La Mesa City Council
May 13, 2025

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411

3. Pedestrian Volume (20 points)
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major street during the busiest hour of an average day.

Pedestrian counts were conducted by National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) on Tuesday, April 16, 2024, between 12:00 am and 11:59 pm. The peak pedestrian hour took place between 2:00-3:00 pm, when 155 pedestrians crossed El Paso Street near the subject intersection.

POINTS: 20

4. Traffic Volume (24 points)
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the intersection during the eight busiest hours of an average day.

Hour
Ending
At: 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

NB - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SB 7 14 9 9 8 1 9 4 23 6 6 8 5 6 2
Subtotal 7 14 9 9 8 1 9 4 23 6 6 8 5 6 2
EB 30 83 86 74 83 88 113 124 122 119 153 119 96 63 40
WB 33 204 116 79 98 83 120 120 170 155 149 140 88 82 48 Subtotal 63 287 202 153 181 171 233 244 292 274 302 259 184 145 88 TOTAL 70 301 211 162 189 172 242 248 315 280 308 267 189 151 90 POINTS
In residence districts, if the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street exceeds 35 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants 70% of the above requirements. The 85th percentile approach speed at the intersection of El Paso Street at Dalhart Avenue is 30 mph.

POINTS: 0

5. Traffic Volume Difference (10 points)
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach traffic volumes are nearly equal.

Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following table 128 (24-Hour Minor St Approach Volume) = 3.98%
1,751+1,459 (24-Hour Major St Approach Volume)
POINTS: 0

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411

6. Caltrans Criteria (Chapter 4 Caltrans Traffic Manual) Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation regardless of the point system:

1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation
The intersection of El Paso Street at Dalhart Avenue would not warrant the installation of a traffic signal.

2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12-month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include rightand left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.

According to SWITRS collision data, one crash was reported at the intersection between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2023, however the crash involved a motor vehicle and fixed object and would not be correctable by all-way stop installation.

3. Minimum traffic volumes – the total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and the combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but when the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements According to counts conducted, the average total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is 272 vehicles for any 8 hours of an average day and major street traffic is below 35 mph. The vehicular volumes are not met for the major street, and the vehicle and pedestrian volumes for the minor street do not meet the required volumes to satisfy this criterion.

Based on Caltrans criteria only, the intersection of El Paso Street at Dalhart Avenue would not warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation.

TOTAL POINTS: 41

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Final Recommendation
The all-way stop analysis above resulted in a total score of 41 points, which does not meet the minimum required 45 points to justify an all-way stop based on the City of La Mesa’s requirements. However, the City’s guidelines allow the 45-point minimum requirement to be waived if the City Engineer or designee applies traffic engineering judgement and determines that an all-way stop control is appropriate. The intersection is adjacent to Murray Manor Elementary School and includes a marked school crosswalk with a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon on the west leg. There is a very high number of pedestrians crossing El Paso Street near the intersection, primarily elementary school-aged children and parents during drop-off and pick-up operations. The winding horizontal curves and rolling vertical grades along El Paso Street approaching the intersection results in limited visibility of the intersection and falls short of meeting minimum stopping sight distance requirements. Because of these roadway characteristics and the potential conflict of pedestrians, who are the most vulnerable users, it is recommended that the point requirement be waved and that an all-way stop control be installed at the intersection of El Paso Street at Dalhart Avenue.

Please call me if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Joe Shultz, P.E.

RCE P.E. No. 84152
Attachments:
 Attachment A – CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop Applications
 Attachment B – Existing Traffic Count Data Sheets
 Attachment C – Speed Survey Data Sheets
 Attachment D – SWITRS Collision Report
 Attachment E – Intersection Sight Distance Graphic
 Attachment F – CA-MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets  Attachment G – Murray Manor Elementary School Suggested Routes to School Map

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment A – CA-MUTCD Multi-Way Stop Applications

Section 2B.07 of the CA-MUTCD, Multi-Way Stop Applications, lists four criteria that should be considered within an engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation.

Criteria A states that where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.

The intersection of El Paso Street at Dalhart Avenue does not warrant the installation of a traffic control signal. This criteria is not met.

Criteria B analyses the crash history at the intersection. For this criteria, five or more reported crashes must be reported within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop. Crashes susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop include right- and left-turn collisions and right-angle collisions.

Per SWITRS collision data, the 5-year data was taken between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2023. According to SWITRS collision data, one crash was reported during the 5-year study period. This criteria is not met.

Criteria C analyses the minimum volumes at the intersection approaches. This criteria has three parts.

1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day.

According to counts conducted, the average vehicular volume entering the intersection from both approaches of the major street is 262 vehicles for 8 hours of an average day. This criteria is not met.

2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor–street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour.

Crossing pedestrian counts were conducted and showed that a maximum of 197 vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entered the intersection from the minor street at 2:00 pm. This criteria is not met.

3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. 24-hour speed data was collected along El Paso Street, west of Dalhart Avenue, on Tuesday, April 16, 2024. Based on the speed data, the 85th percentile approach speed of El Paso Street is 30 mph. This criteria is not met.

Criteria D states that where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 can be satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. This criteria is not met.

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment B – Existing Traffic Count Data Sheets

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Dalhart Ave & El Paso St
City: La Mesa Project ID:

Control: 1-Way Stop(SB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0000010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
12:00 AM 0000100001000100 3
12:15 AM 0000000000000200 2
12:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
12:45 AM 0000000001000400 5
1:00 AM 0000000001000010 2
1:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
1:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
1:45 AM 0000001000000100 2
2:00 AM 0000100002000000 3
2:15 AM 0000000000010300 4
2:30 AM 0000000001000100 2
2:45 AM 0000000002000100 3
3:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
3:15 AM 0000000002000100 3
3:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
3:45 AM 0000000000000200 2
4:00 AM 0000000002000200 4
4:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
4:30 AM 0000000001000100 2
4:45 AM 0000102001000100 5
5:00 AM 0000100001000300 5
5:15 AM 0000000000000200 2
5:30 AM 0000000000000300 3
5:45 AM 0000100003000500 9
6:00 AM 0000002036000310 15
6:15 AM 0000001005000600 12
6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 13 0 0 20
6:45 AM 0000103009000901 23
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 14 1 0 23
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 43 1 0 58
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 58 0 1 80
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 7 0 3 1 1 42 0 0 0 69 13 4 140
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 1 21 0 1 0 39 1 1 71
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 0 1 0 30 2 0 52
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 22 0 0 0 21 3 2 51
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 0 15 2 0 37
9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 20 0 0 0 17 1 0 41
9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 17 0 0 0 19 0 0 39
9:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 15 0 1 0 18 0 0 37
9:45 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 0 21 3 0 45

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 23 0 23 1 15 273 0 4 0 428 29 9 805 APPROACH %'s : 48.94% 0.00% 48.94% 2.13% 5.14% 93.49% 0.00% 1.37% 0.00% 91.85% 6.22% 1.93% PEAK HR : 7:15 AM 38 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 12 0 7 1 2 96 0 1 0 209 15 6 349
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.429 0.000 0.438 0.250 0.500 0.571 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.757 0.288 0.375 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 31 2 0 52
10:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 16 0 0 0 21 0 0 39
10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 19 2 0 47
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 22 1 0 51
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 19 0 0 37
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 19 0 0 40
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 22 0 0 0 20 1 0 45
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 23 1 0 50
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 29 0 0 0 27 0 0 62
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 21 0 1 0 26 1 1 53
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 25 0 0 0 36 1 0 63
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 33 0 1 0 26 1 1 64
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 30 0 1 0 28 0 1 63
1:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 29 0 0 0 25 1 0 56
1:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 28 0 0 0 27 2 0 59
1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 31 0 0 0 33 2 1 70

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 11 0 10 1 13 392 0 3 0 402 15 4 851 APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 0.00% 45.45% 4.55% 3.19% 96.08% 0.00% 0.74% 0.00% 95.49% 3.56% 0.95% PEAK HR : 1:00 PM 169 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 5 118 0 1 0 113 5 2 248
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.417 0.952 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.856 0.625 0.500 0000010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 32 0 0 0 39 3 0 77
2:15 PM 0 0 0 0 9 0 5 0 2 26 0 0 0 61 8 0 111
2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 34 0 0 0 33 1 1 74
2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 24 0 0 0 23 1 0 53
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 32 0 0 0 37 2 0 73
3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 37 0 0 0 42 1 0 81
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 22 0 0 0 34 3 1 66
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 33 2 0 60
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 41 0 0 0 38 3 0 84
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 26 0 0 0 34 0 0 62
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 45 0 2 0 41 3 0 93
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 36 0 0 0 29 1 0 69
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 31 0 0 0 38 1 0 76
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 22 0 0 0 40 0 0 69
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 25 0 0 0 27 0 0 54
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32 0 0 0 32 2 0 68
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 30 0 0 0 21 1 0 57
6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 28 0 0 0 22 1 1 54
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 22 0 0 38
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 0 20 0 0 40
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 16 0 0 0 19 1 0 40
7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 25 0 0 41
7:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 17 0 0 36
7:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 12 0 0 0 19 1 0 34
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 15 0 0 0 14 0 0 30
8:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 12 0 0 22
8:30 PM 0000100006000810 16
8:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 13 0 0 22
9:00 PM 0000000007000510 13
9:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 1 0 5 0 0 19
9:30 PM 0000000015000300 9
9:45 PM 0000100014000200 8
10:00 PM 0000000002000300 5
10:15 PM 0000001003000200 6
10:30 PM 0000000001000100 2
10:45 PM 0000000013000310 8
11:00 PM 0000000003000000 3
11:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
11:30 PM 0000000000000300 3
11:45 PM 0000000002010300 6

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 25 0 34 0 33 722 0 4 0 823 38 3 1682 APPROACH %'s : 42.37% 0.00% 57.63% 0.00% 4.35% 95.13% 0.00% 0.53% 0.00% 95.25% 4.40% 0.35% PEAK HR : 2:00 PM 281 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 0 13 0 10 0 6 116 0 0 0 156 13 1 315 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.361 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.750 0.853 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.639 0.406 0.250 Data - Totals
Dalhart Ave Dalhart Ave El Paso St El Paso St

0.455 0.576 0.669

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NOON NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
24-040061-001
4/11/2024
02:00 PM - 03:00 PM

0.709 0.411 0.871 0.616
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM

0.886 0.500 0.912 0.833
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM

0.623

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Dalhart Ave & El Paso St
City: La Mesa Project ID:

Control: 1-Way Stop(SB) Date:

NS/EW Streets:
0000010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
12:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
12:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
12:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
12:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
1:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
1:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
1:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
1:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
2:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
2:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
2:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
2:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
3:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
3:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
3:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
3:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
4:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
4:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
4:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
4:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
5:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
5:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
5:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
6:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
6:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
6:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
6:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
7:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:00 AM 0000000000000100 1
8:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
9:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
9:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
9:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
9:45 AM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000000001001
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
PEAK HR : 7:15 AM 38 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000001001
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 0000010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
10:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
10:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
10:30 AM 0000000000000100 1
10:45 AM 0000000000000000 0
11:00 AM 0000000000000000 0
11:15 AM 0000000000000000 0
11:30 AM 0000000000000000 0
11:45 AM 0000000001000000 1
12:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
12:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
12:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
12:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
1:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
1:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
1:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
1:45 PM 0000000000000100 1

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 00000000010002003
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 1:00 PM 169 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000000001001
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0000010001000100

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
2:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
2:15 PM 0000000001000000 1
2:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
2:45 PM 0000000000000100 1
3:00 PM 0000000002000000 2
3:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
3:30 PM 0000001000000010 2
3:45 PM 0000000001000100 2
4:00 PM 0000000000000100 1
4:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
4:30 PM 0000000000000100 1
4:45 PM 0000000001000000 1
5:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
5:30 PM 0000000001000100 2
5:45 PM 0000000001000000 1
6:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
6:15 PM 0000000000000100 1
6:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
6:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
7:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
7:15 PM 0000000001000000 1
7:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
7:45 PM 0000000001000000 1
8:00 PM 0000000000000100 1
8:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
8:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
8:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
9:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
9:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
9:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
9:45 PM 0000000001000000 1
10:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
10:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
10:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
10:45 PM 0000000000000000 0
11:00 PM 0000000000000000 0
11:15 PM 0000000000000000 0
11:30 PM 0000000000000000 0
11:45 PM 0000000000000000 0

NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 7 1 0 19
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 87.50% 12.50% 0.00% PEAK HR : 2:00 PM 281 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 00000000010001002
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 Data - Bikes
Dalhart Ave Dalhart Ave El Paso St El Paso St

0.250

AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NOON NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
24-040061-001
4/11/2024
02:00 PM - 03:00 PM

0.500 0.250 0.250
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM

0.250 0.250
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM

0.250

National Data & Surveying Services
Intersection Turning Movement Count
Location: Dalhart Ave & El Paso St Project ID:

City: La Mesa Date:

NS/EW Streets:

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
12:00 AM 00000000 0
12:15 AM 00000000 0
12:30 AM 00000000 0
12:45 AM 00000000 0
1:00 AM 00000000 0
1:15 AM 00000000 0
1:30 AM 00000000 0
1:45 AM 00000000 0
2:00 AM 00000000 0
2:15 AM 00000000 0
2:30 AM 00000000 0
2:45 AM 00000000 0
3:00 AM 00000000 0
3:15 AM 00000000 0
3:30 AM 00000000 0
3:45 AM 00000000 0
4:00 AM 00000000 0
4:15 AM 00000000 0
4:30 AM 01000000 1
4:45 AM 00000000 0
5:00 AM 00000000 0
5:15 AM 00000000 0
5:30 AM 00000000 0
5:45 AM 01001000 2
6:00 AM 01000000 1
6:15 AM 00000000 0
6:30 AM 00000000 0
6:45 AM 00000000 0
7:00 AM 00000000 0
7:15 AM 00000000 0
7:30 AM 15000059 20
7:45 AM 8 24 0 0 0 0 23 82 137
8:00 AM 31001043 12
8:15 AM 11000001 3
8:30 AM 00000010 1
8:45 AM 00000012 3
9:00 AM 00000001 1
9:15 AM 00001000 1
9:30 AM 00000010 1
9:45 AM 11000011 4

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 14 35 0 0 3 0 36 99 187
APPROACH %'s : 28.57% 71.43% 100.00% 0.00% 26.67% 73.33% PEAK HR : 7:15 AM 37 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 12 30 0 0 1 0 32 94 169
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.375 0.313 0.250 0.348 0.287
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
10:00 AM 01000003 4
10:15 AM 01000001 2
10:30 AM 00000021 3
10:45 AM 01000000 1
11:00 AM 01000012 4
11:15 AM 00000000 0
11:30 AM 00000000 0
11:45 AM 11000000 2
12:00 PM 20000020 4
12:15 PM 00000000 0
12:30 PM 00000000 0
12:45 PM 00000000 0
1:00 PM 00000000 0
1:15 PM 01000000 1
1:30 PM 01000011 3
1:45 PM 00000103 4

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 3 7 0 0 0 1 6 11 28
APPROACH %'s : 30.00% 70.00% 0.00% 100.00% 35.29% 64.71% PEAK HR : 1:00 PM 167 -2 -2 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 48
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.333

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
2:00 PM 00000007 7
2:15 PM 12 4 0 0 0 1 96 33 146
2:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 18
2:45 PM 00000010 1
3:00 PM 00000000 0
3:15 PM 00000000 0
3:30 PM 00000000 0
3:45 PM 00000000 0
4:00 PM 11000001 3
4:15 PM 00000000 0
4:30 PM 00000000 0
4:45 PM 00000000 0
5:00 PM 00000000 0
5:15 PM 02000010 3
5:30 PM 00000000 0
5:45 PM 00000000 0
6:00 PM 01000000 1
6:15 PM 01000000 1
6:30 PM 00000000 0
6:45 PM 11000001 3
7:00 PM 00000010 1
7:15 PM 00000000 0
7:30 PM 00000002 2
7:45 PM 01000000 1
8:00 PM 00000000 0
8:15 PM 00000000 0
8:30 PM 00000000 0
8:45 PM 00000000 0
9:00 PM 00000000 0
9:15 PM 00000000 0
9:30 PM 00000000 0
9:45 PM 00000000 0
10:00 PM 00000000 0
10:15 PM 00000000 0
10:30 PM 00000000 0
10:45 PM 01000000 1
11:00 PM 00000000 0
11:15 PM 00000000 0
11:30 PM 00000000 0
11:45 PM 00000000 0

EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 15 12 0 0 0 1 115 45 188
APPROACH %'s : 55.56% 44.44% 0.00% 100.00% 71.88% 28.13% PEAK HR : 2:00 PM 278 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 13 4 0 0 0 1 113 41 172
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.271 0.250 0.250 0.294 0.311
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Dalhart Ave Dalhart Ave El Paso St El Paso St

0.250 0.300
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM

AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

NOON NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG

PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
24-040061-001
4/11/2024

0.295 0.266 0.250 0.298
02:00 PM - 03:00 PM
01:00 PM - 02:00 PM

0.500 0.500 0.250 0.417

0.308 0.328

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment C – Speed Survey Data Sheets

Day: Tuesday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_004
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 0:00 0022000000000 4 0021000000000 3 0043000000000 7
1:00 0012000000000 3 0121000000000 4 0133000000000 7
2:00 1011000000000 3 1010010000000 3 2021010000000 6
3:00 0010000000000 1 0101100000000 3 0111100000000 4
4:00 1112300000000 8 1114200000000 9 2226500000000 17
5:00 0125100000000 9 0015210000000 9 0 1 3 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 6:00 0 0 8 13 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 1 2 4 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 2 12 27 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 587:00 17 19 21 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 13 13 31 26 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 30 32 52 42 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1708:00 0 10 28 39 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 6 11 30 34 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 6 21 58 73 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1749:00 0 6 26 31 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 11 5 15 23 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 11 11 41 54 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 10:00 1 8 30 43 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 19 5 25 21 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 20 13 55 64 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17011:00 0 6 33 53 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 15 10 27 35 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 15 16 60 88 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 199 12:00 0 5 30 40 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 16 9 34 29 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 16 14 64 69 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 187 13:00 2 9 40 45 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 6 13 38 32 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 8 22 78 77 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 215 14:00 7 29 48 26 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 32 28 36 38 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 39 57 84 64 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 267 15:00 2 7 50 46 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 9 5 43 42 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 11 12 93 88 32 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 237 16:00 0 9 45 74 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 15 12 40 56 18 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 15 21 85 130 36 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 293 17:00 2 2 39 57 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 5 9 27 45 25 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 7 11 66 102 48 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 238 18:00 0 2 16 61 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 4 11 21 29 22 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 4 13 37 90 44 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 19:00 0 0 20 33 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 1 7 10 32 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 1 7 30 65 22 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13020:00 0 6 13 14 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 5 10 25 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 11 23 39 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 21:00 0 1 8 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 0 5 13 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 1 13 29 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 22:00 0016500000000 12 3133100000000 11 3149600000000 23 23:00 0027200000000 11 1014610000000 13 1 0 3 11 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Totals 33 121 466 632 180 11 0000000 1,443 160 149 407 513 223 31 6000000 1,489 193 270 873 1,145 403 42 6000000 2,932 % of Totals 2% 8% 32% 44% 12% 1% 100% 11% 10% 27% 34% 15% 2% 0% 100% 7% 9% 30% 39% 14% 1% 0% 100% 00:00 ‐ 12:00 20 51 154 207 47 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 482 67 49 139 165 65 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 493 87 100 293 372 112 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 975 % 1% 4% 11% 14% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 5% 3% 10% 11% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 34% 6% 7% 20% 26% 8% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 68% Peak Hour 7:00 7:15 10:30 10:45 9:00 6:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 10:30 10:00 7:45 7:45 11:15 9:30 8:30 7:15 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 7:15 7:15 7:45 11:15 9:30 6:00 7:15 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 7:45 Peak Volume 17 26 44 56 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 19 22 47 41 19 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 33 44 76 91 31 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 12:00 ‐ 24:00 13 70 312 425 133 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 961 93 100 268 348 158 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 996 106 170 580 773 291 32 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1957 % 1% 5% 22% 29% 9% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 67% 6% 7% 19% 24% 11% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 69% 7% 12% 40% 54% 20% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 136% Peak Hour 14:00 13:45 14:45 16:00 17:30 12:45 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 16:00 14:00 14:00 15:15 15:45 16:15 18:00 16:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:45 14:00 13:45 15:15 16:00 17:30 18:00 16:15 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:45 Peak Volume 7 32 56 74 26 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 32 28 52 58 26 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 39 57 103 130 49 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 294 07:00 ‐ 09:00 17 29 49 55 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 19 24 61 60 19 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 185 36 53 110 115 27 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 % 1% 2% 3% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 1% 2% 4% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 2% 4% 8% 8% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 24% Peak Hour 7:00 7:15 7:30 8:00 7:00 7:30 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:30 7:30 7:45 7:45 7:45 7:00 7:45 7:15 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 7:15 7:15 7:45 8:00 7:00 7:45 7:15 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:45 Peak Volume 17 26 31 39 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 17 22 47 36 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 33 44 76 73 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 16:00 ‐ 18:00 2 11 84 131 41 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 271 20 21 67 101 43 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 22 32 151 232 84 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 531 % 0% 1% 6% 9% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19% 1% 1% 5% 7% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 18% 2% 2% 10% 16% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 37% Peak Hour 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Peak Volume 2 9 45 74 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 15 12 40 56 26 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 15 21 85 130 48 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 293 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
El Paso St W/O Dalhart Ave
4/16/2024
Time

EASTBOUND
Total

WESTBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total

HOURLY BREAKDOWN STATISTICS
Direction Percentiles 15th 50th Average 85th 95th ADT
1489
TOTALS 20 26 25 30 34 2932
WESTBOUND 17 25 24 31 34
EASTBOUND 21 26 25 30 33 1443

Day: Tuesday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_004
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
El Paso St W/O Dalhart Ave
4/16/2024
Time

EASTBOUND
Total

WESTBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total
0:00 0010000000000 1 0001000000000 1 0011000000000 2
0:15 0001000000000 1 0010000000000 1 0011000000000 2
0:30 0001000000000 1 0010000000000 1 0011000000000 2
0:45 0010000000000 1 0000000000000 0 0010000000000 1
1:00 0011000000000 2 0001000000000 1 0012000000000 3
1:15 0001000000000 1 0000000000000 0 0001000000000 1
1:30 0000000000000 0 0010000000000 1 0010000000000 1
1:45 0000000000000 0 0110000000000 2 0110000000000 2
2:00 0011000000000 2 0000000000000 0 0011000000000 2
2:15 0000000000000 0 1010000000000 2 1010000000000 2
2:30 1000000000000 1 0000010000000 1 1000010000000 2
2:45 0000000000000 0 0000000000000 0 0000000000000 0
3:00 0000000000000 0 0001000000000 1 0001000000000 1
3:15 0000000000000 0 0000100000000 1 0000100000000 1
3:30 0010000000000 1 0000000000000 0 0010000000000 1
3:45 0000000000000 0 0100000000000 1 0100000000000 1
4:00 1000000000000 1 0010000000000 1 1010000000000 2
4:15 0001100000000 2 1001000000000 2 1002100000000 4
4:30 0110200000000 4 0001000000000 1 0111200000000 5
4:45 0001000000000 1 0102200000000 5 0103200000000 6
5:00 0000100000000 1 0010100000000 2 0010200000000 3
5:15 0010000000000 1 0003000000000 3 0013000000000 4
5:30 0011000000000 2 0001010000000 2 0012010000000 4
5:45 0104000000000 5 0001100000000 2 0105100000000 7
6:00 0022200000000 6 1012000000000 4 1034200000000 10
6:15 0046200000000 12 0200000000000 2 0246200000000 146:30 0012110000000 5 0026200000000 10 0038310000000 15 6:45 0013410000000 9 0016300000000 10 0029710000000 19
7:00 0037100000000 11 2002200000000 6 2039300000000 17
7:15 1166100000000 15 0158500000000 19 1 2 11 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 347:30 5573200000000 22 0147300000000 15 5 6 11 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 377:45 11 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 11 11 22 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 22 24 27 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 8:00 0795100000000 22 5 5 15 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 5 12 24 13 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 578:15 0 0 10 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1137300000000 15 1 1 13 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 358:30 0 2 5 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 5 7 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 7 12 22 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 438:45 0 1 4 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0057500000000 17 0 1 9 23 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399:00 0065200000000 13 3247100000000 17 3 2 10 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 309:15 0 2 8 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1226210000000 14 1 4 10 18 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399:30 0269400000000 21 4166400000000 21 4 3 12 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 429:45 0265400000000 17 3034700000000 17 3 2 9 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 10:00 1429100000000 17 8225310000000 21 9 6 4 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3810:15 0226300000000 13 1178510000000 23 1 3 9 14 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3610:30 0 1 14 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 3 0 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 3 1 24 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4510:45 0 1 12 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 7267000000000 22 7 3 18 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 11:00 0 1 12 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 2196300000000 21 2 2 21 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 11:15 0 0 6 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 6669400000000 31 6 6 12 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5311:30 0 3 10 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 4 2 6 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 4 5 16 26 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5811:45 0 2 5 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 3169200000000 21 3 3 11 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 15‐MINUTE BREAKDOWN

Day: Tuesday City: La Mesa
Date: Project #: CA24_040060_004
5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 99 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
El Paso St W/O Dalhart Ave
4/16/2024
Time

EASTBOUND
Total

WESTBOUND
Total
TOTALS
Total
12:00 0147300000000 15 2 2 6 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 2 3 10 19 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4112:15 0 1 6 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 5354700000000 24 5 4 11 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4312:30 0 1 13 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 5 1 10 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 5 2 23 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5212:45 0 2 7 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 4 3 13 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 4 5 20 17 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5113:00 0 2 10 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 1 3 11 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 5 21 17 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4913:15 0 1 9 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 4 4 12 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 4 5 21 22 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6213:30 0 0 11 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1378610000000 26 1 3 18 19 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5413:45 2 6 10 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0388100000000 20 2 9 18 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5014:00 1 4 16 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 3 5 10 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 4 9 26 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6214:15 3 15 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 16 8 11 8 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 19 23 15 11 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 14:30 0 7 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 9 9 9 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 9 16 22 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6914:45 3 3 15 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 4 6 6 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 7 9 21 17 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6215:00 0 3 11 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 3166500000000 21 3 4 17 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4515:15 1 0 13 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 2 11 10 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 2 2 24 21 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6015:30 0 2 17 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1 1 10 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 3 27 29 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 15:45 1 2 9 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 4 1 16 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 5 3 25 23 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6716:00 0 2 12 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 7 8 15 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 7 10 27 32 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7916:15 0 1 12 18 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 4489621000000 34 4 5 20 27 13 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7316:30 0 6 9 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 2 0 9 22 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 2 6 18 38 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7516:45 0 0 12 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 2 0 8 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 2 0 20 33 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6617:00 2 1 12 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 1 7 13 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 2 2 19 23 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6017:15 0 0 9 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 2 1 6 10 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 1 15 30 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5717:30 0 1 7 17 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 2 3 6 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 2 4 13 27 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6017:45 0 0 11 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 4 8 12 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 1 4 19 22 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6118:00 0 0 2 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2 3 5 10 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 2 3 7 24 10 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5018:15 0 1 4 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0257720000000 23 0 3 9 20 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4618:30 0 1 5 22 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 1475310000000 21 1 5 12 27 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5618:45 0 0 5 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1247710000000 22 1 2 9 19 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4519:00 0 0 9 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 1258201000000 19 1 2 14 18 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 19:15 0047110000000 13 0 5 2 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 5 6 20 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3619:30 0 0 3 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0034300000000 10 0 0 6 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2719:45 0045310000000 13 0007310000000 11 0 0 4 12 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2420:00 0074300000000 14 0046200000000 12 0 0 11 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2620:15 0212210000000 8 0148110000000 15 0 3 5 10 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 20:30 0316200000000 12 0215300000000 11 0 5 2 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2320:45 0142100000000 8 0216300000000 12 0358400000000 20 21:00 0055100000000 11 1023010000000 7 1078110000000 1821:15 0002200000000 4 0017110000000 10 0019310000000 14 21:30 0027100000000 10 0002300000000 5 0029400000000 1521:45 0112000000000 4 0021000000000 3 0133000000000 7 22:00 0003200000000 5 1010000000000 2 1013200000000 7
22:15 0001100000000 2 0011000000000 2 0012100000000 4
22:30 0001200000000 3 0010100000000 2 0011300000000 5
22:45 0011000000000 2 2102000000000 5 2113000000000 7
23:00 0002000000000 2 1000210000000 4 1002210000000 6
23:15 0002000000000 2 0002000000000 2 0004000000000 4
23:30 0022100000000 5 0011300000000 5 0033400000000 10
23:45 0001100000000 2 0001100000000 2 0002200000000 4
Totals 33 121 466 632 180 11 0000000 1,443 160 149 407 513 223 31 6000000 1,489 193 270 873 1,145 403 42 6000000 2,932 % of Totals 2% 8% 32% 44% 12% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 11% 10% 27% 34% 15% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 7% 9% 30% 39% 14% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 15‐MINUTE BREAKDOWN

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment D – SWITRS Collision Report

City LA MESA County SAN DIEGO Population 5 Rpt Dist Beat 003 Type CalTrans Dist BadgeLM1253Crash Date 20180427 Time 0255 Day FRI Primary Crash Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Crash Type HEAD-ON Severity INJURY # Killed 0 # Injured 1 Tow Away? Y Process Date 20180813 Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0 Hit and Run Motor Veh Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST LTS Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int Latitude Longitude Local Rpt # 18017189 Case ID 8656753 Primary Rd EL PASO ST Distance(ft)103 Direction W Secondary Rd DALHART AV NCIC 3708 State Hwy? N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy

PARTY INFO VICTIM INFO
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre
Crash
Dir SW Veh Chp Veh Make Year Sp Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip Role Ext Of Inj Age Sex Seat Pos Safety Equip Ejected 1F DRVR 26 M H HBDUNKRGT TURN W A 0100 MITSU 2003 - 3 N - L G DRVR OTH VIS 26 M 1 L G 0

Case Listing

240935 2018 - Av. 2022/2023 Crashes on Dalhart Av and El Paso St, City of La Mesa, San Diego Co.

Report run on: 5/3/2024
Total Count: 1

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment E – Intersection Sight Distance Graphic

DECISION POINT
MEASURED AT A 15'

OFFSET FROM THE EDGE

OF TRAVEL WAY

EL PASO ST

DALHART AVE
180' SSD AVAILABLE
155' SSD AVAILABLE
NORTH
A speed survey conducted on Amarillo Avenue, resulting in an 85th percentile speed of 30 MPH which is used to determine the required Stopping Sight Distance (SSD). Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) required for 30 MPH is 200' for movements from El Paso Street per HDM 201.1.

Right turn and left turn SSD requirements are met for El Paso Street.

