However, as described in Section 4.4.1.5 and in the Jurisdictional Waters Delineation provided in the FEIR, the West Riverside Canal could be defined as a waters of the U.S. and waters of the State. The proposed project would construct a new West Riverside Canal crossing at Alta Street and Canal Street and improve the existing crossing at 28th Street and Canal Street. Construction of these crossings would directly impact a total of approximately 0.06 acres of potential riparian/riverine habitat and could create indirect effects to water quality from stormwater runoff from the project site. As a result of the proposed impacts to potential riparian/riverine habitat, the proposed project would implement MM-BIO-2, which requires at least 1:1 mitigation ratio or payment of an in-lieu fee for the 0.06 acres of impacts to riparian/riverine habitat. Additionally, the proposed project would mitigate potential indirect effects through implementation of MM-BIO-3, which requires implementation of NPDES and best management practices to ensure that any stormwater runoff from the project site during construction and operation does not substantially alter the stormwater quantity or quality that is discharged to adjacent stormwater channels. Furthermore, the proposed project may be required to obtain a CDFW Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit that would require measures to reduce potential impacts to the West Riverside Canal and any downstream riparian habitat. Therefore, with implementation of MM-BIO-2, MM-BIO-3, and all requirements from any applicable permits, impacts are considered to be less than significant. 4.4.C The project site does not support any sensitive habitats within the project boundary and would not impact any wetlands on the project site. However, the West Riverside Canal borders the project site along its eastern and southern boundaries. As previously described, the West Riverside Canal may be considered a water of the U.S. The proposed project would construct a new road crossing and improve an existing crossing of the West Riverside Canal that would result in approximately 0.06 acres of impacts to the Canal. The proposed project would implement MM-BIO-2, which requires at least 1:1 mitigation ratio or payment of an in lieu fee for the 0.06 acres of impacts to riparian/riverine habitat. Additionally, the proposed project would mitigate potential indirect effects through implementation of MM-BIO-3, which requires implementation of NPDES and best management practices to ensure that any stormwater runoff from the project site during construction and operation does not substantially alter the stormwater quantity or quality that is discharged to adjacent stormwater channels. If the Canal is determined to be a water of the U.S. it would be required to obtain a Section 404 permit under the Clean Water Act. This permit would likely include additional requirements that would further reduce impacts to any wetlands. With implementation of the above measures and requirements of a Section 404 permit impacts to federally protected wetlands would be less than significant.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.4.D There are no wildlife corridors present on-site and the proposed project is not expected to impede regional wildlife movement or impact any MSHCP-designated corridors or habitat linkages. As such, the proposed project is not expected to have a substantial impact to habitat fragmentation and regional wildlife movement, and impacts would be less than significant. 4.4.E The proposed project would be consistent with all relevant goals and policies within the General Plan, the Jurupa Area Plan, and the Western Riverside County MSHCP regarding the preservation and protection of biological resources. 4.4.F The probability of MSHCP identified species to inhabit the project site is considered low due to past and existing disturbances on-site. With implementation of MM-BIO-1, that would require pre-construction nesting bird, raptor, and burrowing owl surveys, the proposed project would not be clear of these species before construction and would not conflict with the MSHCP. Furthermore, PPP 4.4-1 would require payment of mitigation fees consistent with the MSHCP and PPP 4.4-2 would require the proposed project to comply with applicable measures in the MSHCP. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant. 4.4.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.4.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.4-1 The Project is required to pay mitigation fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MHSCP) as required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.80. PPP 4.4-2 The project is required to comply with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Plan. 4.4.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, the following mitigation measures were identified. MM-BIO-1 Prior to the start of construction, pre-construction surveys for nesting birds, raptors, and burrowing owls shall be conducted in accordance with State and federal guidelines and requirements. These surveys will determine the presence of any sensitive species and if any sensitive species are present, measures consistent with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan as well as applicable State and federal regulations will be MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
implemented to ensure that any sensitive species will not be impacted during construction. These measures may include: Scheduling site clearing activities outside of bird breeding season for nesting birds. Payment of Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees and any other applicable State and federal fees. MM-BIO-2 Prior to constructing new or improving existing West Riverside Canal crossings the project applicant shall provide at a minimum a 1:1 ratio, or as otherwise determined by the resources agencies during permitting, of habitat mitigation or an approved in lieu fee for the disturbance of 0.06 acres of riparian habitat. MM-BIO-3 Prior to the construction or improvement of any crossings involving the West Riverside Canal, any applicable measures from the MSHCP Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines shall be implemented to ensure all indirect impacts to off-site drainage channels and associated riparian/riverine habitats downstream will be minimized to the greatest extent possible. Additionally, all applicable best management practices and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System requirements shall be implemented to ensure that the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff from the project site is not altered in any significant way when compared to existing conditions. Stormwater systems for the proposed project shall be designed to prevent toxins, chemicals, petroleum products, and other toxic substances from entering any adjacent drainage channels that could potentially impact downstream riparian/riverine habitats. 4.4.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis Development of the Proposed Project will have no new impact on biological resources. The area affected by the extension of A" Street undergoes routine weed abatement (i.e., disking) resulting in low growing vegetation and heavily disturbed soils. The West Riverside Canal would not be impacted by the Modified Project. However, the Modified Project includes the extension of A Street to La Canada that was not anticipated in the original biological Burrowing Owl (BUOW) Focused Survey for the Approved Project. A Focused BUOW Survey was conducted by Michael Baker International with results in a report dated September 7, 2021. Based on the results of the focused surveys, no BUOWs sign, occupied burrows, or remnant burrows were observed within the survey area. Therefore, BUOW is presumed to be absent from the survey area and project-related activities are not expected to result in any direct or indirect impacts to BUOWs or occupied burrows. Although BUOWs were not observed during the focused surveys, the survey area does contain suitable burrows and habitat that could become occupied by BUOW prior to implementation of the Modified Project. Therefore, Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-1 per the certified EIR requiring a 30-day pre-construction clearance survey would be required to reconfirm the absence of BUOWs. Biological Resources impacts would remain less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-BIO-1.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to biological resources that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.5 Cultural Resources New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 4.5.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions Cultural Resources to be less than significant and screened out and not discussed in the FEIR. The conclusions included are from the IS/MND. Impacts A and B were found to be potentially significant and the conclusions in the FEIR are discussed here. 4.5.A Five historic-period archaeological sites, 33-005044, 33-013240, 33- 005042, 33-017539, and 33024816, were previously recorded or found within the project site. The five historic archaeological resources consisted of the West Riverside Canal, the Union Pacific Railroad Crestmore spur, a concrete reservoir found in a previous study, and two building structural remnant sites, one of which was identified in a previous study and the other found during a survey of the project site conducted as part of the Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report. No other historical archaeological resources were encountered on the project site, and all previous buildings on the project site were removed by 2010. Historical research has identified no persons or events of recognized historical significance in association with these sites, nor do the features recorded at the sites demonstrate any particular merits in terms of design, construction, engineering, or MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
aesthetics. Therefore, the historic archaeological resources identified on the project site would not be eligible for listing in the CRHR. Based on these considerations, none of the historical archaeological resources identified within the project site meet definition of a significant historical resource. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 4.5.B There were no cultural resources present on the project site that qualify as an archaeological resource as defined by CEQA, and no other potential archaeological resources were encountered during the historical and archaeological surveys. However, there is still the potential to disturb a previously unidentified archeological resource on the project site that could be significant. As such, the proposed project would implement MM-CUL-1 that would require archeological monitoring and MM-CUL-2 that would implement appropriate measures for the treatment of archeological resources if they are discovered on the project site. With implementation of these mitigation measures impacts would be less than significant. 4.5.C There is the potential for the proposed project to result in impacts to previously undiscovered paleontological resources during earth-moving activities. Therefore, the proposed project would implement MM-CUL-4, which involves periodic monitoring during earth-moving activities within the top 5 feet of sediments, and continuous monitoring if Pleistocene alluvial sediments are encountered at shallower depths. This would ensure that in the areas where there is the potential for significant undiscovered paleontological resources, monitors would be present to identify such resources and provide the proper methodologies for preserving any significant paleontological resources uncovered during construction of the proposed project. Implementation of MM-CUL-4 would reduce impacts to less than significant. 4.5.D The project site is not currently, nor has it historically been used as a cemetery; thus, there is a low probability of encountering human remains during ground-disturbing activities. As required by PPP 4.5-1, any unanticipated discoveries of human remains require handling in accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, which states that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction, construction activity shall be halted and the area shall be protected until consultation and treatment can occur as prescribed by law. With implementation of PPP 4.5-1, impacts to human remains would be less than significant. 4.5.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.5.3 Applicable General Plan Policies MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
PPP 4.5-1 The project is required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code §7050.5 as well as California Public Resources Code §5097, et. seq. 4.5.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, the following mitigation measures were identified. MM CUL-1: Archaeological Monitoring. A qualified archaeologist (the shall be retained by the developer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Prior to the commencement of any earth-moving activities on-site, the applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor and a qualified archaeologist, subject to the review and approval of the Building Official, or designee. The Native American monitor and qualified archaeologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and be on-site during all ground disturbing activities. At least 30 days prior to issuance of grading permits for each phase of the project, separate agreements between the applicant and the qualified archaeologist and the applicant and a Native American Monitor shall be developed regarding prehistoric cultural resources and shall identify any monitoring requirements and treatment of cultural resources so as to meet both the requirements of CEQA and those of the Tribe. The agreements shall also address roles and responsibilities of the Native American Monitor and the archaeologist. The Native American Monitor agreement shall detail treatment and final disposition of any Native American cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. In compliance with MM-CUL-2 and MM-CUL-4, discovery and treatment of human remains shall occur in compliance with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. MM CUL-2: Archeological Treatment Plan. If a significant archaeological resource(s) is discovered on the property, ground disturbing activities shall be suspended 100 feet around the resource(s). The Project Archaeological monitor, the Project Proponent, and the City Planning Department shall confer regarding mitigation of the discovered resource(s). A treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented by the archaeologist to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall contain a research design and data recovery program necessary to document the size and content of the discovery such that the resource(s) can be evaluated for significance under CEQA criteria. The research design shall list the sampling procedures appropriate to exhaust the research potential of the archaeological resource(s) in accordance with current professional archaeology standards (typically this sampling level is two (2) to five (5) percent of the volume of the cultural deposit). At the completion of the laboratory analysis, any recovered archaeological resources shall be processed and curated according to current professional repository standards. The collections and associated records shall be donated to an appropriate curation facility. A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department and the Eastern Information Center. MM-CUL-3: Native American Monitoring, Treatment of Discoveries, and Disposition of Discoveries.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall contact the consulting Native American Tribe(s) that have requested monitoring through consultation with the City during the AB 52 process. The applicant shall coordinate with the Tribe(s) to develop a Tribal Monitoring Agreement(s). A copy of the agreement shall be provided to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Treatment of Discoveries: If a s ignificant tribal cultural resource is discovered on the property, ground disturbing activities shall be suspended 100 feet around the resource(s). A representative of the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the Project Proponent, and the City Planning Department shall confer regarding mitigation of the discovered resource(s). A treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented to protect the identified tribal cultural resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall contain a research design and data recovery program necessary to document the size and content of the discovery such that the resource(s) can be evaluated for significance under CEQA criteria. The research design shall list the sampling procedures appropriate to exhaust the research potential of the tribal cultural resources in accordance with current professional archaeology standards. The treatment plan shall require monitoring by the appropriate Native American Tribe(s) during data recovery and shall require that all recovered artifacts undergo basic field analysis and documentation or laboratory analysis, whichever is appropriate. At the completion of the basic field analysis and documentation or laboratory analysis, any recovered tribal cultural resources shall be processed and curated according to current professional repository standards. The collections and associated records shall be donated to an appropriate curation facility, or, the artifacts may be delivered to the appropriate Native American Tribe(s) if that is recommended by the City of Jurupa Valley. A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department, the Eastern Information Center, and the appropriate Native American Tribe. Disposition of Discoveries: In the event that Native American cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during the course of grading for this project the following procedures will be carried out for treatment and disposition of the discoveries: The landowner(s) shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods, and all archaeological artifacts and non-human remains as part of the required mitigation for impacts to tribal cultural resources. The applicant shall relinquish the artifacts through one or more of the following methods and provide the Jurupa Valley Planning Department with evidence of same: A fully executed reburial agreement with the appropriate culturally affiliated Native American tribes or bands. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all cataloguing and basic recordation have been completed.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
A curation agreement with an appropriate qualified repository within Riverside County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and therefore would be professionally curated and made available to other archaeologists/researchers for further study. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within Riverside County, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. If more than one Native American Group is involved with the project and cannot come to an agreement as to the disposition of cultural materials, they shall be curated at the Western Science Center by default. Should reburial of collected cultural items be preferred, it shall not occur until after the Phase IV monitoring report has been submitted to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department. Should curation be preferred, the developer/permit applicant is responsible for all costs and the repository and curation method shall be described in the Phase IV monitoring report. MM-CUL-4 Paleontological Monitoring/Findings: Prior to commencement of any grading activity on-site, the applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist, subject to the review and approval of -conducted by the qualified paleontologist during earth-moving activities within the top 5 feet of sediments below the current ground surface. When ground disturbance exceeds a depth of 5 feet, or if Pleistocene alluvial sediments are encountered at shallower depths, continuous monitoring shall occur. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage paleontological remains as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays, and shall collect samples of sediments that are likely to contain small fossils. However, the monitor shall have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. The sediment samples collected during the field procedures shall be processed for small fossil remains, and the recovered specimens shall be prepared for proper identification and permanent curation at a repository with permanent retrievable storage. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens, shall be prepared upon completion of the work outlined above. Approval of the report and inventory by the City of Jurupa Valley shall signify completion of the mitigation program. 4.5.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The area affected by the extension of 'A" Street undergoes routine weed abatement (i.e., disking) resulting in low growing vegetation and heavily disturbed soils. the area for the expansion of A Street is vacant and in similar physical condition. The Project does not propose any changes that would impact Cultural Resources than what was originally evaluated under the Approved Project. However, there is still the potential to disturb a previously unidentified archeological, Tribal Cultural, and paleontological resources on the project site that could be significant. As such, the Modified Project would implement MM-CUL-1 that would require archeological monitoring and MM-CUL-2 that would MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
implement appropriate measures for the treatment of archeological resources if they were discovered on the Modified Project site. Additionally, MM-CUL-3 would be implemented to require Native American Monitoring and MM-CUL-4 involving periodic monitoring during earth moving activities. Cultural Resource impacts would remain less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-CUL-1 through MM-CUL-4. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to cultural resources that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.6 Geology and Soils New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismicrelated ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 181B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating direct or indirect substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 4.6.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.6.A To minimize potential damage to the proposed project structures caused by seismic hazards, all construction would comply with the latest CBC standards as required by PPP 4.6-1. Implementation of the CBC standards, including provisions for seismic building designs, would further reduce impacts associated with seismic ground shaking and seismic-related ground failure. Therefore, impacts from the exposure of people or property to potential substantial adverse effects from earthquake, seismic ground shaking, as well as seismic-related ground failure, or landslides would be less than significant. 4.6.B Pursuant to PPP 4.6-3 a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan would be prepared before construction begins, and a Water Quality Management Plan is required to address post-construction soil erosion. These plans would be used to identify best management practices (e.g., bioretention basins/flow-through planters, landscape design, silt screening, fiber filtration rolls) to minimize off-site sediment transport and erosion for the duration of the proposed project. Grading would be designed to maintain existing drainage flow, and slopes would be planted, drained, and maintained to reduce erosion potential. With compliance with the Geotechnical Report recommendations per PDF-GEO-1 would reduce erosion potential from backcuts and grading, steep slopes, and would direct drainage on the project site in a manner that would reduce siltation and erosion runoff. Additionally, incorporation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan best management practices per PPP 4.6-3 would implement methods to direct and detain stormwater on the project site and reduce loss of topsoil via stormwater runoff. Implementation of these measures would reduce soil erosion and the loss of topsoil during construction and operation of the proposed project would be less than significant. 4.6.C As indicated in the Geotechnical Report, the potential for earthquake-induced liquefaction and lateral spreading beneath the proposed structures is considered very low to remote due to the recommended compacted fill, relatively low groundwater level, and dense nature of the deeper on-site earth materials. Furthermore, as part of PPP 4.6-2 steep slopes would be required to be considered safe in a slope stability report that would also include recommendations for erosion control and stabilizing sediments on steep slopes that would reduce unstable soils. These measures in addition to implementation of current CBC standards, including provisions for seismic building designs, would ensure that proposed project impacts associated with liquefaction and lateral spreading would be less than significant. 4.6.D The Geotechnical Report indicated that on-site earth materials exhibit a very low to low expansion potential as classified in accordance with CBC Section 1803.5. Project adherence to expansive soil recommendations outlined within the Geotechnical Report per PDF-GEO-1, as well as PPP 4.6-1 that requires compliance with standards and requirements contained in the CBC for the design of the MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
proposed buildings, would ensure that impacts related to expansive soil would be less than significant. 4.6.E The proposed project would not include use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Wastewater treatment and collection services would be provided to the project site by the Rubidoux Community Services District. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur. 4.6.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.6.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.6-1 The project is required to comply with the California Building Standards Code and City of Jurupa Valley Building Code to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards and strong seismic ground shaking. PPP 4.6-2 As required by Section 5.1.A.18.a(1)(a) of Ordinance No. 460 (County of Riverside 2014), slope ratios steeper than 2:1 and slope heights in excess of 10 feet vertically shall be recommended to be safe in a slope stability report written by either a registered soil engineer or a registered engineering geologist. The slope stability report must also include recommendations for erosion control and landscaping of the proposed grading. PPP 4.6-3 As required by the City of Jurupa National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit, prior to grading permit issuance, the project proponent shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan will include best management practices such as use of fiber rolls, detention basins, and other methods to reduce soil erosion from stormwater runoff. 4.6.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures MM-GEO-1: Clearing of Loose and Precarious Rock. To reduce potential risks associated with falling rocks the applicant shall: a. Prior to beginning grading, the areas encompassed by Assessor Parcel Numbers 178-120-001 and 178-060-002 (Open Space Lots 194 and 195 and terminus of proposed Street), the descending slope along the northern property line in this area shall be cordoned off to ensure that no unauthorized personnel will be MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
