Page - 1 -
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, June 15, 2023
Closed Session: 6:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
2. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATION OF
LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to five matters of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.
B. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.
C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.
D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
Page - 2 -
the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and the City Council w ill decide whether to initiate litigation.
3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS I N CLOSED
SESSION
4. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
5. INVOCATION
6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
8. PRESENTATIONS
A. QUARTERLY UPDATE – HEALTHY JURUPA VALLEY
B. QUARTERLY UPDATE – JURUPA VALLEY CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
9. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
10. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and add ress for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954 .2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.
Page - 3 -
11. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS
1. UPDATE ON THE JOINT MEETING OF THE WESTERN
RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE AND SUPPORTIN FOUNDATION MEETING OF
JUNE 5, 2023
2. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COMMITTEE
MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2023
B. MAYOR PRO TEM GUILLERMO SILVA
1. UPDATE ON THE NORTHW EST MOSQUITO AN D VECTOR
CONTROL DISTRICT MEETING OF JUNE 15, 2023
C. COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE ALTAMIRANO
1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2023
D. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON
1. UPDATE ON THE NORTHWEST TRANSPORTATION NOW
COALITION MEETING OF JUNE 8, 2023
2. UPDATE ON THE METROLINK / SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY – AUDIT AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 9, 2023
3. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2023
4. UPDATE ON THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION
REDUCTION REVIEW COM MITTEE MEETING OF JU NE 1 5,
2023
12. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. JUNE 1, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
Page - 4 -
14. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In acc ordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY
MANTAINED STREET SYSTEM FOR TRACT MAP 36391 RIVERBEND
LOCATED ON 68 TH STREET BETWEEN PATS RANCH ROAD AND
DANA AVENUE (LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.)
1. Requested Action: That the City Council a dopt Resolution No. 2023 -40, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
(TRACT MAP 36391 RIVERBEND LOCATED ON 68 TH STREET
BETWEEN PATS RANCH ROAD AND DANA AVENUE )
PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 1806
2. Authorize the City Manager to record the Notice of Completion; and
3. Direct the City Engineer to release the Labor and Materials and Performance Bonds for the street improvements and the Monument Bond.
C. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-41, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, ESTABLISHING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023 -24 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Page - 5 -
D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2022 AND MARCH 31, 2023 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023
Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file the quarterly investment reports for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 quarter ending December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023.
E. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWE EN THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY AND CIVICA LAW GROUP, A PC, FOR ON -
CALL LEGAL SERVICES
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the First Amendmen t to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Civica Law Group, APC (CIVICA) formerly known as Silver and Wright LLP for On -Call Legal Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
F. AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES WITH THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services with the County of Riverside through the Sheriff’s Department for a term of five (5) years, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
G. CONSIDERATION OF ANIMAL FIELD AND SHELTER SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement for Animal Field and Shelter Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and the County of Riverside; and
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form submitted to the City Council.
H. APPROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND ST C TRAFFIC, INC. FOR ON-CALL TRAFFIC
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc. for On -Call Traffic Engineering Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
Page - 6 -
I. ADOPTION OF THE LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-42, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS F OR
FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
J. ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE OF A STORM DRAIN LINE OVER
PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE APPALOOSA DEVELOPMEN T (TR
37714) (FORESTAR (USA) REAL ESTATE GROUP INC.) ; NORTH OF
VAN BUREN BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF THE UNION PACIFIC
RAILROAD, NW CORNER OF APN 163-400-046
1. Requested Action: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of an easement for the purp ose of accessing the storm drain line over private property, as described on the Grant of Easement (DED22 -006) attached to the staff report.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED22-006.
K. AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN AND APPROVAL OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF FIRE
RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES (FORMERLY FDAC EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS AUTHORITY)
1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023 -43, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN AND
APPROVING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT
EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE RISK
MANAGEMENT SERVICES JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
2. Authorize the C ity Manager, or designee, to executive all documents pursuant to the proposed agreement, including the ability to make minor non-substantive changes.
Page - 7 -
L. INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO: 1) AMEND TABLE 2 -4 ‘SUMMARY OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS’ TO ADD MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES; 2)
AMEND TABLE 2-5 ‘GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND CONSISTENT ZONE DISTRICTS’ TO CORRECT INACCURACIES; AND 3) MAKE OTHER MINOR EDITS AND CORRECTIONS
Requested Action: That the City Council initiate a General Plan Technical Amendment to: 1) amend Table 2 -4 ‘Summary of General Plan Land Use Designations’ to add minimum residential densities; 2) amend Table 2 -5 ‘General Plan Land Use Designations and Consistent Zone Districts’ to correct inaccuracies; and 2) make other minor edits and corrections.
M. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS REGARDIN G THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LA NDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1 CONSOLIDATED (JV L&LMD NO. 89-1-C) – CITYWIDE
1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023 -47, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING
THE PREPARATION OF T HE ENGINEER’S REPORT
REGARDING PROPOSED A SSESSMENTS TO BE LEV IED AND
COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023- 24 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21 , 34, 61, 73, 78, 95 , 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M , N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; DD, EE, FF, II AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F AND 2-G OF
CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y LANDSCAPE AND LIGH TING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1- CONSOLIDATED
PURSUANT TO THE LAND SCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF
1972
2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-48, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y
DECLARING ITS INTENT ION TO LEVY AND COLL ECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; DD, EE, FF, II AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F AND 2 -G OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY LANDSCAPING A ND LIGHTING MAINTENA NCE
DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO TH E
LANDSCAPING AND LIGH TING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE
MAINTENANCE AND SERV ICING OF LANDSCAPING , MULTI-
Page - 8 -
PURPOSE TRAILS, FENC ING, FOSSIL FILTERS, BIO-SWALES,
GRAFFITI ABATEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BRIDGE LIGHTS,
AND STREET LIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24; AND GIVING
NOTICE OF AND SETTIN G THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING ON TH E ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND
ORDERING NOTICE OF T HE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE
PUBLISHED
15. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FR OM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
16. PUBLIC HEARING
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEAL NO. 23001: MINOR
CHANGE NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37211 (TTM37211M1), A REQUEST TO MODIFY CONDITION NO. 3.15 REGARDING ELECTRICAL
LINE UNDERGROUNDING ALONG PACIFIC AVENUE AND DETERMINE
THAT NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162(a); LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CANAL STREET AND OPAL STREET (APNS: 177 -130-007 & 177 -142- 018); (APPLICANT: SEQUANATA PARTNERS, LP)
1. Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and consider the following alternatives:
a. Sustain the Planni ng Commission’s decision and adopt Resolution No. 2023-44, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY AFFIRMING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DECISION TO DENY MINOR CHANGE
NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37211
(TTM37211M1) WHICH REQUESTED THE DELETION OF
CONDITIONS NOS. 1.12 AND 2.15 REGARDING
ESTABLISHING A CFD FOR LANDSCAPING AND WATER
QUALITY MANAGEMENT FEATURES, AND CONDITION
NO. 3.15 REGARDING THE UNDERGROUNDING OF
UTILITY LINES ALONG PACIFIC AVENUE, AND
DETERMINING THAT NO F URTHER CEQA REVIEW IS
REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15162
b. Approve the appeal to the Planning Commission decision and proceed with the implementation of the alternative remedy proposed by the staff. This alternative entails the specific requi rement of undergrounding utilities exclusively along the frontage of the
Page - 9 -
property. As a result, staff will prepare a drafted resolution for the City Council's consideration at the upcoming Regular meeting.
17. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the proposed Operating Budget for the 202 3/24 fiscal year, as initially presented May 1 8, 202 3, which includes Council approved changes at the Workshop.
2. That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2023-45, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A BUDGET AND
APPROVING INITIAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024
B. FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 YEAR-END BUDGET AMENDMENTS
Requested Action: That the City Council approve Fiscal Year 202 2-23 Year-End Budget Amendments to the City’s Budget as presented in the exhibit to the staff report.
C. APPROVAL OF ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 -2024, INCLUDING THE 3% COST OF LIVING
ADJUSTMENT
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) of 3%, effective the first pay period in July 2023, requiring that eligible employees are required to be active on payroll at the time the COLA takes effect; and
2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-46, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION SALARY SCHEDULE
INCLUDING THE 3% COLA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1,
2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024
18. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
19. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
20. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Page - 10 -
21. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of July 6, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.
Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.A
-1-
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
June 1, 2023
1. 5:30 PM – CALL TO ORDER - JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
CALL TO ORDER – CITY COUNCIL:
● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
CALL TO ORDER – PLANNING COMMISSION:
● Laura Shultz, Chair
● Penny Newman, Chair Pro Tem
● Hakan Jackson, Planning Commissioner
● Arleen Pruitt, Planning Commissioner
● Yesenia Villagomez, Planning Commissioner
Mayor Chris Barajas called the joint study session to order at 5:32 p.m.
An announcement was made that Spanish translation services are available for those needing an interpreter.
2. JOINT STUDY SESSION
A. PEDLEY TOWN CENTER AREA PLAN
Staff Report presented by Jean Ward, Project Manager, Peter Vanderwal, Managing Principal with Sargent Town Planning, and Jason Pack , representing Fehr & Peers. Ms. Ward provided a review and recap of the previous study session that was held on March 2, 2023. She reported that tonight’s study session will review community input including input from Study Session #1 and review and confirm refined concepts before starting the Draft Plan. Ms. Ward gave an overview of the “why” of the Plan which is to prepare for physical improvements to address the following goals: public safety, healthy living and walkability, economic development, quality of life, environmental sustainability, and identify community character. Ms. Ward outlined the purpose of the visioning and strategic plan, noting that this is a plan, not a project as it will direct how the area will be designed and developed in the future. Mr. Pack provided information on traffic impacts and concepts and projects which are already underway or planned , which
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
will mitigate traffic congestion. Mr. Vanderwal provided some of the refined concepts and ideas for the future of the Pedley Town Center.
Following discussion, members of the City Council and Planning C ommission received and file d the staff presentation on the Pedley Town Center Plan and provided input and direction.
3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
Mayor Chris Barajas called the regular meeting to order at 7:18 p.m.
4. INVOCATION was given by Imam Shaw from the Islamic Center of Jurupa Valley.
5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was given by Council Member Leslie Altamirano
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve the Agenda.
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
7. PRESENTATIONS
A. PRESENTATION OF M EMORIAL PLAQUE IN HO NOR OF DEPUTY SHERIFF ISAIAH CORDERO – PRESENTED BY SUPERVISOR KAREN
SPIEGEL
Supervisor Karen Spiegel introduced Gilbert Cordero, the father of Deputy Sheriff Isaiah Cordero. She thanked Mr. Cordero for his son’s sacrifice in the line of duty.
In Deputy Cordero’s honor, she unveiled a memorial wooden plaque to honor the memory of Deputy Cordero who was killed during a traffic stop in Jurupa Valley.
Mayor Chris Barajas and members of the City Council thanked Ms. Spiegel for her presentation. They conveyed condolences to Mr. Cordero , noting that Deputy Cordero will be remembered for his service and sacrifice. -3-
B. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES -
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
The City’s Pet of the Month for June, a one-year old male Pug named “Waldo” was introduced to the Council. Anyone interested in giving this available pet a home is invited to contact the City’s Animal Control Services Department at https://www.rcdas.org.
C. CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITU TE OF INLAND SOUTHER N CALIFORNIA –
PRESENTED BY SABRINA GONZALEZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Sabrina Gonzalez, gave a presentation on the Civil Rights Institute of I nland Southern California, noting that she is originally from the community of historic Mira Loma. She provided an overview of their programs and services, their diversity center, and their mission which is to honor unsung civil rights heroes from the region.
Council Member Armando Carmona thanked Ms. Gonzalez for her presentation and encouraged members of the community to visit the Civil Rights Institute.
8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Roberto Ramirez referred to tonight’s earlier study session on the Pedley Town Center, asking whether there were any plans to assist existing business owners to be part of the new vision in keeping with their historic and equestrian uses.
Laura S hultz, repres enting the Jurupa Valley Pro Rodeo Committee, thanked the City Council for their support in bringing back the rodeo this year. She announced that the Jurupa Valley Pro Rodeo will take place on June 9 and 10 at the Rick Thompson Arena.
Gates open at 5:00 pm and the rodeo starts at 7:00 pm.
9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva asked staff to review the response from the City’s mobile application: “My Jurupa Valley.” He reported that residents h ave complained that when they submit a request on the platform, they receive a response that the request is “closed.” Council Member Armando Carmona indicated that a resident submitted a request for a bulky item pickup from Burrtec and the item was not pic ked up at the scheduled date and time. He asked if staff could follow up with Burrtec on this matter. He recognized Claudette Muro Avila who is a student at Mira Loma Middle School who was selected to compete at the Conade National Championships in Mexico for Escaramuza. He announced a community clean up event this Saturday at 7:00 am on the Bain Street trails in partnership with the Riverside County Regional Park and Open -Space District . He expressed congratulations to all the graduates from the local schools. He announced that local resident A nna Lee , a six -year old , who was just promoted from Kindergar ten will be -4-
hosting a walk to increase public awareness about Type 1 Diabetes. The walk will take place on June 10 at 8:00 am, beginning at the Felspar Arena. He thanked some of the local veterans who joined him over the Memorial Weekend at the Santa Ana River.
10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON
1. Council Member Brian Berk son gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority meeting of May 26, 2023.
2. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Southern California Association of Governments Transportation Committee meeting of June 1, 2023.
B. COUNCIL MEMBER ARMANDO CARMONA
1. Council Member Armando Carmona gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission – Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee meeting of May 22, 2023.
11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
City Manager Ro d B utler reminded residents that Senator Richard Roth will hold a Community Mobile Home meeting on Saturday, June 3, at 10:00 am at the City Council Chamber. A panel of experts will answer questions and provide information on the Mobile Home Residency La w Protection Program in California. Attendees are encouraged to RSVP by calling (951) 680-6750 or by email at: [email protected] He reminded Council that should they have vacation plans during the s ummer months to let him know for scheduling purposes.
He provided an update on the Interagency Coordinating Council meeting held May 19, 2023.
A. AB 1234 REPORT ON ME ETINGS ATTENDED AT P UBLIC EXPENSE –
CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ANNUAL MUNICI PAL SEMINAR
AND INTERNATIONAL CONFE RENCE OF SHOPPING CE NTERS
(ICSC)
Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager, gave a report on the attendance of Mayor Pro Tem Silva, and Council Members Altamirano, Berkson, and Carmona at the California Contract Cities Annual Municipal Seminar from 5/18 – 5/21. Expenses for the meeting included travel and accommodations. Meals were provided at no additional cost. Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Silva and Council Members -5-
Altamirano and Berkson attended the ICSC Conference from 5/21 – 5/23.
Expenses for the meeting included travel and accommodations. Some, but not all meals were provided at no additional cost.
B. PRESENTATION REGARDI NG A GRANT TO HELP ADDR ESS
HOMELESSNESS IN THE SANTA ANA RIVERBED
Amy Sells, Principal Management Analyst , provided information on two County of Riverside grants that will help address homelessness in the Santa Ana Riverbed.
12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. MAY 18, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, s econded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve the Minutes of the May 18, 2023 regular meeting.
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
13. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE R EADING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
B. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-09
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-09, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ADDING CHAPTER 11.100, MISCELLANEOUS, AND SECTION 11.100.010, JUMPING FROM STRUCTURES OR ROCKS PROHIBITED; EXCEPTIONS, TO THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE
-6-
C. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$5,489,839.38
Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check r egisters dated April 27 and May 4, 11, and 18, 2023 as well as the payroll registers dated April 28 and 30 and May 12, 2023.
D. CONSIDERATION OF A R ESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE REPORT
OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE FEES AND INITI ATING THE
PROCEEDINGS TO MAKE DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE
COLLECTION SERVICES FEES A SPECIAL ASSES SMENT AND LIEN
AGAINST CERTAIN PARC ELS OF PROPERTY SITU ATED WITHIN
THE CITY AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 20, 2023 (BURRTEC SOLID WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.) – REMOVED FROM
THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-34, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECEIVING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT
ACCOUNTS FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES PRO VIDED BY BURRTEC
SOLID WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SETTING THE PUBLIC
HEARING FOR ESTABLISHING A LIEN ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN
THE AMOUNT OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES
DUE FROM THE PROPERTIES
E. CONSIDERATION OF A R ESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE REPO RT
OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE FEES AND INITI ATING THE
PROCEEDINGS TO MAKE DELINQUENT SOLID WAS TE
COLLECTION SERVICES FEES A SPECIAL ASSES SMENT AND LIEN
AGAINST CERTAIN PARC ELS OF PROPERTY SITU ATED WITHIN
THE CITY AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 20, 2023 (USA WASTE OF CALIFO RNIA, INC.) – REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-35, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECEIVING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT
ACCOUNTS FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES PROVIDED BY USA
WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING
FOR ESTABLISHING A LIEN ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE
AMOUNT OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES DUE
FROM THE PROPERTIES
-7-
F. APPROVAL OF THE FY 2023 -24 LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA
WILDLAND PROTECTION REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023 -36, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLE Y, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION FOR SERVICES FRO M
JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 FOR FIRE
PROTECTION SERVICES WITHIN THE LOCAL
RESPONSIBILITY AREAS WITHIN THE CITY
2. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Loca l Responsibility Area Wildland Protection Reimbursement Agreemen t with California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
G. AWARD OF PUBLIC SERVICE GRANT APPLICANTS WITH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Path of Life Ministries for Homelessness Services for an amount not to exceed $143,759 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement i n substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney; and Amy Sells, Principal Management Analyst reported that a minor change was made to the scope of services for the agreement with Path of Life Ministries to eliminate Item No. 9.
2. That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Family Service Association for the Senior Nutrition Program for an amount not to exceed $20,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
H. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND GRC ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT SERVICES
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and GRC Associates, Inc. for Community Development Block Grant Services and autho rize -8-
the City Manager to execute the First Amendment in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
I. AGREEMENT WITH GRC ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ANALYSIS OF
IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE STUDY
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement by and between the City of Jurupa Valley and GRC Associates, Inc. for the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Study and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially th e form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
J. AGREEMENT WITH FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, INC. FOR FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM SERVICES
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement by and between the City of Jurupa Valley and the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. for Fair Housing Program Services for an amount not to exceed $40,000 annually and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
K. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND GRC ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR
ADMINISTRATION OF THE AFFORDABLE HOMEOWNER
REHABILITATION GRANTS PROGRAM FOR THE 2023 -24 FISCAL
YEAR
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Amended and Restated Agreement for Consultant Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and GRC Associates, Inc. for Administration of the Affordable H omeowner Rehabilitation Grants Program and authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
L. SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK
DISTRICT TO OPERATE THE EDDIE DEE SMITH SENIOR CENTER
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Operation of the Eddie Dee Smith Senior Center between the City of Jurupa Valley and Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
-9-
M. AWARD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO VANCE CORPORATION
FOR VAN BUREN PHASE 3 FROM BELLEGRAVE TO ETIWANDA, CIP
#21111
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve and award a construction agreement to Vance Corporation in the amount of $2, 424,360.00 for the Van Buren Blvd Phase 3, CIP No. 21111, for the work included in its bid proposal and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the form attached to the staff report; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent r elated minor amendments to the Agreement with Vance Corporation, up to 10% as contingency to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions; and
3. Re-appropriate $580,796 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds from the City’s Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Phase 3 Project, Account No. 71393, to the Project account to fund total project costs; and
4. Appropriate $36,000 of grant funds from the FY 2022-23 CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement Grant Program.
N. AWARD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO V ANCE CORPORATION
FOR OLD MIRA LOMA PHASE 2, CIP #22103 – REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT CALENDAR FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve and award a construction agreement to Vance Corporation in the amount of $2,432,850.00 for the Old Mira Loma Phase 2, CIP No. 22103, for the work included in its bid proposal and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the form attached to the staff report; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related minor amendments to the Agreement with Vance Corporation, up to 10% as contingency to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions; and
3. Re-appropriate $339,750 of Measure ‘A’ funds and $819,204 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds from the City’s Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Phase 3 Project, Account No. 71393, to the Project account; and
4. Re-appropriate $677,181 of Measure ‘A’ funds from the City’s 2022-23 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Account No. 71411, to the Project Account.
-10-
O. RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE KK (BROWN
AVENUE TRAILER STORAGE PARK) TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTI NG MAINTENANCE DISTR ICT NO. 89 -1- CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&L MD 89 -1-C”),
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AGUA MANSA ROAD AND BROWN AVENUE
INTERSECTION
1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023 -37, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE KK AND THE
LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 -2025 PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-38, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REPORT OF
THE ENGINE ER REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION
OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-
CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE KK AND THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-
CONSOLIDATED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-39, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE KK AND TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024 -2025 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING PROTESTS
-11-
P. CONSIDERATION OF A P IPELINE CROSSING AGR EEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND UN ION PACIFIC
RAILROAD COMPANY FOR AN UNDERGROUND STOR M DRAIN
PIPELINE CROSSING
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Union Pacific Railroad Company for an underground storm drain pipeline crossing and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Items 1 3.D, 13.E, and 1 3.N, which w ere removed for further discussion.
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
13.D CONSIDERATION OF A R ESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE REPORT
OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE FEES AND INITI ATING THE
PROCEEDINGS TO MAKE DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE
COLLECTION SERVICES FEES A SPECIAL ASSES SMENT AND LIEN
AGAINST CERTAIN PARC ELS OF PROPERTY SITU ATED WITHIN
THE CITY AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 20, 2023 (BURRTEC SOLID WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.)
Council Member Brian Berkson asked that Item 13.D be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion to allow any resident affected by this item an opportunity to voice concern. Council Member Armando Carmona asked staff to provide information on the lien process.
Paul Toor, Director of Public Works provided addition al information and responded to Council’s questions.
Council Member Leslie Altamirano suggested to staff that information on utility resource assistance be forwarded to residents and that the notice be in both English and Spanish.
A motion was made by Council Member Brian Berkson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-34, entitled:
-12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECEIVING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT
ACCOUNTS FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES PRO VIDED BY BURRTEC
SOLID WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SETTING THE PUBLIC
HEARING FOR ESTABLISHING A LIEN ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN
THE AMOUNT OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES
DUE FROM THE PROPERTIES
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
13.E CONSIDERATION OF A R ESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE REPO RT
OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE FEES AND INITI ATING THE
PROCEEDINGS TO MAKE DELINQUENT SOLID WAS TE
COLLECTION SERVICES FEES A SPECIAL ASSES SMENT AND LIEN
AGAINST CERTAIN PARC ELS OF PROPERTY SITU ATED WITHIN
THE CITY AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 20, 2023 (USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.)
Council Member Brian Berkson asked that Item 13.E be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion to allow any resident affected by this item an opportunity to voice concern.
A motion was made by Council Member Brian Berkson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution No. 2023-35, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECEIVING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT
ACCOUNTS FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES PROVIDED BY USA
WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING
FOR ESTABLISHING A LIEN ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE
AMOUNT OF DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES DUE
FROM THE PROPERTIES
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
13.N AWARD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO V ANCE CORPORATION FOR OLD MIRA LOMA PHASE 2, CIP #22103
Council Member Armando Carmona asked that Item 13.N be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.
-13-
Paul Toor, Director of Public Works provided addition al information and responded to Council’s questions.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to 1) approve and award a construction agreement to Vance Corporation in the amount of $2,432,850.00 for the Old Mira Loma Phase 2, CIP No. 22103, for the work included in its bid proposal and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in the form attached to the staff report ; and 2) authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related minor am endments to the Agreement with Vance Corporation, up to 10% as contingency to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions; and 3) re-appropriate $339,750 of Measure ‘A’ funds and $819,204 of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds from the City’s Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Phase 3 Project, Account No. 71393, to the Project account; and 4) re-appropriate $677,181 of Measure ‘A’ funds from the City’s 2022-23 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Account No. 71411, to the Project Account.
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
15. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16. COUNCIL BUSINESS
17. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.
19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva congratulated his four children on their graduations. He spoke about his eldest daughter, who was born four months premature, noting that w hen she was born he and his wife were told to expect zero qualify of life. She is now thriving and was just promoted to the 9th grade.
Council Member Leslie Altamirano congratulated all the local graduates.
Mayor Chris Barajas encouraged residents to attend the Jurupa Valley Pro Rodeo as it should be a great community event.
-14-
20. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held June 15, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: J UNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.B
RESO
LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY
MANTAINED STREET SYSTEM FOR TRACT MAP 36391 RIVERBEND
LOCATED ON 68
TH STREET BETWEEN PATS RANCH ROAD AND
DANA AVENUE (LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.)
RECO
MMENDATION:
1. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-40, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM ( TRACT MAP 36391 RIVERBEND
LOCATED ON 68TH STREET BETWEEN PATS RANCH ROAD AND DANA
AVENUE) PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION
1806
2. Authorize the City Manager to record the Notice of Completion; and
3. D
irect the City Engineer to release the Labor and Materials and Performance Bonds for the street improvements and the Monument Bond.
BAC
KGROUND
Tr
act Map 36391, also known as Riverbend development, was approved by City Council April 7, 2016. The subdivision is a 464 lot single family residential development located on approximately 211 acres. The owner dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets designated as lettered lots on the map. Prior to recording the Final Map, Subdivision Agreements were executed and bonds were provided by the developer to secure required improvements.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
ANALYSIS
The developer, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., completed construction of the required improvements for Tract 36391. Staff inspected the improvements for compliance with the approved plans, adopted conditions of approval, the City’s Standard Plans and Specifications, and the Municipal Code. All improvements have been constructed and completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The streets now being accepted by this action are shown on the attached map. The developer provided street centerline ties and monument records. All monuments identified on the map are confirmed.
OTHER INFORMATION
Previous Actions:
• City Council meeting of April 7 , 2016: City Council approved Final Tract Map 36391, subdivision agreements, and accepted offers of dedication and improvements bonds.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Public Works Department will maintain the public improvements on the streets dedicated to the City and accepted on the map for Tract 36391. Maintenance of the public streets is primarily funded with Gas Tax (revenue from State gas tax). Maintenance of the water and sewer line facilities are the responsibility of Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) and the maintenance of the community trail is the responsibility of Jurupa Ar ea Recreation and Park District . Right-of-way landscaping maintenance along landscaped areas within the development are funded by an HOA and landscaping maintenance along 68 th Street, site lighting, operations, and the water quality basin maintenance will be funded by CFD 2015-001.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action.
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
-1-
RECORDING REQUESTED
BY AND WHEN RECORDED
MAIL TO:
City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183
______________________________________________________________________________________ EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEE PER GOVT. CODE § 6103
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY -
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (TRACT MAP 36391 RIVERBEND
LOCATED ON 68TH STREET BETWEEN PATS RANCH ROAD AND
DANA AV ENUE). PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
SECTION 1806
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that:
(a) Tract Map 36391 was recorded by the Riverside County Recorder on April 21, 2016 (“Tract Map”).
(b) Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66477.1 and 66477.2 and other applicable law, the Tract Map offer ed for dedication to the City certain land for streets, public utilities and associated drainage and public improvements as described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (“Streets”). (c) The City’s acceptance of the dedication of the Streets is conditioned on the completion of construction of the Streets and associated drainage and public improvem ents in accordance with City Standards and improvement plans approved by the City Engineer as provided in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the Streets entered into between the City and the owner of the tract.
(d) The City Engineer has inspected the Streets and has determined that the Streets and the public improvements related thereto have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans.
Section 2. The City Council hereby accepts the Streets and related drainage and public improvements as desc ribed and depicted on Exhibit A into the City -Maintained Street System pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 1806.
-2-
Section 3. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution and its exhibits to be recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of th e City of Jurupa Valley on this 1st day of June, 2023.
_____________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-3-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-40 was duly adopted and passed at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of June, 2023 by the following votes, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of June, 2023.
___________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1
EXHIBIT A
STREETS AND RELATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 36391
PATS RANCH CHRISTALES DRIVE
TIDE POOL DRIVE CHANDALAR CIRCLE
EBRO COURT ORINOCO DRIVE
RHONE COURT CHUTES COURT
BACKWATER WAY COVE WAY
BRAZOS COURT TRIBUTARY WAY
ELLICOTT COURT FORESHORE WAY
HOUSATONIC COURT JETTY COURT
LAGOON COURT LEVEE COURT
CONFLUENCE DRIVE MEANDER WAY
NARROW WAY OXBOW WAY
SANTIAM COURT RIPPLE COURT
SANDBAR COURT SHALLOWS DRIVE
SPRINGS WAY CACHE WAY
RANGELEY WAY BLANK SIDE DRIVE
NOTTOWAY COURT KEYWAY COURT
RIVANNA WAY WEIR WAY
WINNICUT COURT
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.C
ADO
PTION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE FISCAL YEAR
2023-24 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
RECO
MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-41, entitled:
A RESO
LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, ESTABLISHING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
BACKGROUND
The A
ppropriations Limit is a state-mandated calculation which is required to be approved each year by the City Council by July 1st for the new fiscal year. The Appropriations Limit sets the annual cap for spending tax proceeds. Based on the calculations attached to the Resolution (Exhibit A for 2023- 24), the City is under the cap for FY 2022- 23 by $2,607,499.
F
INANCIAL IMPACT
Thi
s resolution sets the FY 2023-24 Appropriations Limit at $51,335,642.
AL
TERNATIVES
1. N
one. The Appropriations Limit is required to be set by state law.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.D
Q
UARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2022 AND MARCH 31 , 2023 FOR FISCAL YEAR
2022/2023
RECO
MMENDATION
R
eceive and file the quarterly investment reports for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 quarter ending December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023.
BACKGROUND
A
quarterly investment report shall be received and filed with the City Council to provide a status of the current investments. City funds continue to be invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund, (LAIF). This Fiscal Year we began investments in US Treasuries through Wulff, Hansen and Company. T hese reports present the City’s investment portfolio for quarter ending December 31, 2022 and quarter ending March 31 , 2023.
Quarterly reports include the State of California Pooled Money Investment Account Market Valuation for December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023.
ANAL
YSIS
To pr
ovide an overview of quarterly investment report for investments held in L AIF with the California State Treasurer, and investments in US Treasuries for the quarters ending December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023.
S
taff will continue to provide City Council with quarterly investment reports.
F
INANCIAL IMPACT
Ther
e is no financial impact. This item is for informational purposes only.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOSE IBARRA, ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.E
F
IRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC, FOR ON -CALL
LEGAL SERVICES
RECO
MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Civica Law Group, APC (CIVICA) formerly known as Silver and Wright LLP for On-Call Legal Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.
BAC
KGROUND
Co
de Enforcement legal services are necessary to enforcing laws effectively, efficiently and fairly. RWG currently provides legal services for code enforcement related matters and has been successful at litigating cases and gaining compliance. While the Code Enforcement Division has been successful with RWG , the City still requires assistance from outs ide firms to manage unique situations and offer consulting services in specialized areas.
