Agenda packet, regular meeting, first session — La Verne City Council, August 3, 2026 (part 2 of 3)

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
RKA~

CONSULTING GROUP

Page 2 of 3 ends

BID DATE: 6/23/2026
PHONE (909) 594-9702 TIME: 10:00 AM
FAX (909) 594-2658 PLACE: Planet Bids
Sheet: 2 of 3
Computed By: CAH
Item
No.
1 Clearing and Grubbing, Mobilization, & NPDES for the lump sum price of 1 LS 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 5,418.00$ 5,418.00$ 2 Traffic Control for the lump sum price of 1 LS 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 8,500.00$ 8,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 General Grading and Unclassified Excavation for the lump sum price of 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 4 Construction Staking & Monument Preservation for the lump sum price of 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,400.00$ 3,400.00$ 5 Cold Mill 2” AC Pavement for the Square Foot price of 3500 SF 2.25$ 7,875.00$ 3.00$ 10,500.00$ 2.15$ 7,525.00$ 1.50$ 5,250.00$ 1.50$ 5,250.00$ 6 Remove Existing 6” Curb & Gutter for the Linear Foot price of 250 LF 2.50$ 625.00$ 30.00$ 7,500.00$ 17.00$ 4,250.00$ 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 20.00$ 5,000.00$ 7 Sawcut, Remove & Reconstruct Existing Bus Pad; W=10’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 131-2 for the Square Foot price of 940 SF 38.00$ 35,720.00$ 25.00$ 23,500.00$ 25.00$ 23,500.00$ 35.00$ 32,900.00$ 35.00$ 32,900.00$ 8 Sawcut, Remove & Reconstruct Existing PCC Driveway Approach; W=7’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 110-2; Type B for the Square Foot price of 60 SF 28.00$ 1,680.00$ 50.00$ 3,000.00$ 35.00$ 2,100.00$ 45.00$ 2,700.00$ 30.00$ 1,800.00$ 9 Remove Existing & Reconstruct 4” PCC Sidewalk per SPPWC Std. Plan 112-2 for the Square Foot price of 1890 SF 27.00$ 51,030.00$ 14.00$ 26,460.00$ 15.00$ 28,350.00$ 22.00$ 41,580.00$ 12.00$ 22,680.00$ 10 Remove and Reconstruct Existing Parkway Drain; W=1’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 151-2 for the Each price of 1 EA 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 11 Remove and Reconstruct Existing Parkway Drain; W=2’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 151-2 for the Each price of 1 EA 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 12 Construct 6” Curb & Gutter Per SPPWC Std. Plan 120-2 Type A2-6(150) for the Linear Foot price of 35 LF 85.00$ 2,975.00$ 75.00$ 2,625.00$ 50.00$ 1,750.00$ 65.00$ 2,275.00$ 65.00$ 2,275.00$ 13 Construct 8” Curb & Gutter Per SPPWC Std. Plan 120-2 Type A2-8(200) for the Linear Foot price of 215 LF 85.00$ 18,275.00$ 80.00$ 17,200.00$ 31.00$ 6,665.00$ 75.00$ 16,125.00$ 75.00$ 16,125.00$ 14 Construct New 80’ Bus Pad; W=10’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 131-2 for the Square Foot price of 830 SF 35.00$ 29,050.00$ 25.00$ 20,750.00$ 17.00$ 14,110.00$ 32.00$ 26,560.00$ 35.00$ 29,050.00$ 15 Construct 2” Overlay on Existing AC Pavement for the unit price of 45 TON 300.00$ 13,500.00$ 300.00$ 13,500.00$ 280.00$ 12,600.00$ 220.00$ 9,900.00$ 300.00$ 13,500.00$ 16 Remove Existing Bus Bench & Install New ADA Compliant LNI Mirage Bus Bench for the Each price of 1 EA 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 7,200.00$ 7,200.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 17 Paint Curb Red for the Linear Foot price of 220 LF 1.32$ 290.73$ 8.00$ 1,760.00$ 12.00$ 2,640.00$ 5.00$ 1,100.00$ 2.75$ 605.00$ 18 Paint Curb Green for the Linear Foot price of 60 LF 1.32$ 79.27$ 10.00$ 600.00$ 31.00$ 1,860.00$ 5.00$ 300.00$ 2.75$ 165.00$ 19 Install Modified R28D Sign & Post for the Each price of 4 EA 600.00$ 2,400.00$ 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,450.00$ 5,800.00$ 1,200.00$ 4,800.00$ 380.00$ 1,520.00$ 20 Install PV Stop Max and Push Button Unit with the LiFePO4 Battery for the Each price of 1 EA 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 4,660.00$ 4,660.00$ 21,500.00$ 21,500.00$ Base Bid Amount
Comments
Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
Summary of proposals received for:

Durward Way Bus Pad Project
398 Lemon Creek Drive, Suite E, Walnut, CA 91789
Engineer's Estimate Green Point Design Build
Services Inc. ADA General Engineering Inc. Estate Design and Construction Carter Enterprises Group Inc.

Total Unit Price TotalUnit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price $225,000.00 $184,895.00 $189,350.00 $195,400.00 $198,688.00

Page 129 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
RKA~

CONSULTING GROUP
-

Page 3 of 3 ends

BID DATE: 6/23/2026
PHONE (909) 594-9702 TIME: 10:00 AM
FAX (909) 594-2658 PLACE: Planet Bids
Sheet: 3 of 3
Computed By: CAH
Item
No.
1 Clearing and Grubbing, Mobilization, & NPDES for the lump sum price of 1 LS 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 8,503.00$ 8,503.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2 Traffic Control for the lump sum price of 1 LS 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 4,700.00$ 4,700.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 3 General Grading and Unclassified Excavation for the lump sum price of 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 11,050.00$ 11,050.00$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 4 Construction Staking & Monument Preservation for the lump sum price of 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3,850.00$ 3,850.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 5 Cold Mill 2” AC Pavement for the Square Foot price of 3500 SF 2.25$ 7,875.00$ 2.50$ 8,750.00$ 3.00$ 10,500.00$ 3.07$ 10,745.00$ 2.00$ 7,000.00$ 6 Remove Existing 6” Curb & Gutter for the Linear Foot price of 250 LF 2.50$ 625.00$ 29.00$ 7,250.00$ 25.00$ 6,250.00$ 27.56$ 6,890.00$ 30.00$ 7,500.00$ 7 Sawcut, Remove & Reconstruct Existing Bus Pad; W=10’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 131-2 for the Square Foot price of 940 SF 38.00$ 35,720.00$ 34.00$ 31,960.00$ 15.00$ 14,100.00$ 37.99$ 35,710.60$ 28.00$ 26,320.00$ 8 Sawcut, Remove & Reconstruct Existing PCC Driveway Approach; W=7’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 110-2; Type B for the Square Foot price of 60 SF 28.00$ 1,680.00$ 71.00$ 4,260.00$ 18.00$ 1,080.00$ 78.54$ 4,712.40$ 16.00$ 960.00$ 9 Remove Existing & Reconstruct 4” PCC Sidewalk per SPPWC Std. Plan 112-2 for the Square Foot price of 1890 SF 27.00$ 51,030.00$ 15.00$ 28,350.00$ 15.00$ 28,350.00$ 15.79$ 29,843.10$ 12.00$ 22,680.00$ 10 Remove and Reconstruct Existing Parkway Drain; W=1’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 151-2 for the Each price of 1 EA 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 6,052.00$ 6,052.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$ 11 Remove and Reconstruct Existing Parkway Drain; W=2’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 151-2 for the Each price of 1 EA 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 14,000.00$ 14,000.00$ 6,052.00$ 6,052.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 12 Construct 6” Curb & Gutter Per SPPWC Std. Plan 120-2 Type A2-6(150) for the Linear Foot price of 35 LF 85.00$ 2,975.00$ 53.00$ 1,855.00$ 45.00$ 1,575.00$ 60.36$ 2,112.60$ 115.00$ 4,025.00$ 13 Construct 8” Curb & Gutter Per SPPWC Std. Plan 120-2 Type A2-8(200) for the Linear Foot price of 215 LF 85.00$ 18,275.00$ 104.00$ 22,360.00$ 50.00$ 10,750.00$ 107.98$ 23,215.70$ 120.00$ 25,800.00$ 14 Construct New 80’ Bus Pad; W=10’; Per SPPWC Std. Plan 131-2 for the Square Foot price of 830 SF 35.00$ 29,050.00$ 40.00$ 33,200.00$ 22.00$ 18,260.00$ 43.23$ 35,880.90$ 26.00$ 21,580.00$ 15 Construct 2” Overlay on Existing AC Pavement for the unit price of 45 TON 300.00$ 13,500.00$ 383.00$ 17,235.00$ 595.00$ 26,775.00$ 395.99$ 17,819.55$ 140.00$ 6,300.00$ 16 Remove Existing Bus Bench & Install New ADA Compliant LNI Mirage Bus Bench for the Each price of 1 EA 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 3,200.00$ 3,200.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4,162.50$ 4,162.50$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 17 Paint Curb Red for the Linear Foot price of 220 LF 1.32$ 290.73$ 3.00$ 660.00$ 4.00$ 880.00$ 3.00$ 660.00$ 5.00$ 1,100.00$ 18 Paint Curb Green for the Linear Foot price of 60 LF 1.32$ 79.27$ 3.00$ 180.00$ 4.00$ 240.00$ 3.00$ 180.00$ 5.00$ 300.00$ 19 Install Modified R28D Sign & Post for the Each price of 4 EA 600.00$ 2,400.00$ 414.00$ 1,656.00$ 414.00$ 1,656.00$ 739.00$ 2,956.00$ 450.00$ 1,800.00$ 20 Install PV Stop Max and Push Button Unit with the LiFePO4 Battery for the Each price of 1 EA 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 9,150.60$ 9,150.60$ 21,000.00$ 21,000.00$ Base Bid Amount
Comments
Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
Summary of proposals received for:

Durward Way Bus Pad Project
398 Lemon Creek Drive, Suite E, Walnut, CA 91789
Engineer's Estimate Miramar General
Engineering Leonida Builders, Inc. Alfaro Communications Construction Inc. Gentry Brothers Inc.

Total Unit Price TotalUnit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price $225,000.00 $203,916.00 $223,416.00 $224,245.95 $230,365.00

Page 130 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
RKA~

CONSULTING GROUP
-
City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report

DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: JR Ranells, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: PHOTOGRAPHY PERMIT REQUEST FROM MORE MEDIA, INC.

SUMMARY
The City has received a request from More Media, Inc. to conduct a commercial photography shoot for clothing and merchandise at the La Verne Skate Park. Although the request does not involve traditional film production, Staff is requesting City Council authorization to execute an agreement and issue a permit consistent with the City's film permit process.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with More Media, Inc. and authorize issuance of the required permit, subject to the applicant satisfying all City permit, insurance, and agreement requirements.

DISCUSSION
Staff received a request from More Media, Inc. to conduct a commercial photography shoot at the La Verne Skate Park, located south of City Hall at the corner of D Street and Durward Way, on Thursday, August 13, 2026, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.

During the approved photography shoot, the skate park will be closed to the public for one day and will reopen per regularly scheduled hours immediately following completion of the event. The proposed shoot will involve photography for clothing and merchandise. The skate park would be closed to the public for the duration of the shoot; however, no impacts to public infrastructure or the surrounding neighborhood are anticipated. All photography activities will occur within the boundaries of the skate park, and cast and crew vehicles, as well as equipment staging, will be accommodated in the Bonita High School parking lot. More Media, Inc. will also provide private security throughout the event.

The La Verne Skate Park is located on property owned by the Bonita Unified School District (BUSD), and the applicant has obtained the necessary authorization from the District to use the site. Because the skate park is operated by the City, City approval is also required. The attached agreement establishes the terms and conditions for use of the facility and must be executed before the photography shoot may proceed.

Although this request is for a commercial photography shoot rather than traditional filming, Staff believes the proposed activity is sufficiently similar to the City's film permit process and is therefore requesting City Council authorization to ensure consistent application of City policy.

FISCAL ANALYSIS

Page 131 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Photography Permit Request from More Media, INC., Page 2

There is no fiscal impact to the City. More Media, Inc. will be responsible for all applicable permit fees and will provide insurance meeting the City's requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this report.

ATTACHMENTS

1. More Media Photography Permit Agreement - INO Merchandise

2. Application

3. COI

4. Workers Comp COI

5. Site Map

Page 132 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

AGREEMENT TO PERMIT COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 4th day of August, 2026, by and between the CITY OF LA VERNE, a municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”) and More Media, Inc. (hereinafter “More Media”). The parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Project. More Media has requested City to grant a permit for commercial photography titled “INO” in the City of La Verne.

2. Location. Filming will be conducted on the grounds of Bonita High School in and around the La Verne Skate Park located at 3102 D Street, La Verne, CA 91750 (hereinafter referred to as the “Site”).

3. Schedule. Photography activities will occur on August 13, 2026 and may occur only on this date from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Any deviation from this schedule is subject to the advance approval of the City Manager.

4. Fees. The following estimated fees shall be deposited by North Six, Inc. with the City prior to the commencement of filming.

Application/Permit Issuance fee $ 500.00
Fire Department personnel/inspection $ 0.00
Police Services $ 0.00
Public Works Right of Way $ 0.00
Administration/Legal $ 750.00
Security Deposit (Refundable) $ 500.00
Total fees/ deposit due $ 1,750.00

Photography activities do not indicate the necessity of a Fire Department or Police Department presence during production, set up, or take down. However, any Police or Fire response as a result of a call for service by any individual or entity as a result of More Media activities, will be billed at the applicable hourly rate per Police Officer and or Fire Department employee. Should circumstances arise that require City Staff to be present, the City will determine the extent to which full-time observation is necessary.

5. Street Closures. There are no closures of public streets authorized by this Agreement.

6. Noise; Special Effects. More Media has represented that its photography will not result in loud continuous noise at the Site. No “special effects” shall be utilized in the at Site. “Special effects” means articles containing any pyrotechnic composition manufactured and assembled, designed, or discharged in connection with television, theater, or motion picture productions.

7. Insurance. More Media shall provide City with a certificate of insurance evidencing

Page 133 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
liability coverage, in an amount of at least $1,000,000, naming the City of La Verne, its elected and appointed officials, employees and or agents as additional insured’s. More Media shall also provide evidence of Worker’s Compensation coverage. Evidence of insurance coverage shall be submitted prior to the commencement of photography at Site.

8. Indemnification. More Media shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers and employees, from and against any and all damages to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons, including property and employees or agents of City, and shall defend, indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims, demands, suits, actions or proceedings of any kind or nature, including, but not by way of limitation, worker's compensation claims, resulting from or arising out of the negligent acts, intentional acts, errors or omissions of More Media, its employees, its independent contractors or subcontractors. These provisions shall survive the termination of the Agreement.

9. Liaison. The authorized representative for the City shall be the City Manager or his designee. The City Manager’s designee for this production is Assistant City Manager JR Ranells. Assistant City Manager Ranells may be contacted at (909) 596-8710; cell (909) 717- 3226. All changes to the schedule or the authorized activities per this Agreement shall be subject to the prior approval of the City Manager’s designee. The authorized representative for More Media is Josh Martinez. Mr. Martinez may be contacted via phone (817) 680-6590.

10. Notices. Notices and correspondence shall be delivered in person or sent by certified mail to the following addresses:

CITY OF LA VERNE
Attn. City Manager
3660 “D” Street
La Verne CA 91750

More Media, Inc.

Attn. Josh Martinez
2142 Fargo Street
Los Angeles, CA 90039

11. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that any legal action is commenced to enforce or interpret the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall, in addition to any other relief and costs, be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees.

12. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated with cause by either party hereto. Unless earlier terminated for cause, this Agreement shall be effective on the date signed by both parties and shall terminate on August 14, 2026.

13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties hereto as to the matters contained herein.

14. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended upon the written mutual agreement

Page 134 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
of the parties through their designated representatives.

IN WITNESS of the foregoing, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.

CITY OF LA VERNE

By:___________________________
City Manager

MORE MEDIA, INC.

By:___________________________
Josh Martinez, More Media, Inc.

Page 135 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE - FILM PERMIT APPLICATION
(Please print legibly in dark ink or type.)
Production Title: ____________________________Type of Film: _____________________ Total Cast & Crew: ______

Production Co: _____________________________Location Mgr: __________________________ Cell:_____________

Co. Address: _______________________________City:___________________ Zip:___________ Phone: ___________

Location Service Rep/Agent:_________________________________________________________ Phone: __________

Signature of Film Company Rep: ________________________________________________________ Date: _________ LOCATIONS:

1)_________________________________________[ ] 2)____________________________________________[ ]

3)_________________________________________[ ] 4)____________________________________________[ ] FILMING ACTION: (Write all location #'s that apply, i.e.. 1,3 Tow Shots) _____ INT Dialogue _____ EXT Dialogue

_____ Camera in Curblane _____ DriveUps/Aways _____ Drive By's Music Genre:___________________

_____ Camera on Sidewalk _____ Running Shots _____ Police Escort _____ Animals _____ Lane Closure ____ _ Tow Shots _____ Street Closure _____ Drive w/Flow of Traffic

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FILMING ACTIVITIES: _____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

VEHICLE TOTALS (On-street parking only):
_____ Trucks _____ Condors
_____ Picture Cars _____ Shuttle
_____ Personal Crew Cars

Note: The police officer will enforce these on-street vehicle totals.

1 INO Photo Shoot 20
Josh Martinez / ProducerMore Media, Inc.
2142 Fargo St.

N/A
Los Angeles 90039 480.252.4311
2026/7/22
Josh Martinez / Producer
Bonita Skatepark - 2100 Durward Way 91750
Photo shoot at Bonita Skatepark for clothing / merchandise. Talent against skatepark scenery.

No Stunts, No SPFX, No flame, No minors, No animals, No wet-down, No playback, 817.680.6590
15

Page 136 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
)
CITY CHECKLIST:

1. Business License issued ? Yes_____ No_____

2. Certificate of Comprehensive Public Liability Insurance of $1,000,000 with C i t y o f L a V e r n e c o - i n s u r e d a n d C i t y o f f i c e r s a n d e m p l o y e e s a s a d d i t i o n a l i n s u r e d . Y e s _ _ _ _ _ N o _ _ _ _ _

3. Property Owners within 30 0 feet of filming activity notified? Yes_____ No_____

4. City of La Verne Fire Department review of filming? Yes_____ No_____

Number of Firefighters Required: _____________
Number of Officers Required: _______________

5. Workers' Compensation Insurance Certificate submitted? Yes_____ No_____

6. Parking Plan submitted? Yes_____ No_____

8. Written permission of property owner? Yes_____ No_____

9. Special permits required? Yes_____ No_____

10. Provisions for detouring traf fic? (describe below or attach) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ **********

Needed Approval
Approved by: Date: Conditions:
____ Community Development Department: _________________ __________ ________________________ ____ Community Services Department: _________________ __________ ________________________ ____ Police Department: _________________ __________ ________________________ ____ City Manager: _________________ __________ ________________________ ____ City Council: _________________ __________ ________________________ Assigned City Manager Liaison: _______________________ Name

_______________________ Phone

_______________________ Fax
2

Page 137 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A :

NAIC #
NAME:

CONTACT
(A/C, No):

FAX
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext):

PHONE

INSURED
REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR
WVD
ADDL
INSD

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $
$
$PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person)

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOSAUTOS ONLY

NON-OWNED

SCHEDULEDOWNED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
ER
OTH-

STATUTE
PER

LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EFF

POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR
INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE
$AGGREGATE
$
OCCUR

CLAIMS-MADE
DED RETENTION $
$PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$GENERAL AGGREGATE
$PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$MED EXP (Any one person)
$EACH OCCURRENCE

DAMAGE TO RENTED
$PREMISES (Ea occurrence)

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

POLICY PRO-

JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
7/22/2026
NFP Prop & Casualty Serv Inc.
340 N. Westlake Blvd Ste 255
Westlake Village CA 91362
Jessica Ruger
805-579-1900
805-579-1916
[email protected]
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
27154
MOREMED-01
OBI America Insurance Company
15645
More Media, Inc.
2142 Fargo St.

Los Angeles CA 90039
1665225653
A
X
1,000,000
X
100,000
10,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
X
Y
875-00-19-99-0001
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
1,000,000
A
1,000,000
X
X
875-00-19-99-0001
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
A
X
5,000,000
X
873-00-00-37-0002
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
5,000,000
B
X
406-04-92-85-0003
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
A
Miscellaneous Equipment
Third Party Property Damage
Prop, Sets, Wardrobe
710-04-02-50-0005
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
Deductible $2,500
Deductible $2,500
Deductible $2,500
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
This certificate only applies to equipment, prop, set, wardrobe, vehicle and location rentals made by the Named Insured.

City of La Verne, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are included as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of operations performed by the Named Insured in connection with permitted photography and or filming activities within the City of La Verne. Blanket additional insured endorsement included for equipment, prop, set, wardrobe, vehicle, and location rental companies.

There is no coverage for stunts, pyrotechnics, underwater or aerial filming unless confirmed under a separate certificate of insurance.

See Attached...

City of La Verne
3660 "D" Street
La Verne CA 91750

Page 138 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
ACORD®
~ I
I
- ~ □
--R
□ □
-- -- -- -
- H
I I
I I I
□
I
ACORD 101 (2008/01)
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
© 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: FORM TITLE:

ADDITIONAL REMARKS
ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page of
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID:

LOC #:

AGENCY

CARRIER NAIC CODE

POLICY NUMBER

NAMED INSURED
EFFECTIVE DATE:

MOREMED-01
1 1
NFP Prop & Casualty Serv Inc.

More Media, Inc.
2142 Fargo St.

Los Angeles CA 90039
25 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
Hired Auto Physical Damage Limit $1,000,000 Deductible $2,000 (When In front of the camera) Hired Auto Physical Damage Limit $1,000,00 Deductible 10% of the Loss subject to a $2,500 Minimum and a $7,500 Maximum

CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The attached Certificate of Insurance is provided as part of our service to our client, the Insured. If special endorsements have been provided, they also are indicated attached. You may find that these documents do not comply with all the terms and conditions of the underlying contract between the Certificate Holder and the Insured due to the insurance company’s insuring conditions, limitations, exclusions and other terms.

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

NFP Property & Casualty Insurance Services, Inc.

CA License #0F15715
340 N. Westlake Blvd| Ste 255| Westlake Village, CA 91362 Telephone: (805) 579-1900

Page 139 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
,,.,...........

ACORD®
~
I

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 01 12 19

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CG 20 01 12 19 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1

PRIMARY AND NONCONTRIBUTORY

OTHER INSURANCE CONDITION

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

The following is added to the Other Insurance
Condition and supersedes any provision to the
contrary:

Primary And Noncontributory Insurance
This insurance is primary to and will not seek
contribution from any other insurance available to
an additional insured under your policy provided
that:
(1) The additional insured is a Named Insured
under such other insurance; and
(2) You have agreed in writing in a contract or
agreement that this insurance would be
primary and would not seek contribution
from any other insurance available to the
additional insured.

E-INSURED

Page 140 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
-
POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 26 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CG 20 26 12 19 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1

ADDITIONAL INSURED DESIGNATED

PERSON OR ORGANIZATION

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE

Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s):

Persons or Organizations as required by written contract executed prior to the date of an "Occurrence" solely and directly arising from the actions of the named insured.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

A. Section II Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an additional insured the person(s) or
organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only
with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury"
caused, in whole or in part, by your acts or
omissions or the acts or omissions of those acting
on your behalf:

1. In the performance of your ongoing
operations; or

2. In connection with your premises owned by
or rented to you.

However:

1. The insurance afforded to such additional
insured only applies to the extent permitted
by law; and

2. If coverage provided to the additional insured
is required by a contract or agreement, the
insurance afforded to such additional insured
will not be broader than that which you are
required by the contract or agreement to
provide for such additional insured.

B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following is added to
Section III
Limits Of Insurance:

If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the most we
will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the
amount of insurance:

1. Required by the contract or agreement; or

2. Available under the applicable limits of
insurance;
whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the
applicable limits of insurance.

875-00-19-99-0001

E-INSURED

Page 141 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 28 12 19

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

CG 20 28 12 19 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1

ADDITIONAL INSURED LESSOR OF

LEASED EQUIPMENT
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE

Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s):

All Lessors
Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

A. Section II Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an additional insured the person(s) or
organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only
with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury"
caused, in whole or in part, by your maintenance,
operation or use of equipment leased to you by
such person(s) or organization(s).

