and confirmation of the required items by City staff within a reasonable period of time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. The Final Parcel Map 37891 is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required item(s) on or before October 20, 2022.
SECTION 2. The City Council’s approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms to the tentative parcel map, the Subdivision Map Act, and all ordinances of the City.
SECTION 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirement and any other requirements not expressly described here to the City Engineer’s satisfaction:
A. Submit performance and labor & materials securities for Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map.
SECTION 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on October 20, 2022. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Subdivision Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 20th day of September 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
158 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Resolution No. 2022-XXX
Conditional Approval of Parcel Map No. 37891
Adopted: September 20, 2022
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_______________________
LINDA EVANS, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
________________________
MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(CITY SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
159 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
160 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
V I C I N I T Y M A P
127726&$/(
PARCEL MAP NO. 37891
:(67:$5'+2'5
ATTACHMENT 1
161 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
162 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
ATTACHMENT 2
163
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
164
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
165
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
166 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
1 of 9
CITY OF LA QUINTA
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
PARCEL MAP NO. 37891
OFF-SITE AND ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this ____________________________________ day of ___________________________, 20 ___________, by and between Global Development and Building, LLC, a California limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City."
RECITALS:
A. Developer has prepared and submitted to City for final approval and recordation a final map or Parcel map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Parcel Map No. 37891 (the "Tract") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). The Subdivision Map Act and City ordinances and regulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps are sometimes collectively referred to in this Agreement as the “Subdivision Laws.” B. A tentative map of the Tract has been approved subject to the Subdivision Laws and to the requirements and conditions contained in City Council Resolution No. 2021-002 (the “Resolution of Approval”). The Resolution of Approval is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is incorporated into this Agreement by reference.
C. Prior to approval of the Map, Developer is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements").
D. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time.
E. It is therefore necessary that Developer and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. In consideration of approval of a final map for the Tract by the City Council, Developer desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby Developer promises to install and complete, at Developer’s own expense, all the public improvement work required by City in connection with the proposed Tract. Developer has secured this Agreement by improvement security required by the Subdivision Laws and approved by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Developer shall furnish complete original improvement plans for the construction, installation and completion of the Improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. The Improvement Plans for the Tract shall be maintained on file in the office of the City Engineer and shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. All references in this Agreement to the Improvement Plans shall include reference to any specifications for the Improvements as approved by the City Engineer.
2. Improvements. Developer shall construct the Improvements required to be constructed on the Improvement Plans or agreed to be constructed under the Resolution of Approval and this Agreement as more specifically described in Exhibit "A." attached hereto and expressly made a part hereof by this reference, and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
3. Improvement Security. Developer shall at all times guarantee Developer’s performance of this Agreement by furnishing to City, and maintaining, good and sufficient security as required by the Subdivision Laws on forms and in the amounts approved by City for the purposes as follows:
A. One class of security to be provided by Developer, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Developer’s fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others (“Participatory Improvements”), and payment of plan check and permit 167 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
2 of 9
fees. The performance security shall also include good and sufficient security in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of setting subdivision monuments as stated hereafter in this Agreement (“Monumentation Security”). A second class of security to be provided by Developer, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Developer, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Developer shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition precedent to City Council approval of the Map.
Developer shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured.
B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and may be one or more of the following:
1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version).
3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office).
4) Irrevocable letters of credit, in a form acceptable to and approved by the City Attorney, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or Tract map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Developer's expense through an appraisal approved by City.
6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least twenty percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements.
168 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
3 of 9
7) When Developer is a non-profit organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company.
C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. The securities required by this Agreement shall be kept on file with the City Clerk. The terms of the security documents specified in this Agreement are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. If any security is replaced by another approved security, the replacement shall be filed with the City Clerk and, upon filing, shall be deemed to have been made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with the City Clerk, the former security may be released. The City Engineer shall approve replacement of security.
D. At the time of submittal of security, Developer shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, Tract map or waiver of Tract map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows:
1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00).
2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Developer shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee.
E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Developer, or until Developer pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Developer of Developer's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements.
Upon written demand from City, Developer shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Developer fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Developer's Surety for payment of said cash and Developer's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security.
F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement.
169 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
4 of 9
G. Security shall be released in the following manner:
1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of Section 10 of this Agreement.
2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Developer. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%).
The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement.
3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Developer of Developer's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply.
5) No security given for the guarantee or warranty of work shall be released until the expiration of the warranty period and until any claims filed during the warranty period have been settled.
As provided in paragraph 13 of this Agreement, the warranty period shall not commence until final acceptance of all the work and improvements by the City pursuant to Paragraph 10.
Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Developer has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 6) City may retain from any security released an amount sufficient to cover costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.
4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Developer shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits.
5. Off-site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Developer or City, Developer shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Developer is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Developer may request in writing that City attempt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Developer. If City so agrees, City and Developer shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Developer advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Developer. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Developer to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Developer. In no event shall the failure of Developer or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Developer's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval.
6. Completion of Improvements; Inspection.
6.1 Construction of Improvements. Developer shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Developer to begin or complete construction of 170 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
5 of 9
the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Developer in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Developer's obligations hereunder.
6.2 Inspection. Developer shall at all times maintain proper facilities and safe access for inspection of the public improvements by City and to the shops wherein any work is in preparation. Upon completion of the work, the Developer may request a final inspection by the City Engineer or the City Engineer’s authorized representative. If the City Engineer or the designated representative determines that the work has been completed in accordance with this Agreement, then the City Engineer shall certify the completion of the public improvements to the City Council. No improvements shall be finally accepted unless all aspects of the work have been inspected and determined to have been completed in accordance with the Improvement Plans and City standards and accepted by the City as described in Paragraph 10 of this Agreement. Developer shall bear all costs of plan check, inspection and certification.
7. Force Majeure. In the event that Developer is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Developer's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events.
8. Time Extension. Developer may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
As a condition of the time extension, Developer shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements.
9. Survey Monuments. Before final approval of street improvements, Developer shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Developer shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie-outs for monuments set in public streets.
10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Developer shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Developer's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted.
Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly-authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions set forth in the Resolution of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Developer has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 12, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council.
11. Injury to Improvements. Until such time as the Improvements are accepted by City in accordance with Paragraph 10, Developer shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the improvements constructed or installed. Until such time as all Improvements required by this Agreement are fully completed and accepted by City, Developer will be responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any damage to such improvements. City shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the work or improvements specified in this Agreement prior to the 171 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
6 of 9
completion and acceptance of the work or improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby assumed by Developer.
12. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Developer shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As-Built," "As-Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer.
13. Improvement Warranty. Developer hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. If within the warranty period any work or improvement or part of any work or improvement done, furnished, installed, constructed or caused to be done, furnished, installed or constructed by Developer fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this Agreement or the improvement plans and specifications referred to herein, Developer shall without delay and without any cost to City, repair or replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or structure. Should Developer fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, Developer hereby authorizes City, at City’s sole option, to perform the work twenty (20) days after mailing written notice of default to Developer and to Developer’s Surety, and agrees to pay the cost of such work by City. Should City determine that an urgency requires repairs or replacements to be made before Developer can be notified, City may, in its sole discretion, make the necessary repairs or replacement or perform the necessary work and Developer shall pay to City the cost of such repairs
14. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Developer to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released.
15. City Right to Cure. If Developer fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed, or commenced and diligently pursued, within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, and Developer shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect.
16. Injury to Public Improvements, Public Property or Public Utility Facilities. Developer shall replace or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the case may be, all public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which are destroyed or damaged as a result of any work performed under this Agreement. Developer shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all public or public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this Agreement, whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by City or any public or private utility corporation or by any combination of such owners. Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer.
17. Indemnification.
a. Neither City nor any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) shall be liable for any injury to persons or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissions of Developer, its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement. Developer further agrees to protect and hold harmless Indemnified Parties form any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liability or loss of any sort, including, but not limited to, attorney fees and litigation expenses, because of, or arising out of, acts or omissions of Developer, its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement, including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of, in whole or in part, the design of construction of the Improvements. This indemnification and agreement to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages or taking of property resulting from the design or construction of said subdivision, and the public improvements as 172 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
7 of 9
provided herein, and in addition, to adjacent property owners as a consequence of the diversion of waters from the design or construction of public drainage systems, streets and other public improvements.
b. Acceptance by City of the Improvements shall not constitute an assumption by City of any responsibility for any damage or taking covered by this paragraph. City shall not be responsible for the design or construction of the subdivision or the improvements pursuant to the approved Improvement Plans or map, regardless of any negligent action or inaction taken by City in approving the plans or map, unless the particular improvement design was specifically required by City over written objection by Developer submitted to the City Engineer before approval of the particular improvement design, which objection indicated that the particular improvement design was dangerous or defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design. Except as may be provided above, City shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or construction. Nothing contained in this paragraph is intended to or shall be deemed to limit or waive any protections or immunities afforded by law to City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”), by virtue of city’s approval of the plan or design of the Improvements, including without limitation the protections and immunities afforded by Government Code Section 830.6. After acceptance of the improvements, Developer shall remain obligated to eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or construction defect; however, Developer shall not be responsible for routine maintenance. Provisions of this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten (10) years following the acceptance by City of the Improvements. It is the intent of this paragraph that Developer shall be responsible for all liability for design and construction of the Improvements installed or work done pursuant to this Agreement and that city shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving, reviewing or inspecting any work or construction. The Improvement Security shall not be required to cover the provisions of this paragraph.
18. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control.
19. Severability. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect.
20. Developer No Agent of City. Neither Developer nor any of Developer’s agents, employees, or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of City in connection with the performance of Developer’s obligations under this Agreement.
21. General Provisions.
A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery.
Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph.
B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto.
C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement.
D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California.
173 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
174 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
9 of 9
Exhibit A
SECURITY – PARCEL MAP NO. 37891
OFF-SITE AND ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements designated as "deferred" will be constructed at a later date as determined by City.
Security for Deferred Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City.
Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act.
As elements of the work are completed, Developer may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the Tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer.
Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer.
Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required Tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council.
Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials
Grading $ 62,780 -
Off-Site Entry Improvements $ 42,728
Off-Site Landscaping $ 27,500 -
Off-Site Water and Sewer $ 184,050
Monumentation $ 5,000 -
Totals $ 322,058 -
Standard 10% Contingency $ 32,206 -
Professional Fees, Design 10% $ 32,206 -
Professional Fees, Construction 10% $ 32,206 -
Bond Amount $ 418,676
175 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
176 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PURCHASE OF ASPHALT PATCHER FOR EFFICIENT
POTHOLE REPAIRS THROUGH SOURCEWELL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the purchase of one PB Loader Asphalt Patcher for efficient pothole repairs through Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing; and authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase agreement.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• In June 2022, Council approved the fiscal year 2022/23 budget which included the appropriation of $250,000 to purchase a new asphalt patcher.
• The PB Loader Asphalt patcher will increase efficiency with pothole repairs, as well as fill the gap in service in-between the pavement management program schedule.
• The asphalt patcher will provide a permanent repair solution and does not require a commercial driver’s license to operate.
• Sourcewell's analysts streamline the procurement process by developing requests for proposals for national competitive solicitations that meet or exceed local requirements (Attachment 1).
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are available in the Machinery and Equipment budget (Account No. 501- 0000-80100) for a total cost of $232,143.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The City utilizes cold mix asphalt in bags or in bulk to repair potholes citywide.
Over the course of a year, the same potholes may be repaired several times until the road is treated during the City’s annual pavement management CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9
177 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
program. The asphalt patcher will allow City crews to make permanent repairs eliminating multiple returns to the same pothole. This equipment is designed to hold three tons of asphalt and keep it hot all day (Attachment 2).
The lead time for a new asphalt patcher is 10-12 months due to supply chain issues.
ALTERNATIVES
Staff does not recommend an alternative action.
Prepared by: Tony Ulloa, Public Works Deputy Director
Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Sourcewell Quote
2. Asphalt Patcher Specifications
178 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
TERMS Net 30
FOB FRESNO
MFG PRODUCT ARO See Below
INSTALL AROT See Below
QUOTE DATE 9/2/2022
SOURCEWELL MEMBER ID# 18113
LA QUINTA, CITY OF
QTY PART NO. DESCRIPTION PRICE EXTENSION
PB LOADER CONTRACT NO. 080521-PBL SOURCEWELL CONTRACT - LISTED PRICES QUOTATION NO. 11516
EMULSION SYSTEM
PATCHER
1 51618-18 MODEL BC-1.8 ASPHALT PATCHER (1.5 CUBIC YARD CAPACITY) EQUIPPED WITH
RADIANT HEATER, THERMOSTATICALLY CONTROLLED LPG BURNER, HYDRAULIC TOP LIDS AND DOORS, KEVLAR CHAIN CONVEYOR, HAND TORCH, SHOVEL APRON, 25 GAL.
LPG TANK, INSTALLATION AND PAINT BLACK
$73,773.00 $73,773.00
1 45-CS PB MODEL 45-CS EMULSION SPRAY UNIT HEATED BY TRUCK COOLING SYSTEM, Y
STRAINER, FILL BASKET, POWERED BY TRUCK AIR SYSTEM, VALVES, EMULSION WAND WITH 25' HOSE, 15 GAL. AIR RECEIVER, 35 GAL. EMULSION, INSTALLATION AND
PAINT BLACK
$11,934.00 $11,934.00
EMULSION SYSTEM OPTIONS
1 5640-00 15 GALLON SOLVENT TANK (CS SYSTEMS ONLY) $1,476.00 $1,476.00
COMPACTION TOOLS
0 50640-00 COMPACTOR LIFT PLATFORM - HYDRAULIC $3,406.00 $3,406.00 0 130-08 8 GAL POLY WATER TANK W/ 10' HOSE & SPIGOT $404.00 $404.00
HOSE REELS
1 5438-00 HOSE REEL - 1/2" X 25' FOR EMULSION $569.00 $569.00 1 5437-00t HOSE REEL - 3/8" X 25' FOR TORCH $506.00 $506.00 1 5396-00 HOSE REEL - 3/4" X 50' FOR AIR HAMMER $1,114.00 $1,114.00
CHASSIS
2023 FORD F-550 STANDARD CAB 6.7L 330HP DIESEL ENGINE, TORQUESHIFT 10 $80,102.04 SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION W/ PTO PROVISON, 19,500 GVWR, POWER
GROUP, STEEL WHEELS, PAINTED WH
1 CHASSIS $80,102.04
WANDS
1 50560-00-1 SOLVENT WAND WITH 25FT HOSE - CS SYSTEM $1,055.00 $1,055.00
SPOIL BINS
1 MODS-57 SMALL SPOILS BIN 18" $2,566.00 $2,566.00
WORK PLATFORMS
1 MODS-61 12" WORK PLATFORM/CATWALK WITH HAND RAILS AND LADDERS $2,202.00 $2,202.00
CONTROLS
1 50635-00 CAB CONTROLS (TOP LIDS) AIR TOGGLE $700.00 $700.00
STORAGE
1 5999-00S LOCKABLE SIDE TOOL BASKET - SMALL $1,330.00 $1,330.00
HAMMER SYSTEMS
1 7700-00 VANAIR 160 CFM (100 PSI) UNDERDECK AIR COMPRESSOR $20,522.00 $20,522.00 1 7021-00 LOCKABLE HAMMER HANGER $353.00 $353.00
DISCHARGE SYSTEMS
1 50553-00 PIVOTAL ASPHALT CHUTE $1,296.00 $1,296.00
WARNING SYSTEMS
1 695-2MC STROBE - WHELEN MICRONS MCRNSA LED (SET OF TWO) $1,344.00 $1,344.00 STROBE - WHELEN 500V 5V1A LED (SET OF TWO) - TWO REAR DRIVER & PASSENGER $1,720.00
SIDE, TWO FRONT DRIVER & PASSENGER SIDE
2 695-51A $3,440.00
1 695-063 BEACON - WHELEN L31HAF LED - MOUNT CENTERED OVER CHASSIS $1,230.00 $1,230.00 1 MODS-38 ECCO K7000B BACKUP CAMERA SYSTEM (MONITOR + 1 CAM) $1,023.00 $1,023.00
MARKET RATE ITEMS
1 CUSTOM WHELEN VTX609A AMBER WARNING LIGHTS (SET OF TWO) $846.00 $846.00 1 5978-30 5-FT AIR BLOW WAND W/ BALL VALVE SHUT-OFF $619.00 $619.00 $210,345.04
$1,465.00
$1,800.00
$18,533.38
$232,143.42
$232,143.42
SOURCEWELL LISTED TOTAL:
MARKET RATE ITEMS TOTAL PRICE:
ESTIMATED FREIGHT TO CUSTOMER:
8.75% SALES TAX:
GRAND TOTAL:
GRAND TOTAL FOR 1 UNITS:
1. LEAD TIME FOR BODY PRODUCTION IS 120 DAYS, WITH AN ADDITIONAL 120-150 DAYS TO INSTALL AFTER RECIEPT OF CHASSIS AND BODY. LEAD TIME SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT TIME OF ORDER.
PB Loader Corporation
5778 W. Barstow * Fresno, California 93722-5024 * Telephone (559) 277-7370 * Fax (559) 277-7375 Toll Free 800-350-8521 * Web www.pbloader.com
ATTACHMENT 1
179 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
180 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
PB LOADER CORP. Page 1 of 5 V
UNIBELT PATCHER - SPECIFICATIONS
Model BC-1.8
These specifications describe a self-contained patch unit, which is permanently mounted to a truck chassis to be used for patching with hot asphalt.
Container:
Unit shall be 1.8 cubic yards
Double wall constructed
2” - 6 lb. density insulation throughout
3/16 GA HR steel interior sides, 10 GA HR steel exterior Top loading lids have expansion corrugations
Top loading doors are 2” double wall constructed
Single hinged top lids open into a V with inside surface acting as a funnel Flame cut upper pivot arms for top lids
All doors hydraulically operate by 2” x 11” stroke cylinders Material funneled to center of container
Hydraulic system shall operate at 1500 PSI
Hydraulic controls located at right rear corner of container Sloping floor shall not be less than 45° from horizontal Material shall be discharged by a belt over chain, 24” wide conveyor system Conveyor system shall include high temperature, heavy duty, multiply, 18" wide Kevlar® belt riveted onto every other crossbar by four rivets
Belting shall have WearGuard® coating and sealed ends for lacing Belt ends are spliced together with screw attached splicer bar Belt shall be reinforced and designed to withstand 800ºF and harsh cleaning solvents Chain shall have crossbars on every other chain link of conveyor and shall have sprockets with a 1¾” shaft
Conveyor is driven through a gearbox by a hydraulic motor Forward and reverse controls
3/8” Pintle chain shall be driven by a 25:1 right angle gearbox and hydraulic high torque motor Radiant Heater:
Heat tubes located under container
Interior heat chamber has passageways to direct heat
Passageways separate from heat chamber
Chamber totally enclosed inside container
Two propane fueled casted manifold burners with flume adjustment Rating of 38,000 BTU each @ pressure of 10 PSI
Controlled by thermostat range of 100°F - 300°F
12 volt electronic igniters
100% fuel shut off if burner is extinguished
Burner area fully enclosed and located at front of unit safely away from rear operation Hand Torch:
Pilot with valve control
Capacity of 200,000 BTU
25 foot hose supplied
Shoveling Apron: Model 5
Constructed of 10 GA HR steel
Folding bottom for material to bypass freely
Mounted on rear of container
ATTACHMENT 2
181 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
PB LOADER CORP. Page 2 of 5 V
OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT
Auxiliary Electric Heat Patcher:
Low density electric heat
Minimum 6KW, 240 VAC thermostatically controlled
100°F - 300°F
Weatherproof Panel
Overnight heating of asphalt
25 foot power cord
Compactor Lift Platform:
PB model 640
Constructed of 3/16” one piece formed plate with 2” lip on back and sides 1” pipe font pipe stop and two 2” channel rear stops, Reinforced with 3/16 HR angle on side corners Cylinder 1½” x 18" stroke, two 6” x 4” tube outside supports and 4” x 4” tube inside with internal rollers, located at rear unit
Hydraulic Tool Circuit:
25 foot dual hose
Quick couplers
Flow meter
Relief valve
Pressure gauge
Hydraulic Tools:
Stanley BR67 Breaker
Asphalt cutter
Detachable shank with pad
Tool Box:
Lockable, 14”W x18”L x 16”H
Additional sizes and configuration available
Tool Basket:
Expanded metal with Angle iron framed mounted on left side of unit 15”W x 48”L x 8”H
Spoils Bin:
18” frame spoils bin
Constructed of 10 GA HR steel door to discharge material Solvent Pump:
12 VDC pump and wand
Connected to solvent side of tank
25 foot hose with wand
Used for cleaning tools
Cab Controls:
Inside cab controls, air actuated
Operates top lids,
Air Blow Gun:
25 feet, 3/8” hose and wand
(Subject to air availability on chassis)
182 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
PB LOADER CORP. Page 3 of 5 V
Arrow Board:
Whelen TA85 (8) light board LED
Arrow - left, right, or both
Mounted at rear of unit
Hose Reels:
Emulsion spray hose reel
Hand torch hose reel
Solvent hose reel
Air blow gun hose reel
Dual hose reel for hydraulic jackhammer
All reels are designed to accommodate 25 foot hoses
Air hammer hose reel, 50 foot
LPG Tank:
25 gallon upright (portable)
Pivotal Asphalt Chute:
Chute to be mounted at rear with 180° - 110° pivot, depending on rear mount accessories Optional tilt adjustment available
Tool Holders:
Cone holders
Asphalt lute and shovel holders
Lockable hammer holder
Safety Equipment:
Fire extinguisher 10 lbs.
Triangle kit
5 gallon igloo with mounting bracket
LED taillights
Backup alarm
Above Frame Work Deck:
20” with safety grip decking with ladder and hand rails Custom sizes available
Compactor Plates:
MBW - AP2000H
Flashers LED:
Two Whelen Micron amber flasher mounted in grill
Two Whelen 500 series amber flasher mounted at rear
Work Lights
PSE LED work lights mounted at rear
GENERAL TRUCK SPECIFICATIONS - BC-1.8 ASPHALT PATCHER
Chassis:
Regular or Crew cab
GVW – 19,500 lbs.
Cab to axle – 60” to 84” depending on options
183 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
PB LOADER CORP. Page 4 of 5 V
Fuel tank:
Mid ship 28 gallon, Rear fuel tanks are not compatible
Transmission:
With PTO provisions
Switches:
Electric over electric PTO switch and light switches as required for provided safety lighting 184 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
PB LOADER CORP. Page 5 of 5 V
185 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
186 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PURCHASES OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
EQUIPMENT THROUGH CDWG, NEWEGG, AND DELL
RECOMMENDATION
Approve purchases of information technology equipment for fiscal year 2022/23 through CDWG, Newegg, and Dell.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• The City entered into a three-year contract service agreement with Acorn Technologies (Acorn) on July 2, 2019, with a two-year amendment approved July 1, 2022.
• The evaluation and recommendation of equipment purchases are within Acorn’s scope of services.
• Vendor approved contracts combined would not exceed $120,000 per year for the remainder of the contract term with Acorn. This provides flexibility to use any of these vendors depending on purchasing needs.
FISCAL IMPACT
Combined, these contracts would not exceed $120,000 annually, or a total of $240,000 during the two-year term. Funds are available in the Information Technology Fund and will be used to purchase machinery, computers, equipment, and other technical expenses.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Acorn was selected as the City’s Information technology (IT) contract services provider on July 2, 2019. The contract includes the ability for Acorn to seek products and services which meet the City’s needs. To fully exercise this provision of the contract, staff seeks the authority to appropriate $120,000 between three vendors (CDWG, Newegg, and Dell) for a total of $240,000 during the remaining two-year term. Vendors may be added or removed with Council approval.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 10
187 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Acorn conducts meetings with IT management, department heads, and City management to ensure current issues, projects, needs, and concerns are addressed. Based on the information gathered, Acorn will make recommendations with a budget and timeline to improve functionality and implement best practices. Subject to City approval, budget and scheduling, Acorn will solicit formal bids from three approved vendors and provide a final recommendation for staff’s approval.
The three vendors selected offer certified government discounts and provide quality products. Acorn shall seek the lowest priced product or service that best suits the City’s specific need. Sole source purchases shall be limited but may include ensuring a cohesive product among a business unit, restrictions, or requirements to have a certain product which operates with a current operating system or using a recognized brand.
Acorn shall follow all City Purchasing Policy requirements and obtain the full approval from the appropriate City staff before initiating a purchase with any vendor. Products shall not be marked up by Acorn and vendors shall invoice the City directly for products purchased. Equipment purchases include but are not limited to computers, servers, network switches, phones, routers, monitors, keyboards, storage devices, and other essential products to implement technological needs.
The contract authority would allow staff to utilize any of the approved vendors for the full “not to exceed” budget of $120,000 annually; invoices would be tracked to ensure that the annual budget for these services is not exceeded.
Staff requests this flexibility to select the appropriate vendor that can deliver specific, timely, cost-effective products as needed.
ALTERNATIVES
Council could elect not to approve the purchases of IT equipment through these vendors.
Prepared by: Reyna Camarena, Management Assistant
Approved by: Gilbert Villalpando, Director
188 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: COMMIT THE CITY TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT’S GO HUMAN SAFETY PLEDGE BY CREATING
STREETS THAT PROMOTE WALKING, BIKING, AND COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS
IN LA QUINTA
RECOMMENDATION
Commit La Quinta to the Southern California Association of Government’s Go Human Safety Pledge by creating streets that promote walking, biking, and community connections; and authorize staff to sign the pledge.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG) Go Human Safety Pledge invites jurisdictions to commit to designing and building safer streets that promote walking, biking, and community connections. • By signing the Pledge, jurisdictions, organizations, and individuals can become safety leaders in the SCAG region.
• Signatories receive access to SCAG resources, receive recognition for being a safety champion, and join SCAG’s growing safety cohort.
FISCAL IMPACT - None
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
SCAG’s Go Human Safety Pledge invites jurisdictions to commit to designing and building safer streets that promote walking, biking and community connections. By signing the Pledge, jurisdictions, organizations and individuals can become safety leaders in the SCAG region. Signatories can pledge to implement or sponsor a safety messaging campaign, deploy a temporary demonstration with the Go Human Kit of Parts, advocate for safety improvements using the High Injury Network, and much more.
At the center of SCAG’s Go Human is a regional safety advertisement campaign, which encourages drivers to slow down and watch for people walking CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 11
189 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
and biking. Based on data from SCAG, people who walk and bike experience a disproportionate share of serious injuries and fatalities in traffic crashes. The safety campaign focuses on driver speeds, one of the systemic factors that contribute to roadway danger.
The campaign is driven by local partners, including local agencies, non-profits, and community-based organizations, who work with SCAG to extend the reach of the campaign. SCAG co-brands its Go Human safety advertisements with partner logos and provides them at no cost. Local jurisdictions can request print or digital material. By signing the pledge, La Quinta will have access to these materials to promote traffic safety in the community.
ALTERNATIVES
Council could elect to deny this request.
Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst
Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer 190 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: ACCEPT SILVERROCK WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2014-13, LOCATED BETWEEN AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET
RECOMMENDATION
Accept the SilverRock Way Street Improvements Project as complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release remaining retention in the amount of $6,376, after the Notice of Completion is recorded.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• The SilverRock Way Street Improvements project included; construction of a 5,800-foot-long 30-foot-wide road, completion of the roadway over the box culvert canal crossing constructed by the Coachella Valley Water District, and construction of sewer and water lines (Attachment 1). • The work is complete and Council acceptance will close the contract and allow final payment.
FISCAL IMPACT
The following is the financial accounting for Project No. 2014-13. The City will receive $100,000 in reimbursable deposit from Bureau of Reclamation and $19,200 reimbursement from NV5:
Original Contract Amount $ 3,994,466
Change Order No. 1 - 7 $ 553,567
Final Contract Amount $ 4,548,033
Project Budget $ 7,860,041
Final Contract Amount ($ 4,548,033)
Design & Professional Costs ($ 641,274)
Inspection, Survey, Plans, & Other Construction Costs ($2,600,995) Anticipated Funds Remaining* $69,739
* All costs to date have been accounted for and no further costs are anticipated.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 12
191 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
There are adequate funds to close this project; the final retention amount of $6,376 will be paid from account number 401-0000-20600.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On February 4, 2020, Council awarded a $3,994,466 contract to Jones Bros Construction Company.
On July 7, 2020, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a 160-working day completion time starting on July 13, 2020, and ending on March 5, 2021. The project was deemed substantially complete on May 24, 2022. No liquidated damages or early completion incentives are recommended. Difference in dates is due to material delay to complete sewer force main line work.
Contract Change Order No. 1 allows for miscellaneous repairs and additions; also extending the contract completion date to April 6, 2021.
Contract Change Orders No. 2 and 3 allows for the construction of retention basins.
Contract Change Order No. 4 allows for utility sleeves and landscape irrigation sleeves, as well as some CVWD irrigation modifications.
Contract Change Order No. 5 allows for miscellaneous repairs and additions; also extending the contract completion date to June 9, 2021.
Contract Change Order No. 6 allows for quantity adjustments.
Contract Change Order No. 7 allows for reconfiguration of the CVWD sewer force main with a new connection.
The project construction effort is complete and in compliance with the plans and specifications. Staff recommends acceptance and release of the retention after the Notice of Completion is recorded.
ALTERNATIVES
Staff does not recommend an alternative.
Prepared by: Carley Escarrega, Management Assistant
Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map
192 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Vicinity Map
SilverRock Way Street Improvements
(Project No. 2014-13)
ATTACHMENT 1
193 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
194 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH
URBAN HABITAT FOR THE LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION TOPAZ PROJECT NO. 2016-03F FOR ADDITIONAL MISCELLANEOUS WORK REQUESTS
AND RELATED PROJECT BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract with Urban Habitat for the La Quinta Landscape Renovation Topaz Project No. 2016-03F for additional miscellaneous work requests, approve the project budget; and authorize the City Manager to execute this change order and any future change orders within the approved project budget.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• On, May 3, 2022, a contract was awarded to Urban Habitat (Contractor) for the construction of the La Quinta Landscape Renovation Topaz Project (Project) (Attachment 1) and construction began in June 2022. • Change Order No. 1 (Attachment 2) includes improvements for increased square footage of wall painting and patching; demolition and installation of two curb ramps; removal and installation of three trees; installation of an upgraded irrigation controller; and quantity adjustments for the sidewalk and keystone block per site conditions in the field; in the amount of $52,187.
FISCAL IMPACT
There are sufficient funds in the project budget (Account No. 401-0000- 60188, Project No. 2016-03F) for the improvements. The following table shows the project budget:
Total Budget
(All Phases)
Phase 6 –
Topaz
Professional: $ 547,258 $ 20,000
Design: $ 699,212 $ 86,692
Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 677,242 $ 115,000
Construction: $ 6,970,407 $ 701,038
Contingency: $ 1,069,029 $ 67,270
Total Budget: $ 9,963,148 $ 990,000
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 13
195
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
The following is the revised contract amount after this change order:
Total
Contract
Original Contract Amount: $ 648,851
This Contract Change Order No. 1 $ 52,187
Final Contract Amount: $ 701,038
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Proposed Change Order No. 1 includes the following additional miscellaneous items:
• Additional square footage of wall painting and patching; • Demolition and installation of two curb ramps;
• Removal and installation of three trees;
• Installation of an upgraded irrigation controller; and • Quantity adjustments for the sidewalk and keystone block wall per site conditions in the field
ALTERNATIVES
Staff does not recommend an alternative.
Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst
Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Project Vicinity Map
2. Change Order No. 1
196
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
*IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. © Riverside County GIS
Legend
Notes
REPORT PRINTED ON... 4/5/2019 11:12:16 AM
Project Vicinity Map
Topaz Landscape Renovation
0 1, 3,009
505
Feet
Blueline Streams
City Areas
World Street Map
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT1
1957
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
198
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
CONTRACT: La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement - Topaz PROJECT NO. 2016-03F
CONTRACTOR: Urban Habitat
PO Box 1177
La Quinta, CA 92247
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
********************************************************************** Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract.
**********************************************************************
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
This Contract Change Order allows for credit to wall painting (including patching) per bid Total ($ 9,384.50) This Contract Change Order allows for wall painting (including patching) updated Tota $18,314.16 This Contract Change Order allows for demo and installation of curb ramps (2) Total $26,747.48 This Contract Change Order allows for removal and installation trees (3) Total $1,901.66 This Contract Change Order allows for an upgrade to controller B Total $4,020.33 This Contract Change Order allows for quantity adjustments per site conditions in the field Total $10,587.69 $ 52,186.82
********************************************************************** By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: - 7 - days added to contract time.
The contract completion date shall be: 9/15/2022
********************************************************************** Submitted By: Date:
Approved By: Date:
********************************************************************** We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays.
Accepted By: Title:
Contractor: Date:
Original Contract Amount $ 648,850.54
Add This Change Order No. 1 $ 52,186.82
Revised Contract Total $ 701,037.36
ATTACHMENT 2
199
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Change Order Request
PROJECT: Topaz Project CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 2
DATE: 7/28/2022
PROJECT NUMBER: 22-18
TO CONTRACTOR: City of La Quinta CONTRACT DATE:
The Contract is changed as follows:
See below cost to add additional SF of Wall Painting (Including Patching) SF Cost
1) Wall Painting (Including Patching) Per Bid -6850 $ 1.37 $ (9,384.50) 2) Wall Painting (Including Patching) Updated 13368 $ 1.37 $ 18,314.16 $ 8,929.66
The original Contract Sum was $ 648,850.54
Net change by previously authorized Change orders $ -
The Contract Sum prior to this Change order was $ 648,850.54 The Contract Sum will be amended by this Change Order in the amount of $ 8,929.66 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 657,780.20 The Contract Time will be amended by
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Urban Habitat
SUBCONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR OWNER
PO Box 1177, La Quinta, CA 92247
Address Address Address
BY Estela Candelario BY BY
DATE 7/28/22 DATE DATE
Total Additional Cost
AIA Form G701
200 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Change Order Request
PROJECT: Topaz Project CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 2
DATE: 8/2/2022
PROJECT NUMBER: 22-18
TO CONTRACTOR: City of La Quinta CONTRACT DATE:
The Contract is changed as follows:
See below cost to remove and replace curb ramps at La Palma and Adams. 1) Demo and Install Curb Ramps $ 26,747.48
Total $ 26,747.48
Qualifications
1) Excludes hazardous materials handling, testing, and/or removal/abatement. 2) Work shall be performed during normal working hours -6:00 AM to 5:00 PM; Monday through Friday. 3) Parking onsite shall be provided for contractors and vendors. 4) Excludes repair, rework, and or maintenance of existing items, systems, and or finishes outside listed scope unless noted on plans. 5) Excludes moisture testing of new and or existing concrete and any flooring installation products to remediate excessive moisture. 6) Excludes salvage items for others other than GC/demolition contractor. 7) Excludes electrical/water consumption.
8) Excludes permits, engineering and design.
The original Contract Sum was $ 648,850.54
Net change by previously authorized Change orders $8,929.66 The Contract Sum prior to this Change order was $ 657,780.20 The Contract Sum will be amended by this Change Order in the amount of $ 26,747.48 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 684,527.68 The Contract Time will be amended by
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Urban Habitat
SUBCONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR OWNER
PO Box 1177, La Quinta, CA 92247
Address Address Address
BY Estela Candelario BY BY
DATE 8/2/22 DATE DATE
AIA Form G701
201 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
202
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
7/6/22
203
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
7/6/22
204
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Change Order Request
PROJECT: Topaz Project CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3
DATE: 8/8/2022
PROJECT NUMBER: 22-18
TO CONTRACTOR: City of La Quinta CONTRACT DATE:
The Contract is changed as follows:
See below cost to remove and replace trees as specified on the attachment provided by the City of 8/4. 1) See attached breakdown $ 1,901.66
The original Contract Sum was $ 648,850.54
Net change by previously authorized Change orders $ 35,677.14 The Contract Sum prior to this Change order was $ 684,527.68 The Contract Sum will be amended by this Change Order in the amount of $ 1,901.66 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 686,429.34 The Contract Time will be amended by
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Urban Habitat
SUBCONTRACTOR OWNER
PO Box 1177, La Quinta, CA 92247
Address Address
BY Estela Candelario BY
DATE 8/8/22 DATE
AIA Form G701
205
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Qty Units Description Cost Each Sub Total Subtotal Mark-Up Sub Total Bonding Price Total -
Labor 2 Unit Cost Trees - Replace Chilopsis linearis 'Lopur' for Lagerstroemia indica 'Turscarora'. $403.32 $806.64 $806.64 $0.00 $806.64 $0.00 $ 806.64 Labor 5 HR Labor - Demo 4 - 24" Box Trees $80.84 $404.20 $404.20 $80.84 $485.04 $7.28 $ 492.32 Labor 3 HR Labor - Misc. Irrigation for 4- 24" Box Trees $80.84 $242.52 $242.52 $48.50 $291.02 $4.37 $ 295.39 Misc. 1 EA Dump Fees $252.31 $252.31 $252.31 $50.46 $302.77 $4.54 $ 307.31 No Cost Difference for Tree Substitution at
Desert Stream Dr.
Total $ 1,901.66
Type
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Trees at Well Site and Trees of Concern to the Neighbor on Dune Palm PROJECT: Topaz
COR WORKSHEET
206
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
4/5/2022 207
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
4/5/2022 208
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
4/5/2022 209
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
4/5/2022 210
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Change Order Request
PROJECT: Topaz Project CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 4
DATE: 8/17/2022
PROJECT NUMBER: 22-18
TO CONTRACTOR: City of La Quinta CONTRACT DATE:
The Contract is changed as follows:
See below cost to upgrade controller B as requested by the City of La Quinta. 1) See attached breakdown $ 4,020.33
The original Contract Sum was $ 648,850.54
Net change by previously authorized Change orders $ 37,578.80 The Contract Sum prior to this Change order was $ 686,429.34 The Contract Sum will be amended by this Change Order in the amount of $ 4,020.33 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 690,449.67 The Contract Time will be amended by
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Urban Habitat
SUBCONTRACTOR OWNER
PO Box 1177, La Quinta, CA 92247
Address Address
BY Estela Candelario BY
DATE 8/17/22 DATE
AIA Form G701
211 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Qty Units Description Cost Each Sub Total Tax Subtotal Mark-Up Sub Total Bonding Price Total -
Labor 8 HR Labor $84.00 $672.00 $0.00 $672.00 $100.80 $772.80 $11.59 $ 784.39 Material 1 EA Misc. Material (Quote Attached) $2,549.22 $2,549.22 $223.06 $2,772.28 $415.84 $3,188.12 $47.82 $ 3,235.94 Total $ 4,020.33
Type
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Upgrade Controller #B PROJECT: Topaz
COR WORKSHEET
212
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Role Contact
Customer Contact Estela Candelario
Bid
Palm Desert CA #146
77868 Wildcat Dr
Palm Desert, CA 92211-1134
W: (760)360-2950
Bill To:
Urban Habitat (#1021795)
PO Box 1177
La Quinta, CA 92247-1177
W: (760)296-3603
Ship To:
Topaz (#1021795-3197)
Miles Ave and Dune Palms Rd
Quote: 5625522, EXP: 10/31/22 La Quinta, CA 92247
W: (760)296-3603
Created Quote# Due Date Expected Award Date Expiration Date 08/17/2022 5831543 09/17/2022 09/17/2022 09/17/2022
Printed Job Name Job Description Job Start Date
08/17/2022 15:14:46 09/17/2022
Line
#
Item # Item Desc Qty Unit
Price
Extended
Price
1 ESPLXME2P Rain Bird Traditionally Wired Next Gen Controller Indoor/Outdoor 12 Station Plastic Wall Mount Enclosure w/ Flow Smart Module
1 489.720 489.72
2 ESPLXMSM12 Rain Bird Expansion Module 12 Station for ESPLX Controller 3 151.351 454.05 3 RBSSTN9B Rain Brid IQ Spread Spectrum Frequency Hopping Radio 1 1,605.450 1,605.45 Total Price: $ 2,549.22
Quoted price is for material only. Applicable sales tax will be charged when invoiced. All product and pricing information is based on the latest information available and is subject to change without notice or obligation.
Local tax may differ based on locations and local codes. 213
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Project: 2016-03F Topaz Landscape Renovation
Dune Palms Rd & Miles Ave
La Quinta, California 92253
RFI #3: Controller #B
Status Open
To Estela Candelario (Urban Habitat) From Estela Candelario (Urban Habitat) PO Box 1177
La Quinta, California 92247
Date Initiated Aug 16, 2022 Due Date Aug 19, 2022
Location Dune palms and Miles Project Stage Course of Construction Cost Impact TBD Schedule Impact TBD
Spec Section 800-2 - Irrigation System Materials Cost Code Drawing Number Sheet 10 of 35 Sheets Reference Sheet 10 of 35 Sheets Linked Drawings
Received From Raul Ponce (Urban Habitat)
Copies To Daniel Candelario (Urban Habitat), Raul Ponce (Urban Habitat) Activity
Question Question from Estela Candelario Urban Habitat on Tuesday, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:08 AM PDT Please reference sheet 10 of 35 Sheets.
Per the plan notes, we must add several components to the controller to make it compatible with the Rain Bird IQ system.
After speaking with Rain Bird, they confirmed the current controller #B is not compatible with the IQ system and it must be changed to a ESP-LXME2P to make it compatible.
Please see below e-mail threat and confirm you would like a price to change the existing controller to a ESP-LXME2P.
Attachments
Photo 2.jpg, Photo 1.jpg, Memo Style.pdf
Awaiting an Official Response
214
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
1 Estela Candelario
From: Callison, Doug MAIL 2618 <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 8:56 AM
To: Reynoso, Jesus MAIL
Cc: Estela Candelario; Raul Ponce; Montroy, Derek MAIL 7426; Giddens, Dave MAIL 7427 Subject: Re: Topaz - Controller B
Attachments: image001.png; image002.png; image001.png; Photo 1.jpg; Photo 2.jpg; Topaz Plan Sheet.pdf
The controller in the picture is a ESP-SAT-LW Maxicom Link Satellite. Correct that it is not compatible with IQ. Correct that it would need to be changed to a ESP-LXME2P to be compatible with IQ.
Thanks!
---------------------------
Doug Callison
Rain Bird Corporation
[email protected]
(858) 705-3038
On Aug 16, 2022, at 7:10 AM, Reynoso, Jesus MAIL <[email protected]> wrote:
Good Morning Estela,
I’ve included Doug Callison in the email. The city of La Quinta is running on Rain Bird IQ and the only compatible traditional wired controller control is the ESP-LXME2P not the ESP-32MC (even with a new face plate).
Doug, is this correct?
From: Estela Candelario [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 11:04 AM
To: Reynoso, Jesus MAIL <[email protected]>
Cc: Raul Ponce <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Topaz - Controller B
Hi Jesus,
Sorry I didn’t get back to you sooner.
After talking to the City, it looks like the face of the controller was changed but they are pretty sure the existing controller is a ESP-32 MC (see attached).
Is this compatible with the components the City is requesting? I attached the legend plan sheet. This is controller B – POC #2.
Thank you,
Estela Candelario
215
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
2 Project Manager
P.O. Box 1177
La Quinta Ca 92247
760.498.4450
California #963744
From: Reynoso, Jesus MAIL <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 8:24 AM
To: Estela Candelario <[email protected]>
Cc: Raul Ponce <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Topaz - Controller B
I’ll call you to discuss…
From: Estela Candelario [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 7:04 AM
To: Reynoso, Jesus MAIL <[email protected]>
Cc: Raul Ponce <[email protected]>
Subject: Topaz - Controller B
Good morning Jesus,
The City would like to upgrade the ESP-32SAT to be compatible with the below components requested by the City at the Topaz project for controller B.
