who do not live in the City.
3. What is your race/ethnicity?
2 10
28 193
2 0
1 8
44 0
0 50 100 150 200
Less than a year
1 to 4 years
5 to 10 years
Over 10 years
I do not live in the city
Spanish
English
A total of 287 respondents answered and 4 skipped this question. Most of the participants are of Hispanic or Latino origin, making a total of 257 people, which is 89% of the total. White total to 16 people, there were 2 Asians, 2 Blacks, and 2 American Indian. 18 of the respondents chose not to say.
4. What languages do you speak at home?
Most of the participants speak English at home totaling to 142, making up 49% of the total. There were 106 who responded that they speak Spanish at home which is 37%.
There were respondents chose to specify other languages making up 14% and all of them speak both English and Spanish at home.
5. How old are you?
13 2
2 208
2 0
16 3
0 0
49 0
0 2
0 50 100 150 200 250
White or Caucasian
Black or African American
Asian or Asian American
Hispanic or Latino Another race
American Indian or Alaska Native
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Islander
Prefer not to say
Spanish
English
142
106
40 English
Spanish
Other (please specify)
A total of 289 respondents answered this question and 2 skipped it. The number of people who are between 25-34, 25-44, and 45-54 make up 75% of the total respondent.
Most of the people are between the age 35-44, totaling 73 people (25%), 69 people (24%) are between 45-54.
6. Please indicate the top three (3) social services that you feel should receive financial support from the City.
Result:
• Neighborhood crime prevention
• Park and recreation programs
• Law enforcement services
There was a total of 279 respondents for the question and 12 skipped. There was a total of 237 English and 54 Spanish respondents. The top three social services that participants feel are priority needs are neighborhood crime prevention programs, park and recreation programs, and law enforcement services.
The top 3 priorities between English and Spanish respondents vary slightly. When looking at English respondents, 91 support neighborhood crime prevention, 74 support Park and Recreation Program, and 67 support law enforcement services. The top 3 priorities for Spanish respondents are park and recreation program (22), neighborhood crime prevention (16), and legal services (14). Both English and Spanish respondents strongly support neighborhood crime prevention and parks and recreation program. 5 17
63 73
69 28
30 9
2%
6%
22%
25%
24%
10%
10%
3%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Prefer not to say
Below is the breakdown of respondents who answered other:
Special Needs (9) Street Beautification (16)
• Senior Citizens
Programs
• More greenery and clean
streets
• Solutions to address
quality of life issues. Focus
on beautifying the
community, parking, etc.
• Health programs for
elderly residents
• More greenery, ex: more
trees
• Climate Change Services
• More handicap access.
Wheelchair
• Cleanliness of the City • More greenery and clean
streets
• Elderly services • Clean streets • More greenery, ex: more trees
• Disabled people • City beautification • Cleanliness of the City • More handicap access.
Wheelchair
• Maintenance there is
trash all over our City.
• Clean streets
• A program for income
control for retirees
• Cleanliness of the City • Street repair
• Community Exercise
for Seniors
• Clean streets • Safety, cleanliness, benefit
for schools
0 74
91 16
28 28
53 37
34 33
31 22
49 23
32 67
19 15
21 15
28 10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Park and recreation programs
Neighborhood crime prevention programs
Legal services
Disaster and emergency preparedness measures
Other (please specify)
After-school programs & summer day camp for children
Services and shelter for homeless people
Programs for at-risk youth
Health care services
Job training and/or placement
Food or meals for residents with special needs
Revitalization of deteriorated commercial areas
Counseling/emotional support
Special events, festivals & community gatherings
Providing law enforcement services
Drug/alcohol abuse counseling/treatment
Providing fire protection services
Public arts programs
Childcare
Low-cost transportation services (Dial-A-Ride/City…
Assistance in resolving disputes
• entertaining and
physical activities for
the community
Parking (9) Other
• Parking issues • Parking • Too many thefts
• Parking issues. • More patrolling our area • Huntington Park Renter Care Services
• Parking enforcement • Parking Stations • Rebuild playground at Salt Lake Park
• Street speed bumps • Parking enforcement,
parking permits, public
parking
• Bring back the City fair.
• More parking
enforcement and police
patrols
• Huntington Park Renter
Care Services
Home Repair (2) • Pet Park
• Home inspectors at hp
who have owners fix
damage
• Low-cost home
repair support for
homeowners
• Citizenship and Human
Resources Classes
• Home repair
assistance
• Tenant Protection. You
don't have any protection,
that's why landlords abuse
us tenants
7. Choose up to three (3) of the most critical community facilities needed in your community.
Result:
1. Park and recreational facilities
151
127
110
85 72
70 65
56 43
22 0 50 100 150 200
Park and recreational facilities
Community centers
Youth centers
Senior centers
Fire station and equipment
Libraries
Healthcare facilities
Childcare centers
American Disability Act Improvements…
Other (please specify)
2. Community center
3. Youth center.
There was a total of 271 respondents to this question and 20 skipped. Out of the respondents 221 were in English and 50 in Spanish. Based on the poll, the top three priority community facilities needed in the community are park and recreational facilities, community center, and youth center.
When looking at priority for English and Spanish survey responses, the top 3 priority goals for both are the same. In English, 125 respondents chose park and recreational facilities (57%), 103 for community center (47%), and 92 for youth center (42%). In Spanish, 26 chose park and recreational facilities (52%), 24 for community center (48%), and 18 for youth center (36%).
Additionally, 22 respondents chose to answer other, the specific comments are listed below:
Hospital (2) Youth (2)
• Build a better Hospital in
Huntington Park • School Tutoring Centers
• Another hospital because the
community hospital is not enough • Job training for youth Crime Prevention (3) Street Parking (3)
• Police.. • Better street parking
• police patrol • Spacious for parking cars
• crime watch/prevention
• Erase the small red lines.
(Parking)
Community Center (6) Other
• Salt lake park • Veterans Services
• Community garden • Help for people's pets
• Information Centers for the
residents of Huntington Park • Homeowners Fly Protection • Recreation centers such as
community pool
• Bible study centers in the library
or municipality. We are here to
serve you
• Swimming pool • Homeless shelters too many
homeless in the City
• Swimming Pool
8. Choose up to three (3) of the most critical infrastructure needed in your community.
Result:
1. Street/Alley/sidewalk improvements
2. Safety improvement (street lighting, traffic calming)
3. Tree planting and urban greenery
There was a total of 271 respondents to this question and 20 skipped. Out of the respondents 221 were in English and 50 in Spanish. Based on the poll, the top three priority community facilities needed in the community street/alley/sidewalk improvements, safety improvement (street lighting, traffic calming), and tree planting and urban greenery.
When looking at priority for English and Spanish survey responses, the top 3 priority goals for both are the same. In English, 152 advocated for street/alley/sidewalk improvements (64%), 147 for safety improvement (street lighting, traffic calming) (62%), and 101 to tree planting and urban greenery (43%). In Spanish, 38 advocated for street/alley/sidewalk improvements (70%), 33 for safety improvement (street lighting, traffic calming) (61%), and 25 to tree planting and urban greenery (46%).
Additionally, 7 responded to others, the specific comments are listed below:
Safety (3) Others
• More security at night in the streets
and alleys
• Protect pets for pets (how much
does a pet have to pay to the
homeowner) do pets pay rent?
• Increased police surveillance, lots
of vehicle thefts
• Improved the main Boulevard
street with better shopping,
restaurant, movie theater.
• Gang • Help for older adults
• Eliminate Large Garbage at
Banquet
190
180
126
108
101
67 34
28 7
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Street/alley/sidewalk improvements
Safety improvements (street lighting, traffic calming)
Tree planting and urban greenery
Water/sewage improvements
Graffiti removal
Broadband internet connectivity
ADA to public roads and facilities
Access to free EV charging stations
Others
9. Choose up to three (3) of the most critical economic development needs in your community.
Result:
1. Job creation/ job generating businesses
2. College readiness programs
3. Job readiness programs
4. Available jobs near home
There was a total of 266 respondents to this question and 25 skipped. Out of the respondents 217 were in English and 49 in Spanish. Based on the poll, the top three priority critical economic needs in the community are job creation/ job generating businesses, college readiness programs, job readiness programs, and available jobs near home.
When looking at priority for English and Spanish survey responses, the top 3 priority goals for both are slightly different. In English, 144 people responded job creation/ job generating businesses (61%), 114 college readiness programs (48%), and 104 available jobs near home (44%). In Spanish, 35 advocated job creation/ job generating businesses (65%), 25 college readiness programs (46%), and 28 job readiness programs (52%).
Additionally, 13 responded to others, the specific comments are listed below:
Others
Housing (2)
• affordable housing.
• We have the highest taxes in our
area, but our City does not reflect
that.
• Housing Support/Workshops
• Salt lake park
179
139
127
127
100
91 13
0 50 100 150 200
Job creation/job generating businesses
College readiness programs
Job readiness programs
Available jobs in close proximity to home
Counseling and training to entrepreneurs
Grant and loans to small businesses
Other (please specify)
Jobs (2) • Veterans Services
• Ada jobs • Good nutrition programs
• Bring more high-tech jobs to the
area
• DACA recipient funding for higher
education
Add Business (2) • Victim of Violence
• Revitalize pacific. Open chain
restaurants/ name stores. Make it
open shopping area like Pasadena
• We have the highest taxes in our
area, but our City does not reflect
that.
• Creating new businesses or stores
in peaceful light compared to
years ago
• More parking for apartment
people because homeowners
have their parking and take their
cars out and inside alone and we
don't have parking
10. Choose up to three (3) of the most critical housing needs in your community.
Result:
1. Renter occupied housing rehabilitation
2. Increased Senior housing units
3. Construction of new affordable rental housing
There was a total of 252 respondents to this question and 39 skipped. Out of the respondents 208 were in English and 29 in Spanish. Based on the poll, the top three priority critical housing needs in the community are renter occupied housing rehabilitation, increased senior housing units, and construction of new affordable rental housing. However, when looking at priority for English and Spanish survey responses, the top 3 priority goals for both are very different.
In English, the top three priorities are renter occupied housing rehabilitation, increased senior housing units, and construction of new affordable rental housing. There were 120 52 86
133
56 54
61 38
59 42
26 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
First time home buyer program assistance
Construction of new affordable rental…
Renter occupied housing rehabilitation
Owner occupied housing rehabilitation
Accessibility improvements
Increased housing for large families
Adjustment to local zoning and building…
Increased housing for those with disabilities
Accessory dwelling units (ADU)
Other (please specify)
Answer Choices
who responded to renter occupied housing rehabilitation (50%), 95 to increased senior housing units (40%), and 72 to construction of new affordable rental housing (30%).
In Spanish, the top three priorities are increased senior housing units, first time home buyer program assistance, and new affordable housing units. There were 31 who responded to increased senior housing units (57%), 16 to first home time buyer assistance (39%), and 14 construction of new affordable rental housing (26%).
Additionally, 13 responded to others, the specific comments are listed below:
Parking (6)
• Parking problems Affordable Housing (5)
• Parking • Affordable housing
• Parking restrictions/ and more
towing n ticketing • Affordable housing
• Parking for vehicles
• Rezone abandoned shops into
housing
• No Parking too Many cars • multifamily housing units
• Apartments exist without available
parking and new ones are built.
Single family homes have become
multigenerational due to economic
reasons without adequate parking
for the residents. New housing
developments should have
appropriate parking.
• Affordable housing for working
families, not just for those that
are surviving off benefits.
Home Repair Program (2)
• Home repair assistance, home
maintenance assistance for
Affordable Rent (4) people with disabilities
• Rent Control • Owner occupied housing
rehabilitation that won’t trigger
• Rental housing inspection program reassessments
• Pass rent control in Huntington Park Others (3)
• Stop cash for keys offers/ stop
gentrification in HP/ actually make
renting affordable not evict old
tenants
• landowner standards and
regular reviews of property
• City to hold HOA community to
fix their areas.
• Removal of unused
communication cables.
11. How would you rate the availability of affordable housing options in your community?
There was a total of 252 who responded to this question. We received 208 responses in English and 44 responses in Spanish. The majority of the respondents believe that the availability of affordable housing in the community is poor, 145 responses which accounts for 50% of the total. There were 73 who think that the availability of affordable housing in the community is fair, which accounts for 25%.
12. In your opinion, which neighborhoods or areas within your community face the greatest housing challenges? (Please Specify)
There were 127 participants who responded to this question. Most of the respondents believe that the whole City faces housing challenges, The main issue is the lack of affordable cost of housing in the City and many want to see rent control taking place.
Residents are seeing that landlord charging a high rent with substandard quality and lack of parking spaces. Specifically, an area that is a major concern for residents is Pacific Blvd. Other notable areas include Randolph, Florence, and Santa Fe.
All of Huntington Park (34)
• Huntington Park, CA • All over Huntington Park
• the entire City • Huntington Park
• Most of the City • Huntington Park
• All of Huntington Park • All City
• All HP • all Huntington Park
• All of it • Huntington park
• All areas • Hp
• all of HP • The whole City
• Huntington Park • Whole City
• All City • Huntington Park
• All the community • Huntington park
• All • Condominiums in hp
• All • all
5 29
73 145
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
• Huntington Park housing is no
longer affordable, and it is limited.
• All. The entire City seems
overcrowded.
• All of Huntington Park has very
little affordable housing.
• All of HP should have fair
affordable housing
• In my opinion, most areas are
facing challenges because there is
too much rental demand and too
little space
• Everywhere there is no affordable
housing.
• This is a difficult question to
answer as the City needs minor
improvements that would make a
huge difference.
• I feel housing in general is scarce
throughout HP. There are few
rental vacancies, and those that
do exist are inadequate
Pacific Blvd (10) Randolph (2)
• The homes in the Pacific Blvd.
area Pacific Blvd area
• Behind Huntington Park high
school. Residential street along
Randolph street.
• Pacific Blvd area • Randolph/Bear
• West of Pacific Blvd Florence (5)
• From pacific to miles (west & east
bound), from Florence to
Randolph (north& south bound)
• Florence/Seville, Pacific Blvd/ 55th
st.
• Area around pacific blvd
• The Florence and Templeton and
Stanford Area
• everywhere, but mainly around
Pacific.
• Seville y Florence
• Smaller streets near passing
Pacific Ave.
• Homeless problem on Florence
effects property value.
• Areas closer to Pacific Blvd
• Florence, State Street and Pacific
Blvd.
• Along Pacific Blvd. Santa Fe (5)
• Pacific Blvd • Santa Fe y Alameda
Other Areas (13)
• Housing that boarders Santa Fe or
Alameda
• Slauson between miles and
Seville. Slauson business and
street need a lot of improvement
• The western portion of our City by
Santa Fe Ave
• Middleton street. All are really
expensive rent, and we never
have parking
• Through the Santa Fe and
Randolph area. There are not
even parking lots
• Northwest and northeast • Santa Fe y Alameda
• East quadrant of HP Areas Bordering the City (8)
• the strip • Walnut park
• green areas • Walnut Park
• Downtown
• Border line more crime in those
areas
• Hometown and condos
• areas bordering Maywood with
high congestion
• Areas Near Schools • Huntington Park, Bell, Maywood
• Gang infested neighborhoods
• HP/Bell//Vernon/Los Angeles
county
• The area by City hall has a
notable amount of unhoused
people.
• Vernon/HP borderline and LA/HP
borderline
• Neighborhoods with most
apartments
• Border of Huntington Park and
walnut
• Salt lake park need to be built
back
Parking (5)
• Parking
• Area with factories in them. A lot of
empty lots that could be used for
housing or business.
• We need handicap parking spaces
in all streets of HP.
No Response (8) • no parking.
• Idk • Parking
• None
• Neighboring cities park in our
cities due to lack of parking
• N/A All of Los Angeles (4)
• N A • All Los Angeles
• Don't understand the question. • Southeast Los Angeles • Unsure • All of SELA
• I do not know. • Los Angeles City
• None.
• Unsure.
Overcrowded Apartments (4)
• Stop building multi-level apartment buildings in HP. We are already densely populated and struggling with parking shortage. Push back against Sacramento. No ADU’S.
• Overcrowded apartments
• Some areas are affected by little space and many people living in that area • Apartment buildings often don’t have the resources for bigger families. There is also an issue with a lack of parking spaces in many areas of Huntington Park.
High Cost of Housing (19)
• Cost of Housing
• Areas where new construction occurs. Increased housing costs monthly increase, as opportunities take advantage.
• Tenants do what they want because they know they will be jeopardized. • The whole City needs help with regulating rent and rent control. Landlords are charging way too much money for housing that sometimes isn't even that great.
• more there is not enough
• Each area has its challenges, but housing prices and rent costs are far too high and we’re at risk of gentrification if those who have lived here for years are priced out.
• I have witnessed many multi-generation families still living together because they are unable to move out on their own. Many of these families are working individuals but still are unable to afford rent. There is not assistance for those that right above the poverty line.
• Old tenants (especially those of undocumented status) are currently facing evictions across HP. It’s one to approve more housing and another to not see the consequences of landlords taking advantage of this situation to evict oldtime tenants to put new tenants with rents above the average rent. • Affordable rent in decent homes/appt. Not quite sure how landlords get away with the living conditions from some of these properties • Apartment Dwelling
• Rent for apartments is very high and there is no parking available. • Exaggerated high costs of rent collection
• Extreme rent expensive.
• Expensive rent collection
• The rent is expensive and there is no parking
• The City of Huntington Park is facing excessive rent charges (we need clear language of. Rent is paid per bedroom, 2 bedrooms, 3 bedrooms - studios - houses - for owners do not charge high prices and they have rent control ). • Price
• Most of the City is paying so much rent for buildings that lack improvements. • Basically, the rent or sale housing way to for anyone to afford.
13. Which of the following do you believe are the most significant barriers to accessing housing in your community?
Result:
1. Affordability
2. High deposit and down payment cost
3. Availability
There was a total of 246 respondents to this question and 45 skipped. Out of the respondents 202 were in English and 44 in Spanish. Based on the poll, the top three 108
69 33
17 9
8 2
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Affordability
High deposit and or down payment cost
Availability
Zoning regulations that restrict multifamily
and or accessory dwelling units
Other (please specify)
Lack of transportation options
Discrimination
significant barriers to accessing housing in the community are affordability, high deposit and down payment cost, and availability.
14. How informed do you feel about your rights and responsibilities as a tenant or homeowner in your community?
There was a total of 245 respondents to this question, 202 in English and 43 in Spanish.
From the total, the majority (42%) of the respondents feel that they are only somewhat informed. 38% of the respondents are not very informed. Additionally, English and Spanish respondent feel differently about how they are informed about their rights.
The majority (56%) of Spanish respondents feel that they are not very informed and 33% feel somewhat informed. Meanwhile, 43% of English respondents feel somewhat informed and 38% are not very informed.
15. Which of the following factors do you believe contribute to housing discrimination in your community?
Result:
1. Family/Children
2. Race
There was a total of 222 respondents who answered the question. The respondents feel that family/children and race are the top two reasons for housing discrimination.
There was 66 people who responded others, the summary of those comments are below:
The most common factors contributing to housing discrimination in Huntington Park are income and economic status, legal and immigration status, age, and pet-related issues. 103
93 30
19 Somewhat informed
Not very informed
Not informed at all
Very Informed
The primary concern is the affordability of housing, which affects both renters and potential homeowners.