on site during clearing operations. All operations shall be executed in accordance with OSHA requirements. Experienced professionals will be contracted to clear any loose or precarious rocks from on-site descending area of the slope. This will involve simply pushing off rocks at the cliffs edge using hand tools, and use of construction equipment. c. Following clearing efforts at the top of the cliff, the dislodged material shall be treated like the other oversized materials onsite and removed with the same procedures and methods. 4.6.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The FEIR identified that there is a possibility of rockfall associated with an approximately 800-foot-high slope adjacent to the northern boundary of the Project site that could have a potentially significant impact by exposing people and structures to substantial adverse effects from falling rocks. As a result, the Approved Project was required to incorporate Mitigation Measure GEO-1, which would safely remove any loose rocks on the natural slope that could result in falling rocks onto the Project site. With incorporation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, potential impacts from falling rocks would be less than significant. The area affected by the extension of "A" Street is located approximately 600 feet southwest of the 800-foot slope. In addition, the Project site remains in the same physical condition as it did in 2016 when the EIR for the Approved Project certified. The Modified Project does not propose any changes that would impact Geology and Soils than what was originally evaluated under the Approved Project. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to geology and soils that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 4.7.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.7.A The net GHG emissions associated with buildout of the proposed project with PPPs and PDFs would not exceed the SCAQMD efficiency threshold of 4.8 MT CO2E per service population per year. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from GHG emissions. 4.7.B The proposed project would not actively interfere with any future City- mandated, state-mandated, or federally mandated retrofit obligations enacted or promulgated to legally require residential development city-wide, state-wide, or nation-wide to assist in meeting state-adopted GHG emissions reduction targets. Therefore, the proposed than significant and the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. 4.7.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.7.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.7-1 Prior to issuance of the first residential building permit, the Project Applicant shall submit energy usage calculations in the form of a Title 24 Compliance Report to the City of Jurupa Valley Building & Safety Department showing that the Project will be constructed in compliance with the most recently adopted edition of the applicable California Building Code Title 24 requirements. PPP 4.7-2 Prior to building permit issuance, the City shall verify that the following note is included on building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the note and permit inspection by City of Jurupa Valley staff or their designee to ensure compliance. The note also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. All installed appliances shall comply with California Code of Regulations Title 20 (Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards), which establishes energy efficiency requirements for appliances MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the note and permit inspection by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to ensure compliance. The note also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. PPP 4.7-3 Prior to the approval of landscaping plans, the City shall verify that all landscaping will comply with City Ordinance No. 2015-17, Efficient Landscape Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with approved landscaping plans. 4.7.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to greenhouse gas emissions will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.7.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The con(GHG) emissions. For GHG emission analysis purposes, GHG construction emissions are amortized over a 30-year period. As such, construction of the roadway will result in a negligible amount of GHG emissions. GHG emissions caused by vehicle trips generated by the Emerald Ridge Project were Street will not increase GHG emissions above what was analyzed in the FEIR. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? 4.8.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.8.A The proposed project would comply with PPP 4.8-1, requiring adherence to applicable laws and regulations regarding hazardous materials, which would further reduce the potential for risk of hazard to the public and environment. Therefore, impacts related to the construction and operational phases of the proposed project would be less than significant. 4.8.B During the site reconnaissance surveys conducted for the Phase I ESAs, Earth Strata found no evidence of hazardous material releases within the project site. However, with implementation of MM-HAZ-1, which requires analysis and proper disposal of suspect soils during excavation through the collection, transportation, and disposal means established in applicable hazardous waste regulations, would reduce the potential upset release of any hazardous chemicals found on the project site. Therefore, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. 4.8.C The nearest school, Rubidoux High School, is located approximately 0.8 mile from the project site. Therefore, the project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials within 0.25 mile of a school. No impact would occur.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.8.D As disclosed in the Phase I ESAs, the project site is not located on any hazardous materials list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, or other hazardous sites list compiled by federal, state, or local agencies. No impact would occur. 4.8.E The Project site is not located within an airport compatibility zone. 4.8.F During construction, equipment may require encroachment into the public right-of-way; however, the proposed project would be required to maintain adequate emergency access during construction. During operation, the proposed project would not impede emergency access, as it would be required to comply with applicable fire codes and roadway design standards. No portion of the proposed project would impede nearby major arterial roadways/highways that serve as designated evacuation routes in the Emergency Operations Plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 4.8.G The project site is located within vacant land surrounding by State Route 60, existing residential land uses, and Rattlesnake Mountain. According to the CAL FIRE map for Fire Hazard Severity Zone in State Responsibility Areas, a portion of the project site is located within and adjacent to a high fire hazard zone (CAL FIRE 2007). Therefore, the project site is located in an area where wildfire is considered to have a high potential to occur. However, in accordance with PPP 4.14- 1, the proposed project would comply with all required and applicable fire codes, ordinances, and standards to minimize potential impacts to the proposed project, including the use of fuel modification where necessary. Adequate project design and compliance with fire standards would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. 4.8.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.8.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.8-1 The project is subject to all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding hazardous materials, including requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. PPP 4.8-2 The project applicant shall comply with all applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire prevention and suppression measures relating to water improvement plans, fire hydrants, MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire access, access gates, combustible construction, water availability, and fire sprinkler systems. 4.8.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, the following mitigation measures were identified. MM-HAZ-1. Upon completion of grading plans and prior to the start of any construction or earth-moving activities, the project applicant or its designee shall ensure that the grading plans contain a suspect-soil removal plan due to past agricultural uses, subject to approval by the City of Jurupa Valley Engineering Department. The soil removal plan shall include, at minimum, the following: Information regarding the identification of soils suspect of contamination (e.g., staining or abnormal coloring) Evaluation and, if necessary, remediation steps such as collecting and proper disposal of the material in an approved hazardous waste landfill according to all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. If any contaminated or affected soils are discovered that meet or exceed an established hazardous materials threshold, methods of proper collection, transport, and disposal at a permitted disposal facility by a licensed waste hauler. 4.8.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The FEIR identified a potential impact that due to the potential historic use of pesticides that are currently considered a health risk and no longer in use, hazardous substances may potentially exist in surface and near-surface soils. During excavation required for construction of the proposed Project, pesticides from previous agricultural operations may be released into the environment, and Mitigation Measure MM-HAZ-1 would reduce the impact to less than significant. The Modified Project is subject to MM-HAZ-1. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? 4.9.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions Hydrology and Water Quality to be less than significant and screened out and not discussed in the FEIR. The conclusions included are from the IS/MND. 4.9.A Construction of the proposed project would likely result in more than 1 acre of land disturbance, and, therefore, the proposed project would be required to obtain an NPDES permit per PPP 4.9-1, as well as prepare and implement a SWPPP in accordance with the Statewide Construction General Permit that would implement best management practices to reduce stormwater pollutants such as use of filter rolls and detention basins per PPP 4.9-2. A SWPPP would require implementation of water quality BMPs to ensure that water quality standards are met and that stormwater runoff from the construction work areas do not cause degradation of water quality in receiving water bodies. Additionally, PPP 4.9-3 would ensure compliance with the water quality discharge MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
impact development techniques and bioretention of stormwater on the project site, that are intended to minimize adverse effects to water quality and must be approved by the City prior to the start of construction. As such, the proposed project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during construction, and impacts would be less than significant. PPP 4.9-4 would require that the proposed project comply with Chapter 6.10, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code that would institute the use of BMPs, such as detention ponds, porous pavement, and landscaping used to filter pollutants from stormwater runoff from the project site. Implementation of PPP 4.9-4 would ensure that the proposed project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during operation, and impacts would be less than significant. 4.9.B The Rubidoux Community Service District provided a will-serve letter indicating its availability to provide potable water to the proposed project (refer to Section 4.17, Utilities and Service Systems). Therefore, the proposed project is accounted for by the Rubidoux Community Service District, and the proposed project would not contribute to the lowering of the local groundwater table. The proposed project would convert areas of the project site from having a pervious land cover to having an impervious land cover. The additional areas of impervious land cover would result in less stormwater infiltration. However, the proposed stormwater drainage system would direct flow to three detention basins, and ultimately to the existing off-site Rubidoux Basin owned by the Riverside County Flood Control District. These basins would allow for infiltration of stormwater runoff generated at the project site. Furthermore, stormwater runoff on the southern portion of the project site would be captured and filtered through Filterra bioretention units that treat and remove pollutants. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.9.C The project would not substantially alter the drainage pattern of the site such that erosion would substantially increase. Impacts would be less than significant. Flooding and sedimentation impacts caused by on- or off-site flooding will be less than significant with implementation of existing City standards. Impacts related to polluted urban runoff and storm drain capacity will be less than significant with implementation of existing standards and regulations. Impacts due to the placement of housing within 100-year flood zones will be less than significant.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Impacts related to the diversion of floodwaters will be less than significant with implementation of existing City regulations. Impacts related to inundation due to dam or levee failure will be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. 4.9.D Impacts associated with mudflows, tsunami, and seiche will be less than significant with implementation of existing City regulations 4.9.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.9.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.9-1 Prior to grading permit issuance, the project proponent shall obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit from the State Resources Control Board. Evidence that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit has been issued shall be provided to the City of Jurupa Valley prior to issuance of the first grading permit. PPP 4.9-2 Prior to grading permit issuance, the project proponent shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. PPP 4.9-3 During construction, project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the Plan, and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. PPP 4.9-4 The project shall be in compliance with Chapter 6.10, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. PPP 4.9-5 The project shall be in compliance with City of Jurupa Valley Ordinance 460, Section 11.3, Flood Control and Tract Drainage. 4.9.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to hydrology and water quality were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to hydrology and water quality will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.9.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis Based on the Hydrology Study for Tract Map No. 36947 City of Jurupa Valley, Proactive Engineering, September 16, 2021, the the onsite and tributary offsite flows to the existing basin located just north of the SR-60 Freeway between Avalon Street and Rubidoux Boulevard, which is a regional flood control basin. Increased runoff mitigation is not required for the Modified Project since this regional basin has been designed for the ultimate buildout of the tributary watershed. All onsite and offsite flows from the Modified Project site will discharge into the existing basin. Based on the preceding analyses, the proposed storm drain infrastructure can convey the tributary onsite and offsite flows to the existing downstream regional basin. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, BMPs and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.10 Land Use and Planning New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? 4.10.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.10.A Construction of this development would not result in the demolition of any existing buildings; the displacement of any businesses or residences; or any substantial alterations to any routes of travel, including pedestrian, transit, or automobile routes. The proposed project would not inhibit movement between any local population MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
centers and any community resources such as commercial centers, public parks, or transit centers. Additionally, implementation of the proposed project would be consistent with and provide connections to surrounding residential development; therefore, the proposed project would not physically divide an established community. As such, impacts would be less than significant. 4.10.B Although the proposed project would be inconsistent with the existing General Plan land use and Zoning designations for the project site, such an inconsistency would only be significant if it were to result in significant, adverse physical effects to the environment. As disclosed in this EIR, implementation of the proposed project would develop the project site with different land uses than those allowed under the existing General Plan designations and Zoning classifications. However, in all instances where significant impacts have been identified, mitigation is provided to reduce each impact sed project is processing a land use regulations to be consistent with those included by the proposed project, and because implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant mitigation would be required. Acceptance of the land use designation change, the proposed project would otherwise not conflict with any applicable goals, objectives, or policies of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, the Jurupa Valley Area Plan, or the City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Ordinance. Additionally, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable policy documents, including the Western Riverside County MSHCP (see Section 4.4, n (see Section 4.3, Air 2035 RTP/SCS (see Section 4.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions). Furthermore, Section 4.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, thresholds, would achieve greater reductions in GHG emissions than the 15% target and would implement all applicable measures in the CAP intended to reduce GHG emissions. As such, the proposed project would not conflict with a plan intended to reduce the environmental impacts of GHG emissions. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating adverse environmental effects. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.10.C Although the project site is included in the Jurupa Area Plan of the Western Riverside County MSHCP, the project site does not support any sensitive plant or wildlife species, nor does it contain any sensitive habitats such as vernal pools, marshes, or coastal sage scrub. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or have MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
any adverse impacts on any habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 4.10.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.10.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 3.4-1 The project is required to pay mitigation fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. PPP 3.4-2 The project is required to comply with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 4.10.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to land use and planning were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to land use and planning will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.10.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The extension of "A" Street will not physically divide an established community. Based on the FEIR use plan, policy, or regulation adopted to avoid or mitigate an environmental effect, including, but not limited to City of Jurupa General Plan, City of Jurupa Valley Zoning, Western Riverside County 2035 RTP/SCS and the Santa Ana River Basin Plan. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to land use and planning occur that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.11 Mineral Resources New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 4.11.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.11.A According to the General Plan32 the Project site is located within Mineral Resource occurrences of undetermined mineral resources resource extraction activity is known to have ever occurred on the Project site. Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or the residents of the State of California. 4.11.B The project site is not currently used for mineral extraction, and future use of the project site for mineral extraction is unlikely, since much of the area and adjacent land uses are residential developments that would be incompatible with a mining operation. The proposed project would require a change in the land use designation, but neither the current nor proposed land uses, nor zoning classifications would allow for mineral extraction. 4.11.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.11.3. Applicable General Plan Policies There were no GP Policies identified in the Approved Project FEIR. 4.11.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to mineral resources were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to mineral resources will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.11.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis resources and is not designated by the General Plan as a mineral resource recovery site. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to mineral resources that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.12 Noise New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 4.12.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.12.A With implementation of Mitigation Measures (MM) NOI-1 through NOI-5noise impacts will not result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. 4.12.B Predicted vibration levels at the nearest off-site structures, which are located in excess of 25 feet from the traveled roadway segments, would not result in structural damage. However, groundborne vibration associated with operation of a vibratory roller within 25 feet of a normal structure may result in a PPV of 0.21 and has the potential to result in structural damage. However, implementation of MM-NOI-5 would reduce the potential for structural damage as a result of proposed project construction by requiring a construction-related noise mitigation plan be submitted to the City for review and approval that requires that the location of construction equipment in MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
relation to adjacent sensitive receptors are detailed and that any measures to reduce noise and vibration be included on all construction documents. Therefore, construction impacts related to groundborne vibration is considered less than significant. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in exposure of residents to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant. 4.12.C The nearest airport, the Flabob Airport, is located approximately 1 mile south of the project site. Other nearby airports include the Riverside Municipal Airport (approximately 4 miles south), Ontario International Airport (approximately 10 miles west), and San Bernardino International Airport (approximately 10 miles northeast). The project site is located well outside these airport influence areas. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose residents to excessive noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant. The project site is not located within the vicinity of any private airstrip. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels, and no impact would occur. 4.12.2. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.12.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.12-1 As required by General Plan Policy NE 3.5, the Project contractors are required to limit commercial construction activities adjacent to or within 200 feet of residential uses to weekdays, between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., and limit high-noise-generating construction activities (e.g., grading, demolition, pile driving) near sensitive receptors to weekdays between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. A note shall be placed on the grading plan(s) noting this requirement. 4.12.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, the following mitigation measures were identified. MM-NOI-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a qualified acoustician shall verify that the final grading plan does not in fact propose any elevational changes that may affect the noise impact analysis conducted utilizing preliminary grading data. If indeed the final grading plan does appear to have the potential to result in changes that may affect the noise impact analysis, a final noise study shall be conducted analyzing the proposed project in light of the final grading plan. The final noise study will include requirements MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
to achieve an interior noise level of 45 dB or less in residential dwelling units on the project site through sound abatement measures such as requiring mechanical ventilation and/or air-conditioning systems in conjunction with inoperable windows facing SR-60. MM-NOI-2 In order to mitigate exterior noise levels at first floor facades to 70 dBA CNEL and at the proposed outdoor recreational area to 65 dBA CNEL, a barrier shall be constructed 10 feet above the elevation of the nearest land of the SR-60 Freeway (will vary depending on location), along the perimeter of the southern project boundary to ensure that noise levels at outdoor use areas do not exceed 65 dBA CNEL (see Figure 4.12-1). In order to be effective, the sound barriers must have a surface density of at least four pounds per square foot, and be free of openings and cracks (with the exception of expansion joints gaps and other construction techniques, which could create an opening or crack). The wall may be constructed of acrylic glass, masonry material, earthen berm, or a combination of these materials. Prior to issuance of building permits, the City shall review and approve the noise barrier design, placement and materials to ensure that the required level of sound attenuation will be achieved. MM-NOI-3 In order to mitigate exterior noise levels at first floor facades to 70 dBA CNEL and backyard noise levels to 65 dBA CNEL a barrier shall be constructed 6 feet above each pad elevation along the perimeter of each backyard of the five westernmost lots (see Figure 4.12-2) to ensure that backyard noise levels do not exceed 65 dBA CNEL. In order to be effective, the sound barriers must have a surface density of at least four pounds per square foot, and be free of openings and cracks (with the exception of expansion joints gaps and other construction techniques, which could create an opening or crack). The wall may be constructed of acrylic glass, masonry material, earthen berm, or a combination of these materials. Prior to issuance of building permits, the City shall review and approve the noise barrier design, placement and materials to ensure that the required level of sound attenuation will be achieved. MM-NOI-4 Prior to issuance of any residential building permit, an interior noise analysis shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Building and Safety Department demonstrating that the proposed building materials will achieve interior noise levels less than 45 dBA CNEL. Building materials that would facilitate compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard include but are not limited to: Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. Air gaps and rattling shall not be permitted. Doors: All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three-fourths-inch thick. Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one-half inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, well- MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
sealed gypsum board of at least one-half-inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use. A forced air circulation system (e.g., air conditioning) shall be provided in all proposed dwelling units to satisfy the requirements of the Uniform Mechanical Code. MM-NOI-5 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, an application for a construction- related exception shall be made to and considered by the Building Official. The exception application shall include the following measures to reduce construction noise to the maximum extent feasible: During site preparation and grading activities, a 12-foot temporary noise barrier would be installed along site boundaries where they abut existing single-family residential dwelling units and Avalon Street or Kenwood Place. The barrier would be continuous without openings, holes, or cracks, and shall reach the ground. The barrier may be constructed with 1-inch plywood and provide a transmission loss of at least 23 dBA to ensure noise levels do not exceed 75 dBA at single-family residential units located near the proposed project. Other materials providing the same transmission loss would also be permitted. In order to ensure compliance with General Plan Policy N-12.3, N-12.4, and Municipal Code Chapter 11.10, Noise Regulations, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer is required to submit a construction-related noise mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The plan must depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment will be mitigated during construction of this project. In addition, the plan shall require that the following notes are included on grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. a. All construction activities shall comply with Chapter 11.10 (Noise Regulations) of the Municipal Code including, but not limited to, the requirement that haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00 am to 6:00 pm during the months of June through September and 7:00 am to 6:00 pm during the months of October through May. b. Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with standards. c. All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
d. Construction equipment staging areas shall be located the greatest distance between the staging area and the nearest sensitive receptors. No substantial changes in the environment related to noise impacts will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.12.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The FEIR identified potential noise impacts due to project construction, traffic, and rail operations. The Project does not propose any changes to the intensity or type of development than what was originally allowed under the Approved Project. Mitigation Measures MM NOI-1 through NOI-5 will still be imposed on the Proposed Project. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to noise that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.13 Population and Housing New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 4.13.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.13.A Although the proposed project would regional growth projections, the proposed project would aid the City in meeting its General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in substantial population growth beyond what is expected for the area, and impacts would be less than significant.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.13.B The Project site does not contain any residential units. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not displace people or a substantial number of existing housing, nor would it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 4.13.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.13.3 Applicable General Plan Policies There were no GP Policies identified in the Approved Project FEIR. 4.13.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to population and housing were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to population and housing will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.13.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis previously considered in the FEIR. The extension of the roadway provides connectivity to two residential areas and does not foster unplanned growth. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to population and housing that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.14 Public Services New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? 4.14.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.14.Ai Fire Service: Development of the proposed project would affect fire protection services by increasing the demand on existing Riverside County Fire Department resources. These impacts include an increased number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures, traffic volume, and population. To offset the increased demand for fire protection services, the proposed project would be conditioned by the City to provide a minimum of fire safety and support fire-suppression activities, including compliance with state and local fire codes, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, paved access, fuel modification zones, and secondary access routes through PPP 4.14-1. The proposed project would also be required to which requires a fee to assist the City in providing fire protection services. Payment of the DIF fee would ensure that the proposed project provides its fair share of funds for additional public services, including fire protection services (which may be applied to fire facilities and/or equipment) to offset the incremental increase in the demand for fire protection services that would be created by the proposed project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and mitigation would not be required. 4.14.Aii Police Protection: area via the Jurupa Valley Station located at 7477 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
