Cities Index.
Agenda, regular meeting, second session

Jurupa Valley City Council
January 19, 2023

Document
Agenda, regular meeting, second session
Meeting
January 19, 2023
Body
Jurupa Valley City Council
Pages
59
Original file
130.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.jurupavalley.org. That file is the official record.

Page - 1 -

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, January 19, 2023
Closed Session: 6:00 p.m.

Regular Session: 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

2. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.

B. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.

C. If the Meeting is conducted via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e), the public may submit comments to the City Council via email or via telephone prior to the Mayor calling the item. Email comment shall be sent to:

[email protected]. Telephone comments may be made by calling (951) 332- 6464, Ext. 140. Email and telephone comments are subject to the same rules as in-person comments.

D. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

E. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.

Page - 2 -

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL LITIGATION.

The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City from Century Communities of California, LLC, with respect to its application to construct condominiums at the s outhwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street, Lot 7 and Lot 9 of PA 2 of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan. On file in the Office of the City Clerk and attached to the Agenda is the December 1, 2022 letter from attorney Ryan Leaderman of Holland a nd Knight representing Century Communities of California objecting to the proposed denial of the Projects and threatening litigation against the City.

3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS I N CLOSED

SESSION

4. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

5. INVOCATION

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

8. PRESENTATIONS
A. INTRODUCTION OF HUMAN RESOURCES STAFF
B. QUARTERLY UPDATE – HEALTHY JURUPA VALLEY
C. QUARTERLY UPDATE – JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE
D. PRESENTATION OF THE CITY’S ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE
FINANCIAL REPORT (ACFR) – PRESENTED BY JESSICA ANDERSEN,

CPA, PARTNER, EIDE BAILLY LLP

9. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

Page - 3 -

10. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

11. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDIN G

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. UPDATE ON THE INLAND REGIONAL ENERGY NETWORK
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 17, 2023

B. MAYOR PRO TEM GUILLERMO SILVA

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - REGIONAL
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF JANUARY 9, 2023

2. UPDATE ON THE NORTHW EST MOSQUITO AND VEC TOR
CONTROL DISTRICT MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 2023

C. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. UPDATE ON THE RIV ERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ORTATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2023

2. UPDATE ON THE NORTHWEST TRANSPORT ATION NOW
COALITION MEETING OF JANUARY 12, 2023

3. UPDATE ON THE METROL INK / SOUTHERN CALIF ORNIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHOR ITY – AUDIT AND FINA NCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 2023

4. UPDATE ON THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION

REDUCTION REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY
19, 2023

Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.

Page - 4 -

12. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. DECEMBER 15, 2022 REGULAR MEETING

14. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN

THE AGENDA

Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.

B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$4,286,249.70

Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated November 22, 30 and December 7, 14, 21, and 28, 2022 as well as the payroll registers dated November 25, 30 and December 9, 23, and 31, 2022.

C. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-22

Requested Action: That the City Cou ncil conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-22, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO

ESTABLISH A NEW AIRPORT ZONE CLASSIFICATION, ESTABLISH

PERMITTED LAND USES AND DEV ELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

THE AIRPORT ZONE, AND MAKE OTHER CONFORMING CHANGES
TO TITLE 9 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE, AND
FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3)

OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES

D. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-23

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-23, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONES OF
APPROXIMATELY 138.86 COMBINED ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 4130 MENNES AVENUE FROM MANUFACTURING

HEAVY (M -H), MANUFACTURING -SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M -SC),

Page - 5 -

GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R -3), AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL (R -4)

ZONES TO AIRPORT (AIR) ZONE, AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION
FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA

GUIDELINES

E. REAFFIRM FINDINGS AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO MEET IN

WHOLE OR IN PART BY TELECONFERENCING UNDER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DURING THE COVID -19

STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCY

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-01, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE

CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH A TELECONFERENCE OPTION

FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND TH E PUBLIC DUE TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY AND THE CITY
COUNCIL’S DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e), AND MAKING FINDINGS

AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME

F. AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY

RECORDS

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-02, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF

CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS

G. INITIATION OF A ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND
CHAPTER 9.275 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE
PETAINING TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES; CEQA
DETERMINATION: THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT AND THE CITY’S LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B) (3)
Requested Action: That the City Council initiate a Zoning Code Amendment to amend Chapter 9.275 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code pertaining to Wireless Communication Facilities (WCFs).

Page - 6 -

H. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT ZCA 22004 (SHORT -TERM RENTALS) -

INITIATION OF A N AMENDMENT TO THE JURUPA VALLEY

MUNICIPAL CODE (JVMC) TO CLARIFY AND CODIFY THE

PROHIBITION OF SHORT -TERM RENTALS (STRS) IN ALL
RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICTS; CEQA DETERMINATION: THE

PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND THE CITY’S

LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061 (B) (3)

Requested Action: That the City Council initiate a Zoning Code Amendment to codify the prohibition of Short -Term Rentals (STRs) in all residentially zoned districts.

I. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF TWO FORD F -150 V6 ECO BOOST

PICK-UP TRUCKS FROM CITRUS FORD

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purch ase of two 2023 Ford F-150 EcoBoost V6 Pick Up Trucks, at the cost of $89,822.48 utilizing funding from the Assembly Bill 2766 ("AB 2766") Program ("Program") of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, (“SCAQMD”), included in FY 2022-23 Budget.

J. AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE

JURUPA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TO PR OVIDE GRAFFITI

ABATEMENT SERVICES ON PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY

1. That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and the J urupa Community Services District for graffiti abatement services on private property for an amount not to exceed $80,000.00 per each fiscal year and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

2. That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and the Jurupa Community Services District for graffiti abatement services in the public right-of-way for an amount not to exceed $20,000.00 per each fiscal year and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

K. ACCEPTANCE OF ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT (ACFR) AUDITED BY INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, EIDE BAILLY

Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file the ACFR audited by the City’s Independent Auditors, Eide Bailly (CPAs).

Page - 7 -

L. AWARD CONSTRUCTIO N AGREEMENT TO IE GENERAL
ENGINEERING INC. OF BEAUMONT, CA FOR SUNNYSLOPE AREA
SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE, CIP #19107

1. That the City Council approve and award a construction agreement to IE General Engineering Inc. of Beaumont, CA. in the amount of $2,246,197.00 for the Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure, CIP #19107, for the work included in its bid proposal and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the form attached hereto.

2. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related minor amendments to the Agreement with IE General Engineering, Inc., up to 10% as contingency to cover the cost o f any unforeseen conditions.

3. That the City Council a uthorize the City Manager to record the Notice of Completion upon acceptance of the work by the City Engineer.

15. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

16. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA)
NO. 22118: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38258 FOR 35 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.62

ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO
JURUPA DRIVE AND BEACH STREET (APN: 162-230-014); (APPLICANT:

CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC)

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and consider adopting Resolution No. 2022-03, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38258 AND NEIGHBORHOOD
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF 35
DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.62 ACRES

LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO JURUPA
DRIVE AND BEACH STREET (APN: 162-230-014)

B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CO NSIDER CALLING A SPE CIAL ELECTION; DECLARING THE RESULT S OF THE ELECTION; A ND APPROVING

FORMATION AND LEVY O F SPECIAL TAXES FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CO MMUNITY FACILITIES D ISTRICT NO. 2021-001
(GOLDENWEST) GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE WEST OF OPAL
STREET AND NORTH OF 45TH STREET, TRACT NO. 36827

Page - 8 -

1. That the City Council open the public hearing and take testimony, if any.

2. Following the public hearing, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-04, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2021 -001 (GOLDENWEST), TO ESTABLISH AN

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT THERE FORE, TO AUTHORIZE THE

LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN, AND TO SUBMIT THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE

LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
THEREOF; AND

3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-10, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, CALLING A SPECIAL

ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS

OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2021 -001 (GOLDENWEST) PROPOSITIONS

REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS

LIMIT AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN
THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT; AND

4. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-11, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORN IA, DECLARING THE RESULTS

OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -001
(GOLDENWEST) AND DIRECTING THE RECORDING OF A
NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN; AND

5. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-03, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS

THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -001
(GOLDENWEST) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX

THEREIN

Page - 9 -

C. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION; DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTION; AND APPROVING

FORMATION AND LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -005
(PUBLIC SAFETY, GOLDENWEST) GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
WEST OF OPAL STREET AND NORTH OF 45TH STREET, TRACT 36827

1. Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing and take testimony, if any.

2. Following the public hearing, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-05, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITEIS
DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -005 (PUBLIC SAFETY, GOLDENWEST),

TO ESTABLISH AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT THEREFORE, TO

AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN, AND TO

SUBMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS

LIMIT AND THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE
QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF; AND

3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-06, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, CALLING A SPECIAL

ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS

OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -005 (PUBLIC SAFETY, GOLDENWEST)

PROPOSITIONS REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF A

SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT; AND

4. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-07, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS

OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -005 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, GOLDENWEST) AND DIRECTING THE RECORDING
OF A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN; AND

5. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-01, entitled:

Page - 10 -

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS

THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTICT NO. PS 2022 -005 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, GOLDENWEST) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A

SPECIAL TAX THEREIN

D. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 21060: CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22009 FROM PUD NO. 02 TO PUD -03, AND MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39647 – EMERALD RIDGE NORTH FOR 184 SINGLE -DETACHED HOMES ON
44 ACRES AND ADOPT AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED EIR FOR

THE EMERALD RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT PURSUANT TO
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15164 (APNS: 179-060-002, 178-070-004, -006, - 007, 178-120-001, AND -002); (APPLICANT: HIGHPOINTE EMERALD RIDGE LLC)

1. That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and adopt Resolution No. 2023-08, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM

TO THE CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE EMERALD RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT (SCH NO.
2016041020)

2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-09, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , APPROVING MINOR
CHANGE NO. 2 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36947 TO
EXTEND LA CAÑADA DRIVE INTO TRACT AS THE NEW

SECONDARY POINT OF ACCESS

3. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-02, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF
ZONE NO. 22009 FROM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
NO. 2 TO PUD -03, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF
SR-60, WEST OF CANAL STREET, SOUTH OF 28TH S TREET,
AND EAST OF THE RIO VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN (APNS: 179 -060- 002, 178-070-004, -006, -007, 178-120-001, AND -002)

Page - 11 -

17. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

1. Requested Action: That the City Council ratify Mayor Chris Barajas’ appointment to the Planning Commission, which shall expire in December 2026.

2. That the City Council ratify Council Member Brian Berkson’s appointment to the Planning Commission, which shall expire in December 2026.

1. That the City Council ratify Council Member Armando Carmona’s appointment to the Planning Commission, which shall expire in December 2026.

B. MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 22051: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 FOR 118 CONDOMINIUMS ON
APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH STREET (APN: 162-230- 012); (APPLICANT: CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC) Requested Action: That the City Council adopt one of the following proposed resolutions to approve or deny Master Application No. 22051:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM)
NO. 38257 AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PERMIT
THE CONSTRUCTION OF 118 CONDOMINIUMS ON APPROXIMATELY

7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIMONITE

AVENUE AND BEACH STREET AND APPROVING A PREVIOUS

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FINDING THAT NO FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APN: 162-230-012)
OR

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, DENYING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 22051, A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38257 AND A NEIGHBORHOOD
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PERMIT A SCHEDULE “A” SUBDIVISION
OF APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT

THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LI MONITE AVENUE AND BEACH
STREET (APN:162-230-012)

Page - 12 -

C. APPOINTMENT OF CITY DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR THE
2023 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
(SCAG) ANNUAL REGIONAL CONFERENCE AND GENERAL

ASSEMBLY

Requested Action: That the City Council sele ct a Delegate and Alternate for the SCAG General Assembly meeting on Thursday, May 4 – Friday, May 5, 2023 at the JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort in Palm Desert, California.

18. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

19. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

20. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

21. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of February 2, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be m ade available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writin g on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.A
-1-

MINUTES

OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
December 15, 2022

1. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Leslie Altamirano, Mayor Pro Tem
● Lorena Barajas Bisbee, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
Mayor Chris Barajas called the regular meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee was absent.

2. INSTALLATION OF NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS
A. CERTIFICATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 8, 2022
Staff Report presented by Victoria Wasko, City Clerk.

A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, to adopt Resolution No. 2022-114, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACTS O F THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 8, 2022 DECLARING THE

RESULTS THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY
LAW
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
B. OATHS OF OFFICE AND PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF

ELECTION TO NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS
Mayor Chris Barajas congratulated Armando Carmona and Brian Scott Berkson on their election and re-election to the City Council.

The honorable Jorge C. Hernandez administered the oath of office t o Council Member Armando Carmona.

After taking the oath of office, Armando Carmona took his seat at the dais.

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-

David Barnes administered the oath of office to Mayor Chris Barajas.

Victoria Wasko admin istered the oath office to Council Member Brian Scott Berkson.

3. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION
A. ELECTION OF MAYOR
The City Clerk explained the nomination procedure.

There were no public comments.

Council Member Brian Berkson explained his “No” vote on the selection of mayor.

Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano nominated Chris Ba rajas to serve as Mayor. There bein g no further nominations, the nominations were closed.

Chris Barajas received a majority vote and was elected to serve as Mayor for a term expiring December 31, 2023.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, G. Silva
Noes: B. Berkson
Abstained: A. Carmona

B. ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM
Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano nominated Council Member Guillermo Silva to serve as Mayor Pro Tem. There bein g no further nominations, the nominations were closed. Council Member Guillermo Silva received a majority vote and was elected to serve as Mayor Pro Tem for a term expiring December 31, 2023.

Council Member Armando Carmona explained his absten tion votes on the mayor and mayor pro tem selections.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, G. Silva
Noes: B. Berkson
Abstained: A. Carmona

Mayor Chris Barajas called a short recess to allow members of the audience to enjoy some light refreshments in the lobby.

Mayor Chris Barajas reconvened the meeting at 8:05 p.m.

4. INVOCATION was given by Kyle Fagon, Beacon Hill Church.

-3-

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Council Member Armando Carmona.

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Agenda.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

7. PRESENTATIONS

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
The City Clerk announced that she received several emails acknowledging and congratulating Armando Carmona on his election to the City Council and those letters will be made part of the public record.

Patty Vega congratulated Armando Carmona on his election to the City Council , stating that Mr. Carmona’s election has restored resident’s faith that their community will be safe, clean and prosperous.

Lola Montes congratulated Armando Carmona on his election to the City Council, stating that he is the rightful person to lead Council District No. 1. She pledged to volunteer to maintain and grow the community.

Anthony Noriega, representing the League of United Latin American Citizens , congratulated Armando Carmona on his election to the City Council. He urged him to accomplish those matters that will benefit the community, including getting rid of the warehouses in Jurupa Valley.

Julia (no last name given) congratulated Armando Carmona on his election to the City Council.

Irene Rodriguez congratulated Armando Car mona on his election to the City Council, stating that despite certain barriers, Mr. Carmona did n ot let those get in his way. She stated that she is proud to have him represent her.

Luis Diaz congratulated Armando Carmona on his election to the City Council.

Reynaldo Gutierrez congratulated Armando Carmona on his election to the City Council.

Alfonso Gonzales congratulated Armando Car mona on his election to the City Council, stating that it is an important day in Jurupa Valley. He encouraged the City Council to work together for the benefit of the community.

-4-

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Armando Carmona read a statement stating that he was honored to represent Council District No. 1 , a community he has called home his entire life . He outlined his goals for the City, stating that he believes that all people should be treated fairly. He looks forward to working with his colleagues on the City Council to protect and properly invest in the equestrian community. He thanked his wife , his family, and the community for their support.

Mayor Chris Barajas announced that a local non -profit, “Where Your At Ministries” has partnered with the Lions Club and other non-profits to hold a free toy giveaway at Avalon Park in the community of Rubidoux this Saturday, December 17th. The toy giveaway will be a drive-through event and he will be there to help out.

Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano announced a toy giveaway will also be held at Mt .

Calvary Mission Baptist Church on Sunday, December 18th . She thanked Linda Thompson, Kim Jarrell Johnson and Brad Hancock for their community support in hosting the annual Jurupa Valley Children’s Christmas Party at Ina Arbuckle Elementary School.

Council Member Brian Berkson thanked his supporters for re -electing him to represent Council District No. 3. He promised t o work collaboratively with the Council for the betterment of the community.

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments – Executive Committee meeting of December 5, 2022.

2. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments – Strategic Plan Update meeting of December 9, 2022.

3. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments - Administration and Finance Committee meeting of December 14, 2022.

4. Mayor Chris Barajas announced that the Western Community Energy Joint meeting of the Board of Directors and Technical Advisory Committee meeting of December 14, 2022 was canceled.

5. Mayor Chris Barajas announced the formation on the Inland Regional Energy Network. T he Western Riverside Council of Governments

-5-

(WRCOG) has partnered with the San Bernardino Council of Governments (SBCOG) on development of a Regional Energy Network “REN” to service the Inland Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, with WRCOG acting as the lead agency. The REN will be used to administer grants for more energy efficient programs.

6. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments TUMF Northwest Zone Executive Committee meeting of December 14, 2022.

B. MAYOR PRO TEM LESLIE ALTAMIRANO

1. Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano gave an update on the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board of Directors meeting of December 5, 2022.

C. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. Council Member Brian Berkson announced that the N orthwest Transportation Now Coalition meeting of December 8, 202 2 was canceled.

2. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority meeting of December 9, 2022.

3. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission meeting of December 14, 2022.

4. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee meeting of December 15, 2022.

5. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside Transit Agency meeting of December 15, 2022.

D. COUNCIL MEMBER GUILLERMO SILVA

1. Council Member Guillermo Silva gave an update on the Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District meeting of December 15, 2022.

-6-

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

City Manager Rod Butler reported that at the last Planning Commission meeting, Laura Shultz was selected as Chair and Penny Newman was selected as Chair Pro Tem. The vacant positions on the Planning Commission will be advertised on December 20, 2022 with appointments being made at the January 19, 2023 Council meeting. He announced that City Hall will be closed on Friday, December 23, 2022, Monday, December 26, 2022 and Monday, January 2, 2023 in observance of the Christmas and New Year holidays. He reported that the Council will be asked to attend a special Closed Session on Friday, January 13, 2023.

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. DECEMBER 1, 2022 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Minutes of the December 1, 2022 meeting.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, G. Silva
Noes: B. Berkson
Abstained: A. Carmona

13. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN

THE AGENDA

Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.

B. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-24
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second re ading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-24, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNA,

AMENDING THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING

AUTOMOBILE FUELING STATION USES, AND FINDING AN
EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE

CEQA GUIDELINES

-7-

C. REAFFIRM FINDINGS AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO MEET IN

WHOLE OR IN PART BY TELECONFERENCING UNDER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DURING THE COVID -19

STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCY

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -115, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE

CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH A TELECONFERENCE OPTION

FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC DUE TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY AND THE CITY
COUNCIL’S DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e), AND MAKING FINDINGS

AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME

D. REAFFIRM THE CITY COUNCIL’S PRIOR ACTIONS AND DESIGNATE

JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT A S THE PUBLIC

AGENCY THAT SHALL RE CEIVE DEDICATIONS AN D FEES FOR

PARKS AND RECREATION AL PURPOSES PURSUANT TO JURUPA
VALLEY MUNICIPAL COD E SECTION 7.25.020 A ND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66477

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-116, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING JURUPA AREA RECREATION

AND PARK DISTRICT AS THE PUBLIC AGENCY , WHICH MAY

RECEIVE DEDICATIONS AND FEES FOR PARK A ND

RECREATIONAL PURPOSES PURSUANT TO JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 7.25.020 AND GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 66477

E. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -001 (GOLDENWEST)

AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 - 001 (GOLDENWEST) GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH OF 45TH STREET BETWEEN GOLDENWEST AVENUE AND OPAL, TR36827
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-118, entitled:

-8-

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 -001 (GOLDENWEST)

AND TO A UTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021 - 001 (GOLDENWEST)

F. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES D ISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -005 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, GOLDENWEST) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A

SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -005 (PUBLIC SAFETY,
GOLDENWEST); GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH OF 45 TH
STREET BETWEEN GOLDENWEST AVENUE AND OPAL, TR36827
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-119, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N O. PS 2022 -005 (PU BLIC

SAFETY, GOLDENWEST) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A

SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2022 -005 (PUBLIC SAFETY,

GOLDENWEST)

G. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO GENTRY GENERAL
ENGINEERING INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT, CIP #19112 AND FIND THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND NATIONAL

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT

1. Requested Action: That the City Council find and determine that the Citywide Guardrail Replacement, CIP #19112 is an alteration to existing City streets that does not involve the expansion of street capacity and is therefore exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines and the National Environmental Policy Act, 23 Code of Federal Regulations Section 771.116(c)(9);

2. Approve and award a construction agreement to Gentry General Engineering Inc. in the amount of $662,094 for the Citywide Guardrail Replacement, CIP #19112, for the work included in its bid proposal and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the form attached to the staff report;

-9-

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related minor amendments to the Agreement with Gentry General Engineering Inc. up to 10% as contingency to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions;

4. Allocate $74,135.40 of unencumbered Gas Tax funds to the Project account to fund the total Project costs; and

5. Authorize the City Manager to record the Notice of Completion upon acceptance of work by the City Engineer.

H. APPROVAL OF MASTER AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE FOUR HUMAN

RESOURCES SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION
OF TRAINING SERVICES THROUGH GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, INC.

DOING BUSINESS AS NEOGOV

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the purchase of four subscriptions with NEOGOV, not to exceed the amount of $134,165.25 for time and attendance, e-forms, benefits and core human resources database including software set up and training costs for staff, which will be paid over three years including a two-year discounted rate as outlined in the staff report; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents pursuant to the proposed purchase, including the ability to make minor non - substantive changes.

A motion was ma de by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Consent Calendar. (Council Member Armando Carmona abstained from voting on Item

13.B)

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AIRPORT ZONE AT FLABOB AIRPORT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 22007,
ZONING CODE AMENDMEN T (ZCA) NO.22013, CH ANGE OF ZONE
(CZ) 22008; LOCATION: 4130 MENNES AVE, JURUPA VALLEY APNS:
181-151-001, -002,-003 AND -005; 181-152-001, -002, -004, AND -005; 181- 160-004; 181-170-005,-006, -009 THROUGH -022, AND -026; 181,180-001,

-10-

181-190-001, -004, -007, -008, -009, -010, -015, -021, AND -022; 181-370-002, -005, -006, -007, AND A PORTION OF -008; 181-400-001, -002, 003, -004 ,- 008, AND -009)

Staff Report presented by Jim Pechous, Principal Planner.

Further discussion followed.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing and called for any public comments.

An unidentified speaker questioned why there is no environmental impact on such a large development.

Mayor Chris Barajas addressed the question regarding environmental impacts, stating that the reason there are no environmental impacts is because the project is not a new development – the airport already exists. He stated that Flabob Airport is in District 5 and he has been working over a year to bring this to fruition in order to protect the historical nature of the airport.

Council Member Carmona discussed the proposed rezoning and suggested bringing more awareness to Flabob Airport.

Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano voiced support of the Council action as it w ill protect the area around the airport from new industrial uses.

Council Member Berkson questioned the warehouse uses at the airport voicing concern that a new warehouse could be potentially added to the airport.

Council Member Carmona asked if a different term could be used in place of warehouse to distinguish storage or an airport hangar.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

Following discussion, the Council amended Section 9.232.020(B)(15), which will now read “Storage on ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less, no outdoor storage.”
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva , to introduce Ordinance No. 2022 -22, as amended and entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO

ESTABLISH A NEW AIRPORT ZONE CLASSIFICATION, ESTABLISH

PERMITTED LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS FOR

THE AIRPORT ZONE, AND MAKE OTHER CONFORMING CHANGES
TO TITLE 9 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE, AND

-11-

FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES;
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva , to introduce Ordinance No. 2022 -23 entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT T O THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONES OF
APPROXIMATELY 138.86 COMBINED ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 4130 MENNES AVENUE FROM MANUFACTURING

HEAVY (M -H), MANUFACTURING -SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M -SC), GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R -3), AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL (R -4)

ZONES TO AIRPORT (AIR) ZONE, AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION
FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA
GUIDELINES; AND
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution No. 2022-112, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING A DETERMINATION OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA G UIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3), AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 22007 TO AMEND
THE 2017 GENERAL PLAN TO STATE THAT THE AIRPORT (AIR)

ZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC
FACILITY\INSTITUTIONAL (PF) LAND USE DESIGNATION AND

AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP TO REDESIGNATE

THE ENTIRETY OF THE FLABOB AIRPORT SITE TO PUBLIC

FACILITY/INSTITUTIONAL (PF)
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

-12-

B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER EXTENSION OF AN INTERIM

URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65858 ESTABLISHING EMERGENCY REGULATIONS

RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9, DECLARING THE URGENCY

THEREOF AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION

UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
GUIDELINES SECTIONS 65852.21(J) AND 15061(B) (3)
Staff Report presented by Tamara Campbell, Principal Planner. Ms. Campbell provided a background of Senate Bill 9, which was passed in 2021 . She reported that SB 9 is a state mandate that allows the subdivision of all single -family properties. She outlined the City’s prior Interim Urgency Ordinance which allowed the City to identify and address potential impacts of SB 9. Since that time, the City extended the Interim Urgency Ordinance on February 22, 2022 for an additional ten months and 15 days to address potential impacts of SB 9. Tonight, the Council is being asked to consider an additional one-year extension with an expiration date of January 20, 2024. She provided an overview of Senate Bill 9 and the City’s efforts to help protect the community from potential adverse impacts from the added housing density.

Further discussion followed.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing and called for any public comments.

Roberto Ramirez asked how SB 9 affects the equestrian community or those properties that are zoned for horses.

Further discussion followed.

Mayor Chris Barajas clarified that the new housing bill known as SB 9 will only affect R-1 zoned single-family lots.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

Further discussion followed.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to adopt Ordinance No. 2022-25 extending Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2022-02 entitled:

AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2022 -02, ESTABLISHING EMERGENCY
REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858

-13-

ON URBAN LOT SPLITS AND HOUSING UNITS BUILT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9, AND MAKING A

DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

C. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 22118: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38258 FOR 35 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.62 ACRES

LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO JURUPA
DRIVE AND BEACH STREET (APN: 162 -230-014); (APPLICANT:

CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC)

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing and called for any public comments.

There being no further comments, the publi c hearing was continued to the January 19, 2023 City Council Meeting.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

16. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. ANNUAL RECONFIRMATION PROCESS FOR MEMBERS OF THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE

City Clerk Victoria Wasko reported that in accordance with Ordinance No. 2019- 04, the terms of the members of the City’s Community Development Advisory Committee shall be subject to reconfirmation by the City Council in December of each year.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to reconfirm the appointment s of Rachel Lopez, Andrew Mac Millan, and Donald Oaks, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2019-04.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

-14-

B. ANNUAL RECONFIRMATION PROCESS FOR MEMBERS OF THE

PLANNING COMMISSION

City Clerk Victoria Wasko reported that in accordance with Ordinance No. 2013- 11, the terms of the members of the City’s Planning Commission shall be subject to reconfirmation by the City Council in December of each year.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva , to reconfirm the appointment of Planning Commissioners Hakan Jackson and Laura Schultz pursuant to Section

2.35.030(E) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, G. Silva
Noes: None
Abstained: A. Carmona

C. ANNUAL RECONFIRMATION PROCESS FOR MEMBERS OF THE

PUBLIC WORKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
City Clerk Victoria Wasko reported that in accordance with Ordinance No. 2022- 13, the terms of the members of the City’s Public Works Advisory Committee shall be subject to reconfirmation by the City Council in December of each year.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva , to reconfirm the appointment s of Hugo Bustamante, Jose Cuellar, Robert Galindo, Mayra Jackson, and Alondra Munoz, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2022-13.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
D. APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES TO

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
City Clerk Victoria W asko reported that the Council is being asked to consider appointments to various regional Boards and/or Committees for the 2023 calendar year.

Further discussion followed.

By consensus, the City Council approved travel and/or reimbursement of expenses to attend upcoming conferences and made the following appointments for the 2023 Calendar Year:

-15-

1. Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District (2 -year term) – Council Member Guillermo Silva, representative. (No alternate required)

2. Public Entity Risk Management Authority (PERMA) – City Manager Rod Butler, representative, Connie Cardenas, Administrative Services Director, Alternate

3. Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) – Council Member Brian Berkson, representative, Council Member Armando Carmona, Alternate

4. Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) – Council Member Brian Berkson, representative, Council Member Armando Carmona, Alternate

5. Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) – Mayor Chris Barajas, representative, Council Member Brian Berkson, Alternate

6. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, representative, Council Member Guillermo Silva, Alternate

7. City Celebration Committee – Mayor Chris Barajas and Mayor Pro Tem-Elect Guillermo Silva

3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION FORM 806 REFLECTING THE

APPOINTMENTS MADE TO THE REGIONAL BOARDS AND

COMMISSIONS
City Clerk Victoria Wasko presented the staff report.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Mayor Chris Barajas, to adopt Resolution No. 2022-117, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, APPROVING A REVISED FAIR POLITIC AL PRACTICES
COMMISSION FORM 806 REGARDING THE APPOIN TMENT OF

COUNCIL MEMBERS TO COMPENSATED POSITIONS
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

17. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
Assistant City Attorney Maricela Marroquin had no report.

18. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Council Member Guillermo Silva requested that a get acquainted meeting be scheduled with all of the City’s board and committee members.

-16-

Council Member Armando Carmona requested that a community workshop be scheduled with residents that are impacted by flooding. He asked that resources for flooding, sandbags, etc. be made available to residents. He acknowledged Este ban Escobedo from the California Department of Food & A griculture, Dr. Rodrigo Gallardo from UC Davis Veterinary Medicine and Luis Diaz from hi storic Mira Loma for hosting an information session on disease prevention and the avian flu and how to prevent the disease in poultry and other birds in the community. He recognized “Charreria Against Cancer” in Jurupa Valley for raising over $300,000 over the last few years for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. He congratulated Nadia “La Panterita” Diaz for representing Jurupa Valley in the USA Boxing National Championship.

19. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 10:08 p.m.

The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held January 19, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.B

CHECK REGISTERS

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated November 22, 30 and December 7, 14, 21, and 28 , 2022 as well as the payroll register s dated November 25, 30 and December 09, 23, and 31, 2022.

The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the annual budget process. The FY 2022-23 Budget was adopted on June 16, 2022. Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution throughout the fiscal year.

ANALYSIS
All expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the Government Code. The check register dated December 21, 2022 includes a $13,510.10 and $18,541.41 payment to Chase Card Services. The Statement, with purchase details, is attached herewith.

OTHER INFORMATION
None.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Check registers:
11/22/22 $ 468,954.02
11/30/22 $ 153,393.86
12/07/22 $ 637,881.31

RETURN TO AGENDA

AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.C
12774-0001\2738624v3.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-22

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE JURUPA VALLEY

MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A NEW AIRP ORT

ZONE CLASSIFICATION, ESTABLISH PERMITTED

LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE

AIRPORT ZONE, AND MA KE OTHER CONFORMING
CHANGES TO TITLE 9 O F THE JURUPA VALLEY

MUNICIPAL CODE , AND FINDING AN EXE MPTION
FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA

GUIDELINES

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project and Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) At the January 21, 2021 regular City Council meeting, the City Council initiated General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013 (the “Zoning Code Amendment”), and Change of Zone No. 22008, to (a) establish a new Airport Zone classification, (b) establish permitted land uses and development standards for the Airport Zone and make other conforming changes to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, (c) reclassify the entirety of the Flabob Airport site as Airport Zone, (d) amend the 2017 General Plan to state that the Airport Zone is consistent with the Public Facility\Institutional (PF) land use designation, and (e) amend the General Plan land use map to redesignate the entirety of the Flabob Airport site to Public Facility/Institutional (PF) (the “Project”), and requested that the Planning Commission study and report on the proposed Zoning Code Amendment, as set forth in this Ordinance. The Zoning Code Amendment is the subject of this Ordinance. (b) The Zoning Code Amendment was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (c) On November 9 , 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the proposed Zoning Code Amendment set forth in this Ordinance, at which time all persons interested in the proposed Zoning Code Amendment had the opportunity and did address the Planning Com mission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. Following a discussion of the Project the Planning Commission voted 3 -0-2 (Hakan abs tained; 1 vacancy) to recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022 -11-09-03, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley Recommending that the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Approve General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, Redesignating the Land Use Designations Parcels within the Flabob Airport to P ublic Facility/Institutional, Establishing an Airport Zone Classification and Permitted Uses and Applicable Development Standards, Amending the General

RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
12774-0001\2738624v3.doc
Plan to Make the Airport Zone Consistent with the Public Facility/Institutional Land Use Designation, and Reclassifying the Zoning of Parcels within the Flabob Airport as Airport Zone, and Make a Determination of Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). (d) On December 1, 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council continued the public hearing.
(e) On December 15, 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
(f) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Zoning Code Amendment, establishing a new Airport Zone classification, establishing permitted land uses and development standards for the Airport Zone, and make other conforming changes to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code , will have a significant effect on the environment.

The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is an administrative process of the City that will not result in direct or indirect phys ical changes in the environment . The City Council has reviewed the administrative record concerning the proposed Zoning Code Amendment and the proposed CEQA determinations, and based on its own independent judgment, finds that the Zoning Code Amendment set forth in this Ordinance is not subject to, or exempt from, the requirements of the CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Section 3. Project Findings. The City Council hereby finds, as required by the Jurupa Valley Ordinances and applicable state law, that the proposed Zoning Code Amendment should be adopted because the proposed Zoning Code Amendment is consistent with the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan , as amended by General Plan Amendment N o. 22007, in that the proposed Airport Zone is consistent with airport operations at Flabob Airport, supports the continued operation of Flabob Airport as an airport, requires consistency with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, and prohibits bird attracting uses and heavy industrial that can impact the ongoing operation of Flabob Airport.

Section 4. Amendment to Section 9.35.010 . Section 9.35.010, Zones, of Chapter

9.35, Zone Classifications, of Title 9, Planning and Zoning, of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following zone classification: “AIR - Airport”. -3-
12774-0001\2738624v3.doc
Section 5. Amendment to Title 9. A new Chapter 9.232 is hereby added to Title 9, Planning and Zoning, of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 9.232. – AIR ZONE (AIRPORT)
Sec. 9.232.010. - Intent.

It is the intent of this chapter is to promote and attract aviation-related businesses and industry, allow improvements to the Flabob Airport, and maintain the Flabob Airport as a historical, cultural and recreational hub of the city, while also conforming to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and protecting public safety.

Sec. 9.232.020. - Uses permitted.

A. The following uses are permitted in the AIR Zone:
(1) Airport operation and related uses: Air terminal buildings, air traffic control and navigational facilities, administrative buildings and offices, indoor storage, baggage and cargo services, hangars, airport and aircraft maintenance and operational facilities, runways and landing areas, taxiways and taxi lanes, tie - downs for aircraft.
(2) Public safety and services facilities (police, fire, EMT, etc.) . (3) Government public safety agencies .
(4) Meteorological installations .
(5) Natural area, non -bird attracting agricultural uses, open space, and buffer areas .

B. The following uses are permitted upon approval of a site development permit pursuant to Section 9.240.330:
(1) Aircraft fueling.
(2) Aviation manufacturing.
(3) Aviation light industrial.
(4) Airport equipment repair, paint, and support services. (5) Automotive services related to airport operations. (6) Aviation experimental facilities and laboratories.
(7) Aviation related information services.
(8) Aviation museums and displays.
-4-
12774-0001\2738624v3.doc
(9) Ground transportation.
(10) Rental cars.
(11) Helicopter operations.
(12) Clubs and organizations.
(13) Restaurants, cafes, and snake bars.
(14) Retail stores.
(15) Storage ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less, no outdoor storage.

C. The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted pursuant to Section 9.240.280:
(1) Hotels, motels.
(2) Student housing.
(3) Recreational facilities that are non-bird attracting. (4) Technical schools and other educational uses.
(5) Farmers markets consistent with Section 9.240.520.

D. Uses not listed. Any use that is not specifically listed in subsections A., B., and C. may be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that the Community Development Director finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as thos e listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process which governs the category in which it falls.

Sec. 9.232.030. - Development standards.

The following development standards shall apply in the AIR Zone:
(1) Lot area. The minimum lot size shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet, unless a sewer connection is available, in which case the minimum lot size shall be seven thousand (7,000) square feet.
(2) Lot width. The minimum lot width shall be seventy-five (75) feet , unless a sewer connection is available, in which case the minimum lot width shall be sixty-five (65) feet.
(3) Yards. A minimum twenty-five (25) foot setback shall be required on any boundary that abuts a residential property and that is street-facing. No minimum setback shall be required on boundaries that do not abut residential property. Portions of a setback that require landscaping shall only be used for driveways parking and landscaping. -5-
12774-0001\2738624v3.doc
(4) Structure height. The maximum height for all structures, including buildings, shall be thirty-five (35) feet at the yard setback line. All buildings and structures shall not exceed fifty (50) feet in height, unless a height up to seventy -five (75) feet for buildings, or one hundred and five (105) feet for other structures is specifically permitted under the provisions of Section 9.240.370.
(5) Parking areas. Parking areas shall be provided as required per Section 9.240.120. (6) Masonry wall. A minimum six (6) foot high solid wall or combination landscaped earthen berm and masonry wall shall be constructed on each property line that adjoins any parcel zoned for residential use.
(7) Landscaping.
(a) A minimum ten (10) percent of the site proposed for development shall be landscaped and irrigated.
(b) A minimum ten (10) foot wide landscape strip adjacent to street right-of-way lines shall be landscaped and maintained.
(c) A minimum twenty (20) foot wide landscape strip adjacent to lots zoned residential shall be landscaped and maintained.
(8) Trash areas. Trash areas shall be screened with landscaping or structures. (9) Outside storage . Outside storage, as described in Section 9.10.050, shall be completely screened from public view by abutting residential properties. (10) Utilities. Utilities shall be installed underground. (11) Mechanical equipment. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. (12) Lighting. All lighting fixtures shall be focused, directed, and arranged to prevent glare or direct illumination on streets or adjoining property.” Section 6. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 7. Effect of Ordinance . This Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside adopted by reference by the City of Jurupa Valley in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance.

Section 8. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.
-6-
12774-0001\2738624v3.doc
Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.

PASSED, APPROVED , AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of January, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-7-
12774-0001\2738624v3.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-22 was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of December, 2022, and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of January, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of January, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.D
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-23

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN AMENDME NT TO THE CITY OF JU RUPA VALLEY

OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONE S OF
APPROXIMATELY 138.86 COMBINED ACRES OF REAL PROPER TY
LOCATED AT 4130 MENNES AVENU E FROM MANUFACTURING

HEAVY (M -H), MANUFAC TURING-SERVICE COMME RCIAL (M -SC), GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3), AND PLANNED R ESIDENTIAL (R -4)

ZONES TO AIRPORT (AIR) ZONE , AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION
FROM CEQA UNDER SECT ION 15061(B)(3) OF T HE CEQA

GUIDELINES

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. At the January 21, 2021 regular City Council meeting, the City Council initiated General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, to (a) establish a new Airport Zone classification, (b) establish permitted land uses and development standards for the Airport Zone and make other conforming changes to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, (c) reclassify the entirety of the Flabob Airport site as Airport Zone, (d) amend the 2017 General Plan to state that the Airport Zone is consistent with the Public Facility \Institutional (PF) land use designation, and (e) amend the General Plan land use map to redesignate the entirety of the Flabob Air port site to Public Facility/Institutional (PF) (the “Project”). Change of Zone No. 22008 is the subject of this Ordinance.