Income (13) Legal Status (3)
• Income • Legal residential status
• Age and Income • Legal status
• Income • immigration status
• Income Age (3)
• Socioeconomic status • Age
• Income • Age
• Income • Age; young adults
• Income
• Income
• Economic status
• Earning income asking up to 3
times wage
Other
• Humanity
• Financial background • Language barrier
• Financial • Local government
Pets (7)
• having my puppy (the owner wants to charge rent to my puppy) and harasses my parents
• Pets, landlords ask us for pet insurance and pay pet rent • Homeowners don't have pets my pet is my family I don't know Where to get help
• Pets that are not in the contracts (harass us)
• Pets (do landlords want us to charge rent for having pets or insurance? (Having clear language that says dogs is dangerous? And how much will be paid for insurance)- as well.
• having my puppy (the owner wants to charge rent to my puppy) and harasses my parents
96 84
66 57
44 30
7 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Family/children
Race
Other (please specify)
Ethnicity
Disability
Gender
Religion
Affordability (11)
• Excessive rent increase
• affordability • Affordability
• Affordability • Affordability
• Affordable • Pricing and high barrier of entry
• Price. • affordability
• The only factor that may lead a
property owner from renting to an
individual is the fact that the tenant
may not be responsible in paying
for their own housing
• In our area I don't think we have a
discrimination problem. We have
an affordability problem, for both
buyers and renters.
None (17)
• Things are fair • N/A
• Have not experienced it • NONE
• I have not experienced
discrimination • None
• None. • None
• Income • none
• Language spoken • None
• N/A • Don’t know
• None
• Unknown - can’t say I’ve
experienced this
• In my situation it's none of the above. My slumlord could care less about how many people, race, gender etc. live in his properties. If you show him the money, the deal is done. May I add he does not upkeep any of his properties.
Many complaints registered in HP City hall of him.
16. Do you think there are disparities in access to quality housing based on income level or socioeconomic status in your community?
185
16 41
Yes
No
Not sure
There was a total of 242 respondents who answered the question. The majority of respondents agree that there are disparities in access to quality housing based on income level or socioeconomic status with a total of 185 people making up 76%.
17. Which initiatives or programs do you believe would be most effective in addressing housing inequalities in your community?
Result:
1. Low barrier to affordable housing development
2. Anti-discrimination education and enforcement
3. Needed elderly services
The total respondents to this question were 233, 189 in English and 44 in Spanish. A total of 87 respondents believes that low barrier to affordable housing would be the most effective in addressing housing inequality, making up 37%.
18. Choose up to three (3) of the most critical homelessness needs in your community.
Result:
1. Permanent supportive housing with social services
2. Rent/utility payment assistance
3. Emergency/overnight shelters
The total number of respondents to this question was 225, 183 was received in English and 42 was received in Spanish. The three topmost critical homeless needs in the City are permanent supportive housing with social services (45%), rent/utility payment assistance (44%), and emergency/overnight shelters (43%). 87 25
24 22
15 14
13 12
11 10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Low barrier affordable housing development
Anti-discrimination education and…
Needed elderly services
People-focused zoning policy reform
Needed family services
Other (please specify)
English proficiency classes
Homeless individual and family services
Wrap-around services for families moving…
Public transit availability
Both the Spanish and English respondents have the same top three priority. For permanent supportive housing with social services, 81 responses received in English and 20 in Spanish. For rent/utility payment assistance, 79 responses were received in English and 20 in Spanish. For emergency and overnight shelters, 76 was received in English and 20 in Spanish.
The list of answers for respondents for others is below:
Mental Health and Job Support
• Go through the streets and take them to a safe place for themselves and for the people who walk on the streets, because they are scared to see people sleeping on the street
• Rehab centers and help them find a job
• First in order to end homelessness we need to provide training, for some counseling, jobs. We can’t keep funding them, they will need to go find a job and continue, maybe have follow-up training.
• Mental support
• find a way where mental illness people get help in a mental hospital Other None
• None, don't need more people on
our City with extra programs • No loitering enforcement • Don't care
• Some homeless don't want to be
helped
• None
• Public safety and cleanliness from
homeless population in our
community.
• I have no knowledge of homeless
people
• Affordable housing for all
individuals.
101
99 96
88 72
47 45
36 16
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Permanent supportive housing with social services
Rent/utility payment assistance
Emergency/overnight shelters
Transitional housing short term up to six months
Free meals in a safe place
Free or affordable public transit passes
Childcare
Street medicine
Other (please specify)
19. In your opinion, does the City provide sufficient resources and support services for homeless individuals and families in your community? There was a total of 228 respondents to this question, 187 responded in English and 41 in Spanish, and 63 skipped. Most of the respondents believe that the City needs to provide more resources and support for homeless individuals.
Respondents agree that while there are some resources and efforts in place to assist homeless individuals and families in Huntington Park, there seems to be a significant gap in awareness of these services. Many residents are either not informed about the programs or feel that there is insufficient outreach. Additionally, there are calls for more funding to expand services and concerns about the increasing visibility of homelessness in the neighborhood.
Result:
1. Uncertainty, lack of awareness, and the need to increase outreach
2. Increased funding and support
List of respondents answered for others is below:
Not Sure (30)
• N/a • Unsure • Not aware
• not sure • Not sure • Not sure
• I don't know • Not sure • I'm not sure
• Don’t know • Not sure • Don't care
• I don't know. • Don’t know • I don't know
• don't know • I don’t think so
• I am not aware of
any
• Not sure • I don't know • Not sure
• Idk • Unsure • I do not know
40 139
49 Yes
No
Other (please specify)
• Not sure • I'm not sure • I have no knowledge
• Not sure
• We don't know
• Unaware given little
to no homeless
persons seen on
the streets I live
near.
More Funding Needed (3)
• Yes, but it needs more funding
• Yes, we appreciate your help, but the City has more needs. • Yes, there is support but you could have more
More Outreach is needed (7)
• I think they are working on it. All that remains is how to get more people to get the information
• I don't feel adequately knowledgeable to be able to give a helpful opinion, but I can say that before 2010, homeless residents were not as visible to most peoples' daily lives as they are today, fourteen years later. Put succinctly, there are either more homeless residents within City limits, or they are simply more visible for reasons unknown to me.
• I am not sure how homeless people will get information. If the City does outreach by going to encampments or finding homeless individuals on the street, then yes.
• I don't think so, we don't even have enough information on what goes on in our City.
• I am not familiar with the help the homeless get in my community • I'm not sure what programs the City offers as I have never been in the position to have to seek the resource.
• Not aware of any resources/services for homeless individuals Other (5)
• In some programs there great but for fixing road still needs to be a little better and having another hospital
• Huntington Park doesn't care about their residents
• The homeless population is making our community unsafe and dirty. Please clean our community of trash.
• No more housing for the homeless direct that money to education. Keep our streets clean. Stop defunding the police
• Homelessness keeps growing. New faces every week.
20. Do you feel there are any places in the City of Huntington Park that lack highspeed internet service or connectivity?
A total of 221 responded to the question, 181 in English and 40 in Spanish. Most (65 %) of the respondents think that the City does not have places that lack high speed internet or service.
For those who answered otherwise, they want to have better broadband infrastructure, more service providers, and affordable access to high-speed internet in Huntington Park, particularly in areas near schools, parks, and specific residential streets. Additionally, tackling issues like signal instability and high costs would help improve connectivity.
Result:
1. Southeast Huntington Park
2. Specific Street: Arbutus Ave, Stafford Ave, Malabar St
3. Public Spaces: Salt Lake Park and Walnut Park
Responses for the questions are listed below:
Specific Streets (9) Schools (5)
• Arbutus Ave • Near Maywood academy
• Stafford avenue
• Area near San Antonio
Elementary
• Seville/Gage • Around schools
• Santa Ana and State section
• The community Around
Huntington Park high school
• Malabar st • Near Linda Marquez high school
• Santa Fe / Saladin
• State/Florence Parks (6)
• on Florence and miles • Parks
• Miles Ave by City hall • Parks
• From pacific Blvd. to miles Ave • In some areas like the parks • Randolph and pacific Ave • Salt Lake Park
143
78 No
Yes
Specific Areas (8) • Parks
• South Huntington Park, Borderline
with South Gate
• Homes surrounding Salt Lake
park, particularly worse as you get
closer to the train tracks
• Southeast side
• Verizon wireless is weak in the
Huntington Park streets near
Walnut Park.
• South
• Southeast HP, near South Gate Free Internet (4)
• North/East Huntington Park
• Free internet, to bring down
prices.
• Downtown
• Public Broadband in the whole
City
• Out lining areas of City • Free internet
• The whole district or 5 has not fast
inter • Low-cost internet for adults
Huntington Park City (17)
• The areas where the plane passes the signal drops. All of Southeast East Los Angeles is not broadband. We have no fiber optic frequency • The City lacks broadband, the signal goes down when the plane passes by and 3 devices at the same time, the internet goes down in the area where he lived
• high traffic public places
• All over
• There are areas where internet does not work.
• Some areas don’t have great service
• in my home and throughout the City of Huntington park • My house
• My house. But for grabbing the internet, it's bad
• The whole community
• there are always problems with the internet
• My house has terrible Internet service
• Different housing units throughout Huntington Park
• Throughout the City, access is very poor
• It doesn’t work
• Everywhere, Wi-Fi is slow or unsafe
• Have high speed internet but bad signal
Bring More Internet Provider (13)
• I have 5 months without Internet. Because the cables are allegedly stolen • What you pay is what you get
• Have better companies
• Internet service is costly, and some may have limited high speed data • There are no other options for the internet besides Spectrum. Some phone companies do not work in Huntington park.
• High internet prices are paid
• immigrant households
• I just know a lot of families can’t afford internet and we can maybe work on improving this
• there are still people who do not have high-speed Internet, there has been • I have to subscribe the lowest fiber internet due to pricing • No fiber optic available for purchase
• Malabar st between Randolph and Slauson has only one internet provider which makes it a monopoly on this small area. We need more choices. Google fiber would be an amazing choice to have.
• Some streets don’t have what’s needed to have a high-speed internet
21. How can broadband internet access be improved? (Please Specify) There were 118 respondents to this question and 173 skipped.
The community expressed a strong need for more affordable internet options, particularly for low-income families, with many suggesting subsidies or free access.
There is also a call to expand broadband infrastructure by improving coverage, speed, and adding more towers across the City. Additionally, residents want more competition among internet providers to reduce high costs and offer more affordable options like Google Fiber.
Result:
1. Affordability
2. Expanding Broadband Infrastructure
3. More Service Providers
Among those who answered, the summary is below:
Affordability (13)
• Competition, lower prices.
• free internet for all Huntington Park residents.
• Make sure everyone can get it
• Have free access
• Yes, make it free
• Low-cost Wi-Fi
• Low-cost internet
• Low-income assets
• Every time I try to join it gives me an error code
• Give hotspot Wi-Fi to families in need. Or have some form of program with internet providers that the City can help pay or reduce the Wi-Fi cost and will be able for families to access this tool for productivity. • Allow affordable network in
• more affordable
• Lower Prices. I only have internet because my kids need it to complete their homework
• Internet plans for qualified low-income families.
• Broadband and cost
• Make more public Wi-Fi
• More access to public Wi-Fi
• Low cost for retirees or free
• the prices, more programs to make the service accessible • With resources and help from the City
• More affordable prices
• Must be a good quality with lower prices
• Make it more accessible (less expensive)
• I liked it when there was a subsidy on internet when there was a connectivity program under Pres. Biden when he just started his term.
Bring in More Service Providers (18)
• yes, allow other internet companies to do business in HP. I have spectrum and their prices are high, and I can't move with T-Mobile which offers better pricing. • Bring competitors, develop municipal broadband
• We need more competition of internet providers. Google fiber being affordable and fast is an example of what we should have
• There are limited options when choosing a provider. Service is expensive. • Have more contracts with internet service companies that are willing to not charge so much for their tv services or internet services • Have fiber internet everywhere
• having broadband and having more accessible internet providers. • Changing the infrastructure with the latest in accessible technology and price that come to An arrangement with Internet companies
• We pay expensive and there is a poor internet signal
• Work with providers to improve coverage and expand free or low-cost programs
• Hold companies accountable to providing top service in our City. • More Internet companies to serve the area
• More companies or services near me
• Let’s get different vendors in HP- fiber optic options • Have better company
• Certain areas I heard don’t do certain internet companies • I think internet service is very expensive
• It would be nice if internet service were lower in cost Expand Broadband Infrastructure (27)
• Places with internet
• Have 2 or 3 people using it at once. Right now we don't have that (the signal drops when 3 devices use the internet.
• Put into more areas of the City
• We need pole cabling and proper broadband installation. • More speed
• Speed up Wi-Fi
• Less traffic more antenna?
• Have broadband infrastructure
• Provide more hot spot points
• Get more satellite
• Expanding coverage
• More towers
• Installing what it needs to be done in every single street around the City to be able to connect to broadband internet.
• Stronger signal City wide
Offering free access to Wi-Fi in public spaces.
• More public notices that Wi-Fi is available and were. • The wiring and other infrastructure can be replaced
• It allows access
• Update systems
• Needs more faster speed and more towers nearby
• Adding free Wi-Fi in high traffic public places such as Pacific Blvd • more fluidity - some places are spotty, or you drop all together • High-powered distributor antennas.
• More internet towers
• More than what Is available More places to access Internet • Improve existing infrastructure
• Ideally, it would be accessible everywhere within City limits. I don't personally use it, and as such, am unaware as to the service parameters or its ubiquity, however faster service and more access to residents within HP (at reasonable cost to the municipal budget) is what I'm inclined to support. • I should put more devices. so that we have internet anywhere. for rent place Broadband Availability in Public Spaces (27)
• Should internet access really be a priority right now?? Maybe make internet accessible in public and popular spaces, rather than all of HP. • Available in all parks
• Add free Wi-Fi to parks
• provide it to this area not just the Santa Fe and Florence area • Internet should only be provided at libraries or parks/recreational centers for students/children. Aside from those places, internet should not be provided for households
• Better internet speeds in public spaces like libraries More Community Outreach (7)
• Coming together as a community and advocating as a group. • We can better connect and find resources that are needed nearby. • With information programs where to go to acquire one or the resources that exist.
• More offline outreach to inform community that does not follow online newsletters/social media
• Promoted better. I didn't even know we had broadband internet. How do we access it?
• Provide more information to the residents by better communicating so they are aware of what is available
• Coming together as a community and advocating as a group.
Other (7)
• Do a every 6 month or yearly inspection to if it's doing good. • Protecting, personal information
• Let the government invest since today it is a necessity.
Broadband is fine (2)
• I think it’s okay
• It is fine as is.
No Support (2)
• We don't need broadband internet access. We need that money to fix Salt Lake Park.
• We don’t need to use tax dollars to pay for internet access City wide. There is no barrier to this. Everyone has cell phones, and everyone can obtain this service. Do not allocate funding.
• I don't like the idea of giving "free" internet to everyone in the City. Nothing is free. Access to broadband internet requires someone to pay for it. I don't believe that everyone should have access to the internet, especially when it can be used all day to stand around and do nothing. I like the idea of having a resource center in the City where people can access the internet to look for work. I refuse to give away my hard-earned money to fund someone else's daily entertainment.
Do Not Know (19)
• Have no idea. • NA
• I'm not aware. • Unknown
• Not sure • Not sure
• No comment • N/A
• Not sure • N/a
• Don't know • I don't know
• don't know • I don't know.
• Not sure • N/a
• N/A • I don't know
• • N/A
22. Do you feel there are places in the community that are more vulnerable to flooding or other natural disasters?
There were 181 respondents that answered no and 48 respondents who responded yes to the questions and 62 skipped.
The respondents feel that the places in the community that are more prone to flooding are old buildings and uneven ground, especially near the 710 Freeway and the area near the Los Angeles River. Streets like Pacific Blvd, Florence, Firestone, and Gage Ave often flood because of clogged drains and poor drainage systems Result:
1. Old Buildings
2. Los Angeles Rivers
3. Streets: Pacific Blvd, Florence, Firestone, and Gage Ave Among those who answered yes, the summary is below:
Other (7) Old Buildings (4)
• Areas Near 710 Freeway • Old buildings or homes
• Taller trees • Older built homes
• The park
• many areas and homes that are built
on uneven topography
• Side walks • Old buildings and schools
• People who have low
resources
• Locations near factories
with hazardous chemicals
• North of Huntington Park
• Bad irrigation systems
Los Angeles River (3)
• Near the LA River
• There is an elevated (though not immediately imminent) earthquake damage risk. Nothing too obvious due to the development of most of the three-square miles of land aside from park areas within City limits, but the City was built on riparian soils, ergo, river soils due to the history of the then-constantly changing course of and relatively short distance from the LA River, which is about a mile at closest. Soft river sedimented soils are prone to amplify shaking and areas within closer proximity to the river are more prone to liquefaction, regardless of the channeling of the river with concrete for most of its length around WW2 by the Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, the relatively flat topography allows moderate street flooding during rainstorms.
• The houses that are by the river
Streets (10)
• The corners of each street sometime pool up a lot of water. Maybe a drain there.
• The streets flood like crazy when it rains. That's everywhere. • Some of the streets are more vulnerable to flooding. I’m not sure if it’s because the drains are clogged or the way the street is leveled. • The streets easily flood during periods of heavy rain. Priority should be school areas, but many residential areas are vulnerable. • The streets. Because the sewers are clogged and that reaches some homes
• There are certain streets that flood when it rains and that cause traffic because we have to detour
• The streets. Because the sewers are clogged and that reaches some homes
• Streets
• I think that in case of flooding the City does not have the capacity in terms of water drainage. In the event of an earthquake there is no preventive culture with drills to know what to do as well as a seismic alarm.
• Areas where swears are blocked by trash.
• The corners of each street sometime pool up a lot of water. Maybe a drain there.
Specific Streets (18)
• I've lived in this City long enough to know that if a big enough storm comes through it, Pacific Blvd. and the streets immediately surrounding it will flood heavily. But that's mainly due to the residents being dirty and throwing their damn trash everywhere. Those people making a mess need to be fined heavily for doing so.
• Belgrave E/O Santa Fe
• Corner of Broadway and Pacific Blvd.
• By Slauson Ave
• On Alameda street
• Vernon, streets need to be fixed
• In certain areas like down Florence and Firestone are prone to flooding • State streets do have some flooding. If the street trash was picked up it wouldn’t clog the street drains. Once again clean our community. • La Gage floods near Seville
• Gage and Seville Ave
• Gage and Seville
• Gage Ave, right next to Monarca bakery
• Gage and Holmes. Gage and Alameda in front of the BMW lot. • On gage, Seville.
• La Gage floods near Seville
• Near Randolph and Alameda and residences along Santa Fe. • Electrical wiring is very low and feels unsafe near our areaRandolph/Corona • Randolph Street. I was unable to drive to work during a storm last year.
Not Sure (7)
• Not sure
• N/a
• Not Sure
• Not sure
• Not Sure
• Could I have done so?