O
n February 12, 2021, RWG notified the City that it could not represent the City in a cross complaint case. This initiated the original agreement with CIVICA formerly known as Silver and Wright LLP to represent the City in the cross complaint and the code enforcement case. Staff selected CIVICA, since they are a qualified firm that specializes in code enforcement related matters with over 75 collective years of experience. The scope of work in the agreement was to represent the City in the cross complaint and represent the City in code enforcement cases. On March 10, 2021, the City Manager approved the agreement with CIVICA formerly known as Silver and Wright LLP to provide legal services. The cost of the agreement called for a not to exceed amount of $25,000 per fiscal year.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
ANALYSIS
CIVICA has largely been assisting City Code Enforcement staff with current on- going litigation on code enforcement cases. Due to the ongoing litigation and complexity of the code cases that CIVICA is working on, CIVICA has exhausted the original not to exceed amount of $25,000 per fiscal year.
Staff is proposing the First Amendment to the Agreement to extend the spending limit.
The proposed Amendment will increase CIVICA’s Agreement to $6 0,000 per fiscal year through the initial term of the Agreement. Funding for the Amendment is available in the current Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget. The majority of services are for ongoing litigation.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
If the First Amendment is approved, the not to exceed amount will be increased to $60,000.00 per fiscal year throughout the initial term of the Agreement. The majority of services provided will continue to be for ongoing litigation for cases that CIVICA is currently working on. The cost incurred during litigation will then go through a cost recovery process by CIVICA by placement of lien or payment of fees once the case is resolved.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the First Amendment between the City and CIVICA LAW GROUP APC
2. Do not approve the First Amendment between the City and CIVICA LAW GROUP APC. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CIVICA LAW GROUP, AI'C
AND TTIE CITY OF.IURUPA VALLEY
FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT LEGAL SERYICES
I. PARTItrS AND DATE.
This agreement ('oAgreement") is entered into and made effective on March 1,2023 by and between the CITY oF ruRUPA vALLEy ('city"), and cIVICA LAW GRoUp, Apc, a California Professional Corpolation engaged in the practice of law in the State of Califomi a (,,L,aw Firm'). Law Firm and the City are sometimes individually refemed to herein as "pa1ty;, and collectively as "Patties." In consideration of the rnutual promises set fbrth herein, the par.ties agree to the terms of this Agreement as set forth herein.
2, RECITALS.
2.1 The City wishes to engage the setvices of Law Firm to provide special counsel code enforcement legal services as described in this Agreernent. Law Firm wishes to pr:ovide all such seilices and has the necessary experlise and competency to provitle such services,
3. TERMS.
3'1 Scope of Services. Law Firm shall provicle legal advice, lepresentation a1d assistance to the City regarding code enfbrcement related matters as assignecl to Law Firm, including appeals and matters in detbnse of the City relating to cocle enforcernent matters. Law Firm shall repo( on a regular basis to the City regarding matters assigned to Law Firru, and shall landle matters subject to the input, oversight and direction of City staff and City Council or designee.
32 Responsibilities of Attorneys and Client. The City hereby requests and consents to the transfer of all files to Law Fir:n for matters refeired by City to Law Fir.m, Law Fir.m shall fully cooperate with the City and will keep the City and its staff informed of the status and progr."r, of all pending matters zurd all legal matters of importance with which Law Fir.rn is involved. Law Firm will manage and control the delivery of all legal services described hereunder in a professional, competent, and cost-effective mannel'. The City agrees to provide all information and documentation neoessary fot the attoureys at Law Firm to perform their obligations under this Agreement.
Partner Matthew Silver shall serve as the Law Finn contact ancl supervising counsel to the City. For the City, tlrc Code Enforcement Supervisor, unless otherwise ,otifi"d Uy ttre City, shau serve as primary contact.
3.3 Compensation. For all legal services provided in this Agreement, the City will compensate Law Firm at the blended rate of $238 per hour for attorney representation and $143per hour for paralegals and law clerks, which rates shall increase by 3% irounded to the near.est dollar on January I ofeach year to offset rising costs.
3.4 Cost Reimbursement. The City shall reimburse Law Ii'irm tbr all out-of-pocket 1 expenses incuned by Law }:irm in providing legal selvices under this Agreement, including charges forprinting and copying expenses at $.16 for black ancl white copies and $.60 for coloi. copies, postage, Lesearcfu litigation costs, courier and messengel serices anc{ automobile mileage at the cuffent IRS rate fol travel on behalf of the City. Costs shall be subject to a ten percent administrative fee to offset third party administration and costs. I{owever, no separate charge shall be made by Law Finn tbr secretarial or word processing selioes.
3.5 Staternents and Billine. Law Firm shall submit monthty invoices to the City indicating attomey 1'ees and costs incurred ibr the legat services provided under this Agreemeni.
The monthly invoice shall describe the nature of the wolk pertormed, the attorney perfoiming the wod< and the tirne spent for each task as well as the nature of any reimbursable expinses incuned.
Upon the request of and as clirected by the City, Law Firm shalt generate separate invoices pertaining to specific accounts, matters and/or departrnents. T'he City shall procesfancl cause sueh invoices to be paid promptly, typically withirr thirty (30) clays of receipt. If no attomeys' fees or costs ate incturedforaparticular month, or if they are minimal, the statement may be held ancl combined with that for the tbltowing month.
3.6 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the attorneys at Law Firm were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreernent, Therelbre, Law F'irm shall not contract with any other person or. entity to pertbtm, in whole or in part, the legal services required under this Agreement without the wtitten approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agleement, nor any interest herein, rnay be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, ol'encumberecl voluntarily, or by operation of iaw, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior wlitten approval of the City.
3.7 Conflicts of Ilrterest. Law Fiun shall comply with all applicable laws ancl professional rules and standards relating to any known corrflict of interest involvlng the City and mattel's upon which Law Firm is providing legal services under this Agreement. Law Finn shall not reveal confidential information of the City except with the consent of the Board of Supervisors or as otherwise tequired by law. Law Firm shall notify the City of any conflict of interest related to matters upon which it is providing legal services under this Agreement upon discovery of any such conflicts. In the event that such conflict is not ol cannot be waived or resolved City shail retain legal counsel and Law Firm shall assist and cooperate with legal counsel retainecl by the City on the matter for which the conflict ar.ose.
A- Law Firm represents that neither Law Firm for any of its attorneys or other petsons employed by Law Finn have any material financial interest, direct or indirect, in any contlact or decision made by or on behalf of City that may be affected by the services to bL provided to City pursuant to this Agrcernent, other than a financial interest that is sirnilar., in all material respects, to the interests of the general public.
B. If Law Finn or an attomey or other person employed by Law Firm acquires such an interest while this Agreement remains in effect, Law Firm will immediately disclose such interest to the City, and the interested individual shall not participate in or influence the performance of the services to be provided to the City pursuant to this Agreement.
C. In addition to the prescriptions regarding conflicts of interest imposed on attomeys by the California Business and Professions Cocle, and by Rule 3-310 of the C*ifomia Rules of Profcssional Concluct, I-aw Firm agl'ees tliat unlcss waivcd in wLiting by the City, neither Law Irirnt rlor any attot'ney employed lry Larv lfirrn shall replesent clients befbre any boarcl. cotnnlissiou, comtttittee ol clepat'tment of City or l'epresent a cliept advelse to City lbr a period of one (1) year f}orn the date o1'con4:letion o1'the services to bc ploviclecl to flity pursuant to this Agreement or the eat'ly terurination o1'the Aglccment ars provicled lbr in Section 3.10. 3-8 &e!uu !$rl9!. At the conclusion ol this Agleement, any or:iginal hles transmittecl to Law Firm by the City ibr the work lleribrmecl uncler this Agreenrent lbr the City shall be prade available to City. Law Fimr will be entitlecl to make copies o1'thc clielt files. At the co,clusion of this Agleement, (whether or not City takes possessiop of the clicnt files), Lar,v F'inn shall have no lirlther responsibility with regarcl to srrch clocuments. 3'9 Indepencleut Clontrtrctor. No cmploymcnt lelationship is createcl by this Agreemerrl.
Larv Film shall pcrfonl all legal services recluirecl uncier this Agreerneut as an inciepentle.t contractor of tlie City, exoept that at all tin-res provicling serrrices ulcler this Agreeprent, Law FiLrl,s employees ancl ageuts shall be acting as publio officials. Notwithstancling the foregoilg. lb1 purposes of any legal claims against l,aw liinn arising Ii'orn its provision of sen,ices to the City, Lalv Firtn shall be entitled to all defenses provicled by larv to City olficials, attorneys aucl prosecutol's, and to City's sttitutory cluties to the ol'lice o1'city prosecutor/attorney pur.suant to(loverrunent Clocle section 825 fbr providing a cleltnse, holcl harmless, and iirll incielnity to Laiv Fiiln lbr actions within the scope oI its engagement irereunrler and shail survive expiratior-r of this Agrcemetlt. 'I'his shall not in any way create a dfiy lot'the City for actions or.claims acljuclged to be due to [,aw Firm's gross negligence.
3'10 'l'ertnl 'l'enninatiotr o1'Agreeureut. 'l'he teun of tliis Agreement shall comrnence on the Irflective Date set lbrth in this Agreement ancl shall continue in full force ancl efl'ect rurtil te[ninated as provided hercin. City ol Law ]rin,r may terminate this Agreenrelt at any time, with or without catlse, on thirty (30) days' written notice to the oilrer party. In the evelt of such termination, Law Film shall comply with all provisions o1'tfte Rulesof Professional Coriduct lbr the terrnination of a client relationship anci ttie City shall pay Law F irnr pretbssional iees a1c1 costs, in accortlauce r,vith this Agreement. fbr all selvices proviclecl anr-l costi incurrecl throggh the clate o1'terntination o1'this Agt'eetuettt. The City agrees to execute, Llpoll reqgest, a stipulatiop iu suolr fbrm as b pennit Law Fit'nr to withdlaw as attorneys ol'recorcl iu any iegal actiorr then pending.
Law Finn shall cooperate to transition tepl'esertation to a ner,v attor.ney or tirm in a1 expeclient maluler and nialce available kt the City, ol to ccx.rnsel clesignatecl by the City, all doctunents ancl recot'ds of the legal services provided to thc City ancl shall assist to the lullest extent possibie i' the orderly transition of all pencling matlels to the City's new oounsel. I1'City cloes not take possession of the client files within sixty (60) days of termination of this Agrecrnent, City agrees that Law frinn may dispose of t]re client llles without lurther notioe.
3.11 Albitration. Intheevento{'anydisputetretweentheparties,suchclisputeshallbe submitted to binding at'bitration to the maxirnuru extent pcnnitted by law. Ip the eveiit the parties at'e rrnable to agree tlpotl an arbitratot', an arlritrator shall be seiectecl through the r.ules of the American Arbitration Associatiou. 'I'he albitratot' shall have the ar,rthority to set proceclures and discover in the arbitr:ation. Iu any suclr matter, the plevailing party shall be entitlecl to lecover its reasonable costs and attorney's lees. 'I'his section shall sLrrvive the expiratiol61'this Agreernent.
3.12 InsuranceCoverage,
J
A' Coverage Levels. Law Firm shall maintain at all tirnes cluring the term of this Agreement policies of insulance with at least the minimum coverage specified below:
l) General liability instuance with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000).
2) Workers'compensation coverage in compliance with California law. 3) Professional liability coverage with a minimum limit of liability of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) in the aggregate, providing covei.age for damages or losses suffered by City as a result of grossly negligent .rrois or orniisions by taw Firm that atises outof the professional services required by this Agreement, Such insurance may be subject to reasonable terms, limitations and conditions and a self-instued retention or deductible to be bgrne entirely by I.,aw Firrn which shall not exceed One I{unclrecl Thousancl Dollars ($1 00,000.00) per claim,
B. Prerequisites. The public liability poiicy of instuance specified above shall:
1) Name the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, its officers, agents and employees as additional insrueds.
2) Provide minimum thifty (30) days' notice of cancellation, said notice to be provided by insuret, except for non-payment of premium fol which teri (10) days' notice shall be ptovided by insur.er.
3) Be maintained in fult fbrce and effect tluoughout the term of thisAgreement.
Be placed with insurance carriers authorized to transact business in California with an A.M.
Best rating of no less than A-:vII or otherwise acceptable to city.
3.13 AmPndment: Modification. This agreement may be modified ttu.ough a wr.itteninstrument signed by both parties or by an oral agreement to theextent it is camied out.
3.I4 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, ancl supersedes all prior negotiations, rurderstandings, or agreements.
3.1s 'fi tion. The services of LawFinrl shall be perlbrmecl expeditioLrsly in light ol the purpor.r ort[i.t ag,".rnent. Law Fir.,r shall follow all ploceilues as establishecl by thc CiIOllow all plooedlues as establtshecl by tltc City consistcnt with its cluties. I-arv Firn shall rvork cooperatively with approprizrte City staff anci keep thenr intbrmecion all rnatters of irnnortance as they arise.
keep thenr iutbrmeci on all rnatters of irnportance as
3.16 Non-Discliminatio.l. In the perfbrmance of this Agreement, Law Firm sirzrll not discrirninate against any enrployee or applicant lrrr ernpJoymenl bccause o1'race, religious creecl, colol', sex, national origitt, ancestry, physical clisability, mental clisability, rnar.ital ,tot,,r, ug*, sexual orientation, or medical conclition.
3'17 Waiver. No delay or omission to exercise any right, power or remedy accruing to City under this Agreement shall irnpair any right, power or remedy ofbity, nor shall it be construed as a waiver of, or consent to, any breach or default, No waivei' of any breach, any failure of a condition, or any right or remedy under this Agreement: (l) shall be deemecl effective unless it is in writing and signed by City; (2) shall be deemed to be'a waiver. of, or consent to, a'y other breach, failure of a condition, or right or remedy; or (3) shall be deemed to constitute a cortinuing waiver unless the writing expressly so states.
3.18 Governins Law and Intelpretation. This Agreement shall be construed and enfotced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to contlict of lawprinciples. lhe section captions and headings in this Agrcernent have been inserted for convenience only, and shall not be considered or refened to in resolving questions of interpretation or construction.
3.19 Severabilitv. If any portion or all of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable for any teason, the remainder of that provision and the remainder of the Agreement shall remain infull force and effect.
3.20 Notices. All notices permiffed or requited under this Agreement shall be given to the respective pafiies at the following address, or at such other addreJs as the respectivJparties may provide in writing for this puryose:
'l'o Lar,r, Firrn; Civica Law Group, APC
4000 Bau'anca Parkway
suite 250, PMB #792
Irvine, CA92604
(949) s92-016s
Attn: Chief Operating Officer
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
(gsr) 332-6464
Attn: City Manager
'l'o City:
Such notice shall be deerned made when personally clelivered or when mailed, fbrty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class po.tr[* prepaid ancl addressed to the iurty utits applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemecl adequate notice on the date actual notice occumed, r'egatdless of the method of service.
ISIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
3.21 Counterparts. This Agreement nay be signed in counterparts, each of which shallconstitute an original.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLBY
Rod Butler'
City Manager
CIVTCA LAW GROUP, APC
By: t€r4€, Dated: February &, ZOI
Dated: Febrr.rary Ll-,rOT
6 1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC
AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT LEGAL SERVICES
1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This First Amendment to the agreement for services (“Amendment”) by and between the CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY (“City”), and CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC, a California Professional Corporation engaged in the practice of law in the State of California (“Law Firm”) is effective as of June 15, 2023. Law Firm and the City are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree to the terms of this Agreement as set forth herein.
2. RECITALS.
2.1 The City and Law Firm entered into an Agreement on March 1, 20 23, whereby, Law Firm agreed to provide legal services to the City.
2.2 The City and Law Firm now desire to amend the Agreement.
3. TERMS.
3.1 Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein. a. Section 3.3 is here by amended in its entirety to read as follows: For all legal services provided in this Agreement, the City will compensate Law Firm at the blended rate of $238 per hour for attorney representation and $143 per hour for paralegals and law clerks, which rates shall increase by 3% rounded to the nearest dollar on July 1 of each year to offset rising costs.
The attorney’s fees to Law Firm under this Agreement shall not exceed $60,000 per fiscal year on a net basis without approval of the City.
3.2 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement on March 1, 2023 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
From and after the date of this Amendment, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment to the Agreement. Said Agreement is and remains an effective, valid and binding obligation.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
By: ____________________________ Dated: June _____, 2023 Rod Butler
City Manager
[Signatures continue on following page]
Approved as to form:
By: ____________________________
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTESTED BY:
By: ____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC
By: ___________________________ Dated: June ____, 2023 Matthew Silver
Managing Partner
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
STAFF REPORT
DAT
E: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.F
AG
REEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES WITH THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
RECO
MMENDATION
1. That
the City Council approve the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services with the County of Riverside through the Sheriff’s Department for a term of five (5) years, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND
Upon incorporation of the City in July of 2011, the City of Jurupa Valley entered into an agreement with the County of Riverside Sheriff’s Department (Sheriff) to provide law enforcement services. Since incorporation, the City has maintained this agreement for contract law enforcement services and the current Agreement is set to expire on June 30, 2023.
ANAL
YSIS
Thr
ough this new Agreement the County agrees, through the Sheriff to provide municipal police protection within the corporate limits of the City of Jurupa Valley. It is understood that the Sheriff’s Department will be the sole provider of general and speci alized law enforcement services within the corporate limits of the City. The Sheriff’s services will encompass duties and functions of the type falling under the jurisdiction of and customarily rendered by a police department of the City under state statutes. Such services will include the enforcement of State Criminal Codes and all pertinent City criminal codes and ordinances. Services will also include traffic enforcement and related services to the extent possible given the size of the force provided for in the Agreement.
The County agrees to provide all investigative support necessary to complete criminal investigations.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Original 1 of 3
AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
THIS AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF JURUPA, a California General Law City, hereinafter “City,” and the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California , on behalf of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, hereinafter “County”, sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “parties” and individually as a “party”.
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. TERM
1.1 Effective Dates. Thi
s Agreement shall be effective from July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2028.
1.2 Renewal. In t
he event City desires to terminate this Agreement at the end of any current five (5) year period, the City Council, not later than twelve (12) months preceding the expiration date of the current term of this Agreement, shall notify the Sheriff and the Board of Supervisors that it wishes to terminate the same.
1.3 Termination. Not
withstanding the provisions of Paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 herein, either party may terminate this Agreement upon notice in writing to the other party of not less than twelve (12) months prior to the effective termination date.
2. SCO
PE OF SERVICE
2.1 Services. Th e County agrees, through Sheriff thereof, to provide municipal police protection within the corporate limits of City to the extent and in the manne r hereinafter set forth. It is understood that the Sheriff’s Department shall be the sole provider of general and specialized law enforcement services within the corporate limits of City. City shall not hire any other persons or company to provide general and specialized law enforcement services within the corporate limits of City. However, City is not precluded by any language in this section from hiring an unarmed code enforcement unit. The Sheriff’s services shall encompass duties and functions of the type falling under the jurisdiction of and customarily rendered by a police department of the City under State statutes.
Such services shall include the enforcement of State Criminal Codes and all pertinent City criminal codes and ordinances. Services shall also include traffic enforcement and related services to the extent possible given the size of the force provided for in this Agreement. County agrees to provide all investigative support necessary to complete criminal investigations conducted hereunder. However, all investigator overtime will be charged to City at the Board of Supervisors approved hourly overtime rate.
2.2 California Identification System (CAL-ID) and Records Management System. (RMS) City agrees as a condit ion of receiving services hereunder to participate in CAL -ID and RMS under the terms and conditions set forth in this Section and to pay for these services under separate billings.
2.2A Definitions. For pu rposes of this Agreement the following are some of the more common definitions which shall apply, but shall not be limited by this reference:
a) Reco
rds Management System (RMS) Functions shall mean the software functions provided to City by County, which are supplied by the RMS. These functions shall include inquiry and case entry into the RMS, access to the Master Name Index, Warrant and Master Location Index and Jail Locator databases.
b) The California Law Enforc ement Telecommunications System Access (CLETS) shall mean that access to the Department of Justice computers provided by County to City.
c) Work Station shall mean those County devices and software, which are used by City to access RMS functions and the CLETS.
d) LAWNET shall mean the County’s law enforcement telecommunications network consisting of County provided data circuits, digital service units, routers, hubs and other County provided hardware and software that is used by City to connect work stations to RMS services as defined below.
e) County Services shall mean the collective hardware and software, work LAWNET, stations, RMS functions and CLETS.
2.2B Scope of RMS Services. Count
y agrees to provide to City full access to the RMS and
CLETS systems. CLETS access will be provided within the scope of CLETS access rules and regulations as established by the California State Department of Justice.
2.2C Provision of RMS Supervision, Labor and Equipment. Supervision over the provi sion
of County Services, the standards of performance and other matters incident to the performance of such services, shall remain with County. Security of the host system and control of LAWNET shall remain with County. The County shall furnish all labor and equipment for the host system necessary to maintain the level of service rendered hereunder. In the event City chooses to provide PC-based equipment for services defined herein, the equipment must be configured in accordance with County specifications. Further, City shall not alter the configuration of any PC- based equipment used to provide services herein without the permission of Sheriff's Information Technology Officer.
2.2D Establishme nt of
RMS Rates and Payment of Costs. Establishment of RMS rates and payments for provided services shall be as specified in Sections 7.2 and 7.4 of this Agreement.
3. LEVEL O
F SERVICE
3.1 Level of Service Specified. County shall provide all enforcement services at the level specified in Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3.2 Variation in Level of Service. Va riations in the level of service shall be made by amendment, as provided for in Section 11 of this Agreement, and under the following terms:
If C
ity requests an increase in the level of service to be provided under this Agreement, County agrees to provide such increased level of service as soon as is practicable, consistent with the ability of the Sheriff to hire and train recruits.
If City elects to reduce the level of service provided herein by ten percent (10%) or greater, City must give notice in writing to County not less than twelve (12) calendar months prior to the effective date of such reduction. If City elects to reduce the level of service provided herein by less than ten percent (10%), County agrees to reduce the level of service accordingly as soon as it is practicable. The level of service, however, may not be reduced to below the minimum level, as determined by County, required to ensure public and officer safety.
4. CHIEF OF POLICE
The Sheriff will, to the extent practical, coordinate appointment of a Police Chief with City and consult with City on final selection for the position.
5. PROVISION OF SUPERVISION, LABOR, AND EQUIPMENT
5.1 Supervision. Supervision over the rendition of law enforcement services, the standards of performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed, shall remain with County. The S heriff or a designated representative will meet and confer with the City Manager or a designated representative on questions related to the provision of services.
5.2 Labor and Equipment. For the purpose of performing said services, County shall furni sh and supply all labor, supervision, equipment, communication services, and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder. Location of the above will not necessarily be within City limits. Notwithstanding anything herein c ontained, it is agreed that in all instances where specific equipment used solely to support specialized enforcement activities within the City not normally provided by the Sheriff is to be used, or where special supplies, stationery, notices, forms, and the like related to law enforcement are to be issued in the name of City, such equipment and materials shall be supplied by City at its own cost and expense. Any such special equipment or materials so purchased by City shall meet with the Sheriff's specifi cations shall remain within the City limits, and ownership title thereto shall remain with City.
Howe
ver, under no circumstances shall City purchase or otherwise provide general patrol vehicles for services provided pursuant to this A greement without permission of Sheriff. The County shall provide all marked general Patrol vehicles to City and shall charge City for their use on a per mile basis.
5.3 City-Owned Motorcycles and Specialized Support Vehicles. I n the event City chooses to
provide motorcycles or specialized support vehicles for use in providing services hereunder, the
motorcycles or specialized support vehicles shall meet minimum specifications furnished by County, shall be adequately equipped and ready for use, and shall be registered in the name of City. It is further understood that City is providing motorcycles or specialized support vehicles to Sheriff expressly for law enforcement services and shall only be operated by Sheriff’s personnel, or persons authorized by the Sheriff.
City shall bear the cost of maintenance, fuel, licensing, and any and all expenses associated with use of the motorcycles and specialized support vehicles for the provision of services hereunder, which is inclusive of responsibility for any and all cost for physical damage to the City-owned motorcycles or specialized support vehicles. However, County shall be responsible for the cost of all third party liability caused by the operation of the City- owned motorcycles or specialized support vehicles, including the property damage caused by the negligence or wrongful acts of County officers and employees while operating City-owned motorcycles and specialized support vehicles. Motorcycles and specialized support vehicles shall be used only for city-approved functions.
5.4 V ehicle Insurance. Ci
ty shall maintain insurance for any physical damage to the City- owned vehicles in an amount equal to the replacement value of all vehicles provided to the County under this Agreement. Policy shall, by endorsement, name the County of Riverside, its Departments, Districts, Agencies and Special Districts, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents, or representatives as Additional Insureds. Such insurance may be provided through a program of self-insurance.
Gene
ral Insurance Provisions - All lines:
a. Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shall be admitted to the State of California and have an A.M. BEST rating of not less than an A: VIII (A: 8) unless such requirements are waived, in writing, by the County Risk Manager. If the County's Risk Manager waives a requirement for a particular insurer such waiver is only valid for that specific insurer and only for one policy term.
b. The City shall cause their insurance carrier(s) to furnish the County of Riverside with 1) a properly executed original Certificate(s) of Insurance and certified original copies of Endorsements effecting coverage as required herein; or, 2) if requested to do so orally or in writing by the County Risk Manager, provide original certified copies of policies including all Endorsements and all attachments thereto, showing such insurance is in full force and effect. Further, said Certificate(s) and policies of insurance shall contain the covenant of the insurance carrier(s) that shall provide no less than thirty (30) days written notice be given to the County of Riverside prior to any material modification or cancellation of such insurance. In the event of a material modification or cancellation o f coverage, this Agreement shall terminate forthwith, unless the County of Riverside receives, prior to such effective date, another properly executed original Certificate of Insurance and original copies of endorsements or certified original policies, including all endorsements and attachments thereto evidencing coverages and the insurance required herein are in full force and effect. Individual(s) authorized by the insurance carrier to do so on its behalf shall sign the original endorsements for each policy and the Certificate of Insurance. If County is utilizing City-owned vehicles, operations shall not commence until the County of Riverside has been furnished original Certificate (s) of Insurance and certified original copies of endorsements or policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all other attachments as required in this Section.
c. It is understood and agreed by the p arties hereto and the City 's insurance company(s), that the Certificate(s) of Insurance and policies shall so covenant and shall be construed as primary insurance, and the County's insurance and/or deductibles and/or self -insured retentions or self-insured programs shall not be construed as contributory.
6. EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF PERSONNEL
6.1 Employment Status. Any pe
rsons employed by County for the performance of services and functions pursuant to this Agreement shall remain employees of County on special assignment to City for the purposes of this Agreement, and shall not be considered employees of City. No such County employee shall have any entitlement to compensation, workers’ compensation coverage, pension, or civil service benefits from City.
6.2 Labor Shortage. In the event of a work slow-down,
strike, or any other form of job action
by those individuals assigned to City, County agrees to provide only that level of service which may be available through mutual aid, pursuant to Government Code Section 8615, et seq. City shall be billed only for the actual hours of service received.
7. CO
MPENSATION
7.1 Payment Basis. Cit y shall reimburse County the cost of rendering services hereunder at rates established by the County Board of Supervisors, which rates shall include all items of cost and expense to the Sheriff for providing the services hereunder. Such cost of services shall be established by the County Board of Supervisors in the form of hourly rates for Sheriff’s Department personnel, vehicle mileage rates, facility use rates, RMS transaction fees and CAL-ID fees. "Cost" as used herein shall not include items of expense attributable to services normally provided or available to all territory within the County as part of County's obligation to enforce State law. In addition to any other fees or costs set forth herein, County may impose on City, and City shall pay upon receipt of an invoice from County, a criminal justice administrative fee consistent with Government Code Section 29550 with respect to arrests made by County employees pursuant to this Agreement just as if such arrests had been made by City employees. Pursuant to Government Code Section 51350, County shall not charge City for services it would provide to any city in the County free of charge. These services, which are provided at the discretion of County, could typically include the services of the Sheriff's Special Investigations Bureau, Emergency Services Team and Aviation Unit.
7.2 Establishment of Costs. The
rates to be charged City shall be adjusted periodically, but not more than once each fiscal year, to reflect any changes in the cost to County for providing services hereunder. City shall be notified of any change in the rates to be charged City prior to submittal of the proposed change to the County Board of Supervisors for adoption, and City shall be given the opportunity to review the proposed change with County personnel. City shall, thereafter, be notified of adoption by County of the rates to be charged City, and said new rates shall take effect on the same date as County incurs the associated costs. Should City, subsequent to a rate adjustment, choose not to appropriate or expend any additional monies needed to support the level of service theretofore supplied, County reserves the right to reduce the level of service in accordance with the amount City is willing to expend.
7.3 Facility Rate Charges. City shall reimburse County for the costs incurred by the Sheriff’s Department at County-owned or leased facilities. Costs are prorated according to the facility’s square footage occupied by a Sheriff’s Department Bureau or Unit.
7.3A Calculation of Facility Rates . T he total of the facility’s cost components is divided by the appropriate variable number of positions (number of station funded, sworn department funded or total Department funded employees depending on the facility in question and the Department population served). This cost per funded position is then applied to the number of positions chargeable to the contract city to arrive at each contract city’s share of the facility cost.
The C
ounty agrees that Facility Rate Station charges to City will not be increased due to the Sheriff’s decision to move Contract or unincorporated County Patrol positions from the Station.
7.4 Payment of Costs. County, through the Sheriff’s Department, shall provide to City within 30 days of the conclusion of each billing period, an itemized statement of the costs for services being charged for said billing period. Billing statements for RMS services will be provided quarterly for services being charged for said quarter. City shall remit payment to the invoicing department within 30 days after receipt of such statements. If such payment is not received by the County within thirty (30) days after presentation of billing, County may satisfy such indebtedness from any funds of the City on deposit with County as provided by law pursuant to Government Code Section 907.
7.5 Field Training Costs. Should C
ity elect to add additional Deputy Sheriff positions to the level of service described herein, there will be an associated field training cost for each additional position. City will be billed, on a separate invoice, up to a maximum of sixteen (16) weeks of training on a one-time basis for each additional Deputy position. Said cost will be charged at the Unsupported Deputy hourly rate as approved by the County Board of Supervisors. Billing will be provided for field training costs in conjunction wi th the rate adjustment billing . Field training costs will not apply to supervisory or classified positions added to the level of service.
7.6 Mi
scellaneous Costs. There are a number of other service costs that City shall be responsible for paying as they are incurred. These costs are not included as the support or service and materials cost components in the fully supported Deputy hourly rate, nor any other such rates established by the County Board of Supervisors. These service costs may include, but are not limited to , charges from vendors for: crime scene clean -up, blood draws, rape exams, polygraph exams, specialized printing jobs exclusive to City and training for personnel requested by City for specialized law enforcement.
8. I
NDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
8.1 Indemnification by City. City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives from any liability, claim, damage or action whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of City, its officers, employees, contractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death. City shall defend, at its sole cost and expense, including but not limited to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards, the County, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives in any such action or claim. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by
City, City shall, at its sole cost, have the right to use counsel of its own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of County; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes City's indemnification of County. City's obligations hereunder shall be satisfied when City has provided to County the appropriate form of dismissal (or similar document) relieving the County from any liability for the action or claim involved. Any insurance coverage shall in no way limit or circumscribe City's obligations to indemnify and hold harmless the County.