Section 2. Change of Zone.
(a) The City has initiated Change of Zone No. 22008 to rezone approximately 138.86 combined acres of real property (APNs:181-151-001, -002,-003 and -005; 181-152-001, - 002, -004, and -005; 181-160-004; 181-170-005,-006, -009 through -022, and -026; 181,180-001, 181-190-001, -004, -007, -008, -009, -010, -015, -021, and -022; 181-370-002, -005, -006, -007, and a portion of -008; 181-400-001, -002, -003, -004 ,-008, and 009) as follows and as shown in Exhibit “A”:
1) 50.38 acres of real property located at 4130 Mennes Avenue (APNs:
181-190-001, a portion of 181-190-010) from Manufacturing Heavy (M-H) Zone to Airport (AIR) Zone;
2) 71.48 acres of real property located at 4130 Mennes Avenue (APNs:
181-190-004, -007, -008, a portion of 181-190-010, -015, -021, -022; 181-180-001; 181-170-005, -006, -010 through -022, a portion of -026; 181-160-004; 181-152-001, -002, -004, -005; 181-140- 001, -003, -004, -005, -008; 181-370-002, -005, -006, -007, and a portion of -008; 181-400-001, - 002, -003, -004, -008, and -009) from Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC) Zone to Airport (AIR) Zone;

RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-

3) 2.89 acres of real property located at 4130 Mennes Avenue (APNs:
181-190-009; 181-151-001, -002, -003, -005) from General Residential (R -3) Zone to Airport (AIR) Zone;
4) 12.69 acres of real property located at 4130 Mennes Avenue (APNs:
181-370-006, and -007; a portion of 181-370-002, 005 and -008, , a portion of 181-140-001, -002, -003 and -004; a portion of 181 -190-014; a portion of 181 -137-005, -006, -007, and -008) from Planned Residential (R-4) Zone to Airport (AIR) Zone; and 5) 1.42 acres of real property located at 4130 Mennes Avenue (APNs:
a portion of 181-170-026) from Light Agriculture (A-1) Zone to Airport (AIR) Zone. (b) Section 9.285.010. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that amendments to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code must be made in accordance with the procedures se t forth in Government Code Section 65800 et seq. , as now enacted or hereafter amended, and with the requirements of Title 9. Government Code Section 65853 provides that an amendment to a zoning ordinance, which amendment changes any property from one zone to another, shall be adopted in the manner set forth in Sections 65854 to 65857, inclusive. (c) Government Code Section 65854 provides that the planning commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance, with notice of the hearing given pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and, if the proposed amendment to a zoning ordinance affects the permitted uses of real property, also given pursuant to Government Code Section 65091. Additionally, Sections 9.285.040.(1) and (2) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provide that the Planning Commission shall hold a noticed public hearing on a proposed amendment to Title 9 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code that proposes to change property from one zone to another.
(d) Government Code Sec tion 65855 provides that after the hearing, the planning commission must render its decision in the form of a written recommendation to the legislative body, which must include the reasons for the recommendation, the relationship of the proposed amendment to applicable general and specific plans, and must transmit the recommendation to the legislative body in such form and manner as may be specified by the legislative body. Additionally, Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that, after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission must render its decision within a reasonable time and transmit it to the City Council in the form of a written recommendation, which shall contain the reasons for the recommendation and the rela tionship of the proposed amendment to 2017 General Plan. A copy of the recommendation shall be mailed to the applicant and proof thereof shall be shown on the original transmitted to the City Council. (e) Government Code Section 65856(a) provides that upon re ceipt of the recommendation of the planning commission, the legislative body must hold a public hearing.

Additionally, Section 9.285.040.(4)(a) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day, and give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission.
-3-

(f) Government Code Section 65857 provides that the legislative body may approve, modify, or disapprove the recommendation of the planning commission; provided that any modification of the proposed ordinance or amendment by the legislative body not previ ously considered by the planning commission during its hearing, must first be referred to the planning commission for report and recommendation, but the planning commission shall not be required to hold a public hearing thereon. Additionally, Section 9.285.040.(5) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing the City Council must render its decision within a reasonable time and may approve, modify, or disapprove the recommendation of the Planning Commission; provided, however, that any proposed modification of the Planning Commission’s recommendation not previously considered by the Planning Commission must first be referred back to the Planning Commission for a report and recommendation.

Section 3. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine, and declare that:
(a) Change of Zone No. 22008 was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On November 9, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. Following a discussion of the Project the Planning Commission voted 3-0-2 (Hakan abstained; 1 vacancy) to recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022 -11-09-03, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley Recommending that the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Approve General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, Redesignating the Land Use Designations Parcels within the Flabob Airport to Pu blic Facility/Institutional, Establishing an Airport Zone Classification and Permitted Uses and Applicable Development Standards, Amending the General Plan to Make the Airport Zone Consistent with the Public Facility/Institutional Land Use Designation, and Reclassifying the Zoning of Parcels within the Flabob Airport as Airport Zone, and Make a Determination of Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). (c) On December 1, 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council continued the public hearing.
(d) On December 15, 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 22007, Zoning Code Amendment No. 22013, and Change of Zone No. 22008, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
-4-

(e) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The proposed Change of Zone is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Change of Zone, reclassifying the entirety of the Flabob Airport site as Airport Zone, will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Change of Zone is an administrative process of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. The City Council has reviewed the administrative record concerning the proposed Change of Zone and the proposed CEQA determination, and based on its own independent judgment, finds that the Change of Zone set forth in this Ordinance is not subject to, or exempt from, the requirements of the CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Section 1. Findings for Approval of Change of Zone . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby finds and determines that Change of Zone No. 22008 should be adopted because the proposed Change of Zone No. 22008 will be consistent with the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 22007, in that the General Plan Land Use Element Flabob and Riverside Airport Overlay requires consistency with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and ongoing safe operations of Flabob Airport. The proposed Airport Zone is consistent with the General Plan goals because the proposed Airport Zone provisions support airport operations at Flabob Airport, support the continued operation of Flabob Airport as an airport, require consistency with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, and prohibits bird-attracting uses and heavy industrial that can impact the ongoing operation of Flabob Airport.

Approval of Change of Zone. Based on the foregoing, t he City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby adopts Change of Zone No. 22008, and rezones approximately 140 combined acres of real property located at 4130 Mennes Avenue (APNs: 181-151-001, -002,-003 and -005; 181- 152-001, -002, -004, and -005; 181-160-004; 181-170-005,-006, -009 through -022, and -026; 181,180-001, 181-190-001, -004, -007, -008, -009, -010, -015, -021, and -022; 181-370-002, -005, -006, -007, and a portion of -008; 181 -400-001, -002, 003, -004 , -008, and -009) from Manufacturing Heavy (M-H), Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M -SC), General Residential (R-3), and Planned Residential (R-4) Zones to Airport (AIR) Zone as described in Section 2 of this Ordinance and depicted in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, and directs the City Manager to revise the official City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Map to designate the properties as being in the new Airport (AIR) Zone.

Section 5. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 6. Effect of Ordinance . This Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside incorporated by the City of Jurupa Valley that may in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance.
-5-

Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.

PASSED, APPROVED , AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of January, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-6-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-23 was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of December, 2022, and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of January, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of January, 2023.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

A-1

EXHIBIT A

Change of Zone No. 22008

EXHIBIT A
Change of Zone to Airport Zone (AIR)

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.E

REAFFIRM FINDINGS AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO MEET IN

WHOLE OR IN PART BY TELECONFERENCING UNDER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DURING THE COVID-19

STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCY

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-01, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE CITY

COUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH A TELECONFERENCE OPTION FOR

MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC DUE TO THE
GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF EMERGENC Y AND THE CITY
COUNCIL’S DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e), AND MAKING FINDINGS AND

DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME

BACKGROUND
At the beginning of the COVID -19 Pandemic, the Governor issued an Executive Order allowing the City Council and other City legislative bodies to conduct their meetings, in whole or in part, by telephone or other electronic means. This Executive Order expired but the Legislature adopted Chapter 165 of 2021 (AB 361) th at allows meetings of a legislative body such as the City Council or commissions to be conducted by telephone or other electronic means if certain findings are made concerning an emergency and certain procedures providing for public comment are followed.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 3

Attachment:

1. Proposed Resolution No. 2023-01
-1-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-01

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE

HELD WITH A T ELECONFERENCE OPTION FOR

MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC
DUE TO THE GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF
EMERGENCY AND THE CITY COUNCIL’S

DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e ), AND MAKING

FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE
SAME

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(A) City Council is committed to public access and participation in its meetings and the meetings of all City legislative bodies while balancing the need to conduct public meetings in a manner that r educes the likelihood of exposure to COVID -19 and to support physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
(B) All meetings of the City Council and other City legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City Council and other City legislative bodies conduct their business.
(C) Pursuant to Chapter 165 of the Statutes of 2021 ( Assembly Bill 361 ) legislative bodies of local agencies may hold public meetings via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e), without complying with the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(b)(3), if the legislative body complies with certain enumerated requirements in any of the following circumstances:
1) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing.
2) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. 3) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. -2-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
(d) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention c ontinue to advise that COVID-19 spreads more easily indoors than outdoors and that people are more likely to be exposed to COVID-19 when they are closer than six feet apart from others for longer periods of time;
(e) Due to the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic and th e need to promote social distancing to reduce the likelihood of exposure to COVID -19, the City Council intend s to hold public meetings with an option for members of those bodies and the public to attend by teleconference pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e) based on the following findings:
1) The declared emergency is still in effect. On March 4, 2020, the Governor declared a State of Emergency in California related to the COVID -19 pandemic (the “Emergency”) and this State of Emergency has not been re pealed. On March 20, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-10 declaring a Local Emergency related to the COVID -19 Pandemic, which Local Emergency has been reaffirmed since that time, including the adoption of Resolution No. 2022-07 on January 20, 2022.
2) California State Department of Public Health and Riverside County have each recommended measures to promote social distancing. Thus, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health still requires that employers provide for physical and social distancing in the workplace. Additionally, the Riverside County Department of Public Health still encourages people at risk for severe illness or death from COVID -19 to take protective measures such as social distancing and, for those not yet fully vaccinated, to physically distance from others whose vaccination status is unknown. The County Health Department also continues to recommend that employers take steps to support physical distancing. 3) The City Council reaffirms the findings made in Res olution No. 2022-08 adopted on January 20, 2022. Staff will also present these findings on a monthly basis in the manner provided by Government Code Section 54953(e) thereafter should the above - mentioned conditions continue.

Section 2. The City Council will continue to hold in person public meetings during the Emergency with required social distancing to the extent practicable. The City Council shall have the option to conduct their meetings in whole or in part via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e).

Section 3. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 4. The City Council will reconsider the above findings within thirty days of adoption of this Resolution.

-3-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of January, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-01 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of January, 2023, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of January, 2023.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.F

AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY

RECORDS

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-02, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN

OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS

BACKGROUND
The City’s records are an important asset of the City; however, over time various records lose their legal, fiscal, or administrative significance. The City Clerk’s office is recommending that the City Council approve the destruction of obsolete records that have reached the end of their retention and have no further legal, fiscal, or administrative value.

The proposed resolution complies with the City’s Records Management Policy which was adopted by Resolution No. 2018 -06. The intent of this policy is to apply efficient and economical management methods to the creation, utilization, m aintenance, retention, preservation, and disposal of City records.

ANALYSIS
Following the adoption of a City resolution and approval by the City Attorney, City staff may destroy inactive records when they have satisfied all legal retention requirements.

Destruction is carried out in accordance with the City’s Record Retention Schedules and pursuant to Government Code Section 34090.

RETURN TO AGENDA

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-02

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE

DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) At their February 15, 2018 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-06 approving the City of Jurupa Valley Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual; and
(b) The City of Jurupa Valley Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual contains the records retention and disposition schedules for all City departments. The records retentio n and disposition schedules are a comprehensive listing of records created or maintained by the City, the length of time each record should be retained, and the legal retention authority. If no legal retention authority is cited, the retention period is ba sed on state law and standard records management practice; and
(c) Government Code section 34090 provides that, with the approval of the City Council and the written consent of the City Attorney, the head of a City department may destroy certain city records, documents, instruments, books or papers under the Department Head’s charge, without making a copy, if the records are no longer needed; and (d) A list of the records, documents, instruments, books or papers proposed for destruction is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein, and shall hereafter be referred to collectively as the “Records”; and
(e) The Records do not include any records affecting title to real property or liens upon real property, court records, records required to be kept by statute, records less than two years old, video or audio recordings that are evidence in any claim or pending litigation, or the minutes, ordinances or resolutions of the City Council or any City board or commission; and (f) The City Clerk agrees that the proposed dest ruction conforms to the City’s retention and disposition schedules; and
(g) The City Attorney consents to the destruction of the Records; and (h) The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that the Records are no longer required and may be destroyed.
-2-

Section 2. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes the City Clerk or her designated representative to destroy the Records as shown as Exhibit A , without retaining a copy as described therein.

Section 3. The destruction of the Records pursuant to this Resolution is hereby approved.

_______________________________________
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
City of Jurupa Valley

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of January, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-3-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-02 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of January, 2023, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of January, 2023.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

Exhibit A
City of Jurupa Valley
City Clerk’s Office
List of Records Scheduled for Destruction in CY 2023
City of Jurupa Valley
City Clerk’s Office
List of Records Scheduled for Destruction in CY 2023

Recorded Series File Number 100-02 – Contracts and Agreements Retention: Closed, plus 5 years
Permanently Stored in Laserfiche Records Depository

GST Consulting Expired 7/01/2012
GST Consulting, 1st Amendment Expired 6/06/2013
GST Consulting Expired 6/19/2014
GST Consulting Expired 7/30/2015
HdL Coren & Cone Expired 8/21/2014
Kosmont & Associates, Inc. Expired 7/01/2011
Kosmont & Associates, Inc., 1st Amendment Expired 7/17/2014 Kosmont & Associates, Inc., 2nd Amendment Expired 7/16/2015 Kosmont & Associates, Inc., 3rd Amendment Expired 6/30/2017

Record Series File Number 120-02 – City Council Agendas (Scanned in City Clerk’s Permanent Records)
Retention Completed, plus 2 years. Scan for reference

City Council Agendas 2019 and 2020

Record Series File Number 120-05 – City Council Speaker Cards Retention: Completed, plus 2 years
Information is in the Minutes

City Council Speaker Cards 2020

Record Series File Number 150-01 – Certificates of Liability Insurance Retention: Current, plus 2 years or the duration of the project

Aneen Construction Inc. 2017

Bitetto Tow & Service Center Inc. 2015 to 2018

CIPA and City of Brea 2018 – 2020

Civic Solutions Inc. 2018 – 2020

Data Ticket Inc. 2018 – 2020

Dudek 2018

ECS Imaging Inc 2018 – 2020

Engineering Resources of So. Cal. Inc. 2018 – 2020

Epic Land Solutions, Inc. 2019 - 2020

Gentry Brothers Inc. 2016

GRC & Associates Inc. 2017 – 2019

HdL Coren & Cone 2018 – 2020

Hinderliter de Llamas & Associates 2019 – 2020

HR Green & Pacific Inc. 2018 – 2020

IMS Infrastructure & Investment LLC 2019

Iteris Inc. 2017

KOA Corporation 2018 – 2020

Kosmont & Associates, Inc. 2016 – 2020

KTU+A Planning & Landscape Architecture 2017 – 2019

LaBelle Marvin, Inc. 2018 – 2020

Liberty Towing Quality Roadside Service Inc. 2016 – 2017

LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2018 – 2020

LSA Associates, Inc. 2018 – 2019

MCE Corporation 2017 – 2020

Onward Engineering 2019 – 2020

Orange County Striping Services, Inc. 2018 – 2020

Overland Pacific & Cutler, Inc. 2014, 2016

Pictometry International Corp. 2020

Placeworks, Inc. 2017 – 2020

Psomas 2015 – 2020

PV Maintenance, Inc. 2014 – 2017

Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC 2020

S & H Civilworks 2017

Santa Fe Building Maintenance 2017 – 2020

Schmidt Geomatic Mapping, Inc. 2015

Softscapes Corporation 2017 – 2020

Superior Pavement Markings, Inc. 2016 – 2019

SWAGIT Productions, LLC 2020

T & B Planning, Inc. 2018 – 2020

Torrent Resources CA, Inc. 2017

United Pumping Service, Inc. 2017 – 2020

Urban Futures, Inc. 2018 – 2020

Van Dyke Landscape Architects 2017 – 2019

Richards, Watson & Gershon 2017 – 2020

West Coast Arborists, Inc. 2016 – 2019

Record Series File Number 200-02 – Check/Payroll Register Agenda Reports Retention: Originals kept for 2 years
Permanently stored in Laserfiche Records Depository

Check/Payroll Registers 2017 – 2020

Record Series File Number 340-04 – Claims for Damages
Retention: 7 years after claim is closed or settled

Jennifer Craigmyle DOL: 5/07/2015 Closed: 12/29/2015

Joanne Donegan DOL: 10/3/2014 Closed: 11/9/2015

County of Riverside DOL: 6/30/2015 Closed: 10/19/2015

Jose Luis Hernandez DOL: 1/3/2015 Closed: 8/26/2015

Justin Martinez DOL: 2013-2013 Closed: 7/28/2015

Mark Holmes DOL: 11/16/2014 Closed: 7/20/2015

Maricruz Barajas, et al. DOL: 4/03/2014 Closed: 7/8/2015

Justin Strickland DOL: 6/07/2014 Closed: 6/9/2015

Darrel Livingston DOL: 9/30/2014 Closed: 6/3/2015

Ernest and Josie Almaguer DOL: 8/21/2014 Closed: 6/3/2015

Andrea Kelley DOL: 4/28/2014 Closed: 5/26/2015

Francisco Barillas DOL: 4/26/2014 Closed: 5/6/2015

Harco National
Insurance Company DOL: 5/19/2014 Closed: 3/10/2015

Record Series File Number 540 – Streets, Alleys, Sidewalks, Street Lights Retention: Permanent – May image CIP file after Notice of Completion is recorded Permanently Stored in City Clerk’s Laserfiche Records Depository

Bain Street Pavement Rehabilitation and Shoulder Improvement, #16-A.2 Notice of Completion recorded 10/1/2021

Fort Fremont Alley Reconstruction – Phase1, #20105
Notice of Completion recorded 6/22/2021

Lucretia Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, #20104
Notice of Completion recorded 6/22/2021

Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation – Phase 1, #20103 Notice of Completion recorded 7/21/2022

Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation – Phase 2, #21103 Notice of Completion recorded 10/28/2022

Pacific Avenue Street Improvement Project, #20107
Notice of Completion recorded 7/12/2022

2015-16 ADA Ramp and Sidewalk Upgrade, Project No. 15-G Notice of Completion recorded 10/6/2016

Record Series File Number 1030-08 – Public Records Requests Retention: Completion, plus 2 years

Public Records Act Requests 2019 and 2020

Record Series File Number 320-03 FPPC Forms
Statements of Economic Interests – Form 700s
Retention: Current, plus 7 years

Form 700 – Kim Jarrell Johnson (Left Office 12/15/2014) Form 700 – Richard Brooks (Left Office 03/04/2015)
Form 700 – Reginald Meigs (Left Office 3/31/2015)
Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.G

INITIATION OF A ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO AMEND CHAPTER

9.275 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE PETAINING TO
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES ; CEQA DETERMINATION:

THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND THE CITY’S

LOCAL CEQA GUIDELI NES PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELIN ES
SECTION 15061 (B) (3)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council initiate a Zoning Code Amendment to amend Chapter 9.275 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code pertaining to Wireless Communication Facilities (WCFs).

BACKGROUND
Prior to July 2011, the County of Riverside was responsible for processing land use entitlements in what is now the incorporated City of Jurupa Valley. Under the County’s purview, numerous WCFs were approved and constructed resulting in a proliferation of such uses. Many of these facilities still exist and many are damaged, not in compliance with conditions of approval, and some are considered to be contributing to blight.

Moreover, many owners of such facilities are now requesting alterations to existing facilities such as co -locating multiple service providers on a single -cell tower or adding equipment (arrays) that expand coverage for larger service areas.

Chapter 9.275 pertains to the regulation of Wireless Communication Facilities (WCFs) .

WCFs include the following: antennas; microwave dishes or horns; antenna structures; cell towers; equipment enclosures and the land upon which they are all situated. The City has not yet embarked on a comprehensive overhaul of its planning and zoning regulations but has instead, begun to amend code chapters on a section-by-section basis.

Over the last eleven (11) years, the City has administered the County’s regulations when processing applications for cellular towers in various locations and in multiple forms including: mono-palms; mono-eucalyptus trees, water tanks, disguised ball field lights, a

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

clock tower and flag poles. Other wireless facilities have also been approved but not required to include screening or any type of concealment in compliance with the development standards for the zone. In addition, some cell tower approvals were required to plant of trees or other landscaping, but such trees and landscaping were never installed and/or maintained. As a final note, new legislation has been passed since 2011 that limits a city’s ability to regulate most WCFs and the City ’s regulations are considered dated, cumbersome and redundant in places.

ANALYSIS
In an effort to ensure compliance with current federal and state regulations, the existing Wireless Communication Facilities section of the Municipal Code should be evaluated and updated where necessary. It may also be advantageous to develop design guidelines as much as governing laws may permit. In addition, the provisions should be reformatted to improve implementation and interpretation by end users. At a minimum, a new ordinance should clarify regulations for each of the following types of WCFs:
a) concealed wireless communication facilities (façade -mounted design feature facilities such as clock towers, screened roof -mounted facilities and entry statement signage facilities);
b) disguised wireless communication facilities (monopalms, monopines, ball field light poles, water towers, flag poles); and
c) co-located wireless communication facilities (facilities owned by other service providers that are attached to facilities owned by a different telecommunications provider):

A new ordinance should also include provisions for appropriate locations, a streamlined application process, and processing requirements and development standards . For example, the current code refers to permit application regulations in five (5) different places which could easily be combined to be more concise and easier to read. The current code also established requirements for approval that are repeated in several places but which use the same language.

The processing requirements for applying for a WCF should also be examined since many of the requirements are now included in the land use entitlement application.

Including the application requirements in th e Municipal Code is redundant and unnecessary.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
The initiation of a Zoning Code Amendment is not subject to any noticing requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.H
ZONING CODE AMENDMENT ZCA 22004 (SHORT -TERM RENTALS) -

INITIATION OF A N AMENDMENT TO THE JURUPA VALLEY

MUNICIPAL CODE (JVMC) TO CLARIFY AND CODIFY THE

PROHIBITION OF SHORT -TERM RENTALS (STRS) IN ALL
RESIDENTIALLY ZONED DISTRICTS ; CEQA DETERMINATION: THE

PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND THE CITY’S LOCAL CEQA
GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B) (3)

RECOMMENDATION
By motion, initiate a Zonin g Code Amendment to codify the prohibition of Short-Term Rentals (STRs) in all residentially zoned districts.

DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The number of short-term rental residential dwelling units (generally defined as stays of less than 30 consecutive calendar days) has grown rapidly in Jurupa Valley and many other communities in recent years. The rapid growth is primarily due to hosting platform websites that provide an easy connection between property owners and individuals looking for short-term housing.

Many travelers now use short-term vacation rentals instead of traditional transient lodging options like hotels. Based on a recent analysis of the leading STR websites (e.g., Airbnb, Homeaway, VRBO, Craigslist, and Flipkey), more than eighty rentals are currently operating within the City. STRs are located throughout the City, with concentrations at the newer tract home communities, and listings may include entire homes or single rooms.

Based on public input and research by City staff, STRs are associated with well - documented negative secondary impacts, whi ch have detrimental effects on public health, safety, and welfare, including but not limited to additional traffic, excessive noise,

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

disorderly conduct, overcrowding, vandalism, parking problems, accumulation of refuse, crime and the overall degradation of a neighborhood’s residential character and quality.

STRs also remove housing stock that could otherwise be available for long-term rental or sale.

ANALYSIS
Jurupa Valley has adopted a permissive zoning scheme, which means that land use is prohibited if n ot identified as an allowable or conditionally allowed use in a zone.

Specifically, Section 9.35.030 provides that “When a use is not specifically listed as permitted or conditionally permitted in a zone classification, the use is prohibited unless in cir cumstances where this chapter empowers him to do so . The Community Development Director makes a determination that the use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those uses permitted or conditionally permitted in the zone classification.”
The Jurupa Valley Municipal Code does not expressly list STRs as permitted, and their commercial lodging characteristic differentiates them from the permitted uses in residential districts. Therefore, there is an existing prohibition under the permissive zoning argument. The Jurupa Valley Municipal Code generally lacks language about STRs or the length of stay at a rental. The only reference to any time restrictions for a dwelling, hotel, apartment, and lodging house is in Section 9.240.290, which discusses accessory dwelling units and prohibits rentals of such units for less than thirty-one days under state law.

Based on recent land use case law, the permissive zoning argument has been rejected by several courts, making this position challenging to support in litigation. While courts give great weight to how a city interprets its ordinances, there have been recent successful challenges against cities that have tried to prevent short -term rentals based upon a permissive zoning argument where their municipal codes have not explicitly prohibited the use. Therefore, if the City does not want to allow STRs in residential zones, the City should expressly prohibit these rentals. Adding specific language differentiating between short and long -term rentals and adding prohibition language in the municipal code would codify that STRs are not permitted within residentially zoned districts.

REGULATION OF STRS – SURROUNDING JURISDICTIONS
The City of Jurupa Valley is surrounded by seven communities: Eastvale, Ontario, Norco, Riverside, Fontana, Rialto, and Colton. Of the surrounding communities, two cities have enacted ordinances to expressly prohibit the use in residentially zoned areas (Eastvale, Norco).

ANTICIPATED MEETING SCHEDULE
The zoning code amendment is anticipated to have the following meeting schedule.

Anticipated meeting dates may change depending on additional outreach, planning efforts, workshops, or hearings. Table No. 1 provides a summary of the expected meeting schedule and actions.

Page | 3

TABLE NO. 1 - ANTICIPATE THE MEETING SCHEDULE

BODY ANTICIPATED

MEETING DATE
ACTION
Planning Commission March 2023 Hold the required public hearing and provide a recommendation to the City Council.

City Council April 2023 Hold the required public hearing and take action on the code amendment.

City Council May 2023 Second reading of the text amendment ordinance (if the first reading is approved).

INITIATION
The following considerations apply to the initiation process, which only enables the code amendment process to begin:

1. Initiation of a code amendment does not entail an evaluation of the merits of the proposed project but only whether or not to proceed with a formal evaluation process and public hearings.

2. The Council may express its opinions on whether the City should proceed with the formal evaluation process but should reserve its views regarding the merits of the ultimate action on the amendment until the evaluation process and public hearing have been completed.

3. Once the formal evaluation process and public hearings are completed, the City Council can approve, disapprove, or make changes to the recommended Code Amendment.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
The initiation of a Zoning Code Amendment must be noticed as a consent item on the City Council’s Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b ) (3). The common sense exem ption applies to the project since it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The expenses related to the proposed code amendment would be paid from the General Fund.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.I
APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF TWO FORD F -150 V6 ECO BOOST

PICK UP TRUCKS FROM CITRUS FORD

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve the purchase of two 2023 Ford F -150 EcoBoost V6 Pick -Up Trucks , at the cost of $ 89,822.48 utilizing funding from the Assembly Bill 2766 ("AB 2766") Program ("Program") of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, (“SCAQMD”), included in FY 2022- 23 Budget.

BACKGROUND
The City has been making a reasonable effort to gradually acquire its own vehicles since its incorporation in 2011. In March 2015, the City Council approved the purchase of eight pick-up trucks and six Ford C-Max passenger vehicles to be used by the Code Enforcement, Public Works, and the Building Inspection staff.

General fund is enhanced with funding for vehicle purchases made possible through AB 2766, which formed the Motor Vehicle Subvention Fund Program. The funds for the Program are distributed by the SCAQMD; the district provides funding to cities and counties to assist in developing clean transportation programs and reducing vehicle emissions.

In August 2022, the City Council appr oved the purchase of a Toyota Highlander Hybrid LE. Public Works Department utilizes pick-up trucks and passenger vehicles for inspection use. The City fleet continues to grow along with in-house staffing, and now includes two Nissan Frontiers, two Toyota Highlander, six (Hybrid) Ford Escapes, one Hybrid Toyota RAV4, one gas Toyota RAV4, one F-350 Dump Truck

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 3

Attachments:

1. PO 122722-01

2. PO 122822-02

�-r'ikT
_Ag-ti&# �1.

Purchase Order
Date: December 27, 2022
P.O. Number 122722·01
Vendor Number: 03439
Vendor
Citrus Motors Ford
1375 S. Woodruff Way
Ontario, CA 91761
Terms: Net 30
I ship To
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Phone: (951)332-6464
Contact: Dave French
Contact: Vinnie Lora
Phone: {909) 390-9700
Email: [email protected]
Ship Via Shipping Method I Shipping Terms
Ground
Line Qty Description
Delivery Date
FOB Destination
Unit Price Total
1 1 2023 Ford F-150 XL VIN 1FTNF1C86PKD07585 V6 ECO $ 41,560.00 $41,560.00 2 3
4 1
1 1
Boost - AQMD Eligible
OMV Document Processing Fee
MVSC Fee
CA Tire Fee
Rod Butler, City Manager
$
$
$

85.00 30.00

8.75 Sub-total
Tax 7.75%
$85.00
$30.00
$8.75
$41,683.75
3,227.49
Total PO $ 44,911.24
Should you have any inquiries concerning this purchase order, please contact Rebecca Abeyta, Purchasing Analyst Account Code: 230-2300-62400

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.J

AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE

JURUPA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TO PROVIDE GRAFFITI

ABATEMENT SERVICES ON PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and the Jurupa Community Services District for graffiti abatement services on private property for an amount not to exceed $80,000.00 per each fiscal year and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

2. That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and the Jurupa Community Services District for graffiti abatement services in the public right-of-way for an amount not to exceed $20,000.00 per each fiscal year and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.

BACKGROUND
The Jurupa Community Services District (“JCSD”) has long provided graffiti abatement within its district area, which covers a substantial portion of the City. For the areas outside of JCSD’s service area, the City entered into an agreement with Riverside County. In 2013, JCSD extended their graffiti abatement services beyond its district boundaries to include the entire City. Subsequently, the City elected not to renew its agreement with Riverside County and JCSD has been exclusively providing the services since.

The agreement for graffiti abatement services was entered into by the City and JCSD on December 3, 2013. The agreement has now expired and to continue to receive the services, a new agreement between the City and JCSD is required.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

ANALYSIS

JCSD provides monthly reports to the City , which details all service requests received and identifies the graffiti damaged areas. In 2022, JCSD respon ded to over 1,5 00 incidents of graffiti totaling over 35,000 square feet. The proposed agreements allows the City and members of the public to report graffiti directly to JCSD through a graffiti hotline, the JCSD website, or through the “My JCSD” smartphone application . For convenience, residents may also report graffiti through the “My Jurupa Valley” smartphone application.

If approved, the City will pay a monthly fixed fee of $6,666.66 for private graffiti abatement services and $1,666.66 for the public right -of-way. There is no increase in the cost of services under the proposed agreements . The proposed term of the agreements is through June 30, 2025. By mutual agreement, the term may be extended up to an additional two, one -year extensions at the same rate. JCSD con tinues to respond to graffiti promptly and maintains consistent communication with the City in addition to providing the monthly graffiti reports.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The cost to the City is approximately $ 100,000 per fiscal year for graffiti abatement services. Funds for this expenditure are budgeted in accounts 100-1240-54255 and 200- 2000-54255.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternate direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.K

ACCEPTANCE OF ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
(ACFR) AUDITED BY INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, EIDE BAILLY

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the attached ACFR audited by the City’s Independent Auditors, Eide Bailly (CPAs).

BACKGROUND
Each year, the City contracts with external independent auditors to audit the City’s financial statements, report to Council on the City’s financial position and offer an opinion on the accuracy of the information reported.

The ACFR summarizes the financial condition of the City as of June 30, 20 22 and is the result of the annual audit of the City’s financial accounting records In their reports, the auditor’s opinion states the attached financial statements fairly present the financial position of the City in all material respects.

OTHER INFORMATION
None.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The final audited fund balance for the City’s General Fund was $33,706,526 for the year ending June 30, 20 22. Of this balance, the amount of $8.21 million is from developer contributions since inception in Fiscal Year 2013/2014 and City staff is working on assigning these contributions to future projects.

RETURN TO AGENDA

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

CALIFORNIA

ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022

F
inancial Statements
June 30, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley, California
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Table of Contents
June 30, 2022
I
ntroductory Section
Letter of Transmittal ......................................................................................................................................... i Organizational Chart ...................................................................................................................................... viii Principal Officers ............................................................................................................................................. ix Independent Auditor’s Report ............................................................................................................................. 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ............................................................................................................... 5 Basic Financial Statements
Government Wide Financial Statements
Statement of Net Position ..............................................................................................................................15 Statement of Activities ...................................................................................................................................16 Fund Financial Statements
Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds .............................................................................................................18 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position ...........................19 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds ........................20 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities ...........................................................................................................21 Proprietary Funds
Statement of Fund Net Position ......................................................................................................................22 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position ............................................................23 Statement of Cash Flows ................................................................................................................................24 Notes to Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................25 Required Supplementary Information
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in the Fund Balance – Budget to Actual General Fund ..............................................................................................................................................48 Gas Tax Fund ..............................................................................................................................................49 Measure A Fund .........................................................................................................................................50 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund ......................................................................................................51 Note to the Required Supplementary Information ..........................................................................................52 Supplementary Information
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Balance Sheet ...........................................................................................................................55 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances ......................................59 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget to Actual Air Quality Improvement Fund (AQMD) Fund .............................................................................................63 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund ...................................................................................64 COPS Fund ..................................................................................................................................................65 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Fund .................................................................................66 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Grant Fund ................................................................................67 CalRecycle Grant Fund ................................................................................................................................68 Community Facilities District (CFD) Fund ....................................................................................................69 Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD) Fund .......................................................................70 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Table of Contents
June 30, 2022
P
roprietary Funds
Combining Statement of Net Position .............................................................................................................72 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position ...........................................73 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ...............................................................................................................74 Statistical Section
Net Position by Components ..........................................................................................................................75 Changes in Net Position ..................................................................................................................................76 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ...........................................................................................................77 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds .........................................................................................78 Tax Revenues by Source, General Fund ...........................................................................................................79 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property ..............................................................................80 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates .....................................................................................................81 Principal Property Taxpayers ..........................................................................................................................82 Property Tax Levies and Collections ................................................................................................................83 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type ................................................................................................................84 Legal Debt Margin Information .......................................................................................................................85 Pledged Revenue Coverage ............................................................................................................................86 Demographic and Economic Statistics .............................................................................................................87 Employment by Industry .................................................................................................................................88 Full-time City Employees by Function .............................................................................................................89 Taxable Sales by Category ...............................................................................................................................90 Top 25 Sales Tax Producers .............................................................................................................................91 T
ransmittal Message
J
anuary 9, 2023
H
onorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and Citizens of the City of Jurupa Valley F
iscal Year 2021-22 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) I
t is with great pleasure that we present to you the City of Jurupa Valley’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report ( ACFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 . This report gives its readers a comprehensive view of the City’s financial activities during the fiscal year and financial position at the end of the fiscal year. The basic financial statements are presented in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). They were audited in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) by a firm of licensed certified public accountants.

T
his report consists of management representations concerning the finances of the City of Jurupa Valley in its eleventh year of incorporation. Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all information presented in the report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management has implemented a comprehensive internal control framework that is designed both to protect the City’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information to prepare the City’s financial statements in conformity to GAAP.

The City’s internal control procedures are established on the principle that the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits. As a result the City has designed the internal control systems to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatements. As management, we assert that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects.

M
anagement also recognizes that the internal control environment changes over time due to changes in operation or the personnel performing various duties. As a result, the internal control environment is continuously being assessed to ensure that adequate controls still exist within the City to achieve the City’s objectives.

E
ide Bailly, LLP, an independent firm of certified public accountants have audited the City’s financial statements. The purpose of an independent audit is to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the City of Jurupa Valley for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 are free of any material misstatements. The independent auditor’s report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. GAAP require that management provide a narrative of introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A).

T
his transmittal message is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The MD&A can be found immediately following the independent auditor’s report in the financial section of this report.
i
Profile of the Government
T
he City of Jurupa Valley, California was incorporated as a general law city effective July 1, 2011.

Jurupa Valley is the 28 th city in Riverside County and newest city in California. The City is located approximately 50 miles southeast of Los Angeles and has an estimated population of 107,083.

Located in Western Riverside County, in an area also known as the Inland Empire, the city covers approximately 46 square miles, with the borders running along the 15 freeway to the west, the Santa Ana River to the south and east and San Bernardino County to the north.

A
community of communities , the City of Jurupa Valley joined together the unincorporated areas of Riverside County previously known as Mira Loma, Glen Avon, Pedley, Indian Hills, Jurupa Hills, Sunnyslope, Crestmore Heights, Rubidoux, and Belltown.

T
he City operates under a Council -Manager form of government. Under this form of government, policy-making and legislative authority are vested in the City Council consisting of five (5) members elected by district. The City Council responsibilities include, but are not limited to, passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees and commissions, and hiring both the City Manager and City Attorney. The Council Members serve four (4) year terms and the Mayor is appointed annually by and from the City Council. As Chief Executive Officer, the City Manager is responsible for administering programs in accordance with policies established by the City Council and within the guidelines of the annual budget adopted by the City Council.

T
his report includes all funds of the City. It includes all governmental organizations and activities for which the City of Jurupa Valley’s City Co uncil is financially accountable. The City provides a wide range of services including planning, building, public works, engineering, code enforcement, and general administrative activities. Services including library, police, animal control and fire protection are also provided to the City and its citizens through contracts with the County of Riverside. Other services are provided directly through other agencies. Water and sewer services are delivered by the Jurupa Community Services District, the Rubidoux Community Services District and Santa Ana River Water Company. Parks and recreation services are provided by the Jurupa Area Recreation and Parks District. Public transit is provided through the Riverside Transit Agency. The City has franchise agreements for electricity service through Southern California Edison, natural gas through the Gas Company, refuse collection through Burrtec, and cable service through state franchise agre ements with Pacific Bell (AT&T) and Charter Communications.

C
ity Milestones
S
B 132 funding - The City of Jurupa Valley entered into an agreement with County of Riverside Transportation Department and Riverside County Transportation Commission ( RCTC) for a Grade Separation Improvement at the intersection of Van Buren Boulevard and Jurupa Road. The project is funded with $108.4 million of SB 132 monies with an additional $25 million funded in 2021-22 through RCTC. This project is currently in the construction phase.

M
easure A – Projects completed by the City of Jurupa Valley in 2021-22 with Measure A funds were Bain St. Pavement Rehab. and Shoulder Improvements (Limonite to Bellegrave) for $1 million and Mission Blvd pavement Rehab. Phase 1 (Pyrite to Valley Way) for $300 thousand. The City has allocated Measure A funds in 2022 -23 for continuing and new projects including; the Pacific Ave Pedestrian & Bicycle Improvements (42 nd to Mission) for $774 thousand; Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure for $ 274 thousand; Mission Pavement Rehab. Phase 3 (Ben Nevis to Bellegrave) for $330 thousand; 2022 -2023 Citywide Slurry Seal for $500 thousand; 2022- 2023 Citywide Pavement Rehab. for $1.5 million; and 2022-2023 Mira Loma Pavement Rehab. Phase 2 (58th, 56th, 54th, Ridgeview, Troth, Marlatt and Dodd) project for $465 thousand. ii
TUMF - The City of Jurupa Valley has Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee program ( TUMF) allocations for various continuing and new projects in 2022-23. The design phase for the Van Buren Blvd. (Limonite Ave to Santa Ana River) Widening project was completed in 2021-22, and $5.4 million has been allocated for the remaining phases . Additional project allocations include the Market St.

Bridge (crossing Santa Ana River) project for $2.6 million; Market St. Widening (Santa Ana River to Rubidoux Blvd) project for $4.1 million; Limonite Ave Widening (Bain to Homestead) for $400 thousand; and Rubidoux-SR60 Interchange Improvement for $617 thousand.

C
ommunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Projects completed with CDBG funds during 2021- 22 include the Pacific Ave. improvement project (Mission to SR60) project completed July 2021 for $447 thousand and the Mission Blvd ADA improvement (Ben Nevis to Valley Way) project completed October 2021 for $250 thousand. The Old Mira Loma Pavement Rehab Phase I project was completed early in 2022 -23 (August 2022). The City has allocated CDBG funds in 2022 -23 to the following continuing and new projects : Old Mira Loma Pavement Rehab. Phase 2 project for $425 thousand and the Pacific Ave. Pedestrian & Bicycle Improvements (42nd to Mission) for $341 thousand.

H
ighway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) - The City of Jurupa Valley completed the Pedley Road improvements project from 60th Street to north of Kim Lane for $1.2 million on March 2021, and received the final reimbursement for the project from Cal Trans in 2021-22. The City was awarded two grants for continued Citywide Guardrail replacement and signal and other safety upgrades for $125,000 and $2.2 million.

R
oad Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) – During 2021-22, the City completed the Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation Phase One (Pyrite to Valley Way) project for $1.3 million using RMRA funds. The City has allocated RMRA funds in 2022-23 to the following continuing and new projects: Granite Hill Pavement Rehab. (Py rite to Edgewood Point) for $447 thousand; 2021- 2022 Citywide Pavement Rehab. (Rubidoux-SR60, 29th, Limonite - Felspar to Pedley, Jurupa Rd – Agate to Galena) for $1 million; Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehab. Phase 2 (Bellegrave to Pyrite) for $1.4 million; Mission Pavement Rehab. Phase 3 (Ben Nevis to Bellegrave) for $1.4 million; Van Buren Pavement Rehab. Phase 3 (Bellegrave to Etiwanda) for $2.1 million.

