Indian Wells City Council
April 16, 2026

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007)
§ 21.14.020. Planning Area 2 (Desert Horizons/Cook Street Area).

This predominantly residential area is divided into four (4) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section.

The southernmost portion of this planning area is within the Planning Area 12, and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45. (a) Subarea 2.1(a). This subarea has been developed in accordance with the Desert Horizons Master Plan and implemented by a conditional use approval CUP No. 2-78-1. The development is in accordance with the Very Low Density standards.

The following minimum regulations apply to development other than custom single-family units in this subarea:
(1) Setbacks.

Front Yard:
20 feet
Rear Yard:
10 feet
Side Yards Adjacent to Residential Lot.

One side:
5 feet
Other side:
11 feet
Side Yards Adjacent to Common Areas.

One side:
5 feet
Other side:
11 feet
(2) Projections.
(i) Eaves, cornices, overhangs, canopies, wing walls, fireplaces, structural appendages, and the like, which do not provide additional floor space:

Front Yard:

2.5 feet
Rear Yard:

2.5 feet
Adjacent to Residential Lot.

One side:

2.5 feet
Other side:
3 feet*
Adjacent to Common Areas.

One side:

N/A
Other side:

N/A

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(ii) Attached patio roofs and similar structures having open, unwalled sides:

Front Yard:

N/A
Rear Yard:

N/A
Adjacent to Residential Lot.

One side:

N/A
Other side:
3 feet*
Adjacent to Common Areas.

One side:
to property line**
Other side:
to property line**
(iii) Pools:***
Front Yard:

N/A
Rear Yard:
3 feet
Adjacent to Residential Lot.

One side:
3 feet
Other side:
5 feet
Adjacent to Common Areas.

One side:

N/A
Other side:

N/A
Notes:
* 2.5 -foot projections into required setback area with HOA and City
-DRC approval. For projections or attached patio roofs in 11 -foot side yard, HOA approval and City-DRC approval
(patio structures not to project higher than existing structure). ** No projections permitted across property lines.
*** Distances are from property line only. Location of pool within 3 feet of property line requires HOA approval.

The following minimum regulations apply to Clubhouse and associated Courts Building:
(1) Building Setbacks.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Front:

Interior Side:

Street Side:

Rear:
(2) Projections —Horizontal.
())
20 feet
N/A
20 feet
10 feet
Covered
outdoor walkways,
vehicular porte
cochere, eaves,
cornices, overhangs,
canopies, wing walls,
fireplaces, structural
appendages, and the
like, which do not
provide additional
floor space:

Front Yard:
10 feet
Rear Yard:
5 feet
Adjacent to Residential Lot.

One side:
5 feet
Other side:
5 feet
Adjacent to Common Areas.

One side:
0 feet
Other side:
0 feet
(3)
Clubhouse Maximum Building
Height Restrictions (above
main level pad elevation;
building areas below main level
not considered stories).

Building Stories:
2 Roof Height:
31 feet
Vertical Architectural
Projections:
32 feet
Mechanical Equipment Screens:
32 feet

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(4) Courts Building Maximum
Height Restrictions.

Roof Height: 18 feet
The following minimum regulations apply to non -golf
recreational facilities owned and operated by the homeowners' association or community association for the use of its residents:
(1) Recreational uses allowed:
tennis courts, pickleball courts,
basketball hoops, similar
outdoor court uses, and pools
(includes fencing and lighting
associated with these facilities).
(2) Setbacks.

Adjacent to Desert Horizons 0 feet
Drive:

Adjacent to residential property 3 feet
lines:

Adjacent to golf use:
0 feet
(3)
Maximum Height Restrictions
(measured from court or
pool deck surface).

Court fencing:
12 feet
Court Tight poles:
21 feet
Pool fencing:
6 feet
Pool light poles:
14 feet
(4)
Front Gatehouse Maximum
Building Height
Restrictions.

Roof Height:
19 feet
Architectural Projections:
24 feet
(b) Subarea 2.1(b). The subarea has an active homeowners' association and contains Golf and Recreation Uses in accordance with Chapter 21A0 of this Title. The north -easternmost area of this subarea is zoned Watercourse and is subject to regulations in accordance with Chapter 21.46 of this Title. (c) Subarea 2.2. This multiple ownership area is zoned Very Low Density and

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Public Parks/Recreation. The setback regulations of Subarea 2.1, stated above, apply to this subarea as well.
(d) Subarea 2.3. This small subarea includes a 46 -room boutique hotel and a restaurant. The subarea is zoned Community Commercial.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 2 (DESERT HORIZONS/COOK STREET AREA) - MAP S HI -way I
@-
a JUN1 un 2114
Planning Area 2
Subarea 2.1(a)
Sw
Feel
Augustn•Drti
Warin hpr
Desert Horizons
Country Club
Desert Horizons
Country Club
Morongo
Legend
t Plamhg Area b b05rda-y
T2Ssb es 21(a)
ea 2.1(G)
SR»me 22
da6aee 23
Planning Area 2 and Subareas

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 2 (DESERT HORIZONS/COOK STREET AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR) Natural Preserve
(RVLD) Very Low Density
(RLD) Low Density
(RMD) Medium Density
(RMHD) Medium High Density
Subtotal
COMMERCIAL:
(CC) Community
Commercial
(RC) Resort Commercial
(OP) Professional Office
Subtotal
PUBLIC USE:
(PF) Public Facilities
(PP) Public Parks/
Recreation
(PA 12) Highway 111
Subtotal
OPEN SPACE:
(GR) Golf and Recreation
(COS) Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space

0.0 423.5

0.0 0.0

0.0 423.5

2.8 0.0

1.6 4.4

0.0 1.5

6.1 7.6
115.0

0.0 10.6

0.0 0.0
926.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 926.0
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
1/40

3.0 4.5

7.0 12.0
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

2.2 n.a.
n.a.
[1][2]
[3]

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZOW
PLANNING AREA 2 (DESERT HORIZONS/COOK STREET AREA) — CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
(AHO)
(SHO)
(SSAO)
Subtotal

10.6 n.a.
n.a. n.a.
446.1 926.0 2.1
Affordable Housing
Senior Housing
Special Study Area

0.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
[3]
The number of units currently approved within this designation is 460 units.

Approximately 115 acres of Planning Area 2 are designated for golf course usage by the Golf and Recreation Zone. Thus, the acreage subject to actual development in accordance with Planning Area 2 designation is Planning Area 2 acreage minus the golf and recreation zone acreage.

This area is improved with a restaurant and a 46 -room boutique hotel.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007; Ord. 701 § 2, 2016; Ord. 744 § 3, 2022) § 21.14.030. Planning Area 3 (Eldorado Country Club Area).

This gated master planned residential area is divided into three (3) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section. The entire planning area is covered by an active homeowners' association and contains Golf and Recreation uses in accordance with Chapter 21.40 of this Title.
(a) Subarea 3.1. The majority of this planning area consists of single-family detached golf course oriented units zoned Very Low Density.

The subarea, known as the Eldorado Country Club, has an active homeowners' association and contains Golf and Recreation uses in accordance with Chapter 21.40 of this Title.

This subarea is transected by the Deep Canyon Flood Channel which is zoned WC.

One portion of this subarea contains the Eldorado Cottage Estates, Lots 1-21. This area is subject to Conditional Use Permit No. 2-92-2. The cottages are a cluster development with development standards generally applicable to cluster developments, including common parking areas, walkway easements, non -uniform lot sizes and dimensions, non-standard lot sizes, and the elimination of property line walls. Additionally, the following minimum setbacks are required for the cottages:

Front yard
Rear yard
Side yard
10 feet
5 feet
5 feet
The homeowners association shall review all building additions/remodels within the reduced setback area prior to submittal to the City. (1) Front Yards. Except as otherwise specifically provided for in the following provisions, each single-family detached lot (excluding the Eldorado Cottage Estates, Lots 1-21) shall be exempt from Section 21.50.050(b) Front Yards. (i)
Locations and Heights. Walls or fences may be permitted in any front and side front (side street) building setback area for the distance of two-thirds of the street lot frontage. Planters, fountains and similar architectural amenities may be located within ten feet (10') of the front and side front (side street) property line but shall not exceed three feet (3') in height.

Mailbox stands, lights and other such isolated structures may be located within ten feet (10') of the front and side front (side street) property line but shall not exceed five feet (5') in height nor shall they exceed eighteen inches (18") in width or depth. No walls or fences exceeding six feet (6') in height shall be in any front and side front (side street) building setback

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
area. The height of any walls or fences permitted in the front and side front (side street) building setback area shall be measured from the grade at the location the wall is constructed. Notwithstanding any restrictions mentioned in this situation, walls and fences in any required setback area may not exceed six feet (6') in height, unless approved pursuant to Section

21.06.050 of this Zoning Code.
(b) Subarea 3.1(a). This subarea is zoned Very Low Density Residential. This subarea is comprised of the lots contained in Tract Map Nos. 5492 and 5493. Existing development consists of sixteen (16) single-family homes developed on postage stamp lots surrounded by common lot open space areas.

Setback standards specific to Subarea 3.1(a) are as follows:

Setback Requirement Standards for Planning Sub -Area 3.1(a) Front -yard setback
Side -yard setback
Rear -yard setback
20 feet
16 feet minimum between structures for
proposed additions
0 feet

1. A line bisecting the adjacent common lot
area will be used to maintain the
minimum separation between structures
for proposed additions.

2. Additions will not encroach into
common lot areas.

3. 4.

Additions must maintain the
architectural character and volume of the
existing residences.

A minimum of 40 feet will be maintained
between the rear of the structures.

Figure 1 depicts the application of the adopted setback standards for Subarea 3.1(a):

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Drig,;4sa,A

MAXIMUM BUILDING
AREAS

LINE BISECTING

COMMON AREA
8' SETBACK LINES

PROPERTY LINES

COMMON LET F
NOTE:

MIN. 16' BUILDING
SEPARATION REQ.
z_
FIGURE 1

COMMON LC
(c) Subarea 3.2. One portion of this subarea contains the Eldorado Cottage Estates, Lots 1-21 and Lots 1-24 of Tract 2068. This area is subject to Conditional Use Permit No. 2-92-4. The cottages are a cluster development with development standards generally applicable to cluster developments, including common parking areas, walkway easements, non -uniform lot sizes and dimensions, non-standard lot sizes, and the elimination of property line walls. Additionally, the following minimum setbacks are required for the cottages:

Front yard 10 feet
Rear yard 5 feet
Side yard 5 feet
The homeowners association shall review all building additions/remodels within the reduced setback area prior to submittal to the City. (1) Front Yards. Except as otherwise specifically provided for in the following provisions, each single-family detached lot (excluding the Eldorado Cottage Estates, Lots 1-21) shall be exempt from Municipal Code Section 21.50.050(b), Front Yards.
(i)
Locations and Heights. Walls or fences may be permitted in any front and side front (side street) building setback area for the distance of two-thirds (2/3) of the street lot frontage. Planters, fountains and similar architectural amenities may be located within ten feet (10') of the front and side front (side street) property line but shall not exceed three feet (3') in height.

Mailbox stands, lights and other such isolated structures may be located within ten feet (10') of the front and side front (side street) property line but shall not exceed five feet (5') in height nor shall they exceed eighteen inches (18") in width or depth. No walls or fences exceeding six feet (6') in height shall be in any front and side front (side street) building setback area. The height of any walls or fences permitted in the front and side front (side street) building setback area shall be measured from the grade at the location the wall is constructed. Notwithstanding any

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
restrictions mentioned in this situation, walls and fences in any required setback area may not exceed six feet (6') in height, unless approved pursuant to Section 21.06.050 of this Zoning Code.

PLANNING AREA 3 (ELDORADO COUNTRY CLUB AREA) - MAP
..
r
a
I
Key Map
ar
yl gl rs...
1 Subareas 3.2
Subareas 3.1(a)
(Tract 5492 & 5493)
Legend
r Planning Area 3 Boundary
Subarea 3.1
Subarea 3.1(a)
Subarea 3.2
=Subarea 3 -Op 3 Space
O Srbarea 3 - GR Zane
▪ Subarea 3 - WC Zone
6ro+P.CE- Irian Wells Mama9 [.ode Selwn 21 '3 23
Planning Area 3 and Subareas
FlannIng k13 3

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 3 (ELDORADO COUNTRY CLUB AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR) Natural Preserve
(RVLD) Very Low Density
(RLD) Low Density
(RMD) Medium Density
(RMHD) Medium High Density
Subtotal
COMMERCIAL:
(CC) Community
Commercial
(RC) Resort Commercial
(OP) Professional Office
Subtotal
PUBLIC USE:
(PF) Public Facilities
(PP) Public Parks/
Recreation
Subtotal
OPEN SPACE:
(GR) Golf and Recreation
(COS) Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space
Subtotal

0.0 419.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 419.0

0.0 912.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 912.0

0.0 n.a.

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
115.0
320.0

27.0 1280.0
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
1627.0 n.a.
1/40

3.0 4.5

7.5 12.0
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

2.2 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
[1]

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 3 (ELDORADO COUNTRY CLUB AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
PLANNING AREA 2046.0
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(SSAO) Special Study Area
912.0 0.4

0.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Notes:
[1]
Approximately 115 acres of Planning Area 3 are designated for golf course usage by the Golf and Recreation Zone. Thus, the acreage subject to actual development in accordance with Planning Area 3 designation is Planning Area 3 acreage minus the golf and recreation zone acreage.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 471 § 1, 2000; Ord. 520 § 2, 2002; Ord. 568 § 1, 2005; Ord.
606 § 1 2007; Ord. 632 § 1, 2009)
§ 21.14.040. Planning Area 4 (Fairway Drive/Highway 111 Area).

This planning area is made up of numerous tracts which were developed over many years. This area contains several autonomous homeowner associations, some active in planning matters and others not. There are six (6) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section. The northernmost portion of the planning area is within the Planning Area 12 and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45. (a) Subarea 4.1. This subarea encompasses a majority of the entire area and is developed with single-family detached units. The zoning in this subarea is Very Low Density.

The row of developed lots easterly of Indian Wells Lane are subject to special setback and street right-of-way standards.

This area contains many older public improvements, streets, curbs, gutters, etc. Because of this, developments in this area may be required to upgrade same. (b) Subarea 4.2. This subarea, known as Casa Dorado, is a master planned neighborhood of attached units, zoned Very Low Density, and governed by an active homeowners' association.

Existing development within this subarea exceeds that permitted in the Very Low Density zone, therefore, the structures within this subarea are "legal non- conforming uses" as to density. As such, these structures are subject to the provisions of Section 21.90.030.
(c) Subarea 4.3. This subarea, known as Dorado Villas, is a master planned neighborhood of attached units, zoned Very Low Density, and governed by an active homeowners' association.

Existing development within this subarea exceeds that permitted in the Very Low Density zone, therefore, the structures within this subarea are "legal non- conforming uses" as to density. As such, these structures are subject to the provisions of Section 21.90.030.
(d) Subarea 4.4. This subarea is zoned Low Density.
(e) Subarea 4.5. This subarea is zoned Low Density.
(f) Subarea 4.6. This subarea is zoned Low Density.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Lots 2 through 25 of Tract 31200 that abut the adjacent subdivisions on Zuni Road and Camino Del Rey have specific rear yard setbacks that are more restrictive than the minimum established by the zoning code for single-family residential developments. These restrictions are recorded against these properties and are as follows:

Lots 2 through 25 - Set Back
Front Yard
20 feet
Rear Yard
23 feet
Side Yard
8 feet
Pool Equipment Rear Yard Setback
23 feet
(g)
Subarea 4.7. The Province at Indian Wells — Tract 32880. This subarea is zoned Residential Very Low Density and Low Density. The maximum number of lots allowed is 133 on 42.9 acres with an overall density of 3.0 du/ac. (1) Maximum Height Restrictions. Building envelope height restrictions for development within Planning Subarea 4.7 shall be as indicated in the following tables for Lots 1 through 133 with exceptions for Lots 9 through 20, 21, 22, 45, 46, 69 and 70. Structures shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height from the approved pad at the minimum side or rear building setback line. The maximum building height for buildings on Lots 9 through 20, 21, 22, 45, 46, 69 and 70 shall be eighteen (18) feet in height from the approved pad grade with a maximum building height percentage of thirty percent (30%) above fifteen (15) feet.

Building Height Restrictions for Subarea 4.7 Lots 1 — 133, Excluding Lots 9 through 20, 21, 22, 45, 46, 69 & 70
Maximum Heights Maximum Building
Entry Tower/Roof Height % Above
Ridge 15'/Above 18'
Plan Elevation
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
Plan 4
Plan 5
Spanish A
20'2"
17'3"
34%
4%
Spanish B
20'3"
17'1" 27%
4%
Italian C
21'10"
17'5" 31%
8%
Spanish A
20'2"
18'1"
32%
5%
Spanish B
21'11"
18'0"
30%
8%
Italian C
21'10"
17'6" 25%
9%
Spanish A
18'7"
18'10"
34%
9%
Spanish B
18'2"
18'10"
25%
3%
Italian C
18'10"
18'10"
26%
4%
Spanish A
19'8"
19'6"
36%
5%
Spanish B
18'4"
19'6"
31%
3%
Italian C
19'7"
18'9" 25%
3%
Spanish A
19'7"
19'2" 28%
6%

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
■
Building Height Restrictions for Subarea 4.7 Lots 1 133, Excluding Lots 9 through 20, 21, 22, 45, 46, 69 & 70
Maximum Heights Maximum Building
Entry Tower/Roof Height % Above
Plan Elevation Ridge 15'/Above 18'
Spanish B 18'4" 19'2" 27% 3%
Italian C 20'5" 19'2" 27% 3%
Building Height Restrictions for Subarea 4.7 Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20
Lot Number
Maximum Building Height
Maximum Height % Above 15'
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19, 20
18' 30%
Building Height Restrictions For Subarea 4.7 Lots 21, 22, 45, 46, 69 and 70 Lot Number and Plan Maximum Building
Number Elevation Maximum Height Height % Above 15'
Lot 21, Plan 2 Spanish B
Lots 22 and 70, Plan Italian C
4 Lot 45, Plan 5 Italian C
Lot 46, Plan 4 Spanish B
Lot 69, Plan 4 Spanish A
18'
30%
18'
30%
18'
18'
18'
30%
30%
30%
(2) Building Setback Standards. Lots 1 through 133 shall comply with the following minimum building setback standards.

Minimum Setback Requirement Standards for Planning Sub -Area 4.7 Front Yard Setback
Side Front Yard Setback
Interior Side Yard Setback
20 Feet
15 Feet
5 Feet and 11 Feet (A 16 -foot minimum
between buildings must be maintained.)
Rear Yard Setback
Lots 1 through 122
Lots 123 through 133
10 Feet
15 Feet
Highway 111 Buffer Area. Structures located on Lots 113 through 122 shall be permitted to encroach ten (10) feet into the Highway 111 Buffer Area.

Pool Equipment Setbacks. Pool equipment located in the rear yard shall be set back a minimum of fifteen (15) feet for Lots 123 through 133.

Roof Style. All lots adjacent to Cook Street and Highway 111 shall be designed with a hip roof with no dormers. A hip roof is a gable roof with the ends brought together at the same pitch as the rest of the roof. Minor gable elements for homes adjacent to Cook Street and Highway 111 are permitted as

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
enhancements to the architecture of the home as approved by the Design Review Committee; however, the predominant roof elevation from Cook Street and Highway 111 shall be a hip roof.
(6) Double Property Line Walls. Double property line walls adjacent to existing residential properties shall be permitted on a case -by -case basis per approval by the City's Community Development Director; however, a solid foam barrier or similar material must be injected or placed between the two (2) walls to reduce the incidence of vermin infestation. A single property line wall is preferred over a double property line wall.

PLANNING AREA 4 (FAIRWAY DRIVE/HIGHWAY 111 AREA) - MAP
e Cove Dr

RVLD,'RLD
Subarea
rrE NleiniW& Codenr
r
DmiaiNagaie
RLD
Subarea 4.4
ENNUI
gster

1.633
et
uoszny Ep 444Y1i
Ise"'s� vIRLD ? F RLD l
SubareaL4 5w Subarea°4t6'
Subarea
Dorado
',Arnim Dr
Dorado
771:013:51ita:—
Ls I
ShOO ,o;
bil o
RVLD
Subarea 4.1
Legend
r Planning Area 4 Eiortlar,
Subarea 4.1
▪ Subarea 4.2
Subarea 4.3
= Subarea 4.4
— Subarea 4.5
Subarea 4.6
= Subarea 4.7
Planning Area 4 and Subareas
PI arming Area 4

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 4 (FAIRWAY DRIVE/HIGHWAY 111 AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR) Natural Preserve
(RVLD) Very Low Density
(RLD) Low Density
(RMD) Medium Density
(RMHD) Medium High Density
Subtotal
COMMERCIAL:
(CC) Community
Commercial
(RC) Resort Commercial
(OP) Professional Office
Subtotal
PUBLIC USE:
(PF) Public Facilities
(PP) Public Parks/
Recreation
(PA 12) Highway 111
Subtotal
OPEN SPACE:
(GR) Golf and Recreation
(COS) Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space

0.0 446.0

34.5 0.0

0.0 480.5

0.0 1,341.0
155.0

0.0 0.0
1,496.0
1/40

3.0 4.5

7.0 12.0

3.1 [1]

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

14.8 0.0

8.7 23.5

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

11.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

11.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 4 (FAIRWAY DRIVE/HIGHWAY 111 AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
Subtotal

0.0 n.a.
n.a. n.a.

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(S SAO) Special Study Area
504 1,496.0 3.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Notesrz
[1]
Subarea 4.2 currently contains 110 units on approximately 31.5 acres, which yields an average density of 3.5 DU/AC. Similarly, Subarea 4.3 currently contains 121 units on

34.5 acres, yielding 3.5 DU/AC. Thus, both subareas are non -conforming to the Very Low Density Zone which permits a maximum of 3.0 DU/AC. Because these subareas were developed before the Very Low Density Zone was adopted, the uses therein are "legal -nonconforming" uses, subject to the provisions of Section 21.90.030.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 534 § 1, 2003; Ord. 569 § 1, 2005; Ord. 589 § 1, 2006; Ord.
606 § 1, 2007)
§ 21.14.050. Planning Area 5 (Indian Wells Golf Resort Area).

This master planned resort recreation area is divided into six (6) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section. The southernmost portion of this planning area is within the Planning Area 12 and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45. For the purposes of this Section, "City -Sponsored" shall mean operated by the City or operated under a written agreement with the City, which includes, but is not limited to, a lease, concession, or management agreement.

The underlying concept of this planning area is to produce an integrated resort complex focusing on the extensive public golf course. To that end, three (3) development principles have been established as follows:

1. The integrity of the golf course shall be maintained;

2. Development within subareas 5.2 and 5.3 shall be assured accessibility to the golf facilities; and

3. Each development adjacent to the golf course within the complex shall add to the golf resort experience.
(a) Subarea 5.1. This subarea encompasses a thirty-six (36) hole golf facility and is zoned Resort Commercial and Golf and Recreation in accordance with the City's Land Use and Zoning Map. Notwithstanding section 21.40.030(d) prohibited use provisions, City -sponsored golf-themed commercial recreational activities that are accessory to the public golf course and ancillary facilities may be permitted within this subarea, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 21.06.040 and a design review approval pursuant to Chapter 21.60. Such activities may include, but are not limited to, a gamified driving range and miniature putting course facilities.

Where located on property designated Golf and Recreation, these facilities shall be sited outside a golf course play area as defined by Section 21.08.260.

This subarea is transected by the storm channel which is zoned Watercourse.
(b) Subarea 5.2. This subarea is the center of this master planned complex, the front door to the golf facilities, and is zoned Resort Commercial and Golf and Recreation in accordance with the City's Land Use and Zoning Map.

Notwithstanding section 21.40.030(d) prohibited use provisions, City golf- themed commercial recreational activities that are accessory to the public golf course and ancillary facilities may be permitted within this subarea, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 21.06.040 and a design review approval pursuant to Chapter 21.60. Such activities may include, but are not limited to, a gamified driving range and miniature putting course facilities. Where located on property designated Golf and Recreation, these

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
facilities shall be sited outside a golf course play area as defined by Section

21.08.260. Each portion of this subarea has been developed in accordance with various conditional use permits, as follows:
(1) This area (area a) is zoned Resort Commercial and is improved with the Grand Champions Hotel in accordance with conditional use permit Nos. 2-84-2 and 2000-03.
(2) This area (area b) is zoned Resort Commercial and is improved with the Renaissance Esmeralda Resort complex in accordance with conditional use permit No. 2-85-6.
(c) Subarea 5.3. This subarea is improved with public facilities, specifically City Hall, a fire station, a maintenance yard, a park and is zoned Public Facilities.

The park is zoned Public Parks/Recreation.
(d) Subarea 5.4. This subarea is zoned Resort Commercial and portions of the subarea are subject to the design and development standards contained in specific plan No. 2006-01.
(f) Subarea 5.5. This publicly owned parcel is zoned Public Parks/Recreation. The southwest portion of this subarea is within the storm channel and is zoned Watercourse.

PLANNING AREA 5 (INDIAN WELLS GOLF RESORT AREA) - MAP
PP
Subarea 55
Subarea
Keys Map
75a
Fe
SOURS Marvar( 5N.1on2114 cz�
Plannbng Area 5
r! G ino
Ricaitalazo
Subarea
Course
Indian
r
Highway
Legend
i Plannlna Area 5 Samd3y
® Subarea 5,1
- Subarea 5.2(a)
Subarea 5.2(6)
= Subarea 5,3
= Subarea 5,4
m. Subarea 5.5
Planning Area 5 and Subareas

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 5 (INDIAN WELLS GOLF RESORT AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR) Natural Preserve
(RVLD) Very Low Density
(RLD) Low Density
(RMD) Medium Density
(RMHD) Medium High Density
Subtotal
COMMERCIAL:
(CC) Community
Commercial

0.0 0.0

0.0 11.3

0.0 0.0

0.0 79.0
0 0

11.3 79.0
1/40

3.0 4.5

7.0 12.0
n.a.
(RC) Resort Commercial
(OP) Professional Office
Subtotal
PUBLIC USE:
(PF) Public Facilities
(PP) Public Parks/
Recreation

0.0 576.21

0.0 576.21
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
(PA 12) Highway 111
Subtotal
OPEN SPACE:
(GR) Golf and Recreation
(COS) Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space

4.0 1.0
253.27
258.27
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

11.a.
253.27

0.0 75.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
[1]
n.a.
n.a.

11.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 5 (INDIAN WELLS GOLF RESORT AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
Subtotal

75.0 n.a.
n.a. n.a.

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(S SAO) Special Study Area
920.78 79.0 .1

0.0 0.0

7.5 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Notes:
[1]
Approximately 253.27 acres of Planning Area 5 are designated for golf course usage by the Golf and Recreation Zone. Thus, the acreage subject to actual development in a accordance with Planning Area 5 designation is the Planning Area 5 acreage minus the golf and recreation zone acreage.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 500 § 1, 2002; Ord. 586 § 1, 2006; Ord. 597 § 1, 2007; Ord.
606 § 1, 2007)
§ 21.14.060. Planning Area 6 (Fred Waring\Cook Street Area).