Besides the controller and the below components, is there anything else we need to include? Thank you,
Estela Candelario
Project Manager
P.O. Box 1177
La Quinta Ca 92247
760.498.4450
California #963744
216
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
217
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Change Order Request
PROJECT: Topaz Project CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 5
DATE: 9/14/2022
PROJECT NUMBER: 22-18
TO CONTRACTOR: City of La Quinta CONTRACT DATE:
The Contract is changed as follows:
See below cost for quantity adjustments per site conditions and as requested on the field. 1) See attached breakdown $ 10,587.69
The original Contract Sum was $ 648,850.54
Net change by previously authorized Change orders $ 41,599.13 The Contract Sum prior to this Change order was $ 690,449.67 The Contract Sum will be amended by this Change Order in the amount of $ 10,587.69 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 701,037.36 The Contract Time will be amended by
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Urban Habitat
SUBCONTRACTOR OWNER
PO Box 1177, La Quinta, CA 92247
Address Address
BY Estela Candelario BY
DATE 8/14/22 DATE
AIA Form G701
218
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Qty Units Description Cost Each Sub Total Price Total
-
Misc. 162 LF Keystone Concrete Retaining Block Wall (3 Course) $31.84 $5,158.08 $5,158.08 Misc. -163 LF Keystone Concrete Retaining Block Wall (4 Course) $38.34 -$6,249.42 -$6,249.42 Misc. 376.5 SF Remove and Replace 6' Sidewalk per City Standard 245 $31.02 $11,679.03 $11,679.03
$10,587.69
Type
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Adjusted Quantities per Site Conditions and Requested Changes PROJECT: Topaz
COR WORKSHEET
219
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
1 Estela Candelario
From: Estela Candelario
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 6:39 AM
To: Ubaldo Ayon; Lorissa Gruehl
Cc: Raul Ponce
Subject: Topaz - Remove and Replace Sidewalk Total SF
Good morning,
This e-mail is to confirm the total SF area of the sidewalk to remove and replace is 803.5. Any additional SF will be billed as a quantity adjustment on the billing.
Should you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me.
Thank you,
Estela Candelario
Project Manager
P.O. Box 1177
La Quinta Ca 92247
760.498.4450
California #963744
220 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH SHADE STRUCTURES, INC. DBA USA SHADE & FABRIC STRUCTURES, INC.
THROUGH SOURCEWELL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING FOR INSTALLATION OF A SHADE STRUCTURE AT MONTICELLO PARK, PROJECT NO. 2022-20
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Agreement for Contract Services for the installation of a shade structure at Monticello Park, Project No. 2022-20, with Shade Structures, Inc. dba USA Shade & Fabric Structures, Inc. through Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Monticello Park (Monticello) includes three play areas; the swing set area is in need of a shade structure.
• The City utilizes Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing (Sourcewell) for procurement of goods and services.
• Shade Structures, Inc. dba USA Shade & Fabric Structures, Inc. (USA Shade) submitted a quote for the installation of a shade structure over the swing set at Monticello for $62,209.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for the installation of a shade structure at Monticello is budgeted in the fiscal year 2022/23 Capital Expenses, Parks (Account No. 503-0000-71060)
SHADE STRUCTURE LOCATION COST
Monticello Park $ 62,209
Contingency Amount 20% $ 12,442
TOTAL: $74,651
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 14
221 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Monticello has three play areas, and shade structures were installed over the playgrounds for ages 2-5 and 5-12 in the 2021/22 FY. Currently there is no shade over the swing set area. A shade structure over the swing set would provide relief from the sun and make the swings more user friendly.
The City utilizes Sourcewell to streamline the procurement process. A quote from USA Shade was received through Sourcewell, which complies with the City’s purchasing policy. Based on USA Shade’s qualifications, staff recommends approval of the Agreement for Contract Services (Attachment 1).
USA Shade submitted a quote for the installation of the structure over the swing set at Monticello. The cost to add the structure including a 20% contingency would be $74,651
.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may direct staff to seek other alternatives or deny this request.
Prepared by: Dianne Hansen, Management Analyst
Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Agreement for Contract Services
222 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
ATTACHMENT 1
AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, (“City”), a California municipal corporation, and Shade Structures, Inc. dba USA SHADE & Fabric Structures, Inc. (“Contracting Party”). The parties hereto agree as follows:
1. SERVICES OF CONTRACTING PARTY.
1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall provide those services related to Project No. 2022-20 Monticello Park Shade Structure as specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Services”). Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party is a provider of first-class work and/or services and Contracting Party is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein and, in light of such status and experience, Contracting Party covenants that it shall follow industry standards in performing the Services required hereunder, and that all materials, if any, will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “industry standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar services under similar circumstances.
1.2 Compliance with Law. All Services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations, and laws of the City and any Federal, State, or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction.
1.3 Wage and Hour Compliance, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local wage and hour laws.
1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Contracting Party shall obtain such licenses, permits (permit fees waived), and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, including a City of La Quinta business license. Contracting Party and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, free and harmless against any such fees, 223 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-2-
assessments, taxes, penalties, or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against City hereunder. Contracting Party shall be responsible for all subcontractors’ compliance with this Section.
1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contracting Party warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the Services to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site where the Services are to be performed, if any, and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement.
Should Contracting Party discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the Services or as represented by City, Contracting Party shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contracting Party’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof).
1.6 Standard of Care. Contracting Party acknowledges and understands that the Services contracted for under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that, consistent with this understanding, Contracting Party’s work will be held to an industry standard of quality and workmanship. Consistent with Section 1.5 hereinabove, Contracting Party represents to City that it holds the necessary skills and abilities to satisfy the industry standard of quality as set forth in this Agreement. Contracting Party shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the Services performed by Contracting Party, and the equipment, materials, papers, and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. The performance of Services by Contracting Party shall not relieve Contracting Party from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Contracting Party.
1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services (“Additional Services”) only when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, provided that Contracting Party shall not be required to perform any Additional Services without compensation. Contracting Party shall not perform any Additional Services until receiving prior written authorization (in the form of a written change order if Contracting Party is a contractor performing the Services) from 224 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-3-
the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Contracting Party. It is expressly understood by Contracting Party that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to the Services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. It is specifically understood and agreed that oral requests and/or approvals of Additional Services shall be barred and are unenforceable. Failure of Contracting Party to secure the Contract Officer’s, or assigned designee’s written authorization for Additional Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment of the Contract Sum or time to perform this Agreement, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, or the like, for Additional Services provided without the appropriate authorization from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Compensation for properly authorized Additional Services shall be made in accordance with Section 2.3 of this Agreement.
1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in “Exhibit D” (the “Special Requirements”), which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern.
2. COMPENSATION.
2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with “Exhibit B” (the “Schedule of Compensation”) in a total amount of Sixty-Two Thousand, Two Hundred and Nine Dollars ($62,209). (the “Contract Sum”), except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party’s rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other reasonable methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contracting Party at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City; Contracting Party shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation.
Regardless of the method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of 225 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-4-
Compensation, Contracting Party’s overall compensation shall not exceed the Contract Sum, except as provided in Section 1.7 of this Agreement.
2.2 Method of Billing & Payment. Any month in which Contracting Party wishes to receive payment, Contracting Party shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City’s Finance Director, an invoice for Services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Contracting Party specifying that the payment requested is for Services performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon approval in writing by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, and subject to retention pursuant to Section 8.3, City will pay Contracting Party for all items stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than thirty (30) days after invoices are received by the City’s Finance Department.
2.3 Compensation for Additional Services. Additional Services approved in advance by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement shall be paid for in an amount agreed to in writing by both City and Contracting Party in advance of the Additional Services being rendered by Contracting Party. Any compensation for Additional Services amounting to five percent (5%) or less of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Any greater amount of compensation for Additional Services must be approved by the La Quinta City Council, the City Manager, or Department Director, depending upon City laws, regulations, rules and procedures concerning public contracting. Under no circumstances shall Contracting Party receive compensation for any Additional Services unless prior written approval for the Additional Services is obtained from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement.
3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE.
3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. If the Services not completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, as set forth in Section 3.2 and “Exhibit C”, it is understood that the City will suffer damage.
3.2 Schedule of Performance. All Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in “Exhibit C” (the “Schedule of Performance”). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer or assigned designee.
226 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-5-
3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Contracting Party, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Contracting Party shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the forced delay when and if in the Contract Officer’s judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer’s determination, or assigned designee, shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Extensions to time period in the Schedule of Performance which are determined by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to be justified pursuant to this Section shall not entitle the Contracting Party to additional compensation in excess of the Contract Sum.
3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions in Article 8.0 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on or around October 1, 2022, and terminate on completion and acceptance of installation prior to June 30, 2023.
4. COORDINATION OF WORK.
4.1 Representative of Contracting Party. The following principals of Contracting Party (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contracting Party authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
(a) Name: David Schneider
Tel No.
E-mail: [email protected]
(b) Name: Ashley Donde
Tel No. 714-427-6981
Email: [email protected]
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contracting Party and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the 227 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-6-
Services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be changed by Contracting Party and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City.
4.2 Contract Officer. The “Contract Officer”, otherwise known as Dianne Hansen, Management Analyst Parks/Landscape or assigned designee may be designated in writing by the City Manager of the City. It shall be Contracting Party’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Contracting Party shall refer any decisions, that must be made by City to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer or assigned designee. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.
4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Contracting Party, its principals, and its employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Contracting Party shall not contract or subcontract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contracting Party, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. Any attempted or purported assignment or contracting or subcontracting by Contracting Party without City’s express written approval shall be null, void, and of no effect. No approved transfer shall release Contracting Party of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.
4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Contracting Party, its agents, or its employees, perform the Services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision, or control of Contracting Party’s employees, servants, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their number or hours of service.
Contracting Party shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. 228 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-7-
Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contracting Party in its business or otherwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with Contracting Party. Contracting Party shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. Except for the Contract Sum paid to Contracting Party as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contracting Party for performing the Services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contracting Party for injury or sickness arising out of performing the Services hereunder. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Contracting Party and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. Contracting Party agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.
Contracting Party shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation laws regarding Contracting Party and Contracting Party’s employees. Contracting Party further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Contracting Party to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any payment due to Contracting Party under this Agreement any amount due to City from Contracting Party as a result of Contracting Party’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.
4.5 Identity of Persons Performing Work. Contracting Party represents that it employs or will employ at its own expense all personnel required for the satisfactory performance of any and all of the Services set forth herein.
Contracting Party represents that the Services required herein will be performed by Contracting Party or under its direct supervision, and that all personnel engaged in such work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized and permitted under applicable State and local law to perform such tasks and services.
229 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-8-
4.6 City Cooperation. City shall provide Contracting Party with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records, or other data or information pertinent to the Services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Contracting Party only from or through action by City.
5. INSURANCE.
5.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of any Services under this Agreement and throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, policies of insurance as set forth in “Exhibit E” (the “Insurance Requirements”) which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof.
5.2 Proof of Insurance. Contracting Party shall provide Certificate of Insurance to Agency along with all required endorsements. Certificate of Insurance and endorsements must be approved by Agency’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance.
6. INDEMNIFICATION.
6.1 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as set forth in “Exhibit F” (“Indemnification”) which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof.
7. RECORDS AND REPORTS.
7.1 Reports. Contracting Party shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, such reports concerning Contracting Party’s performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall require. Contracting Party hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contracting Party agrees that if Contracting Party becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein or, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Contracting Party shall promptly notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, of said fact, circumstance, technique, or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.
230 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-9-
7.2 Records. Contracting Party shall keep, and require any subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports (including but not limited to payroll reports), studies, or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and the Services performed hereunder (the “Books and Records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Books and Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have full and free access to such Books and Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such Books and Records. Such Books and Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Books and Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Contracting Party’s business, custody of the Books and Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contracting Party’s successor in interest. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement.
7.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents, and other materials plans, drawings, estimates, test data, survey results, models, renderings, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings, digital renderings, or data stored digitally, magnetically, or in any other medium prepared or caused to be prepared by Contracting Party, its employees, subcontractors, and agents in the performance of this Agreement (the “Documents and Materials”) shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and Contracting Party shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Documents and Materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Documents and Materials for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by Contracting Party will be at City’s sole risk and without liability to Contracting Party, and Contracting Party’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, revise, or assignment. 231 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-10-
Contracting Party may retain copies of such Documents and Materials for its own use. Contracting Party shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any Documents and Materials prepared by them, and in the event Contracting Party fails to secure such assignment, Contracting Party shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.
7.4 In the event City or any person, firm, or corporation authorized by City reuses said Documents and Materials without written verification or adaptation by Contracting Party for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said Documents and Materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Contracting Party from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect.
7.5 Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a nonexclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, rights of reproduction, and other intellectual property embodied in the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party shall require all subcontractors, if any, to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for the Documents and Materials the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party has the legal right to license any and all of the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party makes no such representation and warranty in regard to the Documents and Materials which were prepared by design professionals other than Contracting Party or provided to Contracting Party by City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Materials at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
7.6 Release of Documents. The Documents and Materials shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or as required by law. Contracting Party shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City.
7.7 Confidential or Personal Identifying Information. Contracting Party covenants that all City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussion notes, or other information, if any, developed or received by Contracting Party or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contracting Party to any person or entity without prior written authorization by City or unless required 232 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-11-
by law. City shall grant authorization for disclosure if required by any lawful administrative or legal proceeding, court order, or similar directive with the force of law. All City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussions, or other information shall be returned to City upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. Contracting Party’s covenant under this section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.
8. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT.
8.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contracting Party covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.
8.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety, or general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party’s right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City’s right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to this Article 8.0. During the period of time that Contracting Party is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during any period of default.
8.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Contracting Party sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Contracting Party in the performance of the Services required by this Agreement.
233 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-12-
8.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City’s consent or approval of any act by Contracting Party requiring City’s consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Contracting Party. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
8.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.
8.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.
8.7 Termination Prior To Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Contracting Party. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contracting Party shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Contracting Party shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, except amounts held as a retention pursuant to this Agreement.
8.8 Termination for Default of Contracting Party. If termination is due to the failure of Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall vacate any City-owned property which Contracting Party is permitted to occupy hereunder and City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 8.2, take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Contracting Party shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold 234 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-13-
any payments to Contracting Party for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City.
8.9 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees; provided, however, that the attorneys’ fees awarded pursuant to this Section shall not exceed the hourly rate paid by City for legal services multiplied by the reasonable number of hours spent by the prevailing party in the conduct of the litigation. Attorneys’ fees shall include attorneys’ fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery, and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.
9. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION.
9.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of City shall be personally liable to Contracting Party, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Contracting Party or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
9.2 Conflict of Interest. Contracting Party covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of it, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contracting Party’s performance of the Services under this Agreement. Contracting Party further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee.
Contracting Party agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.
No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association 235 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-14-
in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Contracting Party warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
9.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Contracting Party covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of any impermissible classification including, but not limited to, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry.
10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
10.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.
To City:
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Attention: Dianne Hansen
Management Analyst, Parks/Landscape
78495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
To Contracting Party:
USA SHADE and Fabric Structures. Inc.
Attention: Ashley Donde
Senior Regional Manager
1085 N. Main Street, Suite C
Oran, CA 92867
10.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
10.3 Section Headings and Subheadings. The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this Agreement. 236 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-15-
10.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument
10.5 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement including the exhibits hereto is the entire, complete, and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements, and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement.
10.6 Amendment. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Contracting Party and by the City Council of City. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
10.7 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
10.8 Unfair Business Practices Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contracting Party offers and agrees to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time City renders final payment to Contracting Party without further acknowledgment of the parties.
10.9 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. With the exception of the specific provisions set forth in this Agreement, there are no intended third-party beneficiaries under this Agreement and no such other third parties shall have any rights or obligations hereunder.
10.10Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver 237 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-16-
this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
238 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-17-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below.
CITY OF LA QUINTA,
a California Municipal Corporation
JON McMILLEN, City Manager
City of La Quinta, California
Dated:
CONTRACTING PARTY:
By:
Name: David Schneider
Title: Vice President___________
ATTEST:
MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk
La Quinta, California
By:
Name: Ashley Donde _____
Title: Regional Sales Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
239 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Scope of Services
1. Services to be Provided:
Installation of a shade structure one over the swing set at Monticello park located at the corner of Monticello and Fred Waring Drive.
240 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
241 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
242 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
243 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
244 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
245 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
246 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT
Re: Scope of Services
If the Scope of Services include construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance affecting real property or structures or improvements of any kind appurtenant to real property, the following apply:
1. Prevailing Wage Compliance. If Contracting Party is a contractor performing public works and maintenance projects, as described in this Section 1.3, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local laws. Contracting Party is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Sections 16000, et seq., (collectively, the “Prevailing Wage Laws”), and La Quinta Municipal Code Section 3.12.040, which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “Public works” and “Maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “Public works” or “Maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if construction work over twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) and/or alterations, demolition, repair or maintenance work over fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) is entered into or extended on or after January 1, 2015 by this Agreement, Contracting Party agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws including, but not limited to, requirements related to the maintenance of payroll records and the employment of apprentices. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1725.5, no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a “Public works” project unless registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) at the time the contract is awarded. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “Public works” or “Maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Contracting Party will maintain and will require all subcontractors to maintain valid and current DIR Public Works contractor registration during the term of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall notify City in writing immediately, and in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours, after receiving any information that Contracting Party’s or any of its subcontractor’s DIR registration status has been suspended, revoked, expired, or otherwise changed. It is understood that it is the responsibility of Contracting Party to determine the correct salary scale. Contracting Party shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at Contracting Party’s principal place of business and at the project site, if any. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced. Contracting Party must forfeit to City TWENTY247 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda Exhibit A
FIVE DOLLARS ($25.00) per day for each worker who works in excess of the minimum working hours when Contracting Party does not pay overtime. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1810 et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day. Contracting Party also shall comply with State law requirements to maintain payroll records and shall provide for certified records and inspection of records as required by California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., including Section 1776. In addition to the other indemnities provided under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall defend (with counsel selected by City), indemnify, and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with performance of the Services, including, without limitation, any and all “Public works” (as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws), Contracting Party shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law and/or the implementation of Labor Code Section 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, and/or any other similar law. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that it shall be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with such laws. Contracting Party shall require the same of all subcontractors.
2. Retention. Payments shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Article 2.0 of the Agreement. In accordance with said Sections, City shall pay Contracting Party a sum based upon ninety-five percent (95%) of the Contract Sum apportionment of the labor and materials incorporated into the Services under this Agreement during the month covered by said invoice. In the event there are any claims specifically excluded by Contracting Party from the operation of the release, City may retain proceeds (per Public Contract Code § 7107) of up to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the amount in dispute. City’s failure to deduct or withhold shall not affect Contracting Party’s obligations under the Agreement.
3. Utility Relocation. City is responsible for removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk-line utilities to the extent such utilities were not identified in the invitation for bids or specifications. City shall reimburse Contracting Party for any costs incurred in locating, repairing damage not caused by Contracting Party, and removing or relocating such unidentified utility facilities. Contracting Party shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay arising from the removal or relocation of such unidentified utility facilities.
4. Trenches or Excavations. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7104, in the event the work included in this Agreement requires excavations more than four (4) feet in depth, the following shall apply:
248 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
(a) Contracting Party shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify City, in writing, of any: (1) material that Contracting Party believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; (2) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site different from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids; or (3) unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Agreement.
(b) City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party’s cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a change order per Section 1.8 of the Agreement.
(c) in the event that a dispute arises between City and Contracting Party whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party’s cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, Contracting Party shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by this Agreement, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under this Agreement. Contracting Party shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting Parties.
5. Safety. Contracting Party shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out the Services, Contracting Party shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.
249 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit A
6. Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of the Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be liable for and shall pay to City the sum of One Thousand dollars ($1,000.00) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any of the Services required hereunder, as specified in the Schedule of Performance. In addition, liquidated damages may be assessed for failure to comply with the emergency call out requirements, if any, described in the Scope of Services. City may withhold from any moneys payable on account of the Services performed by Contracting Party any accrued liquidated damages.
250 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit C
Exhibit B
Schedule of Compensation
With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed Sixty-Two Thousand, Two Hundred and Nine Dollars ($62,209) (“Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in one lump sum on completion and acceptance of the work, attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement.
251 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
-2-
Exhibit C
Schedule of Performance
Contracting Party shall complete all services identified in the Scope of Services, Exhibit A of this Agreement, in accordance with the Project Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Work shall commence on an agreed upon date on or around October 20, 2021, and terminate on completion and acceptance of installation on or around June 30, 2022.
252 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit D
Exhibit D
Special Requirements
Contractor is responsible to pull required City permits (fees will be waived) and schedule required inspections.
Shade fabric colors are to be green and yellow to coordinate with the playground
Contractor is responsible to ensure all measurements are accurate. Contractor is responsible for mobilization, storage of materials, and any required pedestrian and/or traffic control.
253 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit E
Exhibit E
Insurance Requirements
E.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of this Agreement, the following policies shall be maintained and kept in full force and effect providing insurance with minimum limits as indicated below and issued by insurers with A.M. Best ratings of no less than A-VI:
Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001) $1,000,000 (per occurrence)
$2,000,000 (general aggregate)
Must include the following endorsements:
General Liability Additional Insured
General Liability Primary and Non-contributory
Commercial Auto Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001) $1,000,000 (per accident)
Personal Auto Declaration Page if applicable
Workers’ Compensation
(per statutory requirements)
Must include the following endorsements:
Workers Compensation with Waiver of Subrogation
Workers Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor if applicable Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, Commercial General Liability insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Contracting Party’s acts or omissions rising out of or related to Contracting Party’s performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party’s performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. An endorsement evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured (on the Commercial General Liability policy only) must be submitted concurrently with the execution of this Agreement and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder.
Contracting Party shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Contracting Party, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Contracting Party, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may 254 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit E
be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contracting Party’s performance under this Agreement. If Contracting Party or Contracting Party’s employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Contracting Party shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. The term “automobile” includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi-trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party’s performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss.
Contracting Party shall carry Workers’ Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker’s Compensation laws with employer’s liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease.
If coverage is maintained on a claims-made basis, Contracting Party shall maintain such coverage for an additional period of three (3) years following termination of the contract.
Contracting Party shall provide written notice to City within ten (10) working days if: (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; or (3) the deductible or self-insured retention is increased. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, Contracting Party shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Exhibit to the Contract Officer. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Contracting Party’s obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents.
E.2 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Contracting Party fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option:
a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Contracting Party to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contracting Party hereunder until Contracting Party demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof.
c. Terminate this Agreement.
255 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit E
Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Contracting Party’s failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contracting Party may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contracting Party’s or its subcontractors’ performance of work under this Agreement.
E.3 General Conditions Pertaining to Provisions of Insurance Coverage by Contracting Party. Contracting Party and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Contracting Party:
1. Contracting Party agrees to have its insurer endorse the thirdparty general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition prior to 1992. Contracting Party also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise.
2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Contracting Party, or Contracting Party’s employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contracting Party agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise.
3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contracting Party and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage.
4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.
5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called “third party action over” claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor.
6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises.
Contracting Party shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. 256 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit E
elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City’s protection without City’s prior written consent.
7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Contracting Party’s general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Contracting Party or deducted from sums due Contracting Party, at City option.
8. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Contracting Party or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City.
9. Contracting Party agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project that is brought onto or involved in the project by Contracting Party, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Contracting Party. Contracting Party agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section.
Contracting Party agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.
10. Contracting Party agrees not to self-insure or to use any selfinsured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein (with the exception of professional liability coverage, if required) and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self-insure its obligations to City. If Contracting Party’s existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Contracting Party, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions.
11. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving 257 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit E
the Contracting Party ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change.
If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Contracting Party, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City.
12. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement.
13. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Contracting Party of noncompliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard.
14. Contracting Party will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect.
15. Contracting Party shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration.
A coverage binder or letter from Contracting Party’s insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and an additional insured endorsement is required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five (5) days of the expiration of coverages.
16. The provisions of any workers’ compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Contracting Party under this agreement. Contracting Party expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials, and agents.
17. Requirements of specific coverage features, or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all-inclusive.
258 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit E
18. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such.
19. The requirements in this Exhibit supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit.
20. Contracting Party agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Contracting Party for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto.
21. Contracting Party agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contracting Party arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.
259 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit F
Exhibit F
Indemnification
F.1 Indemnity for the Benefit of City.
a. Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. b. Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contracting Party or by any individual or entity for which Contracting Party is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Contracting Party.
c. Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction (Limitation on Indemnity). Without affecting the rights of City under any 260 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit F
provision of this agreement, Contracting Party shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City’s active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contracting Party will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City.
d. Indemnification Provision for Design Professionals.
1. Applicability of this Section F.1(d). Notwithstanding Section F.1(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to a Contracting Party who constitutes a “design professional” as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below.
2. Scope of Indemnification. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, reimbursement of attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party.
3. Design Professional Defined. As used in this
Section F.1(d), the term “design professional” shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code § 2782.8.
F.2 Obligation to Secure Indemnification Provisions. Contracting Party agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to 261 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Exhibit F
those set forth herein this Exhibit F, as applicable to the Contracting Party, from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contracting Party in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Contracting Party fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contracting Party agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Exhibit. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth in this Agreement are binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contracting Party and shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
262 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE VETERAN NOMINATIONS FOR INCLUSION ON VETERANS’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MONUMENTS AT CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS
RECOMMENDATION
Approve veteran nominations for inclusion on the Veterans Acknowledgment Monuments at the Civic Center Campus.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Residents submit nominations for the City’s annual Veterans Recognition Ceremony.
Nominations are reviewed by staff and submitted to City Council for approval.
Once approved, the veterans’ names, ranks, and dates of service are engraved on the Veterans Acknowledgement Monuments in Civic Center Park.
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost is approximately $1,000 and funds are available in the Art in Public Places Fund (Account No. 270-0000-60482).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Every year residents submit nominations for the City’s Veteran Recognition Program. Staff review the nominations to ensure they meet the City’s criteria and then submit the nominations for Council consideration. If selected, the Veterans’ names, ranks, and dates of service are engraved on the Veterans Acknowledgement Monuments. Program requirements include:
Active military who served in 1954 and after must be a past or current resident for a minimum of three years;
Active military who served in 1953 and before must be a past or current resident; no minimum years;
Honorable discharge from service; and
Proof of military service.
BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.
263
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
All branches of the military identified by the Department of Veterans Affairs, including reservists, who served a minimum of six years, and merchant marines who served in active duty, are considered.
As part of the Veteran’s Recognition Ceremony, Council will recognize each veteran with a certificate of appreciation and call attention to the Veterans Acknowledgement Monuments with their newly added name.
The following seventeen nominations are submitted for consideration:
2022 Veteran Nominees
Last Name Middle
Name
First
Name
Suffix Branch Rank Years of
Service
Payne J. Cody Air Force SSG 2012-2018
McMullen D. Kevin Air Force SGT 1983-1988
Mauser Harold Jr. Air Force A2C 1961-1965
Thackrah Robert Air Force TSGT 1975-1993
Huiras Michael Air Force MAJ 1985-2012
Sambrano Adam Jr. Army SGT 2010-2011
Ghera J. Andrew Army SPC 2009-2013
Lid Dennis Army MAJ 1959-1980
Mahoney E. James Army SGT 1950-1952
Fleury A. Peter Army MAJ 1963-1973
Rivera Aaron Jr. Marine SSGT 2008-2020
Carranza R. Christian Marine CPL 2018-2022
Johnson Matthew Marine CPL 1985-1989
Ibarra Alejandro Navy MM3 1993-2000
Mehula Joseph Navy CAPT 1971-2000
Arthur E. Lane Navy IC2 1968-1972
Hauser Richard Navy HM2 1951-1955
Nominations and supporting materials are on file with the Community Resources Department.
264
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
ALTERNATIVES
Council may choose to approve any or all nominations.
Prepared by: Michael Calderon, Community Resources Analyst Approved by: Christina Calderon, Community Resources Manager Attachment: 1. Veterans Recognition Program Applications 265
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
266
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
267
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
268
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
269
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
270
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
271
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
272
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
273
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
274
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
275
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
276
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
277
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
278
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
279
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
280
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
281
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
282
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
283
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
284
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
285
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
286
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
287
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
288
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
289
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
290
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
291
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
292
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
293
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
294
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
295
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
296
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
297
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
298
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
299
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
300
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
301
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
302
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
303
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
304
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
305
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
306
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
307
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
308
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
309
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
310
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
311
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
312
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
313
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
314
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
315
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
316
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
317
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
318
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
319
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
320
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
321
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
322
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
323
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
324
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
325
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
326
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
327
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT FOR
CONTRACT SERVICES WITH TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC. FOR
ADDITIONAL ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICES AND APPROVE BUDGET
APPROPRIATION
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Amendment No. 4 to Agreement for Contract Services with Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. to expand on-call planning services to include preparation and processing of fiscal impact analysis and applications for City annexation; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. (Terra Nova) is currently contracted with the City to provide on-call planning services during peak workloads and as needed for expertise on special and complex planning projects.
• Amendment No. 4 (Amendment) (Attachment 1) would include additional planning services to include the preparation and processing of fiscal impact analysis and applications for City annexation, including analysis of areas beyond the sphere of influence (SOI).
FISCAL IMPACT
The current two-year contract with Terra Nova is for $90,000 per year which is already included in the fiscal year 22/23 budget. If approved, Amendment No. 4 proposes an increase of $117,250 for fiscal year 22/23 and 2/24, for a total to not exceed amount of up to $557,225 for the life of the agreement.
Staff is requesting a budget adjustment in the amount of $58,625 under the Planning Division Professional Services account 101-6002-60103 funded by the fiscal year 22/23 budget surplus. Funding in the amount of $58,625 will be budgeted in fiscal year 23/24.
BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2
329 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On August 2, 2022, City staff provided City Council an update on the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Municipal Services Review and Sphere of Influence Review (Attachment 2). Per that update, the last LAFCO meeting concluded with no changes to the City’s SOI.
Terra Nova then drafted a proposal for economic feasibility associated with possible future annexations. The Scope of Work of the proposal can be found as Exhibit A on Attachment 1 and can be summarized in the following three steps:
1) Fiscal impact analysis of annexing the City’s existing SOI 2) Preparation and processing of annexation application 3) Fiscal impact analysis of lands east of the City’s existing SOI (Attachment 3)
Steps 1 and 3 would be completed concurrently as a first phase and then presented to Council for review and consideration prior to beginning Option 2 as a second phase. It is anticipated that the first phase would take approximately three (3) months to complete. The second phase could take up to two (2) years to complete.
Terra Nova currently provides on-call planning services to the City and is an extension of staff in processing complex entitlement applications, including but not limited to General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Specific Plans, Site Development Permits, Tentative Tract Maps and associated environmental documentation. The current on-call contract for Terra Nova was recently extended for two-years. The current contract expires June 30, 2024.
The Amendment would add a one-time amount of $117,250 to perform detailed financial analysis and prepare and process applications associated with annexation. Terra Nova is uniquely qualified to prepare, process, and present on the fiscal impact analysis and annexation applications.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may elect not to approve the Amendment or not undertake the proposed services.
Prepared by: Cheri L. Flores, Planning Manager
Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Amendment No. 4 to Agreement for Contract Services
2. August 2, 2022 Department Report
3. S I Expansion
330 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
ATTACHMENT 1
Rev. 7/28/2017
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH TERRA NOVA PLANNING AND RESEARCH, INC.
This Amendment No. 4 to Contract Services Agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into as of the ______ day of September, 2022 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and TERRA NOVA PLANNING AND RESEARCH INC., a Corporation (“Contracting Party”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on or about September 9, 2019, the City and Contracting Party entered into an Agreement to provide on-call planning services for the City. The term of the Agreement expires on June 30, 2022; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2020, the City and Contracting Party executed Amendment No. 1, to include additional services relating to preparing an update to the Housing, Land Use, and Safety Elements of the General Plan, and increased the Contract Sum by an additional $69,975 per year for fiscal years 2020/21 and 2021/22; and
WHEREAS, on or about June 1, 2021, the City and Contracting Party amended the not to exceed compensation amount by $10,000 for fiscal year 2020/21 due to an increase in workload for complex entitlement projects that required more processing time, and amended Section 2.1 Contract Sum to reflect this change; and
WHEREAS, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to extend the contract by two years (Extended Term) and increase the not to exceed compensation amount by $30,000 over the Extended Term, for fiscal years 2022/23 and 2023/24, due to an increase in workload for planning entitlement applications and associated environmental documentation, and amend Section
2.1 Contract Sum to reflect this change; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2022, the City and Contracting Party executed Amendment No. 4, to expand on-call planning services in the amount of $117,250, to include preparation and processing of fiscal impact analysis and applications for City annexation of the southern Sphere of Influence area through Fiscal Year 2023/2024; and
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
331 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Rev. 7/28/2017
AMENDMENT
In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Section 1.1 Scope of Services is amended to read as follows:
In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall provide additional services related to preparing and processing of fiscal impact analysis and applications for City annexation, as specified in “Scope of Services” attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Services”).
2. Section 2.1 Contract Sum is amended to read as follows:
For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with “Exhibit B” (the “Schedule of Compensation”) in a total amount not to exceed Five Hundred Fifty Seven Thousand and Two Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($557,225.00) for the life of the Agreement, which includes One Hundred Seventeen Thousand and Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($117,250.00) per year for the Extended Term ("Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.7.
In all other respects, the original Agreement shall remain in effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Contracting Party have executed this Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement on the respective dates set forth below.
CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation
____ Dated:
JON MCMILLEN, City Manager
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
332 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Rev. 7/28/2017
MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___
WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
CONSULTANT: TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC.
[Corporation]
By:
Name: Nicole Sauviat Criste
Title: Principal
333 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC.
42635 MELANIE PLACE, SUITE 101, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 (760) 341-4800 August 2, 2022
Mr. Danny Castro & Ms. Cheri Flores
City of La Quinta
78495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
RE: Annexation of Sphere of Influence
Dear Danny and Cheri:
Following our recent conversations, we have prepared the following proposal for several options relating to the annexation of the City’s southern Sphere. The potential scenarios, as we understand them, are:
1. Free-standing analysis of the potential fiscal impacts of annexing only the City’s southern Sphere of Influence (Sphere).
2. Preparation and processing of annexation application, including associated supporting documents.
3. Preparation of a fiscal impact analysis of lands east of the City’s existing southern Sphere, in preparation of a Sphere of Influence amendment application.
It is important to note that certain changes in the law may cause the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to require that we also annex the northern Sphere as part of Option 2. For purposes of this proposal, this addition has not been included, but would be expected to be minor in terms of both scope of work and budget.
Option 1 – Fiscal Impact Analysis, Existing Sphere
This option would result in the preparation of a fiscal impact analysis which would analyze the potential costs and revenues associated with annexing either half or the entirety of the City’s existing southern Sphere. The analysis can be completed in two parts: the Sphere to Jackson Street, or the entire Sphere.
Assumptions regarding land use would be based on existing City General Plan designations, which were included in the City’s existing General Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). GIS data would be used to identify existing vacant and developed lands, and cost and revenue assumptions based on multiple scenarios. Assumptions regarding the pace of build out would be developed with City staff, but it is expected that build out would take several decades. The lack of property tax revenues would be factored into the analysis
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
334 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Danny Castro and Cheri Flores
August 2, 2022
through 2035. At the City’s option, property tax can be calculated for revenues after 2035, or can be assumed to continue to be suspended, should the County not release the debt which currently prevent property tax from being shared with the City.
All costs and revenues would be calculated in 2022/2023 dollars. Separate narrative assumptions regarding the likely increases in police and fire costs would be included in the final report, as they have in the past outpaced inflation when contracts have been renewed. Cost and revenue categories would be developed with City staff, and Terra Nova will rely on assistance from Finance Department staff for historic data and assistance in the development of formulas for revenues such as property transfer tax, in-lieu motor vehicle taxes, transient occupancy tax and sales tax (including both base sales tax and Measure G revenues). Costs will be calculated using the City’s 2022-2023 budget, and generally based on per capita calculations to yield the most conservative assumptions. A report of findings will be prepared for the City’s use.
The scope of work for Option 1 is summarized as follows:
1.A. Build Out Land Use Scenario Working with City staff, develop build out scenario for all lands in the existing Sphere. These land use designations and assumptions (including square footage of commercial space, hotel rooms, residential units, etc.) will be included in the fiscal model.
1.B. Fiscal Impact Analysis Using Terra Nova’s existing analysis model, calculate costs and revenues for up to 4 build out scenarios to be developed in cooperation with City staff. For preliminary consideration, the following are proposed:
• Immediately upon annexation (existing development only); • 2030/Additional development of 25% of currently vacant lands, no property tax;
• 2040/Additional development of 50% of currently vacant lands, with property tax; and
• 2050/Build out of all lands, with property tax.
A report of findings will be prepared, summarizing the fiscal model calculations, and determining whether/when the annexation would be fiscally positive for the City. The analysis will be in a format suitable for use if Option 2 is pursued.
1.C. City Council Presentation Terra Nova will assist City staff in the preparation of a City Council staff report, and attend one City Council meeting (study session) to report on the findings of the analysis.
335 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Danny Castro and Cheri Flores
August 2, 2022
Option 2 – Annexation of Existing Sphere
The City’s Sphere of Influence currently encompasses 8,300± acres located east of Monroe Street, south of Avenue 52, north of Avenue 62, and west of Harrison Street. Lands include single family residential, ranching and farming, limited commercial and resort uses, and vacant lands. The Sphere encompasses the unincorporated community of Vista Santa Rosa. Its Community Council must be consulted on the potential for annexation, and community outreach will be required throughout the area. This is particularly important because the Sphere is populated, and LAFCo will be required to complete a protect hearing after the Board’s action on annexation.
The Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) would process the annexation application. To complete that process, a number of documents are required, including pre-zoning and initiation resolutions, a fiscal impact analysis, a plan of services, and a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document. In this case, we would propose an Addendum to the General Plan EIR, since it included the annexation area. The Addendum would address changes since the preparation of the General Plan EIR, to provide updated CEQA compliance for the annexation.
A Legal Description/Metes and Bounds will also be required. For purposes of this proposal, we have assumed that this task will be undertaken by the City Engineer, and it is not part of this proposal. Option 2 would consist of the following scope of work:
2.A. Community Outreach Hold three community workshops, in the annexation area, to assure that the annexation proposal is supported. This would include at least one Community Council presentation and two other workshops for residents and property owners. It is highly recommended that these workshops be attended by City Council member(s), to improve the outcomes.
2.B. Annexation Applications Terra Nova will prepare the necessary Initiation Resolution and Pre-Zoning Ordinance and submit them to City staff for review and approval. At this time, no land use designation amendments are expected. Our scope of work and budget do not include General Plan or Zoning text or map amendments. Should they become necessary to accommodate uses not currently allowed under City designation(s) or zone(s), we will develop a scope and budget for City consideration. This task will also include attendance at up to two City Council hearings.
Following City Council action, Terra Nova will prepare all necessary LAFCO applications, including attachments, and submit them to City staff for review and approval. We propose a turn-key service for this project, which 336 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Danny Castro and Cheri Flores
August 2, 2022
would include all copies, transmittal and delivery to LAFCO. We have assumed, for purposes of this proposal, that the City will be responsible for LAFCO application fees and preparation of the Legal Description/Metes and Bounds (which must be signed by an engineer or surveyor).
2.C. Plan of Services The Plan of Services must include a description of all services, including general government services, water, sewer, roadway maintenance, police and fire services, library services, etc. The Plan of Services must demonstrate that the City and other agencies can serve the annexation area.
2.D. Fiscal Impact Analysis This task is assumed to have been completed under Option 1. If the City chooses to move forward immediately to annexation, Option 1’s scope of work and budget would be added to Option 2’s.
2.E. CEQA Documentation Prepare a comprehensive EIR Addendum, in a format acceptable to the City, which analyzes the annexation action and the build out of the annexation area. The analysis will incorporate the General Plan environmental documentation to the maximum extent possible. At this time, no technical reports are proposed, since the General Plan EIR included the Sphere, and conditions have not substantially changed.
2.F. LAFCO Coordination and Hearing Attendance Throughout the process, Terra Nova’s project manager will keep in close contact with LAFCO and City staff, and assure a prompt and efficient processing. We will also coordinate LAFCO hearing presentations with City staff, and would help with PowerPoint presentations and handouts, as needed. For purposes of this proposal, we have assumed one LAFCO hearing would be required.
Option 3 – Fiscal Impact Analysis, Expanded Sphere
Option 3 would provide the same level of analysis as Option 1, but for lands east of Harrison Street, in a configuration to be determined in coordination with City staff. The extend to which the City may wish to expand its Sphere is currently unknown, but for purposes of this proposal, we have assumed that the boundary would be determined by the City Council, at the Option 1 study session.
It is important to note that lands east of Harrison are in the unincorporated community of Thermal. The level of potential support for a Sphere Amendment, and an eventual annexation is unknown. Portions of the County’s Thermal community of interest boundary currently occur in the City of Coachella’s Sphere of Influence, and portions are unclaimed.
337 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Danny Castro and Cheri Flores
August 2, 2022
If the City prefers to undertake Option 1 and Option 3 together, and receive a resulting cumulative analysis, that has been provided for in the budget below.
The scope of work for Option 3 is summarized as follows:
3.A. Build Out Land Use Scenario Working with City staff, develop the boundaries and build out scenario for an expanded Sphere. These land use designations and assumptions (including square footage of commercial space, hotel rooms, residential units, etc.) will be included in the fiscal model.
3.B. Fiscal Impact Analysis Using Terra Nova’s existing analysis model, calculate costs and revenues for up to 4 build out scenarios to be developed in cooperation with City staff. For preliminary consideration, the following are proposed:
• Immediately upon annexation (existing development only); • 2030/Additional development of 25% of currently vacant lands, no property tax;
• 2040/Additional development of 50% of currently vacant lands, with property tax; and
• 2050/Build out of all lands, with property tax.
A report of findings will be prepared, summarizing the fiscal model calculations, and determining whether/when the expanded Sphere would be fiscally positive for the City.
3.C. City Council Presentation Terra Nova will assist City staff in the preparation of a City Council staff report, and attend one City Council meeting (study session) to report on the findings of the analysis.
Proposed Budget
The budget has been developed based on the Options and tasks described above.
338 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Danny Castro and Cheri Flores
August 2, 2022
Option 1
1.A Consultation and Meetings $ 2,925.00
Build Out Land Use Scenario $ 5,400.00
GIS Analysis – Land Use Maps $ 2,000.00
1.B. Fiscal Impact Analysis $ 16,600.00
Project Management $ 3,900.00
1.C. Preparation and Attendance,
1 City Council Study Session $ 1,950.00
Admin. Support $ 900.00
Misc. Office $ 100.00
Option 1 Total $ 33,725.00
Option 2
2.A. Community Outreach (3 workshops) $ 9,300.00
2.B. Consultation and Meetings $ 5,850.00
Pre-Annex Reso, Ordinance, and
Application Preparation and Management $ 6,200.00
2.C. Plan of Services $ 4,800.00
2.D. Fiscal Impact Analysis See Option 1
2.E. CEQA Addendum Documentation & Drafting $ 15,650.00
2.F. Project Management $ 6,825.00
Preparation and Attendance, 1 City Council
Hearing and 1 LAFCo Board Hearing $ 3,900.00
Admin. Support $ 1,800.00
Misc. Office: application sets, photocopies, etc. $ 3,000.00 Option 2 Total $ 57,325.00
Option 3
3.A Consultation and Meetings $ 2,925.00
Build Out Land Use Scenario $ 6,550.00
GIS Analysis – Land Use Maps $ 2,200.00
3.B. Fiscal Impact Analysis $ 18,600.00
Project Management $ 3,900.00
3.C. Preparation and Attendance,
1 City Council Study Session $ 1,950.00
339 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Danny Castro and Cheri Flores
August 2, 2022
Admin. Support $ 900.00
Misc. Office $ 100.00
Option 3 Total $ 37,125.00*
*If Option 3 is undertaken concurrent with Option 1, the total of the two Options would be $59,925.00.
Total (each Option undertaken sequentially) $128,175.00 Total (all Options undertaken together) $117,250.00
Conclusion
I believe that this proposal accurately reflects our understanding of what is needed to provide options for the City to consider. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Nicole Sauviat Criste
Principal
340 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Danny Castro and Cheri Flores
August 2, 2022
TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC.®
42635 Melanie Place, SUITE 101
PALM DESERT, CA 92211
760-341-4800
STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE
2022
Terra Nova invoices its clients on a cost-basis using an hourly billing system. The scope of each planning effort is typically broken down by task and assigned estimated necessary staff time and the applicable hourly rate. Reimbursable expenses are charged on a cost basis, except where otherwise indicated. All payments for services rendered are to be made payable to Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. unless otherwise indicated. Clients are invoiced on a monthly basis, and invoices are due and payable upon receipt.
Terra Nova Staff Hourly Rate
Principal Planner $ 195.00
Senior Planner $ 160.00
Associate Planner $ 140.00
Assistant Planner $ 115.00
GIS/Graphics Technician $ 65.00
Administrative Assistant $ 45.00
REIMBURSABLES
Photo Copies (8.5” X 11” BW) $ 0.15 ea.
(8.5” X 11” Color) $ 0.30 ea.
(11” X 17” BW) $ 0.30 ea.
(11” X 17” Color) $ 0.60 ea.
Large Format PlotsBW $ 1.00/S.F.
