Cities Index.
Agenda

Jurupa Valley City Council
February 15, 2024

Document
Agenda
Meeting
February 15, 2024
Body
Jurupa Valley City Council
Pages
19
Original file
157.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.jurupavalley.org. That file is the official record.

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

THAT MIGHT INDICATE AN INTRUDER HAS ENTERED CUSTOMER’S PREMISES WITHOUT BEING ACCOMPANIED BY THE POLICE OR A LICENSED SECURITY OFFICER.

CUSTOMER FURTHER UNDERSTANDS AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT Johnson Controls WILL NOT (A) CONTACT ANYONE ON CUSTOMER’S EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST, OR (B) SEND THEM A SUPPLEMENTARY ALARM NOTICE UNTIL, IN EACH CASE, THIRTY (30) MINUTES AFTER RECEIVING A PANIC OR DURESS ALARM EVENT SIGNAL FROM CUSTOMER’S ALARM EQUIPMENT. 4. Johnson Controls will use reasonable care in the installation and, if purchased, the maintenance of the System. However, in light of the inherent and unpredictable nature of radio waves, radio wave interference, inconsistencies with broadband or Internet service, risk of human error, and the inherent possibilities of mechanical, electrical or other deficiencies or limitations in electronic equipment and software, Johnson Controls cannot and does not guarantee or warrant the effective or uninterrupted availability of the Services or use of the Equipment in connection therewith. 5. Customer acknowledges that it has no contractual relationship with Johnson Controls’ Suppliers, and Customer is not a third party beneficiary of any agreement between Johnson Controls and its Suppliers, including but not limited to any third party network service providers (“NSP”) who provide voice, data or internet services to Johnson Controls or its Suppliers. Customer understands and agrees that an NSP shall have no legal, equitable, or other liability of any kind to Customer. 6. Johnson Controls does not warrant and Johnson Controls will not provide warranty service (whether under the standard Limited Warranty or any Extended Limited Warranty/Quality Service Plan) for the batteries contained in any Device/Equipment or the replacement thereof. Customer shall test the System and batteries periodically to determine whether the batteries are charged and operating properly. Johnson Controls further does not warrant and will not provide warranty service for any part of the System obtained independently by Customer or serviced/modified by Customer or any third party. Johnson Controls IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY EQUIPMENT/DEVICES NOT PROVIDED BY Johnson Controls AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES OR LIABILITIES OF ANY KIND OR NATURE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUCH EQUIPMENT/DEVICES. Any additional equipment or replacement, not covered by warranty, ordered by Customer to be drop-shipped to Customer, will be provided if such equipment is available at the time ordered and will be billed at Johnson Controls’ then-prevailing price for such equipment (plus shipping, handling, and any applicable sales tax) for such equipment/replacement. Customer’s installation and use of any such equipment shall be subject to the terms of the Agreement and this Rider. 7. IF THE SERVICES ARE TERMINATED:
(A) JOHNSON CONTROLS WILL NO LONGER PROVIDE (I) ANY SUPPLEMENTARY ALARM NOTICE OR ELECTRONIC NOTICE, OR (II) LIMITED/EXTENDED WARRANTY OR REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT SERVICES FOR CUSTOMER’S EQUIPMENT, (B) CUSTOMER WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO USE OR MONITOR THE EQUIPMENT OR ANY

RECORDINGS AND SUCH RECORDINGS THEN STORED BY JOHNSON CONTROLS WILL BE, IN THE NORMAL COURSE OF JOHNSON CONTROLS' BUSINESS, PERMANENTLY

REMOVED FROM JOHNSON CONTROLS' SYSTEM(S), AND (C) ANY AUTOMATIONS, SCHEDULES, SUPPLEMENTARY ALARM NOTICES AND ELECTRONIC NOTICES SET UP THROUGH THE JOHNSON CONTROLS MSM SITE WILL NO LONGER BE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMER. ALL Z-WAVE DEVICES THAT HAVE BEEN INSTALLED ON OR AROUND THE CUSTOMER’S PREMISES MAY STILL FUNCTION, IF CUSTOMER PURCHASES A LOCAL Z-WAVE REMOTE CONTROL. DISCONTINUANCE OF THE SERVICES WILL NOT

AFFECT THE ABILITY OF THE ALARM EQUIPMENT TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE CMC UNLESS THE MONITORING SERVICE PROVIDED UNDER THE AGREEMENT HAS ALSO BEEN DISCONTINUED. REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS STATED ABOVE, CUSTOMER MAY NOT TERMINATE ANY SERVICE PROVIDED UNDER THE AGREEMENT DURING THE TERM OTHER THAN AS EXPRESSLY PERMITTED IN THE AGREEMENT. 8. A number of factors in Customer’s premises are outside of Johnson Controls’ control such as lighting conditions, power outages, interference from other electrical equipment, Internet service issues such as download speed or interruptions or failure of Internet service. Such factors can affect Customer’s ability to view and record/capture data/images. Johnson Controls makes no representations, promises or warranties with regards to and that Customer has reviewed and found acceptable the placement, image quality, resolution, clarity, color or other viewing attributes of any camera or recording devices furnished by or installed by Johnson Controls.

9. Network Connections and Communications Facilities. Johnson Controls’ provision of the Services requires cellular data, broadband and/or DSL Internet, networked devices such as computers, personal digital assistants, cellular telephones/devices, routers and network connectivity (individually and collectively referred to as a “Network” and/or “Network Devices”) that is compatible with the System. Johnson Controls will configure the settings on the System to work with Customer’s Network and Network Devices. Johnson Controls will not alter Customer’s Network, Network Devices, or firewall or security settings. Johnson Controls is not responsible for the setup, operation, maintenance or compatibility of Customer’s Network or Network Devices or communication facilities. Customer is solely responsible for any telecommunications or other connectivity charges (including SMS charges) incurred as a result of using the Services. Customer shall be solely responsible for resolving any disputes with any telephone/Internet service company related to same. The speed and quality of remote video viewing is directly dependent upon the speed and quality of Customer’s Network and Network Devices used with the Equipment. Johnson Controls is not responsible for performance issues or failures resulting from the Network, Network Devices or any hardware, software or other service provided by Customer for use with the Services including, without limitation, Internet latency, local area networks and non-conforming or non-compatible Network Devices or software. Customer may incur additional charges if the Network information Customer provides to Johnson Controls is incomplete or inaccurate or, if at the time of installation, Customer’s Network connectivity is not available or Customer’s Network is incompatible with the Equipment and such occurrence results in Johnson Controls spending excess time or re-scheduling appointments to complete the installation. Customer is responsible for purchasing, at Customer’s expense, any equipment required to connect the Equipment to Customer’s Network including, without limitation, a router and any network switches needed for Johnson Controls to complete the installation of the Equipment and Customer’s utilization of the Services. Requests for service or support should be made to Johnson Controls at 800-289-2647. Johnson Controls will retain the ability to remotely access Customer’s Equipment and System for maintenance purposes and in order to expedite installation in connection with new Customer location service requests.

Use of certain System features requires Customer to: (a) have access to the Internet and an e-mail or text-message address; and (b) accept and continue to accept the Johnson Controls' MSM Site Terms and any other terms and conditions required for access to and use of the Johnson Controls' MSM Site, as such terms and conditions may change from time to time, and (c) obtain valid User identifications, passwords, and/or personal identification codes (“PIC(s)”) to access the Johnson Controls' MSM Site. The Johnson Controls' MSM Site Terms may be updated or modified by Johnson Controls from time to time at its sole discretion and without notice to Customer. Changes to the Johnson Controls' MSM Site Terms will be effective when posted. Customer agrees to review the Johnson Controls' MSM Site Terms periodically to be aware of any changes. Customer will be deemed to have accepted any modified Johnson Controls MSM Site Terms if Customer continues to use the Johnson Controls MSM Site after such modified terms have been posted. Customer may have the option to remain logged onto the Johnson Controls' MSM Site from Customer’s PDA or other equipment for an extended period. Persons who obtain access to Customer’s Network and Network Devices while it is logged onto the Johnson Controls' MSM Site, may be able to view the images and data contained on or transmitted to the Johnson Controls' MSM Site. Customer is solely responsible for the security of Customer’s PICs, Network and Network Devices or other equipment used to log onto the Johnson Controls' MSM Site. Customer releases Johnson Controls and its Suppliers from and shall upon demand indemnify and hold Johnson Controls and its Suppliers harmless from any loss, damage or other liability arising from any person obtaining access to Customer’s personal and private information through Customer’s Network, Network Devices or other equipment used to log onto the Johnson Controls' MSM Site.

A.14. Software Support Services – No Upgrades. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.15. Lynx Network Duress and Emergency Notification System (“Lynx System”). Intentionally left blank – Lynx System/Services have not been purchased.

A.16. RFID Tracking System (“System”). Intentionally left blank – RFID Systems have not been purchased.

A.17. HID SEOS Mobile Credential Service (“Service”). Intentionally left blank – Service has not been purchased.

A.18. Customer For Life Program (“Service”). Intentionally left blank – Service has not been purchased.

A.19. Outdoor Radar Perimeter Protection. Intentionally left blank – System has not been purchased.

A.20. Self-Printing Service. Intentionally left blank – Service has not been purchased.

A.21. Audio Enabled Devices. Intentionally left blank – Equipment has not been purchased.

A.22. Proactive Health Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.23. Automated Notification. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.24. Remote Technical Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased A.25. Anyvision Devices. Intentionally left blank – Equipment has not been purchased.

A.26. WhosOnLocation Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.27. Vape Detection System. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.28. Alcatraz Cloud Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.29. CloudVue Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.30. Visual Alarm Verification Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.31. Halo Smart Sensor System. Intentionally left blank - System have not been purchased.

Page 8 of 22 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

A.32. Embedded Resource Services. Intentionally left blank - Service have not been purchased.

A.33. Open Path System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.34 Open Eye Cloud Video Platform ("Open Eye Services"). Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.35 Sabre Systems Services. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.36 Cantronics Telethermographic Device. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.37. Digital Barriers Telethermographic System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.38. Installation and Lease Subscription Services for Evolv Express. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.39. Installation and Purchase Subscription Services for Evolv Express. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.40. Illustra Telethermographic System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.41. Wello Body Temperature Detection System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.42. ZKTECO Temperature System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.43. Milestone Video Surveillance Equipment. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.44. SES Mobile-Based Keyless Access Control System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.45. Solink Cloud Video Services. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.46. Qolsys Panel. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.47. GuardRFID. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.48. Purchase and Subscription Services for Motorola Concealed Weapons Detection System. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.49. Installation and Subscription Services for Motorola Concealed Weapons Detection System. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.50. Additional Services. If any other services, including but not limited to the following, are being furnished under this Agreement, Customer and Johnson Controls will enter into a separate Rider that will be attached to and incorporated as part of this Agreement: (a) Select Link - Immediate Response Information System (IRIS) (b) Managed Access Control (c) Electronic Article Surveillance (“EAS”) (d) Guard Response Service (e) Radio Frequency Identification (“RFID”) (f) Training Services (g) Watchman’s Reporting Service.

B. Warranty (90-Day). 1. Any part of the System (as distinguished from the Firmware/Software) installed under this Agreement, including the wiring, which proves to be defective in material or workmanship within ninety (90) days of the date of completion of the installation ("Warranty Period"), will be repaired or replaced, at in Johnson Controls' option with a new or functionally operative part. Materials required to repair or replace such defective components will be furnished at no charge during the Warranty Period. Warranty Services will be furnished during Johnson Control's "Normal Working Hours" (between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday, except holidays). Warranty Service performed outside of these hours is subject to additional charges.

3. The following “Conditions” are not covered by Warranty: (a) damage or extra service time needed resulting from accidents, acts of God, lightning, strikes, riots, floods, terrorism, acts of War, alteration, misuse, tampering or abuse, adjustments, repairs or maintenance not performed by Johnson Controls, or from parts, equipment, accessories, attachments or other devices not furnished by Johnson Controls; (b) Customer’s failure to properly follow operating instructions provided by Johnson Controls or OEM; (c) adjustments necessitated by misalignment of video cameras, improper adjustment of monitor brightness and contrast tuning dials or insufficient light on the area viewed by the camera(s); (d) trouble due to interruption of Internet, telecommunications, and/or electrical service; (e) battery failure; (f) devices designed to fail in protecting the equipment/system, such as, but not limited to, fuses and circuit breakers; and (g) System modifications/customization requested by Customer. If Customer calls Johnson Controls for Warranty Service and Johnson Controls’ representative finds that one of the “Conditions” has led to the inoperability or apparent inoperability of the Equipment/System or any component, Johnson Controls may bill Customer for the service call whether or not Johnson Controls actually works on the Equipment/System. If repairs are required due to one of the above "Conditions”, Johnson Controls will charge Customer for such work on a time and materials basis at Johnson Controls' then applicable rates for labor and materials.

4. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE CUSTOMER’S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WITH RESPECT TO ANY AND ALL LOSSES OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING JOHNSON CONTROLS' NEGLIGENCE, IS REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. JOHNSON

CONTROLS WILL IN NO EVENT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR

PERSONAL INJURY OR DAMAGES TO PROPERTY, HOWEVER OCCASIONED, WHETHER ALLEGED AS RESULTING FROM BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT BY JOHNSON CONTROLS OR NEGLIGENCE OF JOHNSON CONTROLS OR OTHERWISE. Johnson Controls makes no and specifically disclaims all representations or warranties that the services, products, software or third party product or software will be secure from cyber threats, hacking or other similar malicious activity, or will detect the presence of, or eliminate, treat, or mitigate the spread transmission, or outbreak of any pathogen, disease, virus or other contagion, including but not limited to COVID 19.

5. Unless agreed to in writing by the parties, any technical support, assistance, or advice (“Technical Support”) provided by JOHNSON CONTROLS, such as suggestions as to design use and suitability of the Equipment and products for the Customer’s application, is provided in good faith, but Customer acknowl edges and agrees that JOHNSON CONTROLS is not the designer, engineer, or installer of record. Any Technical Support is provided for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as a representation or warranty, express or implied, concerning the proper selection, use, and/or application of the Equipment and products. Customer assumes exclusive responsibility for determining if the equipment and products supplied by JOHNSON CONTROLS are suitable for its intended application and all risk and liability, whether based in contract, tort or otherwise, in connection with its application and use of the equipment and products.

C. System Requirements, Miscellaneous. 1. Vaults. Customer must ensure that any Customer vault protected by sound or vibration detector systems has the minimum construction characteristics prescribed by the Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc. 2. System Testing. Customer must test all detection devices or other electronic equipment according to procedures prescribed by Johnson Controls prior to setting the alarm system for closed periods and must notify Johnson Controls promptly if such equipment fails to respond to any such test. 3.

Familiarization Period. UNLESS CUSTOMER HAS REJECTED THE FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD (EXCEPT WHERE A FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD IS REQUIRED BY LAW), CUSTOMER AGREES THAT: (a) DURING A FIVE (5) DAY FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD, OR SUCH PERIOD AS IS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND (b) FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE

INSTALLATION AND THE COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTION TO JOHNSON CONTROLS' CMC (AND DURING ANY APPLICABLE EXTENSIONS), JOHNSON CONTROLS HAS NO OBLIGATION TO, AND WILL NOT, RESPOND TO ANY ALARM SIGNAL RECEIVED AT THE JOHNSON CONTROLS' CMC FROM CUSTOMER’S PREMISES DURING SUCH FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD. CUSTOMER ALSO AGREES THAT DURING SUCH PERIOD JOHNSON CONTROLS HAS NO OBLIGATION TO, AND WILL NOT, NOTIFY ANY AUTHORITIES, CUSTOMER, OR A PERSON ON CUSTOMER’S EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST, OR TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION WITH REGARD TO ANY ALARM SIGNAL JOHNSON CONTROLS RECEIVES, EVEN IF DUE TO AN ACTUAL EMERGENCY EVENT. 4. Special Equipment Requirements. If Customer requires installation or service of equipment in areas inaccessible without the use of lifts or cranes, or if non-standard conditions at the Customer site require special equipment for installation or service, Customer will provide such equipment, or will reimburse Johnson Controls for any applicable charges or fees. 5. Training Services. Johnson Controls provides initial training to Customer on use of the equipment installed at the time of installation. Thereafter, Customer may purchase additional training in one-hour increments at Johnson Controls’ then current rate. 6. Site Preparation, Intrusion and Restoration.

Unless otherwise noted herein, Customer is responsible for providing: (a) any necessary electric current, (b) an outlet within 10 feet of an alarm control panel, (c) telephone connections, (d) network drops, and (e) any required conduit, wiremold, or other raceway, (f) any required IP address assignments, and (g) additional network software licensing. The installation of the equipment/system may necessarily require cutting, bolting or fastening into Customer's floors, walls and/or ceilings. Johnson Controls shall not be responsible for any expenses related to intrusion, mold, fungi, bacteria, wet/dry rot, patching, floor or wall finishing, or paint, tile, carpet or wallpaper matching, restoration or replacement resulting from installation or service of the equipment/system. 7. Battery Powered Devices. Customer understands that any battery-powered motion detectors, smoke detectors, door and window contact transmitters and other detection sensors installed/serviced under this Agreement require batteries to operate. THESE BATTERY-POWERED DETECTION SENSORS WILL NOT OPERATE, AND THE ALARM WILL NOT SOUND, IF THE BATTERY ENERGY LEVEL OR CHARGE IS LOW, OR DEPLETED. It is Customer’s sole responsibility to maintain and replace any batteries. Customer shall

Page 9 of 22 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

carefully read and follow the owner’s manual, instructions and warnings for all such equipment and regularly inspect the sensors for dirt and dust buildup and test the sensors weekly to help maintain continued operation. 8. Customer is solely responsible for the establishment, operation, maintenance, access, security and other aspects of its computer network (“Network”) and shall supply Johnson Controls secure Network access for providing its services. Products networked, connected to the internet, or otherwise connected to computers or other devices must be appropriately protected by Customer and/or end user against unauthorized access. Customer is responsible to take appropriate measures, including performing back-ups, to protect information, including without limit data, software, or files (collectively “Data”) prior to receiving the service or products.

D. Electronic Media; Personal Information; Consent to Call, Text or Email. 1.Electronic Media. Either party may scan, fax, email, image, or otherwise convert this Agreement into an electronic format of any type or form, now known or developed in the future. Any unaltered or unadulterated copy of this Agreement produced from such an electronic format will be legally binding upon the parties and equivalent to the original for all purposes, including litigation. Johnson Controls may rely upon Customer’s assent to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, if Customer has signed this Agreement or has demonstrated its intent to be bound whether by electronic signature or otherwise. 2. Personal Information. Customer represents and warrants that Customer has obtained all consents and has the right to (a) disclose to Johnson Controls all personal information disclosed hereunder concerning individuals/employees/or other third parties including all information contained in Customer’s Emergency Call List (“ECL”); (b) permit Johnson Controls to collect (including consent to record telephone conversations with Johnson Controls), use, disclose and transfer such personal information; and (c) expressly authorizes Johnson Controls to use such personal information to administer the relationship and the agreement between Customer and Johnson Controls, including, but not limited to, contacting Customer personnel at the telephone numbers and/or email addresses provided: (i) using SMS, text, prerecorded messages, or automated calling devices to deliver messages to set/confirm a service/installation appointment; and/or (ii) to provide information or offers about products and services of interest to Customer. Customer acknowledges and agrees that Johnson Controls may share all such information with its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and its/their successor corporations or any subcontractor or assignee, within and outside the country in which the Customer is located and thereby subject such information to the laws of such countries.

E. Limitation of Liability. 1. Johnson Controls is not an insurer. The amounts Johnson Controls charges Customer are not insurance premiums. Such charges are based upon the value of the Services, System and Equipment provided and are unrelated to the value of Customer's property, the property of others located in Customer's premises, or any risk of loss on Customer’s premises. 2. Johnson Controls’ services, systems and equipment do not cause and cannot eliminate occurrences of the events they are intended to detect or avert. Johnson Controls MAKES NO GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, THAT THE SERVICES, SYSTEM OR EQUIPMENT SUPPLIED WILL DETECT OR AVERT SUCH EVENTS OR THE CONSEQUENCES THEREFROM. Accordingly, Johnson Controls and its suppliers do not undertake any risk that Customer’s person or property, or the person or property of others, may be subject to injury or loss if such an event occurs. The allocation of such risk remains with Customer, not Johnson Controls nor its suppliers. Insurance, if any, covering such risk shall be obtained by Customer. Neither of Johnson Controls nor its suppliers shall have any liability for loss, damage or injury due directly or indirectly to events, or the consequences therefrom, which the System or Services are intended to detect or avert. Customer shall look exclusively to its insurer and not to Johnson Controls or its suppliers to pay Customer in the event of any such loss, damage or injury. Customer releases and waives for itself and its insurer all subrogation and other rights to recover from Johnson Controls and its suppliers arising as a result of paying any claim for loss, damage or injury of Customer or another person.

3. If notwithstanding the provisions of this Section E, Johnson Controls and/or one or more of its suppliers are found liable for loss, damage or injury under any legal theory due to a failure of the Services, System or Equipment in any respect, the liability of Johnson Controls and its suppliers shall be limited to a sum equal to 10% of the Annual Service Charge or $1,000, whichever is greater, as agreed upon damages and not as a penalty, as Customer’s sole remedy. This will be the sole remedy because it is impractical and extremely difficult to determine the actual damages, if any, which may result from Johnson Controls’ or its suppliers’ failure to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement. If Customer requests, Johnson Controls may assume greater liability by attaching a Rider to this Agreement stating the extent of Johnson Controls’ additional liability and the additional charges Customer will pay for Johnson Controls’ assumption of such greater liability. However, such additional charges are not insurance premiums and Johnson Controls is not an insurer even if it enters into such a Rider.

4. The provisions of this Section E shall apply no matter how the loss, damage or injury or other consequence occurs, even if due to Johnson Controls’ or its suppliers’ performance or nonperformance of their respective obligations under this Agreement or from negligence, active or otherwise, strict liability, violation of any applicable consumer protection law or any other alleged fault on the part of Johnson Controls, its suppliers, agents or employees.

If any other person, including Customer’s subrogating insurer, makes any claim or files any lawsuit against Johnson Controls or its suppliers in any way relating to the Services, System or Equipment that are the subjects of this Agreement, then Customer shall indemnify and hold Johnson Controls and its suppliers harmless from any and all such claims and lawsuits including the payment of all damages, expenses, costs and attorneys' fees.

5. No suit or action shall be brought against Johnson Controls or its suppliers, agents, employees, subsidiaries, affiliates or parents (both direct and indirect) more than one year after the incident that resulted in the loss, injury or damage occurred. Except as provided for herein, Johnson Controls’ claims must also be brought within one year. Claims not subject to the one- year limitation include claims for unpaid: (1) contract amounts, (2) change order amounts (approved or requested) and (3) delays and/or work inefficiencies. 6. The provisions of this Section E shall apply to and benefit Johnson Controls and its agents, employees, contractors, subsidiaries, affiliates, parents (both direct and indirect), vendors, suppliers and affinity marketers. If this Agreement provides for a direct connection to a municipal police or fire department or other organization, then that department or other organization may also invoke the provisions of this Section E against any claims due to any failure of such department or organization. Johnson Controls and its suppliers are not responsible for the preservation of any computer programs or data and Customer is responsible for maintaining adequate back-ups.

F. Other Charges; Remedies; Termination. 1. There may be a service charge to Customer for cancelled installation/service appointments if Customer cancels less than 24-hours prior to dispatch, or if Johnson Controls’ representative is sent to the Customer’s premises in response to a service call for false alarm or System malfunction caused by Customer’s operation contrary to instructions, failure to close or properly secure a window, door or other protected point, or improper adjustment of monitors or accessory components. 2. Customer acknowledges and agrees that timely payments of the full amounts listed on invoices is an essential term of this Agreement and that Customer’s failure to make payment in full when due is a material breach of this Agreement. Customer further acknowledges that if there is any amount outstanding on an invoice, it is material to Johnson Controls and shall give Johnson Controls, in addition to any other available remedies, the right to, without notice, (a) suspend, discontinue or terminate performing any Services and/or withhold further deliveries of equipment and other materials, terminate or suspend any unpaid software licenses, and/or suspend Johnson Controls’ obligations under or terminate this Agreement and (b) to charge interest on the amounts that remain unpaid more than thirty (30) days past the due date specified in the invoice(s) at a rate equal to the lesser of 1.5% per month or the maximum rate permitted under applicable law, until payment is made in full. Customer agrees to pay all costs, expenses and fees of Johnson Controls’ enforcement of this Agreement, including collection expenses, court costs, and attorneys’ fees. Johnson Controls’ election to continue providing future Services does not, in any way, diminish Johnson Controls’ right to terminate or suspend Services or exercise any or all rights or remedies under this Agreement. Johnson Controls shall not be liable for any damages, claims, expenses or liabilities arising from or relating to suspension of services for non-payment. In the event that there are exigent circumstances requiring Services or Johnson Controls otherwise performs Services at the premises following suspension, those Services shall be governed by the terms of this Agreement unless a separate contract is executed. If Customer disputes any late payment notice or Johnson Controls’ efforts to collect payment, Customer shall immediately notify Johnson Controls in writing and explain the basis of the dispute. In the event of Customer’s default, the balance of any outstanding amounts will be immediately due and payable. Installation Charge(s) are based on Johnson Controls performing the installation with its own personnel. If for any reason installation must be performed by outside contractors, Installation Charge(s) may be subject to revision. 3.In addition to any other remedies available to Johnson Controls, Johnson Controls may terminate this Agreement and discontinue any Service(s) if (a) Johnson Controls' CMC is substantially damaged by fire or catastrophe or if Johnson Controls is unable to obtain any connections or privileges required to transmit signals between the Customer's premises, Johnson Controls' CMC or the Municipal Fire or Police Department or other first responder; (b) Customer fails to follow Johnson Controls’ recommendations for the repair or replacement of defective parts of the System not covered under the Warranty or QSP Service; (c) Customer's failure to follow the operating instructions provided by Johnson Controls results in an undue number of false alarms or System malfunction; (d) in Johnson Controls’ sole opinion, the premises in which the System is installed are unsafe, unsuitable, or so modified or altered after installation as to render continuation of Service(s) impractical or impossible; (e) If Johnson Controls’ performance of its obligations becomes impracticable due to obsolescence or unavailability of systems, Equipment, or products (including component parts and/or materials) or because Johnson Controls or its supplier(s) has discontinued the manufacture or the sale of the Equipment and/or products or is no longer in the business of providing the Services; (f) Johnson Controls is unable to obtain or continue to support technologies, TeleCom Services, or Communication Facilities; (g) changes in applicable law; or (h) Customer fails to make payments when due or otherwise breaches this Agreement. Johnson Controls will not be liable for any damages or subject to any penalty as a result of any such termination. Johnson Controls may terminate this Agreement, or the affected portions, at its sole discretion upon notice to the Customer if Johnson Controls’ performance of its obligations are prohibited because of changes in applicable laws, regulations or codes.

G. Hazardous Materials. For all projects except those involving new construction, Customer represents and warrants that to the best of Customer’s knowledge the work site is free of any hazardous materials. The term “hazardous materials” includes but is not be limited to asbestos, asbestos-containing material, polychlorinated biphenyl (“PCB”), formaldehyde or other potentially toxic or otherwise hazardous material. If any such substance is discovered on the work site, Johnson Controls will not be required to install or service the Equipment at such site unless and until Customer certifies the removal or safe containment of such hazardous materials. Customer shall indemnify, defend, and hold Johnson Controls, its officers, directors, agents, and vendors harmless from any damages, claims, injuries, liabilities resulting from the exposure of Johnson Controls’ employees, contractors, or subcontractors to hazardous materials at the work site; provided, however, that the foregoing provision will not apply when it has been determined that such hazardous materials were brought to the work site by

Page 10 of 22 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

Johnson Controls.

H. Waivers. 1.Waiver of Jury Trial. CUSTOMER AND JOHNSON CONTROLS BOTH AGREE TO WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY MANNER CONNECTED WITH OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT. 2.Mutual SAFETY Act Waiver. Certain of Johnson Controls’ systems and services have received Certification and/or Designation as Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technologies (“QATT”) under the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. §§ 441-444 (the “SAFETY Act”). As required under 6 C.F.R. 25.5 (e), to the maximum extent permitted by law, Johnson Controls and Customer hereby agree to waive their right to make any claims against the other for any losses, including business interruption losses, sustained by either party or their respective employees, resulting from an activity resulting from an “Act of Terrorism” as defined in 6 C.F.R. 25.2, when QATT have been deployed in defense against, response to, or recovery from such Act of Terrorism.

I. Miscellaneous. 1. Enforceability. If any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

2. Paragraph and Section Headings; Captions; Counterparts. The headings and captions contained in this Agreement are inserted for convenience or reference only, and are not to be deemed part of or to be used in construing this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such separate counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same agreement. 3. FARs. Johnson Controls supplies “commercial items” within the meaning of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), 48 CFR Parts 1-53. As to any customer order for a U.S. Government contract, Johnson Controls will comply only with those mandatory flow-downs for commercial item and commercial services subcontracts listed either at FAR 52.244-6, or 52.212-5(e)(1), as applicable. 4. Export Control. Customer shall not export or re-export, directly or indirectly, any: (i) product or service provided under this Agreement; (ii) technical data; (iii) software; (iv) information; or (v) items acquired under this Agreement to any country for which the United States Government (or any agency thereof) requires an export license or other approval without first obtaining any licenses, consents or permits that may be required under the applicable laws of the U.S. or other foreign jurisdictions, including the Export Administration Act and Regulations and shall incorporate in all export shipping documents the applicable destination control statements. Customer shall, at its own expense, defend, indemnify and save Johnson Controls harmless from and against all third-party claims, liability, loss or damage (including attorneys' fees and other defense costs), assessed against or suffered by Johnson Controls as a result of an allegation or claim of noncompliance by Customer with this Section. The obligations contained in this Section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5. Insurance. Johnson Controls maintains comprehensive General Liability and Automobile Liability Insurance in amounts that meet or exceed: $1,000,000 per incident - $2,000,000 in the aggregate and Worker’s Compensation coverage as required by law. Johnson Controls will not be required to provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of any party, nor will Johnson Controls be required to designate any party as a statutory employer for any purposes.

6. Johnson Controls Brand. Without exception, Johnson Controls-branded Signage, including yard signs, window stickers and warning signs will remain the property of Johnson Controls and may be removed by Johnson Controls at any time. Customer’s right to display Johnson Controls-branded Signage is not transferable and ceases upon termination or expiration of this Agreement. 7. Resale. If Johnson Controls is connecting to a previously installed existing system, to the extent the previously installed existing system is Customer’s properly, it shall remain Customer’s property.

J. System Software; Network Connections. 1. Any software provided with the System or in connection with the Services is proprietary to Johnson Controls and/or Johnson Controls’ supplier(s) and is licensed or sublicensed to Customer on a non-exclusive basis. Customer may not (a) disclose the Software or source code to any third parties, (b) duplicate, reproduce, or copy all or any part of the Software, or (c) use the Software on equipment other than with the designated System with which it was furnished. A separate Software License Agreement or End User License Agreement between Johnson Controls and Customer and/or the software publisher may be required to use the software and/or obtain updates/upgrades. If the installed Equipment is to be connected to Customer’s computer network (“Network”), Johnson Controls will furnish and install the software needed to run the Equipment and will connect the Equipment to the Network according to the Network settings supplied by Customer. Installation shall not include modifications to the Network, security, or firewall settings. Customer will supply a TCP/IP Ethernet network address and central processing unit per Johnson Controls specifications for access control system operation. Johnson Controls shall not be responsible for the setup, operation, or maintenance of the Network or Network performance or compatibility issues. Johnson Controls may assess additional charges, if Johnson Controls is unable to connect to the Network or if any additional Equipment is required to facilitate connectivity between the Network and the Equipment. 2. Open Source Software. Johnson Controls represents and warrants to the end user of the System that, to the extent the System includes any Open Source Software, the internal use and operation of the System by the end user will not create any obligation on the part of the end user under the terms of any Open Source License (i) to make any source code or object code available to third parties, or (ii) to license, disclose or otherwise make available to third parties any proprietary software, data or other information, or any associated intellectual property. As used herein, the term “Open Source Software” means any software, program, module, code, library, database, driver or similar component (or portion thereof) that is royalty free, proprietary software, the use of which requires any contractual obligations by the user such as, without limitation, that software that is subject to, distributed, transmitted, licensed or otherwise made available under any of the following licenses: GNU General Public License, GNU Library or “Lesser” Public License, Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) license (including Free BSD and BSD-style licenses), MIT license, Mozilla Public License, IBM Public License, Apache Software License, Artistic license (e.g., PERL), Sun Industry Standards Source License, Sun Community Source License (SCSL), Intel Open Source License, Apple Public Source License, or any substantially similar license, or any license that has been approved by the Open Source Initiative, Free Software Foundation or similar group (collectively, “Open Source Licenses”).

K. Force Majeure. Johnson Controls assumes no liability for delays in installation of the Equipment or for the consequences therefrom, however caused. Johnson Controls shall not be liable, nor in breach or default of its obligations under this Agreement, for delays, interruption, failure to render services, or any other failure by Johnson Controls to perform an obligation under this Agreement, where such delay, interruption or failure is caused, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, by a Force Majeure Event. A “Force Majeure Event” is a condition or event that is beyond the reasonable control of Johnson Controls, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable, including, without limitation, acts of God, severe weather (including but not limited to hurricanes, tornados, severe snowstorms or severe rainstorms), wildfires, floods, earthquakes, seismic disturbances, or other natural disasters, acts or omissions of any governmental authority (including change of any applicable law or regulation), epidemics, pandemics, disease, viruses, quarantines, or other public health risks and/or responses thereto, condemnation, strikes, lock-outs, labor disputes, an increase of 5% or more in tariffs or other excise taxes for materials to be used on the project, fires, explosions or other casualties, thefts, vandalism, civil disturbances, insurrection, mob violence, riots, war or other armed conflict (or the serious threat of same), acts of terrorism, electrical power outages, interruptions or degradations in telecommunications, computer, network, or electronic communications systems, data breach, cyber-attacks, ransomware, unavailability or shortage of parts, materials, supplies, or transportation, or any other cause or casualty beyond the reasonable control of Johnson Controls. If Johnson Controls’ performance of the work is delayed, impacted, or prevented by a Force Majeure Event or its continued effects, Johnson Controls shall be excused from performance under the Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if Johnson Controls is delayed in achieving one or more of the scheduled milestones set forth in the Agreement due to a Force Majeure Event, Johnson Controls will be entitled to extend the relevant completion date by the amount of time that Johnson Controls was delayed as a result of the Force Majeure Event, plus such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of the delay. To the extent that the Force Majeure Event directly or indirectly increases Johnson Controls’ cost to perform the services, Customer is obligated to reimburse Johnson Controls for such increased costs, including, without limitation, costs incurred by Johnson Controls for additional labor, inventory storage, expedited shipping fees, trailer and equipment rental fees, subcontractor fees, compliance with vaccination requirements or other costs and expenses incurred by Johnson Controls in connection with the Force Majeure.

L. Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable by the Customer except upon written consent of Johnson Controls first being obtained. Johnson Controls shall have the right to assign this Agreement or to subcontract any of its obligations under this Agreement without notice to Customer.

M. Digital Enabled Services, Software and Hosted Software Services. If Johnson Controls provides Digital Enabled Services under this Agreement, these Digital Enabled Services require the collection, transfer and ingestion of building, equipment, system time series, and other data to Johnson Controls’ cloud-hosted software applications. Customer consents to and grants Johnson Controls right to collect, ingest and use such data to enable Johnson Controls and its affiliates and agents to provide, maintain, protect, develop and improve the Digital Enabled Services and Johnson Controls products and services. Customer acknowledges that, while Digital Enabled Services generally improve equipment performance and services, Digital Enabled Services do not prevent all potential malfunction, insure against all loss, or guarantee a certain level of performance. Customer shall be solely responsible for the establishment, operation, maintenance, access, security and other aspects of its computer network (“Network”), shall appropriately protect hardware and products connected to the Network and will supply Johnson Controls secure Network access for providing its Digital Enabled Services. As used herein, "Digital Enabled Services" mean services provided hereunder that employ Johnson Controls software and related equipment installed at Customer facilities and Johnson Controls cloud-hosted software offerings and tools to improve, develop, and enable such services.

Digital Enabled Service may include, but are not limited to, (a) remote servicing and inspection, (b) advanced equipment fault detection and diagnostics, and (c) data dashboarding and health reporting. If Customer accesses and uses Software that is used to provide the Digital Enabled Services, the Software Terms (defined below) will govern such access and use.

Johnson Controls Digital Solutions. Use, implementation, and deployment of the software and hosted software products (“Software”) offered under these terms shall be subject to, and governed Johnson Controls’ standard terms for such Software and Software related professional services in effect from time to time at www.johnsoncontrols.com/techterms (collectively, the “Software Terms”). Specifically, the Johnson Controls General EULA set forth at www.johnsoncontrols.com/buildings/legal/digital/generaleula governs access to and use of software installed on Customer’s premises or systems and the Johnson Controls Terms of Service set forth at www.johnsoncontrols.com/buildings/legal/digital/generaltos govern access to and use of hosted software products. The applicable Software Terms are incorporated herein by this reference. Other than the right to use the Software as set forth in the Software Terms, Johnson Controls and its licensors reserve all right, title, and interest (including all intellectual property rights) in and to the Software and improvements to the Software. The Software that is licensed hereunder is licensed subject to the Software Terms and not sold. If there is a conflict between the other terms herein and the Software Terms, the Software Terms shall take precedence and govern with respect to rights and responsibilities relating to the Software, its implementation and deployment and any improvements thereto.

Page 11 of 22 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, unless otherwise agreed, the following terms apply to Software that is provided to Customer on a subscription basis (i.e., a time limited license or use right), (each a “Software Subscription”): Each Software Subscription provided hereunder will commence on the date the initial credentials for the Software are made available (the “Subscription Start Date”) and will continue in effect until the expiration of the subscription term noted in the applicable statement of work, order or other applicable ordering document . At the expiration of the Software Subscription, such Software Subscription will automatically renew for consecutive one (1) year terms (each a “Renewal Subscription Term”), unless either party provides the other party with a notice of non-renewal at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Software Subscriptions purchases are non-cancelable, and the sums paid nonrefundable. Fees for Software Subscriptions shall be paid annually in advance, invoiced on the Subscription Start Date and each subsequent anniversary thereof. Customer shall pay all invoiced amounts within thirty calendar days after the date of invoice. Payments not made within such time period shall be subject to late charges as set forth in the Software Terms. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, the subscription fee for each Renewal Subscription Term will be priced at Johnson Controls' then-applicable list price for that Software offering. Any use of Software that exceeds the scope, metrics or volume set forth in this Agreement and applicable SOW will be subject to additional fees based on the date such excess use began.

N. Privacy. 1. Johnson Controls as Processor: Where Johnson Controls factually acts as Processor of Personal Data (as defined therein) on behalf of Customer, the terms at www.johnsoncontrols.com/dpa shall apply. 2. Johnson Controls as Controller: Johnson Controls will collect, process and transfer certain personal data of Customer and its personnel related to the business relationship between it and Customer (for example names, email addresses, telephone numbers) as controller and in accordance with Johnson Controls’ Privacy Notice at https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/privacy. Customer acknowledges Johnson Controls’ Privacy Notice and strictly to the extent consent is mandatorily required under applicable law, Customer consents to such collection, processing and transfer. To the extent consent to such collection, processing and transfer by Johnson Control is mandatorily required from Customer’s personnel under applicable law, Customer warrants and represents that it has obtained such consent.

O. Dispute Resolution: Johnson Controls shall have the sole and exclusive right to determine whether any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to the Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be submitted to a court of law or arbitrated. The laws of Delaware shall govern the validity, enforceability, and interpretation of this Agreement, without regard to conflicts of law principles thereof, and the exclusive venue for any such litigation or arbitration shall be in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The parties waive any objection to the exclusive jurisdiction of the specified forums, including any objection based on forum non conveniens. In the event the matter is submitted to a court, Johnson Controls and Customer hereby agree to waive their right to trial by jury. In the event the matter is submitted to arbitration by Johnson Controls, the costs of arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties, and the arbitrator’ s award may be confirmed and reduced to judgment in any court of competent jurisdiction. Except as provided below, no claim or cause of action, whether known or unknown, shall be brought by either party against the other more than one year after the claim first arose. Claims not subject to the one-year limitation include claims for unpaid: (1) contract amounts, (2) change order amounts (approved or requested) and (3) delays and/or work inefficiencies. Customer will pay all of Johnson Controls' reasonable collection costs (including legal fees and expenses).

P. Johnson Controls License Information: AL 1498, 1499, 1500, 1501, 1502, A-0244, The Security Industry is governed by the rules and regulations of the Alabama Electronic Security Board of Licensure. If you would like information on these rules and regulations or would like to register a complaint you can contact the Board at: AESBL 7956 Vaughn Rd., Montgomery 36116, (334) 264-9388 Fax: 334-264-9332 AK 125516; 1058473, 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 7 Anchorage, AK 99507 AR 0000199, 0030740118 Regulated by Arkansas Bd. of Private Investigators & Private Security Agencies, #1 State Police Plaza Dr., Little Rock 72209, (501) 618-8600 AZ ROC281489, 18267-0 CA 977249; alarm company operators are licensed and regulated by the Bureau of Security & Investigative Services, Dept. of Consumer Affairs, Sacramento, CA 95814 CT 0106099-L5 DC ECS1327 FL EF20000890, EF20000341,EF0000478 GA LVA002833, LVA205386, LVU004635 HI CT-32427 ID PWC-C-12256-A-4, RCE-33602, EC012834 IL 127001526, 128000247, 128000246, 128000243 LA 24889, F523, F489 MA 401- C, MI 3601206912, A-0352, A-0170, 3602206914, A-0638, 3602206913, A-1058, A-1199 Whitcomb Avenue Madison Heights, MI 48071; MN TS651063 MS 15024088, 19530-SC NC 846- CSA, 28510-SP-FA/LV, 19385-SP-FA/LV, 27353-SP-FA/LV, 19718-SP-FA/LV, 24191-SP-FA/LV, 22850-SP-FA/LV 101 Industrial Drive, Ste 104 Raleigh, NC 27069, (919) 788-5320 NJ 34BF00050200, P00451, 607013 NM 375283 NV 0077542, F470, F469, NY 12000327404, Licensed by NYS Dept. of State OH E16782, 50 -18-1052, 50-25-1050, 50-48-1032, 50-57- 1119, 53-31-1582 OK AC-67 OR CLE-322, 197010, AC-67 PA Pennsylvania Home Improvement Contractor Registration Number; PA010083 RI 18004, AF-09170 TN ACC1704, ACC1705, ACC1707, ACC1708, ACC1709, ACC710, ACC1711 TX B00536, 4200 Buckingham Road Ste 150, Ft. Worth, TX 76115 – Dept of Public Safety, Private Security 5805 N. Lamar Blvd, Austin 78752, ACR-1460 UT 8390557-6501 VA 11-7587, 11-7575, 11-7591, 11-7573, 11-7589, 11-7578, 2705147765 WA JOHNSCS837N4, 19625 62nd Ave South, Ste C112 Kent, WA 98032 WV 050291. The foregoing list shows only those license numbers Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC (“Johnson Controls”) is required by law to include on marketing materials. A comprehensive list of licenses held by Johnson Controls is available on www.johnsoncontrols.com. California Customers Only: Upon completion of the installation of the alarm system, the alarm company shall thoroughly instruct the purchaser in the proper use of the alarm system. Failure by the licensee, without legal excuse, to substantially commence work within 20 days from the approximate date specified in the agreement when the work will begin is a violation of the Alarm Company Act.

