Agenda packet — Kerman City Council, November 9, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 6:00 PM
Kerman City Hall, 850 S. Madera Avenue, Kerman, CA 93630 The Council Chamber will be open to the public. This meeting will also be available for public viewing and participation through Zoom. The zoom link and telephone number listed below will provide access to the City Council meeting.

Zoom link: City Council Meeting - Meeting ID: 815 480 4966 Password: 93630 Telephone number: (669) 900-6833
Public comment accepted in person, via Zoom, and by email at: [email protected]

1. OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Welcome - Mayor
B. Call to Order
C. Roll Call
D. Invocation
At this time the Council wishes to provide anyone an opportunity to give a brief invocation or inspirational thought. In accordance with law, we would request this opportunity not be used to recruit converts, to advance anyone, or to disparage any other faith or belief. If no one steps forward, we will observe a moment of silence so that we may all focus our thoughts on how best to serve our community.

E. Pledge of Allegiance

2. AGENDA APPROVAL / ADDITIONS / DELETIONS
To accommodate members of the public or convenience in the order of presentation, items on the agenda may not be presented or acted upon in the order listed.

3. PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIAL MATTERS
A. Economic Development Corporation - Good Jobs Program (JAJ)

4. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL
This portion of the meeting is reserved for members of the public to address the Council on items of interest that are not on the Agenda and are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council.

Speakers shall be limited to three minutes. It is requested that no comments be made during this period on items on the Agenda. Members of the public wishing to address the Council on items on the Agenda should notify the Mayor when that Agenda item is called, and the Mayor will recognize your discussion at that time. It should be noted that the Council is prohibited by law from taking any action on matters discussed that are not on the Agenda. Speakers are asked to please use the microphone, and provide their name and address.
1 5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, a member of the audience or a Council Member may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and it will be considered separately.

A. SUBJECT: Minutes October 26, 2022
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as presented.

B. SUBJECT: Payroll Report 09/18/22 - 10/01/22: $175,096.04; Retro Pay & Other: $2,839.97; Overtime: $11,867.83; Standby: $1,251.97: Comp Time Earned: 25.80 RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payroll as presented.

C. SUBJECT: Warrants

1. Nos. 25338-25397 $418,079.32 ACH $83,761.61
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve warrants and electronic bank transfers as presented. (Pursuant to Government Code 37208)
D. SUBJECT: Remote City Council Meetings Under New Brown Act Requirements (AB 361) (MR) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution reauthorizing remote teleconference public meetings by the City Council and all boards, commissions, and standing committees of the City in accordance with Assembly Bill 361.

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
These hearings are scheduled at the time stated and will be heard by the Council as close to the time stated as possible.

A. SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01, Shakti Land Investments (JRO) RECOMMENDATION: Council Adopt a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01, APN: 023-220-78S and Associated Finding of Exemption Under Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183

7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. SUBJECT: User and Regulatory Fee Study Outcomes and Recommendations (JA) RECOMMENDATION: Council Consider the following:

1. Receive Report and Recommend Fee Increases and Provide feedback regarding presentation of study findings and initial recommendations.

2. Direct staff to schedule a public hearing to formally consider fee adjustments.

B. SUBJECT: Authority for Deferral of Impact Fees for Commercial Development and Approval of Agreement with Aloo, LLC for Deferral of Development Impact Fees for Site Plan Review 2021- 10, Until Certificate of Occupancy (JRO)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt two resolutions:

1. Resolution Authorizing Deferral of Impact Fees for Commercial Development; and

2. Resolution Approving an Agreement for Deferral of Development Impact Fees Between the City of Kerman and Aloo, LLC.
2 C. SUBJECT: Pre-Approved Accessory Dwelling Unit Standard Plans Program and Homeowner’s Guide (JRO)
RECOMMENDATION: Council Approve a Resolution Adopting Pre-Approved Accessory Dwelling Unit Standard Plans Program and Homeowner’s Guide and Directing Staff to Initiate the Program Upon Date of Approval
D. SUBJECT: Budget Adjustments for 1st Quarter Fiscal Year 2022-2023 (JA) RECOMMENDATION: Council review and adopt resolution amending Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget.

E. SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Well No. 14 Emergency Generator to James Day Construction, Inc. dba Coastal Mountain Electric (JJ)
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution awarding the contract for the Well No. 14 Emergency Generator to James Day Construction, Inc. dba Coastal Mountain Electric in the amount of $899,989.00 and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract.

F. SUBJECT: Consideration of Special Called Meeting (MR) RECOMMENDATION: Council discuss and consider scheduling a special called meeting regarding remote teleconference public meetings.

8. CITY MANAGER / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

9. MAYOR / COUNCIL REPORTS

10. CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 549556.9 Name of Case: City of Kerman v. The Dow Chemical Company; Shell Oil Company, also doing business as Shell Chemical Company; Occidental Chemical Corporation; FMC Corporation; Puregro Company; Wilbur-Ellis Company; J.R. Simplot Company; Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., formerly known as CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1 through 300, INCLUSIVE.

11. ADJOURNMENT
Agenda packet is available for review 72 hours prior to the meeting at the city clerk’s office and on the city website. Items received at the meeting will be available for review at the city clerk’s office.

In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate at this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (559) 846-9380. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City Clerk to make reasonable arrangement to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Pursuant to the ADA, the meeting room is accessible to the physically handicapped.

AGENDA POSTING CERTIFICATION
I, Marci Reyes, City Clerk for the City of Kerman, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I caused the above agenda to be posted at City of Kerman Council Chambers at 850 S. Madera Ave., Kerman, CA 93630 and on the City website at www.cityofkerman.org.

Date: November 4, 2022 /s/ Marci Reyes, City Clerk
3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 6:00 PM
Kerman City Hall, 850 S. Madera Avenue, Kerman, CA 93630

1. OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Welcome - Mayor
B. Call to Order
6:01 p.m.

C. Roll Call
All present except Council Member Nijjer and Herrera. Council Member Nijjer arrived 6:02 p.m.

D. Invocation
Performed by City Clerk.

E. Pledge of Allegiance
Performed by City Clerk.

2. AGENDA APPROVAL / ADDITIONS / DELETIONS
Added B. Presentation of Code Enforcement Officer Anthony Anderson.

3. PRESENTATIONS / CEREMONIAL MATTERS
A. HOME ARP Funding and County CDBG/HOME Programs - Yvette Quiroga, Fresno County Department of Public Works (JAJ)
Presented.

4. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Nehring Recused from 5.C.2
Motion made by Council Member Nijjer, Seconded by Council Member Nehring. Voting Yea:

Mayor Yep, Council Member Coleman
Approved 5.C.2
Motion made by Council Member Nijjer, Seconded by Council Member Coleman. Voting Yea:

Mayor Yep, Council Member Coleman
Recused: Council Member Nehring
4 Section 5, Item A.

A. SUBJECT: Minutes - October 12, 2022
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as presented.

B. SUBJECT: Payroll Report 09/04/22 - 09/17/22: $174,783.34; Retro Pay & Other: $3,671.83; Overtime: $19,768.48; Holiday at 1/2 Time: $1,322.04; Standby: $1,862.98: Comp Time Earned: 97.50
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve payroll as presented.

C. SUBJECT: Warrants

1. Nos. 25161-25337 $713,381.71 ACH $48,639.90

2. Exceptions. CK #25308 $99.00
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve warrants and electronic bank transfers as presented. (Pursuant to Government Code 37208)
D. SUBJECT: Monthly Investment Report
RECOMMENDATION: Council accept monthly investment report as presented.

E. SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Water Main Easement as part of Conditional Use Permit No. 17-06 for La Estrella Motel
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt the resolution accepting the water main easement as part of Conditional Use Permit No. 17-06 for La Estrella Motel.

Res. 22-76
F. SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Sewer Line Easement from the William and Lynne Souza Living Trust for the New KUSD Elementary School Site
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt the resolution accepting the sewer line easement from the William and Lynne Souza Living Trust for the New KUSD Elementary School Site.

Res. 22-77
G. SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Water Main Easement as part of Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-01 for JS West Propane Distribution Center
RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt the resolution accepting the water main easement as part of Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-01 for JS West Propane Distribution Center.

Res. 22-78

6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
5 Section 5, Item A.

7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. SUBJECT: Request for Community Services Funding - Kerman Floral & Gifts (MR) RECOMMENDATION: Council review request and direct staff accordingly.

Request for Community Services Funding approved for $360.00.

Motion made by Council Member Nehring, Seconded by Council Member Coleman. Voting Yea: Mayor Yep, Council Member Nijjer
B. SUBJECT: Award of Contract for the Vineland Ave. Rehabilitation - California to Kearney, Federal Project No. STPL-5291(029) to Cal Valley Construction, Inc.

RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution awarding the contract for the Vineland Ave. Rehabilitation - California to Kearney, Federal Project No. STPL-5291(029) to Cal Valley Construction, Inc. in the amount of $570,211.00 and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract.

Motion made by Council Member Nijjer, Seconded by Council Member Coleman.

Voting Yea: Mayor Yep, Council Member Nehring Res. 22-79

8. CITY MANAGER / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

9. MAYOR / COUNCIL REPORTS

10. CLOSED SESSION
Closed Session
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Conference with Real Property Negotiator APN: 023-204-14SU & 16SU City Negotiator: City Manager, John Jansons
Negotiation Parties: S&K Moran Family LLP
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
7:04 p.m. No Reportable Action

11. ADJOURNMENT
7:21 p.m.

MINUTES CERTIFICATION
I, MARCI REYES, City Clerk for the City of Kerman, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the above Minutes are a true depiction of all actions taken at the City Council meeting held on the first date above written at Kerman City Hall, 850 S. Madera Ave, Kerman, CA.

Date: October 27, 2022 ____________________
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
6 Section 5, Item A.

CITY OF KERMAN

PAYROLL REPORT

RETRO PAY GROSS COMP TIME
EMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNED

ADMINISTRATION
Alvarez, Josefina $ 3,572.18 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 3,572.18 - Camacho, Josie $ 2,515.54 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,515.54 0.38 Gonzalez, Diana $ 3,553.84 $ 875.96 - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 4,429.80 - Jansons, John $ 6,678.60 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 6,678.60 - Linares, Vanessa $ 1,494.15 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,494.15 - Lopez, Jacqueline $ 2,221.08 $ - 0.75 $ 30.53 - $ - - $ - $ 2,251.61 1.13 Mendoza Hernandez, Ariana $ 1,751.23 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,751.23 - Mendoza, Gabriela $ 2,019.38 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,019.38 - Reyes, Marcia $ 3,669.51 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 3,669.51 - Sandoval, Veronica $ 1,494.15 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,494.15 - TOTAL $ 28,969.67 $ 875.96 0.75 $ 30.53 - $ - - $ - $ 29,876.16 1.50

REC/SOCIAL
Acosta-Parra, Melany $ 48.75 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 48.75 - Arredondo, Raquel $ 279.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 279.00 - Brar, Manreet $ 120.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 120.00 - Burdine-Slaven, Jeanna $ 2,248.62 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,248.62 0.75 Escamilla, Paloma $ 60.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 60.00 - Espindola, Martin $ 108.75 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 108.75 - Flores, Haley $ 1,678.15 $ - 5.00 $ 157.33 - $ - - $ - $ 1,835.48 0.75 Garcia, Anthony $ 1,370.31 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,370.31 - Hurlbert, Ronald $ 438.75 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 438.75 - Jauriqui, Jose $ 576.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 576.00 - Johnson, Theresa $ 3,186.62 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 3,186.62 - Lujan, Vanessa $ 301.58 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 301.58 - Martinez, Aylah $ 521.25 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 521.25 - Martinez, Jeness $ 300.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 300.00 - Negrete, Dean $ 1,511.08 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,511.08 - Pena, Mercedes $ 288.75 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 288.75 - Reyes, Madison $ 97.50 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 97.50 -
Ruiz, Rosalba $ 592.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 592.00 - Salvador, Mark $ 2,922.72 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,922.72 - Sidhu, Nirmal $ 2,054.77 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,054.77 - Silva, Jessica $ 540.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 540.00 - Villarreal, Arlene $ 2,094.87 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,094.87 - TOTAL $ 21,339.45 $ - $ 5.00 $ 157.33 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,496.78 1.50 POLICE
Antuna, Miguel $ 2,714.12 $ - 7.50 $ 363.50 - $ - - $ - $ 3,077.62 - Arciga, Jose $ 2,358.91 $ - 33.00 $1,542.05 - $ - - $ - $ 3,900.95 - Barbosa, Isaias $ 2,839.65 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,839.65 - Barcoma, Wilbert $ 4,272.23 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 4,272.23 - Barra, Brenden $ 2,031.42 $ - 33.25 $1,169.05 - $ - - $ - $ 3,200.47 - Belding, Jeff $ 3,578.45 $ - 10.50 $ 666.27 - $ - - $ - $ 4,244.73 - Castro, Jaclynn $ 2,031.42 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,031.42 - Chapman, Tom $ 3,435.42 $ - 4.00 $ 240.92 - $ - - $ - $ 3,676.35 - Clark, Patrick $ 2,214.50 $ - 7.00 $ 276.81 - $ - - $ - $ 2,491.31 - Coronado, Krystal $ 2,018.15 $ - 17.00 $ 612.65 - $ - - $ - $ 2,630.80 - Corrales, Edith $ 840.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 840.00 - Cubillos, Theresa $ 2,764.38 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,764.38 3.75 Davis, Jeff $ 3,636.09 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 3,636.09 - Gallegos, Eric $ 2,418.52 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,418.52 - Golden, John $ 5,004.95 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 5,004.95 - Gutierrez, Gloria $ 2,135.40 $ - 2.04 $ 80.20 - $ - - $ - $ 2,215.59 - Inthasone, Bryant $ 1,875.23 $ - 18.00 $ 792.51 - $ - - $ - $ 2,667.74 1.88 Leonard, Thomas $ 1,875.23 $ - 17.12 $ 566.36 - $ - - $ - $ 2,441.60 - Levandusky, James $ 2,342.13 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,342.13 - Lopez, Matt $ 680.00 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 680.00 -
Lozano, Daniel $ 1,521.20 $ - 10.50 $ 299.49 - $ - - $ - $ 1,820.68 - Lozano, Patricia $ 1,257.23 $ - 9.00 $ 212.16 - $ - - $ - $ 1,469.39 7.50 Mendoza, Sandra $ 3,003.00 $ - 3.00 $ 141.81 - $ - - $ - $ 3,144.81 - PAY PERIOD: September 18, 2022 - October 1, 2022
OVERTIME HOLIDAY at 1/2 TIME STANDBY

Page 1 of 2 ends

Section 5, Item B.

CITY OF KERMAN

PAYROLL REPORT

RETRO PAY GROSS COMP TIME
EMPLOYEE SALARY & Other HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT HOURS AMOUNT SALARY EARNED PAY PERIOD: September 18, 2022 - October 1, 2022
OVERTIME HOLIDAY at 1/2 TIME STANDBY
Molina, Jesus $ 2,305.19 $ 162.87 12.00 $ 488.61 - $ - - $ - $ 2,956.68 - Quintanilla, Rodolfo $ 2,080.65 $ 215.22 25.50 $ 918.98 - $ - - $ - $ 3,214.84 - Rodrigues, Mary $ 2,257.69 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,257.69 0.75 Ruiz, Jose $ 1,937.73 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,937.73 - Schmidt, Lee - FINAL PAY $ 1,523.10 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,523.10 - Seroka, Dylan $ 2,776.62 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,776.62 3.75 Torres, Karina $ 969.45 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 969.45 - Velez, Bernice $ 1,645.36 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,645.36 1.50 TOTAL: $ 72,343.43 $ 1,964.01 209.41 $ 8,371.36 - $ - $ - - $ 82,678.80 19.13

PUBLIC WORKS
Arrellano, Antonio $ 1,715.69 $ - 2.50 $ 104.11 - $ - - $ - $ 1,819.80 - Barajas, Michael $ 3,412.78 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 3,412.78 - Camacho, Armando $ 1,636.31 $ - 3.50 $ 128.89 - $ - - $ - $ 1,765.20 - Castro, Joseph $ 2,818.52 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,818.52 - Cervantes, Pedro $ 1,420.31 $ - 2.50 $ 85.64 - $ - - $ - $ 1,505.95 - Garcia, Destiny $ 1,715.23 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,715.23 - Garcia, Guadalupe $ 1,420.31 $ - 3.00 $ 98.49 - $ - - $ - $ 1,518.80 - Gastelum, Humberto $ 2,922.72 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,922.72 - Guizar, Jesus $ 1,304.80 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,304.80 - Gutierrez Olivarez, Norberto $ 1,370.31 $ - 2.50 $ 85.64 - $ - - $ - $ 1,455.95 - Hernandez, Julian $ 1,715.69 $ - 23.50 $ 843.26 - $ - 32.00 $ 666.28 $ 3,225.23 - Isaak, Denise $ 2,182.15 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,182.15 - Jimenez, Gabriela $ 1,489.08 $ - 2.50 $ 89.94 - $ - - $ - $ 1,579.02 - Kaur, Harmeen $ 1,681.17 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,681.17 3.68 Lopez, Josue $ 1,489.08 $ - 24.75 $ 793.74 - $ - 29.00 $ 521.67 $ 2,804.48 - Morales, Andres $ 1,636.31 $ - 2.50 $ 99.14 - $ - - $ - $ 1,735.45 - Ortiz, Carlos $ 1,825.08 $ - 2.00 $ 88.75 - $ - - $ - $ 1,913.83 - Perez, Ruben Lopez $ 1,665.69 $ - 2.50 $ 104.11 - $ - - $ - $ 1,769.80 - Ramirez, Manuel $ 2,516.00 $ - 6.50 $ 393.12 - $ - - $ - $ 2,909.12 - Rivera, Coty $ 205.75 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 205.75 -
Rodriguez, Eduardo $ 1,305.23 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,305.23 - Sanchez, Ana - FINAL PAY $ 652.62 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 652.62 - Sanchez, Daniel $ 2,507.48 $ - 3.50 $ 215.03 - $ - - $ - $ 2,722.51 - Soto, Samuel $ 1,757.34 $ - 4.75 $ 178.74 - $ - 3.00 $ 64.03 $ 2,000.10 - Tinoco, Alfonso $ 2,210.46 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 2,210.46 - TOTAL $ 44,576.10 $ - 86.50 $ 3,308.61 - $ - 64.00 $ 1,251.97 $ 49,136.67 3.68

PLANNING
Campos, Manuel $ 1,759.54 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,759.54 - Martinez, Mabel $ 1,889.69 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 1,889.69 - Orozco, Jesus $ 3,593.15 $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - $ 3,593.15 - TOTAL $ 7,242.38 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,242.38 $ -

PLANNING COUNCIL
Bandy, R $ - Yep, G $ 125.00
Molloy, Cory $ - Herrera, I $ 125.00
Jones, C $ - Nijjer, B $ 125.00
Nunez, M $ - Coleman, J $ 125.00
Felker, R $ - Nehring, K $ 125.00
Bishop, S $ -
Villar, Victor $ -
Total $ - Total $ 625.00
GRAND TOTAL: $175,096.04 $2,839.97 301.66 $11,867.83 - $0.00 64.00 $1,251.97 $ 191,055.81 25.80

Page 2 of 2 ends

Section 5, Item B.

Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:

Gmendoza
11/1/2022 8:53 AM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
25338 BP-JOSE1 JOSEPH CROWN CONSTRUCTION 10/20/2022
082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 133 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0333 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15837 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0293 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15779 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0286 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15809 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0291 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 143 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0334 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15898 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0385 652.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15753 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0271 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 95 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0360 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 164 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0324 624.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022-15816 W MELODY AVE 21-RES-0287 419.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15865 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0301 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15789 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0289 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15781 W MELODY AVE 21-RES-0311 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15875 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0302 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 185 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0398 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15931 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0369 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15921 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0353 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 113 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0331 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 134 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0327 558.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15918 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0387 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15817 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0292 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15888 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0384 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 113 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0397 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15949 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0371 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 123 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0362 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 174 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0323 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15911 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0352 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15847 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0294 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15799 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0290 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 144 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0326 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15828 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0305 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15803 W MELODY AVE 21-RES-0313 687.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 50 N ALMOND AVE 21-RES-0270 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15895 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0303 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 105 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0375 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 143 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0364 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15969 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0354 812.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15810 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0307 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15761 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0272 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15838 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0304 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15815 W MELODY AVE 21-RES-0320 624.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15780 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0310 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 62 N ALMOND AVE 21-RES-0269 687.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 104 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0263 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 74 N ALMOND AVE 21-RES-0268 652.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15910 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0386 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15827 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0295 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15790 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0309 556.25 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 1 9 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022 15771 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0288 394.00 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15959 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0372 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15941 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0370 657.75 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 86 N ALMOND AVE 21-RES-0267 718.00 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15878 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0383 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 81 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0329 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15855 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0314 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 93 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0319 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15885 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0300 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15837 W MELODY AVE 624.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15820 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0306 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 154 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0325 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15827 W MELODY 21-RES-0321 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 114 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0262 556.25 082422 BPO -C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022 15771 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0288 162.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 122 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0328 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15983 W REGAL AVE 21-RES-0373 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 175 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0367 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15800 W SAPPHIRE 21-RES-0308 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 184 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0330 556.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15793 W MELODY AVE 21-RES-0312 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 94 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0264 584.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 15868 W REGAL AVE 22-RES-0038 652.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 163 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0336 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 123 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0332 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 140 N WALNUT AVE 21-RES-0382 619.50 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 103 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0318 490.25 082422 BPO- C&D REFUNDS FOR AUGUST 2022- 153 N KOLEEN AVE 21-RES-0335 556.25 Total for Check Number 25338: 43,140.50
Total for 10/20/2022: 43,140.50
25339 UB*01564 CLAUDIA & JUAN ROSALES 10/25/2022
Refund Check 012148-000, 281 S JOSEPH AVE 348.41
Total for Check Number 25339: 348.41
Total for 10/25/2022: 348.41
25340 11493 24 / 7 PET VETS 10/27/2022
67345 AC- EMERGENCY EXAM FOR FELINE EUTHANASIA CASE 22-3775 237.60 Total for Check Number 25340: 237.60
25341 12309 ALPHACARD 10/27/2022
INV6939244 PD- ID CARD HOLOGRAPHIC OVERLAYS 77.13
Total for Check Number 25341: 77.13
25342 10504 AUTOZONE 10/27/2022
5324101571 SFP- SUPPLIES FOR HF FLOAT 75.99
Total for Check Number 25342: 75.99
25343 10054 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 10/27/2022
222870008052 HR- NOVEMBER MEDICAL COVERAGE 45,045.97
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 2 10 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 25343: 45,045.97
25344 10617 C A REDING CO INC 10/27/2022
647951 REC- CTC- LANIER MP C307 SEPT 22 67.05
Total for Check Number 25344: 67.05
25345 12310 EVELYN CALDERON 10/27/2022
00283773 CTC- CTC DEPOSIT 10/15/22 400.00
Total for Check Number 25345: 400.00
25346 10078 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT 10/27/2022
200000001759283 C WITHHOLDING ORDER P/R DATE 10/21/22 305.07 Total for Check Number 25346: 305.07
25347 12126 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 10/27/2022
1281944 CS- GARBAGE LINERS HEAVY DUTY- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 306.44 Total for Check Number 25347: 306.44
25348 10103 COLONIAL LIFE 10/27/2022
34202051101428 HR- OCTOBER EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 576.70 34202051101428 HR- ROUNDING ADJ -0.03
Total for Check Number 25348: 576.67
25349 10104 COMCAST 10/27/2022
815550021014764 TECH- TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 10/14/22-11/13/22 - OCT 191.20 815550021026546 TECH- TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 10/14/22-11/13/22 - SR CTR 153.64 815550021026548 TECH- TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 10/14/22-11/13/22 - COMM CTR 153.64 Total for Check Number 25349: 498.48
25350 10107 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 10/27/2022 2574-1034772 STRTS- WIRE & MARKING TAPE 920.36
Total for Check Number 25350: 920.36
25351 10111 CPRS DISTRICT 7 10/27/2022
102422 CS- REGISTRATION 4 CS STAFF 120.00
102422 CS- REGISTRATION 3 PW STAFF 90.00
Total for Check Number 25351: 210.00
25352 10114 CROWN SHORT LOAD CONCRETE 10/27/2022
117221 SDWLK REP- CONCRETE FOR PD ENTRANCE REPAIR 468.59 Total for Check Number 25352: 468.59
25353 10958 VERONICA DELGADO 10/27/2022
00313882 CTC- SH DEPOSIT 10/16/22 100.00
Total for Check Number 25353: 100.00
25354 10128 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 10/27/2022
613297 PD- 5 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS 175.00
Total for Check Number 25354: 175.00
25355 10133 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/27/2022
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 3 11 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
00112693 STRT- REPAIR STREETLIGHT DAMAGE 768.89
Total for Check Number 25355: 768.89
25356 10140 E & M ELECTRIC & MACHINERY INC 10/27/2022
409242 SWR- WONDERWARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL 3,285.00
409242 WTR- WONDERWARE SOFTWARE RENEWAL 3,285.00
Total for Check Number 25356: 6,570.00
25357 10458 RAUL HERRERA ECN POLYGRAPH AND INVESTIGATIONS 10/27/2022 KERM-OCT07-2022 PD- PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLY: APPLICANT: MEJIA PORTILLO ACO 200.00 Total for Check Number 25357: 200.00
25358 11768 ERIKA EL-HELOU 10/27/2022
081222 FIN- REFUND COLONIAL OVERPAYMENT 17.96
Total for Check Number 25358: 17.96
25359 10148 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO 10/27/2022
0169048-IN PD- REPAIR AND REFINISH BADGE 48 84.86
Total for Check Number 25359: 84.86
25360 11832 EPIC BUSINESS ESSENTIALS LLC 10/27/2022
SI00463593 CS- DESK CALENDARS (8) REC ADMIN FOR ALL IN DEPT 47.95 Total for Check Number 25360: 47.95
25361 11724 FACT AUTOMATED ENTRANCES INC 10/27/2022
248979 CS- FINANCE FRONT DOOR NOT OPENING 5 POSITION SWITCH LABOR REPLA 255.10 Total for Check Number 25361: 255.10
25362 10159 FRESNO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 10/27/2022
79350 BPO- MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HOUSING ELEMENT 1,563.11 Total for Check Number 25362: 1,563.11
25363 10185 GRAINGER 10/27/2022
9481694587 CS- FAUCET OUTLET ADAPTER- BLDG MAINT 38.87
9481862432 CS- VACUUM UPRIGHT- KPE- BLDG MAINT 266.40
Total for Check Number 25363: 305.27
25364 11358 GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES10/27/2022
32558694 PD- PATROL OPS COPIER/FAX- NEW LEASE ON UPGRADED COPIER 274.27 Total for Check Number 25364: 274.27
25365 10191 H & J CHEVROLET INC 10/27/2022
28414 VE REP- KEY CUT #1444 38.14
Total for Check Number 25365: 38.14
25366 10710 HACH COMPANY 10/27/2022
13282955 WTR- WATER TESTING SUPPLIES 365.85
Total for Check Number 25366: 365.85
25367 12187 HAMNER JEWELL & ASSOCIATES 10/27/2022
201784 CS- RAILROAD ACQUISITION HART RANCH 316.75
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 4 12 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 25367: 316.75
25368 12151 HO GENERAL AUTO REPAIR AND TIRES10/27/2022
1082 PD REP- ALIGNMENT #1424 65.00
Total for Check Number 25368: 65.00
25369 10514 ICAD INC 10/27/2022
16694 WTR- TROUBLESHOOT SCADA 317.50
16694 SWR- TROUBLESHOOT SCADA 317.50
Total for Check Number 25369: 635.00
25370 10219 JENSEN & PILEGARD INC 10/27/2022
648904 VE EQUIP- STRAPS FILTERS GRINDER COIL 239.20
648913 VE EQUIP- BLOWER 216.69
Total for Check Number 25370: 455.89
25371 10222 JERRY'S AUTOMOTIVE 10/27/2022
688913 VE REP- TAIL LIGHT WIRING INSTALL #1373 250.00
688918 PD REP- AC SENSOR REPAIR #1516 960.00
Total for Check Number 25371: 1,210.00
25372 11923 JOE A GONSALVES & SON 10/27/2022
160230 ADM- PROFESSIONAL LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATION OCTOBER 2022 1,000.00 Total for Check Number 25372: 1,000.00
25373 10239 KERWEST INC 10/27/2022
22894 BPO- PUBLIC NOTICE: PUBLIC HEARING - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2022- 50.00 22894 BPO- PUBLIC NOTICE: PUBLIC HEARING - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2022- 139.80 Total for Check Number 25373: 189.80
25374 11142 KIMBALL MIDWEST 10/27/2022
100378902 VE REP- VARIOUS TOOLS FOR FLEET SHOP 420.81
100378902 PD REP- VARIOUS TOOLS FOR FLEET SHOP 420.82
100391873 WTR- VARIOUS TOOLS 121.81
100391873 SWR- VARIOUS TOOLS 121.82
Total for Check Number 25374: 1,085.26
25375 10678 MAC'S EQUIPMENT INC 10/27/2022
248925 SWR- HEX BELT SOCKET 7.62
249516 VE EQUIP- AIR FILTER FOR TORO MOWER 30.14
249572 VE EQUIP- SPARK PLUGS FOR CONCRETE SAW 17.93
250394 VE REP- DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID FOR WTR TRUCK 41.39 Total for Check Number 25375: 97.08
25376 10261 MID VALLEY DISPOSAL INC 10/27/2022
073122 SWA- CITY PORTION FOR JULY 2022 -33,164.89
073122 SWA- ROLL OFF/FRANCHISE FEES -2,578.52
073122 SWA- JULY 2022 SW CHARGES 165,824.43
083122 SWA- CITY PORTION FOR AUGUST 2022 -33,253.39
083122 SWA- AUGUST 2022 SW CHARGES 166,266.97
083122 SWA- ROLL OFF/FRANCHISE FEES -1,848.20
Total for Check Number 25376: 261,246.40
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 5 13 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
25377 11726 BONIFACIA MODESTO 10/27/2022
00264735 CTC- CTC DEPOSIT 10/22/22 400.00
Total for Check Number 25377: 400.00
25378 10265 MONTOY LAW CORPORATION 10/27/2022
101822 CC- SEPTEMBER 2022 LEGAL FEES 9,573.00
Total for Check Number 25378: 9,573.00
25380 10272 MUTUAL OF OMAHA 10/27/2022
001431502445 HR- NOVEMBER LTD INS EMPLOYEE 561.13
001431502445 HR- NOVEMBER VOLUNTARY LIFE 1,100.71
001431502445 HR- NOVEMBER LTD INS EMPLOYER 561.13
001431502445 HR- NOVEMBER LIFE INSURANCE 472.01
Total for Check Number 25380: 2,694.98
25381 10282 OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2022
266636279001 CS- ROLLING CART 20.91
266650372001 CS- HDMI CORD 65.37
266853717001 WTR- RETURNED PAPER ROLL -13.56
266853717001 WTR- RETURNED PAPER ROLL -10.03
266853717001 WTR- RETURNED PAPER ROLL -5.31
266853717001 WTR- RETURNED PAPER ROLL -1.06
267831189-001 CS- REPLACEMENT PHONE CORD 6.59
267847701001 CS- OFFICE SUPPLIES 32.07
267847703001 CS- OFFICE SUPPLIES 28.00
269155740001 WTR- OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.47
269155740001 SW- OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.58
269155740001 SWR- OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.34
269155740001 SW- OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.36
269192731001 WTR- OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.82
269192731001 SWR- OFFICE SUPPLIES 7.73
269192731001 SW- OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.46
269192731001 SW- OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.09
270455526001 SWR- OFFICE SUPPLIES, RULER, COPY PAPER, ENVELOPES, MARKERS 176.73 270455526001 WTR- OFFICE SUPPLIES, RULER, COPY PAPER, ENVELOPES, MARKERS 18.71 270455526001 SW- OFFICE SUPPLIES, RULER, COPY PAPER, ENVELOPES, MARKERS 93.56 270455526001 SW- OFFICE SUPPLIES, RULER, COPY PAPER, ENVELOPES, MARKERS 239.10 Total for Check Number 25381: 743.93
25382 10286 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC 10/27/2022
082922 PD REP- SUPPLIES- 3 INV <$50 55.99
090122 SWR- SUPPLIES- 3 INV <$50 63.15
091322 VE SUPP- SUPPLIES- 2 INV <$50 23.95
091322 VE REP- SUPPLIES- 4 INV <$50 48.73
091422 VE EQUIP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 22.60
335765 VE REP- TRUCK MIRRORS #1426 447.06
335987 PD MAINT- 1 INV <$50 28.82
336063 VE REP- GM ECM (COMPUTER) #1395 417.48
336500 VE SUPP- FILTER DRIER 77.42
336546 VE REP- IGNITION #1395 108.96
336547 VE REP- ABS MODULE #1395 567.75
337372 VE REP- SUSPENSION LINK #1444 73.93
337373 VE REP- TPMS SENSOR #1444 106.14
338969 PD REP- BATTERY #1518 191.31
339312 WTR- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 9.30
339404 VE EQUIP- AIR FILTERS FOR TORO MOWER 113.01
340308 VE REP- CORE RETURN -111.15
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 6 14 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
340610 VE REP- RETURN IGNITION FOR #1395 -108.96
340611 VE SUPP- BRAKECLEAN & NITRILE GLOVES 72.76
340647 VE REP- ANTIFREEZE PW VEHICLES 111.09
340655 VE REP- LIGHTBULBS & RADIATOR #1405 241.07
341394 VE REP- DISC PADS & BRAKE ROTORS #1459 285.06
342097 PD MAINT- AIR CABIN & OIL FILTERS FOR EXPLORERS 121.67 342140 PD REP- FAN BELT #1491 & STOCK WIPER BLADES 259.46 OCBO939229 VE SUPP- CHARGEBACK FOR CREDIT ERROR 54.06
Total for Check Number 25382: 3,280.66
25383 10289 P.G.& E. 10/27/2022
3920400666-0 STRT- MONTHLY SERVICE 09/16/22-10/14/22- OCT 4,288.90 6206788690-3 CS- CS ELEC & GAS- SEPT 2022- COMM SRVCS -235.80 6206788690-3 CS- CS ELEC & GAS- SEPT 2022- COMM SRVCS 1,368.76 6206788690-3 CS- CS ELEC & GAS- SEPT 2022 15.45
6206788690-3 CS- CS ELEC & GAS- SEPT 2022 2,054.00
6206788690-3 CS- CS ELEC & GAS- SEPT 2022 3,684.10
6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 152.37 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 304.72 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 304.72 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 609.44 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 152.36 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 609.44 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 152.36 6825025396-7 ADM- MONTHLY UTILITIES-6825025396-7- SEPT 152.36 8970493475-4 PARKS- KERCKHOFF PARK 09/09/22-10/07/22- SEPT 213.24 Total for Check Number 25383: 13,826.42
25384 10301 PETTY CASH 10/27/2022
102422 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 20.69
102422 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 81.44
102422 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 8.00
102422 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 24.84
102422 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 17.00
102422 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 16.00
102422 VAR- REPLENISH PETTY CASH 16.50
Total for Check Number 25384: 184.47
25385 10315 QUINN COMPANY 10/27/2022
PC000525498 VE EQUIP- PARTS FOR BACKHOE 352.57
PC000526652 VE EQUIP- DOOR SPRINGS FOR BACKHOE 224.55
Total for Check Number 25385: 577.12
25386 10319 RENO'S HARDWARE 10/27/2022
10755 CS- LIGHT BULBS- KPD 7.29
86 BLDG- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 6.53
86 STRTS- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 6.76
86 BLDG- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 8.71
86 SDWLK REP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 15.57
86 SFO- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 21.85
Total for Check Number 25386: 66.71
25387 10324 RIVERSIDE NURSERY & LANDSCAPE INC10/27/2022 1526 MEDIANS- PLANTS FOR MEDIANS- FOR VINELAND MEDIANS 998.77 1527 MEDIANS- PLANTS FOR MEDIANS- FOR VINELAND MEDIANS 947.16 1532 MEDIANS- PLANTS FOR MEDIANS- FOR VINELAND MEDIANS 998.77 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 7 15 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
Total for Check Number 25387: 2,944.70
25388 12186 S K NELSON & COMPANY 10/27/2022
000364 ADM- ADM-HR INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES 07/25/22-10/14/22 4,336.28 Total for Check Number 25388: 4,336.28
25389 10335 SILVA AUTO GROUP INC 10/27/2022
50268 PD REP- CRANK SENSOR #1488 50.52
Total for Check Number 25389: 50.52
25390 10337 SLUMBERGER LUMBER 10/27/2022
ACCT 3115 BLDG- SUPPLIES- 3 INV <$50 47.66
ACCT 3115 SFO- SUPPLIES- 2 INV <$50 20.46
ACCT 3115 WTR CNSRV- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 10.88
ACCT 3115 STRTS- SUPPLIES- 3 INV <$50 36.02
ACCT 3115 VE REP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 31.58
ACCT 3115 VE EQUIP- WOOD PRESERVATIVE TRAY 516.57
ACCT 3115 BLDG- PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139.69
ACCT 3115 SDWLK REP- COUNDUIT & COUPLINGS 51.94
ACCT 3115 VE SUPP- NUTS & BOLTS 212.82
ACCT 3115 SFO- PUSH BROOMS-4 95.85
ACCT 3115 SDWLK REP- SUPPLIES- 4 INV <$50 100.40
ACCT 3115 VE EQUIP- SUPPLIES- 1 INV <$50 23.41
ACCT 3115 LLD- SUPPLIES- 2 INV <$50 35.33
ACCT 3115 SDWLK REP- CONDUIT & COUPLINGS 51.94
Total for Check Number 25390: 1,374.55
25391 12054 SPARKLETTS 10/27/2022
21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 2.06 21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 8.37 21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 8.23 21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 8.37 21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 4.12 21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 11.33 21577585092522 PW- DRINKING WATER- PUBLIC WORKS 27.43
21577585092522 PW- DRINKING WATER- PUBLIC WORKS 27.42
21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 5.15 21577585092522 FIN- DRINKING WATER- ADMIN, FIN, PLANNING/BLDG, CITY CLERK- NOV 16.74 Total for Check Number 25391: 119.22
25392 UB*01565 STATE WATER RESOURCES CTRL BOARD10/27/2022 Refund Check 015884-000, 15265 W EL MAR LN 61.00
Total for Check Number 25392: 61.00
25393 12272 TEMPLO DE MISERICORDIA Y REPOSO10/27/2022
00316384 CTC- DANCE PAVILLION DEPOSIT 10/22/22 100.00
Total for Check Number 25393: 100.00
25394 10754 THE HOME DEPOT PRO-SUPPLY WORKS10/27/2022
712065465 CS- DISINFECTANT FOGGERS (2) COVID 19 FACILITY SUPPLY EQUIP 156.73 Total for Check Number 25394: 156.73
25395 10387 USA BLUE BOOK 10/27/2022
138092 SWR- SCREW EXTRACTER 181.34
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 8 16 Section 5, Item C.

Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
142822 SWR- ALUMINUM EXPANSION PLUG 944.74
Total for Check Number 25395: 1,126.08
25396 10401 WALLYS TIRE AND WHEEL 10/27/2022
1-80298 VE EQUIP- 1-245-75-R16 TIRE FOR BACKHOE 228.94
1-80474 VE EQUIP- 1-245-75-R16 TIRE FOR BACKHOE 184.77
Total for Check Number 25396: 413.71
25397 10406 WEST HILLS OIL INC 10/27/2022
74995 VE- FUEL SEPT 01-15 1219.147 GALLONS 5,958.15
74995 VE- ACT PROGRAM PD 68.788 GALLONS 345.25
Total for Check Number 25397: 6,303.40
Total for 10/27/2022: 374,590.41
Report Total (59 checks): 418,079.32
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:53 AM) Page 9 17 Section 5, Item C.

Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:

Gmendoza
11/1/2022 8:58 AM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
ACH 10147 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 10/21/2022
102122 C PR TAX DEPOSIT- 10/21/22- SDI PAYABLE= SDI AMOUNT 1,913.25 102122 C PR TAX DEPOSIT- 10/21/22- SIT PAYABLE= PIT AMOUNT 4,377.96 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10147: 6,291.21
ACH 10517 FEDERAL TAXES PAYROLL 10/21/2022
102122 C PAYROLL TAX DEPOSIT- 10/21/22 FICA MED PAYABLE=MEDICARE 5,352.70 102122 C PAYROLL TAX DEPOSIT- 10/21/22 FIT PAYABLE=TAX WITHHOLDING 13,095.34 102122 C PAYROLL TAX DEPOSIT- 10/21/22 FICA PAYABLE=SOCIAL SECURITY 22,826.26 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10517: 41,274.30
ACH 10518 KERMAN POLICE OFFICERS ASSN 10/21/2022
102122 C MEMBERSHIP DUES- 10/21/2022 831.25
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10518: 831.25
ACH 10519 KERMAN MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSN10/21/2022
102122 C MEMBERSHIP DUES- 10/21/2022 165.00
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10519: 165.00
ACH 10520 ICMA-RC 10/21/2022
102122 C LOAN PAYMENTS 2,666.80
102122 C DEFERRED COMP- 10/21/2022 2,742.40
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10520: 5,409.20
ACH 10522 CALPERS 10/21/2022
102122 C EMPLOYER PAID CONTRIBUTIONS 15,839.44
102122 EMPLOYEE PAID CONTRIBUTIONS 12,507.71
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10522: 28,347.15
Total for 10/21/2022: 82,318.11
Report Total (6 checks): 82,318.11
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 8:58 AM) Page 1 18 Section 5, Item C.

Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:

Gmendoza
11/1/2022 9:07 AM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
ACH 10522 CALPERS 10/27/2022
090922 C EMPLOYER PAID CONTRIBUTIONS- UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 3RD QTR 348.05 090922 EMPLOYEE PAID CONTRIBUTIONS 173.25
Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10522: 521.30
Total for 10/27/2022: 521.30
Report Total (1 checks): 521.30
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 9:07 AM) Page 1 19 Section 5, Item C.

Accounts Payable
User:

Printed:

Gmendoza
11/1/2022 9:12 AM
Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
Invoice No Description Reference
ACH 10644 US BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 10/27/2022
484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT - OCTOBER (PLANNING) 47.95 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT #500-0656773-000 ADMIN NEW MACHINE 111.21 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT #500-0656773-000 ADMIN NEW MACHINE 111.21 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT #500-0656773-000 ADMIN NEW MACHINE 66.73 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT #500-0656773-000 ADMIN NEW MACHINE 111.21 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT - OCTOBER (PLANNING) 47.95 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT #500-0656773-000 ADMIN NEW MACHINE 8.90 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT - OCTOBER (SR CTR) 179.82 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT - OCTOBER (PD) 115.52 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT #500-0653189-000 COMM CTR 86.10 484639166 ADM- COPIER LEASE CONTRACT #500-0656773-000 ADMIN NEW MACHINE 35.60 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10644: 922.20
Total for 10/27/2022: 922.20
Report Total (1 checks): 922.20
AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/1/2022 9:12 AM) Page 1 20 Section 5, Item C.

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 9, 2022
PRESENTER: Marci Reyes, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Remote City Council Meetings Under New Brown Act Requirements (AB 361) (MR) RECOMMENDATION: Council by motion adopt resolution reauthorizing remote teleconference public meetings by the City Council and all boards, commissions, and standing committees of the City in accordance with Assembly Bill 361.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On September 16, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 361 into law. AB 361 amends the Brown Act to allow for remote public meetings without having to comply with standard provisions and restrictions for remote meetings under the Brown. AB 361 temporarily writes into the Brown Act some remote meeting requirements the City has already met and implemented under the Governor’s prior Executive Orders issued during the COVID-19 pandemic. AB 361 includes additional requirements in the form of an initial authorizing resolution (effective for up to 30 days) and subsequent resolutions to extend the use of remote meetings for additional periods of 30 days thereafter. The bill included an urgency provision making the law immediately effective upon signature by the Governor.

The City Council adopted the following resolutions authorizing remote meetings in accordance with AB 361:
 October 13, 2022 Res No. 21-78  May 11, 2022 Res No. 22-29  November 10, 2021 Res No. 21-85  June 22, 2022 Res No. 22-39  December 22, 2021 Res No. 21-91  July 13, 2022 Res No. 22-47  January 12, 2022 Res No. 22-02  August 10, 2022 Res No. 22-62  February 9, 2022 Res No. 22-07  August 24, 2022 Res No. 22-64  March 9, 2022 Res No. 22-15  September 14, 2022 Res No 22-69  March 23, 2022 Res No. 22-20  October 12, 2022 Res No 22-75  April 13, 2022 Res No. 22-22
If the City Council wishes to continue to utilize remote meetings under AB 361, the City Council needs to adopt a reauthorizing resolution such as that attached to this staff report.

ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution
21 Section 5, Item D.

Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 22-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN REAUTHORIZING REMOTE

TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ALL BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 361 WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a statewide emergency arising from the coronavirus (COVID 19) that remains in effect; and
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N 29 20 suspending certain provisions of the Brown Act pertaining to teleconferenced meetings; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N 08 21 which indicated that Executive Order N 29 20’s authorization for holding virtual meetings would expire on September 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361 (Rivas) as urgency legislation effective immediately, which provides that legislative bodies may continue to meet remotely during a declared State of Emergency subject to certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kerman adopted a proclamation of a local emergency related to the COVID 19 virus on March 17, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kerman (“City”) is committed to preserving and fostering public access, transparency, observation, and participation in meetings of the City Council and Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees (hereafter collectively referred to as “legislative bodies”; and WHEREAS, all meetings of the City Council and legislative bodies are open and public as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Sections 54950 – 54963, so that any member of the public may attend, observe, and participate in a meaningful way; and
WHEREAS, Government Section 54953(b)(3) of the Brown Act allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings by teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to attend and to address the local legislative body, as long as the following requirements are met:

1. Each teleconference location from which a member is participating is noticed on the agenda; and

2. Each teleconference location is accessible to the public; and

3. Members of the public must be able to address the body at each teleconference location; and

4. At least one member of the legislative body must be physically present at the location specified in the meeting agenda; and

5. During teleconference meetings, at least a quorum of the members of the local body must participate from locations within the local body’s territorial jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the Brown Act, as amended by AB 361 (2021), at Government Code Section 54953(e) et seq., allows for remote observation and participation in meetings by members of a legislative body and members of the public without compliance with the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(b)(3), subject to certain conditions; and 22 Section 5, Item D.

WHEREAS, the initial required condition is a declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act at Government Code Section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state and within the boundaries of the City, caused by conditions as described in Government Code Section 8558; and WHEREAS, the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency includes area within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e)(3)(A-B) added by AB 361 provides an alternative to having public meetings in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(b)(3) when City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the COVID 19 state of emergency and that the following circumstances exist:

1. The state of emergency as a result of COVID 19 continues to directly impact the ability of the members of City Council and the members of the City’s Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees to meet safely in person; and

2. The State of California and the County of Kerman continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing.

WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e) et seq. further requires that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing or the legislative body finds that meeting in person would present an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City in that (i) State and Local officials recommend social distancing measures and (ii) emergency conditions evidenced by COVID 19 and its variants create ongoing COVID 19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths and meeting in person would present imminent risk to health or safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, the City Council affirms that it will allow for observation and participation by Council Members as well as Board, Commission, and Standing Committee Members and the public via Zoom in an effort to protect the constitutional and statutory rights of all attendees; and
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2021, the City Council adopted Res No. 21-78 and has continued every thirty days with corresponding Resolutions Authorizing Remote Teleconference Meetings by the City Council and all Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees of the City in Accordance With Assembly Bill 361; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e)(3) requires that the City Council review the need and make findings for continuing the teleconferencing as authorized by AB 361 at least once every thirty days until the Governor terminates the state of emergency; and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to affirm the need and findings necessary for continuing the teleconferencing as authorized by AB 361.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council finds that the state of emergency conditions related to COVID 19 as set forth in the Governor’s and City’s Proclamations of Emergency and are on-going. 23 Section 5, Item D.

Section 3. The City Council further finds that state and county official recommend social distancing conditions causing imminent risk to attendees as described above exist.

Section 4. The City Council hereby recognizes and affirms the existence and conditions of a state of emergency in the City of Kerman as proclaimed by the Governor and the City Council and affirms, authorizes, and proclaims the existence of a local emergency throughout the City.

Section 5. The City Council finds that the state of emergency as a result of COVID 19 continues to directly impact the ability of members of the City Council and the members of the City’s Boards, Commissions, and standing committees to meet safely in person and such fact creates an imminent health risk to such members.

Section 6. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Council and all of the Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees of City to conduct their meetings without compliance with Government Code Section 54953(b)(3), and to instead comply with the remote meeting requirements as authorized by Government Code Section 54953(e) et seq.

Section 7. The City Manager and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take all actions reasonably necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution, including, conducting open and public meetings remotely in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(e) et seq., and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act, for all City Council meetings, and all Boards, Commissions, and standing committee meetings of the City.

Section 8. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective for thirty days during which the City Council and all City legislative bodies may continue to meet remotely, without compliance with Government Code Section 54953(b)(3), but otherwise as permitted by Government Code Section 54953(e) et seq.

The foregoing resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Kerman at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 9th day of November 2022, and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
_________________________
Gary Yep
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
24 Section 5, Item D.
01236.0405/832224.1

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 9, 2022
PRESENTER: Jesus R. Orozco, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01, Shakti Land Investments (JRO) RECOMMENDATION: Council Adopt a Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01, APN:
023-220-78S and Associated Finding of Exemption Under Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant, Uma Patel of Shakti Land Investments, submitted an application for a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 2022-01) to subdivide an approximate 5.41-acre parcel of land into five (5) parcels, located at the southeast area of Whitesbridge Road (SR180), approximately 750 feet east of the S Vineland Ave, as shown in Attachment 3. The site is currently undeveloped commercial land, proposing parcels ranging from 0.68 acres to 1.62 acres. Approval of TPM 2022-01 will allow for the sale of and development of vacant parcels at a future date.

At the October 10, 2022 City of Kerman Planning Commission (Commission) meeting, the Commission considered a staff report prepared for TPM 2022-01. The Commission determined the proposed parcel map is consistent with the Kerman General Plan, Title 16 of the Zoning Ordinance, and section 66426(c) of the Subdivision Map Act. Based on an initial assessment, the Commission also determined that the project was exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to The Commission then adopted Resolution 2022-07, included as Attachment 2, which recommends the City Council approve TPM 2022-01 and the associated determination of a CEQA exemption.

BACKGROUND:

Site Information
Location Existing Land Uses General Plan Land Use Zone Districts North Dismantling Storage Yard / Undeveloped Industrial / General Commercial
M-2 / CG
South Single Family Residential Medium Density SD-R-5
East Undeveloped General Commercial GC
West Multi-Family *non-conforming Service Commercial CS 25 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832224.1
Analysis
Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 entails the subdivision of an approximate 5.41-acre parcel into five (5) parcels in order to allow for future development with commercial uses consistent with the General Commercial (CG) zone district. The proposed lots are summarized in Table 1 below, and Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 has been included as Exhibit ‘A’ with conditions of approval as Exhibit ‘B’ of the resolution.

Zoning
The site is zoned General Commercial (CC), allowing for a variety of commercial and office uses, which are diverse, visually pleasing, and convenient in terms of parking and access, attractive and used by citizens of Kerman as well as visitors to the area.

TPM 2022-01 does not include development on the site, however, permitted uses in the zone district include administrative, business, governmental and professional offices as well as service commercial and retail uses by right. Table 1 depicts the proposed parcels. Parcels are consistent with the minimum lot size requirement of the General Commercial (CC), which is 6,000 square feet or 0.14 acres for newly created parcels.

Table 1. Proposed Lot Sizes and Zoning
Proposed Parcel Lot Size Zoning
Parcel 1 0.87 ac CG (General Commercial)
Parcel 2 1.49 ac CG (General Commercial)
Parcel 3 0.75 ac CG (General Commercial)
Parcel 4 0.68 ac CG (General Commercial)
Parcel 5 1.62 ac CG (General Commercial)
Access
The subject parcels are located in the southeast area of Whitesbridge (SR 180), approximately 750 feet east of S Vineland Avenue. Primary access to each of the parcels on the project site would be via a shared access drive that runs east-west from the adjoining property to the east. Access into the commercial complex will occur from Whitesbridge Road (Highway 180). Water, sewer, and storm drainage infrastructure have been completed per TPM 2019-01. The newly created parcels will have access to connect to the said infrastructure. Appropriate improvements would be installed at the time of construction for each parcel.

Subdivision Map Act
The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will create five (5) parcels consistent with Section 66426(c) of the Subdivision Map Act. The tentative parcel map shows the preliminary design of the proposed land division and allows various City departments to determine that the design is in conformity with the General Plan’s goals and policies. A Final Parcel Map will be filed and recorded following approval of the Tentative Parcel Map.
26 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832224.1
Subdivision Ordinance
In order to approve the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, the Subdivisions Ordinance requires the proposed parcel map be consistent with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the Subdivision Map Act. Based on the following analysis and findings, staff recommends approval of the Tentative Parcel Map:
(a) The proposed map is consistent with the applicable General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, Specific Plan, and the Subdivision Map Act.

The procedural requirements of the Map Act are being followed and all parcels comply with the Kerman applicable general plan and engineering and zoning standards pertaining to grading, drainage, utility connections, lot size, and density. There is no applicable specific plan governing the site. Additionally , the proposed project qualifies for a parcel map as i) the land is zoned for commercial development; ii) each of the parcels has approved access to a public street or highway with the required cross access easements, and iii) said public streets or highways are consistent with the street alignments and widths approved by the City Council . The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, including Goal LU-1, Policy LU-1.4, Goal LU-2, Policy LU2.6, Policy LU-2.9, Goal LU-3, and Policy LU-3.6, as further described below, (b) The design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general plan and specific plans.

The parcel map is consistent with the Kerman General Plan – the proposed parcels comply with minimum lot size standards for the commercial uses consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There is no applicable specific plan governing the site. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development.

The parcel map will create five (5) parcels that have adequate land area to support various commercial land uses with standard setbacks and ample useable space. As depicted in Exhibit ‘B’, the parcels will range from .68 acres to 1.62 acres. Any subsequent development would be required to be consistent with the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and this parcel map. There are no unusual conditions that would render the site physically unsuitable for such subsequent commercial development.
(d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The parcel map will create five (5) parcels, adequate land area to support various commercial uses with standard setbacks and ample useable space As depicted in Exhibit ‘B’, each parcel will range from .68 acres to 1.62 acres. Any subsequent commercial development would be required to be consistent with the General Plan’s goals and policies, the zoning ordinance, and this parcel map.

Such consistency would likewise require consistency with setbacks, height, floor area ratio (FAR) requirements, and other requirements that would ensure suitable density of development, (e) The design of the parcels or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat.

The project site is not located in a sensitive environment but rather in an area surrounded by developed residential land and other general commercial land uses. This division of land does not propose the development of structures and anticipated physical changes to the site would include minimal improvements to facilitate future commercial development. Further, any future physical improvements subject to discretionary approval on the project site would be subject to a separate 27 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832224.1
environmental review on a project-and-site-specific basis, in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and applicable CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, the proposed creation of five (5) new parcels would not result in a substantial adverse effect to special status species, riparian or other natural habitat, wetlands, movement of migratory fish or wildlife species, or conflict with any local, regional, or state preservation or conservation plans as analyzed in the General Plan EIR. (f) The design of the design of the land division or the type of improvements being required is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The parcels created will comply with all applicable sanitary sewer, water service, and storm water runoff requirements, as well as other similar environmental and life safety regulations and standards. Thus, the project is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) The design of the parcels or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public-at-large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

There are no public easements that currently encumber the property to be parceled, and all modifications made to the existing public improvements fronting the parcels upon development of the properties will be required to current City standards. (h) The proposed design provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the subdivision pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1.

This parcel map is not a subdivision that is contemplated by Government Code Section 66473.1.

Additionally, current and future construction will be required to comply with regulations related to passive of natural heating or cooling opportunities. The design of the proposed parcel map does not inhibit such use.

General Plan Consistency
Staff has evaluated the project for consistency with the goals and policies contained in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The following goals and policies reflect Kerman’s desire for a balanced community that is economically viable, provides for a variety of housing needs, and retains its small town character. Approval of TPM 2022-01 will directly or indirectly provide compliance with the following General Plan’s goals and policies.

Goal LU-1: To guide the development of a mix of land uses that fulfill resident’s daily needs and provide recreational and entertainment amenities.

Policy LU-1.4 Limit Residential Development Along Highways Goal LU-2: To enhance the design, character, and vibrancy of Kerman as a family-friendly hometown community representative of the Central Valley Policy LU-2.9: Utility Service Line Placement
Goal LU-3: To create a land use pattern that protects agricultural and open space lands by promoting compact and centralized urban growth around the historical Kerman townsite.
28 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832224.1
Policy LU-3.6: Infill and Renovation
Policy LU-2.6 Gateway Features
Environmental Review
The project is exempt from CEQA review as a project consistent with a community plan, general plan, or zoning policies for which an environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared, meeting the requirements of this exemption commonly referred to as the “community plan exemption” governed by the CEQA statute at Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and by CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. Here, the City approved the 2024 City of Kerman General Plan, and prepared and certified an EIR for the same. As noted above, this project proposes the division of land into five parcels consistent with the General Plan, and there is no specific construction or subsequent use proposed for the same. The mere approval of the Parcel Map would not result in any new potentially significant on- or off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR and environmental review, and no aspects peculiar to the project or the parcels that would result in new effects. There is no new information of substantial importance that would result in significant effects not discussed in the previous document or substantially increase the severity of effects previously disclosed. While typically any feasible mitigation measures in the EIR would normally be undertaken and apply to the project, in this particular case there are no such applicable mitigation measures required to be undertaken. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further analysis is required, and the City Council adopts an exemption for this project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and by CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 FISCAL IMPACT:

None
ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution w/Exhibits
B. Environmental Analysis CEQA Guidelines § 15183
C. Planning Commission Resolution 2022-07
D. Aerial Map
29 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832211.1
Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION NO. 22-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF KERMAN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2022-01, APN: 023-220-78S, AND ASSOCIATED FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21083.3 AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183 WHEREAS, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) application has been filed by Shakti Land Investments LLC for the division of an approximate 5.41-acre parcel of land into five (5) parcels, located at the southeast area of Whitesbridge Road (SR180), approximately 750 feet east of the S Vineland Ave.; and WHEREAS, City staff has conducted necessary investigations to assure the proposed division of land would be consistent with the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and the State Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, a written report was prepared by staff which included a recommendation for approval of this Tentative Parcel Map subject to conditions attached herein as Exhibit ‘B’; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing and consideration of all the evidence before it Monday, October 10, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended approval of TPM 2022-01 and the associated determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to the City Council; and WHEREAS, a public notice was circulated to adjacent properties and published in the local newspaper on Wednesday October 26, 2022 as required by law, and a public hearing was duly held; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing and consideration of all the evidence before it, the City Council now desires to approve Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 and to approve the associated CEQA for the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Kerman City Council does resolve as follows:

1. CEQA: Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council finds in concurrence with the Planning Commission, that the parcel map is exempt from CEQA review as a project consistent with a community plan, general plan, or zoning policies for which an environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared, meeting the requirements of this exemption commonly referred to as the “community plan exemption” governed by the CEQA statute at Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and by CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. Here, the City approved the 2024 City of Kerman General Plan, and prepared and certified an EIR for the same. As further discussed below, this project proposes the division of land into five parcels consistent with the General Plan, and there is no specific construction or subsequent use proposed for the same. The mere approval of the Parcel Map would not result in any new potentially significant on- or off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR and environmental reviews, and no aspects peculiar to the project or the parcels that would result in new effects. There is no new information of substantial importance that would result in significant effects not discussed in the previous document or substantially increase the severity of effects previously disclosed. Finally, the City Council finds that while typically any feasible mitigation measures in the EIR would normally be undertaken and apply to the project, in this particular case there are no such applicable mitigation measures required to be undertaken. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 30 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832211.1
15183, no further analysis is required, and the City Council adopts an exemption for this project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and by CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

2. Findings: The Planning Commission finds that all findings required for approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 can be made, including those required by the City of Kerman Municipal Code Section

16.16.030:
(a) The proposed map is consistent with the applicable General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, Specific Plan, and the Subdivision Map Act.

The procedural requirements of the Map Act are being followed and all parcels comply with the Kerman applicable general plan and engineering and zoning standards pertaining to grading, drainage, utility connections, lot size, and density. There is no applicable specific plan governing the site. Additionally, the proposed project qualifies for a parcel map as i) the land is zoned for commercial development; ii) each of the parcels has approved access to a public street or highway with the required cross access easements, and iii) said public streets or highways are consistent with the street alignments and widths approved by the City Council. Finally, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, including Goal LU-1, Policy LU-1.4, Goal LU-2, Policy LU-2.6, Policy LU-2.9, Goal LU-3, and Policy LU-3.6,
(b) The design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with the applicable general plan and specific plans.

The parcel map is consistent with the Kerman General Plan – the proposed parcels comply with minimum lot size standards for commercial uses consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There is no applicable specific plan governing the site. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development.

The parcel map will create five (5) parcels that have adequate land area to support various commercial land uses with standard setbacks and ample useable space. As depicted in Exhibit ‘A’, the parcels will range from .68 acres to 1.62 acres. Any subsequent development would be required to be consistent with the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and this parcel map. There are no unusual conditions that would render the site physically unsuitable for such subsequent commercial development.
(d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The parcel map will create five (5) parcels, adequate land area to support various commercial uses with standard setbacks and ample useable space As depicted in Exhibit ‘A’, each parcel will range from .68 acres to 1.62 acres. Any subsequent commercial development would be required to be consistent with the General Plan’s goals and policies, the zoning ordinance, and this parcel map.

Such consistency would likewise require consistency with setbacks, height, floor area ratio (FAR) requirements, and other requirements that would ensure the suitable density of development, (e) The design of the parcels or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat. 31 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832211.1
The project site is not located in a sensitive environment but rather in an area surrounded by developed residential land and other general commercial land uses. This division of land does not propose the development of structures and anticipated physical changes to the site would include minimal improvements to facilitate future commercial development. Further, any future physical improvements subject to discretionary approval on the project site would be subject to a separate environmental review on a project-and-site-specific basis, in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and applicable CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, the proposed creation of five (5) new parcels would not result in a substantial adverse effect on special status species, riparian or other natural habitats, wetlands, movement of migratory fish or wildlife species, or conflict with any local, regional, or state preservation or conservation plans as analyzed in the General Plan EIR. (f) The design of the land division or the type of improvements being required is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

Thus, the project is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) The design of the parcels or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public-at-large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

There are no public easements that currently encumber the property to be parceled, and all modifications made to the existing public improvements fronting the parcels upon the development of the properties will be required to comply with current City standards. (h) The proposed design provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities for the subdivision pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1.

This parcel map is not a subdivision that is contemplated by Government Code Section 66473.1.

Additionally, current and future construction will be required to comply with regulations related to passive natural heating or cooling opportunities. The design of the proposed parcel map does not inhibit such use.

In conclusion, the City Council, after considering all evidence presented, finds that approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 will promote the orderly growth and development of the City.

3. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map: Given the foregoing, the City Council approves Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 attached as Exhibit ‘A’ with conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit ‘B’.

4. Effective Date of Resolution: This Resolution shall be effective immediately. 32 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/832211.1
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City of Kerman City Council held on the 9 th of November 2002, and passed at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

The foregoing resolution is approved.
____________________________
Gary Yep
Attest: Mayor
______________________________
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
33 Section 6, Item A.

ALCANTARA APN: 023-220-005-S SERVICE COMMERCIAL
FLORES, ET AL APN: 023-220-015-S MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3
PARCEL 5
PARCEL 4
PARCEL 1
TRACT 6302 91 PLATS 24-31, F.C.R. MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
TRACT 6302 91 PLATS 24-31, F.C.R. MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
PARCEL A PM19-01 76 PM 51-54, F.C.R.

WEST WHITESBRIDGE ROAD (STATE ROUTE 180)
PARCEL B PM19-01 76 PM 51-54, F.C.R. APN: 023-022-079 GENERAL COMMERCIAL PARCEL C PM19-01 76 PM 51-54, F.C.R. APN: 023-022-080 GENERAL COMMERCIAL

TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 2022-01
N
BELMONT AVE N. GOLDENROD AVE N. VINELAND AVE N. DEL NORTE AVE N. MADERA AVE W. WHITESBRIDGE ROAD
Ó
N
10/6/2022
Exhibit 'A'
34 Section 6, Item A.

Exhibit ‘B’
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01
(Shakti Land Investments)
General

1. Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 shall comply with all applicable standards of the Municipal Code and Subdivision Map Act requirements as conditioned by the City Engineer.

2. Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 is valid for two (2) years from the date of approval, unless otherwise extended by the City Council pursuant to Section 16.24.050 of the Kerman Municipal Code.

3. The filing of a Final Parcel Map must be in accordance with the checklist for the final map per Section

16.36.010 of the Kerman Municipal Ordinance and consistent with the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act.

4. Prior to the commencement of any development within the newly created parcels, the applicant/developer shall be responsible for securing the appropriate entitlement(s) e.g. Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit.

Engineering

5. The applicant shall submit a Final Parcel Map prepared by a Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer licensed to practice surveying to the City Engineer for review and approval. A current Preliminary Title Report and closure calculations shall also be submitted. Any and all rights-of-way and easements identified in the Preliminary Title Report shall be shown on the parcel map with recording data. Submit AutoCAD file(s) of the Final Parcel Map to the City Engineer.

6. Within five days after the final setting of all monuments has been completed, the engineer or surveyor shall give written notice to the City Engineer that the final monuments have been set. Upon payment to the engineer or surveyor for setting the final monuments, the developer shall present to the City Engineer evidence of the payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor.