Color $ 5.00/SF
Telephone Toll Charges Cost
FAX Transmittals Cost
Reproduction, Special photographic services,
document printing, aerial photogrammetry, postage, etc. Cost 341 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Rev. 7/28/2017
Exhibit B
Schedule of Compensation
With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is as noted in detail below per fiscal year and service types, for a total not to exceed amount of $557,225 (“Contract Sum”) for the life of the Agreement encompassing the initial and any extended terms.
The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party identified in Contracting Party’s schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement.
Initial Term: Not to Exceed:
FY 2019/20 On-Call Planning Services $60,000
FY 2020/21 On-Call Planning Services $70,000
FY 2021/22 On-Call Planning Services $60,000
FY 2020/21 & 2021/22 General Plan Update $69,975
FY 2022/23 On-Call Planning Services $90,000
FY 2023/24 On-Call Planning Services $90,000
Initial Term Total: $439,975
Amendment: Not to Exceed:
FY 2022/23 & 23/24 SOI Analysis $117,250
_______________________________
Total Not to Exceed: $557,225
342 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DEPARTMENT REPORT
TO: Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director
Cheri Flores, Planning Manager
DATE: August 2, 2022
SUBJECT: Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission Municipal Services Review and Sphere of Influence Review Update
_____________________________________________________________ Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) initiated a Municipal Service Review (MSR) and Sphere of Influence (SOI) review process in 2019 as required by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. The MSR included all Cities in Riverside County.
La Quinta participated in this review in 2020 and provided background information for the City’s section of the MSR.
What is a MSR?
A MSR is a comprehensive study designed to better inform LAFCO, local agencies, and the community about the provision of municipal services.
What is a SOI?
A SOI is a planning tool adopted and used by LAFCO to designate the future boundary and service area for a city or special district. La Quinta’s SOI is generally described as south of Avenue 52, east of Monroe Street, west of Harrison Street and north of Avenue 62 (Attachment 1).
MSR Findings and Public Hearings
The findings of the MSR state that La Quinta’s SOI should remain unchanged; and LAFCO staff recommended no changes. On June 23, 2022, LAFCO held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the MSR and SOI reviews, where the City of Coachella (Coachella) submitted an “11th hour” proposals requesting changes to Coachella’s SOI boundaries; the two (2) proposals submitted by Coachella encroach into La Quinta’s SOI as depicted in the maps enclosed as Attachment 2. Coachella’s basis for this SOI amendment request is that Coachella provides water and sewer services to a portion of the area. LAFCO continued the public hearing for the MSR and SOI reviews to July 28, 2022, DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 1
ATTACHMENT 2
343 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
to allow LAFCO staff additional time to review information provided at the June 23rd public hearing.
La Quinta staff researched the MSR, LAFCO’s staff reports, and Coachella’s amendment request and information provided, and issued correspondence to LAFCO listing arguments in objection to Coachella’s request. La Quinta Staff and the City Attorney’s Office attended the July 28, 2022, hearing and provided public comments along with the City of La Quinta Mayor supporting LAFCO staff’s recommendation for La Quinta’s SOI to remain unchanged.
Comments provided are summarized below:
La Quinta’s extensive community outreach and compliance with LAFCO’s requirements undertaken during LAFCO’s 2005-2006 MSR review process to have the current SOI boundary history and process undertaken when La Quinta’s current SOI boundaries were assigned La Quinta’s SOI is planned and pre-zoned for in the General Plan Multiple developers’ interests from La Quinta’s SOI to annex into the City’s limits
La Quinta’s analysis and planning to expand public safety services into its SOI for both, police and fire
Coachella’s request to amend the SOI boundary is based on a water service agreement that was entered into in violation of LAFCO policies and based upon substantial misrepresentations.
La Quinta’s community outreach and commitment to continued communication with the property owners and residents of the SOI area and Vista Santa Rosa community
La Quinta is leading the effort to increase and improve energy capacity for the area
La Quinta’s support of LAFCO’s staff recommendation for La Quinta’s SOI to remain unchanged.
LAFCO approved the MSR and SOI review with no change to La Quinta’s SOI.
Next Steps
The team is currently engaging a consultant to prepare an economic feasibility analysis of the La Quinta SOI. Additionally, mailers were sent to landowners within the SOI requesting their feedback on the issue (Attachment 3). A digital survey is also available on the City’s website at
www.laquintaca.gov/vistasantarosa. La Quinta will continue to reach out to the community to gain further feedback.
Attachments: 1. La Quinta’s current SOI Map
2. Coachella’s SOI Amendment Request Maps
3. La Quinta’s Community Outreach Mailer to Vista Santa Rosa 344 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
RSG does not recommend any changes to the La Quinta
SOI and sta concurs with this assessment. Sta recommends con rming the current City of La Quinta SOI boundaries.
ATTACHMENT 1
345
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
346 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of Coachella SOI Expansion Request - Alternative A Data Sources: County of Riverside; LAFCO Ü
Ä86
CLINTON
ST
CALHOUN
ST
FRED WARING DR
OASIS ST
DR
CARREON BLVD
AVENUE 44
46TH
AVE
AVENUE 48
WAS
HING
TON ST
GOLF
CENTER
PKWY
IND
BL
IO
VD
AVENUE 50
MADISON
ST
MONROE
ST
VAN
BUREN ST
AIRPORT BLVD
HY 86S
TYLER ST
GRAPEFRUIT
BLVD
HY
111
JACKSON ST
COUNTRY
CLUB
DR
42ND AVE
AVENUE 52
DILLON RD
HARRISON ST
JEFFERSON
ST
52ND AVE
MILES AVE
COACHELLA
INDIO
LA QUINTA
INDIO SOI
COACHELLA SOI
LA QUINTA SOI
VISTA SANTA
ROSA CC
Augustine
P-28
P-29
P-16
P-14
P-7
1a
1 1
§¨¦10
Earthstar Geographics
Legend
DUC 1 & 1a - Vista Santa Rosa (La Quinta SOI)
DUC 1 - Carver Tract (Indio SOI)
Coachella SOI Request (Not in General Plan)
City SOI Removal Request
Augustine Tribal Area
Vista Santa Rosa Community Council
City of Coachella CVWD Water/Sewer Agreement
County Islands & Pockets (7, 14, 15 & 16)
Cities
City of Coachella
City of Indio
City of La Quinta
City Spheres
Coachella SOI
Indio SOI
La Quinta SOI
Disclaimer: The information shown is
intended to be used for reference and
general display purposes only and is
not to be used as an official map.
Author: Crystal Craig & Michael Henderson
Map Created on 05/25/2022
0 1 2 0.5
Miles
Addition
Addition
Removal
Not in GP
Not in GP
P-15
Currently
Zoned as
Open Space
Indio SOI
Not in GP
City is requesting its SOI to include
areas in P7 and parts of La Quinta &
Indio's SOI. In Addition, City is requesting
removal of areas east of their current SOI
that is zoned as Open Space (O-S).
See Staff Report for details.
Exhibit "SR9a"
ATTACHMENT 2 347 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of Coachella SOI Expansion Request - Alternative B Disclaimer: The information shown is
intended to be used for reference and
general display purposes only and is
not to be used as an official map.
Author: Crystal Craig & Michael Henderson
Map Created on 05/25/2022
Ü
Data Sources: County of Riverside; LAFCO
Ä86
CLINTON
ST
CALH
O
U
N
ST
FRED WARING DR
OASIS ST
DR
CARREON BLVD
AVENUE 44
46TH
AVE
AVENUE 48
WAS
HINGT
ON ST
GOLF
CENTER
PKWY
IND
BL
IO
VD
AVENUE 50 MADISON ST
MONROE
ST
VAN
BUREN ST
AIRPORT BLVD
HY 86S
TYLER ST
JACKSON ST
GRAPEFRUIT
BLVD
HY
111
42ND AVE
AVENUE 52
DILLON RD
HARRISON ST
COUNTRY
CLUB
DR
JEFFERSON
ST
52ND AVE
MILES AVE
COACHELLA
INDIO
LA QUINTA
VISTA SANTA
ROSA CC
Augustine
P-16
P-14
P-7
1a 1
1 INDIO SOI
COACHELLA SOI
LA QUINTA SOI
§¨¦10
Earthstar Geographics
Legend
DUC 1 & 1a - Vista Santa Rosa (La Quinta SOI)
DUC 1 - Carver Tract (Indio SOI)
Coachella SOI Request (Not in General Plan)
City SOI Removal Request
Augustine Tribal Area
Vista Santa Rosa Community Council
City of Coachella CVWD Water/Sewer Agreement
County Islands & Pockets (7, 14, 15 & 16)
Cities
City of Coachella
City of Indio
City of La Quinta
City Spheres
Coachella SOI
Indio SOI
La Quinta SOI
Addition
Addition
Removal
0 1 2 0.5
Miles
P-15
Indio SOI
Not in GP
Not in GP
Currently
Zoned as
Open Space
Not in GP
City is requesting its SOI to include
areas in P7 and parts of La Quinta &
Indio's SOI. In Addition, City is requesting
removal of areas east of their current SOI
that is zoned as Open Space (O-S).
See Staff Report for details.
Exhibit "SR9b"
ATTACHMENT 2 348 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
The City of La Quinta recognizes the unique character, history, and importance of Vista Santa Rosa. In April 2006, the Riverside County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) voted to include Vista Santa Rosa into the City of La Quinta’s Sphere of Infl uence (SOI).
In the past, the City of La Quinta reached out directly to you or the past owner of your property. The vast majority of property owners at that time chose to be included in La Quinta’s SOI.
In June 2022, the City of Coachella submitted a request to LAFCO to switch the majority of Vista Santa Rosa from La Quinta’s SOI into Coachella’s, without any notifi cation or consultation of Vista Santa Rosa residents or the City of La Quinta.
This communication is being sent by the City of La Quinta to keep you informed and discuss your desired interest in remaining in the La Quinta SOI.
Who is LAFCO?
Independent State
authority that evaluates
community boundaries
and SOI’s.
Your opinion counts. Please return the enclosed pre-stamped and self-addressed card to stay informed.
What is an SOI?
Long-range planning tool
used to conduct service
and facilities planning for
potential annexation.
What is Annexation?
The action taken by
LAFCO to add an area
into a city’s jurisdiction.
Find out more at www.laquintaca.gov/vistasantarosa
Call (760) 777-7000
CITY
ADRESS
La Quinta, CA
PRSRT STD
PALM DESERT, CA
US POSTAGE PAID
PERMIT #149
ATTACHMENT 3 349 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
La Ciudad de La Quinta reconoce el carácter único, la historia y la importancia de Vista Santa Rosa. En abril del 2006, la Comisión de Formación del Área Local del Condado de Riverside (LAFCO) votó para incluir a Vista Santa Rosa en la Esfera de Influencia (SOI) de la Ciudad de La Quinta.
Are you interested in staying informed ordiscussing your continued interest in remainingin the LA Quinta SOI? ¿Está interesado en mantenerse informado o discutir
su interés continuo en parmanecer en La Quinta SOI?
If “no”, would you prefer to become part of theCity of Coachella SOI? Si su respuesta es 'no', ¿preferiría ser parte de la Ciudad de Coachella SOI? Additional comments or ideas:
Comentarios o ideas adicionales:
Anteriormente, la Ciudad de La Quinta se comunicó directamente con usted o con el propietario anterior de su propiedad. La gran mayoría de los propietarios en ese momento optaron por ser incluidos en el SOI de La Quinta.
En junio de 2022, la Ciudad de Coachella presentó una solicitud a LAFCO para cambiar la mayoría de Vista Santa Rosa del SOI de La Quinta a Coachella, sin ninguna notificación o sin consultaltar a los residentes de Vista Santa Rosa o la Ciudad de La Quinta.
Esta communicación está siendo enviada por la Ciudad de La Quinta para mantenerlo informado y para discutir su interés en permanecer en La Quinta SOI. ¿Quién es LAFCO?
Autoridad estatal
independiente que
evalúa los límites de
comunidades y los SOI.
Su opinión cuenta. Por favor regrese la tarjeta
pre-sellada con su dirección adjunta para
manténerse informado.
¿Qué es un SOI?
Herramienta de planificación,
a largo plazo utilizada para la
planificación de servicios
e instalaciones para una
posible anexión.
¿Qué es la Anexión?
La acción tomada por
LAFCO para agregar un
área a la jurisdicción de
una ciudad.
Obtenga más información en
www.laquintaca.gov/vistasantarosa
Llama al (760) 777-7000
ECRWSS
Resident
La Quinta, CA
YES
SÍSÍ
YES
NO
NONO
NO
NAME
NOMBRE
ADDRESS
DIRECCIÓN
PHONE
TELÉFONO
EMAIL
CORREO ELECTRÓNICO
CHECK BOX
MARCAR UNA DE LAS CAJASMARCAR UNA DE LAS CAJAS
CHECK BOX
Find out more atwww.laquintaca.gov/vistasantarosa Call (760) 777-7000
PRSRT STD
US POSTAGE PAID
PALM DESERT, CA
PERMIT #149
ATTACHMENT 3 350 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Proposed SOI extension
COACHELLA sphere of influence
LA QUINTA sphere of influence
INDIO sphere of influence
PALM DESERT sphere of influence
LA QUINTA
INDIO
COACHELLA
INDIAN WELLS
PALM DESERT
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community ¯ 00 0.2 .4 0.8 1.2 1.6Miles Jan 2022
Proposed sphere of influence extension
LEGEND
proposed_sphere_of_influence_extensionCitySpheres2
SPHERENAME
COACHELLAINDIOLA QUINTAPALM DESERT
CITYNAME
COACHELLAINDIAN WELLSINDIOLA QUINTAPALM DESERT
"7&/6&
"*31035#-7%
.0/30&45
)"33*40/45
)*()8":
)*()8":
"6(645*/&
"55"$).&/5
285
351
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
352
CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
City of La Quinta
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT REVISIONS TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE (GPA 2020-0001), MAKING MINOR
MODIFICATIONS TO THE 2022-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT PER REQUESTS
FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; CEQA: THE HOUSING ELEMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY ANALYZED UNDER EA 2021-0010; LOCATION: CITY-WIDE
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution to adopt revisions to the 2022-2029 Housing Element Update (GPA2020-0001) to make changes to the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) analysis and specific Policies and Programs to assure compliance with State law and determine that the Housing Element revisions are consistent with Environmental Assessment 2021-0010.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Council adopted the Housing Element Update (Element) for the 2021-2029 planning period on February 15, 2022.
The adopted Element was submitted to California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for final approval on February 28, 2022.
On April 29, 2022, HCD found that the adopted Element was not in compliance with State law and gave further comments (Attachment 1).
Staff addressed the comments and provided the revised Element to HCD on June 13, 2022 (Attachment 2).
On June 29, 2022, HCD confirmed that the revisions were sufficient, and that the Housing Element conforms to State law (Attachment 3). The Planning Commission, at its July 26, 2022 meeting, unanimously voted to recommend approval of revisions to the Housing Element to the Council.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1
353 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
FISCAL IMPACT – None.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Element revisions proposed in Attachment 1 consist of additions of data to the AFFH section and adding metrics to selected Policies and Programs to quantify the City’s targets for various implementation activities, including accessory dwelling units, creative housing solutions, and housing partnerships to generate affordable units. The revisions, shown in Attachment 1, are not substantive, but do assure that the City will comply with State law, and receive certification from the State for the planning period.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
At its regular meeting of July 26, 2022, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the proposed revisions.
PUBLIC NOTICE
This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 9, 2022. No written comments have been received as of the date of this writing.
Any written comments received will be handed out at the City Council hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City prepared an Initial Study for the Housing and Safety Element updates, which was adopted by Council when the Housing Element was originally adopted (EA2020-0010). No substantial changes were made, and no further analysis is required under CEQA.
Prepared by: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner
Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. HCD Letter of April 29, 2022
2. Housing Element Edits
3. HCD Letter of June 29, 2022
354 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REVISIONS
TO THE 2022-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT
CASE NUMBER:
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2020-0001
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on September 20, 2022, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider revisions to General Plan Amendment 2020-0001 for the 2022-2029 Housing Element, as mandated by State law; and
WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 9, 2022, as prescribed by the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on July 26, 2022, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and after review and consideration of this item, and hearing all public testimony, adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2022-018 and recommended adoption of said General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify adoption of said General Plan Amendment:
1. The General Plan Amendment does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, have an adverse effect on wildlife, achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, or cumulatively result in significant impacts to the environment.
2. Internal General Plan Consistency. The amendments to the Housing Element are internally consistent and do not conflict with policies and programs of other elements of the General Plan.
3. Public Welfare. Approval of the amendments will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, and will instead assure the provision of housing for all segments of the 355 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Resolution No. 2022 -
General Plan Amendment 2020-0001; Housing Element Revisions Adopted:
community, and the construction of safe buildings outside of fire-prone areas and flood zones.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; and
SECTION 2. That General Plan Amendment 2020-0001 is determined to be consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the La Quinta City Council for Environmental Assessment 2021-0010; and SECTION 3. That it does hereby adopt revisions to General Plan Amendment 2020-0001 for the 2022-2029 Housing Element [Exhibit A], incorporated herewith by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council held on this 20th day of September 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
LINDA EVANS, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
356 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Resolution No. 2022 -
General Plan Amendment 2020-0001; Housing Element Revisions Adopted:
ATTEST:
________________________
MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
357 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
1 HOUSING
PURPOSE
The Housing Element of the La Quinta General Plan establishes the City’s policy relative to the maintenance and development of housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents. Jurisdictions within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region must complete the statutory housing element update for a planning period that extends from 2022 to 2029.
The 2022 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) proposes that La Quinta provide the regulatory framework to facilitate the development of new housing units potentially affordable to a range of income levels.
The City’s RHNA is 1,530 units for the 2022–2029 planning period. The RHNA includes housing planning goals for very low, low, moderate, and above moderate income households.
The City’s RHNA by affordability level is 420 units of housing affordable to very low income households, 269 affordable for low income households, 297 affordable for moderate income households, and 544 above moderate income units. The Housing Element demonstrates the land resources, financial resources, market trends, and governmental efforts that have the potential to facilitate and encourage housing development and rehabilitation to meet the RHNA.
Setting
The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley. A worldrenowned vacation destination, La Quinta’s population varies by season. La Quinta’s permanent population is estimated at 40,660 persons in 2020. The seasonal population exceeds 10,000, increasing the City’s population by 25% during winter months.
La Quinta households are generally wealthier than other areas of Riverside County. The median household
income of La Quinta in 2018 was $79,889, significantly
higher than the Riverside County median
household income of $63,948.
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. 2022-XXX
Project: Housing Element Readoption
Adopted:
358 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
2 This income trend is related to the types of new housing available in La Quinta. La Quinta is home to many master planned communities.
Although the number of multifamily units in the City increased by more than 30% from 2012 to 2019, multifamily units continue to represent less than 7 percent of the total housing stock.
Housing Resources
California housing element law allows local governments to obtain credit toward their RHNA housing goals in three ways: constructed and approved units, vacant and underutilized land, and the preservation of existing affordable housing.
Moderate income households are able to afford some new and fairly new rental and for sale units. Very Low and Low income households, however, will continue to require subsidized affordable housing.
Housing Plan
The housing element sets forth a comprehensive housing plan consisting of goals, policies, and programs to address existing and projected housing needs. The detailed programs provided are designed to identify sites to exceed the RHNA, assist the development of affordable housing, remove governmental constraints to housing, preserve the existing housing stock, provide equal housing opportunities, and promote energy and water conservation in residential uses.
Quantified Objectives
The goals, policies, and programs will guide housing-related decision making and facilitate attainment of the 2022–2029 RHNA housing targets. As shown in Table II-1, future units both planned and to be planned, make up the bulk of new construction counted toward the RHNA.
Each jurisdiction must establish quantified objectives by income category to prepare to meet or exceed the RHNA for the 2022-2029 planning period. The City of La Quinta’s quantified objectives are based on constructed and approved units and land resources for new housing and programs created to address other existing and projected housing needs.
Achieving the City of La Quinta’s quantified objectives will rely on third party financing. The City will continue to participate in the development of affordable housing with private party partners. Please see the Housing Resources section.
359 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
3 Table II-1
Quantified Objectives 2022–2029
Type of Housing
Extremely
Low
Very
Low Low Moderate
Above
Moderate Total
New Construction
New Units 210 210 269 297 544 1,530
Rehabilitation/Conservation
Residential
Rehabilitation
10 15 30 35 90
Conservation
360 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
4 INTRODUCTION
Purpose
The Housing Element of the La Quinta Plan establishes the City’s policy relative to the maintenance and development of housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents. These policies will guide City decision making and set forth a housing action program through 2029.
These commitments are an expression of the City’s desire to facilitate adequate housing for every La Quinta resident. The City’s housing policy is consistent with the statewide housing goal of “attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California Family.” The purpose of the Element is to establish official policy which:
v Identifies existing and projected housing needs, and inventories resources and constraints that are relevant to meeting these needs.
The assessment and inventory include:
Community Profile
Housing Profile
Land Resource Inventory
Governmental and Nongovernmental Constraints Analysis
Analysis of Special Needs Housing
Identification of Assisted Units “At Risk” of Conversion v Identifies the community’s goals, objectives, and policies relative to the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. v Sets forth a schedule of actions (programs) the City is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element.
The Housing Element has been designed to address key housing issues in the City. These issues include appropriate housing types to meet the needs of all segments of the community while maintaining a low density character, provision of affordable housing for special needs groups in the community, and the maintenance of the existing housing stock.
Consistency with State Planning Law
California Government Code requires that every City and County prepare a Housing Element as part of its General Plan. In addition, State law contains specific requirements for the preparation and content of Housing Elements. Sections 65580 to 65589.8 of the California Government Code contain the legislative mandate for the housing 361 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
5 element. State law requires that the City’s Housing Element consist of “identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement and development of housing.”
State law also requires that the City evaluate its housing element approximately every eight years to determine its effectiveness in achieving City and statewide housing goals and objectives, and to adopt an updated Element that reflects the results of this evaluation.
State law is very specific about the content of the Housing Element and makes it clear that the provision of affordable housing is the responsibility of all local governments. The City is expected to contribute toward regional housing needs and to contribute to the attainment of state housing goals.
The most recent updates to Housing Element law occurred in 2017, when a series of bills were passed into law to address the State’s determination that California was experiencing a State-wide housing crisis. The laws passed in 2017 addressed a wide range of housing-related issues, including Housing Elements, which are summarized below. • SB 2 established a recordation fee for real estate documentation which would fund planning grants for affordable housing and affordable housing projects.
• SB 3 placed a $4 billion general obligation bond on the November 2018 ballot to fund affordable housing, farmworker housing, transitoriented development, infill infrastructure and home ownership. • SB 35 mandated a streamlined approval process for infill affordable housing projects in communities that have not, according to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) met their affordable housing allocation (RHNA).
• AB 72 allowed HCD to find a housing element out of compliance with State law, and to refer the non-compliant element to the State Attorney General for action at any time during a Housing Element planning period.
• AB 73 provided State-funded financial incentives for local jurisdictions which choose to create a streamlined zoning overlay for certain affordable housing projects.
• SB 166 required that development proposals on local jurisdictions’ sites inventory cannot be reduced in density without findings, and/or the identification of additional sites to result in ‘no net loss’ of affordable housing units in the sites inventory.
362 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
6 • SB 540 provided State funding for the planning and implementation of workforce housing opportunity zones for very low, low and moderate income households.
• AB 571 modified the farmworker tax credit program to allow HCD to advance funds to migrant housing center operators at the beginning of each planting season, and allowed migrant housing to remain open for up to 275 days annually.
• AB 678 amended the Housing Accountability Act to limit a local jurisdiction’s ability to deny low and moderate income housing projects by increasing the required documentation and raising the standard of proof required of a local jurisdiction.
• AB 686 (approved in 2018) required a public agency to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. • AB 879 amended the annual reporting requirements of local jurisdictions to HCD regarding proposed projects, including processing times, number of project applications and approvals, and required approval processes.
• AB 1397 amended the requirements of adequate sites analysis to assure that sites are not only suitable, but also available, by requiring additional information in site inventories.
• AB 1505 allowed local jurisdictions to adopt local ordinances that require affordable housing units on- or off-site when approving residential projects.
• AB 1515 established a ‘reasonable person’ standard to consistency of affordable housing projects and emergency shelters with local policies and standards.
• AB 1521 placed restrictions on the owners of affordable housing projects when terminating or selling their projects.
General Plan Consistency
The goals, policies, standards, and proposals within this element relate directly to and are consistent with all other General Plan elements. The Housing Element identifies programs and resources required for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing to meet the existing and projected needs of its population.
The Housing Element is affected by development policies contained in the Land Use Element, which establishes the locations, types, intensity, and distribution of land uses throughout the City and defines the buildout land use scenario. In designating total acreage and density of residential development, the Land Use Element places an upper limit on the number and types of housing units constructed in the City. The acreage designated for a range of commercial and office uses creates 363 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
7 employment opportunities for various income groups. The presence and potential for jobs affects the current and future demand for housing at the various income levels in the City. In addition, the Land Use Element has been updated in accordance with Senate Bill 244. There are no disadvantaged unincorporated communities in the City’s Sphere of Influence.
The Circulation Element also affects implementation of the Housing Element. The Circulation Element establishes policies for providing essential streets and roadways to all housing that is developed. The policies contained in the other elements of the General Plan affect the quality of life of the citizens of the City through the control of the amount and variety of open space and recreation areas, acceptable noise levels in residential areas, and programs to provide for the safety of residents.
The Housing Element utilizes the most current data available. Data sources include the U.S. Census, American Community Survey, California Department of Finance (DOF), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Riverside County, and various City documents and resources, among others.
Scope and Content
The Housing Element is organized in the following manner:
v Introduction: A statement of the purpose of the Housing Element and statutory requirements, a statement of the relationship between the Housing Element and other General Plan elements, the scope, content and organization of the Element, and a summary of the public participation process.
v Evaluation of Past Element: A summary of the achievements and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the past Housing Element. v Housing Vision Statement: A statement describing the future vision of housing in La Quinta as developed by the citizens and elected officials of the City. The policies in the Housing Element are designed to bring this vision to fruition.
v Community Profile and Housing Profile: A discussion of the characteristics of the population, households, and housing stock in La Quinta, including growth and affordability trends.
364 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
8 v Fair Housing: A discussion of the City’s commitment to and implementation of federal and state fair housing laws, as well as identified issues, concerns, and strategies.
v Housing Needs: An analysis of groups in the City that may have special housing needs, the implications of the affordability of housing stock in relation to household income, and projected housing needs. v Housing Constraints: A discussion of governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the development of housing and opportunities for energy conservation in residential planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation.
v Housing Resources: An inventory of constructed and approved units, land available for residential development, and underutilized sites available for residential redevelopment, and an analysis of the ability of these projects and sites to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
v Preservation of At Risk Units: A description of any assisted, affordable multifamily units that are eligible to convert to market rate within 10 years of the planning period.
v Goals, Policies, and Programs: A description of housing goals, policies, and programs responsive to the City’s current and projected housing needs. Also included is a summary of the City’s quantified objectives for new residential construction, rehabilitation, and financial assistance during the planning period.
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE 2014-2021 HOUSING
ELEMENT
To develop appropriate programs to address the housing issues identified in this Housing Element Update, the City of La Quinta has reviewed the effectiveness of the housing programs adopted in the 2014-2021 Housing Element.
The State of California requires an assessment of the previous housing program to identify areas of accomplishment as well as areas in which improvement could occur following the implementation of new or modified programs.
The following section reviews the progress in implementation of the programs, the effectiveness of the Element, and the continued appropriateness of the identified programs. Analysis of the past element is quantified where such information is available. 365 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
9 As described in the evaluation of Policies and Programs below, the City continued to assist households with special needs, including seniors, disabled residents and persons experiencing homelessness (see evaluation of Policies 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5; and Programs 4.4.b, 5.5.a, and
5.5.b below). These programs resulted in benefits to these special needs populations, including the furtherance of programs by housing homeless residents at the Coral Mountain apartments; through CVAG’s regional housing efforts for Coachella Valley homeless persons; and by the major rehabilitation and new units provided for seniors and disabled seniors at the Washington Street apartments. The policies and programs were very effective in assisting special needs populations.
The results of the analysis provided the basis for developing the comprehensive housing strategy for the 2022-2029 planning period.
Adequate Sites for Housing
GOAL H-1
Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City’s existing and projected population.
v Policy H-1.1
Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels.
Program 1.1.a: To address the City’s RHNA allocation for extremely low income households, 26 of the 68 new units at the Washington Street Apartments will be designated for extremely low income households. The additional 19 units identified in the RHNA will be given priority either at Washington Street Apartments, or at projects on sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II50). § Objective: Encourage the provision of 45 extremely low income units in new projects during the planning period. § Timing: 2015 for 26 units, 2015-2021 as projects are
constructed for 19 units
§ Funding Source: Private Funding, Tax Credit Financing, Other sources as identified
§ Responsible Agency: Planning Department
§ Evaluation:
366 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
10 § Renovation and expansion of Washington Street Apartments was completed in November 2019, resulting in the
rehabilitation of existing 72 units and construction of 68 new units, for a total of 140 units. Twenty-four (24) of the 68 new units were designated for extremely low income households.
The additional 19 units identified in the RHNA were not constructed. The program will be modified to address the 2022-2029 RHNA allocation.
§
v Policy H-1.2
Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing.
Evaluation:
No annexations were needed for the construction of affordable housing during the 2014-2021 planning period. The Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) continues to offer increased opportunities for affordable housing development by allowing it at higher densities within all commercial zones and several residential sites. This policy was successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy H-1.3
Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available.
§ Evaluation:
§ The City continued to look at projects for affordable housing on infill sites and in areas where transit and employment were readily available. Coral Mountain Apartments and
Washington Street Apartments were both planned on such
sites and their construction has been completed.
§ In 2016, the City introduced the mixed use (MU) overlay in the zoning code (La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.140) to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components in a cohesively designed and constructed manner. Mixed use
projects will locate residents in proximity to services, employment, and transportation hubs and provide
interconnected multi-purpose paths for alternative modes of transportation. Mixed use projects can claim incentives, including reduced parking requirements, reduced plan check and inspection fees, and density bonuses. The policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
367 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
11 Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing
GOAL H-2
Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate income households.
v Policy H-2.1
Increase housing choices for lower and moderate income households. v Policy H-2.2
Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing.
v Policy H-2.3
Pursue a variety of forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing.
Program H-2.3.a: Collaborative Partnerships
The City shall meet with parties interested in affordable housing development to discuss types of incentives available and requirements for obtaining assistance, discuss appropriate sites for affordable housing, and foster professional collaboration between the City and affordable housing stakeholders.
§ Objective: Continue to collaborate with nonprofits and the development community to develop affordable housing.
§ Timing: Project-by-project basis, by request, or on an annual basis.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
The City Manager’s office supports affordable housing efforts and coordinates regularly with affordable housing partners such as Lift to Rise.
The City will continue to assist affordable housing developers in securing third party financing. During the 2014-2021 planning period, Coral Mountain Apartments was completed with Desert Cities Development.
This program was successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-2.3.b: Affordable Housing Renter-to-Owner Transition Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set 368 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
12 aside all or a portion of their units for low income households.
LIHTC projects can transition from rental to ownership units. The units must remain rentals for 15 years, at which time some projects convert to ownership units. Typically a portion or all of the rent paid for the 5 years prior to the conversion is put toward the purchase of the unit. This enables lower income households to invest in the property in which they have been living and benefit from its appreciation.
Existing stalled condominium and townhome projects are prime opportunities for low income tax credits to be used for renter-toowner programs. § Objective: Investigate the use of LIHTCs to finance affordable single-family attached rental development that can transition, after 15 years, into moderate income ownership housing. § Timing: Complete study by end of fiscal 2015
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
Investigation into the use of LIHTCs to finance affordable single-family attached rental development was not completed. However, it is still considered important. This program will continue into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-2.3.c: Affordable Housing Renter-to-Owner Transition There are many resources that the City, nonprofits, or for-profit developers may utilize to subsidize the construction and maintenance of affordable housing. Some of the most
prominent resources are described below.
§ Objective: Advertise other financial resources through the affordable housing page of the City’s website, apply for grants and competitive loans, and form partnerships with the development community to obtain additional financial
resources.
§ Timing: Update website with funding information and
partnership opportunities every six months or earlier if appropriate.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
369 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
13 Low Income Tax Credits
Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. A minimum of 20 percent of the units must be affordable to low income households and 40 percent of the units must be affordable to moderate income households.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act provides favorable financing to affordable housing developers. The Redevelopment Agency, development community, and local, regional, and national banks are encouraged to work together to meet their obligations pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act.
California Housing Finance Agency Program
The California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) has three singlefamily programs for primarily moderate and middle income homebuyers: the Home Ownership Assistance Program and the Affordable Housing Partnership Program. Each provides
permanent mortgage financing for first-time homebuyers at below-market interest rates.
HOME Funds
HOME is the largest Federal block grant distributed to state and local governments for the creation of lower income housing.
Cities apply when Notices of Funding Availability are issued.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program
HUD’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program makes emergency assistance grants available to local governments for the acquisition, redevelopment, and renting or resale of foreclosed properties at-risk of abandonment.
Riverside County First-Time Homebuyers Program
Continue participation in the Riverside County First-Time Homebuyers Program for low and moderate income households.
Mortgage Credit Certificate
The Riverside County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program is designed to assist low and moderate income first time
homebuyers. Under the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, first-time homebuyers receive a tax credit based on a percentage of the interest paid on their mortgage. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for home loans, as it increases the 370 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
14 effective income of the buyer. Under federal legislation, 20 percent of the funds must be set aside for buyers with incomes between 75 and 80 percent of the county median income.
Finance Agency Lease-Purchase Program
Riverside/San Bernardino County Housing Finance Agency Lease Purchase Program provides down payment assistance and closing costs for eligible households up to 140 percent of the area median income.
Housing Choice Voucher (formerly Section 8) Referrals
Housing Choice Vouchers allow lower income households to use rental subsidies anywhere in the County, including La Quinta.
Evaluation:
Information about financial resources and partnership opportunities available for subsidizing the construction and maintenance of affordable housing was not provided on the City’s website. However, it continues to be a priority, and City staff plans to accomplish this task by 2022. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-2.3.d: Sweat Equity and Shared Equity
Sweat equity and shared equity programs provide lower and moderate income households with ownership assistance. Sweat equity refers to the exchange of time and effort, usually in the form of construction activities, for an affordable ownership opportunity.
• Objective: Continue to work with organizations that offer sweat and shared equity housing programs to lower and
moderate income households in La Quinta.
• Timing: Meet with organizations annually or more frequently (if requested or advantageous) to identify opportunities for coordinated efforts or potential housing projects.
• Funding Source: General Fund
• Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
The City has worked with both Habitat for Humanity and the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition in the development of sweat equity homes in the past. However, no units were built in collaboration with the City during the 2014-2021 planning period. This program has been successful in the past and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 371 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
15 Removal of Governmental Constraints to Housing
GOAL H-3
Create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents.
v Policy H-3.1
Remove unnecessary regulatory constraints to enable the construction or rehabilitation of housing that meets the needs of La Quinta residents, including lower income and special needs residents.
Evaluation:
In 2017, the City adopted Ordinance No. 561 to amend Municipal Code Section 9.60.090 (previously “Second Residential Units”) to establish development standards and criteria for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).
Under these amendments, ADUs are permitted as accessory uses in all residential zones and qualifying units can receive allowances for parking requirement exemptions and utility connection exemptions. The amendments reduce regulatory constraints associated with ADU development and expand housing opportunities for lower-income residents.
The City will continue to monitor all municipal code requirements to assure that they do not impose a constraint on the development of affordable housing. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. v Policy H-3.2
Coordinate the development of affordable housing with the provision of key utilities to ensure prompt and adequate service.
Evaluation:
All new project development plans are provided to the utility providers for review and comment on a case-by-case basis. The City coordinates with utility providers to assure that adequate utilities are in place and operational to serve the needs of residents. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy H-3.3
Incentivize the development of affordable housing to facilitate the development of housing for the City’s lower and moderate income households.
372 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
16 Evaluation:
In 2016, the City introduced the mixed use (MU) overlay in the zoning code (La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.140) to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. The City also amended and completed Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) regulations and district boundaries in ordinances passed in 2016 and 2019. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-3.3.a: Priority Water and Sewer Service
In compliance with state law, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential project. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings, and requires future water
management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development.
§ Objective: Route the adopted Housing Element to the CVWD and notify them of changes and future updates to the
Housing Element.
§ Timing: Upon Housing Element adoption
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
CVWD is responsible for compliance with state law. The City will provide the adopted Housing Element to CVWD, notify them of changes and future updates, and continue to coordinate with them in the processing of applications in a timely manner. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-3.3.b: Reduced Parking Standards
There are several potential opportunities to reduce parking standards for special types of development in La Quinta. While the City already has special parking standards for multifamily senior housing, there is potential to further reduce those requirements, particularly for lower and moderate income senior housing.
The compact, mixed-use character of the Village area may also foster opportunities for parking reductions or joint-use opportunities. Lower and moderate income households may own fewer vehicles than above moderate income households, 373 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
17 and be more inclined to walk or use public transportation.
Incentives such as reduced parking requirements could be offered for affordable housing developments.
§ Objective: Study the potential impacts of adopting reduced parking requirements or shared parking standards for senior housing and housing in the Village, particularly for projects serving lower and moderate income households.
§ Timing: Zoning Ordinance Update 2014
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
The City updated Incentive Based Parking Adjustments (Zoning Code Section 9.150.050) in 2017 which allows a reduction in parking spaces of up to fifteen percent, subject to approval by the Planning Commission.
Section 9.150.050.B addresses opportunities for parking reductions in the Village Build-Out Plan Area, including potential reductions of fifty percent and other variations subject to approval by the director. The program is complete and will not be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-3.3.c: Encourage Lot Consolidation
Several small lots in the Village Commercial would have improved development potential through lot consolidation. The City will study, identify, and adopt regulatory incentives to encourage and facilitate lot consolidation. Potential incentives include fee deferral or reductions, parking requirement reduction, and relief from various other development standards that could potentially increase the cost of the project.
§ Objective: Identify opportunities and adopt incentives for lot consolidation in the Village Commercial zone
§ Timing: July 1, 2015
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
The City completed the La Quinta Village Build-Out Plan and EIR in 2017.
Ordinance No. 553 amended several chapters of the Municipal Code related to development standards for the Plan area; development standards are provided in Section 9.70.110. Projects in the Plan area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre. Per Section 9.140.090.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, 374 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
18 expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. Parking requirement reductions and variations in the Village Build-Out Plan area are addressed in Section 9.150.050.B. Although the regulatory portion of this program is complete, the need for lot consolidation in the Village remains, and the program will be modified to address this.
GOAL H-4
Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties.
v Policy H-4.1
Protect the quality of La Quinta’s neighborhoods through the rehabilitation of both affordable and market-rate homes.
Evaluation:
The rehabilitation of both affordable and market-rate homes is an ongoing process supported by the City. The rehabilitation of 72 existing units at Washington Street Apartments, an affordable housing project, was completed in 2019. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy H-4.2
Promote financial and technical assistance to lower and moderate income households for housing maintenance and improvements.
Evaluation:
The City continues to support Riverside County and other third-party programs to fill this need. The City provides information on the HERO financing program for energy efficiency home improvements. City staff will conduct research on technical assistance available by agencies, including County assistance programs, and direct households to these programs when appropriate. This policy will be extended into the 2022- 2029 planning period.
v Policy H-4.3
Encourage the retention and rehabilitation of existing single-family neighborhoods and mobile home parks that are economically and physically sound.
375 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
19 v Policy H-4.4
Enhance neighborhoods that presently provide affordable housing with drainage, lighting and landscape amenities, and parks and recreation areas.
Program H-4.4.a: Housing Condition Monitoring
To better understand the City’s housing needs the quality and condition of the housing stock must be inventoried on a regular basis. The inventory should focus on older neighborhoods, such as those south of Calle Tampico, west of Washington Street, and north of Highway 111.
§ Objective: Maintain an inventory of housing conditions (updated approximately every five years) to enable the City to properly target Code Compliance and rehabilitation
resources.
§ Timing: Complete by June 30, 2014
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
There was no activity during the 2014-2021 planning period. City staff will conduct a housing condition survey in the 2022-2023 Fiscal Year. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-4.4.b: County of Riverside Senior Residential Rehabilitation The Minor Senior Home Repair program allocates grants up to $250 per year for lower income seniors for minor housing repairs, such as painting doors or trim, or repairing a window. The Enhanced Senior Home Repair Program provides major
rehabilitation and repair for low income seniors, providing a onetime grant for repairs to homes owned and occupied by seniors and/or persons with disabilities. The maximum level of assistance for this program is $3,000 per year.
§ Objective: Continue to refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside Minor and Enhanced Senior Home Repair programs and other local resources. Assist
homeowners in completing applications as necessary.
§ Timing: Throughout planning period, on a case-by-case basis § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
376 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
20 Evaluation:
The City does not operate its own senior home repair program; however, the City Manager’s office coordinates with lower income households and refers them to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency, as appropriate. This program is an ongoing effort and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-4.4.c: County of Riverside Home Repair Grant
The County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Home Repair Program provides lower income households with up to $6,000 for home repairs such as a new roof, new air-conditioner, or a handicap ramp. As a jurisdiction in Riverside County, lower income La Quinta households are eligible for this grant. § Objective: Refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside for home repair grants.
§ Timing: Throughout planning period, on a case-by-case basis § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
To the extent that these County programs have been funded, the City has referred homeowners to the appropriate County staff. This effort is ongoing and the program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-4.4.d: Rehabilitation Resources List
Lower and moderate income homeowners may need assistance in affording important home repairs and improvements. The City can assist these households by compiling and sharing a listing of local, state, and federal programs offering rehabilitation assistance.
§ Objective: Provide a rehabilitation resources list on the affordable housing and code compliance pages of the City’s website. Use the list, in online or printed form, as a reference for code violators.
§ Timing: Create list by June 30, 2014
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
377 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
21 Evaluation:
City staff has not prepared a list of rehabilitation resources for home repairs and improvements; however, such an effort is still considered important. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Equal Housing Opportunity
GOAL H-5
Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons.
v Policy 5.1
Provide the regulatory framework to create an environment in which housing opportunities are equal.
Evaluation:
The City complies with all housing laws regarding equal housing opportunities, including updates on accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in 2017 and again in 2020/2021. The City regularly reviews and amends its Municipal Code to assure that all aspects of it comply with the law. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. v Policy 5.2
Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the sale or rental of housing.
Evaluation:
The City complies with all housing laws and distributes fair housing information. The City monitors housing complaints and refers all complaints to the Riverside County Fair Housing Council, which has jurisdiction over such matters. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy 5.3
Encourage support services for the Coachella Valley’s senior and homeless populations through referrals and collaborative efforts with non-profits and other jurisdictions.
Evaluation:
The City provides funding to and participates in CVAG's homelessness programs and provides financial assistance to Martha’s Village and Kitchen and Coachella Valley Rescue Mission for homeless prevention services, in 378 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
22 addition to providing bus passes for homeless people and collaborating with non-profits to provide rapid rehousing and other services. This policy involves ongoing efforts and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy 5.4
Assist in the creation of a continuum of care for the homeless population and those transitioning into permanent housing.
Evaluation:
The City provides ongoing support for the CVAG Homeless Committee and participation in CVAG's homelessness programs. In the 2014-2021 planning period, the City housed five homeless families in Coral Mountain apartments through the Homeless Prevention Program. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy 5.5
Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may create barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design.
Evaluation:
During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City further amended the Zoning Code Section 9.60.320 to refine procedures for requesting, submittal, and review of applications for reasonable accommodation. The City continues to facilitate development of accessible housing for all its residents. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-5.5.a: Regional Facilities for the Homeless
Continue to support and collaborate with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Homelessness Committee efforts to maintain a regional homeless facility that provides housing as well as supportive services. Continue to contribute, if funds allow, $250,000 annually to CVAG’s efforts to provide housing and support services across the Coachella Valley.
§ Timing: City staff will continue to collaborate with CVAG throughout the planning.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
379 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
23 Evaluation:
The City participated in and collaborated with CVAG's Homelessness Committee to provide supportive programs for homeless people in the Coachella Valley. After the closure of Roy’s Desert Resource Center in 2017, CVAG contracted with a non-profit to operate its Coachella Valley Housing First program and initiated the CVHEART program to coordinate and expand regional homelessness efforts. The City worked with homeless shelters and re-housing programs directly and through CVAG. Continuing support of these programs will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-5.5.b: Transitional Housing and Permanent Supportive Housing
Transitional housing typically accommodates homeless people for up to two years as they stabilize their lives and does not meet emergency needs. Transitional housing includes training and services that are vital for rehabilitating and enriching the lives of the formerly homeless. Transitional housing facilities provide families and individuals with a safe place within which to rebuild their lives and prepare for independence. Permanent supportive housing is affordable housing with on- or off-site services that help a person maintain a stable, housed, life.