CA. The Project would increase the demand for police protection services. The proposed project would not require additional staff or the construction of a new sheriff station nor would it physically alter an existing station. Additionally, per PPP 4.14-2, the proposed project would be required to comply with the provisions of the public services, including police protection services. Payment of the DIF fee would ensure that the proposed project provides its fair share of funds for additional police protection services, which may be applied to sheriff facilities and/or equipment to offset the incremental increase in the demand that would be created by the proposed project. Therefore, impacts to police protection services would be less than significant. 4.14.Aiii Schools: The proposed project would be required to contribute fees to the School District through the implementation of PPP 4.14-3. Pursuant to Senate Bill 50, payment of school impact fees constitutes complete mitigation for project-related impacts to school services. Therefore, mandatory payment of school impact fees would reduce facilities to a less-than-significant level, and no mitigation would be required. 4.14.Aiv Parks: Although the proposed project incorporates recreation and park space for future residents, it would comply with PPP 4.14-4 that requires the proposed project to contribute applicable impact fees per single-family and multi-family residential units to JARPD in accordance with JARPD Park Development Fees (Assembly Bill 1600). Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1600, payments of park impact fees constitute mitigation for project-related impacts to park facilities and services. Therefore, mandatory payment recreation facilities to a less-than-significant level, and no mitigation would be required. 4.14.Av Other Public Services: Pursuant to PPP 4.14-2 the proposed project would be required to comply with the in providing public services. Payment of the DIF fee would ensure that the proposed project provides fair share of funds for additional public services. These funds may be applied to the acquisition and/or construction of public facilities and/or equipment, including library books and other resources. Mandatory payment of DIF fees would ensure that project-related impacts to library services would be less than significant. 4.14.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.14.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.14-1 The Project applicant shall comply with all applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire prevention and suppression measures relating to water improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire access, access gates, combustible construction, water availability, and fire sprinkler systems. PPP 4.14-2 payment of a development mitigation fee to assist in providing revenue that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or to offset the incremental increase in the demand for public services that would be created by the Project. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant shall pay fees in accordance No. 659. PPP 4.14-3 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required development impact fees to the Jurupa Unified School District following protocol for impact fee collection. PPP 4.15-4 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008. 4.14.4. Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to public services were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to public services will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.14.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis or other public services. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to public services that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.15 Recreation New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 4.15.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.15.A Pursuant to PPP 4.14-4 the proposed project would be required to pay park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District that would help maintain and provide park services for the new residents as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, the amount of available parkland and planned parkland included as part of the proposed project would be sufficient for the population increase caused by the proposed project without resulting in deterioration of facilities. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.15.B Potential environmental impacts that result from the recreational facilities included as part of the proposed project would be identified and minimized or avoided to the extent feasible through the implementation of plans, policies, and programs, project design features, and mitigation measures. Therefore, impacts resulting from the adverse facilities would be less than significant. 4.15.2. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.15.3. Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.14-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008. 4.15.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
As described in the FEIR, impacts related to recreation were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to recreation will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.15.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to recreation that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 4.16 Traffic and Circulation New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? 4.16.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.16.A Through alternative transportation would be reviewed and incorporated as applicable. Consequently, Project impacts related to non-vehicular traffic (i.e., transit service) will be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. The proposed Project will provide adequate pedestrian facilities, including upgrading the existing sidewalks along public streets abutting the site, as necessary. The Municipal Code also requires the Project to provide bicycle parking facilities.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.16.B Changes to CEQA Guidelines were adopted in December 2018, which require all lead agencies to adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a replacement for automobile delay-based level of service (LOS) as the new measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. This statewide mandate took effect July 1, 2020. Impacts related to LOS will be evaluated through the City's development review process apart from CEQA. Such an analysis was not performed for the Approved Project, as it was not required at the time the Certified EIR was prepared. 4.16.C Access to the site is already in place from the roadways abutting the Project site. The Project is including street improvements as described in the FEIR that will meet City standards. Since the proposed project would be consistent with City roadway standards, and for the reasons described above, the proposed project would not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses. Impacts would be less than significant. 4.16.D CALFIRE to ensure that adequate access to and from the project site would be provided for emergency vehicles. For the reasons stated, it is determined that implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on emergency access. 4.16.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.16.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PDF 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Project Proponent shall make required per-unit fee payments associated with Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), and the City of Jurupa Valley Development Impact Fee (DIF). 4.16.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, the following mitigation measures were identified: MM-TRA-1 Rubidoux Boulevard/20th Street Market Street Provide a northbound right turn overlap phase Modify east/west traffic signal phasing from split phase to protected phase Provide a dual westbound left turn lane MM-TRA-2 Rubidoux Boulevard/SR-60 WB Off-Ramp Provide a dedicated westbound left turn lane MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Modify east/west traffic signal phasing to split phase MM-TRA-3 Rubidoux Boulevard/Mission Boulevard Provide a northbound left turn lane Modify existing southbound through lane to a shared through-right lane Modify north/south traffic signal phasing to protected phase MM-TRA-4 Agua Mansa Road/Market Street Provide a dedicated southbound left turn lane MM-TRA-5 Market Street/24th Street Via Cerro Provide an eastbound right turn overlap phase MM-TRA-6 Rubidoux Boulevard/20th Street Market Street Provide an eastbound right turn lane Provide a 2nd southbound left turn lane MM-TRA-7 Rubidoux Boulevard/SR-60 WB Off-Ramp Provide a 2nd westbound left turn lane MM-TRA-8 Rubidoux Boulevard/SR-60 EB Ramps Provide a dedicated northbound right turn lane Provide a 2nd southbound left turn lane Provide dual eastbound right turn lanes MM-TRA-9 Riverview Drive/Mission Boulevard Provide an eastbound right turn overlap phase to address queuing issues 4.16.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The FEIR determined that the Approved Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts because vehicle traffic generated by the Project would diminish Level of Service (LOS) from increased automobile delay at several intersections and roadway segments. Changes to CEQA Guidelines were adopted in December 2018, which require all lead agencies to adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a replacement for automobile delay-based level of service (LOS) as the new measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. This statewide mandate took effect July 1, 2020. Impacts related to LOS will be evaluated through the City's development review process apart from CEQA. Such an analysis was not performed for the Approved Project, as it was not required at the time the Certified EIR was prepared. The Modified Project does not propose any changes to the intensity or type of development than what was originally allowed under the Approved Project. The extension of Street "A" westerly approximately 690 feet to connect to La Canada Drive will have a negligible impact on VMT, as the MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
extension would be perpendicular to Canal Street which was the original path of traffic flow and therefore not create a substantial effect on VMT beyond the approved Project. The Modified Project is not subject to a LOS type of analysis as LOS is not considered an environmental impact. However, the Modified Project is still required to implement any applicable traffic related mitigation measures or requirements as part of the Conditions of Approval imposed on the Approved Project. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to transportation that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Conditions of Approval and the Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Project Transportation impacts would be less than significant. 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste more than State or local standards, or more than the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? 4.17.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions 4.17. A & C Wastewater The proposed project would be primarily composed of residential uses with ancillary recreational uses, including a community center club house, which are not typically associated with producing excessive wastewater pollutant concentrations. The MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
proposed project is not anticipated to produce wastewater effluent containing large NPDES permit limits, or (2) produce a substantial amount of wastewater that would affect the Wastewwastewater treatment requirements. Treatment of effluent from the proposed project is anticipated to be routine and is not expected to exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB. Furthermore, PPP 4.17-1 requires the project to provide plans to the City detailing a sewage disposal system that will meet RWQCB standards service needs would be met by RCSD. Impacts would be less than significant. Water and Sewer Facilities On-site and off-site water infrastructure improvements would be done as part of construction and would primarily occur within roadways and right-of-ways of the proposed project. The environmental effects of that construction have been analyzed and impacts have been minimized or avoided through implementation of mitigation measures as discussed throughout this EIR. Additionally, the proposed project would not directly result in the expansion of any water treatment facilities. Furthermore, PPP 4.17-2 requires the project to provide plans to the City detailing a water system that will meet the requirements of California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards) in accordance with City Ordinance No. 460. Therefore, construction of new water treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities would be less than significant. On-site, there is an existing 8-inch-diameter water line that will be replaced by a new 8-inch- diameter sewer line located adjacent to the property at the westernmost portion of the site, fronting SR-60. According to WMWD, there is adequate capacity within the wastewater system to serve the proposed project (WMWD 2015). As such, aside from construction of on-site wastewater facilities that are analyzed for their potentially significant environmental impacts and reduced or avoided to the extent feasible in this EIR; existing facilities would adequately service the proposed project. Off-site, the project would be required to design and construct a sewer main in Avalon Street from 30th Street to the north side of State Route 60 where it would connect to a RCSD installed sewer main within a casing under State Route 60. However, these improvements would be within existing right-of-way, and would only be extended to connect to existing infrastructure within close proximity to the project site as determined through the environmental analysis located throughout this EIR, that includes mitigation measures to minimize and avoid environmental impacts associated with this infrastructure construction. Furthermore, PPP 4.17- 1 requires the project to provide plans to the City detailing a sewage disposal system that will meet the RWQCB standards in accordance with City Ordinance No. 460. Therefore, construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities would be less than significant.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Storm Drainage Facilities The constructed storm drains conveying flows from the project site to the existing points of discharge would be sized to accommodate the post-developed-condition peak 100-year flow in accordance with Jurupa Valley General Plan storm drain sizing criteria. The construction of on- site stormwater facilities are analyzed for their potentially significant environmental impacts and were reduced or avoided to the extent feasible in this EIR through implementation of mitigation measures. Off-site stormwater facilities that would be used by the proposed project are already existing facilities, and no additional significant environmental effects would occur from the expansion or construction of new stormwater facilities as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the construction or expansion of stormwater drainage facilities that would cause significant environmental impacts. As such, impacts would be less than significant. Electric Power Facilities The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Edison electrical distribution facilities located within the rights-of-way in Mission Boulevard and Pyrite Street. Natural Gas Facilities The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Gas natural gas distribution facilities located in Mission Boulevard and Pyrite Street. Telecommunication Facilities Telecommunication facilities include a fixed, mobile, or transportable structure, including all installed electrical and electronic wiring, cabling, and equipment, all supporting structures, such as utility, ground network, and electrical supporting structures, and a transmission pathway and associated equipment to provide cable TV, internet, telephone, and wireless telephone services to the Project site. Services that are not provided via satellite will connect to existing facilities maintained by the various service providers. 4.17.B The project is proposing a General Plan Amendment from an industrial land use designation, to residential land use designation; the change in water demand would remain within the excess project. Furthermore, PPP 4.17-2 requires the project to provide plans to the City detailing a water system that will meet the requirements of California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards) in accordance with City Ordinance No. 460. Therefore, impacts related to water supplies would be less than significant. 4.17.D PPP 4.17-4 requires that the proposed project participate in countywide and City-wide programs for residential development to reduce solid waste generation, in accordance with the provisions of the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Therefore, potential impacts associated with local landfill capacity would be less than significant. 4.17.E In accordance with PPP 4.17-4, the proposed project would also be required to participate in countywide and City-wide programs for residential development to reduce solid waste generation as described in the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. Anticipated uses at the proposed project would be typical of urban areas; would not produce substantial quantities of hazardous waste; and would not violate any federal, state, or local statutes or regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 4.17.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.17.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.17-1 The Project shall comply with Section 4.408 of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards, which requires new development projects to submit and implement a construction waste management plan in order to reduce the amount of construction waste transported to landfills. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City of Jurupa Valley shall confirm that a sufficient plan has been submitted, and prior to final documentation that confirms the volumes and types of wastes that were diverted from landfill disposal, in accordance with the approved construction waste management plan. PPP 4.17-1 As required by City Ordinance No. 460, prior to recordation of a Final Map, improvement plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer that provide for sewage disposal by connection to an existing collection system capable of accepting the waste load. The collection system shall meet the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board standards and requirements. PPP 4.17-2 As required by City Ordinance No. 460, prior to recordation of a Final Map, required improvement plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer that provide for the installation of a domestic water supply and distribution system that meets the requirements as set forth in the California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards). PPP 4.17-3 The project shall comply with Section 4.408 of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards, which requires new development projects to submit and implement a construction waste management plan to reduce the amount of construction waste transported to landfills. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City of Jurupa Valley shall confirm that a sufficient plan has been submitted, and prior to final building MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
confirms the volumes and types of wastes that were diverted from landfill disposal, in accordance with the approved construction waste management plan. PPP 4.17-4 The project shall participate in established countywide and City-wide programs for residential development projects to reduce solid waste generation, in accordance with the provisions of the Riverside Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. 4.17.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to wildfire were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to wildfire will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.17.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis The extension of "A" Street does not result in an increased demand for water, sewer, or other utility systems or services other than storm drain facilities, which were found under to have a less than significant impact. (Refer to Hydrology and Water Quality section). Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to utilities and service systems that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe 4.18.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions The CEQA section for Tribal Cultural Resources was not implemented and added to the CEQA environmental review until 2016 as a result of AB-52 Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act. Since the FPEIR certification, CEQA Guidelines Appendix G has been revised to include new Tribal Cultural Resources thresholds. Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 requires a lead agency to consult with any California Native American tribe that requests consultation and is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or EIR. The Tribal Cultural Resources impacts were discussed and included as part of the Cultural Resources Section and included Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-3. 4.18.Ai & ii On November 6, 2015, a written request was submitted to the State of California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a records search of its sacred lands file. On November 10, 2015 the nearby Pechanga and Soboba Bands of Luiseño Indians were notified of the upcoming archaeological fieldwork and invited to participate. gion were contacted in writing on November 24, 2015, to solicit local Native American input regarding any potential cultural resources concerns over the proposed project. On December 16, 2015, a field survey of the project site, accompanied by Native American monitor William Swan from the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, was conducted. The survey was completed by walking a series of transects to examine the entire project site for any evidence of human activities from the prehistoric or historic period.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.18.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.18.3 Applicable General Plan Policies There were no GP Policies identified in the Approved Project FEIR. 4.18.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, the following mitigation measure was identified. MM CUL-3: Native American Monitoring, Treatment of Discoveries, and Disposition of Discoveries. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall contact the consulting Native American Tribe(s) that have requested monitoring through consultation with the City during the AB 52 process. The applicant shall coordinate with the Tribe(s) to develop a Tribal Monitoring Agreement(s). A copy of the agreement shall be provided to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Treatment of Discoveries: If a s ignificant tribal cultural resource is discovered on the property, ground disturbing activities shall be suspended 100 feet around the resource(s). A representative of the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the Project Proponent, and the City Planning Department shall confer regarding mitigation of the discovered resource(s). A treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented to protect the identified tribal cultural resources from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall contain a research design and data recovery program necessary to document the size and content of the discovery such that the resource(s) can be evaluated for significance under CEQA criteria. The research design shall list the sampling procedures appropriate to exhaust the research potential of the tribal cultural resources in accordance with current professional archaeology standards. The treatment plan shall require monitoring by the appropriate Native American Tribe(s) during data recovery and shall require that all recovered artifacts undergo basic field analysis and documentation or laboratory analysis, whichever is appropriate. At the completion of the basic field analysis and documentation or laboratory analysis, any recovered tribal cultural resources shall be processed and curated according to current professional repository standards. The collections and associated records shall be donated to an appropriate curation facility, or, the artifacts may be delivered to the appropriate Native American Tribe(s) if that is recommended by the City of Jurupa Valley. A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department, the Eastern Information Center, and the appropriate Native American Tribe.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Disposition of Discoveries: In the event that Native American cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during the course of grading for this project. The following procedures will be carried out for treatment and disposition of the discoveries: o The landowner(s) shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods, and all archaeological artifacts and non-human remains as part of the required mitigation for impacts to tribal cultural resources. The applicant shall relinquish the artifacts through one or more of the following methods and provide the Jurupa Valley Planning Department with evidence of same: o A fully executed reburial agreement with the appropriate culturally affiliated Native American tribes or bands. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all cataloguing and basic recordation have been completed. o A curation agreement with an appropriate qualified repository within Riverside County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and therefore would be professionally curated and made available to other archaeologists/researchers for further study. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within Riverside County, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. o If more than one Native American Group is involved with the project and cannot come to an agreement as to the disposition of cultural materials, they shall be curated at the Western Science Center by default. o Should reburial of collected cultural items be preferred, it shall not occur until after the Phase IV monitoring report has been submitted to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department. Should curation be preferred, the developer/permit applicant is responsible for all costs and the repository and curation method shall be described in the Phase IV monitoring report. 4.18.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis Development of the Proposed Project will have no new impact to Tribal Cultural resources. The FEIR found that the affected area is located within a traditional use area for Native Americans and as such, mitigation measures will be implemented to required, per consultations with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians and Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians Kizh Nation. The Modified Project would be subject to the mitigation measures identified in the FEIR including Soboba MM-TRC-1 through Soboba MM-TRC-6 and Gabrieleño MM-TRC-1. With the implementation of these Mitigation Measures, impacts related to Tribal Cultural Resources would be less than significant.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to Tribal Cultural resources that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4.19 Wildfire New Potentially Significant Impact New Mitigation Required Reduced Impact No New Impact Would the project a) Is the project located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones? 4.19.1 Summary of EIR Conclusions The CEQA Wildfire section was not implemented and added to the CEQA environmental review until 2018 (Section 15126.2(a)). The FEIR contained an analysis of impacts on wildfire in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials Section in section 4.14 and summarized below. 4.19.A According to the CAL FIRE map for Fire Hazard Severity Zone in State Responsibility Areas, a portion of the project site is located within and adjacent to a high fire hazard zone (CAL FIRE 2007). Therefore, the project site is located in an area where wildfire is considered to have a high potential to occur. However, in accordance with PPP 4.14-1, the proposed project would comply with all required and applicable fire codes, ordinances, and standards to minimize potential impacts 4.19.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the FEIR. 4.19.3 Applicable General Plan Policies PPP 4.14-1 The Project applicant shall comply with all applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire prevention and suppression measures relating to water improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire access, access gates, combustible construction, water availability, and fire sprinkler systems.
MA 21060 EIR Addendum #1October 31, 2022
4.19.4 Applicable Final EIR Mitigation Measures As described in the FEIR, impacts related to wildfire were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified. No substantial changes in the environment related to wildfire will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required. 4.19.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map 1 adjacent to any existing or proposed habitable structures so it will not exacerbate the risk of wildfire. In addition, the roadway will be constructed to meet the standards for fire equipment access. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to wildfire that were not identified in the FEIR. The FEIR and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 5.0 CONCLUSION in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures than those identified in the FEIR. The effects associated with the Modified Project would be substantially the same as those reported for the FEIR, and thus no Supplemental or Subsequent EIR is required. As described in the Environmental Checklist in Section 4.0 and based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the FEIR, implementation of the proposed project modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to environmental impacts that were not identified in the FEIR. 1 https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/
ATTACHMENT 2:
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-09
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MINOR
CHANGE NO 2. TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36947
TO EXTEND LA CAÑADA DRI VE INTO TRACT AS THE
NEW SECONDARY POINT OF ACCESS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Project.
(a) On May 18, 2017, the Jurupa Valley City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017-15 certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) for General Plan Amendment No. 15004, Change of Zone No. 15003, and Tentative Tract Map Nos. 36947 and 36948 (collectively, Master Application Nos. 15072 and 15148) to permit the development of approximately 68 gross acres into 281 single -family residential lots, 118 condominiums and several open space areas on real property located north of State Route 60, east of Rio Vista Specific Plan, south of 28th Street, and west of Avalon Street (APNs: 179-070-004, 006, 007; and 178-191- 001, 002, 004, 015).