7. The applicant shall record a notice of existing CC&Rs to ensure fulfillment, by Parcels 1-5, of the obligations of Parcel A of Parcel Map No. 19-01 under the CC&Rs recorded as Fresno County Doc. 2009-0082048 and amended by Doc. 2020-0048338 and Doc. 2020-0154431, and subsequent amendments as necessary.

8. Storm drainage shall be routed to the storm drainage system located in the common east-west drive aisle within Parcel Map No. 19-01.

9. Water service shall be provided from the existing 8” water main located in the common east-west drive aisle within Parcel Map No. 19-01.

10. Sanitary sewer service shall be provided by the existing 8” sewer main located in the common eastwest drive aisle within Parcel Map No. 19-01. 35 Section 6, Item A.

11. Future development on the newly created parcels shall with Condition of Approval 6.2.1 of TPM No. 2019-01 requiring frontage improvements consisting of sidewalk, landscaping, and related improvements shall be constructed along the full frontage of Whitesbridge Road (SR 180) consistent with frontage improvements to the east along the Walmart Shopping Center.

12. Future development on the newly created parcels shall comply with Condition of Approval 11 of TPM No. 2019-01 requiring a block wall between the commercial and residential use, prior to issuance of final occupancy. The block walls shall be installed along the southern and eastern limits of this parcel map, abutting Tract No. 6302.

Planning

1. The applicant shall record a reciprocal cross-access and parking agreement between the newly created parcels prior to map recordation as approved as to form by the City Attorney. Said agreements shall be maintained in perpetuity unless otherwise abandoned or removed as authorized by the City Engineer for the City of Kerman, which shall not occur unless the affected parcels have access to a public street or highway.

2. The applicant shall prepare a Shopping Center Master Plan showing locations of shared access drives, easements, and landscaping prior to development on the newly created parcels.

3. The applicant shall record a shared maintenance agreement for the common maintenance of access drives, shared landscaping, common amenities, and any other applicable private and/or public improvements on the newly created parcels to the satisfaction of the City, as permissible by law, prior to development on the site. Said agreement shall be maintained in perpetuity unless otherwise dissolved with the permission(s) of the City of Kerman.

4. A Master Sign Program shall be prepared for the newly created parcels to be reviewed and approved consistent with Chapter 17.76 of the Municipal Code. The newly created parcels shall be limited to one freestanding monumental sign.

5. The applicant shall meet all other applicable codes and requirements as deemed necessary prior to the final recordation of the parcel map.

END OF CONDITIONS
36 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/833774.1
City of Kerman

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
CEQA GUIDELINES § 15183
1) Project Title
Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01 (Shakti Land Investments, LLC) 2) Lead Agendy Name and Adress
City of Kerman
850 S. Madera Ave.

Kerman, CA 93630
3) Contact Person and Phone Number
Jesus R. Orozco
Community Development Director
850 S. Madera Ave.

Kerman, CA 93630
559-846-6121
4) Project Location
South of W Whitesbridge Avenue between S Goldenrod Avenue and S Vineland Avenue 5) Project Sponsor
Shakti Land Investments, LLC
909 S. Madera Ave.

Kerman, CA 93630
6) General Plan Designation
GC (General Commercial)
7) Zoning
CG (General Commercial)
8) Project Description
The Project is a tentative parcel map (Tentative Parcel Map 2022-01) filed by Shakti Land Investments, LLC (applicant), proposing the create five (5) separate parcels from one (1) existing parcel located south of W. Whitesbridge Avenue between S. Goldenrod Avenue and S. Vineland Avenue (APN: 023-220-78S). This parcel map will facilitate future commercial development not proposed at this time. Improvements associated with the parcel would be required for the Project, Attachment ‘B’
37 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/833774.1
including but not limited to sidewalks, ADA paths, curb, gutter, streetlights, etc. Future development of the Project site is assumed to be in compliance with the existing General Plan, zoning, and development standards.

Previous CEQA Analysis and Purpose of Initial Study
Section 15183 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides for streamlined the environmental review of subsequent projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified by limiting its examination of environmental effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.

In approving a project meeting the requirements of this section, a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis:
(1) Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located; (2) Were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan, or community plan, with which the project is consistent;
(3) Are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action; or, (4) Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.

Based on the analysis and evaluation provided below, the project is exempt from CEQA review as a project consistent with a community plan, general plan or zoning policies for which an EIR was prepared and meets the criteria identified immediately above. This exemption is commonly referred to as the “community plan exemption” and is governed by the CEQA statute at Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and by CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

The City of Kerman 2040 General Plan (General Plan) was adopted in 2020, and a full Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019049018) (EIR) was prepared for the General Plan. As stated in CEQA Section 21083.3(b): “If a development project is consistent with the general plan of a local agency and an environmental impact report was certified with respect to that general plan, the application of this division to the approval of that development project shall be limited to effects on the environment which are peculiar to the parcel or to the project and which were not addressed as significant effects in the prior environmental impact report, or which substantial new information shows will be more significant than described in the prior environmental impact report.” The Project anticipates that future development will be compliant with the existing General Plan, zoning, and development standards. As such, an effect of the Project is not considered peculiar to the project or parcel if the City employs uniformly applied development standards that substantially mitigate environmental effects of future projects developed on the Project site. If future projects were to derive from exiting development standards, such a proposal would be subject to additional environmental review under CEQA during the discretionary project approval process.

This Project was reviewed for the following assessed in the EIR for the General Plan:
38 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/833774.1
 Aesthetics
 Agriculture and Forestry Air Quality
 Biological Resources
 Cultural Resources
 Energy
 Geology/Soils 0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
 Hydrology/Water Quality
 Land Use/Planning
 Mineral Resources
 Noise
 Population/Housing
 Public Services
 Recreation
 Transportation
 Tribal Cultural Resources
 Utilities/Service Systems
 Wildfire
 Mandatory Findings of Significance

Review of the General Plan EIR compared to the Project shows that there are no impacts peculiar to this Project or the proposed parcels. The EIR analyzed impacts that are adequately minimized through General Plan policies, compliance with law, and/or uniformly applied development standards. A subsequent Statement of Overriding Considerations was prepared for significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the EIR, including:
 Greenhouse Gas (GHG): Short-term GHG emissions would not be capable of a 20 MT CO2e/SP/year reduction to below the locally appropriate threshold.  Transportation: VMT would not reach reduction thresholds even with policy implementation.  Utilities: Disposal rate is expected to grow above allowable levels. No mitigation available since Kerman does not control County landfills.

The Project’s purpose is to subdivide existing land, presumably to facilitate future commercial development as anticipated by the General Plan. The Project does not propose development of structures and anticipated physical changes to the site would include minimal improvements. The Project complies the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code. The following further assesses the CEQA impacts areas identified in the three unavoidable impacts assessed in the EIR.  Greenhouse Gas (GHG): The SJVAPCD does not recommend assessing pollution associated with construction, as pollution-related construction will be temporary. Since there is no development proposed with the Project, no operational emissions are anticipated.  Transportation: Since no development is proposed with the Project, no VMT generation is anticipated.
 Utilities: Since no development is proposed with the Project, there is no waste generation anticipated.
39 Section 6, Item A.
01236.0405/833774.1
Overall, the Project impacts are within the envelope of impacts identified by the General Plan EIR, and there are no impacts peculiar to the project or parcel that were not covered by the General Plan EIR.

9. Conclusion
The City approved the 2024 City of Kerman General Plan, and prepared and certified an EIR for the same. This Project proposes the division of land into five parcels consistent with the General Plan, and there is no specific construction or subsequent use proposed for the same. The mere approval of the parcel map would not result in any new potentially significant on- or off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the General Plan EIR and environmental reviews, and no aspects peculiar to the Project or the parcels that would result in new effects. There is no new information of substantial importance that would result in significant effects not discussed in the previous document or substantially increase the severity of effects previously disclosed. Finally, while typically any feasible mitigation measures in the EIR would normally be undertaken and apply to the Project, in this particular case there are no such applicable mitigation measures required to be undertaken. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further analysis is required, and this Project is subject to an exemption pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and by CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. __________________________________
Signature
Jesus R. Orozco Community Development DIrector
__________________________________ ___________________________ Printed Name Title
40 Section 6, Item A.
41 Section 6, Item A.
42 Section 6, Item A.
43 Section 6, Item A.

TPM 2022-01
Shakti Land Development
Aerial View
*Not to scale
S.R. 180
S.

Vineland Ave.

Attachment 'D'
44 Section 6, Item A.

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 9, 2022
PRESENTER: Josefina Alvarez, Interim Finance Director
SUBJECT: User and Regulatory Fee Study Outcomes and Recommendations RECOMMENDATION: Council Consider the following:

1. Receive Report and Recommend Fee Increases and Provide feedback regarding presentation of study findings and initial recommendations.

2. Direct staff to schedule a public hearing to formally consider fee adjustments.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The last study to update the City’s Master Fee Schedule was conducted in 2008, and since 2013 the City of Kerman has not followed a comprehensive Allocated Business Cost (ABC) methodology.

The item provides findings and initial recommendations from the recently completed user and regulatory fee study. The study, commenced in FY 2021/22, with support from ClearSource Financial Consulting (ClearSource), provides an up-to-date analysis of the City’s current costs of providing feerelated services. This information can be used by the City Council as it considers potential updates to fees.

BACKGROUND
User and regulatory fees are set at the direction of the City Council at the conclusion of a public hearing to consider adoption of any new fees or fee increases.

The services for which a city imposes a user or regulatory fee typically derive from an individual person or entity’s action, request, or behavior. Therefore, except in cases where there is an overwhelming public benefit generated by a city’s involvement in the individual action, a fee for service ensures that the individual bears most, if not all, of the cost incurred by the City to provide that service. When a fee targets “100% or full cost recovery,” the individual is bearing the entirety of the cost. When a fee targets less than full cost recovery, another City revenue source – in most cases, the General Fund – subsidizes the individualized activity.

The proposed fees are intended to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws including providing confirmation that the proposed fees and charges are not a tax as defined in Article 13C of the California Constitution and that the proposed fees are no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the City’s activities and services addressed in the fees. Additionally, the manner in which the costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from the activities and services provided by the City.

Industry best practice and California statute are in harmony: User and regulatory fees should be set 45 Section 7, Item A.
according to the estimated reasonable cost of service and should bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from the activities and/or services provided by the City. Additionally, ongoing review and adjustment of fees provides multiple benefits, including:
• Increasing the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all residents and businesses, such as public safety services. • Keeping pace with general cost inflation.
• Avoiding fee spikes that are more likely to occur when municipalities leave fees unchanged for a multi-year period.
• Providing fee payers, city staff, and city policymakers with a pattern of consistency that provides information for forecasting and decision-making purposes. • Helps meet fee-payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.
• Encouraging generational equity among fee payers by avoiding long-term stagnation of fees followed by significant fee increases.

Fee Categories that Were Examined in this Study
This study specifically examined fee categories including, but not limited to:
• Administration and Finance Fees – Fees for licensing and administrative services. • Building Fees – Building plan review, permitting, and inspection for construction. • Code Enforcement Fees – Discrete activities to encourage compliance with the City’s Municipal Code.
• Land Development Engineering Fees – Engineering/land development plan review and inspection.
• Planning Fees – Development review/current planning, other community permitting, and miscellaneous labor.
• Police Fees – Specialized response, community permitting, public safety, and miscellaneous labor.
• Public Works Fees – Encroachments review, permitting and inspection, operations and infrastructure services, community permitting, and miscellaneous labor. • Recreation and Community Services Facility Rental Fees – Services include program participation and reserved facility use.

Items Not Examined in this Study
This study specifically excluded examination of the following:
• Development Impact Fees
• Taxes and Assessments
• Fines or Penalties
• Franchise Fees
46 Section 7, Item A.
• Utility Rates and Services Charges
These items are subject to different approval thresholds or are not subject to the same cost of service limitations as the fees examined as part of this study. Consequently, they are specifically excluded from the scope of this study.

Nearly every service for which a fee is imposed can be illustrated as follows, contrasting the components of the full cost of service, which is the maximum fee amount justified, against the local agency’s goals for cost recovery:

Based on the consultant’s experience working with municipalities throughout California, most feepaying stakeholders and city councilmembers accept high cost recovery targets for development-related fees as long as:
• The elements of the cost of service and assumptions are clearly communicated. • The city clearly communicates that only eligible costs are included in fees.

Primary Outcomes
During the course of study, information and analysis was generated and is discussed substantively throughout the attached User and Regulatory Fee Study Report its technical appendices. However, summarized in the following findings statements by broad fee category, are outcomes and proposals of particular interest to City policymakers.

Administration and Finance Fees
 Adjust Business License Application Review Fees, segregated into two primary categories:
o Businesses with Physical Location in City Limits including Home Occupations o Business Located Outside City Limits
 Minor Recalibration to Various Finance Fees (i.e., changes of $10 or less) 47 Section 7, Item A.
 Modify Business License Late Fee for Ease of Administration. Current Late Fee is Difficult to Administer and Escalates Rapidly:
o Current fee is: 10% late fee after 30 days, additional 5% added every 10 days after the license becomes delinquent
o Proposed fee is: 10% per month
Animal Licensing and Regulation Fees
 Adjust Dog License Fees and Remain Compliant with State Requirements for License fees for Non-Spayed / non-Neutered animals
 Scale impound fees to encourage responsible animal ownership. Example:
o First Impound: $25
o Second Impound: $50
o Third and Subsequent Impounds: $75
 Animal regulation will continue be a primarily tax-funded public safety service Building Fees
 Restructure fees to enhance correlation between services provided and fees collected  Established fixed fees for the City’s most commonly requested minor permits.  Fee schedule will allow applicants to easily estimate permit fees and works well for online permitting scenarios
 Proposed fees scale to reflect project magnitude and complexity  Full cost recovery is targeted for most fees. Less than full cost recovery targeted for minor residential permits:
o Residential HVAC Change-Out
o Residential Water Heater Change-Out
o Residential Re-Roof
Code Enforcement Fees
 Develop Fee Schedule that Allows the City to recover portion of Code Enforcement costs (Example Below)
o Inspection / Re-Inspection
 First Inspection – No Charge
 Second Inspection to Verify Violation Corrected – No Charge  Each Additional Inspection - $70
 Fees are intended to encourage property owner compliance with Municipal Code Land Development Engineering Fees
 Recalibrate fees and deposits to target full cost recovery of contract Engineer support for private development related review such as:
o Grading Plan Review
o Improvement Plan Review
 Streets
 Sidewalks
 Storm drain, etc.
48 Section 7, Item A.

Planning Fees
 Planning is a detailed process - projects may take a significant amount of resources over a multimonth and potentially multi-year timeframe, depending on project complexity and magnitude.  Current cost recovery for Planning services varies widely o Current fees result in very low cost recovery for some services (e.g., 10% cost recovery) o Current fees result in full cost recovery for some services (e.g., large environmental review targets 100% cost recovery)
 Fees are proposed to be adjusted to establish more consistent cost recovery o 25% Cost Recovery for Appeals
o 50% Cost Recovery for Minor Reviews, Administrative Projects o 75% Cost Recovery for More Complex Projects, Projects Requiring Planning Commission Review, Subdivision Review, etc.
o 100% Cost Recovery for Large Scale Projects and CEQA Reviews Police Fees
 Police Services are Almost Entirely Tax Funded
 Some fees are collected for discrete services provided. For these services the study recalibrates and proposes to establish fees to recover portion of cost of service.  Establish fees that allow for Recovery as needed for:
o Recurring False Alarm Response to Same Address
o Recurring Noise Disturbance to Same Address
o DUI-Related Collision Cost Recovery
o Special Requests for Police Services (e.g., outside event support) Public Works Fees
 Public Works Monitors Requests for Encroachment in the City Right-of-Way (e.g., utility work) o Current encroachment permit fee is $59
o Fee does not scale to well to reflect service provided  Restructure fees to enhance correlation between services provided and fees collected  Proposed fees scale to allow for lower fees for less complex projects and higher fees for more complex projects
Recreation and Facility Rental Fees
 Community Services and Recreation Departments throughout the State are facing significant challenges.
o Multi-year modification of services due to COVID-19
o Increases in labor, benefit, utility costs, services and supplies, and insurance related costs o Providing access to facilities and programs that are safe to use and align to community standards (health and safety).
o Minimum wage increases over the last several years = 25% increase since 2019  Fees are generally proposed to be adjusted by approximately 10%. Proposed change aligns to recent regional cost inflation
49 Section 7, Item A.

Fee Comparison Information
Similar fees are collected by communities throughout the region and the State. The proposed fee amounts do not exceed the City’s cost of service and are in-range of amounts charged by other jurisdictions.

FISCAL IMPACT
Additional revenues expected from the Proposed Master Fee Schedule are intended to offset the cost of providing existing services associated with those fee-related regulatory functions and other programs.

Additional fee revenue is not intended to fund new services.

Fairly allocating costs to the services provided and recovering some, or all, of these costs from service recipients creates value and predictability for City customers and reimburses the City for services provided to a single party, as compared to the public at large. Collecting fees for services:
 Increases the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all residents and businesses, such as public safety and public works services.  Helps meet fee-payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.

Attachments:

A. Draft Comprehensive Citywide User and Regulatory Fee Study B. Draft Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees
50 Section 7, Item A.

CITY OF KERMAN
DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A
51 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN

CONTENTS

REPORTING
1 TRANSMITTAL
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | Overall Findings
10 PROJECT ORIENTATION | Scope, Guidance, Methods

APPENDICES

A DRAFT OF PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW

B COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS

C SCHEDULE OF CURRENT FEES AND SAMPLE PROPOSED FEES
DRAFT
52 Section 7, Item A.

October 2022
Attn: Josefina Alvarez, Interim Finance Director
850 S. Madera Avenue
Kerman, California 93630
Dear Ms. Alvarez:

ClearSource Financial Consulting submits the following report describing the findings of our preparation of a User and Regulatory Fee Study for the City of Kerman.

Please refer to the Executive Summary for the key findings of the analysis and estimated impacts to City funds. The balance of the report and its appendices provide the necessary documentation to support those outcomes.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City on this topic. We are happy to continue discussion on this study as the need arises or consult with you on additional topics.

Sincerely,
DRAFT
53 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STUDY OVERVIEW
The City of Kerman has completed a User and Regulatory Fee Study. California cities regularly conduct these studies to justify fee amounts imposed and to optimize the overall portfolio of revenues available to the municipality to fund its services.

Industry practice and fiscal conditions in the state have led most cities to link cost recovery for services of individual action, cause, or benefit to that same individual through user fee revenue, relieving the agency’s general revenues as much as possible for use toward services of broader community benefit.

USER AND REGULATORY FEES
Cities derive annual revenue from a number of sources. These include, but are not limited to, property taxes, sales taxes, license fees, franchise fees, fines, rents, and user and regulatory fees. User and regulatory fees are intended to cover all, or a portion of, the costs incurred by the City for providing fee-related services and activities that are not otherwise provided to those not paying the fee.

California law provides guidance regarding the amounts the City may charge for fee-related services and activities. Specifically, in order to avoid being considered taxes, the fees charged shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services, activities, or materials for which fees are charged.

At its conclusion, this study proposes for City Council review and consideration at public hearing a new Schedule of User Fees and Charges for adoption and continued update in subsequent years.

COST RECOVERY POLICY AND PRACTICE
Recovering the costs of providing fee-related services directly influences the City’s fiscal health and increases the City’s ability to meet the service level expectations of fee payers.

The services for which the City imposes a user or regulatory fee typically derive from an individual person or entity’s action, request, or behavior. Therefore, except in cases where there is an overwhelming public benefit generated by the City’s involvement in the individual action, a fee for service ensures that the individual bears most, if not all, of the cost incurred by the City to provide that service. When a fee targets “100% or full cost recovery,” the individual is bearing the entirety of the cost. When a fee targets less than full cost recovery, another City revenue source – in most cases, the General Fund – subsidizes the individualized activity.

Generally, fees for service are targeted to full cost recovery, inclusive of operating, direct, indirect, and capital costs, except in cases where the City Council cites a public interest in lower fees. The City may also be influenced by market conditions, comparing to municipalities of similar size and service profile.

Exhibit 1 illustrates some common factors that may influence cost recovery decisions directed by City policymakers.

DRAFT
54 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXHIBIT 1 | ILLUSTRATION OF COST RECOVERY SCENARIOS

COST RECOVERY

THRESHOLD

CHARACTERISTIC OF THE SERVICE / ACTION
“NONE”
No Recovery of
the Costs of
Service
• Acute interest in protecting:
- Public safety
- Integrity of City infrastructure, assets, and operations - Vulnerable populations
• Collection of fees is not feasible or cost-effective
“LOW”
Up to 50% of the
Full Cost of
Service
• The broader public benefits greatly from the individual service provided • Larger fee amounts may discourage compliance with City requirements • Market sensitivities may negatively impact demand for services deemed important to the character of the community
• City policy directs an influence on fee amounts for:
- Concern for low-income participation
- Concern for specific sectors, such as owner-occupied residences or small business
- Priority for resident participation, versus non-resident “MODERATE”
Greater than
50% of the Full
Cost of Service
• While the individual benefits greatly from service provided, public benefit or public interest in compliance/participation is present
• Factors described in lower thresholds retain some influence • Though service benefits the individual to a high degree, fee levels should be sensitive to the encouragement of current City initiatives “FULL”
100% of the Full
Cost of Service
• Service benefits the individual to a great degree
• Service is highly regulatory
• Fee amounts do not materially impact compliance or demand • Fee amounts for comparable service are in line with other regional communities
“PENALTY”
Greater than Full
Cost
• Must be a fine/penalty for non-compliance with City code DRAFT
55 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FINDINGS AND PROPOSED ACTION
During the course of study, information and analysis was generated and is discussed substantively throughout this report and its technical appendices. However, summarized in the following findings statements by broad fee category, are outcomes and proposals of particular interest to City policymakers.  Administration and Finance Fees
- Adjust Business License Application Review Fees, segregated into two primary categories:
▪ Businesses with Physical Location in City Limits including Home Occupations ▪ Business Located Outside City Limits
- Minor Recalibration to Various Finance Fees (i.e., changes of $10 or less) - Modify Business License Late Fee for Ease of Administration. Current Late Fee is Difficult to Administer and Escalates Rapidly:
▪ Current fee is: 10% late fee after 30 days, additional 5% added every 10 days after the license becomes delinquent
▪ Proposed fee is: 10% per month
 Animal Licensing and Regulation Fees
- Adjust Dog License Fees and Remain Compliant with State Requirements for License fees for Non-Spayed / non-Neutered animals
- Scale impound fees to encourage responsible animal ownership. Example:
▪ First Impound: $25
▪ Second Impound: $50
▪ Third and Subsequent Impounds: $75
- Animal regulation will continue be a primarily tax-funded public safety service  Building Fees
- Restructure fees to enhance correlation between services provided and fees collected - Established fixed fees for the City’s most commonly requested minor permits. - Fee schedule will allow applicants to easily estimate permit fees and works well for online permitting scenarios
- Proposed fees scale to reflect project magnitude and complexity - Full cost recovery is targeted for most fees. Less than full cost recovery targeted for minor residential permits:
▪ Residential HVAC Change-Out
▪ Residential Water Heater Change-Out
▪ Residential Re-Roof
DRAFT
56 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 Code Enforcement Fees
- Develop Fee Schedule that Allows the City to recover portion of Code Enforcement costs (Example Below)
▪ Inspection / Re-Inspection
• First Inspection – No Charge
• Second Inspection to Verify Violation Corrected – No Charge • Each Additional Inspection - $70
- Fees are intended to encourage property owner compliance with Municipal Code  Land Development Engineering Fees
- Recalibrate fees and deposits to target full cost recovery of contract Engineer support for private development related review such as:
▪ Grading Plan Review
▪ Improvement Plan Review
• Streets
• Sidewalks
• Storm drain, etc.
 Planning Fees
- Planning is a detailed process - projects may take a significant amount of resources over a multi-month and potentially multi-year timeframe, depending on project complexity and magnitude.
- Current cost recovery for Planning services varies widely ▪ Current fees result in very low cost recovery for some services (e.g., 10% cost recovery)
▪ Current fees result in full cost recovery for some services (e.g., large environmental review targets 100% cost recovery)
- Fees are proposed to be adjusted to establish more consistent cost recovery ▪ 25% Cost Recovery for Appeals
▪ 50% Cost Recovery for Minor Reviews, Administrative Projects ▪ 75% Cost Recovery for More Complex Projects, Projects Requiring Planning Commission Review, Subdivision Review, etc.
▪ 100% Cost Recovery for Large Scale Projects and CEQA Reviews DRAFT
57 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 Police Fees
- Police Services are Almost Entirely Tax Funded
- Some fees are collected for discrete services provided. For these services the study recalibrates and proposes to establish fees to recover portion of cost of service. - Establish fees that allow for Recovery as needed for:
▪ Recurring False Alarm Response to Same Address
▪ Recurring Noise Disturbance to Same Address
▪ DUI-Related Collision Cost Recovery
▪ Special Requests for Police Services (e.g., outside event support)  Public Works Fees
- Public Works Monitors Requests for Encroachment in the City Right-of-Way (e.g., utility work)
▪ Current encroachment permit fee is $59
▪ Fee does not scale to well to reflect service provided - Restructure fees to enhance correlation between services provided and fees collected - Proposed fees scale to allow for lower fees for less complex projects and higher fees for more complex projects
 Recreation and Facility Rental Fees
- Community Services and Recreation Departments throughout the State are facing significant challenges.
▪ Multi-year modification of services due to COVID-19
▪ Increases in labor, benefit, utility costs, services and supplies, and insurance related costs
▪ Providing access to facilities and programs that are safe to use and align to community standards (health and safety).
▪ Minimum wage increases over the last several years = 25% increase since 2019 - Fees are generally proposed to be adjusted by approximately 10%. Proposed change aligns to recent regional cost inflation
Fee Comparison Information
Similar fees are collected by communities throughout the region and the State. The proposed fee amounts do not exceed the City’s cost of service and are in-range of amounts charged by other jurisdictions.

DRAFT
58 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 9

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Additional revenues expected from the Proposed Master Fee Schedule are intended to offset the cost of providing existing services associated with those fee-related regulatory functions and other programs. Additional fee revenue is not intended to fund new services.

Fairly allocating costs to the services provided and recovering some, or all, of these costs from service recipients creates value and predictability for City customers and reimburses the City for services provided to a single party, as compared to the public at large. Collecting fees for services:
 Increases the availability of General Fund revenues to be used for services and activities available to all residents and businesses, such as public safety and public works services.  Helps meet fee-payer service level expectations by collecting fees to fund the existing level of services provided.

Please continue to the following technical report and appendices for further discussion of this Comprehensive User Fee Study.

DRAFT
59 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 10

PROJECT ORIENTATION

SCOPE OF STUDY
The City of Kerman has completed a User and Regulatory Fee Study, which represents an external review of prevailing practices and development of a new Schedule of User Fees and Charges. ClearSource Financial Consulting has prepared this analysis during Fiscal Years 2021/22 and 2022/23 and will be available to answer questions as the City proceeds in implementing findings as it chooses.

Key tasks expected by the City from this study included the following:
 Review eligible fee-related services citywide to establish the reasonable relationship between current fees for service and the underlying costs of service.
 Calculate the full cost of service, including estimated citywide overhead costs.  Recommend fees to be charged for each service.
 Recommend cost recovery strategies and best practices in setting fees, while considering the complexities and demands of responsible programs or departments.  Identify underlying billable rates for cost recovery opportunities and as the basis for user fees.  Maintain a thoroughly documented analysis to ensure compliance with Proposition 26, and other statutes, as applicable.

DIRECT SERVICES UNDER REVIEW
Fee Categories
City fees under review in this project focused on direct services eligible for user fee methodology, aslisted in the City’s published fee schedules. Additionally, the project was tasked with identifying any relevant additions for services performed without a fee or for under-quantified or ineffectively structured fees.

Current services shown in the City’s various prevailing fee schedules and addressed in this study are summarized as follows:
 Administration and Finance – Records management, licensing, and billing activities.  Building – Building plan review, permitting, and inspection for construction and sub-trades.  Code Enforcement – Discrete activities to encourage compliance with the City’s Municipal Code.  Land Development Engineering – Services include engineering/land development plan review and inspection.
 Planning – Services include development review/current planning, other community permitting, and miscellaneous labor.

DRAFT
60 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 11

PROJECT ORIENTATION
 Police – Services include specialized response, community permitting, public safety, and miscellaneous labor.
 Public Works – Encroachments review, permitting and inspection, operations and infrastructure services, community permitting, and miscellaneous labor.  Recreation and Community Services Facility Rental Fees – Services include program participation and reserved facility use.

REASON FOR STUDY
Cities derive annual revenue from a number of sources. These include, but are not limited to, property taxes, sales taxes, franchise fees, fines, rents, and user and regulatory fees. User and regulatory fees are intended to cover all, or a portion of, the costs incurred by a city for providing fee-related services and activities that are not otherwise provided to those not paying the fee.

California cities regularly conduct fee studies to justify fee amounts imposed and to optimize the overall body of revenues available to the municipality to fund its services. Widespread industry practice and fiscal conditions in the state have led most cities to link cost recovery for services of individual action, cause, or benefit to that individual through user fee revenue, relieving the agency’s general revenues for services of broader community benefit.

PREVAILING GUIDANCE
The objectives of this study, the methodology used to complete the study, and the formulation of outcomes and recommendations for future consideration were significantly influenced by Article 13C of the California Constitution and Section 66014 of the California Government Code.

Article 13C states that the local government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payer bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity. Additionally, Article 13C identifies the following as items that are not defined as taxes:
 A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.  A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payer that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product.

DRAFT
61 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 12

PROJECT ORIENTATION
 A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.  A charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local government property.
 A fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government, as a result of a violation of law.
 A charge imposed as a condition of property development.  Assessments and property-related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of Article XIII D.

Section 66014(a) of the California Government Code includes the following, “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local agency charges fees for zoning variances; zoning changes; use permits; building inspections; building permits; …the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act…; or planning services…; those fees may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services or materials is submitted to, and approved by, a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting on the issue.

The outcomes and recommendations of the study are intended to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws including providing confirmation that the proposed fees (“charges”) recommended as a result of this study are not taxes as defined in Article 13C of the California Constitution and that the proposed fees are no more than necessary to the cover the reasonable costs of the City’s activities and services addressed in the fees. Additionally, this report is intended to show that the manner in which the costs are allocated to a payer bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payer’s burdens on, or benefits received from the activities and services provided by the City.

METHODOLOGY AND DATA SOURCES
This study calculated the estimated reasonable cost of providing various fee-related services across the City organization. Generally, the estimated reasonable cost of providing the fee-related services and activities examined in this study can be calculated as the product of the composite fully-burdened hourly labor rate of the division responsible for providing services and the estimated labor time required to process a typical request for service.

The composite fully-burdened hourly rates calculated in this study are based on the estimated annual hours spent providing fee related services, and estimated labor, services and supplies, and citywide overhead expenditures, sourced as follows:
 Estimated annual hours spent providing fee related services were developed based on interviews with City staff and are in-line with typical direct service ratios experienced by the consultant via studies of similar municipalities throughout California.

DRAFT
62 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 13

PROJECT ORIENTATION
 Labor expenditures for in-house personnel were based on budgeted salary and benefits expenditures.  Contract service personnel and other services and supplies related costs were based on Fiscal Year 2022/23 adopted budgets.
 Citywide overhead cost allocations were developed to assign a reasonable share of central service support to the City’s direct service units.
 Estimated labor times were developed based on responses from the staff primarily responsible for the provision of services examined in the study. Commonly used industry data also aided in the development of time estimates and proposed fee structures.

Once cost of service levels are identified, the City may use this information to inform targeted cost recovery from fees. Fees set at the cost of service target full cost recovery. Fees set at any amount less than the cost of service target less than full cost recovery.

An illustration of the methods used in this analysis is shown in Exhibit 2.

DRAFT
63 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 14

PROJECT ORIENTATION
EXHIBIT 2 | STEPS IN ANALYZING COSTS OF SERVICE AND USER FEES DRAFT
64 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN 15

PROJECT ORIENTATION

CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
If the City decides to adopt or otherwise utilize outcomes generated through this study, it should:
 Update Systems for Fee Outcomes – Ensure that City staff begin using updated fees and associated outcomes once the updated schedule of fees becomes effective. Values should be included in all official fee schedules used throughout the City (e.g., departmental pamphlets, counter schedules, and online information). Additionally, ensure collections processes are updated, which may include coding in billing systems and training for personnel who handle fees directly with the public.  Actively Monitor the Use of Fees – In order to recover accurate and eligible amounts expected, the City should be diligent about tracking time to projectsfor time and materials billings and ensuring fees are applied in the correct amount and using the correct and intended basis for fixed fee billings.  Monitor Feedback and Permit Statistics – Monitor permit and application volume and applicant feedback to determine if fee modifications are resulting in any unanticipated changes in project frequency and to increase the level of detail available for revenue forecasting.  Annually Review and Adjust Fee Values – In order to generally maintain pace with regional cost inflation and/or the City’s salary cost inflation, the City should adjust its fees on an annual basis. A commonly used, reasonable inflation index is the annual change in the all-urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) representative of the region.
 Periodically Perform Comprehensive Analysis – A comprehensive fee study should be conducted periodically (e.g., every three to five years) to ensure fee levels remain at or below legal limits and are consistent with evolving service practices and local conditions.