However:

1. The insurance afforded to such additional
insured only applies to the extent permitted by
law; and

B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, this insurance does not apply
to any "occurrence" which takes place after the
equipment lease expires.

C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following is added to
Section III
Limits Of Insurance:

If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the most we
will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the
amount of insurance:

1. Required by the contract or agreement; or

2. Available under the applicable limits of
insurance;
whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the applicable
limits of insurance.
875-00-19-99-0001

E-INSURED

Page 142 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A :

NAIC #
NAME:

CONTACT
(A/C, No):

FAX
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext):

PHONE

INSURED
REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR
WVD
ADDL
INSD

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOSAUTOS ONLY

NON-OWNED

SCHEDULEDOWNED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
ER
OTH-

STATUTE
PER

LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EFF

POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR
INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE
$AGGREGATE
$
OCCUR

CLAIMS-MADE
DED RETENTION $
$PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$GENERAL AGGREGATE
$PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$MED EXP (Any one person)
$EACH OCCURRENCE

DAMAGE TO RENTED
$PREMISES (Ea occurrence)

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

POLICY PRO-

JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
5/15/2026
NFP Prop & Casualty Serv Inc.
340 N. Westlake Blvd Ste 255
Westlake Village CA 91362
Jessica Ruger
805-579-1900
805-579-1916
[email protected]
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
27154
MOREMED-01
OBI America Insurance Company
15645
More Media, Inc.
2142 Fargo St.

Los Angeles CA 90039
1779076460
A
X
1,000,000
X
100,000
10,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
X
875-00-19-99-0001
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
1,000,000
A
1,000,000
X
X
875-00-19-99-0001
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
A
X
5,000,000
X
873-00-00-37-0002
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
5,000,000
B
X
406-04-92-85-0003
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
A
Production Package
710-04-02-50-0005
5/8/2026
5/8/2027
See Below
Loc # Employees Address
1 2 -2142 FARGO ST, LOS ANGELES, CA 90039-3923
2 1 -3702 E JASPER DR, GILBERT, AZ 85296-8246
3 1 -NO SPECIFIED LOCATION, NASHVILLE, TN 37201
4 1 -NO SPECIFIED LOCATION, AUSTIN, TX 78701
5 1 -424 LEWISBURG AVE, FRANKLIN, TN 37064-2801
6 1 -8006 SOUTHVALE BLVD, FRANKLIN, TN 37064
More Media, Inc.
2142 Fargo St.

Los Angeles CA 90039

Page 143 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
ACORD®
~ I
I
- ~ □
--R
□ □
-- -- -- -
- H
I I
I I I
□
I

Page 144 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Skatepark Entrance
*from North End
of Parking Lot
w (1 ............ _....., l rq
Bonita Skatepark
2100 Durward Way
La Verne, CA 91750
..... ~- r
Crew Parking:

Utilize street parking
along Durward Way
Working Trucks/ Base Camp:

Parking Lot
110 D St.

La Verne, CA 91750
*utilize North End of the parking lot
- closest to the skate park entrance.

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report

DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CANCELING THE AUGUST 17, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

SUMMARY
The second meeting in August 2026 is requested to be canceled due to lack of business.

Accordingly, the item requires the City Council to adopt a resolution to cancel the meeting.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the attached resolution titled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, CANCELING THE AUGUST 17, 2026, CITY COUNCIL MEETING."

DISCUSSION
The City Council meeting on August 17, 2026, is requested to be canceled due to a lack of business. The City Council has previously canceled a meeting in August due to fewer agenda items being produced during the summer months. City Staff have reviewed potential agenda items and those items will either be moved to the first meeting in September.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this report.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Reso Canceling August 17, 2026

Page 145 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, CANCELING THE AUGUST 17, 2026, CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Verne as follows:

Section 1. City Council Meetings are set forth by La Verne Municipal Code Section

2.08.10 as being held at least once a month at such times as the City Council shall from time to time fix by resolution.

Section 2. Resolution 23-51 set forth that City Council Meetings are to be held the first and third Monday of each month, except as otherwise ordered by the City Council.

Section 3. Due to a lack of foreseeable items of business due to fewer agenda items being produced during the summer months, the August 17, 2026, meeting shall be canceled.

Section 4. The Mayor shall sign and the Deputy City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and thereupon the same shall take effect and be in force.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of August, 2026.

__________________________
Mayor Tim Hepburn
Attest:

______________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk

Page 146 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

Resolution No. 26-XX 2

CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-XX was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of August, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

_____________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk

Page 147 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report

DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Eric Scherer, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE GILEAD SCIENCES DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

SUMMARY
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is requesting approval of a First Amendment to the Development Agreement to extend the term through May 5, 2031, and update the impact fee provision. No changes are proposed to the approved land uses, development standards, or project entitlements. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment at its June 10, 2026, meeting.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Determine that the proposed First Amendment remains within the scope of the previously adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum prepared for the project, and that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164; and

2. Conduct a First Reading and waive further readings of an Ordinance titled, "AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA VERNE AND GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1800 WHEELER AVENUE, WITHIN THE ARROW CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN, CASE NO. 56-26DA."

DISCUSSION
Development Agreements are authorized pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 and provide a mechanism for local governments and property owners to establish a mutually beneficial framework governing the development of property over a specified period of time. In exchange for providing public benefits and complying with agreed- upon conditions, Development Agreements provide developers with certainty regarding applicable regulations and development rights.

On May 5, 2016, the City Council approved a Development Agreement with Gilead Sciences, Inc. under Case No. 79-14DA for property located within the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan.

Section 3 of the Agreement established an initial ten-year term and provides for a one-time five- year extension upon mutual agreement of the parties prior to expiration.

Page 148 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Gilead Sciences Development Agreement., Page 2

The initial term expired on May 5, 2026. Prior to the expiration date, Gilead Sciences submitted a request to exercise the one-time extension provision contained in the Development Agreement. Although City Council consideration is occurring after the expiration date, the request was timely submitted in accordance with the Agreement. Accordingly, the proposed First Amendment extends the term retroactively to May 6, 2026, through May 5, 2031, ensuring continuity of the rights, obligations, and protections established under the existing Agreement.

Staff finds that the retroactive effective date is appropriate because the extension request was received prior to the Agreement's expiration.

The amendment also revises Section 7(a) regarding impact fees. The revised language clarifies that impact fees applicable during the extended term shall be those in effect as of January 1, 2027, providing certainty regarding fee obligations throughout the extension period.

The proposed amendment does not modify the approved project, authorize additional development, increase development intensity, change permitted land uses, increase building square footage, or alter the development standards established under the original Development Agreement. All provisions of the existing Agreement remain unchanged except for the extension of the term and the revision to the impact fee provision.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Approval of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement will not have an immediate fiscal impact on the City's General Fund. The amendment extends the term of the existing Agreement and updates the applicable impact fee provision but does not authorize additional development or modify the approved project. Future development under the Agreement will remain subject to the payment of applicable impact fees as provided in the amended Agreement, as well as applicable taxes, fees, and other revenues generated by future development.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed First Amendment has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The original Development Agreement and associated project approvals were previously evaluated through an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and subsequent Addendum approved by the City Council.

The proposed amendment does not authorize additional development, increase development intensity, expand the project footprint, modify approved land uses, or result in any new environmental impacts beyond those previously analyzed.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required because there are no substantial changes to the project, no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken, and no new information of substantial importance that would require major revisions to the previously adopted environmental document.

Accordingly, staff finds that the proposed amendment remains within the scope of the previously adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum and that no additional environmental review is required.

LEGAL REVIEW

Page 149 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the Gilead Sciences Development Agreement., Page 3

The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Recorded Gilead Sciences Development Agreement

2. PC Resolution No. 1360

3. Draft CC Ordinance

4. Amendment #1 - Gilead 2026

Report Prepared By: Coordinated with:

Candice Bowcock, Planning Manager Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

Page 150 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

Page 151 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD
~~oflO.t-41\ia 20160791953
t~ ~\ llmlllHllillllllllmlllHHIIIHlm p~rr
\ 1 Recorded/Filed in Official Records
~ • . J Recorder's Office, Los Angeles County,
r California
07/07/16 AT 02:24PM
t7EVELOPMeNT FEES:

ACrftEEMEMT 8)! ANP ~:::

BETWEEN CITY oF LA PAID:
\{E~1'1E Al-ID C:flt,EAD S~ IENlf£,
.._I Ne.., NO. ~-•+DA
E6W!l4
111 111111111 IH II IHI IIU 11111111 1111111

LEADSHEET
IH 1111 IIII II I II 111111111111111 Ill 1111
201607072830046
00012264428
I IIIIII Ill Ill llll llll lllll llll 11111111111111111 007632759
SEQ:
02 DAR - Mail (Intake)
I IIIIIIIII Ill llllllll II llll llll Ill lllll llll llll Ill Ill lllll IIIII Ill Ill llll llll 11111 IIH 111111111111111 IIIII IIII IIII IIIII IHI II~ lllll llll lllll llll 111111111111111

THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED

0.00 0.00

Page 152 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
Deputy City Clerk
City of La Verne
3660 D Street
La Verne, CA 91750
Document Number:12264423
I llllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll /111111111111 Batch Number:7632759

I IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED F_9-R~'.~~R~~~~~;,
-..... ,,- . ·~ r~v .. ~.-·· '.:: ::.~ ~~-._.:.: ..
-:; , .. :~ ~- ~, - '-"" ,
Exempt from Recordation Fee per G~~nt Cods.:Sect1on_27383 . , ~ •• •A /I ~ ~~v ? i ~ ·:

U~<lU_ '~\ : ::,:;.: :::·
Lupe Gaeta Estrella, Deputy City Clerk , ~ \ ~ ::::, : <- .

City of La Verne ' '-" ~w~ ~ ,.__: _ - • ·~.- :·
- .. ./ ,6,--,.;;, ... ..,1,,._.,-· ... , __ -,~-
...:..c ;',..
, ,) .., ' '-~ '
TITLE , .. _:-:. · •
Development Agreement by and between City of La Verne
and Gilead Sciences, Inc., No. 79-14DA

Page 153 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of La Verne
Community Development Department
3660 D Street
La Verne, CA 91750
Version of
22 February 2016

SPACE ABOVE THJS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
EXEMPT FROM RECORDA TlON FEE PER GOV, CODE §27383
sf-3456544

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

CITY OF LA VERNE
AND
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.

NO. 79-14DA

Page 154 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 4th day of April, 2016 (" Agreement Date"), by and between the CITY OF LA VERNE, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Gilead Sciences, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (herein "Developer"), pursuant to the authority of Article 2.5, Chapter 4, Division 1, Title 7 (Sections 65864 et seq.) of the Government Code, relating to development agreements with respect to the following matters:

RECITALS
A. Government Code sections 65864 to 65869.5 (herein the "Development Agreement Law") provides that cities may enter into development agreements with private interests for the mutual benefit of the parties to such agreements, on satisfaction of the conditions specified therein.

B. This Agreement relates to the development of a Gilead North American Manufacturing Campus in the City of La Verne, County of Los Angeles, State of California (the "Project"). Components of the Project include manufacturing, packaging, warehousing, shipping, administration, and quality control, (including Phase I and Phase II, as described more fully below). A legal description of the Project site (the "Property") is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Developer has a legal or equitable interest in the Property.

C. The Project is located in the Business Park district of the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan. The Project would, upon development, utilize an approximately 23 acre piece of vacant property, and will provide well-paying jobs, increased property tax revenues and business license tax revenues for the City. Developer desires to develop the Project in two phases and seeks assurance from the City that the General Plan, Specific Plan, and applicable zoning regulations will not change with respect to this Property in order that both phases of the Project may be timely completed. City in turn desires to ensure that Developer's Project may proceed so that City may obtain the benefits of the development.

D. In order to develop the Project, Developer applied for a Precise Plan Review, a height variance to allow development of a building of 55 feet with associated screening and equipment up to 75 feet, a height variance to allow retaining walls up to 11 feet and an ornamental metal fence up to 8 feet, and a tract map to combine the twelve existing lots into one lot and eliminate the previously dedicated street.

E. In accordance with Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and Sections 15 I 62 and 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared an Addendum to the La Verne Technology Center Initial Study- Mitigated Negative Declaration which showed that this Project would not have any new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects beyond those that were identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the development known as the La Verne Technology Center that was previously approved for this Property.

F. Following the required public notice and hearings and prior to approving this Development Agreement, the following entitlements were approved for the Project:
sf-3456544

Page 155 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

1. On August 5, 2014, the Development Review Committee ("DRC") issued a conditional approval letter for Precise Plan of Review for Phase I of the Project (Case No. 56- 14PPR) and recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Tentative Tract Map (Case No. 57-14TTM) and the Variances (Case No. 58-14VAR), based on conditions, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B;

2. On August 13, 2014, by Resolution No. 1138, the Planning Commission approved the tentative tract map combining 12 lots into one lot and eliminating the previously dedicated public street that ran through the Property, and found that the street vacation was consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code section 65402 and adopted an Addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C; and

3. On August 13, 2014, by Resolution No. 1139, the Planning Commission also approved variances allowing building height of up to 55 feet with parapet and equipment height up to 75 feet and retaining walls up to 12 feet and adopted an Addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D; and

4. On October 20, 2014, the City Council approved the final tract map for Tract No. 72987, including the street vacation; and

5. On March 9, 2016, by Resolution No. 1167, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Development Agreement; and

6. On April 4, 2016, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 1067, approving this Development Agreement, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit E; and

7. The Addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration contemplated the Development Agreement as a possible component of the Project that was evaluated in the Addendum, and accordingly no further CEQA review is necessary.

G. The entitlements listed in Paragraph F, as they may be amended from time to time, along with this Development Agreement, are referred to as the "Existing Approvals." Any subsequent land use entitlements or approvals required or requested by Developer for the development of Phase I or Phase II of the Project, including but not limited to a new Precise Plan Review for Phase 11, are referred to as the "Subsequent Approvals". The Existing Approvals and the Subsequent Approvals are referred to herein as the "Project Approvals".

H. Development of the Property and Project pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Project Approvals will provide for orderly growth and development consistent with the development standards, policies and programs of City. The City will obtain substantial immediate and long-term economic and community benefits from the establishment of the Project within the City.

I. City and Developer have taken all actions mandated by and fulfilled all requirements set forth in the Development Agreement Law. sf-3456544 2

Page 156 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
J. Having duly considered this Agreement and having held the noticed public hearings, City finds and declares that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with the Applicable Standards (as defined herein) in effect on the Effective Date (as defined herein).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other considerations, the value and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the thirty-first day following the adoption by the City Council of the Ordinance approving this Agreement (the "Effective Date").

2. Definitions.
(a) "Applicable Standards" means:
(i) The provisions of this Development Agreement; and
(ii) The Existing Approvals and the conditions of their approval, to the extent that same have been approved for or granted to all or a portion of the Project prior to or on the Effective Date; and
(iii) The Subsequent Approvals that are approved for or granted to all or a portion of the Project following the Effective Date, including any and all subsequent tentative maps, use permits, variances, design review and building permits; and (iv) Existing Land Use Regulations.
(b) "Existing Land Use Regulations" means the ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations, and official policies of the City adopted by the City Council or Planning Commission in effect on the Effective Date that govern the permitted uses of land, the density and intensity of use, the timing of development, any sign improvements, engineering and design standards, and, except as provided below with respect to the Construction Codes construction specifications applicable to the development of the Project, including, but not limited to:
(i) The City's General Plan;
(ii) The Arrow Corridor Specific Plan; and
(iii) The City's Zoning Ordinance found in Title 18 of the La Verne Municipal Code (the "City Zoning Law").
( c) "Construction Code" shall mean the California Building Standards Code (Title 26 Los Angeles County Building Code), the California Electrical Code (Title 27 Los Angeles County Electrical Code), the California Plumbing Code (Title 28 Los Angeles County Plumbing Code), the California Mechanical Code (Title 29 Los Angeles County Mechanical Code), the and those other uniform construction, fire and other codes applicable to improvements, structures and development, and the applicable version or revision of said codes in place at the time that a building, grading or other permit subject to such Construction Codes is submitted to the City for approval, provided that all of the following shall apply:
sf-3456544 3

Page 157 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
(i) Such Construction Codes have been adopted by the City and are in effect on a Citywide basis;
(ii) Such Construction Codes shall be interpreted and applied in a reasonable manner consistent with the express provisions and limits in the particular Construction Code(s) adopted by the City; and
(iii) The provisions of such Construction Code(s) shall be interpreted and applied to the property in a manner consistent with the generally prevailing interpretation of such provision(s) under the State Building Standards Code. ( d) "Impact Fees" means development impact fees, exactions, assessments, repayment of bonded indebtedness, or fair share charges or similar impact fees or charges imposed by the City on a City-wide basis on and in connection with development in accordance with the Applicable Standards, as shown on Exhibit F. Impact Fees do not include Processing Fees and Charges (as defined herein).
( e) "Processing Fees and Charges" means all fees, per the City fee schedule, for land use applications, building permits, grading permits, encroachment permits, tract or parcel maps, lot line adjustments, street vacations, certificates of occupancy, and other similar permits, and the fees or charges applied for plan check and similar processing. Processing Fees and Charges are not considered to be Existing Land Use Regulations.

3. Term; Duration. This Agreement shall expire ten (10) years from and after the Effective Date of this Agreement. The term of this Agreement may be further extended for an additional five-year term, for a total of fifteen years, at any time before its expiration date by the mutual agreement of the parties to this Agreement and by following the procedures for the extension of the term of statutory development agreements which are provided for by the resolutions or ordinances of the City Council and by the Development Agreement Law. In the event that litigation to which the City and/or the Developer, or any of its officers, agents, employees, contractors, representatives or consultants, is a party, should delay implementation or construction of the Project on the Property, the expiration date of this Agreement shall be tolled from the time the summons and complaint is served on the defendant(s) until the judgment entered by the court is final and not subject to appeal.

4. Proiect Description. During the term of this Agreement, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms hereof, in developing the Property consistent with the Project described herein, Developer is assured, and City agrees, that the development rights, obligations, terms and conditions specified in the Applicable Standards are and shall be fully vested in Developer and may not be changed or modified by the City, except as may be expressly permitted by, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, or as expressly consented thereto by Developer to the extent such proposed change or modification is applicable thereto. At the discretion of Developer, the Project may be developed in two phases as follows:
(a) Phase I shall consist of those uses, density, and intensity as approved in the Existing Approvals.
sf-3456544 4

Page 158 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
(b) Phase II as presently contemplated shall consist of development of up to an additional four ( 4) buildings with a total of approximately 81,000 additional square feet including a parking structure with approximately 325 additional parking spaces. (i) Phase II shall require a Precise Plan Review, subject to review and approval by the Development Review Committee, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The City's review of the Precise Plan Review shall be limited to consistency with Phase I and consistency with the description of Phase II in this Section 4(b ), as it may be amended pursuant to this Agreement. Phase II will not require additional environmental review absent an occurrence of a specific event that would trigger such review in accordance with Section 21166 of CEQA or section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. (ii) Phase II uses shall be limited to those uses allowed as of right by the Business Park district of the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan. If Developer desires to develop Phase II with a conditionally permitted use, a conditional use permit shall be required. (iii) The building heights for Phase II shall not exceed the heights approved as part of the Project Approvals and shall be consistent with Phase I. ( c) Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the ability of Developer to apply for, and for the City to approve in its reasonable discretion, entitlements and other approvals for new or different uses, density, or intensity on the Property in the future, in accordance with all applicable laws and standards in effect at that time. In reviewing any such request or application, City acknowledges and agrees that it shall have discretion only as to the increases in density or intensity, or uses, to the extent the same are greater than that contemplated or authorized by this Agreement.
( d) The term of any and all Project Approvals shall automatically be extended for the longer of the term of this Agreement or the term otherwise applicable to such Project Approvals.

5. Development Standards for the Proiect.
(a) Upon the Effective Date of this Agreement, and for the term of this Agreement unless there is an uncured default by Developer under this Agreement after written notice and expiration of the cure period as set forth in Section 19 hereof, the City hereby grants to Developer a vested right to develop and construct on the Property all the improvements for the Project authorized by, and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the Applicable Standards. Development of the Project or any part thereof is not required by this Agreement and is wholly in the discretion of the Developer. The permitted uses of the Property, the density or intensity of use, the location of uses, and the maximum height and size of proposed buildings shall be, and shall not exceed, those set forth in the Applicable Standards. (b) Upon such grant of right, Developer's exercise of such right and all other rights provided to Developer under this Agreement shall not be impaired, affected or limited by any ordinance, resolution, initiative, referendum, moratorium or other measure adopted by the City, the voters of the City or any other body having jurisdiction that directly or indirectly relates to, or limits, the rate, timing or sequencing of the development of, or construction on, all or any part of the Project that is in conflict with the Applicable Standards, or that reduces the development rights provided by this Agreement or any amendment thereto ("New City Laws"). sf-3456544 5

Page 159 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Without limiting the foregoing general statement, and for all purposes pursuant to this Agreement generally, and this Section 5 specifically, a New City Law shall be deemed to conflict with the Applicable Standards if the New City Law seeks to, whether as part of a specific or general enactment that applies to the Property or Project: (i) limit or reduce the density, intensity, height or size of structures or type of development on the Property; (ii) regulate the timing of the development of the Property in any manner; (iii) impose any new fees or increase or accelerate the due dates of any existing fees, other than processing fees and charges, applicable to the development of the Property; (iv) require any additional on-site or off site improvements not required by the Applicable Standards or this Agreement to be constructed or paid for by Developer or a subsequent owner of the Property; or (v) restricting the use of the Property in any manner or degree, other than restrictions expressly set forth in the Applicable Standards.
(c) Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v.

City of Camarillo (1984) 3 Cal. 3d 465, that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later-adopted initiative restricting the timing and controlling the parties' agreement, the parties to this Agreement declare that is their mutual intent to avoid such a result by hereby acknowledging and providing for the right of Developer to develop the Project in such order and at such rate and times as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its sole and subjective business judgment, except as specifically stated otherwise in this Agreement including Section 4 hereof.
( d) Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver by Developer of its right to obtain approvals for the Project within the times set forth in the Permit Streamlining Act ( commencing with Section 65920 of the Government Code), the Subdivision Map Act ( commencing with Section 66410 of the Government Code), and all other applicable provisions of law as the same may be amended from time to time.
(e) The City acknowledges and agrees that it is entering into this Agreement to encourage and induce Developer to invest in and build the Project in order to obtain benefits for the City, and that Developer will rely on this Agreement in making decisions regarding the Project.

6. Future Approvals/Modifications.
(a) Developer may make minor changes to the Project ("Minor Modifications") without amending this Agreement upon the administrative approval of the Community Development Director, provided that such modifications are consistent with the Applicable Standards and do not constitute major modifications as set forth in subsection (b) below. City shall not unreasonably withhold or delay approval of any Minor Modification. City shall have the right to impose reasonable conditions in connection with the Minor Modification; provided however, such conditions shall not (a) be inconsistent with the Applicable Standards; (b) directly or indirectly, unreasonably hinder, delay, impede, obstruct, interfere with, or place unreasonably burdensome or restrictive measures or requirements upon development of the Project; or ( c) impose additional dedications, infrastructure or public improvement obligations, fees, or exactions in excess of those identified in this Agreement. (b) The following modifications shall be considered "Major Modifications" and shall require an amendment to this Agreement.
sf-3456544 6

Page 160 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
(i) Any change in proposed setbacks by more than ten (10) percent; (ii) Any increase in total square footage by more than ten (10) percent or reallocation among the various uses approved as part of the Project Approvals by more than ten (10) percent;
(iii) Any increase in the height of the buildings allowed in Phase I beyond that approved by the Height Variance;
(iv) Any new use not approved as part of the Project Approvals. ( c) Developer acknowledges that any change to either Precise Plan Review will require a modification to such approval, even if the change does not amount to a Major Modification under this section.
( d) Throughout the term of this Agreement, Developer shall have the right, at its election and without risk to any right that is vested pursuant to this Agreement, to apply to City for modifications and amendments to the Project Approvals and any future approvals that may be granted to Developer. The approval or conditional approval of any such modification or amendment which does not constitute a Major Modification shall not require an amendment to this Agreement, provided that, in addition to any other findings that may be required, a finding is made that the modification or amendment is consistent with this Agreement. Any such modification or amendment shall be deemed incorporated into this Agreement at the time it becomes effective.
( e) The provisions of this Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between City and Developer. During the Term of this Agreement, clarifications to this Agreement and the Applicable Rules may be appropriate with respect to the details of performance of City and Developer. If and when, from time to time, during the terms of this Agreement, City and Developer agree that such clarifications are necessary or appropriate, they shall effectuate such clarification through operating memoranda approved in writing by City and Developer, which, after execution, shall be attached hereto and become part of this Agreement and the same may be further clarified from time to time as necessary with future written approval by City and the Developer. Operating memoranda are not intended to and shall not constitute an amendment to this Agreement but are mere ministerial clarifications, therefore public notices and hearings shall not be required. The authority to enter into such operating memoranda is hereby delegated to the Community Development Director, with approval by the City Attorney, and the Community Development Director is hereby authorized to execute any operating memoranda hereunder without further City Council action.