©2023 JOHNSON CONTROLS. All rights reserved.

Page 12 of 22 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

COMMERCIAL SECURITY AS A SERVICE

AGREEMENT

TOWN NO.
0198-RIVERSIDE, CA

CUSTOMER NO.
119846407

JOB NO.

PO NO.

ESTIMATE NO.
1-82U2MMX

ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

DATE: 12/5/2023
Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC (“Johnson
Controls”)

Roland Gomez
2023 Chicago Ave,
Riverside, CA 92507
Tele. No. (951) 538-3409
City of Jurupa Valley
d/b/a: City Of Jurupa Valley
(“Customer”)
Customer Billing Information
8930 Limonite Ave,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn:

Tele. No.

Customer Premises Serviced
8930 Limonite Ave,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn:

Tele. No.

Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, Johnson Controls and Customer agree as follows:

Terms and Conditions
Johnson Controls agrees to waive the contract termination charges for a Customer location where Johnson Controls has failed to repair a System, which is partially or wholly inoperative due to faulty, damaged, or worn-out components. This waiver will apply only when Johnson Controls has failed to repair the system within sixty days of receipt of written notification. Upon receipt of a thirty (30) day notice to terminate, Johnson Controls will issue a credit or a refund for the service charges related to that service and affected location, during the period when the System was partially or wholly inoperative, but not to exceed one-hundred and twenty (120) days. Term = 5 Year Annual Service Charge – Initial Term. Johnson Controls agrees to honor the Annual Service Charge for Monitoring Services specified in this Agreement for the Initial Term of the Agreement. Thereafter, the Annual Service Charge may be increased by the increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners (“CPI-W”), All Items, U.S. City Average for the prior twelve (12) month period or 5%, whichever is less.

A/C Power. Customer will supply the necessary 110VAC power as required by Johnson Controls.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, except those expressly modified herein, shall remain in full force and effect.

_________________________________
Julie Brandt
President, Building Solutions, NA

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Julie Brandt, President, Building Solutions, purs uant to the authority vested in her by: (i) a Sub-Delegation of Authority from the President of Johnson Controls, Inc. , a Wisconsin corporation (“JCI” ), dated April 24, 2023, (ii) an Incumbency Certificate and Delegation of Authority from the general partner of Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP , a Delaware limited partnership (“ JCFP”), dated April 24, 2023, and (iii) a Written Consent in Lieu of Special Meeting of the Management Board from Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC , a Delaware limited liability company (“JCSS”), dated April 24, 2023, hereby authorizes:

Andrew Krynen
Vice President, Area General Manager

(the “
Delegate”) to perform, on behalf of each of JCI, JCFP and JCSS, the acts described below:

To execute and deliver any and all contracts for the performance of work, sale of goods, and furnishing of services, and any other instruments in connection therewith and in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with the current Global Approval Authority Matrix.

This authority does not extend to:

a. contracts without a (i) financial cap on liability, (ii) fault-based indemnity, and (iii) waiver of consequential damages, unless approved in accordance with the current Global Approval Authority Matrix; b. further sub-delegation of the above acts absent necessary approvals in writing; c. the execution of surety, performance or bid bonds;
d. the signing of any notes, contracts, or any other agreement to borrow money in the name of JCI, JCFP and JCSS, or any form of guaranty for the payment or performance of obligations of any subsidiary, affiliate, or joint venture of JCI, JCFP and JCSS; or
e. the signing, on behalf of JCI, JCFP and JCSS, of any deeds, abstracts, offers to purchase or any other instruments pertaining to the purchase or sale of real pro perty.

Any actions taken by such Delegate within the scope of acts authorized herein taken between the date of expiration of any prior delegation of authority and the date hereof are hereby rati fied, confirmed and approved as the acts and deeds of JCI, JCF P and JCSS.

This authority shall remain in full force and effect for one year from the date of issue unless earlier terminated by JCI, JCFP or JCSS or shall automatically terminate upon the end of Delegate ’s employment with any affiliated company of Johnson Controls International plc.

Signed at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 15 th day of May, 2023.

Johnson Controls, Inc. Johnson Controls ATTESTS:

Fire Protection LP, and Johnson Controls
Security Solutions LLC
______________________________________
Steve W. Keane

Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Johnson Controls, Inc.

______________________________________
Heather A. Brown

Vice President and Secretary
Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP

Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC

-1-

AGREEMENT FOR SECURITY SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY SOLUTIONS, LLC. FOR ACCESS

CONTROLS AT THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY HALL
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of February 1, 2024, between the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) and Johnson Controls Security Solutions, LLC, a Limited Liability Company (“Contractor”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

Term
This Agreement shall commence on February 1, 2024, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, but in no event later than January 31, 2029 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

Services
Contractor shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance, which is also set forth in Exhibit A. Any language in Exhibit A other than the services and tasks to be performed under this Agreement and the price and terms of payment for installation and service shall be null and void. The provisions of the Agreement shall control and supersede the language of Exhibit A.

Performance
Contractor shall at all-time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

Payment
The City agrees to cause Contractor to be paid annually, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit A. This amount shall not exceed Twenty-two Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars and Ten Cents ($22,353.10) during each fiscal year through the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.

Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council. -2-
Contractor shall submit invoices annually for services to be performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of the month, for services to be provided in the upcoming year. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor’s fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

A. Any language in Exhibit A other than the services and tasks to be performed under this Agreement and the price and terms of payment for installation and service shall be null and void. The provisions of the Agreement shall control and supersede the language of Exhibit A.

Suspension or Termination of Agreement Without Cause
The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.

In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.

Default Of Contractor
The Contractor’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.

If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
-3-

Ownership and Maintenance Of Documents
Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Contractor shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.

Indemnification.

B. Contractor shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) with respect to any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively, “Claims” hereinafter), including but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Contractor or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Contractor shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Contractor’s duty to defend pursuant to this Section shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

C. In no event, whether in contract, tort or otherwise (including breach of warranty, negligence and strict liability in tort), will either party be liable for indirect or consequential (including loss of business, loss of use, loss of profits, loss arising from delays, and the like), exemplary, punitive or special damages.
-4-

Insurance Requirements.

Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.

Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No.

CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.

Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.

Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker’s compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.

Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Contractor’s profession.

Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:

General Liability: Five million dollars ($5,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

Worker’s Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer’s Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate.

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000 unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
-5-

The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (“Additional Insured”) shall be covered as insured’s as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds.

For any claims related to this project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.

The Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.

Within one (1) business day following receipt by Contractor of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Contractor shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City’s forms, the Contractor’s insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

Modifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable the City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this section.

Independent Contractor
-6-

Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement.

Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

Legal Responsibilities
The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section.

Confidentiality; Release Of Information
All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City’s prior written authorization.

Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

Assignment
The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. City consents to the use of the sub-Contractors described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub-Contractors shall be borne by the Contractor and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.

General Provisions
-7-

Notices
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: Paul Toor, Public Works Director
To Contractor: Johnson Controls Security Solutions, LLC. 2023 Chicago Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Attention: Roland Gomez, Sales Agent

Licenses. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

Governing Law; Venue
The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.

Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court’s judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor’s sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor’s sub- Contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. -8-

Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

-9-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

Rod Butler
City Manager

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY
SOLUTIONS, LLC.

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]

Page 1 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of work shall be performed in accordance with Contractor’s proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Page 2 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

COMMERCIAL SECURITY AS A SERVICE

AGREEMENT
TOWN NO.
0198-RIVERSIDE, CA
CUSTOMER NO.
119846407
JOB NO. PO NO. ESTIMATE NO.
1-6UZGZLG

DATE: 11/21/2023
Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC (“Johnson
Controls”)
Roland Gomez
2023 Chicago Ave,
Riverside, CA 92507
Tele. No. (951) 538-3409
City of Jurupa Valley
d/b/a: City Of Jurupa Valley
(“Customer”)
Customer Billing Information
8930 Limonite Ave,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn:

Tele. No.

Customer Premises Serviced
8930 Limonite Ave,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn:

Tele. No.

This Commercial Security as a Service Agreement is between Customer and Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC (“Johnson Controls”) effective as of the date signed by Customer. By entering into this Agreement, Johnson Controls and Customer agree to the Terms and Conditions contained in this Agreement. The Equipment and/or Services, collectively the System(s) covered under this Agreement is/are listed in the attached Schedule(s) of Protection / Scope of Work (“SOW”). This offer shall be void if not accepted in writing within thirty (30) days from the date first set forth above.

I. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS AGREEMENT AND ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
(a) Hazardous Substance Checklist and Customer Letter
(b) Scope of Work / Schedule(s) of Protection
(c) Terms and Conditions
(d) Additional Terms and Conditions
(e) State Specific Forms, if applicable (e.g., local permit applications) (f) Customer Installation Acceptance Form (specific to Equipment/Services purchased) (g) If multiple locations, see attached schedule

II. CHARGES AND FEES; TAXES:
a. Installation Charge. Upon acceptance of this Agreement, Customer agrees to pay the installation charge outlined in the Scope of Work/Schedule of Protection plus applicable “Fees” and “Taxes” as defined below (“Installation Charge”)and as a precondition to activation of system and, if applicable, connection to Johnson Controls Central Monitoring Center (“CMC”) or any other Service(s). Any changes in the Statement of Work/Schedule of Protection made by the Customer after execution of this Agreement must be agreed to by Johnson Controls and Customer in writing and may be subject to additional charges, fees and/or taxes. Any additional equipment ordered by Customer by e-mail or telephone order shall be subject to terms and conditions of the Agreement and may be subject to shipping, handling, and/or restocking fees. Equipment becomes the property of Customer on payment of the Installation Payment Charge in full and Customer grants to Johnson Controls a security interest in the Equipment until this time.
b. Services. Customer agrees to pay Service Charges per annum set forth in the Scope of Work/Schedule of Protection (the “Annual Service Charges”), payable in advance on a(n) Quarterly basis unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing plus applicable Taxes for 5 year(s) (the “Initial Term”) effective from the date such Service is operative under this Agreement.. After the Initial Term this Agreement shall automatically renew on a/an Annual basis. Johnson Controls will provide Customer with notice of any adjustments in the Charges, Fees and/or Taxes applicable to the renewal period no later than forty-five (45) days prior to the commencement of the renewal period. Unless terminated by either party upon written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the anniversary date, the adjusted Charges, Fees and/or Taxes will be the Charges, Fees and/or Taxes for the renewal period. Johnson Controls shall have the right to increase Annual Service Charge(s) after one (1) year and, notwithstanding any other term in this Agreement, Johnson Controls may increase prices upon notice to Customer to reflect increases in material and labor costs. For termination prior to the end of the Initial Term, Customer agrees to pay, in addition to any outstanding Fees and charges for Service(s) rendered prior to termination 90% of the Annual Service Charge(s) remaining to be paid for the unexpired term of the Agreement as liquidated damages but not as a penalty. c. Other Charges. Customer agrees to pay any assessments, taxes, fees or charges imposed by any governmental body, telephone, communication, or signal transmission company such as false alarm, permitting or connection fees, or administration fees or service charges assessed by Johnson Controls related to AHJ requirements and/or changes to applicable laws, the need to reprogram alarm controls/devices to comply with area code, signal transmission, numbering or other changes relating to the installed Eq uipment and/or Service(s) provided under this Agreement ( “Fees”).

Customer is solely responsible to pay all applicable sales, use and/or similar taxes imposed by any taxing or governmental au thority on the Equipment, System and/or Services provided hereunder (“Taxes”) unless Customer provides to Johnson Controls a valid tax exemption certificate authorized by an appropriate taxing authority. If Customer fails to provide a valid tax exemption certificate, Customer shall remain liable for the payment of any such Taxes until paid in full. d. Invoicing. Pricing is based upon the billing and payment terms set forth in this Agreement. Invoices for the Installation Payment Charge are due upon receipt and for the Annual Service Charge are due within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice unless otherwise specified on the i nvoice. Invoices will be delive red and are to be paid via ACH Bank transfer. Johnson Controls ACH/EFT bank transfer details will be provided once the Agreement is signed and agreed to by the parties. Disputed invoices must be identified in writing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of invoice. Payment of any disputed amounts is due and payable upon resolution. Payment is a condition precedent to Johnson Controls’ obligation to perform Services under this Agreement. Charges for Equipment and material covered by this Agreement do not include any amounts for changes in tariffs, duties or other similar charges imposed and/or enacted.

III. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE: This Agreement, together with all of its written Amendments, Riders, Scope of Work an d/or Exhibits, constitutes the entire agreement between the Customer and Johnson Controls relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or w ritten agreements and understandin gs. The terms and conditions of this Agreement will prevail over any conflicting, inconsistent or additional terms and/or conditions contained in any purchase order, agreement, or other document issued by Customer. In signing this Agreement, Customer is not relying on any advice, advertisements, or oral representations of Johnson Controls and agrees to be bound to the terms and conditions contained in a ll the pages of the Agreement. Customer agrees that any representation, promise, condition, inducement or warranty, express or impl i ed, not included in this Agreement will not be binding upon Johnson Controls, and that the terms and conditions in this Agreement apply as printed without alteration or qualification, except as specifi cally modified by a written agreement signed by Johnson Controls and Customer. Any changes in the Statement of Work or scope of the work requested by the Customer after the execution of this Agreement may result in additional cost to the Customer and any such changes/additions must be authorized in a writing signed by both the Customer and Johnson Controls. Customer’s failure to accept and sign this Agreement within thirty (30) days of the date shown above may result in price increases. Customer acknowledges that: (a) Johnson Controls has explained the full range of protection, equipment, and services available to Customer; (b) additional protection over and above that provided herein is available and may be obtained from Johnson Controls at an additional cost to the Customer; (c) Customer desires and has con tracted for only the Equipment and/or Service(s) itemized in this Agreement; (d) the Equipment/Service(s) specified in this Agreement are for Customer’s own use and not for the benefit of any third party; (e) Customer owns the premises in which the Equipment is being installed or has the authority to engage Johnson Controls to carry out the installation in the premises; and (f) Customer will comply with all laws, codes and regulations pertaining to the use of the Equipment/Service(s).

ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE WARRANTY, LIMIT OF LIABILITY AND OTHER CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE SECTIONS ENTITLED “TERMS AND CONDITIONS” AND “ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS”. THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES FINAL APPROVAL OF A JOHNSON CONTROLS AUTHORIZED MANAGER BEFORE ANY EQUIPMENT/SERVICES MAY BE PROVIDED. IF APPROVAL IS DENIED, THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE TERMINATED AND JOHNSON CONTROLS ONLY OBLIGATION TO CUSTOMER WILL BE TO NOTIFY CUSTOMER OF SUCH TERMINATION AND REFUND ANY AMOUNTS PAID IN ADVANCE.

[Signature Follow on Next Page]

Page 3 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

COMMERCIAL SECURITY AS A SERVICE

AGREEMENT
TOWN NO.
0198-RIVERSIDE, CA
CUSTOMER NO.
119846407
JOB NO. PO NO. ESTIMATE NO.
1-6UZGZLG

Page 4 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

COMMERCIAL SECURITY AS A SERVICE

AGREEMENT
TOWN NO.
0198-RIVERSIDE, CA
CUSTOMER NO.
119846407
JOB NO. PO NO. ESTIMATE NO.
1-6UZGZLG

SCOPE OF WORK / SCHEDULE OF PROTECTION
IV. SCOPE OF WORK / SCHEDULE OF PROTECTION (“SOW”): Johnson Controls agrees to install or cause to be installed the Equipment and furnish the Service(s), collectively, the System, on the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement.

A. Technology Refresh for Security as a Service:

(ii) Within six (6) months prior to the termination date of the Initial Term of this Agreement, the customer may notify Johns on Controls to replace such Equipment with similar or substantially similar equipment sold as c urrent technology by Johnson Controls at the time the Equipment is replaced as part of a technology refresh and/or upgrade. S uch Equipment will be replaced by Johnson Controls at no additional charge to the Customer provided the Customer agrees to extend the Initial Terms of this Agreement for an additional 5 years. Customer will be responsible for paying the Installation Charge and additional service fees for any add-ons, wiring changes, or other charges required beyond the replacement of the substantially similar Equipment.

B. Services to be Provided (“Services”)

Alarm monitoring and Notification Services: No Service Selected Video Surveillance Services: No Service Selected
Managed Access Control Services: No Service Selected
Video Equipment: Closed Circuit Television PROVIDED
Maintenance Service Plan; Preventive Maintenance/Inspection: Expert Maintenance PROVIDED / Inspections NOT PROVIDED Additional Services: No Service Selected

C. Equipment to be Installed (“Equipment”): Johnson Controls will install, or cause to be installed, the Equipment (or equivalent), as set forth in this SOW in Customer’s designated facility(ies).

As used herein, “installation” means: (i) affixing all Equipment and materials provided by Johnson Controls at such locations within the facility(ies) as are designated by Customer; (ii) providing and pulling cables/wires required to connect the Equipment to Customer’s Communications Facilities and making such connections; (iii), in the cas e of a Digital Communicator installation, mount Equipment and plug into RJ31X phone jack previously installed by Customer; (iv) in the case of radio installation, mount radio Equipment and program Equipment with number furnished by Customer; (v) providing and installing software/firmware required by the Equipment; (vi) performing testing as required to establish that the Johnson Con trols Equipment is connected, is functioning according to its specifications, and is communicating over Customer’s Communications F acilities; and (vii) providing user-level training to Customer’s designated representative in the use of such Equipment.

Qty Product Name Location
1 TO BE INSTALLED:
1 NETWORK VIDEO RECORDER, 2U, 4 IP CHANNELS, WINDOWS 10, HDMI, DVI-I 2 COMMERCIAL ( 0 C - 50 C ) UNMANAGED ETHERNET POE SWITCH WITH 8 16 PROMO - ENTERPRISE IP CAMERA LICENSE, PER CAMERA
1 RAID AND OS ON RAID OPTION FOR 2U FRONT LOAD A-SERIES SERVERS.

NOT FIELD

1 A-SERIES UPGRADE TO I7 CPU. NOT FIELD UPGRADEABLE. AVAILABLE AT TIME 1 A-SERIES UPGRADE TO 16GB MEMORY TOTAL. NOT FIELD UPGRADEABLE. 1 Illustra Pro Gen4 32MP Multisensor, 3.6-11mm, AI, TDN w/IR, TWDR, IP66, IK10, SD 1 Illustra Pro Gen4 20MP Multisensor, 2.7-13.5mm, AI, TDN w/IR, TWDR, IP66, IK10, 7 Illustra Flex Gen4 8MP MiniDome, 3.6-11mm, Outdoor, IP67, IK10, TDN w/IR, TWDR 1 Illustra Flex Gen4 10MP Dual Sensor, MFZ 3.42-6.85mm, Edge AI, TWDR, TDN w/IR, I 10 Illustra Flex Gen4 8MP MiniDome, 3.6-11mm, Outdoor, IP67, IK10, TDN w/IR, TWDR 1 Lift Rental
1 Install All New Cameras Per Site Walk and Layout. Test for Proper Operation 3 90w PoE Injector
2 Illustra Pro Gen4 Multisensor Pendant Cap
1 Illustra Flex Gen4 Dual Sensor Pendant Mount
3 Mount, Wall, For Ultra & Optima Outdoor Dome, 11 inches 3 POLE STRAP ADAPTER
1 All Necessary Wiring, Camera Mounting Poles, AC Power at POE Switch Locations Provided for Tyco/JCI

Page 5 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)
D. CHARGES AND ESTIMATED TAX:

1. Installation Charge for Security as a Service

Installation Charge (Pre-Tax): $0.00
* Estimated Tax(es): $0.00
Total Installation Charge with Tax: $0.00
Amount Due at Signing: $0.00

2. Annual Service Charge:

Annual Charge Amount (Pre-tax): $22,353.10
* Estimated Tax(es): $0.00
ANNUAL CHARGE: $22,353.10
* Tax value shown is estimated and may differ from the actual tax value that will be on the invoice.

E. Scope of Work: This Section is intended for installation use only. Any language contained in this Section that attempts to modify the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.

Contact Information: David French 909-454-6516 [email protected] System Operation: This is a renewal and upgrade to the current surveillance system. City of Jurupa Valley to provide all wiring and any poles for mounting as well as AC power at POE switch locations. Tyco/JCI to provide all camera installation, testing and Manufactures training All New Cameras specified on City of Jurupa Provided Layout Programming Info: Please check frame rates to be set at 7to 10 FPS Site Conditions: Two story office building with yard.

Existing Equipment: Exacq Server with 12 cameras on the system. Exacq Server is in the \"Crows nest\" on second floor to be replaced by new cameras specified on City of Jurupa Valley.

Customer Expectations: 7:30 AM to 4:00 PM
Training Expectations: Please instruct David French on operation General Comments: N/A
Customer Responsibilities / Johnson Controls Exclusions: access throughout, all necessary wiring, provided poles for pole mounted cameras and AC power at POE switch locations Documentation Needs: Camera locations per City of Jurupa Valley Layout

Contract Notes -

Page 6 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
V.Customer and Johnson Controls agree as follows:

A. Services.

A.1.Central Station Signal Receiving and Notification (Alarm Monitoring) Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.2.Communication Facilities. Intentionally left blank – Alarm Monitoring Services have not been purchased.

A.3.1 Enhanced Maintenance Service Plan. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.3.2 Expert Maintenance Service Plan (“Expert Maintenance”). 1. If Expert Maintenance is purchased, Johnson Controls will provide and bear the expense of maintenance/repair of the covered Equipment for issues related to normal wear and tear. The following are not covered under Expert Maintenance and any requested service will be provided on a time and materials basis: (a) window foil, (b) security screens, (c) product installed contrary to OEM specifications, (d) exterior wiring, (e) programming changes, (f) software updates/upgrades, unless Software Support Services are purchased, (g) consumables such as batteries and printer supplies, and (h) “Conditions” not covered by Warranty shown below. Customer shall pay for any related labor and/or materials for such work at Johnson Controls' then applicable rates. Additional charges may apply for service requiring the use of a lift. Johnson Controls’ obligation to perform Expert Maintenance service relates solely to the covered Equipment. 2. If Expert Maintenance is not purchased prior to the expiration of the Equipment Warranty, Johnson Controls will provide such Expert Maintenance only after inspecting the Equipment to be covered and making any necessary repairs or replacements to bring the Equipment/System into compliance with Johnson Controls’ specifications and/or the standards set by applicable law. 3. Expert Maintenance will be furnished during Johnson Controls’ “Normal Working Hours” (between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday, except holidays). Expert Maintenance performed outside of these hours is subject to additional charges. Provision of Expert Maintenance is conditioned upon the continued availability of system components/parts from the original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”).

A.3.3 Optimum Maintenance Service Plan. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.3.4 Essential Maintenance Service Plan. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.4. Testing/Inspections Service (“T/I”). Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.5.Investigator Response Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6. Select View Managed Video Services/Interactive Video Monitoring Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.1.Video/Audio Alarm Verification Service/Video Verification. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.2.Video Guard Tour. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.3.Video Escort. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.4.Video Assist. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.5.Video Audit. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.6.Outdoor Interactive Video Monitoring Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.7. Managed Video Portal. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.8.Unattended Delivery – Alarm Based Video Monitoring. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.6.9.Unattended Delivery – Live Video Monitoring of Process - Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.7. Closed Circuit Television (“CCTV”)/Video Equipment. (a)System Requirements. Customer will provide: (i) adequate illumination under all operational conditions for the proper operation of any video camera(s); (ii) any required 110 AC power supply; and (iii) appropriate space for monitors. (b)Audio Monitoring/Recording. Customer’s decision to install video equipment with audio recording and/or monitoring capability (“Video with Audio”) is based solely on Customer’s own independent business judgment, without any involvement or approval of Johnson Controls. Certain laws may limit or preclude the use of Video with Audio. By installing Video with Audio in Customer’s premises, Customer accepts the responsibility of knowing and fully complying with all applicable laws, including but not limited to all requirements that clear and conspicuous notice be posted in Customer’s premises warning of Customer’s use of audio recording and/or monitoring equipment on its premises.

A.8. New York City Fire System. Intentionally left blank.– covered system is not installed in NYC A.9. Vision/Vision with Auditing. Intentionally left blank - Service is no longer offered.

A.10. Hosted Access. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.11. Data Hosting/Storage Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.12. Data Hosting/Storage Services Encrypted. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.13. Mobile Security Management (“MSM”) Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.13. Mobile Security Management (“MSM”) Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.14. Software Support Services. If Software Support Services (“SSS”) are purchased they will be provided on licensed software titles expressly identified in this agreement, (the “Covered Software”). Support Conditions. SSS for Covered Software are subject to the following conditions (“Support Conditions”): (a) Johnson Controls’ receipt of the Software Support Fee; (b) the Covered Software is not modified from its standard form originally licensed by the software owner/licensor (“Licensor”); (c) Customer’s use of Covered Software is in accordance with the end user license agreement (“EULA”) between Customer and Licensor; if applicable; (d) Customer provides Johnson Controls (and/or its authorized representatives) with and when necessary (1) any information and/or documentation required to recreate the problem, defect, or non-conformity (individually/collectively, a “Problem”), (2) log in privileges for remote trouble shooting, (3) TCP/IP Ethernet network addresses, and (4) access to Customer’s network, servers and/or hardware; and (e) the processor, operating system and associated system software, and other interdependent or reliant software are operating properly. Exclusions. Johnson Controls will not provide SSS when a Problem is caused by (a) relocation, movement, improper operation, neglect or misuse of the Covered Software or associated Equipment/System; (b) Customer’s failure to maintain proper site or environmental conditions; (c) any attempts at configuration, repairs, support, or modifications to the Covered Software not performed by a Johnson Controls authorized representative; (d) discontinued systems or software; (e) casualty, act of God, the unauthorized acts of third parties; (f) failure or interruption of electrical power, telephone or communication line or like cause, or (g) any other cause external to the Covered Software. Problem Resolution. Johnson Controls will provide Customer with email and telephone support on the Covered Software. Johnson Controls then will use reasonable commercial efforts to resolve and correct the Problem within forty-eight (48) hours. Problem resolution and correction may be provided at Johnson Controls’ discretion as a software fix or workaround. Johnson Controls will periodically advise Customer on Johnson Controls progress in diagnosing and/or correcting the reported Problem. Customer acknowledges that Johnson Controls may be unable to resolve Problem due to (a) Johnson Controls inability to recreate, locate or identify the Problem; (b) issues related to Customer’s system hardware, network or Internet connectivity issues; or (3) issues for which the Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) and/or Licensor (collectively, also referred to as an “Johnson Controls Supplier”) has not provided a resolution or workaround. If Johnson Controls is unable to resolve or correct a Problem, Johnson Controls will notify Customer and provide underlying information as available.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Johnson Controls makes no warranties that its efforts will be successful in diagnosing, resolving, or correcting any Problem. Software Updates. Customer understands that the SSS provides access to updates and upgrades but do not include the provision of software update or upgrade services unless purchased. If software upgrades are required to correct a Problem, such software upgrades will be provided, at Customer’s request, on a time and materials basis at Johnson Controls’ then-current hourly rates as such upgrades become available from the Johnson Controls Supplier. On Site Engineer Support Services. If Johnson Controls determines that on-site engineer support

Page 7 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

services (“ESS”) are necessary to correct a Problem, Johnson Controls will provide ESS on a time and materials basis at Johnson Controls’ then current ESS rates plus any related travel or other expenses. Such ESS may include on-site software installation assistance, training, or Problem diagnosis, resolution, and/or correction. Return of Defective Media. Customer may return any defective media directly to Johnson Controls using a Johnson Controls furnished return authorization number. Fee for Reinstatement. Customer may incur reinstatement charges (“Reinstatement Fee”) at Johnson Controls then current rates, if it allows SSS to lapse and later requests reinstatement within one year from the time the SSS lapses. Limitation of Liability.

Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, Customer acknowledges and agrees that neither Johnson Controls nor its Supplier will be responsible for Problems caused by changes in the operating characteristics of the Equipment/System upon which the Covered Software is operating, or for problems in the interaction of the Covered Software with Customer’s Network or existing software/firmware/hardware. In no event will Johnson Controls and/or Johnson Controls Supplier be liable for any (a) third party claims; (b) loss or damage to any systems, records or data, or liabilities related to a violation of an individual's privacy rights; or (c) indirect, incidental, special, consequential, punitive, reliance, or cover damages (including lost profits and lost savings). Customer further agrees that, in no event will Johnson Controls’ and/or Johnson Controls Supplier’s aggregate liability regardless of cause (including, but not limited to, liability for negligence, strict liability, breach of contract, misrepresentation and other contract or tort claims) arising from the provision of or failure to provide SSS and/or Customer’s use of or inability to use any Covered Software or related System, exceed the lesser of USD$1,000 or the total SSS Fees paid by Customer.

A.15. Lynx Network Duress and Emergency Notification System (“Lynx System”). Intentionally left blank – Lynx System/Services have not been purchased.

A.16. RFID Tracking System (“System”). Intentionally left blank – RFID Systems have not been purchased.

A.17. HID SEOS Mobile Credential Service (“Service”). Intentionally left blank – Service has not been purchased.

A.18. Customer For Life Program (“Service”). Intentionally left blank – Service has not been purchased.

A.19. Outdoor Radar Perimeter Protection. Intentionally left blank – System has not been purchased.

A.20. Self-Printing Service. Intentionally left blank – Service has not been purchased.

A.21. Audio Enabled Devices. Customer acknowledges and agrees that Customer’s decision to install and/or activate security equipment with audio recording and/or monitoring capability (“Audio Enabled Devices”) is based solely on Customer’s own independent business judgment or knowledge of applicable law. Tyco does not recommend, endorse, or render an opinion, legal or otherwise regarding such decision. Certain laws may limit or preclude the use of Audio Enabled Devices in Customer’s premises. It is the responsibility of the Customer to know and fully comply with all applicable laws, including but not limited to any or all requirements that clear and conspicuous notice be provided concerning of the use of Audio Enabled Devices in Customer’s premises. In providing, installing and/or activating such Audio Enabled Devices, Tyco is relying on Customer's representations and agreements set forth herein and that the warranty, limitation of liability, limitation of action, release, third party indemnity, and other terms, limitations, restrictions, and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall fully apply.

A.22. Proactive Health Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.23. Automated Notification. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.24. Remote Technical Services. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased A.25. Anyvision Devices. Intentionally left blank – Equipment has not been purchased.

A.26. WhosOnLocation Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.27. Vape Detection System. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.28. Alcatraz Cloud Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.29. CloudVue Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.30. Visual Alarm Verification Service. Intentionally left blank - Services have not been purchased.

A.31. Halo Smart Sensor System. Intentionally left blank - System have not been purchased.

A.32. Embedded Resource Services. Intentionally left blank - Service have not been purchased.

A.33. Open Path System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.34 Open Eye Cloud Video Platform ("Open Eye Services"). Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.35 Sabre Systems Services. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.36 Cantronics Telethermographic Device. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.37. Digital Barriers Telethermographic System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.38. Installation and Lease Subscription Services for Evolv Express. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.39. Installation and Purchase Subscription Services for Evolv Express. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.40. Illustra Telethermographic System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.41. Wello Body Temperature Detection System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.42. ZKTECO Temperature System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.43. Milestone Video Surveillance Equipment. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.44. SES Mobile-Based Keyless Access Control System. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.45. Solink Cloud Video Services. Intentionally left blank - System or Service have not been purchased.

A.46. Qolsys Panel. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.47. GuardRFID. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.48. Purchase and Subscription Services for Motorola Concealed Weapons Detection System. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.49. Installation and Subscription Services for Motorola Concealed Weapons Detection System. Intentionally left blank - Panel have not been purchased.

A.50. Additional Services. If any other services, including but not limited to the following, are being furnished under this Agreement, Customer and Johnson Controls will enter into a separate Rider that will be attached to and incorporated as part of this Agreement: (a) Select Link - Immediate Response Information System (IRIS) (b) Managed Access Control (c) Electronic Article Surveillance (“EAS”) (d) Guard Response Service (e) Radio Frequency Identification (“RFID”) (f) Training Services (g) Watchman’s Reporting Service.

B. Warranty (90-Day). 1. Any part of the System (as distinguished from the Firmware/Software) installed under this Agreement, including the wiring, which proves to be defective in material or workmanship within ninety (90) days of the date of completion of the installation ("Warranty Period"), will be repaired or replaced, at in Johnson Controls' option with a new or functionally operative part. Materials required to repair or replace such defective components will be furnished at no charge during the Warranty Period. Warranty Services will be furnished during Johnson Control's "Normal Working Hours" (between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday, except holidays). Warranty Service performed outside of these hours is subject to additional charges.

Page 8 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

3. The following “Conditions” are not covered by Warranty: (a) damage or extra service time needed resulting from accidents, acts of God, lightning, strikes, riots, floods, terrorism, acts of War, alteration, misuse, tampering or abuse, adjustments, repairs or maintenance not performed by Johnson Controls, or from parts, equipment, accessories, attachments or other devices not furnished by Johnson Controls; (b) Customer’s failure to properly follow operating instructions provided by Johnson Controls or OEM; (c) adjustments necessitated by misalignment of video cameras, improper adjustment of monitor brightness and contrast tuning dials or insufficient light on the area viewed by the camera(s); (d) trouble due to interruption of Internet, telecommunications, and/or electrical service; (e) battery failure; (f) devices designed to fail in protecting the equipment/system, such as, but not limited to, fuses and circuit breakers; and (g) System modifications/customization requested by Customer. If Customer calls Johnson Controls for Warranty Service and Johnson Controls’ representative finds that one of the “Conditions” has led to the inoperability or apparent inoperability of the Equipment/System or any component, Johnson Controls may bill Customer for the service call whether or not Johnson Controls actually works on the Equipment/System. If repairs are required due to one of the above "Conditions”, Johnson Controls will charge Customer for such work on a time and materials basis at Johnson Controls' then applicable rates for labor and materials.

4. THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE CUSTOMER’S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WITH RESPECT TO ANY AND ALL LOSSES OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING JOHNSON CONTROLS' NEGLIGENCE, IS REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT AS SPECIFIED ABOVE. JOHNSON

CONTROLS WILL IN NO EVENT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR

PERSONAL INJURY OR DAMAGES TO PROPERTY, HOWEVER OCCASIONED, WHETHER ALLEGED AS RESULTING FROM BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT BY JOHNSON CONTROLS OR NEGLIGENCE OF JOHNSON CONTROLS OR OTHERWISE. Johnson Controls makes no and specifically disclaims all representations or warranties that the services, products, software or third party product or software will be secure from cyber threats, hacking or other similar malicious activity, or will detect the presence of, or eliminate, treat, or mitigate the spread transmission, or outbreak of any pathogen, disease, virus or other contagion, including but not limited to COVID 19.

5. Unless agreed to in writing by the parties, any technical support, assistance, or advice (“Technical Support”) provided by JOHNSON CONTROLS, such as suggestions as to design use and suitability of the Equipment and products for the Customer’s application, is provided in good faith, but Customer acknowledges and agrees that JOHNSON CONTROLS is not the designer, engineer, or installer of record. Any Technical Support is provided for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as a representation or warranty, express or implied, concerning the proper selection, use, and/or application of the Equipment and products. Customer assumes exclusive responsibility for determining if the equipment and products supplied by JOHNSON CONTROLS are suitable for its intended application and all risk and liability, whether based in contract, tort or otherwise, in connection with its application and use of the equipment and products.

C. System Requirements, Miscellaneous. 1. Vaults. Customer must ensure that any Customer vault protected by sound or vibration detector systems has the minimum construction characteristics prescribed by the Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc. 2. System Testing. Customer must test all detection devices or other electronic equipment according to procedures prescribed by Johnson Controls prior to setting the alarm system for closed periods and must notify Johnson Controls promptly if such equipment fails to respond to any such test. 3.

Familiarization Period. UNLESS CUSTOMER HAS REJECTED THE FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD (EXCEPT WHERE A FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD IS REQUIRED BY LAW), CUSTOMER AGREES THAT: (a) DURING A FIVE (5) DAY FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD, OR SUCH PERIOD AS IS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND (b) FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE

INSTALLATION AND THE COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTION TO JOHNSON CONTROLS' CMC (AND DURING ANY APPLICABLE EXTENSIONS), JOHNSON CONTROLS HAS NO OBLIGATION TO, AND WILL NOT, RESPOND TO ANY ALARM SIGNAL RECEIVED AT THE JOHNSON CONTROLS' CMC FROM CUSTOMER’S PREMISES DURING SUCH FAMILIARIZATION PERIOD. CUSTOMER ALSO AGREES THAT DURING SUCH PERIOD JOHNSON CONTROLS HAS NO OBLIGATION TO, AND WILL NOT, NOTIFY ANY AUTHORITIES, CUSTOMER, OR A PERSON ON CUSTOMER’S EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST, OR TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION WITH REGARD TO ANY ALARM SIGNAL JOHNSON CONTROLS RECEIVES, EVEN IF DUE TO AN ACTUAL EMERGENCY EVENT. 4. Special Equipment Requirements. If Customer requires installation or service of equipment in areas inaccessible without the use of lifts or cranes, or if non-standard conditions at the Customer site require special equipment for installation or service, Customer will provide such equipment, or will reimburse Johnson Controls for any applicable charges or fees. 5. Training Services. Johnson Controls provides initial training to Customer on use of the equipment installed at the time of installation. Thereafter, Customer may purchase additional training in one-hour increments at Johnson Controls’ then current rate. 6. Site Preparation, Intrusion and Restoration.

Unless otherwise noted herein, Customer is responsible for providing: (a) any necessary electric current, (b) an outlet within 10 feet of an alarm control panel, (c) telephone connections, (d) network drops, and (e) any required conduit, wiremold, or other raceway, (f) any required IP address assignments, and (g) additional network software licensing. The installation of the equipment/system may necessarily require cutting, bolting or fastening into Customer's floors, walls and/or ceilings. Johnson Controls shall not be responsible for any expenses related to intrusion, mold, fungi, bacteria, wet/dry rot, patching, floor or wall finishing, or paint, tile, carpet or wallpaper matching, restoration or replacement resulting from installation or service of the equipment/system. 7. Battery Powered Devices. Customer understands that any battery-powered motion detectors, smoke detectors, door and window contact transmitters and other detection sensors installed/serviced under this Agreement require batteries to operate. THESE BATTERY-POWERED DETECTION SENSORS WILL NOT OPERATE, AND THE ALARM WILL NOT SOUND, IF THE BATTERY ENERGY LEVEL OR CHARGE IS LOW, OR DEPLETED. It is Customer’s sole responsibility to maintain and replace any batteries. Customer shall carefully read and follow the owner’s manual, instructions and warnings for all such equipment and regularly inspect the sensors for dirt and dust buildup and test the sensors weekly to help maintain continued operation. 8. Customer is solely responsible for the establishment, operation, maintenance, access, security and other aspects of its computer network (“Network”) and shall supply Johnson Controls secure Network access for providing its services. Products networked, connected to the internet, or otherwise connected to computers or other devices must be appropriately protected by Customer and/or end user against unauthorized access. Customer is responsible to take appropriate measures, including performing back-ups, to protect information, including without limit data, software, or files (collectively “Data”) prior to receiving the service or products.

D. Electronic Media; Personal Information; Consent to Call, Text or Email. 1.Electronic Media. Either party may scan, fax, email, image, or otherwise convert this Agreement into an electronic format of any type or form, now known or developed in the future. Any unaltered or unadulterated copy of this Agreement produced from such an electronic format will be legally binding upon the parties and equivalent to the original for all purposes, including litigation. Johnson Controls may rely upon Customer’s assent to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, if Customer has signed this Agreement or has demonstrated its intent to be bound whether by electronic signature or otherwise. 2. Personal Information. Customer represents and warrants that Customer has obtained all consents and has the right to (a) disclose to Johnson Controls all personal information disclosed hereunder concerning individuals/employees/or other third parties including all information contained in Customer’s Emergency Call List (“ECL”); (b) permit Johnson Controls to collect (including consent to record telephone conversations with Johnson Controls), use, disclose and transfer such personal information; and (c) expressly authorizes Johnson Controls to use such personal information to administer the relationship and the agreement between Customer and Johnson Controls, including, but not limited to, contacting Customer personnel at the telephone numbers and/or email addresses provided: (i) using SMS, text, prerecorded messages, or automated calling devices to deliver messages to set/confirm a service/installation appointment; and/or (ii) to provide information or offers about products and services of interest to Customer. Customer acknowledges and agrees that Johnson Controls may share all such information with its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and its/their successor corporations or any subcontractor or assignee, within and outside the country in which the Customer is located and thereby subject such information to the laws of such countries.

E. Limitation of Liability, Indemnification (Sale of Access/Video Equipment and Installation Only). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement or any purchasing document presented by Customer, only Video and/or Access Equipment and Services shall be provided by Johnson Controls under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Equipment and Services provided by Johnson Controls under this Agreement will not include: (a) burglar and/or fire detection or alarm equipment or monitoring, maintenance, inspection or other services; (b) security guard services; or (c) architectural, engineering, or design professional services. If any other equipment or services are requested by or provided to Customer, then such equipment and/or services shall be provided under a separate written agreement executed by Customer and Johnson Controls which shall contain the alarm industry specific terms and conditions.

1.Indemnity. (a) Johnson Controls shall defend, indemnify and hold Customer, its corporate affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, agents and employees harmless from damage, liability and expense resulting from the negligent acts or willful misconduct of Johnson Controls' agents and employees committed while performing Services on Customer’s premises, to the extent that they are the direct cause of the loss, damage or injury to third parties or Customer’s property (e.g., equipment dislodging and striking a third party due to improper installation), as opposed to being caused by an occurrence or the consequences therefrom that the Equipment or Services were intended to deter, detect or avert. (b) Customer shall defend, indemnify and hold Johnson Controls, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, agents, suppliers and employees, harmless from damage, liability and expense to the extent that any such loss is not directly caused by the negligent acts or willful misconduct of Johnson Controls’ agents, suppliers and/or employees, or arises out of any claim related to invasion of privacy, infliction of emotional distress, harassment, violation of eavesdropping/wiretapping laws or similar claims arising out of Customer’s use of the Equipment and/or Services.