DRAFT
65 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN

APPENDIX A

DRAFT OF PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE FOR CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
DRAFT
66 Section 7, Item A.

Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees
DRAFT
67 Section 7, Item A.

FEE SCHEDULE PAGE
Administrative Fees - City Clerk and Document Reproduction Fees 1 Administrative Fees - Finance Fees and Business License Tax 2 Animal Licensing and Regulation Fees 5
Building Fees 6
Code Enforcement Fees 14
Engineering - Grading Plan Review Fees 15
Engineering - Improvement Plan Review Fees 16
Planning Fees 17
Police Fees 20
Public Works - Encroachment Permit Fees 22
Public Works - Water Miscellaneous Services Fees 24
Public Works - Materials and CleanUp / Repair Fees 26
Recreation / Community Services - Program Fees 27
Recreation / Community Services - Parks and Facility Rental Rates and Charges 28 Recreation / Community Services - Kerman Community Center Rental Rates and Charges 29 and punitive fines and penalties.

Table of Contents
Note: This Fee Schedule does not include all fees, rates, or charges that may be imposed by the City.

Examples of excluded items include, but are not limited to,development impact fees, utility rates, DRAFT
68 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

ADMINISTRATIVE FEES -CITY CLERK AND DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION FEES Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Hardcopy Records Request
a) Black and White Copy - up to 8.5 x 14 $0.10 per single sided page b) Black and White Copy - 11 x 17 $0.15 per single sided page c) Color Copy - up to 8.5 x 14 $0.20 per single sided page d) Color Copy - 11 x 17 $0.25 per single sided page
e) Oversized Sheets (Plans/Maps) $3.00 per single sided page 2 Digital Media - Copies on City Supplied Device $10 per device 3 Outside Printing / Preparation Services Actual Cost
4 Postage Actual Cost
5 Fax Fee $1 per page
6 Candidate Nomination Filing Fee $25
7 Requests Requiring Special Programming or Formatting Actual hourly rate plus cost of digital devices
[a]
Description
[a] This fee applies to the creation of a new document or information not normally prepared, owned, used or retained by the City as part of the conduct of the Public's business. Fee also includes cost of any digital devices used to provide requested information.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 1
69 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

ADMINISTRATIVE FEES - FINANCE FEES AND BUSINESS LICENSE TAX Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Business License Application Review Fee
a) Physical Location within City Limits (Including Home Occupation) $150 Each b) Business Located Outside City Limits and Contractors without Physical Location within City Limits
$75 Each
2 Returned Check Fee; ACH/EFT Return/Error $25 Each
3 Charitable Solicitation Car Wash Permit Fee $20 Each [a] 4 Utility Proof of Residency / Credit Reference Letter $10 Each 5 Utility Billing Account History Report $10 Each
6 Fireworks Permit $50 Per permit
7 Yard Sale Permit Fee $10 Per permit
[a] Fee is refundable with documentation of approved costs.

Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 2
70 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

ADMINISTRATIVE FEES - FINANCE FEES AND BUSINESS LICENSE TAX Fee / Tax Charge Basis Note
Business License Tax General
1 Business License Tax
a) Sole Proprietorship with No Employees $63.32
b) 1-5 Employees $94.21
c) 6-10 Employees $126.64
d) 11 or More Employee $157.53
Business License Tax Specific
2 A - Public Dance
a) without drinks or alcohol $23.17 per day
b) with drinks or alcohol $30.89 per day
3 B - Real Estate Broker $149.81 per year
4 C - Card Tables, Card games, Cardroom
a) Business Permit $789.19 per year
b) Employee
i) Initial Year $308.88 per year
ii) Renewal $77.22 per year
5 D - Auction Sales $631.66 per year
6 E - Astrologer / Fortune Teller / Spiritualist / Hypnotist $78.76 per day 7 F - Circus
a) Acrobatic Performance $63.32 per day
b) Jugglers / Magician / Rope Dancing $15.44 per show, per day 8 G - Carnival Rides / Games / Food & Beverage Stands (Harvest Festival) $157.53 per day 9 H - Special Event Permit without Full Time License $6.18 per day 10 I - Trained Animals $35.52 per day
11 J - Tent or Other Shows, Minstrels, Operatic or Concert Singers $126.64 per day 12 K - Merry go Round / Horses Ride $23.17 per day
13 L - Bankruptcy Stock $1,261.77 per year
14 M - Retail or Wholesale by Phone $63.32 per year
15 N - Itinerant Peddler, Solicitors and Photographers $163.00 per quarter 16 Mobile Food Vendors $163.00 per quarter
17 Apartments, Rental Housing, Multi-Family Housing, Mobile Home Parks - Four Units or More
$7.00 per unit, per year
Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 3
71 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

ADMINISTRATIVE FEES - FINANCE FEES AND BUSINESS LICENSE TAX Description Fee / Tax Charge Basis Note
Other
18 State of California Fee (SB 1186) $4.00 per license [a] 19 Late Fee (% of license amount) 10% per month
[a] Amount established by State of California. In the case of discrepancies, State amount shall supersede this schedule.

Note: See City of Kerman Municipal Code for detailed description of license categories. License fees idenified in Sections A through M above shall, for each year after 1996, be increased by multiplying .8 times the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") for Los Angeles Urban Wage Earners and Clerical as determined on June 1st of the year just ended times the license fee for the year just ended.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 4
72 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

ANIMAL LICENSING AND REGULATION FEES
Fee Note
Dog License Fees
1 Spayed or Neutered Dog
a) One Year Option $15
b) Two Year Option $20
c) Three Year Option $30
2 Nonspayed or Unneutered Dog
a) One Year Option $30
b) Two Year Option $40
c) Three Year Option $60
3 Delinquent Penalty $25
4 Lost Tag Replacement $5
5 Service Dog License $0
Impound Fees
6 Licensed Animal
a) First Impound $25
b) Second Impound $50
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $75
7 Unlicensed Animal
a) First Impound $50
b) Second Impound $100
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $150
8 Dangerous Animals
a) First Impound $100
b) Second Impound $200
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $300
9 Impound Fine for Nonspayed or Unneutered Animal
a) First Impound $35 [a]
b) Second Impound $50 [a]
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $100 [a]
10 Care and Feeding Per Day
a) Up to 100 lbs $15
b) Over 100 lbs $25
Owner Surrender Animals (Living or Dead)
11 Delivered to Shelter $25
12 Picked Up by Animal Control $50
[a] Food and Agriculture Code Sections 30804.7 and 31751.7. These amounts are in addition to impound fees.

Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 5
73 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Fee Note
1 HVAC Change-Out - Residential $80
2 Water Heater Change-Out - Residential $60
3 Re-Roof - Residential $120
4 Line Repair - Sewer / Water / Gas $122
5 Service Panel Upgrade - Residential $163
6 Electric Vehicle Charger - Residential $163
7 Battery Backup Storage - Residential $163
8 Generator - Residential $163
9 Residential Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit
a) 15kW or less $285 [a]
b) Above 15kW $450 base fee, plus $15 per kW for each
kW above 15kW
[a]
10 Commercial Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit
a) 50kW or less $1,000 [a]
b) 50kW – 250kW $1,000 base fee, plus $7 per kW for each kW above 50kW up to 250kW
[a]
c) Above 250kW $2,400 base fee, plus $5 per kW for each kW above 250 kW
[a]
11 Ground-Mount Solar - Residential
a) 15kW or less $450 [a]
b) Above 15kW $450 base fee, plus $15 per kW for each
kW above 15kW
[a]
12 Demolition - Residential Single Family $163
13 Demolition - Commercial $326
14 Temporary Power Pole $122
15 Swimming Pool/Spa - Residential $571
16 Swimming Pool/Spa Equipment Change-out Only - Residential $163 17 Swimming Pool Replaster - Residential $163
18 Voluntary Seismic Retrofit - Residential $245
A. Fees for Commonly Requested and Minor Miscellaneous Building Permit Types. Fees shown in this section (Section A.) include all applicable inspection, and plan review fees. Additional permit processing fees apply. Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies.

Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 6
74 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Fee Note
A. Fees for Commonly Requested and Minor Miscellaneous Building Permit Types. Fees shown in this section (Section A.) include all applicable inspection, and plan review fees. Additional permit processing fees apply. Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies.

Description
19 Retaining Wall
a) Wall Under 4' in Height from Bottom of Footing $326
b) Wall Over 4' in Height from Bottom of Footing
i) Up to 100 LF $652
ii) Each Additional 100 LF $41
20 CMU Wall
a) Wall Under 6' in height $326
b) Wall Over 6' in height
i) Up to 100 LF $652
ii) Each Additional 100 LF $41
21 Window / Sliding Glass Door - Retrofit / Repair / Replacement a) Up to 5 $163
b) Over 5 See Permit Fee Table
[a] Total fees shall not exceed amounts outlined in California Government Code 66015(a)(1).

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 7
75 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Total Valuation Permit Fee
$1 to $2,000 $163.00
$2,001 to $25,000 $163.00 for the first $2,000 plus $21.26 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
$25,001 to $50,000 $652.00 for the first $25,000 plus $13.04 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000
$50,001 to $100,000 $978.00 for the first $50,000 plus $19.56 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000
$100,001 to $500,000 $1,956.00 for the first $100,000 plus $6.52 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000
$500,001 to $1,000,000 $4,564.00 for the first $500,000 plus $5.22 for each add'l $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000
$1,000,001 and up $7,172.00 for the first $1,000,000 plus $3.65 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $1,000,000
For permits for new construction, additions, tenant improvements or residential remodels requiring plumbing, electric, or mechanical review, the following percentages shall be added to the base permit fee Mechanical inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
Determination of Valuation for Fee-Setting Purposes
● Project valuations for new construction shall be based on building valuation as printed and published by the International Code Council as of February of the most recent publishing, including adjustment for RS Means location factor. ● Project valuations for general construction such as tenant improvements, and remodels shall be based on the total value of all construction work, including all finish work, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. If, in the opinion of the Building Official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the Building Official. ● Final building permit valuation shall be set by the Building Official. The final building permit valuation shall be set at an amount that allows the City to recover its costs of applicant plan check, permit and inspection activities.

Note: For construction projects with permit fees calculated using Sections B, C, D, or E, additional fees apply for permit issuance. Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies (e.g. State of California). Additional fees apply for plan review, when applicable.

B. Permit Fee for New Buildings, Additions, Tenant Improvements, Residential Remodels, and Combined Mechanical, Electrical, and/or Plumbing Permits
Plumbing inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
Electrical inspection fees = Base permit fee x .10
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 8
76 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Total Valuation Permit Fee
Up to $2,000 $163.00
$2,001 to $4,000 $163.00
$4,001 to $10,000 $244.50 for the first $4,000 plus $13.59 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
$10,000 and up $326.00 for the first $10,000 plus $5.43 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Total Valuation Permit Fee
Up to $2,000 $163.00
$2,001 to $4,000 $163.00
$4,001 to $10,000 $244.50 for the first $4,000 plus $13.59 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
$10,000 and up $326.00 for the first $10,000 plus $5.43 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
Total Valuation Permit Fee
Up to $2,000 $163.00
$2,001 to $4,000 $163.00
$4,001 to $10,000 $244.50 for the first $4,000 plus $13.59 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $4,000
$10,000 and up $326.00 for the first $10,000 plus $5.43 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000
C. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Mechanical Permit
D. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Plumbing Permit
E. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Electrical Permit
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 9
77 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Stand-Alone or Combination Permit Fees (Alternative Calculation) a) One Inspection Required $82 per permit
b) Two Inspections Required $163 per permit
c) Three Inspections Required $245 per permit
d) Four Inspections Required $326 per permit
e) Each Additional Inspection $82 per permit
Note: For construction projects with permit fees calculated using Section F, additional fees apply for permit issuance. Additional fees may apply for services provided by other City Departments (e.g. Planning Review), Technology Enhancement Fees, and Fees Collected on Behalf of Other Agencies (e.g. State of California). Additional fees apply for plan review, when applicable.

Description
F. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone or Combination Permits Not Identified Elsewhere in this Schedule DRAFT Appendix A: p. 10
78 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Fee Note
1 Building Plan Check Fees - Building
a) Plan Review Fee, if applicable 75% [a]
b) Expedited Plan Check (per hour, 2-hour minimum) $196 c) Revision Application Fee (per hour) (1-hour minimum) $163 d) Production Units / Lot Specific Units 20% of standard plan check fee [b] e) Alternate Methods and Materials Review (per hour) $163 f) Excess Plan Review Fee (3rd and subsequent) (per hour) $163 h) Deferred Plan Submittals (per hour, 2-hour minimum) $163 2 Building Plan Check Fees - Planning
(Fees Only Applied to Projects Requiring Review)
a) Alterations/Additions - Residential $95
b) New Construction - Single Family Residential $189
c) New Construction - 2-4 Residential Units $189
d) New Construction - 5+ Residential Units $378
e) New Construction - Non-Residential $378
f) Alterations/Additions - Non-Residential $95
[a] Includes initial plan check, plus two back checks. The City will bill hourly for additional plan review required.

G. Building Plan Review Fees
Description
When applicable, plan check fees shall be paid at the time of application for a building permit.

The plan checking fee is in addition to the building permit fee [b] For identical buildings built by the same builder on the same lot or in the same tract and for which building permits are issued at the same time. Note: Flop plans are not considered identical plans.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 11
79 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Fee Note
1 Permit Processing Fee $68
4 Strong Motion Instrumentation (SMI) Fee Calculation
a) Residential $0.50 or valuation x .00013
b) Commercial $0.50 or valuation x .00028
5 Building Standards (SB 1473) Fee Calculation (Valuation) a) $1 - $25,000 $1
b) $25,001 - $50,000 $2
c) $50,001 - $75,000 $3
d) $75,001 - $100,000 $4
e) Each Add'l $25,000 or fraction thereof Add $1
6 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (per 30 Days) $245 7 Permit Extension $163
8 Permit Reactivation Fee
a) Reactivation Fee if All Inspections Have Been Performed and Approved Up to But Not Including Final Inspection
$163
b) Reactivation Fee - All Other Scenarios
i) Permit Expired Up to One Year 50% of Original Base
Building Permit Fee
ii) Permit Expired More than One Year 100% of Original Base Building Permit Fee
9 Permit Reissuance Fee $82
10 Damaged Building Survey (Fire, Flood, Vehicle Damage, Etc.) $245 11 AB 838 Violation Fees
a) Investigation resulting in Violations under AB 838 (per hour) (1-hour minimum) $163 b) Inspection Report Production for Violations under AB 838 (per hour) (1-hour minimum) $163 Other Fees
12 Phased Inspection Fee (per inspection) $82
13 After Hours Inspection (per hour) (2-hour minimum) $196 14 Re-inspection Fee (as determined by City Building Official) (each) $82 [b] 15 Duplicate Copy of Permit $54
16 Duplicate Copy of Certificate of Occupancy $27
17 Construction and Demolition Waste Management Review Fee $163 18 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule (per 1/2 hour) $82 H. Other Fees
Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 12
80 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BUILDING FEES
Fee Note
H. Other Fees
Description
Violation Fees
19 Investigation Fee For Work Done Without Permits
(In addition to applicable permit fees)
equal to
permit fee
[b] Reinspection fee applies after the first re-inspection.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 13
81 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

CODE ENFORCEMENT FEES
Fee Note
1 Inspection / Re-Inspection
a) First Inspection No Charge
b) Second Inspection to Verify Violation Corrected No Charge c) Each Additional Inspection $70
2 Abatement Warrant $250
3 Serving Notice $70
4 Lien Approval Fee $150
5 Special Assessment Approval Fee $150
6 Lien Release Fee $50
7 Abandoned Property Registration & Monitoring Fee
a) Registration Fee
i) Initial $70
ii) Renewal $70
b) Monitoring Fee (per year)
i) Initial $140
ii) Renewal $140
8 Rates for Services Not Listed Above
a) Code Enforcement Personnel (per hour) $146
b) Specialized Services Including, but not limited to, Attorney and Abatement Services Actual Cost Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 14
82 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
ENGINEERING - GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES *
Initial Deposit
or Minimum Fee Unit Note

PLAN REVIEW FEES
1 Grading Plan Check
a) Parcels under 1 acre over 50 CY $1,552 deposit [a]
b) 1.00 - 5.00 acres
i) First acre $1,552 deposit [a]
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof up to 5 acres $194 deposit [a] c) 5.01 - 10.00 acres
i) First 5.01 acres $2,328 deposit [a]
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof up to 10 acres $194 deposit [a] d) Over 10 acres
i) First 10.01 acres $3,298 deposit [a]
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof $146 deposit [a] 2 Permit Issuance - Onsite Construction / Grading $97 fee 3 Extension of Time $97 fee
4 Fee for Additional Services Required Due to Changes, Modifications, Additions, etc.

Actual Costs / T&M plus
15% admin fee
fee
5 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff $194 per hour
b) Contract Service Providers Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 15% admin fee
[a] Amount shown is initial deposit.

Funds expended for staff time shall not be dependent upon the City’s approval or disapproval of the application request. Any deposit amounts remaining after final project close out will be returned to applicant (less bond amounts held by the City).

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

Description
* See Planning and Engineering Fees for Tract, Street, and Other Fees Full Cost Deposits and Deposit Replenishment
Applicants for full cost (deposit-based) submittals shall pay for all City staff and contract service provider time and materials required to process the application. A full cost reimbursement agreement shall be included with the project application submittal package. Projects outside the scope of this fee schedule will be subject to a full cost reimbursement agreement to be approved by the City Manager and/or City Council. This reimbursement agreement will include the identification of a work program and will include cost estimates for both City staff time and consultant services based on a defined scope of work.

Full Cost Deposits and Deposit Replenishment
Initial deposits will be collected and held by the City in a deposit account at the time the application is submitted. Project billing amounts will be drawn from the deposit account. A positive account balance shall be maintained at all times during the review process. No work will be performed on a project with a negative fund balance. If the deposit is reduced to below 20% of the initial deposit amount, the applicant will be notified and required to supplement the deposit account with an additional amount no less than 50% of the original deposit.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 15
83 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

ENGINEERING - IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW FEES
Fee Unit Note
1 Subdivision Map Engineering Plan Check & Inspection
Cost of Improvements
a) First $50,000 10.00% % of Engineer's Cost Estimate [a] b) $50,001 to $300,000 6.00% % of Engineer's Cost Estimate [a] c) $300,001 to $700,000 4.00% % of Engineer's Cost Estimate [a] d) Greater than $700,000 2.50% % of Engineer's Cost Estimate [a] 2 Fee for Additional Services Required Due to Changes,
Modifications, Additions, etc.

Actual Costs / T&M plus
15% admin fee
3 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff $194 per hour
b) Contract Service Providers Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 15% admin fee
As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

Description
[a] Estimate of 25% of fee due at initial submittal. Amount shown is intended to serve as a reasonable estimate, however the City reserves the right to collect additional fees for work outside of typical scope. Fees are additive (e.g., For $75,000 of improvements the fee is calculated as follows: For the first $50,000 of improvements fee is 10% of engineer's cost estimate. For the next $25,000 of improvements the fee is 6% of engineer's cost estimate).

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 16
84 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PLANNING FEES
Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Charge Basis Note
Appeal
1 Appeal
a) Applicant Requested $1,000 Per Appeal
b) Non-Applicant Requested $2,850 Per Appeal
Annexation
2 Annexation $10,000 $10,000 Deposit with Minimum Fee [a] Use Permit
3 Administrative Use Permit $1,890 Fixed Fee [b]
4 Conditional Use Permit
a) CUP - Minor - No New Construction $2,835 Fixed Fee [b] b) CUP - Major - New Construction $5,670 Fixed Fee [b]
c) CUP - Alcohol with PCN Consideration Base CUP fee plus 25% Fixed Fee [b] d) CUP - Amendment 50% of current equivalent fee Fixed Fee [b] e) CUP - Extension $425 Fixed Fee [b]
5 Temporary Use Permit
a) Temporary Use Permit (First Time Applicant) $319 Fixed Fee [b] b) Temporary Use Permit (Reccurring Annual Event) $142 Fixed Fee [b] Environmental
6 Categorical Exemption Review $189 Fixed Fee
7 Recordation of Notice of Determination $189 Fixed Fee 8 Negative Declaration pass-through actual costs plus
15% city admin fee
$10,000 T&M with initial deposit
9 Mitigated Negative Declaration pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 T&M with initial deposit
10 Environmental Impact Report pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 T&M with initial deposit
General Plan Amendment / Specific Plan
11 General Plan Amendment $7,500 $7,500 Deposit with Minimum Fee 12 Specific Plan
a) Specific Plan pass-through actual costs plus
15% city admin fee
$10,000 T&M with initial deposit
b) Specific Plan Amendment pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$5,000 T&M with initial deposit
Site Plan
13 Site Plan Review
a) Non-Residential
i) Less than 1,200 sq. ft. (New Construction or Site Modification) $1,890 Fixed Fee [b] ii) +1,201 sq. ft. - 15,000 sq. ft. (Minor Construction) $7,088 Fixed Fee [b] iii) +15,001 sq. ft. (Major Construction) $11,340 Fixed Fee [b] b) Residential
i) 1-4 Multi-Family Units $1,890 Fixed Fee [b]
ii) 5-40 Multi-Family Units $7,088 Fixed Fee [b]
iii) +41 Multi-Family Units $11,340 Fixed Fee [b]
c) Site Plan Review - Amendment 50% of current equivalent fee [b] d) Site Plan Review - Extension $425 Fixed Fee [b]
Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 17
85 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PLANNING FEES
Fixed Fee
Description or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Charge Basis Note Subdivisions
14 Lot Line Adjustment $1,134 Fixed Fee
15 Parcel Merger $1,134 Fixed Fee
16 Parcel Map Waiver $1,134 Fixed Fee
17 Certificate of Correction / Certificate of Compliance $567 Fixed Fee 18 Tentative Parcel Map (4 lots or less) $2,268 Fixed Fee 19 Tentative Parcel Map - Amendment $756 Fixed Fee
20 Tentative Parcel Map - Extension $425 Fixed Fee
21 Tentative Subdivision Map (5 lots or more)
a) 100 Lots or Less $5,670 Fixed Fee
b) More than 100 Lots
i) Base Fee for the first 100 Lots $5,670 Fixed Fee
ii) Per Lot Fee for each additional lot $24 Fixed Fee
22 Tentative Subdivision Map - Amendment $2,268 Fixed Fee 23 Tentative Subdivision Map - Extension $425 Fixed Fee 24 Final Parcel Map (4 lots or less) $1,134 Fixed Fee
25 Final Subdivision / Tract Map (5 lots or more)
a) 100 Lots or Less $2,835 Fixed Fee
b) More than 100 Lots
i) Base Fee for the first 100 Lots $2,835 Fixed Fee
ii) Per Lot Fee for each additional lot $12 Fixed Fee
26 Planned /Smart Zone Development Plan Review $4,725 Fixed Fee 27 Developer Agreement Preparation $7,500 $7,500 Deposit with Minimum Fee Zoning
28 Rezone/Prezone $7,500 $7,500 Deposit with Minimum Fee 29 Ordinance Text Amendment $5,000 $5,000 Deposit with Minimum Fee 30 Variance Review $2,835 Fixed Fee
31 Minor Deviation $333 Fixed Fee
32 Density Bonus $2,835 Fixed Fee
33 Classification of Use $1,512 Fixed Fee
34 Zoning Clearance Letter
a) Basic Property Information $95 Fixed Fee
b) Basic Property Information with Additional Research Required $375 Fixed Fee Signs
35 Temporary Sign Permit No Charge Fixed Fee
36 Tenant Specific Sign Permit $331 Fixed Fee
37 Master Sign Program $1,418 Fixed Fee
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 18
86 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PLANNING FEES
Fixed Fee
Description or Minimum Fee Initial Deposit Charge Basis Note Miscellaneous
38 Address Adjustment $284 Fixed Fee
39 ADU / JADU Plan Review $151 Fixed Fee
40 Removal of Deed Restriction on Real Property $189 Fixed Fee 41 Fire Plan Review determined by Fire District /
CIty MOU and/or Fire District
Fee Schedule
Rate for Services Not Listed Above
42 Rate for Services Not Listed Above
a) Planning $189 Per Hour
b) Contract Environmental Review, Planning, Peer Review, etc. pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
c) Specialized Attorney Review pass-through actual costs d) Outside Agency Costs (e.g. Fire, other Governments) pass-through actual costs [a] Amount shown is City fee only. Additional fees may apply for LAFCO, Department of Fish & Wildlife, County, etc..

Use of Full Cost Recovery with Minimum Amount Due
For fees collected using Full Cost Recovery with Minimum Amount Due, the City will provide an accounting of internal costs and other related costs (e.g. consultant, County, attorney, etc.), to support any amounts billed in excess of the minimum amount due.

Note: In addition to amounts shown above, applicant is responsible for any amounts due to outside agencies (e.g., LAFCO, Department of Fish & Wildlife, County).

Overview of Fee Structure
Fees may be either fixed fees, or deposits with a minimum fee amount due. When a fee is deposit-based, the City will collect the initial deposit and bill against that deposit. The minimum total amount charged for deposit-based fees shall be the amount shown in the fixed fee / minimum fee column. [b] For applications received that include concurrent site plan review and use permit review, applicant shall pay 100% of the highest applicable review fee (use permit or site plan review fee) and 75% of the lower fee. Example: If concurrent application is received and base stand-alone fees are $5,670 for use permit and $7,088 for site plan review, the modified fee would be 100% of $7,088, plus 75% of $5,670.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 19
87 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

POLICE FEES
Fee Note
1 Fingerprinting fee
a) Live Scan Rolling Fee $25
b) Live Scan FBI Clearance $19 [a]
c) Live Scan DOJ Clearance $32 [a]
2 Fingerprinting fee - Hard Copy
a) First Card $25
b) Each Additional Card $5
3 Records Check (e.g., Local Criminal History Check; Clearance Letter) $25 4 Report Copy
a) Traffic Collision Report $15
b) Police Report $15
5 Citation Sign-Offs
a) Residents Free [b]
b) Non-Residents $10 [b]
6 Vehicle Release $150
7 Repossessed Vehicle Fee $15 [c]
8 Property Storage Fee (per item/weapon) $30
9 False Alarm Response (Per Calendar Year)
a) First No Charge
b) Second No Charge
c) Third $50
d) Fourth $100
e) Fifth and Each Additional $150
10 Noise Disturbance (Per Calendar Year)
a) First No Charge
b) Second No Charge
c) Third $50
d) Fourth $100
e) Fifth and Each Additional $150
Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 20
88 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

POLICE FEES
Description Fee Note
11 DUI Collision Cost Recovery (per hour)
a) Non-Overtime
i) Records Clerk $37
ii) Records Manager $53
iii) Community Services Officer $32
iv) Police Officer $46
v) Police Corporal $50
vi) Police Sergeant $60
vii) Police Lieutenant $74
b) Overtime
i) Records Clerk $49
ii) Records Manager $70
iii) Community Services Officer $43
iv) Police Officer $61
v) Police Corporal $67
vi) Police Sergeant $80
vii) Police Lieutenant $98
12 Special Requests for Police Services (per hour)
a) Non-Overtime
i) Records Clerk $37
ii) Records Manager $53
iii) Community Services Officer $32
iv) Police Officer $46
v) Police Corporal $50
vi) Police Sergeant $60
vii) Police Lieutenant $74
b) Overtime
i) Records Clerk $49
ii) Records Manager $70
iii) Community Services Officer $43
iv) Police Officer $61
v) Police Corporal $67
vi) Police Sergeant $80
vii) Police Lieutenant $98
13 Subpoena Response / Court Appearance Maximum Amount Allowed by Law [b] Signoffs are processed for Kerman residents or citations issued by Kerman Police Department. [c] Government Code 41612.
[a] Amounts established by other agencies. In the case of discrepancies, amounts adopted by other agencies (e.g., DOJ, FBI) shall supersede this schedule.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 21
89 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Fee Initial Deposit Fee Structure Note

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PROCESSING
(Fees include plan check, permit issuance, and inspection fees)

1 Utility Service Providers - Connection / Service / Repair up to 100 SF $300 Fixed Fee 2 Catch Basin / Dry Well / Manhole / Vault / Concrete Pads / Pole Set or Removal (per location)
$300 Fixed Fee
3 Trenching/Excavation for Infrastructure Installation
a) Bell Hole
i) Application Review Fee $225 Fixed Fee
ii) Permit and Inspection Fee (Greater of A or B)
a) Minimum fee per location $450 Fixed Fee
b) Fee per bore / pit / pothole $150 Fixed Fee
b) Street / Trench Cut
i) Application Review Fee $225 Fixed Fee
ii) Permit and Inspection Fee (Greater of A or B)
a) Minimum fee per location $450 Fixed Fee
b) Fee Per 100 SF $150 Fixed Fee
4 Driveway
a) Residential
i) First Approach $300 Fixed Fee
ii) Each Additional Approach $150 Fixed Fee
b) Commercial
i) First Approach $600 Fixed Fee
ii) Each Additional Approach $300 Fixed Fee
5 Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk
a) Residential $300 Fixed Fee [a]
b) Commercial $600 Fixed Fee [a]
6 Other General Temporary Encroachment Permit [b]
a) For Work Expected to Last No More than Two Weeks [b] i) Base Fee - Up to Two Days $375 Fixed Fee
ii) Each Additional Day $150 Fixed Fee
b) For Work Expected to Last More than Two Weeks $1,500 $1,500 Deposit with Minimum Fee
[b]
7 Agreement for Private Improvements In the Right-of-Way (Permanent Encroachment)
$525 Fixed Fee
OTHER
8 Extension of Time (per extension, if not separately charged against deposit) $150 Fixed Fee 9 Plan Revision (per revision, if not separately charged against deposit) $75 Fixed Fee 10 Excess Plan Review (per hour, if not separately charged against deposit) $150 Fixed Fee 11 Hourly Rate for Services Not Identified in this Schedule, Other Inspection, Missed/Excess Inspections, Re-inspection Fee

City of Kerman

PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Description Fee Initial Deposit Fee Structure Note
[b] General encroachment work includes any activity within the public right of way. Fixed fee permit applies to typical utility work with standard WATCH manual traffic control.

More complex work requiring additional plan check/traffic control, plan review, testing, and/or inspection, requires a deposit.

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

Overview of Fee Structure
Fees may be either fixed fees, deposits, or deposits with a minimum fee amount due. When a fee is deposit-based, the City will collect the initial deposit and bill against that deposit. The minimum total amount charged for deposit-based fees shall be the amount shown in the minimum fee column.

Full Cost Deposits and Deposit Replenishment
Applicants for full cost (deposit-based) submittals shall pay for all City staff and contract service provider time and materials required to process the application. A full cost reimbursement agreement shall be included with the project application submittal package. Projects outside the scope of this fee schedule will be subject to a full cost reimbursement agreement to be approved by the City Manager and/or City Council. This reimbursement agreement will include the identification of a work program and will include cost estimates for both City staff time and consultant services based on a defined scope of work.

Initial deposits will be collected and held by the City in a deposit account at the time the application is submitted. Project billing amounts will be drawn from the deposit account.

A positive account balance shall be maintained at all times during the review process. No work will be performed on a project with a negative fund balance. If the deposit is reduced to below 20% of the initial deposit amount, the applicant will be notified and required to supplement the deposit account with an additional amount no less than 50% of the original deposit.

DRAFT Appendix A: p. 23
91 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Fee Note
1 Water - Miscellaneous
a) Meter Testing $75 [a]
b) Cut Lock Fee $75
2 Water Waste Fines
a) Informational Notification No Charge
b) 1st Written Water Waste Notice No Charge
c) 2nd Written Water Waste Notice $25
d) 3rd Written Water Waste Notice $50
e) 4th Written Water Waste Notice $100
f) 5th Written Water Waste Notice $200
g) Subsequent Written Water Waste Notice Disconnection
3 Septic Tank Waste Disposal (cost per gallon)
a) From Septic Tank Waste Within City Limits $0.10
b) From Septic Tank Waste Outside City Limits $0.20
[a] Test amount refundable if meter reading is found to be inaccurate.

Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 24
92 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

CONSTRUCTION WATER METER RENTAL
Fee
Refundable
Deposit Charge Basis Note
1 Construction Water Meter $150; plus the cost of total water usage per month
$1,250 Each [a]
[a] See current utility rates for cost of water.

Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 25
93 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Dirt Purchase $45
plus $1 per CY
per request
2 Debris Clean-Up $98 per hour; 2-hour minimum
3 Grafitti Clean-Up $98 per hour; 2-hour minimum
4 Emergency Residential Tree-Trimming $98 per hour; 2-hour minimum 5 Rates for Services Not Listed Above
a) PW Encroachment Review $150 per hour; 1-hour minimum b) PW Utility Customer Service and City Maintenance
Services
$98 per hour; 1-hour minimum
Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 26
94 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM FEES
Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Youth Performing Arts
a) Per Participant $50
b) Late Fee $6
2 Summer Day Camp $3 per day
3 Youth Sports
a) Per Participant $50
b) Late Fee $6
4 Swim Lessons
a) Group $45
b) Private $75
5 Recreation Swim
a) 17 & Under $2.00
b) 18 & Older $2.50
c) Non-swimmer Entrance Fee $1.00
6 Pool Group Rental Rates
a) 1 to 75 $75 per hour
b) 76-100 $85 per hour
c) 101-125 $95 per hour
Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 27
95 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PARKS AND FACILITY RENTAL RATES AND CHARGES
Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Senior Center
a) Meeting Rate $40 per hour
b) Banquet Rate $60 per hour
c) Deposit $150 deposit
2 Kerckhoff Park
a) Scout Hut
i) Daily Rate $225 daily rate
ii) Deposit $150 deposit
b) Picnic Shelter $55 daily rate
c) Dance Pavilion $225 daily rate
d) RV / Car Show (Grass Area) $400 daily rate
e) Car Show in conjunction with Event $100 daily rate
3 Lions Park
a) Picnic Pavilion $110 daily rate
b) Athletic Field $85 daily rate
4 Plaza Park
a) Daily Rate ( Non Profit) $40 daily rate
b) Private (Per approval of Director or Designee) $65 daily rate 5 Additional Fees / Permits
a) Alcohol Permit $20
b) Dance Permit $20
c) Bounce House Permit $25
Description
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 28
96 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

KERMAN COMMUNITY CENTER RENTAL RATES AND CHARGES
Building Capacity
Room
Room
Dimensions
Square
Footage Theater Reception
Dance
(no seating)
Meeting /
Classroom
Multi-Purpose 60' x 100' 6,000 450 Chairs 400 Guests 475 Attendees 200 Attendees Central 40' x 60' 2,400 180 Chairs 150 Guests 300 Attendees 75 Attendees North / South 30' x 60' 1,800 90 Chairs 80 Guests N/A 40 Attendees User Classifications
Initial Deposit
Description Resident Rate Non-Resident Rate
Rental Deposit $450 $450
Rental Rates and Charges
Description / Attendance Resident Rate Non-Resident Rate 1 Banquets / Receptions
a) Private Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $460 $575
ii) 81 - 150 $560 $760
iii) 151 - 220 $635 $785
iv) 221 - 300 $700 $860
v) 301 - 400 $775 $935
vi) Each Additional Hour $110 $135
b) Non-Profit Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $400 $515
ii) 81 - 150 $450 $565
iii) 151 - 220 $500 $615
iv) 221 - 300 $550 $665
v) 301 - 400 $600 $715
vi) Each Additional Hour $110 $135
c) Additional Fees
i) Kitchen Usage $275 $275
ii) Decorating Time (2 hours) $75 $75
iii) Extra Attendant Time (per hour) $40 $40
iv) Alcohol Permit $20 $20
v) Dance Permit $20 $20
Resident - Residing within the 93630 Zip Code
Non-Resident - Residing outside of the 93630 Zip Code
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 29
97 Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

KERMAN COMMUNITY CENTER RENTAL RATES AND CHARGES
Rental Rates and Charges
Activity Description / Attendance Resident Rate Non-Resident Rate 2 Theater / Dance / Forum
a) Public Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $310 $395
ii) 81 - 150 $310 $395
iii) 151 - 220 $335 $425
iv) 221 - 300 $360 $455
v) 301 - 400 $385 $485
vi) Each Additional Hour $85 $110
b) Non-Profit Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $220 $300
ii) 81 - 150 $250 $330
iii) 151 - 220 $280 $330
iv) 221 - 300 $310 $390
v) 301 - 400 $340 $420
vi) Each Additional Hour $85 $110
c) Additional Fees
i) Kitchen Usage $275 $275
ii) Decorating Time (2 hours) $100 $100
iii) Extra Attendant Time (per hour) $40 $40
iv) Alcohol Permit $20 $20
v) Dance Permit $20 $20
Rental Rates and Charges
Activity Description / Attendance Resident Rate Non-Resident Rate 3 Meetings / Workshops / Conferences
Rates listed below are for a minimum of 2 hours
a) 1 - 49 $65 $65
b) 50 - 100 $75 $75
c) 101 - 200 $85 $85
d) Each Additional Hour Charged at 50%
of 2hr rate
Charged at 50%
of 2hr rate
Rental Rates and Charges
Activity Description / Attendance Resident Rate Non-Resident Rate 4 KUSD / Community Non-Profit Banquet / Funeral Flat Rate a) Banquet $400 $400
b) Meeting (per hour) $38 $38
c) Funeral $250 $250
d) Service Club (per hour) $28 $28
DRAFT Appendix A: p. 30
98 Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN

APPENDIX B

COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
DRAFT
99 Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
DRAFT
100
Section 7, Item A.

COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS PAGE
Administrative Fees 1
Animal Licensing and Regulation Fees 5
Building Fees 9
General Plan Update Fee 21
Technology Fee 23
Code Enforcement Fees 25
Engineering Improvement Review and Grading Plan Review Fees 28 Planning Fees 32
Police Fees 44
Public Works Fees 53
Citywide Overhead Allocation 62
Table of Contents
DRAFT
101
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Administrative Fees
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 1
102
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Administrative Services Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 410-10-00 Salary $24,648 $0 $24,648 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 410-20-00 Part-Time Wages $0 $0 $0 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 410-30-00 Overtime $0 $0 $0 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-11-00 FICA Tax Expense $1,528 $0 $1,528 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-12-00 $357 $0 $357 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-22-00 SUI Expense $0 $0 $0 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-40-00 Health Insurance Expense $3,598 $0 $3,598 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-50-00 Retirement City Contribution $2,166 $0 $2,166 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-51-00 CalPERS Unfunded Liability $1,872 $0 $1,872 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-55-00 Workers Compensation Expense $454 $0 $454 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 420-60-00 SDI Expense $403 $0 $403 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 510-01-00 Professional Fees $10,000 ($10,000) $0 [b] 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 510-10-00 Professional Services-Audit $74,280 ($74,280) $0 [b] 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 510-14-00 Professional Serv-Data Process $4,708 ($4,708) $0 [b] 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 521-01-00 Office Supplies $400 $0 $400 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 521-02-00 General Supplies $1,000 $0 $1,000 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 521-07-00 Postage $2,500 ($2,500) $0 [b] 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 540-00-00 Lease Expense $15,497 ($15,497) $0 [b] 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 540-02-00 Equipment Rental $12,146 ($12,146) $0 [b] 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 551-01-00 Communications-Telephone $492 $0 $492 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 551-02-00 Communications - Cell Phone $0 $0 $0 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 554-01-00 Travel-Meetings $2,500 $0 $2,500 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 555-00-00 Dues/Subscriptions $300 $0 $300 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 565-00-00 Internal Service Fund $558 $0 $558 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 575-00-00 Employee Educational Incentive $500 $0 $500 100 General Fund 5005 Admin Svcs 600-04-00 Machinery & Equipment $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $159,907 ($119,131) $40,776
Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
Modified
Expenses
DeMinimus
Rate Total Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation $40,776 10% $4,078 [c]
Total $40,776 $4,078
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 2
103
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Administrative Services Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Budget Expenses $40,776
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $4,078
Total $44,854
Annual Hours Per Direct FTE
Description Total Notes
Total Hours Per FTE 2,080
Less: Est Leave Time 240 [d]
Productive Hours 1,840
Direct Ratio 0.85 [e]
Direct Hours 1,564
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate
Description Total Notes
Expenses $44,854
FTE 0.48 [a]
Direct Hours 743
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $60
[a] Source: FY 21/22 Adopted Budget
[b] Adjustments to exclude items not related to the provision of fee-related services. [c] Primarily an overhead unit. Assume DeMinimus rate to account for services received from other overhead units. [d] Typical leave assumes 13 holidays, 10 days vacation, 5 days sick, 2 days personal leave per employee. Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates. [e] Includes general administration and management, training, code, policies and procedures updates, etc. Amount intended to serve as reasonable estimate.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 3
104
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
Finance Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Service Time Hourly Rate
Fee Description Finance Planning Building Finance Planning Building Cost of
Service
Current
Fee
Cost
Recovery
Proposed
Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery
Charge
Basis Note
1 Business License Application Review Fee
a) Physical Location within City Limits (Including Home Occupation) 0.50 0.50 0.50 x $60 $189 $163 = $206 $129 63% $150 73% Each b) Business Located Outside City Limits and Contractors without Physical Location within City Limits

0.50 0.25 x $60 $189 $163 = $77 varies $75 97% Each
2 Returned Check Fee; ACH/EFT Return/Error 0.67 x $60 $189 $163 = $40 $25 63% Each 3 Charitable Solicitation Car Wash Permit Fee 0.50 x $60 $189 $163 = $30 $10 33% $20 67% Each [a] 4 Utility Proof of Residency / Credit Reference Letter 0.25 x $60 $189 $163 = $15 n/a $10 67% Each 5 Utility Billing Account History Report 0.25 x $60 $189 $163 = $15 n/a $10 67% Each 6 Fireworks Permit 1.00 x $60 $189 $163 = $60 $40 67% $50 83% Per permit 7 Yard Sale Permit Fee 0.50 x $60 $189 $163 = $30 $5 17% $10 33% Per permit [a] Fee is refundable with documentation of approved costs. * Note: Current fees for home occupation and contractor licenses vary based on number of employees.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 4
105
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Animal Licensing and Regulation Fees
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 5
106
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Animal Control Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc
21/22
Budget Adjust Total Notes
100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 410-10-00 Salaries $41,214 $0 $41,214 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 410-30-00 Overtime $1,000 $0 $1,000 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 410-38-00 Uniform Allowance $2,200 $0 $2,200 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 410-40-00 Holiday Pay $0 $0 $0 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 420-51-00 CalPERS Unfunded Liability $3,131 $0 $3,131 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 420-00-00 Fringe Benefits $23,364 $0 $23,364 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 510-01-00 Professional Serv-Emp Hiring $2,000 $0 $2,000 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 515-01-00 Utilities $9,500 $0 $9,500 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 521-01-00 Office Supplies $100 $0 $100 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 521-02-00 General Supplies $4,000 $0 $4,000 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 521-06-00 Postage $1,000 $0 $1,000 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 521-07-00 Postage $500 $0 $500 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 551-02-00 Communications-Cellular Phone $540 $0 $540 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 551-01-00 Live Scan Line $1,000 $0 $1,000 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 554-01-00 Travel-Meetings $1,000 $0 $1,000 100 General Fund 3041 Animal Ctrl 565-00-00 Internal Service Fund $6,701 $0 $6,701 Subtotal $97,250 $0 $97,250
Allocation of Periodic Expenditures
Description Expense Useful Life Annual Cost Notes
Animal Control Facility $3,000,000 50 $60,000 [b]
Total $3,000,000 50 $60,000
Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description Total Adjust Total Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation $9,489 $0 $9,489 [c]
Total $9,489 $0 $9,489
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 6
107
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Animal Control Total Expenses for Fee Study
Description Total Notes
Direct Budget $97,250
Allocation of Periodic Expense $60,000
Allocation of C'wide OH $9,489
Total $166,739
Annual Hours Per Direct FTE
Description Total Notes
Total Hours Per FTE 2,080
Less: Est Leave Time 240 [d]
Productive Hours 1,840
Direct Ratio 0.85 [e]
Direct Hours 1,564
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate
Description Total Notes
Expenses $166,739
FTE 1.00 [f]
Direct Hours 1,564
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $107
Cost Recovery
Description Total Notes
Animal License $4,269 [g]
Expenditures $166,739
Cost Recovery Rate 3%
General Fund Subsidy $162,470
[a] Source: FY 21/22 Adopted Budget
[b] Source: Estimated costs in Measure M budget. See FY 21/22 adopted budget. Assumes 50-year straight line depreciation. [c] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [d] Typical leave assumes 13 holidays, 10 days vacation, 5 days sick, 2 days personal leave per employee. Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates. [e] Includes general administration and management, training, code, policies and procedures updates, etc. [f] Based on Animal Control Officer.
[g] Source: FY 21/22 Adopted Budget, page 26.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 7
108
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Animal Control Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hrs
FullyBurdened
Hourly
Est. Cost
of Service
Material
& Other
Costs Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Notes

Dog License Fees 3%
1 Spayed or Neutered Dog ↓
a) One Year Option $5 $15
b) Two Year Option $6 $20
c) Three Year Option $10 $30
2 Nonspayed or Unneutered Dog
a) One Year Option $17 $30
b) Two Year Option $30 $40
c) Three Year Option $40 $60
3 Delinquent Penalty $25
4 Lost Tag Replacement $5
5 Service Dog License $0
Impound Fees
6 Licensed Animal
a) First Impound $25
b) Second Impound $50
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $75
7 Unlicensed Animal
a) First Impound $50
b) Second Impound $100
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $150
8 Dangerous Animals
a) First Impound $100
b) Second Impound $200
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $300
9 Impound Fine for Nonspayed or Unneutered Animal
a) First Impound $35 [a]
b) Second Impound $50 [a]
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $100 [a]
10 Care and Feeding Per Day
a) Up to 100 lbs $15 $15
b) Over 100 lbs $25 $25
Owner Surrender Animals (Living or Dead)
11 Delivered to Shelter 0.50 x $107 = $54 $25 47%
12 Picked Up by Animal Control 1.00 x $107 = $107 $50 47% [a] Food and Agriculture Code Sections 30804.7 and 31751.7. These amounts are in addition to impound fees. see accompanying worksheet for cost recovery
see accompanying worksheet for cost recovery
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 8
109
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Building Fees
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 9
110
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Building Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc Budget Adjust Total Notes 100 General Fund 1042 Building 410-10-00 Salaries $57,655 $0 $57,655 100 General Fund 1042 Building 410-20-00 Part Time Salaries $3,875 $0 $3,875 100 General Fund 1042 Building 410-37-00 Vehicle Allowance $375 $0 $375 100 General Fund 1042 Building 420-51-00 CalPERS Unfunded Liability $4,789 $0 $4,789 100 General Fund 1042 Building 420-00-00 Fringe Benefits $19,530 $0 $19,530 100 General Fund 1042 Building 510-01-00 Contract Services - Weed Abatement $0 $0 $0 100 General Fund 1042 Building 510-03-00 Contract Services - Bldg Inspector $120,000 $0 $120,000 100 General Fund 1042 Building 510-03-01 Contract Services - Bldg Admin Services $5,000 $0 $5,000 100 General Fund 1042 Building 510-09-00 Professional Services - Digital Scan Plans $1,000 $0 $1,000 100 General Fund 1042 Building 510-10-00 Professional Services - Plan Check $45,000 $0 $45,000 100 General Fund 1042 Building 515-01-00 Utilities $3,125 $0 $3,125 100 General Fund 1042 Building 521-01-00 Office Supplies $1,250 $0 $1,250 100 General Fund 1042 Building 521-02-00 General Supplies $2,250 $0 $2,250 100 General Fund 1042 Building 521-06-00 Uniforms $250 $0 $250 100 General Fund 1042 Building 521-07-00 Postage $750 $0 $750 100 General Fund 1042 Building 540-02-00 Equipment Rent $1,250 $0 $1,250 100 General Fund 1042 Building 551-01-00 Communication - Telephone $600 $0 $600 100 General Fund 1042 Building 551-02-00 Communication - Cellular Phone $270 $0 $270 100 General Fund 1042 Building 554-01-00 Travel - Conferences - Meetings $0 $0 $0 100 General Fund 1042 Building 555-00-00 Dues & Subscriptions $100 $0 $100 100 General Fund 1042 Building 565-00-00 Internal Service Funds $2,797 $0 $2,797 100 General Fund 1042 Building 575-00-00 Educational Reimbursements $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $269,866 $0 $269,866
Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description Total Adjust Total Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation $208,978 $0 $208,978 [b]
Total $208,978 $0 $208,978
Allocation of Departmental Administration
Description Total Adjust Total Notes
Departmental Administration Allocation $0 $78,195 $78,195 [c] Total $0 $78,195 $78,195
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 10
111
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Building Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Budget Expenses $269,866
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $208,978
Allocation of Departmental Administration $78,195
Total $557,039
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort
Description Total Total Notes
General Admin; Mgmt; Policies; Procedures 12% $66,845 [d] Certification and Training 1% $5,570 [d]
Public Information and Assistance 12% $66,845 [d]
Plan Review, Permit, Issuance and Documentation 75% $417,779 [d] Total 100% $557,039
Allocation of Annual Costs to Core Service Areas
Description Total Total Notes
Plan Review, Permit, Issuance and Documentation 100% $557,039 Total 100% $557,039
Allocation of FTE and Contract Service Support
Description Total Hours Per FTE
Adjust for
Leave
Productive
Hours Per FTE Total Hours Notes
Assistant Planner 0.10 2,080 (240) 1,840 184 [e]
Building Permit Clerk 0.50 2,080 (240) 1,840 920 [e]
Contract Services - Bldg Inspector (25 hours per week) 1,250 [e] Contract Services - Bldg Official (8 hours per week) 400 [e] Contract Services - Plan Check (8 hours per week) 400 [e] Contract Services - Permit Clerk (40 hours per week - 70% of time to Bldg) 1,400 [e] Total
DRAFT
4,554
Appendix B: p. 11
112
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Building Allocation of Hours
Description Total Total Notes
Indirect 25% 1,139 [d]
Direct 75% 3,416 [d]
Total 100% 4,554
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate
Description Total Notes
Total Costs 557,039
Direct Hours 3,416
Total $163
Allocation of Planning & Building Revenues
Acct # Acct Desc Total Percentage Notes
100-0000-341-01-00 Planning & Zoning Fees $25,083 7% [a],[f] 100-0000-341-40-00 Building Permits $230,268 68% [a],[f] 100-0000-341-43-00 Plan Check Inspection Fees $76,822 23% [a],[f] 100-0000-341-48-00 Const & Demo Recycle Program $7,168 2% [a],[f] Total $339,340 100%
Average Annual Revenues
Description Share 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20
Most Recent
3-Yr Avg Notes
Building Fees $147,549 $278,970 $280,399 $422,084 $286,759 $506,482 $405,108 Total $147,549 $278,970 $280,399 $422,084 $286,759 $506,482 $405,108 Planning and Zoning Fees 7% $10,906 $20,621 $20,726 $31,199 $21,196 $37,438 $29,944 [f] Building & Construction Fees 93% $136,643 $258,349 $259,673 $390,885 $265,563 $469,044 $375,164 [f] Total 100% $147,549 $278,970 $280,399 $422,084 $286,759 $506,482 $405,108 Cost Recovery
Description Total
Average Revenue $375,164
Expenditures $557,039
Cost Recovery Rate 67%
General Fund Subsidy $181,875
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 12
113
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Building [a] Source: FY 22/23 Adopted Budget
[b] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [c] See Planning worksheet for details.
[d] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. [e] Based on feedback provided by Community Development personnel. Based on current levels of contract service support provided. [f] Based on FY 21/22 adopted budget allocation. Amount intended to serve as a reasonable estimate.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 13
114
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description Total Hourly Rate Cost of Svc Current Fee Current Est.

Cost Recovery
Proposed
Cost Recovery Proposed Fee Note
1 HVAC Change-Out - Residential 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 49% $80 2 Water Heater Change-Out - Residential 0.75 x $163 = $122 varies varies 49% $60 3 Re-Roof - Residential 1.50 x $163 = $245 varies varies 49% $120 4 Line Repair - Sewer / Water / Gas 0.75 x $163 = $122 varies varies 100% $122 5 Service Panel Upgrade - Residential 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163 6 Electric Vehicle Charger - Residential 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163 7 Battery Backup Storage - Residential 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163 8 Generator - Residential 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163 9 Residential Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit
a) 15kW or less 1.75 x $163 = $285 varies varies $285 [a] b) Above 15kW varies varies $450 base fee, plus $15 per kW for each kW above 15kW
[a]
10 Commercial Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit
a) 50kW or less varies varies $1,000 [a]
b) 50kW – 250kW varies varies $1,000 base fee, plus $7 per kW for each kW above 50kW up to 250kW
[a]
c) Above 250kW varies varies $2,400 base fee, plus $5 per kW for each kW above 250 kW
[a]
11 Ground-Mount Solar - Residential
a) 15kW or less 2.75 x $163 = $448 varies varies $450 [a] b) Above 15kW varies varies $450 base fee, plus $15 per kW for each kW above 15kW
[a]
12 Demolition - Residential Single Family 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163 13 Demolition - Commercial 2.00 x $163 = $326 varies varies 100% $326 14 Temporary Power Pole 0.75 x $163 = $122 varies varies 100% $122 15 Swimming Pool/Spa - Residential 3.50 x $163 = $571 varies varies 100% $571 16 Swimming Pool/Spa Equipment Change-out Only -
Residential

1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163
17 Swimming Pool Replaster - Residential 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163 18 Voluntary Seismic Retrofit - Residential 1.50 x $163 = $245 varies varies 100% $245 DRAFT Appendix B: p. 14
115
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description Total Hourly Rate Cost of Svc Current Fee Current Est.

Cost Recovery
Proposed
Cost Recovery Proposed Fee Note
19 Retaining Wall
a) Wall Under 4' in Height from Bottom of Footing 2.00 x $163 = $326 varies varies 100% $326 b) Wall Over 4' in Height from Bottom of Footing
i) Up to 100 LF 4.00 x $163 = $652 varies varies 100% $652 ii) Each Additional 100 LF 0.25 x $163 = $41 varies varies 100% $41 20 CMU Wall
a) Wall Under 6' in height 2.00 x $163 = $326 varies varies 100% $326 b) Wall Over 6' in height
i) Up to 100 LF 4.00 x $163 = $652 varies varies 100% $652 ii) Each Additional 100 LF 0.25 x $163 = $41 varies varies 100% $41 21 Window / Sliding Glass Door - Retrofit / Repair /
Replacement
a) Up to 5 1.00 x $163 = $163 varies varies 100% $163
b) Over 5 x $163 = varies varies varies See Permit Fee Table [a] Total fees shall not exceed amounts outlined in California Government Code 66015(a)(1).

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 15
116
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. City
Staff Labor
Hrs
FullyBurdened
Hourly
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Unit Notes
Permit Fee for New Buildings, Additions, Tenant Improvements, Residential Remodels, and Combined Mechanical, Electrical, and/or Plumbing Permits
1 $1 - $2,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
2 $2,001 - $25,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
3 $25,001 - $50,000 4.00 x $163 = $652 $652 100%
4 $50,001 - $100,000 6.00 x $163 = $978 $978 100%
5 $100,001 - $500,000 12.00 x $163 = $1,956 $1,956 100% 6 $500,001 - $1,000,000 28.00 x $163 = $4,564 $4,564 100% 7 $1,000,001 and up 44.00 x $163 = $7,172 $7,172 100%
For permits requiring plumbing, electric, or mechanical review, the following percentages shall be added to the base permit fee 1 Mechanical 10% 10% 100%
2 Plumbing 10% 10% 100%
3 Electrical 10% 10% 100%
Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Mechanical Permit
1 Up to $2,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
2 $2,001 - $4,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
3 $4,001 - $10,000 1.50 x $163 = $245 $245 100%
4 $10,001 and up 2.00 x $163 = $326 $326 100%
Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Plumbing Permit
1 Up to $2,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
2 $2,001 - $4,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
3 $4,001 - $10,000 1.50 x $163 = $245 $245 100%
4 $10,001 and up 2.00 x $163 = $326 $326 100%
Permit Fee for Stand-Alone Electrical Permit
1 Up to $2,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
2 $2,001 - $4,000 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
3 $4,001 - $10,000 1.50 x $163 = $245 $245 100%
4 $10,001 and up 2.00 x $163 = $326 $326 100%
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 16
117
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Building Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description Est. City Staff Labor Hrs
FullyBurdened
Hourly
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Notes
1 Building Plan Check Fees - Building
a) Plan Review Fee, if applicable 75% 75% 100% [a]
b) Expedited Plan Check (per hour, 2-hour minimum) 1.00 x $196 = $196 $196 100% c) Revision Application Fee (per hour) (1-hour minimum) 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100% d) Production Units / Lot Specific Units 20% 20% of standard plan check fee 100% [b] e) Alternate Methods and Materials Review (per hour) 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100% f) Excess Plan Review Fee (3rd and subsequent) (per hour) 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100% g) Revisions (per hour) 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
h) Deferred Plan Submittals (per hour, 2-hour minimum) 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100% 2 Building Plan Check Fees - Planning
(Fees Only Applied to Projects Requiring Review)
a) Alterations/Additions - Residential 0.75 x $189 = $142 $95 67% b) New Construction - Single Family Residential 1.50 x $189 = $284 $189 67% c) New Construction - 2-4 Residential Units 1.75 x $189 = $331 $189 57% d) New Construction - 5+ Residential Units 4.00 x $189 = $756 $378 50% e) New Construction - Non-Residential 5.50 x $189 = $1,040 $378 36% f) Alterations/Additions - Non-Residential 0.75 x $189 = $142 $95 67% [a] Includes initial plan check, plus two back checks. The City will bill hourly for additional plan review required. [b] For identical buildings built by the same builder on the same lot or in the same tract and for which building permits are issued at the same time. Note: Flop plans are not considered identical plans.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 18
119
Section 7, Item A.

1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
b) Reactivation Fee - All Other Scenarios
i) Permit Expired Up to One Year 50% of Original Base Building Permit Fee ii) Permit Expired More than One Year 100% of Original Base Building Permit Fee 9 Permit Reissuance Fee 0.50 x $163 = $82 $82 100%
10 Damaged Building Survey (Fire, Flood, Vehicle Damage, Etc.) 1.50 x $163 = $245 $245 100% 11 AB 838 Violation Fees
a) Investigation resulting in Violations under AB 838 (per hour) (1-hour minimum) 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100% b) Inspection Report Production for Violations under AB 838 (per hour) (1-hour minimum)

1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100%
Other Fees
12 Phased Inspection Fee (per inspection) 0.50 x $163 = $82 $82 100% 13 After Hours Inspection (per hour) (2-hour minimum) 1.00 x $196 = $196 $196 100% 14 Re-inspection Fee (as determined by City Building Official) (each) 0.50 x $163 = $82 $82 100% [b] 15 Duplicate Copy of Permit 0.33 x $163 = $54 $54 100%
16 Duplicate Copy of Certificate of Occupancy 0.17 x $163 = $27 $27 100% 17 Construction and Demolition Waste Management Review Fee 1.00 x $163 = $163 $163 100% 18 Fees for Services Not Listed in this Fee Schedule (per 1/2 hour) 0.50 x $163 = $82 $82 100% DRAFT Appendix B: p. 19
120
Section 7, Item A.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 20
121
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
General Plan Maintenance Fee
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 21
122
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Calculation - General Plan Maintenance Fee Estimated Expenditures
# Description Total
Amortization /
Update Frequency Annual Cost Notes
1 General Plan Update - Consulting Costs $500,000 20 $ 25,000 [a] 1 General Plan Update - City Staff Costs $125,000 20 $ 6,250 [a] 2 Housing Element $20,000 4 $ 5,000 [a]
3 Zoning Code $5,000 1 $ 5,000 [a]
4 Total $650,000 $ 41,250
Estimated Base for Revenue
# Account Total
5 Building Permits $230,268
6 Total $ 230,268
Calculation of Fee at Full Cost Recovery
# Description Total
7 Annual Revenue Requirement $ 41,250
8 Estimated Annual Permit Fees $ 230,268
9 General Plan Maintenance Fee as a % of Permit Fee 18% Cost Recovery Analysis
# Description Current Fee
Fee at Full Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
10 General Plan Maintenance Fee varies 18% 5%
Revenue Analysis
# Description
Revenue at Full
Cost Recovery
Revenue at
Targeted Fee
GF Subsidy at
Proposed Fee
11 General Plan Maintenance Fee $41,250 $11,513 $29,737 12 Cost Recovery % 28%
[a] Costs and useful life estimated by ClearSource. Amounts are intended to represent conservative, reasonable, estimates.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 22
123
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Technology Enhancement Fee
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 23
124
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Calculation - Technology Enhancement Fee Estimated Expenditures
# Description Total
Amortization /
Update Frequency Annual Cost Notes
1 Initial Outlay for Enhanced Permit/Project Tracking $100,000 10 $ 10,000 [a] 2 Initial Upgrades to Hardware (e.g. monitor, computers) $25,000 5 $ 5,000 [a] 3 On-going Licensing & Consulting Support $5,000 1 $ 5,000 [a] 4 Total $130,000 $ 20,000
Estimated Base for Revenue
# Acct Desc Total
5 Building Permits $230,268
6 $ 230,268
Calculation of Fee at Full Cost Recovery
# Description Total
7 Annual Revenue Requirement $ 20,000
8 Estimated Annual Permit Fees $ 230,268
9 Technology Fee as a Percent of Permit Fee 9%
Cost Recovery Analysis
# Description Current Fee
Fee at Full Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee Notes
10 Technology Enhancement Fee varies 9% 5%
Revenue Analysis
# Description
Revenue at Full
Cost Recovery
Revenue at
Targeted Fee
GF Subsidy at
Proposed Fee
11 Technology Enhancement Fee $20,000 $11,513 $8,487
12 Cost Recovery % 58%
[a] Useful life and ongoing licensing costs, and annual revenues estimated by ClearSource. Amounts are intended to represent reasonable estimates.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 24
125
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Code Enforcement Fees
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 25
126
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Calculation - Code Enforcement
Description
Fully-Burdened
Hourly Rate Allocation Notes
Contract Share $95 65% [a]
City Share $51 35% [a]
Hourly Rate $146 100%
Notes:
[a] Source: Hourly rates and allocations based on current industry contract service rates and contract service/agency allocations.

Amount is intended to serve as a reasonable estimate.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 26
127
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
Cost of Service Study for Analyzing User and Regulatory Fees Calculation of the Estimated Costs of Providing Fee Related Services - Code Enforcement Hourly Rates
Estimated Labor Time (Hours) $60 $146 Cost Recovery Information Fee Description Finance Code Enf. Total Finance Code Enf.

Cost of
Service Current Fee
Current Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed Cost
Recovery Fee Change Note
1 Inspection / Re-Inspection
a) First Inspection 0.50 0.50 $0 $73 $73 No Charge 0%
b) Second Inspection to Verify Violation Corrected 0.50 0.50 $0 $73 $73 No Charge 0% c) Each Additional Inspection 0.50 0.50 $0 $73 $73 $70 96% 2 Abatement Warrant 2.00 2.00 $292 $292 $250 86%
3 Serving Notice 0.50 0.50 $0 $73 $73 $70 96%
4 Lien Approval Fee 0.50 1.00 1.50 $30 $146 $176 $150 85% 5 Special Assessment Approval Fee 0.50 1.00 1.50 $30 $146 $176 $150 85% 6 Lien Release Fee 0.50 1.50 2.00 $30 $219 $249 $50 20% 7 Abandoned Property Registration & Monitoring Fee
a) Registration Fee
i) Initial 0.50 0.50 $0 $73 $73 $50 68% $70 96%
ii) Renewal 0.50 0.50 $0 $73 $73 $70 96%
b) Monitoring Fee (per year)
i) Initial 2.00 2.00 $0 $292 $292 $140 48%
ii) Renewal 2.00 2.00 $0 $292 $292 $140 48%
8 Rates for Services Not Listed Above
a) Code Enforcement Personnel (per hour) 1.00 1.00 $0 $146 $146 $146 100% b) Specialized Services Including, but not limited to,
Attorney and Abatement Services
Actual Cost 100%
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 27
128
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Engineering Improvement Review and Grading Plan Review Fees DRAFT Appendix B: p. 28
129
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Calculation - Community Development Engineering Description
Fully-Burdened
Hourly Rate Allocation Notes
Contract Share $165 85% [a]
City Share $29 15% [a]
Hourly Rate $194 100%
Notes:
[a] Source: Hourly rates and allocations based on current industry contract service rates and contract service/agency allocations.

Amount is intended to serve as a reasonable estimate.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 29
130
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Grading Plan Check and Permit Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description Unit
Est. Labor
Hours Hourly Rate
Est. Cost of
Svc Current Fee
Current Est.

Cost Recovery
Proposed Fee /
Initial Deposit
Proposed
Cost Recovery Note

GRADING
1 Grading Plan Check
a) Parcels under 1 acre over 50 CY 8.0 x $194 = $1,552 varies varies $1,552 100% [a] b) 1.00 - 5.00 acres
i) First acre 8.0 x $194 = $1,552 varies varies $1,552 100% [a] ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof up to 5 acres 1.0 x $194 = $194 varies varies $194 100% [a] c) 5.01 - 10.00 acres
i) First 5.01 acres 12.0 x $194 = $2,328 varies varies $2,328 100% [a] ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof up to 10 acres 1.0 x $194 = $194 varies varies $194 100% [a] d) Over 10 acres
i) First 10.01 acres 17.0 x $194 = $3,298 varies varies $3,298 100% [a] ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof 0.8 x $194 = $146 varies varies $146 100% [a] 2 Permit Issuance - Onsite Construction / Grading 0.50 x $194 = $97 varies varies $97 100% 3 Extension of Time 0.50 x $194 = $97 varies varies $97 100% 4 Fee for Additional Services Required Due to Changes, Modifications, Additions, etc. Actual Costs / T&M plus 15%
admin fee
5 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff per hour 1.00 x $194 = $194 varies varies $194 100% b) Contract Service Providers varies varies Pass-through of Consultant Costs
plus 15% admin
fee
100%
[a] Amount shown is initial deposit.