Required Stopping Sight Distance
Decision Point
NOTES
LEGEND

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment F – CA-MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets

Warrant Title Standard
1 Eight-Hour Volume The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that 1 of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day. In applying each condition the major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 8 hours. - Condition A Part 1 Part 2 A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100%/80% columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist on the majorstreet and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection, or - Condition B Part 1 Part 2 A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100%/80% columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist on the majorstreet and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection. 2 Four-Hour Volume See Figure 4C-1 in MUTCD.3 Peak Hour Volume This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following 2 categories are met:A. If all 3 of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour of an average day:1. The total stopped time delay experience by the traffic on 1 minor-street approach (1 direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle-hours for a 1-lane approach; or 5 vehicle-hours for a 2-lane approach, and2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (1 direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for 1 moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for 2 moving lanes, and 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vph for intersections with 3 approaches or 800 vph for intersections with 4 or more approaches.B. See Figure 4C-3 in MUTCD. 4 Pedestrian Volume See Page 4C-6 in MUTCD5 School Crossing See Page 4C-6 in MUTCD6 Coordinated Signal System See Page 4C-8 in MUTCD7 Crash Experience The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met:A. Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; andB. 5 or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; andC. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vph given in both the 80% columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1, or the vph in both of the 80% columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80% of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. 8 Roadway Network See page 4C-9 in MUTCD

TRAFFIC SIGNAL VOLUME WARRANT ANALYSIS (2000 MUTCD)
MAJOR STREET: El Paso St EB WB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1
MINOR STREET: Dalhart Ave NB SB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1
CITY, STATE: La Mesa, CA
COMMENTS:

ISOLATED COMMUNITY WITH POPULATION LESS THAN 10,000 (Y OR N): N 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED GREATER THAN 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET (Y OR N): N EB WB Total NB SB Minor Street
Approach Approach Approach Approach Heavy Leg
06:00 AM TO 07:00 AM 30 33 63 7 7
07:00 AM TO 08:00 AM 83 204 287 14 14
08:00 AM TO 09:00 AM 86 116 202 9 9
09:00 AM TO 10:00 AM 74 79 153 9 9
10:00 AM TO 11:00 AM 83 98 181 0 0
11:00 AM TO 12:00 PM 88 83 171 0 0
12:00 PM TO 01:00 PM 113 120 233 0 0
01:00 PM TO 02:00 PM 124 120 244 0 0
02:00 PM TO 03:00 PM 122 170 292 23 23
03:00 PM TO 04:00 PM 119 155 274 6 6
04:00 PM TO 05:00 PM 153 149 302 6 6
05:00 PM TO 06:00 PM 119 140 259 8 8
06:00 PM TO 07:00 PM 96 88 184 5 5
07:00 PM TO 08:00 PM 63 82 145 6 6
08:00 PM TO 09:00 PM 40 48 88 2 2
09:00 PM TO 10:00 PM 31 16 47 2 2
04/29/24
Kimley-Horn and Associates
El Paso St Dalhart Ave
K:\SND_TPTO\095198039-La Mesa Traffic On Call\ALL WAY STOP ANALYSIS\Stop Analysis - El Paso and Dalhart\CAMUTCD Signal Warrants w Graphs.xls \ Intersection Info

TRAFFIC SIGNAL VOLUME WARRANT ANALYSIS (2000 MUTCD)
MAJOR STREET: El Paso St EB WB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1
MINOR STREET: Dalhart Ave NB SB # OF APPROACH LANES: 1
CITY, STATE: La Mesa, CACOMMENTS:ISOLATED COMMUNITY WITH POPULATION LESS THAN 10,000 (Y OR N): N85TH PERCENTILE SPEED GREATER THAN 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET (Y OR N) N MAJOR ST MINOR ST WARRANT 2 WARRANT 3

TWO-WAY

TRAFFIC

TRAFFIC

HEAVY LEG
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
MAIN
LINE
SIDE
STREET
BOTH
MET
Four-Hour Peak Hour
THRESHOLD VALUES 500 150 750 75 400 120 600 60
06:00 AM TO 07:00 AM 63 707:00 AM TO 08:00 AM 287 1408:00 AM TO 09:00 AM 202 909:00 AM TO 10:00 AM 153 910:00 AM TO 11:00 AM 181 011:00 AM TO 12:00 PM 171 012:00 PM TO 01:00 PM 233 001:00 PM TO 02:00 PM 244 002:00 PM TO 03:00 PM 292 2303:00 PM TO 04:00 PM 274 604:00 PM TO 05:00 PM 302 605:00 PM TO 06:00 PM 259 806:00 PM TO 07:00 PM 184 507:00 PM TO 08:00 PM 145 608:00 PM TO 09:00 PM 88 209:00 PM TO 10:00 PM 47 2 3,125 97 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 00 0
4 HRS NEEDED 1 HR NEEDED
NOT

SATISFIED
NOT

SATISFIED
04/29/24
Kimley-Horn and Associates
8 HOURS NEEDED for both Condition A & B
WARRANT 1 - Condition A, Part 1 WARRANT 1 - Condition A, Part 2 WARRANT 1 - Condition B, Part 1

NOT SATISFIED
8 HOURS NEEDED 8 HOURS NEEDED

NOT SATISFIED NOT SATISFIED
WARRANT 1 - Condition B, Part 2
4/29/2024, 2:56 PM
K:\SND_TPTO\095198039-La Mesa Traffic On Call\ALL WAY STOP ANALYSIS\Stop Analysis - El Paso and Dalhart\CAMUTCD Signal Warrants w Graphs.xls \ Calculations Warrants 1,2,3

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619 234 9411 Attachment G – Murray Manor Elementary Safe Routes to School Map

n

EL PASO
BOB

JACKSON

LAKE MURRAY
DUGAN
KELTON
LAIRD

AMARILLO
DALLAS
SAMUEL
ALIDA
ZETA
MANON

BLUE LAKE
TEX
PAT

MICHELLE
KAPPA
DERK

MIDLAND
ZORA

STADLER
CLAY

YORKSHIRE
RAINEY

DALHART

MARENGO
AZTEC
NENTRA
TAU

AVENORRA
LAMBDA
DENTON

BINNEY JEANETTE

KIMBERLY

PRIVATE

TANGLEROD
CHAZ

ABILENE

CARLETTE

COWLES MTN
SARAH

HIGHGATE
WARREN

PRIVATE
CLAY
Murray Manor
Elementary
School
Jackson
Park
ù
ù
í
ææ ææ æ ææ æ
0 0.0625 0.125 F Miles
WSB
WSB
Legend
Crosswalk Monitor
Parent Suggested Routes
Marked Crosswalk
õ 1/4 Mile (5 Min Walk)
n School Entrance
í
ùååCommunity Watch Route
High Visibility Crosswalk
WSB Walking School Bus
Gathering Spot

DATE: May 13, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: POLICE CHIEF'S QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT (JANUARY 2025 - MARCH 2025)
Please see the attached 1
st Quarter Report for 2025.

Quarterly Report
1st Quarter 2025
Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
Prepared by Crime Analysis

1 Crime Trends and Statistics
The first quarter of 2025 concluded with 16.5 total crimes per thousand residents, down from 22.4 in the first quarter of 2024. Violent crime remained unchanged, but property crime decreased by 29% compared to the first quarter of 2024.

FBI Part 1 Crimes, 1st Quarter Year to Date
Historical Violent Crime Comparison, 1st Quarter Year to Date

2 Incidents of homicide increased compared to the same period last year, while rape and aggravated assault declined. In contrast, robberies rose by twenty-two (22) percent. Thirtytwo (32) percent of aggravated assaults during the first quarter of 2025 were domestic violence.

Case Clearances
On February 25, 2025, an unidentified male followed a high school student from the La Mesa Blvd Trolley Station to Helix Charter High School. During the walk, the subject approached the student and demanded that he remove his sweatshirt and backpack.

Fearing for his safety, the victim complied.

Video surveillance from Helix Charter High School captured the subject walking onto campus alongside the victim, carrying the victim's backpack and sweatshirt. As they approached the main staircase at the front of the school, the subject returned the items to the victim before turning around and walking back toward the area of Lowell Street and Normal Avenue.

During this timeframe, the subject also assaulted a female juvenile. He was later apprehended and booked into San Diego Central Jail.

Historical Property Crime Comparison, 1st Quarter Year to Date Compared to the previous first quarter, residential burglary decreased 11.8%, commercial burglary decreased 56.5%, theft decreased 24.7%, and auto theft decreased 44.2%.

3 Case Clearances
On March 19, 2025, at approximately 7:34 PM, officers were dispatched to the 6800 block of Tower Street in response to a report of a male subject attempting to break into a residence. The caller reported that the suspect had removed a window screen and appeared to be trying to gain entry.

La Mesa Police Officers arrived in the area and located a male individual matching the suspect description nearby. The reporting party and witness on scene positively identified him as the person seen attempting to burglarize the residence. Officers examined the property and found multiple window screens on the ground. The suspect was also found to be in possession of burglary tools.

He was arrested and booked into San Diego Central Jail.

Supervised Persons in the City
Registered Sex Offenders
There are currently ninety-four (94) active sex registrants in the city, ten (10) of whom are transient individuals. Throughout the year, patrol officers conduct compliance checks on the registrants living in La Mesa. Four (4) registrants were out of compliance during the first quarter of 2025, meaning they have not completed their annual or monthly check-in and residency verification as required.

Traffic Unit
Traffic Collisions
2025
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr YTD
Total Traffic Collisions 78 78
Collisions Involving Injury 41 41
Total Vehicle Occupants Reporting Injury 54 54
Occupants Reporting Serious Injury 2 2
Fatality 1 1
Top Three Collision Locations

1. Baltimore and El Cajon Boulevard

2. Fletcher Parkway and Grossmont Center Drive

3. Baltimore Drive and Fletcher Parkway

4 Traffic Enforcement Operations 1st Quarter
Date Enforcement Operations Focus Location Total
Officers
1/3/2025 DUI Patrol DUI Enforcement Citywide 2
2/8/2025 DUI Patrol DUI Enforcement Citywide 5
2/9/2025 DUI Patrol DUI Enforcement Citywide 2
2/19/2025 Traffic Enforcement Collison Factors Citywide 4 2/21/2025 Traffic Enforcement Collison Factors Citywide 5 3/19/2025 Traffic Enforcement Collison Factors Citywide 4 School Resource Officers
The School Resource Officer (SRO) attended regular meetings with the Grossmont Union High School SROs and met with school staff as requested regarding numerous issues on campuses throughout the City.

The SRO responded to or initiated over two hundred (200) calls for service. Approximately forty (40) of those calls for service involved a school. The SRO conducted approximately forty (40) traffic stops/bike stops, resulting in education or enforcement, while providing extra traffic patrols during school drop-off and pick-up times. The SRO assisted patrol officers with responding to approximately thirty (30) calls for service. The SRO took eleven (11) new cases, three (3) of which resulted in a detention for mental health evaluation. The SRO closed fifteen (15) cases by various means.

The SROs completed the following additional tasks/trainings:
• Trained staff at Sparrow Academy on the ALICE training model in response to school threats
• Completed vulnerability assessment with staff at Christ Lutheran School • Participated in marijuana awareness presentations with another officer for approximately five hundred and sixty (560) 9th-grade students at Helix Charter High School
• Provided Maryland Avenue Elementary School with Safety Patrol supplies (hard hats and vests)
• Read to Pre-K and Kindergarten students at Journey Christian School • Shadowed Safety Patrol Members at Lemon Avenue Elementary School during morning drop-off
• Storytime with three (3) different grade levels/classes at Rolando Elementary School
• Assisted LMAAC School social worker with home visits for two truant students • Trained staff at St. Martin of Tours Academy on the ALICE Training Model in response to school threats
• Completed vulnerability assessment with staff at Charley Brown Children’s Center • Trained staff at Charley Brown Children’s Center on the ALICE Training Model in response to school threats

5 • Worked with Heartland Fire Inspector to ensure Knox boxes at all schools, public and private, were properly keyed.

Community Engagement and Information Sharing
Social Media
During the first quarter, Crime Prevention supported station tours for third-grade students from La Mesa elementary schools. The team also participated in the "Chicken with a Cop" event at Chick-fil-A, engaging with the community in a fun and welcoming setting.

Events and Presentations
On February 18th, the La Mesa Police Department partnered with Chick-fil-A to host our second "Chicken with a Cop" fundraising event in support of the LMPD Baker to Vegas team. The Baker to Vegas relay race is one of the most positive and enduring events for law enforcement officers, promoting camaraderie, teamwork, and physical fitness. Each team of 20 runners from participating police departments competes over a 120-mile course, with other department members providing safety and support to the runners in an all-volunteer effort. This year, the LMPD again partnered with the National City Police Department to form a composite team. This relay encourages officers to maintain a high fitness level, enhancing their ability to perform their duties effectively. For over 35 years, the Baker to Vegas Relay has brought together thousands of law enforcement personnel to race across the desert in a true test of endurance and spirit.

New Officers
Currently, there are no police recruits at the regional police academy.

Police Academy Graduates
Police Officers Lauren Craven, Zarina Matevosian, Dereje Tegaw, Tyler Servis, and Isaiah Heyman graduated from the Police Academy on March 7, 2025, and entered the Field Training Program.

Social Media Platform Followers
Nextdoor 26,810 La Mesa Residents
Facebook 8,188
X (formerly Twitter) 5,898
Instagram 4,084
Crime Prevention and Outreach Services
Neighborhood Watch Meetings 0
Community Presentations 18
Residential Security Inspections 0
Commercial Security Inspection 0

6 Lateral Police Officers
Lateral Police Officers Brandon Beck and Kevin Hampton were hired during the first quarter of 2025 and are progressing well in the Field Training Program.

Vacancies
The Department currently has two police officer vacancies and one Police Dispatcher vacancy. Applications are being accepted for the following positions: Police Officer Lateral/Academy Graduate and Police Dispatcher. Please visit the City of La Mesa’s website for more information or to apply.

Officer Training
During the first quarter, sworn personnel completed their quarterly firearms qualifications and a less-lethal update course.

Home Team Success Story
During the first quarter of 2025, the HOME Team supported a significant success case involving a male client in his sixties who had been repeatedly observed by the Regional Task Force on Homelessness (RTFH) Outreach Coordinator in the City of La Mesa. The client was enrolled in the HOME Program in August 2024 following a referral.

At the time of enrollment, the client disclosed a longstanding, serious mental health condition and shared that he had not engaged with a mental health provider for over five years. Recognizing the urgency of his behavioral health needs, the HOME Team initiated a connection to East County Mental Health (ECMH), assisting the client with the initial telephone screening and providing transportation to complete the enrollment process.

To promote continuity of care, the HOME Team continued to provide transportation for follow-up ECMH appointments. Due to a combination of health and social risk factors, the client also qualified for Enhanced Care Management (ECM) through his Medi-Cal provider.

The HOME Team facilitated the ECM referral and supported the client through successful enrollment. Thereafter, the HOME Team and ECM provider collaborated to establish access to ongoing primary and preventive healthcare services.

Position Authorized Filled Vacancies
Sworn Officers 70 68 2
Dispatchers 13 12 1
Community Service Officers 5 5 0

7 Subsequently, the client received a Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) match through the Coordinated Entry System (CES). With support from the HOME Team, he obtained and submitted all required documentation—including a state-issued ID, Social Security card, award letter, bank statements, and verification of disability. Once approved by the Housing Commission, the HOME Team assisted in completing and submitting the PSH intake packet.

While awaiting unit availability, the HOME Team maintained consistent weekly contact, continuing to support the client with transportation to medical and behavioral health appointments. On January 21, 2025, the client’s PSH unit became available. The HOME Team provided transportation for the lease signing and subsequently assisted with moving personal belongings from storage into the new unit.

The client now resides in permanent supportive housing, where he has access to ongoing case management and wraparound services through Alpha Project. Rent is capped at 30% of his income, ensuring long-term housing stability. The client was formally exited from the HOME Program in early February 2025, having successfully transitioned to independent, supported living.

Department Demographics
Race/Ethnicity Total Officers Percent of Officers
Asian 2 1.5%
Black or African American 7 10.3
Hispanic or Latino 13 19.1
Pacific Islander 1 1.5
White 45 66.0%
Grand Total 68 100.0%

8 Department Wellness
The Department remains committed to our staff's wellness and offers various resources to our police officers and professional staff. Our Peer Support Team responded to several callouts during the past quarter to support staff impacted by critical incidents. Our Facility Dog, Declan, has also been called upon to provide unconditional love and support to those team members impacted by trauma, stress, and the often-challenging realities of first responder work. The La Mesa Police Department contracts with a local mental health clinician who is culturally competent in assisting first responders with processing life and work trauma. This clinician is an invaluable asset and helps us protect our people so they can continue to protect you.

Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) Reporting
The Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015 prohibits racial and identity profiling by law enforcement and requires all agencies to annually report vehicle and pedestrian stop information, as well as citizen complaints of profiling, to the California Attorney General’s Office. The La Mesa Police Department began collecting stop information in 2022 in compliance with the legislation. Data for 2022 was reported to the Department of Justice at the beginning of the second quarter of 2023, and data for 2023 will be reported to the DOJ during the second quarter of 2024. The latest report from the California RIPA Board can be found on the California Attorney General’s website by following the link:
https://oag.ca.gov/ab953/board/reports
California Incident-Based Reporting
Historically, the La Mesa Police Department has reported crime statistics using the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Summary Statistics program with the FBI. California and the nation have now transitioned to new standardized reporting systems: the California Incident-Based Reporting System (CIBRS) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). These new systems allow for the robust reporting of fifty-two offense types, an increase from 8 offense types under UCR. Reported data includes case details to more accurately analyze crime trends statewide and nationally.

La Mesa Police Department
Quarterly Crime Statistics - 1st Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Homicide 0 1 2 0 2 2 0 N/C
Cleared 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 N/C
Rape 4 5 5 2 2 2 4 -50.0%
Cleared 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Robbery 9 13 10 19 11 11 9 22.2%
Cleared 4 6 3 11 3 3 4 -25.0%
Aggravated Assault 34 50 37 60 32 32 34 -5.9%
Cleared 21 33 25 38 26 26 21 23.8%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Residential 17 8 11 20 15 15 17 -11.8%
Commercial 23 16 23 11 10 10 23 -56.5%
Burglary Total 40 24 34 31 28 28 40 -30.0%
Cleared 6 10 6 7 8 8 6 33.3%
Car Prowl (Included in Theft) 34 26 19 24 21 21 34 -38.2% Theft > $400 92 73 54 58 65 65 92 -29.3%
Theft $400 or less 102 73 75 63 81 81 102 -20.6%
Theft Total 194 146 129 121 146 146 194 -24.7%
Cleared 26 26 14 26 31 31 26 19.2%
Auto Theft 52 37 41 30 29 29 52 -44.2%
Cleared 1 0 2 3 3 3 1 200.0%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Total Violent 47 69 54 81 47 47 47 0.0%
Cleared* 53.2% 56.5% 51.9% 60.5% 66.0% 61.7% 53.2% 16.0% Total Property 286 207 204 182 203 203 286 -29.0%
Cleared* 11.5% 17.4% 10.8% 19.8% 20.7% 20.7% 11.5% 79.3% FBI Index 333 276 258 263 250 250 333 -24.9%
Cleared* 17.4% 27.2% 19.4% 32.3% 29.2% 28.4% 17.4% 63.1% Violent Rate per 1000 Pop. 3.1/K 3.2/K
Property Rate per 1000 Pop. 13.4/K 19.2/K
Index Rate per 1000 Pop. 16.5/K 22.4/K
2024
Violent Crime
Property Crime
Totals
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 04/17/25
*Percentage change by number of crimes cleared.

N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Robbery and Theft - 1st Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Street/Highway 2 6 0 4 1 1 2 -50.0%
Commercial 4 5 7 7 5 5 4 25.0%
Gas or Service Station 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 N/C
Chain Store 2 2 1 3 0 0 2 -100.0%
Residential 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 N/C
Bank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Miscellaneous 1 0 2 4 4 4 1 300.0%
Robbery Total 9 13 10 19 11 11 9 22.2%
Cleared 4 6 3 11 2 2 4 -50.0%
YTD Clearance Rate 18%
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr done 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change
Pocket-Picking 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 N/C
Purse Snatching 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 100.0%
Shoplifting 59 36 35 29 43 43 59 -27.1%
From Motor Vehicles 55 46 41 39 35 35 55 -36.4%
Motor Vehicle Parts & Acc. 38 19 16 12 13 13 38 -65.8%
Bicycles 5 8 3 3 9 9 5 80.0%
From Buildings 24 27 25 23 37 37 24 54.2%
From Coin Operated Mach. 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
All Others 11 6 8 15 6 6 11 -45.5%
Theft Total 194 146 129 121 146 146 194 -24.7%
Cleared 26 26 14 19 31 31 26 19.2%
YTD Clearance Rate 21%
2024
Robbery
Theft
2024 2025
2024
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 10/29/24 N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Patrol Statistics - 1st Quarter 2025
2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Primary 4818 4715 4920 4824 4294 4294 4818 -10.9%
Officer Initiated 2927 1892 2129 1882 2567 2567 2927 -12.3% Reports Taken 1376 1290 1330 1268 1131 1131 1376 -17.8% Arrests Made 349 395 374 424 367 367 349 5.2%
5150 Detentions 112 94 85 76 92 92 112 -17.9%
Citations 473 434 499 448 643 643 473 35.9%
Parking/ Muni Code Citations 113 117 79 112 82 82 113 -27.4% Field Interviews 140 142 182 170 113 113 140 -19.3%
2024 2025
Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 04/17/25 N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Additional Detailed Statistics - 1st Quarter 2025
Robbery Location Type 2025 Cleared % Solved
Street/Highway 12 3 25.0%
Commercial 23 15 65.2%
Gas or Service Station 0 0 N/C
Chain Store 8 3 37.5%
Residential 1 0 0.0%
Bank 0 0 N/C
Miscellaneous 7 3 42.9%
Total 51 24 47.1%
2025 2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Ghost Gun(s) Recovered Incident 0 4 0 0 2 2 0 N/C
Fentanyl Related Incident 4 7 6 4 1 1 4 -75.0%
Naloxone Used Incident 5 3 5 4 1 1 5 -80.0%
Reported Hate Crimes 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 N/C
A single incident may reflected in each appliable category, dependent on incident circumstances. 2025 2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Race 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Religion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Sexual Orientation 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 N/C
Gender 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Citizenship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
None/Unknown Bias 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
2025 2025 2024 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change Communications 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 -100.0%
Violence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Vandalism 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 N/C
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/C
N/C: Not Calculable
There are 37 reportable bias motivations and 14 reportable offensive acts. To facilitate a more readable data table, only the bias motivations and offensive acts for reported hate crimes will be broken down under each category.

Robbery Clearances
Year to Date Totals
2024
Details of Hate Crimes Reported to Law Enforcment
Incidents of Special Study and County Interest
Crimes by Bias Motivation 2024
Crimes by Offensive Act 2024
Each reported hate crime is listed twice, once under the relevant bias motivation and again under the category of offensive act.

Data are only available for incidents reported to the La Mesa Police Department.

Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 04/17/2025
N/A = Not Applicable

La Mesa Police Department
Communications - 1st Quarter 2025
2024 2023 YTD
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr YTD YTD % Change 9-1-1 6656 6924 7490 6832 6366 6366 6656 -4.4%
9-1-1 Answer Time 1 99% 99% 99% 99% 98% 98% 99% -1.0%
Total Calls to the Department 25090 27256 28318 25413 24397 24397 25090 -2.8% Total Calls For Service 2 15369 15225 16308 15001 14933 14933 15369 -2.8% Source:
9-1-1 6074 6300 7069 6535 6077 6077 6074 0.0%
Text 9-1-1 3 32 11 4 9 8 8 32 -75.0%
Non-Emergency 4870 5370 6063 5792 5428 5428 4870 11.5%
Officer Initiated 2928 2270 2582 2444 3206 3206 2928 9.5% Walk Ins 255 262 320 221 223 223 255 -12.5%
HOME 4 443 473 463 458 465 465 443 5.0%
4 The Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement (HOME) is an initiative of the City of La Mesa, in collaboration with the La Mesa Police Department. LMPD Dispatchers route the HOME team (City outreach workers) as primary responders to non-emergency calls for service that do not require a police presence. 2024 2025
2 Calls for Service include all calls that generate agency response and officer initiated contact including, assisting citizens, traffic stops, pedestrian stops, front counter contacts, extra patrol, etc. 3 Capacity to accept texts via 9-1-1 began January 2021. 1 9-1-1 Answer Time indicates the average percentage of 9-1-1 calls answered by the State Ringtime Standard. Beginning 03/01/23, the State Ringtime Standard is 90% within 15 seconds, and 95% within 20 seconds.

Prepared by LMPD Crime Analysis, 04/17/25 N/A = Not Available

DATE: May 13, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ray Sweeney, Chief of Police
VIA: Greg Humora, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOMELESS OUTREACH AND MOBILE ENGAGEMENT ("HOME") PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT (JANUARY 2025 - MARCH 2025)
Please see that attached report for the HOME 1st Quarter 2025.

City of La Mesa
Homeless Outreach &
Mobile Engagement (HOME) Program
Quarterly Report: January – March 2025

HOME Program Overview
The Homeless Outreach and Mobile Engagement (HOME) Team is an initiative of the City of La Mesa and the La Mesa Police Department (LMPD). The HOME Team provides a housing-first and traumainformed approach to addressing homelessness in La Mesa. The HOME Team utilizes progressive engagement and harm reduction to assist individuals who are unable to access homeless services on their own. This report breaks down the the HOME Team efforts and successes during the 1 st quarter
of 2025.

Since the beginning of the quarter, the HOME program outreach specialists have:
• Contacted 95 total individuals experiencing homelessness and newly enrolled 63 adults and 8 children. Many of these newly enrolled adults are one-time contacts that were provided shortterm services as they passed through La Mesa. A total of 18 individuals contacted this quarter were connected to a temporary or permanent home.
• Responded to 465 service calls routed through LMPD dispatch, HOME hotline or city email, and as follow-ups to previous contacts. Historically, many of these calls would have been handled by city emergency response services and law enforcement. • Prioritized the most vulnerable individuals in the City of La Mesa, including individuals living on the street with chronic physical and mental health conditions, households with children, and individuals facing chronic homelessness.

Clients Served
The HOME Team operates out of LMPD headquarters in downtown La Mesa and responds to nonemergency calls for service related to homelessness that are generated through police dispatch, HOME email, and The HOME Hotline. Each of these calls is first attended by a HOME Team outreach specialist; PD or PERT officers are only requested for rare cases involving legal or safety concerns. 71 24
Total Number of Clients Served
New Clients in Quarter Continuing Clients
95 Instances of
Service*
476
Calls for
Service
465
HOME Team Assistance: 11
# of Calls LMPD Officers
requested HOME assistance
# of Calls the HOME team
requested:

Officer Assistance: 5
PERT Assistance: 1
*Instances of service are included in the total calls for service. This number represent interactions with clients that are enrolled in the county’s case management system. More than one client may be present during a single call for service.

Client Demographics and Household Composition
Housing Outcomes
8 household (18 people) people left the HOME program to a temporary or permanent placement during the quarter.
2 households (3 persons) exited to temporary housing, defined as an emergency shelter, transitional housing, or other location that provides housing/shelter without tenure.
6 households (15 people) exited to permanent housing, defined as a leased unit meeting United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) occupancy standards with or without supportive services, such as mental health counseling.
6 housing matches was provided through the Coordinated Entry System.

Single Person
Households
79 Adult Couple
Households
6 8
39 56
0 20
40 60
Female Male
13 6
13 17 18
14 13
1 0 to 17 18 to 24
25 to 34 35 to 44
45 to 54 55 to 64
65 or Above Unknown
Total Clients Served Demographics
Chronically
Homeless
51% Households
with Children
55

Housing Matches
Housing matches provided through the Coordinated Entry System (CES) are an essential part of people attempting to access permanent housing. In short, a housing match is when a person is connected to a housing provider for assistance in the form of a subsidized room or ongoing rental assistance. Once a person has been matched through CES, the HOME Team does their best to help a client connect with the housing provider to complete the housing process. During this quarter, the HOME Team received 6 housing matches. Connecting people to housing without matches continues to be a significant struggle for the HOME Team.

Client Services
The HOME Team continues to excel in helping clients navigate and connect with a variety of existing services within the community. Some of these services include ongoing nutritional, medical, and financial support through programs such as Cal-Fresh, Medical, and General Relief.

The HOME Team was able to connect multiple people with these services by transporting and supporting these clients in navigating these services at the Family Resource Centers located in Lemon Grove and El Cajon.

The HOME Team has continued to provide housing navigation throughout this quarter. Housing navigation aids individuals who have an income, housing voucher, or rental assistance subsidies that could support a rental unit on an ongoing basis. The HOME Team Housing Navigator works with these clients to identify suitable units, pay for application fees, advocate to landlords, and provide financial assistance to cover the move-in costs related to the rental unit. This position was filled by Home Start in January of 2025. The addition of the Housing Navigator position has already yielded great results.

The Housing Navigator was able to assist a family of three and a family of five move into units utilizing the city’s one-time rental assistance program. Both of these families worked with the HOME Team prior to the onboarding of the Housing Navigator; however, it was not until the Housing Navigator was able to connect with landlords on a more consistent basis that these families were able to be accepted into rental units.

The HOME Team also continues to assist with acquiring identifying documentation. Almost all of the clients who successfully exited the program during this quarter worked with the HOME Team to acquire both State Identification cards and/ or Social Security Cards; attaining these documents was a necessity for their housing placements.

The HOME Team has continued working closely with a non-profit: 2 nd Chance. This non-profit provides
a Job Readiness Training (JRT) course for clients who struggle with connecting to employment due to their homelessness status and/ or involvement with the justice system. As part of the JRT, the participants are provided with professional interview attire. During the last week of JRT, the participants take part in a round of interviews with potential employers including but not limited to Western Towing, ACE Parking, and Sycuan Casino.

The HOME Team having consistent access to available transportation continues to be an important resource for clients. During the quarter, the HOME Team utilized the van to view units for rent in El Cajon, Downtown San Diego, and San Diego County. Being able to go to units quickly and with little notice has resulted in clients being able to successfully exit our program into rental assistance programs. The HOME Team has also utilized these vehicles to clear encampments by taking clients

and their belongings to storage, housing opportunities, or alternative camping locations. Most importantly, the van is accessible to people that have disabilities or are experiencing mobility issues.

During this quarter, the HOME Team has provided some form of financial and/or basic-needs assistance to all enrolled clients with the dual objectives of moving them toward a housing outcome and keeping them safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. These objectives have not changed throughout this quarter.

All clients received COVID-19-related services, including updates related to local public-health guidelines, vaccine information, hygiene supplies, and personal protective equipment (PPE), such as face masks and hand sanitizer.

All clients received food, water, or other nutrition services, with approximately 95 prioritized for on-going meal support.

HOME program staff distributed 10,007.91 in direct financial assistance, including vehicle repair, and funds used to secure new rental units. 3 households (9 persons) received accommodation in a motel, designed to provide short-term, bridge shelter for those with a concrete housing plan.

HOME program staff arranged 58 rides to apartment viewings, shelter stays, program intake interviews, and other critical appointments via ridesharing service.
10 Clients were connected to ongoing physical, mental, and/or behavioral healthcare.
8 Instances of clients connected to CA ID, Birth Certificate, and/ or Social Security Card.
3 Instances of clients connected to Cal Fresh and/ or Medi-Cal. 4 of clients connected to Serving Seniors.

