Catalog No: G38MARB-36-3-02SB
Replaces: G38MARB-36-3-01SB
Performance
Btu/h
Btu/h
Btu/h
Btu/h
Btu/h
Btu/h
Btu/h
W/W
W/W
W/W
COP (47°F) 2.51
COP (17°F) 2.18
COP (5°F) 1.75
High Wall
Indoor Model DHMAHBQ36XA3
Construction View
Outdoor Model: 38MARBQ36AA3
Heating Rated Capacity (17°F) 22,400
Heating Maximum Capacity (17°F) 23,600
Heating Maximum Capacity (5°F) 20,400
Heating Cap. Range Min - Max 11,570~37,000
HSPF 9.0
Energy Star NO
Heating Rated Capacity (47°F) 36,000
Cooling Rated Capacity 36,000
Cooling Cap. Range Min - Max 9,300~38,800
EER 8.5
SEER 17.5
Copyright 2021 CAC/BDP ● Atlanta, GA. 30339
SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
Edition Date: 03/2021
Catalog No: G38MARB-36-3-02SB
Replaces: G38MARB-36-3-01SB
High Wall Heat Pump Ductless System
Indoor Model:
Job Data: Location:
Buyer: Buyer P.O. #: Carrier #:
Unit Number: Model Number:
Date:
36 Face Area Sq. Ft. 3.60
40MAHBQ36XA3 3
Voltage, Phase, Cycle V/Ph/Hz 208/230-1-60 20
7 MCA A. 0.625 Unit Width in (mm) 44.88 (1140)
Standard Unit Height in (mm) 14.57 (370)
Optional Unit Depth in (mm) 10.83 (275)
Cooling Indoor DB Min -Max °F(°C) 63~90 (17~32) Net Weight lbs (kg) 43.65 (19.8) Heating Indoor DB Min -Max °F(°C) 32~86 (0~30) 4
Pipe Connection Size - Liquid in (mm) 3/8 (9.52) Airflow (lowest to highest) CFM 382/506/639/843
Pipe Connection Size - Suction in (mm) 5/8 (16) Sound Pressure (lowest to highest) dB(A) 39/41/46/52
Air throw Data ft (m) 33.8 (10.3)
Moisture removal Pint/h (L/h 0.240 (0.115)
Field Drain Pipe Size O.D in (mm) 0.625 (16)
Performance may vary based on the outdoor unit matched to. See compatible outdoor units pages for Performance Data.
For Compatibility See Product Data
STANDARD FEATURES
• Modes: Cool, Heat, Dry, Fan, Auto
• Turbo Mode
• Four fan speeds
• Sleep Mode
• Relative Humidity Sensor
• Intelligent Eye (Occupancy Sensor)
• ECO Mode
• Up-Down Louver control (fixed or swing)
• Follow Me (senses temperature at handheld remote)
• Heating Setback (46° F Heating Mode)
• Quiet indoor operation
• Aluminum Golden Hydrophilic pre-coated fins
CONTROLS:
• Wireless Remote Controller included with indoor unit
• Wired Remote Controller KSACN0601AAA (7 Day
programmable) (Optional)
LIMITED WARRANTY*
• 10 year limited to original purchaser on compressor and parts upon timely registration, otherwise 5 years
*For residential applications. See warranty for full details.
Indoor
40MAHBQ36XA3
Submittal Data
Performance Data Certified By:
System Size
Indoor CoilIndoor Model No. Rows
Electrical
Fins per inch
Power Supply Indoor unit powered by outdoor unit Circuits Controls Wireless Remote Controller (°F/°C Convertible) Wired Remote Controller (°F/°C Convertible)
Operating
Range Number of Fan Speeds
Piping
Copyright 2021 Carrier Corporation ● Atlanta, GA. 30339
SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
Edition Date: 01/2021
Catalog No: SUB40MAHB-36-3-01
Replaces: NEW
Accessories
Unit Width in (mm)
Unit Height in (mm)
Unit Depth in (mm)
Net Weight lbs (kg)
KSACN0601AAA Wired Remote Control 7 day Programmable*
KSAIF0601AAA Wi-Fi™ Kit High Wall Mid-Tier
KSAIC0301230
10.83 (275)
24V Interface Kit 230V
43.65 (19.8)
Construction View
Indoor Model: 40MAHBQ36XA3
44.88 (1140)
14.57 (370)
Copyright 2021 Carrier Corporation ● Atlanta, GA. 30339
SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
Edition Date: 01/2021
Catalog No: SUB40MAHB-36-3-01
Replaces: NEW
Copyright 2021 CAC/BDP ● Atlanta, GA 30339 Edition Date: 02/2021 Catalog No: SUB-KSACN0801AAA-01 Manufacturer reserves the right to change, at any time, specifications and designs without notice and without obligations. Replaces: NEW 1 Wired Remote Controller
7 Day Programmable
Model: KSACN0801AAA
Submittal Data
Job Data: __________________________________________________________ Location: ________________________________________________ B
uyer: _____________________________________ Buyer P.O. #: ______________________________ Carrier #: _____________________________ U
nit Number: ________________________________________ Model Number: __________________________________________________________ P
erformance Data Certified By: ________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________ Features
• LCD Display
• °F/°C Convertible
• Backlight display
• Follow Me default, temperature sensing on the controller • 4-wire quick connect
• Room temperature display
• Troubleshooting error code display
• Infrared IR receiver built-in
• Clock
• 12 HR format (am/pm)
Functions
• Weekly Schedule 7 day programmable
• Mode: Auto-Cool-Dry-Heat-Fan
• Operation Mode Locking
– CH Heat Pump
– CC Cooling Only
– HH Heating Only
– NA No Auto Mode
• Fan Speed: Auto/Low/Med/High speed
• Set temperature range limit
• Airflow direction Horizontal and Vertical (on some models) • Temperature Setting
• Child LockParts included
o Wired Remote Controller
o Installation and owner’s
manual
o Screws M4X20 & M4X25
o Wall Plugs
o Plastic Screw Bars
o Battery
o Connection Cable 19 ft (6m)
Accessories, Sold Separately
o Additional extension cable 19 ft (6m) available through Replacement Components. Part Number: 17401204011789 Compatibility
High Wall Ductless Units. Refer to the compatibility charts for specific model numbers.
C_) · V A
. DAYOFF ,- TIMER .
' . NC ,'
8 Copyright 2021 CAC/BDP ● Atlanta, GA 30339 Edition Date: 02/2021 Catalog No: SUB-KSACN0801AAA-01 Manufacturer reserves the right to change, at any time, specifications and designs without notice and without obligations. Replaces: NEW 2 Specifications
Input Voltage DC 12V
Ambient Temperature 23 ~ 110°F (-5 - 43°C)
Ambient Humidity 40%RH ~ 90%RH
Wiring Specification
Wiring Type Size Maximum Length
Sheathed vinyl cord or cable 16 – 18AWG (0.75 – 1.25mm2) 164ft (50m) Construction View
Wiring
----E
E
0 N .----
----C
r--
<:::t"
4.7in. (120mm) 0.7c in (20mm)
'
'
4-wire quick connect
•.·.~ .~; . '-: A .
@ . S' :i .'
' i 1M~ -', .,·co;,,( '
..__::._&~ .·
----E
C:
O"I .---....__.,
1./')
----r---
E o
E
<:::!'"
co
----C
("I')
("I')
.
-----
Connection Cable
IT I
---------(;
530-w
- -
1.8in (46mm) - . -
2.4in (60mm)
Mainboard
----E
E
<:::!'"
<:::!'"
----C
r---
.----
SUBMITTALProject
Jurupa Valley - Operations CenterDate
Wednesday, March 29, 2023
Table Of Contents
Project: Jurupa Valley - Operations Center04/27/2023
Prepared By:
25SCA536A003
3Unit Report
4Performance Summary
5System Parameters
5Electrical Data
5Certified Drawing
6 Residential Carrier Products Bldr 1.37Page 2 of 8
25SCA536A003
Project: Jurupa Valley - Operations Center04/27/2023
Prepared By:
25SCA536A003
25SCA536A003Submittal Cover SheetUnit ReportPerformance Summary ReportCertified Drawings Residential Carrier Products Bldr 1.37Page 3 of 8
Unit Report For 25SCA536A003
Project: Jurupa Valley - Operations Center04/27/2023
Prepared By:
Unit Report
Outdoor Unit Parameters Unit Model:
25SCA Unit Size:
3 Tons (Size 36) Voltage:
208/230-1-60V-Ph-Hz
Indoor Coil Parameters Unit Model:
FJ4D Unit Size:
36,000 Btuh (Size 36) Cabinet Width:
TXV/ 17 Inches Cabinet Voltage:
208-1-60V-Ph-Hz Heating Size:
No HeatOutdoor Unit Dimensions and Weight Unit Length:
31.1875in Unit Width:
31.1875in Unit Height:
28.6875in Unit Shipping Weight:
208.lb
Indoor Coil Dimensions and Weight Unit Length:
22.0625in Unit Width:
17.625in Unit Height:
49.625in Unit Shipping Weight:
148.lbRESIDENTIAL APPLICATIONSThis warranty is to the original purchasing owner and subsequent owners only to the extent and as stated in the Warranty Conditions and below. The limited warranty period in years, depending on the part and the claimant, is as shown in the table below.
Limited Warranty (Years)
Item
Original Owner
Subsequent Owner
Parts
10* (or 5)
5 Compressor
10* (or 5)
5 *If properly registered within 90 days of original installation, otherwise 5 years (except in California and Quebec and other jurisdictions that prohibit warranty benefits conditioned on registration). See Warranty Conditions below.OTHER APPLICATIONSThe warranty period is five (5) years on the compressor, and one (1) year on all other parts. The warranty is the original owner only and is not available for subsequent owners.
Ordering Information
Part Number
Description
Quantity
Outdoor Unit
25SCA536A003
25SCA Comfort Single Stage Heat Pump with Puron Refrigerant 3 Tons Cooling 1 15 SEER @ ARI Conditions
Indoor Coil
FJ4DNXB36L00
FJ4D Base Series Fan Coil with Puron 36000 BTU Cooling 208/230-1-60 1 TXV/ 17 Inches Cabinet
Aluminum
The Product and Ratings Data in this program is subject to change at any time and without notice. Please refer to the latest product literature and the AHRI directory at www.ahridirectory.org for the most up-to-date information.
Residential Carrier Products Bldr 1.37Page 4 of 8
Performance Summary For 25SCA536A003
Project: Jurupa Valley - Operations Center04/27/2023
Prepared By:
Performance Summary
System PerformanceSystem:
25SCA/FJ4D System Quantity:
1 Altitude:
0.0ft Linear Pipe Length:
0.0ft COP @ 47 F:
3.70 COP @ 17 F:
2.54 SEER2 @ ARI Conditions:
14.3 EER2 @ ARI Conditions:
12.0 HSPF2 @ ARI Conditions:
7.5 Actual Clg Airflow:
1200.0CFM Standard Clg Airflow:
1200.0CFM Total Net Clg Capacity:
34.73MBH Net Sensible Clg Capacity:
26.33MBH Htg HP Capacity:
34.47MBH Htg HP Integrated Capacity:
34.47MBH Total System Power:
2.89kW
System Parameters
System ParametersOutdoor Unit Parameters Unit Model:
25SCA536A003 Unit Size (Nominal):
3 Tons (Size 36) Voltage:
208/230-1-60V-Ph-Hz Clg Ent Air DB Ambient:
95.0°F Htg Ent Air DB Ambient:
47.0°F
Indoor Coil Parameters Unit Model:
FJ4DNXB36L00 Unit Size (Nominal):
36,000 Btuh (Size 36) Voltage:
208-1-60V-Ph-Hz Ent Air DB:
80.00°F Ent Air WB:
67.00°F Ent Enthalpy:
31.44BTU/lb Lvg Air DB:
59.68°F Lvg Air WB:
57.96°F Lvg Enthalpy:
25.01BTU/lb Htg Ent Air DB:
70.0°F Htg Lvg Air DB:
96.6°F Heating Size (Nominal):
No Heat Total External Static Pressure:
0.50in wg
Electrical Data
Electrical DataOutdoor Electrical Data Unit Voltage:
208/230-1-60V-Ph-Hz Fan Motor FLA:
1.20Amps MCA:
20.3Amps Max Fuse:
30Amps Operating Range Min:
197V Operating Range Max:
253V Compressor RLA:
15.3Amps Compressor LRA:
83.1Amps
Indoor Electrical Data: (For units with no factory installed electric heaters) Unit Voltage:
208-1-60V-Ph-Hz Unit FLA:
4.2Amps Unit MCA:
5.3Amps Unit MOCP:
15.0Amps Unit Min Wire Size:
14.0 Unit Fuse/Ckt Bkr Amps:
15.0Amps Motor HP:
1/2HP Notice: Indoor Elect. data is for 208-1-60 voltage The Product and Ratings Data in this program is subject to change at any time and without notice. Please refer to the latest product literature and the AHRI directory at www.ahridirectory.org for the most up-to-date information.
Residential Carrier Products Bldr 1.37Page 5 of 8
Certified Drawing For 25SCA536A003
Project: Jurupa Valley - Operations Center04/27/2023
Prepared By:
Certified Drawing
Outdoor Model Unit Model:
25SCA Unit Size:
3 Tons (Size 36) Voltage:
208/230-1-60V-Ph-Hz SEER:
15 PartNumber:
25SCA536A003
Shipping Dimensions and Weights
Outdoor Unit
Height
34.00 in
Width
34.25 in
Length
34.25 in
Operating Weight
178. lb
Shipping Weight
208. lb
Dimensions
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
31.19 in
28.69 in
0.75 in
6.56 in
24.70 in
9.13 in
1.10 in
3.81 in
14.00 in
14.50 in
14.50 inThe Product and Ratings Data in this program is subject to change at any time and without notice. Please refer to the latest product literature and the AHRI directory at www.ahridirectory.org for the most up-to-date information. Residential Carrier Products Bldr 1.37 Page 6 of 8 Certified Drawing For 25SCA536A003
Project: Jurupa Valley - Operations Center04/27/2023
Prepared By:
Indoor Coil Unit Model:
FJ4D Unit Size:
36,000 Btuh (Size 36) Voltage:
208-1-60V-Ph-Hz Cabinet Insulation:
TXV/ 17 Inches Cabinet PartNumber:
FJ4DNXB36L00
Dimensions and Weights
Indoor Coil
Height
49.63 in
Width
17.63 in
Length
22.06 in
Shipping Weight
148. lb
Dimensions
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
J
49.63 in
17.63 in
15.75 in
15.63 in
15.38 in
23.13 in
23.63 in
--
-- The Product and Ratings Data in this program is subject to change at any time and without notice. Please refer to the latest product literature and the AHRI directory at www.ahridirectory.org for the most up-to-date information.
Residential Carrier Products Bldr 1.37 Page 7 of 8
Certified Drawing For 25SCA536A003
Project: Jurupa Valley - Operations Center04/27/2023
Prepared By:
Indoor Coil Unit Model:
FJ4D Unit Size:
36,000 Btuh (Size 36) Voltage:
208-1-60V-Ph-Hz PartNumber:
FJ4DNXB36L00
The Product and Ratings Data in this program is subject to change at any time and without notice. Please refer to the latest product literature and the AHRI directory at www.ahridirectory.org for the most up-to-date information.
Residential Carrier Products Bldr 1.37 Page 8 of 8
Date: Weight: (US) (Metric) Part Number:
RTU:
Submitted to: Approved by: Notes:
This Document Is The Property Of MicroMetl Corporation And Is Delivered Upon The Express Condition That The Contents Will Not Be Disclosed Or Used Without MicroMetl’s Written Consent.
MicroMetl Reserves The Right To Discontinue, Or Change At Any Time, Specifications & Designs Without Any Notice Incurring Obligations.
Master Revision:
Page Revision:
Indianapolis_3035 N. Shadeland Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46226_800.MMC.HVAC •• Sparks_905 Southern Way, Sparks, NV 89431_800.884.4MMC •• Longview_201 Kodak Blvd., Longview, TX 75602_903.248.4800 A B-I.D. CFM
500 1000 1500 2000
43lbs
19.5kg
MB-GP10CB-D00B
Mixing Box - CUBE - 1000 -1500 CFM, Ultra Low Leak Genesis No Controls - No Controller, No Sensor, Belimo Actuator, Galvanized Metal With Gears Comprised of Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT) Flame Retardant 30% Glass Filled , Barometric Relief NOT Included. Field Fabrication of a Transition May Be Required. Dampers are convertible and can be relocated to the desired orientation.
16.50 12.00
0002A
0002A
0.050
0.080
0.180
0.600
Date: Weight: (US) (Metric) Part Number:
RTU:
Submitted to: Approved by: Notes:
This Document Is The Property Of MicroMetl Corporation And Is Delivered Upon The Express Condition That The Contents Will Not Be Disclosed Or Used Without MicroMetl’s Written Consent.
MicroMetl Reserves The Right To Discontinue, Or Change At Any Time, Specifications & Designs Without Any Notice Incurring Obligations.
Master Revision
Page Revision
Indianapolis_3035 N. Shadeland Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46226_800.MMC.HVAC •• Sparks_905 Southern Way, Sparks, NV 89431_800.884.4MMC •• Longview_201 Kodak Blvd., Longview, TX 75602_903.248.4800 188lbs
85.28kg
ECE-PRCCECB-D00B
Economizer - Economizer - Genesis Ultra Low Leak Economizer, Horizontal Orientation, Actuator Only for 3rd Party Economizer Controls - No Controller, No Sensor, Belimo Actuator. Painted Rain Hood With Aluminum Filter, Barometric Relief, All Necessary Panels And Hardware Included. 0001A
0001A
Date: Weight: (US) (Metric) Part Number:
RTU:
Submitted to: Approved by: Notes:
This Document Is The Property Of MicroMetl Corporation And Is Delivered Upon The Express Condition That The Contents Will Not Be Disclosed Or Used Without MicroMetl’s Written Consent.