• I do not know
23. If you have any additional comments, feel free to provide them in the space below. (Please Specify)
The top other issues in Huntington Park are a lack of parking, poor public infrastructure, and safety concerns. Many residents expressed concerns with overcrowded streets, illegal parking, and inadequate enforcement. Public infrastructure, like parks, the library, and roads, needs repair and they would like better community spaces. Safety is a major concern, with rising crime, car thefts, and homelessness, prompting calls for more police presence and better enforcement.
Result:
1. Parking: Lack of spaces, illegal parking, and enforcement issues.
2. Public Infrastructure: Poor condition of parks, roads, and public spaces.
3. Safety: Increased crime, car thefts, and homelessness.
The list of responses can be found below:
Parking (24)
• We urgently need spaces to park our cars More cleaning and lighting throughout the City, green areas in our schools, remove Los Holmes and Low-Cost rents • The parking enforcement needs to do their job and drive through residential streets to ticket cars that are illegally parked, aren't moved for days, or are parked in between two parking spaces. They are getting paid with our tax money so have them do their job.
• Billboard in pacific not needed. Use money elsewhere. New extended sidewalks, not good. Creating parking structures within communities as parking is a great problem.
Perhaps build more duplex homes/ apartment, rather than apartments complexes • Please address the parking pass issue. The City has spoken at the polls, and we have requested permit parking like other nearby cities. What is the hold up? Why hasn't the City addressed the issue? In addition, when residents call to ask questions of any sort, City staff become defensive, and they give the caller the run around. • Stop spending money on dumb things like that stupid giant sign on Pacific. Fix the parks, clean the streets. Stop cutting down trees and let the trees be a beauty to our City. Have people clean these nasty alleys. Place dog bags everywhere. Put more money in our police department. Keep our communities safe. • Street parking is another issue that the City needs to work on as soon as possible. • Can you do anything about street parking permits and the late party noise on weekdays, please.
• Need to implement measure PP as soon as possible. Parking is horrible in the City. • Need to enforce parking in the residential streets that are marked. • I believe our City leaders are doing a good job. Thank you. I just wish something could be done about permit street parking and noise ordinances. • Parking, parking, needed desperately.
• Parking enforcement. I am in a wheelchair and many times I have to go in the street because cars are parked blocking the sidewalk
• Parking is a big issue. Some tenants and or homeowners have too many cars that are being parked in the streets and not moved for a week.
• There are too many vehicles and tenants have no parking. There are some apartments that do not offer any vehicle parking for any tenants the streets are overcrowded with vehicles
• I would like more information regarding Measure PP which passed in March. I haven’t received any updates on when it will be implemented.
• Please help enforcing proper parking and delimited parking zone • We need parking, we need more law enforcement to move people who sleep on the sleeps of residential blocks. We need commercial business to be responsible for the sidewalks and buildings and making things nice and not full of trash. We need the sidewalk to be fixed. We need a park that is accessible, We need clean streets and sidewalks.
• Our City needs Parking Enforcement. Urgently Too many Cars Parked in the street without being moved weeklong till street sweeping. Please let’s Come up with A Parking Enforcement Program.
• Dear City of Huntington Park, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the current parking situation in our City. There seems to be an abundance of red and no parking zones, making it increasingly difficult for residents to find suitable parking spaces. Additionally, it appears that the City is profiting from the high number of parking tickets being issued. I urge the City to consider revising the current parking regulations to better accommodate residents and visitors. Finding a parking spot should not be a constant struggle, and the excessive number of restricted zones only exacerbates the issue. Thank you for your attention to this matter. • Please do something about the parking situation on my street there's no parking due to everyone parks their car outside instead of using their driveway and I have a toddler and for me to park far away and walk during midnight to get to my car is scary please do something thank you
• Parking has become increasingly worse.
• My main concern is public street parking, there is never any parking due to people owning extra leisure/recreational vehicles.
• That they will apply a penalty to people who park badly to save parking the street is free. And that neighboring cities c make responsible for their tenants or citizens who park their cars for a whole week in cities that they do not receive • Lack of parking. is Huntington Park's biggest problem.
Public Infrastructure (19)
• Can we please devote more funding/financial support to renovating the Huntington Park Library on Miles Ave. I went recently, and the AC was not working, the shelves looked empty, and it was so disheartening to see a space like that. Not sure if it’s already undergoing chances but would love to see this space revitalized. • Improve community spaces, such as parks. Specifically rebuild salt lake park playground that has been desolate for years. Support for farmers market, diversified food night markets, social media support for yard sale, community events to garner more attraction, etc.
• Fix our salt lake park.
• We need Salt Lake Park fixed. We were left without a park for more than 2yrs and now we all must drive far to get to a decent playground. Bad on you City of Huntington Park
• What happened to the pool at Salt Lake Park?
• Can you give an update about the public pool construction in Salt Lake Park. This project has been going on for years without completion and has cost the City an exorbitant amount of money.
• Please fix salt lake park and bring back the skate park. It’s needed in this community. • We need community pools and good sports programs and get rid of all the political people that control the sports programs and work in the park. Some park employees are so mean with our kids and residents that we better go to other parks, that is very disgusting.
• Put Salt Lake Park back for our children. We don’t care for the pool anymore just bring back our park, so we don’t have to look at other cities • Yes, adding more sports activities for children in parks so they can get involved in extracurricular activities so that they can stay away from bad influences that’s happening to this day and age.
• HP needs more community centers, youth centers with resources for low-income children. Education on nutrition and access to low cost/free fresh fruits and vegetables.
• Open to public community centers for community use. Tax dollars to build but taxpayers can't use.
• Fix Salt Lake Park. The City ruined the park completely. You took away an important aspect of our community and left it to deteriorate.
• Street lighting is terrible on some of the main streets like State St and Salt Lake.
There are far too many car accidents (involving pedestrians and other cars) at the crosswalk at State and Gage.
• Speed bumps needed on Randolph st between Gifford n Carmelita • Infrastructure in our community is horrible. Slauson Ave road is full of potholes and Soto Ave/ Miles Ave is the worst road with the most potholes and uneven pavement. It is time to focus on improving our roads. Even though Vernon is responsible for the roads in Soto I think it affects residents of Huntington park the most since it is the City right next to it and we should have a say on how to fix it or pressure them to accept fixing Soto. Additionally, crime and theft is rising again and we need to focus on reducing crime and gang activity.
• Spend funds on improving our existing structures and resources like the park.
Childhood obesity is a huge problem and made worse by lack of available spaces.
Stop bringing new drug assistance problems to our City and HP does not need more homeless people, homeless housing programs have proven to be a failure, don't waste our money on that
• I think that money is being wasted by adding yellow plastic to the sidewalk ramps.
They are very slippery when wet and it does not help people with wheelchairs. • Please reconsider adding actual bike lanes to the streets instead of the shared bike routes currently in place like on Miles Ave and Saturn Ave.
Public Safety (12)
• Law-enforcement in the area to address: Homeless encampment Reckless drivers City Cleanup and graffiti removal-Park and recreational crew • More police patrolling to avoid crimes at night. Weekly alley cleaning services to remove trash that is dumped by non-residents.
• We need more public safety; people are afraid to live or visit HP • There needs to be a crackdown on car thefts and homelessness. I’m a property manager on Malabar st and I have gotten homeless break into an apt go to jail then put back on the street within 24 hours. I have had more the 15 car thefts or break ins within the last 3 months. Talk to the cops about it. They pretty much said they couldn’t do anything about it.
• More safety on the streets and have roads and alleys being fixed. • One of the problems that I have is that police does not respond to calls, and when they do is usually too late.
• Gangs and more cleanup, more police surveillance
• You should see more surveillance on the streets. more in the Pacific and Vallejo where there is more vandalism. They are always painting the walls graphite. and today they do it in broad daylight
• More police security, for car thefts, and that there be a fine for those who thunder firecrackers when it is not the 4th of July.
• Focus on transport and public safety. Wi-Fi, homelessness, and housing come after.
Also stop trying to provide housing, that’s just a band aid. With housing you also need a lot of parking. Just go back to the basics for City government and do them well.
Public safety, public transportation, cleanliness, sidewalk and road maintenance. It’s not flashy but it works.
• Please begin to issue citations for people that explode fireworks near the school on Hope and State. It’s a safety issue because of the proximity to the school, homes, and cars.
• The smoke shop on Slauson/miles should be shut down. Transients loiter in the liquor area of Slauson/miles. More police visibility is needed on Slauson • Law-enforcement in the area to address: Homeless encampment, Reckless drivers City Cleanup, and graffiti removal-Park and recreational crew City Cleanliness (9)
• Too much garbage.
• The City should pick up the bulky items in the alleys and streets, without the need for people to call to make an appointment, sometimes they take a long time to come to pick up the things, and the things abandoned in the alleys, give the City a very bad look. I think the City should patrol the streets and alleys to collect all the furniture and things that are garbage. Sometimes people from the opposite direction come and leave their things on other people's property and they spend many days or weeks there, making a bad appearance. Abandoned bulky items make our City look poor and ugly
• Please clean the streets. They are dirty, investing in water pressure machine would not hurt.
• I would really like to see our community move forward with beautification and cleanliness like other communities. Gentrification would be great for Pacific Boulevard.
Our community needs to move forward with bringing new businesses and revenue.
Our community cannot move forward without a new outlook and change. It is time to revamp Huntington Park.
• Potholes on the streets should be fixed immediately
• We need the streets cleaner. More activities for seniors. More help for seniors • Our City needs to be cleaner. We need sidewalk pressure washing and picking up trash morning, mid-day and evening. Our City needs to be clean just like in the past.
We were a clean City and now. we also need to feel safer when walking. So please bring back patrols out.
• We need cleaner streets. We need a shopping center.
• The City of Huntington Park is dirty and gross. There is nothing clean anywhere.
There is trash everywhere, graffiti everywhere, human and dog feces everywhere, crime everywhere, and everything just looks, feels, and smells gross. The City is an embarrassment.
Tenant Protection (7)
• Landlords should be forced to take a class on the Renting Guidelines where they k is what they can and can’t do as owners. My landlord in particular crosses the line over and over and when told to reach out to Fair Housing Foundation to acquire the necessary information, I get yelled at and harassed. Unacceptable • I am being unjustly evicted and they can't help me until they have a 5-day note from the sheriff practically 5 days away from becoming homeless with my children and no one can help me, yet I don't have the 5-day note but I don't want to wait for that to give way and I have to go to the street with my children
• They should create laws to protect tenants, there is no law that protects us and the owners know it and that is why they abuse each tenant wanting to run them whenever they want, taking away our garages for the City wants more sad homes for us who do not have a home
• "Clear language for pets (if pets pay rent - dangerous pets pay insurance? How much should be the price to pay.
• The City must clarify that pets have a charge for living with families as mental health (there is harassment from owners) eviction for having pets • Protection of pets. I have my dog and since it is not in conflict, they will evict me • My puppy is not dangerous, I think he does not need insurance. of a dangerous animal. I want to know if my puppy will pay rent (the owner to my parents. he tells them that if they do not pay rent and insurance, he will ask us for the house where mine lived (how much do you pay rents my dog)
Economic Development (7)
• We need to rezone abandoned lots or empty businesses into mixed use housing and business. Or help give out small business loans to revitalize Pacific Blvd • Please focus on economic improvement to the shopping options in HP, specifically Pacific Blvd. change the culture to make it attractive and desirable to shop. Require standards of decorum for store fronts. Enough of the tackiness that drives people like me to leave my sales tax revenue in other cities that are cleaner and have good options. Look at examples of Old Town Pasadena, Uptown Whittier, Monrovia. Attract more mainstream markets. How does Cudahy get a Sprouts? Believe me, A LOT of residents want a Trader Joe’s. Where is our Costco? Please revitalize the City. • The Pacific Blvd Theater needs improvement so families can enjoy it, and youth can gather with friends.
• I’d love to see nighttime farmer markets and or markets where we encourage people in the community who happen to make handmade items or have small shops to come out and show us their products. I feel like we need to make the community feel safe and united by having us come out more and get to know and trust each other. • Bring some high-tech jobs to Huntington Park.
• Instead of building statues or TV screen fix the rat infestation in Pacific, I see them run around in broad daylight
• Stop funding homeless. Direct that money to education. Keep our streets clean. Don’t let RVs park along Belgrade. Provide more assistance to people that want to buy homes not just rent. Keep small businesses in HP
• The Blvd. needs to be revamped to what it was before. We should not be going out of our City to shop.
Affordable Rent (7)
• They should check the owners of houses and apartments. Because they charge too much rent. Very high rental prices plus what they ask to be able to enter one or two months of rent apart from the rent that makes it so that in order to enter you have to deposit 3 months of rent where do you get the money from? • Help with the high cost of rent not enough parking we need rent control for City Huntington many people work only to pay rent that is very expensive. 10% is a lot of money rent control pls
• Make the City of Huntington Park rent control.
• The Property taxes are too high in an area with low-income earners and 8 or more ppl in a single-family home. let’s allow ADU and monetary help without triggers reassessments. There are programs but ppl cannot pay higher property taxes • I think that the City of Huntington Park must do something to control the rent because is increasing every year.
• Please help with rent control or affordable housing
• The biggest problems I see are affordability of living space, rents out of control, and resurfacing street pavements.
Public Outreach (7)
• I know that they are working on improving but I do think that they need to support each other more with the community and get closer.
• We need to come together and advocate.
• Do y'all share this some other way too beside email? If not, y'all should outreach more. Will you also provide the results of this survey? • Would love to be more involved in these planning conversations and decision making.
The City should host more town halls and do more surveying at local community events.
• Cities lack the ability to inform their residents on City issues. The City needs to be more transparent.
• Please take the survey seriously.
• Setting up community billboards or signage such as on bus stops of street corners could help inform the public of more available assistant services and upcoming events.
Homeless (7)
• Homeless issue needs to be addressed
• The homeless issue is a local issue. Many are from the community and local housing not Skid Row
• Seems since Mayor Bass removed the homeless from LA, they moved into local areas, including HP. I see many more homeless in the area now. • Improvements to ensure we don't have homeless people or drug addicted people walking around freely. City vigilance and safety should be taken into consideration • Huntington Park should focus more on the homeless and police not responding to crimes in progress
• I would like a little more attention to be paid to the speed of the streets and that there are no homeless people in the parks
Others (6)
• It's been a while since Rosi has been using chemicals to kill weeds and spraying fruit plants like before
• I feel that the City should give classes on disasters CPR and climate crisis for free. • What is going on with the Exide battery cleanup and remediation? Why are we not getting more information?
• Any unreasonable use of taxpayer money will be met with me moving out of the City. I refuse to give my taxes to an irresponsible City government. • Grateful for the federal home repairs program & its staff. Thank you very much. • Retired adult income assistance
• Reallocate money from the Huntington park police department and move it into social programs. The City does not need military-style vehicles.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
Consolidated Plan
2025-2029
OUTREACH RESULT
City Council Consulta�on
COMMENTS FROM CONSULTATION WITH MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAYOR FLORES – May 22, 2025
• Requested reports with statistics and presentation from Inner City Visions. • I would like to see a more “hands on approach” with homelessness. • I would like statistics on where the homeless population comes from • I would like to beef up homelessness prevention such an emergency services or creating a case manager position, police team, tenant-based rental assistance, emergency rental assistance or a housing authority.
• I would like to pull out of the COG agreement and retain funding at the City level. • I would like to see a more robust campaign to conduct public outreach throughout the City. • Requested information on the number of shelter beds available in the City and how many are being used.
COUNCILMEMBER SANABRIA – May 22, 2025
• I would like to have a coordinated entry system in place for the homeless community. • I would like information on the number of VASH Vouchers in use in the City. • I would like to exclude organizations that do not have direct agreements or partnerships with homeless service providers and do not only serve Huntington Park residents, including those that do not coordinate through the coordinated entry system. • I would like to keep Measure A funding for local efforts rather than to the COG who will use it on a regional basis.
• Encourages that programs be vetted for viability before seeking funding for projects that have the potential to fail.
• Encourages limiting first time homebuyer funding when projects have already been subsidized by the City for affordable housing.
• I would like to reduce economic development programs such as the proposed Façade Improvement Program to fund Americans with Disability Act public improvements instead. • I would like to see the Façade Improvements guidelines assist only owner-occupied properties. • Requested updating the Consolidated Plan references to SPA 7 only without naming other cities. • Requested final publisher review of the Consolidated Plan before final publication and submission to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
COUNCILMEMBER MACIAS
• Requested updates on future funding of entitlement programs. • Requested that staff keep a close eye on the federal budget and the potential for any entitlements that may be on the chopping block.
• Expressed there are no issues with Inner City Visions but would like a presentation on the status of their services in the City of Huntington Park.
COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ – May 23, 2025
• I would like to see a response to the homeless crisis.
• The City focuses on responding to the homeless crisis instead of having a prevention strategy in place.
• I would like to see Measure A funds used for homeless outreach and case management. • I would like to explore creating an ad hoc committee to address the homeless crisis including determining the number of shelter beds and others service providers such as Community of Friends.
• I would like to determine if PLHA funds can be used for a homeless case manager. • We would like to have Inner City Visions present the status of their services in the City with outcome indicators and whether the funds they receive are having an impact on the homeless crisis.
• I would like to see a robust enforcement of rental units to bring them up to health and safety standards.
COUNCILMEMBER MARTIZ – May 23, 2025
• Expressed her passion for more affordable housing in the City. • Would like to see more programs available to the community that offer ownership opportunities. • I would like the CalHome Program to only be available to City of Huntington Park residents. • I would like to explore land trusts and studio apartments for the first time homebuyers or renters. • Would like for community members to be more involved and engaged in the community and its programs.
For comments or concerns, reach out to
Louis Morales
[Tel] (323) 584-6392
[Email] [email protected]
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
CONSOLIDATED PLAN
2025-2029
Responses to
Council Member Jonathan Sanabria
2 OVERVIEW:
Reference Notes: The following are the responses to the comments from the Consolidated Plan draft document submitted by Councilmember Sanabria. The comments are organized by the page number where the written comments are made, followed by the section reference from the Consolidated Plan, followed by the response to the comment.
It is important to note that the Consolidated Plan is prepared using the eCon Planning Suite which is a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program and the required template. The data tables are pre-populated by HUD data and cannot be manipulated, changed, revised or edited. The data from the 2025-2030 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Rights was used to inform the Consolidated Plan. The narratives related to the data tables are prepared by humans and tailored to describe the city’s data tables. The final Consolidated Plan will be uploaded to the Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) which has character limitations in the system. Accordingly, some narratives will need to be condensed at the time the document is uploaded to IDIS.
3 COVER PAGE COMMENTS AND MNS RESPONSES
Page: Cover Page
Section: Cover Page
Comment: “What would a count of unduplicated stakeholder look like?” • Response: The stakeholder list does not have duplications. The stakeholder list was prepared by City staff. The stakeholder list includes the Department of Housing and Urban Development required categories such as housing agencies, homeless and social services agencies. The stakeholders included the Planning Commission (John Estrada, Graciela Ortiz, and Eduardo Carvajal), the health and education commission (Liselda Fabian, Ebony Batiste, Iliana Baltazar, and Iris Delgado), and City partners (Huntington Plaza Affordable Housing, Azure Development, Century 21 Real Estate, Linc Housing, Casa Rita Affordable Housing, New Start Housing, Pipeline Health, Huntington Park Parks and Recreation, Fair Housing Foundation, Los Angeles County Library, and Inner City Visions. City Council members were engaged through the City Council public hearings held on February 18, 2025 (Mayor Macias, Vice Mayor Flores, Sanabria, Martinez) and April 21, 2025 (Mayor Flores, Vice Mayor Martinez, Sanabria, Macias) City Council meetings. Individual meetings with City Councilmembers will be held starting May 12, 2025. All comments received will be included in the final Consolidated Plan.
