Agenda, first session — Indio City Council, June 7, 2023 (part 3 of 4)

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 220 of 486 26 property. At present, there are cross -circulation easement agreements between the subject property and the properties immediately west and east of this property. As such, the project complies with Section 3.14.B.1.g.vi.

75. Section 3.14.C.1- 3 specifies standards that are applicable to all limited land uses comprised of:

1. Intent and Applicability. The intent of these standards is to ensure that:
a. New freestanding commercial buildings shall contribute to the overall pedestrian experience and quality of life within the Corridor, while minimizing any negative impacts to the mixed-use urban character envisioned for the Corridor. b. New buildings that provide drive- through facilities operate efficiently while minimizing the negative impacts on traffic, pedestrian safety, and street character. No part of a drive-through facility may interfere with clear and safe pedestrian access to the building’s main entrance, nor detract from the building’s frontage character facing the Corridor.

2. Freestanding Commercial Building Standards
a. Frontage
i. Active uses (retail, dining, bar, etc.) shall be located along the street-facing façade, with fenestration as required in Section 3.10.B and 3.10.C to render business activity clearly visible from the street.
ii. Active outdoor spaces (dining, gathering, etc.) are encouraged, and when provided shall be located so as to be clearly visible from 111 and/or other streets. iii. Outdoor dining areas shall be defined by low fences and/or low landscaping.

Where adjacent to the drive-through stacking aisle, a landscape buffer of at least six (6) feet in width shall be provided. See S ection 3.13 (Site Standards) for additional requirements.
iv. Encroachments. Sun- shading devices (awnings, canopies, porches, pergolas, umbrellas, trees, etc.) shall be provided over any active outdoor spaces to provide a more comfortable, user-friendly environment. See requirements in Section 3.10.D (Projecting Architectural Elements), and Section 3.13 (Site Standards).

3. Drive-Through Facilities Standards
a. Permit requirements. Drive-through facilities - as defined in the UDC - shall require a Conditional Use Permit and are permitted only within the Mixed-Use Corridor Zone. b. Access
i. To the greatest extent possible, driveways providing access to or egress from a drive-through service lane shall also provide access to the customer parking lot. ii. Drive-through lanes adjacent to the building shall be screened from the Highway 111 Corridor and all sidewalks by the building mass, low walls (3’-4’ tall), pergolas, and/or landscaping. See Figures 3.14- 2 for preferable configurations. Drive-through lanes elsewhere on the site shall be screened from the street in the manner required for parking lots.
iii. Locating the drive-through lane between a building and the Highway 111 Corridor sidewalk is strongly discouraged. However, if there is no other alternative, a clearly marked pedestrian walkway shall provide clear access from the sidewalk, across the drive-through lane, to the building entrance (see Figure 3.14- 3). The pedestrian

Page 48 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 221 of 486 27 walkway shall be designed as a crosswalk, including signage and cues such as striping or material changes.
c. Frontage
i. If a drive-through lane is located between the building and the Corridor sidewalk, the drive-through shall be integrated into the building design via a “faux” façade or screen wall built between the drive-through lane and the sidewalk that shall either be built to look like an extension of the primary building and made of the same material, or be built as an arcade or pergola addition to the primary building. The façade or screen wall must present a generally open, fenestrated appearance meeting the intent of Façade requirements in Section 3.10.B while also substantially screening views of idling vehicles, by spanning the entire length of the primary façade(s) facing the sidewalk (see Figure 3.14-3).
d. Parking
i. Drive-through lanes shall be physically separated from the parking lot by low walls (3’ to 4’ tall), pergolas, and/or landscaping (See Figures 3.14-2 and 3.14-3). ii. If a drive-through lane is located between the building and the parking lot, a clearly marked pedestrian crossing across the travel lane shall connect the parking lot to the building entrance.

76. Regarding Section 3.14.C.1.a, the project is a new freestanding commercial building comprised of a fast -food or quick service restaurant with an attendant drive- through component. The project as originally designed does not fully contribute to the overall pedestrian experience and quality of life within the Corridor, however, because of the subject parcel’s irregular shape and the need to maintain cross circulation drives adjacent to Highway 111 with the existing properties to the east and west, the project is reasonably limited in comprehensively addressing Section 3.14.C.1.a.

77. Regarding Section 3.14.C.1.b, the on- site building is located on a north- south orientation. The northern elevation of the building is comprised of composite architectural materials, windows and an entrance door. There is a pedestrian connection proposed from the existing sidewalk on Highway 111 through the site intersecting the on- site portion of the cross -circulation driv e and the drive- through aisle. Following the conclusion of the Planning Commission’s review of the project, the applicant submitted an updated site plan a raised pedestrian crossing comprised of stamped concrete measuring six (6) feet wide and ½ foot high demonstrating compliance to Section 3.14.C.1.b.

78. Regarding Section 3.14.C.2.a.i, the project is a fast-food restaurant with drive-through component with the main on-site building located approximately 50 feet from Highway 111 due to the subject property’s irregular shape and the need to maintain existing cross-circulation drive areas with the properties to the immediate east and west. The project has been evaluated for conformity to Sections 3.10.B and 3.10.C and has been found to be in conformity or can be found in conformity with the application of conditions of approval. Regarding Section 3.14.C.2.a.ii, the applicant is not proposing any active outdoor spaces, which are only encouraged and are not prescriptively required and as such, this Section is not applicable to the project.

Page 49 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 222 of 486 28 79. Regarding Section 3.14.C.2.a.iii, the applicant is not proposing any active outdoor spaces, which are only encouraged and are not prescriptively required and as such, this Section is not applicable to the project.

80. Regarding Section 3.14.C.2.a.iv, the applicant is not proposing any active outdoor spaces, which are only encouraged and are not prescriptively required and as such, this Section is not applicable to the project.

81. Regarding Section 3.14.C.3.a, the project is proposed as a fast -food restaurant with attendant drive-through facility and is located on property that has been designated Mixed Use Corridor Zone by the adopted Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and as such, the project complies with this Section.

82. Regarding Section 3.14.C.3.b.i, the project site driveway provides access to both the drive-through service land and to the customer parking lot and as such, the project complies with this Section.

83. Regarding Section 3.14.C.3.b.ii, the on- site drive-through lane originates in the rear of the site, runs parallel to the property ’s eastern property line and curves in front of the building fronting along Highway 111. The submitted site plan specifies a screen wall/trellis along the eastern property line and a small section of screen wall in the “curve” of the drive- through lane as it transitions to in front of the building. The submitted color elevation drawings show an elevation for the proposed screen/wall trellis, but do not specify dimensions. The submitted landscaping shows a limited amount of shrubs and groundcovers situated i mmediately north of the drive- through lane as it curves in front of the building . The applicant shall submit construction documents and a final landscape plan prior to the issuance of a building permit demonstrating compliance to the drive-through lane scr eening requirements of Section 3.14.C.3.b.ii.

84. Regarding Section 3.14.C.3.b.iii, there is a pedestrian connection proposed from the existing sidewalk on Highway 111 through the site intersecting the on- site portion of the cross -circulation drive and the drive -through aisle. The submitted plans do not specify design details for this pedestrian connection such that a determination that designed as a crosswalk, including signage and cues such as striping or material changes Therefore, a condition of approval is warranted requiring the submittal of modified plans demonstrating that the on- site pedestrian connection from Highway 111 to the building’s main entrance has been designed and will be constructed in conformity to the specifications of Section 3.14.C.3.b.iii. Following the conclusion of the Planning Commission’s review of the project, the applicant submitted an updated site plan a raised pedestrian crossing comprised of stamped concrete measuring six (6) feet wide and ½ foot high. The applicant shall be r equired via a condition of approval to construct the raised pedestrian crossing in conformance with the approved site plan comprised of stamped concrete measuring six (6) feet wide and one half of a foot high prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Page 50 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 223 of 486 29 85. Regarding Section 3.14.C.3.c.i, the submitted plans specify a screen wall and architectural trellis element along the eastern property line, but they do not fully address conformity to this section. Specifically, the proposed screen wall and architectural trellis should extend along a portion of the eastern building elevation from the southern edge of the eastern building elevation to the southern edge of the first window set on the eastern building elevation and further that this screen wall and architectural trellis should be topped with a partially enclosed to fully enclosed cover to address architectural integration. Therefore, a condition of approval is warranted requiring prior to building permit issuance the submittal of construction documents specifying the extension of the screen wall and architectural trellis along a portion of the eastern building elevation from the southern edge of the eastern building elevation to the southern edge of the first window set on the eastern building elevation and the toping of the screen wall and architectural trellis with a partially enclosed to fully enclosed cover to address architectural integration for conformity to Section

3.14.C.3.c.i.

86. Regarding Section 3.14.C.3.d.i, the project’s drive through lane is situated on the eastern portion/eastern building elevation of the site and the surface customer parking lot is situated on the western portion/western building elevation of the site and as such, compliance to this Section has been achieved. Regarding Secti on 3.14.C.3.d.ii, the project’s drive-through lane is not located between the building and the parking lot and as such, this Section is not applicable to the project.

Section 5. Conditional Approval. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Indio, California, finds that the Wendy’s Drive-Through Restaurant is compliant or can be made compliant to the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and that CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of the Conditional Use Permit and Planning Review Permit for the Wendy ’s Drive -Through Restaurant attached hereto as Exhibit “A” be granted subject to the conditions of approval stated herein. The Applicant shall demonstrate compliance to ALL conditions of approval, contained in the City Council’s approval, if granted. Failure to demonstrate compliance to these conditions of approval may result in the delay of the revocation of any and all land use entitlements. Where the term “Applicant” is used in any condition of approval, this term shall apply also to the Property owner, any developer, or any successor in the interest of the Applicant. It is the Applicant’s or Applicant’s successor in interest responsibility to fully comply with the City Council’s conditions of approval unless subsequently modified in accordance with the C ity’s required processes and procedures:

A. General Conditions of Approval:

The Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance to the following conditions of approval:

1. In the event of any court action or proceeding challenging the approval of this resolution or otherwise challenging the conditional approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Planning Review Permit for the Wendy’s Drive- Through Restaurant, the

Page 51 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 224 of 486 30 Applicant shall defend, at its own expense, the action or proceeding. In addition, the Applicant shall reimburse the City for the City's cost of defending any such court action or proceeding. The Applicant shall also pay any award of costs, expenses, and fees that the court having jurisdiction over such challenge makes in favor of any challenger and against the City. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City in any such defense as the City may reasonably request and may not resolve such challenge without the agreement of the City. In the event the Applicant fails or refuses to reimburse the City for its cost to defend any challenge, the City shall have the right, among other remedies, to revoke this approval. In order to ensure compliance with this condition, within twenty (20) days after notification by the City of the filing of any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Design Review, the Applicant shall deposit with the City cash or other security in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), satisfactory in form to the City Attorney, guaranteeing indemnification or reimbursement to the City of all costs related to any action triggering the obligations of this condition. If the City is required to draw on that cash or security to indemnify or reimburse itself for such costs, the Applicant shall restore the deposit to its original amount within thirty (30) calendar days after notice from the City.

Additionally, if at any time the City Attorney determines that an additi onal deposit is necessary to secure the obligations of this section, the Applicant shall provide such additional security within thirty (30) calendar days of notice from the City Attorney. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding within the scope of this condition.

2. The Applicant shall cause to be recorded against the subject site these and all related conditions of approval approved by the City Council with the Riverside County Recorder.

3. The Applicant shall within thirty (30) calendar days after City Council approval submit to the Community Development Director its written consent to all of the conditions of approval contained in the written City Council approval without amendment.

4. Mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the development to prevent flooding of the site or downstream properties. These measures shall require 100 percent on-site retention of the incremental increase of runoff from the 100- year storm. In addition, flood protection measures shall comply with California Drainage Law and provide that offsite stormwater flows are received onto the property and discharged from the property in a manner that is reasonably compatible with redevelopment conditions.

The applicant shall separately submit to the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for review of said flood protection measures for compliance with California Drainage Law from a regional valley floor drainage perspective.

5. The project site lies within the East Whitewater River Sub basin Area o f Benefit.

Groundwater production within the area of benefit is subject to a replenishment assessment in accordance with the State Water Code. Any entity producing more than 25 acre-feet of water during any year from one or more wells must equip the well(s ) with a water -measuring device. A CVWD Water Production Metering Agreement is

Page 52 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 225 of 486 31 required to provide CVWD staff with the authority to regularly read and maintain this water-measuring device.

6. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) is a law requiri ng that groundwater basins are managed to achieve sustainability. In accordance with the SGMA, CVWD submitted the Coachella Valley Water Management Plan as an alternative to a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (Alternative Plan) for the Indio Subbasin. On July 17, 2019, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) sent a notification approving the Alternative Plan. The goal of the Alternative Plan is to reliably meet current and future water demands in a cost -effective and sustainable manner. This development lies within the Indio Subbasin and will contribute to the total water demand in the subbasin. The elements and actions described in the Alternative Plan shall be incorporated into the design, construction, and operation of this development to reduce its negative impact on the Indio Subbasin.

7. Imperial Irrigation District (IID) will not begin any studies, engineering or estimate costs to provide electrical service to the project until the applicant submits a customer project application (available at http://www. iid.com/home/showdocument?id=12923 and detailed loading information, panel sizes, project schedule and estimated in- service date. Applicant shall bear all costs associated with providing electrical service to the project, including but not limited to the c onstruction of distribution feeder backbone and line extensions, underground conduit systems and upgrades or reconfigurations of existing facilities as well as applicable permits, zoning changes, landscaping (if required by the City) and rights -of-way and easements. However, based on the preliminary information provided to IID, the district can accommodate the project's power requirements by extending distribution primary lines (conduit and cable) including the reconfiguration of neighboring circuits from existing facilities to the project site.

8. IID’s ability to provide service from existing infrastructure is based upon current available capacity, which may be impacted by future development in the area. It is important to note that a detailed and final study will be developed once a customer project application and loading calculations are received. This detailed information will allow IID to perform an accurate assessment and provide a full report of any potential impacts and mitigation measures. The conditions of service could change as a result of the additional studies.

9. Underground infrastructure that includes trenching, conduits, pull boxes, switch boxes and pads should be installed at the applicant's expense following IID approved plans and within the public utility easement (PUE) or a dedicated e asement, if applicable.

Physical field installation of underground infrastructures should be verified and approved by an IID inspector prior to cable installation as per IID Developer's Guide (available for download at the district website
https://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=14229 ).

Page 53 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 226 of 486 32 10. It is important to note that IID's policy is to extend its electrical facilities only to those project that have obtained the approval of a city or county planning commission and such other governmental authority or decis ion-making body having jurisdiction over said developments.

11. The applicant will be required to provide rights -of-way and easements for power line extensions and/or any other infrastructure needed to serve the project.

12. Public utility easements over all pri vate public roads and additional ten (10) feet in width on both side of the private and public roads shall be dedicated to IID for the construction, operation, and maintenance of its electrical infrastructure.

13. Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the 11 D encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion are available at https://www.iid.com/about - iid/department-directory/real-estate. The IID Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 339- 9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements.

14. Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the project (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines, ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service; the acquisition and dedication of real property, rights of way and/or easements for the siting and construction of electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines and ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service, etc.) need to be included as part of the project 's California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Any mitigation necessary as a result of the construction, relocation and/or upgrade of IID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent.

15. The Owner/Developer’s engineer shall meet with V alley Sanitary District staff and discuss proposed sewer main connections and requirements prior to the submittal of any design engineering plans.

16. Sewer main lateral and connection to the District’s sewer main are normally considered private and owned by the Owner(s) of the property. The Owner(s) shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of this sewer main lateral.

Page 54 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 227 of 486 33 17. The proposed project will comply with all Valley Sanitary District and other agency standards and requirements.

18. Improvements in the public right of way will require bonding by the Owner/Developer and installation by a licensed underground contractor.

19. The proposed project shall be subject to all terms and conditions of the State of California mandated pre-treatment regulations.

20. The proposed project shall be subject to the local effluent requirements of Valley Sanitary District's (VSD) Resolution 2008- 998; local discharge limits, and conformance with the Valley Sanitary District Sewer Use and Construction Ordinance 2010-118.

21. For compliance to Section 3.13.E.2.ii of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan, there shall not be, at any time during the lifetime of the project, the installation of grass or turf and only desert appropriate landscaping shall be allowed.

22. The building materials, finish and composition shall at all times during the lifetime of the building demonstrate compliance to Section 3.10.4.a-e of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan.

23. Submit detailed information prepared by a qualified professional demonstrating compliance to Section 3.8.B.2.f.i-v, as applicable.

24. The project shall maintain conformity at all times with applicable portions of Section

3.14.B.1 to ensure its exemption from the frontage buildout requirements of Table 3.8-

1. 25. All wall-mounted, freestanding, menu and directional signage to be installed at the project site shall be subject to issuance of a building permit, as applicable, and shall demonstrate conformance to relevant requirements of Section 3.11 (Private Signage) of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan.

B. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit:

Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate full compliance with the following conditions of approval:

1. The project shall comply with the l atest adopted edition of the following codes as applicable:
a. California Building Code
b. California Residential Code
c. California Electrical Code
d. California Mechanical Code
e. California Plumbing Code
f. California Energy Code

Page 55 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 228 of 486 34 g. California Fire Code
h. California Green Building Standards Code

2. Automatic fire suppression systems shall be installed in all new construction per Title IX, Chapter 93 of the Code of the City of Indio. Design and type of system shall be based upon the requirements of the adopted Building Codes and Fire Codes and the requirements of the Indio Fire Department.

3. The requirements of the Air Quality Management District shall be satisfied prior to the issuance of any permit if dusts and/or pollutants will be discharged into the atmosphere.

4. Any temporary building or trailer used for construction purposes shall obtain a building permit prior to installation.

5. All perimeter/boundary walls shall be designed and c onstructed so that the outer/exterior face of the wall is as close as possible to the lot line. In any case, the outer/exterior face of the wall shall be within two (2) inches of the lot line. Distances greater than two (2) inches may be approved prior to construction by the Building Official on a case by case basis for extenuating circumstances.

6. All lot lines, easement lines, etc. shall be located and/or relocated, as needed, in such a manner as to not cause any existing structure to become non- conforming with the requirements of the latest adopted edition of the Building Code, or any other applicable law, ordinance, or code.

7. All signs shall be Underwriters Laboratories approved, or equal.

8. Permits are required prior to the removal and/or demolition of structures , as applicable.

9. The following items (as applicable) shall be completed and/or submitted to Building & Safety prior to the issuance of building permits for this project:
a. Precise grading plans shall be approved by Engineering/Public Works b. Rough grading completed and approved by Engineering/Public Works c. Compaction certification
d. Pad elevation certification
e. Rough grade inspection signed off by a City Engineering/Public Works Inspector

10. If hazardous substances are used and/or stored, a technical opinion and report, identifying and developing methods of protection from the hazards presented by the hazardous materials, may be required. This report shall be prepared by a qualified person, firm, or corporation and submitted to Building & Safety. This report shall also explain the proposed facility's intended methods of operation and list all of the proposed materials, their quantities, classifications, and the effects of any chemical (material) inter-mixing in the event of an accident or spill.

Page 56 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 229 of 486 35 11. A Construction Waste Management Plan (CWMP) will be required at time of plan check submittal.

12. At time of plan check submittal, provide and show all required accessible parking stalls along with signage, accessible routes, etc.

13. Provide and show required bicycle parking inclusive of the location of bicycle parking spaces, the type of bicycle parking infrastructure.

14. Provide and show designated parking for clean air vehicles, as applicable.

15. Provide and show designated electric vehicle charging spaces, as applicable.

16. Show the required accessible routes/paths of travel from the public right-of-way to the buildings and from buildings to buildings.

17. A separate fire sprinkler and fire alarm plan shall be submitted to the Indio Fire Department.

18. Submitted plan review documents shall specify complete Code and building data, such as type of construction, occupancy groups and classifications, and so forth.

19. Submitted plan review documents shall include an allowable area analysis.

20. All accessory str uctures (such as walls, fences, trash enclosure, etc.) shall obtain building permits inclusive of any required review and approval of construction documents, as applicable. If the City does not have an applicable standard drawing, an appropriately licensed professional shall provide structural calculations and construction plans accordingly.

21. The applicant shall provide Valley Sanitary District with both civil and architectural drawings of the building and site improvements for review and approval.

22. Valley Sanitary District shall only issue sewer construction and connection permits after plan approval, the payment of all sewer related fees and the submittal of required documents that shall be provided to the Owner/Developer at the time of plan approval.

23. Obtain approval from Burrtec for applicable on-site trash and recycling enclosures and routes.

24. Fire Hydrants: Provide one copy of the water system plans to show there exist fire hydrant(s) capable of delivering the minimum fire flow, per CFC Appendix B Table B105.1, within 400 feet to all portions around the proposed structure. Minimum fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with the CFC and NFPA 14.

Page 57 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 230 of 486 36 25. Provide a copy of a fire flow verification from the local water purveyor, Indio Water Authority, in the form of a letter, and graph depiction specifying the fire flow.

Verification shall be prior to building permit issuance (CFC) 507.3.

26. Construction Permits Fire Department Review: Submittal of construction plans to the Office of the Fire Marshal for development, construction, installation, and operational use permitting shall be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Office of the Fire Marshal reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, California Building Code, California Fire Code, and related codes, which are in effect at the time of building plan submittal.

27. Phased Construction Access: If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access for fire protection prior to any construction (CFC 503.1).

28. Fire Sprinkler Systems: All structures 3,600 square feet or larger, regardless of occupancy type, will be required to install a NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system (CFC 903.2 and NFPA 13) as amended by the City of Indio.

29. Fire Alarm and Detection System: A water flow monitoring system and/or a fire alarm system shall be required in all sprinklered buildings (CFC 903.4, CFC 907.2, and NFPA 72).

30. Submit a final landscape plan inclusive of an irrigation plan for on-site landscaping for administrative review and approval that addresses conformity to Section 3.13.E.1, as applicable and that is subject to review by a CPTED -qualified member of the Indio Police Department.

31. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance to Section 3.10.3.b.1 of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and shall have glass storefront sections set back four (4) feet from façade elevation walls.

32. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance to Section 3.10.3.b.ii of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and shall have windows with an external reflectance of less than 15 percent and a transparency higher than 80 percent and there shall be no opaque windows allowed.

33. The applicant shall demonstrate that there shall not be non-operable shutters or faux shutters for compliance to Section 3.10.3.b.iii.

34. The applicant shall specify on the final landscape plan submitted for administrative review and approval prior to building permit issuance of thorough screening from the public view for the on-site transformer for compliance to Section 3.13.B.2.a.

Page 58 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 231 of 486 37 35. The applicant shall specify on the final landscape plan submitted for administrative review and approval prior to building permit issuance of thorough screening from the public view for the on-site transformer for compliance to Section 3.13.B.2.a.

36. The applicant shall submit for administrative review and approval of a final photometric lighting plan demonstrating compliance to Section 3.13.D.1- 2 of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan.

37. The applicant shall submit construction documents and a final landscape plan prior to the issuance of a building permit demonstrating compliance to the drive-through lane screening requirements of Section 3.14.C.3.b.ii.

38. The applicant shall construction documents specifying the extension of the screen wall and architectural trellis along a portion of the eastern building elevation from the southern edge of the eastern building elevat ion to the southern edge of the first window set on the eastern building elevation and the toping of the screen wall and architectural trellis with a partially enclosed to fully enclosed cover to address architectural integration for conformity to Section 3.14.C.3.c.i.

C. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit:

Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance with the following conditions of approval:

1. The Applicant shall submit PM10 (Dust Control) implementation plans for engineering approval.

2. The Applicant shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan for engineering approval prior to the issuance of any grading permit.

3. The Applicant shall submit for City approval the following items:
a. Precise grading plans – shall include the street address for each lot and building foot print
b. Soils report

4. The Applicant shall provide on-site pretreatment for nuisance and storm water. Also, retain on site nuisance and storm water as required by the approved wat er quality management plan.

5. The design of the project lot pads, street improvements and the storm drainage improvements shall be design coordinated with all adjacent projects or properties to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

6. All grading and pad elevations shall be subject to approval of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer based on grading plans and additional information to be submitted during the engineering plan review process.

Page 59 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 232 of 486 38 7. The Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with one or more recognized Native American Tribes, as applicable, prior to any ground- disturbing activities. The applicant shall bear the responsibility of contacting at a minimum the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians and Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians to determine if a Monitoring Agreement is required and enter into one (1) more Agreement (s) as required. The applicant shall provide to the Community Development Department a copy of one (1) or more executed Monitoring Agreements prior to any ground-disturbing activities.

8. The Applicant shall at all times during any on- site construction comply with the requirements of one (1) or executed Monitoring Agreements.

9. Section 3.13.F (Stormwater) of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan shall be addressed as part of the required Water Quality Management Plan review process managed by the City’s Engineering Division.

D. Prior to or During On-site Construction:

Prior to or during on- site construction, the Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance with the following conditions of approval:

1. Manholes and cleanouts located in paved areas shall be raised to grade and collars and/or traffic rated boxes provided per Valley Sanitary District standards.

2. Applicant shall submit off -site landscape and irrigation plans to the Engineering Division for engineering approval.

3. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit prior to starting any street improvements within public right-of-way.

E. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy:

Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance with the following conditions of approval:

1. The applicant shall install a grease interceptor approved by the Valley Sanitary District for any and all proposed food service establishment type cooking facilities and maintain the interceptor as mandated in the District’s sewer use ordinance.

2. The applicant shall:
a. Dispose of all concrete and asphalt removals from the proposed project to an approved recyclable site.
b. Applicant shall provide City of Indio Public Works Department with a copy of receipt showing tonnage for the disposal of recyclable concrete and asphalt. c. Dispose of all material removals from the proposed project to an approved disposal site.

Page 60 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 233 of 486 39 3. Applicant shall upgrade existing driveways and sidewalks along the project to comply with the American with Disabilities Act, as applicable.

4. Applicant shall remove and replace any damaged or broken concrete, sidewalk and curb/gutter on Highway 111 along the project property frontage.

5. The on-site building and site improvements shall demonstrate compliance to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), as applicable.

6. All improvements shall comply with City standar ds, requirements and policies.

Applicant is required to construct all transition and missing links between existing and proposed improvements.

7. All overhead utilities less than 92kv, located within the project boundaries, bordering the project and/or fronting the project shall be undergrounded, as applicable.

8. Commercial Addressing: All commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and additional locations as required.

Commercial buildings less than 25 feet in height require 12 inch numerals, buildings over 25 feet in height require 24 inch numerals. (CFC 505.1).

9. All exterior lighting shall be oriented, directed, and/or shielded as much as possible so that direct illumination does not infringe onto adjoining properties.

10. The applicant shall obtain required planning approval for all site design features including but not limited to building elevations, parking lot design and landscaping installation.

11. The applicant shall submit for building and planning review and approval trash enclosure plan documents demonstrating compliance to Section 3.13.B.2.c of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan with said plans demonstrating at a minimum the provision of a decorative roof, a steel frame with decorative mesh installed between the top of the wall and the roof structure to allow for air flow, and metal gates to screen the dumpsters from view that will prevent people and animals from unauthorized entrance.

12. The applicant shall physically construct an extension of the planned 36- inch high screen wall with an exterior plaster finish and stone cap to screen the on- site drive- through aisle to the southern edge of the on- site pedestrian crossing from Highway 111 into the project site for compliance to Section 3.13.C of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan.

13. All on-site lighting poles fixtures and lumens shall be installed at the project site in full compliance with the approved final photometric lighting plan

Page 61 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 234 of 486 40 14. A raised on- site pedestrian crossing from Highway 111 through the project site to connect to the primary building entrance shall be constructed in conformance with the approved site plan and shall be comprised of stamped concrete measuring six (6) feet wide and one half of a foot high.

15. The applicant shall completely screen meaning not visible from Highway 111 or adjacent properties on the east, west and south on all sides via roof parapet walls or similar treatment all roof-mounted mechanical equipment.

16. The applicant shall enclose all electrical switchgear within an accessible closet space that will be further screened by landscaping as indicated on the approved final landscape plan.

17. The applicant shall effectively screen from public view water and gas meters with landscaping specified on the approved final landscape plan.

Section 6. Severability. If any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in this resolution is held unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this resolution, or portion thereof, shall be deemed severable, shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

Section 8. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of June 2023.

OSCAR ORTIZ
MAYOR

ATTEST:

SABDI SANCHEZ, CMC

CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATOR

Page 62 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 235 of 486 41 APPROVED AS TO FORM:

STEVEN P. GRAHAM

CITY ATTORNEY

Page 63 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 236 of 486 *IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. © Riverside County GIS
Legend
Project Location Map for Wendy's Drive-Through Restaurant Notes
REPORT PRINTED ON... 2/1/2023 5:14:53 PM
0 376188 Feet
Parcel APNs
Parcels
Blueline Streams
City Areas
SITE

Page 64 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 237 of 486

Page 65 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 238 of 486 1234568
7 91011
01 LIGHT POLE SPEC.SITE INFORMATION

PARKING ANALYSIS

LEGENDGENERAL NOTESACCESSIBILITY NOTES

EV EVEVEVEV

PICK-UPWINDOWPICK-UPWINDOW
02 SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 4:31 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\05 AS1.1 Arch Site Plan.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 4/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
REN. 5/31/23
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 AS1.1

ARCHITECTURALSITE PLAN

Page 66 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 239 of 486 SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/15/2023, 4:43 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\05 AS3.1 DT Details Y.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Y-LANE DRIVE-THRU ORDERSTATION DETAILS
AS3.1
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
2Y-LANE CANOPY FOOTING SECTION
6MENU BOARD FOOTING
4Y-LANE ORDER STATION CANOPY FOOTING
8PRE-SELL BOARD FOOTING
1Y-LANE ORDER STATION PLAN VIEW3Y-LANE ORDER STATION CANOPY 7CANOPY PROTECTION BAR5Y-LANE PROTECTION BAR
C
L
CLEARANCE 9'-0"

Page 67 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 240 of 486 10WALL SECTION
12DROP PIN DETAIL
11NOT USED
EXTEND APRON 15'-0"CONCRETE SLAB
20'-0"
10'-8"
3'-2"3'-6"
10'-4"CL CL9'-10" (CLEAR OPENING)TYP.
5'-11 1/2"
6"
12" 10'-4"
1'-10"3'-4"
10'-4"8"4'-11" (DOOR WIDTH)(TYP.)4'-11" (DOOR WIDTH)(TYP.)2" TYP. 6'-0" (DOOR HEIGHT)(TYP.)
21'-4"
6"
5" MIN6'-0"6"
5" MIN.6'-0"
23'-0"21'-4"
6'-6"
6'-0"5"
7'-5"
1MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE
4FRONT ELEVATION5SIDE ELEVATION
3SIDE ELEVATION2REAR ELEVATION
6ROOF PLAN
12'-8"
22'-0"24'-0" VERIFY
14'-8" VERIFY
3/16
9MESH DETAILS
7ROOF DETAIL8COLUMN DETAIL
2'-0"11"
2'-0"11"
2'-0"11"SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/15/2023, 6:17 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\05 AS3.2 Trash Encl Dt.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23

Page 68 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 241 of 486 V2201
A
B
1 3A3.4
5A3.3
1A3.5
2A3.2
2A3.2
2A3.41A3.4
4A3.3
3A3.3 1A3.7
1A3.1
1A3.1
1A3.21A3.2
2A3.1
2A3.1
CREW114UTILITY116
COOLER111
FREEZER110
RECEIVING112
ALL-GENDER RM.102
SERVICE104KITCHEN106
DRIVE THRU105
DINING101
OFFICE108
ALL-GENDER RM.103
1 5 6
4 3
10 2
8 7 9
6 A A
C
C
A
A
C
C
1 12
14 15
15 1516
1818
2 2021
2222
23 27
28 28
28 4
4 4
5 5
7 7
8 9
25 25
SIM.

WE POINT =F.O.S.
1FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"
01A2.4
01A2.3
02A2.4
02A2.3
SHADED AREA = SHEAR WALLDIAGONAL HATCH = METAL STUD WALLSSTIPPLE = SOUND BATT INSULATION 26 GENERAL NOTESA.EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF SHEATHING TOFACE OF SHEATHING U.N.O. INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TOFACE OF STUD U.N.O.B.COORDINATE CURB CUTS AT DOORS WITH STOREFRONTMANUFACTURER PRODUCT DETAILS AND SHOP DRAWINGS.C.REFER TO FINISH PLAN AND INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOREXTENT OF INTERIOR FINISHES.D.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOLID WOOD BLOCKINGFOR WALL MOUNTED ITEMS, EQUIPMENT, MILLWORK, ETC.COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH OWNER'S CONSTRUCTIONREPRESENTATIVE AS NECESSARY.E.REFER TO WALL TYPES ON SHEET A4.3.F.REFER TO DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A6.3.G.AN OPTIONAL PANELIZED EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM ISAVAILABLE THROUGH RED-BUILT- SEE SUPPLIER LIST FORCONTACT INFORMATION. G.C. MUST COORDINATE WITH AOR,OWNER, AND RED-BUILT TO VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE,PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS, AND INSTALLATION CRITERIA.LEGEND 9 CURB, REF. CIVILDRAWINGS
12 4A3.4
SIM 1A3.4
3A2.2PAY WINDOW113
5 3A3.5
2A3.5
4 2 1
5 13'-7"
2"
37'-7 1/2" 11'-7" R.O.
6'-8" 18'-0" 12'-8" 10'-5"6 1/2"8'-9" R.O.3'-4 1/2"6 1/2"4'-0 1/2" R.O.2'-1" 6 1/2"1'-10"R.O.
6 1/2"1'-10"R.O.14'-2"3'-10"
4'-8"
4'-8"
4'-2"3'-0"4'-8"
10'-3 1/2"R.O.8"8'-8 1/2"R.O.9 1/2"
4'-8"
4'-8"
75'-3 1/2"
7'-4"6'-0 1/2"14'-7 1/2"
32'-3 1/2"
6" 11"6"
35'-5"
17'-8"6'-2 1/2"
75'-9" 1'-4"
3"9 1/2"
10'-9"11'-9"9'-10"8"
13'-6 1/2" F.O. FDN TO F.O. FDN
37'-4 1/2"
37'-2"
ABC
2 X 4 FRAMING @ 16" O.C.3 12" METAL STUD @ 16" O.C.2 X 6 FRAMING @ 16" O.C.SEE A5.1 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 36'-8"F.O. FDN TO F.O. FDN.
7'-4 1/2"21'-2 1/2"3'-5"4'-10"
5 1/2"1'-6 1/2"5 1/2"2'-1"20'-6 1/2"4'-10 1/2"
5'-7 1/2"
3'-4"5'-6"3'-3"7'-5 1/2"5 1/2"7'-0"4'-0 1/2"
5'-10"
11 14'-9"
14 4'-11"
4'-11" 4'-6"
15 7 C
3 B
#CODED NOTES:1.WALK-IN FREEZER/COOLER MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE REINFORCED FRAMEDOPENING FOR DOOR AS SCHEDULED.2.APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FRONT COUNTER. REF. SHEET A5.1 FOR LOCATION.3.G.C. TO INSTALL STAINLESS STEEL CORNER GUARD, REFER TO FINISH PLAN SHEET FORLOCATIONS AND TYPE OF CORNER GUARDS.4.SHADED AREA INDICATES SHEAR WALL, REF. STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. COORDINATEFINISHES WITH NUM. OF PLIES PROVIDED. EXTEND PLYWOOD AS REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN FINISH PLANE.5.ROOF/ PARAPET OVERHANG ABOVE. REFER TO ROOF PLAN, SECTIONS,AND EXTERIORELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.6.PREFABRICATED USED COOKING OIL MANAGEMENT ENCLOSURE. PROVIDE MIN. 6"THICK, 7'-4" X 3'-6" CONC. SLAB.7.SOFFIT / BULKHEAD ABOVE, REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN.8.6" DIA. CONCRETE FILLED METAL PIPE BOLLARD W/ BOLLARD SLEEVE. INSTALL BOLLARDPER CIVIL DRAWINGS.9.ROOF HATCH & LADDER. 04/A1.310.RECESSED MOP SINK, INSTALL WATERPROOF MEMBRANE IN MOP SINK RECESS TO TIEINTO DRAIN. REF DETAIL ON A5.1.11.EXHAUST HOOD, REF. MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.12.STAINLESS STEEL PANELS BEHIND AND BESIDE FRYERS & GRILL. REFER TO INTERIORELEVATIONS & FINISH PLAN FOR EXTENTS.13.INTERMEDIATE SUPPORT FOR BATTEN PATIO ENCLOSURE. COORDINATE WITHMANUFACTURER.14.EQUIPMENT CURB BY KITCHEN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTOR. REF. SHEET A5.1 FORLOCATIONS. REF. SHEET A5.2 FOR EQUIPMENT CURB DETAILS.15.6" C.M.U. CURB BELOW STOREFRONT. REFER TO SECTION AND STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.16.PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL, REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS.17.STAINLESS STEEL CLOSURE TRIM / ANGLES BY GC.

18.AWNING / CANOPY ABOVE.19.SEMI-RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET, SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY GC.REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS.20.PRE-MANUFACTURED SWITCHGEAR CABINET ON 6" CONC. CURB. REF. DETAILS 3/A1.1 &6/A5.2.21.CLEAR FLOOR AREA TO BE MAINTAINED IN FRONT OF ELECTRICAL PANELS MIN 3'-0" ASREQUIRED BY NEC.22.PRE-FINISHED DOWNSPOUT. EXTEND 6" PVC W/ CAP UNDERGROUND & CONNECT TOSTORM. SEE CIVIL AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.23.HOT WATER TANK ON SHELF. TOP OF SHELF 4'-0" AFF. REFER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS,DETAIL 04/S2.3.24.1/2" ISOLATION JOINT25.EDGE OF CONCRETE SLAB / FOUNDATION FOR WALK-IN BOX. REF. STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.26.RAMP BY WIB MANUFACTURER.27.PROVIDE IN WALL BLOCKING FOR MOUNTING ARM OF CUSTOMER ORDER PICKUPSCREEN - COORDINATE WITH MOUNTING ARM SPEC. BOTTOM OF SCREEN TO BEMOUNTED 6'-10" AFF.28.WALK-IN-BOX. FREEZER SUPPLIED WITH INSULATED FLOOR.29.CONTROL JOINT30.HOLD DOWNS PROVIDED BY WIB MANUFACTURER G.C. TO DRILL AND EPOXY SETANCHOR BOLTS AS REQUIRED. VERIFY LOCATIONS AND QUANTITY WITHMANUFACTURER.31.C/T CABINET AND ELECTRIC METER AT THIS LOCATION. COORDINATE WITH LOCALUTILITY COMPANY. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.32.FACE OF SHEATHING / FACE OF FOUNDATION33.INSTALL 1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING BEHIND GYPSUM BOARD TO MAINTAIN FINISHALIGNMENT WITH BULKHEAD ABOVE. 10'-10 1/2"1'-9 1/2"2'-0 1/2"
11'-9"
10'-10" R.O.10'-11 1/2" R.O.
16'-1 1/2" R.O.
10 AA
1'-9 1/2"
13'-6 1/2"
2'-5"5'-1"4'-9 1/2"7'-9"
6'-5"5'-6"
4'-0"
1'-5 1/2"1'-2 1/2"
2'-10"8"5 1/2"
4'-2"
3 1/2"8'-3"
8'-10"
A
4'-0"
C5 1/2"
3232
32 32
32 33
7'-11 1/2"
79 SEATS

STONEVENEER
18 18
PRE-WIRE FORFUTURE KIOSK2" CONDUITSUNDER SLAB
SERVICE DOORPROVIDED BYG.C
3'-11 1/2"6"
5'-6"3 1/2"6"7"5'-4"7"
12'-0" F.O.F6'-2" F.O.F

AIRCURTAIN

AIRCURTAIN
ACM1 MARSAIRCURTAIN ONMICROSWITCH
1'-3"
1A3.3
3 1/2"5'-4"
30 2A3.72A3.3
6'-9"
6'-9"
ACCESSIBLESALESCOUNTER+34" PER11B-902.35'-0" MIN.

HEALTH DEPT. NOTES1.ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS ARE FIXED.
3'-0"MIN.
3'-8"3'-8"
6'-6"3'-8" 3'-8"
10'-4" 4'-9"
5'-1"4'-9"2'-4"2'-4"2'-4"2'-5"2'-4 1/2"
8"
4'-0 1/2"
3'-8" 3'-8"
3'-8"
2'-3"2'-3"
2'-3"
1'-11"
2'-4"
8 76"
3'-9" 3'-9" 3'-9" 3'-9"7'-1 1/2"7'-1 1/2"
1'-4 1/2"
1'-4 1/2"CONC. CURBTYP. CONC. CURBTYP.
18'-0"3'-11 1/2"
℄7"
℄12 12"
4"
4"
3PLAN DETAIL1/2" = 1'-0"
CONC. CURBELECTRICALPANELS
BASE
1'-1"WESCO1'-1 1/2"CPI 5'-5 1/2"6A5.2
V2201
2KITCHEN DIMENSION PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"
W.E. POINT
14'-2 5/8" R.FRM11'-8" R.FRM14'-2 5/8" FIN. DIM.11'-7" FIN. DIM.

FLOOR PLAN
A1.1
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 2:23 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\10 A1.1 Floor Plan.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 69 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 242 of 486 6'-10"5'-5"
SLOPE: 1/4" PER 1'-0"
SLOPE: 1/4" PER 1'-0"
SLOPE: 1/4"PER 1'-0"
3A3.4
5A3.3
1A3.5
2A3.22A3.2
2A3.5
2A3.41A3.4
4A3.3
3A3.3 2A3.3
1A3.1
1A3.1
2A3.1
1 1
1 10
10 10
11 11
32 13
13 15
15 15 15
15 15
15 17 17
1919
20 2020
20 2121 21
22 23
25 25
25 28
3 12
5 5
55 6
6 9 9
1A3.3
GENERAL NOTESA.ROOF WORK TO BE INSTALLED WITH COMPATIBLE WENDY'S APPROVED ROOFMATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. PROVIDE AND INSTALL ROOF INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO, INSULATION BOARD, EDGE FLASHING(S), COPINGS, SEALEDTERMINATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATIONINSTRUCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. AT PENETRATIONS/ ATTACHMENTS IN THEROOF, FLASH/ PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT SEAL PER ROOFING SYSTEMMANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR SHALLENSURE THE ENTIRE ROOF SHALL BE WEATHER AND WATER TIGHT WITH POSITIVEDRAINAGE TO THE ROOF DRAINS AND NO PONDING.B.ROOFING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL RIGID INSULATION (PER LOCAL ENERGYCODE) AND PRIOR TO MEMBRANE INSTALLATION. SYSTEM TO BE COMPLETE WITHALL ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTS AND INSTALLATION REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A FULLMANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY. 1ROOF PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"
#CODED NOTES:1.LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW.2.PRE-MANUFACTURED 4" x 8" THRU-WALL SCUPPER, REFER TO DETAIL 12/A4.3.3.EXTEND SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF TO TERMINATION BAR UNDER COUNTERFLASHING TO PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT SEAL. REFER TO DETAIL 8/A4.3.4.WALK-IN BOX FRAMING AND ROOFING SYSTEM BY GC.5.PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AROUND ALL ROOF CURBS.6.INSTALL PIPE FLASHING FOR ROOF MOUNTED CONDENSERS LINES. REFER TODETAIL 3/A4.3 AND 4/A4.37.ICE MACHINE CONDENSER FOR DINING ROOM FREESTYLE MACHINE. REFER TODETAIL 5/A4.4 FOR CURB.8.KITCHEN ICE MACHINE CONDENSER. REFER TO DETAIL 5/A4.4 FOR CURB.9.PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COLLECTOR BOX (W/ OVERFLOW SLOT) & DOWNSPOUTTO STORM SEWER BELOW. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.10.PARAPET VENTING BY ROOF MEMBRANE MANUFACTURER. MIN. 1 VENT PERFIREBLOCKED AREA.11.MECHANICALLY FASTEN SINGLE-PLY ROOF MEMBRANE OVER CONTINUOUS RIGIDBOARD INSULATION OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING.12.PLUMBING VENT PIPE. REFER TO DETAIL 9/A4.3 FOR REQUIRED FLASHINGREQUIREMENTS13.WALK-IN FREEZER / COOLER REMOTE CONDENSER. REFER TO ELECTRICALDRAWINGS. INSTALLED BY WALK-IN-BOX SUPPLIER. FINAL CONNECTIONS BYCONTRACTOR.14.LADDER RECEIVER/HOOK & SAFETY GATE FOR ROOF ACCESS. REFER TO DETAIL1/A4.3.15.EXTEND ROOF MEMBRANE UP/OVER PARAPET & FLASH TO PRE-FINISHEDALUMINUM ROOF DRIP EDGE OR GRAVEL STOP. REFER TO WALL SECTIONS.16.ROOF MEMBRANE OVER FANFOLD INSULATION ON PATIO ROOF.17.METAL CANOPY / AWNING. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND WALLSSECTIONS FOR MORE DETAIL.18.SHADED AREA INDICATES AREA OF ROOF TO RECEIVE WALKWAY PAD.19.ROOFTOP UNIT. REFER TO DETAIL 6/A4.3 AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS20.PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM DRIP EDGE, REFER TO WALL SECTIONS.21.HATCH PATTERN INDICATES AREAS OF TAPERED INSULATION OVER SPECIFIEDRIGID THERMAL INSULATION AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ROOF DRAINAGE. G.C. TOCOORDINATE ACTUAL EXTENTS OF TAPERED INSULATION MATERIALS WITH ROOFINSTALLER PROPER COUNTER SLOPE AS REQUIRED BY CODE.22.DASHED LINE INDICATES CLEAR AREA REQUIRED FOR THE HVAC UNIT AIR INTAKE.LOCATE ALL EXHAUST AIR DEVICES OUTSIDE OF 10'-0" RADIUS (TYP).23.COOK CENTER CONDENSER. SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY KED. FINALCONNECTION BY CONTRACTOR.24.RTU MOUNTED SCREENING25.EXHAUST FAN, REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION.26.OVERFLOW DRAIN. REF. DETAIL 13/A4.3. FIELD LOCATE TO BE 2" HIGHER THAN THEMAIN DRAIN.27.ROOF DRAIN. REF. DETAIL 13/A4.3. CONNECT LEADER TO UNDERGROUND STORMSYSTEM.28.PRE-MANUFACTURED THRU-WALL SCUPPER, 6" (H) x 12" (W) MINIMUM. BASE TOALIGN WITH ROOF MEMBRANE TO ALLOW WATER TO "PASS THRU"29.LED UPLIGHT. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.30.3/8" PLYWOOD DRAFTS STOP AT 20'-0" MAX. INTERVALS HORIZONTALLY, TYP.31.FIRE BLOCKING AT 10'-0" MAX. INTERVALS HORIZONTALLY, TYP.32.DORMER VENT.33.G.C TO PROVIDE ACCESS PANELS FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS AS REQUIRED. 4'-10 1/2"
6'-4"
30 30
31 31
31 10
31 2A3.1
10' -0" MIN.
10' -0" MIN.

SLOPE
27 26
15 3A3.5
6 30
ALTERNATEEF-2 LOCATION
5 18
1A3.21A3.2
NOTE TO BIDDER:BASE BID: 40 MIL. ROOFMEMBRANEALTERNATE BID: 50 MIL. - PEREXTENDED WARRANTY.

NOTE: UPPER ROOF TODRAIN TO LOWER ROOF
ALL RIDGED ROOFING INSULATION IN THE DININGROOM IS TO BE FASTEN ABOVE DECK WITH NOEXPOSED FASTENERS BELOW THE DECKSURFACE IN EXPOSED TRUSSES AND PATIO. 17 17
11 21
31 SLOPE: 1/4"PER 1'-0"
SLOPE: 1/4"PER 1'-0"
21 EF-350 LBSRTU-11,400 LBSRTU-22,900 LBS
EF-290 LBS
EF-190 LBS
SLOPE: 1/4"PER 1'-0"
04LADDER & ROOF SCUTTLESCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"
ROOF SCUTTLEMIN. 22"X24"

SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS FOR JOISTSSIZE,SPACING, HEADERS & ROOF DECKING SADDLE 24 GA. GALV. STEEL FLASHING,ROOF MATERIAL OVER
R-30 INSULATION, TYP. SEE SPECS
2X4 WD. STUDS @ 16" O.C.W/ 5/8" TYPE 'X' W.R GYP. BD.
2X4 OR 2X6 WD STUDS @ 16" O.C.W/ 5/8" TYPE 'X' W.R. GYP. BD.GYP BD. CEILINGPAINTED STEEL LADDER W/3/4" RINGS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE W/ALL PROVISIONS OF 2018 INTERNATIONALMECHANICAL CODE 306.5,FLOOR LINE LADDERPORT ROOFHATCH SAFETY GRAB BARSSTOCK #: F3002NOT LESS THAN 30" ABOVEROOF PER CMC 304.3ALL FIXED LADDERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE W/ THE FOLLOWING:A. SIDE RAILINGS SHALL EXTEND NOT LESS THAN 30" ABOVE THE ROOF OR PARAPET WALLB. LANDINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 18' APART MEASURED FROM THE FINISHED GRADEC. WIDTH SHALL BE NOT LESSS THAN 18" BETWEEN SIDE RAILS.D. RUNGS SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 12" ON CENTER AND EACH RUNG SHALL BE CAPABLEOF SUPPORTING A 300 LB. LOADE. TOE SPACE SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 6" 05ROOF DRAIN & OVER FLOWSCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
03DORMER VENT DETAILSCALE: N.T.S02DUROLAST DETAILSCALE: N.T.S FUTURE SOLAR ZONE112 SQ. FT.14'-0" X 8'-0"
FUTURE SOLAR ZONE216 SQ. FT.27'-0" X 8'-0"
SLOPE:1/4"PER1'-0" 1111
SLOPE:1/4"PER1'-0"
1111
32 3230

NO BRACING REQ'DAT ROOF HATCH
10' -0" MIN.
10' -0" MIN.
21 ROOF PLAN
A1.3
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 9:11 AM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\10 A1.3 Roof Plan.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 70 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 243 of 486 1A3.5 2A3.21A3.24A2.1
3A3.31A3.3 1A3.1
3A3.4
2A3.1
PEX-11
2WEST ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
BEYOND
1NORTH ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
EQEQCL8"
6'-3"
M-4 M-5
PEX-11
SF-1
M-3ACM-1
FLUSH MOUNT WENDY'SSIGNAGE & WHITELETTERS TO BE PROV'DBY SIGN SUPPLIER. G.C.TO PROVIDE BLOCKINGAS REQ'D.

PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .
6'-3"
M-4
BLADE LIGHTING,SEE ELECT.3'-0"
JOINT, TYP.

M-5
T.O. BLADE FRAMING25' - 0"T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"LED STRIP LIGHTINGIN CORNICE WALL BEYOND,SEE BUILDINGSECT.

SF-1STOREFRONT -"DARK BRONZE"ST-1EL DORADO RUSTIC LEDGE - "SAWTOOTH BLEND"PUWPICK-UP WINDOW TO MATCH STOREFRONTBL-1BOLLARD SLEEVE - "YELLOW"M-1PARAPET CAP/ BRAKE METAL - "DARK BRONZE"M-3EXCEPTIONAL METALS - "BRIGHT RED"M-4EXCEPTIONAL METALS - "SILVER METALLIC"M-5BRAKE METAL - "CLEAR ANNODIZED"M-7EXCEPTIONAL METALS - "CUSTOM DARK GREY"PEX-1PAINT - DARK BRONZEPEX-3PRE-FINISHED DARK BRONZE SIGN CABINETSPEX-4WENDY'S GREYPEX-6PRE-FINISHED WALK-IN FREEZER / COOLER DARK BRONZEPEX-7WENDY'S FIELD BROWNPEX-10PAINT / POWDER COAT- BLACKPEX-11PAINT- WENDY'S TANPEX-12PAINT- DARK GREYACM-1BLADE WALL REDACM-5D.T TOWER

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
8'-10" TYP.
1'-4"
EQ.

M-4
PEX-11
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"ROOF LINEBEYONDSTO. REVEAL,TYP.

T.O. FRAMING11' - 6"

BEYONDBEYOND
M-5ACM-1 M-4
SF-1
M-3T.O. BLADE FRAMING23' - 0"
T.O. DINING PARAPET16' - 8"
FLUSH-MOUNT WENDY'SSIGNAGE PROVIDED BY SIGNSUPPLIER. G.C. TO PROVIDEBLOCKING AS REQUIRED.LED STRIPLIGHTING INCORNICE EQ.

M-7ACM-5
PARGE COAT (GREY)@ CURB TYP.

T.O. DINING PARAPET16' - 8"
T.O. GLAZING11' - 6"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
T.O. GLAZING11' - 6"B.O. LVL8' - 10"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
6'-3"
4'-0" CANOPY UNDERSEPARATE PERMIT
FLUSH MOUNT WENDY'S SIGNAGE& WHITE LETTERS TO BE PROV'DBY SIGN SUPPLIER. G.C. TOPROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQ'D.

EQ.

SPANDREL GLASS.
4"
4"
STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1
SPANDRELGLASS.

EXT. PLASTERPILASTERPROTRUDES 2".FURR OUT WALLAS REQ'D
2" MIN@ PAV.4" MINSOIL
GALV. NAILSBRICK VENEERMORTARSCRATCH COAT3.4 GALV. METAL LATHWEATHER RESISTANTBARRIER (2 LAYERS)SHEATHINGSTUDS 16" O.C.STONE VENEERMORTARSCRATCH COAT3.4 GALV. METAL LATHWEATHER RESISTANT BARRIER(2 LAYERS)SHEATHINGSTUDS 16" O.C.FOUNDATIONWEEP SCREED 6BRICK VENEER DETAILN.T.S
NOTE: REAR BUILDING FASCIA DOES NOT ALLOW FOR THE LED TAPE LIGHT 4"4" 4" 4"4"4" 4" 4"
T.O. FRAMING14' - 4"
EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ. EQ.EQ.4" 4" 4"
3'-0"10'-9"
EQ.

STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1PARGE COAT(GREY) @ ALLSLAB STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1 STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1WALL HYDRANT,REF. PLUMBINGSHEETS.

PEX-11 M-4PEX-11M-4PEX-11
3'-0"
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .BEYONDM-5
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .BEYONDM-5
M-5
3NOT USED 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
M-7ACM-5M-7ACM-5T.O. FRAMING16' - 9"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
5TRELLIS ELEVATION TYP.1/4" = 1'-0"
4'-0" CANOPYUNDERSEPARATEPERMIT
NOTE: FOR EXTERIOR FINISHES SEE A6.2
2X12 T.S @24" O.CM-5
4PILASTER DETAIL 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
STO. REVEAL,TYP.
2A3.3
PEX-11
M-1 M-1
WINDOWS ARE TO HAVE REFLECTIVE LESSTHAN 15% AND TRANSPARENCY HIGHER THAN80% OPAQUE WINDOW ARE PROHIBITED.PLANNING NOTES T.O. BLADE23'-0"

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2.1
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/18/2023, 9:08 AM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\20 A2.1 Ext Elev.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 71 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 244 of 486 4A3.3
1A3.22A3.2
2A3.41A3.4 1A3.42A3.1
12A4.2
5A3.31A3.1
1EAST ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
M-1
M-4 M-7
BLADE BEYONDREVEAL, TYP.ROOF LINE
SERVICE DOOR,SEE DOOR SCH.PAINT PEX-1.GREASE AND CO2TANK CLOSET2SOUTH ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0" PRE-MANUFACTUREDCANOPY.

STO. REVEAL, TYP.

EQ.EQ.EQ. EQ.

M-5
T.O. TOWER FRAMING23' - 0"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
B.O. CANOPY9' - 4"
T.O. FRAMING21 - 5"
2'-912"PEX-11ACM-5
ACM-1
8'-10"
EQEQCL
EQ.EQ.6'-3"
6'-3"6'-3"M-1 M-1
M-7
BL-1 BL-1
ACM-5ACM-5
PEX-11
M-7T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"
B.O. CANOPY9' - 4"
PRE-MANUFAC'DCANOPY .

STO. REVEAL,TYP.

ROOF LINE
FLUSH-MOUNT WENDY'SSIGNAGE (WHITE LETTERS)PROVIDED BY SIGNSUPPLIER. G.C. TO PROVIDEBLOCK'G AS REQ'D.

PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .
3'-3"M-5
M-5
SF-1 SF-1 SF-1
P.U.W., SEEWINDOW SCH.

EQ.EQ.

T.O. FRAMING14' - 4"
WALL MOUNT'DLIGHT FIXTURE,TYP.
3REAR DRIVE-THRU ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
SF-1
M-7ACM-5
B.O. CANOPY9' - 4"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
6'-3"6'-3"
T.O. BLADE FRAMING23' - 0"
T.O. DINING PARAPET16' - 8"
T.O. GLAZING11' - 6"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
8'-10"
2'-5"
M-3ACM-1
M-5M-4
SF-1
FLUSH-MOUNT WENDY'S SIGNAGEPROVIDED BY SIGN SUPPLIER.G.C. TO PROVIDE BLOCKING ASREQUIRED.

BLADE LIGHTING,SEE ELECT.

PEX-11LED TAPE LIGHTINGIN CORNICE
EQ.EQ.

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
M-1
BL-1
6'-3"
6'-3"
M-3
T.O. FRAMING21 - 5"
SPANDREL GLASS.

WALL HYDRANT,SEE PLUMBINGDWGS. SF-1
M-4PEX-11M-4T.O. FRAMING11' - 6"
PEX-11
M-4PEX-11M-4PEX-11
SF-1BL-1
PEX-11M-4
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .BEYONDM-5
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .BEYONDM-5#####LED ILLUMINATED BOX FORADDRESS NUMERS M-7ACM-5T.O. FRAMING16' - 9"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
PRE-MANUFACTUREDCANOPY.M-52X12 T.S @24" O.C
M-7ACM-5T.O. FRAMING16' - 9"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
M-52X12 T.S @24" O.C
NOTE: FOR EXTERIOR FINISHES SEE A6.2
WINDOWS ARE TO HAVE REFLECTIVE LESSTHAN 15% AND TRANSPARENCY HIGHER THAN80% OPAQUE WINDOW ARE PROHIBITED.PLANNING NOTES

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2.2
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 1:43 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\20 A2.1 Ext Elev.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 72 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 245 of 486 1EAST ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
EQEQCL
6'-3"
6'-3"6'-3"
M-7ACM-5ACM-5
PEX-11
M-7T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"
B.O. CANOPY9' - 4"
STO. REVEAL,TYP.

EQ.

T.O. FRAMING14' - 4"
T.O. BLADE FRAMING23' - 0"
T.O. DINING PARAPET16' - 8"
T.O. GLAZING11' - 6"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
8'-10"
M-3ACM-1
M-5M-4 FLUSH-MOUNT WENDY'S SIGNAGEPROVIDED BY SIGN SUPPLIER.G.C. TO PROVIDE BLOCKING ASREQUIRED.

BLADE LIGHTING,SEE ELECT.

PEX-11LED TAPE LIGHTINGIN CORNICE
EQ.EQ.
6'-3" SPANDREL GLASS.
4"4"
EQ.
4"M-4PEX-11M-4T.O. FRAMING11' - 6"
PEX-11M-4
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .BEYONDM-5#####LED ILLUMINATED BOX FORADDRESS NUMERST.O. DT. PORTE COCHERE16' - 8" M-7ACM-5M-7ACM-5 SF-1STOREFRONT -"DARK BRONZE"ST-1EL DORADO RUSTIC LEDGE - "SAWTOOTH BLEND"PUWPICK-UP WINDOW TO MATCH STOREFRONTBL-1BOLLARD SLEEVE - "YELLOW"M-1PARAPET CAP/ BRAKE METAL - "DARK BRONZE"M-3EXCEPTIONAL METALS - "BRIGHT RED"M-4EXCEPTIONAL METALS - "SILVER METALLIC"M-5BRAKE METAL - "CLEAR ANNODIZED"M-7EXCEPTIONAL METALS - "CUSTOM DARK GREY"PEX-1PAINT - DARK BRONZEPEX-3PRE-FINISHED DARK BRONZE SIGN CABINETSPEX-4WENDY'S GREYPEX-6PRE-FINISHED WALK-IN FREEZER / COOLER DARK BRONZEPEX-7WENDY'S FIELD BROWNPEX-10PAINT / POWDER COAT- BLACKPEX-11PAINT- WENDY'S TANPEX-12PAINT- DARK GREYACM-1BLADE WALL REDACM-5D.T TOWER

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
NOTE: FOR EXTERIOR FINISHES SEE A6.2
WINDOWS ARE TO HAVE REFLECTIVE LESSTHAN 15% AND TRANSPARENCY HIGHER THAN80% OPAQUE WINDOW ARE PROHIBITED.PLANNING NOTES 3'-0"
8'-10"
2A3.4
BL-1P.U.W., SEEWINDOW SCH.
1A3.4
2'-5"
P.U.W., SEEWINDOW SCH.
1A3.11A3.42A3.1
WALL MOUNT'DLIGHT FIXTURE,TYP.SF-1 SF-1
5A3.3
ST-1STONE VENEERWAINSCOT
3'-0" H WALL W/ EXT.PLAST. PAINT PEX11WITH STONE CAP, TYP. D.T ELEVATIONWITH PORTE COCHERE A2.3
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 1:09 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\20 A2.1 Ext Elev.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 73 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 246 of 486 BUILDING SECTION GRAL. NOTESA.SEAL EXTERIOR WALL AND ROOF PENETRATIONS ANDJOINTS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS TO ENSURE ACOMPLETELY WEATHER-TIGHT SEAL. SEALANT LOCATIONSINCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO : LIGHT FIXTUREMOUNTS, DOOR AND WINDOW FRAMES, FASCIA EDGES,SIGNAGE MOUNTS, CONDUIT PENETRATIONS, SCUPPERS,ELECTRICAL OUTLETS, HOSE BIBS, AND UTILITY SERVICEENTRANCES. REFER TO JOINT TREATMENT SCHEDULE.B.PROVIDE CONTINUOUS WEATHER BARRIER BEHIND ALLEXTERIOR FINISHES. UTILIZE COMMERCIAL GRADEBUILDING WRAP AT CORRUGATED METAL PANELS. UTILIZEFLUID APPLIED OR SELF ADHERING WEATHER BARRIER ATMASONRY, EIFS, TILE FIBER CEMENT PANELS AND ACM. LAP& TAPE ALL SEAMS. LAP OVER ALL FLASHING. COORDINATETRANSITIONS PER MFR'S RECOMMENDATIONS. APPROVEDALTERNATE: PROVIDE FLUID APPLIED OR SELF ADHERINGWEATHER BARRIER BEHIND ALL EXTERIOR FINISHES.C.EXTERIOR SIDEWALKS AND PAVING ARE SHOWN FORDESIGN INTENT ONLY. G.C. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATING SCOPE OF WORK WITH OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE AND/OR CIVIL DRAWINGS.D.GRADES SHALL BE 2" MIN. BELOW FLOOR SLAB AND SHALLSLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING @ 5% SLOPE EXCEPT @PEDESTRIAN PATHS WHICH SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROMBUILDING @ 1/8" PER FOOT MIN. AND 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.E.ITEMS MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE PARAPET ARE TO BE SETIN A FULL BED OF SEALANT AND HAVE FULL DEPTHBLOCKING IMMEDIATELY BELOW CAP, FASCIA, ANDDRIP EDGE.F.REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLAN AND DETAILS FORADDITIONAL FRAMING REQUIREMENTS.G.PROVIDE CONTINUOUS CLASS 1 OR CLASS 2 VAPORRETARDER ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE WALLFRAMING AND BEHIND APPLIED WALL FINISHSHEATHING IN ASHRAE ZONES MARINE 4 AND 5 THROUGH 8.LAP AND TAPE ALL SEAMS TO ACHIEVE CONTINUOUSCOVERAGE OVER THE ENTIRE UNFENESTRATEDBUILDING ENVELOPE.H.INSULATION AND VAPOR RETARDER IN EXPOSED AREAS TOHAVE A FLAME SPREAD OF 25 AND A SMOKE DEVELOPMENTOF 450 OR BETTER.I.VAPOR RETARDER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONTINUOUSSHEETS FROM FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF DECK. ALLSEAMS AND PENETRATIONS SHALL BE SEALED PERMANUFACTURER'S DIRECTION. 3A3.5 2A3.21A3.2
2A3.21A3.2
1A3.3SIM
1A3.4
2BUILDING SECTION1/4" = 1'-0"
1BUILDING SECTION1/4" = 1'-0"
EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.PEX-11
2A3.5
2A3.3SIM.OPP.

T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"
T.O. CONCRETE SLAB0' - 0"REF.STRUCTURAL
B.O. CANOPY9' - 4"
T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 15"
B.O. HEADER11' - 6"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"REF.STRUCTURAL
ACM-5M-7 M-44'-8"ALIGN REVEALWITH FACEBELOW
6'-11"
7'-1"
2'-6"
1'-10"T.O. CORNICE16' - 8"

DRIVE-THRUPORTECOCHERE &TRELLIS

DRIVE-THRUPORTECOCHERE &TRELLIS
T.O. TOWER16' - 8"
T.O. TOWER16' - 8"

AC UNITEXHAUST FANS

BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.1
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 12:07 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\30 A3.1 Wall Sect.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 74 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 247 of 486 BUILDING SECTION GRAL. NOTESA.SEAL EXTERIOR WALL AND ROOF PENETRATIONS ANDJOINTS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS TO ENSURE ACOMPLETELY WEATHER-TIGHT SEAL. SEALANT LOCATIONSINCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO : LIGHT FIXTUREMOUNTS, DOOR AND WINDOW FRAMES, FASCIA EDGES,SIGNAGE MOUNTS, CONDUIT PENETRATIONS, SCUPPERS,ELECTRICAL OUTLETS, HOSE BIBS, AND UTILITY SERVICEENTRANCES. REFER TO JOINT TREATMENT SCHEDULE.B.PROVIDE CONTINUOUS WEATHER BARRIER BEHIND ALLEXTERIOR FINISHES. UTILIZE COMMERCIAL GRADEBUILDING WRAP AT CORRUGATED METAL PANELS. UTILIZEFLUID APPLIED OR SELF ADHERING WEATHER BARRIER ATMASONRY, EIFS, TILE FIBER CEMENT PANELS AND ACM. LAP& TAPE ALL SEAMS. LAP OVER ALL FLASHING. COORDINATETRANSITIONS PER MFR'S RECOMMENDATIONS. APPROVEDALTERNATE: PROVIDE FLUID APPLIED OR SELF ADHERINGWEATHER BARRIER BEHIND ALL EXTERIOR FINISHES.C.EXTERIOR SIDEWALKS AND PAVING ARE SHOWN FORDESIGN INTENT ONLY. G.C. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATING SCOPE OF WORK WITH OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE AND/OR CIVIL DRAWINGS.D.GRADES SHALL BE 2" MIN. BELOW FLOOR SLAB AND SHALLSLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING @ 5% SLOPE EXCEPT @PEDESTRIAN PATHS WHICH SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROMBUILDING @ 1/8" PER FOOT MIN. AND 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.E.ITEMS MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE PARAPET ARE TO BE SETIN A FULL BED OF SEALANT AND HAVE FULL DEPTHBLOCKING IMMEDIATELY BELOW CAP, FASCIA, ANDDRIP EDGE.F.REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLAN AND DETAILS FORADDITIONAL FRAMING REQUIREMENTS.G.PROVIDE CONTINUOUS CLASS 1 OR CLASS 2 VAPORRETARDER ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE WALLFRAMING AND BEHIND APPLIED WALL FINISHSHEATHING IN ASHRAE ZONES MARINE 4 AND 5 THROUGH 8.LAP AND TAPE ALL SEAMS TO ACHIEVE CONTINUOUSCOVERAGE OVER THE ENTIRE UNFENESTRATEDBUILDING ENVELOPE.H.INSULATION AND VAPOR RETARDER IN EXPOSED AREAS TOHAVE A FLAME SPREAD OF 25 AND A SMOKE DEVELOPMENTOF 450 OR BETTER.I.VAPOR RETARDER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONTINUOUSSHEETS FROM FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF DECK. ALLSEAMS AND PENETRATIONS SHALL BE SEALED PERMANUFACTURER'S DIRECTION. 1A3.1
1A3.1
3A3.4
2A3.5
2A3.54A3.3
2BUILDING SECTION1/4" = 1'-0"
1BUILDING SECTION1/4" = 1'-0"
SIM
2A3.1
2A3.1
REFSTRUCTURALT.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
T.O. BLADE FRAMING25' - 0"T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"
T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"
JOIST BEARING (BOH-HI)12' - 3"
REFSTRUCTURALT.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
B.O. HEADER11' - 6"JOSIT BEARING (FOH-HI)12' - 7"
T.O.PARAPET16' - 8"
FREEZER110 CREW114 HALLWAY109 DINING101
SERVICE104KITCHEN106 DINING101FREEZER110
4A3.3
7'-3"
2'-0"
7'-3"
4'-1"
7'-7"
4'-1"T.O. FRAMING14' - 4"
T.O. FRAMING14' - 4"T.O. FRAMING11' - 6"

BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.2
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 12:09 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\30 A3.1 Wall Sect.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 75 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 248 of 486 1A4.1
2A4.1 2A4.1
4A4.1 3A4.1
1SECTION3/4" = 1'-0"2SECTION3/4" = 1'-0"3SECTION3/4" = 1'-0"4SECTION3/4" = 1'-0"5SECTION3/4" = 1'-0" SIM
OPP.

OPP
5A4.1SIM
REF.STRUCTURAL
T.O. CONC. SLAB0'-0"
T.O. PARAPET16' - 8"T.O. PARAPET16' - 8"
B.O. HEADER11' - 6"
REF.STRUCTURAL
T.O. SLAB0'-0"
REF.STRUCTURAL
T.O. CONC. SLAB0'-0"T.O. CONC. SLAB0'-0"
REF.STRUCTURAL
JOIST BEARING (BOH-HI)12' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5" B.O. HEADER11' - 6"
T.O. DINING PARAPET16' - 8"
I-JOIST, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS
VAPOR RETARDERTYP2X6 FRAMING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

TILE, REF. FINISHPLAN & INTERIORELEVATIONS.

CONCRETE SLAB ONGRADE, REFSTRUCTURALDRAWINGS
STRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

WEATHER BARRIER
FLOOR FINISH, REF.FINISH PLAN.

CONC. SLAB ONGRADE, SEESTRUCT.

SINGLE PLYMEMBRANE ROOF

FIRE BLOCKINGAS REQUIRED

VAPOR RETARDERTYPWEATHER BARRIER
2X6 FRAMING, SEESTRUCT.STRUCTURALSHEATHING, SEESTRUCT.

WALL FINISH, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.

FLOOR FINISH, REF.FINISH PLAN.

STRUCTURAL ROOFSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

FINISH CEILING, REF.REFLECTED CEILINGPLANSFIRE BLOCKINGAS REQUIREDVAPOR RETARDERTYP1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHINGBATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULEWALL FINISH, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.2X6 FRAMING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.FLOOR FINISH, REF.FINISH PLAN.

CONCRETEFOOTING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS
I-JOIST, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS
LEDGER & HANGER,REF. STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

STRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.FIRE BLOCKINGAS REQUIRED WEATHER BARRIER2X6 FRAMING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.
1" INSUL.AL.STOREFRONT,SEE WINDOW SCH.

FLOOR FINISH,SEE FINISH PLAN.CONC. SLAB ON GRADE,SEE STRUCT. DWGS.

CONC.FOOTING,REF. STRUCT. DWGS

CONCRETE SLAB ONGRADE, REFSTRUCTURALDRAWINGSCONCRETE SLAB ONGRADE, REFSTRUCTURALDRAWINGS R-38 RIGIDROOFINSUL, SEEINSUL. SCH.

STRUCTURAL ROOFSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.FIRE BLOCKINGAS REQUIREDLEDGER, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. 1x4 WOOD TRIM,PAINTED. REF.INTERIORELEVATIONS
1/2" CEMENT BOARD
1/2" GYPSUM BOARD
CONC. FOOTING,REF. STRUCTURAL

SINGLE PLYMEMBRANE ROOF

VAPOR RETARDERTYP
1x4 WOOD TRIM,PAINTED. REF.INTERIORELEVATIONS
1" UNSUL.ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT, REF.WINDOW SCHEDULE
SINGLE PLYMEMBRANE ROOFR-38 RIGID ROOFINSULATION, REF.INSULATION SCHEDULESTRUCTURAL ROOFSHEATHING, SEESTRUCTURALDWGS.VAPOR RETARDER, TYP.I-JOIST, SEESTRUCT. DWGS.

STRUCTURAL ROOFSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.I-JOIST, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS R-38 RIGID ROOFINSULATION, REF.INSULATIONSCHEDULE R-38 RIGID ROOFINSULATION, REF.INSULATIONSCHEDULESTRUCTURAL ROOFSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. 6"MIN.
12'-6 3/4"
T.O. CURB0'-6"OPPT.O. CONC. CURB0'-6"
SIM
LED STRIP LIGHTING, REF.ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
LED STRIP LIGHTING, REF.ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
SECTION GENERAL NOTESA.SEAL ALL EXTERIOR WALL AND ROOF PENETRATIONS AND JOINTS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS TO ENSURE A COMPLETELY WEATHER-TIGHTSEAL. SEALANT LOCATIONS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO : LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTS, DOOR AND WINDOW FRAMES, FASCIA EDGES, SIGNAGEMOUNTS, CONDUIT PENETRATIONS, SCUPPERS, ELECTRICAL OUTLETS, HOSE BIBS, AND UTILITY SERVICE ENTRANCES. REFER TO JOINT TREATMENTSCHEDULE.B.PROVIDE CONTINUOUS WEATHER BARRIER BEHIND ALL EXTERIOR FINISHES. UTILIZE COMMERCIAL GRADE BUILDING WRAP. UTILIZE FLUID APPLIEDWEATHER BARRIER AT METAL SIDING, AND EIFS. LAP & TAPE ALL SEAMS. LAP OVER ALL FLASHING. COORDINATE TRANSITIONS PER MFR'SRECOMMENDATIONS. APPROVED ALTERNATE: PROVIDE FLUID APPLIED OR SELF ADHERING WEATHER BARRIER BEHIND ALL EXTERIOR FINISHES.C.EXTERIOR SIDEWALKS AND PAVING ARE SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. G.C. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING SCOPE OF WORK WITHOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND/OR CIVIL DRAWINGS.D.GRADES SHALL BE 2" MIN. BELOW FLOOR SLAB AND SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING @ 5% SLOPE EXCEPT @ PEDESTRIAN PATHS WHICH SHALLBE SLOPED AWAY FROM BUILDING @ 1/8" PER FOOT MIN. AND 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.E.REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLAN AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL FRAMING REQUIREMENTS.F.VAPOR RETARDER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONTINUOUS SHEETS FROM FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF DECK. ALL SEAMS AND PENETRATIONSSHALL BE SEALED PER MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTION. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS CLASS 1 OR CLASS 2 VAPOR RETARDER ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THEWALL FRAMING AND BEHIND APPLIED WALL FINISH SHEATHING IN ASHRAE ZONES MARINE 4 AND 5 THROUGH 8. LAP AND TAPE ALL SEAMS TOACHIEVE CONTINUOUS COVERAGE OVER THE ENTIRE UNFENESTRATED BUILDING ENVELOPE.G.INSULATION AND VAPOR RETARDER IN EXPOSED AREAS TO HAVE A FLAME SPREAD OF 25 AND A SMOKE DEVELOPMENT OF 450 OR BETTER.