This residential area is divided into three (3) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section.
(a) Subarea 6.1. This subarea is an established, gated residential community with an active homeowners' association. It was developed in accordance with CUP 2 78 2.

This subarea is zoned Very Low Density. This development contains private streets and some building footprint lots.
(b) Subarea 6.2. This undeveloped subarea extends from Fred Waring to approximately four -hundred and twelve feet (412') north of Highway 111 on the western boundary of the City and is zoned Low Density.
(c) Subarea 6.3. This undeveloped subarea is zoned Medium High Density and is designated with the Senior Housing Overlay Zone (Section 21.12.040(c)). The Senior Housing Overlay Zone indicates the City Council's intent to achieve affordable senior citizen housing on this site by the application of developer incentive programs.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 6 (FRED WARING DRIVE/COOK STREET AREA) - MAP IF

grifiTTalle D2
f
i' _ .
i
1 Key Map i
r
I
— — 1—
or
Jasmine.Vrra
y=
a?
— — —
t1 I
�{
,ti°��
�
A
a4
Verhena
Ct
'Oh.
ilit
ilei lit
-�
Subarea`6.2
Liv •_k
.

St � - _
o'
�
_
~`Ca
.�
III
chum .'•d Hory•2 l�r,:,
RVLD
Subarea '6.1
H.v SuCt-
µAI
11 i
_ii bi
C cc
*
_ q. ,�
Village
Legend
Subarea6.1
5lbarea
0 ' I =r
@EMI (ri,
Subarea 66 32
0"ila fly �-� — - —

It
n ,R, EInd an Welts Municipal Code Sedir 2114 or -:

Planning Area 6 and Subareas
Planning Aeea6

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 6 (FRED WARING/COOK STREET AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR) Natural Preserve
(RVLD) Very Low Density
(RLD) Low Density
(RMD) Medium Density
(RMHD) Medium High Density
Subtotal
COMMERCIAL:
(CC) Community
Commercial
(RC) Resort Commercial
(OP) Professional Office
Subtotal
PUBLIC USE:
(PF) Public Facilities
(PP) Public Parks/
Recreation
(PA 12) Highway 111
Subtotal
OPEN SPACE:
(GR) Golf and Recreation
(COS) Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space

0.0 0.0

0.0 11.3

0.0 0.0

0.0 79.0
1/40

3.0 4.5

7.0 12.0

11.3 79.0 n.a.

0.0 n.a.
576.21

0.0 576.21
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

4.0 1.0

7.5 12.5
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

11.a.

0.0 0.0

75.0 0.0
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
[1]
n.a.
n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 6 (FRED WARING/COOK STREET AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
Subtotal

75.0 n.a.
n.a. n.a.

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(S SAO) Special Study Area
675.01 79.0 .1

0.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Notes:

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007)
§ 21.14.070. Planning Area 7 (Miles Avenue/Washington Street Area).

This area is divided into seven (7) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section.
(a) Subarea 7.1. This area has been subdivided into two (2) subareas, as shown on the map referenced as Planning Area 7. The southernmost portion of this planning area is within the Highway 111 Overlay Zone and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45.
(1) Area (a) is zoned Medium Density and is designated with an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) and a Senior Housing Overlay (SHO) Zone. A master plan residential community has been approved for this area subject to Conditional Use Permits Nos. 2001-01 and 99-06. This area will contain a gated master planned senior affordable housing residential community with up to one hundred eighty-five (185) senior affordable housing units built around a clubhouse with recreational facilities. This subarea is within the Highway 111 Overlay Zone and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45. (2) Area (b) is zoned Resort Commercial and is subject to the design and development standards contained in Specific Plan No. 2006-01. (3)
Area (c) is currently vacant and zoned Community Commercial. (b) Subarea 7.2. This subarea is zoned Low Density. This area is a collection of several tracts developed at different times, which exhibits a clustered development pattern consistent with the Low Density Zone. This area is comprised of one hundred twenty (120) single family homes developed on irregular shaped lots, clustered around common lot open space areas. The Indian Wells Village Homes area is further defined as Subarea 7.2(a), 7.2(b), 7.2(c), and 7.2(d) as depicted in Figure 1.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 7.2(a), (b), (c) and (d) INDIAN WELLS VILLAGE HOMES MAP

ARAPAHOE VISTA
and
7 O

BLACKFOOT
r
RIVE
Q
O
Y _
��l l

CHEYENNE DRIVE
Legend
PLANNING AREA 7 (SUB AREA 7.2a)
▪ PLANNING AREA 7 (SUB AREA 7.2 b)
▪ PLANNING AREA 7 (SUB AREA 72 c)
Q PLANNING AREA 7 (SUB AREA 7.2 d)
MI(ESAVEry E
I/
\1
//
uJ
w
Z
ce
Figure 1
(1) Setback standards specific to Planning Area 7 (Subareas 7.2(a), (b), (c), (d) are as follows in the following four (4) tables):

Table 1 (7.2(a))
Arapahoe Vista, Blackfoot Drive, Cheyenne Drive, Elkhorn Trail, Dakota Trail and Miles Avenue
Front -yard setback (Existing
Carports/Garages)
Front -yard setback (Existing
Habitable Structures)
Side -yard setback
15 feet from back of curb
20 feet from back of curb
5 feet from side property line (10 feet
minimum between structures)1
Rear -yard setback 10 feet from rear property line

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Table 2 (7.2(b))
Warner Trail
Front -yard setback (Existing
Carports/Garages)
Front -yard setback (Existing
Habitable Structures)
Side -yard setback
21 feet from back of curb
21 feet from back of curb
5 feet from side property line (10 feet
minimum between structures)1
Rear -yard setback 10 feet from rear property line
Table 1 (7.2(c))
Warner Trail
Front -yard setback
Side -yard setback
Rear -yard setback
Maximum building height at setback
21 feet from property line
5 feet from side property line (10 feet
minimum between structures)1
10 feet from rear property line
16 feet
Table 1
Arapahoe Vista, Blackfoot
(7.2(d))
Drive, and Dakota Trail
Front -yard setback (Carports/
Garages)
15 feet from property line
Front -yard setback (Habitable
Structures)
20 feet from property line
Side -yard setback
5 feet from side property line (10 feet
minimum between structures)1
Rear -yard setback
10 feet from rear property line
Maximum building height at setback
16 feet
Notes:

Blockwalls not to exceed six (6) feet
in height.
(c) Subarea 7.3. This subarea is zoned Medium Density, Public Facilities, and Watercourse. The subarea is further delineated as follows:
(1) Area (a) is currently vacant and zoned Medium Density. (2) Area (b) is the Gerald Ford Elementary School, and is zoned Public Facilities. (3) Area (c) is currently vacant and zoned Public Benefit Zone.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(4) Area (d) is currently vacant, with the exception of a pump station facility, which is zoned Public Facilities.
(5)
Area (e) is the southern boundary of this subarea and is transected by the storm channel, which is zoned Watercourse.
(6) Area (f) is zoned Medium Density Residential and is subject to the design and development standards contained in Specific Plan No. 2006-01. (d) Subarea 7.4. This subarea encompasses the Southwest Community Church complex, which is zoned Community Commercial.
(e) Subarea 7.5. This subarea is zoned Resort Commercial (RC) and is further delineated as follows:
(1) Area (a) is approved for parking, sports complex support and retail commercial use subject to the permitted uses, design and development standards contained in Specific Plan No. 2007-01.
(2) Area (b) is approved for a three hundred (300) unit resort condominium hotel complex subject to the design and development standards contained in Specific Plan No. 2007-01.
(3)
Area (c) is approved for sixty-five (65) single family homes subject to the design and development standards contained in Specific Plan No. 2007-01. (f) Subarea 7.6. This subarea encompasses the Indian Wells Tennis Gardens, a sport and recreational facility specifically designed as a tennis complex, which is zoned Sports Complex (SPX).
(g)
Subarea 7.7. This subarea is currently vacant and zoned Resort Commercial (RC).

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 7 (MILES AVENUE/WASHINGTON STREET AREA)
- MAP
Uheyenrc ❑r
RC
Subarea 7.1(b)
497— --Reatsta24,
�l-
i
1� r
(
I i
Key Map
ifkk
CC
7m Subarea 7.1(c)
750
reef
SOUFGE ui0 acleP der 2110076
PF Subarea

7.3(d)
PSP�I �Iti
Subarea 7r6
"
14_ Indian�
Tenn(.(�I
RC
Subarea

7.7 Subarea
Weer
Gary
WC
5 'RAf Subarea 7.3(e)
GG
'16)
12147
Subaea 7.5(a)
Subaea 7.5(b)
Subaea 7.5(c)
u� Subaea 7.6
Subaea 7.7
elgaugmal
1LaO*ih
Legend
P Planting Area 7 Boundary Subsea 7.3(d)
Senbr_Fbushg_0eerlar Subsea 7.3(e)
Subarea 7.1(a) — Subarea 7.3(f)
Subarea 7.1(b) Subaea 7.4
— Subaea 7.1(c)
— Subaea 72
Subaea 7.3(a)
— Subaea 7.3(6)
AN Subaea 7.3(c)
RC RC
Subarea Subarea

7.5(c) 7.5(b)
wr0lNwme, rrw e htoritrhamel
Planning Area 7 and Subareas
Planning Area 7

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE.

PLANNING AREA 7 (MILES AVENUE/WASHINGTON STREET AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM

DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY

GROSS ACREAGE
MAXIMUM DUs
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR)
Natural Preserve

0.0 0.0
1/40
(RVLD)
Very Low Density

0.0 0.0

3.0 (RLD)
Low Density

46.2 208.0

4.5 [1]
(RMD)
Medium Density

38.0 266.0

7.0 (RMHD)
Medium High Density

59.7 716.0

12.0 Subtotal
143.9
1,190.0

8.3 COMMERCIAL:
(CC)
Community
Commercial

40.99 n.a.
n.a.
(RC)
Resort Commercial

70.9 n.a.
n.a.
(OP)
Professional Office

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
(SPX)
Sports Complex
133.3
n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal
245.19
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

PUBLIC USE:
(PF)
Public Facilities

15.8 n.a.
n.a.
(PP)
Public Parks/
Recreation

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal

15.8 n.a.
n.a.
n.a..

OPEN SPACE:
(GR)
Golf and Recreation

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
(COS)
Country Club Open
Space

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(WC)
Watercourse 62.2
n.a. n.a.

ZONE
PLANNING AREA 7 (MILES AVENUE/WASHINGTON STREET AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NO 1`ES
(POS)
(SHO)
Public Owned Open
Space
Subtotal

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:

Senior Housing

0.0 n.a. n.a.

62.2 n.a.
n.a. n.a.
467.1 1,190.0 3.0

21.05 147.0

7.0 [2]
Notes:

The number of units currently approved within Subarea 7.2 is 119 units.

Subarea 7.1(a) and (c): The figures shown for maximum dwelling units (DUs and density only reflect the underlying Medium Density Zone and do not include any density bonuses as may be provided by State law).

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 429 § 1, 1998; Ord. 464 §§ 2-4, 2000; Ord. 482 § 1, 2001; 492 § 1, 2001; Ord. 498 § 1, 2002; Ord. 560 § 2, 2004; Ord. 586 § 2, 2006; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007; Ord. 613 § 1, 2008; Ord. 640 § 1, 2010; Ord. 650 § 3, 2011; Ord. 671 § 2, 2013; Ord. 713 § 2, 2018)
§ 21.14.080. Planning Area 8 (Sandpiper/Indian Wells Country Club Area).

This complex multi -use planning area is divided into nine (9) subareas, as shown in the map following this Section. The northernmost portion of the planning area is within the Planning Area 12 and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45. (a) Subarea 8.1. This area is a resort/community commercial node consisting of two (2) parts:
(1) Area (a) is zoned Resort Commercial and is partially improved with two (2) resort hotels.
(2) Area (b) is zoned Community Commercial and is improved with a retail commercial center developed in accordance with conditional use permit CUP 2-88-3. The uses permitted are:
(i) Medical and sickroom equipment and supplies —sales only; (ii) Offices: executive, administrative and clerical, consultants, stockbrokers, travel agents, insurance brokers, real estate brokers, accountants, escrow, planners, attorneys, engineers, physicians, dentists, architects, and secretarial services;
(iii) Libraries;
(iv) Banks and savings and loan institutions;
(v) Pharmacies;
(vi) Florists' shops;
(vii) Book and stationery stores;
(viii) Art galleries;
(ix) Medical, dental and biological laboratories;
(x) Optometrist;
(xi) One restaurant;
(xii) Tailor shop;
(xiii) Interior design;
(xiv) Clothing shops;
(xv) Jewelry stores; and
(xvi) Cigar club, including with on -site alcohol sales.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Any use not specified in this list shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use permit, pursuant to Section 21.06.040. Unless modified by a variance, the Community Commercial (Chapter 21.30) development standards shall be in effect.

No building shall be constructed with a setback of less than fifty feet (50') on Highway 111 and thirty feet (30') from the curb line on Club Drive, from any existing or contemplated street or highway including unimproved rights -of -way.

The City Council shall approve all elevations of new buildings.

The following development plans, and any subsequent changes, shall be approved by the Design Review Committee (DRC):
(i) Complete landscape plan;
(ii) Trash storage and collection; and
(iii) Plans for exterior lighting of the development.
(b) Subarea 8.2. This established residential area consists of a series of interrelated cluster -type developments, and is zoned Very Low Density. The subarea is governed by an active homeowners' association.

Existing development within this subarea exceeds that permitted in the Very Low Density Zone, therefore, the structures within this subarea are "legal non- conforming uses" as to density. As such, these structures are subject to the provisions of Section 21.90.030.
(c) Subarea 8.3. This is zoned Very Low Density. The pump station adjacent to Manitou Drive is zoned Public Facilities. The properties south of Iroquois Drive, which about the flood channel, contain various easements in reference to the channel. (d) Subarea 8.4. This established area contains the Indian Wells Country Club area and is transected by the Deep Canyon Flood Channel, which is zoned Watercourse. The area is further delineated as follows:
(1) Area 8.4(a).The residential portion of the Indian Wells Country Club area is zoned Very Low Density and contains the Deep Canyon Flood Channel zoned Watercourse.
(2) Area 8.4(b). The golf course and related golf and recreational facilities portion of the Indian Wells Country Club area contains Golf and Recreation uses in accordance with Chapter 21.40 of this Title. (e) Subarea 8.5. This portion of the Indian Wells Country Club complex differs from the remaining portions in that, while it is zoned Very Low Density, it contains a series of attached units in clusters which were approved as planned unit developments by several conditional use permits and tract maps.

Subarea 8.6. This subarea, located at the base of the mountain, is privately owned, deed restricted property and is zoned Country Club Open Space.

Subarea 8.7. This mountainous subarea is publicly owned and zoned Public Owned

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Open Space.
(h) Subarea 8.8. This mountainous subarea is privately owned and zoned Natural Preserve.
(i)
Subarea 8.9. This subarea is zoned Low Density and Professional Office, consistent with approved and existing development. The subarea is further delineated as follows:
(1) Subarea 8.9(a). This subarea is zoned Residential Low Density, consistent with approved and existing development.
(2) Subarea 8.9(b). This subarea is zoned Professional Office, in accordance with Conditional Use Permit 2-97-2.
(j) Sub -area 8.10 and 8.11. This master planned residential community, known as the Ryan Golf Course, is built around a 36 -hole golf course in accordance with an approved Conditional Use Permit, CUP No. 99-1 and 2-90-5. It is zoned Very Low Density, and is bounded on the south by the Deep Canyon Flood Channel, which is zoned Watercourse, Highway 111 to the north, which is zoned Highway 111 Overlay, Planning Area 1 to the east which is zoned Very Low Density, and Planning subarea 8.3 to the west, which is zoned Very Low Density.

Internally, the Ryan Golf Course Community is divided into two (2) development areas with net densities ranging from just over 1.4 du/acre.

Development within this country club area is governed by the zoning, the approved Conditional Use Permit, the applicable tract map(s), and any active homeowner association(s). Persons interested in development within this area should research all of these sources.

PLANNING AREA 8.10 AND 8.11 (IWCC - RYAN COURSE) - CHART

GROSS MAXIMUM AVERAGE
ZONE ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY DENSITY
RVLD
Golf and
Recreatio
n
Total

35.55 85 3.0 .42 du/ac

65.08 100.63 85 1.2 du/ac
(1) General Development Standards. Except as otherwise specifically provided for in the following provisions, the development standards of the Very Low Density Residential Zone (RVLD), Golf and Recreation Zone (GR), Country Club Open Space Zone (COS), and Watercourse Zone (WC) shall apply. (2) Development Density. The Project may be permitted to be developed to a density not to exceed an overall density of 0.42 units per acre for the entire project.
(3) (Sub -Area 8.10) Sub -Area 8.10 - Lot Arrangement. Except as otherwise specifically provided, lots 57 through 74 per Tentative Tract 29502 within the Project shall be exempt from Section 20.72.010(a), Minimum Size and Depth of Lots, Section 20.72.010(b), Depth Requirements, and Section 20.72.020,

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(5)
Side Lines.
(4) Irregular Lots. Lots which are irregularly shaped and located on a curve or cul- de-sac street shall have a lot width of thirty-five feet (35') at the front property line or meet the required minimum lot width at the Front Building Setback Line [FBSL].

Development Standards for Development Areas. Minimum development standards for development areas within Ryan Golf Course, as identified in Planning Area 8.10 and Sub -area 8.11 — Table, shall be as follows:
(i) Minimum Lot Area Standards. The minimum area requirements for development Sub -areas 8.10 and 8.11 are as follows:

Type
Development Standards Minimum Width/Depth
Area Lot Size Set Backs
RVLD — Lots
(55-70)
12,000 Sq. Ft. min. 86'x140' Min.

RVLD—Lots 12,000 Sq. Ft. min.
(1-54) and
(71, 83-85)
RVLD — Lots 12,000 Sq. Ft. min.
(72-82)
Golf and 3,000 Sq. Ft. max.

Golf House
(Lot 86)
100'x100' min.
100'x100' min.

N/A
Front — 20'
Side — 10'x6'min/
8'x8' min
(multiple of 16')
Rear — 10'
Side front (corner
lots) 15'
Front — 20'
Side — 8'x8'
Rear — 10'
Side front (corner
lots) 15'
Front — 20'
Side — 8'x8'
Rear — 20'
Side front (corner
lots) 15'
Front — 20'
Side — 8'x8'
Rear — 10'
Side front (corner
lots) 15'
(ii) Maximum Building Height. The maximum
building height for development Sub Areas 8.10 and

8.11 are as follows:

Type
Development Standards Maximum Height
Height
RVLD — lots (55-70)
12' at side and rear yard setback line. 18'
maximum height
RVLD — Lots (1-54)&(71-85)
12' at side and rear yard setback line. 18'
maximum height
Golf Lot (87)
No Buildings permitted
(A) Buildings and structures shall not have a height exceeding eighteen feet (18'). In no case shall the building exceed one (1)

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
living story above the approved pad elevation of the building site.
(B) Structures shall not exceed twelve feet (12') in height at the side or rear setback line. [see Sections 21.23.070(b)(1) and

21.23.070(b)(3)].
(C) In no case shall the building exceed one (1) living story above the approved pad elevation of the building site.
(D) Structures shall have only forty (40) percent of the total roof area exceed fifteen feet (15') in height to a maximum of eighteen feet (18') from the approved pad grade.
(iii) Roof Slope. Building envelope height restrictions as specified in Zoning Code Sections 21.23.070(b)(1), 21.23.070(b)(2) and 21.23.070(b)(3), shall be enforced. Modifications shall be only be permitted on a Development Area basis and not for each individual lot. (iv) Golf House (Lot 86). Property development standards for the Indian Wells Country Club Golf House (Lot 86) shall be as follows:
(A) Golf House (Lot 86) shall not exceed twelve feet (12') in height at the side or rear building setback line. [see Sections 21.23.070(b)(1) and 21.23.070(b)(3)].
(B) In no case shall the Golf House (Lot 86) exceed one (1) living story above the approved pad elevation of the building site.
(C) Golf House (Lot 86) shall have no more than sixty (60) percent of the total roof area exceed fifteen feet (15') in height. (D) In no case shall the roof height of the Golf House (Lot 86) exceed twenty-one feet (21') from approved pad grade nor shall the tower element exceed of twenty-eight feet ten inches (28' 10") from approved pad grade.
(E) Except as otherwise specifically provided in the above provisions, development standards and requirements of the Very Low Density Residential Zone (RVLD) with a Golf and Recreation Zone (GR) shall apply.
(k) Subarea 8.12. This subarea is currently a vacant city -owned parcel zoned Golf and Recreation.
(1) LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
(m) LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.
(n) LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Subarea 8.1(a)
MrilearOM
(o) LEFT IN1'LNTI0NALLY BLANK.
(p) Planning Area 8 (Sandpiper/Indian Wells Country Club Area) Map PLANNING AREA 8 (SANDPIPER/INDIAN WELLS COUNTRY CLUB AREA) - MAP

RC F CC -
Subarea 8.1(6)1 Po
elite
_ Subarea 8.9(6) RVLD
D Subarea 8.10
d RVL
Su hare" a 8r9(5Yel O- a •
IndianWells
Country Club
SOiJRCE Muncipal Code Section 2114 ND
Planning Area 8
peep Canyon storm Channel
Tw-
GR
Subarea 8.12
Legend
i PA 8 Boundary Subarea 8.6
Subarea S.1(a) Subarea 83
Subarea S.1(b) Subarea 8.8
Subarea 8.2 Subarea 8.9(a)
Subarea 8.3 Subarea 8.9(b)
Subarea 8.4(a) Subarea 8.10
Subarea 8.4(b) Subarea 8.11
Subarea 8.5 Subarea 8.12
Planning Area 8 and Subareas

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 8 (SANDPIPER/INDIAN WELLS COUNTRY CLUB AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM

DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR)
Natural Preserve
147.3

4.0 1/40
(RVLD)
Very Low Density
226.5

80.0 3.0
[1][2]
(RLD)
Low Density

24.7 111.0

4.5 (RMD)
Medium Density

0.0 0.0

7.0 (RMHD)
Medium High Density

0.0 0.0

12.0 Subtotal
398.5
191.0
.05
COMMERCIAL:
(CC)
Community
Commercial

6.0 n.a.
n.a.
{3}
(RC)
Resort Commercial

20.3 n.a.
n.a.
(OP)
Professional Office

1.5 n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal

27.8 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

PUBLIC USE:
(PF)
Public Facilities

0.4 n.a.
n.a.
(PP)
Public Parks/
Recreation

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal

0.4 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
(GR)
(COS)
OPEN SPACE:

Golf and Recreation
200
n.a.
n.a.

Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space
235.1
n.a.
n.a.

50.0 n.a. n.a.
1,531.1
n.a. n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONg
PLANNING AREA 8 (SANDPIPER/INDIAN WELLS COUNTRY CLUB AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
Subtotal
1,816.2 n.a.
n.a. n.a.

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
2,242.9
191.0 0.1
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(SSAO) Special Study Area

0.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Note;
[1]
[2]
[3]
Subarea 8.2 currently contains 224 units on approximately 61.0 acres, which yields an average density of 3.6 DU/AC. Thus, this subarea is non -conforming to the Very Low Density Zone which permits a maximum of 3.0 DU/AC. Because this subarea was developed before the Very Low Density Zone was adopted, the uses therein are "legal non -conforming" uses, subject to the provisions of Section 21.90.030.

Approximately 200 acres of this Planning Area 8 are designated for golf course usage by the Golf and Recreation Zone. Thus, the acreage subject to actual development in accordance with the Planning Area 8 designation is the Planning Area 8 acreage minus the golf and recreation zone acreage.

Refer to Section 21.14.080(a) for permitted uses and development requirements.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 472 § 1, 2000; Ord. 521 § 1, 2002; Ord. 522 §§ 3, 4, 2002,
Ord. 606 § 1, 2007; Ord. 665 § 2, 2013)
§ 21.14.090. Planning Area 9 (Toscana Area).

This Planning Area is divided into three (3) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section.
(a) Area (a) is the Southern California Edison power substation and is zoned Public Facilities.
(b) Area (b) is the Whitewater River Storm Channel and is zoned Watercourse. (c) Area (c) contains a gated master planned community, known as The Toscana Country Club, built around a thirty-six (36) hole golf course and clubhouse facility in accordance with an approved modification to Conditional Use Peiiiiit (CUP No. 2000-01). This subarea is zoned Very Low Density and contains golf and recreations uses in accordance with Chapter 21.40 of this Title. Development within this subarea is governed by the area's particular zoning district, approved conditional use permit, applicable tract map(s), and active homeowners' association. Persons interested in development within this area should research all of these sources. (1) Except as otherwise specifically provided for in the following provisions, the development standards of the Very Low Density Residential Zone (RVLD) and Golf and Recreation Zone (GR) shall apply.
(i)
Development Density. Development within this subarea shall not exceed a maximum of six hundred sixty (660) fee simple residential dwelling units for the entire subarea.
(ii) Irregular Lots. Lots which are irregularly shaped and located on a curve or cul-de-sac street shall have a lot width of greater than thirty-five (35) feet at the front property line or meet the required minimum lot width at the Front Building Setback Line (FBSL).
(iii) Minimum Lot Area Standards. Minimum lot area standards within the Toscana Country Club shall conform to applicable general lot area standards except as may be provided in an unexpired development agreement.
(iv) Minimum Building Setback Restrictions. Minimum building setback requirements for development within The Toscana Country Club shall be as follows:

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Development
Type Front
Setbacks
Interior Side Rear Side Street Garage Door
security
(gatehouses)
20'
15'
15'
15'
20'
club house, pro
shop and other
recreational
facilities
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
golf courses
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
type "A" lots
20'
8'
10'
15'
20'
type "B" lots
20'
8'
10'
15'
20'
type "C" lots
20'
8'
10'
15'
20'
type "D" lots
20'
8'
10'
15'
20'
type "E" lots
20'
8'
10'
15'
20'
(v) Maximum Height Restrictions. Building envelope height restrictions for development within the Toscana Country Club shall be as follows:

Building Envelope Height Restrictions
Development Type:

Maximum Building
Height
Roof Slope
Restrictions
Horizontal Roof
Restrictions
golf locker room/golf
cart storage
42' / 24' '0
none
(s]
club house
46' / 28' 6" [`][33
none `61
pro shop 30' / 21' 'I
none °1
grille pavilion
32' / 20' [°[2l
none
['1
sports club 44' / 24' [13[21 none "1
golf course
maintenance facility
15' X21
none
security (gatehouses) 25' g1 none none
type "A" lots
19' [21
[4][91 [81
type "B" lots 20' al [41[91 [81
type "C" lots 21' [21 C41[9] [8
type "D" lots 21' [21 [41[9] [81
type "E" lots 19' [21 [41[9] [81
Notes:
[1]
[2]
{3]
Maximum tower height/maximum building
height allowed.

In no case shall the building exceed one (1)
living story above the approved pad elevation of
the building site.

In no case shall the building exceed two (2)
living stories above the approved pad elevation
of the building site.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Notes:
[4]
[9]
Structures shall not exceed 16' in height at the
side or rear building setback line. The maximum
building height shall not be allowed within 20'
of any side property line; 20' of any rear
property line; 20' of any front property line.

