Agenda — Jurupa Valley City Council, December 19, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

Page - 1 -

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, December 19, 2024
Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

1. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Guillermo Silva, Mayor
● Brian Berkson, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Chris Barajas, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

2. INSTALLATION OF NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS
A. CERTIFICATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 5, 2024
Requested Action: That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2024-128, entitled:

A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.

B. A member of the public who wishes to sp eak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.

C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.

Page - 2 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACTS O F THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 5, 2024 DECLARING THE

RESULTS THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY
LAW
B. OATHS OF OFFICE AND PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF

ELECTION TO NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS

3. PRESENTATIONS
A. RECOGNITION TO OUTGOING MAYOR GUILLERMO SILVA
B. RECOGNITON TO OUTGOING COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE

ALTAMIRANO

4. COMMUNITY RECEPTION
Members of the audience are invited to join the newly elected City Council Members for a brief community reception.

Following the reception, Mayor Guillermo Silva and Council Member-Elect Veronica Sanchez will take their seats at the dais.

5. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2013-01, the City Council shall select from among its members a Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem to serve for the following year. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem shall take office on January 1 of each year. The term of office for the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tem shall be a calendar year from January 1 through December 31.

A. ELECTION OF MAYOR
Requested Action: That the City Council nominate and elect one of its members to serve as Mayor for a term expiring December 31, 2025.

B. ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM
Requested Action: That the City Council nominate and elect one of its members to serve as Mayor Pro Tem for a term expiring December 31, 2025.

6. INVOCATION

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

8. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Page - 3 -

9. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

10. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

11. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR PRO TEM BRIAN BERKSON

1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2024

2. UPDATE ON THE METROL INK/SOUTHERN CALIFOR NIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHOR ITY MEETING OF DECEM BER 13,
2024

3. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY MEETING OF
DECEMBER 19, 2024
B. COUNCIL MEMBER CHRIS BARAJAS

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF

GOVERNMENTS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING OF
DECEMBER 2, 2024

2. UPDATE ON THE WESTER N RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS – ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2024

12. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
A. AB1234 REPORT
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.

Page - 4 -

13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. NOVEMBER 21, 2024 REGULAR MEETING

14. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.

COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY REMOVE ITEMS FROM TH E CONSENT

CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION, OR TO ASK QUESTIONS, OR MAKE A

COMMENT ON THE ITEM
If a Council Member wishes to vote “no” or “abstain” on a Consent Calendar item but does not wish to discuss, ask questions or make a comment, the Council Member may state that they wish to vote “no” or “abstain” on the item and the minutes and certification of the vote will show that the Council Member voted “no” or “abstain.”
B. ORDINANCE NO. 2024-27
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2024-27, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTICT NO. PS 2024 -010 (PUBLIC SAFETY, VALLEY

SQUARE) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
C. ORDINANCE NO. 2024-28
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2024-28, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 24002 TO REZONE 3.55 ACRES LOCATED AT 4651 BROOKHOLLOW CIRCLE
(APN 167 -161-020) FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (I -P) AND
Page - 5 -

MANUFACTURING-SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M -SC) TO BUSINESS

PARK (BP), AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
D. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$3,974,817.69
Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated October 24, 31, and November 4, 7 and 14, 2024 as well as the payroll registers dated October 31, and November 8, 2024.

E. APPROVAL OF CITY HOLIDAY SCHEDULE
Requested Action: That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2024- 129, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING HOLIDAYS ON WHICH CITY
OFFICES SHALL BE CLOSED FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2025
F. APPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND STC TRAFFIC, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

SERVICES FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION
AND SIGNAL HEAD UPGRADES (CIP NO. 21112)
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc. of Carlsbad, California (Consultant) for Construction Management and Construction Inspections (CM/CI) Services in the amount of $263,630 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Upgrades (CIP No. 21112) and $132,200 for signal timing se rvices for a not -to- exceed amount of $395,830.

G. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CROSSTOWN
ELECTRICAL & DATA, INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SIGNAL HEAD UPGRADES (CIP NO. 21112)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council award a con struction contract to Crosstown Electrical & Data, Inc. in the amount of $1,865,590 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination.

2. Approve a project contingency in the amount of $186,559 (10% of bid amount).

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the a greement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

Page - 6 -
H. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF-STORAGE) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE

LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -012 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE); GENERALLY LOCATED AT

THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLAY STREET AND GENERAL ROAD
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-130, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF-STORAGE) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE

LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -012 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE)
I. AWARD TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT CONTRAC T TO
SWARCO MCCAIN INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL

COORDINATION AND SIGNAL HEAD UPGRADES (EQUIPMENT) (CIP
#21112)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council award a traffic equipment procurement contract to Swarco McCain Inc. in the amount of $421,682.74 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination (Equipment).

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

J. APPROVAL OF TRACT MA P NO. 38171 COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES

LOCATED EAST OF LIMONITE AVENUE FRONTAGE ROAD AND WEST

OF RIVERVIEW DRIVE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION,

APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF

IMPROVEMENT BONDS

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 38171 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for public street and utility purposes for Lot “A” (Saddlehorn Lane) and Lot “B” (Riverview Drive).

Page - 7 -
b. Accept the real property described as a storm dr ain easement for public purposes.
c. Accept the reciprocal access easement for ingress, egress and emergency vehicle access.
d. Accept Lot 32 for infiltration basin, water quality and open space purposes.

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38171

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off-site improvements and survey monumentation.

K. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR

BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES
Requested Action: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the consultant services agreement with Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. for Building Official Services in the Community Development Department.

L. APPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND TKE ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES FOR THE 2023-2024 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
PROJECT (CIP #23105)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and TKE Engineering, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for a not -to-exceed amount of $164,307.00 for the Citywide Paving Rehabilitation Project (CIP #23105); and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent related minor amendments to the Agreement with TKE Engineering, Inc., up to 10% as contingency to cover the cost of any unforeseen conditions; and

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make appropriate budgetary adjustments as necessary.

Page - 8 -
M. AWARD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO HARDY AND HARPER, INC.

FOR THE 2023 -2024 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (CIP #23105)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council a ward a construction contract to Hardy and Harper Inc. in the amount of $ 2,757,000.00 for the Citywide Paving Rehabilitation Project.

2. Approve a project contingency in the amount of $275,700 (10% of bid amount) for unforeseen conditions.

3. Allocate funds for the Project in the amount $1,720,936.58 from American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), as outlined in the Table A in the financial impact section.

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

5. Authorize the Finance Director to make any appropriate budgetary changes.

15. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 24282: A SECOND ONE -YEAR EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM37256EOT2) NO. 37256 AND A ONE -YEAR EXTENSION FOR THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP16043EOT2), EXTENDING
THE EXPIRATION DATE FROM OCTOBER 29, 2024 TO OCTOBER 29, 2025 AND DETERMINING THAT NO ADDITIONAL CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162; LOCATION:

NORTHEAST CORNER OF MISSION BOULEV ARD AND CRESTMORE
ROAD (APNS: 179 -330-002, 003, 004, 005 & 006); (APPLICANT:

NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION)
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and adopt Resolution No. 2024-131, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

V ALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND ONE -YEAR
EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM37256EOT2) NO.
37256 AND A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION FOR THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP16043EOT2), EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE TO OCTOBER 29, 2025; AND DETERMINING THAT NO ADDITIONAL
Page - 9 -

CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15162
B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING MASTER APPLICATION 24322
(MA24322) AND CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22005 (CZ22005) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.06 ACRES IN SIZE LOCA TED AT THE

SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA RUE STREET AND CANAL STREET
(APN 179 -021-001) FROM R -1 (ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO R -3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF

EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMEN T CODE SECTIONS
65852.21(J) AND 66411.7(N) AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15061(B)(3)
Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing and continue the public hearing to a future unspecified date to allow additional time to prepare the staff report.

17. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES TO

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMITTEES

1. Requested Action: That the City Council consider appointments to the following Boards and/or Committees for the 2025 calendar year:
a. Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District (2-year term) b. Public Entity Risk Management Authority (PERMA)
c. Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
d. Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
e. Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
f. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA)
g. City Events Committee
h. Legislative Ad Hoc Committee

2. That the City Council approve travel and/or reimbursement of expenses to attend upcoming conferences for the 2025 Calendar Year.

18. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
A. REVIEW AND DISCUSSIO N OF MUNICIPAL CODES AND

REGULATIONS RELATED TO ANIMAL KEEPING IN RESIDENTIAL

ZONES (COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO CARMONA)
Page - 10 -

19. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

20. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

21. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL LITIGATION.

The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2).(3) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on exi sting facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City with respect to the proposed project at 7586 Jurupa Road based on four letters concerning the Project: 1) October 7, 2024 from Linda Klein, attorney for Warmin gton Residential to Assistant City Attorney Maricela Marroquin; 2) November 27, 2024 from Sonja Trauss, Executive Director, YIMBY Law to Planning Commission; 3) December 5, 2024 from , Dylan Casey, Executive Director, and James Lloyd, Director of Planning and Investigations, California Housing Defense Fund; and 4) December 11, 2024 from Linda Klein, attorney for Warmington Residential to Planning Commission. The four letters are available for public inspection from the Office of the City Clerk.

22. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS IN CLOSED

SESSION

23. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of January 16, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agendas of public meetings and any other w ritings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hour s prior to a public meeting, the writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org. Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.A

CERTIFICATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE CONSOLIDATED
GENERAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 5, 2024

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2024-128, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACTS OF THE CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 20 24 DECLARING THE RESULTS

THEROF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
BACKGROUND:

On Tuesday, November 5, 2024, a Consolidated General Election was held in the City of Jurupa Valley for the purpose of electing Council Members to Council Districts 2 and 4.

On December 5, 202 4, the Riverside County Registrar of Voters completed the final canvass of the returns and certified the official statement of results of the election as follows:

The Statement of Votes cast shows that Guillermo “Willy” Silva was elected to Council District 2 for a full term of four years and Veronica Sanchez was elected to Council District 4 for a full term of four years.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

Pursuant to California Elections Code § 10263 (b) the city elections official, upon receipt of the results of the election from the elections official conducting the election, shall certify the results to the governing body which shall, no later than the next regularly scheduled city council meeting following presentation of the 28 -day canvass of the returns, or at a special meeting called for this purpose, comply with the applicable provisions of Section 10263. The subject resolution includes the official canvass of the election which is attached to and referenced as Exhibit “A.”
As required by AB 813, the certified statement of the results of the election will be posted on the City’s website.

RECOUNT
Following the Registrar of Voters’ certification of the election results on December 5, 2024, a requested manual recount for Council District 2 was made by a supporter of Lisa Lane. The results of the recount are shown on the attached spreadsheet, which was completed by the Riverside County Registrar of Voters on December 16, 2024. The final recount results show that Guillermo “Willy” Silva defeated Lisa Lane by 14 votes.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact associated with this Council Action.

*****************************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *************************

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-128

A RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE

FACTS OF THE CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION
HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 20 24 DECLARING THE

RESULTS THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTE RS AS

PROVIDED BY LAW

WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Jurupa Valley on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in the time, form and manner as provided by law; that candidates were nominated to fill the vacancy or vacancies as provided by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects, the election was held and conducted and the ballots were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in the time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2024-72 adopted June 27, 2024 , the Riverside County Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has submitted the Certificate of Facts, attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit “A.”

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows:

CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNCIL DISTRICT 2

Lisa Lane
Tyler L. Byrne
Guillermo “Willy” Silva
Emmanuel Suarez

CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNCIL DISTRICT 4

Leslie Altamirano
Anthony Kelly, Jr.

Veronica Sanchez

Section 2. That the number of votes given to each of the persons above named in Section 1 for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates are documented in Exhibit “A”, attached.

Section 3. The City Council does declare and determine that, as a result of the election:

-2-
1) Guillermo “Willy” Silva was elected as a member of the City Council in Council District 2 for the full term of four years.

2) Veronica Sanchez was elected as a member of the City Council in Council District 4 for the full term of four years.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, a statement of the results of the election, showing: 1) the whole number of ballots cast in the City of Jurupa Valley; 2) the names of the persons voted for; 3) the total number of votes given to each person; 4) the name of any measures voted for; and (3) the number of votes given at each precinct.

Section 5. That the City Clerk shall immediately sign and deliver to each person elected a Certificate of Election and shall also administer to each person elected the oath of office prescribed in the California Constitution. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of December 2024.

______________________________
Guillermo Silva
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-3-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024-128 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of December 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of December 2024.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF THE ELECTION

1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
1111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Lisa Lane
Tyler L.

SB)
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5632 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
1111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Lisa Lane
Tyler L.

Byrne
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva
Emmanuel
Suarez
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
St Bd of Equalization 4 (Por.

SB, SD, Org and Imp)
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Riverside County Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612 202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - County
Board of Education Districts
sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Riverside Community College
Dist
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Community
College Districts sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5633 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
1111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Lisa Lane
Tyler L.

Byrne
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva
Emmanuel
Suarez
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
Jurupa Unified School District Total 9305 6535 70.23 % 2631 660 2259 443 202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Unified
School Districts
Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
Jurupa Unified School District
Trustee Area 2
Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Unified
School Districts sub-district
Total 11478 8053 70.16 % 2944 857 2942 584
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Union High
School Districts sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5634 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
1111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Lisa Lane
Tyler L.

Byrne
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva
Emmanuel
Suarez
Unincorporated - Elementary
School Districts
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Elementary
School Districts sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
2nd Supervisorial District Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612 202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
City of Jurupa Valley Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612 202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
City of Jurupa Valley Council
District #2
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5635 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
1111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Lisa Lane
Tyler L.

Byrne
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva
Emmanuel
Suarez
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated -
Unincorporated
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Health Care
Districts
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Health Care
Districts sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Recreation &
Parks Districts
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
Jurupa Area Recreation and
Park District Div. 2
Total 3273 2120 64.77 % 743 256 737 187
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5636 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
1111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Lisa Lane
Tyler L.

Byrne
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva
Emmanuel
Suarez
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202112 Total 0 0
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Jurupa Area Recreation and
Park District Div. 3
Total 7071 4764 67.37 % 1862 489 1720 309
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
Unincorporated - Recreation &
Parks Districts sub-district
Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Irrigation
Districts
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Sanitary
Districts sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - Water
Agencies sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5637 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
1111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Lisa Lane
Tyler L.

Byrne
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva
Emmanuel
Suarez
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - County
Water Districts
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - County
Water Districts sub-district
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Western Municipal Water
District, Div. 4
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
202100 Total 6 5 83.33 % *** *** *** ***
202103 Total 1847 1473 79.75 % 446 136 610 116
202111 Total 2560 1816 70.94 % 636 232 612 159
202112 Total 0 0
202115 Total 713 304 42.64 % 107 24 125 28
202121 Total 4179 2937 70.28 % 1438 268 912 139
202124 Total 2886 1822 63.13 % 420 221 808 169
Unincorporated - California
Water Districts
Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
Contest Total 12191 8357 68.55 % 3051 881 3067 612
*** Indicates vote data was suppressed due to voter privacy settings.

Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5638 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
CALIFORNIA Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
39th Congressional District Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034 104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
31st Senatorial District (Por.

SB)
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5639 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
58th Assembly District (Por.

SB, SD, Org and Imp)
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Riverside County Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - County
Board of Education Districts
sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5640 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Riverside Community College
Dist
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Community
College Districts sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Jurupa Unified School District Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034 104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
Jurupa Unified School District
Trustee Area 4
Total 5690 2779 48.84 % 901 503 1104
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5641 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Unified
School Districts sub-district
Total 3644 2216 60.81 % 806 291 930
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Union High
School Districts sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Elementary
School Districts
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5642 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
Unincorporated - Elementary
School Districts sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
1st Supervisorial District Total 8754 4605 52.60 % 1592 743 1844 204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
2nd Supervisorial District Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190 104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
City of Jurupa Valley Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034 104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
City of Jurupa Valley Council
District #4
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5643 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated -
Unincorporated
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Health Care
Districts
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Health Care
Districts sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5644 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Recreation &
Parks Districts
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Recreation &
Parks Districts sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Irrigation
Districts
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Sanitary
Districts sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5645 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - Water
Agencies sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - County
Water Districts
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - County
Water Districts sub-district
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5646 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
1 Jurupa Valley City Council, Council
District 4
111
Registered
Voters
Voters Cast
Turnout (%)
Leslie
Altamirano
Anthony
Kelly, Jr
Veronica
Sanchez
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Western Municipal Water
District, Div. 4
Total 9142 4897 53.57 % 1666 778 2003
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
Unincorporated - Municipal
Water Districts sub-district
Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104103 Total 192 98 51.04 % 41 16 31
104105 Total 18 11 61.11 % 2 1 5
104108 Total 0 0
104109 Total 1850 1141 61.68 % 392 147 492
104115 Total 743 446 60.03 % 213 56 158
104116 Total 1283 619 48.25 % 191 121 262
104121 Total 3195 1562 48.89 % 518 277 606
104124 Total 279 141 50.54 % 45 21 59
104125 Total 1194 587 49.16 % 190 104 231
204100 Total 580 390 67.24 % 115 51 190
Unincorporated - California
Water Districts
Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
Contest Total 9334 4995 53.51 % 1707 794 2034
*** Indicates vote data was suppressed due to voter privacy settings.

Printed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:38 PM Page 5647 of 10925Data Refreshed: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:33 PM Riverside
Riverside 2024 General Election
SOV
November 5, 2024
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva Lisa Lane Tyler L. Byrne Emmanuel
Suarez
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva Lisa Lane Tyler L. Byrne Emmanuel
Suarez
Guillermo
"Willy" Silva Lisa Lane Tyler L. Byrne Emmanuel
Suarez
202100 - Mail Ballot 12/11/2024 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 202103 - VBM 12/11/2024 509 364 110 92 510 365 109 91 1 1 -1 -1 202111 - VBM 12/12/2024 517 555 192 128 518 555 192 128 1 0 0 0 202112 - Mail Ballot 12/11/2024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202115 - VBM 12/11/2024 101 91 15 23 101 91 15 23 0 0 0 0 202121 - VBM 12/12/2024 788 1224 226 97 788 1224 227 97 0 0 1 0 202124 - VBM 12/12/2024 653 348 179 133 652 349 177 133 -1 1 -2 0 Vote Center 12/16/2024 392 393 120 99 396 397 122 100 4 4 2 1 CVR 12/16/2024 107 72 39 39 102 68 36 38 -5 -4 -3 -1
3067 3051 881 612 3067 3053 878 611 0 2 -3 -1
Final Recount Results 12/16/2024
TOTALS:

Jurupa Valley City Council, Council District 2
Counting Group RECOUNT DATE
CERTIFIED RESULTS RECOUNT RESULTS DIFFERENCE (+/-)

AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.A
-1-

MINUTES

OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
November 21, 2024

1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR STUDY SESSION ● Guillermo Silva, Mayor
● Brian Berkson, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Chris Barajas, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
Mayor Guillermo Silva called the Study Session to order at 6:00 p.m. Council Member Leslie Altamirano and Council Member Chris Barajas were absent.

2. STUDY SESSION
A. REGULATIONS FOR METAL SHIPPING CONTAINERS
Staff Report presented by Miguel Del Rio, Principal Planner.

Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson stated that the current municipal code regulations are overly restrictive. His goal is to have a discussion about allowing cargo/shipping containers to be utilized as accessory storage as long as they meet minimum setback and design standards.

Joe Perez, Assistant City Manager/Director of Community Development provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.

Following discussion, the City Council identified items of concerns and requests for additional information. The Council requested that this item be brought back for future Council action.

Mayor Guillermo Silva adjourned the study session at 6:47 p.m.

3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Guillermo Silva, Mayor
● Brian Berkson, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Chris Barajas, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
Mayor Guillermo Silva called the regular meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.

RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-

4. INVOCATION was given by Pastor Todd Dannelly, Calvary Chapel Jurupa Valley.

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by City Manager Rod Butler.

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Guillermo Silva announced that Item 13.M would be moved from the Consent Calendar to Council Business and Items 13.H and 16.B will be pulled from the Agenda.

A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, approve the Agenda with the noted changes.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

7. PRESENTATIONS
A. UPDATE ON JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT
PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS – PRESENTED BY COLBY DIUGUID,

GENERAL MANAGER
Colby Diuguid, General Manager, gave an update on the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District’s projects and programs. He announced that the JARPD adopted their Park and Recreation Master Plan on September 26, 2024 and it is available on their website. He gave an update on the Trails Master Plan, identifying key routes and costs. He gave an update on several construction projects, park renovations, and special events.

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
There were no public comments.

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no Council comments.

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR GUILLERMO SILVA

1. Mayor Guillermo Silva reported that he was unable to attend the Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District meeting of November 21, 2024, due to a scheduling conflict.
-3-

2. Mayor Guillermo Silva gave an update on the Interagency Coordinating Council meeting of November 15, 2024.

B. MAYOR PRO TEM BRIAN BERKSON

1. Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority meeting of November 8, 2024.

2. Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission meeting of November 13, 2024.

3. Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson gave an update on the Northwes t Transportation Now Coalition meeting of November 14, 2024.

4. Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors meeting of November 21, 2024.

5. Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson announced that he was unable to attend the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee meeting of November 21, 2024, due to a scheduling conflict.

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
City Manager Rod Butler announced that the annual City Hall Tree Lighting Ceremony is Wednesday, December 4 beginning at 5:30 p.m. The event features photos with Santa Claus, entertainment, and holiday treats. He reported that City Hall will be closed on Monday, November 11, 2024 in observance of Veterans Day. He announced that City Hall will close early on the day before Thanksgiving at 12:30 p.m. City Hall will also be closed on Thursday, November 28 and 29, 2024 in observance of the Thanksgiving Day holiday.

Mr. Butler provided an election update on Measure CC, which provides funding for a new technology trade center in Jurupa Valley. He noted that the measure is trending very well and is poised to pass. He thanked the voters in the Riverside Community College District for supporting the measure. Mr. Butle r asked Michael Flad to provide an update on Proposition 4, which will provide significant funding for the Santa Ana River.

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. NOVEMBER 7, 2024 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Minutes of the regular meeting of November 7, 2024.
-4-
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

13. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN

THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.

COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY REMOVE ITEMS FROM TH E CONSEN T

CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION, OR TO ASK QUESTIONS, OR MAKE A

COMMENT ON THE ITEM
If a Council Member wishes to vote “no” or “abstain” on a Consent Calendar item but does not wish to discuss, ask questions or make a comment, the Council Member may state that they wish to vote “no” or “abstain” on the item and the minutes and certification of the vote will show that the Council Member voted “no” or “abstain.”
B. ORDINANCE NO. 2024-24
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2024-24, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTICT NO. PS 2024 -003 (PUBLIC SAFETY, MISSION

VILLAGE) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
C. ORDINANCE NO. 2024-25
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2024-25, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 22003

FROM MANUFACTURING SERVICE COMMERCIAL (M -SC) TO
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL (R-3) FOR TWO PARCELS (APNS 177-110-018 AND 177 -110-016) OF APPROXIMATELY 24.04 ACRES IN SIZE
LOCATED AT 6464 33RD STREET AND FINDING NO FURTHER
-5-

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT SECTION 15162
D. ORDINANCE NO. 2024-26
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2024-26, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21007
FROM LIGHT AGRICULTURE A-1-4 (MIN. 4-ACRE LOT PER UNIT) TO LIGHT AGRICULTURE A -1 (MIN. 20,000 S.F. LOT PER UNIT) TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIX (6) SINGLE -FAMILY
HOMES ON A 4.1-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 9045 56TH STREET – “VIA VERDE ESTATES” (APNS: 165-040-018, AND -019)
E. APPROVAL OF DIGITAL DISPLAY AGREEMENTS AND LEASE

AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND
LAMAR CENTRAL OUTDOOR, LLC – REMOVED FROM THE

CONSENT CALENDAR FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-117, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY APPROVING DIGITAL DISPLAY AGREEMENTS AND LEASE

AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND

LAMAR CENTRAL OUTDOOR, LLC, AND DETERMINING THAT THE

AGREEMENTS ARE EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION
15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES
F. RESOLUTION APPROV ING AGREEMENT WITH T HE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP ORTATION FOR FREIGHT ANALYSIS

AND OTHER GRANT AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-118, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR

HIS DESIGNEE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, TO EXECUTE

AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION
-6-
G. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-001 (SEQUANOTA

HEIGHTS) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX

WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS); GENERALY

LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CANAL STREET AND

OPAL STREET
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-119, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001 (SEQUANOTA

HEIGHTS) AND TO AUTHORIZE T HE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX

WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2023-001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS)
H. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF

TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED
(THE “DISTRICT”) AS (ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE)) AND

THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY; LOC ATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VAN
BUREN BOULEVARD AND RUTILE STREET – REMOVED FROM THE
AGENDA
I. AGREEMENT BETWEEN TH E CITY OF JURUPA VAL LEY AND
SMARTSHEET INC. FOR THE CREATION AND IMP LEMENTATION

OF A CAPITAL IMPROVE MENT PROGRAM (CIP) PROJECT

MANAGEMENT SOLUTION

1. That the City Council approve the agreement with Smartsheet Inc. (“Smartsheet”) for the creation and implementation of a Capital Improvement Program project management solution for an amount not to exceed $36,598; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to sign the Smartsheet User Agreement; and

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make appropriate budget adjustments as necessary.
-7-
J. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND

REACH OUT FOR PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC BICYCLES AND
EQUIPMENT FOR USE BY THE J URUPA VALLEY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Reach Out and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

K. APPROVAL TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR 2024 TREE CITY USA

DESIGNATION THROUGH THE ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the submittal of an application for 2024 Tree City USA designation through the Arbor Day Foundation; and

2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the 2024 Tree City USA application.

L. ADOPT RESOLUTION APP ROVING SUMMARY VACAT ION AS
SHOWN ON EXHIBITS “A , B AND C” OF THE ST AFF REPORT TO

ACCOMMODATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS

AS PART OF THE GRADE S EPARATION CROSSING P ROJECT ON

JURUPA ROAD
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-123, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF

THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE

CONSTRUCTION OF THE GRADE SEPARATION CROSSING PROJECT

ON JURUPA ROAD IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
M. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPING PERMIT -READY PLANS FOR
BARNS, STORAGE SHEDS , AND ANIMAL STALLS; UPDATING
DETACHED PATIO COVER STANDARDS; AND CREATING FILLABLE
PDF FOR PRADU PLANS – MOVED TO COUNCIL BUSINESS
N. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION
OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) FOR REAP 2.0 SUSTAINABLE

COMMUNITIES PROGRAM (SCP) - CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, EQUITY,

AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE GRANT
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-127, entitled:
-8-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS FOR REAP 2.0

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM - CIVIC ENGAGEMENT,

EQUITY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE GRANT AND

DETERMINING THAT THE AGREEMENT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA
UNDER SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES
O. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 (first quarter of Fiscal Year 2024- 2025).

A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 13.E , which was removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

13.E APPROVAL OF DIGITAL DISPLAY AGREEMENTS AND LEASE

AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND

LAMAR CENTRAL OUTDOOR, LLC
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that Item 13.E be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.

Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.

Further discussion followed.

Brian S mith, Director of Real Estate, Lamar Outdoor Advertising, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions. -9-
A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-117, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY APPROVING DIGITAL DISPLAY AGREEMENTS AND LEASE

AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND

LAMAR CENTRAL OUTDOOR, LLC, AND DETERMINING THAT THE

AGREEMENTS ARE EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION
15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION; DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTION; AND APPROVING

FORMATION AND LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -010
(PUBLIC SAFETY, VALLEY SQUARE) GENERALLY LOCATED AT

THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MISSION BOULEVARD AND PYRITE
AVENUE
Staff Report presented by Paul Toor, Director of Public Works. Mr. Toor outlined the process for the establishment and levy of special taxes for City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-010 (Public Safety, Valley Square).

Mayor Guillermo Silva opened the public hearing.

There being no further comments, Mayor Guillermo Silva closed the public hearing.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, seconded by Council Member Chris Barajas, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2024 -124 and 2024 -125, entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -124 – A RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITEIS DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -010 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, VALLEY SQUARE), TO ESTABLISH AN APPROPRIATIONS

LIMIT THEREFORE, TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX

THEREIN, AND TO SUBMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN
-10-

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO
THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF; AND
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-125 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CALLING A

SPECIAL ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED

ELECTORS OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -010 (PUBLIC SAFETY, VALLEY SQUARE)

PROPOSITIONS REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL

TAX WITHIN THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
At the request of the mayor, the City Clerk announced that one owner cast one ballot. All votes cast were in favor of the special taxes.

A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-126, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL

ELECTION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-010 (PUBLIC SAFETY, VALLEY SQUARE) AND

DIRECTING THE RECORDING OF A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, to introduce Ordinance No. 2024-27, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTICT NO. P S 2024 -010 (PUBLIC SAFETY, VALLEY

SQUARE) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
-11-
B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CHANGE OF ZONE (CZ24002) CONSISTING OF 3.5 5 ACRES LOCATED AT 4651 BROOKHOLLOW
CIRCLE (APN: 167 -161-020) AND DETERMINE THAT NO FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
Staff Report presented by Rene Aguilar, Associate Planner. Mr. Aguilar reported that on September 7, 2006, the County of Riverside approved Plot Plan 21040 for the construction of a business park. As the current zoning is not consistent with the Business Park land use designation, the City Council, at their April 4, 2024 meeting, initiated a Change of Zone to address the zoning inconsistency.

Mayor Guillermo Silva opened the public hearing.

There being no further comments, Mayor Guillermo Silva closed the public hearing.

A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona, to introduce Ordinance No. 2024-28, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 24002 TO REZONE 3.55 ACRES LOCATED AT 465 1 BROOKHOLLOW CIRCLE (APN 167-161- 020) FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (I -P) AND MANU FACTURING-

SERVICE COMMERCIAL ( M-SC) TO BUSINESS PA RK (BP), AND

DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT F ROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONME NTAL QUALITY ACT PUR SUANT TO
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

16. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR PROHOUSING DESIGNATION

THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HO USING AND

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD)
Staff Report presented by Curtis Miller, Housing Manager. Mr. Miller provided an overview of the Pathway to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation Program otherwise known as prohousing. Mr. Miller reported the goal of the program is to increase housing opportunities and address the state’s current housing crisis.

Further discussion followed.
-12-
Council Member Armando Carmona questioned the scoring metrics and how that measurement is related to zoning in residential areas.

Council Member Leslie Altamirano stepped away from the dais at 7:59 p.m.

A motion was made by Council Member Chris Barajas , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, to authorize the preparation of an application for the Prohousing Designation through the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, G. Silva
Noes: A. Carmona

Absent: L. Altamirano
Council Member Leslie Altamirano returned to the dais at 8:03 p.m.

B. INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND A SPECIFIC

PLAN AMENDMENT FOR DISTRICT AT JURUPA VALLEY REVISING
THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE “COMMERCIAL RETAIL --
INTEGRATED USE OVERLAY” – REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA AT

THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT
C. CONSIDERATION OF DEV ELOPING PERMIT -READY PLANS FOR BARNS, STORAGE SHEDS , AND ANIMAL STALLS; UPDATING
DETACHED PATIO COVER STANDARDS; AND CREATING FILLABLE

PDF FOR PRADU PLANS
Staff Report presented by Jim Pechous, Principal Planner . Mr. Pechous reported that at the request of Council, City staff were directed to provide data on eligible lots for permit-ready plans with a focus on streamlining construction of accessory structures in the equestrian protection overlay. Mr. Pechous presented the results of the eligibility analy sis and provided examples of permit -ready barns, horse stables, and storage buildings. Mr. Pechous indicated that staff included updated plans for patio covers to meet current building code requirements.

Further discussion followed.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Brian Berkson, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano , to proceed with the development of proposed permit-ready (pre-approved) accessory building plans and other updates as outlined in the staff report.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
-13-

17. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
There were no requests for future Agenda items.

18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.

19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
There were no additional Council comments.

20. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Guillermo Silva announced that Closed Session Item 20.C would be rescheduled to the December 5, 2024 meeting.

A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
There were no public comments regarding the closed session items.

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL LITIGATION.

The City Council met in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (4) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on the discussions with several local residents in the area of Jurupa Road around Valley Way and Soto Avenue concerning drainage issues during the rainy season. The residents include Rosa Sandoval, Jay Lossing, Vanessa Arias, Arturo Acosta, and Holly Pagner. The correspondence, videos and pictures submitted by the residents describing the facts and circumstances on which their concerns are based are available for public inspection from the Office of the City Clerk.

21. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF A NY REPORTABLE ACTION S IN CLOSED

SESSION
The City Attorney announced that there were no reportable actions taken.

22. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Guillermo Silva adjourned the meeting at 8:37 p.m. to December 5, 2024 at 7:00 pm. -14-
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.B
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-27

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-010 (PUBLIC SAFETY, VALLEY

SQUARE) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
RECITALS:

WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (the "City Council"), has previously adopted Resolution No. 2024-109 entitled "Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-010 (Public Safety, Valley Square) and to authorize the levy of a Special Tax within City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024 -010 (Public Safety, Valley Square)" (the "Resolution of Intention"), stating its intention to conduct proceedings to form City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-010 (Public Safety, Valley Square) (the "CFD") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the "Act") to finance certain services (the "Services") including incidental expenses, to serve the CFD; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set November 21, 2024, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practical, as the date of a public hearing on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax within the CFD (the "Rate and Method"); and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was published and mailed to all landowners proposed to be included in the CFD in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, at the pub lic hearing, evidence was presented to the City Council on such matters before it, including a special report (the “Report”) describing the services necessary to adequately meet the needs of the CFD and the estimated costs of financing such Services as required by Section 53321.5 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the Rate and Method were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of Formation of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-010 (Public Safety, Valley Square), to Establish an Appropriations Limit therefor, to Authorize the Submittal of the Levy of Special Taxes, and to Submit the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit, to the Qualified Electors of such Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution of Formation”) which established the CFD and authorized the levy of a special tax within the CFD; and

RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council also adopted a resolution entitled: "Resolution of the City Council of the Ci ty of Jurupa Valley Calling a Special Election and Submitting to the Qualified Electors of City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-010 (Public Safety, Valley Square) Propositions Regarding the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit and the Annual Levy of a Special Tax Within the Community Facilities District" (the "Resolution Calling Election") which called a special election of the qualified electors within the CFD; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Resolution Calling Election, an election was held in which qualified electors of the CFD approved the establishment of an appropriations limit for the CFD and the levy of a special tax (the "Special Tax") within the CFD; and WHEREAS, on November 21 , 2024, the City Council adop ted a resolution entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Declaring the Results of a Special Election in the City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-010 (Public Safety, Valley Square ) and Directing the Recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien" (the "Resolution Declaring Results of Election") which certified the results of the November 21, 2024 election conducted by the City Clerk, which results showed that more than two-thirds of the votes cast in the CFD were in favor of the proposition to levy the Special Tax and the proposition to establish an appropriations limit for the CFD;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY:

1. Recitals Correct. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. Authorization of the Levy of a Special Tax . By the passage of this Ordinance, the City Council authorizes the levy of the Special Tax in the CFD in accordance with the Rate and Method set forth in the Exhibit “B” to the Resolution of Formation, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated by reference herein.

3. Annual Rate Determination. The City Council is hereby further authorized to determine on or before August 10 each year, or such other dat e as is established by law or by the County Auditor-Controller of the County of Riverside, the specific Special Tax to be levied on each parcel of land in the CFD, except that special taxes to be levied shall not exceed the maximum rates set forth in the Rate and Method, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate.

4. Exempt Property . Except as provided in Section 53340.1 of the Act and except for properties that a local agency is a landowner of within the meaning of subdivision (f) of Section 53317 of the Act, pursuant to Section 53340 of the Act, properties of entities of the state, federal and local governments shall be exempt from the levy of the Special Tax. Reference is hereby made to the Rate and Method for a description of other properties or e ntities that are expressly exempted from the levy of the Special Tax.

5. Use of Collections. All of the collections of the Special Tax shall be used only as provided by the Act and in the Resolution of Formation. The Special Tax shall be levied only so lon g as needed for the purposes as described in the Resolution of Formation. -3-

6. Collection. The Special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the Special Tax may be collected by direct billing by the City of the property owners in the CFD or in such other manner as may be provided by the City Council. I n addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to any delinquent Special Tax payments.

7. Authorization. The specific authorization for adoption of the Ordinance is Section 53340 of the Act.

8. Severability. If for any reason any portion of the Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable for any particular parcel within the CFD, by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance, and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels within the CFD shall not be affected.

9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this Ordinance and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of December, 2024.

Guillermo Silva
Mayor
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2024-27 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of November, 2024 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of December, 2024, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of December, 2024.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.C
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-28

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE
NO. 24002 TO REZONE 3.55 ACRES LOCATED A T 4651
BROOKHOLLOW CIRCLE ( APN 167 -161-020) FROM

INDUSTRIAL PARK (I -P) AND MANUFACTURING -

SERVICE COMMERCIAL ( M-SC) TO BUSINESS PA RK
(BP), AND DETERMINING THAT THE PROJECT IS

EXEMPT FROM THE CALI FORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(B)(3)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. On April 4, 2024, the City Council initiated Change of Zone No. 24002 (the “Project”) to create consistency between the Zoning designation of the property located at 4651 Brookhollow Circle (APN 167 -161-020) and the 2017 Jurupa Valley General Plan . The property is zoned Industrial Park (I-P) and Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC), but has a General Plan designation of Busine ss Park (BP). The Industrial Park (I -P) and Manufacturing - Service Commercial (M-SC) zoning designations are not compatible with the Business Park (BP) land use designation as the Business Park zone is the only zoning designation that is compatible with the Business Park land use designation.

Section 2. Change of Zone.
(a) The City has initiated Change of Zone No. 24002 to rezone approximately

3.55 acres located at 4651 Brookhollow Circle (APN 167-161-020) from Industrial Park (I-P) and Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC) to Business Park (BP) as shown on Exhibit “A”. (b) Section 9.285.040.(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to the City ’s Zoning Ordinance that propose to change property from one zone to another. (c) Section 9.285.040.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing the Planning Commission shall render its decision within a reasonable time and transmit it to the City Council in the form of a written recommendation, which shall contain the reasons for the recommendation and, if the recommendation is to change a zone classification on property, the relationship of the proposed amendment to applicable general and specific plans. A copy of the recommendation shall be mailed to the applicant and proof thereof shall be shown on the original transmitted to the City Council. If the Planning Commission does not reach a decision due to a tie vote, that fact shall be reported to the City Council and the failure to reach a decision shall be deemed a recommendation against the proposed amendment. (d) Section 9.285.040.(4)(a) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission, the City Clerk shall

RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day, and give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission.

Section 3. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) Change of Zone No. 24002 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On September 25, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on Change of Zone No. 24002 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters .

Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC-2024-18 recommending that the City Council approve Change of Zone No. 24002.
(c) On November 21, 2024, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on Change of Zone No. 24002 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony the City Council closed the public hearing. (d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley make the followi ng environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:

The proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) because CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Here, the proposed project will change the zone of property so that it is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. As any proposed development on the site would need to be compatible with the General Plan, the cha nge of zone does not change any of the uses that would have otherwise been permitted on the site.

Section 5. Findings for Approval of Change of Zone. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that Change of Zone No. 24002 should be adopted because there is currently an inconsistency between the zoning designation for the property and the General Plan land use designation. Change of Zone No. 24002 involves changing the zoning map for 3.55 acres located at 4651 B rookhollow Circle (APN 167 -161-020) from Industrial Park (I -P) and Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC) to Business Park (BP), which will create consistency between the General Plan and the zoning designation for the property , as shown on Exhibit “A” .

The Industrial Park (I-P) and Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC) zoning designations are not compatible with the Business Park (BP) land use designation as the Business Park zone is the only zoning designation that is compatible with the Business Park land use designation. -3-
Section 6. Approval of Change of Zone . Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Change of Zone No. 24004 changing the zoning map for 3.55 acres located at 4651 Brookhollow Circle (APN 167-161-020) from Industrial Park (I-P) and Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M -SC) to Business Park (BP) . The City Manager is authorized to take any necessary action to effectuate the purposes of this Ordinance.

Section 7. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 8. Effect of Ordinance . This ordinance is intended to supe rsede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside adopted by reference by the City of Jurupa Valley in conflict with the terms of this ordinance.

Section 9. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

Section 10. Effective Date . This ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in government code section 36937.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of December, 2024.

Guillermo Silva
Mayor
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 20 24-28 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of November, 2024 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of December, 2024, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of December, 2024.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1
Exhibit “A”
Change of Zone Exhibit

Page | 1
03/28/2024.04/17/202120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO: HO

NORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: SUSAN PARAGAS, FINANCE DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.D
CHE

CK REGISTERS
RE

COMMENDATION
T
hat the City Council ratify the check registers dated October 24, 31, and November 4,7, and 14, 2024 as well as the payroll registers dated October 31, and November 8, 2024.

The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the annual budget process. The FY 2024-25 Budget was adopted on June 6, 2024. Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution throughout the fiscal year.

AN
ALYSIS
A
ll expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the Government Code.

THER INFORMATION
N
one.

INANCIAL IMPACT
C
heck registers:
10/
24/2024 $ 335,986.97
10/31/2024 $ 1,723.95
11/04/2024 $ 2,215,382.07
11/07/2024 $ 634,184.08
11/14/2024 $ 400,531.03

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 1
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.E

APPROVAL OF CITY HOLIDAY SCHEDULE
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 2024-129, entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING HOLIDAYS ON WHICH CITY
OFFICES SHALL BE CLOSED FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2025
B

ACKGROUND
T
he California Government Code designates days that are state holidays. The code further provides that city offices shall be closed on state designated holidays unless otherwise provided for by the city. The proposed action by the City Council will meet the intent of the code sections.

AN
ALYSIS
T
he City needs to identify the days on which city offices will be closed. The City has the authority to designate what holidays or days the city offices will be closed. In general, the state designated holidays are the norm but there is no particular restriction or other days city offices may be closed.

T
he resolution includes the following holidays on which city offices will be closed for the 2025 Calendar Year:

RETURN TO AGENDA

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-129

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING

HOLIDAYS ON WHICH CITY OFFICES SHALL BE
CLOSED FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2025

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Section 6700 of the California Government Code designates days that are holidays in the state; and
WHEREAS, Section 6702 of the California Government Code provides that City offices shall be closed on designated state holidays unless otherwise provided by the City; and WHERAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council desires and deems it in the best public interest to designate those holidays on which City offices will be closed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the C ity Council of the City of Jurupa Valley as follows:

Section 1. That the above recitations are true.

Section 2. That the public offices of the City shall be closed on the following dates in observance of indicated holidays:

January 1, 2025 New Year’s Day
January 20, 2025 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
February 17, 2025 Presidents’ Day
May 26, 2025 Memorial Day
June 19, 2025 Juneteenth
July 4, 2025 Independence Day
September 1, 2025 Labor Day
November 11, 2025 Veterans Day
November 26, 2025 Half-Day Holiday
November 27, 2025 Thanksgiving Day
November 28, 2025 Day after Thanksgiving
December 24, 2025 Christmas Eve
December 25, 2025 Christmas Day
Section 3. That all City holidays shall be observed as follows: If a holiday falls upon a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be deemed to be the holiday. If a holiday falls upon a Sunday, the following Monday shall be deemed to be the holiday.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. -2-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of December, 2024.
______________________________
Guillermo Silva
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-3-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024-129 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of December, 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of December, 2024. ________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.F
A

PPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND STC TRAFFIC, IN C. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

SERVICES FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION
AND SIGNAL HEAD UPGRADES (CIP #21112)
RE

COMMENDATION

1. T
hat the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc . of Carlsbad, California (Consultant) for Construction Management and Construction Inspections (CM/CI) Services in the amount of $263,630 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Upgrades (C IP #21112) and $132,200 for signal timing services for a not to exceed amount of $395,830.

ACKGROUND
C
ity Council approved CIP P roject #21112, Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades (the “Project”) as part of Fiscal Year 202 3-2024 through Fiscal Year 2027- 2028 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”). The Project will improve City Traffic Operations and Traffic Safety by interconnecting the traffic signals within the City’s network.

On March 26, 2023, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc. for design services for Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades CIP #21112. The design is now complete and approved by the City. As part of the design proposal the consultant was requested to provide an optional scope and fee proposal for the signal timing. These services were not required during the design phase, as these services are typically performed during and after the installation of new equipment. Staff is requesting that the City Council approve the proposal for the signal timing service for an amount of $132,200

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
as part of this agreement . The original 2023 fee proposal for this scope item was $185,254.80. A task savings was realized, reducing the task cost to $132,200, due to finalized plans providing better clarity and scope definition, along with reduced hours required as the STC team will also handle construction managemen t and inspection services.

AN
ALYSIS
Staff published a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades project for CM/CI services on the City’s PlanetBids portal, a web-based procurement and bidding system.

O
n November 18, 2024, the City received five responsive proposals from the following engineering consultants listed in alphabetical order.
• F
ountain Head, Fontana, CA
• STC Traffic, Inc., Carlsbad, CA
• TKE Engineers Inc., Riverside, CA
• Transtech Engineer’s Inc., Chino CA
• Willdan Engineering, Inc., San Bernardino, CA
P
er Section 3.15.100 of the Purchasing Section of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, professional services are defined as services provided by any specially trained and experienced person or firm in areas such as accounting, engineering, finance, and planning. Professional Services Agreements (PSA) are awarded by the City Council based on the demonstrated competence, qualifications, and the fairness and reasonableness of the cost of services to the City and shall not be awarded solely based on cost.

T
he proposals were reviewed by staff per the guidelines set forth in the RFP. Staff evaluated and ranked the proposals based on the consultants’ qualifications including project understanding past experiences and performance; familiarity with similar work; quality of personnel/staffing plan; and work plan.

A
fter reviewing all the proposals, STC Traffic, Inc. of Carlsbad, California was ranked as the best-qualified firm to provide the services. The Consultant is a well-established and experienced firm and is currently providing services for similar projects i n several surrounding communities. The Consultant is also very familiar with the City of Jurupa Valley, and it is presently providing traffic and traffic signal-related services on an on-call basis.

INANCIAL IMPACT
T
he proposed agreement is for a not -to-exceed amount of $ 395,820. If approved, the services will be funded through the Highway Safety Improvement Program ("HSIP") Grant, which requires a 50% local match. The local match will be funded by grant funds Page | 3
provided by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). There will not be any fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund.
*********************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *************************

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND STC TRAFFIC, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

SERVICES FORTHE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SIGNAL HEAD UPGRADES (CIP #21112)
(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OTHER THAN PUBLIC WORKS)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of December 19, 2024, between the City of Jurupa Valley ("City") and STC Traffic, Inc., a Carlsbad, California ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term
This Agr eement shall commence on December 5, 2024, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, but in no event later than December 5, 2026, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. Services
Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Performance
Consultant shall at all-time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. Payment
A. The City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Quotation for Service, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Three Htmdred Ninety-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty dollars ($395,820.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agr eement.

B. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council.
-1-
C. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.

Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultants' fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

5. Suspension or Termination of Agreement Without Cause A. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.

B. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.

6. Default Of Consultant
A. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performl)d after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.

B. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the perfonnance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. Special Federal Requirements.

The Consultant does hereby acknowledge that this project will be partially or fully funded with Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funding, as is legislated under Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C. 148) and regulated under Part 924 of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR Part 924) and is therefore subject to applicable Federal procurement, labor, enviromnental, equal opportunity, and other regulations or requirements, including, but not limited to those set forth in 23 U.S.C. 633 Subpart A-Federal-Aid Construction -2-
Contracts (Other than Appalachian Contract), the Required Contract Provisions set forth in Fonn FHWA 1273 and 29 CFR 5.5, any California Depaiiment of Transportation grant requirements as set forth in the Program Supplement No. 000000Z58 to Administering Agency- State Agreement for Federal Projects No. 08-5487S21 dated March 17, 2022, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Consultant shall comply with the requirements in the above-referenced documents and/or assist City with compliance as applicable, and also incorporate all applicable provisions to the documents noted above into any subConsultant agreements

8. Prevailing Wages
A. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by and in accordance with the requirements of Labor Code Sections 1720 et. seq. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute by this Consultant from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-Consultant hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $50.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any sub-Consultant under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement.

B. Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771. l(a). Consultant and any subConsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perfonn public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Consultant and subConsultants will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Public Works.hhnl.

9. Ownership and Maintenance Of Documents
A. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the perfonnance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly ,., -.)-
identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

B. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed ofby the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.

10. Indemnification.

Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials ( collectively "Indemnitees") with respect to any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys' fees and costs of defense ( collectively, "Claims" hereinafter), including but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys' fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant's duty to defend pursuant to this Section shall apply indep endent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

11. Insurance Requirements.

A. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

I) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
a)
form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.

Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
-4-
b) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
c) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. d) Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. no less than:
2) Minimum Limits oflnsurance. Consultant shall maintain limits a) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c)
California; Employer's Liability:
or disease.

Worker's Compensation as required by the State of
One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury d) Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. 3) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000 unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

B. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role· City officials ("Additional Insured") shall be covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds. -5-
2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.
4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days' prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Consultant of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Consultant shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating ofno less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

E. Modifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable the City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this section.

12. Independent Contractor
A. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its -6-
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.

Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

B. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for perfonning services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

13. Legal Responsibilities
The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

14. Confidentiality; Release Of Information
A. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agr eement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

15. Assignment
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. City consents to the use of the sub-consultants described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub-consultants shall be home by the Consultant and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agr eement.

16. General Provisions
A. Notices
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a -7-
receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant: STC Traffic, Inc.
5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 218
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attention: Jason Stack, TE, PTOE
B. Licenses. At all times during the tenn of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in foll force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.

C. Governing Law; Venue
1) The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 2) Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event
such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgm ent, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

D. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct
or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that 110 officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub- Consultants on this ptoject. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or no,t such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is -8-
entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

F. Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

G. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority
to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
-9-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agr eement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITYOFJURUPA VALLEY
Guillermo Silva
Mayor
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
STC TRAFFIC, INC.

By:---------------
Name: _____________ _
Title: _____________ _
By:---------------
Name: - ------------
Tit 1 e: _____________ _
[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]
-10-

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall provide construction management services for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Safety Upgrades for CIP No. 21112, Federal Project No. 5487(007) -11-
Construction Management and Inspection Services for
Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination &
Improvements Project (CIP 21112)
Federal Project No. HSIPL-5487(007)
STC Traffic, Inc
Mailing and Business Address:
5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 218
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Principal Contact: Jason Stack, President
P: (760) 602-4290
Submitted By:

Proposal For:

City of Jurupa Valley | November 18, 2024

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 1 Table of Contents

1. Cover Letter .......................................................................................................... 2

2. Organization/Company Profile ........................................................................ 3

3. Project Team ........................................................................................................ 7

4. Description of Services (Work Plan) ............................................................. 10

5. References ......................................................................................................... 17

6. Proposer’s Signature Page ............................................................................. 18

7. Certification of Non-Collusion....................................................................... 18

8. Relevant Licenses/Certifications ................................................................... 18

9. Fee Proposal ...................................................................................................... 18

10. Evidence of Insurability .................................................................................. 18 Attachments
A. Project Team Resumes
B. Proposer’s Signature Page
C. Non-Collusion Declaration (Exhibit B)
D. List of References (Exhibit C)
E. Copies of Relevant Licenses/Certifications
F. Evidence of Insurability
G. Required Subconsultant Information (Exhibit D)
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 2

1. Cover Letter
November 18, 2024
Attn: Amer Jakher
Project Manager
City of Jurupa Valley, Public Works Dept.
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
RE: Request for Proposals – Construction Management and Inspection Services for Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination & Improvements Project (CIP 21112) Federal Project No. HSIPL-5487(007)
STC Traffic, Inc. (STC) is pleased to submit our qualifications to the City of Jurupa Valley for Construction Management and Inspection Services for Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination & Improvements Project (CIP 21112).

STC brings exceptional advantages to the City, with unique insight into the City’s traffic signal and communications network and a proven track record of successfully delivering these types of services on numerous projects throughout Riverside and San Diego Counties. We offer a proven team, led by Jason Stack, TE, PTOE, who has master planned and overseen the implementation of citywide traffic signal systems in Temecula, San Diego, Chula Vista, and Carlsbad, and has led the assessment and design of the City’s traffic signal communications system.

We love working for the City and collaborating with City staff. Not only does the City have a strong familiarity with our team, but City staff regularly rely on us for important jobs. Since 2015, STC has supported the City with a range of initiatives and we continue to demonstrate our commitment on a daily basis.

As the contact person for this RFP and authorized representative to execute an agreement with the City, we have read and complied with all terms and conditions of the RFP and acknowledge all addenda and Q&A. We look forward to the opportunity to continue working with the City.

Sincerely,
_
Jason Stack, President
5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 218
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(760)
602
-4290, [email protected]

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 3

2. Organization/Company Profile
ST
C is a certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE). The
staff represented in our proposal are the staff that are going to be there for the City 100% of the time. Our staff is flexible working the hours necessary to make the
deadline. We understand the critical nature of the
consulting work we do. Our work is all about trust.

Guaranteed Availability
Our team currently supports the City of Jurupa
Valley with on-call traffic engineering services and are regularly on site and/or in the vicinity. We will provide the same level of service and availability on this project. We are 100% committed to providing boots-on-the-ground
and local resources to deliver this project.

Seasoned Project Management
The STC Team will be led by Jason Stack, T.E.,
P.T.O.E., and supported by in-house technical staff in STC’s engineering and systems and operations divisions. Jason is a Traffic Engineer with over 25 years of specialized traffic signal management experience and will lead STC’s team of experts. He will be the City’s primary point of contact and manage complex elements of the project.

Brief History
STC Traffic, Inc. has been providing
professional traffic engineering
services to municipal agencies in
Southern California for over 17 years.

Our team is recognized for its ability
to creatively solve problems arising
from the most challenging traffic
engineering projects.

We are comprised of professional
engineers in traffic and civil
engineering, traffic operations
engineers, certified planners, certified
IMSA signal technicians, ITS and
systems and network engineers, and
Public Works electricians/ inspectors.

These are exactly the professionals
that the City will need for this CM&I
project.

STC is structured as a full-service
extension of City staff precisely so
that our experts can address the City’s
immediate needs.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 4 The following information relates to STC’s
corporate/company profile:
• STC is a California Corporation doing
business for 17 years sinc
e
01/26/2007.
• ST
C employs 31 staff who work out of
STC’s Carlsbad office located at 5973
Avenida Encinas, Suite 218, Carlsbad,
CA 92008.
• STC holds no controlling or financi
al
i
nterests in any other organization,
nor is owned or controlled by any
other person or organization.
• Jason Stack, TE, PTOE, is the
President/Principal-in-Charge of STC
and the proposed Project Manager for
this contract. STC’s hierarchy and
organizational chart are discussed in
further detail in the Project Tea
m
s
ection.

CIP Projects Over $500K Managed by STC
Client, Project, and Description Dates Est.

Value
City of San Diego, Harbor Drive Freight Signal Priority Planning, design, integration, testing, and evaluation of ITS to improve freight movement along the Port.
2018-
2022 $20M
City of San Diego, Del Mar Heights Road Synchronization Planning, design, and deployment of comprehensive signal synchronization program and advanced traﬃc systems technology.
2019-
2021 $3M
City of Temecula, Traﬃc Signal Communications Master Plan/Implementation Planning, design, and implementation of citywide ﬁber optic communications upgrades. 2018-
Present $22M
City of San Diego, Traﬃc Signal Communications Master Plan/Implementation Planning, design, and implementation of citywide ﬁber optic communications upgrades. 2016-
Present $163M
City of Chula Vista, Traﬃc Signal Communications Master Plan/Implementation Planning, design, and implementation of citywide ﬁber optic communications upgrades 2015-
Present $15M
City of Long Beach, Citywide Communications Planning & Design Engineering conduit installations for seven coverage areas and connecting all City facilities 2023-
Present $6.5M
STC Traffic, Inc. | Est. 2007
California Corporation
Headquarters
5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 218
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Professionals
Licensed Civil & Traffic Engineers | Former City
Traffic Engineers | Public Works Inspectors |
Certified Planners | Certified IMSA Signal
Technicians | Systems and Network Engineers |
Construction Managers
Number of Employees – 31
Number of Employees Assigned - 7
Licenses/Certifications
• California DIR #1000009329
• California DGS SB (Micro): 53625
• SBE Metro (CUCP) Number: 6454
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 5 Dedication to traffic engineering combined with field expertise and technological know-how allows STC to excel in the following core service areas:

2. Traffic Engineering/Transportation Planning Services • Traffic Impact Studies and Reviews • Traffic Modeling • Parking Studies • Circulation Element Update
• Corridor Studies • Collision Trend and Traffic Safety Analysis • Feasibility Studies • Engineering and Traffic Surveys • Traffic Calming Assessments • Trip Generation Studies • Complete Street Studies • Conceptual Design of Improvements • School Related Operations • Grant Writing
• Congestion Management Plans • Community Engagement

3. Traffic Engineering Systems, Operations, and Construction Support Services • Constructability Reviews • Railroad Preemption Applications • Construction Management • System Integration
• Electrical Inspection Services • System Program Management • Maintenance Reviews • System Master Planning
• Staff Training • System Tests, Verification, Evaluation • TMC Operation and Management • System Troubleshooting • Performance Monitoring • ITS Technologies
• Traffic Signal Timing and Control Logic • Communications and Networking

1. Traffic Engineering Design Services
• Traffic Signal Design
• Signing and Striping Design
• Worksite Traffic Control Design
• Street Lighting Design
• Roadway and Intersection Design
• Traffic Detour/Control Plans
• Traffic Study Review
• Street Light Layouts
• Neighborhood Traffic Management Program
• Modern Roundabouts
• Communication Systems Design
• Traffic Calming Design
• Traffic Investigations
• Signal Warrant Analysis
• Traffic Engineering Plan Check
• Communications Conduit Plans (Fiber Optic
Interconnect)
• Alignment Studies
• Signal Coordination
• Traffic Counts/Delay & Speed Zone Analysis
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 6 STC Featured Project
CM&I for Limonite Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization | Eastvale, CA STC designed, inspected, and integrated a communications system, central management system, and traffic signal improvements for synchronized operations along Limonite Avenue between the Caltrans Interstate 15 ramps on the east and Archibald Avenue on the west. The project corridor includes eight traffic signals operated by the City and two traffic signals operated by Caltrans for the I-15 northbound and southbound ramps. Improvements included fiber optic interconnect, wireless communications, ATC cabinet deployment and hardware upgrades, and coordinated signal timing. STC was responsible for comprehensive construction management and inspection services.

Similar Projects
CM&I for Del Mar Heights Road Traffic
Signal Synchronization | San Diego, CA
STC oversaw this regional installation of a
signal synchronization project across City of
San Diego and Caltrans jurisdictions, local
implementation of TMS, controller upgrades,
intersection detection system upgrade, and
operations and systems maintenance. STC
provided construction support and inspection
for interchange improvements, including
traffic signal modifications, ramp metering
system modification, and sign illumination
system modification.

CM&I for TMC and Communication
Systems Upgrades | Imperial Beach, CA
STC is providing design and construction
management services for improvements to the
City’s TMC and fiber optic communications to
City facilities and traffic signals. STC is
providing procurement support for equipment
associated with the TMC build and fiber
connections, managing the contractor,
providing oversight, inspections, and technical
assistance throughout construction, and
providing configuration, integration, and
testing of hardware, software, and associated
equipment.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 7

3. Project Team
The STC Organizational Chart is shown below and followed by a discussion of team member roles and responsibilities. Staff identified with key roles will be committed throughout the duration of the project. Resumes for key staff are included in Attachment A. Our key personnel have many decades of combined traffic signal systems engineering, management, operations, and maintenance experience.

We have worked as municipal employees and extensions of staff in our role as consultants; we operate and maintain TMCs and systems; we have been foreman for electrical contractors in traffic signal construction and maintenance; we have managed the municipal Public Works Electrical Division; and, we have worked for traffic signal system suppliers and manufacturers relevant to this project.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 8 Project Team – Brief Bio Sketches
Years of Experience: 25 | Years with STC: 17
One of our core principles is that our managers are working managers who stay connected to the project on every level in order to sustain exceptional service. This core principle starts at the top of our Organizational Chart with Jason Stack, TE, PTOE, as Project Manager. Jason has over 25 years of specialized traffic signal management experience and will lead STC’s team of experts. He is a recognized expert in highly specialized traffic signal operations, ITS design and integration, and signal timing planning. He has master planned traffic signal communication systems for the Cities of San Diego, Chula Vista, Carlsbad, and Temecula. He will be the City’s primary point of contact and manage complex elements of the project.

Years of Experience: 13 | Years with STC: 8
Brett has over 13 years of experience as a design engineer and construction manager, playing an integral role in various traffic engineering and electrical projects throughout Western Riverside County. He is well versed in standard specifications and plans required by government agencies, skilled in field analysis, and has expertise in electrical and communications systems. He began his career in the construction industry, ultimately rising to the role of lead estimator for a large contracting firm bidding on projects over $100 million. He supports HSIP projects by providing construction management and inspection services, developing technical specifications and cost estimates for bid packages, and on-site integration support.

Years of Experience: 7 | Years with STC: 6
Gianluca has over 7 years of experience in the fields of traffic engineering and traffic signal operations. He has worked extensively on design of this HSIP project and will provide a throughline as the project transitions from design into construction. He will be responsible for potential design changes during construction.

Jason Stack, TE, PTOE | Project Manager
Brett Hansen, IMSA I | Construction Manager
Gianluca Pesaresi, EIT | Design Engineer

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 9 Labor compliance will be subcontracted to Innovative Construction Consulting Services, LLC (ICCS). Founded in 2009 and incorporated in 2016, ICCS specializes in supporting Government agencies on Public Works construction projects. ICCS provides municipal agencies with Construction Managers Inspectors and Certified Payroll auditors who thoroughly understand the entire capital improvement process from design, preparation of bid specifications to construction, scheduling, inspections, labor compliance, grant compliance and closeout. ICCS prides itself in providing a high level of service on Public Works projects and holds a MBE, DBE and SBE State Certification.

Adam Lember, IMSA III,
Senior Systems Engineer, has
over 27 years of experience
installing, troubleshooting,
and maintaining traffic signals
and communication networks,
including local experience in
Jurupa Valley. Prior to joining
STC, Mr. Lemberg worked for
McCain, Inc., for 14 years,
where he installed many of the
ATMS in the region.

Alain Hungerford, IMSA I,
Systems Engineer, has over 13
years of experience in the
deployment of traffic signal
systems, ITS systems, and
ATMS systems throughout
Southern California, including
local experience in Jurupa
Valley. Prior to STC, Alain spent
7 years in McCain’s ITS
Solutions department where
he provided support for
QuicNet and Transparity
deployments at over 40
agencies.

Joseph Walter, IMSA II,
Senior Project Engineer, has
over 16 years of experience in
traffic engineering design and
lighting design for various
public municipal projects.

Joseph is IMSA Level II
Certified and is experienced in
implementing various traffic
systems and operations
projects including traffic signal
timing, traffic signal
equipment, street lighting,
communications network, and
ITS systems.

Meet the Support Team
Subconsultant | Innovative Construction Consulting Services (ICCS)

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 10

4. Description of Services (Work Plan)
Project U nderstanding and
Approach
The City is seeking a qualified consultant to
provide Construction Management and
Inspection (CM&I) services for the HSIP funded
Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination & Safety
Improvements Project. The project involves
installing new retroreflective backplates at 84
locations and providing citywide
communications to all City-owned traffic
signals. Citywide communications
improvements include replacing legacy copper
interconnect with fiber, new fiber
infrastructure (conduit and cabling), wireless
radios, and network devices. Traffic signal
controllers will also be upgraded at each of the
project locations.