Note: 15% admin fee charged to time and materials is intended to represent a conservative, reasonable estimate of actual city costs: assumes 10% de minimus rate for citywide overhead support, and .5 hours of direct service divisional support for every 10 hours of contract service time.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 30
131
Section 7, Item A.

Cost Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost Recovery Note
1 Subdivision Map Engineering Plan Check & Inspection
Cost of Improvements
a) First $50,000 % of Cost 16.0 x $194 = $3,104 7.0% varies 10.0% varies [a] b) $50,001 to $300,000 % of Cost 48.0 x $194 = $9,312 5.5% varies 6.0% varies [a] c) $300,001 to $700,000 % of Cost 128.0 x $194 = $24,832 4.0% varies 4.0% varies [a] d) Greater than $700,000 % of Cost 128.0 x $194 = $24,832 2.5% varies 2.5% varies [a] 2 Fee for Additional Services Required Due to Changes, Modifications, Additions, etc. Actual Costs / T&M plus 15%
admin fee
3 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff per hour 1.00 x $194 = $194 varies varies $194 100% b) Contract Service Providers varies varies Pass-through of Consultant Costs
plus 15% admin
fee
100%
[a] Estimate of 25% of fee due at initial submittal. Amount shown is intended to serve as a reasonable estimate, however the City reserves the right to collect additional fees for work outside of typical scope. Fees are additive (e.g., For $75,000 of improvements the fee is calculated as follows: For the first $50,000 of improvements fee is 10% of engineer's cost estimate. For the next $25,000 of improvements the fee is 6% of engineer's cost estimate).

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 31
132
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Planning Fees
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 32
133
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc Budget Adjust Subtotal 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 410-10-00 Salaries $ 123,062 $ - $ 123,062 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 410-20-00 Part Time Salaries $ 10,175 $ - $ 10,175 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 410-30-00 Overtime $ - $ - $ - 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 410-37-00 Vehicle Allowance $ 1,275 $ - $ 1,275 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 420-51-00 CalPERS Unfunded Liability $ 10,222 $ - $ 10,222 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 420-00-00 Fringe Benefits $ 41,717 $ - $ 41,717 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 510-01-00 Contract Services - LAFCO $ 2,500 $ - $ 2,500 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 510-02-00 Contract Services - Sphere of Influence $ - $ - $ - 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 510-10-00 Professional Services (Planners) $ 35,000 $ - $ 35,000 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 510-10-01 Professional Services (Environmental) $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 515-01-00 Utilities $ 3,125 $ - $ 3,125 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 521-01-00 Office Supplies $ 1,250 $ - $ 1,250 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 521-02-00 General Supplies $ 2,500 $ - $ 2,500 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 521-06-00 Uniforms $ 250 $ - $ 250 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 521-07-00 Postage $ 300 $ - $ 300 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 540-02-00 Equipment Rent $ 1,250 $ - $ 1,250 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 551-01-00 Communication - Telephone $ 600 $ - $ 600 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 551-02-00 Communication - Cellular Phone $ 270 $ - $ 270 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 552-01-00 Public Notice/Advertising $ 2,500 $ - $ 2,500 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 554-01-00 Travel - Conferences - Meetings $ 3,000 $ - $ 3,000 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 555-00-00 Dues & Subscriptions (GIS) $ 2,000 $ - $ 2,000 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 565-00-00 Internal Service Funds $ 2,708 $ - $ 2,708 100 General Fund 1008 Planning 575-00-00 Educational Reimbursements $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ 263,704 $ - $ 263,704
Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description Total Adjust SubTotal
Planning
Share
Building
Share
Engineering
Share Total Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation $204,205 $ - $ 204,205 $ 156,429 $ 34,126 $ 13,650 $ 204,205 [c] Total $ 204,205 $ - $ 204,205
DRAFT
$ 156,429 $ 34,126 $ 13,650 $ 204,205
Appendix B: p. 33
134
Section 7, Item A.

Planning
Share
Building
Share
Engineering
Share Total
Planning
Share
Building
Share
Engineering
Share Total Notes
65% 25% 10% 100% $79,990 $30,766 $12,306 $123,062 [b]
100% 0% 0% 100% $10,175 $0 $0 $10,175
100% 0% 0% 100% $0 $0 $0 $0
65% 25% 10% 100% $829 $319 $128 $1,275 [b]
65% 25% 10% 100% $6,644 $2,556 $1,022 $10,222 [b]
65% 25% 10% 100% $27,116 $10,429 $4,172 $41,717 [b]
100% 0% 0% 100% $2,500 $0 $0 $2,500
100% 0% 0% 100% $0 $0 $0 $0
100% 0% 0% 100% $35,000 $0 $0 $35,000
100% 0% 0% 100% $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000
100% 0% 0% 100% $3,125 $0 $0 $3,125
100% 0% 0% 100% $1,250 $0 $0 $1,250
100% 0% 0% 100% $2,500 $0 $0 $2,500
100% 0% 0% 100% $250 $0 $0 $250
100% 0% 0% 100% $300 $0 $0 $300
100% 0% 0% 100% $1,250 $0 $0 $1,250
100% 0% 0% 100% $600 $0 $0 $600
100% 0% 0% 100% $270 $0 $0 $270
100% 0% 0% 100% $2,500 $0 $0 $2,500
100% 0% 0% 100% $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000
100% 0% 0% 100% $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000
100% 0% 0% 100% $2,708 $0 $0 $2,708
100% 0% 0% 100% $0 $0 $0 $0
$202,007 $44,069 $17,628 $263,704
77%
DRAFT
17% 7% 100% [b]
Appendix B: p. 34
135
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc Budget Adjust Subtotal Allocation of Total Costs
Description
Planning
Share
Building
Share
Engineering
Share
Engineering
Share Notes
Departmental Budget $202,007 $44,069 $17,628 $263,704
Allocated Citywide Overhead $156,429 $34,126 $13,650 $204,205 Total $358,437 $78,195 $31,278 $467,909
[b] Departmental administration support provided to Building and Engineering units is budgeted in Planning. For purposes of this allocation, amounts are allocated among the three divisions receiving departmental administration support. [a] Source: FY 22/23 Adopted Budget
[c] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 35
136
Section 7, Item A.

Planning
Share
Building
Share
Engineering
Share Total
Planning
Share
Building
Share
Engineering
Share Total Notes
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 36
137
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning Allocation of Annual Labor Effort
Description Total Total Notes
General Admin; Mgmt; Policies; Procedures 18% $64,519 [d] Certification and Training 2% $7,169 [d]
Public Information and Assistance 15% $53,765 [d]
Direct Planning Activities 65% $232,984 [d]
Total 100% $358,437
Allocation of Annual Costs to Core Service Areas
Description Initial Alloc
Pro-Rata
Alloc Total Notes
Long Range and Regional Planning 20% 31% $110,288 [d]
City Council / Other Dept Muni Code Support 5% 8% $27,572 [d] Current Planning and Permit Support 40% 62% $220,576 [d] Total 65% 100% $358,437
Allocation of FTE
Description Total Hours Per FTE
Adjust for
Leave
Productive
Hours Per FTE Total Hours Notes
Assistant Planner 0.90 2,080 (240) 1,840 1,656 [a]
Permit Clerk 0.50 2,080 (240) 1,840 920 [a]
Community Dev Director 0.65 2,080 (240) 1,840 1,196 [a] Total 3,772
Description
Share of Total
Hours Total Notes
Planning 65% 2,452
Building 25% 943
Engineering 10% 377
Total 100% 3,772
Allocation of FTE and Contract Service Support
Description Total Hours Notes
In-House FTE 2,452 [a]
Contract Services - LAFCO 20 [e]
Contract Services - Sphere of Influence 0 [e]
Professional Services (Planners) 280 [e]
Professional Services (Environmental) 160 [e]
Total 2,912
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 37
138
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning Allocation of Hours
Description Total Total Notes
Indirect 35% 1,019 [d]
Direct 65% 1,893 [d]
Total 100% 2,912
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate
Description Total Notes
Total Costs 358,437
Direct Hours 1,893
Total $189
Allocation of Planning & Building Revenues
Acct # Acct Desc Total Percentage Notes
100-0000-341-01-00 Planning & Zoning Fees $25,083 7% [a],[f] 100-0000-341-40-00 Building Permits $230,268 68% [a],[f] 100-0000-341-43-00 Plan Check Inspection Fees $76,822 23% [a],[f] 100-0000-341-48-00 Const & Demo Recycle Program $7,168 2% [a],[f] Total $339,340 100%
Average Annual Revenues
Description Share 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20
Most Recent
3-Yr Avg Notes
Building Fees $147,549 $278,970 $280,399 $422,084 $286,759 $506,482 $405,108 Total $147,549 $278,970 $280,399 $422,084 $286,759 $506,482 $405,108 Planning and Zoning Fees 7% $10,906 $20,621 $20,726 $31,199 $21,196 $37,438 $29,944 [f] Building & Construction Fees 93% $136,643 $258,349 $259,673 $390,885 $265,563 $469,044 $375,164 [f] Total 100% $147,549 $278,970 $280,399 $422,084 $286,759 $506,482 $405,108 Cost Recovery
Description Total
Average Revenue $29,944
Expenditures $220,576
Cost Recovery Rate 14%
General Fund Subsidy $190,632
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 38
139
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Planning [a] Source: FY 22/23 Adopted Budget.
[c] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [d] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. [b] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [c] See Planning worksheet for details.
[d] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. [e] Based on feedback provided by Community Development personnel. Based on current levels of contract service support provided. [f] Based on FY 21/22 adopted budget allocation. Amount intended to serve as a reasonable estimate. [b] Departmental administration support provided to Building and Engineering units is budgeted in Planning. For purposes of this allocation, amounts are allocated among the three divisions receiving departmental administration support.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 39
140
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Analysis - Planning Fees
Fee Description
T
y
p
e
Est. Labor
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Cost of
Service Current Fee
Cost
Recovery
Proposed Fixed Fee or
Minimum Fee
Proposed
Initial Deposit
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Charge Basis Note
Appeal
1 Appeal
a) Applicant Requested 20.00 x $189 = $3,780 $300 - $340 8% $1,000 26% Per Appeal b) Non-Applicant Requested 20.00 x $189 = $3,780 $300 - $340 8% $2,850 75% Per Appeal Annexation
2 Annexation 80.00 x $189 = $15,120 $2,000 13% $10,000 $10,000 100% Deposit with Minimum Fee
[a]
Use Permit
3 Administrative Use Permit 20.00 x $189 = $3,780 n/a $1,890 50% Fixed Fee [b] 4 Conditional Use Permit
a) CUP - Minor - No New Construction 20.00 x $189 = $3,780 $500 13% $2,835 75% Fixed Fee [b] b) CUP - Major - New Construction 40.00 x $189 = $7,560 $1,300 17% $5,670 75% Fixed Fee [b] c) CUP - Alcohol with PCN Consideration varies n/a Base CUP fee plus 25% 75% Fixed Fee [b] d) CUP - Amendment 6.00 x $189 = $1,134 $450 40% 50% of current equivalent fee 75% Fixed Fee [b] e) CUP - Extension 3.00 x $189 = $567 $150 26% $425 75% Fixed Fee [b] 5 Temporary Use Permit
a) Temporary Use Permit (First Time Applicant) 2.25 x $189 = $425 $180 42% $319 75% Fixed Fee [b] b) Temporary Use Permit (Reccurring Annual Event) 1.00 x $189 = $189 $180 95% $142 75% Fixed Fee [b] Environmental
6 Categorical Exemption Review 4.00 x $189 = $756 $100 13% $189 25% Fixed Fee 7 Recordation of Notice of Determination 1.50 $189 $284 n/a 0% $189 67% Fixed Fee 8 Negative Declaration 56.00 x $189 = $10,584 Cost + 15% 100% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial
deposit
9 Mitigated Negative Declaration 76.00 x $189 = $14,364 Cost + 15% 100% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial
deposit
10 Environmental Impact Report 80.00 x $189 = $15,120 Cost + 15% 100% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial
deposit
General Plan Amendment / Specific Plan
11 General Plan Amendment 80.00 x $189 = $15,120 $1,500 10% $7,500 $7,500 100% Deposit with Minimum Fee
12 Specific Plan
a) Specific Plan 120.00 x $189 = $22,680 Cost + 15% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial
deposit
b) Specific Plan Amendment varies 50% of cost of
specific plan
pass-through actual costs plus
15% city admin fee
$5,000 100% T&M with initial
deposit
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 40
141
Section 7, Item A.

20.00 x $189 = $3,780 $500 - $1,400 13% - 37% $1,890 50% Fixed Fee [b] ii) +1,201 sq. ft. - 15,000 sq. ft. (Minor Construction) 50.00 x $189 = $9,450 $500 - $1,400 5% - 15% $7,088 75% Fixed Fee [b] iii) +15,001 sq. ft. (Major Construction) 60.00 x $189 = $11,340 $500 - $1,400 4% - 12% $11,340 100% Fixed Fee [b] b) Residential
i) 1-4 Multi-Family Units 20.00 x $189 = $3,780 $500 - $1,400 13% - 37% $1,890 50% Fixed Fee [b] ii) 5-40 Multi-Family Units 50.00 x $189 = $9,450 $500 - $1,400 5% - 15% $7,088 75% Fixed Fee [b] iii) +41 Multi-Family Units 60.00 x $189 = $11,340 $500 - $1,400 4% - 12% $11,340 100% Fixed Fee [b] c) Site Plan Review - Amendment 50% of current equivalent fee [b] d) Site Plan Review - Extension 3.00 x $189 = $567 $150 26% $425 75% Fixed Fee [b] Subdivisions
14 Lot Line Adjustment 8.00 x $189 = $1,512 $350 23% $1,134 75% Fixed Fee 15 Parcel Merger 8.00 x $189 = $1,512 $350 23% $1,134 75% Fixed Fee 16 Parcel Map Waiver 8.00 x $189 = $1,512 $500 33% $1,134 75% Fixed Fee 17 Certificate of Correction / Certificate of Compliance 4.00 x $189 = $756 varies varies $567 75% Fixed Fee 18 Tentative Parcel Map (4 lots or less) 24.00 x $189 = $4,536 $900 20% $2,268 50% Fixed Fee 19 Tentative Parcel Map - Amendment 8.00 x $189 = $1,512 $355 23% $756 50% Fixed Fee 20 Tentative Parcel Map - Extension 3.00 x $189 = $567 $270 48% $425 75% Fixed Fee 21 Tentative Subdivision Map (5 lots or more)
a) 100 Lots or Less 40.00 x $189 = $7,560 $2,000 plus $26/lot varies $5,670 75% Fixed Fee b) More than 100 Lots
i) Base Fee for the first 100 Lots 40.00 x $189 = $7,560 $2,000 plus $26/lot varies $5,670 75% Fixed Fee ii) Per Lot Fee for each additional lot 0.17 x $189 = $32 $26 83% $24 75% Fixed Fee 22 Tentative Subdivision Map - Amendment 16.00 x $189 = $3,024 $900 30% $2,268 75% Fixed Fee DRAFT Appendix B: p. 41
142
Section 7, Item A.

4.00 x $189 $756 $35 5% $375 50% Fixed Fee
Signs
35 Temporary Sign Permit 0.33 x $189 = $62 $25 40% No Charge 0% Fixed Fee 36 Tenant Specific Sign Permit 3.50 x $189 = $662 $75 11% $331 50% Fixed Fee 37 Master Sign Program 15.00 x $189 = $2,835 $150 5% $1,418 50% Fixed Fee DRAFT Appendix B: p. 42
143
Section 7, Item A.

Note: In addition to amounts shown above, applicant is responsible for any amounts due to outside agencies (e.g., LAFCO, Department of Fish & Wildlife, County).

Note: Administrative Use Permit is not currently authorized by the City's Municipal Code. The amount shown represents recommended fee assuming permit processed is authorized by the City Council. [b] For applications received that include concurrent site plan review and use permit review, applicant shall pay 100% of the highest applicable review fee (use permit or site plan review fee) and 75% of the lower fee. Example: If concurrent application is received and base stand-alone fees are $5,670 for use permit and $7,088 for site plan review, the modified fee would be 100% of $7,088, plus 75% of $5,670.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 43
144
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Police Fees
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 44
145
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Police Allocation of FTEs [a]
Description Salary Total Dept Admin Ops Direct
Records
Management Notes
Administrative Assistant $4,500 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 [b],[c] Chief of Police $9,210 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 [b],[c]
Police Officer $5,445 20.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 [b],[c]
Comm. Service Officer $3,651 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 [b],[c] Records Clerk $4,228 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 [b],[c]
Records Manager $5,978 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 [b],[c]
Sergeant $7,162 4.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 [b],[c]
Lieutenant $8,415 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 [b],[c]
Total PD Excluding Animal Control 31.00 3.00 25.00 2.00 Allocation of FTEs
Description Salary Total Dept Admin Ops Direct
Records
Management Notes
Administrative Assistant $4,500 1.00 4,500.00 0.00 0.00 Chief of Police $9,210 1.00 9,210.00 0.00 0.00
Police Officer $5,445 20.00 0.00 108,900.00 0.00
Comm. Service Officer $3,651 2.00 0.00 7,302.00 0.00
Records Clerk $4,228 1.00 0.00 0.00 4,228.00
Records Manager $5,978 1.00 0.00 0.00 5,978.00
Sergeant $7,162 4.00 0.00 28,648.00 0.00
Lieutenant $8,415 1.00 8,415.00 0.00 0.00
Total 31.00 22,125.00 144,850.00 10,206.00
Share of PD Excluding Animal Control 100% 12% 82% 6%
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 45
146
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Police Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc
21/22
Budget Adjust Total Dept Admin Ops
Records
Mgmt Total Notes
100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-10-00 Salary $1,686,744 $0 $1,686,744 $210,628 $1,378,957 $97,160 $1,686,744 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-15-00 Salary-ACT $70,853 $0 $70,853 $0 $70,853 $0 $70,853 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-15-01 Other Pay-Adult Compliance ACT $16,794 $0 $16,794 $0 $16,794 $0 $16,794 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-16-00 Salaries-KUSD School Res Offic $145,362 $0 $145,362 $0 $145,362 $0 $145,362 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-16-01 Other Pay-KUSD School Res Offi $7,537 $0 $7,537 $0 $7,537 $0 $7,537 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-20-00 Part-Time Wages $131,500 ($131,500) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-30-00 Overtime $50,000 ($50,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-35-00 Stand By $2,500 ($2,500) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-36-00 FTO Wages $5,200 ($5,200) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-38-00 Uniform Allowance $28,700 $0 $28,700 $3,584 $23,463 $1,653 $28,700 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 410-40-00 Holiday Pay $61,244 $0 $61,244 $7,648 $50,069 $3,528 $61,244 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-00-00 Fringe Benefits $10,676 $0 $10,676 $1,333 $8,728 $615 $10,676 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-11-00 FICA Tax Expense $174,313 $0 $174,313 $21,767 $142,505 $10,041 $174,313 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-12-00 $28,205 $0 $28,205 $3,522 $23,058 $1,625 $28,205 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-15-00 Fringe Benefits-ACT $35,264 $0 $35,264 $0 $35,264 $0 $35,264 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-16-00 Benefits-KUSD School Res Offic $77,250 $0 $77,250 $0 $77,250 $0 $77,250 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-40-00 Health Insurance Expense $229,500 $0 $229,500 $28,658 $187,622 $13,220 $229,500 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-50-00 Retirement City Contribution $275,765 $0 $275,765 $34,435 $225,445 $15,885 $275,765 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-51-00 CalPERS Unfunded Liability $122,507 $0 $122,507 $15,298 $100,153 $7,057 $122,507 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-55-00 Workers Compensation Expense $180,877 $0 $180,877 $22,586 $147,871 $10,419 $180,877 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 420-60-00 SDI Expense $23,295 $0 $23,295 $2,909 $19,044 $1,342 $23,295 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 500-00-00 Ford Explorer Vehicle Loan Pmt $102,357 $0 $102,357 $102,357 $102,357 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-11-00 Professional Serv-Emp Hiring $12,000 $0 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-12-00 Profess. Serv-Lab Serv-Crime $7,000 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-13-00 Professional Serv-Lab Serv Emp $300 $0 $300 $300 $300 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-14-00 Professional Services-Investig $200 $0 $200 $200 $200 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-17-00 Assault/Medical Examinations $5,000 ($5,000) $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-28-00 Dispatch $244,936 $0 $244,936 $244,936 $244,936 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-29-00 RMS-CAD $2,430 $0 $2,430 $2,430 $2,430 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-30-00 Booking Fees $1,000 ($1,000) $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-31-00 Parking Citations $12,000 ($12,000) $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 510-32-00 Live Scan Fingerprints $4,000 $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 515-01-00 Utilities $20,000 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-01-00 Office Supplies $3,000 $0 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-02-00 General Supplies $7,000 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-07-00 Postage $1,900 $0 $1,900 $1,900 $1,900 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-10-00 Uniform Supplies $5,000 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-12-00 Bullet Resistant Vests $3,500 $0 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 [d] DRAFT Appendix B: p. 46
147
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Police 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-25-00 Evidence and Property $1,800 $0 $1,800 $1,800 $1,800 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-35-00 Firearms Purchase $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-40-00 Range Supplies $6,000 $0 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 521-41-00 Range Maintenance $100 $0 $100 $100 $100 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 530-01-00 Equipment Maintainance Repair $4,000 $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 540-02-00 Equipment Rental - Lease $5,000 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 551-01-00 Communications-Telephone $6,000 $0 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 551-02-00 Communications-Cellular Phone $5,000 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 551-05-00 Live Scan Line $9,000 $0 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 551-06-00 MDT Access $4,000 $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 551-07-00 Communications - City Cameras $1,100 $0 $1,100 $1,100 $1,100 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 552-02-00 Public Notice $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 554-01-00 Travel-Meetings $2,500 $0 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 554-02-00 Training-POST Reimburseable $20,000 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 554-05-00 Training Supplies $900 $0 $900 $900 $900 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 555-02-00 Professional Dues $3,900 $0 $3,900 $3,900 $3,900 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 555-04-00 Prof Serv/Forensic Software Up $4,300 $0 $4,300 $4,300 $4,300 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 555-05-00 Explorer Program $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 555-07-00 Crime Prevention Programs $750 $0 $750 $750 $750 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 555-08-00 Citizens on Patrol Program $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 565-00-00 Internal Service Fund $390,438 $0 $390,438 $390,438 $390,438 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 575-00-00 Employee Education Incentive $5,000 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 580-15-00 ACT Team-Fresno County Reimbur $68,919 ($68,919) $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 580-16-00 Kerman Unified School Res Offi $4,000 ($4,000) $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 600-03-01 Capital Outlay-Ballistic Hlmts $14,000 ($14,000) $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 600-03-03 Capital Outlay-Spike Strips $11,000 ($11,000) $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 600-03-04 Capital Outlay/Technology Equi $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 [d] 100 General Fund 3011 Police 600-03-05 Capital Outlay-Tasers (25) $10,762 ($10,762) $0 $0 $0 [d] Subtotal
DRAFT
$4,384,179 ($315,881) $4,068,298 $1,096,072 $2,809,683 $162,543 $4,068,298 Appendix B: p. 47
148
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Police Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description Total Adjust Total Notes Dept Admin Ops Direct Records
Management Total Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation $425,365 $0 $425,365 [b] >>>>>> $53,116 $347,747 $24,502 $425,365 [d],[e] Total $425,365 $0 $425,365 $53,116 $347,747 $24,502 $425,365 Allocation of Department Admin for Fee Study
Description Total Ops Direct
Records
Management Total Notes
Direct Budget $1,096,072 $1,014,881 $81,191 $1,096,072 [d] Allocation of C'wide OH $53,116 $49,182 $3,935 $53,116 [d] Total $1,149,188 $1,064,063 $85,125 $1,149,188
Total Expenses for Fee Study
Description Ops Direct
Records
Management Total Notes
Direct Budget $2,809,683 $162,543 $2,972,226
Allocation of C'wide OH $347,747 $24,502 $372,249
Allocation of Dept Admin $1,064,063 $85,125 $1,149,188
Total $4,221,493 $272,170 $4,493,663
Annual Hours Per Direct FTE
Description Total Notes
Total Hours Per FTE 2,080
Less: Est Leave Time 240 [f]
Productive Hours 1,840
Direct Ratio 0.85 [g]
Direct Hours 1,564
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate
Description Ops Direct
Records
Management Notes
Expenses $4,221,493 $272,170
FTE 25.00 2.00
Direct Hours 39,100 3,128
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $108 $87
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 48
149
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Community Development - Police Calculation of Estimated Benefit Rate
Description Total Notes
Salaries 410-xx-xx $2,206,435 [a]
Benefits 420-xx-xx $1,157,653 [a]
Benefit Rate 52%
Calculation of Rate for Special Requests for Police Services (e.g., Special Event Support / DUI Collision Cost Recovery) Non-OT Overtime
Description Top Step Per Year Hours Per Year
Salary & Wage
Rate Per Hour
Benefit Rate
Per Hour Total
OT Salary &
Wage
Benefit Rate
Per Hour Total Notes
Records Clerk $4,228 $50,736 $2,080 $24 $13 $37 $37 $13 $49 [b] Records Manager $5,978 $71,736 $2,080 $34 $18 $53 $52 $18 $70 [b] Community Services Officer $3,651 $43,812 $2,080 $21 $11 $32 $32 $11 $43 [b] Police Officer $5,445 $65,340 $2,184 $30 $16 $46 $45 $16 $61 [b] Police Corporal $5,978 $71,736 $2,184 $33 $17 $50 $49 $17 $67 [b] Police Sergeant $7,162 $85,944 $2,184 $39 $21 $60 $59 $21 $80 [b] Police Lieutenant $8,415 $100,980 $2,080 $49 $25 $74 $73 $25 $98 [b] [a] Source: FY 21/22 Adopted Budget
[b] Source: Adopted City Salary Schedules
[c] FTE allocation for purposes of this analysis only.
[d] Expense allocation for purposes of this analysis only. [e] Source: Citywide overhead cost allocation developed for purposes of this analysis. See separate worksheet for details. [f] Typical leave assumes 13 holidays, 10 days vacation, 5 days sick, 2 days personal leave per employee. Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates. [g] Adjustmet to exclude general administration and management, training, code, policies and procedures updates, etc.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 49
150
Section 7, Item A.

1 Fingerprinting fee
a) Live Scan Rolling Fee 0.33 0.33 x $0 $29 = $29 $20 69% $25 86% b) Live Scan FBI Clearance $19 $19 [a]
c) Live Scan DOJ Clearance $32 $32 [a]
2 Fingerprinting fee - Hard Copy
a) First Card 0.33 0.33 x $36 $0 = $36 $10 28% $25 69%
b) Each Additional Card 0.08 0.08 x $9 $0 = $9 $5 56% $5 56% 3 Records Check (e.g., Local Criminal History Check;
Clearance Letter)

0.50 0.50 x $0 $44 = $44 $15 34% $25 57%
4 Report Copy
a) Traffic Collision Report 0.33 0.33 x $0 $29 = $29 $12 41% $15 52% b) Police Report 0.33 0.33 x $0 $29 = $29 $12 41% $15 52% 5 Citation Sign-Offs
a) Residents 0.33 0.33 x $36 $0 = $36 Free 0% Free 0% [b] b) Non-Residents 0.33 0.33 x $36 $0 = $36 $5 14% $10 28% [b] 6 Vehicle Release 1.25 0.50 1.75 x $135 $44 = $179 $60 - $125 35% - 72% $150 84% a) Expired Registration 1.25 0.50 1.75 x $135 $44 = $179 $60 34% $150 84% b) No License or Suspended or Revoked 1.25 0.50 1.75 x $135 $44 = $179 $75 42% $150 84% c) Driving Under the Influence (DUI) 1.25 0.50 1.75 x $135 $44 = $179 $125 70% $150 84% 7 Repossessed Vehicle Fee $15 $15 n/a [c]
8 Property Storage Fee (per item/weapon) 0.33 0.08
DRAFT

0.42 x $36 $7 = $43 $30 69%
Appendix B: p. 50
151
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Police Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Hourly Rate $108 $87
Fee Description Ops
Support
Svcs Total Ops
Support
Svcs
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Notes
9 False Alarm Response (Per Calendar Year)
a) First 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 No Charge 0%
b) Second 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 No Charge 0%
c) Third 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 $50 22%
d) Fourth 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 $100 50%
e) Fifth and Each Additional 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 $150 79% 10 Noise Disturbance (Per Calendar Year)
a) First 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 No Charge 0%
b) Second 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 No Charge 0%
c) Third 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 $50 22%
d) Fourth 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 $100 50%
e) Fifth and Each Additional 0.50 0.25 0.75 x $54 $22 = $76 $150 79% 11 DUI Collision Cost Recovery (per hour)
a) Non-Overtime
i) Records Clerk 1.00 1.00 x $37 $0 = $37 $37 100%
ii) Records Manager 1.00 1.00 x $53 $0 = $53 $53 100%
iii) Community Services Officer 1.00 1.00 x $32 $0 = $32 $32 100% iv) Police Officer 1.00 1.00 x $46 $0 = $46 $46 100%
v) Police Corporal 1.00 1.00 x $50 $0 = $50 $50 100%
vi) Police Sergeant 1.00 1.00 x $60 $0 = $60 $60 100%
vii) Police Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 x $74 $0 = $74 $74 100% b) Overtime
i) Records Clerk 1.00 1.00 x $49 $0 = $49 $49 100%
ii) Records Manager 1.00 1.00 x $70 $0 = $70 $70 100%
iii) Community Services Officer 1.00 1.00 x $43 $0 = $43 $43 100% iv) Police Officer 1.00 1.00 x $61 $0 = $61 $61 100%
v) Police Corporal 1.00 1.00 x $67 $0 = $67 $67 100%
vi) Police Sergeant 1.00 1.00 x $80 $0 = $80 $80 100%
vii) Police Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 x $98 $0 = $98 $98 100% DRAFT Appendix B: p. 51
152
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Police Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Hourly Rate $108 $87
Fee Description Ops
Support
Svcs Total Ops
Support
Svcs
Est. Cost
of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Notes
12 Special Requests for Police Services (per hour)
a) Non-Overtime
i) Records Clerk 1.00 1.00 x $37 $0 = $37 $37 100%
ii) Records Manager 1.00 1.00 x $53 $0 = $53 $53 100%
iii) Community Services Officer 1.00 1.00 x $32 $0 = $32 $32 100% iv) Police Officer 1.00 1.00 x $46 $0 = $46 $46 100%
v) Police Corporal 1.00 1.00 x $50 $0 = $50 $50 100%
vi) Police Sergeant 1.00 1.00 x $60 $0 = $60 $60 100%
vii) Police Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 x $74 $0 = $74 $74 100% b) Overtime
i) Records Clerk 1.00 1.00 x $49 $0 = $49 $49 100%
ii) Records Manager 1.00 1.00 x $70 $0 = $70 $70 100%
iii) Community Services Officer 1.00 1.00 x $43 $0 = $43 $43 100% iv) Police Officer 1.00 1.00 x $61 $0 = $61 $61 100%
v) Police Corporal 1.00 1.00 x $67 $0 = $67 $67 100%
vi) Police Sergeant 1.00 1.00 x $80 $0 = $80 $80 100%
vii) Police Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 x $98 $0 = $98 $98 100% 13 Subpoena Response / Court Appearance Maximum Amount
Allowed by Law
14 VIN Verification $5 $5
[a] Amounts established by other agencies. In the case of discrepancies, amounts adopted by other agencies (e.g., DOJ, FBI) shall supersede this schedule. [b] Signoffs are processed for Kerman residents or citations issued by Kerman Police Department. [c] Government Code 41612.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 52
153
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Public Works Fees
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 53
154
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Cost of Service Calculation - Public Works Encroachment Permit Fees Description
Fully-Burdened
Hourly Rate Allocation Notes
Contract Share $100 65% [a]
City Share $54 35% [a]
Hourly Rate $154 100%
Notes:
[a] Source: Hourly rates and allocations based on current industry contract service rates and contract service/agency allocations.