4 Instances of people enrolled into employment training and support Ongoing Care
Throughout the life of the program, HOME has noticed that the majority of calls related to someone experiencing homelessness were generated because of another community members concern for a person’s mental, physical, or behavioral health. Because of this, the HOME Team has prioritized connecting people to ongoing healthcare through organizations such as Family Health Centers, East County Behavioral Health, Jane Westin, Alvarado Parkway Institute, and Volunteers in Medicine. All of these organizations provide low to no-cost services to people experiencing homelessness. Connecting people to ongoing and preventative care such as what is being offered at these organizations is essential to addressing issues that invariably result in emergent health situations for people experiencing homelessness. These situations result in over-burdend emergency rooms, ambulances, and other emergency services. Additionally, due to the limited nature of HOME services provided to a person after they are housed, having connections to ongoing community support is an important part of someone maintaining housing stability. The HOME Team has also made efforts to connect people to Enhanced Care Management (ECM). ECM is a California initiative to reduce high utilizations of emergency services and healthcare. ECM provides clients with tailored medical case management aimed at preventative healthcare and chronic disease management. People experiencing homelessness has been identified as a population of focus for this program by the State of California. two individuals were connected to ECM during the quarter.

Calls for Service
The HOME Team responded to 465 calls for service during the quarter. This number includes service calls routed through LMPD dispatch, HOME hotline or city email, and follow-ups to previous contacts.

Of these calls for service, 70 calls were new requests for assistance related to homelessness in the City. Historically, these calls would have been addressed by city emergency response services and law enforcement.

Of these calls, 189 were direct responses to calls to the HOME hotline and email requests made by community members regarding someone experiencing homelessness.

Additionally, 299 calls were service driven appointments with clients or proactive rapport-building contacts, in support of the HOME Team’s mission.

During the entirety of this quarter, the HOME Team was connected to the La Mesa Police Department’s dispatch center via police radio. Starting the 4th quarter of 2021, the HOME Team has been able to realize the benefits of the technology and partnerships with call-takers through decreased response times to current calls for service, improved support to police officers, enhanced understanding of the program workload and service provision through data tracking, and improved safety of the HOME Team members and the community.

Hotel Utilization
The HOME Team provided a hotel stay for three households (nine people) during the quarter. One of these households consisted of a single veteran who needed some bridge shelter in order to charge their phone and order income documents. After this stay, the veteran was able to begin self-paying at a motel while working towards family reunification. The other two households were provided hotel stays as a form of bridge housing. There are times when households have a move-in date scheduled that is, at times, a week or a few days away. The HOME Team is able to utilize local motels as a form of shelter to bridge this gap. This service is a crucial benefit for people that have a scheduled move-in date. This bridge housing assists in allowing the client to keep their phones charged, meet regularly with HOME Housing Navigator, and present at lease signing/ final walkthrough as clean, showered, and presentable.

Fresh Start Saturdays
The Fresh Start program was initially named 'Homeless Breakfast' before it evolved into the comprehensive operation it is today. In recent years, the program has served an average of 35 people per month; however, this year, attendance has increased, resulting in a surge to 148 individuals being served. This growth can be attributed not only to the rising population of individuals experiencing homelessness but also to the care and hospitality provided to those in need. The program's volunteers include church members and community volunteers, emphasizing that addressing homelessness is a collective community effort.

In this quarter, the HOME team began attending the shower events organized by Fresh Start. Since the HOME team's involvement, 15 individuals receiving services there have enrolled in the program. A significant number of these clients do not reside within the City of La Mesa's borders, but it is essential for them to connect with a program that supports their housing goals and enrollment in the Coordinated Entry System (CES).

The presence of the HOME team at Fresh Start events has introduced a new city perspective and brought awareness to those in need. Initially, many individuals were hesitant and did not trust the program, comparing it to others with similar claims. However, over time, more individuals began to approach the HOME team to discuss their VISPDAT, inquire about services, and confirm available resources. Many of these individuals have been homeless for over three years and have not had ongoing case management.

The involvement of the HOME team has significantly improved the way these clients receive services and stay connected. So far, four individuals who participated in these events have been matched with housing voucher opportunities. One client expressed it best: “I remember I didn’t want to talk to you because I didn’t trust you, but I’m glad I did because now I have this voucher.” Client success stories
One of the HOME Team success stories this quarter involves a man in his sixties who was referred to the HOME Team by the Regional Task Force on Homelessness (RTFH) Outreach Coordinator after seeing this individual multiple time in the City of La Mesa area. The HOME Team enrolled this individual in August of 2024. During the enrollment session, this person disclosed that they were struggling with a serious mental health diagnosis and they had not been in touch with a mental health

provider in, at least, five years. Taking this into account, the HOME Team began the process of connecting this client with East County Mental Health (ECMH). The HOME Team assisted the client with completing the over-the-phone screening before providing transportation to their enrollment. To assist this client with staying connected, the HOME Team provided transportation to ECMH appointments. Due to a combination of social determinants of health disparities this client was also eligible for Enhanced Care Management (ECM) through his Medi-Cal provider. The HOME Team completed this client’s ECM referral, and was able to assist them with enrolling with their ECM provider. After assisting this client with enrolling in ECM, the ECM and HOME Team collaborated on getting this client connected to ongoing physical healthcare. This client received a Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) match through the Coordinated Entry System. After receiving this match, this client worked closely with the HOME Team to acquire and submit required documents including state identification, social security card, social security award letter, bank statements, and disability certification. Once these documents were submitted and approved by the housing commission, the HOME Team, assisted this client with completing and submitting their PSH intake packet. While waiting for the unit to become available, the HOME Team continued to meet with this client on a weekly basis and provide transportation to ECMH and other Dr. appointments. This clients PSH unit became available on 1/21/25. The HOME Team provided transportation to the client to get to the unit and sign the lease. Once the client moved into their unit, the HOME Team assisted this client with emptying their storage and transporting their belongings into their PSH unit. While in this unit, the client will have access to ongoing supportive services provided by Alpha Project, and the rent will be 30% of the total income. This client was, ultimately, exited from the HOME Program in the beginning of February.

Another HOME success story for this quarter involves a woman in her thirties who enrolled with HOME after the HOME Team responded to a community request regarding an encampment on City of La Mesa property. When speaking with the HOME Team, this client expressed an interest in going to the East County Transitional Living Center program. The HOME Team assisted this client with obtaining thirty days’ worth of their medications before scheduling an intake. After being at ECTLC for a few days, this client decided that the program was not a good fit for them and decided to leave.

After reconnecting with the HOME Team, the client explored the idea of moving into a shared housing option with their significant other and their significant others’ parent who were also experiencing homelessness at the time. This household began meeting with the HOME Team housing navigator on a regular basis to explore possible rental units, create a budget that would allow them to afford rent as well as other essentials, and pay for application fees for possible units to rent. These clients and the Housing Navigator were able to identify an affordable unit, and the Housing Navigator was able to work with the apartment to collect all of the necessary documents to get a check processed. This client was able to move into their unit on 3/6/25. Client is pictured below with some move-in supplies provided from the HOME Team.

Community Support Partnerships
• Journey Community Church continues to provide any and all food items to the HOME Program, allowing HOME staff to feed up to 60 people per week
• La Mesa Village Association
• La Mesa Thrift Shop
• La Mesa First United Methodist Church
• Empire Thrift Store of El Cajon
• Eagle Scouts
Community Resource Partnerships
• Home-Start, Inc.
• East County Behavioral Health
• Center Star ACT
• McAlister Inc.
• La Mesa – Spring Valley School District Social Workers • East County Homeless Task Force

• San Diego County Mental Health
• In addition, HOME staff has developed a word-of-mouth network of donors and residents and regularly interface with anyone interested in helping those facing hardship on the streets of La Mesa.
• Assisted Replacement Medication Therapy Medical Specialists • The Lodge of La Mesa (Transition Age Youth)
• Borrego Health-Centro Medico El Cajon
• New Found Homes ILF
• Mission Academy
• 2
nd Chance
• Alvarado Parkway Institute
• Bayview Crisis Stabilization Unit
• Volunteers in Medicine
• Serving Seniors

HOME Program Historical Statistics
Client Enrollment
Quarter Total Clients
Served New Clients Continuing Clients
Q4 2020 56 n/a n/a
Q1 2021 108 61 47
Q2 2021 75 44 31
Q3 2021 86 44 31
Q4 2021 25 10 15
Q1 2022 69 48 21
Q2 2022 96 62 34
Q3 2022 73 38 35
Q4 2022 108 65 43
Q1 2023 71 28 43
Q2 2023 72 53 19
Q3 2023 71 43 28
Q4 2023 56 27 29
Q1 2024 43 29 14
Q2 2024 40 21 19
Q3 2024 39 24 15
Q4 2024 57 40 17
Q1 2025 95 24 71
Grand Total 1240 661 512

Calls for Service
Quarter Instances of
Service1 Calls for Service
Calls Officers
requested HOME
Assistance
Calls HOME
requested Officer
Assistance
Calls HOME
requested PERT
assistance
Q4 2020 191 110 --- 1 1
Q1 2021 397 187 --- 0 1
Q2 2021 349 355 --- 0 0
Q3 2021 393 134 --- 0 0
Q4 2021 237 81 --- 0 0
Q1 2022 373 617 24 10 0
Q2 2022 626 657 11 22 4
Q3 2022 584 549 26 5 1
Q4 2022 744 417 16 3 0
Q1 2023 633 435 19 7 0
Q2 2023 494 384 16 2 0
Q3 2023 173 447 12 3 0
Q4 2023 274 391 24 3 0
Q1 2024 273 443 19 2 0
Q2 2024 261 473 13 9 0
Q3 2024 244 463 23 12 0
Q4 2024 358 448 10 5 0
Q1 2025 476 465 11 5 1
Grand Total 7080 7056 224 89 8
1 Instances of service are included in the total calls for service. This number represent interactions with clients that are enrolled in the county’s case management system. More than one client may be present during a single call for service.

Services and Housing
Quarter HOME
Rides
Direct
Financial
Assistance
Clients who
Received Motel
Vouchers
Clients
Permanently
Housed
Households
Permanently
Housed
Clients
Temporarily
Housed
Households
Temporarily
Housed
Q4 2020 18 $ 3,357.00 7 5 --- 3 ---
Q1 2021 16 $ 10,506.00 7 --- 4 --- 19
Q2 2021 7 $ 4,967.00 9 8 7 --- 5
Q3 2021 144 $ 16,623.42 7 8 3 --- 5
Q4 2021 84 $ 1,071.40 0 12 11 --- 4
Q1 2022 92 $ 6,579.56 5 10 9 6 6
Q2 2022 96 $ 3,727.96 2 16 11 5 3
Q3 2022 68 $ 3,445.75 3 8 6 4 4
Q4 2022 69 $ 3,411.55 3 15 6 2 2
Q1 2023 56 $ 2,210.47 2 17 7 2 2
Q2 2023 59 $ 2,581.44 0 4 2 5 5
Q3 2023 59 $ 7,560.47 2 2 2 6 6
Q4 2023 91 $ 1,344.96 1 10 8 1 1
Q1 2024 52 $ 3,506.91 1 7 6 1 7
Q2 2024 86 $ 8,428.53 0 9 4 5 5
Q3 2024 61 $ 20,935.20 1 4 2 2 2
Q4 2024 56 $ 8,895.15 1 7 7 2 2
Q5 2025 58 $ 10,007.91 0 15 6 3 8
Grand Total 1172 119,160.68 51 157 101 47 86
Total People Housed: 204

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025

COMPENSATION PLAN
DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION APPROVING SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 COMPENSATION

PLAN FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER

CLASSIFICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM

MANAGER CLASSIFICATION TITLE CHANGE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Human Resources
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving salary adjustments to the Compensation Plan for FY 2024-25 for Community Services Manager classification and title change to the Environmental Program Manager classification?
Recommendation:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving salary adjustments to the Compensation Plan for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the Community Services Manager and title change for the Environmental Program Manager.

Fiscal Impact:

The maximum annual fiscal impact for the salary adjustment to the Community Services Manager is $48,797 and there is no fiscal impact to the title change of the Environmental Program Manager.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 2 of 3
City’s Strategic Goals:
 Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
 Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.

DISCUSSION:

Community Services Manager:

With the recent appointment of a new Director of Community Services, the department has initiated a strategic review of its organizational structure to align with updated priorities, improved service delivery, and operational efficiency.

As part of this restructuring, it was determined that an existing classification – Community Services Manager – was identified as a key role that had not been budgeted or filled in recent years. In addition, due to updates in the operational needs of the department, the job description for this position was reviewed and updated to better reflect current expectations, duties and qualifications. As a result of the updates, staff recommend adjusting the annual salary range from $99,778 - $121,285 to $117,124 -142,355 to more closely reflect the duties of the position once filled.

Environmental Program Manager Title Change:

Human Resources staff recently conducted a classification audit related to positions in the Environmental Services Division of the Department of Public Works. Staff recommend changing the title of Environmental Program Manager to Environmental Program Coordinator to represent job duties that focus on operational and logistical aspects, as opposed to the broader responsibilities and decision-making focus of a manager classification. The class and compensation of the Environmental Program Coordinator would align with the City’s other program coordinator roles, Community Development Program Coordinator and Emergency Preparedness Coordinator. The classification would remain a represented position in the La Mesa City Employees Association bargaining unit with no salary changes.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Gretchen Spaniol
City Manager Director of Human Resources
Attachments:

A. Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Mesa Approving Salary Adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Compensation Plan for Community Services Manager and Environmental Program Manager Classification Title

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
APPROVING SALARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025

COMPENSATION PLAN FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER

CLASSIFICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGER
CLASSIFICATION TITLE CHANGE.

WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa is a general law city which derives its power from state law and uses State Governmental Code to enumerate the City’s powers and form of government.

The City of La Mesa employs a Council-Manager form of government. In this arrangement, the City Council is responsible for determining policy, and the City Manager ensures that such policy is implemented; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 20636 and California Code of Regulations Section 570.5 require California Public Employee Retirement System member agencies to maintain and post publicly available pay schedules.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, as follows:

1. That the City Council desires to amend the City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for FY 2024-2025 to reflect salary adjustments to the Community Services Manager to amend the annual salary from $99,778 - $121,285 to $117,124 – $142,355 and a title change for Environmental Program Manager classification to Environmental Program Coordinator.

2. The compensation for all City of La Mesa employees as set forth and prescribed in the City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, listing classifications, salary ranges/bands, and pay steps is hereby approved and accepted. A copy of said compensation plan is attached hereto and made part of hereof by reference, as though the same were set forth in full herein.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the position listings, salary ranges/bands, and pay steps as set forth in the City of La Mesa Compensation Plan for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 shall be in full force and effect.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of May 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Accountant I 5,531 31.91 5,808 33.51 6,098 35.18 6,403 36.94 6,723 38.79 7,059 40.73 7,235 41.74 LMCEA 1000 8810 35 Accountant II 6,088 35.12 6,392 36.88 6,712 38.72 7,048 40.66 7,400 42.69 7,770 44.83 7,964 45.95 LMCEA 1003 8810 46Accounting Assistant I 3,535 20.39 3,712 21.42 3,898 22.49 4,093 23.61 4,298 24.80 4,513 26.04 4,626 26.69 LMCEA 1006 8810 3Accounting Assistant II 3,883 22.40 4,077 23.52 4,281 24.70 4,495 25.93 4,720 27.23 4,956 28.59 5,080 29.31 LMCEA 1009 8810 6Accounting Technician 5,246 30.27 5,508 31.78 5,783 33.36 6,072 35.03 6,376 36.78 6,695 38.63 6,862 39.59 LMCEA 1012 8810 33Administrative Aide 4,611 26.60 4,842 27.93 5,084 29.33 5,338 30.80 5,605 32.34 5,885 33.95 6,032 34.80 LMCEA 1015 8810 21Administrative Analyst I 5,531 31.91 5,808 33.51 6,098 35.18 6,403 36.94 6,723 38.79 7,059 40.73 7,235 41.74 LMCEA 1018 8810 35Administrative Analyst II 6,088 35.12 6,392 36.88 6,712 38.72 7,048 40.66 7,400 42.69 7,770 44.83 7,964 45.95 LMCEA 1021 8810 46Administrative Coordinator 4,906 28.30 5,151 29.72 5,409 31.21 5,679 32.76 5,963 34.40 6,261 36.12 6,418 37.03 LMCEA 1024 8810 25Administrative Office Assistant 3,782 21.82 3,971 22.91 4,170 24.06 4,379 25.26 4,598 26.53 4,828 27.85 4,949 28.55 LMCEA 1027 8810 5Assistant Center Manager 4,285 24.72 4,499 25.96 4,724 27.25 4,960 28.62 5,208 30.05 5,468 31.55 5,605 32.34 LMCEA 1033 8810 15Assistant Engineer 6,961 40.16 7,309 42.17 7,674 44.27 8,058 46.49 8,461 48.81 8,884 51.25 9,106 52.53 LMCEA 1039 9410 54Assistant Planner 6,125 35.34 6,431 37.10 6,753 38.96 7,091 40.91 7,446 42.96 7,818 45.10 8,013 46.23 LMCEA 1042 9410 48Associate Engineer 8,022 46.28 8,423 48.59 8,844 51.02 9,286 53.57 9,750 56.25 10,238 59.07 10,494 60.54 LMCEA 1045 9410 56Associate Planner 6,738 38.87 7,075 40.82 7,429 42.86 7,800 45.00 8,190 47.25 8,600 49.62 8,815 50.86 LMCEA 1048 9410 53Building Inspector I 5,566 32.11 5,844 33.72 6,136 35.40 6,443 37.17 6,765 39.03 7,103 40.98 7,281 42.01 LMCEA 1051 9410 36Building Inspector II 6,123 35.33 6,429 37.09 6,750 38.94 7,088 40.89 7,442 42.93 7,814 45.08 8,009 46.21 LMCEA 1054 9410 49Building Maintenance Lead Worker 5,173 29.84 5,432 31.34 5,704 32.91 5,989 34.55 6,288 36.28 6,602 38.09 6,767 39.04 LMCEA 1057 9420 31Building Maintenance Supervisor 6,116 35.28 6,422 37.05 6,743 38.90 7,080 40.85 7,434 42.89 7,806 45.03 8,001 46.16 LMCEA 1060 9420 47Building Maintenance Worker I 4,276 24.67 4,490 25.90 4,715 27.20 4,951 28.56 5,199 29.99 5,459 31.49 5,595 32.28 LMCEA 1063 9420 13Building Maintenance Worker II 4,705 27.14 4,940 28.50 5,187 29.93 5,446 31.42 5,718 32.99 6,004 34.64 6,154 35.50 LMCEA 1066 9420 23Business License Officer 4,274 24.66 4,488 25.89 4,712 27.18 4,948 28.55 5,195 29.97 5,455 31.47 5,591 32.26 LMCEA 1072 9410 14Clerical Assistant I 3,117 17.98 3,273 18.88 3,437 19.83 3,609 20.82 3,789 21.86 3,978 22.95 4,077 23.52 LMCEA 1093 8810 1Clerical Assistant II 3,364 19.41 3,532 20.38 3,709 21.40 3,894 22.47 4,089 23.59 4,293 24.77 4,400 25.38 LMCEA 1096 8810 2Clinical Homeless Outreach Specialist 6,802 39.24 7,142 41.20 7,499 43.26 7,874 45.43 8,268 47.70 8,681 50.08 8,898 51.33 LMCEA 1097 9420 61Code Compliance Officer I 5,093 29.38 5,348 30.85 5,615 32.39 5,896 34.02 6,191 35.72 6,501 37.51 6,664 38.45 LMCEA 1099 9410 28Code Compliance Officer II 5,607 32.35 5,887 33.96 6,181 35.66 6,490 37.44 6,815 39.32 7,156 41.28 7,335 42.32 LMCEA 1102 9410 39Community Cleanup Coordinator 4,968 28.66 5,216 30.09 5,477 31.60 5,751 33.18 6,039 34.84 6,341 36.58 6,500 37.50 LMCEA 1107 9420 26Comm Develop Program Coordinator 6,999 40.38 7,349 42.40 7,716 44.52 8,102 46.74 8,507 49.08 8,932 51.53 9,155 52.82 LMCEA 1105 9410 55Community Resource Supervisor 6,802 39.24 7,142 41.20 7,499 43.26 7,874 45.43 8,268 47.70 8,681 50.08 8,898 51.33 LMCEA 1103 9410 61Crime Analyst 6,009 34.67 6,309 36.40 6,624 38.22 6,955 40.13 7,303 42.13 7,668 44.24 7,860 45.35 LMCEA 1111 8810 45Community Engagement Specialist I 4,351 25.10 4,569 26.36 4,797 27.68 5,037 29.06 5,289 30.51 5,553 32.04 5,692 32.84 LMCEA 1114 9410 16Community Engagement Specialist II 5,093 29.38 5,348 30.85 5,615 32.39 5,896 34.02 6,191 35.72 6,501 37.51 6,664 38.45 LMCEA 1117 9410 28Custodian 3,364 19.41 3,532 20.38 3,709 21.40 3,894 22.47 4,089 23.59 4,293 24.77 4,400 25.38 LMCEA 1120 9420 2Customer Service / Finance Assistant 3,962 22.86 4,160 24.00 4,368 25.20 4,586 26.46 4,815 27.78 5,056 29.17 5,182 29.90 LMCEA 1123 8810 7Customer Service Specialist I 4,162 24.01 4,370 25.21 4,589 26.48 4,818 27.80 5,059 29.19 5,312 30.65 5,445 31.41 LMCEA 1126 8810 11Customer Service Specialist II 4,490 25.90 4,715 27.20 4,951 28.56 5,199 29.99 5,459 31.49 5,732 33.07 5,875 33.89 LMCEA 1129 8810 17Deputy City Clerk 5,370 30.98 5,639 32.53 5,921 34.16 6,217 35.87 6,528 37.66 6,854 39.54 7,025 40.53 LMCEA 1132 8810 34Deputy Fire Marshal 7,105 40.99 7,460 43.04 7,833 45.19 8,225 47.45 8,636 49.82 9,068 52.32 9,295 53.63 LMCEA 1135 9410 64Development Services Technician I 4,524 26.10 4,750 27.40 4,988 28.78 5,237 30.21 5,499 31.73 5,774 33.31 5,918 34.14 LMCEA 1148 9410 19Development Services Technician II 4,968 28.66 5,216 30.09 5,477 31.60 5,751 33.18 6,039 34.84 6,341 36.58 6,500 37.50 LMCEA 1149 9410 57Downtown Operations Assistant 4,107 23.69 4,312 24.88 4,528 26.12 4,754 27.43 4,992 28.80 5,242 30.24 5,373 31.00 LMCEA 1147 9410 9Emergency Preparedness Coordinator 6,999 40.38 7,349 42.40 7,716 44.52 8,102 46.74 8,507 49.08 8,932 51.53 9,155 52.82 LMCEA 1184 9410 62Engineering Aide 4,524 26.10 4,750 27.40 4,988 28.78 5,237 30.21 5,499 31.73 5,774 33.31 5,918 34.14 LMCEA 1150 9410 19Engineering Technician I 5,106 29.46 5,361 30.93 5,629 32.48 5,910 34.10 6,206 35.80 6,516 37.59 6,679 38.53 LMCEA 1156 9410 29Engineering Technician II 5,612 32.38 5,893 34.00 6,188 35.70 6,497 37.48 6,822 39.36 7,163 41.33 7,342 42.36 LMCEA 1159 9410 40Environmental Program Coordinator 44.73 7,754 8,142 46.97 8,549 49.32 8,976 51.78 9,425 54.38 9,896 57.09 10,143 58.52 LMCEA 1160 9420 58Environmental Specialist 6,143 35.44 6,450 37.21 6,773 39.08 7,112 41.03 7,468 43.08 7,841 45.24 8,037 46.37 LMCEA 1355 9420 50Equipment Operator 4,756 27.44 4,994 28.81 5,244 30.25 5,506 31.77 5,781 33.35 6,070 35.02 6,222 35.90 LMCEA 1162 9420 24Equipment Service Worker 3,730 21.52 3,917 22.60 4,113 23.73 4,319 24.92 4,535 26.16 4,762 27.47 4,881 28.16 LMCEA 1165 9420 4Executive Secretary to the Police Chief 4,906 28.30 5,151 29.72 5,409 31.21 5,679 32.76 5,963 34.40 6,261 36.12 6,418 37.03 LMCEA 1023 8810 25 City of La Mesa
Compensation Plan - LMCEA FY 2024-2025
EFFECTIVE: 7/5/24, AS AMENDED & APPROVED on 05/13/2025
Class
Code WC Code Range #
Step G
Class Title Payroll Group
Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step F

Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly City Councilmember 1,900 Elected 1084 9410 2
City Treasurer 1,100 Elected 1090 8810 1Mayor 3,800 Elected 1234 9410 3 Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Accounting Technician - Confidential 5,508 31.78 5,783 33.36 6,072 35.03 6,376 36.78 6,695 38.63 7,030 40.56 7,206 41.57 Conf 1000 8810 35 Administrative Analyst I - Confidential 5,807 33.50 6,097 35.18 6,402 36.93 6,722 38.78 7,058 40.72 7,411 42.76 7,596 43.82 Conf 1003 8810 46Administrative Analyst II - Confidential 6,392 36.88 6,712 38.72 7,048 40.66 7,400 42.69 7,770 44.83 8,159 47.07 8,363 48.25 Conf 1006 8810 3Administrative Coordinator -Confidential 5,151 29.72 5,409 31.21 5,679 32.76 5,963 34.40 6,261 36.12 6,574 37.93 6,738 38.87 Conf 1009 8810 6Executive Assistant to the City Manager 6,092 35.15 6,397 36.91 6,717 38.75 7,053 40.69 7,406 42.73 7,776 44.86 7,970 45.98 Conf 1012 8810 33Human Resources Analyst 6,776 39.09 7,115 41.05 7,471 43.10 7,845 45.26 8,237 47.52 8,649 49.90 8,865 51.14 Conf 1015 8810 21Human Resources Assistant 3,975 22.93 4,174 24.08 4,383 25.29 4,602 26.55 4,832 27.88 5,074 29.27 5,201 30.01 Conf 1018 8810 35Human Resources Technician 5,271 30.41 5,535 31.93 5,812 33.53 6,103 35.21 6,408 36.97 6,728 38.82 6,896 39.78 Conf 1021 8810 46 Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Monthly Hourly Assistant City Manager 15,414 88.93 93.38 16,185 16,994 98.04 17,844 102.95 108.09 18,736 NS Mgmt 1036 9410 Assistant Director of Community Development 11,661 67.28 70.64 12,244 12,856 74.17 13,499 77.88 81.77 14,174 NS Mgmt 1146 9410Assistant Director of Public Works 11,661 67.28 70.64 12,244 12,856 74.17 13,499 77.88 81.77 14,174 NS Mgmt 1145 9410Assistant to the City Manager 9,760 56.31 59.12 10,248 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 68.44 11,863 NS Mgmt 1037 9410Building Inspection Supervisor 8,232 47.49 49.87 8,644 9,076 52.36 9,530 54.98 57.73 10,007 NS Mgmt 1055 9410Building Official 11,455 66.09 69.39 12,028 12,629 72.86 13,260 76.50 80.33 13,923 NS Mgmt 1069 9410City Attorney 151.68 26,291 NS Mgmt 1078 8810City Clerk 10,353 59.73 62.72 10,871 11,415 65.86 11,986 69.15 72.61 12,585 NS Mgmt 1081 8810City Engineer 11,661 67.28 70.64 12,244 12,856 74.17 13,499 77.88 81.77 14,174 NS Mgmt 1086 9410City Manager 143.55 24,882 NS Mgmt 1087 9410Communications Manager 9,760 56.31 59.12 10,248 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 68.44 11,863 NS Mgmt 1106 8810Community Services Manager 9,760 56.31 59.12 10,248 10,760 62.08 11,298 65.18 68.44 11,863 NS Mgmt 1140 9410 Range #
City of La Mesa
Compensation Plan - Elected Officials FY 2024-2025
EFFECTIVE: 12/10/24, AS AMENDED & APPROVED on 11/26/2024 City of La Mesa
Compensation Plan - Confidential Staff FY 2024-2025
EFFECTIVE: 7/5/24, AS AMENDED & APPROVED on 6/25/2024
City of La Mesa
Compensation Plan - Management Groups FY 2024-2025
EFFECTIVE: 7/5/24, AS AMENDED & APPROVED 05/13/2025
Step E Step F Step G
Payroll Group Class Code WC Code
Salary Established by Contract Amended 8/13/24 (Effective 7/5/24)Salary Established by Contract Amended 8/13/24 (Effective 7/5/24) Class Title
Step A Step B Step C Step D
Class Title
Step A Step B Step C Step D
Salary established by ordinance 2023-2905 (Eff 12/10/24)Salary established by ordinance 2023-2905 (Eff 12/10/24)Salary established by ordinance 2023-2905 (Eff 12/10/24) Range #
Step E Step F Step G
Payroll Group Class Code WC Code
Class Title
Step A Step B Step C Step D
Range #
Step E Step F Step G
Payroll Group Class Code WC Code

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: STATUS UPDATE ON VACANCIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH
ASSEMBLY BILL 2561
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Human Resources
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council receive and file this report to comply with Assembly Bill 2561?
Recommendation:

Staff recommend that the City Council receive and file this report.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Nurture an organizational culture where employees are recognized for the delivery of high-quality services to the community.
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Ensure a strong financial outlook through careful planning, sustainable service levels, and fiscal sustainability.

BACKGROUND:

On September 22, 2024, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill (AB) 2561 into law to amend the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. AB 2561 added California Government Code

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 2 of 5
Section 3502.03 which requires public agencies to hold a public hearing at least once per fiscal year to report on vacancy and recruitment status and retention efforts. As a basis for the new requirements, the California Legislature determined that vacancies can be a significant problem in the public sector.

AB 2561 imposed three requirements on local agencies:

1. At least once each fiscal year, an agency’s governing board must hold a public hearing and receive the agency’s report on the status of vacancies and recruitment and retention efforts;

2. During the hearing, the agency must identify any necessary changes to policies, procedures, and recruitment activities that may lead to hiring obstacles; and

3. The agency must allow the recognized employee organization for a bargaining unit to make a presentation at the hearing if the vacancy rate in that unit exceeds 20%.

DISCUSSION:

There are five bargaining groups (three represented and two unrepresented) at the City of La Mesa consisting of 286 authorized full-time positions. Sixteen of those positions are vacant as of April 24, 2025, for an overall 5.9% vacancy rate. Below is a summary table showing the number of vacancies and percentage total vacancies by each bargaining groups. The Management employee group has the highest vacancy rate on a percentage basis at 11.6%.