This project demonstrates significant
commitment on the part of the City to invest in
advanced technology and updated hardware
to improve the safety of its roadway network.

The project design is complete, and the City is
eager to begin construction and
implementation.

Resources are limited, and the City operates
with lean and efficient staff. We recognize the
City needs STC to self-deliver our expertise and
drive the agenda for this project. STC will
provide turn‐key services including Caltrans
processing, construction engineering,
inspection, integration, labor compliance, and
project close out.

This is a 200 working days project, and it will
be incumbent on STC to ensure that the
contractor’s schedule is in line with required
milestones.

ST
C understands how this project should be
optimally staged, resourced, and constructed,
and our insight will reduce the risk of
contractor schedule and cost overruns.

Our staff is versed in the LAPM, and we have
experience managing the entire process. STC
will deliver turn-key services including the
necessary documents in compliance with the
LAPM.

Our team is uniquely qualified to perform
CM&I services for this project. Our staff is IMSA
Levels II and III qualified, have served as Public
Works electrical shop managers and
inspectors, and have worked as electricians
and foremen for large construction
contractors. These levels of qualifications are
unique for an engineering firm and allows STC
to close the gap between our project
designers, our construction managers, and the
contractor’s staff.

STC has worked closely with City staff over the
years by providing on-call traffic engineering
services, traffic signal systems and operations
services, and inspection services. We know the
City’s traffic signal systems and standards and
bring the benefit of first-hand knowledge to
the project. There will be no learning curve
or transfer of knowledge required by our
team. Our systems engineers fully retain the
project background and will hit the ground
running in construction.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 11 There are two distinct areas of delivery for the
contractor on this project: 1) retroreflective
backplate upgrades and 2) traffic signal
communications and system upgrades.

It is anticipated that the retroreflective
backplates will get underway first and
potentially with separate crews for
underground conduit installation. We will
review the contractor’s schedule to ensure that
it provides the best path forward for the
ordering of locations to accomplish, with
consideration for build efficiencies, working
hours, traffic conditions, and impacts to local
businesses and residences.

The contractor is responsible for traffic control
plans. STC will coordinate with the contractor
and City to determine construction phasing
and prioritizing locations. Phasing/staging will
be developed to minimize impacts to traffic,
local business, and residences. We will reach
out to affected City services including the
sheriff and fire departments, the school district,
RTA, waste services, and others that will be
potentially impacted by construction. STC will
make sure that contractor traffic control abides
by City traffic control standards.

STC is familiar with every location of the
project. We have performed detailed field
review and documentation for all project
locations. We have site specific understanding
of the effort required from the contractor. The
information we have gathered from these
reviews will be shared with the contractor to
strategize the best approach. Additionally,
these reviews will serve as back-up in potential
construction disputes with the contractor.

Our Construction Manager, Brett Hansen, will
be responsible for ensuring the contractor
schedule, reviewing contractor submittals,
assisting the City with material procurement,
and overseeing inspections.

Brett has provided these exact services for
similar traffic signal backplate and
communications upgrades projects. We know
that with a project of this magnitude, the
contractor will need questions answered, and
this type of back and forth can cause project
delays. With his inside knowledge of the
project, Brett will readily answer contractor
questions. Any questions regarding extra work
will be tracked but will not hold up the project.

Our goal is to keep the City appropriately
involved and make the process as hands-off for
the City as possible.

Retroreflective Backplate Upgrades
The project will involve the removal and
replacement of traffic signal backplates at 84
locations. This work is straightforward, but due
to the large number of locations, this effort will
take a significant amount of time. Our goal is
efficiency, ensuring that the contractor is on
track and quickly dealing with unforeseen
issues. STC is no stranger to the effort required
for extensive signal hardware replacement.

STC has firsthand experience with traffic signal
head backplate replacement, witnessing the
challenges experienced by contractors and
noting typical solutions to these challenges.

We have been providing similar CM&I services
for the City of San Bernardino on an HSIP
project upgrading traffic signal heads, push
buttons, and pedestrian signal heads at 224
signalized intersections. The construction
management was led by Brett Hansen and
inspection led by Kevin Stone.

We have also provided construction
engineering services for citywide backplate
replacements in the Cities of Hemet, National
City, and Encinitas.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 12 Traffic Signal and Communication
Upgrades
The project involves installation of new
conduit and fiber optic cable, wireless radio
connections, new controllers, and associated
equipment. The installations will occur at the
project traffic signal locations and importantly
also at City Hall and the JVOC.

Our staff has extensive experience working in
the field in construction with traffic signal
systems and communications. Uniquely, we
also have extensive experience working in
building facilities with IT Departments to
implement communications systems and
integrate across the City IT network.

The critical aspect of the communication
system is the backbone connecting City Hall
and the JVOC and will require extensive
coordination with the City’s IT Department and
consultant staff. We have delivered this level of
construction management and construction
support for City Public Works traffic and IT
departments throughout Southern California,
most recently for the Cities of Eastvale,
Temecula, and Menifee.

Scope of Work
This section summarizes STC’s scope of work
and key deliverables to provide the CM&I
services required for the project. The scope of
work has been organized to follow the services
outlined in the RFP. The City provided a
comprehensive scope of services that included
all of the standard and detailed efforts to
deliver a construction management and
inspection services project. These services
have been integrated with the tasks that
follow.

Task 1. Administrative/Management
Relevant coordination tasks listed in the RFP,
Item 6. Project Coordination, have been
integrated with this task including
communication, meetings, schedule and
budget, and miscellaneous, as described
below.

Task 1.1 Coordination & Meetings
One of the big benefits of STC’s approach to
project coordination is access. The City has a
direct line of communication to all of our
project staff from management and technical
leads to junior staff and our subconsultant
ICCS.

This level of access isn’t always necessary but
very convenient when it is. We stay true to our
Organizational Chart. You will see our key staff
on the project. There is no bait or switch. We
also recognize the value in coordinating with
staff and we don’t put a fixed limit on
coordination. We are focused on project
delivery, and it is to our benefit and the
project’s benefit to access this knowledge as
much as possible.

STC will work with the City project managers
and contractor to outline appropriate lines of
communication throughout the duration of
the project. Weekly meetings will be held with
the contractor and City to discuss specific work
scheduled and the contractor’s look-ahead.

This will be necessary at the project start and
particularly for the work involving
retroreflective backplates. Once this work is
fully underway and depending on the
contractor’s work staging, meetings may be
reduced to biweekly. When the contractor is
installing conduit and fiber optic cable,
meetings will be required on a weekly basis.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 13 Task 1.1 Deliverables:
• In-person and/or virtual meetings
depending on contractor’s schedule and
the work being performed
• Monthly progress reports, including task
status, schedule progress, unresolved
issues, and review copies of work products
Task 1.2 Procurement Support
The City will directly procure certain types of
traffic signal equipment and software. STC will
manage this procurement effort providing the
City with the proper technical specifications,
quantities, bid documents, coordination with
vendors and manufacturers, pricing review,
and coordination of delivery schedules.

Specific equipment will need to be configured,
tested, and integrated by STC per Task 3. It will
be important to ensure that this equipment is
accessible to STC staff for these efforts. STC
may take receipt of this equipment directly for
testing purposes in our facilities and
subsequently provide this equipment to the
contractor for installation.

Task 1.2 D
eliverables:
• Equipment procurement list with
associated costs and supporting quotes
• Order tracking and confirmation of City
receipt of equipment
• Inspection of City received equipment at
City facility
• Pick-up and bench testing of relevant
equipment
Task 2. Construction Management &
Inspection
STC will perform construction engineering
services during the construction phase of the
project.

This includes attendance at the pre-
construction meeting, material submittal
reviews, response to requests for information
and clarification (RFIs and RFCs), and record as-
built drawings.

STC will provide Citywide IP scheme for
existing and proposed traffic signal network
equipment. The IP scheme will include these
devices and serve the future needs of all
devices connected to the communication
system. STC shall develop an Excel spreadsheet
organizing subareas and intersection, develop
an IP scheme, develop Subnet, VLAN’s and
routing, and assign IP addresses to all devices
connected to the network.

Relevant coordination tasks listed in the RFP,
Item 7. Construction Observation and Item 9.

Post Construction Services, have been
integrated with this task including
communication, meetings/inspection,
schedule and budget, construction,
administrative, and post construction services.

Task 2 D
eliverables:
• Attendance at pre-construction meeting
• Material submittal reviews
• Review of Contractor prepared fiber testing
documentation
• Responses to requests for information and
clarification (RFI’s and RFC’s)
• Attendance at recurring progress meeting
to review project status and construction
schedule
• Field documentation of Contractor
installed quantities and changes in
construction
• Review and tracking of project invoicing
• Construction inspection and daily
construction reports
• Project close-out documentation
• Project record as-built drawings
• Citywide IP scheme
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 14 Task 3. Configuration, Integration & Testing
STC shall configure and integrate project
communication equipment including traffic
signal controllers, ethernet switches, and
wireless radios.

STC shall perform testing of hardware,
software, and associated equipment at STC
offices, project intersections, and City facilities.

Testing shall include pre-installation, post-
installation (local), and end-to-end full system
functionality. Acceptance Test results shall be
recorded and documented by STC staff and
summarized in a document confirming the
complete connectivity of all system devices.

STC will coordinate and support City IT with
deployment of the Advanced Traffic
Management System (TMS). All new devices
and those operating prior to construction shall
be tested and verified through settings and
communications from the new central traffic
management system to the field and vice-
versa.

Relevant coordination tasks listed in the RFP,
Item 7. Construction Observation, have been
integrated with this task including material
testing.

Task 3 D
eliverables:
• Configuration of equipment
• Pre- and post-installation testing, end-to-
end full system functionality
• Documentation of test results
• Assistance with deployment of TMS
Task 4. Labor Compliance
STC will team with Innovative Construction
Consulting Services, LLC (ICCS) to ensure
Contractor compliance with labor laws.

ICCS specializes in supporting Government
agencies on Public Works construction
projects. ICCS provides municipal agencies
with Construction Managers Inspectors and
Certified Payroll auditors who thoroughly
understand the entire capital improvement
process from design, preparation of bid
specifications to construction, scheduling,
inspections, labor compliance, grant
compliance and closeout.

Task 4.

Deliverables
• Labor compliance interviews and
verification of compliance with federal
trainee apprenticeship requirements
• Certification of Contractor payroll records
for compliance with the higher of either
federal Davis-Bacon or state prevailing
wage rates
• Document and forward all correspondence
and payroll correction corrections with and
by the Contractor
• Informing the Project Manager of any
discrepancies or labor compliance
violations
Task 5. Signal Timing (Optional Task)
STC recognizes that signal timing,
programming, and corridor coordination will
be required as part of this project. Although
not included in the RFP scope of services, STC
is listing these tasks as optional should the City
pursue them through this contract.

Task 5.1 Signal Timing Conversions
(Optional Task)
STC will create 2070 ATC signal timing
databases from existing type 170 controller
datafiles or timing sheets. Our staff will
download signal timing from the intersection
field controllers to ensure accuracy.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 15 •
•
•
•
•
•
•

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 16 Quality Assurance/ Quality
Control Process
Quality Control procedures executed by the
STC Team will ensure that the work is done
correctly the first time using legitimate
technical methods for all team members and
proposers. Quality Assurance (QA) refers to the
certainty that products and services meet the
requirements for quality, including accurate,
well-written deliverables based on sound
reasoning and reasonable assumptions.

Quality Control and Assurance Strategy
• Clearly define project deliverables and
schedule with control points integrated in
the schedule.

As mentioned in the Projec
t
U
nderstanding, weekly meetings will be
hel
d with the contractor and City to
discuss specific work scheduled and the
c
ontractor’s look-ahead. This will be
necessary at the project start and
particularly for the work involving
retroreflective backplates. Once this
work is fully underway and depending
on the contractor’s work staging,
meetings may be reduced to biweekly.

When the contractor is installing condui
t
a
nd fiber optic cable, meetings will be
r
equired on a weekly basis.

We have performed detailed field review
a
nd documentation for all project
l
ocations. The information we have
g
athered from these reviews will be
s
hared with the contractor to strategize
the b
est approach. Additionally, these
r
eviews will serve as back-up in potential
construction disputes with the
contractor.
• Ensure qualified reviewers conduct
independent reviews in their specific areas
of expertise.

Our Construction Manager, Brett Hansen,
will be responsible for ensuring
the
c
ontractor schedule, reviewing
contractor submittals, assisting the City
with material procurement, and
overseeing inspections.

Brett has provided these exact services
for similar traffic signal backplate an
d
c
ommunications upgrades projects. Our
g
oal is to keep the City appropriately
i
nvolved and make the process as hands-
off for the City as possible.
• Identify clear standards used on design
and technical studies.
• Develop a documentation and
communications plan outlining the
protocol for all communications.
• Use standard format for documenting
comments and responses provided as part
of the review process.
• Use standard format and procedures for
certifying that all requirements of the QC
Plan have been met and that all comments
and issues have been resolved to the
satisfaction of the responsible person.
• Check all documents for accuracy and
completeness with prescribed checklists,
standards, policies, and procedures. QC
checklists will be refined for each Task
Order based on standard checklists used by
STC.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 17

5. References
We have established a successful track record through similar traffic engineering contracts. Below, we have included three client references. These references are also provided as part of Exhibit C in Attachment D.

City Client Reference
City of Eastvale
2016-Present
On-Call Traffic Engineering Services/Limonite Ave Traffic Signal Synchronization & CM&I
This contract includes relevant task orders and projects for traffic signal communications design and construction support. STC designed, inspected, integrated, and managed construction for a communications system, central management system, and traffic signal improvements for synchronized operations along Limonite Avenue. (2021-2023).

Client Reference: Yurhi Choi, Principal Engineer
(951) 703-4471, [email protected]
12363 Limonite Ave, Eastvale, CA 91752
City of San Diego
2015-Present
On-Call Traffic Engineering & ITS Services/Del Mar Heights Road Signal Synchronization & CM&I
This contract includes relevant task orders and projects for traffic signal communications design and construction support, including design and implementation of the City’s Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan. STC oversaw the installation of a signal synchronization project along Del Mar Heights Road, across City of San Diego and Caltrans jurisdictions, local implementation of TMS, controller upgrades, intersection detection system upgrade, and operations and systems maintenance. STC provided construction support and inspection for interchange improvements, including traffic signal modifications, ramp metering system modification, and sign illumination system modification. (2019-2021).

Client Reference: Stephen Celniker, PE, DCE, Senior Traffic Engineer (619) 533-3611, [email protected]
202 C St., San Diego, CA 92101
City of Imperial Beach
2015-Present
On-Call Traffic Engineering Services/Fiber Optic Communications CM&I This contract includes relevant task orders and projects for traffic signal communications design and construction support. STC is providing design and construction management services for improvements to the City’s TMC and fiber optic communications to City facilities and traffic signals. (2022-Present).

Client Reference: Juan Larios, PE, Public Works Director (619) 424-2214, [email protected]
825 Imperial Beach Blvd, Imperial Beach, CA 91932
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 18

6. Proposer’s Signature Page
The Proposer’s Signature Page is included as Attachment B.

7. Certification of Non -Collusion
The Certification of Non-Collusion is included as Attachment C.

8. Relevant Licenses/Certifications
Photocopies of relevant licenses and certifications are included as Attachment E.

9. Fee Proposal
Per RFP instructions, the fee proposal has been provided as a separate attachment on the City’s PlanetBids Vendor Portal.

10. Evidence of Insurability
STC’s certificate of insurance is included as Attachment F.

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 Attachment A
Project Team Resumes
Jason is the founder of STC
Traffic and has over 25 years
of experience managing
transportation planning,
traffic engineering, and ITS
projects for various agencies
throughout Southern
California. He is a recognized
expert in highly specialized
traffic signal operations, ITS
design and integration, and
signal timing planning. He
has master planned traffic
signal communication
systems for the Cities of San
Diego, Chula Vista, Carlsbad,
and Temecula.

Years of Experience: 25
Years with STC: 17
Education
B.S. Civil Engineering,
University of Massachusetts
at Lowell
Professional
Registrations
Professional Engineer
(Traffic) CA, #2790
Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer, USA,
#4174
Relevant Experience
City of Jurupa Valley, HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Safety Upgrades, 2023-Present
Principal-In-Charge. STC helped prepare the HSIP grant that secured funding for citywide traffic signal system safety improvements through improved traffic signal interconnect and signal timing, coordination, and operation and upgraded traffic signal heads with retro-reflective back plates. Jason is overseeing all elements of project design, which includes documenting and assessing needs of the existing traffic signal communications system, Caltrans processing, and development of PS&E.

City of Eastvale, Limonite Traffic Signal Synchronization, 2021-2023 Principal-In-Charge. STC designed, inspected, and integrated a communications system, central management system, and traffic signal improvements for synchronized operations along Limonite Avenue. Jason oversaw development of the Basis of Design, which established the condition of existing traffic signal infrastructure, identified system improvement alternatives, and presented budgetary costs and further steps for the project.He provided coordination during project construction.

City of San Diego, Del Mar Heights Road Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, 2019-2021
Principal-In-Charge. Jason oversaw this regional installation of a signal synchronization project across City of San Diego and Caltrans jurisdictions, local implementation of TMS, controller upgrades, intersection detection system upgrade to accommodate traffic responsive operations, and operations and systems maintenance and performance monitoring over multiple years.

City of Imperial Beach, TMC and Communication Systems Upgrade CM&I, 2022-Present
Principal-In-Charge. STC is providing design and construction management services for improvements to the City’s TMC and fiber optic communications to City facilities and traffic signals. Jason coordinated with the City and Port and provided oversight for fiber optic design review.

Various Agencies, Traffic Signal Communications Planning and Implementation, 2014-Present
Principal-In-Charge. Jason has master planned traffic systems for several agencies, including Temecula, San Diego, Chula Vista, and Carlsbad. This includes comprehensive assessment of existing communications infrastructure, planning, designing, and building TMCs, designing and implementing the communications systems, and improvements for signal timing and operations. He is currently overseeing implementation phases.

Jason Stack TE, PTOE
Project Manager

Relevant Experience
City of Eastvale, Limonite Traffic Signal Synchronization, 2021-2023 Construction Manager. STC designed, inspected, and integrated a communications system, central management system, and traffic signal improvements for synchronized operations along Limonite Avenue. Brett led field reviews that informed final design recommendations for required communications topology, paths, connectivity, and equipment for installation and operation. He provided details for trenching and options for conduit, along with cost estimates.

City of Hemet, HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal Visibility Upgrades, 2023-Present
Construction Manager. The City was awarded an HSIP grant to upgrade existing backplates with retroreflective backplates at 40 signalized intersections throughout the City’s major arterials. Brett has overseen field investigations, field inventory, and is providing bid and construction support.

City of San Bernardino, HSIP Signal Hardware Upgrades at 224 Signalized Intersections, 2022-Present
Construction Manager. Project will replace or install new equipment to the City’s existing traffic signal system. Hardware upgrades include traffic signal heads, pedestrian signal heads, and pedestrian pushbuttons. Brett is responsible for construction support, including review of contractor submittals, coordination with the contractor, and verification of contractor installed facilities per design plans.

City of Imperial Beach, TMC and Communication Systems Upgrade CM&I, 2022-Present
Construction Manager. STC is providing design and construction management services for improvements to the City’s TMC and fiber optic communications to City facilities and traffic signals. Brett is responsible for providing procurement support for equipment associated with the TMC build and fiber connections, managing the contractor, and providing oversight, inspections, and technical assistance throughout construction
City of La Mesa, HSIP Citywide Ped Signal and Push Button Upgrades CM&I, 2022-2023
Construction Manager. Following project design, Brett provided Construction Management and Inspection services for improvements at nine intersections to replace pedestrian signal heads and pushbuttons with new APS, as well as traffic signal controller upgrades at four locations. His responsibilities included procurement support, contractor coordination and schedule, field review for wireless radio install, response to RFIs, and contractor submittal review.

Brett leads STC’s
construction engineering
and construction
management support
services. He is well-versed
in standard specifications
and plans required by
government agencies,
skilled in field analysis, and
has expertise in electrical
and communications
systems. He supports HSIP
projects by providing
construction support,
developing technical
specifications and cost
estimates for bid packages,
and onsite integration
support.

Years of Experience: 13
Years with STC: 8
Education
B.S. Civil Engineering
(mathematics minor),
California State University,
Chico, 2011
Certifications
IMSA Level 1 - Traffic Signal
Field Technician
Corning Fiber Installation
Certified
construction Manager
Brett Hansen IMSA I

Relevant Experience
City of Jurupa Valley, HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Safety Upgrades, 2023-Present
Project Engineer II. Supported HSIP grant development for citywide traffic signal system safety improvements through improved traffic signal interconnect and signal timing, coordination, and operation, and upgraded traffic signal heads with retroreflective back plates. Gianluca conducted extensive field reviews and developed PS&E.

City of Eastvale, Limonite Traffic Signal Synchronization, 2021-2023 Project Engineer II. STC designed, inspected, and integrated a communications system, central management system, and traffic signal improvements for synchronized operations along Limonite Avenue. Gianluca was responsible for developing splice diagrams and network architecture, determining locations for field verification, and construction notes.

City of La Mesa, HSIP Citywide Ped Signal and Push Button Upgrades, 2022-2023
Project Engineer II. Project improvements involved replacing pedestrian signal heads and pushbuttons with new APS at nine intersections and traffic signal controller upgrades at four locations. Gianluca was responsible for developing technical specifications, engineer’s cost estimate, and bid schedule.

City of Poway, HSIP Poway Road Corridor Improvements, 2023-Present Project Engineer II. Project improvements include safety signage, installation or extension of medians, and traffic signal modifications to implement dilemma zone detection at five signalized intersections along the project corridor.

Gianluca conducted field reviews, developed exhibits for alternatives analysis, developed base work, prepared PS&E for traffic signal and civil countermeasures, responded to RFIs, and coordinated with Caltrans for LAPM requirements. .

City of Chula Vista, Eastside/Millenia Fire Station Fiber Improvements Project, 2020-2024
Project Engineer II. STC designed fiber optic communications to the new Millenia Fire Station with extensions of the fiber optic network along several corridors breaking out to 33 traffic signals and connecting to the City’s existing network. Gianluca was responsible for field investigations, developing the existing utilities base work, PS&E, splice diagrams, and coordination with City and utilities.

Gianluca has over 7 years
of experience in the fields
of traffic engineering and
traffic signal operations.

Prior to joining STC,
he served as a traffic
engineering intern for the
City of Encinitas, where he
was primarily responsible for
assisting with traffic calming
measures in residential
areas, reviewing traffic
control plans, and working
closely with citizens to
resolve traffic-related issues.

In his current role, Gianluca
applies his experience and
technical skills in traffic
engineering design, data
collection/analysis, graphics
production, and before/after
traffic analyses in support of
municipal projects.

Years of Experience: 7
Years with STC: 6
Education
B.S. Civil Engineering, San
Diego State University,
2017
Professional
Registrations
Engineer-In-Training (EIT),
CA # 162712
Project engineer ii
Gianluca Pesaresi EIT

Relevant Experience
City of Jurupa Valley, On-Call Traffic Operations, 2017-Present Senior Systems Engineer. Adam has been responsible for programming and implementing traffic signal timing throughout the City, including remote and on-site operations and troubleshooting. Adam programs and tests the signals and systems operation on the bench within STC’s systems laboratory to verify functionality prior to field implementation.

City of Eastvale, Limonite Traffic Signal Synchronization, 2021-2023 Senior Systems Engineer. STC designed, inspected, and integrated a communications system, central management system, and traffic signal improvements for synchronized operations along Limonite Avenue. The project corridor includes 12 traffic signals: eight operated by Eastvale, two operated by Jurupa Valley, and two at the I-15 ramps operated by Caltrans. Adam was responsible for overseeing the contractor, implementing signal timing and coordination plans, and training City staff on the new systems.

City of Temecula, HSIP Fiber Optic Communications System Upgrade Project, 2018-Present
Senior Systems Engineer. STC was responsible for design engineering, construction support, system integration support, and corridor traffic signal timing for an existing system of 41 traffic signals on three corridors. The project is the first deployment of IP based communications in the City with many new state-of-the-art technologies and applications and has expanded to Citywide upgrades. The existing infrastructure investments in conduit and fiber are being leveraged to the greatest extent possible. Adam has coordinated with the City’s IT department for fiber capacity and network improvements to provide service to meet additional needs beyond traffic signal communication.

Adam was responsible for coordination and synchro review for system integration, development of the IP Scheme, IT support, and coordination and implementation of timing.

City of Menifee, HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal Communications Upgrades, 2017-2020
Senior Systems Engineer. The project involved citywide upgrades to the wireless interconnect system including radios, controllers, and related communication equipment to improve safety and operations via optimized traffic signal timing coordination, ultimately providing communication to all 62 signals in the City.

Adam was responsible for developing the traffic system IP scheme, converting signal timing from 170 to the new 2070 controllers, and on-site integration support.

Adam has over 27 years
of experience installing,
troubleshooting, and
maintaining traffic signals
and communication
networks. Prior to joining
STC, Adam worked for
McCain, Inc. for 14 years,
where he installed many
of the advanced traffic
management systems in
Southern California and the
infrastructure necessary for
network communications.

Adam is a regional expert
in traffic signal and ITS
systems and technologies,
experienced in managing
sophisticated intersections
and highly recognized
for his ability to build
communications networks
and solve complex electrical
and communications
problems. Adam supports
several contracts in Western
Riverside County, providing
technical input for nearly
all of STC’s signal cabinet
operations and signal
timing plans.

Years of Experience: 27
Years with STC: 11
Certifications
IMSA Level 3 - Traffic Signal
Senior Field Technician
senior systeMs engineer
Adam Lemberg IMSA III

Relevant Experience
City of Jurupa Valley, HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal Communications Upgrades, 2023-Present
Senior Project Engineer. STC helped prepare the HSIP grant that secured funding for citywide traffic signal system safety improvements through improved traffic signal interconnect and signal timing, coordination, and operation and upgraded traffic signal heads with retro-reflective back plates. Joseph was responsible for PS&E review at 60% and 90% submittal.

City of San Diego, Del Mar Heights Road Traffic Signal Synchronization CM&I, 2019-2021
Senior Project Engineer. STC oversaw this regional installation of a signal synchronization project across City of San Diego and Caltrans jurisdictions, local implementation of TMS, controller upgrades, intersection detection system upgrade, and operations and systems maintenance. These improvements included traffic signal modification, ramp metering system modification, and sign illumination system modification. Joseph developed PS&E for traffic signal modifications and traffic control, created SIC splice diagrams, and updated plans for contractor submittals.

City of Lake Elsinore, HSIP Traffic Signal Improvements, 2020 Senior Project Engineer. The goal of the project was to implement new dilemma zone detection systems and flashing beacon warning assemblies for eight signalized intersections. The project included adjusting plans to a new intersection as directed by the City. Joseph was responsible for developing specifications, completing PES forms and RFA forms for construction, and providing QA/QC for final PS&E.

City of Hemet, HSIP Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrades Project, 2020 Senior Project Engineer. Under a contract for on-call plan checking, STC was tasked with developing PS&E for signal equipment upgrades at 40 intersections prior to the grant construction RFA deadline. Equipment included LED safety lighting pedestrian countdown heads, APS push buttons, and 2070 controllers.

Joseph was responsible for developing specifications for final submittal.

Joseph has over 16 years
of experience in traffic
engineering design and
lighting design for various
public municipal projects.

He is experienced in
preparing PS&E for various
traffic engineering and
street lighting projects,
including federally funded
design projects. Joseph
is IMSA Level II Certified
and is experienced in
implementing and
integrating various traffic
systems and operations
projects including traffic
signal timing, traffic signal
equipment, street lighting,
communications network,
and ITS systems.

Years of Experience: 16
Years with STC: 10
Education
B.S. Civil Engineering, San
Diego State University,
2008
Certifications
IMSA Level 1 - Roadway
Lighting Technician
IMSA Level 2 - Traffic Signal
Field Technician
senior Project engineer
Joseph Walters IMSA II

Relevant Experience
City of Jurupa Valley, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, 2018-Present Systems Engineer. Alain is responsible for responding to signal system issues, field implementation and communication troubleshooting, and Synchro/ implementation of signal timing on critical intersections/corridors.

City of Eastvale, Limonite Traffic Signal Synchronization, 2021-2023 Systems Engineer. STC designed, inspected, and integrated a communications system, central management system, and traffic signal improvements for synchronized operations along Limonite Avenue. Alain performed 170 to Omni controller conversions, fine-tuned coordination plans, conducted before/after performance analysis, and provided IT transparity support.

City of Temecula, HSIP Fiber Optic Communications System Upgrade Project, 2021-2022
Systems Engineer. The project was the first deployment of IP based communications in the City with many new state-of-the-art technologies and applications. Fiber capacity and network improvements were coordinated with the City’s IT department to meet additional needs beyond traffic signal communication. Alain was responsible for developing base and coordinated signal timing, synchro model analysis, bench testing, deployment and fine- tuning of signal timing, and performance reporting.

City of Menifee, HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal Communication Upgrades, 2020-2021
Systems Engineer. STC prepared two successful HSIP Cycle 7 grant applications for installation of wireless interconnect systems on the City’s East and West side, with related communication upgrades to improve safety and operations via optimized traffic signal coordination. Alain developed and tested controller timing and provided extensive on-site integration support and assisted in the first-time conversion from the outdated 170 controller platform to the ATC platform with McCain’s Omni controller software citywide.

City of Imperial Beach, TMC and Communication Systems Upgrade CM&I, 2022-Present
Systems Engineer. STC is designing and managing construction of project improvements for a new Traffic Management Center and high-speed communications to specified City facilities and all City traffic signals. Alain was responsible for configuration, integration, and testing of communication equipment and software, coordination with Caltrans for signal timing deployment, and on-site demonstrations of the new TMC.

Alain has over 13 years of
experience in providing
support for ATMS/ITS
deployments and continued
operation for various
agencies throughout
North America. Working
closely with City Engineers,
he provides detailed
information to assist in
decision making while
performing operational
improvements. He actively
monitors and operates
several City TMC’s from STC’s
office, providing support
for both Central Systems
and controller operations.

Alain currently works in an
on-call basis for agencies
throughout the Inland
Empire, providing support
for traffic signal operations
and signal systems, with
specialized expertise in
traffic management centers.

Years of Experience: 13
Years with STC: 6
Certifications
IMSA Level 1 - Traffic Signal
Field Technician
systeMs engineer
Alain Hungerford IMSA I

Relevant Experience
City of Escondido, Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan and Implementation, 2024-Present
Senior Electrical Inspector. STC is developing a Master Plan report that will evaluate the City’s current traffic signal system, identify opportunities for modern communications systems technology, near-term and ultimate system needs, and a phasing strategy for implementation. Steven is conducting field reviews to establish existing conditions and inform the ability to leverage conduit for near- term and ultimate implementation and design review for PS&E, including cable installed in existing conduit and radios installed on traffic signal poles.

City of Long Beach, HSIP Intersection Improvements Project, 2024-Present
Senior Electrical Inspector. Steven is providing traffic technical review of plans prepared by the City and preparing project technical specifications and Issued for Bid (IFB) documents to construct/install protective left turn phase at six intersectections.

City of Chula Vista, Traffic Signal Communications Upgrades, 2024 Vendor/Project Manager. The project involved establishing new fiber optic and Ethernet communication systems for 20 signalized intersections along several key corridors. Steven was responsible for materials procurement, field scheduling, and overseeing installation.

City of National CIty, 8th Street Revitalization Project, 2016 Foreman/Traffic Signal Technician. City beautification and safety improvement project of the 8th Street corridor from Harbor drive to Highland Ave, which included installation of decorative streetlights, modification of existing traffic signals, installation of new traffic signals, and installation of radio- controlled RRFB pedestrian crosswalks. Steven was responsible for supervising modifications to existing traffic signals, and installation of new traffic signals and street lighting.