7. Fees and Permits for the Project.
(a) During the term of this Agreement, the Impact Fees charged for the Project shall be those in existence as of, and in the amount in effect as of, the date of the application for the Existing Approvals, as shown on the attached Exhibit F. (b) Developer shall be subject to the applicable Construction Codes and shall pay those Processing Fees and Charges which are in effect on a City-wide basis in accordance with the City fee schedule in effect as of the date the application for the particular land use application or permit is presented or the particular plan check is requested to be performed. sf-3456544 7

Page 161 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
(c) Building permits and certificates of occupancy shall be issued by the City after the City's review and approval of Developer's applications therefore, provided that City's review of the applications for such permits and certificates is limited to determining whether the following conditions are met:
(i) The application is complete;
(ii) The application demonstrates that Developer has
complied with the conditions of the Applicable Standards and the Construction Codes; and
(iii) All applicable processing, administrative and legal fees have been paid, subject to the provisions of this Agreement.

8. Cooperation Between Parties in Implementation of this Agreement.

Developer and City shall proceed in a reasonable and expeditious manner, in compliance with the deadlines mandated by applicable agreements, statutes or ordinances, to complete all steps necessary for implementation of this Agreement and development of the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the parties shall cooperate in good faith and work with the Airport Land Use Commission, as necessary, on the development, approval, and implementation of an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Brackett Field Airport that is consistent with and allows for the development of the Project as contemplated in this Agreement. The City shall proceed in an expeditious manner to complete all actions required for the development of the Project, including but not limited to, processing and checking all maps, plans, permits, building plans and specifications and other plans relating to development of the Property filed by Developer or its nominee, successor or assign as necessary for development of the Property. It is the parties' express intent to cooperate with one another and diligently work to implement all land use and building approvals for development of the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

9. Capacity. During the term of this Agreement, City will use its best good faith efforts to provide public utility capacity for sanitary sewer, storm water, and water, in quantities required for full development of the Project, including Phase II, as the same was anticipated and evaluated in the Addendum. During the term of this Agreement, if the City is considering approval of any other proposed development project or projects that could impair the City's ability to maintain sufficient capacity to serve the Project, then the City shall require as a condition of approval that such other project or projects provide and fully fund the fair share of sufficient additional capacity to serve that project or projects, so as not to impair the City's ability to serve the Project, including Phase II. Nothing herein shall prevent the City from taking action to protect the public health or safety, which may include temporary interruptions in service occasioned by utility system maintenance, repair, or upgrade work, provided City shall follow established procedures for advance notice to property owners when practicable, and will at Developer's request coordinate in good faith to minimize disruption to Developer's ongoing business operations.

10. Taxes.
(a) Any subsequently enacted city-wide, generally applicable taxes shall apply to the Property provided that: (1) the application of such taxes to the Property is sf-3456544 8

Page 162 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
prospective; and (2) the application of such taxes would not prevent development in accordance with this Agreement.
(b) Sales and Use Tax.
(i) In the event the contract price for any work on the Project is valued at five million dollars ($5,000,000) or more, Developer agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to file, as applicable, a tax return or other documentation with the State Board of Equalization that reports the City as a registered job site for purchases of tangible personal property made in connection with the finishing of and/or installation of materials or fixtures for the Project.
(ii) Developer further agrees that if Developer retains contractors or subcontractors to perform a portion of work in the Project, and said contracts or subcontracts are valued at five million dollars ($5,000,000) or more, Developer shall encourage its contractors or subcontractors to include in said contracts the provisions set forth in Subsection (a) above. (iii) In addition, Developer will (A) review the direct payment process established by the Board of Equalization and, as provided in (i) above, if eligible, prepare its returns in a manner intended to result in the local share of its use taxes are allocated to City, to the extent allowed by law, and (B) supply the City with a list of vendors which might purchase for the Project any fixture or material with a purchase price exceeding $500,000 which is shipped to the job site by an out of state supplier, and thus may qualify for a direct use tax allocation to the City.

11. Developer's Obligations - Improvements
(a) Developer shall pay its fair share for a future traffic signal at the intersection of Wheeler A venue and Puddingstone Drive which is estimated to be 29%. The estimated cost for this work is $275,000, with 29% of that being $79,750 (the "Traffic Signal Contribution"). Following the Developer's payment of the Traffic Signal Contribution, which was done prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase I, the Developer will have no further obligations for any contributions for the construction of the traffic signal and City shall have no obligation to refund any money to Developer if the fair share estimate of 29% is ultimately determined to be incorrect. Provided that Phase I is completed, Developer shall not be entitled to any reimbursement of this money and the obligations imposed by AB 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code section 66000 et seq.) are not applicable to this payment.

Notwithstanding the above, Developer, or its successor in interest, shall be entitled to a refund if after twenty (20) years from the Effective Date, there are not sufficient warrants to justify the Traffic Signal or the installation of the Traffic Signal has been denied by any other agency with jurisdiction. The funds deposited by Developer shall be used exclusively for this improvement. (b) Developer shall pay its fair share of the cost of a replacement bridge over the Live Oak Flood Control Channel at Puddingstone Drive which is estimated to be 29%. As of the Effective Date, the City's preliminary cost estimate for this work is $1,200,000 under any project development scenario, with 29% of that cost being $348,000 (the "Bridge Contribution"). Developer and City shall mutually agree to a final cost estimate within 60 days of the Effective Date. In the absence of an agreement regarding such final cost estimate, the City's preliminary cost estimate shall become the final cost estimate. Following the Applicant's payment of the Bridge Contribution, which was done prior to the issuance of building permits, sf-3456544 9

Page 163 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
for Phase I, the Developer will have no further obligations for any contributions for the construction of the bridge and City shall have no obligation to refund any money to Developer if the fair share estimate of 29% is ultimately determined to be incorrect. Provided that Phase I is completed, Developer shall not be entitled to any reimbursement of this money and the obligations imposed by AB 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code section 66000 et seq.) are not applicable to this payment. The funds deposited by Developer shall be used exclusively for this improvement.
( c) The Property lies within zone 5 of Citywide Landscape and Lighting District No. 6. The maximum amount that can be billed per parcel cannot exceed $305.71.

Developer shall be responsible for paying the landscaping and lighting district assessment that is applicable to this Property at a rate that is eleven times the rate of a single parcel fee. The City shall be entitled to place this assessment on the tax rolls. This obligation shall continue for the full time that Landscape and Lighting District No. 6 is in existence and such obligation shall survive the expiration of this Agreement.
( d) Developer shall be responsible for designing and constructing the full width of Wheeler A venue with raised median and landscaping from the north property line to Puddingstone Drive, as set forth below. The construction of this street shall either (1) be completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy or (2) Developer shall post improvement bonds as reasonably required by the City for the completion of the work.

Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement of costs relating to the southern half of the street if within ten (10) years from the Effective Date there is construction by others in the vicinity which generates usage of the street improvements constructed by Developer, for which the new construction is required to pay its fair share of the southern portion of the street. The following shall be the full street design dimensions:
(i) One (1) 1 O' Class 1 bike lane on the western side, including curb and gutter.
(ii) One (1) 21' southbound lane (9' of which can later be used for on- street parking).
(iii) One (1) 12' southbound lane.
(iv) One (1) 14' raised center median designed to accommodate the driveways for the development and the planned athletic complex to the west. (v) One (1) 12' northbound lane.
(vi) One ( 1) 21' northbound lane (9' of which can later be used for on- street parking).
(vii) A 10' parkway with a 5' landscape parkway next to the curb and a 5' sidewalk, including curb and gutter.

These improvements shall be detailed on the final street improvement plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and the City Engineer. All improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and City Engineer prior to the issuance of final occupancy for any of the buildings. sf-3456544 10

Page 164 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

12. Developer's Obligations - Other
(a) Property Tax Covenant. Developer, on behalf of itself and its operators and lessees and its and their successors and assigns, covenants and agrees: (i) that the Property and the Project and all improvements, equipment and contents located therein and thereon shall be and remain subject to the assessment and payment of real and personal property taxes, including possessory interest taxes; and (ii) that it shall not apply for or otherwise accept any exemption from the payment of any real or personal property taxes, including possessory interest taxes, unless the in-lieu payments described below are made. In the event Developer or its operators or lessees or its and their successors or assigns are granted any exemption from the payment of real or personal property taxes of any nature, Developer or such successor-in-interest shall pay annually to the City, a payment in lieu of taxes in an amount determined by the City to be equal to the portion of the real and personal property tax levy the City would have received but for the exemption. The payment in lieu of taxes shall be payable on the date that the second installment of property taxes would otherwise have been due and payable. Any payment in lieu of taxes which is not paid when due shall accrue interest at the lesser of ten percent ( 10%) per annum or the highest rate allowed by applicable legal regulations. Within ten ( 10) days following the Effective Date, Developer shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to City, for recordation in the Official Records of Los Angeles County, a declaration of restriction on land in the form attached hereto as Exhibit H, indicating that the Property and the Project shall remain subject to property taxes and that Developer and its successors and assigns shall not apply for an exemption unless applicable in-lieu payments are made, except as provided below. This obligation shall survive the expiration of this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 12(a) or Exhibit H, Developer shall retain the full right and authority to apply for or accept any payment pursuant to the Capital Investment Incentive Program (CIIP) (Cal. Gov. Code Section 51298), or any other payment for reimbursement of real property tax that may be available under any other similar existing or future program or provision of law, and such payment shall not be construed as an exemption from property taxes requiring any payment in lieu of taxes under this Section 12(a) or Exhibit H. Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the City to establish a CUP. (b) Point of Sales. To the extent allowed by law, La Verne shall be listed as the point of sale for any product primarily manufactured at the Property by Developer, its operators and lessees and its and their successors and assigns, and sold from the Property as a retail product. City recognizes that Developer does not intend to offer for sale or sell from the Property any retail products whether manufactured at the Property or manufactured elsewhere.

13. Indemnity. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, and its elected and appointed councils, boards, commissions, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from any and all claims, costs (including legal fees and costs) and liability for any personal injury or property damage which may arise directly or indirectly as a result of any actions or inactions by the Developer, or any actions or inactions of Developer's contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees in connection with the construction, improvement, operation, or maintenance of the Project, provided that Developer shall have no indemnification obligation with respect to (i) negligence or willful misconduct of City, its contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees or with respect to the maintenance, use, condition, or design of any improvement after the time it has been dedicated to and accepted by the City or another public entity ( except as provided in an improvement agreement or maintenance bond), or (ii) those matters to which the City has agreed in this Agreement to indemnify the Developer. sf-3456544 11

Page 165 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

14. Assignment.
(a) Developer may at any time or from time to time transfer or assign all or a portion of its interests, rights, or obligations under this Agreement, subject to approval of the City Council, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. In accordance with Government Code Section 65868.5, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all transferees or assignees approved pursuant to this Section. As a condition precedent to any such transfer, Developer shall require the transferee to acknowledge in writing that transferee has been informed, understands and agrees that the burdens and benefits under this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the transferee in a form similar to that attached hereto as Exhibit G. (b) Within 10 business days after the date escrow closes on any such transfer, or if no escrow is involved the date of the transfer (a "Transfer Date"), Developer shall notify the City in writing of the name and address of the transferee. Upon the completion of Developer's responsibilities pursuant to this Section, Developer shall have no further obligations or benefits hereunder with respect to such transferred property save for those the performance of which was due prior to the Transfer Date. Any transfer which does not comply with the notice requirements of this Section shall not release the Developer from its obligations to the City under this Agreement.

15. Covenants Run With The Land. The terms of this Agreement are legislative in nature, and apply to the Property as regulatory ordinances. During the term of this Agreement, all of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers, standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation or otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees and all other persons or entities acquiring the Property, any lot, parcel or any portion thereof, and any interest therein, whether by sale, operation of law or other manner, and they shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors.

16. Conflict with State or Federal Law. In the event that State or Federal laws or regulations, enacted after the Effective Date, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations. The Agreement shall be deemed modified only to the extent necessary to comply with future state or federal laws or regulations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer shall have the right to challenge, at its sole cost, in a court of competent jurisdiction, the law or regulation preventing compliance with the terms of this Agreement and, if the challenge in a court of competent jurisdiction is successful, this Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. In the event that state or federal laws or regulations enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement or require changes in any of the Applicable Standards, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith in a reasonable attempt to modify this Agreement to comply with such federal or state law or regulation. Any such amendment or suspension of the Agreement shall be approved by the City Council in accordance with the Development Agreement Law.

17. Periodic Review.
(a) During the term of this Agreement, the City shall conduct annual reviews of Developer's good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement in sf-3456544 12

Page 166 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
accordance with the Applicable Standards and the Development Agreement Law. The annual reviews shall be conducted every twelve (12) months from the Effective Date according to the procedures in this Section 17.
(b) At least ninety (90) days prior to each anniversary of the Effective Date, Developer shall provide documentation of its good faith compliance with this Agreement during the previous twelve (12) months ( or, for the first annual review, for a portion thereof commencing on the Effective Date).
( c) If the City finds Developer to be in compliance with this Agreement, City shall, upon written request of Developer, issue a Certificate of Agreement Compliance ("CAC") to Developer stating that after the most recent annual review that (i) this Agreement remains in effect and (ii) Developer is in compliance with the Agreement. The CAC shall be in recordable form and shall contain information necessary to communicate constructive record notice of compliance. Developer may, but is not required to, record the CAC with the County Recorder at Developer's expense. Additionally, Developer may at any time request from the City a similar certificate stating, in addition to the foregoing, which obligations under this Agreement have been fully satisfied with respect to the Property or any lot or unit within the Property. (d) If the City finds based on substantial evidence that Developer is not in good faith compliance with this Agreement, the City shall inform Developer as to where Developer is not in compliance with this Agreement. The Parties shall meet and confer within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice to attempt in good faith to agree on the procedures or actions needed to cure the noncompliance. If agreement cannot be reached or Developer disagrees with the City's assessment, the Community Development Director shall prepare a written report and refer the matter to the City Council. City shall notify Developer in writing at least ten ( 10) days prior to the date and time at which the matter will be considered, and Developer may submit evidence of its good faith compliance. If the City Council determines based on substantial evidence that Developer may not be in compliance with this Agreement, the City Council may continue the hearing to allow Developer to resolve the matter before taking any action. If the City Council finds based on substantial evidence that Developer is in good faith compliance with this Agreement, the provisions of subsection (c) shall apply. If the City Council finds based on substantial evidence that Developer is not in good faith compliance with this Agreement, the procedures for default, notice and cure as specified in Sections 19 and 20 shall apply.
(e) City's failure to review, at least annually, compliance by Developer with the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not constitute or be asserted by any Party as a breach by any other Party of this Agreement.

18. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This Agreement may be further amended or terminated only in writing and in the manner set forth in Government Code Sections 65865.1, 65868, 65869.5 and the Development Agreement Law. No change or amendment of any of the Applicable Standards shall require an amendment of this Agreement.

19. Agreement is Entire Agreement. This Agreement and all exhibits attached hereto or incorporated herein contain the sole and entire Agreement between the parties concerning the Property and Project. The parties acknowledge and agree that neither of them has made any representation with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement or any representations inducing the execution and delivery hereof, except representations set forth sf-3456544 13

Page 167 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
herein. The parties further acknowledge that all statements or representations that heretofore may have been made by either of them to the other are void and of no effect.

20. Events of Default.
(a) Developer shall be in default under this Agreement (an "Event of Default") upon the happening of one or more of the following events:
(i) If a warranty, representation or written statement contained in any agreement or application made or furnished by Developer to the City is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made if the City shows that such warranty, representation or written statement would have had a material, adverse effect on the City's willingness to enter into this Agreement;
(ii) A finding and determination by the City made following an annual review under the procedure provided for in Government Code Section 65865.1 and the Development Agreement Law that, upon the basis of substantial evidence, Developer has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; or (iii) Developer fails to fulfill any of its material obligations set forth in this Agreement.
(b) City shall be in default under this Agreement (an "Event of Default") upon the happening of one or more of the following events:
(i) If a warranty, representation or written statement made or furnished by City to Developer is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made if the Developer shows that such warranty, representation or statement would have had a material, adverse effect on the Developer's willingness to enter into this Agreement; or (ii) City fails to fulfill any of its material obligations set forth in this Agreement.

21. Procedure Upon Default.
(a) The party alleging an Event of Default shall give the other party written notice of any Event of Default under this Agreement, which shall reasonably describe the alleged Event of Default, and the defaulting party shall have ninety (90) days after the date of receipt of the notice to cure the Event of Default or to reasonably commence the procedures or actions needed to cure the Event of Default. The parties shall meet and confer within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice to attempt in good faith to agree on the procedures or actions needed to cure the Event of Default.
(b) With respects to Developer defaults, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default not cured by Developer, City may terminate or modify this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65865.1 and the Development Agreement Law. ( c) Subject to any limitations on remedies set forth in this Agreement, the party alleging an Event of Default shall not be deemed to have waived any claim of defect in the performance of the defaulting party if the non-defaulting party does not propose to terminate this Agreement.
s~3456544 14

Page 168 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
( d) No waiver or failure by City or Developer to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any provision of this Agreement or of any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision.
( e) Any actions for breach of this Agreement shall be decided in a court of competentjurisdiction located in Los Angeles County, California. (f) City's sole remedy for an uncured default by Developer of this Agreement shall be termination of this Agreement. Developer may pursue all remedies at law or in equity for an uncured default by City of the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing to the contrary, the party in default shall not be liable for consequential damages suffered by the other party.

22. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If legal action by either party is brought because of breach of this Agreement or to enforce a provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs. In the event of any administrative, legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any person, entity or organization challenging the validity of the Project, this Agreement, any Subsequent Approval, or the sufficiency of any environmental review, the parties agree to cooperate with each other in the defense of any such challenge. In the event City and Developer are unable to select mutually agreeable legal counsel to defend such action or proceeding, each may select its own legal counsel. Notwithstanding the above, City and Developer agree that City may, at its sole option, tender the complete defense of any such third party challenge to the Developer, and upon acceptance of such tender by Developer, Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless City against any and all fees and costs arising out of the defense of such challenge and shall control the defense. Should Developer refuse to accept such a tender by the City, City may defend such action or proceeding and if City so defends, Developer shall indemnify and hold City harmless from all attorneys' fees related to such defense.

23. Severability. If any term or condition of this Agreement is for any reason held by a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, then this Agreement shall continue to be valid unless the provision that is found to be invalid constitutes a material change in the consideration for this Agreement, in which case, at the election by written notice of the party adversely affected by such change, this entire Agreement shall likewise be invalid, and shall be deemed null and void and of no further force or effect following such judicial determination.

24. No Third Parties Benefited. No person other than the City, Developer, or their respective successors is intended to or shall have any right or claim under this Agreement, this Agreement being for the sole benefit and protection of the parties hereto and their respective successors. Similarly, no amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall require the consent or acknowledgment of any person not a party or successor in interest to a party to this Agreement.

25. Binding Effect of Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties originally named herein and their respective successors and assigns.

26. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that this Agreement is a contract that has been negotiated and voluntarily entered into by City and Developer and that the Developer is sf-3456544 15

Page 169 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
not an agent of City. The parties do not intend to create a partnership, joint venture or any other joint business relationship by this Agreement. The City and Developer hereby renounce the existence of any form of joint venture or partnership between them, and agree that nothing contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making the City and Developer joint venturers or partners. Neither Developer nor any of Developer's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of City in connection with the performance of Developer's obligations under this Agreement.

27. Bankruptcy. The obligations of this Agreement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy.

28. Mortgagee Protection: Certain Rights of Cure.
(a) This Agreement shall be superior and senior to all liens placed upon the Property or portion thereof after the date on which this Agreement is recorded, including the lien of any deed of trust or mortgage ("Mortgage"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, no breach hereof shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value, but all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and effective against all persons and entities, including all deed of trust beneficiaries or mortgagees ("Mortgagees") who acquire title to the Property or any portion thereof by foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise. No foreclosing Mortgagee shall have any obligation or duty under this Agreement to construct or complete the construction of any improvements required by this Agreement, or to pay for or guarantee construction or completion thereof. City, upon receipt of a written request therefore from a foreclosing Mortgagee, shall permit the Mortgagee to succeed to the rights and obligations of Developer under this Agreement, provided that all defaults by Developer hereunder that are reasonably susceptible of being cured are cured by the Mortgagee as soon as is reasonably possible, or Mortgagee provides assurances reasonably satisfactory to City that such defaults will be cured. The foreclosing Mortgagee thereafter shall comply with all of the provisions of this Agreement.
(b) City acknowledges that the lenders providing financing to Developer may require certain Agreement interpretations and/or modifications to this Agreement and City agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Developer and representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification. Subject to compliance with applicable laws, City shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided City reasonably determines such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement.

29. Notice of Default to Mortgagee. If City receives notice from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to Developer hereunder and specifying the address for service thereof, City shall deliver to the Mortgagee concurrently with service thereof to Developer, all notices given to Developer describing all claims by the City that and Event of Default has occurred, or will, after the expiration of any applicable cure period, occur. If City determines that Developer is in noncompliance with this Agreement, City also shall serve the written notice of noncompliance on the Mortgagee, concurrently with service thereof on Developer. Each Mortgagee shall have the right for a period of ninety (90) days after receipt of such Notice of Noncompliance to cure or remedy, or to commence to cure or remedy, the condition of default claimed or the areas of noncompliance set forth in City's notice. sf-3456544 16

Page 170 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

30. Estoppel Certificate. Either party from time to time may deliver written notice to the other party requesting written certification that, to the knowledge of the certifying party (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect and constitutes a binding obligation of the parties; (ii) this Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing, or, if it has been amended or modified, specifying the nature of the amendments or modifications; and (iii) the requesting party is not in default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or if in default, describing therein the nature and monetary amount, if any, of the default. A party receiving a request hereunder shall execute and return the certificate within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof. The City Manager of the City shall have the right to execute the certificates requested by Developer hereunder. City acknowledges that a certificate hereunder may be relied upon by permitted transferees and Mortgagees. At the request of the Developer, the certificates provided by City establishing the status of this Agreement with respect to the Property shall be in recordable form, and Developer shall have the right to record the certificate at its cost.

31. Force Maieure. Except as otherwise provided herein, City and Developer shall be excused, for the period of any delay in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder, when prevented from so doing by certain causes beyond its control, major weather differences from the normal weather conditions in the La Verne, California area, war, terrorism, insurrection, strikes, walk-outs, lock-outs, inability to obtain labor or supplies, riots, unusually heavy or extended periods of rain, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, governmental restrictions, State or Federally-declared disasters or emergencies affecting the Property, acts or failure to act of any governmental entity ( except that the acts or failure to act of the City shall not excuse performance by City), enactment of conflicting state or federal laws or regulations, discovery of significant geologic, seismic, hydrologic, or paleontologic problems on the Property, discovery of heretofore unknown soils, asbestos, underground storage tanks, or other environmental or hazardous wastes problem, litigation filed with respect to this Agreement, the Project, or the Property, by a person, firm or entity that is not a party to this Agreement resulting in an order or final decision which prevents performance under this Agreement, or other bases for excused performance that are not within the control of the party to be excused. Upon the request of either party hereto, an extension of time for such cause shall be granted in writing for the period of the enforced delay, or longer as may be mutually agreed upon.

32. Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous Terms.
(a) The singular includes the plural; the masculine gender includes the feminine; "shall" is mandatory, "may" is permissive.
(b) Time is and shall be of the essence in this Agreement. ( c) Where a party to this Agreement consists of more than one person, each such person shall be jointly and severally liable for the performance of such party's obligation hereunder.
(d) The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of this Agreement and do not in any way limit or amplify the provisions thereof. ( e) This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California in effect on the date thereof. sf-3456544 17

Page 171 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
(t) Should any provision of this Agreement be found to be in conflict with any provision of the Project Approvals, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail over the Project Approvals.

