10 of 462
Net Impact
to Available
Revenue Expenditure Fund
No. Description Adjustments Adjustments Balance
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
LIBRARY IMPACT FEES FUND (#111)
22 Adjust library impact fees based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 1,000
TOTAL LIBRARY IMPACT FEES FUND 1,000 - 1,000
MEASURE LL FEES FUND (#113)
23 Adjust transient occupancy tax and short term lodging revenue based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 150,000
TOTAL MEASURE LL FEES FUND 150,000 - 150,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (#116/616)
24 Adjust transient occupancy tax a revenue based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 (240,000)
25 Adjust municipal code and vehicle code fines based on Fiscal Year 2024/25 actuals and actual revenue collected through March 2026 314,000 26 Transfer to General Fund to increase contingency reserve 200,000 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 74,000 200,000 (126,000) PARKING FUND (#118/618)
27 Adjust parking revenues based on Fiscal Year 2024/25 actuals and actual revenue collected through March 2026 331,800
28 Transfer to Insurance and Benefits Fund to reduce fund deficit due to FY 2024/25 settlement and claims costs 1,000,000
29 Transfer to Disaster Contingency Fund to replenish appropriation approved by City Council for costs associated with the Rancho Fire 115,905 30 Permits, printing and postage for biannual shoppers permit renewals 15,000 TOTAL PARKING FUND 331,800 1,130,905 (799,105)
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FUND (#119)
31 Increase funding to Wildfire Mitigation & Fire Safety Fund based on investment income earned during Fiscal Year 2024/25 41,788 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FUND - 41,788 (41,788) ART IN-LIEU FEES FUND (#123)
32 Adjust Art in Lieu fees based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 45,000 TOTAL ART IN LIEU FEES FUND 45,000 - 45,000
INSURANCE AND BENEFITS FUND (#126)
33 Transfer from Parking Fund to reduce fund deficit due to FY 2024/25 settlement and claims costs 1,000,000
34 Workers compensation claim reimbursements received from the City's insurance provider through March 2026; offset by additional funding for workers compensation claims 200,000 200,000
TOTAL INSURANCE & BENEFITS FUND 1,200,000 200,000 1,000,000
11 of 462
Net Impact
to Available
Revenue Expenditure Fund
No. Description Adjustments Adjustments Balance
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND (#128)
35 Proceeds from auction sales of City vehicles based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 70,000
36 Interest earnings on loans provided to third parties 100,000 37 Purchase two Yamaha Waverunners 40,000
TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 170,000 40,000 130,000
GAS TAX FUND (#132)
38 Transfer RMRA funds on hand as of June 30, 2025, and shift Fiscal Year 2025/26 revenue estimates to new fund. 1,058,721 (603,100) 39 Adjust State Gas tax revenue estimates per revised information provided by the State Department of Finance in January 2026 11,635
40 Additional funding for increased general liability claims (reimbursement to Liability/Risk Management Fund #603)
41 Reallocate funding for Zone 7 Street Slurry Seal/Rehabilitation (CP2609) to new RMRA Fund (1,700,000)
TOTAL GAS TAX FUND (591,465) (641,279) 49,814
STREET LIGHTING & UTILITY FUND (#134/634)
42 Adjust property tax revenue based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 43,600
43 Funding for assessment loan program (prior year funding was not carried over in error) 200,000
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING & UTILITY FUND 43,600 200,000 (156,400) FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE FUND (#135)
44 Adjust asset forfeiture revenues and expenditures based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 100,000 25,500
TOTAL FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 25,500 100,000 (74,500) SOUTH LAGUNA FUND (#136)
45 Concession agreement for Aliso Beach Park 60,000
46 Reduce parking revenue based on Fiscal Year 2024/25 actuals and actual revenue collected through March 2026 (25,000)
47 Replenish Aliso Creek Ocean outlet monitoring and maintenance 100,000 48 Transfer $230,000 for Main Beach Management Plan Budget from Marine Safety (1362603) to Police Support Services (1362102) - net impact $0 TOTAL SOUTH LAGUNA FUND 35,000 100,000 (65,000)
12 of 462
Net Impact
to Available
Revenue Expenditure Fund
No. Description Adjustments Adjustments Balance
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WASTEWATER FUND (#137/637)
49 Adjust property tax revenue based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 (599,600)
50 Adjust investment income based on Fiscal Year 2024/25 actual 100,000 51 Reimbursement from SOCWA for Moulton Niguel Water District's exit (payment 2 of 3 per exit agreement) 676,665
52 Eliminate I-Bank loan funding for Fiscal Year 2025/26 (1,500,000) 53 Close projects that are either completed or funding will be reprioritized with implementation of Sewer Master Plan - Refer to Attachment 5 for detailed breakdown. (8,182,390)
TOTAL WASTEWATER FUND (1,322,935) (8,182,390) 6,859,455 STATE ASSET FORFEITURE FUND (#138)
54 Adjust asset forfeiture revenues based on actual revenue collected through March 2026 1,000
TOTAL STATE ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 1,000 - 1,000
DISASTER CONTINGENCY FUND (#140)
55 Transfer from Parking Fund to replenish appropriation approved by City Council for costs associated with the Rancho Fire 115,905 TOTAL DISASTER CONTINGENCY FUND 115,905 - 115,905
WILDFIRE MITIGATION & FIRE SAFETY FUND (#141/641)
56 Additional funding from Transportation Infrastructure Fund 41,788 57 Utility Undergrounding Study (prior year funding was not carried over) 10,000 WILDFIRE MITIGATION & FIRE SAFETY FUND (#141/641) 41,788 10,000 31,788 ANIMAL SHELTER DONATIONS FUND (#142)
58 Reallocate Fiscal Year 2025/26 revenue estimate from General Fund to new fund 25,000
59 Eliminate Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget to make funds available for future City Council appropriation as specific eligible expenditures are identified (1,497,850) TOTAL ANIMAL SHELTER DONATIONS FUND 25,000 (1,497,850) 1,522,850 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (AQMD) FUND (#143)
60 Reallocate Fiscal Year 2025/26 revenue estimate from the Transit Fund to new fund 30,000
TOTAL AQMD FUND 30,000 - 30,000
HOUSING FUND (#144)
61 Adjust short term rental revenue based on actual activity through March 2026 49,000 TOTAL HOUSING FUND 49,000 - 49,000
13 of 462
Net Impact
to Available
Revenue Expenditure Fund
No. Description Adjustments Adjustments Balance
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
PROPOSED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
CULTURAL ENVIROMENTAL STEWARDSHIP FUND (#149)
62 Fiscal Year 2025/26 funding allocated to this program under LBTMD management plan 510,000
63 Fiscal Year 2024/25 contribution from Visit Laguna Beach received in November 2025 240,000
TOTAL CULTURAL ENVIROMENTAL STEWARDSHIP FUND 750,000 - 750,000 MEASURE M FUND (#201)
64 Fiscal Year 2025/26 Measure M revenue offset by reimbursement to Capital Improvement Fund for Zone 6 Street Slurry Seal (CP2427) 615,800 615,800 TOTAL MEASURE M FUND 615,800 615,800 -
RMRA (#202)
65 Transfer from Gas Tax Fund for RMRA funds on hand as of June 30, 2025 1,058,721 66 Adjust State RMRA tax revenue estimates per revised information provided by the State Department of Finance in January 2026 608,395 67 Adjust for anticipated interest earnings 35,000
68 Reallocate funding for Zone 7 Street Slurry Seal/Rehabilitation (CP2609) to new RMRA Fund 1,700,000
TOTAL RMRA FUND 1,702,116 1,700,000 2,116
SENIOR MOBILITY TRANSPORTATION FUND (#203)
69 Reallocate Senior Mobility Transportation grant funds received from OCTA to new fund; offset by a reimbursement to the Transit Fund for the senior mobility transportation program 50,300 50,300
TOTAL SENIOR MOBILITY TRANSPORTATION FUND 50,300 50,300 - TRANSIT FUND (#310)
70 Adjust bus charter revenues based on Fiscal Year 2024/25 actuals and revenue collected through March 2026 50,000
TOTAL TRANSIT FUND 50,000 - 50,000
DEPOSITS FUND (#510)
71 Additional funds due from third parties for deposit accounts - 16,251 TOTAL DEPOSITS FUND 16,251 - 16,251
GRAND TOTAL - ALL FUNDS 4,479,402 $ (5,762,091) $
14 of 462
FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26
FY 2024/25 Adopted Revised Increase Mid-Year
Object No. Account Title Actual Budget Budget* (Decrease) Budget GENERAL FUND (110/112)
Property Tax
41200/41205 Current Secured $ 44,987,211 $ 47,976,000 $ 47,976,000 $ 100,000 $ 48,076,000 41210 Current Unsecured 1,484,326 1,739,800 1,739,800 (162,210) 1,577,590 41215 Interest & Penalties - Delinquencies 281,036 113,400 113,400 1,300 114,700 41220 Other Property Taxes - 5,000 5,000 - 5,000
41225 Prior Years 399,524 216,000 216,000 114,000 330,000 41230 In Lieu of VLF 4,366,273 4,555,000 4,555,000 48,925 4,603,925 41235 Public Utility 481,157 445,000 445,000 37,000 482,000 41240 Supplemental Apportionment 1,113,374 800,000 800,000 - 800,000 Total Property Taxes 53,112,901 55,850,200 55,850,200 139,015 55,989,215 Other Taxes
41100 Business License Tax 1,179,995 1,100,000 1,100,000 80,000 1,180,000 41300 Sales Tax - Public Safety 472,753 480,000 480,000 - 480,000 41305 Sales Tax - General 6,899,723 6,620,000 6,620,000 (145,665) 6,474,335 41400 TOT-Short Term Lodging 586,768 930,000 930,000 70,000 1,000,000 41410 Transient Occupancy Tax 6,827,938 8,900,000 8,900,000 400,000 9,300,000 41415 TOT-Penalties & Interest - - - 40,000 40,000
41500 Franchise Tax - Cable TV 420,876 510,000 510,000 (115,000) 395,000 41505 Franchise Tax - Electricity 356,423 400,000 400,000 (25,000) 375,000 41510 Franchise Tax - Natural Gas 122,961 120,000 120,000 - 120,000 41515 Franchise Tax - Trash 788,827 300,000 300,000 508,000 808,000 Total Other Taxes 17,656,264 19,360,000 19,360,000 812,335 20,172,335 Licenses and Permits
43000 AB 1379 State Fee 16,656 - - 18,500 18,500
43005 Animal Licenses 40,901 58,000 58,000 - 58,000
43010 Building Permits 2,562,843 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 43015 SB 1473-CBSC (909) 5,000 5,000 2,000 7,000
43020 Strong Motion Impact Program (5,833) - - 3,000 3,000 43025 Plumbing Permits 111,977 130,000 130,000 - 130,000 43030 Electric Permits 179,255 175,000 175,000 - 175,000 43035 Fire Plan Check Permits 27,845 300,000 300,000 (285,000) 15,000 43040 Mechanical Permits 102,443 98,000 98,000 - 98,000 43045 Coastal Development Permits 111,375 70,000 70,000 - 70,000 43050 Public Works Permits 49,500 65,000 65,000 - 65,000 43055 Grading Permits 59,755 30,000 30,000 - 30,000
43060 Temporary Use Permits 16,360 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 43065 Conditional Use Permits 71,149 52,000 52,000 - 52,000 43070 Encroachment Permits 42,475 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 43075 Alarm Permits 28,342 22,000 22,000 20,000 42,000
Total Licenses and Permits 3,414,134 3,545,000 3,545,000 (241,500) 3,303,500 Fines and Penalties
46000 Citations - Code Enforcement 3,472 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 46010 Citations - Water Quality - 1,000 1,000 - 1,000
Total Fines and Penalties 3,472 11,000 11,000 - 11,000
Use of Money and Property
47005 Interest Earnings 3,049,364 3,300,000 3,300,000 - 3,300,000 47006 Investment Market Fluctuation 4,444,093 - - - -
47100 Rent - Anneliese Pre-School at Lang Park 110,275 150,000 150,000 (26,100) 123,900 47105 Rent - Community Center 12,020 10,000 10,000 15,000 25,000 47110 Rent - Festival of Arts 234,492 250,000 250,000 (37,000) 213,000 47115 Lease-Food Pantry 12,000 12,000 12,000 - 12,000
47120 Miscellaneous Rents 49,760 75,000 75,000 - 75,000 47125 Rent - Moulton - 15,000 15,000 (15,000) -
47130 Rent-Veterans Memorial Comm.Center 48,402 46,000 46,000 3,000 49,000 Total Use of Money and Property 7,960,406 3,858,000 3,858,000 (60,100) 3,797,900
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
MAJOR FUNDS
REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
*Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 1 of 5
Attachment 2
14 15 of 462
FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26
FY 2024/25 Adopted Revised Increase Mid-Year
Object No. Account Title Actual Budget Budget* (Decrease) Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
MAJOR FUNDS
REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Intergovernmental
41040 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax 36,245 26,000 26,000 9,145 35,145 41245 Homeowners Property Tax Relief 184,000 176,641 184,000 (15,000) 169,000 45000 Grant Revenue - Federal 560,969 140,000 361,000 - 361,000 45100 Grant Revenue - State 923,555 371,000 992,500 - 992,500 45124 Mutual Aid Contract 314,362 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 45200 Grant Revenue - Local 109,411 80,000 102,055 22,055 124,110 Total Intergovernmental 2,121,183 1,101,000 1,965,555 16,200 1,981,755 Charges for Current Services
42500 Intergovernmental Revenue - 200,000 539,900 - 539,900 44005 Police Accident Reports 11,592 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 44010 Ambulance Revenue 956,729 1,000,000 1,000,000 860,000 1,860,000 44015 Ambulance Service Charges 50 - - - -
44020 Fire Life Inspection Fee 111,629 - 120,000 - 120,000 44030 Animal Services - Laguna Woods 109,666 125,000 125,000 (608) 124,392 44035 Animal Shelter Fees 15,496 10,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 44050 Basic Life Support Fee 810,671 860,000 860,000 (860,000) - 44065 C & D Administration Fees 16,255 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 44075 Design Review 509,975 550,000 550,000 - 550,000
44080 Design Review Appeals 10,000 20,000 20,000 - 20,000 44085 Document Retention Fee 321 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 44090 False Alarm Fees 15,860 30,000 30,000 (10,000) 20,000 44105 Fingerprinting 5,061 5,000 5,000 13,000 18,000
44110 Floor Area Fee - Diamond/Crestview 2,147 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 44140 Landscape Development Fee 64,642 75,000 75,000 - 75,000 44145 Library Impact Fees 200 1,000 1,000 (1,000) -
44150 Lifeguard Services - Private Beaches 245,613 35,000 35,000 65,000 100,000 44165 Marine Safety Beach Classes 140,900 150,000 150,000 - 150,000 44170 Marine Safety Tidepool Tours 210 - - - -
44175 Misc Refuse/Recycling Revenue 181,712 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 44180 Moulton Parkway Fees - - - - -
44185 Other Filing & Permit Fees 175,748 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 44195 Passport to Laguna Tickets 1,983 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 44200 Vehicle Towing & Release Fees 91,390 100,000 100,000 20,000 120,000 44210 Plan Check Fee - Plumbing 5,129 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 44215 Plan Check Fees - Building 1,349,479 1,600,000 1,600,000 - 1,600,000 44220 Plan Check Fees - Zoning 338,010 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 44230 Police Evidence Money 6,924 3,000 3,000 - 3,000
44235 Pool Fees 130,259 165,000 165,000 - 165,000
44240 Pool Passes 39,543 25,000 25,000 - 25,000
44245 Real Property Report 168,290 175,000 175,000 - 175,000 44250 Recreation - Adult Softball 10,800 12,700 12,700 - 12,700 44255 Recreation - Film Permits 114,220 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 44260 Recreation - Misc. Sports Programs 538,793 625,000 625,000 - 625,000 44270 Recreation - Park Weddings 94,502 120,000 120,000 - 120,000 44275 Recreation - Social & Cultural 402,873 525,000 525,000 - 525,000 44280 Recreation - Special Programs 3,510 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 44285 Refuse Service Charges 45,194 - - 5,500 5,500
44290 Returned Check Fee 560 - - 200 200
44295 Sale of Maps, Books & Copying - 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 44310 Special Policing Fees 15,084 5,000 5,000 - 5,000
44315 Subdivision Fees 1,186 15,000 15,000 - 15,000
44325 Use & Occupancy Inspection Fees 30,548 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 44330 Variance 24,472 50,000 50,000 - 50,000
44335 Water Quality Inspection Fees 66,066 150,000 150,000 - 150,000 44340 Weed & Lot Cleaning 23,173 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 *Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 2 of 5
15 16 of 462
FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26
FY 2024/25 Adopted Revised Increase Mid-Year
Object No. Account Title Actual Budget Budget* (Decrease) Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
MAJOR FUNDS
REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
44350 Laguna Beach Tourism & Marketing District 2,784,150 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 48135 Recreation - Miscellaneous Fees 690 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 48135 Community Development-Other Misc. Fees (1,048) 539,000 539,000 - 539,000 Total Current Charges for Services 9,670,257 10,806,700 11,146,600 217,092 11,363,692 Other Revenue
48125 Heritage Committee Events 475 - - - -
48135 Miscellaneous Income 87,720 154,000 154,000 (69,000) 85,000 48145 Police Auction 4,321 5,000 5,000 - 5,000
48150 Sale of Real & Personal Property 3,469,439 1,000 1,000 2,500 3,500 48155 Subpoenas 8,155 10,000 10,000 10,000
48180 Advertising 49,050 30,000 79,050 (30,000) 49,050
Total Other Revenue 3,619,160 200,000 249,050 (96,500) 152,550 Reimbursements & Contributions
48000 Animal Shelter Donations 450 25,000 25,000 (25,000) - 48010 Donations 11,750 50,000 50,000 (43,500) 6,500
48015 Emergency Kit Backpacks 3,579 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 48025 Homeless Meters - 1,000 1,000 (900) 100
48030 Lifeguard Training - SA College - 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 48060 Miscellaneous 33,744 35,000 35,000 30,000 65,000
48070 Other Agencies 49 5,000 5,000 - 5,000
48075 Property Damage - 5,000 5,000 - 5,000
48080 Reimbursements-School District 146,367 45,000 106,100 - 106,100 48085 Workers' Compensation Insurance 132 - - - -
48095 Solid Waste Contractual 7,637 100,000 100,000 (100,000) - 48100 LB School District - School Officer 171,536 181,000 181,000 (11,000) 170,000 48175 CR&R Regulatory Fee 471,203 436,600 436,600 34,600 471,200 Total Reimbursements and Contributions 846,447 895,600 956,700 (115,800) 840,900 Transfers From Other Funds
49118 Transfer from Parking Fund 800,000 525,000 800,000 - 800,000 49174 Transfer from AD 99-5 15 - - - -
49175 Transfer from AD 99-4 110 - - - -
49616 Transfer from Capital Improvement Fund 2,862,500 1,500,000 1,500,000 200,000 1,700,000 Total Transfers from Other Funds 3,387,625 2,300,000 2,300,000 200,000 2,500,000 GENERAL FUND - TOTAL $ 101,791,850 $ 97,927,500 $ 99,242,105 $ 870,742 $ 100,112,847 MEASURE LL FUND (113)
41400 TOT-Short Term Lodging 146,862 $ 271,000 $ 271,000 $ - $ 271,000 $ 41410 Transient Occupancy Tax 2,740,231 3,000,000 3,000,000 150,000 3,150,000 47005 Interest Earnings 43,778 90,000 90,000 - 90,000
MEASURE LL FUND - TOTAL 2,930,871 3,361,000 3,361,000 150,000 3,511,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (116)
41000 Real Property Transfer Tax 717,437 700,000 700,000 - 700,000 41005 Building Construction Tax 124,395 110,000 110,000 - 110,000 41405 Trans Occupancy Tax 6,932,182 6,740,000 6,740,000 (240,000) 6,500,000 44045 Auto Immobilization Fee - 1,000 1,000 - 1,000
45100 Grant Revenue - State 1,225,000 - - - -
46005 Admin Citations-Police 12,241 20,000 20,000 25,000 45,000 46020 Municipal Code Fines-Other 14,153 15,000 15,000 - 15,000 46025 Municipal Code Fines Dmv Holds 135,274 126,000 126,000 9,000 135,000 46030 Municipal Code Fines-Parking 961,514 575,000 575,000 425,000 1,000,000 46035 Vehicle Code Fines 4,041 150,000 150,000 (145,000) 5,000 47005 Interest Earnings 1,981 - - - -
*Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 3 of 5
16 17 of 462
FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26
FY 2024/25 Adopted Revised Increase Mid-Year
Object No. Account Title Actual Budget Budget* (Decrease) Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
MAJOR FUNDS
REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
49110 Transfer from General Fund - - 150,000 - 150,000
49141 Transfer from Wildfire Safety & Fire Mitigation Fund - - 739,000 - 739,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND - TOTAL 10,128,218 8,437,000 9,326,000 74,000 9,400,000 PARKING FUND (118/618)
42xxx Parking Meter Zones 6,174,187 6,073,200 6,073,200 426,800 6,500,000 42xxx Parking Lot Meters & Fees 3,304,354 3,505,100 3,505,100 200,000 3,705,100 42115 Parking Permits 998,709 412,000 412,000 - 412,000 44345 Electric Vehicle Charging Station 52,053 25,700 25,700 55,000 80,700 47120 Miscellaneous Rents 216,290 206,000 206,000 - 206,000 48020 Festival Parking Plan Reimbursement 38,004 51,500 51,500 - 51,500 48060 Reimburse Miscellaneous 1,667 - - - -
48135 Miscellaneous Income (401) 350,000 350,000 (350,000) - 48140 Parking Meter Bag 100,485 77,200 77,200 - 77,200
PARKING FUND - TOTAL 10,885,348 10,700,700 10,700,700 331,800 11,032,500 GAS TAX FUND (132/632)
41015 Gasoline Tax - Section 2105 142,821 146,300 146,300 1,405 147,705 41020 Gasoline Tax - Section 2106 96,891 97,600 97,600 1,420 99,020 41025 Gasoline Tax - Section 2107 189,464 199,700 199,700 (2,290) 197,410 41030 Gasoline Tax - Section 2107.5 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 41035 Gasoline Tax - Section 2103 219,613 209,200 209,200 11,100 220,300 41036 Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) 627,322 603,100 603,100 (603,100) - 41310 Sales Tax - Measure M 586,303 615,800 615,800 (615,800) - 47005 Investment Earnings 117,955 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 49202 Transfer from Measure M Fund - - 615,800 - 615,800 49616 Transfer from Capital Improvement Fund 700,000 - - - - GAS TAX FUND - TOTAL 2,685,369 1,926,700 1,926,700 (591,465) 1,335,235 STREET LIGHTING & UTILITY FUND (134/634)
41200/41205 Current Secured 1,543,349 1,605,800 1,605,800 23,200 1,629,000 41210 Current Unsecured 50,523 51,000 51,000 - 51,000
41215 Interest & Penalties 3,414 2,100 2,100 - 2,100
41220 Other Property Taxes 732,791 729,600 729,600 20,400 750,000 41225 Prior Years 13,611 7,300 7,300 - 7,300
41235 Public Utility 16,476 20,800 20,800 - 20,800
41240 Supplemental Apportionment 37,979 20,800 20,800 - 20,800 41245 Homeowners Property Tax Relief 6,300 6,025 6,300 - 6,300 47005 Investment Earnings 190,016 150,000 150,000 - 150,000 STREET LIGHTING & UTILITY FUND TOTAL 2,594,184 2,593,700 2,593,700 43,600 2,637,300 WASTEWATER FUND (137/637)
44305/41200 Wastewater Service Charges 10,983,747 11,912,600 11,912,600 (599,600) 11,313,000 44300 Wastewater Connection Charges 102,329 110,000 110,000 - 110,000 47005 Investment Earnings 536,180 100,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 45000 Hazard Mitigation Grant-Irvine Cove - - - - -
48060 Reimburse Miscellaneous 676,663 - 676,665 - 676,665 48065 North Coast Interceptor - 60,000 60,000 - 60,000
48135 Miscellaneous Income 34,143 - - -
48160 Loan Proceeds - 1,500,000 1,500,000 (1,500,000) - WASTEWATER FUND - TOTAL 12,333,062 13,682,600 13,682,600 (1,322,935) 12,359,665 *Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 4 of 5
17 18 of 462
FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26
FY 2024/25 Adopted Revised Increase Mid-Year
Object No. Account Title Actual Budget Budget* (Decrease) Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
MAJOR FUNDS
REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
TRANSIT FUND (310)
41010 Transportation Tax - Operating 1,433,700 1,496,000 1,496,000 - 1,496,000 42135 Lot 16 - Act V Parking 109,843 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 44060 Bus Charter Fees 115,352 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 45000 Grant Revenue - Federal 410,105 854,000 854,000 - 854,000 45100 Grant Revenue - State 460,362 34,900 34,900 - 34,900 45200 Grant Revenue - Local 120,634 1,214,300 2,935,690 (50,300) 2,885,390 47005 Interest Earnings 15,547 - - - -
47120 Miscellaneous Rents 415 - - - -
49118 Transfer from Parking Fund 3,673,480 4,940,100 4,940,100 - 4,940,100 49203 Transfer from Senior Mobility Transportation Fund - - - 50,300 50,300 TRANSIT FUND - TOTAL 6,339,438 8,689,300 10,410,690 50,000 10,460,690 TOTAL MAJOR FUNDS $ 147,318,500 149,688,340 $ 151,243,495 $ (394,258) $ 150,849,237 $ *Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 5 of 5
18 19 of 462
ORG No. Description
FY 2024/25
Actual
FY 2025/26
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025/26
Revised
Budget*
Increase
(Decrease)
FY 2025/26
Mid-Year
Budget
GENERAL FUND (#110/112)
General Government
1101101 City Council 124,983 $ 94,700 $ 94,700 $ - $ 94,700 $ 1101301 City Clerk 585,428 540,200 588,200 112,000 700,200 1101401 City Treasurer 264,738 329,900 329,900 - 329,900 1101501 City Attorney 2,407,337 1,876,400 1,876,400 - 1,876,400 Total General Government 3,382,486 2,841,200 2,889,200 112,000 3,001,200 City Manager
1101201 City Manager Administration 2,526,079 2,219,600 2,219,600 (15,000) 2,204,600 1101202 Special Projects 551,607 510,000 560,000 - 560,000 1101204 Communications 415,896 581,700 581,700 - 581,700 1101205 Information Technology 5,889,647 6,229,600 7,252,250 51,635 7,303,885 1101270 Cultural Arts 382,683 411,100 411,100 - 411,100 1101275 Laguna Beach Tourism & Marketing District 3,002,834 3,000,000 4,053,900 (510,000) 3,543,900 Total City Manager 12,768,746 12,952,000 15,078,550 (473,365) 14,605,185 Administrative Services
1101601 Human Resources 1,865,449 1,782,800 1,954,600 - 1,954,600 1101701 Finance 2,348,290 2,810,300 2,882,300 84,000 2,966,300 1101781 Non-Departmental 490,863 (341,600) (252,850) 30,000 (222,850) Total Administrative Services 4,704,602 4,251,500 4,584,050 114,000 4,698,050 Police