§ Objective: The Zoning Ordinance shall allow transitional and supportive housing as a residential use in all zones which allow for residential development, and subject only to those restrictions that apply to similar residential uses (single or multi-family units) of the same type in the same zone, and will not be subject to any restrictions not imposed on similar dwellings, including occupancy limits.
§ Timing: Coordinate with 2009/2011 General Plan Update § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Planning Department
Evaluation:
Several zoning ordinance amendments were completed in the 2014-2021 planning period. The amendments define homeless shelters and transitional shelters; allow transitional and supportive housing with a conditional use permit in the Medium Density, Medium-High Density, and High Density Residential zones; and allow transitional shelters with a conditional use permit within Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zones. Emergency shelters are allowed in all commercial zones.
This program was completed and will not be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
380 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
24 Program H-5.5.c: Fair Housing Referrals
Fair housing organizations provide dispute resolution and legal assistance to tenants and landlords in conflict. Such services are particularly important for lower and moderate income
households unable to afford counsel.
§ Objective: Continue to refer tenants and landlords to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. Provide information on fair housing resources on the City’s website and at City Hall.
Identify and coordinate with local nonprofits, service
organizations and community groups that can assist in
distributing fair housing information.
§ Timing: Referral service as needed. Information to be placed on website and local groups identified by January 2014
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
City staff referred residents to the County Fair Housing Council as needed.
The City website provides information on the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC) and how to contact the FHCRC. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-5.5.d: Directory of Services
While numerous services are available to special needs and lower income households, it can be difficult to readily have access to these resources. A directory provides the contact information necessary to seek housing assistance.
§ Objective: Develop an online directory of services and information to provide La Quinta residents with contact information for community organizations and service
providers that address special needs.
§ Timing: Update website by March 2014
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
The City website includes directories of affordable rental and ownership housing developments, as well as information about senior home purchase loan programs, personal finance resources, and other housing resources. City housing staff will continue to add additional information as needed. This program involves ongoing efforts and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
381 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
25 Energy and Water Conservation
GOAL H-6.1
Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials.
v Policy H-6.1
Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption.
Evaluation:
The zoning ordinance was amended in 2017 to include standards for mixed use and planned unit development (PUD). The purpose of the PUD is to allow flexibility in the design of residential projects, and encourage the development of creative, high-quality residential projects that provide attractive living environments in a setting that is different from standard single family home development. The City also continues to promote energy efficiency through rebate programs provided by utility companies and other agencies. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy H-6.2
Facilitate housing development and rehabilitation that conserves natural resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions.
Evaluation:
New and renovated units at Washington Street Apartments were completed in 2019 and built to meet or exceed the most recent energy efficient building standards. Energy-conserving materials and systems include faucet flow restrictors, Energy Star-rated appliances and roofs, dual-glazed windows, and vented kitchen range hoods. The City website provides information about numerous home energy efficiency products, programs, and services, including financial assistance and residential rebate programs, that help homeowners conserve natural resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy H-6.3
Encourage and enforce green building regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing.
382 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
26 Evaluation:
The City adopts and enforces the California Building Code (CBC) and California Green Building Standards Code per State requirements. The 2019 CBC updates include solar and green building requirements. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy H-6.4
Focus sustainability efforts on measures and techniques that also assist the occupant in reducing energy costs; therefore reducing housing costs.
Evaluation:
The City has supported several residential developments that incorporate sustainable efforts and help reduce the occupant’s energy costs. These properties include Coral Mountain Apartments and Washington Street Apartments for disabled seniors and veterans; both were completed during the 2014-2021 planning period. The City continues to promote its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and implement sustainability principles and measures in the General Plan. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
v Policy H-6.5
Use and encourage emerging technologies to reduce high demands for electricity and natural gas including use of passive solar devices and where feasible other renewable energy technologies (e.g., biomass, wind, and geothermal).
Program H-6.5.a: Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program Continue to implement the Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program.
§ Objective: Implement green goals, policies, and programs that accurately represent the City’s direction in resource conservation and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.
Implement design standards for residential and commercial structures that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation.
§ Timing: As projects are proposed
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department
Evaluation:
The Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program includes providing information on the City’s website about home improvement programs, 383 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
27 financial resources and rebates, recycling programs, water and energy conservation measures, and other resources that facilitate resource conservation and greenhouse gas emission reductions. The City adopted and enforces the 2019 California Building Code and California Green Building Code that require design standards that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. The City also implements the policies and programs of its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and General Plan. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-6.5.b: Energy Conservation Partners
In working toward a sustainable La Quinta, the City and its residents will need to collaborate with utilities and service providers. Partnerships with the Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, Southern California
Association of Governments and other entities will be an important component of making La Quinta a more livable city. § Objective: Continue to meet with and seek insight from utilities, service providers, and other entities involved in energy conservation efforts appropriate for La Quinta.
§ Timing: As part of regular coordination meetings with utilities § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Community
Development Department
Evaluation:
The City coordinates with utility companies to promote and implement energy conservation programs in residential construction. The City website includes descriptions of and contact information for home improvement energy conservation measures and financing programs, including rebates, offered by SoCalGas, Imperial Irrigation District, CVWD, and Burrtec Waste and Recycling. Development plans and construction activities are closely coordinated with utilities during planning and operational purposes. This program is ongoing and will be extended through the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-6.5.c: Imperial Irrigation District Programs
The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) is proactive in energy savings via conservation programs, product rebates, and general tips. An average home owner can save up to 10 percent on energy/energy bills by taking advantage of IID programs. Home owners can 384 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
28 utilize the free “Check Me!” program, which checks the refrigerant charge and airflow of their air conditioning/heating units. IID also offers a rebate on the purchase of higher efficiency air conditioning units, high efficiency refrigerators,
programmable thermostats, and ENERGY STAR equipment. City staff has held several meetings with IID representatives to discuss opportunities for collaboration to conserve energy in La Quinta, including water management opportunities for golf courses and golf-oriented communities.
§ Objective: Maintain contact with IID to market energy efficiency programs and rebates that are most beneficial to La Quinta residents and homeowners.
§ Timing: Quarterly through Desert Cities Energy Partnership meetings
§ Funding Source: General Fund, IID program funds, and
potential AB 811 special assessment district funds
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Community
Development Department
Evaluation:
The City’s Going Green website provides information on IID programs and rebates through links to their websites, including the Residential ENERGY STAR product rebate program. IID continues to offer free, in-home residential and commercial energy audits and follow-up lists of recommendations intended to reduce electricity consumption and costs.
The City promotes these programs through meetings with Homeowners’ Association boards and various City sponsored events to encourage La Quinta residents and businessesto sign up for energy audits and reduction programs. However, IID’s future is currently unknown; in addition to continuing to recommend IID as a conservation resource, the City will need to explore additional opportunities for residents to acquire energy savings via conservation programs, products, rebates, and general tips. This program will be modified for the 2022-2029 planning period.
Program H-6.5.d: Weatherization Assistance
The Federal Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program, in conjunction with state and local programs, provide low or no cost weatherization and insulation services to reduce the heating and cooling costs for low income households. § Objective: Encourage low income homeowners or renters to apply for free energy audits, home weatherization, and utility 385 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
29 rebate programs by advertising available programs on the City’s website and at City Hall.
§ Timing: Advertise annually as program funds are available § Funding: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Building and Safety Department, City Manager’s Office
Evaluation:
The City website and distribution materials/flyers describe and provide contact information for Imperial Irrigation District’s free energy auditsfor homes, home energy efficiency surveys, financing programs and tax credits, and rebates and incentive programs. The City also promotes SoCalGas’ free energy and water conservation kit for residential customers and no-cost, energy-saving home improvements for income-qualified homeowners and renters. This program is successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. However, the focus will continue to be on local and regional, not federal, programs, which will be reflected in revisions to the program.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
California Government Code requires that local governments make a diligent effort to achieve public participation from all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. The City’s public outreach efforts focused on community and stakeholder workshops, information disseminated through the City’s website, electronic mail notifications, and public hearings. Together, this input helped the City understand and respond to the housing needs of the community. The Housing Element draft was also posted on the City’s website.
Community and Stakeholder Workshops
Workshop invitations were sent to local and regional development entities, advocacy groups, and interested parties via email. In addition, workshops were advertised on the City’s website and in email blasts to the City’s extensive resident email list. The workshops consisted of a Planning Commission presentation, two City Council updates, a Housing Commission presentation and a public workshop attended by more than 15 community members.
The comments received at these workshops included the following, which are addressed in this Housing Element:
v Concerns about how to address overpayment by both owners and renters.
386 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
30 v The difficulty of financing new projects, which now require two or three times as many funding sources as in the past.
v Concerns regarding whether short term vacation rentals are impacting the availability of housing for permanent residents. v Assuring that land inventory sites for all types of housing. v Assuring that development standards, fees and processing times reflect the needs of affordable housing projects.
v January 12, 2021 to present the process of the Update, discuss the City’s RHNA allocation and seek input from the Commission. The Commission had no questions or comments.
v Joint Planning Commission and City Council Study Session on August 3, 2021, to inform the members on the comments received by HCD, and discuss the distribution of sites. The members had several questions and comments on the need for housing, including creative housing solutions like tiny homes; the City’s ongoing efforts to provide it, and the challenges associated with funding projects.
The comments and questions led to amendments and additions to policies and programs which are included in this Element. The amendments included changes to programs to develop incentives, including fee reductions and development standard concessions for affordable housing projects, and working closely with the development community to secure funding from all available sources.
The participants’ concerns were considered in the preparation of the goals, policies and programs, including additions and changes that further commit the City to partnering with affordable housing developers in the development of projects in the future; the City’s recent actions to limit short term vacation rentals; and including inventory sites of varying sizes and locations close to services, transit, schools and job centers.
The Element was posted on the City’s website, and a public comment period provided from September 10 to 24, 2021. The public comment period was advertised through Facebook and Instagram posts, and a Nextdoor announcement from the City, and an email blast to all those invited to the community workshops (see Appendix A). City received no comments during the comment period.
State Review and Public Hearings
The Draft Element was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review and
certification. The City has received and responded to review comments from HCD to address its concerns.
387 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
31 The Housing Element was posted on the City’s website for 30 days prior to City Council hearing. The posting was advertised on the City’s website, on its Facebook page, and individual emails sent to all of the housing advocates, developers and residents who participated in the City’s workshops (see Appendix A).
HOUSING VISION STATEMENT
A Housing Vision Statement was developed based on key housing issues and through cooperation of the citizens and elected officials of the City of La Quinta when the General Plan was adopted. It has been reviewed periodically, but remains true to the City’s goals and aspirations. The housing policies and programs included in this Housing Element are designed to bring this vision to fruition.
“The City of La Quinta’s vision of the future for housing focuses on encouraging the provision of suitable housing for all City residents while maintaining and enhancing the City’s high quality of life for its residents.
Through its housing programs, the City will facilitate the maintenance and improvement of its existing housing stock resources, and encourage the production of a variety of new housing to meet residents’ needs, while preserving the overall character of the City.”
COMMUNITY PROFILE
The housing needs of the City are determined by characteristics of the population (age, household size, employment, and ethnicity) and the characteristics of housing available to that population (i.e., number of units, tenure, size, cost, etc.). This section explores the characteristics of the existing and projected population and housing stock in order to identify potentially unmet housing needs in La Quinta. This information provides direction in updating the City’s Housing Element goals, policies, and programs. The demographics used in this section are derived from US Census data for 2000 and 2010; US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 3 and 5 year estimates data, California Department of Finance, and the City of La Quinta.
Population
The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley subregion of Riverside County. The Coachella Valley includes the cities 388 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
32 of Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, lndio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage, as well as large areas of unincorporated Riverside County.
La Quinta ranks high in population growth among California’s 482 cities.
During the 1990s, the population of La Quinta grew by 111.3 percent, making it the fastest growing city in the Coachella Valley at the time. The number of residents in the City increased from 11,215 to 37,467 between 1990 and 2010. The population further increased to 40,704 by 2018, a smaller increase of 8.6 percent compared to the previous two decades.
The absolute increase in population for cities in the Coachella Valley provides another perspective for analysis when size is taken into consideration. For example, Indio grew by the greatest number of people from 2010 to 2018, with an increase of approximately 15,199 people. La Quinta experienced the fourth largest numerical increase, with an added population of 3,237.
Table II-2
Population Growth
City/Region 2000 2010 Census 2018 ACS
2000-2010 2010-2018
% # % #
La Quinta 23,694 37,467 58.1 13,773 40,704 8.6 3,237
Coachella Valley 255,788 346,518 35.5 90,730 382,296 10.3 35,778 Riverside County 1,545,387 2,189,641 41.7 644,254 2,383,286 8.8 193,645 Source: 2000 and 2010 Census; American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates Table II-3
Population Growth In Coachella Valley Cities
City 2000 2010 Census 2018 ACS
Change 2000-2010 Change 2010–2018
% # % #
Cathedral City 42,647 51,200 20.1 8,553 54,037 5.5 2,837 Coachella 22,724 40,704 79.1 17,980 44,849 10.2 4,145
Desert Hot Springs 16,582 25,938 56.4 9,356 28,430 9.6 2,492 Indian Wells 3,816 4,958 29.9 1,142 5,317 7.2 359
Indio 49,116 76,036 54.8 26,920 91,235 20.0 15,199
La Quinta 23,694 37,467 58.1 13,773 40,704 8.6 3,237
Palm Desert 41,155 48,445 17.7 7,290 52,124 7.6 3,679
Palm Springs 42,807 44,552 4.1 1,745 47,525 6.7 2,973
Rancho Mirage 13,249 17,218 30.0 3,969 18,075 5.0 857
Total 255,790 346,518 35.5 90,728 382,296 10.3 35,778
Source: 2000 and 2010 Census; American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates 389 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
33 Seasonal Population
The seasonal or part time resident population is not included in the population estimates compiled by the Census Bureau because people are classified according to the location of their primary residence. The California Department of Finance (DOF) provides a yearly estimate of total built housing units and an estimate of the number of vacant units.
In resort communities like La Quinta, the number of vacant units reflects the number of units that are not occupied year-round, as well as those that are ready for year-round occupancy but have not been inhabited.
According to the 2010 Census, the overall vacancy rate for La Quinta is
36.9%, while the seasonal vacancy rate is 27.5%. According to the 2018 ACS Census, the overall vacancy rate for La Quinta is 38.3%, while the seasonal vacancy rate is 31.8%.
Age Composition
Table II-4, Age Distribution, shows the change in age groups from 2010 to 2018. In 2018, children and youth groups (ages 0–19) comprised 23.8 percent of the population, young and middle-age adults (20 to 54 years) represented 36.5 percent and all age groups over 55 years made up 39.8 percent. The data show that the population is slowly aging.
In 2018, the median age in La Quinta was 47.1 years, significantly older than Riverside County and the State of California averages of 35.8 and
36.7 years, respectively. This represents a 3% increase in the City’s median age since 2010, when the median age was 45.6 years.
Table II-4 indicates that the rate of growth in the 0-19 age groups slightly declined from 2010 to 2018. The 20-54 age groups reflect a slower growth rate, making up 2.8% less of the City’s population in 2018.
Conversely, growth in the 55+ age category shows a 3.5% increase in the share of City population compared to 2010.
Table II-4
Age Distribution
Age Group
2010 2018
# % # %
Under 5 years 1,784 4.8 2,048 5.0
5 to 9 years 2,136 5.7 2,549 6.3
10 to 14 years 2,624 7.0 2,212 5.4
15 to 19 years 2,544 6.8 2,877 7.1
20 to 24 years 1,629 4.3 1,635 4.0
25 to 34 years 3,239 8.6 3,567 8.8
35 to 44 years 4,457 11.9 4,231 10.4
45 to 54 years 5,435 14.5 5,413 13.3
55 to 59 years 2,652 7.1 2,849 7.0
390 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
34 Table II-4
Age Distribution
Age Group
2010 2018
# % # %
60 to 64 years 3,151 8.4 3,318 8.2
65 to 74 years 4,989 13.3 5,929 14.6
75 to 84 years 2,217 5.9 3,127 7.7
85 years & over 610 1.6 949 2.3
Total 37,467 100 40,704 100
Median age 45.6 47.1
Source: 2010 U.S. Census Tables P12 and P13; American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Tables DP05 and B01002
Race and Ethnicity
Table II-5 describes the racial and ethnic distribution of the population for 2010 and 2018. Residents who categorize themselves as white comprise the largest race/ethnicity. The distribution remains largely stable from 2010 to 2018 with a small increase in the Asian group and a decrease in the American Indian and Alaska Native group. The percentage of Hispanic or Latino residents increased slightly from 30.3% to 34.1%.
Table II-5
Population by Race/Ethnicity
Race/Ethnicity 2010 2018
# % # %
One Race
White 29,489 78.7 32,239 79.2
Black or African American 713 1.9 772 1.9
American Indian and Alaska Native 230 0.6 48 0.1
Asian 1,176 3.1 1,529 3.8
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific
Islander
41 0.1 20 <0.1
Some Other Race 4,595 12.3 4,757 11.7
Two or More Races 1,223 3.3 1,339 3.3
Total 37,467 100 40,704 100
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 11,339 30.3 13,872 34.1 Source: 2010 U.S. Census, Tables P3 and P12H; American Community Survey 2014- 2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP05
Employment
The economy of the Coachella Valley was traditionally agriculturedriven, but has gradually shifted to tourism, service industries, and residential uses.
Although employment patterns typically induce housing demand, the regional economy of the Coachella Valley differs from most parts of the state. Here, employment is created by housing demand, manifested in 391 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
35 the construction and staffing of resorts and second homes. Tourism and resort development are leading indicators that predict employment and housing demand. Although the tourist economy is seasonal in the Coachella Valley, it is generally stable and does not typically suffer the severe effects of recessions as do other regions dependent on manufacturing and consumer related goods. And with the benefit of desert weather, the resorts in the La Quinta area are increasingly operating year-round. There is, however, some seasonal fluctuation in the labor market, which can further compound the problem of economic stability in the lower income sectors of the labor force, affecting their ability to sustain themselves in the off season (summer) months.
According to the US Census Bureau (2014-2018 American Community Survey), in 2018 the civilian labor force over 16 years comprised 17,180 persons. Table II-6 shows the types of employment by industry held by La Quinta residents in 2018. The majority of jobs held by La Quinta residents were in “educational services, health care, and social assistance”, followed by “arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food service” industries, “retail trade,” and “professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste management” industries.
As shown in Table II-7, more than one-third (37.1%) of the City’s civilian employed labor force is employed in “management, business, science, and arts” occupations, followed by “sales and office” occupations (26.5%) and “service” occupations (20.8%). Table II-8 shows the major employers in the City of La Quinta. The largest employers are in the nonmanufacturing economy and are directly related to the provision of services, including education, big box retail, and recreational and resort activities. In 2019 the City surveyed its major commercial and hospitality facilities to identify major employers in the city limits. The largest employers surveyed include Desert Sands Unified School District, La Quinta Resort & Club/PGA West, Wal-Mart, Costco, and Home Depot.
The Great Recession, with onset in late 2007, saw high unemployment and job losses in the Coachella Valley. At the lowest point, about every seventh person lost their job.1
Regional employment started to increase
in 2011, but annual growth was still slower than pre-Recession levels until 2017, suffering more impact than western Riverside County, the state, and nation. The construction sector was hit hardest regionally, with approximately 70% of jobs lost and only 14% recovered by December 1 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Figure 24.
392 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
36 2017.2 The Retail Trade and Wholesale Trade sector lost around 6,700 jobs but has basically returned to pre-Recession levels. Two sectors have fully recovered and even added jobs: Education and Health Services and, to a lesser extent, Leisure and Hospitality.
Between 2012 and 2019, annual unemployment rates in La Quinta saw an overall decline from a high of 7.5% in 2012 to a low of 4.1% in 2019.3 However, analysis of employment data from 2005 to 2017 shows that, as of December 2017, La Quinta had not fully recovered the job losses it incurred during the Great Recession. The City lost about 30% of jobs, relative to peak employment, and had recovered only about 5%.4 This scenario is roughly the same for seven other Coachella Valley cities; only Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage had recovered and exceeded their previous peaks.
Future employment opportunities for City residents will include a variety of new retail, service, and entertainment jobs at the luxury Montage and Pendry hotels that are under construction at the SilverRock Golf Resort, a Residence Inn recently constructed on Highway 111, as well as other development resulting from the City’s 2019 Highway 111 Corridor Plan.
CV Link, a 49-mile long regional, multimodal pathway under construction, will run north of the Highway 111 corridor and is anticipated to support new business and employment opportunities. 2 Ibid, Figures 25 and 26.
3 California Employment Development Department annual unemployment rates (labor force), not seasonally adjusted, not preliminary. 4 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Figure 28.
393 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
37 Table II-6
Employment by Industry (2018)
Industry Employed
Persons
% of Employed
Persons
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, mining 352 2.0 Construction 1,056 6.1
Manufacturing 691 4.0
Wholesale Trade 242 1.4
Retail Trade 2,479 14.4
Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 657 3.8
Information 199 1.2
Finance, insurance, real estate, rental, leasing 1,309 7.6 Professional, scientific, management, admin., waste
management 1,977 11.5
Educational services, health care, social assistance 3,373 19.6 Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation,
food services 2,947 17.2
Other services, except public administration 1,021 5.9
Public Administration 877 5.1
Total civilian employed 16 years and over 17,180 100.0
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table S2403 Table II-7
Employment by Occupation (2018)
Occupation # %
Management, business, science, and arts occupations 6,368 37.1 Service occupations 3,577 20.8
Sales and office occupations 4,547 26.5
Natural resources, construction, and maintenance
occupations
1,588 9.2
Production, transportation, and material moving
occupations
1,100 6.4
Total civilian employed population 16 years and over 17,180 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table S2401 394 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
38 Table II-8
Principal Employers in City of La Quinta
Name of Employer Employed
Persons
Description
Desert Sands Unified School District 2,852 Government
La Quinta Resort & Club/ PGA West1 1,412 Hotel & Golf Resort Wal-Mart Super Center 300 Retailer
Costco 290 Retailer
Home Depot 212 Retailer
Target 180 Retailer
Lowe’s Home Improvement 150 Retailer
Imperial Irrigation District 134 Utility Company
In N Out 84 Fast Food Restaurant
Vons 83 Grocery Store
Rancho La Quinta 77 Golf Resort
Traditions Golf Club 71 Golf Resort
Source: City of La Quinta 2018/19 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. 1 La Quinta Resort & Club and PGA West are accounted for as one entity; as such, their employment numbers are reported together as of FY 2015-16.
Many La Quinta residents work in other communities, and many residents from other cities work in La Quinta. Table II-9 describes the employment locations of La Quinta residents. As shown, only 23.1% of City residents work in La Quinta. A quarter (25.0%) work in Palm Desert.
Table II-9
Commuting Patterns
Where La Quinta
Residents Work
No. of La Quinta
Residents
% of Total
Indio 1,087 14.1
Cathedral City 254 3.3
Palm Desert 1,933 25.0
Palm Springs 827 10.7
Coachella 438 5.7
La Quinta 1,788 23.1
Desert Hot Springs 44 0.6
Rancho Mirage 879 11.4
Indian Wells 484 6.3
Source: 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Table 6. Based on 2015 data.
General Income Characteristics
Income can often vary significantly by region, industry, and type of job.
Table II-10 describes average income per worker by industry in the Coachella Valley. As shown, the highest-paying sectors are Finance/Insurance/Real Estate, Government, and Information, with incomes averaging around $50,000 to $60,000. The lowest-paying sectors include Retail Trade, Other Services, and Leisure and Hospitality, with incomes averaging around $31,000.
395 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
39 Table II-10
Average Income by Industry, Coachella Valley
Industry
Average Income
per Worker, 2017
Agriculture $29,571
Construction $45,488
Manufacturing $46,340
Retail Trade $32,281
Information $50,493
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate $59,726
Professional and Business Services $43,736
Education and Health Services $48,322
Leisure and Hospitality $31,513
Government $58,711
Other Services $31,836
Logistics $45,114
Source: 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Figure 29
The median household income in La Quinta in 2018 was $79,889, higher than the Riverside County median household income of $63,948. Since 2010, the median income for La Quinta residents has increased, with the 2010 median family income reported as $57,768 for the County of Riverside and $67,444 for the City of La Quinta. Household income estimates (2018) by total households are provided in Table II-11.
Table II-11
2018 Household Income Estimates
Income Category Households % of Households
Less than $10,000 901 5.8%
$10,000 - 14,999 386 2.5%
$15,000 - 24,999 846 5.5%
$25,000 - 34,999 1,384 8.9%
$35,000 - 49,999 1,771 11.4%
$50,000 - 74,999 2,201 14.2%
$75,000 - 99,999 1,792 11.6%
$100,000 – 149,999 2,872 18.5%
$150,000 – 199,999 1,254 8.1%
$200,000 or more 2,098 13.5%
Total 15,505 100.0%
Median Income $79,889
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP03 396 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
40 HOUSING PROFILE
This section provides an overview of La Quinta’s existing housing stock.
Since the establishment of the La Quinta Hotel in 1926, La Quinta has been considered a world class resort and has been a favored location for vacation and retirement homes.
Generally, single-family residences were constructed on an individual basis from the 1950s until the La Quinta Country Club area was developed in the 1960s. In 1975, a brief building boom began due to speculation. Recessions in the 1980s and early 1990s resulted in an oversupply of housing and little construction in the City. A rebound occurred beginning in the late 1990s. As a result, the City has seen a rapid increase in residential development of all types, but predominantly single-family units. There are many projects clustered around recreation amenities. In many of these communities, second units and guest houses (typically used to house guests, extended family members, and service workers) are processed concurrently with the primary unit.
The bust of subprime lending practices in the early and mid-2000s led to the Great Recession, which resulted in a steep decline in home values, rapid increase in foreclosures, and decrease in the number of households eligible to enter the ownership housing market.
Construction of new housing slowed in La Quinta and many regional and national markets.
Housing Characteristics
Between 2012 and 2019, the number of housing units in the City increased by 1,179 units from 23,585 to 24,764 units. This change represents a 5.0 percent increase (see Table II-12).
There are five types of housing units for which data is presented in Table II-12: detached and attached single family units, multifamily in a building of 2 to 4, or 5 or more units, and mobile homes. The predominant type of dwelling unit in the City of La Quinta continues to be single-family detached.
Together, detached and attached single-family homes comprised 88.0 percent of all units in the City in 2019. The number of multifamily (5 or more) units in the City increased by 31.9% from 2012 to 2019, although multifamily units represented 11.1 percent of the total housing stock in 2019.
397 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
41 Table II-13 shows the number of building permits issued for new residential construction in La Quinta between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2020, covering nearly all of the 2014-2021 planning period.
The data show that 944 permits were issued. The majority (92.7%) were for single-family detached units, 4.0% were for single-family attached units, 2.2% were for multi-family 3-4 units, and 1.1% were for multi-family 5+ units.
Table II-12
Housing Stock Trends – 2012 to 2019
Building Type 2012 2019 Change 2012–
2019
Units % of
Total1
Units % of
Total1
# %
Single-Family
Detached
18,622 79.0 19,310 78.0 688 3.7
Single-Family
Attached
2,387 10.1 2,476 10.0 89 3.7
Multifamily, 2-4
units
1,127 4.8 1,140 4.6 13 1.2
Multifamily, 5 or
more units
1,218 5.2 1,607 6.5 389 31.9
Mobile Homes 1 231 1.0 231 1.0 0 0
Total Dwelling
Units
23,585 100.0 24,764 100.0 1,179 5.0
Source: Department of Finance Table E-5, 2012 and 2019. 1 differences due to rounding
Table II-13
New Residential Construction, 2014-2020
Building Permit Type No. of Permits1 Percent of Total
Residential Dwellings:
Single-Family Detached 875 92.7%
Single-Family Attached 38 4.0%
Multi-Family 3-4 units 21 2.2%
Multi-Family, 5+ units 10 1.1%
Total Permits: 944 100.0%
Source: La Quinta Building Division
1 Permits issued between 1/01/14 through 12/31/20
Households
Before current housing problems can be understood and future needs anticipated, housing occupancy characteristics need to be identified.
The following is an analysis of household type, growth, tenure, and vacancy trends. By definition, a “household” consists of all the people occupying a dwelling unit, whether or not they are related. A single person living in an apartment is a household, just as a couple with two children living in the same dwelling unit is considered a household. 398 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
42 From 2010 to 2018, the number of La Quinta households grew from 14,802 to 15,505 at a 4.6% rate, as shown in Table II-14. In 2018, the majority of households (56.7%) consisted of married couple families, followed by non-family households (29.2%).
Table II-14
Household Growth Trends (2010 – 2018)
Year Number of
Household
s
# Increase % Increase
2010 14,820 - -
2018 15,505 685 4.6
Source: 2010 U.S. Census, Table P28; American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02
Table II-15
Household Types
Household Type No. of
Households
% of
Total
Family households: 10,977 70.8
Married couple family 8,797 56.7
Male householder, no wife
present
747 4.8
Female householder, no
husband present
1,433 9.2
Non-family households 4,528 29.2
Total Households 15,505 100
Average Household Size 2.62
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02
Housing Tenure
The number of owner-occupied housing units in the City has not fluctuated much since 2010. In 2018, La Quinta owners occupied 76 percent of total units in the City, compared to 75.2 percent in 2010.
Vacancy
The vacancy rate is a measure of the general availability of housing. It also indicates how well the types of units available meet the current housing market demand. A low vacancy rate suggests that many households have found housing. However, fewer vacant housing units remain available and households needing housing may have difficulty finding housing within their price range. A high vacancy rate may indicate either the existence of a high number of units undesirable for occupancy or an oversupply of housing units.
399 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
43 As shown in Table II-16, the vacancy rate in La Quinta was 38.3 percent (9,638 units) in 2018, reflecting the seasonal resort character of the City.
Among the vacant units, 31.8 percent of total housing units in the City are for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use. On that basis, the City’s actual net vacancy rate is 6.5%, including 353 units available for rent, 596 available for sale, 271 rented or sold and awaiting occupancy, and 414 of other vacant status.
Of the 15,505 (61.7%) occupied housing units in the City, about 71.8% are owner-occupied, and 28.2% are renter-occupied. The homeowner vacancy rate is 5.0%, and the rental vacancy rate is 7.4%, both of which are moderately low.
Table II-16
Vacancy Status
Vacancy Status Units Percentage
Occupied Units
Owner-occupied 11,125 44.2
Renter-Occupied 4,380 17.4
Subtotal 15,505 61.7
Vacant Units
For rent 353 1.4
Rented, not occupied 28 0.1
For sale only 596 2.4
Sold, not occupied 243 1.0
For seasonal, recreational, or
occasional use 8,004 31.8
For migrant workers 0 0
Other vacant 414 1.6
Subtotal 9,638 38.3
Total Units 25,143 100
Vacancy Rate:
Homeowner vacancy rate - 5.0
Rental vacancy rate - 7.4
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Tables DP04 and B25004
Age and Condition of Housing
Housing age is a factor for determining the need for rehabilitation.
Without proper maintenance, housing units deteriorate over time. Also, older houses may not be built to current housing standards for fire and earthquake safety.
Approximately 71.4 percent of the housing stock in the City of La Quinta has been built since 1990, and about 44 percent of the current stock has been constructed since 2000 (see Table II-12). Less than 5 percent was constructed prior to 1970.
400 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
44 The oldest homes in the City are found in the Cove neighborhood. Of the older single-family homes, many are well maintained and are mostly occupied by long term residents. A small proportion of older homes have not been well-maintained. These homes are typically smaller than new homes in the City; some less than 1,000 square feet. As land values increase, it will become economically viable to replace or rehabilitate some of these structures. These homes are primarily in the Cove area and behind City Hall.
Outside of the Cove area, the homes are generally newer. Many new units in these other areas are custom homes in gated communities and are maintained by their owners in accordance with the requirements of a homeowners association.
Table II-17
Age of Housing Stock in La Quinta
Year Built Total Percentage
After 2014 125 0.5
2010-2013 276 1.1
2000-2009 10,651 42.4
1990–1999 6,901 27.4
1980–1989 4,235 16.8
1970–1979 1,762 7.0
1960–1969 460 1.8
1950–1959 459 1.8
1940–1949 153 0.6
Before 1939 121 0.5
Total Stock 25,143 100.0
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP04 Housing is considered substandard when conditions are found to be below the minimum standards of living defined by Section 1001 of the Uniform Housing Code. Households living in substandard conditions are considered as needing housing assistance even if they are not seeking alternative housing arrangements. According to a 2007 City-wide housing conditions survey (see Housing Conditions Survey, below), the majority of units needing minor or moderate rehabilitation are in the Cove area. Many of the housing units in the Cove area are more than 30 years old. After 30 years homes generally require major rehabilitation, such as a new roof or updated plumbing.
401 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
45 Another measure of potentially substandard housing is the number of housing units lacking adequate kitchen and plumbing facilities. In La Quinta, there are 83 units (0.54% of all units) lacking complete kitchens and 61 units (0.39% of all units) lacking plumbing facilities. More homeowner units have deficiencies than rental units. These homes could potentially benefit from rehabilitation programs.
Table II-18
Housing Units Lacking Facilities
Type of Deficiency
Owner-Occupied Units Renter-Occupied Units Total
No.
Total
Units
in City
Percent
of Total
Units
No.
Total
Units in
City
Percent
of Total
Units
No.
Percent
of Total
Units
Lacking complete
kitchen facilities
69 11,125 0.62 14 4,380 0.32 83 0.54
Lacking plumbing
facilities
61 11,125 0.55 0 4,380 0 61 0.39
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25053 and B25049 Housing Conditions Survey
The last citywide survey of housing conditions was conducted in November 2007. Homes were evaluated based on the condition of structural elements (walls, supports, columns), doors and windows, paint and cosmetics, roofing, and landscape and streetscape.
The survey found that most homes were in good condition and required little or no maintenance or repairs. Approximately 7% of the housing stock (1,408 units) was categorized as “Deferred Maintenance” and needed minor repairs, such as refreshed paint and landscaping. Thirtysix (36) units were designated “Minor Rehabilitation” and demonstrated numerous deferred maintenance conditions; 83% of these units were in the Cove. Twenty-three (23) units designated “Moderate Rehabilitation” were in a deficient state and needed major roof repair, window replacement, or similar repairs; 87% of them were in the Cove. Four (4) units were designated “Substantial Rehabilitation or Replacement”; they required complete replacement of roofs, walls, and/or other structural elements and their condition endangered the health, safety, or well-being of occupants. The City has not conducted a housing conditions survey since 2007; however, one is planned for fiscal year 2021/2022.
The Code Compliance staff is proactive in its work to track property maintenance. As described above, the primary area where maintenance issues occur is in the Cove. The City offers programs that assist homeowners and apartment complex owners with home maintenance and repair costs. Homeowners interested in reducing their utility bills 402 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
46 through upgrades now have an alternative to tapping their mortgage for home equity loans. Through partnership with the City of La Quinta, HERO and Ygrene are offering low-fixed interest rates and flexible payment terms of up to 20 years, with repayments made through property taxes. Currently, both programs offer a wide array of home energy products including: windows, skylights, and doors; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; solar panels; roofing and insulation; artificial turf; and drip irrigation. In addition, Ygrene also offers pool pumps and related equipment and lighting products; HERO offers electric vehicle charging stations and water heating products.
Rooms per Unit
Table II-19 shows the number of bedrooms per unit, ranging from no bedroom (studios) to five or more bedrooms. Table II-19 also describes the number of bedrooms per unit, in relation to the total number of units for both 2011 and 2018. The most prominent change proportionally was in no-bedroom (studio) units, which increased 1.7 percent from 2011 to 2018. This change may be a combination of additional guest houses, a popular addition in the City, and accessory dwelling units, which have in recent years become more common.
Table II-19
Bedrooms Per Unit, 2011–2018
Bedrooms Per
Unit 2011 % of Total 2018 % of Total % Change 1
Studio (no
bedroom) 172 0.8 622 2.5 1.7
1 1,145 5.2 1,307 5.2 0
2 4,046 18.3 4,278 17.0 -1.3
3 11,772 53.3 13,305 52.9 -0.4
4 4,441 20.1 5,125 20.4 0.3
5+ 506 2.3 506 2.0 -0.3
Total 22,082 100 25,143 100.0 ----
Source: 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25041.
1 This category represents percent change in proportional terms.
Table II-20 identifies the number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit by tenure. Three-bedroom units constituted the majority of housing stock (approximately 55 and 49.4 percent, respectively) of both owner and rental units. In ownership units, those with two, three, or four bedrooms made up 96.7 percent of units, while the same bedroom mix made up only 82.1 percent of rental units. As would be expected, rental units contained a much higher proportion of one-bedroom units, providing housing for those who are young, mobile or do not earn enough to enter homeownership.
403 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
47 Table II-20
Bedrooms in Dwelling Unit by Tenure, 2018
Tenure Number Percentage
Owner Occupied 11,125 100
Studio (no bedroom) 42 0.4
1 bedroom 93 0.8
2 bedrooms 1,721 15.5
3 bedrooms 6,124 55.0
4 bedrooms 2,912 26.2
5 or more bedrooms 233 2.1
Renter Occupied 4,380 100
Studio (no bedroom) 78 1.8
1 bedroom 697 15.9
2 bedrooms 989 22.6
3 bedrooms 2,165 49.4
4 bedrooms 443 10.1
5 or more bedrooms 8 0.2
Total 15,505 100
Studio (no bedroom) 46 0.8
1 bedroom 686 5.1
2 bedrooms 2,200 17.5
3 bedrooms 7,655 53.5
4 bedrooms 2,952 21.6
5 or more bedrooms 332 1.6
Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25042.
Housing Costs
This section discusses values of ownership housing, and average rental prices for rental housing. La Quinta’s for-sale and rental properties range from multimillion-dollar estates to very low-income subsidized units.
Home Values
The table above compares median housing values in Coachella Valley cities from 2013 to 2018. La Quinta’s median housing value was $348,400 in 2013, which was lower than Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells, but higher than the other cities. Its median value increased 10.8% over the 5- year period, which was the third lowest percent increase in the region.
However, the City’s median housing value still ranks third highest in the Coachella Valley.
404 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
48 Table II-21
Regional Median Housing Value Trends, 2013 – 2018
Jurisdiction
Median Value,
owner-occupied units % Change
2013 2018 2013-2018
Desert Hot Springs $121,600 $174,900 43.8%
Palm Springs $267,800 $367,900 37.4%
Cathedral City $179,500 $259,900 44.8%
Rancho Mirage $518,000 $499,900 -3.5%
Palm Desert $308,000 $335,400 9.0%
Indian Wells $604,600 $706,800 16.9%
La Quinta $348,400 $386,200 10.8%
Indio $192,600 $267,900 39.1%
Coachella $137,600 $207,300 50.7%
Source: American Community Survey 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table B25077
Table II-22 shows that nearly a third (32.5%) of owner-occupied units were valued between $300,000 to $499,999 in 2018, followed by 26% in the $500,000 to $999,999 range and 21.6% in the $200,000 to $299,999 range. Currently, 36% of owner-occupied units are worth $500,000 or more, and 31.6% are valued below $300,000.
Table II-22
Housing Values in La Quinta, 2018
Owner-occupied units value Number Percent
Less than $50,000 240 2.2%
$50,000 to $99,999 153 1.4%
$100,000 to $149,999 135 1.2%
$150,000 to $199,999 581 5.2%
$200,000 to $299,999 2,404 21.6%
$300,000 to $499,999 3,612 32.5%
$500,000 to $999,999 2,888 26.0%
$1,000,000 or more 1,112 10.0%
Total 11,125 100
Median (dollars) 386,200 -
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP04
New Homes
While the volume of new homes shrank by 30.6% from 2017 to 2018, the median price of new homes also decreased by 27.4% from 2018 to 2019.5 Although housing starts do not compare to pre-Recession levels, the market has recovered slowly.
5 Ibid.
405 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
49 During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City and non-profit organizations arranged financing for rehabilitation and expansion of affordable housing units at the Washington Street Apartments. The project, located on approximately 11.5 acres, included the substantial rehabilitation of all 72 existing units, construction of 68 new units, construction of 2 new community buildings, laundry facilities, a fitness center, and 2 swimming pools. The Coral Mountain project was also constructed during this period, providing 174 low and moderate income units.
Currently pending residential housing projects are listed in the following table. As shown, approximately 2,822 single-family and multi-family units are either under review, approved, or under construction.
Table II-23
Pending Residential Projects
Development Name Acres
No. of
Dwelling
Units
Type of
Dwelling Units Status
Mountain Village Residences 0.22 6 multi-family apts. under review Estate Collection at Coral Mountain 20 57 single-family approved SilverRock Phase 1 46.6 29 Single-family approved
Travertine 800 1,200 single-family under review
Centre at La Quinta 22 133 multi-family condos approved Desert Club Apartments 0.7 16 multi-family apts. approved Floresta 20.8 82 single-family under
construction
Residence Club at PGA West 3 11 single-family approved
Canyon Ridge 28.3 74 single-family approved
Codorniz 15 142 single-family under
construction
SilverRock Phase 2 30.5 66 hotel branded condos approved Estates at Griffin Lake 30 78 single-family approved
Monterra 14 40 single-family in final phase
Signature at PGA West 42 230 single-family approved
The Peak Mixed Use 0.38 8 multi-family apts. under review La Quinta Penthouses 12.74 8 multi-family apts. under review Jefferson Street Apartments 5.36 42 multi-family apts. under review Coral Mountain Resort 320 600 single-family under review Total Units: 2,822
Rental Costs
The rental housing market in La Quinta includes apartments, townhomes, condos/co-ops, and single-family homes. Table II-24 shows median gross rent by number of bedrooms, according to the American Community Survey. The median gross rent is $1,473.
406 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
50 Table II-24
Median Gross Rent by Bedrooms (2018)
No. of Bedrooms Median Gross Rent*
No bedroom $797
1 bedroom $396
2 bedrooms $1,206
3 bedrooms $1,731
4 bedrooms $2,176
5+ bedrooms not provided
Median Gross Rent: $1,473
* estimated, renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table B25031
Online listings show that current market rental rates generally range from approximately $1,330 to $1,800 for a 1-bedroom unit; $1,400 to $3,500 for a 2-bedroom unit; $2,000 to $4,500 for a 3-bedroom unit; and $2,400 to $5,000 for a 4+-bedroom unit.6 Although rental rates for some units are much higher than reflected in these ranges, they are generally outliers and not reflective of the majority. No studio apartment listings were found in the search.
Affordable Rental Units
The majority of apartment rental properties are offered at costs comparable to the average rental costs for the Coachella Valley as a whole. The affordability of rental housing in La Quinta is not directly tied to the density of the project; rather, prices range based on condition, on-site amenities, location, and unit size. New rental projects in La Quinta, particularly affordable projects, are incorporating more aspects of sustainable design and green building.
There are 28 affordable single-family rental units in La Quinta, all of which have 3 bedrooms. Additionally, there are nine affordable multifamily housing complexes offering a total of 912 affordable multi-family rental units,7
including HUD apartments, Section 8 apartments, public
housing apartments, non-profit senior and family low-income apartments, and Low-income tax credit apartments (LIHTC).8 Five of the complexes are available to residents of all ages, including the following:
Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes, constructed in 2008, provides 80 rental units affordable to extremely low, very low, and low income households. Vista Dunes was the first very low-income multifamily 6 Rent.com, accessed June 1, 2020. 7
Affordable Housing Program, Single-Family Rental Units and Multi-Family Rental Units, City of La Quinta, updated July 8, 2020. 8
LowIncomeHousing.us, accessed June 1, 2020.
407 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
51 project of its size in the country to achieve LEED Platinum certification. The project provides a swimming pool, playground, basketball court, and large community multipurpose room. Vista Dunes offers one- to three-bedroom apartments.
Wolff Waters Place, built in 2009, includes 216 green-built one- to four- bedroom apartments that are affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households. Wolff Waters Place is a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project.
Aventine Apartments provides 20 units for low and moderate income households.
Coral Mountain Apartments includes 174 units for low and moderate income households.
Villa Cortina Apartments provides 116 moderate income restricted rentals.
Four apartment complexes are dedicated to senior affordable rentals, including:
Hadley Villas (79 units) offers extremely low, very low, and low income one-bedroom villas and accepts HUD subsidies. Depending on availability, rent will be based on 30% of the Adjusted Gross Income for persons qualifying for low income housing.
Seasons At Miraflores La Quinta is a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment with 116 extremely low and very low income oneto two-bedroom apartments. The LIHTC gives incentives to builders and developers to provide affordable housing to low income persons. The maximum rent charged is based on the Area Median Income (AMI).