Page: Cover Page
Section: Cover Page
Comment: “Why didn’t we mention rent stabilization?”
• Response: The Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan focus on Department of Housing and Urban Development funded programs and activities. A rent stabilization program narrative has been added to section MA-15 of the Consolidated Plan.
Page: Cover Page
Section: Cover Page
Comment: “Is there a report for the first time homebuyer program?” “How many successful/failed applicants?” “Total amount?”
• Response: The First Time Homebuyer Program is not funded with federal funds. The program is a state funded program funded with Cal Home funds that is administered by Global Urban Strategies. City Staff Requested a report from Global Urban Strategies to address City Council feedback. This report is available as attachment A.
Page: Cover Page
Section: Cover Page
Comment: “Requires extensive citizen participation - .4%” 4 • Response: The Citizen Participation Plan for the City of Huntington Park was followed and achieved a decent response despite efforts to solicit additional participation percentage. The response rate is acceptable to HUD.
Page: Cover Page
Section: Cover Page
Comment: “How much money has been returned to the feds?” • Response: Money has not been returned to the federal government at this time.
Pursuant to the draft Repayment Agreement between the City of Huntington Park and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, $483,345.60 are required to be repaid to the CDBG funding account from a non-federal funding source or general fund dollar. Payment will be split over 3 years with a $161,116 repayment in FY 2026, and $161,115 repayment in 2027, and $161,115 and repayment in FY 2028.
Page: Cover Page
Section: Cover Page
Comment: “What is the amount for Home rehab we can apply?” “It’s interesting that we haven’t heard a mention of up to $100,000 being a threshold that’s problematic but I see here that we went from $15,000 to $100,000, yet we don’t know selection process as council not give the applications to review?
• Response: The City Council approved the original HOME funded the Minor Home Repair Program at its City Council meeting of February 21, 2023, with a total budget of $2,338,670 from 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 HOME funds. Each applicant could receive a grant in the amount of $25,000. The City Council has not approved a program for $15,000. After launching the Home Repair Program, it was discovered that every qualifying applicant’s home exceeded the grant amount based on cost increases in construction related to labor and materials. The Home Repair Program guidelines require that health and safety issues be addressed before any funds can be expended on cosmetic repairs. Examples of the issues that were discovered included, no restroom in the home, faulty electrical, illegal patio conversions, deteriorating interior bathroom walls and subflooring, roof damage, lead and asbestos present, and mold. In response to the situation, staff returned to the City Council on November 7, 2023, and presented a request to increase the program limit to $100,000 with $25,000 in the form of a grant and $75,000 in the form of a 0% deferred interest loan. The City Council approved the revised program guidelines on November 7, 2023. The selection process for the Home Repair Program is on a first come first serve basis and is described in the City Council approved Home Repair Program Guidelines and are available upon request. The program guidelines do not include City Council approval of each application. Final approvals of each application are granted by City Staff after each application is qualified for eligibility. The program is marketed to the public on the City’s website. 5 ES-05: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - 24 CFR 91.200(C), 91.220(B) Page: 6
Section: Community Needs Survey
Comment: “How many unduplicated?”
• Response: Duplicated entries were minimized by turning off multiple survey responses for a single device. A total of 291 unduplicated responses were received for input in the Con Plan. (pg. 10)
Page: 7
Section: Stakeholder Focus Groups
Comment: “How were people identified to attend?”
• Response: City staff developed the stakeholder list. Additionally, staff did outreach to City program participants and the public at multiple city events. Meetings related to the preparation of the Consolidated Plan were noticed in the newspaper in English and Spanish for multiple meetings that were held during the process. (pg.11) PR-10: CONSULTATION – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(B), 91.300(B), 91.215(I) AND 91.315(I) Page: 11
Section: Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless person (particularly chronic homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
Comment: “Active how?”
• Response: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) is the lead agency and conducts the annual Point In Time count for Los Angeles County. City staff regularly participate in the SPA 7 Homeless Coalition monthly meetings. (pg. 17) Page: 13
Section: Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated Comment: “Who?”
• Response: During the first Consolidated Plan Public Hearing held on February 18, 2025, a PowerPoint presentation was delivered before City Council members which included Mayor Karina Macias, Vice Mayor Arturo Flores, and Council Members Eduardo “Eddie” Martinez and Jonathan A. Sanabria. No comments were received at this Public Hearing from the City Council. (pg. 18)
Page: 14
Section: Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 6 Comment: “Azure years of experience?
• Response: Azure was included in the stakeholder list provided by City staff. The President of Azure Development has over 20 years of development experience. (Pg. 19) Page: 16
Section: Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan
Comment: “Who in LA?”
• Response: The implementation of the current Con Plan included coordination with other public entities including the State through other grants received including CalHome and PLHA programs. (pg. 23)
PR-15: CITIZEN PARTICIPATION – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(C) AND 91.300(C) Page: 18
Section: Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach
Comment: “291 out of 35k?”
• Response: The survey was open for a period of 30 days and was promoted on the City’s website in addition to the local Farmer’s Market, Halloween events, social media, and distributed to City partner agencies. (pg.24)
NA-05 OVERVIEW
Page: 22
Section: Demographic Trends
Comment: “Went down? Shows up!”
• Response: Section was updated and according to the Decennial Census, there was a decrease in the City’s population from 58,114 in 2010 to 54,883 in 2020. (pg.31) Page: 22
Section: Homelessness
Comment: “Historical? Are we doing better?”
• Response: SPA 7 experienced an increase in homelessness between 2020 and 2024 from 4,586 to 5,899, while the City of Huntington Park saw a decrease. The City data shows that there were 282 homeless people in 2020 and 136 in 2024. (pg.32) Page: 22
Section: Homelessness
Comment: “What shelter?”
7 • Response: There is currently no shelter in the City of Huntington Park, however the City has a contractual partnership with the Salvation Army Bell Shelter. The City also partners with Inner City Visions for homeless services, including those fleeing domestic violence and sex trafficking case management and shelter referrals.
ICV does not have official partnerships with specific agencies, however, through consistent effort and open communication, they have established ongoing working relationships with multiple shelters, rehabilitation facilities, and faith-based organizations provided the client is willing to engage with these services. (pg. 31)
SHELTERS
1. Salvation Army Bell Shelter
2. Union Rescue Mission
3. Los Angeles Mission
4. Long Beach Rescue Mission
5. The Whole Child
6. The Weingart
REHABILITATIONS
1.Tarzana Treatment Center
2. LA CADA
3. Cleveland Treatment Center
4. SCADP Treatment Center
5. An assortment of Faith based facilities throughout the county NA-10: HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT - 24 CFR 91.205 (A,B,C) Page: 24
Section: Table 7 – Housing Problems
Comment: “Household numbers seem low”
• Response: The total number of households in the City was 14,620 in 2020. The data from the Housing Problems table was pre-populated from HUD’s database and cannot be manipulated. The table represents countywide data. A narrative has been added to the Consolidated Plan description. (pg. 34)
Page: 27
Section: Table 10 – Cost Burden > 50%
Comment: “Legend with definitions missing”
• Response: Legends/definitions were added where missing in the Con Plan. (pg.36) 8 Page: 28
Section: Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking Comment: “1/5?”
• Response: The number and percentages of people affected by various disabilities have been updated. In the City of Huntington Park, hearing disability affects 759 people (1.3%) of the population, vision disability affects 785 people (1.4%), cognitive disabilities affect 1,700 people (3.2%), ambulatory disabilities such as difficulty walking or climbing stairs affect 2,672 people (5.0%), self-care disability affect 1,587 people (3.0%), and independent living disability affect 2207 (5.3%). (pg. 38) Page: 29
Section: Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking Comment: “We have our own PD, couldn’t we have a pseudo replacement for this data?” • Response: The local police department has been contacted regarding crime statistics.
The number of cases involving domestic violence was added to this section. The police report is provided below as attachment B. (pg. 38)
Page: 29
Section: Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking Comment: “Why include County?”
• Response: County data was kept as a point of reference due to underreporting and other mitigating factors. County data is acceptable to HUD where there are no local statistics. (pg. 38)
Page: 30
Section: Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? Comment: “Those with greater than 50% AMI, have same issues as those in the 30-50% AMI have same issue?”
• Response: This section was updated and people who are extremely low (0-30%AMI) and very low income (30%-50%) are most likely to be affected by housing problems. (pg.40) Page: 31
Section: Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance. 9 Comment: “How many receive TLS?”
• Response: The City does not operate shelters. The City also does not receive federal funds to address homelessness, therefore this data is not available. (pg.40) Page: 31
Section: Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and increased risk of homelessness
Comment: “What percentage?”
• Response: There are 7,142 households in the city making up 49% of the 14,620 total households who pay- more than 30% of their income from housing. (pg.41) Page: 31
Section: Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and increased risk of homelessness
Comment: “How many?”
• Response: According to the 2024 PIT, all the 136 homeless people were unsheltered in the City. While no emergency shelters are in Huntington Park, a 450-bed regional shelter is in the adjacent City of Bell. The City partners with Inner City Visions to provide homeless services and shelter referrals. According to the FY 24-25 quarter 2 report, Inner City Visions had success in assisting 116 homeless people and placed 16 individuals into shelters. (pg.41)
NA-15 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED: HOUSING PROBLEMS – 91.205 (B)(2) Page: 32
Section: Introduction
Comment: “Households?”
• Response: The section has been updated to reflect household data. (pg. 42) NA-20 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED: SEVERE HOUSING PROBLEMS – 91.205 (B)(2) Page: 42
Section: 0%-30% AMI
Comment: “?”
• Response: This section has been updated to reflect data by households. The severe housing problem rate is 32% amongst White household with 40 out of 125 White households in the 0-30% AMI. (pg. 56)
NA-25 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED: HOUSING COST BURDENS – 91.205 (B)(2) 10 Page: 44
Section: Introduction
Comment: “CHAS = Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy” • Response: The data source is included in the legend. (pg.60) Page: 45
Section: Breakdown by race
Comment: “1/4?”
• Response: This section has been updated to reflect data by households. The rate of households in the City who experience a housing burden of more than 30% is 7,220 (49%) of 14,625 total. The largest population group is Hispanic and 6,925 (49%) out of 14,045 households have housing burden of more than 30%. (pg.63) NA-35: PUBLIC HOUSING – 91.205(B)
Page: 47
Section: Introduction
Comment: “Double check nowhere on the site – not the name!” • Response: The Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) administers the Housing Choice Voucher program. The City of Huntington Park currently has 476 participants. (pg.66)
Page: 48
Section: Overview
Comment: “This is countywide – needs to be reframed”
• Response: The PIC (PIH information Center) data was prepopulated from HUD and cannot be manipulated. A description has been added to the narrative to indicate the data is countywide. (pg.66)
Page: 51
Section: Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher holders
Comment: “more units”
• Response: The City of Huntington Park does not administer the HCV program or have public housing. However, HOME funds will be used to develop approximately 10 additional affordable housing units over the next five years. (pg.70) NA-45 NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT - 91.205 (B,D) Page: 56
11 Section: Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community:
Comment: “supposed to be non-homeless”
• Response: The two special needs population in the City that are non-homeless are seniors and people with disabilities. (pg.74)
Page: 56
Section: Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area Comment: “Not SPA 7”
• Response: According to the 2022 Los Angeles County HIV Annual Surveillance Report, there are 4,010 individuals living with HIV in SPA 7 with 55 reported deaths. Huntington Park is part of LAHSA SPA 7. The specific number of people with HIV in Huntington Park was not listed in the report. (pg.76)
NA-50 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS – 91.215 (F) Page: 58
Section: Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities Comment: “How much is usable?”
• Response: The skate park at Salt Lake Park was closed due to planned construction of the Salt Lake Aquatic Center. The City is considering next steps to upgrade the Salk Lake Park recreation building. The new recreation building will include energy efficient amenities.
The Los Angeles Countywide Comprehensive Park and Recreation Needs Assessment from 2016 lists the conditions of each of the City’s park amenities. The amenities quantities and condition section of the report states that the following amenities at Salt Lake park are in poor condition and require funding to improve fitness zones, skate parks, picnic shelters, playgrounds, community centers, and restrooms. (pg.78) Page: 59
Section: Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services Comment: “Engagement?”
• Response: The narratives have been revised from “services” to “programs.” Residents have reached out to find out about community development programs through social media, websites, and brochures that were circulated. (pg.80) MA-05 OVERVIEW
Page: 60
12 Section: Overview
Comment: “How did we lose units?”
• Response: This section has been updated. In 2020 the City had about 14, 977 housing units available. This number increased to 15,133 in 2022. (pg.82) Page: 60
Section: Housing Market Analysis Overview
Comment: “Year missing for Mosaic Gardens development”
• Response: The property was acquired in 2012 with various funding sources. Later, a 55- room motel was converted into 24 apartments known as the Mosaic Gardens at Huntington Park. Apartments serve as a home for limited–income families and transition-age youth ages 18-24 receiving services from the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (LACDMH). (pg.82)
Page: 60
Section: Housing Market Analysis Overview
Comment: “Year missing for Concord Huntington Park Renovations” • Response: Concord Huntington Park features 162 affordable units for seniors, acquired in late 2022 by Redwood Housing for major renovations and sustainability initiatives.
These apartments are supported by a project-based Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract that covers 95% of the apartments. (pg.82) MA-10 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS – 91.210(A)&(B)(2)
Page: 61
Section: Introduction
Comment: “Larger units”
• Response: Larger units are defined as projects with 3 or more bedrooms. (pg.83) Page: 63
Section: Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts Comment: “Who bought it?”
• Response: Concord Huntington Park features 162 affordable units for seniors which acquired in late 2022 by Redwood Housing for major renovations and sustainability initiatives. These apartments are supported by a project-based Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract that covers 95% of the apartments. (pg.84) 13 MA-15 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: COST OF HOUSING - 91.210(A) Page: 66
Section: Table 29 – Rent Paid
Comment: “This is so outdated. LA County 2,400”
• Response: This table was prepopulated by HUD and cannot be manipulated. 2016-2020 ACS Data was used throughout the document as required by HUD. (pg.89) Page: 68
Section: How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents
Comment: “Average”
• Response: The word “average” was removed, and the narrative was reworded. (pg.92) MA-20 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: CONDITION OF HOUSING – 91.210(A) Page: 72
Section: Condition of Units
Comment: “50% deal w/ one major issue”
• Response: The data was prepopulated HUD and cannot be manipulated. (pg.93) MA-25 PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING – 91.210(B)
Page: 75
Section: Describe the supply of public housing developments Comment: “This means next sections should be for City as well” • Response: This section is not applicable to the City since it does not own or operate public housing. The data table was prepopulated by HUD and reflects countywide data. (pg.97)
Page: 76
Section: Describe the supply of public housing developments Comment: “County not our City!”
• Response: This section is not applicable to the City since the City does not own or operate public housing. The data table was prepopulated by HUD and reflects countywide data. (pg.97)
Page: 76
14 Section: Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan Comment: “Not our jurisdiction”
• Response: This section is not applicable to the City since it does not own or operate public housing. The data table was prepopulated by HUD and reflects countywide data. (pg.97)
MA-30 HOMELESS FACILITIES AND SERVICES – 91.210(C)
Page: 77
Section: Discussion
Comment: “This section disproves HaCola”
• Response: This section has been updated. Homeless facilities and services include various forms of shelter. This section highlights and lists these shelters within the city.
Homelessness comes in an array of ways and happens for many reasons, therefore, the types of programs available need to be multifaceted. Emergency shelters are usually one-night stays, and depending on the shelter, they may only accept men, women, or families. Transitional housing programs are temporary with some form of supportive service. Transitional housing with supportive services usually offers services that homeless individuals and families can benefit from, such as case management, job training, employment services, legal assistance, childcare, and housing navigation.
Permanent supportive housing provides long-term rental accommodation. Supportive services for permanent housing can look like case management, specifically for vulnerable populations such as homeless veterans, individuals living with a disability, seniors, etc. Supportive services can also look like healthcare coordination, educational support, mental health services, transportation services, and financial counselling, amongst other services. Permanent housing is available for rentals for families, often without supportive services. The City is a part of Los Angeles County and Service Planning Area (SPA) 7, the most recent PIT count shows 79 homeless people who were all unsheltered. As reported by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), the 2023 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) for Service Planning Area (SPA) 7 (https://www.lahsa.org/documents?id=7698-2023-housing-inventory-count):
• The total number of beds available is 3,893 beds, which includes emergency shelter, transitional housing, safe haven, permanent supportive housing, other permanent housing, and rapid re-housing. The total number of shelter facilities available is 2,765, which includes emergency shelter, transitional housing, safe haven, permanent supportive housing, other permanent housing, and rapid re-housing. • Breakdown by Housing Type:
• Emergency Shelter: 1,413
15 • Beds: 3,893 beds offering immediate, short-term accommodation for those in crisis.
• Transitional Housing:
• Beds: 320 beds providing temporary residence while individuals work towards permanent housing solutions.
• Permanent Supportive Housing:
• Beds: 1,281 beds offering long-term accommodation coupled with supportive services to assist individuals in maintaining stable housing. (pg.99) Page: 79
Section: Introduction
Comment: “That’s Independent Housing & Public Housing”
• Response: The narrative in this section has been revised as described in the previous comment. (pg.99)
Page: 82
Section: Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons
Comment: “$2.7 million + 5.7 = 8.4 million – 500k”
• Response: The narrative in this section has been revised. Further clarification is needed for the dollar figures listed in this comment. (pg.102) Page: 82
Section: Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons
Comment: “Altamed?”
• Response: Altamed and its services have been added to the narrative for this section in the Con Plan. (pg.103)
Page: 83
Section: City Initiatives
Comment “That’s it?”
• Response: Transitional housing programs are temporary with some form of supportive service. Transitional housing with supportive services usually offers services that homeless individuals and families can benefit from, such as case management, job training, employment services, legal assistance, childcare, and housing navigation.
Permanent supportive housing provides long-term rental accommodation. Supportive services for permanent housing can look like case management, specifically for vulnerable 16 populations such as homeless veterans, individuals living with a disability, seniors, etc.
Supportive services can also look like healthcare coordination, educational support, mental health services, transportation services, and financial counselling, amongst other services. Permanent housing is available for rentals for families, often without supportive services. The City is a part of Los Angeles County and Service Planning Area (SPA) 7, the 2024 PIT count shows 136 homeless people who were all unsheltered. (pg.103) Page: 83
Section: Emergency Shelters
Comment: “Why isn’t Bell Shelter here when we pay for beds?” • Response: The Bell Shelter is included as Bell Shelter -Salvation Army- located at 5600 Rickenbacker Road Bell, CA 90201, about 2.7 miles outside of Huntington Park. This shelter is one of the largest homeless shelters in the nation, offering various transitional care and supportive services to homeless men and women. (pg.102) MA-35 SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES AND SERVICES – 91.210(D) Page: 85
Section: Introduction
Comment: “65+ only make up 13% of the population?”