Vacancy Rate Summary*
Employee Group
Number of
Positions
Number of
Vacancies
% of
Vacancies
Management - Unrepresented 43 5 11.6%
Confidential 3 0 0.0%
Heartland Firefighters of La
Mesa Local #4759 40 1 2.5%
La Mesa City Employees'
Association 95 7 7.4%
La Mesa Police Officers'
Association 89 3 3.4%
Total 270 16 5.9%
*as of April 24, 2025
Recruitment and Retention Efforts
Given the City’s lean organizational structure, the departure of key personnel can have an impact on operational efficiency and employee morale. To address these challenges,

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 3 of 5
an Employee Recruitment and Retention Committee was formed in 2023 to develop strategies that support workforce stability and organizational resilience. Significant outcomes from this Committee’s feedback include ratified enhancements across all employee Memoranda of Understanding and compensation plans, such as more competitive out-of-pocket healthcare costs (effective January 1, 2025) and the introduction of an employer match deferred compensation program up to $1,500 per calendar year (effective July 1, 2024). The Employee Recruitment and Retention Committee continues to meet regularly to discuss ongoing efforts and relay employee feedback to management.

There is a button called “Jobs” on the front page of the City’s website that links to online job postings. The City posts job announcements on the City’s website as well as www.GovernmentJobs.com to attract qualified applicants. The City also submits postings to industry-specific websites as appropriate. Additionally, the City of La Mesa accepts interest cards online that email candidates a notification each time a position opens with a category match to one of the categories an applicant has chosen.

Human Resources has moved beyond the traditional ‘post and pray’ approach for certain recruitments by leveraging applications such as LinkedIn’s algorithmic targeting to reach qualified candidates more strategically. By using data-driven recruitment tactics – including targeted ads to candidates based on industry, skillset, and location – the City of La Mesa has significantly expanded its outreach for hard-to-fill positions. For upper management positions, on occasion, the City will hire an outside recruiting firm which has proved successful with expanded outreach and augmenting staff resources.

Public safety roles, particularly Police Officers and Police Dispatchers, continue to be among the most challenging positions to fill both locally and nationwide. In response, the Police Department has implemented targeted incentives and employee referral programs to attract qualified candidates and improve recruitment outcomes. In addition, the Police Department adopted a policy allowing a temporary reduced work schedule for sworn officers, which increased the retention of experienced officers who were unable to work fulltime temporarily due to family/childcare challenges.

The Human Resources Director meets with the City Manager bi-weekly to prioritize upcoming recruitments and ensure the City meets its staffing needs. Human Resources Department completed the following recruitments and onboardings over the past two fiscal years, often a recruitment is conducted to fill multiple vacancies in the same classification.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 4 of 5
Employee Type FY 2024 FY 2025 (to date) *
New Hires - Part time 34 19
New Hires - Full time 27 43
Internal Promotions (includes reclassifications and
flex advancements) 15 9
Recruitments Conducted 29 28
*as of April 24, 2025
Retention Efforts:

The average tenure for City employees as of April 2025 is 8.9 years, demonstrating some stability within the workforce. To meet the changing needs of employees, the City has incorporated several retention strategies and is evaluating additional strategies for future development.

Employee engagement plays a critical role in retention, and the City recognizes its importance. Engaged employees who feel valued and supported tend to be motivated and passionate about their work and feel a strong connection to the organization. In addition to current efforts to support physical and mental wellbeing of employees, the City offers professional growth and development through tuition reimbursement, where employees are eligible to receive reimbursement for the cost of educational programs which are related to the employee’s occupational field, and citywide training opportunities for all staff. Upcoming training for managers and supervisors include topics on performance feedback, challenging conversations, and efforts on recognizing employee accomplishments - big and small. Employees are currently recognized formally through an employee recognition event.

There is an employee award program where employees are encouraged to nominate fellow employees in three separate categories. The award winners are announced at the annual employee recognition event and recognized at a City Council meeting.

The City is evaluating the creation of a comprehensive training and development program for employees to provide career advancement as well as implementation of another citywide anonymous employee engagement survey to gain insights on how best to support employees in delivering core services while ensuring a positive and engaged workforce.

Human Resources has established consistent data collection processes that will support future analysis and trend identification with the passage of AB 2561.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 5 of 5
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Gretchen Spaniol
City Manager Director of Human Resources
Attachments:

Vacancies by Bargaining Group and Summary Table

ATTACHMENT A
Department Division Current Job Class Title FTE Vacant/FillEmployee Group Vacancy Notes City Manager's Office City Manager EXEC ASST TO THE CITY MGR 1 Filled Confidential Human Resources Human Resources ADMIN.COORDINATOR-CONF 1 Filled Confidential Human Resources Human Resources HUMAN RESOURCE ANALYST 1 Filled Confidential Fire Fire - Heartland JPA FIRE BAT CHIEF 112 PMCERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE CAPTAIN - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER - PM CERT 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIRE ENGINEER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Filled Fire Suppression - 112 hr Fire Fire - Operations FIREFIGHTER-PARAMEDIC 1 Vacant Fire Suppression - 112 hr 1 City Manager's Office City Clerk DEPUTY CITY CLERK 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented City Manager's Office City Clerk RECORDS TECHNICIAN 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented City Manager's Office City Manager COMMUNITY CLEANUP COORD 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented City Manager's Office Information Technology INFO TECH ANALYST 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented City Manager's Office Information Technology INFO TECH SPEC II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented City Manager's Office Information Technology INFO TECH SPEC II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented City Manager's Office Information Technology INFO TECH SPEC II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Building ASSOCIATE ENGINEER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Building BUILDING INSPECTOR II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Building DEVELOPMENT SVCS TECH I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Building DEVELOPMENT SVCS TECH I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Building ENGINEERING TECH. II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Planning ADMN. COORDINATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Planning ASSISTANT PLANNER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Planning ASSOCIATE PLANNER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Planning ASSOCIATE PLANNER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Planning CODE COMPL. OFFICER II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Planning DEVELOPMENT SVCS TECH II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Services Aquatics RECREATION SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Services CS Administration ADMN. COORDINATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Services Facilities RECREATION SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Services Human Services CUSTODIAN 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Services Human Services RECREATION SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Finance Finance ACCOUNTANT II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Finance Finance ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Finance Finance ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Finance Finance ADMN. OFFICE ASSISTANT 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Finance Finance BUSINESS LICENSE OFFICER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Finance Finance CUST SERV SPECIALIST II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Finance Finance SENIOR ACCOUNTING TECH 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Fire Fire - Heartland JPA ADMN. OFFICE ASSISTANT 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Fire Fire - Heartland JPA EMER PREPAREDNESS COORD 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Fire Fire - Prevention FIRE INSPECTOR II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented

ATTACHMENT A
Department Division Current Job Class Title FTE Vacant/FillEmployee Group Vacancy Notes Police Police - Community Resources CRIME ANALYST 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Community Resources SAFETY VOLUNTEER COORD. 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Downtown Parking DOWNTOWN OPERATIONS ASST 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Services CLINICAL HMLS OUT SPECLST 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Services CLINICAL HMLS OUT SPECLST 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Services EXEC SECRETARY TO POL CHF 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Services HOMELESS OUTREACH TECH 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Services HOMELESS OUTREACH TECH 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Police Police - Services PROF STANDARDS UNIT ASST 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Briercrest Park Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Building Maintenance BLDG. MTCE. SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Building Maintenance BLDG. MTCE. WORKER II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Building Maintenance BLDG. MTCE. WORKER II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Building Maintenance CUSTODIAN 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Downtown Village Maint P W MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Engineering ENGINEERING TECH. I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Environmental Services ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Fleet Maintenance FLEET MAINT SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Fleet Maintenance LEAD MECHANIC 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Fleet Maintenance MECHANIC II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Fleet Maintenance MECHANIC II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Harry Griffen Park Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Harry Griffen Park Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER III 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Public Works Administration ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Public Works Administration ADMN. COORDINATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Street Maintenance EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Street Maintenance EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Street Maintenance HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Street Maintenance P W MTCE LEAD WORKER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Street Maintenance P W MTCE SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Street Maintenance P W MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Streetscapes Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Traffic Safety - Engineering ASSISTANT ENGINEER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Traffic Safety - Operations P W MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Tree Trimming SENIOR TREE TRIMMER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Engineering ADMN. OFFICE ASSISTANT 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Engineering ASSISTANT ENGINEER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Engineering ENGINEERING TECH. II 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Operations EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Operations EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Operations P W MTCE LEAD WORKER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Operations P W MTCE SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Operations WSTEWTR MTCE WRKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Operations WSTEWTR MTCE WRKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Wastewater - Operations WSTEWTR MTCE WRKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE LEAD WORKER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE LEAD WORKER 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE SUPERVISOR 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER I 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER III 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Public Works Parks Maintenance PARK MTCE WORKER III 1 Filled LMCEA - Represented Community Development Building CODE COMPL. OFFICER I 1 Vacant LMCEA - Represented 1 Reclassed from vacant Building
Inspector I Position
Community Services Classes-Events RECREATION SUPERVISOR 1 Vacant LMCEA - Represented 1 Fire Fire - Prevention FIRE INSPECTOR I 1 Vacant LMCEA - Represented 1 Police Police - Community Resources COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SPECIALIST 1 Vacant LMCEA - Represented 1 Public Works Downtown Village Maint P W MTCE WORKER I 1 Vacant LMCEA - Represented 1 Public Works Engineering PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 1 Vacant LMCEA - Represented 1 Will transfer to Community
Development 7/1/25
Public Works Wastewater - Operations EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1 Vacant LMCEA - Represented 1 Fire Fire - Heartland JPA DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 1 Filled Management - Fire Fire Fire - Heartland JPA FIRE CHIEF 1 Filled Management - Fire City Manager's Office City Clerk CITY CLERK 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety City Manager's Office City Manager ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety City Manager's Office City Manager ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MGR 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety City Manager's Office City Manager CITY ATTORNEY 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety City Manager's Office City Manager CITY MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety City Manager's Office City Manager COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety City Manager's Office Information Technology INFORMATION TECH MGR 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Community Development Building BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Community Development Planning ASST DIRECTOR OF COMM DEV 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Community Development Planning DIR OF COMM. DEVELOPMENT 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety

ATTACHMENT A
Department Division Current Job Class Title FTE Vacant/FillEmployee Group Vacancy Notes Community Development Planning MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Community Development Planning SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Community Services CS Administration DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Finance Finance DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Finance Finance FINANCE MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Finance Finance PURCHASING OFFICER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Fire Fire - Heartland JPA SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Human Resources Human Resources DIR OF HUMAN RESOURCES 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Human Resources Human Resources SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Human Resources Risk Management - Workers CompensRISK MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Police Police - Services POLICE SERVICES MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Environmental Services ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Public Works Administration ASST DIRECTOR OF PUB WKS 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Traffic Safety - Engineering ENGR PROJECT MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Wastewater - Engineering DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Wastewater - Engineering ENGR PROJECT MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Wastewater - Engineering ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Wastewater - Engineering MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Public Works Wastewater - Engineering SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Filled Management - Non-Safety Community Development Building BUILDING INSPECTOR SUPERVISOR 1 Vacant Management - Non-Safety 1 Community Services CS Administration SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Vacant Management - Non-Safety 1 Finance Finance DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 1 Vacant Management - Non-Safety 1 Police Police - Services MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1 Vacant Management - Non-Safety 1 Public Works Public Works Administration PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER 1 Vacant Management - Non-Safety 1 Police Police - Investigations POLICE CAPTAIN 1 Filled Management - Police Police Police - Investigations POLICE LIEUTENANT 1 Filled Management - Police Police Police - Patrol POLICE CAPTAIN 1 Filled Management - Police Police Police - Patrol POLICE LIEUTENANT 1 Filled Management - Police Police Police - Patrol POLICE LIEUTENANT 1 Filled Management - Police Police Police - Patrol POLICE LIEUTENANT 1 Filled Management - Police Police Police - Services POLICE CHIEF 1 Filled Management - Police Police Police - Community Resources POLICE SRVS SPECIALIST 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Investigations COMMUNITY SRVS OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE PROP OFFICER I 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE PROP OFFICER II 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Patrol COMMUNITY SRVS OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Patrol COMMUNITY SRVS OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Patrol COMMUNITY SRVS OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE SERVICES TECH. 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE SERVICES TECH. 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE SERVICES TECH. 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Traffic COMMUNITY SRVS OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn Police Police - Services POLICE DISPATCHER 1 Vacant Police Officers Association - Non-Sworn 1 Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Investigations POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn

ATTACHMENT A
Department Division Current Job Class Title FTE Vacant/FillEmployee Group Vacancy Notes Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Traffic POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Traffic POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Traffic POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Traffic POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Traffic POLICE OFFICER 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Traffic POLICE SERGEANT 1 Filled Police Officers Association - Sworn Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Vacant Police Officers Association - Sworn 1 Police Police - Patrol POLICE OFFICER 1 Vacant Police Officers Association - Sworn 1

Number of Positions Filled Number of Vacancies % of Vacancies 43 5 11.6%
3 0 0.0%
40 1 2.5%
95 7 7.4%
89 3 3.4%
270 16 5.9%
*as of April 24, 2025
FY 2023 FY 2024 (to date)
New Hires - Part time 20 16
New Hires - Full time 19 38
Internal Promotions (includes reclassifications and
flex advancements) 14 9
Total*
La Mesa Police Officers' Association
Employee Group
Management - Unrepresented
Confidential
Heartland Firefighters of La Mesa Local #4759
La Mesa City Employees' Association

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: TAX EQUITY AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF
1982 (“TEFRA”) HEARING FOR MT. HELIX ACADEMY
SCHOOL, 5901 -5999 SEVERIN DRIVE
DESCRIPTION: CONDUCT TEFRA HEARING AND ADOPT
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TAXEXEMPT AND/OR TAXABLE OBLIGATIONS BY THE

CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING,

REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COSTS

OF THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION,

IMPROVEMENT, REHABILITATION, EQUIPPING AND

FURNISHING OF VARIOUS EDUCATIONAL

FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE INSTITUTE

FOR EFFECTIVE EDUCATION, AND OTHER MATTERS

RELATING THERETO
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Finance Department
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt and/or taxable obligations by the California Enterprise Development Authority (the “Authority”) for the purpose of financing, refinancing and/or reimbursing the costs of the acquisition, construction, improvement, rehabilitation, equipping and furnishing of educational facilities for the benefit of The Institute for Effective Education (the “Corporation”), and other matters relating thereto.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 2 of 4
Recommendation:

That the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt the resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt and/or taxable obligations by the Authority for the purpose of financing, refinancing and/or reimbursing the costs of the acquisition, construction, improvement, rehabilitation, equipping and furnishing of educational facilities for the benefit of the Corporation, and other matters relating thereto.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to the City. The Authority will act as issuer and perform all the necessary legal and administrative responsibilities associated with the financing. The Obligations are special, limited obligations of the Authority payable solely through the repayment of the loans from the Authority, which repayment will be used to pay the principal of and interest on the Obligations. The Obligations issued by the Authority are not obligations of the City or any member of the Authority. Neither the faith or credit, nor the taxing power of the City, any member of the Authority, the State of California or any political subdivision is pledged to the repayment of the Obligations.

BACKGROUND:

Resolution No. 2014-046 authorized the execution of an Association Membership Agreement between the City and the Authority, and on June 19, 2014, the City joined the Authority as an Associate Member. The Authority has since contacted the City Clerk to request that the City hold a TEFRA hearing for a proposed tax-exempt financing project involving the Corporation (Attachment B). Specifically, the Authority is assisting the Corporation in financing the acquisition of property located at 5901–5999 Severin Drive, which is currently used in part by the Institute’s Mt. Helix Academy. As the financing will be conducted on a tax-exempt basis under the Internal Revenue Code, it requires a public hearing and approval by the local jurisdiction—in this case, the City of La Mesa.

Authority:

The Authority is a joint exercise of powers authority established by the California Association for Local Economic Development (“CALED”) whose purpose is to issue taxexempt and taxable conduit revenue obligations to fund commercial and industrial development projects within member jurisdictions. Federal and state laws provide the ability for cities and counties to join together under cooperative agreements to form joint powers authorities to issue tax-exempt and taxable obligations to fund projects that provide a public benefit and serve the needs of residents within the jurisdictions of the participating members. Cities and counties in California utilize joint powers authorities

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 3 of 4
primarily for economies of scale, to access specialized transaction knowledge and resources, and to avoid using valuable local staff time on these types of transactions.

There are more than 250 cities and counties that are associate members of the Authority.

The Authority’s activities are dedicated to providing economic development assistance to member jurisdictions as an extension of the economic development assistance provided by CALED to its members. The City became an associate member of the Authority on June 10, 2014. As an associate member of the Authority, the City is eligible to participate in the Authority’s programs.

Corporation:

The Corporation is a California nonprofit public benefit corporation and an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Corporation is an employer of over 150 teachers, therapists, assistants, and support personnel. The Corporation operates four schools, serving approximately 450 students: Cook’s Education Center, Children’s Workshop, Mission Valley Academy and Mt. Helix Academy located in the City of La Mesa.

The Corporation’s schools are accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC). WASC gave the highest level of accreditation to the Corporation’s schools. The Corporation’s schools are certified non-public, non-sectarian schools by the State Department of Education. This certification permits the Corporation to contract with public school districts to provide special education and certain related services to students with special needs. The Corporation’s schools provide general education and special education using evidence based teaching methods. The Corporation’s schools also offer speech and language, occupational therapy, counseling, and behavior intervention services for those students who require them. The Corporation’s schools accept private placements and students placed by their public school district.

Project:

The Authority proposes to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the costs of the acquisition, construction, improvement, rehabilitation, equipping and furnishing of educational facilities for the benefit of the Corporation, the address of which is 5901-5999 Severin Drive, La Mesa, California 91942 (as further described below, the “Facilities”), by issuing tax-exempt and/or taxable obligations for the benefit of the Corporation (the “Obligations”). The Facilities comprise the Corporation’s Mt. Helix Academy school. The Facilities consist of four buildings totaling approximately 57,911 square feet.

Interest on the Obligations will be exempt from federal and State taxes, which will reduce financing costs and debt service costs for the Corporation.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 4 of 4
In order for the interest on the Obligations to be tax-exempt, the Code requires the City to take the following actions:
1) Conduct a public hearing under the requirements of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”) comprising Section 147(f) of the Code; and
2) Adopt a resolution (attached to this Report as Attachment A, the “Resolution”) approving the issuance of tax-exempt and/or taxable obligations by the Authority for the benefit of Corporation.

The City Council is required to take these actions because the Facilities are located within the City, and the City Council is the elected legislative body of the City and the “applicable elected representative” under Section 147(f) of the Code.

The financing, refinancing and/or reimbursing of the Facilities with tax-exempt obligations will allow the Corporation to achieve significant debt service savings and deploy resources towards providing educational services to residents of the City and the surrounding communities in accordance with its mission.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt the resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt and/or taxable obligations by the Authority for the purpose of financing, refinancing and/or reimbursing the costs of the acquisition, construction, improvement, rehabilitation, equipping and furnishing of educational facilities for the benefit of the Corporation, and other matters relating thereto.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________
Greg Humora
City Manager
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Email from Authority request TEFRA heaing

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA APPROVING

THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $22,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY’S

REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING

AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION,

RENOVATION, IMPROVEMENT AND EQUIPPING EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE INSTITUTE FOR EFFECTIVE EDUCATION AND

OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED
WHEREAS, The Institute for Effective Education, a nonprofit public benefit corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the “Borrower”), has submitted, and the California Enterprise Development Authority (the “Authority”) has accepted, an application requesting the Authority to issue, from time to time, pursuant to a plan of finance, of one or more series of its tax-exempt bonds, notes, loan obligations or other evidence of indebtedness, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $22,000,000 (the “Obligations”) for the benefit of the Borrower pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State (commencing with Section 6500) (the “Act”); WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Obligations will be used for the purpose of (a) financing, refinancing, and/or reimbursing a portion of the cost of the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, remodeling, renovation and equipping of educational facilities located at 5901-5999 Severin Drive, La Mesa, California 91942, consisting of four buildings totaling approximately 57,911 square feet (collectively, the “Facilities”); and (b) paying costs of issuance and other related transaction costs in connection with the issuance of the Obligations;
WHEREAS, the issuance of the Obligations must be approved by the governmental unit on behalf of which the Obligations are issued and a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the territorial limits in which the Facilities is located pursuant to the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); WHEREAS, the Facilities are located within the territorial limits of City of La Mesa (the “City”) and the City Council of the City of La Mesa (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City;
WHEREAS, the Authority and the Borrower have requested that the City Council approve the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority for the financing, refinancing and/or reimbursing the cost of the Facilities with the proceeds of the Obligations pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code;
WHEREAS, the Facilities will provide significant benefits to the City’s residents through the educational services provided by the Borrower and the Facilities will also create and retain employment opportunities for the City’s residents;

WHEREAS, the Authority’s issuance of the Obligations will result in a more economical and efficient issuance process because of the Authority’s expertise in the issuance of conduit revenue obligations;
WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution shall comply with the public approval requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code; provided, however, that this Resolution is neither intended to nor shall it constitute an approval by the City Council of the Facilities for any other purpose; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Obligations and now desires to approve the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa as follows:

1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all of the recitals are true and correct.

2. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority, pursuant to a plan of finance, of one or more series, which Obligations may be tax-exempt and/or taxable as approved by the Authority in its Resolution, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $22,000,000 to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of the Facilities and to pay certain financing and other costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the Obligations. This Resolution shall constitute approval of the issuance of the Obligations within the meaning of Section 147(f) of the Code and shall constitute the approval of the issuance of the Obligations within the meaning of the Act. The City shall not bear any responsibility for the tax-exempt status of the Obligations, the repayment of the Obligations or any other matter related to the Obligations.

3. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing or refinancing for the Facilities; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the design, construction, renovation, remodeling, installation, equipping, furnishing or operation of the Facilities; (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority; or (iv) take any further action with respect to the Authority or its membership therein.

4. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the approval of the Obligations are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified, and the officers and employees of the City and their authorized deputies and agents are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all certificates and documents which they or special counsel may deem necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.

5. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of May 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

From: Michelle Stephens
To: Megan Wiegelman
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Setting up a TEFRA in La Mesa
Date: Friday, March 28, 2025 12:34:56 PM
Attachments: Outlook-gwn1zxrp.png
Outlook-vtjzynlk.png
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Megan,
I hope you're well. I am with the CA Enterprise Development Authority (CEDA), a JPA that issues tax-exempt financing. CEDA is working on a tax-exempt project with the Institute for Effective Education, in La Mesa. In order for the project to move forward, we need the city to hold a TEFRA hearing. Please let us know if you think the city can help with this.

I would also like to introduce you to our Bond Counsel Sam Balisy, ccd here. He can provide background on the project as well as resolutions and anything you may need to hold the TEFRA. He can also let you know what timing the school is looking for.

Sam, please use this email to connect with Megan and give her more detail on the project.

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions or need anything! M

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: May 13, 2025
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL
OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PC-2024-
14 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A GENERAL

PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE, SITE

DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP,
FOR A 73-UNIT TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT
(INCLUDING EIGHT (8) MODERATE INCOME
RESTRICTED UNITS) LOCATED AT 9407 JERICHO
ROAD (APN 486-670-18-00)
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the Council deny the Appeal regarding PC-2024-14? Recommendation:

That Council adopt the attached draft resolution denying the Appeal regarding PC2024-14 (Attachment A).

Fiscal Impact:

In 2004, the City adopted a 100% Cost Recovery Policy with exceptions. Appeals are an exception of said policy and are set at a fee of $100.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Maintain a community where residents and visitors feel safe.  Promote a high quality of life that current and future generations can afford to call home.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 2 of 11
BACKGROUND:

The 3.49-acre Project site is located at the junction of Jericho Road and Broadmoor Drive, and has frontage on the southwest side of Jericho Road, as can be seen on the vicinity map. The Project site is rectangular in shape and currently houses the Cavalry Chapel, associated church structures/facilities, a surface parking lot, turf area, ornamental plantings and a playground. Photos of the Project site are provided as Attachment B.

Existing right-of-way improvements along Jericho Road include sidewalk, curb, gutter, above-grade utility lines and two curb openings. The Project site is located just north of Amaya Drive, and less than one half mile west of the Amaya Trolley Station. Surrounding development includes single-family homes to the south and east, and multi-family developments to the north and west.

On May 23, 2023, the Council considered the Applicant’s (Meritage Homes) request to initiate a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the Project site from Urban Residential to Multiple Unit Residential and subsequently authorized the submittal of the application for the same. The May 23, 2023, Council Meeting minutes are provided as Attachment C.

On September 21, 2023, the Applicant, submitted an application for a General Plan Amendment which included a request for a Zone Change, Site Development Plan review, a Tentative Tract Map, Special Permit(s) and Design Review. Project plans are provided

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 3 of 11
as Attachment D. Additionally, the Applicant invoked the state density bonus law (Government Code Section 659155) seeking the relaxation of certain development standards in exchange for the provision of eight (8) moderate income restricted units.

The following is a summary of recommendations and actions related to the Project:

1. On October 14, 2024, the Design Review Board approved the site and architectural design in accordance with the Urban Design Program and procedures at a public meeting (Attachment E) (decisions of the DRB must be ratified by the City Council).

2. On November 12, 2024, the Applicant submitted a State Density Bonus Law Report pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code (LMMC) Chapter 24.053 (“Density Bonus Report”) (Attachment F). By providing 8 moderate income restricted units, the Project constitutes an affordable housing project pursuant to State Density Bonus Law.

3. On November 21, 2024, the Notice of Decision for the Site Development Plan posted for public review and was subsequently adopted on November 27, 2024 (Attachment G). The Site Development Plan review evaluates whether certain components of the Project are compliant with applicable standards and requirements and that no detriment to the public health, safety or welfare would result from the same.

4. On December 4, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Project. After taking public testimony and considering the record, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending the City Council adopt the MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Project (Attachment H).

5. On December 18, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project (brought back to the Planning Commission from an earlier meeting that failed to produce a quorum to conduct business). After public testimony and considering the record, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending the Council approve the General Plan, Zone Change, Site Development Plan, Special Permit(s), and Tract Map, subject to certain conditions of approval (Attachment I).

6. On January 14, 2025, the City Clerk received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s December 18th decision, Resolution PC-2024-14, recommending that Council approve a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Site

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 4 of 11
Development Plan, Special Permit(s), Tentative Tract Map, and Design Review for the Project (Attachment J).

7. On February 24, 2025, the Applicant modified the Density Bonus Report (Attachment K) to consolidate the previously requested special permit(s) for retaining wall height, fill limits and mechanical equipment within the setbacks, as well as requests for tandem parking and distance between buildings (waivers pursuant to State Density Bonus Law).

8. On March 7, 2025, a staff report for substantial conformance review of the Applicant’s request to modify the Site Development Plan pursuant to the Density Bonus Report posted to the City’s webpage for public review and comment (five calendar days). Public notice of the posting was mailed to parcels within 300 feet of the Project boundaries on February 27, 2025. One comment letter was received opposing the modifications. The Director of Community Development determined that the proposed changes substantially conformed with Notice of Decision NOD 2024-07 and no further action was necessary.

9. On March 27, 2025, the Applicant modified the Density Bonus Report to include additional waivers of development standards. On March 27, 2025, a staff report for substantial conformance review of the Applicant’s request to modify the Site Development Plan for the Density Bonus Report (Attachment L) was posted to the City’s webpage for public review and comment (five calendar days). Public notice of the posting was mailed to parcels within 300 feet of the Project boundaries on March 27, 2025. The Director of Community Development determined that the proposed changes substantially conformed with Notice of Decision NOD 2024-07 and no further action was necessary.

DISCUSSION:

Carlos E. Drago submitted the Appeal on January 14, 2025 on behalf of himself, and several other neighbors in the vicinity of Broadmoor Drive, Jericho, and Amaya Drive. Mr.

Drago and other neighbors attended and provided testimony during the Planning Commission public hearings.

The following reflects issues raised in the Appeal and corresponding staff responses.

Appellant Issue 1:

Planning Commission Resolution Item #2 states: “That development requirements are complied with, that design objectives are achieved, and that no detriment to the public health, safety or welfare will result.”

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 5 of 11
The appellant(s) asserts the following:

1. The traffic survey conducted was insufficient to accurately assess the impact of an estimated additional 150 vehicles on the neighborhood.

2. The survey results are compromised due to observed disconnections of the rubber hoses from the counting machine during the survey period.

3. The assessment was conducted over a holiday weekend, which likely resulted in skewed data.

Staff Response to Appellant Issue 1:

1. The traffic assessment letter (traffic study) conducted for the Project followed accepted best practices pursuant to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Guidelines for Transportation Impact Studies in the San Diego Region, May 2019 (Attachment M). This study complies with the City’s requirements for Traffic Assessment Letters. The data was collected on April 18, 2023, during AM and PM peak hours and was conducted by a trained Traffic Engineer. The data collected evaluated roadway segments for Jericho Road (Broadmoor Drive to Amay Drive), Amaya Drive (Water Street to Jericho Road) and Amaya Drive (Jericho Road to Kathy Street), and included calculations for average daily traffic (ADT) volumes.

The City of La Mesa’s roadway capacity standards, as outlined in Table 7-2 of the ITE Guidelines, only justify roadway segment improvements if traffic volumes result in Levels of Service (LOS) of E or F. LOS designations range between LOS A to LOS F, and provides a designation based on factors such as speed, travel time and safety.

The LOS designation calculated “without” the Project and “with” the Project is provided below.

Roadway Segment LOS (Without
Project)
LOS (With
Project)
Jericho Road Broadmoor to Amaya Drive A A
Amaya Drive Water Street to Jericho Road B B
Amaya Drive Jericho Road to Kathy Street D D
The results indicated that although there would be an increase in trips generated with the Project, all roadway segments are projected to continue operating at LOS D or better, and all intersections will operate at LOS B or better. Since the analysis shows that no roadway segments or intersections fall below the LOS E or F thresholds, the Project does not warrant additional roadway improvements.

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 6 of 11

2. Disconnected pneumatic tubes can occur due to factors like vehicle movements or vandalism, but this is promptly addressed by technicians to maintain data accuracy.

The reliability of the traffic counts is supported by the consistency between the two datasets: the April 18, 2023, count recorded 342 vehicles on Jericho Road (Broadmoor Drive to Amaya Drive), while the May 30, 2024 count recorded 347 vehicles on the same segment. The minimal difference of approximately 1% demonstrates the soundness of the data collection methods.

These findings reinforce the validity of the traffic assessment and confirm that the Project will not have a significant adverse effect on traffic operations in the area.

Therefore, the development requirements are complied with, the design objectives are achieved, and no detriment to the public health, safety or welfare will result in relation to the Traffic Assessment Letter.

3. The Appellant’s assertion that because the traffic assessment data collection was conducted over a holiday week, it likely resulted in skewed data is not supported by the study. The first set of traffic counts was conducted on April 18, 2023, and a second set of traffic counts was conducted on May 30, 2024. This additional count was not required but was performed to address public input. Although the count occurred during the week following the Memorial Day Holiday (May 27, 2024), it complied with regional standards, as traffic counts during holiday weeks are acceptable so long as they do not occur on the holiday itself.