A
ccela - The City purchased and implemented the Accela permitting software in August 2019 to improve efficiency between the Building, Engineering, and Community Development departments of the City. Staff is in the process of implementing new processes and procedures within Accela to add efficiencies and services offered to residents and City businesses including an online business registration process, online payments and implementing City GIS system through Accela.

R
elevant Financial Policies
T
he City has a set of financial policies that it abides by. It continually reviews and updates the policies as the needs of the City change to comply with any new and applicable legislation. Initially following incorporation, the City adopted all of Riverside County’s Ordinances. As the City develops its own unique needs, it will revise t hese former County Ordinances to directly address the Ci ty’s goals. In Fiscal Y ear 2021-22 the City updated the City Investment Policy to build a diversified investment portfolio in addition to the City’s current investments in the State of California Treasurer Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) program.

T
he Budget Process
Eac
h year the City embarks on a strategic budget process beginning in the spring with a discussion of the City Council goals and priorities. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City of Jurupa Valley’s financial planning and control of both operating and capital expenditures. iii
T
he City maintains budgetary controls to ensure compliance with the legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City Council. The proposed budget is submitted to the City Council and a public meeting is conducted to allow taxpayers the opportunity to comment on the proposed budget. Subsequently, the budget is adopted by the City Council through the passage of resolutions. Throughout the year, the City Council may amend the budget to add or remove appropriations, transfer appropriations within a fund or change appropriations between funds.

Loc
al Economy
The
information presented in the financial statements is perhaps best understood when it is considered within the specific economic environment that exists in City of Jurupa Valley.

T
he City of Jurupa Valley had a consistent annual decrease in the unemployment rate prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. For calendar year 2021, the City had an unemployment rate of 7.0%; this was lower than the unemployment rate of 7.4% for the Riverside , San Bernardino and Ontario Region.

Overall, job gains are expected to continue to increase for the Riverside, San Bernardino and Ontario Region in 2022, after more than 86,100 jobs were added from October 2021 to October 2022 . The unemployment rate for the Riverside, San Bernardino and Ontario Region as of October 2022 was

3.9% and the current unemployment rate for the City, as of October 2022 , is 3 .3%. Based on forecasted calculations, the estimated unemployment rate for 2022 will continue at a low rate.

Source: State of California Employment Development Department (EDD) Labor Force Data T
he Inland Empire continues to see increased prices for new and existing homes. Jurupa Valley continues to be an attractive location for developers with the availability of vacant land and the continued price advantage over the coastal counties.

T
he price advantage of median priced new and existing homes a nd the availability of affordable housing will continue to attract future homebuyers to the area and continue to create a demand for new housing. Riverside County’s first quarter 2022 median home price of $579,000 for new and existing homes is a significant increase of 24.52% from last year’s $465,000. iv
The C
ity of Jurupa Valley experienced an increase in the number of Building Permits Issued to 3,250 in FY 2021-22. New home permits increased by 633 as compared to the increase of 458 in FY 2020- 21; and the decrease of (171) in FY 2019-20.

N
ew Dwelling Units are up 6.51% due to continued growth within the City of Jurupa Valley and continued need for housing and the State of California housing shortage. The City continues to remain attractive to developers and new homebuyers due to its close proximity to major freeways and to the Ontario International Airport.
v

Community Development – The Community Development Department is actively working with the City Manager and Assistant City Manager on major high- profile projects in the development pipeline: Shops at Jurupa Valley, Vernola Ranch, Rio Vista, Paradise Knolls, District at Jurupa Valley, and Emerald Ridge North and South. The following projects were approved in FY 2021/2022:

• Appaloosa Springs: A new residential development consisting of 254 single-family lots, located at 6501 Clay St.
• The Shops at Jurupa Valley: A new 32-acre shopping, dining, and commercial development on the corner of Pyrite St. and Mission Blvd. When finished, the “Shops at Jurupa Valley” project will include over 20 new buildings and over 230,000 square feet of retail/commercial space
• Autozone: New 7,380 sq ft. Autozone on the southeast corner of Limonite and Corey Blvd. • Tractor Supply: Neighborhood commercial center and store with 2 drive- thrus at southwest corner of Sierra and Armstrong
• Space Center: Construction and operation of two warehouse buildings with a total of 1,124,015 sf of industrial warehouse space and 20,000 sf of office space • Troy Court Industrial : A new 191,196 square- foot industrial park (total 3 buildings) at 4725, 4790, & 4795 Troy Court
• Agua Mansa Road Development : A new Development on a 23.44 gross -acre property consisting of two industrial buildings totaling 335,002 square feet

Development along with increasing assessed value of existing homes in Jurupa Valley continue to contribute to higher property tax valuations within the City. These key factors have resulted in significant increases in the City’s property tax valuation. This trend is expected to continue over the next few years due to approval of several major, commercial, and industrial development projects and the number of new homes being built and sold within the City limits.

vi
FY 2022-23 Budgetary Highlights

• FY 22-23 General Fund Expenditures total $54,725,143 which represents a 9.3 % increase over the prior year. Two of the largest increases where due to increase in Public Safety and Cost of Living for City Staff.
• The City organization continues to grow in a manner that ensures service delivery is responsive to needs while remaining fiscally prudent. Staffing plans continue to be developed with the Director of Building/Code Enforcement, Director of Community Development, and Director of Public Works/City Engineer each year. This has resulted in new employees being hired, service levels being increased, and significant cost savings being realized in FY 2021-22.
• The City will increase budget and financial oversight and continue the process of establishing new policies and multi-year financial planning (e.g. formed an investment committee, updated investment policy, and quarterly investment reports).
• The City will c ontinue developing long-term plans for the Jurupa Valley Operations Center’s (JVOC) use after completing the acquisition of the building in 2020- 21 and transitioning over 20 employees from City Hall to the new building in 2021-22. • The City allocated the amount of $40 thousand for Non-profit organizations. • Implemented a new policy to create Public Safety Community Facilities Districts (CFD’s) for each new residential development to establish an additional revenue stream to fund enhanced law enforcement and fire services as development continues. • Sales tax revenues remain stable for the City budget. • Increased property tax revenue due to new home development and the increased valuation of existing homes.

Acknowledgements

The preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report could not have been accomplished without the dedication and effort of the entire Administrative Services and Finance Department staff and the independent auditors, Eide Bail ly, LLP. I would also like to thank the City Council for their participation and direction in setting forth each annual budget and for their effort and support throughout the year.

Respectfully submitted,

Rod B. Butler
City Manager

vii

viii

i
x

What inspires you, inspires us. | eidebailly.com
10681 Foothill Blvd., Ste. 300 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3831 | T 909.466.4410 | F 909.466.4431 | EOE 1 Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Members of the City Council
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Jurupa Valley, California (City) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2022, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Adoption of New Accounting Standard
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the City has adopted the provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 87, Leases, for the year ended June 30, 2022.

Accordingly, a restatement has been made to the governmental activities, general fund and aggregate remaining funds’ net position or fund balance as of July 1, 2021. Our opinions are not modified with respect to this matter.
2 Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.

A
uditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.

In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
• Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control–related matters that we identified during the audit.
3 Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis, the schedule of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance – budget to actual for the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, Measure A Fund, and ARPA Fund, and the related notes, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The combining and individual non-major fund financial statements and budgetary comparison schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual non-major fund financial statements and budgetary comparison schedules are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

Other Information
Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other information comprises the introductory and statistical sections but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial statements do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report. 4 Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 9, 2023, on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

Rancho Cucamonga, California
January 9, 2023
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
5 M
anagement’s Discussion and Analysis
The following Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the City of Jurupa Valley’s (City) financial condition and performance provides an introduction and overview of the financial activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Since the MD&A is designed to be condensed, we encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal and the basic financial statements including the accompanying notes to financial statements.

Financial Highlights
• T
otal assets of the City at June 30, 2022 were $168.32 million and exceeded total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources of $56.52 million by $111.80 million. The difference between total assets and total liabilities is referred to as total net position. • As of June 30, 2022, the City’s governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $69.80 million. Approximately $36.35 million of the governmental funds’ fund balance is restricted. The remaining fund balance of $33.44 million, or 47.91%, is unassigned. In April 2021, the City adopted General Fund Reserve policy that designates reserves from this unassigned balance for Catastrophic Reserves (15% of general fund annual operating expenditures for unforeseen emergencies) and for Budget Stabilization Reserves (25% of general fund annual operating revenues to mitigate annual budget shortfalls should they occur) (see Note 1 – Fund Equity in Notes to Financial Statements).

Reserve requirements were met for the current fiscal year. • In October 2016, pursuant to an Installment Sales Agreement, the City issued $8,165,000 of Certificates of Participation Series 2016, the proceeds of which have been used to finance the design, acquisition, and construction of certain local roadway improvements and street resurfacing projects within the jurisdiction of the City. All funds for Certificates of Participation Series 2016 have been spent. The debt service payments are pledged and from County Measure A sales tax override funds and five payments remain (see Note 8 in Notes to Financial Statements-Long Term Liabilities). • In June 2021, pursuant to a lease-leaseback agreement, the City issued $6,935,000 of Certifications of Participation 2021 Building Acquisition Project. The City purchased a building from the County of Riverside and paid for the purchase with $4,000,000 of general fund reserves and used proceeds from the issuance of the 2021 Building Acquisition Project certificates for the remaining balance of the purchase. The purchased building, the Jurupa Valley Operations Center (JVOC), is included in the June 30, 2022 financial statements as a capital asset. The debt service payments for this issuance are made from general fund revenues. Staff from various city departments including building, code enforcement, and public works are based out of JVOC (see Note 8 in Notes to Financial Statements- Long Term Liabilities).
• Due to other governments increased by $0.37 million due to an increase in taxes that affect the revenue neutrality payment amount. The revenue neutrality payment to the County of Riverside for fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 was properly accrued in accordance with the Revenue and Neutrality Agreement by and between the County of Riverside and the City of Jurupa Valley.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
6 • The City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 87, Leases, in fiscal year 2021-22. Implementation of this standard resulted in recognition of lease receivable and corresponding deferred inflow of resources of $1,002,877 as of July 1, 2021. Implementation of the standard did not result in an adjustment to beginning fund balance (see Note 12 in Notes to Financial Statements-Leases).

Overview of the Financial Statements
T
he financial statements presented herein include all of the activities of the City of Jurupa Valley as prescribed by GASB Statement No. 34, as amended. The MD&A is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s financial statements. The City’s basic financial statements are comprised of three components:
1)government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the basic financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves.

Government-wide financial statements: The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner that is similar to a private-sector business.

Government-wide financial statements include a statement of net position and a statement of activities.

The statement of net position presents information on all of the City’s assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases may provide a useful indicator on whether the financial position of the City is improving.

The statement of activities provides information showing how the City’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. These changes are reported using the full accrual basis of accounting, that is, when the economic event occurs, rather than when cash is received or paid. Under this basis of accounting, revenues and expenses are reported in the statement for some items that will only result in future cash inflows or outflows such as vacation earned but not paid and uncollected taxes, as well as reporting debt and capital assets on balance sheet.

Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (government activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business- type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, community development, public works, and public safety. The City does not have any business-type activities.

The government-wide financial statements can be found in the Table of Contents under the heading Basic Financial Statements.

Fund financial statements: A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
7 Governmental funds: Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike government- wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating the City’s near-term financing requirements.

Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City’s near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities.

The City maintains twenty-one individual governmental funds for financial reporting purposes; five of these funds did not have activity in 2021-22 and are therefore not presented in these financial statements.

Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the General Fund, Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund, Measure A Special Revenue Fund, American Rescue Plan (ARPA), and Development Impact Fee Capital Project Fund, which are considered to be major funds. Data from the remaining governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation Non-major Governmental Funds. Individual fund data for each of these non-major governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements in the supplementary information in this report.

The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for its general fund, special revenue funds and capital projects funds. A budgetary comparison schedule has been provided for the General Fund and each major Special Revenue Fund to demonstrate compliance with this budget.

The governmental fund financial statements can be found in the Table of Contents under the heading Basic Financial Statements.

Proprietary Funds: Proprietary funds account for two types of services – enterprise and internal services funds. The City maintains only internal service funds. Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the City’s various functions and departments. The City uses internal service funds to account for self-funded insurance and information services activities.

Because these funds predominantly benefit governmental activities rather than business-type functions, they have been included within governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.

The basic proprietary fund financial statements can be found in the Table of Contents under the heading Basic Financial Statements.

Fiduciary Funds: Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the City. In these cases, the City would have a fiduciary responsibility and act as a trustee. Previously, the City’s only fiduciary funds were reported as agency funds to account for development deposits made in conjunction with certain building, planning and engineering permits issued. However, with implementation of GASB 84 in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2021, the activity for these deposits is now presented in the general fund.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
8 Notes to Financial Statements: The notes to the financial statements provide additional information that is essential for a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements can be found in the Table of Contents under the heading Notes to Financial Statements.

Other Supplementary Information: In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents certain required supplementary information (RSI), about the City’s General Fund, the Gas Tax Fund, Measure A Fund, and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund budgetary comparison.

The Required Supplementary Information can be found following the Notes to Financial Statements.

The combining statements for non-major governmental funds and the budgetary comparison schedules for the non-major governmental funds can be found following the Required Supplementary Information.

The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major governmental funds are presented for all non-major Special Revenue and Capital Projects Funds.

Government-wide financial analysis
T
he government-wide financial statements provide long-term and short-term information about the City’s overall financial condition. This analysis addresses the financial statements of the City as a whole.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, City assets exceeded liabilities by $111.80 million as summarized in the schedule that follows.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022

9 Total assets increased $42.18 million as a result o f increases of $37.68 million in deposits to cash a nd investments (this increase includes deposit activit y recognized in governmental funds previously recognized in agency funds) and $742 thousand of capital assets and related depreciation being recorded.

Resources are utilized for investment in infrastruc ture and city vehicles. Depreciation expense for th e fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 was $3.67 million.

Current liabilities increased by $20.39 million primarily due to increases in: accounts payable for the year- end accruals, due to other governments for the reve nue neutrality year-end accrual, deposits payable recognized in governmental funds, and unearned revenue for the balance of funding received as part of the American Rescue Plan Act not expended as of June 30, 2022. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, the City had $11.01 million in long-term liabilitie s (not including the current portion of long-term liabilities). This balance is largely due to the b alance of Certificates of Participation (2016 and 2 021 Building Acquisition Project), for $10.97 million.

Net investment in capital assets represents 38.43% of the City’s net position due to the initial transfer of fixed assets from the County of Riverside and the s ubsequent accounting for donated assets and fixed assets acquired since incorporation. The City uses capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending.

Statement of Activities: The statement of activities shows how the City’s net position changed during the fiscal year 2021-2022. A summary of changes in net position is presented in the schedule that follows.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022

10 Total revenues increased by $4.39 million over the prior year, primarily due to increases of $1.30 million in sales taxes, $2.24 million in county Measure A and other state taxes, $1.01 million in charges for services for Building and Public Works Departments, $507 thousand in Developer Contributions, $310 thousand in Franchise Fees, and $375 thousand in reimbursable g rants. These increases were offset largely by a decrease of $1.31 million from one-time CARES act f unding recorded in the prior fiscal year, which was allocated and used for public safety expenditures.

Total expenses increased by $3.46 million over the prior year. Increases in expenditures are due to increases of $393 thousand for Revenue Neutrality payments to Riverside County; $1.27 million and $573 thousand for Sheriff and Animal Control Services, r espectively, for public safety; and $415 thousand i n insurance premiums for risk management. City person nel growth accounted for an increase of salaries and related expenses of $758 thousand in the general government categories (savings from conversion of staff impacted community development and public wor ks expenditures which experienced an overall increase of $19K and overall decrease of $262 thousand, respectively).

The charts below provide graphic representation of the City’s expenses compared to program revenues by function and its revenue by source.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022

11 The expense and program revenue chart for governmen tal activities is designed to reflect expenses associated with each City function and the revenues that are directly attributable to each function. It is important to note that general revenues such as pro perty, sales, and other taxes are not directly attributable to specific functions and are therefore used to support program activities citywide.

Financial Analysis of City’s Funds

As discussed earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance related legal requirements.

Governmental Funds: The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources . Such information is useful in assessing the City’s ability to meet financial obligations in the short- term. As an example, assigned and unassigned fund balance could serve as a useful measure of the City ’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year.

As of June 30, 2022, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $69.80 million. Of the $69.80 million, $36.35 million or 5 2.07% constitutes restricted fund balance, which ca n only be used for specific purposes due to external restrictions or enabling legislation. The majority of the remainder of fund balance is unassigned which represents the amount that is available for any purpose, including for designated reserves for catastrophic (unforeseen) emergencies and for mitigating annual budget shortfalls as discussed earlier.

Proprietary Funds: Proprietary funds provide the same type of informa tion found in the governmental- wide financial statements, but in more detail. The City’s Proprietary funds consist of two Internal Service funds. The Internal Service funds are presented as Governmental Activities in the Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities. The City uses the two funds to allocate the cost of the City’s information systems and risk management activities to various departments.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
12 General Fund Financial and Budgetary Highlights
T
he General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At June 30, 2022, unassigned fund balance was $33.69 million; $8.21 million of this balance is set aside from developer contributions since inception in Fiscal Year 2013/2014. As a measure of the General Fund’s financial condition, it may be useful to compare the unassigned fund balance to total expenditures. Unassigned fund balance represents 73.88% of the General Fund expenditures.

Overall, General Fund revenues for fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 totaled $56.43 million, compared to $52.88 million in the prior year. The major components are taxes of $46.21 million (which include property taxes of $9.10 million, sales taxes of $23.52 million, vehicle license fees of $8.81 million, and franchise taxes of $4.43 million); charges for services of $4.06 million, licenses, fees and permits of $2.35 million and developer contributions of $2.50 million.

General Fund expenditures total $45.61 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 compared to $45.75 million in the prior year. The major expenditure components are General government $13.50 million, Community development $5.40 million, Public works $3.04 million, and Public safety $23.34 million. The decrease is due to completion of onboarding formerly contracted positions in Community Development and Public Works departments to City staff. Decreases in General government of ($2.61) million and Public Works of ($1.44) million, were offset by an increase in Public safety expenditures of $3.31 million. The increase in Public Safety is largely due to general contract increases as well as public safety expenditures that were accounted for in a separate special revenue fund in prior year ($1.31 million in one-time CARES funding received). Furthermore, animal control services contract expenditures increased by $573 thousand.

The difference between General Fund budget and actual are summarized in the schedule that follows.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
13 • A
ctual revenues were above budget by $2.78 million.
• This is largely due to a $1.30 million increase in sales taxes, and $1.01 million increase in charges for services.
• Actual expenditures were below budget by $4.82 million. Detailed variances include:
• Public works project expenditures were lower than budgeted by $4.3 million due to construction project timing; however, these expenses are likely to occur in subsequent periods. Furthermore, conversion of contracted staff to City employees contributed to favorable expenditure variances related to consulting expenditures for public works. • Public safety expenditures were lower than budgeted by $850 thousand. • The above decreases were largely offset by the revenue neutrality expenditure, which was $393 thousand larger because underlying revenues affecting the revenue neutrality payment calculation were higher than budgeted.

Capital Assets and Debt Administration
C
apital Assets: City investment in capital assets for its governmental type activities as of June 30, 2022, amounted to $54.13 million (net of accumulated depreciation). Investment in capital assets includes infrastructure assets as well as land, buildings, improvements, equipment and vehicles.

Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in the notes to basic financial statements and a summary is provided in the schedule that follows.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
14 Long-term debt: At the end of fiscal year 2021-2022, the City had outstanding long-term debt of $11.01 million. Long-term debt is largely due to the principal balances of $3.77 million for Certificates of Participation (CoP) 2016 and $6.63 million for CoP 2021 (Building Acquisition Project). The latter were issued to partially fund the building purchase for the Jurupa Valley Operations Center as discussed earlier (see Note 8 in Notes to Financial Statements). Furthermore, compensated absences payable increased due to an increase in City employees.

Economic Factors and Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget
T
he fiscal year 2022-2023 City budget was prepared conservatively. Property tax estimates were projected with minimal growth from the previous fiscal year and there were no tax rate or fee increases as part of the preparation and adoption of the fiscal year 2022-2023 budget. Therefore, the projected 2022-23 increase to general fund balance is $699 thousand.

Although the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the City and our residents, sales tax revenue projections for 2022-23 since budget adoption appear to be encouraging, although recent statewide forecasts foresee potential general economic declines. The City continues to review and evaluate the impact of the coronavirus pandemic including the use of pandemic related funding issued by the federal government in response to the economic effects of the pandemic.

Requests for Information
T
his financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City’s finances for all those with interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report, or requests for additional information should be addressed to the City Clerk, City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509, or call (951) 332-6464.

S
ee Notes to Financial Statements 15
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2022
Governmental
Activities
Assets
Cash and investments 100,902,330$
Receivables
Accounts 1,162,552
Due from other governments 9,583,534
Interest 118,516
Deposits 107,887
Leases 1,480,297
Prepaid expense 30,518
Restricted cash and investments 798,492
Non-current assets
Capital assets not being depreciated 7,808,993
Capital assets net of accumulated depreciation 46,324,224 Total assets 168,317,343
Liabilities
Accounts payable 11,504,243
Accrued liabilities 137,184
Due to other governments 7,827,936
Deposits payable 9,201,896
Interest payable 73,400
Unearned revenue 14,009,107
Noncurrent liabilities
Due within one year
Compensated absences 309,768
Certificates of participation 995,000
Due in more than one year
Compensated absences 37,987
Certificates of participation 10,967,110
Total liabilities 55,063,631
Deferred Inflows of Resources
Leases 1,454,212
Net Position
Net investment in capital assets 42,969,599
Restricted for
Community development 6,085,676
Public works 30,521,507
Unrestricted 32,222,718
Total net position 111,799,500$
S
ee Notes to Financial Statements 16
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Statement of Activities
Year Ended June 30, 2022
Program Revenues
Net (Expense)
Operating Capital Revenue and
Charges for Grants and Grants and Changes in Net
Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Position Governmental Activities
General government 14,891,839$ 252,660$ 2,979,216$ 302,635$ (11,357,328)$ Community
development 7,819,805 4,177,099 5,983,678 - 2,340,972 Public works 7,949,002 2,145,286 10,370,106 2,685,959 7,252,349 Public safety 23,341,265 464,933 273,689 - (22,602,643) Interest and fiscal
charges 316,416 - - - (316,416)
Total governmental
activities 54,318,327$ 7,039,978$ 19,606,689$ 2,988,594$ (24,683,066) General revenues
Taxes
Property taxes 8,447,517
Sales taxes 23,515,825
Franchise taxes 4,431,196
Transient occupancy taxes 352,179
Property transfer tax 653,472
Property taxes in lieu of motor vehicle fee 8,807,710
Investment income (loss), unrestricted (592,399)
Other 490,471
Total general revenues 46,105,971
Change in Net Position 21,422,905
Net Position, Beginning of Year 90,376,595
Net Position, End of Year 111,799,500$
1 7
General Fund
The General Fund has been classified as a major fund and is used to account for revenues and expenditures that are not required to be accounted for in another fund.

Major Special Revenue Funds
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for specific revenues that are legally restricted to expenditure for a particular purpose. The following funds have been classified as major funds. The budget to actual comparison for these funds has been presented in the accompanying financial statements as Required Supplementary Information:

Gas Tax Fund
To account for revenue received for gasoline taxes under Sections 2105, 2106, 2107, 2107.5 and 2032(h)(2) of the Street and Highway Code to be used solely for transportation related purposes.

Measure A Fund
To account for revenue received from the County of Riverside from a special ½% sales tax to be used for street maintenance and improvements only. In addition, the fund accounts for the repayment of the Measure A COP Series 2016 payable from Measure A revenue.

American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund
To account for revenue received from the U.S Department of Treasury from the local allocation for the American Rescue Plan Act to provide relief funds that have been negatively impacted from the coronavirus pandemic.

Major Capital Project Funds
Major Capital Project Funds are used to account for capital expenditures funded from general revenues and to account for the financing, construction, and administrative activities of the City.

Developer Impact Fees
This fund is used to account for the receipt of fees for development related activities such as infrastructure and public facilities.

S
ee Notes to Financial Statements 18
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
Capital
Non-Major
Developer Governmental
General Gas Tax Measure A ARPA Impact Fees Funds Totals Assets
Cash and investments 51,471,612$ 3,911,176$ 3,864,124$ 14,011,507$ 19,321,013$ 8,322,898$ 100,902,330$ Accounts receivable 1,162,552 - - - - - 1,162,552
Intergovernmental receivable 6,796,711 564,486 986,388 - - 788,448 9,136,033 Due from other funds 1,049,058 - - - - - 1,049,058 Due from other governments 339,412 - - - - 108,089 447,501 Deposits receivable - - - - - 107,887 107,887
Interest receivable 76,144 4,804 5,005 - 22,676 9,887 118,516 Lease Receivable 501,331 - - - - 978,966 1,480,297
Cash and investments -
restricted - - - - - 798,492 798,492
Prepaid expense 13,391 - - - - - 13,391
Total assets 61,410,211$ 4,480,466$ 4,855,517$ 14,011,507$ 19,343,689$ 11,114,667$ 115,216,057$ Liabilities and fund balances
Liabilities
Accounts payable 9,980,397$ 454,332$ 518,425$ 2,400$ -$ 535,231$ 11,490,785$ Accrued liabilities 137,184 - - - - - 137,184
Due to other governments 7,827,936 - - - - - 7,827,936 Due to other funds - - - - - 1,045,389 1,045,389
Unearned revenue - - - 14,009,107 - - 14,009,107
Deposits payable 9,118,293 - - - - 83,603 9,201,896 Total liabilities 27,063,810 454,332 518,425 14,011,507 - 1,664,223 43,712,297 Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue 140,594 - - - - 108,089 248,683 Leases 499,281 - - - - 954,931 1,454,212
Total deferred inflows
of resources 639,875 - - - - 1,063,020 1,702,895 Fund balances
Nonspendable 13,391 - - - - - 13,391
Restricted for
Community development - - - - - 5,931,691 5,931,691 Public works - 4,026,134 4,337,092 - 19,343,689 2,706,503 30,413,418 Unassigned 33,693,135 - - - - (250,770) 33,442,365 Total fund balances 33,706,526 4,026,134 4,337,092 - 19,343,689 8,387,424 69,800,865 Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources
and fund balances 61,410,211$ 4,480,466$ 4,855,517$ 14,011,507$ 19,343,689$ 11,114,667$ 115,216,057$ Special Revenue Fund Project Fund

See Notes to Financial Statements 19
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position June 30, 2022

Fund Balances of the Governmental Funds 69,800,865 $
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because
Capital assets net of depreciation have not been included as financial resources in governmental fund activity.

Nondepreciable assets 7,808,993
Depreciable assets, net of accumulated depreciation 46,324,224 Revenues reported as deferred inflows in the governmental funds do not provide current financial resources but are recognized in the statement of activities. 248,683 Noncurrent liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in governmental funds. Those noncurrent liabilities consist of:

Certificates of participation (11,962,110)
Compensated absences (347,755)
Accrued interest payable on long-term liabilities do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds. (73,400)
Net Position of Governmental Activities 111,799,500 $

See Notes to Financial Statements 20
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2022

Non-major
Developer Governmental
General Gas Tax Measure A ARPA Impact Fees Funds Totals Revenues
Taxes 46,207,899 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 46,207,899 $ Licenses and permits 2,353,249 - - - - - 2,353,249 Intergovernmental 594,601 4,714,799 3,897,841 29,400 - 2,993,203 12,229,844 Charges for services 4,060,345 - - - - - 4,060,345 Developer impact fees - - - - 5,135,262 - 5,135,262 Fines and forfeitures 626,384 - - - - - 626,384 Developer contributions 2,498,780 - - - - - 2,498,780 Assessments revenue - - - - - 2,534,528 2,534,528 Investment income (loss) (389,077) (21,787) (22,306) - (112,052) (47,177) (592,399) Other 476,783 - - - - 61,564 538,347 Total revenues 56,428,964 4,693,012 3,875,535 29,400 5,023,210 5,542,118 75,592,239 Expenditures
Current
General government 13,494,960 309,546 - - - 25,704 13,830,210 Community development 5,398,733 - - 29,400 - 2,311,432 7,739,565 Public works 3,038,080 3,129,795 939,776 - - 1,643,610 8,751,261 Public safety 23,341,265 - - - - - 23,341,265 Debt Service
Principal retirement 170,000 - 820,000 - - - 990,000 Interest and fiscal charges 161,699 - 240,799 - - - 402,498 Total expenditures 45,604,737 3,439,341 2,000,575 29,400 - 3,980,746 55,054,799 Excess/(deficiency) of revenues
over/(under) expenditures 10,824,227 1,253,671 1,874,960 - 5,023,210 1,561,372 20,537,440 Other financing sources (uses)
Transfers in 933,841 - 42,214 - - 414,115 1,390,170 Transfers out (1,349,180) - (44,788) - (132,816) (798,451) (2,325,235) Total other financing
sources (uses) (415,339) - (2,574) - (132,816) (384,336) (935,065) Net Changes in Fund Balances 10,408,888 1,253,671 1,872,386 - 4,890,394 1,177,036 19,602,375 Fund Balances, Beginning of Year 23,297,638 2,772,463 2,464,706 - 14,453,295 7,210,388 50,198,490 Fund Balances, End of Year 33,706,526 $ 4,026,134 $ 4,337,092 $ -$ 19,343,689 $ 8,387,424 $ 69,800,865 $ Capital
Special Revenue Funds Project Funds

S
ee Notes to Financial Statements 21
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities
Year Ended June 30, 2022
Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds 19,602,375$ Amounts reported for the governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the costs of these assets are allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense.

Capital expenditures 4,408,954$
Depreciation (3,666,807) 742,147
Revenues that are measurable but not available are not recorded as revenues in the governmental funds. 148,993
Bond proceeds provide current financial resources to governmental funds, but issuing debt increases long-term liabilities in the statement of net position. Repayment of principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces long-term liabilities in the statement of net position. Also, governmental funds report the effect of premiums when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities
Certificates of Participation - repayment and amortization of premium 1,118,788 Changes in compensated absences (146,692)
Interest and fiscal charges (42,706)
Change in net position of governmental activities 21,422,905$

See Notes to Financial Statements 22
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Statement of Fund Net Position
Proprietary Funds
June 30, 2022

Governmental
Activities
Internal Service
Funds
Assets
Current assets
Prepaid expenses 17,127 $
Total assets 17,127 $
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable 13,458 $
Due to other funds 3,669
Total liabilities 17,127 $

See Notes to Financial Statements 23
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position Proprietary Funds
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Governmental
Activities
Internal Service
Funds
Operating expenses
Contractual services 935,065 $
Operating loss (935,065)
Transfers
Transfers in 935,065
Change in Net Position -
Net Position, Beginning of Year -
Net Position, End of Year -$

S
ee Notes to Financial Statements 24
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Statement of Cash Flows
Proprietary Funds
Year Ended June 30, 2022
Governmental
Activities
Internal Service
Funds
Operating Activities
Cash payments to suppliers of goods and services (969,718)$ Net Cash Used for Operating Activities (969,718)
Financing Activities
Cash received from other funds 935,065
Interfund loans 3,669
Net Cash Provided by Noncapital Financing Activities 938,734 Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents (30,984)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 30,984
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year -$
Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash
used for operating activities
Operating loss (935,065)$
Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to
net cash used for operating activities
(Increase) in prepaid expenses (5,380)
(Decrease) in accounts payable (29,273)
Total adjustments (34,653)
Net Cash Used for Operating Activities (969,718)$

25 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting policies of the City of Jurupa Valley (the City) conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to governments. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles.

A) Reporting Entity

The City was incorporated July 1, 2011, under the general laws of the State of California. The City operates under the Council-Manager form of government. The City provides the following services as authorized by its general laws: public safety, public works, community development and general administrative services. The City has no component units for which it is financially accountable.

B) Basis of Presentation, Measurement Focus and Fin ancial Statement Presentation

The basic financial statements of the City are composed of the following:

• Government-wide financial statements
• Fund financial statements
• Notes to the basic financial statements

Government-wide financial statements display information about the reporting government as a whole, except for fiduciary activities. These statements include a single column for the governmental activities of the primary government. The City has no business-type or fiduciary activities. Eliminations have been made in the Statement of Activities so that certain allocated expenses are recorded only once (by the function to which they were allocated).

Government-wide financial statements are presented using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting . Under the economic resources measurement focus, all (both current and long-term) economic resources and obligations of the reporting government are reported in the government-wide financial statements. Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from exchange and exchange-like transactions are recognized when the exchange takes place.

Program revenues include charges for services, special assessments, and payments made by parties outside of the reporting government’s citizenry if that money is restricted to a particular program. Program revenues are netted with program expenses in the Statement of Activities, to present the net cost of each program.

Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets in the government-wide financial statements, rather than reported as an expenditure. Proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as a liability in the government-wide financial statements, rather than as another financing source. Amounts paid to reduce long- term indebtedness of the reporting government are reported as a reduction of the related liability, rather than as an expenditure.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

26 Fund Financial Statements

The underlying accounting system of the City is organized and operated on the basis of separate funds, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, fund balances, revenues and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Governmental resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled.

Fund financial statements for the primary government’s governmental, and proprietary funds are presented after the government-wide financial statements. These statements display information about major funds individually and non-major funds in the aggregate for governmental funds. Proprietary statements include financial information for proprietary funds. Proprietary funds of the City represent operating revenues and expenses from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund principal ongoing operation.

Governmental Funds

In the fund financial statements, governmental funds are presented using the modified-accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets.

Measurable means that the amounts can be estimated, or otherwise determined. Available means that the amounts were collected during the reporting period or soon enough thereafter to be available to finance the expenditures accrued for the reporting period. The City uses an availability period of 90 days except for property taxes, which is 60 days.

Sales taxes, property taxes (including those in lieu of motor vehicle license fee), franchise taxes, gas taxes, transient occupancy taxes, grants and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period to the extent normally collected within the availability period. Other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available where cash is received by the government.

Revenue recognition is subject to the measurable and availability criteria for the governmental funds in the fund financial statements. Exchange transactions are recognized as revenues in the period in which they are earned (i.e., the related goods or services are provided). Locally imposed derived tax revenues are recognized as revenues in the period in which the underlying exchange transaction upon which they are based takes place.

Imposed non-exchange transactions are recognized as revenues in the period for which they were imposed. If the period of use is not specified, they are recognized as revenues when an enforceable legal claim to the revenues arises or when they are received, whichever occurs first. Government-mandated and voluntary non- exchange transactions are recognized as revenues when all applicable eligibility requirements have been met.

In the fund financial statements, governmental funds are presented using the current financial resources measurement focus. This means that only current assets and current liabilities are generally included on their balance sheets. The reported fund balance (net current assets) is considered to be a measure of “available spendable resources.” Governmental fund operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Accordingly, they are said to present a summary of sources and uses of “available spendable resources” during a period.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

27 Because of their spending measurement focus, expenditure recognition for governmental fund types excludes amounts represented by non-current liabilities. Since they do not affect net current assets, such long-term amounts are not recognized as governmental fund type expenditures or fund liabilities. Amounts expended to acquire capital assets are recorded as expenditures in the year that resources were expended, rather than as fund assets. The proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as other financing sources rather than as a fund liability. Amounts paid to reduce long-term indebtedness are reported as fund expenditures.

Proprietary Funds

The City’s internal service funds are reported as proprietary funds. In the fund financial statements, the proprietary funds are presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when they are earned, and expenses are recognized when the related goods or services are delivered. In the fund financial statements, proprietary funds are presented using the economic resources measurement focus. This means that all assets and all liabilities (whether current or noncurrent) associated with their activity are included on their statements. Proprietary fund type operating statements present increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total net position.

Proprietary fund operating revenues, such as charges for services, result from exchange transactions associated with the principal activity of the fund. Exchange transactions are those in which each party receives and gives up essentially equal values. Non-operating revenues, such as subsidies, taxes, and investment earnings result from non-exchange transactions or ancillary activities. Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets in the proprietary fund financial statements, rather than reported as an expense. Proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as a liability in the proprietary fund financial statements, rather than as another financing source.

Amounts paid to reduce long-term indebtedness of the proprietary fund are reported as a reduction of the related liability, rather than as an expense.

C) Fund Classifications

The City reports the following major governmental funds:

General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund.

Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund – This fund accounts for revenue received for gasoline taxes under Sections 2105, 2106, 2107, 2107.5, and 2032(h)(2) of the Street and Highway Code to be used solely for transportation related purposes. Additionally, this fund accounts for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds which are made available for the Local Streets and Roads Funding Program, and shall be prioritized for expenditure on basic road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, and on critical safety projects. The fund has been elected as a major fund by the City.

Measure A Special Revenue Fund – This fund accounts for revenue received from the County of Riverside from a special ½% sales tax to be used for street maintenance and improvements only. In addition, this fund accounts for the related principal and interest payments for the 2016 COP’s. The fund has been elected as a major fund by the City.

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
2 8
ARPA Special Revenue Fund – This fund accounts for revenue received from U.S Department of Treasury from the local allocation for the American Rescue Plan Act to provide relief funds that have been negatively impacted from the coronavirus pandemic.

Developer Impact Fees Capital Project Fund – This fund accounts for the receipt of fees for development related activities such as infrastructure and public facilities.

The City’s fund structure also includes the following fund types:

Non-Major Special Revenue Funds – These funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes.

Non-Major Capital Project Funds – These funds account for financial resources used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities.

Internal Service Funds – These funds account for self-funded insurance and information services activities.

D) Cash and Investments
Investments are reported in the accompanying statement of net position at fair value. Changes in fair value that occur during a fiscal year are recognized as investment income reported for that fiscal year. Investment income includes interest earnings and changes in fair value. The City pools cash and investments of all funds. Each fund’s share in this pool is displayed in the accompanying financial statements as cash and investments. Investment income earned by the pooled investments is allocated to the various funds based on each fund’s average cash and investment balance, except for investment income associated with funds not legally required to receive pooled investment income which has been assigned to and recorded as revenue of the General Fund, as provided by California Government Code Section 53647. For purposes of the statement of cash flows of the proprietary fund types, cash and cash equivalents include all investments, as the City operates an internal cash pool that maintains the general characteristics of a demand deposit account.

E) Capital Assets
Capital assets (including infrastructure) are recorded at historical cost where historical records are available and at an estimated historical cost where no historical records exist. Contributed capital assets are valued at their acquisition value at the date of the contribution. Generally, capital asset purchases in excess of $5,000 are capitalized if they have an expected useful life of three years or more (one year for furniture and equipment, and five years for infrastructure). Right to use leased assets in excess of $50,000 are capitalized. Capital assets include public domain general capital assets (infrastructure) consisting of certain improvements including roads, streets, sidewalks, medians, and storm drains.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

29 Capital assets used in operations are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The City uses the straight-line method in the government-wide financial statements. Depreciation is charged as an expense against operations and accumulated depreciation is reported on the statement of net position. The range of lives used for depreciation purposes for each capital-asset class are as follows:

Useful Lives
Infrastructure 5-30 years
Buildings and improvements 10-30 years
Leasehold improvements 5-10 years
Land improvements 15 years
Furniture 5 years
Vehicles 7 years
Equipment 3 years
Capital Asset Class

F) Lease Receivable

Lease receivables are recorded by the City as the present value of future lease payments expected to be received from the lessee during the lease term, reduced by any provision for estimated uncollectible amounts.

Lease receivables are subsequently reduced over the life of the lease as cash is received in the applicable reporting period. The present value of future lease payments to be received are discounted based on the interest rate the City charges the lessee.

G) Fair Value Measurements

Certain assets and liabilities are required to be reported at fair value. The fair value framework provides a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies including:
• Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; • Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are inactive; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; • Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

These unobservable inputs reflect the City’s own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). These unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and may include the City’s own data.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

30 H) Property Taxes

Under California law, property taxes are assessed and collected by the counties up to 1% of assessed value, plus other increases approved by the voters. The property taxes go into a pool and are then allocated to the cities based on complex formulas and distributed by the County of Riverside.

Accordingly, the City accrues only those taxes that are received within 60 days after year-end. Property taxes are attached as a lien on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied on July 1 and are payable in two installments on December 10 and April 10.

I) Fund Equity

Fund balances are reported in the fund statements in the following classifications:

Nonspendable – Items that cannot be spent because they are either not spendable in form (such as prepaid or inventory) or items that are legally or contractually required to be maintained intact (such as endowments).

As of June 30, 2022, the city had prepaid expense of $13,391 in nonspendable fund balances.