City of Chula Vista, 3rd Ave Streetscape Project, 2014
Foreman/Traffic Signal Technician. City beautification project of the 3rd Ave corridor from H St to E St, which included installation of decorative streetlights, modification of existing traffic signals, installation of new traffic signals, and installation of radio-controlled RRFB pedestrian crosswalks. Steven was responsible for supervising modifications to existing traffic signals, and installation of new traffic signals and street lighting.

Steven brings 22 years of
experience in the traffic
signal and street lighting
industry and specializes in
specification, procurement,
and installation of electrical
equipment. He served
16 years in the field as a
foreman/traffic signal
field technician where he
supervised the installation
and modification of
hundreds of traffic signals
and street lights. For the past
6 years, he worked in sales
of electrical equipment,
procuring materials for
public agency projects
throughout Southern
California.

Years of Experience: 22
Years with STC: <1
senior electrical insPector
Steven Johnson

Innovative Construction Consulting Services, LLC
P
.O. Box 6211
Norco CA 92860
Phone (951) 532-6483
Lic. # 671810
[email protected]
Sean Gill
Construction Management/Inspection
Services
P
rofessional Summary
Sean has more than 3 8 years of construction
management, engineering, and project management
experience for a broad range of civil engineering projects involving roads, sewer, water, storm drain, dry utilities, traffic signal improvements, bridge widening, grade
separation, wat er reservoir, sewer lift station, sewer lining, manhole reconstruction, sidewalk, ADA and
miscellaneous infrastructure improvements. Sean’s experience comes from both the contractor’s view point and the owner/owner’s rep as he has worked for both. Sean is a high energy, result and goal oriented, highly motivated individual with a proven track record of completing projects on time, under budget with a proactive approach to resolving project matters. He has extensive Primavera scheduling experience with knowledge in cost and resource loading. He is highly experienced in providing claims and conflict resolution, problem solving and decision making as a result and blend of his common sense, creativity, and big-picture views and ideas. When representing Publ ic Agencies, Sean knows what contractors are looking for when constructing projects, can provide extensive constructability reviews and provides extensive claims avoidance skills and techniques. In addition, Sean is an instructor at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona and has developed curriculum and taught the Legal Aspects of Construction course since 2015. He is also LAPM Certified and has extensive knowledge and experience with Labor Compliance, HSIP compliance and grant audits.

Partial Project List
• Paradise Creek Improvements – APWA
Project of the Year 2017
• A Ave. Green St. Imp. – APWA Project of
t
he Year 2016 National City
• Kimball Park Improvements – APWA
Honors 2017 National City
• Paradise Creek Imp., National City
• Euclid Bike & Ped. Enh., National City
• Valley Pavement Rehab 13/14 &
14/15, Jurupa Valley
• Limonite Median Improvements, Jurupa
Valley
•
Limonite Ave Paving, Jurupa Valley
• Long Beach Queensway Bay $19M
• HMA Proving Grounds $23M
• City of Riverside CIP – 2006 to 2008 -
$130M
• Admiralty Way St. Imp., LACDPW
• Jurupa Grade Separation, Riverside
• La Sierra Bridge Overpass/91 Freeway
• Riverside Downtown Mall Renovation
Imp
rovements
• MdR Infrastructure Program, LACDPW
Education & Certification
• Cal Poly Pomona, Construction
Management, Advanced CM and
Business Management Certification
• “A” General Engineering and C-
27 L
icense – State of California CSLB
• Primavera Trained and Certified with
30+ years’ experience
• Cal Poly Pomona Construction
Management Instructor – “Lega
l
A
spects of Construction”
• Confined Space Entry/SCBA Trained
• HASWOPER 40 Hour and 8 Hour
S
upervisor Trained
• CA LTAP RE Academy Training 202
 38 Years of Construction
Management, Engineering, and
Project Management Experience
 Project Manager / Construction
Manager on 100’s of Public Works
Projects of all types throughout
Southern California
 Labor Compliance Specialist
 SME (Subject Matter Expert) CSLB
Innovative Construction Consulting Services, LLC
P
.O. Box 6211
Norco CA 92860
Phone (951) 532-6483
Lic. # 671810
[email protected]
Parker Gill
Construction Management/Inspection
Professional Summary
Parker Gill brings more than 4 years of Construction
Management and Inspection experience in public works
construction, including both civil and facility
improvements. Parker Gill, joined the ICCS team in 2019 and is rapidly gaining experience in the industry. He has a fresh new approach and thought process when it comes
to managing construction projects. Parker has taken on multiple rolls with ICCS performing project inspections, site interviews, Labor Compliance reviews, Certified Payroll Audits, tracking and verifying project quantities and documenting daily manpower. He is very detail oriented and has a good understanding of project plans and specifications. Parker is capable of managing multiple projects, performing submittal reviews, managing RFI’s, reviewing and preparing monthly progress payments and change orders and verifying certified payroll compliance. With a fresh new approach to Construction Management and Inspection, Parker has brought a new vision and approach that has been valuable to the ICCS team. His exposure to both office and field conditions has accelerated his knowledge and understanding in the industry. He is constantly reviewing old techniques and searching for ways to improve his growth and abilities. He is capable of managing projects from start to finish and also assist the team as needed on additional projects.

R
elevant Experience
Construction Management /Inspection, Southern California Most recently providing Public Works Construction Management and Inspection for the City of National City as well as Labor Compliance and Grant Audits for the past 6 years, Parker has been exposed to numerous construction projects from civil improvements to new facility construction and upgrades. Parker monitors project documents for project compliance, documents contractor’s daily activities and quantity sheets, and provides general project oversight and safety review. Parker’s past experience with CBU’s marketing department provided him with the knowledge and ability to multi -task, manage project schedules and ensure project tasks were completed on time as specified. ICCS provides extensive Grant audits for Public Agencies including Labor Compliance audits, preparing project close-out documentation and over grant compliance.

P
artial Project List
• Division Road Diet, National City
• Euclid Bike & Ped. Enh., NC
• 16th St. Improvements, NC
• Sweetwater River Bike, NC
• Palm Ave Rehab. Project, NC
• Paradise Creek Water Quality
Imp
rovements, NC
• Roosevelt Smart Growth, NC
• Civic Center Imp., NC
• El Toyon Las Palmas Bicycle Corridor,
NC
• Citywide Safe Routes to School, NC
• Citywide Pedestrian Signal Project,
City of La Mesa
E
ducation
• California Baptist University, BS Business/Marketing
 6 Years of Project Management
Experience
 Construction Inspection – Public
Works Experience, both Civil and
Facilities Improvements
 Certified Payroll review and
co
mpliance
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 Attachment B
Proposer’s Signature Page
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services

PROPOSER'S SIGNATURE PAGE
By signing this form, the Consultant states that the firm(s) has sufficient staff resources and capability to perform the work contained within this Request for Proposal.

PROPOSER: _____ sT_C_T_r_a_ff_ic_, _ln_c_. ________________ _ (Consultant Name)
ADDRESS: _____ 5_9_7_3 _A_v_en_i_da_En_c_i_na_s_, _Su_i_te_2_1_8_,_C_a_rls_b_a_d_, C_A_9_20_0_8 ____ _ TELEPHONE NUMBER: __ (_76_0_)_6_02_-_42_9_0 _______________ _ PRINT NAME: _____ Ja_s_o_n_S_ta_c_k ___________________ _ SIGNATURE:_ _ A;>(/ --__,s;:t -- _________ _
President / / /' , z.L' TITLE: ____________ DATE:. ___ --'- ._,_ -__ ,....;__ ___ _ PRINT NAME: ________________________ _
SIGNATURE: _________________________ _
TITLE: ______________ DATE: ___________ _

SIGNING INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONSUL TANT
This Proposal must have a valid signature above and be delivered as required or it will be considered non-responsive (CCP 1933).

Proposer's Signature Page to be accompanied by notary certificates attached following this page. Note the description of the document on the notary certificate and attach notary certificates immediately following this page.

General Partners must sign on behalf of the partnership.

In the event that the consulting firm is a corporation, two (2) corporate officers having authority from the corporation MUST sign (two (2) signatures total). If the corporation has a corporate resolution stating that one person is authorized to sign on behalf of all officers, attach corporate resolution immediately following the notary certificates. Corporate Seal may be affixed hereto. -16-
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE§ 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California ...._
County of Sal\ Ot...MJ u
On I l\ly\J,o)-,LJ.

Date
before me,\ J Th b }Jp,ru"r 0....6 \ L
Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
personally appeared ---=J:;_u=--.<l<V\=----.,L___.1t<..,../,,.._J _;:v.>:.......=,li / ,.,_d L_____C&f?.-,..___.___-'---=-l ..... L=-------------- Namef) of Signer¢
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence. to be the person(l)' whose name ls¥re subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ e/th.ey executed the same in his/h 1-/tl(eir authorized capacity(i¢. and that by his/h /th¢f signature on the instrument the person , or the entity upon behalf of which the person(1 acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
eeeeeeeeeeeel
• • Notary Public - California z
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
, '1'. , JUSTINE TRIMBLE
San Diego County
Commfssion It 2351890 -
y Comm. Expires Mar 16, Z025
Place Notary Sea/ Above
Signature 1rk¾l!,
Signature of Notary Public
---------------OPTIONAL---------------
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document I Q Title or Type of Document �fu)�ot.JP�D=r.e=-=/'--=:J_ �S iq�· 1-!...M"=-iiw'� -="-=----"'--'}Q-,,::=. ________ _ Document Date: l l / l c..( I @4 Number of Pages: ____ _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ______________________ _ Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: ___________ _
D Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _
[] Partner - D Limited [J General
D Individual D Attorney in Fact
D Trustee D Guardian or Conservator
D Other: ______________ _
Signer Is Representing: _________ _
Signer's Name: ____________ _
D Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _
D Partner - 0 Limited CJ General
D Individual D Attorney in Fact
D Trustee D Guardian or Conservator
0 Other: _____________ _
Signer Is Representing: ________ _
'""�� - - - -- - -
©2015 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 STC Traffic, Inc.
5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 218 | Carlsbad | CA | 92008 Phone: (760) 602-4290 | www.stctraffic.com
Board of Directors Resolution
TO:

City of Jurupa Valley
Public Works Department
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valey, CA 92509
RE: Corporate Resolution for Signature Authority
This is a Certified Copy of Resolution that was passed at a Meeting of the Board of Directors of STC Traffic, Inc., a California Corporation, at which a quorum was present on January 10, 2023.

RESOLVED, that th
is Board of Directors hereby authorized and directs the following:

1. Jason Stack, TE, PTOE, President
Email: jaso
[email protected]
Address: 5973 Avenida Encinas, #218 | Carlsbad | CA | 92008 Phone: (760) 602-4290
is authorized for single signature authority, to sign contracts, amendments to contracts, review
various claims, binding the firm to any agreement and all instrument s on behalf of STC Traffic, Inc. Board of Directors and Management Team.

Jason Stack, President
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Mary (Sandra) Sass, CFO
Anya Kennedy, Secretary
Adam Lemberg, Director

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 Attachment C
Non-Collusion Declaration (Exhibit B)
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services
-18-
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services

EXHIBIT B

NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION TO BE

EXECUTED BY PROPOSER AND SUBMITTED WITH PROPOSAL
The undersigned declares:

I am the [Declarant’s title] of , the party making the foregoing Proposal.

The Proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The Proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham.

The Proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal. The Proposer has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or to refrain from proposing. The Proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the Proposal price of the Proposer or any other proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the Proposal price, or of that of any other proposer. All statements contained in the Proposal are true. The Proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her Proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham Proposal, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a Proposer that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the Proposer.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on [date], at [city], [state].

Signature:

Print Name:

Title:

Address:

Telephone No:

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 Attachment D
List of References (Exhibit C)
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services
-19-
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services

EXHIBIT C

LIST OF REFERENCES

ON-CALL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
PROPOSER:

REFERENCES
Following are the names, addresses and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which PROPOSER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years:

1. Name and Address of Agency
Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Annual Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed

2. Name and Address of Agency
Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Annual Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed

3. Name and Address of Agency
Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Annual Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 Attachment E
Relevant Licenses/Certifications
/0/1/2 /3/4/i255/6/7/8/9/10/11/i255/12/8/6/13/14/i255/15/16/17/8/18/16 /19/20/21/3/0/22/3/i255/24/25/26/3/4/i255/7/18/8/27/27/28/9/i255/15/14/29/28/14/15/15/18/6 /19/20/21/3/0/22/3/i255/22/24/1/24/30/22/4/i255/9/31/15/8/18 /1/32/32/33/3/22/22
/34/35/36/37/i255/8/38/15/14/28/16/8/i255/15/14/9/28/14/8/6/i255/6/39/28/7/15/i255/40/41/42 /9/8/18/31/6/43/8/16/i255/9/8/i255/35/40/44/44/42
/6/8/14/i255/16/28/15/29/13/i255/9/13/39/14/7/45
/31/28/9/15/14/6/28/14/29/i255/16/15/7/8/28/31/6/i255/27/13/18/46/i255/40/36/35/44 /20/22/22/30/1/0/21/3/i255/32/1/24/3
/12/8/14/39/8/18/45/i255/40/36/11/i255/40/44/41/47
/3/48/26/20/33/1/24/20/49/0/i255/32/1/24/3
/12/39/14/15/i255/37/44/11/i255/40/44/40/47
/21/30/33/33/3/0/24/i255/32/1/24/3/i255/50/i255/24/20/2/3 /14/13/38/15/51/43/15/18/i255/41/42/11/i255/40/44/40/52 /41/46/34/46/42/i255/8/51
/43/13/8/18/16/i255/27/13/18/i255/53/18/13/27/15/6/6/28/13/14/8/31/i255/15/14/29/28/14/15/15/18/6/11 /31/8/14/16/i255/6/39/18/38/15/45/13/18/6/11/i255/8/14/16/i255/29/15/13/31/13/29/28/6/7/6

Congratulations on obtaining your IMSA Certification. Below is your card, and you can print your current certification card or certificate any time by logging into your IMSA profile at www.IMSAsafety.org (click Sign In at the top of the page).

All IMSA certifications are valid for a three-year period from date of issue. The expiration date can be found on the certificate and certification card. Renewal requirements must be completed prior to the expiration date of each certification.

For detailed information on Renewal Requirements visit: www.IMSAsafety.org/certrenew Renewal Requirements:

Complete a personal log of your continuing education by documenting training and/or certification(s) received.

Documentation can be recorded online in your IMSA profile OR by downloading the Renewal Packet found on the Renewal Requirements page. Certificates of completion, transcripts and any other relevant documentation can be uploaded on the IMSA website.

Options for Renewal:

Continuing Education

Attending Certification Course

Achieving the Next Level Certification
Documentation
It is the certification holder
¶
s responsibility to submit proof of continuing education. Continuing Education Credits (CECs) can be submitted for approval online in your IMSA profile.

Renewal After Expiration
The certification is no longer valid after the expiration date. However, you may reinstate your certification within one year of the expiration date by documenting 16 CEC hours for most certifications. If the certification is not reinstated within one year, you must renew through the normal certification process by taking the current certification exam at the highest level previously attained and paying the regular certification exam fee. Only the regular certification exam fees will be due, and retake of prerequisites will not be required. IMSA will not recognize any IMSA certificate(s) without an expiration date. 597
Haverty Court, Suite
100
Rockledge, FL
32955
321-392-0500
www.IMSAsafety.org
Name:

Alain M. Hungerford
IMIS ID:
107263
Section:

Far Western
Signature:

Certification and Expire Date
Renewal IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level I -
12/21/2025
Conforms to PennDOT Pub 408 Section 901.3(y)

STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 Attachment F
Evidence of Insurability
11/11/2024
Matsen Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3101 Concorde Drive, Suite C
McKinleyville CA 95519
Jacqueline Byrne
(707) 444-9292 (707) 444-9529
[email protected]
STC Traffic, Inc.
5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite #218
Carlsbad CA 92008
CM Vantage Specialty 15872
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 22357
Endurance American Specialty Ins. Co. 41718
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company 29424
Admiral Insurance Company 24856
CL241412590
A Y CMV-PLI-0029523-03 01/01/2024 01/01/2025
1,000,000
300,000
Excluded
1,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
B 57UECBD3533 01/01/2024 01/01/2025
1,000,000
Underinsured motorist
combined single limit
1,000,000
C ELD30003063503 01/01/2024 01/01/2025
6,000,000
6,000,000
D Y 57WECGI9278 01/01/2024 01/01/2025
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
E
Professional Liability
EO000056405-03 01/01/2024 01/01/2025
Each Claim $3,000,000
Each Aggregate $3,000,000
RE: CITYWIDE TS COORDINATION & IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP 2112) Federal Project No. HSIPL-5487(007)
The City of Jurupa Valley, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent Consultants in the role City officials are included as an additional insureds on the General Liability policy per the attached form. Primary and noncontributory is included per the attached form. 30 days notice of cancellation City of Jurupa Valley Attn: City Clerk
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley CA 92509

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A :

NAIC #
NAME:

CONTACT
(A/C, No):

FAX
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext):

PHONE

INSURED
REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR
WVD
ADDL
INSD

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person)

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOSAUTOS ONLY

NON-OWNED

SCHEDULEDOWNED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
ER
OTH-

STATUTE
PER

LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EFF

POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR
INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE
$AGGREGATE
$
OCCUR

CLAIMS-MADE
DED RETENTION $
$PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$GENERAL AGGREGATE
$PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$MED EXP (Any one person)
$EACH OCCURRENCE

DAMAGE TO RENTED
$PREMISES (Ea occurrence)

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

POLICY PRO-

JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
POLICY NUMBER: CMV-PLI-0029523-03 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 04 13
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CG 20 10 04 13 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 1 of 2 ADDITIONAL INSURED – OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS – SCHEDULED PERSON OR

ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization(s) Location(s) Of Covered Operations
Any person or organization whom you are required to
add as an additional insured to this policy under a written contract executed prior to the occurrence which results in bodily injury or property damage under Coverage A, or the offense which results in personal and advertising
injury under Coverage B.

All locations where your ongoing operations are
performed for any additional insured as specified in a
written contract.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

A. Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an additional insured the person(s) or
organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only
with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury"
caused, in whole or in part, by:

1. Your acts or omissions; or

2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your
behalf;
in the performance of your ongoing operations for
the additional insured(s) at the location(s)
designated above.

However:

1. The insurance afforded to such additional
insured only applies to the extent permitted by
law; and

2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the
insurance afforded to such additional insured
will not be broader than that which you are
required by the contract or agreement to
provide for such additional insured.

B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following additional
exclusions apply:

This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or
"property damage" occurring after:

1. All work, including materials, parts or
equipment furnished in connection with such
work, on the project (other than service,
maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or
on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the
location of the covered operations has been
completed; or

2. That portion of "your work" out of which the
injury or damage arises has been put to its
intended use by any person or organization
other than another contractor or subcontractor
engaged in performing operations for a
principal as a part of the same project.

C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following is added to
Section III – Limits Of Insurance:

Page 2 of 2 ends

If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the most we
will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the
amount of insurance:

1. Required by the contract or agreement; or

2. Available under the applicable Limits of
Insurance shown in the Declarations;
whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the
applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the
Declarations.
/0 /1 /2 /i255 /4 /5 /i255 /6 /7 /i255 /7 /8 /i255 /9 /8 /0 /10 /11 /12 /i255 /9 /i255 /13 /14 /i255/9/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /15 /13 /16 /17 /18 /19 /11 /20 /21 /i255 /5 /7 /9 /8 /22 /i255 /15/23/i255/24 /10 /25 /21 /10 /11 /12 /i255 /26 /16 /12 /27 /19 /10 /28 /21 /17 /i255 /2 /25 /29 /30 /18 /10 /25 /27 /12 /i255 /15 /13/31/16/10 /25 /17 /32 /33 /34 /35 /i255 /37 /38 /39/40/41/35 /37/42/37/38 /32 /i255 /43 /33 /44 /38/45/37/35 /i255 /32 /33 /37 /i255 /46/40/47/34 /43 /48 /49 /i255 /i255 /46 /47 /37 /44 /35 /37 /i255 /41 /37 /44 /39 /i255 /34 /32 /i255 /43 /44 /41 /37 /50 /51 /47 /47 /48 /49 /44/42/37/38 /39/42/37/38 /32 /i255 /52 /i255 /44 /39 /39 /34 /32 /34/40/38/44 /47 /i255 /34 /38 /35 /51 /41 /37 /39 /i255 /52 /i255 /46 /41 /34/42/44/41 /48 /i255 /44 /38 /39 /i255 /38/40/38/43/40/38/32 /41 /34 /53 /51 /32/40/41/48 /i255 /52 /i255 /40/32/33 /37 /41 /i255 /34 /38 /35 /51 /41 /44 /38 /43 /37 /i255 /43/40/38/39 /34 /32 /34/40/38 /35 /43 /33 /37 /39 /51 /47 /37
/44/49/2/25 /14 /13 /18/31/10/21 /19 /13 /25 /i255 /21 /13 /i255 /27 /13/31/16/28 /12 /21 /12 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /26 /27 /20 /12 /54 /30 /28 /12 /22 /i255 /19 /14 /i255 /25 /13 /21 /i255 /29 /20 /13 /55 /25 /i255 /10 /56 /13 /57 /12 /22 /i255 /55 /19 /28 /28 /i255 /56 /12 /i255 /29 /20 /13 /55 /25 /i255 /19 /25 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /58 /12 /27 /28 /10 /18 /10 /21 /19 /13 /25 /29 /59 /60 /20 /12 /i255 /14 /13 /28 /28 /13 /55 /19 /25 /11 /i255 /19 /29 /i255 /10 /54 /54 /12 /54 /i255 /21 /13 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255/61/21/20 /12 /18 /i255 /2 /25 /29 /30 /18 /10 /25 /27 /12 /i255 /15 /13 /25 /54 /19 /21 /19 /13 /25 /i255 /10 /25 /54 /i255 /29 /30 /16 /12 /18 /29 /12 /54 /12 /29 /i255 /10 /25 /17 /i255 /16 /18 /13 /57 /19 /29 /19 /13 /25 /i255 /21 /13 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /27 /13 /25 /21 /18 /10 /18 /17 /62 /i255 /i255 /46 /63 /64/65/66/63 /67 /i255 /66 /68 /69 /i255 /38 /70 /68 /71 /70 /68 /72 /63 /64 /73 /74 /72 /70 /63 /67 /i255 /34 /68 /75 /74 /63 /66 /68 /71 /76 /77 /29 /i255 /18 /12 /29 /16 /12 /27 /21 /29 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /77 /54 /54 /19 /21 /19 /13 /25 /10 /28 /i255 /2 /25 /29 /30 /18 /12 /54 /i255 /29 /20 /13 /55 /25 /i255 /19 /25 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /26 /27 /20 /12 /54 /30 /28 /12 /i255 /10 /56 /13 /57 /12 /22 /i255 /21 /20 /19 /29 /i255 /19 /25 /29 /30 /18 /10 /25 /27 /12 /i255 /19 /29 /i255 /16 /18 /19/31/10/18 /17 /i255 /21 /13 /i255 /10 /25 /54 /i255 /55 /19 /28 /28 /i255 /25 /13 /21 /i255 /29 /12 /12 /78 /i255 /27 /13 /25 /21 /18 /19 /56 /30 /21 /19 /13 /25 /i255 /14 /18 /13/31/i255/10 /25 /17 /i255 /13 /21 /20 /12 /18 /i255 /19 /25 /29 /30 /18 /10 /25 /27 /12 /i255 /10 /57 /10 /19 /28 /10 /56 /28 /12 /i255 /21 /13 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /77 /54 /54 /19 /21 /19 /13 /25 /10 /28 /i255 /2 /25 /29 /30 /18 /12 /54 /22 /i255 /16 /18 /13 /57 /19 /54 /12 /54 /i255 /21 /20 /10 /21 /62 /53/49/60/20 /12 /i255 /77 /54 /54 /19 /21 /19 /13 /25 /10 /28 /i255 /2 /25 /29 /30 /18 /12 /54 /i255 /19 /29 /i255 /10 /i255 /79 /10/31/12/54 /i255 /2 /25 /29 /30 /18 /12 /54 /i255 /30 /25 /54 /12 /18 /i255 /29 /30 /27 /20 /i255 /13 /21 /20 /12 /18 /i255 /19 /25 /29 /30 /18 /10 /25 /27 /12 /80 /i255 /10 /25 /54 /i255 /43/49/81/13 /30 /i255 /20 /10 /57 /12 /i255 /10 /11 /18 /12 /12 /54 /i255 /19 /25 /i255 /55 /18 /19 /21 /19 /25 /11 /i255 /19 /25 /i255 /10 /i255 /27 /13 /25 /21 /18 /10 /27 /21 /i255 /13 /18 /i255 /10 /11 /18 /12 /12/31/12/25 /21 /i255 /21 /20 /10 /21 /i255 /21 /20 /19 /29 /i255 /19 /25 /29 /30 /18 /10 /25 /27 /12 /i255 /55 /13 /30 /28 /54 /i255 /56 /12 /i255 /16 /18 /19/31/10/18 /17 /i255 /10 /25 /54 /i255 /55 /13 /30 /28 /54 /i255 /25 /13 /21 /i255 /29 /12 /12 /78 /i255 /27 /13 /25 /21 /18 /19 /56 /30 /21 /19 /13 /25 /i255 /14 /18 /13/31/i255/10 /25 /17 /i255 /13 /21 /20 /12 /18 /i255 /19 /25 /29 /30 /18 /10 /25 /27 /12 /i255 /10 /57 /10 /19 /28 /10 /56 /28 /12 /i255 /21 /13 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /10 /54 /54 /19 /21 /19 /13 /25 /10 /28 /i255 /19 /25 /29 /30 /18 /12 /54 /59 /77 /28 /28 /i255 /13 /21 /20 /12 /18 /i255 /21 /12 /18/31/29/i255 /10 /25 /54 /i255 /27 /13 /25 /54 /19 /21 /19 /13 /25 /29 /i255 /13 /14 /i255 /21 /20 /12 /i255 /16 /13 /28 /19 /27 /17 /i255 /18 /12/31/10/19 /25 /i255 /30 /25 /27 /20 /10 /25 /11 /12 /54 /59 /44 /69 /69 /64 /72 /64 /70 /68 /66 /82 /i255 /34 /68 /75 /74 /63 /76 /69 /83 POLICY NUMBER: CMV-PLI-0029523-03
City of Jurupa Valley
STC Traffic, Inc. | City of Jurupa Valley – Construction Management & Inspection Services CIP 21112 Attachment G
Required Subconsultant Information (Exhibit D)
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services
-20-
Request for Proposals Construction Management Services

EXHIBIT D

REQUIRED SUBCONSULTANT INFORMATION
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP

ICCS, LLC N/A
951-532-6483
PO Box 6211
Norco CA 92860
Review of State, Federal & blended
projects DAS 140 & 142 forms, Certified
Payroll Reporting, Statement of
Compliance & Statement of Non-
Performance Reporting, verifying correct
prevailing wages and classifications and
Fringe Benefit Statements. We also have
extensive knowledge on invoicing, grant
reporting, and production of many other
required documents.

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.G
A

WARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL
& DATA, INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SIGNAL HEAD UPGRADES (CIP #21112)
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council award a construction contract to Crosstown Electrical & Data, Inc. in the amount of $1,865,590 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination.
2) Approve a project contingency in the amount of $186,559 (10% of bid amount) 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
Cit
y Council approved CIP Project No. 21112, Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades (the “Project”) as part of Fiscal Year 202 3-2024 through Fiscal Year 2027- 2028 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”). The Project will improve City Traffic Operations and Traffic Safety by interconnecting the traffic signals within the City’s network.

On October 01, 2024, staff published a Notice of Inviting Bids (NIB) for the installation of the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades project on the City’s PlanetBids portal, a web-based procurement and bidding system.

The Project includes the installation of higher visibility retroreflective signal head back plates., installation of new 2 inch conduit, install of new mule tape, install new tracer wire, install/replacement of pull boxes, install of new fiber optic cable (SMFOC), install of strand SMFOC, install of new SMFOC, cable splicing/splice closures, install of new fiber

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
distribution units (FDU), installation of new wireless ethernet radios, and the interconnect of 89 signals that will improve traffic flow throughout the City.

T
he project will also include procurement of the necessary equipment to implement the planned improvements. Staff initiated a separate formal bid notice for the equipment as this will help the City save time and keep the project within budget, Staff will recommend its award to the City Council as an independent action.

A
dditionally, staff has issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Construction Management and Inspection (CM/CI) services. Staff is recommending the award to the successful consultant as a separate City Council action.

AN
ALYSIS
F
ormal bidding procedures were followed in accordance with the Public Contract Code .

The City received f ive (5) bids on October 30, 2024, and bids were opened soon after 2:00 p.m. with the following results:

Bidder Total Amount

1. Crosstown Electrical & Data Inc., Irwindale, CA $1,865,590.00

2. High Light Electric Inc., Colton, CA $2,409,064.00

3. Elecnor Belco Inc., Chino, CA $2,465,782.00

4. DBX Inc., Temecula, CA $2,526,800.00

5. Comet Electric Inc., Chatsworth, CA $3,624,713.00
A
ll bids were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Crosstown Electrical & Data, Inc., was deemed the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with a bid in the amount of $1,865,590.00 for equipment installation.

I
f approved, the construction will start in January 2025 with anticipated completion by December 2025
T
he project was evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is categorically exempt. This finding is based on Section 15304 which covers the reconstruction or replacement of existing structures.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
T
he Agreement has a not -to-exceed amount of $ 1,865,590.00, with an additional 10% contingency bringing the total approval amount to $2,025,150. If approved, the services will be funded by $2,028,8 00 in Highway Safety Improvement Program ("HSIP") g rant funds. T his grant requires a 50% local match. T he local match will be funded by American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. The total matching funds from ARPA will be in the amount of $1,026,075. There will not be any financial impact to the City’s G eneral Fund.

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
D
ATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO.14.H
RE

SOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N O. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE

LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE); GENERALLY LOCATED AT

THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLAY STREET AND GENERAL ROAD

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-130, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024- 012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST

SELF STORAGE) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE)

BACKGROUND
The State Legislature enacted the Mello- Roos Act of 1982 (the "Act") to assist public agencies in financing certain public services. The legal property owner, NWB Jurupa Valley LLC, requested that the City assist them in forming a district for the City to mitigate public safety impacts created by the new development within the West Coast Self Storage project area.

The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act") authorizes the initiation of the establishment of community facilities districts upon receipt by the City of a petition requesting institution of proceedings by owners of not less than 10% of the area of land

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
proposed to be included within the district. The City has received the signed petition from the landowners.

The CFD boundary includes the area within a project area known as West Coast Self Storage (Assessor Parcel Number 163 -400-047). The project includes three (3) stand- alone mini self -storage buildings ( light industrial). Each building’s proposed use and square footage are as follows:

Building Proposed Use Building Size
(Square Feet)
Building A Warehouse Self Storage 33,000
Building B Warehouse Self Storage 21,863
Building C Warehouse Self Storage 5,800
T otal 60,663
The CFD is comprised of approximately 2.80 gross taxable acres.

The CFD will set up a special tax to generally cover costs associated with providing law enforcement protection services, including but not limited to:
• The costs of contracting services.
• Equipment, vehicles and supplies.
• The salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide police protection services and other services as defined herein, respectively. • City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District. • All other services necessary or useful for, or in connection with, the authorized services listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement and maintenance and for anticipated operating cost shortfalls.

ANALYSIS
Approval of the attached Resolution is required under the Act to levy a special tax and fund certain services. The attached Resolution declares the City Council's intention to form the proposed CFD No. PS 2024- 012 (Public Safety, West Coast Self Storage) and to authorize the levy of a special tax in accordance with the attached Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. The attached Resolution is the initial step for forming the CFD pursuant to the procedures prescribed by the Act, which include holdi ng a public hearing and submitting the formation of the proposed CFD to the landowners at a special election to be conducted by mailed ballot.