Appellant Issue 2:

Planning Commission Resolution Item #3 states: “That the proposed land use designation amendment to the La Mesa General Plan land use map is appropriate for the site, is compatible with surrounding land uses, and is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Mesa General Plan. Adjacent properties to the north and west are designated Multiple Unit Residential and developed with multifamily residential units, the subject property is located within close proximity to a major collector street, and the subject property is within ½ mile walking distance to the Amaya Trolley Station.” The Appellant asserts the following:

1. The proposed location is unsuitable for a high-density complex due to its position and the inadequate access for the anticipated volume of vehicles on Amaya Drive.

2. The judgment and analysis underlying the decision appears to disregard the community fit.

3. The density of the Meritage project (aka Project) is incompatible with the Broadmoor Drive neighborhood, particularly affecting the resident at 9445 Jericho Road as, the

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 7 of 11
Appellant asserts, that the only feasible way for the resident to exit their driveway is by reversing onto Jericho Road, which poses significant safety concerns with the massive influx of additional vehicular traffic. Appellant further asserts that the same case can be said about the residents backing out of their driveway onto Broadmoor Drive.

Staff Response to Appellant Issue 2:

1. According to the General Plan, the Multiple Unit Residential designation is appropriate for properties with access to public transportation or generally located adjacent to streets which are shown as a major collector, arterial, or arterial parkway in the Circulation Element. The Project site (measured from the southeast property line) is approximately 120 feet from Amaya Drive, a major collector street, and is within ½ mile of the Amaya Trolley Station. The Project yields a density of 20.92 units per acre, which would align with the 23-unit per acre maximum density of the Multiple Unit Residential land use classification of the General Plan.

Further, comprehensive analyses conducted in the Traffic Assessment Letter and Technical Memorandum, prepared by licensed traffic engineers, indicate adequate access exists for the anticipated volume of vehicles and the Project will not adversely impact traffic operations or safety according to the metrics identified in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Guidelines for Transportation Impact Studies in the San Diego Region, May 2019. The traffic study finds that the Project will not degrade traffic operations to unacceptable levels.

The additional Technical Memorandum (Attachment N) completed for the Project identified opportunities for further improvement, including the recommendation to convert the intersection of Broadmoor Drive and Jericho Road to an all-way stop. The proposed all-way stop would address the following:
 Reduce potential left-turn conflicts.
 Improve visibility for road users at the intersection.  Enhance traffic flow at the intersection of two neighborhood collector streets with similar characteristics.

Overall, the studies completed demonstrate that the traffic regarding the Project poses no threat to general health, safety or welfare of the community.

2. The Planning Commission reviewed and considered all information and testimony and determined that the Project would not pose a threat to general health, safety or welfare and is proposed to be in context with adjacent multi-family residences as discussed above. The Project meets the land use element of the General Plan, which states that the general health, safety, and welfare of citizens should be ensured (Goal 1),

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 8 of 11
opportunities for infill development that is compatible and in context with surrounding land uses should be created (Goal 2), and equitable housing options should be provided (Goal 4).

Additionally, the Project would implement the goals and policies of the City’s Housing Element through the provision of additional housing options, and 8 moderate income affordable units, which would assist the City in meeting its state mandated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The Project provides an opportunity for for-sale homes and affordable housing, which supports the policies and programs for the City’s Housing Element.

The Project’s density complies with the development requirements of the R3 zone, and compliments the character of the surrounding community, which includes a variety of single-family and multi-family uses within close proximity (½ mile) to mass transit.

3. The technical analyses did not identify safety issues related to residents of surrounding neighborhoods exiting their driveways or from the Project site. The Technical Memorandum (Attachment N) addresses specific safety enhancements that include:
 To improve site distances along Jericho, vegetation and site obstructions will be removed as part of the Project
 Warning signs (W2-1) are proposed along the northbound approach on Jericho Road to alert drivers of driveways and potential turning or entering traffic.

Appellant Issue 3:

Planning Commission Resolution Finding #4 states: “That the proposed zone change of the subject property to the R3 zone is appropriate for the site, is compatible with surrounding land uses, and is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Mesa General Plan.”
The appellant asserts the following:

1. The Broadmoor Drive neighborhood is zoned R1 for a valid and significant reason, and that it is important to note that the majority of residents in the neighborhood oppose the zoning change.

2. The zoning should not be altered if the existing infrastructure cannot support it. The Appellant asserts that under R1 zoning, Meritage would not be eligible for bonus points, which currently allow for the circumvention of many established building regulations and that these regulations were meticulously developed by our predecessors to

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 9 of 11
enhance our society, ensuring it remains beautiful, functional, and protective of its citizens, not to mention the burden on public services.

Staff Response to Appellant Issue 3:

1. The R1 zone is designed as more urbanized areas of the City where streets and other public facilities are generally adequate to accommodate a dwelling unit density of seven dwelling units per net acre. Seven dwelling units per acre on the 3.49-acre Project site would allow for 24 new single-family lots. However, in light of State housing laws, which now authorize higher densities in single-family zones, singlefamily lots may contain up to four units (two primary and two accessory dwelling units by right).

In this case, if the Project were denied, a single-family residential project up to 96 units could be built without any public hearings on the Project site by right.

Additionally, pursuant to State Law (AB 2097), no parking would be required because the Project site is located within a half-mile radius of a major transit stop.

This means that within the existing R1 zoning, the Project site could be developed with up to 96 units with no parking (or guest parking) by right.

In consideration of other housing opportunities for the Project site, the Project is consistent with the surrounding muti-family zoning and designed in consideration of fit with the surrounding neighborhood. Adjacent properties to the north and west are designated Multiple Unit Residential and zoned R3, developed with multiple unit residential development, and consistent with the proposed land use and zoning. The proposed zone change would not result in the “singling out of” a small parcel of land for a use classification totally different from that of the surrounding area (also known as illegal “spot zoning”).

2. Analysis of the site conditions and the technical analyses for the Project do not support the Appellant’s assertion that the infrastructure would be unable to support the Project density. Studies provided by professional engineering consultants demonstrate that the surrounding sewer and storm drain infrastructure adequately supports the Project. Sewer infrastructure examined by the Sewer System Analysis prepared by Dexter Wilson Engineering (dated August 10, 2023) demonstrates that the flow increase will be adequately addressed by the existing sewer and is far below the City required threshold (Attachment O). Pursuant to the Project Drainage Study prepared by Hunsaker and Associates (dated July 28, 2023), storm water will be mitigated onsite via flow attenuation features and will decrease as compared to the existing condition prior to discharge to the underground storm drain system (Attachment P).

The zone change would not authorize the Project to circumvent any applicable building regulations. The intent of LMMC Chapter 24.05.025 authorizes increased

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 10 of 11
density as an incentive in exchange for specified project features and amenities.

Further, utility services are available to serve the new buildings, and the existing and proposed utilities are identified on the Project plans. Will-serve letters and comments from utility providers are included in the Project application (Attachment Q), demonstrating that the utility infrastructure in the area can support the Project.

CONCLUSION:

Based on the totality of the record, the Planning Commission at the December 18th, 2025, public hearing determined that Resolution PC-2024-14 supports the criteria and findings for approval and thereby recommended that the Council approve the Project.

Staff determined that the Appeal does not provide new information of a material nature warranting a denial of the Project or a change of findings as recommended by the Planning Commission.

The Appeal does not address issues regarding the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

PUBLIC NOTICE:

Notification of the May 13, 2025, City Council public hearing to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the Project was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the Project site and interested parties and published in the San Diego Daily Transcript on Friday, May 2, 2025.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached draft resolution (Attachment A) denying the Appeal (Attachment J).

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Lynnette Santos
City Manager Director of Community Development
Attachments:

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: May 13, 2025
Page: 11 of 11
A. Draft Council Resolution denying the Appeal regarding Resolution PC-2024-14 B. Site Photographs
C. May 23, 2023, City Council Meeting Minutes
D. Project Plans
E. Design Review Board Certification of Action (dated October 14, 2024) F. Density Bonus Report (dated November 12, 2024)
G. Notice of Decision NOD-2024-07
H. Resolution No. PC-2024-11
I. Resolution No. PC-2024-14
J. Appeal regarding PC-2024-14
K. Density Bonus Report (dated February 24, 2025)
L. Density Bonus Report (dated March 27, 2025)
M. Traffic Assessment Letter
N. Supplemental Traffic Technical Memorandum
O. Sewer Study
P. Drainage Report
Q. Will-Serve Letters and Utility Correspondence

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PC-2024-14

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT,

REZONING, A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, AUTHORIZING A 73 UNIT TOWNHOME PROJECT (INCLUDING 8
MODERATE INCOME RESTRICTED UNITS) LOCATED AT 9407 JERICHO ROAD (APN 486-670-18-00).

WHEREAS, on September 21, 2023, the Project Applicant, Meritage Homes, submitted an application for a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Development Plan, Tentative Tract Map, and Design Review (Project 2023-2348) to construct a 73-unit for-sale housing development at 9407 Jericho Road (APN 486-670-18-00) (“Project”);
WHEREAS, the Project provides for eight (8) moderate income restricted units (80% - 120% Area Median Income (AMI));
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and other applicable laws and regulations, the City prepared an Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Project;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 4, 2024 and accepted public testimony in considering Project 2023-2348; WHEREAS, on December 4, 2024, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Initial Study and adoption of the MND (Resolution No. PC 2024-11); WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 18, 2024, and accepted public testimony in considering Project 2023-2348; WHEREAS, on December 18, 2024, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC-2024-14 recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map related to the Project;
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2024, the City Clerk received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Resolution PC-2024-14 asserting that the traffic study conducted was insufficient, the proposed location is unsuitable for a high-density complex, and that the infrastructure would not support the zone change; WHEREAS, the traffic analysis conducted for the Project followed best practices pursuant to the Institute of Transportation Engineers Guidelines for Transportation Impact Studies in the San Diego Region (May 2019) and complies with the City’s requirements for Traffic Assessment Letters;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the General Plan, the Multiple Unit Residential land use designation is appropriate for properties with access to public transportation or generally located adjacent to streets which are shown as a major collector, arterial or arterial parkway in the

Resolution No. 2025-XX May 13, 2025

Circulation Element. The Project site (measured from the southeast property line) is approximately 120 feet from Amaya Drive, a major collector street; WHEREAS, analyses of the Project site conditions and the technical analyses for the Project, do not support the Appellant’s assertion that the infrastructure would be unable to support the Project density; and
WHEREAS, the Council conducted a public hearing on May 13, 2025, and accepted public testimony in considering the Appeal of Resolution PC-2024-14.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and accurate and hereby adopted in their entirety and incorporated in this Resolution.

2. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are supported by the record in its entirety related to this appeal including the staff report, public testimony, minutes, plans and exhibits, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.

3. The City Council thereby resolves to deny the Appeal pursuant to this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 13th day of May, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2025-XX, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

1 La Mesa City Council
Minutes of a Regular Meeting
Date:

Location:

May 23, 2023, 6:00 pm
City Council Chambers, 8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, California

Present: Mayor Arapostathis
Vice Mayor Parent
Councilmember Dillard
Councilmember Lothian
Councilmember Shu
Staff: City Manager Humora
City Attorney Sabine
City Clerk Wiegelman
Assistant City Manager Lee
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council minutes are prepared and ordered to correspond to the City Council Agenda. Agenda Items can be taken out of order during the meeting.

The Agenda Items were considered in the order presented.

Mayor Arapostathis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

1.1 INVOCATION - MAYOR ARAPOSTATHIS

1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
There were no comments.

3. COMMUNITY BULLETIN REPORTS
The Mayor, Council and staff made announcements and reported on various events taking place in the City. No action was taken.

2 4. ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1 PROCLAIMING JUNE 19, 2023 AS LA MESA JUNETEENTH AND

FRIENDS DAY
Councilmember Dillard read the proclamation proclaiming June 19, 2023 as La Mesa Juneteenth and Friends Day.

5.2 PROCLAIMING JUNE 2023 AS LGBTQ+ PRIDE MONTH
Mayor Araposathis read the proclamation proclaiming June 2023 as LGBTQ+ Pride Month.

Andrea Beth Damsky spoke in support of the proclamation.

Seth L. spoke in support of the proclamation.

Samantha Schwimmer submitted a comment in support of the proclamation.

Dave Palmer submitted a comment in support of the proclamation.

Heather D. submitted a comment in support of the proclamation.

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS – (TOTAL TIME – 15 MINUTES)
Mike Werner spoke regarding a San Miguel Fire & Rescue fire engine almost hitting him while he was walking in La Mesa.

7. CONFLICT DISCLOSURES
There were no conflict of interest disclosures.

8. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEW

8.1 INTERVIEW OF APPLICANTS FOR UNSCHEDULED VACANCIES ON

THE COMMUNITY POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
City Clerk Wiegelman explained that the three applicants were not able to attend the City Council meeting due to prior commitments. Luke Martin had provided a written statement expressing their interest in being considered for appointment to the Community Police Oversight Board as the Police Beat 3 representative. City Clerk Wiegelman said the appointments would be made at the June 13, 2023, City Council meeting.

3 9. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS

9.1 RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO FILL AN UNSCHEDULED

VACANCY ON THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
Mayor Arapostathis nominated Lauren Farace to the Youth Advisory Commission.

Resolution No. 2023-054
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Parent
Approve the appointment of Lauren Farace to the Youth Advisory Commission and adopt Resolution confirming the appointment.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Parent, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

9.2 RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO FILL THE

UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND

VETERANS COMMISSION
Mayor Arapostathis nominated Megan O'Dowd to the Community Relations and Veterans Commission.

Resolution No. 2023-055
Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Vice Mayor Parent
Approve the appointment of Megan O'Dowd to the Community Relations and Veterans Commission as the general population representative and adopt Resolution confirming the appointment.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Parent, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

10. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
Bonnie Baranoff spoke on Item 11.8.

Dawn Marie-Tol spoke on Item 11.8.

4 11. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 11.1 through 11.11)
Moved By Vice Mayor Parent
Seconded By Mayor Arapostathis
Approve Consent Calendar Items 11.1 through 11.11.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Parent, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

11.1 APPROVAL OF MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE TEXT OF

ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AT THIS MEETING
Approve.

11.2 RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE LA MESA-SPRING VALLEY

SCHOOL DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE COMMUNITY

SERVICES COMMISSION
Resolution No. 2023-056
Adopt Resolution.

11.3 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA MESA AND THE LA MESA
COMMUNITY WELFARE ASSOCIATION, INC.

Resolution No. 2023-057
Adopt Resolution.

11.4 CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FACADE AND

PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES
Approve.

11.5 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED
COMPENSATION PLANS FOR FY 2022-2023, FY 2023-2024, AND FY 2024-2025 TO UPDATE THE SALARIES FOR THE POSITIONS OF

DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF AND ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN -

CONFIDENTIAL
Resolution No. 2023-058

5 Adopt Resolution.

11.6 ERRATA RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2022-126 APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 22, 2022, FOR THE PURPOSE OF

INCLUDING ADDITIONAL RELEVANT FISCAL YEARS THAT WERE
INADVERTANTLY EXCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL RESOLUTION.

Resolution No. 2023-059
Adopt Resolution.

11.7 INDEPENDENT POLICE AUDITOR REPORT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING MARCH 31, 2023
Receive and file.

11.8 HOMELESS OUTREACH AND MOBILE ENGAGEMENT (HOME)
PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT (JANUARY 2023 - MARCH 2023)
Receive and file.

11.9 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION

TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD FOR A

STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN FOR THE INFLOW AND
INFILTRATION MITIGATION PROJECT PHASE 6 FOR A NOT-TOEXCEED AMOUNT OF $7,000,000 Resolution No. 2023-060
Adopt Resolution.

11.10 RESOLUTIONS TO INCREASE THE BUILDING DIVISION

PROFESSIONAL AND SPECIALIZED SERVICES ACCOUNT BY
$200,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 AND TO AMEND THE

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT BUILDING SERVICES WITH

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP
Adopt Resolutions.
a. RESOLUTION TO INCREASE THE BUDGET FOR BUILDING

DIVISION PROFESSIONAL AND SPECIALIZED SERVICES
ACCOUNT BY $200,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023, FOR A
TOTAL OF $783,200 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
Resolution No. 2023-061
Adopt Resolution.

6 b. RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE AGREEMENT WITH

INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP FOR PROFESSIONAL

CONSULTANT SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE BUILDING

DIVISION TO INCREASE THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT BY
$200,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023, FOR A TOTAL OF
$550,000
Resolution No. 2023-062
Adopt Resolution.

11.11 RESOLUTION TO INCREASE THE BUDGET FOR THE LA MESA

SUCCESSOR AGENCY AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAWSUIT

PROFESSIONAL AND SPECIALIZED SERVICES ACCOUNT BY
$30,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023, FOR A TOTAL OF $70,000

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
Resolution No. 2023-063
Adopt Resolution.

12. STAFF REPORT

12.1 CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE A GENERAL

PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
FOR 9407 JERICHO ROAD FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL TO

MULTIPLE UNIT RESIDENTIAL
Assistant Director of Community Development Hazlewood provided a PowerPoint presentation regarding the property at 9407 Jericho Road, highlighting the current land use designation, the proposed General Plan Amendment and zoning change, the process for General Plan Amendments, and the proposed project application.

Aaron Talarico, Vice President of Acquisitions and Entitlements, Meritage Homes, provided a PowerPoint presentation on Meritage Homes and MLC Holdings and the conceptual site plan for 9407 Jericho Road.

Council questions and comments ensued.

7 Moved By Mayor Arapostathis
Seconded By Councilmember Dillard
Authorize submittal of the application for a General Plan Amendment.

For (5): Mayor Arapostathis, Vice Mayor Parent, Councilmember Dillard, Councilmember Lothian, and Councilmember Shu
Approved (5 to 0)

13. COUNCIL INITIATED

13.1 CONSIDERATION OF DIRECTING STAFF TO AMEND THE POLICY

FOR THE DISPLAY OF FLAGS AT CITY FACILITIES TO ONLY ALLOW

THE DISPLAY OF GOVERNMENT FLAGS AT CITY HALL -

COUNCILMEMBER LOTHIAN
Councilmember Lothian explained the purpose for directing staff to amend the policy for the display of flags at City facilities to only allow the display of government flags at City Hall.

The following members of the public spoke in opposition to amending the policy:

Athena Mora
David Myers
Rebecca Littlejohn
Max Coston
Martin Campos
Brandon Duran
Raul Campillo
Amanda Webber
Rob Tol
Dawn-Marie Tol
Rev. Marcus Lohrmann
Janet Castanos
Janessa Goldbeck

8 Andy Trimlett
Mejgan Afshan
Lauren Cazares
Eunice Ventura
Rev. Cheri Metier
Fran Knori
Chevelle Newell-Tate on behalf of Assemblymember Akilah Weber Robert Hicks
Jen Lothspeich
Jen LaBarbera
Jessie Schmitte on behalf of Senator Steve Padilla
Chrissy Wood
Teri Andre
Isabella Clifford
Manuel Gomez
Vicki Sutherland
Ryn Corbeil
Melissa Weiss
Fabienne Perlov
Bonnie Baranoff
Craig Reed
Brianna Coston
Dr. Melissa James
Mick Rabin
Andrea Beth Damsky
Steve Yang
Mary Joe Wilson

9 Nadia Farjood
Sheira Stein
Evan Strawn
The following members of the public submitted comments in opposition to amending the policy:

Veronica S.

Samantha Schwimmer
Cindy Lopez
Felicia House
Dr. Hannah Miyamoto
Erin Mulligan
Emily Lynch
Christopher Glenn submitted a comment regarding the responsibility of the government to promote equality and justice and to take a stand on social issues.

Mary Davis spoke on flag neutrality and in support of amending the policy to only allow the display of government flags at City Hall.

Following Council questions and comments, no action was taken.

14. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (3 MINUTE LIMIT)
The Mayor and Council reported on various outside boards, commissions and committee meetings they attended. No action was taken.

15. AB 1234 REPORTS (GC 53232.3 (d))
There were no reports.

16. CITY ATTORNEY REMARKS
There were no remarks.

17. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Arapostathis adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m.
_________________________
City Clerk

#23024
11/07/2024
la mesa, CA

P-1
P-2
P-3
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
A-14
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-18
A-19
A-20
A-21
Project Information
Conceptual Site Plan
Conceptual Illustrative Plan
801A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - First Floor Plan
801A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Second Floor Plan
801A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Third Floor Plan
801A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Roof Plan
801A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Sections
801A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Spanish Elevations 801A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Spanish Enhanced Elevations 802A/803A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - First Floor Plan 802A/803A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Second Floor Plan 802A/803A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Third Floor Plan 802A/803A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Roof Plan
802A/803A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Sections
802A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Spanish Elevations 803A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Spanish Elevations 803A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Spanish Enhanced Elevations 901A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - First Floor Plan
901A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Second Floor Plan
901A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Third Floor Plan
901A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Roof Plan
901A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Sections
901A Building Composite (8 -Plex ) - Spanish Elevations Architect: Kevin L. Crook Architect
1360 Reynolds Ave. Suite 110
Irvine, CA 92614
Contact: Aric Coffee
Business: (949) 660-1587
www.klcarch.com
Civil Engineer: Hunsaker & Associates
9707 Waples Street
San Diego, CA 92121
Landscape Engineer: GMP
3176 Lionshead Ave. Suite 102
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Contact: Ryan Martin
Business: (858) 558-4500
www.hunsakersd.com
Contact: John Patterson
Business: (858) 558-8977
www.gmplandarch.com
Developer: MLC Holdings Inc.
5 Peters Canyon Road Suite 310
Irvine, CA 92606
Contact: Johanna Crooker
Business: (949) 299-3824
www.mlcholdings.net
A-22
A-23
A-24
A-25
A-26
A-27
A-28
A-29
A-30
A-31
Plan 2532.1 - Floor Plan
Plan 2532X.1 - Floor Plan
Plan 1633.1 - Floor Plan
Plan 1633X.1 - Floor Plan
Plan 1638.1 - Floor Plan
Plan 1638Y.1 - Floor Plan
Site Sections A-A
Site Sections B-B & C-C
Written Color Schemes
Color Boards - Spanish
SDP 1
SDP 2
SDP 3
SDP 4
SDP 5
SDP 6
SDP 7
SDP 8
SDP 9
SDP 10
SDP 11
L-1
L-2
L-3
L-4
L-5
L-6
L-8
Site Development Plan
Site Development Plan - Street Sections/ Site Details
Site Development Plan - Site Details/ Driveway Details
Site Development Plan - Existing Conditions
Site Development Plan - Grading Plan
Site Development Plan - Open Space
Site Development Plan - Accessible Route
Site Development Plan - Eave Setback Dimensions
Site Development Plan - Wall Sections
Site Development Plan - Wall Sections
Site Development Plan - Boundaries and Encumbrances
Landscape Concept Illustrative Plan
Landscape Concept Planting Plan
Landscape Concept Enlargements
Landscape Concept Enlargements
Landscape Concept Irrigation Plan
Landscape Concept Irrigation Details
Landscape Concept Fence & Wall Plan
Landscape Concept Lighting Plan
Landscape Concept Existing Trees
la mesa, CA
jericho road
L-7
L-9

A-1
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road 10/28/2024
P-1
Project Information
Property Owner
Calvary Chapel of El Cajon
9407 Jericho Road
La Mesa, CA 91942
Ph: 619.633.9956
Design Team
Applicant
MLC Holdings
5 Peters Canyon Rd, Suite 310
Irvine, CA 92606
Ph: 949.299.3824
Contact: Johanna Crooker
Architect
Kevin L Crook Architects, Inc.
1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110
Irvine, CA 92614
Ph: 949.660.1587
Contact: Aric Coffee
Civil Engineer
Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc.
9707 Waples Street
San Diego, CA 92121
Ph: 858.558.4500
Contact: Ryan Martin
Landscape Architect
GMP
3176 Lionshead Ave., Suite 102
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Ph: 858.558.8977
Contact: John Patterson
Legal Description
LOT 11, BLOCK 30 OF EL CAJON HEIGHTS, IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO LICENSED SURVEYOR’S MAP NO. 50 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 20, 1894. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY 110.00 FEET.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF LAND FIRST DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CITY OF LA MESA, RECORDED JANUARY 12, 1961, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 6087 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE NORTH 55°28’15” WEST ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF SAID LOT 11, A DISTANCE OF 3.75

FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ALSO THE NORTHWEST LINE OF PROPERTY DEEDED TO THE CITY OF LA MESA, RECORDED IN BOOK 7502, PAGE 21, DATED FEBRUARY 17, 1959; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEAST LINE SOUTH 37°41’43” WEST A DISTANCE OF 75.11 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF PROPERTY SO DEEDED, TO THE END OF A TANGENT 25.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE;

THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY (RECORD EASTERLY) THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 93°09’58” A DISTANCE OF 40.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 55°28’15” WEST A DISTANCE OF 147.96 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 50.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, HEREINAFTER CALLED POINT “A”, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY (RECORD NORTHERLY); THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 41°24’35” A DISTANCE OF 36.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF A REVERSE 50.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHEAST LINE OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE SOUTH 55°28’15” EAST ALONG SAID NORTHEAST LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 11 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT SAID POINT “A” THENCE SOUTH 55°28’15” EAST 2.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34°31’45” WEST 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°28’15” WEST 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°31’43” EAST 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55°28’15” EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 19, 1965 AS FILE NO. 150926 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE NORTHWEST 30.00 FEET OF LOT 11 IN BLOCK 30 OF EL CAJON HEIGHTS, IN THE

CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO LICENSE SURVEY MAP NO. 50, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 20, 1894, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF

THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEASTERLY 180.00 FEET OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 30 OF SAID EL CAJON HEIGHTS.

Proposed Development Standards
Gross Area: 3.49 Acres (152,024 SF)
Net Area: 3.49 Acres (152,024 SF)
* No deductions of the site area apply per “area of lot” definition found in LMMC 24.01.100 Total Dwelling Units: 73 Homes
Total Conditioned Square Footage: 115,215 SF
(excludes garages, porches, and decks)
Total Building Square Footage: 167,244 SF
(includes garages, porches, and decks)
Provided Parking: 151 Spaces Total
- Resident: 2 spaces per unit in a garage
- Guest: 5 spaces open on site
- Guest parking reduced per AB 2097
Property Setbacks:

Required per R1: Proposed per R3:
- Front: 15’/20’ - Front: 15’
- Side: 5’ - Side: 15’
- Rear: 15’ - Rear: 15’
Building Constrcution Information:
- Occupancy Type: R3 Townhome / U
- Sprinkler System: NFPA 13D
- Construction Type: R3
Project Description
Redevelopment of a 3.49-acre church site with up to 73 three story townhomes. Square footage ranging from approximately 1200 - 1800 square feet and 2 - 4 bedrooms. The site is located within one half-mile of a major transit stop and parking minimums do not apply; however, the project includes two garage spaces per unit plus approximately 5 guest spaces. The proposed project also includes the development of necessary private drives and utilities for the proposed development, as well as common open space amenities including a tot lot, barbecue area with seating and shade structure, turf lawn areas, bocce court, and seating areas.

Site Information
Address
9407 Jericho Road
La Mesa, CA 91942
Assesor Parcel Number
486-670-18-00
General Plan Designation
Existing: Urban Residential
Proposed: Multiple Unit Residential
Land Use
Existing: Institutional
Proposed: Multiple Unit Residential
Zoning Classification
Existing: R1
Proposed: R3
Density Bonus Points Analysis (338 points needed)
Total Site Area: 152,024 SF Units allowed per area/home in the R3 zone: 62 units - 17.76 du/ac (152,024/2,420 SF) Area per home: 2,082 SF (73 units - 20.92 du/ac) Max units allowed per points project earns: 80 units - 22.92 du/ac (152,024/1,895 SF) Bonus Category Point Value Maximum Points
Allowed
9407 Jericho
Road Points Explanation
Extra Recreation/Leisure
Open Space
21 points per each 1% of
extra open space
105 points for extra
common open space,
and 105 points for
extra private space
Extra Off-street Parking
21 points per each 1% of
extra number of spaces/
stalls
105 points 71.4
Required spaces = 146 (2 spaces per unit).

Provided spaces = 151. 151/146 = 103.4%.

3.4 x 21pts = 71.4 pts
Enclosed Parking
3 points per each 1%
of spaces completely
enclosed
240 points 140.1
151 spaces on site total (146 garage, 5
head in). 50% of spaces = 75.5. 146 - 75.5 =

70.5 spaces. 70.5/151 = 46.7%. 46.7 x 3pts
= 140.1 pts
Family Housing

10.5 points per each
1% of project units of
3+ bedrooms and 1,000
square feet each
315 points 315
73 homes. 10 - 2 bed, 32 - 3 bed, 31 - 4
bed. 63/73 = 86.3%. 86.3 x 10.5pts = 906.1
pts
Handicap Housing
210 points for following
C.A.C., Title 24 Handicap
Requirements
Total Points Earned 526.5*
*Max points allowed to be earned per 24.05.025 - Density Bonus is 525 points.