MicroMetl Reserves The Right To Discontinue, Or Change At Any Time, Specifications & Designs Without Any Notice Incurring Obligations.
Master Revision
Page Revision
Indianapolis_3035 N. Shadeland Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46226_800.MMC.HVAC •• Sparks_905 Southern Way, Sparks, NV 89431_800.884.4MMC •• Longview_201 Kodak Blvd., Longview, TX 75602_903.248.4800 188lbs
85.28kg
ECE-PRCCECB-D00B
Economizer - Economizer - Genesis Ultra Low Leak Economizer, Horizontal Orientation, Actuator Only for 3rd Party Economizer Controls - No Controller, No Sensor, Belimo Actuator. Painted Rain Hood With Aluminum Filter, Barometric Relief, All Necessary Panels And Hardware Included. 0001A
0001A
SIL-500 HM
* Chubb provides error and omission insurance to Silfab Solar Inc.
SILFABSOLAR.COM
ENGINEERED FOR COMMERCIAL
& UTILITY PROJECTS
Superior performance and proven reliability from a
trusted source.
Unparalleled coverage for all your commercial projects
with our industry-leading 25-year product and 30-year
linear performance warranty.
SILFAB SOLAR INC.
800 Cornwall Ave
Bellingham WA 98225 USA
T +1 360.569.4733
[email protected]
SILFABSOLAR.COM
1770 Port Drive
Burlington WA 98233 USA
T +1 360.569.4733
240 Courtneypark Drive East
Mississauga ON L5T 2Y3 Canada
T +1 905.255.2501
F +1 905.696.0267
Silfab - SIL-500-HM-20220715
No reproduction of any kind is allowed without
permission. Data and information is subject to
modifications without notice. © Silfab Solar Inc.,
2022. Silfab Solar® is a registered trademark of
Silfab Solar Inc.
44.6" [1133mm]
2.4" [60mm]
15.7" [399mm]51.18" 1300mm]15.7" [399mm]
8" [200mm]
43.03" [1093mm]
Ø0.17" [Ø4.2mm] (x2)
Grounding Hole
Mounting Hole (x4)
Drainage (x8)
53.15"[1350mm]
82.6" [2098mm]
1.4" [35mm]
1.4" [35mm]
1.4" [35mm]
0.06" [1.5mm]
0.5" [12mm]
0.3" [7mm]
0.6" [15mm]
Profile
SideBack View
WARRANTIES
Module product workmanship warranty 25 years**
Linear power performance guarantee 30 years
≥ 97.1% end 1st yr
≥ 91.6% end 12th yr
≥ 85.1% end 25th yr
≥ 82.6% end 30th yr
TEMPERATURE RATINGS
Temperature Coefficient Isc +0.064 %/°C
Temperature Coefficient Voc -0.28 %/°C
Temperature Coefficient Pmax -0.36 %/°C
NOCT (± 2°C) 45 °C
Operating temperature -40/+85 °C
SHIPPING SPECS
Modules Per Pallet: 29 or 29 (California)
Pallets Per Truck 24 or 23 (California)
Modules Per Truck 696 or 667 (California)
CERTIFICATIONS
Product
UL 61215-1:2017 Ed.1***, UL 61215-2:2017 Ed.1***, UL 61730-1:2017 Ed.1***, UL 61730- 2:2017 Ed.1 ***, CSA C22.2#61730-1:2019 Ed.2***, CSA C22.2#61730-2:2019 Ed.2***, IEC 61215-1:2016 Ed.1***, IEC 61215-2:2016 Ed.1***, IEC 61730-1:2016 Ed.2***, IEC 61730-2:2016 Ed.2***, IEC 61701:2020 (Salt Mist Corrosion), IEC 62716:2013 (Ammonia Corrosion), CEC Listing***, UL Fire Rating: Type 1
Factory ISO9001:2015
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES / COMPONENTS METRIC IMPERIAL
Module weight 26.2kg ± 0.2kg 57.8lbs ± 0.4lbs
Dimensions (H x L x D) 2098 mm x 1133 mm x 35 mm 82.6 in x 44.6 in x 1.37 in Maximum surface load (wind/snow)* 2400 Pa rear load / 5400 Pa front load 50.1 lb/ft2 rear load / 112.8 lb/ft2 front load Hail impact resistance ø 25 mm at 83 km/h ø 1 in at 51.6 mph Cells 132 Half cells - Si mono PERC
10 busbar - 182 mm x 91 mm
132 Half cells- Si mono PERC
10 busbar - 3.58 x 7.16 in
Glass 3.2 mm high transmittance, tempered,
DSM antireflective coating
0.126 in high transmittance, tempered,
DSM antireflective coating
Cables and connectors (refer to installation manual) 1350 mm, ø 5.7 mm, EVO2 from Staubli 53.15 in, ø 0.22 in (12AWG), EVO2 from Staubli Backsheet High durability, superior hydrolysis and UV resistance, multi-layer dielectric film, fluorine-free PV white backsheet
Frame Anodized Aluminum (Silver)
Bypass diodes 3 diodes - GF5045 (45V max DC blocking voltage, 50A max forward rectified current) Junction Box UL 3730 Certified, IEC 62790 Certified, IP68 rated * Warning. Read the Safety and Installation Manual for mounting specifications and before handling, installing and operating modules. ** 12 year extendable to 25 years subject to registration and conditions outlined under “Warranty” at silfabsolar.com PAN files generated from 3rd party performance data are available for download at: silfabsolar.com/downloads *** Certification and CEC listing in progress.
ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS 500 HM
Test Conditions STC NOCT
Module Power (Pmax) Wp 500 369
Maximum power voltage (Vpmax) V 38.80 35.69
Maximum power current (Ipmax) A 12.89 10.34
Open circuit voltage (Voc) V 45.78 42.11
Short circuit current (Isc) A 13.48 10.82
Module efficiency % 21.0% 19.4%
Maximum system voltage (VDC) V 1500
Series fuse rating A 25
Power Tolerance Wp 0 to +10
Measurement conditions: STC 1000 W/m² • AM 1.5 • Temperature 25 °C • NOCT 800 W/m² • AM 1.5 • Measurement uncertainty ≤ 3% Sun simulator calibration reference modules from Fraunhofer Institute. Electrical characteristics may vary by ±5% and power by 0 to +10W.
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att F
ATTACHMENT F
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE PROVISIONS
INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Climatec LLC shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors i n the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees” in this Section 23) from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoeve r (except as noted in section 10), including reasonable fees of accountants, attorneys and other professionals, and all reasonable costs associated therewith (collectively “Claims”), whether actual, alleged or threatened which arise out of, pertain to or r elate to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of, or breach of this Agreement by, Climatec LLC and/or its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employee s (or any entity or individual for whom Climatec LLC shall bear legal liability) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. Climatec LLC shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Claims with c ounsel of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses, including all reasonable attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Climatec LLC shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal reasonable expenses and costs incurred by the Indemnitees in connection therewith.
For Claims arising out of “design professional services”, and in accordance with Civil Code § 2782.8(a), in no event shall the cost to defend the Indemnitees that is charged to Climatec LLC, exceed Climatec LLC’s proportionate percentage of fault.
INSURANCE
Without limiting Climatec LLC’s indemnification of the City, and prior to commencement of Work, Climatec LLC shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and, in a form, satisfactory to City.
At a minimum, Climatec LLC must submit the following documents prior to commencement of work:
• Certificate(s) of insurance (COI) evidencing the insurance coverage(s) required below.
• COI(s) shall include:
o CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley CA 92509
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att F
o DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS /
VEHICLES
Description: [insert description]
• General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement(s) as required by the Additional insured status section below.
• Workers’ Compensation Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement or Waiver of Right to Recover Against Others endorsement in favor of the City.
General liability insurance. Climatec LLC shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 0 1, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. An umbrella insurance policy may be used to satisfy the required limits of insurance.
Climatec LLC shall submit to the City along with the certificate of insurance, an Additional Insured Endorsement to the Climatec LLC’s general liability insurance policy including the City of Jurupa Valley, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.
Automobile liability insurance. Climatec LLC shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Climatec LLC arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non- owned or rente d vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
Climatec LLC shall submit to the City along with the certificate of insurance, an Additional Insured Endorsement to the Climatec LLC’s automobile liability policy in cluding the City of Jurupa Valley, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.
Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Climatec LLC shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Climatec LLC agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
Workers’ compensation insurance. Climatec LLC shall maintain Workers’ Compensat ion Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000). Section 3700 of the Labor Code In addition, Climatec LLC shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Em ployer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Section 3700 for all of the subcontractor’s employees.
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att F
Climatec LLC shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City of Jurupa Valley, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
Umbrella or excess liability insurance Climatec LLC shall obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with a $9 million limit that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth above, including commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason;
• Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; and • Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.
Climatec LLC’s pollution liability insurance. Coverage shall provide for liability arising out of sudden, accidental, and gradual pollution, and remediation. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. All activities contemplated in this agreement shall be specifically scheduled on the policy as “covered operations.” The policy shall provide coverage for remediation of the site in the event of an environmental contamination event arising out of the materials, supplies, products, work, operations, or workmanship.
Installation Floater. Climatec LLC shall obtain an Installation Floater for the value of the property and covering the portion of the work to be constructed, installed, altered, or repaired by Contractor.
The Installation Floater policy must include coverage for the fixtures, materials, supplies, machinery and equipment used in or incidental to the construction project as well as property kept off-site or while in transit. Coverage must also include property of others in the Contractor’s care, custody, or control. In addition to Contractor, the Agency and all subcontractors shall be named as Insureds on the policy with coverage extending through the final completion date.
OTHER PROVISIONS OR REQUIREMENTS
Proof of insurance. Climatec LLC shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a general liability additional insured endorsement(s) and a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certificates of insurance, additional insured endorsement(s) and waivers of subrogation shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this contract.
Duration of coverage. Climatec LLC shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att F
connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by Climatec LLC, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Climatec LLC shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be re quired to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non- contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
Products/completed operations coverage. Products/completed operations coverage shall extend a minimum of five (5) years after project completion. Coverage shall be included on behalf of the insured for covered claims arising out of the actions of independent contractors. If the insured is using subcontractors, the Policy must include work performed “by or on behalf” of the insured. Policy shall contain no language that would invalidate or remove the insurer’s duty to defend or indemnify for claims or suits expressly excluded from coverage. Policy shall specifically provide for a duty to defend on the part of the insurer. The City, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, shall be included as additional insureds under the Products and Completed Operations coverage.
City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Climatec LLC or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Climatec LLC payments.
In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage, except for professional liability, maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Climatec LLC or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Climatec LLC hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.
Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). Climatec LLC acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Climatec LLC of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att F
Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a g iven coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Climatec LLC maintains highe r limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Climatec LLC. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
Notice of cancellation. Climatec LLC agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide the Agency with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. If any of the Climatec LLC’s insurers are unwilling to provide such notice, then Climatec LLC shall have the responsibility of notifying the Agency immediately in the event of Climatec LLC’s f ailure to renew any of the required insurance coverages, or insurer’s cancellation or non-renewal.
Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.
Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.
Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Cl imatec LLC’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy (ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
Pass through clause. Climatec LLC agrees to ensure that its subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Climatec LLC, provide adequate insurance coverage with endorsements required of Climatec LLC. Climatec LLC agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Climatec LLC agrees that upon request, all agreements with Climatec LLCs, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.
City’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Climatec LLC ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in additional cost to the Climatec LLC, the City and Climatec LLC shall renegotiate Climatec LLC’s compensation.
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att F
Self-insured retentions. Any self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible.
Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City.
Timely notice of claims. Climatec LLC shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Climatec LLC’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.
Defense Costs. General liability and Auto liability insurance policies shall pay for defense costs.
Additional insurance. Climatec LLC shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att G
ATTACHMENT G
PAYMENT BOND AND PERFORMANCE BOND
TEMPLATES
Bond No. __________
PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that:
WHEREAS the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”), has awarded to
(“Principal”)
(Name and address of Contractor)
a contract (the “Contract”) for the Work described as follows:
(Project name)
WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the Contract to furnish a Bond for the faithful performance of the Contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and
,
(Name and address of Surety)
(“Surety”) a duly admitted surety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as S
urety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the penal sum of
Dollars ($ ), this amount being not less than
the total Contract Price, in lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if the hereby bounded Principal, his, her or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, provisions, and warranties in the Contract and any alteration thereof made as
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att G
therein provided, on the Principal’s part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. Surety hereby waives any statute of limitations as it applies to an action on this Bond.
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or of the Work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations under this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the Work or to the specifications. Surety hereby waives the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 2845 and 2849. The City is the principal beneficiary of this Bond and has all rights of a party hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two (2) identical counterparts of this instrument, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original hereof, have been duly executed by Principal and Surety, on the date set forth below, the name of each corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative(s) pursuant to authority of its governing body.
Dated:
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att G
“Principal”
By:
Its
By:
Its
(Seal)
“Surety”
By:
Its
By:
Its
(Seal)
Note: This Bond must be executed in duplicate and dated, all signatures must be notarized, and evidence of the authority of any person signing as attorney-in-fact must be attached. DATE OF BOND MUST NOT BE BEFORE DATE OF CONTRACT. Surety companies executing Bonds must appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the State of California.
Bond No. __________
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att G
PAYMENT BOND
(LABOR AND MATERIALS)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that:
WHEREAS the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”), State of California, has awarded to
(“Principal”)
(Name and address of Contractor)
a contract (the “Contract”) for the Work described as follows:
(Project name)
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Contract, the Principal is required before entering upon the performance of the Work, to file a good and sufficient payment Bond with the City to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and
(Name and address of Surety)
(“Surety”) a duly admitted sur ety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material suppliers, and other persons employed in the performance of the Contract and referred to in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code in the penal sum of
Dollars ($ ), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to this Work or labor, that the Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this Bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing this obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this Bond.
Upon expiration of the time within which the California Labor Commissioner may serve a civil wage and penalty assessment against the principal, any of its subcontractors, or both the principal and its subcontractors pursuant to Labor Code Section 1741, and upon
City of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att G
expiration of the time within which a joint labor management committee may commence an action against the principal, any of its subcontractors, or both the principal and its subcontractors pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.2, if the condition of this Bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two (2) identical counterparts of this instrument, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original hereof, have been duly executed by Principal and Surety, on the date set forth below, the name of each corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative(s) pursuant to authority of its governing body.
Dated:
“Principal”
By:
Its
By:
Its
(Seal)
“Surety”
By:
Its
By:
Its
(Seal)
Ci
ty of Jurupa Valley
Installation Agreement – Att G
Note: This Bond must be executed in duplicate and dated, all signatures must be notarized, and evidence of the authority of any person signing as attorney-in-fact must be attached. DATE OF BOND MUST NOT BE BEFORE DATE OF CONTRACT. Surety companies executing Bonds must appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the State of California.
C i t y o f J u r u p a V a l l e y
Installation Agreement – Att H
Attachment “H”
Analysis
Cost of the Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program $2,690,327 Total Utility Reduction $2,880,015
Year Total Projected Utility Usage Without Implementing the Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program
Total Projected Utility Usage After Implementing the
Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program
1 $152,338 $99,159
2 $160,868 $104,182
3 $169,889 $109,460
4 $179,429 $115,005
5 $189,519 $120,830
6 $200,790 $126,950
7 $212,769 $133,380
8 $225,502 $140,135
9 $239,039 $147,232
10 $253,434 $154,688
11 $271,382 $163,167
12 $290,809 $172,112
13 $311,850 $181,551
14 $334,659 $191,511
15 $359,403 $202,020
16 $386,264 $264,303
17 $415,447 $279,495
18 $447,175 $295,584
19 $481,694 $312,621
20 $519,276 $330,665
21 $560,223 $502,071
22 $604,865 $543,958
23 $653,568 $589,776
24 $706,738 $639,924
25 $764,819 $694,840
26 $828,307 $755,012
27 $897,746 $820,979
28 $973,740 $893,336
29 $1,056,955 $972,742
30 $1,148,129 $1,059,927
TOTAL $13,996,628 $11,116,613
Note: The "Base Case" is the projected utility cost in the absence of implementing any aspect of the subject energy service contract. The "Proposed Case" is the projected utility cost after implementing the subject energy service contract. In "Both Cases", utility usage is escalated at 5% annually. In the "Base Case", projected utility usage is escalated at an additional 2% for Years 1-5, 3% for Years 6-10 and 6% for Years 11-20, to account for continuing degradation of the building automation systems (BAS) and HVAC systems, associated with equipment age. The "Proposed Case" degradation is accounted for as follows:
degradation for the BAS and HVAC systems is 1% for Years 11-15 and 2% for Years 16-20. Solar PV degradation factor is 0.25% per year, for Years 2-30.