2. Limitations on Liability. If Customer uses the Equipment and/or Services to aid in monitoring or controlling the location or activities of persons on or about its property and premises, Customer acknowledges that the Equipment and/or Services are not intended to be the sole means for doing so. Johnson Controls’ Equipment and Services do not cause and cannot eliminate occurrences of the events they are intended to deter, detect, avert or record. Johnson Controls is not an insurer of the safety or security of any person, entity or property, or against the risks attendant to a person’s presence in, or ingress to or egress from any building, property or area that may be monitored by the Equipment and/or Services. The amounts Johnson Controls charges Customer are not insurance premiums. Such charges are based upon the value of the Equipment and Services provided and are unrelated to any such risk of loss. Johnson Controls and its suppliers do not undertake and assume no liability for such risk by providing the Equipment and/or Services. If Johnson Controls and/or one (or more) of its suppliers is nevertheless found liable under any legal theory for loss, damage or injury caused directly or indirectly by occurrences or the consequences therefrom which the Equipment

Page 9 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

and/or Services are intended to deter, detect, avert or record, Johnson Controls’ liability and the liability of its suppliers shall be limited to the sums paid by Customer for the Equipment or Services at issue as Customer’s sole remedy. Johnson Controls and its suppliers are not responsible for the preservation of any computer programs or data and Customer is responsible for maintaining adequate back-ups.

F. Other Charges; Remedies; Termination. 1. There may be a service charge to Customer for cancelled installation/service appointments if Customer cancels less than 24-hours prior to dispatch, or if Johnson Controls’ representative is sent to the Customer’s premises in response to a service call for false alarm or System malfunction caused by Customer’s operation contrary to instructions, failure to close or properly secure a window, door or other protected point, or improper adjustment of monitors or accessory components. 2. Customer acknowledges and agrees that timely payments of the full amounts listed on invoices is an essential term of this Agreement and that Customer’s failure to make payment in full when due is a material breach of this Agreement. Customer further acknowledges that if there is any amount outstanding on an invoice, it is material to Johnson Controls and shall give Johnson Controls, in addition to any other available remedies, the right to, without notice, (a) suspend, discontinue or terminate performing any Services and/or withhold further deliveries of equipment and other materials, terminate or suspend any unpaid software licenses, and/or suspend Johnson Controls’ obligations under or terminate this Agreement and (b) to charge interest on the amounts that remain unpaid more than thirty (30) days past the due date specified in the invoice(s) at a rate equal to the lesser of 1.5% per month or the maximum rate permitted under applicable law, until payment is made in full. Customer agrees to pay all costs, expenses and fees of Johnson Controls’ enforcement of this Agreement, including collection expenses, court costs, and attorneys’ fees. Johnson Controls’ election to continue providing future Services does not, in any way, diminish Johnson Controls’ right to terminate or suspend Services or exercise any or all rights or remedies under this Agreement. Johnson Controls shall not be liable for any damages, claims, expenses or liabilities arising from or relating to suspension of services for non-payment. In the event that there are exigent circumstances requiring Services or Johnson Controls otherwise performs Services at the premises following suspension, those Services shall be governed by the terms of this Agreement unless a separate contract is executed. If Customer disputes any late payment notice or Johnson Controls’ efforts to collect payment, Customer shall immediately notify Johnson Controls in writing and explain the basis of the dispute. In the event of Customer’s default, the balance of any outstanding amounts will be immediately due and payable. Installation Charge(s) are based on Johnson Controls performing the installation with its own personnel. If for any reason installation must be performed by outside contractors, Installation Charge(s) may be subject to revision. 3.In addition to any other remedies available to Johnson Controls, Johnson Controls may terminate this Agreement and discontinue any Service(s) if (a) Johnson Controls' CMC is substantially damaged by fire or catastrophe or if Johnson Controls is unable to obtain any connections or privileges required to transmit signals between the Customer's premises, Johnson Controls' CMC or the Municipal Fire or Police Department or other first responder; (b) Customer fails to follow Johnson Controls’ recommendations for the repair or replacement of defective parts of the System not covered under the Warranty or QSP Service; (c) Customer's failure to follow the operating instructions provided by Johnson Controls results in an undue number of false alarms or System malfunction; (d) in Johnson Controls’ sole opinion, the premises in which the System is installed are unsafe, unsuitable, or so modified or altered after installation as to render continuation of Service(s) impractical or impossible; (e) If Johnson Controls’ performance of its obligations becomes impracticable due to obsolescence or unavailability of systems, Equipment, or products (including component parts and/or materials) or because Johnson Controls or its supplier(s) has discontinued the manufacture or the sale of the Equipment and/or products or is no longer in the business of providing the Services; (f) Johnson Controls is unable to obtain or continue to support technologies, TeleCom Services, or Communication Facilities; (g) changes in applicable law; or (h) Customer fails to make payments when due or otherwise breaches this Agreement. Johnson Controls will not be liable for any damages or subject to any penalty as a result of any such termination. Johnson Controls may terminate this Agreement, or the affected portions, at its sole discretion upon notice to the Customer if Johnson Controls’ performance of its obligations are prohibited because of changes in applicable laws, regulations or codes.

G. Hazardous Materials. For all projects except those involving new construction, Customer represents and warrants that to the best of Customer’s knowledge the work site is free of any hazardous materials. The term “hazardous materials” includes but is not be limited to asbestos, asbestos-containing material, polychlorinated biphenyl (“PCB”), formaldehyde or other potentially toxic or otherwise hazardous material. If any such substance is discovered on the work site, Johnson Controls will not be required to install or service the Equipment at such site unless and until Customer certifies the removal or safe containment of such hazardous materials. Customer shall indemnify, defend, and hold Johnson Controls, its officers, directors, agents, and vendors harmless from any damages, claims, injuries, liabilities resulting from the exposure of Johnson Controls’ employees, contractors, or subcontractors to hazardous materials at the work site; provided, however, that the foregoing provision will not apply when it has been determined that such hazardous materials were brought to the work site by Johnson Controls.

H. Waivers. 1.Waiver of Jury Trial. CUSTOMER AND JOHNSON CONTROLS BOTH AGREE TO WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY MANNER CONNECTED WITH OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT. 2.Mutual SAFETY Act Waiver. Certain of Johnson Controls’ systems and services have received Certification and/or Designation as Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technologies (“QATT”) under the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002, 6 U.S.C. §§ 441-444 (the “SAFETY Act”). As required under 6 C.F.R. 25.5 (e), to the maximum extent permitted by law, Johnson Controls and Customer hereby agree to waive their right to make any claims against the other for any losses, including business interruption losses, sustained by either party or their respective employees, resulting from an activity resulting from an “Act of Terrorism” as defined in 6 C.F.R. 25.2, when QATT have been deployed in defense against, response to, or recovery from such Act of Terrorism.

I. Miscellaneous. 1. Enforceability. If any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

2. Paragraph and Section Headings; Captions; Counterparts. The headings and captions contained in this Agreement are inserted for convenience or reference only, and are not to be deemed part of or to be used in construing this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such separate counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same agreement. 3. FARs. Johnson Controls supplies “commercial items” within the meaning of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), 48 CFR Parts 1-53. As to any customer order for a U.S. Government contract, Johnson Controls will comply only with those mandatory flow-downs for commercial item and commercial services subcontracts listed either at FAR 52.244-6, or 52.212-5(e)(1), as applicable. 4. Export Control. Customer shall not export or re-export, directly or indirectly, any: (i) product or service provided under this Agreement; (ii) technical data; (iii) software; (iv) information; or (v) items acquired under this Agreement to any country for which the United States Government (or any agency thereof) requires an export license or other approval without first obtaining any licenses, consents or permits that may be required under the applicable laws of the U.S. or other foreign jurisdictions, including the Export Administration Act and Regulations and shall incorporate in all export shipping documents the applicable destination control statements. Customer shall, at its own expense, defend, indemnify and save Johnson Controls harmless from and against all third-party claims, liability, loss or damage (including attorneys' fees and other defense costs), assessed against or suffered by Johnson Controls as a result of an allegation or claim of noncompliance by Customer with this Section. The obligations contained in this Section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5. Insurance. Johnson Controls maintains comprehensive General Liability and Automobile Liability Insurance in amounts that meet or exceed: $1,000,000 per incident - $2,000,000 in the aggregate and Worker’s Compensation coverage as required by law. Johnson Controls will not be required to provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of any party, nor will Johnson Controls be required to designate any party as a statutory employer for any purposes.

6. Johnson Controls Brand. Without exception, Johnson Controls-branded Signage, including yard signs, window stickers and warning signs will remain the property of Johnson Controls and may be removed by Johnson Controls at any time. Customer’s right to display Johnson Controls-branded Signage is not transferable and ceases upon termination or expiration of this Agreement. 7. Resale. If Johnson Controls is connecting to a previously installed existing system, to the extent the previously installed existing system is Customer’s properly, it shall remain Customer’s property.

J. System Software; Network Connections. 1. Any software provided with the System or in connection with the Services is proprietary to Johnson Controls and/or Johnson Controls’ supplier(s) and is licensed or sublicensed to Customer on a non-exclusive basis. Customer may not (a) disclose the Software or source code to any third parties, (b) duplicate, reproduce, or copy all or any part of the Software, or (c) use the Software on equipment other than with the designated System with which it was furnished. A separate Software License Agreement or End User License Agreement between Johnson Controls and Customer and/or the software publisher may be required to use the software and/or obtain updates/upgrades. If the installed Equipment is to be connected to Customer’s computer network (“Network”), Johnson Controls will furnish and install the software needed to run the Equipment and will connect the Equipment to the Network according to the Network settings supplied by Customer. Installation shall not include modifications to the Network, security, or firewall settings. Customer will supply a TCP/IP Ethernet network address and central processing unit per Johnson Controls specifications for access control system operation. Johnson Controls shall not be responsible for the setup, operation, or maintenance of the Network or Network performance or compatibility issues. Johnson Controls may assess additional charges, if Johnson Controls is unable to connect to the Network or if any additional Equipment is required to facilitate connectivity between the Network and the Equipment. 2. Open Source Software. Johnson Controls represents and warrants to the end user of the System that, to the extent the System includes any Open Source Software, the internal use and operation of the System by the end user will not create any obligation on the part of the end user under the terms of any Open Source License (i) to make any source code or object code available to third parties, or (ii) to license, disclose or otherwise make available to third parties any proprietary software, data or other information, or any associated intellectual property. As used herein, the term “Open Source Software” means any software, program, module, code, library, database, driver or similar component (or portion thereof) that is royalty free, proprietary software, the use of which requires any contractual obligations by the user such as, without limitation, that software that is subject to, distributed, transmitted, licensed or otherwise made available under any of the following licenses: GNU General Public License, GNU Library or “Lesser” Public License, Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) license (including Free BSD and BSD-style licenses), MIT license, Mozilla Public License, IBM Public License, Apache Software License, Artistic license (e.g., PERL), Sun Industry Standards Source License, Sun Community Source License (SCSL), Intel Open Source License, Apple Public Source License, or any substantially similar license, or any license that has been approved by the Open Source Initiative, Free Software Foundation or similar group (collectively, “Open Source Licenses”).

K. Force Majeure. Johnson Controls assumes no liability for delays in installation of the Equipment or for the consequences therefrom, however caused. Johnson Controls shall not be liable, nor in breach or default of its obligations under this Agreement, for delays, interruption, failure to render services, or any other failure by Johnson Controls to perform an obligation

Page 10 of 20 ends

© 2022 Johnson Controls. All Rights Reserved
e-Form 8880UE01 (07/2022)

under this Agreement, where such delay, interruption or failure is caused, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, by a Force Majeure Event. A “Force Majeure Event” is a condition or event that is beyond the reasonable control of Johnson Controls, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable, including, without limitation, acts of God, severe weather (including but not limited to hurricanes, tornados, severe snowstorms or severe rainstorms), wildfires, floods, earthquakes, seismic disturbances, or other natural disasters, acts or omissions of any governmental authority (including change of any applicable law or regulation), epidemics, pandemics, disease, viruses, quarantines, or other public health risks and/or responses thereto, condemnation, strikes, lock-outs, labor disputes, an increase of 5% or more in tariffs or other excise taxes for materials to be used on the project, fires, explosions or other casualties, thefts, vandalism, civil disturbances, insurrection, mob violence, riots, war or other armed conflict (or the serious threat of same), acts of terrorism, electrical power outages, interruptions or degradations in telecommunications, computer, network, or electronic communications systems, data breach, cyber-attacks, ransomware, unavailability or shortage of parts, materials, supplies, or transportation, or any other cause or casualty beyond the reasonable control of Johnson Controls. If Johnson Controls’ performance of the work is delayed, impacted, or prevented by a Force Majeure Event or its continued effects, Johnson Controls shall be excused from performance under the Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if Johnson Controls is delayed in achieving one or more of the scheduled milestones set forth in the Agreement due to a Force Majeure Event, Johnson Controls will be entitled to extend the relevant completion date by the amount of time that Johnson Controls was delayed as a result of the Force Majeure Event, plus such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of the delay. To the extent that the Force Majeure Event directly or indirectly increases Johnson Controls’ cost to perform the services, Customer is obligated to reimburse Johnson Controls for such increased costs, including, without limitation, costs incurred by Johnson Controls for additional labor, inventory storage, expedited shipping fees, trailer and equipment rental fees, subcontractor fees, compliance with vaccination requirements or other costs and expenses incurred by Johnson Controls in connection with the Force Majeure.

L. Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable by the Customer except upon written consent of Johnson Controls first being obtained. Johnson Controls shall have the right to assign this Agreement or to subcontract any of its obligations under this Agreement without notice to Customer.

M. Digital Enabled Services, Software and Hosted Software Services. If Johnson Controls provides Digital Enabled Services under this Agreement, these Digital Enabled Services require the collection, transfer and ingestion of building, equipment, system time series, and other data to Johnson Controls’ cloud-hosted software applications. Customer consents to and grants Johnson Controls right to collect, ingest and use such data to enable Johnson Controls and its affiliates and agents to provide, maintain, protect, develop and improve the Digital Enabled Services and Johnson Controls products and services. Customer acknowledges that, while Digital Enabled Services generally improve equipment performance and services, Digital Enabled Services do not prevent all potential malfunction, insure against all loss, or guarantee a certain level of performance. Customer shall be solely responsible for the establishment, operation, maintenance, access, security and other aspects of its computer network (“Network”), shall appropriately protect hardware and products connected to the Network and will supply Johnson Controls secure Network access for providing its Digital Enabled Services. As used herein, "Digital Enabled Services" mean services provided hereunder that employ Johnson Controls software and related equipment installed at Customer facilities and Johnson Controls cloud-hosted software offerings and tools to improve, develop, and enable such services.

Digital Enabled Service may include, but are not limited to, (a) remote servicing and inspection, (b) advanced equipment fault detection and diagnostics, and (c) data dashboarding and health reporting. If Customer accesses and uses Software that is used to provide the Digital Enabled Services, the Software Terms (defined below) will govern such access and use.

Johnson Controls Digital Solutions. Use, implementation, and deployment of the software and hosted software products (“Software”) offered under these terms shall be subject to, and governed Johnson Controls’ standard terms for such Software and Software related professional services in effect from time to time at www.johnsoncontrols.com/techterms (collectively, the “Software Terms”). Specifically, the Johnson Controls General EULA set forth at www.johnsoncontrols.com/buildings/legal/digital/generaleula governs access to and use of software installed on Customer’s premises or systems and the Johnson Controls Terms of Service set forth at www.johnsoncontrols.com/buildings/legal/digital/generaltos govern access to and use of hosted software products. The applicable Software Terms are incorporated herein by this reference. Other than the right to use the Software as set forth in the Software Terms, Johnson Controls and its licensors reserve all right, title, and interest (including all intellectual property rights) in and to the Software and improvements to the Software. The Software that is licensed hereunder is licensed subject to the Software Terms and not sold. If there is a conflict between the other terms herein and the Software Terms, the Software Terms shall take precedence and govern with respect to rights and responsibilities relating to the Software, its implementation and deployment and any improvements thereto.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, unless otherwise agreed, the following terms apply to Software that is provided to Customer on a subscription basis (i.e., a time limited license or use right), (each a “Software Subscription”): Each Software Subscription provided hereunder will commence on the date the initial credentials for the Software are made available (the “Subscription Start Date”) and will continue in effect until the expiration of the subscription term noted in the applicable statement of work, order or other applicable ordering document . At the expiration of the Software Subscription, such Software Subscription will automatically renew for consecutive one (1) year terms (each a “Renewal Subscription Term”), unless either party provides the other party with a notice of non-renewal at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Software Subscriptions purchases are non-cancelable, and the sums paid nonrefundable. Fees for Software Subscriptions shall be paid annually in advance, invoiced on the Subscription Start Date and each subsequent anniversary thereof. Customer shall pay all invoiced amounts within thirty calendar days after the date of invoice. Payments not made within such time period shall be subject to late charges as set forth in the Software Terms. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, the subscription fee for each Renewal Subscription Term will be priced at Johnson Controls' then-applicable list price for that Software offering. Any use of Software that exceeds the scope, metrics or volume set forth in this Agreement and applicable SOW will be subject to additional fees based on the date such excess use began.

N. Privacy. 1. Johnson Controls as Processor: Where Johnson Controls factually acts as Processor of Personal Data (as defined therein) on behalf of Customer, the terms at www.johnsoncontrols.com/dpa shall apply. 2. Johnson Controls as Controller: Johnson Controls will collect, process and transfer certain personal data of Customer and its personnel related to the business relationship between it and Customer (for example names, email addresses, telephone numbers) as controller and in accordance with Johnson Controls’ Privacy Notice at https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/privacy. Customer acknowledges Johnson Controls’ Privacy Notice and strictly to the extent consent is mandatorily required under applicable law, Customer consents to such collection, processing and transfer. To the extent consent to such collection, processing and transfer by Johnson Control is mandatorily required from Customer’s personnel under applicable law, Customer warrants and represents that it has obtained such consent.

O. Dispute Resolution: Johnson Controls shall have the sole and exclusive right to determine whether any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to the Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be submitted to a court of law or arbitrated. The laws of Delaware shall govern the validity, enforceability, and interpretation of this Agreement, without regard to conflicts of law principles thereof, and the exclusive venue for any such litigation or arbitration shall be in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The parties waive any objection to the exclusive jurisdiction of the specified forums, including any objection based on forum non conveniens. In the event the matter is submitted to a court, Johnson Controls and Customer hereby agree to waive their right to trial by jury. In the event the matter is submitted to arbitration by Johnson Controls, the costs of arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties, and the arbitrator’s award may be confirmed and reduced to judgment in any court of competent jurisdiction. Except as provided below, no claim or cause of action, whether known or unknown, shall be brought by either party against the other more than one year after the claim first arose. Claims not subject to the one-year limitation include claims for unpaid: (1) contract amounts, (2) change order amounts (approved or requested) and (3) delays and/or work inefficiencies. Customer will pay all of Johnson Controls' reasonable collection costs (including legal fees and expenses).

P. Johnson Controls License Information: AL 1498, 1499, 1500, 1501, 1502, A-0244, The Security Industry is governed by the rules and regulations of the Alabama Electronic Security Board of Licensure. If you would like information on these rules and regulations or would like to register a complaint you can contact the Board at: AESBL 7956 Vaughn Rd., Montgomery 36116, (334) 264-9388 Fax: 334-264-9332 AK 125516; 1058473, 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 7 Anchorage, AK 99507 AR 0000199, 0030740118 Regulated by Arkansas Bd. of Private Investigators & Private Security Agencies, #1 State Police Plaza Dr., Little Rock 72209, (501) 618-8600 AZ ROC281489, 18267-0 CA 977249; alarm company operators are licensed and regulated by the Bureau of Security & Investigative Services, Dept. of Consumer Affairs, Sacramento, CA 95814 CT 0106099-L5 DC ECS1327 FL EF20000890, EF20000341,EF0000478 GA LVA002833, LVA205386, LVU004635 HI CT-32427 ID PWC-C-12256-A-4, RCE-33602, EC012834 IL 127001526, 128000247, 128000246, 128000243 LA 24889, F523, F489 MA 401- C, MI 3601206912, A-0352, A-0170, 3602206914, A-0638, 3602206913, A-1058, A-1199 Whitcomb Avenue Madison Heights, MI 48071; MN TS651063 MS 15024088, 19530-SC NC 846- CSA, 28510-SP-FA/LV, 19385-SP-FA/LV, 27353-SP-FA/LV, 19718-SP-FA/LV, 24191-SP-FA/LV, 22850-SP-FA/LV 101 Industrial Drive, Ste 104 Raleigh, NC 27069, (919) 788-5320 NJ 34BF00050200, P00451, 607013 NM 375283 NV 0077542, F470, F469, NY 12000327404, Licensed by NYS Dept. of State OH E16782, 50 -18-1052, 50-25-1050, 50-48-1032, 50-57- 1119, 53-31-1582 OK AC-67 OR CLE-322, 197010, AC-67 PA Pennsylvania Home Improvement Contractor Registration Number; PA010083 RI 18004, AF-09170 TN ACC1704, ACC1705, ACC1707, ACC1708, ACC1709, ACC710, ACC1711 TX B00536, 4200 Buckingham Road Ste 150, Ft. Worth, TX 76115 – Dept of Public Safety, Private Security 5805 N. Lamar Blvd, Austin 78752, ACR-1460 UT 8390557-6501 VA 11-7587, 11-7575, 11-7591, 11-7573, 11-7589, 11-7578, 2705147765 WA JOHNSCS837N4, 19625 62nd Ave South, Ste C112 Kent, WA 98032 WV 050291. The foregoing list shows only those license numbers Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC (“Johnson Controls”) is required by law to include on marketing materials. A comprehensive list of licenses held by Johnson Controls is available on www.johnsoncontrols.com. California Customers Only: Upon completion of the installation of the alarm system, the alarm company shall thoroughly instruct the purchaser in the proper use of the alarm system. Failure by the licensee, without legal excuse, to substantially commence work within 20 days from the approximate date specified in the agreement when the work will begin is a violation of the Alarm Company Act.

©2023 JOHNSON CONTROLS. All rights reserved.

-11-

ADDITIONAL TERMS

AND CONDITIONS

DATE: 11/21/2023
Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC (“Johnson
Controls”)

Roland Gomez
2023 Chicago Ave,
Riverside, CA 92507
Tele. No. (951) 538-3409
City of Jurupa Valley
d/b/a: City Of Jurupa Valley
(“Customer”)
Customer Billing Information
8930 Limonite Ave,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn:

Tele. No.

Customer Premises Serviced
8930 Limonite Ave,
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn:

Tele. No.

Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, Johnson Controls and Customer agree as follows:

Terms and Conditions
Johnson Controls agrees to waive the contract termination charges for a Customer location where Johnson Controls has failed to repair a System, which is partially or wholly inoperative due to faulty, damaged, or worn-out components. This waiver will apply only when Johnson Controls has failed to repair the system within sixty days of receipt of written notification. Upon receipt of a thirty (30) day notice to terminate, Johnson Controls will issue a credit or a refund for the service charges related to that service and affected location, during the period when the System was partially or wholly inoperative, but not to exceed one-hundred and twenty (120) days. Term = 5 Year Electrical Power. Customer is responsible for providing 110V power at each device location.

Annual Service Charge – Initial Term. Johnson Controls agrees to honor the Annual Service Charge for Monitoring Services specified in this Agreement for the Initial Term of the Agreement. Thereafter, the Annual Service Charge may be increased by the increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners (“CPI-W”), All Items, U.S. City Average for the prior twelve (12) month period or 5%, whichever is less.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, except those expressly modified herein, shall remain in full force and effect.

COMMERCIAL SECURITY AS A SERVICE

AGREEMENT

TOWN NO.
0198-RIVERSIDE, CA

CUSTOMER NO.
119846407

JOB NO.

PO NO.

ESTIMATE NO.
1-6UZGZLG

_________________________________
Julie Brandt
President, Building Solutions, NA

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Julie Brandt, President, Building Solutions, purs uant to the authority vested in her by: (i) a Sub-Delegation of Authority from the President of Johnson Controls, Inc. , a Wisconsin corporation (“JCI” ), dated April 24, 2023, (ii) an Incumbency Certificate and Delegation of Authority from the general partner of Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP , a Delaware limited partnership (“ JCFP”), dated April 24, 2023, and (iii) a Written Consent in Lieu of Special Meeting of the Management Board from Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC , a Delaware limited liability company (“JCSS”), dated April 24, 2023, hereby authorizes:

Andrew Krynen
Vice President, Area General Manager

(the “
Delegate”) to perform, on behalf of each of JCI, JCFP and JCSS, the acts described below:

To execute and deliver any and all contracts for the performance of work, sale of goods, and furnishing of services, and any other instruments in connection therewith and in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with the current Global Approval Authority Matrix.

This authority does not extend to:

a. contracts without a (i) financial cap on liability, (ii) fault-based indemnity, and (iii) waiver of consequential damages, unless approved in accordance with the current Global Approval Authority Matrix; b. further sub-delegation of the above acts absent necessary approvals in writing; c. the execution of surety, performance or bid bonds;
d. the signing of any notes, contracts, or any other agreement to borrow money in the name of JCI, JCFP and JCSS, or any form of guaranty for the payment or performance of obligations of any subsidiary, affiliate, or joint venture of JCI, JCFP and JCSS; or
e. the signing, on behalf of JCI, JCFP and JCSS, of any deeds, abstracts, offers to purchase or any other instruments pertaining to the purchase or sale of real pro perty.

Any actions taken by such Delegate within the scope of acts authorized herein taken between the date of expiration of any prior delegation of authority and the date hereof are hereby rati fied, confirmed and approved as the acts and deeds of JCI, JCF P and JCSS.

This authority shall remain in full force and effect for one year from the date of issue unless earlier terminated by JCI, JCFP or JCSS or shall automatically terminate upon the end of Delegate ’s employment with any affiliated company of Johnson Controls International plc.

Signed at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 15 th day of May, 2023.

Johnson Controls, Inc. Johnson Controls ATTESTS:

Fire Protection LP, and Johnson Controls
Security Solutions LLC
______________________________________
Steve W. Keane

Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Johnson Controls, Inc.

______________________________________
Heather A. Brown

Vice President and Secretary
Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP

Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC

P
age | 1
ST

AFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.C

APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE COMMUN ITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND APPROVE

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH UNITED SIKH

MISSION FOR THE CITY -OWNED FOOD PANTRY BUILDING
LOCATED AT 5626 MISSION BOULEVARD
RECO

MMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council approve the use of the City’s CDBG -CV funds to pay for the installation of kitchen equipment in the City-owned Food Pantry building. 2) That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment with the United Sikh Mission to operate, maintain and repair kitchen equipment in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.
3) That the City Council authorize the Interim Finance Director to make any necessary budget adjustments.

BACKGROUND
On May 21, 2020, the Council approved the acquisition of a building 5626 Mission Blvd. from the County of Riverside and legally took possession on July 1, 2020. Although there was no purchase cost to the City, the City was responsible for the ongoing costs associated with maintaining the facility. At the time of acquisition no programming or use of the facility was taking place because of COVID-19 mandates.

As Covid-19 restrictions began to loosen in the Spring of 2021, the City Council directed staff to begin meeting with local non- profit organizations in an effort to determine what types of uses are most needed in the community. Staff met with several local non-profit and governmental organizations over the next few months including Jurupa Valley Unified School District, Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District, Reach Out / Healthy Jurupa

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

Valley, First Five Riverside, Riverside County Parks and Open Space District, Jurupa Mountains Discovery Center, United Sikh Mission (USM) and Jurupa Valley Boxing Club.

On September 16, 2021, City Council directed staff to negotiate exclusively with the United Sikh Mission to operate a food distribution and pantry at 5625 Mission Blvd.

At the start of the global pandemic, members of the Sikh community from the Jurupa Valley Temple took immediate action to alleviate the need for food distribution to those in the community who were suffering economically. What started out as an operation serving approximately 175 meals daily outside of the temple grew into a significant project that provided as many as 40,000 meals per week. During those months, residents thanked and praised the efforts of the Sikh community, voicing their concerns about the need for a food pantry in the heart of the City of Jurupa Valley.

In recognition of the unmet need in the community and in the interest of developing a long- range plan to feed the hungry , the U nited Sikh Mission (U SM) began to discuss the possibility of a permanent food bank for the residents of Jurupa Valley. According to the USM the City facility is an ideal location for a USM food bank because of its proximity to the Sikh Gurdwara temple, which has been a valued community organization since 1985.

The USM is a philanthropic charitable organization incorporated in Southern California and also in Punjab, India since 2005 for the purposes of Human and Environmental Welfare.

In addition to food distribution, the United Sikh Mission have helped more than 200,000 people receive quality eye care services. The eye care service consists of more than 25,000 eye surgeries and 140,000 pairs of glasses. It is their desire to begin with a food pantry and then possibly grow their services with eye care, medical services, clothing and youth services.

On October 21, 2021 the City Council approved a contract with the USM to operate a food pantry. They provide approximately 500 meals per month directly to those in need.

ANALYSIS

In February 2022, Ci ty Staff developed recommendations for the City Council’s Community Development Block G rant COVID -19 (CDBG -CV3) program . This CDBG - CV3 funding has strict requirements, and must be used to mitigate the effects of COVID-

19. Any unspent CDBG funds at the local level are returned to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

On March 17, 2022, the City Coun cil awarded CDBG-CV3 funding to USM, for the purchase of kitchen equipment for the food pantry. CDBG-CV3 is a Federal reimbursement grant program . Staff’s original recommendation was for the USM to purchase the equipment; however, Staff now recommends that the C ity purchase the equipment since the City is in a better postion financially to purchase upfront and receive reimbursement from HUD. The building is owned by the City and the City will own the equipment regardless of who may have an agreement to lease the facility in the future. In addition, the City has the ability to manage the CDBG paperwork and process as they

Page | 3

have years of St aff experience and the City has pricing advantage because of our City Purchasing Department expertise.

It is Staff recommendation that the City purchase and install the kitchen equipment directly as a Public Facility Improvement, with the use of CDBG-CV funds. Given that the change of this activity is 8.6 percent ($50,000 of $580,000) of the total CDBG-CV budget, the City would not need to go through the substantial amendment process of the City’s 2018-2022 Consolidated Plan/2019-2020 Annual Action Plan.

This agreement allows the City to purchase and install the kitchen equipment with CDBG- CV grant funds. This kitchen equipment will be owned by the City for the life of the equipment. In addition, the Agreement with the USM stipulates that the USM will be responsible for the ongoing maintenance, repair, and any utility costs associated with the kitchen equipment . In addition, given that the funds for the purchase of the kitchen equipment used are CDBG -CV this agreement will stipulate that the kitchen equipment must be used for persons affected by the coronavirus. The USM has agreed to these conditions upon City Council approval.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City’s CDBG-CV3 allocation provides $50,000 for the purchase of kitchen equipment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve agreement by and between the City of Jurupa Valley and United Sikh Mission

2. Provide Staff with alternate direction

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE********************

Draft: October 4, 2021
-1-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc

LICENSE AND OPERATING AGREEMENT FOR USE OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATED AT 5626
MISSION BL. BETWEEN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND UNITED

SIKH MISSION
THIS LICENSE AND OPERATING AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of October 21, 2021 by and between the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation, and United Sikh Mission, Inc. a California nonprofit corporation ("Non-Profit"), sometimes collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Parties". In consideration of the mutual promises made herein, the Parties agree as follows:

1. RECITALS. The Parties agree that this Agreement is made for the following purposes of and based on the following facts:

A. The City is the owner of record for certain real property located at 5626 Mission Bl., Jurupa Valley, California (“Property”).

B. The City owns the community center situated on the Property along with the furniture, fixtures and equipment located therein ("Center").

C. The furniture, fixtures and equipment located in the Center is listed on Exhibit A, Existing Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment.

D. The City has the capability and authority to operate, maintain and provide programs for the Center whether directly or through a contract with a qualified Non-Profit and where such programs and services are in the vital and best interest of the residents of the City and the community surrounding the Center.

E. Non-Profit provides a wide variety of public social service programs and services to the community and Non-Profit desires to provide such programs at the Center.

F. The City and Non-Profit desire to enter into a License and Operating Agreement and for the purpose of providing community service programs and other services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

2. NON-PROFIT’S USE OF THE CENTER. City hereby grants to Non-Profit and its agents, employees and contractors the exclusive right to enter onto and use the Property and the Center for the purpose of the providing community programs and services, more particularly described in Exhibit B, Scope of Work, and for no other purposes except as amended and approved by the City. It is expressly understood that this License does not in any way whatsoever grant or convey any permanent easement, lease, fee or other real property interest in the Center to the Non-Profit.

3. TERM.

A. Initial Term. The Term of this Agreement will commence on October 21, 2021 and will end on October 20, 2026, subject to an option to extend as provided in Subsection 3.B and to early termination as provided in Subsection 3.C.

Draft: October 4, 2021

-2-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
B. Options to Extend Term. Non-Profit has one option to extend the Term of the Agreement by an additional five (5) years, subject to written approval by the City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion. Non-Profit shall notify the City Manager in writing six months prior to the end of the initial term or an approved extension if it decides not to exercise the an option under this License Agreement.

C. T ermination .
1) City's Right to Terminate.
a) City may terminate this Agreement for any reason, or no reason, in its sole and absolute discretion, by giving one hundred eighty (180) days written notice to Non- Profit.
b) If during the term of this Agreement, the Center is damaged, whether or not from a risk covered by insurance, and subject to the other provisions of this Agreement regarding termination, City shall have the option, but shall not be obligated to make the repairs necessary to restore the Center and all the improvements thereon, to a condition for occupancy or use comparable to the condition thereof before such damage occurred. However, City may determine in its sole discretion, that if it is not feasible to make the necessary repairs or restoration, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement. c) City may also terminate this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Section 13, Default, of this Agreement.
d) Upon any such termination, Non-Profit must surrender the Center and all equipment and improvements constructed in the Center (other than trade fixtures or other removable fixtures owned by Non-Profit) to be left in good and clean condition and shall become the property of City or the City at no cost or expense to the City. 2) Non-Profit's Right to Terminate. Non-Profit may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason by giving written notice to City at least ninety (90) days prior to the effective date of such termination. Upon such termination, Non-Profit must surrender the Center and all improvements and Equipment in good and clean condition.

4. CONSIDERATION. Non-Profit shall not be obligated to pay any rent or fees to the City for the use of the Property and the Center during the term of this Agreement. City gratefully acknowledges, recognizes and agrees that the Non-Profit will be providing community services to the City and the community through its use of the Center and will be responsible for the maintenance of the Center. The value of such contributions, services and work greatly exceeds the fair market rental of the Center.

5. OBLIGATIONS OF NON-PROFIT.

A. Operations. Non-Profit shall be obligated to provide programs and services to the community described in Exhibit B, Scope of Work.

Draft: October 4, 2021

-3-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
B. Maintenance, Repair and Replacement of Center. Non-Profit shall maintain, repair and replace, at its sole cost and expense, all portions of the Property and the Center and its building systems in good condition in accordance with customary and reasonable commercial maintenance standards and in accordance with all applicable laws, health, fire and safety ordinances and laws, environmental regulations, American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and comparable California laws and regulations, and such further law, ordinances, rules and regulations as may be binding upon Non-Profit. This obligation includes, without limitation, the following:
1) Maintain, repair and replace all plumbing, electrical, heating/ventilation/air conditioning systems (HVAC); floor coverings, window coverings; landscaping (including landscaping sprinklers); indoor and outdoor painting, windows, and roof systems.
2) Regular janitorial and cleaning services;
3) Security services.
4) Removal of graffiti within 24 hours of discover.
5) Utilities, including, but not limited to, electrical, telephone, cable TV/Internet, gas, sewer and water.
6) Trash collection.
7) Fire, burglary and security alarm systems.
8) Maintain, repair and replace parking lot and outdoor lighting and landscaping.

C. No Waste or Damage. Non-Profit shall not cause waste or damage to the improvements and natural resources thereon by its employees, contractors or agents, except reasonable wear and tear is acceptable.

D. C ity Approval of Improvements. Any alter ations, improvements, or installation of fixtures to be undertaken by Non-Profit shall have the prior written approval of the City Manager after Non-Profit has submitted, in writing, a work plan for any such proposed alterations, improvements, or fixtures to City manager.

E. R estriction on Non -Profit’s Use. Non-Profit shall strictly adhere to the following restrictions:
1) Non-Profit shall not place or dump garbage, trash or refuse anywhere upon or within the Property, except for self-contained trash receptacles that are maintained by the Non-Profit.

Draft: October 4, 2021

-4-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
2) Non-Profit shall not commit or create, or knowingly suffer to be committed or created, any waste, hazardous condition and/or nuisance to occur upon the Property.
3) Non-Profit shall exercise reasonable diligence in the protection of the Center against damage or destruction by fire, vandalism, water or other cause. 4) Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, but prior to its relinquishment to City, Non-Profit shall, at its own cost and expense, remove any debris generated by its use and the Center shall be returned in a clean and neat condition. 5) Non-Profit shall not to damage Center in the process of performing the permitted use and activities and, if damaged, repair and replace any portion of the Center or furniture, fixtures or equipment so damaged.

F. City Inspection. City and its representatives, employees, agents or independent contractors may enter and inspect the Center or any portion thereof or any improvements thereon at any reasonable time to verify Non-Profit's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

6. CONTRACTING WITH THIRD PARTIES. Non-Profit may enter into agreements with qualified third parties for the purpose of providing any of the services or programs in connection with the uses permitted to be performed on the Center as described in Section 4 with prior consent from the City Manager and/or designee. All such agreements shall contain provisions necessary to protect the City, its officers, employees, successors, and assigns from any liability arising out of the provision of services, including but not limited to, indemnification and insurance provisions set forth in this Agreement. The term of any permit, contact, or other agreement entered into by Non-Profit affecting or related to the Center shall not exceed the term of this Agreement.

7. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. During the term of this Agreement Non-Profit shall pay, or cause to be paid, any and all applicable real and personal property taxes, general and special assessments and other charges of every description as may be levied on or assessed against the Center, improvements to the Center, or personal property owned by Non-Profit located on or in the Center by reason of Non-Profit's operation of the Property. Non-Profit acknowledges that it may be subject to a possessory interest tax in accordance with the California Revenue and Taxation Code.

8. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS; NONDISCRIMINATION.

A. Non-Profit shall, at its sole cost and expense, obtain any and all necessary permits and shall fully comply with all applicable ordinances, state and federal laws associated with the provision of the public programs and services. Non-Profit further agrees to use the Center in material compliance with all laws now in force or which may hereafter be in force relative to its use as outlined in Section 6 above, including without limitation compliance with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations, as well as all covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement.

Draft: October 4, 2021

-5-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
B. Non-Profit shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.

9. INDEMNIFICATION. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Non-Profit shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its directors, officers, employees, appointed or elected officials, agent or representatives from any liability whatsoever, to the extent based or asserted upon acts, omissions or any services of Non-Profit, its officers, employees, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death or any other element of any kind or nature whatsoever arising from the performance of Non-Profit, its officers, agents, employees, agents or representatives from this Agreement. Non-Profit shall defend, at its sole expense, all costs and fees including, but not limited, to attorney’ fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards, the City, its directors, officers, employees, appointed officials, agents or representatives in any claim or action to the extent based upon such alleged acts or omissions.

A. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by Non- Profit. Non-Profit shall, at their sole cost, have the right to use counsel of their own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes Non-Profit indemnification to City as set forth herein, provided, however, that any settlement requiring improvements to the property or maintenance obligations beyond the term of this Agreement, shall require the approval of the City.

B. Non-Profit's obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when Non-Profit has provided to City the appropriate form of dismissal relieving City from any liability for the action or claim involved.

C. The specified insurance limits required in this Agreement shall in no way limit or circumscribe Non-Profit's obligation to indemnify and hold harmless the City herein from third 'party claims.

D. In the event there is conflict between this clause and California Civil Code Section 2782, this clause shall be interpreted to comply with Civil Code 2782. Such interpretation shall not relieve Non-Profit from indemnifying the City to the fullest extent allowed by law.

10. INSURANCE. Without limiting or diminishing Non-Profit's obligation to the indemnify or hold the City and City harmless, Non-Profit shall procure and maintain or cause to be maintained, at its sole cost and expense, the following insurance coverage's during the term of this Agreement for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Non-Profit, its agents, representatives, or employees.

A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

Draft: October 4, 2021

-6-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Non-Profit owns no automobiles, a non- owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. If the Non-Profit has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker’s compensation insurance is not required, but Non-Profit shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.
4) Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Non-Profit’s profession.

B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Non-Profit shall maintain limits no less than:
1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3) Worker’s Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer’s Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate.

C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000 unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

D. O
ther Insurance Provisions. The general liability and aut omobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (“Additional Insured”) shall be covered as insured’s as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Non-Profit; products and completed operations of the Non-Profit; premises owned, occupied or used by the Non-Profit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Non-Profit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds.

Draft: October 4, 2021

-7-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
2) For any claims related to this project, the Non-Profit’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Non-Profit’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds. 4) The Non-Profit’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Non-Profit of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Non-Profit shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

E. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

F. V erification of Coverage. Non -Profit shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by or acceptable to the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City’s forms, the Non-Profit’s insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

G. M
odifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable the City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this section.

11. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Non-Profit shall not discharge, dispose of, or permit to escape, any drainage water, non-point source runoff, raw sewage, fuel, or waste of any kind, within or outside the Center or the Property that could result in destruction of habitat or the contamination or pollution of said Center or Property. Non-Profit shall at all times comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, orders, and regulations, as may be amended with respect to the proper discharge of refuse, garbage, sewage effluent, wastes, storm water runoff, and any and all other pollutants, including soil sediments, and shall cause its employees, agents and other persons or entities under its control to comply fully with such laws, orders, and regulations.

Draft: October 4, 2021

-8-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc

12. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Non-Profit shall not use or allow anyone else to use the Property or the Center to generate, manufacture, refine, transport, treat, store, handle, recycle, release, or dispose of any hazardous material, other than as reasonably necessary for the operation of its operations and activities as contemplated under this Agreement. The term "hazardous material" means any hazardous substance, material, or waste including, but not limited to, those listed in 49 CFR 172.101 (U.S. Department of Transportation), the Cal/EPA Chemical Lists, or petroleum products and their derivatives. However, this shall not apply to the use of petroleum products and related substances incidental to operation of motorized equipment and vehicles whose operation on the premises is contemplated by this Agreement. Non-Profit shall immediately notify City in writing in the event of any release of hazardous material, violation of any environmental law, or actions brought by third parties against Non-Profit alleging environmental damage. Non-Profit shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all damages of any nature (including payment of attorneys’ fees) related to or arising out of the discharge or release of hazardous materials caused by Non-Profit or any person or entity under its control.

13. DEFAULT.

A. Non-Profit shall be deemed in default of this Agreement if Non-Profit uses the Center for any purpose other than that authorized in the Agreement, fails to maintain the Center or the improvements in the manner provided for in the Agreement, fails to comply with or perform any other covenant, condition, provision or restriction provided for in the Agreement, abandons the Property, allows the Center to be attached, levied upon, or seized under legal process, or if Non-Profit files or commits an act of bankruptcy, has a receiver or liquidator appointed to take possession of the Property, or commits or permits waste on the Property.