ROJECT
UNDARY

BROADMOOR
DR

AMAYA DR

LAKEVIEW DR

BROADMOOR PL

PROJECT

BOUNDARY
PVT. DRIVE "B"
PVT. DRIVE "E"
T
T
PVT. DRIVE "D"

JERICHO RD
PVT. DRIVE "C" PVT. DRIVE "C"
BLDG #2
BLDG #3
BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6
BLDG #7
BLDG #1
P=652.2
P=651.3
P=651.3 P=649.0
P=646.3
P=652.2 P=651.2
P=651.7
P=650.3
P=650.3 P=648.0 P=646.4
P=645.3
BLDG #9
P=652.6
BLDG #8
P=652.1
P=651.6
FF=653.3 FF=652.8
FF=652.3 P=652.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.9 FF=651.9
FF=652.4
FF=652.9
FF=652.0 FF=651.0
FF=647.0
FF=646.0
FF=652.0 FF=651.0 FF=649.7 FF=648.7 FF=647.1
FF=645.5
P=644.8
PVT. DRIVE "A"
10/24/2024
A-1
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road 10/28/2024
P-2
Conceptual Site Plan
Project Summary
Property Size1: 3.49 Acres
No. of Units: 73 Three-Story Townhomes2
• 10 - Plan 2532: 1210 SF, 2 bed., 2.5 baths, 2-car garage • 32 - Plan 1633: 1497 SF, 3 bed., 3 baths, 2-car garage • 31 - Plan 1638: 1781 SF, 4 bed., 4 baths, 2-car garage Density: 20.92 du/ac
Proposed Setbacks (per R3 zone):
• Front (To Jericho Road): 15’ to building
• Side (N and S Bndy): 15’ to building minimum
• Rear (W Bndy): 15’ to building minimum
Parking Required3:
• Resident: 2 Spaces per Unit (1 covered)
Parking Provided:
• Resident: Private 2-car garage per unit
• Guest Spaces4
: 5 spaces
Open Space Required:
• Total: 24,900 SF (341 SF per unit; 500 SF per du for units 1-10, 400 SF per du for units 11- 20, 300 SF pre du remaining) • Private Open Space minimum dimension of 6 feet
Open Space Provided:
• Total: 26,689 SF (365 SF per unit)
• Private Open Space5
(6’ min. dim., 72 SF min area): 11,489 SF
• Common Open Space: 15,200 SF
Notes:

1. Maintains existing knuckle geometry and location.

2. Type VB construction with NFPA 13D automatic sprinkler system.

3. Guest parking reduced per AB 2097.

4. Guest spaces are 9’ x 19’.

5. Private Open Space includes all areas within private patios or decks of a unit that meet the minimum area of 72 SF.

6. All proposed utilities shall be underground with easements provided.

7. Existing General Plan: Urban Residential

8. Existing Land Use: Institutional

9. Existing Zoning: R1; existing R1 zone setback requirements are Front: 15’/20’, Side: 5’, Rear: 15’

10. Proposed General Plan: Multiple Unit Residential

11. Proposed Zoning: R3

12. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 486-670-18-00

13. Site Address: 9407 Jericho Road, La Mesa, CA 91942
North
0 30 60
1” = 30’
#6
B
L
D
G
#
7 P
=646.3
P
=64

5.3 FF
=64

7.0 FF
=646.0
P
=64

4.8 FF
=64

5.5 A
MA
YA
D
R

PROJECT

BOUNDARY

JERICHO RD
DRIVE "C"
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
BLDG 801A
BLDG 801A
BLDG 801A
BLDG 801A
BLDG 803A BLDG 803A BLDG 802A
BLDG 803A
BLDG 901A
Additional Information found later in package including:
• Additional dimensions - SDP sheet 8
• Parking Details - SDP sheet 2
• Wall/fence details and materials - Conceptual Wall/Fence Plan sheet L-7 • Utility size, locaation, and elevations- SDP sheet 4. • Storm drain facilities - SDP sheet 4
• Existing easement information - SDP sheet 11
• Proposed easement information - SDP sheet 5
• Existing, proposed, and future street improvements - SDP sheets 4, 5, and 6 • Existing trees - SDP sheet 4, existing conditions sheet L-9

T
T
BLDG #2
BLDG #3
BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6
BLDG #7
BLDG #1
BLDG #9
BLDG #8

BENCH BENCH BENCH

JERICHO RD
X X
X
X

X X X X X
X
X X
X

X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X X X X
X
X

X X X X X X X
X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
9 OF
PREPARED BY: SHEET

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

JERICHO
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN 1

ILL BE USED TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT

PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SCREEN
MENTS AND PROVIDE PRIVACY. TREES HAVE BEEN
E AND TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE SITE. THE PLANT

SELECTED WERE DONE SO FOR THEIR LOW WATER

ON SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED USING A RAIN

E ADJUSTABLE SO AS NOT TO WASTE WATER
SPRAY.

DISTANCE
) - 20 FEET
S - 5 FEET (10' FOR SEWER)
UCTURES - 10 FEET
T
NG CURB LINES OF TWO STREETS) - 25 FEET
MULCH
ALL REQUIRED PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH TO A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES, EXCLUDING SLOPES REQUIRING REVEGATION AND AREAS PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHOUT VEGETATION SHALL ALSO BE MULCHED TO THIS MINIMUM DEPTH.

NOTE:

TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE TREES ARE PLACED WITHIN 10 FEET OF PUBLIC

IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING WALKS, CURBS, OR STREET PAVEMENTS OR WHERE NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE PLACED ADJACENT TO EXISTING TREES. THE ROOT BARRIER WILL NOT WRAP AROUND THE ROOT BALL.

IRRIGATION - AN AUTOMATIC, ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED AS

REQUIRED FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, DISEASE-RESISTANT CONDITION. THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT FOR THE VEGETATION SELECTED. ALL PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WILL USE AN APPROVED RAIN SENSOR SHUTOFF DEVICE. THE INTENDED IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE A DRIP SYSTEM.

ALL ON-SITE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROJECT HOA.

ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF LA MESA LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AND WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE; THE CORE SUB-AREA DESIGN MANUAL; AND ALL OTHER STATE STANDARDS.

ATER
PLETE

LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN

JERICHO
1 TREE PER EVERY 40 FEET OF STREET
FRONTAGE. STREET FRONTAGE 240 LF.
6 PROPOSED STREET TREES HAVE BEEN

PROVIDED
1642 SQFT OF HARDSCAPE AT PARKING AREA
169 SQFT OF LANDSCAPING PROVIDED FOR
ADJACENT PARKING. 10% (164SQFT REQ.)
OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:

REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 24,900 SF
- (10) UNITS X 500 SF = 5,000 SF - (10) UNITS X 400 SF = 4,000 SF - (53) UNITS X 300 SF = 15,900 SF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED:
11,489 SF
- (5) PLAN 2532 X 83 SF = 415 SF
- (5) PLAN 2532X X 166 SF = 830 SF
- (32) PLAN 1633 X 107 SF = 3,424 SF
- (31) PLAN 1637 X 220 SF = 6,820 SF
COMMON OPEN SPACE PROVIDED:
15,000 SF TOTAL
NOTES:

I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE

ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE

EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE

DESIGN PLAN

GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUB PLANTING TO BE

PROVIDED AT SLOPE AREAS TO HELP REDUCE
POTENTIAL EROSION OF SLOPES.

BARK MULCH TO BE USED IN PLANTING AREAS AND
NOT TO EXCEED 30% OF TOTAL PLANTING AREA.
10/24/2024
A-1
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road
North
0 30 60
1” = 30’
Amenity Area A
• + 1,400 SF
• Fire feature with seating
• Decorative screen wall
• See Amenity Plan for additional details
Amenity Area D
• + 5,100 SF
• BBQ area with shade sails and seating
• Tot lot and passive grass area for lawn games
• Enhanced with landscaping and special
paving at crosswalks
Amenity Area C
• + 2,800 SF
• Gathering space with water feature
• Decorative walkways and planting
• See Amenity Plan for additional details
Typical Three-Story Townhome Building
• 3 building types
• 1 elevation styles
• 3 floor plan variation
• Maximum height of 38.0 feet
• Oriented to provide front doors along
streetscapes and paseos
10/28/2024
P-3
Amenity Area B
• + 2,900 SF
• BBQ counter with overhead shade structure
• Variety of seating options
• Passive grass open space area
• Walkway connection to Amenity Area D
• See Amenity Plan for additional details
Amenity Area E
• + 1,800 SF
• DG Bocce Ball court
• Gather area with seating and umbrellas
Conceptual Illustrative Plan
BLDG 801A
BLDG 801A
BLDG 801A
BLDG 801A
BLDG 803A BLDG 803A BLDG 802A
BLDG 803A
BLDG 901A
Project Summary
Property Size1: 3.49 Acres
No. of Units: 73 Three-Story Townhomes2
• 10 - Plan 2532: 1210 SF, 2 bed., 2.5 baths, 2-car garage • 32 - Plan 1633: 1497 SF, 3 bed., 3 baths, 2-car garage • 31 - Plan 1638: 1781 SF, 4 bed., 4 baths, 2-car garage Density: 20.92 du/ac
Proposed Setbacks (per R3 zone):
• Front (To Jericho Road): 15’ to building
• Side (N and S Bndy): 15’ to building minimum
• Rear (W Bndy): 15’ to building minimum
Parking Required3:
• Resident: 2 Spaces per Unit (1 covered)
Parking Provided:
• Resident: Private 2-car garage per unit
• Guest Spaces4
: 5 spaces
Open Space Required:
• Total: 24,900 SF (341 SF per unit; 500 SF per du for units 1-10, 400 SF per du for units 11- 20, 300 SF pre du remaining) • Private Open Space minimum dimension of 6 feet
Open Space Provided:
• Total: 26,689 SF (365 SF per unit)
• Private Open Space5
(6’ min. dim., 72 SF min area): 11,489 SF
• Common Open Space: 15,200 SF
Notes:

1. Maintains existing knuckle geometry and location.

2. Type VB construction with NFPA 13D automatic sprinkler system.

3. Guest parking reduced per AB 2097.

4. Guest spaces are 9’ x 19’.

5. Private Open Space includes all areas within private patios or decks of a unit that meet the minimum area of 72 SF.

6. All proposed utilities shall be underground with easements provided.

7. Existing General Plan: Urban Residential

8. Existing Land Use: Institutional

9. Existing Zoning: R1; existing R1 zone setback requirements are Front: 15’/20’, Side: 5’, Rear: 15’

10. Proposed General Plan: Multiple Unit Residential

11. Proposed Zoning: R3

12. Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 486-670-18-00

13. Site Address: 9407 Jericho Road, La Mesa, CA 91942

11/07/2024
A-1
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-2
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-3
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-4
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

UNIT 2532.1R UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638X.1 UNIT 1633.1
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
0 2 4 8
11/07/2024
A-5
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-6
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-7
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-8
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-9
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-10
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-11
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

UNIT 1638X.1R UNIT 1633.2R UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638X.2 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638X.1R UNIT 1633.2R UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638X.1 JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
0 2 4 8
11/07/2024
A-12
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-13
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-14
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-15
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-16
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-17
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-18
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-19
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

UNIT 2532.1R UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633.1 UNIT 1638.1 UNIT 1633X.2 BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY
UNIT 1633.1
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
0 2 4 8
11/07/2024
A-20
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

11/07/2024
A-21
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

UNCONDITIONED SPACE

CONDITIONED SPACE

AREA TABULATION
UNIT 2532.1
11'-8" x 6'-0"
DECK
PWDR.

KITCHEN
12'-4" x 9'-6"
DINING
12'-10"x 13'-8"
GREAT RM.

COATS
83 SQ. FT.
20'-2" x 21'-1"
GARAGE
PORCH
ENTRY
11'-10"x 4'-0"

STORAGE

UTILITY CLOSET
27'-8"
25'-8"
12'-2" x 11'-9"
PRIM. BEDRM.
10'-3" x 10'-0"
BEDRM. 2
HALL
BATH 2
PRIM. BATH
W.I.C.
12'-0" L.F.

LINEN
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
0 2 4 8
11/07/2024
A-22
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

PWDR.

KITCHEN
12'-4" x 9'-6"
DINING
12'-10"x 13'-8"
GREAT RM.

COATS
11'-10"x 6'-3"
DECK
83 SQ. FT.
20'-2" x 21'-1"
GARAGE
PORCH
ENTRY
24'-8"
25'-8"
12'-2" x 11'-9"
PRIM. BEDRM.
10'-3" x 10'-0"
BEDRM. 2
HALL
BATH 2
PRIM. BATH
W.I.C.
12'-0" L.F.

LINEN
11'-10"x 6'-3"
DECK
83 SQ. FT.

UNCONDITIONED SPACE

CONDITIONED SPACE

AREA TABULATION
UNIT 2532X.1
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
0 2 4 8
11/07/2024
A-23
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

12'-5" x 7'-6"
DINING
15'-11"x 6'-0"
DECK

KITCHEN
BATH 3
15'-11"x 9'-11"
GREAT RM.
107 SQ. FT.

WORK/
STUDY
11'-5" x 10'-3"
BEDRM. 3
11'-5" x 40'-4"
GARAGE
ENTRY
PORCH
COATS
9'x40' CLEAR

STORAGE
5'-2" x 11'-2"
53'-6"
16'-6"
11'-5" x 10'-2"
BEDRM. 2
BATH 2
PRIM.

BATH
HALL
12'-4" x 14'-4"
PRIM. BEDRM.

LAU.
10'-10" L.F.

W.I.C.

WORK/
STUDY

UNCONDITIONED SPACE

CONDITIONED SPACE

AREA TABULATION
UNIT1633.1
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
0 2 4 8
11/07/2024
A-24
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

12'-5" x 7'-6"
DINING
15'-11"x 6'-0"
DECK

KITCHEN
11'-5" x 10'-3"
BEDRM. 3
BATH 3
15'-11"x 9'-11"
GREAT RM.
107 SQ. FT.
11'-5" x 40'-4"
GARAGE
ENTRY
PORCH
COATS
4'-6" x 10'-4"

STORAGE

STORAGE
5'-2" x 11'-2"
53'-6"
16'-6"
11'-5" x 10'-2"
BEDRM. 2
10'-10" L.F.

BATH 2
PRIM.

BATH
HALL
11'-4" x 14'-4"
PRIM. BEDRM.

LAU.

W.I.C.

JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE

THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
0 2 4 8
11/07/2024
A-25
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

15'-11"x10'-10"
GREAT RM.
15'-11"x 6'-3"
DECK
12'-4" x 7'-2"
DINING

KITCHEN
BATH 3
10'-0" x 10'-0"
BEDRM. 3
10'-2" x 10'-2"
OFFICE
20'-5" x 20'-2"
GARAGE
PORCH
ENTRY
BATH 4
10'-1" x 11'-2"
BEDRM. 4
51'-6"
21'-0"
LAU.

BATH 2
HALL
W.I.C.
15'-0" L.F.

PRIM. BATH
12'-0" x10'-10"
BEDRM. 2
15'-11"x 11'-8"
PRIM. BEDRM.

WORK/
STUDY

AREA TABULATION
UNIT 1638.1

UNCONDITIONED SPACE

CONDITIONED SPACE
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
0 2 4 8

THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR ADAPTABLE OPTION
110 SQ. FT 110 SQ. FT
11/07/2024
A-26
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

15'-11"x10'-10"
GREAT RM.
15'-11"x 6'-3"
DECK
12'-4" x 7'-2"
DINING

KITCHEN
BATH 3
10'-0" x 10'-0"
BEDRM. 3
10'-2" x 10'-2"
OFFICE
20'-5" x 20'-2"
GARAGE
PORCH
ENTRY
BATH 4
10'-1" x 11'-2"
BEDRM. 4
51'-6"
21'-0"
LAU.

BATH 2
HALL
W.I.C.
15'-0" L.F.

PRIM. BATH
12'-0" x10'-10"
BEDRM. 2
15'-11"x 11'-8"
PRIM. BEDRM.

WORK/
STUDY
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
0 2 4 8

THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
11/07/2024
A-27
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

±30'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±30'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
BLDG. #3 (801)
FF: 652.0
PAD: 651.3
BLDG. #8 (801)
FF: 653.3
PAD: 652.6
BLDG. #8 (801)
FF: 652.3
PAD: 651.6
BLDG. #3 (801)
FF: 651.0
PAD: 650.3
±29'-9"

TO AVERAGE POINT PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-9"

TO AVERAGE POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY
±30'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±30'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"
BLDG. #8 (801)

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
FF: 653.3
PAD: 652.6
BLDG. #8 (801)
FF: 652.3
PAD: 651.6
BLDG. #7 (901)
FF: 647.0
PAD: 646.3
±29'-9"

TO AVERAGE POINT PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO AVERAGE POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
0 4 8 16

KEY MAP
11/07/2024
A-28
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
BLDG. #1 (803)
FF: 652.9
PAD: 652.2
BLDG. #2 (801)
FF: 652.9
PAD: 652.2
BLDG. #3 (801)
FF: 652.0
PAD: 651.3
BLDG. #4 (803)
FF: 652.0
PAD: 651.3 ±29'-3" TO AVERAGE POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO AVERAGE POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO AVERAGE OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO AVERAGE OF PROPOSED GRADE
BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY BATH 4

KITCHEN
PRIM. BATH
ENTRY
±29'-3"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±30'-9"

TO LOWEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
BLDG. #6 (802)
FF: 647.1
PAD: 646.4
BLDG. #7 (901)
FF: 647.0
AD: 646.3
BLDG. #7 (901)
FF: 646.0
PAD: 645.3
BLDG. #7 (901)
FF: 645.5
PAD: 644.8
±29'-3"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-3"

TO AVERAGE POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±28'-9"

TO HIGHEST POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
±29'-9"

TO AVERAGE POINT OF PROPOSED GRADE
JOB #: 23024
Kevin L. Crook
Inc
klcarch.com
Architect
PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE
0 4 8 16

KEY MAP
11/07/2024
A-29
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

WRITTEN COLOR SCHEMES
PROJECT 23024
CREATED 7/7/2023
Client Revisions 8/20/2024
SPANISH SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2
STUCCO 1 1503 1572
STUCCO PAINT MATCH*** SW 7028 INCREDIBLE WHITE RGB 255/255/255 STUCCO 2
(WAINSCOT / 1ST FLOOR

STUCCO ENTRIES)
SW9084

COCOA WHIP
SW9169
CHATURA GRAY STUCCO: OMEGA

FASCIA / TRIM /

GARAGE DOOR
SW6083
SABLE
SW6075
GARRET GRAY PAINT:

SHERWIN

WILLIAMS

FRONT DOORS /

SHUTTERS
SW2839

RYCRFT COPPER RED
SW0032

NEEDLEPOINT NAVY

CONCRETE
ROOF:

EAGLE /

WESTLAKE

CLAY PIPES
SW6061

TANBARK
SW6061
TANBARK GUTTERS: RGS

WROUGHT IRON
SW7675

SEALSKIN
SW7675

SEALSKIN

DECORATIVE
TILES:

TIERRA Y
FUEGO
EAGLE ROOF: LOW
PROF. "S" MALIBU
2636

PIEDMONT BLEND
2606
VALLEJO RANGE CERAMIC TILE: DALTILE
BORAL ROOF: LOW
PROF. "S" VILLA
1VICS3182

GARNET BLEND
1VICS6464

CA MISSION BLEND
DECORATIVE TILE:
6" x 6"

SANTA BARBARA
ITEM #30984

SANTA BARBARA
ITEM #30798

CERAMIC SOLID TILE
6" x 6"

KEYSTONES
FIRE BRICK Q093

KEYSTONES
SEA BREEZE Q174

CERAMIC SOLID TILE
6" x 6"

KEYSTONES
BLACK K111

KEYSTONES
BLACK K111
GUTTERS: RUSTIC BROWN RUSTIC BROWN
ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. *** For photoshop renderings only, do NOT use in the field

JERICHO ROAD

LA MESA, CA
11/07/2024
A-30
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

JERICHO ROAD
LA MESA, CA AUG. 20, 2024
#23024

SPANISH
SCHEME #1 WALL
SEMI-GLOSS™ & MATTE™

GLAZED CERAMIC
(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) indicate price groups, (1) being the least expensive.

SEMI-GLOSS WALL TILE
ALMOND
0135 (1)

ARCTIC WHITE
0190 (1)
ALMOND
K165 (2)
WHITE
0100 (1)

URBAN PUTTY
0161 (1)
WHITE
K101 (2)

ARCHITECTURAL
GRAY 0109 (2)
GOLDEN
GRANITE 0138 (1)

UPTOWN TAUPE
0132 (2)

PEPPER WHITE
0147 (1)

ELEMENTAL TAN
0166 (1)

ARTISAN BROWN
0144 (2) ◆

BISCUIT
K175 (2)

CRISP LINEN
0139 (1)

KEY LIME
Q098 (4) ✚

ICE GREY
K176 (2)

DESERT GRAY
X114 (1)

SUEDE GRAY
0182 (2)

PLUM CRAZY
Q178 (4) ✚

CORAL BEAD
Q092 (4) ✚

ORANGE BURST
Q097 (4) ✚

FIRE BRICK
Q093 (4) ✚

CHAMPAGNE
TOAST Q150 (4) ✚

CITRIC BLOOM
Q140 (4) ✚

GO GREEN
Q170 (4) ✚

CHALK BOARD
Q180 (4) ✚
SPA
0148 (1)

AQUA GLOW
0197 (2) ◆
AEGEAN
Q192 (4) ✚

SEA BREEZE
Q174 (4) ✚

ELECTRIC BLUE
Q194 (4) ✚

OCEAN BLUE
Q049 (4) ✚
BLACK
K111 (2)

GARDEN SPOT
0141 (2) ◆

WOOD VIOLET
Q467 (4) ✚

MOON BEAM
Q091 (4) ✚

CORNSILK
0160 (1)

LUMINARY GOLD
0142 (2)

SUNFLOWER
DH50 (3) ◆

MUSTARD
Q012 (4) ✚

TOTALLY TANGERINE
Q151 (4) ✚

CARNATION
PINK Q095 (4) ✚

PUMPKIN SPICE
Q090 (4) ✚
NAVY
K189 (2) ★ ◆

WATERFALL
0169 (1)
COBALT
DM14 (3) ★ ◆
GALAXY
1469 (1) ◆

CHIANTI
Q094 (4) ✚

VERMILLION
0DM1 (5) ★
(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) indicate price groups, (1) being the least expensive. ✚ “Q” colors are special order. Please allow 1-2 weeks lead time from the date of order. ★ Subject to crazing; black grout not recommended.
◆ Made to order and requires 6-8 weeks delivery from date of order.

See the Rittenhouse Square™ Collection for colors available in 3 x 6 sizes.

See the Modern Dimensions™ Collection for colors available in 4-1/4 x 8-1/2 and 4-1/4 x 12-3/4 sizes.

ALMOND
0135 (1)

ARCTIC WHITE
0190 (1)
ALMOND
K165 (2)
WHITE
0100 (1)

URBAN PUTTY
0161 (1)
WHITE
K101 (2)

ARCHITECTURAL
GRAY 0109 (2)
GOLDEN
GRANITE 0138 (1)

UPTOWN TAUPE
0132 (2)

PEPPER WHITE
0147 (1)

ELEMENTAL TAN
0166 (1)

ARTISAN BROWN
0144 (2) ◆

BISCUIT
K175 (2)

CRISP LINEN
0139 (1)

KEY LIME
Q098 (4) ✚

ICE GREY
K176 (2)

DESERT GRAY
X114 (1)

SUEDE GRAY
0182 (2)

PLUM CRAZY
Q178 (4) ✚

CORAL BEAD
Q092 (4) ✚

ORANGE BURST
Q097 (4) ✚

FIRE BRICK
Q093 (4) ✚

CHAMPAGNE
TOAST Q150 (4) ✚

CITRIC BLOOM
Q140 (4) ✚

GO GREEN
Q170 (4) ✚

CHALK BOARD
Q180 (4) ✚
SPA
0148 (1)

AQUA GLOW
0197 (2) ◆
AEGEAN
Q192 (4) ✚

SEA BREEZE
Q174 (4) ✚

ELECTRIC BLUE
Q194 (4) ✚

OCEAN BLUE
Q049 (4) ✚
BLACK
K111 (2)

GARDEN SPOT
0141 (2) ◆

WOOD VIOLET
Q467 (4) ✚

MOON BEAM
Q091 (4) ✚

CORNSILK
0160 (1)

LUMINARY GOLD
0142 (2)

SUNFLOWER
DH50 (3) ◆

MUSTARD
Q012 (4) ✚

TOTALLY TANGERINE
Q151 (4) ✚

CARNATION
PINK Q095 (4) ✚

PUMPKIN SPICE
Q090 (4) ✚
NAVY
K189 (2) ★ ◆

WATERFALL
0169 (1)
COBALT
DM14 (3) ★ ◆
GALAXY
1469 (1) ◆

CHIANTI
Q094 (4) ✚

VERMILLION
0DM1 (5) ★

FRONT DOORS /

SHUTTERS

FASCIA / TRIM /

GARAGE DOOR

CLAY PIPES

STUCCO BODY
ROOF
STUCCO 2

WROUGHT IRON

DECORATIVE & SOLID CERAMIC TILE

OR SIMILAR

JERICHO ROAD
LA MESA, CA AUG. 20, 2024
#23024

SPANISH
SCHEME #2
(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) indicate price groups, (1) being the least expensive. ✚ “Q” colors are special order. Please allow 1-2 weeks lead time from the date of order. ★ Subject to crazing; black grout not recommended.
◆ Made to order and requires 6-8 weeks delivery from date of order.

See the Rittenhouse Square™ Collection for colors available in 3 x 6 sizes.

See the Modern Dimensions™ Collection for colors available in 4-1/4 x 8-1/2 and 4-1/4 x 12-3/4 sizes.

SEMI-GLOSS WALL TILE

ARCTIC WHITE
0190 (1)
ALMOND
K165 (2)
WHITE
0100 (1)

URBAN PUTTY
0161 (1)
WHITE
K101 (2)

ARCHITECTURAL
GRAY 0109 (2)
GOLDEN
GRANITE 0138 (1)

UPTOWN TAUPE
0132 (2)

PEPPER WHITE
0147 (1)

ELEMENTAL TAN
0166 (1)

ARTISAN B
0144 (2) ◆

BISCUIT
K175 (2)

KEY LIME
Q098 (4) ✚

ICE GREY
K176 (2)

DESERT GRAY
X114 (1)

SUEDE GRAY
0182 (2)

PLUM CRAZY
Q178 (4) ✚

CORAL BEAD
Q092 (4) ✚

ORANGE BURST
Q097 (4) ✚

CITRIC BLOOM
Q140 (4) ✚

GO GREEN
Q170 (4) ✚

CHALK BO
Q180 (4) ✚
SPA
0148 (1)
AEGEAN
Q192 (4) ✚

SEA BREEZE
Q174 (4) ✚

ELECTRIC BLUE
Q194 (4) ✚

OCEAN BLUE
Q049 (4) ✚

GARDEN SPOT
0141 (2) ◆

WOOD VIOLET
Q467 (4) ✚

MOON BEAM
Q091 (4) ✚

CORNSILK
0160 (1)

LUMINARY GOLD
0142 (2)

SUNFLOWER
DH50 (3) ◆

MUSTARD
Q012 (4) ✚

TOTALLY TANGERINE
Q151 (4) ✚

CARNATION
PINK Q095 (4) ✚

PUMPKIN S
Q090 (4) ✚

WATERFALL
0169 (1)
COBALT
DM14 (3) ★ ◆
GALAXY
1469 (1) ◆

CHIANTI
Q094 (4) ✚

VERMILLION
0DM1 (5) ★
(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) indicate price groups, (1) being the least expensive. ✚ “Q” colors are special order. Please allow 1-2 weeks lead time from the date of order. ★ Subject to crazing; black grout not recommended.
◆ Made to order and requires 6-8 weeks delivery from date of order.

See the Rittenhouse Square™ Collection for colors available in 3 x 6 sizes.

See the Modern Dimensions™ Collection for colors available in 4-1/4 x 8-1/2 and 4-1/4 x 12-3/4 sizes.

ALMOND
0135 (1)

ARCTIC WHITE
0190 (1)
ALMOND
K165 (2)
WHITE
0100 (1)

URBAN PUTTY
0161 (1)
WHITE
K101 (2)

ARCHITECTURAL
GRAY 0109 (2)
GOLDEN
GRANITE 0138 (1)

UPTOWN TAUPE
0132 (2)

PEPPER WHITE
0147 (1)

ELEMENTAL TAN
0166 (1)

ARTISAN BROWN
0144 (2) ◆

BISCUIT
K175 (2)

CRISP LINEN
0139 (1)

KEY LIME
Q098 (4) ✚

ICE GREY
K176 (2)

DESERT GRAY
X114 (1)

SUEDE GRAY
0182 (2)

PLUM CRAZY
Q178 (4) ✚

CORAL BEAD
Q092 (4) ✚

ORANGE BURST
Q097 (4) ✚

FIRE BRICK
Q093 (4) ✚

CHAMPAGNE
TOAST Q150 (4) ✚

CITRIC BLOOM
Q140 (4) ✚

GO GREEN
Q170 (4) ✚

CHALK BOARD
Q180 (4) ✚
SPA
0148 (1)

AQUA GLOW
0197 (2) ◆
AEGEAN
Q192 (4) ✚

SEA BREEZE
Q174 (4) ✚

ELECTRIC BLUE
Q194 (4) ✚

OCEAN BLUE
Q049 (4) ✚
BLACK
K111 (2)

GARDEN SPOT
0141 (2) ◆

WOOD VIOLET
Q467 (4) ✚

MOON BEAM
Q091 (4) ✚

CORNSILK
0160 (1)

LUMINARY GOLD
0142 (2)

SUNFLOWER
DH50 (3) ◆

MUSTARD
Q012 (4) ✚

TOTALLY TANGERINE
Q151 (4) ✚

CARNATION
PINK Q095 (4) ✚

PUMPKIN SPICE
Q090 (4) ✚
NAVY
K189 (2) ★ ◆

WATERFALL
0169 (1)
COBALT
DM14 (3) ★ ◆
GALAXY
1469 (1) ◆

CHIANTI
Q094 (4) ✚

VERMILLION
0DM1 (5) ★

STUCCO BODY
ROOF
STUCCO 2

FRONT DOORS /

SHUTTERS

FASCIA / TRIM /

GARAGE DOOR

CLAY PIPES

WROUGHT IRON

DECORATIVE & SOLID CERAMIC TILE

OR SIMILAR
*COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER CALIBRATION. COLOR BOARDS - SPANISH REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIALS BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS. 11/07/2024
A-31
#23024
la mesa, CA
jericho road

PROPOSED PORTION OF PVT. DRIVE 'E'
(AT CURB RETURN NORTH OF PROP. STORM DRAIN CONN.)