1102101 Police Support Services 7,129,852 7,846,000 7,825,050 20,000 7,845,050 1102102 Police Field Services 14,600,360 15,526,100 15,861,600 - 15,861,600 1102104 Police Investigative Services 2,627,534 - - - - 1102120 Animal Services 1,024,383 1,046,100 1,046,100 - 1,046,100 Total Police 25,382,129 24,418,200 24,732,750 24,752,750 20,000 Fire
1102401 Fire Operations 16,796,929 15,837,709 16,034,078 - 16,034,078 1102402 Fire Ambulance 1,850,999 1,877,325 2,036,111 - 2,036,111 1102405 Fire Emergency Operations 103,456 353,400 353,400 - 353,400 1102406 Fire Prevention 1,657,867 1,139,716 1,470,716 - 1,470,716 Total Fire 20,409,251 19,208,150 19,894,305 - 19,894,305 Marine Safety
1102601 Marine Safety 4,387,651 4,700,150 4,741,850 - 4,741,850
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
OPERATING EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS OUT BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
MAJOR FUNDS
*= Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 1 of 4
Attachment 3
19 20 of 462
ORG No. Description
FY 2024/25
Actual
FY 2025/26
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025/26
Revised
Budget*
Increase
(Decrease)
FY 2025/26
Mid-Year
Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
OPERATING EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS OUT BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
MAJOR FUNDS
Public Works
1103100 Public Works Administration 619,617 680,680 680,680 - 680,680 1103102 Engineering 1,593,974 1,780,200 1,780,200 - 1,780,200 1103104 Fleet Maintenance 916,515 693,420 693,420 - 693,420 1103106 Buildings & Facilities 3,588,623 3,587,780 3,589,780 - 3,589,780 1103108 Street Maintenance 3,135,577 3,637,900 3,637,900 - 3,637,900 1103110 Utility Undergrounding 166,707 360,300 360,300 - 360,300 1103112 Landscape Maintenance 2,623,667 3,052,370 3,199,370 - 3,199,370 1103120 Solid Waste 367,249 749,000 2,642,100 - 2,642,100 1103125 Homeless Program 57,878 - - - -
1103136 Water Quality 517,968 673,100 673,100 - 673,100 Total Public Works 13,587,775 15,214,750 17,256,850 17,256,850 - Transit & Community Services
1103602 Recreation & Social Services 1,786,731 2,449,400 2,510,500 2,510,500 - 1103604 Community Assistance 255,387 236,000 239,600 - 239,600 1103605 Swimming Pool Division 506,271 700,400 700,400 - 700,400 Total Transit & Community Services 2,548,389 3,385,800 3,450,500 3,450,500 - Community Development
1104101 Community Development Administration 1,176,622 2,232,700 2,237,700 (112,000) 2,125,700 1104102 Zoning 1,677,152 - - - -
1104103 Code Enforcement 757,437 962,600 962,600 - 962,600 1104104 Building Safety 3,233,957 3,823,500 3,823,500 3,823,500 - 1104106 Planning 2,325,163 4,214,100 4,754,050 4,754,050 - Total Community Development 9,170,331 11,232,900 11,777,850 (112,000) 11,665,850 Transfers Out
59111 To Library Impact Fees Fund 83,680 - - - -
59128 To Vehicle Replacement Fund 1,000,000 - - - -
59142 To Animal Shelter Donations Fund 1,497,850 - - - - 59143 To Air Quality Management District Fund 84,038 - - - - 59146 To Housing Fund 500,000 - - - -
59149 To Cultural Environmental Stewardship Fund - - 510,000 - 510,000 59616 To Capital Improvement Fund 2,550,000 - 150,000 - 150,000 Total Transfers Out 5,715,568 - 150,000 510,000 660,000 GENERAL FUND - TOTAL $ 102,056,928 $ 98,204,650 $ 104,555,905 $ 170,635 $ 104,726,540 *= Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 2 of 4
20 21 of 462
ORG No. Description
FY 2024/25
Actual
FY 2025/26
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025/26
Revised
Budget*
Increase
(Decrease)
FY 2025/26
Mid-Year
Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
OPERATING EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS OUT BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
MAJOR FUNDS
MEASURE LL FUND (#113)
1131205 Information Technology $ 124,592 $ 199,000 $ 199,000 $ - $ 199,000 1131701 Finance 102,947 289,600 289,600 - 289,600
1132102 Police Support Services 1,491,458 1,845,900 1,845,900 1,845,900 - 1132401 Fire Operations 352,534 549,900 549,900 - 549,900 1132406 Fire Prevention 320,628 299,500 299,500 - 299,500 1132601 Marine Safety 482,782 427,700 427,700 - 427,700 1133106 Building & Facilities 146,448 73,000 120,000 - 120,000 1133108 Street Maintenance 343,879 365,800 365,800 - 365,800 1133110 Utility Undergrounding (71,488) - - - -
MEASURE LL FUND - TOTAL 3,293,780 4,050,400 4,097,400 4,097,400 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (#116)
1163102 Engineering 1,710 83,700 83,700 - 83,700
59110 Transfer to General Fund 2,600,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 200,000 1,700,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND - TOTAL 1,583,700 2,601,710 1,583,700 200,000 1,783,700 PARKING FUND (#118)
1181701 Finance - - - 15,000 15,000
1182104 Police Investigative Services 22,100 - - - -
1182121 Parking Enforcement 1,039,849 1,411,400 1,411,400 1,411,400 - 1182130 Neighborhood Enhancement Team 433,663 456,100 456,100 - 456,100 1182601 Marine Safety 462,275 486,400 486,400 - 486,400 1183151 Parking Management/Operations 214,770 604,100 604,100 - 604,100 1183152 Neighborhood Services 275,000 275,000 275,000 - 275,000 1183657 Parking & Sign Maintenance 2,953,982 3,355,200 3,670,600 3,670,600 - 1183658 Parking Management/Operations 224,196 15,700 15,700 - 15,700 59110 Transfer to General Fund 525,000 800,000 800,000 - 800,000 59126 Transfer to Insurance and Benefits Fund - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 59128 Transfer to Vehicle Replacement Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 59140 Transfer to Disaster Contingency Fund - - 115,905 - 115,905 59310 Transfer to Transit Fund 3,673,480 4,940,100 4,940,100 4,940,100 - PARKING FUND - TOTAL 10,124,315 12,644,000 12,959,400 1,130,905 14,090,305 GAS TAX FUND (132)
59202 Transfer to RMRA Fund - - 1,058,721 - 1,058,721
GAS TAX FUND - TOTAL - - 1,058,721 - 1,058,721
*= Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 3 of 4
21 22 of 462
ORG No. Description
FY 2024/25
Actual
FY 2025/26
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025/26
Revised
Budget*
Increase
(Decrease)
FY 2025/26
Mid-Year
Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
OPERATING EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS OUT BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
MAJOR FUNDS
STREET LIGHTING & UTILITY FUND (134)
1341701 Finance - Assessment Loan Program - - - 200,000 200,000 1343150 Utility Undergrounding 1,034,677 909,700 909,700 - 909,700 59141
Transfer to Wildfire Mitigation and Fire Safety
Fund 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
59853
Transfer to AD 21-1 West Street
Undergrounding - - 578,200 - 578,200
STREET LIGHTING & UTILITY FUND - TOTAL 2,034,677 2,909,700 3,487,900 200,000 3,687,900 WASTEWATER FUND (137)
1371781 Non-Departmental 11,384 - - - -
1373132 Sewer Operations 5,044,998 8,243,400 8,732,800 - 8,732,800 1373134 North Coast Interceptor 338,737 426,100 426,100 - 426,100 WASTEWATER FUND - TOTAL 5,395,119 8,669,500 9,158,900 - 9,158,900 TRANSIT FUND (310)
3101781 Non-Departmental 298,164 - - - -
3103651 Transit Administration 107,068 628,088 678,088 - 678,088 3103652 Transit Maintenance 294,169 837,100 837,100 - 837,100 3103653 Transit Festival Operations 1,520,225 - - - -
3103654 Transit Neighborhood On Demand 2,232,284 3,722,894 3,977,994 - 3,977,994 3103655 Trolley-Off Season Weekend' 1,162,685 3,501,218 3,614,768 - 3,614,768 TRANIST FUND - TOTAL 5,614,595 8,689,300 9,107,950 9,107,950 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS OUT 131,121,124 $ $ 136,751,250 $ 144,951,155 $ 2,760,261 $ 147,711,416 *= Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 4 of 4
22 23 of 462
Adopted Revised Mid-Year
Fund Actuals Budget Budget Increase Budget
No. Fund Name 2024-25 2025-26 2025-26* (Decrease) 2025-26 REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN:
111 Library Impact Fees 83,680 $ - $ $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000 114/614 Open Space Fund 29,874 - - - -
119 Transportation Infrastructure 51,788 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 123 Art In-Lieu Fees 131,331 - - 45,000 45,000
124 Drainage Fees 2,306 - - - -
126 Insurance & Benefits Fund 14,831,611 17,151,600 17,151,600 1,200,000 18,351,600 127 Housing in Lieu Fees 21,622 - - - -
128 Vehicle Replacement Fund 2,611,799 2,796,800 2,796,800 170,000 2,966,800 135 Federal Asset Forfeiture Fund 5,043 - - 25,500 25,500 136/636 South Laguna Fund 1,295,681 1,545,000 1,545,000 35,000 1,580,000 138 State Asset Forfeiture Fund 50,439 - - 1,000 1,000
140 Disaster Contingency Fund 192,310 150,000 150,000 115,905 265,905 141/641 Wildfire Mitigation & Fire Safety Fund 1,000,000 5,002,451 5,002,451 41,788 5,044,239 142 Animal Shelter Donations Fund 1,497,850 - - 25,000 25,000 143 Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Fund 84,038 - - 30,000 30,000 146 Housing Fund 581,637 65,000 65,000 49,000 114,000
148 National Opiods Settlement 56,914 - - - -
149 Cultural Environmental Stewardship Fund 260,000 - - 750,000 750,000 201/601 Measure M Fund - - - 615,800 615,800
202/602 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Fund
- - - 1,702,116 1,702,116
203 Senior Mobility Transportation Fund - - - 50,300 50,300 510 Deposits Fund 1,508 - - 16,251 16,251
REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN - TOTAL $ 22,789,432 $ 26,740,851 $ 26,740,851 $ 4,873,660 $ 31,614,511 EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS OUT:
114/614 Open Space Fund 49,591 $ - $ $ - $ - $ -
119 Transportation Infrastructure - 1,908,201 1,908,201 41,788 1,949,989 122 Park In-Lieu Fees 86,600 - - - -
123 Art In-Lieu Fees 24,312 - 155,605 - 155,605
126 Insurance & Benefits Fund 19,185,768 15,525,000 15,525,000 200,000 15,725,000 127 Housing in Lieu Fees - - 23,900 - 23,900
128 Vehicle Replacement Fund 1,319,499 1,490,800 6,244,000 40,000 6,284,000 135 Federal Asset Forfeiture Fund 50,439 - - 100,000 100,000 136/636 South Laguna Fund 4,313,317 4,377,300 4,377,300 25,000 4,402,300 140 Disaster Contingency Fund - - 115,905 - 115,905
141/641 Wildfire Mitigation & Fire Safety Fund 686,568 2,497,050 7,320,782 10,000 7,330,782 142 Animal Shelter Donations Fund - - 1,497,850 (1,497,850) - 146 Housing Fund 25,684 20,000 501,700 - 501,700
149 Cultural Environmental Stewardship Fund - - 410,128 - 410,128 201/601 Measure M Fund - - - 615,800 615,800
203 Senior Mobility Transportation Fund - - - 50,300 50,300 EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS OUT - TOTAL $ 25,741,778 $ 25,818,351 $ 38,080,371 $ (414,962) $ 37,665,409
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
OTHER FUNDS
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
* Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026.
Attachment 4
23 24 of 462
Project No. Description
FY 2025/26
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025/26
Revised Budget*
Increase
(Decrease)
FY 2025/26
Mid-Year
Budget
Capital Improvement Fund (616)
C1705 Coast Hwy Sidewalk Gap Closures $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 C1708 Storm Drain Bolsa Way St Anns - 271,473 - 271,473 C1710 Capital Equipment, Furniture and Fixture Replacement 396,884 300,000 396,884 - C1904 Future City Facilities Funding - 2,329,656 - 2,329,656 C2101 Caltrans Project 2 Add Upgrade - 686,125 - 686,125 C2102 Jahraus Park Renovations - 348,544 - 348,544
C2104 Sidewalk Master Plan - 96,754 - 96,754
C2107 Cleo Beach Access Improvements - 2,413,745 - 2,413,745 C2115 Downtown Action Plan Improvements 1,500,000 1,674,014 - 1,674,014 C2208 Fire Station 4 Replacement - 9,386,737 - 9,386,737 C2301 Village Green Park Playground Renovation - 558,841 - 558,841 C2313 Sleepy Hollow Beach Access Improvement - 9,946 - 9,946 C2314 St Anns Drive Retaining Wall - 14,034 - 14,034
C2317 Forest Promenade Permanent Conversion 1,000,000 7,835,067 - 7,835,067 C2403 Anita St Beach Stairs Replace - 355,775 - 355,775 C2407 Wendt Terr Retain Wall Repairs - 107,344 - 107,344 C2408 Diver Cove Bch Access Improvements - 150,000 - 150,000 C2413 Glenneyre St Lighting Improvements - 43,860 - 43,860 C2417 Police Department Facility Improvements 250,000 335,983 - 335,983 C2418 Bluebird Canyon Dr Tree Evaluations - 38,276 - 38,276 C2501 Storm Drain Master Plan Update - 368,500 - 368,500 C2503 CRC Generator Transfer Switch - 100,000 - 100,000 C2504 Police Department Cabling Improvements - 61,357 - 61,357 C2507 Fire Station 2 Emergency Generator - 300,000 - 300,000 C2509 Police Department 2nd Floor Expansion 150,000 183,396 - 183,396 C2510 Dog Park Slope Stabilization - 100,000 - 100,000
C2511 Enclosed Lifeguard Tower Installation 500,000 707,796 - 707,796 C2517 Facility Master Plan - 131,900 - 131,900
C2601 City Hall Elevator Renovation 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 C2602 Hagan Place Stairs and Susie Q Trellis Replacement 500,000 500,000 - 500,000 C2603 EOC Relocation 250,000 1,139,000 - 1,139,000
C2604 CRC Fitness Center 200,000 200,000 - 200,000
C2605 Fire Station Communication System Upgrades 500,000 500,000 500,000 - C2606 Coast Highway Landscape Upgrades 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 C2607 Fisherman's Cove Beach Access Improvements 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 C2612 Library Capital Improvement Plan - 750,000 - 750,000 CPY01 Electric Vehicle & Charging Station MP - 18,832 - 18,832 CPY02 Solar Panels Assessment - 25,000 - 25,000
CPY07 Laguna Canyon Road Improvement - 208,256 - 208,256 CPY10 CALTRANS project 1 Add. Upgrade - 235,712 - 235,712 Capital Improvement Fund (616) - Total 6,700,000 35,132,807 - 35,132,807
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) EXPENDITURES
* = Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 1 of 3 Attachment 5
24 25 of 462
Project No. Description
FY 2025/26
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025/26
Revised Budget*
Increase
(Decrease)
FY 2025/26
Mid-Year
Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) EXPENDITURES
Parking Fund (618)
C1704 Citywide Parking Lot Rehabilitations - 46,335 - 46,335 C2113 Downtown Parking Structure Study - 339,201 339,201 - C2201 Parking Pay Station Installations 350,000 1,034,311 1,034,311 - C2216 Future Parking Facilities and Mobility Improvements 1,000,000 4,995,500 4,995,500 - C2311 Glenneyre Parking Structure Repair - 191,198 191,198 - C2425* Aliso Beach Parking Lot 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 - C2512 Laguna Beach CRC Parking Lot Gates 294,617 - - 294,617 C2608 Glenneyre Parking Structure Striping 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 Parking Fund (618) - Total 3,100,000 8,651,162 - 8,651,162 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) (602) C2609 Zone 7 Street Slurry Seal/Rehabilitation - - 1,700,000 1,700,000 RMRA Fund (602) - Total - - 1,700,000 1,700,000
Gas Tax Fund (632)
C2609 Zone 7 Street Slurry Seal/Rehabilitation 1,700,000 1,700,000 (1,700,000) - C2217 Zone 4 Downtown St Resurface - 537,107 537,107 -
C2423 Zone 7 Sidewalk Repairs - 100,000 100,000 -
C2427 Zone 6 St Slurry Seal 1,550,000 - 1,550,000 -
C2610 Annual Concrete Repairs 200,000 200,000 200,000 - CPY21 Zone 4 Street Concrete Rehabilitation - 71,209 - 71,209 Gas Tax Fund (632) - Total 1,900,000 4,158,316 (1,700,000) 2,458,316 Street Lighting & Utility Fund (634)
C2109 Bluebird UD 2020 2 - 62,024 - 62,024
C2118 Coast Hwy UD 2020 1 2,780,127 - 2,780,127 -
CPY23 Coast Hwy Ornamental St Lights 1,942,800 - 1,942,800 - Street Lighting & Utility Fund (634) - Total 4,784,951 - 4,784,951 - South Laguna Fund (636)
C2428 Aliso Beach Parking Lot Rehabilitation - 521,851 75,000 596,851 South Laguna Fund (636) - 521,851 75,000 596,851
Wastewater Fund (637)
C1807 Anita St Lift Station Reconstruction 308,188 - - 308,188 C2429 Victoria II Lift Station Rehabilitation 870,312 - - 870,312 C2431 Manhole Inspection 381,606 - - 381,606
C2432 Main Beach Lift Station Improvements 150,000 - - 150,000 C2433 Sewer Facility and Equipment Upgrade 98,090 - (98,090) - C2514 Sleepy Hollow Lane Sewer Replacement 47,795 - - 47,795 C2515 Crescent Bay Lift Station Reconstruction 250,000 - (250,000) - C2611
Top of the World Rehabilitation and Generator
Replacement 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
* = Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 2 of 3 25 26 of 462
Project No. Description
FY 2025/26
Adopted
Budget
FY 2025/26
Revised Budget*
Increase
(Decrease)
FY 2025/26
Mid-Year
Budget
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) EXPENDITURES
C2220 Bluebird Lift Station Replacement 2,700,000 3,112,252 - 3,112,252 C2429 Victoria II Lift Station Renovation 1,600,000 1,600,000 - 1,600,000 C2434 SOCWA WWTP Projects 1,000,000 11,133,935 (7,000,000) 4,133,935 CPY24 Main Beach Lift Station - 61,800 (61,800) -
CPY27 Force Main Inspection - 257,500 (257,500) -
CPY28 Siphon Inspections - 515,000 (515,000) -
CPY31 Bluebird SOCWA Valve Replacement - 100,000 - 100,000 CPY32 NCI Reach 5 Replacement 9,000,000 9,129,998 - 9,129,998 CPY33 ACL/NCI Improvements - 24,200 - 24,200
Wastewater Fund (637) - Total 16,300,000 30,040,676 (8,182,390) 21,858,286 CIP EXPENDITURES - TOTAL $ 28,000,000 $ 83,289,763 $ (8,107,390) $ 75,182,373 Note:
(1) - This funding will be used for solar panels.
* = Revised Budget is as of March 31, 2026. Page 3 of 3 26 27 of 462
Projected
Beginning Operating CIP Transfers Transfers Ending
Balance Revenues Expenditures Expenditures In Out Balance 7/1/2025(1) FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 Adjustments 6/30/2026 General Fund (#110/112)
Unassigned/Available for Appropriations $ 863,838 $ 97,612,847 $ (98,981,790) $ 2,300,000 - $ $ (660,000) $ (1,000,000) $ 134,895 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 5,084,750 (5,084,750) - - - - - - Restricted -Contributions for Specific Purpose 49,417 - - - - - - 49,417Non-Spendable-Inventory 100,372 - - - - - - 100,372 Non-Spendable-Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment (1,443,735) - - - - - - (1,443,735)Reserve - Contingency (20%)(2) - 17,300,000 - 200,000 - - 1,000,000 18,500,000 Total General Fund 21,954,642 97,612,847 (104,066,540) - 2,500,000 (660,000) - 17,340,949 Library Impact Fees Fund (#111)
Committed for Library Operations and Improvements 83,680 1,000 - - - - - 84,680 Measure LL Fund (#113)
Unassigned/Available for Appropriations 1,742,692 3,511,000 (4,097,400) - - - - 1,156,292 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 47,000 - - - - - - 47,000 Non-Spendable-Prepaids 338,620 - - - - - - 338,620
Total Measure LL Fund 2,128,312 3,511,000 (4,097,400) - - - - 1,541,912 Open Space Fund (#114)
Unassigned/Available for Appropriations 986,044 - - - - - - 986,044 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 100,000 - - - - - - 100,000 Total Open Space Fund 1,086,044 - - - - - - 1,086,044
Capital Improvement Fund (#116/616)
Unassigned/Available for Appropriations 9,298,699 8,511,000 (83,700) (8,359,000) 889,000 (1,700,000) - 8,555,999 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 26,773,807 - - (26,773,807) - - - - Total Capital Improvement Fund 36,072,506 8,511,000 (83,700) (35,132,807) 889,000 (1,700,000) - 8,555,999Parking Authority Fund (#118/618) Unassigned/Available for Appropriations 8,867,357 11,032,500 (6,618,900) (3,100,000) (7,156,005) - - 3,024,952 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 5,866,562 - (315,400) (5,551,162) - - - - Total Parking Authority Fund 14,733,919 11,032,500 (6,934,300) (8,651,162) - (7,156,005) - 3,024,952 Transportation Infrastructure Fund (#119)
Assigned-Transportation Infrastructure Projects 1,919,989 30,000 - - (1,949,989) - - - Parking In-Lieu Fees Fund (#120)
Committed for Parking Projects 1,038 - - - - - - 1,038
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
FUND BALANCES BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Attachment 5
27 Projected
Beginning Operating CIP Transfers Transfers Ending
Balance Revenues Expenditures Expenditures In Out Balance 7/1/2025(1) FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 Adjustments 6/30/2026
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
FUND BALANCES BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Park In-Lieu Fees Fund (#122)
Committed for Park and Recreation Facilities 47,058 - - - - - - 47,058 Art In-Lieu Fees Fund (#123)
Committed for Art in Public Places 385,809 45,000 (38,605) - - - - 392,204 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 117,000 - (117,000) - - - - - Total Art In-Lieu Fees Fund 502,809 45,000 (155,605) - - - - 392,204 Drainage Fees Fund (#124)
Committed for Drainage projects 85,497 - - - - - - 85,497 Housing In-Lieu Fees Fund (#127)
Committed for Affordable Housing 777,712 - (23,900) - - - - 753,812 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 23,900 - - - - - - 23,900 Total Housing in Lieu Fees Fund 801,612 - (23,900) - - - - 777,712 Gas Tax Fund (#132/632)
Restricted-Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance 3,148,908 719,435 - (2,458,316) 615,800 (1,058,721) - 967,106 Street Lighting & Utility Fund (#134/634)
Restricted for Street Lighting Projects 1,697,905 2,637,300 (1,687,900) - - (2,000,000) - 647,305Restricted for Street Lighting Project Carryovers 4,784,951 - - (4,784,951) - - - - Non-Spendable-Prepaids 2,388,177 - - - - - - 2,388,177
Total Street Lighting & Utility Fund 8,871,033 2,637,300 (1,687,900) (4,784,951) - (2,000,000) - 3,035,482 Federal Asset Forfeiture Fund (#135)
Restricted for Public Safety Programs 138,211 25,500 (100,000) - - - 63,711 South Laguna Fund (#136/636)
Restricted for South Laguna 14,878,007 1,580,000 (4,402,300) (75,000) - - - 11,980,707 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 521,851 - - (521,851) - - - - Total South Laguna Fund 15,399,858 1,580,000 (4,402,300) (596,851) - - - 11,980,707 State Asset Forfeiture Fund (#138)
Restricted for Public Safety Programs 50,439 1,000 - - - - - 51,439 Disaster Contingency Fund (#140)
Committed for Disaster Contingency 7,129,626 150,000 (115,905) - 115,905 - - 7,279,626
28 dcteejPro
Beginning Operating CIP Transfers ransfersT Ending
Balance Revenues xpendituresE xpendituresE nI Out Balance 7/1/2025(1) FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 Adjustments 6/30/2026
ACHECITY OF LAGUNA B
FUND BALANCES BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Wildfire Mitigation and Fire Safety Fund (#141/641)
Unassigned - Available for Appropriations 3,722,593 1,094,250 (6,241,882) 3,949,989 - (739,000) - 1,785,950 Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 349,900 - (349,900) - - - - - Nonspendable-Prepaids 1,777,215 - - - - - - 1,777,215
Total Wildfire Mitigation and Fire Safety Fund 5,849,708 1,094,250 (6,591,782) 3,949,989 - (739,000) - 3,563,165 Animal Shelter Donations Fund (#142)
Restricted-Animal Shelter 1,497,850 25,000 - - - - - 1,522,850 Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Fund (#143)
Restricted-Mobile Source Emissions Reduction Programs 84,038 30,000 - - - - - 114,038 Housing Fund (#146)
Restricted-Affordable Housing Programs 1,766,700 114,000 (501,700) - - - - 1,379,000 National Opioid Settlement Fund (#148)
Restricted-Opioid Abatement Programs 76,819 - - - - - - 76,819 Cultural Environmental Stewardship Fund (#149)
Restricted-Cultural Environmental Stewardship Programs 260,000 240,000 (410,128) 510,000 - - - 599,872 Solid Waste Fund (#200)
Restricted-Solid Waste Programs - - - - - - - -
Measure M Fund (#201/601)
Restricted-Streets and Roads Capital Projects - 615,800 - - (615,800) - - - Road Maintnancee and Rehabilitation Accunto
(RMRA) Fund (#202/602)
Restricted-Streets and Roads Capital Projects - 643,395 (1,700,000) - 1,058,721 - - 2,116 Senior Mobility Transportation Fund (#203)
Restricted-Senior Mobility Program - 50,300 - - - (50,300) - - Deposits Fund (#550)
Assigned-Funded by Third Parties 16,251)( 16,251 - - - - - - Wastewater Fund (#137/637)
Unrestricted Net Position - Available for Appropriation (3) 12,359,665 (2,576,416) (9,158,900) (8,117,610) - - - (7,493,261) Assigned - Continuing Appropriations (Carryovers) 13,740,676 - (13,740,676) - - - - - Noncurrent Liabilities (786,758) - - - - - - (786,758)
Non-Spendable-Investment in Capital Assets 39,765,829 - - - - - - 39,765,829 Total Wastewater Fund 50,143,331 12,359,665 (9,158,900) (21,858,286) - - 31,485,810 -
29 Projected
Beginning Operating CIP Transfers Transfers Ending
Balance Revenues Expenditures Expenditures In Out Balance 7/1/2025(1) FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 FY 2025/26 Adjustments 6/30/2026
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
FUND BALANCES BY FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Transit Fund (#310)
Unrestricted Net Position - Available for Appropriation 59,531 5,470,290 (9,107,950) - 4,990,400 - - 1,412,271 Non-Spendable-Noncurrent Receivables 1,650,000 - - - - - - 1,650,000Non-Spendable-Investment in Capital Assets 1,105,726 - - - - - - 1,105,726Total Transit Fund 2,815,257 5,470,290 (9,107,950) - 4,990,400 - - 4,167,997 Insurance and Benefits Fund (#126)
Unrestricted Net Position-Available for Appropriation (6,634,993) 17,351,600 (15,725,000) - 1,000,000 - - (4,008,393) Non-Spendable-Notes Receivable 940,590 - - - - - - 940,590 Non-Spendable-Property Held for Investment 797,500 - - - - - - 797,500 Total Employee Benefits Fund (4,896,903) 17,351,600 (15,725,000) - 1,000,000 - - (2,270,303) Vehicle Replacement Fund (#128)
Unrestricted Net Position - Available 14,310,027 2,666,800 (6,284,000) - 300,000 - - 10,992,827 Non-Spendable-Notes Receivable 859,555 - - - - - - 859,555 Non-Spendable-Investment in Capital Assets 6,622,379 - - - - - - 6,622,379 Total Fleet Maintenance Fund 21,791,961 2,666,800 (6,284,000) - 300,000 - - 18,474,761 ALL FUNDS - TOTAL $ 193,527,691 $ 166,533,933 $ (169,447,010) $ (75,182,373) $ 15,929,815 $ (15,929,815) $ - $ 115,432,241 Notes:(1) - Per audited financial statements as of June 30, 2025.(2) - Set aside with City Council adoption of Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget on June 24, 2025.(3) - The City funds Wastewater capital projects with I-Bank loans.