(b) Highpointe Communities, LLC (the “Applicant”) has applied for Minor Change No. 2 for Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 (Master Application No. 21060 or MA No. 21060) to extend La Cañada Drive into the tract as the new secondary access point, and a Change of Zone No. 22009 from Planned Unit Development PUD No. 02 to PUD No. 3 for the property located north of SR-60, west of Canal Street, south of 28th Street, and east of the Rio Vista Specific Plan (APNS: 179-060-002, 178-070-004, -006, -007, 178-120-001, and -002 (the “Project”). (c) The City Council originally approved applications for General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 15004, Change of Zone (CZ) No. 15003 (including PUD-02 Development Plan), Tentative Parcel Map No. 36947 (“Emerald Ridge South”), and Tentative Tract Map No. 36948 (“Emerald Ridge North”) (collectively, Master Application Nos. 15072 and 15148) on May 18, 2017.
(d) On March 25, 2020, the Planning Commission approved Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 to delete Engineering Department Conditions of Approval Nos. 5.3, 7.4, 7.7.2, and 7.8.3.
(e) On March 25, 2020, the Planning Commission approved the first one (1) year Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 to May 18, 2021 . Per Assembly Bill 1561, the map was automatically extended an additional six (6) months to November 18, 2021. (f) On February 23, 2022, the Planning Commission approved the second (1) year Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 to November 18, 2022. -2-
(g) On November 9, 2022, the Planning Commission approved the third (1) year Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 to November 18, 2023.
Section 2. Minor Changes to Tentative Tract Map Authority. (a) The Applicant seeks Minor Change No. 2 to Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 to reconfigure previously approved lot lines to extend La Cañada into the tract as the new secondary point of access instead of a railroad crossing at Alta Street. (b) Section 7.15.210 of Chapter 7.15 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides the procedure for a minor change to a previously approved tentative map. (c) Pursuant to Section 7.15.210, any request for approval of a minor change to a previously approved tentative map must be filed with the Community Development Department.
The Community Development Director must make a recommendation to the body having jurisdiction over the underlying map and notice a public hearing in accordance with Section
7.15.130 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, unless the u nderlying map did not previously require a hearing. The Planning Commission may decide the matter when it appears on the agenda, or it may continue the matter with or without the consent of the land divider. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final, unless the decision is appealed to the City Council. In this case, however, since the City Council was the approving body on Tentative Tract Map No. 36947, the City Council will be the approving body on Minor Change No. 2 to Tentative Tract Map No. 36947. The approval by the City Council of a minor change shall not affect the time period within which the land divider must prepare and file the final map. (d) Section 7.15.200 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires denial of a revised tentative parcel map if it does not meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act or of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development;
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development;
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems; -3-
7) That t he design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; 8) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Qualit y Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.
Section 3. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 21060 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On December 14, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21060, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. (c) On January 19, 2023, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21060, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and d id address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) On January 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023 -08, adopting an Addendum to the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Emerald Ridge Residential Project. Resolution No. 2023-08 is incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
Section 5. Findings for Approval of Minor Change No. 2. A tentative map shall be denied if it does not meet all requirements of this title, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans . The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan in that the project site is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) that allows up to five (5) dwelling units per acre, and the project is proposing 4.2 dwelling units per acre; -4-
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable gener al and specific plans The proposed design of the project is consistent with the General Plan in that it provides for the necessary travel lanes, access, circulation, grading, and drainage;
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development . The site of the proposed project is physically suitable for the development in that it is relatively flat, and adequately serviceable; 4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. The site of the proposed project is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development in that it is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) that allows up to five (5) dwelling units per acre, and project is proposing 4.2 dwelling units per acre;
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat . The design of the proposed project will not cause environmental damage or injure wildlife in that Environmental Impact Report, with a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, has been certified and adopted, and findings have been made pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act;
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems . The design of the proposed project will not cause serious public health problems as it is a medium density residential project surrounded primarily by residential, commercial, and open space land uses; 7) That the design of the proposed land division or the t ype of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. The design of the proposed project will not conflict with any easements; and 8) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the Cal ifornia Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. On May 18, 2017, the City of Jurupa Valley adopted Resolution No. 2017 -15 certifying an EIR and Statement of Overriding Considerations for Master Applications (MAs) No. 15072 and 15148 – “Emerald Ridge” (North and South).
Section 6. Approval of Master Application No. 21060. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Minor Change No. 2 to Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 t o extend La Cañada Drive into the tract as the new secondary -5-
access point for the property located north of SR-60, west of Canal Street, south of 28th Street, and east of the Rio Vista Specific Plan (APNS: 179-060-002, 178-070-004, -006, -007, 178-120- 001, and -002), as shown on the Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and subject to the revised Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of January, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Vicki Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-6-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 202 3-09, was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of January, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of January, 2023.
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Exhibit A Development Plan
Emerald Ridge North
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
MASTER APPLICATION (NO.) 21060
TRACT MAP 36947
LEAD AGENCY
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
DEVELOPER
Highpointe Emerald Ridge, LLC
16501 Scientific Way
Irvine, CA 92618
PREPARED BY
Architerra Design Group – Landscape Architecture
Proactive Engineering Consultants – Civil Engineering
December 2022
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………….. 4
Document Purpose…………………………………………………………………. 4
Project Location……………………………………………………………………. 4
Vicinity Map (Figure I-1)……………………………………………………………... 5
Project Description………………………………………………………………….6
Required Project Approvals…………………………………………………........... 6 Development Plan………………………………………………………………….. 6
Community Theme………………………………………………………………..6-7
Emerald Ridge North Standards and Guidelines…………………………………... 7 Housing Plan and Permitted Uses………………….....…………………………….7 II. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN……………………………………………………. 8
Residential Standards………………………………………………………………. 8
Site Plan (Figure II-1)…………………………………………………………………. 9
Residential Guidelines……………………………………………………………... 10
Architectural Styles…………………………………………………………………10
Architectural Style Elevations (Figure III-1)………………………………………11-14 Form and Massing…………………………………………………………………. 15
Plotting……………………………………………………………………………... 16
Roofs……………………………………………………………………………….. 16
Garages…………………………………………………………………………...... 17
Windows and Doors………………………………………………………………... 17
Outdoor Lighting………………………………………………………………..17-18
Mechanical Equipment…………………………………………………………….. 18
III. LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES………………………. 19 Conceptual Landscape Plan (Figure IV-1)……………………………………………. 20 General Landscaping Standards………………………………………………………. 21
Slopes………………………………………………………………………………. 21
Irrigation………………………………………………………………………...21-22
Outdoor Lighting…………………………………………………………………... 22
Landscape Guidelines…………………………………………………………………. 22
Plant Palette……………………………………………………………………..22-26
Images from Plant Palette………………………………………………………….. 27
Entry Monument…………………………………………………………………… 28
Streetscapes………………………………………………………………………… 28
IV. WALL AND FENCE PLAN………………………………………………………… 29
Masonry Block Wall………………………………………………………………. 29
Decorative Tubular Steel Fencing………………………………………………… 29
Vinyl Fencing……………………………………………………………………… 29
Vinyl Rail Fencing………………………………………………………………….30
Wall and Fencing Plan (Figure IV-1)………………………………………………... 30 V. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND OPEN SPACE……………………………... 31 Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
3 Parks………………………………………………………………………………... 31
Recreational Amenities Plan (Figure VI-1)………………………………………….. 32 Recreational Amenities Plan Enlargements (Figure V-1)…………………………… 33 Trails……………………………………………………………………………….. 34
Trail and Paseo Plan (Figure VIII-1)………………………………………………… 35 Maintenance of Common Areas and Recreational Amenities……………………….. 36 Appendix A…………………………………………………………………………... 37
Tentative Tract Map……………………………………………………………..38-39
Phasing Map……………………………………………………………………...... 40
TTM COZ Map…………………………………………………………………….. 41
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
4 I. INTRODUCTION
A. Document Purpose
This document, know n as the Emerald Ridge North Development Plan (“Plan”), has been prepared as part of the City of Jurupa Valley’s requirements for the approval of land use entitlements for the Emerald Ridge North residential project. The document is part of the entitlement record and provides the vis ion and direction for the development of the Emerald Ridge North neighborhood. The project meets the following minimum five (5) out of nine (9) features/requirements for a PUD:
1. Residential clustering that will provide for new neighborhoods combined with abundant open space. The project will preserve the existing Montana Ave. as a multi- purpose trail and will preserve natural open space within the northwest boundary of the project that abuts boulder outcroppings and vegetated slopes of the native Inland Sage Scrub plant community.
2. The project will provide a substantial public amenity, for example, a significant public plaza, a public park, trails or a similar improved open space feature, including provisions for guaranteed long-term maintenance not at the expense of the city.
The multi-purpose trail system will link into the JARPD Regional Trail System and will provide a substantial public amenity . In addition, t he project will also provide multiple pocket parks for community gathering and play. The parks and community landscaping will be maintained by the Homeowners Association for the project.
3. The project includes significant environmental benefits, such as pr eservation, enhancement and/or creation of a significant natural feature or open spaces with a minimum area of one-half (1/2) acre. Over (10) ten acres of native Inland Sage Scrub plantings to the northeast of the project at the base of the Jurupa Hills wi ll be preserved.
4. The project provides for a significant saving of water usage over the life of the project. Drought tolerant and native landscaping will make up the majority of the landscape areas and park features. Along with a low-volume irrigation design, the project will provide significant water savings over the life of the project.
5. Stormwater runoff controls.
The project will incorporate stormwater runoff controls, including water quality basins and bioswales within the pocket parks.
B. Project Location
The Emerald Ridge North project is comprised of an area generally located in the Northeast section of the City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County, California. As shown in the Figure I -1, Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
5 Vicinity Map, the project is situated north of Canal Street between the State Route 60 Free way and 28th Street. The project site is vacant and abuts beautiful rural hills.
FIGURE I-1 – VICINITY MAP
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
6 C. Project Description
The Emerald Ridge North residential project involves the subdivision of 43.7 acres of property and the development of 184 high-end single-family homes. The development includes various landscaped common areas and recreational amenities to provide opportunities for social interaction, healthy outdoor activities, and neighborhood identity.
D. Required Project Approvals
In order to develop the Emerald Ridge North project a series of approvals will need to be obtained from the City of Jurupa Valley. The approvals required for the development of Emerald Ridge North include a Change of Zone (CZ) from PUD -02 to PUD -03, and a Minor Change to Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 36947 . Each of these entitlements will accomplish the following:
1. The Change of Zone (CZ) from PUD-02 to PUD-03 is to allow changes not permitted via an amendment to an approved development plan. Amendments shall not include changes in circulation features including the street network. Amendments to this aspect of an approved final development plan shall be accom plished only by reapplication and submittal of a new preliminary development plan via a CZ application.
2. The Minor Change to Tentative Tract map (TTM) No. #36947 is to maintain two points of access to the development and subsequently enhance vehicular & tr ail connectivity north of Canal Street.
E. Development Plan
Through a series of guidelines, standards, and illustrations, this document provides the minimum requirements that must be followed when designing the different housing types and the neighborhood la ndscaping in the Emerald Ridge North neighborhood. The content in the Development Plan is to be used as reference information and visual aids to understand the overall intent of Emerald Ridge North ’s vision, theme, and its key implementing design elements. An exact re -creation of the graphic representations included in this document is not intended or required. The guidelines and standards merely provide a palette of character, materials, and other defining elements that should be reflected in the constr uction of the Emerald Ridge North community.
Development of the Emerald Ridge North residential neighborhood shall substantially conform to the physical characteristics and design concepts set forth in this Plan. The City has the discretion to determine if implementing actions substantially conform to the info rmation contained in the Plan.
F. Community Theme
Because of its adjacent proximity to the Jurupa Hills recreational open space areas, the Emerald Ridge North residential development is designed to complement and support the preservation of Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
7 this significant natural open space, while addressing the City’s residential development goals.
As such, the neighborhood theme is a pedestrian friendly neighborhood, encourages social interaction, healthy activities and residential design that is diverse and interesting. It aims to do this by mixing various housing and landscaping design elements, along with various recreational amenities and common spaces that area located throughout the development. Amongst the amenities provided are a community park, tot lot playground, passive park with seating areas and shade structure, and paseos with trails.
G.
Emerald Ridge North Standards and Guidelines
In order to build the Emerald Ridge North residential project as envisioned, a set of standards and guidelines have been prepared and area provided in the body of this document. The purpose of these standards and guidelines is to provide the information that is necessary to direct and guide the design of a high-quality living environment for the Emerald Ridge North residential development. They address the design elements that help achieve the vision and environment that is planned for the projects housing and neighborhood. Through these guidelines, the homes in Emerald
Ridge North will demonstrate individuality, high quality of design and construction, and value-added appeal.
The following pages provide standards, guidelines, floor plans, elevation drawings, and other information needed to understand the design of homes in the Emerald Ridge North project. A palette of the most common character-defining elements is addressed, including home plotting, form and massing, roofs, garages, doors and windows, and mechanical subjects such as outdoor lighting and mechanical equipment, etc. It is expected that builders and their architects will prepare architectural building plans that substantially conform to these standards and guidelines, while also applying creativity and innovation in response to housing design trends, homebuyer expectations, and other market conditions. Where design elements are not expressly addressed or design issues arise, the applicable sections of the City of Jurupa Valley’s zoning standards, the Riverside County 2nd District Design Guidelines, and regulations in effect at the time will be utilized for direction.
H. Housing Plan & Permitted Uses
A range of home sizes, home styles, and floor plans will be developed to suit different households. The housing mix would consist of 92 three- (3) bedroom/bathroom, and 92 four- (4) bedroom/ three- (3) bathroom units. The homes would range in size from 1,378 sq. ft. to 2,059 sq. ft.
Permitted uses will include residential uses (single-family dwellings), and home occupations as defined by the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
8 II. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN
The residential standards and guidelines that follow shall apply to the community of Emerald Ridge North. As can be seen in Figure II -1, the single-family housing is designed to provide a high level of quality and attractive design. It is the intent of the standards and guidelines to provide the direction needed to achieve that objective.
A. Development Standards
Land Use Requirement Standard
Minimum Lot Area sf 3,500
Minimum Width ft 40
Minimum Depth ft 75
Max. Residence Height ft 35
Setback Requirements
Front Yard ft 14
Garage ft 20
Side Yard ft 5
Corner/reversed lot ft 10
Rear Yard ft 10
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
9 FIGURE II-1 – SITE PLAN
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
10 B. Residential Guidelines
Residential development within the Emerald Ridge North community shall comply with the development guidelines listed below. Amongst the guidelines covered are architectural styles, form and massing, plotting, roofs, garages, windows and doors, outdoor lighting, and mechanical equipment.
C. Architectural Styles
The design of the Emerald Ridge North neighborhood features a cohesive mix of architectural styles that include Spanish, Traditional, and Tuscan. The defining features of the selected architectural styles must be consistently implemented across the neigh borhood to visually identify and differentiate each style. These guidelines allow for both traditional/historical styles and contemporary interpretations of these styles, provided that the style’s defining features can be visually identified, consistently applied, and differentiated from the character -defining features of other styles implemented in the neighborhood.
The selection of architectural styles should be compatible with the massing of their floor plans; as such, a certain style should not be forced onto every floor plan if it is not compatible. By emphasizing the use of distinct and identifiable styles, thes e guidelines discourage monotony.
Street scenes shall incorporate multiple architectural styles and should be diverse as to form, massing, features, windows, front doors, garage doors, materials, colors, etc.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
11 FIGURE III-1 – ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
Elevations shown are “Conceptual Only”. Final plans per separate submittal with final approval per Community Development Director
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
12 FIGURE III-1 – ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
Elevations shown are “Conceptual Only”. Final plans per separate submittal with final approval per Community Development Director
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
13 FIGURE III-1 – ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
Elevations shown are “Conceptual Only”. Final plans per separate submittal with final approval per Community Development Director
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
14 FIGURE III-1 – ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
Elevations shown are “Conceptual Only”. Final plans per separate submittal with final approval per Community Development Director
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
15 D. Form and Massing
Creating streets that provide a high -level of variety in building forms is a primary objective of these guidelines. An important aspect of this objective is the massing and scale of the neighborhood layout and the various types of residences within it. I n Emerald Ridge North , these residences have been designed with particular attention to compatibility with the size, form, and volume of the various home models, and careful consideration for the neighborhood’s various architectural styles. For the most part, the homes on Emerald Ridge North are meant to be simple, and elegant in their massing, and concurrently reflect the recognizable elements of the homes architectural style. Although techniques for managing form and massing area well know, the following guidelines are presented to provide direction and guidance for the massing and scale of the homes in Emerald Ridge North.
1. Homes are to be arranged in a manner that creates a harmonious, varied appearance of building heights and setbacks.
2. The exterior massing of the home should reflect the room layouts of the home and organized to create a positive street environment.
3. Incorporate single-story elements in multi-story buildings.
4. Avoid creating overly complicated massing in a neighborhood where the typical character of nearby house has much simpler forms.
5. The permitted height of a structure sh ould minimize the visual impact on neighboring backyards and limit the loss of privacy of residents of neighboring lots.
6. Homes built on lots that area larger than neighboring lots shall not be significantly larger in size and scale relative to neighboring houses.
7. Three sides of a two -story house, excluding the rear elevation, should have at least one break at the first and/or second story in order to avoid monolithic elevations. A plane break mush be offset in an appropriate and pleasing manner.
8. Creatively use setbacks, high -end designs, outdoor spaces, varied garage treatments, landscaping, and innovative streetscape design to form a visually appealing and interesting neighborhood scene.
Overall, the intent of the above guidelines is to stress the use of t he above and similar techniques to create a residential neighborhood that is visually appealing and compatible in size, form, and volume with neighboring structures and street layout.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
16 E. Plotting
Rows of homes seen from a distance or along arterial roads area perceived visually by their contrast against the skyline or background and their relationship to adjacent homes. Therefore, the plotting of each neighborhood and the assignment of elevations and color schemes play an important role in creating visually interesting street scenes. To achieve this, the following guidelines are provided:
1. All units shall be plotted in compliance with t he adopted standards including setbacks in the Development Plan.
2. Floorplans for each lot should be selected to provide a diverse and deliberate mixture of plans throughout the neighborhood.
3. Plans should also be mixed to avoid a repetitious pattern within t he same street and along adjacent streets.
4. When plotting of the same plan cannot be avoided, the adjacent plan should be assigned a significantly different elevation style and/or color scheme to create a distinction between the two homes.
5. Color schemes and elevations should also be assigned to provide a diverse and deliberately haphazard mix of plans throughout the neighborhood.
6. In no instance shall the same color scheme be combined immediately adjacent to one another; i.e., across the street, next door or on the lot behind.
F. Roofs
The interior and exterior of the neighborhood should contribute positively to the character of the place. A variety of roof forms and pitches will create a positive public realm. The following roof design criteria will be emphasized in Emerald Ridge North.
1. Roofs shall be composed of a series of simple roof forms.
2. Roof design shall avoid to the extend feasible, repetition in continuous gable ends and similar ridge heights. Where not feasible design elements should be used to crea te variety.
3. Roofs shall vary in massing along street scene and open spaces.
4. Roof forms shall reinforce the architectural style of the home and be appropriate to that style.
5. Roof pitches are encouraged to range from not less than 4:12 and not more than 8:12.
6. Roofing materials should be consistent with the architectural style of the home.
7. Roof materials and colors selected for an architectural style must reflect the elements that are typically used in that style.
8. Roofing materials shall be non-combustible.
9. Solar panels, if used, should be integrated into the roof design as an unobtrusive element.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
17 G. Garages
All residential units shall not have less than two parking spaces in a garage with roll -up door and shall be maintained at all times. To achieve attractive streetscapes throughout the Emerald Ridge North neighborhood, particular attention must be given to the design and placement of garages.
1. Garage door style, color and design shall reflect the architectural character of the home and shall vary between adjacent homes, when appropriate. Acceptable garage door styles include, but are not limited to raised panel, recessed panel, flush panel in both roll-up and carriage swing door designs.