8.2 Indemnification by County. County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives from any liability, claim, damage or action whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of County, its officers, employees, contractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death. County shall defend, at its sole cost and expense, including but not limited to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards, the City, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officer s, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives in any such action or claim. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by County, County shall, at its sole cost, have the right to use counsel of its own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of City; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes County's ind emnification of City. County's obligations hereunder shall be satisfied when County has provided to City the appropriate form of dismissal (or similar document) relieving the City from any liability for the action or claim involved. Any insurance coverage shall in no way limit or circumscribe County's obligations to indemnify and hold harmless the City.
9. ADM
INISTRATION
The City Manager of City shall administer this Agreement on behalf of City, and the Sheriff shall administer this Agreement on behalf of County.
10. RECORDS
County shall maintain adequate records to discharge its responsibilities under this Agreement, and shall permit inspection of County’s appropriate records that relate to City services under this Agreement, as allowed by law. County shall provide City access to appropriate records pertaining to City services for approval, funding or auditing services, upon reasonable notice. County shall maintain such records for periods of time as provided by law or records retention schedules duly adopted by the appropriate legislative body. Covenants under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
11. ALTERATION OF TERMS
No addition to, or alteration of, the terms of this Agreement, whether by writt en or verbal understanding of the parties, their officers, agents, or employees, shall be valid unless made in the form of a written amendment to this Agreement which is formally approved and executed by both parties.
No waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall be a continuing waiver thereof.
12. NOTICES
Any notices required or desired to be served by either party upon the other shall be addressed to the respective parties as set forth below:
County City
Chad Bianco, Sheriff City of Jurupa Valley
Riverside County Sheriff’s Department 8930 Limonite Avenue Post Office Box 512 Jurupa Valley , California 92509 Riverside, California 92502 Attn: City Manager
or to such other addresses as from time to time may be designated by the respective parties. An information copy of any notice to County shall also be sent to:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street, 1
st Floor
Riverside, California 92501
Notice shall be deemed given when in writing and delivered personally or mailed with confirming delivery receipt addressed as set out above.
13. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
14. STANDARD OF CARE
In performing the police services required by this Agreement, County agrees to use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by law enforcement officers in performance of the duties required by this Agreement. All Sheriff’s personnel who provide general and specialized law enforcement services to City pursuant to this Agreement shall have m et the minimum qualifications designated for their specific classification, including a background investigation.
15. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of California. In the event any action or proceeding is filed to interpret, enforce, challenge, or invalidate any term of this Agreement, venue shall lie only in the state or federal courts in or nearest to Riverside County.
16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions
thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith.
17. ELECTRONIC/DIGITAL SIGNATURES
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument. Each party of this Agreement agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ((“CUETA”) Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this Agreement. The Parties furth er agree that the electronic signatures of the Parties included in this Agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to the CUETA as amended from time to time. The CUETA authorizes use of an electronic signature for transact ions and contracts among parties in California, including a government agency. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and sha ll be reasonably relied upon by the parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code.
[Signatures on Following Page]
10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Jurupa by minute order or resolution duly adopted by its City Council, has caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested and sealed by its Clerk, and the County of Riverside, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this Agreement to be subscribed by the Chair of said Board and sealed and attested by the Clerk of said Board, all on the dates indicated below.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
Dated:_________________ By:________________________ Chris Barajas, Mayor
ATTEST:
Name:
Title:
By:___________________
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Dated:_________________ By:_________________________ Kevin Jefferies
Chair of the Board of Supervisors
Riverside County Board of Supervisors
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kimberly A. Rector Minh C. Tran
Clerk of the Board County Counsel
By:____________________ By:_________________
Deputy Kristine Bell- Valdez
Deputy County Counsel
11 ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Average Patrol Services
180 fully supported hours per day (Approximate equivalent of 35 Deputy Sheriff positions @ 1,884 annual productive hours per position).
Dedicated Positions
Six (6) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Zone Policing Officers
Three (3) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Traffic Enforcement Officers
Five (5) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Motorcycle Enforcement Officers
Two (2) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Community Oriented Policing
Two (2) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions – Commerical Enforcement Officers
Seven (7) Community Service Officer positions – Traffic Enforcement/Patrol
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.G
CO
NSIDERATION OF ANIMAL FIELD AND SHELTER SERVICES
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve the Agreement for Animal Field and Shelter Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and the County of Riverside; and 2)
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form submitted to the City Council.
BAC
KGROUND
Since June 20, 2017, the County of Riverside (“County”) has provided Animal Field and Shelter Services and an integrated canine licensing program. The City has maintained this agreement for animal control services and the current Agreement is set to expire June 30, 2023.
ANALYSIS
The proposed Agreement for Animal Field and Shelter Services continues to provide for similar animal field and shelter services. The animal field services are detailed in Exhibit A to the proposed Agreement, and the animal shelter services are detailed in Exhibit B to the proposed Agreement. This agreement has no changes from the previous 2020 agreement and is effective from July 1, 2023 and terminates on June 30, 2026, unless terminated earlier as stated in Section VI in the Agreement.
Animal field and Sheltering Services Rates in the 2023 Agreement include:
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
A. Animal Field and Sheltering Services Rates*
Service Impounds Amount Total Yearly Monthly
Installments
Animal Control Officer (two full-
time) - $172,640 $345,280 $28,773
Animal Sheltering* 3,221 $20 per day $644,200 $53,683
Wildlife Impounds 147 $138 each $20,286 $1,691
Deceased Animal Pick-Up and
Disposal 745 $70 each $52,150 $4,346
Operation & Maintenance* 3,221 $12.53 each $40,359 $3,363 Total Sheltering Cost $1,102,275 $91,856
* Yearly cost estimate based on approximate impound rate of 3,221 stray dogs and cats per year, based on an average of ten (10) kenneling days. Rates are established by the Board of Supervisors and are subject to change as amended by County from time to time.
The City will be provided with actual impound statistics each month that detail the number of animals impounded and the number of kenneling days.
Large Animal Sheltering: $20/animal (horses, ponies, cattle) per day of sheltering.
Large Animal Sheltering: $12/animal (swine, goats, sheep) per day of sheltering.
B. Collection of License Fees
The City authorizes County to issue and collect the fees for canine licenses and retain ten dollars ($10) per license on any and all canine license revenue generated by CITY residents during the term of the Agreement. All fees collected for canine licenses shall be accounted for by the County on a monthly basis and the County will credit to City the net amount of license fees collected for each month. The net amount of license fees will mean the total amount of license fees collected in a month less the sum total of $10 per each canine license issued and shall be separate and apart from the monthly compensation rate due and payable by the City as set forth above in Section A.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The contract cost for animal control services for FY 2023-24 is approximately $1,102,275 and is included in the proposed 2023-24 Budget.
Page | 3
ALTERNATIVES
1. Elect not to approve the proposed Agreement for Animal Field and Shelter Services and provide staff with input regarding appropriate revisions to be incorporated into the proposed Agreement for the County’s and the Council’s consideration.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
1 AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL FIELD AND SHELTER SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
THIS AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL FIELD AND SHELTER SERVICES (“Agreement”), is made and entered into as of July 1, 2023 (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a general law city, (“CITY”), and the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, on behalf of its Department of Animal Services (“COUNTY”), collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY desires to contract with COUNTY to provide animal field and shelter services for the purpose of safeguarding the health and safety of CITY’s population and the health and safety of its domestic animals;
WHEREAS, CITY desires to promote the humane treatment of animals; WHEREAS, COUNTY has the personnel and experience to provide such services and is willing to enter into a contract with CITY for the provision of such services subject to the terms and conditions for compensation as hereinafter set forth; and NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and advantages herein stated, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION I. OBLIGATIONS OF PARTIES
A. Recitals:
1. The aforementioned Recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.
B. County Obligations:
1. COUNTY shall provide the field and shelter services within the corporate jurisdictional limits of CITY as outlined and specified in Exhibit A, Scope of Animal Field Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference , and; Exhibit B, Scope of Animal Shelter Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
C. City Obligations:
1. CITY shall reimburse COUNTY for the services performed and the expenses incurred as set forth in Section III. , Compensation, and Exhibit C, Payment Provisions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. CITY shall be responsible for handli ng, whether directly or by its own legal counsel, administrative or criminal proceedings, including and without limitation, appeals and enforcement actions, arising under the services provided in this Agreement. COUNTY shall cooperate with CITY in making available such COUNTY animal control service employees for such proceedings if necessary, for providing testimony or information.
2 3. In order for COUNTY to provide the full scope of services to CITY under this Agreement, within six months following the Effective Date of this Agreement, CITY shall adopt the current verbatim language of the regulations, provisions, and rates found in Riverside County Ordinance Nos. 534, 560, 630, 716, 771, and 878 (“Animal Control Ordinances”), and shall amend its CITY m unicipal code when COUNTY amends its Animal Control Ordinances, from time to time.
COUNTY shall provide the verbatim language to the CITY that shall be adopted into CITY’s municipal codes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY retains all legislative authority pertaining to the regulation of animals within its jurisdiction.
The County regulates the issuance of dog licenses in one, two or three year increments as provided in Section 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 630. The CITY adopted Section 10.08.020 .I of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code that would permit issuing a dog license for a period of less than a year due to backdating the license issuance date to align the expiration date of the dog license with the expiration of the vaccination and to provi de for a pro-rata reduction or discount of the license fee as a result of the backdating. The Parties will work cooperatively to develop a schedule of pro-rated fees for use by the COUNTY when in issuing any licenses where such backdating was performed pu rsuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 10.08.020.I. The schedule of pro-rated fees will be prepared using the following formula: The discounted fee would be calculated by dividing the total dog licensing fee by the number of months within the lic ense period and then subtracting from that the licensing fee the per month license fee cost per the number of months backdated. For illustrative purposes only, the following examples demonstrate how the fees would be pro -rated: JVMC Section 10.08.020.F.(1) provides that the fee for a 1-year dog license for a sterile dog is $16. If COUNTY issues a 1 -year license for the time period of January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, but the date of expiration of the subject dog’s vaccination immunity is October 31, 2021, and the dog license is backdated to that October date, then the prorated dog license fee would be calculated as follows: $16 - [($16/12 months) x 2 backdated months] = $13.34. Similarly, a 3 -year licensed issued for $35 under JVMC Section
10.08.020.F.(5) that is backdated by four months upon the dog owner’s request would be prorated as follows: $35 - [$35/36 months x 4 backdated months] = $31.11.
SECTION II. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
The Effective Date of this Agre ement shall be from July 1, 2023 and shall terminate on June 30, 2026, unless terminated earlier as provided herein under Section VI, Termination.
SECTION III. COMPENSATION
CITY shall pay actual costs and reimburse COUNTY for the services performed and the expenses incurred in accordance with the terms of Exhibit C, subject to any applicable changes in the rates and fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors of COUNTY. 3 SECTION IV. HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION
A. CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives from any liability, claim, damage or action whatsoever, based or asserted upon any actions of CITY, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death or any other element of any kin d or nature whatsoever and resulting from any reason whatsoever arising from the negligent or willful actions by CITY, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives of this Agreement. CITY shall defend, at its sole expense, all costs and fees including but not limited to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards of all Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments of the County of Riverside, their respective directors, officers, Board of S upervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives in any such action or claim or action based upon such alleged acts or omissions.
B. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by CITY, CITY shall, at its sole cost, have the right to use counsel of its own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of COUNTY; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes CITY’s indemnification to COUNTY as set forth herein.
CITY’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY shall be subject to COUNTY having given CITY written notice within a reasonable period o f time of the claim or of the commencement of the related action, as the case may be, and information and reasonable assistance, at CITY’s expense, for the defense or settlement thereof. CITY’s obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when CITY has provided to COUNTY the appropriate form of dismissal relieving COUNTY from any liability for the action or claim involved.
C. The specified insurance limits required in this Agreement shall in no way limit the CITY’s obligations to indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY herein from third party claims.
D. COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, City Council, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and repr esentatives from any liability, claim, damage or action whatsoever, based or asserted upon any actions of COUNTY, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death or any other element of any kind or nature whatsoever and resulting from any reason whatsoever arising from the negligent or willful actions by COUNTY, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives of this Agreement. COUNTY shall defend, at its sole expense, all costs and fees including but not limited to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards of all Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments of the CITY, their respective directors, officers, City Council, elected and appointed officials, 4 employees, agents and representatives in any such action or claim or action based upon such alleged acts or omissions.
E. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by COUNTY, COUNTY shall, at its sole cost, have the right to use counsel of its own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of CITY; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes COUNTY’s indemnification to CITY as set forth herein.
COUNTY’S obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY shall be subject to CITY having given COUNTY written notice within a reasonable period of time of the claim or of the commencement of the related action, as the case may be, and information and reasonable assistance, at COUNTY’s expense, for the defense or settlement thereof. C OUNTY’s obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when COUNTY has provided to CITY the appropriate form of dismissal relieving CITY from any liability for the action or claim involved.
F. The specified insurance limits required in this Agreement shall in no way limit the COUNTY’s obligations to indemnify and hold harmless CITY herein from third party claims.
G. Solely for the purpose of applying the indemnity and hold harmless obligations of the PARTIES pursuant to paragraphs A, B, C and D of this Section IV, COUNTY animal Control service employees shall not be deemed to be officials, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives of the City, but shall be employees of the COUNTY.
SECTION V. INSURANCE
COUNTY agrees to maintain the following insurance coverage during the term of this Agreement:
A. Workers’ Compensation:
COUNTY shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Coverage A) as prescribed by the laws of the State of California. The policy shall include Employers’ Liability (Coverage B) including Occupational Disease with limits not less than $1,000,000 per person per accident.
B. Commercial General Liability:
COUNTY shall maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance coverage for claims, which may arise from or out of COUNTY’s performance of it s obligations hereunder. This coverage shall have a limit of liability not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit.
C. Vehicle Liability:
If vehicles or mobile equipment is used in the performance of the obligations under this Agreement, then COUNTY agrees to maintain automobile liability insurance for vehicles provided by the COUNTY for use under this Agreement. This coverage shall have a limit of liability of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit.
5 D. General Insurance Provisions – All Lines:
1. Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shall be admitted to the State of California and have an A M BEST rating of not less than A: VIII (A:8).
2. The insurance requirements contained in this Agreement may be met with a program(s) of self-insurance.
SECTION VI. TERMINATION
A. Either Party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon no earlier than six (6) months advance written notice served on the other Part y stating the extent and effective date of termination.
B. If a six (6) month notice of termination is served on the other Party, after receiving said notice of termination, COUNTY shall stop work under this Agreement on the termination date specified in th e notice of termination; and after termination, CITY shall make payment to COUNTY for performance up to the date of termination in accordance with this Agreement.
C. If the COUNTY materially defaults under this Agreement, the CITY may terminate this Agreement for cause. CITY shall make payment to COUNTY for performance up to the date of termination in accordance with this Agreement.
SECTION VII. FORCE MAJEURE
If either Party is unable to comply with any provision of this Agreement due to causes beyond its reasonable control, and which could not have been reasonably anticipated, such as acts of God, acts of war, civil disorders, or other similar acts, such Party shall not be held liable for such failure to comply.
SECTION VIII. AMENDMENTS
Any amendments, including but not limited to alterations, variations, or supplements, to the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by the Parties hereto, and shall have the approval of the Board of Supervisors of COUNTY and CITY’s City Council. Any amendments will be presented to CITY’s City Manager prior to CITY’s City Council approval.
This Agreement, including any exhibits, constitutes the entire Agreement of th e Parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous representations, proposals, discussions and communications, whether oral or in writing.
SECTION IX. SEVERABILITY
Each paragraph or provision of this AGREEMENT is severable from each other provision, and if any provision or part thereof is declared invalid, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect.
6 SECTION X. RECORDS
COUNTY shall maintain and keep records of all expenditures and obligations incurred pursuant to this Agreement and all income and fees received thereby according to generally recognized accounting principles. Such records and/or animal control operations of COUNTY shall be open to inspection and audit by CITY or its authorized representative as is deemed necessary by the CITY’s City Manager, or designated representative, upon written notice to COUNTY.
SECTION XI. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
This Agreement between the Parties is intended for the mutual benefit of the two signing Parties only. No rights are created under this Agreement in favor of any third party or any party who is not a direct signatory to this Agreement.
SECTION XII. NONDISCRIMINATION
COUNTY shall not discriminate in the provision of services, al location of benefits, accommodation in facilities, or employment of personnel on the basis of race, ethnicity, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, sexual or ientation, or gender identity in the performance of this Agreement; and, to the extent they shall be found to be applicable hereto, shall comply with the provisions of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code 12900 et. seq.), the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352) and the Americans with Disability Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.).
SECTION XIII. DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND VENUE
A. The Parties shall attempt to resolve any disputes amicably at a working level. If that is not successful, the dispute shall be referred to the senior management of the Parties.
B. Prior to filing any legal action related to this Agreement, the Parties shall be obligated to attend a mediation session in Riverside County before a neutral third party medi ator. A second mediation session shall be required if the first session is not successful. The Parties shall share the cost of the mediations.
C. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action related to the performance or interpretation of this Agreement shall be filed only in the Superior Court of the State of California located in Riverside, California, and the Parties waive any and all provisions of law providing for a change of venue to another location.
SECTION XIV. ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement shall be binding upon COUNTY and its successors. Neither this Agreement nor any part thereof nor any moneys due or to become due hereunder may be assigned by the Parties without the prior written consent of the other Party. CITY and COUNTY hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants contained herein.
7 SECTION XV. NOTICES
All correspondence and notices required or contemplated by this Agreement shall be delivered to the respective Parties at the addresses set forth below and are deemed submitted two (2) days after their deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid:
COUNTY:
Department of Animal Services
Attention: Director
6851 Van Buren Boulevard
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
CITY:
City of Jurupa Valley
Attention: City Manager
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Or to such other addresses as the parties may hereinafter designate in writing.
SECTION XVI. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE AND ADMINISTRATION
COUNTY’s Director of Department of Animal Services, or designated representative, is designated as the Contract Administrator and will meet as necessary to discuss contract performance with CITY’s City Manager, or designated representative.
SECTION XVII. HEADINGS
The Section and other headings contained in this Agreement are included for the purpose of convenient reference only and shall not restrict, amplify, modify or otherwise affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement or the exhibits and schedules hereto.
SECTION XVIII. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement, binding on all of the Parties.
SECTION XIX. WAIVER OF BREACH, RIGHT OR REMEDY
The waiver by any Party of any breach or violation by another Party of any provision of this Agreement or of any right or remedy permitted the waiving Party in this Agreement (a) shall not waive or be construed to waive any subsequent breach or violation of the same provision, (b) shall not waive or be construed to waive a breach of violation of any other provision, and (c) shall be in writing and may not be presumed or inferred from any Party’s cond uct. Except as expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement, no remedy conferred by this Agreement is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every remedy shall be in addition to every other remedy granting in this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity, by statute or otherwise. The election of any one or more remedies by a Party shall not constitute a waiver of the right to pursue other available remedies.
8 SECTION XX. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The COUNTY is acting as an independent contractor to the CITY under this Agreement. Each Party to this Agreement shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of another Party to this Agreement.
SECTION XXI. COOPERATION, FURTHER ACT
The Parties shall cooperate fully with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
a Political Subdivision of
the State of California
By:___________________________
Kevin Jeffries, Chairperson
Board of Supervisors
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
a General Law City
By:__________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kimberly Rector
Clerk of the Board
By:___________________________
Deputy
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
By:___________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Minh C. Tran
County Counsel
By:___________________________
Ryan Yabko
Deputy County Counsel
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
A-1
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF ANIMAL FIELD SERVICES
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
The County of Riverside, on behalf of its Department of Animal Services (“COUNTY”), agrees to provide the following animal field services for the City of Jurupa Valley (“CITY”):
A. PROVISION OF FIELD SERVICES
The animal field services to be provided by COUNTY for CITY within the corporate jurisdictional limits of CITY shall include the following activities:
1. Field Service Assistance : Respond to calls for field service assistance pursuant to the priority of calls as described in Section E below.
2. Impoundment: Impound dogs and livestock found at large and collect such impound fees as established in the appropriate CITY municipal code.
3. Proper Care and Treatment : Provide humane care and treatment to any stray or abandoned animal impounded by field personnel in accordance with State of California (“State”) laws and regulations.
4. Animal Bites: Investigate reported bites by animals. COUNTY shall respond in person to all reported bites by animals or by suspected rabid or wild animals. CITY shall be responsible for any appeals arising from administrative proceedings resulting therefrom.
5. Quarantine: Quarantine all animals suspected to be rabid and/or that have bitten a person as prescribed by the California Compendium of Rabies Control and Prevention, the State law, and COUNTY policy.
6. Stray and Barking Animal (Nuisance) Complaints : Respond to and process nuisance complaints, including stray and barking animal complaints, as referenced the appropriate CITY Municipal Code. City shall be responsible for any appeals arising from administrative proceedings resulting therefrom.
7. Dead Animals: Remove dead animals from the public right -of-way except in such cases where an animal is on a state highway within CITY limits. In such cases, COUNTY shall immediately (or as soon as practicable) notify the State Department of Transportation by telephone, facsimile, email or other means.
8. Return of Impounded Animals: Encourage the return of any lost/stray animal impounded by field personnel while in the field to the rightful owner and at the shelter, subject to the payment of impound fees.
9. Kennels and Catteries: COUNTY shall inspect and issue licenses to operate dog kennels and catteries within CITY jurisdictional limits pursuant to CITY’s municipal codes, and A-2
collect fees in connection therewith. All fees for licenses to operate dog kennels and catteries shall be retained by COUNTY.
10. Issuance of Warnings and Citations : Perform enforcement activities for all applicable provisions of CITY’s municipal code as necessary, including the issuance of warning notices or citations, for violations of the provisions of said municipal code. CITY shall be responsible for the prosecution of any criminal enforcement actions or any appeals arising from administrative proceedings resulting therefrom.
11. Service to Public : Provide service to the public on matters covered in this Agreement consistent with established policies and procedures that promote courteous and efficient service and good public relations. Other policies and procedures notwithstanding, COUNTY, in processing any type of complaint or request for service, shall indicate to the caller that a response can be expected as per Section E below.
12. Field Services Related to Canine Licenses : COUNTY shall verify canine license status when responding to requests for service or when responding to complaints about animal behavior. The Animal Control Officer, as part of the officer's regular animal control duties as defined by, but not limited to, the terms of this Agreement, shall conduct license inspection activities during animal control investigations to ascertain the number of unlicensed dogs, to license such dogs, and to promote and foster compliance with CITY’s municipal code.
13. Wildlife: COUNTY will not impound free roaming wildlife unless it is a danger to the community, unhealthy, injured, or part of an animal cruelty or animal bite case.
14. Mutual Animal Welfare Programs: If mutually agreeable between the Parties, COUNTY and CITY shall work together to establish animal welfare programs that benefit the animals and residents of CITY.
15. COUNTY will perform humane investigations of suspected animal neglect and cruelty and will be responsible for investigation, citation and preparing materials for prosecution.
16. COUNTY and CITY will work together on educational outreach, promotion of spay/neuter and vaccination clinics, other owner surrender diver sion program, responsible pet ownership and adoption programs and activities.
17. In case of a disaster, COUNTY and CITY will work collaboratively on animal needs and communication as it relates to rescue, response and recovery efforts.
B. SHELTER CARE AND DISPOSITION SERVICES
The COUNTY shall house CITY’s animals at the Western Riverside City/County Animal Shelter, or other County operated shelter at the County’s discretion, as set forth in Exhibit B.
A-3
C. PROVISION OF VEHICLES AND RADIO EQUIPMENT
COUNTY shall provide animal control vehicles and equip them with the appropriate animal control boxes mounted on the truck chassis and with an air conditioning unit mounted on the animal control truck boxes for use in the provision of services as set forth in this Agreement. The COUNTY shall fuel and maintain said vehicles.
D. MISSING OR STOLEN ANIMALS
COUNTY shall file a report with the appropriate law enforcement agency within twenty four (24) hours if an impounded animal is missing or suspected to have been stolen from an animal control vehicle or while in COUNTY’s custody. COUNTY shall indicate on the police report the circumstances of the animal's disappearance.
E. PRIORITY OF FIELD SERVICES
1. “Services” are those enforcement activities rendered by COUNTY pursuant to the relevant sections of CITY’s municipal code and related State law , and are assembled for into two categories: Emergency and Non-Emergency.
2. “Priority Ranking” refers to the order of priority with which a call will be handled. All calls will go directly to the dispatcher or assigned clerical staff for relay to the Animal Control Officer. If a call is “exceptional,” a set forth in Section F below, it shall be referred to the supervisor for evaluation and processing.
3. The following definitions of “Regular Service Hours,” “Limited Service Hours” and “Holidays” are intended to identify the broad time frames during which specific levels of service will be provided.
a. “Regular Service Hours” are between the hours of 7:30 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, Holidays excepted.
b. “Limited Service Hours” are between the hours of 5:00 pm to 7:30 am, Monday through Friday, all day Saturday, Sunday and on Holidays.
c. “Holidays” are those days as established by the COUNTY and the CITY where the CITY or COUNTY is closed for service on a business day that would otherwise be a regular service day.
4. Field service activities shall be performed daily and generally based on both the Priority Ranking and the time a call for service is received in accordance with this Agreement. All calls involving imminent danger shall be responded to within sixty (60) minutes if reasonably possible, subject to considerations involving the time of day, traffic conditions, or other circumstances. An Animal Control Officer shall respond to animal medical emergencies and other emergencies involving danger to humans within thirty (30) minutes or less during Regular Service Hours, and within sixty (60) minutes or less during Limited A-4
Service Hours and Holidays. CITY acknowledges that response time may be affected by traffic congestion or other hindering circumstances uncontrollable by COUNTY.
COUNTY shall provide a means for responding to calls fo r service that take place during Limited Service Hours which are of an emergent nature pursuant to this Exhibit A. Field service personnel may be assigned to patrol and perform other service field tasks as defined by COUNTY and CITY.
5. Telephone Service : The COUNTY shall answer all telephone calls for field services during Regular Service Hours. Calls shall be received by the COUNTY answering service during Limited Service Hours and on Holidays, as noted above. Calls answered by the answering service wi ll be handled on an emergency basis as outlined in this Exhibit A.
The dispatcher and/or clerical support staff shall maintain a detailed record of all requests for service, both emergency and routine, received during Regular Service Hours and Limited Service Hours, including time and date, when the calls were answered, and the disposition of those calls. Records of these calls shall be maintained for at least thirty (30) days.
6. The CITY and COUNTY agree that any incident reports to the COUNTY by reside nts or through emergency services involving a dangerous, aggressive, injured or sick animal constitute an emergency and require immediate action by the COUNTY pursuant to this Agreement. Calls for service received during Limited Service Hours that are not of an emergent nature shall be answered by an answering service and referred to call-back on the next business day during phone center operational hours. These calls will then be scheduled for response in accordance with this Exhibit A.
7. Calls Considered Emergencies to be Handled Without Delay:
a. Animals endangering health or safety of the community b. Police Department requests for service
c. Sick or injured stray animals
d. Animals in distress
e. Humane investigations that are life threatening. (Depending on immediate circumstances)
8. Calls Considered Non-Emergency to be Handled during Regular Service Hours:
a. Pick-up confined, healthy, stray-animals
b. Dead animal removal
c. Quarantine investigations
d. Leash law enforcement
e. Nuisance animal investigations
f. Permit investigations
F. EXCEPTIONS
The Director of Animal Control, or designee, may, on a case-by-case basis, authorize variations of priority when circumstances require such a variance.
A-5
G. LICENSE FEES (Section 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 630)
Licenses shall be issued upon payment of the license fees at the same rate as established in Section 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 630 and are subject to change as amended by COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors, from time to time.
H. RABIES VACCINATION CERTIFICATE DATA
Rabies vaccination certificates shall be collected from area veterinarians and downloaded into COUNTY’s database after the data has been cleared of inconsistencies. Reminders of licensing requirements shall be automatically generated and mailed to dog owners. Those dog owners who fail to comply may be subsequently issued administrative citations. Remittance options include the web licensing portal on COUNTY’s website , www.rcdas.org. COUNTY shall verify dog license status when responding to requests for service or when responding to complaints.
COUNTY shall also provide an automated or manual verification system whereby owners can verify the status of their animal’s license by telephone.
I. COLLECTION OF LICENSE FEES
CITY authorizes COUNTY to issue and collect the fees for canine licenses and retain ten dollars ($10) per license on any and all canine license revenue generated by CITY residents during the term of the Agreement. All fee s collected for canine licenses shall be accounted for by the COUNTY on a monthly basis and the COUNTY shall credit to CITY the net amount of license fees collected for each month. For purposes of this Agreement, the net amount of license fees shall mean the total amount of license fees collected in a month less the sum total of $10 per each canine license issued and shall be separate and apart from the monthly compensation rate due and payable by the CITY as required in Exhibit C, Payment Provisions. CITY shall be responsible for a one- time conversion fee for new data entered into COUNTY’s licensing database. ///
B-1
EXHIBIT B
SCOPE OF ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
The County of Riverside, on behalf of its Department of Animal Services (“COUNTY”), agrees to provide the following Animal Shelter Services for the City of Jurupa Valley (“CITY”). All capitalized terms set forth herein are defined in Section B below.
A. COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER LOCATION
1. Shelter Location: The COUNTY shall maintain CITY’s animals at the Western Riverside County/City Animal Shelter (“Shelter”), or other shelter operated by COUNTY at COUNTY’s discretion.
The COUNTY shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of its shelters and the care of the animals on a twenty four (24) hour basis.
2. Shelter Hours of Operation: COUNTY shall maintain hours of operation at the Shelter to provide maximum public access to the animals, to the extent possible.
B. DEFINITIONS
1. “Animal Shelter Services” shall include the following activities and services:
a. Impoundment, admittance, receipt of, care of, custody of and/or feeding of stray animals and as part of investigations.
b. Redemption, treatment, sale, adoption, and/or disposal of all animals. c. Counseling and advising animal owners.
d. Posting on Shelter’s website of photographs of all newly impounded animals and identifying each animal individually.
e. Ensuring that all dogs, four (4) months and older, released from the COUNTY to a resident of County of Riverside are licensed and spayed/neutered and, if not licensed, to sell license to the owner or other person taking custody of such dog. In accordance with COUNTY ordina nces, require the micro -chipping of released animals at the owner’s expense.
f. Humane euthanasia of animals as lawful and necessary, including the creation of a log detailing those animals that are euthanized and the reasons for such euthanasia on an animal -by-animal basis. This log shall include whether the animal was unhealthy and/or unsuitable for adoption.
g. Proper disposal of dead animals at the rate as set forth in Exhibit C, Payment Provisions.
h. “Care” includes, but is not limited to providing a safe, t emporary refuge for any animal impounded, and providing needed medical services for injured/sick animals or transfer of animal to the appropriate agency.
2. “Adoptable Animal” shall mean an animal eight (8) weeks of age or older that at or subsequent to the time the animal is impounded or taken into possession, has manifested no sign of disease, injury, or congenital or hereditary condition that adversely affects the B-2
health or temperament of the animal, or that is likely to adversely affect the animal’s health in the future. Dogs declared “vicious” or “potentially dangerous” under State and/or local laws shall be deemed unadoptable.