30 Calculation of General Fund Contingency Reserve
General Fund Categories Calculation
Total General Fund Expenditure Appropriations $104,726,540 Less: Fiscal Year 2025/26 Carryovers (5,084,750)
Less: Special Programs (1,755,200)
Less: Grant Funded Programs (768,700)
Less: One-Time Capital Outlay (2,502,400)
Less: LBMTD (3,000,000)
Total General Fund Expenditure Appropriations
Subject to Reserve $91,615,490
FY 2025-26 General Fund Contingency Reserve Target $18,323,098 20% Target Rounded to Nearest $1000 $18,300,000
Attachment 7
31 32 of 462
RESOLUTION NO. 26.XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PAY
RANGES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES; AND FINDING THE
ACTION IS NOT A PROJECT WITHIN THE MEANING OF
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to update the Classification Title and Range Assignment and remaining salary schedules to accurately reflect the job positions that are currently budgeted and held by management, sworn employees, and all other staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby ratifies the Classification Title and Range Assignment and salary schedules reflected in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) that the action consists of the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and therefore does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the CEQA. (Public Resources Code Section 21065; 14 CCR Section 15378(b)(4).) Here, the changes to the classification title and range assignment and salary schedules is a government fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is therefore not a project within the meaning of CEQA.
Attachment 8
32 33 of 462
-2- Reso. #26.XXX
ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026.
Mark Orgill, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ann Marie McKay, City Clerk
I, Ann Marie McKay, City Clerk of the City of Laguna Beach, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26.XXX was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on April 14, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk, City of Laguna Beach, California
33 34 of 462
City Manager Firefighter's Association
Management Municipal Employee's Association
Police & Fire Management Association Police Employee's Association Classification Salary Range
Accountant MISC 106
Accounting Manager MGMT 2030
Accounting Supervisor5 MISC 128
Accounting Technician MISC 96
Administrative Analyst4,5 MISC 96
Administrative Assistant 1,4 MISC 88
Ambulance Program Coordinator MISC 96
Animal Care Specialist POLICE 71
Animal Services Officer POLICE 84
Animal Shelter Manager MGMT 3040
Aquatics Coordinator MISC 83
Arborist MISC 114
Arts Program Coordinator MISC 71
Assistant City Attorney MGMT 2050
Assistant City Engineer MGMT 2030
Assistant City Manager MGMT 2060
Assistant Director of Public Works MGMT 2030
Assistant Planner MISC 106
Assistant to the City Manager MGMT 2010
Associate Civil Engineer² MISC 133
Associate Planner MISC 114
Building Code Enforcement Inspector MISC 106
Building Inspector MISC 106
Building Official MGMT 2020
Building Plan Checker MISC 122
Chief Building Inspector MISC 133
Chief of Marine Safety MGMT 2040
City Attorney CONTRACT
City Clerk ELECTED
City Engineer MGMT 2040
City Manager CONTRACT
City Treasurer ELECTED
Civilian Fire Marshal MISC 140
Civilian Services Administrator MGMT 3000
City of Laguna Beach
Classification Title and Range Assignment
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
34 35 of 462
Code Enforcement Officer MISC 96
Code Enforcement Supervisor MISC 114
Code Enforcement Technician MISC 77
Communications Coordinator MISC 122
Communications Manager MGMT 2010
Community Services Officer I POLICE 83
Community Services Officer II POLICE 88
Cultural Arts Manager MISC 128
Cyber Security Analyst MISC 134
Deputy City Clerk¹ MISC 88
Deputy Director of Community Development MGMT 2030
Deputy Director of Public Works MGMT 2020
Deputy Fire Chief MGMT 2040
Director of Administrative Services MGMT 2050
Director of Community Development MGMT 2050
Director of Finance MGMT 2040
Director of Public Works and Utilities MGMT 2050
Director of Transit and Community Services MGMT 2040
Emergency Operations Coordinator MISC 128
Engineering Technician MISC 83
Environmental Technician MISC 83
Equipment Mechanic MISC 96
Equipment Operator MISC 88
Executive Assistant MGMT 2000
Finance Manager MGMT 2030
Fire Battalion Chief MGMT 3030
Fire Captain FIRE 122
Fire Chief MGMT 2060
Fire Engineer FIRE 110
Fire Safety Inspector MISC 104
Firefighter FIRE 100
Human Resources & Risk Manager MGMT 2030
Information System Specialist MISC 122
Information Technology Manager MGMT 2030
Jail Supervisor POLICE 100
Jailer POLICE 64
Maintenance Lead Worker MISC 98
Maintenance Supervisor MISC 114
Maintenance Worker MISC 66
Maintenance Worker I MISC 71
Maintenance Worker II MISC 83
Marine Safety Captain MGMT 2020
Marine Safety Lieutenant MISC 122
35 36 of 462
Marine Safety Officer MISC 104
Motor Sweeper Operator MISC 88
Network Administrator MISC 133
Office Specialist MISC 66
Paralegal MISC 104
Park Ranger POLICE 110
Parking Services Officer POLICE 77
Parking Services Officer/Accident Investigator POLICE 83 Parking Supervisor MISC 106
Parks Gardener MISC 83
Payroll Supervisor5 MISC 128
Permit Services Supervisor MISC 106
Permit Technician MISC 77
Planning Manager MGMT 2020
Planning Technician MISC 83
Police Captain MGMT 3020
Police Chief MGMT 2060
Police Corporal POLICE 122
Police Fleet Coordinator POLICE 95
Police Lieutenant MGMT 3010
Police Officer POLICE 112
Police Records Specialist³ POLICE 71
Police Recruit POLICE 112
Police Sergeant POLICE 133
Principal Human Resources Analyst4,5 MISC 122
Principal Planner MISC 128
Procurement Officer MISC 133
Project Coordinator MISC 114
Project Director MGMT 2020
Project Manager MISC 122
Public Safety Dispatcher POLICE 96
Public Works Technician MISC 83
Records Management Coordinator MISC 77
Recreation Coordinator MISC 83
Recreation Manager MGMT 2010
Recreation Supervisor MISC 106
Senior Accountant MISC 114
Senior Administrative Analyst4,5 MISC 106
Senior Building Inspector MISC 114
Senior Building Inspector/Code Enforcement Specialist MISC 122 Senior Building Inspector/Plans Checker MISC 122
Senior Equipment Mechanic MISC 104
Senior Fleet Maintenance Supervisor MISC 122
36 37 of 462
Senior Information Technology Analyst MISC 128
Senior Management Analyst4,5 MISC 128
Senior Office Specialist¹ MISC 71
Senior Parking Services Officer POLICE 88
Senior Permit Technician MISC 83
Senior Plan Checker MISC 133
Senior Planner MISC 122
Senior Principal Planner MISC 134
Senior Project Manager MISC 128
Senior Public Safety Dispatcher POLICE 106
Senior Public Works Analyst/Solid Waste Program Coordinator5 MISC 122 Senior Recreation Supervisor MISC 122
Senior Services Coordinator MISC 104
Senior Water Quality Analyst5 MISC 122
Support Services Supervisor POLICE 133
Systems Analyst MISC 122
Transit Supervisor MISC 106
Wastewater Collections Supervisor MISC 128
Wastewater Mechanical & Facilities Supervisor MISC 122
Wastewater Technician I MISC 77
Wastewater Technician II MISC 88
Wastewater Utility Lead Worker MISC 98
Wastewater Utility Worker I MISC 71
Wastewater Utility Worker II MISC 83
Zoning Administrator MGMT 2020
2. Plus 5% with Civil Engineering Registration
3. Plus 5% shift bonus
4. Confidential in Human Resources
5. Incumbents receive an additional 5% in pay in exchange for these classifications being overtime exempt
1. Plus 5% assignment pay for those who take minutes on a regular basis at the Planning Commission, Design Review Board, & City Council Meetings 37 38 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Maintenance Worker Hourly $ 24.97 $ 26.22 $ 27.53 $ 28.91 $ 30.35 $ 31.87 $ 33.47 $ 35.14 MISC - 66 Office Specialist Monthly $ 4,329 $ 4,546 $ 4,773 $ 5,012 $ 5,262 $ 5,525 $ 5,802 $ 6,092 Annual $ 51,951 $ 54,549 $ 57,276 $ 60,140 $ 63,147 $ 66,305 $ 69,620 $ 73,101 Arts Program Coordinator Hourly $ 26.40 $ 27.72 $ 29.10 $ 30.57 $ 32.10 $ 33.72 $ 35.44 $ 37.23 MISC - 71 Maintenance Worker I Monthly $ 4,577 $ 4,805 $ 5,045 $ 5,299 $ 5,565 $ 5,846 $ 6,143 $ 6,454 Senior Office Specialist Annual $ 54,922 $ 57,661 $ 60,541 $ 63,589 $ 66,780 $ 70,151 $ 73,716 $ 77,449 Wastewater Utility Worker I
Code Enforcement Technician Hourly $ 28.31 $ 29.75 $ 31.20 $ 32.75 $ 34.43 $ 36.16 $ 37.98 $ 39.87 MISC - 77 Permit Technician Monthly $ 4,908 $ 5,157 $ 5,409 $ 5,677 $ 5,969 $ 6,269 $ 6,584 $ 6,912 Records Management Coordinator Annual $ 58,901 $ 61,884 $ 64,907 $ 68,123 $ 71,624 $ 75,227 $ 79,012 $ 82,939 Wastewater Technician I
Aquatics Coordinator Hourly $ 30.51 $ 32.05 $ 33.70 $ 35.31 $ 37.08 $ 38.94 $ 40.90 $ 42.94 Engineering Technician Monthly $ 5,289 $ 5,556 $ 5,842 $ 6,120 $ 6,428 $ 6,751 $ 7,090 $ 7,444 Environmental Technician Annual $ 63,473 $ 66,677 $ 70,099 $ 73,445 $ 77,139 $ 81,014 $ 85,083 $ 89,333 MISC - 83 Maintenance Worker II
Parks Gardener
Planning Technician
Public Works Technician
Recreation Coordinator
Senior Permit Technician
Wastewater Utility Worker II
Administrative Assistant1,4 Hourly $ 32.24 $ 33.86 $ 35.55 $ 37.30 $ 39.13 $ 41.09 $ 43.20 $ 45.37 MISC - 88 Deputy City Clerk1 Monthly $ 5,590 $ 5,870 $ 6,163 $ 6,466 $ 6,783 $ 7,124 $ 7,490 $ 7,865 Equipment Operator Annual $ 67,077 $ 70,435 $ 73,962 $ 77,591 $ 81,402 $ 85,483 $ 89,875 $ 94,383 Motor Sweeper Operator
Wastewater Technician II
Accounting Technician Hourly $ 35.42 $ 37.15 $ 38.98 $ 40.96 $ 42.98 $ 45.13 $ 47.40 $ 49.74 MISC- 96 Administrative Analyst3,4 Monthly $ 6,140 $ 6,440 $ 6,757 $ 7,100 $ 7,451 $ 7,823 $ 8,217 $ 8,623 Ambulance Program Coordinator Annual $ 73,677 $ 77,281 $ 81,079 $ 85,199 $ 89,410 $ 93,879 $ 98,607 $ 103,476 Code Enforcement Officer
Equipment Mechanic
Maintenance Lead Worker Hourly $ 36.26 $ 38.06 $ 39.99 $ 41.97 $ 44.09 $ 46.27 $ 48.58 $ 51.02 MISC - 98 Wastewater Utility Lead Worker Monthly $ 6,286 $ 6,598 $ 6,933 $ 7,275 $ 7,644 $ 8,020 $ 8,422 $ 8,845 Annual $ 75,434 $ 79,180 $ 83,197 $ 87,305 $ 91,722 $ 96,243 $ 101,061 $ 106,137 Fire Safety Inspector Hourly $ 38.94 $ 40.89 $ 42.94 $ 45.05 $ 47.33 $ 49.68 $ 52.20 $ 55 Marine Safety Officer Monthly $ 6,750 $ 7,088 $ 7,443 $ 7,810 $ 8,205 $ 8,611 $ 9,048 $ 9,496 MISC - 104 Paralegal Annual $ 81,001 $ 85,057 $ 89,320 $ 93,724 $ 98,465 $ 103,334 $ 108,579 $ 113,952 Senior Equipment Mechanic
Senior Services Coordinator
City of Laguna Beach
Salary Schedule
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION - Effective 7/1/2025
38 39 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Accountant Hourly $ 39.90 $ 41.84 $ 43.95 $ 46.15 $ 48.46 $ 50.90 $ 53.45 $ 56.13 Assistant Planner Monthly $ 6,917 $ 7,254 $ 7,619 $ 8,000 $ 8,401 $ 8,824 $ 9,266 $ 9,730 Building Code Enforcement Inspector Annual $ 83,003 $ 87,046 $ 91,425 $ 95,998 $ 100,816 $ 105,892 $ 111,188 $ 116,755 Building Inspector
MISC - 106 Parking Supervisor
Permit Services Supervisor
Recreation Supervisor
Senior Administrative Analyst3,4
Transit Supervisor
Arborist Hourly $ 43.84 $ 46.03 $ 48.33 $ 50.80 $ 53.30 $ 55.97 $ 58.76 $ 61.70 Associate Planner Monthly $ 7,599 $ 7,979 $ 8,378 $ 8,806 $ 9,239 $ 9,702 $ 10,186 $ 10,695 MISC - 114 Code Enforcement Supervisor Annual $ 91,193 $ 95,752 $ 100,531 $ 105,672 $ 110,865 $ 116,419 $ 122,232 $ 128,341 Maintenance Supervisor
Project Coordinator
Senior Accountant
Senior Building Inspector
Building Plan Checker Hourly $ 48.23 $ 50.64 $ 53.18 $ 55.87 $ 58.63 $ 61.58 $ 64.67 $ 67.90 Communications Coordinator Monthly $ 8,360 $ 8,779 $ 9,218 $ 9,684 $ 10,163 $ 10,675 $ 11,210 $ 11,769 Information System Specialist Annual $ 100,325 $ 105,349 $ 110,619 $ 116,212 $ 121,960 $ 128,096 $ 134,516 $ 141,232 Marine Safety Lieutenant
MISC - 122 Principal Human Resources Analyst3,4
Project Manager
Senior Building Inspector/Plans Checker
Senior Building Inspector/Code Enforcement Specialist
Senior Fleet Maintenance Supervisor
Senior Planner
Senior Public Works Analyst/Solid Waste Program Coordinator3 Senior Recreation Supervisor
Senior Water Quality Analyst3
Systems Analyst
Wastewater Collections Supervisor
Accounting Supervisor3 Hourly $ 51.93 $ 54.54 $ 57.24 $ 60.08 $ 63.10 $ 66.30 $ 69.60 $ 73.07 Cultural Arts Manager Monthly $ 9,002 $ 9,455 $ 9,922 $ 10,415 $ 10,938 $ 11,493 $ 12,065 $ 12,666 MISC - 128 Emergency Operations Coordinator Annual $ 108,023 $ 113,461 $ 119,067 $ 124,983 $ 131,261 $ 137,913 $ 144,784 $ 151,992 Payroll Supervisor3
Principal Planner
Senior Information Technology Analyst
Senior Project Manager
Senior Management Analyst3,4
Wastewater Mechanical & Facilities Supervisor
Associate Civil Engineer2 Hourly $ 54.87 $ 57.59 $ 60.46 $ 63.49 $ 66.67 $ 70.01 $ 73.53 $ 77.20 Chief Building Inspector Monthly $ 9,512 $ 9,984 $ 10,481 $ 11,006 $ 11,557 $ 12,136 $ 12,747 $ 13,382 MISC - 133 Network Administrator Annual $ 114,146 $ 119,803 $ 125,771 $ 132,074 $ 138,688 $ 145,637 $ 152,961 $ 160,582 Procurement Officer
Senior Plan Checker
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION - Effective 7/1/2025
39 40 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Cyber Security Analyst Hourly $ 56.20 $ 58.98 $ 61.93 $ 65.03 $ 68.29 $ 71.71 $ 75.33 $ 79.07 MISC - 134 Senior Principal Planner Monthly $ 9,742 $ 10,225 $ 10,736 $ 11,272 $ 11,838 $ 12,430 $ 13,058 $ 13,707 Annual $ 116,910 $ 122,697 $ 128,832 $ 135,265 $ 142,059 $ 149,163 $ 156,694 $ 164,483 Hourly $ 65.28 $ 68.54 $ 71.97 $ 75.57 $ 79.35 $ 83.31 $ 87.48 $ 91.85 MISC - 140 Civilian Fire Marshal Monthly $ 11,316 $ 11,881 $ 12,475 $ 13,099 $ 13,754 $ 14,442 $ 15,164 $ 15,922 Annual $ 135,786 $ 142,576 $ 149,705 $ 157,190 $ 165,049 $ 173,302 $ 181,967 $ 191,065
1. Plus 5% assignment pay for those who take minutes on a regular basis at the Planning Commission, Design Review Board, & City Council meetings
2. Plus 5% with Civil Engineering Registration
3. Incumbents receive an additional 5% in pay in exchange for these classifications being overtime exempt
4. Confidential in Human Resources Revised 2/27/2026
"Employee pay is based on an hourly rate maintained in the City’s financial system. The rates listed on the salary schedule are for illustrative purposes." MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION - Effective 7/1/2025
40 41 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Hourly $ 25.23 $ 26.50 $ 27.85 $ 29.25 $ 30.75 $ 32.24 $ 33.82 $ 35.51 POLICE - 64 Jailer Monthly $ 4,374 $ 4,594 $ 4,828 $ 5,071 $ 5,331 $ 5,590 $ 5,864 $ 6,156 Annual $ 52,485 $ 55,133 $ 57,935 $ 60,853 $ 63,976 $ 67,074 $ 70,365 $ 73,874 Animal Care Specialist Hourly $ 26.12 $ 27.44 $ 28.83 $ 30.25 $ 31.75 $ 33.37 $ 35.07 $ 36.84 POLICE - 71 Police Records Specialist1 Monthly $ 4,529 $ 4,757 $ 4,998 $ 5,244 $ 5,504 $ 5,784 $ 6,079 $ 6,386 Annual $ 54,348 $ 57,086 $ 59,979 $ 62,922 $ 66,046 $ 69,414 $ 72,949 $ 76,638 Hourly $ 28.02 $ 29.43 $ 30.87 $ 32.40 $ 34.07 $ 35.78 $ 37.58 $ 39.45 POLICE - 77 Parking Services Officer Monthly $ 4,857 $ 5,102 $ 5,352 $ 5,617 $ 5,907 $ 6,203 $ 6,515 $ 6,840 Annual $ 58,282 $ 61,226 $ 64,221 $ 67,408 $ 70,879 $ 74,440 $ 78,180 $ 82,075 Community Services Officer I Hourly $ 30.19 $ 31.72 $ 33.34 $ 34.94 $ 36.69 $ 38.54 $ 40.47 $ 42.49 POLICE - 83 Parking Services Officer/Accident Investigator Monthly $ 5,234 $ 5,498 $ 5,779 $ 6,057 $ 6,360 $ 6,681 $ 7,015 $ 7,367 Annual $ 62,807 $ 65,982 $ 69,349 $ 72,679 $ 76,317 $ 80,173 $ 84,183 $ 88,400 Hourly $ 30.93 $ 32.49 $ 34.15 $ 35.79 $ 37.58 $ 39.48 $ 41.46 $ 43.53 POLICE - 84 Animal Services Officer Monthly $ 5,361 $ 5,632 $ 5,919 $ 6,204 $ 6,515 $ 6,844 $ 7,187 $ 7,546 Annual $ 64,336 $ 67,588 $ 71,033 $ 74,453 $ 78,180 $ 82,127 $ 86,240 $ 90,546 Community Services Officer II Hourly $ 31.91 $ 33.50 $ 35.18 $ 36.91 $ 38.72 $ 40.66 $ 42.75 $ 44.90 POLICE - 88 Senior Parking Services Officer Monthly $ 5,532 $ 5,807 $ 6,098 $ 6,398 $ 6,712 $ 7,048 $ 7,412 $ 7,783 Annual $ 66,380 $ 69,684 $ 73,180 $ 76,779 $ 80,546 $ 84,582 $ 88,940 $ 93,400 Hourly $ 34.65 $ 36.33 $ 38.11 $ 40.00 $ 42.07 $ 44.12 $ 46.36 $ 48.67 POLICE - 95 Police Fleet Coordinator Monthly $ 6,006 $ 6,298 $ 6,607 $ 6,935 $ 7,293 $ 7,648 $ 8,037 $ 8,437 Annual $ 72,075 $ 75,571 $ 79,286 $ 83,219 $ 87,513 $ 91,780 $ 96,447 $ 101,241 Hourly $ 36.24 $ 38.01 $ 39.88 $ 41.91 $ 43.98 $ 46.18 $ 48.51 $ 50.91 POLICE - 96 Public Safety Dispatcher Monthly $ 6,283 $ 6,590 $ 6,914 $ 7,266 $ 7,625 $ 8,005 $ 8,409 $ 8,824 Annual $ 75,390 $ 79,081 $ 82,967 $ 87,192 $ 91,496 $ 96,060 $ 100,911 $ 105,893 Hourly $ 37.75 $ 39.58 $ 41.53 $ 43.59 $ 45.84 $ 48.08 $ 50.52 $ 53.03 POLICE - 100 Jail Supervisor Monthly $ 6,544 $ 6,861 $ 7,200 $ 7,556 $ 7,946 $ 8,334 $ 8,757 $ 9,192 Annual $ 78,528 $ 82,332 $ 86,394 $ 90,675 $ 95,354 $ 100,007 $ 105,085 $ 110,304 Hourly $ 40.83 $ 42.82 $ 44.97 $ 47.23 $ 49.59 $ 52.09 $ 54.70 $ 57.44 POLICE - 106 Senior Public Safety Dispatcher Monthly $ 7,078 $ 7,423 $ 7,796 $ 8,188 $ 8,596 $ 9,030 $ 9,482 $ 9,957 Annual $ 84,936 $ 89,070 $ 93,556 $ 98,251 $ 103,154 $ 108,358 $ 113,783 $ 119,482 Hourly $ 57.21 $ 60.05 $ 63.04 $ 66.20 $ 69.51 $ 72.99 $ 76.67 $ 80.49 POLICE - 133 Support Services Supervisor Monthly $ 9,917 $ 10,409 $ 10,927 $ 11,475 $ 12,050 $ 12,652 $ 13,290 $ 13,952 Annual $ 118,999 $ 124,907 $ 131,127 $ 137,700 $ 144,599 $ 151,823 $ 159,478 $ 167,420
1. Plus 5% shift bonus
POLICE EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION - PROFESSIONAL - Effective 1/1/2026 41 42 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Hourly $ 32.13 $ 33.76 $ 35.48 $ 37.19 $ 39.04 $ 41.02 $ 43.08 $ 45.23 POLICE - 110 Park Ranger Monthly $ 5,570 $ 5,853 $ 6,151 $ 6,446 $ 6,769 $ 7,110 $ 7,467 $ 7,841 Annual $ 66,843 $ 70,230 $ 73,813 $ 77,356 $ 81,224 $ 85,325 $ 89,608 $ 94,086 Hourly $ 46.80 $ 49.20 $ 51.64 $ 54.26 $ 56.92 $ 59.79 $ 62.71 $ 65.83 POLICE - 112 Police Officer Monthly $ 8,113 $ 8,528 $ 8,951 $ 9,407 $ 9,867 $ 10,364 $ 10,871 $ 11,412 Annual $ 97,357 $ 102,341 $ 107,416 $ 112,880 $ 118,409 $ 124,367 $ 130,454 $ 136,944 Hourly $ 52.82 $ 55.46 $ 58.24 $ 61.18 $ 64.20 $ 67.43 $ 70.81 $ 74.34 POLICE - 122 Police Corporal Monthly $ 9,156 $ 9,613 $ 10,096 $ 10,605 $ 11,130 $ 11,689 $ 12,274 $ 12,886 Annual $ 109,869 $ 115,359 $ 121,148 $ 127,261 $ 133,556 $ 140,266 $ 147,288 $ 154,634 Hourly $ 60.09 $ 63.07 $ 66.21 $ 69.53 $ 73.01 $ 76.67 $ 80.53 $ 84.53 POLICE - 133 Police Sergeant Monthly $ 10,416 $ 10,933 $ 11,477 $ 12,052 $ 12,656 $ 13,290 $ 13,959 $ 14,654 Annual $ 124,990 $ 131,194 $ 137,722 $ 144,627 $ 151,870 $ 159,475 $ 167,510 $ 175,842 Revised 2/27/2026
POLICE EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION - SWORN - Effective 1/1/2026 "Employee pay is based on an hourly rate maintained in the City’s financial system. The rates listed on the salary schedule are for illustrative purposes." 42 43 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Hourly (40hr) $ 40.06 $ 42.07 $ 44.19 $ 46.37 $ 48.69 $ 51.15 $ 53.68 $ 56.39 FIRE - 100 Firefighter Hourly (56hr)* $ 28.61 $ 30.05 $ 31.56 $ 33.12 $ 34.77 $ 36.53 $ 38.34 $ 40.28 Monthly $ 6,944 $ 7,292 $ 7,660 $ 8,038 $ 8,440 $ 8,867 $ 9,305 $ 9,776 Annual $ 83,326 $ 87,506 $ 91,919 $ 96,461 $ 101,277 $ 106,403 $ 111,660 $ 117,306 Hourly (40hr) $ 45.07 $ 47.33 $ 49.67 $ 52.20 $ 54.79 $ 57.51 $ 60.43 $ 63.45 FIRE - 110 Fire Engineer Hourly (56hr)* $ 32.19 $ 33.80 $ 35.48 $ 37.28 $ 39.14 $ 41.08 $ 43.16 $ 45.32 Monthly $ 7,813 $ 8,204 $ 8,611 $ 9,049 $ 9,499 $ 9,969 $ 10,475 $ 10,999 Annual $ 93,762 $ 98,447 $ 103,327 $ 108,584 $ 113,983 $ 119,629 $ 125,704 $ 131,985 Hourly (40hr) $ 52.10 $ 54.70 $ 57.46 $ 60.35 $ 63.34 $ 66.53 $ 69.86 $ 73.34 FIRE - 122 Fire Captain Hourly (56hr)* $ 37.21 $ 39.07 $ 41.04 $ 43.10 $ 45.24 $ 47.52 $ 49.90 $ 52.38 Monthly $ 9,031 $ 9,482 $ 9,960 $ 10,461 $ 10,979 $ 11,532 $ 12,110 $ 12,713 Annual $ 108,376 $ 113,789 $ 119,525 $ 125,535 $ 131,752 $ 138,384 $ 145,315 $ 152,558 *Hourly rate is calculated off 2,912 hours worked per year Revised 2/27/2026
FIREFIGHTER'S ASSOCIATION - Effective 7/1/2025
"Employee pay is based on an hourly rate maintained in the City’s financial system. The rates listed on the salary schedule are for illustrative purposes." 43 44 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 LIFE - 599 Lifeguard Trainee* Hourly $17.86
LIFE - 740 Ocean Lifeguard I Hourly $23.72 $24.92 $25.41 $25.93 $26.44 $26.93 $27.45 $27.97 LIFE - 750 Ocean Lifeguard II Hourly N/A $25.93 $26.44 $26.93 $27.45 $27.97 $28.48 $28.98 LIFE - 790 Ocean Lifeguard III Hourly N/A $30.00 $30.50 $31.02 $31.50 $32.03 $32.54 $33.05 Marine Safety Dispatcher
LIFE - 800 Recurrent Hourly Lifeguard Hourly $40.64
*Lifeguard Trainees are not covered under the LBMSA Agreement Revised 2/27/2026
MARINE SAFETY ASSOCIATION - Effective 1/1/2026
"Employee pay is based on an hourly rate maintained in the City’s financial system. The rates listed on the salary schedule are for illustrative purposes." 44 45 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6* Step 7* Step 8* HRLY - 900 Office Specialist (FT Range MISC-66) Hourly $24.97 $26.22 $27.53 $28.91 $30.35 $31.87 $33.47 $35.14 HRLY - 910 Wastewater Utility Worker I (FT Range MISC-71) Hourly $26.40 $27.71 $29.10 $30.57 $32.10 $33.72 $35.44 $37.23 HRLY - 915 Recreation Coordinator (FT Range MISC-83) Hourly $30.51 $32.05 $33.70 $35.31 $37.08 $38.94 $40.90 $42.94 HRLY - 920 Administrative Assistant (FT Range MISC-88) Hourly $32.24 $33.86 $35.55 $37.30 $39.13 $41.09 $43.20 $45.37 HRLY - 925 Administrative Analyst (FT Range MISC-96) Hourly $35.42 $37.15 $38.98 $40.96 $42.99 $45.13 $47.41 $49.75 HRLY - 945 Recreation Supervisor (FT Range MISC-106) Hourly $39.90 $41.84 $43.95 $46.15 $48.46 $50.90 $53.45 $56.13 Senior Administrative Analyst (FT Range MISC- 106)
HRLY - 960 Associate Planner (FT Range MISC-114) Hourly $43.84 $46.03 $48.33 $50.80 $53.30 $55.97 $58.76 $61.70 Digital Communications Coordinator (FT Range MISC-122) Hourly $48.23 $50.64 $53.18 $55.87 $58.63 $61.58 $64.67 $67.90 HRLY - 965 Senior Recreation Supervisor (FT Range MISC-122) Systems Analyst (FT Range MISC-122)
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6* Step 7* Step 8* PD HRLY - 895 Jailer (FT Range Police-64) Hourly $25.23 $26.50 $27.85 $29.25 $30.75 $32.24 $33.82 $35.51 PD HRLY - 905 Animal Care Specialist (FT Range Police-71) Hourly $26.12 $27.44 $28.83 $30.25 $31.75 $33.37 $35.07 $36.84 PD HRLY - 910 Parking Services Officer (FT Police Range 77) Hourly $28.02 $29.43 $30.87 $32.40 $34.07 $35.78 $37.58 $39.45 PD HRLY - 915 Parking Services Officer/Accident Investigator (FT Range Police - 83) Hourly $30.19 $31.72 $33.34 $34.94 $36.69 $38.54 $40.47 $42.49 PD HRLY - 916 Park Ranger (FT Range Police - 110) Hourly $31.82 $33.43 $35.14 $36.83 $38.67 $40.62 $42.66 $44.79 PD HRLY - 920 Community Services Officer II (FT Range Police - 88) Hourly $31.91 $33.50 $35.18 $36.91 $38.72 $40.66 $42.75 $44.90 PD HRLY - 930 Public Safety Dispatcher (FT Range Police - 96) Hourly $36.24 $38.01 $39.88 $41.91 $43.98 $46.18 $48.51 $50.91 PD HRLY - 940 Senior Public Safety Dispatcher (FT Range Police - 106) Hourly $40.83 $42.82 $44.97 $47.23 $49.59 $52.09 $54.70 $57.44 PD HRLY - 950 Police Officer (FT Range Police - 112) Hourly $46.35 $48.72 $51.14 $53.74 $56.38 $59.21 $62.11 $65.20 Revised
HOURLY/PART TIME - MISC (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT) - Effective 7/1/2025 HOURLY/PART TIME - POLICE (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT) - Effective 1/1/2026 2/27/2026
"Employee pay is based on an hourly rate maintained in the City’s financial system. The rates listed on the salary schedule are for illustrative purposes." *Step 5 of the salary ranges for part-time positions shall serve as the control point of the salary range, and is the maximum advertised step for the positions. Steps 6 through Step 8 of the salary ranges are reserved for employees with exceptional performance, qualifications and circumstances and require approval by the Director of Human Resources and Risk Management.