• Response: This section has been updated to include that according to ACS data, 8,306 residents are over the age of 65. (pg.105)
Page: 85
Section: Introduction
Comment: “Why isn’t our plan a multi-disciplinary one?” • Response: The Con Plan is a strategic plan that addresses how the City intends to spend the federal funding it receives from HUD. The Con Plan is unable to address the multidisciplinary needs of the community given the limited federal funding, specifically the CDBG program which has a public services cap of fifteen percent that limits the funding further to public service agencies. The City is actively looking for HOME program opportunities for affordable housing investment. (pg.105) Page: 88
Section: Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing Comment: “Why so far?”
17 • Response: The City currently doesn’t have programs that specifically assist people returning from mental and physical health institutions; in turn, housing and supportive service agencies in the surrounding area help to qualify and assist low- and moderateincome residents and special needs residents to provide any services they may need.
According to the Housing element, there are two supportive or transitional housing developments specifically for those living with disabilities, but these developments do not ensure that people returning from mental and physical health institutions are prioritized:
Mosaic Gardens at Huntington Park has a total of 24 beds, and Tiki Gardens is a transitional housing project with 35 units for homeless people. (pg.106) Page: 88
Section: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e)
Comment: “?”
• Response: The City plans to fund the Senior Program to provide services to seniors aged 55+ with educational workshops and coordinated physical activities and other recreationbased activities. In the past the City utilized its CDBG funds for ADA upgrades to its sidewalk and pedestrian ramps in various City streets. In the next 5-year consolidated plan period, the City will use its CDBG funds to support ADA upgrades and improvements to public facilities / infrastructure as needed. The City will also find opportunities to invest its HOME funds towards building more affordable housing for these special needs’ population. (pg. 106)
Page: 89
Section: For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive service needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals.
Comment “Why only these three?”
Response: The City, as a community, plans to undertake the following activities to address the housing and service needs of its special needs’ population o Providing Needed Community Services to LMI Persons
o Planning and Community Development Initiatives
o Supporting Agencies that Assist Special Needs Populations o The City will allocate CDBG public service funding to assist special needs populations and provide essential services. (pg.106)
18 o The Huntington Park Senior Program offers a wide variety of classes, drop-in activities, excursions, and services to the senior community of 62 years and older.
o The City also collaborates with local nonprofit organizations to provide resources and services to special needs groups. Programs include affordable housing development, case management, and support services.
o The City will use HOME funds to support affordable housing initiatives.
MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) Page: 96
Section: Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community Comment: “Again workforce training seems redundant”
• Response: Workforce training through programs helps build confidence, communication, and real-life job skills that are important across all areas of the workforce. Additionally, the arts, entertainment, and accommodation sector represent 10.15% of local jobs, these jobs need workers trained in tourism, guest services, and art enhancement programs.
Transportation is also a big issue. A lot of workers have long commutes, 15% drive more than an hour to their jobs, and 19% spend 30-59 minutes getting to work. This makes it clear how important it is to invest in transportation including buses, trains, and better roads. Similarly, having space available for commercial use is essential to growing economies. In conclusion, the City’s economic future depends on continued investment, and meeting these needs will help businesses grow, reduce barriers for workers, and support economic growth. (pg.113)
Page: 97
Section: Describe any major changes that may have had an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
Comment: “What is the likelihood of this coming to HP?” • Response: This section has been updated to include initiatives that may affect job and business growth opportunities during the next planning period, including a new Metro rail line that will connect Southeast LA County to downtown Los Angeles. The route includes two light rail stops to Huntington Park at Randolph Street and Pacific Boulevard and Florence and Salt Lake Avenues. Business support will be needed to assist businesses impacted during the construction period of the Metro line project. (pg.113) Page: 97
19 Section: Describe any major changes that may have had an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
Comment: "Retention?”
• Response: This section has been revised in the Consolidated Plan to reflect City initiatives including the Façade Improvement Program, the Metro line and HUB Cities. (pg.113)
Comment: ‘’Digital connectivity”
• Response: Digital connectivity is addressed in Section MA-60 Broadband. However, this section has been revised to include the City’s economic development initiatives. (pg.113)
Page: 102
Section: Discussion
Comment: “Specifics?”
• Response: This section has been revised. Additional information related to HUB Cities can be found in the previous section of the Con Plan. (pg.114) MA-60 BROADBAND NEEDS OF HOUSING OCCUPIED BY LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS - 91.210(A)(4), 91.310(A)(2)
Page: 106
Section: Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband internet service provider serve the jurisdiction
Comment: “Do they actually overlap – holes for holes?”
• Response: This section has been revised. The broadband internet service providers may overlap. The City does, however, have various internet options, including AT&T, Spectrum, EarthLink, Verizon, T-Mobile 5G, HughesNet, and Viasat. Service and pricing aren’t the same in every area. For example, AT&T’s fiber only covers about 36% of the City. Spectrum reaches around 53%. Satellite covers more ground, but it can be slow. To address the needs of residents for broadband, the City funded the Wi-Fi project to provide free internet access for all residents. Out of the 221 respondents to the community needs survey, 143 (65%) of the respondents indicated the City does not lack internet access. (pg.118)
SP-30 INFLUENCE OF MARKET CONDITIONS – 91.215 (B)
20 Page: 117
Section: Influence of Market Condition
Comment: “When do waitlists open?”
• Response: This section has been revised. The City does not operate a TBRA program.
HCV vouchers are distributed by LACDA. LACDA administers their own waiting list. (pg.131)
Page: 117
Section: Influence of Market Condition
Comment: “LACDA not HACoLA”
• Response: This section has been revised to remove HACola references. The City does not operate a TBRA program. HCV vouchers are distributed by LACDA. (pg.131) Comment: “over 450 active section 8 leases!?”
• Response: The City does not operate a TBRA program. HCV vouchers are distributed by LACDA. The data provided by LACDA indicates that there are currently 476 Housing Choice Voucher participants in the City of Huntington Park. (pg.131) Page: 118
Section: Table 48 - Influence of Market Condition
Comment: “Why are there reductions to HOME entitlements?” • Response: Every entitlement jurisdiction should generally expect an approximate 5% reduction in both CDBG and HOME funds each year as more jurisdictions are added as entitlement jurisdictions once their population exceeds 50,000. (pg.131) SP-40 INSTITUTIONAL DELIVERY STRUCTURE – 91.215(K)
Page: 121
Section: Assessment of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Comment: Who sees reports?
• Response: The Home unit monitoring reports for FY 24-25 will be kept electronically and in the form of physical files. These reports will be available upon HUD, auditor and public records act requests. The files are considered sensitive in nature as they contain personal identifiable information which would need to be redacted under a public records request. (pg.136)
SP-45 GOALS SUMMARY – 91.215(A)(4)
Page: 125
Section: Table 52 – Goals Summary
21 Comment: What amounts?
• Response: This section was updated to reflect the correct allocation amount announced by HUD. (pg.140)
Page: 126
Section: Goal Descriptions
Comment: “Rent stabilization”
• Response: This section has been revised to add a narrative related to the Rent Stabilization Program. The Fair Housing Foundation will assist callers to provide support in navigating the Huntington Park rent stabilization ordinance. (pg.142) Page: 126
Section: Goal Descriptions
Comment: “?”
• Response: HUD requires 1 Full Time Equivalent low- and moderate-income job created or retained per $35,000 in assistance to a business. (pg.142) SP-55 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING – 91.215(H)
Page: 129
Section: Barriers to Affordable Housing
Comment: “Comma”
• Response: This section was updated. (pg.145)
SP-60 HOMELESSNESS STRATEGY – 91.215(D)
Page: 131
Section: Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
Comment: “We have veteran specific units!”
• Response: According to the information provided by LACDA, the housing vouchers are general HCV vouchers and are not specific to veteran housing. (pg.147) Page: 131
Section: Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
Comment: “Why can’t we”
• Response: The City does not receive homeless specific funds from HUD and relies on City partners for homeless outreach. (pg.147)
Page: 132
22 Section: Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Comment: “Why are we sending people away?”
• Response: The City currently does not own or operate homeless shelters in the City.
However, the City is undertaking efforts to utilize its PLHA and HOME ARP funds to address homeless housing needs. (pg.147)
Page: 133
Section: Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education or youth needs
Comment: “How? ”
• Response: This section has been revised. Housing cost burden (paying more than 30% of income on housing) increases the risk of homelessness as households are forced to prioritize housing over other bills and necessities, creating financial instability.
Furthermore, these households often live paycheck to paycheck, and something as simple as one unexpected expense or medical bill can cause severe financial burden, making it difficult to make rent payments. (pg.149)
SP-70 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY – 91.215(J)
Page: 136
Section: How are the jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan
• Comment: “Not a name!”
• Response: This section was revised to include the Los Angeles County Housing Authority (LACDA). (pg.152)
AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES – 91.220(C)(1,2)
Page: 141
Section: If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan Comment: “How so?”
• Response: Huntington Park does not currently own any land or property that could be used to address the needs identified in this plan, however, the City plans to pursue PLHA and HOME-ARP in addition to HOME funds that can be used to acquire property to provide affordable housing to eligible residents. This information has been added to the narrative. (pg.159)
23 Page: 143
Section: Table 54 – Goals Summary
Comment: “Edit”
• Response: “Homeless” was removed from this part of the table. (pg.162) Page: 143
Section: Table 54 – Goals Summary
Comment: “What does assisted mean?”
• Response:” Persons assisted” refers to the estimated number of individuals who are expected to benefit from the services provided through this goal. (pg.162) AP-60 PUBLIC HOUSING – 91.220(H)
Page: 153
Section: Introduction
Comment: “In page 117 it says only 450 HCV”
• Response: This section has been updated to reflect the current number of participants in the LACDA Housing Choice Voucher Program which includes a total of 476. (pg.176) AP-65 HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES – 91.220(I) Page: 157
Section: Helping homeless persons (especially chronic homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth).
Comment: “What is chronically homeless?”
• Response: This section has been updated. The City works with local social service providers to help people experiencing homelessness, including those with special needs. While the city does not run its own shelters or programs, partnerships connect people to the services they need. In 2022, SPA 7 reported 4,781 homeless people, that number increased to 6,511 in 2024, a 36% jump. For the City specifically, a total of 86 homeless people were counted, which decreased to 79 homeless people in 2023, resulting in an 8% decrease. This data shows a regional increase in homelessness but a local decrease. The 2023 PIT data show 79 homeless people who were all unsheltered.
Data available for SPA 7, which includes the city, reveals 6,551 homeless people. Out of the total, there were 2,882 who are chronically homeless, which accounts for 44% of the total population. Only 325 of them are sheltered, and 2,557 remain unsheltered.
Individual households not in family units make up most of the homeless population at 5,482 (94%) of 5,806 total households. Most of the households are unsheltered at 4,588 24 (84%) and only 894 (16.3%) are sheltered. Out of those who are unsheltered, 4,086 are adults 25+, and 502 are between the ages of 18-24. Of those sheltered, 766 are adults 25+, 126 are between 18-24, and 2 are under 18. The 2 unaccompanied minors under the age of 18 were both sheltered. There are a total of 324 family households with at least 1 child under the age of 18. Out of these family households, 217 of them are headed by an adult and 107 are headed by a transitional age youth. Other subpopulations of the homeless population in SPA 7 are veterans and unaccompanied youth. Veterans consist of 5% of the total population, 295 and 294 are individual households, and 1 is a family household. The City's homeless population fluctuates throughout the year. Homeless populations are currently declining in the City. City efforts focus on partnerships and expanding housing opportunities. (pg.179)
AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS – 91.220(K)
Page: 162
Section: Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing Comment: Why?
• Response: Service providers can apply for Public Service funding through the annual request for proposals process from December through January each year. (pg.182) Page: 163
Section: Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families Comment: “HOME is mentioned constantly, how much?”
• Response: The only active first-time home buyer program is available through Cal Home Funding. The maximum Cal Home loan amount is 40 percent of the Borrower’s purchase price for the property, or up to a maximum of $200,000 and the purchase price may not exceed $650,000. The Cal Home Program is not a federally funded program, it is a state funded program. (pg.183)
25 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MEETING
Page: 2
Section: Phase 1: Community Meeting Overview
Comment: “Wednesday at 10am?”
• Response: HUD recommends two different time periods in the day to capture residents with various availability. (pg.2)
Page: 2
Section: Phase 1: Community Meeting Overview
Comment: “What is our engagement like?”
• Response: Phase 1 meeting included 13 Spanish attendees on November 12, 2024, and 10 English attendees on November 13, 2024. Phase 2 meeting included 8 Spanish attendees on Jan 14, 2025, and 14 English attendees on Jan 16, 2025. The Citizen Participation Plan for the City of Huntington Park was followed and achieved a decent response despite efforts to solicit additional participation percentage. (pg.2) Page: 3
Section: Public Services: Do you believe these programs or services are meeting the community’s needs?
Comment: “How do we know this number?”
• Response: All subrecipients of HUD funds are required to submit quarterly reports highlighting their accomplishments to the City. Accomplishments must be entered into the Integrated Disbursement and Information System to allow the City to draw down federal funds that have been expended. (pg.3)
Page: 4
Section: Live Feedback Session
Comment: “Because they wanted one?”
• Response: During the community engagement meeting, residents wanted to find out about the availability of a homeless shelter in the City. City staff responded that the City does not have homeless shelter. The residents did not specify if they wanted a homeless shelter. (pg.4)
Page: 5
Section: Summary
Comment: “So no?”
• Response: The residents would like to see more focus on job creation and support for small businesses. The City is still in the process of developing its new Façade 26 Improvement Program (FIP). The FIP will provide grants to businesses along Pacific Blvd to improve their storefront with the requirement for low/mod income job creation or retention. The FIP has not been officially launched, as such no business has been assisted to date. (pg.5)
Page: 5
Section: Summary
Comment: “Did we ask small business owners”
• Response: The meeting was made available for all members of the public, including business owners. (pg.5)
Page: 6
Section: Community Meeting Flyer
Comment: “???”
• Response: Informational flyers were available to the public related to the development of the AI and the Con Plan. There were two meeting options for Spanish and English at two different times and locations to capture feedback from the community. (pg.6) Page: 14
Section: Phase 2 Meeting
Comment: Farmers Market
• Response: The survey was carried out at the City’s Farmers Market that took place weekly on Wednesdays. (pg.14)
STAKEHOLDER MEETING
Page: 20
Section: Housing: Do you think the City’s current approach to affordable housing is meeting the community’s needs?
Comment: “How!!!”
• Response: Amada home is an affordable housing project that will create nine (9) town homes to meet the needs of working families making at or below 80% of the Area Median Income. (pg.20)
Page: N/A
Section: Question 7: What are the City’s Priority Needs for CDBG and HOME funds over the next five years?
Comment: “Why didn’t we ask PATH, HYE, or SA (Salvation Army)?” Response: The responses were based on stakeholder participation and responses during the virtual meetings. The Salvation Army was invited but did not attend any meetings or participate in any other form. (pg.32)
27 Attachment A
Cal Home First Time Homebuyer Report
Huntington Park CalHome Grant
General Report: Updated 05/28/25
28 Attachment B
Huntington Park Police Crime Statistics
Part One Crimes July 1, 2024 - April 30, 2025
Homicide 1
Rape 12
Robbery 129
Aggravated Assault 94
Residential Burglary 46
Commercial Burglary 63
Larceny 693
Vehicle Burglary 218
Motor Vehicle Theft 410
Arson 12
Felony 431
Misdemeanor 644
Adult 1028
Juvenile 47
Total Arrest 1075
DUI Arrests 101
HUNTINGTON PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
6542 Miles Avenue, Huntington Park, CA 90255 (323) 826-6611 7 (323) 584-1137 www.hppolice.org
Arrests
This space for filing stamp only
OR#:
O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State of California )
County of Orange ) ss
Notice Type:
Ad Description:
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Los Angeles, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature
HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN
1007 N SEPULVEDA BLVD STE 1357, MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 (323) 556-5720 (213) 835-0584
PRE 3902157
EDUARDO SARMIENTO
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK/CITY CLERK (LEAD)
6550 MILES ROOM 148
HUNTINGTON PARK, CA - 90255
HRG - NOTICE OF HEARING
Consolidated Plan 2025-2029 and Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Action Plan
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of HUNTINGTON PARK, county of LOS ANGELES, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of LOS ANGELES, State of California, under date 06/14/1943, Case No. 485073. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
03/06/2025
03/06/2025
LOS ANGELES
!A000007042541!
Email
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY AND PUBLIC
HEARING FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2025-2029 AND
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 ANNUAL ACTION
PLAN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance
with the federal regulations at 24 CFR, Part 91,
the City of Huntington Park has prepared a FiveYear Consolidated Plan for Community Planning and Development Programs 2025-2029 and the
Action Plan for FY 2025-2026. These documents
are a requirement for direct assistance under
certain Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) funding programs including
the Community Development Block Grant
Program (CDBG) and HOME Program.
A public hearing on the draft Five-Year
Consolidated Plan 2025-2029 and Annual Action
Plan will be held to receive citizen input as
follows:
Public Hearing Details: Date and Time: Monday,
April 21, 2025, and 6:00 p.m. Location:
Huntington Park Council Chambers, 6550 Miles
Avenue, Huntington Park, CA 90255
A copy of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan and
FY 2025/2026 Annual Action Plan is available for
public inspection and review from March 6, 2025,
to April 7, 2025, at the following locations: City
Hall, City Clerk and Community Development
Department at 6550 Miles Ave, Huntington Park
Library at 6518 Miles Ave, and Salt Lake Park at
3401 E. Florence, Huntington Park, CA.
The Consolidated Plan provides the goals and
objectives that the City hopes to accomplish
using the CDBG and HOME funds over the next
five years. The 2025/2026 Annual Action Plan
specifies available resources to meet the
identified needs. The activities expected to be
covered are as follows: Senior Program, After
School Program, Façade Improvement Program,
Fair Housing Program, and CDBG Administration.
The City intends to submit the Housing and
Community Development Plan to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) on or before May 31, 2025. Interested
persons are encouraged to express their views
on the Consolidated Plan and the Annual Action
Plan for FY 2025/26 via email by sending
comments to Ishah Ahumada at
[email protected] or in writing to the
Community Development Department, 6550
Miles Avenue, Huntington Park, CA 90255,
attention: Ishah Ahumada, Housing Manager. All
comments received by April 7, 2025, by 5:00 p.m.
will be considered.
It is the City's goal to comply with Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by,
the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990
and the ADA Amendment Act of 2008, the Fair
Housing Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act in
all respects. For this reason, special
accommodations for disabilities and/or language
barriers are available, including translation
services for Spanish, as required by the City's
Citizen Participation Plan.
Any requests for special accommodations may be
directed to Ishah Ahumada, at (323) 584-6290 or
via email at [email protected]. Requests for
accommodation should be made at least 48
hours prior to the meeting to allow sufficient time
for City staff to arrange reasonable services
during the hearing.