2. Architectural treatments, including but not limited to, trellises, corbels, and arches maybe be incorporated into the garage design to de -emphasize the garage and achieve an attractive street scene.
3. Windows may be incorporated into the garage door design. Where provided, garage door window styles shall correspond to the window forms of the house.
4. Architectural features, such as varied rooflines (including height and pitch) a nd second- story setbacks, when incorporated into the garage design reduce building mass and scale and create a visually interesting streetscape, when appropriate for the selected architectural style.
5. Two-car garage configurations may be divided into one/on e configurations with individual doors to provide visual variety along the streetscape.
6. As additional options to provide an enhanced streetscape, driveways may include accent paving and maintenance -free decorative strip, such as pavers, artificial grass or other pervious materials.
H. Windows and Doors
Window and door details are architectural components that carry a strong visual impact through their placement and design.
1. Front door details shall be consistent with the architectural style.
2. Feature window shapes shall be consistent with the architectural style.
3. Accent shutters are not required; however, when used, shutter size shall be proportional to the window and shall reflect the architectural style.
4. Window trim details used on the front elevation shoul d also be applied to the sides and rear of the house for continuity.
5. Windows and/or doors with silver or gold frames or reflective glass are prohibited.
I. Outdoor Lighting
Lighting standards throughout Emerald Ridge North shall be similar in style, color and materials, embracing a natural and minimal lighting approach.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
18 1. To the extent feasible and permissible under City standards, all outdoor lighting shall incorporate measures to aid in reducing light pollution. Such measures include: wattage reduction, directing lighting downward, shielding lights (or using “cut -off lights” that only illuminate the side or underside of the fixture, rather than shining skyward) and lowering the height of light poles to reduce the illumination radius.
2. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be focused, directed, and arranged to minimize glare and illumination on public streets and adjoining property.
J. Mechanical Equipment
Mechanical equipment such as air conditioning , heaters, evaporative coolers, and other such devices shall not be mounted on any roof and must be located behind privacy walls or landscaping. Solar panels are permitted, but not required, on roofs.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
19 III. LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
The Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines provide the information and direction needed to create the various elements of the landscape framework for the Emerald Ridge North neighborhood. The framework includes the streetscape, recreational amenities, open spaces, and entry monuments. The design of the landscape framew ork is intended to complement the panoramic view of rural hillsides, foothills, and working ranches as well as the distant downtown Riverside area vistas. A key function of the landscape framework is that it provides a pedestrian friendly environment in i ts mass and scale, and seamlessly connects the various landscape features and amenities within the neighborhood and the surrounding area.
Emerald Ridge North is envisioned as a residential area where trees, plants, and natural materials are located throughout the perimeter and interior of the neighborhood, providing a natural setting that encourages healthy outdoor activity, establishes a sense of place for the residents, and gives Emerald Ridge North its unique identity amongst the various neighborhoods in the City of Jurupa Valley. The Conceptual Landscape Plan (Figure I V-1) illustrates the Emerald Ridge North landscape framework, its various design elements, and the connections between the residential areas and open spaces. As illustrated, the framework provides a pedestrian friendly environment with ample sidewalks, trails, and multiple opportunities to connect the recreational amenities with the open spaces throughout the neighborhood and the adj acent Jurupa Mountains.
General landscape standards are provided below followed by landscape design guidelines for key landscape elements.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
20 FIGURE IV-1 – CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
21 GENERAL LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
General landscape standards for the Emerald Ridge North community are provided below and on the following pages:
A. Required Planting and Irrigation Plan
A landscape architect licensed in the State of California shall be retained to prepare planting and irrigation plans for all public areas. Arrangem ent of plants should be relatively informal; plants should be placed to allow them to grow to their natural sizes and forms, and sheared hedges should be kept to a minimum.
B. Slopes
1. Cut slopes equal to or greater than eight feet (8’) in vertical height and f ill slopes equal to or greater than five feet (5’) in vertical height shall be planted with drought tolerant shrubs, grasses and/or ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and instability.
2. Slopes exceeding fifteen feet (15’) in vertical height shall be planted with drought tolerant shrubs, spaced not more than ten feet (10’) average on center or trees spaced not to exceed thirty feet (30’) average on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent spacing, in addition to the low spreading shrubs, grasses and/or ground cover.
3. Grading: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the aesthetic impact of slopes and grade differences where the project adjoins streets or other properties shall be approved by the Planning Director.
C. Irrigation
1. Proper consideration of irrigation system design and installation in the extreme climate of the Emerald Ridge North community is critical to the landscape investment. In particular, the combined summer elements of heat and wind must be carefully considere d in proper irrigation design and equipment selection.
2. All landscape areas shall be watered with a permanent irrigation system, with the goal of minimizing water use and runoff.
3. Irrigation systems that adjoin a separate maintenance responsibility area shal l be design in a manner to ensure complete water coverage between the areas. A concrete header shall be installed along the dividing line between each separate maintenance area so that it is obvious. The irrigation system shall also be designed using a s eparate point of connection and mainline.
4. All irrigation systems shall have automatic controllers designed to properly water plants given the sites soil conditions.
5. Irrigation systems for all public landscapes shall have automatic rain shut-off devices.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
22 6. At a minimum, overhead spray irrigation systems shall be designed with head-to-head 100% coverage with consideration to over spray and runoff. Areas less than 10’ wide should be designed using a drip type of system.
7. Overhead spray heads shall be a minimum o f two feet (2’) away from any hardscape walkways, driveways, trails, etc. Drip irrigation can be designed to cover any areas adjacent to the to hardscape to minimize overspray and runoff.
8. Southern California native and drought tolerant shrub areas shall b e watered using a combination of spray and drip or bubbler irrigation to shrubs and trees. In addition, irrigation controllers should be evapo transpiration based (ET “smart”) and be capable of providing multiple repeat start times and adjustments to the i rrigation times due to seasonal precipitation.
9. Trees shall be designed on a separate valve than shrub areas.
10. Irrigation backflow prevention devices and controllers shall be located with minimum public visibility or shall be screened with appropriate plant materials.
11. Irrigation systems shall be designed per current drought guidelines and must comply with the City of Jurupa Valley ordinances.
D. Outdoor Lighting
Sufficient outdoor lighting after dusk shall be provided. Pedestrian level lighting shall be provided within parks or open space areas. All lighting fixtures shall be maintained in good condition. Light fixtures shall be designed to prevent any light to flood onto adjacent properties.
LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES
A. Plant Palette
A key landscape guideline is the extensive use of low and medium water -use California native plants or plants that can adapt to Southern California’s Mediterranean arid climate. The recommended plant selection that adorns the framework and its various elements includes colorful perennials, ground covers and accent grasses, as well as evergreen and deciduous trees that do not require extensive irrigation and compliment the style of plants listed in this palette.
The recommended planting materials for the Conceptual Landscape Plan are p rovided in the Plant Palette. This plant palette is not proposed to be a rigid inventory of required plants.
Instead, it is meant to provide guidance in the type of plant materials that maintain the spirit of the design theme and ensure that streetscapes , walls, and parks are compatible with the neighborhood’s landscape design framework. It is intended that when direction is needed, the guidelines will be used as a resource for the landscape planning and design of the Emerald Ridge North community. Street trees and related security and agreements are required pursuant to Title 7 (Subdivision), Chapter 7.55 (Street Trees).
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
23 Depending on their exposure, the suggested plants to be used in the Emerald Ridge North development may not be suitable for every loca tion; however, the palette provides an extensive list to choose from . Other plants may be substituted provided they are water -efficient, non - invasive, and maintain the neighborhood landscape theme. Each plant zone shall have similar water requirements (h ydrozones) so irrigation systems can be designed to minimize water use and plants can thrive in the best possible conditions. As with the development standards and guidelines, any landscape design elements or topics that are not expressly addressed in thi s Plan will be governed by the City’s standards and regulations in effect at the time.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
24 PLANT PALETTE - TREES
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
25 PLANT PALETTE - SHRUBS
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
26 PLANT PALETTE – SHRUBS CONT.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
27 IMAGES FROM PLANT PALETTE
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
28 B. Entry Monument
An e ntry monument is proposed at the primary entry point into the Emerald Ridge North community and shall be designed to create a distinctive entrance statement that establishes the character and identity. Specifically, an entry monument is located at the community entry point off 28th Street. The entry monument incorporates many of the design elements illustrated in the fence and wall plan and the landscaping on the streetscape. The monume nt incorporates a community sign (utilizing a corner cut of the perimeter wall) , along with accent pilasters to each side with a mixture of accent perennials, foreground planting and a specimen tree(s).
C. Streetscapes
A beautifully landscape environment is an important mark of any high -quality community. In addition to creating a sense of place, it also invites residents to explore, enjoy the neighborhood, and socialize. The landscaping along the various residential streets is meant to reinforce Emerald R idge North ’s goal to create an environment that encourages healthy activities and social interaction. The street pattern and landscaping within the community is residential and shall be designed with consideration to scale and mass to help maintain a pedestrian friendly and proportionate street character. It will reflect the volume of traffic on the street, provide a sense of safety and reinforce the separation between vehicles and pedestrians.
To achieve the above -mentioned objectives, the streetscapes t hrough the Emerald Ridge North community will be planted with a combination of street trees, low shrubs and ground covers suggested in the Plant Palette. As previously stated, the palette provides a selection of plants that area recommended for the Emerald Ridge North development, but does not prohibit the use of substitute plants that are similar in water requirements and adhere to the neighborhood’s landscape theme.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
29 IV. WALL AND FENCE PLAN
Walls and fences serve a number of important functions in a neighborhood. They provide enclosure, screening, security, privacy, separate areas, serve as a backdrop, focus a view, and retain water and earth. Fence designs and materials shall be functional and compatible with the neighborhood architecture and street scape. Fences should be designed as an integra component and extension of the building design and surrounding landscape. Periphery walls can be integrated into the adjacent structure and extended into the landscape to help integrate the building into its environment. Gates should be complementary in style and color to its fence or wall.
The Wall and Fence Plan for the Emerald Ridge North neighborhood is provided in Figure V -1.
Two types of wall and fences are proposed in the Emerald Ridge North neighborhood development. They will be constructed of materials, colors, and textures that are compatible with neighborhood design and architectural scheme. The walls and fences are described below.
A. Masonry Block Wall
Tan split-face masonry block walls shall be constructed at the interface between roadways and the side and rear yards of residential lots to maximize privacy and provide noise attenuation.
The masonry block walls shall be up to six feet (6’) tall adjacent to primary interior streets and off-streets. At interior neighborhood streets and cul -de-sacs, masonry walls shall be a minimum of five feet (5’) tall. Where the wall face is visible from public viewing areas, tan split -face block shall be used. Tan split-face block pilasters and concrete caps shall be used as needed, and clinging vines may be used to soften the view and add to the streetscape character.
B. Decorative Tubular Steel Fencing
This type of fencing will be installed around the water quality basin areas. At points of transition and d irectional changes, split -face pilasters with pre -cast concrete caps will be used. Tubular steel fencing at these locations will be six feet (6’) in height.
C. Vinyl Fencing
Vinyl fencing shall be used within interior property lines to separate each individual lot. Vinyl fencing shall be white and fully closed with no openings and posts spaced at approximately 8’-0” on center with an overall height of six feet (6’).
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
30 D. Vinyl Rail Fencing
Vinyl rail fencing shall be used along portions of the trail a djacent to roadways and at the tot lot playground park where added separation of fencing can be used to control access into the park.
The vinyl rail fencing shall be a 2-rail and 42” high, using the JARPD standard fencing detail.
FIGURE V-1 – WALL AND FENCING PLAN
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
31 V. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND OPEN SPACE
An essential feature of the Emerald Ridge North development is the various recreational and open space facilities that are located throughout the neighborhood as illustrated in the Recreational Amenities Plan in Figure VI – 1. Emerald Ridge North provides slightly over 13.13 acres of recreational facilities and open space. Recreational facilities include landscaped paseos, walking trails and shade portals, passive parks with seating and shade structure, and children's tot lot playground with seating and shade structure. The facilities provide opportu nities for healthy activities and socializing, and they also add visual diversity and interest to the area. Like the other structures in the neighborhood, the design and appearance is to the utmost importance, as they contribute to the neighborhood appearance and give Emerald Ridge North its unique and identifiable character. The following general guidelines shall be utilized in their design:
1. Common recreational features shall be key c haracter elements for the neighborhood, and each shall be designed with consideration for different recreational uses in view of the overall number of facilities and their particular use.
2. All architectural and community elements, such as street furnishings , benches, lighting standards and trash receptacles, shall be consistent with the selected overall architectural character for the neighborhood.
3. Colors, massing, roof pitch and materials shall be compatible with residential buildings or project theme.
Enlargement Plans and further information for each of the recreational amenities are provided in the landscape exhibits.
A. Parks
Passive Open Space Parks and an Open Space Park featuring a children's tot lot play area are part of the Emerald Ridge North community. These park areas are recreation areas that require minimal development with emphasis placed on the neighborhood -level scale and variety of outdoor activities. Depending on the use, these parks may include shade structures, benches, picnic tables, play ground structures, meandering concrete, edible gardens and enhanced landscaping. Any turf grass used within these parks shall be a warm season variety and should be sized appropriately for use. Turf grass shall not be used in narrow unusable areas. In addition, perennials, ground covers, vines and flowering accent trees and specimen trees shall be strategically located to help in providing additional shade for users. Further information for each of the parks are provided in Figure VII – 1.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
32 VI. FIGURE VI-1 – RECREATIONAL AMENITIES PLAN
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
33 FIGURE VII-I – RECREATIONAL AMENITIES PLAN ENLARGEMENTS
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
34 B. Trails
Trails provide strong pedestrian connectivity with the Emerald Ridge North community . A multi-purpose trail provides a safe pathway within the community, adjoining the main streets within the project. An improved 8’ wide stabilized decomposed granite trail runs parallel with 28th Street and joins the existing Montana Ave. trail at Open Space 185. The trail runs along the natural open space edge lot and then reconnects with the future extensi on of La Canada Dr., as a concrete multi-purpose path and runs parallel to the edge of the project boundary. See Trail and Paseo Plan, Figure VIII – 1 for more information.
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
35 FIGURE VIII-1 – TRAIL AND PASEO PLAN
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
36 C. Maintenance of Common Areas and Recreational Amenities Maintenance responsibilities for common areas and recreational amenities within the Emerald Ridge North community are described below. Private homeowners shall be responsible for all maintenance within their private lot area as well as fences and wall surfaces on their internal boundaries. For all other areas of the neighborhood, maintenance responsibilities shall be as follows:
X
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
37 VII. APPENDIX A
This appendix is intended to supplement the project development information provided in the Plan’s various sections. In addition to illustrations provided in the previous sections of the Plan, it also contains additional drawings and information that provide further guidance, direction, and detail on the vision and pl an for the development of the Emerald Ridge North residential development. Exhibits include the following:
Tentative Tract Map
Phasing Map
TTM COZ Exhibit
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
38 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
39 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
40 PHASING MAP
Emerald Ridge North TTM 36947 Development Plan
41 TTM COZ MAP
PUD-03
Exhibit B
Conditions of Approval
EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
EXHIBIT B
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. PROJECT PERMITTED. MA21060 (PUD-03, TTM36947M2) is for an approval for a subdivision to construct 184 single-family detached homes located north of State Route (SR) 60, west of Canal Street, south of 28 th Street, and east of the Rio Vista Specific Plan (SP) (APNS: 179-060-002; 178-070-004, -006, -007; 178-120-001, and 002). Signs are not a part of this approval.
2. INDEMNIFY CITY. The applicant, the property owner or other holder of the right to the development entitlement(s) or permit(s) approved by the City for the project, if different from the applicant (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitor”), shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Jurupa Valley and its elected city council, its appointed boards, commissions, and committees, and its officials, employees, and agents (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, fines, penalties, and expenses, including without limitation litigation expenses and attorney’s fees, arising out of either (i) the City’s approval of the project, including without limitation any judicial or administrative proceeding initiated or maintained by any person or entity challenging the validity or enforceability of any City permit or approval relating to the project, any condition of approval imposed by City on such permit or approval, and any finding or determination made and any other action taken by any of the Indemnitees in conjunction with such permit or approval, including without limitation any action taken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), or (ii) the acts, omissions, or operations of the Indemnitor and the directors, officers, members, partners, employees, agents, contractors, and subcontractors of each person or entity comprising the Indemnitor with respect to the ownership, planning, design, construction, and maintenance of the project and the property for which the project is being approved. The City shall notify the Indemnitor of any claim, lawsuit, or other judicial or administrative proceeding (herein, an “Action”) within the scope of this indemnity obligation and request that the Indemnitor defend such Action with legal counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City. If the Indemnitor fails to so defend the Action, the City shall have the right but not the obligation to do so and, if it does, the Indemnitor shall promptly pay the City’s full cost thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indemnity obligation under clause (i) of the first sentence of this condition shall not apply to the extent the claim arises out of the willful misconduct or the sole active negligence of the City.
3. CONSENT TO CONDITIONS. Within thirty (30) days after project approval, the owner or designee shall submit written consent to the required conditions of approval to the Community Development Director or designee.
4. FEES. The approval of MA21060 ( PUD-03, TTM36947M2) shall not become effective until all Community Development fees have been paid in full.
5. INCORPORATE CONDITIONS. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project, the owner or designee shall include within the first four pages of the working drawings a list of all conditions of approval imposed by the project’s final approval.
6. APPROVAL PERIOD – TENTATIVE TRACT MAP . Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 39647 shall expire on its current expiration date, November 19, 2023, unless within that period of time a final map shall have been approved and filed with the County of EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
Riverside Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder.
7. CONFORMANCE TO APPROVED EXHIBITS. The project shall be in conformance to the approved plans (listed below) with any changes in accordance to these conditions of approval:
a. Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 (n.d.);
b. Phasing Plan (dated June 2022);
c. Development Plan (dated December 2022);
d. Conceptual Landscape Plan (n.d.);
e. Preliminary Wall and Fence Plan (n.d.);
f. Maintenance Exhibit (n.d.)
g. Enlargement Plan – Parks (n.d.)
8. SUBMISSION OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. The Applicant shall submit a final development plan to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the grading permit. The final development plan, including but not limited to, architecture, landscaping, and amenities, shall substantially conform to the approved development plan.
9. MITIGATION MEASURES. This project shall be subject to, and comply with, all of the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Progra m adopted by Resolution No. 2017 -15 in connection with the adoption of an Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Emerald Ridge project.
10. GENERAL MAINTENANCE OF DEVELOPMENT. The development shall be maintained on an on -going basis including but not limited to, the removal of debris, weeds, abandoned vehicles, code violations, and any other factor or condition that may contribute to potential blight or crime.
11. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. The property owner shall maintain all landscaped areas as approved on the final landscape plans in an orderly, attractive and healthy condition. This shall include proper pruning, mowing of turf areas, weeding, removal of litter, fertilization, replacement of plants when necessary, and the regular application of appropriate quantities of water to all landscaped areas. The property owner shall maintain all irrigation systems as approved on the final landscape plans in proper operating condition. W aterline breaks, head/emitter ruptures, overspray or runoff conditions and other irrigation system failures shall be repaired immediately. The applicant shall maintain canopy trees in a manner that they provide the required shade coverage and encourages th e canopy to grow to provide shade. The applicant shall avoid topping trees or pruning the trees in a manner that the trees do not achieve mature height and form.
12. UNDERGROUNDING OF DRAINAGE. Driveway and parking areas shall not incorporate center swales, ri bbon gutters, concrete valleys, etc. All drainage in common and private use areas shall be underground and shall not incorporate open gutters or swales.