3. “Treatable” shall mean an animal with a medical condition such as skin problems, bad flea or skin infestations, a broken limb, ab scesses, or problems that may be treated with appropriate resources, holding space, treatment and/or time. “Treatable” shall also mean an animal with behavioral conditions that may be corrected with time and proper training, such as chasing animals/objects, food aggression, etc.
4. “Untreatable Animal” shall mean any animal that is irremediably suffering from a serious illness or physical injury or behavioral condition and shall not be held for owner redemption or adoption.
5. “Impounded Animal” shall include animals found running at large, removed from private property, or that are taken into the custody by COUNTY or law enforcement.
6. “Seized Animal” shall include animals that are confiscated under Penal Code 597.1 from an owner when ordered by a court of compe tent jurisdiction, whether the seizure was determined justified or not, when exigent circumstances exist.
C. SCOPE OF ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES
1. Treatment of Animals: COUNTY shall provide adequate care and treatment of CITY’s animals whiles in custody of COUNTY to ensure that impounded animals are provided with humane and appropriate levels of care, including a clean environment, fresh water, adequate nutrition and appropriate medical care.
2. Level of Service Provided: COUNTY shall provide Animal Shelter Services as defined in this Agreement. COUNTY’s policies and procedures for Animal Shelter Services shall be based on standards and/or guidelines derived from reputable animal care organizations including, but not limited to, the Humane Society of the United States, American Humane Association and American Veterinary Medical Association.
3. Feeding Protocols : All animals shall be fed in amounts appropriate to meet the ir nutritional needs.
4. Disease Control and Sanitation : COUNTY shall maintain the Shelter in a clean and sanitary condition. COUNTY’s policies and procedures may include beneficial standards and/or guidelines derived from reputable animal care organizati ons including, but not limited to, the Humane Society of the United States, American Humane Association and American Veterinary Medical Association.
5. Provision of Personnel and Supplies : COUNTY shall provide personnel, supplies, materials, medication, pha rmaceuticals, and equipment, including forms and reports, to perform all aspects of the Animal Shelter Services described herein.
6. Holding Periods: COUNTY shall hold all stray-impounded animals, not otherwise owner identifiable, for the holding periods as required by State law.
B-3
7. Euthanasia: Humane euthanasia services shall be provided as required for impounded animals held at the Shelter for the lawful number of days, if such animal is not reclaimed by the animal’s owner and is deemed not adoptable by COU NTY. Untreatable Animals that are irremediably suffering from a serious illness or severe injury may not be held for owner redemption or adoption. Only euthanasia methods approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association shall be used. Records sha ll be kept for a period of not less than three (3) years on each euthanized animal shall include the following information:
breed; sex; color; weight; other distinguishing characteristics; date, time and location where animal was found; method of euthanasia, and reason for use of method.
8. Quarantine: COUNTY shall quarantine, as prescribed by the California Compendium of Rabies Control and Prevention, State law, and COUNTY policy, all animals suspected of being rabid, or involved in a bite investigation.
9. Impoundments and Quarantines: COUNTY shall house, feed and care for all animals impounded and/or quarantined at the Shelter.
a. Animals Surrendered by their Owners: Owner Surrenders will be impounded on a case by case basis. Diversion programs will be offered to assist with pet retention.
10. Any pet surrendered by the owner to an Animal Control Officer and transported to the COUNTY shelter shall incur prevailing owner surrender charges. Such fees shall be collected from the owner and conveyed to the COUN TY, or be charged directly to the CITY at the established stray animal rate.
11. Wildlife. COUNTY will work with constituents to ensure public safety while maintaining wildlife in the wild. COUNTY will triage wildlife reports to determine the appropriate response. Wildlife will be impounded if there is a public safety hazard, if the animal’s welfare is at risk, if the animal is injured or orphaned, if the animal has been involved in a bite, or involved in an animal cruelty investigation.
12. Vicious and Potentially Dangerous Dogs: Any dog declared or determined to be vicious or potentially dangerous and in custody of COUNTY either under impoundment or quarantine shall be deemed unsuitable for adoption and shall not be released except as required by State law or at the Director of Animal Services’ discretion.
13. Incoming Animal Identification : Incoming animals shall be checked immediately for collar tags and scanned for microchip by qualified Shelter staff within one (1) hour of arrival to the Shelter. Shelter staff shall make all attempts to notify owners within twenty- four (24) hours of an Impounded Animal delivered by CITY to COUNTY.
14. Incoming Animal Examinations/Assessments: A cursory exam of an animal shall be performed within twelve (12) hours, exc ept during Limited Service Hours when the examination will be performed within twenty -four (24) hours. Incoming animal assessment shall include the following:
B-4
a. A physical examination to determine if a medical condition exists which requires a veterinarian’s attention
b. Routine vaccinations and de-worming, as needed
c. External parasite treatment, as needed
d. Document the animal’s incoming weight
e. Scan for microchip identification
f. Establish unique identifier for the animal
g. Document any identifying features or abnormalities. The COUNTY shall properly document on an animal -by-animal basis that an examination/assessment has been performed.
15. Enforcement: Enforce all relevant provisions of CITY’s municipal code and State law as may be applicable to animals housed, kept or maintained at the Shelter.
16. Adoption: Animals identified as being available for adoption shall be up for adoption in the shelter or by posting online.
17. Spay and Neuter: COUNTY shall ensure that all dogs and cats adopted from the Shelter are spayed or neutered, or that adequate provisions are made for such spaying or neutering if COUNTY transfers any animals, or if an adopted animal is unable to receive spaying or neutering due to a medical condition.
In accordance with California Food and Agricultural (“F& A”) Code Sections 30503 and 31751.3, if veterinarian employed at the Shelter certifies that a dog or cat is too sick or injured to be spayed or neutered, the COUNTY shall collect a spay/neuter deposit from the adopter or purchaser and this deposit shall be deposited into a segregated fund maintained by the COUNTY. The deposit shall be fully refunded to the adopter or purchaser if proof of sterility is provided within thirty (30) business days from the date of surgery, at which the deposit is forfeited in accordance with F&A Code Sections 30503 and 3175 1.3. Spay and neuter deposits shall only be used by the COUNTY for canine and feline spay and neuter programs.
18. Community Adoption Partners: COUNTY shall comply with F& A Code Sections 31108 and 31752 that provide that any stray dog or cat that is impounded “shall, prior to the euthanasia of that animal be released to a nonprofit, as defined in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, animal rescue or adoption organization if requested by the organization prior to the scheduled euthanasia of that animal. The public or private shelter may enter into cooperative agreements with any animal organization or adoption organization. In addition to any required spay or neuter deposit, the public or private shelter, at its discretion, may assess a fee, not to exceed the standard adoption fee, for animals adopted or released.”
19. Foster Care Placement: Certain animals may b e placed in COUNTY’s foster care placement program so to improve animal care, give certain animals a better chance of adoption, and lift the spirits and morale of staff and volunteers.
B-5
20. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) : COUNTY shall comply with all applicable Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) regulations regarding storage, record-keeping, inventory, use, and disposal of all controlled substances used in the ordinary course of its operations and services.
21. Staffing and Volunteers: COUNTY will staff and supervise all necessary personnel for the office, kennel, veterinary and other areas of the Shelter. Staffing shall include any and all full or part-time personnel and shall include the recruitment, supervision and assignment of volunteers in suitabl e Shelter-related activities. Personnel employed at the Shelter in the performance of Shelter -related activities shall be designated as COUNTY employees and any and all volunteers engaged in Shelter activities shall participate in activities designated by COUNTY and shall be under the auspices of COUNTY. Use of volunteers at the Shelter shall be determined by COUNTY.
22. Missing Animals: COUNTY shall notify an appropriate law enforcement agency immediately of any animal missing from the Shelter that had previously been impounded and/or in protective custody.
23. CITY Access: COUNTY shall provide access of the entire Shelter to the authorized representatives of CITY during Regular Service Hours or at such other times upon written notice.
24. Livestock and Fowl Care: COUNTY shall provide food, care and shelter to livestock and fowl, either at the Shelter or at another location, when such animals cannot be cared for at the Shelter.
Costs of housing any livestock or fowl, regardless of Shelter location shall be ch arged to the owner of the animal, if known. If the animal’s owner wishes to redeem the animal, the owner shall first pay all applicable fees and charges at the Shelter; except as otherwise required by law, then and only, will the COUNTY authorize release of the animal.
COUNTY shall notify CITY in writing when said expenses reach the amount of $5,000 or greater per incident. Such expenses shall not exceed the amount of $25,000 per incident unless authorized in writing by CITY.
25. Animal Disposal: COUNTY shall prohibit any animal whether dead or alive, which has been impounded, in custody, or in quarantine at the Shelter to be given away, disposed of, traded, sold or in any manner given over to another person, organization or entity for experimentation, regardless of purpose. COUNTY shall be responsible for the disposal of animal remains in its custody or control, subject to applicable State laws.
D. COMPENSATION
1. Compensation for Animal Shelter Services:
Additional compensation for Animal Shelter Services may be required. Additional costs for large animal sheltering are incurred at $20 per animal, per day for horses and cattle, and $12 per animal, per day for swine, goats and sheep in accordance with COUNTY’s B-6
Animal Control Ordinances and shall be billed based on actual sheltering on a monthly basis.
2. Impound/Quarantine Fees: CITY shall be responsible for all costs associated with any and all animals seized within the CITY boundaries and brought to COUNTY, which are held in Shelter, including facilities that have agreements with the COUNTY to provide additional shelter services under the supervision of the COUNTY. This includes, but is not limited to, animals held in association with any criminal prosecution of animal abuse and welfare cases, animals being held as evidence in a court filing, or rabies quarantine. The COUNTY agrees to assist the CITY in seeking reimbursement from the owner by providing invoices for all services provided. All services provided to each animal involved shall be charged as of the current date including but not limited to the following: IMP 1 - collection; State Fine 1 -collection, Board collection- all fees due; QT Board collection -if applicable; Rabies Vaccination collection- if applicable; DA2PPV collection; Bordatella collection; microchip collection; any and all medications provided to each animal; and personnel charges. All fees will be in accordance with the COUNTY’s current fee schedule.
3. Outreach Activities: CITY shall work with COUNTY to promote responsible pet ownership, lost and found animals, mutually agreeable animal welfare program , Spay/Neuter Services, and adoption of animals through its own educational outreach, and through its own social media pages. If requested by CITY, the daily flat rates for educational outreach events, vaccination clinics or spay/neuter clinics shall be billed based actual outreach days scheduled at a rates below:
a. Vaccination or Spay/Neuter Clinic: $3,000* per event, flat rate billed on actual use.
*The cost for staff, vaccinations and microchips, free to constituents with a two hundred (200) animal cap per event.
b. Education Outreach Event: $2,553* per event, flat rate billed on actual use. *The cost to staff an outreach event for the purpose of educating CITY constituents.
///
C-1
EXHIBIT C
PAYMENT PROVISIONS
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
City of Jurupa Valley (“CITY”) shall compensate the County of Riverside (“COUNTY”) on a monthly basis all fees and rates in accordance with the COUNTY’s current fee schedule as set forth below:
A. Animal Field and Sheltering Services Rates*
Service Impounds Amount Total Yearly Monthly
Installments
Animal Control Officer (two full-time) - $172,640 $345,280 $28,773 Animal Sheltering* 3,221 $20 per day $644,200 $53,683
Wildlife Impounds 147 $138 each $20,286 $1,691
Deceased Animal Pick-Up and
Disposal 745 $70 each $52,150 $4,346
Operation & Maintenance* 3,221 $12.53 each $40,359 $3,363 Total Sheltering Cost $1,102,275 $91,856
* Yearly cost estimate based on approximate impound rate of 3,221 stray dogs and cats per year, based on an average of ten (10) kenneling days. Rates are established by the Board of Supervisors and are subject to change as amended by COUNTY from time to time.
City shall be provided with actual impound statistics each month that detail the number of animals impounded and the number of kenneling days.
Large Animal Sheltering: $20/animal (horses, ponies, cattle) per day of sheltering.
Large Animal Sheltering: $12/animal (swine, goats, sheep) per day of sheltering.
B. Collection of License Fees
CITY authorizes COUNTY to issue and collect the fees for canine licenses and retain ten dollars ($10) per license on any and all canine license revenue generated by CITY residents during the term of the Agreement. All fees collected for canine licenses shall be accounted for by the COUNTY on a monthly basis and the COUNTY shall credit to CITY the net amount of license fees collected for each month. For purposes of this Agreement, the net amount of license fees shall mean the total amount of license fees collected in a month less the sum total of $10 per each canine license issued and shall be separate and apart from the monthly compensation rate due and payable by the CITY as set forth above in Section A.
C. Impound/Quarantine Fees
CITY shall be responsible for all costs associated with any and all animals seized within the CITY boundaries and brought to COUNTY held in the Shelter, including facilities that have agreements with the COUNTY to provide additional shelter services under the supervision of the COUNTY.
C-2
This includes, but is not limited to, animals held in association with any criminal prosecution of animal abuse and welfare cases, animals being held as evidence in a court filing, or rabies quarantine. The COUNTY agrees to assist the CITY in seeking reimbursement from the owner by providing invoices for all services provided. All services provided to each animal involved shall be charged as of the current date including but not limited to the following: IMP 1-collection; State Fine 1 -collection, Board collection - all fees due; QT Board collection -if applicable; Rabies Vaccination collection - if applicable; DA2PPV collection; Bordatella collection; microchip collection; any and all medications provided to each animal; and personnel charges.
D. Optional Services at City’s Request. If requested by CITY, the daily flat rates for optional services shall be billed based on actual outreach days scheduled at the rates below:
1. Vaccination or Spay/Neuter Clinic: $3,000 per event, flat ra te billed on actual use. The service provided herein shall be free to constituents, with a two hundred (200) animal cap per vaccination clinic, or thirty (30) spay and/or neuter surgeries per spay/neuter clinic.
2. Education Outreach Event: $2,553 per event, flat rate billed on actual use. The cost for staff an outreach event for the purpose of educating CITY constituents.
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.H
APP
ROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY AND STC TRAFFIC, INC. F OR ON -CALL
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
RECO
MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc. for On- Call Traffic Engineering Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.
BAC
KGROUND
O
n January 3, 2022, the City published a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for On- Call Traffic Engineering Services. The scope of work included performing tasks such as traffic engineering studies, traffic operations analysis, design services, and other related studies and surveys. At the end of the solicitation period, the City received a total of 11 responsive proposals. On April 7, 2022, the City Council approved an Agreement between the City and STC Traffic, Inc. (“STC”) to perform the traffic related servi ces. STC is a well- established full-service exclusive traffic engineering consulting firm.
The A
greement between the City and STC contained a not to exceed amount of $95,000.00 annually. Due to the high volume of development projects in the City, this amount was increased to $150,000.00 annually with the approval of the First Amendment on March 16, 2023.
ANAL
YSIS
ST
C is performing an array of services to numerous projects within a timely and efficient manner. The majority of the services that have been provided thus far were reimbursable
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
through development projects and capital improvement projects. For services that could not be charged to development accounts, $20,000.00 was allocated from the General Fund.
With the influx of development occurring throughout the City and Public Works projects, STC has been vital in providing traffic engineering services to keep projects in motion.
Due to the heavy workload, STC is approaching the not to exceed amount of $150,000.00.
For the City to continue rendering traffic engineering services, an amendment is needed to increase the not to exceed amount. The proposed Second Amendment will increase STC’s Agreement to $250,000.00 per fiscal year through the term of the Agreement. The impact to the General Fund is minimal as the funding will largely come from new development projects or capital improvement projects.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
If the Second Amendment is approved, the not to exceed amount will be increased to $250,000.00 per fiscal year throughout the term of the Agreement. The majority of services provided will continue to be reimbursed by new development projects or capital improvement projects.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not approve the Second Amendment.
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
-1-
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT
SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND STC
TRAFFIC, INC. FOR ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
This Second Amendment is made and effective as of June 15, 2023, between the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation (“City”) and STC Traffic, Inc. (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Second Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On April 7, 2022, the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled “AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND STC TRAFFIC, INC. FOR ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERIVCES.”
B. On March 16, 2023, the City and Consultant entered into that certain First Amendment to the original agreement, which increased the annual compensation to One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) for the total term of the Agreement.
C. The original Agreement as amended by the First Amendment shall be collectively referred to as the “Agreement.”
D. The City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
2. Section 4.A of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. PAYMENT
A. The City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payments as set forth in Exhibit B, Fee Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Two Hu ndred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) each fiscal year for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
5. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
-2-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and executed personally or on its behalf by its duly authorized representative.
STC TRAFFIC, INC.
By: _______________________________
Name:
Title:
By:________________________________
Name:
Title:
[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
A California Municipal Corporation
_______________________________
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Victoria Wasko
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.I
ADO
PTION OF THE LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2023/2024 FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1
RECOMMENDATION
1) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-42, entitled:
A RE
SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACC OUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
BAC
KGROUND
The C
ity’s street system connects over 45 square miles of r esidential, commercial, industrial, urban, rural and transitional uses. This network consists of over 300 centerline miles and more than 700 lane miles of streets that the City is responsible to maintain.
One of the main sources for roadway capital improvement projects is from Senate Bill 1 (SB1).
On April 28th, 2017, Governor Brown signed SB1, which created the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) to address deferred maintenance on the state highway and local streets and roads systems. SB1 requires the City to meet specific reporting and accountability requirements established by the California Transportation Commission (CTC).
ANALYSIS
The CTC Resolution G-18-08 specifies that prior to receiving an apportionment of RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the CTC a list of projects proposed to be completed with these funds. To receive the Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 RMRA funds, the City must submit a City Council- approved list of projects to the CTC by July 1, 2023 (Attachment A).
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
The City is expected to receive approximately $2,553,620 of RMRA funding in FY 2023/2024. There are three projects included in the FY 2023/2024 program year funded either in whole or partially with RMRA, shown below:
• Crestmore Road Pavement Rehabilitation
o Mission Boulevard to Loring Ranch Road
o Includes roughly 7,200 linear feet of pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction as well as signing and striping
o Estimated useful life of 15-20 years
Anticipated schedule: Complete construction by Spring 2024
• Etiwanda Ave Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation
o Philadelphia Street to Bellegrave Ave
o Includes roughly 12,400 linear feet of pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction as well as signing and striping
o Estimated useful life of 15-20 years
o Anticipated schedule: Complete construction by Spring 2024
• Mission Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation
o Riverview Drive to Crestmore Road
o Includes roughly 5,300 linear feet of pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction as well as signing and striping
o Estimated useful life of 15-20 years
Anticipated schedule: Complete construction by Spring 2024
The list may change if unforeseen conditions arise or new information regarding other street-related projects becomes available.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
These budgets do not require any General Fund monies.
ALTERNATIVES
1) Do not adopt Resolution No. 2023-42.
2) Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF P ROJECTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 202 3-24 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $2,553,620 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2023-24 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the fifth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate 1.1 centerline miles of pavement with one project throughout the City this year and many similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the City’s roads have an average pavement condition index (PCI) of 52 which is considered to be in “poor” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system over the next decade into a “fair” to “good” condition; and -2-
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting -edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. The following list of proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with fiscal year 2023-24 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
Crestmore Road Pavement Rehabilitation
o Mission Boulevard to Loring Ranch Road
o Includes roughly 7,200 linear feet of pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction as well as signing and striping
o Estimated useful life of 15-20 years
o Anticipated schedule: Complete construction by Spring 2024
Etiwanda Ave Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation
o Philadelphia Street to Bellegrave Ave
o Includes roughly 12,400 linear feet of pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction as well as signing and striping
o Estimated useful life of 15-20 years
o Anticipated schedule: Complete construction by Spring 2024
Mission Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation
o Riverview Drive to Crestmore Road
o Includes roughly 5,300 linear feet of pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction as well as signing and striping
o Estimated useful life of 15-20 years
o Anticipated schedule: Complete construction by Spring 2024
-3-
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of June, 2023.
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-4-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-42 was duly adopted and passed at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of June, 2023 by the following votes, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of June, 2023.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
120
S
TAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM 14.J
ACC
EPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE OF A STORM DRAIN LINE OVER
PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE APPALOOSA DEVELOPMENT (TR
37714) (FORESTAR (USA) REAL ESTATE GROUP INC.). NORTH OF VAN BUREN BLVD. AND SOUTH OF THE UNION PACIFIC
RAILROAD, NW CORNER OF APN 163-400-046
RECO
MMENDATION
I
t is recommended that the City Council:
1. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for the purpose of accessing the storm drain line over private property , as described on the attached Grant of Easement (DED22-006).
2. A
uthorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED22-006.
BACKGROUND
O
n November 4 2021, the Jurupa Valley City Council approved TTM No.37714 for Appaloosa Springs. A residential subdivision of 67.67 combined acres into 254 single family residential lots on 25.59 acres . The project site is located a 6501 Clay Street (APNS: 163- 400-001 & 052) and bounded by the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) right-of-way on the south.
O
n June 1 2023, the Jurupa Valley City Council approved an agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPPR) for the access and maintenance of t his storm line within the UPRR right- of-way.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
ANALYSIS
As part of extending utilities to the project site, a 36” storm drain pipe is required to be installed under the UPRR crossing inside a 48” steel casing, connecting offsite to Van Buren Boulevard. The applicant prepared a Grant of Easement document that provides the City of Jurupa Valley the rights to access the public storm drain line and the rights to use, maintain and operate the storm drain line. Exhibit B of the Grant of Easement (DED22-006) depicts the boundary of the proposed easement. S taff reviewed the documents, and found them in compliance with the California Government Code (7050) and local ordinances.
In anticipation of the acceptance of offer of easement dedications, staff prepared a Certificate of Acceptance as required by Government Code Section 27281. Acceptance of the offers of dedication will grant the City with the rights over such land to improve and maintain the public irrigation line.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no anticipated impact to the general fund.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action.
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
Page | 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Offer of Easement Dedication DED22-006 and Certificate of Acceptance
EXHIBIT “A”
DED 22-006
STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER, AND THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, AS PER SECTIONALIZED SURVEY OF THE JURUPA RANCHO, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGE 26 OF
MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID LAND ALSO SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF PARCEL MERGER NO. 1788, RECORDED FEBRUARY 2, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0048326, OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CLAY STREET, HAVING A NORTHWESTERLY HALF WIDTH OF 44.00 FEET, AND VAN BUREN BOULEVARD, HAVING A NORTHEASTERLY HALF WIDTH OF 75.00 FEET, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 18131, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 126, PAGES 30 THROUGH 32, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1400.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 58°49’51” EAST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°06’15”, AN ARC LENGTH OF 833.32 FEET;
THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID CENTERLINE OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD NORTH 24°43’36” EAST, 75.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID VAN BUREN
BOULEVARD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1475.00 FEET, SAID LINE IS RADIAL TO SAID POINT, ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE AND SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°57’05”, AN ARC LENGTH OF 24.49 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD NORTH 66°13’29” WEST, 2.89 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD SOUTH 76°22’32” EAST, 6.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13°37’28” EAST, 3.32 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES, AND SALT LAKE RAILWAYS COMPANY RECORDED AUGUST 5, 1903, IN BOOK 170, PAGE 252 OF
DEEDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON A NON- TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2914.93 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO THE BEGINNING OF SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE BEARS SOUTH 13°49’16” WEST;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE AND SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°23’35”, AN ARC LENGTH OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 13°37’28” WEST, 8.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID STORM WATER EASEMENT CONTAINS 133 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF RECORDS, IF ANY.
AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
_________________________________________
DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, PLS 8554 DATE
N.T.S.
TTM 37714
DARYL J. CHRISTIANLS 8554STATE OF CALIFORNIAPROFESSIONALLANDSURVEYOR P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S(949) 251-88215 PETERS CANYON ROADSUITE 305IRVINE, CA 92606WWW.MDSCONSULTING.NET PARCEL 1N.A.P.
PARCEL 2N.A.P.
APN: 163-400-046POR. W. 1/2 SEC. 25T. 2 S. R. 6 W. JURUPA RANCH 88'44'44'
75'
P.M.B. 126/30-32
PARCEL 3APN: 163-400-046
PARCEL 4N.A.P.PARCEL 5N.A.P.
P.M. NO. 18131
CERTIFICATE OF PARCELMERGER #1788DOC. #2009-48326(REC. 2-2-2009) CERTIFICATE OF PARCELMERGER #1788DOC. #2009-48326(REC. 2-2-2009) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD℄
P.O.C.
CLAY STREET
VAN BUREN BLVD
T.P.O.B.
℄
℄
50'50'100'DARYL J. CHRISTIANLS 8554STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROFESSIONALLANDSURVEYOR
198910
12 671811
16 17
P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S(949) 251-88215 PETERS CANYON ROADSUITE 305IRVINE, CA 92606WWW.MDSCONSULTING.NET
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
VAN BUREN BLVD
T.P.O.B.℄
75'
50'50'100'
DEED REC. 8-5-1903, BOOK170, PAGE 252 OF DEEDS
CERTIFICATE OF PARCELMERGER #1788DOC. # 2009-48326(REC. 2-2-2009) ℄T.P.O.B. 198910
P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S(949) 251-88215 PETERS CANYON ROADSUITE 305IRVINE, CA 92606WWW.MDSCONSULTING.NET P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S(949) 251-88215 PETERS CANYON ROADSUITE 305IRVINE, CA 92606WWW.MDSCONSULTING.NET P L A N N E R SE N G I N E E R S S U R V E Y O R S(949) 251-88215 PETERS CANYON ROADSUITE 305IRVINE, CA 92606WWW.MDSCONSULTING.NET
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn: City Clerk
Exempt: Government Code Section 6103
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
APN: 163-400-046
PUBLIC WATER IRRIGATION LINE RELATED PURPOSES EASEMENT
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Government Code Section 27281)
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property granted by the easement deed dated May 16, 2023 from the Grantor, Corona South Main Development, LP a California Limited Partnership , to the Grantee, CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a political subdivision, is hereby accepted for the purpose of accessing a public storm drain line , herein after called Access Easement, and an easement for the purpose of constructing, using, maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, replacing, reconstructing, inspecting and/or removing its facilities, pursuant to the authority granted to the undersigned as provided in Sections 1 and 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 669.1, as said ordinance was adopted by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Jurupa Valley Ordinance No. 11-10 adding Chapter
1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code , adopting by reference the ordinances of the County of Riverside as of July 1, 2011, the date of incorporation of the City of Jurupa Valley , as well as the resolutions, rules and r egulations of the County of Riverside implementing these ordinances . Grantee consents to the recordation of said easement by its duly authorized officer.
Dated: June 15, 2023
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ATTEST:
Paul Toor, PE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DAT
E: JUNE 15, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD B. BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: MICHAEL FLAD, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.K
AUT
HORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN AND APPROVAL OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF
FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES (FORMERLY FDAC
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AUTHORITY)
RECO
MMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-43, entitled:
A RESO
LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN AND
APPROVING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF
POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES
JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to executive all documents pursuant to the proposed agreement, including the ability to make minor non-substantive changes.
BACKGROUND
The Fi
re Districts Association of the California Employment Benefits Association (FDAC EBA) and Fire Agencies Self-Insurance System (FASIS) will consolidate, effective July 1, 2023, to form Fire Risk Management Services (FRMS). FRMS is a multi -line risk pool providing eligible fire districts and public agencies that provide emergency services employee benefits coverage and workers’ compensation to eligible fire districts in California.
The FD
AC EBA and FASIS Consolidation Advisory Committee has met regularly over the past twelve months to work toward streamlining the financial and administrative services via a consolidation of the two programs. At the Special Board of Directors Meeting on
RETURN TO AGENDA
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN AND
APPROVING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF
POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES
JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Fire Agencies Self Insurance System (FASIS) was formed in 1984 for the purpose of jointly funding losses and providing risk management services to reduce such losses by and among California fire protection and community services districts; and
WHEREAS, the FDAC Employment Benefits Authority (FDAC EBA) was formed in 2005 to establish, operate, manage, and administer health and welfare benefit programs for the benefit of the existing and retired officers, employees and members of the legislative body of the California public agencies who are members of FDAC EBA; and
WHEREAS, following the exploration and in-depth analysis of a strategic partnership, the Board of Directors of FASIS and FDAC EBA directed the merger of the two programs, effective July 1, 2023, to provide comprehensive and cost-effective coverage programs through a responsive risk pool for fire service agencies; and
WHEREAS, FASIS and FDAC EBA have agreed that FASIS will change its name to Fire Risk Management Services (FRMS) and adopt an amended and restated joint exercise of powers agreement, and that FDAC EBA will assign its rights and liabilities to FRMS and adopt the same agreement as its own; and
WHEREAS, the amended and restated agreement allows FRMS to operate the programs previously operated by both FDAC EBA and FASIS, and admit members that would have been eligible to join either FDAC EBA or FASIS in the past; and
WHEREAS, City of Jurupa Va lley is currently a member of FDAC EBA, and the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds it in the best interest of City of Jurupa Valley to continue participating in and obtaining self-insurance coverage services from FRMS program; and WHEREAS, FRMS requires the City of Jurupa Valley to pass a resolution expressing the desire and commitment of City of Jurupa Valley to approve the amended and restated joint exercise of powers agreement of FRMS and continue participation in FRMS, which requires a new three- year minimum participation period.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley approves the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for FRMS, as presented; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to sign the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement that shall enable the City of Jurupa Valley to continue participating in the joint self-insurance programs provided by FRMS. -2-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of June, 2023.
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-3-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023 -43 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 1 5th day of June, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 1 5th day of June, 2023.
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DAT
E: JUNE 15, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.L
INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO: 1) AMEND TABLE 2-4 ‘SUMMARY OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS’ TO ADD MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES; 2)
AMEND TABLE 2-5 ‘GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND CONSISTENT ZONE DISTRICTS’ TO CORRECT INACCURACIES; AND 3) MAKE OTHER MINOR EDITS AND CORRECTIONS
RECO
MMENDATION
That t
he City Council initiate a General Plan Technical Amendment to: 1) amend Table 2-4 ‘Summary of General Plan Land Use Designations’ to add minimum residential densities; 2) amend Table 2-5 ‘General Plan Land Use Designations and Consistent Zone Districts’ to correct inaccuracies; and 2) make other minor edits and corrections.
BAC
KGROUND
The C
ity’s first General Plan was adopted by the City Council on September 7, 2017.
Adoption of the General Plan was the culmination of over two years of public input, research, analysis and deliberation which resulted in a robust planning document tailored to the City’s unique characteristics and circumstances. The General Plan consists of 10 chapters or “elements” that cover major planning topics. In addition to the seven State- mandated elements (Land Use, Mobility, Housing, Conservation, Open Space, Safety and Noise), the General Plan includes five “optional” elements: Community Services and Facilities (combined with the Safety Element), Air Quality, Environmental Justice, Healthy Communities, and Economic Sustainability.