3/6/25
PRE-3902157#
HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN
ATTACHMENT "B"
This space for filing stamp only
OR#:
O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State of California )
County of Orange ) ss
Notice Type:
Ad Description:
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Los Angeles, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature
HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN
1007 N SEPULVEDA BLVD STE 1357, MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 (323) 556-5720 (213) 835-0584
PRE 3902158
EDUARDO SARMIENTO
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK/CITY CLERK (LEAD)
6550 MILES ROOM 148
HUNTINGTON PARK, CA - 90255
HRG - NOTICE OF HEARING
SPANISH - Consolidated Plan 2025-2029 and Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Action Plan
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of HUNTINGTON PARK, county of LOS ANGELES, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of LOS ANGELES, State of California, under date 06/14/1943, Case No. 485073. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
03/06/2025
03/06/2025
LOS ANGELES
!A000007042543!
Email
CIUDAD DE HUNTINGTON PARK
AVISO DE DISPONIBILIDAD Y AUDIENCIA
PÚBLICA PARA EL
PLAN DE ACCIÓN CONSOLIDADO 2025-2029
Y PLAN DE ACCIÓN ANUAL PARA EL AÑO
FISCAL 2025-2026
POR LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que, de
acuerdo con las regulaciones federales en 24
CFR, Parte 91, la Ciudad de Huntington Park ha
preparado un Plan Consolidado de Cinco Años
para Programas de Planificación y Desarrollo
Comunitario 2025-2029 y el Plan de Acción para
el Año Fiscal 2025-2026. Estos documentos son
un requisito para la asistencia directa bajo ciertos
programas de financiamiento de Departamento
de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano (siglas en ingles
HUD), incluyendo el Programa de Subvenciones
en Bloque para el Desarrollo Comunitario
(CDBG) y el Programa HOME.
Se llevará a cabo una audiencia pública sobre el
borrador del Plan Quinquenal Consolidado 2025-
2029 y el Plan de Acción Anual para recibir los
aportes de los ciudadanos de la siguiente
manera:
Detalles de la Audiencia Pública: Fecha y Hora:
lunes 21 de abril de 2025 y 6:00 p.m. Ubicación:
Cámaras del Consejo de Huntington Park, 6550
Miles Avenue, Huntington Park, CA 90255
Una copia del Plan Consolidado Quinquenal y del
Plan de Acción Anual para el Año Fiscal 2025-
2026 está disponible para inspección y revisión
pública desde el 6 de marzo de 2025 hasta el 7
de abril de 2025, en las siguientes ubicaciones:
Ayuntamiento, Secretario Municipal y
Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario en
6550 Miles Ave, Biblioteca de Huntington Park en
6518 Miles Ave y Salt Lake Park en 3401 E.
Florence, Huntington Park, CA.
El Plan Consolidado proporciona las metas y
objetivos que la Ciudad espera lograr utilizando
los fondos CDBG y HOME durante los próximos
cinco años. El Plan de Acción Anual 2025-2026
especifica los recursos disponibles para
satisfacer las necesidades identificadas. Las
actividades que se espera cubrir son las
siguientes: Programa para Personas Mayores,
Programa Después de la Escuela, Programa de
Mejoramiento de Fachadas, Programa de
Vivienda Justa y Administración de CDBG.
La Ciudad tiene la intención de presentar el Plan
de Vivienda y Desarrollo Comunitario al
Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano
de los Estados Unidos (HUD, por sus siglas en
inglés) el 31 de mayo de 2025 o antes. Se alienta
a las personas interesadas a expresar sus
opiniones sobre el Plan Consolidado y el Plan de
Acción Anual para el Año Fiscal 2025/26 por
correo electrónico enviando comentarios a Ishah
Ahumada en [email protected] o por escrito
al Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario, 6550
Miles Avenue, Huntington Park, CA 90255, a la
atención: Ishah Ahumada, Gerente de Vivienda.
Se considerarán todos los comentarios recibidos
antes del 7 de abril de 2025 antes de las 5:00
p.m.
El objetivo de la Ciudad es cumplir con la
Sección 504 de la Ley de Rehabilitación de 1973,
enmendada por la Ley de Estadounidenses con
Discapacidades (ADA, por sus siglas en inglés)
de 1990 y la Ley de Enmienda de la ADA de
2008, la Ley de Vivienda Justa y la Ley de
Barreras Arquitectónicas en todos los aspectos.
Por esta razón, se ofrecen adaptaciones
especiales para discapacidades y/o barreras
lingüísticas, incluyendo servicios de traducción al
español, según lo requiere el Plan de
Participación Ciudadana de la Ciudad.
Cualquier solicitud de adaptaciones especiales
puede dirigirse a Ishah Ahumada, al (323) 584-
6290 o por correo electrónico a
[email protected]. Las solicitudes de
adaptación deben hacerse al menos 48 horas
antes de la reunión para permitir que el personal
de la Ciudad tenga tiempo suficiente para
organizar servicios razonables durante la
audiencia.
3/6/25
PRE-3902158#
HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN
ITEM 2
F=+J
J
J
'1+JJ>,JJ
#2+J077>H4=1JE'(7+J75DEDJE2+J'AAB@G+*J%!JD)2+*F7+JE2'EJH'DJAB+G6>FD7IJ'AAB>G+*J(IJ 4EIJ>F=)47J>=J+)+;(+BJ
J
J
#2+B+JH477J(+J=>J4<A')EJ>=JE2+J)FBB+=EJJ4D)'7J&+'BJ
J(F*1+EJ+14==4=1J
6D)'8J &+'BDJ
J E2+J J '79>)'E6>=J 2'DJ (++=JB+*F)+*J (IJ
J #3+B+J
H479J(+J'JI+'B7IJA'I;+=EJ>-J
J-C><J=>=-+*+B'7J.F=*DJ-?BJ6D)'7J&+'BJ
J
'=*J
J-?BJ4D)'9J&+'BDJ
J'=*J
J-?BJ'JE>E':J>-JJ
$A>=JE2+J>F=)47DJ*5B+)E6>=JDE'/JH479JAB>)++*JH6E2J')E5>=DJ'DJ*4B+)E+* J
$.
#&J%,
.#
J $,
J(!
.J !J ."
!#
.J.J #
.J J#(J
#&J J
($.#
.# .J !+’"J&!J
J ." ,
#J ,. .J ,. J.J
!"#J&!J
J..$,J#
.J ,.
F4DJ
>C'7+DJ
=E+B4;J>;;F=4EIJ+G+7>A;+=EJ6B+)E>BJ
EE')2;+=EDJ
J!+A'I;+=EJ1B++;+=E
J%!
ITEM 3
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK
Finance Department
City Council Agenda Report
June 25, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Huntington Park
6550 Miles Avenue
Huntington Park, CA 90255
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
CONSIDERATION AND REVIEW OF DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 6-2.112 OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK’S MUNICIPAL CODE (172.54 REFUSE COLLECTION FEES)
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Conduct a Public Hearing; and
2. Take public testimony; and
3. Review Valley Vista’s list of Delinquent Accounts; and
4. Inform the property owners that they have until the second Council meeting in July to pay the delinquent billings before the resolution is presented to place on the County Tax Rolls.
PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Valley Vista is the City's residential and commercial waste hauler. As required by the City’s franchise agreement with Valley Vista and in accordance with Section 6-2.112 of the City of Huntington Park Municipal Code, Valley Vista has provided a list of delinquent residential and commercial accounts for the purpose of debt collection. Collection of delinquent accounts, including all applicable fees and penalties, is accomplished through the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller’s Office via the annual property tax roll.
The City would like to give those property owners/account holders time to pay before these delinquent charges are placed on the property tax roll.
The formal Resolution authorizing and directing the County assessor to include delinquent refuse collection fees as a special assessment to be collected at the same time and in the same manner as county taxes is not being presented until the City Council meeting on July 21, 2025.
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 6-
2.112 OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK’S MUNICIPAL CODE (172.54 REFUSE
COLLECTION FEES)
June 25, 2024
FACTS AND PROVISIONS/LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
The City’s franchise agreement with the waste hauler provides for municipal solid waste and recycling collection, transport, and disposal services (“Refuse Disposal Service”) to residential and commercial properties in the City. Residential and operating businesses are required to have Refuse Disposal Service and each property owner of a residential and commercial property is ultimately responsible for the payment of charges for service provided. In the event that the Refuse Disposal Service charge billed by the City’s waste hauler is not paid, the provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 5473a and Section 6-2.112 of the City of Huntington Park Municipal Code authorizes the City to collect the delinquent Refuse Disposal Service charges from the owners of the residential and commercial properties shown on the property tax roll after notice is given and a public hearing is held by the Huntington Park City Council.
This notice and public hearing will be held at a later date in July.
FISCAL IMPACT/FINANCING
The City does receive franchise fees and AB 939 fees from Valley Vista as they conduct business in the City and charge for their waste hauling services. These are paid on a monthly basis.
Upon receipt of monies from the Los Angeles County Auditor-Collector for delinquent refuse, the City will remit payment to Valley Vista equal to the actual amount recovered less ten percent (10%), in accordance with Section 6-2.112 of the City of Huntington Park Municipal Code to cover the City's cost in the collection of the delinquent fees. The City will also receive payment of the franchise fee from Valley Vista for the amount of delinquent fees received via the County tax roll.
CONCLUSION
This is being presented to give ample time for the property owners to pay the delinquent billings before the charges are placed on the county tax roll.
The Resolution will be presented at the City Council meeting on July 21, 2025.
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT REFUSE CHARGES PURSUANT TO SECTION 6-
2.112 OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK’S MUNICIPAL CODE (172.54 REFUSE
COLLECTION FEES)
June 25, 2024
Respectfully submitted,
RICARDO REYES
City Manager
JEFF JONES
Director of Finance
ATTACHMENT(S)
A. List of Delinquent Accounts
Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
PARCEL # NAME ADDRESS BALANCE CITY FEE TOTAL DUE
6210357128 ALBERTO M & ALICIA V ZUNIGA 2214 MORTIMER AVE $ 276.27 $ 27.63 $ 303.90 6212001025 HECTOR & MARTHA MALDONADO 3103 WALNUT ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6212002005 OLGA LUCIA ROJAS 2926 FLORENCE AVE B $ 159.96 $ 16.00 $ 175.96 6212002013 CHANG CHU YOUNG/CHU YOUNG CHAN 3000 1/2 E FLORENCE AVE $ 208.36 $ 20.84 $ 229.20 6212002025 JOSE B & MIRIAM HENRIQUEZ 3055 WALNUT ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6212002026 EDWARD RAMOS 3049 WALNUT ST $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6212005045 RICHARD & DOLORES A & E LOPEZ 3203 LIVE OAK ST & 1/2 $ 99.60 $ 9.96 $ 109.56 6212012041 THOMAS D & DEBRA M BURGER 3208 HOPE ST $ 95.16 $ 9.52 $ 104.68 6212013044 MARIA CESMA 3213 OLIVE ST $ 213.90 $ 21.39 $ 235.29 6212013045 SOCORRO MENDEZ 3209 OLIVE ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6213001017 AUGUSTIN NIEVES 3303 WALNUT ST $ 380.08 $ 38.01 $ 418.09 6213001019 ZONNI M & ZONNI A 3257 WALNUT ST $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6213004007 DANIEL & ISABEL VALENCIA 3252 WALNUT ST $ 151.62 $ 15.16 $ 166.78 6213004009 JOSE R & DINA LETICI TURCIOS 3247 CALIFORNIA ST $ 172.11 $ 17.21 $ 189.32 6213005004 ISAI V & HILDA SANDOVAL 3327 CALIFORNIA ST $ 37.02 $ 3.70 $ 40.72 6213008012 DAVID SUAREZ & BARBARITA CEDEN 3372 CALIFORNIA ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6213008013 NANCY MENDOZA 3366 CALIFORNIA ST $ 95.16 $ 9.52 $ 104.68 6213008021 CARLOS GONZALEZ 3329 LIVE OAK ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6213010019 LAURA C GAONA 3319 FLOWER ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6213011005 JESSICA ROOSINISALDA GOMEZ 3333 FLOWER ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6213011020 JOSE G PORRAS 3377 FLOWER ST $ 297.04 $ 29.70 $ 326.74 6213011021 ESTHER MERMEA 3381 FLOWER ST $ 274.20 $ 27.42 $ 301.62 6213012015 TEODULO P TR GARCIA 3467 FLOWER ST $ 177.45 $ 17.75 $ 195.20 6213014001 KRISTIN CASTILLO 3408 FLOWER ST $ 122.87 $ 12.29 $ 135.16 6213014023 MARIA LOURDES MENDOZ 3328 1/2 FLOWER ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6213015007 MARCIAL A MARTINEZ 3462 FLOWER ST $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6213016005 MIGUEL AGUILAR 7666 STATE ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6213016008 AMEZCUA CHRISTIAN 3253 GRAND AVE $ 208.10 $ 20.81 $ 228.91 6213018017 JAIME F CO TR MENDOZA 3472 HOPE ST $ 103.56 $ 10.36 $ 113.92 6213018018 JAIME F CO TR MENDOZA 3476 HOPE ST $ 207.14 $ 20.71 $ 227.85 6213019003 INGRID JEREZ 3312 GRAND AVE $ 101.77 $ 10.18 $ 111.95 6213019012 PORFIRIO M XIQUIN 3260 GRAND AVE $ 137.59 $ 13.76 $ 151.35 6213020012 JERRY & VANESSA POTTS 3372 GRAND AVE $ 135.18 $ 13.52 $ 148.70 6213020014 JESUS N HERNANDEZ 3362 GRAND AVE $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6213020020 BLANCA DUENAS 3333 OLIVE ST A & B $ 37.10 $ 3.71 $ 40.81 6213021002 GONZALO F BAYARDO 3470 GRAND AVE $ 45.54 $ 4.55 $ 50.09 6213021008 JAVIER & ALMA R CASIQUE 3462 GRAND AVE $ 144.16 $ 14.42 $ 158.58 6213021011 YOLANDA GARCIA 3451 OLIVE ST $ 144.85 $ 14.49 $ 159.34 6213023026 PATRICIA C LAURENT 3326 OLIVE ST $ 96.55 $ 9.66 $ 106.21 6213024014 JUAN & GUADALUPE DUENAS 3462 OLIVE ST $ 68.85 $ 6.89 $ 75.74 6213025008 LUIS GARCIA 3303 BROADWAY $ 103.56 $ 10.36 $ 113.92 6213025020 JOANNA SEZANO 3227 BROADWAY 1 $ 454.70 $ 45.47 $ 500.17 6213026021 JOSE G ARCINIEGA 3333 BROADWAY $ 107.13 $ 10.71 $ 117.84 6213027012 BLANCA MORA 3466 HILL ST $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6213027018 ELISEO & ROSA ESTRADA 3424 HILL ST $ 85.72 $ 8.57 $ 94.29 6213027019 TANYA MYERS 3418 HILL ST $ 108.18 $ 10.82 $ 119.00 6213028008 EDGAR A & MARIA F GONZALEZ 3248 BROADWAY $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6213030013 SOTO MARTIN 3462 BROADWAY $ 56.24 $ 5.62 $ 61.86 6213030015 GUSTAVO FLORES 3470 BROADWAY $ 49.02 $ 4.90 $ 53.92 6213030024 OLIVIA C ALVAREZ 3421 CUDAHY ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6213032025 VERONICA BARRAZA 3353 SANTA ANA ST $ 239.85 $ 23.99 $ 263.84 6214003007 ANITA RAMIREZ 3517 FLOWER ST $ 416.17 $ 41.62 $ 457.79 6214005011 HECTOR L ALVARADO V. TORRES 3514 FLOWER ST $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6214005016 MAIA RATIANI 7612 1/2 CALIFORNIA AVE A $ 227.41 $ 22.74 $ 250.15 6214007003 CORNERSTONE MGMT GRP INC 7664 CALIFORNIA AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6214007004 MIGUEL & JOSE AGUILERA 7668 CALIFORNIA AVE $ 177.45 $ 17.75 $ 195.20 6214007005 JUAN F & SANDRA MADRID 7672 CALIFORNIA AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6214007011 HENRY GRANADOS 3521 GRAND AVE $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6214008005 SAMUEL & MATILDE ROSAS 3713 GRAND AVE $ 112.87 $ 11.29 $ 124.16 6214008020 ON GRAND AVE LLC 7653 SALT LAKE AVE A $ 172.11 $ 17.21 $ 189.32 6214009010 SERGIO A & GLORIA M TORRES 3535 OLIVE ST $ 136.72 $ 13.67 $ 150.39 6214010014 MARTIN ROSAS 3720 GRAND AVE $ 47.58 $ 4.76 $ 52.34 6214011005 JESSIE MARCIAL 7711 SALT LAKE AVE $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6214013002 EDUARDO HERNANDEZ 3632 OLIVE ST $ 97.94 $ 9.79 $ 107.73 6214013019 RAFAEL BECERRA 3803 HILL ST $ 47.58 $ 4.76 $ 52.34 6214013024 IRVING PACHECO 3808 OLIVE ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6214014006 RESIDENT 3821 HILL ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6214014007 SUSANA FARIAS 3825 HILL ST $ 277.56 $ 27.76 $ 305.32 6214014011 FRANCISCO CRUZ 3831 HILL ST B $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6214015014 LORRAINE CHAVEZ 7807 SALT LAKE AVE $ 386.82 $ 38.68 $ 425.50 6214016013 INGRID VEGA 3518 HILL ST & 1/2 $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6214016021 WENDY VIZCARRA 7862 CALIFORNIA AVE $ 208.58 $ 20.86 $ 229.44 6214017027 MARISOL MORRIS 3815 BROADWAY $ 191.54 $ 19.15 $ 210.69 6214018010 GABRIEL & MARICELA L GUTIERREZ 4001 BROADWAY $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6214019029 JUAN & LORENA TORO 7857 1/2 SALT LAKE AVE $ 416.17 $ 41.62 $ 457.79 6214020018 APRIL MARTINEZ 3534 BROADWAY $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6214020021 CARLOS A. SANTIAGO GACIA 3612 BROADWAY $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6214021022 ROSA PLASCENCIA 3804 BROADWAY $ 176.32 $ 17.63 $ 193.95 6214022002 JULIA CAROLINA ALDANA 3822 BROADWAY $ 110.70 $ 11.07 $ 121.77 6214022011 RUBI G. HERNANDEZ & MARK A.