13. STREET TREES. All street trees shall be a minimum of 36” box trees.
14. FRONT YARD TREES. Each residential lot shall have a minimum of one (1) 24” box front yard tree, and one (1) 15-gallon front yard tree. Said trees shall be shown on the EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
final on-site landscape plans. For residential lots on which one (1) 24” box front yard tree, and one (1) 15-gallon front yard tree are not plantable, the Applicant may submit an alternate planting plan, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director.
15. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS.
Prior to the issuance of the grading permit , the aesthetic impact of slopes and grade differences where the project adjoins streets or other properties shall be approved by the Community Development Director.
16. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREA. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer prior to the recordation of the final map , providing for maintenance of the property in perpetuity. The CC& Rs shall, at a minimum, include provisions for the following items unless it is deemed unnecessary by the Community Development Director:
a. Formation of a Permanent Organization for the ownership and maintenance of all common areas including, but not limited to, landscaping, parking areas, and circulation systems (areas) in perpetuity.
b. The CC&Rs shall identify the common areas for ownership and maintenance.
The common areas shall include the following applicable items:
i. Access and Circulation Areas
ii. Parks
iii. Drainage Facilities
iv. Landscaping and Irrigation
v. On-site Lighting Fixtures
vi. Walls and Fences
vii. All on-site storm water and water quality management post -construction facilities and features (BMPs) shall require maintenance by the property owner(s). Regulations for operations and maintenance shall be cl early stated in the CC&Rs.
viii. A cross -lot drainage easement/agreement shall be required among parcel(s) if City Engineer deems it necessary.
ix. Other items the Community Development Director and City Engineer deem appropriate.
17. ON-SITE LANDSCAPING. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project, a “Professional Services” (PROS) application shall be approved by the Community Development Director. The PROS application shall include the following items:
a. Final (construction set) on-site landscape plans;
b. Completed City Agreement for Landscape improvements
c. City Faithful Performance Bond for Landscape improvements; performance bond shall be posted at 110% of the total cost approved estimate of EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
landscaping, irrigati on, labor, and one -year maintenance. The Community Development Director may consider a cash bond if appropriate.
Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the development project, the following events shall be satisfied in the order listed below:
a. Substantial Conformance Letter: The Landscape Architect of Record shall conduct an inspection and submit a letter to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department after the landscape architect has deemed the installation is in conformance to the approved plans; and b. City Inspection: The City landscape architect shall conduct an inspection of the installation to confirm the landscape and irrigation plan was constructed in accordance to the approved plans. Applicant shall pay any fees associate with the City inspection(s).
18. GRAFFITI PROTECTION FOR WALLS. Plans that include anti -graffiti coating or protection for the exterior side of all perimeter shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project . Graffiti shall be removed from the development within 24 hours.
19. TRASH COLLECTION.
a. An approval or clearance letter from the waste collection agency shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.
20. OUTDOOR LIGHTING. All outdoor l ighting fixtures shall be maintained in good condition. Light fixtures shall be downward facing , shielded to prevent any light from flooding onto adjacent properties, and reflecting into the sky.
A photometric plan and exhibits of lighting fixtures shall b e approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.
21. WALL AND FENCE PLAN. A Wall & Fence plan, including elevations, colors, and materials, shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.
22. MAILBOXES. The design of all mailboxes shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.
23. JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT (JARPD). Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project, the applicant shall ann ex into the existing Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (JARPD) District -Wide Community Facilities District (CFD) or form a new Community Facilities District (CFD) to contribute to the cost of park maintenance.
24. IMPACT FEES. The applicant shall pay th e following impact fees (unless exempt) in accordance to Title 3 of the Municipal Code:
a. Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program . The applicant shall pay any owed EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
DIFs by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.75 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
b. Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation (MSHCP) Fee. The applicant shall pay any owed MSHCP fees by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Municipal Code.
c. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program. The applicant shall pay any owed TUMFs by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.70 of the Municipal Code.
25. PARK DESIGN REVIEW. The two (2) public parks shall be designed to facilitate active play, healthy mobility, and social gathering. The final design of the two (2) public parks, including but not limited to, types walls and fencing, landscaping, seating areas, and play and exercise equipment shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential un it of the development project.
26. MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL RE-ALIGNMENT. The multipurpose trail along the western boundary of the project site shall be re-aligned to be entirely within the boundaries of the project site. If the trail cannot be re-aligned, the Applicant shall obtain a dedication from the adjacent property owner on whose property the trail is partially located. The applicant shall submit evidence of said dedication to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the grading permit.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
27. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (ENGINEERING)
27.1. The use hereby conditioned is for Change of Zone (CZ) No. 22009 (from PUD-02 to PUD-03) and Minor Change No. 2 to Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 (TTM36947) being a subdivision of:
APN 178 -070-006, that certain real property shown on Map of West Riverside, Book 9 Page 34 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, and Blk 1 of Loma Alta Tract, Book 6 Page 8 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, Excepting any portion included in the right of way of the San Pedro, Los Angles and Salt Lake Railroad;
APN 178 -070-007, that certain real property shown on Map of West Riverside, Book 9 Page 34 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, and Blk 1 of Loma Alta Tract, Book 6 Page 8 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, Excepting any portion included in Second Street;
APN 178 -120-001, that certain real property shown on Map of West Riverside, Book 9 Page 34 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, Blk 1 of Loma Alta Tract, Book 6 Page 8 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, and Map of portion of Rubidoux Rancho, Book 5 Page 169 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, Excepting any portion included in Alta Avenue; APN 179-060-002, Lot 6 and Lot 7 of Arthur Parks Tract, Book 1 Page 21 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, Lot 5 of Arthur Parks Tract, Book 1
and APN 178 -070-004 & APN 178 -120-002, that certain irrigation ditch or canal commonly known as the North Riverside and Jurupa Canal of Map of West Riverside, Records of Riverside County, Book 8 Page 43 of Maps, EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
Excepting any portion lying North of the lot line between Lot 3 and Lot 4 in Block 23 projected westerly across said canal of Map of West Riverside, Book 9 Page 34 of Maps, Records of Riv erside County, Also Excepting any portion lying southwesterly of the northeast line of Arthur Parks Tract, Book 1 Page 21 of Maps, Records of Riverside County.
Consisting of 44 acres, 10 lettered lots and 19 9 numbered lots for TTM36947. Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 prepared by Proactive Engineering Consultants (n.d.) hereby referenced.
27.2. An Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) is required to be prepared for this project for filing with the City Engineer at the time of recording the final Tract Map.
27.3. The project discharges into an existing basin southeast of the site owned by Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). A formal hydrology study is required to be submitted for RCFC&WCD’s review and approval.
27.4. It is assumed that any eas ements shown on the referenced exhibits are shown correctly and include all the easements that encumber the subject property. The Developer shall secure approval from all (if any) easement holders for all grading and improvements which are proposed over th e respective easement or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, easement holder cannot be found, or is otherwise of no affect. Should such approvals or alternate action regarding the easements not be provided, the Developer may be required to amend or revise the permit.
28. PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT (ENGINEERING)
28.1. No grading permit shall be issued until Change of Zone (CZ) No. 22009, and Minor Change No. 2 to Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 36947, and all other related cases are approved and are in effect unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
28.2. Onsite and offsite runoff is to be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
28.3. Prior to approval of the precise grading plan, the Developer shall prepare a detailed hydrology and hydraulics report corresponding with the detailed plans for grading, site development and street improvements for approval of the City Engineer.
28.3.1. An updated preliminary hydrology study dated September 16, 2021, prepared by Proacti ve Engineering Consultants, was provided to address the additional runoff from the proposed extension of Street “A” as shown on the tentative map.
28.3.2. The final hydrology and hydraulics report shall consider the run - off from Street “A” that flows westerly towa rds TR32721. The analysis shall demonstrate that the proposed and existing drainage facilities for TR32721 are adequately sized.
EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
29. PRIOR TO TRACT MAP RECORDATION (ENGINEERING)
29.1. No Final Map shall be recorded until Change of Zone (CZ) No. 22009, Minor Change No. 2 to Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 36947, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs), including the necessary Home Owners Association(s) (HOA); and Community Facilities District(s) (CFD) and/or Lighting & Landscape Maintenance District (LLMD), if any, associated with this subdivision are approved and in effect.
29.2. Phased units will be permitted with the City’s further consideration of the phase designations and limits. The City may impose reasonable conditions related to the filing of multiple maps consistent with SMA section 66456.1.
29.3. Lot access shall be restricted along the public rights -of-way. On the Final Map, the Owner shall dedicate abutter’s right of access along 28th Street, with the exception of access points as shown on the tentative map exhi bit and as approved by the City Engineer.
29.4. 28th Street along the project boundary and extending through Canal Street intersection is identified as a local road with an ultimate right -of-way width of 66-ft. The Developer shall dedicate property to a half -width right-of-way of 33-ft from the centerline to the property line. Required improvements shall include, but not limited to, the following:
29.4.1. 30-ft pavement section (18 -ft southerly and 12 -ft northerly of centerline measured from curb face to northerly edge of pavement);
29.4.2. 15-ft southerly parkway with an 8 -ft multi -purpose trail, curb adjacent landscaping, and curb & gutter;
29.4.3. Pockets of DG and drought-tolerant vegetation shall be provided within the southerly parkway of 28th Street between the roadway and the multi -purpose trail to allow pedestrians to access the multi-purpose trail from the street;
29.4.4. 5-ft wide landscape easement adjacent to the sout herly parkway;
29.4.5. The trailhead at the northwest end of 28th Street shall provide pedestrian connectivity to the trail along the western boundary of the project site . Developer shall coordinate with the Community Development Director for trail requirements;
29.4.6. Intersection of Canal Street (NS) and 28th Street (EW): The northbound and southbound approach of Canal Street shall be controlled by a stop sign.
29.5. Developer shall be responsible for the design of roadway widening improvements along 28th Street between Can al Street and Avalon Street to provide a 40-ft pavement section measured from curb face to curb face in an ultimate right -of-way width of 66 -ft. Prior to final map recordation, final design plans and cost estimate for the roadway widening along 28th Street shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Engineer. Developer shall be responsible for the construction of the following improvements:
EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
29.5.1. Pavement widening and 2 -inch cold -mill and overlay to centerline;
29.5.2. Reconnection of existing driveways;
29.5.3. Installation of new curb & gutter;
29.5.4. Any match up of asphalt concrete paving, reconstruction, and/or resurfacing of existing pavement as determined by the City Engineer.
29.5.5. In-lieu of construction at the time Developer will be required to pay a fee in -lieu of cons tructing improvements based on an estimated construction cost for grading, curb & gutter, AC pavement, signing, striping & pavement marking and driveway reconnections.
29.6. In-tract streets within TTM36947 will be public . Right-of-way widths shall be dedicated as shown on the TTM.
29.7. Alta Street as it may exist within the boundaries of the subdivision shall be vacated on the Final Map. Montana Avenue as it may exist within the boundaries of the subdivision shall be vacated on the Final Tract Map in consideration of the subdivider’s dedication of a 20 -ft wide easement for a multi-purpose trail along the westerly portion of the subdivision between the westerly tract boundary and the developed portion of the site.
29.8. Street A is classified as a local road and shall be dedicated as a public road.
The Developer shall be responsible for the design and construction of all required improvements within the subdivision and extending offsite to Muriel Street. Due to existing improvements, right -of-way limitations, and/or topographical conditions, Street A section improvements vary generally as follows:
29.8.1. Non-Residential Frontage: Ultimate right -of-way width of 52 -ft; 32-ft pavement width with new curb & gutter; a 6 -ft parkway along the easterly and southerly right -of-way to includ e landscaping; and a 14 -ft parkway along the westerly and northerly right-of-way to include curb adjacent landscape and 8 - ft concrete sidewalk/path.
29.8.2. Residential Frontage: Ultimate right -of-way width of 60 -ft; 36 -ft pavement width with new curb & gutter; a 12-ft parkway both sides to include curb adjacent landscape and 5-ft sidewalk.
29.8.3. TR32721 Frontage: Ultimate right -of-way width of 56 -ft; 36 -ft pavement width with new curb and gutter; a 6 -ft parkway along the southerly right -of-way to include landscaping; and a 14 -ft parkway along the northerly right -of-way to include curb adjacent landscape and 8-ft paved sidewalk/path.
29.8.4. Offset Cul-de-sac at the northeast end of Street “A” shall be per Riverside County No. 800A.
29.8.5. Pedestrian connectivity through the cul -de-sac shall be required to provide access to the multi -purpose trail along 28th Street.
Connection to the trail shall be by an 8-ft wide concrete walkway EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
in 20 -ft wide pedestrian easement with landscaping on both sides or as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director.
29.8.6. Corner extensions/Bulb-outs shall be installed along Street A as shown on the tentative map exhibit and design as approved by the City Engineer. Mid -block crossings shall not be permitted unless otherwise determined and ap proved by the City
Engineer.
29.8.7. Midwest Guardrail System shall be installed along Street A per the latest Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. Guardrail locations shall be approved by the City Engineer.
29.8.8. Prior to the effective date of the approval of the tentative map, Developer shall make and record an irrevocable offer to dedicate real property for public street and public utility purposes within the affected area outside the tentative map area as requir ed to construct Street A as shown on the referenced tentative map exhibit. If the irrevocable offer is not recorded within 24 months of the tentative approval of the tentative map or prior to approval of the first final map whichever occurs first, the tentative map approval shall be considered null and void.
29.8.9. Improvements shall provide appropriate transition to adjacent existing infrastructure; design of transition shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
29.9. Improvements at the intersection of La Ru e and La Canada Drive within the City’s right-of-way and outside of the UPRR right -of-way shall be required.
Improvements include, but not limited to, the following:
29.9.1. Pavement treatment; scope shall be determined at time of technical plan review.
29.9.2. Curb & gut ter, ADA complaint curb ramps, and landscaping or as determined by the City Engineer at time of technical plan review.
Improvement Plans
29.10. The Developer shall provide improvement plans for the required improvements for Street “A” and 28th Street within and b eyond the limits of this subdivision, and all other public streets within this project. All Improvement Plans are subject to detail review and approval by the City Engineer. Improvements shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
29.10.1. Construction of roadway; curb and gutter, AC pavement, and street lighting;
29.10.2. Parkway and landscaping improvements;
29.10.3. PCC sidewalk per Riverside County standard 401;
29.10.4. PCC driveway approaches per County Standard No. 207A for commercial and 207 for residential approaches;
29.10.5. Sewer, water and storm drain improvements.
EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
29.11. The Developer shall be responsible for any match up asphalt concrete (AC) paving, and reconstruction or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the City Engineer.
29.12. Separate traffic signing, striping and pavement marking plans for the required improvements shall be prepared based on extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project limits, or the limits of work necessary to join existing improvements. The Developer shall be responsible for any additional paving and/or removal of existing striping that might be required by the approved plan. The geometric improvements listed in Table A of these conditions shall be included on the plans.
Note: 1) Any offsite roadway widening required to provide the above geometrics shall be the responsibility of the Developer, or as approved by the City Engineer.
29.13. Separate streetlight plans shall be prepared for the frontage of the project including offsite improvements of Street A for approval of the City Engineer.
LED lumina ires shall be provided with lighting performance equivalent to that required per County standards for HPS type.
29.14. For landscaping within public road rights -of-way, separate landscape and irrigation plans shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer.
If landscaping maintenance (and/or trails) is to be included in a Community Facilities District (CFD) or Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District (LLMD), landscaping plans shall depict ONLY such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are to be placed within the public rights-of-way.
29.15. Developer shall design other various and miscellaneous improvements as shown on the final map, per City standards at various locations shown on the final map, and in accordance with the Table A of th ese conditions, not otherwise included in the fair share payments.
29.16. Developer shall, at no expense to the City, obtain dedications for all off -site right-of-way to construct improvements as shown on final map and Table A, not otherwise included in fair shar e payments. The dedication documents shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with recordation of the Final (Tract) Map and, where applicable, recording data shall be shown on the final map.
29.17. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a Site Developmen t Traffic Management Plan (SDTMP) shall be submitted the City Engineer and Community Development Director for approval. The SDTMP shall include, but not be limited to, approved routes for site development construction traffic to access the construction site, appropriate points of ingress/egress to the site, and staging areas. Approval of such plan may include restrictions, requirements and conditions to mitigate related impacts as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director.
L&LMD, CFD and Special Districts
29.18. The Developer shall form, or annex to, if one already exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) for operation and maintenance purposes of various improvements in the public right -of-way, as approved by the City Engineer.
The formation or annexation to a CFD shall be in a manner approved by the EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
City Engineer and City Attorney.
29.19. If a City -wide Community Facilities District (CFD) exists for City Public Safety Services, the Developer shall annex into the City -wide Community Facilities District (CFD) and if none exists or annexation is otherwise not reasonable, Developer shall form such CFD in order to provide funding for City Public Safety Services. The annexation to a City -wide CFD for Public Safety Services shall be in a manner appr oved by the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Utilities
29.20. Separate sanitary sewer and domestic water system improvement plans shall be prepared for required improvements for approval of the Rubidoux Community Services District (RCSD). Water system improvemen t plans showing the location of fire hydrants (see County Standard 400) off -site and on-site must also be approved by Riverside County Fire Department.
Necessary easements for sewer and water systems on -site, as determined by RCSD, shall be shown on the Fi nal Map “to be dedicated by separate instrument”.
30. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS (ENGINEERING)
30.1. All applicable required environmental mitigation measures shall be satisfied in accordance with the Environmental Impact Report.
30.2. A Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Community Development Director for approval. The CTMP shall include, but not be limited to, approved routes for construction traffic to a ccess the construction area, construction hours, staging areas, and appropriate points of ingress/egress to that area.
31. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION
31.1. The streetlights shall be fully operational.
31.2. The project’s fair -share contribution is $68,080, which corresponds to 53% of the total cost of the City’s estimate ($128,453). Developer shall pay a fair- share amount of $ 370 per single -family residential (SFR) dwelling unit toward mitigation of various intersection and roadway segment improvements as listed in Table A that is included with these conditions.
31.3. Prior to the issuance of the first (1st) Certificate of Occupancy of the first Final Map of TTM36947 (Emerald Ridge North), the Developer shall complete the design and construction of Street A offsit e improvements to connect with La Canada Drive at Muriel Drive and the required improvements of the intersection of La Canada Drive and La Rue Street.
31.3.1. Prior to the issuance of the twenty sixth (26th) Certificate of Occupancy of Final Map(s) of TTM36947 (Em erald Ridge
North), the Developer shall complete the design and
construction of the following:
EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
31.3.1.1. Street A and the portions of Street I, Street J and 28th Street connecting through the Canal
Street intersection;
31.3.1.2. The Developer shall complete the design and
construction, at no expense to the City, one at -
grade railroad crossing at Canal Street and 28th
Street as an official “Quiet Zone Crossing”, as
regulated by the U.S. DOT, Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA). T he at -grade crossing
shall be designed and constructed as to be
accepted as an official Quiet Zone Crossing,
even if the designation is not applied for during
this project.
31.4. Prior to the issuance of the 40 th Certificate of Occupancy of TTM36947 (Emerald Ridge North), the following amenities and basins associated with TTM36947 shall be constructed and completed:
31.4.1. Lot 196 (Basin)
31.4.2. Lot 197
31.4.3. Lot 198 (Park)
31.5. Prior to the issuance of the 110th Certificate of Occupancy of TTM36947 (Emerald Ridge North), the following amenities and basins associated with TTM36947 shall be constructed and completed:
31.5.1. Lot 185 (Trail)
31.5.2. Lot 186 (Park)
31.5.3. Lot 187 (Park)
31.5.4. Lot 188
31.5.5. Lot 189
31.5.6. Lot 190
31.5.7. Lot 192 (Basin)
EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
TABLE A FOR EMERALD RIDGE NORTH
TTM 36947 (MA21060)
INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY SEGMENT GEOMETRY
IMPROVEMENT AND MITIGATION LIST
Geometric Modification Description
Project-Specific Intersection Mitigation for Emerald Ridge North Project MA21060 (TTM36947)
Intersection of
Canal Street
(NS) and 28th Street (EW)
Modify geometries to provide:
NB: one shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane.