45 46 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Community Services Leader Hourly $17.35
HRLY - 615 Laborer I
Parking Lot Attendant
Community Services Specialist Hourly $17.35
HRLY - 635 Office Assistant I
Transit Ambassador
HRLY - 650 Laborer II Hourly $17.35 $17.35 $17.35 $17.35 $17.43 $17.88 $18.34 HRLY - 655 Community Services Coordinator Hourly $17.35 $17.35 $17.69 $18.13 $18.56 $19.07 $19.57 HRLY - 673 Office Assistant II Hourly $17.43 $17.85 $18.33 $18.83 $19.33 $19.82 $20.32 Animal Care Specialist II Hourly $17.85 $18.33 $18.82 $19.34 $19.82 $20.32 $20.81 HRLY - 675 Laborer III
Trolley Fueler/Washer
HRLY - 685 Police Cadet Hourly $18.82 $19.34 $19.82 $20.32 $20.81 $21.32 $21.80 Weed Abatement Coordinator
Administrative Intern Hourly $19.82 $20.32 $20.81 $21.32 $21.80 $22.30 $22.79 HRLY - 695 Engineering Intern
Planning Intern
Recycling Technician
Laborer IV Hourly $20.81 $21.32 $21.80 $22.30 $22.79 $23.31 $23.78 HRLY - 705 Sr. Community Services Coordinator
Swim Instructor
Pool Lifeguard
Ambulance Operator Hourly $21.32 $21.80 $22.30 $22.79 $23.31 $23.78 $24.28 HRLY - 710 Civilian Enforcement Officer
Tidepool Educator
HOURLY/PART TIME - Effective 7/1/2025
46 47 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 HRLY - 725 Fire Prevention Officer Hourly $22.79 $23.31 $23.78 $24.28 $24.77 $25.29 $25.77 Sr. Pool Lifeguard
Aquatics Specialist Hourly $24.32 $24.80 $25.26 $25.73 $26.23 $26.70 $27.17 HRLY - 750 Senior Recycling Technician
Traffic Control Aide
HRLY - 795 Summer Festival Transit Supervisor Hourly $29.75 $30.23 $30.73 $31.23 $31.73 $32.21 $32.71 HRLY - 797 Arts Program Coordinator Hourly $36.38 $37.10 $37.84 $38.59 $39.37 $40.17 $40.97 HRLY - 799 Transit Programs Coordinator Hourly $61.69
HRLY - 810 Police Officer Reserve Hourly $36.22
HRLY - 970 Special Projects Coordinator Hourly $41.77
Minimum Maximum
MGMT HRLY - 990 Management Specialist Hourly $64.52 $139.12 Revised 2/27/2026
"Employee pay is based on an hourly rate maintained in the City’s financial system.
The rates listed on the salary schedule are for illustrative purposes." HOURLY/PART TIME - Effective 7/1/2025
47 48 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Minimum Maximum
Assistant City Manager Hourly $ 88.40 $ 144.89
MGMT - 2060 Police Chief 1 Monthly $ 15,323 $ 25,115
Fire Chief 1 Annual $ 183,876 $ 301,375
Assistant City Attorney Hourly $ 85.41 $ 127.26
MGMT - 2050 Director of Community Development Monthly $ 14,805 $ 22,060 Director of Public Works and Utilities 5 Annual $ 177,658 $ 264,717 Director of Administrative Services
Chief of Marine Safety 4 Hourly $ 75.48 $ 115.84
City Engineer Monthly $ 13,085 $ 20,080
MGMT - 2040 Deputy Fire Chief 2 Annual $ 157,017 $ 240,963 Director of Finance
Director of Transit and Community Services
Accounting Manager Hourly $ 64.98 $ 100.06
Assistant City Engineer Monthly $ 11,265 $ 17,345
MGMT - 2030 Deputy Director of Community Development Annual $ 135,174 $ 208,141 Assistant Director of Public Works
Human Resources & Risk Manager
Finance Manager
Information Technology Manager
Building Official Hourly $ 61.25 $ 91.85
Deputy Director of Public Works Monthly $ 10,618 $ 15,922 MGMT - 2020 Marine Safety Captain Annual $ 127,411 $ 191,065 Planning Manager
Project Director
Zoning Administrator
Communications Manager Hourly $ 61.96 $ 75.73
MGMT - 2010 Assistant to the City Manager Monthly $ 10,740 $ 13,127 Recreation Manager Annual $ 128,884 $ 157,520
Hourly $ 34.96 $ 52.44
MGMT - 2000 Executive Assistant Monthly $ 6,061 $ 9,091 Annual $ 72,735 $ 109,095
MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL - Effective 7/1/2025
48 49 of 462
Salary Range Classification Title Minimum Maximum
Hourly $ 47.10 $ 72.52
MGMT - 3030 Fire Battalion Chief 2 Monthly $ 11,429 $ 17,598 Annual $ 137,151 $ 211,172
Salary Range Classification Title Minimum Maximum
Hourly $ 36.65 $ 51.48
MGMT - 3040 Animal Shelter Manager 6 Monthly $ 6,353 $ 8,924 Annual $ 76,240 $ 107,091
Hourly $ 87.51 $ 109.40
MGMT - 3020 Police Captain 3 Monthly $ 15,169 $ 18,963
Annual $ 182,032 $ 227,552
Hourly $ 80.33 $ 100.41
MGMT - 3010 Police Lieutenant 3 Monthly $ 13,924 $ 17,406 Annual $ 167,089 $ 208,867
Hourly $ 61.55 $ 92.30
MGMT - 3000 Civilian Services Administrator 4 Monthly $ 10,669 $ 15,999 Annual $ 128,027 $ 191,988
POLICE & FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION - FIRE UNIT - Effective 7/1/2025 POLICE & FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION - POLICE UNIT - Effective 7/1/2025 49 50 of 462
Classification Title Minimum Maximum
Hourly $ - $ 148.50
City Attorney Monthly $ 25,740
Annual $ - $ 308,880
Minimum Maximum
Hourly $ - $ 156.43
City Manager Monthly $ 27,115
Annual $ - $ 325,380
Classification Title Minimum Maximum
ELECTED City Clerk Annual $ - $ 197,545
Minimum Maximum
ELECTED City Treasurer (27.269 Hrs/Week) Annual $ 77,216 121,319$
1. Both the Police Chief and Fire Chief are eligible to receive 5% in certification/education incentives
4. Incumbents in the positions of Chief of Marine Safety and Civilian Services Administrator are eligible to receive 2.5% for a Bachelor's Degree.
5. Incumbents in the position of Director of Public Works and Utilities are eligible to receive 2.5% for obtaining Professional Engineer (PE) License.
6. As part of the City’s Classification and Compensation Study, this position is anticipated to be updated, which may include reclassification and retitling to Animal Shelter Manager and placement in the PFMA.
Revised 2/27/2026
2. Incumbents in the positions of Deputy Fire Chief and Fire Battalion Chief are eligible to receive 2.5% for a Chief Officer certification, 2.5% for a Bachelor's Degree, and 2.5% for a Master's Degree
3. Incumbents in the positions of Police Captain and Police Lieutenant are eligible to receive 2.5% for a Management POST certificate, 2.5% for a Bachelor's Degree, and 2.5% for a Master's Degree.
"Employee pay is based on an hourly rate maintained in the City’s financial system.
The rates listed on the salary schedule are for illustrative purposes." ELECTED OFFICIALS - 7/8/2025
CONTRACT - 7/1/2025
50 51 of 462
RESOLUTION NO. 26.XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO
CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, POLICIES, AND
BENEFITS FOR UNREPRESENTED EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES;
AND FINDING THE ACTION IS NOT A PROJECT WITHIN
THE MEANING OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the employees covered by this Resolution constitute certain Executive Management and Management personnel (as further identified in Section 1 of Attachment A, referenced below [the “Management Classification Employees”]); and WHEREAS, the Executive Management/Management Employees are unrepresented and have historically been subject to certain City policies regarding employment and have received certain benefits of employment, including policies and benefits consistent with certain terms set forth in the Laguna Beach Municipal Employees Association’s Memorandum of Understanding.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager and his/her delegated staff, to implement the provisions of this Resolution and the Conditions of Employment, Policies, and Benefits for the Unrepresented Executive Management/Management Employees, as more fully set forth in Attachment A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) that the action consists of the creation of government funding mechanisms or other Attachment 9
51 52 of 462
-2- Reso. #
government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and therefore does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the CEQA. (Public Resources Code Section 21065; 14 CCR Section 15378(b)(4).) Here, the consolidation of policies of employment, including benefits, is a government fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is therefore not a project within the meaning of CEQA.
ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026.
Mark Orgill, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ann Marie McKay, City Clerk
I, Ann Marie McKay, City Clerk of the City of Laguna Beach, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26.XXX was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on April 14, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk, City of Laguna Beach, California
52 53 of 462
-3- Reso. #
ATTACHMENT A
CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, POLICIES, AND BENEFITS
FOR UNREPRESENTED EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES
Unless otherwise identified, the terms and conditions of this document are effective July 1, 2025. If a term or condition has a more specific effective date, then that date governs that specific term or condition.
SECTION 1: Classifications Subject to this Resolution
The following constitute those certain unrepresented Executive Management and Management classifications that are subject to this Resolution (“Management Classifications”):
2060 Assistant City Manager
2060 Police Chief
2060 Fire Chief
2050 Director of Community Development
2050 Director of Public Works and Utilities
2050 Assistant City Attorney
2050 Director of Administrative Services
2040 Chief of Marine Safety
2040 City Engineer
2040 Deputy Fire Chief
2040 Director of Transit and Community Services
2030 Accounting Manager
2030 Assistant City Engineer
2030 Deputy Director of Community Development
2030 Assistant Director of Public Works
2030 Human Resources and Risk Manager
2030 Finance Manager
2030 Information Technology Manager
2020 Building Official
2020 Deputy Director of Public Works
2020 Marine Safety Captain
2020 Planning Manager
2020 Project Director
2020 Zoning Administrator
2010 Communications Manager
2010 Assistant to the City Manager
2010 Recreation Manager
2000 Executive Assistant
53 54 of 462
-4- Reso. #
SECTION 2: At-Will Employment
All employees in the Management Classifications (“Management Classification Employees”) are at-will employees, as that term is defined by California Labor Code Section 2922. Nothing in this Resolution shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the City Manager to terminate the employment of any Management Classification Employee at any time, with or without cause. In the event of termination, the City shall pay the Management Classification Employee for all services through the date of termination and such Management Classification Employee shall have no right to any additional compensation or payment; provided, however, that a severance may be provided at the discretion of the City Manager, as set forth in Section 5, below.
SECTION 3: Incorporation of Terms from the Laguna Beach Municipal Employees Association Memorandum of Understanding
The following conditions of employment, policies and benefits set forth below apply to all Management Classification Employees. The conditions are adopted from the provisions of the Laguna Beach Municipal Employees Association (LBMEA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), dated July 1, 2025 – September 30, 2026. For later ease of reference, the specific location within the LBMEA MOU is noted in brackets:
a) [Article 6: Salary and Compensation]
i. [Section 6.5: Compensation When Acting out of Classification] This provision is effective July 1, 2022.
Management Classification Employees shall receive 5% of their current base salary for working out of classification for 15 or more consecutive work days. This pay is for when an employee is working in an upgraded classification for a limited duration. The acting pay will commence on the first day of the pay period during which the employee worked the 16th consecutive day.
The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, the compensation for acting out of classification is a special compensation for “classic member” employees and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(3) Temporary Upgrade Pay. This pay shall not be reported for “new members” as defined under PEPRA. However, it is ultimately CalPERS who determines whether any form of pay is reportable special compensation. ii. [Section 6.10: Direct Deposit]
All Management Classification Employees shall participate in the City’s Direct Deposit Program.
b) [Article 7.0 (exclusive of Section 7.5): Vacation]
i. [7.1 Vacation Accrual]
Each full-time Management Classification Employee shall accrue vacation leave as follows:
Hours of Vacation Accrued
0 thru 9 yrs. service 5.24 hrs. biweekly
54 55 of 462
-5- Reso. #
10 + yrs. service 6.77 hrs. biweekly
Years of service for eligibility for vacation are based on years of service at a public agency. This includes both time with the City and with any other public agency where the employee was employed. “Public agency” means any city, county, district, other local authority, or public body of or within this state. See Government Code section 20056.
For current employees, this would start two pay periods after they submit a complete application and the City verifies previous government service.
Vacation leave accrues from the date of hire at bi-weekly rates consistent with the above schedule.
On June 24, 2013, all then current vacation accruals were placed in a bank (the “original” bank) in which additional vacation cannot be accrued. Vacation in the original bank will either be used or cashed out at the end of employment. As permitted to be agreed to by the parties, in accordance with Labor Code section 227.3, if cashed out, the value of the vacation will be at the employee’s base hourly rate of pay on June 23, 2013.
On June 24, 2013, a new vacation accrual bank was created. Each year in the first pay period in December, employees will be paid for any vacation in that bank above 400 hours at their base hourly rate of pay.
In accordance with Sections 7.2 and 7.3, employees may still use their vacation (both banks) and request pay for vacation time. However, for each employee, once the original bank has no more vacation hours in it, it will be closed. ii. [7.2 Use of Vacation]
Vacation leave may be taken as it accrues. The dates of vacation leave may be selected by the employee, but shall be approved by the department head and/or City Manager, who shall consider the wishes of the employee and the needs of the City. The City may limit the approval of vacation for deployment operational reasons. Once it is approved, the City may cancel vacation only in the event of an unavoidable emergency.
iii. [7.3 Pay for Vacation Time:]
By December 15 of each year, employees may make an irrevocable election to cash out up to the maximum number of hours of vacation leave which they can accrue per year which will be earned in the following calendar year at the employee’s base rate of pay. In the following year, the employee can receive the cash for the vacation leave they irrevocably elected to cash out in either two (2) separate increments of up to half their annual accrual cap (i.e., for those who accrue 6.77 hours per pay period – 176 hours per year, 88 hours each) or one (1) 55 56 of 462
-6- Reso. #
increment of up the maximum they can accrue in a year.
The employee would be paid one half of what they irrevocably elect to cashout hours on both the second pay day in July and the first pay day on December or the employee can elect to be paid their full amount they elected to cash out on the first pay day in December. However, if the employee’s vacation leave balance is less than the amount the employee elected to cashout (in the prior calendar year) the employee will receive cash for the amount of leave the employee has accrued at the time of the cash out.
If an employee makes an irrevocable election to cash out vacation leave in the following calendar year and uses vacation leave in that subsequent year, the vacation leave used will come from vacation leave the employee had earned prior to January 1 of the year the employee has elected to cash out vacation leave. This is to ensure that assuming an employee had a vacation leave balance prior to January 1, the vacation leave used will not result in a reduction in the amount of vacation leave the employee will be eligible to cash out. In addition to the above, an employee who has an “unforeseen emergency” (defined as an unanticipated emergency that is caused by an event beyond the control of the employee and that would result in severe financial hardship to the employee if early withdrawal were not permitted) shall be entitled to make a request to the Director of Human Resources & Risk Management for a payoff of up to one year’s accrual of vacation. The amount of vacation which may be paid off is limited to the amount necessary to meet the emergency.
iv. [7.4 Payment for Unused Vacation Upon Termination:] Any employee who is about to terminate their employment and who has unused vacation time in either bank shall be paid for such vacation time in their final paycheck. As noted above, payment of vacation time in the original bank will be paid (as permitted by Labor Code section 227.3 with an agreement of the parties) at the employee’s base hourly rate of pay as of June 23, 2013. It shall not be necessary to carry such employee on the payroll for the vacation period and the vacancy thus created may be filled at any time after the effective date of termination. When termination is caused by death of the employee, payment shall be made to the employee's designated beneficiary or in accordance with the law. v. [7.6 Holidays Within Vacation Leave:]
If a holiday falls within a scheduled vacation period, the day of the holiday shall be holiday leave and not deducted from vacation.
c) [Article 8.0: Holidays]
i. [8.1 Recognized Holidays:]
The following holidays shall be observed by the City of Laguna Beach:
1. New Year's Day - January 1st
56 57 of 462
-7- Reso. #
2. Martin Luther King Jr. Day – 3rd Monday in January
3. President’s Day - 3rd Monday in February
4. Memorial Day - Last Monday in May 165.
5. Juneteenth – June 19
6. Independence Day - July 4th
7. Labor Day - 1st Monday in September
8. Veterans Day - November 11th
9. Thanksgiving Day - 4th Thursday in November
10. The day after Thanksgiving
11. Christmas Day - December 25th
Management Classification Employees will be paid for the holiday provided that they were in paid status (either receive paying or using accrued paid leave) the day before and the day after a holiday.
ii. [8.2 Weekend Holidays:]
For those employees whose normal work week begins on Monday, when a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be deemed to be the holiday in lieu of the day observed. If a holiday falls on a Saturday in the case of employees whose normal work week ends on Friday, the employee shall be entitled to the Friday prior to the holiday. For those employees who work an alternate work schedule, e.g., 9/80 plan, when a holiday falls on a regularly scheduled day off, the first work day following the observed holiday shall be deemed to be a holiday, e.g., Tuesday, when the observed holiday falls on a Sunday or Monday. If the observed holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, it shall be moved to the last work day prior to the observed holiday, e.g., Thursday.
d) [Article 9.0 (exclusive of Section 9.3): Sick Leave] i. [9.1 Sick Leave Accruals:]
Every full-time, Management Classification Employee shall accrue sick leave time at the rate of 80 hours per year, 3.08 hours per pay period. Unused sick leave may be accumulated without limit.
ii. [9.2 Evidence of Illness:]
When an employee uses sick leave, the appointing authority may require a physician's certificate. Unless the employee’s supervisor suspects that an employee is abusing their sick leave a request for a physician certification can only be made for an absence of at least five consecutive workdays. iii. [9.4 Sick Leave and Temporary Disability:]
A City employee who is entitled to temporary disability indemnity under the State Labor Code may elect to take that number of hours or portions of hours of their accumulated sick leave, or their accumulated vacation, as when added to the disability indemnity will result in a payment to the employee of their full salary.
When accumulated sick leave, or vacation, or both, are exhausted, the employee 57 58 of 462
-8- Reso. #
may be still entitled to receive disability indemnity.
iv. [9.5 Sick Leave for Dependent Care:]
A Management Classification Employee shall be eligible to use accrued sick leave in accordance with the law to care for an ill parent (including parent in law), spouse, registered domestic partner, child, grandparent, grandchild, sibling or designated person. The amount of sick leave which can be used for such purpose is one half of one year’s annual accrued sick leave, which is currently equal to 40 hours per year.
v. [9.6 Illness While on Vacation:]
An employee who becomes ill while on vacation may have such period of illness charged to their accumulated sick leave instead of to vacation provided that:
immediately upon return to duty, the employee submits to their immediate supervisor or the Human Resources & Risk Manager a written request for sick leave;
vi. [9.7 Holidays During Sick Leave:]
Observed holidays occurring during sick leave shall not be counted as a day of sick leave.
vii. [9.8 Payment for Unused Sick Leave:]
Payment for accrued sick leave will be available as follows:
a) Sick leave earned on or after June 24, 2013 – Sick leave earned on or after June 24, 2013 can be cashed in (into the RHS Plan) at the rate of fifty percent (50%) of its value upon death, retirement for disability or service, resignation or layoff, but not if dismissed or terminated for cause to the extent that it is not used in each fiscal year.
b) Upon separation from the City, any sick leave not cashed into the RHS can be converted to CalPERS service credit per Government Code section 20965. The percentage used for conversion to service credit will be as set forth in paragraphs a-b above, i.e., based on when it was earned.
c) Except as provided above, cash-in (into the RHS Plan) can be requested in October or May of each fiscal year. Sick leave not cashed in may be carried over for cash-in (into the RHS Plan) during October or May of future fiscal years. Cashin (into the RHS Plan) may be made one additional time each year under extraordinary circumstances.
e) [Article 11.0: Bereavement Leave]
Employees shall be entitled to a maximum of hours equivalent to three (3) full working days absence with pay, (e.g., an employee working 12-hour shifts would receive 36 hours, an employee working nine-hour shifts would receive 27 hours) for bereavement leave. 58 59 of 462
-9- Reso. #
Bereavement leave can be used for the death, or critical illness where death appears to be imminent, of the employee’s immediate family. Employees shall be entitled to a maximum of two (2) bereavement leaves per calendar year.
Employees who have been with the City for at least thirty (30) days before the leave commences shall receive additional leave up to three (3) days without pay, in any one (1) instance (which must be used within three (3) months from the date of death and which days do not need to be taken consecutively), for bereavement leave related to the death of an immediate family member. Employees may use any paid vacation and accrued and available sick leave, which is otherwise available to the employee for this purpose. "Immediate family" of the employee, the employee' s spouse or domestic partner shall be construed to mean: father, mother, step-parents, brother, sister, stepsiblings, wife, husband, child, step-child, grandmother, grandfather, grandchild or any relative of the employee or employee's spouse or domestic partner residing in the employee' s household for two or more years.
f) [Article 13.0: Education and Professional Development Reimbursement Program] The purpose of this program shall be the reimbursement for tuition and book expenses to employees attending classes on their own time, which are to the direct benefit of the individual employee and the City. The approval of a request is subject to budgetary limitations.
i. [13.1 Eligibility:]
All regular employees (as that term is defined by the City’s Personnel Rules, currently Rule 2.1) shall be eligible for reimbursement (for education and professional development) under this program. Employees who have not completed their probationary period may also be eligible for reimbursement under this program if the job performance of such employees, as indicated by the department head and/or City Manager, appears to show promise of completing the probationary period.
ii. [13.2 Procedure:]
The department head will determine what types of courses will be allowed for reimbursement prior to commitment by the employee. Permitted use of funds, subject to approval of the City Manager, includes tuition, books, laboratory and parking fee, certification maintenance and course fees. In addition, professional association memberships, seminars, conferences, including material fees, and travel costs are included. Courses considered by the City Manager for reimbursement shall be designed to directly improve the knowledge of the employee in the public service, which will improve performance and enhance advancement opportunities. The department head and/or City Manager may recommend reimbursement upon the successful completion of college or professional conference/development courses. Each employee is limited to a maximum payment of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per fiscal year, dependent 59 60 of 462
-10- Reso. #
upon the availability of budgeted monies. The City Manager may authorize payment of additional educational and professional development reimbursement beyond the maximum payment for employees who are seeking formal degrees. g) [Article 16.0: Retirement]
The City contracts with the Public Employees’ Retirement System for administration of the retirement program. Coverage for regular full-time employees is as follows:
i. [Retirement Formula]
1) Miscellaneous Employees
Unit members (and not “new members as defined by the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 - PEPRA) are covered bythe
2.5% @ 55 formula provided for by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law at Government Code section 21354.4.
Unit members who are defined as “new members” under the PEPRA, are covered by the 2%@ 62 formula provided for by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law at Government Code section 7522.20(a). 2) Safety Employees
Unit members (and not “new members as defined by the PEPRA) are covered by the 3% @ 55 formula provided for by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law at Government Code section 21363.1.