CONC. FOOTING,REF. STRUCTURAL
LED TAPE LIGHTING,REF. ELECTRICALDRAWINGS

SPANDRAL GLASS
T.O. PARAPET14' - 4"
7A4.1SIM.10'-0"
14" PERFOOT
2X FRAME EXT. PLAST.

SPANDRAL GLASS
EXT. PLASTER
CONC.FOOTING,SEE STRUCT.CONC.FOOTING,SEE STRUCT
CONC. SLAB ON GRADE,SEE STRUCT. DWGS.

T.O. CONC. SLAB0'-0"
FINISH CEILING,REF. REFLECTEDCEILING PLANS1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHING SINGLE PLYMEMBRANE ROOF2X BRACING
VENT
R-38 RIGID ROOFINSUL, SEEINSUL. SCH.
2X BRACING
VENT
R-21 INSUL.

R-21 INSUL.

CANOPY UNDERSEPARATEPERMIT

STONE VENEERSTONE VENEER

SERVICE DOOR
2X FURR OUT
5A4.1
2A4.1
EXT. PLAST.

EXT. PLAST.
6A2.1 6A2.1

WALL SECTIONS
A3.3
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 12:11 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\30 A3.1 Wall Sect.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 76 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 249 of 486 T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
NOTE: PRE-FABRICATED CANOPY.DESIGN OF CANOPY AND CANOPYCONNECTION TO WALL BY CANOPYMANUFACTURER . COORDINATEBACK-WALL BLOCKING REQUIREMENTSWITH CANOPY MANUFACTURERREF. STRUCTURAL 10A4.3
MEMBRANE ROOFING.

LINE OF WALL BEYOND.SCHLUTER 'QUADEC' TRIM,REF. FINISH SCHEDULEALIGN STOREFRONT WITHFACE OF CONC. BELOW

PRE-FINISHED TWO-PIECEMETAL COMPRESSIONEDGE WITH DRIP EDGE STRUCTURAL SHEATHING,REF. STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

LED STRIP LIGHTING, REF.ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS

WEATHER BARRIER
CONTINUOUS JOINTSEALANT WITH BACKERROD,TYP.

WALL FINISH, REF. TOFINISH PLAN & INTERIORELEVATIONS.VAPOR RETARDER TYP BASE, REF. FINISH PLAN &INTERIOR ELEVATIONS.FLOOR FINISH, REF. TOFINISH PLAN. 2X6 FRAMING, REF. TOSTRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.STRUCTURAL SHEATHING,REF. STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.BATT INSULATION, REF.INSULATION SCHEDULESTONE VENEERCONC. CURB

FOOTINGGRADE
SERVICE DOOR1/2" ISOLATIONJOINT WITHSEALANT. REF.JOINT TREATMENTSCHEDULE.

PRE-FINISHEDTWO-PIECE METALCOMPRESSIONEDGE WITH DRIPEDGEBRAKE METAL,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONTEXT. PLASTERWEATHER BARRIERSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

ACM-5WEATHER BARRIER2X P.T. WOOD SILLPLATE OVER SILLSEALER. REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS FORANCHORINGREQUIREMENT.

METAL FLASHING
WALL FINISH, REF.TO FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.VAPOR RETARDERTYPBATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULETILE BASE, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.FLOOR FINISH, REF.TO FINISH PLAN.

VAPOR RETARDERTYP
STRUCT. SHEATHING,SEE STRUCT DWGS.
1/2" GYPSUM BOARD .

COUNTERFLASHING, EXTENDUP 4" BEHIND WALLFINISH

WEATHER BARRIER
2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE FLOOR FINISH, REF.TO FINISH PLAN.

ACM-1
TAPEREDINSULATION. SLOPE1/2" PER FOOTSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.WEATHER BARRIER2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

CONTINUOUSPRE-FINISHEDONE-PIECE METALCAP SET IN MASTIC,REF. FINISHSCHEDULEACM-12X8 FRAMING REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.WEATHER BARRIERWEATHER BARRIERTAPEACM-1 ACM-1 2X8 FRAMING REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.WEATHER BARRIERSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

PICK UP WINDOW,REF. SCHEDULESILL FLASHING W/END DAMS SET ONFULL BED OFSEALANT.STRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

ACMWEATHER BARRIER2x6 FRAMINGVAPOR RETARDER TYP
5 1/2" METAL STUDSOVER SILL SEALERREF. STRUCTURALDRAWINGSSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.WEATHER BARRIEREXT. PLAST.

WEEP SCREED
MINERAL WOOLINSULATION, REF.INSULATION SCHEDULEVAPOR RETARDERTYPTILE BASE, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.FLOOR FINISH, REF.TO FINISH PLAN.CONC. SLAB ONGRADE, SEESTRUCT.

STAINLESS STEELSURROUND
ACM-5COUNTER FLASHING

WEATHER BARRIER
CANOPY FLASHINGBY PREFABRICATEDCANOPYMFR./INSTALLER.

WEATHER BARRIERMETAL FLASHING
ACM-5SEALANT ANDBACKER RODMETAL FLASHING
2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULEVAPOR RETARDER STRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.AL. STOREFRONT,SEE.WINDOWSCH.

TILE BASE BEYOND,SEE FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.

WEATHER BARRIERTYP
COUNTERFLASHING, EXTENDUP 4" BEHIND WALLPANELSMEMBRANEFLASHING

BLOCKING ASREQUIRED
EXT. PLASTER
ALUMINUM STOREFRONTREF. WINDOW SCHEDULE
1/2" ISOLATIONJOINT WITHSEALANT. REF.JOINT TREATMENTSCHEDULE.

BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE

VAPOR RETARDER
CONC. SLAB ONGRADE, SEESTRUCT.
1/2" CEMENTBOARDTILE, REF. FINISHPLAN & INTERIORELEVATIONS

FINISH GRADE
ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT, REF.WINDOW SCHEDULECONTINUOUSSEALANT JOINTWITH BACKER RODWHERE REQUIRED,TYP.

VAPOR RETARDERTYPCONTINUOUSSEALANT JOINTWITH BACKER RODWHERE REQUIRED,TYP.

WEATHER BARRIER
2X P.T. WOOD SILL PLATEOVER SILL SEALER. REF.STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSFOR ANCHORINGREQUIREMENT.TWO-PIECEFLASHING ANDCOUNTER FLASHINGBY WIB MFR COLORTO MATCH COOLERROOF

CANOPY UNDERDEFERREDSUBMITTAL
WEATHER BARRIER.

PARGE COAT
BASE TILE, REF. FINISHSCHEDULE

SINGLE PLYMEMBRANE ROOF
LEDGER, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHINGVAPOR RETARDERTYPWALL FINISH, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIOR ELEVATIONS.STAINLESS STEELCORNER TRIM

RETURN FINISHTO STOREFRONT
CONT. 2x6 WOOD FRAMING

DRIP SCREED

EXTERIOR GRADESHEATHING

FLASHING
CONC. CURB,SEE CIVILDRAWINGS
HATCHED AREAINDICATES FIREBLOCKINGREQUIRED EVERY10'-0" MAX ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT, REF.WINDOW SCHEDULE
1/2" GYPSUM BOARDINSTALL SHEATHINGAS REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN FINISHALIGNMENTLVL. REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS RIGID ROOFINSULATION, REF.INSULATIONSCHEDULESTRUCTURAL ROOFSHEATHING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. 6"
4"
8"
1'-3 3/4"
1'-3 1/4"
6"
2"
4"7 3/4"
1"1 3/8"
SILL FLASHING W/ ENDDAMS SET ON FULL BEDOF SEALANT.PARGE COATFORMED CONC. CURB STAINLESSSTEELCORNERGUARD, (CP-8)
1SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"3SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0" 4SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
5SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
6SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
7SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
8NOT USED1 1/2" = 1'-0"
10SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
12SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
9SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
13SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
14SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
11SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
LINE OF WALL BEYOND.SCHLUTER 'QUADEC' TRIM,REF. FINISH SCHEDULEBASE TILE, REF. FINISHSCHEDULE (ALIGN WITHBASE BEYOND)1/2" CEMENT BOARD3/8" RIGID INSULATION 6"

FRP, STOP AT TOP OFINTERIOR SHEATHING

SEALANT
6" 6"
LSL LEDGER. REFSTRUCTURALDRAWINGS
1'-1 1/2"1'-4"2X SOLID FIRE STOPPING@ 20'-0" O.C.

CONT. 2x WOOD FRAMING
2X FRAMING
CONT. 2X4 FRAMING
2X10 @ 24" O.C.
3 1/2"11"
11 1/4"CONT. 2x6 WOOD FRAMINGNOTCH INTO 2X10FRAMINGSIMPSON HANGERS, REF.STRUCTURAL 2X8 FRAMING REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.VAPOR RETARDER

SPANDREL GLASS
3'-4"CONC. SLAB ONGRADE, SEESTRUCT.

CONC
P.T. WOODBLOCKING.

SINGLE PLYMEMBRANE ROOF
2SECTION DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
1/2" GYPSUM BOARDBEAM, REF. STRUCTURALDRAWINGSALUMINUM STOREFRONT,REF. WINDOW SCHEDULE LEDGER AND HANGER,REF. STRUCTURALDRAWINGSVAPOR RETARDER TYPBATT INSULATION, REF.INSULATION SCHEDULE2X6 FRAMING REFER TOSTRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FIRE BLOCKING ASREQUIREDSTRUCTURAL ROOFSHEATHING, REF. TOSTRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

P.T. WOOD BLOCKING,FULL DEPTH OFINSULATION.SINGLE PLY MEMBRANEROOFRIGID ROOF INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE CONCRETE SLABON GRADE.

T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"CONC. SLAB ONGRADE, SEESTRUCT.CONC. FOOTINGSEE STRUCT.

CONC. FOOTING, SEESTRUCT.

STONE VENEER
FLOOR FINISH, REF. TOFINISH PLAN.

LINE OF WALLBEYONDALIGN STOREFRONT WITHFACE OF CONC. BELOW ACM-1
2X P.T. WOOD SILLPLATE OVER SILLSEALER. REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS FORANCHORINGREQUIREMENT. "L" 4"x3"x1/4" (LLV) W/SIMPSON SDS25300,SCREWS 3/4" DOWN FROMTOP OF VERTICAL LEG 2X6 FRAMING,REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.2X10 TOP CAP
SEE 6/A2.1

SECTION DETAILS
A4.1
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 12:16 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\30 A4.1 Sections Dt.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 77 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 250 of 486 B
A
1PLAN DETAIL - BLADE1 1/2" = 1'-0"4PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"8PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"12PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0" 13PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
5NOT USED1 1/2" = 1'-0"
6NOT USED1 1/2" = 1'-0"
2PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
3PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"11PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
10PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"14PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
15PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
6 1/2"6 1/4"6 1/2"1 1/2"
9 1/4"
8"
8"
1'-3 3/4"
2"
R.O.
7PLAN DETAIL1 1/2" = 1'-0"
A
4 1/4"
R.O.R.O. R.O.

R.O.

R.O. R.O.

R.O.R.O.8"
R.O.
1"4"8"
1 3/8"
1 1
2"
7A4.1
1 "T" FLASHING,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT

CONTINUOUSSEALANT W/BACKER ROD ASREQ'
2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

WALL FINISH, REF.TO FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.VAPOR RETARDERBATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE EXT. PLAST.

WEATHER BARRIER2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHINGVAPOR RETARDERTYPWALL FINISH, REF. FINISH PLAN& INTERIOR ELEVATIONS.

COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.STAINLESS STEELCORNER TRIM CONTINUOUSSEALANT W/BACKER ROD ASREQUIRED. REFERTO JOINTTREATMENTSCHEDULEBRAKE METAL,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT CONTINUOUSSEALANT W/BACKER ROD ASREQUIRED. TYP. EACH SIDESREFER TO JOINT TREATMENTSCHEDULEALUMINUMSTOREFRONT REFERTO WINDOW SCHEDULE ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT REF.WINDOW SCHEDULEBRAKE METAL,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONTSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.WEATHER BARRIER

SHIMBRAKE METAL,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT
COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.VAPOR RETARDERTYP
1/2" CEMENT BOARDVAPOR RETARDERTYPBRAKE METAL,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONTALUMINUMSTOREFRONT, REF.WINDOW SCHEDULE CONTINUOUSSEALANT W/BACKER ROD ASREQUIRED. REFERTO JOINTTREATMENTSCHEDULE ACM
AL.STOREFRONT,REF. WINDOW SCH.CONTINUOUS SEALANT W/BACKER ROD ASREQUIRED. TYP. EACHSIDES REFER TO JOINTTREATMENT SCHEDULEWEATHER BARRIER ACM-1WEATHER BARRIERSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.2X8 FRAMING REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. 2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.2X8 FRAMING REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.ACMWEATHER BARRIER2x6 WOODBLOCKINGSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

TILE, REF. FINISHPLAN & INTERIORELEVATIONS.COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT, REF.WINDOW SCHEDULECONTINUOUSSEALANT W/BACKER ROD ASREQUIRED. TYP. EACH SIDEREFER TO JOINTTREATMENT SCHEDULE 5 1/2" METAL STUDSREF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS
CONTINUOUSSEALANT W/ BACKER RODAS REQUIRED. TYP. EACH SIDEREFER TO JOINT TREATMENTSCHEDULE 1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHINGWALL FINISH, REF.TO FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.VAPOR RETARDERTYPCOLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT, REF.WINDOW SCHEDULE
STAINLESS STEELCORNER PROTECTION(CP-8). GC TO PROVIDEAND INSTALL.CONTINUOUS SEALANT W/BACKER ROD AS REQUIRED.TYP. EACH SIDE. REFER TOJOINT TREATMENTSCHEDULE WALL FINISH, REF. TOFINISH PLAN & INTERIORELEVATIONS.1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING2X6 FRAMING, REF. TOSTRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.

WEATHER BARRIERACM
SHIMSTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.WEATHER BARRIERBRAKE METAL,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT, REF.WINDOW SCHEDULEFRP WITH CORNERTRIM AT JAMBS ANDSILLS STRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

CONTINUOUSSEALANT JOINTWITH BACKER RODWHERE REQUIRED,TYP. 1/2" CEMENT BOARD
1/2" CEMENT BOARD2X6 FRAMING AT 16"O.C.

COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

WEATHER BARRIER
EXT. PLASTER
1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHINGWALL FINISH, REF.TO FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.VAPOR RETARDERTYP2x6 WOODBLOCKING BATT INSULATION, REF.INSULATION SCHEDULESTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. 1/2" CEMENT BOARDVAPOR RETARDERTYP2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULESTRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.WEATHER BARRIEREXT. PLASTER PICK UP WINDOW,REF. SCHEDULE
AL. STOREFRONT,SEE WINDOW SCH.

EXT. PLASTWEATHER BARRIERBATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS. 1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHING
CONTINUOUS SEALANT W/BACKER ROD AS REQUIRED.TYP. EACH SIDE REFER TOJOINT TREATMENT SCHEDULEALUMINUM STOREFRONT,REF. WINDOW SCHEDULE CONTINUOUSSEALANT W/BACKER ROD ASREQUIRED. REFERTO JOINTTREATMENTSCHEDULEFLASHING PROVIDEDAND INSTALLED BYWIB MANUFACTURERP.T. WOOD BLOCKINGAS REQD. CONT.AROUND PERIMETER2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE TILE, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS.
1/2" CEMENT BOARD
TILE BASE, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS
2X FRAMINGBRAKE METAL,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT

SPANDREL GLASS
RETURN WOOD TRIM& TILE WAINSCOTBELOW TOSTOREFRONT, TYP.

WALL FINISH, REF.FINISH PLAN &INTERIORELEVATIONS
RETURN WOOD TRIM& TILE WAINSCOTBELOW TOSTOREFRONT, TYP.

HOLD DOWN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS
HOLD DOWN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS
HOLD DOWN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS
BASE, REF. FINISH PLAN &INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
TILE, REF. FINISHPLAN & INTERIORELEVATIONS.

COLUMN, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.
"T" FLASHING,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT
"T" FLASHING,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT

VAPOR RETARDERTYP
STRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.

INSTALL SHEATHINGAS REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN FINISHALIGNMENT

WEATHER BARRIER
BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE1/2" PLYWOODSHEATHINGACMWEATHER BARRIER"T" FLASHING,COLOR TO MATCHSTOREFRONT

WEATHER BARRIER
2"

BOLLARD

FRP WITH CORNERTRIM AT JAMBS ANDSILLS
STAINLESS STEEL CORNERPROTECTION (CP-8). GC TOPROVIDE AND INSTALL.

FRP WITH CORNER TRIMAT JAMB

FRP WITH CORNERTRIM AT JAMBS ANDSILLS

FRP WITH CORNERTRIM AT JAMB
BATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE
R.O.
7"
9NOT USED

PER PLAN
2"
EXT. PLASTER
STRUCTURALSHEATHING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.
2"

AIR GAP

AIR GAP
6"R.O.

WEATHER BARRIER2X6 FRAMING,SEE STRUCT.DWGS.
1/2" GYPSUM BOARDVAPOR RETARDERTYP1X4 WOOD TRIM,PAINTED. REF.INTERIORELEVATIONS.WEATHER BARRIERAL. STORE FRONT,SEE WINDOW SCH.

STRUCTURALSHEATHING,SEE STRUCTDWGS.WEATHERBARRIER

CAULK &BACKER RODSHIM
EXT. PLASTER
4" EXT. PLASTER
5'-1"
SEE FLOOR PLANBATT INSULATION,REF. INSULATIONSCHEDULE
2X6 FRAMING, REF.TO STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.
2X4 FURRING@ 16" O.C.
4"
12/22/2017 12:29:56 PM

PLAN DETAILS
A4.2
PLAN. DEPT. CHANGES05/15/23
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 12:27 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\40 A4.2 Plan Dt.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 78 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 251 of 486 PEX-11
2WEST ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
BEYOND
1NORTH ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
EQEQCL8"
6'-3"
M-4 M-5
PEX-11
SF-1
M-3ACM-1
FLUSH MOUNT WENDY'SSIGNAGE & WHITELETTERS TO BE PROV'DBY SIGN SUPPLIER. G.C.TO PROVIDE BLOCKINGAS REQ'D.

PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .
6'-3"
M-4
BLADE LIGHTING,SEE ELECT.3'-0"
JOINT, TYP.

M-5
T.O. BLADE FRAMING25' - 0"T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"LED STRIP LIGHTINGIN CORNICE WALL BEYOND,SEE BUILDINGSECT.

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
8'-10" TYP.
1'-4"
EQ.

M-4
PEX-11
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"ROOF LINEBEYONDSTO. REVEAL,TYP.

T.O. FRAMING11' - 6"

M-7ACM-5
PARGE COAT (GREY)@ CURB TYP.

EQ.

SPANDREL GLASS.
4"
4"
STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1
SPANDRELGLASS.

STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1PARGE COAT(GREY) @ ALLSLAB STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1 STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1WALL HYDRANT,REF. PLUMBINGSHEETS.

PEX-11
M-1 M-1
WINDOWS ARE TO HAVE REFLECTIVE LESSTHAN 15% AND TRANSPARENCY HIGHER THAN80% OPAQUE WINDOW ARE PROHIBITED.PLANNING NOTES T.O. BLADE23'-0"

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2.1
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 3:52 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\20 A2.1 Ext Elev.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 79 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 252 of 486 1EAST ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
M-1
M-4 M-7
BLADE BEYONDREVEAL, TYP.ROOF LINE
SERVICE DOOR,SEE DOOR SCH.PAINT PEX-1.GREASE AND CO2TANK CLOSET2SOUTH ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0" PRE-MANUFACTUREDCANOPY.

STO. REVEAL, TYP.

EQ.EQ.EQ. EQ.

STO. REVEAL,TYP.

ROOF LINE
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .
3'-3"M-5
M-5
SF-1 SF-1 SF-1
P.U.W., SEEWINDOW SCH.

EQ.EQ.

BLADE LIGHTING,SEE ELECT.

PEX-11LED TAPE LIGHTINGIN CORNICE
EQ.EQ.

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
M-1
BL-1
6'-3"
6'-3"
M-3
T.O. FRAMING21 - 5"
SPANDREL GLASS.

WALLPACK
ELECT. SWITCHGEAR
T.O. FRAMING14' - 4"
4"4"
EQ.EQ.
4"
M-5
STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1
STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1 STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1 STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1 STONE VENEERWAINSCOTST-1PARGE COAT(GREY) @SLAB, TYP.WALL HYDRANT,SEE PLUMBINGDWGS. SF-1 M-4PEX-11M-4T.O. FRAMING11' - 6"
PEX-11
M-4PEX-11M-4PEX-11
SF-1BL-1
PEX-11M-4
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .BEYONDM-5
PRE-MANUFACT'DCANOPY .BEYONDM-5#####LED ILLUMINATED BOX FORADDRESS NUMERS M-7ACM-5T.O. FRAMING16' - 9"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
PRE-MANUFACTUREDCANOPY.M-52X12 T.S @24" O.C
M-7ACM-5T.O. FRAMING16' - 9"
T.O. CONC. SLAB0' - 0"
M-52X12 T.S @24" O.C
NOTE: FOR EXTERIOR FINISHES SEE A6.2
WINDOWS ARE TO HAVE REFLECTIVE LESSTHAN 15% AND TRANSPARENCY HIGHER THAN80% OPAQUE WINDOW ARE PROHIBITED.PLANNING NOTES FLUSH-MOUNT WENDY'S SIGNAGE (WHITE LETTERS)PROVIDED BY SIGN SUPPLIER. G.C. TO PROVIDE BLOCK'GAS REQ'D.

P.U.W., SEE WINDOW SCH.

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2.2
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 4:03 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\20 A2.1 Ext Elev.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 80 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 253 of 486 1EAST ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"
EQEQCL
6'-3"
6'-3"6'-3"
M-7ACM-5ACM-5
PEX-11
M-7T.O. PARAPET FRAMING21' - 5"
B.O. CANOPY9' - 4"
STO. REVEAL,TYP.

EQ.

BLADE LIGHTING,SEE ELECT.