Seasons At La Quinta is a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment and provides 87 extremely low, low, and moderate income apartments.
Washington Street Apartments was recently renovated and expanded and re-opened in late 2019. It provides 140 units for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income seniors, nearly doubling its previous capacity. Thirteen (13) of these units are affordable through Section 8.
408 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
52 HOUSING NEEDS
The following analysis of current City housing conditions addresses housing needs and concerns relative to various segments of the population.
Several factors will influence the degree of demand or need for new housing in La Quinta in coming years. The four major “needs” categories considered in this element are:
Overpayment: renters and homeowners who pay more than 30 percent of their gross incomes for shelter.
Overcrowding: In response to higher housing prices, lower income households must often be satisfied with smaller, less adequate housing for available money.
Special Needs: Special needs are those associated with demographic groups that call for very specific program responses, such as preservation of residential hotels or the development of fourbedroom apartments. State law specifically requires analysis of the special housing needs of the elderly, the disabled, singleparent households, large families, farm workers, and homeless persons.
Future Housing Needs: To meet future needs of local and regional population and employment growth, SCAG developed the
Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which establishes both the projected need for non-market-rate housing and the “fair share” distribution of the projected need to each jurisdiction in each market area.
Overpayment and Housing Affordability
State housing policy recognizes that cooperative participation of the private and public sectors is necessary to expand housing opportunities to all economic segments of the community. Historically, the private sector generally responds to the majority of the community’s housing needs through the production of market-rate housing. However, the percentage of the population on a statewide basis who can afford market-rate housing is declining. The State of California and HUD determined that affordable housing should consume no more than 30 percent of household gross income for lower and moderate-income households. A household spending greater than 30 percent of their gross income on housing is considered to be overpaying. 409 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
53 Table II-25 lists the percentage of renters and homeowners who overpay for housing, based on 2012-2016 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data. CHAS data are compiled by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to evaluate the extent of housing problems and needs, particularly for low income households, based on Census data.
Approximately 36.8 percent of all households in La Quinta spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs (“overpay”). A roughly equal proportion of owner and renter households (36.5% and 37.3%, respectively) experienced overpayment. Among extremely low-income households, 61.5 percent of renters and 78.4 percent of homeowners overpaid for housing. Among very low-income households, 70.8 percent of renters and 85.6 percent of homeowners overpaid for housing.
Among low-income households, 64.9 percent of renters and 69.5 percent of homeowners overpaid. Furthermore, many of these households were actually paying more than 50 percent of their gross household income for housing (“severely overpaying”). Note that the proportions of households overpaying or severely overpaying are higher for lower-income households as a group, indicating that the cost burden of overpayment falls disproportionately on lower-income households and renters. These overpayment estimates reflect the need for affordable housing in the City, particularly for lower income households for rental and purchase.
410 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
54 Table II-25
Overpayment by Income Category and Tenure
Household Income1 Owners Renters
Households % Households %
less than or = 30% HAMFI (Extremely Low Income) 580 870 overpaying 455 78.4 535 61.5
severely overpaying 385 66.4 350 40.2
>30% to less than or =50% HAMFI (Very Low Income) 835 565 overpaying 715 85.6 400 70.8
severely overpaying 475 56.9 220 38.9
>50% to less than or =80% HAMFI (Low Income) 1,375 655
overpaying 955 69.5 425 64.9
severely overpaying 510 37.1 180 27.5
Subtotal: All lower-income households 2,790 2,090
Subtotal: All lower-income HH overpaying 2,125 76.2 1,360 65.1 Subtotal: All lower-income HH severely overpaying 1,370 49.1 750 35.9 >80% to less than or =100% HAMFI (Moderate Income) 755 425 overpaying 415 55.0 125 29.4
severely overpaying 150 19.9 55 12.9
>100% HAMFI (Moderate and Above Moderate Income) 7,080 2,095 overpaying 1,340 18.9 235 11.2
severely overpaying 295 4.2 15 0.7
Total Households 10,625 4,610
Total Households Overpaying 3,880 36.5 1,720 37.3
Total Households Severely Overpaying 1,815 17.1 820 17.8 1 HAMFI = HUD Area Median Family Income. HUD and CA HCD use different terminology/methodology to define Household Income, but they are roughly equivalent. The table above matches HCD’s terminology (“extremely low, very low, low”) commonly used in HE documents to HUD categories, where appropriate. Note that “moderate” refers to 80%-120% of AMI, and thus is noted in two HUD categories accordingly.
“Overpaying” is defined as spending >30% of gross household income on housing costs. “Severely overpaying” is defined as spending >50% of gross household income on housing costs.
Source: U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, CHAS data for La Quinta, based on 2012-2016 ACS.
A distinction between renter and owner housing overpayment is important because, while homeowners may overextend themselves financially to afford a home purchase, the owner maintains the option of selling the home and may realize tax benefits or appreciation in value.
Renters, on the other hand, are limited to the trends of the rental market.
Overpayment among the moderate and above moderate-income categories is a reflection of current economic conditions. In addition, some owner households choose to allocate a higher percentage of their disposable monthly income on housing costs because this allocation is justified in light of investment qualities of ownership. 411 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
55 Table II-26 identifies the affordable rents and purchase prices, by income category, for a one-person household, a two-person household, and a family of four. Affordable rental rates and ownership (mortgage) costs are generally based on 30 percent of gross income.
Table II-26
Affordable Housing Costs by Annual Income
Income Category1 Annual Income Limit Maximum
Affordable
Monthly
Rent Payment 2
Maximum
Affordable
Monthly
Mortgage
Payment 3
Maximum
Affordable
Home
Purchase
Price4
Single-Person Household
Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $15,850 $396 $452 $58,750
Very Low (30%-50% of AMI) $26,400 $660 $753 $97,750
Low (50%-80% of AMI) $42,200 $1,055 $1,054 $136,900
Moderate (80%-120% of AMI) $63,250 $1,581 $1,933 $251,100 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $63,250+ Above $1,581 Above $1,933 Above $251,100 Median $52,700 $1,318
Two-Person Household
Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $18,100 $453 $508 $66,000
Very Low (30%-50% of AMI) $30,150 $754 $847 $110,000
Low (50%-80% of AMI) $48,200 $1,205 $1,186 $154,000
Moderate (80%-120% of AMI) $72,300 $1,808 $2,174 $282,400 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $72,300+ Above $1,808 Above $2,174 Above $282,400 Median $60,250 $1,506
Four-Person Household
Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $26,200 $655 $565 $73,450
Very Low (30%-50% of AMI) $37,650 $941 $941 $122,200
Low (50%-80% of AMI) $60,250 $1,506 $1,318 $171,250
Moderate (80%-120% of AMI) $90,350 $2,259 $2,416 $313,650 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $90,350+ Above $2,259 Above $2,416 Above $313,650 Median $75,300 $1,883 1 AMI = area median income.
2 Based on 30 percent of monthly income. 3 From Riverside County/City of La Quinta 2020 Affordable Ownership Housing Cost Limits. Assumes single-person household lives in 1-bedroom unit; 2-person household lives in 2-bedroom unit; 4-person household lives in 3-bedroom unit. 4 Converts the “Maximum Affordable Monthly Mortgage Payment” to a home value, assuming 10% down, 15-year fixed, 4.0% interest rate, 1.25% taxes and homeowner’s insurance monthly.
Source: HCD 2020 State Income Limits
Affordability of Homeownership
Home values have generally increased in the Coachella Valley during 2013 to 2018 (see Table II-21). Some new and fairly new homes are for sale at prices that are affordable to median and moderate-income households (see Table II-22). However, many homes are out of reach for lower income and many moderate households in the City. Table II-22 shows that La Quinta has a wide range of housing values. The median housing value is $386,200. Units valued at less than $100,000, which 412 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
56 would be affordable to extremely low income households and very low single-person households, comprise only 3.6% of all units in the City. Only
4.8% of ownership units are valued at less than $150,000, and only 10% of ownership units are valued at less than $200,000, which would be in the range affordable to low-income households. Therefore, it could be challenging for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households to enter the homeownership market.
To expand homeownership opportunities, the City coordinates with nonprofit agencies that provide relief to low-income residents and develop affordable ownership units, and assists with securing third party financing. The City also supports the use of affordable housing rent-to-own transition programs; developers who agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low-income households can receive federal tax credits under the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, and lower income residents have opportunities to invest and gain equity in their homes. The City also provides interested homeowners with information about grants and other resources available for home repairs and/or rehabilitation.
Affordability of Rental Costs
As shown previously in Table II-26 median rent for a 1-bedroom unit is $396; the above table shows that single-person households in all income categories could afford a monthly rent payment of $396 or higher and, therefore, should be able to afford a 1-bedroom unit. Median rent for a 2-bedroom unit is $1,206; however, the table above shows that twoperson households in the extremely low and very low-income categories would not have enough income to afford such a unit. Median rent for a 3-bedroom unit is $1,731; however, the table above shows that fourperson households in the extremely low, very low, and low-income categories would not have enough income to afford such a unit.
Hundreds of lower and moderate-income households are served by existing affordable housing and other projects. With the market-rate rental market essentially closed to extremely low and very low-income households, however, it is evident that their major source of affordable housing will continue to be found through income-restricted housing projects, housing voucher programs, accessory dwelling units, and employee/guest houses.
Overcrowding
The Bureau of the Census defines overcrowded housing units as “those in excess of one person per room average” and severely overcrowded housing units as “those in excess of 1.5 persons per room average”. 413 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
57 Overcrowding may occur when a family or household cannot afford adequate living space, houses extended family members, or is sharing inadequate living space with nonfamily members. When more than one family shares a housing unit it is called doubling.
Households with lower incomes may permit overcrowding to derive additional income, or there may be insufficient supply of housing units in the community to accommodate the demand.
La Quinta has 577 overcrowded and severely overcrowded housing units, which represents 3.7% of the total 15,505 occupied units in the City.
Table II-27 shows that 3.2 percent of the total occupied housing units were moderately overcrowded in 2018, an increase from 2.4 percent from 2009-2011.
A higher incidence of overcrowding was experienced among the rental tenure group. Although renter households constituted only 28.2 percent of all households in the City, approximately 10.9 percent of renters experienced overcrowded conditions, with 1.6 percent of all renters experiencing severe overcrowding. In comparison, within owner-occupied households, 0.9 percent experienced overcrowded conditions, with 0.1 percent experiencing severe overcrowding.
Table II-27
Overcrowding
Status
Owner Renter Total Households
Number
% of
Owner
s
Number
% of
Renters Number
% of
Total
Not
Overcrowded 11,025 99.1 3,903 89.1 14,928 96.3
Moderately
Overcrowded 86 0.8 406 9.3 492 3.2
Severely
Overcrowded 14 0.1 71 1.6 85 0.5
Total 11,125 100.0 4,380 100.0 15,505 100.0
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table B25014.
Note: Universe is total households in occupied housing units. Housing units that exceed
1.0 or more persons per room are considered moderately overcrowded. Housing units that exceed 1.5 or more persons per room are considered severely overcrowded.
Special Populations
The state requires that the special needs of certain disadvantaged groups be addressed in the Housing Element. Selected populations with special housing needs include seniors, persons with disabilities, large families, single-parent households, the homeless, and farm workers. 414 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
58 Seniors
The special housing needs of senior residents are an important concern for the City of La Quinta, since many retired persons residing in the City are likely to be on fixed low incomes. Besides affordability concerns, seniors may have special needs related to housing design and location.
With regard to housing design needs, seniors may require ramps, handrails, and lower cupboards and counters, etc., to allow greater access and mobility. They also may need special security devices for their homes for greater self-protection. Seniors may also have special needs regarding location, such as the need for access to public facilities (i.e., medical and shopping) and transit. In many instances, seniors prefer to stay in their own dwellings rather than relocate to a retirement community and may need assistance making home repairs or modifications. Every effort should be made to maintain their dignity, self-respect, safety, and quality of life.
As shown in the following table, 5,883 householders (37.9% of all householders) are 65 years or older. Senior households comprise 43.8% of all owner-occupied units, and 23.0% of all renter-occupied units.
Table II-28
City of La Quinta
Senior Households by Tenure
Householder Age Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Households %1 Households %
Non-Senior Households
Under 65 years 6,251 56.2 3371 77.0
Senior Households
65 to 74 years 3,015 27.1 524 12.0
75 to 84 years 1,519 13.7 326 7.4
85 years and over 340 3.1 159 3.6
Subtotal, Senior
Households 4,874 43.8 1,009 23.0
Total Households 11,125 100.0 4,380 100.0
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table B25007 1 differences due to rounding
According to the American Community Survey, an estimated 896 seniors have incomes below the poverty level, which represents 9.0% of all seniors in the City. The 2020 federal poverty guideline for one person is $12,760. The major source of income for most seniors is Social Security, and the average Social Security monthly benefit is $1,503.9 Therefore, a single senior paying 30% of their monthly Social Security income on housing costs would pay $451 toward housing costs. However, La Quinta 9 Social Security Administration Fact Sheet, December 2019 Beneficiary Data. 415 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
59 median rents are $797 for a studio unit, and $396 for a one-bedroom unit (most likely not a separate unit given the relative price). A two-person senior household would have $902 available for housing costs, but median rents are $1,206 for a 2-bedroom unit. Therefore, Social Security alone most likely cannot adequately cover housing costs in the City.
Table II-29
Senior Incomes Below the Poverty Level
Age Group
No. of Residents with Income in Past
12 Months
Below Poverty Level
65 to 74 years 541
75 years and over 355
Total 896
Source: 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates, Table B17001
Apart from privately owned housing units, the City has several affordable rental options for senior living as discussed previously under rental units. They include: Seasons Senior Apartments, which offers 87 senior units in the extremely low, low, and moderate affordable price range; Seasons at Miraflores, a project completed in 2003 that supplies 118 senior units in the extremely low and very low income price range; Washington Street Apartments, which offers 140 extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income rentals (13 of these units are affordable through Section 8); and Hadley Villas Senior Apartments, an affordable project completed in 2004 that offers 79 units in the extremely low, very low, low, and above moderate income price range. Continued construction of multifamily units will aid greatly in meeting the needs of seniors currently overpaying for rental units.
Numerous senior support services are provided by various organizations, including those listed in the following table. There are also numerous privately operated assisted living facilities and home care service providers in the City and Coachella Valley.
416 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
60 Table II-30
Senior Resources
Organization Services Provided
Assisted living and home care
providers (various private providers)
Housing, personal care, health care, housekeeping, meals Braille Institute Coachella Valley
Neighborhood Center
Rehabilitation, enrichment classes, in-home support for the visually impaired
La Quinta Wellness Center Health/fitness programs, social events, classes, homebound outreach, food distribution
Eisenhower Memory Care Center Adult day center for neuro-cognitive impairments FIND Food Bank Food distribution
Hidden Harvest Food distribution
Jewish Family Services of the Desert Advocacy, case management services Riverside County Office on Aging Medical case management, counseling, transportation assistance, meals
Salvation Army Food distribution, social events, community programs Senior Advocates of the Desert Public benefits and social services assistance, emergency financial assistance
SunLine Transit Agency For seniors and disabled residents: Half-Fare Program, Taxi Voucher Program, SunDial paratransit service, bus travel training
People with Disabilities
A “disability” is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one of more major life activities. Housing elements must analyze the special housing needs of people with disabilities. Senate Bill No. 812 (2011) requires that the analysis include individuals with developmental disabilities. A developmental disability is defined by Section 4512 of the Welfare and Institutions Code as “a disability that originates before an individual becomes 18 years old, continues or can be expected to continue indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual.” This includes intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, and related conditions, but does not include other handicapping conditions that are solely physical in nature.
Physical and developmental disabilities can hinder access to housing units of traditional design, and potentially limit the ability to earn adequate income. The three major housing needs of the disabled are access, location, and affordability. Housing needs for individuals with disabilities can range from traditional independent living environments, to supervised group quarters, to institutions where medical care and other services are provided onsite. Important housing considerations for this group include proximity to public transportation, accessibility of the home and surroundings, access to medical and other public services, and affordability.
417 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
61 Disabled persons often require specially designed dwellings to provide access not only within the dwelling, but to and from the unit. Special modifications to permit free access are very important in maintaining safety, independence and dignity. The California Administrative Code Title 24 Requirements set forth access and adaptability requirements for the physically handicapped. These regulations apply to public buildings such as government facilities and motels, and require that ramps, larger door widths, restroom modifications, etc., be designed to enable free access to the handicapped. Such standards are not mandatory of new single-family residential construction.
A number of disabled persons receive supplemental Social Security Income and are on fixed incomes. Increasing inflation and housing costs adversely affect these individuals’ ability to secure affordable housing.
The 2014-2018 ACS identified 4,722 persons in the City with disabilities, of which 2,484 (52.6%) were persons over the age of 65. Individuals may be affected by one or more types of disability. The second most affected age groups are residents 18 to 64 years (42.2%). The table below identifies the number of disabilities, by type, for La Quinta residents. The most prevalent disabilities are ambulatory difficulties (26.6%) and independent living difficulties (17.8%).
Group homes are listed as residential care facilities in the Zoning Ordinance, and are permitted by right in all residential zones. There are no use-specific standards for group homes, and they would require only a building permit for construction if occurring in a single family home environment, and with approval of a Site Development Permit if proposed as an apartment or similar multi-family project in the higher density zones. This same requirement also applies to apartment or multi-family project for any type of housing.
418 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
62 Table II-31
City of La Quinta
Number of Disabilities, by Disability Type1
Disability by Age and Type Number of
Disabilities
Percent of Total
Disabilities1
Under age 18 242 2.8
Hearing Difficulty 4 0.05
Vision Difficulty 91 1.1
Cognitive Difficulty 130 1.5
Ambulatory Difficulty 0 0.0
Self-Care Difficulty 17 0.2
Independent Living Difficulty * *
Ages 18-64 3,188 37.4
Hearing Difficulty 291 3.4
Vision Difficulty 413 4.8
Cognitive Difficulty 845 9.9
Ambulatory Difficulty 746 8.8
Self-Care Difficulty 380 4.5
Independent Living Difficulty 513 6.0
Ages 65+ 5,088 59.7
Hearing Difficulty 1,024 12.0
Vision Difficulty 420 4.9
Cognitive Difficulty 548 6.4
Ambulatory Difficulty 1,530 18.0
Self-Care Difficulty 560 6.6
Independent Living Difficulty 1,006 11.8
Total Disabilities 8,518 100.0
Total Civilian Non-Institutionalized
Population with a Disability 4,722 1
differences due to rounding
* data not provided
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table S1810 The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) implements a statewide system of community-based services for people with developmental disabilities and their families. DDS contracts with the Inland Regional Center (IRC) in Riverside to provide and coordinate local services in Riverside County, including the City of La Quinta. IRC currently (2021) serves 172 clients who are La Quinta residents.
Facilities and services in the Coachella Valley that assist persons with developmental and physical disabilities include:
o La Quinta Wellness Center connects seniors with Riverside County Meals on Wheels, an outreach program for homebound seniors, and SunLine Transit Agency for Dial-a-Ride
transportation services.
419 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
63 o Angel View, a non-profit organization based in Desert Hot Springs, operates 19 six-bed group homes for children and young adults with developmental and physical disabilities. The homes provide 24-hour nursing and/or attendant care and can
accommodate 100+ individuals at a time. There are 16 homes in the Coachella Valley, including 12 in Desert Hot Springs, 3 in Palm Springs, and 1 in Thousand Palms.
o The Inland Regional Center uses person-centered planning when developing a Consumer’s Individual Program Plan (IPP). The IPP outlines the goals developed by the Consumer and their support team, as well as the services and supports they will receive to help those goals. Many of the services/supports listed in the IPP are funded by Inland Regional Center. However, services and supports may also be provided by other agencies such as the Social Security Administration, school districts, county agencies, etc.
o Canyon Springs in Cathedral City is a State developmental center operated by DDS with 55 licensed beds for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The treatment program at Canyon Springs is designed to provide its residents with work/job training, including formal educational
opportunities and new home life and living skills. Referrals for admission are made by Regional Centers. Each person is assessed and will participate in developing and carrying out an Individual Program Plan. Residents have opportunities to participate in a variety of integrated activities in natural environments at home, at work, and in the community.
o Desert AIDS Project – Palm Springs: Dedicated to providing support, care, and treatment to people with AIDS and related illnesses and education to the general community. The Desert AIDS project serves the psychological needs of AIDS clients, provides case management, anonymous HIV testing, legal
services, a program of protection and prevention, and referral and recreational services.
o FISH of Lower Coachella Valley – Coachella: Provides 2-3 days of emergency food for families/individuals in need. Clients may return for assistance every 14 days.
o Desert Arc – Palm Desert: A comprehensive service delivery agency for people with developmental and intellectual
disabilities; it provides programs to develop or enhance self-help skills, life enrichment skills, and prevocational and vocational skills.
420 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
64 o Braille Institute – Palm Desert: A nonprofit school providing daytime classes and other support programs and services for people with blindness and vision loss in the Coachella Valley.
Large Family Households
The 2014-2018 ACS reported 1,543 households in the City of La Quinta with five or more persons, which constitutes 10 percent of all households. This represents a 17 percent increase from the 2009-2011 ACS (1,319 households). Large-family households generally require larger dwellings with more bedrooms to meet their housing needs, but these households often experience difficulty securing adequate housing suitable for their expanded needs due to income limitations and/or lack of adequate housing stock. Difficulties in securing housing large enough to accommodate all members of a household are heightened for renters, as multifamily rental units are typically smaller than singlefamily units.
Table II-32 presents tenure of housing units by number of persons in the household based on 2014-2018 ACS data. The table shows that large households are roughly equally comprised of owner occupied and renter occupied households (805 owner occupied, 738 renter occupied).
Large owner-occupied units comprise 7.2 percent of all owner-occupied housing, and large renter-occupied units comprise 16.8 percent of all renter-occupied units.
Table II-32
Large Households by Tenure
Number of Persons in Household Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Households % Households %1
One to Four 10,320 92.8 3,642 83.2
Five 577 5.2 410 9.4
Six 228 2.0 264 6.0
Seven or More 0 0 64 1.5
Total Households with 5+ Persons 805 7.2 738 16.8
Total Households 11,125 100 4,380 100 1
differences due to rounding
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table B25009 Multifamily housing rental stock consists primarily of one-, two-and three-bedroom units. Single family development in the Cove is made up largely of units with three bedrooms, although four-bedroom units are also present in limited supply. As shown in Table II-32, there are 3,284 units with 4 or more bedrooms, which exceeds the current number of large families. Citywide single-family construction activity has created a 421 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
65 supply of housing for large families not available in multifamily housing, although prices for larger units tend to be affordable only to moderate and above moderate income households.
Suitable housing products for large families include those with sufficient bedrooms that are near childcare facilities, schools, recreational areas, and public transit. In the current housing stock, 577 units (3.7% of all units citywide) are overcrowded, and the majority (82.7%) of them are rental units. There are 332 units with 5 or more bedrooms (1.6% of total units citywide), and only 8 of them are rental units, so there may be a need for additional larger units, particularly rental units.
Given the lack of larger rental units, programs that assist large families with homeownership would be beneficial. Reduced parking standards for units with 5 or more bedrooms may also incentivize development of larger rental units. For instance, certain affordable housing developments may be granted a maximum parking ratio of two and onehalf parking spaces for four or more bedrooms (La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.60.260.E. Incentives and Concessions).
Single-Parent Households
Single-parent heads of household constitute a group with serious housing concerns. In general, families with single-parent heads of household may experience a higher incidence of poverty than other household configurations. In particular, female-headed households can experience lower incomes, higher living expenses, higher poverty rates, and low rates of homeownership. Finding adequate and affordable housing is a high priority. Special considerations for this population include proximity to schools, childcare, employment, and health care.
Table II-33
Single-Parent Household Characteristics
Household Type
No. of
Households % of Total
Total households 15,505 100
Male-headed households 747 4.8
With own children under 18 437 2.8
Female-headed households 1,433 9.2
With own children under 18 788 5.1
Total Families, Income in the Past 12
Months Below Poverty Level 625 100
Male Householders, Income in the Past
12 Months Below Poverty Level 0 0
Female Householders, Income in the
Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 255 40.8
Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02; ACS 2018 Supplemental Estimates Detailed Table K201703
422 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
66 As shown in Table II-33, there were 2,180 single-parent-headed family households in La Quinta, or 14% of all households, in 2018. Male-headed family households comprise 4.8% of all households, and female-headed family households comprise 9.2%. As shown in the table above, of the 1,433 female-headed family households in La Quinta, more than half (55%) of the female-headed households have children under age 18.
While no male-headed households were below the poverty level in the past 12 months, female-headed households comprise 40.8% of all families with incomes below the poverty level.
The number of single-parent-headed and female-headed family households both declined compared to 2010 (2,026 single-parent households, of which 1,461 were female-headed). However, 17.8 percent of the City’s female-headed families live in poverty as compared to 16.1 percent in 2010.
Many single parents do not have the resources to enter the housing market as a homeowner. Although the incidence of single-parent households below the poverty level is low (1.6% of all households) in the City, addressing the housing needs for single parents may require innovative housing solutions. Strategies need to be considered to provide more housing opportunities to these households, such as new multifamily housing, mixed-use units, and subsidized single-family housing. Flexible educational programs and job training services can help householders obtain higher paying jobs.
Farmworkers
Based on an analysis of farm labor and the diminishing amount of farmland in the City of La Quinta and surrounding rural areas, the need for farm worker housing has declined. Most agricultural land and farmworker housing in the Coachella Valley are located in the eastern valley in and around the communities of Coachella, Thermal, and Mecca.
While the zoning map includes a Low-Density Agriculture/Equestrian Residential Overlay, there is no land designated specifically for agricultural uses in the City’s General Plan and zoning maps. There are also no zoning policies or restrictions specific to farms or farmworker housing.
Based on 2014-2018 ACS data, there were 352 persons employed in “agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining” in the City in 2018, which constitutes 2% of the City’s civilian employed population 16 years and over (see Table II-6). It is probable that a number of occupations classified as agricultural are related to nursery operations or landscape maintenance.
423 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
67 Responsibility for providing housing for farm workers originally lay with the growers that employed the workers. This practice was discontinued, however, due to high costs for liability insurance and maintenance. Low income groups often need housing near work. For farmworkers, this means that housing is needed in rural, agricultural areas rather than urban areas. In the Coachella Valley, the principal housing options for migrant and local seasonal farm workers are family-owned homes, private rental houses, second units, apartments, and mobile homes.
Farmworker housing does not appear to be a significant need in La Quinta. Nevertheless, farmworker households will benefit from rental subsidies and incentives provided by the City for developers to maintain affordable units that are available to all segments of the population.
Extremely Low-Income Households
Extremely low-income (ELI) households are households earning less than 30 percent of the HUD Area Median Family Income (HAMFI). The AMI for a 4-person household in Riverside County is $75,300. ELI household incomes are defined by HCD and HUD as those earning less than $26,200. These households often face significant financial challenges to affording adequate housing and, therefore, are considered a subpopulation with special housing needs.
Table II-34
Housing Problems for Extremely Low-Income Households
Owners Renters Total
Total Number of ELI Households 580 870 1,450
Percent with any housing
problems* 79.3% 62.1% 69.0%
Percent with Cost Burden >30% of
income 78.4% 61.5% 68.3%
Percent with Cost Burden >50% of
income 66.4% 40.2% 50.7%
* housing problems include incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room (overcrowding), and cost burden greater than 30% of income.
Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, CHAS, based on the 2012-2016 ACS.
Existing Needs
According to 2012-2016 CHAS data, there are 1,450 extremely lowincome households (9.5% of total households) in La Quinta, consisting of 580 owner households and 870 renter households. Proportionally more owners (79.3%) than renters (62.1%) experience housing problems, including incomplete kitchen and plumbing facilities, overcrowding, and cost burden greater than 30% of income (overpayment).
424 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
68 Extremely low-income households are sensitive to unexpected changes in income and expenditures, so overpayment for housing could result in an inability to meet other important or emergency needs.
Projected Needs
To calculate projected housing needs, the City assumed 50% of its very low income regional housing need assessment (RHNA) are extremely low income households. From its very low income need of 420 units, the City has a projected need of 210 units for extremely low income households.
Many of the City’s existing and proposed very low-income rental projects provide housing affordable to extremely low-income individuals, couples, and families with children. Extremely low-income households are also eligible to receive rental assistance in La Quinta through the County of Riverside Housing Authority’s Section 8 voucher program. Small ELI households may also find an affordable housing option in Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and guest houses. SROs are permitted in the Regional Commercial zone with a Conditional Use Permit. A guest
house/employee quarters is permitted as an accessory use in all residential zones, and can provide on-site living quarters for a homeowner’s family members, staff, and guests. During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City updated the Zoning Code to remove constraints to the development of ADUs. ADUs are permitted as an accessory use in all residential zones and have some flexibility regarding parking and utility requirements. SROs, guest houses/employee quarters, and ADUs may be important resources for ELI households, including seniors on a fixed-income, single-parents, disabled persons, college students, and low-wage earning workers.
Homeless Persons
The Riverside County Department of Public Social Services completed a homeless count in 2020 for all cities and some unincorporated areas in the County. The Homeless Point-In-Time (PIT) Count is a federally mandated annual count of homeless individuals used to evaluate the extent of homelessness. The data provide a snapshot of homelessness on a particular date and time.
The 2020 PIT Count for Riverside County determined there were 3 unsheltered persons in La Quinta, including individuals living on streets or in vehicles, encampments, storage structures, or other places unfit 425 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
69 for human habitation.10 This represents 0.1% of the unsheltered individuals in Riverside County, and 0.5% of County Supervisory District 4 which includes the Coachella Valley and the City of Blythe. The actual number of homeless may be higher given that many individuals, particularly women and youth, remain hidden for safety or stay in locations where they cannot be seen. This represents a decrease from the County’s 2019 PIT Count (9 individuals in La Quinta). Fluctuations in the number of homeless individuals documented from year to year may be due to actual increases or decreases and/or changes in counting and surveying methods, such as increased coverage by more volunteers or enhanced promotion and awareness strategies of the overall count.
Table II-35 describes the demographic characteristics of unsheltered people in La Quinta.
10 2020 Riverside County Homeless Point-In-Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June 2020, pages 83 and 122. 426 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
70 Table II-35
Characteristics of Unsheltered Individuals
in La Quinta
Number
Percent
of Total
Race
American Indian 0 0%
Asian 0 0%
Black 1 33%
White 2 66%
Multiple Races 0 0%
Native Hawaiian 0 0%
Unknown Race 0 0%
Ethnicity
Hispanic 2 66%
Non-Hispanic 1 33%
Ethnicity Unknown 0 0%
Gender
Male 3 100%
Female 0 0%
Transgender 0 0%
Gender Non-Conforming 0 0%
Unknown Gender 0 0%
Age
Adults (>24 yrs) 3 100%
Youth (18-24) 0 0%
Children (< 18) 0 0%
Unknown Age 0 0%
Living Situation
Woods 1 33%
Vehicle 1 33%
Street 1 33%
Encampment 0 0%
Under Bridge 0 0%
Park 0 0%
Other 0 0%
Bus 0 0%
Abandoned Building 0 0%
TOTAL UNSHELTERED INDIVIDUALS = 3
Source: 2020 Riverside County Homeless Point-In-Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June 2020, pages 83 and 122.
Particularly sensitive homeless subpopulations include veterans, the chronically homeless, those with mental health conditions and physical disabilities, victims of domestic violence, and others. The 2020 PIT Count also identified pet owners because of concerns that unsheltered individuals were not seeking shelter because they wanted to keep their pets. As shown in the following table, of the 3 unsheltered individuals interviewed in La Quinta, one had substance abuse issues, one was newly homeless, and one was a pet owner.
427 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
71 Table II-36
Homeless Unsheltered Subpopulations
Subpopulation Number1 Percent of Total
Substance Abuse 1 33%
PTSD 0 0%
Mental Health Conditions 0 0%
Physical Disability 0 0%
Developmental Disability 0 0%
Brain Injury 0 0%
Victim of Domestic Violence 0 0%
AIDS or HIV 0 0%
Veterans 0 0%
Chronically Homeless 0 0%
Adults Only 3 100%
Children Only 0 0%
Families with Children 0 0%
Pet Owners 1 33%
Newly Homeless 1 33%
Seniors (≥ 60) 0 0%
Jail Release (within last 12 months) 0 0% 1
Results of interviews with 3 homeless individuals.
Source: 2020 Riverside County Homeless Point-In-Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June 2020, pages 83 and 122.
Emergency, transitional, and supportive housing facilities and services can serve some of the short- and long-term needs of homeless individuals. Emergency shelters provide temporary shelter, often with minimal supportive services. Supportive housing is linked to support services intended to improve the individual’s ability to independently live and work in the community. Transitional housing is provided with financial assistance and support services to help homeless people achieve independent living within 24 months. Supportive and transitional housing are often in apartment-style units. If a person or family finds themselves homeless, they may go to regional facilities provided by the county, City of Indio, or City of Palm Springs for assistance. The available homeless facilities in the Coachella Valley are listed in Table II-37.
A recent analysis of Coachella Valley homelessness found that emergency shelter and transitional housing are not operating at full capacity; the occupancy rate was 79% in 2018 despite high rates of unsheltered single adults.11 Lower occupancy may be partially because some beds are reserved for domestic violence victims and youth rather than the general population.
11 “The Path Forward: Recommendations to Advance an End to Homelessness in the Coachella Valley,” Barbara Poppe and Associates, November 27, 2018, page 21. 428 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
72 The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), of which the City of La Quinta is a member, contracted with Path of Life Ministries to operate its Coachella Valley Housing First program that placed people in permanent housing before addressing issues such as joblessness or behavioral health. Program results were positive, with 81% of the 242 people who exited the program in the first year able to find permanent housing, and all participants who exited the program more than doubling their monthly incomes.12 In late 2019, CVAG initiated an effort to advance the goals of CV Housing First through a collaborative approach called the Coachella Valley Homelessness Engagement & Action Response Team (CVHEART).13 The program is expected to establish a formal structure for regional homelessness policies and programs, identify funding opportunities for future projects, and expand multi-agency cooperation and participation. In addition to its own efforts to end homelessness, the City of La Quinta’s membership in CVAG will assure its continued participation in regional efforts.
The City’s zoning permits emergency shelters by right in all nonresidential districts except Village Commercial. The non-residential zones, including Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial and Regional Commercial, are all located on major arterial roadways, and close to transit stops. This allows for easy access to services and transport. Emergency shelters proposed in an existing building would require no permitting other than building permits for tenant improvements (if any). If an emergency shelter were to be proposed as a new building, it would be subject to approval of a Site Development Permit, which would be approved by either the Director or the Planning Commission (Director approval is allowed for buildings under 10,000 square feet on pads within existing commercial centers). The Site Development Permit consists of a review of site plan and building design to assure compliance with the City’s development standards. A Site Development Permit, therefore, does not affect the use proposed, and emergency shelters are permitted by right. The findings for a Site Development Permit require consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; conformance with CEQA; and compatibility of site design, landscaping and architecture to surrounding buildings. The Site Development Permit addresses only zoning standards, and does not address land use. Therefore, the use of the building is not considered, and the permit is based on an analysis of setbacks, building heights and 12 “CV Housing First Program Evaluation: Examining the Clients Served in the First Year: July 2017 to June 2018,” Health Assessment and Research for Communities, September 2018, page 55.
13 “CV Heart: A Collaborative and Regional Approach to Homelessness in Coachella Valley,” Greg Rodriguez, January 2020.
429 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
73 parking spaces. There are no parking requirements for emergency shelters. Program H-5.4.b. has been added to assure that emergency shelters are added to the parking table, and that parking only be required for employees. There are over 380 acres of vacant commercial land in the City (Land Use Element, Table II-3). Transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic abuse are conditionally permitted in Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zoned districts.
One use that may potentially provide housing for those in need of shelter is single room occupancy (SRO) hotels. SRO hotels, as defined in the municipal code, are residential facilities that are rented on a weekly or longer basis that may or may not have private bathroom and kitchen facilities. SRO hotels are conditionally permitted in Regional Commercial zoned districts.
430 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
74 Table II-37
Coachella Valley Homeless Shelter Resources
Shelter Name Type of Shelter City Clientele or Needs
Served
Number
of Beds
Martha’s Village and Kitchen Emergency Indio General 120 Shelter From The Storm Emergency Palm Desert Domestic Violence 20 County of Riverside, Desert
Healthcare District and
Foundation1
Emergency
(seasonal)
Cathedral City,
Palm Springs,
Desert Hot
Springs
General 90 (30 in
each city)
Operation Safe House Emergency
/Transitional
Thousand Palms Transitional: youth,
young adults
20/15
Path of Life Ministries Inc. Emergency/
Rapid Rehousing
Undisclosed –
Coachella Valley
General 12/2
Coachella Valley Rescue
Mission
Emergency/
Rapid Rehousing
Indio families with children,
individuals
300/18
Desert AIDS Project Permanent Palm Springs HIV/AIDS 80
Desert Horizon Permanent Desert Hot
Springs
Jewish Family
Services
18 Desert Vista Permanent Palm Springs Jewish Family
Services
40 Desert Vista Permanent
Supportive Housing Expansion
(new in 2018)
Permanent Palm Springs Disabled Men and
Women
35 Riverside University Health
System – Behavioral Health
Permanent Cathedral City Behavioral Health 25
Episcopal Community Services Permanent Scattered Site – Coachella Valley
Persons With
Disabilities and
Chronically Homeless
40 Shelter Plus Care TBRA Permanent Indio Persons With
Disabilities/ Mentally
Ill
23 Source: “The Path Forward: Recommendations to Advance an End to Homelessness in the Coachella Valley,” Barbara Poppe and Associates, November 27, 2018, Appendix 3.
1 dhcd.org.
FAIR HOUSING
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act generally prohibits housing discrimination with respect to race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, genetic information, or veteran or military status. AB 686 requires that all housing elements due on or after January 1, 2021, must contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule of July 16, 2015.
431 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
75 Under state law, AFFH means “taking meaningful actions, in addition to combatting discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics.”
The City has completed the following:
1. Include a Program that Affirmatively Furthers Fair Housing and Promotes Housing Opportunities throughout the Community for Protected Classes (applies to housing elements beginning January 1, 2019).
2. Conduct an Assessment of Fair Housing, which includes summary of fair housing issues, an analysis of available federal, state, and local data and local knowledge to identify fair housing issues, and an assessment of the contributing factors to the fair housing issues.
3. Prepare the Housing Element Land Inventory and Identification of Sites through the lens of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.
To comply with AB 686, the City has completed the following outreach and analysis.
Outreach
As discussed in the Public Participation section of this Housing Element, the City focused its outreach efforts on community and stakeholder workshops, study sessions, information disseminated through the City’s website, electronic mail notifications, and public hearings.
The community and stakeholder workshops consisted of a Planning Commission presentation (December 8, 2020), a City Council update (December 15, 2020), a Housing Commission presentation (January 12, 2021) a Joint Planning Commission and City Council Study Session presentation (August 3, 2021) and a public workshop (January 13, 2021) attended by more than 15 community members. The City received a variety of comments at these workshops, including:
v Concerns about how to address overpayment by both owners and renters.
v Concerns regarding whether short term vacation rentals are impacting the availability of housing for permanent residents. v Assuring that land inventory sites are provided for all types of housing.
432 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
76 v The difficulty of financing new projects, which now require two or three times as many funding sources as in the past.
v Assuring that development standards, fees and processing times reflect the needs of affordable housing projects.
Workshop invitations were sent to local and regional development entities, advocacy groups, and interested parties via email. In addition, workshops were advertised on the City’s website, social media, and in email blasts to the City’s extensive resident email list. Once certified by HCD, the Housing Element Update will be presented in public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council, with the documents available for public review at City Hall and on the City’s website.
Assessment of Fair Housing
California Government Code Section 65583 (10)(A)(ii) requires the City of La Quinta to analyze areas of segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. The 2021 California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Areas rate resource levels based on access to effective educational opportunities for both children and adults, concentration of poverty, environmental pollution, and employment levels and proximity to jobs, among others. High and highest resource areas are those with high index scores for a variety of educational, environmental, and economic indicators. Moderate resource areas have access to many of the same resources as high and highest resource areas but may have fewer educational opportunities, lower median home values, longer commutes to places of employment, or other factors that lower their indices for educational, environmental, and economic indicators.
As shown in Exhibit II-14 TCAC Opportunity Areas, the majority of the urban area in the City is considered “High Resource”. Portions along the northern and western boundaries are considered “Highest Resource”, and one area on the eastern boundary adjacent to the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County is considered “Moderate Resource”.
The southern end of the City is considered “High Segregation & Poverty”. Areas of high segregation and poverty are those that have an overrepresentation of people of color compared to the County, and at least 30% of the population in these areas is below the federal poverty line ($26,500 annually for a family of four in 2021). Within the City and surrounding jurisdictions, TCAC and HCD designated portions of the City of Indio as “Low Resource,” which have the most limited access to all resources.
433 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
77 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-14 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
TCAC Opportunity Areas
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
434 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
78 Integration and Segregation Patterns
To assess patterns of segregation and integration, the City analyzed four characteristics: race and ethnicity, income, disability, and familial status.
Race and Ethnicity
The diversity index was used to compare the racial and ethnic diversity within the City and surrounding communities. Diversity Index ratings range from 0 to 100, where higher numbers indicate higher diversity among the measured groups. As shown in Exhibit II-15 Diversity Index, the City exhibits a range of diversity ratings. The Cove and Village area, the southern end of the City, the area just north of Highway 111, and an area on the eastern boundary adjacent to the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County have relatively high diversity (70-85).
Portions of the northwestern and southeastern City have lower diversity (below 40). The remaining areas are rated mid-range (40-70) on TCAC’s diversity index. The surrounding areas have comparable diversity ratings as La Quinta, though areas of higher diversity are found in City of Indio to the east. According to the 2015–2019 American Community Survey, over half (57.3%) of La Quinta residents identify as White, non-Hispanic, whereas over half (64.2%) of the Indio residents to the east identify as Hispanic. The City of La Quinta can be viewed as a demographic transition point from the west to east Coachella Valley, with the proportion of White, non-Hispanic population between those in Indio (34.7%) to the east and Bermuda Dunes (58.5%) to the north, Palm Desert (66%) and Indian Wells (88.1%) to the west.
The southern end of the City falls in part of a larger area designated a TCAC Area of High Segregation and Poverty in 2020 and 2021, and is also in Tract 456.05, which is designated a racially or ethnically concentrated area of poverty (R/ECAP) by HUD (2009-2013) (Exhibit II-17). However, these designations are most likely not true for this part of the City due to data granularity reasons, as analyzed in detail below. This area, as part of Census Tract 456.05, is in a Hispanic Majority Tract with a predominant gap >50% between Hispanic and other race/ethnicity groups (Exhibit II-16). More urban areas in the City fall in White Majority Tracts (predominant gap >50%). Similarly, much of the lower diversity areas in the Cities of Indian Wells and Palm Desert are also in White Majority Tracts.
435 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
79 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-15 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Diversity Index
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
436 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
80 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-16 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
White/Hispanic Majority Tracts
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
437 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
81 A close examination of the HCD AFFH maps and the R/ECAP area in La Quinta reveals that the designation is least likely due to demographics within the area, but rather its location in Census Tract 456.05, which spans a large area of unincorporated Riverside County in the east Coachella Valley. As shown in Exhibits II-16 and II-17, from a data granularity perspective, the R/ECAP and Hispanic Majority Tract designations cover the entire Tract 456.05 and do not tell any difference within the tract. Similarly, the Area of High Segregation and Poverty (2020 and 2021) designations are specific to Block Group 4 under Tract 456.05 which covers more unincorporated Riverside County area than La Quinta City area (see Exhibit II-20b). The area in La Quinta under R/ECAP designation is roughly bounded by Avenue 60 on the north, and consists of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community. Based on local knowledge and property values at Coral Mountain and Trilogy, this area of the City is not an area with concentrated poverty. This area will be further analyzed in Income subsection below for any potential for segregation and concentration of poverty.
HCD has not published the adjusted Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA) methodology for California as of August 2021. While no data has been released on RCAA, the national metric may be referenced for general considerations here: RCAA is defined as census tracts where 1) 80% or more of the population is white, and 2) the median household income is $125,000 or greater (slightly more than double the national the median household income in 2016). As shown in Exhibit II-18, Census Tract 456.08 along the eastern City boundary (roughly between Avenue 54 and Avenue 60) has a median income greater than $125,000. Census data reveals that this tract has 89.6% white population that is not Hispanic. The area may have the potential to be a RCAA. While another area to the north also has a median income greater than $125,000, it is in a tract with fewer than 80% white, nonHispanic population and may not qualify as a RCAA. While introducing various housing choices may alleviate the potential RCAA situation in these areas, they are mostly built out with retirement communities and offer very limited opportunities for education, employment, services/amenities, and transit. Therefore, the City has prioritized providing more affordable housing in areas that offer ample opportunities to meet the needs of lower-income households.