No more than 20% of the horizontal roof area
shall exceed 22' in height.

No more than 20% of the horizontal roof area
shall exceed 30' in height.

No more than 20% of the horizontal roof area
shall exceed 22' in height.

No more than 20% of the horizontal roof area
shall exceed 18' in height, and no more than
45% of the horizontal roof area shall exceed 15'
in height.

Buildings shall not exceed the height
established by the planes between the maximum
building height allowed at the minimum side
and rear building setbacks and the maximum
building height allowed at the minimum
building setbacks for the maximum building
height, [4], above.
(A) Building Height Restrictions. Building envelope height restrictions as specified in Section 21.12.090(c)(v) may be modified.

Modifications shall only be permitted on a "development type" basis and not for each individual lot. Modification of any development type building envelope height restriction shall be reviewed and approved and incorporated into the project's approved conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of Section

21.06.040(c)(1).
(vi) Property Line Walls. Property line walls may be constructed along the rear and side lot lines within the rear yard building setback subject to the following standards:
(A) A wall along the rear lot line abutting the golf course shall not exceed three (3) feet in height.
(B) A wall along the side lot line may extend into the rear yard building setback, provided that beginning no less than ten (10) feet from the rear property line the wall shall step down in height from a maximum six (6) feet to a maximum of four (4) feet in at least three (3) equally spaced steps.
(vii) Building Appendages and Projections. Development within this subarea shall be in accordance with Section 21.20.100 media niches that are attached or unattached to a fireplace and do not exceed twelve (12) feet in width.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(viii) Required Screening Walls. Screening walls shall be required in accordance with Section 21.50.050 except when the following criteria are met:
(A) When only one (1) air conditioning compressor is located adjacent to an accessory living structure or garage; and
(B) The air conditioning compressor is located a minimum of ninety (90) feet from the rear property line.

PLANNING AREA 9 (TOSCANA AREA) - MAP
RVLD
Subarea 90)
WC
Subarea 9(6)
�PF Subarea 9(a)
tianealt Ira
---RoltCL7m
'Toscana
CounU4 Club
V, Amapa' GOUe nclen21. 14J3.:

Planning Me 9
Legend
C. Plann hg Area 9 Boundary Subarea 9(c) - RAD
Subarea 9(a) - PF r• Subarea 9(c) - GR.

Subarea 9(b) - WC
Planning Area 9 and Subareas

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs
PLANNING AREA 9 (TOSCANA AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM

DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR)
Natural Preserve

0.0 0.0
1/40
(RVLD)
Very Low Density
615.0
660.0

3.0 (RLD)
Low Density

0.0 0.0

4.5 (RMD)
Medium Density

0.0 0.0

7.0 (RMHD)
Medium High Density

0.0 0.0

12.0 Subtotal
615.0
660.0

1.073
COMMERCIAL:
(CC)
Community
Commercial

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
(RC)
Resort Commercial

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
(OP)
Professional Office

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

PUBLIC USE:
(PF)
Public Facilities

5.0 n.a.
n.a.
(PP)
Public Parks/
Recreation

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal

5.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
(GR)
(COS)
OPEN SPACE:

Golf and Recreation
413.24
n.a.
n.a.

Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

20.0 n.a. n.a.

0.0 n.a. n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONg
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs
PLANNING AREA 9 (TOSCANA AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM

DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
Subtotal

20.0 11.a. n.a. n.a.

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
640.0 660.0 1.03
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(SSAO) Special Study Area

10.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 485 § 1, 2001; Ord. 541 § 1, 2003; Ord. 601 § 1, 2007; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007; 610 § 1, 2008; Ord. 655 § 1, 2011; Ord. 662 § 1, 2012)
§ 21.14.100. Planning Area 10 (Villages I and II/Village Plaza/Wall Street West).

Ord.

Villages I and II are two (2) retail commercial/professional office complexes located on opposite sides of Highway 111, west of Cook, which were developed by the same developer and are similar in use and character. Each development is a subarea within the Planning Area, as shown on the map following this Section. The property west of Village I is the professional office development named Wall Street West. The property west of Village II is a retail commercial/professional office development named Village Plaza. Because this Planning Area is transected by Highway 111, it is within the Planning Area 12 and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45.

The uses permitted, signage allowed and vehicular access permitted are all stringently regulated by the applicable Conditional Use Permits and zoning which govern these properties and persons interested in these properties should pay particular attention to same.
(a) Subarea 10.1 [Village I]. This area is improved with the Village I retail complex. It was approved in accordance with Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2-79-4, and is zoned Community Commercial.
(b) Subarea 10.2 [Village II]. This area is improved with the Village 2 retail/office complex. It was approved in accordance with Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2- 86-4, and is zoned Community Commercial.

The uses permitted in this subarea are those approved in Use Permit No. 9 88- 1:
(1) Retail Building: Antiques, apparel —women's; apparel —men's; apparel — infants; appliance store —sales only; art gallery; artificial plants/ trees; beauty shop; beauty supplies; camera store; candy store —boxed candy only; cards and gifts; computer store —sales only; consumer electronics —sales only; fabric store; flower shop; glassware; hobby shop; jewelry; kitchen store; linens and bedding; luggage shop; needlepoint shop; nursery products —No outside sales; optical; wallpaper; party supplies; pet supplies —no pets; pharmacy; portrait studio; sewing center —sales only; shoe repair; shoe store; sporting goods; and toy store.
(2) Office Building: Administrative, executive, clerical offices, consultants, stockbrokers, travel agents, insurance brokers, real estate brokers, accountants, escrow offices, attorneys, dentists and physicians, architects, planners and engineers.
(3) Financial Buildings: Banks and financial institutions. (c) Subarea 10.3 [Wall Street West]. This subarea was approved in accordance with

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2-91-2 and is zoned Professional Office. Access to this area is restricted to a single access point on Highway 111 and will be limited to right -turn -in and right -turn -out due to the proposed median in Highway 111.

Additional access is available to the east via the Village I property. This subarea is also within the Planning Area 12 and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45.

The uses permitted in this subarea are those listed below as defined in Section 21.36.040:
(1) Office Building: Government facilities, manufactured structures, museum and art galleries, administrative offices, business offices, professional offices, recreational facilities, utility buildings and facilities, and non-commercial banks.
(d) Subarea 10.4 [Village Plaza]. This subarea is zoned Community Commercial has developed in phases under Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Nos. 2-95-1 and 2-96-3.

This subarea is also within the Planning Area 12 and is subject to the requirements of Chapter 21.45.

The buildings defined in this area conform to the Master Development Plan approved under CUP No. 2-95-1. The uses permitted in this subarea are those listed below as defined in CUP Nos. 2-95-1 and 2-96-3:
(1) Building 1 (Office): Government facilities, manufactured structures, museum and art galleries, administrative offices, business offices, professional offices, recreational facilities, utility buildings and facilities, and non-commercial banks.
(2) Building 2 (Office): Government facilities, manufactured structures, museum and art galleries, accounting offices, administrative offices, attorney offices, business offices, professional offices, clerical offices, dentist and physician offices, escrow offices, architect and planning offices, consultant offices, insurance offices, real estate brokers, recreational facilities, stock brokers, travel agents, utility buildings and facilities, and non-commercial banks. (5)
Building 5 (Banks and Financial Institutions): Financial uses (banks, financial institutions and non-commercial banks).

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 10 (VILLAGE I AND II/HIGHWAY 111 AREA) - MAP i
Key Map
"IP"
Village C-
5- rping - U
Centerill'Ati
'AIM, Is �?,
V:Ilaye
Shopping
liar At Ind, 3,1
VUeIIs
Gefeatalia`-
100 200
Fee1
Klamath Dr
999 11
- Eureka Burger
lanmacy
Legend
i Planning Area 10 Boundary 111 Subarea 10.3
Subarea 10.1 = Subarea 10.4
Subarea 10.2
SOURCE Indian Well; Municipal Code Section 21 14100
Planning Area 10 and Subareas
Planning Area 10

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 10 (VILLAGE I AND II/HIGHWAY 111 AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM

DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR)
Natural Preserve

0.0 0.0
1/40
(RVLD)
Very Low Density

0.0 0.0

3.0 (RLD)
Low Density

0.0 0.0

4.5 (RMD)
Medium Density

0.0 0.0

7.0 (RMHD)
Medium High Density

0.0 0.0

12.0 Subtotal

0.0 0.0

0.0 COMMERCIAL:
(CC)
Community
Commercial

28.1 n.a.
n.a.
(RC)
Resort Commercial

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
(OP)
Professional Office

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal

28.1 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

PUBLIC USE:
(PF)
Public Facilities

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
(PP)
Public Parks/
Recreation

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
(PA 12)
Highway 111

2.9 n.a.
n.a.
(GR)
(COS)
(WC)
Subtotal
OPEN SPACE:

Golf and Recreation
Country Club Open
Space
Watercourse

2.9 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

0.0 n.a. n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 10 (VILLAGE I AND II/HIGHWAY 111 AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM

DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs
NOTES
(POS)
Public Owned Open
Space

0.0 n.a.
n.a.

Subtotal

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
31 0.0

0.0 OVERLAY ZONES:
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(SSAO) Special Study Area

0.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a. n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 403 § 3 Exhibit A, 1997; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007) § 21.14.110. Planning Area 11 (Vintage/Living Desert/Hidden Valley Area). (a) Subareas. This planning area is divided into three (3) subareas, as shown on the map following this Section.
(1) Subarea 11.1. This gated master planned residential community, known as the Vintage Country Club, is built around a thirty -six -hole golf course in accordance with an approved Conditional Use Permit, CUP No. 2-78-7. It is zoned Very Low Density, and is bounded on the south by the Deep Canyon Flood Channel, which is zoned Watercourse, and the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains, which are zoned Public Owned Open Space. Water reservoirs located in the southwestern portion of the subarea are zoned Public Facilities.

Subarea contains golf and recreation uses in accordance with Chapter 21.40 of this Title.

Internally, the Vintage Country Club project is divided into seventeen (17) development areas with net densities ranging from just over 2 du/acre to the three-story terrace condominiums at 10 du/acre.

Development within this country club area is governed by the zoning, the approved Conditional Use Permit, the applicable tract maps, and an active homeowners' association. Persons interested in development within this area should research all of these sources.
(2) Subarea 11.2. This subarea extends southeasterly into the mountains to the southernmost boundary of the City. This area is zoned Public Owned Open Space with the exception of two (2) flood corridors zoned Watercourse, and water reservoirs zoned Public Facilities.

The northwestern portion of this Subarea contains the Living Desert Wildlife & Botanical Park. Established in 1970 as a non-profit education and conservation center, the 1,200 acre park lies within both the Cities of Palm Desert and Indian Wells. The Eagle Canyon and African Savannah Village exhibits are within the municipal boundaries of the City of Indian Wells and are subject to the requirements of Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2-90-6 and 2-97-1.
(3)
Subarea 11.3. This gated master planned community, known as the Reserve at Hidden Valley, is planned around a private 21 -hole golf course and clubhouse facility in accordance with an approved Conditional Use Permit, CUP No. 2-92-5. This subarea is zoned Very Low Density and is transected by several flood control corridors which are zoned Watercourse. The most easterly portion of this area abuts the Santa Rosa Mountains, and is zoned Country Club Open Space. Subarea contains golf and recreation uses in accordance with Chapter 21.40 of this Title.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
The subarea designations shown on the map following this Section are conceptual only. Land use designations [WC, RVLD, or GR] may be altered if subsequent land use analysis indicates that an environmentally superior plan would result.
(b) General Development Standards. Except as otherwise specifically provided for in the following provisions, the development standards of the Very Low Density Residential Zone (RVLD), Golf and Recreation Zone (GR), Country Club Open Space Zone (COS), and Watercourse Zone (WC) shall apply. (1) Development Density. The Project may be permitted to be developed to a density not to exceed an overall density of 0.63 units per acre for the entire project and not to exceed a maximum of sixty-six (66) units within a development cluster (area of similar lot/housing types) (2) Attached and Zero -Setback Dwellings. Dwelling units which are attached to one another or which are offset on the legal lot upon which they are built so as to have one (1) or more exterior wall located upon a property line may be permitted within the Project. Property standards (i.e. lot area, lot dimensions and yards) for attached, zero -setback and similar development approaches shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and incorporated into the Project's approved Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the provisions of Section 21.06.040(c)
Condominium Development. Condominium residential development may be permitted upon approval by the City Council subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the provisions of Section

21.20.110.
(3)
(4) Lot Arrangement. Except as otherwise specifically provided, each lot within the Project shall be exempt from Section 20.72.010(a), Minimum Size and Depth of Lots, Section 20.72.010(b), Depth Requirements, and Section

20.72.020, Side Lines.

Irregular Lots. Lots which are irregularly shaped and located on a curve or cul- de-sac street shall have a lot width of thirty-five (35) feet at the front property line or meet the required minimum lot width at the Front Building Setback Line [FBSL].
(6) Development Standards for Development Areas. Minimum development standards for development areas within the Reserve, as identified in Planning Area 11, Subarea 11.3 - Table, shall be as follows:
(5)
(i) Minimum Lot Area Standards. The minimum area requirements for development areas within the Reserve are as follows:

DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM LOT:

TYPE
AREA SIZE (SQ. FT.) WIDTH/ DEPTH
Sales and Security
Bungalows
1, lA
none none
2 6,000 50'/80'

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM LOT:

TYPE
AREA SIZE (SQ. FT.) WIDTH/ DEPTH
Casitas 3
Villas 4
Reserve Lots 5
Hidden Valley Estates 6, 6A, 6B
Estate Lots 7
Club House and other 8
Recreational Facilities
Golf Course 9
maintenance facility
6,000
6,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
none
50'/80'
50'/80'
607100'
60'/100'
60'/100'
none
none none
(ii) Minimum Building Setback Restrictions. Minimum building setback requirements for development areas with the Reserve are as follows:

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Development Type
Development Area
Front
Interior Side
Rear
Setbacks
Side Street
Garage Door
Sales and Security
1, 1A
20'
15'
15'
15'
20'
Bungalows
2 20'
Lots having less than
90' in width at front
property line: 5'
Lots 90' or more in
width at front property
line: 8'
10'
15'
20'
Casitas
3 20'
Lots having less than
90' in width at front
property line 12' (no
less than 5' on one
side).

Lots 90' or more in
width at front property
line: 8'
10'
15'
20'
Villas
4 20'
10'
10'
15'
20'
Reserve Lots
5 20'
8'
10'
15'
20'
Hidden Valley Estates
6 20'
12'
10'
15'
20'
Hidden Valley Estates
6A
20'
12'
10'
15'
20'
Hidden Valley Estates
6B
20'
8'
10'
15'
20'
Estate Lots
7 20'
12'
10'
15'
20'
Club House and other
Recreational Facilities
8 20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
Golf Course maintenance
facility
9 20'
20'
20'
20'
20'

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Notes:

Side street setback for corner lots.
(iii) Minimum Height Restrictions. Building envelope height restrictions for Development Areas within The Reserve are as shown in the table on the following page:

Development Type
Development Area Maximum Building Roof Slope
(DA) Height in Stories (feet) Restrictions
Horizontal Roof Area
Limits
Walls
Property Line
Other
Sales and Security 1, lA 1 (18')'
Bungalows 2 1 (18')'
Casitas 3 1 (18')'
Villas 4 1 (18')'
Reserve Lots 5 1 (18')'
Hidden Valley Estates 6 1 (24')5
Hidden Valley Estates 6A 1 (241)8
Hidden Valley Estates 6B 1 (18')'
Estate Lots 7 1 (24')5
Club House and other 8 2 (40')2
Recreational Facilities Clubhouse
1 (18')'
Other Facilities
Golf Course Maintenance 9 Single Story9
Facility
yes'
yes6
yes'
yes'
yes'
yes"
yes"
yes'
yes"
no
yes'
no
yes'
yes'2
yes'2
yes'
yes'
yes"
yeS'3
yes'
yes"
no
yes'
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes"
yes15, 16
yeS'5
yes"
yes'
yeS'5
yes"
yes'
yes'
yeS'4
yes"
no yes"
Notes:
2 Buildings and structures shall not have a height exceeding eighteen feet (18'). In no case shall the building exceed one (1) living story above the approved pad elevation of the building site.

Clubhouse shall not have a height exceeding forty feet (40'). In no case shall the building exceed two (2) living stories above the approved pad elevation of the building site.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Notes:
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 Structures shall not exceed twelve feet (12') in height at the side or rear setback line. The maximum building height shall not be allowed within twenty-six feet (26') of the side property line, thirty-two feet (32') of the rear property line, or twenty feet (20') of the front property line [see Sections 21.23.070(b)(1) and 21.23.070(b)(3)].

Structures shall have only 30% of the total roof area exceed fifteen feet (15") in height to a maximum of eighteen feet (18')from the approved pad grade [see Section

21.23.070(a)].

Buildings and structures shall not have a height exceeding twenty-four feet (24'). In no case shall the building exceed one (1) living story above the approved pad elevation of the building site.

Structures shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height at the side or rear setback line. The maximum building height shall not be allowed within thirteen feet (13') of the side property line, sixteen feet (16') of the rear property line, or twenty feet (20') of the front property line.

Structures shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height at the side or rear setback line. The maximum building height shall not be allowed within thirteen feet (13') of the side property line, twenty-four feet (24') of the rear property line, or twenty feet (20') of the front property line.

Where a line -of -sight demonstrates that buildings and structures are not visible from The Vintage Country Club or The Living Desert, the maximum height of a proposed structure shall not exceed twenty-four feet (24'). In no case shall the building exceed one (1) living story above the approved pad elevation of the building site.

In no case shall the building exceed one (1) living story above the approved pad elevation of the building site.

Structures shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height at the side or rear setback line. The maximum building height shall not be allowed within twenty feet (20') of the side property line, thirty-two feet (32') of the rear property line, or twenty feet (20') of the front property line.

Structures shall not exceed sixteen feet (16') in height at the side or rear setback line. The maximum building height shall not be allowed within twenty-six feet (26') of the side property line, thirty-two feet (32') of the rear property line, or twenty feet (20') of the front property line.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
12 Structures shall have only forty (40) percent of the total roof area exceed fifteen feet (15') in height to a maximum of eighteen feet (18') from the approved pad grade.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Notes:
13 14
15 16
Structures shall have only forty (40) percent of the total roof area exceed fifteen feet (15') in height to a maximum of twenty-four feet (24') from the approved pad grade.

Walls and fences may be used to enclose facilities that are adjacent to existing or anticipated urban development, but shall not be permitted in locations which will restrict obvious wildlife movement, unless such wall/fence has been designed by a qualified biologist to allow wildlife movement to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.

Walls and fences may be used to enclose the "island of development within a parcel," but shall not be permitted along property boundaries of the individual residential lot.

Immediately surrounding the residential structure may be small, walled -in yard areas.

Barriers (walls) between parcels, for privacy courtyards or other small walled -in yard areas, may be permitted within the bungalows if lots are clustered in groups of four with unrestricted open space areas between each cluster. Open space areas between each cluster must be designed by a qualified biologist to allow wildlife movement to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(A) Roof Slope. Building envelope height restrictions as specified in Zoning Code Sections 21.23.070(a), 21.23.070(b)(1),

21.23.070(b)(2) and 21.23.070(b)(3), and Section

21.14.110(b)(6)(iii) may be modified to fit the development conditions. Modifications shall be only be permitted on a Development Area basis and not for each individual lot.

Modifications of any Development Area building envelope height restrictions shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and incorporated into the projects approved Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the provisions of Section

21.06.040(c)(1).

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 11 (THE VINTAGE CLUB) - MAP
Map
Etonada
Ironwood
L
giliZa7C17
--1 Subarea
Vintage Country,Clubm
IMCGC543 r (IO
RVLD JC7J!1
CP
GEEP
WC
Subarea 11.2
OS
J
Legend
C Planning Area 11 Boundary
J Subarea 11.1 Limits
Subarea 11.2 Limits
r j Subarea 11.3 Limits
Subarea 11 Zoning Districts
Residential
Very Low Density Residential
Public/Quasi-Public
Public Facility
Open Space
Golf and Recreation
Watercourse
Open Space
SOURCE. Indian Wells Murncpal Gode Sedlon 2'114110
Planning Area 11 and Subareas
Planning Area 11

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Desert
LID DA -6B,_.

MDA-3_ -
DA_2_' DA -2
DA -5
Ironwood
500 1,000
Feet
SOURCE Indian Wells Munmild Code Seclion 2014 110(b)
Planning Area 11 Subarea 11,3 -The Reserve
144
Legend
7 City Bounday The Reserve Zoning Districts
=The Reserve Boundary Residential
:7}Development Area Boundary Very Low Density Residential Public/Quasi-Public
=Public Facility
Open Space
Golf and Recreation
Watercourse
Open Space
Planning Area 11: Subarea 11.3 - The Reserve

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ZONE
PLANNING AREA 11 (VINTAGE/LIVING DESERT/HIDDEN VALLEY AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM

DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs
NOTES
RESIDENTIAL:
(NPR)
Natural Preserve

0.0 10.0
1/40
(RVLD)
Very Low Density
1,226.0
1,352.0

3.0 [1][2]
(RLD)
Low Density

0.0 0.0

4.5 (RMD)
Medium Density

0.0 0.0

7.0 (RMHD)
Medium High Density
Subtotal
COMMERCIAL:

0.0 0.0

12.0 1,226.0
1,352.0

1.1 [31[4]
(CC)
Community
Commercial
(RC) Resort Commercial
(OP) Professional Office
Subtotal
PUBLIC USE:
(PF) Public Facilities
(PP) Public Parks/
Recreation
Subtotal
OPEN SPACE:
(GR) Golf and Recreation
(COS) Country Club Open
Space
(WC) Watercourse
(POS) Public Owned Open
Space

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

9.6 0.0

9.6 491.0
n.a. n.a.
n.a. n.a.
n.a. n.a.
n.a. n.a.
234.5
100.0
941.5
n.a. n.a.
n.a. n.a.
n.a. n.a.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
PLANNING AREA 11 (VINTAGE/LIVING DESERT/HIDDEN VALLEY AREA) - CHART

MAXIMUM
GROSS ACREAGE MAXIMUM DUs DENSITY AVERAGE DENSITY
NOTES
Subtotal

PLANNING AREA
TOTAL
OVERLAY ZONES:
(AHO) Affordable Housing
(SHO) Senior Housing
(SSAO) Special Study Area
1,276.0 n.a.
n.a. n.a.
2,511.6 1,352.0 1.9

0.0 0.0

0.0 n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

The number of units currently approved within this designation is 1,352 units. The Vintage Country Club is currently approved for 1,102 units and the Reserve at Hidden Valley is approved for 250 units.

Approximately 491 acres (273 acres in the Vintage Country Club and 218 acres in the Reserve at Hidden Valley) of this Planning Area 11 are designated for golf course usage by the Golf and Recreation Zone. Thus, the acreage subject to actual development in accordance with the Planning Area 11 designation is the Planning Area 11 acreage minus the golf and recreation zone acreage.

Subarea 11.1 currently is approved for 1,102 units on approximately 883M acres, which yields an average density of 1.3 du/ac.

Subarea 11.3 within the City of Indian Wells is currently approved for 250 fee simple residential dwelling units on approximately 393 acres, which yields an average density of 0.636 du/ac.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Planning
Area 12
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 414 § 1, 1997; Ord. 418 § 1, 1997; Ord. 473 § 1, 2000; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007; Ord. 686 § 2, 2015)
§ 21.14.120. Planning Area 12 (Highway 111 Beautification and Improvement Planning Area).

The Highway 111 Beautification and Improvement Planning Area extends approximately four (4) miles along Highway 111 from Palm Desert on the west to Point Happy in the City of La Quinta to the east (see Map below). For detailed information on the Highway 111 Overlay Zone Development Standards, refer to Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Code.

PLANNING AREA 12 HIGHWAY 111 IMPROVEMENT AREA - MAP
I
L
Highway 111 Mgyiway 11Y
'J1///.//l////Ji//i/1//l/1/////1/��i/�I/O//l/10//1///////..�i/ii�iiiiiuril//////✓/I�/H/)0{ii/1/////O /iiliiiii,, 1 •
Planning
Area 12
Legend
City Boundary
%/ Nanning Area 12 @uundary
Planning Area 12
Planning Area 12
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996; Ord. 606 § 1, 2007; Ord. 720 § 4, 2019)

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Chapter 21.40 is hereby amended to read as follows:

CHAPTER 21.40

GOLF AND RECREATION ZONE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
§ 21.40.010. General.
(a) This Chapter contains the regulations for the Golf and Recreation Zone established by the City. The regulations of this Chapter shall apply to all properties within the Golf and Recreation Zones within the City, except as modified by standards and regulations pertaining to the planning area in which the development is located, in accordance with Section 21.12.010(b) of this Title.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, development within the Golf and Recreation Zone shall comply with the development standards of Chapter 21.23, including, but not limited to, lot dimensions, setbacks, and building height. In the event of any conflict between Chapter 21.23 and this Chapter, the provisions of this Chapter shall govern. Nothing in this subsection shall be interpreted to authorize residential uses prohibited by Section 21.40.030.
(c) Except as provided in this Chapter, development standards, performance standards, and all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code shall continue to apply. (Ord. 387 § 1, 1996)
§ 21.40.020. Purpose.

The purpose of the Golf and Recreation Zone is to ensure the long-term continuity of the various golf courses within the City as operating golf courses, to allow both public and private golf course operations inclusive of accessory structures and ancillary facilities associated with the operation and maintenance of a golf course, and to allow compatible, supportive recreational uses customarily associated with golf and recreation facilities while maintaining compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods and planned development patterns. (Ord. 387 § 1, 1996)
§ 21.40.030. Permitted uses.

Only uses and facilities directly related to, customarily incidental to, and operated in conjunction with the subject golf course or golf clubhouse facility shall be permitted within the Golf and Recreation Zone, subject to Section 21.40.040 of this Chapter, and are limited to the following:
(a) Primary Use
(1) Public or Private Golf Courses as defined by Section 21.08.260 (b) Accessory golf course uses

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(1) Ancillary golf facilities as defined by Section 21.08.062 (2) Maintenance or operations facilities
(3) Country club clubhouse facilities
(4) Golf practice area as defined by Section 21.08.261
(c) Supportive country club and golf recreational uses
(1) Supportive country club and golf recreational uses as defined by Section

21.08.171
(2) Bocce ball and similar low -intensity outdoor recreation amenities (3) Fitness, wellness, and similar recreation -support facilities customarily associated with golf and recreation operations
(4) Passive recreation amenities such as walking paths, seating/view areas, and landscape and open -space features, or similar uses.
(d) Prohibited Uses
(1) Gamified commercial entertainment enterprises including but not limited to Topgolf-type facilities, miniature golf, and other golf-themed commercial entertainment venues are prohibited.
(2) Residential uses.
(Ord. 387 § 1, 1996)
§ 21.40.040. Review and approval procedure.