& P 3832 BROADWAY $ 190.86 $ 19.09 $ 209.95 6214025003 KUMAR FAMILY LIVING TRUST 3505 SANTA ANA ST $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6214026009 ALEX OMAR TINAJERO 3727 SANTA ANA ST $ 289.02 $ 28.90 $ 317.92 6214026015 CELESTE ARAUZ 3710 CUDAHY ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6214027003 ELBA A & LEO GONZALEZ 4003 SANTA ANA ST $ 137.59 $ 13.76 $ 151.35 6214027006 JORGE & GAUDENCIA REYES 3923 SANTA ANA ST $ 216.23 $ 21.62 $ 237.85 6214027017 ISAIAS & SENAIDA P ESTRADA 3903 SANTA ANA ST $ 454.70 $ 45.47 $ 500.17 6214027025 ANGEL ORTIZ LOPEZ 4000 CUDAHY ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6214027026 JUAN M VASQUEZ 3932 CUDAHY ST $ 83.30 $ 8.33 $ 91.63 6214028010 ENRIQUE B CASTRO 4063 SANTA ANA ST $ 177.45 $ 17.75 $ 195.20 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6214028022 DANIEL MARTINEZ 4017 SANTA ANA ST A $ 96.34 $ 9.63 $ 105.97 6214029018 GREGORIO CITE SON 4101 SANTA ANA ST $ 207.12 $ 20.71 $ 227.83 6232290908 ALEJANDRO RAMIREZ 7027 MISSION PL $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6248242748 MANUEL MORADO 7029 MILES AVE $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6267185558 JUANA O RODRIGUEZ 6723 MILES AVE $ 212.44 $ 21.24 $ 233.68 6283137398 ERICK S CRUZ 6341 MILES AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6301083218 DAVID N & SOCORRO P GARDUNO 6023 MILES AVE $ 105.10 $ 10.51 $ 115.61 6309015023 AURELIO GUTIERREZ 2540 E 57TH ST $ 47.58 $ 4.76 $ 52.34 6309015024 MARIA V ZAMUDIO 2548 E 57TH ST $ 295.73 $ 29.57 $ 325.30 6309015025 ARMANDO D VILLASENOR 2550 E 57TH ST $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6309022005 ALFONSO HERNANDEZ 2619 1/2 E 56TH ST $ 142.74 $ 14.27 $ 157.01 6309023009 EILEEN GRANADOS 2633 E 57TH ST $ 297.67 $ 29.77 $ 327.44 6309029010 LUIS OCHOA 2746 E 58TH ST $ 136.72 $ 13.67 $ 150.39 6310021092 ALMA D CONTRERAS 2979 RANDOLPH ST $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6310021096 VERONICA JYC/ OCHOA 2940 E 61ST ST $ 103.56 $ 10.36 $ 113.92 6310022079 NEW OWNER 2964 E 60TH PL $ 72.86 $ 7.29 $ 80.15 6310023114 RESIDENT 6021 ARBUTUS AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6310025024 MARTIN AND ARICELIA NAVA 3056 E 60TH PL $ 310.70 $ 31.07 $ 341.77 6310025045 RHINO CAPITAL & INVESTMENT 3063 RANDOLPH ST $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6312025019 NORMA MATA 5929 FISHBURN AVE $ 124.92 $ 12.49 $ 137.41 6312025022 ARLENE GARCIA 5914 OTIS AVE $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6312025025 OMAR LOPEZ 5915 FISHBURN AVE $ 303.18 $ 30.32 $ 333.50 6312027012 VINCENT & IRMA G LEMUS 5954 RIVERSIDE AVE $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6312027017 NESTOR MORA 5963 GIFFORD AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6312027020 MARIA GARCIA 3327 CUDAHY ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6312028013 STEVE ACUNA 5959 RIVERSIDE AVE $ 296.81 $ 29.68 $ 326.49 6313031024 ANA L CASTRILLON 4315 E 60TH ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6314044088 RAFAEL LOPEZ 3540 E 61ST ST $ 177.45 $ 17.75 $ 195.20 6317005001 NELSON & SANDRA CASTILLO 4207 E 61ST ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6317006015 DANIEL GUTIERREZ ROMERO 6061 OTIS AVE A $ 415.19 $ 41.52 $ 456.71 6317006023 LUIS & IRMA CAMACHO 6072 GIFFORD AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6317006029 GERONIMO NAJERA HERNANDEZ 4118 E 60TH ST $ 256.57 $ 25.66 $ 282.23 6317007030 URBANO XOCHIMITL 6075 GIFFORD AVE $ 207.61 $ 20.76 $ 228.37 6317008008 RITA RIVAS 6059 RIVERSIDE AVE $ 137.10 $ 13.71 $ 150.81 6317008009 ROBERT CHAVEZ 6055 RIVERSIDE AVE $ 47.58 $ 4.76 $ 52.34 6317008014 FERNANDO & IRMA VALLE 6030 CORONA AVE $ 31.73 $ 3.17 $ 34.90 6317008027 MARIA & GERARDO ALCALA 4010 E 60TH ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6317009007 JUAN C VAZQUEZ 6163 RIVERSIDE AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6317010023 MARIO PEREZ 6171 GIFFORD AVE $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6317011005 CONSUELO GUERRA FLORES 6160 GIFFORD AVE & A & B $ 647.46 $ 64.75 $ 712.21 6317011006 CONSUELO GUERRA FLORES 6166 GIFFORD AVE $ 426.20 $ 42.62 $ 468.82 6317011012 MARIA TR ESQUEDA 4122 E 61ST ST $ 275.18 $ 27.52 $ 302.70 6317011017 ALEJANDRO LIZARRAGA 6106 GIFFORD AVE $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6317011019 TERESITA ALBA 6114 GIFFORD AVE $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6317012020 ELIAS & BLANCA VALDEZ 6114 OTIS AVE $ 281.49 $ 28.15 $ 309.64 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6318009020 MARIA H DIAZ 6013 MAYWOOD AVE 10 $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6318009028 MARIA L MARTINEZ 6017 MAYWOOD AVE $ 196.89 $ 19.69 $ 216.58 6318014016 ADRIANA SAID & BERTHA ROMERO 3624 E 60TH ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6318015023 NORMA SALAZAR 3605 E 61ST ST $ 47.58 $ 4.76 $ 52.34 6318015031 JOSE FIGUEROA 3550 E 60TH PL $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6318015037 EVERARDO & VIRGINIA HERNANDEZ 3524 E 60TH PL $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6318016023 JOSE & MATILDE BIRRUETA 3531 E 61ST PL $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6318016041 LAZARO & NATIVIDAD PEDRAJA 3515 E 61ST PL $ 634.33 $ 63.43 $ 697.76 6318017006 JESUS GUTIERREZ / ORANTES ASHL 3639 RANDOLPH ST $ 208.10 $ 20.81 $ 228.91 6318017014 FERNANDO L LOPEZ 3634 E 61ST PL $ 106.02 $ 10.60 $ 116.62 6318018012 JESUS GUTIERREZ 3639 RANDOLPH PL $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6318018019 MARCIA CABRERA & BERTHA JIMENEZ 3727 RANDOLPH PL & A & B $ 863.28 $ 86.33 $ 949.61 6318026023 RESIDENT 3707 RANDOLPH ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6318026026 DEBORAH DAWN ZAMORA 3723 RANDOLPH ST $ 43.14 $ 4.31 $ 47.45 6318028009 ROLANDO MERINO & ROLANDA MERIN 6159 BEAR AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6318028017 MARGARITA RODRIGUEZ 3827 RANDOLPH ST $ 207.61 $ 20.76 $ 228.37 6318029013 MARIA & IRMA CORNEJO RAMOS 6128 BEAR AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6318029023 JOSEFINA BASULTO 3911 RANDOLPH ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6318034013 ADRIANA M DEYET 5973 CORONA AVE $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6319001025 CECILIA GONZALEZ 2877 CLARENDON AVE $ 297.04 $ 29.70 $ 326.74 6319001037 LAURA ASTORGA 6126 MILES AVE C $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6319001038 JAIME & MARIA BRAVO 6126 MILES AVE A $ 208.10 $ 20.81 $ 228.91 6319002017 GABRIELA SILONZOCHILT 6325 GENTRY ST $ 48.97 $ 4.90 $ 53.87 6319003015 HECTOR BECERRA 6350 GENTRY ST $ 62.30 $ 6.23 $ 68.53 6319004006 VALENTIN & ADELA CONTRERA 6313 MARCONI ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6319004011 ROSA S ZARZA FAMILY TRUST 6340 PASSAIC ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6319004013 CARLOS A ALFARO 6350 1/2 PASSAIC ST $ 93.36 $ 9.34 $ 102.70 6319004020 RICARDO VAZQUEZ & MARIA D RODR 6341 MARCONI ST $ 115.70 $ 11.57 $ 127.27 6319005018 GURWINDER & PARWINDER KAUR GIL 6356 MARCONI ST $ 136.72 $ 13.67 $ 150.39 6319006018 MIRZABEK KULATTI 2983 CLARENDON AVE $ 104.08 $ 10.41 $ 114.49 6319007026 IDALIA ESCOBAR NAJERA 6362 ARBUTUS AVE $ 198.55 $ 19.86 $ 218.41 6319008035 DAVID CABEZAS & BERTHA SANCHEZ 6228 CEDAR ST $ 131.18 $ 13.12 $ 144.30 6319008036 LILIANA & ROSALIBA MARISCAL 6222 CEDAR ST A $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6319011013 ROBERT L FALVEY 3169 E GAGE AVE $ 68.16 $ 6.82 $ 74.98 6319011022 ALQUZA SABRI 6340 BENSON ST $ 265.32 $ 26.53 $ 291.85 6319012015 ANICETO ANGELES 6312 BENSON ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6319013019 ANTONIO C & GUADALUPE FLORES 6239 HOOD AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6319013021 ISRAEL J RODRIGUEZ 6231 HOOD AVE $ 208.10 $ 20.81 $ 228.91 6319013022 ANDRES CO TR RODRIGUEZ 6227 HOOD AVE $ 62.93 $ 6.29 $ 69.22 6319013025 RODOLOFO TORRES 6213 HOOD AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6319014002 ARMANDO & SARA CORTES 6320 PLASKA AVE $ 205.08 $ 20.51 $ 225.59 6319014018 RIVERA DAVID J/RIVERA MARIA D 6337 HOOD AVE $ 426.31 $ 42.63 $ 468.94 6319014022 RAFAEL & BETTY D GONZALEZ 6319 HOOD AVE $ 59.18 $ 5.92 $ 65.10 6319014023 RAFAEL & BETTY D GONZALEZ 6315 HOOD AVE $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6319015008 FATIMA R MORALES 6350 HOOD AVE $ 181.32 $ 18.13 $ 199.45 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6319016004 ALBERTO ARAUZ 6218 HOOD AVE $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6319016021 ELVIRA MANDUJANO 6239 NEWELL ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6319017010 JESUS RIVERA 6306 NEWELL ST $ 201.33 $ 20.13 $ 221.46 6319018024 MARIA A LOPEZ 6329 HOLLENBECK ST $ 213.90 $ 21.39 $ 235.29 6319019013 SLE ENTERPRISES INC 3309 E GAGE AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6319021017 LOPEZ VERONICA (TE)/VILLA HIDA 3341 BENEDICT WAY $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6319021022 MARIA D HEREDIA 6320 BISSELL ST $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6320006016 ANN M RIOS 5931 STAFFORD AVE 5 $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6320006018 SAMANTHA M EMILY FONSECA/CARLO 5951 STAFFORD AVE $ 89.91 $ 8.99 $ 98.90 6320007022 SALVADOR & MARIA OLMOS 5937 TEMPLETON ST $ 214.38 $ 21.44 $ 235.82 6320007026 RAUL GONZALEZ 5953 TEMPLETON ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6320008038 EVELYN ORTIZ 5951 MILES AVE $ 47.58 $ 4.76 $ 52.34 6320009046 ALFREDO MORA 6004 TEMPLETON ST $ 41.20 $ 4.12 $ 45.32 6320010051 JOSUE CANTU 6045 TEMPLETON ST $ 139.69 $ 13.97 $ 153.66 6320010919 LILIANA IBARRA & ALEX CEDENO 6042 STAFFORD AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6320012016 RICARDO & MARGARITA AREVALO 6029 SEVILLE AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6320012037 GODFREY & MESA LISA OROZCO 6037 SEVILLE AVE $ 140.49 $ 14.05 $ 154.54 6320015023 ROBERT GATIGA 6029 RUGBY AVE $ 214.86 $ 21.49 $ 236.35 6320015031 TRANQUILINO FLORES 2520 BELGRAVE AVE $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6320016020 ANTONIO PEREZ 6015 MALABAR ST $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6320016031 ROSA MUNGUIA 6014 MIDDLETON ST $ 78.21 $ 7.82 $ 86.03 6320019038 RUTH M ALVAREZ 6147 RUGBY AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6320025001 ALEJANDRO C & BLANCA J NORIEGA 2815 CLARENDON AVE $ 195.82 $ 19.58 $ 215.40 6320025010 JACOB & CELIA BANDA 6205 MILES AVE $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6320027005 DANIEL TR PEREZ 6326 1/2 STAFFORD AVE $ 102.54 $ 10.25 $ 112.79 6320028022 ALEX CASTRO 6353 STAFFORD AVE $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6320032003 CABALLERO NORMA P 2514 CLARENDON AVE $ 738.86 $ 73.89 $ 812.75 6320032011 RIGOBERTO JURADO 6350 MALABAR ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6321003064 EDITH LOPEZ 5936 MIDDLETON ST $ 50.22 $ 5.02 $ 55.24 6321009008 SHELLEY RODENAS 6210 COTTAGE ST $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6321009012 ARTURO RODRIGUEZ 6142 COTTAGE ST $ 622.78 $ 62.28 $ 685.06 6321010030 MOISES AND CLAUDIA RUIZ 6151 MARBRISA AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6321012022 SALVADOR HERNANDEZ 6149 MIDDLETON ST $ 205.08 $ 20.51 $ 225.59 6321014004 OSCAR & VICTORIA ORTEGA 6332 MARBRISA AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6321014013 EVARISTO & SARA A MARTINEZ 6331 SANTA FE AVE $ 191.54 $ 19.15 $ 210.69 6321015016 MIRIAM ZARAGOSA 6325 MARBRISA AVE $ 103.56 $ 10.36 $ 113.92 6321015019 RIGOBERTO CANTINCA 6335 MARBRISA AVE $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6321015025 2018-4 IH BORROWER 6360 ALBANY ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6321016004 AMELIA L VILLAREAL 6332 COTTAGE ST $ 416.17 $ 41.62 $ 457.79 6321016008 AVELINO VALDEZ 6312 COTTAGE ST & 1/2 $ 427.76 $ 42.78 $ 470.54 6321016018 MARGARITA VENEGAS 6333 ALBANY ST $ 65.82 $ 6.58 $ 72.40 6321016032 DANIEL & CLAUDIA GALINDO 2121 E GAGE AVE $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6321018015 ALEX & JOSEPHINE A HERNANDEZ 6531 COTTAGE ST A&B $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6321018022 DOROTHY HOARD 6535 REGENT ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6321018031 DOROTHY HOARD 6541 REGENT ST $ 103.56 $ 10.36 $ 113.92 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6321018040 GILBERTO ANGELES GARCIA 6424 REGENT ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6321019012 SALVADOR & ROSA MAGDALENO 6416 COTTAGE ST & FRONT $ 375.78 $ 37.58 $ 413.36 6321020001 JUANA M PARRA 6503 MARBRISA AVE $ 144.16 $ 14.42 $ 158.58 6321020012 MIGUEL & ANA M SILVA 6520 ALBANY ST $ 69.06 $ 6.91 $ 75.97 6321020021 RLY 26 INVESTMENTS LLC 6421 MARBRISA AVE $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6321020022 TORRES INVESTMENT PROPERTIES L 6425 MARBRISA AVE & 1/2 & B $ 601.95 $ 60.20 $ 662.15 6321020023 VERONICA GARCIA 6431 MARBRISA AVE $ 102.54 $ 10.25 $ 112.79 6321021012 HAROLD D & ANNA M GANN 6514 MARBRISA AVE $ 422.78 $ 42.28 $ 465.06 6321025012 DINORA GOMEZ 6818 ALBANY ST $ 207.12 $ 20.71 $ 227.83 6321026011 JOSE M & OLIVIA CAMPOS 2212 ZOE AVE $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6321026016 RICARDO SANCHEZ 2319 MORTIMER AVE $ 