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
NOTE: FOR EXTERIOR FINISHES SEE A6.2
WINDOWS ARE TO HAVE REFLECTIVE LESSTHAN 15% AND TRANSPARENCY HIGHER THAN80% OPAQUE WINDOW ARE PROHIBITED.PLANNING NOTES 3'-0"
8'-10"
BL-1P.U.W., SEEWINDOW SCH.
2'-5"
P.U.W., SEEWINDOW SCH.WALL MOUNT'DLIGHT FIXTURE,TYP.SF-1 SF-1 ST-1STONE VENEERWAINSCOT
3'-0" H WALL W/ EXT.PLAST. PAINT PEX11WITH STONE CAP, TYP. D.T ELEVATIONWITH PORTE COCHERE A2.3
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
5/17/2023, 4:19 PM, Y:\Active Projects\Wendy's\Wendy's 2022\Cotti Foods\Indio\Drawings\20 A2.1 Ext Elev.dwg, kristin SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:

DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:

ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

Page 81 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 254 of 486

EVEVEVEVEV
77-899 WOLF RD.PH. (760) 777-9131FAX (760) 777-9132PALM DESERT, CALIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/2492211HERMANN INDIO, CAWENDY'S DRIVE THROUGHDESIGNGROUPSUITE 102 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANLS1

Page 82 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 255 of 486 Wendy’s
81703 Highway 111
Indio, California
Metal Store Front
SF-1
Wendy’s Grey
“Alpaca” SW- 7022
PEX-4
Sherwin Williams
“Mississippi Bronze”
PEX-1
Metal Panel
Aloca Reybond “Bright Red”
Alucobond “Red Fire Cool”
ACM-1 & M-3
Wendy’s Exterior Drive-thru Tower
Colorweld 300
“Stormy Gray”
ACM-5 & M-7
Wendy’s Tan
“Hopsack” SW-6109
PEX-11
Stone Veneer
El Dorado Stone
Rustic Ledge
“Sawtooth Blend”

Page 83 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 256 of 486 12 44
4 4
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBER
5/18/2023, 12:50 PM, P:\2022 Projects\22.ALTG.010 - Wendys Indio\04 DESIGN DRAWINGS\01 DWG\E1.0 - Electrical Site Plan.dwg, Gilbert.Leyva SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 04/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY: JPMCHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 engineering consultantsIndian Wells, CA 9221074770 Highway 111, Suite 203rtmec.com760.340.9005| PLAN. DEPT.CHANGE.05/15/23
E1.0ELECTRICAL SITELIGHTING PLAN
'SA''BA'
SHEET MATCHLINESEE SHEET E1.1

Page 84 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 257 of 486 234568791011PICK-UPWINDOWPICK-UPWINDOW
44 4
4 4
4 SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 04/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY: JPMCHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 engineering consultantsIndian Wells, CA 9221074770 Highway 111, Suite 203rtmec.com760.340.9005| PLAN. DEPT.CHANGE.05/15/23
E1.1ELECTRICAL SITELIGHTING PLAN
'SA'TYPICAL LIGHT DETAIL'BA'
SEE SHEET E1.0SHEET MATCHLINE

Page 85 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 258 of 486 12 44
4 4
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 04/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY: JPMCHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 engineering consultantsIndian Wells, CA 9221074770 Highway 111, Suite 203rtmec.com760.340.9005| PLAN. DEPT.CHANGE.05/15/23
E1.2ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
'SA'
StatisticsDescriptionSymbolAvgMaxMinMax/MinAvg/MinPARKING0.8 fc2.2 fc0.2 fc11.0:14.0:1 'BA'
SHEET MATCHLINESEE SHEET E1.3

Page 86 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 259 of 486 234568791011PICK-UPWINDOWPICK-UPWINDOW
44 4
4 4
4 SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 04/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY: JPMCHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 engineering consultantsIndian Wells, CA 9221074770 Highway 111, Suite 203rtmec.com760.340.9005| PLAN. DEPT.CHANGE.05/15/23
E1.3ELECTRICAL SITEPHOTOMETRIC PLAN
'BA'
SEE SHEET E1.2SHEET MATCHLINE
LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'SA' (MOUNT AT 15'-0" A.F.F.)
LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'BA' (MOUNT AT 8'-8" A.F.F.)
'SA'

Page 87 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 260 of 486 12 44
4 4
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 04/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY: JPMCHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 engineering consultantsIndian Wells, CA 9221074770 Highway 111, Suite 203rtmec.com760.340.9005| PLAN. DEPT.CHANGE.05/15/23
E1.4ELECTRICAL SITEPHOTOMETRIC PLAN
'SA'
SHEET MATCHLINESEE SHEET E1.5

Page 88 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 261 of 486 234568791011PICK-UPWINDOWPICK-UPWINDOW
44 4
4 4
SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBER
5/18/2023, 12:51 PM, P:\2022 Projects\22.ALTG.010 - Wendys Indio\04 DESIGN DRAWINGS\01 DWG\E1.0 - Electrical Site Plan.dwg, Gilbert.Leyva SITE NUMBER:BUILDING TYPE:OWNER:BASE VERSION:DRAWING RELEASE:PROJECT YEAR:ASSET TYPE:CLASSIFICATION:UPGRADE CLASSIFICATION:DESIGN TYPE:

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 04/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY: JPMCHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 engineering consultantsIndian Wells, CA 9221074770 Highway 111, Suite 203rtmec.com760.340.9005| PLAN. DEPT.CHANGE.05/15/23
'SA'
SEE SHEET E1.4SHEET MATCHLINE
E1.5ELECTRICAL SITEPHOTOMETRIC PLAN

Page 89 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 262 of 486 SEAL
DESCRIPTIONDATEREV.

PROJECT TYPE:
14035(2.0) SMART 65+FREESTANDINGNEWCOTTI FOODS2022NEW BUILD2022(2.0) UM BRIGHTSUMMER NEWSMART 65+
ISSUE DATE: 04/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER: -----DRAWN BY: JPMCHECKED BY: JD #1403581703 HIGHWAY 111INDIO, CA 92201
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE &ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS1330 OLYMPIC BLVD.SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 engineering consultantsIndian Wells, CA 9221074770 Highway 111, Suite 203rtmec.com760.340.9005| PLAN. DEPT.CHANGE.05/15/23
E1.6LIGHTING FIXTURECUTSHEETS
LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'SA' - 2872 LUMENS(MOUNT AT 15'-0" A.F.F.)LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE 'BA' - 1164 LUMENS(MOUNT AT 8'-8" A.F.F.)

Page 90 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 263 of 486 Wendy’s Indio
Sage Investco
Categorical Exemption No. 32
Lead Agency:

City of Indio
100 Civic Center Mall
Indio, California 92201
Prepared by:

Rich Malacoff, AICP and Anna Choudhuri
The Altum Group
44-600 Village Court, Suite 100
Palm Desert, CA 92260
November 2022

Page 91 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 264 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio i
Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ........................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Site Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 2 Consistency Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 9 Exceptions to the Exemption Analysis ............................................................................................ 15 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 17 References ...................................................................................................................................... 17 List of Tables
Table 1 Project Characteristics ...................................................................................................................... 2 Table 2 Existing Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 3 Table 3 Summary of VMT Impacts ............................................................................................................... 14 List of Exhibits
Figure 1 Regional Location .............................................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2 Project Location ................................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 3 Site Location ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 4 Site Photos ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 5 Site Plan ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Appendix
Appendix A - Traffic Impact Analysis
Appendix B - Noise Study
Appendix C - Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study Appendix D - Cultural Resource Investigation

Page 92 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 265 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 1
This report serves as the technical documentation of environmental analysis performed by The Altum Group Inc for the Wendy’s Indio Conditional Use Permit No.22-11-1007 and Design Review No. 22-12-518(project) in the City of Indio (City). The intent of the analysis is to document whether the project is eligible for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption (CE). The report therefore provides an introduction, project description and evaluation of the project; consistency with the requirements for a Class 32 exemption. This includes an analysis of the project’s potential impacts in the areas of cultural and historic resources, noise, traffic, and noise. The report concludes that the project is eligible for a Class 32 CE.

Introduction
The City of Indio proposes to adopt a Class 32 CE for a proposed project at 81703 Highway 111 in the City of Indio. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332 states that a CE is allowed when:
a. The project is consistent with th e applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b. The proposed development occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
c. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered or rare species. d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

Additionally, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 provides exceptions to a CE as follows:
a. Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a pro ject that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environmental may, in a particularly sensitive environmental, be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact environmental re sources of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law, by federal, state, or local agencies.
b. Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, is significant. c. Significant Effect . A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
d. Scenic Highways . A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.

This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted Negative Declaration (ND) or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). e. Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. f. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

Page 93 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 266 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 2
The Altum Group has evaluated the project’s consistency with the above requirements, including the potential impacts to traffic, air quality, noise, and cultural resources for a property located at 81703 Highway 111 in the City of Indio. The analysis in this document will confirm the project’s eligibility for the Class 32 exemption.

Project Description
The project site is located at 81703 Highway 111 in the City of Indio, Riverside County, California. The site includes one parcel identified as Assessor Parcel Number (APN). 616-1 01-003, that totals 0.96 acres. The site contains two structures and is part of a larger shopping center with existing on site parking spaces.

Figure 1 shows the location of the project site from a regional setting, while Figures 2 and 3 show the site’s location within the City and at the property address.

The proposed project is considered an infill project because the site is part of an overall shopping center which is consistent with zoning and all utility service is currently provided to the site.

The proposed project would involve development of a 3,068 square foot drive-thru restaurant that provide 37 parking spaces, on site landscaping, and outdoor seating as shown in Figure 4 which shows the Site Plan and Figure 5 which include some photographic reference to the project site and surrounding. The proposed building will occupy 3,068 square feet which is approximately 7.3 % of the site. There will be one ingress/ egress to the site, however there are various other entry points in the shopping center which would be available for patrons to use.

Construction would occur over approximately eight (8) months, with construction anticipated to begin in January of 2023 and be completed September of 2023. The excavated soils would be recompacted and redistributed on site. Therefore, the proposed project would have no import or export of soils nor associated haul trips for exported soils. The City will be required to process the project via a Conditional Use Permit and eventually obtain Building Permits.

Table 1 Project Characteristics
Existing Characteristics
Address 81703 Highway 111
Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 616-101-003
Lot Area 0.96 acres (41,818 SF)
Existing uses Vacant Office Building
Parking 37 Spaces
Existing Site Conditions
The project site is a generally flat, rectangular lot located at 81703 Highway 111 between Clinton Street/Dr.

Carreon and Granada Street as shown in the attached Site Plan in Figure 4. The attached photos show the existing building and surroun ding area. The parcel is in the Highway 111 Specific Plan and has a General Plan/Zoning Designation of Mixed-Use Neighborhood.

The project site is located in the City of Indio, California on the Highway 111 Corridor. Table 2 provides a summary of existing land uses in the immediate vicinity of the project site.

Page 94 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 267 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 3
Table 2 Existing Land Use
Location
Land Use
Existing Use
General Plan Designation
Zoning District Zoning Designation
Subject Property Vacant Office Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) Surrounding
Properties
North Vacant Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) South Retail Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) East Office, Retail Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) West Retail Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) (Source: City of Indio Unified Development Code and General Plan, 2022 and site visits)

Page 95 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 268 of 486 ExhibitRegional Location Map
Wendy's Drive-Thru Indio 1
1 in = 6.68 mi
Source: County of Riverside, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, Esri, CGIAR, USGS

Page 96 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 269 of 486 ExhibitVicinity Map
Via
Lom ita
La M es a St
Via las M esas
Clinton St
Doctor Car r eon Blvd
Fuchsia Ave
Gr een Ave
R
ajah
W
ay
111
Regal Indio
MetroMathis Brothers
Furniture
Sloan's
Pollo Loco
Indio High
School
Bison
C
ir
C
heyenne
Rd
Stets on Ct
Buffalo Tr l
Avenida Esm er alda
Avenida Blanca
P r im r os e A ve
Doctor Car r eon Blvd
Date Ave
D
aisy
St
M onr oe
S t
Dollar Tree
Harbor Freight
Tools
Bank of America
In-N-Out Burger
Indio Fashion
Mall
Dr Carreon Park
John F Kennedy
Memorial
Hospital
Reynaldo
Carreon
Academy
School
Wendy's Drive-Thru Indio 2
Source: Esri Community Maps Contributors, Loma Linda University, County of Riverside, California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA 1 in = 0.11 mi

Page 97 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 270 of 486 ExhibitProject Site Location
111
Granada D r
Granada Dr
Highway111
111
111
Granada Dr
Highway111
Wendy's Drive-Thru Indio 3
Source: Source: Esri, USDA FSA, Esri Community Maps Contributors, Loma Linda University, County of Riverside, California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community 1 in = 0.03 mi

Page 98 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 271 of 486 Exhibit
4 Site Photos
Wendy’s Drive-Thru Indio
Point 2
Facing North
Point 4
Facing East
Point 5
Facing Northwest
Point 7
Facing West
Point 8
Facing South
Point 9
Facing East
3 12
4 3
1 2
4

Page 99 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 272 of 486 Exhibit
5 Site Plan
Wendy’s Drive-Thru Indio
Point 2
Facing North
Point 4
Facing East
Point 5
Facing Northwest
Point 7
Facing West
Point 8
Facing South
Point 9
Facing East

Page 100 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 273 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 9
Consistency Analysis
Criterion (a)
The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

Permitted Uses
The project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning District of Mixed Use Neighborhood which would allows a mix of moderate to higher intensity neighborhood development of commercial and residential uses such as essential retail and service businesses along the main corridors such as Highway 111 which are described in Chapter 3 of Indio General Plan and Section 2.03 of the Indio Development Code. (City of Indio Unified Development Code and General Plan , 2022). The proposed drive thru restaurant is an essential use that will serve the residential area beyond the commercial uses on both sides of Highway 111 and will satisfy all applicable policies in the City’s General Plan and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance.

Criterions (b)
The proposed development occurs within cit y limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

The proposed project will be located in the City
of Indio on an area of 0.96 acres . The site is
currently paved, with two vacant office buildings
and associated parking. The sit e is part of an
overall shopping center called the “Town and
Country Center” and has retail uses and offices
on all sides except for a large swatch of open
area to the east which has been vacant since
1985 (Historic Aerials, November 2022) as
shown on the photo to the right. Highway 111
borders the site to the west. Based on the
evidence provided t he proposed project would
constitute an infil l development on the project
site and would therefore be cons istent with
criterion “b” of CEQA Guidelines Section 15332,
pertaining to Class 32 exemptions for infill
development projects.

Criterion (c)
The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.

The project site is currently developed with existing buildings and a parking lot. It is located in a primarily developed and commercial area in the city of Indio, and therefore lacks habitat that would be suitable for sensitive animal or plant species. Th ere is limited vegetation on site, with a few trees located in the existing parking lot in close proximity to the current buildings. The site therefore does not provide sufficient habitat for sensitive species due to the small lot size, lack of native vege tation, and urban context. The site therefore has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, and the project is consistent with criterion “c” of the CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, pertaining to Class 32 exemptions for infill development projects.

Source: Google Earth, 2022

Page 101 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 274 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 10
Criterion (d)
Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.

The following provides an analysis of the project’s potential effects with respect to:

A. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
Air Quality
MD Acoustics conducted an Air Quality, GHG and Energy Impact Study in August 2022 (included as Appendix B). The project site is located in the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

SCAQMD is re sponsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the basin. SCAQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments, is also responsible for developin g, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin. An AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a county or region designated as nonattainment of the federal and/or California ambient air quality standards. The term nonattainment area is used to refer to an air basin where one or more ambient air quality standards are exceeded.

Construction-Source Emissions
Project construction -source emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. For localized emissions, the project will not exceed applicable Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) established by the SCAQMD.

Project construction-source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).

As discussed herein, the project will comply with all applicable SCAQMD construction -source emission reduction rules and guidelines. Project construction source emissions would not cause or substantively contribute to violation of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

Established requirements addressing construction equipment operations, and construction material use, storage, and disposal requirements act to minimize odor impacts that may result from construction activities.

Moreover, construction-source odor emissions would be temporary, short - term, and intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial num bers of people. Potential construction-source odor impacts are therefore considered less than significant.

Operational-Source Emissions
The project operational -sourced emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. Project operational -source emissions would not result in or cause a significant localized air quality impact as discussed in the Operations -Related Local Air Quality Impacts section of this report. Additionally, project-related traffic will n ot cause or result in CO concentrations exceeding applicable state and/or federal standards (CO “hotspots). Project operational -source emissions would therefore not adversely affect sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the project.

Project operational-source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).

The project's emissions meet SCAQMD regional thresholds and will not result in a significant cumulative impact. The project does not propose any such uses or activit ies that would result in potentially significant

Page 102 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 275 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 11
operational-source odor impacts. Potential operational -source odor impacts are therefore considered less than significant.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Operational emissions occur over the life of the project. The operational emissions for the project are 244.09 metric tons of CO2e per year (see Table 13). Furthermore, as shown in Table 13, the project’s total emissions (with incorporation of construction related GHG emissions) would be 246.40 metric tons of CO2 e per year.

These emissions do not exceed the County of Riverside CAP Update and SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. Therefore, the project's GHG emissions are considered to be less than significant.

B. Noise
MD Acoustics conducted a Noise Study in July 2022 (included as Appendix C). MD Acoustics performed two baseline noise measurements at the proposed project site. The existing noise level ranges from 51 to 73 dBA, Leq, depending on the proximity to Highway 111 during operational hours (7 am to 10 pm). MD has provided updated noise projections based on the project design.

This study compares the project’s operational noise levels to two (2) different noise assessment scenarios: 1) Project only operational noise level projections, 2) Project plus ambient noise level projections.

Construction activities can produce vibration that may be felt by adjacent land uses. The construction of the proposed project would not require the use of equipment such as pile drivers, which are known to generate substantial construction vibration levels. The primary vibration source during construction may be from a bulldozer. A large bulldozer has a vibration impact of 0.089 inches per second peak particle velocity (PPV) at 25 feet which is perceptible but below any risk to architectural damage. At a distance of 40 f eet (distance structure from the property line), a large bulldozer would yield a worst -case 0.053 PPV (in/sec) which may be perceptible for short periods of time during grading along the eastern property line of the project site, but is below any threshold of damage. The impact would be less than significant.

Project only operational noise levels are anticipated to range from 25 to 41 dBA, Leq at the property lines of the project site. This is below the 70 dBA limit for commercial uses as specified in the City of Indio General Plan Noise Element. Project plus ambient noise level projections are anticipated to range between 55 to 74 dBA at adjacent commercial receptors. It should be noted that as traffic volumes continue to increase along Highway 111, traffic noise levels will increase within the project vicinity. As previously mentioned in Section 3.7, as a rule of thumb, traffic noise increases approximately 3 dBA every doubling of ADTs (e.g. 14,000 to 28,000).

Therefore, ambient noise levels will further i ncrease (regardless of the proposed project) as traffic increases.

Project-generated noise levels will further be masked by traffic noise along the subject roadways.

The project as designed (see project design features in Section 7.2 of the report) meets the City’s noise ordinance and policies within the General Plan Noise Element. Therefore, the project's Noise impacts are considered to be less than significant, and no noise mitigation measures are required.

C. Traffic
The following analysis of potential traffic impacts from the proposed project is based on the Wendy’s Restaurant Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis completed by Integrated Engineering Group in August 2022 (included as Appendix A).

Page 103 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 276 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 12
Analysis Methodology
The Guidelines adopted by Riverside County require a 5-step process1 for VMT analysis:

1. Project Screening: Identifies if the project needs additional VMT analysis based on if the project meets screening criteria set by Riverside County. Projects that meet any criteria would have a presumption of less than significance.

2. Identify VMT Measure: If the project does not meet any screening criteria, the project will need to identify the appropriate VMT metric as identified in the Guidelines based on land use type.

3. Identify VMT Threshold: Based on the required VMT Measure the project will need to identify the appropriate VMT Measure threshold as required in the Guidelines.

4. Assessment of Impact: Project will need to evaluate its project specific VMT Measure against t he appropriate VMT Threshold to determine if the project would have an CEQA transportation VMT impact.

5. Mitigation Measures: If the project would have a VMT impact under CEQA the project would need to mitigate the impact to the extent feasible and disclose whether the project would fully mitigate its impact or require additional analysis.

Screening Criteria
County of Riverside Transportation Analysis Guidelines Screening Criteria The Guidelines recognize that certain projects based on type, location, size and other contexts could lead to a presumption of less than significance (i.e. the project’s VMT would not cause a transportation impact) and would not need additional VMT analysis. The Guidelines provide the following screening criteria2:

1. Small Projects: This applies to projects with low trip generation per existing CEQA exemptions or based on the County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Screening Tables, result in a 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e) per year screening level threshold.”

2. Projects Near High Quality Transit : High quality transit provides a viable option for many to replace automobile trips with transit trips resulting in an overall reduction in VMT.

3. Local Retail : The introduction of new Local -serving retail has been determined to reduce VMT by shortening trips that will occur.

4. Affordable Housing: Lower -income residents make fewer trips on average, resulting in lower VMT overall.

5. Local Essential Service : As with Local -Serving Retail, the introduction of new Local Essential services shortens non-discretionary trips by putting those goods and services closer to residents.

6. Map-Based Screening: This method eliminates the need for complex analyses by allowing existing VMT data to serve as a basis for the screening smaller developments. Note that screening is limited to residential and office projects.

7. Redevelopment Projects : Projects with lower VMT than existing on -site uses, can under limited circumstances, be p resumed to have a non -significant impact. In the event this screening does not apply, projects should be analyzed as though there is no existing uses on site (project analysis cannot take credit for existing VMT).

1 Guidelines, Figure 2 VMT Analysis Flow Chart
2 Guidelines, Figure 3 Screening Criteria for Development Projects

Page 104 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 277 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 13
VMT Analysis
Projects that do not meet any of the screening criteria identified would need to perform a VMT analysis per the Guidelines. The project would need evaluate the appropriate VMT metrics and compare them to thresholds to determine significance as defined by the Guidelines3.

VMT Measures
The Guidelines assign the appropriate VMT Measure for land use projects based on land use type. Residential and Office uses are required to use the relevant VMT efficiency metric, VMT per Capita or Work VMT per Employee respectively. Retail and s imilar uses are required to use a total VMT metric to measure the net change in VMT a project would create due to the “customer component” of the project.

VMT Thresholds
Once a project identifies the appropriate VMT measures for the proposed land uses it would need to be compared to thresholds for those metrics to determine significance under CEQA. The County has chosen to base its thresholds on the county and county -wide averages. The thresholds 4 as defined by the Guidelines provides are as follows:

• Residential Projects: exceeding 15.2 VMT/Capita, based on the county-wide average. • Office and Other Employment Projects: exceeding 14.2 Work VMT/Employee, based on the county - wide average.
• Retail and Other Customer Projects: An increase in total region wide (county) VMT.

Project Analysis
The project is primarily a retail project consisting of a fast-food restaurant.

Retail Use Assessment
Screening Criteria Assessment
The project is proposing the construction of 3,068 square foot fast -food restaurant with drive through along Highway 111 just east of Clinton Street in the City of Indio.

Screening Criteria Local-Serving Retail
The proposed retail would not only serve the other uses on the site but the local community as well. The guidelines state that to be considered local retail, no single store on-site exceeds 50,000 square feet. As stated previously, the entire project site provides approximately 3,068 square feet fast -food restaur ant that is considered local retail; therefore, the project could qualify for the Local-Serving Retail screening.

VMT Analysis
As shown in Table 1, the project’s retail component would qualify for screening for being a small project. For this reason, the project’s retail component would be presumed to be less than significant for VMT impacts.

3 Guidelines, Figure 4 Threshold Basisskjf
4 Guidelines, Figure 6 VMT Threshold of Significance

Page 105 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 278 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 14
VMT Impact Assessment and Conclusion
The proposed project is presumed to be less than significant for VMT impacts due to the proposed uses meeting at least one of the County’s screening criteria outlined in Section 2.1. The project’s VMT impact assessment for the proposed uses is summarized in Table 1:

Table 3 Summary of VMT Impacts
Land Use
Type Proposed Uses Impact Commentary
Retail 3,068 SF Fast-Food
Restaurant
Presumed to be less than
significant
Meets County’s Screening Criteria for
Local-Serving Retail.

D. Water Quality
The Site is currently served by Indio Water Authority and will continue to be served by that Agency who monitors all water quality. All disposal of waste will done so in accordance with State Law or County Ordinance so there will be no impact to water quality and the impacts are considered to be less than significant.

Criterion (e)
The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The proposed project would be located on a currently developed site that has been utilized with office buildings. Therefore, the site has existing utility and public services and the project would be adequately served by such services. Implementation of th e project would not substantially increase the demand for utilities or services to the project site. The following Utilities are provided to the Site:
• Indio Water Authority for Water Service
• Valley Sanitation District for Sewer
• Imperial Irrigation District for Electricity
• Southern California Gas for Gas
• Burrtec Waste Management Services
• Frontier Communications for Phone
• Spectrum for Cable Television
Since these providers already provide existing services to the site and project area, the project would be consistent with criterion “e” of the CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 pertaining to Class 32 exemptions for infill development projects.

Page 106 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 279 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 15
Exceptions to the Exemption Analysis
Criterion (a)
Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by considerat ion of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environmental may, in a particularly sensitive environmental, be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, exc ept where the project may impact environmental resources of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law, by federal, state, or local agencies.

This exception only applies to Class 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 categorical exemptions, The project is an infill development project, consistent with a Class 32 Categorical Exemption . Therefore, exemption criterion “a” does not apply to the project.

Criterion (b)
All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable wh en the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, is significant.

The drive-thru facility is replacing two medical buildings and the difference in the cumulative impact between the two uses is negligible. Therefore, exemption criterion “b” does not apply to the project.

Criterion (c)
A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

As described in Section XX: Existing Site Conditions, above, the project site is flat, paved, with two existing buildings, and is located in an urbanized area. The site has been in use as an office since approximately 1974 and prior to that it was agricultural (Source: Historic Aerials, November 2022) . The site is developed a nd therefore has no value as a habitat area for endangered, rare, or threatened species due to its small lot area, lack of native vegetation, and urban context. The project site does not contain any scenic resources, nor has it been classified as a site for cultural resources. There are no unusual circumstances that would cause significant environmental impacts due to the proposed project. Therefore, exception criterion “c” does not apply to the project.

Criterion (d)
A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted Negative Declaration (ND) or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

The project site is located approximately three (3) miles to the south of Interstate 10 (I-10) and 1.6 miles to the south of State Route 86 (SR-86). None of these are designated as a scenic highway (Caltrans 2018). The project site is relatively flat and located in an urbanized commercial area of the City. Therefore, the exception criterion “d” would not apply to the project.

Criterion (e)

Page 107 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 280 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 16
Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

The project site is not located as a hazardous waste site according to the Envirostor and Geotracker databases (DTCS 2019; SWRCB 2015). There are no hazardous waste sites within a 1000 feet radius of the proj ect site.

Therefore, exception criterion “e” does not apply to the project.

Criterion (f)
Historical Resources . A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

A Cultural Resources Study was performed by Paleo West in August of 2022 (included as Appendix D). The study conducted an analysis of the grounds and the building. The Study Concluded there were no subterranean resources on the site due to the fact that it had been used for agriculture and contained structures since 1974.

The two structures fail to meet any historic significance based on the following:
• CRHR Criterion 1 is for association with events that have made a significant cont ribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage. The building is one of many commercial/ office buildings constructed.