Amount is intended to serve as a reasonable estimate.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 54
155
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Public Works Utility Fees Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc 21/22 Budget Adjust Total Notes 410 Water 4041 Water Ops 4xx-xx-xx Personnel $542,018 $0 $542,018 420 Sewer 4042 Sewer Ops 4xx-xx-xx Personnel $473,890 $0 $473,890 470 Storm Drain 4047 Storm Drain 4xx-xx-xx Personnel $78,888 $0 $78,888 Subtotal $1,094,796 $0 $1,094,796
Allocation of Citywide Overhead
Description
Modified
Expenses
C'Wide OH
Rate Total Notes
Citywide Overhead Allocation $1,094,796 35% $383,179 [b] Total $1,094,796 $383,179
Allocation of Total Costs
Description Total Notes
Direct Budget Expenses $1,094,796
Allocation of Citywide Overhead $383,179
Total $1,477,975
Allocation of Annual Labor Effort
Description Total Total Notes
General Admin; Mgmt; Policies; Procedures 23% $339,934 [c] Certification and Training 2% $29,559 [c]
Public Information and Assistance 5% $73,899 [c]
Direct Services 70% $1,034,582 [c]
Total 100% $1,477,975
Annual Hours Per Direct FTE
Description Total Notes
Total Hours Per FTE 2,080
Less: Est Leave Time 240 [d]
Productive Hours 1,840
Direct Ratio 0.70 [c]
Direct Hours 1,288
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 55
156
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Study
Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate - Public Works Utility Fees Recurring Expenditures [a]
Fund # Fund Desc Div# Div Desc Acct # Acct Desc 21/22 Budget Adjust Total Notes Calculation of Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate
Description Total Notes
Expenses $1,477,975
FTE 11.66 [e]
Direct Hours 15,018
Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate $98
[a] Source: FY 21/22 Adopted Budget
[b] Amount intended to serve as reasonable estimate.
[c] Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates of direct activities v. indirect support to direct activities. [d] Typical leave assumes 13 holidays, 10 days vacation, 5 days sick, 2 days personal leave per employee. Amounts intended to serve as reasonable estimates. [e] Source: FY 21/22 Adopted Budget, page 132
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 56
157
Section 7, Item A.

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PROCESSING
(Fees include plan check, permit issuance, and inspection fees)

1 Utility Service Providers - Connection / Service / Repair up to 100 SF 2.00 x $154 = $308 97% $300 Fixed Fee 2 Catch Basin / Dry Well / Manhole / Vault / Concrete Pads / Pole Set or Removal (per location)

2.00 x $154 = $308 97% $300 Fixed Fee
3 Trenching/Excavation for Infrastructure Installation
a) Bell Hole
i) Application Review Fee 1.50 x $154 = $231 97% $225 Fixed Fee ii) Permit and Inspection Fee (Greater of A or B)
a) Minimum fee per location 3.00 x $154 = $462 97% $450 Fixed Fee b) Fee per bore / pit / pothole 1.00 x $154 = $154 97% $150 Fixed Fee b) Street / Trench Cut
i) Application Review Fee 1.50 x $154 = $231 97% $225 Fixed Fee ii) Permit and Inspection Fee (Greater of A or B)
a) Minimum fee per location 3.00 x $154 = $462 97% $450 Fixed Fee b) Fee Per 100 SF 1.00 x $154 = $154 97% $150 Fixed Fee 4 Driveway
a) Residential
i) First Approach 3.00 x $154 = $462 65% $300 Fixed Fee ii) Each Additional Approach 1.50 x $154 = $231 65% $150 Fixed Fee b) Commercial
i) First Approach 4.00 x $154 = $616 97% $600 Fixed Fee ii) Each Additional Approach 2.00 x $154 = $308 97% $300 Fixed Fee 5 Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk
a) Residential 3.00 x $154 = $462 65% $300 Fixed Fee [a] b) Commercial 4.00 x $154 = $616 97% $600 Fixed Fee [a] 6 Other General Temporary Encroachment Permit [b]
a) For Work Expected to Last No More than Two Weeks [b] i) Base Fee - Up to Two Days 2.50 x $154 = $385 97% $375 Fixed Fee ii) Each Additional Day 1.00 x $154 = $154 97% $150 Fixed Fee b) For Work Expected to Last More than Two Weeks Deposit 100% $1,500 $1,500 Deposit with Minimum Fee
[b]
7 Agreement for Private Improvements In the Right-of-Way (Permanent Encroachment)

3.50 x $154 = $539 97% $525 Fixed Fee
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 57
158
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
Public Works Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. Labor Hrs
OR Min. Labor
Hrs
Hourly
Rate Cost of Service Current Fee
Current
Cost
Recovery
Targeted
Cost
Recovery
Fixed Fee /
Minimum Fee Deposit
Proposed Fee
Structure Note
OTHER
8 Extension of Time (per extension, if not separately charged against deposit) 1.00 x $154 = $154 97% $150 Fixed Fee 9 Plan Revision (per revision, if not separately charged against deposit) 0.50 x $154 = $77 97% $75 Fixed Fee 10 Excess Plan Review (per hour, if not separately charged against deposit) 1.00 x $154 = $154 97% $150 Fixed Fee 11 Hourly Rate for Services Not Identified in this Schedule, Other Inspection, Missed/Excess Inspections, Re-inspection Fee

a) In-House Engineering / PW Staff 1.00 x $154 = $154 97% $150 Per Hour b) Contract Service Support Time & Mat'ls
+ 15%
Fixed Fee
c) Attorney / Other Professional Services Time & Mat'ls Fixed Fee 12 Failure to Restore Public Improvements as Required (per day) $150 Per Day 13 Commencing Work Without a Permit or Work Different than Authorized by Permit
2x fees Double fees
Note: Deposit amounts listed are typical minimum amounts. The City reserves the right to request a different deposit (lower or higher) based on complexity of project or frequency of inspections needed.
[a] For combination driveway, curb, gutter, sidewalk permits to be inspected at same time, only use driveway permit for fee calculation. [b] General encroachment work includes any activity within the public right of way. Fixed fee permit applies to typical utility work with standard WATCH manual traffic control. More complex work requiring additional plan check/traffic control, plan review, testing, and/or inspection, requires a deposit.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 58
159
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
Engineering Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Cost of
Service Current Fee
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Charge Basis Note
1 Water - Miscellaneous
a) Meter Testing 1.00 x $98 = $98 $75 77% [a]
b) Cut Lock Fee 1.00 x $98 = $98 $75 77%
2 Water Waste Fines
a) Informational Notification No Charge
b) 1st Written Water Waste Notice No Charge
c) 2nd Written Water Waste Notice $25
d) 3rd Written Water Waste Notice $50
e) 4th Written Water Waste Notice $100
f) 5th Written Water Waste Notice $200
g) Subsequent Written Water Waste Notice Disconnection
3 Septic Tank Waste Disposal (cost per gallon)
a) From Septic Tank Waste Within City Limits $0.10
b) From Septic Tank Waste Outside City Limits $0.20
[a] Test amount refundable if meter reading is found to be inaccurate.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 59
160
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
Engineering Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Cost of
Service Current Fee Current Deposit
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee Proposed Deposit
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Charge Basis Note
1 Construction Water Meter 2.00 x $98 = $196 $150; plus the cost of total water usage per
month
$1,250 Each [a]
[a] See current utility rates for cost of water.

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 60
161
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
Engineering Fees
Cost of Service Calculation - At Fully-Burdened Hourly Rate Fee Description
Est. Labor
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Cost of
Service Current Fee
Cost
Recovery Proposed Fee
Proposed
Cost
Recovery Charge Basis Note
1 Dirt Purchase 0.50 x $98 = $49 $40 plus $0.75
per CY
$45
plus $1 per CY
per request
2 Debris Clean-Up 1.00 x $98 = $98 $98 100% per hour; 2-hour minimum 3 Grafitti Clean-Up 1.00 x $98 = $98 $98 100% per hour; 2-hour minimum 4 Emergency Residential Tree-Trimming 1.00 x $98 = $98 $98 100% per hour; 2-hour minimum 5 Rates for Services Not Listed Above
a) PW Encroachment Review 1.00 x $154 = $154 $150 97% per hour; 1-hour minimum b) PW Utility Customer Service and City Maintenance Services 1.00 x $98 = $98 $98 100% per hour; 1-hour minimum DRAFT Appendix B: p. 61
162
Section 7, Item A.

Cost of Service Analysis
Citywide Overhead Cost Allocation
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 62
163
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Analysis
Estimated Citywide Overhead (for Cost of Service Calculation Purposes Only) Central Service Center - General Fund Allocation [a]
Fund Div Description Personnel M&O Subtotal
Debt Service &
Capital Total Adjustment
Amount for
Overhead Cost
Allocation
Calculation Indirect Direct Total Notes
100 6001 City Council $16,909 $17,240 $34,149 $0 $34,149 $0 $34,149 $34,149 $0 $34,149 100 6003 City Attorney $0 $130,000 $130,000 $0 $130,000 $0 $130,000 $130,000 $0 $130,000 100 1002 City Manager $217,559 $359,275 $576,834 $14,286 $591,120 ($14,286) $576,834 $576,834 $0 $576,834 [b] 100 5005 Administrative Services $44,752 $62,918 $107,670 $3,571 $111,241 ($3,571) $107,670 $107,670 $0 $107,670 [b] 100 5006 Debt Service to DIF $0 $0 $0 $95,339 $95,339 ($95,339) $0 $0 $0 $0 [b] 100 6004 City Clerk $39,721 $78,018 $117,739 $14,286 $132,025 ($14,286) $117,739 $72,739 $45,000 $117,739 [c] 100 7001 Measure M $28,238 $1,465,481 $1,493,719 $4,583,685 $6,077,404 ($5,005,435) $1,071,969 $0 $1,071,969 $1,071,969 [b],[d] 100 1008 Planning $186,450 $77,253 $263,703 $7,143 $270,846 ($7,143) $263,703 $0 $263,703 $263,703 [b] 100 1010 Engineering $0 $101,500 $101,500 $0 $101,500 $0 $101,500 $0 $101,500 $101,500 [b] 100 1042 Building $86,224 $183,642 $269,866 $7,143 $277,009 ($7,143) $269,866 $0 $269,866 $269,866 [b] 100 2002 Rec & Comm Svcs Admin $166,839 $39,930 $206,769 $2,857 $209,626 ($2,857) $206,769 $0 $206,769 $206,769 [b] 100 2010 Building Maintenance $452,790 $101,165 $553,955 $1,429 $555,384 ($1,429) $553,955 $553,955 $0 $553,955 [b] 100 2044 Senior Center Svcs $126,860 $20,292 $147,152 $2,857 $150,009 ($2,857) $147,152 $0 $147,152 $147,152 [b] 100 2047 Aquatics Program $62,541 $16,340 $78,881 $1,429 $80,310 ($1,429) $78,881 $0 $78,881 $78,881 [b] 100 2062 Planned Recreation $54,587 $10,230 $64,817 $1,429 $66,246 ($1,429) $64,817 $0 $64,817 $64,817 [b] 100 2065 Youth and Teen Services $79,044 $9,172 $88,216 $1,429 $89,645 ($1,429) $88,216 $0 $88,216 $88,216 [b] 100 2069 Community Teen Center $108,610 $60,073 $168,683 $1,429 $170,112 ($1,429) $168,683 $0 $168,683 $168,683 [b] 100 3011 Police Operations $2,873,035 $956,775 $3,829,810 $43,757 $3,873,567 ($43,757) $3,829,810 $0 $3,829,810 $3,829,810 [b] 100 3015 ACT Grant $101,826 $13,456 $115,282 $0 $115,282 $0 $115,282 $0 $115,282 $115,282 100 3016 SRO Grant $181,941 $4,000 $185,941 $0 $185,941 $0 $185,941 $0 $185,941 $185,941 100 3050 SLESF Grant $100,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 100 3999 Safety Grants, Contracts, & Projects $104,934 $6,400 $111,334 $4,000 $115,334 ($4,000) $111,334 $0 $111,334 $111,334 [b] 100 3041 Animal Control $43,514 $41,920 $85,434 $1,429 $86,863 ($1,429) $85,434 $0 $85,434 $85,434 [b] 100 4010 Park Landscape Maintenance $115,762 $83,329 $199,091 $4,429 $203,520 ($4,429) $199,091 $0 $199,091 $199,091 [b] Total $5,192,136 $3,838,409 $9,030,545 $4,791,927 $13,822,472 ($5,213,677) $8,608,795 $1,475,347 $7,133,448 $8,608,795 Citywide Overhead Cost Rate
Description Operating Exp Notes
Indirect Costs $1,475,347
Modified Direct Costs $7,133,448
Total 21%
DRAFT Appendix B: p. 63
164
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
User and Regulatory Fee Analysis
Estimated Citywide Overhead (for Cost of Service Calculation Purposes Only) Allocation of Citywide Overhead Costs to Direct Service Departments / Primary Budgetary Units Description
Allocation
Metric
Share of
Overhead
Allocation Allocation Notes
Community Development 1 33% $491,782
Community Services 1 33% $491,782
Police 1 33% $491,782
Total 3 100% $1,475,347
Allocation of Citywide Overhead Costs to Community Development Divisions - Based on Modified Direct Costs of Departments Description
Allocation
Metric
Share of
Overhead
Allocation Allocation Notes
Planning 263,703 42% $204,205
Engineering 101,500 16% $78,599
Building 269,866 42% $208,978
Total $635,069 100% $491,782
Allocation of Citywide Overhead Costs to Police Divisions - Based on Modified Direct Costs of Departments Description
Allocation
Metric
Share of
Overhead
Allocation Allocation Notes
Police Operations 3,829,810 86% $425,365
ACT Grant 115,282 3% $12,804
SRO Grant 185,941 4% $20,652
SLESF Grant 100,000 2% $11,107
Safety Grants, Contracts, & Projects 111,334 3% $12,366 Animal Control 85,434 2% $9,489
Total $4,427,801 100% $491,782
[a] Source: FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget.
[b] Adjustment to exclude non-recurring capital expenditures and debt service. [c] Direct costs are for Code Enforcement contract services costs included in City Clerk budget. [d] Adjustment to exclude Downtown Revitilization Program costs (account 600 xx).

DRAFT Appendix B: p. 64
165
Section 7, Item A.

CLEARSOURCE REPORT TO CITY OF KERMAN

APPENDIX C

SCHEDULE OF CURRENT FEES AND PROPOSED FEES
Note: Significant changes are proposed to the overall structure of building fees making a comparison of current and proposed fees impractical. Proposed building fees and the associated costs of service are included in Appendices A and B of this report.

DRAFT
166
Section 7, Item A.

Illustration of Current Fees and Proposed Fees
DRAFT
167
Section 7, Item A.

FEE SCHEDULE PAGE
Administrative Fees 1
Animal Licensing and Regulation Fees 2
Engineering Improvement Review and Grading Plan Review Fees 3 Planning Fees 5
Police Fees 9
Public Works Fees 11
Recreation and Facility Rental Fees 16
Table of Contents
Note: This Fee Schedule does not include all fees, rates, or charges that may be imposed by the City.

Examples of excluded items include, but are not limited to,development impact fees, utility rates, and punitive fines and penalties.

DRAFT
168
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - FINANCE & BUSINESS LICENSE FEES Current Fee Proposed Fee Increase/(Decrease) Charge Basis 1 Business License Application Review Fee
a) Physical Location within City Limits (Including Home Occupation) $129 $150 $21 Each b) Business Located Outside City Limits and Contractors without Physical Location within City Limits
varies $75 Each
2 Returned Check Fee; ACH/EFT Return/Error $25 Each
3 Charitable Solicitation Car Wash Permit Fee $10 $20 $10 Each 4 Utility Proof of Residency / Credit Reference Letter n/a $10 Each 5 Utility Billing Account History Report n/a $10 Each
6 Fireworks Permit $40 $50 $10 Per permit
7 Yard Sale Permit Fee $5 $10 $5 Per permit
Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 1
169
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - ANIMAL CONTROL FEES
Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Note
Dog License Fees Current Cost
1 Spayed or Neutered Dog Recovery for
a) One Year Option $5 Department is $15
b) Two Year Option $6 3% $20
c) Three Year Option $10 $30
2 Nonspayed or Unneutered Dog
a) One Year Option $17 $30
b) Two Year Option $30 $40
c) Three Year Option $40 $60
3 Delinquent Penalty $25
4 Lost Tag Replacement $5
5 Service Dog License $0
Impound Fees
6 Licensed Animal
a) First Impound $25
b) Second Impound $50
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $75
7 Unlicensed Animal
a) First Impound $50
b) Second Impound $100
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $150
8 Dangerous Animals
a) First Impound $100
b) Second Impound $200
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $300
9 Impound Fine for Nonspayed or Unneutered Animal
a) First Impound $35 [a]
b) Second Impound $50 [a]
c) Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $100 [a]
10 Care and Feeding Per Day
a) Up to 100 lbs $15
b) Over 100 lbs $25
Owner Surrender Animals (Living or Dead)
11 Delivered to Shelter $25
12 Picked Up by Animal Control $50
[a] Food and Agriculture Code Sections 30804.7 and 31751.7. These amounts are in addition to impound fees.

Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 2
170
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman
BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - GRADING FEES *
Current Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Grading Plan Check
a) Parcels under 1 acre over 50 CY varies $1,552 deposit [a] b) 1.00 - 5.00 acres
i) First acre varies $1,552 deposit [a]
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof up to 5 acres varies $194 deposit [a] c) 5.01 - 10.00 acres
i) First 5.01 acres varies $2,328 deposit [a]
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof up to 10 acres varies $194 deposit [a] d) Over 10 acres
i) First 10.01 acres varies $3,298 deposit [a]
ii) Each additional acre, or portion thereof varies $146 deposit [a] 2 Permit Issuance - Onsite Construction / Grading varies $97 3 Extension of Time varies $97
4 Fee for Additional Services Required Due to Changes, Modifications, Additions, etc. Actual Costs / T&M plus 15% admin fee
5 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff varies $194 Per Hour
b) Contract Service Providers varies Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 15% admin fee
deposit
[a] Amount shown is initial deposit.

Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 3
171
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW FEES Current Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial Deposit /
Minimum Fee Charge Basis Note
1 Subdivision Map Engineering Plan Check & Inspection
Cost of Improvements
a) First $50,000 7.00% 10.00% % of Eng. Estimate [a]
b) $50,001 to $300,000 5.50% 6.00% % of Eng. Estimate [a] c) $300,001 to $700,000 4.00% 4.00% % of Eng. Estimate [a] d) Greater than $700,000 2.50% 2.50% % of Eng. Estimate [a] 2 Fee for Additional Services Required Due to Changes, Modifications, Additions, etc. Actual Costs / T&M plus 15% admin fee
3 Fees for Services Not Listed In this Fee Schedule
a) Hourly Rate of In-House Staff varies $194 Per Hour
b) Contract Service Providers varies Pass-through of Consultant Costs plus 15% admin fee
Activity Description
[a] Estimate of 25% of fee due at initial submittal. Amount shown is intended to serve as a reasonable estimate, however the City reserves the right to collect additional fees for work outside of typical scope. Fees are additive (e.g., For $75,000 of improvements the fee is calculated as follows: For the first $50,000 of improvements fee is 10% of engineer's cost estimate. For the next $25,000 of improvements the fee is 6% of engineer's cost estimate).

DRAFT Appendix C: p. 4
172
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Current Fee
Proposed Fixed Fee or
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial
Deposit
Proposed Cost
Recovery Charge Basis Note
Appeal
1 Appeal
a) Applicant Requested $300 - $340 $1,000 26% Per Appeal b) Non-Applicant Requested $300 - $340 $2,850 75% Per Appeal Annexation
2 Annexation $2,000 $10,000 $10,000 100% Deposit with Minimum Fee [a] Use Permit
3 Administrative Use Permit n/a $1,890 50% Fixed Fee [b] 4 Conditional Use Permit
a) CUP - Minor - No New Construction $500 $2,835 75% Fixed Fee [b] b) CUP - Major - New Construction $1,300 $5,670 75% Fixed Fee [b] c) CUP - Alcohol with PCN Consideration n/a Base CUP fee plus 25% 75% Fixed Fee [b] d) CUP - Amendment $450 50% of current equivalent fee 75% Fixed Fee [b] e) CUP - Extension $150 $425 75% Fixed Fee [b]
5 Temporary Use Permit
a) Temporary Use Permit (First Time Applicant) $180 $319 75% Fixed Fee [b] b) Temporary Use Permit (Reccurring Annual Event) $180 $142 75% Fixed Fee [b] Environmental
6 Categorical Exemption Review $100 $189 25% Fixed Fee
7 Recordation of Notice of Determination n/a $189 67% Fixed Fee 8 Negative Declaration Cost + 15% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial deposit
9 Mitigated Negative Declaration Cost + 15% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial deposit
10 Environmental Impact Report Cost + 15% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial deposit
General Plan Amendment / Specific Plan
11 General Plan Amendment $1,500 $7,500 $7,500 100% Deposit with Minimum Fee 12 Specific Plan
a) Specific Plan Cost + 15% pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
$10,000 100% T&M with initial deposit
b) Specific Plan Amendment 50% of cost of
specific plan
pass-through actual costs plus
15% city admin fee
$5,000 100% T&M with initial deposit
Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 5
173
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Current Fee
Proposed Fixed Fee or
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial
Deposit
Proposed Cost
Activity Description Recovery Charge Basis Note
Site Plan
13 Site Plan Review
a) Non-Residential
i) Less than 1,200 sq. ft. (New Construction or Site Modification) $500 - $1,400 $1,890 50% Fixed Fee [b] ii) +1,201 sq. ft. - 15,000 sq. ft. (Minor Construction) $500 - $1,400 $7,088 75% Fixed Fee [b] iii) +15,001 sq. ft. (Major Construction) $500 - $1,400 $11,340 100% Fixed Fee [b] b) Residential
i) 1-4 Multi-Family Units $500 - $1,400 $1,890 50% Fixed Fee [b] ii) 5-40 Multi-Family Units $500 - $1,400 $7,088 75% Fixed Fee [b] iii) +41 Multi-Family Units $500 - $1,400 $11,340 100% Fixed Fee [b] c) Site Plan Review - Amendment 50% of current equivalent fee [b] d) Site Plan Review - Extension $150 $425 75% Fixed Fee [b] Subdivisions
14 Lot Line Adjustment $350 $1,134 75% Fixed Fee
15 Parcel Merger $350 $1,134 75% Fixed Fee
16 Parcel Map Waiver $500 $1,134 75% Fixed Fee
17 Certificate of Correction / Certificate of Compliance varies $567 75% Fixed Fee 18 Tentative Parcel Map (4 lots or less) $900 $2,268 50% Fixed Fee 19 Tentative Parcel Map - Amendment $355 $756 50% Fixed Fee 20 Tentative Parcel Map - Extension $270 $425 75% Fixed Fee 21 Tentative Subdivision Map (5 lots or more)
a) 100 Lots or Less $2,000 plus $26/lot $5,670 75% Fixed Fee b) More than 100 Lots
i) Base Fee for the first 100 Lots $2,000 plus $26/lot $5,670 75% Fixed Fee ii) Per Lot Fee for each additional lot $26 $24 75% Fixed Fee 22 Tentative Subdivision Map - Amendment $900 $2,268 75% Fixed Fee 23 Tentative Subdivision Map - Extension $320 $425 75% Fixed Fee 24 Final Parcel Map (4 lots or less) $800 $1,134 50% Fixed Fee DRAFT Appendix C: p. 6
174
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Current Fee
Proposed Fixed Fee or
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial
Deposit
Proposed Cost
Activity Description Recovery Charge Basis Note
25 Final Subdivision / Tract Map (5 lots or more)
a) 100 Lots or Less $1,808 plus $26/lot $2,835 75% Fixed Fee b) More than 100 Lots
i) Base Fee for the first 100 Lots $1,808 plus $26/lot $2,835 75% Fixed Fee ii) Per Lot Fee for each additional lot $26 $12 75% Fixed Fee 26 Planned /Smart Zone Development Plan Review $1,800 $4,725 50% Fixed Fee 27 Developer Agreement Preparation $1,259 $7,500 $7,500 100% Deposit with Minimum Fee Zoning
28 Rezone/Prezone $1,300 $7,500 $7,500 100% Deposit with Minimum Fee 29 Ordinance Text Amendment $575 $5,000 $5,000 100% Deposit with Minimum Fee 30 Variance Review $1,000 $2,835 75% Fixed Fee
31 Minor Deviation $100 $333 50% Fixed Fee
32 Density Bonus $715 $2,835 50% Fixed Fee
33 Classification of Use $215 $1,512 50% Fixed Fee
34 Zoning Clearance Letter
a) Basic Property Information $35 $95 50% Fixed Fee
b) Basic Property Information with Additional Research Required $35 $375 50% Fixed Fee Signs
35 Temporary Sign Permit $25 No Charge 0% Fixed Fee
36 Tenant Specific Sign Permit $75 $331 50% Fixed Fee
37 Master Sign Program $150 $1,418 50% Fixed Fee
Miscellaneous
38 Address Adjustment n/a $284 100% Fixed Fee
39 ADU / JADU Plan Review $200 $151 10% Fixed Fee
40 Removal of Deed Restriction on Real Property $189 50% Fixed Fee 41 Fire Plan Review determined by Fire District /
CIty MOU and/or Fire District
Fee Schedule
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 7
175
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - PLANNING FEES
Current Fee
Proposed Fixed Fee or
Minimum Fee
Proposed Initial
Deposit
Proposed Cost
Activity Description Recovery Charge Basis Note
Rate for Services Not Listed Above
42 Rate for Services Not Listed Above
a) Planning $189 100% Per Hour
b) Contract Environmental Review, Planning, Peer Review, etc. pass-through actual costs plus 15% city admin fee
100%
c) Specialized Attorney Review pass-through actual costs 100% d) Outside Agency Costs (e.g. Fire, other Governments) pass-through actual costs 100% [a] Amount shown is City fee only. Additional fees may apply for LAFCO, Department of Fish & Wildlife, County, etc..

Note: In addition to amounts shown above, applicant is responsible for any amounts due to outside agencies (e.g., LAFCO, Department of Fish & Wildlife, County). [b] For applications received that include concurrent site plan review and use permit review, applicant shall pay 100% of the highest applicable review fee (use permit or site plan review fee) and 75% of the lower fee. Example: If concurrent application is received and base stand-alone fees are $5,670 for use permit and $7,088 for site plan review, the modified fee would be 100% of $7,088, plus 75% of $5,670.

DRAFT Appendix C: p. 8
176
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - POLICE FEES
Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Note
1 Fingerprinting fee
a) Live Scan Rolling Fee $20 $29 $25
b) Live Scan FBI Clearance $19 $19 [a]
c) Live Scan DOJ Clearance $32 $32 [a]
2 Fingerprinting fee - Hard Copy
a) First Card $10 $36 $25
b) Each Additional Card $5 $9 $5
3 Records Check (e.g., Local Criminal History Check; Clearance Letter) $15 $44 $25 4 Report Copy
a) Traffic Collision Report $12 $29 $15
b) Police Report $12 $29 $15
5 Citation Sign-Offs
a) Residents Free $36 Free [b]
b) Non-Residents $5 $36 $10 [b]
6 Vehicle Release $60 - $125 $179 $150
7 Repossessed Vehicle Fee $15 $15 [c]
8 Property Storage Fee (per item/weapon) $43 $30
9 False Alarm Response (Per Calendar Year)
a) First $76 No Charge
b) Second $76 No Charge
c) Third $76 $50
d) Fourth $76 $100
e) Fifth and Each Additional $76 $150
10 Noise Disturbance (Per Calendar Year)
a) First $76 No Charge
b) Second $76 No Charge
c) Third $76 $50
d) Fourth $76 $100
e) Fifth and Each Additional $76 $150
Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 9
177
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - POLICE FEES
Activity Description Current Fee Cost of Service Proposed Fee Note 11 DUI Collision Cost Recovery (per hour)
a) Non-Overtime
i) Records Clerk $37 $37
ii) Records Manager $53 $53
iii) Community Services Officer $32 $32
iv) Police Officer $46 $46
v) Police Corporal $50 $50
vi) Police Sergeant $60 $60
vii) Police Lieutenant $74 $74
b) Overtime
i) Records Clerk $49 $49
ii) Records Manager $70 $70
iii) Community Services Officer $43 $43
iv) Police Officer $61 $61
v) Police Corporal $67 $67
vi) Police Sergeant $80 $80
vii) Police Lieutenant $98 $98
12 Special Requests for Police Services (per hour)
a) Non-Overtime
i) Records Clerk $37 $37
ii) Records Manager $53 $53
iii) Community Services Officer $32 $32
iv) Police Officer $46 $46
v) Police Corporal $50 $50
vi) Police Sergeant $60 $60
vii) Police Lieutenant $74 $74
b) Overtime
i) Records Clerk $49 $49
ii) Records Manager $70 $70
iii) Community Services Officer $43 $43
iv) Police Officer $61 $61
v) Police Corporal $67 $67
vi) Police Sergeant $80 $80
vii) Police Lieutenant $98 $98
13 Subpoena Response / Court Appearance Maximum Amount Allowed by Law
[a] Amounts established by other agencies. In the case of discrepancies, amounts adopted by other agencies (e.g., DOJ, FBI) shall supersede this schedule. [b] Signoffs are processed for Kerman residents or citations issued by Kerman Police Department.

DRAFT Appendix C: p. 10
178
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Proposed Initial
Deposit Fee Structure Increase / (Decrease) Note

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PROCESSING
(Fees include plan check, permit issuance, and inspection fees) $59
1 Utility Service Providers - Connection / Service / Repair up to 100 SF $300 Fixed Fee 2 Catch Basin / Dry Well / Manhole / Vault / Concrete Pads / Pole Set or Removal (per location)
$300 Fixed Fee
3 Trenching/Excavation for Infrastructure Installation
a) Bell Hole
i) Application Review Fee $225 Fixed Fee
ii) Permit and Inspection Fee (Greater of A or B)
a) Minimum fee per location $450 Fixed Fee
b) Fee per bore / pit / pothole $150 Fixed Fee
b) Street / Trench Cut
i) Application Review Fee $225 Fixed Fee
ii) Permit and Inspection Fee (Greater of A or B)
a) Minimum fee per location $450 Fixed Fee
b) Fee Per 100 SF $150 Fixed Fee
4 Driveway
a) Residential
i) First Approach $300 Fixed Fee
ii) Each Additional Approach $150 Fixed Fee
b) Commercial
i) First Approach $600 Fixed Fee
ii) Each Additional Approach $300 Fixed Fee
5 Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk
a) Residential $300 Fixed Fee [a]
b) Commercial $600 Fixed Fee [a]
6 Other General Temporary Encroachment Permit [b]
a) For Work Expected to Last No More than Two Weeks [b] i) Base Fee - Up to Two Days $375 Fixed Fee
ii) Each Additional Day $150 Fixed Fee
b) For Work Expected to Last More than Two Weeks $1,500 $1,500 Deposit with Minimum Fee
[b]
7 Agreement for Private Improvements In the Right-of-Way (Permanent Encroachment)
$525 Fixed Fee
Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 11
179
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee
Proposed Initial
Activity Description Deposit Fee Structure Increase / (Decrease) Note OTHER
8 Extension of Time (per extension, if not separately charged against deposit) $150 Fixed Fee 9 Plan Revision (per revision, if not separately charged against deposit) $75 Fixed Fee 10 Excess Plan Review (per hour, if not separately charged against deposit) $150 Fixed Fee 11 Hourly Rate for Services Not Identified in this Schedule, Other Inspection, Missed/Excess Inspections, Re-inspection Fee

a) In-House Engineering / PW Staff $150 Per Hour
b) Contract Service Support Time & Mat'ls + 15% Fixed Fee c) Attorney / Other Professional Services Time & Mat'ls Fixed Fee 12 Failure to Restore Public Improvements as Required (per day) $150 Per Day 13 Commencing Work Without a Permit or Work Different than Authorized by Permit 2x fees Double fees Initial deposits will be collected and held by the City in a deposit account at the time the application is submitted. Project billing amounts will be drawn from the deposit account. A positive account balance shall be maintained at all times during the review process. No work will be performed on a project with a negative fund balance. If the deposit is reduced to below 20% of the initial deposit amount, the applicant will be notified and required to supplement the deposit account with an additional amount no less than 50% of the original deposit.

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

Note: Deposit amounts listed are typical minimum amounts. The City reserves the right to request a different deposit (lower or higher) based on complexity of project or frequency of inspections needed. [a] For combination driveway, curb, gutter, sidewalk permits to be inspected at same time, only use driveway permit for fee calculation. [b] General encroachment work includes any activity within the public right of way. Fixed fee permit applies to typical utility work with standard WATCH manual traffic control. More complex work requiring additional plan check/traffic control, plan review, testing, and/or inspection, requires a deposit.

DRAFT Appendix C: p. 12
180
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Increase / (Decrease) Note
1 Water - Miscellaneous
a) Meter Testing $75 [a]
b) Cut Lock Fee $75
2 Water Waste Fines
a) Informational Notification No Charge
b) 1st Written Water Waste Notice No Charge
c) 2nd Written Water Waste Notice $25
d) 3rd Written Water Waste Notice $50
e) 4th Written Water Waste Notice $100
f) 5th Written Water Waste Notice $200
g) Subsequent Written Water Waste Notice Disconnection
3 Septic Tank Waste Disposal (cost per gallon)
a) From Septic Tank Waste Within City Limits $0.10
b) From Septic Tank Waste Outside City Limits $0.20
[a] Test amount refundable if meter reading is found to be inaccurate.

Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 13
181
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - CONSTRUCTION WATER METER RENTAL # Activity Description
Current Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee
Current Refundable
Deposit
Proposed Fixed Fee
or Minimum Fee
Proposed Refundable
Deposit Charge Basis Note
1 Construction Water Meter $150; plus the cost of total water usage per month
$1,250 Each [a]
[a] See current utility rates for cost of water.