Utility Savings Summary for the City of Jurupa Valley
Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program
Analysis
7/6/2023
ALL INCLUDED CONTENTS PRODUCED BY CLIMATEC ARE AGREED TO BE PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL AND NOT TO BE SHARED WITH ANY NON-CITY PERSONNEL
New
BAS
New High
Efficiency
HVAC Units
Retrofit
Existing HVAC
Units
Interior
LED
Modernization
Exterior
LED
Modernization
Occupancy
Sensors/
Dimming
Control
Solar
PV
Emergency
Back-up
Generator
Electric
Vehicle (EV)
Charging
Stations
Electrical
Service
Upgrades
City Hall 12 1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Eddie D. Smith Senior Center ✓ 6 ✓ ✓ ✓
Operations Center ✓ 6 2 ✓ ✓ ✓
Pat Merritt Dog Park &
Street Lighting ✓ ✓
7/6/2023
ALL INCLUDED CONTENTS PRODUCED BY CLIMATEC ARE AGREED TO BE PROPRIETARY AND
CONFIDENTIAL AND NOT TO BE SHARED WITH ANY NON -CITY PERSONNEL
City Hall
July 6, 2023
HVAC
− High efficiency HVAC modernizations at 3 sites
− Retrofit existing HVAC units at 2 sites
− Ventilation & filtration improvements
BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM (BAS) − New BAS at 2 sites
LIGHTING
− Interior LED lighting modernizations at 3 sites
− Exterior LED lighting modernizations at 4 sites
− Occupancy sensors/ dimming controls at 4 sites
SOLAR & RENEWABLES
− Solar parking structure at City Hall
− Emergency back-up generator at City Hall
− Electric vehicle (EV) charging stations at City Hall
ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE − Electrical service upgraded & upsized at City Hall TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATIONS $ 2,690,327 LIFECYCLE SAVINGS Energy savings will exceed total project amount per Gov’t Code 4217 FUNDING SOURCES − American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds
Cost of the Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program $2,690,327 Total Utility Reduction $2,880,015
Year Total Projected Utility Usage Without Implementing the Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program
Total Projected Utility Usage After Implementing the
Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program
1 $152,338 $99,159
2 $160,868 $104,182
3 $169,889 $109,460
4 $179,429 $115,005
5 $189,519 $120,830
6 $200,790 $126,950
7 $212,769 $133,380
8 $225,502 $140,135
9 $239,039 $147,232
10 $253,434 $154,688
11 $271,382 $163,167
12 $290,809 $172,112
13 $311,850 $181,551
14 $334,659 $191,511
15 $359,403 $202,020
16 $386,264 $264,303
17 $415,447 $279,495
18 $447,175 $295,584
19 $481,694 $312,621
20 $519,276 $330,665
21 $560,223 $502,071
22 $604,865 $543,958
23 $653,568 $589,776
24 $706,738 $639,924
25 $764,819 $694,840
26 $828,307 $755,012
27 $897,746 $820,979
28 $973,740 $893,336
29 $1,056,955 $972,742
30 $1,148,129 $1,059,927
TOTAL $13,996,628 $11,116,613
Note: The "Base Case" is the projected utility cost in the absence of implementing any aspect of the subject energy service contract. The "Proposed Case" is the projected utility cost after implementing the subject energy service contract. In "Both Cases", utility usage is escalated at 5% annually. In the "Base Case", projected utility usage is escalated at an additional 2% for Years 1-5, 3% for Years 6-10 and 6% for Years 11-20, to account for continuing degradation of the building automation systems (BAS) and HVAC systems, associated with equipment age. The "Proposed Case" degradation is accounted for as follows:
degradation for the BAS and HVAC systems is 1% for Years 11-15 and 2% for Years 16-20. Solar PV degradation factor is 0.25% per year, for Years 2-30.
Utility Savings Summary for the City of Jurupa Valley
Energy Infrastructure Modernization Program
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 6, 2023
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.C
PUBL
IC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE
DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON
ALL LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN FOR JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1
CONSOLIDATED (JV L&LMD NO. 89 -1-C) - CITYWIDE AND
APPROVAL OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
RECO
MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council open the public hearing and accept testimony, if any; and 2) That
the City Council continue the public hearing to the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting on July 20, 2023.
BAC
KGROUND
U
pon incorporation on July 1, 2011, the City of Jurupa Valley assumed the responsibility for certain L&LMD No. 89-1- C zones now within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. As such, the City is now responsible for the services and charges provided by L&LMD No. 89-1-C zones within its boundaries.
O
n February 4, 2016, the City adopted Resolution 2016- 01, which clarified the City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- C (JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C) is separate and distinct from the County of Riverside Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- C. JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C maintains and services 77 locations throughout the City of Jurupa Valley. The District contains 47 landscaping assessment zones and 21 street lighting assessment zones as described in Attachment A. The annual levy of assessments on the parcels within the boundaries of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is consistent with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
ANALYSIS
On June 15, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023- 47 ordering the preparation of the Engineer’s Report and Resolution No. 2023- 48 declaring the City’s intent to levy and collect assessments within specified zones.
Consistent with the City Council’s direction regarding compliance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the aforementioned resolutions set a public hearing scheduled for 7 :00 p.m. on Ju ly 6, 2023 to receive testimony for and against the proposed assessments.
Staff is requesting that the City Council continue the public hearing to the next regularly scheduled meeting on July 20, 2023.
Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69 are not yet maintained and assessed. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor Controller’s Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected. Zone P, Zone W, Zone Y, Zone DD, Zone EE, Zone FF, Zone II and Street lighting Zone 2-G are expected to start maintenance in Fiscal Year 2023-2024.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The annual budget for fiscal year 2023-24 totals $2,168,682.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action. This would mean that the City of Jurupa Valley could not continue collecting assessments to pay for maintenance of improvements in these specific rights-of-way and would need to discontinue (a) the maintenance of landscaping, trails, fencing, and irrigation services to these areas, in certain zones, ( b) maintaining the fossil filters in certain zones as required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and (c) paying Edison for street light energy costs in certain zones.
2. Provide staff with further direction.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEER’S REPORT VOLUME 1
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF AND II.
June 2023
PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
600 B
Street, Suite 2000
San Diego, CA 92101
619
-
236
-
1778
www.weareharris.com
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of Assessment Engineer ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 1 Backround ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .3 Part I – Plans and Specifications ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .4 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 B. ASSESSMENT UNITS: .................................................................................................................................................. 5 C. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES .................................................................................................... 5 D. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS PER ZONE ........................................................................................................... 6 E. MAINTENANCE PLANS ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Part II – Method of Apportionment ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 13 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 SPECIAL BENEFIT ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 GENERAL BENEFIT ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 16 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE ............................................................................................................................................... 16 Part IV – Assessment Diagrams ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 17 Part V – Assessment Rolls ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...........1
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
PROJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) – CITYWIDE
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023–2024
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,
DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) was prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum
The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:
Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Sec tion 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and article of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
2 I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.
Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications
2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.
3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside Count y Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Zones 4,5, 6,7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that w ill benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.
5. As of the date of this report, there is one parcel within Zone 4 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Valley.
Parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Number 163-042-043 is the location of Jurupa Valley City Hall. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots do not benefit from the maintained improvements.
6. As of the date of this report, there is three parcels within Zone 16 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Valley. Parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Numbers 181052017, 181052018, and 181052004 correspond to the location of Jurupa Valley Operation Center. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots do not benefit from the maintained improvements.
In conclusion,
DATED this 7th day of June, 2023.
Alison M. Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Riverside
State of California
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Backround
This combined Annual Engineer’s Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all annual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.
The 1972 Act provides for the annual lev y of assessments for the Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C, for the express purpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing of the following:
• Landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation; Statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures;
• Public lighting facilities, including traffic signals; • Appurtenant facilities necessary for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including walls, sidewalks, and removal of debris; and
• Maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing, including the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments for an ass essment district after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provisions in Proposition 218.
The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. Th is resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.
The Report prepared by the engineer must include maintenance plans for the improvements. The Report must also include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District, and an assessment of the estimat ed costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots which benefit from the improvements. Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved.
Once the Report i s completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
4 improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.
In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners of the assessed parcels must approve any new or increased assessments. Zones included in this Report have been previously approved by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.
Part I – Plans and Specifications
A. INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Assessment Zone means the zones which include landscaping, water quality, streetlighting and other co mbinations of improvements. Street lighting Zone means a zone that only includes streetlighting improvements which includes streetlights and traffic signals.
There are 77 locations within the District: 47 separate assessment zones with 56 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 21 street lighting assessment zones with 21 locations.
There are 59 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (17) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consists of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F , Z, DD and Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on seven (7) locations within the District on Fiscal Year 2023-2024; these locations are in Assessment District Zone G, P, W, Y, EE, FF, II and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 68 existing Zones (77 locations). New or pending Zones will be presented to the City Council under separate reports.
Total number of Zones/Locations: 68 (77 locations)
Assessment Zones: 47 (56 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 21 (21 locations)
Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 55 within 47 Assessment Zones Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Locations (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 21 – within 15 Assessment Zones.
The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:
Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
5 Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G.
B. ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, Z, DD, II; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.
Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, EE, FF; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F
EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.
Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Locations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zone 137, Zone 17 3, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone F, Zone G, Zone I, Zone K, Zone L, Zone M, Zone N, Zone O, Zone P, Zone R, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone W, Zone X, Zone Y and Zone Z; and Street Lighting Zone 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 15, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, Street Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, Street Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2 -A, Street Lighting Zone 2 -B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, Street Lighting Zone 2-E, Street Lighting Zone 2-F and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements not yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, and Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
C. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities (also referred herein to as “streetlighting" or “traffic signals” ), and appurtenant facilities, including walls (also referred herein to as “fencing”), sidewalks (also referred herein to as “multi purpose trail”), and debris removal facilities (also referred herein to as “bio-swales” or “fossil filters”) are located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, spraying, fertilizing, or treatment for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
6 Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel , power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.
D. Description of Improvements per Zone
Zone 4:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 4 generally includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fence, dog park, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Zone 5:
Maintenance of impr ovements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Zone 6:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 6 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue
Zone 7:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
7 Etiwanda Avenue Van Buren Boulevard
Zone 9:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 9 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Country Village Road Philadelphia Avenue Zone 14:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 14 generally includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Armstrong Road Sierra Avenue
Zone 16:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 16 generally includes landscaping, streetlight, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Crestmore Road Mission Boulevard
Zone 17:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 17 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Etiwanda Avenue Iberia Street
Zone 21:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 21 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:
Castlerock Road Galena Street Rutile Street Zone 34:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 34 generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Lakeside Drive
Zone 61:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 61 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Cydney Circle Halbrook Ter
Zone 73:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 73 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Viaggio Circle
Zone 78:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 78 generally includes fossil filter and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
65th Street Limonite Avenue Pats Ranch Road Zone 95:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 95 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
54th Street
Zone 102:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 102 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Armstrong Road
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
8 Zone 106:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 106 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Country Village Road
Zone 126:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 126 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Harrell Street
Zone 128:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 128 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Granite Hill Drive
Zone 132:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 132 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20TH Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 137:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 137 generally includes fossil filter, streetlight, and , traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bain Street Bellegrave Avenue Birtcher Drive Zone 141:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 141 generally includes landscaping, bio -swale, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
A Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 142:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 142 general ly includes landscaping, multi -purpose trail, fencing, fossil filter, traffic signal, and future bio-swale and graffiti abatement improvements within public right-of-ways of:
63rd Street Limonite Ave. Lucretia Ave. Wineville Rd.
Zone 173:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 173 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Caden Way/Project Driveway Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road I-15 on/off ramp Wineville Road
Zone 182:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 182 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Wineville Road Mission Boulevard
Zone A:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone A generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Limonite Avenue Median
Zone C:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone C generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
9 Limonite Avenue Felspar Street
Zone E:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone E generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue El Rivino Road
Zone F:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone F generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Pedley Road Golondrina Street
Zone G:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone G generally includes landscaping improvements within public right- of-ways of:
Avalon Street 36th Street
Zone I:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone I generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue Etiwanda Avenue
Zone K:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone K generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Jurupa Road Pyrite Street
Zone L:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone L generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard 42nd Street
Zone M:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone M generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Riverside Drive Etiwanda Avenue
Zone N:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone N generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard 26th Street
Zone O:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone O generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Avlis Lane Viaggio Circle
Zone P:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone P generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Ben Nevis Road Pedley Street
Zone S:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone S generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Pats Ranch Road 68th Street
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
10 Zone T:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone T generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone U:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone U generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard Avalon Street
Zone W
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone W generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within the public right-of-ways of:
Hudson Street 59th St 60th Street White Willow Lane Black Thorn Street Zone X
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone X generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Etiwanda Avenue Parkhurst Street Zone Y:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone Y generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue Market Street 24th Street
Zone Z:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone Z generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard El Rivino Road Hall Street Zone DD:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone DD generally includes landscaping (median and parkway) improvements and capital improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue Agua Mansa Road
Zone EE:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone EE generally includes landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Van Buren Boulevard
Zone FF:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone FF generally includes landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Mission Boulevard Brotchie Lane Hobbs Court Agate Street
Zone II:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone II generally includes landscaping (median and parkway), streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Mission Boulevard Pyrite Street
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
11 E. MAINTENANCE PLANS
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are voluminous and are not bound in this Report but by this reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection. Copies are available in the office of the Riverside County Transportation Department, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. See the list below for plan numbers. Reduced maps of the maintained improvements are filled in Part IV of this Report; see Assessment Diagrams.
The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:
ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone A GP14-020/IP14-007
Zone C GP16-025/IP16-012
Zone E GP16-043/IP16-019
Zone F GP16-040/IP16-016
Zone G GP17-025/IP17-006
Zone I LD17-569/IP17-010
Zone K LD18-229/IP13-006
Zone L LD17-351/IP17-003
Zone M LD18-642/IP18-008
Zone N LD19-162/IP18-011
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
12 Zone O GP17-034/IP16-001
Zone P Zone P/IP19-005
Zone S Zone S/IP19-006
Zone T Zone T/IP20-009
Zone U Zone U/IP21-001
Zone W
Zone X Zone X/IP19-008
Zone Y
Zone Z Zone Z/IP21-002
Zone DD
Zone EE
Zone FF
Zone II
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
13 PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Part II – Method of Apportionment
INTRODUCTION
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district ma y be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.
In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Constitution (“Article”) requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property withinthe district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilitiesprovides direct and special benefit to those properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).
Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.
In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the District by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
14 located throughout the properties within the District. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign right -ofways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.
Landscaping, Ornamental Structures, and Appurtenant Facilties
The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets.
Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping , graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the District. This provides a positive visual experience and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the District.
Public Lighting Facilities
Streets provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District.
Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, a nd comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility. Provision of a well lit roadway prevents damage to properties in the district from traffic accidents from poor visibility at night. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District.
Traffic signal assessments are based on traffic studies and/or trip counts. For specific zone benefits, see Part III Estimate of Costs and Expenses.
Summary
Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties, are apportioned on a per acre, per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), or per parcel basis.
Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government-owned easements, utility easements, or flood channel parcels. Government-owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedest rian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not receive any benefi t from landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties and are not assessed.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
15 Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; • The installation or construction of statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities; • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not limited to, traffic signals; • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks o r paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and;
• The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.
GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties maintenance costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from other City Funds. Because the landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities, and appurtenant facilties improvements are located immediately adjacent to properties within the District and are maintained solely for the benefit of the properties within the District, any benefit received by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit. As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.
However, some traffic signal improvements provide general and specific benefit. It was previously determined that the costs and expenses for the traffic signal improvements are less than the County’s total maintenance cost. Percentages of the County’s total maintenance costs were previously determined from budgets at the time of annexation by Riverside County Transportation Department. These percentages are noted on the applicable Fiscal Year 20 23–2024 budgets for those Zones with traffic signal improvements in Part III, Estimate of Costs and Expenses. Therefore, only the costs directly related to the specific benefit of the traffic signal improvements will be assessed to the applicable Zones.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
16 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES
Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses
INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.
The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire fiscal year (2023-2024), including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.
The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.
The inflation factor, for those zones with an inflation factor in place, may increase budgets for Zones, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed. However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.
Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 173, may be subject to an annual adjustment of two percent and the maximum assessment for Zones 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for All Items or the CPI-U for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario County CaliforniaStandard Metropolitan Statistical area or, as implemented on Decembe r 2017, Riverside -San Bernardino-Ontario
Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The annual CPI-U for All Items or CPI -U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI-U for All Items, or CPI-U for Electricity annual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property ow ners within each of the benefit zones in the District.
BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained during fiscal year 20 23-2024 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditures, CPI-U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:
1. LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone dated 05/19/2023; CFDLLMD 22-23 YEAR END
ESTIMATES
The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 were prepared for this report:
(See next page)
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected NO. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence $126,292.57 6483.36 $19.48
Water $153,334.87 6483.36 $23.65
Backflow Certification $478.67 6483.36 $0.07
Tree Trimming $30,803.07 6483.36 $4.75
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $13,522.35 6483.36 $2.09
Electricity $19,042.79 6483.36 $2.94
Field Inspection/Management $40,175.15 6483.36 $6.20
Repair and Replacement $23,454.83 6483.36 $3.62
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $407,104.30 Cost Per EDU $62.79 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $35,796.62 6483.36 $5.52
Contingency $42,113.68 6483.36 $6.50
Total Incidental Costs $77,910.30 Cost Per EDU $12.02
Total Projected Costs $485,014.60 Cost Per EDU $74.81
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $234,293.42
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$36.14
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$234,293.42
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$36.14
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($250,721.18)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 4 (68-1536)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 12,182.67 1409 $8.65
Water 4,172.60 1409 $2.96
Backflow Certification 24.43 1409 $0.02
Tree Trimming 21,658.06 1409 $15.37
Field Inspection/Management 4,423.94 1409 $3.14
Repair and Replacement 2,418.45 1409 $1.72
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $44,880.15 Cost Per Parcel $31.85 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $3,814.81 1409 $2.71
Contingency $4,488.01 1409 $3.19
Total Incidental Costs $8,302.82 Cost Per Parcel $5.89
Total Projected Costs $53,182.97 Cost Per Parcel $37.75 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $79,338.15
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$56.30
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$79,338.15
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$56.30
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $26,155.18
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $128,632.69 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $26,155.18
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$154,787.87
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 5 (68-1537)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence 4,106.53 30 $136.88
Water 935.11 30 $31.17
Backflow Certification 229.40 30 $7.65
Electricity 604.08 30 $20.14
Field Inspection/Management 667.26 30 $22.24
Repair and Replacement 1,501.03 30 $50.03
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $8,043.41 Cost Per Parcel $268.11 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $722.48 30 $24.08
Contingency $849.97 30 $28.33
Total Incidental Costs $1,572.45 Cost Per Parcel $52.42 Total Projected Costs $9,615.86 Cost Per Parcel $320.53 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $7,732.68
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$257.75
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$7,732.68
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$257.75
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($1,883.18)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,294.45
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,294.45
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 6 (68-1538)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 7 (68-1539)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acres
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 4,426.73 2095.48 $2.11 Water 2,980.41 2095.48 $1.42
Backflow Certification 58.45 2095.48 $0.03
Tree Trimming 1,907.40 2095.48 $0.91
Monument Lighting 164.02 2095.48 $0.08
Electricity 1,005.71 2095.48 $0.48
Field Inspection/Management 936.20 2095.48 $0.45
Repair and Replacement 649.36 2095.48 $0.31
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $12,128.28 Cost Per Acres $5.79 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acres
Administrative Costs $1,030.90 2095.48 $0.49
Contingency $1,212.83 2095.48 $0.58
Total Incidental Costs $2,243.73 Cost Per Acres $1.07
Total Projected Costs $14,372.01 Cost Per Acres $6.86
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $11,799.35
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5.63
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$11,799.35
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $5.63
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($2,572.66)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,477.80
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,477.80
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcels
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 16,545.20 493 $33.56
Water 2,819.91 493 $5.72
Tree Trimming 1,144.44 493 $2.32
Electricity 1,896.40 493 $3.85
Repair and Replacement 851.60 493 $1.73
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $23,257.55 Cost Per Parcels $47.18 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcels
Administrative Costs $1,879.62 493 $3.81
Contingency $2,211.31 493 $4.49
Capital Improvements $2,467.08 493 $5.00
Total Incidental Costs $6,558.01 Cost Per Parcels $13.30 Total Projected Costs $29,815.56 Cost Per Parcels $60.48 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $24,317.69
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$49.33
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$24,317.69
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$49.33
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($5,497.87)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,689.32
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,689.32
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 2 Maximum Annual Assessment was escalated by 2%
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 9 (68-1540)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 38,207.22 1228.98 $31.09 Water 23,886.17 1228.98 $19.44
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 261.43 1228.98 $0.21 Backflow Certification 180.73 1228.98 $0.15
Tree Trimming 14,858.36 1228.98 $12.09
Trash Receptacles 963.93 1228.98 $0.78
Electricity 2,648.24 1228.98 $2.15
Field Inspection/Management 9,363.18 1228.98 $7.62
Repair and Replacement 4,879.88 1228.98 $3.97
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $95,249.14 Cost Per EDU $77.50 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $7,110.76 1228.98 $5.79
Contingency $8,365.60 1228.98 $6.81
Capital Improvements $4,535.08 1228.98 $3.69
Total Incidental Costs $20,011.44 Cost Per EDU $16.28
Total Projected Costs $115,260.58 Cost Per EDU $93.79
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $94,613.78
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$76.98
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$94,613.78
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $76.98
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($20,646.80)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 14 (68-1541)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected NO. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 113,186.57 5254.32 $21.54 Water 27,323.66 5254.32 $5.20
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 261.43 5254.32 $0.05 Backflow Certification 62.25 5254.32 $0.01
Tree Trimming 18,751.70 5254.32 $3.57
Trash Receptacles 1,307.25 5254.32 $0.25
Electricity
(Including: Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen
HPSV, Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen,
Monument Lighting) 86,081.40 5254.32 $16.38
Field Inspection/Management 30,680.15 5254.32 $5.84
Repair and Replacement 4,855.48 5254.32 $0.92
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $282,509.89 Cost Per EDU $53.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $23,641.42 5254.32 $4.50
Contingency $23,641.42 5254.32 $4.50
Capital Improvements $23,641.42 5254.32 $4.50
Total Incidental Costs $70,924.26 Cost Per EDU $13.50
Total Projected Costs $353,434.15 Cost Per EDU $67.27
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $409,833.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$78.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$353,434.15
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $67.27
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $277,199.16 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$277,199.16
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 16 (68-1542)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acres
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 6,146.54 24.42 $251.70 Water 2,309.00 24.42 $94.55
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 261.43 24.42 $10.71
Backflow Certification 942.89 24.42 $38.61
Electricity 172.32 24.42 $7.06
Field Inspection/Management 943.47 24.42 $38.64
Repair and Replacement 366.00 24.42 $14.99
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,141.65 Cost Per Acres $456.25 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acres
Administrative Costs $947.04 24.42 $38.78
Contingency $1,114.16 24.42 $45.62
Capital Improvements $2,599.12 24.42 $106.43
Total Incidental Costs $4,660.32 Cost Per Acres $190.84 Total Projected Costs $15,801.97 Cost Per Acres $647.09 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $17,649.17
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$722.74
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$15,801.97
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$647.09
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $44,595.89
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$44,595.89
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 17 (68-1543)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 20,493.45 166 $123.45 Water 5,360.36 166 $32.29
Backflow Certification 132.96 166 $0.80
Tree Trimming 207.01 166 $1.25
Electricity 353.24 166 $2.13
Field Inspection/Management 2,888.42 166 $17.40
Repair and Replacement 1,568.55 166 $9.45
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $31,003.99 Cost Per Parcel $186.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $2,635.34 166 $15.88
Contingency $3,100.40 166 $18.68
Capital Improvements $3,248.90 166 $19.57
Total Incidental Costs $8,984.64 Cost Per Parcel $54.12 Total Projected Costs $39,988.63 Cost Per Parcel $240.90 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $41,104.44
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$247.62
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$39,988.63
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$240.90
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $103,450.62 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$103,450.62
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 21 (68-1544)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 34 (68-1545)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 6,263.22 118 $53.08
Water 1,372.27 118 $11.63
Backflow Certification 52.29 118 $0.44
Tree Trimming 3,979.93 118 $33.73
Electricity 172.79 118 $1.46
Field Inspection/Management 920.22 118 $7.80
Repair and Replacement 57.51 118 $0.49
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $12,818.23 Cost Per Parcel $108.63 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $1,089.55 118 $9.23
Contingency $1,281.82 118 $10.86
Capital Improvements $3,248.90 118 $27.53
Total Incidental Costs $5,620.27 Cost Per Parcel $47.63 Total Projected Costs $18,438.50 Cost Per Parcel $156.26 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $13,692.39
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$116.04
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$13,692.39
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$116.04
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($4,746.11)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $23,448.57
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$23,448.57
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 192.10 31 $6.20
Field Inspection/Management 58.87 31 $1.90
Repair and Replacement 371.44 31 $11.98
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $622.41 Cost Per Parcel $20.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $52.90 31 $1.71
Contingency $62.24 31 $2.01
Capital Improvements $522.85 31 $16.87
Total Incidental Costs $637.99 Cost Per Parcel $20.58
Total Projected Costs $1,260.41 Cost Per Parcel $40.66
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $3,313.13
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$106.87
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,313.13
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$106.87
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $2,052.72
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $13,253.11
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $2,052.72
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$15,305.83
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 61 (68-1546)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 179.44 14 $12.82
Field Inspection/Management 358.88 14 $25.63
Repair and Replacement 58.87 14 $4.21
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $597.19 Cost Per Parcel $42.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $50.76 14 $3.63
Contingency $59.72 14 $4.27
Total Incidental Costs $110.48 Cost Per Parcel $7.89
Total Projected Costs $707.67 Cost Per Parcel $50.55
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $1,988.40
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$142.03
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$707.67
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$50.55
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,280.73
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $3,590.92
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,280.73
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$4,871.65
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 73 (68-1547)
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7386 -Pats Ranch/Limonite 2,769.68 41.35 $66.98 Traffic Signal #7399 -Pats Ranch/64th 11,078.70 41.35 $267.93 Traffic Signal #7400 -Pats Ranch/65th 11,078.70 41.35 $267.93 Fossil Filters 768.38 41.35 $18.58
Field Inspection/Management 1,486.15 41.35 $35.94
Repair and Replacement 247.31 41.35 $5.98
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $27,428.92 Cost Per Acre $663.34 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $2,331.46 41.35 $56.38
Contingency $2,742.89 41.35 $66.33
Capital Improvements $3,248.90 41.35 $78.57
Total Incidental Costs $8,323.25 Cost Per Acre $201.29
Total Projected Costs $35,752.17 Cost Per Acre $864.62
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $27,015.00
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $653.32
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $27,015.00
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $653.32
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($8,737.17)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $176,760.54 PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $176,760.54
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 78 (68-1548)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7386 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500).
Traffic Signal s #7399 and #7400 were assessed at 100% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signals are 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 78 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 193.84 19 $10.20
Field Inspection/Management 15.72 19 $0.83
Repair and Replacement 19.64 19 $1.03
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $229.20 Cost Per Parcel $12.06 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $19.48 19 $1.03
Contingency $22.92 19 $1.21
Capital Improvements $941.13 19 $49.53
Total Incidental Costs $983.53 Cost Per Parcel $51.76
Total Projected Costs $1,212.73 Cost Per Parcel $63.83
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $2,479.03
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$130.47
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,479.03
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$130.47
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,266.30
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $5,462.20
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,266.30
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$6,728.50
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 95
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 95 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters 725.61 26 $27.91
Field Inspection/Management 74.21 26 $2.85
Repair and Replacement 59.36 26 $2.28
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $859.18 Cost Per Parcel $33.05 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $73.03 26 $2.81
Contingency $85.91 26 $3.30
Total Incidental Costs $158.94 Cost Per Parcel $6.11
Total Projected Costs $1,018.12 Cost Per Parcel $39.16
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $6,783.02
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$260.89
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,783.02
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$260.89
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 102
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 102 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected NO. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7358 - Country Village/Vesada10,846.20 18.24 $594.64 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 330.51 18.24 $18.12
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,176.71 Cost Per Acre $612.76 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $58.66 18.24 $3.22
Contingency $69.02 18.24 $3.78
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $1,568.55 18.24 $86.00 Total Incidental Costs $1,696.23 Cost Per Acre $93.00
Total Projected Costs $12,872.94 Cost Per Acre $705.75
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $8,154.37
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$447.06
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,154.37
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$447.06
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($4,718.57)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $56,230.54
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$56,230.54
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 106 (68-1551)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7358 was assessed at 75% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 106 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Fossil Filters $89.72 130.53 $0.69
Field Inspection/Management $179.44 130.53 $1.37
Repair and Replacement $29.91 130.53 $0.23
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $299.07 Cost Per Acre $2.29 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $89.72 130.53 $0.69
Contingency $179.44 130.53 $1.37
Capital Improvements $29.91 130.53 $0.23
Total Incidental Costs $299.07 Cost Per Acre $2.29
Total Projected Costs $598.14 Cost Per Acre $4.58
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $1,635.24
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$12.53
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,635.24
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $12.53
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,037.10
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,871.97
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,037.10
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$11,909.07
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 126 (68-1552)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Fossil Filters $222.73 192.00 $1.16
Field Inspection/Management $22.57 192.00 $0.12
Repair and Replacement $18.06 192.00 $0.09
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $263.36 Cost Per Parcel $1.37 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $22.39 192.00 $0.12
Contingency $26.34 192.00 $0.14
Total Incidental Costs $48.73 Cost Per Parcel $0.25
Total Projected Costs $312.09 Cost Per Parcel $1.63
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $6,546.14
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34.09
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,546.14
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34.09
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $6,234.05
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.08
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $6,234.05
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$6,234.13
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 128
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 128 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 All costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7389 - Rubidoux/20th/Market$2,549.06 1.40 $1,820.76 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $811.91 1.40 $579.94
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $3,360.97 Cost Per Acre $2,400.69 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $271.16 1.40 $193.69
Contingency $319.01 1.40 $227.86
Total Incidental Costs $590.17 Cost Per Acre $421.55
Total Projected Costs $3,951.14 Cost Per Acre $2,822.24 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $3,142.57
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,244.69
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,142.57
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,244.69
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($808.57)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $23,928.69
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$23,928.69
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 132 (68-1554)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7389 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 132 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #7338 - Bellegrave/Bain $3,894.74 32.61 $119.43 Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $2,058.59 32.61 $63.13 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $1,073.42 32.61 $32.92
Fossil Filters $1,152.02 32.61 $35.33
Field Inspection/Management $575.14 32.61 $17.64
Repair and Replacement $230.05 32.61 $7.05
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $8,983.96 Cost Per Acre $275.50 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $733.28 32.61 $22.49
Contingency $862.68 32.61 $26.45
Capital Improvements $1,568.55 32.61 $48.10
Total Incidental Costs $3,164.51 Cost Per Acre $97.04
Total Projected Costs $12,148.47 Cost Per Acre $372.54
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $12,140.59
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$372.30
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$12,140.59
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$372.30
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($7.88)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $52,660.86
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$52,660.86
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE 137 (68-1555)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Traffic Signal #7338 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 137 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $3,450.81 9.95 $346.82 Water $1,725.41 9.95 $173.41
Backflow Certification $57.51 9.95 $5.78
Tree Trimming $805.19 9.95 $80.92
Bio-swales $172.54 9.95 $17.34
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $1,215.05 9.95 $122.12
Electricity $187.74 9.95 $18.87
Field Inspection/Management $19.48 9.95 $1.96
Repair and Replacement $115.03 9.95 $11.56
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $7,748.76 Cost Per Acre $778.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $652.58 9.95 $65.59
Contingency $767.74 9.95 $77.16
Total Incidental Costs $1,420.32 Cost Per Acre $142.75
Total Projected Costs $9,169.08 Cost Per Acre $921.52
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $17,253.26
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,734.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,169.08
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$921.52
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $31,766.57
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$31,766.57
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023.
ZONE 141
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Zone 141 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 EDUS EDU
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $25,881.08 80 $323.51 Water $6,638.76 80 $82.98
Backflow Certification $230.05 80 $2.88
Tree Trimming $10,352.43 80 $129.41
Traffic Signal #1152 - Limonite/Wineville $1,019.62 80 $12.75 Fossil Filters $222.96 80 $2.79
Field Inspection/Management $1,030.16 80 $12.88
Repair and Replacement $575.14 80 $7.19
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $45,950.20 Cost Per EDU $574.38 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost EDUS EDU
Administrative Costs $3,901.36 80 $48.77
Contingency $4,589.84 80 $57.37
Total Incidental Costs $8,491.20 Cost Per EDU $106.14
Total Projected Costs $54,441.40 Cost Per EDU $680.52
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $26,473.47
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $330.92
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $26,473.47
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $330.92
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($27,967.93)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Traffic Signal #1152 was assessed at 10% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 142 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection Zone 142 also includes future parkway landscaping, bio-swales, fossil filters, traffic signal (#1505), and graffiti abatement (Phase 1& 2), which when completed may increase the per EDU assessment by $498.40, adjusted for inflation. At FY this amount would be $660.97, which when added to the current $290.38 would be a total of $951.35. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
Zone 142 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
ZONE 142
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Traffic Signal #4572 - CantuGalleano/I-15 $525.20 9.60 $54.71 Traffic Signal #7348 - CantuGalleano/Caden$1,067.87 9.60 $111.24 Traffic Signal #7350 - CantuGalleano/Wineville$1,067.87 9.60 $111.24 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $1,292.36 9.60 $134.62
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $3,953.30 Cost Per Acre $411.80 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $336.03 9.60 $35.00
Contingency $395.33 9.60 $41.18
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $510.00 9.60 $53.13
Total Incidental Costs $1,241.36 Cost Per Acre $129.31
Total Projected Costs $5,194.66 Cost Per Acre $541.11
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $4,244.28
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$442.11
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$4,244.28
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$442.11
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($950.38)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $54,548.77
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$54,548.77
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity.
ZONE 173 (68-1558)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Traffic Signal - Wineville/Mission $8,174.06 3 $2,724.69 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen $4,882.62 3 $1,627.54
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $13,056.68 Cost Per Parcel $4,352.23 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $1,053.41 3 $351.14
Contingency $1,239.30 3 $413.10
Total Incidental Costs $2,292.71 Cost Per Parcel $764.24 Total Projected Costs $15,349.39 Cost Per Parcel $5,116.46 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $9,635.01
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,211.67
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,635.01
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,211.67
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($5,714.38)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $54,548.77
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$54,548.77
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE 182 (68-1559)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $2,726.14 1 $2,726.14 Mulch $522.64 1 $522.64
Water $1,564.37 1 $1,564.37
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $287.57 1 $287.57
Backflow Certification $104.57 1 $104.57
Tree Trimming $2,270.15 1 $2,270.15
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 1 $230.05
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $483.32 1 $483.32 Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $549.96 1 $549.96 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $8,738.77 Cost Per Parcel $8,738.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $87.83 1 $87.83
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $654.96 1 $654.96
Contingency - Landscaping $770.54 1 $770.54
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $103.33 1 $103.33
Total Incidental Costs $1,616.66 Cost Per Parcel $1,616.66 Total Projected Costs $10,355.43 Cost Per Parcel $10,355.43 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $9,992.15
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,992.15
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,992.15
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,992.15
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($363.28)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,720.25
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,720.25
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate.