Unit members who are defined as “new members” under the PEPRA, are covered by the 2.7% @ 57 formula provided for by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law at Government Code section 7522.25(d). ii. [Employee Contributions to the Retirement System]
1) Miscellaneous Employees subject to the 2.5%@55 Formula pay the eight percent (8%) member contribution.
2) Miscellaneous Employees subject to the 2%@62 Formula pay the statutorily mandated employee contribution rate of one half of the total normal cost as determined each year by CalPERS in its annual valuation report. 3) Safety Employees subject to the 3%@55 Formula pay the nine percent (9%) member contribution.
In addition to the nine percent (9%) of compensation earnable employee-paid member contribution noted above, these employees shall pay an additional four percent (4%) of compensation earnable of the required employer 60 61 of 462
-11- Reso. #
contribution as cost sharing per Government Code section 20516(f) for a total of thirteen percent (13%) of compensation earnable for retirement contributions.
4) Safety Employees subject to the 2.7%@57 Formula pay the statutorily mandated employee contribution rate of one half of the total normal cost as determined each year by CalPERS in its annual valuation report.
These employees shall also pay an additional two percent (2.0%) of compensation earnable of the required employer contribution as cost sharing per Government Code section 20516(f).
iii. [Optional Benefits]
In addition to the retirement formula provided above, the following optional benefits are in effect: One Year Final Compensation, Service Credit for Unused Sick Leave and the 1959 Survivors Benefit Level IV (employees pay the employee contribution for this benefit). For employees defined as new members by the PEPRA, their retirement will not be calculated by the One Year Final Compensation provision, but rather, based on the three (3) year average compensation as provided for in the PEPRA at Government Code section 7522.32(a).
h) [Article 17.0 (exclusive of Sections 17.7, 17.9, and 17.10): Medical Benefits] All regular full-time employees are eligible for enrollment in the medical, vision and dental benefit plans as outlined below..
i. [17.1 Rates: ]
The City will pay 100% of the cost of medical care coverage for the employee, 90% of the cost for employee plus one dependent, and 90% of the cost of the employee plus two or more dependents, with the employee responsible for the remaining 10%. See below for maximum contribution amount. The City may alter the above percentages with appropriate notice to Management Classification Employees.
ii. [17.2 City Contribution Maximum: ]
Employees of the City have a two-tier medical system that exists for purposes of determining the City’s contribution to employee medical insurance. The City’s contribution to any employee’s medical insurance premium under the premium sharing formula contained above shall be limited to the amount of the contribution under the above premium sharing formula for the HMO plan rate for an employee plus two or more dependents, regardless of the employee’s choice of medical plan. iii. [17.3 Medical coverage for domestic partners:]
Medical coverage shall be provided for domestic partners. Dental coverage shall be provided to domestic partners under the same terms as other dependents. 61 62 of 462
-12- Reso. #
iv. [17.4 Medical Insurance Waiver: Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act (ACA)] Employer Mandate “affordability” determination, an Eligible Opt-Out Arrangement requires the following for employees who opt-out of employerprovided health coverage and receive cash in lieu:
a. Employee must provide reasonable evidence that the employee and each member of the employee’s expected tax family (individuals the employee expects to claim personal exemption deduction) have or will have minimum essential coverage (other than coverage in the individual market, whether or not obtained through Covered California) during the period of coverage to which the opt-out arrangement applies;
b. The opt-out payment may not be made if the employer knows or has reason to know that the employee or any other member of the employee’s expected tax family does not have or will not have the alternative coverage; c. The evidence of alternative coverage must be provided every plan year to which the eligible opt-out arrangement applies; and d. The reasonable evidence must be provided no earlier than a reasonable period of time before the plan year begins. Employee’s who opt out of participation in the City’s plan and will be paid 60% of the HMO employee only rate. This payment will be made to the employee on a biweekly basis as a part of the employee’s payroll check. v. [17.5 Flexible Spending Plan:]
The City will make a flexible spending plan available to employees pursuant to IRS Code Section 125 to allow an employee to contribute a portion of their income each year on a pre-tax basis into an account from which they may receive reimbursement for medical, dental and child care expenses. vi. [17.6 Medical Plan Coverage for Retirees: [
Employees hired before July 1, 2013: The option of continuing membership in the City's medical plan shall be available to employees who retire from employment with the City after a minimum of three years of service. The employee shall be responsible for the entire premium. Employees hired on or after July 1, 2013: The option of continuing membership in the City’s medical plan shall be available to employees who retire from employment with the City after a minimum of ten years of service. The employee shall be responsible for the entire premium.
Retirees will be eligible to participate in the same plan as current employees. vii. 17.8 Retirement Health Savings Plan:
All Management Classification Employees are required to participate in the City’s Retirement Health Savings Plan (RHS). The City, will make a pre-tax contribution of $100.00 per month to the RHS plan on each employee’s behalf, paid at $46.16 per pay period.
62 63 of 462
-13- Reso. #
i) [Article 18.0: Life Insurance]
All regular full-time employees are covered by a $50,000 Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment policy.
j) [Article 19.0: Long Term Disability]
All regular full-time employees are eligible for long term disability insurance coverage of 60% of the first $5,000 of salary after a sixty-calendar day elimination period. Employees are eligible for coverage after sixty days of employment. k) [Article 20.0: Uniform and Safety Footwear Policy] – The following provision on Uniforms is effective July 1, 2022.
Employees may be required to wear uniforms provided by the City or provide appropriate work attire for themselves. Positions or classifications required to wear uniform will be provided a uniform allowance of $450 each fiscal year. To the extent permitted by law, the value of the uniform allowance provided above is special compensation for “classic member” employees and shall be reported to CalPERS as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(3). This pay shall not be reported for “new members” as defined under PEPRA. However, it is ultimately CalPERS who determines whether any form of pay is reportable special compensation.
The City shall provide a maximum reimbursement of $300 per fiscal year to all unit employees who are required to wear safety footwear such as steel-toed, oil and slip resistant soles, or other type of safety shoes, as approved by the. The City will provide appropriate personal protective equipment when deemed necessary for safety purposes. l) [Article 21.0: Mileage]
The reimbursement rate for use of personal vehicles for City business shall be the standard mileage rate allowed by the Internal Revenue Service.
m) [Article 22.0: Military Leave]
Military leave shall be granted in accordance with the provisions of state and federal law.
All employees entitled to military leave shall give the City Manager an opportunity within the limits of military regulations to determine when such leave shall be taken. n) [Article 23.0: Jury Duty]
Employees in the unit are entitled to up to one hundred and twenty (120) hours of paid time off each calendar year for jury duty. An employee accepted for jury duty shall immediately notify their department head and/or City Manager in writing.
Employees who are on jury duty are required to return to work if released by the Court from jury duty and they have at least four hours of work left in their day. In addition, if an employee calls into the court on the day before reporting for jury duty and finds out that they must report to jury duty the next day, the employee is required to notify their 63 64 of 462
-14- Reso. #
department head prior to the start time of their work shift. o) [Article 24.0 (exclusive of Section 24.3): Exceptional Performance Pay Plan] The following provisions on Exceptional Performance Pay are effective July 1, 2022.
In accordance with administrative guidelines, an employee performance evaluation report and a performance pay plan justification shall be prepared and submitted to the City Manager with all recommendations for performance pay bonus for employees whose performance merits such an increase.
i. [24.1 Lump Sum Bonus:]
A lump sum bonus may be any amount up to 5% of gross annual salary for employees whose performance merits such pay based on the employees’ superior performance.
ii. [24.2 Distribution of Exceptional Performance Pay]
Management Classification Employees will be assessed fairly and should all have the same ability to earn this pay based on their respective performance.
The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, exceptional performance pay is special compensation as an annual performance bonus and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2, CCR 571(a)(1) for employees who are not new members per PEPRA (Bonus). This shall not be reported for new members. A system is in place to plan and identify performance goals and objectives. p) [Article 26.0: Alternate Work Schedule]
The City may assign any positions to a 4/10, 9/80, 5/8 or other work schedule as may suit the operational needs of the City.
iii. [26.1 9/80 Work Schedule Defined:]
The 9/80 work schedule shall be defined as an employee working 9 days for a total of eighty (80) hours in a two week pay period by working 8 days at 9 hours per day and working 1 day for 8 hours on Friday.
The workweek for employees on the 9/80 shall begin exactly four hours after the start time of the employee’s shift on their alternating regular day off (e.g., Friday).
SECTION 4: Additional Benefits
In addition to those policies and benefits set forth in Section 3, above, the following shall be provided for the benefit of the Management Classification Employees:
• Administrative Leave: Up to ninety (90) hours of Administrative Leave per fiscal year, as determined by the City Manager, in recognition of the additional scheduling demands that result from participation in City administration and public meetings. 64 65 of 462
-15- Reso. #
Employees appointed into a management-level position after July 1, 2024, shall not have the ability to convert, carry over or cash out any remaining balance, and any unused hours will expire at the end of the fiscal year (June 30) or upon separation. • Physical Exam: Reimbursement up to $300 per calendar year for expenses incurred for a general examination to determine physical fitness. • Deferred Compensation: City-paid contribution of two percent (2%) of base salary toward a Deferred Compensation Program.
• Automobile Allowance: For any Management Classification Employees not otherwise provided a City vehicle, the City shall provide an automobile allowance of Four Hundred ($400) dollars per month for Directors, and Two Hundred dollars ($200) per month for Deputy Directors or Managers as previously approved, or as otherwise deemed necessary for the performance of job duties, by the City Manager. • Cell Phone Stipend: Eighty dollars ($80) per month.
• Internet Stipend: Fifty dollars ($50) per month.
• One Shopper Parking Permit: Annual City Paid Laguna Beach Parking Permit. • Educational Incentive: Effective July 1, 2022, the City offers the following educational incentives to the following classifications. The City has determined that the following degrees and certificates enhance the classifications’ ability to perform their job. To the extent permitted by law, the following is special compensation and shall be reported as such (for classic and new members) pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(2) and Section 571.1(b)(2) Educational Incentive Pay. However, it is ultimately CalPERS who determines whether any form of pay is reportable special compensation.
o Deputy Fire Chief:
2.5% of base pay for obtaining and maintaining a Chief Officer Certificate.
2.5% of base pay for possession of a Bachelor’s’ Degree. 2.5% of base pay for possession of a Master’s Degree. o Chief of Marine Safety
2.5% of base pay for a Bachelor’s Degree.
o Police Chief and Fire Chief:
2.5% of base pay for possession of a Bachelor’s Degree 2.5% of base pay for possesson of a Management POST Certification o Fire Chief:
2.5% of base pay for a Bachelor’s Degree
2.5% of base pay for a Chief Officer Certification
65 66 of 462
-16- Reso. #
SECTION 5: Severance
In the event an employee covered by this Resolution (i.e., a Management Classification Employee) is terminated from employment, the City Manager may, in its sole and absolute discretion, authorize severance pay up of at least three (3) months up to a maximum of six (6) months of base pay and health insurance coverage (medical, dental and vision), provided that such terminated Management Classification Employee timely executes and delivers to the City an original Separation and General Release, in a form approved by the City Attorney, and does not thereafter timely exercise his, her, or their right to revoke said Separation Agreement and General Release. Any severance provided must be reimbursed to the City if such Management Classification Employee is convicted of a crime involving abuse of his, her, or their position, as defined in Government Code section 53243.4.
66 67 of 462
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date:
April 14, 2026
NON APPEAL
21 SUBJECT: 600 BUENA VISTA WAY: CONSIDERATION OF A GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT TO AMEND
THE OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT TO REMOVE A
DESIGNATED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR
WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP AND FINDING THE ACTION
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
UNDER STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Adopt the Resolution titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 25-2345 AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT 25-2369, AMENDING THE CITY’S
OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT TO REMOVE A DESIGNATED
SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP LOCATED AT AND AROUND 600 BUENA VISTA WAY;
REQUESTING SUCH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT CERTIFICATION BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION; AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)”; and
2. Find that the proposed adoption of the proposed amendment to the General Plan and Local Coastal Program is exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act under section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
SUMMARY OF THE MATTER
The applicant, Larry Nokes (“Applicant”), representative for property owners Susan Heystee and Davis Cozzens of 600 Buena Vista Way seeks City Council adoption of General Plan Amendment (“GPA”) 25- 2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment (“LCPA”) 25-2369, amending the Open Space and Conservation Element to remove a mapped significant natural watercourse from the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map, originally adopted by the City Council on May 1, 1984, by Resolution No. 84.37 (the “Project”). Proposals to add or delete watercourses from the environmentally sensitive areas map require review by the Planning Commission. (Laguna Beach Municipal Code Section 25.50.030(B).) On March 4, 2026, the Planning Commission voted 4-0-1 (Commissioner Kellenberg recused) to find that the at-issue mapped significant natural watercourse no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic, or ecological purpose and to recommend that the City Council approve GPA 25-2345 and LCPA 25-2369 to remove a mapped significant natural watercourse from the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map. The City Council is being asked to adopt GPA 25-2345 and LCPA 25-2369, which will not become effective until it is certified by the California Coastal Commission.
1 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
DISCUSSION
The property where the mapped significant water course is located is near 600 Buena Vista at the northerly terminus of Buena Vista Way, bordered by natural slopes to the north and east and by existing homes to the south and southwest (the “Property”). To the west, the site overlooks the northerly terminus of the Temple Hills Drive cul-de-sac. The parcel drops approximately 170 feet from its highest point on the eastern end to its lowest point near Temple Hills Drive.
Figures 1 and 2 – Existing Project street frontage (left) and location map with mapped watercourse depicted (right)
The only change proposed for the Property is the removal of a mapped significant natural watercourse across the lower portion of the site from the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map (Figure 1). To support this request, the Applicant submitted a Hydrology Study and Biological Resources Review (Attachments 4 and 5, respectively). Both reports were peer-reviewed by the City’s third-party consultants, who confirmed the analyses and findings. 2 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
Figure 3 – Proposed Map Change to Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses The Hydrology Study, prepared by registered civil engineer Caleb Rios with Toal Engineering, Inc. and dated October 23, 2025, concluded that all existing and proposed upstream tributary areas to the mapped drainage are currently captured by drain inlets and pipes and discharged to Temple Hills Drive or have historically flowed down Buena Vista Way. Mr. Rios observes in his report that “all runoff from the hills above the project site, including that portion, which was previously tributary to the existing watercourse, is all being collecting in 8” and 10” storm drain pipes and discharged to the concrete swale below at Temple Hills Drive. After construction (of the approved residence and associated site improvements), no runoff from the project site, or from the hills above, will be directed towards the watercourse.” As such, the report found that the mapped watercourse “no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic, or ecological purpose.” Staff’s review of 3D imagery of the Property and the terrain above it supports Mr. Rios’ conclusions. As demonstrated by the image below, there is an existing depression consistent with the mapped watercourse location. This could suggest that the watercourse may have once been active. However, due to the development of this area with single-family residences and public streets that have been terraced (cut) into the hillside, much of the water runoff from upstream areas appears to be conveyed through the local street network into receiving drain inlets.
3 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
Figure 4 – Oblique view of the mapped watercourse, looking south/southwest The Biological Resources Review, prepared by LSA and dated October 21, 2024, found that “no wetlands, drainage features, or riparian habitat areas were recorded on the property during the site survey, and the project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor.” Watercourse Deletion Regulations
LBMC Section 25.50.030(B) provides that a “significant watercourse can be deleted only if it is determined that it no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose.” Subsection (A) provides a definition for the two categories of significant watercourses:
“Significant watercourses are those which are depicted on the city's environmentally sensitive areas map. Significant watercourses include significant natural watercourses and significant modified watercourses.
(1) "Significant natural watercourses" are those that are in their natural condition and which serve a distinct functional scenic or ecological purpose. As applied, ecological purposes include those related to wildlife habitats, particularly feeding, watering and breeding areas; and biotic habitat areas. Scenic purposes include those related to view corridors, density relief or general aesthetic appeal. Functional purposes include those related to hydrologic considerations.
4 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
(2) "Significant modified watercourses" are those that have been altered from their natural condition, but which continue to serve a distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose as set forth under subsection (A)(1). Significant modified watercourses include those that have been channelized, piped, culverted or otherwise improved or diverted. Significant modified watercourses are typified by the continuing presence of a topographic swale or depression and the ability to conduct overflow runoff. Significant modified watercourses that are restored may qualify for redesignation as natural watercourses.” The at issue mapped feature would fall within the first category of a “significant natural watercourse” because it has not been altered through the construction of an on-site storm drain, culvert, channelization, or other drainage improvement. However, peer-reviewed biological and hydrological reports demonstrate that, despite its mapped designation, the feature does not serve a distinct functional, scenic, or ecological purpose. Based on the technical studies submitted by the Applicant, the significant natural watercourse identified on the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map meets the criteria for deletion.
Functional (Hydrologic) Purpose
In accordance with LBMC Section 25.50.030(A)(1), functional purposes include those related to hydrologic considerations. The Hydrology Study, prepared by Toal Engineering, Inc. and dated October 23, 2025, concluded that all existing and proposed upstream tributary areas to the mapped drainage are currently intercepted by drain inlets and underground pipes and discharged to Temple Hills Drive, or have historically flowed down Buena Vista Way. The report noted that “all runoff from the hills above the project site, including that portion, which was previously tributary to the existing watercourse, is all being collecting in 8” and 10” storm drain pipes and discharged to the concrete swale below at Temple Hills Drive. After construction (of the approved residence and associated site improvements), no runoff from the project site, or from the hills above, will be directed towards the watercourse.” As such, the report found that the mapped watercourse “no longer serves a distinct functional purpose.” Ecological Purpose
In accordance with LBMC Section 25.50.030(A)(1), ecological purposes include those related to wildlife habitats, particularly feeding, watering and breeding areas; and biotic habitat areas. The Biological Resources Review, prepared by LSA and dated October 21, 2024, found that no wetlands, drainage features, or riparian habitat areas were present on the property during the site survey. Furthermore, there were no special status plant or animal species observed during the biologist’s survey of the Property. The site will be developed with a new single-family residence in accordance with prior approvals, and the Hydrology Study found that the area of the mapped watercourse will not collect or convey stormwater runoff. For these reasons, the area of the mapped significant natural watercourse does not provide significant wildlife habitat value, such as feeding, watering, or breeding area. The review further determined that the Project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. Therefore, the property does not provide ecological value in the form of wildlife habitat, biotic habitat areas, feeding or breeding areas, or wildlife movement pathways.
As such, the watercourse does not serve a distinct ecological purpose. 5 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
Scenic Purpose
In accordance with LBMC Section 25.50.030(A)(1), scenic purposes include those related to view corridors, density relief, or general aesthetic appeal. The Hydrology Study, prepared by Toal Engineering, Inc. and dated October 23, 2025, describes the project site as located within an established residential neighborhood where surrounding properties are developed with single-family homes and associated improvements, including paved roadways (Temple Hills Drive and Buena Vista Way), curb, gutter, and storm drain infrastructure. The presence of built residential structures and public infrastructure establishes that the site exists within a developed residential context rather than an open space or visually prominent natural setting.
Furthermore, because water in the area is generally conveyed through streets and subsurface infrastructure rather than through a visible, naturalized channel traversing the Project site, this feature lacks the characteristics typically associated with scenic waterways, such as a defined channel, natural banks, or visible flowing water. Given the developed residential surroundings and associated drainage improvements and the lack of riparian vegetation, the mapped drainage area does not provide general aesthetic appeal.
Additionally, the mapped watercourse does not provide a view corridor. The mapped watercourse is a steeply sloping depression. The scenic components of the visual scene generally consist of views of the undeveloped hillsides in the distance, across Park Avenue to the north. Due to the topography of the site and its surroundings, views of these features are taken over and across the mapped watercourse. The watercourse itself does not allow for these views.
Finally, the mapped watercourse does not provide density relief. The Property is located in the R/HP, Residential/Hillside Protection zone, which is intended for single-family use. The Property consists of a single lot that is a legal building site and is currently being developed with a single-family residence.
Moreover, the portion of the site encumbered by the mapped watercourse is protected from development because Policy 14J of the Open Space and Conservation Element requires that all developed R/HP properties provide a permanent open space easement over any portion of the site not used for physical development or associated services, in order to promote the long-term preservation of these lands. The policy further specifies that only uses consistent with the open space designation are permitted within the easement area.
The subject property is already encumbered by a recorded open space easement established in 2006. In addition, the 2024 Design Review approval for the project includes Condition of Approval No. 16, which requires the dedication of all areas of the property located below the 332-foot contour line as open space prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the approved entitlements. The area of the mapped watercourse is below the 332-foot contour line and is therefore subject to the restrictions of Condition of Approval No. 16 and the open space easement.
Watercourse Deletion Criteria – Conclusion
Based on the technical evidence provided, the mapped significant natural watercourse does not serve ecological, scenic, or functional purposes as defined in the City’s regulations. Accordingly, this watercourse meets the City’s criteria for deletion from the City’s Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map. 6 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
General Plan Amendment
Government Code § 65300.5 mandates that general plan elements, and parts thereof, be integrated, internally consistent, and include a compatible statement of policies for the adopting agency. Staff has confirmed that the proposed update to the mapped watercourses in the Open Space and Conservation Element is consistent with the General Plan, including the goals and policies of the Land Use Element and Open Space and Conservation Element. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable General Plan policies because it would not induce growth on the City’s hillside open space lands, would not affect recreational opportunities, and would not interfere with public views of undeveloped hillsides. In addition, removing this mapped feature from the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map would not change the City’s requirement to provide dedicated open space over the area currently shown as a mapped watercourse.
Land Use Element Policy 7.1 Protect dedicated and accepted open space.
Open Space and Conservation Element Policy 6-H Preserve a continuous open space corridor within the hillsides in order to preserve natural resources and recreational opportunities.
Local Coastal Program Amendment
The City’s Local Coastal Program (“LCP”) was certified by the California Coastal Commission on January 13, 1993, granting the City permitting authority within the Coastal Zone. The LCP is not a single standalone document; rather, it is composed of selected General Plan elements, specific plans, municipal code provisions, guidelines, maps, and resolutions. Because the proposed General Plan Amendment must remain consistent with all components of the City’s certified LCP, a corresponding LCP Amendment is also required.
The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt GPA 25-2345 and LCPA 25-2369 to reflect the following modification to the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map in the OSCE:
(See Attachment 1 [City Council Resolution].)
7 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The recommended action has no financial impact to the budget.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section and 15061(b)(3). Here, the Project is limited to an update to the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses Map in City’s Open Space and Conservation Element as the significant natural watercourse no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose. Further, none of the exceptions outlined in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply.
The project site does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas in that the site is fully developed with an existing residential use, is surrounded on all sides by public streets and developed properties. While the City’s environmentally sensitive areas maps do indicate that an earthquake fault exists on the project site, the proposed project involves no physical change and therefore, has no potential to result in a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, the deletion of the watercourse from the property will not induce development on the property as this area of the property is restricted as dedicated open space under the original project entitlements. There will be no cumulative impact resulting from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, as the current request is limited in nature to the watercourse mapped through the property. There are no unusual circumstances resulting in a significant impact on the environment. There will be no damage to scenic resources, including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. The Project is not located on a hazardous waste site or any other site included on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. The Project will not result in significant adverse impacts to historical resources as defined by CEQA because there are no historic resources on the subject property and none in the Project vicinity that would be impacted by the proposed improvements. As the Project has no potential to cause a significant environmental effect, the exemption applies and no further environmental analysis is required under CEQA.
ATTACHMENTS
1. City Council Resolution (Pgs. 10-19)
2. March 4, 2026 Planning Commission Report (Pgs. 20-26)
3. Application (Pgs. 27-41)
4. Hydrology Study and Site Plan (Pgs. 42-97)
5. Biological Resources Review (Pgs. 98-106)
6. March 4, 2026 Planning Commission Public Comments (Pgs. 107-131)
7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-2345 (Pgs. 132-139) Submitted By: Matthew Schneider Approved: .David A Kiff Matthew Schneider, Director of
Community Development
Dave Kiff, City Manager
8 of 262
REQUEST TO DELETE A MAPPED SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP – 600 BUENA VISTA WAY April 14, 2026
Report Prepared By: Coordinated With:
Shaveta Sharma, Senior Planner Jane Abzug, Assistant City Attorney Anthony Viera, Deputy Director of Community
Development
9 of 262
RESOLUTION NO. 26.XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 25-2345 AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
AMENDMENT 25-2369, AMENDING THE CITY’S OPEN SPACE
AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT TO REMOVE A DESIGNATED
SIGNIFICANT NATURAL WATERCOURSE FROM THE MAJOR
WATERSHEDS AND DRAINAGE COURSES MAP LOCATED AT
AND AROUND 600 BUENA VISTA WAY; REQUESTING SUCH
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT CERTIFICATION
BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION; AND FINDING
THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
WHEREAS, State law requires the City of Laguna Beach (“City”) to adopt and maintain a general plan that contains certain mandatory elements, describes the City’s long-term goals, and develops policies and programs to achieve those goals; and WHEREAS, two of the mandatory elements of a general plan is the open space element and conservation element, pursuant to Government Code section 65302(d) and Government Code Section 65560; and
WHEREAS, the Open Space and Conservation Element and Title 25 of the Laguna Beach Municipal Code (“LBMC”) are both components of the City’s certified Local Coastal Program under the California Coastal Act; and
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2025, an application was filed by the owner of property located at 600 Buena Vista Way (“Applicant”) requesting an amendment to the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element and specifically the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses Map to delete a mapped significant natural watercourse at and around 600 Buena Vista Way in the R/HP (Residential Hillside Protection) zone (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to LBMC Section 25.50.030(B), a proposal to delete a significant water course must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, after notice in accordance with Attachment 1
10 10 of 262
-2- Reso. #26.XXX
LBMC Sections 25.05.065 and 25.07.026, and can only be accomplished if it is determined that the significant watercourse no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic, or ecological purpose; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to LBMC Section 25.50.030(A)(1), ecological purposes include those related to wildlife habitats, particularly feeding, watering, and breeding areas, and biotic habitat areas; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to LBMC Section 25.50.030(A)(1), scenic purposes include those related to view corridors, density relief, or general aesthetic appeal; and WHEREAS, pursuant to LBMC Section 25.50.030(A)(1), functional purposes include those related to hydrologic considerations; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on whether the proposed deletion of the mapped significant watercourse met the required findings pursuant to LBMC Section 50.50.030(B) and (A)(1); and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2026, the Planning Commission also held a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 25-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 25-2369, amending the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element to delete a designated significant natural watercourse located at and around 600 Buena Vista Way and specifically the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation to approve General Plan Amendment 25- 2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 25-2369, and the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council at the public hearing on the General Plan Amendment 25-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 25-2369; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been satisfied.
11 11 of 262
-3- Reso. #26.XXX
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH DOES RESOLVE:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. The City Council makes the following findings with regard to the amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City’s General Plan as provided in Government Code Section 65350 et seq.:
A. The Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element and has recommended action on the Open Space and Conservation Element through the adoption of Resolution No. 25-2345 in accordance with Government Code Section 65353.
B. The City Council has held at least one public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element and is taking action on the proposed amendment through adoption of this Resolution in accordance with Government Code Section 65356(a).
C. The amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element is consistent with other elements of the City’s General Plan (Government Code Section 65300.5), including but not limited to:
i. Land Use Element: The proposed amendment is consistent with the following General Plan policies in that the amendment would not induce growth on the City’s hillside open space lands. In addition, removing this mapped feature from the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map would not change the City’s requirement to provide dedicated open space over the area currently shown as a mapped watercourse.