B. Non-Profit shall cure any defaults within thirty (30) days of receipt of a written notice by the City to remedy any and all defaults. In the event that any default is of such a nature that the same cannot reasonably be cured within the thirty (30) day period described above, then the cure period shall be extended by such further reasonable period (not to exceed an additional 90 days) so long as Non-Profit commences the cure within the thirty (30) day period described above and thereafter diligently prosecutes the cure to completion. In the event that Non-Profit's fails to cure the noticed default, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and retake possession of the Center together with all additions, alterations, and improvements thereto by providing Non-Profit thirty (30) days' notice of its intent to terminate. City shall also retain all rights to seek any and all remedies at law or in equity available in the event Non-Profit is in default. Upon the giving of notice of termination, all Non-Profit's rights in the Center and improvements shall terminate. Promptly after notice of termination, Non-Profit shall surrender and vacate the Center and all improvements in good and clean condition.

14. USE OF CITY NAME. Non Profit may not use of the City name, logo, or other identifying marks for events, exhibits and other uses without the prior written approval of the City Manager.

15. GENERAL
Draft: October 4, 2021

-9-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
A. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice.

Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Ave.

Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: City Manager
To Non-Profit: United Sikh Mission

B. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein as though set forth in full:
1) Exhibit A Existing Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment. 2) Exhibit B Scope of Work.

C. Assignment. Non-Profit shall not assign the rights and obligations of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Council. Such consent shall be in the sole and absolute discretion of the City Council.

D. W aiver . Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's rights to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter.

E. O
pportunity to Inspect Center; Acceptance As -is. Prior to entering into this Agreement, Non-Profit represents and acknowledges that it has had a full and complete opportunity to inspect the Center and its furniture, fixtures and equipment and to determine the condition of the Center’s building systems with professionals of its choice. Therefore, based solely on the reports of its professional inspectors, the Non-Profit enters into this Agreement and accepts the condition of the Center in is “as-is condition.” F. G
overning Law; Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The City and Non-Profit agree that the Agreement has been entered into in Riverside County, California, and that if any action or Draft: October 4, 2021

-10-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
proceeding is commenced to enforce or interpret this Agreement, venue shall be filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, in Riverside County, California.

G. Prohibited Interest. No City Council member, officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development or of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Non-Profit, or Non-Profit’s sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Non-Profit hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Non-Profit or Non-Profit’s sub-Non- Profits on this project. Non-Profit further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

H. I
nterpretation. The Parties hereto have negotiated this Agreement at arms -length and have been advised by their respective attorneys, or if not represented by an attorney, represent that they had an opportunity to be so represented and no provision contained herein shall be construed against City solely because it prepared this Agreement in its executed form.

I. A
mendment. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended without the written consent of both Non-Profit and the City incorporated in a written amendment to the Agreement.

J. B inding On Successors. The terms and conditions herein contained shall apply to and bind the heirs, successors in interest, executors, administrators, representatives, and assigns of all the parties hereto.

K. A
uthority To Execute. The persons ex ecuting this Agreement or exhibits attached hereto on behalf of the Parties to this Agreement hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the respective Parties to this Agreement to the performance of its obligations herein.

L. E
ntire Ag reement. This Agreement and those documents incorporated herein by reference or attached: (i) constitutes the entire Agreement, supersedes all other prior Agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the Parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement; (ii)
M. N
o Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to confer upon any person other than the Parties to this Agreement any rights or remedies under this Agreement.

Signature Provisions on Following Page

Draft: October 4, 2021

-11-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

______________________________________
Rod B. Butler
City Manager

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

NON-PROFIT
UNITED SIKH MISSION, INC., a California
non-profit corporation

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Draft: October 4, 2021

-12-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc
[NOTE: The Non-Profit must be represented by two individuals who shall execute this Agreement on behalf of the corporation as follows: (A) one from the corporation's "Operational Group" (Chair of the Board, President, or a Vice-President) and; (B) one from the corporation's "Financial Group" (Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer). See California Corporations Code section 313.]

Draft: October 4, 2021

-13-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc

EXHIBIT A

FIXTURES, FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT

Intentionally Left Blank

Draft: October 4, 2021

-14-
12774-0001\2571907v3.doc

EXHIBIT B

SCOPE OF WORK
United Sikh Mission Activities City of Jurupa Valley Contract Deliverables

Monthly USM Convening

Facilitate a monthly USM meeting to unite volunteers, city staff and community members to reflect on past drives and prepare for future ones.

Action Team Meetings:

Facilitate 12 Action Team meetings to support the USM’s mission by completing the following objectives outlined below:

Distribution USM will provide food directly to those in need. 500 hot meals will be provided. We estimate providing at least 500 meals per month and focus directed to Jurupa Valley
residents.

Start date will be the week of Christmas 2021.

Our plans are to expand as we grow in volunteers and
material. We anticipate 10 additional pantries picking up food weekly to distribute food as well.

Fundraising

USM plans to have multiple channels in which people will be able to donate/support the food drive. We plan to set up a tab linked on our website of options for people who wish to see how the donations made will be used in providing food to those in need.

Outreach Outreach will be done throughout 2022 and 2023 using flyers, public service announcements, and networking with local community leaders. Fundraising events will be held periodically to raise funds as well.

Partnerships Will work with non-profits such as Path of life to assist in needed food service and distribution
Updates Quarterly Updates will be given to the City Council.

Page 1 of 2 ends

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AND OPERATING AGREEMENT

FOR USE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER
LOCATED AT 5626 MISSION BOULEVARD BETWEEN CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY AND UNITED SIKH MISSION
This Second Amendment (“Second Amendment”) to the October 21, 2021 License and Operating Agreement (“Agreement”) between the City of Jurupa Valley, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and United Sikh Mission, Inc. , a California nonprof it corporation (“Non-Profit”) is dated May 5, 2022, and is between City and Non-Profit.

RECITALS
A. City and Non-Profit entered into the Agreement granting Non-Profit and its agents, employees and contractors the exclusive right to enter onto and use the community center located at 5626 Mission Boulevard (the “Center”) for the purpose of the providing community programs and services.

B. City and Non-Profit desire to amend the Agreement to update Non-Profit’s obligations to include the maintenance, and repair of any kitchen equipment purchased by the City for use at the Center for residents that are affected by COVID-19 pandemic.

The parties therefore agree as follows:

Section 1. Section 5.B of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding Paragraph 9 to read as follows:
“Maintain, and repair any kitchen equipment purchased by the City for use at the Center. Non-Profit shall be responsible for any utility costs associated with such kitchen equipment.”
Section 2. The person or persons executing this Second Amendment on behalf of Non-Profit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Second Amendment on behalf of Non -Profit and has the authority to bind Non -Profit to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

Section 3. Except as expressly modified or supplemented by this Second Amendment, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict betw een the provisions of this Second Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this First Amendment shall control. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

Page 2 of 2 ends

The parties are signing this Second Amendment on the date stated in the introductory clause.

ATTEST:

By:

Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

By:

Rod B. Butler, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
UNITED SIKH MISSION, INC.

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.D
RE

SOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE

JURUPA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE RUBIDOUX

COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT UTILITY RATE PAYBACK

ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-04, entitled:

A

RESOLUITON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY AND THE JURUPA COMMUNITY S ERVICES DISTRICT

AND THE RUBIDOUX COMMUNTIY SERVICES DISTRICT FOR

ADMINISTRATION OF THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT UTILITY RATE

PAYBACK ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
B

ACKGROUND
O
n March 21, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) into law. The $1.9 trillion package is intended to directly combat the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic impacts. ARPA allocates $350 billion towards the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) as fiscal relief for state and local governments.

T
he Treasury’s Final Rule provided greater flexibility and simplicity for recipients to fight the pandemic and support families and businesses struggling with its impacts and to maintain vital services amid revenue shortfalls. Recipients are required to repor t on a broad set of eligible uses and associated Expenditure Categories. The seven main Expenditure Categories are listed below:

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

1. Public Health

2. Negative Economic Impact

3. Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity

4. Premium Pay

5. Infrastructure

6. Revenue Replacement

7. Administrative

On August 18, 2022 the City Council approved the City’s ARPA Expenditure Plan which effectively and efficiently allocates this one -time, block grant style, funding from the Federal Government. The ARPA Expenditure Plan was developed based upon the value- based principles of the ARPA program.

Approved Expenditure Plan

Roadway Deferred Maintenance & Infrastructure Deficit Improvement Program $20 Mil • Street, Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements
• City Wide ADA Assessment

Broadband Matching Funds $2.5 Mil

City Facility Pathogen Prevention Improvements $2.8 Mil • HVAC Replacement (HEPA+Germicidal)
• Sanitary Touch Free Restrooms
• Emergency Back-up Power
• Energy Saving upgrades
• Contactless Service Delivery Infrastructure

Housing Crisis Mitigation $1.2 Mil
• Affordable Housing Assistance
• Services for Unhoused Persons
• Crisis Stabilization Units

Direct Resident Assistance $1 Mil
• Jurupa Community Services District-Rate Payback/Assistance Program • Rubidoux Community Services District-Rate Payback/Assistance Program

Local Economic Assistance Program (LEAP)-Assistance to Businesses $0 .5 Mil • Revenue Replacement
• Job Retention
• Job Creation
Total $28.0 Mil

Page | 3

In accordance with the guidance provided by the City Council during the ARPA Expenditure Plan adoption, each specific project contained within the ARPA budget will come before the City Council for consideration and approval during subsequent meetings.

ANALYSIS

One of the Council adopted ARPA Expenditure Plan Program provides $1,000,000 in direct residential assistance by way of a Utility Rate Rebate. With 27,207 households in the City it is estimated that each household will receive a rebate in the amount of $35.00.

Because the City of Jurupa Valley does not provide utility services, the City recommends partnering with both the Rubidoux Community Services District (RCSD) and the Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) to provide an automatic direct utility rebate.

For those residents that do not receive water bills directly (Mobile Homes and Apartments), an on-line application will be made available.

Payment to residents that do not receive utility bills from RSCD or JCSD will have the opportunity to fill out an on-line application and receive a pre-paid Credit Card. PrePaid USA is teaming up with the City of Jurupa Valley to give back to the community by waiving the $2.00 per card processing fee, a value of approximately $10,000 in savings.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

Funding for t his program, in the amount of $1,0 00,000, is included in the City’s ARPA Expenditure Plan that was adopted by the City Council on August 18, 2022. If approved, funding will be appropriated from Federal ARPA Funds Account 2520.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and JCSD and RCSD for the Utility Rate Payback Program.

2. Provide alternate direction to Staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

-1-
12774-0001\2906420v2.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE JURUPA COMMUNITY

SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE RUBIDOUX COMMUNITY

SERVICES DISTRICT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE AMERICAN

RESCUE PLAN ACT UTILITY RATE PAYBACK ASSISTANCE

PROGRAM

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”). ARPA established the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, which together make up the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”) program. ARPA provides for 130.2 billion in funding for local governments to provide area-specific assistance to respond to and mitigate the negative effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on their communities.
(b) The U.S. Department of Treasury issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the SLFRF program on May 10, 2021 which allowed the disbursement of funds to begin. The Interim Final Rule underwent several changes to the provisions and resulted in significant changes which allow for greater flexibility in the use of funds. The Final Rule was published on January 27, 2022, and became effective April 1, 2022. (c) The City of Jurupa Valley’s ARPA allocation is $28,077, 013, which was received in two installments from the U.S. Department of Treasury. (d) On August 18, 2022 the City Council approved the City’s ARPA Expenditure Plan which effectively and efficiently allocates this one -time, block grant style, funding from the Federal Government.
(e) The City of Jurupa Valley’s ARPA Expenditure Plan included $1,000,000 in direct residential assistance by way of a Utility Rate Payback Program to provide the residents of Jurupa Valley with a direct rebate by way of their utility bill. (f) The City of Jurupa Va lley City Council is partnering with the Jurupa Community Services District and the Rubidoux Community Services District to provide the residents of Jurupa Valley with a direct rebate by way of their utility bill in order to implement the Utility Rate Payback Program.
(g) The City of Jurupa Valley will partner with Prepaid USA to distribute Pre- Paid Credit cards to those residents that do not receive water or Sewer bills from Jurupa Community Services District or Rubidoux Community Services District in order to implement the

-2-
12774-0001\2906420v2.doc
Utility Rate Payback Program for those residents. PrePaid USA is waiving the $2.00 per card charge resulting in an estimated $10,000 savings to the Utility Rate Payback Program.

Section 2. City Manager to Approve Implementing Agreements. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute for and on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, the American Rescue Plan Act Utility Bill Assistance Grant Agreements with Jurupa Community Services District, Rubidoux Comm unity Services District and Pre Paid USA allocating funds in order to implement the Utility Rate Payback Program up to the maximum amount allocated by the Council for the Program . The City Manager shall also be authorized to take all actions convenient or necessary to implement the Utility Rate Payback Program Section 3. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of February 2024.

______________________________
Guillermo Silva
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-3-
12774-0001\2906420v2.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 202 4-04 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 1 5th day of February 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of February 2024.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT UTILITY BILL ASSISTA NCE GRANT

AGREEMENT
This AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of February 15, 2024, between the CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a California municipal corporation (the "City"), and Rubidoux Community Services District, a community services district organized and operating pursuant to California Government Code Sections 61000 et seq. (the "Subrecipient "). In consideration of the purposes and terms of this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

1. Recitals. The Parties agree that this Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:

A. On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”). ARPA established the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, which together make up the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”) program. ARPA provides for $130.2 billion in funding for local governments to provide area-specific assistance to respond to and mitigate the negative effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on their communities. The City will receive approximately $28,077,013.00 in ARPA funding.

B. Based on the availability of ARPA-allocated funds, the City has decided to provide funding to the Subrecipient to further the purposes of the ARPA, as provided in this Agreement.

C. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote public health and address the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing two-hundred eight thousand, nine hundred fifteen dollars ($208,915) in ARPA funds to the Subrecipient for utility account credits for Jurupa Valley residents within the Subrecipient’s service area.

D. Subrecipient provides water, sewer and trash services for people within a portion of the City of Jurupa Valley.

E. During the COVID-19 Pandemic many customers of Subrecipient and other people in the City of Jurupa Valley were unable to pay all or portions of their water, sewer or trash bills or were otherwise adversely affected economically through loss of jobs, inability to work, need to care for ill family members, their own illness resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

F. This Agreement will provide a means by which the City and Subrecipient can provide some financial assistance to those people in Jurupa Valley adversely affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic and customers of the Subrecipient.

2. Term. This Agreement shall become effective on February 15, 2024 (the “Effective Date”] and shall terminate on December 31, 2026, subject to early termination under section 7 (“Term of Agreement”).

3. Grant of ARPA Funds. The City shall disburse to the Subrecipient a total sum not to exceed providing two-hundred eight thousand, nine hundred fifteen dollars ($208,915) in accordance with section 4 of this Agreement. The funds disbursed by the City under this Agreement are referred to as “ARPA funds.” In no instance will the City be liable for any

payments or costs in excess of this amount, for any unauthorized or ineligible costs, or for costs incurred after the termination date described in Section 2.

4. Disbursement of ARPA Funds. The City will make payments to the Subrecipient of the ARPA Funds as follows:

A. Subrecipient shall file a written request with the City for disbursal of all or part of the ARPA Funds for Utility Account Credits which shall include a declaration that Subrecipient is ready to use the ARPA Funds for the Authorized activities. City shall disburse the ARPA Funds to Subrecipient for Utility Account Credits within fifteen (15) calendar days following this written request.
1) On a monthly basis, the Subrecipient shall provide the City with a written report on the progress made on the Authorized Activities in accordance with section 8(l) of this Agreement.
2) The City will notify the Subrecipient within fifteen (15) calendar days following receipt of its request and written report of any circumstances or data identified by the City that would cause withholding of approval and subsequent payment.

B. On a monthly basis, Subrecipient shall provide to City a detailed and properly documented invoice for reimbursement of allowable expenses in administering this Agreement as provided in Attachments A, Authorized Activities, and Attachment B, Approved Budget . The invoice shall include a detailed accounting of costs already incurred in sufficient detail for the City, in its opinion, to substantiate the costs.

5. Authorized Uses. The following terms apply to the Subrecipient's activities and expenditures related to this Agreement:

A. The Subrecipient may seek reimbursement solely for costs it incurs that are necessary to carry out the activities listed in Attachment ”A” (“Authorized Activities”) in accordance with the budget listed in Attachment “B” (“Approved Budget”). If a term included in Attachment “A” is stated as an obligation, then the Subrecipient is obligated to perform the term under this agreement.

B. The Subrecipient may seek reimbursement solely for eligible costs that it incurs between the Effective Date of this Agreement and December 31, 2026. If Subrecipient receives a refund or credit for any cost for which it received a payment of ARPA funds, Subrecipient shall return ARPA funds in an amount equal to the refund or credit to the City by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9 no later than ten (10) calendar days following receipt of such refund or credit, unless otherwise agreed to, in writing, by the City.

C. When incurring costs for which it will seek reimbursement under this Agreement, the Subrecipient is subject to the restrictions set forth in the ARPAA, as well as the Department of the Treasury's Final Rule, FAQs, Fact Sheet, and Compliance and Reporting Guidance (collectively the “ARPA Guidance”), as the Guidance may be amended from time to time. The ARPA Guidance can be found at
https://home.treasury.gov/policy -
issues/coronavirus/assistance -for- state -local -and -tribal- governments/ state -and -local - fiscal -recovery -funds .

D. Any costs that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable are subject to repayment by the Subrecipient to the City within sixty (60) calendar days unless the City approves in writing an alternative repayment plan.

E. The Subrecipient shall not use the ARPA funds to supplant funding provided by the City to the Subrecipient under any other agreement. The Subrecipient shall include a term in every grant subaward agreement and contract that prohibits the subrecipient or contractor from using ARPA funds to supplant funding provided by the City directly or indirectly to the subrecipient or contractor.

F. If the Subrecipient has received other ARPA funds from the City or any other entity, or has received other federal funds (e.g., Coronavirus Relief Act funds, payroll protection act loan, etc.), Subrecipient shall not use the ARPA funds awarded pursuant to this agreement to pay for direct or indirect costs already covered by the other federal funds or ARPA fund payments.

6. Books and Records. During the term of this A greement and for five (5) years after the ter mination or expiration of this Agreement, the Subrecipient shall keep appropriate books, records, and accounts in connection with the ARPA funds and activities performed under this agreement and is subject to the following:

A. The Subrecipient shall maintain all records related to this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, including the following records: (i) general ledger and subsidiary ledgers used to account for the receipt of ARPA funds and the disbursements of ARPA funds to meet eligible expenses; (ii) budget records for al l fiscal years covered by this A greement; (iii) payroll, time records, human resource records to support costs incurred for payroll expenses related to this agreement; (iv) receipts of purchases made related to this agreement; (v) contracts and subcontracts entered into using ARPA funds and all documents related to such contracts; (vi) grant subaward agreements entered into using ARPA funds and all documents related to such awards; (vii) all documentation of reports, audits, and other monitoring of contractors, subcontractors, the Subrecipient, and subrecipient; (viii) all documentation supporting the performance outcomes of contracts, subcontracts, grant subaward agreements, and this agreement; (ix) all internal and external email/electronic communications related to use of ARPA funds; and (x) all investigative files and inquiry reports involving payment of ARPA funds.

B. The Subrecipient shall make its books, records, and accounts (both those that relate to this Agreement and those that do not), employees, performance-related records, property, and equipment related to this Agreement available to the City, any independent auditor, the United States Department of the Treasury Office of Inspector General ("OIG"), and the Pandemic Relief Accountability Committee at all reasonable times so that the City, independent auditor, or OIG may determine whether the Subrecipient has complied with this A greement. If the City requests, the Subrecipient shall obtain and provide to the City, at the Subrecipient 's sole cost, an independent financial audit of the Subrecipient 's use of the ARPA funds.

C. Upon demand by the City, given in accordance with section 9, the Subrecipient shall reimburse the City for all ARPA funds that the Accounting Manager, City Auditor, an independent auditor, or the OIG determines were expended for activities other than Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPAA and the ARPA Guidance, with reimbursement to be by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9, Notice.

7. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement if the City Manager determines that:

A. The Subrecipient has failed to perform, or has performed unsatisfactorily, any term of this Agreement, including failing to use the ARPA funds solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARPA Guidance;
B. The Subrecipient has made (with or without knowledge) any material misrepresentation of any nature with respect to any information or statements furnished to City in connection with this Agreement; or
C. There is pending litigation with respect to the performance by Subrecipient of any of its duties or obligations under this Agreement that may materially jeopardize or adversely affect the undertaking of or the carrying out of the Authorized Activities.

8. Pass-through Entity and Subrecipient Requirements. The Subrecipient acknowledges that it is a pass-through entity and subrecipient as defined in title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), section 200.1. In connection with its activities and expenditures related to this agreement, the Subrecipient shall do the following:

A. The Subrecipient shall comply with all federal laws, regulations, and terms of the ARPA Guidance that apply to a pass-through entity and subrecipient of a subaward of an ARPA fund, if any, including the ARPA and the applicable provisions of the CFR, as set forth in the federal Assistance Listing No. 21.027;
B. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.332, the Subrecipient’s required subaward information is attached as Attachment “D”.

C. The Subrecipient shall maintain a valid SAM.gov registration.

D. The Subrecipient shall comply with the applicable cost principles in title 2, CFR, Part 200, Subpart E and, to the extent required, costs must be reasonable, eligible, and allocable as provided in title 2, CFR, sections 100.404 and 200.405.

E. The Subrecipient shall not seek reimbursement for pre-award costs, as defined in title 2, CFR, section 200.458.

F. The Subrecipient shall comply with all laws and regulations, including title 2, CFR, Part 200, subpart D, when purchasing equipment or property.

G. The Subrecipient shall comply with the audit requirements in title 2, CFR, Part 200, Subpart F.

H. The Subrecipient shall comply with the provisions of title 24, CFR, Part 24, relating to the employment, engagement of services, awarding of contracts, or funding of any contractors or subcontractors during any period of debarment, suspension, or placement in ineligibility status.

I. The Subrecipient shall enter into a written contract when it purchases goods or services using ARPA funds. All procurement contracts using ARPA funds shall be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in title 2, CFR, sections 200.317 through 200.327, as applicable.

J. The Subrecipient shall not grant any subaward without the express written consent of the City.

K. On a monthly basis, the Subrecipient shall provide the City with a written report on the progress made on the Authorized Activities in a form approved by the City.

L. The Subrecipient shall provide the City with a closeout report that includes all the following: (i) total number of delinquent utility accounts resolved with the ARPA funds as well as the total dollar amount; (ii) the amount of each contract for the purchase of goods or services that is paid for in whole or in part with ARPA funds, if any; (iii) a copy of each contract for the purchase of goods or services that is paid for in whole or in part with ARPA funds, if any; (iv) all information required to be reported under Attachment “A”; and (v) any other information that the City may request to demonstrate that the ARPA funds were used solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARP A Guidance. The Subrecipient shall include with the report a certification that it used the ARP A funds solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARPA Guidance. The Subrecipient shall submit the closeout report and certification no later than forty five (45) days following the final disbursement of ARP A funds under this Agreement.

9. Notices. Any notice, request, report or demand under this Agreement must be in writing and will be considered properly given and effective only when mailed or delivered in the manner provided by this section 9 to the persons identified below or their successors. A mailed notice, application, request, report, or demand will be effective or will be considered to have been given on the third calendar day after it is deposited in the United States Mail (certified mail), addressed as set forth below, with postage prepaid. A notice, application, request, report, or demand sent in any other manner will be effective or will be considered properly given when actually delivered.

Any party may charge its address for these purposes by giving written notice of the change to the other party in the manner provided in this section.

If to the City:

City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, California 92509
Attn: Kevin Ryan, Project Manager
If to the Subrecipient :

Rubidoux Community Services District
3590 Rubidoux Blvd.

Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn: Brian Laddusaw

10. Indemnity. The Subrecipient shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers and employees, and each and every one of them, from and against any and all actions, damages, costs, liabilities, claims, demands, losses, judgments, penalties, costs and expenses of every type and description, including, but not limited to, any fees and/or costs reasonably incurred by the City's staff attorneys or outside attorneys and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision (collectively, "Liabilities"), including Liabilities arising from personal injury or death, damage to personal, real or intellectual property or the environment, contractual or other

economic damages, or regulatory penalties, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement, whether or not (i) such Liabilities are caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder or (ii) such Liabilities are litigated, settled or reduced to judgment, except that the foregoing indemnity does not apply to liability for any damage or expense for death or bodily injury to persons or damage to property to the extent arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, except when such agents, servants, or independent contr actors are under the direct supervision and control of the Subrecipient . The Subrecipient ’s indemnifications and obligations under this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.

11. Conflicts of Interest. The Subrecipient , its officers, directors, employees, agents, and subcontractors shall not have or acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, that creates an actual or apparent conflict with the interests of the City or that in any way hinders the Subrecipient's performance under this agreement. The Subrecipient shall disclose, in writing to the City, any potential conflict of interest affecting the awarded funds in accordance with title 2, CFR, section 200.112 and must maintain a conflict of interest policy consistent with title 2, CFR, section 200.318, subsection (c).

12. Prohibition of Expending State or Federal Funds for Lobbying.

A. The Subrecipient certifies, to the best of its knowledge or belief, that:
1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Subrecipient, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any State or Federal agency, a Member of the State Legislature or United States Congress, an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress, or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress in connection with the awarding of any State or Federal contract, the making of any State or Federal grant, the making of any State or Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any State or Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2) If any funds other than Federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative Agreement, the Subrecipient will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.

B. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this agreement was entered into. This certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this Agreement imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification will be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

C. The Subrecipient also agrees, by signing this Agreement, that it will require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier contracts and subawards that exceed $100,000, and that all such subcontractors and subrecipient shall certify and disclose accordingly.

D. The Subrecipient certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and any disclosure. In addition, the Subrecipient understands and

agrees that the provisions of Chapter 38 of title 31 of U.S. Code, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and any disclosure.

13. Drug -free Certification. By signing this Agreement, the Subrecipient hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Subrecipient will comply with the requirements of title 31, CFR, Part 20 (Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace) and the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Cal. Gov . Code, §§ 8350, et seq.).

14. Environmental Compliance. The Subrecipient shall comply with all generally applicable federal environmental laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.), Executive Order 11738, all Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") Regulations (title 40, CFR) and all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant thereto. The Subrecipient agrees to report any violation of these statutes and regulations to the City and understands and agrees that the City will, in turn, report each violation, as required, to assure notification to the appropriate federal agency and EPA Regional Office.

15. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions. The Subrecipient shall comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655) and implementing regulations, to the extent applicable.

16. Hatch Act. Any Subrecipient that is a public agency shall comply, as applicable, with requirements of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328), which limits certain political activities of state or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by federal funds.

17. False Claims. The Subrecipient understands that making false statements or claims in connection with this award is a violation of federal law and may result in criminal, civil, or administrative sanctions, including fines, imprisonment, civil damages and penalties, debarment from participating in federal awards or contracts, and/or any other remedy available by law.

18. Labor Standards. The Subrecipient shall comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act and all other applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards insofar as those act apply to the performance of this Agreement. The Subrecipient shall maintain documentation which demonstrates compliance with hour and wages requirements of this part. Such documentation shall be made available to the City for review upon request.

19. Publications. Any publications produced with funds from this award must display the following language: "This project [is being] [was] supported, in whole or in part, by federal award number [enter project FAIN] awarded to [name of Recipient] by the U.S. Department of the Treasury."

20. Protections For Whistleblowers. In accordance with section 4712 of title 41 of the U.S.

Code, the Subrecipient may not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against any employee in reprisal for disclosing an information the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of this Agreement, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority related to this Agreement, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to this agreement. Subrecipient shall inform its employees, in

writing, of the rights and remedies provided to them under this section in the predominant native language of the workforce.

21. Licensure. The Subrecipient certifies that it shall hold all applicable licenses and/or certifications required by Subrecipient’s profession and maintain them throughout the term of this Agreement, and that the Subrecipient’s performance shall meet the standards of licensure/certification.

22. Independent Contractor. The Subrecipient understands that it is an independent contractor, not an employee of the City, and is not eligible for any employee benefits, including but not limited to unemployment, health/dental insurance, worker’s compensation, vacation or sick leave.

23. Prevailing Wage. If any of the activities listed in Attachment “A” are subject to the prevailing wage requirements under section 1720 et seq. of the California Labor Code, then the Subrecipient shall require its contractor and subcontractors to adhere to those requirements, including the following: contracts between the contractor and subcontractors must include provisions requiring the payment of prevailing wage; the contractor shall monitor subcontractors' payment of prevailing wage by periodically reviewing certified payroll records and diligently taking corrective action if the subcontractors fail to pay prevailing wage; contractor and subcontractors shall maintain certified payroll records and time records.

The contractor to whom a contract is awarded, and any subcontractor under such contractor, shall not pay less th an the specified prevailing wage; contractor and subcontractors are subject to penalties for violations of prevailing wage provisions. The Subrecipient shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City from all additional wages, benefits, fees, damages, penalties, fines, legal fees, court costs, arbitration costs, and other costs arising from the Subrecipient 's or its contractor's improper application of California's prevailing wage laws to the activities listed in Attachment “A”. If all applicable labor compliance requirements are not met, then upon demand by the City, given in accordance with section 9, the Subrecipient shall reimburse the City for all ARPA funds spent on construction or related services, in whole or in part, with reimbursement to be by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9.

24. Miscellaneous.

A. Assignment. The Subrecipient may not assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any interest in it without the City's written consent, which the City may grant or deny in its sole discretion. An assignment or other transfer made contrary to this section is void.

B. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement binds and inures to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties. This section does not constitute the City's consent to any assignment of this agreement or any interest in this Agreement.

C. Interpretation. This agreement is to be interpreted and applied in accordance with California law.

D. Attachments. Attachments “A”, “B”, “C”, and “D” are attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

E. Waiver of Breach. A party's failure to insist on strict performance of this agreement or to exercise any right or remedy upon the other party's breach of this Agreement will not constitute a wa iver of the performance, right, or remedy. A party's waiver of the other party's breach of any term or provision in this Agreement is not a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term or provision. A waiver is bindi ng only if set forth in writing and signed by the waiving party.

F. Severability. If a court with jurisdiction rules that any nonmaterial part of this Agreement is invalid, unenforceable, or contrary to law or public policy, then the rest of this Agreement remains valid and fully enforceable.

G. Counterparts. The parties may sign this Agreement in counterparts, each of which is considered an original, but all of which constitute the same Agreement. Facsimiles, pdfs, and photocopies of signature pages of the Agreement have the same binding effect as originals.

H. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in performing this Agreement.

I. Compliance with all Laws, Requirements, and Orders. The Subrecipient shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, orders of public officials, and requirements in connection with this Agreement, including all non-discrimination and equal opportunity laws to ensure that Subrecipient does not deny benefits or services or otherwise discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), disability, age, or sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352, title 42 of the U.S. Code, sections 2000d et seq., and the Department's implementing regulations, title 31, CFR, part 22; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), Public Law 93-112, as amended by Public Law 93-516, title 29 of the U.S. Code, section 794; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), title 20 of the U.S. Code, sections 1681 et seq., and the Department's implementing regulations, title 31, CFR, part 28; Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Public Law 94-135, title 42 of the U.S. Code, sections 6101 et seq., and the Department implementing regulations at title 31, CFR, part 23 and title 28, CFR, part 42. As a condition of receiving ARPA funds, the Subrecipient further provides the assurances set forth in Attachment “C” to this Agreement.

J. Authority to Sign. The persons signing this Agreement on Subrecipient's behalf represents that he or she is authorized to do so and that no further action beyond his or her signature is required to bind Subrecipient to this Agreement. City shall have no obligations whatsoever under this Agreement, unless and until this Agreement is executed by the City Manager or the City Manager's authorized designee.

K. Tax Implications and Consequences. The City makes no representations as to the tax consequences associated with the disbursement of ARPA funds related to this agreement, and any determination related to this issue is the sole responsibility of the Subrecipient. Subrecipient acknowledges consulting with its own tax advisors or tax attorneys regarding this transaction or having had an opportunity to do so prior to signing this Agreement. Subrecipient acknowledges the City cannot provide advice regarding the tax consequences or implications of the ARPA funds disbursed to Subrecipient under the terms of this Agreement.

L. Integration and Modification. This Agreement sets forth the parties’ entire understanding regarding the matters addressed above and is intended to be their final, complete, and exclusive expression of those matters. It supersedes all prior or contemporaneous Agreements,

representations, and negotiations ̶ written, oral, expressed, or implied ̶ and may be modified only by another written Agreement signed by both parties.

[signature page follows]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, A Municipal
Corporation of the State of California

Rod B. Butler
City Manager

ATTEST:

_____________________________’
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney

RUBIDOUX COMMUNITY SERVICES

DISTRICT

General Manager

ATTEST:

_____________________________’

District Secretary

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

General Counsel

ATTACHMENT “A”

APPROVED ACTIVITIES

• RCSD acting as a Subrecipient of ARPA funds awarded to the City of Jurupa Valley will distribute a rebate to their customers.
• As of the drafting of this agreement RCSD had a total of 5,969 customers . • RCSD will provide a rebate to each customer in the amount of $ 35.00 For a total dollar amount of $ 208,915

Administrative Expenses

• No Administrative costs are anticipated
• The amount of ARPA funds to be processed by RCSD for Utility Rate Payback Program Administration shall not exceed providing two-hundred eight thousand, nine hundred fifteen dollars ($208,915).

ATTACHMENT “B”

APPROVED BUDGET

Utility Account Credits:
• The amount of ARPA funds to be processed by RCSD for Utility Rate Payback Program Administration shall not exceed providing two hundred-eight thousand, nine hundred fifteen dollars ($208,915).

Administrative Expenses :

• No Administrative costs are anticipated .

ATTACHMENT “C”

ASSURANCES OF COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS

As a condition of receipt of federal financial assistance from the Department of the Treasury, the Subrecipient provides the assurances stated in this Attachment “C”. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 provides that the provisions of the assurances apply to all of the operations of the Subrecipient's programs funded under this Agreement.

1. Subrecipient ensures its current and future compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, which prohibits exclusion from participation, denial of the benefits of, or subjection to discrimination under programs and activities receiving federal f inancial assistance, of any person in the United States on the ground of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury Title VI regulations at title 31, CFR, Part 22 and other pertinent execut ive orders such as Executive Order 13166, directives, circulars, policies, memoranda, and/or guidance documents.

2. The Subrecipient shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of Secretary of Labor, as applicable. The Subrecipient will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and wil l permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the City and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders. The Subrecipient shall include the provisions of this section in every sub-agreement or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each sub-agreement or vendor.

3. During the performance of this agreement, the Subrecipient shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, creed, sex, color, or national origin. The Subrecipient will, in all solicitation of advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Subrecipient , state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to age, race, creed, color, sex, or national origin. The Subrecipient shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their age, race, creed, sex, color, or national origin. Such action shall include, without limitation, the f ollowing: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; rates of pay of other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Subrecipient agrees to post in conspicuous places,

available to employees and applicants for empl oyment, notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.

4. Subrecipient acknowledges that Executive Order 13166, "Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency," seeks to improve access to federally assisted programs and activities for individuals who, because of national origin, have Limited English proficiency (LEP). The Subrecipient understands that denying a person access to its programs, services, and activities because of LEP is a form of national origin discrimination prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Department of the Treasury's implementing regulations. Accordingly, the Subrecipient shall initiate reasonable steps, or comply with the Department of the Treasury's directives, to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to its programs, services, and activities. Subrecipient understands and agrees that meaningful access may entail providing language assistance services, including oral interpretation and written trans lation where necessary, to ensure effective communication in the Subrecipient 's programs, services, and activities.

5. Subrecipient agrees to consider the need for language services for LEP persons when Subrecipient develops applicable budgets and conducts programs, services, and activities. As a resource, the Department of the Treasury has published its LEP guidance at 70 FR 6067. For more information on taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful access for LEP persons, please visit http://www.lep.gov
.

6. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that compliance with the assurances constitutes a condition of continued receipt of federal financial assistance and is binding upon Subrecipient and Subrecipient's successors, transferees, and assignees for the term of this agreement.

7. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that it must require any sub-Subrecipient s, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees to comply with assurances 1 -6 above, and agrees to incorporate the following language in every contract or agreement subject to Title VI and its regulations between the Subrecipient and the Subrecipient's sub-Subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees :

The sub-Subrecipient, contractor, subcontractor, successor, transferee, and assignee shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from excluding from a program or activity, denying benefits of, or otherwise discriminating against a person on the basis of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract (or agreement). Title VI also includes protection to persons with "Limited English Proficiency" in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, and herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract or agreement.

8. Subrecipient understands and agrees that if any real property or structure is provided or improved with the aid of federal financial assistance by the Department of the Treasury, this assurance obligates the Subrecipient , or in the case of a subsequent transfer, the t ransferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the

federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is p rovided, this assurance obligates the Subrecipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. Subrecipient shall cooperate in any enforcement or compliance review activities by the Department of the Treasury. Enforcement may include investigation, arbitration, mediation, litigation, and monitoring of any settlement agreements that may result from these actions. The Subrecipient shall comply with information requests, on -site compliance reviews and reporting requirements.

10. Subrecipient shall maintain a complaint log and inform the City of any complaints of discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, and limited English proficiency covered by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and implementing regulations and provide, upon request, a list of all such reviews or proceedings based on the complaint, pending or completed, including outcome. Subrecipient also must inform the City if Subrecipient has received no complaints under Title VI.

11. In its monthly reporting, Subrecipient must provide documentation of any determination by an administrative agency or court finding non-compliance with Title VI and Subrecipient's efforts to address the non-compliance, including any voluntary compliance or other agreements between the Subrecipient and the administrative agency that made the finding. If the Subrecipient settles a case or matter alleging such discrimination, the Subrecipient must provide documentation of the settlement to the City. In the absence of such disclosures, Subrecipient is certifying that it has not been the subject of any court or administrative agency finding of discrimination.

12. If the Subrecipient makes sub-awards to other agencies or other entities, the Subrecipient is responsible for ensuring that sub-Subrecipients also comply with Title VI and other applicable authorities covered in this agreement. State agencies that make sub-awards must have in place standard grant assurances and review procedures to demonstrate that that they are effectively monitoring the civil rights compliance of sub-Subrecipients.

13. The United States of America has the right to seek judicial enforcement of the terms of this Attachment “C”, and nothing in this Agreement alters or limits the federal enforcement measures that the United States may take in order to address violations of this agreement or applicable federal law.

-18-
12774-0001\2869167v2.doc
ATTACHMENT “D”

SUBRECIPIENT (SUBRECIPIENT) SUBAWARD INFORMATION

1 Subrecipient Name (which must match registered name
in DUNS):

2 Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier:

3 TIN (Tax Identification No)

4 Legal Business Name

5 Address of Business
6 Point of Contact Email

7 Is your business/agency registered in SAM.gov
8 In the prior fiscal year did your company receive 80% or more of its annual gross revenue from Federal
Funds?

9 In the prior fiscal year did your company receive $25 Million or more of its annual gross revenue from
federal funds?

10 If YES to 8 or 9 above. Is the total compensation for the organizations five highest paid officers publicly
listed or otherwise listed in SAM.gov?

11 If YES to 8 or 9 and NO to 10 please list your 5 highest paid officers, if less than 5 please disregard.

a.
b.
c.
d.
e

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT UTILITY BILL ASSISTA NCE GRANT

AGREEMENT
This AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of February 15, 2024, between the CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a California municipal corporation (the "City"), and Jurupa Community Services District, a community services district organized and operating pursuant to California Government Code Sections 61000 et seq. (the "Subrecipient "). In consideration of the purposes and terms of this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

1. Recitals. The Parties agree that this Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:

A. On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”). ARPA established the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, which together make up the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”) program. ARPA provides for $130.2 billion in funding for local governments to provide area-specific assistance to respond to and mitigate the negative effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on their communities. The City received approximately $28,077,013.00 in ARPA funding.

B. Based on the availability of ARPA-allocated funds, the City has decided to provide funding to the Subrecipient to further the purposes of the ARPA, as provided in this Agreement.

C. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote public health and address the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing five hundred-twenty nine thousand, two hundred dollars ($529,200) in ARPA funds to the Subrecipient for utility account credits for Jurupa Valley residents within the Subrecipient’s service area.

D. Subrecipient provides water and sewer services for people within a portion of the City of Jurupa Valley.

E. During the COVID-19 Pandemic many customers of Subrecipient and other people in the City of Jurupa Valley were unable to pay all or portions of their water and sewer bills or were otherwise adversely affected economically through loss of jobs, inability to work, need to care for ill family members, their own illness resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

F. This Agreement will provide a means by which the City and Subrecipient can provide some financial assistance to those people in Jurupa Valley adversely affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic and customers of the Subrecipient.

2. Term. This Agreement shall become effective on February 15, 2024, (the “Effective Date”] and shall terminate on December 31, 2026, subject to early termination under section 7 (“Term of Agreement”).

3. Grant of ARPA Funds. The City shall disburse to the Subrecipient a total sum not to exceed providing five hundred-twenty nine thousand, two hundred dollars ($529,200) in accordance with section 4 of this Agreement. The funds disbursed by the City under this Agreement are referred to as “ARPA funds.” In no instance will the City be liable for any

payments or costs in excess of this amount, for any unauthorized or ineligible costs, or for costs incurred after the termination date described in Section 2.

4. Disbursement of ARPA Funds. The City will make payments to the Subrecipient of the ARP Funds as follows:

A. Subrecipient shall file a written request with the City for disbursal of all or part of the ARPA Funds for Utility Account Credits which shall include a declaration that Subrecipient is ready to use the ARPA Funds for the Authorized activities. City shall disburse the ARPA Funds to Subrecipient for Utility Account Credits within fifteen (15) calendar days following this written request.
1) On a monthly basis, the Subrecipient shall provide the City with a written report on the progress made on the Authorized Activities in accordance with section 8(l) of this Agreement.
2) The City will notify the Subrecipient within fifteen (15) calendar days following receipt of its request and written report of any circumstances or data identified by the City that would cause withholding of approval and subsequent payment.

B. On a monthly basis, Subrecipient shall provide to City a detailed and properly documented invoice for reimbursement of allowable expenses in administering this Agreement as provided in Attachments A, Authorized Activities, and Attachment B, Approved Budget . The invoice shall include a detailed accounting of costs already incurred in sufficient detail for the City, in its opinion, to substantiate the costs.

5. Authorized Uses. The following terms apply to the Subrecipient's activities and expenditures related to this Agreement:

A. The Subrecipient may seek reimbursement solely for costs it incurs that are necessary to carry out the activities listed in Attachment ”A” (“Authorized Activities”) in accordance with the budget listed in Attachment “B” (“Approved Budget”). If a term included in Attachment “A” is stated as an obligation, then the Subrecipient is obligated to perform the term under this agreement.

B. The Subrecipient may seek reimbursement solely for eligible costs that it incurs between the Effective Date of this Agreement and December 31, 2026. If Subrecipient receives a refund or credit for any cost for which it received a payment of ARPA funds, Subrecipient shall return ARPA funds in an amount equal to the refund or credit to the City by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9 no later than ten (10) calendar days following receipt of such refund or credit, unless otherwise agreed to, in writing, by the City.