The FY 24-25 base year special tax was set in the following amount:

Page | 3

SPECIAL
TAX
Single Family Residential Property (Dwelling Unit) $343.00 Multifamily Residential Property (Dwelling Unit) $206.00 Commercial Retail Property (Building Square Feet) $0.126 Commercial Other Property (Building Square Feet) $0.094 Business Park Property (Building Square Feet) $0.084
Light Industrial Property (Building Square Feet) $0.044 Heavy Industrial Property (Building Square Feet) $0.037 These rates will increase based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area, with a maximum annual increase of 6% and a minimum annual increase of 2% of the Maximum Special Tax in effect in the previous fiscal year, beginning July 1, 2025. The owners have filed a petition representing their willingness to move forward. Due to the timing of the district formation, the first year of levied special tax will be FY 2025-2026.

OTHER INFORMATION
A public hearing on this matter will take place on February 6, 2025 at 7:00 pm or as soon thereafter and at that time, the Council will hear any testimony concerning the formation and take action to adopt the "Resolution of Formation." Page | 4

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The individual property owners are responsible for the annual payments of special taxes.

The City will work with the County concerning the filing of the annual special tax to the County Auditor-Controller. At base year the estimated maximum annual assessment for CFDPS 2024-012 is expected to be $2,669.17, as summarized below:

APN Land Use
Tax per
Taxable Unit
Building
Square
Footage
FY 2024-25
Assessment
163-400-047 Light Industrial $0.044 33,000 $1,452.00
163-400-047 Light Industrial $0.044 21,863 $961.97
163-400-047 Light Industrial $0.044 5,800 $255.20
The property owners posted a deposit with its application to form the CFD in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the formation. Approval of this resolution does not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability by the CFD. The City's cost to administer the CFD annually will be reimbursed through the special taxes charged to property owners.

The revenue and expense will be part of the City's FY2025- 2026 adopted budget and there are no additional fiscal impacts.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide staff with further direction.
******************
******** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-130

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TO ESTABLISH CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024- 012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE ) AND TO

AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024- 012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE)

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, this City Council (the "Ci ty Council") of the City of Jurupa Valley (the "City") has received a petition (the "Petition") requesting the institution of proceedings, which is signed by the owner of the land proposed for inclusion in a proposed community facilities district (the "Owner") and which meet the requirements of Sections 53318 and 53319 of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and

WHEREAS, the Act authorizes the City Council to establish a community facilities district and to levy special taxes within that district; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with the request set forth in the Petition, the City Council desires to undertake proceedings to establish a community facilities district pursuant to the Act to finance certain services which are in addition to services currently provided in the territory of the proposed district and are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of the development of such land;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY:

1. Intention. The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct proceedings for the formation of a community facilities district under the terms of the Act.

2. Name of District. The name of the proposed community facilities district is "City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-012 (Public Safety, West Coast Self Storage)" (the "District").

3. Boundaries of District. The exterior boundaries of the District are shown on the map now on file in the office of the City Clerk entitled "Proposed Boundary of Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-012 (Public Safety, West Coast Self Storage)" (the "Map"). The Map indicates by a boundary line, the extent of the territory included in the proposed District and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the District. On the original and one copy of the Map, the City Clerk shall endorse the certificate evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution. The City Clerk shall file the original of the Map in her office and, within fifteen days after the adoption of this Resolution, the City Clerk shall file a copy of the Map so endorsed in t he records of the County -2-
Recorder, County of Riverside, State of California, and in any event this Map shall be filed no later than fifteen days before the public hearing specified in Section 6 below.

4. Services. The type of services proposed to be provide d within the District and to be financed under the Act shall consist of those set forth on Exhibit "A" (the "Services"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Services are in addition to services currently provided in the District and are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of the development occurring in the District.

5. Special Tax.

a. Except where funds are otherwise available to pay for the Services, it is the intention of the City Council, commencing Fiscal Year 2025-2026, to levy annually in accordance with procedures contained in the Act a special tax (the "Special Tax") within the District sufficient to pay for the costs thereof, including incidental expenses. The types of incidental expenses proposed to be incurred are set forth in Exhibit "B." The Special Tax will be secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the District and will be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, or in such other manner as may be provided by the City Council including, without limitation, direct billing of the affected property owner, and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem property taxes. In the first year in which the Special Tax is levied, the levy shall include a sum sufficient to repay to the City all amounts, if any, transferred to the District pursuant to Section 53314 of the Act and interest thereon.

b. The proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax (the "Rate and Method") among parcels of real property in the District, in sufficient detail to allow each resident or landowner within the proposed District to estimate the maximum amount such resident or owner will have to pay, is shown in Exhibit "C," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The City Council hereby determines the Rate and Method set forth in Exhibit "C" to be reasonable.

6. Hearing. A public hearing on the establishment of the District, the extent of the District, the furnishing of Services within the District, and the proposed Rate and Method (the "Hearing") shall be held on February 6, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practicable, at the Jurupa Valley City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite, Jurupa Valley, California 92509. At the Hearing, any interested person or taxpayer, including all persons owning lands or registered to vote within the proposed District, may appear and be heard.

7. Report. T he Staff of the City is directed to study the proposed District and prepare for filing at the Hearing the report required by Section 53321.5 of the Act. The staff of the City may delegate to consultants of the City the duty to perform the study and prepare the report.

8. Advances. The City may accept advances of funds or work in -kind from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or private entities, and is authorized and directed to -3-
use such funds or that work in -kind for any authorized purpose, including, but not limited to, paying any cost incurred by the City in creating the District. The City may enter into an agreement with the person or entity advancing the funds or work-in-kind, to repay all or a portion of the funds advanced, or to reimburse the person or entity for the value, or cost, whichever is less, of the work- in-kind, as determined by the City Council, with or without interest.

9. Published Notice. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish a notice of the Hearing ("Notice") pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code in a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the proposed District. Such Notice shall be substantially in the form specified in Section 53322 of the Act. Publication of the N otice shall be completed at least seven days prior to the date of the Hearing.

10. Mailed Notice. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a copy of the Notice of the Hearing by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to each registered voter and to each landowner within the proposed District as shown on the last equalized assessment roll. Mailing of the Notice shall be completed at least fifteen days prior to the date of the Hearing.

11. Voting. Should the City Council determine to form the District, a special el ection will be held within the District to authorize the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the procedures contained in Section 53326 of the Act. If held, the proposed voting procedure at the election will be a landowner vote with each landowner who is the owner of record of land within the District at the close of the Hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, having one vote for each acre or portion thereof owned within the District. Ballots for the special election may be distributed by mail with return postage prepaid or by personal service.

12. Exemptions from Special Tax. Except as may otherwise be provided in Exhibit "C" hereto or by law, all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States, the State of California and/or the City, or any departments or political subdivisions thereof, shall be omitted from the levy of the Special Tax to be made to cover the costs and expenses of the Services. In addition, reference is hereby made to Exhibit "C" for a description of other l ands which shall be omitted from the levy of the Special Tax.

13. Election to Perform Work. Pursuant to 53329.5(c) of the Act, the City Council finds that, in its opinion, the public interest will not be served by allowing property owners in the District to enter into a contract pursuant to Section 53329.5(a).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of December, 2024.

Guillermo Silva
Mayor

-4-
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024-130 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of December, 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: BARAJAS, BERKSON, CARMONA, SANCHEZ, SILV A
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of December, 2024.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

Authorized Services for the Special Tax shall be the following:

The cost associated with providing law enforcement services, including but not limited to:

 The costs of contracting services
 Equipment, vehicles and supplies;
 The salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide law enforcement services;  City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District;  All other services necessary or useful for, or in connection with, the authorized services listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement and maintenance and for anticipated operating cost shortfalls.

B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

INCIDENTAL EXPENSES

Incidental Expenses for the Special Tax shall be the following:

The cost of the Incidental Expenses shall be the costs associated with formation of the District, determination of the amount of the Special Tax, collection of the Special Tax, payment of the Special Tax, costs incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, and the costs of engineering, inspecting, coordinating, completing, planning and designing the Services, including the costs of any environmental evaluations.

The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be incurred in the formation of the District: engineering services, publishing, mailing and posting of notices, governmental notification and filing costs, election costs, and charges and fees of the City other than those waived.

The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be inc urred in each annual Special Tax levy: necessary consultant costs, costs of posting and collecting the special taxes, and administrative costs of the City related to each annual Special Tax levy.

C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX

(Please see attached)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST

COAST SELF STORAGE) OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF

RIVERSIDE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A Special Tax (all capitalized terms are defined in Section A., "Definitions", below) shall be applicable to each Parcel of Taxable Property localed within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-012 (Public Safety, West Coast Self Storage). The amount of Special Tax to be levied on a Parcel in each Fiscal Year, commencing in Fiscal Year 2025-2026, shall be determined by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, acting in its capacity as the legislative body of the CFO by applying the appropriate Special Tax as set forth in Sections B., C., and D., below. All of the real property within the CFO, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section E. below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.

A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
"Acre or Acreage" means the land area of a Parcel as indicated on the most recent Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on the Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Map, condominium plan, or other recorded County map or the land area calculated to the reasonable satisfaction of the Administrator using the boundaries set forth on such map or plan. The square footage of a Parcel is equal to the Acreage of such Parcel multiplied by 43,560. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California.
"Administrative Expenses" means all actual or reasonably estimated costs and expenses of the City that are chargeable or allocable to carry out its duties as the administrator of the CFO as allowed by the Act, which shall include without limitation, all costs and expenses arising out of or resulting from the annual levy and collection of the Special Tax (whether by the City or designee thereof or both), any litigation or appeal involving the CFO, and other administrative expenses of the City or designee thereof, or both, directly related to the CFO. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFO for attorney's fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure as a result of delinquent Special Taxes.
"Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the annual amount of the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "Approved Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January P 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) that have not been issued a Building Permit prior to the April 1'1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. "Assessor" means the Assessor of the County.
"Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating Parcels by Assessor's Parcel Number.
"Assessor's Parcel Number" means the number assigned to a lot or Parcel for purposes of identification as determined from an Assessor Parcel Map or the applicable assessment roll.
"Base Year" means the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025. "Boundary Map" means a recorded map of the CFO which indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory identified to be subject to the levy of Special Taxes. "Building Permit" means the first legal document issued by a local agency giving official permission for new construction.
"Building Square Footage" means the floor area square footage reflected on the original construction building permit issued for construction of a building of Non-Residential Property and any Building Square Footage subsequently added to a building of such Non-Residential Property after issuance of a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building.
"Business Park Property" means Business Park land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"CFD" means Community Facilities District No. PS 2024-012 (Public Safety, West Coast Self Storage) of the City of Jurupa Valley.
"City" means the City of Jurupa Valley, California.
"Commercial Other Property" means all Commercial land uses as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended, other than Commercial Retail Property. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"Commercial Retail Property" means Commercial Retail land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"Consumer Price Index" means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistic for "All Urban Consumers in the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario Area, measured as of the month of March in the Calendar Year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Area.
"Council" means the City Council of the City acting as the legislative body of the CFO. "County" means the County of Riverside, California.
"Developed Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to January 1s t preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) for which a Building Permit for new construction has been issued prior to April 1s t preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.
"Dwelling Unit" or "(D/U)" means a residential unit that is used or intended to be used as a domicile by one or more persons, as determined by the Administrator. "Exempt Property" means any Parcel which is exempt from Special Taxes pursuant to Section E., below.
"Final Map" means a subdivision of property by recordation of an Assessor's Parcel Map or lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual lots for which Building Permits may be issued without further subdivision.
"Fiscal Year" means the 12 month period starting on July 1 of any calendar year and ending the following June 30.
"Heavy Industrial Property" means Heavy Industrial land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"Incidental Expenses" means the costs associated with formation of the District, determination of the amount of the Special Tax, collection of the Special Tax, payment of the Special Tax, costs incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, and the costs of engineering, inspecting, coordinating, completing, planning and designing the Services, including the costs of any environmental evaluations. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1 of Section C. below. "Light Industrial Property" means Light Industrial land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"Maximum Special Tax" means for each Parcel in each Fiscal Year, the greatest amount of Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C, below, which may be levied on such Parcel in such Fiscal Year
"Multifamily Residential Property" means all Multifamily Residential land uses as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended, and consisting of a building or buildings comprised of attached Dwelling Units available for rental by the general public, not for sale to an end user, and under common management. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"Parcel(s)" means a lot or parcel within the CFO shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel Number valid as of July 1 st for the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied.
"Property Owner's Association Property" means all Parcels which have been conveyed, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, prior to April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.
"Proportionately" means for Parcels of Taxable Property that are (i) Single Family Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Single Family Property, (ii) Multifamily Residential Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Multifamily Residential Property, (iii) Non-Residential Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Non-Residential Property and (iv) Approved Property, that the r.atio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Approved Property. "Public Property" means all Parcels which, as of April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, are (i) used for rights-of-way or any other purpose and is owned by, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the County, City or any other public agency, provided, however, that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use; or (ii) encumbered by an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than
the purpose set forth in the easement.
"Residential Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended with one or more residential Dwelling Units. If
the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"Single Family Residential Property" means all Single Family land uses as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended, including condominiums, and excluding Multifamily Residential Property. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
"Special Tax(es)" means the Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D. "Special Tax Requirement" means for each Fiscal Year, that amount required to: (i) pay the estimated cost of Special Tax Services for such Fiscal Year as determined by the City; (ii) pay amount required to establish or replenish any reserve fund established in connection with the CFO, (iii) pay Administrative Expenses; (iv) pay for the actual or anticipated shortfall due to Special Tax delinquencies in the current or prior Fiscal Year; and (v) less a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy as determined by the Administrator.
"Special Tax Services" means the cost associated with providing law enforcement services, including but not limited to (i) the costs of contracting services, (ii) equipment, vehicles, supplies, (iii) the salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide law enforcement services, (iv) City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District, (v) all other services necessary or useful for, or in connection with, the authorized services listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement and maintenance and for anticipated operating cost shortfalls, and (vi) Incidental Expenses.
"State" means the State of California.
"Taxable Property" means all Parcels within the boundary of the CFO pursuant to the Boundary Map which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section E., below.
"Taxable Unit" means either a Dwelling Unit, Building Square Footage, Parcel, lot or an Acre, as shown in Table 1 or Table 2.
"Undeveloped Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Public Property or Property Owner's Association Property.

B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CLASS
Each Fiscal Year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all Parcels of Taxable Property shall be classified as either Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, Public
Property or Property Owner's Association Property, and
subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C. and D.

Parcels of Developed Property shall further be classified as Residential Property or Non-Residential Property. Parcels of Residential Property shall further be classified as Single Family Property or Multifamily Residential Property.

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

1. Developed Property
The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied and escalated, as explained further in Section C.1. (a) below, in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be determined by reference to Table 1 below.

Land
Use
Class
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 (a)
TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed
Property for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Taxable Description Unit
Single Family Residential Property Dwelling
Unit
Multifamily Residential Property Dwelling
Unit
Building
Commercial Retail Property Square
Footaqe
Building
Commercial Other Property Square
Footaae
Building
Business Park Property Square
Footaqe
Building
Light Industrial Property Square
Footaqe
Building
Heavy Industrial Property Square
Footaqe
Increase in the Maximum Special Tax
Maximum
Special Tax per
Taxable Unit
$ 343.00
$ 206.00
$ 0.126
$ 0.094
$ 0.084
$ 0.044
$ 0.037
On each July 1, following the Base Year, the Maximum Special Tax, identified in Table 1, above, shall be increased annually, commencing July 1, 2025, based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax in effect in the previous Fiscal Year. (b) Multiple Land Use Classes
In some instances, a Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied on such Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax that can be levied for each Land Use Class located on that Parcel. For a Parcel that contains more than one Land Use Class, the Acreage of such Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Parcel. The Administrator's allocation to each Land Use Class shall be final.

2. Approved Property
The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied and escalated, as explained further in Section C.2. (a) below, in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel classified as Approved Property shall be determined by reference to Table 2 below.

Land
TABLE 2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Approved
Property for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Maximum Taxable Use Description Unit Special Tax per
Class Taxable Unit
8 Approved Property Parcel $ 100.00
(a) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax
On each July 1, following the Base Year, the Maximum Special Tax, identified in Table 1, above, shall be increased annually, commencing July 1, 2025, based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax in effect in the previous Fiscal Year.

3. Undeveloped Property
No Special Tax shall be levied on Undeveloped Property.

D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and for each following Fiscal Year, the
Administrator shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property until the amount of Special Tax equals the Special Tax Requirement in accordance with the following steps:

First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax as needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement; and
Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Approved Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Approved Property. Notwithstanding the forgoing sentence, no Special Tax shall be levied on Approved Property to fund items (ii) and (iii) of the Special Tax Requirement.

E. EXEMPTIONS
The CFO shall not levy Special Taxes on Public Property and Property Owner's Association Property within the CFO.

F. MANNER OF COLLECTION
The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner. and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency; provided, however, that the Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the CFO, and provided further that the CFO may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on Parcels having delinquent Special Taxes as permitted by the Act.

G. APPEALS
Any taxpayer may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on his/her Parcel(s) with the Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. During pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes must be paid on or before the payment due date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the Administrator agrees with the appellant, the Administrator shall grant a credit to eliminate or reduce future Special Taxes on the appellant's Parcel(s). No refunds of previously paid Special Taxes shall be made.

The Administrator shall interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment and make determinations relative to the annual levy and administration of the Special Tax and any taxpayer who appeals, as herein specified.

H. PREPAYMENT
The Special Taxes may not be prepaid.

I. TERM OF THE SPECIAL TAX
The Special Tax shall be levied annually in perpetuity unless terminated earlier by the City.

LIMONITE AVE

VICINITY MAP

NOTTO SCALE
Legend
.l ___ ,.I Special Tax Boundary
'-I __ _JI Parcel Boundary

ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER LOCATED

WITHIN PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
CFD PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC SAFETY,

WEST COAST SELF STORAGE) AS OF
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
163-400-04 7
=I Harris & Associates

PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012
{PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE)

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
--------
163-400-047

CLAY STREET GENERAL ROAD
2375 Northside Dr #125, S;in Diego, CA 92108 p: 619.236.1778 ext.1261 www.WeAreHards.com

THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF

EACH LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN ON THIS MAP SHALL BE THOSE LINES AND DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN ON THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAPS.

A +see

CLERK'S MAP STATEMENT

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY THIS _DAY OF ____ 2024.

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

CLERK'S MAP STATEMENT

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE AREA SHOWN ON THIS MAP

OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012 {PUBLIC SAFETY,

WEST COAST SELF STORAGE), CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPAVALLEYAT A REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING
THEREOF, HELD ON THE_ DAY OF __ _
--- 2024 BY ITS RESOLUTION NO.

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

COUNTY RECORDER'S FILING STATEMENT
FILED THIS ____ DAY OF ____ 2024
AT THE HOUR OF __ O'CLOCK _.M. IN BOOK
___ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICTS PAGE NO._ IN THE OFFICE OF

THE COUNTY RECORDER IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

PETER ALDANA

COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY:

DEPUTY
FILE: ___________ _
Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.I
AW

ARD TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TO
SWARCO M CCAIN INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL

COORDINATION AND SIGNAL HEAD UPGRADES (EQUIPMENT) (CIP
#21112)
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council award a traffic equipment procurement contract to Swarco McCain Inc . in the amount of $4 21,682.74 for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination (Equipment).
2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
Cit
y Council approved project #21112, Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades (the “Project”) as part of Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 through Fiscal Year 202 7-2028 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”). The Project will improve C ity traffic operations and traffic safety by interconnecting the traffic signals within the City ’s network.

On November 5 , 2024, staff published a Notice of Inviting Bids (NIB) to procure the necessary equipment for the Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades. The notice was published on the City’s PlanetBids portal, a web- based procurement and bidding system. The equipment list includes higher visibility retroreflective signal head back plates, conduits, mule tape, tracer wire, pull boxes, fiber optic cables, and other upgrades designed to optimize traffic flow across the city.

The equipment is being procured separately to save time and stay within budget. Staff issued a formal bid for installation, and the construction contract is being recommended for approval as a separate City Council action.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
Staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Construction Management and Inspection (CM/CI) services. Staff is also recommending the award to the successful consultant as a separate City Council action.

AN
ALYSIS
F
ormal bidding procedures were followed in accordance with the Public Contract Code .

The City received two (2) bids on December 3, 2024, and bids were opened soon after 4:00 p.m. with the following results:

Bidder Total Amount

1. SWARCO McCain Inc., Vista, CA $421,682.74

2. Bart Richard Woodward Corp., Medaryville, IN
(non-responsive)
Invalid
A
ll bids were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. SWARCO McCAIN INC. , was deemed the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with a bid in the amount of $421,682.74 for the equipment. Bart Richard Woodward Corporation was determined to be non-responsive due to their failure to submit proposals for all bid items listed in the bid schedule.

I
f approved, the equipment is tentatively scheduled to be delivered by May 2025 and the anticipated completion is December 2025.

T
he project was evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is categorically exempt. This finding is based on Section 15304 which covers the reconstruction or replacement of existing structures.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
T
he Agreement has a not-to-exceed amount of $421,682.74. $210,841.37 is budgeted in the Highway Safety Improvement Program (“HSIP”), Account No. 150-1550-71398. HSIP funding requires a fifty percent (50%) local match, which is budgeted in the American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”), Account No. 252-2526-71398. There will be no impact to the City’s General Fund.
*********************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE ************************* epu y irector of Public
Works/Assistant City Engineer
Reviewed by:

S s n Paragas
Fi ance Director
Reviewed by:

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Attachments:

Reviewed by:

Reviewed by:
·chael Flad
Assistant City Manager
Submitted by:

Rod B. Butler
City Manager

1. Agreement, Project CIP #21112, Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination And Signal Head Upgrades (Equipment)
Page I 3
www.jurupavalley.org -

P
age | 1
S

TAFF REPORT
D
ATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.J
APPRO
VAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 3 8171 COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES

LOCATED EAST OF LIMONITE AVENUE FRONTAGE ROAD AND WEST

OF RIVERVIEW DRIVE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION,

APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE
OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve Tract Map 38171 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. A
ccept the real property described as an easement for public street and utility purposes for Lot “A” ( Saddlehorn Lane) and Lot “B” (Riverview Drive).
b. Accept the real property described as a storm drain easement for public purposes.
c. Accept the reciprocal access easement for ingress, egress and emergency vehicle access.
d. Accept Lot 32 for infiltration basin, water quality and open space purposes.

2. A
uthorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38171

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

RETURN TO AGENDA
P
age | 2

BACKGROUND
On February 15, 2024, the Jurupa Valley City Council approved TTM No. 3 8171 for Countryside Estates formerly known as Saddlehorn Ranch. The subdivision consists of

19.36 combined acres into 31 single family lots. The project site is bounded by Riverview Drive from the east and Limonite Frontage Road from the west.

S
taff have reviewed Tract Map 38171 and finds that it is in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved to form the Subdivision Agreements. This action approves the Tract Map, Subdivision Agreements, and accepts offers of dedication and the bonds related to the subdivision.

AN
ALYSIS
Pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City Municipal Code Title 7, Tract Maps require City Council action for approval, denial, or modifications. Per the Subdivision Map Act Section 66474.1, a legislative body shall not deny approval of a Tract Map if it was previously approved a tentative tract map for the proposed subdivision and if it finds that the Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the previously approved tentative tract map. Staff recommend that the City Council approve Tract Map No. 38171 and accept the offers of dedication, relinquishment of access rights, the subdivision agreements, and bonds.

INANCIAL IMPACT
The City will receive development fees and payments as part of the obligations defined in the Municipal Code.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve Agreement as recommended.

2. P
rovide alternate direction to staff.
******************
****SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE**********************

NUMBERED LOTS: 32
LETTERED LOTS: 2
IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 6 SHEETS

RECORDER'S STATEMENT
GROSS AREA: 19.365 ACRES
NET AREA: 16.865 ACRES TRACT NO. 38171
FILED THIS __ DAY OF ________ 2024,
AT _____ .M. IN BOOK _____ OF MAPS,
AT PAGES ______ AT THE REQUEST OF THE
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF AMENDED MAP OF THE RIVERVIEW TRACT, IN THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY.

OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, NO.

PAGE 58 OF MAPS RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ALSO BEING PARCEL 2 OF LOT LINE FEE:

ADJUSTMENT NO. 4091, AS EVIDENCED BY NOTICE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED JULY 8, 1999 AS PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR-COUNTY INSTRUMENT NO. '1999-304302 OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID CLERK-RECORDER COUNTY IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH RANGE 5 WEST, S.B.M. BY: ________ _, DEPUTY HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. DATE OF SURVEY: JANUARY, 2022 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE BY:

OWNERS' STATEMENT:

WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WlTHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT I WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WlTH IN THE DISTINCTIVIE BORDER LINE.

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:

LOT "A" (SADDLEHORN LANE) AND LOT "B" (RIVIERVIEW DRIVIE). THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC STIREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

AS A CONDITION OF DEDICATION OF LOT "B", OWNERS OF LOTS 31 AND 32 ABUTTING THIS HIGHWAY AND DURING SUCH TIME WlLL HAVIE NO RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVIEL ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WlDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHAUL TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATED.

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBIJC PURPOSES:

THE EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP.

WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY THE RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN HEREON, FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND EMERGENCY VIEHICLE ACCESS.

WE HEREBY RESERVIE TO OURSELVIES, OUR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE DEDICATED BY SEPARATE INSTIRUMENT TO HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION.

WE HEREBY DEOl«:ll1£ TO 1'tt£ 01'l' or JUfUPA V#lu.E't LOT )2 PURPOSES •.

FOR INFILTIRATION BASIN FOR OPEN SPACE

WE HEREBY RESERVIE TO OURSELVIES, OUR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS AN EASEMENT FOR WATER AND ACCESS PURPOSES AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE DEDICATED BY SEPARATE INSTIRUMENT TO HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION.

WE HEREBY RESERVIE TO OURSELVIES, OUR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS AN EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS PURPOSES AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE DEDICATED BY SEPARATE INSTIRUMENT TO HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION.

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES: TO RUBIDOUX COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ("DISTRICT"), A PUBLIC AGENCY OF THE STATIE OF CALIFORNIA, ITS

SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY TO CONSTIRUCT, MAINTAIN, ENLARGE,

RECONSTRUCT, REMOVE AND REPLACE, OPERATE, INSPECT, REPAIR, IMPROVE AND RELOCATE SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES, ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND DESIGNATED "SEWER AND ACCESS EASEMENT" AND "WATER AND ACCESS EASEMENT" HEREON, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXERCISING THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN SAID EASEMENT. OWNER

RETAINS THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENT AREA PROVIDED THAT OWNER SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT OR ERECT

BUILDINGS, MASONRY WALLS, MASONRY FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, OR PLANT OR

GROW TREES OR SHRUBS, OR CHANGE THE SURFACE GRADE OR INSTALL PRIVATELY-OWNED PIPELINES WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF DISTIRICT.

OWNER:

GDC-RCH COUNTRYSIDE, LP A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BY: COUNTRYSIDE GP, LLC

A CALIFORNIA LIMITIED LIABILITY COMPANY,
ITS
8 :ENER&.c.--------

ROGER CRAIG HOBBS, MANAGER
BENEFICIARY:

HOMESTREET BANK, A WASHINGTON STATE CHARTERED COMMERCIAL BANK, ITS SUCCESSORS,

PARTICIPANTS AND ASSIGNS BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2024-0293295 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

M
~ • BY·
-~o I,...,,..,.,..

TITLE: ytC/: ~,-
BY: _____________ _
NAME:

TITLE:

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE

IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATIE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OFCa.11/tJrl'liQ.}
COUNTY OF Ort;,,r,Je.,,
ss.

ON l 1ove.mberlo,:;2o'4-BEFORE ME, Ttmvy Ann Mvu/er , A NOTARY PUBIJC, PERSONALLY APPEARED ---'--"'~'--"""--"-.L.J ....... "4--..L.L.-........,_ _____________ _ ~.0 PROVED TO ME ON THE BAS OF SAllSFII TORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSO~WHOSE NAME~ US{ARE SUBSCRIBED TO~WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HI HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY.QB;. AND THAT B HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S'.) ON THE I RUMENT THE PERSON~. OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON~ ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TIRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND:

SIGNATUREr~-t:f'YJ.«e~
NOTARY PLJCIN~FOR SAID STATE
Timv!f (~A~M~~ftf
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS
IN OranJ e-- COUNTY.

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: dC/.f:Z.3/Zfo
MY COMMISSION NO.:.:l.4 /1'-104-

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE

IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATIE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF Co.1,·1omio.}
COUNTY OF 0~C)llj'C..
ss.

TM
ON M',ven,J,e.,,ta.,202,f8EFORE ME, -A- t1m.uy Ann /...fuf,/lf.Y . A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED Anthony Lopilato
;t(~9 PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON~OSE NAME¢ <J.SlARE SUBSCRIBED TO~ WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN /HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(~), AND THAT BY I HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(~ ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON,k,8?, OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF O WHICH THE PERSON~ ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND:

SIGNATURE -um,~ 'W<"''./IA..-NOTARY P~LIC IN A FR AioSTATE

MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS
IN OYOJn, (., COUNTY.

Ttrnt,'j A. M.u1.tllf.Y MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: IJftL'S I 2(,,, 6 I MY COMMISSION NO.:..l4fl-;a9'04:
(NAME PRINTIED)

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE. I

HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTIER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS

INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE MONUMENT

AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE

THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.

DATED:. NOVEMBER 5, 2024
✓ e-t:-- 11/o!;/4oz.s
ROBERT L. WHEELER IV, L.S. 8639

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT

I, VIRPAL SINGH TOOR, HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN MAP, THAT THE

SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE

TRACT MAP AND ANY APPROVIED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, AND THAT ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVIE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

DATED:-----~ 2024
VIRPAL SINGH TOOR, RCE 46281

CITY ENGINEER

CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
I, DENNIS W. JANDA, HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN MAP, AND I AM SATISFIED THAT SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.

BY~.,
DEN1'IBW. ~ ~

CITY SURVEYOR

CITY COUNCIL'S STATMENT

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVIERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY COUNCIL,

HEREBY APPROVIES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION MADE HEREON FOR PUBLIC STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. THE COUNCIL DECLARES THAT THE ACCEPTANCE OF

THE OFFER(S) IS TO VEST TITLE IN THE CITY ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC FOR SAID PURPOSES BUT

THAT SAID STREET(S) SHALL NOT BECOME PART OF THE CITY MAINTAINED STREET SYSTIEM UNTIL ACCEPTED BY RESOLUTION OF THIS COUNCIL ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1806 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE.

THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES LOT "A" (SADDLEHORN LANE) AND LOT "B" (RIVIERVIEW DRIVIE).

THE EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN AND OFFERED HEREON IS HEREBY ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS.

THE RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS.

LOT 3'2. FoR INFILTA."TION ~SIN FoR OP£N Sf'AC.E pv~,c,~ES.

DATED: ____________ _, 2024 ATTIEST:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY CLERK ,,;: f<'> -:' -~/1~.:i~J:;,/.~.(~, '
BY: ___________ _
1;//Jt·' •'
BY: ,,i,· ...

GUILLERMO SILVA, MAYOR v1cToR1lWAsko. c1TY cLERK
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE· < , ✓:, • ~=-=---=-===--'--='-'-'-'~~~~~~· ••.· .. · ... . · . ,lf5:yff.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS:OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN ... MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS_GOLLECTED AS TAXES, "E'.XCEPT TAXES 0R SPECIAL ,A,e,li,li:££MENTS 00LLEGTED ,t,,f,; TAXFS NOW A I IEf>I, mfr • MOT te'.T fi'A'i'ABLE, 'liq 1101 l ARE E31'1MATED +0 BE $ __ Ci,;.vD T A BOND IN THE SUM OF $. ___ H
WITH THE ISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RI '--""·L . ,'CONDITIONED UPON THE PA ES, STATE, COUNT AL, AND ALL,., ~ECIAL
ASSESSMENTS COLL . . . . F THIS MAP WITH THE

COUNTY RECORDER ARE T NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID
BOND HAS BEEN DULY A SUPERVISORS.