Fr
om time to time, amendments to the General Plan are needed to reflect specific issues in the community. The City Council has approved several amendments to the General Plan since adoption, including amendments to change the land use designations on specific properties and a comprehensive update to the Housing Element in December of 2021.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
As outlined in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.30.040, “Technical” General Plan Amendments “involve changes of a technical nature including, without limitation:
statistical corrections; mapping error corrections; changes in spheres of influence and city boundaries; changes in Communities of Interest; editorial clarifications that do not change the intent of the General Plan’ or appendix information useful in interpreting the General Plan but which does not change the General Plan intent.” Like other General Plan Amendments, Technical General Plan Amendments are subject to Section 9.30.040.B, Initiation of Amendment Proceedings, which provides that the City Council may adopt an order to initiate General Plan Amendment proceedings at any time and that such an order shall not require a public hearing and shall not imply that any such amendment will be approved.
ANALYSIS
The City has identified a number of corrections, clarifications and editorial edits to the General Plan which require initiation of a General Plan Technical Amendment. Proposed amendments include amendments to Tables 2- 4 and 2- 5, as well as other editorial corrections and clarifications as described below.
Table 2-4 – Summary of General Plan Land Use Designations
Table 2-4 of the General Plan includes a comprehensive listing of all of the land use designations in the City, including the maximum density allowed for each residential designation, the floor area ratio allowed for non-residential designation, and other notes and information.
The 2021-2029 Housing Element includes Action Item 1.1.8 which requires the City to update General Plan density provisions to establish minimum density requirements in addition to maximum densities. This was included at the reques t of the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prevent low-density development in areas planned for higher density and ensure consistency with State law. Thus, amendments to Table 2- 4 are proposed to add minimum density thresholds to each residential land use category thereby creating density ‘ranges’ that proposed development must achieve.
Table 2-5 - General Plan Land Use Designations and Consistent Zone Districts
Table 2-5 includes a summary of the City’s land use designations and identifies which zones are consistent with each designation. However, one designation is missing and several consistent zones are not included with the appropriate land use designations. Modifications are proposed to correct the inaccuracies and include the missing designation and zones.
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.M
RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89 -1 CONSOLIDATED ( JV L&LMD NO. 89 -1-C) -
CITYWIDE
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-47, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE E NGINEER’S REPORT REG ARDING PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023- 24 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M , N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; DD, EE, FF, II AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 9 3, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F AND 2-G OF CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSC APE AND LIGHTING MAI NTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1- CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE L ANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
2) That the City Council adopt Resolution No 2023-48, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21 , 34, 61, 73, 78, 95 , 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; DD, EE, FF, II AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2 -B, 2 -C, 2 -D, 2-E, 2 -F AND 2 -G OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y LANDSCAPING AND LIGH TING MAINTENANCE DIS TRICT NO. 89 -1-
CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAP ING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE MAIN TENANCE AND SERVICIN G OF LANDSCAPING,
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
MULTI-PURPOSE TRAILS , FENCING, FOSSIL FI LTERS, BIO -SWALES,
GRAFFITI ABATEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BRIDGE LIGHTS, AND STREET LIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24; AND GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING
THE TIME AND PLACE O F THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT AND ORDER ING NOTICE OF THE PU BLIC HEARING TO BE
PUBLISHED
BACKGROUND
Upon incorporation on July 1, 2011, the City of Jurupa Valley assumed the responsibility for certain L&LMD No. 89 -1-C zones now within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. As such, the City is now responsible for the services and charges provided by L&LMD No. 89-1-C zones within its boundaries.
On February 4, 201 6, the City adopted Resolution 2016 -01, which clarified the City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-C (JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C) is separate and distinct from the County of Riverside Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-C. JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C maintains and services 77 locations throughout the City of Jurupa Valley . The District contains 47 landscaping assessment zones and 21 street lighting assessment zones as described in Attachment A. The annual levy of asses sments on the parcels within the boundaries of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is consistent with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
ANALYSIS
Adoption of Resolution Nos. 2023-47 and 2023-48 will allow the City of Jurupa Valley to collect funds to maintain this Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District.
Consistent with the City Council’s direction regarding compliance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the attached resolutions have been prepared and a public hearing scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on July 6, 2023 to receive testimony for and against the proposed assessments.
OTHER INFORMATION
Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69 are not yet maintained and assessed. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor Controller’s Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
Zone P, Zone W, Zone Y, Zone DD, Zone EE, Zone FF, Zone II and Street lighting Zone 2-G are expected to start maintenance in Fiscal Year 2023-2024.
Page | 3
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The annual budget for fiscal year 2023-24 totals $2,168,682.
As a matter of urgency this item must appear on the June 15, 2023 City Council agenda in order to set the July 6, 2023 public hearing; failure to do so will result in loss of District revenue for FY 2023-24 for the maintenance of landscaping, trails, fencing, fossil filters and street lights within certain areas of the City of Jurupa Valley.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action. This would mean that the City of Jurupa Valley could not continue collecting assessments to pay for maintenance of improvements in these specific rights-of-way and would need to discontinue (a) the maintenance of landscaping, trails, fencing, and irrigation services to these areas, in certain zones, (b) maintaining the fossil filters in certain zones as required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Con trol Board regarding compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and (c) paying Edison for street light energy costs in certain zones.
2. Provide staff with further direction.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEER’S REPORT VOLUME 1
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF AND II.
June 2023
PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
600 B
Street, Suite 2000
San Diego, CA 92101
619
-
236
-
1778
www.weareharris.com
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of Assessment Engineer ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 1 Backround ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .3 Part I – Plans and Specifications ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .4 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 B. ASSESSMENT UNITS: .................................................................................................................................................. 5 C. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES .................................................................................................... 5 D. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS PER ZONE ........................................................................................................... 6 E. MAINTENANCE PLANS ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Part II – Method of Apportionment ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 13 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 SPECIAL BENEFIT ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 GENERAL BENEFIT ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 16 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE ............................................................................................................................................... 16 Part IV – Assessment Diagrams ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 17 Part V – Assessment Rolls ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...........1
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
PROJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) – CITYWIDE
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023–2024
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,
DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) was prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum
The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:
Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Sec tion 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and article of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
2 I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.
Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications
2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.
3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside Count y Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Zones 4,5, 6,7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that w ill benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.
5. As of the date of this report, there is one parcel within Zone 4 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Valley.
Parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Number 163-042-043 is the location of Jurupa Valley City Hall. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots do not benefit from the maintained improvements.
6. As of the date of this report, there is three parcels within Zone 16 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Valley. Parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Numbers 181052017, 181052018, and 181052004 correspond to the location of Jurupa Valley Operation Center. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots do not benefit from the maintained improvements.
In conclusion,
DATED this 7th day of June, 2023.
Alison M. Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Riverside
State of California
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Backround
This combined Annual Engineer’s Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all annual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.
The 1972 Act provides for the annual lev y of assessments for the Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C, for the express purpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing of the following:
• Landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation; Statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures;
• Public lighting facilities, including traffic signals; • Appurtenant facilities necessary for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including walls, sidewalks, and removal of debris; and
• Maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing, including the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments for an ass essment district after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provisions in Proposition 218.
The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. Th is resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.
The Report prepared by the engineer must include maintenance plans for the improvements. The Report must also include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District, and an assessment of the estimat ed costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots which benefit from the improvements. Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved.
Once the Report i s completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
4 improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.
In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners of the assessed parcels must approve any new or increased assessments. Zones included in this Report have been previously approved by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.
Part I – Plans and Specifications
A. INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Assessment Zone means the zones which include landscaping, water quality, streetlighting and other co mbinations of improvements. Street lighting Zone means a zone that only includes streetlighting improvements which includes streetlights and traffic signals.
There are 77 locations within the District: 47 separate assessment zones with 56 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 21 street lighting assessment zones with 21 locations.
There are 59 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (17) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consists of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F , Z, DD and Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on seven (7) locations within the District on Fiscal Year 2023-2024; these locations are in Assessment District Zone G, P, W, Y, EE, FF, II and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 68 existing Zones (77 locations). New or pending Zones will be presented to the City Council under separate reports.
Total number of Zones/Locations: 68 (77 locations)
Assessment Zones: 47 (56 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 21 (21 locations)
Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 55 within 47 Assessment Zones Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Locations (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 21 – within 15 Assessment Zones.
The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:
Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
5 Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G.
B. ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, Z, DD, II; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.
Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, EE, FF; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F
EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.
Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Locations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zone 137, Zone 17 3, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone F, Zone G, Zone I, Zone K, Zone L, Zone M, Zone N, Zone O, Zone P, Zone R, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone W, Zone X, Zone Y and Zone Z; and Street Lighting Zone 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 15, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, Street Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, Street Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2 -A, Street Lighting Zone 2 -B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, Street Lighting Zone 2-E, Street Lighting Zone 2-F and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements not yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, and Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
C. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities (also referred herein to as “streetlighting" or “traffic signals” ), and appurtenant facilities, including walls (also referred herein to as “fencing”), sidewalks (also referred herein to as “multi purpose trail”), and debris removal facilities (also referred herein to as “bio-swales” or “fossil filters”) are located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, spraying, fertilizing, or treatment for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
6 Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel , power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.
D. Description of Improvements per Zone
Zone 4:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 4 generally includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fence, dog park, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Zone 5:
Maintenance of impr ovements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Zone 6:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 6 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue
Zone 7:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
7 Etiwanda Avenue Van Buren Boulevard
Zone 9:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 9 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Country Village Road Philadelphia Avenue Zone 14:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 14 generally includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Armstrong Road Sierra Avenue
Zone 16:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 16 generally includes landscaping, streetlight, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Crestmore Road Mission Boulevard
Zone 17:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 17 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Etiwanda Avenue Iberia Street
Zone 21:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 21 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Castlerock Road Galena Street Rutile Street Zone 34:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 34 generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Lakeside Drive
Zone 61:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 61 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Cydney Circle Halbrook Ter
Zone 73:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 73 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Viaggio Circle
Zone 78:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 78 generally includes fossil filter and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
65th Street Limonite Avenue Pats Ranch Road Zone 95:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 95 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
54th Street
Zone 102:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 102 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Armstrong Road
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
8 Zone 106:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 106 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Country Village Road
Zone 126:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 126 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Harrell Street
Zone 128:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 128 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Granite Hill Drive
Zone 132:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 132 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20TH Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 137:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 137 generally includes fossil filter, streetlight, and , traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bain Street Bellegrave Avenue Birtcher Drive Zone 141:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 141 generally includes landscaping, bio -swale, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
A Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 142:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 142 general ly includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fencing, fossil filter, traffic signal, and future bio-swale and graffiti abatement improvements within public right-of-ways of:
63rd Street Limonite Ave. Lucretia Ave. Wineville Rd.
Zone 173:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 173 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Caden Way/Project Driveway Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road I-15 on/off ramp Wineville Road
Zone 182:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 182 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Wineville Road Mission Boulevard
Zone A:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone A generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Limonite Avenue Median
Zone C:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone C generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
9 Limonite Avenue Felspar Street
Zone E:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone E generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue El Rivino Road
Zone F:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone F generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Pedley Road Golondrina Street
Zone G:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone G generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Avalon Street 36th Street
Zone I:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone I generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue Etiwanda Avenue
Zone K:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone K generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Jurupa Road Pyrite Street
Zone L:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone L generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard 42nd Street
Zone M:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone M generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Riverside Drive Etiwanda Avenue
Zone N:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone N generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard 26th Street
Zone O:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone O generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Avlis Lane Viaggio Circle
Zone P:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone P generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Ben Nevis Road Pedley Street
Zone S:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone S generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Pats Ranch Road 68th Street
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
10 Zone T:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone T generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone U:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone U generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard Avalon Street
Zone W
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone W generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within the public right-of-ways of:
Hudson Street 59th St 60th Street White Willow Lane Black Thorn Street Zone X
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone X generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Etiwanda Avenue Parkhurst Street Zone Y:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone Y generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue Market Street 24th Street
Zone Z:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone Z generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard El Rivino Road Hall Street Zone DD:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone DD generally includes landscaping (median and parkway) improvements and capital improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue Agua Mansa Road
Zone EE:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone EE generally includes landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Van Buren Boulevard
Zone FF:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone FF generally includes landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Mission Boulevard Brotchie Lane Hobbs Court Agate Street
Zone II:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone II generally includes landscaping (median and parkway), streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Mission Boulevard Pyrite Street
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
11 E. MAINTENANCE PLANS
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are voluminous and are not bound in this Report but by this reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection. Copies are available in the office of the Riverside County Transportation Department, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. See the list below for plan numbers. Reduced maps of the maintained improvements are filled in Part IV of this Report; see Assessment Diagrams.
The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:
ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone A GP14-020/IP14-007
Zone C GP16-025/IP16-012
Zone E GP16-043/IP16-019
Zone F GP16-040/IP16-016
Zone G GP17-025/IP17-006
Zone I LD17-569/IP17-010
Zone K LD18-229/IP13-006
Zone L LD17-351/IP17-003
Zone M LD18-642/IP18-008
Zone N LD19-162/IP18-011
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
12 Zone O GP17-034/IP16-001
Zone P Zone P/IP19-005
Zone S Zone S/IP19-006
Zone T Zone T/IP20-009
Zone U Zone U/IP21-001
Zone W
Zone X Zone X/IP19-008
Zone Y
Zone Z Zone Z/IP21-002
Zone DD
Zone EE
Zone FF
Zone II
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
13 PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Part II – Method of Apportionment
INTRODUCTION
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district ma y be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.
In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Constitution (“Article”) requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property withinthe district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilitiesprovides direct and special benefit to those properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).
Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.
In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the District by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
14 located throughout the properties within the District. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign right -ofways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.
Landscaping, Ornamental Structures, and Appurtenant Facilties
The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets.
Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping , graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the District. This provides a positive visual experience and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the District.
Public Lighting Facilities
Streets provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District.
Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, a nd comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility. Provision of a well lit roadway prevents damage to properties in the district from traffic accidents from poor visibility at night. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District.
Traffic signal assessments are based on traffic studies and/or trip counts. For specific zone benefits, see Part III Estimate of Costs and Expenses.
Summary
Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties, are apportioned on a per acre, per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), or per parcel basis.
Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government-owned easements, utility easements, or flood channel parcels. Government-owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedest rian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not receive any benefi t from landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties and are not assessed.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
15 Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; • The installation or construction of statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities; • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not limited to, traffic signals; • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks o r paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and;
• The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.
GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties maintenance costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from other City Funds. Because the landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties improvements are located immediately adjacent to properties within the District and are maintained solely for the benefit of the properties within the District, any benefit received by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit. As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.
However, some traffic signal improvements provide general and specific benefit. It was previously determined that the costs and expenses for the traffic signal improvements are less than the County’s total maintenance cost. Percentages of the County’s total maintenance costs were previously determined from budgets at the time of annexation by Riverside County Transportation Department. These percentages are noted on the applicable Fiscal Year 20 23–2024 budgets for those Zones with traffic signal improvements in Part III, Estimate of Costs and Expenses. Therefore, only the costs directly related to the specific benefit of the traffic signal improvements will be assessed to the applicable Zones.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
16 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES
Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses
INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.
The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire fiscal year (2023-2024), including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.
The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.
The inflation factor, for those zones with an inflation factor in place, may increase budgets for Zones, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed. However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.
Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 173, may be subject to an annual adjustment of two percent and the maximum assessment for Zones 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for All Items or the CPI-U for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario County CaliforniaStandard Metropolitan Statistical area or, as implemented on Decembe r 2017, Riverside -San Bernardino-Ontario
Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The annual CPI-U for All Items or CPI -U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI-U for All Items, or CPI-U for Electricity annual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property ow ners within each of the benefit zones in the District.
BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained during fiscal year 20 23-2024 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditures, CPI-U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:
1. LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone dated 05/19/2023; CFDLLMD 22-23 YEAR END
ESTIMATES
The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 were prepared for this report:
(See next page)
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected NO. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence $126,292.57 6483.36 $19.48
Water $153,334.87 6483.36 $23.65
Backflow Certification $478.67 6483.36 $0.07
Tree Trimming $30,803.07 6483.36 $4.75
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $13,522.35 6483.36 $2.09
Electricity $19,042.79 6483.36 $2.94
Field Inspection/Management $40,175.15 6483.36 $6.20
Repair and Replacement $23,454.83 6483.36 $3.62
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $407,104.30 Cost Per EDU $62.79 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $35,796.62 6483.36 $5.52
Contingency $42,113.68 6483.36 $6.50
Total Incidental Costs $77,910.30 Cost Per EDU $12.02
Total Projected Costs $485,014.60 Cost Per EDU $74.81
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $234,293.42
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$36.14
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$234,293.42
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$36.14
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($250,721.18)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 4 (68-1536)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 12,182.67 1409 $8.65
Water 4,172.60 1409 $2.96
Backflow Certification 24.43 1409 $0.02
Tree Trimming 21,658.06 1409 $15.37
Field Inspection/Management 4,423.94 1409 $3.14
Repair and Replacement 2,418.45 1409 $1.72
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $44,880.15 Cost Per Parcel $31.85 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $3,814.81 1409 $2.71
Contingency $4,488.01 1409 $3.19
Total Incidental Costs $8,302.82 Cost Per Parcel $5.89
Total Projected Costs $53,182.97 Cost Per Parcel $37.75 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $79,338.15
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$56.30
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$79,338.15
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$56.30
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $26,155.18
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $128,632.69 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $26,155.18
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$154,787.87
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 5 (68-1537)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence 4,106.53 30 $136.88
Water 935.11 30 $31.17
Backflow Certification 229.40 30 $7.65
Electricity 604.08 30 $20.14
Field Inspection/Management 667.26 30 $22.24
Repair and Replacement 1,501.03 30 $50.03
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $8,043.41 Cost Per Parcel $268.11 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $722.48 30 $24.08
Contingency $849.97 30 $28.33
Total Incidental Costs $1,572.45 Cost Per Parcel $52.42 Total Projected Costs $9,615.86 Cost Per Parcel $320.53 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $7,732.68
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$257.75
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$7,732.68
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$257.75
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($1,883.18)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,294.45
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,294.45
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 6 (68-1538)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 7 (68-1539)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acres
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 4,426.73 2095.48 $2.11 Water 2,980.41 2095.48 $1.42
Backflow Certification 58.45 2095.48 $0.03
Tree Trimming 1,907.40 2095.48 $0.91
Monument Lighting 164.02 2095.48 $0.08
Electricity 1,005.71 2095.48 $0.48
Field Inspection/Management 936.20 2095.48 $0.45
Repair and Replacement 649.36 2095.48 $0.31
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $12,128.28 Cost Per Acres $5.79 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acres
Administrative Costs $1,030.90 2095.48 $0.49
Contingency $1,212.83 2095.48 $0.58
Total Incidental Costs $2,243.73 Cost Per Acres $1.07
Total Projected Costs $14,372.01 Cost Per Acres $6.86
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $11,799.35
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5.63
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$11,799.35
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $5.63
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($2,572.66)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,477.80
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,477.80
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcels
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 16,545.20 493 $33.56
Water 2,819.91 493 $5.72
Tree Trimming 1,144.44 493 $2.32
Electricity 1,896.40 493 $3.85
Repair and Replacement 851.60 493 $1.73
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $23,257.55 Cost Per Parcels $47.18 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcels
Administrative Costs $1,879.62 493 $3.81
Contingency $2,211.31 493 $4.49
Capital Improvements $2,467.08 493 $5.00
Total Incidental Costs $6,558.01 Cost Per Parcels $13.30 Total Projected Costs $29,815.56 Cost Per Parcels $60.48 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $24,317.69
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$49.33
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$24,317.69
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$49.33
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($5,497.87)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,689.32
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,689.32
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 9 (68-1540)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 38,207.22 1228.98 $31.09 Water 23,886.17 1228.98 $19.44
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 261.43 1228.98 $0.21 Backflow Certification 180.73 1228.98 $0.15
Tree Trimming 14,858.36 1228.98 $12.09
Trash Receptacles 963.93 1228.98 $0.78
Electricity 2,648.24 1228.98 $2.15
Field Inspection/Management 9,363.18 1228.98 $7.62
Repair and Replacement 4,879.88 1228.98 $3.97
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $95,249.14 Cost Per EDU $77.50 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $7,110.76 1228.98 $5.79
Contingency $8,365.60 1228.98 $6.81
Capital Improvements $4,535.08 1228.98 $3.69
Total Incidental Costs $20,011.44 Cost Per EDU $16.28
Total Projected Costs $115,260.58 Cost Per EDU $93.79
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $94,613.78
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$76.98
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$94,613.78
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $76.98
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($20,646.80)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 14 (68-1541)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected NO. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 113,186.57 5254.32 $21.54 Water 27,323.66 5254.32 $5.20
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 261.43 5254.32 $0.05 Backflow Certification 62.25 5254.32 $0.01
Tree Trimming 18,751.70 5254.32 $3.57
Trash Receptacles 1,307.25 5254.32 $0.25
Electricity
(Including: Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen
HPSV, Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen,
Monument Lighting) 86,081.40 5254.32 $16.38
Field Inspection/Management 30,680.15 5254.32 $5.84
Repair and Replacement 4,855.48 5254.32 $0.92
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $282,509.89 Cost Per EDU $53.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $23,641.42 5254.32 $4.50
Contingency $23,641.42 5254.32 $4.50
Capital Improvements $23,641.42 5254.32 $4.50
Total Incidental Costs $70,924.26 Cost Per EDU $13.50
Total Projected Costs $353,434.15 Cost Per EDU $67.27
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $409,833.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$78.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$353,434.15
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $67.27
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $277,199.16 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$277,199.16
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 16 (68-1542)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acres
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 6,146.54 24.42 $251.70 Water 2,309.00 24.42 $94.55
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 261.43 24.42 $10.71
Backflow Certification 942.89 24.42 $38.61
Electricity 172.32 24.42 $7.06
Field Inspection/Management 943.47 24.42 $38.64
Repair and Replacement 366.00 24.42 $14.99
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,141.65 Cost Per Acres $456.25 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acres
Administrative Costs $947.04 24.42 $38.78
Contingency $1,114.16 24.42 $45.62
Capital Improvements $2,599.12 24.42 $106.43
Total Incidental Costs $4,660.32 Cost Per Acres $190.84 Total Projected Costs $15,801.97 Cost Per Acres $647.09 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $17,649.17
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$722.74
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$15,801.97
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$647.09
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $44,595.89
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$44,595.89
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 17 (68-1543)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 20,493.45 166 $123.45 Water 5,360.36 166 $32.29
Backflow Certification 132.96 166 $0.80
Tree Trimming 207.01 166 $1.25
Electricity 353.24 166 $2.13
Field Inspection/Management 2,888.42 166 $17.40
Repair and Replacement 1,568.55 166 $9.45
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $31,003.99 Cost Per Parcel $186.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $2,635.34 166 $15.88
Contingency $3,100.40 166 $18.68
Capital Improvements $3,248.90 166 $19.57
Total Incidental Costs $8,984.64 Cost Per Parcel $54.12 Total Projected Costs $39,988.63 Cost Per Parcel $240.90 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $41,104.44
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$247.62
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$39,988.63
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$240.90
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $103,450.62 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$103,450.62
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 21 (68-1544)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 34 (68-1545)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 6,263.22 118 $53.08
Water 1,372.27 118 $11.63
Backflow Certification 52.29 118 $0.44
Tree Trimming 3,979.93 118 $33.73
Electricity 172.79 118 $1.46
Field Inspection/Management 920.22 118 $7.80
Repair and Replacement 57.51 118 $0.49
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $12,818.23 Cost Per Parcel $108.63 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $1,089.55 118 $9.23
Contingency $1,281.82 118 $10.86
Capital Improvements $3,248.90 118 $27.53
Total Incidental Costs $5,620.27 Cost Per Parcel $47.63 Total Projected Costs $18,438.50 Cost Per Parcel $156.26 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $13,692.39
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$116.04
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$13,692.39
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$116.04
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($4,746.11)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $23,448.57
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$23,448.57
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 192.10 31 $6.20
Field Inspection/Management 58.87 31 $1.90
Repair and Replacement 371.44 31 $11.98
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $622.41 Cost Per Parcel $20.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $52.90 31 $1.71
Contingency $62.24 31 $2.01
Capital Improvements $522.85 31 $16.87
Total Incidental Costs $637.99 Cost Per Parcel $20.58
Total Projected Costs $1,260.41 Cost Per Parcel $40.66
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $3,313.13
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$106.87
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,313.13
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$106.87
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $2,052.72
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $13,253.11
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $2,052.72
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$15,305.83
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 61 (68-1546)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 179.44 14 $12.82
Field Inspection/Management 358.88 14 $25.63
Repair and Replacement 58.87 14 $4.21
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $597.19 Cost Per Parcel $42.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $50.76 14 $3.63
Contingency $59.72 14 $4.27
Total Incidental Costs $110.48 Cost Per Parcel $7.89
Total Projected Costs $707.67 Cost Per Parcel $50.55
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $1,988.40
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$142.03
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$707.67
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$50.55
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,280.73
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $3,590.92
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,280.73
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$4,871.65
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 73 (68-1547)
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7386 -Pats Ranch/Limonite 2,769.68 41.35 $66.98 Traffic Signal #7399 -Pats Ranch/64th 11,078.70 41.35 $267.93 Traffic Signal #7400 -Pats Ranch/65th 11,078.70 41.35 $267.93 Fossil Filters 768.38 41.35 $18.58
Field Inspection/Management 1,486.15 41.35 $35.94
Repair and Replacement 247.31 41.35 $5.98
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $27,428.92 Cost Per Acre $663.34 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $2,331.46 41.35 $56.38
Contingency $2,742.89 41.35 $66.33
Capital Improvements $3,248.90 41.35 $78.57
Total Incidental Costs $8,323.25 Cost Per Acre $201.29
Total Projected Costs $35,752.17 Cost Per Acre $864.62
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $27,015.00
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $653.32
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $27,015.00
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $653.32
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($8,737.17)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $176,760.54 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $176,760.54
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 78 (68-1548)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7386 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500).
Traffic Signal s #7399 and #7400 were assessed at 100% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signals are 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 78 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 193.84 19 $10.20
Field Inspection/Management 15.72 19 $0.83
Repair and Replacement 19.64 19 $1.03
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $229.20 Cost Per Parcel $12.06 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $19.48 19 $1.03
Contingency $22.92 19 $1.21
Capital Improvements $941.13 19 $49.53
Total Incidental Costs $983.53 Cost Per Parcel $51.76
Total Projected Costs $1,212.73 Cost Per Parcel $63.83
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $2,479.03
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$130.47
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,479.03
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$130.47
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,266.30
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $5,462.20
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,266.30
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$6,728.50
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 95
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 95 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 725.61 26 $27.91
Field Inspection/Management 74.21 26 $2.85
Repair and Replacement 59.36 26 $2.28
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $859.18 Cost Per Parcel $33.05 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $73.03 26 $2.81
Contingency $85.91 26 $3.30
Total Incidental Costs $158.94 Cost Per Parcel $6.11
Total Projected Costs $1,018.12 Cost Per Parcel $39.16
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $6,783.02
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$260.89
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,783.02
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$260.89
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 102
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 102 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected NO. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7358 - Country Village/Vesada10,846.20 18.24 $594.64 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 330.51 18.24 $18.12
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,176.71 Cost Per Acre $612.76 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $58.66 18.24 $3.22
Contingency $69.02 18.24 $3.78
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $1,568.55 18.24 $86.00 Total Incidental Costs $1,696.23 Cost Per Acre $93.00
Total Projected Costs $12,872.94 Cost Per Acre $705.75
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $8,154.37
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$447.06
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,154.37
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$447.06
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($4,718.57)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $56,230.54
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$56,230.54
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 106 (68-1551)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7358 was assessed at 75% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 106 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Fossil Filters $89.72 130.53 $0.69
Field Inspection/Management $179.44 130.53 $1.37
Repair and Replacement $29.91 130.53 $0.23
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $299.07 Cost Per Acre $2.29 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $89.72 130.53 $0.69
Contingency $179.44 130.53 $1.37
Capital Improvements $29.91 130.53 $0.23
Total Incidental Costs $299.07 Cost Per Acre $2.29
Total Projected Costs $598.14 Cost Per Acre $4.58
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $1,635.24
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$12.53
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,635.24
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $12.53
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,037.10
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,871.97
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,037.10
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$11,909.07
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 126 (68-1552)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters $222.73 192.00 $1.16
Field Inspection/Management $22.57 192.00 $0.12
Repair and Replacement $18.06 192.00 $0.09
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $263.36 Cost Per Parcel $1.37 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $22.39 192.00 $0.12
Contingency $26.34 192.00 $0.14
Total Incidental Costs $48.73 Cost Per Parcel $0.25
Total Projected Costs $312.09 Cost Per Parcel $1.63
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $6,546.14
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34.09
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,546.14
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34.09
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $6,234.05
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.08
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $6,234.05
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$6,234.13
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 128
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 128 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7389 - Rubidoux/20th/Market$2,549.06 1.40 $1,820.76 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $811.91 1.40 $579.94
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $3,360.97 Cost Per Acre $2,400.69 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $271.16 1.40 $193.69
Contingency $319.01 1.40 $227.86
Total Incidental Costs $590.17 Cost Per Acre $421.55
Total Projected Costs $3,951.14 Cost Per Acre $2,822.24 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $3,142.57
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,244.69
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,142.57
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,244.69
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($808.57)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $23,928.69
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$23,928.69
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 132 (68-1554)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7389 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 132 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7338 - Bellegrave/Bain $3,894.74 32.61 $119.43 Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $2,058.59 32.61 $63.13 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $1,073.42 32.61 $32.92
Fossil Filters $1,152.02 32.61 $35.33
Field Inspection/Management $575.14 32.61 $17.64
Repair and Replacement $230.05 32.61 $7.05
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $8,983.96 Cost Per Acre $275.50 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $733.28 32.61 $22.49
Contingency $862.68 32.61 $26.45
Capital Improvements $1,568.55 32.61 $48.10
Total Incidental Costs $3,164.51 Cost Per Acre $97.04
Total Projected Costs $12,148.47 Cost Per Acre $372.54
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $12,140.59
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$372.30
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$12,140.59
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$372.30
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($7.88)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $52,660.86
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$52,660.86
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 137 (68-1555)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7338 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 137 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $3,450.81 9.95 $346.82 Water $1,725.41 9.95 $173.41
Backflow Certification $57.51 9.95 $5.78
Tree Trimming $805.19 9.95 $80.92
Bio-swales $172.54 9.95 $17.34
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $1,215.05 9.95 $122.12
Electricity $187.74 9.95 $18.87
Field Inspection/Management $19.48 9.95 $1.96
Repair and Replacement $115.03 9.95 $11.56
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $7,748.76 Cost Per Acre $778.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $652.58 9.95 $65.59
Contingency $767.74 9.95 $77.16
Total Incidental Costs $1,420.32 Cost Per Acre $142.75
Total Projected Costs $9,169.08 Cost Per Acre $921.52
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $17,253.26
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,734.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,169.08
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$921.52
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $31,766.57
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$31,766.57
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023.