All new development, redevelopment, remodeling, exterior modification, or change in use within the Golf and Recreation Zone shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with this Section and any other applicable provisions of this Title. Existing golf courses and related facilities shall be deemed to have complied with this Section if they were approved in conjunction with a development with an approved Master Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and/or Variance, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 21.06.030, 21.06.040, or 21.06.050. Any subsequent development, remodeling, or modification shall comply with Chapter 21.60 and any applicable conditions of approval, and shall be subject to the review and approval requirements set forth in subsections (a) through (d) below. (a) Ministerial Review. In -kind repair, ordinary maintenance, and restoration of existing, lawfully established improvements that do not expand building footprints, intensify a use, or materially alter site design may be processed ministerially, subject to any required permits issued by the Planning or Building Departments. (b) Architecture and Landscape Review.
(1) Before commencing construction, exterior modification, or other activities subject to Chapter 21.60 (Architecture and Landscape Review), the owner/applicant shall obtain Design Review approval by the appropriate Review Authority in accordance with Chapter 21.60.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(2) Design Review approval shall be required prior to issuance of building permits for any structures or site improvements that are subject to Chapter

21.60. (c) Conditional Use Permit ("CUP"). A CUP in accordance with Section 21.06.040 shall be required for any of the following:
(1) Establishment of a new golf course, or modification to the layout of an existing golf course or its customary golf features as described in Section

21.08.260; or
(2) Conversion of all or a portion of a golf course play area or golf practice area, as defined by Sections 21.08.260 & 21.08.261, to any accessory golf course use permitted by Section 21.40.030(b) or any supportive country club and golf recreational use permitted by Section 21.40.030(c); or
(3) Construction, expansion, relocation, or replacement of any ancillary golf facility, maintenance or operations facility, clubhouse facility, golf practice area, or supportive recreational use, other than work eligible for Ministerial Review in accordance with subsection 21.40.040(a); or
(4) Any expansion or operational change determined by the Director of Community Development to be a major revision or modification that warrants discretionary review for compatibility, operational impacts, or public welfare considerations.

Minor revisions or modifications to an approved CUP may be approved administratively where eligible in accordance with subsection 21.06.040(g). (d) Where both Design Review and a CUP are required, the CUP shall be obtained first or concurrently, and final building permit plans shall be consistent with both the approved CUP and the approved Design Review application. (Ord. 387 § 1, 1996)

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Sections 21.48.020, 21.48.030, 21.48.040, 21.48.050, and 21.48.080 are hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 21.48.020. Purpose.

The purpose of this overlay is to regulate the construction, placement, and modification of wireless communication facilities; to allow the providers of wireless communications services to provide such services to the community effectively and efficiently while minimizing the total number and overall impact of additional towers; to encourage collocation, the use of attached facilities, and the use of appropriate public and semi- public properties where possible; to require designs and parameters compatible with adjacent land uses; to promote long-range planning and cooperation between property owners, the wireless communications services providers and the City; and to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community.

The City shall utilize the Telecommunications Overlay Zone to encourage new commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities to locate in the Resort Commercial (RC), Sports Complex (SPX), and Golf and Recreation (GR) zones. These zones offer the telecommunications industry opportunities for new commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities to be developed that meet the needs of the industry while, at the same time, maintaining the aesthetic standards of the City. § 21.48.030. Location of the Telecommunications Overlay Zone.

The Telecommunications Overlay shall apply to the Sports Complex Zone (Chapter

21.35), the Resort Commercial Zone (Chapter 21.34), and within gated communities with a clubhouse facility in the Golf and Recreation Zone (Chapter 21.40). § 21.48.040. Applicability.

The standards and regulations of the Telecommunications Overlay shall apply to new commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities that are proposed within the Sports Complex and the Resort Commercial Zones. The standards and regulations of this Telecommunications Overlay shall also apply to new commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities proposed within the Golf and Recreation Zone, as provided in Section 21.48.080, within gated communities with a clubhouse facility. § 21.48.050. Review and approval procedures.

New commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities in the Sports Complex and Resort Commercial Zones, subject to the Telecommunications Overlay, are provided with a two -track review and approval process depending upon the nature of the proposal: administrative review and the full public review. Commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities proposed pursuant to Section 21.48.080 shall be subject to requirements of subsection (c) below.
(a) Administrative Review. Commercial antenna and wireless communication facilities that comply with the development standards specified in Sections

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

21.48.060 or 21.48.070, are subject to the Administrative Review Process noted in Section 21.90.060(d)(3).
(b) Full Public Review. Commercial antenna and wireless communication facilities that do not comply with the standards set forth in Sections 21.48.060 or 21.48.070 or are proposed to exceed the height standards shall be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit, per Section 21.06.040.
(c) Telecommunication Overlay Zone applied to the Golf and Recreation Zone within gated communities with a clubhouse facility. Commercial antenna and wireless communication facilities proposed pursuant to Section 21.48.080 shall be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit and shall be subject to the Full Public Review Process in accordance with Section 21.06.040 and Section 21.90.060(d)(2). (d) Submittal Requirements. Shall be the same as specified in Section 21.90.060 of the Antenna Ordinance.
§ 21.48.080. Development standards —Telecommunications Overlay Zone applied to Golf and Recreation Zone within gated communities with a clubhouse facility.

The goals of allowing the placement of wireless facilities within a gated community are to improve wireless communication coverage and capacity to the residents of Indian Wells. The intention is to: 1) require commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities to be sited in a manner that minimizes the visual impact of these facilities, 2) promote wireless communications facilities that are compatible with surrounding land uses, 3) protect the beauty of the natural environment by minimizing the potential visual blight of wireless communication facilities to the greatest extent possible, and 4) safeguard the health, safety, general welfare, and property values of the community.

Commercial antenna and wireless communication facilities are encouraged to locate within a clubhouse facility that can be designed to blend in with the buildings to meet both the technical requirements of the telecommunications industry and the aesthetic values of the community.
(a) Location. It is the intent of the Golf and Recreation Zone within gated communities with a clubhouse facility to allow a Telecommunications Overlay Zone that would permit new telecommunication facilities to integrate with the clubhouse structures to take advantage of the height these structures provide and to minimize aesthetic impacts. As such, the following review processes shall apply in the Golf and Recreation Zone within gated communities with a clubhouse facility:
(1) Commercial antenna and wireless communications facilities shall be subject to the Conditional Use Permit Review process, as described in Sections

21.06.040 and 21.90.060(2):
(b) Height. Commercial antenna and wireless communications facilities shall not exceed the maximum height of the golf clubhouse where the facility is located in the Golf and Recreation Zone.
(c) Exception to Height Standards. Commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities may exceed the maximum height standards set forth in Section

21.48.080(a) under the following conditions:

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
(1) The Applicant shall provide plans that fully screen the proposed facility from the view of surrounding properties and the public view unless it is co -located with existing facilities or structures. The communication facilities shall not create substantial visual, noise or thermal impacts and must be consistent with the character of the surrounding development, and;
(2) The Applicant provides substantial evidence that there are no existing structures or freestanding wireless communication facilities within the geographic area of sufficient height to meet the Applicant's requirements and the deficiency in height cannot be remedied at a reasonable cost, and; The Applicant provides substantial evidence that the extra height is necessary to avoid electromagnetic interference with other structures including existing wireless communications facilities within the geographic area, and; (4) The Applicant provides written documentation, to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission/City Council, that the extra height is necessary to allow for future rearrangement of antennas and/or to accept additional antennas of other service providers, and;
(3)
The Applicant's proposal complies with the design standards set forth in Section

21.48.080(e) and that the extended height shall integrate into the existing club house architecture so as not to appear as an addition to the structure. (d) Setbacks. Commercial antennas and wireless communication facilities shall comply with the setbacks prescribed in the base -zoning district except as described in Section 21.90.060(2) of the Antenna Ordinance. (e) Design Standards. In addition to the requirements of Section 21.90.060(4) of the Antenna Ordinance, the following standards shall apply:
(1) Building mounted antennas and any ancillary equipment shall be in scale and architecturally integrated with the building design in such a manner as to be visually unobtrusive. Screening may include designs such as locating the facility within attics, steeples, towers, behind and below parapets, or concealed within a new architectural addition to a building or structure which is architecturally compatible with the building. (2) When viewed directly against a building wall, colors and materials of the antennas shall match the existing building. Antennas attached to the building shall be painted or otherwise treated to match the exterior of the building or the antenna's background color.

Roof -mounted equipment and antennas shall be located as far away as feasible and aesthetically desirable from the edge of the building. All commercial antenna and wireless communication facilities that are visible at five (5) feet above ground level, three hundred (300) feet from the base of the building shall incorporate appropriate techniques to camouflage or disguise the facility, and/or blend it into the surrounding environment unless evidence, acceptable to the Planning Commission shows that such camouflaging is infeasible. All such roof -mounted equipment must be architecturally compatible with the building. (3)

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Cross
(4) Building mounted antenna and any ancillary equipment shall not interfere with views from neighboring properties.

Antenna and Wireless Communication Facilities
All commercial antenna and wireless communication facilities must be designed and located to minimize their visibility to the greatest extent feasible, considering technological requirements, by means of placement, screening, and camouflage.

Based on potential aesthetic impact, the order of preference for facility type is: facade mounted, roof mounted, ground mounted, and freestanding tower. Below are examples of acceptable and unacceptable building and roof treatments.

Photos courtesy of Stealth Network Technologies, Inc.

Bell towerFlag pole Roof mounted flag pole
Examples of acceptable disguised towers
rim
Facade mounted antennas Chimneys
Examples of acceptable building treatments
Louvers on facade
Custom steeple
Examples of acceptable building treatments

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. PC 2026-01

Roof mounted antenna
Examples of acceptable roof treatments
The City's Antenna Ordinance contains specific standards regarding the location and design of commercial antenna and wireless communication facilities within the City of Indian Wells. Specific questions regarding these standards should be directed to a Planning Department representative.

Roof mounted antenna
Parapet addition
Roof mounted antenna
Photos courtesy of Stealth Network Technologies, Inc.

Examples of unacceptable roof treatments
(Ord. 525 § 1, 2002)

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
April 16, 2026
To: City Council
From: City Manager Department
Prepared by: Christopher Freeland, City Manager
Kevin McCarthy, Finance Director
Subject: Review of Resident 14 -Day Tee Time Booking Policy at Indian Wells Golf Resort
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council DISCUSSES Resident 14 -Day Tee Time Booking System; and PROVIDES direction to Staff, if any; and
FINDS the project to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provision pursuant to Section 15060.

BACKGROUND:

At its recent meeting, following presentation and discussion of the January 15, 2026 Staff Report entitled "Comprehensive Overview and Discussion of Resident and Resident Guest Golf Rates at the Indian Wells Golf Resort" (Attachment No. 1), the City Council directed Staff and Troon to further evaluate the fairness of the current 14 -day resident tee time booking system and determine whether improvements could be made.

Council's direction was to maintain the current Resident golf rate and instead focus on whether existing booking practices provide equitable access for residents holding a valid Residence Benefit Card (Golf RBC). Specifically, Council requested an evaluation of whether the current reservation system creates any structural advantages for certain users and whether modifications to booking procedures may be warranted. This report responds directly to that request.

Current Booking System Overview:

Residents holding a valid Golf Residence Benefit Card (RBC) may reserve tee times up to fourteen (14) days in advance during the protected season.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Key components of the current system include:
• A uniform 14 -day advance booking window;
• A consistent daily tee time release schedule (6:00 AM); • Electronic timestamping of all reservations;
• Prepayment required at time of booking;
• Booking availability online, by phone, or in person; and • Continued protection of one-third of prime -season tee times for residents under longstanding allocation policy.

All Residence Benefit Card holders are subject to the same rules and access window. The 14 -day advance window applies equally to all residents. The allocation of one-third of protected peak -season tee times to residents remains unchanged and is governed by longstanding policy and easement agreements.

Fairness Standard:

For purposes of this review, the staff evaluated fairness using the following objective criteria:
• Equal advance booking window for all residents;
• Equal release time for all tee times;
• No preferential coding or prioritization within the reservation system; • No manual overrides that advantage specific users; and • Uniform enforcement of booking and cancellation policies.

Fairness in this context means equal access to opportunity, not equal distribution of tee times among all residents.

Review of System Integrity:

Staff and Troon conducted a focused review of operational practices, booking data, and system controls to evaluate concerns regarding potential manipulation.

1. Structural Equity
The reservation software releases tee times at a consistent and simultaneous time across all booking channels. No resident receives priority status within the system. Reservations are electronically timestamped and processed in chronological order. There is no programmed advantage embedded in the system.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

2. Practical Booking Behavior
Staff evaluated whether booking by phone or in person creates an advantage relative to online booking. While residents who are prepared to act immediately at the time of release may secure preferred tee times more consistently, this reflects responsiveness and demand timing rather than structural bias. The system does not prioritize one resident over another. If two residents attempt to reserve the same tee time, the reservation is awarded based on the first confirmed transaction in the system.

3. Review of Potential Manipulation
Staff and Troon reviewed potential gaming scenarios, including:
• Strategic over -booking followed by cancellation;
• Use of multiple resident cards to secure disproportionate access; • Staff intervention in reservation sequencing; and
• Circumvention of booking limits.

The review did not identify systemic abuse, procedural irregularities, or evidence of preferential treatment. While usage data indicates that a relatively small percentage of resident golfers account for a higher proportion of rounds played annually, this reflects frequency of participation rather than inequitable access. The system does not limit how often a resident may book within the published window, provided availability exists. High utilization by some residents does not equate to structural unfairness.

Assessment of Alternatives:

Council directed Staff to consider potential modifications, including:
• Shortening the advance booking window;
• Limiting the number of future reservations per resident; • Implementing a lottery system for prime tee times; or • Establishing a rotating priority structure.

Each alternative would introduce administrative complexity, reduce predictability, and potentially create new equity concerns. None were found to provide a clearly superior outcome relative to the current model.

The existing 14 -day booking system:
• Is simple and transparent;
• Applies uniformly to all residents; and,
• Protects resident access through the one-third tee time allocation.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Troon and Staff -Generated Ideas
Based on Council direction, operational review, and feedback received from residents, Staff and Troon evaluated potential refinements to the existing reservation system that would maintain the current structure while further standardizing access, reduce perceived favoritism in the reservation system, and accommodate resident comments about the early morning tee time release schedule. The following concepts are presented as operational adjustments that could be implemented within the existing system framework without altering the Resident rate structure or the protected tee time allocation. These refinements are intended to address process consistency and access dynamics identified during the review.

1. Online -Only Resident Booking
This modification would:
• Require all resident tee time reservations to be made through the online booking system
• Eliminate telephonic and in -person reservation channels for resident advance bookings
• Ensure all reservations are processed through the same electronic queue and timestamp system
Under this approach, all residents would equal access tee time reservations through a single online platform. Reservations would continue to be processed in chronological order based on electronic timestamping at the time the reservation is received.

Requiring online -only booking would standardize the reservation process across all users by placing all residents within the same digital queue. This approach would place all residents within the same reservation process regardless of booking method.

Implementation would require advanced communication with residents and transition support for individuals who currently utilize phone or in -person booking methods.

A fully online booking process would allow the booking window to move from 6:00 AM to any time during the day or night. The early release time was originally established to accommodate phone and in -person reservations before morning pro shop operations begin.

2. Limit Resident Tee Time Bookings to One Reservation per Day This modification would:

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
• Limit each resident to one active reservation per day on the protected resident tee sheet
• Prevent a single resident from holding multiple tee times on the same day • This restriction would limit the number of tee times held by an individual resident on a single day, maintaining availability within the protected tee sheet for additional reservation attempts
Once a resident secures a confirmed tee time reservation for a given day, that individual would not be eligible to reserve an additional tee time on that same day, regardless of the number of players included in the reservation. The restriction would apply to the reservation holder rather than the number of golfers in the group.

Residents would continue to be able to organize a foursome within a single reservation.

However, an individual resident would not be permitted to reserve multiple tee times on the same day.

Under the current system, when a resident reserves multiple tee times, those reservations temporarily remove additional tee times from availability for other residents seeking access to the protected tee sheet.

Troon and Staff recommend implementing these strategies to further improve the resident tee time equity.

City Council -Generated Ideas
In addition to the operational refinements identified by Staff and Troon, City Council Members raised a range of policy concepts during the January 15, 2026 meeting and through subsequent individual discussions. Staff met individually with Council Members to confirm that all concepts discussed were accurately reflected and included for consideration. These concepts reflect potential policy -level adjustments intended to further influence access, participation, and distribution of protected tee times. The following items are presented to ensure that all Council -directed considerations are included for discussion.

Council Idea (1): Additional Policy Consideration — Establishing Tee Time Booking Limits
During the January 2026 City Council meeting, Council discussed whether limits should be placed on how frequently residents may reserve tee times during the protected hours of 7:00 a.m. to 12:50 p.m. To inform this discussion, resident tee -time activity during those protected hours was analyzed for the period from October 1, 2023, to May 30, 2024.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
This timeframe was selected because both courses were fully operational, reflecting normal booking conditions and overall demand. Periods when one course was closed, such as during portions of the 2024-2025 season, were excluded to avoid skewing the analysis.

During the period of 7:00 a.m. to 12:50 p.m. between October 1, 2023, and May 30, 2024:
• 12,037 resident rounds were played during protected hours • These rounds were played by 1,133 unique resident golfers The table below presents this information by usage range, including the number and percentage of residents in each category, along with the corresponding number and percentage of rounds played. This table is also included as (Attachment 2).

Total rounds 10,1'2123 to 5/311'2424, 7104AM to 1250PM
Ssasonel Rnu nds:,r?rouped into renget
IW Residents by Group
55 brResldont Group
Cumulative Residents
% CurnullatMe Residents
Roo ods byGroup
% by Rounds Group
Cumulativellonnds
% Cumulative Rounds
864o96
RoonEU
4 ."'6 ta65
Pounds
3 66 to 75
Rounds
9 56 to 65
Rounds
7 46 to
RrnmI
26 3£. to 4S
Rounds
3&
26to3S
Roo rris
58 16 to 23
Rounds
104
64a 9S
Rounds
251
Sto- Silo Limb
635
Total Plows

1.133

0.4%

4.3%

0.8%

0.6%

2.3%'

3.214

5.1%

9.2%
221%

56.096 100.0%
e5m%
75 to R51
66 to 75
56 m 55
4511455
35to 45
25to36
16 to 26
67q 15
Ito- SRaltrtdn
Rounds
4 Rounds,
T
Raundf

1.6 P>aunds
23 Rome.
4&
Rounds
6S
Moods
143
Rounds
247
r om%
496
1,soo
OA%

0.7%
L5%
21%

4.4%I

7.6%

12.7%
2L9%
44,.0%
144.0%
X3
245
628
423
1,299
1,450
1,745
2A26
2,363
1395
12,037

3.0%
20%

5.2%

3.5%

14.8%
124%

14.5%

17.7%

19.7%
ILG%
10060%
061,496
765n65
66to75
S6 to 65
4640 SS
36 to 4S
2S on 35
16to..2S
61St 9.6
Rounds
Rounds,
Munch
Rounds
Round
Rounds
Pnu,rtds
Rounds
Rounds
1 to- Sib uleds
363
606'.
1216

1.659
Z8

4..411&

6.153

4.273
14642
1'Zo37.
311%
50%

10.2%

13.7%

24.5%
385%

51.0%

63.7%

88.4%
1D0.0%j
Based on the data above, usage patterns indicate:
• 7 residents (approximately 0.7%) accounted for 608 rounds (approximately 5.0%) played during the protected period
• 16 residents (approximately 1.5%) accounted for 1,236 rounds (approximately

10.2%) played during the protected period
• 49 residents (approximately 4.4%) accounted for 2,958 rounds (approximately

24.5%) played during the protected period
• 143 residents (approximately 12.7%) accounted for 6,153 rounds (approximately

51.0%) played during the protected period

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
• 247 residents (approximately 21.9%) accounted for 8,279 rounds (approximately

68.7%) played during the protected period
• 498 residents (approximately 44.0%) accounted for 10,642 rounds (approximately

88.4%) played during the protected period
This information is provided to assist Council in evaluating participation levels and the distribution of protected tee time access. The data reflects the frequency of play only and does not indicate misuse of the reservation system.

Council may consider establishing limits on the number of protected tee times a resident may reserve within a defined time period. Such limits could be intended to broaden access to protected tee times by increasing the number of unique Residence Benefit Card holders able to secure reservations during high -demand periods.

Council Idea (2): Eliminate resident guest play during protected hours (7:00 a.m. — 12:50 p.m.)
This modification would:
• This concept would restrict protected tee times exclusively to residents during designated hours. The objective would be to ensure that resident tee time allocations are fully utilized by Residence Benefit Card holders during peak demand periods.

Council Idea (3): Limit resident bookings for protected tee times to once per month
Limit Resident Bookings for Protected Tee Times to Once per Month This modification would:
• This concept would limit each resident to one protected tee time reservation within a defined monthly period. The objective would be to increase the number of unique residents able to access protected tee times during high -demand periods.

Modified Monthly Booking Structure (Alternative Concept; This modification would:
• One variation discussed would limit residents to one protected reservation per month during the primary advance booking window (for example, 14 days to 8 days in advance). Remaining protected tee times would then be made available to

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
all residents within a shorter booking window (for example, 7 days or 72 hours in advance).

Council Idea (4): Consider a Potential Change to the Booking Window Policy and Pricing Model
Council may also consider modifying the booking window structure by introducing a tiered advance reservation model paired with variable pricing.

This modification would:

Under this approach, residents would have the option to secure tee times at different advance intervals, with pricing corresponding to the timing of the reservation. An illustrative example is as follows:
• 30 -day advance booking at $100
• 14 -day advance booking at $60
• Walk-up booking at $40
This structure would maintain the existing 14 -day booking window while introducing an earlier access option at different price points. A tiered booking model would allow residents to choose between earlier reservation certainty at a higher price or greater flexibility at a lower price closer to the day of play. The approach is commonly used in golf operations to manage demand during peak periods and to more evenly distribute tee time utilization throughout the booking window.

Council Idea (5): Create a Secondary RBC Golf Card
Council may consider establishing an optional, limited -availability Residence Benefit Card (RBC) Golf program that provides enhanced booking access through a structured, fee - based model.

Under this concept, participating residents would purchase a secondary RBC Golf Card that includes a defined booking benefit, such as a unique Coupon for a guaranteed tee time reservation for up to 4 players at the current resident rate. The reservation would be available at an extended advance booking window (for example, up to 30 days in advance), outside of the standard 14 -day reservation system. Reservations under this program would be coordinated directly through the Golf Shop, allowing residents to secure tee times in advance with assistance from the golf staff. The program could include controlled issuance (limited quantity) to manage demand and preserve overall system balance.

An illustrative structure could include:

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
• One guaranteed tee time reservation (up to four players) • Extended booking window (e.g., up to 30 days in advance) • Direct scheduling through Golf Shop staff
• Fixed RBC Golf Card program fee (e.g., $250-$300 annually) • Non -transferable benefit with no standalone monetary value This type of program is designed to provide an additional access option for residents seeking greater reservation certainty while maintaining the integrity of the standard booking system. Similar approaches are utilized at other municipal golf facilities as part of broader demand management and revenue strategies.

For context, comparable municipal golf operations in the Coachella Valley utilize tiered access and pricing structures to manage demand and provide enhanced booking opportunities for residents, as summarized below. In addition to access structures, regional municipal golf programs use discounted resident rates and dynamic pricing models to manage demand and optimize tee -time utilization. The general pricing structures are summarized below.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Category
Desert Willow Golf Resort (Palm Desert)
SilverRock Resort (La Quinta)
1) Resident Discount
Structure
Reduced resident rates compared to non-
resident/public rates
Reduced resident rates relative to public
pricing; discounts vary by season
2) Tee Times Booking
Window

3.5 Days, booking available at 7:00pm. Golf
Shop is closed.
3 days at 5:00am.
3) Typical Resident Rate
$52 Rate, $40 in summer, no discount for
guests unless you bought the platinum card.
$60 Season and $35 Summer . Guests pay
30% off the rack rate
4) Tee Times Held for
Residents
None
Two foursomes per hour
5) Advance Booking Pricing
Impact
Earlier booking windows and premium
access programs may carry higher effective
rates or fees. Resident may purchase a
platinum card($349) to allow for 60 day
booking window. Limited number of cards
sold(400). With This card the Resident and
Guests pay 25-30% off the rack rate.

Pricing varies by demand; earlier access
may be tied to program participation rather
than fixed pricing tiers. Residents who book
more than 3 days out pay rack rate, no
discount
6) Walk -Up / Same -Day
Pricing
Typically lower pricing during low -demand
periods to maximize utilization. They pay the
Resident rate
Discounted same -day or short-term booking
rates during lower demand periods. They
pay the resident rate
7) Premium Access
Program Fees
Optional programs (e.g., player cards) may
include annual fees (commonly
—$300-$500 $500 range) tied to enhanced
access and pricing benefits. Platinum card.

Price is $349 yearly, and allows the 60 day
booking window with rates at 25-30 off rack
rate. If not a member of the Platinum Card,
then no discount if booked more than 3.5
days in advance.

The standard Resident Card (which provides
discounted rates and priority access) costs:
$150 total and is valid for 3 years. There is
no formal " premium access" or higher -tier
paid program (like a separate VIP or
enhanced booking membership) currently
published for SilverRock. No premium
access offered, Resident pays rack rate if
booked more than 3 days in advance
The concepts presented above are intended to provide a range of operational and policy options for Council consideration and do not reflect identified deficiencies in the current reservation system, which is operating as designed.

OPTIONS:

The City Council has multiple options available:

1. Maintain the Current 14 -Day Booking System (Status Quo)

2. Transition to 14 -Day Online -Only Resident Booking

3. Implement Reservation Limits for Protected Rounds

4. Modify Other Booking Parameters (e.g., advance window, allocation structure)

5. Provide Alternative Direction

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOAL:

The review of equity access to the resident golf benefit is an approved 2026 City Council Strategic Planning Goal.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with maintaining the current booking system. Any modification to booking channels would not materially affect golf revenues but may require minor operational adjustments.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed per the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental regulations. The City, acting as the Lead Agency, determined that the ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment as there is no possibility that the action would result in a significant environmental impact, and because it does not constitute a "project" as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Comprehensive Overview and Discussion of Resident and Resident Guest Golf Rates at the Indian Wells Golf Resort Staff Report

2. Rounds Data by Category

3. Rounds Data by Unique Player

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION
Requested by City Council following the January 15, 2026, discussion.

Evaluate:
• Fairness of current 14 -day booking system
• Whether structural advantages exist
• Potential modifications to booking practices
7 N
O
0 Z
LPL
>m
4-
O
L
D
4)
C
O
i
D
V
l-
4 -
v)
s
. 3
N
a)
O
a)
o_
O
E
N
m
O
O
O
a
E
O
t(f)
)
V
c
O
2 V
N
0 � -o
= O
3 .E O
0) 4) O O
o O > - c
s

OO N N O
O O O
_a i -
O O O 4)
73 E E E N

T) O O O V) V) V) C
N
tog
O
Q • • • • •

STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1

ONLINE -ONLY BOOKING
All reservations made online
Single digital queue for all users
Eliminates multiple booking channels
Effect:
• Standardizes the reservation process
• **Online only creates an opportunity to
change the daily booking time from 6:00 am
to what the Council prefers**
CI, Hail
Closed fluor
IdpmtoIpm'I

STAFF RECOMMENDATION 2

ONE RESERVATION PER DAY
Limit residents to one booking per day during the protected period of October through May, between 7:00 am and 12:50 pm
Effect:
• Eliminates multiple same -day bookings
• Maintains availability for additional reservations

USAGE CONTEXT
• Top —13% of residents account for —51% of rounds
• Top -44% account for —88% of rounds
• 1,133 total resident users
t."0"
r
`

Z
O
N
N
D
N
D
v
a)
u)
*N
a)
N
0)
c
0 0
0 N
E
a)
N
may consider:
•V
C
D
0 U
Whether to m aintain curr ent acc ess model
.
.
44-
O
0 4—
V)
C
0 0
0 D
0 U
a)
73 .5
0 2
0 Cl)
L
a)
E
a)
Individual C ouncil
.