C. When incurring costs for which it will seek reimbursement under this Agreement, the Subrecipient is subject to the restrictions set forth in the ARPA, as well as the Department of the Treasury's Final Rule, FAQs, Fact Sheet, and Compliance and Reporting Guidance (collectively the “ARPA Guidance”), as the Guidance may be amended from time to time. The ARPA Guidance can be found at
https://home.treasury.gov/policy -
issues/coronavirus/assistance -for- state -local -and -tribal- governments/state -and -local - fiscal -recovery -funds .

D. Any costs that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable are subject to repayment by the Subrecipient to the City within sixty (60) calendar days unless the City approves in writing an alternative repayment plan.

E. The Subrecipient shall not use the ARPA funds to supplant funding provided by the City to the Subrecipient under any other agreement. The Subrecipient shall include a term in every grant subaward agreement and contract that prohibits the subrecipient or contractor from using ARPA funds to supplant funding provided by the City directly or indirectly to the subrecipient or contractor.

F. If the Subrecipient has received other ARPAA funds from the City or any other entity, or has received other federal funds (e.g., Coronavirus Relief Act funds, payroll protection act loan, etc.), Subrecipient shall not use the ARPA funds awarded pursuant to this agreement to pay for direct or indirect costs already covered by the other federal funds or ARPA fund payments.

6. Books and Records. During the term of this A greement and for five (5) years after the ter mination or expiration of this Agreement, the Subrecipient shall keep appropriate books, records, and accounts in connection with the ARPA funds and activities performed under this agreement and is subject to the following:

A. The Subrecipient shall maintain all records related to this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, including the following records: (i) general ledger and subsidiary ledgers used to account for the receipt of ARPA funds and the disbursements of ARPA funds to meet eligib le expenses; (ii) budget records for al l fiscal years covered by this A greement; (iii) payroll, time records, human resource records to support costs incurred for payroll expenses related to this agreement; (iv) receipts of purchases made related to this agreement; (v) contracts and subcontracts entered into using ARPA funds and all documents related to such contracts; (vi) grant subaward agreements entered into using ARPA funds and all documents related to such awards; (vii) all documentation of reports, a udits, and other monitoring of contractors, subcontractors, the Subrecipient, and subrecipient; (viii) all documentation supporting the performance outcomes of contracts, subcontracts, grant subaward agreements, and this agreement; (ix) all internal and external email/electronic communications related to use of ARPA funds; and (x) all investigative files and inquiry reports involving payment of ARPA funds.

B. The Subrecipient shall make its books, records, and accounts (both those that relate to this agreement and those that do not), employees, performance-related records, property, and equipment related to this agreement available to the City, any independent auditor, the United States Department of the Treasury Office of Inspector General ("OIG"), and the Pandemic Relief Accountability Committee at all reasonable times so that the City, independent auditor, or OIG may determine whether the Subrecipient has complied with this agreement. If the City reques ts, the Subrecipient shall obtain and provide to the City, at the Subrecipient 's sole cost, an independent financial audit of the Subrecipient 's use of the ARPA funds.

C. Upon demand by the City, given in accordance with section 9, the Subrecipient shall reimburse the City for all ARPA funds that the Accounting Manager, City Auditor, an independent auditor, or the OIG determines were expended for activities other than Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPAA and the ARPA Guidance, with reimbursement to be by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9, Notice.

7. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement if the City Manager determines that:

A. The Subrecipient has failed to perform, or has performed unsatisfactorily, any term of this agreement, including failing to use the ARPA funds solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARPA Guidance;
B. The Subrecipient has made (with or without knowledge) any material misrepresentation of any nature with respect to any information or statements furnished to City in connection with this agreement; or
C. There is pending litigation with respect to the performance by Subrecipient of any of its duties or obligations under this Agreement that may materially jeopardize or adversely affect the undertaking of or the carrying out of the Authorized Activities.

8. Pass-through Entity and Subrecipient Requirements. The Subrecipient acknowledges that it is a pass-through entity and subrecipient as defined in title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), section 200.1. In connection with its activities and expenditures related to this agreement, the Subrecipient shall do the following:

A. The Subrecipient shall comply with all federal laws, regulations, and terms of the ARPA Guidance that apply to a pass-through entity and subrecipient of a subaward of an ARPA fund, if any, including the ARPA and the applicable provisions of the CFR, as set forth in the federal Assistance Listing No. 21.027;
B. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.332, the Subrecipient’s required subaward information is attached as Attachment “D”.

C. The Subrecipient shall maintain a valid SAM.gov registration.

D. The Subrecipient shall comply with the applicable cost principles in title 2, CFR, Part 200, Subpart E and, to the extent required, costs must be reasonable, eligible, and allocable as provided in title 2, CFR, sections 100.404 and 200.405.

E. The Subrecipient shall not seek reimbursement for pre-award costs, as defined in title 2, CFR, section 200.458.

F. The Subrecipient shall comply with all laws and regulations, including title 2, CFR, Part 200, subpart D, when purchasing equipment or property.

G. The Subrecipient shall comply with the audit requirements in title 2, CFR, Part 200, Subpart F.

H. The Subrecipient shall comply with the provisions of title 24, CFR, Part 24, relating to the employment, engagement of services, awarding of contracts, or funding of any contractors or subcontractors during any period of debarment, suspension, or placement in ineligibility status.

I. The Subrecipient shall enter into a written contract when it purchases goods or services using ARPA funds. All procurement contracts using ARPA funds shall be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in title 2, CFR, sections 200.317 through 200.327, as applicable.

J. The Subrecipient shall not grant any subaward without the express written consent of the City.

K. On a monthly basis, the Subrecipient shall provide the City with a written report on the progress made on the Authorized Activities in a form approved by the City.

L. The Subrecipient shall provide the City with a closeout report that includes all the following: (i) total number of delinquent utility accounts resolved with the ARPA funds as well as the total dollar amount; (ii) the amount of each contract for the purchase of goods or services that is paid for in whole or in part with ARPA funds, if any; (iii) a copy of each contract for the purchase of goods or services that is paid for in whole or in part with ARPA funds, if any; (iv) all information required to be reported under Attachment “A”; and (v) any other information that the City may request to demonstrate that the ARPA funds were used solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARP A Guidance. The Subre cipient shall include with the report a certification that it used the ARP A funds solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARPA Guidance. The Subrecipient shall submit the closeout report and certification no later than forty fi ve ( 45) days following the final disbursement of ARP A funds under this Agreement.

9. Notices. Any notice, request, report or demand under this agreement must be in writing and will be considered properly given and effective only when mailed or delivered in the manner provided by this section 9 to the persons identified below or their successors. A mailed notice, application, request, report, or demand will be effective or will be considered to have been given on the third calendar day after it is deposited in the United States Mail (certified mail), addressed as set forth below, with postage prepaid. A notice, application, request, report, or demand sent in any other manner will be effective or will be considered properly given when actually delivered.

Any party may charge its address for these purposes by giving written notice of the change to the other party in the manner provided in this section.

If to the City:

City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, California 92509
Attn: Kevin Ryan, Project Manager
If to the Subrecipient :

Jurupa Community Services District
11201 Harrel Street
Jurupa Valley, CA 91752
Attn: Chris Berch, General Manager

10. Indemnity. The Subrecipient shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers and employees, and each and every one of them, from and against any and all actions, damages, costs, liabilities, claims, demands, losses, judgments, penalties, costs and expenses of every type and description, including, but not limited to, any fees and/or costs reasonably incurred by the City's staff attorneys or outside attorneys and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision (collectively, "Liabilities"), including Liabilities arising from personal injury or death, damage to personal, real or intellectual property or the environment, contractual or other

economic damages, or regulatory penalties, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement, whether or not (i) such Liabilities are caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder or (ii) such Liabilities are litigated, settled or reduced to judgment, except that the foregoing indemnity does not apply to liability for any damage or expense for death or bodily injury to persons or damage to property to the extent arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, except when such agents, servants, or independent contr actors are under the direct supervision and control of the Subrecipient . The Subrecipient ’s indemnifications and obligations under this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.

11. Conflicts of Interest. The Subrecipient , its officers, directors, employees, agents, and subcontractors shall not have or acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, that creates an actual or apparent conflict with the interests of the City or that in any way hinders the Subrecipient's performance under this agreement. The Subrecipient shall disclose, in writing to the City, any potential conflict of interest affecting the awarded funds in accordance with title 2, CFR, section 200.112 and must maintain a conflict of interest policy consistent with title 2, CFR, section 200.318, subsection (c).

12. Prohibition of Expending State or Federal Funds for Lobbying.

A. The Subrecipient certifies, to the best of its knowledge or belief, that:
1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Subrecipient, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any State or Federal agency, a Member of the State Legislature or United States Congress, an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress, or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress in connection with the awarding of any State or Federal contract, the making of any State or Federal grant, the making of any State or Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any State or Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2) If any funds other than Federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative Agreement, the Subrecipient will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.

B. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this agreement was entered into. This certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this Agreement imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification will be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

C. The Subrecipient also agrees, by signing this Agreement, that it will require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier contracts and subawards that exceed $100,000, and that all such subcontractors and subrecipient shall certify and disclose accordingly.

D. The Subrecipient certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and any disclosure. In addition, the Subrecipient understands and

agrees that the provisions of Chapter 38 of title 31 of U.S. Code, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and any disclosure.

13. Drug -free Certification. By signing this Agreement, the Subrecipient hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Subrecipient will comply with the requirements of title 31, CFR, Part 20 (Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace) and the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Cal. Gov . Code, §§ 8350, et seq.).

14. Environmental Compliance. The Subrecipient shall comply with all generally applicable federal environmental laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.), Executive Order 11738, all Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") Regulations (title 40, CFR) and all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant thereto. The Subrecipient agrees to report any violation of these statutes and regulations to the City and understands and agrees that the City will, in turn, report each violation, as required, to assure notification to the appropriate federal agency and EPA Regional Office.

15. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions. The Subrecipient shall comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655) and implementing regulations, to the extent applicable.

16. Hatch Act. Any Subrecipient that is a public agency shall comply, as applicable, with requirements of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328), which limits certain political activities of state or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by federal funds.

17. False Claims. The Subrecipient understands that making false statements or claims in connection with this award is a violation of federal law and may result in criminal, civil, or administrative sanctions, including fines, imprisonment, civil damages and penalties, debarment from participating in federal awards or contracts, and/or any other remedy available by law.

18. Labor Standards. The Subrecipient shall comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act and all other applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards insofar as those act apply to the performance of this Agreement. The Subrecipient shall maintain documentation which demonstrates compliance with hour and wages requirements of this part. Such documentation shall be made available to the City for review upon request.

19. Publications. Any publications produced with funds from this award must display the following language: "This project [is being] [was] supported, in whole or in part, by federal award number [enter project FAIN] awarded to [name of Recipient] by the U.S. Department of the Treasury."

20. Protections For Whistleblowers. In accordance with section 4712 of title 41 of the U.S.

Code, the Subrecipient may not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against any employee in reprisal for disclosing an information the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of this agreement, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority related to this agreement, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to this agreement. Subrecipient shall inform its employees, in

writing, of the rights and remedies provided to them under this section in the predominant native language of the workforce.

21. Licensure. The Subrecipient certifies that it shall hold all applicable licenses and/or certifications required by Subrecipient’s profession and maintain them throughout the term of this agreement, and that the Subrecipient’s performance shall meet the standards of licensure/certification.

22. Independent Contractor. The Subrecipient understands that it is an independent contractor, not an employee of the City, and is not eligible for any employee benefits, including but not limited to unemployment, health/dental insurance, worker’s compensation, vacation or sick leave.

23. Prevailing Wage. If any of the activities listed in Attachment “A” are subject to the prevailing wage requirements under section 1720 et seq. of the California Labor Code, then the Subrecipient shall require its contractor and subcontractors to adhere to those requirements, including the following: contracts between the contractor and subcontractors must include provisions requiring the payment of prevailing wage; the contractor shall monitor subcontractors' payment of prevailing wage by periodically reviewing certified payroll r ecords and diligently taking corrective action if the subcontractors fail to pay prevailing wage; contractor and subcontractors shall maintain certified payroll records and time records.

The contractor to whom a contract is awarded, and any subcontractor u nder such contractor, shall not pay less than the specified prevailing wage; contractor and subcontractors are subject to penalties for violations of prevailing wage provisions. The Subrecipient shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City from all additional wages, benefits, fees, damages, penalties, fines, legal fees, court costs, arbitration costs, and other costs arising from the Subrecipient 's or its contractor's improper application of California's prevailing wage laws to the activities listed in Attachment “A”. If all applicable labor compliance requirements are not met, then upon demand by the City, given in accordance with section 9, the Subrecipient shall reimburse the City for all ARPA funds spent on construction or related services, in whole or in part, with reimbursement to be by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9.

24. Miscellaneous.

A. Assignment. The Subrecipient may not assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any interest in it without the City's written consent, which the City may grant or deny in its sole discretion. An assignment or other transfer made contrary to this section is void.

B. Successors and Assigns. This agreement binds and inures to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties. This section does not constitute the City's consent to any assignment of this agreement or any interest in this agreement.

C. Interpretation. This agreement is to be interpreted and applied in accordance with California law.

D. Attachments. Attachments “A”, “B”, “C”, and “D” are attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

E. Waiver of Breach. A party's failure to insist on strict performance of this agreement or to exercise any right or remedy upon the other party's breach of this agreement will not constitute a waiver of the performance, right, or remedy. A party's waiver of the other party's breach of any term or provision in this agreement is not a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term or provision. A waiver is binding only if set forth in writing and signed by the waiving party.

F. Severability. If a court with jurisdiction rules that any nonmaterial part of this agreement is invalid, unenforceable, or contrary to law or public policy, then the rest of this agreement remains valid and fully enforceable.

G. Counterparts. The parties may sign this agreement in counterparts, each of which is considered an original, but all of which constitute the same agreement. Facsimiles, pdfs, and photocopies of signature pages of the agreement have the same binding effect as originals.

H. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in performing this Agreement.

I. Compliance with all Laws, Requirements, and Orders. The Subrecipient shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, orders of public officials, and requirements in connection with this Agreement, including all non-discrimination and equal opportunity laws to ensure that Subrecipient does not deny benefits or services or otherwise discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), disability, age, or sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352, title 42 of the U.S. Code, sections 2000d et seq., and the Department's implementing regulations, title 31, CFR, part 22; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), Public Law 93-112, as amended by Public Law 93-516, title 29 of the U.S. Code, section 794; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), title 20 of the U.S. Code, sections 1681 et seq., and the Department's implementing regulations, title 31, CFR, part 28; Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Public Law 94-135, title 42 of the U.S. Code, sections 6101 et seq., and the Department implementing regulations at title 31, CFR, part 23 and title 28, CFR, part 42. As a condition of receiving ARPA funds, the Subrecipient further provides the assurances set forth in Attachment “C” to this agreement.

J. Authority to Sign. The persons signing this Agreement on Subrecipient's behalf represents that he or she is authorized to do so and that no further action beyond his or her signature is required to bind Subrecipient to this Agreement. City shall have no obligations whatsoever under this Agreement, unless and until this Agreement is executed by the City Manager or the City Manager's authorized designee.

K. Tax Implications and Consequences. The City makes no representations as to the tax consequences associated with the disbursement of ARPA funds related to this agreement, and any determination related to this issue is the sole responsibility of the Subrecipient. Subrecipient acknowledges consulting with its own tax advisors or tax attorneys regarding this transaction or having had an opportunity to do so prior to signing this agreement. Subrecipient acknowledges the City cannot provide advice regarding the tax consequences or implications of the ARPA funds disbursed to Subrecipient under the terms of this agreement.

L. Integration and Modification. This agreement sets forth the parties’ entire understanding regarding the matters addressed above and is intended to be their final, complete, and exclusive expression of those matters. It supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements,

representations, and negotiations ̶ written, oral, expressed, or implied ̶ and may be modified only by another written agreement signed by both parties.

[signature page follows]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement in duplicate on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, A Municipal
Corporation of the State of California

Rod B. Butler
City Manager

ATTEST:

_____________________________’
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney

JURUPA COMMUNITY SERVICES

DISTRICT

General Manager

ATTEST:

_____________________________’

District Secretary

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

General Counsel

ATTACHMENT “A”

APPROVED ACTIVITIES

• JCSD acting as a Subrecipient of ARPA funds awarded to the City of Jurupa Valley will distribute a rebate to their customers.
• As of the drafting of this agreement J CSD had a total of 15,120 customers . • JCSD will provide a rebate to each customer in the amount of $ 35.00 for a total dollar amount of $ 529,200

Administrative Expenses

• No Administrative costs are anticipated.
• The amount of ARPA funds to be processed by JCSD for Utility Rate Payback Program Administration shall not exceed providing five hundred-twenty nine thousand, two hundred dollars ($529,200).

ATTACHMENT “B”

APPROVED BUDGET

Utility Account Credits:
• The amount of ARPA funds to be processed by JCSD for Utility Rate Payback Program Administration shall not exceed providing five hundred-twenty nine thousand, two hundred dollars ($529,200).

Administrative Expenses :

• No Administrative costs are anticipated .

ATTACHMENT “C”

ASSURANCES OF COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS

As a condition of receipt of federal financial assistance from the Department of the Treasury, the Subrecipient provides the assurances stated in this Attachment “C”. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 provides that the provisions of the assurances apply to all of the operations of the Subrecipient's programs funded under this Agreement.

1. Subrecipient ensures its current and future compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, which prohibits exclusion from participation, denial of the benefits of, or subjection to discrimination under programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance, of any person in the United States on the ground of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury Title VI regulations at title 31, CFR, Part 22 and other pertinent executive orde rs such as Executive Order 13166, directives, circulars, policies, memoranda, and/or guidance documents.

2. The Subrecipient shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of Secretary of Labor, as applicable. The Subrecipient will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the City and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascert ain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders. The Subrecipient shall include the provisions of this section in every sub- agreement or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Sec tion 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each sub-agreement or vendor.

3. During the performance of this agreement, the Subrecipient shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, creed, sex, color, or national origin. The Subrecipient will, in all solicitation of advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Subrecipient , state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to age, race, creed, color, sex, or national origin. The Subrecipient shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their age, race, creed, sex, color, or national origin. Such action shall include, without limitation, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; rates of pay of other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Subrecipient agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.

4. Subrecipient acknowledges that Executive Order 13166, "Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency," seeks to improve access to federally assisted programs and activities for individuals who, because of national origin, have Limited English proficiency (LEP). The Subrecipient understands that denying a person acc ess to its programs, services, and activities because of LEP is a form of national origin discrimination prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Department of the Treasury's implementing regulations. Accordingly, the Subrecipient shall initiate reasonable

steps, or comply with the Department of the Treasury's directives, to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to its programs, services, and activities. Subrecipient understands and agrees that meaningful access may entail providing language assistance services, including oral interpretation and written translation where necessary, to ensure effective communication in the Subrecipient 's programs, services, and activities.

5. Subrecipient agrees to consider the need for language services for LEP persons when Subrecipient develops applicable budgets and conducts programs, services, and activities. As a resource, the Department of the Treasury has published its LEP guidance at 70 FR 6067. For more information on taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful access for LEP persons, please visit http://www.lep.gov
.

6. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that compliance with the assurances constitutes a condition of continued receipt of federal financial assistance and is binding upon Subrecipient and Subrecipient's successors, transferees, and assignees for the term of this agreement.

7. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that it must require any sub-Subrecipient s, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees to comply with assurances 1 -6 above, and agrees to incorporate the following language in every contra ct or agreement subject to Title VI and its regulations between the Subrecipient and the Subrecipient's sub-Subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees:

The sub-Subrecipient, contractor, subcontractor, successor, transferee, and assignee shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from excluding from a program or activity, denying benefits of, or otherwise discriminating against a person on the basis of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract (or agreement). Title VI also includes protection to persons with "Limited English Proficiency" in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, and herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract or agreement.

8. Subrecipient understands and agrees that if any real property or structure is provided or improved with the aid of federal financial assistance by the Department of the Treasury, this assurance obligates the Subrecipient , or in the case of a subsequent transfer, the t ransferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is p rovided, this assurance obligates the Subrecipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. Subrecipient shall cooperate in any enforcement or compliance review activities by the Department of the Treasury. Enforcement may include investigation, arbitration, mediation, litigation, and monitoring of any settlement agreements that may result from these actions. The Subrecipient shall comply with information requests, on -site compliance reviews and reporting requirements .

10. Subrecipient shall maintain a complaint log and inform the City of any complaints of discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, and limited English proficiency covered by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and implementing regulations and provide, upon request, a list of all such reviews or proceedings based on the complaint, pending or completed, including outcome. Subrecipient also must inform the City if Subrecipient has received no complaints under Title VI.

11. In its month ly reporting, Subrecipient must provide documentation of any determination by an administrative agency or court finding non-compliance with Title VI and Subrecipient's efforts to address the non-compliance, including any voluntary compliance or other agreements between the Subrecipient and the administrative agency that made the finding. If the Subrecipient settles a case or matter alleging such discrimination, the Subrecipient must provide documentation of the settlement to the City. In the absence of such disclosures, Subrecipient is certifying that it has not been the subject of any court or administrative agency finding of discrimination.

12. If the Subrecipient makes sub-awards to other agencies or other entities, the Subrecipient is responsible for ensuring that sub-Subrecipients also comply with Title VI and other applicable authorities covered in this agreement. State agencies that make sub-awards must have in place standard grant assurances and review procedures to demonstrate that that they are effectively monitoring the civil rights compliance of sub-Subrecipients.

13. The United States of America has the right to seek judicial enforcement of the terms of this Attachment “C”, and nothing in this Agreement alters or limits the federal enforcement measures that the United States may take in order to address violations of this agreement or applicable federal law.

-18-
Error! Unknown document property name.

ATTACHMENT “D”

SUBRECIPIENT (SUBRECIPIENT) SUBAWARD INFORMATION

1 Subrecipient Name (which must match registered name
in DUNS):

2 Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier:

3 TIN (Tax Identification No)

4 Legal Business Name

5 Address of Business
6 Point of Contact Email

7 Is your business/agency registered in SAM.gov
8 In the prior fiscal year did your company receive 80% or more of its annual gross revenue from Federal
Funds?

9 In the prior fiscal year did your company receive $25 Million or more of its annual gross revenue from
federal funds?

10 If YES to 8 or 9 above. Is the total compensation for the organizations five highest paid officers publicly
listed or otherwise listed in SAM.gov?

11 If YES to 8 or 9 and NO to 10 please list your 5 highest paid officers, if less than 5 please disregard.

a.
b.
c.
d.
e

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER

PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.E
RE-A

SSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF THE COOPERATIVE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

DEVELOPER, AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES (TM 37211 –

SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF OPAL STREET AND

CANAL STREET)
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council approve the Assignment and Assumption Agreement to transfer Rights and Obligations from Sequanata Partners, LP, a California limited partnership to Sequanata Venture, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company for Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1, and Paramount Estates MDP Line C- 1, Stage 1 facilities.
2) That the City Council approve the Assignment and Assumption Agreement to transfer Rights and Obligations from Sequan ata Venture, LLC, a Delaware limited partnership to Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation for Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1, and Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1 facilities.

BACKGROUND
A
s required by the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map 37211 (Project), the developer must construct certain flood control facilities in order to provide flood protection and drainage for their project and surrounding development. On October 1, 2020, the City Council approved a three-party cooperative agreement between Sequanata Partners, LP (Developer), the Riverside County Flood Control District (District) and the City of Jurupa Valley for the construction and maintenance of flood control facilities in order to provide

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

the required flood protection for the development. The proposed construction includes large diameter pipes (District Facilities) which will be owned and maintained by the District and which will outlet to existing District facilities (Sunnyslope Channel). The Developer and the District will construct all of the necessary facilities. The City will own and maintain the catch basins, connector pipes, and inlets located within the City right of way.

ANALYSIS

Pursuant to the original three- party executed Cooperative Agreement, the agreement may be transferred upon written consent of the Parties involved. Ownership of the property in question has been deeded by Sequanata Partners, LP to Sequanata Venture, LLC. Accordingly, the Cooperative Agreement is required to be re- assigned to the new owner and all parties have consented.

The new ownership, Sequanata Venture, has begun grading the project site and is in the final stages of selling the property to Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc. Once the sale has been completed, the Cooperative Agreement will need to be re- assigned from Sequan ata V enture to the new owner, Richmond American Homes. The sale is expected to be completed by the end of February and approval of this agreement is required to complete the sale.

Staff is recommending the City Council approv e the two agreements to ensure appropriate owners are responsible for the maintenance of new drainage infrastructure and to facilitate the development the Project. The second agreement will be executed upon transfer of the property to the new owner.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The Assignment and Assumption agreements will have no financial impact to the City.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 4

Attachments:

1. Assignment and Assumption Agreement to transfer Rights and Obligations from Sequanata Partners, LP, to Sequanata Venture, LLC

2. Assignment and Assumption Agreement to transfer Rights and Obligations from Sequanata Venture, LLC, to Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc.

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 1 -

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
This Assignment and Assumption Agreement ("ASSIGNMENT") is made by and between (i) the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, a body politic ("DISTRICT"); (ii) the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation (" CITY "); (iii) Sequanota Partners, LP, a California limited partnership ("ASSIGNOR"); and (iv) Sequanota Venture, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("ASSIGNEE"), (together, referred to as the "Parties" and individually as "Party"). The Parties hereto agree as follows:

RECITALS
A. DISTRICT, CITY and ASSIGNOR have previously entered into that certain Cooperative Agreement which was executed on November 17, 2020, (DISTRICT's Board Agenda Item No. 11.1) (" AGREEMENT"), setting forth the respective rights and obligations concerning ASSIGNOR's proposed design and construction of certain flood control and drainage facilities required as a condition of approval for Tract Map No. 37211, located in the city of Jurupa Valley in the State of California and hereinafter called the "PROPERTY"; and B. S ubsequent to the execution of said AGREEMENT , ASSIGNEE has acquired fee title to PROPERTY pursuant to a certain Grant Deed dated December 29, 2023, and plans to proceed in accordance with the AGREEMENT; and
C. Pursuant to the AGREEMENT, ASSIGNOR constructed or caused to be constructed the required Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1, and Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1 facilities as shown on DISTRICTꞌs Drawing No. 1-0732; and D. A true and correct copy of the AGREEMENT has been provided to ASSIGNEE.

The AGREEMENT describes the terms and conditions by which those certain flood control and drainage improvements that are required in connection with the development of Tract Map No.

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 2 -
37211 are to be designed and constructed by ASSIGNOR and inspected and accepted for operation and maintenance by DISTRICT and CITY; and
D. Section IV.14 of the AGREEMENT stipulates that ASSIGNOR may assign its rights and responsibilities as set forth therein subject to the written consent of the parties thereto; and E. The totality of ASSIGNOR's rights, title, interests, benefits and privileges pursuant to the AGREEMENT, and the totality of ASSIGNOR' s obligations or responsibilities pursuant to the AGREEMENT, are hereinafter collectively called "RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS"; and G. ASSIGNOR, ASSIGNEE, CITY, and DISTRICT intend that, by execution of this ASSIGNMENT, ASSIGNEE shall assume and agrees to perform all RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS as stated in the AGREEMENT; and
H. Section IV.17 of the AGREEMENT provides that the AGREEMENT may be changed or modified subject to the written consent of the Parties thereto; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding Recitals and the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the Parties hereto do hereby mutually agree as follows:

1. The above Recitals are true and correct and incorporated into the terms of this ASSIGNMENT.

2. By execution of this ASSIGNMENT, ASSIGNOR hereby assigns all of its RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS to ASSIGNEE and ASSIGNEE a ccepts and assumes the RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS.

3. For the benefit of DISTRICT and CITY, ASSIGNEE hereby agrees to be fully bound by the terms of the AGREEMENT that are stated and imposed on ASSIGNOR in the AGREEMENT. ASSIGNOR is referred to as DEVELOPER in the AGREEMENT.

4. In regard to the assignment of RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS set forth herein, DISTRICT and CITY hereby consent and agree to (i) the assignment of RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS in favor of ASSIGNEE, and (ii) the assumption by ASSIGNEE of said RIGH TS P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 3 -
AND OBLIGATIONS. In further clarification of the intent of the P arties, ASSIGNEE and ASSIGNOR specifically agree with DISTRICT that access and/or grant of real property interests required by DISTRICT pursuant to the AGREEMENT, if any, shall be satisfie d by ASSIGNEE, and in regard to all financial obligations, DISTRICT shall invoice ASSIGNEE for all charges incurred pursuant to the AGREEMENT that are incurred by DISTRICT but which are the responsibility of ASSIGNEE.

5. The assignment and assumption of RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS pursuant to this ASSIGNMENT shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, assigns, personal representatives, heirs and legatees of the respective Parties hereto.

6. In the event that any action or suit by a Party hereto is brought against another Party hereunder by reason of any breach of any of the covenants, conditions, agreements or provisions on the part of the other Party arising out of this ASSIGNMENT, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other Party all costs and expenses of the action or suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees.

7. This ASSIGNMENT is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

8. If any provision in this ASSIGNMENT is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

9. Nothing in the provisions of this ASSIGNMENT is intended to c reate duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not Parties to this ASSIGNMENT.

10. This ASSIGNMENT may be changed or modified only upon the written consent of the Parties hereto.

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 4 -

11. Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to ASSIGNEE arising from either this ASSIGNMENT, or the obligations contained in the AGREEMENT will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses:

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 8930 Limonite Avenue
1995 Market Street Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Paul Toor
Attn: Contract Services Section Public Works Director/City Engineer

SEQUANOTA PARTNERS, LP SEQUANOTAL VENTURE, LLC
556 South Fair Oaks Avenue, #337 556 South Fair Oaks Avenue, #337 Pasadena, CA 91105 Pasadena, CA 91105
Attn: Paul Onufer Attn: Paul Onufer

12. The individuals executing this ASSIGNMENT on behalf of ASSIGNEE hereby certify that they have the authority within their respective companies to enter into and execute this ASSIGNMENT, and have been authorized to do so by any and all boards of directors, legal counsel and/or any other board, committee or other entity within their respective companies which have the authority to authorize or deny entering into this ASSIGNMENT.

13. Any action at law or in equity brought by any of the Parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by the ASSIGNMENT, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of California, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceedings to any other county.

14. This ASSIGNMENT is the result of negotiations between the Parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this ASSIGNMENT was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no importance or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this ASSIGNMENT shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this ASSIGNMENT in its final form.

15. This ASSIGNMENT may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 5 -
Electronic signatures shall be treated the same as original signatures and electronically transmitted signatures shall be binding upon the Party delivering such signature in the same manner as an original signature.
//
//
P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 6 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this ASSIGNMENT on

_____________________________.
(to be filled in by General Manager-Chief Engineer)

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
a body corporate and politic

By:

JASON E. UHLEY
General Manager-Chief Engineer

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MINH TRAN
County Counsel

By:

NAME
Deputy County Counsel

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
AMR:blm
12/05/23

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 7 -
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

By

ROD BUTLER
City Manager

By

GUILLERMO SILVA
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ATTEST:

By
PETER M. THORSON
City Attorney

By

VICTORIA WASKO
City Clerk

(SEAL)

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
AMR:blm
12/05/23

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 8 -

ASSIGNOR

SEQUANOTA PARTNERS, LP,
a California limited partnership

By: JPMB Investments, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
its General Partner

By ____________________________

PAUL ONUFER
Managing Member

(ATTACH NOTARY WITH CAPACITY

STATEMENT)

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
AMR:blm
12/05/23

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 9 -

ASSIGNEE

SEQUANOTA VENTURE, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: Sequanota Partners, LP,
a California limited partnership

By: JPMB Investments, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
its General Partner

By ____________________________

PAUL ONUFER
Managing Member

(ATTACH NOTARY WITH CAPACITY

STATEMENT)

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 10 -

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 11 -

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

P8/
84615.003 - 392647.2 - 12 -

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name( s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 1 -

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
This Assignment and Assumption Agreement ("ASSIGNMENT") is made by and between (i) the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, a body politic ("DISTRICT"); (ii) the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation (" CITY "); (iii) Sequanota Venture, LLC , a Delaware limited partnership (" ASSIGNOR"); and (iv) Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation (" ASSIGNEE"), (together, referred to as the "Parties" and individually as "Party"). The Parties hereto agree as follows:

RECITALS
A. DISTRICT, CITY and ASSIGNOR have previously entered int o that certain Cooperative Agreement which was executed on November 17, 2020, (DISTRICT's Board Agenda Item No. 11.1) (" AGREEMENT"), setting forth the respective rights and obligations concerning ASSIGNOR's proposed design and construction of certain flood control and drainage facilities required as a condition of approval for Tract Map No. 37211, located in the city of Jurupa Valley in the State of California and hereinafter called the "PROPERTY"; and B. Subsequent to the execution of said AGREEMENT , ASSIGNEE has acquired fee title to PROPERTY pursuant to a certain Grant Deed dated PENDING, and plans to proceed in accordance with the AGREEMENT; and
C. Pursuant to the AGREEMENT, ASSIGNOR constructed or caused to be constructed the required Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1, and Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1 facilities as shown on DISTRICTꞌs Drawing No. 1-0732; and D. A true and correct copy of the AGREEMENT has been provided to ASSIGNEE.

The AGREEMENT describes the terms and conditions by which those certain flood control and drainage improvements that are required in connection with the development of Tract Map No.

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 2 -
37211 are to be designed and constructed by ASSIGNOR and inspected and accepted for operation and maintenance by DISTRICT and CITY; and
D. Section IV.14 of the AGREEMENT stipulates that ASSIGNOR may assign its rights and responsibilities as set forth therein subject to the written consent of the parties thereto; and E. The totality of ASSIGNOR's rights, title, interests, benefits and privileges pursuant to the AGREEMENT, and the totality of ASSIGNOR' s obligations or responsibilities pursuant to the AGREEMENT, are hereinafter collectively called "RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS"; and G. ASSIGNOR, ASSIGNEE, CITY, and DISTRICT intend that, by execution of this ASSIGNMENT, ASSIGNEE shall assume and agrees to perform all RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS as stated in the AGREEMENT; and
H. Section IV.17 of the AGREEMENT provides that the AGREEMENT may b e changed or modified subject to the written consent of the Parties thereto; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding Recitals and the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the Parties hereto do hereby mutually agree as follows:

1. The above Re citals are true and correct and incorporated into the terms of this ASSIGNMENT.

2. By execution of this ASSIGNMENT, ASSIGNOR hereby assigns all of its RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS to ASSIGNEE and ASSIGNEE accepts and assumes the RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS.

3. For the benefit of DISTRICT and CITY, ASSIGNEE hereby agrees to be fully bound by the terms of the AGREEMENT that are stated and imposed on ASSIGNOR in the AGREEMENT. ASSIGNOR is referred to as DEVELOPER in the AGREEMENT.

4. In regard to the assignment of RI GHTS AND OBLIGATIONS set forth herein, DISTRICT and CITY hereby consent and agree to (i) the assignment of RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS in favor of ASSIGNEE, and (ii) the assumption by ASSIGNEE of said RIGHTS T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 3 -
AND OBLIGATIONS. In further clarification of the intent of the P arties, ASSIGNEE and ASSIGNOR specifically agree with DISTRICT that access and/or grant of real property interests required by DISTRICT pursuant to the AGREEMENT, if any, shall be satisfied by ASSIGNEE, and in regard to all financial obligations, DISTRICT shall invoice ASSIGNEE for all charges incurred pursuant to the AGREEMENT that are incurred by DISTRICT but which are the responsibility of ASSIGNEE.

5. The assignment and assumption of RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS pursuant to this ASSIGNMENT shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, assigns, personal representatives, heirs and legatees of the respective Parties hereto.

6. In the event that any action or suit by a Party hereto is brought against another Party hereunder by reason of any breach of any of the covenants, conditions, agreements or provisions on the part of the other Party arising out of this ASSIGNMENT, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other Party all costs and expenses of the action or suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees.

7. This ASSIGNMENT is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

8. If any provision in this ASSIGNMENT is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

9. Nothing in the provisions of this ASSIGNMENT is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not Parties to this ASSIGNMENT.

10. This ASSIGNMENT may be changed or modified only upon the written consent of the Parties hereto.

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 4 -

11. Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to ASSIGNEE arising from either this ASSIGNMENT, or the obligations contained in the AGREEMENT will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses:

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 8930 Limonite Avenue
1995 Market Street Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Paul Toor
Attn: Contract Services Section Public Works Director/City Engineer

SEQUANOTA VENTURE, LLC RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF
556 South Fair Oaks Avenue, #337 MARYLAND, INC.

Pasadena, CA 91105 391 N. Main Street, Suite 205
Attn: Paul Onufer Corona, CA 92880
Attn: Edgar Gomez

12. The individuals executing this ASSIGNMENT on behalf of ASSIGNEE hereby certify that they have the authority within their respective companies to enter into and execute this ASSIGNMENT, and have been authorized to do so by any and all boards of directors, legal counsel and/or any other board, committee or other entity within their respective companies which have the authority to authorize or deny entering into this ASSIGNMENT.

13. Any action at law or in equity brought by any of the Parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by the ASSIGNMENT, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of California, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceedings to any other county.

14. This ASSIGNMENT is the result of negotiations between the Parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this ASSIGNMENT was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no importance or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this ASSIGNMENT shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this ASSIGNMENT in its final form.

15. This ASSIGNMENT may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same i nstrument.

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 5 -
Electronic signatures shall be treated the same as original signatures and electronically transmitted signatures shall be binding upon the Party delivering such signature in the same manner as an original signature.
//
//
T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 6 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this ASSIGNMENT on

_____________________________.
(to be filled in by General Manager-Chief Engineer)

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
a body corporate and politic

By:

JASON E. UHLEY
General Manager-Chief Engineer

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MINH TRAN
County Counsel

By:

NAME
Deputy County Counsel

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
AMR:blm
12/05/23

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 7 -
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

By

ROD BUTLER
City Manager

By

GUILLERMO SILVA
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ATTEST:

By
PETER M. THORSON
City Attorney

By

VICTORIA WASKO
City Clerk

(SEAL)

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
AMR:blm
12/05/23

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 8 -

ASSIGNOR

SEQUANOTA VENTURE, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: Sequanota Partners, LP,
a California limited partnership

By: JPMB Investments, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
its General Partner

By ____________________________

PAUL ONUFER
Managing Member

(ATTACH NOTARY WITH CAPACITY

STATEMENT)

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1
Project No. 1-0-00266
Tract Map No. 37211
AMR:blm
12/05/23
T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 9 -

ASSIGNEE

RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF
MARYLAND, INC.,
a Maryland corporation

By ____________________________
ALEXANDER C. WONG
Division President

(ATTACH NOTARY WITH CAPACITY

STATEMENT)

Assignment and Assumption Agreement:

Paramount Estates MDP Line C, Stage 1
Paramount Estates MDP Line C-1, Stage 1

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 10 -

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/t heir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

T2/
84615.003 - 393911.2 - 11 -

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )

On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
D
ATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
21256: GENERAL PLAN AME NDMENT ( GPA) NO. 21008 , AND
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 3 8171; FOR THE PROJECT
ENTITLED: “SADDLEHORN RANCH RESIDENTIAL,” A 19.36-ACRE
SUBDIVISION CONSISTING OF 31 SINGLE -FAMILY LOTS AND

CERTIFYING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, MAKING

FINDINGS, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING

CONSIDERATIONS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM; LOCATION: 6550 LIMONITE AVENUE
(APN: 186-160-021); (APPLICANT: RC HOBBS COMPANY)

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive testimony, and:
a. A
dopt Resolution No. 2024-05, entitled:

A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT, MAKING FINDINGS , ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF

OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR MA 21256 WHICH INCLUDES
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21008 AND TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO 38171, AND AN OVERRIDING OF THE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION’S FINDING OF INCONSISTENCY TO PERMIT THE
SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 19.36 GROSS ACRES INTO 31
SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6550

LIMONITE AVENUE (SADDLEHORN RANCH)

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

b. Adopt Resolution No. 2024- 06 entitled, by a four affirmative “yes” votes (2/3 vote):

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38171;

AND OVERRULLING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE

COMMISSION'S (ALUC) INCONSISTENCY DECISION TO PERMIT
THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 19.36 GROSS ACRES INTO 31 SINGLE -FAMILY LOTS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6550

LIMONITE AVENUE (SADDLEHORN RANCH)
c. That the City Council consider the proposed General Plan Amendm ent No. 21008 and then consider adopting Resolution No. 2024- 07 adopting the combined General Plan Technical Amendments and General Plan Amendment No. 21008 as part of Item No. 15.C, General Plan Amendments batch.

PROPOSAL
The proposed project, Saddlehorn Ranch Residential, consists of the subdivision of 19.36 acres of land into 31 lots for single-family detached homes at a density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development would also include the following site improvements: street improvements; individual lot and streetscape landscaping; retention basin; and walls and fencing (“the project”).

The proposed project would require the following entitlements and approvals:

1. General Plan Amendment (GPA): Change the land use designation from Ranch (EDR) to Country Neighborhood (LD R). The project proposes a density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre. EDR allows for a maximum of .5 dwelling units per acre and LDR allows for a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre.

2. Tentative Tract Map (TTM): Subdivide 19.3 acres into 31 single- family lots, one internal street, and one detention basin.

3. ALUC Inconsistency Overrule. The project requires the City Council to overrule the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission’s finding of inconsistency with the 2004 Flabob Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Overrule requires a two- thirds vote of the City Council.

PROJECT LOCATION
The project site consists of 19.36 acres of sparsely developed land located at 6550 Limonite Avenue. The site is bordered by Limonite Frontage Road and a single -family home to the west, Riverview Drive to the east, single family residential to the north, and residential/agricultural uses to the south. The site is near the Rancho Jurupa Regional Sports Park, Rancho Jurupa Park, Santa Ana River, Peralta Elementary School, and the

Page | 3

Flabob Airport. Exhibit 1 shows the project site location. Table 1 outlines the general information on the project site and surrounding land uses . Exhibits 2 and 3 show the project site zoning and General Plan land use classifications.

EXHIBIT 1: PROJECT SITE

Page | 4

Table 1: Project Information and Surrounding Land Uses
Location
Current
Land Use
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
Zoning
Site Single-Family
Residential and
vacant land.

EDR (Ranch) A-1 (Light Agriculture)
North Single-Family
Residential
EDR (Ranch)
MDR (Medium
Density
Residential)
R-A (Residential Agriculture)
R-1-80 (One Family Dwelling)
South Single-Family
Residential and
Horse Ranches.

EDR (Ranch)
LDR (Country
Neighborhood)
A-1(Light Agriculture)
R-A (Residential Agriculture)
East Riverview Drive and
Single-Family
Residential.

EDR (Ranch) A-1(Light Agriculture)
West Limonite Frontage
Road, Single Family
Residential,
Limonite Avenue.