SB: one shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane.
EB: one shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane.
WB: one shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane.
Intersection of
Lot I/Westerly Driveway (NS)
and 28th Street (EW)
Modify geometries to provide:
NB: one right-turn lane.
SB: N/A.
EB: N/A.
WB: one left-turn lane.
Intersection of
Lot J/Easterly Driveway (NS)
and 28th Street (EW)
Modify geometries to provide:
NB: one shared left-turn/right-turn lane.
SB: N/A.
EB: one shared right-turn lane/through lane.
WB: one shared left-turn lane/through lane.
Fair-Share Payments for Emerald Ridge North Project
MA21060 (TTM36947)
Intersection of
Rubidoux Boulevard (NS)
and 30th Street/ SR-60 WB
Off-Ramp (EW)
Install geometries to
provide:
NB: one left-turn lane, two through lanes.
SB: two through lanes.
EB: one left-turn lane, one right-turn lane.
WB: two left -turn lanes, one shared through/right -turn lane.
Intersection of
Rubidoux Boulevard (NS)
and SR-60 WB On-Ramp (EW)
Install geometries to
provide:
NB: one left-turn lane, two through lanes.
SB: two through lanes, one right-turn lane.
EB: N/A.
WB: N/A.
EMERALD RIDGE NORTH (MA21060) REVISED: DECEMBER 7, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PUD-03, TTM36947M2)
Intersection of
Rubidoux Boulevard (NS)
and SR-60 EB Ramps (EW)
Install geometries to
provide:
NB: two through lanes, one right-turn lane.
SB: one left-turn lane, two through lanes.
EB: one left-turn lane, one right-turn lane.
WB: one left-turn lane, one right-turn lane.
Intersection of
Rubidoux Boulevard (NS)
and Mission Boulevard (EW)
Install geometries to
provide:
NB: one left -turn lane, one shared through/ right -turn lane.
SB: one left-turn lane, one through lane, one right -turn lane.
EB: two left-turn lanes, two through lanes.
WB: one left-turn lane, two through lanes, one right -turn lane.
The Applicant hereby agrees that these Conditions of Approval are valid, lawful, and binding on the Applicant, and its successors and assigns, and agrees to the Conditions of Approval.
Applicant’s name (Print Form): _
Applicant’s name (Signature):
Date:
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22009 FROM PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ( PUD) NO. 2 TO PUD -03, FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED NOR TH OF SR -60, WEST OF
CANAL STREET, SOUTH OF 28TH STREET, AND EAST OF
THE RIO VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN (APNS: 179 -060-002, 178-
070-004, -006, -007, 178-120-001, AND -002)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Background. On May 18, 2017, the Jurupa Valley City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017 -15 certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) for General Plan Amendment No. 15004, Change of Zone No. 15003, and Tentative Tract Map Nos. 36947 and 36948 (collectively, Master Application Nos. 15072 and 15148) to permit the development of approximately 68 gross acres into 281 single -family residential lots, 118 condominiums and several open space areas on real property located north of State Route 60, east of Rio Vista Specific Plan, south of 28th Street, and west of Avalon Street (APNs: 179-070-004, 006, 007; and 178-191-001, 002, 004, 015).
Section 2. Project. The Applicant seeks a Change of Zone from Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 02 to PUD -03 to enhance the previously approved architecture, reconfigure internal circulation, and expand the open space and trail network, and a Minor Change No. 2 to Tentative Tract Map No. 36947 to reconfigure previously approved lot lines to extend La Cañada Drive into the tract as the new secondary point of access instead of a railroad crossing at Alta Street (collectively, MA No. 21060).
Section 3. Project Procedural Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 21060 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On December 14, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on an Addendum to the Certified Environmental Impact Report and MA No. 21060, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolu tion No. 2022 -12-14-03 recommending that the City Council adopt an Addendum to the Certified Environmental Impact Report and approve MA No. 21060.
(c) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
-2-
Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) On January 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023 -08, adopting an Addendum to the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Emerald Ridge Residential Project. Resolution No. 2023-08 is incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
Section 5. Change of Zone.
(a) The Applicant seeks a Change of Zone from Planned Unit Dev elopment (PUD) No. 02 to PUD -03 to enhance the previously approved architecture, reconfigure internal circulation, and expand the open space and trail network. (b) Pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.238.080(1), the PUD zoning district may be approved only for a project that incorporates at least five of the following features:
1) Residential clustering that will provide for new neighborhoods combined with abundant open space.
2) Commercial development that provides products or services not currently available within the city.
3) Preservation of abundant natural open space.
4) The project will provide a substantial public amenity, for example, a significant public plaza, a public park, trails or a similar improved open space feature, including provisions for guaranteed long-term maintenance not at the expense of the city. 5) The project includes significant environmental benefits, such as preservation, enhancement and/or creation of a significant natural feature or open spaces with a minimum area of one-half (½) acre.
6) Additional public benefits and project amenities that advance the city's identified objectives and evolving visions as identified in the General Plan and Community Plans.
7) The project will achieve greater energy efficiency than standard developments through the incorporation of green building techniques, scoring at least a silver rating on the LEED or other equivalent rating system, or achieving a minimum of thirty (30) percent greater energy efficiency than the minimum required by California Code of Regulations Title 24.
8) The project provides for a significant saving of water usage over the life of the project.
9) Stormwater runoff controls.
-3-
(c) Pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.238.080(2), prior to the approval of a zoning amendment to add the PUD designation to a property, the following findings shall be made, along with the general findings required for a zoning amendment set forth in Sections 9.285.010, 9.285.020 and 9.285.030:
1) The project is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific and Community Plans;
2) The project complies with all applicable provisions of this chapter, except for those provisions modified by the PUD rezoning; 3) The approved modifications to the development standards of these Zoning Regulations are necessary and appropriate to accommodate the density and superior design of the proposed project;
4) The proposal would benefit the area surrounding the project to a greater degree than development allowed within the underlying zoning district(s), includi ng improved pedestrian or transit access to jobs, goods and services; 5) The proposal would provide mixed land use and/or site design flexibilities while enhancing site or building aesthetics to achieve an overall, workable, higher quality of development than would otherwise be possible under conventional zoning standards; 6) The project is compatible in use, size and type of structure, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout, with adjoining land uses, mitigates environmental impacts and can be integrated into the neighborhood; 7) The project complies with all applicable City Design Guidelines and provides adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash areas and storage, as necessary; 8) The project does not create traffic congestion, noise, odor or other adverse effects on surrounding areas;
9) All affected public facilities, services and utilities are adequate to serve the proposed project; and
10) The establishment, maintenance or operation of the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use, or detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city.
Section 6. Findings for Approval of Zone Change No. 22009 . The City Council hereby makes the following findings in approving Change of Zone No. 22009:
(a) Pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.238.080(1), the PUD zoning district may be approved only for a project that incorporates at least five of the following features:
-4-
1) The proposed project incorporates clustering through the inclusion of smaller lots ranging in size from 3,500 ft 2 to 8,500 ft2 combined with abundant open space in the form of public parks, trails, and landscaped slopes and hills; 2) The proposed project provides substantial public amenities including two (2) public parks, the 28 th Street trail, and the additional trail along the western boundary of the community. The amenities would be maintained on a long -term basis, not at the expense of the City.
3) The proposed project includes significant environmental benefit through the preservation and enhancement of over 12 acres of natural open space and features. 4) All landscape areas within the proposed project would include draught-tolerant trees and shrubs with a permanent irrigation system to minimize water use and runoff for the life of the project.
5) The proposed project provides for stormwater water runoff controls through the preservation of natural open space, and the development of off -street concrete channels, gutters, and stormwater basins.
(b) Pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code S ection 9.238.080(2), prior to the approval of a zoning amendment to add the PUD designation to a property, the following findings shall be made, along with the general findings required for a zoning amendment set forth in Sections 9.285.010, 9.285.020 and 9.285.030:
1) The project is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific and Community Plans . The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan in that the project site is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) that allows up to five (5) dwelling units per acre, and the project is proposing 4.2 dwelling units per acre; 2) The project complies with all applicable provisions of this chapter, except for those provisions modified by the PUD rezoning. ; 3) The approved modifications to the development standards of these Zoning Regulations are necessary and appropriate to accommodate the density and superior design of the proposed project. The proposed modifications to the development standards of the zoning regulations are necessary to accom modate the proposed density superior design of the proposed project in that they allow for residential clustering, and additional recreational and open space; 4) The proposal would benefit the area surrounding the project to a greater degree than development allowed within the underlying zoning district(s), including improved pedestrian or transit access to jobs, goods and services. The proposed project would benefit the area surrounding the project site in that it would provide for new pedestrian and vehicular connectivity, revitalize an inactivated area of the City, and create additional opportunities for recreation and healthy mobility;
5) The proposal would provide mixed land use and/or site design flexibilities while enhancing site or building aesthetics to achieve an overall, workable, higher
-5-
quality of development than would otherwise be possible under conventional zoning standards.
The proposed project would incorporate two (2) parks, and an enhanced trail system to achieve a higher quality of development than would otherwise be possible under conventional zoning standards;
6) The project is compatible in use, size and type of structure, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout, with adjoining land uses, mitigates environmental im pacts and can be integrated into the neighborhood. The proposed project is compatible with the adjoining land use in that it is similar in density, provides for a substantial amount of open space, and integrates its circulation with the nearby residential communities; 7) The project complies with all applicable City Design Guidelines and provides adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash areas and storage, as necessary. The proposed project complies with all applicable access, parking, landscaping, and tra sh pick -up requirements, as necessary.
8) The project does not create traffic congestion, noise, odor or other adverse effects on surrounding areas. The proposed project does not create traffic congestion, noise, odor or other adverse effects on surrounding areas; 9) All affected public facilities, services and utilities are adequate to serve the proposed project. The required facilities, services, and utilities including sewer, water, and trash pick-up are adequate to serve the project; and 10) The establishment, maintenance or operation of the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed use, or detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of current or future residents in that it is a low -intensity residential project, similar in density to the surrounding commun ities, and will revitalize an inactivated area of the City.
Section 7. Approval of Zone Change. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby rezones the real property located north of SR-60, west of Canal Street, south of 28th Street, and east of Rio Vista Specific Plan (APNS: 179-060-002, 178-070-004, -006, -007, 178-120-001, and -002) from PUD No. 2 to PUD-03, as depicted in Exhibit “A,” and directs the City Manager to revise the official Jurupa Valley Zoning Map to designate the properties as being in this new zone.
Section 8. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
Section 9. Effect of Ordinance . This Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside incorporated by the City of Jurupa Valley that may in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance.
-6-
Section 10. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall cert ify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.
Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 2nd day of February, 2023.
_____________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-7-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023 -02 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19 th day of January, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 2 nd day of February, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 2nd day of February, 2023.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Exhibit A
Revised Zoning Map
PUD-03
PUD-03
ATTACHMENT 4: PROJECT PLANS
/0/1/2/3/1/0/0/4/3/1/2/i255/6/7/1/8/9/10/11/12/1/11/8
/13/14/14/i255/8/15/16/17/18/i255/19/20/21/22/i255/8/17/23/24/24/17/25/i255/8/16/21/17/24/i255/26/14/14 /i255/6/15/23/15/22/20/25/i255/6/12/i255/27/13/28/28/13/i255/i255/29/27/30/31/32/i255/13/28/14/33/26/26/14/14 /34 /34/i255
/35/36/37/35/38/35/39/40/36/i255/35/42/38/43/35/i255/44/38/45/i255/37/46/47/i255/48/49/50/51/52 /43/39/35/53/i255/46/54/i255/55/56/42/56/45/38/i255/40/38/57/57/36/53/58/i255/43/46/56/37/35/53/i255/46/54/i255/42/39/40/36/42/59/39/60/36/58/i255/59/35/38/35/36/i255/46/54/i255/43/38/57/39/54/46/42/37/39/38/i255 /28/14
/12/19/19/0/1/61/0/61
/i255/0/62/3/8/11/63/i255/19/7/1
/11/12/1/12/i255/12/64/0/1/9/0
/i255/0/62/3/8/11/63/i255/19/7/1
/11/12/1/12/i255/12/64/0/1/9/0
/65/12/4/3/i255/6/3/4/6/10/0
/19/9
/4/3/0/10/i255/61/4/3/64/0
/10/7/11
/i255/12
/10/7/11/i255/66
/10/7/11/i255/6
/10/7/11/i255/61
/10/7/11/i255/67
/10/7/11/i255/2
/10/7/11
/i255/68
/10/7/11/i255/3
/10/7/11
/i255/12
/10/7/11
/i255/12
/6/12/1/12/10/i255/8/11
/69/0/1/70 /7/7/61/i255/71/10/12/65/12
/13/27/11/68/i255/8/11
/13/28/11/68/i255/8/11/4/0/0/11
/12/10/11/12/i255/8/11
/10/7/11/i255/0
/6/12/1/12/10/i255/8/11
/10/7/11/9/8/i255/8/11
/1/0/70/11/7/1/i255/8/11
/6/12/1/12/10/i255/8/11
/13/28/11/68/i255/8/11/4/0/0/11
/10/7/11/i255/12
/0/1/2/3/1/0/0/4/3/1/2/i255/6/7/1/8/9/10/11/12/1/11/8
/13/14/14/i255/8/15/16/17/18/i255/19/20/21/22/i255/8/17/23/24/24/17/25/i255/8/16/21/17/24/i255/26/14/14 /i255/6/15/23/15/22/20/25/i255/6/12/i255/27/13/28/28/13/i255/i255/29/27/30/31/32/i255/13/28/14/33/26/26/14/14 /34/35/36/34/37/34/38/39/35/i255/34/41/37/42/34/i255/43/37/44/i255/36/45/46/i255/47/48/49/50/51 /42/38/34/52/i255/45/53/i255/54/55/41/55/44/37/i255/39/37/56/56/35/52/57/i255/42/45/55/36/34/52/i255/45/53/i255/41/38/39/35/41/58/38/59/35/57/i255/58/34/37/34/35/i255/45/53/i255/42/37/56/38/53/45/41/36/38/37/i255 /28/14
/19/12/60/i255/61/0/11/12/3/10/8
/10/7/11
/i255/12
/10/7/11/i255/62
/10/7/11/i255/6
/10/7/11/i255/61
/10/7/11/i255/63
/10/7/11/i255/2
/10/7/11
/i255/64
/10/7/11/i255/3
/10/7/11
/i255/12
/10/7/11
/i255/12
/6/12/1/12/10/i255/8/11
/65/0/1/66 /7/7/61/i255/60/10/12/67/12
/13/27/11/64/i255/8/11
/13/28/11/64/i255/8/11/4/0/0/11
/12/10/11/12/i255/8/11
/10/7/11/i255/0
/6/12/1/12/10/i255/8/11
/10/7/11/9/8/i255/8/11
/1/0/66/11/7/1/i255/8/11
/6/12/1/12/10/i255/8/11
/13/28/11/64/i255/8/11/4/0/0/11
/10/7/11/i255/12
/i255/0/68/3/8/11/69/i255/19/7/1
/11/12/1/12/i255/12/70/0/1/9/0
/i255/0/68/3/8/11/69/i255/19/7/1
/11/12/1/12/i255/12/70/0/1/9/0
/4/7/61/0/7/i255/61/4/3/70/0
/10/12/i255/6/12/1/12/61/12/i255/61/4/3/70/0
/67/12/4/3/i255/6/3/4/6/10/0
/8/11/4/0/0/11/i255/12
/13/28/11/64/i255/8/11
/19/9
/4/3/0/10/i255/61/4/3/70/0
/13/28/11/64/i255/8/11
/0/0/1/i255/3/4/5/6/7
/8/9/10/11/12/13/14/i255/15/16/9/12/17/12/0
/15/1/15/18/10/19/20/i255/18/12/20/14/15/21/13/22/18/0/9 /23/24/25/26/i255/27/28/27/27
;
-E
4;<0E
6;
E
;
-E
;
6
E
;"-E
<
0E
<
1E
.4
,&
(f,
+"f
)
1$"f!" '!6.62f
,.09f41""f
%-*1W<?AQTZ<
'3152f$1.7"f
&OUVT_A@f*AcAVY
41""f (623"12f.-f2).0"f
,
*1),
-#+
(1').
&)
"7"1$1"",f2/" &*"-f31""f
-(-*1)
&#
1
@0&E
1A<MHERA@f"aIY[HREf*]N[H/]VUTYAf3V<HNf*TR\<R<f
_AR^Af/TV[ITRf\Tf1AO<HS
7AFH>NAf+<HR\AR<R>Aff5[HMH[cf
>>AYYf"<YAPAR\
f
TS>VA\Af7!I\>Gf/AVf H_HMf"SEHRAAVYf0M<RY
f
.UASf4^VC
f
AR>Ff2A<[IRE
f
f8H@Af TR>VA[Af/<[F
f
0<YYI_Af.UASf2U<>Af`I\Ff0I>SI>f4<=MAf2A<\HREf2[<=HNIdA@f!A>TOUTYA@f $V<SI\Af/<_HSEfHRff TR>VA\Af ]V=f"@EAf<S@f3VAAf/I\YfBTVf H[V^Yf$VT_A f
"aIY\HREf ANMf4T`AV
I\cf2H@A`<MKf0AVf I_HNf"REHSAAVYf/N<SY
^V=f1<PUf<R@f4V<DH>f <NOHREf/TU.^\
f/AVf H_HMf"SEHSAAVYf/M<SY
A(.0 7A
1<)A*/A/2A
2 8 2A8$,AA%-A 6:%
)A
&"#9A&,A.+ /?, 37A4&>8 A.8A7#((A
A
(-8 A-
A53&"9
A 3A/=,8@A.!A'> 37&
A;-
2
7
<
.#E
;=E
;
#-E
;;E ;E
5<01E 5;1E
6<#
E
6<
E
>;
0E
.+*.,f-
+"f 2&;"f 231""42f41""2f f2\VAA[f3VAAf/AVf(T[f
*+
1
%%*
*1
<MNIBTVRI<f2c><OTVAf f
Taf 2[<S@<V@f
&'
&*+$&%1&%(-*1
-)-*1!/1
#(.8"1&,$f
",3f41""f
)AOTRf f$<N
f 2[<S@<V@f
(*,)&$
1
%
2+
)(f31""f)
1$"f2%16
f
8AY\AVRf%<>K=AVVcf f$<N
f 2[<S@<V@f $--*1%1*AaH><R<f
]Y\V<MH<Sf8HMNT`f f$<N
f 2[<S@<V@f
+)&$"*1(-,
&"
1
T<Y[f)H_Af.<Lf f
Taf 2[<S@<V@f
TS>VA\Af2I@A`<MKf0AVf H_HNf"REHRAAVYf0M<RY
f
1A\<ISHSEf+2"f8<MNYf/AVf I_HMf"SEHSAAVYf/N<SY
f2AAf2GAA\f(fBTVf8<MMf<R@f
#AR>Af/N<SYf<R@f!A\<HNYf
I\cf+<HR\<ISA@f(<S@Y><UA@f0<VK`<c
f2AAf2FAA[f)fCTVf*<HR\AR<R>Af"aFH=I\f
2\VAA[f)IEF[f0AVf I_HNf"REHSAAVYf0N<SY
f
#HVAf%c@V<R\Yf0AVf I_HNf"REHSAAVYf/N<S
f
0A@AY[VI<Rf VTYYf8<MKf0AVf H_HNf"REHRAAVYf0M<RY
f
f8I@Af TR>VA\Af*]M\H/]VUTYAf4V<HN
f
f8I@Af2[<=HNIdA@f!A>TOUTYA@f$V<RH[Af+^N[H0]VUTYAf3V<HN f8I@Af TR>VA\Af/A@AY\VH<Sf/<YATf TSSA>[HTSf#VTOf
\Gf2[VAA\
A
A A
;
-0E
<
2E
4;< E
5<( E
:5!E 655E
;
;E
<
0/E
;&
E
;
AE
4;0
E
5;!4E
5<
5E
FISAYAf0HY\<>FAf
VHY=<SAf
Taf
%TNMcf.<Kf
V<UAf*cV[MAf
N^Af"M@AV=AVVcf
3TcTRf
;'<E
f
Taf
f
Taf
f
Taf
f
Taf
f$<M
f
f$<M
f
;
0E
<
BE
6<40E 6;55E
<
E
6;00E
5;34E
5<(/E
5<##E 4;'
E
A
6<
(E
3 ()f2%15
2f
2\<R@<V@f (-,-*1-%&1 TPU<>\<f
)'%,(
1"
&(%
1
2\<R@<V@f
%#"
1(
%&*1
+)&$#*1)-,
&#
1
2\<R@<V@f
$%-*1
&)%
1
1TPRAc<f>T^N[AVHf
*"!'6*f2%15
2f
2\<R@<V@f
+)
'"/1
0$%#0+(1
)
*1/1+)%1
-$1)
%*1
2\<R@<V@f
-'
&)
1)
1
2\<R@<V@f %
%11*TTRf
<cf3+f
#.