Neither building has been associated with any significant events in California or Indio’s history. The Bank of Indio was the first independent Bank in the City Indio, however there is no documentation that the bank was part of any historic event in the City, County, or State. Therefore, this criterion has not been satisfied.

• CRHR Criterion 2 is for any direct associations with the productive lives of persons important in local, state, or national history.

None of the owners or tenants have met the criteria for persons important to local, state, or national history. Therefore, this criterion has not been satisfied. • CRHR Criterion 3 is for embodying the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, and method of construction, or as the work of an important creative individual, or as having high artistic value.

The Spanish Revival style architecture is common and unremarkable, holds no distinction for a method of construction, or associated with a noted architect. Therefore, this criterion has not been satisfied. • CRHR Criterion 4: 81703 CA -111 does not meet CRHR Criterion 4 since it is unlikely to yield information important to prehistory or history
According to the Study attached as Appendix D the building and property have no significance to history or prehistory based on research and coordination with the Indian Tribes. Therefore, this criterion has not been satisfied.

Page 108 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 281 of 486 Categorical Exemption
Wendy’s Indio 17
Summary
Based on this analysis, the proposed Wendy’s Drive -Thru Project meets all criteria for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section §15332. There are no exceptions, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section §15300.2, to the Class 32 Categorical Exemption that apply to the project.

References
Documents:

City of Indio Unified Development Code and General Plan, October 2022.

Integrated Engineering Group (IEG), August 2022. Traffic Impact Study

MD Acoustics, August 2022. Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study.

MD Acoustics, August 2022. Noise Impact Study.

Web Sites:

California State Scenic Highway System Map .https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer. Accessed November 2022
California State Water Resources Control Board. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/. Accessed November 2022 California State Department of Toxic Substances Contro l. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/. Accessed November 2022
Department of Toxic Substances Control Enivrostor https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/. Accessed November 2022
Google Earth Pro. https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. Accessed November 2022

Page 109 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 282 of 486

Appendix A
Traffic Impact Analysis, IEG

Page 110 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 283 of 486

Prepared for:

The Altum Group
44-600 Village Court, Suite 100
Palm Desert CA, 92260

Prepared by:

23905 Clinton Keith Road 114-280
Wildomar, CA 92595

August 2022
Wendy’s Restaurant
Traffic Impact Study

Page 111 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 284 of 486

Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Executive Summary
i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Purpose of the Report
The purpose of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) report is to identify and document potential traffic operation deficiencies related to the proposed Wendy’s Restaurant Project in the City of Indio. This technical report will also recommend transportation mitigation measures and improvements to address potential project related impacts to local and regional transportation facilities.

Project Overview
The project is proposing the construction of a 3,068 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive through along Highway 111 just east of Clinton Street in the City of Indio. Access will be provided via an existing driveway on California Highway 111.

The project trip generation was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (1 1th Edition). It is estimated that the project will generate 645 total daily trips, 68 AM peak hour trips and 46 PM peak hour trips. Project trip distribution and assignment wer e developed, in coordination with City staff, based on the land use characteristics of the proposed project and surrounding area, existing travel patterns within the study are and anticipated travel patterns to and from the project site. Project scenarios and study area were then established in coordination with City staff to determine the potential project impact s on the transportation network. Refer to Appendix A for approved scoping agreement.

Project Scenarios:
• Existing Conditions (Year 2022)
• Existing with Project Conditions
• Opening Year Conditions plus ambient growth (Year 2023) • Opening Year with Project Conditions

Study Area Intersections:

1. CA Highway 111 & Clinton Street/Dr. Carreon Boulevard

2. CA Highway 111 & Las Palmas Road

Analysis Results and Recommendations

Existing Conditions (Year 2022)
All intersections operate at an acceptable LOS under Existing Conditions . The proposed project would not have a significant project related traffic impact under Existing with Project Conditions.

Opening Year Conditions (Year 2023)
All intersections would operate at an acceptable LOS under Opening Year Conditions . The proposed project would not have a significant project related traffic impact under Opening Year with Project Conditions

Page 112 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 285 of 486

Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Table of Content
i

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... I Purpose of the Report ..................................................................................................................................... i Project Overview ............................................................................................................................................. i Analysis Results and Recommendations ......................................................................................................... i

1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT ............................................................................................................. 2 PROJECT ACCESS ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 PARKING ............................................................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 METHODOLOGIES ....................................................................................................................................... 6 STUDY SCENARIOS ................................................................................................................................................... 6 STUDY TIME PERIODS ............................................................................................................................................... 6 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Intersection Capacity Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 7 Signalized Intersections ............................................................................................................................. 7 Analysis of Significance .............................................................................................................................. 9

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (2022) ...................................................................................................................... 10 ROADWAY NETWORK ............................................................................................................................................. 10 TRANSIT NETWORK ................................................................................................................................................ 10 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK ......................................................................................................................... 10 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................................................................................ 10 ANALYSIS RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................ 10 SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ......................................................................................... 11

4.0 OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS (2023) .............................................................................................................. 17 ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ......................................................................................... 17

List of Figures
FIGURE 1-1 – PROJECT SITE PLAN .................................................................................................................................. 3 FIGURE 1-2 – PROJECT STUDY AREA AND TRIP DISTRIBUTION .............................................................................................. 4 FIGURE 1-3 – PROJECT AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .................................................................................................... 5 FIGURE 3-1 – CITY OF INDIO CIRCULATION PLAN ............................................................................................................. 12 FIGURE 3-2 – CITY OF INDIO PUBLIC TRANSIT NETWORK .................................................................................................. 13 FIGURE 3-3 – CITY OF INDIO GENERAL BICYCLE NETWORK ................................................................................................ 14 FIGURE 3-4 – EXISTING YEAR (2022) AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ............................................................................... 15 FIGURE 3-5 – EXISTING YEAR (2022) WITH PROJECT AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................................... 16 FIGURE 4-1 – OPENING YEAR (2023) AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .............................................................................. 18 FIGURE 4-2 – OPENING YEAR (2023) WITH PROJECT AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ......................................................... 19

Page 113 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 286 of 486

Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Table of Content
ii
List of Tables
TABLE 1-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATE ................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE 1-2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ........................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE 2-1 VEHICULAR LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 7 TABLE 2-2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE HCM OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS METHOD .............................................. 8 TABLE 2-3 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR STOP CONTROLLED UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS .................................................. 9 TABLE 2-4 CITY OF INDIO SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA .............................................................................................................. 9 TABLE 3-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS (2022) INTERSECTION OPERATION ANALYSIS ................................................................... 11 TABLE 4-1 OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS (2023) INTERSECTION OPERATION ANALYSIS............................................................ 17

Appendices

APPENDIX A - SCOPING AGREEMENT

APPENDIX B - TRAFFIC COUNT DATA

APPENDIX C - EXISTING CONDITIONS PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

APPENDIX D - EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX E - OPENING YEAR (2023) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX F - OPENING YEAR (2023) WITH PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 114 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 287 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Project Introduction

1 1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION

This traffic impact analysis (TIA) report has been prepared for the Wendy’s Restaurant Project. The proposed project is located on Highway 111 just east of Clinton Street in the City Indio in the City of Indio, on an existing site that will be accessed via California Highway 111.

The project trip generation was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (1 1th Edition). It is estimated that the project will generate 645 total daily trips, 68 AM peak hour trips and 46 PM peak hour trips . Project trip distribution and assignment were developed, in coordination with City staff, based on the land use characteristics of the proposed project and surrounding ar ea, existing travel patterns within the study area and anticipated travel patterns to and from the project site. Project scenarios and study area were then established in coordination with City staff to determine the potential project impacts on the transp ortation network. Refer to Appendix A for approved scoping agreement.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The project is proposing the construction of a 3,068 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive through. Figure 1-1 shows the project site plan.

STUDY AREA
The study area for this project includes those locations that are expected to be affected by this project. The study area intersections were selected consistent with the City of Indio and Riverside County TIA Preparation Guide . IEG prepared a project traffic study scoping agreement defining the study area, which was reviewed and approved by Cit y staff prior to the preparation of this technical report. Refer to Appendix A for approved scoping agreement.

Figure 1-2 presents the study area that includes the following key intersections:

Study Area Intersections:

1. CA Highway 111 & Clinton Street/Dr. Carreon Boulevard

2. CA Highway 111 & Las Palmas Road

Turning movement counts were conducted for one weekday during the morning and evening peak hours. The turning movement counts will be utilized in Synchro software to determine LOS at all study intersections.

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
The trip generation is a measure or forecast of the number of trips that begin or end at the project site. These trips will result in some traffic increases on the streets where they occur. The rates used in this analysis were determined using Trip Generation, 11th Edition, published by ITE that is widely used in Southern California. Project ITE average trip generation rates are presented in Table 1-1.

Page 115 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 288 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Project Introduction

2 Table 1-1
Project Trip Generation Rate

Land Use1 Units2 ITE LU
Code
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-through Window TSF 934 22.75 21.86 44.61 17.18 15.85 33.03 467.48 1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2TSF = Thousand Square Feet

Table 1-2 summarizes the calculated trip generation based on the floor area associated with the proposed Project. As shown on Table 1-2, the proposed development is anticipated to generate approximately 645 total daily trips, 68 AM peak hour trips and 46 PM peak hour trips.

Table 1-2
Project Trip Generation

Land Use1 Intensity Units2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-through Window 3.07 TSF 70 67 137 53 49 102 1,434 Pass-by Reduction (50% - AM Peak Hour, 55% - PM
Peak Hour)3

35 34 69 29 27 56 789
Total 35 33 68 24 22 46 645
1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 Pass-by reduction percentage is based on the ITE methodology per 2021 Pass-By Tables for ITE Trip Generation Appendices.

PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Trip distribution and assignment is the process of identifying the probable destinations, directions and traffic routes that project related traffic will affect. Trip distribution and assignment information can be estimated from observed traffic patterns, experience or through use of a computerized travel forecast model. Once the proposed development’s trips have been estimated, they are assigned to the study area network. For this development, the project trip distribution and assignment were developed, in coordination with City staff, based on the land use characteristics of the proposed project and surrounding area, existing travel patterns within the study area, anticipated travel patterns to and from the project site.

Figures 1 -1 through 1 -3 show project site plan, study area , trip distribution /assignment including intersection turning movement volumes.

PROJECT ACCESS
Main access to the proposed project site will be provided via driveway along California Highway 111.

PARKING
The proposed development will be required to provide on -site parking spaces consistent with City of Indio parking requirement.

Page 116 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 289 of 486 ENGINEERING | PLANNING | SURVEY | ENVIRONMENTAL44-600 Village Court, Suite 100Palm Desert, CA 92260t.760.346.4750 f. 760.340.0089TheAltumGroup.com

Page 117 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 290 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant
Project Study Area and Trip Distribution
Figure 1-2
# IntersectionLEGEND

PROJECT SITE
2 1
25%
15%
10%
40%
10%10%
4

Page 118 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 291 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
Project AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
Figure 1-3
5

Page 119 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 292 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Methodologies
6 2.0 METHODOLOGIES
This section documents the methodologies and assumptions used to conduct the circulation impact analysis for the proposed project. This section contains the following background information:
• Study scenarios
• Study time periods
• Analysis methodologies
Refer to Appendix A for approved scoping agreement.

STUDY SCENARIOS
This report presents an analysis of the intersection operating conditions during the peak periods, which were selected in consultation with City staff for the following anticipated timeframe scenarios:
• Existing Conditions (Year 2022)
• Existing with Project Conditions
• Opening Year (Existing plus ambient growth) q Conditions (Year 2023) • Opening Year with Project Conditions

STUDY TIME PERIODS
The City selected the following peak hours for analysis:
• Weekday AM (peak hour between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM)
• Weekday PM (peak hour between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM)

ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES
Street system operating conditions are typically described in terms of “level of service.” Level of service is a report-card scale used to indicate the quality of traffic flow on roadway segments and at intersections. Level of service (LOS) ranges from LOS A (free flow, little congestion) to LOS F (forced flow, extreme congestion). Table 2-1 describes generalized definitions of auto LOS A through F.

Page 120 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 293 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Methodologies
7 Table 2-1 Vehicular Level of Service Definitions
LOS Characteristics
A
Primarily free-flow operation. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Controlled delay at the boundary intersections is minimal. The travel speed exceeds 80% of the base free-flow speed, and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0.

B
Reasonably unimpeded operation. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and control delay at the boundary intersections is not significant. The travel speed is between 67% and 80% of the base free-flow speed, and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0.

C
Stable operation. The ability to maneuver and change lanes at mid -segment locations may be more restricted than at LOS B. Longer queues at the boundary intersections may contribute to lower travel speeds. The travel speed is between 50% and 67% of the base free -flow speed, and the volume -to-capacity ratio is no greater than

1.0. D
Less stable condition in which s mall increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. This operation may be due to adverse signal progression, high volume, or inappropriate signal timing at the boundary intersections. The travel speed is between 40% and 50% of the base free-flow speed, and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0.

E
Unstable operation and significant delay. Such operations may be due to some combination of adverse signal progression, high volume, and inappropriate si gnal timing at the boundary intersections. The travel speed is between 30% and 40% of the base free-flow speed, and the volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0.

F
Flow at extremely low speed. Congestion is likely occurring at the boundary intersections, as indicated by high delay and extensive queuing. The travel speed is 30% or less of the base free -flow speed, or the volume -to- capacity ratio is greater than 1.0.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board (2016) Intersection Capacity Analysis
The analysis of peak hour intersection performance was conducted using the Synchro software program, which uses methodologies defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition to calculate LOS. Level of service (LOS) for intersection s is determined by control delay. Control delay is defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue to the time the vehicle departs from the stop line. The total elapsed time includes the time required for the vehicle to t ravel from the last -in-queue position to the first -in-queue position, including deceleration of vehicles from free-flow speed to the speed of vehicles in the queue.

Signalized Intersections
The HCM analysis methodology for evaluating signalized intersections is based on the “operational analysis” procedure. This technique uses 1,900 passenger cars per hour of green per lane (pcphgpl) as the maximum saturation flow of a single lane at an intersection. Average control delay is calculated by takin g a volume -weighted average of all the delays for all vehicles entering the intersection. Table 2-2 summarizes the level of service criteria for signalized intersections.

Page 121 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 294 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Methodologies
8 Table 2-2 Signalized Intersection Level of Service HCM Operational Analysis Method Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board (2016) All-way Stop-controlled (AWSC) Intersections
The HCM analysis methodology for evaluating all -way Stop-controlled intersections is based on the degree of conflict for each independent approach created by the opposing approach and each conflicting approach. Level of Service for AWSC intersections is also based on the average control delay. However, AWSC intersections have different threshold values than those applied to sign alized intersections. This is based on the rationale that drivers expect AWSC intersections to carry lower traffic volumes than at signalized intersections. Therefore, a higher level of delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same LOS.

Two-way Stop-controlled (TWSC) Intersections
The HCM analysis methodology for evaluating two -way Stop -controlled (TWSC) intersections is based on gap acceptance and conflicting traffic for vehicles stopped on the minor -street approaches. The critical gap (m inimum gap that would be acceptable) is defined as the minimum time interval in the major -street traffic stream that allows intersection entry for one minor -street vehicle. Average control delay and LOS for the “worst approach” are reported. Level of ser vice is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Table 2 -3 summarizes the level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections.

Average Control Delay
Per Vehicle (seconds) Level of Service (LOS) Characteristics <10.0
LOS A occurs when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable, or the cycle length is very short. If it is due to favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping.

10.1 – 20.0 LOS B occurs when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable, or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A.

20.1 – 35.0
LOS C occurs when progression is favorable, or the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping.

35.1 – 55.0 LOS D occurs when the volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective, or the cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.

55.1 – 80.0 LOS E occurs when the volume-to-capacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >80.0 LOS F occurs when the volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue.

Page 122 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 295 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Methodologies
9 Table 2-3 Level of Service Criteria for Stop Controlled Unsignalized Intersections Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Level of Service (LOS)
0-10 A
> 10 – 15 B
> 15 – 25 C
> 25 – 35 D
> 35 – 50 E
> 50 F
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board (2016) Analysis of Significance
Traffic impacts are identified if the proposed project will result in a significant change in traffic conditions on a roadway or intersection. A significant impact is normally defined when project related traffic would cause level of service to deteriorate to below the minimum acceptable level by a measurable amount. Impacts may also be significant if the location is already below the minimum acceptable level and project related traffic causes a further decline.

Table 2-4 City of Indio Significance Criteria
Level of Service
With Project
Allowable Change due to Project Impact
Roadway Segments Intersections
V/C Delay (sec.)
LOS E 0.02 2
LOS F 0.01 1
The City of Indio significance thresholds will be applied at study area intersections for the purposes of determining project-related impacts.

Page 123 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 296 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Existing Conditions (2022)
10 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (2022)
This section documents the circulation system conditions within the study area of the project under the existing without and with project scenarios . The Existing Conditions (20 22) without project traffic volumes is analyzed using existing volumes counts. Project traffic volumes are then added to Existing Conditions traffic volumes to develop the Existing with Project traffic volumes. This section also documents potential project related traffic impacts on the existing local and regional circulation networks. No network improvements are assumed under Existing Conditions scenarios.

ROADWAY NETWORK
Highway 111
Highway 111 provides a major east‐west connection from Indio to neighboring cities, the I‐10 and numerous commercial/retail and office uses. Highway 111 is a six‐lane with a painted median between Madison Street to Monroe Street and a posted speed of 45 MPH. East of Monroe Street to the eastern terminus at Indio Boulevard, the median alternates between a raised median and center left‐turn lane with a speed limit of 35 MPH.

Figure 3-1 shows City of Indio Circulation Plan

TRANSIT NETWORK
Sunline Transit is the main transit agency servicing the City of Indio and other cities in the region .

Sunline Transit currently operates a variety of bus routes within the vicinity of the project site . Bus routes 80, 81 and 111 currently service the study area of the proposed project.

Figure 3-2 shows City of Indio Public Transit Network.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Pedestrian facilities are provided within the Project study area including sidewalks and pedestrian crosswalks at signalized intersections . No existing or proposed bicycle facilities are provided along the property frontage on California Highway 111.

Figure 3-3 shows City of Indio General Bicycle Network.

TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The intersection turning movement counts were conducted during the weekday morning peak period from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and during the weekday evening peak period from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM on July 2, 2022. Traffic count data is provided in Appendix B.

ANALYSIS RESULTS
Table 3-1 shows Existing Conditions intersection operation analysis results.

Figures 3-4 and 3-5 show Existing Conditions intersection turning movement volumes.

Page 124 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 297 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Existing Conditions (2022)
11 Table 3-1
Existing Conditions (2022) Intersection Operation Analysis Intersection Existing Without Project Existing With Project Impact? Delay (a) LOS (b) Delay (a) LOS (b)
AM/PM Peak Hour

1. CA Highway 111 & Clinton
Street/Dr. Carreon Boulevard 20.1/22.5 C/C 20.2/22.6 C/C N/N

2. CA Highway 111 & Las Palmas Road 11.7/13.0 B/B 11.7/13.0 B/B N/N Notes:
(a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. At unsignalized intersection, delay refers to the worst movement.
(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro Per the analysis results shown in Table 3-1, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Existing Conditions.

SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed project would not have a significant project related traffic impact under Existing Conditions with Project.

Existing and Existing with Project peak hour analysis worksheets are provided in Appendices C and D, respectively.

Page 125 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 298 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
City of Indio Circulation Plan
Figure 3-1
INDIO INTERIM FINAL GENERAL PLAN | CHAPTER 4. MOBILITY
4-17
Figure 4-3: Circulation Plan
12

Page 126 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 299 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
City of Indio Public Transit Network
Figure 3-2
INDIO INTERIM FINAL GENERAL PLAN | CHAPTER 4. MOBILITY
4-12
Figure 4-2: Proposed Transit Network
13

Page 127 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 300 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
City of Indio Bicycle Network
Figure 3-3
INDIO INTERIM FINAL GENERAL PLAN | CHAPTER 4. MOBILITY
4-7
Figure 4-1: Planned Bicycle Network
14

Page 128 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 301 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
Existing Year 2022 AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
Figure 3-4
15

Page 129 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 302 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
Existing Plus Project AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
Figure 3-5
16

Page 130 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 303 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Opening Year Conditions (2023)
17 4.0 OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS (2023)

This section documents the circulation system conditions within the study area of the project under Opening Year without and with Project scenarios . The Opening Year without Project Conditions traffic volumes were developed by adding a 2% growth over a one-year period . Project traffic volumes are then added to the Opening Year without Project Conditions traffic volumes to develop Opening Year with Project Conditions traffic volumes . This section also documents potential cumulative project impacts on the existing local and regional circulation networks. No network improvements are assumed under Opening Year Condition scenarios.

ANALYSIS

Table 4-1 shows Opening Year Conditions (2023) intersection operation analysis results.

Figures 4-1 and 4-2 show Opening Year Conditions (2023) intersection turning movement volumes.

Table 4-1
Opening Year Conditions (2023) Intersection Operation Analysis

Intersection Opening Year Without Project Opening Year With Project Impact? Delay (a) LOS (b) Delay (a) LOS (b)
AM/PM Peak Hour

1. CA Highway 111 & Clinton
Street/Dr. Carreon Boulevard 20.2/22.7 C/C 20.3/22.9 C/C N/N

2. CA Highway 111 & Las Palmas Road 11.7/13.1 B/B 11.8/13.1 B/B N/N Notes:
(a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. At unsignalized intersection, delay refers to the worst movement.
(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro

Per the analysis results shown in Table 4-1, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Opening Year Conditions.

SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed project would not have a significant project related traffic impact under Opening Year with Project Conditions.

Opening Year and Opening Year with Project peak hour analysis worksheets are provided in Appendices E and F, respectively.

Page 131 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 304 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
Opening Year 2023 AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
Figure 4-1
18

Page 132 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 305 of 486 Wendy's Restaurant
Opening Year Plus Project AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
Figure 4-2
19

Page 133 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 306 of 486

APPENDIX A -

SCOPING AGREEMENT

Page 134 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 307 of 486

WENDY’S RESTAURANT PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 1 OF 4

Date: July 15, 2022

To: Juan Raya, City Engineer, City of Indio

From: George Ghossain, Principal Engineer, Integrated Engineering Group

Subject: Scoping Agreement for Wendy’s Restaurant Project, City of Indio

Integrated Engineering Group (IEG) is pleased to submit this scoping agreement for the Wendy’s Restaurant Project located on Highway 111 just east of Clinton Street in the City Indio. The subject project is proposing the construction of a 3,068 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive through.

Our goal is to obtain comments from City of Indio staff, to ensure that the traffic study fully addresses the potential impacts of the proposed Project including evaluation of project vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for CEQA transportation impact and level of service (LOS) deficiencies to support City of Indio General Plan policies. The remainder of this letter describes the draft proposed study area locations, project trip generation, project trip distribution on the surrounding roadway network, and analysis methodology.

The preliminary site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Figure 1 -1. It is anticipated that the proposed development will be built and occupied by Year 2023. Access to the Project site will be provided via Highway 111.

TRIP GENERATION FOR POTENTIAL USES
The Trip generation is a measure or forecast of the number of trips that begin or end at the project site.

The traffic generated is a function of the extent and type of development proposed for the site. These trips will result in some traffic increases on the streets where they occur. Vehicular traffic generation characteristics for projects are estimated based on established rates. These rates identify the probable traffic generation of various land uses based stud ies of developments in comparable settings. The rates used in this analysis were determined based on rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual,1 1th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). This document is widely used in Southern California and indicates the probable traffic generation rates for various

Page 135 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 308 of 486

WENDY’S RESTAURANT PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 2 OF 4

land uses based upon studies of existing developments in comparable sett ings. Project ITE average trip generation rates and trip calculations summary are presented in Table 1 and Table 2.

Table 1 - Project Trip Generation Rates
Land Use1 Units2 ITE LU
Code
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-through Window TSF 934 22.75 21.86 44.61 17.18 15.85 33.03 467.48 1Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2TSF = Thousand Square Feet

Table 2 - Project Trip Generation Summary
Land Use1 Intensity Units2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Fast Food Restaurant w/ Drive-through Window 3.07 TSF 70 67 137 53 49 102 1,434 Pass-by Reduction (50% - AM Peak Hour, 55% -
PM Peak Hour)3

STUDY AREA
The study area for this project was developed consistent with the Riverside County TIA Preparation Guide.

Figure 1-2 presents the project study area that includes the following key intersection locations:

Intersections

1. CA Highway 111 & Clinton Street/Dr. Carreon Boulevard

2. CA Highway 111 & Las Palmas Road

EXISTING AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Intersection turning movement counts will be conducted for one weekday during the morning and evening peak hours. The turning movement count s will be utilized in Synchro to dete rmine LOS at all study intersections. A 2% growth factor will be applied to develop 2022 turning movement and corresponding segment volumes at all analyzed intersections.

TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip distribution and assignment is the process of identifying the probable destinations, directions and traffic routes that project related traffic will likely affect. Trip distribution and assignment information can be estimated from observed traffic patterns, experience or through use of a computerized travel forecast model. Once the proposed developments trips have been estimated, they are assigned to the study area

Page 136 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 309 of 486

WENDY’S RESTAURANT PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 3 OF 4

network. For this development, the project distribution was developed based on the land use characteristics of the proposed project and surrounding area, anticipated travel patterns to and from the project site and existing travel patterns within the study area. Figures 1-2 show project trips distribution.

ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
Analysis of the intersection operating conditions during the peak periods will be conducted for the following anticipated timeframe scenarios:

• Existing Conditions
• Existing with Project Conditions
• Opening Year (Existing + ambient growth) Conditions
• Opening Year with Project Conditions

LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA
Street system operating conditions are typically described in terms of “level of service.” Level of service is a report-card scale used to indicate the quality of traffic flow on roadway segments and at intersections.

Level of service (LOS) ranges from LOS A (free flow, little congestion) to LOS F (forced flow, extreme congestion). The City of Indio has established LOS “D” as the minimum level of service for its intersections.

Therefore, any intersection operating at LOS “E” or worse will be considered deficient for the purposes of this analysis.

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE – INTERSECTIONS
Traffic impacts are identified if the proposed project will result in a significant change in traffic conditions on a roadway or intersection. A significant impact is normally defined when project related traffic would cause level of service to deteriorate to below the minimum acceptable level by a meas urable amount.

Impacts may also be significant if the location is already below the minimum acceptable level and project related traffic causes a further decline.

Level of Service D is frequently identified as the minimum allowable “Standard” service level during peak hours at signalized intersections. Most arriving traffic will clear the intersection on the first allowable green cycle under this level of service. Mitigation measures shall be considered by development projects within the City of Indio when traffic conditions are forecasted to decline to poorer levels of service. If addition of project traffic resulted in an intersection falling from a satisfactory LOS D or better to an unsatisfactory LOS, mitigation shall be provided to improve the intersection to a satisfactory LOS. In cases where the addition of the project will result in a further deterioration of the LOS at an intersection operating unsatisfactorily, the project shall mitigate the intersection to pre-project LOS.

Page 137 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 310 of 486

WENDY’S RESTAURANT PROJECT
SCOPING AGREEMENT | PAGE 4 OF 4

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) – California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) COMPLIANCE On September 27, 2013, Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed into State law and started a process intended to fundamentally change transportation impact analysis as part of the CEQA compliance. The California Natural Resource Agency updated the CEQA transportation analysis guidelines in 2018. In this update automobile delay and level of service (LOS) metrics are no longer to be used in determining transportation impacts. After July 1, 2020, trans portation analysis under CEQA must use VMT to determine impacts for land use projects. The City of Indio has not adopted any VMT Guidelines for CEQA Analysis ; therefore, County of Riverside VMT guidelines will be used as the basis to evaluate potential VMT impacts for this project.

Sincerely, Approved By:

IEG
Signature:

Name:

George Ghossain, P.E., MSCE, MPA Address:

Principal Engineer

Attachments: Project Site Plan
Project Study Area & Trip Distribution

Page 138 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 311 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant
Project Study Area and Trip Distribution
Figure 1-2
# IntersectionLEGEND

PROJECT SITE
2 1
25%
15%
10%
40%
10%10%

Page 139 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 312 of 486 ENGINEERING | PLANNING | SURVEY | ENVIRONMENTAL44-600 Village Court, Suite 100Palm Desert, CA 92260t.760.346.4750 f. 760.340.0089TheAltumGroup.com

Page 140 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 313 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant TIA Opening Year Conditions (2023)
21 APPENDIX B -

TRAFFIC COUNT DATA

Page 141 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 314 of 486

APPENDIX B -

TRAFFIC COUNT DATA

Page 142 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 315 of 486

T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC3550
Thu, Jul 28, 22NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 1
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 0.5 0.5 1 2 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 32 32 2 10 31 15 6 42 17 3 44 10 244 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 48 40 4 11 33 15 5 42 32 3 73 11 317 0 0 1 1 2
7:30 AM 59 43 4 9 33 15 5 46 24 7 64 9 318 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 47 39 4 11 69 17 7 64 40 9 75 10 392 0 0 0 1 1
8:00 AM 42 34 11 21 44 11 7 56 35 11 60 11 343 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 42 31 5 16 47 11 5 72 38 11 56 7 341 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 48 35 8 14 39 18 9 60 29 11 61 15 347 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 65 29 4 21 50 12 5 69 32 11 75 8 381 0 0 0 2 2
VOLUMES 383 283 42 113 346 114 49 451 247 66 508 81 2,683 0 0 1 4 5 APPROACH % 54% 40% 6% 20% 60% 20% 7% 60% 33% 10% 78% 12% APP/DEPART 708 / 412 573 / 655 747 / 610 655 / 1,006 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 179 139 28 62 199 57 28 252 142 42 252 43 1,423 APPROACH % 52% 40% 8% 19% 63% 18% 7% 60% 34% 12% 75% 13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.951 0.820 0.917 0.896 0.908
APP/DEPART 346 / 210 318 / 382 422 / 343 337 / 488 0
4:00 PM 58 44 7 18 34 12 17 137 61 10 102 18 518 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 45 47 9 35 58 12 27 147 46 5 109 20 560 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 66 47 5 29 58 18 13 139 55 12 107 17 566 0 0 0 1 1 4:45 PM 49 48 8 31 63 11 12 144 47 13 110 19 555 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 61 70 7 29 58 9 14 149 52 6 107 20 582 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 63 54 7 29 74 14 19 129 58 15 108 33 603 0 0 0 1 1 5:30 PM 61 52 5 35 60 12 18 140 45 8 86 29 551 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 28 51 7 28 57 20 28 142 60 11 73 28 533 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 431 413 55 234 462 108 148 1,127 424 80 802 184 4,468 0 0 0 2 2 APPROACH % 48% 46% 6% 29% 57% 13% 9% 66% 25% 8% 75% 17% APP/DEPART 899 / 745 804 / 964 1,699 / 1,418 1,066 / 1,341 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 239 219 27 118 253 52 58 561 212 46 432 89 2,306 APPROACH % 49% 45% 6% 28% 60% 12% 7% 68% 26% 8% 76% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.879 0.904 0.966 0.909 0.956
APP/DEPART 485 / 366 423 / 509 831 / 708 567 / 723 0
Clinton

NORTH SIDE
CA 111 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE CA 111

SOUTH SIDE
Clinton

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Indio
Clinton
CA 111

U-TURNS
Clinton - Dr Carreon Clinton - Dr Carreon CA 111 CA 111 AM
7:45 AM
PM
4:30 PM
Add U-Turns to Left Turns

Page 143 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 316 of 486 1,377 222 808 347 TOTAL 1,157
804 108 462 234 PM 745
573 114 346 113 AM 412
655 1,066 1,721
2,347 1,341 1,006
81 184 265 508 802 1,310

TOTALPMAM
66 80 146
197 148 49

AMPMTOTAL
1,578 1,127 451 671 424 247
610 1,418 2,028
2,446 1,699 747
655 AM 383 283 42 708
964 PM 431 413 55 899
1,619 TOTAL 814 696 97 1,607
741 109 452 180 TOTAL 576
423 52 253 118 PM 366
318 57 199 62 AM 210
337 567 904
1,211 723 488
43 89 132 252 432 684
TOTALPMAMAM 7:45 AM
8:45 AM
42 46 88
86 58 28
#N/A

AMPMTOTAL
813 561 252 PM 4:30 PM
5:45 PM
354 212 142
343 708 1,051
1,253 831 422
382 AM 179 139 28 346
509 PM 239 219 27 485
891 Total 418 358 55 831
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Clinton - Dr Carreon
CA 111
CA 111
Indio
SC3550

ALL HOURS
Clinton - Dr Carreon
Clinton - Dr Carreon
Clinton - Dr Carreon
CA 111
CA 111

PEAK HOUR

Page 144 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 317 of 486

T218
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC3550
Thu, Jul 28, 22NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 2
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 9 2 3 0 5 1 2 41 2 0 57 0 122 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 10 4 1 2 6 2 1 44 7 0 78 2 157 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 11 8 5 2 3 4 1 56 7 2 77 4 180 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 11 8 2 4 7 1 3 66 1 0 75 4 182 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 6 6 7 5 4 4 2 61 4 1 75 8 183 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 2 4 2 3 3 5 3 62 9 0 67 5 165 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 8 7 4 6 5 6 4 73 6 1 83 4 207 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 4 2 3 5 5 4 2 72 2 1 88 5 193 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 61 41 27 27 38 27 18 475 38 5 600 32 1,389 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 47% 32% 21% 29% 41% 29% 3% 89% 7% 1% 94% 5%
APP/DEPART 129 / 91 92 / 81 531 / 529 637 / 688 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 20 19 16 19 17 19 11 268 21 3 313 22 748
APPROACH % 36% 35% 29% 35% 31% 35% 4% 89% 7% 1% 93% 7%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.724 0.809 0.904 0.899 0.903
APP/DEPART 55 / 52 55 / 41 300 / 303 338 / 352 0
4:00 PM 14 7 12 7 14 6 2 174 17 6 135 17 411 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 12 11 5 8 9 8 14 156 16 8 125 10 382 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 11 10 10 12 10 6 6 140 14 7 117 13 356 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 7 4 7 5 7 3 5 147 21 5 114 4 329 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 13 8 5 6 13 3 4 134 20 5 126 7 344 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 13 8 7 2 11 5 5 145 16 8 131 6 357 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 18 2 12 9 6 2 6 147 8 9 118 7 344 0 0 0 1 1
5:45 PM 11 6 8 4 8 6 6 127 24 8 87 9 304 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 99 56 66 53 78 39 48 1,170 136 56 953 73 2,827 0 0 0 1 1 APPROACH % 45% 25% 30% 31% 46% 23% 4% 86% 10% 5% 88% 7% APP/DEPART 221 / 177 170 / 269 1,354 / 1,290 1,082 / 1,091 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 44 32 34 32 40 23 27 617 68 26 491 44 1,478
APPROACH % 40% 29% 31% 34% 42% 24% 4% 87% 10% 5% 88% 8% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.833 0.848 0.922 0.888 0.899
APP/DEPART 110 / 103 95 / 134 712 / 683 561 / 558 0
Las Palmas

NORTH SIDE
CA 111 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE CA 111

SOUTH SIDE
Las Palmas
AM
8:00 AM
PM
4:00 PM

U-TURNS
Las Palmas Las Palmas CA 111 CA 111

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected] Indio
Las Palmas
CA 111
Add U-Turns to Left Turns

Page 145 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 318 of 486 262 66 116 80 TOTAL 268
170 39 78 53 PM 177
92 27 38 27 AM 91
637 1,082 1,719
1,779 1,091 688
32 73 105 600 953 1,553

TOTALPMAM
5 56 61
66 48 18

AMPMTOTAL
1,645 1,170 475 174 136 38
529 1,290 1,819
1,885 1,354 531
81 AM 61 41 27 129
269 PM 99 56 66 221
350 TOTAL 160 97 93 350
150 42 57 51 TOTAL 155
95 23 40 32 PM 103
55 19 17 19 AM 52
338 561 899
910 558 352
22 44 66 313 491 804
TOTALPMAMAM 8:00 AM
8:45 AM
3 26 29
38 27 11
#N/A

AMPMTOTAL
885 617 268 PM 4:00 PM
5:45 PM
89 68 21
303 683 986
1,012 712 300
41 AM 20 19 16 55
134 PM 44 32 34 110
175 Total 64 51 50 165
Las Palmas
Las Palmas
Las Palmas
CA 111
CA 111

PEAK HOUR
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Las Palmas
CA 111
CA 111
Indio
SC3550

ALL HOURS

Page 146 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 319 of 486

APPENDIX C -

EXISTING CONDITIONS PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 147 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 320 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/02/2022
Existing Year 2022 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 252 142 42 252 43 179 139 28 62 199 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 252 142 42 252 43 179 139 28 62 199 57 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 277 156 46 277 47 197 153 31 68 219 63 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 62 666 310 84 918 151 318 343 69 108 536 151 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3404 1585 1781 4419 725 3456 1509 306 1781 2740 769 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 277 156 46 211 113 197 0 184 68 140 142 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1740 1728 0 1815 1781 1777 1732 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 3.6 4.5 1.3 2.7 2.8 2.8 0.0 4.5 1.9 3.5 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 3.6 4.5 1.3 2.7 2.8 2.8 0.0 4.5 1.9 3.5 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.44
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 62 666 310 84 707 362 318 0 412 108 348 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.42 0.50 0.55 0.30 0.31 0.62 0.00 0.45 0.63 0.40 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 174 1199 558 174 1199 613 541 0 1066 279 1043 1017 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.2 18.0 18.3 23.8 17.1 17.1 22.3 0.0 17.0 23.4 17.9 18.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.1 0.4 1.3 5.5 0.2 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.8 5.9 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.3 1.5 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.0 1.7 0.9 1.3 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.3 18.4 19.6 29.4 17.3 17.6 24.3 0.0 17.7 29.4 18.7 18.8 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C A B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 464 370 381 350
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.6 18.9 21.1 20.8
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 17.6 8.4 16.0 10.7 16.0 7.8 16.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 6.5 3.3 6.5 4.8 5.7 2.9 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.0 0.2 1.5 0.0 1.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.1
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 148 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 321 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/02/2022
Existing Year 2022 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 268 21 3 313 22 20 19 16 19 17 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 268 21 3 313 22 20 19 16 19 17 19 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 295 23 3 344 24 22 21 18 21 19 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 28 1308 100 7 1263 87 311 252 411 219 185 146 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4836 371 1781 4878 336 656 973 1585 360 713 563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 206 112 3 239 129 43 0 18 61 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1804 1781 1702 1810 1629 0 1585 1637 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 1.8 1.9 0.1 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 1.8 1.9 0.1 2.2 2.2 0.7 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.19 0.51 1.00 0.34 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 28 921 488 7 881 469 563 0 411 549 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.22 0.23 0.41 0.27 0.28 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 231 2293 1215 231 2293 1219 1419 0 1273 1406 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.8 10.9 10.9 19.2 11.4 11.4 10.8 0.0 10.7 11.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.2 0.1 0.2 33.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.0 11.1 11.2 52.2 11.6 11.7 10.9 0.0 10.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B D B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 330 371 61 61
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.8 11.9 10.9 11.1
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 6.2 16.4 16.0 6.6 16.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 2.1 3.9 3.0 2.3 4.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.0 2.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.7
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 149 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 322 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/02/2022
Existing Year 2022 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 561 212 46 432 89 239 219 27 118 253 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 561 212 46 432 89 239 219 27 118 253 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 60 584 221 48 450 93 249 228 28 123 264 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 97 879 324 84 989 199 366 318 39 160 527 106 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3674 1356 1781 4262 858 3456 1634 201 1781 2947 593 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 60 540 265 48 357 186 249 0 256 123 158 160 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1626 1781 1702 1716 1728 0 1834 1781 1777 1764 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 8.0 8.3 1.5 5.0 5.2 3.9 0.0 7.3 3.8 4.5 4.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 8.0 8.3 1.5 5.0 5.2 3.9 0.0 7.3 3.8 4.5 4.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 97 814 389 84 790 398 366 0 357 160 318 315 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.57 0.45 0.47 0.68 0.00 0.72 0.77 0.50 0.51 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 159 1095 523 159 1095 552 494 0 853 382 953 946 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.9 19.2 19.3 26.1 18.4 18.5 24.1 0.0 21.1 24.9 20.7 20.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.4 0.9 2.2 6.1 0.4 0.9 2.3 0.0 2.7 7.5 1.2 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 2.9 3.0 0.7 1.8 1.9 1.5 0.0 3.0 1.8 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.3 20.2 21.5 32.2 18.8 19.4 26.4 0.0 23.8 32.3 21.9 22.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C B B C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 865 591 505 441
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.4 20.1 25.1 24.9
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 16.9 8.6 19.4 11.9 16.0 9.0 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 26.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.8 9.3 3.5 10.3 5.9 6.6 3.8 7.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.2 0.0 3.1 0.2 1.7 0.0 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.5
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 150 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 323 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/02/2022
Existing Year 2022 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 27 617 68 26 491 44 44 32 34 32 40 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 27 617 68 26 491 44 44 32 34 32 40 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 30 686 76 29 546 49 49 36 38 36 44 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 63 1337 147 61 1362 121 321 201 385 203 217 98 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4669 513 1781 4774 424 756 827 1585 354 893 405 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 30 499 263 29 388 207 85 0 38 106 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1778 1781 1702 1794 1583 0 1585 1652 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 5.0 5.1 0.7 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 5.0 5.1 0.7 3.8 3.8 1.5 0.0 0.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.24 0.58 1.00 0.34 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 63 974 509 61 971 512 522 0 385 518 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.51 0.52 0.47 0.40 0.41 0.16 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 216 2148 1122 216 2148 1132 1294 0 1192 1323 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.5 12.3 12.3 19.5 11.9 11.9 12.4 0.0 12.1 12.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 0.4 0.8 5.6 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.5 1.7 0.3 1.1 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.0 12.7 13.1 25.2 12.1 12.4 12.5 0.0 12.2 12.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 792 624 123 106
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.3 12.8 12.4 12.8
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 7.4 17.8 16.0 7.5 17.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 2.7 7.1 4.0 2.7 5.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 4.7 0.6 0.0 3.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.0
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 151 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 324 of 486

APPENDIX D -

EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 152 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 325 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Existing + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 261 142 45 260 48 179 139 32 67 199 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 261 142 45 260 48 179 139 32 67 199 57 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 287 156 49 286 53 197 153 35 74 219 63 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 62 665 310 87 912 163 317 329 75 113 535 150 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3404 1585 1781 4355 779 3456 1473 337 1781 2740 769 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 287 156 49 221 118 197 0 188 74 140 142 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1730 1728 0 1810 1781 1777 1732 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 3.8 4.5 1.4 2.8 3.0 2.8 0.0 4.6 2.1 3.5 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 3.8 4.5 1.4 2.8 3.0 2.8 0.0 4.6 2.1 3.5 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.44
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 62 665 310 87 713 362 317 0 404 113 347 338 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.43 0.50 0.56 0.31 0.32 0.62 0.00 0.46 0.65 0.40 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 174 1197 557 174 1197 608 540 0 1025 313 1041 1015 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.3 18.1 18.4 23.8 17.1 17.2 22.4 0.0 17.2 23.4 18.0 18.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.1 0.4 1.3 5.5 0.2 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.8 6.2 0.8 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.3 1.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.7 1.0 1.3 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 18.5 19.7 29.4 17.4 17.7 24.4 0.0 18.1 29.7 18.8 18.9 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C A B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 474 388 385 356
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.7 19.0 21.3 21.1
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.3 17.4 8.5 16.0 10.7 16.0 7.8 16.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 29.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 6.6 3.4 6.5 4.8 5.7 2.9 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.9 0.0 2.1 0.2 1.5 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.2
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 153 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 326 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Existing + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 281 24 3 327 22 24 19 16 19 17 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 281 24 3 327 22 24 19 16 19 17 19 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 309 26 3 359 24 26 21 18 21 19 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 28 1300 108 7 1267 84 332 228 411 219 185 146 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4805 398 1781 4893 323 723 881 1585 360 713 563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 217 118 3 248 135 47 0 18 61 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1799 1781 1702 1812 1604 0 1585 1637 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 1.9 2.0 0.1 2.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 1.9 2.0 0.1 2.3 2.3 0.7 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.18 0.55 1.00 0.34 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 28 921 487 7 882 469 560 0 411 549 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.24 0.24 0.41 0.28 0.29 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 231 2293 1212 231 2293 1221 1406 0 1273 1406 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.8 11.0 11.0 19.2 11.4 11.4 10.9 0.0 10.7 11.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.2 0.1 0.3 33.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.0 11.1 11.2 52.2 11.6 11.8 10.9 0.0 10.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B D B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 347 386 65 61
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.8 12.0 10.9 11.1
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 6.2 16.4 16.0 6.6 16.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 2.1 4.0 3.0 2.3 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 1.9 0.3 0.0 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.7
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 154 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 327 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Existing + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 567 212 48 438 92 239 219 29 122 253 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 567 212 48 438 92 239 219 29 122 253 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 60 591 221 50 456 96 249 228 30 127 264 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 96 885 323 86 995 204 366 310 41 165 525 106 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3686 1346 1781 4247 871 3456 1619 213 1781 2947 593 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 60 545 267 50 363 189 249 0 258 127 158 160 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1628 1781 1702 1714 1728 0 1832 1781 1777 1764 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 8.1 8.4 1.5 5.1 5.3 3.9 0.0 7.4 3.9 4.5 4.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 8.1 8.4 1.5 5.1 5.3 3.9 0.0 7.4 3.9 4.5 4.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 96 817 391 86 797 401 366 0 350 165 317 314 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.67 0.68 0.58 0.46 0.47 0.68 0.00 0.74 0.77 0.50 0.51 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 159 1092 522 159 1092 550 493 0 849 381 950 943 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.0 19.3 19.4 26.2 18.4 18.5 24.2 0.0 21.4 24.9 20.8 20.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.4 0.9 2.3 6.1 0.4 0.9 2.3 0.0 3.0 7.3 1.2 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 2.9 3.0 0.7 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.0 3.1 1.8 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.4 20.2 21.7 32.3 18.8 19.4 26.5 0.0 24.4 32.1 22.0 22.1 LnGrp LOS C C C C B B C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 872 602 507 445
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.5 20.1 25.4 24.9
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.2 16.7 8.7 19.5 11.9 16.0 9.0 19.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 26.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 9.4 3.5 10.4 5.9 6.6 3.9 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.2 0.0 3.1 0.2 1.7 0.0 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.6
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 155 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 328 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Existing + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 27 626 70 26 501 44 46 32 34 32 40 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 27 626 70 26 501 44 46 32 34 32 40 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 30 696 78 29 557 49 51 36 38 36 44 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 63 1348 150 61 1378 120 325 195 383 202 216 98 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4663 518 1781 4783 417 773 806 1585 354 893 405 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 30 507 267 29 395 211 87 0 38 106 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1777 1781 1702 1795 1579 0 1585 1652 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 5.1 5.2 0.7 3.9 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 5.1 5.2 0.7 3.9 3.9 1.5 0.0 0.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.23 0.59 1.00 0.34 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 63 984 514 61 981 517 519 0 383 516 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.51 0.52 0.48 0.40 0.41 0.17 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 215 2139 1116 215 2139 1128 1286 0 1187 1317 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.6 12.3 12.3 19.6 11.9 11.9 12.5 0.0 12.2 12.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 0.4 0.8 5.6 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.6 1.7 0.3 1.2 1.3 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.1 12.7 13.1 25.3 12.1 12.4 12.6 0.0 12.3 12.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 804 635 125 106
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.3 12.8 12.5 12.8
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 7.4 18.0 16.0 7.5 17.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 2.7 7.2 4.0 2.7 5.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 4.8 0.6 0.0 3.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.0
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 156 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 329 of 486