Income
The City also assessed the concentrations of households below the poverty line across the City to analyze access to adequate housing and jobs. As shown in Exhibits II-18 and II-19, the bulk of the City has a very low percentage of residents (less than 10%) who fall below the poverty 438 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
82 line ($26,500 for a family of four in 2021), and the central and northern portions of the City as well as the southern Cove area have a low percentage (10%-20%) of residents below the poverty line. Note that the southern end of City, as part of Tract 456.05 that is designated as R/ECAP, shows a higher percentage (38.2%) of residents below the poverty line, but this percentage represents the entire tract rather than just the portion in La Quinta.
439 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
83 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-17 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
R/ECAP and Areas of High Segregation and Poverty
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
440 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
84 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-18 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Median Income
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
441 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
85 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-19 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Poverty Status
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
442 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
86 The poverty status trend saw some minor changes from 2014 to 2019.
The percentage of residents who fall below the poverty line in the northern Cove and Village area and an area on the eastern City boundary (north of Avenue 54) have lowered over time from 10-20% to below 10%, while the percentage in the northern City increased from below 10% to 10-20%. The southern end of City as part of Tract 456.05, showed 42% of residents below the poverty line in 2014, though this percentage captures the entire tract and does not specifically indicate any change within the La Quinta area.
The HUD Low to Moderate Income Population maps at Tract and Block Group levels (Exhibit II-20a and b) illuminate how data granularity affects interpretation. The map in Exhibit II-20a at tract level is less detailed/refined, showing the percentage of low to moderate income population for entire census tracts; in contrast, the map in Exhibit II-20b has a finer resolution at block group level, showing the percentages for each block group, which is a smaller geographical unit than the census tract. Census Tract 456.05 consists of a portion of City of La Quinta which includes vacant land, a private golf club and a private retirement community, and rural agricultural communities in unincorporated Riverside County. The southern end of La Quinta is part of Block Group 4 of Census Tract 456.05. Block Group 4 shows 42% of low-moderate income (LMI) population, whereas Tract 456.05 shows 79% of LMI population. This gap in percentage of LMI population can be attributed to the demographical difference between the La Quinta portion and the remaining unincorporated County area. The larger unincorporated County area skews the percentage of LMI population to the higher side.
This phenomenon also occurs in the Predominant Population map (Exhibit II-16), which shows the entire Census Tract 456.05, including the southern La Quinta area, as a Hispanic Majority Tract with a predominant gap >50% between Hispanic and other race/ethnicity groups. This contradicts local demographic knowledge of this area, as there is no evidence showing a significantly higher ratio of Hispanic population than surrounding areas in the City.
In summary, while currently available data are not specific to the southern end of the City of La Quinta and are inconclusive on the area’s potential for segregation and concentration of poverty, based on local knowledge and judgment, the area in southern La Quinta is least likely to experience segregation based on race/ethnicity or low income, or qualify as an Area of High Segregation and Poverty or R/ECAP.
As shown in Table II-16 of this Housing Element, the City of La Quinta has a vacancy rate of 7.4% for rental units and 5.0% for ownership units. 443 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
87 Correcting for seasonal or recreational units, which are considered vacant by the Census but are not available or used for permanent occupancy, the overall vacancy rate is 6.5%. These vacancy rates are quite low and may indicate limited room for mobility and high demand for affordable units.
444 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
88 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-20a08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Low to Moderate Income Population by Census Tract
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
445 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
89 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-20b08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Low to Moderate Income Population by Census Tract
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
446 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
90 Disability
According to the 2015-2019 ACS, the City of La Quinta has a low percentage of population with a disability, with the majority of areas in the City being 10%-20% and some areas being below 10%. Compared to the 2010-2014 ACS, the northern Cove and Village area now have a lower percentage (<10%) than in 2014 (10%-20%). Small portions on the northern City boundary show a higher percentage of population with a disability (10%-20%) compared to 2014 (<10%), though such data represent the entire Tract 452.14 which also covers part of Bermuda Dunes. Given the overall low percentages of population with a disability and limited space/time variation in the City of La Quinta, the population with a disability appears to be integrated in all communities such that they have equal access to all housing and economic opportunities. The City has a no-fee application process for reasonable accommodation, and assisted more than double the disabled residents between 2014 and 2020 (from 91 to 188 residents) in Housing Authority owned properties.
The City’s Municipal Code Section 9.60.320 establishes a procedure for reasonable accommodation application, review and appeal processes, during which the City shall provide assistance to ensure an accessible process. The City will continue to refer lower income households to Riverside County for home repair grants, which can provide up to $6,000 for repairs including a handicapped ramp (Program H-4.4.c).
Familial Status
The 2015-2019 ACS reveals that the City of La Quinta has relatively few single-person households (<20% in most areas) and a higher percentage of couple households (>40% except in the mid-Cove area and a small area in the southeast corner). The percentage of children in married-couple households is at least 40% throughout the City except for a small area in the northeast corner. The mid-Cove area, the area south of Highway 111, and the southern end of City see slightly higher percentage of children in female-headed single-parent households (20%-40%). Note that data for the southern end of City may not be representative as it is based on the entire tract which may have different demographics than the City area. The household makeup of the City suggests there is likely demand for units with at least two bedrooms for family and non-family households.
Assessment and Actions
Given the factors discussed above, there is no evidence of segregation based on disability in the City, but there is potential for segregation based on income and opportunity to improve racial integration within La Quinta. As shown in Exhibits II-18 and II-19, the concentrations of lower income households are not limited to La Quinta. The City of Indio 447 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
91 to the east has an areas with over 40% population living below the poverty line, which is more concentrated than all surrounding areas.
Areas with 30%-40% population living below the poverty line are seen in the cities of Cathedral City, Palm Springs and Desert Hot Springs to the west, and the City of Coachella to the east, as well as unincorporated Riverside County areas. With a median income higher than the state level in 2019 ($77,839 in La Quinta; $75,235 in California, 2015-2019 ACS), the City is not considered disadvantaged economically (median income is 80% or less than the statewide average), although certain areas in/around the Cove and Village area and south of the Highway 111 are below the threshold. Concentrations of households with similar incomes may indicate a uniform development pattern and need for more varied housing stock. If availability and distribution of affordable housing are improved, it will encourage a more economically diverse community.
As shown in Exhibit II-21, Job Proximity Index, the majority of the City is rated with medium proximity to employment opportunities (Jobs Proximity Index between 40 and 80). One area along the eastern City boundary north of the Highway 111 and the bottom of the Cove area have lower Jobs Proximity Index scores of 19-35. Two areas in the western City have high Jobs Proximity Index scores (>80). In contrast to the TCAC Opportunity Areas (Exhibit II-14), this suggests that access to jobs is not the single driver behind the concentration of lower income households, but rather the type of jobs and housing available and other socioeconomic factors.
The City completed the La Quinta Village Build-Out Plan and EIR in 2017.
The Village area is generally located north and south of Calle Tampico, east of Eisenhower Drive and west of Washington Street, and north of Avenue 52. Projects in the Village area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Municipal Code Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre. The mixed use overlay was introduced in 2016 to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. Per Section
9.140.090.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. The City also amended and completed Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) regulations in ordinances passed in 2016 and 2019. The City intends to apply the Affordable Housing Overlay to all sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Program 1.1.b.), including sites in the Village area and along the Highway 111 corridor. These measures are expected to expand housing options and foster a more economically diverse community.
448 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
92 The City was awarded an Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Grant for “La Quinta Village Complete Streets – A Road Diet Project” in the amount of $7,313,000. This project included the construction of five new roundabouts in the La Quinta Village where pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and automobile traffic exist. The new roundabouts will help accommodate non-vehicular traffic, making roadways safer and more accessible to pedestrians and bicycles in the La Quinta Village. The project also reduced four traffic lanes to two lanes along Calle Tampico and Calle Sinaloa from Eisenhower to Desert Club Drive, and along Eisenhower from Calle Tampico to Calle Sinaloa. This area will be used as space for designated bike and golf cart lanes. The reduced lanes and crosswalks added midblock will provide pedestrians with safer access to Civic Center Park, Old Town La Quinta, and the Benjamin Franklin Elementary School.
The City recognized the impacts on small businesses due to the COVID19 pandemic, and established a $1.5 million COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program. The Program helps provide small businesses with emergency cash flow in the form of zero percent interest loans of $5,000 to $20,000, and up to $500,000 exclusively for restaurants that were open for pickup and delivery orders in the City.
La Quinta residents had access to rental assistance through United Lift, a rental assistance program coordinated between Riverside County, United Way of the Inland Valleys, and Lift To Rise. The program goal was to keep 10,000 families and residents housed. The program provided $33 million in rental assistance between June and November 2020. Eligible recipients were renters in Riverside County with a current lease agreement who are either individuals or families earning 80 percent or below of the area’s median income, or who can document a loss of income due to COVID-19 economic impacts, leaving them unable to make their rent.
449 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
93 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-21
08.17.21 City of La Quinta General Plan
Jobs Proximity Index
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
450 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
94 Access to Opportunity
The City reviewed TCAC Opportunity Areas identified in Exhibit II-14, and identified one inaccurate designation: the southern end of the City is categorized as “High Segregation & Poverty” by TCAC/HCD, which includes vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community. As discussed above, this portion of the City falls in census tracts (456.05 and 456.09) that consist of primarily agricultural/rural communities in the unincorporated Riverside County, and the census-tract-based designations and data do not accurately reflect the portion in La Quinta. This area has large vacant parcels with potential for housing development, and is zoned for commercial and residential developments at various densities.
In addition to the Composite Score of TCAC Opportunity Areas shown in Exhibit II-14, the City also analyzed individual scores for economic, education and environmental domains. Most of the City scores in the highest range (>0.75) which indicates more positive economic outcome.
The southern end of City, lower Cove area, and a portion just north of Highway 111 score slightly lower (0.50-0.75) in the economic domain. The upper Cove, Village and area just north, as well as small areas along the eastern City boundary score lower (0.25-0.50), which indicates relatively less positive economic outcome. Areas identified with less positive economic outcome are found in the adjacent cities of Indio, Indian Wells, Palm Desert and census designated place of Bermuda Dunes. Areas identified with less positive economic outcome (<0.25) are seen in the cities of Indio, Coachella and unincorporated communities in the eastern valley. The area north of Highway 111 scores in the highest range (>0.75) which indicates more positive education outcomes, and the west side of the City scores slightly lower (0.50-0.75). The eastern City is identified with less positive education outcomes (<0.25), which is also seen in portions of the cities of Indio and Coachella, as well as the unincorporated eastern Coachella Valley. There is no data on environmental domain for the Cove area and an area in the eastern City roughly between Avenue 54 and Avenue 60. Most of the City falls in the highest score range (0.75-1) which indicates more positive environmental outcomes. The southern end of City (in Census Tracts 456.05 and 456.09) is identified with less positive environmental outcomes (<0.25). Similar to other HCD data, the environmental domain score is also based on census tracts and may not represent the City portion accurately. The eastern Coachella Valley in general, except portions of the cities of Indio and Coachella, is identified with less positive environmental outcomes (<0.25).
451 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
95 The Cove area is surrounded by the Santa Rosa Mountains on three sides, and the only access to the local and regional roadway network is on the north. This topographical constraint results in further proximity to jobs the further down the Cove the area is, (Job Proximity Index score decreases from 40-60 to <20). The east side of the City generally has medium proximity to jobs (Job Proximity Index score between 40-60).
As noted, the City encourages mixed-use development in the Village area, which is directly north of the Cove, in the La Quinta Village BuildOut Plan adopted in 2017. Future development and redevelopment in the Village will improve job proximity in the Cove area. Comparing Exhibit II-21, Jobs Proximity Index to Exhibits II-18 through II-20 reveals that concentration of lower income households is not directly related to job proximity. These findings confirm the following trends:
1. Jobs that are near housing may not meet the needs of the residents located there, creating a jobs/housing imbalance and lower job proximity.
2. Someone may be able to both work and live in an area with a high concentration of jobs; however, they may still only be able to access positions with low wages and find it hard to afford housing costs.
Existing affordable housing projects in the City of La Quinta range from apartments to single-family homes. According to the City’s AB 987 database, as of July 8, 2020, there are 400 affordable single-family ownership units with two to five bedrooms. These units are dispersed in various neighborhoods in the western, central and northern City. The eastern and southern City consists primarily of private resorts and golf clubs. There are 28 affordable single-family rental units as of July 8, 2o2o, all of which have three bedrooms. These units are located in and around the Cove area.
Additionally, there are nine affordable multi-family housing complexes offering a total of 912 affordable multi-family rental units,14 including HUD apartments, Section 8 apartments, public housing apartments, non-profit senior and family low-income apartments, and Low-income tax credit apartments (LIHTC).15
Villa Cortina Apartments provides 116 moderate income restricted rentals. Seasons At La Quinta is a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment and provides 87 extremely low, low, and moderate 14 Affordable Housing Program, Single-Family Rental Units and Multi-Family Rental Units, City of La Quinta, updated July 8, 2020.
15 LowIncomeHousing.us, accessed June 1, 2020.
452 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
96 income apartments for seniors only. These two projects are located adjacent to the Village area near Calle Tampico & Washington Street.
Residents have walking access to the various retail, dining and services in the Village area, as well as La Quinta Library, Civic Center Park and La Quinta Museum. The DSUSD Adams State Pre-School and John Adams Elementary School are located to the west within walking distance, and Benjamin Franklin Elementary School is located approximately 1/3-mile away to the west. Bus stops at Calle Tampico & Washington Street are served by SunLine Transit Agency’s Route 7.
There are five affordable housing projects south of Highway 111 between Washington Street and Jefferson Street. Hadley Villas (79 extremely low to low income one-bedroom villas) and Seasons At Miraflores La Quinta (116 extremely low and very low income one- to two-bedroom apartments) are dedicated to seniors. Aventine Apartments (20 low and moderate income units), Wolff Waters Place (216 green-built one- to four- bedroom apartments for extremely low to moderate income households), and Coral Mountain Apartments (174 low and moderate income units) are open to all ages. These projects have close proximity to various retail, grocery, dining and services in the Highway 111 corridor, which also offers ample employment opportunities with a variety of commercial developments. La Quinta Park and La Quinta High School are located north of Highway 111 on the other side of Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. Amelia Earhart Elementary School and John Glenn Middle School are located approximately 1.2 miles to the north. The area is well served by Bus Routes 1, 1X and 7 and bus stops are within walking distance of these communities.
In the northern City, Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes provides 80 one- to three-bedroom apartment units affordable to extremely low to low income households. A LEED Platinum certified community, the project provides a swimming pool, playground, basketball court, and large community multipurpose room. Pioneer Park (with a dog park) and Desert Pride Park are located across Miles Avenue to the south. There are two day care centers across Adams Street to the east. Amelia Earhart Elementary School and John Glenn Middle School are located approximately 2/3-mile to the east, and La Quinta High School at similar distance to the southeast. The project is less than a mile north of the Highway 111 corridor. The project is served by SunLine Bus Route 7 with stops at Miles Avenue & Adams Street.
Washington Street Apartments is located in the northwestern corner of the City and provides 140 units for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income seniors. The City of Palm Desert Joe Mann Park is 453 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
97 within walking distance to the northwest, as well as neighborhood serving plazas at Washington Street & Hovley Lane. The project is served by SunLine Bus Route 7 with stops just north on Washington Street.
Within a half-mile radius of the project, James Monroe Elementary School is located to the northeast, Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School and Horizon School to the south, Montessori School of the Valley campuses to the west.
None of the currently affordable single-family rental units are at risk of losing affordability restrictions during or within 10 years of the planning period. Some of the single-family ownership units are at risk of losing affordability restrictions during the next planning period, and monitors sales to encourage preservation of these units. As shown in Table II-52, there are no rental units at risk of conversion during the planning period.
In addition to planned and pending affordable housing projects described in the Land Inventory (Tables III-47 & III-48) of this Housing Element, the City will establish a program to encourage accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and Junior ADUs as described in Program H-2.1.a and assess their effectiveness in expanding housing choices in the highest resource areas.
Disproportionate Housing Need and Displacement Risk
The AFFH Guidance for All Public Entities and for Housing Elements (April 2021 Update) defines ‘disproportionate housing needs’ as ‘a condition in which there are significant disparities in the proportion of members of a protected class experiencing a category of housing need when compared to the proportion of members of any other relevant groups, or the total population experiencing that category of housing need in the applicable geographic area.’ Disproportionate housing needs may include things like overcrowding, overpayment, housing conditions disproportionately affecting protected classes, including displacement risk.
Overcrowding
As discussed under Housing Needs (Table II-27), overcrowding is not a significant issue in the City of La Quinta. As of the 2014-2018 ACS, 3.7% of all occupied units in the City are considered overcrowded, which include primarily renter units (82.7%, 477 units) rather than owner units (17.3%, 100 units). 10.9% of all renter households experience overcrowding. The overall overcrowding rate (3.7%) in La Quinta has increased from 2.3% in 2014; specifically, overcrowding has improved slightly for owners but worsened for renters. Compared to an overcrowding rate of 6.9% in the Riverside County (2018), overcrowding in La Quinta is less significant. 454 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
98 The renter overcrowding rate (10.9%) is only slightly lower than that of the County (11.8%). Households with lower incomes may permit overcrowding to derive additional income, or there may be insufficient supply of housing units in the City to accommodate the demand, especially rental units. Unit size and affordability can be key contributors to overcrowding, and the City may need more affordable rental units of various sizes to meet the need of the community.
Homelessness
In 2020, there were 3 unsheltered homeless persons in La Quinta according to the PIT Count for Riverside County. The City allows homeless shelters in the Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zones with a conditional use permit. Single-room occupancy units are also conditionally allowed in the Regional Commercial zone in the City. Program H-5.4.a and H-5.4.b commit the City to bring its Zoning Ordinance in compliance with AB 101 for Low Barrier Navigation Center requirements on homeless shelters, and with state law for emergency shelters, transitional and supportive housing.
Overpayment
The median rent in La Quinta can be out of reach for lower income households with two or more persons; however, as shown in Exhibit II22, La Quinta has less prevalent overpayment by renters (<60% of renter households City-wide) in 2019 compared to surrounding jurisdictions, which have areas with over 60% of renter households overpaying.
Overpayment is considered a chronic issue that needs to be addressed both locally and regionally. As is shown in Table II-25 (Overpayment by Income Category and Tenure), as of the 2012-2016 CHAS, between both renters and owners, 71.4% of lower income households in La Quinta pay at least 30% of their income toward housing costs. Regionally, overpayment among renters is especially prevalent (>80%) in the north side of the City of Palm Springs, south side of Desert Hot Springs, and adjacent unincorporated areas of Riverside County as well as the south side of the City of Coachella.
The overpaying rate more than doubles for lower-income owners (76.2 percent) than that of all owner households (36.5%). Overpayment increases the risk of displacement for residents who are no longer able to afford their housing costs. Geographically speaking, overpayment among homeowners is more prevalent than among renters in the City of La Quinta, although the reverse is true for the region. As shown in Exhibit II-23, most of La Quinta has a homeowner overpayment rate between 40%-60%, and the area north of Highway 111 has a lower overpayment rate below 40%. Regionally, overpayment among 455 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
99 homeowners is below 80% except a small area in the City of Coachella, and areas with between 60%-80% homeowner overpayment are found in the cities of Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs and the adjacent unincorporate Riverside County area as well as the City of Coachella. The City has included Programs H-1.1.a, H-2.1.b, H2.3.b to incentivize development of affordable housing and has included an action in Program H-5.2.a to connect minority populations to lending programs for homeownership.
456 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
100
Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-22 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Overpayment by Renters
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
457 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
101
Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-23 08.17.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Overpayment by Owners
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
458 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
102
Substandard Housing Conditions
In La Quinta, less than a third (28.6%) of the housing stock is older than 30 years, and less than 5% is over 50 years old. Older homes are typically found in the Cove area. After 30 years homes generally require major rehabilitation, such as a new roof or updated plumbing. As discussed earlier, a 2007 City-wide housing conditions survey found that the majority of 59 units in need of minor or moderate rehabilitation were in the Cove area. The Code Compliance staff track property maintenance and planned for a housing conditions survey in fiscal year 2021/2022. The repair costs can be prohibitive such that the owner or renter live in unhealthy, substandard housing conditions or the renter is displaced if the house is designated as uninhabitable and the owner does not complete repairs. To prevent these situations, the City offers programs that assist homeowners and apartment complex owners with home maintenance and repair costs. Homeowners interested in reducing their utility bills through upgrades now have an alternative to tapping their mortgage for home equity loans. Through partnership with the City of La Quinta, HERO and Ygrene offer a wide array of home energy products at low-fixed interest rates with flexible payment terms of up to 20 years (see Programs H-4.4.a through H-4.4.d).
Mortgage Loan Indicators
Data related to home loan applications is made available annually through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). The data is organized by census tracts rather than local jurisdictions, and thus the following analysis is based on census tracts located entirely within the City of La Quinta (451.09, 451.10, 451.20, 451.2116, and 456.08). Among first mortgage loan applications originated in La Quinta in 2020, 74.3% were made to white applicants. For 19.9% of loans issued, race data was not available. Among first mortgage loan applications originated in La Quinta in 2020, Asian (39, 1.8%), Black or African American (30, 1.4%), American Indian or Alaska Native (6, 0.3%) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (5,
0.2%) homebuyers received a small percentage of total mortgage loans.
The percentages of originated loans for white, Asian and Black or African American groups are lower than the corresponding race distribution of La Quinta. Considering the 19.9% of loans with unavailable data on race and geographical area covered in the analysis, the pattern is largely consistent with the City-wide race distribution. HMDA data combines data on Hispanic or Latino identity within other race categories; approximately 10.3% (224) of 2,181 originated loan 16 The northeast corner of Tract 451.21 is located in City of Indio, which consists of a gas station and convenience store. These commercial properties do not affect home mortgage data.
459 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
103
applications went to borrowers identifying as Hispanic or Latino. The majority (239, 68.5%) of the 349 first mortgage loan applications that were denied were denied to white applicants (including 30 borrowers that also identified as Hispanic or Latino). Nine (2.6%) applications were denied to Asian borrowers, five (1.4%) were denied to borrowers identified as Black or African American, three (0.9%) were denied to borrowers identified as American Indian or Alaska Native and one (0.3%) were denied to Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander borrowers. For 82, or 23.5% of denied loan applications, race data was not available. The racial distribution in denied applications are roughly proportional to that in originated loan applications, except for the variations in American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander groups due to small numbers of applications. Therefore, the denied loan distribution is considered largely consistent with the City-wide race distribution.
In 2019, the origination rate to white applicants was higher than in 2020, with 77.1% of the 1,222 first mortgage loans originated for home purchases going to white residents. Black (1.6%, or 20 loans) residents had a marginally higher share of loans originated in 2019 as compared to 2020, while Asian (1.1%, or 14 loans) had a somewhat lower share of loans originated in 2019 as compared to 2020. The origination rates for American Indian or Alaska Native (0.2%, or 2 loans) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (0.1%, or 1 loan) groups in 2019 were marginally lower than in 2020. Race data was not available for 17.9% of first mortgage loans originated. Of the 262 first mortgage loans that were denied in 2019, 74.0% were denied to white applicants (194 loans, including 26 borrowers that also identified as Hispanic or Latino). Seven (2.7%) applications were denied to Asian borrowers, three (1.1%) were denied to borrowers identified as Black or African American.
Approximately 10.6% of loans originated and 11.8% of loans denied were for applicants who identify as Hispanic or Latino, though these loans are also counted within other race categories. As described in Policies H-1.4 and H-5.5, the City will strive to ensure equal access to lending programs for people in all segments of the population and prevent any discriminatory practices based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability.
460 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
104
Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021
II-24 12.16.21
City of La Quinta General Plan
Sensitive Communities - Urban Displacement Project
La Quinta, California
Exhibit
461 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
105
Displacement Risk
The Urban Displacement Project (UDP) is a research and action initiative of the University of California Berkeley and the University of Toronto.
UDP conducts community-centered, data-driven, applied research toward more equitable and inclusive futures for cities, and contributed the Sensitive Communities map to HCD’s AFFH Data Viewer.
Communities are designated sensitive if “they currently have populations vulnerable to displacement in the event of increased redevelopment and drastic shifts in housing cost.” The following characteristics define vulnerability:
• Share of very low-income residents is above 20%; and
• The tract meets two of the following criteria:
o Share of renters is above 40%,
o Share of people of color is above 50%,
o Share of very low-income households (50% AMI or below) that are severely rent
burdened households is above the county median,
o They or areas in close proximity have been experiencing displacement pressures (percent change in rent above
County median for rent increases), or
o Difference between tract median rent and median rent
for surrounding tracts above median for all tracts in
county (rent gap).
The Sensitive Communities – Urban Displacement Project map (Exhibit II-24) shows that two areas in the City are designated as vulnerable: the northern Cove area (Tract 451.20) and a small area in southeastern City (part of Tract 456.09). Tract 451.20 has 25%-50% low to moderate income (LMI) population (Exhibit II-20a), but the Village area (Block Group 3 in Tract 451.20) has 50%-75% LMI population, higher than the average tract (Exhibit II-20b). Sites 2 & 3 in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II-50) are located within Block Group 3 of Tract 451.20 which will increase affordable housing supply in this area and help alleviate displacement risks for lower income households.
The entire Tract 456.09 is designated as vulnerable, which spans large areas in the City of Coachella and unincorporated County and only a tiny portion in the City of La Quinta. As shown in Exhibit II-24, the portion within La Quinta consists of vacant land only, and is thus not considered a sensitive community nor subject to displacement.
462 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
106
Enforcement and Outreach Capacity
The City enforces fair housing through periodical reviews of its policies and code for compliance with State law and investigation of fair housing complaints. The City of La Quinta regularly updates their policies and codes to reflect changes in State law. The City is set to meet housing element deadlines through efforts from both staff and consultants. The City will prioritize programs with action items on zoning code updates to facilitate housing. The City has included an action in Program H-2.2.a to update its Zoning Ordinance on density bonus provisions according to AB 2345. Program H-2.3.b requires the City to develop incentives for inclusion of affordable housing units in mixed use projects in the Highway 111 corridor. Other programs include assessing affordability of accessory dwelling units (H-2.1.a) and updating homeless shelter provisions to comply with AB 101 (Low-Barrier Navigation Centers) (H5.4.a). These changes will be completed at regular Zoning Ordinance update in 2021-2022.
Apart from zoning and development standards, fair housing issues can occur in rental, lending and purchase of housing including discriminatory behaviors by landlords, lenders, and real estate agents. Typical cases range from refusal to grant reasonable accommodation requests or allow service animals to selective showing of property listings based on familial status, sex, religion, or other protected class, and more. The City complies with fair housing law on investigating such complaints by referring discrimination cases to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. (FHCRC), a non-profit organization approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that works with individuals and government agencies to ensure that fair housing laws are upheld. Services include anti-discrimination education and investigation, landlord-tenant dispute mediation, foreclosure prevention, pre-purchase consulting, credit counseling, and training.
The City website describes and provides a link to FHCRC.
On August 9, 2021, FHCRC provided housing discrimination records in La Quinta during the 2014-2021 planning period. Of the 52 complaint records, physical disability (21, 40%) and sex (15, 29%) were the two main bases, followed by mental disability (5, 10%). Three each were based on national origin and age, two based on familial status, and one each based on race, source of income and arbitrary. The race/ethnicity distribution data shows 40% of the records were filed by persons identified as “White Non Hispanic” and 38% by persons identified as “White & Hispanic”. Six records (12%) were filed by persons identified as “Black Non Hispanic”, and 5 records (10%) were filed by persons that 463 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
107
“Chose not to respond to race (not Hispanic)”. Additional details including case status/outcome were not provided on these records, and thus they are inconclusive to identify any patterns.
HUD’s Region IX Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) provided case records for La Quinta in July 2021. Five fair housing cases were filed with their office during the previous planning period, two based on disability and retaliation, one each based on disability/race, and the other based on race and retaliation. Three of these cases were closed with conciliation or successful settlement, and two others were closed due to no cause determination. All five cases were handled through the Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP), in which HUD funds state and local agencies that administer fair housing laws that HUD has determined to be substantially equivalent to the Fair Housing Act. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is the only certified agency for FHAP in California. Because state law has additional protected classes than federal law, DFEH may have additional case records. A request was made in July to DFEH, but they were not able to provide data as of August 13, 2021.
FHCRC and FHEO were not able to provide specific locational information for cases either because they do not track the geographic origin of complaints or due to confidentiality concerns. However, given the number of FHEO case records and their outcome, the City of La Quinta would have a low potential for any patterns or concentrations of fair housing issues in the City. However, the City continues to work with agencies and local organizations to affirmatively further fair housing through outreach and support and referral for housing discrimination cases (Programs H-1.4-a, H-5.2.b and H-5.2.c).
Sites Inventory
The City extends into the Santa Rosa Mountains in the west and south, and much of the area in the southwestern City is designated as Open Space – Natural on the General Plan and not available for development.
The City is largely built out, and future housing development will occur as mainly infill projects and on the south side of the City where there are larger vacant parcels. The City identified sufficient sites to meet the RHNA in La Quinta’s sixth cycle inventory (see Exhibit II-25 and Table II50). The vacant land inventory only includes parcels that the City has identified as having the potential to develop during the 2022-2029 planning period. Sites 1-3, 7-9, 11 and 13 are identified for lower income units, Sites 10 and 12 are identified for moderate income units, and Sites 15 through 20 are identified for above moderate income units. 464 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
108
As shown in the inventory map (Exhibit II-25), the sites identified for future housing development are located in different parts of the City in various zoning districts and dispersed to the greatest extent possible with available lands, which will encourage a mix of household types across the City. Most of the sites identified for this Housing Element, primarily those located along the Highway 111 corridor, which will generate 655 lower income units, and near the Cove area, will result in 36 units in the Village of small-lot development and housing affordable to lower-income households. Above moderate income units will be built in the southern City on larger lots and will generate 456 units. The vacant sites that are zoned suitably for multiple income categories and will generate 182 units are distributed in the central and north sides of the City, which combat potential segregation and concentration of poverty by providing a variety of housing types to meet the needs of residents in these areas.
Integration and Segregation: Race and Income
Sites in the inventory are dispersed in areas ranging from lowest to highest diversity ratings (Exhibit II-15), although some of the sites south of the Highway 111 and near the Cove area are in areas with lower median incomes (<$55,000, see Exhibit II-18). However, these areas are also High Resource areas due to location within the Highway 111 corridor and proximity to the Village area, and could generate 691 lower income units. The vacant land inventory will increase housing supply for lower and moderate income households in the High Resource areas by 1.147 units, and is not expected to exacerbate any existing patterns of segregation based on race and income.
The City examined the opportunity area map prepared by HCD and TCAC (Exhibit II-14) and identified inaccurate designations for the southern end of the City. The area is generally bounded by Avenue 60 on the north and Monroe Street and City boundary on the other sides. This area consists of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta (a retirement community). As discussed above, it shows as “High Segregation & Poverty” most likely due to its location in a larger census tract that includes primarily unincorporated rural/agricultural communities. Based on local knowledge and data, the area in southern La Quinta is least likely to experience segregation based on race/income or qualify as Area of High Segregation and Poverty. Sites 17-20 are located in or adjacent to this area and designated for above moderate income units. The vacant land inventory will increase housing supply in the southern end of the City, and is not expected to improve or exacerbate existing conditions regarding integration and segregation based on race and income.
465 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
109
Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty and Affluence As noted, the R/ECAP is designated at census tract level for Tract 456.05, which spans a large area of unincorporated Riverside County and a small portion in the City of La Quinta (Exhibits II-16 & II-17). Due to data granularity reasons and local knowledge discussed above, this designation is most likely inaccurate for the small area in La Quinta.
Consisting of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community, this area should be designated as “Moderate Resource” or better, with potential drawbacks being its distance from job opportunities and schools. Sites 17 and 18 in this area are designated for above moderate income units. As the R/ECAP designation most likely does not apply to this area of the City, the vacant land inventory will not improve or exacerbate existing conditions regarding R/ECAP.
There is one potential RCAA in the City, Census Tract 456.08 along the eastern City boundary (Exhibit II-18) with a median income greater than $125,000 and 89.6% non-Hispanic white population. Sites 15, 16, 19, and 20 will provide 305 above moderate income units in this area. Based on the opportunity area map (Exhibit II-14) and local knowledge and data, Census Tract 456.08 is not in the Highest Resource area of the City, is mostly built out with retirement communities, and offers very limited opportunities for education, employment, services/amenities, and transit. Therefore, the City has prioritized providing more affordable housing in areas that offer ample opportunities such as the northern City. The vacant land inventory may exacerbate the potential for RCAA in Census Tract 456.08; however, this housing sites distribution serves to maximize access to opportunities for households that need affordable housing.
Access to Opportunity
The opportunity area map designates the majority of the City as “Highest Resource” or “High Resource”, which indicate areas whose characteristics have been shown by research to support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low-income families— particularly long-term outcomes for children. As discussed above, local knowledge and data indicate that the appropriate designation for the southern end of the City should be “Moderate Resource” or better.
Using the statewide opportunity area map, local knowledge, and indicators of segregation, displacement risk, and access to opportunity as overlays to the City’s vacant land inventory, the City was able to identify sufficient sites for 1,072 affordable units in La Quinta’s sixth 466 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
110
cycle inventory (see Exhibit II-25 and Table II-50) in areas identified by TCAC/HUD as either “Highest Resource” or “High Resource” with the highest Jobs Proximity Index scores. Sites 17 and 18 designated for 151 above moderate income units fall in the “High Segregation & Poverty” area, which is an inaccurate designation as discussed above and in fact the area qualifies for “Moderate Resource” or better.
Several sites providing 655 units identified for affordable housing are located along the Highway 111 corridor, which offers a variety of resources and amenities. Two bus routes serve the area, which provide local and regional connectivity in the City, Coachella Valley and San Bernardino County (a commuter route). The Highway 111 corridor area features walkable streets and neighborhoods, and provides walking access to retail, restaurants, grocery and personal services. There are elementary and high schools and public parks nearby. Similarly, the sites in the inventory near the Village area, which would generate 36 lower income units also have easy access to the various retail, dining and services there, as well as La Quinta Library, Civic Center Park and La Quinta Museum. There are two elementary schools and one preschool in the Village area and vicinity. SunLine Bus Route 7 serves the Village area. These future housing sites affirmatively further fair housing through their proximity to jobs, education and transit, neighborhood retail and services, all of which can reduce the overall cost of living for lower-income households. The stores, restaurants and offices in both the Highway 111 and Village commercial districts provide various job opportunities.
The City analyzed environmental constraints, including wildfire zones, 100-year special flood hazard areas and geological hazard zones, and confirmed that none of the sites identified are within or near any identified hazard zones that cannot be mitigated with standard construction techniques. With the implementation of standard requirements such as site-specific geotechnical studies, the sites identified in the vacant land inventory will not subject future residents to any environmental hazards. Evidence provided by the HUD tables and maps reveal there are no disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, except that the southern City area has an inaccurate designation for less positive environmental outcomes due to its location in a larger tract. When compared with the east Coachella Valley and areas north of the Interstate-10, the City scores higher in the environmental domain. Overall, the vacant land inventory is expected to improve access to opportunities for households in need by increasing affordable housing stock in high and highest resource areas.
467 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
111
Disproportionate Housing Needs
The fair housing assessment identified that there is likely demand for units with at least two bedrooms for family and non-family households based on the household makeup of the City. Among the areas that over 40% of renters and owners experience overpayment, Tract 451.20 is further designated as vulnerable/sensitive community regarding displacement risk. Tract 451.20 has a relatively high (25%-50%) low to moderate income (LMI) population (Exhibit II-20a), with the Village area (Block Group 3 in Tract 451.20) having 50%-75% LMI population.
The City completed the La Quinta Village Build-Out Plan and EIR in 2017.
Projects in the Village area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Municipal Code Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre and facilitates the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. Per Section 9.140.090.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. Sites 2 & 3 in the vacant land inventory will be able to take advantage of the mixed use overlay incentives and increase affordable housing supply in the Village area.
The City also intends to apply the Affordable Housing Overlay to all sites identified in the vacant land inventory (Program 1.1.b.), including sites in the Village area and along the Highway 111 corridor. These measures are expected to expand housing options for various income levels and foster a more economically diverse community.
The City is also implementing traffic improvements including new roundabouts in the Village area, where pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and automobile traffic exist. The new roundabouts will help accommodate non-vehicular traffic, making roadways safer and more accessible to pedestrians and bicycles in the area and meeting the transportation needs of all segments of the community.
Contributing Factors
Discussions with community members and organizations, government agencies, affordable housing developers, and the assessment of fair housing issues identified several factors that contribute to fair housing issues in La Quinta, including:
468 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
112
• Low vacancy rates and limited availability of affordable, accessible units in a range of sizes, especially for lower-income renters, families with children and disabled people.
• Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs including rising rents and stagnant income.
• Lack of information made easily available to all segments of the community on landlord, tenant and buyer rights and opportunities. This may indirectly contribute to discriminatory practices during leasing and lending processes.
Based on this assessment, these contributing factors largely stem from a common issue of limited options and supply. The City identified two priorities to further fair housing: expand availability of affordable housing and combat discriminatory practices through education.
Programs under Policies H-1.4 and H-5.52 focus on information dissemination to all segments of the City population for affirmatively furthering fair housing and combating discrimination. Additionally, the City has incorporated meaningful actions that address disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity for all groups protected by state and federal law, through preservation and new development of affordable housing and encouraging a variety of housing products including accessory dwelling units and other creative housing solutions such as shipping container conversions. (See Programs H-1.1.a, H-2.1.a through H-2.1.c, H-2.3.a through H-2.3.d, H-3.3.b, H-4.4.a through H4.4.e).
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
Constraints to the provision of adequate and affordable housing are posed by both governmental and nongovernmental factors. These factors may result in housing that is not affordable to lower and moderate income households or may render residential construction economically infeasible. Constraints to housing production significantly impact households with lower incomes and special housing needs. To accurately assess the housing environment in the City of La Quinta, close consideration needs to be given to a series of constraints; the housing market, infrastructure, and environmental and governmental factors that impact the cost of housing.
469 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
113
Nongovernmental Constraints
Although housing costs in the Coachella Valley region are, on average, below other metropolitan areas in Southern California, the cost of renting or purchasing adequate housing in La Quinta continues to be influenced by a number of market factors. Costs associated with labor, raw land, materials, and financing influence the availability of affordable housing.
Land and Construction Costs
Land costs include the costs of raw land, site improvements, and all costs associated with obtaining government approvals. Factors affecting the costs of land include overall availability within a community, environmental site conditions, public service and infrastructure availability, aesthetic considerations, and parcel size.
The cost of land is an important component in determining the cost of housing development. Land in the Coachella Valley has been and remains relatively affordable compared to other Southern California markets. A 2020 survey of single- and multi-family undeveloped residential land sales in La Quinta shows that vacant residential land ranges from $99,000 for a 0.12-acre parcel in the Cove to $1.5 million for a 0.47-acre parcel in Tradition. The average cost is $448,493 per acre.
Construction costs can constitute up to 50 percent of the cost of a single-family detached home. Labor costs are usually two to three times the cost of materials, and thus make up 17 to 20 percent of the total cost of a new home. Labor costs are based on a number of factors, including housing demand, the number of contractors in the area, and union status of workers. However, state law requires the payment of prevailing wages for most private projects built under an agreement with a public agency providing assistance to the project, except for certain types of affordable housing. All cities are affected by these laws.
In the Coachella Valley, construction costs for single-family dwelling units generally range between $235 to over $275 per square foot (excluding site improvements).17 Construction costs for vertical multifamily units generally range from $125 to $145 per square foot, based on typical 50-70 unit project with a 2 to 3 story garden style, Type V wood building.18 A survey of regional affordable housing developers determined that the average construction cost for affordable housing units in the Coachella Valley is approximately $317,074 per unit. Costs can vary widely depending on a number of factors, including but not limited 17 Gretchen Gutierrez, CEO, Desert Valleys Builders Association, March 2021. 18 Chris Killian, Senior Vice President of Construction, National Core, March 2021. 470 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
114
to, location, project site, unit size, bedroom count, finishes, fixtures, amenities, building type, and wage and hiring requirements. Other determining factors include site-specific terrain and soil conditions, environmental factors, and availability of infrastructure.
The construction cost of housing may be considered a constraint to affordable housing in the La Quinta area. The City cannot directly control construction costs. Hence, increases in these costs amplify the need for subsidies to achieve affordability in residential units. Through density bonus provisions, the City provides incentives and relief to the development community in exchange for the inclusion of affordable housing into a project.
Financing
Interest rates impact both the purchase price of the unit and the ability to purchase a home. Interest rates are determined by national policies and economic market conditions and local government has no impact on these rates. Historical market trends reveal that when interest rates are high, a potential homeowner’s ability to secure a loan decreases.
Conversely, when rates are low, homeownership becomes more accessible to more families.
The La Quinta market has demonstrated that when interest rates are low, the majority of housing demand focuses on single-family homes.
When interest rates are high (in excess of about 12 percent) for any length of time, only a small percentage of new home buyers can qualify for monthly mortgage payments on the average market rate singlefamily home. At this point, demand shifts to lower priced units, usually multifamily, and construction trends follow.
First-time home buyers are the group most impacted by financing requirements. The currently low mortgage rates (at or below 4 percent) facilitate first-time home buying. Typically, conventional home loans will require 5 to 20 percent of the sale price as a down payment, which is one of the largest constraints to first-time home buyers. When interest rates are low, they are not generally a serious constraint to affordable housing. Further, lower interest rates help support home purchases by low and moderate income households, who may not be able to qualify at higher rates.
There is no evidence that nongovernmental constraints affect the City’s ability to meet the RHNA. Furthermore, the City cannot influence banks, lending institutions or the suppliers of building materials. Although the City will continue to work with the affordable housing development 471 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
115
community to reduce costs and encourage development through fee waivers, density bonus provisions and other means over which it has control, it cannot impact the national economy.
Governmental Constraints
The City has traditionally exercised authority in the areas of land use controls, site improvement requirements, building codes, fees, and other regulatory programs.
General Plan Land Use Designations
The two General Plan residential designations are Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential. The densities of individual parcels are further refined in the Zoning Ordinance.
Under General Plan Program LU-7.1.a (Policy LU-7.1), the City has established a mixed-use overlay that allows for the construction of housing to be integrated in various ways, such as above office space or commercial uses. The overlay is applied to all commercial zones. The mixed use overlay works together with the affordable housing overlay to raise densities to 24 units per acre (not including density bonus). The density ranges allowed for each residential district used to calculate housing at build out are listed in Table II-38.
Table II-38
Residential General Plan and Zoning Districts
General Plan Zoning Density Purpose
Low Density
Very Low Density
Residential (RVL)
Up to 2 units
per acre
One-to two-story single-family
detached homes on large lots; at
the southeastern boundary of the
City.
Low Density
Residential (RL)
Up to 4 units
per acre
Single-family attached and
detached development, both in a
country club setting and in
standard subdivisions.
Agriculture/
Equestrian
Residential Overlay
(A/ER)
Applied to
underlying
residential
designations
Allows continuation of
agricultural activities in Vista
Santa Rosa area.
Medium High
Density
Medium Density
Residential (RM)
Cove Residential
(RC)
Up to 8 units
per acre
One-to two-story single-family
detached and attached homes on
medium to small sized lots;
clustered small dwellings, such as
one to two-story single-family
condominiums, townhomes, or
apartment and duplexes.
472 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
116
Table II-38
Residential General Plan and Zoning Districts
General Plan Zoning Density Purpose
Medium High
Density Residential
(RMH)
Up to 12
units per
acre
One-to two-story, single-family
detached homes on small lots;
one-to two-story single-family
attached homes; one-and twostory townhomes, condominiums and multifamily dwellings. Mobile
home parks may be allowed with
the approval of a Conditional Use
Permit.
High Density
Residential (RH)
Up to 24
units per
acre for
affordable
housing sites
One-to two-story single-family
attached homes; one-to threestory townhomes and multifamily dwellings. Duplex and multiplex
development is the most
common. Mobile home parks or
subdivisions with common area
amenities and open space may
also be allowed subject to a
Conditional Use Permit.
General
Commercial
Regional
Commercial (CR)
Commercial Park
(CP)
Community
Commercial (CC)
Neighborhood
Commercial (CN)
Office Commercial
(CO)
Up to 24
units per
acre for
affordable
housing and
with mixed
use overlay
High density residential uses are
permitted with a Conditional Use
Permit.