1(
1 #.
1"-%,
12<R\<f
<V=<V<f
4A]>VH^PfCV^\H><SYf
4;$ E
6;E
?-E
5;!4E
66-;E
!`<VBf2\V<`=AVVcf3VAAf
]YGf
RAPTSAf
!AYAV\f"S>AMH<f
4TcTSf
TCBAA=AVVcf
+<\HNIJ<f0TUUcf
!AYAV\f%TNMcf
4FTOUYTRf
<>>F<VHYf
0VI@AfTCf+<@AIV<f
:AMNT`f/]VEAf
%A<_ARMcf
<P=TTf
][^PRf2<EAf
+AaH><Rf
^YGf2<EAf
]YGf$AVP<S@AVf
!
! !
! !!!
;
60E
=
2E
<
DECE ;
")E ;
(E
=
;E
6<"
E 6<"-E 5<#;E 6;&
E 6;*
E
6;E 4;%0E 5<(
E
4;*
E
7;&
E 4;";E 6;#1E
46-0E
59-
E 64-
E 550+E
56-
E 8/-;E:-!E
660E
8,0 'E
(.8f2%16
2f
-!f$1.6-! .7"1f
1(&%*1!AYAV[f <VUA\f
"#1bf*TTSYGISAf
(+$
*
11 <ScTRf$V<cf
%,%1/1,A`f$TN@f
&*$)
%-*1Tf%]R\HRE[TSf <VUA[ef
"-42f
,!f$1
22"2f
<XAbf
.-#*1
*')#&1'12<R@I<f$MT`f
-
#%)
1(
%*1
3]VBf%c@VTYAA@f4VIUMAf VT`Rf
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
f
3V<HMHSEf
><>H<f
:<VVT`f
<MHCTVSI<f2<EA=V^YFf
,A`f$TM@f(<R\<R<f
1TYAP<Vcf
AVLAMAcf2A@EAf
2<R@H<f$NT`f1A@f:]>><f
!AAVf$V<YYf
3VHUMAf VT`Rf3<MNf#AY>^Af
*
$1&
,
.0'1
!1%
1
1-) (1+-1)
"1
/
# 1
::
:
:
"
*
:
:
:
:
: :
7:
:
6$
#: !: :
):: "
:
_4SY=TA_4RKFW_!=?A_0GK=VXAT_\FWD_ A?QT=XG[A_
=R_=X_
QTPAUV
_ [AT]__
_5=KL_4RKFW_!=?A_4FOCKA_4F@A
1Y>KF?_!=?GPC_
KQ?I_:=KL_\FWD_ A?QT=XG[A_
=R
_
QLQT_5=O
_
_5=KL_9GO]L_4F@A_=P@_3A=U_;=T@_0TF[=?]_!AO?A
_
QLQT_:DFWA
_
QTPAU_+QOYMAPW_4GCO=CA_:=KL_\FWD_ A?QT=XG[A_1GK=VXAUV_
3AX=GPGPC_:=KL_RAU_
G[GK_ OCGPAATV_0L=PV
_
_5=KL_6Z>ZK=U_4XAAL_!AP?A
_
QKQU_
K=?J
_
+A?D=PG?=LK]_4X=>GLF^A@_ =UXE_+4 _3AX=GPGPC_:=LK
_0AU_
G[GK_ PCGPAAT
_
+=GPWAP=P?A_
??AVV_"=XA_=X_:=WAT_2Y=KFW]_
=VGP_
_5=KL_
3=GL_9FP]L_6U=GK_!AO?A_=O@_
=UTFAT_\FWD_
+7_0GK=VWAT_5ATNGPZV_=X_
EGK@UAPV_6QX
)QX_
TA=
_
_5=KL_4QZP@_:=LK_0AU_6U=?W__
RRTQ[A@_1K=OV
_
4=BAX]_3=GKHOC_
XQR_,4 _3AX=GPFPC_:=LK_0AU_
G[GK_ PCGPAATV_0L=PV_
&:
8:
(:
(:
"(*
!
#
*
$
*
"
)*
'
%:1*5#:43*+-2,:
!
*
*
"
*
#
*
!
*
&
*
#
*
"
*
$*
%"*
""*
'%:0*5:
.:
:
.:
:
/:
"*
'"*
#*
!:
#_40)'6_!
_0&)
45 3_
:'6$_
/3
5&9 _
0_
_6
)*_40*'5_!
_4&-"* _4' _18
*&
_!
'-"
/.
3 6 _
)/
(_:
*)_:'6$_
/3
5&9 _
0_
_:' _57
7)
3_46 *_4' _
- _3
3_
<
3 _
44_"
6 _:_+ 4%_
_5
*)_68
8*
3_45 )_! -
_ _6
)*_1
9 _4' _
. _3
3_<
3 _03'9
;_! -
_
!!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!
!!
!
( (
(
$
(
((
(
(
& (
9:
_6
)*__3
'*_19
_! -
_
!
!!
!
(
(
$
(
((
(
%(!"' #(
(
(
"(
(
:
*
$1&
,
.0'1
!1%
1
1-) (1+-1)
"1
/
# 1
;0W
8;;5W
5 3 5 7; W
775W
;7W
;0
W
7=5 1W
;
W
;5W
=*W
=6
W
5
9 5)W
5,-
0 5 5&"5#"
24
1 A
*16<*16-,A 8-6A%8*+-A
*6=.*+<=:-,A%378-;A
7<;A
A
A
A
A A
A
*16<*16-,A
7<A "*;;1>-A"*:2A
A
*16<*16-,A
7<A A"*;;1>-A"*:2A
A
*16<*16-,A
7<A A013,:-6;A"*:2A?1<0A&7<
7<A
!A1<@A
*16<*16-,A)*<-:A#=*31<@A*;16;A
7<;A
A A A
!A
$"A
*16<*16-,A
=3<1"=:87;-A&:*13A
"*:2?*@A*6,A
*6,;+*8-A*;-5-6<A376/A
<0A%<:--<A
7<;A A A A
;
W
;&0W
7=56W
7;&
W
7;0W
5
87?)W
77=W
;>W
;W
7;6W
7= W
A*+A
A*+A
A*+A
A*+A
A*+A
A*+A
!A1<@A
*16<*16-,A
=3<1"=:87;-A&:*13A376/A
*A*6*,*A:1>-A*6,A
*6,;+*8-A"*:2?*@;A
A*+A
7<AA0*66-3A 7<A6+3=,-,A16A
*16<-6*6+-A*3+=3*<176A&7A$-5*16A16A *<1>-A76,1<176 &7<*3A A+:-;A
&
&5+
5%'
5
;H!W
;05W
="5W
8PQJW
7=+
#W
77;>W
777W
=52W
;,
=W
;) W
;RW
8;5 W
7>$8W
7= 7W
777
KW
786;W 7765W
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
5 >
W
$)/5
.!(5
%9A<A
%9A<A
%9A<A
%9A<A
%9A<A
%9A<A
%9A<A
%9A<A
5
7=75W
= W
8;55W
78; W
7778W
5
8773W
CCNW
5 887W
775;W
&$%A
%&$&A
&%A
'
A&4"'$" %A&$
A"( A
A
7;0@W
5
8;'JW
8;SW
8;3W
= 5W
;E5W
<J W
=+&W ;&-W
; +W =IW
5
7>V8W
8;AW
873;W
OD6MW
775
GW
7=&&W
7;(
5W
7=.W
770
FW
8737W
8743W
CULW
7TW
W
8;- W 8;)
W
5
873W
773W
;
3W
8;&;W
:0%W
70W
7;&6W 7=&&W
800;W
785W
5
=W
8;B
W
775
/W
A
A
A
A
*A
*A
%9A<A
A
!
! !
! !!!
&$%A
%&$&A
&%A
'
A&4A"'$" %A&$
A"( A
A
A
A
!
!
!
!
!
!!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
"*05
5 *A
*A
%9A<A
*,:3
B6"%<
>@7
B-B4)--&. B
B=9
+8(B;=B9/#1B?+20!B
' 19/AB
B5$B
B
%W8N=827[*JD?7[)JJ:[*SOU5TVN8[X@S=[&@5H?5[+24E8[*82T?H< ! [0?78[#87@VF[NJJF[$2SVO2E[
O2Y[
?I@R>[JI5N8S8['2S=X2Y
" %L8H[,UO;[O82[:JO[ I;JNF2D[&E2Y
# '@5I@5[$J78[X@S>[ '@5H?5[+24D8[*82S?H<
[0?78[#87@VF[NJJF[$2SVO2E[
O2Y[
AI@R>[JI5N8S8[*@78X2DC [
=?E7N8IR[,JT!JS[X@S>[#VET@LD8[<8[
NJVL['E2Y[
MV?LG8IS[2I7[
)V448N[*VQ25?H< [
H=2I587['2W?I<[X@S=[[ JH5O8S8[2H7[2I7[*5JO8BJ@ITR[@I *MU2N8['2ST8NH [
8H5>[*82T@I<[O82 [
UO4[)2FL[X?T>[,NUI52T87[JF8
[
*TN@L87[OJRRX2EC
[
+O2R>[)858LT25D8
[
[0?78[JI5N8T8[VN4[ 8278N [
[*MV2N8[#-[ DJ5C['?E2RS8O [ *88[*>88S["[ JH58LTV2D[02DE[ 3H7[
9I69[&E3 I[ :KO [9S2@DR
[
*TN88T["?<=TR
[&8O[?W?E[
I<?H88OR['D2HR[
[
JH5O8T8[/?T5>[2H7[)8S2@IAI<[02ED[4Y[%T=8OR[ [
[+2ED[)2?D[/@HYD[
8H58[X@S=[#-[ DJ5C['@D2RS8O[2S[,8OF?HUR [
[+2ED[,U4UE2N[*T88D[
8H58 [ *88[*=88S[![JH58LTV2D[02DE[2I7[
8H58['D2H[:JN[8S2@DR
[
[0?78[+V4UD2N[*S88E[#2@IT8I2I58[558RR[
2S8R [
*T24?E@Z87[85JFLJR87[
O2H?T8[&2W?H<[X@T>[[0?78[JI5N8S8[
UO4[
7<?H<
[
[+2ED[#.[ EJ5C[&N?W25Y[02DE
[*88[*=88S[![JI58LSU2D[02DE[
2H7[
8I58[&E2I[;JO[8S2?ER [
(*.3
3)
3
3+--%0 3+*
' .3+,'
3(*.3
3+*
' .3+,'31%.$3
$%(
, )-3.*.(*.33[+2ED[/@IYD[*?78[2H7[)82O[12O7[
8I58
[*88[*>88T[ "[JI58LSU2E
02ED[2I7[
8I58['D2H[:JO[8S2?ER
[
P
[
3
[
[
[
[
[
3
(*.3
33
-%)
3(*.3
3
-%)3
.,
.3
33&/,/+30(( 23
3
[
/8<8S2T87[02S8O[(V2E@SY[2R?H [
*T24AE@Z87[85JFLJR87[
O2H?T8[#2?HS8H2H58[558RR[N?W8 [
558HS[&E2ITAI< [
$-
-+)#)!- *+-)%
'-,#'%
-
"
')& -
-(
-
-
ATTACHMENT 5:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-12-14-03
Section 4. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 21060 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and .Turupa Valley Ordinances.
(b) On December 14, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 21060, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters.
Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. (c) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occw-red.
Section 5. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Pmsuant to the CaUfornia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Cal.
Pub. Res. Code §21000 et seq.) and the State Guide! ines (the "Guidelines") ( l 4 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff has considered the potential environmental impacts of Change of Zone No. 22009 and Minor Change No. 2 for Te ntative Tract Map No. 36947 ("Project"). City staff has also reviewed the Initial Study and Final Environmental Impact Report (FElR) prepared for Tentative Parcel Map No. 36947 and certified by the City Council on May 18, 2017, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) adopted by the City Council on May 18, 2017, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted by the City Counci I on May 18, 2017. Based on that review, the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department determined that the Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, and that the Project does not involve new information of substantial importance which shows that the Project will have significant effects not discussed in the prior FEIR.
(a) Based upon the analysis of potential environmental consequences anticipated to occm as a result of Project implementation, the Planning Commission has determined that the Project would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the FEIR. For these reasons, the Project would not satisfy any of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines §15162 that warrant preparation of a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines § 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, allows an addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Repo1t (ElR) to make minor technical changes or additions based on proposed changes to a project.
Therefore, an Addendum to the FEIR (Attachment 1) has been prepared for the project per CEQA
Guidelines §15164.
(
c) The custodian of records for the FEIR and Addendum, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon whjch the Planning Commission's
PC Reso. No. 2022-12-14-03
(b)
Chair Jackson, Chair Pro Tem Shultz, Commissioners
Newman and Pruitt
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.A
APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council consider the applicant presentations and ratify Mayor Chris Barajas’ appointment to the Planning Commission , which shall expire in December, 2026.
2) That the City Council consider the applicant presentations and ratify Council Member Brian Berkson’s appointment to the Planning Commission , which shall expire in December, 2026.
3) That the City Council consider the applicant presentations and ratify Council Member Armando Carmona ’s appointment to the Planning Commission , which shall expire in December, 2026.
BACKGROUND:
Mayor Chris Barajas appointed Planning Commissioner Penny Newman on December 20, 2018. He may re -appoint Ms. Newman for an additional four -year term or he may nominate one member to fill the scheduled vacancy, which expires in December 2026.
The nomination shall be ratified by a majority vote of the entire City Council.
Council Member Bri an Berkson appointed Planning Commissioner Arleen Pruitt on December 20, 2018. He may re-appoint Ms. Pruitt for an additional four-year term or he may nominate one member to fill the scheduled vacancy, which expires in December 2026. The nomination shall be ratified by a majority vote of the entire City Council.
Due to Council Member Lorena Barajas’ unsuccessful re-election, Council Member-Elect Armando Carmona will be asked to make a new appointment, which expires in December 2026. The nomination shall be ratified by a majority vote of the entire City Council.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
ANALYSIS
Section 2.35.020 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that each member of the City Council shall nominate one member of the Planning Commission which nomination shall be ratified a majority vote of the entire City Council. Section 2.35.030.A. provides that the “term of each member of the Planning Commission shall be for four (4) years or until their successors are appointed and sworn in as members of the Planning Commission, whichever is later.”
On December 5, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2013 -11, amending Section 2.35.030.E which provides that “ Each year the City Council shall reconfirm the appointment of each Planning Commissioner.” Section 2.35.030.E.2. provides that each Planning Commissioner shall be “reconfirmed by a majority vote of the entire City Council.” Section 2.35.030.E.3. provides that:
“If a Planning Commissioner is not reconfirmed by a majority vote of the entire City Council, then at the time of this vote the Planning Commissioner shall be deemed removed from the Planning Commission, the Planning Commissioner’s term and tenure as a member of the Planning Commission shall end, and a vacancy shall exist for that position.” If a Planning Commissioner’s term is expiring, or if a vacancy should occur on the Planning Commission by resignation or failure to be reconfirmed, the positions shall be filled by appointment of a new member by the City Council pursuant to the procedures of subsection A of Section 2.35.020.
The noticing procedures outlined in Section 2.35.020(A) require that not less than ten (10) working days before the City Council appoints a person to a position on the Planning Commission, the City Clerk shall post a notice that the Council intends to appoint a member or members to the Planning Commission and inviting qualified persons to apply for the position or positions. The notice shall be posted on the City’s website, in the City Clerk’s office, and at the loc ations for the posting of ordinances and resolutions as established by resolution of the City Council. These locations shall include the Glen Avon Library and the Louis Robidoux Library.
Resolution No. 2011 -44 provides further detail concerning these requ irements. These provisions include the requirement that any letters of interest received will be public documents, the City Clerk will distribute the letters of interest received to the City Council at the end of each working day during the notice period, and that all persons interested in being appointed will have the opportunity to address the City Council prior to an appointment being made. Section 2.E. of Resolution No. 2011-44 also provides that “The Council may consider any qualified person for appo intment to the Planning Commission whether or not such person submitted a letter of interest to the Council.”
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.B
MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 22051: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 FOR 118 CONDOMINIUMS ON
APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH STREET (APN: 162-230- 012); (APPLICANT: CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC)
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt one of the following proposed resolutions to approve or deny Master Application No. 22051:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF 118 CONDOMINIUMS ON
APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH STREET AND APPROVING A
PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FINDING THAT NO
FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APN: 162-230-012) OR
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DENYING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 22051, A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38257 AND A NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PERMIT A SCHEDULE “A” SUBDIVISIO N OF APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH STREET
(APN:162-230-012)
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.C
APPOINTMENT OF CITY DELEGATE FOR THE 2023 SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG ) ANNUAL
REGIONAL CONFERENCE AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council select a Delegate and Alternate for the SCAG General Assembly meeting on Thursday, May 4 - Friday, May 5, 2023 at the JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort in Palm Desert, California.
BACKGROUND
The Southern California Association of Governments, founded in 1965, is a Joint Powers Authority under California state law, established as an association of local governments and agencies that voluntary convene as a forum to address regional issues. Under federal law, SCAG is designated as a Metropolitan Planning Organization and under state law as a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and a Council of Governments. SCAG develops long-range regional transportation plans as well as housing needs allocations and a portion of the South Coast Air Quality management plans.
SCAG is governed by delegates from every member city, county, and County Transportation Commission (CTC) through the General Assembly, which annually brings together the official representatives of SCAG’s membership and helps sets the agency’s course for the coming year.
ANALYSIS
Each city/county delegate to SCAG's General Assembly will also have an opportunity to bring any policy matter, in the form of a proposed resolution or proposed SCAG bylaw revision, before the General Assembly for determination. The deadline to submit proposed resolutions and/or SCAG bylaw revisions is 5:00 p.m., Friday, February 3, 2023.
All proposed resolutions and/or bylaw revisions will be reviewed by SCAG's Bylaws and
RETURN TO AGENDA