APPENDIX E -
OPENING YEAR (2023) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 157 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 330 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year 2023 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 29 257 145 43 257 44 183 142 29 63 203 58 Future Volume (veh/h) 29 257 145 43 257 44 183 142 29 63 203 58 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 32 282 159 47 282 48 201 156 32 69 223 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 64 665 310 85 915 151 321 342 70 109 535 150 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3404 1585 1781 4416 727 3456 1506 309 1781 2741 768 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 32 282 159 47 215 115 201 0 188 69 143 144 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1739 1728 0 1815 1781 1777 1732 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 3.7 4.6 1.3 2.7 2.9 2.9 0.0 4.6 1.9 3.6 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 3.7 4.6 1.3 2.7 2.9 2.9 0.0 4.6 1.9 3.6 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.44
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 64 665 310 85 705 360 321 0 412 109 347 338 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.42 0.51 0.55 0.31 0.32 0.63 0.00 0.46 0.63 0.41 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 174 1197 557 174 1197 612 540 0 1063 278 1041 1015 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.2 18.1 18.4 23.8 17.2 17.2 22.4 0.0 17.1 23.5 18.0 18.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.0 0.4 1.3 5.5 0.2 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.8 6.0 0.8 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.3 1.6 0.6 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.7 0.9 1.3 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.3 18.5 19.7 29.4 17.4 17.7 24.4 0.0 17.8 29.5 18.8 18.9 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C A B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 473 377 389 356
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.7 19.0 21.2 20.9
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 17.6 8.4 16.0 10.8 16.0 7.8 16.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 6.6 3.3 6.6 4.9 5.7 2.9 4.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.1 0.2 1.5 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.2
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 158 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 331 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year 2023 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 273 21 3 319 22 20 19 16 19 17 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 273 21 3 319 22 20 19 16 19 17 19 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 300 23 3 351 24 22 21 18 21 19 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 28 1310 99 7 1265 85 311 252 411 219 185 146 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4843 366 1781 4885 330 656 973 1585 360 713 563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 210 113 3 243 132 43 0 18 61 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1805 1781 1702 1811 1629 0 1585 1637 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 1.8 1.9 0.1 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 1.8 1.9 0.1 2.2 2.2 0.7 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.18 0.51 1.00 0.34 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 28 921 488 7 881 469 563 0 411 549 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.23 0.23 0.41 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 231 2293 1216 231 2293 1220 1419 0 1273 1406 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.8 10.9 11.0 19.2 11.4 11.4 10.8 0.0 10.7 11.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.2 0.1 0.2 33.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.0 11.1 11.2 52.2 11.6 11.8 10.9 0.0 10.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B D B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 335 378 61 61
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.8 12.0 10.9 11.1
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 6.2 16.4 16.0 6.6 16.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 2.1 3.9 3.0 2.3 4.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.3 0.0 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.7
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 159 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 332 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year 2023 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 59 572 216 47 441 91 244 223 28 120 258 53 Future Volume (veh/h) 59 572 216 47 441 91 244 223 28 120 258 53 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 61 596 225 49 459 95 254 232 29 125 269 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 97 887 327 85 999 201 371 315 39 163 523 105 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3675 1355 1781 4260 859 3456 1630 204 1781 2947 593 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 61 551 270 49 364 190 254 0 261 125 161 163 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1626 1781 1702 1716 1728 0 1834 1781 1777 1764 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 8.3 8.5 1.5 5.2 5.4 4.0 0.0 7.5 3.9 4.6 4.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 8.3 8.5 1.5 5.2 5.4 4.0 0.0 7.5 3.9 4.6 4.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 97 822 393 85 798 402 371 0 355 163 315 313 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.67 0.69 0.58 0.46 0.47 0.68 0.00 0.74 0.77 0.51 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 158 1088 520 158 1088 548 491 0 847 380 946 939 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.1 19.3 19.4 26.3 18.5 18.6 24.2 0.0 21.4 25.0 20.9 21.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 1.0 2.4 6.1 0.4 0.9 2.5 0.0 3.0 7.4 1.3 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.0 3.1 0.7 1.9 2.0 1.6 0.0 3.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.5 20.3 21.9 32.4 18.9 19.4 26.7 0.0 24.3 32.4 22.2 22.3 LnGrp LOS C C C C B B C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 882 603 515 449
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.6 20.2 25.5 25.1
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.1 16.9 8.7 19.6 12.0 16.0 9.1 19.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 26.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 9.5 3.5 10.5 6.0 6.7 3.9 7.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.2 0.0 3.1 0.2 1.7 0.0 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.7
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 160 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 333 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year 2023 Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 629 69 27 501 45 45 33 35 33 41 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 629 69 27 501 45 45 33 35 33 41 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 699 77 30 557 50 50 37 39 37 46 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 64 1352 148 63 1377 122 319 200 382 202 218 95 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4672 511 1781 4774 424 754 831 1585 354 905 394 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 508 268 30 396 211 87 0 39 109 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1778 1781 1702 1794 1584 0 1585 1653 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 5.2 5.2 0.7 3.9 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 5.2 5.2 0.7 3.9 3.9 1.5 0.0 0.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.24 0.57 1.00 0.34 0.24
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 64 985 515 63 982 517 519 0 382 515 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.52 0.52 0.48 0.40 0.41 0.17 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 215 2135 1115 215 2135 1125 1286 0 1185 1316 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.6 12.3 12.3 19.6 11.9 11.9 12.5 0.0 12.2 12.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 0.4 0.8 5.5 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.6 1.7 0.3 1.2 1.3 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.1 12.7 13.1 25.2 12.1 12.4 12.7 0.0 12.4 12.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 807 637 126 109
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.3 12.8 12.6 12.9
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 7.5 18.0 16.0 7.5 18.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 2.7 7.2 4.0 2.7 5.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 4.8 0.6 0.0 3.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.1
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 161 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 334 of 486

APPENDIX F -
OPENING YEAR (2024) WITH PROJECT PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 162 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 335 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 29 266 145 46 265 49 183 142 33 68 203 58 Future Volume (veh/h) 29 266 145 46 265 49 183 142 33 68 203 58 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 32 292 159 51 291 54 201 156 36 75 223 64 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 64 663 309 90 912 163 321 329 76 114 534 150 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3404 1585 1781 4354 780 3456 1470 339 1781 2741 768 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 32 292 159 51 225 120 201 0 192 75 143 144 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1730 1728 0 1809 1781 1777 1732 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 3.9 4.6 1.4 2.9 3.0 2.9 0.0 4.7 2.1 3.6 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 3.9 4.6 1.4 2.9 3.0 2.9 0.0 4.7 2.1 3.6 3.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.44
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 64 663 309 90 713 362 321 0 405 114 346 337 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.44 0.52 0.57 0.32 0.33 0.63 0.00 0.47 0.66 0.41 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 173 1193 556 173 1193 606 538 0 1022 312 1038 1012 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.3 18.2 18.5 23.8 17.2 17.2 22.4 0.0 17.3 23.5 18.1 18.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.0 0.5 1.3 5.6 0.3 0.5 2.0 0.0 0.9 6.3 0.8 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.4 1.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.8 1.0 1.3 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 18.7 19.8 29.4 17.4 17.8 24.4 0.0 18.2 29.8 18.9 19.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C A B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 483 396 393 362
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.8 19.1 21.4 21.2
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.3 17.5 8.6 16.0 10.8 16.0 7.8 16.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 29.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 6.7 3.4 6.6 4.9 5.8 2.9 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.9 0.0 2.1 0.2 1.5 0.0 1.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.3
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 163 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 336 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: AM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 11 286 24 3 333 22 24 19 16 19 17 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 11 286 24 3 333 22 24 19 16 19 17 19 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 314 26 3 366 24 26 21 18 21 19 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 28 1302 106 7 1269 82 332 228 411 219 185 146 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4812 392 1781 4900 318 723 881 1585 360 713 563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 12 221 119 3 253 137 47 0 18 61 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1800 1781 1702 1813 1604 0 1585 1637 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.3 2.3 0.7 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.18 0.55 1.00 0.34 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 28 921 487 7 882 470 560 0 411 549 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.24 0.25 0.41 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 231 2293 1212 231 2293 1221 1406 0 1273 1406 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.8 11.0 11.0 19.2 11.4 11.5 10.9 0.0 10.7 11.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.2 0.1 0.3 33.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.0 11.1 11.3 52.2 11.6 11.8 10.9 0.0 10.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B D B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 352 393 65 61
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.8 12.0 10.9 11.1
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 6.2 16.4 16.0 6.6 16.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 2.1 4.0 3.0 2.3 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 2.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.8
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 164 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 337 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
1: Dr Carreon Blvd/Clinton St & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 59 578 216 49 447 94 244 223 30 124 258 53 Future Volume (veh/h) 59 578 216 49 447 94 244 223 30 124 258 53 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 61 602 225 51 466 98 254 232 31 129 269 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 97 891 325 87 1002 205 370 311 42 168 529 106 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3686 1347 1781 4247 871 3456 1616 216 1781 2947 593 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 61 555 272 51 371 193 254 0 263 129 161 163 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1628 1781 1702 1714 1728 0 1832 1781 1777 1764 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 8.4 8.6 1.6 5.3 5.5 4.0 0.0 7.7 4.0 4.6 4.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 8.4 8.6 1.6 5.3 5.5 4.0 0.0 7.7 4.0 4.6 4.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.34
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 97 823 393 87 803 404 370 0 352 168 319 316 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.67 0.69 0.59 0.46 0.48 0.69 0.00 0.75 0.77 0.50 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 157 1080 517 157 1080 544 487 0 840 377 940 933 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.3 19.5 19.6 26.4 18.6 18.7 24.4 0.0 21.6 25.1 21.0 21.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 1.1 2.6 6.2 0.4 0.9 2.6 0.0 3.2 7.2 1.2 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.1 3.2 0.8 1.9 2.0 1.6 0.0 3.2 1.9 1.8 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.8 20.6 22.2 32.6 19.0 19.5 27.0 0.0 24.8 32.3 22.2 22.4 LnGrp LOS C C C C B B C A C C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 888 615 517 453
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.9 20.3 25.9 25.1
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 16.9 8.8 19.7 12.1 16.2 9.1 19.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 26.0 5.0 18.0 8.0 30.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 9.7 3.6 10.6 6.0 6.8 3.9 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.2 0.0 3.1 0.2 1.7 0.0 2.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.9
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 165 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 338 of 486 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Wendy's
2: Las Palmas Rd & CA - 111 08/06/2022
Opening Year + Project Synchro 10 Report
Timing Plan: PM Peak
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 638 71 27 511 45 47 33 35 33 41 23 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 638 71 27 511 45 47 33 35 33 41 23 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 709 79 30 568 50 52 37 39 37 46 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 64 1364 151 63 1393 121 322 195 381 201 217 95 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 4666 516 1781 4782 417 770 811 1585 354 905 394 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 516 272 30 403 215 89 0 39 109 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1702 1778 1781 1702 1795 1581 0 1585 1653 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 5.3 5.3 0.7 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 5.3 5.3 0.7 4.0 4.0 1.6 0.0 0.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.23 0.58 1.00 0.34 0.24
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 64 995 520 63 992 523 517 0 381 513 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.52 0.52 0.48 0.41 0.41 0.17 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 214 2126 1110 214 2126 1121 1278 0 1180 1310 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.7 12.3 12.3 19.7 11.9 11.9 12.6 0.0 12.3 12.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.5 0.4 0.8 5.6 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.6 1.8 0.3 1.2 1.3 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.1 12.7 13.1 25.3 12.1 12.4 12.8 0.0 12.4 13.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B B A B B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 819 648 128 109
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.3 12.8 12.7 13.0
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.0 7.5 18.2 16.0 7.5 18.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 5.0 26.0 31.0 5.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 2.7 7.3 4.0 2.7 6.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 4.8 0.6 0.0 3.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.1
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 166 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 339 of 486 Prepared for:

The Altum Group
44-600 Village Court, Suite 100
Palm Desert CA, 92260

Prepared by:

23905 Clinton Keith Road 114-280
Wildomar, CA 92595

August 2022

Wendy’s Restaurant
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis

Page 167 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 340 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant VMT
1 1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this report is to evaluate the project’s VMT analysis requirements and compliance with Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) and The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is proposing the construction of a 3,068 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive through along Highway 111 just east of Clinton Street in the City of Indio. Access will be provided via an existing driveway on California Highway 111.

Figure 1-1 shows the Project site plan.

1.2 SENATE BILL 743
On September 27, 2013, SB 743 was signed into State law and started a process intended to fundamentally change transportation impact analysis as part of the CEQA compliance. The California Natural Resource Agency updated the CEQA transportation analysis guidelines in 2018. In this update automobile delay and LOS metrics are no longer to be used in determining transportation impacts.

Instead VMT metrics will serve as the basis in determining impacts. Furthermore, the guidelines stated that after July 1, 2020, transportation analysis under CEQA must use VMT to determine impact s for land use projects.

1.3 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
The project is located in the City of Indio within the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside. The City has adopted the County of Riversi de VMT Guideline which will be use d for guidance on evaluating VMT for transportation impacts under CEQA. For this project the County of Riverside’s, “Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service, Vehicle Miles Traveled”, December 2020 1, hereafter referred to as Guidelines.

1 https://rctlma.org/Portals/7/2020-12-15%20-%20Transportation%20Analysis%20Guidelines.pdf

Page 168 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 341 of 486 ENGINEERING | PLANNING | SURVEY | ENVIRONMENTAL44-600 Village Court, Suite 100Palm Desert, CA 92260t.760.346.4750 f. 760.340.0089TheAltumGroup.com

Page 169 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 342 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant VMT

3 2.0 ANALYSIS METHODOLGY
The Guidelines adopted by Riverside County require a 5-step process2 for VMT analysis:

2. Identify VMT Measure: If the project does not meet any screening criteria, the project will need to identify the appropriate VMT metric as identified in the Guidelines based on land use type.

3. Identify VMT Threshold: Based on the required VMT Measure the project will need to identify the appropriate VMT Measure threshold as required in the Guidelines.

4. Assessment of Impact: Project will need to evaluate its project specific VMT Measure against the appropriate VMT Threshold to determine if the project would have an CEQA transportation VMT impact.

2.1 SCREENING CRITERIA

2.1.1 County of Riverside Transportation Analysis Guidelines Screening Criteria The Guidelines recognize that certain projects based on type, location, size and other contexts could lead to a presumption of less than significance (i.e. the project’s VMT would not cause a transportation impact) and would not need additional VMT analysis. The Guidelines provide the following screening criteria3:

1. Small Project s: This applies to projects with low trip generation per existing CEQA exemptions or based on the County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Screening Tables, result in a 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e) per year screening level threshold.”

2. Projects Near High Quality Transit: High quality transit provides a viable option for many to replace automobile trips with transit trips resulting in an overall reduction in VMT.

3. Local Retail: The introduction of new Local-serving retail has been determined to reduce VMT by shortening trips that will occur.

4. Affordable Housing: Lower -income residents make fewer trips on averag e, resulting in lower VMT overall.

5. Local Essential Service : As with Local -Serving Retail, the introduction of new Local Essential services shortens non -discretionary trips by putting those goods and services closer to residents.

7. Redevelopment Projects: Projects with lower VMT than existing on -site uses, can under limited circumstances, be presumed to have a non -significant impact. In the event this screening does not apply, projects should be analyzed as though there is no existing uses on site (project analysis cannot take credit for existing VMT).

2 Guidelines, Figure 2 VMT Analysis Flow Chart
3 Guidelines, Figure 3 Screening Criteria for Development Projects

Page 170 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 343 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant VMT

4 2.2 VMT ANALYSIS
Projects that do not meet any of the screening criteria identified would need to perform a VMT analysis per the Guidelines. The project would need evaluate the appropriate VMT metrics and compare them to thresholds to determine significance as defined by the Guidelines4.

2.2.1 VMT Measures
The Guidelines assign the appropriate VMT Measure for land use projects based on land use type. Residential and Office uses are required to use the relevant VMT efficiency metric, VMT per Capita or Work VMT per Employee respectively. Retail and similar uses are required to use a total VMT metric to measure the net change in VMT a project would create due to the “customer component” of the project.

2.3 VMT THRESHOLDS
Once a project identifies the appropriate VMT measures for the proposed land uses it would need to be compared to thresholds for those metrics to determine significance under CEQA. The County has chosen to base its thresholds on the county and county-wide averages.

The thresholds5 as defined by the Guidelines provides are as follows:

• Residential Projects: exceeding 15.2 VMT/Capita, based on the county-wide average. • Office and Other Employment Projects: exceeding 14.2 Work VMT/Employee, based on the county-wide average.
• Retail and Other Customer Projects: An increase in total region wide (county) VMT.

3.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
The project is primarily a retail project consisting of a fast-food restaurant.

3.1 RETAIL USE ASSESSMENT

3.1.1 Screening Criteria Assessment
The project is proposing the constructi on of 3,068 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive through along Highway 111 just east of Clinton Street in the City of Indio.

Screening Criteria Local-Serving Retail
The proposed retail would not only serve the other uses on the site but the local community as well. The guidelines state that to be considered local retail, no single store on-site exceeds 50,000 square feet. As stated previously, the entire project site provides approximately 3,068 square feet fast-food restaurant that is considered local retail ; therefore, the project could qualify for the Local-Serving Retail screening.

3.1.2 VMT Analysis
As shown in Table 1, the project’s retail component would qualify for screening for being a small project. For this reason , the project’s retail component would be presumed to be less than significant for VMT impacts.

4 Guidelines, Figure 4 Threshold Basisskjf
5 Guidelines, Figure 6 VMT Threshold of Significance

Page 171 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 344 of 486 Wendy’s Restaurant VMT

5 3.2 VMT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION
The proposed project is presumed to be less than significant for VMT impacts due to the proposed uses meeting at least one of the County’s screening criteria outlined in Section 2.1. The project’s VMT impact assessment for the proposed uses is summarized in Table 1:

Table 1: Summary of VMT Impacts
Land Use
Type Proposed Uses Impact Commentary
Retail 3,068 SF Fast-Food
Restaurant
Presumed to be less than
significant
Meets County’s Screening Criteria for Local-
Serving Retail.

Page 172 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 345 of 486

Appendix B
Noise Impact Study, MD Acoustics

Page 173 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 346 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA
Prepared for:

The Altum Group
Rich Malacoff, AICP
72140 Magnesia Dalls, Suite 1
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Prepared by:

MD Acoustics, LLC
Mike Dickerson, INCE
Robert Pearson
1197 Los Angeles Ave, Ste C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Date: 9/6/2022

Page 174 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 347 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA Table of Contents

MD Acoustics, LLC ii
JN: 07412201_Report.docx

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Findings and Conclusions 1

2.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 2

2.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives 2

2.2 Site Location and Study Area 2

2.3 Proposed Project Description 2

3.0 Fundamentals of Noise ................................................................................................................. 5

3.1 Sound, Noise and Acoustics 5

3.2 Frequency and Hertz 5

3.3 Sound Pressure Levels and Decibels 5

3.4 Addition of Decibels 5

3.5 Human Response to Changes in Noise Levels 6

3.6 Noise Descriptors 6

3.7 Traffic Noise Prediction 7

3.8 Sound Propagation 7

4.0 Regulatory Setting ......................................................................................................................... 9

4.1 Federal Regulations 9

4.2 State Regulations 9

4.3 City of Indio Noise Regulations 11

5.0 Study Method and Procedure ..................................................................................................... 13

5.1 Noise Measurement Procedure and Criteria 13

5.2 Short-Term Noise Measurement Locations 13

5.3 Stationary Noise Modeling 13

6.0 Existing Noise Environment ......................................................................................................... 15

6.2 Short-Term Noise Measurement Results 15

7.0 Future Noise Environment Impacts and Mitigation .................................................................... 16

7.1 Stationary Source Noise 16

7.1.1 Noise Impacts to Off-Site Receptors Due to Stationary Sources 16

8.0 Construction Noise Impact .......................................................................................................... 19

8.1 Construction Noise 19

8.2 Construction Vibration 20

9.0 References .................................................................................................................................. 22

Page 175 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 348 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA Table of Contents

MD Acoustics, LLC iii
JN: 07412201_Report.docx

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Field Measurement Data .................................................................................................. 1 Appendix B: SoundPLAN Input/Outputs ............................................................................................... 2 Appendix C: Referenced Drive Thru Noise Level ................................................................................... 3

LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Location Map .................................................................................................................... 3 Exhibit B: Site Plan ............................................................................................................................ 4 Exhibit C: Typical A-Weighted Noise Levels ...................................................................................... 5 Exhibit D: Land Use Compatibility Guidelines ................................................................................. 10 Exhibit E: Operational Worst-Case Noise Level Contours ............................................................... 18

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Short-Term Noise Measurement Data (dBA)1 ........................................................................... 15 Table 2: Worst-Case Predicted Operational Noise Levels (dBA) .............................................................. 17 Table 3: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels ........................................................................... 19 Table 4: Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ......................................................... 20 Table 5: Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ................................................................ 21

Page 176 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 349 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA Executive Summary

1 1.0 Executive Summary
This report has been prepared to provide the calculated noise projections for the proposed Wendy’s Drive Thru project located along Highway 111 between Clinton Street and Las Palmas Road in the City of Indio, CA. All noise projections were compared to the Noise Element as contained in the City of Indio General Plan.

1.1 Findings and Conclusions
On July 16, 2020, MD performed two baseline noise measurements at the proposed project site. T he existing noise level ranges from 51 to 73 dBA, Leq, depending on the proximity to Highway 111 during operational hours (7 am to 10 pm) . MD has provided updated noise projections based on the project design.

This s tudy compar es the P roject’s operational noise levels to two (2) different noise a ssessment scenarios: 1) Project only operational noise level projections, 2) Project plus ambient noise level projections.

The project as designed (see project design features in Section 7.2 of the report) meets the City’s noise ordinance and policies within the General Plan Noise Element. N o noise mitigation measures are required.

Page 177 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 350 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA Introduction

2 2.0 Introduction

2.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives
The purpose of this noise impact study is to evaluate the potential noise impacts for the project study area and to recommend noise mitigation measures, if necessary, to minimize the potential noise impacts. This assessment was conducted and compared to poten tially applicable noise standards set - forth by the State and/or Local agencies. Consistent with the City’s Noise Guidelines, the project must demonstrate compliance to the applicable noise zoning ordinance and sound attenuation requirements.

The following is provided in this report:
• A description of the study area and the proposed project • Information regarding the fundamentals of noise
• A description of the local noise guidelines and standards • An evaluation of the existing ambient noise environment • An analys is of stationary noise impact (e.g. blowers and vacuums) from the project site to adjacent land uses

2.2 Site Location and Study Area
The project site is located along Hwy 111 between Dr Carreon Boulevard and Las Palmas Road in the City of Indio, C alifornia, as shown in Exhibit A. The site is currently zoned as Community Commercial use by the City of Indio. The Project is bordered by commercial uses to the north and south, Hwy 111 to the northwest, and vacant land to the east.

2.3 Proposed Project Description
The Project proposes the construction of a 3,070 square foot fast-food restaurant on 0.57 acres. Exhibit B demonstrates the site plan for the project.

Construction activities within the Project area will consist of demolition, grading, building, paving, and architectural coating.

Page 178 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 351 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA Introduction
3 Exhibit A
Location Map
Site

Page 179 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 352 of 486 Exhibit B
Site Plan
4 Introduction
Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA

Page 180 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ...Page 353 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA Fundamentals of Noise

5 3.0 Fundamentals of Noise
This section of the report provides basic information about noise and presents some of the terms used within the report.

3.1 Sound, Noise and Acoustics
Sound is a disturbance created by a moving or vibrating source and is capable of being detected by the hearing organs. Sound may be thought of as mechanical energy of a moving object transmitted by pressure waves through a medium to a human ear. For traffic, or stationary noise, the medium of concern is air. Noise is defined as sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or unwanted.

3.2 Frequency and Hertz
A continuous sound is described by its frequency
(pitch) and its amplitude (loudness). Frequency
relates to the number of pressure oscillations per
second. Low -frequency sounds are low in pitch
(bass sounding) and high-frequency sounds are high
in pitch (squeak). These oscillations per second
(cycles) are commonly referred to as Hertz (Hz). The
human ear can hear from the bass pitch starting out
at 20 Hz all the way to the high pitch of 20,000 Hz.

3.3 Sound Pressure Levels and Decibels
The amplitude of a sound determines it loudness.

The loudness of sound increases or decreases as
the amplitude increases or decreases. Sound
pressure amplitude is measure in units of micro -
Newton per square inch meter (N/m2), also called
micro-Pascal (µPa). One µPa is approximately one
hundred billionths (0.00000000001) of normal
atmospheric pressure. Sound pressure level (SPL or
Lp) is used to describe in logarithmic units the ratio
of actual sound pressures to a reference pressure
squared. These units are called decibels abbreviated dB. Exhibit C illustrates references sound levels for different noise sources.

3.4 Addition of Decibels
Because decibels are on a logarithmic scale, sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by simple plus or minus addition. When two sounds or equal SPL are combined, they will produce an SPL 3 dB greater than the original single SPL. In other words, sound energy must be doubled to produce a 3 dB increase. If two sounds differ by approximately 10 dB, the higher sound level is the predominant sound.

Exhibit C: Typical A-Weighted Noise Levels

Page 181 of 313 ends

AGENDA ITEM #10.1
Resolution No. 10360, conditionally approving the Wendy's Drive-Through ... Page 354 of 486 Wendy’s Drive Thru
Noise Impact Study
City of Indio, CA Fundamentals of Noise

6 3.5 Human Response to Changes in Noise Levels
In ge neral, the healthy human ear is most sensitive to sounds between 1,000 Hz and 5,000 Hz, (A - weighted scale) and it perceives a sound within that range as being more intense than a sound with a higher or lower frequency with the same magnitude. For purposes of this report as well as with most environmental documents, the A -scale weighting is typically reported in terms of A -weighted decibel (dBA). Typically, the human ear can barely perceive the change in noise level of 3 dB. A change in 5 dB is readily perc eptible, and a change in 10 dB is perceived as being twice or half as loud. As previously discussed, a doubling of sound energy results in a 3 dB increase in sound, which means that a doubling of sound energy (e.g. doubling the volume of traffic on a highw ay) would result in a barely perceptible change in sound level.

3.6 Noise Descriptors
Noise in our daily environment fluctuates over time. Some noise levels occur in regular patterns, others are random. Some noise levels are constant while others are spora dic. Noise descriptors were created to describe the different time-varying noise levels.

A-Weighted Sound Level: The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A -weighted filter network. The A -weighting filter de -emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear. A numerical method of rating human judgment of loudness.

Ambient Noise Level: The composite of noise from all sources, near and far. In this context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location.

Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24- hour day, obtained after addition of five (5) decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 to 10:00 PM and after addition of ten (10) decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 AM and after 10:00 PM.

Decibel (dB): A unit for measuring the amplitude of a sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 micro - pascals.
dB(A): A-weighted sound level (see definition above).

Equivalent Sound Level (LEQ): The sound level corresponding to a steady noise level over a given sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual time varying noise level. The energy average noise level during the sample period.

Habitable Room: Any room meeting the requirements of the Uniform Building Code or other applicable regulations which is intended to be used for sleeping, living, cooking or dining purposes, excluding such enclosed spaces as closets, pantries, bath or toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries, unfinished attics, foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility rooms and similar spaces.

Page 182 of 313 ends

Indio City CouncilJune 7, 2023

Indio City Council
June 7, 2023