33. Exhibits
Exhibit A - Legal Description
Exhibit B - DRC Conditional Approval Letter
Exhibit C - Resolution No. 113 8
Exhibit D - Resolution No. 1139
Exhibit E- Ordinance No. 1067
Exhibit F - Impact Fees & City Fee Resolution No. 14-22 Exhibit G - Assignment Agreement

34. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement be in writing and delivered in person, delivered by reputable same-day or overnight messenger that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid. Notices personally delivered or delivered by messenger shall be effective upon receipt. Notices sent by mail shall be effective as of Noon on the third business day following deposit with the United States Postal Service.

Notice required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follow:
with a copy to:

City of La Verne
Attention: Hal Fredericksen, Community Development Director 3660 "D" Street
La Verne, CA 91750
Wallin, Kress, Reisman & Kranitz
Attention: Robert L. Kress
2800 28th Street, Suite 315
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Notices required to be given to Developer shall be addressed as follows:
sf-3456544
Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Attention: VP of Facilities and Operations
333 Lakeside Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
18

Page 172 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
with a copy to:
with a copy to:

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Attention: General Counsel (HS)
333 Lakeside Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
Zane 0. Gresham
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
A party may change its address for notice by giving notice in writing to the other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

35. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same instrument.

36. Section Headings. All headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

37. Covenant Not to Sue. The parties to this Agreement, and each of them, agree that this Agreement and each term hereof is legal, valid, binding, and enforceable. The parties to this Agreement, and each of them, hereby covenant and agree that each of them will not commence, maintain, or prosecute any claim, demand, cause of action, suit, or other proceeding against the other party to this Agreement, in law or in equity, based on an allegation, or asset in any action, that this Agreement or any term hereof is void, invalid, or unenforceable.

38. Recordation of Agreement. This Agreement shall be recorded with in the Official Records of Los Angeles County by the City Clerk within the time required by Government Code Section 65868.5. Amendments approved by the parties, and any termination or cancellation of this Agreement, shall be similarly recorded.

39. Joint Preparation. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been prepared jointly and equally by the Parties, and it shall not be construed against any Party on the ground that the Party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared.

40. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement is made, entered into, and executed in the County of Los Angeles, California, and the laws of the State of California shall govern its interpretation and enforcement. Any action, suit or proceeding related to, or arising from, this Agreement shall be filed in the appropriate court having jurisdiction in the County of Los Angeles.
[Signatures on foll owing page]
sf-3456544 19

Page 173 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed and entered into by the parties as of the Agreement Date.
sf-3456544 20

CITY OF LA VERNE,

DEVELOPER
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

Page 174 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this
certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of Los Angeles
On April 6, 2016, before me, -------------Lupe Gaeta Estrella, Notary Public--------------------- personall y appeared -----------Don Kendrick------------------------------------------------------------- w ho proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person()9.__whose name()JJ_is!a\e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/~~ executed the same in his/ltey2thooswthorized capacity~, and that by his¥fth~atureM-.on the instrument the person~ or the entity upon behalf of which the perso~acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
• Signaturd ~ cl ~~Seal)
sf-3456544

Page 175 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California
County of San Mateo )
before me Stephanie Dong, Notary Public
'-------------------(insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared __________ K_e_v_in_Y_o_u_n_g _____________ __, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s,Ywhose name~ is/aye subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/speAhey executed the sa'me in his/hjr/t~ir authorized capacity(~, and that by his/h~/t~ir signatufe(~ on the instrument the penfon{y>, or the entity upon betfalf of which the person~ acted, execu(ed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Seal)

Page 176 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
sf-3456544

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
BOOK~ PAGE_11_
sc.-.LE ,· .. 100·
22 1~9 ACRES
1 NUMBERED LOT
TRACT NO. 72987
=
!. ~:il'f"u':ls~51~~rg:::"'W.:~01
< Dfll\lLSH("(~ AR(>l()l JO~CAU
fCUID1"1.P.TA.OO£D"L57071!",
r~~&fr::t ~Q<jwiffC \~-., ..

IN lliE CITY Of LA VERNE
COUNTY Of LOS ANGELES
STAlE Of CALIFORNIA
BASIS Of BEARINGS
ll1l" 11£-GS ~ >,Olfl]<j IMf. IIA!Ul OIi 111:
llflJl!IOIJCll<lllll'Olf711 .. 0.-ll'CCflfl[lllJll(Of"
~~o~~~~-744~711
...-__._.. IIIOICAll:S lit( Ba."1Alfl or ll1l" LUID
SUIDWXOB'l'l!;Gij/#
I ._:..

I ~"">'
111 IIIDICAT[S fiCCOFIO ~ PO IIS8
,~r,~76
112 ll'OCATCS~OOROOIWENSl~PUI
Tl!ll,CTP«l 71728118 1J73f7~76
SIIP" ~o-€D.l!OlfW!ll.
(~) IIOCAlES A A-'ID!.U. !IE-"lMC.

IIOCAltS FOUll0 WCNMIIT M 1101£11
(D INQICATES rClllolll 1" IRON PFC TA,GGCD
lS"6M.'1.USH,PCRR2.
;/
I
,~!~)
LOI'!
90$,IIOl S.f

22.1at9AC
It •
I ', I _1
•I
!/ R)·
., . , , §I f,
J~-
6 I ,
ID~
n1n·
\ \
'~J o do
,·,. 100'
~
fWIOD7"E!IIASS.U:
~ COOl(I[ SlMM'D
'C<UITV5Ul\00RII£
IJ" llN. !.O' PP 111,
I
'·•:1------
i•.

I •
: ~
I
I
s
i1
i

Page 177 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
sf-3623410
i

EXHIBIT B

DRC CONDITIONAL APPROVAL LETTER
I August 5, 2014
Dan Rosenberg
FPBA
4499 Ruffin Rd. Ste. 300
San Diego, CA 92123

CITY OF LA VERNE

CITY HALL
3660 "D" Street. La Verne, California 91750-3599
www.ci.la-verne.ca.us
SUBJECT: Case No. 56-14PPR- CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
Gilead La Verne Campus - Wheeler Ave. and Puddingstone Dr.

Dear Mr. Rosenberg:

The Development Review Committee has considered your application for the development ofup to a 400,000 s.f. building for a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility for Gilead Sciences. In accordance with chapter 18.16 of the La Verne Municipal Code, your project has been conditionally approved based upon the following findings:
i I. The subject application is consistent with the general plan and conforms to all specific plans, zoning, and other applicable ordinances and subdivision requirements and resolutions.

The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan as it is for the development of a vacant 23-acre parcel for pharmaceutical manufacturing, which is a permitted use within the Business Park zone of the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan and consistent within the Commercial/Business Park designation of the city's General Plan. A separate application, 58-I 4V AR, is a requested variance for the height of portions of the building as well as the perimeter retaining walls, and will need to be ultimately approved for the proposed project to be built.

2. The site is safe, functional and environmentally sensitive to the surroundings, Grading, where required, minimizes environmental damage to the extent possible.

The project has been designed to ensure that the site is safe, functional, and environmentally sensitive to the surroundings. An addendum to a previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration for the site was prepared and is part of this approval.

The architecture proposed observes community standards and protects the character of the adjacent development.

General Administration 909/596-8726 • Water Customer Service 909/596-8744 • Parks & Community Services 909/596-8700 Public Wor1<s 909/596-8741 • Finance 909/596-8716 • Community Development 909/596-8706 • Building 909/596-8713 Police Department 909/596-1913 • Fire Department 009/596-5991 • General Fax 909/596-8737

Page 178 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Case No. 56-14PPR -Gilead Sciences
August 5, 2014
Page2
The proposed architectural of the buildings will be compatible with the adjacent business park, while also providing for a unique design with different materials that will provide a more modern design.

4. The landscaping plan ensures visual relief, providing an attractive environment for the public's enjoyment.

The proposed landscaping for the site is well-thought out, drought tolerant, and will provide visual relief to the buildings and the overall site. The project also includes a perimeter walking trail for employees to use for exercise during the day.

5. Defensible space measure to provide a safe environment.

The proposed project includes perimeter fencing and 24-hour security which will ensure a safe environment. The project also complies with the requirements of the FAA in relation to Brackett Air Field.

Approval of Case No. 56-I 4PPR is subject to the conditions of approval attached to this letter.

The approval of Case No. 56-14PPR is subject to a ten (10) day appeal period commencing from the date of this letter. Should you desire any further information, please contact Eric Scherer of my staff at (909) 596-8706.

Sincerely,
Hal G. Fredericksen
Community Development Director
By: Eric Scherer, AICP
Principal Planner
Enclosure:

C:
sf-3623410
Conditions of Approval
Affidavit
Standard Conditions
Building Department

Page 179 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

EXHIBIT C
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1138
RESOLUTJOK NO. 1 l 38
2 3
4 /\ RESOUJTWN OF TllE PLANNING COMMlSSlON OF THE CH'Y OF LA VERNE, 'i COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE or CALIFORNIA, APPROVrNG CASE NO. 57- 6 14TTM. TE'\ITA UVE TRACT MAP 72987, A REQUEST BY FERGUSON PAPE 7 BALDWIN ARCHITECTS TO Mb.KGE l 2 VACANT LOTS AND VACATE A Pl JBLIC ~ STREET TNTO A 23-ACRE PARCEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CA,\.1PUS FOR A 9 PllARMJ\CEllT1Ct\J. COMPANY ANO ADOPTING TH.E PREPARED AJlDE?\DIJM TO 10 'I1lE PREVIOUSLY ADOJlTF.D rvmlGATEDNFGA'I1VR DECLAR/\'110N FOR THE ll PROJECT
12 1.1 \\1-IFREAS, F<.:rguson Pape Baldwin Architects (Applicant) submitted an applicatiun for a 14 tcntatiw tract map to merge 12 vacant lots and vacate a puhlic street that was P«'"·ionsly I 5 recorded for an approved project (La Vemc Technology and Trade Center} for the ,6 constrnctfrm ofn campus for a phamu1-0eutical company (Gile,ld Sciences, lm:.) and 17 l8 WIIHREAS, Government Code Section 654-02 requires I.hat the Planning Commission 19 review proposed stre~l vacation~ and thc·ir wnformancc with the City's 1idoptcd Gcriernl Plan; 20 and
21 22 WHERE.AS. Section 16.16.115 oftbc La Verne Municipal Codc authorizes the Plarming 1l Comrni&sion to hear and grant n:qucsts for tentative maps; and 25 \VHEREAS, the Development Review Committee reviewed the application and 26 rt:i:ommen.dcd approval subject to certain conditions attached and made a part h~!r~in; and 27 28 WHEREAS, a notice ofpuhlic hearing was published in the lnlond Valley Daily Bulk!in 29 on August I, 20 ! 4 and mailct.! to all owners of property withln 300 feet of the subject property JO on July 29, 2014; and
33 J7
38 w
·111
41 WI lEREAS. an addt.·m.lum to tl)e previ0usly adopted Mitiguwd "'\cgative Lk~clamtion wa~ prepared for the project in oc4;orduncc with the C~lifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the La Vi:me Environm<:!ntal Gui<lelines finding no additional significant cnvimmnental impacts res'.1hing from the project proposal provided that the mitigation measures are adnpted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission i:xmducted a duly noticed public hearing and c.onsidcrcd public testimony on August 13, 2014, in ac.cnrdancc with the provisions oflhc.• La Verne Municipal Code.
42 NO\\/, 'OTEREFORE, HE lT RESOLVFD by the Planning Commission of the City of 4) La Verne as fiJllnws.:
44 ,t~ Section 1. In connection with Tentative "tvfop No. 72987, the Planning Commission of the 46 City n!'Lu Verne HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES as follows:
47 Pagt 1 or 4
sf-3623410

Page 180 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
I. Tht'. ttntative tract map is con!li.~tent with the appUcable general and specific 2 plans as spc-cified in Section 65451, including proyisioru in the housing element governing the provi~ions uf affordable housing.
4 5
f,
7 s
10 Finding: The proposed tentative trn.ct map will be consistent with the City General Plari and Zoni.ng Code in that the projtx~ site ·will he developed as a campus for a pharmaceutical company and med the minimum rcqu.irements of the wne. l11e suhdivlsion is consistent with the General Plan und the Arrow Corridor Specif.ic Plan (SP84-l:n.
1 l 2. The design or irnprove-ment of the subdh·ision i& consi~tent with the Genera) Pian 12 and any applicable sp«ific plan.
u
14 Finding: The design of the project and improvements arc consistent witb the General I 'i Plan and the Specific Phm, The project is for a campus f()r a pharmaceutical company 16 and is consislCmt ,vith the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan. 17 1 x 3. The tentati'n tract map meets the requirements of the zoning t-ode. 19 20
21 22
23 24
Finding: The zoning code requires a development of this kind to meet certain development standards. Tite proposed projt:i.:1 meets those development standards (with the accompanying variance···· Case No. 58-14VAR}, and this Tract ~up complies with the requirements of the Ar.row Corridor Specific Plan. :.t, 4. l'bc ~ite i!I phlskaHy suitable for the proposed density of devlllopmcnt.

Finding: The proposed project i:, consistent with the exb1ing surrmmding indusl.rial development in scale and density.
30 5. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvement!! are nut likely to cause 31 substantial cnYinmmtntal damage and a,,.oidably injure fo,h or wildlife or their 32 habitat.
1 5
J6
37 38
.39
Finding: An lnitial Srndy was previously prepared fnr the previm:s project for chis same site pursumn to 1he Cal,fomia E:wironmemal ()uality Act {CEQA). Public Resoun;<.-s Code Se.ction 21000 ct seq., and the City of La Verne Envirnmnemal Guidelines. As this pro;jcd is similar in scope to the pre\ioU.'i project, and addendum to the previously adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Dt-clarntion wns preparcxf for the propose<l prnject. 'Jbe addendum found U1at the proposed pro_iect would nnt have any new potential impacts and wouJd not require any new mitigation merui-7..ltcs.

The environmental assessment found no substantial evidence that the projt'.Gt would have u significant effect on the environment, including fo,h, wildlife, or their habitats as long as tl,e proposed mitigation measures arc implemented, ,15 6. Tbli d~ig.n of the subdivision is consistent with City engineering standanb and 46 policies and is not likely to cause public health problems. 47 sf-3623410

Page 181 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 J
4 Finding: The design of the subdivision witl be made consistent 'A-ith City engineering stlmdards and policies thruugh review by the City Engineer. and is Il{lt likely to cause public health problems.
i 7. The desiin of the subdivision or type of im.provements wm not conflict with 6 ense~nb acquired by the public at large, or access through or use of, property 7 within the proposed subdh•isfon,
K
9 ll
Finding; Any casement~ will n-0t be built upon but will meet 1hc ret"JLiiremenl'1 of the agency with authority OVl+r the easement
12 8. Discharge of wastes rrom the proposed prnjed will not r<.-sulC in violatic>n nf l 3 exi.-.ting requirements as prescri~d by the Californaa Regional Wieter Quality 14 Control Board.
15 16
17 Vindirrg: 'l11e project shall comply with all \Vater Quality Control Board rcquircmi;.~nts. l& 9. The subject property is not band subject lo a contract pursuant to the California 19 Land Cooserution Act.
20 :!l
23 Finding: The property fa. not under a c-0ntroct pursuant to the California I.and Conservation Act.
:A 10. The dt..'Si:go or the swbdi'\·ision reduces the defideucy in housing allocation as h qualified in the City's Housing Element.
28 29
30 Finding: The prnject is a campus for a pharmaceutical company and is located within the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan's Business Park zone. The property ,,..a.., not pn.-:viou.'!ly considered for residential development.
11 11. 'fht proposed street vacation is in conformat1ce with the City's adopted Genera) 32 P~n in accordan4,!e w·ith Section 65402 of the California Govcn1meut Code. n
14 Finding, The proposed street vacation as part of the tentative tract map is consist4,'llt 35 with the City's General Plan as the dedicated public street was never cnnstmcted and J6 never utilized by the public. The street wa<; only created a year ago (Tract Map 37 71726) for an industrial project that was never constructed. The proposed project does 38 not require the previou:s.ly recorded public street. 39 40 Section 2. The Planning Commission oft.he City of La Verne HEREBY APPROVES 41 Case No. 57-14Tl'M, ·fT72987, pursuant w California Government Code Scc.tfrm 66452.2 42 and 1hc La Verne Mm1.icipal Code based on the above findings and subject to the attached ,B conditions of approval (Exhibit A).
44 -.5 Section J. Thf Planning Commission HEREBY ADOPTS the prcpa.red addendum to the 4-6 previously ndopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project in acctHdance with the 47 California Environmental Qual.ity Act and the La Verne Environmental Guidelines. 48 Re~nl ut ion N,,. I I 3 8
sf-3623410

Page 182 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Sec.lion 4. The Chainnan sha!I sign and the SC>Gretary shall attest to the adoption of 2 Resolution No. I l 38.

J
...

J
9 10
! I
12 p
14 15
16 ,A, PPROVEIJ AND ADOPTED llus l3
1 h day of Au[:!ust, 2014, b)· the Planning
Commission at La Verne, California .
~ Chairperson, Pl
ATTEST:
sf-3623410

Page 183 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1139
sf-3623410

Page 184 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 RESOLUTION NO. 1139
i
:i
5 A RESOLUTION OF TUE PLANNING COM\.flSSION OF THE CITY 01' LA VERNE, (, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATf: OF CALffORNIA GRANTING A HEIGHT 7 VARIANCE FOR THE BU1LO!NGS AND REl'AINlKO WALLS, LOCAIBD ON A & VACANT 23-ACRE PARCEL (1800 WHEELER AVENUE) (CASE NO. 58-14VAR), AND 9 ADOPTTKG THE PREPARED ADDENDUM TO Tl IE PREV!OUSL Y ADOPTED lO MlTIGATED NEGAI !VI:. DEC! .ARATfON PURSlJA':-,lT TO THE CAUfl)R_'l<,,,llA l ! ENVIRONl'vlENTAL QUAUTY /\CT
12 11 WI IEREAS, foert'1lson Pape Baldwin Architects, have submitted an application for a 14 varian~e frum the height limitations uf the Arrow Corridor Spcdtic Plan for the proposed 15 buildings and nJ<)t:.rop t'(jUipment for a campu.'i for a pharmaceutical company (Gilead 16 Sciences, Inc.) and for the proposed retaining walls for the prc~ject; and 17 18 \\'lTERE/\S, Sections HUOS.010 through 18.108.180 of the La Verne Municipal 19 Code authorize lhc Planning Commission to consider such requests subject to certain 20 findings: and
2!
11 \VHEREAS, the Development Review Committee rt-x:ommi::nded. on August 5, 20 l 4, 2~ Planning Commb,sion approval of the application; and 24 25 \\TIEREAS, an addendum to the previously adopted Mitiv.,nted Ncgahve Declaration 26 for the project was prepared per CEQA; and
78 WHFREA8, the Planning Commission conducted a pulllic hearin[i! on August 11,

7.'i 2014 and nx:civctl wrincn and vcrbnl testimony; and JO
3 l \.Vl lEREAS, this mancr was advertim in the Inland Valley Daily Bulteti11 nn August 12 I, 2014, nnd mailed to all property m,ncrs within 300 feet cm July 29, 2014. n
34 NOW, THEREfORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission oftlw Cily of 35 La Vcmc a'l follows:
:%
37 Section l. Th(; Planning Crnnmission HEREBY FINDS AND DETER:\11~10:s that the 38 project satisfies the requirements for the granting of the variance HS i.et forth in Section ~9 18.108Jl40 rifthc La Verne Munldpal Code as f.:lllows:
40 .if 1. Finding Any variance granted will be su~ject to such conditions as \'\'ill assure that the 42 adjustmcm thereby .authorized shall not c.oustitute a grant of ."-pt.~ial priYilcgc inconsistent ,0 with the hmitation.'l uptm other properties in the vicinity and zooc in which tht" subject 44 prop~rty is situated.
45 46 f'act: Conditions of approval ensure that the adjustment "'ill not constitute a gr.ant 4 7 of spt><:ial ,,rivilege inconsistent with the limltalions upon other properties in the ~8 ,,idnity in that the purpose of the \'arianc:e is to aUo"' a 3-&'tory building orup to ssi w in he.igbt and to provide adequate roof.top screening for the roof-top equipment ur, sf-3623410

Page 185 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
to 75' in height with significant setbacks from the public r1gbt ofway. The size of t:hr 2 property (:23 acres) allows for the si~nirJ£ant sethack11 (a.pproximatdy 170') from J "''heeler A "·enoo, and the scah~ of the building is proportion11te with the s~e of the 4 property. ln addition, a retaining w1dl of tll) to 12' in height is rt(1ui~d as the nature 5 of the operations of the business rcqulre that the bllildin~ on the site all bt 6 conneded and be con!ltructcd at the same grade so that then are no steps or ramps 7 on tbe ground floor uf the fadlitJ. The propoM.-d retaining walls will aUow the site to 8 be gnded flat. The conditions of approval ensure that the retaining wall will btl 9 aesthetically J>~sing.
!O
l l 2. Finding: Recause: of spt-'\:tal circumstances applicnh!e lo the subject property, including !2 siu, shape. topography, location~ or surroundin.gs, the strict application ofthi.s til..le is 13 found lo de.privc the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the H vicinity and under identical zoning classifications.
15 t f> Fact: Ail the site is along Whttlu A \·enue, the Arrow Corridor Spt,'Cific Plau ! 7 specifies a maximum buildi11g height of 30'. :tfo~·n·cr, as the sHe is being developed 18 as one parcel, and with the proposed st'tbaek from WheeJer A,,e. (appruxioulfcly 19 170'), the scale and height of the building L, cunsistent with the intention of the 20 Arron· Corridor Specific Plan. A si,tbtline study was prepared for the project to '.1 l illustrate how the roof~tOJl ~uipmcnt will be adequately screened from Whcdt~r 21 Avenue.
24 3. finding: The gnm1it)g of this variane.<.: will not he matcriully di:trimenlal to the public n \\'Clfare or injurious m the olh .. ~ propcnies or improvements in the vicinity and zone in 2t, whii.:h the subj.;ct property is located.
?7
:111 l<'act: Tbt: variance will not be detrim,intal to the public welfare or injurious to other 29 properties io the Yidnity. The proposed .,,·ariaott wUJ allow the proposed huildings JO to exceed the maximum bc~t of the zone and allow for retaining "'alb up to 12' in 31 height. The proposed buildings, roof-mp equipment, and retaining "'·alh will all be n runsistent tn scale to the surrounding properties and tJ.e.,,·elopment and will he a J3 posim'e addition to the surrouncling busioeu park.
34 n ii. li'lnding; The granting uf this variance will not be C•1ntrary to the objectives of any pun % uf the adopted general plan.
38 Fact: Granting or the variance win not be contrary to objc<:tives of the general plan 39 in that it wiU !I.imply allow buildings abd retaining walls to exceed the maximum 40 height allowed by the Arrow Corridor Spedfit> Plan and La Verne Municipal Code. 41 42 Section :2, ·rhe Planning Commission HEREBY ADOPTS th~ prepared addendum to 4J the previously adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Dedaration pun;uant to the Clllifomia 44 En vironmcntal Quality Ai:!.
4"i
46 Section 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Case N(l. 58-14VAR 4 7 based on the findings and subject to the con<lition.'l of approval attached a.-; Exhibit A. -18
Resohition No. I lJ9
sf-3623410

Page 186 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 :i S(;,ction 4. n," Chairman shall :'iign and the Secretary shall attest to the approval of 4 R,~8olution No. I I 39.
7 8
9 j{)
IJ
12 n
APPROVfJJ AND ADOPTED this 13th day of A.ugust, 2014, by the Planning Commission at La Verne. Califomia
14 ATfEST:
[J~//1 /11. ~--18
19 Secretary, Planning Commission
sf-3623410

Page 187 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
sf-3623410

EXHIBIT E
ORDINANCE NO. 1167

Page 188 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 ORDINANCE NO. 1067

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO. 79-14DA, A REQUEST BY GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LA VERNE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING FACILITY AT 1800 WHEELER AVENUE WHEREAS, Gilead Sciences, Inc., the applicant, has received entitlements and is currently under construction of the first phase (approximately 320,000 s.f.) of a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility located at 1800 Wheeler Avenue; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested that the City enter into a development agreement which would allow the entitlements for a second phase (approximately 81,000 s.f.) to be extended for ten years, with a potential for one five-year extension; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted policy (Resolution No. 87-31) which establishes the standards for review and approval of development agreements; and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the property boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City prepared an Addendum to the La Verne Technology Center Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration (dated July 2014) which showed that this Project would not have any new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects beyond those that were identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the development known as the La Verne Technology Center that was previously approved for this Property.

WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 21, 2016, and considered public testimony in accordance with City and State requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of La Verne as follows:

Section 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council HEREBY FINDS and DETERMINES that the proposed development agreement could not have a significant effect upon the environment and reaffirms the adopted Addendum to the La Verne Technology Center Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Section 2. Findings. In approving the proposed development agreement, the City Council HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that Case No. 79-14DA satisfies the following conditions of City Council Resolution 87-31 in that:

Page 189 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 9

1. The proposed development agreement is consistent with the General Plan in that the primary goal of the agreement is to extend the entitlement process for the second phase of the Gilead La Verne Campus, which would continue to be consistent with the General Plan's designation as "Commercial/Business Park".

2. 3.

4. 5.

The proposed development agreement serves the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare in that it will ensure that the development and its improvements will provide additional jobs while remaining consistent with the original entitlements.

The proposed development agreement is consistent with good city planning and zoning practices in that it allows the future construction of approximately 81,000 square feet for a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility in addition to the 320,000 square foot building currently under construction.

The proposed development agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City of La Verne. The agreement will allow further development on the 23-acre property that has previously been considered and reviewed through the entitlement process.

The proposed development agreement will promote and encourage the development of the proposed project by providing up to 15 years for the second phase to be constructed. The agreement permits the developer to complete the project without fear of changes in already approved standards and practices; at the same time it will provide the City with secured funds in order to complete public improvements adjacent to the project site.

Section 3. Approval. Based upon the above findings, the City Council HEREBY APPROVES the proposed development agreement (Case No. 79-14DA) for the Gilead Sciences, Inc. pharmaceutical manufacturing facility located at 1800 Wheeler Avenue which said Development Agreement is attached as Exhibit 1 to this Ordinance. Said approval includes approval of any minor, conforming and clarifying changes that are consistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney prior to execution thereof, including completion of references and completion and conformity of all exhibits thereto.

Section 4. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance as provided in Section 7 hereof, the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City of La Verne.

Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to perform all acts authorized to be performed by the City Manager in the administration of the proposed development agreement pursuant to the terms of the proposed development agreement.

Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. 2 Ordinance No. 1067

Page 190 of 326 ends

Section 8. The Mayor shall sign and the Deputy City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th of April, 2016 ..

ATTEST:
c:R".'f-l d c)..tl£'-.,, r~t'\,Ll,lcv
Lupe Gaeta Estrella, Deputy City Clerk
The foregoing Ordinance No. 1067 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City duly held on 21 st day of March, 2016, and was thereafter, at a regular meeting of said Council duly held on 4th day of April, 2016, duly passed and adopted by the said City Council and thereupon duly signed by the Mayor of said City, attested by the City Clerk of said City, and passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Rosales, Hepburn, Carder, Redman, and Mayor Kendrick.

Nol')e.

None.

None.
3 r==A,\ N ~ o.il~ {~trJJ,J ~
\i{p~vG~ta Estrella, CMC
Deputy City Clerk
Ordinance No. 1067

Page 191 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

EXHIBIT F

IMPACT FEES
[City to insert schedule of impact fees and rates currently in effect] ClTY OF LA VERNE SCHEDULE OF FEES
,, .. , ,w, ,,eve ""'''' , ,~,
AOD~SS l&IOW-,wA--,- CASENUMSER i!G-13PPR
APPLICANT GIU>a<I PHOP~E #
REQUESTED BV ES DEPAIUMl!:NT coo DATE 712lU21l14
PROPl;:R'N .ACRDGE 22.15 P!'i:OPE~ S. f. 5''44154 FRONT AGE LF. ADn,o><. 775 r«liNRESIOENTI.AI.. Bll'ILOfNG S. F. 335,487 D- on 8. ,. Chart 11J6/t4 iJ Of RESIDENTIAi.. UNITS -0 PUSU<: IMPROVEMENT QUANTITIES Str911t_ Curt> .. Gutter. """""" at Ul"I: Statlon '''"'' /."
PREPARED BY CUr:i(. DATE 11.H.1.t
NOTES WORKSHEET BASED UPON G.12. 14 l11111tY SITe Pl\"m and Utllltv .....,,._ -mffla<:I 11. ,..,_ ,, WATER FEES AMOUNTOUE AMOUNT PAID DATE RECEJPT #
JL IHTC:CINIIE-cnotf
ffiMililllfflhll
s,r,Jt;; Fa'1"Hy @ l 3BE.OC e-a t -
,. O'.'li1Yt.C.'T'€'~\Ac'-- ;ll;; z 33!:.0C ""· $ -
1· ;ll;; $ 495,00 e-a. $ -
1-1'2' @ s 6tc .. oc e-.a. s -
Z"' ® $ 82S..OC ea. .. E25.Q<J
Pt1vate Ftre ~,ice- '5"' @ $ 1,57~,.oc e-a. $ -
: Pirtvate Fire t-er,Jce· 12'" @ $ 2.75~,0C ea. $ 5.E10.0J s· @ $ 1,87f .. OC Eill.
'
L67S,OO
~TMll'tAlilAllf'a .
* d' -Gt<W',: ~ir..:e ·!:,~'"'ft ,'ffl melror 5'2:ie , • ,e 3-:7 -..or~ • 10-1--€6 ltv.; 12•3-C-- f3', F'<-re- Cer.,~i::>e 1.,.,1;;,J.x JlC~..; 11ml S-2C14 s,e·. 314·. ann 1· et l 6.>:JC e-a. ~· -
l•t•Z"'
""
! .25.00 e-a. 'I'. -
136 2" @ f ..:.:::.etc ..... l '-3.~40.00
:!<36 5• @ s 375.0C e-a. i 1:26.DOO.OJ
" i:!" ;ll;; iOKr,.:u s :0,00:::.00
ACf!lieAGe ~
fu>el0""1t:lal .,
eacn , :1 c aCNe ,!I:! s 67C.OC ea. s -
NOl"i1'8'81t16fl!IBI . .

22.1,5 eadi -,1·1c 3Cre ,!I:! s 1,2\X:,OC ea. s 265,eoo.oo Fffl)INTAQe IPft .. , '
775 , <ff". or r,'"'01t~ <f!j s 1f.;JC 1.r 'I'. '1525.0<J .-relit 1NSTM.JATWN
; ..
;i.,4- lit s 2A.SUC, Eill. s
1· ® s 3-3::'oJC ""'·
)li
·t-1..'2' @ [ 4-C.'JC e-a. ! -
i· @ :r ea::.oc la-a. t E&J.00
S~ 1JNE INSTALLATION
1->"lCP ,IT, i 2 sx.oc ~a. s -
2- "'ici'· @ ! 3,40-C'.-JC .... ,. $ ~,40J.OO
Pu.NCtteQK#iNID'WSPECTION ·WATl:!R II ""'Ui'0.00
Pla1>Ch&CI<
""
< 2 982.>JC ea. 'I'. z :e.2.0:1
l1>110Aci"""" ,!I:! $ 2.ss~.oc e-a. l Z.!;62.00
Pem-rltFN- ® s 2~,0C e-a. s 25.0J
eASH Dl:POSftli I
v!Ol'lt.M"'1!E!<:lm:1 .,, " -
~tree--1 R.eein,-atiC4"'i @ $ -
Dtt>er et a: -
sf-3623410

Page 192 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE SCHEDULE OF FEES
ADDRESS 1500 'Wb&&hw AV<&IUl8 CASE NLPMBER 5G•'13PPR
SEWER FEES .AMOUNTOUE AMOUNT PAID OATE RECEi'PTlt
# IJfflT CONNl:ClldN
- I
Glr<,e i Mi.lb Fam!!\' Jnis t:11 i 12!:.0C &a, ~ -
I
' ',
1 c.cnne:::Jof' !ff @ ! 125,00 ea, :r 125_::o
.. ~;:4 ?>-.,.t.: :,,::.s.,•10:10 :-," g:,c .r;d <eYel ell % 25 i:>C ea, $ 6,140.60 ~M.1- w-.$' Slt"XblllE ~~~ w-~·-" ~ ,I!: ! 7,50 &a, i; 67:3.!.7 f'ft'ONTACE l'B;:
775 F root,.,,.. Fff ~ l 15.00 IJ I i• 62-s.-::o
PLAN CHECK -Hlll!Pe ;uun -~ $ U)JllTaOO
1 PlanCl'l6<cil (111 $ 504-(JIC ea, [ 51:4,CO
1 Ina~ et s SJ4.•lC ea, z 5!:4,00
1 PemUI Fft @ I 2= ;JC. e;a_ 1 25 .. C-O
STREETJSDIMPROVEMEHTFEES , ... ;;::--·" ~ twm 4Gt,ffl
1 Plar Che<::t Ill I 11 12€.'X ea, ! 1\,126.00
1 m~ucr, it!! S 11,12E•lC ea, t 1 ', 126.00
1 Pem,t @ l 2t. 1X ea. !i 25.CO
STORM 0-RAIN FEES
FACILITIES. FEE
Reekhi,ntla:I I .
f;,;t~ h • ,-. t)Ut 0.;nn,1> •".,~' 11 ,!!i $ 17'5.0C ea. 5 '~e>~J,>\flt<,::-,;-~J-+SI>'! 'ti>m
Nonrnlllentlat
7".';<, ~-5 i .Q::.h '''<:l'.l=h ,Jn,•i.w it,._,,q~, @ s J.5{:.0C ea, t T7,5:5.X1 u: "H1-:...tu, tf';i!$'~,z!'" I

PARK FEES
Park. ""1h1M1 apace ams !111C1'&anon Nies
'4o?N "e<iidel"l!Ul @ i .al,SOC Oil ea, l -
·2.er u re~ider'-1!:at, .2'no units a, s 3 DJO.-:lC l!a, t - :iom,~ .riel a~S:ed care @ s 1,500,00 ea, I
Very ';;NI, IDW, 'T'o:ler.ne ct, s 1,SOC.OC· ea. 1
1~~," "lo?.li oom'I, 1r,:n,;etrtat, etc i!ll s CA•C E,_f. I '34,1li4JID Lam;Je,"'308 P1an Cl't- ® ea, s -
Landacape maoectlon @ ea, & -
Otl'ter @ ea. t -

FIRE FACILITY FEE
::la'et\'ECIDiD Im= Fee @ ! 3-:,,:,,x ea. s -
Devet®mert lmcao: Fee @ $ 7,504,00 ea, $
•-- Cfte._.., -..1N ·-nnc;.

Plsn Ch&Ck @ ea. l
11\8-.,.M @ E-'.J, ~ -
UNDERGROUND UTILITY f'EES
• FtNIUili<nttal
. '•I
\ I f':'A' ;:;:f ,;:l'\I~ Whl'> 1/1Jt_t,
--·a.tJ.non o1' 75,000.00; ,.::;.'\:~
"IC'.10 ~I:! :&3eJ.l)J i!ll s 17500 ••<em i -
N<l(jf"NldEmtlaJ .', ; .. i
l," Jt-i:

N>i!V.' or rE!'lo:!el wtm a 'SJ~"<J:i.fl,

22. ~5 vali.ia'!bn or -375,00C @ 1 35{).•JC ,t,zjg,: 1 11,s2-sJ::o

RBMBURSEMENTS
W,J:IE<" :)Is~ @ ea. ~ -
<.,tOl'I') Or,31, Oil.:rct tlJ ea, :i: -
T"a'!l!c ::lk;Nl D-st1ci @ ea.. 1 -
-kl~Mc.'-..... ·- i!ll ea. [ -
Jr,l-d UtHt; i!ll &a. s -
MISCEU..AMEOUS FEES
1 W6l!! Pi,V"!"lp· in-"'....ta >Frst•ln• it!! 81:JOOJ @_ $ S!l,D00.00 el! ea. [ -
sf-3623410

Page 193 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 RESOLUTION NO. 14-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FEE RESOLUTION ENCOMPASSING CERTAIN FEES AND

POLICIES FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF LA VERNE EXCEPT FOR CERTAIN WATER AND SEWER FEES ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 13-65 AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO.13-22.

WHEREAS, the Municipal Code of the City of La Verne provides that certain filing fees, permit fees, inspection fees, deposits, and conditions of service may from time to time be established by the City Council; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Verne has determined that the cost of providing certain services is not of general benefit but of benefit to the individual and, therefore, certain filing fees, permit fees, inspection fees and deposits should be required to pay for materials and special services performed by the City staff;
WHEREAS, after the passage of Propositions 4 and 218, local governments were made to charge the costs of services to those who benefited;
WHEREAS, for certain services performed, the cost of providing said services greatly varies and is contingent upon the specifics of each project or application. The City Council finds it more appropriate to require an initial deposit to guarantee the applicant will reimburse the City for costs associated. If the costs exceed the deposit, the applicant shall be responsible for additional deposits or reimbursement necessary to offset cost. If cost of service performed is less than deposit, then the difference shall be refunded to applicant; WHEREAS, based upon fee justification reports on file with the City Clerk and the City Finance Officer, the City Council finds that the fees included in this Resolution represent the actual costs of the services provided or facilities funded and, therefore, there is a rational relationship between the fees charged and the services and facilities funded;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that since the fees represent the actual costs of the services or facilities provided, there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee charged and the costs of the services or facilities provided to the person paying the fee; WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adjust fees for certain services from time to time and to incorporate all adjusted and/or new fees for services provided into one comprehensive resolution; WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to adjust fees for services, and to maintain a comprehensive document which incorporates most or all fees for services provided by the City into one Resolution, however the City Manager shall have the authority to establish staff billing rates and equipment charges by Administrative Regulation (AR) on an as needed basis; and WHEREAS, after notifying those parties interested in fee revisions and publishing notice of a public hearing, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed adoption of this Resolution on May 5, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Verne as follows:

SECTION 1. That the general regulations and project deposit guidelines are established as follows:

TIME & MATERIALS DEPOSITS - Certain types of applications have been determined by the City Council to benefit the applicant. Therefore, these deposit projects will be billed on a time and material basis including applicable administrative overhead.

Project costs include City Attorney, City Staff, City Engineer, City Landscape Consultant and other fees including overhead costs for staff and contract personnel. All deposit fees shall be due and payable immediately upon presentation of a billing statement by the City. All deposited fees not used to process and manage the application shall be returned after receipt and payment of final project-related bills.

Staff billing rates and equipment charges are established periodically by Administrative Regulation (AR) of the City Manager.

BILLING - Failure to pay all charges invoiced within thirty (30) days of the date of invoice shall be considered a sufficient cause to stop processing until full payment is made. The City will accept only cash, cashier's checks, or bank checks for payment. Work on a deposit project will not commence until payments have cleared the bank and funds have been transferred to the City. Projects shall not be deemed approved until all City fees have been paid in full.

LATE PAYMENT CHARGE - Outstanding balances that are not paid in full within twenty-five (25) days after the statement is rendered shall accrue a late payment fee of one percent (1%) per month.

Page 194 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
D.

REVISIONS - Fees set forth for plan check and development review shall be for the initial application and one (1) revision. Additional revisions submitted by the applicant shall be accompanied by an additional filing fee equal to one-half of the initial fee. Changes after approval, if by a new applicant, shall be subject to the entire applicable fee.

RECORDS - Records of deposit projects are available by contacting the City. Project deposit updates or closing out of projects shall be accompanied by project summary sheets, detailing costs of staff time, City Attorney, City Engineer, City Landscape Consultant, and other consultation charges.

HARDSHIPS - Fees shall be paid in full for all development projects. The City recognizes that in unique and special circumstances financial hardship may preclude the full payment of fee prior to application for permits. In such cases, the applicant shall apply for a payment deferral agreement with the City Manager.

In no case shall the fees be waived or partially paid when the project is completed. The applicant shall state in writing the reasons for deferral. The City Manager shall inform the Community Development Director and Finance officer in writing of the fee deferral and reasons for the deferral. In no case shall the City Manager permit less than half of the fee to be initially paid.

FEE REDUCTION FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - The City Manager, at his sole discretion, may offer a reduction in any impact or processing fee. Such reduction shall not exceed 30 percent, and shall apply only to specified economic development projects which meet one or more of the following objectives:

1. Any project generating more than 100 new, permanent jobs; in a category deemed desirable after review by the City Manager.

2. Any project which adds more than $100,000 in projected annual sales tax revenues to the City's general fund.

3. Any project which converts an historic or potentially significant structure for adaptive reuse as a revenue-generating commercial enterprise or affordable housing project meeting specific general plan targets for affordable housing production and cultural resource preservation.

4. Any project which meets 50% or more of any Items 1-2 of the above criteria (e.g., 50 new permanent jobs, $50,000 in projected new annual sales tax revenues, $50,000 in additional tax increment revenue) may be considered, on a case-by-case basis, for some level of impact or processing fee reduction, up to a maximum of 30 percent reduction.

PAYMENT OF BUSINESS LICENSE FEES AND OLD TOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FEES FOR REMOTE POINT OF SALE BUSINESSES - The City Manager, at his/her sole discretion, may credit sales tax received by the City from a remote point of sale business in payment of that business's Business License Fee imposed by Chapter 5.12 of the La Verne Municipal Code, and, if the business is located in the Old Town Business Improvement District, may make payment from that businesses sales tax proceeds of the DBID fee imposed by Ordinance No. 720. A "remote point of sale business" is a business that satisfies all of the following: (a) identifies the City as its point of sales for its retail sales, (b) does not maintain its sales inventory in the City; (c) generates taxable sales of no less than $40,000 per square feet of its sales office in the City; and (d) has generated a minimum of $50,000 of sales tax revenues to the City in the previous calendar year.

In adopting these fees and charges, the City believes that the fees and charges set forth herein fully comply with all applicable laws. Any person who disputes the validity of any fee or its application to his or her own case shall first file a written appeal with the office of the City Manager, who will review the matter and render a decision. The decision of the City manager is subject to appeal to the City Council, whose decision is final.

OTHER FEES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE - Applicants should be aware that they may be subject to other fees and charges for service established periodically by Administrative Regulation (AR) of the City Manager or by Ordinance as contained in the La Verne Municipal Code.

EXEMPTION OF FEES - Where it is verified by the City Manager or appropriate department head that the City is the applicant or party to be charged, fees will be waived. Additionally where a contractor has been hired on behalf of the City, fees may be waived at the discretion of the City Manager.

SECTION 2. That certain fees and charges for service for the City of La Verne are established as follows:

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 2

Page 195 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
A.

DIVISION OF LAND FILING FEES - Items in this category identified with an "initial deposit" are charged on a time and materials basis. See Page 1 of this Resolution for further explanation.

1. Subdivisions:

Tentative Maps
Final Maps

2. Parcel Maps:

Tentative Maps
Final Maps

3. Lot Line Adjustments,
Lot Mergers, and
Reversions to Acreage

4. Lot Tie & Covenant Agreement.

5. Records of Survey

6. Map Extensions

7. Assessment Apportionment
for Assessment Districts under the
"Improvement Act of 1915"

8. Conditions, Covenants &
Restrictions (C.C.& R's) Review

9. Certificate of Compliance

10. Housing Development
Impact Linkage Fee for
Affordable Housing
Initial deposit of $2,000.

Initial deposit of $2,000, plus $35 per lot, excluding
lots to be deeded to the City. If the Final Map is not
submitted in digital format, a data conversion fee of
$150 plus $10 for each additional lot over 5 is
required.

Initial deposit of $1,000
Initial deposit of $800, plus $35 per lot, excluding
lots to be deeded to the City. If the final map is not
submitted in Digital format. a data conversion fee of
$150 is required.
$500 initial deposit plus $35
per lot prior to merger or reversion.
$250 fee
Initial deposit of $500
Initial deposit of $250
Initial deposit of $1,000
Initial deposit of $1,500
$250 fee
$1,500 per new residential unit in projects
of three or more units for which purchase
or rental value exceeds estimated affordability at
the current County median income level as
determined by the Community Development
Department. This fee shall apply to all residential
projects authorized by a tentative map, final map,
or nonsubdivision precise plan approval for the
construction of new units granted after July 1,
1993.

LAND USE FILING FEES - Items in this category identified with an "initial deposit" are charged on a time and material basis. See Page 1 of this Resolution for further explanation. NOTE: For any deposit project for which the Planning Commission or City Council imposes annual or periodic inspections as a condition of permit approval, the Community Development Department may withhold up to $1,000 of deposit funds on file to cover costs associated with annual inspections.

The Community Development Director may combine deposits when there are two or more applications required for one project.

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. General Plan Amendment
Zone Change
Specific Plan
Specific Plan Amendment
Variance
Initial deposit of $2,000
Initial deposit of $2,000
Initial deposit of $2,000
Initial deposit of $750
Initial deposit of $2,000 for multi-family residential
uses in excess of two dwelling units per lot; initial
Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 3

Page 196 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
deposit of $750 for second residential dwelling unit
per lot and/or duplexes
$2,000 deposit - all nonresidential uses
1 $1,000 deposit for single family residential dwelling uses
2 6. Minor Exceptions $300 fee nonresidential
3 $100 fee residential

7. Conditional Use Permits
4 Residential Initial deposit of $2,000 for multi-family 5 residential uses in excess of two dwelling
units per lot
6 Initial deposit of $750 for second residential
dwelling unit per lot and/or duplexes
7 $1,000 deposit for large family day care
8 homes (9 - 14 children)
9 $500 deposit per lot for all other conditional uses
in single family residential dwelling zones
10 Commercial, Industrial, $2,000 deposit
Institutional $1,000 deposit for CUP amendment
11 8. Master Plan Review $2,000 deposit for new
12 $1,000 deposit for amendment
13 9. Home Occupation Permit $50 fee

10. Development Agreement Initial deposit of $1,500
14 11. Classification of Use $300 fee
15 12. Zoning Certifications $125 fee for letter

13. Feasibility Reports $250 fee
16 14. Special Event Permit $150 fee plus $250 refundable cleanup deposit, 17 subject to adjustment by the Community
Development Department. $25 fee for local
(La Verne based) nonprofit organizations and no
18 clean up deposit. $50 fee for other non profit
organizations. Public Works fees and/or an
19 Entertainment permit fee may also be applicable.

Additional deposits may be required for public
20 safety review and inspections. Applications that are submitted within 7-45 days of the event will be
charged a fee of $200 for expedited review. This
21 expedited review fee is not subject to waiver or
refund. Applications submitted less than 7 days
22 prior to event will not be considered.
23 15. Permit for Christmas tree lots, $250 fee plus $250 refundable clean-up fee 24 pumpkin patches, and/or when not located in a retail center under related seasonal sales common management.
25 26
27 Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 4
28

Page 197 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 C.

16. Use and Occupancy Permit

17. State mandated
Planning Fee
State mandated "green" building
fee per S.S. 1473

18. General Plan fee

19. Performance & Completion Deposit

20. Interim Use Permit
$200 fee for occupancies greater than or equal to
2,000 square feet gross floor area; $100 fee for all
others
A five percent (5%) fee is
applied to the Building Permit
Fee for all new construction including additions and
remodels. This fee is collected upon the issuance of
the Building Permit. This fee does not apply to
Mechanical, Plumbing, Grading, Electrical, Sewer
or Occupancy
Permit Valuation Fee
$1 -25,000 $1
$25,001 - 50,000 $2
$50,001 - 75,000 $3
$75,001 -100,000 $4
Every $25,000 or fraction Add $1
thereof above $100,000
A four percent (4%) fee is applied to the building
permit fee for all construction to maintain and
update the La Verne General Plan.
$5,000 minimum, plus additional as required to
ensure project completion and cleanup. This
deposit is only collected as necessary, and with
concurrence of applicant, to permit City
consideration of temporary utility release and/or
temporary occupancy for projects which have
uncompleted improvements or requirements not
related to health and safety.

Initial deposit of $2,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEES - Items in this category identified with an "initial deposit" are charged on a time and materials basis. See Page One of this Resolution for further explanation.

1. Categorical exemption

2. Initial study review

3. Full Environmental
Impact Report
$25 flat fee
Initial deposit of $2,500 (includes County filing and
posting fees)
Initial deposit of $5,000 (includes County
filing and posting fees)
PRECISE PLAN FILING FEES for Precise Plan processing not described in the categories shown, the Community Development Director may assign a flat fee of $100 or an initial deposit as determined necessary to recover costs. Precise Plans requiring an "initial deposit" are charged on a time and materials basis. See Page One of this Resolution for further explanation.

Community Development Director Applications

1. Two-story room additions, other additions, and accessory structures requiring precise plan review, and one-story second dwelling units - $0.50 per square foot of new gross floor area (including garages, porches, and utility structures). In no event shall the minimum fee be less than $75.