Utility Provider: SCE
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE A (68-0023)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park $2,865.75 4 $716.44
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $3,329.08 4 $832.27
Mulch $346.79 4 $86.70
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $297.92 4 $74.48
Backflow Certification $59.58 4 $14.90
Tree Trimming $238.34 4 $59.59
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $148.70 4 $37.18 Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $504.90 4 $126.23 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $7,791.06 Cost Per Parcel $1,947.77 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $53.63 4 $13.41
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $585.60 4 $146.40
Contingency - Landscaping $688.94 4 $172.24
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $63.09 4 $15.77
Total Incidental Costs $1,391.26 Cost Per Parcel $347.82 Total Projected Costs $9,182.32 Cost Per Parcel $2,295.58 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $9,193.03
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,298.26
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$9,182.32
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,295.58
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $10.71
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,131.61
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,131.61
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023.
Zone C is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
ZONE C (68-9959)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $6,132.36 1 $6,132.36
Mulch $575.14 1 $575.14
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $52.29 1 $52.29
Tree Trimming $309.09 1 $309.09
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $7,330.31 Cost Per Parcel $7,330.31 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $623.08 1 $623.08
Contingency $733.03 1 $733.03
Total Incidental Costs $1,356.11 Cost Per Parcel $1,356.11 Total Projected Costs $8,686.42 Cost Per Parcel $8,686.42 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $8,098.66
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,098.66
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,098.66
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$8,098.66
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($587.76)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $2,948.54
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$2,948.54
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE E (68-0174)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance4 $4,888.02 6 $814.67
Mulch $399.91 6 $66.65
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 6 $43.57
Backflow Certification $57.51 6 $9.59
Tree Trimming $532.62 6 $88.77
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $382.38 6 $63.73
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $6,521.87 Cost Per Parcel $1,086.98 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $31.39 6 $5.23
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $526.70 6 $87.78
Contingency - Landscaping $619.66 6 $103.28
Total Incidental Costs $1,177.75 Cost Per Parcel $196.29 Total Projected Costs $7,699.62 Cost Per Parcel $1,283.27 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $7,752.82
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,292.14
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$7,699.62
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,283.27
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,131.61
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,131.61
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE F (68-0175)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance4 $11,440.13 24 $476.67
Mulch $1,041.30 24 $43.39
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 24 $10.89
Backflow Certification $57.51 24 $2.40
Tree Trimming $1,757.73 24 $73.24
Monument Lighting $595.84 24 $24.83
Water Quality Basin $5,958.40 24 $248.27
Fertilizer Injector $262.17 24 $10.92
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $489.90 24 $20.41 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $21,864.41 Cost Per Parcel $911.02 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $41.66 24 $1.74
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $1,820.10 24 $75.84
Contingency - Landscaping $2,141.31 24 $89.22
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $49.02 24 $2.04
Ad Valorem Reduction -$7.65 24 -$0.32
Total Incidental Costs $4,044.44 Cost Per Parcel $168.52 Total Projected Costs $25,908.85 Cost Per Parcel $1,079.54 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $25,947.77
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,081.16
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$25,908.85
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,079.54
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. Zone G was NYM in prior year. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE G (68-9957)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance4 $4,071.96 2 $2,035.98
Mulch $147.68 2 $73.84
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 2 $130.72
Backflow Certification $52.29 2 $26.15
Tree Trimming $268.51 2 $134.26
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 2 $115.03
Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $433.40 2 $216.70 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $5,465.32 Cost Per Parcel $2,732.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $36.84 2 $18.42
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $427.71 2 $213.86
Contingency - Landscaping $530.14 2 $265.07
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $43.34 2 $21.67
Total Incidental Costs $1,038.03 Cost Per Parcel $519.02 Total Projected Costs $6,503.35 Cost Per Parcel $3,251.68 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $2,945.42
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,472.71
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,945.42
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,472.71
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($3,557.93)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 4 Water meter and water cost included on landscape rate. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE I (68-9960)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $5,511.16 25 $220.45
Mulch $574.08 25 $22.96
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 25 $10.46
Backflow Certification $57.51 25 $2.30
Tree Trimming $1,141.99 25 $45.68
Water Quality Basin $6,172.90 25 $246.92
Fertilizer Injector $271.61 25 $10.86
Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED $1,484.18 25 $59.37 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $15,474.86 Cost Per Parcel $618.99 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $126.16 25 $5.05
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $1,191.43 25 $47.66
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $140.18 25 $5.61
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $148.42 25 $5.94
Ad Valorem RPARCELction -$13.79 25 -$0.55
Total Incidental Costs $1,592.40 Cost Per Parcel $63.70 Total Projected Costs $17,067.26 Cost Per Parcel $682.69 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $18,065.72
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$722.63
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$17,067.26
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$682.69
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $685.60
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$685.60
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE K (68-9961)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $6,077.57 4 $1,519.39
Water $1,859.02 4 $464.76
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 4 $65.36
Backflow Certification $115.03 4 $28.76
Tree Trimming $1,072.51 4 $268.13
Fertilizer Injector $524.33 4 $131.08
Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED $256.50 4 $64.13 Electricity $357.50 4 $89.38
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $10,523.89 Cost Per Parcel $2,630.97 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $21.80 4 $5.45
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $874.96 4 $218.74
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,029.36 4 $257.34
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $25.65 4 $6.41
Total Incidental Costs $1,951.77 Cost Per Parcel $487.94 Total Projected Costs $12,475.66 Cost Per Parcel $3,118.93 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $12,402.50
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,100.63
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$12,402.50
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,100.63
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($73.16)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $5,841.57
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$5,841.57
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE L (68-9962)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $7,150.08 1 $7,150.08
Mulch $744.80 1 $744.80
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $57.51 1 $57.51
Tree Trimming $268.13 1 $268.13
Streetlights LS-1 150 W 9500 Lumen LED $558.20 1 $558.20 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $9,040.15 Cost Per Parcel $9,040.15 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $47.45 1 $47.45
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $723.19 1 $723.19
Contingency $850.81 1 $850.81
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $55.82 1 $55.82
Total Incidental Costs $1,677.27 Cost Per Parcel $1,677.27 Total Projected Costs $10,717.42 Cost Per Parcel $10,717.42 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $10,724.65
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$10,724.65
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$10,717.42
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$10,717.42
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $6,724.23
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$6,724.23
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE M (68-0234)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $2,937.25 2 $1,468.63
Mulch $208.40 2 $104.20
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 2 $130.72
Backflow Certification $57.51 2 $28.76
Tree Trimming $536.26 2 $268.13
Streetlights LS-1 22 W 9500 Lumen LED $254.99 2 $127.50 Streetlights LS-1 84 W 9500 Lumen LED $130.42 2 $65.21
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $4,386.26 Cost Per Parcel $2,193.13 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $32.75 2 $16.38
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $342.30 2 $171.15
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $402.70 2 $201.35
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $38.54 2 $19.27
Total Incidental Costs $816.29 Cost Per Parcel $408.15
Total Projected Costs $5,202.55 Cost Per Parcel $2,601.28 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $5,219.56
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,609.78
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,202.55
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,601.28
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $7,565.85
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$7,565.85
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE N (68-0235)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $1,716.01 10 $171.60
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 10 $26.14
Backflow Certification $57.51 10 $5.75
Tree Trimming $268.13 10 $26.81
Streetlights LS-1 39 W 9500 Lumen LED $423.28 10 $42.33 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $2,726.36 Cost Per Parcel $272.64 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $35.98 10 $3.60
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $197.98 10 $19.80
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $232.92 10 $23.29
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $42.33 10 $4.23
Total Incidental Costs $509.21 Cost Per Parcel $50.92
Total Projected Costs $3,235.57 Cost Per Parcel $323.56 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $3,250.96
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$325.10
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,235.57
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$323.56
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $4,220.08
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$4,220.08
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE O (68-0236)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $14,007.53 4 $3,501.88
Mulch $1,459.12 4 $364.78
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 4 $65.36
Backflow Certification $52.29 4 $13.07
Tree Trimming $1,202.56 4 $300.64
Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED $830.27 4 $207.57
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $17,813.20 Cost Per Parcel $4,453.30 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $70.57 4 $17.64
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $1,443.65 4 $360.91
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,698.29 4 $424.57
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $83.02 4 $20.76
Total Incidental Costs $3,295.53 Cost Per Parcel $823.88 Total Projected Costs $21,108.73 Cost Per Parcel $5,277.18 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $21,060.40
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,265.10
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$21,060.40
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,265.10
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($48.33)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023. Zone P was NYM in previous year. 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE P (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $3,180.50 3 $1,060.17
Mulch $331.28 3 $110.43
Water Meter $67.87 3 $22.62
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 3 $87.14
Backflow Certification $57.51 3 $19.17
Tree Trimming $258.81 3 $86.27
Streetlights LS-1 82 W 9500 Lumen LED $305.39 3 $101.80 Electricity $363.56 3 $121.19
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $4,826.35 Cost Per Parcel $1,608.78 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $26.66 3 $8.89
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $385.34 3 $128.45
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $453.21 3 $151.07
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $30.30 3 $10.10
Total Incidental Costs $895.51 Cost Per Parcel $298.50
Total Projected Costs1 $5,721.86 Cost Per Parcel $1,907.29 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $5,751.35
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,917.12
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$5,721.86
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,907.29
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $651.17
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$651.17
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE S (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $5,031.41 5 $1,006.28
Mulch $524.10 5 $104.82
Water $3,249.78 5 $649.96
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 5 $52.29
Backflow Certification $52.29 5 $10.46
Tree Trimming $836.56 5 $167.31
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 5 $46.01
Streetlights LS-1 70 W LED $465.16 5 $93.03
Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED $321.42 5 $64.28
Electricity $330.51 5 $66.10
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,302.71 Cost Per Parcel $2,260.54 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $66.86 5 $13.37
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $892.44 5 $178.49
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,049.94 5 $209.99
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $78.66 5 $15.73
Total Incidental Costs $2,087.90 Cost Per Parcel $417.58 Total Projected Costs $13,390.61 Cost Per Parcel $2,678.12 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $13,326.40
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,665.49
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$13,326.40
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,665.49
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($64.21)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $5,189.22
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$5,189.22
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE T (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $2,385.24 1 $2,385.24
Mulch $248.46 1 $248.46
Water $1,253.77 1 $1,253.77
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $52.29 1 $52.29
Tree Trimming $522.85 1 $522.85
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 1 $230.05
Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED $160.72 1 $160.72
Streetlights LS-1 22 W LED $129.82 1 $129.82
Electricity $330.51 1 $330.51
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $5,575.14 Cost Per Parcel $5,575.14 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Streetlights $24.63 1 $24.63
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $447.76 1 $447.76
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $526.77 1 $526.77
Operating Reserve - Streetlights $28.97 1 $28.97
Total Incidental Costs $1,028.13 Cost Per Parcel $1,028.13 Total Projected Costs $6,603.27 Cost Per Parcel $6,603.27 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $6,568.04
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,568.04
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,568.04
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,568.04
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($35.23)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,671.42
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,671.42
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE U (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Annual Parkway Landscaping Maintenance3 $1,200.00 28 $42.86 Water $3,702.00 28 $132.21
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 28 $8.93
Backflow Certification $50.00 28 $1.79
Tree Trimming $5,200.00 28 $185.71
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 28 $7.86
Streetlights LS-1 22 W LED $1,288.55 28 $46.02
Electricity $300.00 28 $10.71
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $12,210.55 Cost Per Parcel $436.09 Incidental Cost Projected No. of Cost Per
Function Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $928.37 28 $33.16
Administrative Costs - Streelighting $109.53 28 $3.91
Operating Reserve - Landscaping $1,092.20 28 $39.01
Operating Reserve - Streetlighting $128.86 28 $4.60
Rounding $30.49 28 $1.09
Total Incidental Costs $2,289.45 Cost Per Parcel $81.77 Total Projected Costs $14,500.00 Cost Per Parcel $517.86 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$14,500.00
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$517.86
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$14,500.00
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$517.86
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $ - ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY 2023-24 is the first year assessment.
3 Lump sum reflecting incidental cost for tree maintenance. Groundcover maintenance not included. Parkway groundcover area to be maintained by private entity (Home owners and/or HOA – as approved by the City).
ZONE W (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $13,634.59 1 $13,634.59
Mulch $1,526.20 1 $1,526.20
Water $8,285.46 1 $8,285.46
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 1 $261.43
Backflow Certification $104.57 1 $104.57
Tree Trimming $4,601.08 1 $4,601.08
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 1 $230.05
Electricity $330.51 1 $330.51
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $28,973.89 Cost Per Parcel $28,973.89 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs - Landscaping $2,461.35 1 $2,461.35 Operating Reserve - Landscaping $2,895.71 1 $2,895.71
Total Incidental Costs $5,357.06 Cost Per Parcel $5,357.06 Total Projected Costs $34,330.95 Cost Per Parcel $34,330.95 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $34,314.65
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34,314.65
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34,314.65
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$34,314.65
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($16.30)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $10,247.48
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,247.48
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE X (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Parcels Parcel
Annual Parkway Landscaping Maintenance3 $6,274.20 3 $2,091.40 Water (including water meter) $3,869.09 3 $1,289.70
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $261.43 3 $87.14
Backflow Certification $52.29 3 $17.43
Tree Trimming $3,764.52 3 $1,254.84
Fertilizer Injector $230.05 3 $76.68
Mulch $679.71 3 $226.57
Grafitti $5.23 3 $1.74
Streetlights LED (Market Street) $363.56 3 $121.19
Streetlights LED (Hall Ave; 24th St.) $121.19 3 $40.40
Electricity $330.51 3 $110.17
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $15,951.77 Cost Per Parcel$5,317.26 Incidental Cost Projected No. of Cost Per
Function Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administratition $1,272.83 3 $424.28
Inspection $795.52 3 $265.17
Operating Reserve $1,591.03 3 $530.34
Total Incidental Costs $3,659.37 Cost Per Parcel$1,219.79 Total Projected Costs $19,611.14 Cost Per Parcel $6,537.05 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $19,611.14
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,537.05
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$19,611.14
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$6,537.05
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $ - ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
ZONE Y (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost2 Acres Acre
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $44,216.61 202.02 $218.87 Mulch $1,526.20 202.02 $7.55
Water $10,252.04 202.02 $50.75
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $522.85 202.02 $2.59 Backflow Certification $104.57 202.02 $0.52
Tree Trimming $20,914.00 202.02 $103.52
Graffitti Abatement $3.40 202.02 $0.02
Fertilizer Injector $3,555.38 202.02 $17.60
Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Cactus Ave $5,508.50 202.02 $27.27 Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Sandstone Rd $11,017.00 202.02 $54.53 Traffic Signal El Rivino Rd & Cedar/Rubidoux Blvd $4,406.80 202.02 $21.81 Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Hall Ave $4,406.80 202.02 $21.81 Traffic Signal - Agua Mansa Rd/ Market St $2,203.40 202.02 $10.91 Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Market St/20th St $3,305.10 202.02 $16.36 Streetlights LS-1 LED (El Rivino Rd, Hall Ave, Brown Ave)$674.33 202.02 $3.34 Streetlights LS-1 LED (Rubidoux Blvd) $2,160.00 202.02 $10.69 Electricity $661.02 202.02 $3.27
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $115,438.00 Cost Per Acre $571.42 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs (8%) $9,081.34 202.02 $44.95
Inspections (5%) $5,675.84 202.02 $28.10
Operating Reserve, Repairs, and Replacements (10%)$11,351.67 202.02 $56.19 Total Incidental Costs $26,108.85 Cost Per Acre $129.24 Total Projected Costs $141,546.85 Cost Per Acre $700.66 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-242 $139,626.05
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$691.14
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$139,626.05
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$691.14
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 ($1,920.80)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $16,541.78
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$16,541.78
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves. 2 Streetlighting improvement costs were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity. All other costs and Maximum Assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for All Items.