Village Commercial Village Commercial
(VC)
Up to 24
units per
acre for
affordable
housing and
with mixed
use overlay
Medium High and High Density
residential land uses are
appropriate. Live/work housing is
also appropriate.
Tourist Commercial Tourist Commercial
(CT)
Up to 24
units per
acre with
mixed use
overlay
Multifamily residential and
condominium development is
permitted with a Conditional Use
Permit.
Source: City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Code 2021 Zoning Code
The residential zone portions of the Zoning Code impact housing affordability in several ways. The Zoning Code regulates such features as building height and density, lot area, setbacks, minimum units, and open space requirements for each zoning district. Development 473 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
117
standards for the six residential zoning classifications and two overlay districts are provided in Table II-39.
Residential land use regulations allow for single-family detached development by right at allowable densities between 0 and 12 units per acre. Single-family detached housing at higher densities may be achieved with a specific plan for individual projects as long as overall density is not exceeded. Single-family attached and multifamily development is permitted by right at densities between 8 and 24 units per acre and these types of residential uses are also permitted in lower density zones under the provisions of a specific plan.
A variety of residential development is possible in the City, ranging in average density from less than two units per acre for lands designated Low Density to 24 units per acre for affordable housing in the High Density and all Commercial categories. If a density bonus is utilized, greater residential densities may be achieved in any zone. Table II-38 identifies the list of permitted uses by residential district.
The Zoning Ordinance also includes Supplemental Residential Regulations, which address a wide range of issues, from how to measure building height, to satellite dish installation and recreational vehicle storage. These standards are not subjective, and serve to clarify requirements for specific uses.
Lower Density Residential Districts
The RVL and RL zones provide for low density residential uses with densities consistent with the General Plan LDR designation (up to four units per acre). Single-family development in lower density zones is allowed through a building permit, following administrative review for consistency with the Zoning Code and state requirements.
Developments requiring a tract map to establish new lots of record are reviewed by various City departments and adopted through Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. Typical conditions of approval relate to environmental quality such as erosion control, storm drainage, and access.
Higher density uses, such as patio homes, duplexes, attached singlefamily dwellings, townhomes, and condominiums, may be permitted in RVL and RL zones when part of a specific plan or planned unit development (PUD), as long as the overall density of the project does not exceed that permitted by the underlying zone. The specific plan is reviewed by various City departments and a determination is made by the City Council at a regularly scheduled public hearing. Specific plans 474 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
118
are typically adopted by resolution and are common throughout the City.
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), and guest houses are permitted as accessory uses in all residential districts. ADUs and JADUs are permitted in any residential zone, and guest houses are permitted on any single-family residential lot. In the RVL and RL zones, more than one guesthouse may be permitted with director approval. The City’s ADU requirements may not be consistent with current State law. Program 2.1.a provides for the modification of the Zoning Code to comply with current law. These types of housing units are described further below. Residential care facilities with 6 or fewer persons, and senior citizen residences with 6 or fewer persons, are also permitted in all residential districts. Congregate living facilities with 6 or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts, except RH.
Development in the Cove, under RC zoning, allows for development and preservation of the character of the Cove, with one story single-family detached dwellings. The Zoning Code also establishes a minimum 7,200- square-foot lot size, which may require lot consolidation in some circumstances. However, as the majority of the Cove was originally subdivided into 5,000 square foot lots, existing lots less than 7,200 square feet are considered buildable nonconforming lots.
Medium and High-Density Residential Districts
The RM, RMH, and RH zones allow an upper range of development density consistent with the General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation. Minimum side yards and setbacks are required where a project abuts an exterior boundary or a public street. However, lot coverage, width, and setbacks within a project are variable to allow for clustering or creative lot configurations, as well as creating space for desired recreational and open space amenities. As shown in Table II-39, the development standards in the RMH and RH zones are not a constraint: front yard setbacks for apartments are 20 feet, side yards 5 to 15 feet, and rear yard setbacks 15 to 20 feet. Given that apartments include parking areas surrounding the buildings, front and rear setbacks of this dimension allow for the placement of driveways, parking spaces and carports, and do no limit the use of the site. As demonstrated at the Wolff Waters and Coral Mountain Apartments, the Zoning Ordinance does not constrain the development of multifamily housing. Multifamily development is allowed in all three zones with a Site Development Permit approved at regularly scheduled Planning Commission public hearings.
475 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
119
The City’s Zoning Code allows for innovation in design standards and densities as long as the overall density and dwelling unit capacity is not exceeded. Residential compatibility standards have been incorporated into the Zoning Code, which governs conditions where higher or lower density uses are proposed than the General Plan designation.
As explained previously, ADUs, JADUs, and guest houses are permitted as an accessory use in all residential districts, including the RM, RMH, and RH zones. In the CR, RM, RMH, and RH zones, only one guesthouse may be permitted on a lot unless otherwise approved through a specific plan. Residential care facilities with 6 or fewer persons, and senior citizen residences with 6 or fewer persons, are also permitted in all residential districts. Additionally, senior group housing with 7 or more persons are permitted with a minor use permit in the RM, RHM, and RH districts. Supportive and transitional housing is permitted with a conditional use permit in the RM, RHM, and RH districts. Congregate living facilities with 6 or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts, except RH.
Residential Uses in Nonresidential Districts
There are development opportunities for residential uses in several of La Quinta’s nonresidential zones (Table II-39). Multifamily housing is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in all commercial zones except Major Community Facilities (MC). Residential uses are to be developed at densities consistent with the High Density residential designations.
The Village Build-Out Plan Area encourages residential development in mixed use projects according to the standards and incentives of the Mixed Use Overlay. Maximum permitted densities are 25–30 units per acre, depending on location, which are higher than those permitted in any residential zone or the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) (up to 24 du/ac). Maximum building height is 45 feet, which is higher than that permitted in any residential zone (maximum 40 feet). As such, the Village Build-Out Plan Area does not constrain development.
As with most commercial zones, projects can be developed in the Village Commercial District that are 100 percent residential in use, as there is no requirement that a project be a mix of residential and nonresidential uses. Development standards specific to the Village currently include a 45-foot maximum height. Residential floors generally range from 10–12 feet in height. If a project contains solely residential uses, the 45-foot height limit does not constrain development.
476 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
120
Mixed use projects consisting of both multifamily residential and commercial/office components are permitted in all commercial districts except MC. The Mixed Use Overlay also facilitates mixed use projects.
Uses may be integrated vertically (residential over commercial) or horizontally (residential next to commercial). Residential densities range between 12 and 24 units per acre, although higher densities may be achieved through density bonuses, including a density bonus of 10% where at least 30% of total project square footage consists of retail uses.
Maximum heights vary from 35 to 60 feet, depending on the underlying district, but heights may be up to 25% more than the base district if approved in the site development permit.
The Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) allows development of affordable housing at higher densities within commercial zones (CC, CP, CN, CR, and VC) and other sites identified on the zoning map. The AHO provides increased and enhanced opportunities for affordable housing development, including maximizing the housing potential of vacant and underutilized sites. Zoning Code Section 9.60.260 describes opportunities for granting density bonuses and other incentives and concessions for the development of units affordable to low and very low income households, senior citizen housing, mobile home parks, and moderate income households. Available concessions may include reductions in setback or parking requirements, modifications of architectural design requirements, or other approved measures that can result in cost reductions to the developer. As provided in Program H3.1.a, the AHO will be applied to all affordable inventory sites, with a density increase to 30 units per acre.
Rooming and boarding houses and senior group housing are permitted in the VC zone if a minor use permit is approved. Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels are conditionally permitted in the CR zone. Emergency shelters are permitted in all commercial zones except VC. Transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic abuse are permitted in the CR and MC zones with a conditional use permit.
Transitional and supportive housing are permitted in the Medium, Medium-High and High Density residential zones with a conditional use permit. This is not consistent with other residential uses, which are permitted uses in the same zones. Program H-5.4.b requires that these uses be changed to permitted uses in those zones.
477 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
121
Table II-39
2021 Residential Development Standards1
Development Standard RVL RL RC RM RMH RH
Min. Lot Size for SingleFamily Dwelling (sq ft)20,00
0 7,200 7,200 5,000 3,600 2,000
Min. Project Size for
Multifamily Projects
(sq ft)
N/A N/A N/A N/A 20,000 20,000
Min. Lot Frontage for
Single-Family Dwellings
(ft)1
100 60 60 50 40 N/A
Min. Frontage for
Multifamily Projects (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A 100 100
Max. Structure Height
(ft) 2 28 28 17 28 28 40
Max. No. of Stories 2 2 1 2 2 3
Min. Front Yard Setback
(ft)3 30 20 20 20 20 20
Min. Garage Setback
(ft)4 30 25 25 25 25 25
Min. Interior/Exterior
Side Yard Setback (ft)5, 7 10/20 5/10 5/10 5/10 5/10 10/15 Min. Rear Yard Setback
(ft)7 30
20 for
new
lots/10
for
existing
recorde
d lots8
10 15 15 20
Max. Lot Coverage
(% of net lot area) 40 50 60 60 60 60
Min. Livable Area
Excluding Garage (sf) 2,500 1,400 1,200 1,400
1,400
(MF:
750)
MF:
750
Min. Common Open
Area6 N/A N/A N/A 30% 30% 30%
Min./Average Perimeter
Landscape Setbacks
(ft)6
10/20 10/20 N/A 10/20 10/20 10/20
1-8
for notes, see Zoning Code Table 9-2.
Source: Table 9-2, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021.
1 Residential uses in Commercial zones are subject to the RH development standards. 478 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
122
Table II-40
2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Residential Zoning District Land Use
Residential Zoning District
Very
Low Low Cove Medium Medium High High
RVL RL RC RM RMH RH
Single-Family
Detached P P P P P S
Single-Family
Detached patio
homes (i.e., “zero
lot-line”)
PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD
Duplex PUD PUD X PUD P P
Single-Family
Attached PUD PUD X PUD P P
Townhome
dwellings PUD PUD X P P P
Condominium
Multifamily PUD PUD X P P P
Apartment
Multifamily X X X P P P
Mobile Home Park C C C C C C
Mobile Home
Subdivision and
Manufactured
Home on individual
lots, subject to
Section 9.60.180
P P P P P X
Resort Residential,
subject to Section
9.60.310
P P X P P P
Guesthouses,
subject to Section
9.60.100
A A A A A A
Second residential
units subject to
Section 9.60.090
A A A A A A
Group Living and Care Uses
Congregate Living
Facility (≤6 persons) P P P P P X
Congregate Care
Facility C C C C C C
Residential Care
Facility (<6 persons) P P P P P P
Senior Citizen
Residence (≤6
persons)
P P P P P P
479 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
123
Table II-40
2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Residential Zoning District Land Use
Residential Zoning District
Very
Low Low Cove Medium Medium High High
RVL RL RC RM RMH RH
Senior Group
Housing (7+
persons)
X X X M M M
Time share facilities,
subject to Section
9.60.280
M M M M M M
Bed and breakfast
inns M M M M M M
Supportive housing X X X C C C
Transitional housing X X X C C C
Source: Table 9-1, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021
P = Permitted use; C = Conditional use permit; M = Minor use permit; S= Specific plan; A = Accessory use; X = Prohibited use, PUD = Planned unit development Table II-41
2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Nonresidential Zoning District Land Use Zoning District
Regional
Commercial
Commercial
Park
Community
Commercial
Neighborhood
Commercial
Tourist
Commercial
Office
Commercial
Major
Community
Facilities
Village
Commercial
CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC
Existing SingleFamily homeX X X X X X X P
Townhome
and
Multifamily
dwelling as a
primary use
C C C C C C X C
Residential as
an accessory
use, e.g.,
caretaker
residences per
Section
9.100.160
M M M M M M M M
Resort
Residential,
subject to
Section
9.60.310
S X C X P X X P
480 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
124
Table II-42 (cont.) 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Nonresidential Zoning District Land Use Zoning District
Regional
Commercial
Commercial
Park
Community
Commercial
Neighborhood
Commercial
Tourist
Commercial
Office
Commercial
Major
Community
Facilities
Village
Commercial
CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC
RV Rental
Parks and
Ownership
Membershi
p Parks
X X X X M X X X
Emergency
Shelter
P P P P P P P X
Rooming/
Boarding
Housing
X X X X X X X M
Senior
Group
Housing
X X X X X X X M
Single
Room
Occupancy
(SRO)
Hotel,
subject to
Section
9.100.250
C X X X X X X X
Transitional
Shelters for
homeless
persons or
victims of
domestic
abuse
C X X X X X C X
Singlefamily
residential
X X X X X X X X
Mixed-use
projects,
subject to
Section
9.110.120
P P P P P P X P
Hotels and
motels
P X P X P X X P
Timeshare
facilities,
fractional
ownership,
subject to
Section
9.60.280
P X P X P X X P
Source: Table 9-5, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021
P = Permitted use; C = Conditional use permit; M = Minor use permit; A = Accessory use; X = Prohibited use 481 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
125
Density Bonus
California law (Government Code Sec. 65915 et seq.) allows for an increase in the density of a residential development when a developer donates land or constructs affordable housing as a part of a project.
A density bonus of 20 percent above the maximum permitted density may be granted if a project includes 5 percent of the units at rates affordable to very low income households or 10 percent of the units at rates affordable to low income households. If 10 percent of the total units are affordable to moderate income households in a common interest development, then the project is eligible to receive a 5 percent density bonus.
In addition, a sliding scale requires additional density bonuses above the base 20 percent. The maximum density bonus is 35 percent over the maximum allowable density under the applicable zoning and General Plan designation. With a density bonus, allowable residential densities range from 2.7 units per acre in the RVL zone to 32 units per acre in the high density and mixed-use zones and specific plans.
Projects that are restricted to senior residents are also eligible for a density bonus of 20 percent without any income-restricted units. The density bonus is not required to exceed 20 percent and is not subject to the sliding scale mentioned above unless a minimum number of incomerestricted units are included.
Effective January 1, 2021, AB 2345 amends the state’s Density Bonus Law to increase the maximum density bonus from 35% to 50% for projects that provide at least: 1) 15% of total units for very low income households, 2) 24% of total units for low income households, or 3) 44% of total for-sale units for moderate income households. AB 2345 also decreases the threshold of set-aside low income units required to qualify for concessions or incentives from zoning or development regulations, and decreases the number of parking spaces required for 2 and 3-bedroom units. Density bonus projects within ½ mile of a major transit stop that provide unobstructed access to the transit stop may also qualify for reduced parking requirements. Program 4-2.2.a directs the City to amend the Zoning Ordinance accordingly to assure compliance with AB 2345.
Accessory Dwelling Units
In 2020/2021, to comply with AB 2299, the City modified Zoning Code Section 9.60.090 pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The modifications ease barriers to development of ADUs. ADUs are 482 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
126
independent living quarters on existing home lots, the use of which is subordinate and incidental to the main building or use. They can provide affordable rental opportunities for lower and moderate income households, including seniors, disabled persons, single parents, domestic employees, and extended family members. ADUs create additional housing opportunities on already developed or developing parcels and can provide a source of income for homeowners. They are often referred to as “casitas” throughout the Coachella Valley.
ADUs are permitted in all residential-only zones and can be attached or detached to the primary residence. Conditions on the ADU require that no interest in the ADU(s) may be sold separately from the remainder of the property, though the unit may be rented (not less than 30 days); that the lot contain an existing single-family dwelling that conforms to the minimum lot size requirement; that the ADU is no larger than 1,200 square feet or 30 percent of the primary home; and must have a minimum of one off-street parking space on the same lot that the ADU is located. Parking requirements may be waived in certain circumstances, including when the ADU is within one-half mile of public transit or one-half block of a car-share station, within an architecturally and historically significant district, part of an existing primary residence or accessory structure, and/or required to obtain a parking permit from the City. The City’s ADU requirements may not be consistent with current State law. Program 2.1.a provides for the modification of the Zoning Code to comply with current law.
Guest Houses
Guest houses are detached or attached units with sleeping and sanitary facilities, which may include full bathroom and/or kitchen or cooking facilities. Standards and criteria for the establishment of guest houses are provided in Zoning Code Section 9.60.100. The purpose of guest houses is to provide free on-site housing for relatives, guests and domestic employees. This type of unit can be particularly important to provide housing opportunities for the City’s extremely low income workforce. Guest houses are permitted as accessory uses in all residential zones on any single-family lot, but are not permitted when duplexes, triplexes, or apartments occur on the lot. A guest house may not exceed 30 percent of the square footage of the primary structure and must conform to lot coverage requirements.
Manufactured Housing Requirements
Manufactured housing and mobile homes are considered housing alternatives, especially for serving the needs of lower-income households. Manufactured homes and mobile home subdivisions are 483 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
127
permitted uses in all residential zones, except for High Density Residential, subject to the provisions of Zoning Code Section 9.60.180, which requires approval of a minor use permit by the Planning Commission prior to the placement of a manufactured home on a singlefamily lot to ensure that it is consistent with the development standards of the single-family zone. Mobile home parks are permitted with a conditional use permit in all residential districts.
Short-Term Vacation Rentals
Municipal Code Section 3.25 defines a short-term vacation rental (STVR) unit as a privately owned residential dwelling such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multifamily attached unit, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings, rented for occupancy for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. Homeowners are required to obtain a STVR permit and business license, manage the unit in accordance with established regulations, and collect transient occupancy taxes (TOT) at a rate of 10% of the rent charged. In 2021, the City reviewed its STVR standards and made modifications to limit permitting and strengthen the enforcement regulations, following residents' concerns regarding over-saturation and lack of management at some locations. STVRs provide homeowners with opportunities to increase their incomes, which can offset their housing costs. STVRs comprise 1,170 of the 25,143 housing units, or 4.6% of the housing stock in the City, and are not considered a constraint to housing.
Low Barrier Navigation Centers
Assembly Bill (AB) 101 requires that Low Barrier Navigation Centers (LBNC) be a by-right use in areas zoned for mixed use and nonresidential zoning districts permitting multifamily uses. LBNCs provide temporary room and board with limited barriers to entry while case managers work to connect homeless individuals to income, public benefits, permanent housing, or other shelter. Program H-5.4.a of this Housing Element directs the City to review and revise the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary, to ensure compliance with AB 101, and to modify the definition of “homeless shelter” to include this use.
Parking Requirements
Parking requirements in the City of La Quinta, shown in Table II-43, are typical for a city of its size with resort-oriented characteristics. The parking requirements are based on unit size for market housing, and are permitted to be reduced based on alternative analysis methodology. 484 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
128
Additionally, the parking requirements for special needs uses are relatively minimal and facilitate the construction of such uses.
Reductions in required parking spaces are often a concession granted to affordable housing developers through the City’s density bonus provisions. Overall, the parking requirements do not directly constrain the development of housing.
Table II-43
Parking Requirements for Residential Uses
Land Use Minimum Off-Street
Parking Spaces
Guest Spaces
Single-Family Detached,
Single-Family Attached
and Duplex
2 spaces per unit in a
garage
Tandem garages allowed in
RC zone
0.5 guest space per unit if
no on-street parking is
available
Mobile Home Park 2 covered spaces per unit
(tandem permitted)
0.5 guest space per unit
Apartments, townhomes, and condominiums:
(1) Studio 1 covered space per unit 0.5 guest space per unit (2) One- and TwoBedrooms 2 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit (3) Three or More
Bedrooms
3 covered spaces per unit,
plus 0.5 covered space per
each bedroom over three
0.5 guest space per unit
Employee Quarters 1 covered or uncovered
space. This space shall not
be tandem.
Senior Housing (excluding
single family units)
1 covered space per unit 0.5 guest spaces per unit
Senior Group Housing,
Senior Citizen Hotel, and
Congregate Care Facility
0.5 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit
Source: Table 9-11, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021
Subdivision Improvement Requirements
The City maintains subdivision improvement requirements that contribute to the cost of housing. In many cases, a developer may be required to provide any or all of the required improvements within a subdivision or a single residential project. Although the provision of these improvements or actions required to meet subdivision requirements may cumulatively add costs to the provision of housing, they are not considered a deterrent, as they are required throughout California with public safety as the underlying factor. Subdivision regulations are provided in Municipal Code Title 13; pertinent improvements include:
485 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
129
• Full-width street improvements for all internal subdivision streets and alleys shall be installed;
• Where a subdivision borders a public street, the developer shall provide half-width right-of-way improvements, plus one
additional travel lane on the opposite side of the centerline if it does not already exist;
• Additional rights-of-way or easements shall be provided, where necessary, to accommodate roadway slopes, drainage
structures, bicycle or equestrian paths and trails, and other facilities related to subdivision development;
• Minimum landscape setback widths shall be 50 feet from Highway 111, 20 feet from other arterial streets, 20 feet from primary arterial streets, 10 feet from secondary arterial streets, and 10 feet from collector streets;
• The size and configuration of streets shall comply with Exhibits II-2 and II-3, as amended, of the General Plan circulation element.
Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum curb radius of 45 feet for private streets and 38 feet for public streets;
• Private streets are limited to 36 feet in width when parking is double loaded, 32 feet when single loaded;
• Sidewalks are required to be provided on both sides of the street within public rights-of-way of all General Plan designated arterial and collector streets, for local streets in residential areas and in areas designated rural residential overlay where densities exceed 3 du/ac;
• Transit facilities, such as bus turnouts and covered bus shelters and benches, are required if a bus stop occurs adjacent to the development site, on General Plan designated arterial and collector streets;
• Street width transitions, pavement elevation transitions and other incidental work deemed necessary for public safety may be required to ensure that new construction is safely integrated with existing improvements;
• Improvements shall include traffic signs, channelization markings/devices, street name signs, medians, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters;
• The developer shall provide improvements connecting the subdivision to the domestic water supply and distribution system operated by the Coachella Valley Water District, and is required to connect to an existing sewer collection system;
• Prior to the completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the subdivision, the subdivider shall install traffic-control devices and street name signs along access roads to the homes or buildings.
486 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
130
Local Processing and Permit Procedures
The cost of holding land by a developer during the evaluation and review process is frequently cited by builders as a contributing factor to the high cost of housing. The California Government Code establishes permitted time periods for local agencies to review and act upon private development proposals. Typical local development application processing times identified in Table II-44 reflect both single- and multifamily uses. State-imposed time restrictions are identified in Table II-45.
Table II-44
Local Development Processing Times
Item
Typical Length of Time
From Submittal to Public Hearing
Site Development Permit 9–12 weeks
Conditional Use Permit 8–10 weeks
Tentative Tract Map 10–12 weeks
Variance 8–10 weeks
Zoning Amendments or Zone Change 9–12 weeks
General Plan Amendment 12–16 weeks
Specific Plan 12–16 weeks
Environmental Documentation Runs with application
Source: City of La Quinta 2021
Table II-45
State Development Processing Time Limits
Item State Maximum
General Plan Amendment None
Zone Change None
Subdivision Action on Tentative Map 50 Days
Environmental Documentation/CEQA
Review of Application for Completeness 30 Days
Determination of NEG DEC or EIR
Requirement 1
30 Days
Completion of NEG DEC Requirement 105 Days
Certification of Final EIR 1 Year
Source: California Permit Streamlining Act, 1977 1
The City attempts to process the Negative Declaration so that it runs with application La Quinta’s City Council directed, during the last Housing Element cycle, that staff look at opportunities for development streamlining. The original Zoning Code changes were brought forward after review by a specially formed committee, which proposed a wide range of changes, many focused on moving review and approval authority to staff level decisions, or to the Planning Commission rather than the City Council. 487 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
131
This effort included Site Development Permits and other permits, which now can be approved by staff under specific circumstances, and a change in permitted and conditionally permitted uses that removed conditional use permits from a number of land uses in varying zones.
Since the original amendments, the City annually completes a “Code Tune Up,” which includes specific Zoning Code items that have arisen through each year. As a result of these processing changes, the City’s entitlement process is one of the most efficient in the Coachella Valley.
Site Development Permit
The purpose of the site development permit (SDP) process is to review detailed plans for proposed development projects to ensure that the standards of the Zoning Code, including permitted uses, development standards and supplemental regulations, are satisfied. If the proposed project is part of a previously adopted specific plan, the review and approval of SDP application may be streamlined as called for in the specific plan. The SDP process enables the Planning Commission to review the site plan, architectural, lighting and landscape plans, and related development plans. The Planning Commission does not exercise discretionary review over the proposed land use; the focus on the SDP is on issues of site planning and design. The findings for a Site Development Permit require consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; conformance with CEQA; and compatibility of site design, landscaping and architecture to surrounding buildings.
A SDP may take a minimum of 9 weeks for review, but the process could take as long as 3 months, or longer, if unforeseen complications arise.
To reduce the amount of time required for plan review, the City provides the opportunity for a conceptual design review (sometimes referred to as a pre-application review) prior to formal application submittal to give the applicant information on City requirements and project feedback prior to committing to the application process. This conceptual review can save the applicant both time and money, making the proposed development more cost effective.
Minor Use Permit
A Minor Use Permit (MUP) is required for the following residential land uses: senior group housing (7+ persons) in RM, RMH, and RH zones; timeshare facilities in all residential zones; and manufactured homes on single-family lots. Most MUPs are administratively approved by Planning Division staff. On rare occasions, the project may be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing to ensure that it is consistent with the development standards in single-family zones.
488 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
132
Conditional Use Permit
A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for congregate care facilities in any residential designation; mobile home parks in any residential designation; supportive and transitional housing in RM, RMH, and RH zones; multifamily housing in non-residential zones (except affordable land inventory sites which will be subject to the AHO (see Program 3.1.a), which allows multifamily projects by right); SRO hotels in the CR zone; and transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic violence in the CR and MC zones.
The requirement for a CUP requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission. However, a CUP is often processed concurrently with an SDP; therefore, no additional time is required for the processing of the CUP.
Typical findings required to approve a CUP are consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, consistency with the Zoning Code, compliance with CEQA, and certification that the proposed project is neither detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the public nor injurious to adjacent uses. The most common specific conditions of approval relate to mitigating environmental impacts such as erosion, storm water runoff, and traffic. These conditions are necessary to protect environmental integrity and public health and safety and are not considered a constraint to housing development. Discussions with affordable housing developers have consistently indicated that the City’s CUP process does not inhibit the process or cost of building affordable housing. With the inclusion of the AHO on all affordable housing sites identified in Table II-51, there will be no need for Conditional Use Permits, and this constraint will be eliminated.
Specific Plan
Specific plans are unique regulations designed to provide more flexibility than permitted through the Zoning Code. The processing of a specific plan can add 12 weeks to the project schedule. However, the additional entitlement rights, flexibility in design and use, and infrastructure negotiations obtained through the specific plan process generally outweigh the impacts of the additional time expenditure.
Specific plans must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a public hearing. In La Quinta, specific plans are adopted by resolution. The required findings for approval are consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan; certification that the 489 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
133
project does not create conditions that are detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare; and proof that uses are compatible with nearby uses and the property is suitable for the proposed project.
The City allows the concurrent processing of applications to accelerate the process. For example, for a specific plan that also requires a CUP, both permits would be processed at the same time so no additional review time is necessary.
Overall, the processing periods and procedures are not considered a constraint to the production of housing by the development community. The City processes residential projects within statutory time frames. The processing period is typically expedited for projects within adopted specific plan areas, as environmental review has been conducted and standards have been imposed, e.g., exactions and payment schedules, design, etc., for the entire area and in itself does not significantly impact housing construction costs.
Permitting Mixed Use Development
Mixed use development can provide a lively, walkable, and convenient living and visiting experience. Mixed Use is allowed in most commercial zones in the City. The City has not determined any conditions of approval specific to mixed use development; conditions are determined on a case-by-case basis, reflecting the context and design of each project.
Affordable housing developers in the area have indicated that the process in La Quinta has not posed a constraint to affordable housing projects.
Development and Processing Fees
Development fees and other assessments cover the costs for infrastructure, environmental protection, public services, and utilities incurred by residential development. These fees impact the cost of housing and may, therefore, reduce the ability for unassisted marketrate housing to provide units affordable to low income households.
The City describes current fees and exactions that are applicable to housing development projects on its website, consistent with Government Code §65940.1(a)(1)(A). The City imposes Developer Impact Fees on new development to fund the expansion and/or construction of public facilities, such as fire stations and parks and recreation facilities, as they are required and demanded. Government Code Section 66001 requires jurisdictions to identify the purpose and use of impact fees and determine whether there is a reasonable relationship between the use of a fee and type of development upon 490 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
134
which it is imposed, the need for the facility and type of development on which the fee is imposed, and the fee amount and the public facility cost attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
Current City developer impact fees (Table II-46) are based on the City’s “Development Impact Fee Study” dated September 23, 2019 and adopted February 4, 2020, which demonstrates that reasonable relationships between development, public facilities, and fees exist.
The City also charges fees for application and permit processing, plan checks, environmental analyses, and special studies. Some fees are a flat rate, and some require additional payment to cover costs of additional analysis by City staff and/or third party service providers. Planning fees are generally collected at the outset of the application process; others, like building fees, are collected at permit issuance. In addition to City fees and assessments, developers of new dwellings are obligated to pay fees imposed by other government agencies, such as Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees, Fish and Game fees, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), and other special district assessments, as applicable.
Table II-47 presents an overview of City fees for an average 1,500- square-foot tract home with a two-car garage in a low density subdivision and an average 950-square-foot multifamily home with a two-car garage. Table II-48 identifies fees for various planning actions, such as zoning changes, tentative tract maps, and conditional use permits. Based on the fees presented in these tables, and the average cost of building a single family home in the City ($386,200), the development fees per unit would be about $38,613 per unit, or 10% of the building cost. Given that the City’s fee schedule and development impact fees are consistent with those of other Coachella Valley cities, and that affordable housing projects are often exempted from fees, the costs associated with City fees are not considered a constraint to the development of affordable housing.
In addition to these fees, all residential development in La Quinta and elsewhere in California is required to pay the State-mandated school impact fee, which varies by school district and adjusts from year to year.
For residential development, the school impact fee is currently $3.79 per square foot in the Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) and $4.08 per square foot in the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD). The City has no control over this fee, and as it is charged in all cities, it cannot be considered a constraint on development in La Quinta. 491 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
135
While the fees charged by the City add to the cost of housing and, therefore, are a constraint to the provision of affordable housing, infrastructure improvements and processing must be paid. Instead of offering fee reductions or waivers for affordable housing projects, the City offers other incentives to promote infill or affordable housing development through Zoning Code Section 9.60.260, which allows density bonuses for affordable housing and concessions that may include a waiver or reduction in site development standards, or a modification that can result in actual cost savings to the developer. A comparison of the City’s fees with other communities in the Coachella Valley indicates that the City generally charges comparable fees to other cities.
Table II-46
Impact Fees Per Unit of Development
Land Use Type Development Units Total Fee6
Residential (SFD) 1 Dwelling Unit $9,380
Residential (SFA) 2 Dwelling Unit $7,719
Residential (MFO) 3 Dwelling Unit $6,113
Office/Hospital 1,000 SF $7,589
General Commercial 1,000 SF $9,191
Tourist Commercial/Lodging Room4 $2,864
Source: City of La Quinta, effective July 1, 2020
1 Residential-single-family detached. 2 Residential-single-family attached 3 Residential-multi-family and other 4 Guest room or suite 5 Net Acre 6 Includes fees for park improvements, community/cultural, library, Civic Center, maintenance facilities, fire, and transportation.
492 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
136
Table II-47
Development Fees for Typical Single-Family and Multifamily Homes Type of Fee
Cost Per Unit
Multifamily 1 Single-Family 2
Building Fees (includes permit and plan check)
New Construction
Permit
Plan Check
$1,855.18
$1,311.69
$2,389.24
$1,585.99
Mechanical4 $104.64 $104.64
Plumbing5 $228.07 $308.56
Electrical $214.13 $233.45
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program
($0.50 or valuation x 0.00013)8 $24 $38.99
Grading $148.12 $148.12
Other Fees
Development Impact Fee $6,113 $9,380
Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan 3 $571 $1,371
TUMF7 $1,330 $2,310
CVWD Sewer-New Connection Fee $4,851 $4,851
CVWD Water - New Connection Fee6 $3,600 $3,600
Fish and Game Fee (unfinished lot)
Negative Declaration–flat $3,220 fee $3,220 $3,220
Art in Public Places (Total Value) Based
on project valuation charged at onequarter of 1 percent of anything over $200,000 or $20 minimum
$20 $250
Quimby fees (if in-lieu of land
dedication—fee payment only option
for tracts of <50 lots/units)
Based on per-acre
FMV of land
Based on per-acre
FMV of land
Total $23,591 $29,791
Source: City of La Quinta 2021
1 Calculated on a 950-square-foot unit valued at $181,030 (average value of single-family attached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 2 Calculated on a 1,500-square-foot home valued at $299,933 (average value of single-family detached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 3 $1,371/unit at 0–8 DU/AC; $571/unit at 8.1–14 DU/AC; and $254/unit at >14 DU/AC; fees are passed through to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 4 Assumes 1 furnace, 1 refrigeration unit, 1 cooling unit 5 Assumes plumbing fixtures (MF unit = 5 fixtures, SF unit = 8 fixtures), water heater, installation of water piping, sewer connection 6
Connection and meter installation (assumes 1-inch pipe, 1-inch backflow device, and ¾-inch meter) 7 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee passed through to CVAG 8 SMIP fees are passed through to the CA Department of Conservation 493 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
137
Table II-48
Planning Department Fee Schedule
Item/Type Permit Base Fee*
Conditional Use Permit
Planned Unit Dev.
Amendment
Time Extension
$6,413
$6,413
$3,126
$1,691
Site Development Permit
Amendment
Time Extensions
Planning Commission
Administrative
Modification by Applicant
$4,669
$1,691
$8,909
$7,621
$400
Development Agreement $3,327
Minor Adjustment $400
Variance $2,415
Minor Use Permit
Amendment
$400
$400
Final Landscape Plan $1,771
Housing SB 330 Application Review $1,288
Conceptual Design Review $2,254
Street Name Change $1,852
Historical Structures
Landmark Designation/Cert of Appropriateness $1,320
General Plan Amendment $10,465
Specific Plan $10,680
Amendment $4,776
Temporary Use Permit- Minor, Standard
Minor, Requiring Addl. Effort
Major, Standard
Major, Requiring Addl. Effort
$400
$400
$2,093
$2,093
Zoning
Certificate of Compliance $505
Change of Zone $9,392
Zoning Text Amendment $9,445
Director’s Determination $405
Letter, Basic Property Info $263
Letter, Addl. Research Required $1,369
Sign Permit
A-Frame Sign Permit
Sign Program
Sign Program Amendment
$355
$0
$2,844
$966
Tentative Parcel Map
Waiver
Amendment
Revision
Time Extension
Amended Final Parcel Map
$5,045
$1,369
$3,005
$3,005
$966
$4,025
494 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
138
Table II-48
Planning Department Fee Schedule
Item/Type Permit Base Fee*
Tentative Tract Map
Revision
Amendment
Time Extension (CC or PC)
Time Extension (Admin)
Tentative Condominium Map
Amended Final Tract Map
$8,372
$3,971
$3,971
$1,852
$1,047
$8,372
$6,440
Appeals $1,500
Environmental Review
Environmental Assessment
Recordation of Exemption
Initial Study (ND/MND)
Environmental Impact Report
$483
$161
$3,220
$8,855
Zoning Clearance – Planning Plan Check
Alteration/Addition – Resid.
New Construction – SF Resid.
New Construction – 2-4 Units
New Construction – 5+ Units
New Construction – non-resid.
Alteration/Addition – non-resid.
$81
$161
$242
$644
$322
$161
Source: City of La Quinta, adopted July 21, 2020
* In addition to the fees identified here, the City will pass through to the applicant any fees imposed by other agencies and any discrete costs incurred from the use of outside service providers required to process the specific application.
Building Codes and Enforcement
The City of La Quinta has adopted the following State Codes: 2019 California Building Code, 2019 California Mechanical Code, 2019 California Plumbing Code, 2019 California Energy Code, and the 2019 California Electrical Code. In addition, the City enforces the 2019 California Fire Code, Residential Code, and Green Building Standards Code.
Overall, the Building Codes adopted by the City of La Quinta do not pose any special constraints on the production or cost of housing. The City has not made substantive amendments to the code that would adversely affect housing.
The City of La Quinta enforces the Health and Safety Code, as it pertains to housing, which provides minimum health and safety standards for the maintenance of the existing housing supply. These standards are intended to provide for safe and sanitary housing that is fit for human habitation. The enforcement of the Health and Safety Code is normally handled on a complaint-response basis.
495 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
139
The most common housing-related problem is illegal additions/garage conversions. Warnings are issued with a referral to the City and other agencies for remediation assistance. The Housing Code mandates that health and safety deficiencies be corrected in accordance with construction standards that were in effect at the time the structure was built. In cases where property owners refuse to correct deficiencies, enforcement of the Housing Code relies on civil sanctions.
Constraints to the Provision of Housing for Persons with Disabilities State law, per Senate Bill 520, requires that in addition to an analysis of special housing needs for persons with disabilities, the Housing Element must analyze potential governmental constraints to the development, improvement and maintenance of housing for persons with disabilities.
Programs must be included to remove constraints to providing adequate housing for persons with disabilities.
The City maintains general processes for individuals with disabilities to make requests for reasonable accommodation through Section
9.60.320 of the Zoning Code, the permit processing process, and building codes. A reasonable accommodation request is reviewed and approved by the Director, based on the following findings:
a. Whether the subject property will be used by an individual with disabilities protected under fair housing laws;
b. Whether the requested accommodation is necessary to make housing available to an individual with disabilities protected under fair housing laws;
c. Whether the requested accommodation would impose undue financial or administrative burdens on the city;
d. Whether the request for accommodation would require a fundamental alteration in the nature of a city program or law; e. Potential impacts on surrounding land uses;
f. Alternative reasonable accommodations that may provide an equivalent level of benefit;
The City’s process is administrative, and does not result in a constraint for persons requiring accommodation.
Congregate living facilities with six or fewer persons are permitted by right in all residential zones except High Density; congregate care facilities with seven or more are permitted with a conditional use permit in all residential zones. Furthermore, residential care facilities and senior citizen residences of six or fewer persons are permitted in all residential zones. Senior homes of more than six are permitted subject to a Minor Use Permit in the RM, RMH, RH, and VC zones.
496 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
140
The Zoning Code also includes provisions for the reduction of parking requirements for affordable, senior and special needs housing, including senior and/or group homes, if a project proponent can demonstrate a reduced need for parking. The City also enforces ADA standards for the number of parking spaces required for persons with disabilities.
There are no conditions or requirements imposed for group homes that would affect the development or conversion of residences to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. There are no minimum distance standards between two or more special needs housing developments.
The City of La Quinta has adopted the 2019 California Building Code, as well as the 2019 California Mechanical, Electrical, Energy, Fire, Residential, Green Building, and Plumbing Codes. No amendments have been made to the codes that would diminish the ability to accommodate persons with disabilities. There are no restrictions on requests for retrofitting of homes for accessibility, such as ramps and handrails.
Requests for such retrofits are handled as any other minor improvement to a home necessitating a building permit, with the exception that the design must meet all applicable standards and ADA requirements, and is reviewed at the inspection phase for conformance to construction requirements. Although requests for retrofit of existing homes have been extremely limited in the past few years, a number of homes advertised for resale in the Cove area have been retrofitted or built specifically for persons with physical disabilities and are described as such.
The public review process for the approval of group or senior homes is no different from any other permitted use in the applicable zone. Where a group or senior home is permitted by right, no public hearing is required. The project is brought to the Planning Commission if a MUP is required, and is subject to consideration and approval as any other use permitted by MUP. Where a senior group home may be requested with a MUP as part of a specific plan, the use would be considered and approved within the established public hearing process as part of the total specific plan and subject to the applicable Zoning Code provisions.
Environmental and Infrastructure Constraints
Development of new housing in La Quinta will continue to take place throughout the City. Public services and infrastructure are being upgraded and expanded within the City. Major flood control programs have been funded by the City and constructed by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for the protection of the Cove Area. In response to growth, Desert Sands and Coachella Valley Unified School Districts 497 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
141
operate several elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools that serve La Quinta residents. Three Riverside County Fire Department stations serve the City.
The potable water system in the City is operated and administered by CVWD. The sanitary sewage collection and treatment system in the City is operated and administered by CVWD, which extends service based upon approved designs and improvements constructed by the private developer. Senate Bill (SB) 1087 requires water and sewer providers to create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential projects. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings and requires future water management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development. The City routes the Housing Element update to CVWD to facilitate consistency with these requirements.
The City of La Quinta is served by Southern California Gas Company. The Southern California Gas Company has indicated that the future supply of natural gas will meet demand generated by additional development in the City.
Major infrastructure improvements, including full-width streets, water and sewer mains, and stormwater systems, are the responsibility of the developer to install with any development. Developers are required to provide parks or in-lieu fees as part of a residential development. When infrastructure improvements are made that benefit other properties, the subdivider is reimbursed from the area fund when other properties in the area are developed.
Non-Governmental Constraints
Projects requiring a Site Development Permit generally apply for building permits with 30-90 days of approval. The building permit plan check process is expedited, and if plans are submitted with only minor deficiencies, building permits will be issued within 30 to 60 days of submittal.
The City has not received requests for projects at densities lower than that proposed in the Land Use Inventory, and works with applicants to assure that the targeted density is achieved or exceeded.
Opportunities for Energy Conservation
The City has adopted a comprehensive Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program to enhance the City’s conservation of resources and to reduce 498 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
142
environmental impacts of existing and future conditions. This program will allow the City to consider a wide range of programs that will address energy, water, air quality, solid waste, land use, and transportation.
Current Regulations and Programs
Title 24 Regulations
On a regulatory level, the City enforces the State Energy Conservation Standards (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). These standards incorporated into the City’s Building Code provide a great deal of flexibility for individual builders to achieve a minimum “energy budget” through the use of various performance standards. These requirements apply to all new residential and commercial construction as well as remodeling and rehabilitation construction where square footage is added. Compliance with Title 24 on the use of energy-efficient appliances and insulation has reduced energy demand stemming from new residential development.
Green Building Programs
Two prominent green building programs are California Green Builder, recognized by the California Energy Commission, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), which is sponsored by the US Green Building Council. Both programs involve a third-party certification process, have different environmental goals, and apply to different types of development.
Green Builder is a voluntary environmental building and certification program for residential construction. Certified homes incorporate water-efficient landscaping and fixtures, utilize high efficiency insulation and ventilation systems, contain environmentally sound building materials, initiate waste reduction methods during construction, and must be 15 percent over existing Title 24 energy efficiency standards.
LEED is a national rating system for green buildings. Primarily focused on commercial and multifamily residential projects, LEED requires the developer to register their project with the US Green Building Council, which in turn reviews the project for conformance and assigns points based upon various efficiency, materials quality, and design factors.
Once the Council has reviewed the project, it issues a certification based upon the number of points achieved in each category.
City Projects
The City has undertaken an aggressive series of green building programs that demonstrate the opportunities available to reduce the overall 499 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
143
environmental impact of new developments. The Title 24 energy efficiency requirements significantly increase the overall energy efficiency of all new construction, and now require photovoltaic systems for residential projects, and will require them for commercial projects in 2030.
Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes
Located at 78-990 Miles Avenue (just west of Adams Street), the Vista Dunes project consists of 80 affordable courtyard-oriented single-family and duplex homes.
This LEED Platinum certified development includes photovoltaic cells to generate electrical power. This feature will annually save $720 per unit in electric utility costs. Water saving improvements will reduce water usage by 1,900,000 gallons per year for the entire project. It is estimated that this project exceeds Title 24 by 28 percent. Some of the units will exceed Title 24 requirements by 30 percent or more.
At the time of its development, Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes was the first LEED Platinum certified multifamily affordable housing development of its size in the country.
The City maintains a photographic history of the project and produced a video for educational purposes. Further, tenants will be educated on energy efficiencies through written materials, a DVD and the project operator, CORE Housing Management.
Wolff Waters Place Housing Project
This affordable housing development exceeds Title 24 requirements by 24 percent and will save approximately 2,000,000 gallons of water from interior water use alone. Compliance with the CVWD Ordinance will further reduce exterior water use.
The project is LEED certified and includes solar hot water for laundry buildings, a transit friendly location with a bus stop and shopping within walking distance, low-water-use landscape and irrigation, dual flush toilets, low-flow water fixtures, energy-efficient lights, ENERGY STAR appliances, recycled building materials, paint with low volatile organic compounds, reduced construction waste, advanced indoor air handling systems, underground parking, high efficiency air conditioning units, and a tenant training program. It also includes an onsite childcare center; for residents using the childcare center, the proximity of the daycare center to housing units reduces vehicle miles traveled and associated greenhouse gas emissions.