Restricted - Items subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions. This includes externally imposed restrictions by creditors, such as through debt covenants, grantors, contributors, laws or regulations of other governments, as well as restrictions imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.

Committed - Items which are constrained by limitations that the government imposes upon itself at its highest level of decision-making. To be reported as committed, amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the government takes the same highest level action to remove or change the constraint. The City Council establishes (and modifies or rescinds) fund balance commitments by passage of a resolution. As of June 30, 2022, the City did not have committed fund balances.

Assigned - Amounts that are designated or expressed by the City Council, but does not require a formal action like a resolution. The City Council may delegate the authority, but such delegation of authority has not yet been granted to persons or bodies other than City Council. As of June 30, 2022, the City did not have assigned fund balances.

Unassigned - The excess remaining amounts in the General Fund and the residual deficit of all other governmental funds, which have not been restricted, committed, or assigned to specific purposes.

It is the City’s policy that restricted resources will be applied first, followed by (in order of application) committed, assigned, and unassigned resources, in the absence of a formal policy adopted by the Council.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

31 On April 1, 2021, the City Council also adopted a reserve policy to set aside funds into two designated reserves to address unforeseen emergencies or disasters and significant changes in the economic environment. These include the Catastrophic Reserve and Budget Stabilization Reserve.

The City commits to maintaining these reserves at a minimum of 25% of General Fund annual operating expenditures (minus one-time expenditures), divided between the Catastrophic Reserve (15%) and Budget Stabilization Reserve (10%). The Reserve Policy is reviewed by the City Council as part of the annual operating budget review and adoption process.

Key General Fund Designated Reserves

Catastrophic Reserve - Funds reserved under this category shall be used to mitigate costs associated with unforeseen emergencies, including natural disasters or catastrophic events. Should unforeseen and unavoidable events occur that require the expenditure of City resources beyond those provided for in the annual budget, the City Manager or designee shall have authority to approve Catastrophic Reserve appropriations. The City Manager or designee shall then present to the City Council a budget amendment confirming the nature of the emergency and authorizing the appropriation of reserve funds.

Budget Stabilization Reserve - Funds reserved under this category shall be used to mitigate, should they occur, annual budget revenue shortfalls (actual revenues less than projected revenues) due to changes in the economic environment and/or one-time expenditures that will result in future efficiencies and/or budgetary savings.

Replenishment of Unreserved Fund Balance

In keeping with the principles discussed in this Reserve Policy, when either fund is used, the City Council will develop a 1 to 5 year reserve replenishment plan to meet the minimum threshold of 25% of General Fund ongoing operating expenditures, excluding one-time expenditures.

Excess Fund Balance

At the end of each fiscal year, the Finance Department reports on the audited year-end budgetary fiscal results.

Should actual General Fund revenues exceed expenditures and encumbrances, a year-end operating surplus shall be reported. Any year-end surplus that results in the General Fund's fund balance exceeding the level required by the Reserve Policy shall be available for allocation for the following, subject to Council approval:
• Offset projected future deficits
• Anticipated intergovernmental fiscal impacts
• One-time funding, non-recurring needs

Upon funding of the above, any remaining surplus balances shall be divided equally between the Catastrophic Reserve and the Budget Stabilization Reserve.

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
3 2
J) Net Position
In the governmental-wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements, net position is classified as follows:

Net Investment in Capital Assets - This amount consists of capital assets net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by outstanding debt that is attributed to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of the assets, and related restricted investments.

Restricted Net Position - This amount is restricted by external creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments. As of June 30, 2022, $36,607,183 of net position is restricted by enabling legislation.

Unrestricted Net Position - This amount is all net position that do not meet the definition of “net investment in capital assets” or “restricted net position.”
Sometimes the City will fund outlays for a particular purpose from both restricted (e.g., restricted bond or grant proceeds) and unrestricted resources. In order to calculate the amounts to report as restricted – net position and unrestricted – net position in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, a flow assumption must be made about the order in which the resources are considered to be applied. It is the government’s policy to consider restricted – net position to have been depleted before unrestricted – net position is applied.

K) Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources
When applicable, the statement of net position and balance sheet will report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. Deferred outflows of resources represent outflows of resources (consumption of net position) that apply to future periods and therefore, are not recognized as an expense or expenditure until that time.

When applicable, the statement of net position and the balance sheet will report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. Deferred inflows of resources represent an acquisition of net assets that applies to a future period. The City has two items that qualifies for reporting in this category. The governmental funds report unavailable revenues for certain revenue sources not received during the availability period. The other item is deferred inflows related to leases where the City is the lessor and is reported in the governmental funds balance sheet and statement of net position. The deferred inflows of resources related to leases are recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) on the straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

L) Compensated Absences
It is the City’s policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation (compensated absences).

For governmental activities, this accumulation is recorded as an expense and liability in the fiscal year earned.

For the governmental funds, the amount of accumulated unpaid vacation, which is payable from available resources, is recorded as liability of the fund when it has matured (i.e., when due and payable).

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
3 3
M) Use of Estimates
The preparation of basic financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense/expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

N) New Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year
GASB Statement No. 87 – As of July 1, 2021, the City adopted GASB Statement No. 87, Leases. The implementation of this standard establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. The standard requires recognition of certain right to use leased assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract.

The standard also requires lessors to recognize a lease receivable and deferred inflow of resources. As a result of implementing this standard, the City recognized a lease receivable and deferred inflow of resources in the amount of $1,002,877 and $1,002,877 as of July 1, 2021, within both the general fund and non-major governmental fund, as well as the government wide governmental activities. As a result of these adjustments there was no effect on beginning net position or fund balance. The additional disclosures required by this standard are included in Note 12.

Future GASB Pronouncements
The City is currently evaluating the potential impact of the following issued, but not yet effective accounting statements:

GASB Statement No. 91 – In May 2019, GASB issued Statement No. 91, Conduit Debt Obligations. The objective of this Statement is to provide a single method of reporting conduit debt obligations by issues and eliminate diversity in practice. The Statement is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021.

GASB Statement No. 94 – In March 2020, GASB issued Statement No. 94, Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships and Availability Payment Arrangements. The objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by addressing issues related to public-private and public-public partnership arrangements (PPPs). The Statement is effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022.

GASB Statement No. 96 – In May 2020, the GASB issued Statement No. 96, Subscription-based Information Technology Arrangements. The objective of this Statement is to provide guidance on the accounting and financial reporting for subscription-based information technology arrangements (SBITAs) for government end users (governments). The Statement is effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022.

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
3 4
GASB Statement No. 99 – In April 2022, GASB issued Statement No. 99, Omnibus 2022. This Statement will enhance comparability in accounting and financial reporting and improve the consistency of authoritative literature by addressing practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements and accounting and financial reporting for financial guarantees. The requirements related to leases, PPPs, and SBITAs are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2022, and all reporting periods thereafter. The requirements related to financial guarantees and the classification and reporting of derivative instruments within the scope of Statement 53 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023, and all reporting periods thereafter.

GASB Statement No. 100 – In June 2022, GASB issued Statement No. 100, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. This Statement defines accounting changes as changes in accounting principles, changes in accounting estimates, and changes to or within the financial reporting entity and describes the transactions or other events that constitute those changes. The requirements of this Statement are effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023, and all reporting periods thereafter.

GASB Statement No. 101 – In June 2022, GASB issued Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences. This Statement requires that liabilities for compensated absences be recognized for leave that has not been used and leave that has been used but not yet paid in cash or settled through noncash means. The requirements of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and all reporting periods thereafter.

Note 2 - Cash and Investments
Cash and investments as of June 30, 2022, are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows:

Statement of Net Position
Cash and investments 100,902,330$
Cash and investments - restricted 798,492
Total cash and investments 101,700,822$
C
ash and investments as of June 30, 2022, consist of the following:

Cash on hand (petty cash) 934$
Deposits with financial institutions 38,413,087
Investments 62,488,309
Restricted - money market funds 798,492
Total cash and investments 101,700,822$

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

35 Investments Authorized by the California Government Code and the City’s Investment Policy

The following table identifies the investment types that are authorized for the City by the California Government Code or the City’s Investment Policy, where more restrictive. The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code or the City’s Investment Policy, where more restrictive, that address interest rate risk and concentration of credit risk. For bond proceeds or restricted cash and investments, the trustee holds money market mutual funds in accordance with the provision of the debt agreements of the City, rather than the general provisions of California Government Code or the City’s Investment Policy.

Maximum Maximum
Investment Types **Maximum Percentage Investment
Authorized by State Law Maturity of Portfolio In One Issuer U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years 10% None
U.S. Agency Securities 5 years 50% 50%
Medium-Term Notes 5 years 30% None
Bankers' Acceptances 180 days 40% 30%
Commercial Paper 270 days 15% 10%
Asset Backed Securities 5 years 20% None
Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30% None
Money Market Funds 5 years 20% 10%
Local Agency Investment Fund None $75,000,000 None
Supranationals Securities 5 years 30% 10%
** No more than 1/3 in excess of 2 years to maturity.

Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the City’s investments to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the City’s investments by maturity:

Remaining Maturity
(in Months)
Investment Type Totals 12 Months or Less
Local agency investment fund $ 62,488,309 $ 62,488,309 Held by bond trustee:

Money market funds 798,492 798,492 Total $ 63,286,801 $ 63,286,801

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

36 Disclosures Relating to Credit Risk

Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating required by (where applicable) the California Government Code, the City’s Investment Policy, or debt agreements, and the Standard and Poor’s actual rating as of year-end for each investment type:

Minimum
Legal Not
Investment Type Totals Rating AAA Rated
Local agency investment fund $ 62,488,309 N/A $ - $ 62,488,309 Held by bond trustee
Money market funds 798,492 AAA 798,492 - Total $ 63,286,801 $ 798,492 $ 62,488,309 Rating as of Year End

Custodial Credit Risk

Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker-dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the City’s investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits or investments, other than the following provision for deposits:

The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits. Of the City’s deposits with financial institutions, $41,522,474 was in excess of federal depository insurance limits. This amount is collateralized pursuant to California Government Code.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

37 Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements are categorized based on valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset.

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs, including matrix pricing models; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs.

Investments in LAIF are uncategorized as deposits and withdrawals are made on the basis of $1 and not fair value. Money market mutual funds are valued at net asset value $1 dollar per share (amortized cost) and as such are uncategorized in the fair value hierarchy. Balances as of June 30, 2022 are as follows:

Fair Value
Uncategorized Investments
Local agency investment fund 62,488,309 $
Held by bond trustee
Money market funds (amortized cost) 798,492
Total investment portfolio 63,286,801 $

Investment in State Investment Pool

The City is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by the California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the City’s investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements at an amount based upon the City’s pro-rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance is available for withdrawal on demand based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. LAIF is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not rated.

Note 3 - Interfund Transactions

Interfund transfers for the year ended June 30, 2022, are as follows:

Non-Major
Developer Governmental
General Fund Measure A Impact Fees Funds Total
Transfers In
General Fund -$ 44,788 $ 132,816 $ 756,237 $ 933,841 $ Measure A - - - 42,214 42,214 Non-major governmental funds 414,115 414,115 Internal Service Funds 935,065 - - - 935,065 Total 1,349,180 $ 44,788 $ 132,816 $ 798,451 $ 2,325,235 $ Transfers out

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

38 Interfund transfers from the General fund to the non-major governmental funds of $414,115 was for costs not covered by fund revenues. Transfers from General fund to Internal Service funds of $935,065 were to close out the Internal Services funds at year-end.

The interfund transfer from Measure A to the General fund of $44,788 were to cover administrative expenses.

The interfund transfer from the Developer Impact Fees fund of $132,816 to the General fund, were to reimburse the General fund for contributions to various capital projects.

The interfund transfers from non-major governmental funds to the General fund totaled $756,237. Of this amount, $282,352 were to reimburse the General Fund for expenditures related to the Jurupa Valley Operations Center (JVOC) building from the 2021 Building Acquisition Project COPs fund. The remining amounts were for costs covered by grants for safety in the amount of $265,290, costs covered by CalRecycle grants of $124,696 and administrative expense recognition for Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District Fund and Community Facilities District Fund of $20,817 and $63,082, respectively.

The interfund transfers from non-major governmental funds of $42,214 were for reimbursements from the CalRecycle fund to Gas Tax and Measure A funds for capital project expenditures for the Market Street Bridge Project.

Due From/Due to Other Funds

The composition of interfund balances at June 30, 2022 are as follows:

Due to Other Funds General
Non-Major governmental funds 1,045,389 $
Internal service fund 3,669
Total 1,049,058 $
Due From
Other Funds

The interfund balances reflected above represent short-term borrowings of cash pending receipt of reimbursements.

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
3 9
Note 4 - Capital Assets
Capital asset activity for the year ended June 30, 2022, was as follows:

Beginning Balance Ending Balance
Governmental Activities July 01, 2021 Additions Deletions June 30, 2022 Capital assets not being depreciated
Land 2,397,510$ -$ -$ 2,397,510$
Construction in progress 4,980,293 4,112,064 (3,680,874) 5,411,483 Total capital assets not
being depreciated 7,377,803 4,112,064 (3,680,874) 7,808,993 Capital assets being depreciated
Infrastructure 63,786,453 3,680,874 - 67,467,327
Buildings and improvements 9,761,759 52,126 - 9,813,885 Leasehold improvements 506,187 - - 506,187
Furniture and equipment 197,793 156,207 - 354,000
Land improvements 59,363 - - 59,363
Vehicles 710,354 88,557 - 798,911
Total capital assets
being depreciated 75,021,909 3,977,764 - 78,999,673
Less accumulated depreciation for
Infrastructure (27,924,753) (3,282,367) - (31,207,120) Buildings and improvements (358,134) (203,445) - (561,579) Leasehold improvements (163,016) (25,309) - (188,325) Furniture and equipment (111,126) (43,923) - (155,049) Land improvements (17,903) (3,958) - (21,861)
Vehicles (433,710) (107,805) - (541,515)
Total accumulated
depreciation (29,008,642) (3,666,807) - (32,675,449)
Total capital assets being
depreciated, net 46,013,267 310,957 - 46,324,224
Total capital assets net
of accumulated
depreciation 53,391,070$ 4,423,021$ (3,680,874)$ 54,133,217$ C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
4 0
Depreciation expense in the amount of $3,666,807 was charged to the following governmental activities:

Governmental Activities
General Government 276,635$
Community Development 107,805
Public Works 3,282,367
Total 3,666,807$
C
onstruction Commitments
The City had active construction projects as of June 30, 2022. The following table identifies the largest remaining commitments on projects as of June 30, 2022:

Contract Amount Remaining
Bain Street Pavement Rehab 614,938$ $ 33,000
Mission Blvd Pvmt Rehab PH. 1 20103 1,488,488 70,162
Pacific Ave St Imprv Mission-SR 60 20107 565,000 22,290 Mission Blvd. Pvmt Rehab Ph.2 21103 1,681,477 1,681,477 Old Mira Loma Pavemnt Rehab PH.1 - 21102 810,000 41,903 Total 5,159,903$ 1,848,831$
N
ote 5 - Risk Management
The City is a member of the Public Entity Risk Management Authority (“PERMA”), a joint powers insurance authority formed under Section 990 of the California Government Code for the purpose of jointly funding programs of insurance coverage for its members. PERMA is comprised of thirty participating agencies, twenty cities, four transit agencies and six special districts. The City participates in the liability, property, auto physical damage, crime, cyber liability, and deadly weapon response insurance programs of PERMA.

The liability program provides coverage up to $50 million per occurrence for personal injury, bodily injury, property damage and public officials’ errors and omissions. The City has selected a $0 self-insured retention for this coverage and participates in risk sharing pools for losses up to $1 million, followed by PERMA’s membership in the CSAC Excess Insurance Authority (“EIA”) for $49 million of excess liability coverage. The property insurance program is group purchased under a master property insurance policy with accumulated values from all participants effecting lower rates and broader coverage for members. The program covers real property, business personal property, inland mariner coverage for special mobile equipment and business interruption.

Commercial property coverage is written on a replacement cost basis and all risk, eliminating the traditional commercial “named peril” policy. Property coverage is limited to $50 million ($2.5 million for flood), with deductibles of $10,000 per occurrence except $100,000 for flood and 24 hour service interruption.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

41 The auto physical damage insurance program is also group purchased under a master insurance policy with accumulated values from all participants effecting lower rates for members. Auto physical damage coverage is provided up to $100 million, with self-insured retention limits of $5,000 for all vehicles. The crime insurance program provides public employee dishonesty, forgery or alteration, and computer fraud coverage under a master insurance policy up to $3 million, with a $2,500 deductible per occurrence. For cyber liability, the City is covered up to $2 million, with a $5,000 deductible per claim. For deadly weapon response program liability, the City is covered up to $500,000, with a $10,000 deductible per each event. The City is insured with the State Compensation Insurance Fund for workers’ compensation claims. There is no deductible requirement for this coverage. During the past three fiscal years, none of the above programs of protection have experienced settlements or judgments that exceeded pooled or insured coverage. There were also no significant reductions in pooled or insured liability coverage in 2021-2022. The amount of insurance premiums paid in 2021-2022 was $591,743.

Note 6 - Contingencies

Various claims and suits have been filed against the City in the normal course of business. Although the outcome of these matters is not presently determinable in the opinion of legal counsel, the resolutions of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the City.

Note 7 - Revenue Neutrality Payment Commitments

As part of the formation of the City, the County of Riverside (“County”) and City entered into a revenue neutrality agreement to be paid to the County annually. Upon reaching property and sales taxes of at least $19,030,000 the City is required to pay a percentage of such property and sales taxes to the County at escalating rates in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

During the fiscal year-ended June 30, 2015, the Governor signed SB 107 to provide a one-time funding to the County in exchange for the County retiring approximately $21 million in first year service cost reimbursements, deferred revenue neutrality payments and deferred sheriff payments, which included a portion of the amounts above. Under the Revenue Neutrality Agreement, the City shall continue to pay the County each year a portion of its tax revenues as follows:

Property and Sales
Taxes in excess of Percentage
$ 15,840,000 16% of total
16,880,000 21% of total
17,940,000 22% of total
19,030,000 24% of total

Per section 3.1.9 of the agreement, the City shall pay the County the total annual amount owed no later than 60 days following the end of the City’s fiscal year. At June 30, 2022, $7,828,035 is recorded as the estimated amounts due for FY 2021-22 under the agreement and is reported as part of the due to other governments balance on the financial statements.

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
4 2
Note 8 - Long Term Liabilities
The following is a summary of long-term liabilities of the City for the year ended June 30, 2022:

Beginning Balance Ending Balance Due within
July 01, 2021 Additions Deletions June 30, 2022 one year Certificates of participation
Series 2016 5,445,000$ -$ (820,000)$ 4,625,000$ 855,000$ Series 2021 6,935,000 - (170,000) 6,765,000 140,000
Plus deferred amount
for issuance premium 700,898 - (128,788) 572,110 -
Total certificates
of participation 13,080,898 - (1,118,788) 11,962,110 995,000 Compensated absences 201,063 184,118 (37,426) 347,755 309,768 Total 13,281,961$ 184,118$ (1,156,214)$ 12,309,865$ 1,304,768$ C
ertificates of Participation Series 2016
In October 2016, pursuant to an Installment Sales Agreement (Agreement) between the City and the California Municipal Finance Authority (Authority) for the Local Measure A Sales Tax Revenue (Installment Sale) Certificate of Participation, Series 2016 (Jurupa Valley Pavement Rehabilitation Project), the Authority issued $8,165,000 of Certificates of Participation Series 2016, the proceeds of which were used to (i) finance the design, acquisition, and construction of certain local roadway improvements and street resurfacing projects within the jurisdiction of the City, (ii) fund a reserve fund for the Certificates, and (iii) pay the costs incurred in connection with the execution, sale, and delivery of the Certificates.

Measure A revenues are pledged as the sole source of repayment and totaled $3,897,841 for the year ended June 30, 2022. Payments remitted by the City to the Authority will in turn be remitted to owners of the Certificates of Participation, with principal amounts due annually each June 1, commencing June 1, 2017. The Certificates bear interest rates of 2 percent to 5 percent, and interest is payable semi-annually on December 1 and June 1, beginning on December 1, 2016.

The Certificates maturing on June 1, 2027 are subject to optional prepayment prior to maturity after June 1, 2026.

The Certificates are subject to mandatory prepayment prior to maturity, in whole or in part, on any date, from amounts received upon the acceleration of installment sale payments upon the occurrence of any event of default under the 2016 Agreement, at a prepayment price equal to the principal amount to be prepaid, plus accrued interest to the date fixed for prepayment, without premium.

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
4 3
The annual debt service requirements on these bonds are as follows:

Principal Interest
2023 855,000$ 205,000$
2024 885,000 170,800
2025 915,000 144,250
2026 960,000 98,500
2027 1,010,000 50,500
Total 4,625,000$ 669,050$
Year Ending June 30,
T
he City is required to maintain a Reserve Fund in the amount equal to the least of: 10% of the initial stated principal amount of the Certificates of Participation, Series 2016, 125% of the average annual installment sales payments, or the maximum annual debt service. The City has satisfied the reserve requirement through purchase of a surety bond, as allowed by the debt agreement.

Certificates of Participation Series 2021 Building Acquisition Project In June 2021, pursuant to a lease-leaseback agreement (the Lease) between the City and the Public Property Financing Corporation of California (the Corporation) for the Eddie Dee Smith Senior Center and Jurupa Valley City Hall buildings, the Corporation issued $6,935,000 of Certificates of Participation (2021 Building Acquisition Project), the proceeds of which were used to (a) finance part of the cost of purchasing and renovating an existing building (Fleet Services Building on Riverview Drive) from the County of Riverside to be used by the City as the City’s first corporation yard and operations facility for the Public Works Department, and (b) pay delivery costs incurred in connection with the execution, delivery and sale of the Certificates. The building purchase was paid with $4,000,000 of general fund reserves, and the balance was paid using proceeds from issuance of the Certificates. The amounts for leased assets included in capital assets are $65,000 of land and $1,420,331 in building and improvements ($1,711,127 net of accumulated depreciation of $290,796).

General fund revenues are the sole source of repayment. Payments remitted by the City to the Authority are made in accordance with the debt service repayment schedule under the Lease with principal payments due annually each March 15, commencing March 15, 2021, and corresponding interest payable semi-annually on September 15 and March 15, beginning September 15, 2021. These payments remitted to the Authority will in turn be remitted to owners of the Certificates of Participation, with principal amounts due annually each April 1, commencing on April 1, 2022. The Certificates bear interest rates of 2.25 percent to 5 percent, and interest is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1, beginning on October 1, 2021.

The Certificates maturing on or before April 1, 2028 are not subject to optional redemption. Certificates maturing on and after April 1, 2029, are subject to redemption prior to their respective stated maturity dates, at the option of the City, from the proceeds of optional prepayments of Lease Payments made by the City pursuant to the Lease Agreement, in whole or in part, on any date on after April 1, 2028, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, together with the premium set forth below, from the proceeds of the optional prepayment of Lease Payments made by the City pursuant to the Lease.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

44 Redemption Period Redemption Premium:

April 1, 2028 through March 31, 2029 3%
April 1, 2029 through March 31, 2030 2%
April 1, 2030 through March 31, 2031 1%
April 1, 2031 and thereafter 0%

The Certificates are subject to mandatory prepayment prior to maturity, in whole or in part, from the principal components of scheduled Lease Payments required to be paid by the City pursuant to the Lease Agreement with respect to each such redemption date (subject to abatement, as set forth in the Lease Agreement), at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium, for each of the periods indicated as follows:

Principal Amount
of Certificates
June 1 to be Redeemed
2040 250,000 $
2041* 255,000
2042 260,000
2043* 270,000
2044 275,000
2045* 280,000
2046 290,000
2047 295,000
2048* 300,000
2049 310,000
2050 320,000
2051* 325,000
*Maturity

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

45 The annual debt service requirements on these bonds, and annual lease payments to the Corporations on these certificates are as follows:

April 1* Principal Interest
2023 140,000 $ 195,038 $
2024 145,000 188,038
2025 155,000 180,788
2026 160,000 173,038
2027 170,000 165,038
2028-2032 960,000 707,788
2033-2037 1,120,000 548,838
2038-2042 1,250,000 414,181
2043-2047 1,410,000 262,175
2048-2051 1,255,000 79,497
Total 6,765,000 $ 2,914,416 $
*The annual lease payments to the Corporations on these certificates are due on March 15th of each year.

Compensated Absences

The City’s liability for accrued and unpaid compensated absences in the governmental activities totaled $347,755 at June 30, 2022. The compensated absences are liquidated through the General Fund.

Note 9 - Accumulated Fund Deficits

The following individual funds reported deficit fund balances as of June 30, 2022:

Deficit
Balance
Non-Major Funds
Community Development Block Grant 97,032 $
TUMF Grant 47,623
ATP Grant 106,115

The City plans to eliminate the deficits in each fund with intergovernmental receivables to be collected in future periods.

City of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022

46 Note 10 - Fund Balances

The following table summarizes the fund balance of the governmental funds as of June 30, 2022:

Developer Non-Major
General Gas Tax Measure A Impact Fees Funds Totals
Nonspendable
Prepaid expense 13,391 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,391 $ Restricted
Community - - - - 5,931,691 5,931,691 development
Public works - 4,026,134 4,337,092 19,343,689 2,706,503 30,413,418 Total restricted - 4,026,134 4,337,092 19,343,689 8,638,194 36,345,109 Unassigned 33,693,135 - - - (250,770) 33,442,365 Total fund balance 33,706,526 $ 4,026,134 $ 4,337,092 $ 19,343,689 $ 8,387,424 $ 69,800,865 $ Major Governmental Funds

The $4.03 million restricted fund balance in the Gas Tax fund is restricted for RMRA projects only. Of the general fund unassigned balance, $8.21 million represents developer contributions collected through June 30, 2022.

Note 11 - Excess of Expenditures over Appropriations

Expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2022, exceed appropriations in the following funds:

Final Excess Over
Budget Actual Appropriations
Major Funds
ARPA Fund -$ 29,400 $ (29,400)$ Non-Major Funds
COPS Fund 253,821 $ 265,290 $ (11,469)$ CalRecycle - 171,528 (171,528)

C
ity of Jurupa Valley, California
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2022
4 7
Note 12 - Leases
The City has accrued a receivable for two leases – billboard and cell tower. The remaining receivable for these leases was $1,480,297 for the year ended June 30, 2022. Deferred inflows related to these leases were $1,454,212 as of June 30, 2022. Interest revenue recognized on these leases was $18,715 for the year ended June 30, 2022. Principal receipts of $41,314 were recognized during the fiscal year. The interest rate on the leases was 1.5 %. Final receipt is expected in fiscal year 2042.

The billboard lease agreement call for payments that are partially variable and therefore were not included in lease receivable or deferred inflow of resources for leases. These variable payments are a result of the underlying lease measured not on a fixed rate, but rather variable due to the underlying payments derived from 25 percent of gross advertising revenue for the Digital Display. No variable payments were received or recognized as revenue for the year ended June 30, 2022.

The future payments on these leases are as follows:

Principal Interest
2023 47,148$ 21,882$
2024 49,432 21,159
2025 51,813 20,402
2026 54,296 19,608
2027 56,885 18,775
2028 - 2032 327,252 79,948
2033 - 2037 410,482 52,440
2038 - 2042 482,989 18,126
1,480,297$ 252,340$
Years Ending June 30,

Required Supplementary Information
June 30, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley, California

See Note to Required Supplementary Information 48
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual General Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Final Budget -
Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Taxes 40,472,560 $ 44,194,872 $ 46,207,899 $ 2,013,027 $ Licenses, fees and permits 1,872,896 1,780,846 2,353,249 572,403 Intergovernmental 62,000 208,126 594,601 386,475 Charges for services 4,074,483 3,500,889 4,060,345 559,456 Fines and forfeitures 490,000 484,233 626,384 142,151 Developer contributions - 2,927,780 2,498,780 (429,000) Investment income (loss) 200,000 104,396 (389,077) (493,473) Other 577,500 447,753 476,783 29,030 Total revenues 47,749,439 53,648,895 56,428,964 2,780,069 Expenditures
General government 12,698,015 13,200,376 13,494,960 (294,584) Community development 4,526,349 5,271,091 5,398,733 (127,642) Public works 9,112,295 7,436,323 3,038,080 4,398,243 Public safety 24,492,658 24,191,730 23,341,265 850,465 Debt Service
Principal retirement - 170,000 170,000 - Interest and fiscal charges 350,000 150,258 161,699 (11,441) Total expenditures 51,179,317 50,419,778 45,604,737 4,815,041 Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over
(under) expenditures (3,429,878) 3,229,117 10,824,227 7,595,110 Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in 253,821 514,683 933,841 419,158 Transfers out (637,809) (637,809) (1,349,180) (711,371) Total other financing
sources (uses) (383,988) (123,126) (415,339) (292,213) Net Change in Fund Balance (3,813,866) 3,105,991 10,408,888 7,302,897 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 23,297,638 23,297,638 23,297,638 - Fund Balance, End of Year 19,483,772 $ 26,403,629 $ 33,706,526 $ 7,302,897 $ Budgeted Amounts

S
ee Note to Required Supplementary Information 49
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Gas Tax Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022
Variance with
Final Budget -
Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 4,884,804$ 5,063,573$ 4,714,799$ (348,774)$ Investment income (loss) 15,000 15,000 (21,787) (36,787) Total revenues 4,899,804 5,078,573 4,693,012 (385,561) Expenditures
General government 274,605 274,605 309,546 (34,941)
Public works 6,626,329 6,626,329 3,129,795 3,496,534 Total expenditures 6,900,934 6,900,934 3,439,341 3,461,593 Excess (deficiency) of
revenues (2,001,130) (1,822,361) 1,253,671 3,076,032 Net Change in Fund Balance (2,001,130) (1,822,361) 1,253,671 3,076,032 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2,772,463 2,772,463 2,772,463 - Fund Balance, End of Year 771,333$ 950,102$ 4,026,134$ 3,076,032$ Budgeted Amounts

See Note to Required Supplementary Information 50
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Measure A Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 2,317,000 $ 3,897,841 $ 1,580,841 $ Investment income (loss) 13,000 (22,306) (35,306) Total revenues 2,330,000 3,875,535 1,545,535 Expenditures
Public works 2,988,302 939,776 2,048,526 Debt Service
Principal retirement 1,057,800 820,000 237,800 Interest and fiscal charges - 240,799 (240,799) Total expenditures 4,046,102 2,000,575 2,040,223 Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over
(under) expenditures (1,716,102) 1,874,960 3,591,062 Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in - 42,214 42,214 Transfers out (105,013) (44,788) 60,225 Total other financing
sources (uses) (105,013) (2,574) 102,439 Net Change in Fund Balance (1,821,115) 1,872,386 3,688,197 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2,464,706 2,464,706 - Fund Balance, End of Year 643,591 $ 4,337,092 $ 3,693,501 $

See Note to Required Supplementary Information 51
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental -$ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ Total Revenues - 29,400 - Expenditures
Current
Community development - 29,400 (29,400) Total expenditures - 29,400 (29,400) Fund Balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year -$ -$ -$

52 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Note to the Required Supplementary Information
June 30, 2022

Budgetary Accounting

The City Manager shall prepare and submit the proposed annual budget to the City Council for its approval for the General Fund, Gas Tax fund, Measure A funds, and other restricted revenues, which includes AQMD, CDBG, COPS, ATP Grant, EMP Grant, Community Facilities Districts, and Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts funds. The agenda for the budget workshops and budget meetings are noted in accordance with the Brown Act.

After reviewing the same and making such revisions as it may deem advisable and public input, the budget is then adopted annually by the Council at a regularly held meeting. The budget is adopted prior to the beginning of the fiscal year and serves as the foundation for the City’s financial plan.

The level of budgetary control (the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established at the fund level. Transfers of appropriations between department budgets can be made with the City Manager/Director of Administrative Services approval. City Council’s approval is required for all budget amendments that result in a change to the adopted budget of the fund.

Budgets are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.

Appropriations lapse at the end of the fiscal year unless they are re-appropriated through the formal budget process. Open encumbrances will be paid by subsequent year’s budget appropriations. Encumbrances do not constitute expenditures or liabilities of the City.

Budgeted amounts are as originally adopted, or as amended in accordance with prescribed procedures throughout the fiscal year.

The following funds had expenditures in excess of appropriations for the year ended June 30, 2022:

Final Excess Over
Budget Actual Appropriations
Major Funds
ARPA Fund -$ 29,400 $ (29,400)$ Non-Major Funds
COPS Fund 253,821 $ 265,290 $ (11,469)$ CalRecycle - 171,528 (171,528)

The following funds do not have a legally adopted budget for the year ended June 30, 2022:

• Surface Transportation Grant Special Revenue Fund
• All Capital Project Funds

Supplementary Information
June 30, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley, California
5 3
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
N
on-Major Special Revenue Funds
Air Quality Improvement District (AQMD) Fund
To account for the City’s share of vehicle registration fees that the State of California has allocated to address air quality concerns in Southern California. These monies are to be used in air quality maintenance programs locally and/or regionally.

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund
To account for receipt and disbursement of the CDBG Program of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Program including CDBG-CV (Coronavirus) funding. Accountability follows the guidelines under Uniform Guidance.

COPS Fund
To account for revenue received from the State of California for front line public safety purposes.

Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Grant Fund To account for revenues and expenditures associated with the TUMF Program’s agreement to reimburse a portion of the improvements to Limonite Avenue.

Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Grant Fund
To account for revenues and expenditures related to alternative transportation capital projects, specifically sidewalks on Troth Street and Pyrite Street that are partially funded by the State of California ATP grant.

CalRecycle Grant Fund
To account for revenues and expenditures associated with the various CalRecycle Grants received from the State of California for use by local governments. The City was granted funds to construct pavement projects using rubberized pavement, to assist in the removal and disposal of materials illegally dumped in the public right of way, to enhance public outreach and education, and to incorporate preventative security measures.

Community Facilities District (CFD) Fund
To account for the revenues and expenditures associated with a geographic area where a special property tax on real estate (a parcel tax) is assessed for the services within the district. The City currently has ten CFDs: CFD 13- 001 Bellegrave, CFD 14-001 Harvest, CFD 14-002 Mission Estates, CFD 14-003 Granite Ridge, CFD 15-001 Riverbend, CFD 15-002 Skypark, CFD 16-001 Quarry, CFD 15-003 Vista Rio, CFD 20-001 Shadow Rock, and CFD 18-002 Tract 36702 (Stone).
5 4
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
L
andscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD) Fund To account for the revenues and expenditures associated with a geographic area where a special assessment on real estate is assessed for the services within the district. Beginning in fiscal year 2015-2016, the City assumed responsibility for the administration of the districts, which includes managing the required services to be provided within the LLMDs.

Surface Transportation Grant Fund
To account for the monies received for the Surface Transportation Grant monies. These funds may be used for local street and road expenditures.

Non-Major Capital Project Funds
Measure A COP Series 2016
This fund is used to account for the construction of all capital projects that utilize the resources from the Certificate of Participation Series 2016.
2021 Building Acquisition Project COP’s
This fund is used to account for the construction of all capital projects that utilize the resources from the Certificate of Participation Series 2021.

Road and Bridge Benefit District
To account for the receipt of fees for development related activities such as road & bridge projects.