LDR (Country
Neighborhood)
MDR (Medium
Density
Residential)
R-A (Residential Agriculture)
R-1-80 (One Family Dwelling)

EXHIBIT 2: PROJECT SITE ZONING (A-1)

EXHIBIT 3: PROJECT SITE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE (EDR)

Page | 5

BACKGROUND
Planning Commission Study Session
On August 11, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a Study Session to review, discuss and provide feedback on the Applicant's initial submittal. The topics that were discussed included d
ensity, access, Municipal Airport Overlay – Flabob, equestrian routes, Fire Department review, HOA recommended for subdivision, cost of proposed homes, and n otification. The August 11, 2021 Planning Commission minutes are provided as Attachment 6.

Planning Commission Public Hearing
On December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered the project. The Planning Commission deliberated and discussed the following items:
• Emergency access
• Horse trails
• ALUC restriction of three above ground habitable floors • Existing Edison easement and fencing
• Existing density permitted
• Number of horses permitted
• ALUC Plan inconsistency
After the discussion, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC-2023-18 (Attachment 7), on a 3-1 vote, recommending that the City Council approve the project.

The December 13, 2023 Planning Commission meeting minutes excerpts are provided as Attachment 8.

Page | 6

PROJECT DESIGN AND SITE LAYOUT
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential is proposed to consist of a 31- single-family home subdivision. The single-family lots would range in size from 20,102 square feet to 57,257 square feet. Three home models are proposed, ranging in size from 2,861 square feet to 3,492 square feet. All three home plans are one story with t hree car garages. There is one internal street proposed with access off Riverview Drive, a roundabout proposed midway through the subdivision, and a cul -de-sac at the west end of the property . The topography of the sit e rise approximately 110 feet from the building lots closest to Riverview Drive to the lots at the end of the cul-de-sac. As such, the site would be graded to create terraces between lots ranging in height from approximately 6- feet to 12- feet.

Exhibit 4 shows the conceptual site plan for Saddlehorn Ranch Residential with key project features labeled.

EXHIBIT 4: SITE PLAN

Access and Circulation. Access to the subdivision would be provided by “A” Street that would connect to Riverview Drive. “A” Street would be a public cul-de-sac street with a 56-foot wide right of way. The street would include a 36-foot-wide roadway with a 5-foot landscape parkway and 5- foot sidewalk on both sides of the street . Parking would be allowed on both sides of the street. A central roundabout is included to enable emergency vehicle turnarounds if needed. Primary access is not proposed from Limonite Frontage

Page | 7

Road. However, a 24- foot-wide secondary emergency access road would be provided from the end of the cul -de-sac to the Limonite Frontage Road. Exhibit 5 illustrates the secondary emergency access road. The Riverview Drive street frontage will be improved with new street paving and a 6- foot landscape parkway and 8- foot decomposed granite (DG) trail that would facilitate a future secondary equestrian trail.

EXHIBIT 5: SECONDARY EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD

Architecture and Design. Three home plans are proposed. All are detached single-story models with three- car garages. The three plans are detailed in Table 2 and Exhibit 6 illustrates examples of each of the various architectural styles.

TABLE 2: SIZE OF HOMES AND FLOOR AREA RATIOS (FARS)
Plan Number Living Area
(sf)
Garage (sf) Total Footprint (sf) FAR
Plan 1* 2,861 sf 677 sf 3,538 sf .18
Plan 2 3,239 sf 747 sf 3,986 sf .20
Plan 3 3,492 sf 799 sf 4,291 sf .21
*Includes optional 153 sf den/hobby room with 523 sf garage with similar footprint and FAR

The plans consist of next generation living spaces that include flexible rooms to serve the needs of multiple generations of family members and diverse lifestyles (e.g., rooms can

Page | 8

serve as office, gym, or game room). Although the proposed homes are large, ranging from 2,861 to 3,492 square feet of living space, the Floor Area Ratios (FARs) of the homes are low, ranging from .18 to .21. Traditional neighborhood homes that are one story are generally designed with floor areas that are less than half the size of the lot (maximum .40 FAR). Saddlehorn Ranch proposes low FARs with large lots of at least 20,000 sf to create a spacious low-density development. The proposed building architectural style is Farmhouse and Mission with traditional roofing materials, design elements and articulation consistent with the prescribed architectural style. Exhibit 6 illustrates the proposed building elevations.

EXHIBIT 6: ELEVATIONS

Landscaping. Generous landscaping would be included throughout the project designed to reflect traditional neighborhoods with tree-lined streets and large landscape front yards.

The plan includes a minimum of two canopy trees in the 5-foot-wide parkway in front of each home, as well as one accent tree in the front yard setback area. In addition, canopy street trees would be provided along the Riverview Drive street frontage. All plants would be compliant with California Green Building requirements for water conservation and the California Invasive Plant Council requirements for non- invasive plants. In addition, the final landscape plan would be required to comply with the water efficiency landscape design requirements of the zoning code. Exhibit 7 below shows the proposed landscape site plan.

Page | 9

Walls and Fences. Each residential lot will contain six -foot high solid decorative block walls along the rear property lines and vinyl fencing along the side property lines. A wrought fence and gate will enclose the retention basin. Small retaining walls may be necessary on the sloped terrace areas between each residential lot. Exhibit 8 below shows the proposed fence and wall details.

EXHIBIT 7: LANDSCAPE PLAN

Page | 10

EXHIBIT 8: FENCE AND WALL DETAILS

ANALYSIS
I. GENERAL PLAN. The project will require an amendment to the General Plan land use designation to allow the proposed project at the subject site.

A. General Plan Land Use Designation. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Ranch ( EDR), which allows for a maximum of .5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed General Plan land use designation is Country Neighborhood (LDR). LDR allows for a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre which will accommodate the p roject density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre. Please see Attachment 5 - General Plan Amendment Exhibit. With redesignation to LDR, the project would demonstrate consistency with the Land Use Element of the General Plan including the following policies:
• LUE 2.1 Residential Development. Accommodate the development of single -family and multi -family residential units in areas appropriately designated by the General P lan, specific plans, the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay, and community and town center plans land use maps.

The proposed project is for a residential development on land that has a proposed General Plan Land Use Designation of Country Neighborhood (LDR) – Up to two (2) dwelling units per acre. • LUE 2.3 Infrastructure. Ensure that circulation facilities, water resources, sewer and storm drainage facilities, and other utilities available or provided by the developer are adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses.

Page | 11

All street improvements, drainage infrastructure, and other utilities are found to be adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents.
• LUE 2.4 Housing Quality and Variety. Accommodate the
development of a variety of highest quality housing types, styles and densities that are accessible to and meet the needs of a range of lifestyles, physical abilities, and income levels.

The project introduces a high-quality low density large lot traditional neighborhood housing type similar to housing types in the vicinity to meet the needs of a specific niche of people with a distinct lifestyle and income level. The project includes n ext generation living spaces that include flexible rooms to serve the needs of multiple generations of family members and diverse lifestyles (e.g., rooms can serve as an office, gym, or game room)
• LUE 2.9 Design Compatibility. Ensure that the new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their
surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of
neighborhoods and adjacent structures.

The proposed project successfully incorporates Mission and Farmhouse architectural styles that are compatible with the surrounding area.
• LUE 5.4 Residential Development . Require that residential development proposed near existing equestrian neighborhoods shall be designed to be equestrian friendly and integrate the new neighborhoods with the existing equestrian lifestyle as an asset to future residents. Land within the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay shall be developed to promote and protect the semi -rural equestrian lifestyle within it.

The project incorporates a 6-foot landscape parkway and 8- foot decomposed granite (DG) trail along the Riverview Drive project frontage that would facilitate a future secondary equestrian trail on Riverview Drive.
• LUE 10 .9 Promote Unique Community Character. Use
community plans to promote the development and preservation of unique communities in which each community exhibits a special sense of place and quality of design.

The proposed project reinforces the larger lot , low density , rural community theme of the vicinity through its inclusion of high-quality Farmhouse and Mission architecture, traditional neighborhood streetscape and landscaping, and enhanced entryways.

Page | 12

• LUE 13.1 Fair Share Infrastructure Funding. Require that new development contribute its fair share to fund infrastructure and public facilities, such as police and fire facilities, parks, streets, and trail improvements.

The applicant would be required to contribute over $230 ,000 in Development Impact Fees (DIFs) which would be allocated to fund fire services, roads, parks, schools, libraries, and other public facilities.

II. ZONING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The project is subject to the A -1 (Light Agriculture) Development Standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all applicable development standards and no adjustments or variances are required. Table 3 below outlines the project’s compliance with the applicable Zoning Code development standards.

TABLE 3: LIGHT AGRICULTURE (A-1)

APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD REQUIRED

MINIMUM

PROJECT

COMPLIANCE
Lot Requirements
Minimum Lot Size 20,000 sf
Yes. All lots would be a
minimum of 20,000 sf in
size.

Minimum Average
Lot Width 100’
Yes. All lots would be a
minimum of 100 ft in
average lot width.

Minimum Average
Lot Depth 150’
Yes. All lots would have
a minimum average lot
depth of 150’.

Setbacks REQUIRED

MINIMUM

PROJECT

COMPLIANCE
Front Yard 20’
Yes. All homes would
have a minimum front
yard setback of 20’.

Page | 13

Interior Side Yard 5’
Yes. All homes would
have a minimum interior
side yard setback of 5’.

Street Side Yard 10’
Yes. All homes would
have a minimum street
side yard setback of 10’.

Rear Yard 5’
Yes. All homes would
have a minimum rear
yard setback of 5’.

Other Development Standards
Height
Requirements 40’ max
Yes. All homes are
single-story and would
not exceed 40’ in height.

Off Street Parking
Requirements
2 Spaces/Dwelling
Each home would
include a three- (3) car
garage and additional
driveway parking.

III. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING REQUIREMENT (CHAPTER 9.267). The proposed project would be subject to the City's Inclusionary Housing Requirement of seven (7) percent affordable homes, which would translate into two (2) homes. The applicant would also have the option to pay an in- lieu fee of $2.50 per square foot, which would translate to an approximately $310,000 in-lieu fee. The project's compliance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordi nance is included as a recommended condition of approval.

IV. TITLE 7 - SUBDIVISIONS. The proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38171 complies with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act. The Engineering Department has reviewed the project for required travel lanes, access, circulation, traffic impacts, grading, and drainage. The recommended conditions address areas such as subdivision, circulation, access, grading, drainage, and water quality. The applicant shall be responsible for on- site and off -site improvements including street improvements, storm drain/drainage improvements, signing, striping and pavement markings, streetlights, landscape and irrigation systems, water systems, and sanitary sewer systems.

V. FLABOB AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONES. The subject site is located within the Flabob Airport Compatibility Zone. To allow the continued, orderly operation and, where appropriate, expansion of airports, the City and the County have adopted land use measures th at minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards. To accomplish this, the State of

Page | 14

California adopted the Airport Land Use Law, California Public Utilities Code Section 21670-21679.5. The General Plan is intended to implement and be consistent with the purposes of the Airport Land Use Law. The Airport Land Use Law provides for the creation of the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC or Commission) and the adoption of airport land use compatibility plans by the Commission to assist the County and affected cities in land use planning in the vicinity of airports. The Commission has adopted an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for Western Riverside County (ALUP), which applies to all cities in Western Riverside County and i ncludes policies and compatibility criteria for Flabob and the Riverside Municipal airports.

At its closest point , the project site is located approximately 3,320 feet southeast of the Flabob Airport runway, a general aviation airport which began operations in 1925. The airport has an approved Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUP) from 2004, which establishes safety or compatibility zones around the airport to facilitate safe and efficient air operations at the airport. The ALUP contains a Compatibility Map for the Flabob Airport, see Exhibit 9.

Page | 15

EXHIBIT 9: Flabob Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones
(and Project Site)

The project site is located within two airport compatibility Zones C (17.95 acres) and D (0.6 acres). Zone C requires a land use density less than or equal to 0.2 dwelling units per acre and 20% open space requirement with a minimum width of 75 feet and length of 300 feet at a general or specific plan level or when a project is 10 acres or more. Zone D limits residential density to 0.2 to 0.4 du/ac with a 10% open space requirement.

On October 14 , 2021, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Development Review Staff report and October 18, 2021 Determination Letter for case number ZAP1036FL21 (Attachment No’s. 9 and 10), was issued that determined the requested entitlements of the proposed project were inconsistent with the 2004 Flabob Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan as follows:

1) Density Limits. The ALUC determined the project was not consistent with the Flabob ALUP due to the following residential density restrictions of Zones C and D:
• Zone C limit of residential density to 0.2 du/ac
• Zone D limit of residential density is either below 0.2 dwelling units per acre or above 5.0 dwelling units per acre.

Page | 16

Additionally, the ALUC reviewed the project under County Wide Policy 3.3.1 (Infill) which allows for greater densities than would otherwise be permitted in Zones C and D but caps t he densities at double the allowable density for the zone. Doubling the density increases the limit from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre for Zone C, and from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre (on the low end), and from 5.0 to 10.0 dwelling units per acre (on the high end) for Zone D.

Under
the ALUP doubled density provision, only 7 units would be allowed in Zone C under the 0.4 du/acre, and 6 units in Zone D under the 10 du/acre allowable density.

The maximum number of units under the ALUP would only
permit up to 13 units; therefore, the project at 31 units is inconsistent within the ALUP density requirements.

The ALUC noted that although the Project exceeds or is not consistent with the Zone C and D restrictions for residential density or open space requirements, the project proposes no uses that are specifically prohibited within Zones C and D (e.g., day care centers, building with 3 aboveground habitable floors, etc.).

2) Open Space Requirement. The ALUC also found that the project fails to provide the required open space areas for emergency landings. Projects 10 acres or larger are required to meet the foll owing open area requirements to potentially serve as emergency landing areas: Compatibility Zone C requires 20% of open area and Zone D requires 10% of open area. The ALUC staff report indicated that approximately 17.95 acres are located within Zone C requiring 3.59 acres of open space , and approximately 0.6 acres are located within Zone D requiring 0.06 acres of open space for a total of 3.65 acres of contiguous open space requirements. The project provides approximately 3 acres of non-contiguous open area, which includes yards and streets.

3) Water Quality Basins. The ALUC found that the project had not accepted or confirmed provisions for water quality basin(s) to reduce Hazards to Flight concerning wildlife populations on or near airports that could significantly increase the potential for Bird Aircraft Strike Hazards (BASH). To reduce the potential Hazards to Flight impacts from BASH to less than significant , Mitigation Measure (MM) Haz -1 is required and should be imposed on the project. The mitigation is provided below.

MM-Haz-1 Airport Hazardous Wildlife Attraction Mitigation:
• The water quality basin (WQB) shall be designed to provide a 48- hour drawdown time during a 24-hour rainfall event.
• Regular maintenance shall be provided to elim inate seeding, shelter, and unsuitable vegetation.
• Establish a planting, maintenance, and management plan for the WQB and the surrounding areas to ensure compliance with the ALUC requirements. The plan should specifically address measures to

Page | 17

minimize attra ctiveness of the proposed basin for hazardous bird species.
• Proposed plantings for the project used to landscape the WQB shall comply with the ALUC’s landscaping brochure recommendations to avoid landscaping or provide appropriate landscaping that will not attract hazardous wildlife.
• Per the ALUC’s Landscaping Near Airports brochure recommendations, trees planted around the proposed WQB should be spaced to prevent overlapping crown structures. In addition, planting trees with verifiable canopy heights, as noted in the ALUC brochure is recommended. • The WQB shall be designed to include slopes greater than 2:1 or 3:1 in the “hydromod” portions of the facility in order to minimize shelter and nesting opportunities for hazardous wildlife.
• Per the ALUC a notice sign, shall be permanently affixed to the stormwater basin with the following language: “There is an airport nearby. This stormwater basin is designed to hold stormwater for only 48 hours and not attract birds. Proper maintenance is necessary to avoid bird strikes”. The sign will also include the name, telephone number or other contact information of the person or entity responsible to monitor the WQB basin.

4) Process to Overrule ALUC’s Inconsistency Decision. Pursuant to the Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 21676 (b), the local agency (City Council) may, after a public hearing, propose to overrule the Commission (ALUC) by a two-thirds vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of this article stated in Section 21670. At least 45 days prior to the decision to overrule the Commission , the local agency governing body shall provide the Commission and the Division (State of California Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division) a copy of the proposed decision and findings.

The Commission and the Division may provide comments to the local agency governing body within 30 days of receiving the proposed decision and findings.

If the Commission or Division's comments are not available within this time limit, the local agency governing body may act without them. The comments by the Division or the Commission are advisory to the local agency governing body.

The local agency governing body shall include comments from the Commission and division in the public record of any final decision to overrule the Commission, which may only be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the governing body.

Page | 18

VI. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL TO OVERRIDE ALUC'S
INCONSISTENCY DECISION. The specific findings required to overrule a Commission's inconsistency determination are specified in Public Utilities Code Section 21670(a)(2) as follows: “It is the purpose of this article to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around p ublic airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses." While the ALUC determined the project is not consistent with the Flabob Airport ALUP, the City’s CEQA significance threshold is based on whether the project would “result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area” and not strictly whether it is consistent with the ALUP.

To that end, the applicant submitted a safety evaluation of the proposed project prepared by Allen Aviation Consul tant Services, LLC. (Attachment No. 11).

The Allen Aviation Aeronautical Obstruction Evaluation Study report prepared a Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 evaluation of the project for objects affecting navigable airspace. According to the Federal A viation Administration (FAA), the federal regulation establishes requirements to notify the FAA of certain construction or alterations and obstruction standards for proposed construction or alteration of existing structures. Any object that exceeds Part 77 Obstruction Standards is considered an obstruction and presumed to be a hazard to air navigation unless further aeronautical study concludes the obstruction would not affect the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace and the operation of planned or existing air navigation and communication facilities. Part 77 applies to both existing and proposed objects as well as existing and planned runways. While this federal regulation mandates notice requirements and establishes obstruction standards, the FAA has no legal authority to prohibit construction of structures regardless of proximity to public use airports. State governments and/or local municipalities with zoning, permitting, and land (property) use authority can deny construction applications that would encroach on public use airports.

The Allen Aviation Report concluded the buildings in the project, as proposed, would not infringe on the imaginary surfaces of the navigable airspace or other safety criteria established for the Flabob Airport.

Additionally, the FAA issued “No Hazard to Air Navigation” Determination Letters for each of the proposed 31 lots in the Project. This analysis determined the project would also not have significant impacts on these airport safety and flight operations.

The proposed project is not consistent with the land use intensity limits or open space requirements of the Flabob ALUP. However, the Allen Aviation Report and FAA Determination Letters demonstrated the project would not result in

Page | 19

significant risks to airp ort operations or safety, or a significant risk to public health or safety. The Draft EIR for the Project demonstrates the proposed project is not fully consistent with all of the policies of the City General Plan relative to Flabob Airport. It is importan t to note the General Plan policy inconsistencies all result from the Project exceeding the land use intensity limits of the Flabob ALUP for both residential uses.

Based on the available information and erring on the side of caution, the Draft EIR concluded the project may result in a significant environmental impact in terms of airport hazards (i.e., Flabob ALUP inconsistency). Because there is no feasible mitigation for this impact, approval of the project will require adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations from the City Council if the project is approved due to this inconsistency with the Flabob ALUP.

Based on the facts and findings within the Allen Aviation Report and FAA Determination Letters , it is recommended that the City Council find and determine that the project will not have an impact on the public health, safety and welfare based on the following findings (Underline language are additions to the Planning Commission recommended findings in response to ALUC comments):

1. The proposed Project minimizes the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around the Flabob Airport in that the Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning the proposed construction of 31 homes that will be 21 feet above grade level on Tentative Tract Map No. 38171. All proposed lots have been issued “No Hazard to Air Navigation” Determination Letters by The Federal Aviation Administration dated January 20, 2023. This analysis determined the proposed structures within the project (single-family homes) do not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation.

2. The Flabob Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan depicts a portion of the project being located within the 55-60 CNEL contour range from aircraft noise, and a portion outside the 55-60 CNEL contour. Single- family residences are 'marginally acceptable' in this noise contour .

The proposed homes would be affected by aircraft generated noise.

However, standard construction is normally considered to provide a 15 dB reduction from exterior noise levels. A condition of approval has been included to incorporate noise attenuation measures into the design of the homes to such an extent as may be required to ensure that interior noise levels from aircraft operations are at or below 45 CNEL
, which is acceptable for single-family homes.

Page | 20

3. The area adjacent to the subject property is primarily residential. The area between Flabob Airport and the
project site is open space near
Flabob Airport and predominately residential thereafter. The area to the east of the
project site is open space and the Santa Ana River.

The open space near Flabob Airport, combined with the large undeveloped space along the Santa Ana River provides an unusually large area in case an aircraft suffering a catastrophic failure requires an emergency landing location. The proposed
project does not, in
any way, diminish this opportunity. The surrounding area is already devoted to residential densities incompatible with the ALUP.

Implementation of the required contiguous open space area which would be 3.65 acres of the 19-acre project site creates a hardship for the project as residential subdivisions immediately surrounding the project site do not contain open space areas consistent with the ALUC open space requirements.

4. Any measures that would effectively mitigate the impac ts of the proposed project regarding consistency with the Flabob ALUP density and open space requirements would require a reduction of residential units in the
project. Under the ALUP residential density
provisions and the County Wide policy 3.31 (Infill) that allow doubling of the allowable densities only 7 units would be allowed in Zone C under the 0. 4 du/acre, and 6 units in Zone D under the 10 du/acre allowable density. The maximum number of units under the ALUP would only permit up to 13 units; therefore, the Project would be inconsistent with ALUP density requirements. No feasible mitigation is available to eliminate the identified inconsistency of the project with
the Flabob ALUP, related to density or open space . Despite the inconsistency with the ALUP, the proposed 31 homes at a density of

1.6 dwelling units per acre has been issued "No Hazard to Air Navigation" Determination Letters by The Federal Aviation Administration dated January 20, 2023.

This analysis determined the
proposed structures within the project ( single-family homes) do not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation. Further, the Aeronautical Obstruction Evaluation Study prepared by Allen Aviation (Allen Aviation Report) for the project concluded the buildings in the project, as proposed, would not infringe on the imaginary surfaces of the navigable airspace or other safety criteria established for the Flabob Airport. Taken together, the Allen Aviation Report and FAA Determination Letters, as well as the open space near Flabob Airport, combined with the large undeveloped space along the Santa Ana River demonstrate the project would not result in significant risks to airport operations or safety, or a significant risk to public health or safety.

Page | 21

ALUC’s Response Letter to Proposed Overrule Findings
On December 28, 2023, Staff provided ALUC and the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Aeronautics Division the required 45- day notice advising these agencies of the City’s intent to overrule ALUC’s inconsistency decision (Attachment 12). Staff received response letters from ALUC and Caltrans (Attachments 13 and 14) . The following summarizes the ALUC and Caltrans letters and staff’s response.

• Finding #1. ALUC states that none of the findings consider inconsistency with ALUC Zone C density requirements.

Staff Response: Finding #4 does address the inconsistency with density. Clarifying language has been added to Finding #2 as noted in the underlined text.

• Finding #2. ALUC acknowledges that the project is consistent with noise contour requirements, but the analysis does not consider the likelihood of noise complaints from future residents.

Staff Response: Issues related to complaints are outside the scope of the noise contour consistency finding. As noted in the finding, the future homes would incorporate noise attenuation measures into the design of the homes to such an extent as may be required to ensure that interior noise levels from aircraft operations are at or below 45 CNEL.

Clarifying language has been
added to Finding #2 as noted in the underlined text.

• Finding #3. ALUC states that that the surrounding vacant land around the airport and the Santa Ana River area is insufficient for emergency landings.

Staff Response: The surrounding area is already devoted to residential densities incompatible with the ALUP. Implementation of the required open space area, which would be 3.65 acres of the 19- acre project site, creates a hardship for the project as residential subdivisions immediately surrounding the project site do not contain open space areas consistent with the ALUC open space
requirements. Clarifying language has been added to Finding #3 as noted in the underlined text. The project provides approximately 3 acres of non- contiguous open area, which includes yards and streets.

Page | 22

The City Council adopted a similar overrule finding for the mixed-use Mission Gateway Plaza project located at Mission Boulevard and Crestmore Road.

• Finding # 4 . ALUC states that the FAA No Hazard letters demonstrate the project would not result in a significant risk is inaccurate as the FAA determination does not cover density and open space.

Staff Response: Finding #3 addresses open space as noted above.

Clarifying language has been added to Finding #4 as noted in the underlined text.

The Caltrans letter reiterates support for the ALUC findings specifically related to the Open Space finding.

VII. FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION MAPS (SECTION 7.15.180) Pursuant to Title 7 (Subdivisions) - Chapter 7.15. - Tentative Maps, Section

7.15.180, a tentative tract map shall be denied if it does not meet all requirements of this title, or if any of the following findings are made.

A. The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 meets all requirements of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38171 is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act for standards and process.

Furthermore, the City’s Engineering Department has reviewed the project for access, circulation, grading, and drainage and has recommended conditions that would require the project to comply with mandated regulations.

B. That the proposed land division is not consistent with appl icable General and Specific Plans.

The proposed map is consistent with the requirements of the proposed General Plan land use designation of Country Neighborhood (LDR). LDR allows for a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre, which will accommodate the proposed Project density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre. Furthermore, the map complies with Title 7 (Subdivisions) and Title 9 (Planning and Zoning), with the approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21008.

C. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans.

The proposed layout of the Project site is consistent with the General Plan (with approval of GPA No. 21008 ); all proposed parcels meet the development standards of the A-1 (Light Agriculture) zone.

Page | 23

D. That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.

The 19.36-acre site is physically suitable undeveloped, vacant lot that is adjacent to other residential land uses. The site is physically suitable to accommodate the residential subdivision as there is adequate water and sewer connections and public services are available to the site.

E. That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.

The project is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development in that it proposes 31 single-family residential dwelling units at a density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre, which is below the maximum allowable density under the proposed Country Neighborhood (LDR) General Plan designation.

F. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the project has been reviewed against environmental regulations and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared to ensure mitigation of any impacts to the environment to a level of less than significant or avoided all together.

G. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems.

An Initial Study was prepared that evaluated potential effects with respect to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities and Service Systems. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared that evaluated potential effects with respect to Hazards and Hazardous Materials and Land Use and Planning. The Initial Study and EIR determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will not cause serious public health problems.

H. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.

Page | 24

The project has been designed to not conflict with any easements and does not incorporate any barriers to access or use of the property within the proposed land division.

VI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
An Initial Study was prepared that evaluated potential effects with respect to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreati on, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities and Service Systems. Based on the Initial Study, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared that evaluated potential effects with respect to Hazards and Hazardous Materials and Land Use and Planning.

The f ollowing provides a summary of the proposed Project's environmental impacts, as required by CEQA Guidelines § 15123(a). After the application of all feasible mitigation measures (MMs), Plans, Policies, and Programs (PPPs), and Project Design Features (PDFs ), the Project would result in the following unavoidable environmental effects:
• Hazards: No feasible mitigation is available to eliminate the identified inconsistency of the Project with the Flabob ALUP, so potential impacts related to airport safety are significant and unavoidable on both a direct and cumulative basis, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this impact will be required if the Project is approved.
• Land Use and Planning: There is no feasible mitigation available related to the Project's inconsistencies with various General Plan policies regarding land use (inconsistent with Flabob ALUP). Therefore, potential impacts of the Project related to consistency with City General Plan policies for the Flabob ALUP are significant and unavoidable on both a direct and cumulative basis, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this impact will be required if the Project is approved.

Public Review Period. The public comment period for the Draft EIR began on September 29, 2023 and ended on November 13, 20 23. No comments were received.

At its December 13, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify and adopt the EIR , Findings with Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for this project.

Page | 25

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
A public hearing notice w as sent to surrounding property owners within 1,000 feet from the boundaries of the project site. Additionally, legal advertisements were published in the Press Enterprise on Sunday February 4, 2024.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The applicant will cover the cost of processing this application. No additional cost to the City is anticipated

CONCLUSION
The Project adheres to the applicable goals and policies within the General Plan and is consistent with the requirements in the City's zoning code (with approval of the GPA and overruling of ALUC's inconsistency decision). The Project introduces a high quality , low- density large lot traditional neighborhood housing type similar to housing types in vicinity.

The project includes next generation living spaces that include flexible rooms to serve the needs of multiple generations of family members and diverse lifestyles (e.g., rooms can serve as office, gym, or game room)
The Project's attractive Farmhouse and Mission architecture, traditional neighborhood streetscape and landscaping, and enhanced entryways and overall site improvements makes this development a showcase project.

In addition, the project provides the following benefits:
• Activates vacant property with large lots and single-story homes that will eliminate public nuisance and safety issues (e.g., illegal dumping, fires, homelessness) and blend with community.
• New residents to support local businesses
• Large lots allow for animal keeping and accommodation of animal trailers • Provides new equestrian trail along Riverview Drive
• Supports City Housing goals by providing new housing and complying with Inclusionary Housing Ordinance

ALTERNATIVES

1. Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024- 05; and Resolution No. 2024-06 to do the following:
a. Certifying an Environmental Impact Report, making Findings of Fact, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
b. Approve MA21256 (General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21008, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38171), and Overriding the Airport Land Use Commission’s Finding of Inconsistency subject to the conditions of approval.

Page | 27

3. Project Plans (Architectural Plans, Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan, Landscaping Plans)

4. Draft Environmental Impact Report
a) Direct link:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/View/3049/DEIR_Sad dlehorn-Residential-Project_Public-Review-Copy_9-29-23
b) Appendices available on the City’s website page under Development Services/Planning/Environmental Reports at “MA21269 The District at Jurupa Valley”:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/Index/68

5. Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)

6. Excerpt of August 11, 2021 Planning Commission minutes

7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-18 (without attachments)

8. Excerpt of December 13, 2023 Planning Commission minutes

9. October 14, 2021 Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Development Review Staff report

10. October 18, 2021 ALUC Determination Letter

11. Allen Aviation Aeronautical Obstruction Evaluation Study

12. December 28, 2023 City 45-day ALUC Overrule Notification Letters (without attachment)

13. January 10, 2024 ALUC Overrule Notification Response Letter

14. January 17, 2024 Caltrans Overrule Notification Response Letter

15. 1,000 Foot Radius Map with Extended Areas

16. Public Comments

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING AN

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, MAKING

FINDINGS, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF

OVERRIDING CONSIDERA TIONS AND A MITIGATION

MONITORING AND REPOR TING PROGRAM FOR MA
21256 WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 21008 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 38171, AND

AN OVERRIDING OF THE AIRPORT LAND USE
COMMISSION’S FINDING OF INCONSISTENCY TO
PERMIT THE SUBDIVISI ON OF APPROXIMATELY 19.36
GROSS ACRES INTO 31 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6550 LIMONITE AVENUE
(SADDLEHORN RANCH)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project.
(a) RC Hobbs Company ( the “Applicant”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21008 and Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 (collectively, Master Application No. 21256) to permit the subdivision of 19.36 acres into 31 lots on property located at 6550 Limonite Avenue (APN: 186 -160-021), along with the construction of site improvements such as landscaping, parking, and infrastructure facilities (the “Project”). The Project approval also requires the overriding of the Airport Land Use Commission’s finding of inconsistency.

Section 2. Procedural Findings.
(a) The application for the Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act.
(b) On December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly-noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted PC Resolution No. 2023-23 recommending that the City Council approve the Project. (c) On February 15, 2024, the City Council of the City of Jurupa held a duly- noticed public hearing on the Project , at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity to and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. -2-

Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley make s the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the proposed Project:
(a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the proposed Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for reviewing, considering, and po tentially approving the proposed Project.
(b) The City determined that an environmental impact report (EIR) would be required for the proposed Project and issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) on June 29, 2022. The NOP was sent to the S tate Clearinghouse (SCH #2022060680), responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties and posted on the City's website for a thirty (30)-day public review period from June 29, 2022 to July 28, 2022 . The purpose of the NOP was to receive comments and input from interested public agencies and private parties on issues to be addressed in the EIR for the proposed Project.
(c) An Initial Study pursuant to 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15063(c)(3) was prepared to assist in the preparation of this EIR by: focusing the EIR on the effec ts determined to be significant; identifying the effects determined not to be significant; and explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant. Based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study, whic h is attached to this EIR as Appendix A -1, Initial Study Checklist, several environmental impacts were screened out and did not require discussion in the EIR.
(d) Thereafter, the City contracted for the independent preparation of a Draft EIR for the proposed Project, including preparation and review, as applicable, of all necessary technical studies and reports in support of the Draft EIR. In accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City analyzed the proposed Project's potential impacts on the envir onment, potential mitigation, and potential alternatives to the proposed Project. (e) Upon completion of the Draft EIR on September 29, 2023, the City initiated a public comment period by preparing and sending a Notice of Availability (“NOA”) to all responsible agencies, trustee agencies, the Riverside County Clerk, other interested parties, and organizations and individuals who had previously requested the NOA to inform recipients that the Draft EIR was available for a forty -five (45)-day public review period beginning September 29, 2023 and ending on November 13, 2023. The NOA also was published in The Press Enterprise. (f) The City also sent a Notice of Completion (“NOC”) and copies of the Draft EIR to the California Office of Planning and Research, State Clear inghouse, on September 29, 2023.
(g) Copies of the Draft EIR were sent to various public agencies, as well as to organizations and individuals requesting copies. In addition, copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at t he Jurupa Valley City Hall and two Jurupa Valley Public Library facilities (Glen Avon Library, and Louis Rubidoux Library). The Draft EIR was -3-

also made available for download via the City's website: http://www.jurupavalley.org. No comments on the Draft EIR were received.
(h) The Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR and all of its appendices . The Final EIR was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies at least 10 days prior to certification of the Final EIR, in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21092.5(a). (i) Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before approving a project for which an EIR is required, make one or more of the following written finding(s) for each significant effect identified in the EIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding:
1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR; or,
2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or, 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (j) These required written findings are set forth in Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
(k) CEQA G uidelines Section 15093 requires that if a project will cause significant unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any si gnificant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. The Statement of Overriding Considerations is included in the findings as part of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and is incorpor ated herein by reference as if set forth in full, and is hereby adopted. (l) CEQA Section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “B”, and is herein incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, and is hereby adopted. (m) Prior to taking action on this Resolution, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, including any comments on the EIR, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony presented during the public hearings on the proposed Project. (n) Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley is the custodian of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of -4-

proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California, 92509.

Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act Substantive Findings .

The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California does hereby:
(a) Declare that the above Procedural Findings are true and correct, and hereby incorporate them herein by this reference.
(b) Find that agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR and the proposed Project. (c) Find and declare that the City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final EIR, staff reports , all appendices to the Dr aft EIR and technical reports supporting the analysis, and all testimony related to environmental issues regarding the proposed Project. (d) Find and determine that the Final EIR fully analyzes and discloses the potential impacts of the proposed Project, and t hat those impacts have been mitigated or avoided to the extent feasible for the reasons set forth in the Findings attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference, with the exception of those impacts found to be significant and unmitigable as discussed therein.
(e) Find and declare that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. The City Council further finds that the additional information provided in the staff reports and the evidence presented in written and oral testim ony does not constitute new information requiring recirculation of the EIR under CEQA. None of the information presented has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial environmental impact of the proposed Project or a fe asible mitigation measure or alternative that the City has declined to implement.
(f) The City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR as being in compliance with CEQA, adopts the Findings pursuant to CEQA and the Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit “A”, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached as Exhibit “B.” The City Council further determines that all of the findings made in this Resolution are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Final EIR and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearing before the Planning Commission, and in the record of the proceedings. The City Council further finds that each of the overriding benefits stated in Exhibit “A” by itself, would individually justify proceeding with the proposed Project despite any significant unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR or alleged in the record of proceedings. (g) The City Council hereby imposes as a condition on the Project each mitigation measure specified in Exhibit “B,” and directs City staff to implement and to monitor the mitigation measures as described in Exhibit “B.”
(h) The City Council directs staff to file a Notice of Determination as set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21152.
-5-

Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of February 2024.

______________________________
Guillermo Silva
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-6-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 202 4-05 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 1 5th day of February 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of February 2024.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

Exhibit A

Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations

EXHIBIT A

Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the:

Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project

State Clearinghouse No. 2022060680

Lead Agency
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Project Applicant
R.C. Hobbs

February 2024

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 2

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (the “City Council”) in approving the Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project (the “Project”) makes the Findings described below. The Findings are based upon the entire record before the City Council, as described in Subsection 1.3 below, including the Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) prepared for the Project with the City of Jurupa Valley (the “City”) acting as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).

The Notice of Preparation, Notice of Availability, Draft EIR, Technical Studies, and Final EIR will be referred to collectively herein as the “EIR” unless otherwise specified.

1.1 FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA
Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21002 provides that “public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]” The statute also provides that the procedures required by CEQA are “intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation mea sures which will avoid or lessen such significant effects.” Finally, Section 21002 indicates that “in the event [that] specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof.”

The mandate described in PRC Section 21002 is implemented, in part, through the requirement that agencies must adopt findings before approving projects for which EIRs are required. For each significant environmental effect identified in an EIR for a project, the approving agency must issue a written finding reaching one or more of three permissible conclusions. The first such finding is that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. The second finding is that such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. The third finding is that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR. (CEQA Guidelines, §15091.) PRC Section 21061.1 defines “feasible” to mean “capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, legal, and technological factors.”

1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY

1.2.1 SITE LOCATION
The Project is located in the City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County, California. More specifically, the Project is located at 6550 Limonite Avenue (APN: 186-160 -021) on approximately 19.36 gross acres (18.56 net acres) south of Limonite Frontage Road and Riverview Drive to the south.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 3

1.2.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Project is proposing to construct a 19.36-acre subdivision consisting of 31 single -family lots or

1.6 dwelling units per acre. The Project includes landscaping; internal paving and walkways; and a bioretention basin.

The principal discretionary actions required of the City of Jurupa Valley to implement the Project include: General Plan Amendment No. 21008 and Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 (collectively, Master Application No. 21256). The Project approval also requires the overriding of the Airport Land Use Commission’s (“ALUC”) finding of inconsistency.

1.2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The underlying purpose of the Project is to develop a vacant, undeveloped, and under -utilized site in an area of the City with predominantly residential uses with a residential development. The following is a list of specific objectives that the Project is intended to achieve:

• Assist the City in meeting its housing goals and reflect anticipated market needs and public demand, by providing a diverse range of home types with the intent to blend into the City of Jurupa Valley’s rural character.

• Develop a vacant residential property with close proximity to SR-60 that is readily accessible to existing and available infrastructure, including roads and utilities.

1.2.4 CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ACTIONS COVERED BY THE EIR
The following discretionary and administrative actions are required of the City to implement the Project. The EIR prepared for the Project covers all discretionary and administrative approvals which may be needed to construct or implement the Project, whether or not they are explicitly listed below.

• Approve General Plan Amendment No. 21008
• Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 38171
• Override ALUC finding of inconsistency

1.2.5 APPROVALS FROM OTHER AGENCIES
PRC Section 21104 requires that all EIRs be reviewed by responsible and trustee agencies (see also CEQA Guidelines Section 15082 and Section 15086(a)). As defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15381, “the term ‘Responsible Agency’ includes all public agencies other than the Lead Agency that have discretionary approval power over the project.” A “Trustee Agency” is defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15386 as “a state agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a project which are held in trust for the people of the State of California.”

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 4
The agencies expected to use the EIR are described below. However, the EIR can be used by any Trustee Agency or Responsible Agency, whether identified in the EIR or not, as part of its decision- making processes in relation to the proposed Project.

Agency Action
Responsible Agencies
Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board
(RWQCB)
Santa Ana RWQCB is responsible for the protection of California’s water resources and water quality. The Santa Ana RWQCB is responsible for issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit, issuance of Construction General Permit Coverage and issuance of Commercial General Permit Coverage.

1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The City conducted an environmental review of the Project to ensure that the City’s decision makers and the public are fully informed about the potential significant environmental effects of the Project; to identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced; and to prevent significant, avoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in the Project using mitigation measures which have been found to be feasible . To do this, the City, acting as lead agency under CEQA, undertook the following:

• Determined that an EIR would be required for the proposed Project and issued a Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) on June 29, 2022. The NOP was sent to the State Clearinghouse (SCH #2022060680), responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and interested parties and posted on the City’s website for a thirty (30)-day public review period from June 29, 2022 to July 28, 2022.

The purpose of the NOP was to receive comments and input from interested public agencies and private parties on issues to be addressed in the EIR for the proposed Project.

• Prepared an Initial Study pursuant to 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15063(c)(3) to assist in the preparation of this EIR by: focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant; identifying the effects determined not to be significant; and explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant. Based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study, several environmental impacts were screened out and did not require discussion in the EIR.

• Prepared a Draft EIR for the Project, including preparation and review, as applicable, of all necessary technical studies and reports in support of the Draft EIR.

• Initiated a public comment period on September 29, 2023, by preparing and sending a Notice of Availability (“NOA”) to all responsible agencies, trustee agencies, the Riverside County Clerk, other interested parties, and organizations and individuals who had previously requested the NOA to inform recipients that the Draft EIR was available for a forty-five (45)-day public review period beginning September 29, 2023 and ending on November 13, 2023.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 5
• Published the NOA in The Press Enterprise.

• Sent a Notice of Completion (“NOC”) and copies of the Draft EIR to the California Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, on September 29, 2023.

• Sent co pies of the Draft EIR to various public agencies, as well as to organizations and individuals requesting copies.
• Made available copies of the documents for public review and inspection at the Jurupa Valley City Hall and two Jurupa Valley Public Library facilities (Glen Avon Library, and Louis Rubidoux Library).
• Made available the Draft EIR for download via the City’s website:
http://www.jurupavalley.org.
• Held a Planning Commission hearing on December 13, 2023. • Held a City Council hearing on February 15, 2024.

All the documents identified above and all the documents which are required to be part of the record pursuant to PRC §21167.6(e) are on file with the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Division located at 8930 Limonite Avenue in Jurupa Valley, CA 92509. Questions should be directed to Thomas Gorham, Principal Planner.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 6

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND FINDINGS
The EIR was prepared under the supervision and direction of the Planning staff of the City’s Planning Division. The thorough review of the Draft EIR (DEIR) and Final EIR (FEIR) by City staff, and the review and careful consideration of the Final EIR by the City Council conclusively show that the Final EIR is the product of and reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City as the Lead Agency.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3), although an Initial Study was not required because the City determined that an EIR would be prepared, the Initial Study was prepared to assist in the preparation of the EIR by:
• Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant. • Identifying the effects determined not to be significant. • Explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant.

Based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study, which is attached to the EIR as Appendix A -1, Initial Study Checklist, the following environmental impacts were screened out and were not discussed in the EIR:

Aesthetics. Potential to:
• Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista.
• Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rocks, outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway.
• In a non-urbanized area, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings.
• Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect the day or nighttime views in the area.

Agriculture and Forestry Resources. Potential to:
• Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. • Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned “Timberland Production.”
• Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non- forest use.

Air Quality. Potential to:
• Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 7
• Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

Biological Resources. Potential to:
• Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
• Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service.
• Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means.
• Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.
• Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.
• Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

Cultural Resources. Potential to:
• Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5.
• Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5.
• Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.