DRAFT Appendix C: p. 14
182
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Current Fee Proposed Fee Increase / (Decrease) Charge Basis Note 1 Dirt Purchase $40 plus $0.75 per CY $45
plus $1 per CY
per request
2 Debris Clean-Up $98 per hour; 2-hour minimum
3 Grafitti Clean-Up $98 per hour; 2-hour minimum
4 Emergency Residential Tree-Trimming $98 per hour; 2-hour minimum 5 Rates for Services Not Listed Above
a) PW Encroachment Review $150 per hour; 1-hour minimum b) PW Utility Customer Service and City Maintenance
Services
$98 per hour; 1-hour minimum
Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 15
183
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM FEES Current Fee Proposed Fee Increase/(Decrease) Charge Basis Note 1 Youth Performing Arts
a) Per Participant $45 $50 $5
b) Late Fee $5 $6 $1
2 Summer Day Camp $2 $3 $1 per day
3 Youth Sports
a) Per Participant $45 $50 $5
b) Late Fee $5 $6 $1
4 Swim Lessons
a) Group $40 $45 $5
b) Private $65 $75 $10
5 Recreation Swim
a) 17 & Under $1.50 $2.00 $0.50
b) 18 & Older $2.00 $2.50 $0.50
c) Non-swimmer Entrance Fee $1.00 $1.00 $0.00
6 Pool Group Rental Rates
a) 1 to 75 $65 $75 $10 per hour
b) 76-100 $75 $85 $10 per hour
c) 101-125 $85 $95 $10 per hour
Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 16
184
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - PARKS AND FACILITY RENTAL RATES AND CHARGES Current Fee Proposed Fee Increase/(Decrease) Charge Basis Note 1 Senior Center
a) Meeting Rate $35 $40 $5 per hour
b) Banquet Rate $55 $60 $5 per hour
c) Deposit $150 $150 $0 deposit
2 Kerckhoff Park
a) Scout Hut
i) Daily Rate $200 $225 $25 daily rate
ii) Deposit $100 $150 $50 deposit
b) Picnic Shelter $50 $55 $5 daily rate
c) Dance Pavilion $200 $225 $25 daily rate
d) RV / Car Show (Grass Area) $375 $400 $25 daily rate
e) Car Show in conjunction with Event $100 $100 $0 daily rate 3 Lions Park
a) Picnic Pavilion $100 $110 $10 daily rate
b) Athletic Field $75 $85 $10 daily rate
4 Plaza Park
a) Daily Rate ( Non Profit) $35 $40 $5 daily rate
b) Private (Per approval of Director or Designee) $60 $65 $5 daily rate 5 Additional Fees / Permits
a) Alcohol Permit $15 $20 $5
b) Dance Permit $15 $20 $5
c) Bounce House Permit $25 $25 $0
Activity Description
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 17
185
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - KERMAN COMMUNITY CENTER RENTAL RATES AND CHARGES Building Capacity
Room Room Dimensions Square Footage Theater Reception Dance (no seating) Meeting/Classroom Multi-Purpose 60' x 100' 6,000 450 Chairs 400 Guests 475 Attendees 200 Attendees Central 40' x 60' 2,400 180 Chairs 150 Guests 300 Attendees 75 Attendees North / South 30' x 60' 1,800 90 Chairs 80 Guests N/A 40 Attendees User Classifications
Initial Deposit
Activity Description
Current
Resident Rate
Current
Non-Resident Rate
Proposed
Resident Rate
Proposed
Non-Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Non-Resident Rate
Rental Deposit $400 $400 $450 $450 $50 $50
Rental Rates and Charges
Activity Description / Attendance
Current
Resident Rate
Current
Non-Resident Rate
Proposed
Resident Rate
Proposed
Non-Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Non-Resident Rate
1 Banquets / Receptions
a) Private Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $435 $540 $460 $575 $25 $35
ii) 81 - 150 $535 $725 $560 $760 $25 $35
iii) 151 - 220 $610 $750 $635 $785 $25 $35
iv) 221 - 300 $675 $825 $700 $860 $25 $35
v) 301 - 400 $750 $900 $775 $935 $25 $35
vi) Each Additional Hour $100 $125 $110 $135 $10 $10
b) Non-Profit Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $375 $480 $400 $515 $25 $35
ii) 81 - 150 $425 $530 $450 $565 $25 $35
iii) 151 - 220 $475 $580 $500 $615 $25 $35
iv) 221 - 300 $525 $630 $550 $665 $25 $35
v) 301 - 400 $575 $680 $600 $715 $25 $35
vi) Each Additional Hour $100 $125 $110 $135 $10 $10
c) Additional Fees
i) Kitchen Usage $250 $250 $275 $275 $25 $25
ii) Decorating Time (2 hours) $75 $75 $75 $75 $0 $0
iii) Extra Attendant Time (per hour) $35 $35 $40 $40 $5 $5 iv) Alcohol Permit $15 $15 $20 $20 $5 $5
v) Dance Permit $15 $15 $20 $20 $5 $5
Resident - Residing within the 93630 Zip Code
Non-Resident - Residing outside of the 93630 Zip Code
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 18
186
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

BEFORE AND AFTER ILLUSTRATION - KERMAN COMMUNITY CENTER RENTAL RATES AND CHARGES Rental Rates and Charges
Activity Description / Attendance
Current
Resident Rate
Current
Non-Resident Rate
Proposed
Resident Rate
Proposed
Non-Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Non-Resident Rate
2 Theater / Dance / Forum
a) Public Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $285 $360 $310 $395 $25 $35
ii) 81 - 150 $285 $360 $310 $395 $25 $35
iii) 151 - 220 $310 $390 $335 $425 $25 $35
iv) 221 - 300 $335 $420 $360 $455 $25 $35
v) 301 - 400 $360 $450 $385 $485 $25 $35
vi) Each Additional Hour $75 $100 $85 $110 $10 $10
b) Non-Profit Events - (Rates listed below are for the first four hours) i) 1 - 80 $195 $270 $220 $300 $25 $30
ii) 81 - 150 $225 $300 $250 $330 $25 $30
iii) 151 - 220 $255 $300 $280 $330 $25 $30
iv) 221 - 300 $285 $360 $310 $390 $25 $30
v) 301 - 400 $315 $390 $340 $420 $25 $30
vi) Each Additional Hour $75 $100 $85 $110 $10 $10
c) Additional Fees
i) Kitchen Usage $250 $250 $275 $275 $25 $25
ii) Decorating Time (2 hours) $100 $100 $100 $100 $0 $0 iii) Extra Attendant Time (per hour) $40 $40 $40 $40 $0 $0 iv) Alcohol Permit $15 $15 $20 $20 $5 $5
v) Dance Permit $15 $15 $20 $20 $5 $5
Rental Rates and Charges
Activity Description / Attendance
Current
Resident Rate
Current
Non-Resident Rate
Proposed
Resident Rate
Proposed
Non-Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Resident Rate
Increase/(Decrease)
Non-Resident Rate
3 Meetings / Workshops / Conferences
Rates listed below are for a minimum of 2 hours
a) 1 - 49 $60 $60 $65 $65 $5 $5
b) 50 - 100 $70 $70 $75 $75 $5 $5
c) 101 - 200 $80 $80 $85 $85 $5 $5
d) Each Additional Hour Charged at 50%
of 2hr rate
Charged at 50%
of 2hr rate
Charged at 50%
of 2hr rate
Charged at 50%
of 2hr rate
DRAFT Appendix C: p. 19
187
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Schedule of User and Regulatory Fees
DRAFT

ATTACHMENT B
189
Section 7, Item A.

Table of Contents
Note: This Fee Schedule does not include all fees, rates, or charges that may be imposed by the City.

Examples of excluded items include, but are not limited to,development impact fees, utility rates, DRAFT
190
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

DRAFT 1
191
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Description
DRAFT 2
192
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

DRAFT 4
194
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Description
DRAFT 5
195
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Description
DRAFT 6
196
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

DRAFT 7
197
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Description
F. Permit Fee for Stand-Alone or Combination Permits Not Identified Elsewhere in this Schedule DRAFT 10
200
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

G. Building Plan Review Fees
Description
When applicable, plan check fees shall be paid at the time of application for a building permit.

DRAFT 11
201
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

DRAFT 13
203
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

City of Kerman
ENGINEERING - GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES *
Initial Deposit
or Minimum Fee Unit Note

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

DRAFT 15
205
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

DRAFT 16
206
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Note: In addition to amounts shown above, applicant is responsible for any amounts due to outside agencies (e.g., LAFCO, Department of Fish & Wildlife, County).

DRAFT 19
209
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

DRAFT 21
211
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

PUBLIC WORKS FEES
Fee Initial Deposit Fee Structure Note

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PROCESSING
(Fees include plan check, permit issuance, and inspection fees)

City of Kerman

More complex work requiring additional plan check/traffic control, plan review, testing, and/or inspection, requires a deposit.

As may be required for project evaluation or environmental review, all payment for consultant work shall be the responsibility of the applicant.

Initial deposits will be collected and held by the City in a deposit account at the time the application is submitted. Project billing amounts will be drawn from the deposit account.

DRAFT 23
213
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Description
DRAFT 24
214
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

Description
DRAFT 25
215
Section 7, Item A.

City of Kerman

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 9, 2022
PRESENTER: Jesus R. Orozco, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Authority for Deferral of Impact Fees for Commercial Development and Approval of Agreement with Aloo, LLC for Deferral of Development Impact Fees for Site Plan Review 2021-10, Until Certificate of Occupancy (JRO)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt two resolutions: (1) Resolution Authorizing Deferral of Impact Fees for Commercial Development; and (2) Resolution Approving an Agreement for Deferral of Development Impact Fees Between the City of Kerman and Aloo, LLC.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Aloo, LLC (Developer) is currently processing Site Plan Review (SPR) 2021-10 for the development of a Denny’s. Developer has requested the deferral of impact fees until the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. At this time, the City does not have a Development Impact Fee (DIF) Deferment policy or program for commercial development. Resolution 14-25 addresses the collection of fees per Government Code Section 66007. However, that code section only applies to residential subdivisions.

Section 66007 provides in pertinent part that a local agency shall not require the payment of fees on residential development for construction of public improvements or facilities “until the date of the final inspection, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued, whichever occurs first.” Staff has considered this matter and believes that establishment of a deferment policy for commercial development should be considered. As it will take time to do that, at this time staff is requesting (1) the adoption of a basic resolution authorizing deferrals on a case by case basis or pursuant to a policy adopted by the Council and (2) the adoption of an agreement with Developer for the deferral of impact fees until issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

BACKGROUND:

At the onset of supply shortages, the development community has been challenged with beginning and/or completing projects due to the volatile economic market. The City’s Economic Development Strategy Plan identifies “establishing an incentive program” as a key action to promote economic development in the City. While there is no policy or program in place, Staff does recognize the need to assist developers from time to time and will bring forward an Impact Deferral Program for consideration at a later date.
221
Section 7, Item B.
__________________________________________________________________________________ At this time, Developer has entitlement approval of Site Plan Review (SPR) 2021-10 which allows for the development and operation of a Denny’s diner with a drive-through window on a vacant pad west of the Wal-Mart shopping center, at 14235 W. Whitesbridge Road. Currently, the project is pending issuance of a building permit. The current balance due prior to issuance of a building permit is $93,840.03, as shown on Exhibit ‘A’ to the proposed Deferral Agreement.

Building permit fees are determined by either the project’s square footage or acreage, specifically Development Impact Fees (DIF). As part of new development, the developer is responsible for $80,132.97 in DIF of the total $93,840.03 balance. Ms. Sunita Sagar of Aloo LLC., has requested the $80,132.97 due in DIF be deferred to the end of construction, before issuance of a certificate of occupancy (see Attachment ‘B’).

While deferral requests are atypical to commercial development in the City of Kerman, this request is similar to previous deferral agreements that have been granted for residential developments by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no direct fiscal impacts to the City because no portion of fees are being waived or reduced.

The developer will be responsible for remitting DIF at such time the project has been completed.

ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution Deferral Agreement for Commercial Developments B. Resolution Approving Deferral Agreement w/exhibits
222
Section 7, Item B.

Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION 22-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KEMAN AUTHORIZING

THE DEFERRAL OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
WHEREAS, the City of Kerman ( City), pursuant to the laws of the State of California and Kerman Municipal Code section 16.28.200 and Chapter 16.44 has established impact fees for the construction of financing public facilities necessitated by new development projects; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Resolutions 93-21, 94-13, 95-07, 14-24, and 14-25 establishing the purpose and amount of each fee; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 14-25 sets forth the collection of impact fees for residential development; and
WHEREAS, from time to time the City may find it in the public interest to defer impact fees for commercial development; and
WHEREAS, staff is developing a policy for deferral of fees to be presented to Council in the near future.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Kerman resolves as follows:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference.

Section 2. The Council will consider requests for deferral of commercial impact fees on a case by case basis until a formal policy is adopted by Council.

Section 3. Staff is authorized and directed to develop a formal policy with criteria for the deferral of impact and to present to Council for consideration.

Section 4. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

CERTIFICATION ON NEXT PAGE
223
Section 7, Item B.

The foregoing resolution was considered by the City Council to the City of Kerman at a regular meeting of said Council held on November 9, 2022 and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
_____________________
Gary Yep
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
224
Section 7, Item B.

Attachment ‘B’
RESOLUTION NO. 22-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF KERMAN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH ALOO, LLC FOR DEFERRAL OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 2021-10

UNTIL REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a resolution authorizing the consideration of case by case deferral agreements relating to impact fees for commercial development; and WHEREAS, Aloo, LLC., a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter called “Owner” has applied for building permits for Site Plan Review (SPR) 2021-10 hereinafter called the “Project”; and WHEREAS, development of the Project requires that certain permit fees are due and payable at or before the issuance of building permits, more specifically set forth in Exhibit ‘A’ currently estimated at $93,840.03; and
WHEREAS, Owner has requested deferral payment of Development Impact Fees (DIF) totalling $80,132.97 up until request for Certificate of Occupancy; and WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fees Deferral Agreement allows Owner to defer the payment of the Development Impact Fees on the Project until request for a Certificate of Occupancy; and WHEREAS, approval of the proposed agreement is atypical to commercial developments, however, the agreement is consistent with prior agreements for residential developments deferring fees; and WHEREAS, City finds deferral is in the public interest as it promotes economic development in the City of Kerman.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Kerman as follows;

1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated by reference.

2. The Council hereby approves the Development Impact Fees Deferral Agreement with Aloo, LLC, a limited liability company attached as Exhibit ‘A.’

3. This resolution is effective upon adoption.
225
Section 7, Item B.

The foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kerman held on the 9
th day of November, 2022 and passed at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
______________________________
Gary Yep
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
226
Section 7, Item B.

Exhibit ‘A’

AGREEMENT FOR DEFERRAL OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES BETWEEN THE CITY OF KERMAN AND ALOO, LLC. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY This Development Impact Fee Deferral Agreement (“Deferral Agreement") is made by and between the City of Kerman, a municipal corporation, ("City"), and Aloo, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, (“Owner”). The City and Owner may hereinafter be individually referred to as “Party" and collectively as “Parties." The effective date of this Deferral Agreement shall be the last date set forth opposite the signatures of the parties and which is entered at the end of this Deferral Agreement.

RECITALS
A. Aloo, LLC., a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter called “Owner” has applied for building permits for Site Plan Review (SPR) 2021-10 hereinafter called the “Project”.

B. Development of the Project requires that certain permit fees are due and payable at or before the issuance of building permits, more specifically set forth in Exhibit ‘A’ currently estimated at $93,840.03.

C. Owner has requested deferral payment of Development Impact Fees (DIF) totaling $80,132.97 until the request for Certificate of Occupancy.

D. This Deferral Agreement allows Owner to defer the payment of the Development Impact Fees on the Project until request for a Certificate of Occupancy.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by reference, the promises, conditions and covenants set forth in this Deferral Agreement, for the benefit of the health, safety and welfare of the public, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by both Parties, City and the Owner do hereby mutually understand and agree as follows:

Article A. BUILDING PERMITS AND FEE DEFERRAL
Notwithstanding the requirements of building permit that development impact fees are due and payable on or before the issuance of building permits, the Parties agree that such fees shall be paid in accordance with this Deferral Agreement.
227
Section 7, Item B.

1. Building Permits.

1.1 Upon the effective date of this Deferral Agreement, and upon submission of properly completed applications for building permits, payment of the permit fees (excluding the Deferred Fees described below), including, but not limited to normal and usual plan check fees as may be necessary to comply with current Uniform Building Codes, City will authorize the release of building permits to Aloo, LLC such that Owner may develop the Project consistent with Site Plan Review (SPR) 2021-10.

2. Deferral of Fees.

2.1 Impact Fees. The Parties acknowledge and understand that Development Impact Fees, as identified in Exhibit ‘A’, are set at $80,132.97.

2.3 Deferral of Fees. City agrees to defer the collection of the Development Impact Fees in connection with development of the Project until such time as a Certificate of Occupancy is requested (collectively “Deferred Fees”).

3. Conditions Precedent for Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.

3.1 Upon completion of the construction of the Project, including the construction of any improvements legally required for the safe and convenient occupancy of the site, and upon receiving satisfactory final inspections, Owner may apply for a certificate of occupancy. As conditions precedent (collectively “Conditions Precedent”) to City’s obligation to issue a Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, Owner shall provide, to the satisfaction of City the following:
a. Written evidence in a form reasonably acceptable to City that Kerman Unified School District development impact fees have been paid for; and b. Payment of City of Kerman Development Impact Fees specified in Exhibit ‘A’ attached hereto at the rate in effect at the time of payment; and c. Payment of County of Fresno Facilities Impact Fees and the Regional Transportation Mitigation Fees in effect at the time of payment.

Article B. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

1. If either Party is required to commence any proceeding or legal action to enforce or interpret any term, covenant or condition of this Deferral Agreement, the prevailing Party in such proceeding or action shall be entitled to recover from the other Party its reasonable attorneys' fees and legal expenses.
228
Section 7, Item B.

2. The waiver by either Party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Deferral Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Deferral Agreement. No provision or provisions of this Deferral; Agreement may be waived unless in writing and signed by all Parties. Waiver of any one provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision herein.

3. This Deferral Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, excluding, however, any conflict of laws rule which would apply the law of another jurisdiction. Venue for purposes of the filing of any action regarding the enforcement or interpretation of this Improvement Agreement and any rights and duties hereunder shall be Fresno County, California.

4. Each Party acknowledges that it has read and fully understands the contents of this Deferral Agreement. This Deferral Agreement, together with any exhibits and referenced drawings, plans and other documents, represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, whether written or oral. The City and Owner agree that the entirety of this Deferral Agreement shall be interpreted and construed as jointly drafted by their respective legal counsel. This Deferral Agreement may be modified only by written instrument duly authorized and executed by both the City and Owner.

5. Owner hereby warrants that any and all parties having record title interest in the Project which may ripen into a fee have subordinated to this Deferral Agreement and that all such instruments of subordination, if any, are attached hereto and made a part of this Deferral Agreement.

6. Owner shall not assign this Deferral Agreement unless prior written approval has been granted by the City.

7. This Deferral Agreement may be executed in counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. [Signatures Contained on the Following Page]
229
Section 7, Item B.

The Parties have executed this Deferral Agreement on the day or days and year written below.

CITY OWNER
CITY OF KERMAN ALOO, LLC.

A Municipal Corporation A California Limited Liability Company By: _______________________________ By: ____________________________ John Jansons, City Manager Sunita Sagar, Owner/Shareholder Date: __________, 2022 Date: __________, 2022
ATTEST:

Marci Reyes,
City Clerk
By: _______________________________
Date: __________, 2022
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Hilda Cantú Montoy
City Attorney
Date: __________, 2022
230
Section 7, Item B.

Used By Fee Date Fee Code Unit Type Description No of Units Amount Balance Application 4/7/2022 MISPMTPR Miscellaneous Permit Prep Fee 0.00 $24.00 $0.00 Application 4/7/2022 MISPLNCK misblpmt Miscellaneous Plan Check Fee 7,064.00 $4,591.60 $0.00 Permit 4/7/2022 ADAEXTSW ADA Exterior Site Work 0.00 $250.00 $250.00 Permit 4/7/2022 ADAINTRE ADA Interior Tenant Improvements-Restaurant 0.00 $370.00 $370.00 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFADMCO SqFt DIF Administrative Fee Commercial 4,419.00 $441.90 $441.90 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFFIREC SqFt DIF Fire Station & Equipment Commercial 4,419.00 $707.04 $707.04 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFGPUC Acre DIF General Plan Update Commercial 1.31 $483.39 $483.39 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFMJSTC Acre DIF Major Street Commercial 1.31 $5,494.14 $5,494.14 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFOTL DIF Outside Travel Lane 0.00 $310.00 $310.00 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFPBFC Acre DIF Public Building Facilities Commercial 1.31 $2,635.72 $2,635.72 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFRRC Acre DIF Railroad Crossing Commercial 1.31 $1,310.00 $1,310.00 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFSMFC Acre DIF Sewer Major Facilities Commercial 1.31 $3,077.19 $3,077.19 Permit 9/28/2022 DIFSMFC Units DIF Sewer Major Facilities Commercial 16.70 $39,228.30 $39,228.30 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFSWOC Acre DIF Sewer Oversize Commercial 1.31 $1,379.43 $1,379.43 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFSDFC Acre DIF Storm Drain Facilities Commercial 1.31 $8,901.45 $8,901.45 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFSTSGC Acre DIF Street Signal Commercial 1.31 $793.86 $793.86 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFWMFC Acre DIF Water Major Facilities Commercial 1.31 $2,785.06 $2,785.06 Permit 9/28/2022 DIFWMFC Units DIF Water Major Facilities Commercial 5.60 $11,905.60 $11,905.60 Permit 4/7/2022 DIFWOVC Acre DIF Water Oversize Commercial 1.31 $679.89 $679.89 Permit 4/7/2022 ELEFEEC SqFt Electrial Fee Commercial 4,419.00 $309.33 $309.33 Permit 4/7/2022 ELECPMFE Electrical Permit Fee 0.00 $24.00 $24.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MECHFEEC SqFt Mechanical Fee Commercial 4,419.00 $176.76 $176.76 Permit 4/7/2022 MECHOODC Mechanical Hood Commercial 0.00 $40.00 $40.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MECHPMFE Mechanical Permit Fee 0.00 $24.00 $24.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MISARCH2 Each Miscellaneous Archival Fee 8 1/2 x 14 or Larger 48.00 $144.00 $144.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MISARCH1 Each Miscellaneous Archival Fee 8 1/2 x 14 or less 56.00 $42.00 $42.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MISBLPMT Project Cost Miscellaneous Building Permit Fee 1,364,602.00 $7,064.00 $7,064.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MISBLDST Project Cost Miscellaneous Building Standard Fee 1,364,602.00 $55.00 $55.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MISCONSD SqFt Miscellaneous C & D Recycling Deposit 4,419.00 $1,104.75 $1,104.75 Permit 4/7/2022 MISCONSF Miscellaneous C & D Recycling Fee 0.00 $150.00 $150.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MISSTMTC Project Cost Miscellaneous Strong Motion Commercial 1,364,602.00 $382.09 $382.09 Permit 4/7/2022 MISTECH Project Cost Miscellaneous Technology Enhancement Fee 1,364,602.00 $753.50 $753.50 Permit 4/7/2022 MISTIT24 MISBLPMT Miscellaneous Title 24 Electrical Fee 7,064.00 $1,766.00 $1,766.00 Permit 4/7/2022 MISCMETR Miscellaneous Water Meter 0.00 $401.57 $401.57 Permit 9/29/2022 MISCMETR Miscellaneous Water Meter 0.00 $405.11 $405.11 Permit 9/29/2022 PLUPMTFE Plumbing Permit Fee 0.00 $24.00 $24.00 Permit 10/3/2022 PLUFEEC SqFt Pluming Fee Commercial 4,419.00 $220.95 $220.95 $4,615.60
$13,707.06
$80,132.97
$93,840.03
$98,455.63
Payments
Permit Fees
DIF
Balance
Total Fees
Exhibit 'A'
231
Section 7, Item B.

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 9, 2022
PRESENTER: Jesus R. Orozco, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Pre-Approved Accessory Dwelling Unit Standard Plans Program and Homeowner’s Guide (JRO)
RECOMMENDATION: Council Approve a Resolution Adopting Pre-Approved Accessory Dwelling Unit Standard Plans Program and Homeowner’s Guide and Directing Staff to Initiate the Program Upon Date of Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Kerman was awarded Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant funding from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to help address housing needs and streamline housing production throughout California. A share of the City’s awarded LEAP grant has been allocated towards the design and adoption of pre-approved accessory dwelling unit (ADU) standard plans alongside a Homeowner’s Guide. The pre-approved ADU standard plans program consists of (3) different floor plans available to City of Kerman residents.

DISCUSSION:

Staff has been working with Precision Civil Engineering, consulting City Planner, to develop codecompliant pre-approved ADU standard plans in key size thresholds for use by residents/property owners for permitting and construction. The floor plans selected are all single-story available in three (3) varying architectural styles, including the following unit types and sizes:
 Studio (1ba) 386 sq. ft.
 One-bedroom (1ba) 498 sq. ft.
 One-bedroom + flex (1ba) 748 sq. ft.

The selected floor plans were given consideration due to buildable area averages of underutilized residential zoned parcels. Additionally, the 386 sq. ft. and 498 sq. ft. ADU’s are not subject to schools fees and the 748 sq. ft. floor plan is not subject to development impact fees resulting in additional savings.

It should be noted several site specific code-based requirements are not includes part of the preapproved ADU standard plans. For example; Photovoltaic System (solar), Automatic Residential Fire Sprinkler System, Title 24 Calculation and Compliance Report, and Roof Truss Calculations are site specific requirements that must be reviewed on a lot-by-lot basis. As such, the ADU standard plans defer the listed requirements to the resident/property owner because it is difficult to account for every possible scenario.
232
Section 7, Item C.

Over all, adoption of the ADU pre-approved standard plans will streamline the permitting process and save Kerman residents design costs while meeting the goals and objectives as set forth by LEAP guidelines and HCD.

Program Expiration
The pre-approved ADU standard plans have been reviewed under the 2019, Title 24 California Building Standards Code. Once adopted, the standard plans will be once again reviewed for compliance with the 2022, Title 24 California Building Standards Code sometime in January of 2023.

Tentatively, there is limited funding to cover revisions and plan review cost of the pre-approved ADU standard plans under the 2022 code update. Due to the uncertainty of future funding, Staff reccomends that the pre-approved ADU standard plans program sunset on December 31, 2025. If State funding is not available, Council may allocate General Fund monies to cover future ADU standard plan revisions and plan review cost.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Design and adoption of the pre-approved ADU standard plans have been funded by Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant funding from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). No General Fund monies have been used on the design of the ADU program thus far.

ATTACHMENTS:

A. Resolution w/Exhibits
233
Section 7, Item C.

Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO. 22-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN ADOPTING PRE-APPROVED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT STANDARD PLANS PROGRAM AND HOMEOWNER’S GUIDE AND

DIRECTING STAFF TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM UPON DATE OF APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City of Kerman was awarded Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant funding from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to help address housing needs and streamline housing production; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kerman allocated a share of the City’s awarded LEAP grant funding towards the design and adoption of pre-approved Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) standard plans and Homeowner’s Guide; and
WHEREAS, City Staff has been working alongside Precision Civil Engineering, consulting City Planner, to develop code-compliant pre-approved ADU standard plans for permitting and construction and the Homeowner’s Guide; and
WHEREAS, three pre-approved ADU standard plans in three varying architectural styles, unit types and sizes have been prepared for City residents to utilize subject to compliance with all California Building Standards Codes and applicable supplemental documentation, including deferred items not included as part of the pre-approved ADU standard plans; and
WHEREAS, adoption of the pre-approved ADU standard plans program and the Homeowner’s Guide meets the goals and objectives as set forth by LEAP guidelines and the HCD; and WHEREAS, due to the uncertainty of future funding, the pre-approved ADU standard plans program shall expire on December 31, 2025 unless extended by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Kerman resolves as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council adopts the pre-approved ADU Standard Plans and Homeowner’s Guide for permitting and construction as set forth in Exhibits A and B respectively which are attached and incorporated by reference.

Section 3. The City Council authorizes City Staff to implement the ADU Standard Plans and Homeowner’s Guide Program and to make minor modifications thereon in order to ensure compliance with any local and/or State requirements throughout the program’s term.

Section 4. The City Council acknowledges future funding for the pre-approved ADU standard plans program is uncertain and therefore must limit the program to expire on December 31, 2025, unless extended by the City Council.

Section 5. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption. 234
Section 7, Item C.

The foregoing resolution was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Kerman at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of November 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

The foregoing resolution is hereby approved.
_____________________________
Gary Yep
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Marci Reyes
City Clerk
235
Section 7, Item C.
236
Section 7, Item C.
237
Section 7, Item C.
238
Section 7, Item C.
239
Section 7, Item C.
240
Section 7, Item C.
241
Section 7, Item C.
242
Section 7, Item C.
243
Section 7, Item C.
244
Section 7, Item C.
245
Section 7, Item C.
246
Section 7, Item C.
247
Section 7, Item C.
248
Section 7, Item C.
249
Section 7, Item C.
250
Section 7, Item C.
251
Section 7, Item C.
252
Section 7, Item C.
253
Section 7, Item C.
254
Section 7, Item C.
255
Section 7, Item C.
256
Section 7, Item C.
257
Section 7, Item C.
258
Section 7, Item C.
259
Section 7, Item C.
260
Section 7, Item C.
261
Section 7, Item C.
262
Section 7, Item C.
263
Section 7, Item C.
264
Section 7, Item C.
265
Section 7, Item C.
266
Section 7, Item C.
267
Section 7, Item C.
268
Section 7, Item C.
269
Section 7, Item C.
270
Section 7, Item C.
271
Section 7, Item C.
272
Section 7, Item C.
273
Section 7, Item C.
274
Section 7, Item C.
275
Section 7, Item C.
276
Section 7, Item C.
277
Section 7, Item C.
278
Section 7, Item C.
279
Section 7, Item C.
280
Section 7, Item C.
281
Section 7, Item C.
282
Section 7, Item C.
283
Section 7, Item C.
284
Section 7, Item C.
285
Section 7, Item C.
286
Section 7, Item C.
287
Section 7, Item C.
288
Section 7, Item C.
289
Section 7, Item C.
290
Section 7, Item C.
291
Section 7, Item C.
292
Section 7, Item C.
293
Section 7, Item C.
294
Section 7, Item C.
295
Section 7, Item C.
296
Section 7, Item C.
297
Section 7, Item C.
298
Section 7, Item C.
299
Section 7, Item C.
300
Section 7, Item C.
301
Section 7, Item C.
302
Section 7, Item C.
303
Section 7, Item C.
304
Section 7, Item C.
305
Section 7, Item C.
306
Section 7, Item C.
307
Section 7, Item C.
308
Section 7, Item C.
309
Section 7, Item C.
310
Section 7, Item C.
311
Section 7, Item C.
312
Section 7, Item C.
313
Section 7, Item C.
314
Section 7, Item C.
315
Section 7, Item C.
316
Section 7, Item C.

ADU
A Homeowner’s Guide to
Accessory Dwelling Units

CITY OF KERMAN
850 S. MADERA AVENUE
KERMAN, CA 93630
(559) 846-6121
MAY 2022

CITY OF KERMAN
NOVEMBER 2022

EXHIBIT 'B'
317
Section 7, Item C.

CITY OF KERMAN ADU GUIDE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

ADU BASICS

OVERVIEW OF BUILDING AN ADU

BUILDING AN ADU IN THE CITY OF KERMAN
STEP 1. REVIEW BASIC ADU REQUIREMENTS
STEP 2. DESIGN YOUR ADU
STEP 3. PREPARE AND SUBMIT YOUR APPLICATION

CITY OF KERMAN ADU PRE-APPROVED PROGRAM

INTRODUCTION

FINDING YOUR ADU FIT

FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

REFERENCES

CREDITS
1 2
3 4
5 8
9 10
10 11
12 18
19 19
Table of Contents October 2022
318
Section 7, Item C.

Sometimes called "in-law units," "secondary dwelling units," or "backyard cottages," an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is a complete, independent living facility for one or more persons. These structures can be detached from or attached to a primary residence, converted from existing square footage of a primary residence, or converted from an existing accessory structure such as a garage or workshop.

To provide additional housing opportunities in the Kerman in response to housing supply shortages and lack of affordable options, the City of Kerman is working on adopting an ADU Ordinance and established a Pre-Approved ADU Program. The purpose of the Program is to reduce or eliminate obstacles for Kerman residents to construct an ADU in their backyard by offering pre-approved construction plans including floor plans and elevations. The preapproved plans will help reduce costs and timeframes for design, permitting, and approval of ADUs.

This How-to-Guide outlines step-by-step instructions for building an ADU on your property, providing considerations from regulations and processing timelines to design and costs. This Guide answers the following questions:
• Can I build an ADU on my property?
• What are the restrictions of designing my ADU?
• What are the necessary steps to building my ADU?
ADU = ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT

INTRODUCTION

Page 1 ends

Kerman City CouncilNovember 9, 2022

Kerman City Council
November 9, 2022