DATE: ______ ~

CASH OR SURETY TAX

MATTHEW JENNING

COUNTY TAX ECTOR

RUBIDOUX COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTS ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT

I HEREBY STATIE THAT THE EASEMENTS DEDICATED ON THIS MAP TO THE RUBIDOUX COMMUNITY

SERVICES DISTRICT ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AND THE DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS ,, Y AUTH R1ZED OFFICER .
.. , " ~ ./ " /7 / " ., / ~( /
,,>;,""" ~ 2~- ~
fa );:.~~ ,..----'-/ DATE: //-

JOH SKERBELIS, PRESIDENT OF THE RUBIDOUX

COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
__ DATE:
jlf{ ' R.(LAClDUSAW, GENERAL MANAGER OF RUBIDOUX •
te'OMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
SCHEDULE "B"
SEC. 20, T 2S R5W s.aM.

FOR INFILTRATION BASIN, WATER QUALITY & OPEN SPACE PURPOSES.

ACCEPTED
’
0 Ge

EMERY ST
\___.1.---JGc
MAVERICK LN °

VICINITY MAP
NTS
(t.=1°20'40" R=l 640.00' L=38.48' R4, R7)
t.=1°24'03" R=1640.00' L=40.09' -~:.~~:---\
N17°33'39"W RAD R=1640.00' \ \
N30°33'59"W RAD R=1576.00' ',, ', '
N18°57' 42"W
/ RAD

IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 38171
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF AMENDED MAP OF THE RIVERVIEW TRACT, IN THE

BOUNDARY MAP AND SHEET INDEX MAP
(i) INDICATES SHEET NUMBER
----- INDICATES SHEET LIMIT
' .... \
.. ,:\
N68'58'oo·w 462.65' (462.61' R3) _ 9
>---~---""'T"----"T""-----,~----,- ', (N40°03'00"E 24.63' R7) ___ :> N40'39'34"E (24.63' R3)

EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY

AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
146/301 O.R. 11/28/1933 ~~-------L
LIMONITE ROAD PER PARCEL 2,-=:----
2770/357 JJLY 1960 O.R.

Mi
~"-,
"-' ·• 'l:'
-~ 16 .~
'I,.
' N35°00'43"W
~ RAD
bo\_SEE SHEET 6
'?:,. FOR EASEMENT G
'b, DATA
M1 LINE TABLE-THIS SHEET ONLY CURVE TABLE-THIS SHEET ONLY

LINE I BEARING I LENGTH CURVE I DELTA I RADIUS I LENGTH L1 I N57'09'06"W I 90.00' C1 I 11°35•24• I 300.00· I 60.77' 17 18 19 M11
20 © N53,1 ,
~!-~~ --- @
~~150J1'19• ~---.1. ____ _J_ _____ _l _____ _J _____ _l _ _:::_---:
~":1~8:_00' -1--1----- LOT A N68°45'30"W 1196.97' L _,
I ~ SADDLEHORN LANE PUBLIC STREET DEDICATED HEREON
21 22 21 24 25 26 27 28
0 50 100
SCALE: 1 " = 1 oo'
29 30
----...
200
Cl
C1J
31 ,_
0 -.I
-.-----,--------;--------r------,-----r-------
15 14 13 12
MONUMENT NOTES:

SET 2" I.P. TAGGED L.S. 8639 OR 1" I.P. TAGGED L.S. 8639 OR LEAD, TACK & TAG L.S. 8639 OR NAIL & TAG L.S. 8639 OR 8" SPIKE & WASHER STAMPED L.S. 8639 FLUSH AT ALL LOT CORNERS, ANGLE POINTS IN SIDE OR REAR LOT LINES AND ANGLES POINTS IN SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.

SET LEAD, TACK & TAG LS. 8639 IN TOP OF CURB (RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD "E") ON SIDE LOT LINES PROJECTED AND FOR BCS, ECS, PCCS, PRCS, AND CORNER CUTBACKS PROJECTED PERPENDICULAR OR RADIAL FROM CENTERLINE." 0 INDICATES 8" SPIKE AND WASHER STAMPED L.S. 8639 OR LEAD TACK AND TAG L.S. 8639 OR 1" I.P. TAGGED L.S. 8639 TO BE SET AT ALL CENTERLINE POINTS OF CONTROL.
11 10 9
MONUMENT NOTES CONT'D:
8 7 6
N68°45'30"W 1973.40' (1973.43' CALC'D FROM RECORD R1)
(N69'32'00"W 1974.86' R7)
M8 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 3163", DOWN 0.4', IN LIEU OF 2''X2'' HUB TAGGED LS. 3163 PER R3.

ACCEPTED AS BOUNDARY CORNER.
5 M9 SEARCHED FOR NOT FOUND. ESTABLISHED BY COMPASS ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN MB AND M11 PER R3.

M10 SEARCHED FOR NOT FOUND. ESTABLISHED BY COMPASS ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN MB AND M11 PER R3.

M11 FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 3983", FLUSH, ACCEPTED AS 3/4" NO TAG PER R3. 4 3 2
RECORD DATA NOTES:
[ ] INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED DATA AS NOTED
( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA AS NOTED.

CALC INDICATES CALCULATED FROM RECORD.

RECORD OF SURVEY R.S.B. 107 /64.

PARCEL MAP NO. 12969, P.M.B. 83/71.
1 32
SHEET 3 OF 6 SHEETS
M14
0°10'42"
e INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED. M12 SEARCHED FOUND NOTHING, ESTABLISHED AT RECORD DISTANCE FROM M13 PER R3.

R1
R2
R3
R4
TRACT NO. 3340, M.B. 55/18-21. 0 C> ~:: 0)
s~ROAD
7 6 ~ - -----------=:::
■ INDICATES NOTHING TO BE SET.

M1 FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE WITH ILLEGIBLE TAG, NO REFERENCE, DOWN 0.4', ACCEPTED AS THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 OF RS AND THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RIVERVIEW DR PER R9.

M2 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 5529" PER R1, FLUSH, ACCEPTED AS ANGLE POINT IN SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF R7.

M3 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 3983" PER R1, DOWN 0.2' M4 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 5529" PER R1, DOWN 0.2', ACCEPTED AS ANGLE POINT IN SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF R7.

MS FOUND 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "RCE 862" PER R1 AND R2, DOWN 0.3'.

M6 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE, NO REFERENCE, DOWN 0.4', ACCEPTED AS BOUNDARY CORNER AS DESCRIBED IN R4, SET TAG L.S. 8639.

M7 FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 3963", DOWN 0.4', NO REFERENCE, S44°50'37"W 1.35' FROM ESTABLISHED BOUNDARY CORNER.

M13 FOUND NAIL & WASHER STAMPED "RIV CO TRANS' PER R3, FLUSH.

M14 FOUND NAIL & WASHER STAMPED "RIV CO TRANS' PER R3, FLUSH.

M15 FOUND NAIL & WASHER STAMPED "RIV CO TRANS' PER R3, FLUSH.

M16 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE, NO TAG, DOWN 0.5', NO REFERENCE. ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION WITH RIO ROAD.

M17 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE, NO TAG, DOWN 0.5', PER R6.

M18 SEARCHED FOUND NOTHING, ESTABLISHED BY THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF RIVERVIEW DRIVE AND A LINE BETWEEN M11 AND M13 PER R3. ~~~~~ INDICATES ACCESS RIGHTS RESTRICTED.

R5
R6
R7
DEED RECORDED MAY 13, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 2005-0380664.

U)Q'-L.f.l)~
0) a~ U) II
rf" 0 ~ 0) ._J
Lt)~...:.f"- I -/li11!'?!Lt)8
AMENDED MAP CF Rl\1£R\1EW TRACT, M.B. 4 / 58 '-0::'. .!!, -/li oi0 CORNER RECORD 03-351 J
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT #4091 RECORDED JULY 5, 1999 AS INST 1999-304302. \ M17 RB RECORD OF SURVEY R.S.B. 140/156.

R9 RECORD OF SURVEY R.S.B. 5/20
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, CC&R NOTE AND EASEMENT NOTES. 0 20 40 80

IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 38171
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF AMENDED MAP OF THE RIVERVIEW TRACT, IN THE

SEE SHEET 2 SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS
I I
I
SCALE: 1'' = 40' HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. DATE OF SURVEY: JANUARY, 2022 j (N70°59'20"W 1412.73' R7) ------ M18 /
1-IO ==----~~~---~~---:-::~-c:~-=-=-=-=~~-=-.;N~
7 ;
0 •
1 ;o·;o3~"wr1~41;1.8;2;· (~14;12.i29~• ~R4~) 1~14~.5~3' ~--=--==-=,r=:-:-=-=-=~~-=-=-=-==1~-=1-=--=--= 1 ~
35 :·
91 ~' :"""':"""':"""':-::"""'~~
1t -T ,, l
114.53' ---- .. ,.. .. -- 113.03' --- ... _ ,.. .. --
W - 116.54' ----- ----- - - - - - - -w 118.54' ----- ---- - - - - - - - -1- - I I I :::c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N70'10'03"W1398.31 - in ' Cl) ---- '
w w
CJ)
lO
1-w w
:::c
CJ)
w w
CJ)
;~:: f.:)
<O ....
tri
~
w
'i::,
r<)
-....
0 ;:::; z
00 N
---
-·~ "'--r
in
co
LO
lO
~ ____ cp ___ _
J:

CJ)
w w
CJ)
in
27 20,137 S.F.
118.50'
~
3 co
w 20,114 S.F. 'o
r<)
-:.,.
0 N z
111.00'
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, CC&R NOTE AND
EASEMENT NOTES.

SEE SHEET 3 FOR INDEX MAP, MONUMENT NOTES, RECORD
DATA NOTES, AND BOUNDARY ESTABLISHMENT MAP.
co
r<)
,:::
w
'i::,
r<)
;,.
0 ;:::; z
~
co
w
'i::,
r<)
;,.
0 N z
;,.

N
..,:
28 ,.._
w
20,133 S.F. 'i::,
r<)
;,.
0 ;:::; z
116.50'
N68°45•3o•w 631.34'

SADDLEHORN LANE
PUBLIC SlREET DEDICATED HEREON
N68°45'30"W 1196.97' ---
LOT A
2 ~
co
20,114 S.F. w
'i::,
r<)
-:.,.
0 N z
<O
0 ,-.:
29 ,.._
w
'i::, 20,111 S.F. r<)
-:.,.
0 ;:::; z
114.50'
1 20,114 S.F.
111.00' ____ 111.00' _ C? __
N68°45'30"W 1973.40' (1973.43' CALC'D FROM RECORD R1)
(N69°32'oo·w 1974.86' R7) in
~
co
w
'o
r<)
-..,.
0 N z
00 N
30 20,166 S.F.

96.92'
co
LO
32 "' N
ci co
0 ;:::; z
27,900 S.F.

OPEN SPACE
INFIL lRA 110N BASIN
139.03'
31 21,815 S.F.

I ·t I I ::J I
I fl? I
I _j
SEE SHEET 2
20' Rlll£R\I/EW
RECORDED DRIVE: PfR B
20' COUNrr 12/07/1959 00K 2594, PAGE:

R""""~ ROAD r,.,.,.., J59 o ,, c.,ur(DED ' "If BOOJ< '"• 12/17/1915 435, PAGE:

SOU1HEAS1ERL Y LINE OF LOT 2 OF AMENDED
MAP OF THE RIVERVIEW TRACT, M.B. 4/58
20' RIVE:R
RECOR~it DRIVE: PfR B
12/07/1959 00K 2594, PAGE
20' COUNrr R 359 o R
RECORIJE:D DAD PER BOOJ< • •
12/17/1915 435, PAGE
294 OF DfEDs
294 OF DE£Ds
0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
N32°17'56"E

21.35'
, , 26
, ,
<:::· I ; ~!t---~--
-~:~-..:'--31.16 --- ----- __
N25°10'03
7 ·w-::~-------=- - +--
.41' I
I
®7
i-5'
I
I
~::: {)
,n
I
v .,; v
I w
b
I "' .,,._
I • N
I
z
I WI . I
1-.. NI
_L.Olo I N-
CXJ:< "'v~
Dice: I LC) .

D 0 D (0 N, o_
N'
J!i_!I, z:

I ~ • ' ' /\\
',t,, ' '
--
' - R=1072.00 L=290.41' ------·---
ll=15°31'19"
- -
(0
1-w w
:I:

Cl)
ll=15°31'19"
- R=1100.00' L=298.00'---. 0 ,_.-_--__
w w
Cl)
(0
1-w w
:I:

Cl)
w w
Cl)
ll=15°31'19•
- R=1128 00' L 305 59' -
. .
- - - - - - -
--- ----
c:;
1xi
1-'-'
0 "' .,,._
D
N z
- - ~- -
133.04'
- - --
21 20,112 S.F.
116.05'
111.00·
10 20,114 S.F.
111.00'
- - - - - -
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, CC&R NOTE AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
cp_
I ,n
SEE SHEET 3 FOR INDEX MAP, MONUMENT NOTES, RECORD
DATA NOTES, AND BOUNDARY ESTABLISHMENT MAP.
---..
-(0
CD
N
LC)
-w
b
"' .,,._
D
N z

IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 38171
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF AMENDED MAP OF THE RIVERVIEW TRACT, IN THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 58 OF MAPS RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ALSO BEING PARCEL 2 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 4091, AS EVIDENCED BY NOTICE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED JULY 8, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1999-304302 OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH RANGE 5 WEST, S.B.M. ----- 130.04'
22 20,079 S.F.
130.00'
<O
HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. DATE OF SURVEY: JANUARY, 2022 F
----
- -----
-
r ,n
,n
0 oci
LC)
w
b
"' .,,._
D
N z
N6s0 4s•3o•w 440.47'
N70•10'03"W 1411.82' (1412.29' R4)
129.54' 127.54' -------- --
(N70°59'20"W 1412.73' R7)
-
N70°10'03"W 1398.37'
"o,
23 .,;
LC)
20,097 S.F. w
b
"' .,,._
D
N z
127.50'

SADDLEHORN LANE
PUBLIC SlREET DEDICATED HEREON
N68°4s'3o"w 1196.97'
24 20,132 S.F.

N17°29'52"W

RAD PRC ',,,

66.92' ' .~,·.
___ ..... ·1
----- .... ---
+
I
I
®7
-5•
I ;-..

I "' ci v
I Cl
<
I
Cl:'.
w
b
I "' .,,._
I
0 1'i
I
z
I
I
. I
• i.~i't I &.Je•4 .

Di"'.'>\._.,.~, L"'JJ 4f2•
'-"' L=67.61' -Bl
' R=S0.00'
ti= n°28'44•
127.04'
25 20,132 S.F.

N59°ss·s2·E
,r RAD PRC
L"' '

64.42'
I.,._ __ _
--- ---
IO
N68°45'30"W 440 47'
111.00· 111.00·
c:; c:;
9 8 1xi 1xi
1-'-' 20,114 S.F. ,w 20,114 S.F.

D 0
"' "' .,,._ .,,._
0 D
N N z z
111.00' 111.00'
- ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LOT A

2.344 AC.
--- ~3. •
101.93' -,, I • ,~ J.8f'
ll=10°27'19".,c::---;? \
L=9.13' ,:f \ ,----
' ' , ,,
' ':,,-w: o<D
. ' • (0
o,, ,-.. .
,t-1 0~ • ic,
~: < IXl II
"'-' D I Cl:'.
.!!i _,
t') I
z:
c:; 00
7 "' 1xi ci
IX)
1-'-' 20,112 S.F. w
D b
"' "' .,,._ .,,._
D D
N N z z
~
-s·
I
I
I
111.00' I
- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -
I
N68°45'30"W 1973.40' (1973.43' CALC'D FROM RECORD R1)
(N69'32'oo·w 1974.86' R7)
~
ti::

N59°58'52"E ;!:
,r RAD PRC ,
ti= n°2s· 44"
R=50.00'
L=67.61'
6 20,190 S.F.
119.00'
- - - - -
'
- -
~ 3~\ ----
-~:) . ,,,
,:;--'
-' N
'
O>
' ' N ' ;;::: . ' N:u Y1,o::
~:a...
o IC,
~:<C
z:a:::
c:;
1xi
1-'-'
D
"' .,,._
0 N z
- - - - - - -
---.... .. ,--- 120.54
-~
r ,n
-□
LC)
u-:i
26 (0
w 20,121 S.F. 'o
"' -..,_
D
N z
120.50'
N68°45'3o"w 631.34'
N6B0 45'3o"w 631 34'
111.00·
c:;
5 1xi
20,114 S.F. 1-'-'
0 "' .,,._
D
N z
111.00'
- - - - - - -- - - - -
SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS
-- ......
-
"' v
oci
~
w
b
"' .,,._
D
N z
<O
IO
111.00·
4 20,114 S.F.
_cp
111.00'
- - - -
1 ,n
;::: --i:-
-
s;t'
1-w w
:I:

Cl)
w w
Cl)
s;t'
1-
w w
- :::c --- Cl)
c:;
1xi
1-'-'
D
"' .,,._
D
N z
- -r -
-
...
...
-
w w
Cl)
s;t'
1-w w
- :::c Cl)
w w
Cl)

IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 38171
SHEET 6 OF 6 SHEETS
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 2 OF AMENDED MAP OF THE RIVERVIEW TRACT, IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 58 OF MAPS RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ALSO BEING PARCEL 2 OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 4091, AS EVIDENCED BY NOTICE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED JULY 8, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1999-304302 OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH RANGE 5 WEST, S.B.M. 0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'

CURVE TABLE - THIS SHEET ONLY

CURVE DELTA RADIUS
C1 21°16'48" 88.00'
LENGTH

32.68'
f
~
G~ <,;·
~ I
tf~·
~/
C2 86°51'23" 48.00' 72.76'
C3 38°39'02" 48.00' 32.38'
C4 70°39'55" 48.00' 59.20'

LINE TABLE

LINE BEARING LENGTH
L1 N82°07'27"E RAD 110.28'
1r~

RADIAL TABLE
1 ~
RADIAL BEARING TYPE /4 ~
RAD01 N49'31'40"W RAD G
~~--~-~ ~~
I
I&
~
I
~,,.

I
I
I
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF

BEARINGS, CC&R NOTE AND
EASEMENT NOTES.

SEE SHEET 3 FOR INDEX MAP,

MONUMENT NOTES, RECORD DATA

NOTES, AND BOUNDARY
ESTABLISHMENT MAP. M2 ·---
121.71'
HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. DATE OF SURVEY: JANUARY, 2022 ®
15 57,879 S.F.
w
'b .,.,
-:.,.
0 "' z
5'
<O
0,
.,;
~
1-'"
0 .,., .....
0 "' z
17 21,144 S.F.
14 22,314 S.F.
®
.w
b .,.,
-:.,.
0 "' z
_ 287.0_[_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ 100.0()'_ __ _ (N69'35'oo"w 464.30' R7)
N6B'5B'OO"W 462.65' ( 462.61' R3)
____ 1 oo. oo· 100. oo· ----- _ 87. •
- -N68°5B'QQ"W 453.B □'- - - ---J----_-_-_-_-_-_ T-_-N14'09'13"W 8.93':-c~ N • •••
.LO
:;;:

N
N
w
'o .,., .....
0 N z
18 25,276 S.F.
13 21,185 S.F.
<O .... .,-;
<O
N
w
'b .,.,
-:.,.
0 "' z
...,
CX)
ci
0 N
w
'o .,.,
-:.,.
0 "' z
00 N
w
a
19 "' -:.,.
0 27,434 S.F. "' z
12 20,224 S.F.

LO N40°39'34"E 10.42' =-: ... ;,{
<O
0 <D
CX)
w
'b .,.,
-:.,.
0 N z
11 I I
I
20,102 S.F.
_,
' ' l_ (N40°03'00"E 24.63' R7)
/" N40'39'34"E [24.63' R3]
M10
®
~
00 w
'o
"' -:.,.
0 "' z
.... ....

LO
I-
® ~
100.00' 105.00' _ _ _ _ 110.00· ________ l ____ ~
N68'45'30"W 1973.40' (1973.43' CALC'D FROM RECORD R1)
(N69'32'oo·w 1974.86' R7)
-w w

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: D ECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.K
CO
NSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE C ITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the consultant services agreement with Scott Fazekas & Associate s, Inc. for Building Official Services in the Community Development Department.

BACKGROUND
T
he Building and Safety Division is responsible for overseeing permit issuance, plan checks, and inspections for all development and construction activities in the City of Jurupa Valley. The Building Official position plays a critical role that serves as a technical resource for staff and provides highly complex and responsible support to the Director of Community Development.

On July 15, 2024, the City entered into an agreement with Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. for consulting services to support the Building and Safety Division, with a not -to- exceed amount of $25,000 per fiscal year. Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. has proven to be a reliable partner in ensuring compliance with Federal, State and local construction codes. We propose an amendment to the existing consulting agreement to increase the contract amount by $75,000, bringing the total not to exceed amount to $100,000.

Funding for the prior contract was authorized during the regular City Council Meeting on June 27, 2024, as part of the approved Fiscal Year 2024- 25 Community Development budget.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS
S
cott Fazekas & Associate s, Inc., has valuable institutional knowledge and con sistently delivers high- quality service and expertise as outlined in the a greement. They have proven to be worthy of extending the agreement for the remainder of the fiscal year , to ensure that the City meets the State’s requirement to have a Building Official to enforce the state building codes.

INANCIAL IMPACT
I
f the Amendment No. 1 is approved, the not to exceed amount will be increased to $100,000 for the remainder of this fiscal year. The amount appropriated will be recovered through permit cost and fees. Funds needed for proposed Amendment No. 1 were included in the adopted FY 2024-25 Community Development budget for Professional Services.

LTERNATIVES

1. A
pprove as recommended the Agreement between the City and Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.

2. D
o not approve the Agreement between the City and Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.

3. P
rovide alternative direction to staff.
******************
******** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.L
A

PPROVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
AND TKE ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES FOR 2023-2024 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (CIP #23105)
RE

COMMENDATION

1. T
hat the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and TKE Engineering, Inc. for Construction Management and Inspection Services for a not-to-exceed amount of $164,307.00 for the Citywide Paving Rehabilitation Project (CIP #23105); and

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make appropriate budgetary adjustments as necessary.

BACKGROUND
Cit
y Council approved CIP Pr oject #23105 and the Jurupa Valley R oadway Deferred Maintenance and I nfrastructure Deficit Improvement Program as part of the American Rescue Plan Act expenditure plan (ARPA) which included a list of candidate streets for pavement maintenance. On July 6, 2023, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 through Fiscal Year 2027-2028 Capital Improvement Program for the City of Jurupa Valley which included the 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation ARPA Project (Project).

T
he Project scope consists of pavement rehabilitation, installing ADA compliant access ramps, and new striping. The Project is being delivered in two phases . The Attachment includes the list of streets being rehabilitated as part of this P hase 1 contract. Minor

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
modifications may be made to the list of streets to avoid any unforeseen conflicts and to optimize the use of available funds.

T
he City is currently in midst of an ambitious capital improvement project (CIP) delivery.

There are several projects in construction and additional in the pipeline for the current fiscal year. The City does not have in house staff to manage and inspect all these projects, therefore staff drafted a Request For Proposals (“RFP”) to select a qualified firm to provide the services.

AN
ALYSIS
On
November 7, 2024, staff published an RFP for Construction Management services for the 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation project on the City’s PlanetBids portal, a web- based procurement and bidding system. The solicitation closed on, November 27, 2024.

The City received eleven responsive proposals from the following (in alphabetical order):
• E
C & AM Associates, Inc., Diamond Bar, CA
• ERSC, Inc., Redlands, CA
• Fountainhead Consulting Corporation, Fontana, CA
• LAE Associates, Inc., Placentia, CA
• Ladayu Consulting Group, Palos Verdes Estates, CA
• Onward Engineering, Anaheim, CA
• Specs Engineering Group, Inc., Brea, CA
• TKE Engineering, Inc., Riverside, CA
• Transtech Engineers, Inc., Chino, CA
• Willdan Engineering, Inc., San Bernardino, CA
• Z&K Consultants Inc., Corona, CA
P
er Section 3.15.100 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, professional services are defined as services provided by any specially trained and experienced person or firm in areas such as accounting, engineering, finance, and planning. Agreements for professional services are awarded by the City Council on the basis of the demonstrated competence, qualifications, and on the fairness and reasonableness of the cost of services and shall not be awarded solely on the basis of cost.

C
ity staff reviewed the proposals and rated them based on the criteria outlined in the RFP.

Staff found TKE to be the firm that best fits the City’s needs for construction management services for this project. TKE proposal provided a good understanding of the scope of work and has demonstrated their competency by completing several similar projects for the City. TKE is also proposing a reasonable cost for these services.

INANCIAL IMPACT
The Agreement has a not -to-exceed amount of $164,307.00 with an additional 10 percent contingency bringing the total approval amount to $180,737.70, which is budgeted in the ARPA Fund. There will not be any impact to the City’s General Fund.

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUP A VALLEY AND Tiffi ENGINEERING, INC FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FORTHE SERVICES FOR 2023-2024 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (CIP #23105)
(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OTHER THAN PUBLIC WORKS)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of December 19, 2024, between the City of Jurupa Valley ("City") and TKE Engineering, Inc., Riverside, California ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term
This Agreement shall commence on December 19, 2024, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, but in no event later than December 19, 2026, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

4. Payment
A. The City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Quotation for Service, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand Three Hundred Seven Dollars ($164,307.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.

B. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its perfonnance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council.

C. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.

Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (3 0) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultants' fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

B. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.

6. Default Of Consultant
A. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to malce progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.

B. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have
the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. Special Federal Requirements.

The Consultant does hereby acknowledge that this project will be partially or fully funded with Highway Safety Improvement Program grant funding, as is legislated under Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C. 148) and regulated under Part 924 of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (23 CPR Part 924)
and is tlierefore subject to applicable Federal
procurement, labor, environmental, equal opportunity, and other regulations or requirements, including, but not limited to those set forth in 23 U.S.C. 633 Subpart A-Federal-Aid Construction -2-
Contracts (Other than Appalachian Contract), the Required Contract Provisions set forth in Form FHWA 1273 and 29 CFR 5.5, any California Department ofTransportation grant requirements as set forth in the Program Supplement No. 000000Z58 to Administering Agency- State Agreement for Federal Projects No. 08-5487S21 dated March 17, 2022, all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Consultant shall comply with the requirements in the above-referenced documents and/or assist City with compliance as applicable, and also incorporate all applicable provisions to the documents noted above into any subConsultant agreements

8. Prevailing Wages
A. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by and in accordance with the requirements of Labor Code Sections 1720 et. seq. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute by this Consultant from the Director of the Department oflndustrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-Consultant hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $50.00 for each calendar day, or po1tion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any sub-Consultant under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement.

B. Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771. l(a). Consultant and any subConsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the perfo1mance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perfonn public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Consultant and subConsultants will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html.

9. Ownership and Maintenance Of Documents
A. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly -3-
identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

B. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be perfonned pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.

10. Indemnification.

Consultant shall defend, hold hannless and indemnify the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials ( collectively "Indemnitees") with respect to any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys' fees and costs of defense ( collectively, "Claims" hereinafter), including but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys' fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant's duty to defend pursuant to this Section shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

11. Insurance Requirements.

Minimum Limits oflnsurance. Consultant shall maintain limits a) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c)
California; Employer's Liability:
or disease.

B. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials ("Additional Insured") shall be covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds. -5-
2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.
4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days' prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Consultant of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Consultant shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

C. Acceptability oflnsurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating ofno less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

B. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

14. Confidentiality; Release Of Information
A. All information gained by Consultant in perfonnance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

15. Assignment
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. City consents to the use of the sub-consultants described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub-consultants shall be borne by the Consultant and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant: TKE Engineering, Inc.,
2305 Chicago Ave,
Riverside, Ca 91761
Attention: Terry Renner, PE, LS,QSD
B. Licenses. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.

C. Governing Law; Venue
I) The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 2) Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be
entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

D. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any
financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub- Consultants on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is -8-
entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

F. Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties aclmowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

G. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
-9-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITYOFJURUPA VALLEY
_______ , Mayor
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

CONSULTANT
By: ______________ _
Name: ____________ _
Title: _____________ _
By: _______________ _
Name: ____________ _
Title: _____________ _
[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]
-10-

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall provide construction management\services for the 2023-2024 Citywide pavement rehab project for CIP No. 23105 \
-11-

EXHIBITB

PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
Consultant shall perform the required services for a total not-to-exceed amount of $164,307 for the total term of the Agreement. Consultant's cost proposal is attached. -12-
Task No. Trusk
Scope of Services
Task l - Preconstru.ction Meeting
Task 2 -Material Submittal Review
Task 3 - Records Management
Task 4 - Construction Meetings
Task 5 - Construction Management
Task 6 - Pay Requests
Task 7 - Construction Inspection 3· >
Task 8 -Materials Testing
Task 9 -Project Close-Out
Rates:

Construction Manager
Project Engineer
Clerical
Inspector
City of Jurupa Valley
2024-25 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Project (24-25-04)- Construction Management and Inspection Consulting Engineering Fee
Construction Manager Project Engineer Clerical Inspector Homs $ Homs $ Homs $ Homs $
4 $ 700 8 $ 1,240 $ 90 2 $ 280
2 $ 350 16 $ 2,480 2 $ 180 2 $ 280
$ 4 $ 620 12 $ 1,080 20 $ 2,800
24 $ 4,200 48 $ 7,440 4 $ 360 10 $ 1,400
48 $ 8,400 96 $ 14,880 12 $ 1,080 s
2 $ 350 16 $ 2,480 4 $ 360 8 $ 1,120
4 $ 700 12 $ 1,860 $ 360 $ 50,400
2 $ 350 8 s 1,240 s 8 $ 1,120
4 $ 700 12 $ 1,860 4 $ 360 16 $ 2,240
Subtotal: 90 $ 15,750 220 $ 34,100 39 $ 3,510 426 $ 59,640 Subconsultants Total
$ $
$ 2,310
$ 3,290
$ 4,500
$ 13,400
$ 24,360
s 4,310
$ 52,960
$ 49,680 $ 52,390
$ 5,160
$ 49,680 $ 162,680
Reimbursables (@1 %)1· ): $ 1,627
Construction Management Total: $ 164,307
Notes:
$ 175 /HR 1.) Reimbursables Include Cost for Prints, Copies, Mileage, Etc. $ 155 /HR 2.) Assumes Constmction Period of 60 Working Days $ 90 /HR 3.) Subconsultant Fees for Materials Testing
$ 140 /HR
TKE Engineering, Inc.

Page | 1
S

TAFF REPORT
D
ATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.M
A

WARD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO HARDY AND HARPER,
INC. FOR 2023-2024 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (CIP #23105)
RE

COMMENDATION
1) T
hat the City Council award a construction contract to Hardy and Harper Inc. in the amount of $2,757,000.00 for the Citywide paving rehabilitation project. 2) Approve a project contingency in the amount of $275,700 (10% of bid amount) for unforeseen conditions.
3) Allocate funds for the Project in the amount $1,720,936.58 from American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) , as outlined in the Table A in the financial impact section.
4) Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney. 5) Authorize the Finance Director to make any appropriate budgetary changes.

BACKGROUND
City Council approved CIP Project #23105 and the Roadway Deferred Maintenance and Infrastructure Deficit Improvement Program as part of Fiscal Year 202 3-2024 through Fiscal Year 2027-2028 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”). On July 6, 2023, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 through Fiscal Year 2027- 2028 Capital Improvement Program for the City of Jurupa Valley which included 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project).

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
The Project scope consists of pavement rehabilitation, installing ADA compliant access ramps, and new striping.

A
dditionally, staff has issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Construction Management and Inspection (CM/CI) services. Staff will be recommending the award to the successful consultant as a separate City Council action.