ZONE 141
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 141 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $25,881.08 80 $323.51 Water $6,638.76 80 $82.98
Backflow Certification $230.05 80 $2.88
Tree Trimming $10,352.43 80 $129.41
Traffic Signal #1152 - Limonite/Wineville $1,019.62 80 $12.75 Fossil Filters $222.96 80 $2.79
Field Inspection/Management $1,030.16 80 $12.88
Repair and Replacement $575.14 80 $7.19
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $45,950.20 Cost Per EDU $574.38 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $3,901.36 80 $48.77
Contingency $4,589.84 80 $57.37
Total Incidental Costs $8,491.20 Cost Per EDU $106.14
Total Projected Costs $54,441.40 Cost Per EDU $680.52
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $26,473.47
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $330.92
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $26,473.47
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $330.92
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($27,967.93)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Traffic Signal #1152 was assessed at 10% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 142 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection Zone 142 also includes future parkway landscaping, bio-swales, fossil filters, traffic signal (#1505), and graffiti abatement (Phase 1& 2), which when completed may increase the per EDU assessment by $498.40, adjusted for inflation. At FY this amount would be $660.97, which when added to the current $290.38 would be a total of $951.35. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Zone 142 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
ZONE 142
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #4572 - CantuGalleano/I-15 $525.20 9.60 $54.71 Traffic Signal #7348 - CantuGalleano/Caden$1,067.87 9.60 $111.24 Traffic Signal #7350 - CantuGalleano/Wineville$1,067.87 9.60 $111.24 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $1,292.36 9.60 $134.62
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $3,953.30 Cost Per Acre $411.80 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $336.03 9.60 $35.00
Contingency $395.33 9.60 $41.18
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $510.00 9.60 $53.13
Total Incidental Costs $1,241.36 Cost Per Acre $129.31
Total Projected Costs $5,194.66 Cost Per Acre $541.11
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $4,244.28
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$442.11
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$4,244.28
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$442.11
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($950.38)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $54,548.77
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$54,548.77
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity.
ZONE 173 (68-1558)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Traffic Signal - Wineville/Mission $8,174.06 3 $2,724.69 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $4,882.62 3 $1,627.54
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $13,056.68 Cost Per Parcel $4,352.23 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $1,053.41 3 $351.14
Contingency $1,239.30 3 $413.10
Total Incidental Costs $2,292.71 Cost Per Parcel $764.24 Total Projected Costs $15,349.39 Cost Per Parcel $5,116.46 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $9,635.01
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,211.67
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,635.01
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,211.67
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($5,714.38)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $54,548.77
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$54,548.77
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE 182 (68-1559)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $2,726.14 1 $2,726.14 Mulch $522.64 1 $522.64
Water $1,564.37 1 $1,564.37
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $287.57 1 $287.57
Backflow Certification $104.57 1 $104.57
Tree Trimming $2,270.15 1 $2,270.15
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 1 $230.05
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $483.32 1 $483.32 Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $549.96 1 $549.96 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $8,738.77 Cost Per Parcel $8,738.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $87.83 1 $87.83
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $654.96 1 $654.96
Contingency - Landscaping $770.54 1 $770.54
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $103.33 1 $103.33
Total Incidental Costs $1,616.66 Cost Per Parcel $1,616.66 Total Projected Costs $10,355.43 Cost Per Parcel $10,355.43 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $9,992.15
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,992.15
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,992.15
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,992.15
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($363.28)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,720.25
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,720.25
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate.
Utility Provider: SCE
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE A (68-0023)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $2,865.75 4 $716.44
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $3,329.08 4 $832.27
Mulch $346.79 4 $86.70
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $297.92 4 $74.48
Backflow Certification $59.58 4 $14.90
Tree Trimming $238.34 4 $59.59
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $148.70 4 $37.18 Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $504.90 4 $126.23 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $7,791.06 Cost Per Parcel $1,947.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $53.63 4 $13.41
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $585.60 4 $146.40
Contingency - Landscaping $688.94 4 $172.24
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $63.09 4 $15.77
Total Incidental Costs $1,391.26 Cost Per Parcel $347.82 Total Projected Costs $9,182.32 Cost Per Parcel $2,295.58 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $9,193.03
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,298.26
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,182.32
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,295.58
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $10.71
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,131.61
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,131.61
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023.
Zone C is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
ZONE C (68-9959)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $6,132.36 1 $6,132.36
Mulch $575.14 1 $575.14
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $52.29 1 $52.29
Tree Trimming $309.09 1 $309.09
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $7,330.31 Cost Per Parcel $7,330.31 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $623.08 1 $623.08
Contingency $733.03 1 $733.03
Total Incidental Costs $1,356.11 Cost Per Parcel $1,356.11 Total Projected Costs $8,686.42 Cost Per Parcel $8,686.42 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $8,098.66
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,098.66
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,098.66
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,098.66
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($587.76)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $2,948.54
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$2,948.54
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE E (68-0174)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance4 $4,888.02 6 $814.67
Mulch $399.91 6 $66.65
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 6 $43.57
Backflow Certification $57.51 6 $9.59
Tree Trimming $532.62 6 $88.77
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $382.38 6 $63.73
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $6,521.87 Cost Per Parcel $1,086.98 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $31.39 6 $5.23
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $526.70 6 $87.78
Contingency - Landscaping $619.66 6 $103.28
Total Incidental Costs $1,177.75 Cost Per Parcel $196.29 Total Projected Costs $7,699.62 Cost Per Parcel $1,283.27 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $7,752.82
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,292.14
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$7,699.62
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,283.27
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,131.61
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,131.61
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE F (68-0175)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance4 $11,440.13 24 $476.67
Mulch $1,041.30 24 $43.39
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 24 $10.89
Backflow Certification $57.51 24 $2.40
Tree Trimming $1,757.73 24 $73.24
Monument Lighting $595.84 24 $24.83
Water Quality Basin $5,958.40 24 $248.27
Fertilizer Injector $262.17 24 $10.92
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $489.90 24 $20.41 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $21,864.41 Cost Per Parcel $911.02 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $41.66 24 $1.74
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $1,820.10 24 $75.84
Contingency - Landscaping $2,141.31 24 $89.22
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $49.02 24 $2.04
Ad Valorem Reduction -$7.65 24 -$0.32
Total Incidental Costs $4,044.44 Cost Per Parcel $168.52 Total Projected Costs $25,908.85 Cost Per Parcel $1,079.54 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $25,947.77
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,081.16
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$25,908.85
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,079.54
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. Zone G was NYM in prior year. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE G (68-9957)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance4 $4,071.96 2 $2,035.98
Mulch $147.68 2 $73.84
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 2 $130.72
Backflow Certification $52.29 2 $26.15
Tree Trimming $268.51 2 $134.26
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 2 $115.03
Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $433.40 2 $216.70 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $5,465.32 Cost Per Parcel $2,732.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $36.84 2 $18.42
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $427.71 2 $213.86
Contingency - Landscaping $530.14 2 $265.07
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $43.34 2 $21.67
Total Incidental Costs $1,038.03 Cost Per Parcel $519.02 Total Projected Costs $6,503.35 Cost Per Parcel $3,251.68 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $2,945.42
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,472.71
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,945.42
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,472.71
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($3,557.93)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE I (68-9960)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $5,511.16 25 $220.45
Mulch $574.08 25 $22.96
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 25 $10.46
Backflow Certification $57.51 25 $2.30
Tree Trimming $1,141.99 25 $45.68
Water Quality Basin $6,172.90 25 $246.92
Fertilizer Injector $271.61 25 $10.86
Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $1,484.18 25 $59.37 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $15,474.86 Cost Per Parcel $618.99 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $126.16 25 $5.05
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $1,191.43 25 $47.66
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $140.18 25 $5.61
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $148.42 25 $5.94
Ad Valorem RPARCELction -$13.79 25 -$0.55
Total Incidental Costs $1,592.40 Cost Per Parcel $63.70 Total Projected Costs $17,067.26 Cost Per Parcel $682.69 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $18,065.72
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$722.63
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$17,067.26
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$682.69
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $685.60
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$685.60
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE K (68-9961)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $6,077.57 4 $1,519.39
Water $1,859.02 4 $464.76
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 4 $65.36
Backflow Certification $115.03 4 $28.76
Tree Trimming $1,072.51 4 $268.13
Fertilizer Injector $524.33 4 $131.08
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $256.50 4 $64.13 Electricity $357.50 4 $89.38
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $10,523.89 Cost Per Parcel $2,630.97 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $21.80 4 $5.45
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $874.96 4 $218.74
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,029.36 4 $257.34
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $25.65 4 $6.41
Total Incidental Costs $1,951.77 Cost Per Parcel $487.94 Total Projected Costs $12,475.66 Cost Per Parcel $3,118.93 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $12,402.50
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,100.63
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$12,402.50
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,100.63
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($73.16)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $5,841.57
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$5,841.57
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE L (68-9962)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $7,150.08 1 $7,150.08
Mulch $744.80 1 $744.80
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $57.51 1 $57.51
Tree Trimming $268.13 1 $268.13
Streetlights LS-1 150 W 9500 Lumen LED $558.20 1 $558.20 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $9,040.15 Cost Per Parcel $9,040.15 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $47.45 1 $47.45
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $723.19 1 $723.19
Contingency $850.81 1 $850.81
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $55.82 1 $55.82
Total Incidental Costs $1,677.27 Cost Per Parcel $1,677.27 Total Projected Costs $10,717.42 Cost Per Parcel $10,717.42 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $10,724.65
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$10,724.65
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$10,717.42
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$10,717.42
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $6,724.23
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$6,724.23
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE M (68-0234)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $2,937.25 2 $1,468.63
Mulch $208.40 2 $104.20
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 2 $130.72
Backflow Certification $57.51 2 $28.76
Tree Trimming $536.26 2 $268.13
Streetlights LS-1 22 W 9500 Lumen LED $254.99 2 $127.50 Streetlights LS-1 84 W 9500 Lumen LED $130.42 2 $65.21
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $4,386.26 Cost Per Parcel $2,193.13 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $32.75 2 $16.38
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $342.30 2 $171.15
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $402.70 2 $201.35
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $38.54 2 $19.27
Total Incidental Costs $816.29 Cost Per Parcel $408.15
Total Projected Costs $5,202.55 Cost Per Parcel $2,601.28 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $5,219.56
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,609.78
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,202.55
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,601.28
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $7,565.85
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$7,565.85
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE N (68-0235)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $1,716.01 10 $171.60
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 10 $26.14
Backflow Certification $57.51 10 $5.75
Tree Trimming $268.13 10 $26.81
Streetlights LS-1 39 W 9500 Lumen LED $423.28 10 $42.33 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $2,726.36 Cost Per Parcel $272.64 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $35.98 10 $3.60
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $197.98 10 $19.80
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $232.92 10 $23.29
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $42.33 10 $4.23
Total Incidental Costs $509.21 Cost Per Parcel $50.92
Total Projected Costs $3,235.57 Cost Per Parcel $323.56 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $3,250.96
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$325.10
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,235.57
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$323.56
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $4,220.08
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$4,220.08
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE O (68-0236)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $14,007.53 4 $3,501.88
Mulch $1,459.12 4 $364.78
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 4 $65.36
Backflow Certification $52.29 4 $13.07
Tree Trimming $1,202.56 4 $300.64
Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED $830.27 4 $207.57
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $17,813.20 Cost Per Parcel $4,453.30 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $70.57 4 $17.64
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $1,443.65 4 $360.91
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,698.29 4 $424.57
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $83.02 4 $20.76
Total Incidental Costs $3,295.53 Cost Per Parcel $823.88 Total Projected Costs $21,108.73 Cost Per Parcel $5,277.18 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $21,060.40
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,265.10
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$21,060.40
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,265.10
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($48.33)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. Zone P was NYM in previous year. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE P (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $3,180.50 3 $1,060.17
Mulch $331.28 3 $110.43
Water Meter $67.87 3 $22.62
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 3 $87.14
Backflow Certification $57.51 3 $19.17
Tree Trimming $258.81 3 $86.27
Streetlights LS-1 82 W 9500 Lumen LED $305.39 3 $101.80 Electricity $363.56 3 $121.19
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $4,826.35 Cost Per Parcel $1,608.78 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $26.66 3 $8.89
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $385.34 3 $128.45
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $453.21 3 $151.07
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $30.30 3 $10.10
Total Incidental Costs $895.51 Cost Per Parcel $298.50
Total Projected Costs1 $5,721.86 Cost Per Parcel $1,907.29 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $5,751.35
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,917.12
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,721.86
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,907.29
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $651.17
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$651.17
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE S (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $5,031.41 5 $1,006.28
Mulch $524.10 5 $104.82
Water $3,249.78 5 $649.96
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 5 $52.29
Backflow Certification $52.29 5 $10.46
Tree Trimming $836.56 5 $167.31
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 5 $46.01
Streetlights LS-1 70 W LED $465.16 5 $93.03
Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED $321.42 5 $64.28
Electricity $330.51 5 $66.10
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,302.71 Cost Per Parcel $2,260.54 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $66.86 5 $13.37
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $892.44 5 $178.49
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,049.94 5 $209.99
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $78.66 5 $15.73
Total Incidental Costs $2,087.90 Cost Per Parcel $417.58 Total Projected Costs $13,390.61 Cost Per Parcel $2,678.12 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $13,326.40
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,665.49
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$13,326.40
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,665.49
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($64.21)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $5,189.22
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$5,189.22
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE T (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $2,385.24 1 $2,385.24
Mulch $248.46 1 $248.46
Water $1,253.77 1 $1,253.77
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $52.29 1 $52.29
Tree Trimming $522.85 1 $522.85
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 1 $230.05
Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED $160.72 1 $160.72
Streetlights LS-1 22 W LED $129.82 1 $129.82
Electricity $330.51 1 $330.51
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $5,575.14 Cost Per Parcel $5,575.14 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $24.63 1 $24.63
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $447.76 1 $447.76
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $526.77 1 $526.77
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $28.97 1 $28.97
Total Incidental Costs $1,028.13 Cost Per Parcel $1,028.13 Total Projected Costs $6,603.27 Cost Per Parcel $6,603.27 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $6,568.04
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,568.04
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,568.04
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,568.04
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($35.23)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,671.42
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,671.42
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE U (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Annual Parkway Landscaping Maintenance3 $1,200.00 28 $42.86 Water $3,702.00 28 $132.21
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 28 $8.93
Backflow Certification $50.00 28 $1.79
Tree Trimming $5,200.00 28 $185.71
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 28 $7.86
Streetlights LS-1 22 W LED $1,288.55 28 $46.02
Electricity $300.00 28 $10.71
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $12,210.55 Cost Per Parcel $436.09 Incidental Cost Projected No. of Cost Per
Function Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $928.37 28 $33.16
Administrative Costs - Streelighting $109.53 28 $3.91
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,092.20 28 $39.01
Operating Reserve - Streetlighting $128.86 28 $4.60
Rounding $30.49 28 $1.09
Total Incidental Costs $2,289.45 Cost Per Parcel $81.77 Total Projected Costs $14,500.00 Cost Per Parcel $517.86 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$14,500.00
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$517.86
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$14,500.00
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$517.86
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $ - ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY 2023-24 is the first year assessment.
3 Lump sum reflecting incidental cost for tree maintenance. Groundcover maintenance not included. Parkway groundcover area to be maintained by private entity (Home owners and/or HOA – as approved by the City).
ZONE W (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $13,634.59 1 $13,634.59
Mulch $1,526.20 1 $1,526.20
Water $8,285.46 1 $8,285.46
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $104.57 1 $104.57
Tree Trimming $4,601.08 1 $4,601.08
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 1 $230.05
Electricity $330.51 1 $330.51
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $28,973.89 Cost Per Parcel $28,973.89 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $2,461.35 1 $2,461.35 Operating Reserve - Landscaping $2,895.71 1 $2,895.71
Total Incidental Costs $5,357.06 Cost Per Parcel $5,357.06 Total Projected Costs $34,330.95 Cost Per Parcel $34,330.95 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $34,314.65
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34,314.65
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34,314.65
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34,314.65
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($16.30)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,247.48
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,247.48
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE X (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Parkway Landscaping Maintenance3 $6,274.20 3 $2,091.40 Water (including water meter) $3,869.09 3 $1,289.70
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 3 $87.14
Backflow Certification $52.29 3 $17.43
Tree Trimming $3,764.52 3 $1,254.84
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 3 $76.68
Mulch $679.71 3 $226.57
Grafitti $5.23 3 $1.74
Streetlights LED (Market Street) $363.56 3 $121.19
Streetlights LED (Hall Ave; 24th St.) $121.19 3 $40.40
Electricity $330.51 3 $110.17
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $15,951.77 Cost Per Parcel$5,317.26 Incidental Cost Projected No. of Cost Per
Function Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administratition $1,272.83 3 $424.28
Inspection $795.52 3 $265.17
Operating Reserve $1,591.03 3 $530.34
Total Incidental Costs $3,659.37 Cost Per Parcel$1,219.79 Total Projected Costs $19,611.14 Cost Per Parcel $6,537.05 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $19,611.14
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,537.05
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$19,611.14
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,537.05
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $ - ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE Y (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $44,216.61 202.02 $218.87 Mulch $1,526.20 202.02 $7.55
Water $10,252.04 202.02 $50.75
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $522.85 202.02 $2.59 Backflow Certification $104.57 202.02 $0.52
Tree Trimming $20,914.00 202.02 $103.52
Graffitti Abatement $3.40 202.02 $0.02
Fertilizer Injector $3,555.38 202.02 $17.60
Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Cactus Ave $5,508.50 202.02 $27.27 Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Sandstone Rd $11,017.00 202.02 $54.53 Traffic Signal El Rivino Rd & Cedar/Rubidoux Blvd $4,406.80 202.02 $21.81 Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Hall Ave $4,406.80 202.02 $21.81 Traffic Signal - Agua Mansa Rd/ Market St $2,203.40 202.02 $10.91 Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Market St/20th St $3,305.10 202.02 $16.36 Streetlights LS-1 LED (El Rivino Rd, Hall Ave, Brown Ave)$674.33 202.02 $3.34 Streetlights LS-1 LED (Rubidoux Blvd) $2,160.00 202.02 $10.69 Electricity $661.02 202.02 $3.27
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $115,438.00 Cost Per Acre $571.42 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs (8%) $9,081.34 202.02 $44.95
Inspections (5%) $5,675.84 202.02 $28.10
Operating Reserve, Repairs, and Replacements (10%)$11,351.67 202.02 $56.19 Total Incidental Costs $26,108.85 Cost Per Acre $129.24 Total Projected Costs $141,546.85 Cost Per Acre $700.66 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $139,626.05
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$691.14
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$139,626.05
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$691.14
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($1,920.80)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $16,541.78
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$16,541.78
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE Z (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Acres Acre
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $13,494.00 23.44 $575.68 Mulch $1,406.00 23.44 $59.98
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 23.44 $10.67 Backflow Certification $50.00 23.44 $2.13
Tree Trimming $3,000.00 23.44 $127.99
Water (inlcuding water meter) $7,449.00 23.44 $317.79
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 23.44 $9.39
Electricity (including electric meter) $300.00 23.44 $12.80 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $26,169.00 Cost Per Acre $1,116.42 City Project: Capital Improvements $365,000.00 23.44 $15,571.67 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs (8%) $2,225.00 23.44 $94.92
Operating Reserve (10%) $2,616.00 23.44 $111.60
Total Incidental Costs $4,841.00 Cost Per Acre $206.52
Total Projected Costs $396,010.00 Cost Per Acre $16,894.62 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $396,010.00
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $16,894.62
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $396,010.00
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $16,894.62
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
Zone DD is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
ZONE DD (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $935.00 3.00 $311.67
Mulch $137.00 3.00 $45.67
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 3.00 $83.33
Backflow Certification $50.00 3.00 $16.67
Tree Trimming $1,000.00 3.00 $333.33
Water (inlcuding water meter) $1,170.00 3.00 $390.00
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 3.00 $73.33
Grafitti Abatement $5.00 3.00 $1.67
Electricity (including electric meter) $300.00 3.00 $100.00 Rounding $76.00 3.00 $25.33
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $4,143.00 Cost Per Parcel $1,381.00 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs (8%) $346.00 3.00 $115.33
Inspection (5%) $204.00 3.00 $68.00
Operating Reserve (10%) $407.00 3.00 $135.67
Total Incidental Costs $957.00 Cost Per Parcel $319.00
Total Projected Costs $5,100.00 Cost Per Parcel $1,700.00 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $5,100.00
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $1,700.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $5,100.00
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $1,700.00
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
ZONE EE (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $5,040.00 25.00 $201.60
Mulch $525.00 25.00 $21.00
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 25.00 $10.00 Backflow Certification $50.00 25.00 $2.00
Tree Trimming $2,100.00 25.00 $84.00
Water (including water meter) $3,222.00 25.00 $128.88
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 25.00 $8.80
Electricity (including electric meter) $300.00 25.00 $12.00 Rounding $27.20 25.00 $1.09
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,734.20 Cost Per Parcel $469.37 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $995.10 25.00 $39.80
Operating Reserve (10%) $1,170.70 25.00 $46.83
Total Incidental Costs $2,165.80 Cost Per Parcel $86.63 Total Projected Costs $13,900.00 Cost Per Parcel $556.00 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $13,900.00
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $556.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $13,900.00
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $556.00
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
ZONE FF (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Acres Acre
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $7,351.79 31.67 $232.14
Mulch $739.20 31.67 $23.34
Water (including water meter) $7,202.00 31.67 $227.41
Electricity (including electric meter) $500.00 31.67 $15.79 CalSense Single $250.00 31.67 $7.89
Backflow Certification $50.00 31.67 $1.58
Tree Trimming $3,520.00 31.67 $111.15
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 31.67 $6.95
Repairs & Replacements (15%) $2,974.95 31.67 $93.94
Rounding $0.48 31.67 $0.72
Total Annual Landscaping Costs $22,808.42 Cost Per Acre $720.89 Streetlights LED (Mission Blvd) $1,308.94 31.67 $41.33
Streetlights LED (Pyrite Street) $681.92 31.67 $21.53
Total Annual Streetlighting Costs $1,990.86 Cost Per Acre $62.86 Traffic Signal at Mission Blvd. and Shops Entrance$10,000.00 31.67 $315.76 Traffic Signal at Pyrite St. and Shops Entrance $10,000.00 31.67 $315.76 Traffic Signal at Pyrite St. and SR-60 EB Ramps $4,500.00 31.67 $142.09 Traffic Signal at Pyrite St. and SR-60 WB Ramps $4,500.00 31.67 $142.09 Traffic Signal at Mission Blvd. and Pyrite St. $1,000.00 31.67 $31.58 Total Traffic Signal Costs $30,000.00 Cost Per Acre $947.27 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs (8%) $4,383.90 31.67 $138.42
Inspections (5%) $2,739.94 31.67 $86.52
Contingency (10%) $5,479.88 31.67 $173.03
Total Incidental Costs $12,603.72 Cost Per Acre $397.97 Total Projected Costs $67,403.00 Cost Per Acre $2,129.00 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $67,403.00
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,129.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$67,403.00
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,129.00
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
ZONE II (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
17 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Part IV – Assessment Diagrams
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.
If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parce ls shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.
Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.
12 | P a g e
ETIWANDA AVE
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAPCITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED ZONE O TR 32723 CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA E ½ W ½ NW ¼ SEC 18 T.2S. R.5W. VICINITY MAP For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the the County Subzone Boundary 183-310-034, 183-310-035, 183-310-036, 183-310-037, 183-310-038, 183-310-039, 183-310-040, 183-310-041, 183-310-042, 183-310-043 Project Site 183-310-034 183-310-036 183-310-038 183-310-037 183-310-041 183-310-042 183-310-035 183-310-040 183-310-039 183-310-043 14 | P a g e
68THSTREET
IVORY STREET
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ZONE T
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC.10 T.2S R.5W
26TH ST
RUBIDOUX BLVD
AVALON ST
LOCATION MAPVICINITY MAP
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
178-140-010
178-140-018
¯
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap,
INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri
SITE
¯
FOR DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND
DIMENSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBERS, REFER TO THE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP AS OF THE DATE OF THE REPORT.
Subzone Boundary
178-140-010
178-140-018
13 | P a g e
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE EE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PARCELS 6 THROUGH 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 31081, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STSATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 220, PAGES 49 THROUGH 51, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PM 37614
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.
Subzone Boundary
VICINITY MAP
167-110-035
167-110-036
167-110-037
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE FF
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP 21212, IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 153, PAGES 34 & 35, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PM 37614
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.
Subzone Boundary
VICINITY MAP
171-101-072
171-101-073
14 | P a g e
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
B - 1
PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS
Part V – Assessment Rolls
The District’s FY 2023-24 Assessment Rolls are voluminous and are filed in the office of the City Clerk and are by reference herein made a part of this Report.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
www.WeAreHarris.com
Chris Thomas
Project Manager
[email protected]
P: 619-481-5032
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEER’S REPORT VOLUME 2
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
STREETLIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F AND 2-G June 2023
PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
600 B
Street, Suite 2000
San Diego, CA 92101
619
-
236
-
1778
www.weareharris.com
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of Assessment Engineer ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Part I – Plans and Specifications ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Part II – Method of Apportionment ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses ............................................................................................................................. 13 Part IV – Assessment Diagrams ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Part V – Assessment Rolls ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
PROJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) – CITYWIDE.
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023–2024
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) has been prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum assessments that can be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel of land within each Zone of the District.
The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:
Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and article of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.
I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein.
2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.
3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor.
Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1- Consolidated have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the items being financed.
DATED this 7th day of June, 2023.
Alison M. Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Riverside
State of California
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Background
This combined Annual Engineer’s Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all annual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.
The 1972 Act provides for the annual levy of assessments for the Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C, for the express purpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing of the following:
• Landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation; Statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures;
• Public lighting facilities, including traffic signals; • Appurtenant facilities necessary for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including walls, sidewalks, and removal of debris; and
• Maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing, including the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments for an assessment district after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provision s in Proposition 218.
The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.
The Report prepared by the engineer must include maintenance plans for the improvements. The Report must also include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots whic h benefit from the improvements. Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved.
Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its rev iew and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.
In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners of the assessed parcels must approve any new or increased assessments. Zones included in this Report have been previously approved by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.
Part I – Plans and Specifications
INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Assessment Zone means the zones which include landscaping, water quality, streetlighting and other co mbinations of improvements. Street lighting Zone means a zone that only includes streetlighting improvements which includes streetlights and traffic signals.
There are 77 locations within the District: 47 separate assessment zones with 56 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 21 street lighting assessment zones with 21 locations.
There are 59 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (17) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consists of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F , Z, DD and Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on seven (7) locations within the District on Fiscal Year 2023-2024; these locations are in Assessment District Zone G, P, W, Y, EE, FF, II and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 68 existing Zones (77 locations). New or pending Zones will be presented to the City Council under separate reports.
Total number of Zones/Locations: 68 (77 locations)
Assessment Zones: 47 (56 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 21 (21 locations)
Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 55 within 47 Assessment Zones Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Locations (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 21 – within 15 Assessment Zones.
The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:
Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G.
B. ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, Z, DD, II; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.
Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, EE, FF; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F
EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.
Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Locations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zone 137, Zone 17 3, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone F, Zone G, Zone I, Zone K, Zone L, Zone M, Zone N, Zone O, Zone P, Zone R, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone W, Zone X, Zone Y and Zone Z; and Street Lighting Zone 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 15, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, Street Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, Street Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2 -A, Street Lighting Zone 2 -B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, Street Lighting Zone 2-E, Street Lighting Zone 2-F and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements not yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, and Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
C. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities (also referred herein to as “streetlighting" or “traffic signals” ), and appurtenant facilities, including walls (also referred herein to as “fencing”), sidewalks (also referred herein to as “multi purpose trail”), and debris removal facilities (also referred herein to as “bio-swales” or “fossil filters”) are located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, spraying, fertilizing, or treatment for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel , power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities (also referred herein to as “street lighting"), and appurtenant facilities, including walls (also referred herein to as “fencing”), sidewalks, and debris removal facilities are located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, spraying, fertilizing, or treatment for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improveme nts to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.
Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.
Description of Improvements per Zone
Street Lighting Zone 5:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 5 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Galena Street
Street Lighting Zone 7:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 7 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Jurupa Road
Street Lighting Zone 15:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 15 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Etiwanda Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 17:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 17 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
La Rue Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 19:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 19 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 39:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 39 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Limonite Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 41:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 41 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Riverview Drive
Street Lighting Zone 62:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 62 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20th Street
Street Lighting Zone 69:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 69 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Carrerra Court Mustang Lane
Street Lighting Zone 86:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 86 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue Rutile Street
Street Lighting Zone 91:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 91 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Amarillo Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 93:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 93 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
37th Street Wallace Street
Street Lighting Zone 94:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 94 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20th Street Van Dell Road
Street Lighting Zone 102:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 102 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Fleming Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-A:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-A generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bain Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-B:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-B generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Mission Boulevard Pyrite Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-C:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-C generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Lamelas Cir Sunnyhill Drive
Street Lighting Zone 2-D:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-D generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Iberia Street Etiwanda Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 2-E:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-E generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20th Street Caterpillar Court
Street Lighting Zone 2-F:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-F generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 2-G:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-G generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue Agua Mansa Avenue
Maintenance Plans
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are voluminous and are not bound in this Report but by this reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection. Copies are available in the office of the Riverside County Transportation Department, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. See the list below for plan numbers. Reduced maps of the maintained improvements are filled in Part IV of this Report; see Assessment Diagrams.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:
ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone 2-A IP17-007
Zone 2-B IP16-010
Zone 2-C IP16-009
Zone 2-D IP18-007
Zone 2-E GP19-007
Zone 2-F IP18-001
Zone 2-G
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Part II – Method of Apportionment
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value.
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.
In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Constitution (“Article”) requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of street lighting provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).
Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.
In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of street lighting specially benefit parcels within the District by increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. Street lighting also provides safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign right -of ways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. The y also provid e an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District. Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow th e street to perform to the standards it was designed.
Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conduci ve to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to re act safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility.
The system of streets within the District is established to provide access to each parcel in the District. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District.
Finally, the servicing of streetlights provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the District.
Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights are apportioned on a per acre or per parcel basis.
Based on the benefits described above, streetlights are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government -owned easements, utility easements, or flood channel parcels. Government-owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public.
As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not rece ive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.
Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including traffic signals, • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which ar e necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and;
• The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.
GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total streetlight servicing costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
other City Fu nds. Because the streetlights are located immediately adjacent to properties within the District and are maintained solely for the benefit of the properties within the District, any benefit received by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit. As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
13 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES
Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses
INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.
The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire fiscal year (2023-2024), including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.
The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.
The inflation factor, for those zones with an inflation factor in place, may increase budgets for Zones, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed. However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.
Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G, may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area or, as implemented on December 2017, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The annual CPI-U for All Items or CPI-U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI-U for All Items, or CPI-U for Electricity annual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property owners within each of the benefit zones in the District.
There is a two percent proposed inflationary increase in the maximum assessment per parcel or per acre as applicable in Street Lighting Zones 7, 41, 62, 69, 86, 93, and 102 over the maximum assessment for fiscal year 2022-2023 (if applicable), and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.
BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained during fiscal year 2023-2024 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditures, CPI-U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:
1. 1. LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone dated 05/19/2023; CFDLLMD 22 -23 YEAR END
ESTIMATES
The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 were prepared for this report – see following page JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $607.29 1 $607.29
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $607.29 Cost Per Parcel $607.29 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $51.61 1 $51.61
Contingency $60.73 1 $60.73
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $30.36 1 $30.36
Total Incidental Costs $142.70 Cost Per Parcel $142.70
Total Projected Costs $749.99 Cost Per Parcel $749.99
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $746.72
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$746.72
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$746.72
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$746.72
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($3.27)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $188.38
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$188.38
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 5 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcel Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $303.66 1 $303.66
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $303.66 Cost Per Parcel $303.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcel Acre
Administrative Costs $25.81 1 $25.81
Contingency $30.36 1 $30.36
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $15.18 1 $15.18
Total Incidental Costs $71.35 Cost Per Parcel $71.35
Total Projected Costs $375.01 Cost Per Parcel $375.01
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $376.55
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$376.55
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $442.16
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$442.16
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 7 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $607.29 1 $607.29
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $607.29 Cost Per Parcel $607.29 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $51.61 1 $51.61
Contingency $60.73 1 $60.73
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $27.54 1 $27.54
Total Incidental Costs $139.88 Cost Per Parcel $139.88
Total Projected Costs $747.17 Cost Per Parcel $747.17
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $748.65
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$748.65
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$747.17
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$747.17
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $188.38
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$188.38
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 15 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $1,270.08 9.85 $128.94 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $278.81 9.85 $28.31
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,548.89 Cost Per Acre $157.25 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $131.65 9.85 $13.37
Contingency $27.88 9.85 $2.83
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $77.45 9.85 $7.86
Total Incidental Costs $236.98 Cost Per Acre $24.06
Total Projected Costs $1,785.87 Cost Per Acre $181.31
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,908.10
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$193.72
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,785.87
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$181.31
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $2,273.96
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$2,273.96
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 17 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 19 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $303.66 1 $303.66
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $303.66 Cost Per Parcel $303.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $25.81 1 $25.81
Contingency $30.36 1 $30.36
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $15.18 1 $15.18
Total Incidental Costs $71.35 Cost Per Parcel $71.35
Total Projected Costs $375.01 Cost Per Parcel $375.01
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $412.28
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$412.28
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $94.74
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$94.74
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 39 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $804.89 4.72 $170.53 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $804.89 Cost Per Acre $170.53 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $68.42 4.72 $14.50
Contingency $80.49 4.72 $17.05
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $33.05 4.72 $7.00
Total Incidental Costs $181.96 Cost Per Acre $38.55
Total Projected Costs $986.85 Cost Per Acre $209.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $381.49
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$80.82
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$381.49
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $80.82
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($605.36)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $328.05
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$328.05
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 41 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $207.10 0.37 $559.73
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $207.10 Cost Per Acre $559.73 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $17.61 0.37 $47.59
Contingency $20.71 0.37 $55.97
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $11.02 0.37 $29.78
Total Incidental Costs $49.34 Cost Per Acre $133.35
Total Projected Costs $256.44 Cost Per Acre $693.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $422.49
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,141.86
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$422.49
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,141.86
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$166.05
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $784.06
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $166.05
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$950.11
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 62 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $607.29 3.84 $158.15 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $607.29 Cost Per Acre $158.15 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $51.61 3.84 $13.44
Contingency $60.73 3.84 $15.82
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $27.54 3.84 $7.17
Total Incidental Costs $139.88 Cost Per Acre $36.43
Total Projected Costs $747.17 Cost Per Acre $194.58
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $960.40
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$250.10
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$960.40
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$250.10
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$213.23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $748.95
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $250.10
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$999.05
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 69 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $495.77 6.45 $76.86
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $495.77 Cost Per Acre $76.86 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $42.14 6.45 $6.53
Contingency $49.58 6.45 $7.69
Total Incidental Costs $91.72 Cost Per Acre $14.22
Total Projected Costs $587.49 Cost Per Acre $91.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $2,589.11
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$401.41
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,589.11
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$401.41
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$2,001.62
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $8,757.80
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $2,001.62
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,759.42
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 86 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 765.77 20.18 $37.95
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 765.77 20.18 $37.95
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,531.54 Cost Per Acre $75.89 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $147.94 20.18 $7.33
Contingency $174.04 20.18 $8.62
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $87.02 20.18 $4.31
Total Incidental Costs $409.00 Cost Per Acre $20.27
Total Projected Costs $1,940.54 Cost Per Acre $96.16
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $3,770.95
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$186.87
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,770.95
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$186.87
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$1,830.41
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $6,165.65
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,830.41
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$7,996.06
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 91 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 791.81 3.87 $204.60
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 2507.45 3.87 $647.92 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $3,299.26 Cost Per Acre $852.52 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $280.44 3.87 $72.47
Contingency $329.93 3.87 $85.25
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $110.17 3.87 $28.47
Total Incidental Costs $720.54 Cost Per Acre $186.19
Total Projected Costs $4,019.80 Cost Per Acre $1,038.71 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $3,881.90
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,003.07
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,881.90
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,003.07
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($137.90)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,129.65
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,129.65
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 93 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 415.54 0.5 $831.08
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $415.54 Cost Per Acre $831.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $35.32 0.5 $70.64
Contingency $41.56 0.5 $83.12
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $20.78 0.5 $41.56
Total Incidental Costs $97.66 Cost Per Acre $195.32
Total Projected Costs $513.20 Cost Per Acre $1,026.40
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $957.12
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,914.24
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$957.12
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,914.24
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$443.92
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,224.59
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $443.92
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,668.51
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 94 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 1,419.43 3.66 $387.82 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,419.43 Cost Per Acre $387.82 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $120.65 3.66 $32.96
Contingency $141.94 3.66 $38.78
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $66.10 3.66 $18.06
Total Incidental Costs $328.69 Cost Per Acre $89.81
Total Projected Costs $1,748.12 Cost Per Acre $477.63
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,282.10
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$350.30
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,282.10
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$350.30
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($466.02)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $411.68
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$411.68
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 102 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 281.28 2.38 $118.18
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $281.28 Cost Per Acre $118.18 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $23.91 2.38 $10.05
Contingency $28.13 2.38 $11.82
Total Incidental Costs $52.04 Cost Per Acre $21.87
Total Projected Costs $333.32 Cost Per Acre $140.05
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $469.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$197.09
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$333.32
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$140.05
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,136.04
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,136.04
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-A (68-9963)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent660.95 3 $220.32 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $660.95 Cost Per Parcel $220.32 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $56.18 3 $18.73
Contingency $66.09 3 $22.03
Total Incidental Costs $122.27 Cost Per Parcel $40.76
Total Projected Costs $783.22 Cost Per Parcel $261.07
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $787.73
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$262.58
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$787.73
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$262.58
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $4.51
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-B (68-9956)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 100 Watt 9,500 Lumen LED Equivalent124.35 3 $41.45 Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent136.89 3 $45.63 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $261.24 Cost Per Parcel $87.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $22.20 3 $7.40
Operating Reserve $26.12 3 $8.71
Total Incidental Costs $48.32 Cost Per Parcel $16.11
Total Projected Costs $309.56 Cost Per Parcel $103.19
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $311.31
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$103.77
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$309.56
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$103.19
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-C (68-9964)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 50 Watt LED 369.87 16 $23.12
Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 134.70 16 $8.42
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $504.57 Cost Per Parcel $31.54 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $42.89 16 $2.68
Operating Reserve $50.46 16 $3.15
Total Incidental Costs $93.35 Cost Per Parcel $5.83
Total Projected Costs $597.92 Cost Per Parcel $37.37
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $601.29
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$37.58
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$597.92
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $37.37
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-D (68-0238)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 850.13 2 $425.07
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $850.13 Cost Per Parcel $425.07 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $72.26 2 $36.13
Operating Reserve $85.02 2 $42.51
Total Incidental Costs $157.28 Cost Per Parcel $78.64
Total Projected Costs $1,007.41 Cost Per Parcel $503.71 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,013.07
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$506.54
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,007.41
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$503.71
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-E (68-0239)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 85 Watt LED 1,323.80 8 $165.48
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs$1,323.80 Cost Per Parcel $165.48 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $112.53 8 $14.07
Operating Reserve $132.38 8 $16.55
Total Incidental Costs $244.91 Cost Per Parcel $30.61
Total Projected Costs $1,568.71 Cost Per Parcel $196.09 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,577.52
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$197.19
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,568.71
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$196.09
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 2-E is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-F (68-0240)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 85 Watt LED $134.28 6 $22.38
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $134.28 Cost Per Parcel $22.38 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $11.41 6 $1.90
Operating Reserve $13.43 6 $2.24
Total Incidental Costs $24.84 Cost Per Parcel $4.14
Total Projected Costs $159.12 Cost Per Parcel $26.52
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $160.01
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$26.67
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$159.12
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $26.52
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Acres Acre
Streetlights (5) LED (Hall Ave) 544.61 23.44 $23.23
Streetlights (2) LED (Agua Mansa) 244.83 23.44 $10.45
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $789.44 Cost Per Acre $33.68 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $67.10 23.44 $2.86
Operating Reserve $78.95 23.44 $3.37
Total Incidental Costs $146.05 Cost Per Acre $6.23
Total Projected Costs $935.49 Cost Per Acre $39.92
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $469.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$20.01
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$469.08
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $20.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($466.41)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-G (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
16 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Part IV – Assessment Diagrams
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.
If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.
Information identified on these maps was received fro m several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.
APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Page B-1
Page B-2
Page B-3
Page B-4
Page B-5
Page B-6
Page B-7
Page B-8
Page B-9
Page B-10
Page B-11
Page B-12
Page B-13
Page B-14
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-A
Serrano Business Center (PM 36828)
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 9, T.2S., R.6W., S.B.M. Schedule “E”
VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
156-210-093
156-210-093
Project Site
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-B
TR 36977
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA T2SR6W SEC 12 PSEC
VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
171-260-013
171-260-013
Project Site
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2 - C
TR 32722
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 7, T.2S, R. 5W
VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
174-170-039
174-170-03040
174-170-03041
Project Site
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-E
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 3, T. 2 S, R. 5 W, S.B.M.
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
175-160-027 175-160-044
Project Site
175-160-028 175-160-045
175-160-038 175-160-046
175-160-042 175-160-047
175-160-027
175-160-028
175-160-045
175-160-038
175-160-042
175-160-044
175-160-047
175-160-046
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s Parcel
numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map
as of the date of the Report.
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-F
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 11, T. 2 S, R. 6 W, S.B.M.
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
169-060-005
Project Site
169-060-005
GLEN ST
MISSION BLVD
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTNING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-G
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFONRIA PORTIONS OF PARCEL MAP 24088, RECORDED IN BOOK 177, PAGE 37 OF MAPS, PORTION OF PARCEL MAP 12104, RECORDED IN BOOK 168, PAGE 51 OF MAPS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
AS OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
175-210-032
175-210-034
175-210-062
175-210-063
VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines
and dimensions of the applicable
Assessor's Parcel Numbers, refer
to the County Assessor's Map
as of the date of the Report.
AGUA MANSA ROAD
174-210-062
±
175-210-034
175-210-063
175-210-032
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY
HALL AVENUE
BROWN AVENUE
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS
Part V – Assessment Rolls
The District’s FY 2023-24 Assessment Rolls are voluminous and are filed in the office of the City Clerk and are by reference herein made a part of this Report.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
www.WeAreHarris.com
Chris Thomas
Project Manager
Chris [email protected]
P: 619-481-5032
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING THE
PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT REGARDING
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023- 24 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; DD, EE, FF, II AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2- E, 2 -F AND 2 -G OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1- CONSOLIDATED
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
WHEREAS, the City Council (hereinafter the “City Council”) of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) has conducted proceedings for and has established City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California (hereinafter “JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C”) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter the “Streets and Highways Code”); for the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of multi -purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights-of- way; and graffiti abatement; and
WHEREAS, JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C presently consists of 47 Zones (hereinafter “Zone 4", “Zone 5", “Zone 6", “Zone 7", “Zone 9", “Zone 14", “Zone 16", “Zone 17", “Zone 21", “Zone 34", “Zone 61", “Zone 73", “Zone 78", “Zone 95", “Zone 102", “Zone 106", “Zone 126", “Zone 128", “Zone 132", “Zone 137", “Zone 141", “Zone 142", “Zone 173", “Zone 182” , “Zone A” , “Zone C” , “Zone E” , “Zone F” , “Zone G” , “Zone I”, “Zone K”, ”Zone L”, “Zone M”, Zone N”, “Zone O”, “Zone P”, “Zone S”, “Zone T”, “Zone U”, “Zone W”, “Zone X”, “Zone Y”, “Zone Z”, “Zone DD”, “Zone EE”, “Zone FF”, and “Zone II”, collectively “Zones”; and 21 Street Lighting Zones (hereinafter “Street Lighting Zone 5", “Street Lighting Zone 7", “Street Lighting Zone 15", “Street Lighting Zone 17", “Street Lighting Zone 19", “Street Lighting Zone 39", “Street Lighting Zone 41", “Street Lighting Zone 62", “Street Lighting Zone 69", “Street Lighting Zone 86", “Street Lighting Zone 91", “Street Lighting Zone 93", “Street Lighting Zone 94", “Street Lighting Zone 102", “Street Lighting Zone 2-A", “Street Lighting Zone 2-B", “Street Lighting Zone 2-C", “Street Lighting Zone 2-D", “Street Lighting Zone 2-E", “Street Lighting Zone 2-F" and “Street Lighting Zone 2-G", and, collectively “Street Lighting Zones”); and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code, ordering the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report (hereinafter the “Report”) in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of the Streets and Highways Code with regard to the assessments which are proposed to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S T, U, W,
-2-
X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for the 2023-24 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this action is statutorily exempt under CEQA guidelines Section 15273, as the funds from these assessments will be used for meeting operating expenses, purchasing supplies, materials or equipment, repair and maintenance and not for the extension of capital facilities.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the above recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 141, 142, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y and Z of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; and,
(b) The installation of irrigation and electrical facilities; and
(c) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone 4 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of multi-purpose trail lighting;
(c) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of off-leash dog park facilities.
In addition, Zones 5 and 21 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fencing.
In addition, Zones 14 and 16 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of decorative and monument lighting;
In addition, Zone 141 is authorized to provide the following:
-3-
(a) Maintenance and servicing of bio -swales within the public right -of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone 142 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public r ight-of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone A is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone C is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
In addition, Zones E, F, G, K, L, M, N, O, P, T, W and Y are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses
In addition, Zone I is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
(c) The maintenance of the landscape on the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue, at the frontage of the commercial parcel. -4-
In addition, Zone S is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone U is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone X is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping on Cantu -Galleano Ranch Road, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone Z is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 3. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 126, 128, and 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zones 78 and 137 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zone 137 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 4. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 106, 132, 173 and 182, and II of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
-5-
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 5. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, Y, and W are:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 6. Report. The City Engineer acting on behalf of the City, or his designee, is hereby designated Engineer (hereinafter the “Engineer”) and is ordered to prepare and file with the City Clerk the report with regard to the assessments proposed to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF, and II and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2- B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C to pay the costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fencing, fossil filter, bio -swale, and traffic signal improvements; and the provision of electricity for streetlights, and traffic signals for the 202 3- 2024 fiscal year, pursuant to Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of June, 2023.
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-6-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-47 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of June, 2023, by the following votes, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of June, 2023.
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-48
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; DD, EE, FF, II AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2- B, 2 -C, 2 -D, 2 -E, 2 -F AND 2 -G OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-
CONSOLIDATED OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PURSUANT TO
THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF LANDSCAPING, MULTI -
PURPOSE TRAILS, FENCING, FOSSIL FILTERS, BIO-SWALES,
GRAFFITI ABATEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BRIDGE LIGHTS, AND STREETLIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 23-24 ; AND GIVING NOTICE
OF AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING NOTICE OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING TO BE PUBLISHED
WHEREAS, the City Council (hereinafter the “City Council”) of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) has conducted proceedings for and has established the City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California (hereinafter "JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, which is Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter the "Streets and Highways Code"), for the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of multi-purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights-of- way; and graffiti abatement; and
WHEREAS, as ordered by the City Council, its Designee has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (hereinafter the " Report " ) regarding the assessments to be levied and collected within 40 Zones (hereinafter “Zone 4", “Zone 5", “Zone 6", “Zone 7", “Zone 9", “Zone 14", “Zone 16", “Zone 17", “Zone 21", “Zone 34", “Zone 61", “Zone 73", “Zone 78", “Zone 95", “Zone 102", “Zone 106", “Zone 126", “Zone 128", “Zone 132", “Zone 137", “Zone 141", “Zone 142", “Zone 173", “Zone 182” , “Zone A” , “Zone C” , “Zone E” , “Zone F” , “Zone G” , “Zone I”, “Zone K”, ”Zone L”, “Zone M”, Zone N”, “Zone O”, “Zone P”, “Zone S”, “Zone T”, “Zone U”, “Zone W”, “Zone X”, “Zone Y”, “Zone Z”, “Zone DD”, “Zone EE”, “Zone FF”, and “Zone II”, collectively “Zones”; and 21 Street Lighting Zones (hereinafter “Street Lighting Zone 5", “Street Lighting Zone 7", “Street Lighting Zone 15", “Street Lighting Zone 17", “Street Lighting Zone 19", “Street Lighting Zone 39", “Street Lighting Zone 41", “Str eet Lighting Zone 62", “Street Lighting Zone 69", “Street Lighting Zone 86", “Street Lighting Zone 91", “Street Lighting Zone 93", “Street Lighting Zone 94", “Street Lighting Zone 102", “Street Lighting Zone 2 -A", “Street Lighting Zone 2 -B", “Street Lighti ng Zone 2 -C", “Street Lighting Zone 2 -D", “Street Lighting Zone 2-E", “Street Lighting Zone 2 -F" and “Street Lighting Zone 2 -G" and, collectively “Street -2-
Lighting Zones”) of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for fiscal year 2023-24 to pay the costs of maintenance services and improvements as identified in the preceding recital, and the Report has been presented to and considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Report filed with the City Clerk states that the assessments to be levied in the respective Zones and Street Lighting Zones for fiscal year 2023-24 are in an amount that is the same as levied in fiscal year 2022-23, or increased by two percent ( 2%) or more than the assessments levied for fiscal year 2022-23 (based on the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U from March 2022 through March 2023), and are consistent with the terms of the ballot proposition approving the annexation of each zone; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code, which fixes and gives notice, pursuant to Section 22626(a) of the Streets and Highways Code, of the time and place of a public hearing on said Report and the annual assessments for fiscal year 2023-24;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the above recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings.
(a) The Report for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF, II; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C contains all matters required by Section 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code and may, therefore, be approved by the City Council; and
(b) The 2023-24 fiscal year assessment within Zone 4 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $36.14 per EDU; and within Zone 5 of L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $56.31 per parcel; and within Zone 6 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $257.76 per parcel; and within Zone 7 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $5.63 per acre; and within Zone 9 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $49.33 per parcel; and within Zone 14 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $76.99 per EDU; and within Zone 16 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $67.27 per EDU; and within Zone 17 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $647.09 per acre; and within Zone 21 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $240.90 per parcel; and within Zone 34 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $116.04 per parcel; and within Zone 61 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $106.88 per parcel; and within Zone 73 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $50.55 per parcel; and within Zone 78 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $653.33 per acre; and within Zone 95 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $130.48 per parcel; and within Zone 102 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $260.89 per parcel; and within Zone 106 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $447.06 per acre; and within Zone 126 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $12.53 per acre; and within Zone 128 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $34.09 per parcel; and within Zone 132 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $2,244.69 per acre; and within Zone 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $372.30 per acre; and within Zone 141 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $921.52 per acre; and within Zone 142 of JV -3-
L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $330.92 per EDU; and within Zone 173 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $442.11 per acre; and within Zone 182 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $3,211.67 per parcel; and within Zone A of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $9,992.15 per parcel; and within Zone C of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $2,295.58 per unit; and within Zone E of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $8,098.66 per parcel; and within Zone F of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $1,283.27 per parcel; and within Zone G of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,079.54 per parcel; and within Zone I of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,472.71 per parcel; and within Zone K of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $682.69 per unit; and within Zone L of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $3,100.63 per unit; and within Zone M of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $10,717.42 per parcel; and within Zone N of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $2,601.28 per parcel; and within Zone O of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $323.56 per unit; and within Zone P of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $5,265.10 per unit; and within Zone S of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,907.29 per parcel; and within Zone T of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $2,665.49 per unit; and within Zone U of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $6,568.04 per unit; and within Zone W of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $517.86 per parcel; and within Zone X of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $34,314.65 per parcel; and within Zone Y of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $3,537.05 per parcel; and within Zone Z of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $691.14 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 5 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $746.72 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 7 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $375.01per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 15 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $747.17 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 17 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $181.31 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 19 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $375.01 per parcel; and within Str eet Lighting Zone 39 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $80.82 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 41 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $114.86 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 62 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $250.10 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 69 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $401.41 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 86 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $186.87 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 91 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,003.07 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 93 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,914.24 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 94 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $350.03 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 102 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $140.05 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-A of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $262.58 per unit; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-B of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $103.19 per unit; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-C of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $37.37 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-D of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $503.71 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-E of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $196.09 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1- C is $26.52 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-G of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $26.52 per parcel . The Re port proposes a two percent (2%) inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 4, 6, 7, 9 and 173 over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2022-23 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones. The Report proposes no inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 5, 61, 95, 102, 126, 128, 141, and 142 over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2022-23 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones. The Report proposes a 4.57% inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 73, 78, 106, 132, 137, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, W over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2022-23 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones. Fiscal year 2023-2024 is the first year of assessment for Zone DD, EE, FF, II and Streetlight Zone 2-G, therefore, no inflationary increase is applied for the fiscal year 2023- 2024 levy. The Report proposes a 10.17 % inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable in Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, -4-
2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2022-23 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.
Section 3. Intent. The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF, and II; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, and 2-G of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C. There are no parcels or lots within said zones that are owned by a federal or state governmental agency. There are four parcels or lots within said zones that are owned by the local agency (City of Jurupa Valley) and are not subject to special assessment. The assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as property taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of property taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments.
Section 4. Description of Services and Improvements to be provided . The improvements authorized for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 141, 142, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, P, T, U, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; and,
(b) The installation of irrigation and electrical facilities; and
(c) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone 4 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of multi-purpose trail lighting;
(c) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of off-leash dog park facilities.
In addition, Zones 5 and 21 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fencing.
In addition, Zones 14 and 16 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of decorative and monument lighting;
In addition, Zone 141 is authorized to provide the following:
-5-
(a) Maintenance and servicing of bio -swales within the public right -of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone 142 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone A is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone C is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
In addition, Zones E, F, G, K, L, M, N, O, P, T, W, and Y are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses
In addition, Zone I is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
-6-
(c) The maintenance of the landscape on the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue, at the frontage of the commercial parcel.
In addition, Zone S is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone U is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone X is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping on Cantu -Galleano Ranch Road, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone Z is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 5. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 126, 128, and 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zones 78 and 137 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zone 137 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
-7-
Section 6. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 106, 132, 173 and 182 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 7. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, DD, EE, FF, and II are:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 8. The District. The district is identified as “City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Mainte nance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California”. The boundaries of 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF, and II, and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2- D, 2-E, 2-F, DD, EE, FF, and II of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are located within the City of Jurupa Valley and are described and shown in the Report.
Section 9. Report. The Report, which is on file with the City Clerk and which has been presented to the City Council, is hereby approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District, and any zones therein, and the annual assessments to be levied upon assessable lots and parcels within 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF, and II and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C.
Section 10. Public Hearing. A Public Hearing will be held on July 6, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. or thereafter, at the City of Jurupa Valley Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 regarding the Report and the proposed assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2020-21 within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF, and II and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2- E, 2-F, of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C.
Section 11. Information. Any property owner desiring additional information regarding 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF, and II, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2- F, of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C., the Report, or the proposed assessments shall contact the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley.
-8-
Section 12. Notice of the Public Hearing. Notices of the public hearing shall be given consistent with Section 22626(a) of the Streets and Highways Code. The notice of the public hearing shall be given by publication in an appropriate newspaper of a certified copy of this Resolution once at least ten (10) days prior to July 6, 2023. Said publication of this Resolution is to be effected by the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Section 13. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.
Section 15. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of June, 2023.
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-9-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-48 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of June, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of June, 2023.
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEAL NO. 23001 : MINOR
CHANGE NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37211 (TTM37211M1), A REQUEST TO MODIFY CONDITION NO. 3.15 REGARDING ELECTRICAL
LINE UNDERGROUNDING ALONG PACIFIC AVENUE AND DETERMINE
THAT NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162(a); LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CANAL STREET AND OPAL STREET (APNS: 177 -130-007 & 177 -142- 018); (APPLICANT: SEQUANATA PARTNERS, LP)
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and consider the following alternatives:
a. Sustain the Planning Commission ’s decision and adopt Resolution No. 2023-44, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUP A VALLEY AFFIRMING THE PLANNING COMMISSION ’S DECISION TO DENY MINOR CHANGE NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37211 (TTM37211M1) WHICH REQUESTED THE DELETION OF CONDITIONS NOS. 1.12 AND 2.15 REGARDING ESTABLISHING A CFD FOR
LANDSCAPING AND WATER QUALITY MANA GEMENT FEATURES,
AND CONDITION NO. 3.15 REGARDING THE UNDERGROUNDING OF
UTILITY LINES ALONG PACIFIC AVENUE, AND DETERMINING THAT
NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15162
b. Approve the appeal to the Planning Commission decision and proceed with the implementation of the alternative remedy proposed by the staff. This alternative entails the specific requirement of undergrounding utilities exclusively along the frontage of the property. As a result, staff will prepare
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
a drafte d resolution for the City Council's consideration at the upcoming Regular meeting.
APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL
The Planning Commission denied Minor Change No. TTM37211M1 resulting in the Applicant submitting an appeal on March 22, 2023. The proposed amendments to certain conditions were rejected by the Planning Commission. The following are the revisions required.
Condition No. 1.12 requires the owner to form a Community Facilitie s District (CFD) for landscape maintenance.
Request: Change the responsibility of landscape maintenance from the City to Homeowner Association (HOA).
Condition No. 2.15 requires the developer to initiate the formation of, or annexation to, if one alread y exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) for operation and maintenance of post-construction water quality management features and facilities (BMPs).
Request: Change the responsibility of the operation and maintenance of BMPs from the City to HOA.
Condition No. 3.15 requires the undergrounding of electrical power, telephone, communication, street lighting, and cable television lines. The developer is responsible for coordinating the work with the serving utility company.
Request: Modify the condit ion to not require the undergrounding of the electric service lines that traverse State-Route (SR) 60. The applicant intends to satisfy the requirement of undergrounding the lower lines and pole that does not traverse SR-
60. The applicant's appeal solely pertains to the Planning Commission's denial of modifying Engineering Condition No. 3.15 to eliminate the obligation of undergrounding the highest electrical lines crossing over State Route 60 (SR -60) and the associated power poles, along the project's fron tage. However, the applicant agrees to comply with the requirement of undergrounding the lower electrical lines on Pacific Avenue along the project's frontage.
MINOR CHANGE REQUEST
The Minor Change application pertains to the Conditions of Approval associ ated with Tentative Tract Map No. 37211, commonly referred to as Sequanata Heights Tract, which involves the subdivision of a 10.4-acre property into 48 single-family residential lots, each with a minimum size of 6,000 square feet. The subdivision also includes two water quality basin lots (lots A and B) and three letter street lots (A-C). Furthermore, the project included the approval of CZ17003, which changed the zoning classification of the project site from
Page | 3
R-1 (One-Family Dwellings) to R-4 (Planned Residential). The project was initially granted approval on March 21, 2019.
The applicant has submitted a request (Attachment 2) to modify Condition No. 3.15 in light of the significant expenses and extensive coordination time involved in implementing the required improvements along the frontage of Pacific Avenue. Specifically, the undergrounding of the highest power lines along this route is projected to incur costs amounting to $616,850. Moreover, due to the power lines traversing the State Route 60, coordination efforts with multiple government agencies, including the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) and the California Highway Patrol, would be necessary. Such coordination would also entail managing highway closures.
In addition to the pr oposed improvements, the Conditions of Approval also require the construction of a 13-foot-high freeway sound wall, spanning 1,117 linear feet along the 60 freeway. This cost of constructing the sound wall , coupled with the requirements of undergrounding power line, is estimated to cost approximately $2.3 million. The direct cost per lot for the tract is expected to exceed $61,000.
These two off -site improvements highlight the financial implications and logistical complexities associated with fulfilling the required improvements along Pacific Avenue, underscoring the rationale behind the applicant's request for modification.
The proposed amendment to the Condition of Approval exempts the requirement for undergrounding the highest power lines and associated p ower poles depicted in Exhibit No. 1, indicated in red. However, it should be noted that the applicant still intends to comply with the condition by undergrounding the lower lines depicted in yellow.
EXHIBIT NO. 1 – ELECTRICAL UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
HEARINGS AND PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Minor Change request on January 11, 2023. However, the item was subsequently continued to February 22, 2023,
Page | 4
to allow the applicant to meet with the Public Works, Engineering Department, and the Community Development Department to explore potential options regarding their original request.
On February 22, 2023, the Planning Commission reconvened the public hearing for the Minor Change. The meeting provided an opportunity for all interested parties to express their views to the Planning Commission concerning the project. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission formally closed the public hearing an d engaged in deliberations on the subject. The outcome of these deliberations was the direction to prepare and present a resolution at the March 8, 2023, Planning Commission meeting, which would deny the Minor Change application. The direction to deny the Minor Change application was approved by a vote of (4-0), with Chair Pro Tem Newman absent.
On March 8, 2023, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC -2023-03, thereby denying Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 (TTM37211M1).
Furthermore, they upheld Engineering Condition No. 1.12, 2.15, and 3.15, and determined that no additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is necessary.
ANALYSIS OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
On March 8, 2023, the Planning Commissi on considered the possibility of waiving the requirement to underground utility lines, as stated in Engineering Condition No. 3.15.
However, the Commission concluded that such a waiver would have a detrimental impact on public health, safety, and welfare. During their discussions, the Commissioners acknowledged the susceptibility of the City of Jurupa Valley to strong winds and fires, particularly due to its dry and hot weather conditions. These weather conditions increase the risk of utility lines being t oppled by strong winds, which can potentially lead to fires.
Consequently, modifying the condition to retain above -ground utility lines would exacerbate the exposed electrical risk, weather -related hazards, and fire danger, thus endangering public safety and welfare.
Under the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 7.50.010.G, developers are granted the opportunity to request a waiver or appeal specific requirements related to the installation of electrical lines. However, for a waiver to be granted, the revi ewing body must make certain determinations:
1. The costs associated with undergrounding existing utility lines or paying the in-lieu fee would impose an unjustifiable financial burden on the developer, disproportionate to the customary and reasonable costs o f constructing the development, as verified by the City Engineer.
2. The utilization of overhead facilities is not inconsistent with the objectives and intentions of the relevant section.
3. Granting the waiver would not result in any adverse impact on public health, safety, or welfare.
4. The developer is not receiving any special privileges that are not ordinarily granted to neighboring properties.
Page | 5
After considering these criteria, the Planning Commission concluded that the waiver cannot be approved due to the pro vision in Section 7.50.010.G.3, which explicitly states that granting a waiver should not result in any negative impact on public health, safety, or welfare.