ZONE Z (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Acres Acre
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $13,494.00 23.44 $575.68 Mulch $1,406.00 23.44 $59.98
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 23.44 $10.67 Backflow Certification $50.00 23.44 $2.13
Tree Trimming $3,000.00 23.44 $127.99
Water (inlcuding water meter) $7,449.00 23.44 $317.79
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 23.44 $9.39
Electricity (including electric meter) $300.00 23.44 $12.80 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $26,169.00 Cost Per Acre $1,116.42 City Project: Capital Improvements $365,000.00 23.44 $15,571.67 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs (8%) $2,225.00 23.44 $94.92
Operating Reserve (10%) $2,616.00 23.44 $111.60
Total Incidental Costs $4,841.00 Cost Per Acre $206.52
Total Projected Costs $396,010.00 Cost Per Acre $16,894.62 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $396,010.00
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $16,894.62
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $396,010.00
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $16,894.62
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
Zone DD is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
ZONE DD (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $935.00 3.00 $311.67
Mulch $137.00 3.00 $45.67
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 3.00 $83.33
Backflow Certification $50.00 3.00 $16.67
Tree Trimming $1,000.00 3.00 $333.33
Water (inlcuding water meter) $1,170.00 3.00 $390.00
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 3.00 $73.33
Grafitti Abatement $5.00 3.00 $1.67
Electricity (including electric meter) $300.00 3.00 $100.00 Rounding $76.00 3.00 $25.33
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $4,143.00 Cost Per Parcel $1,381.00 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs (8%) $346.00 3.00 $115.33
Inspection (5%) $204.00 3.00 $68.00
Operating Reserve (10%) $407.00 3.00 $135.67
Total Incidental Costs $957.00 Cost Per Parcel $319.00
Total Projected Costs $5,100.00 Cost Per Parcel $1,700.00 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $5,100.00
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $1,700.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $5,100.00
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $1,700.00
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
ZONE EE (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $5,040.00 25.00 $201.60
Mulch $525.00 25.00 $21.00
CalSense Subscription & Monitoring $250.00 25.00 $10.00 Backflow Certification $50.00 25.00 $2.00
Tree Trimming $2,100.00 25.00 $84.00
Water (including water meter) $3,222.00 25.00 $128.88
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 25.00 $8.80
Electricity (including electric meter) $300.00 25.00 $12.00 Rounding $27.20 25.00 $1.09
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $11,734.20 Cost Per Parcel $469.37 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $995.10 25.00 $39.80
Operating Reserve (10%) $1,170.70 25.00 $46.83
Total Incidental Costs $2,165.80 Cost Per Parcel $86.63 Total Projected Costs $13,900.00 Cost Per Parcel $556.00 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $13,900.00
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $556.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $13,900.00
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $556.00
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024 $0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
ZONE FF (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Acres Acre
Annual Landscaping Maintenance $7,351.79 31.67 $232.14
Mulch $739.20 31.67 $23.34
Water (including water meter) $7,202.00 31.67 $227.41
Electricity (including electric meter) $500.00 31.67 $15.79 CalSense Single $250.00 31.67 $7.89
Backflow Certification $50.00 31.67 $1.58
Tree Trimming $3,520.00 31.67 $111.15
Fertilizer Injector $220.00 31.67 $6.95
Repairs & Replacements (15%) $2,974.95 31.67 $93.94
Rounding $0.48 31.67 $0.72
Total Annual Landscaping Costs $22,808.42 Cost Per Acre $720.89 Streetlights LED (Mission Blvd) $1,308.94 31.67 $41.33
Streetlights LED (Pyrite Street) $681.92 31.67 $21.53
Total Annual Streetlighting Costs $1,990.86 Cost Per Acre $62.86 Traffic Signal at Mission Blvd. and Shops Entrance$10,000.00 31.67 $315.76 Traffic Signal at Pyrite St. and Shops Entrance $10,000.00 31.67 $315.76 Traffic Signal at Pyrite St. and SR-60 EB Ramps $4,500.00 31.67 $142.09 Traffic Signal at Pyrite St. and SR-60 WB Ramps $4,500.00 31.67 $142.09 Traffic Signal at Mission Blvd. and Pyrite St. $1,000.00 31.67 $31.58 Total Traffic Signal Costs $30,000.00 Cost Per Acre $947.27 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs (8%) $4,383.90 31.67 $138.42
Inspections (5%) $2,739.94 31.67 $86.52
Contingency (10%) $5,479.88 31.67 $173.03
Total Incidental Costs $12,603.72 Cost Per Acre $397.97 Total Projected Costs $67,403.00 Cost Per Acre $2,129.00 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $67,403.00
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,129.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$67,403.00
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,129.00
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
ZONE II (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
17 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Part IV – Assessment Diagrams
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.
If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parce ls shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.
Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.
12 | P a g e
ETIWANDA AVE
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAPCITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED ZONE O TR 32723 CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA E ½ W ½ NW ¼ SEC 18 T.2S. R.5W. VICINITY MAP For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the the County Subzone Boundary 183-310-034, 183-310-035, 183-310-036, 183-310-037, 183-310-038, 183-310-039, 183-310-040, 183-310-041, 183-310-042, 183-310-043 Project Site 183-310-034 183-310-036 183-310-038 183-310-037 183-310-041 183-310-042 183-310-035 183-310-040 183-310-039 183-310-043 14 | P a g e
68THSTREET
IVORY STREET
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ZONE T
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC.10 T.2S R.5W
26TH ST
RUBIDOUX BLVD
AVALON ST
LOCATION MAPVICINITY MAP
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
178-140-010
178-140-018
¯
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap,
INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China
(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri
SITE
¯
FOR DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND
DIMENSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBERS, REFER TO THE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP AS OF THE DATE OF THE REPORT.
Subzone Boundary
178-140-010
178-140-018
13 | P a g e
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE EE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PARCELS 6 THROUGH 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 31081, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STSATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 220, PAGES 49 THROUGH 51, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PM 37614
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.
Subzone Boundary
VICINITY MAP
167-110-035
167-110-036
167-110-037
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE FF
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP 21212, IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 153, PAGES 34 & 35, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PM 37614
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.
Subzone Boundary
VICINITY MAP
171-101-072
171-101-073
14 | P a g e
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
B - 1
PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS
Part V – Assessment Rolls
The District’s FY 2023-24 Assessment Rolls are voluminous and are filed in the office of the City Clerk and are by reference herein made a part of this Report.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
www.WeAreHarris.com
Chris Thomas
Project Manager
[email protected]
P: 619-481-5032
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEER’S REPORT VOLUME 2
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
STREETLIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F AND 2-G June 2023
PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
600 B
Street, Suite 2000
San Diego, CA 92101
619
-
236
-
1778
www.weareharris.com
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of Assessment Engineer ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Part I – Plans and Specifications ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Part II – Method of Apportionment ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses ............................................................................................................................. 13 Part IV – Assessment Diagrams ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Part V – Assessment Rolls ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
PROJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) – CITYWIDE.
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023–2024
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) has been prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum assessments that can be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel of land within each Zone of the District.
The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:
Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and article of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.
I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein.
2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.
3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor.
Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1- Consolidated have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the items being financed.
DATED this 7th day of June, 2023.
Alison M. Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Riverside
State of California
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Background
This combined Annual Engineer’s Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all annual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.
The 1972 Act provides for the annual levy of assessments for the Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C, for the express purpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing of the following:
• Landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation; Statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures;
• Public lighting facilities, including traffic signals; • Appurtenant facilities necessary for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including walls, sidewalks, and removal of debris; and
• Maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing, including the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments for an assessment district after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provision s in Proposition 218.
The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.
The Report prepared by the engineer must include maintenance plans for the improvements. The Report must also include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots whic h benefit from the improvements. Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved.
Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its rev iew and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.
In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners of the assessed parcels must approve any new or increased assessments. Zones included in this Report have been previously approved by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.
Part I – Plans and Specifications
INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Assessment Zone means the zones which include landscaping, water quality, streetlighting and other co mbinations of improvements. Street lighting Zone means a zone that only includes streetlighting improvements which includes streetlights and traffic signals.
There are 77 locations within the District: 47 separate assessment zones with 56 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 21 street lighting assessment zones with 21 locations.
There are 59 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (17) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consists of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F , Z, DD and Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on seven (7) locations within the District on Fiscal Year 2023-2024; these locations are in Assessment District Zone G, P, W, Y, EE, FF, II and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 68 existing Zones (77 locations). New or pending Zones will be presented to the City Council under separate reports.
Total number of Zones/Locations: 68 (77 locations)
Assessment Zones: 47 (56 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 21 (21 locations)
Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 55 within 47 Assessment Zones Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Locations (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 21 – within 15 Assessment Zones.
The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:
Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, DD, EE, FF and II.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G.
B. ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, Z, DD, II; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.
Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, EE, FF; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F
EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.
Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Locations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zone 137, Zone 17 3, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone F, Zone G, Zone I, Zone K, Zone L, Zone M, Zone N, Zone O, Zone P, Zone R, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone W, Zone X, Zone Y and Zone Z; and Street Lighting Zone 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 15, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, Street Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, Street Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2 -A, Street Lighting Zone 2 -B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, Street Lighting Zone 2-E, Street Lighting Zone 2-F and Street Lighting Zone 2-G.
Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements not yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, and Zone DD, Street Lighting Zone 69.
C. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities (also referred herein to as “streetlighting" or “traffic signals” ), and appurtenant facilities, including walls (also referred herein to as “fencing”), sidewalks (also referred herein to as “multi purpose trail”), and debris removal facilities (also referred herein to as “bio-swales” or “fossil filters”) are located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, spraying, fertilizing, or treatment for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel , power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, ornamental structures, public lighting facilities (also referred herein to as “street lighting"), and appurtenant facilities, including walls (also referred herein to as “fencing”), sidewalks, and debris removal facilities are located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, spraying, fertilizing, or treatment for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improveme nts to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.
Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.
Description of Improvements per Zone
Street Lighting Zone 5:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 5 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Galena Street
Street Lighting Zone 7:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 7 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Jurupa Road
Street Lighting Zone 15:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 15 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Etiwanda Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 17:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 17 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
La Rue Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 19:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 19 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Rubidoux Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 39:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 39 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Limonite Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 41:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 41 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Riverview Drive
Street Lighting Zone 62:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 62 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20th Street
Street Lighting Zone 69:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 69 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Carrerra Court Mustang Lane
Street Lighting Zone 86:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 86 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue Rutile Street
Street Lighting Zone 91:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 91 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Amarillo Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 93:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 93 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
37th Street Wallace Street
Street Lighting Zone 94:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 94 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20th Street Van Dell Road
Street Lighting Zone 102:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 102 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Fleming Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-A:
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-A generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bain Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-B:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-B generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Mission Boulevard Pyrite Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-C:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-C generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Lamelas Cir Sunnyhill Drive
Street Lighting Zone 2-D:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-D generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Iberia Street Etiwanda Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 2-E:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-E generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20th Street Caterpillar Court
Street Lighting Zone 2-F:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-F generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Bellegrave Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 2-G:
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-G generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
Hall Avenue Agua Mansa Avenue
Maintenance Plans
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are voluminous and are not bound in this Report but by this reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection. Copies are available in the office of the Riverside County Transportation Department, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. See the list below for plan numbers. Reduced maps of the maintained improvements are filled in Part IV of this Report; see Assessment Diagrams.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:
ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone 2-A IP17-007
Zone 2-B IP16-010
Zone 2-C IP16-009
Zone 2-D IP18-007
Zone 2-E GP19-007
Zone 2-F IP18-001
Zone 2-G
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Part II – Method of Apportionment
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value.
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.
In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Constitution (“Article”) requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.
SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of street lighting provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).
Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.
In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of street lighting specially benefit parcels within the District by increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. Street lighting also provides safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign right -of ways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. The y also provid e an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District. Streetlights are installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow th e street to perform to the standards it was designed.
Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conduci ve to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to re act safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility.
The system of streets within the District is established to provide access to each parcel in the District. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District.
Finally, the servicing of streetlights provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for properties within the District.
Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights are apportioned on a per acre or per parcel basis.
Based on the benefits described above, streetlights are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government -owned easements, utility easements, or flood channel parcels. Government-owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public.
As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not rece ive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.
Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including traffic signals, • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which ar e necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and;
• The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.
GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total streetlight servicing costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from Engineer’s Report – Volume 3
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
other City Fu nds. Because the streetlights are located immediately adjacent to properties within the District and are maintained solely for the benefit of the properties within the District, any benefit received by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit. As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
13 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES
Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses
INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.
The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire fiscal year (2023-2024), including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.
The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.
The inflation factor, for those zones with an inflation factor in place, may increase budgets for Zones, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed. However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.
Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F and 2-G, may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario County California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area or, as implemented on December 2017, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The annual CPI-U for All Items or CPI-U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI-U for All Items, or CPI-U for Electricity annual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property owners within each of the benefit zones in the District.
There is a two percent proposed inflationary increase in the maximum assessment per parcel or per acre as applicable in Street Lighting Zones 7, 41, 62, 69, 86, 93, and 102 over the maximum assessment for fiscal year 2022-2023 (if applicable), and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.
BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained during fiscal year 2023-2024 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditures, CPI-U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:
1. 1. LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone dated 05/19/2023; CFDLLMD 22 -23 YEAR END
ESTIMATES
The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 were prepared for this report – see following page JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $607.29 1 $607.29
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $607.29 Cost Per Parcel $607.29 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $51.61 1 $51.61
Contingency $60.73 1 $60.73
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $30.36 1 $30.36
Total Incidental Costs $142.70 Cost Per Parcel $142.70
Total Projected Costs $749.99 Cost Per Parcel $749.99
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $746.72
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$746.72
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$746.72
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$746.72
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($3.27)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $188.38
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$188.38
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 5 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcel Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $303.66 1 $303.66
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $303.66 Cost Per Parcel $303.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcel Acre
Administrative Costs $25.81 1 $25.81
Contingency $30.36 1 $30.36
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $15.18 1 $15.18
Total Incidental Costs $71.35 Cost Per Parcel $71.35
Total Projected Costs $375.01 Cost Per Parcel $375.01
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $376.55
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$376.55
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $442.16
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$442.16
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 7 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $607.29 1 $607.29
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $607.29 Cost Per Parcel $607.29 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $51.61 1 $51.61
Contingency $60.73 1 $60.73
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $27.54 1 $27.54
Total Incidental Costs $139.88 Cost Per Parcel $139.88
Total Projected Costs $747.17 Cost Per Parcel $747.17
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $748.65
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$748.65
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$747.17
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$747.17
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $188.38
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$188.38
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 15 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $1,270.08 9.85 $128.94 Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $278.81 9.85 $28.31
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,548.89 Cost Per Acre $157.25 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $131.65 9.85 $13.37
Contingency $27.88 9.85 $2.83
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $77.45 9.85 $7.86
Total Incidental Costs $236.98 Cost Per Acre $24.06
Total Projected Costs $1,785.87 Cost Per Acre $181.31
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,908.10
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$193.72
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,785.87
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$181.31
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $2,273.96
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$2,273.96
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 17 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 19 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $303.66 1 $303.66
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $303.66 Cost Per Parcel $303.66 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $25.81 1 $25.81
Contingency $30.36 1 $30.36
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $15.18 1 $15.18
Total Incidental Costs $71.35 Cost Per Parcel $71.35
Total Projected Costs $375.01 Cost Per Parcel $375.01
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $412.28
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$412.28
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$375.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $94.74
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$94.74
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 39 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $804.89 4.72 $170.53 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $804.89 Cost Per Acre $170.53 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $68.42 4.72 $14.50
Contingency $80.49 4.72 $17.05
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $33.05 4.72 $7.00
Total Incidental Costs $181.96 Cost Per Acre $38.55
Total Projected Costs $986.85 Cost Per Acre $209.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $381.49
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$80.82
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$381.49
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $80.82
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($605.36)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $328.05
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$328.05
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 41 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $207.10 0.37 $559.73
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $207.10 Cost Per Acre $559.73 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $17.61 0.37 $47.59
Contingency $20.71 0.37 $55.97
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $11.02 0.37 $29.78
Total Incidental Costs $49.34 Cost Per Acre $133.35
Total Projected Costs $256.44 Cost Per Acre $693.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $422.49
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,141.86
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$422.49
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,141.86
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$166.05
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $784.06
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $166.05
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$950.11
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 62 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV $607.29 3.84 $158.15 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $607.29 Cost Per Acre $158.15 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $51.61 3.84 $13.44
Contingency $60.73 3.84 $15.82
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $27.54 3.84 $7.17
Total Incidental Costs $139.88 Cost Per Acre $36.43
Total Projected Costs $747.17 Cost Per Acre $194.58
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $960.40
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$250.10
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$960.40
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$250.10
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$213.23
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $748.95
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $250.10
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$999.05
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 69 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV $495.77 6.45 $76.86
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $495.77 Cost Per Acre $76.86 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $42.14 6.45 $6.53
Contingency $49.58 6.45 $7.69
Total Incidental Costs $91.72 Cost Per Acre $14.22
Total Projected Costs $587.49 Cost Per Acre $91.08
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $2,589.11
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$401.41
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$2,589.11
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$401.41
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$2,001.62
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $8,757.80
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $2,001.62
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$10,759.42
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 86 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 765.77 20.18 $37.95
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 765.77 20.18 $37.95
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,531.54 Cost Per Acre $75.89 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $147.94 20.18 $7.33
Contingency $174.04 20.18 $8.62
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $87.02 20.18 $4.31
Total Incidental Costs $409.00 Cost Per Acre $20.27
Total Projected Costs $1,940.54 Cost Per Acre $96.16
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $3,770.95
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$186.87
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,770.95
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$186.87
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$1,830.41
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $6,165.65
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $1,830.41
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$7,996.06
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 91 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 791.81 3.87 $204.60
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 2507.45 3.87 $647.92 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $3,299.26 Cost Per Acre $852.52 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $280.44 3.87 $72.47
Contingency $329.93 3.87 $85.25
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $110.17 3.87 $28.47
Total Incidental Costs $720.54 Cost Per Acre $186.19
Total Projected Costs $4,019.80 Cost Per Acre $1,038.71 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $3,881.90
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,003.07
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$3,881.90
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,003.07
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($137.90)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,129.65
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,129.65
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 93 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 415.54 0.5 $831.08
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $415.54 Cost Per Acre $831.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $35.32 0.5 $70.64
Contingency $41.56 0.5 $83.12
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $20.78 0.5 $41.56
Total Incidental Costs $97.66 Cost Per Acre $195.32
Total Projected Costs $513.20 Cost Per Acre $1,026.40
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $957.12
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,914.24
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$957.12
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,914.24
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)$443.92
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,224.59
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $443.92
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,668.51
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 94 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 1,419.43 3.66 $387.82 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $1,419.43 Cost Per Acre $387.82 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $120.65 3.66 $32.96
Contingency $141.94 3.66 $38.78
Maintained Positive Fund Balance $66.10 3.66 $18.06
Total Incidental Costs $328.69 Cost Per Acre $89.81
Total Projected Costs $1,748.12 Cost Per Acre $477.63
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,282.10
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$350.30
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,282.10
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$350.30
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($466.02)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $411.68
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$411.68
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 102 (68-1560)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Acres Acre
Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 281.28 2.38 $118.18
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $281.28 Cost Per Acre $118.18 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $23.91 2.38 $10.05
Contingency $28.13 2.38 $11.82
Total Incidental Costs $52.04 Cost Per Acre $21.87
Total Projected Costs $333.32 Cost Per Acre $140.05
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $469.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$197.09
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$333.32
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$140.05
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $1,136.04
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$1,136.04
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by 2% 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-A (68-9963)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent660.95 3 $220.32 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $660.95 Cost Per Parcel $220.32 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $56.18 3 $18.73
Contingency $66.09 3 $22.03
Total Incidental Costs $122.27 Cost Per Parcel $40.76
Total Projected Costs $783.22 Cost Per Parcel $261.07
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $787.73
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$262.58
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$787.73
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$262.58
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $4.51
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-B (68-9956)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 100 Watt 9,500 Lumen LED Equivalent124.35 3 $41.45 Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent136.89 3 $45.63 Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $261.24 Cost Per Parcel $87.08 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $22.20 3 $7.40
Operating Reserve $26.12 3 $8.71
Total Incidental Costs $48.32 Cost Per Parcel $16.11
Total Projected Costs $309.56 Cost Per Parcel $103.19
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $311.31
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$103.77
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$309.56
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$103.19
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-C (68-9964)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 50 Watt LED 369.87 16 $23.12
Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 134.70 16 $8.42
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $504.57 Cost Per Parcel $31.54 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $42.89 16 $2.68
Operating Reserve $50.46 16 $3.15
Total Incidental Costs $93.35 Cost Per Parcel $5.83
Total Projected Costs $597.92 Cost Per Parcel $37.37
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $601.29
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$37.58
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$597.92
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $37.37
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-D (68-0238)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 850.13 2 $425.07
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $850.13 Cost Per Parcel $425.07 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $72.26 2 $36.13
Operating Reserve $85.02 2 $42.51
Total Incidental Costs $157.28 Cost Per Parcel $78.64
Total Projected Costs $1,007.41 Cost Per Parcel $503.71 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,013.07
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$506.54
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,007.41
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$503.71
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-E (68-0239)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 85 Watt LED 1,323.80 8 $165.48
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs$1,323.80 Cost Per Parcel $165.48 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $112.53 8 $14.07
Operating Reserve $132.38 8 $16.55
Total Incidental Costs $244.91 Cost Per Parcel $30.61
Total Projected Costs $1,568.71 Cost Per Parcel $196.09 MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $1,577.52
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$197.19
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$1,568.71
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$196.09
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
Zone 2-E is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-F (68-0240)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Street Lights - 85 Watt LED $134.28 6 $22.38
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $134.28 Cost Per Parcel $22.38 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost1 Parcels Parcel
Administrative Costs $11.41 6 $1.90
Operating Reserve $13.43 6 $2.24
Total Incidental Costs $24.84 Cost Per Parcel $4.14
Total Projected Costs $159.12 Cost Per Parcel $26.52
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $160.01
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$26.67
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$159.12
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $26.52
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.00
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
NOTES: UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 Streetlighting improvement costs an maximum assessment were escalated by the CPI-U for Electricity 3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED Projected No. of Cost Per
Maintenance Improvement Annual Cost Acres Acre
Streetlights (5) LED (Hall Ave) 544.61 23.44 $23.23
Streetlights (2) LED (Agua Mansa) 244.83 23.44 $10.45
Total Maintenance Improvement Costs $789.44 Cost Per Acre $33.68 Projected No. of Cost Per
Incidental Cost Annual Cost Acres Acre
Administrative Costs $67.10 23.44 $2.86
Operating Reserve $78.95 23.44 $3.37
Total Incidental Costs $146.05 Cost Per Acre $6.23
Total Projected Costs $935.49 Cost Per Acre $39.92
MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-241 $469.08
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$20.01
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 23-24$469.08
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 23-24 $20.01
PROJECTED ZONE SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)($466.41)
ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5/19/20231,2 $0.00
PROJECTED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)3 $0.00
ESTIMATED ENDING FUND BALANCE 6/30/2024$0.00
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 Beginning Fund Balance provided by the City of Jurupa Valley as of 5/19/2023 2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.