Policy 7.1 Protect dedicated and accepted open space.
ii. Open Space and Conservation Element: The proposed amendment is consistent 12 12 of 262
-4- Reso. #26.XXX
with the following General Plan policies in that the amendment would not induce growth on the City’s hillside open space lands, would not affect recreational opportunities, and would not interfere with public views of undeveloped hillsides. In addition, removing this mapped feature from the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map would not change the City’s requirement to provide dedicated open space over the area currently shown as a mapped watercourse.
Policy 6-H Preserve a continuous open space corridor within the hillsides in order to preserve natural resources and recreational opportunities.
SECTION 3. The City Council makes the following findings with regard to the amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element, which is part of the City’s certified Local Coastal Program, pursuant to Laguna Beach Municipal Code Section 25.07.026:
A. The Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element, which is part of the City’s Local Coastal Program, and has recommended action on the Open Space and Conservation Element through the adoption of Resolution No. 25-2345 in accordance with LBMC Section 25.07.026(B).
B. The City Council has held at least one public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element and will take action on the proposed amendment through adoption of this Resolution in accordance with LBMC Section 25.07.026(C).
C. The amendment to the Open Space and Conservation Element is consistent with the remainder of the City’s Local Coastal Program for the following reasons:
i. Coastal Land Use Plan Technical Appendix. This LCPA is consistent with all applicable provisions of the City of Laguna Beach Coastal Land Use Plan Technical Appendix, as incorporated in the certified Local Coastal Program (“LCP”). The Technical Appendix, adopted as a component of the LCP, provides background data, resource inventories, mapping, and technical standards that 13 13 of 262
-5- Reso. #26.XXX
support the policies of the certified Coastal Land Use Plan and related elements of the General Plan (e.g., Open Space/Conservation Element, Land Use Element, and Landscape and Scenic Highways Element), and guides implementation of the City’s coastal policies. The proposed LCPA does not alter, degrade, or conflict with these underlying resource definitions, technical standards, or mapped resource areas. The proposed amendment maintains and reinforces LCP standards addressing resource protection, including those related to biological and geological constraints identified in the Technical Appendix. An amendment that is internally consistent with the certified Land Use Plan and Implementation Plan is therefore consistent with the Technical Appendix.
ii. Land Use Element. This LCPA is consistent with the following Land Use Element policies in that the amendment would not induce growth on the City’s hillside open space lands. The deletion of the watercourse from the property will not induce development as that area of the property is dedicated open space as a condition of approval in the entitlements for development of the property.
Policy 7.1 Protect dedicated and accepted open space.
SECTION 4. The Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that an activity is covered by the common sense exemption under CEQA where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment and therefore the activity is not subject to CEQA. Here, the Project is limited to an update to the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses Map in City’s Open Space and Conservation Element as the significant natural watercourse no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose. Further, none of the exceptions outlined in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The project site does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas in that the site is fully developed with an existing residential use, is surrounded on all sides by public streets and developed properties. While the City’s environmentally sensitive areas maps 14 14 of 262
-6- Reso. #26.XXX
do indicate that an earthquake fault exists on the project site, the proposed project involves no physical change and therefore, has no potential to result in a significant effect on the environment.
Additionally, the deletion of the watercourse from the property will not induce development on the property as this area of the property is restricted as dedicated open space under the original project entitlements. There will be no cumulative impact resulting from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, as the current request is limited in nature to the watercourse mapped through the property. There are no unusual circumstances resulting in a significant impact on the environment. There will be no damage to scenic resources, including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. The Project is not located on a hazardous waste site or any other site included on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. The Project will not result in significant adverse impacts to historical resources as defined by CEQA because there are no historic resources on the subject property and none in the Project vicinity that would be impacted by the proposed improvements. As the Project has no potential to cause a significant environmental effect, the exemption applies and no further environmental analysis is required under CEQA.
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 25-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 25-2369 to amend the Open Space and Conservation Element and specifically the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses Map to delete a mapped significant natural watercourse at and around 600 Buena Vista Way in the R/HP (Residential Hillside Protection) zone as reflected in Exhibit A-1, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and repealing and replacing the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses Map with the map in Exhibit A-2, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, subject to the following conditions of approval:
A. General Plan Amendment 25-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 25- 15 15 of 262
-7- Reso. #26.XXX
2369 shall not become operative and effective unless and until the California Coastal Commission and the City take all actions necessary to finally certify Local Coastal Program Amendment 25- 2369.
B. Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Laguna Beach and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Laguna Beach, its officers, employees, or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Laguna Beach concerning this Project, including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, Design Review Board, Community Development Director, or City Planner relating to the Project, including the City’s significant watercourse deletion process and findings under Laguna Beach Municipal Code Section
25.50.030. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the Project and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby requests that the California Coastal Commission consider, approve, and certify LCP Amendment 25-2369 to amend the Open Space and Conservation Element, as further set forth in Exhibits “A-1 and A-2” attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference, in accordance with LBMC Section 25.07.026(E). The City Council hereby acknowledges that, if the California Coastal Commission certifies the amendment without any suggested modifications, the amendment is effective immediately pursuant to 14 CCR Section 13544(b). If the California Coastal Commission conditionally certifies the amendment with suggested modifications, however, the amendment is effective upon the City’s acknowledgment of receipt of the California Coastal Commission’s action, the City’s acceptance and agreement to any such terms and modifications, and the City’s final action to satisfy the terms and modifications pursuant to 14 CCR Section 13544(c). 16 16 of 262
-8- Reso. #26.XXX
SECTION 7. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at City Hall, 505 Forest Avenue Laguna Beach, CA 92651. The custodian of the record of proceedings is the Director of Community Development.
ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026.
Mark Orgill, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ann Marie McKay, City Clerk
I, Ann Marie McKay, City Clerk of the City of Laguna Beach, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26.XXX was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on April 14, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk, City of Laguna Beach, California
17 17 of 262
-9- Reso. #26.XXX
Exhibit A-1
Amendment to Major Watersheds & Drainage Course Map
Locator Map:
Existing Proposed
18 18 of 262
-10- Reso. #26.XXX
Exhibit A-2
Major Watersheds & Drainage Course Map as amended by GPA 25-2345 / LCPA 25-2369 19 19 of 262
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
February 18, 2026
Agenda Item No. 5.1
Case No: General Plan Amendment 2025-2345
Local Coastal Program Amendment 2025-2369
Request General Plan Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment to remove a designated significant natural watercourse from the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map.
Project Location: 600 Buena Vista Way | APN: 641-373-43 Applicant: Larry Nokes
(949) 376-3500 | [email protected]
Property Owner: Susan Heystee and Davis Cozzens
Prepared By: Community Development Department
Shaveta Sharma, Senior Planner
(949) 715-0954 | [email protected]
CEQA:
The project qualifies for an exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as it involves no physical change and therefore, has no potential to result in a significant effect on the environment.
Recommendation:
Conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 25-2345 (Attachment 1), recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 2025-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 2025-2369 to remove a designated significant natural watercourse from the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map.
Planning Commissioners
within a 500’ Radius: Kellenberg
Attachment 2
20 20 of 262
PC Staff Report
March 4, 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant, Larry Nokes, requests that the Planning Commission review the proposal and recommend City Council adoption of General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2025-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) 2025-2369 to remove a mapped significant natural watercourse from the Open Space Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map, originally adopted by the City Council on May 1, 1984 by Resolution No. 84.37.
BACKGROUND:
General Location: 600 Buena Vista Way
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 641-373-43
Environmental Determination: CEQA Section 15061(b)(3)
Related Cases: DR 04-276, CDP 04-54, DR 05-035, DR 18-1280, CDP 18- 1281, DR 24-2039, CDP 24-2040, and VAR 24-2340
Existing General Plan Land
Use Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Use of Property:
Residential / Hillside Protection
R/HP Residential Hillside Protection
Residential
Surrounding General Plan Land Uses Designations, Zoning Districts, and Use of Properties:
Direction General Plan Land Use Zoning Use
North Residential / Hillside
Protection
R/HP Residential
Hillside Protection
Residential
South Residential / Hillside
Protection
R/HP Residential
Hillside Protection
Residential
East Residential / Hillside
Protection
R/HP Residential
Hillside Protection
Residential
West Residential / Hillside
Protection
R/HP Residential
Hillside Protection
Residential
21 21 of 262
PC Staff Report
March 4, 2026
Existing Project Street Frontage Location Map
BACKGROUND
The Open Space and Conservation Element was adopted by the City Council on May 1, 1984, by Resolution 84.37. The Open Space and Conservation Element identifies strategies for preserving open space lands, discouraging premature conversion of such lands to urban uses, providing for orderly growth and development, and conserving natural resources. The City combined the required Open Space and Conservation Elements into a single document, which also addresses issues related to the City’s coastal and hillside settings, extensive hillside open space, associated natural features, and environmental hazards.
The subject property has a history of entitlements for construction of a single-family residence and related improvements dating back to 2004. The most recent approval, granted on December 12, 2024, authorized additions to the residence, grading, and a variance for height and allowable lot coverage. The deletion of the watercourse from the property will not induce development on the property as this area of the property is restricted as dedicated open space under the original project entitlements.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
The property is located at the northerly terminus of Buena Vista Way, bordered by natural slopes to the north and east and by existing homes to the south and southwest. To the west, the site overlooks the northerly terminus of the Temple Hills Drive cul-de-sac. The parcel drops approximately 170 feet from its highest point on the eastern end to its lowest point near Temple Hills Drive.
The only change proposed for the property is the removal of a mapped significant natural watercourse across the lower portion of the site from the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map (Figure 1). To support this request, the applicant submitted a Biological Resources Review and a Hydrology Study (Attachments 6 and 7). 22 22 of 262
PC Staff Report
March 4, 2026
Both reports were peer-reviewed by the City’s third-party consultants, who confirmed the analyses and findings.
Figure 1 – Proposed Map Change to Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses The Hydrology Study, prepared by Toal Engineering, Inc. and dated October 23, 2025, concluded that all existing and proposed upstream tributary areas to the mapped drainage are currently captured by drain inlets and pipes and discharged to Temple Hills Drive or have historically flowed down Buena Vista Way. The Biological Resources Review, prepared by LSA and dated October 21, 2024, found that “no wetlands, drainage features, or riparian habitat areas were recorded on the property during the site survey, and the project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor.”
LBMC 25.50.030(B) states:
“Demolition/Deletion Process. Proposals to add or delete watercourses from the environmentally sensitive areas map, or to change the status of significant watercourses shall be reviewed by the planning commission. Public notice shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 25.05.065 and 25.07.026. The planning commission shall make its determination based on its assessment of the watercourse as it relates to the criteria listed in subsection (A); provided, however, that a significant watercourse can be deleted only if it is determined that it no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose. The decision of the planning commission may be appealed to the city council pursuant to Section 25.05.070.” (emphasis added) Subsection (A) explains what is a “significant watercourse:” “Significant watercourses are those which are depicted on the city's environmentally sensitive areas map. Significant watercourses include significant natural watercourses and significant modified watercourses.
(1) "Significant natural watercourses" are those that are in their natural condition and which serve a distinct functional scenic or ecological purpose. As applied, 23 23 of 262
PC Staff Report
March 4, 2026
ecological purposes include those related to wildlife habitats, particularly feeding, watering and breeding areas; and biotic habitat areas. Scenic purposes include those related to view corridors, density relief or general aesthetic appeal.
Functional purposes include those related to hydrologic considerations. (2) "Significant modified watercourses" are those that have been altered from their natural condition, but which continue to serve a distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose as set forth under subsection (A)(1). Significant modified watercourses include those that have been channelized, piped, culverted or otherwise improved or diverted. Significant modified watercourses are typified by the continuing presence of a topographic swale or depression and the ability to conduct overflow runoff. Significant modified watercourses that are restored may qualify for redesignation as natural watercourses.”
Based on the studies submitted by the applicant, the significant natural watercourse identified in the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses map, meets the criteria for deletion of a watercourse.
The Hydrology Study, prepared by Toal Engineering, Inc. and dated October 23, 2025, concluded that all existing and proposed upstream tributary areas to the mapped drainage are currently captured by drain inlets and pipes and discharged to Temple Hills Drive or have historically flowed down Buena Vista Way. Therefore, the site does not function as a natural drainage course providing hydrologic or watershed-related benefits.
Additionally, the Biological Resources Review, prepared by LSA and dated October 21, 2024, found that no wetlands, drainage features, or riparian habitat areas were recorded on the property during the site survey, and the project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. As such, the property does not provide ecological value in the form of wildlife habitat, biotic habitat areas, or wildlife movement pathways. The existing mapped significant natural watercourse does not provide a scenic benefit within the developed residential context. This request is not associated with a development application that could affect views or scenic corridors.
Based on the technical evidence provided, the subject significant natural watercourse does not serve an ecological, scenic, or functional purposes as defined above. Accordingly, the proposed project would not impair resources associated with wildlife habitat, hydrologic function, view corridors, density relief, or general aesthetic appeal.
General Plan Amendment
Government Code § 65300.5 mandates that general plan elements, and parts thereof, be integrated, internally consistent, and include a compatible statement of policies for the adopting agency. Staff has confirmed that the proposed update to the mapped watercourses in the Open Space Element is consistent with the General Plan, including the goals and policies of the Landscape and Scenic Highways Element (LSHE), Safety Element, and the Land Use Element. 24 24 of 262
PC Staff Report
March 4, 2026
Local Coastal Program Amendment
The City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP) was certified by the California Coastal Commission on January 13, 1993, granting the City permitting authority within the coastal zone. The LCP is not a single standalone document; rather, it is composed of selected General Plan elements, specific plans, municipal code provisions, guidelines, maps, and resolutions. Because the proposed General Plan Amendment must remain consistent with all components of the City’s certified LCP, a corresponding LCP Amendment is also required.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section and 15061(b)(3). Here, the Project is limited to an update to the Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses Map in City’s Open Space and Conservation Element as the significant natural watercourse no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose. Further, none of the exceptions outlined in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 apply. The project site is fully developed with an existing residential use and is surrounded by public streets and other developed properties, and it contains no environmentally sensitive areas beyond the mapped earthquake fault. Although the City’s environmentally sensitive areas maps identify a fault on the site, the proposed project involves no physical change and therefore has no potential to result in a significant effect on the environment.
The deletion of the watercourse from the property will not induce development on the property as this area of the property is restricted as dedicated open space under the original project entitlements. There will be no cumulative impact resulting from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, as the current request is limited in nature to the watercourse mapped through the property. There are no unusual circumstances resulting in a significant impact on the environment. There will be no damage to scenic resources, including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. The Project is not located on a hazardous waste site or any other site included on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. The Project will not result in significant adverse impacts to historical resources as defined by CEQA because there are no historic resources on the subject property and none in the Project vicinity that would be impacted by the proposed improvements. As the Project has no potential to cause a significant environmental effect, the exemption applies and no further environmental analysis is required under CEQA.
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, adopt Resolution No. 25-2345 (Attachment 1) recommending City Council adoption of General Plan Amendment 2025-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 2025-2669, and finding said action exempt from CEQA.
25 25 of 262
PC Staff Report
March 4, 2026
NOTIFICATION:
Pursuant to Title 25 (Zoning) Public Notice, a public hearing notice was mailed on February 4, 2026, in accordance with LBMC Section 25.05.065(D). In addition, a public hearing notice was posted on the project site on February 3, 2026, in accordance with LBMC Section 25.05.065(E). Further, a public hearing notice was published on February 6, 2026, in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with LBMC Section 25.05.065(F).
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 25-2344
Attachment 2 – Draft City Council Resolution for General Plan Amendment 2025-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment 2025-2669
Attachment 3 – Application
Attachment 4 – Site Plan
Attachment 5 – Biological Resources Review dated October 21, 2024, prepared by LSA Attachment 6 – Hydrology Study, dated October 23, 2025, prepared by Toal Engineering, Inc Attachment 7 – Open Space Element Major Watersheds and Drainage Courses Map Attachment 8 – Public Comments
26 26 of 262
ZPC #:
FLOOR
AREA
GARAGE
AREA
DECK
AREA
STORAGE
AREA
TOTAL
REMODEL
AREA
NO. OF
STORIES
EXISTING BUILDING
NEW CONSTRUCTION
TOTALS
Property Owner
Phone # Cell Phone #
Mailing Address City/St/Zip
Email Address Receive Project Updates by Email - Yes No Architect/Designer
Phone # Cell Phone #
Mailing Address City/St/Zip
Email Address
State License # Receive Project Updates by Email - Yes No Authorized Agent Phone #
Cell Phone # Mailing Address
City/St/Zip Email Address
State License # Receive Project Updates by Email - Yes No Please note that the applicant/agent will receive a U.S. Postal Service or Email notification of project updates, such as plan check results. In addition, all other development team members listed on this page will also receive project updates by email, including plan check results, unless indicated otherwise.
This will improve communication with the applicant’s team during the entitlement process.
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • 505 FOREST AVENUE • LAGUNA BEACH • CALIFORNIA • 92651
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS
LOT SIZE _______________________________ ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO.
DESCRIBE IN DETAIL SCOPE OF WORK
Attachment 3
27 600 Buena Vista Way 1.52 acres (66,211.2 sf) 641-373-43 Request by property owner to delete drainage course from the environmentally sensitive areas map (LBMC sections 25.50.030, 25.05.065, 25.07.026). The argument for deletion is set forth in Attachment A to this Application, and its Exhibits 1-8. David Cozzens and Susan Heystee c/o Laidlaw Schultz Architects (see below) Craig Schultz, AIA, Laidlaw Schultz Architects (949) 645-9982 3111 2nd Avenue, #1 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 [email protected] Laurence P. Nokes, Esq. (949) 235-3060 410 Broadway Street, Suite 200 Laguna Beach, CA 92651 [email protected] 27 of 262
28 28 of 262
ATTACHMENT A to Development Review Application | Page 1
ATTACHMENT A
TO APPLICATION TO REMOVE WATERCOURSE FROM MAP
600 Buena Vista Way, Laguna Beach, California
This Development Review Application seeks removal of a mapped watercourse on the 600 Buena Vista Way property. The watercourse, as mapped, clearly serves no functional, scenic or ecological purpose. The watercourse originates at 648 Canyon View Drive and descends over the 600 Buena Vista Way property, terminating at the Temple Hills cul-de-sac, next to the property at 528 Temple Hills Drive. (Exhibit 1 – City GIS Map.) Attached is a Hydrology Study prepared by Toal Engineering on November 10, 2024.
This report was submitted to the City in support of the December 12, 2024 DRB application, which was approved 5-0. The report is resubmitted with this Application. (Exhibit 2 – Hydrology Study.) A Cultural Resource Study was prepared for the project by PSOMAS on October 16, 2018. (Exhibit 3.) No cultural or ecological resources were found to exist on the site. LSA prepared a Vegetation Map and Biological Resources Review on October 21, 2024. (Exhibit 4.) As seen in the report, the area of the “watercourse” is characterized as “Developed or Disturbed,” “Ornamental Plantings,” “Ruderal,” and “Toyon-Sumac Chaparral”. According to the report, “Ruderal areas generally contain a high percentage of bare ground and occur at any site that has been disturbed by natural or human causes. Areas classified as ruderal within the project site consist of disturbed areas that appear to be maintained for fuel modification purposes.”
While this “watercourse” appears on the City’s environmentally sensitive areas map, this designated drainage conveyance is, and has been for decades, nothing but a dry gulch. This is evidenced by the attached studies, the development history of 528 Temple Hills Drive, and the development history of 600 Buena Vista Way.
528 Temple Hills Drive Development
While proposing development of a new project at 528 Temple Hills Drive on November 30, 2007, Mark Singer applied for a variance to encroach into the watercourse setback, arguing that the watercourse was “inactive.” The drawings attached to the application show a wall at the bottom of the watercourse that transects the watercourse. (Exhibit 5 – Mark Singer Letter dated November 30, 2007.) Singer’s variance justifications identify a wall adjacent to Temple Hills Drive, and clearly show the wall located across the watercourse and on the 600 Buena Vista Way property. On March 13, 2008, the DRB unanimously approved the application and granted the requested variance, approving this wall across the watercourse and on the 600 Buena Vista Way property as part of the 528 Temple Hills Drive application. This was done without notice to, or permission or consent of, the 600 Buena Vista Way owners. 29 29 of 262
ATTACHMENT A to Development Review Application | Page 2 In considering the development application for 528 Temple Hills Drive, this “watercourse” was never considered “significant” or “functional” or “scenic”, or of any ecological purpose, by the Planning Staff or the discretionary Design Review Board. 600 Buena Vista Way Development
Design Review for 600 Buena Vista Way was approved in March 2021. A revision brought the project back to the DRB in December 2024, necessitating the preparation of the Hydrology Study (attached as Exhibit 2). When the planning application was made in 2004 by a prior owner of 600 Buena Vista Way, no hydrology study was required by Staff. (Exhibit 6 - Nancy Csira’s Zoning Plan Check Checklist dated March 30, 2004.) When assessing a proposed fire turnaround that was to be constructed within the mapped watercourse, Steve May, Director of Public Works, determined that the street turnaround “…within a watercourse” was to be allowed as it would “…enhance public safety.” (Exhibit 7 – Memo from Steve May dated September 8, 2004.)
A look at the City GIS Map of the “watercourse” and inspection of the site tell the story.
The driveway leading from the end of Buena Vista Way to the building pad for 600 Buena Vista Way cuts directly across the “watercourse”. This same driveway has been in place for decades.
There is no drainpipe under the driveway that conveys water under the driveway from the upper section of the watercourse on 648 Canyon View Drive, to the lower section of the “watercourse” on 641 Canyon View (now 600 Buena Vista Way). There are no erosion marks across this dirt road at the “watercourse”, clearly proving that Mark Singer was correct, back in 2006, when he noted that the watercourse is “inactive.”
Area Development
The properties on Temple Hills Drive and Canyon View Drive have been developed over the decades, and water from developed parcels has obviously been dealt with in the development of those parcels. Drainage that flowed at one time through watercourses has since been picked up through site drainage and vectored into approved drainage through the development of engineered site plans. Drainage that, at one point, may have flowed through this dry gulch, now flows down Canyon View Drive and Buena Vista Way.
There is simply no justification to retain this relic on the City’s environmental map. It serves no “distinct functional, scenic or ecological purpose.” As an inactive relic of a former drainage course, the mapped watercourse serves no hydrological purpose whatsoever and should be removed from the map.
30 30 of 262
EXHIBIT 1
31 31 of 262
32 EXHIBIT 2
33 33 of 262
HYDROLOGY STUDY
600 Buena Vista Way
Parcel 2, L.L.A. 03-03
Laguna Beach, California
Laguna Beach Plan Check No.
Prepared for:
Susan Heystee & David Cozzens
c/o Laidlaw Schultz Architects
3111 Second Avenue
Corona Del Mar, CA 92625
Tel: 949-645-9982
Prepared by:
Toal Engineering, Inc.
139 Avenida Navarro
San Clemente, CA 92672
Tel: (949) 492-8586
Fax: (949) 498-8625
November 10, 2024
………………………………………………………
Caleb Rios R.C.E. 57587
JN 16209
34 34 of 262
Table of Contents
1.0 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE ................................................................................................... 1
3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE .................................................................................................... 1
4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................... 1
5.0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE .................................................................................................. 1
6.0 FLOW ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ............................................................................ 2
6.1 Rational Method For 100 Year Storm .................................................................................. 2
6.2 Manning’s Equation for Pipe Capacity ................................................................................. 2
7.0 FLOW RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ................................................................................ 2
8.0 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................. 2 APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................................. 1 APPENDIX B ................................................................................................................................. 4 APPENDIX C ................................................................................................................................. 5 35 35 of 262
1 1.0 PURPOSE
This report has been prepared to accompany the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan prepared by Toal Engineering, Inc. for the proposed new residence at 600 Buena Vista Way and to demonstrate that the proposed drainage system will accommodate the 100-year storm runoff across the project site. This report also intends to show that the existing significant drainage course on the project site has no upstream tributary area and, therefore, should not need to be designated as a watercourse going forward.
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE
The existing developed polygonal-shaped 1.516-acre (66,044 sq. ft.) lot consists of a developed pad with partially constructed retaining walls. The property is at the northerly terminus of Buena Vista Way. It is bordered on the north and east by natural slopes, and on the south and southwest by existing homes. Below the project site to the west is the northerly terminus of the Temple Hills Drive cul-de-sac.
See Figure 1 for a depiction of the project location and Figure 2 for an aerial photograph of the site (Appendix A).
3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE
Runoff from the hill above the pad, as well as the pad, sheet flows in a southerly direction towards Buena Vista Way. All runoff from the sloped portion of the site flows to the west to Temple Hills Drive.
4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The project consists of the construction of a new single family residence with appurtenant hardscape, walls, a swimming pool, and landscape areas. Along each side of the house are concrete walkways and patios, along with small planters. The project area is 23,135 sq. ft. (0.531 ac). The total area of the property is 66,044 sq. ft (1.516 ac), with 42,909 sq. ft. (0.985 ac) remaining untouched by the development.
5.0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE
The Hardscape improvements on the project site, including the building footprint, total approximately 14,400 square feet. Where possible, hardscape areas direct flows into adjacent planters to promote infiltration into the native soils and provide pre-treatment. Once all run-off is collected in the drainage system it will flow into an MWS unit for treatment prior to discharge.
All runoff from the project site, as well as runoff from the sites above, will be collected in 8” and 10” storm drain pipes and discharged to the street at Temple Hills Drive. 36 36 of 262
2 6.0 FLOW ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
6.1 Rational Method For 100 Year Storm
For post-project conditions, Toal Engineering, Inc. performed a rational method hydrologic analysis based on Orange County Hydrology Manual (OCHM) Section D to estimate the peak runoff quantities discharged from the site. The site time of concentration was conservatively estimated to be 5 minutes, which is the minimum allowed by the OCHM.
6.2 Manning’s Equation for Pipe Capacity
The full flow capacity of proposed drain lines was estimated using the Manning Equation and the details and assumptions can be found in Appendix B.
Calculations are shown in Appendix B. The Drainage Map in Appendix C graphically depicts the project watershed and data relevant to the runoff calculations.
7.0 FLOW RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Our hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the site yielded the following results:
Table 1. 100-Yr Peak Runoff.
Subarea Q100 (cfs)
A 4.62
B 1.83
C 3.76
Total 10.21
Table 2. Pipe Capacity Verification.
Pipe Size (in) Q100 (cfs) Sf required S0 proposed So > Sf 1 8 4.62 0.1247 0.150 Yes
2 8 1.83 0.0195 0.020 Yes
3 8 3.76 0.0827 0.100 Yes
4 10 10.21 0.1852 0.280 Yes
Table 2 shows for all pipes the proposed pipe slope is greater than the friction slope required to discharge the design flow rate. This is a conservative comparison since the available friction slope is greater than the proposed pipe slope.
8.0 CONCLUSIONS
The proposed storm drain system has sufficient capacity to convey estimated peak discharges to the community storm drain system.
37 37 of 262
3 Further, the proposed storm drain system will fully accommodate all runoff upstream of the existing drainage course, and discharge it to the street below (Temple Hills). 38 38 of 262
APPENDIX A
Vicinity Map and Aerial Image
39 39 of 262
2 Figure 1. Vicinity Map
maps.google.com
SITE
40 40 of 262
3 Figure 2. Aerial Image
maps.google.com
SITE
41 41 of 262
HYDROLOGY STUDY
600 Buena Vista Way
Parcel 2, L.L.A. 03-03
Laguna Beach, California
Laguna Beach Plan Check No. ZPC-2024-0542
Prepared for:
Susan Heystee & David Cozzens
c/o Laidlaw Schultz Architects
3111 Second Avenue
Corona Del Mar, CA 92625
Tel: 949-645-9982
Prepared by:
Toal Engineering, Inc.