COUNCIL OPTION 1 - BOOKING LIMITS
Places limits the number of bookings Residents can make during the protected period of October through May, between 7:00 am and 12:50 pm Effect:
• Expands access to more residents

COUNCIL OPTION 2 - RESIDENT -ONLY

PROTECTED HOURS
Restrict 7:00 am — 12:50 pm to residents only
Effect:
• Maximizes resident use of protected tee times

COUNCIL OPTION 3 - MONTHLY LIMIT STRUCTURE
Places limits the number of bookings Residents can make during the protected period of October through May, between 7:00 am and 12:50 pm, for 14 days or 7 days
Removes limits between 7 days and 72 hours)
Effect:
• Balances early access and broader participation

COUNCIL OPTION 4 - TIERED BOOKING & PRICING
MODEL
30 -day booking: $100
14 -day booking: $60
Daily walk-up: $40
Effect:
• Aligns pricing with demand
• Distributes tee time utilization

COUNCIL OPTION SECONDARY RBC

GOLF CARD
Optional enhanced access program:

Extended booking window (e.g., 30 days)
One guaranteed tee time (up to 4 players)
Direct booking through the Golf Shop
Annual fee (e.g., $250-$300)
Effect:
• Provides additional access option
• Maintains existing system structure

COUNCIL OPTIONS
Maintain the current system
Adopt Staff Recommendation - Implement operational refinements Adopt policy modifications
Combine approaches
Provide alternative direction

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ATTACHMENT #1

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
January 15, 2026
To: City Council
From: City Manager Department
Prepared by: Dr. Chris Freeland, City Manager
Eric Ceja, Assistant City Manager
Kevin McCarthy, Finance Director
Subject: Comprehensive Overview and Discussion of Resident and Resident Guest Golf Rates at Indian Wells Golf Resort
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council DISCUSSES Resident and Resident Guest Golf Rates; and PROVIDES direction to Staff, if any; and
FINDS the project to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provision pursuant to Section 15060.

BACKGROUND:

On April 17, 2025, at the Strategic Planning Session, the City Council requested a review of the City's Resident and Resident Guest golf rates. The purpose of this staff report is to provide the City Council with a comprehensive and organized summary of the policies, historical context, current rate structures, and operational framework associated with Resident and Resident Guest golf rates at the Indian Wells Golf Resort (IWGR). This report is intended to serve as a foundational reference document to support future Council policy discussions and does not propose specific rate changes or policy actions.

This report compiles and presents data and policy context related to:
• Tee sheet allocation and booking structures;
• Resident and resident guest fee methodologies and current rate schedules; • Historical Council discussions and policy evolution;
• Resident Benefit Card participation;
• Resident Amenity Fee considerations;
• Operational context with current golf management and rate pricing constraints; • Preliminary benchmarking and revenue context.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Current resident and resident guest rates are available to card -holding residents through the City's Resident Benefit Card (Golf RBC), as summarized below.

Resident Benefit Card and Participation
All resident access to reduced golf rates at IWGR is tied to possession of a valid Resident Benefit Card (Golf RBC) issued by the City. The Golf RBC entitles qualified residents to discounted green fees and resident guest privileges.

During FY 2024-25, the City issued approximately 2,642 active Golf Resident Benefit Cards. Golf Resident Benefit Card revenue totaled roughly $132,100 in FY 2024-25 and is deposited into the Golf Fund to partially offset operational and maintenance costs at the Indian Wells Golf Resort.
• Golf RBC holders: Card issuance is governed by City policy and resolution.

Residents may purchase up to two (2) resident benefit cards per eligible property annually. Dependent children under 21 may also obtain a card. • Resident Benefit Card pricing: The Golf RBC is currently $45 per card (plus $5 for a printed card).

Historical Context of Golf Access & Resident Rates
The City's involvement in the Indian Wells Golf Resort traces back to an economic development partnership with hotel and resort stakeholders, designed to establish and sustain championship golf as a tourism asset.
1985 Easement Agreement
In 1985, the City entered into an easement agreement with the original owners of the Grand Hyatt and Renaissance Esmeralda Resorts, providing the City with use of hotel - adjacent land to develop and operate 36 holes of championship golf. The agreement created a framework for allocating tee times among hotel guests and the general public in exchange for land and development rights. (Due to its extensive length, exceeding 300 pages, the 1985 Easement Agreement, along with all amendments and supporting Staff Reports, is accessible on the City's official website.) 1993 Complimentary Golf Agreement
In January 1993, the City, in partnership with the hotel entities, executed the Complimentary Golf Agreement, establishing discounted golf benefits for select groups, including visiting dignitaries, hotel owners, PGA cardholders, and staff.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
1993 Resident Rate Establishment
In May 1993, the first formal resident rate was established through an amendment to the 1985 Easement Agreement. The Resident addition read in part: A person who presents a valid Property Owner Identification Card issued by the City of Indian Wells shall be entitled to play golf at the Golf Resort at the rate of 70% of the posted green fees, but at a rate not to exceed thirty-five dollars ($35.00).

The criteria for issuance of such Property Owner Identification Cards shall be within the sole discretion of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, and may be changed by such City Council from time to time in exercise of that discretion.

Approval of the hotel partners and the City was required. Subsequent amendments refined eligibility and rate levels.
2020 Updates to Complimentary Golf Agreement
The most recent comprehensive update to this agreement occurred in 2020, which documented:
• Resident rate revisions to $50.00 (season) and $35.00 (off-season); • Elimination of prior complimentary golf benefits for City employees; and • Updated classifications for resident benefit participation. (Attachment: 2020 Complimentary Golf Agreement & Resolution 2020-42) Tee Sheet Allocation and Rate Structure
Tee Sheet Allocation Framework
Under the governing easement agreement and operational policy, tee time slots are allocated daily during peak season (October 1 through May 31) to protect a portion of the course for residents and hotel guests:
• 1/3 reserved for hotel guests
• 1/3 available to the general public
• 1/3 reserved for Indian Wells residents
This allocation applies from 7:00 a.m. to 12:50 p.m. daily during the protected period known as seasonally protected rounds. Tee sheets remain unrestricted outside this window and during the summer/shoulder months (June 1 through September 30). (Based on established historical policy.)
IWGR accommodates 288 protected rounds per day, or 69,696 total rounds during peak season. During the protected period, the one-third allocation equates to 96 resident

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2O26
rounds, 96 hotel guest rounds, and 96 public rounds per day, subject to operational conditions, tournaments, and weather.

During FY 2023-24, of the approximately 43,989 seasonally protected rounds (from 7:00 a.m. to 12:50 p.m.), Residents and Resident Guests accounted for 15,881 rounds, representing approximately 36 percent of total seasonally protected rounds. Resident play comprised 12,632 rounds (approximately 29 percent of all seasonally protected rounds and 80% of seasonally protected rounds set aside specifically for residents), while Resident Guest play accounted for 3,249 rounds (approximately 7 percent of all seasonally protected rounds and 20% of seasonally protected rounds set aside specifically for residents). Resident Guest rounds are booked under Resident Rounds but charged at a Resident Guest rate.

Tee Time Access Window
Residents with a valid Golf RBC may book tee times up to 14 days in advance at resident rates; all tee times must be prepaid and booked online or via phone prior to play. Walk- up play at the $35 resident rate.

Resident Rate Schedule
The current resident rate structure, as published by the City, is:
• January 1 — April 30:
o Reserved tee time: $50 per round
o Same -day, pre -paid walk-up: $35 per round
• May 1 — December 31:
o All resident play: $35 per round
Residents must present a valid Golf RBC at check -in to receive the resident rate.

D. Resident Guest Rate Structure
Residents may book resident guests at reduced rates tied to seasonal pricing grids that vary throughout the year. Current resident guest green fees published by the City include:

Period Mon —Thu Fri —Sun
July 1 - Aug 21 $55 $65
Aug 30 - Sep 30 $65 $75
Oct 1 — Apr 30 $110 $110
May 1 — May 17 $89 $99
May 18 — May 31 $79 $89
Jun 1 — Jun 20 $55 $65

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Resident guests must play with a resident who holds a valid Golf RBC to receive resident guest rates; those rates must be prepaid at the time of booking.

Rate Methodology and Formula
Historically and for budgeting purposes, the City has evaluated resident guest rates using a cost -recovery methodology tied to the overall golf operating budget. In prior analyses presented to the City Council, this methodology was expressed using the following formula:

Total Golf Program Budget + Total Budgeted Rounds + $20 This calculation was used as a benchmark to estimate the full cost of a round of golf, inclusive of operating expenses, and to evaluate whether resident guest play was recovering its proportionate share of golf operating costs.

As reflected in the supporting tables above, this methodology is also evaluated on an annualized basis by comparing total resident guest green fee revenue collected during the fiscal year to the total number of resident guest rounds played. This comparison produces an effective average resident guest rate, which is then assessed against the calculated annual cost per round to determine the extent to which resident guest play is recovering the cost of golf operations.

While resident guest rates vary seasonally based on demand, the annualized cost - recovery analysis has historically been used by the City as a financial benchmark for budget development and policy evaluation. This information is provided for contextual and analytical purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to modify existing resident or resident guest rate structures.

Resident Amenity Fee (RAF) Context
For many years, the Indian Wells Golf Resort operated at an annual operating deficit, averaging approximately $1.0 to $2.5 million between FY 2010 and FY 2022. One contributing factor identified by the City was the opportunity cost associated with providing reduced -rate resident and resident guest golf during peak revenue periods. In response, the City Council adopted a Resident Amenity Fee (RAF) as a policy tool to partially offset these foregone revenues and support ongoing golf operations.

Historically, the Resident Amenity Fee (RAF) was utilized as a policy tool to offset golf operating costs and support resident access to reduced rates. As part of the amended golf management agreement with Troon in 2023, approved by the City Council, the RAF was formally eliminated. Under the revised agreement, Troon Golf is now required to operate the Indian Wells Golf Resort on a financially sustainable and profitable basis without reliance on a Resident Amenity Fee subsidy. This policy shift reflects Council

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
direction to improve transparency, reduce indirect resident subsidization, and align golf operations with enterprise fund best practices.

Council History of Resident And Guest Golf Rate Discussions Over the last several years, the City Council has periodically reviewed resident and resident guest golf rate structures, tee time allocations, and the financial performance of the IWGR. Key items of policy review have included resident access equity, rate -setting methodology, and subsidization of golf operations. The Council's strategic planning session in April 2025 directed staff to compile comprehensive information on these topics to support Council deliberations.

Summary Timeline of Key City Council Actions and Discussions:

November 2019 - The City Council initiated a comprehensive review of resident golf rates and tee time allocation policies, introducing the concept of "golf equity" and directing staff to analyze resident usage patterns and access to prime tee times. This marked the beginning of a multi -year policy discussion regarding resident access and rate fairness.

January 2020 - During the City's Strategic Planning Session, the Council examined the financial sustainability of the Indian Wells Golf Resort and discussed options to reduce ongoing subsidies. Particular attention was given to residents' guest rates and whether they adequately recovered the cost of play, with staff directed to develop options for further Council consideration.

July 2020 - The City Council approved revisions to the Easement Agreement with hotel partners to formally incorporate updated resident rate provisions reflected in the Complimentary Golf Agreement. This action reinforced the contractual framework governing resident access and rate protections.

October —November 2020 - The Council reviewed and amended employee -related golf benefits under the Complimentary Golf Agreement, including reclassification of employee rates to address potential tax implications. These actions clarified eligibility categories and reduced non-resident complimentary benefits.

November 2022 - The City Council revisited resident tee time availability and golf rate policies in the context of ongoing discussions regarding the Golf Resident Amenity Fee (RAF). Council discussion focused on the financial impact of protecting prime -season tee times for residents and the opportunity cost associated with reduced -rate play during the most profitable periods. The Council directed further study and community engagement but took no formal action.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Management Contract and Operational Considerations
In 2023, the City entered a renewed management agreement with Troon Golf to operate IWGR, which includes dynamic pricing authority for non-resident play but binds the operator to resident and resident guest rate restrictions as set by City policy and the governing easement agreement.

Key elements of the agreement include:
• Use of dynamic pricing by Troon to maximize revenue from non-resident and hotel guest play;
• Contractual limitations preventing Troon from modifying resident and resident guest rates, which remain subject to City policy and Council action; • A financial structure designed to return the Golf Resort to profitability without reliance on the Resident Amenity Fee.

Troon's current projections for FY 2025-26 indicate that the golf operation can achieve profitability. This dynamic pricing strategy maximizes revenue on non-resident and hotel guest rounds while preserving resident benefits.

The implementation of a performance -based management agreement with Troon Golf marked a fundamental shift in the operational and financial management of the Indian Wells Golf Resort. This change replaced prior operating practices that had resulted in sustained annual operating losses and required General Fund support. Under the revised management structure, the Golf Resort transitioned to an enterprise -based operating model with clear performance accountability and an expectation of financial sustainability.

The table below presents the Golf Resort's net operating income for the period between 2010 and 2026. To ensure comparability across years, the data has been normalized to reflect core operating performance only. Specifically, the analysis excludes the Resident Amenity Fee (RAF), General Fund contributions, and City -funded capital expenditures, thereby isolating revenues and operating expenses directly attributable to Golf Resort operations. This approach provides a consistent basis for evaluating changes in operating performance over time and the financial impact of the revised management model.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

NET OPERATING INCOME
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
(1,000,000)
(1,500,000)
(2,000,000)
(2,500,000)
Based on the normalized financial data presented in the table, the Indian Wells Golf Resort incurred cumulative operating losses totaling s8,018,143 between 2010 and 2022.

Following the implementation of the performance -based management agreement in 2023, the Golf Resort returned to operational profitability, generating cumulative net operating income of s3,203,907 for the period from 2023 through 2026. This change reflects a material improvement in operating performance under the revised management structure.

Round Usage, Allocation, and Revenue
The data demonstrates that resident golf usage is not evenly distributed across all Golf RBC holders. During FY 2023-24, the Golf Resort received 18,456 total resident rounds (Prime and Non -Prime) from 1,407 unique resident golfers. A relatively small number of resident golfers, 160 residents (about 11%), account for roughly 50% of resident rounds played annually, particularly during peak season. This information was requested to inform prior Council discussions regarding resident equity, access to prime tee times, and the fiscal implications of the current resident rate structure. This information is presented for analytical purposes only and is not intended to characterize individual resident usage patterns or draw conclusions regarding appropriate access levels.

Council direction in 2025 also requested rounds and revenue data broken down by cohort, including:
• Total rounds per year by resident, resident guest, hotel guests, and public play; • Prime vs. non -prime allocation usage;
• Average daily rate (ADR) by cohort and seasonal period;

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
• Distribution of resident play by individual users.

Round Usacie
As shown in the chart below, of the more than 40,000 rounds of play at the Celebrity Course in calendar year 2025, 31% of rounds were booked by residents, 37% of rounds were booked by the public, 23% of course use was used for tournament play. The remaining tee times were booked by resident guests, and various Troon Programs, such as Troon Advantage and Troon Access.

ROUND ALLOCATION BY TYPE
Tournament
23%
Troon
5%
Resident Guest Non-
F$3@nt Guest
3°1Qrime
1%
Resident Non -Prime
12%
Resident Prime
19%
Public Non -Prime
24%
Public Prime
13%
Comparative Municipal Context
As part of future benchmarking efforts, staff has compiled resident and municipal rate structures from municipal -owned golf courses in the Coachella Valley (see table below).

Comparative factors under review include resident green fee structures, resident identification or card fees, availability of reserved tee times, advance booking windows, cart inclusion policies, and effective discounts relative to merchandise and food and beverage offerings. Although not a municipal golf course, The Classic Club is included in this table as it is operated by Troon.

Staff notes that direct comparisons across golf facilities are inherently limited due to substantive differences in operational, financial, and market conditions. These differences may include, but are not limited to, the number of holes operated, course design and

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
conditioning standards, capital reinvestment obligations, staffing and management models, reliance on tourism and resort -based demand, and the extent to which dynamic pricing is utilized. Additionally, municipal golf facilities vary in their financial structure, with some operating with ongoing General Fund support and others, such as the Indian Wells Golf Resort, operating under an enterprise model with an expectation of financial sustainability. As a result, benchmarking information is intended to provide general context regarding municipal golf practices rather than serve as a basis for direct rate equivalency.

Data Set
Indian Wells
Golf Resort
Desert Willow
(Palm Desert)
Silver Rock
(La Quinta)
Tahquitz Creek
(Palm Springs)
Classic Club
(Thousand Palms)
The Lights at Indio
(Indio)
Resident Rate
$50 Season
$35 Off Season
$52
$60 Season
$35 Summer
$61 weekday
$65 weekend
$130 and includes
a$25foodvoucher
$50 Season
$35 Off Seson
$10 Junior
Resident Guest
$110 Season
$55 Off Season
N/A
30% off posted
rate
N/A
N.A
N/A
Resident Card
$50 annual
$50 annual
$150 for 3 years.
$40 annual
$79 annual
N/A
Tee Times Held for
Resident Play
30% of Tee Sheet
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Tee Times Booking
Window
14days

3.5 Days
3 Days
7 Days

3.5 Days
N/A
Cart Fees
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$15 / Player
$10 Pull Cart
Golf Merch Discounts
20%
None
15%
Unknown
None
None
F&B Discounts
20%
None
15%
Unknown
None
None
Although not located in the Coachella Valley, Torrey Pines was mentioned as a municipal golf course which staff should include in this report. Information related to resident rates for Torrey Pines is contained below.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Data Set
Indian Wells
Golf Resort
Torrey Pines - South
(San Diego)
Torrey Pines - North (San
Diego)
Resident Rate
$50 Season
$35 Off Season
$73.00 (M-Th.)
$90.00 (F-Sn / Holidays)
Advance Booking Fee -$32.00/
Player
SD Golf Reservation Fee -
$60.00
Senior - $51.00
Junior - $73.00
Twilight - $44.00
$51.00 (M-Th.)
$68 (F -Sun / Holiday)
Advance Booking Fee -$32.00/
Player
SD Golf Reservation Fee -
$60.00
Senior - $37.00
Junior - $51.00
Twilight - $33.00
Resident Guest
$110 Season
$55 Off Season
N/A
N/A
Resident Card
$50 annual
$25 annual
$25 annual
Tee Times Held for
Resident Play
30% of Tee Sheet
N/A
N/A
Tee Times Booking
Window
14days
90 days
90 days
Cart Fees
N/A
$48.00
$48.00
Golf Merch Discounts
20%
None
None
F&B Discounts
20%
None
None
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOALS:

The Council's request for a comprehensive review of resident and resident guest golf rates during the April 2025 Strategic Planning Session reflects community concerns regarding access equity, financial sustainability of golf operations, and long-term stewardship of the IWGR as a key City asset.

OPTIONS:

Council has the following options:

1. Request additional information or refined analyses from staff and golf management; or,

2. Provide direction on modifications to resident or resident guest rates; or,

3. Direct revisions to the tee time allocation policy; or,

4. Adopt a new rate -setting methodology with scheduled Council review; or,

5. Do nothing and retain current policies; or

6. Provide an alternative direction.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of any rate or policy changes will depend on Council direction.

Considerations may include:
• Potential changes to resident and resident guest green fee revenue; • Impacts to tee time availability and utilization during peak periods; and • Effects on the Golf Fund, including Golf Resident Benefit Card revenue and overall golf operating performance.

No fiscal impact is associated with receipt and discussion of this report.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed per the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental regulations. The City, acting as the Lead Agency, determined that the ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment as there is no possibility that the action would result in a significant environmental impact, and because it does not constitute a "project" as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Complimentary Golf Agreement and Resolution No. 2020-42

2. Resident Usage Distribution Analysis FY 2023-24 (Anonymized)

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

INDIAN WELLS
I F1 '.

Total rounds 10/1/2023 to 5/31/2024, 7:00AM to 12:50PM
Seasonal Rounds grouped into ranges
IW Residents by Group
0/0 by Resident Group
Cumulative Residents
0/0 Cumulative Residents
Rounds by Group
% by Rounds Group
Cumulative Rounds
0/0 Cumulative Rounds
ATTACHMENT #2
86 to 95
Rounds
76 to 85
Rounds
66 to 75
Rounds
56 to 65
Rounds
46 to 55
Rounds
36 to 45
Rounds
26 to 35
Rounds
16 to 25
Rounds
6 to 15
Rounds
1 to 5 Rounds
Total Players
4 3
9 7
26 36
58 104
251
635
1,133

0.4%

0.3%

0.8%

0.6%

2.3%

3.2%

5.1%

9.2%

22.1%

56.0%
100.0%
86 to 95
Rounds
76 to 85
Rounds
66 to 75
Rounds
56 to 65
Rounds
46 to 55
Rounds
36 to 45
Rounds
26 to 35
Rounds
143

12.6%
16 to 25
Rounds
6 to 15
Rounds
1 to 5 Rounds
4 0.4%
7 0.6%
16 1.4%
23 2.0%
49 4.3%
85 7.5%
247

21.8%
498

43.9%
1,133

99.9%
363
245
628
423
1,299
1,450
1,745
2,126
2,363
1,395
12,037

3.0%

2.0%

5.2%

3.5%

10.8%

12.0%

14.5%

17.7%

19.7%

11.6%
100.0%
86 to 95
76 to 85
66 to 75
56 to 65
46 to 55
36 to 45
26 to 35
16 to 25
6 to 15
1 to 5 Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
Rounds
363
608
1,236
1,659
2,958
4,408
6,153
8,279
10,642
12,037

3.0%

5.1%

10.3%

13.8%

24.6%

36.6%

51.1%

68.8%

88.5%
100.1%
Protected Rounds by Category
1 of 1

ATTACHMENT #3
Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Restricted Golf Times October 2023 to May 2024
Total
Resident Rounds
Played
Average
Rounds
over 8
Months
Total
Resident Rounds
Played
Average
Rounds
over 8
Months
Total
Resident Rounds
Played
Average
Rounds
over 8
Months
Total
Resident Rounds
Played
Average
Rounds
over 8
Months
Total
Resident Rounds
Played
Average
Rounds
over 8
Months
Resident 1 95 12 Resident 31 51 6 Resident 61 43 5 Resident 91 35 4 Resident 121 29 4 Resident 2 93 12 Resident 32 51 6 Resident 62 42 5 Resident 92 34 4 Resident 122 29 4 Resident 3 89 11 Resident 33 51 6 Resident 63 42 5 Resident 93 34 4 Resident 123 28 4 Resident 4 86 11 Resident 34 51 6 Resident 64 42 5 Resident 94 34 4 Resident 124 28 4 Resident 5 84 11 Resident 35 51 6 Resident 65 41 5 Resident 95 34 4 Resident 125 28 4 Resident 6 81 10 Resident 36 51 6 Resident 66 41 5 Resident 96 33 4 Resident 126 28 4 Resident 7 80 10 Resident 37 50 6 Resident 67 41 5 Resident 97 33 4 Resident 127 28 4 Resident 8 74 9 Resident 38 50 6 Resident 68 41 5 Resident 98 33 4 Resident 128 28 4 Resident 9 73 9 Resident 39 50 6 Resident 69 40 5 Resident 99 33 4 Resident 129 28 4 Resident 10 71 9 Resident 40 49 6 Resident 70 40 5 Resident 100 32 4 Resident 130 28 4 Resident 11 71 9 Resident 41 48 6 Resident 71 39 5 Resident 101 32 4 Resident 131 27 3 Resident 12 70 9 Resident 42 48 6 Resident 72 39 5 Resident 102 32 4 Resident 132 27 3 Resident 13 68 9 Resident 43 48 6 Resident 73 39 5 Resident 103 32 4 Resident 133 27 3 Resident 14 68 9 Resident 44 48 6 Resident 74 38 5 Resident 104 32 4 Resident 134 27 3 Resident 15 67 8 Resident 45 48 6 Resident 75 37 5 Resident 105 32 4 Resident 135 27 3 Resident 16 66 8 Resident 46 47 6 Resident 76 37 5 Resident 106 31 4 Resident 136 27 3 Resident 17 65 8 Resident 47 46 6 Resident 77 37 5 Resident 107 31 4 Resident 137 27 3 Resident 18 64 8 Resident 48 46 6 Resident 78 37 5 Resident 108 31 4 Resident 138 26 3 Resident 19 61 8 Resident 49 46 6 Resident 79 36 5 Resident 109 30 4 Resident 139 26 3 Resident 20 61 8 Resident 50 45 6 Resident 80 36 5 Resident 110 30 4 Resident 140 26 3 Resident 21 59 7 Resident 51 45 6 Resident 81 36 5 Resident 111 30 4 Resident 141 26 3 Resident 22 57 7 Resident 52 45 6 Resident 82 36 5 Resident 112 30 4 Resident 142 26 3 Resident 23 56 7 Resident 53 44 6 Resident 83 36 5 Resident 113 30 4 Resident 143 26 3 Resident 24 55 7 Resident 54 44 6 Resident 84 36 5 Resident 114 30 4 Resident 144 25 3 Resident 25 54 7 Resident 55 44 6 Resident 85 36 5 Resident 115 30 4 Resident 145 25 3 Resident 26 53 7 Resident 56 43 5 Resident 86 35 4 Resident 116 29 4 Resident 146 25 3 Resident 27 53 7 Resident 57 43 5 Resident 87 35 4 Resident 117 29 4 Resident 147 25 3 Resident 28 52 7 Resident 58 43 5 Resident 88 35 4 Resident 118 29 4 Resident 148 25 3 Resident 29 51 6 Resident 59 43 5 Resident 89 35 4 Resident 119 29 4 Resident 149 25 3 Resident 30 51 6 Resident 60 43 5 Resident 90 35 4 Resident 120 29 4 Resident 150 25 3 Residents 151 thru 1133 6 1

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
April 16, 2026
To: City Council
From: Public Works Department
Prepared by: Dina Purvis, Public Works Director
Subject: Safer Streets Indian Wells Approval of 30% Design Plans RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council REVIEWS and APPROVES the proposed 30% design plans, as presented, or RECOMMENDS any additional changes to the proposed design to advance the project forward to completion; and
FINDS the action exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 21080.20, and Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

DISCUSSION:

The Safer Streets Project is being designed for the streets of Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street. The overarching goal of Safer Streets is to improve road safety for vehicular and non -vehicular (e.g., pedestrian and bicyclist) travel and reduce vehicular speeds along the routes. At the June 10, 2025, City Council meeting, Council approved the conceptual design of Safer Streets and authorized the completion of 30% design plans. (Attached is the June 10, 2025, staff report for reference. (Attachment No. 1))
The Safer Streets project is at 30% design plans (Attachment No. 2). Per Council direction, staff and the design consultants, GHD Inc, are presenting the 30% design plans for Council review, direction, and advancement to final design. The 30% design plan includes the following, based on Council's direction.