ANALYSIS
Formal bidding procedures were followed in accordance with the Public Contract Code. seven (7) bids were received on December 3, 2024, and bids were opened soon aft er 4:00 p.m. with the following results:

Bidder Total Amount

1. Hardy & Harper, Lake Forest, CA $ 2,757,000.00

2. All American Asphalt, Corona CA $ 2,789,199.00

3. Calmax Engineering, Bloomington CA $3,017,506.95

4. Copp Contracting, Buena Park CA $3,011,177.80

5. LC Paving, Escondido CA

6. Onyx Paving Anaheim CA

7. RJ Noble Orange CA
$3,412,940.75
$3,412,940.75
$3,271,146.40
A
ll bids were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Hardy and Harper , Inc. was deemed the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with a bid in the amount $2,757,000.00 including all bid alternates . Hardy and Harper, NC is a reputable construction company who has successfully completed public works projects in Riverside and San Bernardino County and references were found to be satisfactory.

If approved the project will start in January 2025 and the anticipated completion by June 2025.

The project was evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is categorically exempt. This finding is based on Section 15304 which covers the reconstruction or replacement of existing structures.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds are available in fiscal year 2023-2024 budget to pay for this project. This project has no impact to the City’s General Fund.

Page | 3
The total estimated construction and related project expenses are as follows:

Construction $2,757,000.00
Contingency (10%) $275,700.00
Inspection and Materials Testing $200,000.00
Total $3,232,700.00
It is
proposed to use funds from Measure A and ARPA re-appropriated as follows:

Project Fund Amount Comments
ADA Transition Plan 252.2526.71405 $4,690.00 Project Complete Philadelphia Street Rehab-Ontario
Agreement 252.2526.71431 $63,369.52 Project Complete
City Wide Traffic Signal Interconnect 252.2526.71398 $785,604.60 Project Under Budget 2023-2024 Pavement Rehab (ARPA)
23111 252.2526.71415 $867,272.46 Project Complete
Total re-appropriation from Completed ARPA Project:
$1,720,936.58
2023-2024 Pavement Rehab 23105 252.2526.71424 $1,720,936.58 New Project 210- Measure A:
2023-2024 Pavement Rehab 23105 210.2100.71424 $1,511,763.42 Total project Funds: $3,232,700.00
************************ SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE ************************* Submitted by
ria F aser
eputy Director of Public
Works/Assistant City Engineer
Reviewed by:

Susan Paragas
Finance Director
Reviewed by:

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Attachments:
1) Project list of streets
Reviewed by:

Reviewed by:

Assistant City Manager
Submitted by:

Rod B. Butler
City Manager
2) Agreement, Project CIP # 23105, 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project Page I 4
w.vw.jurupavalley.org
Street
Etiwanda Ave
Felspar St
Holmes Ave
Inland Ave
.... • J -
-...-,.0
---o
. l
www. j uru pavall ey. o rg

PROJECT LIST OF STREETS
From To
60 Fwy Bellgrave Ave
Limonite Ave 51th St
Ridgeview Ave
Dulles Dr N Venture Dr
Legend
- v=o
Page I
S
Page I 6
www.jurupavalley.org
www.jurupava11ey.org
N
A
t;
o
0 I--er::: LLI
LI.
t; LLI
er::: I:;
cc z
0,, 0
U) ........ ....

N
A
Page I 7
Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA

AGREEMENT
PROJECT NO. 23105
2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project
THIS Agreement, made and entered into the 19th day of December 2024, between the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City" and Hardy and Harper, Inc., hereinafter·called the "Contractor."
That the City and the Contractor for the consideration hereinafter named, agree as follows:

1. Scope of Services. Contractor shall perform the work and provide all labor, materials, equipment and services, except as otherwise provided in the Plans or Special Provisions, in a good and workmanlike manner for the project identified 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project in accordance with this Agreement. The complete Agreement includes all of the Documents as if set forth in full herein, to wit, including the Agreement, any and all Contract Change Orders issued after the execution of the Agreement, Addenda No(s). N/A issued prior to the opening of the Bids, the Special Provisions (which includes the
General Provisions and Technical Provisions), the Project Plans, the Standard Plans, the Standard Specification, reference Specifications, the Bidder's Proposal, the Notice Inviting Bids, the Non-Collusion Affidavit, the Faithful Performance Bond, the Labor and
Materials Payment Bond and insurance (the "Documents"), all of which are essential parts of the Agreement between City and Contractor and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. In the event of any conflict in the provisions thereof, the terms of said Documents as set forth above shall control,
each over the other, in the order provided.

2. Compensation. The City will pay
the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept the prices set forth in the Bid Schedule as full compensation for the work required under the bid items awarded by the City, to wit, the Base Bid ltem(s) in the sum total amount of Two Million Seven Hundred Fifty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($2,757,000.00), subject to additions or reductions of the quantities of the various bid items at the unit prices bid, for furnishing all materials and for doing all the work contemplated and embraced under the Documents.

3. Payments. City shall make payments within thirty (30) days after receipt of an undisputed and properly submitted payment request from Contractor. City shall return to Contractor any payment request determined not to be a proper payment request as soon as practicable, but not later than seven (7) days after receipt, and shall explain in writing the reasons why the payment request is not proper.

A payment shall be made as the City Council of the City prescribes upon estimates approved by the City Council. However, progress payments shall not be made in excess of ninety-five percent (95%) of the percentage of actual work completed plus a like percentage of the value of material delivered on the ground or stored subject to, or under the control of, the City, and unused.

The City
1 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA shall withhold not less than five percent (5%) of the Agreement price until final completion and acceptance of the Project. However, at any time after fifty percent ( 50%) of the work has been completed, if the City Council of the City finds that satisfactory progress is being made, it may, at its discretion, make any of the remaining progress payments in full for actual work completed.

4. Time. The Contractor hereby agrees to commence work pursuant to this Agreement within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date
of authorization specified in the Notice to Proceed. The Contractor agrees to diligently prosecute the work, including corrective items of work, day to day thereafter, to completion, within Seventy (70) Working Days after said date in the "Notice to Proceed with Construction," except as adjusted by subsequent Contract Change Order(s).

5. Liquidated Damages. The City and Contractor hereby agree that in case all construction called for under the Agreement is not completed within the time hereinabove specified, including City caused delays or
extensions, damages will be sustained by the City and that, ii is and will be impracticable or extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual amount of damages the City will sustain in the event of,
and by reason of, such delay.

It is, therefore, agreed that such damages
shall be presumed to be in the amount of $1,000.00 per
calendar day, and that the Contractor will pay
to the City, or City may retain from amounts otherwise
payable to Contractor, said amount for each calendar day by which the Contractor fails to complete the work, including corrective items of work, under this Agreement within the time hereinabove specified and as adjusted by Contract Change Order(s). The Contractor will not be assessed liquidated damages for delay(s) occasioned by the failure of the City or of the owner of a utility to provide for the removal or relocation of utility facilities.

6. Insurance. The Contractor shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect: (1) a policy or policies of broad-form comprehensive general liability insurance with minimum limits of $2,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any injury, death, loss, or damage as a result of wrongful or
negligent acts by the Contractor, its officers,
representatives, volunteers, employees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement; (2) property damage insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00; (3) automotive liability insurance with a minimum combined single limits coverage of $1,000,000.00; and (4) workers' compensation insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 or the amount required by law, whichever is greater.

Acceptable insurance
coverage shall be from an admitted corporate surety insurer licensed in the State of California, approved by the City, and with a rating of, or equivalent to, A:VII by A.M. Best & Company. Any deviation from
this rule shall require specific approval, in writing, from the City.

All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non-renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through addition of additional insured to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving the City thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof by certified mail, return receipt requested. The Contractor agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify said insurance coverage.

The Contractor agrees
that if it does not keep the aforesaid insurance in full force and effect, and such insurance is available at a reasonable cost, the City may take out the necessary insurance and pay the premium thereon, and the repayment thereof shall be deemed an obligation of the Contractor and the cost of such insurance may be deducted, at the option of the City, from payments due the Contractor.
2 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA The Contractor shall submit to the City (1) insurance certificates indicating compliance with the minimum workers' compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements not less than one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement.

Any deductibles must be declared to and approved by the City.

The general liability and automobile liability policies must contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: "The City of Jurupa Valley, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as insureds with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the contractor; and with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with the work or operations." The insurance provided by Contractor shall be primary to any coverage available to the City.

The Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required herein. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City may require, at any time, complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage.

7. Bonds. The Contractor hereby agrees to provide and maintain in effect two (2) good and sufficient Surety Bonds for one hundred percent (100%) each of the contract price. The bonds shall be a "Faithful Performance Bond" which shall guarantee the faithful performance of all work and a "Labor and Materials Payment Bond" which shall secure the payment of the claims of labor, mechanics, or materialmen for all work under the Agreement pursuant to Section 9550 of the Civil Code.

8. Contractor's Guarantee. The Contractor, the Contractor's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns guarantee that all work performed under this Agreement fully meets the requirements thereof as to quality of
workmanship and materials furnished. If any defects in materials or workmanship become evident within a period of one year from the date of the acceptance of the
work by the City Council, the Contractor shall, at his or her own expense, make any repair(s) or replacement(s) necessary to restore the work to full compliance with the Plans and Specifications.

9. Labor Standards and Prevailing Wages. The Contractor shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC a-276, a-5) and
the implementation regulations thereof. Contractor
shall comply with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Federal Labor Standards Provisions (HUD 4010), incorporated as Exhibit B-1 in Appendix E.

The Contractor acknowledges that
work under this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages pursuant to Section 1770 and 1773 et seq. of the Labor Code of the State of California, the
Director of Industrial Relations (State Prevailing Wages), and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Federal Labor Standards Provisions (Davis-Bacon Act Prevailing Wages). The Contractor to whom the contract is awarded, and all subcontractors under him, shall pay the higher of the Federal or State prevailing wage rate for any given classification employed in the performance of this contract.

The Federal wage
decision is the one in effect ten (10) days prior to bid opening; it is available on line at: https://www.wdol.gov/wdol/scafiles/davisbacon/ca.html. The State wage decision is available online at: https://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/DPreWageDetermination.htm. 3 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA

10. Third Party Claims. City shall have full authority to compromise or otherwise settle any claim relating to the Agreement at any time. City shall timely notify Contractor of the receipt of any third- party claim relating to the Agreement. City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs incurred in providing this notice.

11. Antitrust Claims. Contractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 ( commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the California Business and Professions Code) arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties.

12. Claim Dispute Resolution. In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of work, but shall proceed with the performance of the work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. The disputed work will be categorized as an "unresolved dispute" and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by mutual agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all disputed work, claims and other disputed matters
All claims arising out of or related to the Agreement or this Project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104 et seq. (Article 1.5), where applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as though fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must file a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to filing a construction claim in compliance with Section 9204 and Article 1.5 (if applicable), and must then adhere to Article 1.5 and Section 9204, as applicable, pursuant to the definition of "claim" as individually defined therein.

13. Debarred, Suspended or Ineligible Contractors. Contractor shall not be debarred throughout the duration of this Agreement. Contractor shall not perform work with debarred subcontractor pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or 1777. 7.

No contract shall be made to parties listed on the General Services Administration's List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs in accordance with Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, "Debarment and Suspension," as set forth at 24 CFR part 24. This list contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, and contractors declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Contractors with awards that exceed the small purchase threshold shall provide the required certification regarding its exclusion status and that of its principal employees.

14. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees not to accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement or within twelve (12) months after completion of the work under this 4 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA Agreement which is or may likely make Contractor "financially interested," as provided in Government Code Section 1090 and 87100, in any decisions made by City on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained pursuant to this Agreement.

Contractor shall comply with the Conflict of Interest provisions, as applicable, in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200.112 and 24 CFR Part 570.611 and other federal Conflict of Interest requirements.

15. Trenching and Excavations. If the project involves trenching more than four ( 4) feet deep, Contractor shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify the City in writing of any:
material that Contractor believes may be hazardous waste, as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 25117, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class 11, or Class Ill disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those
indicated; or unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Agreement. The City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if the City finds that
the conditions do materially differ or do involve hazardous waste and cause a decrease or increase in Contractor's cost of or the lime required for performance of any part of the work, the City
shall issue a change order.

16. Utilities. The City acknowledges its responsibilities under Government Code section 4215 and incorporates that section herein by this reference.

17. Location of Existing Elements. The methods used and costs involved to locate existing elements, points of connection and all construction methods are Contractor's sole responsibility. Accuracy of information furnished, as to existing conditions, is not guaranteed by the City. Contractor, at its sole expense, must
make all investigations necessary to determine locations of existing elements, which may include, without limitation, contacting U.S.A. Alert and other private underground localing firm(s), utilizing specialized locating equipment and/or hand trenching.

18. Wage and Hour Laws. The Contractor shall, as a penalty, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of the Agreement for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in
any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1813. As provided for in California Labor Code Section 1810, a legal day's work is 8 hours of labor in any one calendar day.

19. Audits and Records. The Contractor shall maintain and keep books and records on a current basis, recording all transactions pertaining to this Agreement in a form in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles. The City or its representative shall have the option of inspecting and/or auditing all records and other written materials used by Contractor in preparing its billings to the City as a condition precedent to any payment to Contractor. Contractor will promptly furnish documents requested by the City. Additionally, Contractor shall be subject to State Auditor examination and audit at the request of the City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of four
( 4) years after
final payment under this Agreement.

20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including any other documents incorporated herein by specific reference, represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Contractor. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be modified
or amended, nor any provision or breach waived, except in a writing signed by both parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. 5 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA

21. Termination. This Agreement may be canceled by the City at any time with or without cause without penalty upon thirty (30) days' written notice. In the event of termination without fault of Contractor, City shall pay Contractor for all services satisfactorily rendered prior to date of termination, and such payment shall be in full satisfaction of all services rendered hereunder.

22. Substitution of Securities.

Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, the Contractor will be permitted the substitution of securities for any monies withheld by the City of Jurupa Valley to
ensure performance under this Agreement. At the request and expense of the Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the City of Jurupa Valley, or with a state or federally chartered bank as the escrow agent, who
shall pay such monies to the Contractor. Securities
eligible for substitution under this section shall include those listed in Section 16430 of the Government Code,
bank or savings and loan certificates of deposit, interest-bearing demand deposit accounts, and standby letters of credit. The Contractor shall be the beneficial owner of any securities substituted for
monies withheld and shall receive any dividends or interest thereon. The Contractor shall give the City written notice within thirty (30)
days after this Agreement is awarded that it desires to substitute securities for money that would ordinarily be withheld. If the substituted securities are deposited into an escrow, the escrow shall be governed by a written escrow agreement in a form which is substantially similar to the agreement set forth in Section 22300, of the Public Contract Code.

23. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor hereby agrees, at its sole cost and
expense, to defend, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Jurupa Valley, and their officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, and assigns ( collectively "lndemnitees") from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees
of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith (collectively "Liabilities"}, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, incidental to, or
related to any act, failure to act, error, or omission of Contractor or
any of its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers or their officers, agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with, resulting from, or related to this Agreement or the performance or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement, including this indemnity provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by lndemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify lndemnitees against any such negligence. This indemnity
provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which lndemnitees 6 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an lndemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against an lndemnitee shall be conclusive in favor of the lndemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. Contractor shall pay lndemnitees for any attorney's fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to encompass (a) lndemnitees' sole negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code 2782(a) or (b) the contracting public agency's active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code 2782(b ). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under the Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to lndemnitees. The Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the lndemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the lndemnitees.

24. Assignment. The
parties do for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns agree to the full performance of all of the provisions herein contained. The Contractor may not, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign any obligation assumed by the Contractor hereunder without prior written consent of the City.

25. Attorney's Fees. If
any legal action or other proceeding, including action for declaratory relief, is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, experts' fees, and other costs, in addition to any other relief to which the party may be entitled.

26. Worker's Compensation Insurance. By my signature hereunder, as Contractor, I certify that I am aware of the Provisions of
Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the Provisions of that code, and I will comply with such Provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement.

27. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date of the Award of Contract by the City of Jurupa Valley.

28. Contractor's License. Contractors are required by law to be licensed and regulated by the Contractors' State
License Board. Any questions concerning a Contractor may be referred to the Registrar, Contractors' State License Board, 3132 Bradshaw Road, Sacramento, CA 95826. Mailing address: P.O. Box 26000, Sacramento, CA 95826 .
........... {SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)**********
7 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
Municipal Corporation
BY: _______________ _
Rod Butler, City Manager, City of Jurupa Valley
Date: _______________ _

INTERNAL USE ONLY
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:

Peter Thorson, City Attorney
Date
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Paul Toor, P.E., Director of Public Work/ City
Engineer
(if contract exceeds $5,000)
SIGNING INSTRUCTION TO THE CONTRACTOR:
( Name of Contractor)
License No./
Classification:, ____________ _
Expiration Date: ___________ _
Federal I.D. No.: ___________ _
PRINT NAME: __________ _
SIGNATURE: __________ _
TITLE: _____________ _
DATE:

Date
PRINT NAME: __________ _
SIGNATURE: ___________ _
TITLE: _____________ _
DATE: ______________ _
Date
All signatures on the Agreement on behalf of the Contractor must be acknowledged before a notary public.

General Partners must sign on behalf of the partnership.

NOTE: In the event that the contracting firm is a corporation, two (2) corporate officers having authority from the corporation MUST sign (two (2) signatures total). If the corporation has a corporate resolution stating that one person is authorized to sign on behalf of all officers, attach corporate resolution immediately following the notary certificates.Corporate Seal may be affixed hereto.
8 Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA BOND NO.

PREMIUM$

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
(100% of Total Contract Amount)
PROJECT NO. 23105
2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project
KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, known as "City," has awarded to Hardy and Harper Inc, as Principal hereinafter designated as "Contractor" and have entered into an Agreement whereby the Contractor agrees to construct or install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said Agreement, effective on the dale signed by the City Manager/Mayor, and identified as Project No. 23105 is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, said Contractor under the terms of said Agreement is required to furnish a bond guaranteeing the faithful performance of said Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, we the undersigned Contractor and- ---,- -,----,.,-,-----,-,----,- as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside in the penal sum of One Million Eight-Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Five-Hundred Ninety Dollars ($1,865,590.00), lawful money of the United States, to be paid to the said City or its certain attorney, its successors and assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the above bound Contractor, his or her or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in said Agreement and any alterations thereof made as therein provided, on his or her or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Jurupa Valley, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. In the event suit is brought upon this bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney fee to be fixed by the court.

The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder, or the Provisions accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or the Provisions.
.. ..... ...,. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) .. ••••••••

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA BOND NO.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands, and seals on this ___ day of ______ 2024.

Contractor
Name:

CONTRACTOR
--------------
Address: -------------
Telephone No.:

Print Name: ------------
Signature: ___________ _
Approved as to Form this
___ dayof _________ 2024
Peter Thorson
City AttorneY1
City of Jurupa Vaffei
SURETY
Name: ______________ _
Address: --------------
Telephone No.:

Print Name: ____________ _
Attorney-in-Fact
Signature: _____________ _
NOTE: This bond must be executed by both parties. Corporate seal may be affixed hereto. All signatures must be acknowledged before a notary public (attach acknowledgments). The attorney-in- tact for the corporate surety must be registered, as such, in at least one county in the State of California. (Attach one original Power of Attorney sheet for each bond).

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA

LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND
(100% of Total Contract Amount)
Project No. 23105
2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project

KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS
BOND NO.

PREMIUM$
THAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, known as "City", has awarded to Hardy and Harper Inc, as Principal hereinafter designated as "Contractor" and have entered into an Agreement whereby the Contractor agrees to construct or install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said Agreement, effective on the date signed by the City Manager/Mayor, and identified as Project No. 23105, is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, said Contractor under the terms of said Agreement is required to furnish a bond to secure the payment of claims of laborers, mechanics, materialmen, and other persons, as provided by law; NOW, THEREFORE, we the undersigned Contractor and _______________ _, as Surety are held and firmly bound unto the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside, in the penal sum of One Million Eight-Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Five-Hundred Ninety Dollars ($1,865,590.00), lawful money of the United States, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Contractor, his or her or its heirs, executors, administrator, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall fail to pay any of the persons described in the State of California Civil Code, Section 9100, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant, or any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Franchise Tax Board from the wages of employees of the Contractor and his or her subcontractors, pursuant to Section 13020, of the Unemployment Insurance Code, with respect to such work and labor, that the Surety or Sureties herein will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In the event suit is brought upon this bond by the City or other person entitled to bring such an action and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all costs incurred by the City in such suit, including a reasonable attorney fee to be fixed by the court.

LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND
Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA This bond shall inure to the benefit of any of the persons described in the State of California Civil Code Section 9100, to give a right of action to such persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. ***""***** (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)** ••••••••

LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND
Project No. 23105 2023-2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Jurupa Valley, CA BOND NO.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands, and seals on this ___ day of 2024. ------
BIDDER
Contractor
Name: _____________ _
Address: -------------
Telephone No.: __________ _
Print Name: ___________ _
Signature: ____________ _
Approved as to Form this
___ dayof _________ 2024
Peter lihorson
City Attorney
City of J1uirupa Valley
SURETY
Name: ______________ _
Address: _____________ _
Telephone No.: ___________ _
Print Name: ____________ _
Attorney-in-Fact
Signature: _____________ _
NOTE: This bond must be executed by both parties. Corporate seal may be affixed hereto. All signatures must be acknowledged before a notary public (attach acknowledgments). The attorney-in- fact for the corporate surety must be registered, as such, in at least one county in the State of California. (Attach one original Power of Attorney sheet for each bond).

LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND
P
age | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
24282: A SECOND ONE -YEAR EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP ( TPM37256EOT2) NO. 37256 AND A ONE -YEAR

EXTENSION FOR THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
(SDP16043EOT2), EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE FROM
OCTOBER 29, 2024 TO OCTOBER 29, 2025 AND DETERMINING

THAT NO ADDITIONAL CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 ; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER
OF MISSION BOULEVARD AND CRESTMORE ROAD (APNS: 179 -
330-002, 003, 004, 005 & 006); (APPLICANT: NORTHTOWN

HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION)

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and adopt Resolution No. 2024-131, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY APPROVING A SECOND ONE- YEAR EXTENSION FOR
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM37256EOT2) NO. 37256 AND A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION FOR THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP16043EOT2), EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE TO OCTOBER 29, 2025 ; AND

DETERMINING THAT NO ADDITIONAL CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED
UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Applicant, Northtown Housing Development Corp or
ation, requested a one- year
extension of the expiration date from October 29, 2024 to October 29, 2025. The Applicant requires extra time to finalize and record the final map and an extension for the site

RETURN TO AGENDA
P
age | 2
development permit. The project consists of a 28,015 square- foot commercial building and 57 affordable multi -family units on a 7.1 3 gross acre site located at the northeast corner of Crestmore Road and Mission Boulevard. See Exhibit No. 1 for the Site Location Map and Exhibit No. 2 for Tentative Parcel Map.

Northtown Housing Development Corporation is a 501 (C) 3 non-profit affordable housing developer and service provider. They provide a variety of services to low -income residents that range from affordable housing to homeownership programs.

EXHIBIT NO. 1: SITE LOCATION MAP
E
XHIBIT NO. 2 - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP

P
age | 3

LOCATION
The Rubidoux Gateway Villas project encompasses five (5) parcels at the northeastern corner of Mission Boulevard and Crestmore Road, situated within the Rubidoux Town Center Overlay. The Santa Ana River borders the site to the south residential neighborhoods to the north and west, and the Jurupa Valley Operational Center (JVOC) to the west. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District owns the land between Mission Boulevard and the project site that is used for access to the Santa Ana River.

BACKGROUND
The extension of time , if granted, w ould provide a second one- year extension to the Tentative Parcel Map, additionally the approval would provide a second one- year extension for the Site Development Permit associated with the Rubidoux Gateway Villas project. The Tentative Parcel Map is the primary entitlement required for subdividing the property per municipal code requirements. The site development approves the detailed aspects of the proposed project including building placement, landscaping, parking, and design aesthetics.

The Rubidoux Gateway Villas was initially approved on October 29, 2020, when the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020- 54 and Ordinance 2020-10 under MA16224. This approval included several entitlements: Site Development Permit No. 16043, General Plan Amendment No. 16006, Change of Zone No. 16001, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 37256. Additionally, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), adopted a Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and issued a Statement of Overriding Considerations.

Table No. 1 below demonstrates the entitlements initially approved as part of the development and notes applicable expiration dates.

P
age | 4
TABLE 1 - PREVIOUS APPROVAL(s)

ENTITLEMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPIRATION DATE
MA16224
Action Date:

October 29,
2020
GPA16006 – Commercial Retail (CR) and Medium Density
Residential (MHDR) to Commercial Retail (CR) for a 1.81-acre commercial parcel and High-Density Residential (HDR) for a

5.20-acre parcel.

No Expiration Date.

CZ16011 – Rezone 1.81-acre parcel from Rubidoux-Village Commercial (R-VC), Multiple-Family Dwellings (R-2), and Light Agriculture (A-1) to Rubidoux-Village Commercial (R-VC) and General Residential (R-3).

No Expiration Date.

SDP16043 – For the construction of the (a) commercial
development on a 1.81-acre parcel and (b) 57-unit multi- family affordable housing development with a community
center, pool, and maintenance building, and covered and uncovered ground-level parking on a 5.20-acre. Parcel. The Project includes landscaping, internal paving, and walkways.

MA22298 (SDP16043EOT1) extended this entitlement to
10/29/2024)
October 29, 2024
TPM37256 – A Schedule “E” subdivision of approximately 7.13 gross acres into two parcels totaling 1.81 and 5.20 acres each.

MA23244 (TPM37256EOT1) extended this entitlement to
10/29/2024)
October 29, 2024
Table 2 provides information on general plan land use, zoning, and existing land use for the property.

RUBI

DOUX GATEWAY VILLAS PROJECT SUMMARY
The Rubidoux Gateway project, situated on 7. 13 gross acres of land, is a mixed- use development project. It is comprised of a 28,015 square- foot commercial building on a

1.81-acre parcel and fifty-seven (57) multi-family affordable housing units on a 5.20-acre parcel. The project's design integrates a community center, a pool facility, ground- level parking, and lush landscaped areas. The parcel map delineates the subdivision into two parcels. Parcel 1, consisting of 1.81 acres, is slated to accommodate the commercial TABLE 2: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Area 7.13 gross acre
General Plan Land Use Designation Commercial Retail (CR) High Density Residential (HDR)
Zoning Rubidoux-Village Commercial (R-VC) and
General Residential (R-3).

Existing Land Use Vacant
P
age | 5
component of the project. Parcel 2, consisting of 5.20 acres , is designated for the residential segment of the project.

Additionally, the parcel map allocates 0.13 acres for street dedication, and it includes technical notes about reciprocal easements, which are essential for facilitating access, managing drainage systems, providing adequate parking solutions, and ensuring the provision of necessary utilities.

The commercial building has a floor ar ea ratio (FAR) of 0.35 and includes 78 on-site parking spaces, complemented by 47 off-site street parking locations.

The residential component includes 12 detached buildings with 57 residential dwelling units, resulting in a density of 10.9 dwelling units per acre. The project includes 155 on- site parking spaces. The project includes ancillary structures for residential use, such as a community center building, a pool building, a maintenance facility, and covered parking spaces. Additionally, the development includes aesthetic and functional aspects of the site, incorporating comprehensive landscaping, internal paving, and walkways to enhance the overall ambiance and accessibility. All of the units will be affordable except the Manager’s Unit. The affordable housing units count toward Regional Housing Needs (RHNA) housing allocations , and they are noted in the City ’s Housing Element. The Riverside County Average Median Income (AMI) is used to calculate affordability, and the affordability is provided as shown in Table No. 2.

Table No.2: Unit Affordability Table
Type of Unit Number of Units AMI
2 Bedroom 10 30%
2 Bedroom 7 60%
3 Bedroom 4 30%
3 Bedroom 6 40%
3 Bedroom 11 50%
3 Bedroom 12 60%
4 Bedroom 1 30%
4 Bedroom 3 50%
4 Bedroom 2 60%
2 Bedroom 1 Manager's Unit
TOTAL 57
P
age | 6
Exhibit No. 3 demonstrates the approved site plan.

EXHIBIT NO. 3: APPROVED SITE PLAN
T
ITLE 7 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP EXTENSIONS
Before the Tentative Parcel Map’ s expiration on October 29, 2024, the applicant requested a second one- year extension. Per Section 7.15.230 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, tentative parcel maps may be extended annually for up to six years, with this being the second of six possible extensions. The map’s total life cannot exceed nine years, ending on October 29, 2029.

Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code (Subdivisions) includes provisions governing the duration and extension of permits for tentative parcel maps. In particular, Section

7.15.230 specifies that tentative parcel maps are provided with an initial approval period lasting 36 months from the date of their approval. This timeframe is provided to fulfill the various requirements of the tentative parcel map such as securing final map approval through the Engineering Department and the completion of the recordation process of the final map with the County Recorder.

An Extension of Time may be granted if the land division continues to comply with the General Plan, maintains consistency with zoning regulations, and does not compromise the general health, safety, or welfare of the public. The TPM still complies with the applicable requirements. The applicant only propose to extend the approval period and

P
age | 7
did not propose any changes to the subdivision nor development plan. Furthermore, the project does not conflict with any requirements the city has adopted since its initial approval. Therefore, the project continues to satisfy the necessary criteria for approval.

Status of Final Map
Engineering has received the final map application and prov ided comments to the applicant. The Applicant is currently working on finalizing corrections on the final map application and is expected to complete the final map process by next year. Upon the recordation of the final map, and with the approval of the required grading and building permits, the applicant can start construction sometime in 2025.

TITLE 9 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXTENSIONS
The Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires that a Site Development Permit be used within two years of its effective date, or within an additional period as outlined in the Conditions of Approval, with a maximum of five years. An extension of time may be granted if a valid reason is provided for not using the permit within the required time. Since the City Council was the original approval body for this project, they have the authority to approve an extension.

The initial expiration date was set for October 29, 2022. MA22298 granted a two- year extension to 2024 (Resolution No. 2023- 15). Before the extended date of October 29, 2024, the applicant submitted a request for a one- year extension. If approved, the expiration date would extend to 2025. If the permit is not used by this new deadline, it will become null and void.

ARPA FUNDING AND PROJECT
In August 2022, the City Council approved a $28 million ARPA Expenditure Plan to combat the impacts of the pandemic, including $1.2 million allocated for housing crisis mitigation. The City allocated $990,000 to facilitate affordable housing projects and issued a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) in April 2024. The NOFA prioritized shovel -ready projects with secured funding, long-term affordability, and proximity to transit and services.

On June 27, 2024, the City Council selected Rubidoux Gateway Villas for the $990,000 award in ARPA funds. It was based on several key factors. The development would provide 56 affordable housing units, targeting large families with incomes between 30-60% of the County Area Median Income. The project is financially feasible, with commitments for funding from multiple sources, including Low Income Housing Tax Credits and Housing Choice Vouchers. Additionally, Northtown’s extensive experience in managing over 400 rental units, along with the project’s alignment with the City’s Housing Element, made it the recommended choice for the $990,000 award.

On November 7, 2024, the City Council reviewed and approved a loan agreement for public improvements associated with the project. The construction timeline specifies that work on the project is scheduled to commence on December 21, 2026, with full project completion anticipated by June 1, 2027.

P
age | 8

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is “within the scope” of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). According to PRC §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162, no further environmental review is required. On October 29, 2020, the City Council adopted the EIR, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as part of the project’s approval.

The City has determined that, based on the Previous Environmental Document (PED) prepared for the project, all potentially significant effects have been mitigated or avoided in compliance with the Final EIR (State Clearinghouse #2018061047, City of Jurupa Valley Master Application No.16224). The requested extension only affects the approval period, with no other changes proposed. Therefore, the project remains “within the scope” of the certified EIR, and no additional environmental review is required under CEQA.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The applicant submitted the Extension of Time application with the accompanying fixed fee.