EXISTING BROADMOR DRIVE

EXISTING JERICHO ROAD
PROPOSED PVT. DRIVES 'B' & 'D'
PROPOSED PVT. DRIVE 'A'
PROPOSED PORTION OF PVT. DRIVE 'C'
PROPOSED PORTION OF PVT. DRIVE 'E'
(WHERE ON STREET PARKING IS SHOWN)

EXISTING AMAYA DRIVE
11 OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
JERICHO ROAD RMB24061
2 TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL
0" MOD. CURB
4" MOD. 'G-2' CURB & GUTTER
4" MOD. 'G-4' ROLLED CURB
4" MOD. 'G-1' CURB

STREET SECTIONS / SITE DETAILS

DRIVEWAY/GARAGE DETAIL ON CROWNED DRIVE
TYPICAL 8-PLEX & 8-PLEX WITH TURN-IN

DETAIL ON CROWNED DRIVE
TYPICAL 9-PLEX WITH TURN-IN DRIVEWAY/GARAGE

DRIVEWAY/GARAGE DETAIL ON INVERTED DRIVE
TYPICAL 8-PLEX & 8-PLEX WITH TURN-IN
11 OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
JERICHO ROAD RMB24061
3 SITE DETAILS / DRIVEWAY DETAILS

APPLICABLE TO ALL BUILDING TYPES

TYPICAL BUILDING

DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL

LAKEVIEW DR
A
MA
YA
D
R

PROJECT

BOUNDARY

PROJECT

BOUNDARY

BROADMOOR PL

JERICHO RD
B
R
OA
D
M
O
O
R
D
R
11 OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
JERICHO ROAD RMB24061

EXISTING CONDITIONS
4

PROJECT

BOUNDARY
B
R
OA
D
M
O
O
R
D
R
A
MA
YA
D
R

LAKEVIEW DR

BROADMOOR PL

PROJECT

BOUNDARY
PVT. DRIVE "B"
P
VT. D
R
I
VE
"
E
"
T
T
M
M
M
M
M
PVT. DRIVE "D"

JERICHO RD
BF
BF
BF
BF
BF
PVT PVT. DRIVE "C"
. DRIVE "C"
BLDG #2
BLDG #3
BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6
B
L
D
G
#
7 BLDG #1
P=652.2
P=651.3
P=651.3 P=649.0
P
=646.3
P=652.2 P=651.2
P=651.7
P=650.3
P=650.3
P=648.0 P=646.4
P
=64

5.3 BLDG #9
P=652.6
BLDG #8
P=652.1
P=651.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.8
FF=652.3 P=652.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.9
FF=651.9
FF=652.4
FF=652.9
FF=652.0 FF=651.0
FF=64

7.0 FF=646.0
FF=652.0 FF=651.0 FF=649.7
FF=648.7
FF=647.1
P
=64

4.8 FF=64

5.5 PVT. DRIVE "A"

EASEMENTS

PROPOSED
11 OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
JERICHO ROAD RMB24061
5 GRADING PLAN

PROJECT

BOUNDARY
B
R
OA
D
M
O
O
R
D
R
A
MA
YA
D
R

LAKEVIEW DR

BROADMOOR PL

PROJECT

BOUNDARY
PVT. DRIVE "B"
P
VT. D
R
I
VE
"
E
"
T
T
PVT. DRIVE "D"

JERICHO RD
PVT PVT. DRIVE "C"
. DRIVE "C"
BLDG #2
BLDG #3
BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6
B
L
D
G
#
7 BLDG #1
P=652.2
P=651.3
P=651.3 P=649.0
P
=646.3
P=652.2 P=651.2
P=651.7
P=650.3
P=650.3
P=648.0 P=646.4
P
=64

5.3 BLDG #9
P=652.6
BLDG #8
P=652.1
P=651.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.8
FF=652.3 P=652.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.9
FF=651.9
FF=652.4
FF=652.9
FF=652.0 FF=651.0
FF=64

7.0 FF=646.0
FF=652.0 FF=651.0 FF=649.7
FF=648.7
FF=647.1
P
=64

4.8 FF=64

5.5 PVT. DRIVE "A"
11 OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
JERICHO ROAD RMB24061
7 ACCESSIBILE ROUTE
LEGEND

PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE

PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE UNIT

A
MA
YA
D
R

PROJECT

BOUNDARY

JERICHO RD
PVT. DRIVE "A"
PVT. DRIVE "B"
P
VT. D
R
I
VE
"
E
"
PVT. DRIVE "D"
PVT. DRIVE "C" PVT. DRIVE "C"
BLDG #2
BLDG #3
BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6
B
L
D
G
#
7 BLDG #1
P=652.2
P=651.3
P=651.3 P=649.0
P
=
6 4

6.3 P=652.2
P=651.2
P=651.7
P=650.3
P=650.3
P=648.0 P=646.4
P
=
6 4

5.3 BLDG #9
P=652.6
BLDG #8
P=652.1
P=651.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.8
FF=652.3 P=652.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.9
FF=651.9
FF=652.4
FF=652.9
FF=652.0 FF=651.0
FF=
6 4

7.0 FF=
6 4

6.0 FF=652.0 FF=651.0 FF=649.7
FF=648.7
FF=647.1
P
=
6 4

4.8 FF=
6 4

5.5 11
OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
JERICHO ROAD RMB24061
8 EAVE SETBACK DIMENSIONS
LEGEND
NOTE:

11 OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

JERICHO ROAD
RMB24061
JERICHO ROAD RMB24061
11 BOUNDARIES AND ENCUMBRANCES
’
’
’
’ ”
’
’
’
’
’ ’
’ ’

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

TITLE REFERENCE

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

TITLE EXCEPTIONS
—

T T BLDG #2 BLDG #3 BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6
BLDG #7 BLDG #1 BLDG #9 BLDG #8
BENCH BENCH BENCH JERICHO RD X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9OF PREPARED BY: SHEET CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA JERICHO LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN 1 DESIGN INTENT STATEMENT THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN INTENT OF THIS PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE PLANT MATERIAL THAT ACCENTS AND FRAMES THE ARCHITECTURE AND ENHANCES THE PEDESTRIAN SCALE OF THE PROJECT. STREET TREES ARE CONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDING AREAS AND WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE ADJACENT COMMUNITY. PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SCREEN AND BUFFER UNSIGHTLY ELEMENTS AND PROVIDE PRIVACY. TREES HAVE BEEN PLACED TO BEAUTIFY THE SITE AND TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE SITE. THE PLANT MATERIALS THAT HAVE BEEN SELECTED WERE DONE SO FOR THEIR LOW WATER USE QUALITIES. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED USING A RAIN SENSING CONTROLLER AND BE ADJUSTABLE SO AS NOT TO WASTE WATER THROUGH RUNOFF OR OVERSPRAY. MINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS (STOP SIGN) - 20 FEET UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES - 5 FEET (10' FOR SEWER) ABOVE GROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES - 10 FEET DRIVEWAY (ENTRIES) - 10 FEET INTERSECTIONS (INTERSECTING CURB LINES OF TWO STREETS) - 25 FEET NOTES: - NO STRUCTURES OR LANDSCAPING THAT WOULD INHIBIT VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN OR OVER ANY SEWER ACCESS EASEMENT. - SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED AT PROPOSED TRANSFORMERS IN FORM OF SCREEN MULCH ALL REQUIRED PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH TO A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES, EXCLUDING SLOPES REQUIRING REVEGATION AND AREAS PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHOUT VEGETATION SHALL ALSO BE MULCHED TO THIS MINIMUM DEPTH. NOTE: TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE TREES ARE PLACED WITHIN 10 FEET OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING WALKS, CURBS, OR STREET PAVEMENTS OR WHERE NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE PLACED ADJACENT TO EXISTING TREES. THE ROOT BARRIER WILL NOT WRAP AROUND THE ROOT BALL. IRRIGATION - AN AUTOMATIC, ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, DISEASE-RESISTANT CONDITION. THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT FOR THE VEGETATION SELECTED. ALL PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WILL USE AN APPROVED RAIN SENSOR SHUTOFF DEVICE. THE INTENDED IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE A DRIP SYSTEM. ALL ON-SITE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROJECT HOA. ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF LA MESA LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AND WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE; THE CORE SUB-AREA DESIGN MANUAL; AND ALL OTHER STATE STANDARDS. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 8/15/24 SIGNATURE DATE REGISTRATION NO. 3503 EXP: 02-2025 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN JERICHO PROPOSED TOTAL LANDSCAPE : 31, 136 SQFT 33 EXISTING TREES ON SITE TO BE REMOVED 65 TOTAL PROPOSED TREES PROVIDED ON SITE 1 TREE PER EVERY 40 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. STREET FRONTAGE 240 LF. 6 PROPOSED STREET TREES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED 1642 SQFT OF HARDSCAPE AT PARKING AREA 169 SQFT OF LANDSCAPING PROVIDED FOR ADJACENT PARKING. 10% (164 SQFT REQ.) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 24,900 SF - (10) UNITS X 500 SF = 5,000 SF - (10) UNITS X 400 SF = 4,000 SF - (53) UNITS X 300 SF = 15,900 SF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 11,489 SF - (5) PLAN 2532 X 83 SF = 415 SF - (5) PLAN 2532X X 166 SF = 830 SF - (32) PLAN 1633 X 107 SF = 3,424 SF - (31) PLAN 1637 X 220 SF = 6,820 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 15,200 SF TOTAL NOTES: I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUB PLANTING TO BE PROVIDED AT SLOPE AREAS TO HELP REDUCE POTENTIAL EROSION OF SLOPES. BARK MULCH TO BE USED IN PLANTING AREAS AND NOT TO EXCEED 30% OF TOTAL PLANTING AREA. Page 319 of 2604 X X X

BROADMOOR DR JERICHO RD T T M M M M M MW MW
BF
BF
BF
BF BF
3  3  3  3  3  3  3  3  ))  ))  ))  ))  )) 
))  ))  )) 
)) 
3  %/'* )) 
3  %/'* %/'*
%/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  )) 
 3 
 ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  BENCH BENCH BENCH X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 37'-8" 20'-3" 22'-9" 27'-9" 42'-3" SS SYM. QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS TREES 5 PARKINSONIA X 'DESERT MUSEUM' DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 24" BOX L 12 RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX L COLUMNAR 45 CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS 'STRICTA' COLUMNAR ITALIAN CYPRESS 15 GAL L 35 PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE 15 GAL M COMMON AREAS / ACCENT ( 24" BOX, MAX SPREAD 20` / MAX H 2 CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 24" BOX L COURTYARD TREES ( 24" BOX, MAX SPREAD 16`/MAX HT 20`) 2 CHILOPSIS LINEARIS 'ART'S SEEDLESS' ART'S SEEDLESS DESERT WILLOW 24" BOX L 3 RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'MAGNIFICENT' MAGNIFICENT INDIAN HAWTHORN 24" BOX M 1 UMBELLULARIA CALIFORNICA BAY LAUREL 24" BOX M PALMS 2 SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANA QUEEN PALM 12` BTH M SLOPE ( 50% 15 GAL, 50% 24" BOX) 14 ARBUTUS UNEDO STRAWBERRY TREE MULTI-TRUNK 15 GAL L 14 MELALEUCA LINARIIFOLIA FLAXLEAF PAPERBARK 15 GAL L 5 QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 15 GAL L 5 RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC MULTI-TRUNK 15 GAL L STREET TREES6 KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA CHINESE FLAME TREE 24" BOX M ACCENT GRASSES 18 CAREX PRAEGRACILIS CALIFORNIA FIELD SEDGE 1 GAL M 47 CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM SMALL CAPE RUSH 1 GAL L 69 FESTUCA X 'SISKIYOU BLUE' SISKIYOU BLUE FESCUE 1 GAL L 85 MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS PINK MUHLY GRASS 1 GAL M ACCENT SHRUB9 AGAVE ATTENUATA FOXTAIL AGAVE 5 GAL L 3 ANIGOZANTHOS X 'BUSH GOLD' BUSH GOLD KANGAROO PAW 5 GAL L 3 PHORMIUM X 'DARK DELIGHT' DARK DELIGHT PURPLE FLAX 5 GAL M SHRUB (SMALL, 50% 1 GAL, 50% 5 GAL.) 60 DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' VARIEGATED FLAX LILY 5 GAL M 138 DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL L 5 LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA MAT RUSH 5 GAL L SHRUBS - (MEDIUM, 50% 1 GAL, 50% 5 GAL.) 28 BOUGAINVILLEA X 'TEMPLE FIRE' TEMPLE FIRE BOUGAINVILLEA 5 GAL L 49 CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' LITTLE JOHN WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL L 16 CARISSA MACROCARPA NATAL PLUM 5 GAL L 22 LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM 'TEXANUM' TEXAS JAPANESE PRIVET 5 GAL M 12 MYRTUS COMMUNIS COMMON MYRTLE 5 GAL L 7 ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'TUSCAN BLUE' TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY 5 GAL L SLOPE SHRUBS (50% 1 GAL., 50% 5 GAL.) 22 CISTUS X PURPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE 5 GAL L 16 LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS PURPLE TRAILING LANTANA 5 GAL L 7 RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA LEMONADE BERRY 5 GAL L VINES 22 DOLICHANDRA UNGUIS-CATI CAT'S CLAW CREEPER 5 GAL SYM. QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS SPACING GROUND COVERS2,749 SF ARTIFICIAL TURF ARTIFICIAL TURF FLAT 7,733 BACCHARIS PILULARIS DWARF COYOTE BRUSH FLAT L 12" o.c. 2,819 SENECIO SERPENS BLUE CHALKSTICKS FLAT L 24" o.c. S*pd CMLMLMRH1 PLANT SCHEDULE 2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1  THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN INTENT OF THIS PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE PLANT MATERIAL THAT ACCENTS AND FRAMES THE ARCHITECTURE AND ENHANCES THE PEDESTRIAN SCALE OF THE PROJECT. STREET TREES ARE CONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDING AREAS AND WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE ADJACENT COMMUNITY. PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SCREEN AND BUFFER UNSIGHTLY ELEMENTS AND PROVIDE PRIVACY. TREES HAVE BEEN PLACED TO BEAUTIFY THE SITE AND TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE SITE. THE PLANT MATERIALS THAT HAVE BEEN SELECTED WERE DONE SO FOR THEIR LOW WATER USE QUALITIES. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED USING A RAIN SENSING CONTROLLER AND BE ADJUSTABLE SO AS NOT TO WASTE WATER THROUGH RUNOFF OR OVERSPRAY. DESIGN INTENT STATEMENT MINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS (STOP SIGN) - 20 FEET UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES - 5 FEET (10' FOR SEWER) ABOVE GROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES - 10 FEET DRIVEWAY (ENTRIES) - 10 FEET INTERSECTIONS (INTERSECTING CURB LINES OF TWO STREETS) - 25 FEET NOTES: - NO STRUCTURES OR LANDSCAPING THAT WOULD INHIBIT VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN OR OVER ANY SEWER ACCESS EASEMENT. - SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED AT PROPOSED TRANSFORMERS IN FORM OF SCREEN MULCH ALL REQUIRED PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH TO A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES, EXCLUDING SLOPES REQUIRING REVEGATION AND AREAS PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHOUT VEGETATION SHALL ALSO BE MULCHED TO THIS MINIMUM DEPTH. NOTE: TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE TREES ARE PLACED WITHIN 10 FEET OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING WALKS, CURBS, OR STREET PAVEMENTS OR WHERE NEW PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE PLACED ADJACENT TO EXISTING TREES. THE ROOT BARRIER WILL NOT WRAP AROUND THE ROOT BALL. IRRIGATION - AN AUTOMATIC, ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE VEGETATION IN A HEALTHY, DISEASE-RESISTANT CONDITION. THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT FOR THE VEGETATION SELECTED. ALL PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WILL USE AN APPROVED RAIN SENSOR SHUTOFF DEVICE. THE INTENDED IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE A DRIP SYSTEM. ALL ON-SITE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE PROJECT HOA. ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF LA MESA LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS, LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AND WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE; THE CORE SUB-AREA DESIGN MANUAL; AND ALL OTHER STATE STANDARDS. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 10/24/24 SIGNATURE DATE REGISTRATION NO. 3503 EXP: 02-2025 TOT LOT AMENITY AREA: SEE SHEET L-2 COURTYARD AMENITY AREA: SEE SHEET L-2 COLUMNAR TREE/SHRUB TO ACCENT ARCHITECTURE, TYP. ENHANCED PAVING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, TYP. ENHANCED PAVING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, TYP. COLUMNAR TREE/SHRUB TO ACCENT ARCHITECTURE, TYP. BOCCE COURT W/ GATHERING AREA PROPOSED TOTAL LANDSCAPE : 31, 136 SQFT 33 EXISTING TREES ON SITE TO BE REMOVED 65 TOTAL PROPOSED TREES PROVIDED ON SITE 1 TREE PER EVERY 40 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. STREET FRONTAGE 240 LF. 6 PROPOSED STREET TREES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED 1642 SQFT OF HARDSCAPE AT PARKING AREA 169 SQFT OF LANDSCAPING PROVIDED FOR ADJACENT PARKING. 10% (164 SQFT REQ.) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 24,900 SF - (10) UNITS X 500 SF = 5,000 SF - (10) UNITS X 400 SF = 4,000 SF - (53) UNITS X 300 SF = 15,900 SF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 11,489 SF - (5) PLAN 2532 X 83 SF = 415 SF - (5) PLAN 2532X X 166 SF = 830 SF - (32) PLAN 1633 X 107 SF = 3,424 SF - (31) PLAN 1637 X 220 SF = 6,820 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 15,200 SF TOTAL SITE DISTANCE TRIANGLES PROPOSED MAILBOX & USPS PARKING STALL RETAINING WALL PER CIVIL ENGINEER RETAINING WALL PER CIVIL ENGINEER PEDESTRIAN WALK, TYP. PEDESTRIAN WALK, TYP. PEDESTRIAN WALK, TYP. PEDESTRIAN WALK, TYP. PEDESTRIAN WALK, TYP. PEDESTRIAN WALK, TYP. RETAINING WALL PER CIVIL ENGINEER *ALL PLANTING IS CONCEPTUAL AND FINAL PLANT SELECTION AND QUANTITIES TO BE FINALIZED DURING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE* /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 3/$17,1*3/$1 -(5,&+2 BIKE STORAGE AREA BIKE STORAGE AREA DENOTES DISTANCE BETWEEN STREET TREES, TYP. NOTES: I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUB PLANTING TO BE PROVIDED AT SLOPE AREAS TO HELP REDUCE POTENTIAL EROSION OF SLOPES. BARK MULCH TO BE USED IN PLANTING AREAS AND NOT TO EXCEED 30% OF TOTAL PLANTING AREA. AMENITY AREAS AT ENTRY: SEE SHEET L-2 (6) STREET TREES *STREET TREES TO BE ON SITE AS EXISTING R.O.W DOES NOT ALLOW FOR TREES TO BE PLANTED* Page 320 of 2604 X X X %/'* X X X X X X X X X X X X L L L L L L L L L L LL L L ** * ** CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CMCMSS T MW MW X ************ *********** **** LM LM LM LM LM LM LMLM RH RH RH RH RH RH RH LM LM LM LMLM LM LM LM * * * * * * * ** T X X X X X X X X ******** pd pd pd 1 1 1 1 1 MW MW 2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1  /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 (1/$5*(M(176 AMENITY AREA AT ENTRY COURTYARD AMENITY AREA TOT LOT AMENITY AREA PLANTER AREA, TYP. TURF OPEN SPACE AREA BBQ COUNTER W/ OVERHEAD AND GATHERING SPACE ACCENT TREE, TYP. PLANTER AREA, TYP. FIRE FEATURE & GATHERING SPACE AT ENTRY PEDESTRIAN WALK, TYP. TURF AREA, TYP. PALMS TO FRAME ENTRY INTO AMENITY COURTYARD PLANTER AREA, TYP. PLANTER AREA, TYP. COLUMNAR TREE/SHRUB TO ACCENT ARCHITECTURE, TYP. GATHERING SPACE WITH WATER FEATURE PEDESTRIAN WALK W/ DECORATIVE CONCRETE BANDING, TYP. CONCRETE MOW CURB AT TURF AREA, TYP. CANOPY TREES, TYP. MULTI-AGE TOT LOT EQUIPMENT DOUBLE BBQ COUNTER & GATHERING AREA TURF OPEN SPACE AREA PLANTER AREA, TYP. ACCENT TREE, TYP. CANOPY TREE, TYP. 42" HT TUBULAR STEEL FENCING TO HELP SCREEN TOT LOT AREA DECORATIVE PANELS TO ACCENT AREA ENTRY MONUMENT WALL STREET TREES (6) TOTAL HATCH DELINEATES PLANTING SPECIFIED FOR PARKING AREAS PARKING PLANTING AREA 6" CURB TO PROVIDE SEPARATION BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND PARKING PAVEMENT PEDESTRIAN WALK TREE DOUBLE STAKING DETAIL LEGEND 2341 TREE TRUNK SEE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS VINYL TREE TIE (4 REQUIRED) (2) 2" DIA. x 10' LODGE POLE PINE STAKES. TIE TREE TRUNK 6" ABOVE BENDING MOMENT OF TREE. TIE SHOULD PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY OF TRUNK, BUT NOT ALLOW RUBBING OF TRUNK AGAINST STAKE. CUT STAKES OFF 6" ABOVE TIES. FINISHED GRADE 4" HIGH WATERING BASIN (IF REQUIRED) INSTALL ARBOR GUARD AT THE BASE OF TREE IF IN LAWN AREA PLANT TABLET, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUANTITY PLAN SECTION 567 1235 476 4 1 3 8 8 A TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND 2341 ROOTBALL CROWN 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE AT SLOPE BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS PLANT TABLETS, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUANTITY FINISH SURFACE OF PAVED AREA 4" HIGH WATERING BASIN (IF REQUIRED) 3"-4" LAYER OF 2"-MINUS SHREDDED ORGANIC BARK MULCH NOTE: WHERE TREES ARE PLANTED IN TURF AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TURF A MIN. OF 12" DIA. AT THE BASE OF THE TREE. INSTALL AN ARBOR GUARD AT THE BASE OF THE TRUNK. 56789 7 8 5 6 2 1 9 3 4 B GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND 2341 PREPARED SOIL FINISHED GRADE CONCRETE CURB OR HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AS INDICATED ON PLAN CONCRETE MOW STRIP OR HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AS INDICATED ON PLAN PLANT PER PLANT FULL O.C. PER PLANT LEGEND 12 x O.C. SPACING PER PLANT LEGEND AT EDGE OF PLANTING AREA PLANTING TABLET, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUANTITY 3"-4" LAYER OF 2"-MINUS SHREDDED ORGANIC BARK MULCH SECTION PLAN 2" 56789 3 1 8 5 2 9 4 3 5 4 3 6 7 6 7 6 C ROOT BARRIER DETAIL LEGEND 2341 CONCRETE SIDE WALK OR HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AS INDICATED ON PLAN DEEPROOT #UB24-2 (OR APPROVED EQUAL) INSTALL IN 10' LENGTHS, TYP. SUBGRADE PLANTS PER PLAN CONCRETE CURB OR HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AS INDICATED ON PLAN NOTE: ALL TREES WITH 10' OF ANY WALK, CURB, DRIVE, BUILDING, UTILITY OR HARDSCAPE ELEMENT SHALL RECEIVE 10' OF ROOT BARRIER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT SPECIFICATION FOR EQUAL TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND CLIENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHAING MATERIALS 5' 5' OF TREE CL 1 2425 123 SECTION PLAN 5 D HATCH DELINEATES PARKING AREA PARKING LOT AREA = 1642 SQFT 10% OF AREA (REQUIRED) = 164 SQFT LANDSCAPING PROVIDED = 169 SQFT Page 321 of 2604 3  ))  %/'* )) 
 3 
 X X X X X X X X X LLLLLLLL CMCMCMCMCMCMCMMMM MM M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M M M M M M ********** ******** ******** ********* SYM. QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS TREES 5 PARKINSONIA X 'DESERT MUSEUM' DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 24" BOX L 12 RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX L COLUMNAR 45 CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS 'STRICTA' COLUMNAR ITALIAN CYPRESS 15 GAL L 35 PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE 15 GAL M COMMON AREAS / ACCENT ( 24" BOX, MAX SPREAD 20` / MAX H 2 CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 24" BOX L COURTYARD TREES ( 24" BOX, MAX SPREAD 16`/MAX HT 20`) 2 CHILOPSIS LINEARIS 'ART'S SEEDLESS' ART'S SEEDLESS DESERT WILLOW 24" BOX L 3 RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'MAGNIFICENT' MAGNIFICENT INDIAN HAWTHORN 24" BOX M 1 UMBELLULARIA CALIFORNICA BAY LAUREL 24" BOX M PALMS 2 SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANA QUEEN PALM 12` BTH M SLOPE ( 50% 15 GAL, 50% 24" BOX) 14 ARBUTUS UNEDO STRAWBERRY TREE MULTI-TRUNK 15 GAL L 14 MELALEUCA LINARIIFOLIA FLAXLEAF PAPERBARK 15 GAL L 5 QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 15 GAL L 5 RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC MULTI-TRUNK 15 GAL L STREET TREES6 KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA CHINESE FLAME TREE 24" BOX M ACCENT GRASSES 18 CAREX PRAEGRACILIS CALIFORNIA FIELD SEDGE 1 GAL M 47 CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM SMALL CAPE RUSH 1 GAL L 69 FESTUCA X 'SISKIYOU BLUE' SISKIYOU BLUE FESCUE 1 GAL L 85 MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS PINK MUHLY GRASS 1 GAL M ACCENT SHRUB9 AGAVE ATTENUATA FOXTAIL AGAVE 5 GAL L 3 ANIGOZANTHOS X 'BUSH GOLD' BUSH GOLD KANGAROO PAW 5 GAL L 3 PHORMIUM X 'DARK DELIGHT' DARK DELIGHT PURPLE FLAX 5 GAL M SHRUB (SMALL, 50% 1 GAL, 50% 5 GAL.) 60 DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' VARIEGATED FLAX LILY 5 GAL M 138 DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL L 5 LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA MAT RUSH 5 GAL L SHRUBS - (MEDIUM, 50% 1 GAL, 50% 5 GAL.) 28 BOUGAINVILLEA X 'TEMPLE FIRE' TEMPLE FIRE BOUGAINVILLEA 5 GAL L 49 CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' LITTLE JOHN WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL L 16 CARISSA MACROCARPA NATAL PLUM 5 GAL L 22 LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM 'TEXANUM' TEXAS JAPANESE PRIVET 5 GAL M 12 MYRTUS COMMUNIS COMMON MYRTLE 5 GAL L 7 ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'TUSCAN BLUE' TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY 5 GAL L SLOPE SHRUBS (50% 1 GAL., 50% 5 GAL.) 22 CISTUS X PURPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE 5 GAL L 16 LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS PURPLE TRAILING LANTANA 5 GAL L 7 RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA LEMONADE BERRY 5 GAL L VINES 22 DOLICHANDRA UNGUIS-CATI CAT'S CLAW CREEPER 5 GAL SYM. QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS SPACING GROUND COVERS2,749 SF ARTIFICIAL TURF ARTIFICIAL TURF FLAT 7,733 BACCHARIS PILULARIS DWARF COYOTE BRUSH FLAT L 12" o.c. 2,819 SENECIO SERPENS BLUE CHALKSTICKS FLAT L 24" o.c. 21,284 SF GROUNDCOVER 726 SF SLOPE PLANTING S*pd CMLMLMRH1 PLANT SCHEDULE BF M BENCH BENCH BENCH X RH RH RH RH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMRHRH RHRH RHRH LM LM LM LMLM LM LMLM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -(5,&+2 2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1  TYPICAL BUILDING PLANTING /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 (1/$5*(M(176 SHRUB PLANTING TO SOFTEN ARCHITECTURE, TYP. PLANTING TO HELP SCREEN AND SOFTEN RETAINING WALL, TYP. TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING TO SOFTEN ARCHITECTURE RETAINING WALL PER CIVIL ENGINEER SHRUB PLANTING TO SOFTEN ARCHITECTURE AT ENTRIES, TYP. TYPICAL WALL PLANTING ELEVATION VINE PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND 2341 VINE ATTACHED TO TRELLIS W/ VINYL PLANT TIES NURSERY STAKES TO BE REMOVED BUILDING SURFACE CROWN - 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE 4" HIGH WATERING BASIN (IF REQUIRED) PLANT TABLETS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL MIX (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ROOTBALL NOTE: ALTERNATE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT, VINE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO SURFACE OF FREESTANDING MASONRY WALLS W/ CLEAR EPOXY VINE TIES, DO NOT ATTACH VINES TO BUILDING VINES W/ NURSERY ESPALIER STAKE TO BE MOVED OUT OF ROOTBALL AND INSTALLED 6" FROM BUILDING TOP OF WATERING BASING TO BE MIN. 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OF BUILDING 1234 5 6 7 10 2xROOTBALL DIAMETER 9 8 5678910 E RETAINING WALL PLANTING AT HIGHEST EXPOSED PORTION OF WALL BUILDING 6 PLAN VIEW OF PLANTING AT PERIMETER RETAINING WALL A4 A4 A4 A4 Page 322 of 2604 X X X

BROADMOOR DR JERICHO RD T T M M M M M MW MW
BF
BF
BF
BF BF
3  3  3  3  3  3  3  3  ))  ))  ))  ))  )) 
))  ))  )) 
)) 
3  %/'* )) 
3  %/'* %/'*
%/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  )) 
 3 
 ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  ))  3 