139 Avenida Navarro
San Clemente, CA 92672
Tel: (949) 492-8586
Fax: (949) 498-8625
October 23, 2025
………………………………………………………
Caleb Rios R.C.E. 57587
JN 16209
Attachment 4
42 42 of 262
Table of Contents
1.0 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE ................................................................................................... 1
3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE .................................................................................................... 1
4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 2
5.0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE .................................................................................................. 2
6.0 FLOW ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ............................................................................ 2
6.1 Rational Method For 100 Year Storm .................................................................................. 2
6.2 Manning’s Equation for Pipe Capacity ................................................................................. 2
7.0 FLOW RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ................................................................................ 3
8.0 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................. 3 APPENDICES:
APPENDIX A: Vicinity Map, Aerial Image & Soil Map
APPENDIX B: Rational Method Analyses
APPENDIX C: Drainage Maps
APPENDIX D: Precise Grading Plans
43 43 of 262
1 1.0 PURPOSE
This report has been prepared to accompany the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan prepared by Toal Engineering, Inc. for the proposed new residence at 600 Buena Vista Way and to demonstrate that the proposed drainage system will accommodate the 100-year storm runoff across the project site.
This report also will demonstrate that the existing significant watercourse, as mapped on the City of Laguna Beach GIS Map, no longer serves a distinct functional, scenic, or ecological purpose (LBMC 25.50.030) This report will demonstrate that all existing and proposed upstream tributary areas to the existing significant drainage course is being collected by drain inlets and drain pipes and discharged to Temple Hills below or has been historically flowing down Buena Vista Way.
The watercourse is shown on both the Pre-Development and Post-Development Maps in Appendix C.
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE
The existing polygonal-shaped 1.514-acre (65,958 sq. ft.) lot consists of a developed pad with partially constructed retaining walls. The legal description of the property is Parcel 2 of LLA 03- 03, as shown on Record of Survey No. 2020-1152 filed in R.S.B. 320, Page 17, Official Records of Orange County, CA. The property is at the northerly terminus of Buena Vista Way. It is bordered on the north and east by natural slopes, and on the south and southwest by existing homes. Below the project site to the west is the northerly terminus of the Temple Hills Drive cul-de-sac. The property has roughly 170 feet of fall from its highest point on the easterly end of the property to its lowest point down at Temple Hills Drive.
See Figure 1 for a depiction of the project location and Figure 2 for an aerial photograph of the site (Appendix A).
3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE
The existing property is mostly a hillside that has natural fall in a westerly direction toward the down slope street, Temple Hills Drive.
The upper portion of the property above Buena Vista Way, roughly 1 acre, flows onto an existing pad and road which currently intercepts sheet flow onto the Buena Vista Way right of way.
The remaining portion of the area tributary to the project, roughly 1.67 acres, sheet flows to Temple Hills Road.
As mentioned above, the most northerly portion of the site flows directly to Temple Hills Drive without coming into contact with the existing natural watercourse. Under pre-construction conditions approximately 1.17 acres of area flow into the City Designated Natural Watercourse on the project site. Shown as Drainage Area B on the Pre-Development Hydrology Map (HY-1) in Appendix C.
44 44 of 262
2 Once runoff enters Temple Hills Drive right of way, it enters a concrete swale that runs to the north and outlets onto Park Avenue, at which point the runoff travels in the street gutter, of Park Avenue, heading southwest until it enters a concrete catch basin near the intersection of Park Avenue and Wendt Terrace.
See Pre-Development Hydrology Site Map (HY-1) in Appendix C for more information.
4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The project consists of the construction of a new single family residence with appurtenant hardscape, walls, a swimming pool, and landscape areas. Along each side of the house are concrete walkways and patios, along with small planters. The project area is 23,135 sq. ft. (0.531 ac). The total area of the property is 65,958 sq. ft (1.514 ac), with 42,823 sq. ft. (0.983 ac) remaining untouched by the development.
5.0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE
The Hardscape improvements on the project site, including the building footprint, total approximately 14,400 square feet. All runoff within this developed portion of the project site is being collected by a series of drain inlets and drain pipes and being discharged to the drainage swale at Temple Hills Drive.
Additionally, all runoff from the hills above the project site, including that portion which was previously tributary to the existing watercourse, is all being collected in 8” and 10” storm drain pipes and discharged to the concrete swale below at Temple Hills Drive.
After construction, no runoff from the project site, or from the hills above, will be directed towards the watercourse.
See Post-Development Hydrology Site Map (HY-2) in Appendix C for more information.
6.0 FLOW ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
6.1 Rational Method For 100 Year Storm
Toal Engineering, Inc. performed a rational method hydrologic analysis based on the Orange County Hydrology Manual (OCHM) Section D to estimate the peak runoff quantities discharged from the site for both Pre-Construction and Post-Construction Scenarios. Both Analyses were performed using Advanced Engineering Software (AES) and are included in Appendix B.
6.2 Manning’s Equation for Pipe Capacity
The full flow capacity of proposed drain lines was estimated using Manning’s Equation for specific nodes within the post-development AES analysis in Appendix B.
The Drainage Map in Appendix C graphically depicts the project watershed and data relevant to the runoff calculations.
45 45 of 262
3 7.0 FLOW RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Our hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the site yielded the following results:
Table 1. 100-Yr Pre-Development Peak Runoff.
Location Q100 (cfs)
Node 2 (Buena Vista) 4.45
Subarea B 5.31
Node 12 (Temple Hills) 7.61
Table 1 shows the Pre-Construction 100-year storm flows at each outlet point, as well as highlighting the 100-year storm flows exclusively tributary to the Watercourse (Subarea B).
Table 2. 100-Yr Post-Development Peak Runoff.
Location Q100 (cfs)
Pipe Discharge at Temple Hills 9.86
Subarea N 3.59
Node 10 (Total Flow) 13.41
Table 2 shows the Post-Construction 100-year storm flows at each outlet point, as well as highlighting the 100-year storm flows exclusively tributary to the Watercourse (Subarea N).
Table 3. Pipe Capacity Verification.
Pipe
Node
Size (in) Q100 (cfs) Sf required S0 proposed So > Sf
7 10 7.43 0.0980 0.10 Yes
74 8 1.61 0.0151 0.02 Yes
8 10 8.95 0.1422 0.25 Yes
10 10 9.86 0.1726 0.25 Yes
Table 3 shows for all pipes the proposed pipe slope is greater than the friction slope required to discharge the design flow rate. This is a conservative comparison since the available friction slope is greater than the proposed pipe slope.
8.0 CONCLUSIONS
The proposed storm drain system has sufficient capacity to convey estimated peak discharges to the community storm drain system.
46 46 of 262
4 Further, as reflected on the “Pre-Development Hydrology Site Plan”, sheet HY-1, many of the areas upstream of the aforementioned Significant Drainage Watercouse do not flow to the water course and instead flow down Canyon View Drive, Buena Vista Way, or Temple Hills Drive. The runoff within Subarea B (1.173 acres, Q100=5.31 cfs) on sheet HY-1 flows to the watercourse.
After the development of the home, the drainage area tributary to the Drainage Watercourse will be reduced, since drainage from the improvement areas will be carried down past the watercourse within pipes to Temple Hills Drive. After development, only the runoff within Subarea N (0.682 acres, Q100=3.59 cfs) on sheet HY-2 flows to the water course. The 100-year runoff to the watercourse is reduced by 1.72 cfs.
It is our opinion that the portion of “Drainage Watercourse” above Temple Hills Drive should be removed from the City website as post-development there will be no natural runoff tributary to it. 47 47 of 262
APPENDIX A
Vicinity Map, Aerial Image and Soil Map
48 48 of 262
2 Figure 1. Vicinity Map
maps.google.com
SITE
49 49 of 262
3 Figure 2. Aerial Image
maps.google.com
SITE
50 50 of 262
Hydrologic Soil Group—Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California (600 Buena Vista Way)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/5/2025
3711620 3711660 3711700 3711740 3711780 3711820 3711860 3711620 3711660 3711700 3711740 3711780 3711820 3711860 428270 428310 428350 428390 428430 428470 428510 428550 428590 428630 428670 428270 428310 428350 428390 428430 428470 428510 428550 428590 428630 428670 33° 32' 38'' N
117° 46' 21'' W
33° 32' 38'' N
117° 46' 5'' W
33° 32' 30'' N
117° 46' 21'' W
33° 32' 30'' N N 117° 46' 5'' W
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 25 50 100 150
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,850 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
51 51 of 262
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California
Survey Area Data: Version 18, Aug 30, 2024
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jan 17, 2023—Feb 8, 2023
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Hydrologic Soil Group—Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California (600 Buena Vista Way)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/5/2025
52 52 of 262
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 110 Anaheim clay loam, 50
to 75 percent slopes
C 7.4 45.8%
113 Balcom clay loam, 30 to
50 percent slopes
C 7.2 44.9%
145 Cieneba-Rock outcrop
complex, 30 to 75
percent slopes
D 1.5 9.3%
Totals for Area of Interest 16.1 100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Hydrologic Soil Group—Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California 600 Buena Vista Way Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/5/2025
53 53 of 262
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Hydrologic Soil Group—Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California 600 Buena Vista Way Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/5/2025
54 54 of 262
4 APPENDIX B
Rational Method Analyses (using AES Software) for Pre and Post Construction Scenarios 55 55 of 262
Pre-Development Rational Method Analysis
Advanced Engineering Software (AES)
56 56 of 262
____________________________________________________________________________ ****************************************************************************
RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE
(Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION)
(c) Copyright 1983‐2012 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 18.2 Release Date: 05/08/2012 License ID 1448
Analysis prepared by:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FILE NAME: 16209PRE.DAT
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 16:42 10/22/2025
============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION:
============================================================================ ‐‐*TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION MODEL*‐‐
USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00
SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00
SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED*
*ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER‐DEFINED STREET‐SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF‐ CROWN TO STREET‐CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER‐GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN‐ / OUT‐/PARK‐ HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW‐DEPTH CONSTRAINTS:
1. Relative Flow‐Depth = 0.00 FEET
as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) ‐ (Top‐of‐Curb)
2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S)
*SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN
OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.*
*USER‐SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 357.00
57 57 of 262
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 451.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 358.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.690
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.236
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.99 0.25 0.900 50 6.69 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.45
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.99 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.45 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 447.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 456.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 268.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.651
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.254
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 1.17 0.25 0.900 50 6.65 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.31
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.17 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.31 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE = 81 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<<
============================================================================ MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 6.65
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.254
SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN RESIDENTIAL C 0.51 0.25 0.900 50 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.51 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.30 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.68 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.22 58 58 of 262
AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.7 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.61 ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY:
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.7 TC(MIN.) = 6.65 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.68 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.22 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.900 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.61
============================================================================ ============================================================================
END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS
59 59 of 262
Post-Development Rational Method Analysis
Advanced Engineering Software (AES)
60 60 of 262
____________________________________________________________________________ ****************************************************************************
RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE
(Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION)
(c) Copyright 1983‐2012 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 18.2 Release Date: 05/08/2012 License ID 1448
Analysis prepared by:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FILE NAME: 16209POS.DAT
TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 10:04 10/23/2025
============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION:
============================================================================ ‐‐*TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION MODEL*‐‐
USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00
SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00
SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED*
*ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER‐DEFINED STREET‐SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF‐ CROWN TO STREET‐CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER‐GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN‐ / OUT‐/PARK‐ HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW‐DEPTH CONSTRAINTS:
1. Relative Flow‐Depth = 0.00 FEET
as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) ‐ (Top‐of‐Curb)
2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S)
*SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN
OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.*
*USER‐SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 140.00
61 61 of 262
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 456.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 374.30 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.34 0.25 0.900 50 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.84
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.84 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 364.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 363.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 80.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
ASSUME FULL‐FLOWING PIPELINE
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.26
PIPE FLOW VELOCITY = (TOTAL FLOW)/(PIPE CROSS SECTION AREA) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.84
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.25 Tc(MIN.) = 5.25
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 3.00 = 220.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 22.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 148.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 451.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 378.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc 62 62 of 262
LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.26 0.25 0.900 50 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.41
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.26 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.41 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 22.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 366.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 363.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 20.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.7 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 13.72
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.41
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.02 Tc(MIN.) = 5.02
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 3.00 = 168.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.41 5.02 6.170 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.3 21.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 3.00 = 168.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.84 5.25 6.014 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.3 1.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 3.00 = 220.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.21 5.02 6.170 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.6 21.00 2 3.20 5.25 6.014 0.25( 0.23) 0.90 0.6 1.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.6
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.21 Tc(MIN.) = 5.024
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.59 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.22 63 63 of 262
AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.6
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 3.00 = 220.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 363.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 361.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 82.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
ASSUME FULL‐FLOWING PIPELINE
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.19
PIPE FLOW VELOCITY = (TOTAL FLOW)/(PIPE CROSS SECTION AREA) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 3.21
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.15 Tc(MIN.) = 5.17
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 4.00 = 302.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 32.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 143.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 443.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 369.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.28 0.25 0.900 50 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.52
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.28 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.52 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 32.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 64 64 of 262
>>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 364.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 361.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 16.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.6 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 15.20
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.52
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.02 Tc(MIN.) = 5.02
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 4.00 = 159.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 2 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.52 5.02 6.175 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.3 31.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 4.00 = 159.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 2 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.21 5.17 6.068 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.6 21.00 2 3.20 5.40 5.919 0.25( 0.23) 0.90 0.6 1.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 4.00 = 302.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 4.69 5.02 6.175 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.9 31.00 2 4.70 5.17 6.068 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.9 21.00 3 4.66 5.40 5.919 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.9 1.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.9
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.70 Tc(MIN.) = 5.173
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.87 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.22 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.9
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 4.00 = 302.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
65 65 of 262
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 361.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 360.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 42.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
ASSUME FULL‐FLOWING PIPELINE
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 13.48
PIPE FLOW VELOCITY = (TOTAL FLOW)/(PIPE CROSS SECTION AREA) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 4.70
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.05 Tc(MIN.) = 5.22
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 5.00 = 344.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 42.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 158.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 433.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 365.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.11 0.25 0.900 50 5.00
SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.60
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.11 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.60 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 42.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 360.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 360.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 24.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.0 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.02
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 66 66 of 262
PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 0.60
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.08 Tc(MIN.) = 5.08
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 5.00 = 182.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 3 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.60 5.08 6.132 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.1 41.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 5.00 = 182.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 3 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 4.69 5.07 6.138 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.9 31.00 2 4.70 5.22 6.033 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.9 21.00 3 4.66 5.45 5.886 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.9 1.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 5.00 = 344.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 5.29 5.07 6.138 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 31.00 2 5.29 5.08 6.132 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 41.00 3 5.29 5.22 6.033 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 21.00 4 5.23 5.45 5.886 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 1.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.0
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.29 Tc(MIN.) = 5.225
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.98 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.23 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.0
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 5.00 = 344.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 360.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 359.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 18.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
ASSUME FULL‐FLOWING PIPELINE
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 15.16
67 67 of 262
PIPE FLOW VELOCITY = (TOTAL FLOW)/(PIPE CROSS SECTION AREA) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 5.29
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.02 Tc(MIN.) = 5.24
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 6.00 = 362.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 51.00 TO NODE 52.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 163.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 431.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 366.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.14 0.25 0.900 50 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.77
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.14 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.77 68 68 of 262
**************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 52.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 361.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 358.50 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 25.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.2 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 10.10
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 0.77
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.04 Tc(MIN.) = 5.04
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 51.00 TO NODE 6.00 = 188.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.77 5.04 6.158 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.1 51.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 51.00 TO NODE 6.00 = 188.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 5.29 5.09 6.125 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 31.00 2 5.29 5.10 6.118 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 41.00 3 5.29 5.24 6.020 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 21.00 4 5.23 5.47 5.874 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.0 1.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 6.00 = 362.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 6.03 5.04 6.158 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 51.00 2 6.05 5.09 6.125 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 31.00 3 6.05 5.10 6.118 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 41.00 4 6.04 5.24 6.020 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 21.00 5 5.96 5.47 5.874 0.25( 0.23) 0.90 1.1 1.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.1
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.05 Tc(MIN.) = 5.099
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.11 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.22 69 69 of 262
AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.1
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 6.00 = 362.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 358.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 353.70 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 6.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.9 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 35.40
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 6.05
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.00 Tc(MIN.) = 5.10
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 7.00 = 368.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 7.00 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 61.00 TO NODE 62.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 113.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 419.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 362.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.15 0.25 0.900 50 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.80
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.15 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.80 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 62.00 TO NODE 63.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
70 70 of 262
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 357.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 354.80 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 18.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.1 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 11.08
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 0.80
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.03 Tc(MIN.) = 5.03
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 61.00 TO NODE 63.00 = 131.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 63.00 TO NODE 63.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 112.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 108.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 363.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 357.90 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.09 0.25 0.100 50 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.53
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.09 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.53 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 112.00 TO NODE 63.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 356.90 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 354.80 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 35.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.1 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.08
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 0.53
71 71 of 262
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.08 Tc(MIN.) = 5.08
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 63.00 = 143.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 63.00 TO NODE 63.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 3 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.53 5.08 6.130 0.25( 0.03) 0.10 0.1 111.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 63.00 = 143.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 3 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.80 5.03 6.168 0.25( 0.23) 0.90 0.1 61.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 61.00 TO NODE 63.00 = 131.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.32 5.03 6.168 0.25( 0.15) 0.59 0.2 61.00 2 1.32 5.08 6.130 0.25( 0.15) 0.59 0.2 111.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.2
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.32 Tc(MIN.) = 5.027
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.24 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.15 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.59 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.2
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 63.00 = 143.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 63.00 TO NODE 64.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 354.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 354.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 20.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 10.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.5 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.80
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 10.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.32
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.04 Tc(MIN.) = 5.07
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 64.00 = 163.00 FEET. 72 72 of 262
**************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 64.00 TO NODE 64.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 64.00 TO NODE 64.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 104.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 365.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 361.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.989
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.580
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.01 0.25 0.900 50 5.99 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.06
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.01 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.06 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 64.00 TO NODE 64.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 3 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.06 5.99 5.580 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 0.0 101.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 64.00 = 104.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 3 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.32 5.07 6.138 0.25( 0.15) 0.59 0.2 61.00 2 1.32 5.13 6.100 0.25( 0.15) 0.59 0.2 111.00 73 73 of 262
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 64.00 = 163.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.38 5.07 6.138 0.25( 0.15) 0.60 0.3 61.00 2 1.38 5.13 6.100 0.25( 0.15) 0.60 0.3 111.00 3 1.27 5.99 5.580 0.25( 0.15) 0.60 0.3 101.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.38 Tc(MIN.) = 5.070
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.15 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 64.00 = 163.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 64.00 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 354.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 353.70 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 12.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 10.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.1 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.65
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 10.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.38
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.03 Tc(MIN.) = 5.10
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 7.00 = 175.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 7.00 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 2 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.38 5.10 6.118 0.25( 0.15) 0.60 0.3 61.00 2 1.38 5.16 6.080 0.25( 0.15) 0.60 0.3 111.00 3 1.27 6.02 5.563 0.25( 0.15) 0.60 0.3 101.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 111.00 TO NODE 7.00 = 175.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 2 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 6.03 5.04 6.156 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 51.00 74 74 of 262
2 6.05 5.09 6.123 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 31.00 3 6.05 5.10 6.116 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 41.00 4 6.04 5.25 6.018 0.25( 0.22) 0.90 1.1 21.00 5 5.96 5.48 5.872 0.25( 0.23) 0.90 1.1 1.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 7.00 = 368.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 7.41 5.04 6.156 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 51.00 2 7.43 5.09 6.123 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 31.00 3 7.43 5.10 6.118 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 61.00 4 7.43 5.10 6.116 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 41.00 5 7.43 5.16 6.080 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 111.00 6 7.41 5.25 6.018 0.25( 0.21) 0.85 1.4 21.00 7 7.30 5.48 5.872 0.25( 0.21) 0.85 1.4 1.00 8 6.91 6.02 5.563 0.25( 0.21) 0.85 1.4 101.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.4
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 7.43 Tc(MIN.) = 5.100
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.36 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.21 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.84 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.4
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 7.00 = 368.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 7.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 353.70 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 340.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 16.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 10.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.9 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 38.03
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 10.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 7.43
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.01 Tc(MIN.) = 5.11
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 8.00 = 384.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 75 75 of 262
>>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 71.00 TO NODE 72.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 134.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 367.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 366.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.388
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.947
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.10 0.25 0.400 50 7.39 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.400
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.43
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.10 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.43 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 72.00 TO NODE 73.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 363.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 363.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 62.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 6.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.3 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.86
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 6.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 0.43
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.27 Tc(MIN.) = 7.66
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 71.00 TO NODE 73.00 = 196.00 FEET. 76 76 of 262
**************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 73.00 TO NODE 73.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 82.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 238.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 372.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 365.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.665
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.248
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.18 0.25 0.400 50 6.67 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.400
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.84
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.18 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.84 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 82.00 TO NODE 73.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 363.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 363.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 20.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
ASSUME FULL‐FLOWING PIPELINE
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.29
PIPE FLOW VELOCITY = (TOTAL FLOW)/(PIPE CROSS SECTION AREA) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 6.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 0.84
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.08 Tc(MIN.) = 6.74
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 73.00 = 258.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 73.00 TO NODE 73.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 2 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ 77 77 of 262
** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.84 6.74 5.213 0.25( 0.10) 0.40 0.2 81.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 73.00 = 258.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 2 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.43 7.66 4.847 0.25( 0.10) 0.40 0.1 71.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 71.00 TO NODE 73.00 = 196.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.25 6.74 5.213 0.25( 0.10) 0.40 0.3 81.00 2 1.21 7.66 4.847 0.25( 0.10) 0.40 0.3 71.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.25 Tc(MIN.) = 6.743
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.27 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.10 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.40 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 73.00 = 258.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 73.00 TO NODE 74.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 363.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 358.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 6.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 1.7 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 22.21
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.25
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.00 Tc(MIN.) = 6.75
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 74.00 = 264.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 74.00 TO NODE 74.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 91.00 TO NODE 92.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 78 78 of 262
>>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 128.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 366.40 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 360.60 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.07 0.25 0.200 50 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.41
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.07 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.41 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 92.00 TO NODE 74.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 359.60 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 358.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 88.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
ASSUME FULL‐FLOWING PIPELINE
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.68
PIPE FLOW VELOCITY = (TOTAL FLOW)/(PIPE CROSS SECTION AREA) GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 4.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 0.41
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.31 Tc(MIN.) = 5.31
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 91.00 TO NODE 74.00 = 216.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 74.00 TO NODE 74.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 3 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.41 5.31 5.976 0.25( 0.05) 0.20 0.1 91.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 91.00 TO NODE 74.00 = 216.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 3 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.25 6.75 5.211 0.25( 0.10) 0.40 0.3 81.00 79 79 of 262
2 1.21 7.66 4.846 0.25( 0.10) 0.40 0.3 71.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 74.00 = 264.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.54 5.31 5.976 0.25( 0.09) 0.35 0.3 91.00 2 1.61 6.75 5.211 0.25( 0.09) 0.36 0.3 81.00 3 1.55 7.66 4.846 0.25( 0.09) 0.36 0.4 71.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.4
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.61 Tc(MIN.) = 6.747
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.34 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.09 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.36 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.4
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 74.00 = 264.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 74.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 358.60 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 340.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 50.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 8.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.4 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 18.73
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 8.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.61
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.04 Tc(MIN.) = 6.79
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 8.00 = 314.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.54 5.36 5.947 0.25( 0.09) 0.35 0.3 91.00 2 1.61 6.79 5.191 0.25( 0.09) 0.36 0.3 81.00 3 1.55 7.71 4.829 0.25( 0.09) 0.36 0.4 71.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 81.00 TO NODE 8.00 = 314.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 80 80 of 262
1 7.41 5.05 6.151 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 51.00 2 7.43 5.10 6.118 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 31.00 3 7.43 5.11 6.113 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 61.00 4 7.43 5.11 6.111 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 41.00 5 7.43 5.16 6.075 0.25( 0.21) 0.84 1.4 111.00 6 7.41 5.25 6.014 0.25( 0.21) 0.85 1.4 21.00 7 7.30 5.48 5.868 0.25( 0.21) 0.85 1.4 1.00 8 6.91 6.03 5.559 0.25( 0.21) 0.85 1.4 101.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 8.00 = 384.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 8.92 5.05 6.151 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 51.00 2 8.94 5.10 6.118 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 31.00 3 8.95 5.11 6.113 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 61.00 4 8.95 5.11 6.111 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 41.00 5 8.95 5.16 6.075 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 111.00 6 8.94 5.25 6.014 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 21.00 7 8.90 5.36 5.947 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 91.00 8 8.85 5.48 5.868 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 1.00 9 8.48 6.03 5.559 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 101.00 10 8.04 6.79 5.191 0.25( 0.19) 0.75 1.7 81.00 11 7.51 7.71 4.829 0.25( 0.19) 0.75 1.8 71.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.8
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.95 Tc(MIN.) = 5.162
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.65 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.19 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.76 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.8
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 8.00 = 384.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 340.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 323.70 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 85.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 10.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.8 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 22.55
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 10.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 8.95
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.06 Tc(MIN.) = 5.23
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 9.00 = 469.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 12 81 81 of 262
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CLEAR MEMORY BANK # 3 <<<<<
============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 121.00 TO NODE 122.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 210.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 356.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 342.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 6.893
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.147
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.23 0.25 0.800 50 6.89 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.800
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.03
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.23 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.03 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 122.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 332.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 323.70 82 82 of 262
FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 12.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 6.0 INCH PIPE IS 1.8 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 21.18
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 6.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 1.03
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.01 Tc(MIN.) = 6.90
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 121.00 TO NODE 9.00 = 222.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.03 6.90 5.143 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 0.2 121.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 121.00 TO NODE 9.00 = 222.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 8.92 5.11 6.108 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 51.00 2 8.94 5.16 6.075 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 31.00 3 8.95 5.17 6.070 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 61.00 4 8.95 5.17 6.068 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 41.00 5 8.95 5.23 6.033 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.6 111.00 6 8.94 5.32 5.973 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 21.00 7 8.90 5.42 5.907 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 91.00 8 8.85 5.55 5.830 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 1.00 9 8.48 6.09 5.526 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.7 101.00 10 8.04 6.86 5.164 0.25( 0.19) 0.75 1.7 81.00 11 7.51 7.77 4.806 0.25( 0.19) 0.75 1.8 71.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 9.00 = 469.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 9.83 5.11 6.108 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 51.00 2 9.86 5.16 6.075 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 31.00 3 9.86 5.17 6.070 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 61.00 4 9.86 5.17 6.068 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 41.00 5 9.86 5.23 6.033 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 111.00 6 9.86 5.32 5.973 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.8 21.00 7 9.84 5.42 5.907 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.9 91.00 8 9.79 5.55 5.830 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.9 1.00 9 9.46 6.09 5.526 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.9 101.00 10 9.07 6.86 5.164 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 2.0 81.00 11 9.04 6.90 5.143 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 2.0 121.00 83 83 of 262
12 8.47 7.77 4.806 0.25( 0.19) 0.75 2.0 71.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.0
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 9.86 Tc(MIN.) = 5.225
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.82 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.19 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.76 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.0
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 9.00 = 469.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE = 41 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE‐FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<<
>>>>>USING USER‐SPECIFIED PIPESIZE (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 323.70 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 260.50 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 170.00 MANNING'S N = 0.011
DEPTH OF FLOW IN 10.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.8 INCHES
PIPE‐FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 29.94
GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 10.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE‐FLOW(CFS) = 9.86
PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.09 Tc(MIN.) = 5.32
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 10.00 = 639.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE = 10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 131.00 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE = 21 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<<
>>USE TIME‐OF‐CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW‐LENGTH(FEET) = 240.00
ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 363.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 260.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20
SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.170
* 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.070
SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ):
DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) RESIDENTIAL C 0.68 0.25 0.900 50 5.17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.900
SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.59
84 84 of 262
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.68 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.59 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE = 11 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 2 WITH THE MAIN‐STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.59 5.17 6.070 0.25( 0.23) 0.90 0.7 131.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 131.00 TO NODE 10.00 = 240.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 2 CONFLUENCE DATA **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 9.83 5.21 6.044 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 51.00 2 9.86 5.26 6.012 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 31.00 3 9.86 5.26 6.007 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 61.00 4 9.86 5.27 6.006 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 41.00 5 9.86 5.32 5.971 0.25( 0.19) 0.77 1.8 111.00 6 9.86 5.41 5.913 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.8 21.00 7 9.84 5.52 5.849 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.9 91.00 8 9.79 5.64 5.773 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.9 1.00 9 9.46 6.19 5.477 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 1.9 101.00 10 9.07 6.95 5.122 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 2.0 81.00 11 9.04 7.00 5.103 0.25( 0.19) 0.76 2.0 121.00 12 8.47 7.87 4.772 0.25( 0.19) 0.75 2.0 71.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 10.00 = 639.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 13.39 5.17 6.070 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 131.00 2 13.40 5.21 6.044 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 51.00 3 13.41 5.26 6.012 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 31.00 4 13.41 5.26 6.007 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 61.00 5 13.41 5.27 6.006 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 41.00 6 13.39 5.32 5.971 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 111.00 7 13.35 5.41 5.913 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 21.00 8 13.29 5.52 5.849 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 91.00 9 13.20 5.64 5.773 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.6 1.00 10 12.68 6.19 5.477 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.6 101.00 11 12.07 6.95 5.122 0.25( 0.20) 0.79 2.7 81.00 12 12.03 7.00 5.103 0.25( 0.20) 0.79 2.7 121.00 13 11.26 7.87 4.772 0.25( 0.20) 0.79 2.7 71.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.7
COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
85 85 of 262
PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 13.41 Tc(MIN.) = 5.257
EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.49 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.20 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.80 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.7
LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 10.00 = 639.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY:
TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.7 TC(MIN.) = 5.26 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.49 AREA‐AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.20 AREA‐AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.25 AREA‐AVERAGED Ap = 0.803 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 13.41
** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE **
STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 13.39 5.17 6.070 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 131.00 2 13.40 5.21 6.044 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 51.00 3 13.41 5.26 6.012 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 31.00 4 13.41 5.26 6.007 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 61.00 5 13.41 5.27 6.006 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 41.00 6 13.39 5.32 5.971 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 111.00 7 13.35 5.41 5.913 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 21.00 8 13.29 5.52 5.849 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.5 91.00 9 13.20 5.64 5.773 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.6 1.00 10 12.68 6.19 5.477 0.25( 0.20) 0.80 2.6 101.00 11 12.07 6.95 5.122 0.25( 0.20) 0.79 2.7 81.00 12 12.03 7.00 5.103 0.25( 0.20) 0.79 2.7 121.00 13 11.26 7.87 4.772 0.25( 0.20) 0.79 2.7 71.00 ============================================================================ ============================================================================
END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS
86 86 of 262
5 APPENDIX C
Drainage Maps
87 87 of 262
448.44' FL 448.36' FL448.07' FL
413.39' FL
415.05' FL
415.93' FL
417.80' FL
418.64' FL
PRIVATE DRIVEWAY R= 1 8 0 . 0 0 ' = 1 9 ° 3 8 ' 3 9 " L = 6 1 . 7 1 ' R= 9 5 . 0 0 ' = 5 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 4 " L = 9 7 . 6 7 ' = R 1 3 . 0 0 0 ' 1 = ° 9 7 3 4 1 ' " 1 = L . 6 0 ' 6 1 1 = R 7 4 0 . ' 0 4 = ° 5 5 4 ' 0 " L = 1 1 7 . 3 8 ' R= 2 1 0 . 0 0 ' = 4 4 ° 1 5 ' 0 0 " L = 1 6 2 . 1 8 ' R= 1 2 5 . 0 0 ' = 5 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 4 " L = 1 2 8 . 5 1 ' 425.41' R.S. 28/44 HSGC 2 358.0 Q=4.45 cfs 1 451.0 11 456.0 21 456.0 HSGC HSGD HSGC 12 268.0 Q=7.57 cfs 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 w w w . t o a l e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G S T O R M W A T E R Q U A L I T Y LEGENDPROPERTY LINE RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION AREA IN ACRES X.X X.XXX DRAINAGE SUBAREA NUMBER HSGD HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP 2.45 NODE NUMBER AND ELEVATION(S) 123.45 120.45 FLOW PATH HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP BOUNDARY WATERSHED BOUNDARY EXISTING SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE COURSE 88 448.44' FL 448.36' FL448.07' FL
415.05' FL
415.93' FL
417.80' FL
418.64' FL
PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
425.41' POOL GARAGE F.F.=368.40 T/SLAB=368.28 PAD=367.36 SPA F.F.=367.70 T/SLAB=367.58 PAD=366.66 F.F.=367.70 T/SLAB=367.58 PAD=366.66 PAD=365.58
PAD=365.78 F.F.=355.72 T/SLAB=355.60 PAD=354.68 F.F.=355.72 T/SLAB=355.60 PAD=354.68 HSGC HSGC HSGD HSGC 1 456.0 2 374.3 364.3 21 451.0 22 378.5 366.5 31 443.0 32 369.0 364.5 3 363.0 4 361.0 41 433.0 42 365.0 360.5 52 366.0 361.5 51 431.0 62 362.5 357.5 61 419.0 5 360.0 6 358.57 353.7 Q=7.43 cfs 8 340.0 Q=8.95 cfs 9 323.7 Q=9.86 cfs 10 260.5 63 354.8 64 354.0 112 357.9 356.9 71 367.3 72 366.5 363.8 73 363 74 358.6 Q=1.61 cfs 82 365.0 363.3 81 372.5 91 366.4 92 360.6 359.6 101 365.5 102 361.5 111 363.8 121 356.0 122 342.5 332.0 131 363.0 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 w w w . t o a l e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G S T O R M W A T E R Q U A L I T Y LEGENDPROPERTY LINE RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION AREA IN ACRES X.X X.XXX DRAINAGE SUBAREA NUMBER HSGD HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP 2.45 NODE NUMBER AND ELEVATION(S) 123.45 120.45 FLOW PATH HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP BOUNDARY WATERSHED BOUNDARY EXISTING SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE COURSE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SCHEMATIC A12345678910 B2121 C3132 D4142 E5152 F616263 L111 112 64 102 101 K 73 74 MWS 717282 H 81 J9192 122 121 M 131 G DISCHARGE AT TEMPLE HILLS DRIVE NTREATED FLOW=0.083 cfs BYPASS CAPACITY > 1.75 cfs 89 6
APPENDIX D
Precise Grading Plans
90 90 of 262
1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 ww w .toal en gin eering.com C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G STORMWATER QUALITY PRECISE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 600 BUENA VISTA, LAGUNA BEACH, CALIFORNIA NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNER ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND QUANTITY ESTIMATE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. SHEET INDEX C-1 TITLE SHEET C-2 PRECISE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C-3 SECTIONS C-4 DETAILS C-5 EROSION CONTROL PLAN DATE REVISED: 7-1-06 8 1 1 Know what's below. Call before you dig. PROJECT INFORMATION ADDRESS SOILS ENGINEER NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR GENERAL GRADING NOTES EROSION CONTROL STANDARDS WATER QUALITY NOTES PARCEL 2, L.L.A. 03-03, INST. 2003000815643 SUBMITTAL SET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BENCH MARK NOTES TO CONTRACTOR GENERAL GRADING NOTES (CONT.): TEMPLE HILLS DR. COAST VIEW DR. VISTA WAY CANYON BAYVIEW PL. GLENNEYRE ST. SOUTH COAST HWY. THALIA ST. PARK AVE. LAGUNA AVE. VIEW DR. BUENA TEMPLE HILLS DR. SITE NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP PUBLIC WORKS NOTES C-6 C-7 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (reference only) SECTIONS 91 POOL GARAGE F.F.=368.40 T/SLAB=368.28 PAD=367.36 SPA F.F.=367.70 T/SLAB=367.58 PAD=366.66 F.F.=367.70 T/SLAB=367.58 PAD=366.66 PAD=365.58
PAD=365.78
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C-3 F.F.=355.72 T/SLAB=355.60 PAD=354.68 F.F.=355.72 T/SLAB=355.60 PAD=354.68 CONSTRUCTION NOTES NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS / APPROVALS In addition to any certifications required by the agencies having jurisdiction over this project, the following approvals from the Civil engineer of record are required: 1. Foundation forms for improvements on or abutting property lines is required prior to concrete pour. 2. Location, size, and depth of all drain lines prior to backfill. LEGEND 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 ww w .toal en gin eering.com C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G STORMWATER QUALITY ADDITIONAL NOTES EASEMENT NOTES SEE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ON SHEET TP-01 92 SECTION SECTION MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C-2 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 w w w . t o a l e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G S T O R M W A T E R Q U A L I T Y 93 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 w w w . t o a l e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G S T O R M W A T E R Q U A L I T Y DETAIL TYPICAL DRIVEWAY / HARDSCAPE SECTION DETAIL TYPICAL RETAINING WALL SUBDRAIN DETAIL DETAIL TYPICAL DRAIN INLET DETAIL DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION DETAIL TYPICAL DRAIN INLET DETAIL CONC. V-DITCH DETAIL TYPICAL BUILDING DRAINAGE AT LANDSCAPING DETAIL TYPICAL BUILDING DRAINAGE AT HARDSCAPE DETAIL OUTLET STRUCTURE SECTION X-X DETAIL MWS LINEAR DETAIL DRAIN INLET IN V-DITCH 94 SECTION SECTION 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 w w w . t o a l e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G S T O R M W A T E R Q U A L I T Y 95 POOL GARAGE F.F.=368.40 T/SLAB=368.28 PAD=367.36 SPA F.F.=367.70 T/SLAB=367.58 PAD=366.66 F.F.=367.70 T/SLAB=367.58 PAD=366.66 PAD=365.58
PAD=365.78
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C-3 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C-2 F.F.=355.72 T/SLAB=355.60 PAD=354.68 F.F.=355.72 T/SLAB=355.60 PAD=354.68 LEGEND NOTE EROSION CONTROL BMPs TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL WIND EROSION CONTROL TRACKING CONTROL WASTE MANAGEMENT AND MATERIALS POLLUTION CONTROL NON-STORMWATER MANAGEMENT YEAR-ROUND BMP REQUIREMENTS 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 w w w. toalengineering.com C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G STORMWATER QUALITY 96 BOUNDARY NOTE: 1 3 9 A v e n i d a N a v a r r o S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 9 4 9 . 4 9 2 . 8 5 8 6 w w w . t o a l e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G L A N D S U R V E Y I N G S T O R M W A T E R Q U A L I T Y STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A L ICENSED LAND SURVEYO VIKTOR P. RMEUM No. 8682 EASEMENT NOTE: ALL EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ARE PER A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE COMPANY, POLICY NO. CA-FXDD-ICL-81306-1-16-215570192 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 5 ITEM 5 OF THE POLICY, EASEMENTS FOR SEWER LINES DISCLOSED IN CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 711 DO NOT FALL ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ARE NOT PLOTTED HEREON. 6 ITEM 6 OF THE POLICY, AN EASEMENT FOR GAS PIPES RECORDED IN BOOK 2023, PAGE 250 O.R. DOES NOT FALL ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IS NOT PLOTTED HEREON. 7 ITEM 7 OF THE POLICY, EASEMENTS FOR PIPELINES, INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED IN BOOK 11836, PAGE 1592 O.R. 8 ITEM 8 OF THE POLICY, AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES RECORDED IN BOOK 14249, PAGE 1110 O.R. 9 ITEM 9 OF THE POLICY, AN EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-034969 O.R. 10 ITEM 10 OF THE POLICY, A DECLARATION OF OPEN SPACE RESTRICTION RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006000288577 O.R. IS NOT PLOTTED HEREON. EXHIBITS A AND B REFERENCED IN THE DOCUMENT ARE NOT INCLUDED AND THE LOCATION OF THE RESTRICTION CANNOT BE DETERMINED. 11 ITEM 11 OF THE POLICY, A DECLARATION OF OPEN SPACE RESTRICTION RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008000129372 O.R. THERE IS AN ERROR IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE OPEN SPACE AND THE LINE PLOTTED HEREON IS A BEST INTERPRETATION OF THE OPEN SPACE LOCATION. 12 ITEM 12 OF THE POLICY, AN EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008000151621 O.R. THERE IS AN ERROR IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE EASEMENT AND THE LINE PLOTTED HEREON IS A BEST INTERPRETATION OF THE EASEMENT LOCATION. A AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2014000367651 O.R. AS SHOWN ON RSB 287/12. 97 CARLSBAD
FRESNO
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
PALM SPRINGS
POINT RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE
ROSEVILLE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
20 Executive Park, Suite 200, Irvine, California 92614 949.553.0666 www.lsa.net October 21, 2024
Dave Cozzens and Susan
Heystee 566 Temple Hills Drive
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Subject: Vegetation Map and Biological Resources Review for the Cozzens Residence Project Located at 600 Buena Vista Way in Laguna Beach, Orange County, California Dear Mr. Cozzens and Ms. Heystee:
LSA Associates, Inc., (LSA) is pleased to provide this review of biological resources for a proposed single-home residential construction project located at 600 Buena Vista Way in Laguna Beach, California. LSA previously provided a memorandum that documented the vegetation communities and all observed plant species within the subject property (APN 641-373-43). In October 2024, LSA was requested to review the current project site plan (dated 10/19/22) prepared by Total Engineering, Inc.
METHODS
Project site plans, background information, and fuel modification zone shapefiles were provided to LSA Biologists Lonnie Rodriguez and Bo Gould by Jerry Canales (Firesafe Planning Solutions) in January 2021. Updated site plans were provided by Craig Schultz of Laidlaw Schultz Architects on October 16, 2024. Vegetation mapping of the project site was conducted by LSA Biologist Bo Gould on February 21, 2018. The entire project site was surveyed on foot, and all habitats and plant species observed on the project site were noted and mapped. General site conditions were also photographed. The field survey took place during sunny conditions with weather conditions conducive to the detection of all visible plant and animal species. An updated review of the project design was completed in February 2021. On October 21, 2024, LSA reviewed California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) records surrounding the project site and assessed impacts on previously mapped resources within the current site plan disturbance limits.
VEGETATION AND LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTIONS
Descriptions of the vegetation and land cover types occurring on the project site are listed below, using the Orange County Habitat Classification System (HCS) as articulated by Gray and Bramlet (1992).1 A vegetation map of the project site is contained in Attachment A. A complete list of plant species identified on the project site is contained in Attachment B. It should be noted that additional annual grass, forb, and wildflower species may be present on the project site but are not observable outside the typical springtime growing season.
1 Gray, J., and D. Bramlet. 1992. Habitat Classification System, Natural Resources Geographic Information System (GIS) Project. Santa Ana, California: County of Orange Environmental Management Agency.
Attachment 5
98 98 of 262
10/21/24 «\\vcorp12\projects\DCO2101\Biology\600 Buena Vista Way_Updated Bio Review.docx» 2 California Sagebrush-California Buckwheat Scrub (2.3.1 of the HCS): Areas classified as California sagebrush-California buckwheat scrub have between 25 and 90 percent cover by native perennial shrubs. This vegetation community occurs mostly within the northwestern portion of the project site and is present within all three fuel modification zones. The dominant shrub species in this mixed scrub community is California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), with subdominant shrubs including California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum) and black sage (Salvia mellifera). Less prevalent shrubs include chaparral mallow (Malacothamnus fasciculatus), California encelia (Encelia californica), blue elderberry (Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea), and lemonade berry (Rhus integrifolia).
Primary understory and interstitial species include giant wild-rye (Elymus condensatus) and California everlasting (Pseudognaphalium californicum) and, in areas with lower perennial shrub coverage, red brome (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens).
Toyon-Sumac Chaparral (3.12 of the HCS): A small stand of toyon-sumac chaparral is located near the westernmost boundary of Fuel Modification Zone C, along the lower reaches of the slope.
Lemonade berry is the dominant shrub within this vegetation community, with giant wild-rye and sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) occurring between the stands of evergreen shrubs. A sparse understory of coastal sage scrub species is present, as well as garden nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus) and other nonnative ornamental species closer to the existing residential developments.
Ornamental Plantings (15.5 of the HCS): Ornamental landscaping consists of introduced trees (palm, pine, eucalyptus, etc.), shrubs, flowers, and turf grass. Ornamental landscaping occurs within and adjacent to the project site along the edges of existing residential developments, particularly to the west, south, and east of the project site.
Developed or Disturbed (15.6 of the HCS):Developed or disturbed areas are paved or lack vegetation due to anthropogenic disturbances. Most of the construction footprint where the proposed residential development will be placed is covered by gravel or compacted soil, and several other barren areas adjacent to the roads and existing residential developments were mapped using this classification. Several nonnative trees and sparse weed patches are present in these areas.
Rock Outcrop (10.3 of the HCS): The northeastern portion of the project site immediately adjacent to the proposed building footprint contains a large exposed rock formation. While this area is generally unvegetated, several nonnative species including red brome and Hottentot-fig (Carpobrotus edulis), as well as California sagebrush, coastal deerweed (Acmispon glaber), and California buckwheat, are sparsely represented on the rock outcrop.
Ruderal (4.6 of the HCS): Ruderal areas generally contain a high percentage of bare ground and occur at any site that has been disturbed by natural or human causes. Areas classified as ruderal within the project site consist of disturbed areas that appear to be maintained for fuel modification purposes. At the time of survey, these areas were dominated by weedy and pioneering plant species including Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus), spotted spurge (Euphorbia maculata), shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), garden nasturtium, redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium), nonnative brome grasses, and Bermuda buttercup (Oxalis pes-caprae), among others. Isolated native shrubs (lemonade berry) as well as several nonnative palm trees also occur in these areas. 99 99 of 262
3 OTHER BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
No special-status plant or animal species were observed during the site survey, and no specialstatus biological resources have been recorded on or adjacent to the property based on the current CNDDB records. No wetlands, drainage features, or riparian habitat areas were recorded on the property during the site survey, and the project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor.
If you have any questions regarding the contents of this memorandum, please contact Bo Gould at (949) 553-0666 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
LSA Associates, Inc.
Bo Gould
Associate/Senior Biologist
Attachments: A: Vegetation Map
B: Vascular Plant Species Observed
10/21/24 «\\vcorp12\projects\DCO2101\Biology\600 Buena Vista Way_Updated Bio Review.docx» 100
100 of 262
600 B UENA VISTA WAY
L AGUNA BEACH , ORANGE C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
ATTACHMENT A
VEGETATION MAP
101
101 of 262
Service Layer Credits: © 2021 Microsoft
Corporation © 2021 Maxar ©CNES (2021)
Distribution Airbus DS
Fuel Modification Zone *
Zone A
Zone B
Zone C
Vegetation / Land Cover Classification
10.3 Rock Outcrop
15.5 Ornamental Plantings
15.6 Developed / Disturbed
2.3.1 California Sagebrush - California Buckwheat Scrub
3.12 Toyon - Sumac Chaparral
4.6 Ruderal SOURCE: Bing (2015); (Leyva & Wilde, Inc. 2021) I:\DCO2101\GIS\MXD\Vegetation.mxd (2/1/2021)
FIGURE 1
Cozzens Residence Project
Vegetation Mapping
0 25 50
FEET
*Approximations based
on geographic references
and measurements.
Proposed
Grading
102
102 of 262
600 B UENA VISTA WAY
L AGUNA BEACH , ORANGE C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
ATTACHMENT B
VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED
103
103 of 262
PL A N T INVEN TORY
F EBRUARY 2021
600 B UENA VISTA WAY
L AGUNA BEACH , ORANGE C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
D-1
VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED
The following vascular plant species were observed on the project site (including the proposed construction footprint and associated fuel modification areas) on February 21, 2018. The Vegetation Community column provides the Habitat Classification Code in which the species were primarily detected on the project site. * = introduced species not native to Southern California POLYPODIOPSIDA Vegetation
Community
Pteridaceae Maidenhair fern family
Pentagramma triangularis ssp. triangularis goldenback fern 2.3.1
GYMNOSPERMS
Pinaceae Pine family
Pinus canariensis* Canary island pine 4.6, 15.6
EUDICOTS
Adoxaceae Muskroot family
Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea blue elderberry 2.3.1, 3.12, 15.5 Aizoaceae Carpet weed family
Carpobrotus edulis* Hottentot-fig 2.3.1, 10.3
Amaranthaceae Amaranth family
Amaranthus blitoides prostrate pigweed 4.6, 15.6
Anacardiaceae Sumac family
Malosma laurina laurel sumac 3.12, 4.6, 2.3.1
Rhus integrifolia lemonade berry 2.3.1, 3.12
Apiaceae Carrot family
Foeniculum vulgare* sweet fennel 2.3.1, 3.12, 4.6
Asteraceae Sunflower family
Ambrosia psilostachya western ragweed 2.3.1
Artemisia californica California sagebrush 2.3.1, 3.12, 10.3 Baccharis pilularis ssp. consaguinea coyote brush 2.3.1 Centaurea melitensis* tocalote 2.3.1, 4.6
Encelia californica California encelia 2.3.1, 10.3
Ericameria pinifolia pine-bush 2.3.1
Erigeron canadensis common horseweed 2.3.1
Heterotheca grandiflora telegraph weed 2.3.1, 15.6
Isocoma menziesii var. vernonioides coastal goldenbush 2.3.1 Malacothrix saxatilis var. tenuifolia cliff malacothrix 2.3.1 104
104 of 262
PL A N T INVEN TORY
F EBRUARY 2021
600 B UENA VISTA WAY
L AGUNA BEACH , ORANGE C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
B-2
Pseudognaphalium biolettii bicolored cudweed 2.3.1
Pseudognaphalium californicum California everlasting 2.3.1 Stephanomeria diegensis San Diego wreath-plant 2.3.1, 4.6 Boraginaceae Borage family
Phacelia ramosissima branching phacelia 2.3.1
Brassicaceae Mustard family
Brassica nigra* black mustard 2.3.1, 4.6
Hirschfeldia incana* shortpod mustard 2.3.1, 4.6
Chenopodiaceae Goosefoot family
Atriplex semibaccata* Australian saltbush 4.6
Chenopodium album* lamb’s quarters 4.6, 15.6
Salsola tragus* Russian-thistle 4.6, 15.6
Crassulaceae Stonecrop family
Crassula ovata* jade plant 15.5
Dudleya pulverulenta ssp. pulverulenta chalk dudleya 2.3.1 Cucurbitaceae Gourd family
Marah macrocarpus wild cucumber 2.3.1, 3.12, 4.6
Euphorbiaceae Spurge family
Chamaesyce maculata* spotted spurge 4.6, 15.6
Ricinus communis* castor bean 4.6, 15.6
Fabaceae Pea family
Acmispon glaber coastal deerweed 2.3.1, 10.3
Acacia pycnantha* golden wattle 15.5 (adjacent to
northwest Zone C)
Geraniaceae Geranium family
Erodium cicutarium* redstem filaree 4.6, 15.6
Grossulariaceae Gooseberry family
Ribes speciosum fuchsia-flowered gooseberry 2.3.1
Lamiaceae Mint family
Salvia mellifera black sage 2.3.1
Malvaceae Mallow family
Malacothamnus fasciculatus chaparral mallow 2.3.1
Myrtaceae Myrtle family
Eucalyptus spp.* gum tree 15.5
Nyctaginaceae Four-o’clock family
Mirabilis laevis var. crassifolia wishbone bush 2.3.1, 10.3 105
105 of 262
PL A N T INVENTORY
F EBRUARY 2021
600 B UENA VISTA WAY
L AGUNA BEACH , ORANGE C OUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
B-3
Oxalidaceae Wood sorrel family
Oxalis pes-caprae* Bermuda buttercup 4.6, 15.6
Phrymaceae Monkey-flower family
Mimulus aurantiacus bush monkey flower 2.3.1
Plantaginaceae Plantain family
Antirrhinum nuttallianum Nuttall’s snapdragon 2.3.1, 10.3 Polygonaceae Buckwheat family
Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat 2.3.1
Rosaceae Rose family
Heteromeles arbutifolia toyon 2.3.1, 3.12
Scrophulariaceae Figwort family
Scrophularia californica California figwort 2.3.1
Solanaceae Nightshade family
Datura wrightii jimsonweed 4.6, 15.6
Nicotiana glauca* tree tobacco 4.6, 15.6
Tropaeolaceae Nasturtium family
Tropaeolum majus* garden nasturtium 4.6, 15.5
MONOCOTS
Agavaceae Agave family
Agave americana* American century plant 15.5
Arecaceae Palm family
Phoenix canariensis* Canary Island palm 4.6, 15.5, 15.6 Syagrus romanzoffiana* Queen palm 4.6, 15.5, 15.6
Washingtonia robusta* Mexican fan palm 4.6, 15.5, 15.6
Poaceae Grass family
Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens* red brome 4.6, 15.6
Cynodon dactylon* Bermuda grass 4.6
Elymus condensatus giant wild-rye 2.3.1, 3.12
Festuca myuros var. myuros* rattail fescue 4.6, 15.6
Poa annua* annual blue grass 4.6, 15.6
Stipa pulchra purple needle grass 2.3.1
Strelitziaceae Bird of paradise family
Strelitzia reginae* bird of paradise 15.5
106
106 of 262
Scher Letter.docx
Newmeyer & Dillion LLP
895 Dove Street
Second Floor
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 854-7000
Las Vegas | Newport Beach | Walnut Creek
newmeyerdillion.com
Charles S. Krolikowski
[email protected]
February 17, 2026
VIA E-MAIL
Laguna Beach Planning Commission
c/o City Clerk
505 Forest Avenue
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
[email protected]
Re: 600 Buena Vista Way – APN 641-373-43 (Heystee and Cozzens) - GPA 25- 2345/LCPA 25-2369
Dear Members of the Laguna Beach Planning Commission:
Please be advised that this office represents Mr. Marc Scher (“Scher”), the owner and resident of property located at 644 Buena Vista Way, Laguna Beach, California 92651 (“Scher Property”). We understand that Susan Heystee (“Heystee”) and Davis Cozzens (“Cozzens”) are seeking certain approvals to continue with the redevelopment of their property located at 600 Buena Vista Way, Laguna Beach, California 92651 (“Heystee Property”). The Scher and Heystee Properties are located adjacent to each other.
Based on notice received, it appears that Heystee/Cozzens are seeking legislative approvals for General Plan Amendment (“GPA”) 25-2345 and Local Coastal Program Amendment (“LCPA”) 25-2369 to remove a “mapped significant natural watercourse” on/near the Heystee Property. As you are likely aware, watercourses (natural or manmade) come with a unique set of issues and questions, including but not limited to the following:
How does the existing watercourse receive and direct waterflows based on historic drainage patterns and the watershed?
Do any resource agencies, such as the California Department of Fish & Wildlife, the Army Corps of Engineers, the California Coastal Commission, the Orange County Flood Control District, etc., have any oversight with respect to the requested removal of the watercourse?
Attachment 6
107
107 of 262
City Clerk
February 17, 2026