Energy. Potential to:
• Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. • Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Geology and Soils. Potential to:
• Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 8
• Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking, seismic -related ground failure (including liquefaction, or landslides).
• Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. • Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable because of the Project, and potentially result in on-site or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse.
• Be located on expansive soil, as defined in the Uniform Building Code, creating substantial risks to life or property.
• Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving landslides.
• Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. • Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Potential to:
• Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.
• Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Potential to:
• Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.
• Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
• Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. • Be located on a site, which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.
• Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
• Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires.

Hydrology and Water Quality. Potential to:
• Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 9
• Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. • Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would:
o Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. o Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite.
o Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
o Impede or redirect flood flows.
o In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation.
• Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.

Land Use and Planning. Potential to:
• Physically divide an established community.

Mineral Resources. Potential to:
• Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and to the residents of the state.
• Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan.

Noise. Potential to:
• Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.
• Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. • For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

Population and Housing. Potential to:
• Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure.
• Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 10
Public Services. Potential to:
• Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts for fire protection, police protection, schools, parks , or other public facilities.

Recreation. Potential to:
• Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. • Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.

Transportation. Potential to:
• Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.
• Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). • Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). • Result in inadequate emergency access.

Tribal Cultural Resources. Potential to:
• Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). • A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Utilities and Service Systems. Potential to:
• Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. • Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple years.
• Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments.
• Generate solid waste more than State or local standards, or more than the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. • Conflict with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 11
Wildfire. The Project is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones as such, an analysis of wildfire impacts was not required.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 12

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF LESS-THAN-

SIGNIFICANT
The following topics were determined through the Initial Study not to require analysis in the EIR, with the inclusion of Mitigation Measures as follows:

3.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

3.1.1 THRESHOLD 4.4(A)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

 Findings
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

 Substantial Evidence
The topography of the Project site is moderately sloping land from the southwestern to northeastern portion of the project site with elevations on the site ranging from approximately 897 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 783 feet above MSL. Land use in t he surrounding area varies between estate residential, rural residential, single family residential, and a Thoroughbred Farm. The vegetation community within the Project impact is characterized as California Annual Grassland Alliance.

Previous and current anthropogenic activities and invasion of nonnative plant species have contributed to the disturbed condition of many vegetation communities within the project vicinity.

The Project Site is located within the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Jurupa Area Plan. The site is not located within a MSHCP Core, Criteria Cell, Subunit, or Linkage. The project site is not located within identified Survey Areas incl uding: MSHCP Narrow Endemic Plant, Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly, and Burrowing Owl Survey Areas.

There are no sensitive plant species in the project area, and none were observed on the Project site.

There are no MSHCP Section 6.3.2 Criteria Area Species surveys required for the Project site. No sensitive wildlife was detected within the Project study area during wildlife field studies.

No non-MSHCP covered special status wildlife species were observed on the Project site. Impacts to non-MSHCP covered special status wildlife species would not be considered significant with the implementation of the minimization measure listed below for nesting and/or migratory bird species.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 13

MM BIO-1 Nesting Bird Survey and Protection. To maintain compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513, site preparation activities (such as ground disturbance, construction activities, and/or removal of trees and vegetation) should be conducted, to the greatest extent possible, outside of the nesting season. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading.

The survey area will include the project impact footprint and a 500-foot buffer where legal access is granted around the disturbance footprint. Within 72 hours of the nesting bird survey, all areas surveyed by the biologist will be cleared by the Contract or or a supplemental nesting bird survey is required. The survey results shall be provided to the City’s Community Development Department. The Project Applicant shall adhere to the following:

1. Applicant shall designate a biologist (Designated Biologist) experienced in:
identifying local and migratory bird species of special concern; conducting bird surveys using appropriate survey methodology; nesting surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding territories, and identifying nesting stages and nest success; determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures.

2. Pre-activity field surveys shall be conducted at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions, no more than 3 days prior to the initiation of Project activities. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate.

If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If active nests or nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are identified during the nesting bird survey, avoidance buffers shall be implemented a s determined by a qualified biologist and approved by the City of Jurupa Valley, based on their best professional judgement and experience. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the Project biologist determines the young have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The buffer shall be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the nesting bird by accounting for topography, ambient conditions, species, nest location, and activity type. All nests shall be monitored as determined by the qualified biologist until nestlings have fledged and

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 14
dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The Designated Biologist shall monitor the nest at the onset of project activities, and at the onset of any changes in such project activities (e.g., increase in number or type of equipment, change in equipment usage, etc.) to determine the efficacy of the buffer.

The qualified biologist shall halt all construction activities within proximity to an active nest if it is determined that the activities are harassing the nest and may result in nest abandonment or take. The qualified biologist shall also have the authority to require implementation of avoidance measures related to noise, vibration, or light pollution if indirect impacts are resulting in harassment of the nest. Work can resume within these avoidance areas when no other active nests are found. Upon completion of the survey and nesting bird monitoring, a report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping.

Implementation of this Mitigation Measure will ensure that if construction occurs during a nesting seasons, appropriate steps are taken to survey the area and avoid impacts to nests. With inclusion of this Mitigation Measure, impacts are less than significant.

3.1.2 THRESHOLD 4.4(B)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?

 Findings
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

 Substantial Evidence
Jurisdictional wetland and non-wetland waters of the U.S. and riparian and streambed waters of the State are present within the Project site, these areas are within the Avoided Area only of the Project site. Additionally, riparian/riverine resources subject to the MSHCP are present on the Project site also within the Avoided Area only. No evidence of vernal pools or seasonal depressions were observed within the Project Site and no suitable habitat for fairy shrimp is present within or adjacent to the Project Site.

The USFWS’s Information for Planning and Consultation online service for information regarding Threatened and Endangered Species Final Critical Habitat designation within California was reviewed to determine if the Project site occurs within any species’ designated Critical Habitat. No Critical Habitat exists within the Project site. The nearest Critical Habitats are as follows: least Bell’s vireo

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 15
(Vireo bellii pusillus) habitat approximately 0.15 miles and Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaaneae) habitat approximately 0.25 miles both directly south of the Project site.

Although suitable habitat (riparian scrub, forest, or woodlands) for the least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) or western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) was detected adjacent to the Project Site these areas are in the Avoided Area and PPP 4.4-1 and Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is required.

MM BIO-1 Nesting Bird Survey and Protection. To maintain compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513, site preparation activities (such as ground disturbance, construction activities, and/or removal of trees and vegetation) should be conducted, to the greatest extent possible, outside of the nesting season. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading.

The survey area will include the project impact footprint and a 500-foot buffer where legal access is granted around the disturbance footprint. Within 72 hours of the nesting bird survey, all areas surveyed by the biologist will be cleared by the Contract or or a supplemental nesting bird survey is required. The survey results shall be provided to the City’s Community Development Department. The Project Applicant shall adhere to the following:

1. Applicant shall designate a biologist (Designated Biologist) experienced in:
identifying local and migratory bird species of special concern; conducting bird surveys using appropriate survey methodology; nesting surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding territories, and identifying nesting stages and nest success; determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures.

2. Pre-activity field surveys shall be conducted at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions, no more than 3 days prior to the initiation of Project activities. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate.

If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If active nests or nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are identified during the nesting bird survey, avoidance buffers shall be implemented as determined by a qualified biologist and approved by the City of Jurupa Valley, based

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 16
on their best professional judgement and experience. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the Project biologist determines the young have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The buffer shall be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the nesting bird by accounting for topography, ambient conditions, species, nest location, and activity type. All nests shall be monitored as determined by the qualified biologist until nestlings have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The Designated Biologist shall monitor the nest at the onset of project activities, and at the onset of any changes in such project activities (e.g., increase in number or type of equipment, change in equipment usage, etc.) to determine the efficacy of the buffer.

The qualified biologist shall halt all construction activities within proximity to an active nest if it is determined that the activities are harassing the nes t and may result in nest abandonment or take. The qualified biologist shall also have the authority to require implementation of avoidance measures related to noise, vibration, or light pollution if indirect impacts are resulting in harassment of the nest. Work can resume within these avoidance areas when no other active nests are found. Upon completion of the survey and nesting bird monitoring, a report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping.

Implementation of this Mitigation Measure will ensure that if construction occurs during a nesting seasons, appropriate steps are taken to survey the area and avoid impacts to nests. With inclusion of this Mitigation Measure, impacts are less than significant.

3.1.3 THRESHOLD 4.4(D)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?

 Findings
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

 Substantial Evidence
Wildlife corridors link together areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. Corridors effectively act as links between different populations of a species. The Project site area proposed for development does not represent a wildlife travel route, crossing, or regional movement corridor between large open space habitats. The Project site is bordered by existing roads, and residential development. As such, the Project will not interfere

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 17
substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors.

The site supports nesting opportunities for common migratory bird species. All migratory bird species, whether listed or not, also receive protection under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 .

The MBTA prohibits individuals to kill, take, possess, or sell any migratory bird, bird parts (including nests and eggs) except per regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Department (16 U. S. Code 7034).

Therefore, if vegetation is to be removed during the nesting season, a pre‐construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted, and avoidance measures taken to ensure that no take of birds or their nests will occur per Mitigation Measure BIO-1.

MM BIO-1 Nesting Bird Survey and Protection. To maintain compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513, site preparation activities (such as ground disturbance, construction activities, and/or removal of trees and vegetation) should be conducted, to the greatest extent possible, outside of the nesting season. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading.

The survey area will include the project impact footprint and a 500-foot buffer where legal access is granted around the disturbance footprint. Within 72 hours of the nesting bird survey, all areas surveyed by the biologist will be cleared by the Contract or or a supplemental nesting bird survey is required. The survey results shall be provided to the City’s Community Development Department. The Project Applicant shall adhere to the following:

1. Applicant shall designate a biologist (Designated Biologist) experienced in:
identifying local and migratory bird species of special concern; conducting bird surveys using appropriate survey methodology; nesting surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding territories, and identifying nesting stages and nest success; determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures.

2. Pre-activity field surveys shall be conducted at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions, no more than 3 days prior to the initiation of Project activities. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 18

If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If active nests or nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are identified during the nesting bird survey, avoidance buffers shall be implemented as determined by a qualified biologist and approved by the City of Jurupa Valley, based on their best professional judgement and experience. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the Project biologist determines the young have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The buffer shall be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the nesting bird by accounting for topography, ambient conditions, species, nest location, and activity type. All nests shall be monitored as determined by the qualified biologist until nestlings have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The Designated Biologist shall monitor the nest at the onset of project activities, and at the onset of any changes in such project activities (e.g., increase in number or type of equipment, change in equipment usage, etc.) to determine the efficacy of the buffer.

The qualified biologist shall halt all construction activities within proximity to an active nest if it is determined that the activities are harassing the nest and may result in nest abandonment or take. The qualified biologist shall also have the authority to require implementation of avoidance measures related to noise, vibration, or light pollution if indirect impacts are resulting in harassment of the nest. Work can resume within these avoidance areas when no other active nests are found. Upon completion of the survey and nesting bird monitoring, a report shall be prepare d and submitted to the City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping.

Implementation of this Mitigation Measure will ensure that if construction occurs during a nesting seasons, appropriate steps are taken to survey the area and avoid impacts to nests. With inclusion of this Mitigation Measure, impacts are less than significant.

3.1.4 THRESHOLD 4.4(F)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project c onflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?

 Findings
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 19
 Substantial Evidence
The Project site is located within the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. The plan provides coverage (including take authorization for listed species) for special‐status plant and animal species, as well as mitigation for impacts to sensitive species. With implementation of PPP 4.4-1 and Mitigation Measure BIO -1, impacts related to conflicts with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan are less than significant because the Project will take steps to avoid impacts on nesting birds, should they be discovered in the area during construction.

MM BIO-1 Nesting Bird Survey and Protection. To maintain compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513, site preparation activities (such as ground disturbance, construction activities, and/or removal of trees and vegetation) should be conducted, to the greatest extent possible, outside of the nesting season. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading.

The survey area will include the project impact footprint and a 500-foot buffer where legal access is granted around the disturbance footprint. Within 72 hours of the nesting bird survey, all areas surveyed by the biologist will be cleared by the Contractor or a supplemental nesting bird survey is required. The survey results shall be provided to the City’s Community Development Department. The Project Applicant shall adhere to the following:

1. Applicant shall designate a biologist (Designated Biologist) experienced in:
identifying local and migratory bird species of special concern; conducting bird surveys using appropriate survey methodology; nesting surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding territories, and identifying nesting stages and nest success; determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures.

2. Pre-activity field surveys shall be conducted at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions, no more than 3 days prior to the initiation of Project activities. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate.

If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If active nests or nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 20
identified during the nesting bird survey, avoidance buffers shall be implemented as determined by a qualified biologist and approved by the City of Jurupa Valley, based on their best professional judgement and experience. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the Project biologist determines the young have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The buffer shall be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the nesting bird by accounting for topography, ambient conditions, species, nest location, and activity type. All nests shall be monitored as determined by the qualified biologist until nestlings have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The Designated Biologist shall monitor the nest at the onset of project activities, and at the onset of any changes in such project activities (e.g., increase in number or type of equipment, change in equipment usage, etc.) to determine the efficacy of t he buffer.

The qualified biologist shall halt all construction activities within proximity to an active nest if it is determined that the activities are harassing the nest and may result in nest abandonment or take. The qualified biologist shall also have the authority to require implementation of avoidance measures related to noise, vibration, or light pollution if indirect impacts are resulting in harassment of the nest. Work can resume within these avoidance areas when no other active nests are found. Upon completion of the survey and nesting bird monitoring, a report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping.

Implementation of this Mitigation Measure will ensure that if construction occurs during a nesting seasons, appropriate steps are taken to survey the area and avoid impacts to nests. With inclusion of this Mitigation Measure, impacts are less than significant.

3.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES

3.2.1 THRESHOLD 4.5(B)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project c ause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5?

 Findings
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-3, which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

 Substantial Evidence
Archaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with former human activities, and may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool manufacture, tool concentrations, and/or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains. Previous findings cited in the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment relating to the archaeological setting determined that no

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 21
significant archaeological or cultural resources were identified during the research and site survey.

Four previous surveys were completed on the site Tang et al. (2005); Dice (2009); Kraft and Smith (2014 and 2016) and also failed to result in any discoveries.

A standard archaeological records check was completed through the University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center. This research was designed to compile data on previous studies, the identification of nearby architectural resources, and to place the Project site in a context for assessing the sensitivity of the Project site to yield evidence of archaeological resources.

The recent research identified the Project site as having a low level of sensitivity for prehistoric archaeological resources, a low to moderate level of sensitivity for evidence of historic archaeological resources, and a moderate to high paleontological resources. The intensive survey of the property failed to yield any evidence of prehistoric or historic archaeological resources. While there is always a potential for buried resources, the potential is relatively low and, with no evidence of bedrock outcroppings and the extensive farming conducted over decades, it is unlikely buried resources will be identified within the Project site. However, since the area is still considered slightly sensitive (resources have been recorded within one mile), should any evidence of prehistoric archaeological resources be encountered during grading activities, the following mitigation measures are required:

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following notes shall be placed on the grading plan:
findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department and the Eastern Information Center.

MM CR-1 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Permit Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department that a qualified professional archaeologist (Professional Archaeologist) that is listed on the City of Jurupa Valley Cultural Resources Consultant List or the Cultural Resource Consultant List maintained by the County of Riverside Planning Department, has been contracted to implement Archaeological Monitoring for the area of impact for the Project.

Monitoring shall be conducted in coordination with the Consulting Tribe(s), defined as a Tribe that initiated the tribal consultation process for the Project as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b) (“AB52”) and has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City. Monitoring shall address the details of all ground-disturbing activities and provides procedures that must be followed to avoid or reduce potential impacts on cultural, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources to a level that is less than significant.

A fully executed copy of the Archaeological Monitoring Agreement shall be provided to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department to ensure compliance with this measure. If the resource is significant, Mitigation Measure CR‐2 shall apply.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 22
MM CR-2 The Project Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a treatment plan to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall be per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code § 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementing archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource and subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.

If historic Native American tribal cultural resources are involved, the Treatment Plan shall be coordinated with the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through TCR-3 of the Initial Study for MA21256.

MM CR-3 A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the Project Archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department and the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside. If a historic tribal cultural resource is involved, a copy shall be provided to the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through 3 of the Initial Study for MA21256.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure s CR-1 through CR-3 would ensure that in the event of an unanticipated discovery of archaeological resources on the Project, impacts on archeological resources would be less than significant.

3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

3.3.1 THRESHOLD 4.7(F)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?

 Findings
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO -2, which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

 Substantial Evidence
General Plan Figure 4-18- Paleontological Sensitivity, indicates that the site has a high sensitivity (Ha) designation for finding paleontological resources. As part of the Phase I Cultural Investigation, a paleontological overview was prepared by Dr. Samuel McLeod of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. This overview included a review of applicable literature, geologic maps, and the identification of local resources known to the Museum and concluded that the rated sensitivity for Paleontological Resources was Moderate to High.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 23
McLeod (2020) indicated that excavations in the exposed igneous rocks will not uncover any recognizable fossils, shallow excavations into older Quaternary Alluvium may not encounter significant vertebrate fossils, however deeper excavations may encounter fossil vertebrates. Therefore, the following mitigation measures are required to ensure that impacts to paleontological resources are less than signifcant.

MM-GEO-1: Archaeological Inadvertent Discovery. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified Archaeologist shall be retained to conduct monitoring as necessary during ground-disturbing activities such as vegetation removal, grading, and other excavations related to the project. The Archaeologist shall be present at the pre -grade conference and shall establish a schedule for archaeological resource surveillance based on the nature of planned activities. The Archaeologist shall establish, in cooperation with the lead agency, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work, if any is ongoing, to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of cultural resources as appropriate. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant, the Archaeological Monitor shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the lead agency, for exploration and/or salvage. Significant sites that cannot be avoided will require data recovery measures and shall be completed upon approval of a Dat a Recovery Plan.

MM-GEO-2: Archaeological Treatment Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre -grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (below 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should also be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level.

In the event of an unanticipated discovery, implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO- 2 would ensure that impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant.

3.4 NOISE

3.4.1 THRESHOLD 4.13(A)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 24
 Findings
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measure NOI-1 which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

 Substantial Evidence
The primary source of noise in the area is from vehicle traffic from Limonite Avenue. As part of the Noise Impact Study 24-hour ambient noise measurements were taken on the Project site near Limonite Frontage Road and Riverview Drive with 24-Hour CNEL meas urements of 64.8 dBA and 57.5 dBA respectively.

The City’s criteria for determining if construction noise results in a significant CEQA impact is as follows:

1) The project is inconsistent with General Plan Policy NE 3.5: Construction Noise which states:
“Limit commercial construction activities adjacent to or within 200 feet of residential uses to weekdays, between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., and limit high-noise -generating construction activities (e.g., grading, demolition, pile driving) near sensitive receptors to weekdays between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.”

Portions of the Project site are located within 50-feet of the nearest residential uses located to the east of the Project site. Therefore, the Project contractors must limit construction activities during the days and times required by Mitigation Measure NOI-1.

2) Construction noise levels exceed the levels identified in the latest version of the Federal Transit Administration Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.

Construction noise will have a temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise level above the existing within the Project vicinity. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Noise levels will be loudest during the site preparation phase.

The construction noise levels are expected to range from 73.7 to 88.2 dBA at 50- feet. To reduce construction impacts to the residential uses adjacent to the project site to the maximum extent feasible, the following mitigation measure is required.

MM NOI-1 Construction Noise Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following notes shall be included on grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 25
These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors.
“a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the months of October through May.
b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site. d) Construction equipment staging areas shall be located the greatest distance between the staging area and the nearest sensitive receptors.”

The implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 will ensure that any temporary noise impacts resulting from Project construction are less than significant.

3.5 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

3.5.1 THRESHOLD 4.18(B)
Impact Assessment: Would the P roject cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

 Finding
The Project is required to comply with Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through TCR-3 which would reduce impacts to less than significant. The City Council has determined that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Initial Study.

 Substantial Evidence
Assembly Bill (AB) 52 created a process for consultation with California Native American Tribes in the CEQA process. Tribal Governments can request consultation with a lead agency and give input into potential impacts to tribal cultural resources before the agency decides what kind of environmental assessment is appropriate for a proposed project.

Native American scoping, pursuant to the requirements of AB 52, was initiated by a request of the Native American Heritage Commission for a Sacred Lands File search and AB 52 contacts list on

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 26
September 7, 2018. The NAHC responded by letter on September 24, 2018. The NAHC has no evidence that sacred lands are present on the Project site.

The Planning Department notified the following California Native American Tribes per the requirements of AB52:

• Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation
• Soboba Band Luiseño Indians
• San Manuel Band of Mission Indians

As a result of the AB52 consultation process, and to ensure that potential impacts to any tribal cultural resources that are discovered are less than significant, the following mitigation measures are required:

MM TCR-1 Native American Monitoring Agreement: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Permit Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with the Consulting Tribe(s) for Native American Monitor(s) to be onsite during ground disturbing activities allowed by the grading permit. A Consulting Tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b). Ground disturbing activities include excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbi ng, tree removals, grading, and trenching.

The Monitoring Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, the following provisions:

a) Provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice to the Consulting Tribe(s) of all ground disturbing activities.
b) In conjunction with the Archaeological Monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measure MM -CR 1 under Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, of the Initial Study for MA21256, the Native American Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources. c) The onsite monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Native American Tribal Monitor(s) have indicated that all upcoming ground disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.

The Project Proponent shall submit a fully executed copy of the Monitoring Agreement to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this mitigation measure. If there are multiple Consulting Tribes involved, a separate Monitoring Agreement is required for each. The Monitoring Agreement shall not modify any condition of approval or mitigation measure.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 27

MM TCR-2 Unanticipated Discovery: The Permit Applicant or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of the grading permit. If, during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed:

a) Ground disturbing activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. Ground disturbing activities are allowed on the remainder of the Project Site.

b) In the event the unanticipated discovery includes human remains and/or cremations no photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with written approval by the Consulting Tribes(s).

c) The Consulting Tribe(s), the Project Archaeologist (retained by the Permit Applicant under Mitigation Measure MM -CR-1, Retain Professional Archaeologist), of this Initial Study document for MA21256, and the City of Jurupa Valley Community Develo pment Department shall meet and confer, and discuss the find with respect to the following:

1. Determine if the resource is a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined by Public Resources Code §21074, if so:

2. Determine if the resource is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register on a “Local register of historical or resources” pursuant to Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k); or

3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code § 5024.1 (c) as it pertains to the Consulting Tribe(s): (1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage, (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past, (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values, or (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

d) If the resource(s) are Native American in origin [and not a historical resource as defined by Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k) or §5024.1 (c)], the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Consulting Tribe(s) deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If multiple Consulting Tribes(s) are involved, and a mutual agreement cannot be reached as to the form and manner of disposition of the resource(s), the City shall request input from the Native American Heritage Commission and render a final decision.

e) If the resource(s) is both a tribal cultural resource and a historic resource, the Project Archaeologist, the Consulting Tribe(s), and the City of Jurupa Valley

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 28
Planning Department shall meet and confer and discuss the appropriate treatment (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural and historic resource.

Treatment, at a minimum, shall be consistent with Public Resources Code § 21084.3(b). The appropriate treatment shall be prepared in conjunction with the Archaeological Treatment plan required by Mitigation Measure MM -CR-2 of the Initial Study for MA21256. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until the appropriate treatment has been accomplished.

MM TCR-3 Final Reporting: If a Tribal cultural resource is also a historic resource defined above, the resource shall be included in the Final Report required by Mitigation Measure MM- CR-2 of the Initial Study for MA21256.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure s TCR 1 through TCR 3 would ensure that impacts to any unanticipated tribal cultural resources that are encountered would be less than significant.

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THAT REMAIN SIGNIFICANT AND

UNAVOIDABLE AFTER MITIGATION
The Jurupa Valley City Council finds the Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts for Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Land Use and Planning after implementation of all feasible mitigation measures. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15092(b)(2), the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley cannot approve the project unless it first finds (1) under PRC Section 21081(a)(3), and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3), that specific economic, legal, social technological, or other considerations, including provisions of employment opportunities to highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR; and (2) under CEQA Guidelines section 15092(b), that the remaining significant effects are acceptable due to overriding concerns described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 and, therefore, a statement of overriding considerations has been prepared.

4.1 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

4.1.1 THRESHOLD 4.1(E) (EIR)
Impact Assessment: For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?

 Findings
Potential impacts of the Project related to Threshold 4.1(e) are discussed in detail in Section 4.1 of the Draft EIR. There are no feasible mitigation measures to reduce impacts to less than significant given that the impact arises from an inconsistency with an applicable land use plan (Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan [“ALUP”]).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 29
 Substantial Evidence
According to the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, October 2011, “…the land use compatibility concerns of airport land use commissions (ALUCs) fall under two broad headings identified in state law: noise and safety. However, for purposes of formulating compatibility policies and criteria, further dividing these basic concerns into four functional categories is more practical.

These categories are:

• Noise: As defined by the exposure to noise attributable to aircraft operations. • Overflight: As defined by the annoyance and other general concerns arising from routine aircraft flight over a community.
• Safety: As defined by the protection of people on the ground and in the air from accidents. • Airspace Protection: As defined by the protection of airspace from hazards to flight.” (page 3- 1, Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, 2011).

Of the above -described categories, noise and overflight were screened out as an issue by the Initial Study as the Project’s Noise Impact Study found that the expected noise levels from the Flabob Airport at the project site fall within the normally acceptable limit (less than 60 dBA). Therefore, the exterior noise impact from the airport would be within the allowable limits for residential land uses and the project is considered compatible with the surrounding land use and noise environment. Additionally, standard building design and construction methods would provide adequate noise attenuation to comply with the indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL and thereby not expose residents of the Project to excessive noise levels.

The primary compatibility concern with the Project involves safety for people on the ground in the event of an aircraft accident.

According to the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, October 2011, “From the standpoint of land use planning, two variables determine the degree of risk posed by potential aircraft accidents:

• Accident Frequency: Where and when aircraft accidents occur in the vicinity of an airport; and • Accident Consequences: Land uses and land use characteristics that affect the severity of an accident when one occurs.
(page 3-11, Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, 2011).

ALUP Consistency

The Riverside County ALUC determined the Project was not consistent with the Flabob ALUP due to the residential density restrictions for Zone C limit of residential density to 0.2 du/ac and Zone D limit of residential density to 0.2 to 0.4 du/ac, which are shown more fully on Draft EIR p. 53 [Table 4-3].

Additionally, the ALUC reviewed the Project under County Wide Policy 3.3.1 Infill which allows for greater densities than would otherwise be permitted in Zones C and D, but caps the densities at double

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 30
the allowable density for the zone. As the maximum density in Zone C is 0.2 dwelling units per acre, and the maximum density in Zone D is either below 0.2 dwelling units per acre or above 5.0 dwelling units per acre, doubling the density increases the limit from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre for Zone C, and from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre (on the low end), and from 5.0 to 10.0 dwelling units per acre (on the high end) for Zone D. The Project’s density of 1.60 dwelling units per acre would still be inconsistent with the doubled density provision for both zones.

The ALUC also found that the Project fails to provide the required open space areas for emergency landings. Compatibility Zone C requires 20% and Zone D requires 10% of open area for projects 10 acres or larger be set aside as open area that could potentially serve as emergency landing areas. The ALUC staff report indicated that approximately 17.95 acres was located within Zone C requiring 3.59 acres of open space and approximately 0.6 acres located within Zone D requiring 0.06 acres of open space for a total of 3.65 acres of open space requirements.

Finally, the ALUC found that the project had not accepted or confirmed provisions for water quality basin(s) to reduce Hazards to Flight concerning wildlife populations on or near airports that could significantly increase the potential for Bird Aircraft S trike Hazards (BASH). To reduce the potential Hazards to Flight impacts from BASH to less than significant , Mitigation Measure (MM) HAZ -1 is required. This Mitigation Measure will not address the Project’s inconsistency with the Zone C and D restrictions for residential density or open space requirements, and there is no feasible mitigation to address that inconsistency. However, it should also be noted the Project proposes no uses that are specifically prohibited within Zones C and D (e.g., day care centers, building with 3 aboveground habitable floors, etc.).

Airport Operations and Public Safety

While the ALUC determined the Project is not consistent with the Flabob Airport ALUP, the City’s CEQA significance threshold is based on whether the Project would “result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area” and not strictly whether it is consistent with the ALUP.

To that end, the applicant submitted a safety evaluation of the proposed Project prepared by Allen Aviation Consultant Services, LLC., (Appendix B-1).

The Allen Aviation Aeronautical Obstruction Evaluation Study report prepared a Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 evaluation of the Project for objects affecting navigable airspace. According to the FAA the federal regulation establishes requirements to notify the FAA of certain construction or alterations and obstruction standards for proposed construction or alteration of existing structures. Any object that exceeds Part 77 Obstruction Standards is considered an obstruction and presumed to be a hazard to air navigation unless further aeronautical study concludes the obstruction would not affect the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace and the operation of planned or existing air navigation and communication facilities. Part 77 applies to both existing and proposed objects as well as existing and planned runways. While this federal regulation mandates notice requirements and establishes obstruction standards, the FAA has no legal authority to prohibit construction of structures regardless of proximity to public use airports. State governments and/or local municipalities with zoning,

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 31
permitting, and land (property) use authority can deny construction applications that would encroach on public use airports. The Allen Aviation Report concluded the buildings of the Project, as proposed, would not infringe on the imaginary surfaces of the navigable airspace or other safety criteria established for the Flabob Airport (page 12, Allen Aviation, 2023). Additionally, the FAA issued “No Hazard to Air Navigation” Determination Letters attached as Appendix B-3. This analysis determined the Project would also not have significant impacts on these airport safety and flight operations.

In sum, the Project is not consistent with the land use intensity limits or open space requirements of the Flabob ALUP. The evaluation in Table 4.3-2 of the Draft EIR demonstrates that the Project also is not fully consistent with all of the policies of the City General Plan relative to the Flabob Airport. It is important to note the General Plan policy inconsistencies all result from the Project exceeding the land use intensity limits of the Flabob ALUP for both residential uses. However, the Allen Aviat ion Report and FAA Determination Letters demonstrated the Project would not result in significant risks to airport operations or safety, or a significant risk to public health or safety.

Based on the available information and erring on the side of caution, the Draft EIR concluded that the Project may result in a significant environmental impact in terms of airport hazards (i.e., Flabob ALUP inconsistency). Any measures that would effectively mitigate the impacts of the Project regarding consistency with the Flabob ALUP density and open space requirements would require a reduction of residential units on the site. The current General Plan Land Use on the site would provide for development of 10 residential units, however under the ALUP only 3 units would be allowed in Zone C under the 0.2 du/acre, and 3 units in Zone D under the 5 du/acre allowable density. No units would be allowed in Zone D under the ALUC 0.2 du/acre density requirement. The maximum number of units under the ALUP would only permit up to 6 units, and therefore the P roject would remain inconsistent if developed within the current land use provisions and ALUP density requirements.

Because the Flabob ALUP also identifies a number of potential land use conflicts for future development within Zones C and D of the ALUP, development of the proposed Project, due to the inconsistency with the Flabob ALUP, could make a significant contribution to a cumulatively considerable impact rela ted to airport safety and land use compatibility. This impact is considered significant and unavoidable.

Because there is no feasible mitigation for this impact, approval of the Project require s adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations by the City Council.

MM-HAZ-1 Airport Hazardous Wildlife Attractant Mitigation:

a. The water quality basin (WQB) shall be designed to provide a 48‐hour drawdown time during a 24‐hour rainfall event.

b. Regular maintenance shall be provided to eliminate seeding, shelter, and unsuitable vegetation.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 32
c. Establish a planting, maintenance, and management plan for the WQB and the surrounding areas to ensure compliance with the ALUC requirements. The plan should specifically address measures to minimize attractiveness of the proposed basin for hazardous bird species.

d. Proposed plantings for the project used to landscape the WQB shall comply with the ALUC’s landscaping brochure recommendations to avoid landscaping or provide appropriate landscaping that will not attract hazardous wildlife.

e. Per the ALUC’s Landscaping Near Airports brochure recommendations, trees planted around the proposed WQB should be spaced to prevent overlapping crown structures. In addition, planting trees with verifiable canopy heights, as noted in the ALUC brochure is recommended.

f. The WQB shall be designed to include slopes greater than 2:1 or 3:1 in the “hydromod” portions of the facility in order to minimize shelter and nesting opportunities for hazardous wildlife.

g. Per the ALUC a notice sign, shall be permanently affixed to the stormwater basin with the following language: “There is an airport nearby. This stormwater basin is designed to hold stormwater for only 48 hours and not attract birds. Proper maintenance is necessary to avoid bird strikes”. The sign will also include the name, telephone number or other contact information of the person or entity responsible to monitor the WQB basin.

Both direct and cumulative impacts remain significant and unavoidable after imposition of all feasible mitigation due to inconsistency with the ALUP and certain General Plan policies.

4.2 LAND USE AND PLANNING

4.2.1 THRESHOLD 4.2(B) (EIR)
Impact Assessment: Would the Project c ause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?

 Findings
Potential impacts of the Project related to Threshold 4.2(b) are discussed in detail in Section 4.2 of the Draft EIR. There are no feasible mitigation measures to reduce impacts to under this threshold. Impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 33
 Substantial Evidence
Specific General Plan policies that are related to the Project, along with a determination of consistency, are identified in Table 4.6, General Plan Consistency Analysis, of the Draft EIR. During the City’s review of the Project’s application materials, th e Jurupa Valley Planning Department reviewed the proposed development for consistency with all applicable policies of the General Plan and found that there would be no conflict with any applicable General Plan policies resulting from development of the Project site with the exception of the Land Use policies related to the ALUP and Flabob Airport, discussed below.

Table 4.6 provides an analysis of the Project’s consistency with applicable General Plan policies directly related to determining if the Project would cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

The ALUC determined the Project was not consistent with the Flabob ALUP due to the residential density restrictions for Zone C limit of residential density to 0.2 du/ac and Zone D limit of residential density to 0.2 to 0.4 du/ac. Additionally, the ALUC determined that under County Wide Policy 3.3.1 Infill which allows for greater densities thank would otherwise be permitted in Zones C and D, but cap the densities at double the allowable density for the zone. As the maximum density in Zone C is 0.2 dwelling units per acre, and the maximum density in Zone D is either below 0.2 dwelling units per acre or above 5.0 dwelling units per acre, doubling the density increases the limit from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre for Zone C, and from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre (on the low end), and from 5.0 to 10.0 dwelling units per acre (on the high end) for Zone D. The project's density of 1.60 dwelling units per acre would still be inconsistent with the doubled density provision for both zones.

The ALUC also found that the Project fails to provide the required open space areas for emergency landings. Compatibility Zone C requires 20% and Zone D requires 10% of open area for projects 10 acres or larger be set aside as open area that could potentially serve as emergency landing areas. The ALUC staff report indicated that approximately 17.95 acres was located within Zone C requiring 3.59 acres of open space and approximately 0.6 acres located within Zone D requiring 0.06 acres of open space for a total of 3.65 acres of open space requirements.

The Project is not consistent with the land use intensity limits or open space requirements of the Flabob ALUP. However, the Allen Aviation Report and FAA Determination Letters (discussed above regarding Hazards) demonstrated the Project would not result in significant risks to airport operations or safety, or a significant risk to public health or safety. The evaluation in the EIR demonstrates that the Project is consistent with the policies of the City General Plan with the exception of those relative to the Flabob Airport. It is important to note the General Plan policy inconsistencies all result from the Project exceeding the land use intensity limits of the Flabob ALUP for residential uses.

Additionally, the current land use designation of EDR would also be inconsistent with the Flabob ALUP. Because there is no feasible mitigation for this impact, approval of the Project require adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations from the City Council.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 34
More specifically, the Project is inconsistent with General Plan Land Use Element Policies 5.55, 5.57,

5.58, and 5.61 regarding consistency with the Flabob ALUP. The Project would not conflict with any other aspects of the City’s General Plan or any other applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating adverse environmental effects. Cumulative development would also be subject to site -specific environmental and planning reviews that would address consistency with adopted land use plan, policy, or regulation. Cumulative impacts related to land use plan consistency also are significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this cumulative impact is required.

Any measures that would effectively mitigate the impacts of the proposed Project regarding consistency with the Flabob ALUP density and open space requirements would require a reduction of residential units on the site. The current General Plan Land Use on the site would provide for development of 10 residential units, however under the ALUP only 3 units would be allowed in Zone C under the 0.2 du/acre, and 3 units in Zone D under the 5 du/acre allowable density. No units would be allowed in Zone D under the ALUC 0.2 du/acre density requirement. The maximum number of units under the ALUP would only permit up to 6 units, therefore the Project would remain inconsistent if developed within the current land use provisions and ALUP density requirements.

There is no feasible mitigation available related to the Project’s inconsistencies with various General Plan policies regarding land use (inconsistent with Flabob ALUP). Both direct and cumulative impacts remain significant and unavoidable.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 35

5.0 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

5.1 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES
The State CEQA Guidelines require EIRs to address any significant irreversible environmental changes that would be involved with the proposed action should it be implemented (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.2[c]). An environmental change would fall into this category if: a) the project would involve a large commitment of non-renewable resources; b) the primary and secondary impacts of the project would generally commit future generations to similar uses; c) the proj ect involves uses in which irreversible damage could result from any potential environmental accidents; or d) the proposed consumption of resources is not justified (e.g., the project results in the wasteful use of energy).

 Finding
The Project’s potential to result in significant irreversible environmental changes is discussed in detail in Section 6.2 of the Draft EIR. Based on the entire record, the City finds that the Project would not result in significant irreversible environmental changes.

 Substantial Evidence
Implementation of the Project would commit future generations to the residential uses proposed by the Project on the Project site. As demonstrated in the analysis presented throughout Draft EIR Section

4.0, construction and long-term operation of the proposed Project would be compatible with existing and planned future land uses that surround the Project site and would not result in significant and unavoidable physical environmental effects to nearby properties. Although the Project would cause significant and unavoidable impacts to the environment associated with airport -related hazards and land use and planning as summarized above in Table 6-1, these effects would not commit surrounding properties to a particular land use other than those that are present under existing conditions or planned by the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan. The placement of new land uses under the proposed Project would have irreversible effects on the Flabob Airport Land Use Plan in terms of allowing development at intensities higher than allowed under that plan. However, the Project would not result in a significant irreversible change to nearby off-site properties.

Because no significant agricultural, biological, mineral, geological, or other sensitive or unique natural resources occur within the Project site as demonstrated in the Project’s Initial Study (refer to Appendix A-1), the Project is not expected to reduce the availability of any natural resources associated with long-term operational activities associated with the proposed Project. Also, residential operations of the proposed Project would utilize natural gas and electricity, some of which comes from renew able resources. However, the Project is required by law to comply with the California Building Standards Code which would minimize the Project’s demand for non-renewable resources. A more detailed discussion of the energy usage during construction and operations is provided in the Initial Study Section 4.6, Energy (Appendix A -1). Accordingly, the Project would not result in a wasteful consumption of energy and the Project would not result in a significant, irreversible change to the environment related to energy use.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 36

5.2 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS
CEQA requires a discussion of the ways in which the proposed Project could be growth inducing. The CEQA Guidelines identify a project as growth inducing if it would foster economic or population growth or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment (CEQA Guidelines §15126.2(d)).

 Finding
The Project’s potential to result in growth-inducing impacts is discussed in detail in Subsection 6.3 of the EIR. Based on the entire record, the City finds that the Project would not directly or indirectly induce growth in the surrounding area which could result in a significant adverse effect to the environment.

 Substantial Evidence
The Project is a residential development that will generate new residents on the site. The Initial Study Section 4.14 – Population and Housing estimates the proposed. Based on the State of California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, January 2021-2023 with 2020 Census Benchmark, the City of Jurupa Valley currently has 3.66 persons per household. Under the existing General Plan Land Use Plan the Project would result in a population of 37 persons (10 dwelling units x 3.66 persons per household = 37). The Project proposes 31 dwelling units so the actual estimated population would be 113 persons (31 dwelling units x 3.66 persons per household = 113). This assumes that all new residents would come from outside the City limits of Jurupa Valley. The Project could increase the population of the City above what is planned by the General Plan Land Use Plan by 76 persons. The current population of Jurupa Valley is approximately 104,983 (State of California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, January 2021-2023 with 2020 Census Benchmark). According to General Plan Table 2.2: Residential Land Use Statistics and Buildout Projections, the “buildout” population of the City is estimated to be 148,117 persons. Thus, the Project’s increase of population resulting in 76 persons would be minimal as compared to the buildout population of 148,117 persons.

Typically, population growth would be considered a significant impact, or a significant concern regarding growth inducement, if it directly or indirectly affects the ability of agencies to provide needed public services and requires the expansion or new construction of public facilities and utilities. Water and sewer service to the Project site will be provided by the Rubidoux Community Services District from existing facilities in Riverview Drive and Rio Road. No additional water or sewer infrastructure will be needed to serve the Project other than connection to the existing water and sewer lines. Water and sewer infrastructure will not have to be extended in the area to serve the Project. In addition, the analysis in Section 4.19, Utilities and Service Systems, of the Initial Study Checklist (see Appendix A-1) demonstrates that the impacts on public services are less than significant so the public service provider’s ability to provide services will not be reduced. Therefore,

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 37
the amount of growth represented by the proposed Project is not expected to induce additional or substantial unanticipated growth into the surrounding area in the foreseeable future.

The proposed Project also would create short-term construction-related jobs. It is expected that the majority of the construction-related employees would be drawn from the existing labor force that would be available in the local area and region.

A project could indirectly induce growth at the local level by increasing the demand for additional goods and services associated with an increase in population or employment and thus reducing or removing the barriers to growth. This typically occurs in suburban or rural environs where population growth results in increased demand for service and commodity markets responding to the new population of residents or employees. The Project’s construction-related and operational- related residents would purchase goods and services in the region, but any secondary increase in employment associated with meeting these goods and services needs is expected to be marginal, accommodated by existing goods and service providers, and highly unlikely to result in any new physical impacts to the environment based on the amount of available commercial and retail services available in areas near the Project site, including the Cities of Riverside, Ontario, Fontana, and Norco. Accordingly, the onsite housing and employment generation would not induce substantial growth in the area because it is anticipated that the Project’s future residents and employees would already be living in and around the general area of Jurupa Valley.

Furthermore, the Project’s potential influence on other nearby properties to redevelop at greater intensities and/or different uses than the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code allow is speculative beyond the rule of reason. CEQA does not require the analysis of speculative effects (CEQA Guidelines §151454). If any other property owner were to propose development or redevelopment of a property in the Project vicinity or in any part of the City, the project would require evaluation under CEQA based on its own merits, including an analysis of direct and cumulatively considerable effects.

Under CEQA, growth inducement is not considered necessarily detrimental, beneficial, or of little significance to the environment. Typically, growth-inducing potential of a project would be considered significant if it fosters growth or a concentration of population in excess of what is assumed in pertinent master plans, land use plans, or in projections made by regional planning agencies such as SCAG. Significant growth impacts also could occur if a project provides infrastructure or service capacity to accommodate growth beyond the levels currently permitted by local or regional plans and policies. In general, growth induced by a project is considered a significant impact if it directly or indirectly affects the ability of agencies to provide needed public services, or if it can be demonstrated that the potential growth significantly affects the environment in some other way.