55 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
June 30, 2022

AQMD CDBG COPS
Assets
Cash and investments 504,419 $ -$ -$ Intergovernmental receivable 35,553 499,922 - Due from other governments - - 108,089 Deposits receivable - - - Interest receivable 611 - - Lease Receivable - - - Cash and investments - restricted - - - Total assets 540,583 $ 499,922 $ 108,089 $ Liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balances
Liabilities
Accounts payable -$ 150,590 $ -$ Due to other funds - 446,364 - Deposits payable - - - Total liabilities - 596,954 - Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue - - 108,089 Leases - - - Total deferred inflows
of resources - - 108,089 Fund balances
Restricted for
Community development 540,583 - - Public works - - - Unassigned - (97,032) - Total fund balances 540,583 (97,032) - Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources
and fund balances 540,583 $ 499,922 $ 108,089 $ Special Revenue Funds

56 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
June 30, 2022

Assets
Cash and investments
Intergovernmental receivable
Due from other governments
Deposits receivable
Interest receivable
Lease Receivable
Cash and investments - restricted
Total assets
Liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balances
Liabilities
Accounts payable
Due to other funds
Deposits payable
Total liabilities
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue
Leases
Total deferred inflows
of resources
Fund balances
Restricted for
Community development
Public works
Unassigned
Total fund balances
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources
and fund balances
TUMF ATP CalRecycle
Grant Grant Grant
-$ -$ 235,975 $ 151,431 49,028 -
- - - - - - - - 283 - - - - - - 151,431 $ 49,028 $ 236,258 $
37,399 $ 37,125 $ 4,618 $
161,655 118,018 -
- - - 199,054 155,143 4,618
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 231,640 (47,623) (106,115) -
(47,623) (106,115) 231,640
151,431 $ 49,028 $ 236,258 $
Special Revenue Funds

57 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
June 30, 2022

Assets
Cash and investments
Intergovernmental receivable
Due from other governments
Deposits receivable
Interest receivable
Lease Receivable
Cash and investments - restricted
Total assets
Liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balances
Liabilities
Accounts payable
Due to other funds
Deposits payable
Total liabilities
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue
Leases
Total deferred inflows
of resources
Fund balances
Restricted for
Community development
Public works
Unassigned
Total fund balances
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources
and fund balances
Community Landscape & Surface
Facilities Lighting Maint. Transportation
District Districts Grant
4,240,597 $ 1,385,671 $ -$
29,944 22,570 -
- - - 70,887 - 37,000 5,266 1,240 -
- 978,966 -
- - - 4,346,694 $ 2,388,447 $ 37,000 $
153,103 $ 152,396 $ -$
- - 37,000 54,256 29,347 -
207,359 181,743 37,000
- - - - 954,931 -
- 954,931 -
4,139,335 1,251,773 -
- - - - - - 4,139,335 1,251,773 -
4,346,694 $ 2,388,447 $ 37,000 $
Special Revenue Funds

58 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
June 30, 2022

Assets
Cash and investments
Intergovernmental receivable
Due from other governments
Deposits receivable
Interest receivable
Lease Receivable
Cash and investments - restricted
Total assets
Liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and fund balances
Liabilities
Accounts payable
Due to other funds
Deposits payable
Total liabilities
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue
Leases
Total deferred inflows
of resources
Fund balances
Restricted for
Community development
Public works
Unassigned
Total fund balances
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources
and fund balances
Measure A 2021 Building Road and
COP Acquisition Bridge
Series 2016 Project COPs Benefit District Totals
-$ -$ 1,956,236 $ 8,322,898 $ - - - 788,448 - - - 108,089 - - - 107,887 - - 2,487 9,887 - - - 978,966 3,282 795,210 - 798,492 3,282 $ 795,210 $ 1,958,723 $ 11,114,667 $ -$ -$ -$ 535,231 $ - 282,352 - 1,045,389 - - - 83,603 - 282,352 - 1,664,223 - - - 108,089 - - - 954,931 - - - 1,063,020 - - 5,931,691 3,282 512,858 1,958,723 2,706,503 - - - (250,770) 3,282 512,858 1,958,723 8,387,424 3,282 $ 795,210 $ 1,958,723 $ 11,114,667 $ Capital Project Funds

59 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended June 30, 2022

AQMD CDBG COPS
Revenues
Intergovernmental 139,699 $ 2,165,189 $ 265,290 $ Assessments revenue - - - Investment income (loss) (2,807) - - Other - - - Total revenues 136,892 2,165,189 265,290 Expenditures
Current
General government - 24,576 - Community development 42,631 823,401 - Public works - 1,381,716 - Total expenditures 42,631 2,229,693 - Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over (under)
expenditures 94,261 (64,504) 265,290 Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in - - - Transfers out - - (265,290) Total other financing
sources (uses) - - (265,290) Net Change in Fund Balances 94,261 (64,504) - Fund Balances at Beginning of Year 446,322 (32,528) - Fund Balances at End of Year 540,583 $ (97,032)$ -$ Special Revenue Funds

6 0
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended June 30, 2022
Revenues
Intergovernmental
Assessments revenue
Investment income (loss)
Other
Total revenues
Expenditures
Current
General government
Community development
Public works
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over (under)
expenditures
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in
Transfers out
Total other financing
sources (uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
Fund Balances at Beginning of Year
Fund Balances at End of Year
TUMF ATP CalRecycle
Grant Grant Grant
151,431$ 49,028$ 222,566$
- - -
- - (1,349)
- - -
151,431 49,028 221,217
- - -
- - 4,618
102,729 114,628 -
102,729 114,628 4,618
48,702 (65,600) 216,599
- - -
- - (166,910)
- - (166,910)
48,702 (65,600) 49,689
(96,325) (40,515) 181,951
(47,623)$ (106,115)$ 231,640$
Special Revenue Funds

61 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended June 30, 2022

Revenues
Intergovernmental
Assessments revenue
Investment income (loss)
Other
Total revenues
Expenditures
Current
General government
Community development
Public works
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over (under)
expenditures
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in
Transfers out
Total other financing
sources (uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
Fund Balances at Beginning of Year
Fund Balances at End of Year
Community Landscape & Surface
Facilities Lighting Maint. Transportation
District Districts Grant
-$ -$ -$
1,616,612 917,916 -
(23,892) (8,863) -
- 61,564 -
1,592,720 970,617 -
- - - 630,824 809,958 -
- 44,537 -
630,824 854,495 -
961,896 116,122 -
- 414,115 -
(63,082) (20,817) -
(63,082) 393,298 -
898,814 509,420 -
3,240,521 742,353 -
4,139,335 $ 1,251,773 $ -$
Special Revenue Funds

62 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Non-Major Governmental Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended June 30, 2022

Revenues
Intergovernmental
Assessments revenue
Investment income (loss)
Other
Total revenues
Expenditures
Current
General government
Community development
Public works
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over (under)
expenditures
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in
Transfers out
Total other financing
sources (uses)
Net Change in Fund Balances
Fund Balances at Beginning of Year
Fund Balances at End of Year
Measure A 2021 Building Road and
COP Acquisition Bridge
Series 2016 Project COPs Benefit District Totals
-$ -$ -$ 2,993,203 $ - - - 2,534,528 - 171 (10,437) (47,177) - - - 61,564 - 171 (10,437) 5,542,118 - 1,128 - 25,704 - - - 2,311,432 - - - 1,643,610 - 1,128 - 3,980,746 - (957) (10,437) 1,561,372 - - - 414,115 - (282,352) - (798,451) - (282,352) - (384,336) - (283,309) (10,437) 1,177,036 3,282 796,167 1,969,160 7,210,388 3,282 $ 512,858 $ 1,958,723 $ 8,387,424 $ Capital Project Funds

63 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Air Quality Improvement Fund (AQMD) Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Final Budget -
Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 138,338 $ 138,338 $ 139,699 $ 1,361 $ Investment income (loss) 2,500 2,500 (2,807) (5,307) Total revenues 140,838 140,838 136,892 (3,946) Expenditures
Current
Community development 132,000 187,130 42,631 144,499 Net Change in Fund Balance 8,838 (46,292) 94,261 140,553 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 446,322 446,322 446,322 - Fund Balance, End of Year 455,160 $ 400,030 $ 540,583 $ 140,553 $ Budgeted Amounts

64 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 1,346,017 $ 2,165,189 $ 819,172 $ Expenditures
Current
General government 25,000 24,576 424 Community development 1,135,649 823,401 312,248 Public works 1,472,848 1,381,716 91,132 Total expenditures 2,633,497 2,229,693 403,804 Net Change in Fund balance (1,287,480) (64,504) 1,222,976 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year (32,528) (32,528) - Fund Balance, End of Year (1,320,008)$ (97,032)$ 1,222,976 $

65 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual COPS Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 253,821 $ 265,290 $ 11,469 $ Excess of revenues over expenditures 253,821 265,290 11,469 Other financing uses
Transfers out (253,821) (265,290) (11,469) Net Change in Fund Balance - - - Fund balance, Beginning of Year - - - Fund Balance, End of Year -$ -$ -$

66 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 4,304,200 $ 151,431 $ (4,152,769)$ Expenditures
Current
Public works 9,972,404 102,729 9,869,675 Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over
(under) expenditures (5,668,204) 48,702 5,716,906 Net Change in Fund Balance (5,668,204) 48,702 5,716,906 Fund balance, Beginning of Year (96,325) (96,325) - Fund Balance, End of Year (5,764,529)$ (47,623)$ 5,716,906 $

6 7
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Grant Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022
Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 1,545,000$ 49,028$ (1,495,972)$
Expenditures
Current
Public works 2,784,129 114,628 2,669,501
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over
(under) expenditures (1,239,129) (65,600) 1,173,529
Other financing sources (uses)
Transfer in 263,098 - (263,098)
Net Change in Fund Balance (976,031) (65,600) 910,431 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year (40,515) (40,515) -
Fund Balance, End of Year (1,016,546)$ (106,115)$ 910,431$ 6 8
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual CalRecycle Grant Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022
Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Intergovernmental 28,383$ 222,566$ 194,183$
Investment income (loss) - (1,349) (1,349)
Total revenues 28,383 221,217 192,834
Expenditures
Current
Community development - 4,618 (4,618)
Excess of revenues over expenditures 28,383 216,599 188,216 Other financing uses
Transfers out - (166,910) (166,910)
Net Change in Fund Balance 28,383 49,689 21,306
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 181,951 181,951 -
Fund Balance, End of Year 210,334$ 231,640$ 21,306$

69 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Community Facilities District (CFD) Fund
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Assessment revenue 1,327,608 $ 1,616,612 $ 289,004 $ Investment income (loss) - (23,892) (23,892) Total revenues 1,327,608 1,592,720 265,112 Expenditures
Current
Community development 683,052 630,824 52,228 Excess of revenues over expenditures
644,556 961,896 317,340
Other financing sources (uses)
Transfer out (68,304) (63,082) 5,222 Net Change in Fund Balance 576,252 898,814 322,562 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,240,521 3,240,521 - Fund Balance, End of Year 3,816,773 $ 4,139,335 $ 322,562 $

70 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes to Fund Balance - Budget to Actual Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD) Fund Year Ended June 30, 2022

Variance with
Original and Final Budget -
Final Budgeted Actual Positive
Amounts Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Assessments revenue 898,628 $ 917,916 $ 19,288 $ Investment income (loss) 8,160 (8,863) (17,023) Other - 61,564 61,564 Total revenues 906,788 970,617 63,829 Expenditures
Current
Community development 1,100,873 809,958 290,915 Public works 28,325 44,537 (16,212) Total expenditures 1,129,198 854,495 274,703 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over
(under) expenditures (222,410) 116,122 338,532 Other financing sources (uses)
Transfers in - 414,115 414,115 Transfers out (55,752) (20,817) 34,935 Total other financing sources (uses) (55,752) 393,298 449,050 Net Change in Fund Balance (278,162) 509,420 787,582 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 742,353 742,353 - Fund Balance, End of Year 464,191 $ 1,251,773 $ 787,582 $

71 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Proprietary Funds
June 30, 2022

Internal Service Funds

Risk Management Fund

This fund is used to account for the costs of operating a self-insurance program for general liability, workers’ compensation, long-term disability and unemployment compensation. Such costs to other departments are billed at a predetermined rate set annually during the budget process.

Information System Fund

This fund is used to account for the operations of the City’s internal information technology division. Such costs are billed to the departments and/or division based upon a predetermined rate set during the budget process.

72 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Combining Statement of Net Position
Proprietary Funds
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Risk Information
Management Systems Totals
Assets
Current assets
Prepaid Services -$ 17,127 $ 17,127 $ Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable - 13,458 13,458 Due to other funds - 3,669 3,669 Total liabilities -$ 17,127 $ 17,127 $ Internal Service Funds

73 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position Proprietary Funds
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Risk Information
Management Systems Totals
Operating expenses
Contractual services 591,743 $ 343,322 $ 935,065 $ Operating loss (591,743) (343,322) (935,065) Transfers
Transfers in 591,743 343,322 935,065 Net Position, Beginning of Year - - - Net Position, End of Year -$ -$ -$ Internal Service Funds

74 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
Proprietary Funds
Year Ended June 30, 2022

Risk Information
Management Systems Totals
Operating Activities
Cash payments to suppliers of goods and services (591,743)$ (377,975)$ (969,718)$ Net Cash Used for Operating Activities (591,743) (377,975) (969,718) Non Capital Financing Activities
Cash received from other funds 591,743 343,322 935,065 Interfund loans 3,669 3,669
Net Cash Provided by Noncapital Financing Activities 591,743 346,991 938,734 Net (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents - (30,984) (30,984) Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year - 30,984 30,984 Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year -$ -$ -$ Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash
used for operating activities
Operating loss (591,743)$ (343,322)$ (935,065)$ Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net
cash used for operating activities
(Increase) in prepaid expenses - (5,380) (5,380) (Decrease) in accounts payable - (29,273) (29,273) Total adjustments - (34,653) (34,653) Net cash used for
operating activities (591,743)$ (377,975)$ (969,718)$ Internal Service Funds

S
tatistical Section
June 30, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
7 5
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Net Position by Components
(amounts expressed in thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets 14,321$ 12,332$ 20,858$ 22,163$ 29,225$ 32,266$ 33,406$ 35,487$ 41,110$ 42,970$ Restricted 8,132 7,617 7,385 8,091 10,388 11,106 14,384 18,482 26,974 36,607 Unrestricted (4,206) (2,203) 11,718 8,662 210 2,110 8,153 14,945 22,293 32,223 Total governmental activities net assets 18,247$ 17,746$ 39,961$ 38,917$ 39,823$ 45,482$ 55,942$ 68,914$ 90,378$ 111,800$ Source: City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department

76 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Changes in Net Position
(amounts expressed in thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years

Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fis cal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Expenses
Governmental activities:

General government 1,746 $ 2,207 $ 3,511 $ 5,242 $ 7,969 $ 10,175 $ 10,717 $ 13,375 $ 13,243 $ 14,892 $ Community development 199 194 4,429 5,661 5,558 5,621 5,571 6,139 7,801 7,820 Public works 6,974 11,806 4,999 6,748 6,332 5,564 7,963 8,059 8,211 7,949 Public safety 12,762 13,827 15,997 17,759 18,356 19,474 19,817 22,412 21,308 23,341 Interest and fiscal charges - - - - 482 127 164 145 291 316 Total governmental activities expenses 21,681 28,034 28,936 35,410 38,696 40,961 44,233 50,131 50,854 54,318 Program Revenues
Governmental activities:

Charges for services
General government - 62 93 91 345 422 350 268 300 253 Community development 1,841 2,100 3,684 5,589 3,484 3,329 3,293 3,088 3,629 4,177 Public works 363 541 - - 2,101 2,266 1,787 2,042 1,779 2,145 Public safety 183 336 534 518 287 364 414 428 317 465 Operating contributions and grants 5,204 6,697 7,570 7,828 8,214 8,891 12,568 12,557 16,940 19,607 Capital contributions and grants - - 232 290 3,566 2,443 2,329 2,443 3,659 2,988 (2)
Total governmental activities program revenues 7,592 9,736 12,113 14,316 17,998 17,716 20,742 20,827 26,624 29,635 Total government net (expense)/revenues (14,089) $ (18,298) $ (16,823) $ (21,094) $ (20,698) $ (23,245) $ (23,490) $ (29,304) $ (24,231) $ (24,683) $ General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position
General revenues:

Taxes:

Property taxes 4,528 $ 5,597 $ 6,097 $ 6,468 $ 6,649 $ 13,304 $ 14,330 $ 15,599 16,875 17,255 Sales taxes 9,316 8,969 8,744 10,407 10,211 11,273 14,923 21,526 22,214 23,516 Franchise taxes 1,981 2,793 2,695 2,680 4,184 2,790 3,176 3,696 4,121 4,431 Transient occupancy taxes 171 167 208 250 273 284 280 214 311 352 Property transfer tax
(1) - - - - - 484 457 379 468 654 (2) Investment income 8 9 9 23 146 157 235 482 193 (592) Other 226 263 15,301 202 160 612 550 536 550 490 Total governmental activities 16,230 17,799 33,054 20,031 21,623 28,904 33,950 42,432 44,732 46,106 Total Change in Net Position 2,141 $ (500) $ 16,231 $ (1,063) $ 924 $ 5,659 $ 10,460 $ 13,128 $ 20,501 $ 21,423 $ (1) Property transfer tax was included in the total property taxes amount prior to FY 2017-18. (2) Rounded for accuracy of overall totals in presentation Source : City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department

7 7
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
(amounts expressed in thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
General Fund
Nonspendable 5$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5$ -$ 20$ 13$ Restricted - - - - - - - - 962 -
Committed - - - - - - - - - -
Assigned - - - - - - - - - -
Unassigned 10,479 11,934 11,712 8,699 5,314 4,791 8,098 15,071 22,316 33,693 Total general fund 10,484$ 11,934$ 11,712$ 8,699$ 5,314$ 4,791$ 8,103$ 15,071$ 23,298$ 33,707$ All other governmental funds
Nonspendable - - - - - - - - - -
Restricted 8,132 7,617 7,385 7,944 10,388 10,657 14,384 18,482 27,071 36,345 Committed - - - - - - - - -
Assigned - - - - - - - - -
Unassigned (95) - - (178) (522) (433) (1,017) (34) (170) (251) Total all other governmental funds 8,037$ 7,617$ 7,385$ 7,766$ 9,865$ 10,224$ 13,367$ 18,448$ 26,901$ 36,094$ Total fund balances of governmental funds 18,521$ 19,551$ 19,097$ 16,465$ 15,179$ 15,015$ 21,470$ 33,519$ 50,198$ 69,801$ Source: City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department

78 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
(amounts expressed in thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years

Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fis cal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Revenues
Taxes:

Property tax 4,528 $ 5,597 $ 6,096 $ 6,468 $ 6,649 $ 13,304 $ 14,330 $ 15,599 $ 16,875 $ 17,255 $ Sales tax 9,316 8,969 8,744 10,407 10,211 11,273 14,923 21,526 22,214 23,516 Franchise tax 1,981 2,793 2,696 2,680 4,184 2,790 3,176 3,696 4,121 4,431 Transient occupancy tax 171 167 208 250 273 284 280 214 311 352 Other taxes 123 62 - - - 484 457 379 468 654 Licenses and permits 637 770 1,342 1,421 1,634 1,645 1,438 1,380 1,792 2,353 Intergovernmental 4,833 5,889 5,274 4,427 6,710 6,210 8,293 10,188 11,751 12,230 Charges for services 1,436 2,234 3,093 3,147 4,010 4,018 3,722 3,849 3,703 4,060 Developer impact fees - - 2,314 3,118 2,703 3,515 2,778 2,818 4,478 5,135 Operating contributions and grants - - 270 190 - - - - - - Fines and forfeitures 183 336 534 518 465 574 557 520 455 626 Developer contributions - - 232 290 788 93 1,451 1,033 1,992 2,499 Assessments revenue 923 1,520 1,617 1,831 2,122 2,301 2,534 (1)
Investment income 15 9 9 23 146 157 235 482 192 (592) Other 104 263 221 202 174 648 523 583 622 538 Total revenues 23,325 27,089 31,033 34,065 39,467 46,613 53,992 64,389 71,275 75,592 Expenditures
Current:

General government 1,737 2,198 3,495 5,316 7,684 9,946 10,189 12,792 22,591 13,830 Community development 198 194 4,408 5,425 5,558 5,621 5,571 6,166 7,783 7,740 Public works 4,605 9,773 7,941 8,116 17,435 11,033 10,389 9,220 9,291 8,751 Public safety 12,698 13,766 15,922 17,652 18,356 19,474 19,817 22,412 21,343 23,341 Debt service:

Principal retirement - - - - 270 150 745 765 790 990 Interest and fiscal charges - - - - 218 317 314 289 248 403 (1)
Cost of issuance - - - - 328 - - - 149 - 19,239 25,930 31,766 36,509 49,849 46,541 47,025 51,644 62,194 55,055 Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures 4,087 1,159 (733) (2,444) (10,382) 71 6,968 12,745 9,081 20,537 Other financing sources/(uses)
Proceeds of loan from County 6,019 - - - - - - - - - Transfers in 155 96 1,079 325 2,417 2,489 2,890 1,129 1,198 1,390 Transfers out (248) (225) (1,238) (513) (2,630) (2,725) (3,402) (1,669) (1,718) (2,325) Bonds issued - - - - 8,165 - - - 6,935 - Premium on bonds issued - - - - 1,163 - - - 222 - Total other financing sources/(uses) 5,926 (129) (159) (188) 9,115 (236) (512) (540) 6,637 (935) Net change in fund balance 10,013 1,030 (892) (2,632) (1,267) (165) 6,456 12,205 15,718 19,602 Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expendit ures 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.67% 1.01% 2.30% 2.08% 1.95% 2.59% (1) Rounded for accuracy of overall totals in presentation Source : City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department

7 9
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Tax Revenues by Source, General Fund
(amounts expressed in thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Transient
Year Property Sales & Use Franchise Occupancy Other Total 2013 4,528$ 9,316$ 1,981$ 171$ 123$ 16,119$
2014 5,597 8,969 2,793 167 62 17,588
2015 6,096 8,744 2,696 208 - 17,744
2016 6,468 10,407 2,680 250 - 19,805
2017 6,649 10,211 4,184 273 - 21,317
2018 13,304 (1) 11,273 2,790 284 484 28,135
2019 14,330 (1) 14,923 3,176 280 457 33,165
2020 15,599 (1) 21,526 3,696 214 379 41,414
2021 16,875 (1) 22,214 4,121 311 468 43,989
2022 17,255 (1) 23,516 4,431 352 654 46,208
(1) The City began receiving Property taxes in lieu of motor vehicle fees in FY 2017-18 following adoption of SB130 in May 2017.

Source: City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department
8 0
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property (amounts expressed in thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Less Tax Direct
Fiscal Residential Commercial Industrial Total Assessed Exempt Total Taxable Tax Rate Year Property Property Property Other Valuation Property Assessed Value (City) 2013 3,594,252$ 427,294$ 1,775,487$ 599,155$ 6,396,187$ (43,846)$ 6,352,341$ 0.06933 2014 3,786,080 429,880 1,828,067 1,050,966 7,094,992 (44,707) 7,050,285 0.10347 2015 4,057,872 433,123 1,855,743 1,067,843 7,414,581 (45,601) 7,368,980 0.10196 2016 4,359,971 446,341 1,972,845 1,105,654 7,884,812 (46,292) 7,838,519 0.10011 2017 4,738,804 474,480 2,129,295 1,187,869 8,530,447 (47,027) 8,483,420 0.09838 2018 5,211,669 512,513 2,235,742 1,189,217 9,149,141 (44,814) 9,104,327 0.09650 2019 5,755,980 548,638 2,323,451 1,182,895 9,810,963 (45,710) 9,765,253 0.06560 2020 6,347,192 582,345 2,499,876 1,141,554 10,570,967 - 10,570,967 1.06560 2021 6,741,561 624,637 2,931,559 1,147,474 11,445,232 - 11,445,232 0.09136 2022 7,152,037 649,001 2,864,889 1,163,534 11,829,461 - 11,829,461 0.09028 Source: HdL, Coren & Cone

81 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates
Last Ten Fiscal Years

Basic County,
Fiscal City, and Community
Year School Levy College District Water District School District Total 2013 1.00000 0.06292 0.16600 0.43349 1.66241
2014 1.00000 0.05958 0.16600 0.46506 1.69064
2015 1.00000 0.05721 0.16600 0.43363 1.65684
2016 1.00000 0.05755 0.16600 0.50210 1.72565
2017 1.00000 0.05149 0.16600 0.53743 1.75492
2018 1.00000 0.05376 0.15600 0.51817 1.72793
2019 1.00000 0.05548 0.15600 0.53418 1.74566
2020 1.00000 0.04766 0.14600 0.39256 1.58622
2021 1.00000 0.07980 0.14600 0.53535 1.76115
2022 1.00000 0.06810 0.13350 0.54449 1.74609
Source : County of Riverside, Tax Rates by Tax Rate Areas (2017-2018) Schedule; HdL, Coren & Cone City Direct Rates

82 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Principal Property Taxpayers
Current and Nine Years Ago

Percentage of Percentage of
Total Taxable Total Taxable
Taxable Assessed Assessed Taxable Assessed Assessed
Taxpayer Value Value Value Value
Costco Wholesale Corporation 103,947,782 $ 1.64% 269,084,816 $ 2.27% Bre Space Cella LLC 248,324,126 2.10%
UPS Supply Chain Solutions General Services Inc. 88, 302,210 1.39% 130,361,992 1.10% Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association 104,554,1 98 1.65% 121,359,979 1.03% Bre Space Cella 0.00% - 0.00%
Nestle Food Company 0.00% 78,190,503 0.66%
Lesso Mall Dev Jurupa Valley Limited 0.00% 75,054,145 0.63% COMREF So California Industrial 0.00% 70,199,631 0.59% AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III 0.00% 68,120,971 0.58% Metal Container Corporation 66,962,730 1.05% 67,820,893 0.57% Lineage Master RE 3 LLC 63,163,277 0.99% 57,157,952 0.48% MGB X Vernola LLC (Vernola Marketplace) 57,098,070 0.90% - 0.00% Home Depot USA Inc. 49,463,870 0.78% - 0.00% TCAM Core Properties Fund Operating 48,564,583 0.76% - 0.00% Space Center Mira Loma Inc. 46,221,295 0.73% - 0.00% Prefco XVIII Limited 44,295,358 0.70% - 0.00% Total 672,573,373 $ 10.59% 1,185,675,008 $ 10.01% Source : HdL, Coren & Cone
2022 2013

8 3
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Property Tax Levies and Collections
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Taxes Levied Collection in
Fiscal For the Fiscal Percentage of Subsequent Percentage of Year Year Amount Levy Years Amount Levy
2013 4,146,481$ 4,030,936$ 97.21% 115,545$ 4,146,481$ 100.00% 2014 4,473,310 4,319,380 96.56% 153,930 4,473,310 100.00% 2015 4,611,753 4,593,320 99.60% 18,433 4,611,753 100.00% 2016 4,740,260 4,690,434 98.95% 49,826 4,740,260 100.00% 2017 4,913,741 4,844,250 98.59% 69,491 4,913,741 100.00% 2018 5,092,844 4,997,898 98.14% - 4,997,898 98.14% 2019 5,312,103 5,289,275 99.57% - 5,289,275 99.57% 2020 5,643,767 5,496,964 97.40% - 5,496,964 97.40% 2021 5,795,928 5,716,196 98.62% - 5,716,196 98.62% 2022 6,094,709 5,866,725 96.26% - 5,866,725 96.26% Source: City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department; Riverside County Auditor-Controller's "2017-2018 Statement of Original Charge" Year of the Levy
Collected within the Fiscal
Total Collections to Date
8 4
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Percentage
General Lease Certificates Unamortized Total Percentage of of Fiscal Obligation Revenue of Premium on Governmental Personal Assessed Debt per Year Bonds Bonds Participation CoP Activities Income (1) Value Capita 2013 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - -$
2014 - - - - - - - -
2015 - - - - - - - -
2016 - - - - - - - -
2017 - - 7,895,000 1,098,761 8,993,761 0.49% 0.11% 88.77 2018 - - 7,745,000 908,832 8,653,832 0.45% 0.10% 81.60 2019 - - 7,000,000 758,819 7,758,819 0.37% 0.08% 72.98 2020 - - 6,235,000 615,381 6,850,381 0.31% 0.06% 63.97 2021 - - 12,380,000 700,898 13,080,898 0.55% 0.11% 121.01 2022 - - 11,390,000 572,110 11,962,110 0.47% 0.10% 113.51 Notes:
(1) These ratios are calculated using personal income and population based on the schedule of demographic and economic statistics
Source: City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department

85 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Legal Debt Margin Information
(amounts expressed in thousands)
Last Ten Fiscal Years

Total Debt
Legal Debt Amount of Applicable to
Limit (15% of Debt the Limit as
Fiscal Assessed Assessed Applicable to Legal Debt a Pe rcentage Year Valuation Value) Debt Limit Margin of the Debt
2013 6,407,560 $ 961,134 $ - $ 961,134 $ 0.0% 2014 7,160,161 1,074,024 - 1,074,024 0.0% 2015 7,429,187 1,114,378 - 1,114,378 0.0% 2016 7,838,519 1,175,778 - 1,175,778 0.0% 2017 8,483,420 1,272,513 - 1,272,513 0.0% 2018 9,104,327 1,365,649 - 1,365,649 0.0% 2019 9,765,263 1,464,789 - 1,464,789 0.0% 2020 10,570,967 1,585,645 - 1,585,645 0.0% 2021 11,445,232 1,716,785 - 1,716,785 0.0% 2022 11,829,461 1,774,419 - 1,774,419 0.0% Note : Section 43605 of the Government Code of the State of California limits the amount of general bonded indebtedness for public improvements to 15% of the assessed valuation of all real and personal property of the City. The City has no general obligation bonded debt.

Sources : HdL, Coren & Cone Demographic & Economic Statist ics report

86 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Pledged Revenue Coverage
Last Ten Fiscal Years

Fiscal Measure A
Year Sales Tax Revenue Principal Interest Coverage
2013 - $ - $ - $ - 2014 - - - - 2015 - - - - 2016 - - - - 2017 1,943,104 270,000 218,093 3.98 2018 1,938,244 150,000 317,265 4.15 2019 2,306,471 745,000 314,458 2.18 2020 2,244,525 765,000 288,701 2.13 2021 2,878,604 790,000 266,854 2.72 2022 3,897,841 820,000 221,644 3.74 Note: The City did not issue any debt prior ro FY 2016-2017; therfore, there is no applicable data for those years.

Source : City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department
Certificates of Participation - Local Measure A Sales Tax Debt Service

8 7
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Personal Per Capita
Calendar Income in Personal Unemployment
Year Population Thousands Income Median Age Rate
2012 97,246 1,039,993$ 10,694$ 29.9 14.9%
2013 97,774 1,743,702 17,834 30.4 12.8%
2014 97,738 1,797,500 18,391 30.8 10.6%
2015 98,177 1,806,787 18,403 30.9 8.7%
2016 101,315 1,847,987 18,240 30.9 5.7%
2017 106,054 1,937,729 18,271 31.5 4.7%
2018 106,318 2,083,925 19,600 31.7 3.9%
2019 107,083 2,215,584 20,690 32.2 3.7%
2020 108,097 2,361,047 21,841 32.1 5.2%
2021 105,384 2,562,113 24,312 32.9 7.0%
Sources: HdL, Coren & Cone Demographic & Economic Statistics report (1) Population - California Department of Finance
(2) Personal Income - California Franchise Tax Board, adjusted gross income for zip code 92509 (3) Median Age - U.S. Census Bureau State of California - for zip code 92509 (4) Unemployment Rate - California Employment Development Department

88 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Employment by Industry
Current Year and Nine Years Ago

Percent of Percent of
Industry Labor Force Total Labor Force Total
Farm 13,900 0.88% 13,700 2.44%
Goods Producing 205,400 12.98% 72,500 12.93% Trade, Transportation and Utilities 443,100 27.99% 124,600 22.22% Information 9,600 0.61% 9,700 1.73% Financial Activities 44,900 2.84% 18,100 3.23% Professional and Business Services 167,300 10.57% 54,700 9.76% Education and Health Services 253,300 16.00% 62,900 11.22% Leisure and Hospitality 158,900 10.04% 72,800 12.98% Other Services 43,000 2.72% 19,100 3.41% Government 243,600 15.39% 112,600 20.08% Total 1,583,000 100.00% 560,700 100.00% Note : Information on the largest employers for the Cit y of Jurupa Valley is not available. Presented above is the annual average of Industry Employment & Labor Force for Riverside County as of March 2021.

Source : State of California Employment Development Department 2021 2012

89 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Full-time City Employees by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years

(1) (1) (2) (3)
General Community
Fiscal Year Government Public Works Public Safety Servi ces Total 2013 - - - - - 2014 - - - - - 2015 1.00 - - - 1.00 2016 10.65 1.00 - - 11.65 2017 11.30 1.00 - - 12.30 2018 11.30 4.00 - - 15.30 2019 12.30 4.00 - - 16.30 2020 16.40 4.00 - - 20.40 2021 31.90 7.00 - - 38.90 2022 51.10 21.00 - - 72.10 Notes :
(1) The City of Jurupa Valley has staff employed in City Manager, Finance and Administration, Community Development and Public Works departments.

The City contracts services for the remaining General Government, Public Works, and Community Development functions through third party consultants. (2) The City of Jurupa Valley contracts Public Safety services through the County of Riverside Sheriff's Department. (3) Community Services are provided by the Jurupa Community Services District.

Sources : City of Jurupa Valley Finance Department

90 City of Jurupa Valley, California
Taxable Sales by Category
Last Ten Fiscal Years

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Apparel Stores 14,541 $ 15,326 $ 17,557 $ 19,114 $ 19,137 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Auto Dealers and Suppliers 60,624 61,426 71,554 68,635 73,733 86,125 103,021 87,881 105,719 Building Materials 56,898 64,223 74,485 71,812 76,533 87,739 97,501 104,374 118,569 Eating and Drinking Places 71,742 76,177 85,629 93,515 99,513 102,974 107,355 108,772 134,034 Food Stores 34,462 37,383 41,665 44,127 45,042 46,802 46,719 51,313 52,768 General Merchandise 15,455 15,312 14,410 14,240 10,821 13,773 22,252 8,353 8,316 Service Stations 173,898 178,535 161,296 142,871 165,317 201,034 208,506 208,442 295,477 Other Retail Stores 63,356 66,514 66,583 95,243 99,026 126,085 129,376 188,236 270,341 All Other Outlets 420,225 427,302 426,036 474,985 503,097 602,560 1,014,287 1,307,484 1,235,643 Total 911,201 $ 942,198 $ 959,215 $ 1,024,542 $ 1,092,219 $ 1,267,092 $ 1,729,017 $ 2,064,855 $ 2,220,867 $ Note : Due to confidentiality issues, the names of the ten largest revenue payers are not available. The categories presented are intended to provide alternative information regarding the sources of the City's revenue.

Source : State of California Board of Equalization; Calif ornia Department of Taxes and Fees Administration, State Controller's Office, The HdL Companies

9 1
City of Jurupa Valley, California
Top 25 Sales Tax Producers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
Business Business
Business Name Category Business Name Category
Allbirds Shoe Stores Adler Tank Rentals Repair Shop/Equip Rentals Alpha Materials Building Materials Arco AM PM Service Stations Arco AM PM Service Stations Arco AM PM Service Stations Arco AM PM Service Stations Arco AM PM Service Stations Arco AM PM Service Stations Arco AM PM Service Stations Circle K Service Stations Chevron Service Stations
Costco Distribution Center Fulfillment Centers Circle K Service Stations Crest Steel Corporation Heavy Industrial Circle K 76 Service Stations Edward Don & Company Food Service Equip/Supplies Costco Distribution Center Fulfillment Centers El Dorado National Trailers/Auto Parts Edward Don & Company Food Service Equip/Supplies Flying J Travel Centers Service Stations Gasco Service Stations Lowes Building Materials Kmart Discount Dept Stores
Merchants Metals Contractors Lowes Building Materials
Mobile Modular Management Trailers/RVs Mobile Modular Management Trailers/RVs Orco Block Contractors Mostamand Shell Service Stations Quicksilver Distribution Center Fulfillment Centers Orco Block Contractors Ross Family Apparel Pacific Mobile Structures Heavy Industrial S W School Supply Office Supplies/Furniture Peggs Company Office Supplies/Furniture Shell Service Stations Penske Truck Leasing Transportation/Rentals Southwest Material Handling Warehse/Farm/Const. Equipment Ross Family Apparel Stater Bros Grocery Stores Shell Service Stations
Stiiizy Cannabis Related Southwest Material Handling Warehouse/Farm/Const Equip Taylor Metal Contractors Stater Bros Grocery Stores
Trinity Equipment Rentals Repair Shop/Equip. Rentals Universal Forest Products Cibtractors United Pacific Service Stations Valley Way Arco Service Stations Percentage of Fiscal Year Total
Paid by Top 25 Accounts 58.00% 53.58%
Source: HdL Reports - Firms listed alphabetically (April through March data for each year) Fiscal Year 2021-22 Fiscal Year 2012-13
Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER

PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.L

AWARD CONSTRUCTIO N AGREEMENT TO IE GENERAL
ENGINEERING INC. OF BEAUMONT, CA. FOR SUNNYSLOPE AREA
SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE, CIP #19107

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council approve and award a construction agreement to IE General Engineering Inc. of Beaumont, CA. in the amount of $2,24 6,197.00 for the Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure, CIP #19107, for the work included in its bid proposal and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the form attached hereto; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related minor amendments to the Agreement with IE General Engineering, Inc., up to 10% as contingency to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to record the Notice of Completion upon acceptance of the work by the City Engineer.

BACKGROUND
At its regular meeting on August 18, 2022, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026 -2027 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”). The Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure project , CIP #19107 was included in the previous five-year CIP and subsequently carried over to the most recently adopted CIP.

The project scope consists of grinding and overlaying the street, reconstruction of curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach, removal and reconstruction of fences, wall etc., asphalt pavement, and adjusting the manholes and water valves to grade and striping.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

On October 19, 2022, a Notice Inviting Bids was published on PlanetBids, the City’s online web based procurement and bidding system, and the local newspaper, Press Enterprise.

Three addendums were issued during the solicitation period.

ANALYSIS
Formal bidding procedures were followed in accordance with the Public Contract Code.

Four (4) bids were received on November 22 , 2022, and bids were opened soon aft er 2:00 p.m. with the following results:

Bidder Total Amount

1. IE General Engineering Inc., Beaumont, CA $2,246,197.00

2. PUB Construction, Pomona, CA $3,423,916.74

3. Gentry General, Rancho Cucamonga, CA $4,573,608.25

4. Hardy & Harper, Lake Forest, CA $5,090,000.00

All bids were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. IE General Engineering Inc. is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with a bid in the amount $2,246,197.00. IE General Engineering Inc. is a reputable construction company who has successfully completed public works projects in the Inland Empire and their work and references were found to be satisfactory. The Engineer’s cost estimate for this project was $2,553,320.00.

City Public Works /Engineering Department Staff will provide construction oversight. A construction management firm , which includes monitoring compliance with contract documents, including temporary construction traffic control, and preparation of monthly progress payment reports, will perform inspection services and various administrative activities related to the project.

The project was evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined to be exempt as it is considered as a maintenance project.

If approved, t he Agreement will be administered by the Public Works/City Engineering Department Staff.

The project location map is attached for reference.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The anticipated project construction cost is $ 2,600,000.00, which includes the 1 0% contingency to cover the unforeseen field condition s, construction management/inspection services as well as the engineering testing materials. The project is funded by Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 4 and Measure “A” funds as part of CIP project No. 19107. The budgeted funds are sufficient to cover the cost of the project and the necessary support services.

Page | 3

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve Agreement and related actions.

2. Provide alternative direction to Staff.
************************ SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *************************

Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 1
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. 5487(003)
SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
THIS Agreement, made and entered into the 19th day of January, 2023, by and between the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City" and IE General Engineering, Inc., hereinafter called the "Contractor."
That the City and the Contractor for the consideration hereinafter named, agree as follows:

1. Scope of Services. Contractor shall perform the work and provide all labor, materials, equipment and services, except as otherwise provided in the Plans or Special Provisions, in a good and workmanlike manner for the project identified as Sunnyslope SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure (“Project”), in accordance with this Agreement. The complete Agreement includes all of the Documents as if set forth in full herein, to wit, including the Agreement, any and all Contract Change Orders issued after the execution of the Agreement, Addenda No(s). 1, 2, and 3 issued prior to the opening of the Bids, the Special Provisions (which includes the General Provisions and Technical Provisions), the Project Plans, the Standard Plans, the Standard Specification, reference Specifications, the Bidder's Proposal, the Notice Inviting Bids, the Non-Collusion Affidavit, the Faithful Performance Bond, the Labor and Materials Payment Bond and insurance (the “Documents”), all of which are essential parts of the Agreement between City and Contractor and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. In the event of any conflict in the provisions thereof, the terms of said Documents as set forth above shall control, each over the other, in the order provided.

2. Compensation. The City will pay the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the Bid Schedule as full compensation for the work required under the bid items awarded by the City, to wit, the Base Bid Item(s) in the sum total amount of two million two hundred forty-six thousand one hundred ninety-seven dollars ($2,246,197.00), subject to additions or reductions of the quantities of the various bid items at the unit prices bid, for furnishing all materials and for doing all the work contemplated and embraced under the Documents.

3. Payments. City shall make payments within thirty (30) days after receipt of an undisputed and properly submitted payment request from Contractor. City shall return to Contractor any payment request determined not to be a proper payment request as soon as practicable, but not later than seven (7) days after receipt, and shall explain in writing the reasons why the payment request is not proper.

A payment shall be made as the City Council of the City prescribes upon estimates approved by the City Council. However, progress payments shall not be made in excess of ninety -five percent (95%) of the percentage of actual work completed plus a like percentage of the value of material delivered on the ground or stored subject to, or under the control of, the City, and unused. The City shall withhold not less than five percent (5%) of the Agreement price until final completion and acceptance of the Project. However, at any time after fifty percent (50%) of the work has been completed, if the City Council of the City finds that satisfactory progress is being made, it may, at its discretion, make any of the remaining progress payments in full for actual work completed.

Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 2

4. Time. The Contractor hereby agrees to commence work pursuant to this Agreement within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of authorization specified in the Notice to Proceed. The Contractor agrees to diligently prosecute the work, including corrective items of work, day to day thereafter, to completion, within sixty (60 ) working days after said date in the “Notice to Proceed with Construction,” except as adjusted by subsequent Contract Change Order(s).

5. Liquidated Damages. The City and Contractor hereby agree that in case all construction called for under the Agreement is not completed within the time hereinabove specified, including City caused delays or extensions, damages will be sustained by the City and that, it is and will be impracticable or extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual amount of damages the City will sustain in the event of, and by reason of, such delay.

It is, therefore, agreed that such damages shall be p resumed to be in the amount of $1,000.00 per calendar day, and that the Contractor will pay to the City, or City may retain from amounts otherwise payable to Contractor, said amount for each calendar day by which the Contractor fails to complete the work, including corrective items of work, under this Agreement within the time hereinabove specified and as adjusted by Contract Change Order(s). The Contractor will not be assessed liquidated damages for delay(s) occasioned by the failure of the City or of the owner of a utility to provide for the removal or relocation of utility facilities.

6. Insurance. The Contractor shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect: (1) a policy or policies of broad -form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $2,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss, or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by the Contractor, its officers, representatives, volunteers, e mployees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00; (3) automotive liability insurance with a minimum combined single limits coverage of $1,000,000.00; and (4) workers’ compensation insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 or the amount required by law, whichever is greater.

Acceptable insurance coverage shall be from an admitted corporate surety insurer licensed in the State of California, approved by the City, and with a rating of, or equivalent to, A:VII by A.M. Best & Company. Any deviation from this rule shall require specific approval, in writing, from the City.

All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non-renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through addition of additional insured to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving the City thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof by certified mail, return receipt requested. The Contractor agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify said insurance coverage.

The Contractor agrees that if it does not keep the aforesaid insurance in full force and effect, and such insurance is available at a reasonable cost, the City may take out the necessary insurance and pay the premium thereon, and the repayment thereof shall be deemed an obligation of the Contractor and the cost of such insurance may be deducted, at the option of the City, fro m payments due the Contractor.

Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 3
The Contractor shall submit to the City (1) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum workers’ compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements not less than one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement.

Any deductibles must be declared to and approved by the City.

The general liability and automobile liability policies must contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: “The City of Jurupa Valley, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as insureds with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the contractor; and with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with the work or operations.” The insurance provided by Contractor shall be primary to any coverage available to the City.

The Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required herein. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City may require, at any time, complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage.

7. Bonds. The Contractor hereby agrees to provide and maintain in effect two (2) good and sufficient Surety Bonds for one hundred percent (100%) each of the contract price. The bonds shall be a "Faithful Performance Bond" which shall guarantee the faithful performance of all work and a "Labor and Materials Payment Bond" which shall secure the payment of the claims of labor, mechanics, or materialmen for all work under the Agreement pursuant to Section 9550 of the Civil Code.

8. Contractor’s Guarantee. The Contractor, the Contractor’s heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns guaran tee that all work performed under this Agreement fully meets the requirements thereof as to quality of workmanship and materials furnished. If any defects in materials or workmanship become evident within a period of one year from the date of the acceptanc e of the work by the City Council, the Contractor shall, at his or her own expense, make any repair(s) or replacement(s) necessary to restore the work to full compliance with the Plans and Specifications.

9. Labor Standards and Prevailing Wages. The Contractor shall comply with the Davis -Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC a-276, a-5) and the implementation regulations thereof.

The Contractor acknowledges that work under this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages pursuant to Section 177 0 and 1773 et seq. of the Labor Code of the State of California, the Director of Industrial Relations (State Prevailing Wages), and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Federal Labor Standards Provisions (Davis-Bacon Act Prevailing Wages). The Contractor to whom the contract is awarded, and all subcontractors under him, shall pay the higher of the Federal or State prevailing wage rate for any given classification employed in the performance of this contract.