ALTERNATIVES

1. R
ecommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-131 to approve a second one- year extension for Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 37256OT2) No. 37256 and a one- year extension for the Site Development Permit (SDP16043EOT2), extending the expiration date to October 29, 2025. It will also be determined that no additional CEQA review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.

2. D
eny MA24282 (TPM37256EOT2, SDP16043EOT2 ); (No action, maintain the expiration date of 10/29/2024).

3. Continue the public hearing to a later date and provide direction to staff.

CONCLUSION
The proposed one-year extension of time applications are in conformance with the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed land use. The design of the project will not cause substantial environmental damage, harm any wildlife, nor cause serious public health problems, as demonstrated in the certified Environmental Impact Report and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program adopted for this project and as further analyzed by the City’s CEQA Administrator.

ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Resolution No. 2024-131
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-131

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND ONE-YEAR
EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM37256EOT2) NO.
37256 AND A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION FOR THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP16043EOT2), EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE TO OCTOBER. 29, 2025; AND DETERMINING THAT NO ADDITIONAL

CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15162

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. Northtown Housing Development (the "Applicant") has applied for a second one-year Extension of Time (EOT) for Site Development Permit No. 16043 (SDP16043EOT2) and a second one-year EOT for Tentative Parcel Map No. 37256 (TPM37256EOT2) to extend the approval term to October 29, 2025. The Site Development Permit and Tentative Parcel Map are entitlements related to Master Application No. 16224 (MA16224).

On October 29, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-54, approving MAI 6224 to permit a mixed-use project consisting of a 28,015 square foot commercial building on a 1.81-acre parcel and fifty-seven (57) multi-family affordable housing dwelling units on a 5.20-acre parcel (the "Project"). The project is located on the northeast corner of Mission Boulevard and Crestmore Road (APNs: 179-330-002, -003, -004, -005, and -006).

Section 2. Extension of Time - Site Development Permit
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval for a one-year extension of time for a Site Development Permit No. 16043.
(b) The City Council originally approved Site Development Permit No. 16043 on October 29, 2020, with an expiration date of October 29, 2022. (c) The City Council approved MA22298, which approved a two-year extension for Site Development Permit No. 16043 extending the permit to October 29, 2024. (d) The Applicant filed an application for a one-year extension for the Site Development Permit on October 16, 2024, ahead of October 29, 2025, expiration date. (e) Section 9.240.330.7.A of Chapter 9.240 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that any site development permit that is approved shall be used within two (2) years from the effective date thereof or within such additional time as may be specified in the conditions of approval, which shall not exceed a total of five (5) years. If a site development permit is required to be used within less than five (5) years, the applicant or his/her successor-in-interest may, prior to its expiration, request an extension of time in which to use the site development permit. A request for an extension of time shall be made on forms provided by the Community Department and shall be filed with the Community Development Director, accompanied by the fee set forth in -1-
Ordinance No. 671 as the fee for extension of the time within which to use a permit. The hearing body or officer that originally approved the site development permit shall consider it. An extension of time may be granted upon a determination that a valid reason exists for the applicant not using the site development permit within the required period. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for the use of the site development permit shall not exceed a period of five ( 5) years, calculated from the effective date of the issuance of the site development permit. (f) Approval of the one-year extension of time request will extend the expiration date of Site Development Permit No. 16224 to October 29, 2025, which does not exceed the total of five (5) years from the effective date.
(g) Section 9.240.330.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that no site development permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:
(!) The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley.
(2) The overall development of the land shall be designed to protect public health, safety and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall talce into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof.
(3) All site development plans which permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel shall, in addition to all other requirements, be subject to a condition which prohibits the sale of any existing or subsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Riverside Cotmty Ordinance No. 460, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chap ter

1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.
(h) Section 9.240.330.(4)(d)(i) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that a site development permit application that requires the approval of a general plan amendment, a specific plan amendment, or a change of zone shall be heard in accordance with the provisions of Section 9,285.040, and all of the procedural requirements and rights of appeal as set forth therein shall govern the hearing.
(i) Section 9.05.110 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that notwithstanding any other provisions of this title, in the event that a project requires a general plan amendment, zone change, specific plan amendment, development agreement or other legislative action in addition to the tentative subdivision map, site development permit, conditional use permit, variance or other quasi-judicial land use applications for the project, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council to approve, modify or deny the applications for the legislative action for the project and a recommendation to the City Council to -2-
approve, conditionally approve or deny the quasi-judicial land use applications. The Council shall hear the applications for the legislative actions along with the applicable procedures of Section

9.05.100. The decision of the City Council shall be made by ordinance or resolution as required by law and shall require three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council. The purpose of this section is to enable the City Council to hear and decide all of the land use entitlements for a project in a comprehensive and coordinated manner.

Section 3. Extension of Time - Tentative Parcel Map
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval for a second one-year extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map No 37256.
(b) The City Council approved MA23244, which approved a one-year extension for Tentative Parcel Map No. 37256 extending the permit to October 29, 2024. ( c) The Applicant filed an application for a one-year extension for the Tentative Parcel Map No. 37256 on October 29, 2024, ahead of October 29, 2025, expiration date. (d) Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurnpa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designated as the "Advisory Agency" charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed Schedule "E" maps. Further, Sections 7.05.020.A. and 7.15.150 of the Jurnpa Valley Municipal Code provide that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
(e) Section 7.15.230.A. of Chapter 7.15 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and Govermnent Code Section 66452.6(e) provide that the Planning Commission may extend an approved or conditionally approved tentative map for a period or periods not exceedi_ng a total of six ( 6) years upon application of the subdivider filed prior to the expiration of the tentative map. Further, Govermnent Code Section 66452.6(e) provides that prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, and upon an application by the subdivider to extend that map, the tentative map shall be automatically extended for sixty (60) days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs first.
(t) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurnpa Valley Municipal Code requires denial of a tentative parcel map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurnpa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
(g) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
(h) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
(i) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
-3-
G) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
(k) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
(I) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems.
(m) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. (n) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental imp act report. (o) Section 7.15.140 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the action of the Planning Commission on a tentative Schedule "E" map will be final, unless the final decision is appealed by the land divider or any interested party. (p) Sections 7.05.030.B. and 7.15.150 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provide that if a land divider or any interested party believes that they may be adversely affected by the decision of the Planning Commission, the land divider or any interested party may appeal the decision to the City Council. Any such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after the notice of decision of the Planning Commission appears on the City Council's agenda. The appeal must be filed in writing, stating the basis for appeal, and must be accompanied by the applicable fee.

Section 4. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 23244 was processed, including, but not limited to, public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On December 19, 2024, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on MA No. 23244, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing.
( c) All legal preconditions to adopting this Resolution have occurred. -4-
Section 5. California Environmental Quality Act Findings for Certification of Environmental Impact Report and Adoption of Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
(a)
and declare that:

The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine, (!) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff has considered the potential environmental impacts of the three-year Extension of Time for Site Development Permit No. 16043. City staff has also reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Statement of Overriding Consideration, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the project and adopted by the City Council on October 29, 2020. Staff has prepared a Previous Environmental Document Review Determination (PED) in accordance with CEQA for the Project. (2) Based on that review, the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department has determined that the Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, and that the Project does not involve new information of substantial importance which shows that the Project will have significant effects not discussed in the prior EIR. All potential environmental impacts associated with Site Development Permit No. 16043 and the three-year Extension of Time are adequately addressed and are reduced to a level that is less than sign ificant.
(3) The adopted FEIR determined that the previously approved Project would result in no impacts or less than significant environmental impacts under the following issue areas: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology/Water Quality, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population/Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Utilities/Service Systems.
( 4) The adopted FEIR determined that the development accommodated by the Project would result in sign ificant and unavoidable impacts to Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Land Use and Planning, and Transportation and Traffic. (5) Approval of the extension of time will incorporate mitigation measures as required by the adopted Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted with theFEIR.
(b) The City Council has independently reviewed the Previous Environmental Document Review Dete1mination, and based upon the whole record before it, and based on its independent review and judgment, finds that that the Project, is not subject to further environmental review pursuant to the Guidelines because:
(!) Based on the Interagency Development Review Process and the Planning Department Staff Report for MA23244 and, the extension of time approval would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different -5-
mitigation measures than those identified in the FElR. The effects associated with the extension of time (EOT) would be substantially the same as those reported for the approved FEIR, and is within the scope of the analysis contained in the FEIR and the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified in the FEJR, thus no Supplemental or Subsequent Environmental Review is required.
( c) The EOT request has been evaluated against the previous analysis in the ElR, to ensure that extending the approval time does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously. It has been determined that the analyses and the conclusions in the EIR remain valid and that the project currently under review is "within the scope" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (a)
( d) The custodian of records for the ElR prepared for MA No. 16224 and the Previous Environmental Document Review Determination for MA No. 24282, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's action is based, is the Community Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public review in the Community Development Department at 8930 Limonite A venue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.

Section 6. Findings for Approval of Extension of Time for Site Development Permit No. 16043. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the second proposed Extension of Time for Site Development Permit No. 16043 should be granted because:
(a) The Applicant is seeking a one-year extension of time for a Site Development Permit to develop approximately 7.01 acres ofreal property located on the northeast corner of Mission Boulevard and Crestmore Road (APNs: 179-330-002, -003, -004, -005, and - 006) with a mixed-use development consisting of a 28,015 square foot commercial building on a

1.81-acre parcel and fifty-seven (57) multi-family affordable housing dwelling units on a 5.20- acre parcel.
(b) The proposed use conforms with all the requirements of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley. The property is zoned Commercial Retail (CR) and High-Density Residential (HDR) and the uses proposed under SDP16043 are consistent with these General Plan designations. Section 9.80.020.A.(12) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that two- family dwellings, multiple-family dwellings, bungalow courts and apartment houses are allowed in the R-3 Zone, providing a Site Development Permit shall first have been obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.330 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. Sections 9.140.020.A. and 9 .140.020.B. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provide that certain commercial and office uses are permitted on any site within the East Village planning sub-area of the R-VC Zone subject to a Site Development Permit approved pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.330 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
-6-
(c) In approving SDP16043, the City Council found that the overall development of the land was found to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, and to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The development of land under SPD16043 remains the same as the applicant is only seeking an extension of time to construct the project that was previously approved.
(d) SPD16043EOT2 are subject to a condition, which prohibits the sale of any existing or subsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Title 7, in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.
( e) The Applicant has provided a letter providing reasons for not using the site development permit within the required time. The Applicant says that they continue to work on developing the site. The applicant continues to work on finalizing their tentative parcel map and they continue to seek funding for the project to commence construction.

Section 7. Findings for Approval of Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 37256. The City Council of the City ofJurupa Valley does hereby find, determine, and declare that the second proposed one-year Extension of Time for TPM No. 37256 should be granted because:
(a) The proposed one-year Extension of Time for TPM No. 37256 continues to meet all requirements of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code in that the parcels will be divided to meet all criteria.
(b) The proposed land division continues to be consistent with the 2017 Jurupa Valley General Plan and the General Plan land use designation of Commercial Retail (CR) and High Density Residential (HDR) in that the land is suitable for the proposed commercial and residential, mixed use, subdivision, including floor-to-area ratio; ( c) The design or improvement of the proposed land division continues to be consistent with the Jurupa Valley General Plan in that the land division is consistent with the commercial development policies within the General Plan. ( d) The site of the proposed land division continues to be physically suitable for the type of development, will accommodate the proposed commercial development, and will be graded according to applicable code standards.
( e) The site of the proposed land division continues to be physically suitable for the proposed density of the development in that the proposed land division is consistent with the vision of the Jurupa Valley General Plan for commercial growth development for the subject area and the water and sewer purveyor, Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD), issued a "will serve" letter stating that water and sewer service will be available to the development. ( f) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements, as conditioned and with the imposition of mitigation measures, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. -7-
(g) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that the land division has been designed to be harmonious with the surrounding community and provides for safe on-site traffic and pedestrian circulation.
(h) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division in that the proposed tentative parcel map and development plans have been prepared to prevent any such conflicts.

Section 8. Approval of Master Application No. 24282. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves a second one-year Extension of Time for Site Development Permit No. 16043 (Master Application No. 24282) and a second one-year Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 37256 to permit a mixed-use development project consisting of a 28,015 square-foot commercial building on a 1.81-acre parcel and fifty-seven (57) multi-family affordable-housing dwelling units on a 5.20-acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Mission Boulevard and Crestmore Road (APNs: 179-330-002, -003, -004, -005, and - 006).

Section 9. Certification. The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of December 2024.

Guillermo Silva
Mayor
ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-8-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024-131 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of December 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
· IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of December 2024. -9-
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Previous Environmental Document Report
Previous Environmental Document (PED)
Review Determination
Rubidoux Gateway Plaza
Mission Villas
MA24282
for
Extension of Time
Tentative Parcel Map 37256EOT2
Site Development Permit 16043EOT2
Lead Agency
City of Jurupa Valley
8390 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Roberto Gonzalez, Senior Planner
(951) 332-6464
[email protected]
Project Proponent:

Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC)
10071 Feron Blvd.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730
October 29, 2024
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024

1.0 DETERMINATION
Based on the evaluation in Section 4.0 of this document, I find that all potentially significant effects have been avoided or mitigated according to the Final Environmental Impact Report {FEIR), State Clearinghouse {SCH) #2018061047), City of Jurupa Valley Master Application 16224, certified on October 29, 2020. Therefore, the Project is "within the scope" of the previously certified EIR. According to PRC §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162, CEQA does not require the preparation of any further environmental review.

Signature
Joe Perez, Community Development Director
Printed Name/Title
City of Jurupa Valley
Lead Agency
October 29, 2024
Date

2.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT REVIEW (PED)
Once an environmental impact determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has been approved or certified for a project, no further action is required unless further discretionary approval for that project is required. CEQA Guidelines §15162 Subsequent El Rs and Negative Declarations, allows a previously adopted EIR or MND to be used as the environmental assessment for a project requiring further discretionary approval if it is determined that the Project currently under review does not propose substantial changes to the previously adopted or certified CEQA documentation that would:
1) Create one or more new significant impacts.
2) Create impacts that are more severe.
3) Require major revisions to the CEQA document.

This PED has been prepared to determine if the Extension of Time requests are within the scope of the analysis contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report {FEIR), Master Application 16224, adopted by the Planning Commission on October 29, 2020 by Resolution No. 2020-54, to ensure that by extending the time of approval, the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously.
2 MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
The previously adopted Final FEIR is on file with the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, and is hereby incorporated by reference according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150.

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The approved Project is a mixed-use development consisting of a 1.81-acre parcel for a 28,015 square foot commercial building and a 5.20-acre parcel for 57-unit multi-family affordable housing development totaling 83,032 square feet. The project includes parking, landscaping, internal paving, walkways, community center, and pool facility space.

The Project site are located at the northeast corner of Mission Boulevard and Crestmore Road. The parcels are also identified by the following Assessor Parcel Numbers: 179-330-002, 003, 004, 005, and 006.

This is the 2nd request for a one-year extension of time (EOT) for the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) and for the Site Development Permit (SOP). The first EOT for TPM37256 was approved as part of MA23244 and SDP16043 approved as part of MA22298. These 2nd EOT requests do not propose to amend boundaries, change the number of parcels, or propose any changes to infrastructure or utilities that are different than the previously approved Project.

4.0 ANALYSIS
Previously Identified Environmental Impacts
The adopted FEIR determined that the previously approved Project would result in no impacts or less than significant environmental impacts under the following issue areas: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology/Water Quality, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population/Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Utilities/Service Systems.

The adopted FEIR determined that the development accommodated by the Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Land Use and Planning, and Transportation and Traffic.

Current Environmental Impacts
When the Project was approved in 2020, the Project site was highly disturbed land bordered by Mission Boulevard to the south, Crestmore Road to the west, the Santa Ana River to the east, and residential and vacant land to the north. The site has been subject to historic human disturbances, evidenced by several transient residences and their dogs, trash, signs of tire tracks, old paved roads, and signs of disking activities throughout the property. Existing habitat on the site consists primarily of non-native, ruderal vegetation and non-native grasses. The ruderal 3 MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
vegetation present within the project area consists of low-growing perennial plants and some taller trees. The dominant plant species include tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), California pepper tree (Schinus molle), caster bean (Ricinus communis), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), tamarisk (Tamarix spp), ripgut (Bromus diandrus), coastal heron's-bill (Erodium cicutarium), slender oat (Avena barbata), and stinknet (Oncosiphon piluliferum). No suitable habitat for any sensitive species exists within the Project site.

The site has been subject to historic human disturbances, evidenced by previous transient residences, debris and trash, old paved roads, and disking activities. The topography of the Project site is relatively flat, approximately 778 feet above average mean sea level (AMSL).

Because construction has not occurred and the property remains highly disturbed, the environmental impacts identified in 2020 remain the same as indicated in the aerial photographs from 2020 and 2024 in Exhibits 4.0-1 and 4.0-2.

Source Google Earth Pro
4 MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
Exhibit 4.0-2 Aerial Photograph October 2024
Source Google Earth Pro
Applicability of the 2020 Certified FEIR
.,..

If the extension of time (EOT) for the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) is approved, the Project will incorporate the following as required by the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with the FEIR:
• Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) - These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project-based on federal, state, or local law currently in place, which effectively reduce environmental impacts. • Mitigation Measures (MM) - These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance with the provisions of CEQA. The MMs are summarized in Table 4.1 Environmental Impacts Mitigation Summary.
5 MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
Table 4.1 Environmental Impacts Mitigation Summary.

Environmental Mitigation Measures (MM) Required to Reduce Impact Topic/Threshold
Aesthetics
a. Have a substantial adverse No Mitigation Measures Required. effect on a scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic No Mitigation Measures Required. resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic
highway?
c. Substantially degrade the No Mitigation Measures Required. existing visual character or
quality of public views of the
site and its surroundings?
d. Create a new source of No Mitigation Measures Required. substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
a. Convert Prime Farmland, No Mitigation Measures Required.

Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning No Mitigation Measures Required. for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning No Mitigation Measures Required. for, or cause rezoning of,
forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by
Government Code section
51104(g))?
6 Level of
Significance
No Impact
No Impact
No Impact.

No Impact.

No Impact
No Impact
No Impact
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
d. Result in the loss of forest
land or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
e. Involve other changes in
the existing environment
which, due to their location or
nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to
non-forest use?
Air Quality
a. Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality plan.
b.: Violate any air quality
standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is
non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d. Expose sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
No Mitigation Measures Required.

No Mitigation Measures Required.

MM AQ-1: Construction equipment comply with EPA/CARB
Tier 3 emissions standards during all construction phases and will ensure that all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications.
e. Create objectionable odors No Mitigation Measures Required. affecting a substantial number
of people?
Biological Resources
7 No Impact
No Impact
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
No Impact
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
a. Have a substantial adverse MM 8/0-1: Preconstruction Burrowing_ Owl Surve� effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local 9r
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse No Mitigation Measures Required. effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural
community identified in local
or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the
California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse No Mitigation Measures Required. effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with MM 810-2: Nesting_ Bird Surve� the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
e. Conflict with any local MM 8/0-3: Tree Preservation and Ree_lacement policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
8 Less than
significant.

No Impact
No Impact
Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
f. Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Cultural Resources
a: Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined
in CEQA Guidelines§
15064.5?
b: Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of
an archaeological resource
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
§ 15064.S or a tribal cultural
resource pursuant to Public
Resource Code 21074?
c: Directly or indirectly
destroy a unique
paleontological resource or
site or unique geological
feature?
d. Disturb any human
remains, including those
interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
Geology and Soils
a. Expose people or structures
to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
1) Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for the
area or based on other
substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division
MM 8/0-1, 8/0-2, and 810-3 shall apply.

No Mitigation Measures Required.

MM CR-1 Archaeolog_ical Monitoring_.

MM CR-2 Archeolog_ical Treatment Plan.

MM CR-3 Paleontolog_ical Monitoring_.

MM CR-4 Paleontolog_ical Treatment Plan
No Mitigation Measures Required.

No mitigation measures are required.
9 Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

Less than
significant
Less than
significant
less than
significant.

MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
2) Strong seismic ground No mitigation measures are required. shaking?
3) Seismic-related ground MM GE0-1: ComeJiance with Preliminar'{_ failure, including liquefaction? Investigation.
4) Landslides? No mitigation measures are required.
b. Result in substantial soil No mitigation measures are required. erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic MM GE0-1: ComeJiance with Preliminar'{_ unit or soil that is unstable, or Investigation.
that would become unstable
as a result of the Project, and
potentially result in on-site or
offsite landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive No mitigation measures are required. soil, as defined in the Uniform
Building Code, creating
substantial risks to life or
property?
e. Have soils incapable of No mitigation measures are required. adequately supporting the use
of septic tanks or alternative
waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not
available for the disposal of
waste water?
Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change
a: Generate greenhouse gas No mitigation measures are required. emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?
b: Conflict with applicable No mitigation measures are required. plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
10 Less than
significant.

Soils Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

Soils Less than
significant
Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
a: Create a significant hazard No mitigation measures are required. to the public or the
environment through the
routine transport, use or
disposal of hazardous
materials?
b: Create a significant hazard No mitigation measures are required. to the public or the
environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions
involving the release of
hazardous materials into the
environment?
c: Emit hazardous emissions No mitigation measures are required. or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials,
substance, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school?
d: Be located on a site, which No mitigation measures are required. is included on a list of
hazardous materials compiled
pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would create a
significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e: For a project site located No feasible mitigation.
within the airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the
Project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or
working in the Project area?
f. For a project within the No mitigation measures are required. vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the Project result in a
safety hazard for people
residing or working in the
Project area?
11 Less than
significant.

Less than
significant
No Impact
Less than
significant
Significant and
unavoidable.

Less than
significant
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
g: Impair implementation of No mitigation measures are required. or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h: Expose people or No mitigation measures are required. structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk
of loss, injury, or death
involving wildland fires,
including where wild lands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Hydrology and Water Quality
a: Violate any water quality No mitigation measures are required. standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b: Substantially deplete No mitigation measures are required groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net
deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would
drop to a level which would
not support existing land
uses or planned uses for
which permits have been
granted).
c: Substantially alter the No mitigation measures are required existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including
through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in
a manner which would result
in a substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?
ii);
iii) Create or contribute runoff
water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial
12 Less than
significant
No Impact
Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
additional sources of polluted
runoff; or
iv) Impede or redirect flood
flows.
d. Substantially alter the No mitigation measures are required existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including
through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase in the
rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or
off-site?
e: Create or contribute runoff No mitigation measures are required which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned
storm water drainage systems
or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted
runoff?
f: Otherwise substantially No mitigation measures are required degrade water quality?
g: Place housing within a 100- No mitigation measures are required year flood hazard as mapped
on a Federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance
Rate Map or other flood
hazard delineation map?
h: Place within a 100-year No mitigation measures are required flood hazard area structures,
which would impede or
redirect flood flows?
i: Expose people or structures No mitigation measures are required to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving
flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
j: Inundation by seiche, No mitigation measures are required tsunami, or mudflow?
i Land Use and Planning
a: Physically divide an No mitigation measures are required. established community.
b: Conflict with any applicable No feasible mitigation
13 Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

Less Than
Significant
Significant and
unavoidable.

MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the Project
(including, but not limited to
the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for
the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental
effect?
c: Conflict with any applicable
habitat conservation plan or
natural community
conservation plan?
Mineral Resources
a: Resultinthelossof
availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of
value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b: Result in the loss of
availability of a locally
important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a
local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
Noise
a: Exposure of persons to or
generation of noise levels in
excess of standards
established in the local
general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b: Exposure of persons to or
generation of excessive
ground borne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c. A substantial permanent
increase in ambient noise
levels in the Project vicinity
above levels existing without
the Project?
d. A substantial temporary or
periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the Project
MM 810-1: Preconstruction Burrowing_ Owl Surve
No mitigation measures are required.

No mitigation measures are required.

MM NOl-1: Construction Noise Mitig_ation Plan.

MM NOl-2:Vibration Notes on Grading_ Plan: Loaded
trucks and dozers shall be prohibited within 90 feet of nearby occupied sensitive residential homes
MM NOl-1: Construction Noise Mitig_ation Plan.

MM NOl-1: Construction Noise Mitig_ation Plan.
14 Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

Less than
significant
Less than
significant
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
vicinity above levels existing
without the Project?
e. For a project located within
an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the
Project expose people residing
or working in the Project area
to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the
vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the Project expose
people residing or working in
the Project area to excessive
noise levels?
Population and Housing
a: Induce substantial
population growth in the area,
either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial
numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction
of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial
numbers of people,
necessitating the construction
of replacement housing
elsewhere?
' Public Services
1) Fire Protection: The
proposed project would not
result in a substantial adverse
physical impact associated
with the provisions of new or
physically altered
governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the
construction of which could
cause significant
No mitigation measures are required.

No mitigation measures are required.

No mitigation measures are required.
15 Less Than
Significant
Less Than
Significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times
or other performance
objectives for fire protection
services.
2) Police Protection: The No mitigation measures are required. proposed project would not
result in a substantial adverse
physical impact associated
with the provisions of new or
physically altered
governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the
construction of which could
cause significant
environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times
or other performance
objectives for police
protection services.
3) Schools? No mitigation measures are required.
4) Parks? No mitigation measures are required.
5) Other public facilities? No mitigation measures are required.

Recreation
a: Would the Project increase No mitigation measures are required. the use of existing
neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b: Does the Project include No mitigation measures are required. recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational
facilities, which might have an
adverse physical effect on the
environment?
16 Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
Transportation / Traffic
a: Conflict with an applicable MM-TRA-1: Fair Share Pay_ment Rubidoux Blvd. and plan, ordinance or policy Mission Blvd. Intersection {#3l lmerovements. establishing measures of
effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation
system, taking into account all
modes of transportation
including mass transit and
non-motorized travel and
relevant components of the
circulation system, including
but not limited to
intersections, streets,
highways and freeways,
pedestrian and bicycle paths,
and mass transit?
b. Conflict with an applicable MM-TRA-1 through MM-TRA-5. congestion management
program, including, but not MM-TRA-1: Fair Share Pay_ment Rubidoux Blvd. and limited to level of service Mission Blvd. Intersection {#3l lmerovements standards and travel demand MM-TRA-2: Fair Share Pay_ment tor Traftjc Signal at measures, or other standards Rubidoux Blvd. L SR-60 WB On Rome (Intersection #14l established by the county MM-TRA-3: Fair Share Pay_ment Rubidoux Blvd. L SR-60 congestion management EB Off Ramp_ Frontage Road (#13l. agency for designated roads MM-TRA-4: Fair Share Pay_ment Crestmore and Mission or highways? Blvd. Intersection lmerovements (Intersection #5l MM-TRA-5: Fair Share Pay_ment tor Intersection
lmerovements Rubidoux Blvd. L SR-60 WB Off.. Rome 30 th St. (Intersection #15l
c. Result in a change in air No feasible mitigation.
traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic
levels or a change in location
that results in substantial
safety risks?
d. Substantially increase No mitigation measures are required. hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e. Resu It in inadequate No mitigation measures are required. emergency access?
f. Conflict with adopted No mitigation measures are required. policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit,
17 Significant and
unavoidable.

Significant and
unavoidable.

Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
bicycle, or pedestrian
facilities, or otherwise
decrease the performance or
safety of such facilities?
Tribal Cultural Resources
a. Listed or eligible for listing
in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical
resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section
5020.l(k)?
b: A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code section
5024.1. In applying the criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of
the resource to a California
Native American tribe?
Utilities and Service Systems
a. Exceed wastewater
treatment requirements of
the applicable Regional Water
Quality Control Board?
b. Require or result in the
construction of new water or
wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the
construction of which could
cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the
construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities,
the construction of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
No mitigation measures are required.

MM TCR-1: Native American Monitoring, Treatment of
Discoveries, and Disposition of Discoveries.

No mitigation measures are required.

No mitigation measures are required.
18 Less than
significant.

Less than
significant.

Less than
significant
MA 24282- Rubidoux Gateway Plaza and Mission Villas
Previous Environmental Determination
October 29, 2024
d. Have sufficient water No mitigation measures are required. supplies available to serve the
Project from existing
entitlements and resources,
or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
e. Result in a determination No mitigation measures are required. by the wastewater treatment
provider, which serves or may
serve the Project that it has
adequate capacity to serve
the Project's projected
demand in addition to the
provider's existing
commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with No mitigation measures are required. sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the Project's
solid waste disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, No mitigation measures are required. and local statutes and
regulations related to solid
waste?
Conclusion:

Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
Less than
significant
The project site is vacant, undeveloped land that remains substantially in the same physical condition as it was in 2020 being subject to a continued variety of anthropogenic disturbances.

The Project is required to comply with existing PPPs and MMs per Resolution Number 2020-54 certifying the FEIR.

Based on the lnteragency Development Review Process for MA24282, TPM37256EOT2, and SDP16043EOT2 the approval of the EOTs would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures than those identified in the FEIR. The effects associated with the EQT would be substantially the same as those reported for the approved FEIR and is within the scope of the analysis contained in the FEIR and the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified in the FEIR, thus no Supplemental or Subsequent Environmental Review is required.
19 ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Conditions of Approval
MISSION GATEWAY PLAZA & MISSION GATEWAY VILLAS (MA16224) OCTOBER 1, 2020 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (GPA16006, CZ16011, TPM37126 AND SDP16043) CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2020-54

EXHIBITC
ALL - The condition applies to all entitlements.

SDP - The condition applies to the Site Development Permit.

TPM - The condition applies to the Tentative Parcel Map.

PLANNING DEPARTMENT

1. ALL • PROJECT PERMITTED. MA16224 (GPA16006, CZ16011, TPM37126 and SDP16043) is for an approval of Mission Gateway Plaza & Mission Gateway Villas - mixed use project consisting of commercial and 57-unit affordable housing development. The project site is located at the northeast corner of Mission Boulevard and Crestmore Road (APNS: 179-330-002, 003, 004, 005 & 006).

The approved entitlements include the following:
a. GPA16006: Change land use designation from Commercial Retail (CR) and Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) to Commercial Retail (CR) for the 1.81 - acre commercial parcel and to High Density Residential (HDR) for the 5.20-acre residential parcel.
b. CZ16011: Change the zone from R-VC (Rubidoux-Village Commercial), R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings) and A-1 (Light Agriculture) to R-VC (Rubidoux- Village Commercial) for the 1.81-acre commercial parcel and to R-3 (Multiple Family Dwellings) for the 5.20-acre residential parcel. c. TPM37126: Parcel map to merge five (5) parcels and create two (2) parcels:

Parcel 1 a 1.81-acre parcel for commercial development and Parcel 2 a 5.20- acre parcel for residential development.
d. SDP16043: Construct a 2-story, 28,015 square foot commercial development and 83,032 square-foot, 57-unit multi-family affordable housing development with community center, pool and maintenance building, and covered and uncovered ground level parking.

2. ALL - INDEMNIFY CITY. The applicant, the property owner or other holder of the right to the development entitlement(s) or permit(s) approved by the City for the project, if different from the applicant (herein, collectively, the "lndemnitor"), shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Jurupa Valley and its elected city council, its appointed boards, commissions, and committees, and its officials, employees, and agents (herein, collectively, the "lndemnitees") from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, fines, penalties, and expenses, including without limitation litigation expenses and attorney's fees, arising out of either (i) the City's approval of the project, including without limitation any judicial or administrative proceeding initiated or maintained by any person or entity challenging the validity or enforceability of any City permit or approval relating to the project, any condition of approval imposed by City on such permit or approval, and any finding or determination made and any other action taken by any of the lndemnitees in conjunction with such permit or approval, including without limitation any action taken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), or (ii) the acts, omissions, or operations of the lndemnitor and the directors,

Page 1 ends

Jurupa Valley City CouncilDecember 19, 2024

Jurupa Valley City Council
December 19, 2024