412.77 $ 41.28 $ 454.05 6321027011 CARLY & JUAN MOLINA 2156 ZOE AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6321027013 JOSE OROZCO 2132 ZOE AVE $ 427.13 $ 42.71 $ 469.84 6321027015 LEONARDO M LOPEZ 2116 ZOE AVE $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6321029011 XOCHILT ET AL SANCHEZ 6919 ALBANY ST $ 72.68 $ 7.27 $ 79.95 6321029015 BLANCA JIMENEZ 6903 ALBANY ST $ 587.73 $ 58.77 $ 646.50 6321030014 JUAN M PEREZ 7111 MARBRISA AVE $ 214.13 $ 21.41 $ 235.54 6321030021 LUIS MIS 7030 ALBANY ST $ 424.40 $ 42.44 $ 466.84 6321031027 HELMA LIMA 7028 MARBRISA AVE $ 69.73 $ 6.97 $ 76.70 6321034010 MIRTALA ORELLANA 6110 SANTA FE AVE $ 208.10 $ 20.81 $ 228.91 6322002002 TORKIAN PARIZ 2504 E GAGE AVE $ 135.82 $ 13.58 $ 149.40 6322002003 PARVIZ & MAGHOULEH TORKIAN 6408 MALABAR ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6322002004 DANNY BALCAZAR 6412 MALABAR ST A $ 138.77 $ 13.88 $ 152.65 6322008013 LETICIA VELASQUEZ 6522 TEMPLETON ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6322012015 NEREO & BERTHA LEON 6808 TEMPLETON ST $ 414.22 $ 41.42 $ 455.64 6322020001 STEVE & STELLA SOVAS 6604 MIDDLETON ST $ 108.06 $ 10.81 $ 118.87 6322020027 ANTONIO ROMERO 6823 MALABAR ST $ 216.17 $ 21.62 $ 237.79 6322021014 MARIA E OLIVA 6915 MALABAR ST $ 136.72 $ 13.67 $ 150.39 6322021023 AGUSTIN SR PULIDO 7117 MALABAR ST $ 373.72 $ 37.37 $ 411.09 6322029002 ANGEL G ARMENTA CASTRO 7118 STAFFORD AVE A & B $ 497.80 $ 49.78 $ 547.58 6322030004 VAQUERO MOI LLC 6912 TEMPLETON ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6322033027 GUADALUPE MARTINEZ 7017 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6322034022 MANUEL MARTINEZ 6935 PASSAIC ST $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6322035004 FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ 7039 PASSAIC ST $ 419.56 $ 41.96 $ 461.52 6322036014 MICHAEL PENA 6918 RITA AVE $ 55.16 $ 5.52 $ 60.68 6323001023 RAMON CAMPOY 6616 HOOD AVE $ 426.31 $ 42.63 $ 468.94 6323001029 EMILIA BASURTO 6510 HOOD AVE $ 177.45 $ 17.75 $ 195.20 6323001041 ROGELIO NUNEZ 6513 NEWELL ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6323001042 LEO I & AVELINA E GONZALEZ 6517 NEWELL ST $ 70.36 $ 7.04 $ 77.40 6323001046 MARCOS MIRANDA 6619 NEWELL ST $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6323004013 TADEO & LORENZA GONZALEZ 6803 MARCONI ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6323004015 DANIEL LEAL ISITA 6811 MARCONI ST $ 39.34 $ 3.93 $ 43.27 6323004029 ROSA MANZO 6612 PASSAIC ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6323004037 JAIME TIJERIN & MARIA ROBLES 2951 SATURN AVE $ 70.31 $ 7.03 $ 77.34 6323005014 RIA M LOANNIDIS 6908 PASSAIC ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6323006009 ANGEL & MARISELA MARTINEZ 7109 MARCONI ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6323006017 HASSAN HASSAN 7034 PASSAIC ST $ 422.00 $ 42.20 $ 464.20 6323006024 VALERIE LUJANO & TRINIDAD LUJA 7130 PASSAIC ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6323007023 MARIO& ESTELA S GOMEZ 7115 ARBUTUS AVE $ 47.58 $ 4.76 $ 52.34 6323008001 VERONICA GONZALEZ 6900 MARCONI ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6323008010 GERARDO HERNANDEZ 7010 MARCONI ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6323008013 CATARINO GARCIA 7009 ARBUTUS AVE $ 297.04 $ 29.70 $ 326.74 6323009017 FERMIN & ANGELA CASTILLO 6815 ARBUTUS AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6323009030 ALEJANDRO ARMENDARIZ 6626 MARCONI ST $ 115.82 $ 11.58 $ 127.40 6323011022 HERMELINDA ORTEGA & JAVIER RIV 3220 ZOE AVE $ 426.32 $ 42.63 $ 468.95 6323011041 JACQUELINE BUGARIN 6822 PLASKA AVE $ 270.53 $ 27.05 $ 297.58 6323011054 GRACIELA CHAVEZ 3219 SATURN AVE $ 298.33 $ 29.83 $ 328.16 6323012065 RENE ZENDEJAS 6808 HOOD AVE $ 296.83 $ 29.68 $ 326.51 6323014008 RESIDENT 6418 ARBUTUS AVE $ 454.70 $ 45.47 $ 500.17 6323014021 RICHARD M & GLORIA F FLORES 6517 CEDAR ST $ 207.61 $ 20.76 $ 228.37 6323014022 CLAUDIA FLORES 6518 CEDAR ST $ 95.16 $ 9.52 $ 104.68 6323014041 ANTONIO AVINA 6503 STATE ST $ 193.70 $ 19.37 $ 213.07 6323015003 AARON N CARRASCO 6611 STATE ST $ 218.90 $ 21.89 $ 240.79 6323015004 AARON N CARRASCO 6617 STATE ST $ 221.23 $ 22.12 $ 243.35 6323016013 JOSE GUARDADO 6727 CEDAR ST $ 34.66 $ 3.47 $ 38.13 6323016017 R & R REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 6815 CEDAR ST $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6323016024 MARIA G MENDEZ 6730 ARBUTUS AVE $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6323016040 GARCIA FAMILY TRUST 6831 CEDAR ST $ 103.56 $ 10.36 $ 113.92 6323018010 JUAN MENDEZ 7126 ARBUTUS AVE $ 60.98 $ 6.10 $ 67.08 6323018011 GUSTAVO RUIZ 7130 ARBUTUS AVE $ 298.20 $ 29.82 $ 328.02 6323020002 JUSTO LIMON 6910 CEDAR ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6323020018 JUAN R. BARRERA & MERCEDES RIV 6929 STATE ST $ 208.10 $ 20.81 $ 228.91 6323023001 RAY R CO TR NEJAD 6703 BENSON ST $ 416.17 $ 41.62 $ 457.79 6323023026 LUIS M & GLORIA BARILLAS 6706 STATE ST $ 68.36 $ 6.84 $ 75.20 6323023031 EDMUND SIERRA & LAURIE MORALES 3111 SATURN AVE $ 123.66 $ 12.37 $ 136.03 6323024023 RICARDO & ROSALINA IBARRA 6511 BENSON ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6323025028 ESTHER AGUILAR 7122 BENSON ST $ 344.21 $ 34.42 $ 378.63 6323025040 MINERVINO A JR ROJAS 7101 PLASKA AVE $ 207.14 $ 20.71 $ 227.85 6323025041 MOE & LINA KERMANI 7065 1/2 STATE ST $ 207.83 $ 20.78 $ 228.61 6323026055 GONZALO C JIMENEZ 7116 STATE ST $ 102.54 $ 10.25 $ 112.79 6323026063 AMA INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 7031 HOOD AVE $ 320.85 $ 32.09 $ 352.94 6323028049 HUMBERTO MOJICA 7122 HOOD AVE A $ 207.61 $ 20.76 $ 228.37 6323028050 FERNANDO IZARRARAZ 7122 HOOD AVE B $ 215.82 $ 21.58 $ 237.40 6324035014 RAUL SR MOLLEDA 6805 BISSELL ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 6324035045 EUGENIO & BELMAR E HERNANDEZ 6800 HOLLENBECK ST $ 74.96 $ 7.50 $ 82.46 6324035046 FELICIANO PENA 6728 HOLLENBECK ST $ 501.87 $ 50.19 $ 552.06 6324036003 DANIEL SOTELO 6713 HOLLENBECK ST $ 416.17 $ 41.62 $ 457.79 6324036019 LEO GONZALEZ 6840 NEWELL ST $ 275.18 $ 27.52 $ 302.70 6324036027 JOSE M CHAVEZ 6802 NEWELL ST $ 636.81 $ 63.68 $ 700.49 6324036030 JULIAN FERNANDEZ 6718 NEWELL ST $ 34.18 $ 3.42 $ 37.60 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6324037006 JOSE H SOTO 6516 NEWELL ST $ 270.07 $ 27.01 $ 297.08 6324037010 ALEJANDRO ALBA 6418 NEWELL ST $ 103.56 $ 10.36 $ 113.92 6009031004 PHARMEDOC 6100 WILMINGTON AVE $ 257.86 $ 25.79 $ 283.65 6009036034 PINK HORSES LLC 1922 E 64TH ST $ 2,051.67 $ 205.17 $ 2,256.84 6201004009 JACMAR COMPANIES/ SHAKEY PIZZA 2522 E FLORENCE AVE $ 1,560.64 $ 156.06 $ 1,716.70 6212002003 I A REDFOX JR 2916 E FLORENCE AVE $ 566.10 $ 56.61 $ 622.71 6212002009 QUETZAL TRANSMISSION CENTER 2964 E FLORENCE AVE $ 318.41 $ 31.84 $ 350.25 6212002018 RUBEN VILLEGAS 3028 E FLORENCE AVE $ 977.75 $ 97.78 $ 1,075.53 6212002024 RASPADO XPRESS 3052 E FLORENCE AVE $ 2,579.34 $ 257.93 $ 2,837.27 6212005039 CAKES BY MARCE 7415 STATE ST $ 456.73 $ 45.67 $ 502.40 6212008045 VICS EMBROIDERY SHOP 7505 STATE ST $ 616.14 $ 61.61 $ 677.75 6212008046 JOEL CORTEZ DDS 7511 STATE ST $ 336.58 $ 33.66 $ 370.24 6213007019 AGUA AQUI 7404 STATE ST $ 327.65 $ 32.77 $ 360.42 6213016001 DOLLAR BOUTIQUE & CO. & LISANDRA DUR7656 STATE ST & 3240 HOPE ST $ 819.88 $ 81.99 $ 901.87 6214003005 EUGENIO PEGUERO 3501 FLOWER ST $ 126.29 $ 12.63 $ 138.92 6214011008 GUADALUPE ROSALES 3912 GRAND AVE $ 278.87 $ 27.89 $ 306.76 6309002001 PREFERRED MOTORSPORTS LLC 2450 E 52ND ST $ 392.24 $ 39.22 $ 431.46 6309002013 VICTOR BANUELOS & JAESCO MANUFACTU2416 E 52ND ST A & C $ 5,938.60 $ 593.86 $ 6,532.46 6309004007 DENNIS CAFFREY 2425 E 55TH ST $ 630.93 $ 63.09 $ 694.02 6309007003 TRIGAL INC/ OFELIA MARTINEZ 2463 E 58TH ST $ 2,287.66 $ 228.77 $ 2,516.43 6309007004 NUMERO 1 FINISHING 2459 E 58TH ST $ 3,811.61 $ 381.16 $ 4,192.77 6309007012 USA PATTERNS INC. 2444 E 57TH ST $ 209.50 $ 20.95 $ 230.45 6309008002 H P USED AUTO PARTS 2461 E SLAUSON AVE $ 223.14 $ 22.31 $ 245.45 6309008023 K & C AUTO BODY REPAIR 2431 E SLAUSON AVE $ 2,832.63 $ 283.26 $ 3,115.89 6309011006 ADRIENNE INC 5301 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,553.76 $ 155.38 $ 1,709.14 6309012004 LITTLE TRATTORIA 25 5415 PACIFIC BLVD $ 2,024.70 $ 202.47 $ 2,227.17 6309013004 MUT LA LLC 5511 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,274.09 $ 127.41 $ 1,401.50 6309014027 LA AUTOBODY LLC 2538 E 56TH ST $ 1,454.12 $ 145.41 $ 1,599.53 6309015016 MANUEL FIERROS 5704 MALABAR ST $ 178.02 $ 17.80 $ 195.82 6309020001 SAL'S SUPRA GARAGE 5324 PACIFIC BLVD $ 967.56 $ 96.76 $ 1,064.32 6309020003 HERNANDEZ SIGN COMPANY 5300 PACIFIC BLVD $ 870.08 $ 87.01 $ 957.09 6309030011 PROGRESSIVE AUTO BODY SHOP 2755 E SLAUSON AVE $ 1,478.88 $ 147.89 $ 1,626.77 6310016015 TARGET (TGT003406) 5731 BICKETT ST $ 2,171.71 $ 217.17 $ 2,388.88 6310018018 RSNA STAPLES 1367 3090 SLAUSON AVE $ 453.66 $ 45.37 $ 499.03 6310025001 PATRICK MARTINEZ STUDIO 6051 STATE ST $ 354.58 $ 35.46 $ 390.04 6310025002 ADVANTAGE AUTO REPAIR 6057 STATE ST $ 417.77 $ 41.78 $ 459.55 6312026013 ADRIANA TORRES 5956 GIFFORD AVE B $ 1,911.78 $ 191.18 $ 2,102.96 6317004011 ALEXANDRA RODRIGUEZ & PABLO CARBAL 6052 FISHBURN AVE & D $ 1,370.65 $ 137.07 $ 1,507.72 6318008013 DS AND COMPANY 6025 MAYWOOD AVE 5 $ 82.32 $ 8.23 $ 90.55 6318011016 MAYWOOD LLC 5922 MAYWOOD AVE $ 2,022.98 $ 202.30 $ 2,225.28 6318011022 OSCAR MOTORS 5954 MAYWOOD AVE $ 353.11 $ 35.31 $ 388.42 6319007023 CAFE INKA 3047 E GAGE AVE $ 1,672.06 $ 167.21 $ 1,839.27 6319008023 VILMA MEJIA 6374 CEDAR ST $ 816.17 $ 81.62 $ 897.79 6319010012 CESAR POUZEAUD & REYNA'S BEUATY SHO 3115 & 3113 E GAGE AVE $ 1,258.22 $ 125.82 $ 1,384.04 6319018010 IN AND OUT SMOG TEST INC 6356 NEWELL ST $ 1,047.84 $ 104.78 $ 1,152.62 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6319019015 AMERICA FURNITURE 3317 E GAGE AVE $ 635.69 $ 63.57 $ 699.26 6319021001 HS DYE INC. 6240 BISSELL PL $ 278.87 $ 27.89 $ 306.76 6320004046 POLLO CAMPERO OF CALIFORNIA 5990 PACIFIC BLVD $ 730.76 $ 73.08 $ 803.84 6320012014 ANN MARIE RIOS 6013 SEVILLE AVE $ 3,418.30 $ 341.83 $ 3,760.13 6320015016 CASA ADORACION VIVIENTE 2515 RANDOLPH ST $ 1,983.57 $ 198.36 $ 2,181.93 6320018028 ADRIAN TARANGO 6203 MALABAR ST $ 2,878.78 $ 287.88 $ 3,166.66 6320020019 DORIA FURNITURE & MATTRESS 6121 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,138.15 $ 113.82 $ 1,251.97 6320021003 FAN-CEE FASHION 6210 PACIFIC BLVD $ 331.74 $ 33.17 $ 364.91 6320026023 EL MOLINITO INC 6353 MILES AVE $ 3,013.92 $ 301.39 $ 3,315.31 6320028024 G & S TEST ONLY SMOG CHECK 2731 E GAGE AVE A $ 173.20 $ 17.32 $ 190.52 6320030001 GFM VIDA, MORACOMP COMPUTERS, ALEX 6306 & 6304 & 6302 PACIFIC BLV $ 3,032.98 $ 303.30 $ 3,336.28 6320030035 ROSS STORE #2576 6360 PACIFIC BLVD $ 419.75 $ 41.98 $ 461.73 6320031015 SJT ELECTRONICS LLC 6349 PACIFIC BLVD $ 2,657.20 $ 265.72 $ 2,922.92 6320031019 MONARCA INC 6365 PACIFIC BLVD $ 981.63 $ 98.16 $ 1,079.79 6320031020 PH PALACE 6351 PACIFIC BLVD $ 2,348.25 $ 234.83 $ 2,583.08 6320032012 FLORITAS BAKERY & REYES BIKE SHOP 2515 E GAGE AVE & 1/2 $ 2,575.29 $ 257.53 $ 2,832.82 6321001008 ADVANCE PIPE BENDING 2020 E SLAUSON AVE $ 1,550.59 $ 155.06 $ 1,705.65 6321003001 SLAUSON SHELL 2400 SLAUSON AVE $ 58.78 $ 5.88 $ 64.66 6321006017 IMPERIAL BUTTON 2068 BELGRAVE AVE $ 545.32 $ 54.53 $ 599.85 6321006032 FENIX PACKAGING SOLUTION 2069 RANDOLPH ST $ 4,506.41 $ 450.64 $ 4,957.05 6321007032 HPC WELTPOCKET INC 5975 REGENT ST B $ 2,907.80 $ 290.78 $ 3,198.58 6321010017 ARACELIA FLORES 6144 ALBANY ST $ 3,519.03 $ 351.90 $ 3,870.93 6321011028 FRANK SANDOVAL 6147 SANTA FE AVE $ 1,136.39 $ 113.64 $ 1,250.03 6321013032 LA RAMADA RESTAURANT 6330 SANTA FE AVE $ 1,533.33 $ 153.33 $ 1,686.66 6321016020 RICARDO CANO & MIRIAM ESPINOZA 6343 ALBANY ST $ 293.33 $ 29.33 $ 322.66 6321018001 COLIMA GLASS 6405 REGENT ST $ 1,419.69 $ 141.97 $ 1,561.66 6321018003 GREEK INDUSTRY 6415 REGENT ST $ 397.48 $ 39.75 $ 437.23 6321018058 FRARZIN HEKMAT/AMERICAN PRIDE 6420 S ALAMEDA ST $ 265.86 $ 26.59 $ 292.45 6322002110 BLANCA GALLARDO 6526 MALABAR ST $ 291.19 $ 29.12 $ 320.31 6322003016 FROTAN LLC DBA SUPREME DEALS 6511 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,505.19 $ 150.52 $ 1,655.71 6322003018 KLUSA ENTERPRISE SOL BEAUTY AN 6521 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,044.53 $ 104.45 $ 1,148.98 6322003019 JOYERIA MICHELLE & BRIDAL 6531 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,100.01 $ 110.00 $ 1,210.01 6322004003 STEPHANIE'S BRIDAL SALON 6412 PACIFIC BLVD $ 411.60 $ 41.16 $ 452.76 6322004012 LAS PLEBES CHUCHERIAS & FTC HUNTINGT 6526 PACIFIC BLVD B & A $ 3,584.89 $ 358.49 $ 3,943.38 6322007001 APACHE'S CARNES AL CARBON & LAS BRIS 2756 & 2754 E GAGE AVE $ 5,261.45 $ 526.15 $ 5,787.60 6322016011 CAMELO'S MEXI TALIAN COCINA 6823 SEVILLE AVE $ 1,170.42 $ 117.04 $ 1,287.46 6322017005 AMERICA'S BRIDAL 6704 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,305.57 $ 130.56 $ 1,436.13 6322017006 VANITY COUTURE BOUTIQUE 6710 PACIFIC BLVD $ 128.33 $ 12.83 $ 141.16 6322017008 RC CLOSET CORPORATION & UNIVERSAL E 6730 & 6732 PACIFIC BLVD $ 815.26 $ 81.53 $ 896.79 6322017009 FERNANDO O. ROSALES & BLIMP POSTAL 6800 & 6802 PACIFIC BLVD $ 671.13 $ 67.11 $ 738.24 6322018013 XPRESS TAX 2559 SATURN AVE $ 2,126.56 $ 212.66 $ 2,339.22 6322018016 DIEGO MEDEL FASHION 6615 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,928.64 $ 192.86 $ 2,121.50 6322018017 MILANO CLOTHING 6625 PACIFIC BLVD $ 255.94 $ 25.59 $ 281.53 6322018024 JOYERIA MICHELLE & VILLALOBOS FOOTWE6813 & 6815 PACIFIC BLVD B $ 5,136.37 $ 513.64 $ 5,650.01 6322020029 GABRIEL CARRERA 6810 MIDDLETON ST $ 1,618.02 $ 161.80 $ 1,779.82 Exhibit A
City of Huntington Park
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Valley Vista
List of Delinquent Refuse Disposal Accounts
6322023031 TANIAS INCOME TAX 7117 PACIFIC BLVD $ 82.32 $ 8.23 $ 90.55 6322024002 JULIETA'S BRIDAL BOUTIQUE 6906 PACIFIC BLVD $ 385.48 $ 38.55 $ 424.03 6322024003 ANGEL'S BRIDAL Y' TUXEDO 6912 PACIFIC BLVD $ 2,285.84 $ 228.58 $ 2,514.42 6322024032 YES TO THE DRESS LLC 7102 PACIFIC BLVD $ 1,395.75 $ 139.58 $ 1,535.33 6322025042 FERNANDO ROSALES 7013 SEVILLE AVE $ 1,977.29 $ 197.73 $ 2,175.02 6322027003 JOSE CONTRERAS 7118 SEVILLE AVE $ 3,529.67 $ 352.97 $ 3,882.64 6322028018 RICHARD & CARMEN SOLTERO 6929 TEMPLETON ST $ 1,827.73 $ 182.77 $ 2,010.50 6322033017 MEG FINANCIAL SERVICES 2885 E FLORENCE AVE $ 82.32 $ 8.23 $ 90.55 6323001035 RUIZ FURNITURE 3246 E GAGE AVE $ 39.81 $ 3.98 $ 43.79 6323001037 BLUE NOVA STAFFING 3256 E GAGE AVE $ 408.98 $ 40.90 $ 449.88 6323014010 MODERN GLASS & MIRROR WORKS 3046 E GAGE AVE $ 1,340.95 $ 134.10 $ 1,475.05 6323018017 TACOS DON CHENTE 3053 E FLORENCE AVE $ 2,763.30 $ 276.33 $ 3,039.63 6324033015 EAGLE RADIATOR SERVICE 3315 E FLORENCE AVE $ 2,264.00 $ 226.40 $ 2,490.40 Totals $ 207,452.57 $ 20,745.26 $ 228,197.83