3 Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley. Surpluses added to Zone Reserves.
STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-G (TBD)
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
16 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Part IV – Assessment Diagrams
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.
If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.
Information identified on these maps was received fro m several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.
APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Page B-1
Page B-2
Page B-3
Page B-4
Page B-5
Page B-6
Page B-7
Page B-8
Page B-9
Page B-10
Page B-11
Page B-12
Page B-13
Page B-14
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-A
Serrano Business Center (PM 36828)
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 9, T.2S., R.6W., S.B.M. Schedule “E”
VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
156-210-093
156-210-093
Project Site
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-B
TR 36977
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA T2SR6W SEC 12 PSEC
VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
171-260-013
171-260-013
Project Site
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2 - C
TR 32722
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 7, T.2S, R. 5W
VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
174-170-039
174-170-03040
174-170-03041
Project Site
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-E
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 3, T. 2 S, R. 5 W, S.B.M.
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
175-160-027 175-160-044
Project Site
175-160-028 175-160-045
175-160-038 175-160-046
175-160-042 175-160-047
175-160-027
175-160-028
175-160-045
175-160-038
175-160-042
175-160-044
175-160-047
175-160-046
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s Parcel
numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map
as of the date of the Report.
ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-F
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 11, T. 2 S, R. 6 W, S.B.M.
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
169-060-005
Project Site
169-060-005
GLEN ST
MISSION BLVD
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTNING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-G
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFONRIA PORTIONS OF PARCEL MAP 24088, RECORDED IN BOOK 177, PAGE 37 OF MAPS, PORTION OF PARCEL MAP 12104, RECORDED IN BOOK 168, PAGE 51 OF MAPS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
AS OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
175-210-032
175-210-034
175-210-062
175-210-063
VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines
and dimensions of the applicable
Assessor's Parcel Numbers, refer
to the County Assessor's Map
as of the date of the Report.
AGUA MANSA ROAD
174-210-062
±
175-210-034
175-210-063
175-210-032
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY
HALL AVENUE
BROWN AVENUE
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS
Part V – Assessment Rolls
The District’s FY 2023-24 Assessment Rolls are voluminous and are filed in the office of the City Clerk and are by reference herein made a part of this Report.
Engineer’s Report – Volume 2
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2023-2024
www.WeAreHarris.com
Chris Thomas
Project Manager
Chris [email protected]
P: 619-481-5032
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DAT
E: J ULY 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.D
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
NO. 22004 (ZCA22004) ADDING CHAPTER 4.15 AND
AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 9 (“PLANNING AND ZONING”) OF THE
JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT SHORT-TERM
RENTALS AND FIND THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA
REVIEW PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION, CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and consider the two following alternatives:
1. Conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023-10, entitled:
AN O
RDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ADDING CHAPTER 4.15 TO THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF SHORT -TERM RENTALS
AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME-SHARING BUSINESSES MAKING RELATED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9.35, AND FINDING AN
EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES; or
2. A
dopt Resolution No. 2023-53, entitled:
A RESO
LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE PROPOSED ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT TO PROHIBIT SHORT -TERM RENTALS; AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15270(A) OF THE CEQA
GUIDELINES
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
BACKGROUND
On January 19, 2023, the Jurupa Valley City Council initiated a Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA) with the objective of prohibiting short-term rentals (STRs) in residential areas. This amendment was proposed in response to the observed adverse effects of STRs on local neighborhoods. Currently, the Jurupa Valley M unicipal Code lacks specific provisions addressing short-term rentals, rendering their operation impermissible within the C ity's permissive zoning framework.
Recent legal precedents have highlighted the necessity for jurisdictions to reinforce prohibitions against short -term rentals by explicitly incorporating relevant language into their zoning code. To address this, the City Council sought to introduce explicit regulations within the municipal code. These regulations would encompass a definition of STRs, an explicit prohibition on their use in residential areas, guidelines pertaining to advertisements related to STRs, and an established enforcement mechanism to address violations of the STR prohibition.
PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL RECOMMENDATION
On May 24, 2023, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendment regarding short -term rentals. After con ducting a public hearing, the Commission deliberated on the matter and explored alternative regulatory measures instead of a complete ban. Recommendations such as mandating homeowner presence, setting guest limitations, and introducing an annual registration fee were discussed to enhance safety and community benefits. The Planning Commission expressed its preference that STRs be regulated rather than prohibited.
Consequently, the Planning Commission advised against the proposed ban and directed staff to prepare a resolution stating the Planning Commission’s recommended denial. The resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at its June 14, 2023 meeting on a vote of 4-0.
This agenda item includes the Planning Commission’s adopted resolution recommending the denial of the short-term rental ban. Also included is the drafted ordinance that prohibits short-term rentals for the City Council's consideration.
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED PROHIBITION ORDINANCE
The proposed Short-Term Rental Prohibition Ordinance (Attachment 1) was prepared in accordance with the City Council’s original direction and is included for the City Council`s consideration. This ordinance amends the Municipal Code by adding a new chapter called "Prohibition of Short -Term Rental" to Title 4, which covers Miscellaneous Regulations.
Additionally, it includes code amendments to Chapter 9.35 in Title 9, which deals with Planning and Zoning. The Zoning Code Amendment includes several key aspects such as the intent and purpose of the amendment, a clear definition of short -term rentals, the prohibition of such rentals, and a framework to address violations. Provided below is a summary of the proposed sections to Titles 4 and 9:
Section 4.15.005 - Legislative Findings
This section provides the rationale for the prohibition, highlighting the negative consequences linked to short -term vacation rentals. It emphasizes that these rentals
Page | 3
contribute to affordable housing shortages and generate complaints about parking, noise, and refuse. Furthermore, they pose a risk to the character of neighborhoods by providing access to transient occupants. The proposed prohibitions aim to address these issues by prioritizing affordable housing for long- term renters, supporting the traditional lodging industry, and promoting the safety and character of neighborhoods.
Section 4.15.010 - Intent and Purpose
This section articulates the purpose, which includes the following: prohibiting short -term vacation rentals citywide, ensuring the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare, and reducing the costs associated with addressing service requests arising from short-term rentals.
Section 4.15.015 - Definitions
This section includes definitions for Short -Term Rental, Short -Term Rental Advertisement, Hosting Platform, Home-Sharing, and Booking Transaction. According to the recommended definitions, a Short -Term Rental refers to renting a dwelling for less than 30 consecutive days. Short -Term Rental Advertisement encompasses various means of publicizing the availability of short -term rental units. A Hosting Platform is any entity involved in facilitating home-sharing or vacation rental bookings. Home-Sharing is the practice of renting out a portion of a primary residence while the owner or leaseholder is present. Lastly, a Booking Transaction refers to the reservation or payment service provided by a hosting platform for home-sharing or vacation rentals.
Section 4.15.020 Prohibition of Short-Term Rentals
This section highlights the key prohibitions that would be enforced. These prohibitions include offering or renting out a dwelling (fully or partially) for less than 30 consecutive days in exchange for compensation; occupying a dwelling (fully or partially) for less than 30 consecutive days in exchange for compensation; and displaying any advertisement for a dwelling (fully or partially) available for less than 30 consecutive days.
Section 4.15.030 Violations; Public Nuisance
This section discusses the enforcement procedures for short -term rentals. It grants authority to the Code Enforcement Department for managing enforcement and addresses the consequences of violations. Violations of the chapter would be considered infractions and could be prosecuted as misdemeanors by the City Attorney's discretion. The ordinance also establishes the process for issuing administrative citations and utilizing subpoenas to obtain necessary information for enforcement. Violations are deemed unlawful and can be addressed through abatement, and the City may issue written notices of violation to relevant parties involved in the violation.
In accordance with the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, an administrative citation can be issued by a City Enforcement Officer as an alternative or addition to other available remedies. The fine amount for violations may start at $200 and increase up to $500 or $1,000 for subsequent offenses. Repeat violations can result in higher fines. The City is authorized to issue administrative subpoenas to gather specific information about prohibited short -term rental listings, such as responsible parties' names, listing addresses, length of stay, and payment details.
Page | 4
Adding New Section (Prohibition of short-term rentals) in Title 9 The recommended zoning code amendment would add the following new section (Prohibition of short -term rentals) to Chapter 9.35 (Zone Classifications) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning):
“Prohibition of short-term rentals. In no event shall short-term rentals as defined in Section 4.15.015 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use in any zone classification. Short -term rentals are prohibited in all zone classifications and no permit of any type shall be iss ued therefor.”
With this recommendation, a single- family dwelling in a residential zone, or a legal nonconforming single-family dwelling in a non-residential zone (commercial or industrial), cannot be used as a short-term rental.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is exempt from CEQA by the common- sense exemption. This recommended Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that prohibiting short -term rentals, will have a significant effect on the environment. This Ordinance is an exercise of the City’s police power to prohibit disruptive activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on Monday, June 26, 2023, providing a 10-day notice period before the hearing. Furthermore, the item was included as an agenda item for the City Council meeting scheduled on July 6, 2023, complying with the requirement of 72-hour notice prior to the hearing.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The expenses related to the proposed code amendment would be paid by the General Fund.
ALTERNATIVES
1. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2023- 10, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY ADDING CHAPTER 4.15 TO THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF SHORT -TERM RENTALS
AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME- SHARING BUSINESSES
MAKING RELATED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9.35, AND FINDING
AN EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE
CEQA GUIDELINES
2. Adopt a Resolution denying Zoning Code Amendment No. 22004 (ZCA22004)
3. Continue the Public Hearing and provide direction to staff
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Ordinance (approving Zoning Code Amendment)
Draft 7/6/23
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ADDING CHAPTER 4.1 5 TO THE JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF SHORT-
TERM RENTALS AND THE REQUIREMEN TS FOR HOME -SHARING
BUSINESSES MAKING RELATED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 9.35,
AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION
15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 4.15 (Prohibition of Short-Term Rentals) is hereby added to Title 4 (Miscellaneous Regulations) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to read as follows:
“Chapter 4.15 PROHIBITION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS
Sections:
4.15.005 Legislative findings.
4.15.010 Intent and purpose.
4.15.015 Definitions.
4.15.020 Prohibition of short-term rentals.
4.15.025 Hosting platform responsibilities.
4.15.030 Violation; public nuisance.
4.15.005 Legislative findings.
A. Short-term vacation rentals deplete the supply of affordable housing available in the City, generate frequent complaints regarding parking issues, noise disturbances, and garbage removal, and compromise the safety of neighborhood residents by providing access to buildings to transient occupants.
B. The prohibitions found in this chapter are reasonable and expected to alleviate affordable housing scarcity for the benefit of long -term renters, aid the City’s traditional lodging industry, and ensure the safety of residents.
4.15.010 Intent and purpose.
The purposes of this chapter are:
A. To prohibit short-term vacation rentals throughout the City; B. To protect public health, safety and general welfare of the community; and C. To reduce the costs for increased city service requests to resolve issues that arise from short-term rentals.
-2-
4.15.015 Definitions.
The definitions contained in this section shall govern the construction of this chapter.
A. “Short-term rental” shall mean the rental of a dwelling (in whole or in part) by owner(s) or lessee( s) to another person or group of people for occupancy , dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes for a period of less th an 30 consecutive days . The rental of units w ithin city- approved hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts, community care facilities, social care facilities, single-room occupancy facilities, farmworker housing, emergency shelters, transitional and supportive housing, and low barrier navigation centers shall not be considered to be a short-term rental.
B. “Advertisement” means any print or online publication used for conveying to members of the public the ability or availability to rent a short -term rental unit as defined in this section. For the purposes of this section, advertisements include newspaper advertisements, billboard displays, verbal or written announcements, email or digital messaging, or any internet website platform.
C. “Hosting platform” is any natural person, business, or organization of any kind who participates in an approved home-sharing or vacation rental business by collecting or receiving a fee, directly or indirectly through an agent or intermediary, for conducting a booking transaction using any medium of facilitation.
D. “Home-sharing” means an accessory use of a primary residence, such as making a room or part of a room available for rent in a primary residence while the owner or leaseholder resides in the unit during the guest’s stay.
E. “Booking transaction” is any reservation or payment service provided by a hosting platform who facilitate s a home-sharing or vacation rental transaction between a prospective transient user and an owner
F. “Owner” is any person who owns the subject property.
4.15.020 Prohibition of short-term rentals.
It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to:
A. Offer or make available for rent or to rent (by way of a rental agreement, lease, license or any other means, whether oral or written) for compensation or consideration a dwelling (in whole or in part) for less than 30 consecutive days; B. Occupy a dwelling (in whole or in part) for less than 30 consecutive days pursuant to a rental agreement, lease, license or any other means, whether oral or written, for compensation or consideration; or
C. Maintain any a dvertisement of a dwelling (in whole or in part) for less than 30 consecutive days.
-3-
4.15.025 Hosting platform responsibilities.
A. Subject to applicable laws, hosting platforms shall disclose to the City on a regular basis each residential property listing located in the City, the names of the persons responsible for each listing, the address of each listing, the length of stay for su ch listing and the price paid for each stay.
B. A hosting platform shall not complete any booking transaction for any dwelling or property purporting to be a short-term rental business.
C. A hosting platform shall not collect or receive fees, directly or indirectly through an agent or intermediary, for facilitating or providing services ancillary to a residential property rental, including, but not limited to, insurance, concierge services, catering, restaurant bookings, tours, guide services, entertainm ent, cleaning, property management, or maintenance of the residential property or unit.