The Federal wage decision is the one in effect ten (10) days prior to bid opening; it is available online at: https://www.wdol.gov/wdol/scafiles/davisbacon/ca.html. The State wage decision is available online at: https://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 4
Contractor acknowledges that the applicable Wage Determination for this project is:

General Decision Number: CA20220025
Modification Number: CA20220025
Date: November 16, 2022

10. Third Party Claims. City shall have full authority to compromise or otherwise settle any claim relating to the Agreement at any time. City shall timely notify Contractor of the receipt of any third - party claim relating to the Agreement. City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs incurred in providing this notice.

11. Antitrust Claims. Contractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Sec tion 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the California Business and Professions Code) arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties.

12. Claim Dispute Resolution. In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of work, but shall proceed with the performance of the work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disput es and protests between the parties. The disputed work will be categorized as an “unresolved dispute” and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by mutual agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all disputed work, claims and other disputed matters
All claims arising out of or related to the Agreement or this Project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104 et seq. (Article 1.5), where applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as though fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must file a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to filing a construction claim in compliance with Section 9204 and Article 1.5 (if applicable), and must then adhere to Article 1.5 and Section 9204, as applicable, pursuant to the definition of “claim” as individually defined therein.

13. Debarred, Suspended or Ineligible Contractors . Contractor shall not be debarred throughout the duration of this Agreement. Contractor shall not perform work with debarred subcontractor pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or 1777.7.

No contract shall be made to parties listed on the General Services Administration's List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs in accordance with Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension,” as set forth at 24 CFR part 24. This list contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, and contractors declared ineligible u nder statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Contractors with awards that exceed the small purchase threshold shall provide the required certification regarding its exclusion status and that of its principal employees.

14. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees not to accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement or within twelve (12) months after completion of the work under this Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 5
Agreement which is or may likely make Contractor “financially interested,” as provided in Government Code Section 1090 and 87100, in any decisions made by City on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained pursuant to this Agreement.

Contractor shall comply with the Conflict of Int erest provisions, as applicable, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.112 and 24 CFR Part 570.611 and other federal Conflict of Interest requirements.

15. Trenching and Excavations. If the project involves trenching more than four (4) feet deep, Contractor shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify the City in writing of any:
material that Contractor believes may be hazardous waste, as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 25117, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated; or unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Agreement. The City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if the City finds that the conditions do materially differ or do involve hazardous waste and cause a decrease or increase in Contractor’s cost of or the time required for performance of any part of the work, the City shall issue a change order.

16. Utilities. The City acknowledges its responsibilities under Government Code section 4215 and incorporates that section herein by this reference.

17. Location of Existing Elements . The methods used and costs involved to locate existing elements, points of connection and all construction methods are Contractor’s sole responsibility. Accuracy of information furnished, as to existing conditions, is not guaranteed by the City. Contractor, at its sole expense, must make all investigations necessary to determine locations of existing elements, which may include, without limitation, contacting U.S.A. Alert and other private underground locating firm(s), utilizing specialized locating equipment and/or hand trenching.

18. Wage and Hour Laws. The Contractor shall, as a penalty, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of the Agreement for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 18 13. As provided for in California Labor Code Section 1810, a legal day’s work is 8 hours of labor in any one calendar day.

19. Audits and Records. The Contractor shall maintain and keep books and records on a current basis, recording all transactions pertaining to this Agreement in a form in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles. The City or its representative shall have the option of inspecting and/or auditing all records and other written materials used by Contractor in preparing its billings to the City as a condition precedent to any payment to Contractor. Contractor will promptly furnish documents requested by the City. Additionally, Contractor shall be subject to State Auditor examination and audit at the request of the City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of four (4) years after final payment under this Agreement.

20. Special Federal Requirements.

The Contractor does hereby acknowledge that this project will be partially or fully funded with Active Transportation Program grant funding, which Program was created by Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statutes 2013) and Assembly Bill 101 (Chapter 354, Statutes 2013) and is therefore subject to applicable Federal procurement, labor, environmental, equal opportunity, and other regulations or requirements, including, but not limited to those set forth in Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations- Highways, 23 U.S.C. 633 Subpart A-Federal-Aid Construction Contracts (Other than Appalachian Contract), the Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 6
Required Contract Provisions set forth in Form FHWA 1273 and 29 CFR 5.5, any California Department of Transportation grant requirements as set forth in the Program Supplement No. T19 Rev. 1, effective October 9, 2019 to Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 00511S for Federal Projects, which was entered into between the City and the State of California effective June 30, 2017, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Contractor shall comply with the requirements in the above-referenced documents and any applicable state, federal or local requirements and/or assist City with compliance as applicable, and also incorporate all applicable provisions in the documents noted above and any requirements into any subcontractor agreements.

21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Contractor. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiation s, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be modified or amended, nor any provision or breach waived, except in a writing signed by both parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.

22. Termination. This Agreement may be canceled by the City at any time with or without cause without penalty upon thirty (30) days' written notice. In the event of termination without fault of Contractor, City shall pay Contractor for all services satisfactorily rendered prior to date of termination, and such payment shall be in full satisfaction of all services rendered hereunder.

23. Substitution of Securities . Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, the Contractor will be permitted the substitution of securities for any monies withheld by the City of Jurupa Valley to ensure performance under this Agreement. At the request and expense of the Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the City of Jurupa Valley, or with a state or federally chartered bank as the escrow agent, who shall pay such monies to the Contractor.

Securities eligible for substitution under this section shall include those listed in Section 16430 of the Government Code, bank or savings and loan certificates of deposit, interest- bearing demand deposit accounts, and standby letters of credit. The Contractor shall be the beneficial owner of any securities substituted for monies withheld and shall receive any dividends or interest thereon. The Contractor shall give the City written notice within thirty (30) days after this Agreement is awarded that it desires to substitute securities for money that would ordinarily be withheld. If the substituted securities are deposited into an escrow, the escrow shall be governed by a written escrow agreement in a form which is substantially similar to the agreement set forth in Section 22300, of the Public Contract Code.

24. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Jurupa Valley, and their officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, and assigns (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith (collectively “Liabilities”), arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, incidental to, or related to any act, failure to act, error, or omission of Contractor or any of its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers or their officers, agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection wit h, resulting from, or related to this Agreement or the performance or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement, including this indemnity provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concu rrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by Indemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify Indemnitees against any such negligence. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 7
may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against an Indemnitee shall be conclusive in fav or of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. Contractor shall pay Indemnitees for any attorney’s fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to encompass (a) Indemnitees' sole negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code 2782(a) or (b) the contracting public agency's active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code 2782(b). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under the Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. The Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, l osses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees.

25. Assignment. The parties do for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns agree to the full performance of all of the provisions herein contained. The Contractor may not, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign any obligation assumed by the Contractor hereunder without prior written consent of the City.

26. Attorney’s Fees. If any legal action or other proceeding, including action for declaratory relief, is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default o r misrepresentation in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees, experts’ fees, and other costs, in addition to any other relief to which the party may be entitled.

27. Worker’s Compensation Insurance. By my signature hereunder, as Contractor, I certify that I am aware of the Provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the Provisions of that code, and I will comply with such Provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement.

28. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date of the Award of Contract by the City of Jurupa Valley.

29. Contractor’s License. Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractors' State License Board. Any questions concerning a Contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors’ State License Board, 3132 Bradshaw Road, Sacramento, CA 95826. Mailing address: P.O. Box 26000, Sacramento, CA 95826.

30. Recovered Materials and Solid Waste Disposal Act. Contractor agrees to comply with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 6962), including but not limited to the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR Part 247, and Executive Order 12873, as they apply to the procurement of the items designated in Subpart B of 40 CFR Part 247.

31. Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment. Contractor shall not procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, or enter into a contract to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that use covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115 -232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation, or Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 8
any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities. Covered equipment also includes video surveillance and telecommunications equipment or services provided by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital T echnology Company, Dahua Technology Company, any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities, and any entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.

32. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, State and local laws, ordinances, codes an d regulations in force at the time the Contractor performs pursuant to the Contract Documents, and shall comply with all grant or funding terms and conditions applicable to the Contract and/or the work.
********** (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) **********
Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 9

INTERNAL USE ONLY
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:

Peter Thorson, City Attorney
Date
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Paul Toor, P.E., Director of Public Work / City
Engineer
(if contract exceeds $5,000)
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, ______________________________________ Municipal Corporation (Name of Contractor)
License No./
BY: Classification: ___________________________
Rod Butler, City Manager, City of Jurupa Valley
Expiration Date:

Date: Federal I.D. No.:

PRINT NAME:

SIGNATURE:

TITLE:

DATE:

Date
PRINT NAME:

SIGNATURE:

TITLE:

DATE:

Date
SIGNING INSTRUCTION TO THE CONTRACTOR:

All signatures on the Agreement on behalf of the Contractor must be acknowledged before a notary public.

General Partners must sign on behalf of the partnership.

NOTE: In the event that the contracting firm is a corporation, two (2) corporate officers having authority from the corporation MUST sign (two (2) signatures total). If the corporation has a corporate resolution stating that one person is authorized to sign on behalf of all officers, attach corporate resolution immediately following the notary certificates. Corporate Seal may be affixed hereto.

Faithful Performance Bond - 1
BOND NO.

PREMIUM $

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
(100% of Total Contract Amount)
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. 5487(003)
CITY PROJECT NO. 19107
SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, known as "City," has awarded to IE General Engineering, Inc., as Principal hereinafter designated as "Contractor" and have entered into an Agreement whereby the Contractor agrees to construct or install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said Agreement, effective on the date signed by the City Manager, and identified as Project No. 19107, is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, said Contractor under the terms of said Agreement is required to furnish a bond guaranteeing the faithful performance of said Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, we the undersigned Contractor and , as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside in the penal sum of two million two hundred forty-six thousand one hundred ninety-seven dollars, ($2,246,197.00) lawful money of the United States, to be paid to the said City or its certain attorney, its successors and assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the above bound Contractor, his or her or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in said Agreement and any alterations thereof made as therein provided, on his or her or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Jurupa Valley, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. In the event suit is brought upon this bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney fee to be fixed by the court.

The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder, or the Provisions accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or the Provisions.
(SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
10 Faithful Performance Bond - 2
day

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. 19107
BOND NO.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, w e hav e hereu nto set our hands, and seal s on this of 2023.

CONTRACTOR SURETY
Contractor Name: Name:

Address: Address:

Telephone No.: Telephone No.:

Print Name: Print Name:

Attorney-in-Fact
Signature: Signature:

Approved as to Form this
day of 2023
City Attorney
City of Jurupa Valley
NOTE: This bond must be executed by both parties. Corporate seal may be affixed hereto.

All signatures must be acknowledged before a notary public (attach acknowledgments). The attorney-in-fact for the corporate surety must be registered, as such, in at least one county in the State of California. (Attach one original Power of Attorney sheet for each bond).
11 Labor and Materials Payment Bond - 1
BOND NO.

PREMIUM $

LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND
(100% of Total Contract Amount)
FEDERAL PROJECT NO. 5487(003)
CITY PROJECT NO. 19107
SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE

KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS
THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, known as "City", has awarded to IE General Engineering, Inc., as Principal hereinafter designated as "Contractor" and have entered into an Agreement whereby the Contractor agrees to construct or install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said Agreement, effective on the date signed by the City Manager, and identified as Project No. 19107, is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, said Contractor under the terms of sai d Agreement is required to furnish a bond to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, materialmen, and other persons, as provided by law; NOW, THEREFORE, we the undersigned Contractor and , as Surety are held and firmly bound unto the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside, in the penal sum of two million two hundred forty-six thousand one hundred ninety-seven dollars, ($2,246,197.00), lawful money of the United States, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Contractor, his or her or its heirs, executors, administrator, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall fail to pay any of the persons described in the State of California Civil Code, Section 9100, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant, or any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Franchise Tax Board from the wages of employees of the Contractor and his or her subcontractors, pursuant to Section 13020, of the Unemployment Insurance Code, with respect to such work and labor, that the Surety or Sureties herein will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In the event suit is brought upon this bond by the City or other person entitled to bring such an action and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney fee to be fixed by the court.

This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons described in the State of California Civil Code Section 9100, to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
12 LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND
PROJECT NO. 19107
Labor and Materials Payment Bond - 2
BOND NO.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands, and seals on this day of 2023.

CONTRACTOR SURETY
Contractor Name: Name:

Address: Address:

Telephone No.: Telephone No.:

Print Name: Print Name:

Attorney-in-Fact
Signature: Signature:

Approved as to Form this
day of 2023
City Attorney
City of Jurupa Valley
NOTE: This bond must be executed by both parties. Corporate seal may be affixed hereto.

All signatures must be acknowledged before a notary public (attach acknowledgments). The attorney-in-fact for the corporate surety must be registered, as such, in at least one county in the State of California. (Attach one original Power of Attorney sheet for each bond).
13 Project No. 19107 SUNNYSLOPE SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE Jurupa Valley, CA
BONDS AND AGREEMENT 14
ATTACHMENT 1
Unmodified Form FHWA-1273 – Revised July 5, 2022, Required Contract Provisions Federal Aid Construction Contracts
1 FHWA-1273 -- Revised July 5, 2022
REQ

UIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS

FEDERAL-AID CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
I. G
eneral
II. Nondiscrimination
III. Non- segregated Facilities
IV. Davis-Bacon and Related Act Provisions
V. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
Provisions
VI. Subletting or Assigning the Contract
VII. Safety: Accident Prevention
VIII. False Statements Concerning Highway Projects
IX. Implementation of Clean Air Act and Federal Water
Pollution Control Act
X. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion
XI. Certification Regarding Use of Contract Funds for
Lobbying
XII. Use of United States- Flag Vessels:

ATTA

CHMENTS
A. Em
ployment and Materials Preference for Appalachian
Development Highway System or Appalachian Local Access
Road Contracts (included in Appalachian contracts only) I. GE
NERAL

1. Fo
rm FHWA-1273 must be physically incorporated in each
construction contract funded under title 23, United States Code, as required in 23 CFR 633.102(b) (excluding
emergency contracts solely intended for debris removal). The contractor (or subcontractor) must insert this form in each subcontract and further require its inclusion in all lower tier subcontracts (excluding purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services). 23 CFR 633.102(e).

The appl
icable requirements of Form FHWA-1273 are
incorporated by reference for work done under any purchase order, rental agreement or agreement for other services. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor or service provider. 23 CFR 633.102(e).

Form
FHWA-1273 must be included in all Federal-aid design-
build contracts, in all subcontracts and in lower tier
subcontracts (excluding subcontracts for design services, purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services) in accordance with 23 CFR 633.102. The design-builder shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor, lower-tier subcontractor or service provider.

Contrac
ting agencies may reference Form FHWA-1273 in
solicitation-for-bids or request-for-proposals documents, however, the Form FHWA-1273 must be physically
incorporated (not referenced) in all contracts, subcontracts and lower-tier subcontracts (excluding purchase orders, rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services related to a construction contract). 23 CFR 633.102(b).

2. Subj
ect to the applicability criteria noted in the following sections, these contract provisions shall apply to all work performed on the contract by the contractor's own organization and with the assistance of workers under the contractor's immediate superintendence and to all work performed on the contract by piecework, station work, or by subcontract. 23 CFR 633.102(d).

3. A br
each of any of the stipulations contained in these
Required Contract Provisions may be sufficient grounds for withholding of progress payments, withholding of final
payment, termination of the contract, suspension / debarment or any other action determined to be appropriate by the contracting agency and FHWA.

4. Sel
ection of Labor: During the performance of this contract, the contractor shall not use convict labor for any purpose within the limits of a construction project on a Federal-aid highway unless it is labor performed by convicts who are on parole, supervised release, or probation. 23 U.S.C. 114(b).

The term Federal-aid highway does not include roadways
functionally classified as local roads or rural minor collectors. 23 U.S.C. 101(a).

II. NON
DISCRIMINATION (23 CFR 230.107(a); 23 CFR Part
230, Subpart A, Appendix A; EO 11246)
The pr
ovisions of this section related to 23 CFR Part 230,
Subpart A, Appendix A are applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related construction
subcontracts of $10,000 or more. The provisions of 23 CFR Part 230 are not applicable to material supply, engineering, or architectural service contracts.

In additi
on, the contractor and all subcontractors must comply
with the following policies: Executive Order 11246, 41 CFR Part 60, 29 CFR Parts 1625-1627, 23 U.S.C. 140, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and related regulations including 49 CFR Parts 21, 26, and 27; and 23 CFR Parts 200, 230, and 633.

The c
ontractor and all subcontractors must comply with: the requirements of the Equal Opportunity Clause in 41 CFR 60-

1.4(b) and, for all construction contracts exceeding $10,000, the Standard Federal Equal Employment Opportunity
Construction Contract Specifications in 41 CFR 60-4.3.

Note: The
U.S. Department of Labor has exclusive authority to
determine compliance with Executive Order 11246 and the policies of the Secretary of Labor including 41 CFR Part 60, and 29 CFR Parts 1625-1627. The contracting agency and the FHWA have the authority and the responsibility to ensure compliance with 23 U.S.C. 140, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and related regulations including 49 CFR Parts 21, 26, and 27; and 23 CFR Parts 200, 230, and 633.

The foll
owing provision is adopted from 23 CFR Part 230,
Subpart A, Appendix A, with appropriate revisions to conform to the U.S. Department of Labor (US DOL) and FHWA
requirements.
2 1. E
qual Employment Opportunity: Equal Employment
O
pportunity (EEO) requirements not to discriminate and to tak
e affirmative action to assure equal opportunity as set forth under
laws, executive orders, rules, regulations (see 28 CFR
P
art 35, 29 CFR Part 1630, 29 CFR Parts 1625-1627, 41 CFR P
art 60 and 49 CFR Part 27) and orders of the Secretary of Labor
as modified by the provisions prescribed herein, and
i
mposed pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 140, shall constitute the EEO and specific affirmative action standards for the contractor's project activities under this contract. The provisions of the A
mericans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et s
eq.) set forth under 28 CFR Part 35 and 29 CFR Part 1630 ar
e incorporated by reference in this contract. In the execution of thi
s contract, the contractor agrees to comply with the
fol
lowing minimum specific requirement activities of EEO:
a. T
he contractor will work with the contracting agency and the F
ederal Government to ensure that it has made every
good faith effort to provide equal opportunity with respect to all of its terms and conditions of employment and in their review of activities under the contract. 23 CFR 230.409 (g)(4) & (5). b. T
he contractor will accept as its operating policy the
fol
lowing statement:
"
It is the policy of this Company to assure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
employment, without regard to their race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, color, national origin, age or disability. Such action shall include: employment,
upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including
apprenticeship, pre-apprenticeship, and/or on-the-job
training."

2. EEO Officer: The contractor will designate and make
k
nown to the contracting officers an EEO Officer who will have the r
esponsibility for and must be capable of effectively
administering and promoting an active EEO program and who m
ust be assigned adequate authority and responsibility to do so.

3. Disse
mination of Policy: All members of the contractor's
staff who are authorized to hire, supervise, promote, and di
scharge employees, or who recommend such action or are
s
ubstantially involved in such action, will be made fully cognizant of and will implement the contractor's EEO policy and contractual responsibilities to provide EEO in each grade and c
lassification of employment. To ensure that the above
agr
eement will be met, the following actions will be taken as a mi
nimum:
a. P
eriodic meetings of supervisory and personnel office
em
ployees will be conducted before the start of work and then not less often than once every six months, at which time the contractor's EEO policy and its implementation will be
reviewed and explained. The meetings will be conducted by the EEO Officer or other knowledgeable company official. b. A
ll new supervisory or personnel office employees will be gi
ven a thorough indoctrination by the EEO Officer, covering all major aspects of the contractor's EEO obligations within thirty days following their reporting for duty with the contractor. c. A
ll personnel who are engaged in direct recruitment for
the project will be instructed by the EEO Officer in the contractor's procedures for locating and hiring minorities and women.
d. Noti
ces and posters setting forth the contractor's EEO
policy will be placed in areas readily accessible to employees, applicants for employment and potential employees.
e. T
he contractor's EEO policy and the procedures to
i
mplement such policy will be brought to the attention of employees by means of meetings, employee handbooks, or
other appropriate means.

4. Recruitment: When advertising for employees, the
c
ontractor will include in all advertisements for employees the notati
on: "An Equal Opportunity Employer." All such
adv
ertisements will be placed in publications having a large c
irculation among minorities and women in the area from
which the project work force would normally be derived. a. T
he contractor will, unless precluded by a valid
bar
gaining agreement, conduct systematic and direct
recruitment through public and private employee referral sources likely to yield qualified minorities and women. To meet this requirement, the contractor will identify sources of potential minority group employees and establish with such identified sources procedures whereby minority and women applicants may be referred to the contractor for employment consideration.
b. In the ev
ent the contractor has a valid bargaining
agr
eement providing for exclusive hiring hall referrals, the contractor is expected to observe the provisions of that agreement to the extent that the system meets the contractor's compliance with EEO contract provisions. Where
implementation of such an agreement has the effect of
discriminating against minorities or women, or obligates the contractor to do the same, such implementation violates Federal nondiscrimination provisions.
c. T
he contractor will encourage its present employees to
r
efer minorities and women as applicants for employment.

Information and procedures with regard to referring such applicants will be discussed with employees.

5. P
ersonnel Actions: Wages, working conditions, and
em
ployee benefits shall be established and administered, and per
sonnel actions of every type, including hiring, upgrading, pr
omotion, transfer, demotion, layoff, and termination, shall be tak
en without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age or disability.

T
he following procedures shall be followed:
a. T
he contractor will conduct periodic inspections of project s
ites to ensure that working conditions and employee facilities do not indicate discriminatory treatment of project site personnel.
b. T
he contractor will periodically evaluate the spread of
wages
paid within each classification to determine any
evidence of discriminatory wage practices.
c. T
he contractor will periodically review selected personnel actions in depth to determine whether there is evidence of discrimination. Where evidence is found, the contractor will promptly take corrective action. If the review indicates that the discrimination may extend beyond the actions reviewed, such corrective action shall include all affected persons.
d. T
he contractor will promptly investigate all complaints of al
leged discrimination made to the contractor in connection with its obligations under this contract, will attempt to resolve such complaints, and will take appropriate corrective action

3 within a reasonable time. If the investigation indicates that the discrimination may affect persons other than the complainant, such corrective action shall include such other persons. Upon completion of each investigation, the contractor will inform every complainant of all of their avenues of appeal.

6. Training and Promotion:

a. The contractor will assist in locating, qualifying, and increasing the skills of minorities and women who are
applicants for employment or current employees. Such efforts should be aimed at developing full journey level status employees in the type of trade or job classification involved.

b. Consistent with the contractor's work force requirements and as permissible under Federal and State regulations, the contractor shall make full use of training programs (i.e., apprenticeship and on-the-job training programs for the geographical area of contract performance). In the event a special provision for training is provided under this contract, this subparagraph will be superseded as indicated in the special provision. The contracting agency may reserve
training positions for persons who receive welfare assistance in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 140(a).

c. The contractor will advise employees and applicants for employment of available training programs and entrance
requirements for each.

d. The contractor will periodically review the training and promotion potential of employees who are minorities and women and will encourage eligible employees to apply for such training and promotion.

7. Unions: If the contractor relies in whole or in part upon unions as a source of employees, the contractor will use good faith efforts to obtain the cooperation of such unions to increase opportunities for minorities and women. 23 CFR 230.409. Actions by the contractor, either directly or through a contractor's association acting as agent, will include the procedures set forth below:

a. The contractor will use good faith efforts to develop, in cooperation with the unions, joint training programs aimed toward qualifying more minorities and women for membership in the unions and increasing the skills of minorities and women so that they may qualify for higher paying employment.

b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to incorporate an EEO clause into each union agreement to the end that such union will be contractually bound to refer applicants without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability.

c. The contractor is to obtain information as to the referral practices and policies of the labor union except that to the extent such information is within the exclusive possession of the labor union and such labor union refuses to furnish such information to the contractor, the contractor shall so certify to the contracting agency and shall set forth what efforts have been made to obtain such information.

d. In the event the union is unable to provide the contractor with a reasonable flow of referrals within the time limit set forth in the collective bargaining agreement, the contractor will, through independent recruitment efforts, fill the employment vacancies without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability; making full efforts to obtain qualified and/or qualifiable minorities and women. The failure of a union to provide sufficient referrals (even though it is obligated to provide exclusive referrals under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement) does not relieve the contractor from the
requirements of this paragraph. In the event the union referral practice prevents the contractor from meeting the obligations pursuant to Executive Order 11246, as amended, and these special provisions, such contractor shall immediately notify the contracting agency.

8. Reasonable Accommodation for Applicants /
Employees with Disabilities: The contractor must be familiar with the requirements for and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and all rules and regulations established thereunder. Employers must provide reasonable
accommodation in all employment activities unless to do so would cause an undue hardship.

9. Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment: The contractor shall not
discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The
contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.

a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors, suppliers, and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract.

b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

10. Assurances Required :

a. The requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 and the State
DOT’s FHWA-approved Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
(DBE) program are incorporated by reference.

b.

The contractor, subrecipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems
appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to:
(1) Withholding monthly progress payments;
(2) Assessing sanctions;
(3) Liquidated damages; and/or
(4) Disqualifying the contractor from future bidding as non- responsible.
c. The Title VI and nondiscrimination provisions of U.S.

DOT Order 1050.2A at Appendixes A and E are incorporated by reference. 49 CFR Part 21.

11. Records and Reports: The contractor shall keep such records as necessary to document compliance with the EEO requirements. Such records shall be retained for a period of three years following the date of the final payment to the contractor for all contract work and shall be available at reasonable times and places for inspection by authorized representatives of the contracting agency and the FHWA.

a. The records kept by the contractor shall document the following:

4 ( 1) T he number and work hours of minority and non-
minority group members and women employed in each work
classification on the project;
(
2) T
he progress and efforts being made in cooperation
wi
th unions, when applicable, to increase employment
opportunities for minorities and women; and
(
3) T
he progress and efforts being made in locating, hiring, tr
aining, qualifying, and upgrading minorities and women. b. T
he contractors and subcontractors will submit an annual report to the contracting agency each July for the duration of the project indicating the number of minority, women, and non- minority group employees currently engaged in each work classification required by the contract work. This information is to be reported on Form FHWA-1391. The staffing data should represent the project work force on board in all or any part of the last payroll period preceding the end of July. If on-the-job training is being required by special provision, the contractor will be required to collect and report training data. The employment data should reflect the work force on board during all or any part of the last payroll period preceding the end of July.

III. NO

NSEGREGATED FACILITIES
T
his provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related construction subcontracts of more than $10,000. 41 CFR 60-1.5.

A
s prescribed by 41 CFR 60-1.8, the contractor must ensure that facilities provided for employees are provided in such a manner that segregation on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin cannot result. The contractor may neither require such segregated use by written or oral policies nor tolerate such use by employee custom. The contractor's obligation extends further to ensure that its employees are not assigned to perform their services at any location under the contractor's control where the facilities are segregated. The term "facilities" includes waiting rooms, work areas, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, restrooms, washrooms, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas,
transportation, and housing provided for employees. The contractor shall provide separate or single-user restrooms and necessary dressing or sleeping areas to assure privacy
between sexes.

IV. DAV

IS-BACON AND RELATED ACT PROVISIONS
This section is applicable to all Federal-aid construction projects exceeding $2,000 and to all related subcontracts and lower-tier subcontracts (regardless of subcontract size), in accordance with 29 CFR 5.5. The requirements apply to all projects located within the right-of-way of a roadway that is functionally classified as Federal-aid highway. 23 U.S.C. 113.

This excludes roadways functionally classified as local roads or rural minor collectors, which are exempt. 23 U.S.C. 101.

Where applicable law requires that projects be treated as a project on a Federal-aid highway, the provisions of this subpart will apply regardless of the location of the project. Examples include: Surface Transportation Block Grant Program projects funded under 23 U.S.C. 133 [excluding recreational trails projects], the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects funded under 23 U.S.C. 117, and National Highway Freight Program projects funded under 23 U.S.C. 167.

The following provisions are from the U.S. Department of Labor regulations in 29 CFR 5.5 “Contract provisions and related matters” with minor revisions to conform to the FHWA- 1273 format and FHWA program requirements.

1. Minimum wages (29 CFR 5.5)
a. A
ll laborers and mechanics employed or working upon
the s
ite of the work, will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the
Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics.

Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits under section 1(b)(2) of the Davis-Bacon Act on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered wages paid to such laborers or mechanics, subject to the provisions of paragraph 1.d. of this section; also, regular contributions made or costs incurred for more than a weekly period (but not less often than quarterly) under plans, funds, or programs which cover the particular weekly period, are deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period.

Such laborers and mechanics shall be paid the appropriate wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed, without regard to skill, except as provided in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(4). Laborers or mechanics performing work in more than one classification may be compensated at the rate specified for each
classification for the time actually worked therein: Provided, That the employer's payroll records accurately set forth the time spent in each classification in which work is performed.

The wage determination (including any additional classification and wage rates conformed under paragraph 1.b. of this
section) and the Davis-Bacon poster (WH–1321) shall be
posted at all times by the contractor and its subcontractors at the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where it can be easily seen by the workers.
b. (1) The contracting officer shall require that any class of
l
aborers or mechanics, including helpers, which is not listed in the wage determination and which is to be employed under the contract shall be classified in conformance with the wage determination. The contracting officer shall approve an additional classification and wage rate and fringe benefits therefore only when the following criteria have been met:
(i)
T
he work to be performed by the classification
r
equested is not performed by a classification in the wage determination; and
(ii) T
he classification is utilized in the area by the
c
onstruction industry; and

5 (iii) The proposed wage rate, including any bona fide fringe benefits, bears a reasonable relationship to the wage rates contained in the wage determination.
(2) If the contractor and the laborers and mechanics to be employed in the classification (if known), or their
representatives, and the contracting officer agree on the classification and wage rate (including the amount
designated for fringe benefits where appropriate), a report of the action taken shall be sent by the contracting officer to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S.

Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210. The
Administrator, or an authorized representative, will approve, modify, or disapprove every additional classification action within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that additional time is necessary.
(3) In the event the contractor, the laborers or mechanics to be employed in the classification or their representatives, and the contracting officer do not agree on the proposed classification and wage rate (including the amount
designated for fringe benefits, where appropriate), the contracting officer shall refer the questions, including the views of all interested parties and the recommendation of the contracting officer, to the Administrator for determination.

The Administrator, or an authorized representative, will issue a determination within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that additional time is necessary.
(4) The wage rate (including fringe benefits where
appropriate) determined pursuant to paragraphs 1.b.(2) or

1.b.(3) of this section, shall be paid to all workers performing work in the classification under this contract from the first day on which work is performed in the classification.
c. Whenever the minimum wage rate prescribed in the
contract for a class of laborers or mechanics includes a fringe benefit which is not expressed as an hourly rate, the contractor shall either pay the benefit as stated in the wage determination or shall pay another bona fide fringe benefit or an hourly cash equivalent thereof.
d. If the contractor does not make payments to a trustee or other third person, the contractor may consider as part of the wages of any laborer or mechanic the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing bona fide fringe benefits under a plan or program, Provided, That the Secretary of Labor has found, upon the written request of the contractor, that the applicable standards of the Davis-Bacon Act have been met. The Secretary of Labor may require the contractor to set aside in a separate account assets for the meeting of obligations under the plan or program.

2. Withholding (29 CFR 5.5)
The contracting agency shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the
Department of Labor, withhold or cause to be withheld from the contractor under this contract, or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally- assisted contract subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements, which is held by the same prime contractor, so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be
considered necessary to pay laborers and mechanics,
including apprentices, trainees, and helpers, employed by the contractor or any subcontractor the full amount of wages required by the contract. In the event of failure to pay any laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice, trainee, or helper, employed or working on the site of the work, all or part of the wages required by the contract, the contracting agency may, after written notice to the contractor, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds until such violations have ceased.

3. Payrolls and basic records (29 CFR 5.5)
a. Payrolls and basic records relating thereto shall be maintained by the contractor during the course of the work and preserved for a period of three years thereafter for all laborers and mechanics working at the site of the work. Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each such worker, his or her correct classification, hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act), daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made and actual wages paid. Whenever the
Secretary of Labor has found under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(iv) that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a plan or program described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis- Bacon Act, the contractor shall maintain records which show that the commitment to provide such benefits is enforceable, that the plan or program is financially responsible, and that the plan or program has been communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics affected, and records which show the costs anticipated or the actual cost incurred in providing such benefits. Contractors employing apprentices or trainees under approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the registration of apprenticeship programs and certification of trainee programs, the registration of the apprentices and trainees, and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the applicable programs.
b. (1) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the contracting agency. The payrolls submitted shall set out accurately and completely all of the information required to be maintained under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i), except that full social security numbers and home addresses shall not be included on weekly transmittals. Instead the payrolls shall only need to include an individually identifying number for each employee (e.g., the last four digits of the employee's social security number). The required weekly payroll information may be submitted in any form desired. Optional Form WH–347 is
available for this purpose from the Wage and Hour Division Web site. The prime contractor is responsible for the
submission of copies of payrolls by all subcontractors.

Contractors and subcontractors shall maintain the full social security number and current address of each covered worker, and shall provide them upon request to the contracting agency for transmission to the State DOT, the FHWA or the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor for purposes of an investigation or audit of compliance with prevailing wage requirements. It is not a violation of this section for a prime contractor to require a subcontractor to provide addresses and social security numbers to the prime contractor for its own records, without weekly submission to the contracting agency. (2) Each payroll submitted shall be accompanied by a
“Statement of Compliance,” signed by the contractor or

6 subcontractor or his or her agent who pays or supervises the payment of the persons employed under the contract and shall certify the following:
(i) That the payroll for the payroll period contains the information required to be provided under 29 CFR

5.5(a)(3)(ii), the appropriate information is being
maintained under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i), and that such
information is correct and complete;
(ii) That each laborer or mechanic (including each
helper, apprentice, and trainee) employed on the contract during the payroll period has been paid the full weekly wages earned, without rebate, either directly or indirectly, and that no deductions have been made either directly or indirectly from the full wages earned, other than
permissible deductions as set forth in 29 CFR part 3;
(iii) That each laborer or mechanic has been paid not
less than the applicable wage rates and fringe benefits or cash equivalents for the classification of work performed, as specified in the applicable wage determination
incorporated into the contract.
(3) The weekly submission of a properly executed
certification set forth on the reverse side of Optional Form WH–347 shall satisfy the requirement for submission of the “Statement of Compliance” required by paragraph 3.b.(2) of this section.
(4) The falsification of any of the above certifications may subject the contractor or subcontractor to civil or criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 31 U.S.C. 231.
c. The contractor or subcontractor shall make the records required under paragraph 3.a. of this section available for inspection, copying, or transcription by authorized
representatives of the contracting agency, the State DOT, the FHWA, or the Department of Labor, and shall permit such representatives to interview employees during working hours on the job. If the contractor or subcontractor fails to submit the required records or to make them available, the FHWA may, after written notice to the contractor, the contracting agency or the State DOT, take such action as may be necessary to
cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds. Furthermore, failure to submit the required records upon request or to make such records available may be grounds for debarment action pursuant to 29 CFR 5.12.

4. Apprentices and trainees (29 CFR 5.5)
a. Apprentices (programs of the USDOL).

Apprentices will be permitted to work at less than the
predetermined rate for the work they performed when they are employed pursuant to and individually registered in a bona fide apprenticeship program registered with the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, or with a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Office, or if a person is employed in his or her first 90 days of probationary employment as an apprentice in such an apprenticeship
program, who is not individually registered in the program, but who has been certified by the Office of Apprenticeship
Training, Employer and Labor Services or a State
Apprenticeship Agency (where appropriate) to be eligible for probationary employment as an apprentice.

The allowable ratio of apprentices to journeymen on the job site in any craft classification shall not be greater than the ratio permitted to the contractor as to the entire work force under the registered program. Any worker listed on a payroll at an apprentice wage rate, who is not registered or otherwise employed as stated above, shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the
classification of work actually performed. In addition, any apprentice performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed. Where a contractor is
performing construction on a project in a locality other than that in which its program is registered, the ratios and wage rates (expressed in percentages of the journeyman's hourly rate) specified in the contractor's or subcontractor's registered program shall be observed.

Every apprentice must be paid at not less than the rate specified in the registered program for the apprentice's level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the journeymen hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination.

Apprentices shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the apprenticeship program. If the
apprenticeship program does not specify fringe benefits, apprentices must be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination for the applicable
classification. If the Administrator determines that a different practice prevails for the applicable apprentice classification, fringes shall be paid in accordance with that determination.

In the event the Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, or a State Apprenticeship Agency
recognized by the Office, withdraws approval of an
apprenticeship program, the contractor will no longer be permitted to utilize apprentices at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is approved.
b. Trainees (programs of the USDOL).

Except as provided in 29 CFR 5.16, trainees will not be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work performed unless they are employed pursuant to and individually registered in a program which has received prior approval, evidenced by formal certification by the U.S.

Department of Labor, Employment and Training
Administration.

The ratio of trainees to journeymen on the job site shall not be greater than permitted under the plan approved by the
Employment and Training Administration.

Every trainee must be paid at not less than the rate specified in the approved program for the trainee's level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the journeyman hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination. Trainees shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the trainee program. If the trainee program does not mention fringe benefits, trainees shall be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination unless the
Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division determines that there is an apprenticeship program associated with the
7 corresponding journeyman wage rate on the wage
deter
mination which provides for less than full fringe benefits for apprentices. Any employee listed on the payroll at a trainee rate who is not registered and participating in a training plan approved by the Employment and Training Administration shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed.

In addition, any trainee performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed.

In the event the Employment and Training Administration withdraws approval of a training program, the contractor will no longer be permitted to utilize trainees at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is approved.
c
. E
qual employment opportunity. The utilization of
appr
entices, trainees and journeymen under this part shall be in conformity with the equal employment opportunity
requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended, and 29 CFR part 30.
d. A
pprentices and Trainees (programs of the U.S. DOT).

Apprentices and trainees working under apprenticeship and skill training programs which have been certified by the Secretary of Transportation as promoting EEO in connection with Federal-aid highway construction programs are not
subject to the requirements of paragraph 4 of this Section IV. 23 CFR 230.111(e)(2). The straight time hourly wage rates for apprentices and trainees under such programs will be
established by the particular programs. The ratio of
apprentices and trainees to journeymen shall not be greater than permitted by the terms of the particular program.

5. Co
mpliance with Copeland Act requirements. The
c
ontractor shall comply with the requirements of 29 CFR part 3, whi
ch are incorporated by reference in this contract as
provided in 29 CFR 5.5.

6. S
ubcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert Fo
rm FHWA-1273 in any subcontracts and also require the
s
ubcontractors to include Form FHWA-1273 in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the c
ompliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all the contract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5.

7. Contract termination: debarment. A breach of
the
c
ontract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5 may be grounds for termination of the c
ontract, and for debarment as a contractor and a
s
ubcontractor as provided in 29 CFR 5.12.

8. Co
mpliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act
r
equirements. All rulings and interpretations of the Davis- Bacon and Related Acts contained in 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 ar
e herein incorporated by reference in this contract as
provided in 29 CFR 5.5.

9. Disp
utes concerning labor standards. As provided in 29
CF
R 5.5, disputes arising out of the labor standards provisions of this contract shall not be subject to the general disputes clause of this contract. Such disputes shall be resolved in ac
cordance with the procedures of the Department of Labor set forth in 29 CFR parts 5, 6, and 7. Disputes within the meaning of this clause include disputes between the contractor (or any of its subcontractors) and the contracting agency, the U.S. Department of Labor, or the employees or their
representatives.

10. Cer
tification of eligibility (29 CFR 5.5)
a. B
y entering into this contract, the contractor certifies that nei
ther it (nor he or she) nor any person or firm who has an i
nterest in the contractor's firm is a person or firm ineligible to be awar
ded Government contracts by virtue of section 3(a) of
the Dav
is-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1).
b. No par
t of this contract shall be subcontracted to any person or
firm ineligible for award of a Government contract by virtue of s
ection 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1). c. T
he penalty for making false statements is prescribed in the U.S
. Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C. 1001.

V. CO

NTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS
ACT
Pursuant to 29 CFR 5.5(b), the following clauses apply to any Federal-aid construction contract in an amount in excess of $100,000 and subject to the overtime provisions of the
Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. These
clauses shall be inserted in addition to the clauses required by 29 CFR 5.5(a) or 29 CFR 4.6. As used in this paragraph, the terms laborers and mechanics include watchmen and guards.