2. Multi-family patios, room additions and accessory structures - $75 fee.

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 5

Page 198 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 3. Single family home - not in conjunction with subdivision development - 50 cents per square foot of gross floor area.

4. Commercial and industrial minor interior and exterior remodels and alterations where no DRC review required - $350 fee.

5. Institutional minor interior and exterior remodels where no DRC review required - $250 fee.

6. Landscape Renovation and Landscape Concept Plan Review * Single Family Residential - $50 Fee
* Multi Family Residential - $250 Fee
* Non Residential - $500 deposit

7. Solar collectors - Residential -
Non-residential -

8. Oversized antenna review - $50 fee
$ 75 fee
$150 fee

9. Miscellaneous review fee - $50 fee, or see "D," above

10. Tree removal permit - $300 deposit (includes actual cost for professional services, e.g. landscape architect, arborist)

11. Exterior alterations, with no increase in square footage, visible from street or public place - $50 fee

12. Historic Preservation Review - Initial deposit of $500 on projects that require the use of an Historic Preservation Architect to assist with the review.

Development Review Committee Applications

1. Single family homes - In conjunction with subdivision development - Initial deposit of 50 cents per square foot of gross area per model plus $25 per each unit.

2. Multiple family development - Initial deposit of $2,000.

3. Commercial, office and industrial - Initial deposit of $2,000.

4. Institutional - Initial deposit of $2,000.

5. Official - Initial deposit of $2,000, except official projects determined to be of benefit to the public may be exempt from processing fees, as verified by the City Manager and the Community Development Director.

6. Commercial, industrial, and institutional minor interior and exterior remodels - Initial deposit of $500
Sign Precise Plans

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

Master sign programs:
* Initial Master Sign Application - $750 deposit
* Amendments - $250 deposit
Ground sign not part of a Master Sign Program - t$250 fee. All building permits for ground sign construction and installation shall be accompanied by a cash deposit of $750 to ensure completion of the sign. Following release of the sign by the City, the deposit shall be refunded to the applicant.

Non-illuminated wall sign not part of a Master Sign Program - $50 fee per sign. \
Illuminated wall ~ign not part of a Master Sign Program - $75 fee per sign plus electrical permit. \
Subdivision sign - Initial deposit of $500 per sign.

Illuminated window signs - $20 fee per sign (plus electrical permit) Temporary Sign Permits (banners only as authorized by La Verne Municipal Code Title 17), not to exceed four times per year and a maximum of 28 days - no fee.

All signs requiring DRC approval - $350 deposit
Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Fees

1. Residential Plan Check - Initial deposit of $250.

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 6

Page 199 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
E.

2. Commercial/Industrial/Office - Initial deposit of $300.

3. Residential tract and planned developments - Initial deposit of $500.

4. Landscape Inspection Fees - Initial deposit based on the following formula: Five percent (5%) of that portion of the costs of improvements which are $50,000 or less. One and one-half percent (1-1/2%) of that portion of the costs of improvements which exceed $50,000.

No Charge Applications

1. 1-story room additions, patios and other alterations not visible from street or public place such as a park, school or trail.

2. Zoning information.

3. Preliminary consultations not exceeding three hours.

4. Signs conforming to a master sign plan and which do not require precise plan review.

5. Banner Sign Permit.

6. Heritage tree pruning permit.

7. Minor alterations to an existing ground sign or monument sign, such as a panel change out.

OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

1. Engineering & Planning - Consultation prior to filing formal application: $500 deposit after three hours of consultation

2. Planning Department Publications - Public handouts and summaries are available at no charge. Other publications not listed below are charged at the estimated cost of reproduction. a. Environmental Guidelines $2.50 each
b. General Plan Background Report $30
C. Complete General Plan $50
Individual General Plan Items:
1) color map and summary $5 each
2) individual elements $10 each
3) text including map $50 each
4) environmental impact report $25 each
d. Master Sign Programs $5 each
(over 10 pages)
e. Ordinances $2.50 each if not available as free handout f. Specific Plans
1) Foothill Blvd. $25 each
2) Arrow Corridor $20 each
3) Lordsburg $15 each
4) Out of print plans Actual cost of duplication
g. Zoning Map $5 each
h. Zoning Ordinance $15 each
i. General Plan Map $5 each
j. Environmental Impact Reports Actual cost of duplication k. Aerial photocopies, $20 matte paper
approximately 2' x 3' $25 glossy paper
Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 7

Page 200 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
l
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 F.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

I. Other Documents 15¢ per copy
Records Management Charge: Charge for microfilming and/or digital recording of all applicable records in connection with planning and building division approvals. Fee to be charged as follows:
a. Deposit projects (flat fee $150
charged at time of filing)
b. Non-deposit projects, except $150
single-family construction
and second units on single family lots.
c. New single-family units on $55
single-family lots; remodels, additions,
accessory structures and 1
second units on single family lots.
d. Applications with base fees
of $100 or less
Mailing Labels & Radius Map
Digital Conversion of Plans
Fence Review Fee
Notary Fee
Mills Act Historic Preservation
Agreement
No charge
(Applicant Option) $175, up to 100 labels and
50 cents each additional label
(Applicant option) All development application plans
(site plan, floor plan, elevations, etc.) must be
accompanied by a digital (pdf) copy or the applicant
can pay $2 per sheet for the City to convert plans to
pdf.
$25, plus building permit and public works fee if
applicable. This fee applies only to individual fence
proposals which are not part of a larger project or
other in-process application.

As set by State law
$500 fee
PARKING MITIGATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE -Applies to properties pursuant to Section

18. 76.150 of the La Verne Municipal Code where sufficient off-street parking is not available. Payment of a one-time in-lieu fee shall be permitted in the amount of $1,000 per parking space, as determined by the Community Development Department, for required spaces that cannot be supplied on-site (subject to availability and City Manager approval).

OLD TOWN LA VERNE MERCHANT PARKING PERMIT - A $50 permit fee is required for each Merchant Parking Permit issued for each calendar year. Permits are distributed at the discretion of the City Manager on a yearly basis with a maximum number of permits available each year as outlined in Administrative Regulation No. 117.

H. ANNEXATION PROCESSING - Initial deposit of $2,500
I.

APPEALS - To appeal to the City Council decisions of the Community Development Director, Planning Commission, Development Review Committee, and other administrative staff actions, a fee of $150 shall be required plus mail and public notice costs as estimated by the City Clerk for resident appeals.

Appeals by nonresident applicants and other nonresident parties shall be in the amount of one half of the original filing fee.

IMPROVEMENTS, PLAN CHECKING, AND INSPECTION FEES - To be paid at the time plans are submitted.

1. Improvement Plan checking based on the estimated cost of improvements. Minimum fee shall be $110.
a. Five percent (5%) of that portion of the cost of improvements which is $50,000 or less.

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 8
l

Page 201 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
K.

L.
b. One and one-half percent (1-1/2%) of that portion of the cost of improvements which exceeds $50,000.

2. Inspections, based on the estimated cost of required improvements. Minimum fee shall be $11 O; a. Five percent (5%) of that portion of the cost of improvements which is $50,000 or less. b. One and one-half percent (1-1/2%) of that portion of the cost of improvements which exceeds $50,000.

BUILDING PERMITS - Building permit and plan check base fees shall be established at two times the prevailing Los Angeles County fees as amended from time to time by ordinance of the City Council.

The prevailing Los Angeles County fee shall be established Per Title 26, Section 107 of the County of Los Angeles Building Code.

PUBLIC WORKS

1. Staff billing rates and equipment charges are established periodically by Administrative Regulation (AR) of the City Manager.

2. Public Works Permits:

3. 4.
a. Permit fee
b. Over-limit and house
moving permit fee
c. Standard inspection fees:
1) New residential, and new
and existing industrial,
commercial, professional
and institutional construction.
2) Double permits and inspection fees
shall be charged for failure to obtain
required permits prior to commencing
work within the public right of way.
d. Deposits (refundable):
$25
$16
$110 plus $20 for each
inspection in excess of two
1) An amount equal to the estimated value of work to be performed. 2) Yearly Deposit $3,000/year -Any damages to be recovered from deposit.

Barricades/Deposits K-~ail Rental Rates:
a. Type 1 (Standard/Single Panel) at
b. Type 2 (Standard 2 Panel/A-Frame) at
C. Fee to make ready barricades if
picked up by user.
d. Fee if delivered to user
(no ready fee applies)
e. Replacement Cost
(if not returned)
Damage to City Property or Vehicles
$40 /deposit $2/day each
$50 /deposit $3/day each
$10 minimum charge -1 st 10 units
$1 per unit over 10
$30
Actual cost plus 15%
Actual repair/replacement charges + 20% to cover
loss of use, temporary replacement of vehicle or
other city property and administrative costs

5. Signs - The following fees include materials and labor to install any traffic control sign as required.

All regulatory, warning and advisory signs shall be installed by the City. a. Street name signs $300 per installation
Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 9

Page 202 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 M.

0. b. Traffic control signs $250 per installation
c. Directional signs $250 per installation

6. Public Works Department Publications - Te following documents are available at the stated fees. All other publications not listed below, or portions of the listed documents, are charged at the cost of reproduction.
a. Standard contract documents
b. Notice inviting bids
c. Blue prints
d. Standard Plans
e. Plotter prints

7. NPDES Inspection Fee

8. Form Completion
$50 for entire publication (does not include
copyrighted documents)
$25 minimum or actual cost bid packages
$3 per page or actual cost from outside printer
$0.15 (15¢)/page
$15 per page
A fee shall be assessed to all businesses as defined
by the L.A. Regional Water Quality Control Board for
annual inspections in compliance with the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit requirements. The fee shall be assessed at
the time of the annual business license renewal. The
fee shall equal the actual cost of inspection not to
exceed $300.

All forms requested to be completed by the city
shall be subject to a fee of $25 per form. Forms
shall be completed in two (2) business days from
the day submitted.

STORM DRAIN FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

1. 2.

Residential: Upon application for a
building permit for construction of a
new building (or an addition and/or
remodel with a valuation of $75,000) to
be used for residential purposes
Nonresidential: Upon application for
a building permit for construction of a
new building (or addition and/or remodel
with a valuation of $75,000) to be used
for nonresidential purposes

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FEE

1. 2.

Residential: Upon application for a
building permit for construction of a
new building (or an addition and/or
remodel with a valuation of $75,000)
to be used for residential purposes.

Nonresidential: Upon application for
a building permit for construction of a
new building (or an addition and/or
remodel with a valuation of $75,000) to
be used for nonresidential purposes.
$175 for each one-tenth (10) gross acre or fraction
thereof; provided that maximum fee for single
family residence shall not exceed $350
$350 for each one-tenth (1/10) gross acre or
fraction thereof
$175 for each one-tenth (1/10) gross acre or
fraction thereof; provided that maximum fee
for single family residence shall not exceed
$350
$350 for each one-tenth (1/10) gross acre
or fraction thereof

RATES, FEES, CHARGES AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE FOR THE FURNISHING OF WATER BY

THE CITY OF LA VERNE
Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 10

Page 203 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
l
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 1. Connection and Frontage Charges: The fees or charges adopted herein are imposed only as a condition of extending or initiating service upon the request of a customer. The fee or charge is not imposed upon real property or upon persons as an incident of property ownership.

2. Water System Connection Fee: Any person applying for water service to one or more parcels of land which have not previously received water service directly through a service connection from the City of La Verne specifically for such parcel shall, before such application is approved, pay to the City water system connection fees as follows. In the event that a customer requests to upgrade to a larger service after payment of impact fees and/or service connection, the customer shall be responsible for the difference in impact fees included in section 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, and 2e:
a. Unit Connection Fee - Residential: The following fee shall be charged for each residential unit (as defined in Section 9) connected to the system:

Single family dwelling unit
Townhouse or condominium, each unit
Apartment, duplexes and triplexes, each unit
Mobile homes, per space
Motels, per unit
Rooming houses and convalescent homes, per unit
$385
330
330
275
135
110
b. Unit Connection Fee - Nonresidential, Commercial Institutional or Industrial: The following fee shall be charged for each meter connected to the system which serves nonresidential, commercial, institutional or industrial user:
3/4-inch
1-inch
1 1/2-inch
2-inch
3-inch
4-inch
6-inch
8-inch
10-inch
12-inch
$ 385
495
610
825
1,050
1,270
1,545
1,875
2,205
2,755
c. Acreage Connection Fee - Residential: For each one-tenth (1/10) usable gross acre or fraction thereof, the fee shall be as follows:

All Zones $670
d. Acreage Connection Fee - Nonresidential, Commercial Institutional or Industrial:

For each one-tenth (1/10) usable gross acre or fraction thereof, the fee shall be as follows:

All Zones $1,200
e. Post Miramar Connection Fee:
1)
Resolution No. 14- 22
Metered Service: For each water meter connected to the City water system, the fee shall be equal to the amount shown in the table below for the size of meter, multiplied by the number of months which have passed since October 1, 1986. Post Miramar connection fee shall be paid at the time of installation of the meter.

Size of Meter
5/8 & 3/4-inch
1-inch
1 1/2-inch
2-inch
3-inch
4-inch
6-inch
Monthly Charge
$ 8.00

8.00 25.00

40.00 62.50
125.00
300.00

Page 11 ends

Page 204 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
P.
2)
8-inch
10-inch
12-inch
375.00
500.00
625.00
Private Fire Service: For each private fire service connected to the City water system, the fee shall be equal to the amount shown in the table below for the size of connection, multiplied by the number of months which have passed since October 1, 1986. Post Miramar connection fee shall be paid at the time of installation of the service and shall not exceed a maximum of $10,000.

Size of Connection
2-inch
3-inch
4-inch
6-inch
8-inch
10-inch
12-inch
Monthly Charge
$ 12.00

18.75 37.50

90.00 112.50
150.00
187.50
f. Usable Acreage: Usable acreage is all land other than that which is unsuitable for development because of the nature of the terrain and is subject to legal restriction limiting its use to unirrigated natural open space in perpetuity. Such restriction shall be reviewed and approved by the City of La Verne and shall be determined on a parcel by parcel basis. The restriction shall be by dedication of fee or easement to the Homeowners Association, the City, or other government agency. Acreage fees are due and shall be paid upon recordation of final map. Provided, however, that parcels for which no acreage fees were previously paid, fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits.

Usable acreage shall not include land which is developed by the developer as a public park, and dedicated to the City of La Verne.
g. Frontage Fee: For each parcel of land fronting on a street that contains an existing water line with adequate capacity for the subject parcel a fee of $15 per front foot shall be charged.

For each parcel connecting to a water main in Foothill Boulevard or any other street where the two sides of the street are served from separate pressure zones, the charge shall be two times the amount shown.
1)
2)
Fees shall be calculated as of the date of payment. However, if payment is made more than sixty (60) days before anticipated connection, as determined by the City Manager, fees shall be recalculated as of sixty (60) days before such anticipated connection and any increase shall be due and payable before connection.

The City is empowered to negotiate contracts with individuals, firms or corporations relative to the extension or enlargement of water facilities and/or relative to methods of reimbursement to the City. Credits may be given against the fees set forth herein where property owners have constructed water facilities or where property has been assessed for like improvements.
h. Abandonment of Services. When an existing service has been shut off continuously or otherwise terminated for a period of two (2) years or more, it shall be presumed to be abandoned. Any subsequent service shall be treated as a new service and subject to all applicable fees including acreage and frontage fees of this resolution.

REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICE CHARGES

1. Daily, Monthly or Bimonthly Service Fees. The fees or charges adopted herein at subsections 2- a., 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 3 & 4 are imposed as a condition of service by the City's franchised waste hauler.

This fee or charge is not imposed upon real property or upon a person as an incident of property ownership.

2. Refuse Collection Charges - pending approval on June 16, 2014, new rates effective for all municipal service bills prepared on or after July 1, 2014. a. For each single family dwelling unit whether one or more are on a single lot:

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 12

Page 205 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
35 gallon container $18.96 per month
64 gallon container $20.92 per month
96 gallon container $23.00 per month
b. For each unit in a mobile home park, duplex, or other multiple dwelling unit:
35 gallon container $18.96 per month
64 gallon container $20.92 per month
96 gallon container $23.00 per month
c. For commercial and industrial establishments, churches, schools, and other sources having refuse not in excess of one (1) cubic yards per week:
35 gallon container $18.96 per month
64 gallon container $20.92 per month
96 gallon container $23.00 per month
d. For commercial and industrial establishments, churches, schools, and other sources having in excess of one (1) cubic yards per week, or requiring more frequent collection than stipulated in the schedules adopted by the City Council, the fees to be charged shall be negotiated between the establishments served and the City Manager or his designee. e. For every four (4) guest rooms or a fractional number thereof, in any hotel, motel, rooming or lodging house:
35 gallon container $18.96 per month
64 gallon container $20.92 per month
96 gallon container $23.00 per month

3. Recycling: In compliance with state mandates, recycling programs have been implemented to divert recyclable materials from the waste stream. Included within the overall refuse collection charges specified above are the costs for the implementation of such recycling efforts.

4. Other Refuse and Recycling Fees:
a. Additional mechanized solid waste container
b. Additional 96-gallon recycle container
(in excess of 2)
c. Additional 96-gallon green waste container
(in excess of 2)
d. Mechanized container size exchange
e. Bulky goods collection
f. Residential extra pick up
$8 .41 /month
$5.56/month
$5.56/month
g. Replacement of damaged or lost mechanized container (first one free) $15.77
4 @ no-charge;
collections thereafter
$26.28/cubic yd
$21.02/trip
$52.56
h. Roll Off Rates
Roll off price (includes 5 tons)
Disposal per ton (over 5 tons)
Trip charge (reschedule)
Relocation charge
i. lnsta Bin Rates
lnsta bin
Extra pick up
Temporary Bin rental per week (for each additional week) j. Recycle Roll-Off
k. Commercial Recycling Contamination Fee (per occurrence) I. Green Waste Haul Rate
Green Waste Rate per ton
m. C&D Haul Rate
C&D Rate per ton
n. Compactors
Resolution No. 14- 22
$546.57
$53.53
$135.46
$54.19
$135.46
$135.46
$27.09
$278.91
$35.00
$278.91
$44.61
$278.91
$52.83
Roll Off Haul Rate + $172.32\

Page 13 ends

Page 206 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 a.

R.
o. Compactor Cleaning Fee
p. Locking Bins (per bin per month)
Lock Replacement
Key Replacement
q. Resume Fee
$108.36
$10.87
$27.50
$5.00
$35.00

5. Definitions:
a. "Commercial unit" means all business establishments, other than industrial establishments, including nonprofit organizations, churches and schools which are not residential units. Each occupancy in a multiple unit commercial development shall be considered a separate commercial unit.
b. "Industrial unit" means each business establishment in the City which is not a commercial establishment. Each occupancy in a multiple unit industrial development shall be considered a separate industrial unit.
c. "Person" means and includes every person, corporation, partnership or association occupying a commercial, industrial or residential unit in the City. d. "Residential unit" means a dwelling unit, as defined in Chapter 18.08 of the La Verne Municipal Code, including each single family dwelling, each dwelling unit in a mobile home park, duplex, or other multiple dwelling unit. Additionally, every four guest rooms or fractional number thereof in any hotel, motel, rooming house or lodging house shall constitute a "dwelling unit." e. "Unit" means each commercial, industrial or residential unit. f. Combined institutional/residential uses having special service requirements, and refuse in excess of six (6) cubic yards per week, the units served and fees charged shall be negotiated between the establishment served and the City Manager or his designee.

SEWER SERVICE CHARGES -All sewer services furnished by the City shall be subject to the following charges:
1 . Sewer Unit Connection Fees for New Construction and/or Additions:
a. Manufacturing, Commercial, Institutional, Official and other nonresidential uses:
1)
2)
$125 plus $25 per 1,000 square feet or any fraction thereof for ground level building space, plus $7.50 per 1,000 square feet or fraction thereof for building space above ground level.

Front footage fee: $15 per front foot
b. Residential Uses:
1)
2)
Single family: For each detached single family residential unit on a single, separate lot -$125.

Multiple family, including mobile home parks, for building or buildings under one ownership: $125 for the first unit; plus $75 for each of the next nine (9) units; plus $30 for each additional unit on one lot or building site.
3) Front footage fee: $15 per front foot

POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES

1. 2.

3. Staff billing rates and equipment charges are established periodically by Administrative Regulation (AR) of the City Manager.

Overnight parking permit -- annual/daily
Overnight annual parking permit renewal fee
(Reapplication required after January 31)
$100 I $3
$50 admin fee
prorated monthly
rate of $4.16
$50
Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 14

Page 207 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 nn

4. Recreational vehicle storage permit $100
- Annual renewal fee $50 for 3 yrs.

5. Non-injury accident report $25
Injury accident report No Charge

6. All other police reports No charge

7. Concealed weapon permit Maximum per
State Law

8. Concealed weapon permit renewal Maximum per
State Law

9. Residential burglar alarm permit $50

10. Commercial burglar alarm permit $100

11. False alarm response fees: .
a. First 2 responses in any 365 day period No charge
b. Third through all subsequent responses in $50 for each 365 day period response
c. Failure to obtain an alarm permit within thirty (30) days of operation without reasonable cause will result in a $10 per day fee every day thereafter.

12. Copies of color photographs or CD ROM: $15

13. Audio/video tape reproduction of taping

14. Pre-employment Local Criminal History Check

15. Location/Address Call History Report

16. Massage Permit for Operator

17. Firearms sales permit

18. Bingo Game Permit Fees:
a. Bingo Permit Fee & Annual Renewal
b. Bingo Manager Permit Fee as required by
La Verne Municipal Code

19. Service charge for release of impounded vehicles.
a. General impound fees (Driver NOT found to be
under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.) NO DUI
b. For vehicles where the driver is arrested for
driving under the influence or reckless driving.

Up to $250 fee may be waived if there is no criminal filing

20. Service charge for release of abated vehicles

21. Storage of seized vehicle

22. Citation sign-off for persons who
fail to display handicapped placards.

23. Citation sign-off fee (nonresidents)

24. Second response fee - loud party or noise
disturbance per L.V.M.C. Section 8.20.050

25. Adult booking recovery fee

26. Juvenile detention fee
($18.75 per¼ hour). Billable beginning one (1) hour after parent notification.

27. Jail Trustee acceptance letter
Resolution No. 14- 22
$40/half hour
$30
$20
$250
$250
Actual cost
Actual cost
$150
$400
$125
$10/day per vehicle
$10
$10
Actual cost
$125
$75 per hour
$30

Page 15 ends

Page 208 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 1"11"1
s.

28. Inmate worker fees
- full-time inmate worker
- part-time furlough workers

29. Live-Scan applicant fingerprinting

30. Rolled ink fingerprinting

31. Requests for Traffic/Parking Enforcement
on Private streets. Requesting Party shall
provide to the City labels or preaddressed
envelopes to affected residents.

32. Police clearance letter

33. Firearm Storage Fee

34. Firearm Release Fee
Shall apply to all firearms seized, stored or impounded.

Any & all fees shall be waived if firearm is stolen
or if surrendered for destruction. All fees due upon release.

35. Electric Utility/Security Cart Inspection Fee (per Reso. No. 09-05)

FIRE DEPARTMENT FEES
$25 per day plus
$250 fee@ booking
$60 per day plus
$250 fee @ booking
$20 per process plus
actual cost charged
by DOJ and/or FBI
$10 for 1 card
$5 each add'I card
$175 per request;
City preparation
of address labels,
if desired, per the
fees set forth @
#E-4 of this Reso.
$15
$10 per month
$50 per case/incident
$10 per cart

1. Staff billing rates and equipment charges are established periodically by Administrative Regulation (AR) of the City Manager.

All businesses with conditions, processes or materials that require an annual fire permit as per the Uniform Fire Code shall pay the following fee(s):

First permitted use
Each subsequent permitted use
Failure to pay permit fee within 30 days of
receiving renewal letter or permit application

2. Special Activities Fees
Hazardous event/operations -- Upon agreement
by both the Fire Chief and City Manager,
special activities fees can be waived.

This fee does not apply to the City's annual
4th of July fireworks show.

Special site inspection
Tank installation and/or removal, underground,
flammable liquids
$80
$50
50% additional
$150 minimum
deposit
$150 deposit
$100 plus
$50 each
additional tank

3. Minimum Plan Check Fees - The fees for these services are dependent upon the rates established by Administrative Regulation (AR) of the City and shall be collected based on the following deposits.