D. A host ing platform operating exclusively on the Internet in compliance with subsections above shall be presumed to be in compliance with this chapter, except that the host remains responsible for compliance with the administrative subpoena provisions of this chapter.
E. The provisions of this section shall be interpreted in accordance with otherwise applicable state and federal law(s) and will not apply if determined by the City to be in violation of, or preempted by, any such law(s).
4.15.030 Violation; public nuisance.
A. Any violation of this chapter is unlawful, is hereby declared a public nuisance, and may be abated and enjoined by the Enforcement Officer or any other designee in any manner provided by law.
B. Any violation of this chapte r constitutes an infraction offense, and may be prosecuted as a misdemeanor at the discretion of the City Attorney. Each violation constitutes a separate offense punishable as set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 1.15.010.
C. The C ity may issue a written notice of violation to any occupant, responsible person, loc al contact person, owner, owner’ s authorized agent or representative, or hosting platform if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties.
D. Pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 1.20, a City Enforcement Officer may issue an administrative citation for any violation of this chapter. Such administrative remedy may be exercised in place of, or in addition to, any administrative, criminal, civil , or equitable remedy allowed by law. The administrative fine amount shall be either two hundred ($200) and may increase on separate events to five hundred dollars ($500), and one -thousand
-4-
dollars ($1,000), or an amount set by a resolution adopted by the City Council pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 1.20.060. The City may increase fines for repeat violations.
E. The City may issue and serve administrative subpoenas as necessary to obtain specific information regarding prohibited short-term rental listings located in the City, including, but not limited to, the names of the persons responsible for such listing, the address of each such listing, the length of stay for each such listing, and the price paid for each stay. Any subpoena issued pursuant to this section shall not require the production of information sooner than thirty (30) days from the date of service. A person that has been served an administrative subpoena may seek judicial review during that thirty-day period.”
SECTION 2. Section 9.35.070 (Prohibition of short-term rentals) is hereby added to Chapter 9.35 (Zone Classifications) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to read as follows:
“Prohibition of short-term rentals. In no event shall short-term rentals as defined in Section 4.15.015 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use in any zone classification. Short-term rentals are prohibited in all zone classifications and no permit of any type shall be issued therefor.”
SECTION 3. This Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen wit h certainty that there is no possibility that this Ordinance , prohibiting short-term rentals , will have a significant effect on the environment. This Ordinance is an exercise of the City’s police power to prohibit disruptive activities that will not resul t in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. The City Council has reviewed the administrative record concerning this Ordinance and the proposed CEQA determinations, and based on its own independent judgment, finds that the Code Amendment set forth in this Ordinance is not subject to, or exempt from, the requirements of the CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).
SECTION 4. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cau se the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall take effect on ________, 2023.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this ___ day of _______, 2023.
-5-
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2023 -10 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 6th day of July, 2023 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of July, 2023, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 20th day of July, 2023.
________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Resolution (denying Zoning Code Amendment)
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY DENYING THE PROPOSED
ZONING CODE AMENDMEN T TO PROHIBIT SHORT -
TERM RENTALS; AND FINDING AN EXEM PTION FROM
CEQA UNDER SECTION 15270(A) OF THE CEQA
GUIDELINES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Project and Findings.
(a) At the January 19, 2023, regular City Council meeting, the City Council initiated a zoning code amendment to prohibit short-term rentals in any zone classification (the “Zoning Code Amendment”).
(b) Section 9.285.030.(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code p rovides that the Planning Commis sion shall hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to the City ’s Zoning Ordi nance th at propose to regulate the use of structures or b uildings, and that the amendment must be processed pursuant to Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance will prohibit short-term rentals in any zone classification.
(c) Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing , the Planning Commission shall render its decision within a reasonable time and transmit it to the City Council in the form of a written recommendation, which shall contain the reasons for the recommendation . A copy of the reco mmendation shall be transmitted to the City Council. If the Planning Commission does not reach a decision due to a tie vote, that fact shall be reported to the City Council and the failure to reach a decision shall be deemed a recommendation against the proposed amendment. (d) Section 9.285.040.(4)(a) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day and give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission.
Section 2. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The Zoning Code Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On May 24, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the Zoning Code Amendment, at which time all persons interested in the Zoning Code Amendment had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these
-2-
matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing, and, after weighing the evidence and considering the adequacy of the Zoning Code Amendment, applied its own independent judgment and analysis to the review and directed the staff to prepare a resolution to recommend that the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley deny the proposed prohibition of short-term rentals.
(c) On June 14 , 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-12 recommending denial of the Zoning Code Amendment. (d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, based on its own independent judgment, does hereby find, determine and declare that the Zoning Code Amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq. ) and the State Guidelines (the “CEQA Guidelines”) ( 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.) pursuant to Section 15270(a) of the CEQA Guidelines because CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.
Section 4. Findings for Denial of Zoning Code Amendment . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find and determine that the Zoning Code Amendment should be denied because short-term rentals provide certain financial and social benefits to the City and its residents, and tailored regulations of the use ‒ rather than an outright prohibition ‒ may address the negative impacts associated with short-term rentals.
Section 5. Denial. Based on the foregoing, the City Counci l of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby denies the Zoning Code Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
Section 6. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 6th day of July, 2023.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
-3-
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-53 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 6th day of July, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 6th day of July, 2023.
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Resolution No. PC-2023-12
Chair Shultz, Chair Pro Tem Newman, Commissioners
Jackson, Pruitt and Villagomez
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PC Minutes (May 24, 2023)
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
May 24, 2023
CALL TO ORDER Chair Laura Shultz called the Regular Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL Members Present:
• Laura Shultz, Chair
• Penny Newman, Chair Pro Tem
• Arleen Pruitt, Commission Member
• Yessenia Villagomez, Commission Member
Member(s) Absent:
• Hakan Jackson, Commission Member
PLEDGE OF Commissioner Pruitt led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC COMMENTS/ No Comments Received.
APPEARANCE
CONSENT CALENDAR Agenda Items 1, 2 and 3 were unanimously approved by the motion of C hair Pro Tem Newman and seconded by Commissione r Villagomez. The motion carried ( 4-0), with Commissioner Jackson absent.
Ayes: Shultz, Newman, Pruitt, and Villagomez
Noes: None
Abstained: None
Absent: Jackson
PUBLIC HEARING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23111: REVISION NO. 1 SITE
ITEM NO. 4 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 18044, A REQUEST TO
MODIFY CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 9 TO REQUIRE A
DEPOSIT PAYMENT FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFF -SITE EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF CASTELLANOS ROAD
AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW IS
REQUIRED PURSUANT CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162
Rob Gonzalez, Se nior Planner, provided a staff report and recommended t hat the Commission open the Public Hearing and continue the Public Hearing to the June 14 , 2023, Planning Commission meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
No comments received.
Commissioner Pruitt moved and Chair Pro Tem Newman seconded to continue the item to the June 14, 2023 meeting. The motion was approved (4-0), with Commissioner Jackson absent.
Ayes: Shultz, Newman, Pruitt and Villagomez
Noes: None
Abstained: None
Absent: Jackson
PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL NO. 23002: A REQUEST FOR A SETBACK
ITEM NO. 5 ADJUSTMENT FOR THE DREASE OF THE REAR YARD
SETBACK FROM TEN (10) FEET TO TWO AND A HALF (2 ½)
FEET
Jesus Huerta, Associate Planner provided a PowerPoint presentation for the request to appeal the Community Development Director’s approval of a s Setback Adjustment to allow an existing patio cover to be six feet from the rear property line instead of the required ten (10) feet. The appellant reque sted a rear yard setback adjustment from ten (10) feet to two and a half (2 ½) feet.
Commissioner Villagomez inquired if the property owner purchased the home with the patio cover asked if the HOA approved the patio cover.
Associate Planner Huerta informed the Commission that the property owner built the patio cover with the approval of the HOA.
Commissioner Pruitt inquired if the ten (10) foot setback was established for safety concerns.
Associate Planner Huerta informed the Commission that the setbacks were established to preserve open space, separation, and viewscape from adjacent properties.
Chair Pro Tem Newman inquired if permits were on file for the patio covers from the surrounding properties visible in the aerial photo provided.
Associate Planner Huerta informed the Commission based on the background research on the surrounding properties the City does not have permits on file for the surrounding patio covers.
Community Development Director Perez informed the Commission that the applicant approached the City to obtain a permit for the patio cover once she realized that the contractor did not go through the proper process.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Kim Clarke, applicant , thanked the Commission for their time and consideration. Ms. Clarke informed the Commission that she inquired with the HOA to get approval for the patio cover. She then hired a contractor to build the patio cover and get permits with the City. Once she realized that the contractor failed to obtain the proper permits from the City, she approached the City.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Chair Pro Tem N ewman expressed that she would be in favor of allowing the two and a half (2 ½) setback.
Commissioner Pruitt thanked the applicant for doing her due diligence and that it is unfortunate that the Contractor did not obtain the proper permits from the City. Commissioner Pruitt also express ed that she would be in favor of allowing the two and a half (2 ½) setback.
Chair Shultz agreed with Chair Pro Tem Newman and Commissioner Pruitt.
Commissioner Villagomez also expressed that she would be in favor of allowing the two and a half (2 ½) setback.
Commissioner Pruitt moved and Chair Pro Tem Newman seconded to deny Resolution No. PC -2023-11 and requested staff to bring back a resolution approving a Setback Adjustment of two and a half (2 ½) for an attached patio cover.
The motion was approved (4-0), with Commissioner Jackson absent.
Ayes: Shultz, Newman, Pruitt and Villagomez
Noes: None
Abstained: None
Absent: Jackson
PUBLIC HEARING ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 22004 ADDING CHAPTER
ITEM NO. 6 4.15 AND AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 9 OF THE JURUPA
VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT SHORT TERM
RENTALS AND FIND THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT
FROM CEQA REVIEW PURSUANT TO THE
COMMONSENSE EXEMPTION, CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(b)(3)
Rob Gonzalez, Senior Planner , provided a PowerPoint presentation for Zoning Code Amendment to prohibit Short Term Rentals (STRs).
On January 19, 2023, the City Council initiated a Zoning Code Amendment to prohibit STRs i n residential zoning districts and adding a method to enforce the restriction. The number of STR of residential dwelling units has grown rapidly in the City. Base d on public input and research, STRs are associated with well-documented negative secondary impacts, which have detrimental effects on public health, safety, welfare. Some of the most significant negative impacts of short-term rentals are reduced availabil ity of housing, increased housing costs, increased noise and traffic, loss of community character, and strain on local resources.
Based on the objectives and City Council direction, a recommended Short-Term Rental Prohibition Ordinance has been prepared to amend the Municipal Code by adding Chapter 4.15 – “Prohibition of Short - Term Rental” to Title 4 with related code amendments to Chapter 9.35 to Title 9. The Zoning Code Amendment would include the following:
Intent and purpose; definition; short -term ren tals prohibition; and a way to address violations.
Chair Pro Tem Newman inquired what brought the STR to the City Council’s attention.
Senior Planner Gonzalez informed the Commission that the City has received 23 complaints over STRs and that the City’s Municipal Code does not address STR.
Commissioner Newman inquired if the surrounding cities are prohibiting STRs.
Senior Planner Gonzalez informed the Commission that staff surveyed 7 cities and 2 cities have prohibited STRs.
Commissioner Pruitt inquired if the 23 complaints received were for the same property.
Senior Planner Gonzalez informed the Commission that staff did not receive that information.
Commissioner Villagomez inquired what would happen to current STRs.
Community Development Director Perez informed the Commission that the City would identify current STRs and inform them of the prohibition.
Chair Pro Tem Newman inquired i f the City has looked into allowing STRs.
Community Development Perez informed the Commission that the direction of City Council was to prohibit the use of STRs.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Stephanie Castillo, resident and Arbnb host, spoke against the prohibition of STRs. Ms. Castillo informed the Commission that the STR allows her to financially provide for her family. In addition, website platforms verify the person renting the units. In the years that she has been hosting she has not had any issues.
Nicole Sims, resident, spoke against the prohibition of STRs. Ms. Sims urged the Commission to explore an alternative solution to allow STRs.
Deanna Conner, resident, spoke against the prohibition of STRs and expressed that it is a great method to allow people to explore the City.
Roberto Ramirez, resident, said he saw the reasoning on both sides of the issue and requested that the Commission consider regulating STRs.
Kevin Sims, spoke against the prohibition of STRs.
Erika Soriano, Administrative Services Coordinator , read into the record the following emails:
Jin Hanqing, wrote against the prohibition of STRs and requested that the Commission implement regulations for STRs.
Dennis Sonney, resident, wrote against the prohibition of STRs and requested that the Commission establish reasonable regulations and guidelines to allow STRs.
Karla Cool, resident, wrote against the prohibition of STRs and expressed the need for STRs in the Community.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Chair Pro Tem Newman requested a study on what other Cities are doing with STRs.
Commissioner Pruitt requested that the City look into regulating STRs rather than prohibition.
Commissioner Villagomez also requested that the City look into regulating STRs.
Chair Shultz agreed with the other Commissioners and requested that staff provide a survey of STRs and how they are regulated.
Commissioner Pruitt moved and Chair Pro Tem Newman seconded to deny Resolution No. PC -2023-12 and directed staff to bring back a resolution recommending t hat the City Council deny a Zoning Code Amendment to prohibit Short-Term Rental and to provide a survey of the surrounding cities that regulate Short-Term Rentals.
The motion was approved (4-0), with Commissioner Jackson absent.
Ayes: Shultz, Newman, Pruitt and Villagomez
Noes: None
Abstained: None
Absent: Jackson
Chair Shultz called a recess at 8:55 P.M and reconvened the meeting at 9:02 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE
ITEM NO. 7 WITH THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION: 1)
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS
(GPA23005, GPA23006, GPA23007, GPA23008); 2) ZONING
MAP AMENDMENTS (CZ23008, CZ23009, CZ23010, CZ23011);
APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO A CERTIFIED
PROGRAMMATIC FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Mary Wright, Principal Planner, provided a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed amendment to ensure compliance with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The City was required to identify sites throughout the City to achieve the City’s RHNA of 4,497 units.
This process resulted in the identification of 19 sites, totaling 70.84 acres, to be redesignated to the Highest Density Residential Density (HHDR) and rezoned to General Residential (R-3) to meet RHNA.
The Housing Eleme nt site inventory included an assumption that Planning Area 2 of Paradise Knolls would develop 300 dwelling units at 28.4 dwelling units per acre as specified in the Specific Plan.
However, on January 19, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing and a pproved two residential projects on Planning Are a 2 of the Paradise Knolls development at densities lower than those identified in the Housing Element. Due to this decrease in density, the City is now in deficit of its low-income housing RHNA obligations.
The City needs to redesignate a minim um of 6.6 acres of additional property to HHDR and rezone to R-3 to make up the shortfall. The City Council held two public hearings on March 16, 2023 and April 6, 2023 and reviewed fifteen sites for potential redesig nation to HHDR and rezone to R -3 to make up the RHNA shortfall. The City Council initiated General Plan Land Use and Zoning map amendments on portions of Sites 5a and 14a and requested additional information regarding site 15a.
Site 5a is located in the Jurupa Valley/Pedley transit station to the south and was determined by the City Council to be an appropriate location for increased residential density, which would be supportive of public transit. The City Council directed that a General Plan Land Use map amendment to HHDR and Zoning map amendment to R-3 be initiated for the western portions of each parcel with the areas adjacent to Pedley Road to remain unchanged. The actions would change the we stern portions of each parcel to HHDR and R -3 approximately 15.8 acres.
The area has been divided into three separate general plan amendments and rezones as the current zoning of each area is different.
Site 14a includes one parcel of land consisting of 4.0 acres located immediately eat of Baldwin Avenue and south of Limonite Avenue in the De Anza Marketplace. The site is appropriate for residential uses in that it is in an underutilized site near supportive retail uses.
Site 15a includes four parcels of land totaling 6.71 acres located on the east side of Clay Street, on either side of Linares Avenue, and across Clay Street from the Rock Rose and Bayberry Place project site. The City Council directed staff to explore whether the project applicant of the three northern parcels would be willing to consider higher density, and to confirm the presence of a gas line on the southern parcel and whether it would prelude residential development. The applicant was asked if they would be interested in increasing the project density to
help make-up for the identified RHNA shortfall. Due to the history of the project and pending application, the applicant is not interested in pursuing additional density at this time.
In regards to the site on the south side of L inares Ave., there is a Southern California natural gas transmission pipeline located beneath the site in a northwest to southeast direction. Because of this, residential uses on the site would be required to observe significant setbacks from the pipeline , which would limit the amount of land available for development. Re -designation of the site to HHDR and rezone to R-3 is not recommended.
Commissioner Pruitt clarified that the Commission is looking only at sites 5a and 14a for consideration.
Principal Planner Wright informed the Commission that those two sites were identified by the City Council for re-designation to HHDR.
Commissioner Villagomez inquired if Site 5a northern parcel was part of the equestrian overlay.
Principal Planner Wright informed the Commission that the northern parcel of Site 5a is part of the equestrian overlay.
Commissioner Villagomez suggested that the Commission consider GPA23007 parcel and Site 14a for re-zoning.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Gary Cooner, resident, spoke against the re-zoning to higher density.
Jenifer Dieleman, resident, spoke against the re- zoning to higher density in the Mira Loma area. Ms. Dieleman does not want low - income housing across from her home.
Roberto Ramirez, resident, spoke against re -zoning to higher density in the Mira Loma area. Mr. Ramirez requested that the rezones be implemented in other parts of the City.
Erika Soriano, Administrative Services Coordinator , read into the record an email received from Debi Myers, representative of the owner