Phase I (Fairway Drive and Eldorado Drive):
• Fairway Drive
o Construct a 6' meandering sidewalk along the south side of Fairway Drive for

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
pedestrian safety.
o Sidewalk to be constructed out of a colored permeable concrete that looks like decomposed granite versus a conventional concrete sidewalk. o Stripe Fairway Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction, provide a combination 8' bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only), and maintain street parking on the north side of Fairway Drive.
• Eldorado Drive
o Striping Eldorado Drive to provide a combination 8' bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only).
o Addition of a meandering sidewalk from Highway 111 to Camino Cielo on the west side of Eldorado to the entrance of the Sundance community to mirror the Montelena Community sidewalk.
o Examine the addition of a northbound right turn pocket at Highway 111. o Install crosswalks at Fairway Drive crossing each leg of the intersection to Fairway Park. Additional research is needed to confirm whether these crosswalks can be installed, as they connect pedestrian improvements to non -pedestrian improved areas.

Phase II (Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street):
• Rancho Palmeras
o Construct a left turn pocket on southbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.
o Construct a right turn pocket on northbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.
o Stripe Rancho Palmeras to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and a combination 8' bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction. • Cook Street
o Implement a road diet and add 6' meandering sidewalks on both sides of Cook Street.
o Striping to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination 8' bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only).
■ Final design would include a two-lane to one -lane transition in both north and southbound lanes near Highway 111.
o Further traffic analysis needs to be conducted on additional Planning Commission recommendations for traffic signage on Cook Street and no right turn on red at Highway 111 onto Cook Street.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
o Eastbound Highway 111 to southbound Cook Street right turn restriction — No turn on Red
At the June 10, 2025 Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to combine both phases into one. The 30% design plans combine all segments into one overall project. These 30% design plans also represent minor requests made by the property owners adjoining the pathway on Fairway Drive. These requests include enlarging curb radii, driveway approach widening, paver crosswalks, and utility undergrounding.

Speed Study
Council also instructed staff to conduct a speed study along the Safer Streets segments and report back the findings to the City Council, to assist Council in their deliberations on additional design elements, including speed cushions, for the four segments.

Staff presented this follow up report at your December 2, 2025, Council meeting.

The report confirmed speeding was an issue along all four segments. At this meeting, Council also determined that speed cushions were not advantageous to the project.

Most of the speed and volume data was collected during the month of September 2025. These findings provide a data -driven basis for evaluating the need and urgency for traffic calming interventions on each segment.

Key findings included:
o Cook Street registered the highest traffic volume (18,855 vehicles over 7 days) but not the greatest percentage of vehicles exceeding the posted speed limit (An average of 62% of drivers over the posted speed limit of 35, both north and south bound). 1350 vehicles (7%) were over 45 mph. During last season, Cook Street had a 24 hour ADT volume total of 5,703, compared to the off-season 24 -hour ADT volume of 3196 on the highest day.
o Eldorado Drive had a moderate traffic volume (10,614 vehicles over 7 days), but had the highest speeding frequency (An average of 87% of drivers over the posted speed limit of 30, both north and south bound). 529 vehicles (4%) were over 45 mph. During last season, Eldorado Drive had a 24-hourADT volume total of 3,512, compared off-season 24 -hour ADT volume of 1,902 on the highest day.
o Fairway Drive West had a higher traffic volume (12,520 vehicles over 7 days) and a high speeding frequency (An average of 78% of drivers over the posted speed limit of 30, both east and west bound). 232 vehicles (1%) were over 45 mph. During last season, Fairway Drive West had a 24 -hour ADT volume total of 3,549, compared to the off-season 24 -hour ADT volume of 2,216 on the

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
highest day.
o Fairway Drive East had a slightly lower traffic volume than Fairway Drive West (10,560 vehicles over 7 days) with a lower speeding frequency (An average of 60% of drivers over the posted speed limit of 30, both east and west bound). 63 vehicles (less than 1/2 %) were over 45 mph. During last season, Fairway Drive East had a 24 hour ADT volume total of 3,478, compared to the off- season 24 -hour ADT volume of 1,900 on the highest day. o The remaining study streets showed low traffic volumes with lower rates of speed violations in comparison.
o Enforcement presence did not show a measurable reduction in speeds.

Discussions with Eldorado Country Club and the Vintage Club Over the past few months, staff has met with representatives of both the Eldorado Country Club and the Vintage Club on obtaining additional right-of-way along the south side of Fairway Drive to accommodate the meandering sidewalk. Conversations are ongoing and proceeding very well. Both clubs agree a meandering sidewalk is the preferred aesthetic versus a curb adjacent sidewalk. Both clubs also provided additional recommendations to improve the overall quality of the project (e.g., pavers in lieu of crosswalk stripping, undergrounding of utilities where appropriate, coordinating landscape design, etc.) and the importance to coordinate construction schedules to minimize impact on residents during season.

Eldorado Country Club has also expressed a willingness to improve ingress at their main gate from eastbound Fairway Drive, and ingress and egress at Eldorado Country Club's maintenance road. Improvements to these entrances and exits of the Eldorado Country Club will improve pedestrian and vehicle safety along the route.

The Vintage Club has also expressed support for improvements that enhance their entry at the corner of Cook and Fairway Drive. This includes a better alignment of eastbound Fairway Drive as you pass Cook. Extending a curb at this location will also improve pedestrian and vehicle traffic at this intersection. The Vintage Club has also requested, with which the City concurs, to have northbound Cook from Fairway, merge from two to one lane approximately 250 feet northbound on Cook. This will facilitate a safer transition for vehicles exiting the Vintage Club.

Action Items
Staff are seeking City Council's approval of the design elements for Safer Streets as presented in the 30% design plans, or to recommend any changes at this time.

It is important to note the importance of approving the 30% design plans, understanding that any future alterations to the street design will be costly to make and ultimately delay construction of the entire project.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Next Steps
o After Council's approval of the 30% design plans, as presented or with alterations, the design team and staff will progress the project to the 70% design plan stage. The next design phase will include development of utility and landscaping plans. Staff plans to bring the 70% design plans to the City Council in Fall 2026. o Staff will provide both clubs with an update and continue negotiations on acquiring the additional right -way, based on the recommendations from Council on the 30% design plans. Staff will also bring forth approvals to acquire the additional right-of- way at a future City Council meeting.
o Staff will engage property owners with affected frontage along the segments to discuss opportunities for coordination and partnership. o Each segment has different construction schedules.
• For example, Rancho Palmeras' proposed design is to repave and restripe the street, and the creation of a left turn and right turn pockets into Casa Dorado. If Rancho Palmeras is approved at the 30% design plans level, staff would recommend expediting this segment for construction in the late summer of 2026. • The remaining segments are expected to take longer to design and construct. Staff will bring forth a proposed construction timeline, to minimize disruption in the community, at the 70% design plans level for Council review and consideration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOAL:

The Safer Streets Project is a projected listed on the City Council approved Strategic Planning Goals (Goal #6, Investing in Infrastructure and Amenities).

OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options.

1. Accept the 30% design plans as is and direct staff to move design to 70% design plans.

2. Amend 30% design plan as directed by council and direct staff to move design to completion.

3. Accept or Amend the 30% design plan and direct staff to expedite the project through the design process, obtain construction estimates, and bring back the project once ready to go out to bid. (This would skip the requirement to bring back the 70% design plans for further discussion).

4. Provide alternative direction.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no additional fiscal impact associated with completing the designs, as it is funded under the approved Safer Streets budget in the Capital Improvement Program. The completion of design plans will allow for an engineer's construction estimate to be developed for future Council discussion and deliberations.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. The City, acting as Lead Agency, has determined that Under California Public Resources Code section 21080.20, CEQA does not apply to active transportation plans, pedestrian plans and bicycle transportation plans.

Furthermore, the proposed improvements within the existing street rights -of -way are categorically exempt under CEQA in accordance with Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, for Existing Facilities, including streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. City Council Staff Report of June 10, 2025

2. 30% Design Plans

CALIFORNIA
Safer Streets
30% Design Plans
M -
City Council Meeting:

April 16, 2026 - Presentation
General Business Item I.2

as AVMIII'dd
C)
"62-
Cn
G7
co

AZURE HILLS LN

PARADISE
0 VALLEY RD I
ea
r- -
1O+0O.-
r
C-110
15+00
C-108
2O+0C
C-108
i
- - -
0-109
r +30+02- �.
0-109
5+
a0.RJ3S30 031.NIVid
C-110
20+ 00
SS -104

COOK ST
0 m
C)
m
>
N11S naivis
SS -105

1.44 AVMHOIH
C-112 C-112
30+ 09 35.00 36+00`.
ti
0+00
SS -106

W ILLIAMS RD

CIELITO DR
Cx
0-113
a(ivativiiv
0-113
15+00
n
SS -1O8
20+00
SS -106

RANCHO PALMERAS DR
0-114
25+00- -
C-114
O13IO ONIIAIV3
SS -107
C -115 -
C-115-
35+50
SS 108

EL DORADO DR
SS -109

pe$i n
IACCOSpecial
modatio�is
01 Utility Relocation
02 Paver Crosswalks
03 Turn Lanes
Lengthening of
Road Diet Taper
05 Landscaping

Right -of -way
Importance to Design
Impact of Changes
to Project Schedule
if si
•• ..
• .•
•
• .•
.
.
.
.
.

HOA
Negotiations
..*
Maintenance

CONT - SEE SHEET C-107

Q SHEET KEYNOTES
SEE C-107 FOR COOK

STREET LAYOUT PLAN
EX. CURB AND GLITTER
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
10+00
r La,
'FAIRWAY DR" 10+00.00
"COOK ST" 10+00.00

ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING

COORDINATION IS PLANNED

FOR THE NEXT SUBMITTA-
04� EX CURB AND GUTTER

EX, CURB AND GUTTER
r
21'
Lam-.

EX, Riw
PROP. RAN
0 10 20
10 20'
40'
40'
r4)
0 co
10, SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.

OAC OVERLAY
aTYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200. • CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN NO, 208. 'V CURB
✓ UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
07 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
QCROSS GLITTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210.

V DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209
0 CURB OUTLET

OCURB INLET
LEGEND
p4�pOQbyO
o°.opOoa,

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109A0
SBO°5733°E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11+09.40
12+39.71

13.66.03 256.632
600.00
568°42'21'E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13+66.03
15+48.11
17+19.58
353.554
600.00
573°20'01°E
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+62.03
542.45
N89°47,06"E
C3
TP
IP
TP
22+62.03
22+88.46
23+14.87

52.847
1300.00
N88°37'15"E
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+26.26
113.39
N87°2T23"E
C4
TP
IP
TP
24+28.26
24+54.39
24+80.51

52.251
1300.00
N88°36'28"E
L4
BP
EP
24+80.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89"45'33"E
C5
TP
IP
TP
61-62.92
62+56.56
63+45.92
183.000
350.00
N74°46'50"E
L5
BP
EP

63.45.92 64+22.92

77.00 N59°48'06"E
CO
TP
IP
TP
64+22.92
64+71,50
65+19.24

96.320
300.00
N68.59"58"E
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24
66+49.75
130.52
N78°11'51"E
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES
U
I -
CC
ca
'FAIRWAY DR' LINE
I

18.00 10'
19+00
20+00
10'

FAIRWAY DRIVE
EXRNY— \z
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
21 EX.CURB AND GUTTER
2 0
10'
W
d
co
W
Si)
VAR
8'
- kM
C
rr
B'
23+00 19
'FAIRWAY DR' LINE
21,00
10'
10'
4E 4
C4
W
-J_Sz5
EX. RIW
Mit I=
EX. CURB AND GLITTER
26+00
lig Lill
1 LJJ

FAIRWAY DRIVE

EX CURBAND GUTTER
27 27
a
J
2 CD
C)
CI)
�0.
0 SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO 205.

OAC OVERLAY
OTYPE A -S CURB AND CUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD_ P LAN NO.200.

OCURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.
05 CURB
0 UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
iJ DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UND
0 CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210.

0. DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLANNO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET

OCURB INLET
LEGEND
r

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE 'FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP

10.410.00
11+09.40
109.40
380°5733'E
TP
11+09.40
C1
IP
12+39.71
256.632
600.00
568'4221'E
TP
13+66.03
TP
13+66.03
C2
IP
15+48.11
353.554
600.00
073'2O01'E
TP
17+19`55
12 BR
EP
17+19,'58
22+62.03
542,45
N89 -4708'E
IF
22+6203
C3
IP
22+68.48
52847
1300.00
NB8'3T15'E
IP
23+14.87
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+2826
113.39
187°27'23'E
TP
24+2628
C4
IP
24+54.39
52251
1300!00
NOS'35'28'E
IP
24+80.31
BP
24+80.51
LI
EP
B1+8292
3682.41
N89°45'33'E
TP
61+62.92
C5
IP
62+5656
183.000
35000
N74°46'50'E
IP
63+4592
L5
BP
EP

63.45.92 64+2292

77.00 N59°48YIGE
TP
64+2292'
CS
IP
64+71.50

96.320
300.00
N6$°59r58'E
TP
65+19.24
L6
BP
EP
65+1924
56+49.75.
130.52
tar 11'511
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES

EX CURB AND GUTTER
U
LJ
LUJ
w 90LJLI
J
I—
25+00
'FAIRWAY DR' LINE

29.00 U
17 1Y
8`
8'
0 J
Cn
L1J
31+00 32!
LLI
30400
10 EX. CURB AND GUTTER

FAIRWAY DRIVE
10•
s i M
I _

EX RAN
PROP. R9W :

RN 0
EX.. CURBAND GUTTER
vY
4 'FAIRWAY DR' LINE 33.03
34+00
RELOCATE ET. TRASH CAN
W
i
a
15 29
43'
i
8'
35+011
1P'
EX. CURB AND GUTTER

FAIRWAY DRIVE
15 Sic
8 3
LL I
CI}
LLl
J
EX.
■ PROP. RAN
cr
7n
U
0 10
0 SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 203.
0 AC OVERLAY
1_ / TYPE A£ CURB AND RUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD- PLAN NO. 200. { 4 } CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 248. ''LI CURB

V MU TY TO BE RELOCATED
0 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE I N'KIND 0140
4 ) CROSS GUTTER PER CITY Of INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN Na 210.

DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO.209.
40 CURB OUTLET

OCURB INLET
LEGEND

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP 1 11+09.40
10+00.04
109A0
S80°5733"E
TP
11+09.40
Ct
IP

12.39.71 256.632
600.00
S68°4221'£
TP
13+66.03
TP
13+68.03
02 IP
15+48.11
363.581
800.00
673°21101.5
TP
17+19.58
BP
EP
1F+18.58
22+82.03
5422 45
N89'47'OB'E
TP
22+82.03
C3
IP
22+88-48
52847
1300.00
N88°37'15'E
TP
23+14.87
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+28,28
113.39
N87°2723"E
TP
24+28-26
C4
IP
24+5439
52251
4300.00
N08°3E28'E
TP
24+8051
L4
BP
EP
24+8051
61+8292
3482.41.

N89°45.33 E
TP
61+8292
C5
IP
6256.56
163,040
35004
N74°46'50'E
TP
63+45-92
15 BP
EP
63+4592
64+2292

77.00 N59°48°06'E
TP
64+2292
CS
IP
64+71.50

98.328
300.08
145061'56E
TP
65+1924
L6
BP
EP
65+19,24
66+49.75
130.52
N78°11'51'E
30% DESIGN

CANT - SEE SHEET C-110
▪ SHEET KEYNOTES
C!3
7 0
F -
w
LY_
'RANCHO PALMERAS D

37.00 S
SEE 0.110 FOR RANCHO

PALMERAS DRIVE

LAYOUT PLAN

4.7 12'
a
39,00

MANZO ROAD
`FAIRWAY DR' LINE
n� 1 -L-1
� J '
`—ter
EX. R'1W

EX CURB AND GUTTER
41-30
'FAIRWAY DR' 37+02 73.
'RANCHO PALMERAS 16.00

FAIRWAY DRIVE

EX CURB AND GUTTER
LJJ
}
0 CO
LU
C') l
LLI
J _
U _
r
9 12'
9 Fx 131W
I
42+00

44.00 -..kWAY
45,00
46,00

FAIRWAY DRIVE
I0'
U

EX G..9AND GUTTER
M.
0 217'
Orr
C7

MATCHLINE -
✓ SIDEWALK PER. CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.

O AC OVERLAY
CTYPE AB CIJRB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200.

Lf CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 296.

Y ./ CURB
& ] i UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED

CF DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE I N KIND LINO
0 CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO.210. ( DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN NO.2L6.

CI CURB OUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND

MINOR CONCRETE

VEIIC ULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE 'FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE.

TAG

CIHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
16,0006
11+09.46
10940
S80°5 33-' E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11,09 40
12+39.71

13.66 03
256.632
BMOC
$66°4221'E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13,08 03
15,48.11
17+19,58
353.554
600.00
573°2001'E

1.2 BP
EP
1719.56
22+fi203
54245
NKr 470 E
CS
TP
IP
TP
22+82.03
22+68.46
23+1487
52647
130000
N68'37'15'E
L3
BP
EP
2314.87

21.2826
113.39
N6r27°23'E
C4
TP
IP
TP
24+26.26
24+54.39
24+80.51
52251
1300.00
NOB'36'28'E
I.4
BP'
EP
24+80.51
61+82.92
366241
NOT 45'33'E
C5
TP
IP
TP
61+62.92
62+5656
63+45.92
163.040
350.00
N74°4EW0
BP
EP
63+45.92
64+2282
7700
N59'46166`E
C6
TP
IP
TP

64.2202
64+71.50
65,19 24

96.320
300.00
N68. 59'68'E
L6
BP
EP
05+19 24
66+49.75
130.52
Iva. 1151T
30% DESIGN

C.5
LLJ
LLJ
Cl)
10'
20'
40'
)RIVE
Lu
z
J
C,)
I-
Q
IMIEUTX. CURB AND GUTTER

DRIVEWAY PER COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE STD. NO. 207A
PORTION OF EX. WALL TO BE
DEMOLISHED,.

EX. CURB EDGE TO BE REALIGNED.

ADDITIONAL TOPO SURVEY

NEEDED AT NEXT PHASE
ES. CURB AND GUTTER
! PROP. RAW
'4 E
L

FAIRWAY DRIVE

FIRWAY DRIVE
0 49 -POD
54+O0
PROP. RAN
EX. CURB AND GUTTER

EX, CURB AND GUTTE
"FAIRWAY DR" LINE
55+00
8'
56+03
10'
O o
O
0 o o
12'
8'
10' 51+00
0 10'
20 43
1 MATCHLINE - SEE C-106

O SHEET KEYNOTES
0 SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205

V AC OVERLAY
OTYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200.

OCURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.

O CURB

OUTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
0 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
0e CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN ND. 210.

O DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.

OCURB CUTLET

OCURB INLET
LEGEND
oa°oop4oa�

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109.40
S80°57'33"E
TP
11+09.40
Cl
IP
12+39.71
256.632
600.00
568°42'21"E
TP
13+66.03
TP
13+66.03
C2
IP
15+48.11
353,554
600.00
S73°20'01"E
TP
17+1958
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+52.03
542.45
N89°47.08"E
TP
22+62.03
C3
IP
22+88.46

52.847
1300.00
N88°37'15"E
TP
23+14.87
L3
BP
EP
23+14.67
24+28.28
113.39
N87°27.23"E
TP
24+28.26
C4
IP
24+54.39
52251
1300.00
N88'36'28"E
TP
24+50.51
L4
BP
EP
24+$0.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89"45'33'E
TP
61+82.92
C5
IP
62+56.56
183.000
350.00
N74°46'50"E
TP
63+45.92
L5
BP
EP
63+45.92
64+22.92

77.00 N59°48'06"E
TP
64+22.92
C6
IP
64+71.50

90.320
300.00
N68°59'58"E
TP
65+1924
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24
66+49.75
130.52
N78'11'511E
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES
L()

TCHLINE - SEE C-
0 5r -CO
O
W
4,/ 7,
8+00 59+0C
f°
EX. RAN
cPr

EX CURB AND GUTTER
"FAIRWAY DR" LINE
EX. CURE AND GUTTER

FAIRWAY DRIVE
CONT - SEE SHEET 0-113
SEE C-113 FOR
• ELDORADO DRIVE .

LAYOUT PLAN
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
04+00
"FAIRWAY DR" 63+72.19
"EL DORADO OR" 10+00, 00
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
oil
I J
EX. CURB AND GUTTER -
60+00 "FAIRWAY DR" LINE
Q
J
W
/OW
EX. CURB AND GUTTER

PROP, RIW
// f
0 10'
20'
40'
18 66+00
0 f°
�� __ �— per--
fn _ fn __=N
0 17 27
42 MATCHLINE - SEE BELOW
86+50
09 SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205,

OAC OVERPAY
QTYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200.

OCURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO,. 208.

O CURB
/-- t y� UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED

ODECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
QCROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 219.

V DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND
oopOQo°coy

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DELECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
Li
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+0940
109.40
S80°5733'E
TP

11.09.40 C1
IP
12+39.71
256.632
600.00
568°4721"E
TP
13+66.03
TP
13+66.03
C2
IP
15+48.11
353.554
600.00
573°20'01"E
TP
17+19.58
L2
BP
ER
17+19.58
22 62.03
542.45
N69°4T118"E
TP
22+62.03
C3
IP
22+88.46

52.847
1300.00
N88°3715"E
TP
23+14.87
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+28.26
11339
N87° 27.23T
TP
24+28.26
04 IP
24+54.39

52.251
1300.00
N88°36'28"E
TP
24+80.51
L4
OP
EP
24+80.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89°45'33"E
TP
61+62.92
C5
IP
62+55.56
183.000
350.00
N74°46"50"E
TP
63+45.92
BP
63+45.92
L5
EP
64+22.92

77.00 N59°46'067
TP
64+22.92
06 IP
64+71.50

96.320
300.00
N68°59'58"E
TP
65+19.24
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24

66.40.75 130.52
N78°19'S1'E
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES

EX RN /

MIATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVE RS
'COOL( ST' f0+G0.00=
'FAIRWAY DR' 10+00.00

FAIRWAY DRIVE
.41
SEE 0101 FOR FAIRWAY

DRIVE LAYOUT PLAN
"I $71:

CONT - SEE SHEET C-101
Ex RAY
�-,4 ~• -
10 10'
11 12'
10 10'

ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING

COORDINATION IS PLANNED

SOP THE NEXT SUBMITTAL

EX, RAN
'COOK Sr LINE
•
r
12+00

EX CURE AND GUTTER

COOK STREET

EX CURB AND GUTTER

EX RAY
0 15%

EX MEDIAN —,

CHATEAU CIRCLE
0 J
LU
L!J
RU
Ra AND GUrIFP
14,02
IMF
10'
EX. MEDIAN ISLAND
15+00
Li
17 8
,0'
0 O n14 1B,C.0
e 0 `•

COOK STREET
'0:705: ST' LN'

EX MEDIAN ISLAND C
uJ
16�LLI
U)
�w
2,
9'
EX_ CURB AND GI T T L F'
EX. RA!
•
f jJ
0 H
0 SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO.205.

CAG OVERLAY
V TYPE A.6 CURB AND GLITTER PER CITY GF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO.200. 0_.+' CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 20B.

LA CURB
) UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
[ F ] DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND IMNQ
OCROSS GUTTER PER. CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NQ- 210. 0 DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 201

O CURB CUTLET
CoCURB INLET
LEGEND

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "COON ST" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHWNAC,'E
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
Li
BP
EP
1O40O0
35+00.00
2500.00
N00°09'36'E
0 10
20 40
i
30% DESIGN

r EX. MEDIAN ISLAND

EX RAN
f,.

LL
LLJ
I°°
LU
J
0 —
81 _
r
10 L1
'COOK ST LINE
17 26«(70
•41g EX CURB AND GUTTER
y 7 f r . y: _ V�
21+03
22+02
0 s J
LU
CO
LLV
231 LU
I CO
LLJ
0 I -

COCK STREET
10 2
8'

ER CJRB AND GUTTER
s i i
LLI
0 00
LJJ
LJJ
Cl)
LJJ
z
U
I —
10'
10'
7 A
EX. RAN
•
9 'COOK Sr LINE
0 COOK STREET
66 •
0 17
20 40'

EX CURB AN0GUTTER
2 10'

EX MEDIAN ISLAND
27+06
J.
12' I
EX. CURB AND GUTTER

EX RN.'
0 10
20 4':1

O SHEET KEYNOTES
w
0 m
w
w
CI]
w
J
al
w
Ir
p
0 a �
LL
'FAIRWAY DR' 37402 73 =
'RANCHO PALMERAS DR' 10*53 00
w
w w
19,
0 C -
w0 —w w
'n
Lf 1i,00 12
"RANCHO PALM ERAS DR' LINE
10100
SEE C-104 FOR FAIRWAY

DRIVE LAYOUT PLAN
■
s1�L
RANCH© PALMERAS DRIVE
J'
4 1 r
14 no

Q Q DO Q

COMM COVE COWL/ - -
0 1V
40'
'OMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM

MATCHLINE
0, SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS. STD. PLAN N0.205.

OAC OVERLAY
'1=_f TYPE A.& CURS AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN NO. 200.

OCURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 206.

O CURB
& UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
O-+� DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND LWO
� CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210. ,�15)
v(9 ) DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO.209, 10 CURB OUTLET
�i CURB INLET
LEGEND

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE
vgiQaa.po DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE'RANCHO PALMERAS OR° LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
Li
8P
EP
10403 00
26,00.00
200000
N00°10'04'E
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES
C--
C
I -
W
w
C,)
W
w
U)
J
CJ
I -
W
0 [i7
W
LLI
(/)
J
0 I—
— COMM
COMM- _ ., C_OMM CQMM
25+60
0 0
<
rC
J
©MM
!A C - COMM
CONY

COMM COMM
f — — — — � _ � --- WNW — —CQW L —U -.COWL — _ C0M—C—i��.OM� _ _MA — 'RAN HO PALME RAS OR' LINE
/
/
Cedowm
LGtom 6OK}}}A. .
/
EX. MEDIAN ISLAND
/
COMM
0 10' 20'
n �
OM',k COM'A9
40 COMM
I;-7 »N‘''' ‘‘\.\\. \\\\\NN\\\\N.L\\\Y
W�-W W W
•
CQM.0 r-- =CORM - (]MN — COMM COItAM— �^q„CAMIL
C7MM CONM
Dmv
28,00
NM G :M C '.Wik"1- — COMM —
AC+
() SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD PLAN NO, 205,
0 AC OVERLAY
OTYPE A -B CURB AND CUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. P LAN NO. 200. 1J' CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN ND. 206.

C/ CURB

C) UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
0 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
0 CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210. 'ti=1' DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN No. 201

OCURB CUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND
r
P6n#�b °�O46?
°gni

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAYERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE 'RANCHO PALMERAS DR" LINE ANI) CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
Li
BP
EP
10+0100
341+00.00
280000
NOO" 10'0m'E
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES

STARDUST LANE
' r �
*COMP C MP — COMP c COMM . - -COMM--- COMM COMA+. COMM COMP COMM COMP COMM COMP= ' OMM CO"
COMM
- C - - - - - C - - - -.