As a result, the Planning Commission made the necessary findings to deny the requested modifications to Engineering Condition No. 3.15.
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE REMEDY FOR UNDERGROUNDING
After the Planning Commission action, Staff developed an alternative proposal for the appeal, recommended as a separate alternative for consideration by the City Council.
This proposed alternative suggests an interpretation of Condition No. 3.15 that would require the undergrounding of utility lines solely along the segment in front of the property in question. The specific details of this alternative are outlined below:
Pole #1, which is located on the Developer’s property, would remain unchanged. Pole #1.5 would be removed.
Pole #2, which is located on the adjacent property, can be retained, but the utility lines between poles 1 and 2 must be undergrounded, resulting in the undergrounding of approximately 240 linear feet of utilities.
It should be noted that if Southern California Edison mandates the removal of Pole #2, the developer may be required to underground the utility lines up to Pole #3, as illustrated In Exhibit No. 2 below. However, this alternative does not entail the more extensive task of undergrounding utilities across State Route 60.
This proposed alternative o ffers the City Council two distinct options to choose from, facilitating a comprehensive assessment of the matter at hand. Staff has discussed this alternative with the applicant, and they have expressed agreement with this proposed course of action.
Page | 6
EXHIBIT NO. 2 - ALTERNATIVE FOR UNDERGROUNDING
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On March 21, 2019, the city officially adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project, ensuring compliance with the California Environmental Qua lity Act (CEQA).
In light of the minor change request, a comprehensive evaluation has been conducted to compare the proposed appeal's potential impacts with the analysis presented in the previous MND. The primary objective was to determine whether approving or denying the appeal would introduce new significant impacts or substantially intensify the severity of previously assessed impacts.
After a thorough review, the City's CEQA Administrator has concluded that the analyses and conclusions drawn in the MND remain valid. Based on this evaluation, it has been determined that the proposed alternatives will not give rise to new significant impacts nor significantly exacerbate the severity of impacts previously identified. The current project under consideration falls within the scope of the earlier MND, as outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a). For detailed information, please refer to Exhibit A of the City Council Resolution.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
The June 15, 2023 City Council hearing regarding the project was duly noticed by the Community Development Department. To ensure proper notification, 10 -day hearing notices were mailed to property owners residing within 1,000 feet of the project site's boundaries. Furthermore, a 10 -day legal advertisement wa s published in the Press Enterprise.
As of the preparation of this report, there have been no public comments or concerns received regarding the project.
Page | 8
ATTACHMENTS
1. City Council Resolution No. 2023-44
a) Exhibit A – Previous Environmental Determination
2. Appeal Request for TTM37211M1
3. Adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-03
4. Planning Commission Staff Report for 3/8/2023 (No Attachments)
5. Planning Commission Staff Report for 2/22/2023 (No Attachments)
6. Planning Commission Minutes for 2/22/2023
7. Approved TTM37211 & Development Plan
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA , AFFIRMING THE
PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO DENY MINOR
CHANGE NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37211
(TTM37211M1) WHICH REQUESTED THE DELETION OF
CONDITIONS NO S. 1.12 AND 2.15 REGARDING
ESTABLISHING A CFD FOR LANDSCAPING AND WATER
QUALITY MANAGEMENT FEATURES, AND CONDITION
NO. 3.15 REGARDING THE UNDERGROUNDING OF
UTILITY LINES ALONG PACIFIC AVENUE, AND
DETERMINING TH AT NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW IS
REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15162
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Project. Sequanata Partners, LP (the “Applicant) applied for Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 (Master Plan Application No. 20117) to modify Engineering Department Conditions of Approval to no longer comply with Condition Nos. 1.12,
2.15, and 3.15 regarding the formation of , or annexation into, a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the maintenance of landscaping and the operation and maintenance of post-construction water quality management feature s and facilities (BMPs) and t he undergrounding of certain electric service lines (the “Project”).
Section 2. Appeal. On March 8, 2023, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a duly n oticed public hearing. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC -2023-03 denying the Project. The Applicant subsequently appealed the Planning Commission’s decision.
Section 3. Minor Changes to Tentative Tract Map Authority. (a) On March 21, 2019, the City Council initially approved Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 and Change of Zone No. 17003 (known collectively as MA17099). TTM No. 37211 approved a Schedule “A” subdivision of the 10.4 -acre property into 48 singl e-family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet; two (2) water quality basin lots (Lots A and B) and three (3) letter street lots (A -C). Additionally, the project included the approval of CZ17003 to change the zoning classification of the project site from R-1 (One-Family Dwellings) to R-4 (Planned Residential).
(b) The City Council originally approved Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 on March 21, 2019.
(c) The Applicant filed an application for the Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 (TTM37211M1) on July 21, 2020.
-2-
(d) The Applicant is seeking Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 (TTM37211M1) to delete Engineering Department’s Condition of Approval Nos. 1.12 and
2.15 which read as follows:
1.12. The owner will be required to form a Community Facilities District (CFD) for landscape maintenance.
2.15. The Developer shall init iate the formation of, or annexation to, if one already exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the operation and maintenance of post -construction water quality management features and facilities (BMPs).
(e) The Applicant is also seeking to modify Co ndition 3.15 which reads as follows:
3.15. Electrical power, telephone, communication, street lighting, and cable television lines shall be designed to be placed underground per Riverside County Ordinances 460 and 461, as adopted by the City. The Project Proponent is responsible for coordinating the work with the serving utility company. This requirement applies to underground existing overhead electrical lines, which are 33.6 kilovolts or below along the project frontage and between the nearest poles offsite in each direction of the project site, including services that originate from poles on the far side of the street. A disposition note describing the above shall be reflected on design improvement plans whenever those plans are required. Written proof c onfirming the initiation of the design of utility improvements or relocations issued by the utility company shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for verification purposes.
Specifically, the Applicant seeks to modify this condition to leave the highest electrical lines that traverse the 60 freeway above ground while undergrounding the lower electrical lines.
(f) Section 7.15.210 of Chapter 7.15 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides the procedure for a minor change to a previously approved tentative map. (g) Pursuant to Section 7.15.210, any request for approval of a minor change to a previously approved tenta tive map must be filed with the Planning Department. The Planning Director must make a recommendation to the body having jurisdiction over the underlying map and notice a public hearing in accordance with Section 7.15.130 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code unless the underlying map did not previously require a hearing. The Planning Commission may decide the matter when it appears on the agenda, or it may continue the matter with or without the consent of the land divider. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless the decision is appealed to the City Council. The approval by the Planning Commission of a minor change shall not affect the time period within which the land divider must prepare and file the final map.
-3-
(h) Section 7.15.200(B) provides that proceedings on a revised tentative map shall be conducted in the same manner as for the original approval of a tentative map except those procedures that are not applicable. Section 7.15.180 states that a tentative map shall be denied if it does not meet all requirements of this title, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development;
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development;
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
6) That the design of the proposed land div ision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems; 7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; 8) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with r espect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.
Section 4. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 20117 was processed, including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On February 22 , 2023 , the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 20117, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony , the Planning Commi ssion closed the public hearing and provided direction to staff to prepare a resolution to deny the Project. -4-
(c) On March 8, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC - 2023-03 denying the Project and upholding Engineering Condition Nos. 1.12, 2.15 and 3.15. The Applicant subsequently appealed the Planning Commission’s decision. (d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 5. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) On March 21, 2019, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project in compliance with CEQA. The proposed Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 (TTM37211M1) is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. The City has prepared a Previous Environmental Document Review analysis attached as Exhibit “A”. The City Council has reviewed the administrative record, and based on its own independent judgment, finds that no further environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.
(b) The proposed Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 (TTM37211M1) has been evaluated against the previous analysis in the MND, to ensure that the requested modifications do not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously. It has been determined that the analyses and the conclusions in the MND remain valid and that the project currently under review is “within the scope” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (a) (c) The custodian of records for the MND prepared for Tentative Tract Map No. 37211 and the Previous Environmental Document Review Determination, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council’s action is based, is the Community Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those doc uments are available for public review in the Community Development Department at 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.
Section 6. Findings for Denial of Minor Change No. 1
(a) Conditions 1.12 and 2.15 : The City Council denies the request to modify Conditions 1.12 and 2.15 because the proposed changes to the map are not consistent with the General Plan and the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 6.05, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, and Chapter 9.283, Water Efficiency La ndscaping Design Requirements, requiring off-site landscaping and water quality management features. Conditions
1.12. and 2.15 are important because they require off -site landscaping and water quality management features to be maintained by the City of Ju rupa Valley through a CFD. The direct management by the City will assist in maintaining and funding these features in perpetuity and ensure that they are suitable for general safety, health, and welfare. Modifying these conditions, as requested by the Applicant, so that a homeowner’s association would maintain them, does not provide the same level of management nor is there any assurance that the landscaping and water quality management features will be properly funded and maintained. The proposed change is not -5-
consistent with General Plan Program CSSF 2.2 which creates a framework to provide a high level of community services and facilities to meet the existing and future needs of Jurupa Valley. CSSF
2.2 aims to ensure the provision of sufficient public f acilities and services concurrently with new development and this includes the maintenance and operation of public right-of-way landscaping and water control features for new development.
(b) Condition 3.15: Section 7.50.010(G) provides that an applicant can request a waiver from the undergrounding requirement. The developer is required to underground utilities pursuant to Condition 3.15, but is now seeking a partial waiver of this requirement. A waiver may be granted if the reviewing body determines that:
1) The costs of undergrounding existing utility lines and/or paying the in-lieu fee would present a financial burden upon the developer that is unfairly out of proportion to the customary and reasonable costs of constructing the development, as verified by th e City Engineer;
2) The use of overhead facilities is not inconsistent with the goals and purposes of this section;
3) Granting the waiver would not otherwise result in a negative impact to the public health, safety or welfare; and
4) The developer is not receiv ing a special privilege not otherwise enjoyed by other property in the vicinity.
(c) In denying the request for a waiver, the City Council makes the following findings:
1) The use of overhead facilities is inconsistent with the goals and purposes of Section 7.50 .010 of the Municipal Code which is to protect the health and safety of the community by having all new and existing electrical power, telephone or other communication, street lighting, and cable television lines placed underground. The use of overhead fa cilities is also inconsistent with Policy ME2.11 of the General Plan which provides that the City should require street improvements as a condition of new developments, including undergrounding of utility lines. In addition, the use of overhead lines is i nconsistent with Policy COS 9.3 of the General Plan that states that in and near public streets, features that clutter, degrade, intrude on, or obstruct view should be avoided.
The waiver would result in a negative impact to the public health, safety or w elfare. The City of Jurupa Valley is prone to strong winds and fires due to dry and hot weather. This can result in utility lines being felled by the strong winds which can lead to fires. Undergrounding utilities in fire prone areas reduces the risk of wildfires. Waiving this condition would result in a negative impact to the public safety or welfare as it would not mitigate the fire risk posed by having utility lines above ground.
Section 7. Denial of Master Application No. 20117. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby denies Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map -6-
No. 37211 (TTM37211M1) maintaining in place the Engineering Department’s Condition of Approval Nos. 1.12, 2.15, and 3.15.
Section 8. Certification. The City Cle rk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of June 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-7-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-44 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of June 2023 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of June 2023.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
ATTACHMENTS NO. 1.A
EXHIBIT A: Previous Environmental Document
Previous Environmental Document
MA20117
for
Minor Change
Tentative Tract Map No. 37211M1
Lead Agency
City of Jurupa Valley
8390 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Roberto Gonzalez, Senior Planner
(951) 332-6464 ext. 149
[email protected]
Project Proponent:
Sequanota Partners, LP
556 S. Fairfax Oaks Avenue, Suite 337
Pasadena, CA. 91005
December 19, 2022
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
2 1.0 DETERMINATION
Based on the evaluation in this document, I find that no substantial changes are proposed in the Project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the Project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous IS/MND due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidel ines Section 15162(a)(3) . Therefore, the Project is “within the scope” of the previously adopted CEQA document . According to PRC §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162, CEQA does not require the preparation of any further environmental review.
City of Jurupa Valley
Signature Lead Agency
Joe Perez, Community Development Director December 19, 2022 Printed Name/Title Date
2.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT REVIEW (PED)
Once a n environmental impact determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has been approved or certified for a project, no further action is required unless further discretionary approval for that project is required. CEQA Guidelines §15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, allows a previously adopted EIR or MND to be used as the environmental assessment for a project requiring further discretionary approval if it is determined that the Project currently under review does not propo se substantial changes to the previously adopted or certified CEQA documentation that would:
1) Create one or more new significant impacts.
2) Create impacts that are more severe.
3) Require major revisions to the CEQA document.
This PED has been prepared to determine if the Minor Change(s) in conditions of approval request is within the scope of the analysis contained in the Final Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration, Master Application 17099, Change of Zone 17003, Tentative Tract Map 37211 (“IS/MND") adopted by the City Council on March 21, 2019 by Resolution No. 2019-02, to ensure that by approval , the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously.
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
3 The previously adopted Final IS/MND is on file with the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, and is hereby incorporated by reference according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150.
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The approved Tentative Tract Map (T TM) propose s to subdivide 10.4-acres property into 48 residential lots, 2 water quality basin lots, and 3 lettered street lots and the construction of associated infrastructure. The project is located at the intersection of Canal and Opal Streets, north of State Route 60, and east of Pacific Avenue. APNs: 177-130-007 and 177-142-018.
This is the Minor Change request to modify the following conditions of approval as follows:
1. Condition No. 1.12: “Owner will be required to form a Community Facilities District (CFD) for landscape maintenance”. Owners request that all landscape maintenance be performed by the Homeowner’s Association.
2. Condition No. 2.15 “the Developer shall initiate formation of, or annexation to if one already exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) for operation and maintenance of post construction water quality management features and facilities (BMPs) . Owners request that operation and maintenance of post construction water quality management features and facilities (BMPs) be performed by the Homeowner’s Association.
3. Condition No. 3.15 : “Electrical power, telephone, communication, street lighting and cable television lines shall be designed to be placed underground in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances 460 and 461 as adopted by the City. The Project Proponent is responsible for coordinating the work with the serving utility company. This requirement applies to underground existing overhead electrical lines which are 33.6 kilovolts or below along the project frontage between the nearest poles on the far side of the street.…”. Owner requests to modify this condition to leave the highest elect rical lines that traverse the 60 freeway remain while underground the lower electrical lines per the condition.
The minor change request does not propose to amend boundaries or change the number of lots, additionally, changes to Condition No. 1.12 and 2.15 do not propose any changes to infrastructure or utilities that are different than the previously approved TTM. The minor change request for Condition No. 3.15 would result in maintaining the current location and condition of existing aboveground electrical utility lines traversing SR60.
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
4 4.0 ANALYSIS
Previously Identified Environmental Impacts
The adopted IS/MND determined that the previously approved TTM would result in no impacts or less than significant environmental impacts under the following issue areas: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials (including Wildfire), Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utility and Service Systems.
The adopted IS/MND determined that the development accommodated by the TTM would result in potentially significant impacts to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources (archaeological and paleontological), Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources. Required mitigation measures for each issue area impact(s) were determined to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
Current Environmental Impacts
When the TTM was approved in 2019, the Project site was highly disturbed land adjacent to SR-
60. The physical setting for the Project has not significantly changed since the adoption of the MND on March 21, 2019. The Project site remains undeveloped, vacant land, and none of the surrounding land uses have changed since then. In addition, there have been no new projects approved in the Project area that would affect the physical environment surrounding the Project site. Because construction has not occurred and the property remains highly disturbed, the environmental impacts identified in 2019 remain the same as indicated in the aerial photographs from 2019 and 2022 in Exhibits 4.0-1 and 4.0-2.
Exhibit 4.0-1 Aerial Photograph August 2019
Source Google Earth Pro
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
5 Exhibit 4.0-2 Aerial Photograph December 2022
Source Google Earth Pro
Applicability of the 2019 Adopted Final IS/MND
The request for minor change in conditions of approval does not propose to amend boundaries, change the number of lots, change the design, or propose any changes to infrastructure or utilities that are different than existing conditions and those previously analyzed in the adopted MND. The power lines subject to the requested change in Condition No 3.15 are existing electrical lines and therefore no new environmental impacts will occur with maintaining their current location. The Mitigation a nd Monitoring Program adopted on March 21, 2019, remains in full force and applies to the Project.
The Community Development Department, through Interagency Development Review Process, has determined that there are no new or substantially different issues raised by the Project, including, but not limited to, ability to serve with utilities (line extensions, etc.), access problems (fire trucks, emergency access, traffic safety), drainage, water quality, grading, or requirements to dedicate and improve publi c facilities or roads, that would result in physical impacts to the environment.
If the minor changes are approved, the Project will incorporate the following as required by the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with the IS/MND:
Plans, Policies, or Programs These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project -based on federal, state, or local law currently in place, which effectively reduce environmental impacts. Mitigation Measures (MM) These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
6 would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance with the provisions of CEQA. The MMs are summarized below.
MM-BIO-1: Pre-Construction Burrowing Owl Survey. Within 30 calendar days prior to grading on proposed property, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey of the proposed impact footprint and make a determination regarding the presence or absence of the burrowing owl. The determination shall be documented in a report and shall be submitted, reviewed, and accepted by the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit and subject to the following provisions:
a). In the event that the pre‐construction survey identifies no burrowing owls in the impact area, a grading permit may be issued without restriction.
b). In the event that the pre‐construction survey identifies the presence of at least one individual but less than three (3) mating pairs of burrowing owl, then prior to the issuance of a grading permit and prior to the commencement of ground‐disturbing activities on the property, the qualified biologist shall passively or actively relocate any burrowing owls. Passive relocation, including the required use of one‐way doors to exclude owls from the site and the collapsing of burrows, will occur if the biologist determines that the proximity and availability of alternate habitat is suitable for successful passive relocation. Passive relocation shall follow California Department of Fish and Wildlife relocation protocol. If proximate alternate habitat is not present as determined by the biologist, active relocation shall follow California Department of Fish and Wildlife relocation protocol. The biologist shall confirm in writing to the Planning Department that the species has fledged or been relocated prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
MM-BIO-2: Coordination With USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall contact the United State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to positively determine whether or not either agency wishes to exert jurisdiction of the onsite drainage feature. If either agency decides to exert jurisdiction, Mitigation Measures BIO-3 and BIO-4 shall be implemented.
MM-BIO-3: CDFW Jurisdiction . If state jurisdictional authority is exercised under Mitigation Measure BIO-2, the following shall be implemented: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project applicant shall obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The following shall be incorporated into the permitting, subject to approval by the regulatory agencies: (a) Replacement and/or restoration of jurisdictional “waters of the State” within the Santa Ana River watershed at a ratio of not less than 1:1 onsite or not less than 2:1 for permanent impacts; (b) The applicant shall restore any onsite or offsite temporary impact areas to pre‐project conditions and revegetate where applicable; and (c) Off‐site mitigation may occur on land acquired for th e purpose of in‐perpetuity preservation, or through the purchase of mitigation credits at an agency approved off‐site mitigation bank or within an agency‐accepted off‐site permittee responsible mitigation area such as the Santa Ana Watershed Project Area ( SAWPA), Prado Basin, or an appropriate nearby downstream established mitigation bank area.
MM-BIO-4: Federal Jurisdiction. If federal jurisdictional authority is exercised under Mitigation Measure BIO-2, the following shall be implemented: Prior to issuan ce of a grading permit, the developer shall obtain a Clean Water Act Section 404 Nation -Wide Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and compensate for the loss of more than 0.1 acre of wetlands and 1,278 lineal MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
7 feet of streambed channel, and a Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board These permits will address impacts to identified jurisdictional resources on the Project site and appropriate offsite mitigation such as such as the Santa Ana Watershed Project Area (SAWPA), Prado Basin, or an appropriate nearby downstream established mitigation bank area. The developer shall implement this measure to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department.
MM-BIO-5: Nesting Bird Survey . As a condition of approval for all grading permits, vegetation clearing and ground disturbance shall be prohibited during the migratory bird nesting season (February 1 through October 1), unless a migratory bird nesting survey is completed in accordance with the following requirements:
a. A migratory nesting bird survey of the Project’s impact footprint shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three business (3) days prior to initiating vegetation clearing or ground disturbance.
b. A copy of the migratory nesting bird survey results report shall be provided to the City of Jurupa Planning Department. If the survey identifies the presence of active nests, then the qualified biologist shall provide the Planning Department with a copy of maps showing the location of all nests and an appropriate buffer zone around each nest sufficient to protect the nest from direct and indirect impact. The size and location of all buffer zones, if required, shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department and shall be no less than a 300‐foot radius around the nest for non‐raptors and a 500‐foot radius around the nest for raptors. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved buffer zone shall be marked in the field with construction fencing, within which no vegetation clearing or ground disturbance shall commence until the qualified biologist and Planning Department verify that the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.
MM-BIO-6:-Tree Preservation and Replacement. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the measure listed below (or equivalent language) shall appear on all Project grading plans, construction specifications and bid documents, and the City shall ensure such language is incorporated prior to issuance of any permits:
“Prior to the removal of any trees, the issuance of a grading permit, or approval of a Site Development Permit, whichever comes first, a Tree Removal and Planting and Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department that demonstrates that the following will be implemented:
1). The trees along Opal Street and Canal Street. identified in the Tree Survey prepared by BrightView Design Group, April 24, (Appendix D of the Initial Study Checklist for MA 17009) shall be replaced at a 3:1 ratio with an approved species as determined by the City’s Planning Department. Tree selection must be at least 15- gallon purchased from quality nursery stock. This number of trees is above the number identified in the Project’s Landscape Plan”.
MM-CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring. A qualified archaeologist (the “Project Archaeologist”) shall be retained by the developer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The Project Archaeologist will be on-call to monitor ground-disturbing activities and excavations on the Project site following identification of potential cultural resources by project personnel. If archaeological resources are encountered during implementation of the Project, ground-disturbing activities will be temporarily MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
8 redirected from the vicinity of the find. The Project Archaeologist will be allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or excavation activities in the vicinity in order to make an evaluation of the find. If the resource is significant, Mitigation Measure CR‐2 shall apply.
MM-CR-2: Archeological Treatment Plan. If a significant archaeological resource(s) is discovered on the property, ground disturbing activities shall be suspended 100 feet around the resource(s).
The archaeological monitor, the Project Proponent, and the City Planning Department shall confer regarding mitigation of the discovered resource(s). A treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented by the archaeologist to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall contain a research design and data recovery program necessary to document the size and content of the discovery such that the resource(s) can be evaluated for significance under CEQA criteria. The research design shall list the sampling procedures appropriate to exhaust the research potential of the archaeological resource(s) in accordance with current professional archaeology standards (typically this sampling level is two (2) to five (5) percent of the volume of the cultural deposit). At the completion of the laboratory analysis, any recovered archaeological resources shall be processed and curated according to current professional repository standards. The collections and associated records shall be donated to an appropriate curation facility. A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department and the Eastern Information Center.
MM-CR-3: Paleontological Monitoring: A qualified paleontologist (the “Project Paleontologist”) shall be retained by the developer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The Project Paleontologist will be on -call to monitor ground-disturbing activities and excavations on the Project site following identification of potential paleontological resources by project personnel. If paleontological resources are encountered during implementation of the Project, ground - disturbing acti vities will be temporarily redirected from the vicinity of the find. The Project Paleontologist will be allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or excavation activities in the vicinity in order to make an evaluation of the find. If the resource i s significant, Mitigation Measure CR‐4 shall apply.
MM-CR‐4: Paleontological Treatment Plan : If a significant paleontological resource(s) is discovered on proposed property, in consultation with the Project proponent and the City, the qualified paleontologist shall develop a plan of mitigation which shall include salvage excavation and removal of the find, removal of sediment from around the specimen (in the laboratory), research to identify and categorize the find, curation in the find a local qualified repository, and preparation of a report summarizing the find.
MM-NOI-1: Construction Noise Mitigation Plan : Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the developer is required to submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan to the City Planning Department for review and approval. The plan must depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment will be mitigated during construction of thi s project. In addition, the plan shall require that the notes from the approved Mitigation Monitoring Plan are included on grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors.
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
9 a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the months of October through May.
b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards. c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site. d) Construction equipment s taging areas shall be located the greatest distance between the staging area and the nearest sensitive receptors.”
MM-NOI-2: Sound Walls: Prior to issuance of building permits, a final noise study based on final precise grading plan elevations shall be pr epared by a qualified acoustician and approved by the City to validate appropriate noise barrier heights, locations, and construction materials. Sound walls are required around all habitable exterior backyard and sideyard areas for all lots (See Exhibit C of Noise Impact Analysis, Appendix K of this Initial Study Checklist) for specific wall heights and locations. All required noise barriers shall be designed to reduce noise levels to below 65 dBA CNEL within private exterior areas (i.e., backyards) of residential lots. The noise barriers may consist of any material (block, tempered glass, earthen berm, etc.) or combination of materials that achieves the required noise attenuation and shall have no decorative cutouts or other line‐of‐sight openings between shielded areas and the noise source (adjacent roadway). Prior to issuance of building permits, the City of Jurupa Valley shall review and approve the noise barrier design, placement, and materials to ensure that the required level of sound attenuation will be achieved.
MM-NOI-3: Interior Noise Analysis: Prior to issuance of any residential building permit, an interior noise analysis shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department demonstrating that proposed building materials will achieve interior noise levels less than 45 dBA CNEL. Measures that would facilitate compliance with the 45dBA CNEL interior noise standard include, but are not limited to:
a) A “windows closed” condition is required to meet interior noise standards for all homes. b) Upgraded windows and sliding glass doors are required on all homes. See Tables 5 and 6 of Noise Impact Analysis, Appendix K of this Initial Study Checklist for specific STC requirements. c) Attic and roof vents that directly face the SR-60, if applicable, shall include an acoustical baffle to prevent vehicle noise intrusion. See Exhibits D and E of Noise Impact Analysis, Appendix K of this Initial Study Checklist for examples acoustical baffles. The contractor may install similar measures to provide noise reduction.
d) For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows, doors, and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum.
MM-TCR-1: Native American Monitoring, Treatment of Discoveries, and Disposition of Discoveries:
MONITORING: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall contact the consulting Native American Tribe(s) that have requested monitoring through consultation with the City during the AB 52 process. The applicant shall coordinate with the Tribe to develop a Tribal Monitoring Agreement(s). A copy of the agreement shall be provided to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
10 TREATMENT OF DISCOVERIES: If a significant tribal cultural resource is discovered on the property, ground disturbing activities shall be suspended 100 feet around the resource(s). A representative of the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the Project Proponent, and the City Planning Department shall confer regarding mitigation of the discovered resource(s). A treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented to protect the identified tribal cultural resources from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall contain a research design and data recovery program necessary to document the size and content of the discovery such that the resource(s) can be evaluated for significance under CEQA criteria. The research design shall list the sampling procedures appropriate to exhaust the research po tential of the tribal cultural resources in accordance with current professional archaeology standards. The treatment plan shall require monitoring by the appropriate Native American Tribe(s) during data recovery and shall require that all recovered artifacts undergo basic field analysis and documentation or laboratory analysis, whichever is appropriate. At the completion of the basic field analysis and documentation or laboratory analysis, any recovered tribal cultural resources shall be processed and cura ted according to current professional repository standards. The collections and associated records shall be donated to an appropriate curation facility, or, the artifacts may be delivered to the appropriate Native American Tribe(s) if that is recommended b y the City of Jurupa Valley. A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department, the Eastern Information Center, and the appropriate Native American Tribe.
DISPOSITION OF DISCOVERIES: In the event that Native American cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during the course of grading for this project. The following procedures will be carried out for treatment and disposition of the discoveries:
The landowner(s) shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods, and all archaeological artifacts and non-human remains as part of the required mitigation for impacts to tribal cultural resources. The applicant shall relinquish the artifacts through one or more of the following methods and provide the Jurupa Valley Planning Department with evidence of same:
a) A fully executed reburial agreement with the appropriate culturally affiliated Native Americ an tribes or bands. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all cataloguing and basic recordation have been completed.
b) A curation agreement with an appropria te qualified repository within Riverside County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and therefore would be professionally curated and made available to other archaeologists/researchers for further study. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within Riverside County, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. c) If more than one Native American Group is involved with the project and cannot come to an agreement as to the disposition of cultural materials, they shall be curated at the Western Science Center by default.
d) Should reburial of collected cultural items be preferred, it shall not occur until after the Phase IV monitoring report has been submitted to the Jurupa Valley Planning Department. Should curation be preferred, the developer/permit applicant is responsible for all costs and the repository and curation method shall be described in the Phase IV monitoring report.
MA 20117 – TTM37211M1
Previous Environmental Determination
December 19, 2022
11 Conclusion:
The project site is vacant, undeveloped land that remains substantially in the same physical condition as it was in 20 19 being subject to a continued variety of anthropogenic disturbances .
Based on the Interagency Development Review Process and the Plannin g Department Staff Report for MA2 0117, the minor changes to the conditions of approval would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures than those identified in the IS/MND. The effects associated with the minor changes to the condition of approval (COA) would be substantially the same as those reported for the approved IS/MND, and thus no Supplemental or Subsequent Environmental Review (IS/MND) is required.
ATTACHMENTS No. 2
Appeal Request for TTM37211M1
City of Jurupa Valley -1- Planning Agency Appeal Application Planning Department
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
P: (
951) 332-6464
F: (951) 332-6995
http://www.jurupavalley.org
APPEALING THE DECISION OF THE PLANING AGENCY:
Site Development Permit
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Design Review
Initial Plan Review
Modification
Tentative Tract Map
Revision to Approved Plan
Tentative Parcel Map
Time Extension
Zoning Clearance
Substantial Conformance
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Date Received: __________________
Received By: ____________________
Hearing Date: ______________ __
Case No(s): ____________________ _
Other action:
Project Address: ____________ ____ Assessor’s Parcel Number: _____-____-____ Zoning: _______________________ Lot Size:__________________ _______________________ General Plan Designation: ____________ Present Use of Property/Existing Improvements :
__________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Appellant’s Name:__________________________________________________________ Address:_______ TelephoneNumber:_______________Fax Number: ___________ City:__________________________ZipCode:___ Email:________________________ Contact Person: _________________ _________________________________________ Address:_______ TelephoneNumber:_______________Fax Number: ___________ City:__________________________ZipCode:___ Email:________________________ Property Owner’s Name:__________________________________________________________ Address:_______ TelephoneNumber:_______________Fax Number: ___________ City:__________________________ZipCode:___ Email:________________________ Explanation of the Appeal (What decision or part of a decision do you disagree with and why should the decision be overturned) :
ATTACHMENTS NO. 3
Adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-03
Section 5. Findings for Approval of Minor Change No. 1. No findings are required under the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to approve or deny a minor change to a previously approved tentative tract map.
(a) Approval of Master Application No. 20117. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 3721 l(TTM37211Ml) modifying Engineering Depaitment Condition of Approval No. 3.15 and denying modifications to Condition of Approval No.1.12, 2.15, and determine that no further CEQA review is required pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15162.
The recommended modifications to Condition No. 3.15 are attached as Exhibit A.
Section 6. Certification. The Community Development Director shall ce1tify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 22nd day of March 2023.
�z£_� �tz
Chair of Jurupa Valley Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Co opment Director/Secretary to the Planning Commission