For the reasons outlined above, it is unlikely, speculative, and not reasonably foreseeable that the Project would induce substantial growth in the form of additional housing or non-residential economic activity or employment that would result in measurable impacts on the off-site physical environment. In addition, the development of the proposed Project would not reasonably or foreseeably cause the redevelopment of other properties or cause development on other properties

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 38

6.0 ALTERNATIVES

6.1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND REJECTED
An EIR is required to identify any alternatives that were considered by the Lead Agency but were rejected as infeasible. Among the factors described by CEQA Guidelines §15126.6 in determining whether to exclude alternatives from detailed consideration in the EIR are a) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, b) infeasibility, or c) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts.

With respect to the feasibility of potential alternatives to the proposed Project, CEQA Guidelines §15126.6(f)(1) notes:

“Among the factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives are site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, other plans or regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries…and whether the proponent can reasonably acquire, control or otherwise have access to the alternative site…”

In determining an appropriate range of alternatives to be evaluated in the EIR, possible alternatives were initially considered and, for a variety of reasons, rejected. Alternatives were rejected because either: 1) they could not accomplish the basic objectives of the Project, 2) they would not have resulted in a reduction of significant adverse environmental impacts, or 3) they were considered infeasible to construct or operate.

Several “less intense” alternatives were initially discussed that would reduce the number of residential units of the proposed Project. Due to the limits of the Flabob ALUP, which would only allow 0.2 dwelling units per acre or 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres, essentially 3 units on the site, there were no viable alternatives that allowed the maximum residential units on the property under the current General Plan Land Use at 0.5 dwelling units per acre (10 units total) or Proposed Land Use Designation at 2 dwe lling units per acre (37 units total). However, several alternatives involving non-residential uses were considered for the Project site including Commercial Retail and Commercial Neighborhood.

For the purposes of this EIR, one “all retail” alternative (FAR = 0.35) was selected for additional study (see below). This alternative was selected for further analysis to determine what environmental impacts would result from full use of the site by the non-residential land use, but it is possible that commercial office use or some combination of commercial and office uses would also be a feasible land use alternative. CEQA requires an analysis of a reasonable range of alternatives, and not every possible permutation of land use combinations.

The City of Jurupa Valley considered but rejected two alternatives: an alternative that would develop the proposed Project as Commercial Neighborhood (CN) and developing the Project on an alternative site. The Commercial Neighborhood alternative was not i ncluded as the it would still require both a General Plan Amendment and a Zone Change and only be viable on up to 5 acres of the project site due to the CN land use in the General Plan being applied to smaller commercial centers generally limited to less than 5-acres. CEQA does not require that an analysis of alternative sites always be included in an EIR. However, if the surrounding circumstances make it reasonable to consider an

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 39
alternative site, then this alternative should be considered and analyzed in the EIR. In making the decision to include or exclude analysis of an alternative site, the “key question and first step in analysis is whether any of the significant effects of the project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the project in another location. Only locations that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project need to be considered for inclusion in the EIR” (CEQA Guidelines §15126.6(f) (2)).

The Project proposes to develop 19.36 acres of primarily vacant land into a subdivision and construction of 31 single-family lots (1.6 dwelling units per acre). In the immediate surrounding area, there a several small vacant or under-utilized parcels to the south, each of these are located in the EDR Land Use however the lots are significantly smaller ranging from 1 to 5 acres. In the larger surrounding area, there are is limited vacant land. The majority of the land in the area consists of rural residentia l, estate residential, and single-family residential uses.

The Project Applicant does not hold ownership control over any other parcels of land in or near the Project site that could be used as an alternative location for the proposed Project. Each of the sites noted in the area surrounding the Proposed project would not move the Project to another site that was not within the land use restrictions of the Flabob Airport Land Use Plan and the smaller lot sizes would further limit the number of dwelling units that could be developed.

Because the Project Applicant does not have ownership control over, and cannot reasonably obtain ownership control over, any other parcels of land in the nearby area under the jurisdiction of the City of Jurupa Valley that could accommodate the Project, an alternative location alternative is not feasible.

6.2 ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED

6.2.1 NO PROJECT/ NO DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE
The No Project/No Development Alternative considers no development/disturbance on the Project site beyond that which occurs under existing conditions. As such, the approximately 19.36-acre Project site would continue to consist of primarily vacant land. Under this Alternative, no improvements would be made to the Project site and none of the Project’s roadway, drainage, utility, and other infrastructure improvements would occur. This alternative is required by CEQA and is included to compare the environmental effects of the Project with an alternative that would leave the Project site undeveloped in its existing condition.

The No Project/No Development Alternative would result in no physical environmental impacts to the Project site. All significant and unavoidable impacts of the Project would be eliminated by the selection of the No Project/No Development Alternative. While it is acknowledged that this Alternative would not achieve the City’s General Plan vision in terms of developing the site with residential land uses, no significant adverse environmental impacts would result from leaving the property in its existing condition. The No Project/No Development Alternative would not fulfill the underlying purpose of the

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 40
Project or meet any of the Project’s objectives because the site would remain undeveloped and utilized in its current condition.

Thus, the City Council hereby finds that the No Project/No Development Alternative would not meet any Project objectives and further finds that this reason justifies rejection of the No Project/No Development Alternative.

6.2.2 GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE
The General Plan Development Alternative proposes land uses consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use Map - the site is designated for Ranch uses (EDR – 0.5 units/acre max.). This designation means the site could be developed with up to 10 residential units.

This alternative would not require a General Plan Amendment. The Project site is located within two Compatibility Zones, Compatibility Zone C (17.95 acres) and Compatibility Zone D (0.6 acres). At this development density, the project would still not meet the Flabob Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP) maximum allowable density of 0.2 dwelling units per acre for Compatibility Zone C or the maximum allowable density of either below 0.2 units per acre or above 5.0 dwelling units per acre for Compatibility Zone D. The result of the General Plan Development Alternative would result in 3 units allowed in Zone C under the 0.2 du/acre, and 3 units in Zone D under the 5 du/acre allowable density.

No units would be allowed in Zone D under the ALUC 0.2 du/acre density requirement.

At the development density proposed in the General Plan Development Alternative the residential use would not meet the ALUP maximum allowable density of 0.2 dwelling units per acre for Compatibility Zone C or the maximum allowable density of either below 0.2 units per acre or above 5.0 dwelling units per acre for Compatibility Zone D. The result of the General Plan Development Alternative would result in 3 units allowed in Zone C under the 0.2 du/acre, and 3 units in Zone D under the 5 du/acre allowable den sity. No units would be allowed in Zone D under the ALUC 0.2 du/acre density requirement; therefore, it is still inconsistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Policies 5.56,

5.57, 5.58, 5.61 regarding consistency with the Flabob Airport Land Use Plan (ALUP). Therefore, this Alternative still has significant impacts relative to Hazards and Hazardous Materials, similar to the proposed Project.

As identified in Draft EIR Subsection 4.2, Land Use and Planning, the Project would not conflict with the policies from the General Plan with the exception of Land Use Element Policies 5.56, 5.57, 5.58,

5.61 regarding consistency with the Flabob Airport La nd Use Plan (ALUP). Even though this Alternative is consistent with the land use designations of the General Plan for this site, it is still inconsistent with the General Plan policies cited above and thus would have significant impacts relative to Land Use and Planning, similar to the proposed Project.

In sum, similar to the Project, the General Plan Development Alternative would still have significant impacts related to Hazards and Hazardous Materials and Land Use and Planning in that it is inconsistent with Land Use Element Policies 5.56, 5.57, 5.58, 5.61. This alternative would meet the

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 41
Project objectives to a similar degree as the proposed Project as it would provide residential use but would not provide the density requested by the proposed Project.

Thus, the City Council finds that the General Plan Development Alternative would not fully meet the Project objectives, including in the important area of providing a range of housing opportunities; this is particularly important to the City’s growth and ability to support housing choices for a variety of population, lifestyle and family groups, and to help address the State Legislature’s declared housing crisis (see Housing Accountability Act, Gov’t Code § 65589.5). In addition, this Alternative does not avoid either of the Project’s significant impacts in the areas of Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Land Use and Planning. Consequently, this Alternative still results in significant and unavoidable impacts in the same areas as the Project, without achieving the same benefits. The City Council hereby finds that each of the reasons set forth above would be an independent ground for rejecting the General Plan Development Alternative, and by itself, independent of any other reason, would justify rejection of the General Plan Develpopment Alternative.

6.2.3 COMMERCIAL RETAIL ALTERNATIVE
The Commercial Retail Alternative would develop the Project site into commercial uses. If the entire site were to support commercial retail uses, a maximum of 295,163 square feet of commercial space could be built on the 19.36-acre site based on an FAR of 0.35. This alternative would require a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to eliminate the Estate (EDR) land use designation to Commercial Retail (CR). Due to the number of vehicular trips generated by retail uses, this alternative may result in increased traffic and air quality impacts. General Plan Table 2.3 Non-Residential Land Use Statistics and Buildout Projections, indicates retail uses generate 1 employee per 600 square feet which would result in 492 employees for the site. The Riverside Airport Land Use Plan (ALUC) maximum densities/intensities for non -residential land uses would allow for 2,700 people in the Zone C and another 180 in Zone D for a total of 2,880 person which would include employees and customers. With the estimated 492 employees on- site, that allows for only 2,388 customers, the exact number of anticipated customers cannot be estimated without knowing the future types of retail businesses that could be present.

Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center > 150,000 square feet) 3.81 trips per unit per 1,000 square feet of retail space the commercial retail alternative would result in approxima tely 1,125 trips per day. Under the proposed Project the daily trips would be 293, the commercial retail would create a 284 percent increase in traffic.

It is unknown if this Alternative would eliminate significant impacts related to Hazards and Hazardous Materials (i.e., consistency with the Flabob ALUP) as the number of customers on-site at any given time cannot forecast without details on types of business that may be present. This Alternative would continue to impact relative Land Use and Planning since it would not be consistent with the General Plan, Zoning or potentially the policies regarding the Flabob ALUP. Additionally, this Alternative would have a significant direct and cumulative traffic impacts as it would generate almost 284 percent

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 42
more traffic compared to the proposed Project, which would additionally create potential environmental impacts to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Traffic.

In sum, compared to the Project, the Commercial Retail Alternative could eliminate significant impacts related to Hazards (i.e., ALUP Consistency) and would have reduced impacts relative to Land Use and Planning as this alternative could be consistent with the General Plan policies regarding the Flabob ALUP. However, this Alternative could have significant traffic impacts and would generate considerably more traffic than the proposed Project (eg., 1,125 daily trips compared to 293 trips for the Project). This alternative would provide a substantial amount of commercial use in a residential area and would not provide for any residential use. This Alternative may have substantially increased VMT, Greenhouse Gas and Air Quality Emissions, as well as Noise impacts compared to the Project and does not meet the Project objectives.

Thus, the City Council finds that the Commercial Retail Alternative would not fully meet the Project objectives, including in the important are of providing a range of housing opportunities; this is particularly important to the City’s growth and ability to support housing choices for a variety of population, lifestyle and family groups, and to help address the Sta te Legislature’s declared housing crisis (see Housing Accountability Act, Gov’t Code § 65589.5). In addition, while this Alternative lessens the Hazards and Hazardous Materials impacts, it still does not avoid significant environmental impacts in the areas of Land Use and Planning, and increases adverse impacts related to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Traffic . Consequently, this Alternative still results in significant and unavoidable impacts in one of the same areas as the Project without achieving the same benefits, and creates other significant impacts. The City Council hereby finds that each of the reasons set forth above would be an independent ground for rejecting the Commercial Retail Alternative, and by itself, independent of any other reason, would justify rejection of the Commercial Retail Alternative.

6.2.4 ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE
CEQA requires the identification of an environmentally superior alternative. Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines states that, if the No Project Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, then the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives.

Because the No Project/No Development Alternative would result in lower impacts resulting from construction and operation of the Project to less than significant levels, it is the environmentally superior alternative.

Based on the analysis in Section 6.0, Alternatives, the General Plan Development Alternative would be environmentally superior to the Project. Under this Alternative, impacts related to NOx emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, and VMT will be less when compared to the Project but may remain significant and unavoidable for Flabob Airport Compatibility.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 43

7.0 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
This Section specifically addresses §15093 of the CEQA Guidelines, which requires the City, acting as the Lead Agency, to balance the benefits of the Project against its significant and unavoidable adverse environmental impacts and determine whether the be nefits which will accrue from the development of the Project outweigh its significant and unavoidable impacts. If the City finds that the major benefits of the Project outweigh its significant and unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, the City may approve the Project. Each of the separate benefits listed below are hereby determined to be, in itself, and independent of the Project’s other benefits, the basis for overriding all significant and unavoidable environmental impacts identified in the EIR.

As set forth above, the EIR identified all of the Project’s adverse environmental impacts and mitigation measures that can reduce the Project’s impacts to less -than-significant level where feasible, or to the lowest feasible levels. Mitigation imposed by the City must have a proportional nexus to the Project’s impacts. As further set forth above , the EIR presents evidence that implementing the Project would cause or contribute to impacts that would remain significant and unavoidable even after the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures. Finally, there are no feasible alternatives to the Project that would mitigate the Project’s significant and avoidable impacts to less -than-significant level or avoid those environmental impacts while still attaining most of the Project’s basic objectives . Based on the facts presented throughout this document, the City makes the following finding:

 Finding
As the CEQA Lead Agency for the proposed Project, the City has reviewed the Project description and the alternatives to the Project, as presented in the EIR, and the City fully understands the Project and its alternatives. Further, the City finds that all potential adverse environmental impacts and all feasible mitigation measures to reduce the impacts from the Project have been identified in the Final EIR, supporting documents in the administrative record, and public testimony. Having considered the potential for the Project to cause or contribute to significant and unavoidable adverse impacts to Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Land Use and Planning , the City hereby determines that all feasible mitigation measures with proportional nexus to the Project’s impacts have been adopted to reduce or avoid the significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the EIR, and that no additional feasible mitigation or alternatives are available to further reduce or avoid significant impacts. Further, the City fin ds that economic, social, and other considerations of the Project outweigh the Project’s unavoidable impacts to Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Land Use and Planning and that approval of the Project is appropriate . In making this finding, the City Council finds that each of the Project benefits separately and individually outweighs all of the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. The Project would meet the following objectives:

a) Assist the City in meeting its housing goals and reflect anticipated market needs and public demand, by providing a diverse range of home types with the intent to blend into the City of Jurupa Valley's rural character.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 44
b) Develop a vacant residential property with close proximity to SR-60 that is readily accessible to existing and available infrastructure, including roads and utilities.

Furthermore, substantial evidence in the record demonstrates that approval and implementation of the Project will provide the benefits listed below:

a) As set forth i n detail in the Findings, all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce Project environmental effects to less than significant levels.

b) The Project would allow for the development of a property with residential uses, thus helping to address the State Legislature’s declared housing crisis (see Housing Accountability Act, Gov’t Code § 65589.5).

c) The Project will provide a range of housing opportunities that will diversify the City’s housing stock. The Project’s housing plans include next generation living spaces that include flexible rooms to serve the needs of multiple generations of family members and diverse lifestyles (e.g., rooms can serve as office, gym, or game room).

d) The Project's attractive Farmhouse and Mission architecture, traditional neighborhood streetscape and landscaping, and enhanced entryways and overall site improvements makes the Project a showcase project for housing.

e) The Project will activate vacant property with large lots and single -story homes that will eliminate public nuisance and safety issues ( e.g., illegal dumping, fires, homelessness) and blend with community.

f) The Project provides for large lots for animal keeping and accommodation of animal trailers.

g) The Project provides new equestrian trail along Riverview Drive.

h) The Project creates the opportunity for new residents to support local businesses.

i) The new construction-related jobs provided by the Project will create direct and indirect economic benefits.

j) The Project will provide beneficial infrastructure improvements to the area.

In conclusion, the City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided through approval of the Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts. The City Council further finds that each of the individual benefits discussed above outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and, therefore, finds those impacts to be acceptable.

The City Council further finds that each of the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to override these unavoidable environmental impacts.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A SCH No. 2022060680
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Findings of Fact and SOOC Page 45

8.0 ADDITIONAL FACTS ON RECORD

8.1 CUSTODIAN OF RECORD
The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Jurupa Valley, Planning Division, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA, 92660. The custodian for these records is Thomas Gorham, through the Planning Division.

This information is provided in compliance with PRC § 21081.6.

B-1

Exhibit B

Mitigation Monitoring Program

Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
5 MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM
PROJECT NAME: MA 21256 Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project (Tentative Tract Map No. 38171) DATE: November 29, 2023
PROJECT MANAGER: Thomas Gorham, Principal Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project proposes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the land use designation from EDR (Ranch) to LDR (County Neighborhood) to accommodate up to 2 dwelling units per acre. The Project is proposed to be constructed on an approximately 19.36-acre subdivision and consists of 31 single family lots or 1.6 dwelling units per acre.

The principal discretionary actions required of the City of Jurupa Valley to implement the Project include approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21008 and Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 (referred to by the City of Jurupa Valley as Master Application [MA] No. 21256).

PROJECT LOCATION: The Project site is located on approximately 19.36 acres on the southeast of Limonite Avenue and northwest of Riverview Drive at 6550 Limonite Avenue. The Project site is identified by the following Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 186-160-021 Throughout this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, reference is made to the following:
•
Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) - These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project based on the basis of federal, state, or local law currently in place which effectively reduce environmental impacts. • Mitigation Measures (MM) - These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance wi th the requirements of CEQA.

Any applicable Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) were assumed and accounted for in the assessment of impacts for each issue area.

Mitigation Measures were formulated only for those issue areas where the results of the impact analysis identified significant impacts.

All three types of measures described above will be required to be implemented as part of the Project.

EEXHIBIT B
Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 6 MITIGATION MEASURE (MM) PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP) RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME/MILESTONE VERIFIED BY: AESTHETICS PPP 4.1-1 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal Code section 9.175.030, A-1 Zone (Light Agriculture) development standards include, but not limited to, development standards for structures, lot sizes, yard requirements, and structure heights. Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of building permits PPP 4.1-2 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal Code section 7.50.010, all utilities serving and within the Project site shall be placed underground unless exempted by this section. Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits PPP 4.1-3 All outdoor lighting shall be designed and installed to comply with California Green Building Standard Code Section 5.106 or with a local ordinance lawfully enacted pursuant to California Green Building Standard Code Section 101.7, whichever is more stringent.

Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of building permits AIR QUALITY PPP 4.3-1 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403, “Fugitive Dust.” Rule 403 requires implementation of best available dust control measures during construction activities that generate fugitive dust, such as earth moving and stockpiling activities, grading, and equipment travel on unpaved roads.

Public Works and Engineering Department During grading
PPP 4.3-2. The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality District Rule 431.2, “Sulphur Content and Liquid Fuels.” The purpose of this rule is to limit the sulfur content in diesel and other liquid fuels for the purpose of both reducing the formation of sulfur oxides and particulates during combustion and to enable the use of add-on control devices for diesel fueled internal combustion engines.

Building & Safety Department During construction
PPP 4.3-3 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113, “Architectural Coatings”. Rule 1113 limits the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere during painting and application of other surface coatings.

Building & Safety Department Engineering Department Community Development Department During construction and on-going.

PPP 4.3-4 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1186 “PM10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads and Livestock Operations” and Rule 1186.1, “Less-Polluting Street Sweepers. Community Development Department On-going Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 7 MITIGATION MEASURE (MM) PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP) RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME/MILESTONE VERIFIED BY: Adherence to Rules 1186 and 1186.1 reduces the release of criteria pollutant emissions specifically PM10 and PM2.5 into the atmosphere due to trackout from vehicles leaving the construction site. PPP 4.3-5 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 “Nuisance.” Adherence to Rule 402 reduces the release of odorous emissions into the atmosphere.

Building & Safety Department, Engineering Department, Community Development Department During construction and on-going.

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES PPP 4.4-1 The Project is required to pay mitigation fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MHSCP) as required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.80. Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit MM- BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey and Protection. To maintain compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513, site preparation activities (such as ground disturbance, construction activities, and/or removal of trees and vegetation) should be conducted, to the greatest extent possible, outside of the nesting season. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading. The survey area will include the project impact footprint and a 500-foot buffer where legal access is granted around the disturbance footprint. Within 72 hours of the nesting bird survey, all areas surveyed by the biologist will be cleared by the Contractor or a supplemental nesting bird survey is required. The survey results shall be provided to the City’s Community Development Department. The Project Applicant shall adhere to the following: 1. Applicant shall designate a biologist (Designated Biologist) experienced in: identifying local and migratory bird species of special concern; conducting bird surveys using appropriate survey methodology; nesting surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding territories, and identifying nesting stages and Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 8 MITIGATION MEASURE (MM) PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP) RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME/MILESTONE VERIFIED BY: nest success; determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures. 2. Pre-activity field surveys shall be conducted at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions, no more than 3 days prior to the initiation of Project activities. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate. If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If active nests or nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are identified during the nesting bird survey, avoidance buffers shall be implemented as determined by a qualified biologist and approved by the City of Jurupa Valley, based on their best professional judgement and experience. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the Project biologist determines the young have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The buffer shall be of a distance to ensure avoidance of adverse effects to the nesting bird by accounting for topography, ambient conditions, species, nest location, and activity type. All nests shall be monitored as determined by the qualified biologist until nestlings have fledged and dispersed or it is confirmed that the nest has been unsuccessful or abandoned. The Designated Biologist shall monitor the nest at the onset of project activities, and at the onset of any changes in such project activities (e.g., increase in number or type of equipment, change in equipment usage, etc.) to determine the efficacy of the buffer. The qualified biologist shall halt all construction activities within proximity to an active nest if it is determined that the activities are harassing the nest and may result in nest abandonment or take. The qualified biologist shall also have the authority to require implementation of avoidance measures related to noise, vibration, or light pollution if indirect impacts are resulting in harassment of the nest. Work can resume within these avoidance areas when no Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 9 MITIGATION MEASURE (MM) PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP) RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME/MILESTONE VERIFIED BY: other active nests are found. Upon completion of the survey and nesting bird monitoring, a report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping. CULTURAL RESOURCES PPP 4.5-1 The project is required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code §7050.5 as well as Public Resources Code §5097 et. seq. Public Works and Engineering Department Prior to the issuance of grading permits and during construction MM- CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Permit Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department that a qualified professional archaeologist (Professional Archaeologist) that is listed on the City of Jurupa Valley Cultural Resources Consultant List or the Cultural Resource Consultant List maintained by the County of Riverside Planning Department, has been contracted to implement Archaeological Monitoring for the area of impact for the Project. Monitoring shall be conducted in coordination with the Consulting Tribe(s), defined as a Tribe that initiated the tribal consultation process for the Project as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b) (“AB52”) and has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City. Monitoring shall address the details of all ground-disturbing activities and provides procedures that must be followed to avoid or reduce potential impacts on cultural, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources to a level that is less than significant. A fully executed copy of the Archaeological Monitoring Agreement shall be provided to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department to ensure compliance with this measure. If the resource is significant, Mitigation Measure CR-2 shall apply.

Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the complete text of MM CR-1 shall be placed on the grading plan.

Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 10 MITIGATION MEASURE (MM) PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP) RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME/MILESTONE VERIFIED BY: MM- CR-2: Archaeological Treatment Plan. The Project Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a treatment plan to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall be per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code § 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementing archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource and subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. If historic Native American tribal cultural resources are involved, the Treatment Plan shall be coordinated with the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through TCR-3 of the Initial Study for MA21256.

Public Works and Engineering Department Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the complete text of MM CR-2 shall be placed on the grading plan.

MM- CR-3: Final Report. A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the Project Archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department and the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside. If a historic tribal cultural resource is involved, a copy shall be provided to the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through 3 of the Initial Study for MA21256.

Public Works and Engineering Department Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the complete text of MM CR-3 shall be placed on the grading plan.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS PPP 4.7-1 As required by Municipal Code Section 8.05.010, the Project is required to comply with the most recent edition of the California Building Code to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards. Building & Safety Department Prior to the issuance of building permits PPP’s 4.10-1 through PPP 4.10-3 in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality shall apply. Engineering Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and during operation MM- GEO-1: Archaeological Inadvertent Discovery. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified Archaeologist shall be retained to conduct monitoring as necessary during ground-disturbing activities such as vegetation removal, grading, and other excavations related to the project. The Archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference and shall establish a schedule for archaeological resource Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the complete text of MM GEO-1 shall be placed on the grading plan.

Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 11 MITIGATION MEASURE (MM) PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP) RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME/MILESTONE VERIFIED BY: surveillance based on the nature of planned activities. The Archaeologist shall establish, in cooperation with the lead agency, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work, if any is ongoing, to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of cultural resources as appropriate. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant, the Archaeological Monitor shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the lead agency, for exploration and/or salvage. Significant sites that cannot be avoided will require data recovery measures and shall be completed upon approval of a Data Recovery Plan.

MM- GEO-2: Archaeological Treatment Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre-grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (below 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should also be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level.

Public Works and Engineering Department Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the complete text of MM GEO-2 shall be placed on the grading plan.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS PPP 4.8-1 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant shall submit plans showing that the Project will be constructed in compliance with the most recently adopted edition of the applicable California Energy Code, (Part 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) and the California Green Building Standards Code, 2019 Edition (Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).

Building & Safety Department Prior to the issuance of building permits PPP 4.8-2 As required by Municipal Code Section 9.283.010, Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements, prior to the approval of landscaping plans, the Project proponent shall prepare and submit landscape plans that demonstrate compliance with this section. Building & Safety Department Prior to the issuance of building permits Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 12 MITIGATION MEASURE (MM) PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP) RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME/MILESTONE VERIFIED BY: HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MM-Haz-1 Airport Hazardous Wildlife Attractant Mitigation: a. The water quality basin (WQB) shall be designed to provide a 48-hour drawdown time during a 24-hour rainfall event. b. Regular maintenance shall be provided to eliminate seeding, shelter, and unsuitable vegetation. c. Establish a planting, maintenance, and management plan for the WQB and the surrounding areas to ensure compliance with the ALUC requirements. The plan should specifically address measures to minimize attractiveness of the proposed basin for hazardous bird species. d. Proposed plantings for the project used to landscape the WQB shall comply with the ALUC’s landscaping brochure recommendations to avoid landscaping or provide appropriate landscaping that will not attract hazardous wildlife. e. Per the ALUC’s Landscaping Near Airports brochure recommendations, trees planted around the proposed WQB should be spaced to prevent overlapping crown structures. In addition, planting trees with verifiable canopy heights, as noted in the ALUC brochure is recommended. f. The WQB shall be designed to include slopes greater than 2:1 or 3:1 in the “hydromod” portions of the facility in order to minimize shelter and nesting opportunities for hazardous wildlife. g. Per the ALUC a notice sign, shall be permanently affixed to the stormwater basin with the following language: “There is an airport nearby. This stormwater basin is designed to hold stormwater for only 48 hours and not attract birds. Proper maintenance is necessary to avoid bird strikes”. The sign will also include the name, telephone number or other contact information of the person or entity responsible to monitor the WQB basin.

Public Works and Engineering Department Prior to the issuance of grading permits During operation.

Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 13 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY PPP 4.10-1 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section B (1), any person performing construction work in the city shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and shall control storm water runoff so as to prevent any likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. The City Engineer shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration and shall identify the manner of implementation. Documentation on the effectiveness of BMPs implemented to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City Engineer.

Public Works and Engineering Department Prior to the issuance of grading permits PPP 4.10-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section B (2), any person performing construction work in the city shall be regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board in a manner pursuant to and consistent with applicable requirements contained in the General Permit No. CAS000002, State Water Resources Control Board Order Number 2009-0009-DWQ. The city may notify the State Board of any person performing construction work that has a non-compliant construction site per the General Permit.

Public Works and Engineering Department Prior to the issuance of grading permits and during construction PPP 4.10-3 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section C, new development, or redevelopment projects shall control storm water runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. The City Engineer shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration and shall identify the manner of implementation. Documentation on the effectiveness of BMPs implemented to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City Engineer. The BMPs may include, but are not limited to, the following and may, among other things, require new developments or redevelopments to do any of the following: (1) Increase permeable areas by leaving highly porous soil and low-lying area undisturbed by: (a) Incorporating landscaping, green roofs and open space into the project design; Public Works and Engineering Department Prior to the issuance of grading permits and during operation Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 14 (b) Using porous materials for or near driveways, drive aisles, parking stalls and low volume roads and walkways; and (c) Incorporating detention ponds and infiltration pits into the project design. (2) Direct runoff to permeable areas by orienting it away from impermeable areas to swales, berms, green strip filters, gravel beds, rain gardens, pervious pavement or other approved green infrastructure and French drains by: (a) Installing rain-gutters oriented towards permeable areas; (b) Modifying the grade of the property to divert flow to permeable areas and minimize the amount of storm water runoff leaving the property; and (c) Designing curbs, berms, or other structures such that they do not isolate permeable or landscaped areas. (3) Maximize storm water storage for reuse by using retention structures, subsurface areas, cisterns, or other structures to store storm water runoff for reuse or slow release. (4) Rain gardens may be proposed in-lieu of a water quality basin when applicable and approved by the City Engineer. NOISE NOI-1-Construction Noise Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following notes shall be included on grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors. “a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the months of October through May. b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards.

Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 15 c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site. d) Construction equipment staging areas shall be located the greatest distance between the staging area and the nearest sensitive receptors.” PUBLIC SERVICES PPP 4.15-1 The Project applicant shall comply with all applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire prevention and suppression measures relating to water improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire access, access gates, combustible construction, water availability, and fire sprinkler systems.

Fire Department Prior to issuance of a building permit or occupancy permit as determined by the Fire Department PPP 4.15-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, the Project is required to pay a Development Impact Fee that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for public services that would be created by the Project.

Building & Safety Department Per Municipal Code Chapter 3.75 PPP45.15-3 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required development impact fees to the Jurupa Unified School District following protocol for impact fee collection.

Building & Safety Department Prior to the issuance of building permits PPP 4.15-4 & 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008.

Building & Safety Department Prior to the issuance of building permits RECREATION PPP 4.15-4 & 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008 Building & Safety Department Prior to the issuance of building permits TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES TCR-1: Native American Monitoring Agreement: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Permit Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with the Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 16 Consulting Tribe(s) for Native American Monitor(s) to be onsite during ground disturbing activities allowed by the grading permit. A Consulting Tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b). Ground disturbing activities include excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, grading, and trenching. The Monitoring Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, the following provisions: a) Provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice to the Consulting Tribe(s) of all ground disturbing activities. b) In conjunction with the Archaeological Monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measure MM-CR-1 under Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, of the Initial Study for MA21256, the Native American Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources. c) The onsite monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Native American Tribal Monitor(s) have indicated that all upcoming ground disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. The Project Proponent shall submit a fully executed copy of the Monitoring Agreement to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this mitigation measure. If there are multiple Consulting Tribes involved, a separate Monitoring Agreement is required for each. The Monitoring Agreement shall not modify any condition of approval or mitigation measure. complete text of MM TCR-1 shall be placed on the grading plan.

TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery: The Permit Applicant or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of the grading permit. If, during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed: a) Ground disturbing activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. Ground disturbing activities are allowed on the remainder of the Project Site.

Community Development Department Engineering Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the complete text of MM TCR-2 shall be placed on the grading plan.

Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 17 b) In the event the unanticipated discovery includes human remains and/or cremations no photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with written approval by the Consulting Tribes(s). c) The Consulting Tribe(s), the Project Archaeologist (retained by the Permit Applicant under Mitigation Measure MM-CR-1, Retain Professional Archaeologist), of this Initial Study document for MA21256, and the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department shall meet and confer, and discuss the find with respect to the following: 1. Determine if the resource is a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined by Public Resources Code §21074, if so: 2. Determine if the resource is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register on a “Local register of historical or resources” pursuant to Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k); or 3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code § 5024.1 (c) as it pertains to the Consulting Tribe(s): (1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage, (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past, (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values, or (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. d) If the resource(s) are Native American in origin [and not a historical resource as defined by Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k) or §5024.1 (c)], the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Consulting Tribe(s) deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If multiple Consulting Tribes(s) are involved, and a mutual agreement cannot be reached as to the form and manner of disposition of the resource(s), the City shall request input from the Native American Heritage Commission and render a final decision. e) If the resource(s) is both a tribal cultural resource and a historic resource, the Project Archaeologist, the Consulting Tribe(s), and the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department shall meet and confer and discuss the appropriate treatment (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural and historic resource. Treatment, at a minimum, shall be consistent with Public Saddlehorn Ranch Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 18 Resources Code § 21084.3 (b). The appropriate treatment shall be prepared in conjunction with the Archaeological Treatment plan required by Mitigation Measure MM-CR-2 of the Initial Study for MA21256. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until the appropriate treatment has been accomplished. TCR-5: Final Reporting: If a Tribal cultural resource is also a historic resource defined above, the resource shall be included in the Final Report required by Mitigation Measure MM-CR-2 of the Initial Study for MA21256. Community Development Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the complete text of MM TCR-3 shall be placed on the grading plan.

UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS PPP 4.19-1 The Project shall comply with Section 4.408 of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards, which requires new development projects to submit and implement a construction waste management plan in order to reduce the amount of construction waste transported to landfills.

Building & Safety Department Prior to the issuance of building permits

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY, CA LIFORNIA APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38171, AND OVERRULING

THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE
COMMISSION’S DECISION OF INCONSISTENCY TO
PERMIT THE SUBDIVISI ON OF APPROXIMATELY 19.36
GROSS ACRES INTO 31 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS O N THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6550 LIMONITE AVENUE
(SADDLEHORN RANCH)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project.
(a) RC Hobbs Company (the “Applicant”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21008 and Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 (collectively, Master Application No. 21256) to permit the subdivision of 19.36 acres into 31 lots on property located at 6550 Limonite Avenue (APN: 186 -160-021) (the “Project”). The Project also requires an overruling of the Airport Land Use Commission’s (“ALUC”) finding of inconsistency. Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 and the ALUC overrule are the subject matter of this resolution. General Plan Amendment No. 21008 will be considered by separate resolution.

Section 2. Tentative Tract Map.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 a Schedule “A” subdivision to subdivide 19.3 acres into 31 single -family lots, one internal stree t, and one detention basin on the real property located at 6550 Limonite Avenue (APN: 186 -160- 021).
(b) Section 7.05.020 (A) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designated as the “Advisory Agency” charge d with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed tentative Schedule “A” map. Further, Section 7.05.020 (A) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
(c) Section 7.15.150 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is the advisory agency authorized to directly approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative maps.
(d) Section 7.15.130 (A) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that within fifty (50) days after the date of filing of a tract map and commercial parcel map, a public hearing on the map must be held before the Planning Commission. Section 7.15.130 (B) of the -2-

Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the proposed tentative map, file notice of the decision with the City Clerk, and mail notice of the decision to the land divider, or his or her authorized agent, and any interested party requesting a copy. (e) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal C ode requires denial of a Tentative Tract Map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. 7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that th ey will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a ten tative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Section 3. Overruling of Airport Land Use Commission Inconsistency Determination.
(a) The Applicant is seeking the City Council’s overruling of a determination made by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (“ALUC”) that the Project is inconsistent with the 2004 Flabob Airport Land Use Plan (“ALUP”). -3-

(b) Public Utilities Code Section 21676 (b) provides that prior to the amendment of a general plan within the planning boundary established by the Airport Land Use Commission pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21675, a local agency must first refer the proposed action to the Airport Land Use Commission.
(c) Public Utilities Code Section 21676 (b) provides that if the Airport Land Use Commission determines that the proposed action is inconsistent with the Airport Land Use Commission’s plan, the referring agency must be notified. (d) On October 14, 2021, ALUC found the Project inconsistent with ALUP due to the subject site’s location within Compatibility Zones C and D. Zone C limits residential density to 0.2 dwellings per acre and has a 20% open space requirement, and Zone D limits residen tial density from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre with a 10% open space requirement. (e) Public Utilities Code Section 21676 (b) provides that a local agency may, after a public hearing, propose to overrule an Airport Land Use Commission by a two-thirds vote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the proposed action is consistent with the purposes of Article 3.5 of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 9 of the Public Utilities Code as stated in Section 21670.
(f) Public Utilities Code Section 21670 (a) (2) provides that it is the purpose of Article 3.5 to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses.
(g) Public Utilities Code Section 21676 (b) provides that at least forty-five (45) days prior to a decision to overrule an Airport Land Use Commission, the local agency governing body must provide Airport Land Use Commission and the Division of Aeronautics a copy of the proposed decision and findings. The Airport Land Use Commission and the Division of Aeronautics may provide comments to the local agency governing body within thirty (30) days of receiving the proposed decision and findings. If the Airport Land Use Commission’s or the Division of Aeronautics’ comments are not available within this time limit, the local agency governing body may a ct without them. The comments by the Division of Aeronautics or the Airport Land Use Commission are advisory to the local agency governing body. The local agency governing body must include comments from the Commission and the Division of Aeronautics in the public record of any final decision to overrule an Airport Land Use Commission, which may only be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the governing body. (h) On December 28, 2023, the City sent ALUC and the State Department of Transportation (“CALTRANS”) a Notice of Intent to Overrule the Riverside Airport Land Use Commission finding of Inconsistency regarding Development Application MA21256 (GPA21008, TTM38171) for Saddlehorn Ranch (“Notice of Intent”). On or about January 10, 2024, ALUC sent a letter in respon se to the Notice of Intent. On or about January 17, 2024, the California Department of Transportation sent a letter in response to the Notice of Intent. Both of these letters are included in the public record.
-4-

Section 4. Procedural Findings.
(a) The application for the Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted PC Resolution No. 2023-18 recommending that the City Council approve the Project. (c) On February 15, 2024, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 5. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. (a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effect s of the approval of the Project as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) was prepare d by the City in full compliance with CEQA. By separate resolution, the City Council has certified the EIR, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

A copy of that resolution is hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 6. Findings for Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 38697. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 subject to conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit “A” because the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 38171 meets all requirements of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code as set forth below:
(a) The proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans because the proposed General Plan land use designation of Country Neighborhood (LDR) allows for a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre, which will accommodate the proposed Project density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre. Furthermore, the map complies with Title 7 (Subdivisions) and Title 9 (Planning and Zoning), with the approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21008.
(b) The proposed design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with General Plan Land Use Element 2.3 Infrastructure policy to ensure that circulation facilities, water resources, sewer and storm drainage facilities, and other utilities available or provided by the developer are adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources require d to serve existing residents and businesses. All -5-

street improvements, drainage infrastructure, and other utilities are found to be adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses.
(c) The site is physically suitable to accommodate the subdivision as there is adequate water and sewer connections and public services are available to the site. (d) The project is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development in that it proposes 31 single -family residential dwelling units at a density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre, which is below the maximum allowable density under the proposed Country Neighborhood (LDR) General Plan designation.
(e) A tentative tract map may be approved if an EIR was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub.

Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. Here, the City Council will be asked to consider the adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations.
(f) The project has been designed to not conflict with any easements, and does not incorporate any barriers to access or use of the property within the proposed land division.

Section 7. Findings for Overruling of Airport Land Use Commission Inconsistency Determination. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby overrules the determination made by the Riverside County ALUC, dated October 14, 2021, that the proposed Project is inconsistent with the 2004 Flabob ALUP because:
(a) The proposed Project minimizes the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas aro und the Flabob Airport in that t he Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and Title 14 of the Code of Fede ral Regulations, part 77, concerning the proposed construction of 31 homes that will be 21 feet above grade level on Tentative Tract Map No. 38171.

All proposed lots have been issued “No Hazard to Air Navigation” Determination Letters by The Federal Aviation Administration dated January 20, 2023. This analysis determined the proposed structures within the project (single-family homes) do not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation.
(b) The Flabob Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan depicts a portion of the Project being located within the 55 -60 Community Noise Equivalent Level (“CNEL”) contour range from aircraft noise, and a portion outside the 55 CNEL contour range. Single-family residences are 'marginally acceptable' in this noise contour. The proposed homes would be affected by aircraft generated noise. However, standard construction is normally considered to provide for a 15 dB reduction from exterior noise levels. A condition of approval has been included to incorporate noise attenuation measures into the design of the homes to such extent as may be required to ensure that interior noise levels from aircraft operations are at or below 45 CNEL, which is acceptable for single-family homes.
-6-

(c) The area adjacent to the subject prop erty is primarily residential. The area in between Flabob Airport and the Project site is open space near Flabob Airport and predominately residential thereafter. The area to the east of the Project site is open space and the Santa Ana River. The open space near Flabob Airport, combined with the large undeveloped space along the Santa Ana River provides an unusually large area in case an aircraft suffering a catastrophic failure requires an emergency landing location. The proposed Project does not, in any way, diminish this opportunity. The surrounding area is already devoted to residential densities incompatible with the ALUP. Implementation of the required contiguous open space area which would be 3.65 acres of the 19 acre project site creates a hardship for the project as residential subdivisions immediately surrounding the project site do not contain open space areas consistent with the ALUC open space requirements.
(d) Any measures that would effectively mitigate the impacts of the proposed Project regarding consistency with the Flabob ALUP density and open space requirements would require a reduction of residential units in the Project. County Wide Policy 3.3.1 (Infill) allows for greater densities than would otherwise be permitted in Zones C and D but cap s the densities at double the allowable density for the zone. Doubling the density increases the limit from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre for Zone C, and from 0.2 to 0.4 dwelling units per acre (on the low end), and from 5.0 to 10.0 dwelling units per acre (on the high end) for Zone D. Under the ALUP doubled density provision, only 7 units would be allowed in Zone C under the 0.4 du/acre, and 6 units in Zone D under the 10 du/acre allowable density. The maximum number of units under the ALUP would only permit up to 13 units, therefore the Project is inconsistent if developed within the ALUP density requirements. No feasible mitigation is available to eliminate the identified inconsistency of the Project with the Flabob ALUP, related to density or open space. Despite the inconsistency with the ALUP, the proposed 31 homes at a density of 1.6 dwelling units per ac re has been issued “No Hazard to Air Navigation: Determination Letters by The Federal Aviation Administration dated January 20, 2023. This analysis determined the proposed structures within the project (single family homes) do not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation. Further, the Aeronautical Obstruction Evaluation Study prepared by Allen Aviation (Allen Aviat ion Report) for the Project concluded the buildings in the Project, as proposed, would not infringe on the imaginary surfaces of the navigable airspace or other safety criteria established for the Flabob Airport. Taken together, the Allen Aviation Report a nd FAA Determination Letters as well as the open space near Flabob Airport, combined with the large undeveloped space along the Santa Ana River demonstrate the Project would not result in significant risks to airport operations or safety, or a significant risk to public health or safety.

Section 8. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 15th day of February 2024.

______________________________
Guillermo Silva
Mayor
-7-

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023-06 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 15th day of February 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 15th day of February 2024.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

Exhibit A

Conditions of Approval

SADDLEHORN RANCH MA21256 (GPA21008 and TTM38171)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

Page 1 of 19 ends
← All documents from this meeting