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 16

Page 209 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
New construction, additions,
alterations, and improvements
Special equipment/systems
Fire alarms/extinguishing systems
Flammable/hazardous liquids storage tanks
Gases and liquefied gas systems
Revision check
Special request expedition

4. Other Activities
Field inspection by Fire Prevention
Bureau
$200 minimum
deposit
$150 minimum
deposit
$200 minimum
deposit
$150 minimum
deposit
$150 minimum
deposit
$100 minimum
deposit
$150 minimum
deposit
$65 per
inspection
15¢ per page Copies of reports and documents
Hydrant flow test
Fire Clearance
$150 fee + water cost
:525 persons = $50.00
Pre Inspection .:25 persons= $100.00
False alarms:
a. The first three responses in any 365 day period
b. For the 4th and each additional response in
any 365 day period
Non-Emergency response to residential care
facility for caregiver assistance
Other:

Cost recovery for Fire Dept response necessitated
by negligent; intentional or for alcohol/drug
related acts; cost recovery for Fire Dept response for
water removal; cost recovery for Fire Dept response
for a nonresident vehicle fire
Weed abatement
Cost recovery for Fire Department clean up
of spills at accident scenes.

Standby Ambulance with 2 Firefighter/Paramedics

5. Fire Safety Equipment Development Impact Fee
(Payable upon submission of an application to the City for a building permit in the Hillside Development Area. The City Council ordered that the issuance of a building permit by the City Building Department for each dwelling unit shall be subject to and conditioned upon the payment of the Fire Safety Equipment Fee to the City of La Verne for each such dwelling unit. Said fee will remain in effect until such time as the situation warrants that the City Council readjust said fee pursuant to the Fire Safety Equipment Ordinance.)
Resolution No. 14- 22
No charge
$125
$100
per occurrence
$335 per engine co.
per hour or fraction
thereof. $203 per
medical unit per hour
or fraction thereof
$100 plus
Actual cost
incurred
$360
$203 per hour or
fraction thereof)
$385

Page 17 ends

Page 210 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
l"lt"I
T.

Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee
(Reference Ordinance No. 829 and Resolution 91-55)
On new residential projects in the Hillside Overlay Zone.

6. Emergency Medical Services
$7,504
The La Verne Fire Department, or its contracted billing service, will bill the insurers of La Verne residents, including Federal health care programs, but only to the extent of their insurance coverage to ensure no "out of pocket" costs.

Individuals who are not residents of the City of La Verne and have been a recipient of Emergency Medical Services shall be charged fees for services rendered without regard for "out of pocket" expenses.

Emergency Medical Service fees are established annually by Los Angeles County Department of Health Services.

Paramedic Ambulance Services:

Advanced Life Support
Basic Life Support
Paramedic patient assessment fee
Each additional patient
Dispatch Fee
Mileage per mile
Oxygen
Medical Supplies
Back-up Ambulance {Basic Life Support):

Use of back-up ambulance (transport only)
Non-emergency ambulance transport
Cost of Medical Supplies
L.A. Co. rate
L.A. Co. rate
$250
50% additional
$25
L.A. Co. rate
L.A. Co. rate
Cost+ 20%
$937
$937
Actual cost per
current L.A. Co. rates
NOTE: Pursuant to Section 3.24.030 of the La Verne Municipal Code, resident paramedic fees are set in April of each year by resolution of the ·city Council.

REGULATORY PERMIT FILING FEES

1. Those regulatory permits also requiring a City of La Verne business license and the term of the permit is the same as business license:
a. Business License Application Processing
b. Dance and/or live entertainment:

Processing fee for application
Regulatory Permit
All City-sponsored, events shall receive
permits without payment of fees.
c. Door -to-door solicitor
d. Fortune telling:

Processing fee for application
Regulatory Permit
e. Certificate of Necessity & Public Convenience:

Processing fee for application

2. Those regulatory permits not requiring a City of La Verne business license:
$30 for new business
$100
$100
$15
$100
$100
$50
Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 18

Page 211 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
a. Garage sales $10
Penalty for failure to obtain permit
an additional $5
1 b. Charitable/Religious/Nonprofit Exempt except when
solicitors are paid, for
which the fee shall be
2 $15
3 C. Christmas tree lots and/or $250 fee plus $250
Related Seasonal Sales cleanup deposit
4 3. The business of filming and videotaping within the City of La Verne:
a. Daily permit $300
5 b. Daily rental fee for City-owned
6 buildings or facilities excluding City
Parks and Recreational Facilities. $500
7 C. Use of other City services, equipment Actual cost per A.R. and/or personnel
8 4. Other regulatory permits not $15
specifically provided for elsewhere
9 u. ANIMAL CONTROL FEES
10 1. Dog License Fees
a. unaltered dog - 1 year/2 year license $45/$90
11 b. altered dog - 1 year/2 year license $20/$40
c. sr. citizen - altered dog - 1 yr/2 yr license $5/$10 12 d. sr. citizen - unaltered dog - 1 yr/2 yr license $35/$70 e. late application fee for new dog license $25
f. late renewal of dog license $25
13 2. Cat License Fees:
14 a. unaltered cat - 1 year $10
b. altered cat - 1 year $ 5
15 c. late application fee for new cat license $10
d. late renewal of cat license $10
16 3. Impound Fees:
a. dog - first incident $30
17 b. dog - second incident $60
c. dog - third incident $90
18 d. cat $10
e. small animals, i.e., rabbits, chickens, ducks, turtles $10 19 f. medium animals, i.e., goats, sheep, calves $25
g. large animals, i.e., horses, ponies, donkeys, $35
20 cows, pigs (trailer needed)

4. Food and Care (Per Day):
21 a.dog $10
b. cat $10
22 c. small animals $7
d. medium animals $10
23 e. large animals $25
f. all animals required to be quarantined at the shelter $15 24 5. Other Fees:
a. trailer fee $25
25 b. special animal permit $50
26 C. service fee on large animals requiring extra manpower $50 27 Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 19
28

Page 212 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 V.
d. owner release fee
- per animal
- per litter
- per on-site pick-up
- carcass removal (owner's)

OTHER FEES

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. Research activities (for requests outside the scope of the California Public Records Act, if staffing and workload permit, a project may be undertaken)
Returned check or returned electronic payment
Copying fee (except documents
pursuant to Fair Political Practice Act)
Providing Information on CD Media
Notary fee
City Council Agenda
City's annual budget or comprehensive annual financial report Passport Application Acceptance Service
Passport Photo Service

10. Certification of records

11. Emergency response costs related to DUI
alcohol/drug traffic collision incidents. (Authorized
by Govt Code Section 53150)

12. Sign recovery fee

13. Municipal Code Annual Supplement Service
$40
$30
$40
$40
Actual cost for time
based
on actual
salary including fringe
benefits of the staff
member working on
the project
$25
15¢ per page
$15
As set by State law
Available free on
website
$25
Fees established by
U.S. Dept. of State
$15 (for set of 2)
$10 per document,
plus copy fee
Actual cost
$10 per sign
$50 (includes postage)

14. Fees for rental of parks and recreation facilities and programs are established and maintained by the Community Services Director by administrative regulation.

15. Park, open space, and recreation fees. For credits, waivers or adjustments, see Chapter 3.20, La Verne Municipal Code.

Park, open space and recreation fees
New residential development
Senior residential development and second units
Dormitories and assisted care facilities
Very low, low, and moderate housing and mobile homes
New commercial, industrial and non-residential institutional space $4,500 per unit
$3,000 per unit
$1,500 per bed
$1,500 per unit
$0.40 per square foot
The fees apply to new development, including additions that result in at least a 25% net increase in gross floor area in the case of commercial, industrial, and non-residential institutional space.

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 20

Page 213 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29

16. Fees for rental of City vehicles and equipment shall be established and maintained by the Public Works Department by administrative regulation.

17. Where maximum fees are specified by state law, those fees shall prevail over any fee specified herein.

SECTION 3. Resolution No.13-22 is HEREBY RESCINDED upon the effective date of this Resolution.

SECTION 4. If any provision of this Resolution is held to be unconstitutional or unlawful, it is the intent of the City Council that such portion of this Resolution be severable from the remainder and that the remainder be given full force and effect.

SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and a copy of this Resolution shall be posted for the information of the general public. Fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution shall take effect July 1, 2014.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of May, 2014.

ATTEST:
hereb ce at the foregoing Resolution No .. 14-22 was duly and regularly adopted by the City City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the 5th day of May, 2014 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Ingels, Rosales, Carder, Redman, and Mayor Kendrick.

None.

Resolution No. 14- 22 Page 21

Page 214 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 INDEX

FEES & POLICIES FOR SERVICES
Resolution No. 14-22
(Effective July 1, 2014)
Animal Control Fees
Annexation Processing Fee
Appeals
Building Permits
Division of Land Filing Fees
Environmental Filing Fees
Fee Reduction for Economic Development Projects
Fire Department Fees
Improvements, Plan Checking & Inspection Fees
Land Use Filing Fees
Other Fees
Other Professional Services
Other Fees and Charges for Service
Parking Mitigation Development Impact Fee
Police Department Fees
Precise Plan Filing Fees
Public Works
Refuse and Recycling Collection Charges
Regulatory Permit Filing Fees
Sewer Service Charges
Storm Drain Facilities Fees
Underground Utilities Fee
Water Rates, Fees, Charges & Conditions of Service

Page 19 ends

Page 8 ends

Page 9 ends

Page 3 ends

Page 5 ends

Page 2 ends

Page 16 ends

Page 8 ends

Page 3 ends

Page 20 ends

Page 7 ends

Page 2 ends

Page 8 ends

Page 14 ends

Page 5 ends

Page 9 ends

Page 12 ends

Page 18 ends

Page 14 ends

Page 10 ends

Page 215 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Recording Requested By and
When Recorded Mail To:

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

EXHIBIT G

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
This ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between GILEAD SCIENCES, Inc., a Delaware Corporation("Assignor"), and ___________ , a ________ ("Assignee").

RECITALS
A. The City of La Verne ("City") and Assignor entered into that certain Development Agreement dated _______ , 2016 (the "Development Agreement"), with respect to the real property located in the City of La Verne, State of California more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Project Site"), and B. Assignor has obtained from the City certain development approvals and permits with respect to the development of the Project Site, including without limitation, approval of ____________ for the Project Site (collectively, the "Project Approvals").

C. Assignor intends to sell, and Assignee intends to purchase that portion, of the Project Site more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto (the "Transferred Property").

D. In connection with such purchase and sale, Assignor desires to transfer all of the Assignor's right, title, and interest in and to the Development Agreement and the Project Approvals with respect to the Transferred Property. Assignee desires to accept such assignment from Assignor and assume the obligations of Assignor under the Development Agreement and the Project Approvals with respect to the Transferred Property.

THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns and transfers to Assignee all of Assignor's right, title, and interest in and to the Development Agreement and the Project Approvals with respect to the Transferred Property. Assignee hereby accepts such assignment from Assignor.

2. Assumption. Assignee expressly assumes and agrees to keep, perform, and fulfill all the terms, conditions, covenants, and obligations required to be kept, performed, and fulfilled by Assignor under the Development Agreement and the Project Approvals with respect to the Transferred Property, including but not limited to those obligations specifically allocated to the Transferred Parcel as set forth on Exhibit "C" attached hereto. sf-3623410

Page 216 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

3. Effective Date. The execution by City of the attached receipt for this Agreement shall be considered as conclusive proof of delivery of this Agreement and of the assignment and assumption contained herein. This Agreement shall be effective upon its recordation in the Official Records of Los Angeles County, California, provided that Assignee has closed the purchase and sale transaction and acquired legal title to the Transferred Property.

4. Remainder of Project. Any and all rights or obligations pertaining to such portion of the Project Site other than the Transferred Property are expressly excluded from the assignment and assumption provided in Sections 1 and 2 above.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth next to their signatures below.

Date:

Date:
sf-3623410
"ASSIGNOR"
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., a
Delaware Corporation
By:--------------
Its: ----------------
"ASSIGNEE"
By: ----------------Its: ----------------
2

Page 217 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

RECEIPT BY CITY
The attached ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT 1s received and approved by the City of La Verne on this_ day of __________ _

CITY OF LA VERNE
By:

Mayor

State of California
County of _____________ )
On before me, ----------- -----------------(insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared ---------------------------who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature ______________ (Seal)
3 sf-3623410

Page 218 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 ORDINANCE NO. 1067

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO. 79-14DA, A REQUEST BY GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT

WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on March 21, 2016, and considered public testimony in accordance with City and State requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of La Verne as follows:

Section 1. Environmental Determination . The City Council HEREBY FINDS and DETERMINES that the proposed development agreement could not have a significant effect upon the environment and reaffirms the adopted Addendum to the La Verne Technology Center Initial Study- Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Page 219 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 1. The proposed development agreement is consistent with the General Plan in that the primary goal of the agreement is to extend the entitlement process for the second phase of the Gilead La Verne Campus, which would continue to be consistent with the General Plan's designation as "Commercial/Business Park".

2. 3.

4. 5.

The proposed development agreement is consistent with good city planning and zoning practices in that it allows the future construction of approximately 81,000 square feet for a phannaceutical manufacturing facility in addition to the 320,000 square foot building currently under construction.

Page 220 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
Section 7. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the thirty first (31st) day after its passage and adoption.
. Section 8. The Mayor shall sign and the Deputy City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th of April, 2016 ..

ATTEST:
d\\f:l cl cdlt\_,. r~t~tllcO
Lupe Gaeta Estrella, Deputy City Clerk
The foregoing Ordinance No. 1067 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City duly held on 21st day of March, 2016, and was thereafter, at a regular meeting of said Council duly held on 4th day of April, 2016, duly passed and adopted by the said City Council and thereupon duly signed by the Mayor of said City, attested by the City Clerk of said City, and passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Rosales, Hepburn, Carder, Redman, and Mayor Kendrick.

None.

None.
3 ~\ N ~ (Ulo\_t,~All ,t A_J
\tt{p~ G~ta Estrella, CMC
Deputy City Clerk
Ordinance No. 1067

Page 221 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF LA VERNE )
ss.

I, Lupe Gaeta Estrella, Deputy City Clerk of the City of La Verne, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No 1067 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City duly held on 21st day of March, 2016, and was thereafter, at a regular meeting of said Council duly held on 4th day of April, 2016, and duly passed and adopted by the said City Council and thereupon duly signed by the Mayor of said City, attested by the Deputy City Clerk of said City, and passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
(Seal)
Date: June 21, 2016
Hepburn, Rosales, Carder, Redman, and
Mayor Kendrick.

None.