BENCH BENCH BENCH X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MPRMVFSFZ E C SS 37'-8" 20'-3" 22'-9" 27'-9" 42'-3" RH RH RH RH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMRHRH RHRH RHRH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMLM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION PSI HUNTER RZWS-SLEEVE-18-CV 18" LONG RZWS WITH FILTER FABRIC SLEEVE, .25GPM OR .50GPM BUBBLER OPTIONS, CHECK VALVE, 1/2" SWING JOINT FOR CONNECTION TO 1/2" PIPE SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION HUNTER ICZ-101-40 (DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT) 1" ICV GLOBE VALVE W/ 1" HY100 FILTER SYSTEM. PRESSURE REG.: 40PSI. FLOW: 2-20 GPM. USE ICZ-101-LF-40 FOR LESS THAN 2 GPM. INSTALL ONE VALVE PER JUMBO RECT. VALVE BOX W/ LOCKING GREEN COVER AND `RCV` HEAT BRANDED ON COVER. VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MANIFOLDS ISOLATED FROM THE MAINLINE BY A BALL VALVE, LINE SIZE. HUNTER ICZ-151-40 (DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT) 1-1/2" ICV GLOBE VALVE W/ 1" HY100 FILTER SYSTEM. PRESSURE REG.: 40PSI. FLOW: 20-60 GPM. INSTALL ONE VALVE PER JUMBO RECT. VALVE BOX W/ LOCKING GREEN COVER AND `RCV` HEAT BRANDED ON COVER. VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MANIFOLDS ISOLATED FROM THE MAINLINE BY A BALL VALVE, LINE SIZE. PIPE TRANSITION POINT ABOVE GRADE PIPE TRANSITION POINT FROM PVC LATERAL TO DRIP TUBING WITH RISER TO ABOVE GRADE INSTALLATION. FLUSH VALVE PROVIDE A PLD-LOC CAP AT END OF DRIP DISCHARGE HEADER, INSTALL FLUSH VALVE INSIDE A SEPARATE VALVE BOX, ONE AT EACH END OF THE TUBING RUNS IN EACH DIRECTION, INSTALL 18" FROM PAVING. ALSO PROVIDE ECO-INDICATOR ALONG EXHAUST MANIFOLD OF EACH DRIP IRRIGATION END LINE, CONNECT TO PVC EXHAUST LATERAL WITH TEE AND USE SWING JOINT HUNTER PLD-AVR (DRIP AIR RELIEF VALVE) AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE, PLD-AVR, INSTALLED WITH A COMBINATION TEE. INSTALL AIR RELIEF ASSEMBLY INSIDE A 6" ROUND VALVE BOX AT THE HIGH POINT OF EACH PLANTER, MULTIPLE ARV`S SHALL BE REQUIRED PER RCV, VERIFY QUANTITY PRIOR TO STARTING WORK, INSTALL VALVE BOX 18" FROM PAVING AND AT HIGH POINT OF PLANTER AREA AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE HUNTER HDL-04-12-CV HDL-04-12-CV: HUNTER DRIPLINE W/ 0.4 GPH EMITTERS AT 12" O.C. CHECK VALVE, DARK BROWN TUBING WITH TAN STRIPING. DRIPLINE LATERALS SPACED AT 16" APART, WITH EMITTERS OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. INSTALL WITH HUNTER PLD BARBED OR PLD-LOC FITTINGS. ALL TUBING SHALL BE INSTALLED 3" BELOW MULCH GRADE W/ 9" WIRE STAKES FIVE (5) FEET ON CENTER; VERIFY THE LAYOUT AND SPACING IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO STARTING WORK SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION HUNTER ICV-G-FS-AS-ADJ (RCV) 1", 1-1/2", 2", AND 3" PLASTIC ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, GLOBE CONFIGURATION, WITH NPT THREADED INLET/OUTLET, WITH FILTER SENTRY. INSTALL ONE VALVE PER STD. RECT. VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING GREEN COVER AND `RCV` HEAT BRANDED ON COVER. VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MANIFOLDS ISOLATED FROM THE MAINLINE BY A BALL VALVE LINE SIZE. HUNTER HQ-44LRC (QCV) QUICK COUPLER VALVE, YELLOW RUBBER LOCKING COVER, RED BRASS AND STAINLESS STEEL, WITH 1" NPT INLET, 2-PIECE BODY. INSTALL IN A 10" ROUND VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING GREEN COVER HEAT BRANDED WITH 'QCV'. INSTALL EACH QCV ON A 1 1/2" STUB-OUT OFF MAINLINE ISOLATED WITH A 1 1/2" BALL VALVE AND INSTALLED AT 200` O.C LASCO FITTINGS TUBV-SC (BALL VALVE) 1", 1-1/2", 2", AND 3" PLASTIC FULL BLOCK TRUE UNION BALL VALVE. SHUT OFF/ISOLATION VALVE TO ELIMINATE WATER HAMMER. INSTALL SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE. INSTALL IN VALVE BOX WITH GREEN LID, HEAT BRAND LID WITH "BV". HUNTER IBV-FS (MASTER VALVE) 1", 1-1/2", 2", AND 3" BRASS ELECTRIC MASTER VALVE, GLOBE CONFIGURATION, WITH NPT THREADED INLET/OUTLET, FOR COMMERCIAL/MUNICIPAL USE. WITH FILTER SENTRY FACTORY INSTALLED OPTION. INSTALL IN A `JUMBO` SIZED VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING GREEN COVER AND `MV` HEAT BRANDED ON COVER. ZURN 975XL (BACKFLOW) REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE W/ MODEL `YBP` WYE STRAINER. ALL PIPING BETWEEN METER AND BACKFLOW DEVICE SHALL BE `K` COPPER OR RED BRASS. INSTALL IN A VIT STRONGBOX STAINLESS STEEL BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE #SBBC-XXSS, SIZED TO FIT BACKFLOW. ITS CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY IRRIGATION CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY IN STAINLESS STEEL ENCLOSURE, SEE TABLES FOR MODEL AND STATION COUNT. CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE A DESIGNATED RECTANGULAR PULL BOX INSTALLED AT PEDESTAL BASE. CONTACT DARYL GREEN AT IMPERIAL TECHNICAL SERVICES (ITS) PHONE: (949) 584-7311 HUNTER SOLAR-SYNC SOLAR, RAIN FREEZE SENSOR WITH OUTDOOR INTERFACE, INSTALL AS NOTED. WIRED. FLOMEC QS200-15 (FLOW SENSOR PROVIDED BY ITS) 1-1/2" INSERTION ULTRASONIC FLOWMETER, SCH. 80 PVC HOUSING, IS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY. 0.55-82 GPM RANGE, MAX. PRESSURE 150 PSI. 2-WIRE CONNECTOR W/ LED INDICATORS FOR POWER AND PULSE. WIRE TO CONTROLLER USING P7171D CABLE IN 1" CONDUIT, INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER`S RECOMMENDATIONS. MULTIPLE FLOW SENSORS REQUIRE SEPARATE CONDUIT RUNS. EZ-FLO FERTILIZING SYSTEMS EZ010-FX ONE SYSTEM FEEDS ALL ZONES, DRIP OR SPRINKLER. INSTALL DIRECTLY IN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM MAIN LINE AFTER THE BACK FLOW PREVENTER. COUPLING CONNECTION PER MAINLINE SIZE, INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER`S RECOMMENDATIONS IN CARSON #1730-24 HDPE SUPER JUMBO RECTANGULAR XL VALVE BOX. CONTRACTOR TO FILL TANK WITH #GRM 102030 AT BEGINNING OF PLANT INSTALLATION AND SHALL PROVIDE A FULL TANK UPON MAINTENANCE TURNOVER. TANK CAPACITY: 9.4 G 2-WIRE CONTROL WIRE HUNTER IDWIRE1-BLU IRRIGATION CONTROL CABLE. RED AND BLUE 14 AWG TWISTED PAIR IN BLUE JACKET (U.L. APPROVED), PAIGE #170801BU. CONNECT WITH APPROVED WATERPROOF CONNECTORS AND INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. ROUTE WIRES TO EACH VALVE MANIFOLD AND PROVIDE SEPARATE 1 1/4" CONDUIT FOR WIRE ADJACENT TO MAINLINE. FOR SERVICEABILITY, DO NOT INTERCONNECT INDIVIDUAL CABLE PATHS. TERMINATE EACH PATH ON CONTROLLER TERMINAL BLOCK. INSTALL GROUNDING PLATE OR 8` GROUNDING ROD WITH HUNTER DUAL-S SURGE ARRESTOR. INSTALL AT CONTROLLER AND AT THE END OF EACH 2-WIRE PATH PERPENDICULAR TO PATH IN 6" ROUND BOX. COPPER WIRE SHALL BE CAD WELDED TO PLATE OR ROD. GROUND EVERY 12TH DECODER OR EVERY 1,000 FEET FROM CONTROLLER, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. INSTALL PER ASIC GENERAL GROUNDING GUIDELINES. INSTALL ICD-XXX DECODER WITH SURGE SUPPRESSION AND GROUND WIRE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DECODER SIZE NECESSARY TO HANDLE VALVES AT MANIFOLD. 3M DBR/Y-6 PRE-FILLED WIRE CONNECTORS, USE ON ALL WIRE CONNECTIONS IN VALVE OR PULL BOXES ONLY CARSON VALVE BOXES SIZE PER EQUIPMENT LEGEND, WITH T-COVER LIDS AND CAPTIVE BOLT AND LOC-KIT. FOR ROUND DRIP EMITTERS USE MODEL 510, 7" ECONO SHALL BE MODEL 708, 10" ROUND SHALL BE MODEL 910, 12" STANDARD RECT. SHALL BE MODEL 1419, 12" JUMBO RECT. SHALL BE MODEL 1220, SUPER JUMBO SHALL BE MODEL 1324, AND SUPER JUMBO XL SHALL BE MODEL 1730. VALVE BOXES SHALL HAVE GREEN HDPE BODY AND GREEN LIDS IN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS, AND TAN LIDS IN ROCK MULCH. USE PURPLE FOR RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS. FOR USE IN NON-VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SITUATIONS ONLY. DO NOT INSTALL IN CONCRETE OR ASPHALT. ELECTRICAL SERVICE 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL POWER, PROVIDED BY ELECTRICIAN, VERIFY LOCATION IN THE FIELD. 0.25 0.50 FAMVCSSFSFZ NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL E IRRIGATION SCHEDULE HUNTER SJ SWING JOINTS FOR 1/2" THREADS USE SJ-512, 3/4" THREADS USE SJ-712, 1" THREADS USE LASCO G132-412, 1" QUICK COUPLER VALVES USE LASCO G132S-212 WITH MALE BRASS STABILIZER ELBOW, 3/4" QUICK COUPLER VALVES USE LASCO G132T-212 WITH MALE BRASS STABILIZER ELBOW. PULL BOX PULL BOXES FOR WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500` O.C. AND AT THE ENDS OF ALL SLEEVES UNDER PAVING. PULL BOXES SHALL BE 10" ROUND WITH LOCKING LID VALCON 5000 SERIES ANTI DRAIN VALVE USED ON ALL SPRINKLERS WITH LOW HEAD DRAINAGE UNCONTROLLABLE BY FACTORY INTEGRAL SPRINKLER HEAD CHECK VALVE. WILKINS #500-HLR PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE 500-HLR SERIES PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE WITH 10 TO 125 PSI SPRING RANGE, SIZE AND PRESSURE SETTING AS NOTED. WILKINS BR-4 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL LATERAL LINES WHERE SPRINKLER HEADS ARE LOCATED AT AN ELEVATION MORE THAN 50` LOWER THAN THE RCV. SET PRESSURE TO CONTROL PRESSURE DUE TO THIS ELEVATION CHANGE, SIZE PER LATERAL LINE SERVING SYSTEM. INSTALL IN A 10" ROUND VALVE BOX BELOW GRADE. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL SUCH PRV`S IN THE FIELD AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON RECORD DRAWINGS. WATER METER 1-1/2" IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: CRESLINE WEST - PVC SCHEDULE 40 1 1/2" & SMALLER - SCH.40 W/ SCH.40 SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: CRESLINE WEST - PVC CLASS 315 SDR 13.5 2"-3" - CL. 315 W/ SCH.80 SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS, 2 1/2"-3" FITTINGS SHALL BE THRUST BLOCKED IRRIGATION MAINLINE: CRESLINE WEST - PVC SCHEDULE 40 1 1/2" & SMALLER - SCH.40 W/ SCH.40 SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS IRRIGATION MAINLINE: CRESLINE WEST - PVC CLASS 315 SDR 13.5 2"-3" - CL. 315 W/ SCH.80 SOLVENT WELD FITTINGS, 2 1/2"-3" FITTINGS SHALL BE THRUST BLOCKED NO SYMBOL PB NO SYMBOL PR NO SYMBOL M 2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1  IRRIGATION NOTES: -MOISTURE SENSING DEVICES AND RAIN SENSOR OVERRIDE SYSTEMS TO BE USED ON SITE IRRIGATION SYSTESMS. - THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED AND ADJUSTED TO AVOID OVERSPRAY, LOW HEAD DRAINAGE, AND RUNOFF INTO NON-IRRIGATED AREAS. -THE SPRINKLER DESIGN UTILIZES MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATES WITHIN EACH CIRCUIT AND SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR 100% COVERAGE (SPACING OF HEADS AT 50% OF THE SPRAY DIAMETER). -THE SPRINKLER DESIGN SHALL BE CIRCUITED INTO SEPARATE “HYDROZONES” WHICH SERVICE PLANTS WITH SIMILAR WATER REQUIREMENTS AND WHICH ARE LOCATED IN SIMILAR SOLAR EXPOSURES. -DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEMS IS UTILIZED WHEREVER FEASIBLE. -ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED BELOW GRADE (EXCEPT FOR APPROVED DRIP SYSTEMS) AND SHALL UTILIZE AN AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER WITH DUAL OR MULTIPLE PROGRAMMING AND MULTIPLE START CYCLES. *IRRIGATION PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. FINAL IRRIGATION PLANS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE FINALIZED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE* /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 ,55,*$7,213/$1 -(5,&+2 Page 323 of 2604

2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1  /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 ,55,*$7,21'(7$,/6 MASTER VALVE DETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN COVER, USE STAINLESS BOLT, NUT, AND WASHER. BOX TO BE PLACED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "MV" ONTO LID. MASTER CONTROL VALVE, SEE LEGEND FOR SPEC. 24" WIRE LOOP FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS BRASS CLOSE NIPPLE (3 REQ'D). PVC SCH 80 FEMALE ADAPTER (2 REQ'D) PVC MAINLINE TO FLOW SENSOR, PIPE PER SPECS. BRASS UNION (4) BRICK SUPPORTS LANDSCAPE FABRIC 3 4" ROCK, 2 CUBIC FT. PVC MAINLINE PIPE FROM BACKFLOW PER SPECS. NOTE: - USE 45 DEGREE ELLS TO ACHIEVE MAINLINE DEPTH FROM SUPPLY SIDE OF THE MASTER VALVE ASSEMBLY. ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. 2 3 5678910 13 111213 4 6 5 7 11 6 12 6 9 10 7 8 A REMOTE CONTROL VALVE DETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS LATERAL PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN COVER, USE STAINLESS BOLT, NUT, AND WASHER. BOX TO BE PLACED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "RCV" AND CONTROL STATION # ONTO LID. FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS 24" WIRE LOOP VALVE ID TAG SCH. 80 PVC THREADED ELL OR TEE CONTROL VALVE, SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS SCH 80 PVC NIPPLES (TYP)., LENGTH AS REQUIRED (4) BRICK SUPPORTS IRRIGATION MAINLINE OR MANIFOLD SUB-MAIN 3 4" ROCK GRAVEL, 2 CUBIC FEET LANDSCAPE FABRIC SCH. 80 UNION SCH. 80 FEMALE ADAPTER NOTES: - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. - IF MAINLINE OR MANIFOLD SUB-MAIN IS AT VALVE DEPTH, TEE INTO VALVE WITH SCH.80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. 2 3 4 7 6 5 5678910 8 91011 14 13 12 11121314 15 15 B BALL VALVE - TRUE UNION DETAIL LEGEND 2341 FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN COVER, USE STAINLESS BOLT, NUT, AND WASHER. BOX TO BE PLACED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "BV" ONTO LID. DUAL UNION CONNECTIONS AS PART OF BALL VALVE, THREADED IF SPECIFIED IN LEGEND FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS MAINLINE, DEPTH PER SPECS. (4) BRICK SUPPORTS 3 4" ROCK, 2 CUBIC FT. LANDSCAPE FABRIC PVC SCH 80 FEMALE ADAPTER PVC SCH 80 THREADED NIPPLE FLOW NOTES: - BOX TO BE INSTALLED TO ALLOW FOR PROPER OPERATION OF BALL VALVE HANDLE. - INSTALL AT RIGHT ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE EDGE. - INSTALL VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE PROPER VALVE INSTALLATION AT MAINLINE DEPTH. - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS SHALL HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. 1 2 3 5 4 5 6 6 8 7 78910 9 10 10 9 C VALVE MANIFOLD INSTALLATION DETAIL LEGEND 2341 IRRIGATION MAINLINE INSTALLED 18" OFF HARDSCAPE EDGE QUICK COUPLER VALVE ON SWING JOINT IN ROUND VALVE BOX HARDSCAPE EDGE SCH. 80 PVC UNION BALL TYPE ISOLATION VALVE, IF SPECIFIED SCH. 80 PVC TEE, SxSxS MAINLINE X MANIFOLD SIZE SCH. 80 PVC TEE, SxSxS, SIZE PER LARGEST VALVE MINIMUM 12" SEPARATION BETWEEN ALL VALVE BOXES IRRIGATION SUB-MAINLINE, SIZE PER LARGEST VALVE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE LATERAL LINE TO SPRINKLERS NOTE: - IF MANIFOLD SUB-MAIN IS AT VALVE DEPTH, TEE INTO VALVE WITH SCH.80 NIPPLE, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE 1245 5 548 67 10 8 411 9 9 10 63 11 7 D B B B NOTES: - INSTALLATION MUST CONFORM TO LOCAL CODES - CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE BACKFLOW CERTIFICATION. - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. - ALL BRASS OR COPPER BELOW GRADE SHALL HAVE AWWA C209 APPROVED PIPE TAPE. BACKFLOW DEVICE WITH PRESSURE REGULATORDETAIL LEGEND 2341 REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, PER LEGEND WYE STRAINER BRASS NIPPLES (LENGTH AS REQ.) FINISHED GRADE SCH.80 PVC FEMALE ADAPTER. PVC PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE, SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 12"X12"X12" CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS BRASS TXT ELL, LINE SIZE COPPER SXT ELL, LINE SIZE TYPE 'K' COPPER TUBING FROM WATER METER. V.I.T. STRONGBOX QP-30BF QUICK PAD, IF ENCLOSURE IS SPECIFIED, SET 2" ABOVE GRADE FILL BASE OF QUICKPAD WITH 3 4" ROCK TO TOP OF BASE OF UNIT STAINLESS STEEL ENCLOSURE (IF SPECIFIED) PRESSURE REGULATOR 567891011121314 1 2311 13 1445 10 9 12 8 7 6 E DETAIL LEGEND 2341 FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS EZ-FLO SHUT OFF VALVES PROPORTIONING CAP WITH FEED ADJUSTMENT KNOB AIR VENT VALVE VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING LID 36"Lx24"Wx24"H FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS WATER IN - CONNECT BLACK TUBE TO BLUE CONNECTIONS ON PROPORTIONING CAP AND COUPLING PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE MAIN LINE FROM BACKFLOW (4) BRICK SUPPORTS 3 4" ROCK, 3 CUBIC FEET 14" TUBING CLAMP - GREEN AND BLUE COUPLING TUBING CONNECTIONS EZ BALL VALVE COUPLING CONNECTOR - INSTALL ACCORDING TO WATER FLOW DIRECTION ARROW LANDSCAPE FABRIC EZ-FLO FERTIGATION UNIT PER PLAN PVC MAIN LINE TO VALVE MANIFOLD FERTILIZER OUT - CONNECT CLEAR TUBE TO GREEN CONNECTIONS ON PROPORTIONING CAP AND COUPLING FILL VALVE (DRAIN VALVE INCLUDED BUT NOT SHOWN) 3" 2" MIN. NOTES: - USE 45 DEGREE ELLS TO ACHIEVE MAINLINE DEPTH FROM DISCHARGE SIDE OF ASSEMBLY. - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. - FOLLOW ALL MANUFACTURER DIRECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. - USE ONLY APPROVED FERTIGATION FORMULAS. DO NOT USE ANY PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES OR FUNGICIDES IN UNIT. - USE VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE PROPER DEPTH. FLOW 1 2 3 2 4 5 56 7 8 6 78 9 910 11 10 1112 12 13 15 14 13 1415 16 1617 17 18 18 F FLOW SENSOR DETAIL LEGEND 2341 PVC MAINLINE FROM MASTER VALVE FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS 24" WIRE LOOP PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN COVER, USE STAINLESS BOLT, NUT, AND WASHER. BOX TO BE PLACED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "FS" ONTO LID. FLOW SENSOR, SEE LEGEND FOR SPECIFICATION FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS PVC MAINLINE TO RCV'S (4) BRICK SUPPORTS 3 4" ROCK, 2 CUBIC FEET LANDSCAPE FABRIC 1" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TO CONTROLLER FLOW NOTES: - NO FITTINGS 10x PIPE O.D. UPSTREAM OF SENSOR, NO FITTINGS 5x PIPE O.D. DOWNSTREAM OF SENSOR. - INSTALL FLOW SENSOR PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, ROUTE WIRES THROUGH CONDUIT TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLER. - USE 45 DEGREE ELLS TO ACHIEVE MAINLINE DEPTH ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE FLOW SENSOR. FLOW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5678910 11 10 9 11 G DECODER - FLOW SENSOR CONNECTIONDETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 WIRE FROM SENSOR DECODER TO GROUNDING ROD USING CAD WELD (1 OF 2) GROUNDING ROD PER ASIC SPECIFICATIONS SENSOR DECODER PER LEGEND COMMUNICATION CABLE PER LEGEND TO/FROM DEVICES (FIELD DECODER, SENSOR DECODER, OR CONTROLLER) WIRE FROM SENSOR DECODER TO FLOW SENSOR WATERPROOF CONNECTION PER LEGEND (1 OF 4) FLOW SENSOR PER LEGEND AND DETAILS SEE FLOW SENSOR DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION METHOD NOTES: - SEE FLOW SENSOR DETAIL AND LEGEND FOR FLOW SENSOR INSTALLATION METHODS AND MATERIALS. - SECONDARY WIRE RUN BETWEEN SENSOR DECODER AND FLOW METER NOT TO EXCEED 150' WITH 14 GAUGE WIRE. - PLACE 5' OF EXTRA WIRE IN VALVE BOX FOR SERVICING. - INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. WIRE SPLICE STEPS 1. STRIP WIRES 12" TO 5 8". USING LINEMANS PLIERS OR OTHER STYLE TOOL, TWIST ENDS TOGETHER MIN 3 TIMES. INSERT INTO SCOTCHLOK ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND ROTATE CLOCKWISE UNTIL ADDITIONAL FORCE IS REQUIRED. 2. INSERT THE SPLICE INTO THE GEL-FILLED INSULATOR TUBE. PUSH PAST THE LOCKING FINGERS TO HOLD THE SCOTHLOK CONNECTOR IN PLACE. 3. POSITION WIRE CHANNELS AND SNAP INSULATOR TUBE COVER CLOSED. 2 3 4 5 6 567 7 8 8 H SOLAR SYNC MOUNTED TO EAVE DETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 EAVE OF BUILDING PLASTIC TIE DOWN STRAP SENSOR, SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS MOUNTING BRACKET, INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS IF WIRED MODEL IS SPECIFIED, PROVIDE WIRE BACK TO CONTROLLER SECURE WIRE WITH CABLE TIE BRACKET, 3' O.C. MIN. 2345 5 6 6NOTE: - MOUNT SENSOR PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS - MOUNT SENSOR IN A LOCATION WITH EXPOSURE TO THE SUN AND RAINFALL WHICH IS UNOBSTRUCTED I DRIPLINE PROFILE DETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 TEE TOP OF MULCH PRESSURE-COMPENSATING IN-LINE EMITTER TUBING PER LEGEND TIE DOWN STAKE 5 FINISHED GRADE 2 3 4 5 J DRIP LAYOUT - CENTER FEED DETAIL LEGEND 2341 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY (SEE LEGEND) DRIP TUBING START CONNECTION PVC SUPPLY HEADER HUNTER ECO INDICATOR DRIP TUBING, PER LEGEND, NOT TO EXCEED 200 LINEAR FEET BETWEEN HEADERS AIR RELIEF VALVE, PER LEGEND, INSTALL AT HIGHEST POINT ON ZONE AREA PERIMETER PERIMETER LATERALS 2" TO 4" FROM EDGE FLUSH VALVE, PER LEGEND, PLUMB TO EXHAUST HEADER PVC EXHAUST HEADER NOTE: - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. 5678910 FF AR I I 123456784991010 N DRIP LAYOUT - MULTIPLE BEDS DETAIL LEGEND 2341 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY (SEE LEGEND) DRIP TUBING START CONNECTION PVC SUPPLY HEADER HUNTER ECO INDICATOR DRIP TUBING, PER LEGEND, NOT TO EXCEED 200 LINEAR FEET BETWEEN HEADERS AIR RELIEF VALVE, PER LEGEND, INSTALL AT HIGHEST POINT ON ZONE AREA PERIMETER PERIMETER LATERALS 2" TO 4" FROM EDGE FLUSH VALVE, PER LEGEND, PLUMB TO EXHAUST HEADER NOTE: - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. FFFAR III 1234495 56789 678 L DRIP LAYOUT - ODD CURVES DETAIL LEGEND 2341 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY (SEE LEGEND) DRIP TUBING START CONNECTION PVC SUPPLY HEADER HUNTER ECO INDICATOR DRIP TUBING, PER LEGEND, NOT TO EXCEED 200 LINEAR FEET BETWEEN HEADERS AIR RELIEF VALVE, PER LEGEND, INSTALL AT HIGHEST POINT ON ZONE AREA PERIMETER PERIMETER LATERALS 2" TO 4" FROM EDGE FLUSH VALVE, PER LEGEND, PLUMB TO EXHAUST HEADER PVC EXHAUST HEADER BLANK TUBING HEADER CENTERED ON MOUND OR BERM NOTE: - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. 56789 F AR I I 1234 5 6 7 8 4 10 10 11 11 9 M DRIP LAYOUT - END FEED DETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY (SEE LEGEND) HUNTER ECO INDICATOR PVC SUPPLY HEADER DRIP TUBING START CONNECTION DRIP TUBING, PER LEGEND, NOT TO EXCEED 200 LINEAR FEET BETWEEN HEADERS AIR RELIEF VALVE, PER LEGEND, INSTALL AT HIGHEST POINT ON ZONE AREA PERIMETER PERIMETER LATERALS 2" TO 4" FROM EDGE PVC EXHAUST HEADER FLUSH VALVE, PER LEGEND, PLUMB TO EXHAUST HEADER F NOTE: - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. AR I I 23456789210 5678910 K DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY WITH BASKET STRAINER DETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS PRESSURE REGULATOR, SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS. BASKET STRAINER, SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS. PLASTIC RECTANGULAR 'JUMBO' VALVE BOX(S) WITH BOLT DOWN COVER, USE STAINLESS BOLT, NUT, AND WASHER. BOX TO BE PLACED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "RCV" AND CONTROL STATION # ONTO LID. REMOTE CONTROL VALVE, SEE LEGEND FOR SPECS. 24" WIRE LOOP WITH DRI-SPLICE CONNECTORS (1 OF 2) VALVE ID TAG FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS SCH. 80 PVC TxT ELL SCH 80 PVC NIPPLES LENGTH AS REQ., (1 OF 2) (4) BRICK SUPPORTS IRRIGATION MAINLINE OR MANIFOLD SUPPLY 3 4" ROCK, 2 CUBIC FEET LANDSCAPE FABRIC 3" TO DRIP SYSTEM NOTES: - INSTALL VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE PROPER VALVE INSTALLATION AT MAIN LINE DEPTH. - ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS TO HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE. 2 3 4 5 6 56 7 8 78 910 910 11 1112 14 13 12 1314 O TREE ROOT ZONE WATERING SYSTEM DETAIL LEGEND 234 1 1 FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS GRATED CAP FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS HUNTER 0.25 or 0.50 GPM PCB BUBBLER HUNTER HCV CHECK VALVE (OPTIONAL) 3 4" GRAVEL PATENTED STRATA ROOT SYSTEM HUNTER SWING JOINT MODEL #SJ-5XX-X LATERAL PIPE PVC SCH 40 TEE OR EL ROOT INTRUSION BARRIER HUNTER FILTER FABRIC SLEEVE #RZWS SLEEVE 2 3 4 5 56 6 7 7 8 8 910 910 1112 1112 P FINISHED GRADE IN TURF HUNTER ECO INDICATOR - ECOID 1/2" FPT CONNECTION FROM LATERAL LATERAL PIPE PER PLAN SWING JOINT - SJ 5XX FINISHED GRADE IN PLANTER BED ADJACENT MULCH, DEPTH PER PLAN ECO INDICATOR Q Page 324 of 2604

X X X X
BROA

JERICHO RD T T M M M M M MW MW
BF
BF
BF
BF BF
3  3  3  3  3  3  3  3  ))  ))  ))  ))  )) 
))  ))  )) 
)) 
3  %/'* )) 
3  %/'* %/'*
%/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  )) 
 3 
 ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  BENCH BENCH BENCH X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RH RH RH RH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMRHRH RHRH RHRH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMLM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FENCING LEGEND X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 42" TUBULAR STEEL FENCING 42" CABLE RAIL FENCING 42" VINYL FENCING RETAINING WALL 2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1  /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 )(1&( W$//3/$1 3'-6" CABLE GUARDRAIL ATOP RETAINING WALL
VARIES
3'-6" GALVANIZED STEEL ROUND END POST WITH CABLE ENDER GALVANIZED STEEL SQUARE POST WITH CABLE HOLDERS GALVANIZED STEEL CABLE TENSIONER ADJUSTABLE GALVANIZED STEEL CABLE WIRE ROPE RETAINING WALL PER CIVIL ENGINEER COMBO RETAINING WALL / T.S. FENCE DECORATIVE MASONRY WALL 3'-6" TUBE STEEL FENCING
3'-6" TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TUBULAR STEEL FENCE POST TUBULAR STEEL FENCE PICKET TUBULAR STEEL TOP RAIL TUBULAR STEEL BOTTOM RAIL CONCRETE FOOTING COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTE: FINISH AND COLOR T.B.D. VINYL FENCING FINISHED GRADE A.C. CONDENSER 3' -6" ADJACENT BUILDING A.C. CONDENSER SCREEN FENCING AND PLANTING FINISHED NOTE: FINISH AND COLOR T.B.D. GRADE 18" - 24" WHERE APPLICABLE A B C D Page 325 of 2604 X X X

BROADMOOR DR JERICHO RD T T M M M M M MW MW
BF
BF
BF
BF BF
3  3  3  3  3  3  3  3  ))  ))  ))  ))  )) 
))  ))  )) 
)) 
3  %/'* )) 
3  %/'* %/'*
%/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  )) 
 3 
 ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  BENCH BENCH BENCH X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RH RH RH RH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMRHRH RHRH RHRH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMLM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 POLE LIGHT BOLLARD LIGHT COACH LIGHT TREE LIGHT CONCEPT LIGHTING LEGEND 2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1  LIGHTING NOTES: ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE PERMANENT FIXTURES THAT ARE UL TESTED AND APPROVED. THE DESIGN OF THE LIGHTING SHALL BE DONE SO THAT MAIN ENTRANCES, FOCAL POINTS AND GATHERING AREAS ARE ILLUMINATED TO ENHANCE EACH SPACE. FIXTURES LOCATED ON THE BUILDINGS AND WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE ARE INTENDED TO ILLUMINATE EMERGENCY EGRESS PATHWAYS TO MEET ALL LOCATE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS. LIGHT POLLUTION IS A MAJOR CONCERN AND APPROPRIATE WATTAGES AND ACCESSORIES SUCH AS CUT-OFF SHIELDS WILL BE UTILIZED TO MINIMIZE LIGHT TRESPASS INTO UNWANTED AREAS. ALL LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF LA MESA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE GUIDELINES. BBQ LIGHTS POLE MOUNTED SITE LIGHT SIGNAGE LIGHT POLE MOUNTED SITE LIGHT C:\Users\ccrum\Desktop\8283-A61-03.jpg BUILDING COACH LIGHT TREE UPLIGHT /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 /,*+7,1*3/$1 -(5,&+2 Page 326 of 2604 X X X

BROADMOOR D

JERICHO RD T T M M M M M MW MW
BF
BF
BF
BF BF
3  3  3  3  3  3  3  3  ))  ))  ))  ))  )) 
))  ))  )) 
)) 
3  %/'* )) 
3  %/'* %/'*
%/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* %/'* ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  )) 
 3 
 ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  ))  3  BENCH BENCH BENCH X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RH RH RH RH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMRHRH RHRH RHRH LM LM LM LMLM LMLM LMLM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2) 35(3$5('%<
6+((7 &,7<2)/$M(6$&$/,)251,$ -(5,&+2 /$1'6&$3(&21&(373/$1 /$1'6&$3(&21&(37 (;,67,1*75((6 DENOTES EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 33 TOTAL EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED Page 327 of 2604

PROJECT

BOUNDARY
B
R
OA
D
M
O
O
R
D
R
A
MA
YA
D
R

LAKEVIEW DR

BROADMOOR PL

PROJECT

BOUNDARY
PVT. DRIVE "B"
P
VT. D
R
I
VE
"
E
"
T
T
M
M
M
M
M
PVT. DRIVE "D"

JERICHO RD
BF
BF
BF
BF
BF
PVT PVT. DRIVE "C"
. DRIVE "C"
BLDG #2
BLDG #3
BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6
B
L
D
G
#
7 BLDG #1
P=652.2
P=651.3
P=651.3 P=649.0
P
=646.3
P=652.2 P=651.2
P=651.7
P=650.3
P=650.3
P=648.0 P=646.4
P
=64

5.3 BLDG #9
P=652.6
BLDG #8
P=652.1
P=651.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.8
FF=652.3 P=652.6
FF=653.3
FF=652.9
FF=651.9
FF=652.4
FF=652.9
FF=652.0 FF=651.0
FF=64

7.0 FF=646.0
FF=652.0 FF=651.0 FF=649.7
FF=648.7
FF=647.1
P
=64

4.8 FF=64

5.5 PVT. DRIVE "A"
1 OF
SHEET
PREPARED BY:

HUNSAKER
& ASSOCIATES

CITY OF LA MESA, CALIFORNIA

FIRE TRUCK TURNING EXHIBIT

JERICHO ROAD
1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT

PROPOSED WATER LINE
PATH

FRONT TIRES

VEHICLE BODY

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
105' PIERCE LADDER TRUCK
LEGEND