500 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
144
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
In conjunction with the adoption of its 2013 General Plan, the City adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. The Plan provides residents, business owners and land owners with a broad range of measures designed to reduce energy use and the use of fossil fuels. The Plan will be effective in reducing costs for existing homes and for new residential development. It will also allow changes in driving patterns, transit use and other measures that will reduce the City’s dependence on traditional energy sources.
Future City Programs/Actions
The City seeks to encourage and enforce regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. The City should focus on measures and techniques that assist the occupant in reducing energy costs, thereby increasing the amount of income that can be spent on housing, childcare, health care, or other necessary costs.
The continued implementation of the City’s Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program will require ongoing participation of many city departments and agencies. The program includes the City’s adherence to and promotion of green building practices, efficient energy usage, and implementation of conservation measures. The City provides information to developers based on research of best building practices and operational practices, such as commercial recycling programs provided in AB 1826. Program costs could include energy audit upgrades for existing facilities and buildings, irrigation and landscape modifications to City-maintained properties, City fleet vehicles, and City maintenance equipment.
The City’s 2013 General Plan includes a Livable Community Element that provides direction on building siting, mixed use site planning, and energy reduction techniques. The element also includes a suite of policies and programs designed to lower energy costs, promote healthy living, and encourage high quality design.
Under the direction of the City Manager’s Office, Community Development and Community Services Department staff plays an instrumental role in educating the community on water conservation programs and resources.
Energy Conservation Partners
In developing a better La Quinta, the City cannot be successful without a sound relationship with Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling 501 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
145
Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, SCAG, and other entities. Additionally, many of the areas of concern, such as air quality and regional transportation, cannot be addressed without strong regional, state and federal programs.
Utility Programs
The City of La Quinta has a strong working relationship with local utility providers, including the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). IID is proactive in creating energy savings via conservation programs, home energy audits, product rebates, and general consumer tips. IID indicates that an average home owner can reduce energy use by 10 percent more by taking advantage of IID programs. IID offers rebate programs on the purchase of higher efficiency air conditioning units, the high efficiency refrigerators, and programmable thermostats. Additionally, product rebates are offered on ENERGY STAR equipment such as home and office electronics. IID also offers free in-home energy audits to its residential customers.
Other utility programs assist residential customers with energy and water conservation and cost reduction. SoCalGas offers rebates on energy-efficient appliances, incentives for solar thermal water heating, and grants and assistance programs to reduce energy costs. The City works cooperatively with CVWD to promote and enforce, as required, water conservation programs, including those affecting homeowners and home builders. Burrtec offers programs that reduce solid waste and increase recycling opportunities.
HOUSING RESOURCES
Regional Housing Needs Assessment
State Housing Law requires that SCAG identify future housing needs in each jurisdiction. To meet this mandate, SCAG develops the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which establishes both the projected need for housing and the fair share distribution of the projected need to its member jurisdictions.
The RHNA calculates the projected new construction necessary to accommodate the anticipated population through October 2029. State housing law requires that cities and counties demonstrate adequate residential sites that could accommodate development of housing to satisfy future housing needs.
502 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
146
The 2021 RHNA proposes that La Quinta construct 1,530 new housing units to accommodate housing needs for all income groups during the planning period January 2022 through October 2029. These units are distributed by income category as illustrated in Table II-49.
According to SCAG, 420 new units are needed to accommodate very low income households. Consistent with HCD methodologies, 50% (210) of these units are assumed to be for extremely low income (ELI) households, and the remaining 50% (210) are assumed to be for very low income households. A total of 269 new units are needed to accommodate low income households, 297 new units are needed for moderate income households, and 544 new units (provided through market-rate housing) are needed for above moderate income households.
The City’s 1,530-unit future housing need is a 6.2 percent increase in the number of existing dwelling units (24,764 in 2019).
Table II-49
2022–2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment
Household Income
Levels
Income as a Percent of
County Median
RHNA
Allocation Percent
Extremely Low1 --- 210 13.7
Very Low Less than 50% 210 13.7
Low 51%–80% 269 17.6
Moderate 81%–120% 297 19.4
Above-Moderate Over 120% 544 35.6
Total 1,530 100%
Source: Regional Housing Needs Assessment for Southern California, 2021, prepared by SCAG. 1 Extremely Low Income (ELI) category is a subset of the Very Low Income category. ELI households are defined by HCD as those with incomes less than 30% of AMI. The number of ELI units is assumed to be 50% of all Very Low Income units.
California housing element law allows local governments to obtain credit toward its RHNA housing goals in three ways: constructed and approved units, vacant and underutilized land, and the preservation of existing affordable housing. The City will rely on the construction of new units on vacant lands to meet its housing needs between 2022 and 2029.
Meeting the Need for Affordable Housing
With the loss of redevelopment set-aside funds, the State has limited the City’s ability to provide funding for new affordable housing projects.
The City, however, continues to be committed to addressing its housing need.
503 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
147
The City continues to market its land in the Village (sites #2 through #6 in the land inventory, which could produce up to 42 additional units of very low and low income housing. Additional efforts will be made toward expanding housing opportunities in the Highway 111 corridor, on lands owned by private parties. Highway 111 provides access to jobs, transit, and has successfully integrated the Coral Mountain project, which the City built in the last planning period. To that end, site #13, owned by the City, has been added to the inventory, and is projected to provide 116 units for very low and low income households. The balance of the units, as shown in Table II-51, will be accommodated on multiple sites throughout the City, and will be developed through a combination of private development projects, and public/private partnerships where the City can participate if resources allow.
The City has only recently seen an increase in inquiries regarding ADUs, and it is expected that with the latest additions to the Zoning Code (2021) to address changes in State law, that interest will increase. A program has been added to encourage, monitor and reevaluate the demand for ADUs throughout the planning period as a tool to expand affordable housing options for City residents.
As discussed earlier in this Element, current conditions in the real estate market make it possible for moderate income households to afford market rate housing. Further, the rental market offers a broad range of units at rental rates, with a median gross rent of $1,473 per month. Table II-50 demonstrates the affordability of market rate rentals and home purchases in La Quinta for a moderate income four-person household. 504 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
148
Table II-50
Affordability of Housing 2021
Ownership Rental
Median Existing Single
Family Purchase Price
$386,200 N/A
Monthly Mortgage
Costs (PITI) $2,047 N/A
Median Gross Monthly
Rent N/A $1,473
30% of Monthly
Moderate Household
Income1
$2,259 $2,259
Affordability
Gap/Overage $212 $786
1 Per HCD, the annual income limit for a moderate income 4-person household in Riverside County is $90,350. Therefore, the monthly income is $7,529, and 30% is $2,259.
As shown in the table, the rental and resale market can accommodate some of the City’s expected moderate income households during the 2022-2029 planning period.
Available Land for Housing
The Housing Element must identify available sites within the City that can accommodate the RHNA. The land inventory includes an analysis of the realistic capacity of the sites. An evaluation of zoning, densities, market demand, record of affordable housing development, and financial feasibility will establish the ability of available sites to provide housing for all income levels.
Available Vacant Land
The vacant land inventory only includes parcels that the City has identified as having the potential to develop during the 2022-2029 planning period. Additional vacant sites are located in the City but are not assumed to have the potential to satisfy the current RHNA for lower income households. The development potential for Village Commercial (VC) sites is assumed to be improved through logical consolidation with adjacent vacant lots. The City has seen interest in the development of more dense residential projects in the Village, indicating that the development community has an interest and is participating in lot consolidation which could result in additional units in this part of the City. The City will encourage and facilitate lot consolidation in this district through incentives provided in Program H-3.3.b. The City will also continue to consider City-owned lands, not on the inventory, for affordable housing projects in the Village. The City’s flexible 505 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
149
development and use standards further facilitate the development of a range of housing types. The Table also includes 456 units for above moderate income households. These are all associated with approved projects which are expected to develop during the planning period. In addition, existing vacant single family lots are located throughout the City which only require building permit approvals, and two large planned communities are currently in the entitlement process, and would result in more than 2,822 units in the City, as shown in Table III-23.
Table II-51 provides a summary of the vacant land with residential development potential within the City. A map showing the parcel locations is provided in Exhibit II-25. As shown on the map, inventory lands are geographically distributed throughout the City and are not concentrated in any areas. As such, they further fair housing principles.
The City owns some of the sites shown in Table II-51. Some of these lots are located in the Village, and are small lots that the City has assembled over several years. The City is marketing the lots as consolidated parcels, and will complete lot mergers (as provided in Program H-1.1.b) to facilitate their sale. Two sites are located in the center of the City, and will be marketed for joint venture with the affordable housing development community. Sites will be offered, consistent with the Surplus Land Act, through Requests for Proposals.
Table II-51 includes sites which were in the City’s inventory in the prior planning period, but no sites have been included in the inventory for two consecutive previous planning periods.
506 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
150
Table II-51
Vacant Land Inventory
Map
Key APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning
Projected
Density
Projected
Yield
Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Sites
1 646-070-016 13.84 MHDR RMH
(AHO) 20 280
2*
770156007 0.23 VC VC 14 4
770156010 0.39 VC VC 14 5
770181009 0.36 VC VC 14 5
3 (City
Owned)
773078005 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1
773078006 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1
773078007 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1
773078016 0.12 MC/VC MC/VC 14 2
773078017 0.12 MC/VC MC/VC 14 2
773078034 1.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 15
7 604-032-042 1.88 MHDR RMH 12 22
8 (City
Owned) 600-030-010 2.72 of 11.29
MHDR RMH 19 52
9 600-390-024 15.14 CG CP/CR 18 273
10*
600080001 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080002 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080003 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080004 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080005 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080006 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080007 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080008 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2
600080009 0.21 MHDR RM 10 2
600080041 2.4 MHDR RM 10 24
11 643-020-025 4.81 CG CR 26 126
12* 600340050 4.46 MHDR RM 8 36
600340051 13.01 MHDR RM 8 104
13 (City
Owned) 600-020-057 6.42 CG CR 18 116
Total Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Sites 1,072
*Moderate income site
Above Moderate Income
Sites Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning
Projected
Density
Projected
Yield
15 Various 40.76 LDR/OS-R RVL/PR 3 90
16 Various 37.43 LDR RL/PR 3 60
17 Various 29.56 LDR RL 3 94
507 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
151
Table II-51
Vacant Land Inventory
Map
Key APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning
Projected
Density
Projected
Yield
18 Various 20.72 LDR RL 3 57
19 Various 33.07 LDR RL 3 85
20 Various 28.76 LDR RL 3 70
Total Above Moderate Sites 456
Total All Sites 1,528
508 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
152
509 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
153
Site Adequacy Analysis
The sites shown in Table II-50, above, all accommodate residential development at various densities. Site 1 is residentially designated, and benefits from the Affordable Housing Overlay, which increases its density potential (please see below).
Residential development in La Quinta, particularly that for affordable housing projects, has been built at or near the maximum allowable densities. For example, development in the RM zone generally occurred at the maximum density of 8 units per acre or above through density bonus provisions. Miraflores Apartments were constructed at a density of 11.2 units per acre in the RM zone in 2003. In 2004, Hadley Villas Apartments were developed at a density of 7.8 units per acre in the RM zone. In 2001, the Aventine Apartments were constructed at a density of 14.3 units per acre in the RH zone. The City’s most recent restricted affordable projects have also been completed within existing residential densities: Wolff Waters Place was built at 14.7 units per acre, the Washington Street Apartments’ expansion was completed at a density of 8 units per acre, Vista Dunes was built at a density of 10 units per acre, and the Coral Mountain Apartments were built at a density of 16 units per acre. In order to expand the analysis of realistic capacity, other cities in the Coachella Valley were analyzed. As the area operates as a region, with similar building trends, zoning requirements and land use patterns, an analysis of regional trends is appropriate. The following projects are planned or under construction regionally:
Palm Springs:
• Monarch Apartments, will provide 60 units affordable to very low and low income households on 3.6 acres, at a density of 17 units per acre. The project is fully funded and will break ground in October of 2021.
Palm Desert:
• Carlos Ortega Villas, consists of 72 units on 3.48 acres affordable to very low and low income households, at a density of 21 units per acre.
• Vitalia, 270 units affordable to very low and low income households on 12 acres approved in 2021, at a density of 23 units per acre.
• Millennium SARDA site, 240 units affordable to very low and low income households on 10 acres, under contract in 2021, at a density of 24 units per acre.
510 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
154
Indio:
• Arroyo Crossing 1 is currently under construction, and provides 184 units on 6.4 acres affordable to very low and low income households, at a density of 29 units per acre.
• Arroyo Crossing 2, will provide 216 units affordable to very low and low income households on 7.3 acres, at a density of 30 units per acre. The project was approved in 2021.
In the region, projects ranging in density from 17 to 29 units per acre are being funded and can be built to accommodate lower income households. Therefore, the densities for larger projects, ranging from 18 to 26 units per acre, can be achieved in La Quinta.
In the past, the City has applied the Affordable Housing Overlay to specific inventory sites which were zoned for non-residential uses. This strategy is being modified (see Program 3.1.a) to apply to all inventory sites, and to increase the AHO density to 30 units per acre, even though, as demonstrates above, affordable housing projects in the region are being built at lower densities. The 30 unit per acre density will be the base on which density bonus provisions will be applied, as described in Program 3.1.a. Units built using the AHO must be affordable to lower income households, unless they are identified as moderate income sites in Table II-50. As provided in Program 3.1.a, the AHO will allow three story construction (consistent with the existing High Density Residential Zone), and shall be analyzed to assure that development standards are sufficient to allow the 30 unit per acre density.
Site 2 consists of three small lots in the Village, on Desert Club Drive. The three lots have been approved for 14 apartments which are to be affordable to moderate income households. The three lots may be merged by the owner, but can proceed as three lots without further City processes. The owner has been finalizing building plans and construction is expected in 2022. As shown in Table III-49, market rental rates in the City are affordable to moderate income households.
Therefore, these units have been included for moderate income households.
Three sites in Table II-50 are over 10 acres in size. Although the State does not believe that these sites can be developed for affordable housing, the Coachella Valley is experiencing development of lower income projects on larger sites, including two projects in Palm Desert described above. Nevertheless, in order to encourage the development of affordable projects on these sites, Program 3.1.a has been added, which provides incentives for subdivision of larger sites. 511 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
155
It should also be noted that Site 10, which includes multiple small lots for 42 moderate income units, is an approved apartment project which is being constructed on land previously owned by the City, which was successfully sold to a private developer. The project is expected to be constructed in the next two years. The parcels previously were developed as single family homes, which the City bought to widen Jefferson Street. Upon completion of the widening, the lots were marketed to the private development community, and an apartment project was proposed in 2019, and approved in 2020 for the site. The City therefore has experience in the assembly of smaller lots for the successful development of housing.
Finally, sites 15 through 20 are provided to accommodate above moderate income households. These sites are all located in existing approved communities or tract maps, and require only residential building permits to proceed to construction.
Environment and Infrastructure Analysis
None of the parcels identified in the vacant land inventory are located in areas of topographic constraint or have known environmental hazards.
The sites identified in the vacant land inventory are adjacent to existing urbanized development and are within service hook-up distance of existing water and sewer systems as well as all dry utilities in adjacent streets. All providers have sufficient capacity to accommodate the growth generated by the units listed in Table II-51. According to the latest Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Urban Water Management Plan (2015), the implementation of water conservation, groundwater recharge, and water source substitution management strategies will ensure that adequate water resources are available to existing and future residents of La Quinta.
Affordability Analysis
It is expected that development of affordable housing units will be accomplished through public-private partnerships, with a focus on two areas of the City: the Village for smaller projects that bring residents into the expanding commercial downtown, and along Highway 111, building upon the success of the Coral Mountain apartments. It is important to note that the sites identified provide a variety of land sizes to allow flexibility in types of projects, and exceed the City’s need for very low and low income units, allowing for greater opportunities for a mix of market and affordable units within projects.
512 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
156
As described above, the median sales price for a home is approximately $386,200 and the median gross rent for an apartment unit is approximately $1,473 per month. In comparison, the maximum affordable sales price for a moderate income family of four is $313,650 and the maximum affordable rent for a moderate income couple is $1,808 per month. Moderate income households, therefore, can afford to rent in the City and are able to afford homes that are lower than the median price currently. Some moderate income households, especially one and two person households or larger families, will need assistance to purchase a home.
The City will continue to work with affordable housing developers to participate in projects and provide streamlining, financial assistance and fee reductions wherever possible. However, it is important to note, as identified by participating affordable housing developers in the City’s workshop and outreach, that funding affordable housing projects has been made much more difficult with the loss of local redevelopment funds, and that these developers must identify and secure twice or three times the funding sources that were previously necessary to fund projects. This constraint is one that the City cannot control and cannot alleviate.
General proforma analyses were conducted using land costs (average of $448,493 per acre of vacant residential land in La Quinta) and construction costs ($317,074 per unit of affordable housing according to affordable housing developers contacted in the preparation of this Update) to estimate the capacity of land in La Quinta to support affordable housing. The results indicate that homeownership products will remain available to moderate income households without a very large subsidy. The developers of ownership projects require financial returns through the one-time sale of the housing units.
A generally accepted minimum project size for affordable housing development is 50 units. Like their higher density counterparts, lower density sites able to accommodate 50 units are eligible for funding mechanisms such as Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs), a type of restricted development that must meet strict size and amenity guidelines to compete for funding. High density is also not a determining factor in obtaining other resources, such as HOME funds and Community Development Block Grant program funding. The RM and RMH sites identified in Table II-50, would both allow a minimum project size consistent with these requirements.
513 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
157
Financial and Regulatory Subsidies
A subsidy can be financial or regulatory in nature. Financial subsidies are found in federal, state, local, and private programs and organizations focused on the production of affordable housing. Developers in La Quinta use and leverage many sources of financial assistance. Projects may seek funding from LIHTCs, tax-exempt bonds, Community Development Block Grants, HOME funds, other HUD grant programs, and commercial banking resources.
Regulatory subsidies can take many forms, including fee waivers or deferrals, flexible development standards, and increased densities.
Higher densities generally increase the financial feasibility of a residential project as a developer is able to sell more housing units on the same amount and cost of land (even with slightly lower sales prices associated with smaller, attached units).
The City’s vision recognizes the importance of providing affordable housing for its residents and employees. Accordingly, the City supports affordable housing development through financial and regulatory subsidies and permits densities up to 24 units per acre with the Affordable Housing Overlay (higher densities are permitted through density bonus provisions). The City is thereby able to achieve both the goal of maintaining lower density community character while also producing its fair share of affordable housing.
Vacant Land Opportunities
The City has established a strong record of providing assistance to affordable multifamily housing projects (townhomes and apartments), ranging in density from 7.8 to over 20 units per acre. Single-family detached assisted housing was also developed, with City assistance, at densities as low as 4.4 units per acre and up to 7.8 units per acre.
La Quinta is able to achieve market-driven moderate income housing through the relative affordability of land, the local market demand for lower maintenance housing types, and reasonable development impact and entitlement fees. La Quinta has a solid record of working with local nonprofits and affordable housing developers to accommodate the housing needs of its lower income residents. The vacant land inventory provides the City and affordable housing developers with a map of opportunity areas.
The moderate income housing need can be met without any mixed-use development. However, the City recognizes that mixed-use developments will play a role in moderate and above moderate housing 514 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
158
opportunities in the future. Both the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance have been modified to encourage Mixed Use development.
The City’s efforts to promote mixed use development have had limited success. According to the development community, mixed use projects cannot be financed in La Quinta, due to a lack of such projects in the region. Mixed use properties are therefore not included in this inventory.
Fair Housing
According to the Fair Housing analysis (see “Fair Housing” section), the City has a low segregation level, no racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, equal access to opportunity, and no disproportionate housing needs. The sites identified above will not exacerbate any such conditions.
515 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
PRESERVATION OF AT RISK UNITS
State Government Code requires that localities identify and develop a program for their Housing Elements for the preservation of affordable multifamily units assisted under various federal, state and local programs. In the preservation analysis, localities are required to provide an inventory of assisted, affordable units that are eligible to convert to market rate within five years of the end of the planning period (2034).
Income-restricted housing units sometimes change to market rate due to expiration of subsidies, mortgage prepayments, or expiration of affordability restrictions.
An inventory of all assisted multifamily projects is provided in Table II52. The earliest possible date of conversion for any of the City’s restricted multifamily housing stock is 2051 for the extremely low and low income units at Seasons Senior Apartments. There are no at risk units in the City.
516 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
160
Table II-52
Assisted Multifamily Project Inventory
Project
Earliest
Date of
Conversion
Extremely
Low
(30%)
Very
Low
(50%)
Low
(80%)
Moderate
(120%)
Above
Moderate
(120%+)
Total
Aventine
Apartments
(47750 Adams St)
2056 --- --- 10 10 --- 20
Hadley Villas
Senior
Apartments
(78875 Avenue 47)
2059 65 12 1 --- 1 79
Seasons at
Miraflores Senior
Apartments
(47747 Gertrude
Way)
2057 45 71 --- --- --- 116
Seasons La Quinta
Senior
Apartments
(50915 Rainbow
Ct.)
2051 19 --- 37 31 --- 87
Vista Dunes
Courtyard Homes
(44950 Vista
Dunes Lane)
2063 8 64 8 --- --- 80
Washington
Street (senior)
Apartments 1
(42800
Washington)
2066 24 72 42 2 --- 140
Wolff Waters
Place
(47795 Dune
Palms Road)
2065 43 56 37 80 --- 216
Coral Mountain
Apartments
(79625 Vista
Coralina Lane)
2070 --- 36 138 2 --- 176
Total N/A 204 311 273 125 1 914
Source: City of La Quinta
1 Rental assistance for anyone ≤ 50% AMI or lower
Maintenance of the at-risk housing units as affordable will depend largely on market conditions, the status of HUD renewals of Section 8 contracts, and the attractiveness of financial incentives, if warranted. 517 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
161
GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS
The following goals, policies, and programs set forth a comprehensive housing plan for the City of La Quinta during the 2022-2029 planning period.
Adequate Sites for Housing
GOAL H-1
Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City’s existing and projected population.
v Policy H-1.1
Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. Provide new housing choices by increasing affordable housing supply in higher opportunity areas and throughout the community, and improve housing mobility through encouraging various housing options such as accessory dwelling units and creative housing solutions.
Program 1.1.a: To address the City’s RHNA allocation for extremely low income households, 15% of units on the City’s land on Highway 111 (site #13) will be assigned to extremely low income households.
The City shall negotiate very low income units for all other projects on sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II-50) individually to reach the target of 210 units during the planning period.
§ Timing: June 2025 for Highway 111 project, as projects are constructed for additional units
§ Funding Source: Private Funding, Tax Credit Financing, Other sources as identified
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
§
Program 1.1.b: The City will merge its parcels in the Village (as listed in Table II-51) to facilitate the consolidation of these lots for sale through the Surplus Land Act.
§ Timing: June 2023 for lot mergers. June 2024 for RFPs and land sales.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
518 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
162
Program 1.1.c: To encourage the development of housing for extremely low, low and special needs residents, the City will develop a program of incentives for the subdivision of larger sites, to include application fee waivers, DIF fee reductions and expedited processing. The City will contact the owners of the three sites listed in Table II-50 and encourage that they subdivide the land and take advantage of the City’s incentive program.
§ Timing: June 2022 for development of program. June 2023 for initial contacts with land owners, and annually thereafter. § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Planning Division, City Manager’s Office/Housing
v Policy H-1.2
Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing.
v Policy H-1.3
Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities are provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available.
v Policy H-1.4
The City shall promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities throughout the community for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, disability, source of income, veteran or military status, or other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code Section 65008, and any other applicable state and federal fair housing and planning law.
Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing
GOAL H-2
Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate income households.
v Policy H-2.1
Increase housing choices for lower and moderate income households in areas of higher need and throughout the community. Address disproportionate housing needs and alleviate disproportionate cost 519 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
163
burdens on lower and moderate income households by providing more affordable housing units.
Program H-2.1.a: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
The City will modify its Zoning Ordinance to comply with State law regarding ADUs and JADUs and provide for the reduced parking standards, setbacks and other incentives included in the law. The City shall establish a program to encourage the building of ADUs and JADUs, with a goal of 2 new units per year
throughout the planning period, and monitor their development to gauge if they are affordable alternatives for housing. The program will include tracking annual permits, an annual survey of rents in ADUs, and whether any ADUs are accepting housing subsidy or restricting their units to very low or low income households.
§ Timing: Zoning amendments June 2022. Monitoring program beginning June 2023.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-2.1.b: City-owned Lots
Aggressively pursue development of the City’s central-city properties (sites 8 and 13) to generate up to 168 units of extremely low, very low and low income units on these parcels.
To implement this program, the City will establish a schedule for Requests for Proposals and include incentives. These incentives may include elimination of Development Impact Fees, financial assistance in the form of land contributions, and density bonuses as provided in the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the City will consider affordable housing for other City-owned lots in the Village when marketing the land for development, including mixed use projects that combine retail and residential uses.
Wherever possible, include 15% affordable units in these projects § Timing: Annually, beginning with June 2023.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
Program H-2.1.c: Creative Housing Solutions
In order to expand the variety of housing options for extremely low and low income households in the City, study, research and pursue the amendments to the Zoning Code and subdivision ordinance that would be required to allow creative housing 520 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
164
solutions, including “tiny homes,” prefabricated or “kit” homes, shipping container conversions, and other options available in the market as they arise. Present the findings of the research to the Planning Commission and Council for their consideration.
This program could generate up to 4 units per year in creative housing solutions.
§ Timing: Research June 2024. Planning Commission and City Council Study Session no later than June 2025. Amendments per Council direction by the end of 2025.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department v Policy H-2.2
Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing.
Program H-2.2.a: Density Bonus Amendments
Revise the Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with
Assembly Bill (AB) 2345 as it pertains to Density Bonus requirements.
• Timing: June 2022 regular Zoning Ordinance update
• Funding Source: General Fund
• Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department v Policy H-2.3
Pursue a variety of forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing throughout the community.
Program H-2.3.a: Collaborative Partnerships
The City shall continue to meet with affordable housing development entities to discuss types of incentives available and requirements for obtaining assistance, discuss appropriate sites for housing for extremely low, low and special needs residents, and foster professional collaboration between the City and affordable housing stakeholders. This program could result in 2 new partnership projects during the planning period.
§ Timing: Project-by-project basis, by request, or on an annual basis.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department 521 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
165
Program H-2.3.b: Mixed Use in the Highway 111 Corridor
In order to take advantage of the high density residential permitted in the Mixed Use overlay, develop a menu of
incentives, including reduction in development fees, density bonuses and other provisions for the inclusion of affordable housing units in Mixed Use projects within the Highway 111 Plan area. This program could result in 100 to 300 new units of affordable housing in the Corridor.
§ Timing: Menu of incentives, June 2023. As projects are proposed
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
Program H-2.3.c: Affordable Housing Renter-to-Owner Transition There are many resources that the City, nonprofits, or for-profit developers may utilize to subsidize the construction and maintenance of affordable housing. This program, in conjunction with Program H-2.3.a, could result in 2 new partnership projects during the planning period. Some of the most prominent
resources are described below.
§ Timing: Update website with funding information and
partnership opportunities by June 2022, and every six months thereafter.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
Low Income Tax Credits
Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. A minimum of 20 percent of the units must be affordable to low income households and 40 percent of the units must be
affordable to moderate income households.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act provides favorable financing to affordable housing developers. The Redevelopment Agency, development community, and local, regional, and national banks are encouraged to work together to meet their obligations pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act.
522 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
166
California Housing Finance Agency Program
The California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) has three singlefamily programs for primarily moderate and middle income homebuyers: the Home Ownership Assistance Program and the Affordable Housing Partnership Program. Each provides
permanent mortgage financing for first-time homebuyers at below-market interest rates.
HOME Funds
HOME is the largest Federal block grant distributed to state and local governments for the creation of lower income housing.
Cities apply when Notices of Funding Availability are issued.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program
HUD’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program makes emergency assistance grants available to local governments for the acquisition, redevelopment, and renting or resale of foreclosed properties at-risk of abandonment.
Riverside County First-Time Homebuyers Program
Continue participation in the Riverside County First-Time Homebuyers Program for low and moderate income households.
Mortgage Credit Certificate
The Riverside County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program is designed to assist low and moderate income first time
homebuyers. Under the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, first-time homebuyers receive a tax credit based on a percentage of the interest paid on their mortgage. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for home loans, as it increases the effective income of the buyer. Under federal legislation, 20 percent of the funds must be set aside for buyers with incomes between 75 and 80 percent of the county median income.
Finance Agency Lease-Purchase Program
Riverside/San Bernardino County Housing Finance Agency Lease Purchase Program provides down payment assistance and
closing costs for eligible households up to 140 percent of the area median income.
Housing Choice Voucher (formerly Section 8) Referrals
Housing Choice Vouchers allow lower income households to use rental subsidies anywhere in the County, including La Quinta. 523 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
167
Program H-2.3.d: Sweat Equity and Shared Equity
Continue to work with organizations that offer sweat and shared equity housing programs to lower and moderate income
households in La Quinta, with a goal of assisting 2 to 4 households annually. Sweat equity and shared equity programs provide lower and moderate income households with ownership assistance. Sweat equity refers to the exchange of time and effort, usually in the form of construction activities, for an affordable ownership opportunity.
• Timing: Meet with CVHC and Habitat for Humanity annually or more frequently (if requested) to identify opportunities for coordinated efforts or potential housing projects.
• Funding Source: General Fund
• Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
Removal of Governmental Constraints to Housing
GOAL H-3
Create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents.
v Policy H-3.1
Remove unnecessary regulatory constraints to enable the construction or rehabilitation of housing that meets the needs of La Quinta residents, including lower income and special needs residents.
Program 3.1.a: All properties listed in the Affordable Housing Inventory for extremely low, very low and low income units shall have the Affordable Housing Overlay applied. Further, the AHO text shall be amended to allow 30 units per acre and to allow 3 story development. The analysis that accompanies the Zone text amendment shall demonstrate that the development standards being applied to the AHO, including setbacks, height and parking requirements, allow a density of 30 units per acre. Consistent with Government Code Section 65583.2(h) and (i), the AHO will permit owner-occupied and rental multifamily residential use by right for developments in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower income households during the planning period. These sites shall be zoned with minimum density of 20 units per acre and development standards that permit at least 16 units per site.
524 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
168
§ Timing: October 2022 for Zoning Map and text amendments § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Planning Division
v Policy H-3.2
Coordinate the development of affordable housing throughout the community with the provision of key utilities to ensure prompt and adequate service.
v Policy H-3.3
Incentivize the development of affordable housing to facilitate the development of housing for the City’s lower and moderate income households throughout the community.
Program H-3.3.a: Priority Water and Sewer Service
Route the adopted Housing Element to the CVWD and notify them of changes and future updates to the Housing Element. In compliance with state law, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential project. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings, and requires future water
management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development.
§ Timing: Upon Housing Element adoption
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, Coachella Valley Water District
Program H-3.3.b: Encourage Lot Consolidation
Although not on the Site’s Inventory, several small lots in the Village Commercial would have improved development potential through lot consolidation. The Village Build Out Plan and Zoning Code amendments have been completed to encourage
consolidation. The City continues to market its land in the Village, and will also work with private land owners and developers to assemble larger holding to allow multi-family projects which increase the number of residents in the Village. The City will consider potential incentives including fee deferral or reductions, parking requirement reduction, and relief from various other development standards that could potentially increase the cost of the project, resulting in 1 new project per year.
525 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
169
§ Timing: As City staff reviews projects in the Village § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department GOAL H-4
Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties, including targeting areas of higher need and concentration of lower income households.
v Policy H-4.1
Protect the quality of La Quinta’s neighborhoods through the rehabilitation of both affordable and market-rate homes. v Policy H-4.2
Promote financial and technical assistance to lower and moderate income households for housing maintenance and improvements. v Policy H-4.3
Encourage the retention and rehabilitation of existing single-family neighborhoods and mobile home parks that are economically and physically sound.
v Policy H-4.4
Enhance neighborhoods that presently provide affordable housing with drainage, lighting and landscape amenities, and parks and recreation areas, including targeting areas of higher need and concentration of lower income households. Employ government and non-government resources to preserve and revitalize neighborhoods and communities and thereby provide protection against disinvestment-based displacement.
Program H-4.4.a: Housing Condition Survey & Monitoring
Complete an inventory of housing conditions (updated
approximately every five years) to enable the City to properly target Code Compliance and rehabilitation resources. To better understand the City’s housing needs the quality and condition of the housing stock must be inventoried on a regular basis. The inventory should focus on older neighborhoods, such as those south of Calle Tampico, west of Washington Street, and north of Highway 111.
526 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
170
§ Timing: Complete by June 2023
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-4.4.b: Habitat for Humanity Residential Rehabilitation Program
Complete the Memorandum of Understanding with Habitat for Humanity to implement the “Brush with Kindness” program. The program will be implemented by Habitat volunteers who will donate time for repair and maintenance programs, including yard work, weed abatement, window replacements, roof
repairs, and air conditioning repair. Residents will be prioritized to focus on seniors, veterans, the disabled, low and very low income residents, and those in affordably-designated homes.
The first-year City contribution will be $40,000, and the annual amounts will be reviewed every year based on the success of the program.
§ Timing: MOU by June 2022, assist 6 households annually through the planning period
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Habitat for Humanity, City Manager’s Office/Housing
Program H-4.4.c: County of Riverside Home Repair Grant
Refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside for home repair grants. The County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Home Repair Program provides lower income households with up to $6,000 for home repairs such as a new roof, new air-conditioner, or a handicap ramp. As a jurisdiction in Riverside County, lower income La Quinta households are eligible for this grant.
§ Timing: Throughout planning period, refer 5 households annually
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, City Manager’s Office/Housing
Program H-4.4.d: Rehabilitation Resources List
Provide a rehabilitation resources list on the affordable housing and code compliance pages of the City’s website. Use the list, in online or printed form, as a reference for code violators. Lower and moderate income homeowners may need assistance in
527 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
171
affording important home repairs and improvements. The City can assist these households by compiling and sharing a listing of local, state, and federal programs offering rehabilitation assistance.
§ Timing: Create list by June 2022. Distribute to 15 households annually.
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, Community Resources Department, City Manager’s
Office/Housing
Equal Housing Opportunity
GOAL H-5
Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons.
v Policy 5.1
Provide the regulatory framework to create an environment in which housing opportunities are equal.
v Policy 5.2
Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the sale or rental of housing.
Program H-5.2.a: Collaborate and coordinate with government agencies (e.g. Fair Housing Council of Riverside County) and nonprofit groups (e.g. Habitat for Humanity) to support outreach and expansion of lending programs for homeownership among
minority populations. Advertise workshops and webinars held by these organizations on financial resources for homeownership on the City website, under News page and Directory of Services (see Program H-5.2.c). This program could result in homeownership for 5 minority households annually.
• Timing: Annually (June) with adoption of budget, subject to available funding.
• Funding Source: General Fund
• Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
528 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
172
Program H-5.2.b: Fair Housing Referrals
Continue to refer up to 10 tenants and landlords annually to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. Provide information on fair housing resources on the City’s website and at City Hall.
Identify and coordinate with local nonprofits, service
organizations and community groups that can assist in
distributing fair housing information. Fair housing organizations provide dispute resolution and legal assistance to tenants and landlords in conflict. Such services are particularly important for lower and moderate income households unable to afford
counsel.
§ Timing: Referral service as needed. Information to be maintained on website
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
Program H-5.2.c: Directory of Services
Maintain the online directory of services and information to provide La Quinta residents with contact information for community organizations and service providers that address special needs. While numerous services are available to special needs and lower income households, it can be difficult to readily have access to these resources. A directory provides the contact information necessary to seek housing assistance.
§ Timing: Update website annually
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
v Policy 5.3
Encourage support services for the Coachella Valley’s homeless populations through referrals and collaborative efforts with non-profits and other jurisdictions.
Program H-5.3.a: Regional Facilities for the Homeless
Continue to support and collaborate with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Homelessness Committee efforts to maintain a regional homeless facility that provides housing as well as supportive services. The Strategic Plan created by the Homelessness Committee establishes a continuum of care for the Coachella Valley.
529 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
173
§ Timing: City staff will continue to collaborate with CVAG throughout the planning period and work with the
appropriate facilities directly.
§ Funding Source: Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office/Housing
v Policy 5.4
Assist in the creation of a continuum of care for the homeless population and those transitioning into permanent housing.
Program H-5.4.a: Low Barrier Navigation Centers
Review and revise, as necessary, the Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 101 as it pertains to Low Barrier Navigation Centers. Modify the definition of “homeless shelter” to include this use.
• Timing: June 2022 at regular Zoning Ordinance update
• Funding Source: General Fund
• Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-5.4.b: Zoning Amendments for Emergency Shelters, Transitional and Supportive Housing
Revise the Zoning Ordinance to require that homeless shelters only be required to provide parking for employees; and that Transitional and Supportive Housing be permitted uses in the Medium, Medium-High and High density residential zones. • Timing: June 2022 at regular Zoning Ordinance update
• Funding Source: General Fund
• Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department v Policy 5.5
Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may create barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design.
Energy and Water Conservation
GOAL H-6.1
Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials.
530 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
174
v Policy H-6.1
Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption.
v Policy H-6.2
Facilitate housing development and rehabilitation that conserves natural resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions. v Policy H-6.3
Encourage and enforce green building regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing.
v Policy H-6.4
Focus sustainability efforts on measures and techniques that also assist the occupant in reducing energy costs; therefore reducing housing costs.
v Policy H-6.5
Use and encourage emerging technologies to reduce high demands for electricity and natural gas including use of passive solar devices and where feasible other renewable energy technologies (e.g., biomass, wind, and geothermal).
Program H-6.5.a: Going Green La Quinta Program
Implement green goals, policies, and programs that accurately represent the City’s direction in resource conservation and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Implement design
standards for residential and commercial structures that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation.
§ Timing: As projects are proposed
§ Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H-6.5.b: Energy Conservation Partners
Continue to meet with and seek insight from utilities, service providers, and other entities involved in energy conservation efforts appropriate for La Quinta. In working toward a
sustainable La Quinta, the City and its residents will need to collaborate with utilities and service providers. Partnerships with the Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, 531 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
175
Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, Southern California Association of Governments and other entities will be an important component of making La Quinta a more livable city.
§ Timing: As part of regular coordination meetings with utilities § Funding Source: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office, Design and Development Department
Program H-6.5.c: Energy Efficiency Programs
Investigate all potential energy efficiency programs and provide a list of programs on the City’s Going Green website. In addition to programs that may become available through IID, investigate other opportunities, including state and federal incentives, and promote them on the Going Green website.
§ Timing: Ongoing as programs are identified
§ Funding Source: General Fund, IID program funds, and other programs as identified
§ Responsible Agency: City Manager’s Office, Design and Development Department
Program H-6.5.d: Weatherization Assistance
Encourage low income homeowners or renters to apply for IID and SCG programs, including free energy audits, home
weatherization, and utility rebate programs by advertising available programs on the City’s website and at City Hall. § Timing: Advertise annually as program funds are available § Funding: General Fund
§ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, City Manager’s Office
532 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Appendix A
Public Outreach Materials
533 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
AB 1486 - List of Developers that have notified the Department of Housing and Community Development of Interest in Surplus Land, Table Range A2:J486 Revised: 12/1/2020 County Organization CalHFA Certified Housing Sponsor? Address City State Zip Contact Phone Email Address RIVERSIDE COUNTY Green Development Company X 251 S Lake Ave #320 Pasadena CA 91105 Andrew Slocum (310) 467-9329 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY A Community of Friends 3701 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 700 Los Angeles CA 90010 Mee Heh Risdon (213) 480-0809 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Affordable Homestead LLC 915 W Foothill Blvd Ste 488C Claremont CA 91711 William Leong (213) 375-8248 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Bibi Foundation 1514 N. Raymond Ave Fullerton CA 92831 Riaz Chaudhary (714) 213-8650 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY City Ventures, LLC 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150 Irvine CA 92612 Anastasia Preedge [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Coachella Valley Housing Coalition 45-701 Monroe Street, Suite G Indio CA 92201 Julie Bornstein (760) 347-3157 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Cypress Equity Investments 12131 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 801 Los Angeles CA 90025 Mike Diacos (310) 405-0314 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Decro Corporation 3431 Wesley Street, Suite F Culver City CA 90232 Laura Vandeweghe (310) 595-4421 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Families Forward 8 Thomas Irvine CA 92618 Steven Moreno (949) 552-2729 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Housing Innovation Partners 5151 Murphy Canyon Rd. #120 San Diego CA 92123 Jon Walters (619) 417-5361 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Integrity Housing 4 Venture, Suite 295 Irvine CA 92618 Paul Carroll (949) 727-3656 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Olivecs Foundation 328 E. Commonwealth Ave Fullerton CA 92832 Rubina Chaudhary (562) 972-2786 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY The Kennedy Commission 17701 Cowan Ave. #200 Irvine CA 92614 Cesar Covarrubias (949) 250-0909 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Universal Standard Housing 350 S Grand Avenue, Suite 3050 Los Angeles CA 90071 Eduardo Santana (213) 320-3554 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY USA Properties Fund, Inc 3200 Douglas Blvd Ste 200 Roseville CA 95661 Gabriel Gardner (916) 239- 8458 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Workforce Homebuilders LLC 547 Via Zapata Riverside CA 92507 Tony Mize (951) 530-8172 [email protected]
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS
National Community Renaissance 9421 Haven Aven., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CA Tony Mize, VP-Acquisitions 909-727-2783 [email protected] Urban Housing Commuinties 2000 E. Fourth St., #205, Santa Ana, CA 92705 CA Mark Irving 714-835-3955 ext 114 [email protected] CITY LIST American Housing Partners, Inc. 4075 Prospect Ave., Suite 101 Yorba Llinda CA 92886 Robert Zamora, CPM 714-577-9644 [email protected] CITY LIST HGH Real Estate Partners, LLC 74-710 Highway 111, Suite 102 Palm Desert CA 92260 Howrd Gordon, President 760-565-2099 [email protected] Community Housing Opportunities Corporation 5030 Business Center Drive #260, Fairfield, CA 94534 CA Vince Nicholas
Joy Silver
Charles Liuzzo
Yegor Lyashenko
Minami Hachiya 707-759-6043
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected] www,chochousing.org
Pacific West 430 E. State Street, Ste 100, Eagle, ID 83616 CA Darren Berberian 949-599-6069 [email protected] www.tpchousing.com Habitat for Humanity 72680 Dinah Shore Dr., #6, Palm Desert, CA 92211 CA 760-969-6917 www.hfhcv.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services 9551 Pittsburgh Avenue Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Jenny Ortiz (909) 988-5979 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Habitat for Humanity for the Coachella Valley 72680 Dinah Shore Dr. #6 Palm Desert CA 92211 (760) 969-6917 [email protected]; [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Coachella Valley Association of Governments 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Ste 200 Palm Desert CA 92260 Cheryll Dahlin (760) 346-1127 [email protected] RIVERSIDE COUNTY Lift to Rise 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 100 Palm Desert CA 92260 Araceli Palafox [email protected] [email protected]
[email protected]
DUPLICATE Lift To Rise 73-710 Fred Waring Dr. Suite 100, Palm Desert, CA 92260 CA 760-636-0420 www.lifttorise.org DUPLICATE Coachella Valley Housing Coalition 45701 Monroe St, Indio CA 92201 CA Maryann Ybarra 760-347-3157 [email protected] www.cvhc.org City RSVP List
534 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
CITY OF LA QUINTA
HOUSING ELEMENT
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP
A community workshop for the City’s Housing Element
Update (2021-2029 planning period) will be held
Wednesday, January 13, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. via Zoom. At
this workshop, the City will discuss background
information regarding its upcoming Housing Element
Update including new State Housing Element law, the
2021-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA)
allocation for the City and take public comments on the Update from those attending. All members of the public
are encouraged to attend.
The Housing Element is a series of goals, policies, and implementation measures for the preservation,
improvement, and development of housing, which
would apply throughout the City. It meets the
requirements of the California Department of Housing
and Community Development, and State law.
To participate in the workshop via Zoom, please RSVP
by email to [email protected], by 10:00 a.m. on the day of the meeting (requests received after 10:00 a.m.
on meeting day may not be processed). Specific
questions regarding the workshop or Housing Element
may be directed to Cheri Flores, Planning Manager, at
(760) 777-7067 or to [email protected].
The City of La Quinta promotes fair housing and makes
all programs available to low-income families and
individuals, regardless of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, political affiliation, sex, age, sexual orientation or other arbitrary factor.
Wednesday, January 13, 2021 | 5 PM
C O M M U N I T Y
W O R K S H O P N O T I C E
535 CLICK HERE to Return to Agenda
Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 10:19:57 Pacific Standard Time