1. O
vertime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor
contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or
involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall
require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any
workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to wor
k in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such l
aborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek. 29 CFR

5.5. 2. V
iolation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated
damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth i
n paragraph 1 of this section, the contractor and any
subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpai
d wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under
contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such Di
strict or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such l
iquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each i
ndividual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and
guar
ds, employed in violation of the clause set forth in
par
agraph 1 of this section, in the sum currently provided in 29 CF
R 5.5(b)(2)* for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard wor
kweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime
wages
required by the clause set forth in paragraph 1 of this section. 29 CFR 5.5.
* $27 as
of January 23, 2019 (See 84 FR 213-01, 218) as may
be adjusted annually by the Department of Labor; pursuant to the F
ederal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990).

8 3. Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages.

The FHWA or the contacting agency shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the
contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime contractor, such sums as may be determined to be
necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph 2 of this section. 29 CFR 5.5.

4. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraphs 1 through 4 of this section and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs 1 through 4 of this section. 29 CFR 5.5.

VI. SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING THE CONTRACT

This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts on the National Highway System pursuant to 23 CFR 635.116.

1. The contractor shall perform with its own organization contract work amounting to not less than 30 percent (or a greater percentage if specified elsewhere in the contract) of the total original contract price, excluding any specialty items designated by the contracting agency. Specialty items may be performed by subcontract and the amount of any such
specialty items performed may be deducted from the total original contract price before computing the amount of work required to be performed by the contractor's own organization (23 CFR 635.116).

a. The term “perform work with its own organization” in paragraph 1 of Section VI refers to workers employed or leased by the prime contractor, and equipment owned or
rented by the prime contractor, with or without operators.

Such term does not include employees or equipment of a
subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor, agents of the prime contractor, or any other assignees. The term may include payments for the costs of hiring leased employees from an employee leasing firm meeting all relevant Federal and State regulatory requirements. Leased employees may only be
included in this term if the prime contractor meets all of the following conditions: (based on longstanding interpretation)

(1) the prime contractor maintains control over the
supervision of the day-to-day activities of the leased
employees;
(2) the prime contractor remains responsible for the quality of the work of the leased employees;
(3) the prime contractor retains all power to accept or exclude individual employees from work on the project; and (4) the prime contractor remains ultimately responsible for the payment of predetermined minimum wages, the
submission of payrolls, statements of compliance and all other Federal regulatory requirements.

b. "Specialty Items" shall be construed to be limited to work that requires highly specialized knowledge, abilities, or equipment not ordinarily available in the type of contracting organizations qualified and expected to bid or propose on the contract as a whole and in general are to be limited to minor components of the overall contract. 23 CFR 635.102.

2. Pursuant to 23 CFR 635.116(a), the contract amount upon which the requirements set forth in paragraph (1) of Section VI is computed includes the cost of material and manufactured products which are to be purchased or produced by the
contractor under the contract provisions.

3. Pursuant to 23 CFR 635.116(c), the contractor shall furnish (a) a competent superintendent or supervisor who is employed by the firm, has full authority to direct performance of the work in accordance with the contract requirements, and is in charge of all construction operations (regardless of who performs the work) and (b) such other of its own organizational resources (supervision, management, and engineering services) as the contracting officer determines is necessary to assure the performance of the contract.

4. No portion of the contract shall be sublet, assigned or otherwise disposed of except with the written consent of the contracting officer, or authorized representative, and such consent when given shall not be construed to relieve the contractor of any responsibility for the fulfillment of the contract. Written consent will be given only after the contracting agency has assured that each subcontract is evidenced in writing and that it contains all pertinent provisions and requirements of the prime contract. (based on long- standing interpretation of 23 CFR 635.116).

5. The 30-percent self-performance requirement of paragraph (1) is not applicable to design-build contracts; however, contracting agencies may establish their own self-performance requirements. 23 CFR 635.116(d).

VII. SAFETY: ACCIDENT PREVENTION

This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts.

1. In the performance of this contract the contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws governing safety, health, and sanitation (23 CFR Part 635).

The contractor shall provide all safeguards, safety devices and protective equipment and take any other needed actions as it determines, or as the contracting officer may determine, to be reasonably necessary to protect the life and health of
employees on the job and the safety of the public and to protect property in connection with the performance of the work covered by the contract. 23 CFR 635.108.

2. It is a condition of this contract, and shall be made a condition of each subcontract, which the contractor enters into pursuant to this contract, that the contractor and any
subcontractor shall not permit any employee, in performance of the contract, to work in surroundings or under conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to his/her health or safety, as determined under construction safety and health standards (29 CFR Part 1926) promulgated by the
Secretary of Labor, in accordance with Section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3704). 29 CFR 1926.10.

3. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.3, it is a condition of this contract that the Secretary of Labor or authorized representative thereof, shall have right of entry to any site of contract performance to inspect or investigate the matter of compliance

9 with the construction safety and health standards and to carry out the duties of the Secretary under Section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3704).

VIII. FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY

PROJECTS

This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts.

In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high degree of reliability on statements and representations made by engineers, contractors, suppliers, and workers on Federal- aid highway projects, it is essential that all persons concerned with the project perform their functions as carefully, thoroughly, and honestly as possible. Willful falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any
misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts, Form FHWA-1022 shall be posted on each
Federal-aid highway project (23 CFR Part 635) in one or more places where it is readily available to all persons concerned with the project:

18 U.S.C. 1020 reads as follows:

"Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or of any State or Territory, or whoever, whether a person, association, firm, or corporation, knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, or false report as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of the material used or to be used, or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to be performed, or the cost thereof in connection with the submission of plans, maps, specifications, contracts, or costs of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation; or

Whoever knowingly makes any false statement, false
representation, false report or false claim with respect to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed or to be performed, or materials furnished or to be furnished, in connection with the construction of any highway or related project approved by the Secretary of Transportation; or

Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false
representation as to material fact in any statement, certificate, or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid Roads Act approved July 11, 1916, (39 Stat. 355), as
amended and supplemented;

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."

IX. IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEAN AIR ACT AND FEDERAL
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT (42 U.S.C. 7606; 2
CFR 200.88; EO 11738)

This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts in excess of $150,000 and to all related
subcontracts. 48 CFR 2.101; 2 CFR 200.326.

By submission of this bid/proposal or the execution of this contract or subcontract, as appropriate, the bidder, proposer, Federal-aid construction contractor, subcontractor, supplier, or vendor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal Highway Administration and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency. 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II.

The contractor agrees to include or cause to be included the requirements of this Section in every subcontract, and further agrees to take such action as the contracting agency may direct as a means of enforcing such requirements. 2 CFR 200.326.

X. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT,

SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY

EXCLUSION

This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts, design-build contracts, subcontracts, lower-tier subcontracts, purchase orders, lease agreements, consultant contracts or any other covered transaction requiring FHWA approval or that is estimated to cost $25,000 or more – as defined in 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200. 2 CFR 180.220 and 1200.220.

1. Instructions for Certification – First Tier Participants:

a. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective first tier participant is providing the certification set out below.

b. The inability of a person to provide the certification set out below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective first tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective first tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such a person from participation in this transaction. 2 CFR 180.320.

c. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the contracting agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the contracting agency may terminate this transaction for cause of default. 2 CFR 180.325.

d. The prospective first tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the contracting agency to whom this proposal is submitted if any time the prospective first tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed
circumstances. 2 CFR 180.345 and 180.350.

e. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred,"
"suspended," "ineligible," "participant," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR Parts 180, Subpart I, 180.900-180.1020, and 1200. “First Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction between a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds and a participant (such as the prime or general contract). “Lower Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction under a First Tier Covered Transaction (such as subcontracts). “First Tier Participant” refers to the participant

10 who has entered into a covered transaction with a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds (such as the prime or general contractor). “Lower Tier Participant” refers any participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a First Tier Participant or other Lower Tier Participants (such as
subcontractors and suppliers).

f. The prospective first tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred,
suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. 2 CFR 180.330.

g. The prospective first tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transactions," provided by the department or contracting agency, entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions exceeding the $25,000 threshold. 2 CFR 180.220 and 180.300.

h. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. 2 CFR 180.300; 180.320, and 180.325. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. 2 CFR 180.335. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any lower tier prospective participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management website (https://www.sam.gov/). 2 CFR 180.300, 180.320, and 180.325.

i. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require the establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause.

The knowledge and information of the prospective participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

j. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph (f) of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default. 2 CFR 180.325.

* * * * *

2. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion – First Tier
Participants:

a. The prospective first tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:

(1) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal
department or agency, 2 CFR 180.335;.

(2) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property, 2 CFR 180.800;

(3) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(2) of this certification, 2 CFR 180.700 and 180.800; and

(4) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. 2 CFR 180.335(d).

(5) Are not a corporation that has been convicted of a felony violation under any Federal law
within the two-year period
preceding this proposal (USDOT Order 4200.6 implementing appropriations act requirements); and

(6) Are not a corporation with any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and
administrative remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability (USDOT Order 4200.6 implementing appropriations act requirements).

b. Where the prospective participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant should attach an explanation to this proposal. 2 CFR 180.335 and 180.340.

3. Instructions for Certification - Lower Tier Participants:

(Applicable to all subcontracts, purchase orders, and other lower tier transactions requiring prior FHWA approval or estimated to cost $25,000 or more - 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200). 2 CFR 180.220 and 1200.220.

a. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below.

b. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous
certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department, or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.

c. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 2 CFR 180.365.

d. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred,"
"suspended," "ineligible," "participant," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR Parts 180, Subpart I, 180.900 – 180.1020, and 1200.

You may contact the person to which this proposal is
11 submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those r
egulations. “First Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction between a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds and a participant (such as the prime or general contract). “Lower Tier Covered Transactions” refers to any covered transaction under a First Tier Covered Transaction (such as subcontracts). “First Tier Participant” refers to the participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a recipient or subrecipient of Federal funds (such as the prime or general contractor). “Lower Tier Participant” refers any participant who has entered into a covered transaction with a First Tier Participant or other Lower Tier Participants (such as subcontractors and suppliers).
e. T
he prospective lower tier participant agrees by
submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this
transaction originated. 2 CFR 1200.220 and 1200.332.
f. T
he prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions exceeding the $25,000 threshold. 2 CFR 180.220 and 1200.220.
g. A
participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a
c
ertification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any lower tier prospective participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management website (https://www.sam.gov/), which is compiled by the General Services Administration. 2 CFR 180.300, 180.320, 180.330, and 180.335.
h. Nothi
ng contained in the foregoing shall be construed to
r
equire establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
i. E
xcept for transactions authorized under paragraph e of
thes
e instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 2 CFR 180.325.
* * * * *
Cer
tification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier
Participants:

1. T
he prospective lower tier participant certifies, by
submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals:
(a)
is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, dec
lared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in c
overed transactions by any Federal department or agency, 2 CF
R 180.355;
(b)
is a corporation that has been convicted of a felony
violation under any Federal law within the two-year period pr
eceding this proposal (USDOT Order 4200.6 implementing
appr
opriations act requirements); and
(c)
is a corporation with any unpaid Federal tax liability that has
been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative r
emedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement wi
th the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability. (US
DOT Order 4200.6 implementing appropriations act
r
equirements)

2. W
here the prospective lower tier participant is unable to c
ertify to any of the statements in this certification, such pr
ospective participant should attach an explanation to this proposal.
* * * * *
XI. CE

RTIFICATION REGARDING USE OF CONTRACT

FUNDS FOR LOBBYING
T
his provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts which exceed
$100,000. 49 CFR Part 20, App. A.

1. T
he prospective participant certifies, by signing and
s
ubmitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
a. No F
ederal appropriated funds have been paid or will be
pai
d, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
b. If any
funds other than Federal appropriated funds have
been pai
d or will be paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.

2. T
his certification is a material representation of fact upon whi
ch reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for
making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31
U.S
.C. 1352. Any person who fails to file the required
c
ertification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and
not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

3. T
he prospective participant also agrees by submitting its bid or proposal that the participant shall require that the l
anguage of this certification be included in all lower tier

12 subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

XII. USE OF UNITED STATES-FLAG VESSELS:

This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts, design-build contracts, subcontracts, lower-tier subcontracts, purchase orders, lease agreements, or any other covered transaction. 46 CFR Part 381.

This requirement applies to material or equipment that is acquired for a specific Federal-aid highway project. 46 CFR 381.7. It is not applicable to goods or materials that come into inventories independent of an FHWA funded-contract.

When oceanic shipments (or shipments across the Great
Lakes) are necessary for materials or equipment acquired for a specific Federal-aid construction project, the bidder, proposer, contractor, subcontractor, or vendor agrees:

1. To utilize privately owned United States-flag commercial vessels to ship at least 50 percent of the gross tonnage (computed separately for dry bulk carriers, dry cargo liners, and tankers) involved, whenever shipping any equipment, material, or commodities pursuant to this contract, to the extent such vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates for United States-flag commercial vessels. 46 CFR 381.7.

2. To furnish within 20 days following the date of loading for shipments originating within the United States or within 30 working days following the date of loading for shipments originating outside the United States, a legible copy of a rated, ‘on-board’ commercial ocean bill-of-lading in English for each shipment of cargo described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section to both the Contracting Officer (through the prime contractor in the case of subcontractor bills-of-lading) and to the Office of Cargo and Commercial Sealift (MAR-620), Maritime
Administration, Washington, DC 20590. (MARAD requires
copies of the ocean carrier's (master) bills of lading, certified onboard, dated, with rates and charges. These bills of lading may contain business sensitive information and therefore may be submitted directly to MARAD by the Ocean Transportation Intermediary on behalf of the contractor). 46 CFR 381.7.

13 ATTACHMENT A - EMPLOYMENT AND MATERIALS
P

REFERENCE FOR APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT

HIGHWAY SYSTEM OR APPALACHIAN LOCAL ACCESS
ROAD CONTRACTS (23 CFR 633, Subpart B, Appendix B)
This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid projects funded under the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965.

1. Dur
ing the performance of this contract, the contractor
undertaking to do work which is, or reasonably may be, done as
on-site work, shall give preference to qualified persons who r
egularly reside in the labor area as designated by the DOL wher
ein the contract work is situated, or the subregion, or the A
ppalachian counties of the State wherein the contract work is situated, except:
a. T
o the extent that qualified persons regularly residing in the ar
ea are not available.
b. F
or the reasonable needs of the contractor to employ
supervisory or specially experienced personnel necessary to assure an efficient execution of the contract work.
c. F
or the obligation of the contractor to offer employment to pr
esent or former employees as the result of a lawful collective bargaining contract, provided that the number of nonresident persons employed under this subparagraph (1c) shall not exceed 20 percent of the total number of employees employed by the contractor on the contract work, except as provided in subparagraph (4) below.

2. T
he contractor shall place a job order with the State
E
mployment Service indicating (a) the classifications of the l
aborers, mechanics and other employees required to perform the contract work, (b) the number of employees required in eac
h classification, (c) the date on which the participant es
timates such employees will be required, and (d) any other pertinent information required by the State Employment
S
ervice to complete the job order form. The job order may be pl
aced with the State Employment Service in writing or by telephone. If during the course of the contract work, the i
nformation submitted by the contractor in the original job order is substantially modified, the participant shall promptly notify the State Employment Servic
e.

3. T
he contractor shall give full consideration to all qualified j
ob applicants referred to him by the State Employment
S
ervice. The contractor is not required to grant employment to any
job applicants who, in his opinion, are not qualified to per
form the classification of work required.

4. If, wi
thin one week following the placing of a job order by
the contractor with the State Employment Service, the State E
mployment Service is unable to refer any qualified job
appl
icants to the contractor, or less than the number
requested, the State Employment Service will forward a
c
ertificate to the contractor indicating the unavailability of appl
icants. Such certificate shall be made a part of the
c
ontractor's permanent project records. Upon receipt of this certificate, the contractor may employ persons who do not nor
mally reside in the labor area to fill positions covered by the c
ertificate, notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraph (1c) above.

5. The provisions of 23 CFR 633.207(e) allow the
c
ontracting agency to provide a contractual preference for the use of mineral resource materials native to the Appalachian region.

6. T
he contractor shall include the provisions of Sections 1 thr
ough 4 of this Attachment A in every subcontract for work which is, or reasonably may be, done as on-site work.

ATTACHMENT 2
Program Supplement Agreement No. T19 Rev. 1 to Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 00511S for Federal Projects
15 2016-28June 16, 2016
for
6/22/2022

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
22118: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ( VTTM) NO. 38258 FOR 35 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.62

ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO
JURUPA DRIVE AND BEACH STREET (APN: 162 -230-014);
(APPLICANT: CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC)

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and consider adopting Resolution No. 2022-03, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38258 AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF 35 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS ON
APPROXIMATELY 2.62 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO JURUPA DRIVE AND BEACH STREET (APN: 162-230-014) In April 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2016 -15 certifying an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Statement of Overriding Conditions, adopting Specific Plan (SP) No. 1402 (Paradise Knolls SP), and approving Gene ral Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 1406, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 36822 to allow the construction of a master planned community consisting of 650 dwelling units, along with commercial, recreational, and open space uses on approximately 107 acres on Limonite Avenue, west of Downey Street, and north of the Santa Ana River.

The Paradise Knolls SP, and TTM subdivided the 107.2 acres into six (6) individual planning areas (low to high-density residential, commercial, and open space) spread out across nine (9) separate lots. Pursuant to the conditions of approval for the Specific Plan,

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

each planning area is to be developed with its own Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP). See Exhibit A for the Paradise Knolls SP Planning Areas.

On September 28, 2022, the Jurupa Val ley Planning Commission approved Master Application (MA) No. 22051 for 118 condominiums at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street (Lot 7 within Planning Area 2 of the Paradise Knolls SP). The Lot 7 project was subsequently appealed to the City Council on October 6, 2022, and was denied by the City Council on November 17, 2022.

On November 9, 2022, the Planning Commission approved MA22118 (this project) for 35 detached condominiums at the northeast corner of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Beach Street. The project was subsequently appealed to the City Council on November 18, 2022. The appeal is attached as Attachment 1. On December 15, 2022, the City Council opened the public hearing, and continued the public hearing to January 19, 2023.

EXHIBIT A – PARADISE KNOLLS SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREAS

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes to construct a residential community consisting of 35 detached condominiums on 2.62 acres of vacant land at the northeast corner of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Beach Street (Lot 9 within Planning Area 2 of Approved Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) (APN: 162-230-012)). The proposed density is 13.4 dwelling units per acre. Although Planning Area 2 includes both Lot 7 and Lot 9, the Applicant processed the two (2) communities under separate applications, each with their own respective Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP). The NDP is an approving document containing details on lot configuration, circulation, architecture, open space, and amenities and

Page | 3

lighting to ensure that the project is developed to be consistent with all of the goals, objectives, guidelines, and development standards set forth in the Paradise Knolls SP.

As previously mentioned, the City Council denied the NDP for Lot 7 on November 17, 2022.

This proposed community on Lot 9 would consist of 35 individual detached condominiums. The unit mix would consist of 22 four- (4) bedroom/2.5 bathroom, and 13 three- (3) bedroom/2.5 bathroom units, and the homes would range in size from 1,572 ft2 to 1,980 ft 2. All buildings would be two (2) stories in height. Residents would own the interior of their individual condominium, along with the airspace above, while the exterior of the homes, and common area would be owned and maintained by the homeowner’s association (HOA). The community would include improvements and amenities including:
a sm all parkette with a seating area; parking in the form of two - (2) car garages for residents and on street for visiting guests; screen walls; extensive landscaping for beautification and privacy screening; decorative street and pedestrian lighting; and decoratively paved entrances with monument signage and pergolas.

The proposed project would require the following entitlement and plan:

1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map: Subdivide existing 2.62-acre project site into seven (7) new lots for detached condominiums, a private street, private courts, and private open space.

2. Neighborhood Development Plan: Develop project to be consistent with all of the goals, objectives, guidelines, and development standards set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP).

EXHIBIT B – LOT 9 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

Page | 4

PROJECT LOCATION AND SURROUNDING AREA
The project site is located within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) at the northeast corner of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Beach Street in the southern area of the City. In the general neighborhood, there are residential, commercial, and institutional uses. The immediate surrounding land uses include vacant land to the north, west, and south, and the single-detached homes to the east.

The nearest pending project is Paradise Knolls Planning Area 5 (proposed 219 single - family units on 31.5 acres). Paradise Knolls Planning Area 1 - “Bridle Path at Paradise Knolls” is currently under construction (107 units on 16.35 acres). See Exhibit C for the site location and nearby surrounding projects.

TABLE 1: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
ACCESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 162-230-014
TOTAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE 2.62
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Highest Density Residential (HHDR) – Up to 25 dwelling units per acre
ZONING CLASSIFICATION Specific Plan (Paradise Knolls Specific Plan)
EXHIBIT C – SITE LOCATION WITH SURROUNDING PROJECTS

Page | 5

PROJECT DESIGN AND SITE LAYOUT
Architecture, Amenities, and Landscaping
The proposed project would provide for high quality residential architecture, private amenities, and extensive landscaping that would provide beautification and privacy screening. The project would incorporate a mix of American farmhouse, California ranch, and Prairie style architecture that adhere to and reinforce the community theme of “River Ranch Trails.” See Exhibit D for architectural elevations. The proposed architecture would be consistent with the residential design guidelines set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) as it would incorpora te: (1) authentic colors to the proposed architectural styles, (2) a mix of materials in transition, (3) recessed doors and windows, (4) gabled roofs, (5) columns, and (6) articulated facades. All buildings would be two (2) stories in height, ranging from 23 to 30 feet tall.

EXHIBIT D – PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE

Page | 6

The proposed project would include amenities such as a small parkette with a flex lawn and shaded seating areas in the center of the community, six (6) on-street parking spaces for visiting guests, pedestrian-oriented street neighborhood lighting that would honor the community theme of “River Ranch Trails,” decorative paving, and monument signs. Visitor parking would be permit only, and enforced through the homeowner’s association (HOA).

One (1) of the visitor -only parking spaces would also be equipped with an electrical vehicle (EV) charging station. See Exhibit E for the proposed parkette.

EXHIBIT E – PROPOSED PARKETTE

The project site would include dense, drought -tolerant landscaping that would both beautify the community, and provide any required screening. The entire perimeter of the community would also be screened by decorative six -foot high block wall. All homes

Page | 7

would have an entrance tree, and private backyards separated by decorative rock -faced vinyl fencing.

Off-Site Improvements, Access, Maintenance
The project site would primarily be accessed from the future signalized intersection of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street, with the sole vehicle entrance/exit being on Persano Street. Residents would have full right -of-way access (left in/out, right in/out) onto Persano Street. There would also be a direct pedestrian -only pathway connection between the project site and Beach Street where residents could enter and exit. The pedestrian connection would be decorated with enhanced landscaping, enriched paving, and a landscaped pergola to exhibit a sense of community pride, and reflect the theme of “River Ranch Trails.” A co mmunity monument sign would provide identification for this pathway as well. See Exhibit F for proposed pedestrian entry.

EXHIBIT F – PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ENTRY

The project site would have a main private street, Lot A of VTTM38258, and the detached condos and garages would be accessed through private courts. The development would include a total of six (6) visitor-only parking in street parking spaces.

The community would be served by several off -site improvements. Limonite Avenue is currently being improved with new landscaped medians, and a new 12 -foot wide multi- purpose trail along the south side of Limonite Avenue, north of the project site.

Beach Street is already constructed to a right -of-way (ROW) width of 98 feet with two travel (2) lanes each way, a landscaped median, and 10-foot wide parkways on both sides with street trees and sidewalks.

Rancho Jurupa Drive and Persano Street are constructed to a full ROW width of 56 feet, with 36 feet of roadway, and 10 -foot wide parkways on both sides for stre et trees and sidewalks. The intersection of Beach Street and Rancho Jurupa Drive is planned to be improved with a mini roundabout for improved traffic circulation, and increased pedestrian and vehicular safety.

Page | 8

All common area, including internal streets, courts, walkways, amenities, and landscaping within the community, would be privately owned and maintained by the HOA. All streetlights would be owned, operated, and maintained by Southern California Edison (SCE). Limonite Avenue, Beach Street, Rancho Juru pa Drive, and Persano Street are publicly owned and maintained through a community facilities district (CFD).

ANALYSIS
I. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. The City of Jurupa Valley has prepared and adopted an Environmental Impact Report for the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP). California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines §15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, allows a previously cert ified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be used as the environmental assessment for a project requiring further discretionary approval if it is determined that the Project currently under review does not propose substantial changes to the previously ado pted or certified CEQA documentation. As the proposed project is entirely within the scope of the approved SP, and adopted and certified EIR, a Previous Environmental Determination (PED) (included in Attachment 2 – Planning Commission Resolution) has been made and prepared for the project.

II. GENERAL PLAN. The project is consistent with the General Plan.

A. Housing Element No Net Loss. The Applicant is proposing to develop Planning Area (PA) 2 – Lot 9 at a lower density than anticipated per the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) at 13.6 dwelling units (du) per acre. PA 2 (Lot 7 and 9) of the SP is designated as Highest Density Residential (HHDR – 20+ du/acre), and Lot 9 has a target of 77 units.

As part of the Housing Element certification process, the City was required to tabulate anticipated densities from incoming projects, and select vacant sites to be re -designated to achieve the densities needed to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goal of 4,497 units to be built over the next eight (8) years. PA 2 of the SP was included in the tabulation at an expected 300 units (28.4 du/acre). As a result of the decreased density, the City would be losing 48 units from the Extremely Low/Very Low Income category, and 26 units from the Low Income category in its adopted Housing Element. If this project is approved, exclusive of Lot 7, the City would be left with a revised buffer of 183 units for the Extremely Low/Very Low Income category, and 29 units for the Low Income category.

B. Land Use Designation.

The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Highest Density Residential (HHDR) that allows over 20 dwelling units (du) per acre. The project demonstrates consistency with the residential section of the Land Use Element, in the General Plan including the following policies:

Page | 9

 LUE 2.1 Residential Development. Accommodate the development of single-family and multi -family residential units in areas appropriately designated by the General Plan, specific plans, the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overla y, and community and town center plans land use maps.

The proposed project is for a residential development on land that has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Highest Density Residential (HHDR).
 LUE 2.2 Higher Density Residential. Accommodate higher density residential development in walkable, pedestrian oriented areas near major transportation corridors, concentrated employment areas, and community and town centers, and promote the development of high quality apartments and condominiums that will enc ourage local investment and pride of ownership.

The proposed project is for a high quality single-family community along a primary transportation corridor in Limonite Avenue. The community would also be walkable, ownership based, and is proposed at a density consistent with the Highest Density Residential (HHDR) land use designation (20+ du/acre).
 LUE 2.3 Infrastructure. Ensure that circulation facilities, water resources, sewer and storm drainage facilities, and other utilities available or provided by the developer are adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses.

All street and trail improvements, drainage infrastructure, and other utilities are found to be adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses, and consistent with the requirements set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP).  LUE 2.6 Buffering. Require setbacks and other design elements to buffer residential units from the impacts of abutting agricultural, roadway, commercial, and industrial uses, to the maximum extent possible.

The development meets the required setbacks set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP), and incorporates design features such as screen walls and dense landscaping to buffer residential units from any potential impacts of abutting uses.
 LUE 2.9 Design Compatibility. Ensure that new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures.

Page | 10

The proposed project successfully incorporates American farmhouse, California ranch, and prairie architectural styles that are compatible with the surrounding area, and are three (3) of the permitted architectural styles pursuant to the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP).  LUE 10.9 Promote Unique Community Character. Use community plans to promote the development and preservation of unique communities in which each community exhibits a special sense of place and quality of design.

The proposed project reinforces the community theme of “River Ranch Trails” through its inclusion of high quality farmhouse, ranch, and prairie architecture, decorative street lighting and landscaping, and enhanced entryways.
 LUE 11.8 Signage. Require development projects to use high quality, well-designed signage that is architecturally integrated with and complementary to the proposed building(s) and adjacent development.

The proposed project would include high quality monument signs at both entrances into the community. The signs would have a decorative stack stone gabion base, and a backlit sign face reading the name of th e community, pursuant to the requirements of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP).
 LUE 13.1 Fair Share Infrastructure Funding. Require that new development contribute its fair share to fund infrastructure and public facilities, such as police and fire fa cilities, parks, streets, and trail improvements.

The applicant would be required to contribute over $245,000 in Development Impact Fees (DIFs) which would be allocated to fund fire services, roads, parks, schools, libraries, and other public facilities.

III. TITLE 7 – SUBDIVISIONS. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 38258 complies with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act for the proposed seven (7) parcels. The Engineering Department has reviewed the Project for required travel lanes, access, circulation, grading, and drainage.

The recommended conditions address areas such as subdivision, circulation, access, grading, drainage, and water quality.

IV. TITLE 9 – ZONING ORDINANCE.

A. Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP). The project site has a zoning classification of Specific Plan (SP) (Paradise Knolls SP). The proposed project meets the intent, permitted uses, and development standards of the Paradise Knolls SP. The project would be providing for a high -density residential community that ge nerate a sense of place, and reinforce the theme of the community. Additionally, the project complies with all applicable Single -Family Detached: Cluster (Garden Court) development standards of the Paradise Knolls SP (Table 2).

Page | 11

TABLE 2: SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED: CLUSTER (GARDEN COURT)

APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD

REQUIRED

MINIMUM

PROJECT COMPLIANCE
Setbacks

Minimum Front Yard –
to main structure

5’ from walkway
All structures would have a
minimum front yard setback
of 5’ from the walkway.

Minimum Corner Side
Yard 5’
All structures would have a
minimum corner side yard
setback of 5’ from the
property line.

Minimum Rear Yard 6’
All stuctures would have a
minimum rear yard setback
of 6’.

Garage Setbacks 2’ max No garage would be setback
more than 2’ from the court.

Side to Side: Between
Structures 10’
There would be a minimum
of 10’ from side to side,
between structures.

Rear to Rear: Between
Structures 15’
There would be a minimum
of 15’ from rear to rear,
between structures.

Other
Height Requirements 35’ max
No structure is proposed to
be taller than 30’ at its
highest point.

Private Open Space 180 ft2
Each home would include a
minimum of 180ft2 of private
open space in back yards.

Off Street Parking
Requirements
2 Spaces/Dwelling
Each home would include a
two- (2) car garage.

Page | 12

B. Inclusionary Housing Requirement (Chapter 9.267). The Applicant submitted the proposed project under Senate Bill (SB) 330 (“Housing Crisis Act of 2019”) which allows an applicant to freeze the applicable fees and development standards that apply to a project at the time of submittal.

Master Application (MA) No. 22118 was submitted on May 18, 2022. As the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was not adopted until in August 2022, the project is not subject to the City’s Inclusionary Housing requirements. The Applicant, however, is volunteering to comply with the requirement in the form of an in-lieu payment. The project’s compliance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance is included as a recommended condition of approval.

V. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION MAP.

Per Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Cod e, “A tentative map shall be denied if it does not meet all requirements of this ordinance, or if any of the following findings are made:”
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
2) That the design or impr ovement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development;
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not phys ically suitable for the proposed density of the development;
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems;
7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternative easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to o nes previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; and
8) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other considerations m ake infeasible the

ATTACHMENT 1:

NOTICE OF APPEAL

ATTACHMENT 2:

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03
-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38258 AND A

NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PERMIT A
SCHEDULE “A” SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.62

ACRES OF REAL PROPER TY LOCATED AT THE

NORTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO JURUPA DRIVE AND
BEACH STREET (APN: 162-230-014) INTO 7 LOTS FOR

DETACHED CONDOMINIUM S, A PRIVATE STREET ,
PRIVATE COURTS, AND OPEN SP ACE; AND MAKING A

DETERMINATION OF EXE MPTION UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15162

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. Century Communities of California, LLC (the “Applicant”) has applied for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258 and a Neighborhood Development Plan (collectively, Master Application No. 22118 or MA No. 22118) to allow the subdivision of approximately 2.62 acres into 7 lots for detached condominiums, a private street, private courts, and open space on real property located at the northeast corner of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Beach Street (APN: 162-230-014) in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan Zone and designated Highest Density Residential (HHDR) (the “Project”).

Section 2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258, a Schedule “A” subdivision of approximately 2.62 acres into 7 lots for detached condominiums, a private street , private courts, and open space on real property located at the northeast corner of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Beach Street (APN: 162-230-014). (b) Section 7.15.090.B of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that whenever a vesting tentative map is filed, it shall be processed in the same manner as a tentati ve map unless modified by S ection 7.15.090, and shall have printed consp icuously on its face the words “Vesting Tentative Map.”
(c) Section 7.05.020.A of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designated as the “Advisory Agency” charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed vesting tentative Schedule “A” maps. Further, Section 7.05.020.A of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
-2-

(d) Consistent with Section 7.15.130.A of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code , the Planning Commission held a duly notice public hearing on the map. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022 -11-09-01 approving the Project.
(e) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires denial of a vesting tentative tract map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. 7) That the design of the proposed lan d division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for ac cess or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a vesting tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Section 3. Neighborhood Development Plan.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of a Neighborhood Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” which Plan would ensure that future development within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan will be consistent with all of the goals, objectives, guidelines, development standards, requirements, and provisions set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan. -3-

(b) Section 9.235.030.B of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that any use permitted within a specific plan shall be subject to the permit requirements specified in the plan.
(c) Section III of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan provides th at the Planning Commission will review and approve, deny, or modify a Neighborhood Development Plan. The City Council has the authority to call up any item that was considered by the Planning Commission for consideration by the City Council. The Project was subsequently requested to be reviewed by the Council for re-consideration
Section 4. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 22118 was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On November 9 , 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 22118, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission regarding the Project.

Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2022-11-09-01 approving MA No. 22118. (c) Pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.05.100.B “An appeal may be filed by an individual Council Member or by the City Council, provided, however, that any such appeal shall be solely on the basis that the issues related to the application are important to the city and should be decided by the entire City Council, and, provided further, that an appeal by an individual Council Member or the Council shall not mean, nor shall it be construed to mean, that the individual Council Member or the City Council is expressing a view in favor of or in opposition to the application. ” Mayor Barajas filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Master Application No. 22118 on November 18, 2022 pursuant to Section 9.05.100.B. (d) On December 15 , 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley opened a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 22118, at which time all person interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council regarding the Project, and continued the public hearing to January 19, 2023.
(e) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 5. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Pursuant California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub. Res.

Code § 21000 et seq.) and Section 15162 of the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff has considered the potential environmental impacts of the Project.

City staff has also reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Paradise Knolls Project certified by the City Council on April 21, 2016, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and prepared a Previous Environmental Document Review -4-

Determination in accordance with CEQA for the Project. Based on that review, the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department has determined that the Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, and tha t the Project does not involve new information of substantial importance which shows that the Project will have significant effects not discussed in the prior FEIR. All potential environmental impacts associated with the Paradise Knolls Project and the Project are adequately addressed by the prior FEIR, and the mitigation measures contained in the prior FEIR will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. (b) The City Council has independently reviewed the Previous Environmental Document Re view Determination, and based upon the whole record before it, the Previous Environmental Document Review Determination, and its independent review and judgment, finds that that the Project is not subject to further environmental review pursuant to the Gui delines because:
1) The Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, and that the Project does not involve new information of substantial i mportance which shows that the Project will have significant effects not discussed in the prior FEIR; and 2) All potential environmental impacts associated with the Paradise Knolls Project and the Project are adequately addressed by the prior FEIR, and the m itigation measures contained in the prior FEIR will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant.
(c) The custodian of records for the prior FEIR, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council determination is based, is the Community Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public review in the Community Development Department located at 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.

Section 6. Findings for Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258 should be granted because:
(a) The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258 meets all requirements of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. (b) The proposed land division will be consistent with the City’s General Plan including policies for the Highest Density Residential (HHDR) land use designati on, in that the proposed land division will facilitate the future construction of thirty five (35) detached condominiums at a density of 13.4 dwelling units per acre, which is below the maximum allowable density in the HHDR land use designation.
(c) The design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with the City’s General Plan in that the design of the subdivision facilitates the development of a residential condominium project, which is an allowed form of development within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan.
-5-

(d) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development in that as it is a relatively flat, undeveloped, vacant lot in close proximity to other existing and planned residential land uses located to the north of Limonite Avenue, east of Persano Street, and south of Rancho Jurupa Drive. The Project site is physically suitable to accommodate the subdivision and future development of thirty five (35 ) detached condominiums as there is adequate water and sewer connections, and other public services are available to the Project site. (e) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development in that it proposes thirty five (35) detached condominiums at a density of 13.4 dwelling units per acre, which is below the maximum allowable density under the General Plan Land Use designation of Highest Density Residential (HHDR – 25 dwelling units per acre). (f) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements i s not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat with the implementation of the recommended Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures.
(g) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan. The EIR determined that although development relate to the Specific Plan could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been required or revisions in the Project have been made or agreed to by the Applicant.
(h) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division in that the development would be in conflict with.

Section 7. Findings for Approval of Neighborhood Development Plan . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find and determine that the Neighborhood Development Plan should be approved because it is consistent with the provisions of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan.