R
L1
22•CA -C:O
w
r. W
M
0 0

RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE

EX MEDIAN ISLAND
-
(\��J COM4 COMM COW( 0 COMM COIWM I.OMM COM7ut BMi' tnu, COMM CO M - COMM - COMM GOM1A COM•.+ifer CO CO' 0O41! Co77•M COMM COMM COMM COMM. - COMM --00MM - 0 14i�6MICr CC111A SC MM
mac!
LiJ
- COMP

COMM COMP - COMM CO
'RANCHO RALMERAS DR' LINE
EX. MEDIAN ISLAND
Iv RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE
/
0 0
�E.
�.r
COY
2:14>
0 w
J
U
0 SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.
0 AC OVERLAY
0 TYPE A-6 CURB AND CUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN NO. 200 OCURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.
50 CURB

V UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED

L DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
CROSS GLITTER PER CITY OF IN0PAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210. 0 DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO.2TS.

OCURB OUTLET

OCURB INLET
LEGEND
4w0 �4 D�
a9.,a°Qn°On

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "RANCHO RALMERAS DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
LI
BP
EP
#470.00
36,00, 00
2600,00
N0CT10'0G'E
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES
� I
I -
W
W
U 0
W
W
U0
0 13'
23'
?0'
3AI U V I I WV11
'ELDORADO DR' LNE
`FAIRWAY DR' 83+7219=
`EL DORADO DR' 10.D0.Bs7■
1,0
74 O
SEE &106 FOR FAIRWAY

DRIVE LAYOUT PLAN
15+4C
AGM

ELDORADO DRIVE
:

COMM CONY
11+00
WLDORADO DR" LINE
coo
r�conifr
12+00
L2�
V

ELDORADO DRIVE
%1',111
{
17+'0

COMM COMM
V T V
COMM
^2
13+C'3

COMM COMM
ICI1MM COMM - COMP'
rTh0 0
alVICTia - RAII0 M $0}ct Yd �01Aid 4 MtM
14+00
0 J
J
W
L LI
C!O

NIATCHLINE -
Cp,MM^ COMM
W
W
:Cr)
W
15+00 19+00 W
E%. MEDIAN ISLAND
0 10'
COMM O COL"'
COMM
20'
40 et SIDEWAL%PER CITY OF INM+AN WELLS STD. PLAN NO 205.

OAC OVERLAY
OTYPE A-0 CURE AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, P LAN NO. 200. aCURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 296.
0 CURB

OUTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
(7-�3 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND LINO
�- L[ R 71 CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210.

ODRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN NO. 209.

OCURS CUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND
qaOBp'4dQ

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAYERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE

LINE 'EL DORADO DR' LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

COINNAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
8P
EP
10 40.40
15+42.89
542:39
NOT 14'44`E
CI
TP
IP 1 15+73.98
TP

15.42.89 15.04.99

62.096
500.00
NO3'1B'45'W
L2
BP
EP
16+44.99
17+29.73
124.74
N06°52'13'W
C2
TP
IP
TP
17+29.73
17+51.49
17+73,19
43453
350!00
N'.03° 1846"9
L3
BP
EP

17.73.19 a5.60.00.
1776.81
N'00°14'41'E
30% DESIGN

0' SHEET KEYNOTES
LLI
W
CO
W
W
W
z
0 F -

MATCH LI NE
c;a9MA� vi VN G;�,N�i ., AAR
f
I
20+40 21+O3
EX. MEDIAN ISLAND
22+Oil
23+03

ELDORADO DRIVE
c — LII
0 UJ
24+00
'ELDORADO DR' LINE
COMM
COMM "OIFM COMM COMM

COMM COMM
CONN
COMM
CONY
0 'ELDORADO DR' LINE
F
\\

ELDORADO DRIVE
0 0 00 0 cp
EX. MEDIAN ISLAND
y
L3
f 0'

MATCHLINE - SEE BELOW
jILI
W
CO
W
W
t)
W
�2
— — — — s s _ _ _ — — — — — — — — I—
M
COMM COMM __-_— 1 M COMM (ANN COMM, GUM4 CONN CONN CONK, COMM COM. - COMM COMM COMM COMM — ^OMM COMM
r� 1

CUMM COMM
COMM
:GMM COMM COMM CONK
COMM COMN I .M COMM COMM
L r,
4IY
0 SIDEWALK PER CITY Of INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.
0 AC OVERLAY
,� TYPE A-6 CURB AND GUI I ER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO.203. f d 1 CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO, 206. 0 CURB
4 UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
0 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND LINO
4 CROSS GUTTER P511 CRY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN 140.210.

O DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO- 209.
0 CURB OUTLET
0 CURB INLET
LEGEND

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE
I )%aa4°ado DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "EL DORADO DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
Lt
BP
EP

10.00.00 542
13+42.89
69 NOT 14'44"E
TP

13.4289
C1
IP

15.73.08 62.068
50000
NO3'18'45'W
TP
16+04.99
L2
9P
EP
164-04.89 124.74
17+29.73
N06'57t3NY
TP
17+29.73
C2
IP
17+51.49

43.463
350.00
nor 18'46'W
TP
17+73.19
U
BP
EP

17.73.19 35+50.00
1776.81
NOT 1441'E
30% DESIGN

O SHEET KEYNOTES
0 SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN NO. 205.

C')
Fri
T-
0 M COMM ) COMM -
3C+03 " 314D 'ELDORADO DR' LINE 32+
33+00
00 I
EX_ MEDIAN ISLAND J
AM Mlle

ELDORADO DRIVE
` COhIM C'AYI
CX. MEDIAN ISLAND
35+00 - 'ELDORADO DR' LINE

ELDORADO DRIVE

EX MEDIAN ISLAND
y
00++14 Cam H. 7L1
35+50
4L4 AVMHOIH
W
0 ID
20'
40 2
w
I
I
0 AC OVERLAY
OTYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. no 0 CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.

O CURB

OUTILITY TO BE RELOCATED

O DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND LINO
OCROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD, PLAN NO. 210. ✓ DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.

O CURB OUTLET

OCURB INLET
LEGEND
:O 4:
�� p4�©0..

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAYERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "EL DORADO DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG
CIaAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
8P
EP
10+1]0.00
15+42.89
542.89
NOD' 14.44'E
C1
TP
IP
TP
15+42.82

15.73.98 16+04.99
52098
500.00
NO3'18"45'W
12 BP
EP
16+04.99
17+29.73
12474
N08"5213'W
C2
TP
IF'
TP
17+29.73
17+51.49
17+73.19

43.483
350.00
NO3°18'46'W
L3
&P
EP
17+73.14
35+50.90
1776.81
N00°14'41'E
10'
2o'
300/n DESIGN

•�y

EICE TRANSION CALCULATION

INSTALL

CURB RAMP
Ex. SIG
Raltcr,)
Rs1B(CA)
EX.

STORM
qtr
EX. SIGN
R1-1
IX. SIGN
'011-1
M6 -1R
EX. SIGN
r'NO HOTEL
rI ACCESS
EX.
4R2-1(30)
1 SIDEWALK

DC CURB
AND
GUTTER
la. SIGN E%. SIGN
*74(C) R26(C/0 EX
SIGN
-1(35

PISTILLL

CURB RAMP
E?L SIGN
W1-3
12' 1 CC CURB
11'

EL CURB
MO
GUTTER
EX. CURB
AND

GLITTER
IX. SIGN
P03-1

INSTALL

CURB RAP

ELDORADO DRIVE

ELDORADO DRIVE
Ia. CURB
AND
GUTTER
E4. SIGN
R3-7
EL
R4-7
OA11-3
INSPLL
CURB MO .-
GU11ER

ELDORADO DRIVE

PRELIMINARY LAYOUT - ALT I

INSTALL

SIDEWALK
R1W-
L - - (3F 1+14 - - 210'
USE 210'
245° MERGE TAPER
E{. SIGN
DI1-1
M6-3
EX. SIGN 11;
w75A(Ch) I
0 SYMBOL LEGEND

TRAFFIC SIGNAL

WI SIGN

CONCRETE
AC
0 20 40 20 I20
S,AI.f.' 1"-40'

PRELIMINARY

STORM
DRAIN
12' INSTALL
- CURB AND -
GUTTER
13'
13'
11'

ELDORADO DRIVE

EXISTING SIGN LEGEND
71 El
MB -3 M6-1 M6_4
25 MPH

BIKE LANE
W13 -1P R81(CA)
R5-2
R4-7
W73A{CA)

RIGFITWE
MUST

TURN RIGHT
WI -4(L)
END
W74(CA) R81B(CA)
SPEED
LIMIT
30 R2-1
'o o o]
OIM1-3 0M2 -1H
IX. CURB
AND
GUTTER

INSTALL

SIDEWALK

INSTALL

CURB AND
GUTTER
P4STALL

CURB RAMP
_ RAN
13' 1
13'
- - 11'
NO

PAR(YNC
AN
TIME
R26(CA)
Ols NY
STOP
R1-1

BIKE ROUTE,
D11-1
R6 -1R
W3-1
WI
IX. SIGN
-3
E% CURB

INSTALL

CURB RAMP
AVSTILL SNr`RI
SIDEWALK - - SIGN _
R26(Cy) R2 R2
R2 -1(30)
12'
13'
RAN
12'
3 M6-3 HIGH
M6-4 PRESSURE
GAS
PIPELINE"
Ex.

STORM
DRAIN
IX. SIGN
R5-2
\\>I
91 \E%, CURS
.AH7
GUTTER

4. 1•L. AVAAHOIH

ELDORADO DRIVE

PRELIMINARY LAYOUT - ALT I

SYMBOL LEGEND

TS TRAFFIC SIGNAL
• SIGN

DGNCRETE
AC
0 20 40 80 120
SCALE:1 40'

PRELIMINARY

Grant Funding -Safer Streets hAt
rants i pprove•
(SB 821, HSIP)
rants
(CMAQ
i ppie.
& ATP)
ost o pavement
(All 4 Streets)
ost stimate
(All 4 Streets)
$3,498,334
$19,794,201
$3,000,000
$7,950,000

Upcoming Steps
Landscape
Consideration
for All Streets
Completion of
Right -of -Way
Negotiations
Can any streets
move ahead in
construction
schedule?

37376v3vZVv4V3v vAV571/WV VAV /
�in�����i��in�����%�����n��a'���n✓n67AL .<
37373Vnn757573VZYN5VZRVNYoVZY3a.ZZ� r�«����..�Tit�_�E74/V.\P_�n�%�Vn��������n�n�n96�n�% u� nVnCIQM)< nn 76V3V515 .\_/Z
PAgr/A\r/P���U67A��n�%�VAWMAYZ 73 7a rgYar21 51ZZYSLR23 WCR7NAqaW%UM 25 73 75 73 OVia%rvn�n�IPAV& MS32-37a��;2ar��{��rQ?ZZDLVS3QVSZ V V6V3737 "V37 V V V3VAV__WS7373V5/ _ �.,�.4L.< _ v-4_1\/ W VAVV- VVA7 VA7N
OO
1 7/17A
°• "A7,73 �� ./�i' �• A. A A + A ' /1 r" r' ' - /A e 14/\';‘-' '4 A T+

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
ATTACHMENT #1

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025
To: City Council
From: Public Works Department
Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, Public Works Director
Subject: Selection of Design Components for Safer Streets Program Along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council REVIEWS the Planning Commission recommended Right -of -Way improvements along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Cook Street and Rancho Palmeras; and PROVIDES individual motions for design improvements for each of the four corridors; and
AUTHORIZE staff to solicit proposals for a design consultant; and FINDS the action exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 21080.20, and Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

DISCUSSION:

Over the past few years, the City of Indian Wells has been developing the Safer Streets Program, which was identified to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, seek opportunities to reduce speeding in the community, and address unsafe vehicular activities in the residential areas. The project is a result of residents expressing concerns about traffic issues in this area of the City, specifically along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street. These concerns were also reiterated during the community engagement process for the City -Wide Traffic Safety Study and the Safer Streets outreach.

From February 2023 to May 2025, the City conducted 18 meetings related to Safer Streets. This includes City Council, Planning Commission, Strategic Planning, and Community Engagement Meetings to seek community input to receive input from the public and provide feedback on potential improvements.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025
Initially, the project was separated into two phases with Phase I consisting of Eldorado Drive and Fairway Drive, and Phase II consisting of Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street.

At this year's City Council Strategic Planning Session, the City Council combined the two projects to develop a comprehensive project that would provide a clear perspective of the proposed improvements to each corridor. Community feedback was provided via the City's website, public testimony at the meetings, emails, etc.

On May 29, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission was presented the combined phases of the project, including a report on stop sign warrants.

Based on previous direction to analyze potential stop signs at the intersections on each of the four corridors, a traffic engineer conducted a Stop Warrant Study to determine if additional stop signs were "warranted" under the conditions established under state traffic laws. Based on the preliminary results of the study, none of the 18 intersections qualified for additional stop signs. Once the draft study has been finalized, it will be available on the Safer Streets website.

The following information is presented as follows: Phase I streets from the Public's perspective then the Planning Commission's recommendation followed by Phase II streets with the Public's perspective followed by the Planning Commission's recommendation.

It is important to note that throughout the community meetings, numerous compliments were given to Riverside County Sheriff's Department for their traffic enforcement efforts.

However, a common theme from the community was a desire to increase traffic enforcement throughout the community.

Phase I (Fairway Drive and Eldorado Drive):
• Fairway Drive
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community's preference to be:
• Fairway Drive (Staff Presented Design Components;:
o Construct a meandering sidewalk along the south side of Fairway Drive for pedestrian safety.
o Sidewalk to be constructed out of a colored permeable concrete that looks like decomposed granite versus a conventional concrete sidewalk. o Stripe Fairway Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction, provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only), and maintain street parking on the north side of Fairway Drive.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025
• Fairway Drive (Planning Commission Recommendation;
Planning Commission concurred with the Staff Presented Design Components listed above but also included additional recommendations.
o Specified that the sidewalk should be 8 foot wide.
o Addition of crosswalks connecting Fairway to Cook Street and Eldorado Drive. The inclusion of crosswalks connecting Fairway to Cook Street and Eldorado Drive are subject to state law for pedestrian safety. Additional research is needed to confirm if crosswalks can be installed that connect pedestrian improvements to non - pedestrian improved areas.
• Fairway Drive (Other Items)
Other items discussed at community meetings but not advanced by the Planning Commission.
o Discussion on potential to add speed bumps/humps along Fairway, and additional crosswalks on Fairway at Cielito, Williams and Rancho Palmeras. o The level of meandering path between Cook and Eldorado will be based upon the level of participation from Eldorado Country Club and Vintage Club. At this time, Eldorado Country Club has been open to having the meandering sidewalk in front of their property, while Vintage Club has expressed concerns. Moving forward, staff will work closely with both clubs to ascertain a willingness to expand beyond the City's right-of-way along Fairway to increase the level of meandering and curb adjacent landscaping into the design.
• Eldorado Drive
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community's preference to be:
• Eldorado Drive Staff Presented Design Components;:
o Implement a road diet by striping Eldorado Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only).
o No sidewalk on either side of the street nor reduction of pavement along Eldorado.

Rather, provide more striping that creates a wide buffer between bicycle/golfcart lane and vehicular traffic.
o No interest in revisiting pedestrian paths down the middle of the street.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025
• Eldorado Drive (Planning Commission Recommendation;
Planning Commission eliminated the Staff Presented Design Components listed above but instead included new recommendations.
o Addition of a meandering sidewalk from Highway 111 to Camino Cielo on the west side of Eldorado to the entrance of the Sundance community to mirror the Montelena Community sidewalk.
o Examine the addition of a northbound right turn pocket at Highway 111. o Install crosswalks at Fairway Drive crossing each leg of the intersection to Fairway Park. Additional research is needed to confirm whether these crosswalks can be installed, as they too connect pedestrian improvements to non -pedestrian improved areas.
• Eldorado Drive (Other Items)
Other items discussed at community meetings but not advanced by the Planning Commission.
• Reduce Eldorado Drive from two lanes in each direction and relocate curbs into existing number 2 travel lane to increase the landscape buffer on each side. • Construct a meandering sidewalk on the west side of Eldorado Drive.

Phase II (Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street):
• Rancho Palmeras
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community's preference to be:
• Rancho Palmeras (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Construct a left turn pocket on southbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.
o Construct a sidewalk on the west side of Rancho Palmeras for pedestrian safety. o Stripe Rancho Palmeras to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction.
• Rancho Palmeras (Planning Commission Recommendation;
o Accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). o Construct a left turn pocket on southbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025
o Construct a right turn pocket on northbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.
• Cook Street
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community's preference to be:
• Cook Street (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Implement a road diet and add meandering sidewalks on both sides of Cook Street.
o Striping to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). • The final design would include a two-lane to one -lane transition in both north and southbound lanes near Highway 111.
• Cook Street (Planning Commission Recommendation; :
o Implement a road diet and add meandering sidewalk on east side of Cook Street.

Curb to be rounded.
o Striping to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). o Camera installation on IW Coffee Building to monitor traffic and speeds. o Appropriate signage on northbound and southbound Cook Street providing advanced notice of the upcoming merge from two to one lane. o "No U-turn" signage on southbound Cook Street on median noses at Indian Wells Village.
o Eastbound Highway 111 to southbound Cook Street right turn restriction — No turn on Red
• Cook Street (Other Items;
Additional discussion at community meetings about traffic traveling eastbound along Highway 111 not obeying the right turn -only lane at Cook Street. Staff indicated that this is a separate project that will be examined at a later date.

Further traffic analysis needs to be conducted on additional Planning Commission recommendations for traffic signage on Cook Street and no right turn on red at Highway 111 onto Cook Street.

Addition of a camera at IW Coffee Building needs further discussion on purpose of camera, legal restrictions of placing on private property, costs for storage or footage, etc.

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025
Planning Commission also recommended additional traffic enforcement for traffic violations.

With the completion of community outreach and Planning Commission providing a holistic series of recommendations for Safer Streets, as well as the necessary CEQA and consistency of this project to the City's General Plan Circulation Element, staff is seeking Council's direction on the final design elements for each segment: Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street.

Residents are encouraged to learn more about the Safer Street project, community meetings held, public comments and other documents related to the project at https://www.cityofindianwells.org/city-hall/departments/public-works/safer-streets- indian-wells
OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options:
• Approve the Planning Commission recommendations as listed above, and direct staff to advertise for a design firm;
• Approve the Planning Commission recommendations with modifications, and direct staff to advertise for a design firm;
• Decide to not move forward with the project; or
• Provide alternative directions.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOALS:

At the 2025 Strategic Planning session, the City Council reaffirmed its 2024 directive and instructed staff to continue advancing the Safer Streets initiative as one of the City Council's Strategic Goals.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This report seeks Council approval to solicit a design contract for Safer Streets. Once the design has been completed, staff will return with project costs for separate discussion and approval. Funds to develop the design and initial construction costs totaling $7.5 million have been approved in Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program budget.

It is important to note that the City has successfully secured approximately $3.5 million in grant funds for the various segments of the project, with additional funding ($9.6 million) being sought. Those grants that have been awarded or recently applied for allow for a change in scope of the project to be completed. Grant funding may be reduced or

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025
increased depending on the final change of scope and subject to approval by the awarding agency.

Street repaving is needed on all four corridors of Safer Streets. If Safer Streets Project does not move forward, staff will seek a preliminary budget of $3 million to design and repave Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Cook Street, and Rancho Palmeras in the coming months.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. The City, acting as Lead Agency, has determined that Under California Public Resources Code section 21080.20, CEQA does not apply to active transportation plans, pedestrian plans and bicycle transportation plans.

Furthermore, the proposed improvements within the existing street rights -of -way are categorically exempt under CEQA in accordance with Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, for Existing Facilities, including streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Cook Exhibits

2. Fairway Exhibits

3. Eldorado Exhibits

4. Rancho Palmeras Exhibits

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

INDEX OF SHEETS
NO.

SHEET TITLE
1 TITLE SHEET AND VICINITY MAP
2 NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS
3 PROJECT KEY MAP
4 LAYOUT PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
5 LAYOUT PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
6 LAYOUT PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
7 LAYOUT PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
8 LAYOUT PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
9 LAYOUT PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
10 LAYOUT PLAN - COOK STREET
11 LAYOUT PLAN - COOK STREET
12 LAYOUT PLAN - COOK STREET
13 LAYOUT PLAN - RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE
14 LAYOUT PLAN - RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE
15 LAYOUT PLAN - RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE
16 LAYOUT PLAN - EL DORADO DRIVE
17 LAYOUT PLAN - EL DORADO DRIVE
18 LAYOUT PLAN - EL DORADO DRIVE
19 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
20 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
21 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - FAIRWAY DRIVE
22 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - COOK STREET
23 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - COOK STREET
24 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE
25 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE
26 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - EL DORADO DRIVE
27 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN - EL DORADO DRIVE
Underground Service Alert
ORE
Call: TOLL FREE
811 /800
227-2600

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
APPROVED:

KEN A. SEUMALO, PE NO. 56915

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE:

ATTACHMENT #2 INDIAN WELLS

SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II

COOK STREET TO EL DORADO DRIVE
FEBRUARY 2026

FOR THE

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
tI 0.

F

COOK STREET

LOCATION MAP
HANCOCK PLACE �' +
PROJECT ?lij2

LOCATION
rU

MONTECITO DRIVE

STARDUST LANE

PALMERAS DRIVE

CAMINO DE PLATA N
/ ////// /
"If r t:4
.41
s
•
I,
• ys .
4 OSAGE TRAIL • -_- -
INDIAN .\,', WfLLS
Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
0 1"

NOT TO SCALE
Wig GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
www.ghd.com
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
CONSTRUCTION contractor agrees that in accordance with generally accepted construction practices, construction contractor will be required to assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of the project, including safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall be made to apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours and construction contractor further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold design professional harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, excepting liability arising from the sole negligence of design professional. 30% DESIGN
Title TITLE SHEET AND VICINITY MAP
Size
ANSI D
Status Code
No. Issue
Checked Approved Date
Author E. BERRY
Designer E. BERRY
Drafting Check J. LOVENTHAL Project Manager S. LATINO
Design Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Director L. V. PARYS

CALI FORN IA
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.

Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
Sheet No.

G-001
Sheet
1 of 27
Plot Date: 16 February 2026 - 7:27 PM Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal Filename: C:IADSKIACCDocsIGHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files101 WIP\Gen\Sheets112674463-GHD-00-00-TTB-GN-D001.dwg

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

GENERAL NOTES

CIVIL ABBREVIATIONS

CIVIL SYMBOLS LEGEND

1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD PLANS OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION.

2. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MUTCD (ARTERIAL STREETSO AND WITH ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ALL CONSTRUCTION

AREAS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LANE CLOSURES AND DETOURS SHALL BE PROPERLY POSTED, DELINEATED AND LIGHTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CA MUTCD. CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE UTILIZED TO AUGMENT THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS AND CA MUTCD REQUIREMENTS.

3. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT FOR THE NECESSARY PERMITS AND TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLIANCE FOR ALL CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS DURING THE LIFE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND/OR PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AND ACQUIRE ALL PERMISSIONS AND PERMITS FROM THE ADJOINING PRIVATE LAND

OWNER, OTHER MUNICIPALITY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) OR

OTHER AGENCY FOR ALL WORK PERFORMED WITHIN OTHER OWNERSHIPS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR JURISDICTIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS OR OTHER AGENCIES.

5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING MULTIPLE LANE OR COMPLETE CLOSURES AT LEAST 3 WEEKS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING(S) WITH CITY STAFF AT (760) 346-2489 OR (760) 779-0237 72 HRS PRIOR TO JOB COMMENCEMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY ACTIVITY REQUIRING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO GRUBBING, GRADING. BASE AND ASPHALT PLACEMENT, TRENCHING AND BACKFILL, UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND EACH INSTRUCTION PHASE AT (760) 776-0237.

6. PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 4216, IF THE WORK IS IN AN AREA WHICH IS KNOWN, OR REASONABLY SHOULD BE KNOWN, TO CONTAIN SUBSURFACE INSTALLATIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U. S. A.) AT 800-422-4133 AND OBTAIN AN INQUIRY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS (48 HOURS) PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK THAT PENETRATES THE EXISTING SURFACE.

7. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY

RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE WHICH MIGHT RESULT BY FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES.

8. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS. PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE EXCAVATION OF A TRENCH 5 FEET IN DEPTH OR GREATER AND INTO WHICH A PERSON WILL BE REQUIRED

TO DESCEND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIRST OBTAIN A PERMIT TO DO SO FROM THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PURSUANT TO 7-10.4. 1.

9. ENGINEERED FILLS AND PADS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION PER ASTM SPECIFICATION D1557 AND THE RELATED SOILS REPORT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. ALL ROADWAY AND PARKING LOT GRADES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION PER ASTM SPECIFICATION D1557 AT THE UPPER 1 FT OF FINISHED SUBGRADE. ALL ROADWAY AND PARKING LOT GRADES ON ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION PER ASTM SPECIFICATION D1557 AT THE UPPER 3 FT OF FINISHED SUBGRADE.

LOCATIONS OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER OR CITY ENGINEER AND SHALL BE SUFFICIENT IN BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PLACEMENT TO PROVIDE REPRESENTATIVE TESTING OF ALL PLACED FILL.

TESTING IN AREAS OF A CRITICAL NATURE SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO THE NORMAL REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLINGS. THE FINAL

COMPACTION REPORT AND APPROVAL FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL CONTAIN THE TYPE OF FIELD TESTING PERFORMED. EACH TEST SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH THE METHOD OF DETERMINING THE IN -PLACE DENSITY, SAND CONE OR DRIVE RING.

10. ALL UNDERGROUND SEWER, WATER, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING SERVICE LATERALS, SHALL BE IN PLACE AND INSPECTED WITH TRENCHES COMPACTED AND TESTED PRIOR TO BASE GRADE INSPECTION AND PAVING. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CITY WRITTEN EVIDENCE ISSUED BY THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY PURVEYOR INDICATING THE SUBSURFACE PORTION OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND ACCEPTED. THE STORM DRAIN

AND UTILITY LINE BACKFILL REPORT FROM THE PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER SHALL INCLUDE AN APPROVAL STATEMENT THAT

THE SUBGRADE IS OF ADEQUATE STRENGTH TO SUPPORT THE STRUCTURES AND ANTICIPATED LOADS AND THAT THE BACKFILL AND COMPACTION IS ADEQUATE FOR THE INTENDED USE.

11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, AND/OR RELOCATION OF ALL REGULATORY, WARNING AND GUIDE SIGNS.

12. THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL APPROVE ALL STREET NAME SIGNS, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS, TRAFFIC STRIPING, LEGENDS, AND PAVEMENT MARKERS (TYPE AND LOCATION).

13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS OR BENCH MARKS NOTED ON THE PLANS, OR FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE DONE ONLY BY A CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER WITH AN R. C. E. NUMBER BELOW 33966. OR A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ALL

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENTS AND ACCESSORY TIES ARE TO BE LOCATED OR SET IN THE FIELD AND PRECONSTRUCTION CORNER RECORDS SHALL BE FILED. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL DAMAGED

OR DESTROYED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND ACCESSORY TIES ARE TO BE RESET AND POST CONSTRUCTION CORNER RECORDS FILED WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BOARD RULE 464. MONUMENTS NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO FILING WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR. ALL RESTORATION OF SURVEY MONUMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8771 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE.