None.
d~ ~~ ~o
Lupe Gaeta Estrella, CMC
Deputy City Clerk

Page 222 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
A
This page is part of your document • DO NOT DISCARD
~~~~ 20160791952
: .... .,. ... u:,~t 11m1001uim11111111111m11111111/DHIIII p3B~r \~le 1 Recorded/Filed in Official Records
lit .. ~ Recorder's Office, Los Angeles County,
x ,,_ California
c°'4t1Fol~~ 07/07/16 AT 02:24PM
PECLARATIOH DF l(ES~IC.TIOH FEES:
(f~OPE~TY TA)( ~OVE.NANT) TAXES:

OTHER:
?>ETWE~~ C::rlLEAP SCIEN~ES, PAID:

I Ne, . At-ID THE cn-y OF
L>- VE~HE
El2.!JIU
111111 II 1111111111111111 I II II II II I 11111111

LEADSHEET
11111111 i Ill II I II IIII Ill lU 111111 II 11111
201607072830046
00012264330
I IIIIII IIIII Ill lllll lllll lllll lllll 11111111111111111 007632759
SEQ:
01 DAR - Mail (Intake)
I IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII IIIII IIII Ill II llllll llllll 1111111111111111111 111111111111111 IIII IIII I 111111111111111 H 1111 I~ IIII IIIIIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII ~111111111111111111111111111111

THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED

0.00 0.00

Page 223 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
• -• J Recording Requested by:

Deputy City Clerk
City of La Verne
3660 "D" Street
La Verne, CA 91750
Document Number:12264330

I IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII Batch Number:7632759
I llllll lllll lllll /1111 !llll lllll lllll ll/11111

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER USE
_...._ _., .... ', \
_,""- •,. ,.. , .
,_,;'8' ~· \'- .......... ,., .t
Exemptfrom Recordation Fee Pe~~;,;;;~~•'::"~:. ~ ,• ',
C d S f 27383 ~ " ~ '- ' ,,_, .•
~n~Oibv ~~ <_,~•··
..... ~--..-,;~ ·---
Lupe Gaeta Estrella, Deputy City Ctirl<',0 ·-? :::.' , - City of La Verne . _,, \., ~~~ :_ _ ·, ,_- :
-·✓ •-'~:..:
-D-e-cl-a-ra-t-io_n_o_f_R_e_s_t_ri-ct-io-n-(P_r_o_p_e_rt_y_T_a_x __ c•ci~~~~t)··> between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and the City of
La Verne ,

Page 224 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION
[PROPERTY TAX COVENANT]

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

City of La Verne
3660 "D" Street
La Verne, CA 91750
Attention: City Clerk
Record for the Benefit of
The City of La Verne
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 27383
Space Reserved for Recorder's Use Only

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION
[Property Tax Covenant]
This DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION, ("Declaration") dated as of April 6, 2016 ("Effective Date"), is made and entered into by and among Gilead Sciences, Inc. ("Owner") and the City of La Verne, a California municipal corporation ("City").

RECITALS
A. Owner owns and occupies that certain real property comprising approximately 23 acres in the Business Park district of the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan, La Verne, California, more particularly described in Attachment A attached hereto ("Property").

B. Owner desires to further redevelop portions of the Property to accommodate Owner's current and future business needs with a combination of manufacturing, warehouse, office and laboratory space ("Project").

C. Concurrently herewith, Owner and City have entered into a Development Agreement dated April 6, 2016, recorded in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Instrument No. _____ ("Development Agreement"). The Development Agreement provides, among other things, for City's grant of vested rights to Owner and agreement to limit imposition of future impact fees and exactions, thereby reducing Owner's actual or perceived risk in undertaking the Project. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Development Agreement.

D. In consideration of the benefits conferred to Owner and its successors and assigns under the Development Agreement, Owner has agreed that should Owner or its successors or assigns obtain a tax exemption for the Property or the Project or any portion sf-3456544

Page 225 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
thereof, Owner or its successor-in-interest shall make payments in lieu of property taxes to the City, all as set forth in the Development Agreement.

E. Owner and City have agreed to execute and record this Declaration in order to bind Owner and its successors and assigns to the property tax exemption and in lieu payment obligations, as described in the Development Agreement and as more particularly set forth herein.

F. The intent and purpose of this Declaration is to ensure that the Property shall be conveyed, hypothecated and encumbered, subject to the obligations provided for herein.

G. The enforcement of the obligations set forth herein will ensure that the City will not suffer any loss of its share of property tax revenues that are used to deliver services to the Property, therefore benefitting the City and Owner.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties hereto, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Owner on behalf of itself and its heirs, executors, successors, assigns and each successor in interest hereby covenants and agrees as follows:

1. In the event Owner or any of its operators or lessees or its and their successors- or assigns applies for and is granted a "welfare exemption" pursuant to Section 214 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, or any successor provision, or any other exemption from the payment of real or personal property taxes of any nature, Owner shall pay annually to the City a payment in lieu of taxes in an amount equal to the portion of the real and personal property tax levy the City would have received but for the exemption as determined by the City and as increased annually by the amount permitted under the provisions of Article XIIIA, Section 2, of the California Constitution (the "In Lieu Payment").

1. The In Lieu Payment shall be payable on the date that the second installment of property taxes would otherwise have been due and payable. Any In Lieu Payment which is not paid when due shall accrue interest at the lesser of ten percent ( 10%) per annum or the highest rate allowed by applicable law.

2. The covenants contained in this Declaration shall remain in effect in perpetuity; any successor of Owner to the Property shall be bound by the covenants, whether such successor's title was acquired by foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, trustee's sale or otherwise.

3. Failure by Owner or its successors or assigns to perform its or their obligations hereunder shall constitute a default under this Declaration, and City may institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy such default, to recover damages for such default or to obtain any other remedy whether at law or in equity, consistent with the purpose of this Declaration.

4. City is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and provisions of this Declaration and of the covenants running with the land, for and in its own right and for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parties, public or private, in whose favor and for whose 2 sf-3456544

Page 226 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
benefit this Declaration and the covenants running with the land have been provided, without regard to whether City has been, remains or is an owner of any land or interest therein in the Property or Project, City shall have the right, if this Declaration or covenants are breached, to exercise all rights and remedies, and to maintain any actions or suits at law or in equity or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such breaches to which it may be entitled.

5. Any notice, demand or request which may be permitted, required or desired to be given in connection herewith shall be given in writing and directed to the City and Owner as follows:
sf-3456544
with a copy to:

Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Attention: VP of Facilities and Operations
333 Lakeside Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Attention: General Counsel (HS)
333 Lakeside Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
3

Page 227 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
with a copy to:

Zane O. Gresham
Morrison & Foerster LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
Notices to be deemed effective if delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, commercial courier, with delivery to be effective upon verification of receipt, then deemed received the following business day. Any party may change its respective address for notices by providing written notice of such change to the other party.

6. This Declaration, including the Recitals and Attachment A (which is hereby incorporated by reference), together with the Development Agreement, contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Declaration and the Development Agreement. In the event of any express conflict between this Declaration and the Development Agreement, the provisions of this Declaration shall control. No waiver, alteration, modification, or termination of this Declaration shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the authorized parties hereof.

7. No waiver of any provision of this Declaration shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver.

8. This Declaration shall be deemed to be jointly prepared by all parties hereto, and any ambiguities or uncertainties herein shall not be construed for or against either of the parties hereto. The words "including," "included," "include" and words of similar import shall be not be interpreted as words of exclusion but shall instead be interpreted as though followed by the words "but not limited to" or "without limitation." No waiver by City of any breach or default of any provision of this Declaration shall be deemed a waiver of any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach or default by Owner of the same or any other provision. The invalidity of any provision of this Declaration as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction shall in no way affect the validity of any other provision hereof.

9. Each represents and warrants that it has the full right, power and authority to carry out its obligations under this Declaration. The individuals executing this Declaration on behalf of the parties represent and warrant that they have full power and authority to execute and deliver this Declaration on behalf of such party.

10. All provisions of this Declaration, including the benefits and burdens, are equitable servitudes, run with the Property and the Project and are binding upon the heirs, executors, successors, assigns and personal representatives of Owner and inure to the benefit of City and its successors and assigns. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument covering, conveying or otherwise transferring the Property and/or the Project or any portion thereof or 4 sf-3456544

Page 228 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
interest therein shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to this Declaration.

11. This Declaration shall not be deemed to create any third-party beneficiary rights for any person or entity.

12. In the event any action is brought by any party hereto as against another party hereto for the enforcement or declaration of any right or remedy in or under this Declaration or for the breach of any covenant or condition hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover, and the other party agrees to pay, all fees and costs to be fixed by the court therein including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and costs.

13. This Declaration may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Declaration as of the Effective Date.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES}
5 sf-3456544

Page 229 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
A~ By: ~~~
Lupe Gaeta Estrella, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By~~
~ertKres~y
6 sf-3456544
"CITY"

CITY OF LA VERNE,
a municipal corporation
"OWNER"
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., a Delaware

Page 230 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE§ 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
) County of ~ ~
On l\~n \ 2.le, 20 I \I before me, L, -L ~tkix. ~iY--t
Date Here Insert Name and Title of the
personally appeared -~_,___V_r\ __ ~-----=---~--.:...-cl_v_\_;:(;_K._--=--------------- Name(s) of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(i_ whose name(,lis/a{e subscribed to the within instrumejlt and acknowledged to me that he/~ executed the same in his/~authorized capacity~nd that by his/~signatur~on the instrument the person(~ or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~cted, executed the instrument.

LUPE GAETA ESTRELLA
Commission " 2032918
Notary Public • California
Los An
Comm. E
Place Notary Seal Above
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signaturdl'f&: ~~ ~
Signature of Notary Public
---------------oPnONAL ______________ _
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document , •
Title or Type of Document: te.Ja\#JVY\ 0-\ ~>rric-\1 V1\ Document Date: ~'<l \ ~l 2-D I lo Number of Pages: Y' Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ____________ _ Capacity(ies) Claimed by Si er(sl
Signer's Name: V
~orporate Officer - Title(s): __,_· -'--"~1-.l.L..___ __ □ Partner - □ Limited □ General
Signer's Name: ___________ _
□ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _
□ Partner - □ Limited □ General
□ Individual □ Attorney in Fact
□ Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator
□ Individual □ Attorney in Fact
□ Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator
□ Other: .

Signer Is Representing: u-\y \') 1 l.A Ve (he__
□ Other: ______________ _
Signer Is Representing: ________ _
©2014 National Notary Association• www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907

Page 231 of 326 ends

State of California
County of Li.b ~~
On ~ 2i w~ before me, ~ ~ \2,"C:,~ No¾ ':i Ou..bltc.~
Date Here Insert Name and Title of theOfficer
personally appeared ~,v+ K\f..e S S.
------
Name(s) of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person~whose name~s/~ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/s~ executed the same 1fi.__ his/~~uthorized capacity(i~nd that by his/~ signature(J5)...Qrl the instrument the persori'(:4.__ or the entity upon behalf of which the perso~cted, executed the instrument.

Place Notary Sea/ Above
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signatu,Cl)~ ~ ~ trt;i1w
SiiJn; ure of Notary Public
. OPTIONAL
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document \ .

Title or Type of Document: ~\M)vi\. ttt Re~to c.& et;'\ Document Date: 4:- (e- \ <y Number of Pages: h Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ~ ~ l( t \t-1?f C~ t.,lL-- Capacity(ies) Claimed by Si ner(s)
Signer's Name: ~ Signer's Name: ____________ _
zycorporate Officer - Title(s): • □ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _ LJ'Partner - □ Limited □ General □ Partner - □ Limited □ General □ Individual □ Attorney in Fact □ Individual □ Attorney in Fact □ Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator □ Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator □ Other: _____________ ,_____ □ Other: ______________ _ Signer Is Representing: ~ '9-¾' LA\JL().L. Signer Is Representing: ________ _ • ©2014 National Notary Association• www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907

Page 232 of 326 ends

State of Cali~ornia
County of Jves ~e,u,,S )
On /'h,"4 '3 , 2., I (,, before me, ~ n .IC .._ 1? .«r~ a. n , J\Jo-h~ (,· c- , Date r Here Insert Nam ~d Title of the -/(;er
personally appeared k Fe. lQ_tt.e h kS tr-e I } tl_
Name(s) of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person~ whose name(s) is/a,:e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that l=teishe/1fley executed the same in Ris/her/tReir authorized capacity(~, and that byM/her/tAeiF signature(.8) on the instrument the person(sj, or the entity upon behalf of which the person~ acted, executed the instrument.

Place Notary Seal Above
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
---------------oPTIONAL---------------
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: _____________ Document Date: _______ _ Number of Pages: ___ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ____________ _ Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: ___________ _ Signer's Name: ___________ _ □ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _ □ Corporate Officer - Title(s): ______ _ □ Partner - □ Limited □ General □ Partner - □ Limited □ General □ Individual □ Attorney in Fact □ Individual □ Attorney in Fact D Trustee D Guardian or Conservator D Trustee □ Guardian or Conservator □ Other: ______________ _ □ Other: ______________ _
Signer Is Representing: ________ _ Signer Is Representing: ________ _ • ©2014 National Notary Association• www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907

Page 233 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California
County of San Mateo )
on __ ti/_%....... ___ f:l_/_,_;f-_Jo---=--1 ..... k~· _ before me, Stephanie Dong, Notary Public J (insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared Kevin Young
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s}, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

STEPHANIE DONG
WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Commission ti 2073624
~ Notary Public • California I
z San Mateo County :!:
t .. 0 0 .MJz0L"T·J¥iLe5ig' !·3°Jtl
(Seal)

Page 234 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validitv of that document.

State of California
County of San Mateo
on /JJ ~ 3 I 1a:,/ tJ before me, Stephanie Dong, Notary Public (insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared Kevin Young
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person~ whose name~ is/a;e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/s~/tj)e'y executed the same in his/h~/th~r authorized capacity(i~, and that by his/~r/t~ir signature(~ on the instrument the person(~ or the entity upon behalf of which the person~ acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

STEPHANIE DONG
WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Commission ti 2073624
~ Notary Public • California f
z San Mateo County -
J. 0 0 0 0 0 MJ f 01"TJeiLeVM1 :-1°1 tl
(Seal)

Page 235 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 1360

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,

CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE FIRST

AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA VERNE AND GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE ARROW CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN, CASE NO. 56-26DA
WHEREAS, Gilead Sciences, Inc. has submitted an application requesting approval of a First Amendment to the Development Agreement approved by the City Council on May 5, 2016, under Case No. 79-14DA, for property located at 1800 Wheeler Avenue, within the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Development Agreement established a ten-year term and provided for a one-time five-year extension by mutual agreement of the parties; and WHEREAS, the applicant and the City desire to extend the term of the Development Agreement for an additional five-year period, retroactively commencing on May 6, 2026, and continuing through May 5, 2031; and
WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment also revises Section 7(a) of the Development Agreement regarding the applicable impact fees during the extended term; and
WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment does not modify the approved project, increase development intensity, alter approved land uses, change development standards , or authorize additional development beyond that previously approved; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of La Verne conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Case No. 56-26DA, at which time all interested persons were afforded the opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered all testimony, staff reports, exhibits, and other information presented during the public hearing process.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as substantive findings of this Resolution .

SECTION 2. Based upon the entire record before the Planning Commission and the findings set forth herein and in the draft Resolution attached hereto as Exhibit A, the Planning Commission of the City of La Verne hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Resolution.

Page 236 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
The Planning Commission finds as follows:

A. The proposed First Amendment is consistent with the intent and purpose of the original Development Agreement approved under Case No. 79-14DA and will continue to provide certainty regarding development rights and obligations for the subject property.

B. The proposed First Amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City of La Verne General Plan and the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan because it does not alter the approved land uses, development standards, or permitted development intensity.

C. The proposed First Amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare because it does not authorize additional development and merely extends the duration of the existing Development Agreement while clarifying impact fee provisions.

D. The proposed First Amendment remains compatible with surrounding land uses because it does not result in any physical changes to the site or modifications to approved project entitlements.

SECTION 3. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed First Amendment has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The original Development Agreement and associated project approvals were previously evaluated through an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and subsequent Addendum. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required because there are no substantial changes to the project, no substantial changes in circumstances, and no new information of substantial importance that would require major revisions to the previously approved environmental documents.

SECTION 4. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at City Hall, 3660 D St, La Verne, CA 91750. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6 .

SECTION 5. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

SECTION 6. Signature. The Chairperson shall sign, and the Secretary shall attest to the adoption of Resolution No. 1360.

Page 237 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this tenth day of June 2026, by the Planning Commission at La Verne , California.

Chairperson, Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Commission
Attachment A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA

VERNE, CALIFORNIA

Page 238 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1360 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Carney, Chang, Conrad, Ramos
NOES:

ABSENT : Duffy
ABSTAIN:

Okt&Etr
Natalie Hiatt, Administrative Secretary

ORDINANCE NO. _____

A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA,

WHEREAS, Gilead Sciences, Inc. ("Developer") and the City of La Verne entered into a Development Agreement approved by the City Council on May 5, 2016, under Case No. 79-14DA for property at 1800 Wheeler Avenue, located within the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan; and

WHEREAS, Section 3 of the Development Agreement established an initial ten-year term and provided for a one-time five-year extension by mutual agreement of the parties; and

WHEREAS, the Developer has requested approval of a First Amendment to the Development Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional five-year period, retroactively commencing on May 6, 2026, and continuing through May 5, 2031; and

WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment also amends Section 7(a) of the Development Agreement regarding applicable impact fees during the extended term; and

WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment does not modify approved land uses, development standards, development intensity, project entitlements, or the physical development approved for the property; and

WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Case No. 56-26DA and adopted Resolution No. 1360 recommending that the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Development Agreement; and

WHEREAS, on ____________, 2026, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Case No. 56-26DA and considered all testimony, reports, exhibits, and other evidence presented; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has independently reviewed and considered the entire administrative record for the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as substantive findings of this Ordinance.

Page 239 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

SECTION 2. Based upon the entire record before the City Council and the findings set forth herein and in the Ordinance, the City Council of the City of La Verne hereby adopt this Ordiniance.

The City Council finds as follows:

D. The proposed First Amendment remains compatible with surrounding land uses because it does not result in any physical changes to the site or modifications to approved project entitlements.

SECTION 3. Environmental Determination: The City Council finds that the proposed First Amendment has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The original Development Agreement and associated project approvals were previously evaluated through an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and subsequent Addendum. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required because there are no substantial changes to the project, no substantial changes in circumstances, and no new information of substantial importance that would require major revisions to the previously approved environmental documents.

SECTION 4. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance has been based are located at City Hall, 3660 D St, La Verne, CA 91750. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6.

SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption.

SECTION 6. Signature. The Chairperson shall sign, and the Secretary shall attest to the adoption of Ordinance No. ______.

Page 240 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2026, by the City Council at La Verne, California.

Tim Hepburn, Mayor

ATTEST:

Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk

Attachment: First Amendment to the Development Agreement to extend the term of the Gilead Agreement

Page 241 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA VERNE AND GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.

FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE ARROW CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN CASE NO. 56-26DA

This First Amendment to Development Agreement (“First Amendment”) is entered into effective this ____ day of ____________, 2026, by and between the City of La Verne (“City”), a general law city, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Developer”), who agree as follows:

1. Recitals.

This First Amendment is made with reference to the following facts and circumstances:

A. On or about May 5, 2016, the City and Developer entered into that certain Development Agreement approved under Case No. 79-14DA (“Development Agreement”) regarding the approximately 23-acre property located within the Arrow Corridor Specific Plan in the City of La Verne.

B. Section 3 of the Development Agreement provides that the term of the Agreement may be extended for an additional five-year term by mutual agreement of the parties prior to expiration of the Agreement.

C. The initial ten-year term of the Development Agreement expired on May 5, 2026, prior to which Developer requested the City initiate the process to extend the agreement for the additional five-year term.

D. The City and Developer desire to retroactively extend the term of the Development Agreement for an additional five-year period commencing May 6, 2026 and expiring May 5, 2031, in order to maintain continuity of the vested rights and obligations established under the Development Agreement.

E. The City and Developer further desire to amend Section 7(a) of the Development Agreement regarding applicable Impact Fees during the extended term of the Agreement.

F. This First Amendment is processed under Case No. 56-26DA.

2. Amendment to Section 3 – Term; Duration.

Section 3 of the Development Agreement is hereby amended to provide that the term of the Development Agreement is extended for an additional five-year period commencing retroactively on May 6, 2026 and continuing through May 5, 2031. Except as expressly amended herein, all other provisions of Section 3 shall remain in full force and effect.

3. Amendment to Section 7(a) – Impact Fees.

Section 7(a) of the Development Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Page 242 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
“During the term of this Agreement as Amended, the Impact Fees charged for the Project shall be those in existence as of, and in the amount in effect as of January 1, 2027.”

4. Remaining Provisions Effective.

Except as specifically amended herein, all remaining provisions of the Development Agreement dated May 5, 2016, approved under Case No. 79-14DA, shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment.

CITY OF LA VERNE:

Tim Hepburn, Mayor

Dated:

ATTEST:

Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk

Dated:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

Dated: ______________________

APPLICANT

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.,

Name: _________________________

Title: __________________________

Dated: ______________________

Page 243 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report

DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Eric Scherer, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: FIRST READING OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR NONCONFORMING LOT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

SUMMARY
The proposed ordinance amends Section 18.10.060 of the La Verne Municipal Code to create a limited exception to the lot merger requirement for nonconforming lots when the requirement would interfere with the development of qualifying affordable housing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance at its June 10, 2026, meeting.

RECOMMENDATION
That upon conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council:

1. Determine that the proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), the common sense exemption; and

2. Introduce by title only and waive further reading of an Ordinance titled, "AN ORDINANCE

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 18.10.060 OF THE LA VERNE MUNICIPAL CODE TO FACILITATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING" amending Section 18.10.060 of the La Verne Municipal Code related to nonconforming lot development standards to facilitate affordable housing opportunities.

DISCUSSION
The City is required to continually evaluate and remove governmental constraints that may hinder the development of housing, particularly affordable housing. During Staff's review of the City's zoning regulations and implementation of the Housing Element, Section 18.10.060(B)(7) was identified as a potential constraint in circumstances involving contiguous nonconforming lots under common ownership. Currently, the Municipal Code requires contiguous nonconforming lots held under common ownership to merge into a single parcel. While this requirement promotes orderly development and reduces nonconforming conditions, it may also limit opportunities for the development of affordable housing by preventing the separate development of individual lots.

The proposed ordinance creates a narrowly tailored exception to the lot merger requirement when enforcement of the merger provision would interfere with the development of an affordable housing project serving low- or moderate-income households, as defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 50093. The exception would apply only to qualifying affordable housing projects and would not affect the City's treatment of nonconforming lots in

Page 244 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
First Reading of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Nonconforming Lot Development Standards., Page 2

any other circumstance.

The amendment supports State housing laws and the goals and policies of the City's Housing Element by removing a regulatory barrier that could impede affordable housing development.

The proposed amendment provides additional flexibility for affordable housing projects while preserving the City's existing development standards and zoning regulations for all other properties.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Approval of the First Reading and eventual Adoption of the proposed ordinance will not have an immediate fiscal impact on the City's General Fund. The amendment is a regulatory change that removes a potential constraint to affordable housing development and does not authorize construction or require the expenditure of City funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), commonly known as the "commonsense exemption." The amendment does not approve a specific development project, authorize new construction, or modify allowable land uses, densities, or development standards. Rather, it establishes a limited exception to an existing procedural requirement for qualifying affordable housing projects. It can be seen with certainty that adoption of the ordinance will not result in a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, the proposed ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3).

LEGAL REVIEW
The proposed ordinance has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

ATTACHMENTS

1. DRAFT ORD

2. PC Reso
1359

Report Prepared By: Coordinated with:

Candice Bowcock, Plann
ing Manager Lisa
Kranitz, Assistant City Attorney

Page 245 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 18.10.060 OF THE LA VERNE

MUNICIPAL CODE TO FACILITATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
WHEREAS, Section 18.10.060 of the La Verne Municipal Code relates to nonconforming uses, lots, and structures; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.10.060B.7 of the La Verne Municipal Code provides that when two nonconforming lots are under common ownership, they should be merged; and
WHEREAS, it has come to staff’s attention that Section 18.10.060B.7 can prevent the development of affordable housing on individual lots; and WHEREAS, staff believes it is in the public interest to increase opportunities for affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and
WHEREAS, at the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on XX, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Section 18.10.060B.7 of the La Verne Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, all other provisions remain the same:
§ 18.10.060 Nonconforming uses, lots, and structures.
* * *
B. Lawfully established nonconforming uses, structures, and lots may be continued, provided such nonconforming uses, structures, and lots are not in violation of any other ordinance or law. Nonconformities are provided for as follows:
* * *

7. Nonconforming Lot Development. A single nonconforming lot shall be developed to the standards of the zone in which it is placed. In the case of single ownership of two or more contiguous nonconforming lots, they shall be merged and lot lines redrawn, so that the resulting lot or lots conform or conform more closely to the standards of the applicable zone. This provision shall not apply if the application thereof

Page 246 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

would interfere with an affordable housing project for low or moderate income households as defined in California Health and Safety Code section 50093.

SECTION 2. This project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the commonsense exemption of CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as the modification to the City’s zoning ordinance simply limits the requirement to merge substandard properties under common ownership.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 30 th day after passage.

SECTION 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which time the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be processed as required by law.

SECTION 5. Transmission to HCD. The City Clerk shall send a copy of this Ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community Development as required by State law.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ________day of ________, 2026, by the City Council at La Verne, California.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Mayor of the City of La Verne

ATTEST:

City Clerk

Page 247 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

Page 248 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 1359

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,

CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE ADOPT AN ORDINANCE FOR CASE NO. 57-26ZA AMENDING SECTION

18.10.060 OF THE LA VERNE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO NONCONFORMING

LOT DEVELOPMENT TO FACILITATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INCLUDING A

DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (b)(3)
WHEREAS, Sections 2.48.020 through 2.48.165 of the La Verne Municipal Code empower the Planning Commission to recommend appropriate legislation to the City Council regarding the orderly growth, development, and environmental character of the community; and
WHEREAS, both Chapter 18.112 of the La Verne Municipal Code and state law require the Planning Commission to hold a noticed public hearing on proposed changes to the zoning ordinance of La Verne; and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 25, 2026; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.10.060 of the La Verne Municipal Code relates to nonconforming uses, lots, and structures; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.10.060B.7 of the La Verne.Municipal Code provides that when two nonconforming lots are under common ownership, they shall be merged; and WHEREAS, staff has determined that the application of Section 18.10.060B. 7 may interfere with opportunities to develop affordable housing on individual lots; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would provide an exception to the lot merger requirement where application of the requirement would interfere with an affordable housing project for low- or moderate-income households as defined in California Health and Safety Code section 50093; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that increasing opportunities for affordable housing is in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to the commonsense exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15061 (b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that the proposed amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment; and

Page 249 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the matters set forth in this Resolution, at which time the Planning Commission considered all evidence presented , both oral and written; and WHEREAS , all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as substantive findings of this Resolution.

SECTION 2. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit A amending Section 18.10.060 of the La Verne Municipal Code related to nonconforming lot development and affordable housing based upon the entire record before the Planning Commission.

SECTION 3. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at City Hall, 3660 D Street, La Verne, CA 91750. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6.

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

SECTION 5. Signature. The Chairperson shall sign, and the Secretary shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution .

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June, 2026, by th Commission at La Verne, California.
hairperson , Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Commission
Exhibit A

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 18.10.060 OF THE LA VERNE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED

TO NONCONFORMING LOT DEVELOPMENT TO FACILITATE AFFORDABLE

HOUSING AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (b)(3).

Page 250 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026

CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1359 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Carney, Chang, Conrad , Ramos
NOES:

ABSENT: Duffy
ABSTAIN:

Natalie Hiatt, Administrative Secretary
City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report

DATE: August 3, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Danny Wu, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: AWARD OF ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT TO CMAX COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE, INC. FOR CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING SERVICE.

SUMMARY
The City's previous annual street sweeping agreement expired on June 30, 2026, following the contractor's decision not to renew the agreement under terms acceptable to the City. To ensure uninterrupted citywide street sweeping services, staff negotiated a one-year interim Maintenance Services Agreement with CMAX Commercial Maintenance, Inc. while preserving the City's ability to conduct a competitive procurement for a new multi-year contract later this year. It is recommended that the City Council approve a one-year Maintenance Services Agreement with CMAX for the period of July 1, 2026, thru June 30, 2027, for a not-to-exceed price of $173,000.00, including a $13,000 contingency available for City-authorized emergency or supplemental sweeping services.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Waive the formal bidding requirement and approve a One-Year Maintenance Services Agreement between the City of La Verne and CMAX Commercial Maintenance, Inc. for Citywide Street Sweeping Services for a not-to-exceed price of $173,000.00, including a $13,000 contingency, for the period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any non-substantive documents necessary to administer and implement the Agreement.

DISCUSSION
Street sweeping supports compliance with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit by reducing sediment, trash, and other pollutants from entering the storm drain system. In addition to improving roadway cleanliness and community appearance, routine street sweeping is one of the City's primary stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) and plays an important role in supporting compliance with the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements.

The City's previous annual street sweeping agreement with Athens Services expired on June 30, 2026. During renewal discussions, Athens advised the City that it was unwilling to continue providing services under the existing agreement and requested a substantially greater price increase than the City considered to be in its best financial interest. The fiscal year 2025-26

Page 251 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Award of One-Year Maintenance Services Agreement to CMAX Commercial Maintenance, Inc. for Citywide Street Sweeping Service., Page 2

price per curb mile was $39.14 and Athens new rate for fiscal year 2026-27 would have increased by 18% resulting in a $46.18 per curb mile cost. After evaluating the proposal, staff determined that renewing the existing agreement was not fiscally prudent and began identifying qualified replacement providers capable of immediately assuming the City's citywide street sweeping operations. Staff evaluated available alternatives and determined that securing a qualified replacement contractor capable of immediately assuming citywide street sweeping operations was necessary to avoid an interruption in this essential public service.

Staff evaluated CMAX Commercial Maintenance, Inc. based on its municipal experience, operational capacity, available equipment, and ability to immediately assume citywide street sweeping services without interruption. CMAX demonstrated the personnel, equipment, technology, and emergency response capabilities necessary to provide reliable routine and emergency street sweeping services while supporting the City's operational and regulatory needs. CMAX also demonstrated the ability to mobilize immediately upon contract award, ensuring there would be no interruption to the City's scheduled street sweeping operations. The proposed agreement includes routine scheduled street sweeping, emergency response services, special event support, reporting requirements, and other operational services necessary to maintain the City's roadway network and assist with stormwater compliance.

Additionally, CMAX presented a proposal of $39.14 per curb mile which met the current cost the City was paying to Athens.

Staff recommends this agreement as an interim one-year solution that ensures continuity of this essential public service while preserving the City's ability to conduct a comprehensive competitive procurement. Later this year, staff will prepare and publicly advertise a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a new multi-year citywide street sweeping services contract. The RFP process will provide qualified firms an opportunity to compete and will allow the City to evaluate qualifications, municipal experience, equipment, service approach, technology, emergency response capability, pricing, and overall value before returning to the City Council with a recommendation for a long-term contract award.

Because uninterrupted street sweeping services are critical to maintaining public health, protecting water quality, preserving regulatory compliance, and supporting essential municipal operations, staff determined that a lapse in service was not an acceptable option. Although the City's Purchasing Policy, Administrative Regulation 204, generally requires formal bidding for contracts exceeding $75,000, staff recommends the City Council waive the formal bidding requirement for this one-year interim agreement based on the following findings:
• The existing contract extension for the current service provider was not exercised because the proposed pricing exceeded what was available within the City's budget. • Staff conducted a competitive Request for Qualifications/Request for Quotes process to obtain competitive pricing for an interim period.
• The agreement is limited to one year, at the same cost as the previous agreement and is intended solely to maintain continuity of services while staff prepares and conducts a comprehensive formal Request for Proposals.

Page 252 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
Award of One-Year Maintenance Services Agreement to CMAX Commercial Maintenance, Inc. for Citywide Street Sweeping Service., Page 3

• The interim procurement provides the City with competitive pricing while allowing sufficient time to develop complete specifications and conduct a formal competitive solicitation for a long-term agreement.

Staff recommends this agreement as an interim one-year solution that provides sufficient time to develop updated service specifications, solicit competitive proposals, and complete a thorough evaluation process for a new multi-year street sweeping services contract.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Funding for these services is included in the Public Works Department's Fiscal Year 2026-27 operating budget. Any use of the $13,000 contingency will require prior City staff authorization for emergency response, storm cleanup, special events, or other supplemental sweeping services and will be managed within existing appropriations.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The approval of this agreement is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because it constitutes an administrative activity that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

LEGAL REVIEW
The Agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

ATTACHMENTS

1. CMAX MAINTENANCE COMPANY Maintenance Services Agreement -Exhibit A- PW 26 DW

2. Exhibit B- CMAX La Verne Street Sweeping Proposal

Report Prepared By:

Ramiro Nunez, Maintenance Manager

Page 253 of 326 ends

Agenda Packet - August 3, 2026
1 CMAX Commercial Maintenance, Inc.

Form Rev. 6-4-24

CITY OF LA VERNE

STREET SWEEPING MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH
CMAX COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE, INC.

THIS MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 1st day of July, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF LA VERNE, a municipal corporation (“City”), and CMAX COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE, INC., a California corporation (“Contractor”).

W I T N E S S E T H :

A. City proposes to utilize the services of Contractor as an independent contractor to provide maintenance of City property, as more fully described herein; and

B. Contractor represents that it has the experience and expertise to properly perform such services and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perform the services; and C. City and Contractor desire to contract for the services and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection with the performance of such services; and

D. No official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions of Sections 1090-1092 of the California Government Code, in the subject matter of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR

1.1. Scope of Services. Contractor shall provide the street sweeping maintenance services described in the City’s Request for Proposal (“RFP”), attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and Contractor’s response to City’s RFP (the “Proposal”) attached hereto as Exhibit “B,” both incorporated herein (the “Services”)

1.2. Prevailing Wage Requirements.

(a) Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor is aware of the requirements of Chapter 1 (beginning at Section 1720, et seq.) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the California Labor Code, as well as Title 8, Section 16000, et seq. of the California Code of Regulations (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. This project is a “maintenance” project and requires compliance with the Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

Page 254 of 326 ends

La Verne City CouncilAugust 3, 2026

La Verne City Council
August 3, 2026