Section 8. Findings for Approval of Master Application No. 22118 with Conditions.
(a) Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Master Application No. 22118 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258 and the Neighborhood Development Plan) to allow the subdivision of approximately 2.62 acres into 7 lots for detached condominiums, a private street , private courts, and open space on real property located at the northeast corner of Rancho Jurupa Drive and Beach Street (APN: 162-230-014), all subject to the conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. (b) As part of the Housing Element certification process, the City was required to tabulate anticipated densities from incoming projects, and select vacant sites to be re-designated to achieve the densities needed to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goal of 4,497 units to be built over the next eight years. The Project site was included in the tabulation at an expected 77 units (28.4 dwelling units per acre ). The Project will be constructing 35 market -6-

rate units. As a result of the decreased density and because the units will be market rate, the City would be losing 48 units from the Extremely Low/Very Low Income category, and 26 units from the Low Income category in its adopted Housing Element. The adopted Housing Element contained a buffer of 231 for the Extremely Low/Very Low Income category, and 55 units for the Low Income category. If this project is approved, the City would be left with a revised buffer of 183 units for the Extremely Low/Very Low Income category, and 29 units for the Low Income category, so it would be losing 48 units in the Extremely Low/Very Low Income category and 55units for the Low Income category.
(c) Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of January, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-7-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 202 3-03, was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of January, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of January, 2023.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

Exhibit A Neighborhood Development Plan
PARADISEKNOLLSSpecific Plan No. 1402Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP) Planning Area 2, Lot 9 VTTM 38258Prepared for: City of Jurupa Valley 8930 Limonite Avenue Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 951-332-6464Developed by:Century Communities 4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-570-2553Prepared by: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services, Inc. 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera Temecula, CA 92591 951-265-54282022

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-i
Table of Contents 1. Project Description 1 a. Overview 1 b. NDP Contents 1 c. Neighborhood Common Characteristics 7 d. Planning Area 2 (PA2) 7 e. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258 (VTTM 38258) and Specific Plan Consistency 7 2. Development Standards/Product Type 8 3. Proposed Architectural Styles for VTTM 38258 10 a. American Farmhouse 10 b. California Ranch 11 c. Prairie 12 4. Landscaping and Streetscapes/Edge Conditions 13 a. Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition 14 b. Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) Neighborhood Commercial PA3 Edge Condition 14 c. Persano Street Streetscape (VTTM 38258) [Formerly Traditional Neighborhood PA1 (MDR)] Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) Edge Condition 15 d. Streetscape and Edge Condition 16 e. Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) PA5 Open Space Recreational Concourse Edge Condition 16 f. 17 g. Internal Courtyard Streetscape 17 h. VTTM 38258 Landscape Plan with Street Trees 18 i. Proposed VTTM 38258 Neighborhood Entry Monumentation 19 j. Proposed VTTM 38258 Community Walls and Fences 21 k. Proposed VTTM 38258 Lighting Options 22 Figures Figure 1, Vicinity Map 3 Figure 2, Specific Plan Area Map 4 Figure 3, Lot Configuration (VTTM 38258) 5 Figure 4, Trail/Sidewalk Plan 6 Figure 5, Single-Family Detached Garden Courts 9 Tables Table 1, Lot Statistics 2 Table 2, Housing Types 2 Table 3, Tabulation of Dwelling Units 2 Table 4, Single-Family Detached Garden Courts 8

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-1

1.Project Description a. Overview The purpose of the Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP) is to ensure that future development within the Specific Plan will be consistent with all the goals, objectives, guidelines, and development standards requirements provisions outlined in Specific Plan No. 1402. The Neighborhood Development Plan shall be approved by the Planning Commission either before, or concurrent with, approval of either a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, or some combination thereof. This NDP shall serve to accompany the current project, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258 (VTTM 38258). VTTM 38258 will be approved only if found to be in conformance with the standards and guidelines outlined in the Specific Plan No. 1402. The Neighborhood Development Plan will be utilized to establish the street pattern, infrastructure, and design characteristics. b. NDP Contents This NDP contains the following information: Area map with project site identified. See Figure 1, Vicinity Map, and Figure 2, Specific Plan Area Map. Proposed lot configuration. See Figure 3, Lot Configuration (VTTM 38258). Lot Statistics (See Table 1, Lot Statistics). Proposed trails and/or sidewalks. See Figure 4, Trail/Sidewalk Plan. Required park locations, types, and acreages. See Figure 3, Lot Configuration (VTTM 38258) and description under item e. in this Section. Summary table of housing types and numbers (See Table 2, Housing Types). The Architectural Styles are contained in Sections 3 and 4 of this NDP. Tabulation of dwelling units per acre (See Table 3, Tabulation of Dwelling Units). Summary table of development standards. Development Standards and Product Types are contained in Section 2 of this NDP. (See Figure 5, Single-Family Detached Garden Courts, and Table 4, Single-Family Detached Garden Courts)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-2
Table 1Lot Statistics LOT STATISTICS LOT NUMBER AREA (SQUARE FEET) AREA (ACRES) DESCRIPTION 1 16,617 0.38 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS/SHARED DRIVEWAY 2 16,454 0.38 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS/SHARED DRIVEWAY 3 16,275 0.38 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS/SHARED DRIVEWAY 4 15,851 0.36 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS/SHARED DRIVEWAY 5 15,959 0.37 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS/SHARED DRIVEWAY 6 15,672 0.36 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS/SHARED DRIVEWAY TOTAL 96,828 2.23 LOT LETTER AREA (SQUARE FEET) AREA (ACRES) DESCRIPTION A 17,129 0.39 PRIVATE ALLEY Table 2 Housing Types Housing Types Size Number of Units American Farmhouse Plan 1 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,636 Square Feet (SF) 4 Plan 2 4 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,918 SF 6 Plan 3 4 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,980 SF 5 Plan 3x 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,702 SF 1 Total Number of Units -- 16 California Ranch Plan 1 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,636 SF 4 Plan 2 4 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,918 SF 6 Total Number of Units -- 10 Prairie Plan 1 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,735 SF 3 Plan 3 4 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,976 SF 5 Plan 3x 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,702 SF 1 Total Number of Units -- 9 Overall Total -- 35 Table 3 Tabulation of Dwelling Units Land Use Gross Acres Number of Dwelling Units Dwelling Units per Acre Highest Density Residential (PA2 Lot 9) 2.6 35 13.5

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-3
Figure 1Vicinity Map

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402NDPFOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-4
Figure 2Specific Plan Area Map

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-5
Figure 3Lot Configuration (VTTM 38258)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-6
Figure 4Trail/Sidewalk Plan

INTERNAL SIDEWALKS DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL IN OPEN SPACE PUBLIC SIDEWALKS

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-7
c. Neighborhood Common Characteristics Although the design and mix of residential types within the overall Specific Plan may vary by neighborhood and by location, PA2 is required to have the following characteristics: Attractive, green, walkable streets/paths that provide a safe environment for pedestrians, bicyclists, and children. A private recreational area is required. Comfortable walking and biking access to a neighborhood commercial center with basic commercial amenities such as shops, markets, and restaurants. d. Planning Area 2 (PA2) The following information was taken from Specific Plan No. 1402 as it applies to PA2: PA2, in its entirety, provides for the development of 10.4 acres with a target of 300 dwelling units and a target of 20+ dwelling units per acre. PA2 is located at the main Project entry (at the intersection of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street). Approximately 2.6 acres are located southerly of PA3. The remaining acres are located southerly of Limonite Avenue, westerly of the main Project access, and easterly of the California/Nevada Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee (JATC) facility. Attractive, walkable streets shall provide a safe path for pedestrians and bicyclists to amenities, adjoining neighborhoods, and/or the neighborhood commercial center (PA3). Provide some orientation to the street and will provide linkages to the private and public open space/recreation, pedestrian networks, and commercial uses. Private recreation facilities will be provided, for the sole use of its residents. e. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38258 (VTTM 38258) and Specific Plan Consistency The following highlights VTTM 38258 consistency with Specific Plan No. 1402 and this NDP: VTTM 38258 provides for the development of approximately 2.6 acres with 35 dwelling units and a density of approximately 13.5 dwelling units per acre. VTTM 38258 is located southerly of Limonite Avenue, easterly of the main Project access, and westerly of PA1. Vehicular access to VTTM 38258 shall be provided from Persano Street. Attractive, walkable streets provide a safe path for pedestrians and bicyclists to private and public amenities, adjoining neighborhoods, and/or the neighborhood commercial center (PA3). Primary pedestrian access to and from VTTM 38258 is provided by sidewalks along Persano Street, which also allow access to Beach Street and Rancho Jurupa Drive. VTTM 38258 residents have convenient access to the Recreational Concourse south of Rancho Jurupa Drive in PA5. Proposed architectural styles based on approved styles in Specific Plan. An open space recreational area is provided in the southwest area of the site (0.056 acres). Additionally, recreation facilities are provided within the westerly portion of PA2 under VTTM 38257 (0.13 acres). There will be a shared use and maintenance agreement between the VTTM 38257 and VTTM 38258; VTTM 38258 residents shall have access to these facilities. Street parking is provided.

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-8

2. Development Standards/Product Type The following Development Standards and Product Types are proposed for VTTM 38258: Single-Family Detached: Cluster (Garden Courts) Please reference Table 4, Single-Family Detached Garden Courts, and Figure 5, Single-Family Detached Garden Courts for Development Standards and Product Type details. Table 4 Single-Family Detached Garden Courts Development Standards Designation/ Use Single-Family Detached: Cluster (Garden Court) Planning Area 5 Lot Dimensions (minimum) Minimum Lot Width Setbacks (minimum) Minimum Front Yard to main the structure Minimum Corner Side Yard Minimum Interior Side Yard Minimum Rear Yard Garage Setbacks max Side to Side: Between Structures Rear to Rear: Between Structures Other (maximum) Maximum Structural Height Minimum Private Open Space 180 sq. ft. Encroachments (fireplaces, AC units, media centers) 1 1

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-9
Figure 5Single-Family Detached Garden Courts Proposed Per VTTM 38258 Pedestrian Entry Enlargement (785 SF) Open Space Area Enlargement (0.056 Acres) 1 Expanded Pedestrian Community Entry 1 Flex Lawn 2 Overhead Structure and Bench Seating 2 Enhanced Planting 3 Enhanced Planting 3 Overhead Structure and Picnic Table 4 Community Signage 4 Bench Seating Open Space Area
Pedestrian Entry
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-10

3. Proposed Architectural Styles for VTTM 38258a. American Farmhouse

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-11
b. California Ranch

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-12
c. Prairie

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-13

4. Landscaping andStreetscapes/Edge Conditions The following landscape components from Specific Plan No. 1402 shall apply to VTTM 38258. 3 Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition SP Figure V-31 4 Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) Neighborhood Commercial PA3 Edge Condition SP Figure V-39 5 Traditional Neighborhood PA1 (MDR) - Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) Edge Condition SP Figure V-36 6 Adjacent to PA5 Concourse Streetscape and Edge Condition SP Figure V-29 7 Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) PA5 Open Space Recreational Concourse Edge Condition SP Figure V-41 Neighborhood Entry Monumentation SP Figure V-22

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402NDPFOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-14
a. Beach Street Entry Streetscape Edge Condition (per VTTM 38258)Per City Engineering Department there is no access/entry required from Beach Street. b. Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) - Neighborhood Commercial PA3 Edge Condition (VTTM 38258 Landscape Plan Sections B & C)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-15
c. Persano Street Streetscape (VTTM 38258) [Formerly Traditional Neighborhood PA1 (MDR)] Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) Edge Condition (VTTM 38258 Landscape Plan Section D) Due to the configuration of the approved tract map for PA1, there is now no direct edge condition adjacent to PA1.

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-16
d. Rancho Jurupa Drive (formerly ) Adjacent to PA5 Concourse Streetscape and Edge Condition e. Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) PA5 Open Space Recreational Concourse Edge Condition (VTTM 38258 Landscape Plan Section E)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402NDPFOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-17
f.- Streetscape (per VTTM 38258)
g. Internal Courtyard - Streetscape (per VTTM 38258)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-18
h. VTTM 38258 Landscape Plan with Street Trees (created per SP Guidelines)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-19
i. Proposed VTTM 38258 Neighborhood Entry Monumentation Key Map

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-20

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-21
j. VTTM 38258 Community Walls and Fences (created per SP Guidelines) Legend

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 NDP FOR VTTM 38258 PAGE-22
k. Proposed VTTM 38258 Lighting Options

Exhibit B Previous Environmental Determination (PED)
Previous Environmental Determination Paradise Knolls Specific Plan No. 1402 Master Application (MA) No. 22118 Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 38258 Lead Agency City of Jurupa Valley 8390 Limonite Avenue Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 Contact: Kumail Raza, Senior Planner (951) 332-6464 ext.252 [email protected] Project Proponent: Century Communities of California, LLC 4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300 Newport Beach, CA. 92660 September 13, 2022

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 2 1.0 DETERMINATION Based on the evaluation in Section 4.0 of this document, I find that all potentially significant effects have been avoided or mitigated according to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), State Clearinghouse (SCH) #2014051049), City of Jurupa Valley Master Application (MA) No. 14115, certified on April 21, 2016. Therefore, previously certified EIR. According to PRC §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162, CEQA does not require the preparation of any further environmental review. City of Jurupa Valley Signature Lead Agency Joe Perez, Community Development Director September 13, 2022 Printed Name/Title Date 2.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (PED) Once an environmental impact determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has been approved or certified for a project, no further action is required unless further discretionary approval for that project is required. CEQA Guidelines §15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, allows a previously certified EIR or adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) to be used as the environmental assessment for a project requiring further discretionary approval if it is determined that the Project currently under review does not propose substantial changes to the previously adopted or certified CEQA documentation that would: 1) Create one or more new significant impacts. 2) Create impacts that are more severe. 3) Require major revisions to the CEQA document. This PED has been prepared to determine if the request is within the scope of the analysis contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) SCH #2014051049, City of Jurupa Valley Master Application (MA) No. 14115, certified on April 21, 2016, and to ensure that by approving the request for Master Application (MA) No. 22118, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38258, the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously. (See Table 1: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures) MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 3 The previously certified FEIR is on file with the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, and is hereby incorporated by reference according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 38258 for 35 detached condominiums within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (PKSP) Planning Area 2 (PA2) Lot 9 on approximately 2.62 acres. The proposed VTTM will have a residential density of approximately 13.5 du/ac. The Project site is located on the northeast corner of Beach Street and Rancho Jurupa Drive, west of Persano Street, and south of Limonite Avenue, and is identified by the following Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 162-230-014. 4.0 ANALYSIS Previously Identified Environmental Impacts The FEIR determined that the previously approved PKSP would result in no impacts or less than significant environmental impacts under the following issue areas: Mineral Resources, Public Services and Facilities, and Recreation and Parks. The FEIR determined that the previously approved PKSP would result in potentially significant impacts to Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources (archaeological), Geological Resources (paleontological), Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Utilities and Service Systems. With mitigation each issue area impacts were determined to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The FEIR determined that the previously approved PKSP would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to Aesthetics, Air Quality, Land Use/Planning, Population and Housing, and Transportation and Traffic. Current Environmental Impacts When the PKSP was approved in 2016, the Project site was owned and operated by the Paradise Knolls Golf Course and included an 18-hole golf course, club house, maintenance buildings, and grounds keeper residence. Portions of the PKSP area are under construction. The Project site (PA2) is in an area south of Limonite Avenue, north of Rancho Jurupa Road and the Santa Ana River with future development of Lot 7 of PKSP PA2 and Beach Street to the east, with single-family residential developments to the north and east. Because construction has not occurred on PA2, the physical conditions identified for PA2 in 2016 remain the same.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 4 Applicability of the 2016 Certified FEIRIf the request for VTTM38258 is approved, the Project will incorporate the following as required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with the PKSP FEIR: Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project- based on federal, state, or local law currently in place, which effectively reduce environmental impacts. The PPPs are listed in the MMRP attached to the FEIR. Mitigation Measures (MM) These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance with the provisions of CEQA. The MMs are summarized below in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures Environmental Topic/Threshold Mitigation Measures (MM) Required to Reduce Impact Level of Significance Aesthetics Visual Character: The proposed project will have a significant impact on scenic resources by removing the existing golf course and constructing a mixed-use residential and commercial development that will substantially change views and the character of the site. MM- 4.1.6.1A: Visual Renderings: Prior to the issuance of any building permit for development under the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan, the developer shall provide a plot plan or site plan, landscaping plan, and visual rendering(s) that accurately illustrate the appearance of the proposed development. The renderings shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the proposed project is consistent with the design guidelines of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan, City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, and Municipal Code as applicable. The location and number of view presentations shall be at the discretion of the City Planning Department. Significant and unavoidable. Light and Glare: Development of the project site would introduce substantial new sources flight and glare into the project area from street lighting, parking lots, and security light and nighttime traffic, as well as landscaping lighting. MM- 4.1.6.2A: Light Management Plan: The project developer of the City to minimize light intrusion into neighborhoods to the east and north of the project site. A major restriction to be incorporated into the LMP will be to preclude or at least minimize any lights directed to the east, south or north anywhere on the site. Any lights oriented in those directions shall be elevated and directed down to the greatest extent feasible to minimize visual me activities (e.g., the onsite commercial center). The LMP will include City contact numbers for local residents to contact City officials if lighting systems do not comply with the restrictions outlined in the LMP. Failure of users/uses to adhere to the requirements of the LMP will be cause for revocation of their use permit(s) and/or cancellation of their event. Significant and unavoidable.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 5 MM - 4.1.6.2B: Landscape Buffer: As part of the project landscaping plan, the project developer shall provide massed plantings of trees of various types along the boundaries of the site to help reduce potential spillover of light and soften views onto the site from adjacent conservation areas. Agriculture and Forestry Resources Conversion of Farmland to Non-Agricultural Uses: The NRCS defines some of the soils onsite as prime soils if drained and irrigated. The specific plan also includes a Zone Change (ZC) that would convert the zoning from Agriculture to Specific Plan which would allow the construction of residential and commercial land uses. MM - 4.2.6.1A: Community Farm: Prior to issuance of any discretionary permits for development within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan property, the developer shall offer to dedicate a minimum of one acre of land within the Specific Plan to the City access and water supply. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Division in consultation with the Riverside County Farm Bureau as appropriate. Less than significant. Air Quality Short-Term Construction Related Emissions: Based on the model outputs, NOX emissions will be above the regional threshold across all three construction phases. Application of SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 will ensure than fugitive dust impacts are less than significant. Model outputs show that the emissions of the pollutants on the peak day of construction will result in concentrations of pollutants at these nearest residences MD thresholds of significance. MM - 4.3.6.1A: Daily Grading: The project shall require that the site preparation and grading contractors limit the daily disturbed area to 5 acres or less. MM - 4.3.6.1B: Construction Equipment: The project shall require that the construction contractor use construction equipment that have Tier 4 final engines, level 3 diesel particulate filters (DPF), with oxidation catalyst that impart a 20% reduction. Less than significant. Long-Term Project Operational Emissions: Modeling output show that when all phases are complete, the project would exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds for VOC and operational emission rates would not exceed the LST for receptors at 25 meters. MM - 4.3.6.2A: Exceed 2013 Title 24 Residential Standards: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall demonstrate compliance with 2013 Title 24 Residential Standards, which are at least 25 percent more efficient than Title 24 Part 6 energy efficiency standards, and that it meets Green Building Code Standards. MM - 4.3.6.2B: Low Flow Fixtures: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall require all faucets, toilets, and showers utilize low-flow fixtures such that indoor water demand is reduced by 20 percent. MM - 4.3.6.2C: Water-Efficient Irrigation: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall require a water-efficient irrigation system be installed that reduces water demand by at least 6.1 percent. Significant and unavoidable.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 6 MM - 4.3.6.2D: ENERGY STAR Appliances: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall require that ENERGY STAR appliances be installed in new homes. MM - 4.3.6.2E: Recycling Program: Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, the developer shall demonstrate the project will implement a recycling program that reduces waste to landfills by a minimum of 50 percent and 75 percent by 2020. MM - 4.3.6.2F: Energy-Efficient Lighting: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall demonstrate that all lighting in proposed structures uses an average of 5 percent less energy than conventional lighting (see also MM 4.3.6.2B for guidelines). MM - 4.3.6.2G: New Trees: Prior to issuance of building permits, project landscaping plans shall indicate that at least 2 trees per residential unit are planted for each phase of development (project total minimum 1,300 trees). These trees can be either relocated from the existing golf course or planted new. Air Quality Management Plan Consistency: The proposed uses would result in more traffic than currently allowed or planned uses (i.e., open space) generate. The proposed land uses are not consistent with the General Plan land use designation and so is not consistent with the SCAG RCP Guidelines and the SCAQMD AQMP. There are no feasible mitigation measures. Significant and unavoidable Cumulative Air Quality Impacts: -term daily operational VOC emissions would exceed the thresholds; therefore, the proposed project would contribute to significant long-term cumulative air quality impacts. There are no feasible mitigation measures Significant and unavoidable Endangered and Threatened Species: Because of the proximity of the project to the Santa Ana River and potential habitat for endangered and threatened species, the project is subject to Guidelines pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands Interface for the management of edge MM - 4.4.6.1C: Invasive & Non-native Plants: Prior to issuance of any building permits, landscaping plans shall demonstrate that invasive, non-native plant species shall not be used as landscaping materials on the site. Table 6-2 of Volume 1 of the MSHCP (Plants That Should Be Avoided Adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area) lists the plants that shall be avoided. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director. MM - 4.4.6.1F: Focused Surveys: Prior to issuance of any occupancy permits, per MSHCP Section 6.1.2, Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools, Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 7 effects as presented in Volume 1, Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP. willow flycatcher, and/or western yellow-billed cuckoo and will be affected by the project, including any offsite equestrian facility, focused surveys shall be conducted according to currently accepted protocols. If any of these species is determined to be present, per MSHCP Section 9 at least 90 percent of the occupied portions of the site that provide for the long-term conservation value for the identified species shall be conserved in a manner consistent with conservation of the species found to be present onsite. This would include 100 meters (300 feet) of undeveloped landscape adjacent to the conserved habitat. Although not stated in Section 9, if 90 percent cannot be conserved onsite, offsite mitigation that is biologically equivalent or superior would be required MM - 4.4.6.1G: Consultation with US Army Corp of Engineers: A Section 7 consultation will be required if a USACE permit is required to authorize impacts to USACE jurisdictional waters. The project MSHCP Consistency Document incorrectly indicated that the project was not in designated USFWS critical habitat for critical habitat for LBV and Santa Ana sucker occurs within the Santa Ana River, portions of which briefly transect the southeast corner of the project site but are completely avoided by the project. If the project requires issuance of a permit from a federal agency such as the USACE, a Section 7 Consultation pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) may be required. If the project can avoid impacts to USACE waters and a USACE permit is therefore not required, FESA compliance, if necessary, would likely occur pursuant to the MSHCP (a USFWS Section 10a permit under FESA) in the event effects to LBV cannot be avoided. If the USACE determines, through a biological assessment or other review, that the issuance of a permit to is likely to adversely affect a listed species, the USACE will submit to the USFWS a request for formal consultation. During formal consultation, the USFWS and USACE share information about the proposed project and the species likely to be affected. Formal consultation may last up to 90 days, after which the USFWS will prepare a biological opinion on whether the proposed activity will jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species which generally requires a minimum of an additional 45 days to issue. Candidate, Non-listed Sensitive, or Special-Status Species: The proposed project would affect sensitive species through removal of vegetation onsite as well as cause offsite effects to riparian forest habitat communities. MM - 4.4.6.2A: Migratory Birds: Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the California Fish and Game Code (CFGC), site preparation activities (removal of trees and vegetation) shall be avoided during the nesting season of potentially occurring native and migratory bird species. The nesting season is January 15th through August 31st. Any construction activities that occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors) in the trees and shrubs will require that all potential habitat be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 8 before commencement of clearing. If any active nests are detected, then a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete as determined by the biological monitor to minimize impacts. In the event such species are identified within the limits of ground disturbance, Mitigation Measure 4.4.6.4B shall also apply. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Division. The period between September 1st to January 14th is considered outside the nesting season and site preparation and construction activities during this time would not be subject to nest surveys and monitoring as described above. MM - 4.4.6.2B: Nesting Surveys: If it is determined that project-related grading or construction will affect nesting special status avian species, no grading or heavy equipment activity shall take place within the limits established in Mitigation Measure 4.4.6.1A until it has been determined by a qualified biologist that the nest/burrow is no longer active, and all juveniles have fledged the nest/burrow. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Division. MM - 4.4.6.2C: Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Survey: To ensure direct mortality of burrowing owls is avoided, a pre-construction survey will be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance at the site. The pre-construction survey shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and submitted to the City. This survey shall be required and conducted no more than 30 days prior to initiation of ground-disturbing activities. If construction is to be initiated during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) and burrowing owl is determined to occupy any portion of the study area during the 30-day pre-construction survey, consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) shall take place and no construction activity shall take place within 500 feet of an active nest/burrow until it has been determined that the nest/burrow is no longer active and all juveniles have fledged the nest/burrow. No disturbance to active burrows shall occur without appropriate permitting through the USFWS and/or CDFW. If occupied burrowing owls are identified in a development area, the burrows shall be avoided, if feasible. If it is not feasible to avoid the burrows, consultation with the Department will be necessary prior to relocating owls or compromising the burrows, and a Burrowing Owl Relocation Plan may be developed with approval from the Wildlife Agencies and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority. To avoid active nests adequately, no grading or heavy equipment activity shall take place within 250 feet of an active nest during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) and 160 feet during the non-breeding season. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 9 Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive Natural Communities: The proposed project would affect riparian habitat through the discharge of water from drainage facilities into adjacent waters MM - 4.4.6.3A: Deed Riparian/Riverine Area for Pyrite Creek:Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that 0.29 acres of Riparian/Riverine Area present onsite has been conserved in perpetuity by a qualified conservator such as the County of Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) or other approved conservation entity. This will mitigate for the loss of 0.145 acres (2:1 ratio) of such habitat to Pyrite Creek from project-related improvements along Limonite Avenue. MM - 4.4.6.3B: Deed Riparian/Riverine Area for Santa Ana River: Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that up to 5.555 acres of Riparian/Riverine Area present onsite has been conserved in perpetuity by a qualified conservator such as the County of Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) or other approved conservation entity. All Riparian/Riverine Areas located on the project site, including 3.195 acres of Southern Cottonwood/Willow Riparian Forest and 2.36 acres of the Santa Ana River will be avoided by the proposed project. The long-term preservation mechanism such as a restrictive covenant or conservation easement, shall include a restriction that access to these areas will not be allowed either by project residents or the general public.

Less than significant.

Jurisdictional Waters/Wetlands: The project is also within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB. Under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, the RWQCB must certify that the discharge of dredged or fill material into Waters of the United States does not violate Federal, State, and local water quality standards. MM - 4.4.6.4A: Lake and Streambed Alteration: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The following shall be incorporated into the permitting, subject to approval by the regulatory agencies. 1:1 onsite or no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts. The applicant shall also restore any onsite or offsite temporary impact Offsite mitigation may occur on land acquired for the purpose of in perpetuity preservation, or through the purchase of mitigation area. Less than significant. Habitat Fragmentation /Wildlife Movement: The project would significantly fragment habitat or restrict wildlife movement within the project area and along Pyrite Creek. Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.4.6.1A through 4.4.6.1G and 4.4.6.4A. Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 10 Adopted Policies and/or Ordinances: Compliance with policies OS 9.3 and 9.4 require reuse of the existing trees on the golf course to the extent practical. The existing golf course site contains hundreds of trees of various sizes and various species. The loss of these trees could be a potentially significant impact to area biological resources (e.g., nesting birds). MM - 4.4.6.6A: Tree Preservation and Relocation Plan: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall provide a Tree Preservation and Relocation Plan prepared by a certified arborist to identify how and where the existing trees with the highest likelihood of survival shall be conserved onsite, either by preservation in place or relocation. This plan shall be consistent with the Tree Inspection Follow-Up Report prepared for the project (DEIR Appendix E). MM - 4.4.6.6B: Implementation of Tree Preservation and Relocation Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for each phase or tract map, the developer shall demonstrate that existing trees outlined in the Tree Preservation and Relocation Plan (see Mitigation Measure 4.4.6.6A) have been either preserved in place or relocated within the phase or tract, as shown in the landscaping plan, to the extent practical. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director in consultation with the applicant and the project arborist. Less than significant. Adopted habitat Conservation Plans: The project site is located along an approximately 3,400-foot-long reach of the Santa Ana River and contributes to reserve assembly of MSHCP Criteria Area Core A. Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.4.6.1A through 4.4.6.1G and 4.4.6.3A and 4.4.6.3B. Less than significant. Cumulative Biological Resources Impacts: The proposed project could have significant impacts to biological resources. Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.4.6.1A through 4.4.6.1G, 4.4.6.2A through 4.4.6.2C, 4.4.6.3A and 4.4.6.3B, and 4.4.6.6A through 4.4.6.6C. Less than significant. Cultural Resources Archeological Resources: The proposed project has the potential to affect known or previously undetected subsurface archaeological resources. MM - 4.5.6.2A: Archaeological Monitoring Agreement: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley that a Cultural Resources Monitoring Agreement has been secured for qualified Tribal representatives, and that a professional archaeological monitor meeting Secretary of Interior standards has been retained by the Applicant to conduct monitoring of all mass grading and trenching activities and has the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist and Tribal representatives shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City and contractors to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring program. MM - 4.5.6.2B: Native American Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley that appropriate Native American representative(s), Project Archaeologist, and the Tribal representative(s) shall be allowed to monitor and have Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 11 received a minimum of 30 days advance notice of all mass grading and trenching activities. During grading and trenching operations, the Tribal representatives and the project archaeological monitor shall observe all mass grading and trenching activities per the Cultural Resources Monitoring Agreement. If the Tribal representatives suspect that an archaeological resource may have been unearthed, the archaeologist, in consultation with the tribal representative, shall immediately halt and redirect grading operations in a 100-foot radius around the find to allow identification and evaluation of the suspected resource. In consultation with the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the archaeological monitor shall evaluate the suspected resource and make a determination of significance pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. MM - 4.5.6.2C: Treatment and Preservation Plan for Archaeological Resources: If a significant archaeological resource(s) is discovered on the property, ground disturbing activities shall be suspended 100 feet around the resource(s). The archaeological monitor and representatives of the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the Project Applicant, and the City Planning Department shall confer regarding mitigation of the discovered resource(s). A treatment plan and/or preservation plan shall be prepared and by the archaeological monitor and reviewed by representatives of the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the Project Applicant, and the City Planning Department and implemented by the archaeologist to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all archaeological artifacts that are of Native American origin found on the Project site to the culturally affiliated Native American tribe(s) for proper treatment and disposition. A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City Planning Department, the appropriate Native American tribe(s), and the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. All cultural material, excluding sacred, ceremonial, grave goods and human remains, collected during the grading monitoring program and from any previous archaeological studies or excavations on the project site shall be curated, as determined by the treatment plan, according to the current professional repository standards and may include a Gabrieleno Tribe curatorial facility. MM - 4.5.6.2D: 100-Foot Radius Protection for suspected Archaeological resources: Prior to grading permit issuance, the City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities and the archaeological monitor or Tribal representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 12 the find and call the project archaeologist and the Tribal representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find." Paleontological Resources: The project site is underlain by Holocene alluvium that overlies Pleistocene alluvial sediments. The Pleistocene Alluvium beneath the project site does have the potential to yield paleontological resources. MM - 4.5.6.3A: Paleontological Monitoring: Excavation of areas identified as likely to contain palaeontologic resources, such as any undisturbed subsurface Pleistocene sediments, will be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor. If paleontological resources (fossils) are discovered during project grading, work will be halted in that area until a qualified paleontologist can assess the significance of the find. The project paleontologist shall monitor remaining earthmoving activities at the project site and shall be equipped to record and salvage fossil resources that may be unearthed during grading activities. The paleontologist shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert grading equipment to allow recording and removal of the unearthed resources. Any fossils found shall be evaluated in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines and offered for curation at an accredited facility approved by the City of Jurupa Valley. A report of findings, including, when appropriate, an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance, should be prepared upon completion of the steps outlined above. The report and inventory, when submitted to the appropriate lead agency, would signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts on palaeontologic resources. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department.

Less than significant.

Cumulative Cultural and Paleontological Resources: Implementation of the proposed project and related off-site improvements would require measures to identify, recover, and/or record any cultural and/or paleontological resource that may occur within the project limits. Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.5.6.1, 4.5.6.2A through 4.5.6.2D, and 4.5.6.3A. Less than significant. Geology and Soils Seismic related ground failure: The site has a low to moderate susceptibility to lateral displacement in the southwest portion of the site, and the southern portion of the site may be susceptible to differential settlement from liquefaction. MM - 4.6.6.1A: Geotechnical Assessment Recommendations: The developer shall follow the recommendations of the geotechnical assessment conducted by Leighton and Associates, Inc. These recommendations include 1) over excavating the near-surface soils in the southern portion of the site to a depth of 15 feet or the depth where groundwater is encountered, whichever is shallower, and 2) providing stiffened foundations, as described in Section 3.2 of the geotechnical report. In addition, seismic settlement damage potential in the south-central portion of the site shall be mitigated by placing two geogrid layers within the compacted fill under the proposed structures. Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 13 Unstable Soil: The project site contains wet, soft soils that are weaker than overlying driers soils and are potentially unstable. The project site soils are also severely corrosive to ferrous metals. MM - 4.6.6.2A: Stabilization Measures:If wet soils are encountered during grading, the developer shall use the stabilization measures suggested in the geotechnical report, such as working large, angular broken concrete, asphalt concrete, or rocks, with a maximum size of 12 inches, into the excavation bottom until the bottom is firm. This material must be placed such that the material is not nested and voids are not created between particles. In addition, wet soils shall be dried back or mixed with sufficient drier soil prior to being placed as compacted fill. As an alternative, geogrid material may also be used with crushed rock to stabilize soft wet bottoms. This measure and any alternative methods of achieving safe stabilization shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. MM - 4.6.6.2B: Consultation with Corrosion Engineer: Prior to issuance of building permits and placement of underground utilities within the project, the developer shall consult with a corrosion engineer. Non-ferrous buried pipe, or ferrous pipe protected by dielectric tape, polyethylene sleeves and/or other methods, shall be used as recommended by the engineer. underground utility subcontractors. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Less than significant.

Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The project will produce 9,314 MT of CO2e/yr. which are threshold of 3,000 MMTCO2e/yr. Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.3.6.2A through 2H. Less than significant. Cumulative Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change Emissions: The project projected emissions screening thresholds. Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.3.6.2A through 2H. Less than significant. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Onsite Conditions Involving Hazardous Materials: The project may be significantly affected by onsite contamination by hazardous materials. MM - 4.8.6.1C: Monitoring of Remediation Activities: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a qualified professional shall be retained to observe remediation activities on identified features of concern or areas of possible contamination such as, but not limited to, the presence of underground facilities, buried debris, waste drums, tanks, soil staining, or odorous soils. Further investigation and analysis may be necessary should such materials be encountered during grading and/or construction activities. MM - 4.8.6.1D: Discovery of Suspected Hazardous Materials During Construction: If any areas of contaminated soil or other suspected hazardous materials are found during grading, work shall be halted in that area until a qualified hazmat professional Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 14 can be retained to evaluate the find and determine the mostappropriate remediation and disposal of any hazardous materials. The grading contractor shall notify the City within 24 hours of discovering any suspected hazardous materials and shall inform the City as to the planned remediation of the material prior to initiating cleanup activities. Contaminated soil or other materials shall be transported and disposed of following established procedures by a licensed contractor, and appropriate sampling and testing shall be done to determine if all contaminated soil has been removed. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. Hydrology and Water Quality Operational-Related Water Quality Impacts: During the operational phase of any urban use, the major source of pollution in storm water runoff will be contaminants that have accumulated on the land surface over which runoff passes. MM - 4.9.6.1A: Maintenance of Onsite Water Quality Basins: The Home Owners Association (HOA) and all property owners shall be responsible to maintain all onsite water quality basins according to requirements in the guidance Water Quality Management Plan and/or subsequent site-specific Water Quality Management Plans, and established guidelines of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Failure to properly maintain such basins shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of discretionary operating permits, and/or referral to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for review and possible action. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Land Development Division, in consultation with the City Engineer, and Regional Water Quality Control Board. MM - 4.9.6.1D: Groundwater: Prior to the issuance of any discretionary permit, the developer shall demonstrate to the City that locally derived groundwater from onsite wells will NOT be used on the project site, including for potable purposes, for irrigating any landscaped areas, or for irrigating any open space areas where human contact with groundwater may occur. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department and Public Works Director as appropriate.

Less than significant.

Land Use and Planning Conflict with Land Use Plans, Policies, or Regulations (Regional): The proposed project is not consistent with . No feasible mitigation available Significant and unavoidable Cumulative Land Use and Planning Impacts: This project will contribute to an ongoing imbalance of jobs to housing in this area, both now and in the future. No feasible mitigation available Significant and unavoidable MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 15 Noise Short-term Construction Noise Impacts: Due to the proximity of adjacent residential land uses, construction noise impacts are potentially significant and mitigation is required. MM - 4.12.6.1A: Construction Noise Reduction Plan: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Construction Noise Reduction Plan (CNRP) to the City for review and approval. The CNRP shall show how construction noise impacts will be limited near occupied residential dwellings. The CNRP shall include but not be limited to: (1) During all project site excavation and grading, contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with (2) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment at least 300 feet away from the closest sensitive receptors to the project site (i.e., the single-family residences east of the site). (3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and the closest noise-sensitive receptors to the project site (i.e., the single-family residences east of the site). (4) During all project site construction within a quarter mile of an inhabited dwelling, the construction contractor shall limit all construction-related activities to between the hours of 6:00 am to 6:00 pm on weekdays and Saturday during the months of June through September, and 7:00 am to 6:00 pm on weekdays and Saturday during the months of October through May. No construction shall be permitted on Sundays or any federal holiday. (5) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. (6) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. (7) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. MM - 4.12.6.1B: Notice of Construction: Prior to the start of any construction-related activity on the site, the project developer shall post a notice at the project entrance at Limonite Avenue that is clearly visible to area residents. The notice shall give the name and telephone number of the construction superintendent or other responsible person to whom residents can report excessive noise or other nuisance conditions on the project construction site. The sign shall be removed within 10 days of the completion of the last phase of project development. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department.

Less than significant.

Long-term Noise Impacts: The project would be adding sensitive receptors (residential) to an area that exceeds a noise level of 65 dBA. The project does propose a sound wall along Limonite MM - 4.12.6.2A: Final Acoustical Study: Prior to issuance of building permit for each phase of development, the developer shall submit final acoustical studies based on actual building design and placement. The supplemental studies shall identify required wall weight and placement of noise control barrier (soundwall) along Limonite Avenue to ensure compliance to the Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 16 Avenue that according to Federal Highway Administration noise assessment guidelines could reduce the estimated noise noise level would still be greater than 65 dBA. required to have a weight that is at least 3.5 pounds per square foot of face area without decorative cutout or line-of-site openings between the shielded area and the project site. Noise control barriers maybe constructed using one, or any combination of the following material: a. Masonry block; b. Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), or one-inch-thick tongue and groove wood or sufficient weight per square foot; c. Glass (1/4 thick), or other transparent material with sufficient weight per square foot; or d. Earthen berm with landscaping. A noise barrier must present a solid face from the top to bottom. Preventable openings or decorative cutouts should not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking to avoid flanking. In addition, supplemental acoustical studies shall require additional noise attenuation measures such as window glazing and mechanical ventilation if the proposed sound barrier does not sufficiently reduce the level of noise to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. As outlined in General Plan Policy N 8.6, any future exterior noise assessments shall use Level of Service C for traffic, and be based on designed road capacity or 20-year projection of development (whichever is less). Population and Housing Consistent with General Plan Growth Policies: The project would not be consistent with Plan growth policies because it contributes to a continued imbalance of jobs to housing in the region. No feasible mitigation available. Significant and unavoidable Population Growth: The project would induce an unplanned increase in the population and the project would significantly increase population in a job poor-housing rich area. No feasible mitigation available. Significant and unavoidable Cumulative Population and Housing Impacts: The project would contribute to substantial unanticipated population growth and is not consistent with regional goals related to jobs/housing balance as it proposes new unanticipated housing in a housing rich area. No feasible mitigation available. Significant and unavoidable Transportation and Traffic MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 17 Conflict with Applicable Circulation Plan and Traffic and Level of Service: The proposed project is generally consistent with General Plan goals and targets related to traffic, it will not maintain acceptable LOS and is therefore inconsistent with the General Plan. MM - 4.16.6.2B: Onsite Circulation System:Prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit for each phase of the project, the following onsite improvements are required and shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: (a) Construct an onsite circulation system per the detailed site plan and consistent with the Specific Plan Circulation Plan. Provide project access roadways to Limonite Avenue and Downey Street. Install stop signs, stop bars, and stop legends at all project access points on Downey Street. Install a traffic signal at the project access point on Limonite Avenue. Install equestrian crossings and MM - 4.16.6.2C: Safe Site Distances: Prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit for each tract within the Specific Plan, development shall provide adequate and safe sight distances at each project access and intersection within the project. A minimum of 275 feet of corner sight distance is required at each project access point on Downey Street. A limited use area shall be maintained where a clear line of sight can be established. The limited use area shall be used for the purpose of prohibiting or clearing obstructions to maintain adequate sight distance at intersections. The limited use area is to be kept clear of all obstructions, including vegetation to the degree practical. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Significant and unavoidable.

Cumulative traffic Impacts: Potential short-term and long-term cumulative traffic-related impacts cannot be reduced to less than significant levels because the City does not have authority or control over all of the affected transportation facilities. Specifically, the City does not have control over the I-15 Freeway ramps for Limonite Avenue. No feasible mitigation available. Significant and unavoidable Utilities and Service Systems Water Supply and Construction or Expansion of Water Treatment Facilities: The project water demand of 233.3 acre-feet per year would be within the existing JCSD available supply even with restrictions on imported water. The proposed project would therefore not require the construction of new water treatment facilities or MM - 4.17.1.6.1A: Reduction in Water Use: A Prior to issuance of building permits, project landscaping, irrigation, and building plans shall demonstrate the project achieves at least a 28 percent consistent with State-mandated water conservation goals, in consultation with the Jurupa Community Service District. MM 4.17.1.6.1B: Annexation for Project Area outside of JCSD Boundaries: Prior to issuance of the first building permit for any portion of project development that is located outside of Jurupa into the Jurupa Community Services District for the purpose of Less than significant.

MA 22118 Previous Environmental Determination September 13, 2022 18 expansion of existing facilities. However, a portion of the project would be outside the JCSD boundary and was not considered by the WSA. water and sewer service. The Project Proponent shall submit evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley that the property has been annexed in the form of a certified copy of the resolution adopted a subsequent submittal of the appropriate Local Agency Formation Commission certification. Cumulative Impacts to Water Supply Services: A portion of the project is outside the JCSD boundary and was not considered by the WSA. Based demand is cumulatively significant. Refer to Mitigation Measures: 4.17.1.6.1A and 4.17.1.6.1B. Less than significant. Construction Expansion of Electric and Natural Gas Facilities: The proposed project would substantially increase the demand for both electricity and natural gas, which could cause the construction or expansion of electrical and natural gas facilities in the project area. Refer to Mitigation Measures: 4.4.6.2B, 4.4.6.2E, 4.4.6.G, and 4.4.6.2H from Air Quality Section. Less than significant Cumulative Impacts to Energy Facilities: The proposed project would potentially contribute to a cumulatively significant increase in demand for electricity and natural gas. Refer to Mitigation Measures: 4.4.6.2B, 4.4.6.2E, 4.4.6.G, and 4.4.6.2H from Air Quality Section. Less than significant Conclusion: The Project site remains substantially in the same physical condition as it was in 2016, except that development is taking place in the immediate vicinity consistent with the FEIR. The Project is required to comply with the existing PPPs and MMs per Resolution Number 2016-15 certifying the FEIR. Based on the preceding analysis, the request for MA22118, and VTTM38258 is within the scope of the analysis contained in the FEIR and the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously.

Exhibit C Conditions of Approval
PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 9 (MA22118) REVISED: OCTOBER 20, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38258)

Page 1 of 14 ends
← All documents from this meeting