14. ALL TRAVELED WAYS MUST BE CLEANED DAILY OF ALL DIRT, MUD, AND DEBRIS AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. CLEANING IS TO BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

15. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS DISTURBING MORE THAN ONE (1) ACRE MUST OBTAIN A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT. OWNERS/DEVELOPERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) WITH THE

STATE WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (SWQCB), AND TO PREPARE A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP), AND HAVE A MONITORING PLAN FOR THE SITE.

16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD WHITEWATER RIVER WATERSHED, GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND MS4 PERMITS. CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT WHITEWATER RIVER REGION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP). EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED.

SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE CONTAINED. CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION THAT WASTES ARE MANAGED AND CONTAINED AND SUCH THAT RAINFALL OR WIND DOES NOT CARRY WASTES OR POLLUTANTS OFFSITE.

CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MANAGED TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE TIME OF DISTURBED SOIL AREAS.

17. NEW IMPROVEMENTS SHALL JOIN OR MATCH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS IN A MANNER SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ENGINEER

TO ACHIEVE A SAFE, DURABLE, AESTHETICALLY PLEASING TRANSITION BETWEEN THE NEW AND EXISTING IMPROVEMENT,

INCLUDING MANHOLE AND VAULT HEIGHT ADJUSTMENTS, SAW CUTTING, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, CAPPING AND/OR COLD PLANING, AS NEEDED. ALL MANHOLES AND VALVE BOX FRAMES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINAL GRADES AFTER PAVING IS COMPLETED.

18. ALL PLANS NOT SPECIFIED AS CITY SPONSORED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) PLANS ARE VALID FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL. THE SPONSORS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS

SHOWN ON NON CIP PLANS SHALL BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH UPDATING THE PLANS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED

TO, DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT COSTS, TO AFFECT PROPER TRANSITIONS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS,

COMPLIANCE WITH ANY NEW CITY STANDARDS, ORDINANCES, OR LAWS AND REGULATIONS, ENACTED OR ADOPTED BY THE CITY OR OTHER JURISDICTIONS SUBSEQUENT TO THE PLAN APPROVAL DATE.

19. CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL FOLLOW CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND

REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK AS NEEDED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE IT IS CRACKED, UNEVEN AT JOINTS OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED, PURSUANT TO STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 5610. THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO ALL CONCRETE COMPONENTS LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

20. ALL CURBS SHALL BE ETCHED OR STAMPED SHOWING UTILITY SERVICE LATERAL LOCATIONS AS FOLLOWS:
"S" FOR SEWER
"G" FOR GAS
"E" FOR ELECTRICAL POWER

21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT AND RECEIVE CITY APPROVAL OF A FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN WHEN THE DISTURBED AREA EXCEEDS 5,000 SQUARE FEET. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL CASH OR BOND SECURITY,

AS REQUIRED, AND IMPLEMENT THE REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES BY THE FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT.

INDIAN , WfLLS
0 AB
ABDN
AC
AD
ADA
AP
ARV
ASPH
BC
BEG
BFP
BLDC
BLDG
BMP
BNDY
BOL
BSW
BVCE
BVCS
BW
C
CB
C&G
CG&S/W
CIP
CL
COMMS
CMP
CO
CONC
CONST
CONF
CONT
CSP
CU
CY
D=
DDCA
DEMO
DET
DG
DI
DIA
DIP
DWG
E
EC
EG

EL, ELEV
ELEC
EM
EP
EV
EVA
EVCE
EVCS
EX

EXIST, (E)
(F)
F/C,FC
FD
FG
FH
FL
FOUND
FS
FT
G
GB
GM
GRD, G
GV
HCR
HMA
HT
HP
HW
INST
INV
IRR
JP
JT
L
L=
LF
LIP
LP
LS
LSA

DIAMETER

AGGREGATE BASE

ABANDONED

ACRE OR ASPHALT CONCRETE

AREA DRAIN

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT

ANGLE POINT

AIR RELEASE VALVE

ASPHALT

BEGIN CURVE
BEGIN

BACK FLOW PREVENTER

BUILDING CORNER

BUILDING

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

BOUNDARY

BOLLARD

BACK OF SIDEWALK

BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION

BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE STATION

FINISHED GRADE AT BOTTOM OF WALL

CONCRETE OR CIVIL

CATCH BASIN

CURB AND GUTTER

CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK

CAST IRON PIPE

CENTERLINE

COMMUNICATION

CORRUGATED METAL PIPE

CLEAN OUT

CONCRETE

CONSTRUCTION OR CONSTRUCT

CONFORM TO EXISTING

CONTINUATION

CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN
CUBIC

CUBIC YARD

DELTA (CURVE)

DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY

DEMOLISH
DETAIL

DECOMPOSED GRANITE

DROP INLET

DIAMETER

DUCTILE IRON PIPE

DRAWING

EASTING COORDINATE, ELECTRIC

END CURVE

EXISTING GRADE

ELEVATION

ELECTRICAL

ELECTRIC METER

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

ELECTRIC VAULT

EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS

END VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION

END VERTICAL CURVE STATION

EXISTING

EXISTING
FUTURE

FACE OF CURB
FOUND

FINISH GRADE

FIRE HYDRANT

FLOW LINE

FOUNDATION

FINISHED SURFACE

FOOT, FEET

GAS, GROUND ELEVATION

GRADE BREAK

GAS METER
GROUND

GATE VALVE

HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMP

HOT MIX ASPHALT
HEIGHT

HIGH POINT

HEADWALL

INSTALL
INVERT

IRRIGATION

JOINT POLE

JOINT TRENCH
LEFT

LENGTH (CURVE)

LINEAR FEET

LIP OF GUTTER

LIGHT POLE, LOW POINT

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
MAX
MCWD
MH
MIN
MPVC
MON
MTG
N
(N)
NIC
NO
NTS
O.C.

OG
O.R.
(P)
P
PA
PAE
PB
PCC
PED
PERF
PH
PID
PL
POC
PI
PP
PRC
PT
PUE
PVC
PVI
R
R=
RC
RCP
RP
RRFB

R/W, ROW
RW
RWV
S
SC
SD
SDCB
SDDI
SDMH
SDCO
S.E.D.

SF
SG
SHLDR
SHT
SL
S.L.D.

SS
S.S.D.

SSCO
SSMH
STA
STD
S/W
T
TC
TCE
TEL
TEMP
THK
TOE
TW,TOW
TS
TYP
UKN
UNO
U/G
VC
VAR
W
WM
WV
WWF
WI
YDS

MAXIMUM

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT

MANHOLE

MINIMUM

MIDPOINT OF VERTICAL CURVE

MONUMENT

MOUNTING

NORTHING COORDINATE
NEW

NOT IN CONTRACT
NUMBER

NOT TO SCALE

ON CENTER

ORIGINAL GROUND

OFFICIAL RECORDS

PROPOSED

PAVEMENT ELEVATION

PLANTER AREA

PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT

PULL BOX

POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

PEDESTRIAN

PERFORATED

POTHOLE

POINT ID

PROPERTY LINE

POINT ON CURVE

POINT OF INTERSECTION

POWER POLE

POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE

POINT OF TANGENCY

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE

POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION
RIGHT

RADIUS (CURVE)

RELATIVE COMPACTION

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RADIUS POINT

RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON

RIGHT OF WAY

RECYCLED WATER

RECYCLE WATER VALVE

SOUTH, SLOPE
SAWCUT

STORM DRAIN

STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN

STORM DRAIN DROP INLET

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT

SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS

SILT FENCE

SUBGRADE

SHOULDER
SHEET

STREETLIGHT

SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS

SANITARY SEWER

SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS

SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STATION

STANDARD

SIDEWALK

TELEPHONE

TOP OF CURB

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION

EASEMENT

TELEPHONE

TEMPORARY
THICK

TOE OF SLOPE

TOP OF WALL

TOP OF SLAB

TYPICAL

UNKNOWN

UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE

UNDERGROUND

VERTICAL CURVE
VARIES

WEST, WATER

WATER METER

WATER VALVE

WELDED WIRE FABRIC
WITH
YARDS
Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
0 1"

EXISTING
0 f
E
CD
i
TS
•
SL
0 O
WM
ICV
IC
+O+
O
(T
TV
x
V

HORIZONTAL / VERTICAL CONTROL

LIGHT POLE
POST

FLAG POLE

MAILBOX

POWER POLE ANCHOR

POWER POLE

ELECTRICAL BOX

ELECTRIC MANHOLE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL

TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULLBOX

STREET LIGHTS

STREET LIGHT PULLBOX

LARGE SIGN

SMALL SIGN

CALLBOX

CATCH BASIN

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

MISC VALVE COVER

WATER VALVE

WATER METER

IRRIGATION VALVE

FIRE HYDRANT

SEWER MANHOLE

UTILITY BOX

TELEPHONE MANHOLE

TELEPHONE BOX

TRANSMISSION TOWER

CABLE TV PEDESTAL

RAIL ROAD SIGNAL
VENT
PALM
TREE

TREE LINE

BRUSH LINE
30% DESIGN
Wig GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
www.ghd.com
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
Title NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS
No. Issue
Checked Approved Date
Author E. BERRY Drafting Check J. LOVENTHAL Project Manager S. LATINO Designer E. BERRY Design Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Director L. V. PARYS

CALIFORNIA
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.

Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
Plot Date: 16 February 2026 - 7:27 PM
Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal Filename: C:IADSKIACCDocsIGHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files101 WIP\Gen\Sheets112674463-GHD-00-00-TTB-GN-D001.dwg

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
O
U
+
LO
M
co
_LO
+
N
CO (
O
U o
ti

COVE GATE RD
O
V5 O
V
O
ch
CO
C -1o1
SS -101
5 oo
1 C-102
20+00
HIGHWAY 111
C-102
J
J_
N
25+00 _
C-103

STARDUST LN
N
N
O
M
J

PAINTED DESERT DR
30+00
N

VALLEY RD
W
N
0 W
L
Q
CL
C-103
LU
J
coQ
o O
�r
v J
o
LO
35+00 _
+
CO
O
cis
C-104
J 40+00
C-104
45+00
-50+00-)}
C-105-
55+00
CAMINO CIELO =

OSAGE TRAIL
0 +
N
CO
cn

EL DORADO DR

ALTAMIRA DR
C-106
60+00
0 LO
SS -101
INDIAN , W[LLS
0 Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
1"
SS -102

FAIRWAY DR
�.d
SS -102
PM"! GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
www.ghd.com
SS -103
0 200'
400'
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
O
+
+
SS -103
CO
O
cn
Title PROJECT KEY MAP
+00
C 66+50
30% DESIGN
Size
ANSI D
Status Code
No Issue
Checked Approved
Date
Author E. BERRY
Designer E. BERRY
Drafting Check J. LOVENTHAL Project Manager S. LATINO
Design Check J. LOVENTHAL Project Director L. V. PARYS

CALI FORNIA
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.

Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
Plot Date: 16 February 2026 - 7:27 PM
Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal
Filename: C:\ADSK\ACCDocs\GHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files\01 WIP\Gen\Sheets\12674463-GHD-00-00-TTB-GN-D002.dwg Sheet
3 of 27

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
CONT - SEE SHEET C-107
0 SHEET KEYNOTES
1 CIS
a PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
U
"COOK ST" 10+00.00

ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING

I COORDINATION IS PLANNED

FOR THE NEXT SUBMITTAL
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
O
21'
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
NM mg
PROP. R/1/1/
EX. RAN -
0 10'
0 20'
10'
N
20'
40'
40'
I
Th)
w
O SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.

O2 AC OVERLAY
• TYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200.

O4 CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.

O5 CURB
• UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
• DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
• CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210. • DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND
4 4
O
44 4
d
•
4 44
a
A
≥°°o°°o°°°c
oogoo

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109.40
S80°57'33"E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11+09.40
12+39.71
13+66.03
256.632
600.00
S68°42'21"E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13+66.03
15+48.11
17+19.58
353.554
600.00
S73°20'01"E
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+62.03
542.45
N89°47'08"E
C3
TP
IP
TP
22+62.03
22+88.46
23+14.87

52.847
1300.00
N88°37'15"E
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+28.26
113.39
N87°27'23"E
C4
TP
IP
TP
24+28.26
24+54.39
24+80.51

52.251
1300.00
N88°36'28"E
L4
BP
EP
24+80.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89°45'33"E
C5
TP
IP
TP
61+62.92
62+56.56
63+45.92
183.000
350.00
N74°46'50"E
L5
BP
EP
63+45.92
64+22.92

77.00 N59°48'06"E
C6
TP
IP
TP
64+22.92
64+71.50
65+19.24

96.320
300.00
N68°59'58"E
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24
66+49.75
130.52
N78°11'51"E
30% DESIGN
INDIAN \l% WLLS
Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
0 1"
Wig GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
www.ghd.com
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
Title LAYOUT PLAN

FAIRWAY DRIVE
Size
ANSI D
Status Code
No. Issue
Checked Approved Date
Author J. LOVENTHAL
Designer J. LOVENTHAL
Drafting Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Manager S. LATINO
Design Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Director L. V. PARYS

CALIFORNIA
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.

Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
Plot Date: 8 April 2026 - 12:11 AM
Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal Filename: C:IADSKIACCDocs1GHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files101 WIP\Civil\Sheets112674463-GHD-00-00-PAP-CI-D101.dwg Sheet
4 of 27

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
0 SHEET KEYNOTES
I
I
1 U
W
LLI
U)I
zloo
i
i
o
zloo
J
U
"FAIRWAY DR" LINE
L
W
12'
0 o
C3
-t
VAR
23+00 10'
1/ _
24+00
-t
I =
g
"FAIRWAY DR" LINE
u
EX. R/W
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
g
g
o
i
L2 _ 221
I =
W

FAIRWAY DRIVE
PROP. R/W
26+00
IM
0 0
10'
MI MI
20'
40'
- EX. R/W
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
10'
20'
PROP. R/W
40'
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
i
I
I
I
Cr)
O
LLJ
z_
J
U
OSIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.

O2 AC OVERLAY
TYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200. 4O CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.

O5 CURB

UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
O7 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210.

DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET

CURB INLET
LEGEND
4 A
da
A
t.

A
44 A
L
io°000"oo"c
00 MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109.40
S80°57'33"E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11+09.40
12+39.71
13+66.03
256.632
600.00
S68°42'21"E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13+66.03
15+48.11
17+19.58
353.554
600.00
S73°20'01"E
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+62.03
542.45
N89°47'08"E
C3
TP
IP
TP
22+62.03
22+88.46
23+14.87

52.847
1300.00
N88°37'15"E
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+28.26
113.39
N87°27'23"E
C4
TP
IP
TP
24+28.26
24+54.39
24+80.51

52.251
1300.00
N88°36'28"E
L4
BP
EP
24+80.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89°45'33"E
C5
TP
IP
TP
61+62.92
62+56.56
63+45.92
183.000
350.00
N74°46'50"E
L5
BP
EP
63+45.92
64+22.92

77.00 N59°48'06"E
C6
TP
IP
TP
64+22.92
64+71.50
65+19.24

96.320
300.00
N68°59'58"E
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24
66+49.75
130.52
N78°11'51"E
30% DESIGN
No Issue
Checked Approved
Date
INDIAN\'W[LLS
Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
0 1"
Pling GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
www.ghd.com
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.

Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
Title LAYOUT PLAN

FAIRWAY DRIVE
Size
ANSI D
Status Code
Author J. LOVENTHAL
Designer J. LOVENTHAL
Drafting Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Manager S. LATINO
Design Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Director L. V. PARYS

CALI FORNIA
Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
Plot Date: 16 February 2026 - 9:09 PM
Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal
Filename: C:\ADSK\ACCDocs\GHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files101 WIP\Civil\Sheets\12674463-GHD-00-00-PAP-CI-D101.dwg

Sheet

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026

O SHEET KEYNOTES
I
r
.mil)
%s.■_.�` . �/:

EX. R/W

—
� � i"
W
W
■ W W W
�
W
W
0 12
ti
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
Q
8 -00 - -- 28+00 "FAIRWAY DR" LINE 29+00
30+00 10 31+00 32-

FAIRWAY
DRIVE
10'
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
©
Iti 5;z`
8 - EX. R/W
ii PROP. RIW
I= I= I= =I _,7Z

= m
� we ini mi i m i im mi
w
CO
w
w
C!)
LLJ
Z
J
U
i
I
IC
00 "FAIRWAY DR" LINE
No Issue
Checked Approved
Date
Author J. LOVENTHAL
Designer J. LOVENTHAL
Drafting Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Manager S. LATINO
Design Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Director L. V. PARYS
►� EX. RIW
--4A#
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
a
RELOCATE EX. TRASH CAN
IC

FAIRWAY DRIVE
INDIAN\'W[LLS

CALIFORNIA
Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
0 1"
I @V
0 10'
I
I
20'
40'
i
ICV
Pling GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
0 10'
20'
W
12'
8'
8'
10'
40'
www.ghd.com
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose. crs
o z
—v J
w
w
C!)
w
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
OSIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.

O2 AC OVERLAY
TYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200.

OCURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.

O5 CURB
• UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
O7 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
Og CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210.

O DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND
4 44
d
A
44 d
L
°o°°"°°°c
0 00000°0000

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109.40
S80°57'33"E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11+09.40
12+39.71
13+66.03
256.632
600.00
S68°42'21"E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13+66.03
15+48.11
17+19.58
353.554
600.00
S73°20'01"E
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+62.03
542.45
N89°47'08"E
C3
TP
IP
TP
22+62.03
22+88.46
23+14.87

52.847
1300.00
N88°37'15"E
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+28.26
113.39
N87°27'23"E
C4
TP
IP
TP
24+28.26
24+54.39
24+80.51

52.251
1300.00
N88°36'28"E
L4
BP
EP
24+80.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89°45'33"E
C5
TP
IP
TP
61+62.92
62+56.56
63+45.92
183.000
350.00
N74°46'50"E
L5
BP
EP
63+45.92
64+22.92

77.00 N59°48'06"E
C6
TP
IP
TP
64+22.92
64+71.50
65+19.24

96.320
300.00
N68°59'58"E
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24
66+49.75
130.52
N78°11'51"E
Title LAYOUT PLAN

FAIRWAY DRIVE
30% DESIGN
Size
ANSI D
Status Code
Sheet
Plot Date: 16 February 2026 - 9:09 PM
Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal
Filename: C:\ADSK\ACCDocs\GHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files101 WIP\Civil\Sheets\12674463-GHD-00-00-PAP-CI-D101.dwg

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
0 SHEET KEYNOTES
Cr)
O
U �
WLLJ
CI) 1
LLJ
Z
J
LLJ
0 CO
W
Cr)
LLI
J
U
I �I�
tY
W
-J W
Q
CL E
0 0
O
CONT - SEE SHEET C-110
oho
"RANCHO PALMERAS [
S
SEE C-110 FOR RANCHO

PALMERAS DRIVE

LAYOUT PLAN
37+00
O
"FAIRWAY DR" 37+02.73 =
"RANCHO PALMERAS DR" 10+00.00
L,
12'

FAIRWAY DRIVE
10'

MANZO ROAD
"FAIRWAY DR" LINE
40+00
g
D
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
41+00
L
ICV
0 10'
20'
40'
C
EBIN
i
i
i
-.,--
EX.

RNV
12'
g
g
go
g—
❑ g
g
g
o g
❑ g g
8 R\
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
$ T: _
ilitk
,._ .
- ---"ft. � y, >'
42+00 o
M
v
X10
43+00
L4 �
44+00 a FAIRWAY DR LINE
45+00 46+00

_

FAIRWAY
DRIVE

10' ©1M
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
-
•
liw
�-
I
ACV \
-
L, -
-- -- --
- - �� EX. R/W `�
1 ,
,,,,---v-,
-
1 �. r
_____Ni, - - - E - - C- - - - - PROP. R/W = = = =_
AAA
INDIAN , W[LLS
Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
0 1"
PIM! GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
www.ghd.com
0 i
10'
20'
40'
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
OSIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.
02 AC OVERLAY
TYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200. 40 CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208. 05 CURB

UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED

DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
Og CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210.

DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET

CURB INLET
LEGEND
4 da
d
d
t.
d
44 d
L
OO OC
00000°000°

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109.40
S80°57'33"E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11+09.40
12+39.71
13+66.03
256.632
600.00
S68°42'21"E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13+66.03
15+48.11
17+19.58
353.554
600.00
S73°20'01"E
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+62.03
542.45
N89°47'08"E
C3
TP
IP
TP
22+62.03
22+88.46
23+14.87

52.847
1300.00
N88°37'15"E
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+28.26
113.39
N87°27'23"E
C4
TP
IP
TP
24+28.26
24+54.39
24+80.51

52.251
1300.00
N88°36'28"E
L4
BP
EP
24+80.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89°45'33"E
C5
TP
IP
TP
61+62.92
62+56.56
63+45.92
183.000
350.00
N74°46'50"E
L5
BP
EP
63+45.92
64+22.92

77.00 N59°48'06"E
C6
TP
IP
TP
64+22.92
64+71.50
65+19.24

96.320
300.00
N68°59'58"E
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24
66+49.75
130.52
N78°11'51"E
Title LAYOUT PLAN

FAIRWAY DRIVE
30% DESIGN
Size
ANSI D
Status Code
No Issue
Checked Approved
Date
Author J. LOVENTHAL
Designer J. LOVENTHAL
Drafting Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Manager S. LATINO
Design Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Director L. V. PARYS

CALI FORNIA
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.

Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
Plot Date: 16 February 2026 - 9:09 PM
Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal
Filename: C:\ADSK\ACCDocs\GHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files101 WIP\Civil\Sheets\12674463-GHD-00-00-PAP-CI-D101.dwg

Sheet

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
0 SHEET KEYNOTES
CD
U
w
C!)
z_
J
O
w
0 CO
w
w
C/)
z_
J
U
I-
Q
I
I
I
I
I
I

DRIVEWAY PER COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE STD. NO. 207A.

W=24'.

PORTION OF EX. WALL TO BE
DEMOLISHED.

EX. CURB EDGE TO BE REALIGNED.

ADDITIONAL TOPO SURVEY
NEEDED AT NEXT PHASE.

EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
IC

FAIRWAY DRIVE

FAIRWAY DRIVE
PROP. RM/
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
"FAIRWAY DR" LINE
"FAIRWAY DR" LINE
w
12'
O
W
O
0 0
10'
20'
40'
0 10'
20'
40'
EBN
i
I
0 w
CO
w
C!)
w
z
U
CO
LLI
w
w
Cf)
z
U
H
• SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.

O2 AC OVERLAY
• TYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200.

O4 CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.

O5 CURB
• UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
O7 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
O8 CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210. • DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND
4 e
a
a
A
•
a
44 a
A
i°"o°°O"°°"c

OO OOOO
0000°°oo°°

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109.40
S80°57'33"E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11+09.40
12+39.71
13+66.03
256.632
600.00
S68°42'21"E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13+66.03
15+48.11
17+19.58
353.554
600.00
S73°20'01"E
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+62.03
542.45
N89°47'08"E
C3
TP
IP
TP
22+62.03
22+88.46
23+14.87

52.847
1300.00
N88°37'15"E
L3
BP
EP
23+14.87
24+28.26
113.39
N87°27'23"E
C4
TP
IP
TP
24+28.26
24+54.39
24+80.51

52.251
1300.00
N88°36'28"E
L4
BP
EP
24+80.51
61+62.92
3682.41
N89°45'33"E
C5
TP
IP
TP
61+62.92
62+56.56
63+45.92
183.000
350.00
N74°46'50"E
L5
BP
EP
63+45.92
64+22.92

77.00 N59°48'06"E
C6
TP
IP
TP
64+22.92
64+71.50
65+19.24

96.320
300.00
N68°59'58"E
L6
BP
EP
65+19.24
66+49.75
130.52
N78°11'51"E
30% DESIGN
INDIAN \1% WLLS
Bar is one inch on
original size sheet
0 1"
PIN GHD Inc.
320 Goddard Suite 200
Irvine California 92618 USA
T 1 949 648 5200
www.ghd.com
Client CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Project SAFER STREETS PHASE I & II
Title LAYOUT PLAN

FAIRWAY DRIVE
Size
ANSI D
Status Code
No. Issue
Checked Approved
Date
Author J. LOVENTHAL
Designer J. LOVENTHAL
Drafting Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Manager S. LATINO
Design Check B. ZAMBRANO Project Director L. V. PARYS

CALIFORNIA
Conditions of Use
This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD's client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose.

Project No.
12674463
Date
2026-02-17
Scale

AS NOTED
Plot Date: 7 April 2026 - 11:47 PM
Plotted By: Jenna Loventhal
Filename: C:IADSKIACCDocs1GHD Services Pty Ltd112674463-Indian Wells Safer Streets\Project Files101 WIP\Civil\Sheets112674463-GHD-00-00-PAP-CI-D101.dwg

Sheet
8 of 27

Council Meeting Agenda- April 16, 2026
0 SHEET KEYNOTES
LC )
CD
O
w
C!)
z
U
.4g

VISTA DORADO DRIVE
EX. R/W
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
EX. R/W

PROP R/W

FAIRWAY DRIVE
0�
SEE C-113 FOR
• ELDORADO DRIVE •

LAYOUT PLAN
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
"FAIRWAY DR" 63+72.19 =
"EL DORADO DR" 10+00.00
PROP. CROSSWALK PAVERS
O
f
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
fo
EX. CURB AND GUTTER
W
fo
fo
0 10'
0 _g
L6
20'
fo
10'
40'
66+00 --
fn_
20'
CONT - SEE SHEET C-113
/
40'
fo
O
fo
I
0 w
m
w
C!)
w
z
U
66+50
SIDEWALK PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 205.

O2 AC OVERLAY
• TYPE A-6 CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 200.

O4 CURB RAMP PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 208.

O5 CURB
• UTILITY TO BE RELOCATED
O7 DECORATIVE PAVERS, REPLACE IN KIND UNO
O8 CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 210. • DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF INDIAN WELLS STD. PLAN NO. 209.
10 CURB OUTLET
11 CURB INLET
LEGEND
4 e
a
d.
a
A
•
a
44 a
A
i°"o°°OO OO"°°"C
0000 OOO
°°oo°°

MINOR CONCRETE

VEHICULAR CONCRETE

AC OVERLAY

DECORATIVE PAVERS

COLORED PERMEABLE CONCRETE

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
LINE "FAIRWAY DR" LINE AND CURVE TABLE
TAG

CHAINAGE
LENGTH
RADIUS

BEARING
L1
BP
EP
10+00.00
11+09.40
109.40
S80°57'33"E
C1
TP
IP
TP
11+09.40
12+39.71
13+66.03
256.632
600.00
S68°42'21"E
C2
TP
IP
TP
13+66.03
15+48.11
17+19.58
353.554
600.00
S73°20'01"E
L2
BP
EP
17+19.58
22+62.03
542.45
N89°47'08"E
C3
TP
IP
TP
22+62.03
22+88.46
23+14.87